IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1048 of 2008 BHASKAR BHUSHAN SHARMA, son of Sri Ram Jatan Prasad Singh, resident of Village Chintamani Chak, P.S. Mokama, Distt. Patna ---Petitioner Versus 1. MR. B.N.PANDEY, the Vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya (Gaya). 2. Dr. Dinesh Kr. Yadav, the Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya (Gaya). 3. Dr. Satyadeo Narayan Sharma, the Chairman of the Governing Body, R.P.S. College, New Baily Road (West), Danapur, Distt. Patna. 4. Mr. Pritanjay Kumar, the Secretary of Governing Body, R.P.S. College, New Bailey Road (West), Danapur, Distt.Patna. 5. Mr Raghuvansh Singh, the Principal, R.P.S.College, New Baily Road (West), Danapur, Distt. Patna. ---Opp. Parties with MJC No.3204 of 2008 AKHILESH SHARMA, son of Haridwar Singh, resident of Village Amwan, P.O. Maharajpur, P.S. Bikram, Distt. Patna. ---Petitioner Versus 1. MR. B.N.PANDEY, the Vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya (Gaya). 2. Dr. Dinesh Kr. Yadav, the Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya (Gaya). 3. Dr. Satyadeo Narayan Sharma, the Chairman of the Governing Body, R.P.S. College, New Baily Road (West), Danapur, Distt. Patna. 4. Mr. Pritanjay Kumar, the Secretary of Governing Body, R.P.S. College, New Bailey Road (West), Danapur, Distt.Patna. 5. Mr Raghuvansh Singh, the Principal, R.P.S.College, New Baily Road (West), Danapur, Distt. Patna. 6. The State of Bihar. ---Opp. Parties ----------- 6. 9.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr Yugal Kishore, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party-University. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the order of this Court, whereby the grievances of the petitioners were to be considered and disposed of, that having not been done and as such the authorities have not complied with the order of this Court. 2 Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party- University submits that on perusal of the order of the Vice-Chancellor, as would be appearing from letter No.L.O. 560/08 dated 27th of May, 2008, as contained in Annexure 4 to M.J.C. No.3204 of 2008, it would appear that the Vice-Chancellor has considered the matter with regard to the grievances of the petitioners for their continuity in service as also for payment of their salary while working in R.P.S. College, New Bailey Road, Patna, which is an affiliated College. Learned counsel further submits that the payment has to be made by the Governing Body of the said affiliated College and not from the fund of the University and the College being an affiliated with the University, appropriate decision was communicated to the Secretary of the said affiliated College and as such it cannot be said that the University has ignored or did not comply with the order of this Court. Having considered the submissions of the parties, I find that in view of the letter as contained in Annexure 4, referred to above, so far as the compliance of the order is concerned on behalf of the University, the same having been complied with and as such these contempt applications need not proceed further. As regards the grievances of the petitioners that they had worked in the R.P.S. College, which is an affiliated College of the opposite party-University, the petitioners propose to represent the grievances before the Governing Body of the said College as also with the concerned department of the State Government for redressal of their grievances. If such a representation is filed, the grievances of the 3 petitioners shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. In view of the above, these contempt applications need not proceed further. The same are, accordingly, disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)