HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.7677 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner herein is A-3 in Crime No.13 of 2009 on the file of III town P.S., Eluru, West Godavari District, registered for the offences under Sections 467, 468, 471, 474 and 420 and read with Section 34 IPC. 2. The petitioner is accused of fabricating the Provident Fund contributions and thereafter, withdrawing the amounts from the P.F. account standing in the name of D.V.R.S.N. Murthy. It appears that D.V.R.S.N. Murthy never worked as a Government Teacher. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the respondent-State. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. 5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the petition on the ground that the investigation is pending and if the petitioner is admitted to bail, there is every possibility of interference in the further investigation. 6. I have gone through the report presented by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, West Godavari District. The relevant portion of the report reads as hereunder: “Sri D.V.R.S.N. Murthy was called to Tahsildar’s office of Akiveedu on 04-11-2008 and he was enquired. He orally stated that the entire issue was planned by Sri K. Chandrasekhar. He is not aware of the cheating until the enquiry came. But he refused to give written and signed statement of the matter. Hence, it is requested to file criminal case against Sri K. Chandrasekhara Rao and Smt. K. Uma Devi, who is under suspension for forgery, fabrication of records, cheating and illegal misappropriation of money from Z.P. Provident Fund and a criminal case may also be filed against Sri D.V.R.S.N. Murthy who is residing at Akiveedu for cheating and illegal misappropriation of money from Z.P. Provident Fund account.” 7. In view of the specific accusation leveled against the petitioner, and the pendency of the investigation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. ____________________ September 25, 2009 KVR