HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR Writ Petition (0 No. 2160 of2007 i-'euuoners ^- 2. 3. 4. 5. Versus 8. Zahoor S/o Tijau Agsu-about 55 yrs. Caste - Gond Alakhram S/o Tijau Aged-about 57 yrs. Caste-Gond Bahoor S/o Tijau Aged-about 53 yrs. Caste-Gond Harprasad S/o Kashiram Aged-about 52 yrs. Harabai D/o Kashiram Aged-about 50 yrs. All are R/o viliage-Rank P.H.No. 37 Tahsii-?.test'jri, Distt.-Bllaspur (C.G.) Jaanaki Bai W/o Chhedi caste- Gond R/o village - Airamsahi, Tahsil - Masturi, Distt.-Biiaspur (C.G.) Punnibai W/o Mangal singh R/o vi!iage- Parsadaa Siili, Haal Mukam-village- Rank, Tahsil- Masturi, Disti.-Bilaspur (C.G.) State ofChhattisgarh, Through- Collector, Bitaspur (C.G.) Sub Divisiona! Officer/Land Acquisition Officer (C.G.) Treasury Officer, Treasury office, Coliectorate Branch, Bilaspur (C.G.) iranch Manager State Bank of India, branch-Paii, Tahsil- Katghora, Distt.-Korba (C.G.) Genera! Manager N.T.P.C., Seepat, Bilaspur (C.G.) Jeewan la! S/o Rambharose R/o Rank, Post-Koudiya, Distt.-Bilaspur (C.G.) SB: Hon'ble Justice Shri Satish K, AgnihQtn Present: Mr. Sanjay Patei, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel lawyer for the respondents No. 3 and 4/State. (Passed on this 10th day ofAprii, 2007) 1. By this petition, filed under Articie 227 of the Constitution of india, the petitioner impugns the interim order dated 3.3.2007 (P/4) passed by the !11 Civil Judge, Class-1, Bi!aspur in an application filed under Order Vli ! 'i Rule 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in pending Civi! Suit No. 96 A/06. The petitioner has filed a copy of 'Kisht Bandi Khatouni' after the stage of examining the witnesses produced by both the parties was over and the matter was listed for final argument. The petitioner has flted this appiication for taking the certified copy of the said document on record. At this stage, this cannot be entertained, as there is no opportunity to prove the documents, as examination is over. Even otherwise, there is no procedura! irregularity in the order and it does not SLfier from any infirmity, irreguiarity, illegaiity or procedural error to cati for indulgence under Article 227 ofthe Constitution of India. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed summarily. B/- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ¥-