............^lftq ^s^^ daieA.--" @^hii^i ^ ^•l^^M'^- 9<i^M%^^IL, ^^S^"^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGABHA JUDICATURE AT BIIASPUR. (t W.PS;No. 6°'^^ OF 2006. Petltloner Respondents ^ ^, ^ ^/" / ^ ^/~ 'y ^ .0?<e.~ y ';*' /-" Smt. Rajshri Nenon W/o Shri Sateesh Menon, Juniline, Id9ah Road, Bilaspur (C.G.). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarha Through the Secretary t . S<k;ffi. . . Department of H*g^.r Education, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur Dist-Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner Tribunal Welfare Department of Chhattisgarha Government Raipur 3. The Commissioner, Public Instruction Raipur Division Raipur- (C.G.) WRIT PETITION 0/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^:'- 31^51^ R-iiebsn^i Shtfltidfel aiflw l,;- padma ^^ cf 'ySS^WvPf, ^•rflw'16, RlMWy •nwiraiwi^s^'.^l Ri<>«d ?R; '200-b 311^1 <+<IIWfff?t( 16.11.2006 Shri Arun Kumar Agralf Smt Anju Ahuja, &y fi^ t-teard. It is not disputed b^ Adminjstrative Tribunal m reached its fhwlity. Having cons13ered ar| both the part'ies and wi'thoul the case, it is directed representation along with Authority within a period of | shall decide •that represental of 30 days from the da^ consideringall the points rai the order passed by Ihe No.1452/1998. Witii Ihe aforesaid °hl<lfi-<41-f MIMftl ff fe^t <Rl<^K ^)3Tf^IT3n^T »al,counsel for the petitwner. for the respondents / State. the State that the order passed by M No.1482/1998 dated 31.01.2000 has juments odvnnced by teamed counsel for expressing any opinion on -the meritof [Ihat petitioner may submit detaited dppy of this petition to the Competent |one monlh from today; and trfio, in tum fon in an objective nuainer within a period ;t^ of receipt of representation after i^ed by the petitioner and the impact of Tribunal dated 31.01.2000 m the OA dirtction, a>(«- V.K. Shrivastava Judge (ift^^f^)