1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 347 OF 2007 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 347 OF 2007 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 347 OF 2007 WITH WITH WITH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2007 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2007 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2007 Jadeed Anjuman-E-Taleem & Ors. .. Appellants vs. Mansoori Shazila Naeem Akhtar & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr. S.K. Shinde i/by Sagar Kasar for Appellants. Mr. A.R. Shaikh for Respondent No. 1. Mr. R,N, Patne, AGP., for Respondent No. 2. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE: 12TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATE: 12TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATE: 12TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C. . Heard. 2. The only contention raised before us by the Appellant Institution is that the respondents services stood terminated on reduction of staff i.e. teachers due to retirement in the strength of students. 3. The reduction of students cannot be attributed 2 to the respondent teachers and, therefore, in the given facts and circumstances, the learned Single Judge was justified in holding that as the said respondent teachers were appointed on probation against clear vacancies, they have got a right to be absorbed in the event the strength of the school is reduced for no fault of theirs. We do not find any merit in these appeals. Both the Letters Patent Appeals are, therefore, dismissed. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, J.) (Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, J.) (Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, J.)