^ /^^ ^" IN THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT AT BILASPUR C.G. Miscellaneaus Appeal No.- ^ |'Z—-/ 2006 APPELLANT: Umashanker S/o Shri Ramswaroop Shrivastawa, aged about 48 years,R/o V.A.S. Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G. VERSU^ RESPONDENT: Smt.Vandana W/o Dr.Umashanker Shrivastava R/o-Tatiband Raipur Distt.Raipur C.G. MISCLANIOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION 1^11) OF FAMILY COURT ACT: - 1 ^; ^N^ HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR MVISION BENCH: HON'BLE MR. I.M.QUbbUSI & HON'BLE MR. PR^SHANT KUMAR MISHM. JJ. ^ppellant Respondent M.A. No.912/2006 Umashanker Vs Smt. Vandana Pnssents Mr M.K< Baig, Advocate for the appellant. OftbER fOran (11th January, 2011) I.M. Quddusi. J; 1. Heard on M.C.P. No.1256/2006, an application forcondonation of deloEy in preferring ^ie instant appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant states that 1+ie appellant wants to withdraw 1+iis appeal and therefore he does not want to press this application for condonation of delay (MCP No.1256/2006). 3. Accordingly, 1+ie M.C.P. No.1256/2006 is dismissed as not pres^d. Consequently, the instouit oppeal is aiso dismissed as time barred. ftoshan. Sd/- I.M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge