IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.14633 of 2000 (O&M) Date of decision: December 18, 2008 Malkiat Singh Joshan ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate for the petitioner. Dr. Balram Gupta, Sr. Advocate wit Mr. Shireesh Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. Mr. J.S. Sandhu, AAG, Punjab. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) This order may be read in continuation of the order dated 10.12.2008. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-College has fairly stated that in fact the benefit of Selection Grade was granted to the aforesaid Mr. G.S. Chandi. The only caveat he is putting that respondents No.2 & 3 invariably follow the UGC guidelines and have granted Selection Grade only to those lecturers who have completed UGC norms viz attendance of two refresher courses. He further states that the college has released the Selection Grade to various lecturers from the date when they have achieved the eligibility as envisaged by CWP No.14633 of 2000 (O&M) -2- the UGC for the said Selection Grade. Learned counsel for the petitioner has asserts that in fact the petitioner had attended the two refresher courses and also supplied photocopies of the same to the learned senior counsel appearing for respondents No.2 &3. In these circumstances, this writ petition is allowed and the petitioner is entitled to get all the pensionary benefits including the Selection Grade to which he is entitled. The respondents are directed to release all the consequential benefits above mentioned if not already released within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. December 18, 2008 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE