. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.1949 of 2010 (O & M) Date of Decision: 17.05.2011 Jai Gopal ……Appellant Versus Sunit Kumar and others …...Respondents Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. Present: Mr. Maharaj Kumar, Advocate for the appellant. L.N. MITTAL, J (ORAL) Notices to respondent Nos.1 and 2 could not be issued as correct addresses were not furnished inspite of last opportunity. Counsel for the appellant states that the appellant has not supplied correct addresses of respondent Nos.1 and 2. It is thus apparent that the appellant is no longer interested in prosecuting the instant second appeal. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (L. N. MITTAL) JUDGE 17.05.2011. A.kaundal