^H^T^FT f^ri^^n^r 5t)4-iict) ^fia T ^ •^St ^Mld<4. ^y4!^, ^wy sv^ 'q^ra? ^l+1€r(l ^^j^***—*********'****^*'****'*"**'^^ 200 '^^ST' W^T ^"CT^R: ^rf^T H2GH cuURTuF CtjHAT-TisuARH;AT_Bl^L^yUR WPJT PETITI&N (Cj WQ. 2764/2008 PKTTTIONBR Ritesh aged ab^ Mai'g, !vl|i Versus itumar Gupta, S/o Shri Ramesh Gupta, >ut 25 years, R/o Ward No.14, Sarowar laiienclragaili, Distt. Korea (CG) KESFONDENTS 1. Regiona} Raipur 2. Secretail Ch1^atti< 'WRIT PETTTION UNDE.R ARTICiL OR4.L O R D ER SB: DHIREND&A MISHRA,J peUt]|oner Mr. Maiioj Chouhaii, cou^ Mr. V.V.S. Mm'hty, Dy, A(j i-iearcl, Grievance of the applicatiou of Annexure P-1 bl Stage Carriage Permit on tli( KeUiari, Jaiiakpur. The appMcatiit Uctober ^UUY, However, eveu ^ order has been passed on his dii'ection may be issued to the ii tlie application of tlie petitioner,| Mr. Murtliy, leamed Dy, State siibinits tliat now suice tbe <=hl^fd4lrl 'RTH^Tf ^ 'fexst <f^^i< i7'3^THCT^T Traiisport Aiitliority, Chhattisgarh at Regional Traiisport Autliority, cycii"1"» at F^ilcKa^nr ^l^-l-*.-«-*. ^.<-«>. ^-/A^.^.^.^j^l.-B.^ E 226 OFTHE CONSTiTuTION OF-iNDIA '7-6-2008 isel tor Uie petitioiier, .vocate General for Uie State. is tiiat iie iias suDmittecl aii ;fore the respondent No.l for graiit of route MaiiendraLgarh to Kotadol-via- was heard on his appilcation on 25th i|fter a lapse of more tliaa 7 montlis, 110 ^pUcation aiid iii these cn'cumstaiices, a ^spondents to pass appropriate order cn ^dvocate General appearmg 011 behalf of :.be office of the Commissioner has been _--fV— T ~3^[ ^NM^, ^Tll^^l^ ^<ni^ll< ^ITt^T ^S^K 37T^T'^T [<rii<=h 3=n^r 5t>^ict) ^f^a ^W^{ ^^^—————^^ 200 'f^ST' ^TT^T'^rra^ Trf^r -z- constituted aiicl Coinmissioner application for Stage Caniage fl <=tT<Ll(<n<flT1 TTFI^ff ^ 'feTSt iPsl^K ^T ^Tf^FT ^3TT^^ happens to be the Chairmaii ofUie Road TTaiisport AuUiority aiid theref^re, tliere shall be 110 delay ui disposal of termit heucefoi-tii, )etiti LeaiTied coiinsel for Uie ^etitioner submits that this petition inay be dxsposed of witli a directi^ appiicat-ion ot me petitioner wit| Leaiiied coiuisel for the ii to me respoudents to dispose of tlie hta specified period. State has 110 objection if fhe petition is disposed ofwitli Uie aforesaicl ^n^ction. In view of tlie submissi<| uistaiit petition is disposecl ol hear the petitiouer 011 his appl| preferabiy witliui a period| receipt/production ofcopy oftl| ^ns made. by the respective. paities, tlie witli a directiou to tlie respondents to l^ation aud decide the same expeditiously of 2 iiionths from the date of [as orcier. SdJ- Dhirendra Mishra Judge [Tft^ ^Rsi^