HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR CRL.R.C.No.1512 of 2011 ORDER: Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 2. By the order under challenge in this revision, the Family Court at Rajahmundry granted a sum of Rs.3,500/- per month towards maintenance to the minor daughter of the petitioner herein. 3. The relationship between the parties is not in dispute. A perusal of the impugned order would show that the Family Court elaborately dealt with all the aspects and concluded that the petitioner is in principle liable to pay the maintenance to his daughter and further he has also got means to pay a sum of Rs.3,500/- per month which it fixed. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner says that this amount of Rs.3,500/- is beyond the means of the petitioner and the Family Court did not consider his means factor at all. There is no force in this contention. It may be noted that the Family Court order would show that this petitioner has got some lands also and further the petitioner’s daughter is shown as aged 4 years in 2009 and she may be school going now. Taking into account all these factors, I am of the opinion that there is no ground to interfere with the order of the Family Court. 5. Accordingly this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed at the admission stage. _________________________ JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR 21-07-2011 Gsn.