1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5986 OF 2007. Prem Sajandas Basantani .Vs. State of Mah. & Ors. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA & C. L. PANGARKAR, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 29, 2008 The petitioner has prayed for direction against the respondents to take action as per Section 11 of Bombay Local Fund Audit Act 1930, pursuance to the Audit Report of Municipal Council Hinganghat. Apart from the reply by respondent No. 4 there is a pursis filed on behalf of respondent No.3, the contents of which are reproduced as under: “In view of the order passed by this Hon'ble Court on 30/04/2008, the respondent No.3, is filing pursis, to the effect that, the respondent No. 3 has initiated proceedings against 38 persons in total 5 matters and show cause notices were issued to them. The matter was fixed on 25.04.2008, for appearance. The concerned persons have engaged their respective counsel in the matter. The respondent No. 3, is 2 appointed as an observer for the legislative assembly election in Karnataka State and therefore she is not available till 10.5.2008. As the proceedings are already initiated and taking into consideration the number of persons, it is necessary to grant an opportunity of submitting their explanation and hearing to each and every person in the matter, it will take time to pass the final order.” In view of this nothing survives in the petition. It is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE svk