1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO: 6002/2007 (Namdeo Mahadeorao Choudhari & others vs. State of Maharashtra and another ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. ................................................................................................................................... CORAM: D.D.SINHA & A.P.BHANGALE,JJ. DATED: 9 th June, 2009. *** 1. Heard Mr A C Dharmadhikari, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr Nitin Sambre, learned counsel for Respondent No.2 and Mr S M Puranik, for intervenor. 2. Grievance of the petitioners is in respect of construction of Nagpur-Godhani Road undertaken by the Nagpur Improvement Trust (NIT). 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the construction activity undertaken by the respondents is inconsistent with the road shown in this regard in the Development Plan of the City of Nagpur and, therefore, the said activity is unsustainable in law. 4. Mr. Nitin Sambre, learned counsel for 2 NIT, has submitted that the construction of road/roads shall be done as per the Development Plan of city of Nagpur, which is also stated in the affidavit dated 24.3.2009 filed by Mr. Pramod Dhankar Engineer of NIT. 5. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, no further action is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Even otherwise, the authorities are required to act in accordance with the Development Plan of Nagpur City. Writ Petition is disposed of. 6. Civil Application No. 5735/2008 for intervention is also disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE sahare