IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21743 of 2011 Santosh Upadhya @ Santosh Kr. Upadhya Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02. 22.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 20/2011 for the offences under Sections 272/273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 47(A) of the Excise Act, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara. The petitioner is owner of a shop with valid license where some foreign and country made wine were recovered. As it appears from the report of Excise Department letter no. 447 dated 16.05.2011. It appears that only due to some jurisdictional error, raid was conducted and case appears instituted. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara, in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 20/2011, subject to 2 condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)