1 ABA 978 OF 2011 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.978 OF 2011 1. Parvez Akthar Rais Momin 2. Mrs. Salma Rais Momin .. Applicants -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. K. K. Malpathak, for the applicants. Mrs. M. R. Tidke, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 2nd December, 2011 P.C. 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by husband and mother in law of the first informant, who was married in the year 2008 and was driven out matrimonial home in 2009. She had filed maintenance application under Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure Code on 17th August, 2009. This was disposed of as withdrawn on 3rd March, 2010. She also filed complaint under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act on 26th November, 2009. This came to be dismissed for want of prosecution on 11th August, 2011. Before this on 17th July, 2011, she filed report on which offence was registered. In both the applications under Section 125 of Cr.P.C and the complaint under Domestic Violence Act, there is no reference of the gold 2 ABA 978 OF 2011 ornaments being retained by the applicant. Even so, the Investigating Officer may proceed with the investigation, but without the applicants being in custody. In view of this, in the event of applicants' arrest in C.R. NO.I-160 of 2011 registered with Bhiwandi City Police Station, District: Thane, they be released on bail on their furnishing P.R.Bonds in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- by each of them with one of or more solvent sureties in the sums aggregating to Rs.25,000/- by each of them on the following conditions :- i) The applicants shall make themselves available on 8th Decembers, 2011 at 11.00 a.m. for interrogation by the Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required by the Investigating Officer. ii) The applicants shall also furnish their mobile telephone numbers and addresses and other details to the investigating officer. iii) The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iv) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. v) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of 3 ABA 978 OF 2011 the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, reported in A.I. R. 2011 (SC) 312. vi) The application stands disposed of . (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)