IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWPs No. 8630, 8632, 8643 & 8644 of 2010. Decided on 3rd January, 2011. 1. CWP No.8630 of 2010. Sat Dev Sharma. vs. State of H.P. & ors. 2. CWP No. 8632 of 2010. Devinder Kumar. Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 3. CWP No.8643 of 2010. Ramesh Kumar. Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 4. CWP No.8644 of 2010. Dharam Pal. vs. State of H.P. & ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Y.K. Chandel, Advocate vice Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petitions are filed with the following prayers: “i) That the respondents may be directed to restore the revised/higher pay scale of Rs.1640-2925 as revised to Rs.5480-8925 w.e.f. 1.1.1996 and further revised w.e.f. 1.1.2006 and pay fixation therein as OT/Shastri teacher to the petitioner with all consequential benefits when, this revised pay scale has been restored and released to other similarly situated placed OT/Shastri teacher(s) namely Sh. 2 Mohinder Singh, as per judgment passed by this Hon’ble court in CWP(T) 2903 / 2008 vide Annexure P- 4; affirmed in LPA No.107/2009 dated 30.3.2010 vide Annexure P-5; which also stands implemented on 6.9.2010 vide Annexure P-6 forthwith. (ii) That the action of the respondents in reducing the pay scale of the petitioner from Rs.1640-2925 to Rs.1500-2700 may kindly be quashed and set aside forthwith.” 2. In case the petitioners are similarly situated, as the petitioners covered by LPA No. 107 of 2009 titled as State of H.P. & others vs. Mohinder Singh, a similar treatment, after verification of facts, shall be extended to the petitioners herein also since the State has accepted the judgment and they have implemented the same. The needful in this regard shall be done within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner concerned before the first respondent/competent authority. 3. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 3rd January, 2011, ( Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr/vs) Judge.