IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2011 / 14TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 36631 of 2010(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.J.CITTA, W/O.SABU ANTONY, AGED 29 YEARS, LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, THIRUVALAYANNUR HIGH SCHOOL, KALLUR- VADAKKEKKAD, CHAVAKKAD EDUCATIONAL DISTRICT, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC ISNTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHAVAKKAD-680506, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. THE MANAGER, THIRUVALAYANNUR HIGH SCHOOL, KALLUR- VADAKKEKKAD 679562, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. R1 TO R3 BY G.P. SMT. NISHA BOSE ADV. SRI.JIJO PAUL FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 36631 of 2010-D - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of January, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner herein is working as LPSA in the school managed by the fourth respondent from 11.7.2006, which has been approved also. She is aggrieved by the staff fixation order for the present year, viz. 2010-2011. In the light of the same, the petitioner has been retrenched. The petitioner has filed Ext.P3 revision petition before the Director of Public Instruction, the second respondent herein seeking to challenge the staff fixation order. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Manager and learned Govt. Pleader. 3. In the light of the fact that Ext.P3 statutory revision petition is filed by the petitioner, there will be a direction to the Director of Public Instruction to take a decision on Ext.P3 after hearing the petitioner and the Manager, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the second respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/