"7" —78 'S^ ^ww^, ^>^\w\<o, [®ldl-(-llj,< ^iNdl *<4Jek """t^lP't'p""5?&"^/7^'CT5t200 3T^?f Tra^> ( yi^^) 3??^T'^Tf^TW 'Wl^TT^T^W^T WTTW^f?H3^y MLGMQUUKTQFQyMA SingjeSeocn; non?Di€^ Writ Petition fCllNo.5066 of 2009 Petitioner LaIitjTiwari, son of Late Shyama Charan TIw^ri, aged 70 years, R/o Civil Station, Raip|ur (C.G.) Respondents vert 1. Stat4 z. 3. The 4. Nazilii WRIT PETiTiON UNDERARTiCLa: tNOlA Present: Dr. Nirmai Kumar Shukia, iearned sertior counsej with Ms. Ritu Mishra for thepetitjoner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govemment Adv^cate for tne Srate/respcndente. oM<4F<n^li 'RPToTf'? fe^" <f^^s< ^r 3<Rm 3?i^i Ti50AKJl:^lLASpUR7 hn Dhirendra Fviishra, J. us of Chhattisgarh, Through the Department of Town D.K.S. Bnawan, raiaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Secslstary, Adnlnistration, Mant Thej thfQif Munl Municipai Corporation, Raipur sgh the CommissiQner, The cipai Corporation, Raipur (C.G.) ;oiiector, Raipur C.G.) Officer, Raipur (C.G.) 22s OF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF Y V^ TocT^II^Krl^ ^Tl1<rl/l<o, rs)l<ni<H^< .M;.lp.6?.«.s.Att./.....^ *<1»1<11 t(»*11<S|» ' / «1 3TI^?T xf^K (licli^^) ^s^ ^»TRi'ii^ TOT 3:SI^Tsri^iici> ti ti I^TTW^teT^^r ORALOrtDER (Passed on O^ The petitioner has nied this petjti' 10.1 Therefore, it is prayed th| set as'de the action dl Respondent cancdied tf fa.iied to Drovjde the !ar|d Hon'bie Court be furtherl to execute a iease deedl acquired from the petstiot as per tne guide iine cf premium in the interest oflthe State tif thjs Hon'bie Court be pjeased to the Respondent whereby the ie tease cf Budhapam iand and situated in CMI Station. This Ipleased to dlrect the Respondent |of an area equivaient to the land 'er after comparative assessment rpaipur Sration without presence of 10.2 That this Hon'bte Court Respondents to dec'de tjie reference to rent and terrrts in his ravour and pendingl 10.3 Any other relief which proper in the above csrcur Dr. N.K.Shukia, iearned Senior lat the petitioner's perpetual iease o B^dhapara has been canceiied vide Ar hje respondent authorjties and by the Sc l.n. has been atlotted to the petitjonei ^nt as per speci'at terms and,conditi< ^titioner has atready submitted his ol s^pondent authorities in passing the o CbNi^^l^ 'W^* ^ 'fe^ Tf^R?R ^r^tRFT^Rn^T 09.2009) n and prayed for fotiowing reliefs: may be pjeased to direct the object'on of the PetJtioner \"'th of the iand wnich is to be setlled beforethe State. nay be deemed necessary and istances may be awarded. Sounsei for the petitioner submits f the land in dispute aiiotted at Inexure P/1 dated 24.01.2008 by |me order jand admeasuring 5000 with an exorbitant premium and |ns mentioned in the order. The yection against the action of the fder dated 24.01.2008 (Annexure ^w^ ^^br 5^11^ itvd-ii^ik—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000. ^^s^^_ ^ ''^ '%:^»J ^T^r^T^TW ^CT^T^T^^Iqi IU* *11*1^11 »•<!<»» '3~5ET ^|q|<nq, ^Tl|^^|(o, [®l<ni<H^< ..^£C^.().:£oft.b.. -^2009 ^?11(T^T (yif^^) '^CTW^tey^n^r ^y>^ P/1), by way of fiiing representatjo|i representanons have not been conti authorities. 3. Dr. N.K.Shukia, learned Serti may be disposed of with a direct consider the represenmtion / accordance with iaw. 4. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, respondents submits that he has n^ with a direction to concerned representation / objection of the peti] 5. in view of the submissions this petitjon is disposed of with ii| representation against the order Authority raising ail the grievance^ representation / objection being fii| No.1 shail deciae the representatic|n within a period of 2 months from objection. it is made clear that the | merit without being infiueneed by order. 4v ^)N?NN 'w?^f^ 'fe1^ <Fai^s< '^3TfiiHCT^?T ^s vide Annexure P/10. However, his sidered and decided by the concerned jor Counsei submits that this petition ;ion to the respondent authorities to o|3jection and decide the same in iearn|ed Government Advocate for the objection if the petition is disposed of aulhorities to conslder and decide the tioner in accordance with law. the iearned counsei for the parties, i|)eriy to the petitioner to nie a fresh ^nnexure P/1 before the Competent as raised in the petition. On such ii^d by the petitioner, the respondent /' objection in accordance with law date of receipt of representation /' Imatter is to beconsidered on its own iny of the observations made in this the Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^1^<^1^ ^^T ^TT^ET <|'3|^K<|M—FS/95—11 /2008—1,00,000.