IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2011/30TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WPC.No. 34467 of 2011 (G) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SUBAIDA.S, D/O.SAID MUHAMMED, AGED 58 YEARS, PADATHANATTU HOUSE, HOUSE NO.XI/225-C, PADAMUGHAL, THRIKKAKKARA, VAZHAKKALA, KAKKANAD P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE SRI.T.A.ABDUL RASHEED SMT.RENJINI RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REP BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FOREST, GOVERNMEMNT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 001 2. THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, DEPT OF FORESTS, GOVT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 001 3. THE ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL CHIEF FOREST CONSERVATOR VIGILANCE, DEPT OF FORESTS, GOVT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 014 4. DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, FLYING SQUAD DIVISION, VANASREE,MATHOTTAM, KOZHIKODE -28 5. T.E. SHAMSUDHIN, S/O.LATE C.M. IBRAHIM, CHIRAKKAKUDIYIL HOUSE, KAVUMKARA, MARKET P.O, MUVATTUPUZHA. BY SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY, SPL. GOVT. PLEADER FOR FOREST DEPARTMENT BY STATE ATTORNEY SRI.VIJAYRAGHAVAN BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SHYSON P.MANKUZHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-12-2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.34467/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF OP.NO. 716/2003 FILED BEFORE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM. EXT.P2 A TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF STATEMENT OF OBJECTIONS PRODUCED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT IN OP.716/2003. EXT.P3 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF REPRESENTATION TO THE SECOND AND 4TH RESPONDENTS. EXT.P4 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 3 EXT.P5 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF INFORMATION ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE UNDER SECRETARY. EXT.P6 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF COMMUNICATION DT.8.6.2011 HAS ISSUED NOTICE TO THE PETITIONER SUPPLYING THE INFORMATION. EXT.P7 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE DETAILED REPRESENTATION TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT, EXT.P8 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF THE CHILD OF RAIHANATH INDICATING SHAMSUDHIN AS THE FATHER DT.21.8.2007. EXT.P9 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD SIGNED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.34467 of 2011. = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 21st December, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the fifth respondent. The fifth respondent is having a child in another lady. According to the petitioner, he has married her also. 2. The petitioner is a retired Sales Tax Officer and the fifth respondent is a retired Forest Ranger. A complaint was submitted by the petitioner regarding the conduct of the fifth respondent to respondents 1, 2 and 4. However, according to her, no action was taken on her complaint. Without any notice to the petitioner, Exts.P4 and P5 orders were passed finding that her complaint was without any basis. The said orders were communicated to her only through Ext.P6. Aggrieved by Ext.P6 the petitioner has submitted Ext.P7 review petition. She WP(C).No.34467/2011. 2 complains that no action has been taken on Ext.P7 so far. According to the petitioner, the third respondent is the authority who has to consider and pass orders on Ext.P7. Therefore, the counsel for the petitioner seeks the issue of appropriate directions for the consideration of Ext.P7. 3. I have heard the learned State Attorney who appears for the respondents. 4. In view of the limited relief that is claimed, I am of opinion that this writ petition can be disposed of directing the third respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P7. 5. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the third respondent to consider the review petition submitted by the petitioner, evidenced herein by Ext.P7, in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner WP(C).No.34467/2011. 3 also. The petitioner shall be at liberty to produce any additional document that she may desire to produce. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, (Judge) Kvs/-