Singie Bench : Hon’bie Shri H.L. Daitu, cJ. Writ Ee’tition &o. 324 of 19$. Mohan Bharati, S/o Shri Rajdeo Bhamti aged about 45 yea!s Businessman r/0 QNo. 1—B, Street No.12, Sector 4, Bhltai Nagar, Tah. And Distt. Durg (M.P.) Petitioner Respondents 1. Special Area Develcpment Authority Bhilai Durg through : Chairman, SADA, Supela, Bhiiai- Nagar, Tah. & Dish: Durg (MR) 2. Chief Executive omcer Special Area Development Authority Bhilal Durg, omce — Supela, Bhilai, Tah & Dlstt. Durg (M.P.) Through : Managing Director, Bhllai Steel Plant, Bhilal Nagar, Tah and Distt. Burg (M.P.) 3. Steel Authority of India Ltd. State of Madhya Pradesh Through : Secretary, Town & Country Planning Department, Bhopal (MR) Estate Officer, (Under Public Premises eviction of un-authorised Occupants) Act 1971) T.A. Building Civic Centre, Bhilai Nagar, Tah. And Distt. Durg (MR) 6. Shri A.N. Kuttappan Nair, Nair Hotel, Adarsh Nagar, Durg (M.P.) nature Petition of under Certiorari, Articles Mandamus 2261227 of Prohibition the Constitution etc. ang of for india futther for Writs aggrggriatg in the directione. Present: Shn' v.G. Tamaskar, counsel for tiie petitioner. Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, GA for respondent No.4/State. ORAL ORPEg (Passed on 3 April, 2007) The petitioner claims that he is a citizen of lndla ard resident of Bhilai- Nagar, Distt. Durg. ' (2) The mst respondem is a Loom-Authority constituted under the provisions of Section 64 cf the MP. Naga fited under Articles 226 and 227 of the (3) In this petition r, Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam; 1973. Constitution of lndia, grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents have not regularized the aliotment of Shop No. 42, Camp 1, Bhiiai Nagar. Therefore, he is before this Court in this writ petition inter alia seeking certain directions to the respondents n, the petition tiled by the petitioner is premature. said relief‘ the petitioner ought to ropriate representation before the respondents requesting p No. 42 at Bhilai Nagar as has been done in the case of others. Without doing so, he would not have approached this ew of the matter, without going lhto the other details oi the ln my opinio (4) Before approaching this Court for the afore have tiled an app them to regularize the plot/she Court. ln that vi of with a direction to the petitioner to make case, the petition is disposed No.3 within 15 days time from appropriate representation before respondent today for appropriate relief. (5) Third respondentSteel Authority of India, Ltd is directed to consider the representation, if the same is tiled by the th from the date of tiling of the All the contentions of the parties are lett \4; ' petitioner within the usly as time granted by the Court, in accordance with iaw as expeditio possible, at any rate, within a representation by the petitioner. open. Ordered accordingly. m0“