IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2011 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1933 RP.No. 414 of 2011() -------------------- (W.P.(C) 16790 OF 2007 OF THIS COURT.) REVIEW PETITIONER: (PETITIONER IN WRIT PETITION) --------------------------------------------------- S.SADANANDAN, KOLLARAKKAL HOUSE, P.O.ELATHUR, CALICUT - 673 303. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE RESPONDENTS: (RESPONDENTS IN THE WRIT PETITION) ------------------------------------------------- 1. AIRPORT DIRECTOR, AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, CALICUT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, CALICUT - 673647 2. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, TM/COMML, CALICUT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, CALICUT - 673647 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE RANGE RAMANATTUKARA, RAMANATTUKARA, KOZHIKODE - 673003. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CALICUT DIVISION, C.R.BUILDING, MANACHIRA, CALICUT - 673001. ADV. SRI.JOHN VARGHESE,SC,CEN.BOARD OF EXCIS FOR R3 & R4 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.P. 414/2011 APPENDIX ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A1- TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENTS ALONG WITH THE COVERING LETTER. ANNEXURE AII TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 25.9.2010, ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER. ANNEXURE III TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 7.10.2010, ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE AIV TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 21.1.2008, ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE AV TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN NO. G.A.R.-7 DATED 6.8.2007. ANNEXURE AVI TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 7.1.2011. ANNEXURE AVII TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 22.3.2011. ANNEXURE AVIII TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 17.1.2011 IN CIVIL APPEAL 483/2011. ANNEXURE AIX CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.7.2010 IN W.P.(C) 16790/2007. // TRUE COPY // P.S. TO JUDGE. knc/- C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & P.S. GOPINATHAN, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = R.P. NO. 414 OF 2011 = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2011 O R D E R C.N. Ramachandran Nair, J. We have heard the learned counsel for the review petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that the first respondent has not complied with the judgment because the receipt issued is a receipt for payment made towards liability of the Airports Authority of India. Even though the petitioner's allegation is correct, the judgment does not require any modification and it would be open to the review petitioner to file a contempt application. Accordingly, we close the review petition leaving freedom to the petitioner to file contempt application to proceed against the first respondent for appropriate action. sd/- C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, (JUDGE) sd/- P.S. GOPINATHAN, (JUDGE) knc/-