:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. WRIT PETITION NO. 2892 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 2892 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 2892 OF 2005 WITH WITH WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 66 OF 2006 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 66 OF 2006 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 66 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2892 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 2892 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 2892 OF 2005 Britto Charles and 20 Ors ....Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra and 19 Ors. ....Respondents. ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 465 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 465 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 465 OF 2006 Abdul Rashid Abdul Rehman Yusuf ...petitioner. vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors...Respondents :2: Vijay Thorat Sr. Adv. a/w. A.R. Pande for the petitioner. Pradeep Jadhav, AGP for Respondent no.1 to 4. Jai chinai a/w. Sanjay Jani i/by Rajesh Shukla for respondent no.5. D.H. Mehta i/by. Pankaj Kansara for Respondent no.6. S.P. Nagvenkar for Respondent no.7. Milind Sathe a/w. G.S. Singh i/by. V.M. Bhardwaj for Respondent no.21 and Petitioner. in W.P.(L) No. 465 of 2006. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATED: 20TH MARCH,2006. P.C. : 1. By consent of the parties the following order is passed : 2. The Respondent no.5 states that he will give a copy of the lease deed to the petitioner within a :3: period of one week from today. Learned counsel for the petitioners in both the petitions states that they will make the necessary applications for vacating and/or setting aside and/or modifying and/or reviewing the impugned order dated 14.11.2005 within a period of 2 weeks from today. On such applications being made the Deputy Director of Land Record i.e. the Respondent no.2 in W.P. No. 2892 of 2005 to hear both the applications afresh and reconsider the impugned order dated 14.11.2005. The Deputy Director of Land Records is directed to give hearing to all the parties and pass necessary orders on or before 30.4.2006. Till and until the necessary orders are passed by the Deputy Director of Land Records on the applications of both the petitioners the impugned order will remain suspended. 3. In view of the order passed in Writ Petition No. 2892 of 2005 and Writ Petition (L) No. 465 of 2000 both are disposed off. In view thereof Chamber Summons no. 66 of 2006 also does not survive and the same is dismissed as infructious. :4: sd/- *********