... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.10 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.10 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.10 OF 2006 Dilip Pandurang Dabole ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Shri Niranjan Mundargi for the Petitioner. Shri P.S. Hingorani, A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM : R.S.MOHITE, J. CORAM : R.S.MOHITE, J. CORAM : R.S.MOHITE, J. DATE : JANUARY 16, 2006. DATE : JANUARY 16, 2006. DATE : JANUARY 16, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard both the sides. This is an Application for reducing the bail amount granted by the order dated 07.12.2005. It is pointed out to me that the co-accused who is convicted under the same section and in the same crime have been granted bail on the same terms as obtained during the pendency of the trial on executing fresh bonds. The Advocate for the Applicant says that if bail amount is reduced to Rs.20,000/- with all earlier conditions remaining intact, it will suffice the purpose. In the circumstances, bail order dated 07.12.2005 is modified and the bail amount is reduced to the sum of Rs.20,000/- with all other conditions remaining intact. 2. The Application is disposed of accordingly. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE