1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Appli. No.266/2008 (Om Prakash vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 04, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Trilok Joshi, for the petitioner. Mr.J.P.S.Choudhary, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that earlier the case diary was called by order dt. 21.1.2008 and it was received, however, the matter was not argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the matter was adjourned. From perusal of the order impugned, it appears that contraband opium punishable under the N.D.P.S. Act has been recovered from co-accused Atma Ram and it was Atma Ram, who is said to have purchased the opium from the present petitioner. There is allegation against the present petitioner for the offence under section 8/18 read with section 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. In such matters, a custodial interrogation is necessary and, therefore, it is not at all a fit case to grant 2 anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The bail application filed by the petitioner under section 438 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-