CRM-M No. 34543 of 2011 **** Santosh and another v. State of Haryana Present: Mr. Sunil Panwar, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Preeti Choudhary, AAG, Haryana. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No.332 dated 11.10.2011, under Sections 147, 148 323, 452 and 506 IPC registered at Police Station Sohna, District Gurgaon. On 16.11.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that the present is a case of fight between the neighbours where both sides have received injuries.” Apart from that learned counsel has argued that there is a delay of 23 hours in lodging the FIR. Learned AAG, on instructions from HC Ombir Singh, has accepted the fact that some injuries were also there on the side of the petitioners and that there was a delay of 23 hours but has stated that injuries on the petitioners side were too inconsequential and the investigation had revealed that the petitioners had entered the house of the complainant. In view of the facts which have been admitted and without in any way denigrating the argument of learned AAG, in my considered opinion, at this stage it would not be in the interest of justice to deny the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Let the petitioners appear before the investigating officer on 06.12.2011 between 10.00 a.m. and 4.00 p.m. and on any other date on which their presence is required by him. The CRM-M No. 34543 of 2011 -2- investigating officer shall release them on bail to his satisfaction, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE November 23, 2011 sunita