BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Ninth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. TAMILVANAN CRL OP(MD) No.15977 of 2011 RENUKA ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PUDUKOTTAI TOWN POLICE STATION, PUDUKOTTAI, CRIME NO. 460/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.VINAYAK Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/A2 as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 2.The petitioner/A2 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 406 and 506(i) I.P.C. in Crime No.460 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police, has come forward with the application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking anticipatory bail. 3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it is a civil transaction the petitioner, co-accused and the defacto complainant. Admittedly, no injury was sustained by the defacto complainant and there is no bad antecedents against the petitioner. 4.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that as per the complaint given by the defacto complaint, the petitioner/A2 had received jewels worth about Rs.2,00,000/- from the defacto complainant to establish her business along with A1. However the jewels were not returned. When the defacto complainant demanded the jewels, the petitioner/A2 threatened the defacto complainant orally. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is no bad antecedents agaisnt the petitioner and no injury was sustained by the defacto complainant, I find it just and reasonable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner on the following conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ thee vent of her arrest, on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pudukkottai and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed. sd/- 09/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ,PUDKKOTTAI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PUDUKOTTAI TOWN POLICE STATION, PUDUKOTTAI +1. CC to M/S. S.VINAYAK Advocate SR.No.42993 rl/6c – 9.12.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15977 of 2011 Date :09/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/