IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID TUESDAY, THE 18TH OCTOBER 2011 / 26TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 25226 of 2011(C) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. A.A.SHAJI, ATTIYATTIRA HOUSE, S/O.ABDUL KHADER, KANDANTHARA, ALLAPRA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. E.A.NAZAR, PUTHUKKADAN VEEDU, S/O.ABDUL KHADER, KANDANTHARA, ALLAPRA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. ANAS, KAROTHUKUDY HOUSE, S/O.AMMUKUNJU, KANDANTHARA, ALLAPRA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.P.ALI MR.A.MUHAMMED HASHIM RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. SECRETARY (SPECIAL GRADE), GRAMA PANCHAYATH, VENGOLA - 682 554. 2. BEERAN, THELAMPURAM VEEDU, KANDANTHARA, ALLAPRA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 553. 3. ISMAIL, THELAMPURAM VEEDU, KANDANTHARA, ALLAPRA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 553. 4. THE CHIEF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, REGIONAL OFFICE, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, GANDHI NAGAR, KOCHI-682020. ADV. MR.P.THOMAS GEEVERGHESE FOR R2 & 3 MR.C.A.NAVAS FOR R1 MR.M.K.CHANDRAMOHANDAS, SC FOR KSPCB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 25226 of 2011(C) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: REPRESENTATION TO R1 DTD. 19.8.2011. EXT.P2: APPLICATION SUBMITTED UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT DTD. 19.8.2011. EXT.P3: NOTICE OF R1 DTD. 25.8.2011. EXT.P4: INFORMATION DTD. 5.9.2011. EXT.P5: REPRESENTAION TO R4 DTD. 15.9.2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL ... // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No.25226 Of 2011 ---------------------- Dated this the 18th day of October, 2011. J U D G M E N T The writ petition is filed for a direction commanding the 1st respondent not to issue licence to the 2nd respondent to conduct hollow brick unit without obtaining consent letters from the neighbours. 2. When the matter was taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the respondents 2 & 3 submits that they do not intend to operate the Unit and have no idea to operate the Unit without obtaining licence and NOC from the statutory authorities. The learned counsel also submits that the 3rd respondent is a police officer and he is not in any way connected with the hollow brick unit and he has no interest whatsoever in the hollow brick unit. 3. In the light of the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents 2 & 3, the petitioners are not entitled to the reliefs sought for in the writ petition. Without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to move afresh, if circumstances so warrant, the writ petition is closed. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-