IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.16793 of 2008 Between: 1 G.Raman, S/o. Venkatesu, 2 Bojja Chandrasekhar, S/o. Bojja Reddy, 3 Kondi Chetty Muniramaiah, S/o. K.Muthayallaiah, 4 T.Ramamoorthy, S/o. T.Chakraiah, 5 Y.Dooraswamy Naidu, S/o. Nagaiah Naidu, 6 K.Harinath, S/o. K.Rangaiah, 7 P.Reddappa Reddy, S/o. Pedda Reddappa Reddy, 8 P.Subramanyam Reddy, S/o. P.Dorasamireddy, 9 D.Mohan Ram, S/o. D.Krishna Swamy, 10 K.Yugandhar Reddy, S/o. Venkata Krishna Reddy, 11 P.Chandra Reddy, S/o. P.Venkat Reddy, 12 V. Ramaiah S/o. V. Munaiah 13 M. Jyotheswar Reddy S/o. Munirathnam Reddy 14 K. Sidda Reddy S/o. Subba Reddy 15 M. Nageswara Rao S/o. Chengamarao 16 T. Subramanyam S/o. T. Muniswamy Naidu 17 K. Chenga Reddy S/o. K. Muthyal Reddy 18 P. Munirathnam S/o. P. Appa Swamy 19 M. Raghuram Reddy S/o. M. Subba Reddy 20 P. Nagaraju S/o. P. Lakshmaiah 21 M. Sreenivasulu S/o. Venkatachalam 22 P. Mukundaiah S/o. P. Krishnaiah 23 T. Amarnatha Reddy S/o. T. Rami Reddy 24 S. Nagaraju Naidu S/o. S. Papi Naidu 25 P. Lokanadha Reddy S/o. P. Siddareddy 26 C. Lakshmana Reddy S/o. C. Krishna Reddy 27 T. Krishnaiah S/o. T. Cherlaiah 28 K. Ramanjulu P. Satyanarayana 29 O. Venkateswarulu S/o. O. Venkatesulu 30 V. Subramanyam Reddy S/o. V. Rami Reddy 31 O. Madhusudan Reddy S/o. Muthyal Reddy 32 T.N. Janardhan S/o. T. Nateshan 33 G. Venugopal S/o. G. Rangaiah 34 Nagaraja Managati S/o. M. Kollappa 35 T. Lokanadha Reddy S/o. T. Ramachandra Reddy 36 D. Gundu Rao S/o. D. Venkatrao 37 V. Muddukrishnaiah S/o. V. Rama Krishnaiah 38 M. Guravaraju S/o. M. Changal Raju 39 G. Varadaraulu S/o. G. Bala Krishnaiah 40 Y. Subramanyam S/o. Y. Govindaiah 41 K. Prabhakaraiah S/o. K. Chanchaiah 42 P. Kannaiah Raju S/o. P. Janardhan Chetty 43 K. Dhananjaya Reddy S/o. K. Krishna Reddy 44 D.Govinda Reddy, S/o. D.Kuppa Reddy, 45 A.Srinivasulu, S/o. A.Chenna Swamy, 46 V.Radhakrishnaiah, S/o. V.Muddu Krishnaiah, 47 P.Gurumoorthy, S/o. P.Siddaiah, 48 D.S.Venugopal, S/o. D.K.Srinivasa Rao, 49 B.Nallappa Reddy, S/o. B.Sidda Reddy, 50 A.Viswanadha Reddy, S/o. A.Kona Reddy, 51 K.Ramakrishna Reddy, S/o. K.Govinda Reddy, 52 B.Murali Gopal, S/o. B.Gannaiah, 53 S.Govardhan Raju, S/o. S.Permal Raju, 54 N.Rama Murthy, S/o. N.Siddalingam, 55 B.Munirathnam Reddy, S/o. B.Munireddy, 56 S.Sankaraiah, S/o. S.Venkatesu, 57 T.Kupparaju, S/o. t.Muni Swamy, 58 M.Murali Krishnaian Chetty, S/o. M.Narayana Chetty, 59 K.Subash Chandra, S/o. Narayana, 60 B.Venkatesulu Reddy, S/o. B.Guruva Reddy, 61 Y.Srinivasulu, S/o. B.Guruva Reddy, 62 K.Vijaya, S/o. K.Kuppaiah Chetty, 63 V.Lokaiah, S/o. V.Peddabba, 64 D.Hanumantha Reddy, S/o. D.Venkat Reddy, 65 G.Nagabhushanam, S/o. G.Subbaramaiah, 66 B.Damodram, S/o. D.Venkatratnam, 67 K.Vijayakumar Naidu, S/o. K.Guravaiah Naidu, 68 M.Harikesava Reddy, S/o. M.Krishna Reddy, (All the petitioners are now under the orders of conversion as Attenders from their respective posts namely Engineering Mazdoors/Gardeners/Forest Mazdoors/Marketing Mazdoors/ Health Mazdoors/ M.N.Os./F.N.Os/PDC Packers etc.) ..... PETITIONERS AND The Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupati Devastanam, Tirupati, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, declaring the impugned proceedings Roc.No.E3/2080/2007 dated 18.07.2008 issued by the respondent as illegal, unjust and suﬀers from lack of jurisdiction and opposed to principles of natural justice and violation of constitutional provisions and consequently declare that petitioners are entitled to be continued as Attenders on their oﬀer of conversion vide Proc.Roc.No.E3/2080/2007 dated 17-7-2008 in their respective places of posting with all consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.G.V.L.MURHTY Counsel for the Respondent: MR.A.K.JAYAPRAKASH RAO (SC FOR TTD) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.16793 OF 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners addressed a letter, dated 13.10.2008, to the Registry stating that he has instructions from the writ petitioners to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. ____________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 14th October, 2008. IBL