IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.14681 of 2010 MD.KALLU @ MD.IRSHAD @ BADRE ALAM S/o Md. Tahir @ Budhan Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 12.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 395, 397 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel submits that petitioner is not named in the First Information Report. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession. The petitioner is in custody since 09.11.2009. Learned counsel for State submits that on the basis of confessional statement of petitioner, mobile has been recovered. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after two months. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)