1 11.wp7776.11 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7776 OF 2011 Smt. Kamalagauri T. Parekh. ....Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ....Respondents Mr. Manoj Kondekar, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. S.D. Rayrikar, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM:- GIRISH GODBOLE, J DATED:- DECEMBER 16, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Advocate for Petitioner. The impugned Order passed by the learned DDRCS, Mumbai(1) City in so far as it directs the Assistant Register to delete the amount of third installment and interest from the recovery certificate is in favour of the Petitioner. However, the Petitioner has raised dispute even in respect of first and second installment which has not been considered. 2. It is therefore directed that after the Assistant Registrar decides the proceedings of recovery certificate afresh pursuant to the impugned order 2 11.wp7776.11 the Petitioner will be at liberty to file fresh revision application and challenge the recovery certificate in so far as and in case the said recovery certificate also grants recovery certificate in respect of first and second installments. It would also be open to the Petitioner to raise dispute about first and second installment before the Assistant Registrar. Even in that regard the grievance of the Petitioner shall be taken into consideration by the Assistant Registrar. Subject to this clarifications, Writ Petition is not entertained. The same is disposed off. (GIRISH GODBOLE, J)