BENCH : HON'BLE SHR! H.L DATTU, C<J. PETIT.IQNER Present: W. P. No.4038 OT1894 Smt. Mamta Gupta, V\//o Shri Raju Gupta, Aged 28 years, R/o Takhatpur, District Bilasptin M.P. VERSUS 1. State Election Commisslon, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopai< 2. The Retuming Officer, Nagar Panchayat Takhatpur Election, Biiaspur, M.P. 3. Smt. Krishna Agrav^ai, VV/o Shri Mulchand Agrawai; R/o Pathakpara-Takhatpur, Biiaspur, M.P. 4. Smt Farzana W/o Shri Shabeer, R/o Takhatpur Biiaspur; ivl.P. 5. Smt. Murdiya W/o ;Ja!il Shah, R/0 Takhatpur, Biiaspur, M.P. Writ Petitlon under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of india. None appears for the petitioner. ORAL ORDER (Passedon4tnJVIay,2007) When the case was called out for hearing, none appeared nor any representation was made on behalf of the petitloner. The petitioner may not be interested in the rnatter. Therefore, this v^rit petition is rejected for non-prosecution. (2) Registry is directed to send a certified copy of thls order to the petltioner forthwlth. - (3) Liberty is resen/ed to the petitioner to make appropriate appiication, if she so desires, seeking revival ofthe writ petition. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- Chief Justice / .'^