CWP No. 4279 of 2011 -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 4279 of 2011 Date of Decision: July 13, 2011 Dr. Naranjan Ram …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. S.S. Hira, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suvir Sehgal, Addl. A.G., Punjab for respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4. Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Advocate for respondent No.2. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenges the Condition No. 13(a)(i) as mentioned in eligibility criteria against 60% seats in Post Graduate Degree for PCMS/ PCMS (Dental)/ PDES. 2. Mr. K.S. Dadwal, learned counsel for respondent No.2 has stated that in pursuance of Clause 13(c), the quota has been diverted in accordance with the stipulation made in that clause. Even after diversion of quota as per the stipulation, the petitioner CWP No. 4279 of 2011 -2- has failed to make marks on merit and therefore, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. The aforesaid factual position could not be disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE July 13, 2011 Atul