IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WP/6680/2010 BABU ABDUL SHAIKH AND ANR V/S JALINDAR DINKAR GAIKWAD AND ORS ... Shri S.S.Kazi, Advocate for petitioners and Shri A.R.Vaidya, Advocate for respondents 1 to 5. ... CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI,J. Dated : April 15, 2011 PER COURT :- 1. Heard learned counsel for respective parties. 2. Petitioners/plaintiffs have filed a suit simpliciter for injunction. Shri Kazi, learned Advocate for petitioners contends that sale deeds have been executed on various occasions and hence respondents/ defendants are in possession of most of the properties and therefore, it is necessary to measure the entire property i.e. sold and unsold through the Court Commissioner and impugned order directing measurement of the property of the petitioners/plaintiffs only is misconceived. 3. Shri Vaidya, learned Advocate for respondents 1 to 5 supports the impugned order. According to him, looking to the nature of the suit as filed, the trial Court has correctly exercised its powers. 4. The suit is only for injunction and as such the trial Court has correctly limited the execution of commission to the suit property. I do not find any illegality or perversity in the impugned order. 5. Writ Petition is rejected. No order as to costs. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) ... akl