IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 7TH JANUARY 2011 / 17TH POUSHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 8681 of 2010() ---------------------------------------- ( CRIME NO.941/2010 OF WADAKKANCHERY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR) .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED ----------------------------------- SMT. SARANYA, W/O. NIJO, AGED 20 YEARS, KUDILIL HOUSE THEKKUMKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP BY CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, WADAKKANCHERY POLICE STATION CRIME NO.941/2010) THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * B.A.No. 8681 of 2010 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 7-01-2011 ORDER In this petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the accused in Crime No. 941 of 2010 of Wadakkancherry Police Station for an offence punishable under Secs. 302 and 309 I.P.C. seeks anticipatory bail. 2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. 3. After evaluating the factors and parameters which are to be taken into consideration in the light of paragraph 122 of the verdict dated 2-12-2010 of the Apex Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and Others (2010 (4) KLT 930),, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer- in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioner on bail for a period of one month in the event of her arrest in connection with the above case on her executing a bond for ` 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the said officer and subject to the following conditions:- 1) The petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation as and when required by the investigating B.A. No. 8681 of 2010 -:2:- officer. 2) The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall she attempt to tamper with the evidence of the prosecution. 3) Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. 5. The bail granted pursuant to this order shall be in force till the end of the trial of the case unless and until it is cancelled by this Court in accordance with paragraph 103 of the verdict in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre's case (supra). If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to her shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above. Dated this the 7th day of January, 2011. Sd/-V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) /true copy/ P.S. to Judge ani/ B.A. No. 8681 of 2010 -:3:- ani.