THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.27870 OF 2010 DATED 8TH DECEMBER, 2011 BETWEEN Darbar Naresh …Petitioner And The Authorized Officer, State Bank of Hyderabad, Dubba (New Gunj) Branch, Nizamabad and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.27870 OF 2010 ORDER: By way of this writ petition, the petitioner assailed the action of the State Bank of Hyderabad in not accepting his bid amount of Rs.60,98,000/- in respect of the subject property at Khanapur Village, Kaloor Road, Nizamabad District, which was in his occupation under a lease. This Court, by order dated 10.11.2010, took note of the fact that the lessor of the petitioner was liable to pay a sum of over Rs.75,00,000/- to the Bank and that the leased premises in the possession of the petitioner were oﬀered as a security to the Bank. As the petitioner expressed willingness to clear the entire loan amount due and payable to the Bank by his lessor, this Court granted permission to the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.75,00,000/- on or before 31.12.2010. Subject to this condition, the Bank was directed not to evict the petitioner from the leased premises which were in his occupation. This Court also made it clear that if the petitioner committed any default in making the payment, the Bank was at liberty to ﬁnalize the auction conducted by it and also take suitable measures in accordance with law for evicting the petitioner. Though the petitioner ﬁled WPMP No.2455 of 2011 seeking extension of time to make the deposit as per the directions dated 10.11.2010, no orders were passed herein and the petitioner also did not pursue the same. Sri Ch.Siva Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank, now states that the petitioner failed to comply with the conditional order dated 10.11.2010 and consequently, the Bank ﬁnalized the auction of the leased premises and has also issued a sale certificate to the successful bidder. In that view of the matter, no further cause survives for consideration in this writ petition. It would be for the Bank or the successful bidder, as the case may be, to take necessary action in accordance with law for securing the possession of the subject premises. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. WPMP Nos.35543 of 2010 and 2455 of 2011 shall stand dismissed in consequence. No order as to costs. ____________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J. 8TH DECEMBER, 2011. PGS/VGSR