HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No.31036 of 2011 ORDER: Challenging the Notice No.AB/MC3/893/M, dated 20-07-2011, issued by the 4th respondent, informing the petitioner that the orders of the Government in G.O.Rt.No.165, Irrigation &Cad (PWLAI) Department, dated 26-02-2005 on cancellation of lease which was granted in favour of the petitioners in respect of the lands in Regulanka village, Atreyapuram Mandal, East Godavari District, for development of Bio-Diesel Plantation and other plantations in G.O.Rt.No.1792, Irrigation and CAD (IRR.I.II) Department, dated 22-12-2004, shall hold good, the present writ petition has been filed. 2. The issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.25879 of 2011, dated 15-09-2011, wherein it was held that “the respondent No.1 is directed to issue a notice to the petitioners inviting their objections in the event it proposes to cancel the leases earlier granted in their favour. On the expiry of the time stipulated for filing such objections, respondent No.1 shall consider the same, if any, filed and pass an appropriate order as to whether to continue the leases granted to the petitioners or cancel the same.” 3. The impugned proceedings vide notice No.AB/MC3/893/M, dated 20-07-2011, issued by the 4th respondent-Executive Engineer Godavari Head Works Division, Dowlaiswaram, were also under challenge by three of the aggrieved parties, and that the licence of the another person, who challenged the similar notice, was cancelled. Further, no notice was given to the petitioner before canceling the lease. 4. The impugned order is liable to be set aside in view of the orders passed in W.P.No.25879 of 2011, dated 15-09-2011. Hence, it is accordingly set aside and the 1st respondent is directed to issue notice to the petitioner inviting his objections, in the event, if he proposes to cancel the lease earlier granted in favour of the petitioner, and thereafter, after receipt of objections, the 1st respondent shall take appropriate decision in accordance with law. 5. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. ___________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 24th November 2011 kvr