[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE C.A.NO.1300 OF 2009 C.A.NO.1300 OF 2009 C.A.NO.1300 OF 2009 IN IN IN F.A.NO.369 OF 2009 F.A.NO.369 OF 2009 F.A.NO.369 OF 2009 IN IN IN L.C.SUIT NO.5663 L.C.SUIT NO.5663 L.C.SUIT NO.5663 OF 2003 OF 2003 OF 2003 Shaukat Gaus Khan ..Applicant Vs. Municipal Corporation for Brihanmumbai & ors. ..Respondents .... Mr.Raj Khuds i/b C.Y.Tanawade Advocate for Applicant Mr.Vinod Mahadik for Respondent No.1. Ms.Sangita A.Musle for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. .... CORAM:SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM:SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM:SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE :APRIL 2, 2009 DATE :APRIL 2, 2009 DATE :APRIL 2, 2009 1. Heard. 2. The learned counsel for Respondent Nos.3 and 4 states that possession of the premises has already been given to Hanifa Banu who is sister of the appellant. Appellant is seeking relief against Hanifa Banu, however, she is not even a party in the present matter. Prima facie, having regard to the material on record and the above position, no case is made out for grant of any interim relief. 3. Application is rejected. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]