THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.14274 of 2007 ORDER: Anakapalle Municipality, respondent No.2 herein, initiated steps for widening of a road within the municipal limits. Small part of the building bearing No.13-1-5 was affected. The petitioner states that the said property was owned by her son, but it was purchased by her. The grievance of the petitioner is that no compensation was paid for the land of about 9 square yards, which was utilised for the purpose of widening of the road. Respondent No.2 filed a counter-affidavit. It is stated that negotiations were undertaken before the demolition took place and compensation of Rs.13,583/- was paid to the son of the petitioner through a cheque, dated 25.05.2005, and that the petitioner never raised any objection. According to it, the dispute between the petitioner and her son must be settled elsewhere. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner is under the impression that the compensation was not paid for the portion of the property that was affected in the widening of the road. In categorical terms, respondent No.2 stated that a sum of Rs.13,583/- was paid as compensation. Though the petitioner is said to have purchased the property, the entries in the revenue records continued to be in the name of her son. Therefore, the respondents cannot be required to pay the compensation to the petitioner that too after it has been paid to her son. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dt.10.03.2011. kdl