1 Cri.Revn.Appln. No.282 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.282 OF 2010 Babasaheb s/o Radhakishan Bade ... PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & anr. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri S.W. Mundhe, Advocate for the petitioner Shri V.H. Dighe, A.P.P. for respondent No.1. Shri A.M. Gholap, Advocate for respondent No.2 ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 6th January, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Mr. Gholap appears for original complainant/respondent No.2, files power. Mr. Mundhe for revision applicant and Mr. Gholap inform that the matter is settled between the parties, which is permitted to be compounded in terms of Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 2. In terms of the compromise, the amount of Rs.40,000/- deposited in this Court by the revision applicant on 1.12.2010 to be received by the original complainant (respondent No.2). The respondent No.2 would get total amount of Rs.77,490/- for which a cheque is issued, as reflected in clause (1) of the compromise. 3. In the light of compromise, in terms of Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the same is recorded. Revision allowed. 2 Cri.Revn.Appln. No.282 of 2010 The conviction imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, in S.C.C. No.538/2003 directing to undergo S.I. for six months and to pay compensation of Rs.80,000/- and to deposit the fine of Rs.500/- is quashed and set aside. The registry/ office to pay the amount of Rs. 40,000/- deposited in this Court to the respondent No.2 without any application. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cri282.10