1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Misc. Civil Application No.881 of 2011 (for Review) In Writ Petition No.5182 of 2010 (D) (Smt. Shevantabai Eknath Kamble v. Dy. Conservator of Forest, Forest Department, Bhandara, and another) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri R.S. Bhure, Advocate for Applicant. Shri S.S. Deshpande, Advocate for Respondents. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 22 nd November, 2011 By this review application, the applicant, who is the original respondent in Writ Petition No.5182 of 2010 decided on 14-6-2011, seeks review. The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that this Court has referred to the judgment and order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.2517 of 2010 decided on 30-7-2010. In the said judgment and order, the costs of Rs.10,000/- were imposed and the employee was directed to be reinstated in her former post without prejudice to the contentions of the employer. He, therefore, submits that the same course of action should have been adopted by this Court while deciding the writ petition. 2 Undisputedly, the matter was listed for final hearing. None was present for the respondent, the applicant herein. This Court has taken into consideration the judgment and order passed by this Court on 30-7-2010 delivered in Writ Petition No.2517 of 2010. Hence, no ground for review is made out. The learned counsel for the respondents, however, makes a statement that the applicant shall be provided work as a daily wager as and when it becomes available, during the pendency of the complaint, which is directed to be decided on remand of the matter by this Court. In view of above, the Misc. Civil Application is dismissed. Judge pdl