IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No.105 of 2009 Smt. Mithlesh Sharma W/o Shri Naresh Dutt Sharma ........ Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ......... Respondents Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B. S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. 2. Learned Brief Holder for the State submits before this Court that it has been indicated in para 3 of the counter affidavit that the police has completed the investigation and after completion of investigation the police has found that there is a prima-facie case against the petitioner, and as such the police is likely to submit the chargesheet before the Circle Officer concerned. It was further submitted that in view of above the writ petition filed by petitioner seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him has, now, become infructuous. As such, the police is likely to submit the chargsheet in the near future. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 26.03.2009 LSR