m' K^- INTHEHIGHCQURTOPJI^ICATUREeHH^FTISqA^ BiyispUR CIVILREVIS^^ Atmlicant (DeIe&daatNo.I) ^2©04 SmtPulmati W/o Matfaijira D/foAmir Sai, Aged about 55 year^ R^o Poperenga^ Tahsit ^Kapur, Dist Syrguja-(C.G.) ! ^ ^ ^"' ^. Non-ADDlicants Versus :1. f^ ^ jy ^ ^- Fikrp Bai W/o Chetan Ram, D/o %miT Sai, Aged about 51 years, Occ^aj^on^^^^ ^ Village Bai^idih, Tahsil : Sitapur, Dist : Surguja-(C.©.) —-PtaintiffNo.I— 1^^ BimimBmW/oC^i^^ Amir Sai, ^ed aboiil ^I years, Qccupatioa, Cultiayation ^/o Village R)ksari, 1^hsiI--Sitapur^ Dist: Siirguja- (C.G.) —PIaintifFNo.2— Smt-Stkhni W/o Sonsai D/o Amir Sai, ^^d about not^^^^^^^^te Cultivation R/o Nawapara (Rakeli), TahsiIAmbikapur,Dist:Sui^uja-(e.G.) —-DefendajitNo.2— State of Chhattisgarfa Through CQllectorSurgiya-fC.G.l —DefendnatNo^— ':^ CML REVISION U/S 115 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEI ^$y s^^y^ m':''"^^^i^ XI-HC-22 i^:^ 3fl^?T'5FT 'f^TNNi^T 5ti^icr» <ii^a N' ,^, 1-. ^ ^. <° ^;^l?Rjn^||?^Ti]to y': Wflcm^fflc^ 31T^?T 'q^lg :M:.^:.^:. "^ 2<X^ •IN^T" 28.10.2004:- Shri Arun Shiikla, counsej foif the appliGant. H6ard. Siliit The applicarrt filed Civil decreed on 01,10.2001. ; The nori- under Order 9 Rule 13 of the C.FI. judgement and idecree. The trial 19.09.2003. r Being aggrieve^ appljcants/defeiafilants filed an Additional District | Judge, Ambi|<apur correctness of the same this petitioil app^al Thls Learned counsel for the impugned prder to this Court, interfere with the order of the app^llate isdjsmissed. cbl^lf<rl<lflr1 ^W^'^l^t <fa^i< '^3tf^PT3n^T No. 4-A/2Q01 and the same was applicants/ defendants filed a petition C. pra>flng the Court to set aside the sourt dismissed the said application on by the said orcter the non- and the same was altowed by the .(Sarguja). |Qyestioning the hasbeenfited; p^titiooer read o»ut and translated the Court does not firtd any reason to Court. Consequently, the revision Sd/- f Chief Justice 1 [T:ft^^Ri^