[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.1005 OF 2007 Anil Laxman Korgaonkar ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.Prem Sood advocate for applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh A.P.P. for the State Mr.S.Bhattacharji Spl.P.P. for C.B.I. ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : MARCH 29, 2007 DATE : MARCH 29, 2007 DATE : MARCH 29, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant, learned special counsel for C.B.I. and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is apprehending arrest in view of the notice received by him calling upon him to produce some documents which are mentioned in the said notice. In my view, the following order should meet the ends of justice: 3. In case, respondent-Central Bureau of Investigation wants the custody of the applicant, [-2-] they shall give three working days notice to the applicant prior to arrest. On notice being given, the applicant shall prefer the necessary application for anticipatory bail before the concerned Sessions Court. The Sessions Court shall dispose of the said application in accordance with law. 3. Application is disposed of. [ V.K.Tahilramani, J.]