IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.IC)No. (£819 OF 2009. K/ Sahzad Ali, Son of Saiyyed Ahmed Ali, aged about 32 years, R/o. C—18, Sector -5, Devendra Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (c. G.). PETITIONER VERSUS M“ \ 7 RESPONDENTS :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Transport Department, D..S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. gVRegional Transport Authority, Raipur,-Region, D. K. s. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA a The petitioner named above begs to submit as under:- 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As given in the above cause title. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENT: As given in the above cause title. K HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 6079 of 2009 PETITIONER : Sahzad Ali. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & another. Present: WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Alok Bakshi, Government Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed 011 24" day of October, 2009) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instinctions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage. However, the respondent-authorities may be directed to consider and decide his pending application dated 27th February, 2008 (Annexure P/l) in accordance with law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible. Shri Bakshi, learned Government Advocate for the respondents submits that there is no reason asto why the application of the petitioner, as stated above, should not be considered expeditiously. Shri Bakshi submits that the aforestated application shall be considered andudecided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In View of the clear statement made by learned dotinsel appearing for the respondents, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. Accordingly, the petition is disposedogywgortterasto cost. Sd/— nnjnrK.AGNHnnnuW Judge 3 ,{,7‘ .‘