IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2011 / 31ST ASHADHA 1933 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 588 of 2002() ----------------------------- CRA.229/1999 of III ADDL. SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC) FAST TRACK COURT NO.I, THRISSUR CC.136/1997 of CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, THRISSUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED :- ---------------------------------------------------------------- K.P. DASAPPAN, KOLLARA HOUSE, THIRUMALABHAGAM, CHERTHALA, ALLEPPEY DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT/STATE :- --------------------------------------------------------- 1. E.S.I. CORPORATION, REP. LBY ESI INSPECTOR, THRISSUR. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.PUZHAKKARA MOHAMMED ADV.SRI.T.P.M. IBRAHIM KHAN FOR R1 THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: jvt P. S. GOPINATHAN, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Crl.R.P. No.588 of 2002 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 22nd day of July 2011 O R D E R It is reported by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner that the revision petitioner is no more. No legal heir is coming forward to get impleaded and to prosecute the appeal. Submission is recorded. The revision petition is dismissed as abated. 2. The trial court shall issue arrest warrant and ascertain the factum of death. In the event it is revealed that the submission made by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner is not true, the sentence shall be executed forthwith and compliance shall be reported. Even otherwise, steps for realization of the fine shall be initiated. P. S. GOPINATHAN, JUDGE. Jvt