IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-310 of 2010 Date of Decision:10.3.2010 Rachhpal Singh @ Kaka .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. N.P.S. Mann, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that as per the report of the Radiologist, there are no pallets in the body, as such, there is no fire arm injuries and the same are only burn injuries. Vide order dated 2.3.2010, learned State counsel was directed to verify and obtain medical opinion of the doctor concerned with respect to the injury i.e. whether there are fire arm injuries or not. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State, states that as per the opinion of the Doctor Smt. Gurinder Kaur, EMO, Civil Hospital, Ludhiana, the injuries are gun shot (fire injury). It is further stated that the weapon used in the incident is yet to be recovered. No ground for anticipatory bail is made out. Dismissed. 10.3.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE