1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 249/2011 in COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 11/2011 in COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 49/2008 in COMPANY PETITION NO. 11/1996 (In the matter of M/s. Niranjan Ayurwed Bhawan Ltd vrs. Vinodkumar M. Hisaria and two others) ................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................... Mrs. M.B.Hardas, counsel for Official Liquidator. ... CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 11th FEBRUARY, 2011. This court had issued bailable warrant to secure the presence of the accused no. 3 – Shri Vinaykuar M. Hisaria, on the address mentioned in the cause title of the application. It was received back, as he was not found on the said address, which was from the District of Bhandara. The application was moved for furnishing the fresh address of the accused no. 3 and for 2 issuance of bailable warrant on the said address. The address furnished was of Hingna, Distt. Nagpur. Accordingly, by an order dated 7th January, 2011, this court had issued bailable warrant to the accused no. 3 on the same terms and conditions as were imposed in the earlier order dated 27.10.2010. The Office Note shows that the report of the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur city, Nagpur, showing that the warrant has returned back unserved for want of correct address. Hence, this application has been moved seeking direction for issuance of proclamation in the manners specified in Para 5 (I) to (IV). After going through the contents of the application, I am satisfied that the case is made out for issuance of proclamation. Hence, issue proclamation in the manners specified under Section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code through the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, by various modes as are given in para 5 (I) to (IV). So far as proclamation as specified in para 5(IV) is concerned, it should be published in “Hitvada” 3 English Edition and the Lokmat, Marathi Edition, having wide circulation in the District of Nagpur and Bhandara, to secure the presence of the accused no. 3 on 25.3.2011, on the terms and conditions specified in the order dated 27.10.2010, passed by this Court. Application stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Rvjalit