{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 04 OF 2008 M/s Kothari Builders, Parbhani APPLICANT VERSUS Maharashtra State Board of Wakf, A’Bad &others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.P.V.Mandlik, Sr.Counsel i/b U.B.Bilolikar, for applicant Mrs.A.N.Ansari, advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 None for respondent No.3, though served ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE : 23rd June 2009 PER COURT: 1. By this application, the applicant, original plaintiff, has challenged the order dated 17.12.2007 passed below Exhibit-45 in Suit No.32/2004 by Maharashtra Wakf Tribunal, Aurangabad. 2. Initially, the suit was filed by the applicant against Maharashtra State Wakf Board, through Chief Executive Officer, District Wakf Officer, Parbhani and present respondent No.3, for declaration that the order passed by respondent No.1, dated 15.04.2004 in Enquiry Proceedings No.3244/2003, in respect of {2} property mentioned in the said suit, be declared as null and void and not binding on them and for issuance of perpetual injunction. Subsequent to the filing of the said suit, by amendment application (Exhibit-45), an amendment was sought in respect of change of nomenclature of respondents No.1 and 2 in the title clause as well as corresponding changes in the suit. Considering the nature of amendment it appears to be formal and the same will not going to change the nature of the suit nor will it affect the rights of the defendants. In the premise, the order passed by the Wakf Tribunal is not proper and hence the same requires to be quashed and set aside. Accordingly, order dated 07.12.2007, passed below Exhibit-45 is hereby quashed and set. The amendment application (Exhibit-45) filed by the applicant before the Wakf Tribunal is hereby allowed. Amendment to be carried out within a period of 2 weeks from today. Civil Revision Application stands disposed of as indicated above with no order as to costs. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/cra4-08