IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.O.P.C. No. 81 of 2010. Decided on: 28.06.2010. Kalyan Singh and others. …Petitioners. -Versus- Harinder Hira and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General. Mr. R.S. Gupta, respondent No. 3 present in person. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The operative portion of the judgment dated 04.08.2009, rendered by this Court in Kalyan Singh and others. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, C.W.P No. 1751 of 2008 reads thus: “According, in view of the orders passed by the competent authorities vide Annexure PA and Annexure PB, respondents No. 1 to 5 are directed to evict the private respondents from the encroached land within a period of two weeks from today. The Sub Divisional Officer (Civil), Tehsil Shahpur, District Kangra is directed to file personal affidavit of compliance. The respondents No. 1 to 5 are also 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. directed to ensure expeditious disposal of the case pertaining to further encroachment made by respondents No. 7 & 8 on Khasra No. 1491/946. These proceedings be decided within a period of three months from today. With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.” 2. The case of the petitioners, in a nut-shell, is that despite the judgment dated 4th August, 2009, neither the respondents have been evicted nor further proceedings initiated against the encroachers in Khasra No. 1491/946 have been concluded. 3. In sequel to notice issued by this Court, Mr. R.S. Gupta, respondent No. 3 is present in the Court. He submits that the judgment in question has been implemented in letter and spirit by evicting the encroachers from the suit land. He also submits that the proceedings qua Khasra No. 1491/946 had also been concluded. He also informs the Court that Civil Suit preferred by the private parties in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kangra at Dharamshala bearing No. 104 of 2009, also stands dismissed. 4. In view of these submissions, no order is required to be passed further, except that the respondents shall take effective steps for eviction of the encroachers from Khasra No. 1491/946 within a period of four weeks from today. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge June 28, 2010. (bhupender)