IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 14TH JANUARY 2010 / 24TH POUSHA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 173 of 2010() ----------------------------- CC.497/2009 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, THAMARASSERY .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): 5TH ACCUSED: --------------------------------- K.MOOSAKUTTY, AGED 70 YEARS, S/O.KUNHAYINKUTTY, PERIYATTUCHALIL HOUSE, RAROTH AMSOM DESOM, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT/STATE: --------------------------------- 1. P.K.C.AHAMMEDKUTTY, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.AYAMMED KUTTY, PARAKKANDI HOUSE, POONNOOR, UNNIKULAM, KOYILANDY TALUK, KOZHIKODE. 2. STATE REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRIL C.S. HRITHWIK THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P. NO. 173 of 2010 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 14-01-2010 ORDER The petitioner who is the 5th accused in C.C. No. 497 of 2009 on the file of the J.F.C.M. I, Thamarassery, challenges Annexure - III order passed by the Magistrate taking cognizance of offences punishable under Sections 465, 467 and 468 against A1 to A5. 2. This Court sitting in revision will be loathe to interfere with the said order issuing summons to A1 to A5 after taking cognizance of the offence. The petitioner can raise all the contentions available to him in law at the appropriate stage before the framing of charge. The petitioner will be entitled to plead for a discharge in absentia. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. Dated this the 14th day of January, 2010. Sd/-V.RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) /true copy/ P.A. to Judge ani.