IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2091 of 2006 MUKESH KUMAR Versus SMT.KUMARI PRITI ----------- 2. 12.8.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, an amount of Rs. 1000/- by way of monthly maintenance cannot be said to be either illegal or excessive. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the wife, opposite party, is living in adultery and her paramour is looking after her. However, when this Court wanted to know as to what was the evidence to this effect, counsel for the petitioner very frankly conceded that he does not have any evidence for the present and that he will hunt for the same in a period of ten days. This exercise in fact was to be done by the petitioner in the court below and he having failed to avail the opportunity given by the court below in this regard cannot be allowed to raise such plea before this Court at the stage of a civil revision application. Consequently this civil revision application is wholly misconceived, which is 2 hereby dismissed with a direction to the court below to ensure that the amount arrears and current towards maintenance in terms of the impugned order is realized from the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. ( Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/