\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WW. 15. (s1 No. m }€ /2o1o / Jagannath Prasad Yadav S/o. Shri Harihar Prasad Yadav aged about 4O years, R/o. Village Chunapather, ‘P._S. Sanawal, Dist. Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through: The’Secretary Tribal welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan 'Raipur (C.G.). /2. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal welfare Department Ambikapur Surguja, Surguja (C.G.) \ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION \ IRECTION‘ ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER REsPONDEN'rs 1. OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT D : WW l.” * m 200 . ......WCéMHm mm (Wu) WWW WWW amarémm WW%@W ésaimm SB : Ho‘n‘hie Shri I‘v'iaiiiiiiira fv‘uéi‘né i1 $hrivasia‘v‘a. J. 93-98-2919 m“: an“ n n.'r-.oi‘rlgh, —‘ a couhsei gmi Lme petiiimier. Shri Vinou; Tekam F'anei La'vver for the Staieiresponwiiis. Heam‘. Leameé counSei appeariiig i r the wiiiioner submi‘ss ihat ihe petiticmer i3 ‘iiiiiied i0 ben‘fit ‘f iwo ariva Ice incre‘meiiis- or} accaum on J ,ne havirlg passea‘ B.T.i. éxamina‘tioru befor‘ hi$ appeimmeni ai i‘iis owrx cGSE. it $3 whmiiteci ihai ihe iSSue invoiveci iru ii‘ie pi‘esse'nt peiiiior‘i i$ r10 im‘xger r63 iritégra Emci the same haS been fir:- iiv ueCnuea by me nun me 3upreme Cami if} ihe case of Asfra Saxeiia vs. .‘S ‘at‘e m“ MR 5. 65‘s., 2&69 (fifi £IfFJF€ {36‘} 5?. ii is fut‘ihei' subrniiieci that thi Court has aise iakei" a eimiiar View iru iis oi‘der daiee 06-02-2669 paseed i‘n WP.(3‘;NO.625T 0‘ 2008. Leamed co..eei for ‘ihe petitioruer farmer d awe attemiari of ihie Cou i0 ercjer daied 29-64—2010 pae‘eci in Writ epaeai M1124 0f 2009. whei‘eii‘l i'eiy’itig upcm ihe iud‘gmei’ut of fie Supreme Cou:* m he case of Asha Saxerla (supi‘a) arue‘ the order passed bv tnie Court ‘ frxer Wrii Appeai No.67i2‘09z, dirediorvs have been iSSueci for cohsxiezati h of the caee f‘r ai‘ahf cf two advance circuiar riefed f—GE—wm iesued fhe State of fv’iadh‘v'a incremehfs eS her by Prarjeeh, after verificatioh of fhe f- ts pieaded ih fhe hegifion. Learhed couheei f‘r the r epohriehfs Suhr‘uifr fhrf the base of the pefifiorner wouid aiso be ooheidere oh fhe same fines. ¥ . ih View of fhe efatemeht rrr o’e above fhie petition is firtatiy oisposeo} off with a (tireotioh to the respoho ht authoritiee to coneicter ahu .u cieoiue -44; LL- me Nfg$w>g MQ MWW 3211mm mmm cia§m of the petiiioner for gram df fwo ari‘v’arlce ircreriéms aS gsef ciruu uatecx J m 41' —u§-’i ,a 3T4 -‘ A iSsuea' uv f‘he S z aié 'T L:-- .v ‘i-a i‘rv‘a Prade5-h, afier verifica fieti of éight weeks from ioda’v'. Manindra Mohan Shrivastavaf meg m w 200 m m (Wa) AL- me zlacfs pieacfea‘ iii the iaetiuun w: Iii-u a §