IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1304 of 2011 BAIDYA NATH PRASAD YADAV, SON OF LATE RAM NARAYAN MANDAL, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA LAKSHMIPUR, WARD NO.7,MADHEPURA, POLICE STATION & DISTRICT MADHEPURA. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY-CUM-SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA. 5. THE REGISTRAR OF B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA. 6. THE FINANCE OFFICER, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA. 7. THE PRINCIPAL, PARVATI SCIENCE COLLEGE, MADHEPURA. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 21.1.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri H.P. Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura as well Shri Ajay Kumar, learned A.C. to S.C.1. The petitioner has prayed for directing the respondents for payment of admitted retiral dues. It was submitted that petitioner retired with effect from 31.7.2009 from the post of Lecturer, Parvati Science College, Madhepura. Learned counsel for the petitioner candidly admitted that earlier for the payment of salary, the petitioner had approached this Court, which was disposed of. It was also admitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that absorption of the petitioner in service is still disputed and under litigation. 2 N.H./ In view of admitted position, it would be difficult for this Court to pass any positive order in favour of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that absorption of the petitioner in service may be disputed, but fact remains that petitioner’s contribution in the Provident Fund and Insurance are still lying. Since the matter of absorption is still in dispute and in litigation, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present petition. The writ petition stands dismissed. However, it is made clear that the respondents may consider for payment of Provident Fund amount and Insurance amount. However, at subsequent stage, in case of final decision being taken in respect of absorption, rejection of the present petition may not be treated as hurdle for the petitioner. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)