IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 26TH JUNE 2009 / 5TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 17412 of 2009(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- MOHANAN.K.V.,AGED 39 YEARS, DIAMOND WORKER,KAITHAKKAL HOUSE, SOUTH KONDAZHI P.O.,THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, S.P.OFFICE,THRISSUR-3. 2. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAZHAYANNOOR POLICE STATION, PAZHAYANNOOR,THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. RAMANKUTTY,SOUTH KONDZHI P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. SANDHEEP,S/O.RAMANKUTTY, SOUTH KONDZHI P.O.,THRISSUR DISTRICT. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.A. SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) NO. 17412 OF 2009. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 2009. J U D G M E N T Raman, J. Petitioner filed Ext. P1 complaint before the first respondent alleging misconduct on the part of the second respondent in the matter of a complaint made by the petitioner against Respondents 3 and 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that though Ext.P1 was filed as early as on 13.4.2009, first respondent has not disposed of the same after due enquiry. 2. In the view we are taking, it is not necessary to issue notice to Respondents 2 to 4. The limited relief that can be granted to the petitioner is to direct the first respondent, in the factual situation, to enquire into Ext.P1 after due notice to all interested parties and thereafter dispose of the same in accordance with law. An opportunity of being heard shall be given to the petitioner also. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with WP(C) 17412/2009 :2: a copy of the writ petition before the 4th respondent for information and compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE. KNC/-