HIGH COURT 6F GHHATT$GARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No.949 of 2004 (Writ Petition under Articie 226/22? of the Constitution of india) N Mr.P.R.Patankar, Advocate appears on behaif of MnVijey Deshmukh, counsel for the petitioner. None present for the respondents, aithough sewed. (SB: Hon’b Mr. T.P Shanna, J.) ORDER {ORAL} (17-8-201 1 ) i have perused the order dated 17.1.2004 passed by the Additionai District Judge Khairagarh in Matrimonial Civii Suit No 14AI03 whereby appircation fried on behalf of the petitioner under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 has been dismissed “(\- 2. Without further comment the writ petition is dismissed summarily However exhaustive remedy of appeal is available and the petitioner is at liberty to approach before the appellate Court against the order impugned. No order as to costs. Sd/— Ty Shanna Judge ‘ ‘r a as k f W ivy-W” ie . Petitioner SmtPushp'a Katolkar Wla Shri Non-appiicant Sahadeo Katolkar, Aged about 38 years, R/a Anshu Bhawan In front Shiv Mandir, Shiv Mandir Road, Khairagarh, Dist (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. Sahadeo Katolkar Slo Shri Shyamu: Applicant Katolkar, Aged about 48 years, Lecturer Govemment DIET District Education and Training Centre; Khairagarh, Dist : Rajnandgaon— (C.G.) 2. The AddiDistrict Judge Khairagarh (respondent No2 is a formai party and has been impieaded as the impugned order has been passed by the respondent)