V" s IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURJCG^ WRIT PETITIO NJMO. Y20Q5 PETITIONER ,0<-', Q,A~> "".^-"^.V^ -0' ..•f'TSt^.^' ^^a':^''"•""""....•••"•"' e*u^ ...<c <- :^-' ..•••° Baldau Prasad Sharma, son of Chironji Lal Sharma, aged about 24 years (presently 46) Government Primary School - Sanghkapat, North Pandariya, Distt. Bilaspur (Presently Distt. Kawardha), resident of village Dalpi, Post Dullapur (Bazar), Tah. Pandariya, Distt. Kawardha (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh, through : the Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) The Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchalnalay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) y-^su??^ '-SA 'i^^^i /'^.^''l'K-y ,f. .V ^^l^R .Si Uu The District Education Officer, Education Distt. Kawardha, (Chhattisgarh) The State of Madhya Pradesh through : the Secretary, Department of Education, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) , The Secretary, Department of General Admihistration, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) 4 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA XI-HC-22 sn^rw R-<i4i3TI^T stilitiBfgcT s^ '*ii<)iit<<, ©Tfl^'is,Rfcii'yy 3ii^i ^iacb ^,^^.£.i.3.^.lo.r^ ff^ 311^1 ^•wiwtri%a' lonetr Stelte AsSisNut petitio^ie; 7.4.2005 ShriA.N, Bhakta, couns^l Shri Akhil Agrawal, Paiie|l Heard. The case of the petitionejr Departinent of erstwlule appoiatraent of ad-hoc Schools. In fhat test fhe appoiated for a period of fhree nionth. However, the services] vacaacv which arises on petitioner's semces was fiBe4 petitioner is regularly iuajki4s petitioner to the appoiatiaent petitioner is that ia fhe year of M.P. took a decision to Shiksha Karmi but same is Chliattisgarh. Leamed counsel for fhe aflowed to niake a grievaaces aad respondeut representation, to which objection. Haviag heard learaed to the facts and citcuiastance! inake a representation withirl representa]tion learded +i'ii(<-f'ln-t 4iwi'ffrsl<;i <R]«|< ^SlRFTStI^T for the petitioner. Lawver for the State. is that in the vear 1979 the Education of M.P. conducted a test for the Teachers in fhe Govemuient Primarv [dper was selected aad accoiduigly, he was |m.onths on a fixed salaiy ofRs.300/- per of the petitioner were disconttuued and afccount of the discontmuation of the by the State of M.P. Thereafter, fhe representations for considering the the post of teacher. Further case of fhe vide Amiexure P-3 fhe erstwtule State fhe ad-hoc teachers in place of ijiot beiag impleinented by the State of oln 19197 a'tipoiat jietitioner subinits fhat petitioner inay be to respondent No.2 raising aU his No.2 be directed to decide his counsel for fhe respondent has no c()iiusel for fhe parties and having regard of the case, the petitioner is attowed to a period of ten davs fi'oia today to -a^i&D^. XI-HC-22 'ss; "!<|<<KI<|, eiTn+i'iia, feTrey yrqsra? s\ <<ltCTTSht|l«h V^ 200 sn^r^iT tewsn^r stitflitiylsd W^l gWIWflf?(T hib respondent No.2 raisiug aU is directed to decide the fhree nionths froni the dati consideruig all the grievaace) wifh law, With the direction aforcit Consequentiy, M.(W:}P. disposed of. Certified copy as per ru^i repre|sentati' °bMf<-<41-i wraffffeiifl (KIW( ^ari^irsn^r grievaaces aad in tura respondent No. 2 ;ntation of fhe petitioner within anofher of receipt of fhe representation after raised by the petitioner ia accordance said, the petition staads disposed of. |No. 1046/05 Sc, I.A. No.2535/05 also staad 's. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo