IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.14632-M of 2009 Date of Decision:16.2.2011 Sachin Sharma .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. A.P.S. Deol, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Rattan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. Sanjay Tangri, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has since expired and the present petition is rendered infructuous. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 16.2.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE