IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2548 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 2548 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 2548 OF 2006 Mukesh Laxmilal Kothari ... Petitioner V/s. The Maharashtra Housing and Area... Respondent Development authority AND WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2549 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 2549 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 2549 OF 2006 Mr. Laxmilal Ghanshiramji Kothari .. Petitioner V/s. The Maharashtra Housing And Area ... Respondent Development Authority Mr. Harish Pawar for petitioner. Mr. K.R. Belossey AGP for respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 6th October, 2006 : 6th October, 2006 : 6th October, 2006 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner points out that the issue involved in this petition is similar to what was in issue in Writ Petition (L) No. 742 of 2006. The grievance of the petitioner is that NOC issued for change of user from residential to commercial has been cancelled without giving hearing to the petitioner. ( 2 ) 3. Considering the above on behalf of respondent No. 1, learned Counsel submits that Chief Officer of MHADA will give hearing to the petitioner. 4. The Chief Officer of MHADA is directed to hear the petitioner. The entire exercise to be completed within eight weeks from today. 5. In the above circumstances, the Rule made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]