1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No. 5 of 2010 . in Family Court Appeal No.37 of 2009. Jagdish Dayal Giri .. Applicant v/s. Shraddha Jagdish Giri ..Respondent Smt. Vasanti Joshi for the Applicant. Mr.A.M.Vernekar for the Respondent & Appellant in Family Court Appeal CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED : January 15, 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. In this Civil Application, the applicant has prayed for restoration of the Civil Application No.184 of 2009 in Family Court Appeal No.37 of 2 2009 which was dismissed in default vide order dated 20.11.2009. In Civil Application No.184 of 2009 the applicant had prayed for restoration of the Family Court Appeal No.37 of 2009 which came to be dismissed for non prosecution vide order dated 23.6.2009. 3. Learned Counsel for the applicant states that in pursuance of the Order dated 26.2.2009 passed in the appeal, the appellant has already deposited the arrears of maintenance in this Court. According to Mr. Vernekar the amount of arrears as of today plus the costs imposed vide order dated 26.2.2009 is much more than the amount deposited by the appellant. He then invited our attention to the impugned judgment and submitted that the appellant has also not paid the amount of Rs.1,88,900/- being the value of stridhan articles. Mrs.Joshi, learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is prepared to deposit the entire arrears, including the cost imposed vide order dated 26.2.2009 plus amount of Rs. 1,88,900/- within a period of 6 weeks from today. Her statement is accepted. Subject to such deposit being made in this court by the applicant, the order dated 20.11.2009 passed on the Civil Application No. 184 of 2009 is set aside. Civil Application No.55 of 2009 for restoration to come up for hearing 3 after six weeks. S.O. to 26.2.2010. [D.B.BHOSALE, J.] [R.Y.GANOO, J.]