IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 19th October, 2006 Second Bail Application No. 968 of 2006 Order on the bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Pratap Singh s/o Budhi Singh R/o Dhuria Harsan P.S. Bajpur District U.S. Nagar ….Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ……….Opposite Party Arising out of case crime No. 965 of 2006 Under Sections 395, 397, 412 IPC P.S. Bajpur District U.S. Nagar _____________________________________________________________ Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Heard Smt. Pushpa Joshi learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. Perused the record. This is a second bail application. The first bail application was rejected on merit. Co-accused, namely, Mahendra Singh has already been released on bail by the Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. vide order dated 29.08.2006. The learned counsel for the applicant contended that it is a case of parity. The facts and the role assigned in the commission of dacoity are similar. Learned A.G.A. has also conceded that it is a case of parity. It is a case of parity, therefore, it is a fit case for bail. Let the applicant-accused be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned. Dated 19.10.2006 LSR (J.C.S. Rawat, J.)