N HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. M.C.C.No. 720 of 2011 Appellant Respondents Respondent Ramcharan Ogre, s/o Rambilas Ogre, aged about 35 years, r/o Village Basin, P.S. Rajim, District Raipur (C.G). VERSUS 1 Smt. Pushpa Bai w/o late Keshavram Sahu, aged about 33 years. 2 Ku. Motin Sahu, s/o late Keshavram Sahu, aged about 15 years. 3 Onkar Prasad Sahu s/o late Keshavram Sahu, aged about 14 years. 4. Ku. Kusumlata Sahu d/o late Keshavram Sahu, aged about 12 years. 5. Ku. Kiran Sahu d/o late Keshavram Sahu, aged about 10 years. No.2 to 5 through their legal mother Smt. Pushpa Bai (Resp.No.1) 6. Smt. Revti Bai w/o late Sadhuram Sahu aged about 58 years All residents of village Binouri, P.S. Rajim, district Raipur C.G. 7. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Pandari, Raipur C.G. ApDlication for restoration of M.A.C.No.653/2006. M.C.C.No.720 of 2011 Present: Shri Dharmesh Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner. ORDER (19th October, 2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri Dharmesh Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2) On due consideration, I.A.No.01/2011 is allowed and the delay in filing the restoration petition is hereby condoned. 3) Shri Dharmesh Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner is heard on the restoration petition. 4) The petitioner is seeking restoration of M.A.C. No.653 of 2006, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 22.06.2011. 5) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, we are satisfied that the absence of the petitioner's/appellant's counsel on 22.06.2011, when M.A.C. No.653 of 2006 was taken-up for hearing, was based on bona fide grounds. 6) M.C.C. No. 720 of 2011, therefore, is allowed and M.A.C. No.653 of 2006 is restored to its original number. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge subbu