IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31079 of 2008 UPENDRA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.10.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Police case under Sections 395 of the Penal Code. It is submitted that the F.I.R. is against unknown. The allegations are of decamped with a hired car after dumping the driver. The vehicle in question has been recovered from co-accused, who has then named the petitioner. Co-accused naming the petitioner has been enlarged on regular bail. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail shall be considered on its own merits including grant of regular bail to co-accused who has named the petitioner without being prejudiced by the present order. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)