1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 112 OF 2003 Venkanna s/o Govindu Gandamwar and others ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents ..... Mr. M.V. Deshpande, advocate for the petitioners Mr. D.R. Korde, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2 Mr. P.V. Mandlik, senior counsel for respondent No.3. ..... CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 8TH SEPTEMBER, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 Heard counsel for the respective parties. 2 This Revision Application is filed challenging the judgment and order dated 16.8.2002 passed below Exh.47 and 11.10.2002 passed below Exh.48 both in Regular Darkhast No. 27 of 1999, by learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Nanded. It is an undisputed position that the applications were filed before the trial court with a prayer to grant limited protection till the first appeal No. 221 of 1999 and other 2 connected appeals are finally decided by this court. It is also not in dispute that the said first appeals are disposed of by this Court. 3 In the circumstances, counsel for the respective parties jointly submit that the operation of the orders dated 16.8.2002 and 11.10.2002 passed below Exh 47 and 48 respectively, in Regular Darkhast No. 27 of 1999, has come to an end. In this view of the matter, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present Revision Application and the Revision Application is thus disposed of. Rule discharged. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) rlj/