IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2009 / 4TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 17638 of 2009(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.PRABHAKARAN, S/O.CHANDU, PATTAYIL HOUSE, P.O.MATTATHUR, KOTTAKKAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. BY GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).17638/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 25th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner who operates a regular stage carriage, sought for a revision of his own timings. Petitioner submitted his request before the respondent, but the same was rejected. In revision, by Ext.P1 STAT directed the original authority to reconsider the petitioner's request. Petitioner's grievance arises out of the delay in further steps being taken pursuant to Ext.P1. 2. I heard learned Government Pleader also. If a decision has not been taken pursuant to Ext.P1, respondent shall proceed to do so within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Obviously, this shall be done after boarding the petitioner's request in a timing conference and considering the objections of the other operators as well. Writ petition is disposed of as above. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs