1 cri4820.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4820 OF 2010 _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________ Mr. S.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. S.N. Kendre, A.P.P. for respondent /State. Date : 6th December, 2010 1 Heard. 2. The appellants are now seeking bail during pendency of the appeal. The appeal is already admitted. The appellants are convicted under Section 304-I r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and are sentenced to suffer R.I. for 10 years etc. I went through the record with the help of the learned Counsels for the parties and realised that there is certainly some evidence against the appellant no.3. It is alleged that it was she who poured the kerosene on the person of the deceased and set her on fire. There are two Dying Declarations naming her to 2 cri4820.10 be the perpetrator but during attack it is seen that the other appellants did not take part at all. So their conviction for culpable homicide is rather far fetched. They deserve bail. Even the appellant no.3 deserves bail because she was on bail earlier. Besides she is woman. The appellants be released on bail, on their executing P.R. bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs.Ten thousand) each and on furnishing one surety in the like amount. The bail bonds shall be furnished before the Trial Court. 3. The Criminal application stands disposed of. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] gas/cri4820.10