IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6134 of 1987 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- A U SHUKLA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR RJ OZA for Petitioner MS HANSA PUNANI for Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA Date of decision: 03/03/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Challenge made in this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is the dismissal order dated 13.11.1987 passed by State of Gujarat on the grounds stated in the impugned order. Rule was issued on the petition. After issuance of rule in the petition the petitioner made representation to the State Government for reduction of the penalty and the State Government has reduced the penalty on the said representation made by the petitioner by converting the order of dismissal into that of an order of compulsory retirement. 2. In view of the above circumstances, learned advocate Mr. Oza does not press the petition and seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Learned A.G.P. has no objection if permission to withdraw the petition is granted. 3. In the result, the petition is disposed of as it is withdrawn with no order as to costs. Rule is discharged. 3.3.2000. (A.M.Kapadia, J.) --- (karan)