IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37961 of 2010 RAVINDRA YADAV S/O BAIJ NATH YADAV……….PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 18.11.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Abuse in name of caste is also there. Petitioner along with one named and three unnamed is alleged for committing rape upon the complainant/informant that is doubted on the ground that it was 10.00P.M. While the informant was sleeping with her children and her husband had gone to meet the call of nature. All the five accused persons raped upon informant one after another is said improbable, if time taken by the husband is considered and no much action of children and their age has also not been given. Further in course of investigation, allegation of rape is changed and minimized to attempt to rape and resolving of the differences in between the parties. Abuse in name of caste is said inside the house not in public view. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with G.R. No.337/2010 arising out of Madhepura P. S. Case No.86/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.) 2