IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH : HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH (26TH) DAY OF NOVEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN Present: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SRI G.V.SEETHAPATHY Criminal Petition No.10026 of 2010 Between: Daggula Krishna Reddy & 2 others … Petitioners And: The State through the Police Talakondapally, rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of A.P., Hyderabad & another … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Criminal Petition No.10026 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioners-1 to A.3 and 2nd respondent-complainant are present. Sri K. Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri D. Ravukumar Reddy, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent, are also present. 2. Both parties have stated that they have settled their dispute out side the Court amicably and entered into compromise. Both parties have filed joint memo of compromise. The 2nd respondent-complainant stated that in pursuance of the compromise, he is withdrawing the complaint filed by him against the petitioners and he is no longer interested in prosecuting the petitioners in Cr.No.103 of 2010 of Talakondapally, Mahabubnagar. 3. In view of the compromise entered into between the parties settling the dispute amicably out side the Court, it is considered that no useful purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings against the petitioners in Cr.No.103 of 2010 and it is a fit case to invoke inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash further proceedings against the petitioners in Cr.No.103 of 2010 of Talakondapally, Mahabubnagar district. 4. In the circumstances, further proceedings against the petitioners in Cr.No.103 of 2010 of Talakondapally, Mahabubnagar district are held liable to be quashed and are accordingly quashed. 5. In the result, the criminal petition is disposed of as stated above. ___________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J Date: 26.11.2010 bss