IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25549 of 2010 1. RAJ KUMAR PASWAN S/O KUNWAR PASWAN 2. MUNNA PASWAN S/O SHAMBHU PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 366 A of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the statement of the alleged victim girl recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. that she had married Bhupendra Paswan out of her own sweet will and it was not a case of kidnapping, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge Fast Track Court Vth Saharsa, in connection with S.T. No. 70/10/S.T.No.103/10, arising out of Sonbarsa (Kash Nagar O.P.) P.S. case no. 94/2009, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be 2 a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. (Anjana Prakash, J)