IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI MONDAY, THE 3RD JANUARY 2011 / 13TH POUSHA 1932 RP.No. 179 of 2008(G) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.2588/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): REVIEW PETITIONER/6TH RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------------- R. VIJAYAN, S/O. RAGHAVAN, PERUKUNNATHU HOUSE, MUTHUKULAM SOUTH, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.SASIDHARAN CHEMPAZHANTHIYIL RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5: ----------------------------------------------- 1. K. CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAI, S/O. KESAVA PILLAI, AGED 69 YEARS, PRESIDENT, MUTHUKULAM N.S.S. SAMYUKTHA KARAYOGAM COMMITTEE, OTTAVELIKKAKATHU VEEDU, MUTHUKULAM SOUTH P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD,HARIPAD. 4. THE ASSISTANT DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, MAVELIKKARA GROUP, MAVELIKKARA. 5. THE SUB GROUP OFFICER, PANDAVANKAVU SUB GROUP, MUTHUKULAM,ALAPPUZHA DIST. 6. V. MADHU, S/O. VASUDEVAN, THARUVINKAL, MUTHUKULAM SOUTH, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. SRI.K.N.VENUGOPALA PANICKER FOR TDB THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: A.K.BASHEER & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C.M.Appln.No.81 OF 2008 IN R.P.No.179 OF 2008 & R.P.No.179 OF 2008 IN W.P.(C)No.2588 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 3rd day of January, 2011 ORDER Basheer, J. The grievance of the review petitioner is that he could not get an opportunity to be heard when the writ petition was decided by the Division Bench. 2. The writ petition was filed by respondent No.1 in this review petition alleging that the Advisory Committee had been constituted in violation of the various Clauses contained in Ext.P3 Bye-laws. Admittedly, writ petition was disposed of by the Division Bench as early as on October 3, 2007 with a direction to the Commissioner, Travancore Devaswom Board to examine whether there was any irregularity in the selection made to the Advisory Committee. The Commissioner was directed to take a decision within one month from the date of receipt of copy of the judgment. 3. It is seen from the judgment itself that the tenure of the R.P.No.179/2008 2 Committee was due to expire in January 2008 itself. This review petition was filed in November 2007 with a petition to condone the delay of 16 days. It has been brought up for consideration only now. In any view of the matter, we do not find any justification in entertaining this review petition. Therefore, the delay petition and the review petition are dismissed inlimine. A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE sv. R.P.No.179/2008 2