IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.15095 of 2008 Between: Mohd. Yaseem Hussain, S/o. Mohd. Hussain, R/o. Flat No. 301, 4th Floor, Naser Residency, Masab Tank, Hyderabad - 500 028. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director General of Police, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. 4 The Deputy Commissioner of Police, City Crime Station, Police Control Room, Fateh Maidan, Hyderabad. 5 Sri Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Not known to the petitioner, Ranigunj, Secunderabad. 6 M/s. Global Travellor Bureau, Rep. by its Proprietor, Abdulla A1-Sinan, Alquddus Street, Alqatif, Saudi Arabia .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents particularly the 4th respondent to forbear and not to interfere in the life and liberty of the petitioner herein in relation to civil disputes and false complaints made by the 5th and 6th respondents of alleged offences on foreign soil, to writ in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and not to harass the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.SAROSH BASTHAWALA Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 4: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.15095 OF 2008 ORDER: On the earlier occasions, i.e. on 22.07.2008 and 07.08.2008, none appeared for the petitioner and there was no representation on his behalf, and therefore the matter was adjourned by two weeks on those two occasions. Even thereafter, when the matter was called on 26.11.2008, none appeared for the petitioner and there was no representation, and hence the matter was directed to be posted today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. In spite of the same, even today, none appears for the petitioner and there is no representation. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 1st December, 2008 IBL