/.r""" •• 5 X;'K£°S^ Q®(S=.sXI-HC—78 •y *<I*ICTI a>*ii<»» ^°r -^wwi, yal-a'is, (°«ni'M'j,< ...)xa..cc........^.o.|..?..^.•^.200 an^i'q^? ('yi^si^i) sn^i w h-»* "(WT •Sn^T St»H ^l ''"'f TOiiw^ifcisn^i U/lin'ikL Versus CHhattisgarh State Power Distribution Co. Ltd. (A|Successor Company of Chhattisgarh State Ei^ctricity Board), Tifra, Bilaspur (CG) Ct- (C ;'i>f .-°"•'>&t' Shi'l Sushi! Sahu, learned c Heard. The applicant has fiied thi; fordeciding the representation oi sarne cou!d not be decided as p dated 6.1.2009 in WP(s)7116/Q Sfate Electricity Board and othei being in force due to Lok Sabha ^ For the reasons indicated the affidavit of Shri PM Rao] appiication is aliowed. Time fo| applicant is extended up to 15 A| ctt(<<i<i<fli i?m^f ^f fs^ <f<i<^i< ^siRiitaii^r endra Mishra, J \k Kumar Chourasia, S/o Late Shri Sushi lourasia, aged about 40 years, R/o fkunthpur, Raigarh, Tehsil & District Raigarh ounsel for the appiicant. ..appiication and prayed for extension oftime the non-applicant by 15 Aprii, 2009 as the sr directions of this Court passed vide order 3, A!ok Kurnar Chourasia Vs. Chhattisgarh 's, on account of Eiection Code of Conduct iection. n the appiication, which is also supported by Superintending Engineer, CSPDCL, the r deciding the representation of the non- 3rii,2009. .-——— Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge