IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 5343 of 2011. Decided on: 13.7.2011. __________________________________________________________ Jameel Mohammed … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. … Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. for the respondents No. 1 & 2. ___________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral). The petitioner is a PTA Teacher. He is aggrieved since he has been replaced by the 3rd respondent who is a regular teacher. According to the petitioner, there are two places where the 3rd respondent is willing to work and that the 3rd respondent is entitled for accommodation in one of the two places after rendering longer service in District Chamba. 2. The petitioner has produced the willingness of the 3rd respondent before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner will approach the 2nd respondent by way of a representation, in which case the 2nd respondent will look into the matter. In case the 3rd respondent as per his willingness and as per the convenience is accommodated in one of the above stated two places, the petitioner shall be allowed to continue as PTA. The needful shall be done within ten days from the date of production of copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition. 3. The writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. A duly authenticated copy of this judgment be supplied to the parties. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. (Justice V.K. Sharma) July 13, 2011. Judge. (cr) 2