mt. Q/P {W ® $§NGLE BEM£R° IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 1C.G.[ ‘ w.P.s No........%.E.$%....../2010 RashmiLahre D/o Shri Vedram Lahre, Aged about 23 Years R/o Bhathagaon, Post office Kosir, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (CG) PETITIONER: VERSUS i RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department of Panchayat and Rural Development D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector District Raigarh (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer District Panchayat 'Raigarh (CG) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As state& above in the cause title. Vi WELT mwPQVNv mm (Wu) .?5$ o 200 Mam WWW WWW WW‘3WW §§3imm SB: Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 19.7.2010 Shri Vamn Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt l 85 2, on advance copy. Heard. Advocate for the State] respondents No. counsel for the petitioner is that the ointinentto the post of Shiksha Kanm he process of selection. After selection, Lnd it is the case of the petitioner that having obtained 44.5O marks. Further be held on 28.9.2008, the p with regard to the counselir during the course of counselin Learned counsel for tt petitioner has made various including respondent No.3lC Raigarh, but till date, no ac1 petitioner. Taking into consideration the nature of grievance raised, at this stage, it would be appropriate to direct respondent No.3/Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Raigarh to look into the grievance of Submission of learned petitioner had applied for ap} Grade-II and participated in 1 the select list was prepared a petitioner secured 18th rank case of the petitioner is that ough the counseling was scheduled to 'tioner did not receive any information .g and therefore could not participate 3: 3 te petitioner further submits that the representations to diderent authorities hief- Executive Ohicer, Jila Panchavat, ion has been taken in the case of the Wm m zoo In case, the grievance 1 Iiberty to take recourse to 51 under the law. off. the patitioner, as ventilated considsr the sams in accordan cc with law. The decision on petition 3 months from ths date of recc to him through representation, and er’s representation shall be taken within ipt ‘ of copy of this order. With the aforesaid direc1 ions, the petition stands nnally disposed g¢ wsta unw: Sd/— Manindra Mohan Shrivastava i Judge s not redressed, petitioner would be at {ch remedy as may be available to her mammwwz) WWW ammm WWW?! .—«'2’_’ mw Wm $aimm