7% wjf (2) Before Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh At Bilaspur WritPetitiomsmo. -?fo_?j 12009 SENGLE BENSH PETITIONERS : 1. Mrs. YasminfAyub Age about 45 years, U.D.T. W/o Mr, Ayub lrfan Govt Hr. Sec. SchooL Anjora, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) 2. Sayed Anik Hussain Rizvi Age about 42 years, U.D.T. S/o Shri S. T. H. Rizvi Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Pateva, Distt. — Mahasamund (C.G.) 3. Shehzada Azaz Age about 42 years, U.D.T. S/o Shri G. Farukh Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Daundekala, Distt. — Raipur (C.G.) 4. Ku. Sunita Kaushal (Now Smt.Parashar) . Age about 46 years, U.D.T. W/o Shri Vinod Kumar Parashar Govt. High School, Ramnagar, Muktidham Distt. - é‘éggayo.) 5. Mrs. Tabassum Tanveer Age about 44. years, U.D.T. W/o Shri Tanveer Aqvil, Govt. A.G.H.S.School, Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) SOMKANT VERMA 3 () 6. Mani Ram Shrey Age about 43 years, U.D.T. S/o Shri Ramji Shrey Govt. Hr. Sec. SchooL Pateva, Distt. - Mahasamund (C.G.) S 7. mt. Sarojlata Agrawal Age aboutsv years, Asstt. Teacher W/o Shri A .k. Agrawal Govt. Middle School, Ramsagaara, rp Block — Bhatapara, D istt. - Ripur a (C.. G) ESPONDENTS : 1. State Govt.ofChhattisgarh R Through : The Secretary, Education Department, / D.K.s. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D,K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / VERSUS MM HEGH OURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR C 2 WRIT PETFHON §S) NO.7529 OF 2009 Mrs. Yasmin Ayah & Others PETETIONERS Versus RESPONDENTS State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & Anothe! {Writ Peiition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon’bke SM Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- $hri Somkant Verma, counse§ for the petifioners. Shi'i N.N. Roy, Pane! Lawyer for the 8tate. CREE ORAL (Passed an this 4‘ day of January, 2010) With the consent of teamed counsel for the parties’, the petition is heard finaliy. At the very outset! learned counsei appearing for the petitioners submits that this petition is squareiy covered by the decisioh of this Court passed in WP. (S) No.6257 of 2008 (Saiii Kant Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh 8i Others) and prays that similar relief may be granted in case of the present petitioners also. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event the petitioners submit a detailed representation the same shaft be considered and decided, in accordance'with iaw and in view of the decision of this Court rendered in Saiil Kant Singh {supra}, subject to verification of facts. . 4. in view of foregoing, according to the iearned counsel appearing for 5‘ the petitioner nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. \.i,~k"‘ L 1 ;i): Sd/_ . Gowri ‘ l : Satish K- Agmhmrr‘