IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 25156 of 2006 Between: 1 The Primary Agriculture Co.operative Society, Vemanpally, Vemanpally Mandal, Adilabad District, Rep. by its Secretary/Chief Executive Officer, Thallapally Laxman Goud S/o.Malla Goud, R/o.Vemanpally vg. & Mandal, Adilabad District. 2 The Adilabad District Co.operative Central Bank, Chennur Branch, rep. by its Manager Ch.Janardhan S/o.Raji REddy, R/o.Chennur village, Adilabad District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The District Collector, Adilabad. 2 The Special Deputy Collector (LA) Neelwai Project, Mancherial, Adilabad District. 3 Pupireddy Mondekka W/o.Lachi Reddy R/o.Mangenapally village, Vemanpally Mandal, Adilabad District. 4 Pupireddy Rosi Reddy S/o.Lachi Reddy R/o.Mangenapally village, Vemanpally Mandal, Adilabad District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 & 2 herein for payment of the compensation in respect of the lands Sy.No.13 extent Ac.0.28 gtrs; Sy.No.14 extent Ac.0.35 gts. And Sy.No.15 extent 0.29 gts. of the 3rd respondent and the land in Sy.No.25 extent Ac.1.23 gts. (out of Ac.3.09 gts. Mortgaged land is Ac.1.23 gts.) of 4th respondent situated at Katepally vg., Vemanpally Mandal, Adilabad Dist. which were acquired by the Govt. for public purpose i.e., to wit for excavation of submergence under Neelwai project, Adilabad which were mortgaged by the respondents 3 and 4 herein with the first petitioner herein for obtaining agricultural loan i.e., for purchasing a tractor or to refer the matter to the civil court for adjudication with regard to entitlement of the compensation by the petitioners under Sec. 18 or 30 of the L.A. Act by duly declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in not considering the representation dt. 26.3.2006 submitted by the first petitioner society for stopping the payment of compensation amount in order to settle the same in favour of the writ petitioners herein by passing appropriate award in accordance with the provisions of L.A. act or not referring the same to the civil Court under the provisions of L.A.Act is nothing but arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and violative of the procedure envisaged under the provisions of L.A act 1894. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.RAVI KIRAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KURR} The Court made the following : O R D E R:- Sri V.Ravi Kiran Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, addressed a letter dated 27.3.2008 to the Registry stating that the Chief Executive Officer, P.A.C.S., Vemanpally, has instructed him to withdraw the writ petition, as such, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. _______________ 28.03.2008 bcj