HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU C.M.A. No.477 of 2010 JUDGMENT: At the request of both the counsel, the main appeal itself is taken up for disposal. 2. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 30.12.2009 in A.S. No.56 of 2008 on the file of the VI Additional District Judge, Medak at Siddipet in setting aside the judgment and decree dated 11.4.2008 in O.S. No.53 of 2004 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Siddipet. 3. The facts in brief are that the appellant is the plaintiff and the respondent is the defendant in the Suit. The appellant-plaintiff filed the suit in O.S. No. 53 of 2004 before the learned Senior Civil Judge, Siddipet seeking recovery of a sum of Rs. 2.00 lakhs from the respondent-defendant. The said Suit was decreed in favour of the appellant. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree of the trial Court in O.S. No.53 of 2004, the respondent carried the matter in appeal before the lower appellate Court. By the impugned order, the lower appellate Court on re-appreciation of the evidence, has allowed the appeal and remanded the matter to the trial Court for fresh disposal. Hence, the appellant filed the present civil miscellaneous appeal. 4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the impugned judgment, this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the well considered judgment of the lower appellate Court. There is a serious dispute with regard to execution of promissory note. Several criminal and civil disputes are pending between the families of plaintiff and defendant. When the lower Court denied the plea of sending promissory note to an expert, it could at least compare the signature of defendant in promissory note with that of the admitted signatures of defendant available in the suit record. To do substantial justice to both parties, the case is remanded to trial Court. 5. However, at this stage, both the counsel requested that a direction may be given to the trial Court to dispose of the Suit expeditiously. 6. In view of the fact that the Suit is of the year 2004, the trial Court is directed to dispose of the main Suit in O.S. No.53 of 2004, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. The Civil Miscellaneous appeal is accordingly dismissed confirming the judgment of the lower appellate Court. No costs. ____________ K.C. BHANU,J DATE: 28th March, 2011 pnb