IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 17797 of 2007 Between: P.Maheswara Rao S/o.Ramulu R/o.Malkapuram, 33/11 K.V.Sub Station AP Eastern Power Distribution Company Ltd.,Visakhapatnam ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Eastern Power Distribution Company of AP Ltd., rep.by its Chairman & Managing Director Near Gurudwar Junction, Seethampet, Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam District-530020 2 The Director (Finance and HRD), Easter Power Distribution Company of AP Ltd., Near Gurudwar Junction, Seethampet, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District-530020 3 The Chief General Manager (Expenditure)-cum-Enquiry Officer, Eastern power Distribution Company of AP Ltd., Near Gurudwar Junction, Seethampet, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District-530020 4 The Superintending Engineer (Operation) Easter Power Distribution Company of AP Ltd., Opp:Green Park Hotel Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District-5300020 5 The Divisional Electrical Engineer (Operation circle) Division II, Ramamurthy Pantulupeta, Kancharapalem Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. ..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.PEETA RAMAN Counsel for the Respondents: --- The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “Therefore for the reasons stated in the above paras, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an order direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring all the proceeding leading up to an including the proceedings under Memo No. HRD/DC/PO-II /F.No.59/01/ D.No.278/07 dated 30.5.2007 of the 1st respondent as arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction and also violative of the principles of natural justice and unfair labour practice besides violative of Arts.14,19 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to extent all the benefits that are with held and denied i.e. re- fixation of original pay scale release of increments including pay fixation with all other incidental and consequential benefits as per rules from the date of suspension.” The learned counsel for the petitioner circulated letter dated 30-04-2009 to the Registry, wherein he stated that he was instructed by the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, interim order dated 23-08-2007 is vacated and WPMP No.22811 of 2007 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 1st May, 20091 vrn