IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 9434 of 2011-D. Decided on: 23rd November, 2011. Chander Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG, for the Respondets-State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “(a) to issue a writ of mandamus, appropriate writ, order or direction in nature thereof, directing the respondent department to grant the benefit of above judgment to the petitioner with all the consequential benefits; (b) to issue a writ of mandamus, appropriate writ, order or direction in nature thereof, directing the respondents to pay pensionary benefits to the petitioner on the basis of last pay drawn after re- fixation with all consequential benefits.” 2. According to the petitioner, the matter is covered in his favour by the judgment dated 17.6.2008 of this Court in Hira Lal vs. State of H.P. and another. The petitioner 2 may produce a copy of the said judgment along with an appropriate representation before the second respondent, in which case the appropriate action without discriminating the petitioner shall be taken within another four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the second respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 23rd November, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (tr/kck) Judge. 3