IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.6971 of 1995 Between: M/s. Yashopriya Productions, rep.by its Proprietor Malladi Sheela, W/o Vinayaka Sarma, R/o Vijayawada, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND The Director, Door Darshan Kendra, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, declaring that the respondent cannot telecast the 194 Serials without taking any decision on the application of the petitioner by the Revising Committee. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.PANDURANGA RAO (Not present) Counsel for the Respondent: MR. P. Innayya Reddy and Mr. Koka Raghava Rao (SC for Door Darshan) The Court made the following : ORDER: None appears for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent represents that the cause in this writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become ‘infructuous’. No costs. ________________ (N.V. RAMANA, J) Date: 01.10.2004 Nsr To 1. The Director, Door Darshan Kendra, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad. 2. Two CD copies.