IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34972 of 2010 SURESH YADAV, SON OF KABIR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 364 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner kept absconding for about five years while the others were put on trial and acquitted, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner will renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case shall not be bifurcated for the purposes of commitment or for charge and if it is done, his bail shall not be considered. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)