IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25621 of 2009 SATISH YADAV SON OF SRI RAM BRIKSHA YADAV, R/O VILLAGE- MILKIDAR,P.S.- RAHUI, DISTRICT- NALANDA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6 01/02/2010 Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner who is the husband of the deceased seeks bail in a case which has been registered under Sections 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Informant’s daughter Guriya Devi married in the year 2002 with this petitioner was alleged to be killed by her in-laws within seven years of her marriage on account of her inability to bring the desired dowry articles from her parents. Submission is that in course of investigation it has come that the victim was suffering from Diarrhoea and other elements for which she was admitted to Verma Nursing Home where she was treated by Dr. Ashok Kumar Verma a qualified doctor but she could not survive. This fact has been stated by the doctor himself when he was examined by the investigating officer. Prayer for bail has been opposed by the learned APP assisted by the learned counsel for the informant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the 2 case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M./concerned Court, in connection with Rahui P.S. Case No. 185 of 2008. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)