/i.-^ \^;. ^ S 'RI \ ^y ^/ 6°> ^^- ;:f HICai C20URT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPUR SB : HQBrBLB SHm JUSTICB PKITIMKBR DIWAKBR W.P.J221n WO. 2041/2009 PBTl'nONBR Kaxiker Roadways, Througfa fh.e Maiiagmg Partner, Preetam Singh Garcha, S/o< Late Jogeadar Sing, aged about 59 yeara, R/o. Civil Lines, Raipur (CC?) (AppUcaiit before fhe R.T.A,) Versus RBSPONDBNTS 1. Regional Traasport Aufhorily, G.B. Road, Opposite Lal Gao.ga Shoppiag Mall, Raipur (CG) 2. Mafhan Lal, S/o. Magan Lal, aged about 35 years, C/o< Mahendra Travels, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) (AppUcaat before the R.T.A.) WRIT PBTITION XIMDBR ARHCa-B 227 OP THB CONST!TOT!ON OP mDIA Aooearaace: Shri S,K,Bajpai, counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Arun Soo, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondent No. 1, ORALORDBR (24.04.2009) At the outset, Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State/resp. No, 1 submits that there is ao. altemative reiiaj^dy available to the petitioner for approachmg the State Traasport AppeUate Tribunal. Counsel for the petitioaer subxaita fhat at present, post of Prcsidmg ofiicer iti State Traasport Appellate Tribuixal is lyiag vacant 91 Shri Sao has produced a copy of tfae oider dated 17.4.2009 passed by the State Goveram^it regardiag appom.tment of Shri Ashok Kiimar Nimonkar as fhe Prcsidmg Officer offhe State Traasport AppeUate Tribunal. , In view of this fact, counsel for fhe petitioner waats to withdraw the presentwnt petition with Uberty to approach the State Transport Appellate Tribunal by filing revisioxi, Accordiagly, fhe petition is dismissed as withdrawn wifh liberty as aforcsaid. However, it is dirccted that ilthe petitioner files fhe revision beforc the State Traiispoft Appellate Tribunal the same shall be decided expeditiously. Registty is directed to rctuni the certified copy of fhe order dated 28.01.2009 passed by tihie Regioxial Traiisport Aufhority provided that duly attested Xerox copy of fhe saine is ftiraished by the counsel for tiie petitioi^r. ..^ow^el ^v-y