IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 44 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 81 OF 2006 SMT. MADHURI RAMA PHADTE AND 3 ORS., ... Applicants Versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ... Respondent Mr. J. Abreu Lobo,Advocate for the applicants. Mr.E. Afonso, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- R. C. CHAVAN, J. Date:- 12th August, 2008 P.C. By this application, the legal representatives of original respondents seek order dismissing first appeal as abated. According to them, the original respondent died on 14.3.2006. The applicants had sent notice to this effect to the learned Advocate for the appellants on 25.8.2006 which was duly received by the learned Advocate. No steps were taken to bring L.Rs. of deceased respondent on record and, therefore, they seek orders that the appeal has abated. No orders to the effect that the appeal has abated is necessary because abatement is automatic on failure to bring the L.Rs. on record within prescribed time. Learned Counsel for the appellant states that he has already filed an applications for setting aside abatement, condonation of delay and bringing L.Rs. on record. 2. It appears that the original respondent was shown expired on 14.3.2006. Yet, the bailiff of Civil Court, Panaji seems to have effected service on 19.7.2006 on the daughter of the respondent Rama Phadate without even a whisper that Rama Phadate has expired. Registry to bring this fact to the notice of learned Civil Judge so that necessary corrective action can be taken. The application is disposed of as no orders are required to be passed. R. C. CHAVAN, J. SMA