H!CTi03URT QF ajHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.fSI No.7053 of 2007 PETITIONBR RESPOMDENTS Dropadi, Kosle, w/o Rajesh Kumar Kosle, a^ed. about 22 years, Caste Satnami, R/o ViUage Daruwankapa Th. MugeU District Bilaspur(CG) Versus 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Departaient of Women and Child Developnient, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2 The Coinuussioner, Woinen and Child Developnaent, Raipur(CG) 3. The CoUector, Bilaspur, Distnct Bilaspur(CG) 4. The Disrict Programiae Of&cer, Wom.eu and Child Development, Bilaspur(CG) S. The Project Of&cer, Women aad Child Developiaent Pafharia, District BilaspurfCG) 6. Sm.t. Basaati Bai, w/o Dew Charan, aged about 23 years, r/o village Daruwankapa Tah MugeU, District Bilaspur(CG) (Writ Petitloa under Article 226 of the Coastitution of India) Appearaace: Shri Rahul Mishia, counsel for fhe petidoner. Shri Sumeet Verxna, Panel Lawyer, for the State on advauce copy. ORAL ORDER (26.11.2007J SUNIL KUMAR 8INHA. J. Heard. The petitioner is aggrieved wifh order dated 23.7.2007, by which, respondent No.6 has beea appointed on the post of Aaugabadi Worker. She has chaUenged the selection of respondent No.6, prayed for settiiig aside the order aad for issuaace of an order in her favour. ^^Ssa., W.P.fS).No. 7053 of2007 Learued counsel for fhe petitioner argues that though the provision of statutoiy appeal is there, no appeal has been preferred by the petitioner aud fhe petitioner has directly visited to the High Court. In view of the above, I am not iacliaed to interfere with fhe order at this stage. The petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner shaU be at liberty to avail fhe appropriate statutory remedy available under the law. §j/. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judse 11- \