‘Si/ CF/w// IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAspUR w. P. l s 1 No. Hé111? /2006 , PETITIONER .v : Vinod Kumar Gupta, S/o Shri Amardev / Gupta, aged about 43 years, Assist. L/ / Teacher Prunary School Barladlh Clrcle 1’s...My ... Balrampur w Educatlonal Dlstrlctl Ramanujgan} Dlstt - SurUuJa (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Education Department,D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Collector, Surguja Ambikapur, Distt. _— Surguja (C.G.J The Block Education Officer, Tribal ' Development Block 85 Tahsil — Pal, District — Surguja, (CTG.). r WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22g} 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT DIRECTION ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER $ 1. Ptticnlai: _!_-_l_!_GH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARmQLgASPug SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNlHOTRl, J. W.P. !Sl No.46?7 of 2006 Vinod Kumar Gupta PET!TIONE VERSUS RESPONDENTS _ State of Chhattisgarh and others. Present: Shri Bhupendra Singh, counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. G. A. for the State/ respondents. ORAL ORDER {Passed on 21 st September, 2006) Learned counset appearing for the State-respondents fairty submits that the impugned orders dated 07-07—2006 and 20-07-2006 (Annexure P/1 and P/2) passedzby the Collector, Surguja Ambikapur, respondent No. 2. is bad in law. According to learned counsel for the respondents, the petitioner belongs to School Education Department and by the impugned order the petitioner has been transferred to Tribal Welfare Department, which is not the parent department of the. petitioner. (2) ln view of the above submission made by learned counsel for the respondents-State, this petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 07-07-2006 (Annexure P/1) and order dated 20-07-2006 in respect of the petitioner stand quashed. No order as to costs. Kev/nah; Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotr'i Judge