IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITIONNO. 92 OF 2005 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2967 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO. 2733 OF 2005 GRAUER & WELL (INDIA) LTD. ... PLAINTIFFS. VS. THE CENTRAL ORDINANCE DEPOT AND ANR. ... DEFENDANTS. MS. ASMIN WANDREWALA I/B. A. WANI FOR THE PLAINTIFFS. MR. MILIND MORE AGP FOR THE DEFENDANT- STATE. MS. S.I.SHAH WITH ANAMIKA MALHOTRA FOR DEFENDANT NO.1. Coram : S.K.Shah, J. Coram : S.K.Shah, J. Coram : S.K.Shah, J. Date : February 17, 2006. Date : February 17, 2006. Date : February 17, 2006. P.C. 1. The learned Counsel for the Respondent on taking instructions,makes a statement that they have complied with prayer (c) of the contempt petition. In view of this, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner does not want to press the contempt petition. The contempt petition therefore stands disposed of. Certified copy expedited. [S.K.Shah , J.] [S.K.Shah , J.] [S.K.Shah , J.]