m ^ c %fc fc /°^ HIGHCOURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISIONBENCH Coram : HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUM/WStNIW, J. M.A.C. (PR) No. 146 of 2008. APPELLANTS T RESPONDENTS 4. Smt. Nira Devi, W/o Sukhi Ram Verraa, Aged about 52 years, Occupation: HouseWife, R/o Near AchholiBazar, Police Station Urla, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.). Mohan Lal Verma, S/o Late Sukhi Ram Verma, Aged about38 years, R/o Near Achholi Bazar, Police Station Uria, Tahstl and District Raipur (C.G.). Puran Lal Verma, S/o Late Sukhi Ram Verma, Aged about 36 years, R/o Kasidhi Line, No.448, Jamshedpur, District Singhbhum Jharkhand Smt. Uma Devi, W/o Naresh Kumar Verma, Aged about 32 years, R/o Kasidhi Line, No.448, Jamshedpur, District Singhbhum Jharkhand Versus 1. Ramesh Pandher, S/o Sukhbir Pandher, Occupation: Truck Driver, Wo G.E. Road, Tantibandh, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chandrashekhar Pardhikar, S/o Jingoji Pardhikar, Occupatlon: ^Truck Owner, R/o G.E. Road, Tantibandh, Raipur, Tahsil S District Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Throi^h: Divisional Manager, No.1; Kachahari Chowk, Jaii Road, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) RSBB AMITA AWASTHI Digitally signed by AMITA AWASTHI Date: 2025.02.04 11:18:44 +0530 m^ c %C£/^ Memo ofAppeal Under Section 173 ofthe M.V. Act.1988 Present: None for the appellants. QRDER (30th June, 2008) The foltowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, CJ.: Appellants' counsel absent. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. The appeal, therefore, is disroissed for want of pr(»ecutton. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge -^?-