3‘1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 2123 ofZOlO WRIT PE i i i ION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUIION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shfi Ravish Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Phnel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1 and 2. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 27 day of August, 201 1) At the very outset, Shri Vem‘w? learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has. joined the transferred place of posting pursuant to the order dated 30.06.2009 (Annexure P/l) which is under challenge in this petition. Thus nothing survives in this petition for adjudication and this petition has become inh‘uctuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side does not controvert the above submission. In View of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/— 1 SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI Judge PETITIONER : Niranjan Baiepari. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others.