^^^: ^0...-;';;!^ ^^'..^••"o^-'-' ...---:^*^"""L...--"" ^•^^9®4--'""" p<es^u-\>^-"" o-^ ?.9-' ?<E &aW°- C^" 1 ffT3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S)NO. ^f3-y& 72006 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1. ^o^ ^)ft^s^ '-«s. ^ R.K. Sharma, S/o. Late Shri Harish/ Chandra Shan-aa, aged about 53 years, R/o. Office of Superintendent Engineer, Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna Mandal, Pariyojna Mandal, Kanker District Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh,, Through Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Engineer in Chief, < Water Resources Department, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer, ' Water Resources Department, Division, Raigarh, District Raigarh Sub Secretary, Panchayat and Granun Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Joint Secretary,- Panchayat and Gramin Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF _A_ WRHLJN_ THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER ^ XI-HC-78 3^s(pn^pT, y^^'is, Riciiyy HIM^I sh^ich \^^<^Q"H3-^ ^ 200^ w^?r cra^ (yit^q^.T) an^TWRRRi (PffSfl'RTshHlti s^rwgfig'sn^T 18-8.2006 Mr. Sunil Otwani, counsel fdf Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy G< advance copy. Heard. The petitioner's case is th^t Water Resources Department and] 1) he was sent on deputation t{> Development. In compliance of| Department of Panchayat & Rurat] of the Water Resources Departmefit 6-2006 and the same has been petitioner made a representation Deveiopment stating therein tha< Department of Panchayat & Rural being decided. ^^ Having heard learned counf petition, the petitioner has already] Rura! Deveiopment in pursuam thereafter, that order has been petitions. That order was quashett Advocate General on behalf of thk scheme for sending the Engineer the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Y< Therefore, in the the Department of Panchayat & passing the order regarding PMG^Y circumstertces tii<i(<i41'i wraf if tec^ <lait-!:.i< ^iaTf^Hsn^r the petitioner. ivt. Advocate for the State/respondents, on ^t he was wori<ing as Sub Engineer in Uie vide order dated 12-6-2006 (Annexure P- tt> the Department of Panchayat & Rurai that ordsr, the petitioner joined in the Development. Later on, other Engineers had chaltenged the said order dated 12- quashed by this Court. Thereafter, the |to the Department.of Panchayat & Rural he does not want to continue in the pevelopment, but his representation is not i^el for the parties and having perused the [ joined in the Department of Panchayat & te of the order dated 12-6-2006 and q^iashed qua the petitioners who fiied the on the submission made by the Deputy State that the State has framed a new of Water Resourees Department under ^jana (PMGSY) scheme. >, as the petitioner has already joined in i^ural Development, the respondents while 3$Y scheme in respect of the Engineers of P.T.O. Er~ a^T-' XI-HC-78 3n^T^TR.<i+ (isiT3?i^raiTTR; 3^'HnqT^pc^ BTfly'IS, (SlMlwy *11*1MI ShMiqi Wi; 200 3(T^?T'<acn (>icl^q<<6T) ?T(tTW (rf?cT sn^T 3-' alo|ng Water Resources Department as the petitioner beiongs to should pass appropriate order the services of the petitioner. Tii| Department of Panchayat & Ruraj alreadyjoined. With the direction aforesaid,] Parties are entstted for certifit sho^ld also consider the case of the petitioner, Wat^r Resourees Department, therefore, they with the other Enginesre in respect of then, the petitioner shal! continue in the Devsiopment on the post whers hs has qiratoft-T WRrf if te^t rfsresK ^sri^riTsn^T the petition stands disposed of. idcopyofthisorder. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge