IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.1041 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 24.8.2010 Mahesh Chand … Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.M.Kumar Hon’ble Ms.Justice Ritu Bahri Present: Mr.Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.Kumar, J. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letter Patent is directed against judgment dated 30.4.2010, rendered by learned Single Judge, holding that the mere fact that respondent Nos.4 and 5 have obtained higher marks in the interview, would not constitute a valid ground to suspect the bona fide of the members of the interview board. It may be true that in the academic area, the writ petitioner-appellant might have better academic performance as compared to respondent Nos.4 and 5 but that does not necessarily lead to the conclusion that member of the interview board were biased against the writ petitioner-appellant and in favour of respondents No.4 and 5 especially when there was not even any such allegation of mala fide. The appeal is wholly without any merit and the same is dismissed. (M.M.Kumar ) Judge (Ritu Bahri) Judge 24.08.2010 LPA No.1041 of 2010 sd 2