VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 588 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 510 of 2008 Uday Maruti Aanvekar Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr. Milind Parab & Associates, for the Applicant. Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for the Respondent. CORAM : Mrs. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATE : JUNE 18, 2008. PC :- . Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. The applicant has been convicted under section 324 of I. P. Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year. The applicant is now seeking bail. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant was on bail during the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. This statement is not controverted by the prosecution. The learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that the sentenced imposed on the applicant is only for one year and the appeal is not - 2 - likely to be heard within the said period. Moreover, he submitted that the applicant has good case on merits. 3. Looking to the above facts and the evidence on record, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant and pass following order. _O_R_D_E_R_ . On fine amount being paid, the applicant be released on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. . The applicant shall report to Vile-Parle Police Station once in a fortnight till the disposal of the appeal. . Application is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- [ Smt. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.]