IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1114 of 2007 ANJANI KUMAR CHAUDHARY & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 18.03.2009. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners have come to this court for a direction restraining the private respondents to go over the land in question bearing plot no. 1044, khata no. 317 measuring area 2 bigha 8 katha 17 dhoor. He further prays to stay the title suit no. 27 of 1999. The second relief prayed by the petitioner is misconceived, as such, the same is rejected outright. So far first relief is concerned it is submitted at the Bar that the Additional Collector has observed that in case if any one has encroached public land, necessary instruction would be issued for removing the encroachment in question. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that earlier CWJC No. 682 of 1996(Chandra Kant Jha versus the State of Bihar) had been filed praying therein to direct respondents to allow the public at large to use the land in question which had been dismissed observing that as the land had been settled way back in 1945 with private respondents, it cannot be annulled by the respondent authorities. In this view of the matter, this Court does not find any merit in the writ petition, which is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue any other remedy available in law. Shashi. (S.P.Singh,J).