1 nmw122.11.sxw ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.122 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2568 OF 2002 Bhagwan J. Nitnaware & ors. ..Petitioners.. Vs. The Union of India & ors. ..Respondents. Mr. D.V.Gangal, advocate for applicant in Notice of Motion. Mr. G. Haribaran i/b. Dr.T.C.Kaushik, advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. A.M.Nathani, advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR & MRS MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE : MARCH 16, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. The first relief claimed in the Notice of Motion is for direction to the Respondent to implement decision/resolution No.131 in the meeting of the Board of Governors held on 26 th June, 2010. The fact that such meeting was held is not in dispute. Similarly, it is not in dispute that the resolution No.131 has already been 2 nmw122.11.sxw passed by the Board of Governors. The Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 however contend that decision taken in the said resolution can be given effect to only after approval is accorded by the Competent Authority. That approval is still awaited. So long as that approval is not granted, the concerned respondents cannot be directed to act upon the said resolution No.131 dated 26 th June, 2010, which is the relief prayed in the present Motion. Accordingly, no further order is required with regard to the prayer clause (a) of the Motion. 2 Insofar as prayer clause(b) for fixing early date of final hearing of the Writ Petition is concerned, the same is rejected. Instead, the Office is directed to place the Petition as per its turn under appropriate caption. (MRS MRIDULA BHATKAR, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)