IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7478 of 2007 Ashok Kumar Mehta, son of Jhuber Lal Mehta, resident of Village-Haripur, P.S. Forbesganj, P.O. Haripur, District-Araria ---- Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The District Collector, Araria 3. The Addl. Collector, Araria 4. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Forbesganj, Araria 5. The Circle Officer (Anchal Adhikari, Forbesganj, Araria 6. Brahmdeo Mahta, son of Late Mahabir Mehta 7. Binod Kumar Mehta, son of Late Gopal Mehta 8. Birendra Kumar Mehta, son of late Gopal Mehta, respondent nos. 6 to 8 are resident of Village Haripur, P.S. Forbesganj, District- Araria. --- Respondents. ------- 2. 6.2.2009 Heard Ram Kumar Sharma for the petitioner, and learned Assistant Counsel to Standing Counsel No.14. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 28.3.2007 (Annexure-1), passed by the learned Additional Collector, Araria in Case No.144/05-06 (Brahmdev Mehta Vrs. Ashok Kumar Mehta). Learned counsel for the petitioner raises a grievance before this Court that the following portion of the order is inherently contradictory and can not stand side by side. “ vr% mijksDr rdksZa ,oa lk{;ksa ds vk/kkj ij fuEu U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr =qfViw.kZ vkns”k dks fujLr djrs gq, bl cVkbZnkjh vihy okn dks vLohÑr fd;k tkrk gS ,oa vkns”k fn;k tkrk gS fd fuEu U;k;ky; dk vfHkys[k ,oa bl vkns”k dh Nk;k izfr layXu dj vko”;d dkjZokbZ gsrq foK Hkwfe lq/kkj milekgRrkZ] Qkjfclxat dks HkstsaA bl vkns”k ds lkFk bl okn dh dk;Zokgh lekIr fd;k tkrk gSA” In other words, the learned appellate authority has 2 set aside the order of the learned first authority, and has also rejected the appeal. It appears to me that the expression „vLohÑr‟ is a typographical error for the expression „LohÑr‟. The impugned order is accordingly clarified to mean that the appeal was allowed, and the order of the learned first authority is set aside. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar , J.)