HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR D.B: Hon’ble Shri Sullil Kmmar Sinha, Hon’ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishrg, JJ. ' 5 Writ Aggeal No. 48 of 2011, 1. Mohd. iKutubuddin aged about 35’ years, S/o Mohd Kasim R/o Rasulppr, Ambikapur Distt. Sargujd ' APPELLANT’S M/s Raza Enterprises, Proprietor Mohd. Jilani Khan S/o Mohd. Kasim Khan Aged about 41-1 years, R/o Rasoolpur, mbika‘pur Distt. Sarguja through its power of Attorney. older Mohd. Mukhtar S/o /Mohd. Sattar aged about 44 years, R/o Rasoolpur Ambikapur Distt. Sarguja RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary . Commercial Tax Depaltment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest Produce (T & D), Cooperatives \‘ I. ggearance: ‘ ‘ ' 3 Mr. Yogesh Chandra, Advocate for the appellants. . Federation Ltd. A-25, VIP Club Khamrdih, Shanker Nagar, Raipur ' Commissioner Commercial Tax, Vanijyik Kar Bhawan, r Civil Lines, Raipur A iMr. A.S. KachWaha, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents. ' ‘ ‘ WT APPE UNDER SECTION 2 OF THE HIGH COURT OF CI-IHATTISGARH gAPPEAL TO'DIVISION BENCQACT 2006 A H ORAL ORDER (06 05(2011) , Following oral order of the Court was passed by e Sunil Kumar Sinhg J. Heard IA No2 clalmmg exempnon from filmg certified copy 1s allowed The appellants axe exempted from flhng the cemiled copy of l the unpugned order. IA No.3 for grant of permission to hle joint appeal is also g allowed Heard on IA No 01/201 1, an apphcatron for condonation of [delay 1n frlrng the appeal V l r"? l The appellants are permxtted to me the Jomt appeal On due consrderatton of the subm1ssrons made by learned counsel for the parttes we are satrsfred that the appellants have shown suhictent cause for not flhng the appeal 1n trme and the delay 1n filmg the appeal deserves to be condoned IA No 01/2011 rs allowed and the delay 1n hhng the appeal ls hereby condoned i Accordrngly, Learned counsel for the partles are also heard on adrmssron Thrs appeal 1s d1rected against a common order dated L01/10/2010 passed m a batch of wnt petttrons Agamst the sald Qcomrnon order many wnt appeals meludmg WA No 452/2010 d. It is stated at bar that all the wrrt appeals tiled agamst the leommon order have been dismissed by a Division Bench of this ‘ Court by a common wdgment dated 19 of Apnl 2011 :were file Learned counsel for the appellants submrts that this appeal may also be dismissed/drsposed of m terms of the above common . judgment dated 19m of April, 2011 passed in W.A.‘No. 452/2010 and i ther connected ’writ appeals. o 6 \C In View of the above, the present rit Appeai is dismissed in teims of the common judgment dated 19m of Afaril, 2011 passed in above batch of writ appeals. Certihe copy as er, rules. Sd/— 4., SUNH. KUMAR SINH i’ L J Judge d p /, 1'73 A V Sdl- Présnant Kumar Mishr Jude mtw" a g