sciai i-3/.•s.€~sw fiSS^ i:^9<3 TO THB HIOH COURT OP JWOICATURE AT B)EIASI»im (CHHAmSQARHt WRIT PENTIOK »«>.;-ff^ 1 2006. {S.B.? PETITIOSERSs- ...•""\rA^" ^ o^ ...••?o)P" ..--•' ^..-^^i ^^>y AOVOCATE'^p^ ^ (M) ^- 0. R®SPOWDBa«TS: 1. S.ti.Swas^a., Ass-53 Years S/o Late Shri Saldiaram Dcvaagaa By Occupati&n: - Sub-Inspector (M) Hoiae guard HQR Raipur. / 2. T.R. Siaha, Age-59 Yrs. S/o Sfari Late BaisaUiiaaca Sinha By Occupation: - Subedar (M) Home ^iaxdH.Q. ^ipur. / 3. SaJesbSii^t Age-35Years S/0 Shri B.R Singh steno^apber Occupation: - Home guard H.Q. Raipur. -.4. B.S. <3«!-lQrWrAge. 54 years S/o Shri R.P. Smgb SJ. (M) Occupatioa:. Home guard H.Q. Raipur 5. ItP. Paadey Age.50 years S/o Late SImJ.P. Pandey Occupation: -Sub-Inspector Home guardRPR 6.^ K.K.aUsItia Age.^-e.?ew!rS '' Yrs S/o Shri Naval Kishor Mishra Occupation: - Sub- Iiispector (M) Honie guard H.Q. Ifeupur 7. Btolteadta Kmnar Iialiare Age. 45year S/o. Latel Ram Lahri e. Occupation:'aStA~£-«Afie&^a^l4) H.Q.R Raipur , 8. PA. Sin^ Aged 49 Years 8/o Late,Shri Ralnesbver Singh Sub- Inspector (M) Hoiae Guard H Q Raipur ^9. T.tt. Saltn Aged 46 Years S/o late Shri Sfaankar Lal Sahu Sub- tnspector (M) Horne Guard R.P.R ^ 10. B.B. Skbfa'e Aged 45 years S/o late sfari Shivcfaaran Sldiare Sub- Inspector (M) Home <}uard 11. S.K.BlwgatAgCTl47yearsS/0. late shriEknat BhagatSub- Inspector (M) Home Guard 12. A.R. Sahu S/o Kaliram Sahu age 47 year Sub- Inspector (M) Home Guard R.P.R. Raipur -:VERSCS:- 1. The State ofCbhatttsgaA Through The Secretaiy, Home & Police AFFAIR8, D.K.S.Mantrataya Bhavan, Raipur{C.G.$ ^ Tl»Se«*ta»y» PtBauwe l.K.S.Mantrafaya. Bhavan, Raipur {C.G.} Tl»WxwstW GeasssitOtyiame ®BKada,WansSi Camp, Raipur{C.G.} Seater StaffOtBew HomfiQuai'ds Mana Camp ,Raipur, Raipur(C.Q.) ^ mffiC^S?aTO<W ICTiBHEa AKCTCI.B236/!M!70»TBE coi rannRoir<^auaAKMftTaE®soA»^ _5BBKmO»(SL OR ORD^jm^ 2. 3. /*• • 1 l'^-.^:. ys, ^TpnrPi.'^'tftwiS, kwW WtSPIT%flraiixn-p-^M3:46^ s^w,^. K-fl* Sfl^ aFqNi"BfCT 3n$?i?wwHi¥B ^T^?TzfN 'HTR'^f "^ 'f^^ <S^l^i< ^a^nsi!^! Shri PmkiashTsweiri, Advocat^ fo" the petitjonefs. Shri Ashutosh Kachwaha, Dy. Heard. $y ths instant petition the Inspec^or (M) in t-iome ©uards,St4+e of Chhattisgarh have questioned the lega'ity, propriety & correctness c. 6.8.2005 has been withdrawn aid 'Govt. Adv. ftir the State. petitioners, who are working .as Sub- order dated 24.1.2006 (Annexure P-1) dent No.4-5eniot .Staff Officer, Home '5uards, Raipur whereby' the ad-hoc increase 'in tjie salary given by'eariiep ord.er do'f'ed it hds furthsr been directed that the payment already mada be recovera^ frpm the petstloners, as SoveFnmsnt's order in this "ecjar'd isawaited. ! . . ' 'Leamed counsel for the pe'fitioners submitted that other smitarly situated employees are getting th^ some benefit and the petition&rs wer-e also extenaed the said benefit inj pursuance of this Court's ora'er dated t '6.4.2005 passed in W.P.(S) No.15^5/05. Counsel further submits that the order dated 4.7.2005 (Annexure ^-8) passed by ths State.Sovernnient is very claar arid the'cose ofthe peti1|ioners isaiready'covered by Annexur'e P- 3, as they are the empioyees of Nfegar Sena which 'is included in the order dafed 4.7.2005 (Annexure P-8) <? ', nt-i [i'he State 6'overnment, therefofe, order imnijanea jg illeqa!. — ^e? [Tt^ s.Rsi4) HC-22 ^?K - •-3^ ^fflRTq, "S^OTs, tWray •Sn^TqiT Ifera'anin ^'RT^"?1!?^ sn^iTCTw'Hftg 2 •wferhiiin?if 4 fe^ 'd^RgTt 'a; siPtiq 3II$?[ te:.^ HovinQ heard ieamed counse; record. Increase of~ Rs.70/- In the *1. f this Court's order "or the parties, 1 haye perua pcy of the petitioners was mcde ^ tn ddted 26.4.2005 passed 'n W.P.(S) No.1555/05, that order was passeij on ths ground of parity because in pursucnce of order of the State Ad^nis^rstwe Tribunal Bench at Jabajpur in fA-A. No.218/01 and order dctec| 10.12.2004 passed 'by the M.P. High Court, Bench at (Swclior.in W.P. N4.3113/04 similarly situated employees \ wereallowed *o dpcw the incr-sase qf Rs.ZO/-, therefors, the order dated' 4.7.2005 (Annexure P-S) was passed [?y the Sov'ernment. In the .circun'sStcinces, "ri'se jihpugned orde" passed by' respondent No.4-5enior Stuff Officer, Home ^•uards, Raipur'is liable to be quashed. According'y, the petition is aibwsd and impugned orde.r dated 24.1.20Q6. (.Annexurs P-1) is, nsfsby, qucshed. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.88^/06 also stonds disposed of. Certifisd copy o.s pe",ru!es. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge rr ["i^^rt