1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 203 OF 2008 Nitin Govindrao Patil ...Petitioner Versus Secretary, Venkatesh Shikshan Sanstha, Jadhala, Tq. Chakur, District Latur and others ...Respondents ..... Mr. Vivek Bhavthankar, advocate for the petitioner Mr. P.R. Patil, advocate for respondent No. 1 and 2 ..... CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2009 PER COURT:- 1 Heard counsel appearing for the respective parties. Perused the contents of the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2. 2 Learned counsel appearing for the respective parties jointly submit that in view of compromise arrived at between the parties, the impugned judgment and order dated dated 30.11.2007 passed by the School Tribunal, Latur in appeal No. 210 of 2006 is required to be set 2 aside. 3 After hearing counsel for the parties and after perusal of the affidavit in replies filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, this writ petition can be disposed of by setting aside the order dated 30.11.2007 passed by the School Tribunal, Latur in appeal No. 210 of 2006. 4 Learned AGP on the basis of the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of respondent No.3 submitted that the petitioner is approved clerk. Taking over all view of the matter, the impugned order dated 30.11.2007 passed by the School Tribunal, Latur in appeal No. 210 of 2006 is set aside and petition is disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties to the writ petition. 5 Writ petition is disposed of. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) rlj/