1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY : AURANGABAD BENCH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL ST. NO. 5391 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3928 OF 2007 Maharashtra RoadTransport Corporation, Ahmednagar Division, Ahmednagar. - - - Appellant versus Sayyad Asgar Akbar, age 62 years, occ. nil, R/o. Beldar Galli, Ahmednagar. - - - Respondent Shri M. K. Goyanka, Advocate for applicant. CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. Dated : 31st July 2009 PER COURT : 1 Appeal taken up for admission. 2. Heard Shri Goyanka, learned Counsel for the appellant. Learned Counsel submits that learned Single Judge erred in refusing prayer for interim relief when the petition is admitted. He submits that mere admission of the petition would serve no 2 purpose. 3. The petition, which was filed before the learned Single Judge, arises out of concurrent findings of facts. From the order passed by learned Single Judge, it appears that in view of concurrent findings of facts, learned Single Judge has refused to grant interim relief while granting Rule. Learned Single Judge has exercised the jurisdiction vested in him. It cannot be said that discretion has been exercised in erroneous manner. Appeal is, therefore, rejected. ( N.D. DESHPANDE, J. ) ( B. R. GAVAI, J. ) pnk/lpast539109