IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 8479 of 2008. Decided on: 07.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Subhash Chand. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Yash W. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that similarly situate persons have been granted seniority by giving relaxation of one year. However, it has come in the reply filed by the respondents that no such benefit has been given to the persons mentioned in the petition. No rejoinder has been filed to the averments contained in para 3 of the reply. Consequently, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 07, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.