IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 911 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 03/07/2009 in WP NO : 13260 OF 2009 on the file of the High Court.) Between: C.Parimala D/o. C Subbarayudu Andhra Pradesh Social Welfare Residential(RPRP) School APSWR(RPRP) School Quarters,Madakalavari Palli Badvel,Kadapa District ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The Andhra Pradesh Social Welfare Residential Education Institutions Society, rep.by its Secretary Masab Tank,Hyderaad 2 The Andhra Pradesh Social Welfare Residential Education Institutions Society, rep.by its Joint Secretary Zone IV Kadapa, Kadapa District. 3 The Principal Andhra Pradesh Social Welfare Residential, Madakalavari Palli Badvel,Kadapa District 4 Smt. N.Padmavathi W/o. not known to the petitioner Andhra Pradesh Social Welfare Residential (RPRP) School Madakalavari Palli, Gopavaram Mandal, Badvel, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.V.R.REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following : HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.A. No.911 OF 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari). The appeal is preferred by the appellant against the order of the learned single Judge passed in W.P.No:13260 of 2009 on 3.7.2009. The appellant is the writ petitioner. She filed the writ petition seeking a direction to declare the proceedings dated 20.4.2009 issued by the 3rd respondent and the consequential proceedings in Rc.No:A1/243/2008, dated 30.6.2009 issued by the 2nd respondent as illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the same. The learned single Judge having observed that the order passed by the 2nd respondent cannot be said to be illegal and arbitrary on any ground, disposed of the writ petition with a direction to respondents-1 and 2 to consider the request of the petitioner sympathetically so as to accommodate her in the school campus. Having aggrieved by the same, the present writ appeal is preferred by the writ petitioner. Heard and perused the entire material available on record. A perusal of the material available on record, makes it clear that while making the allotment, the 2nd respondent has taken into consideration the fact that the present of the teachers who are teaching 10th class students is essential in the quarters located in the premises of the school. At this stage, the fact that remains undisputed is that the writ petitioner is teaching the students of 5th to 7th classes as on today. Apart from that, it can be also be observed that during the course of allotment of quarters, the authorities have followed the procedure as prescribed under the Standing Order No:13 of 1995, dated 31.10.1995. In this background of the matter, We feel that the action of the authorities cannot be said to be arbitrary and illegal and hence, the order of the learned single Judge does not warrant any interference by this Court. Therefore, the appeal is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. However, time is extended till 27.7.2009 to vacate the quarter. _____________________________ Justice T. MEENA KUMARI ____________________________ Justice SANJAY KUMAR Dated 9th July, 2009. Dvs/Gurc HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.A. No.911 OF 2009 (Judgment of the Division Bench delivered by Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) Dated 9th July, 2009.