IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4805 of 2009 BIJAY KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 16.04.2009 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 26.3.2009 cancelling the earlier order dated 28.2.2009 appointing the petitioner as an Acting Headmaster of Gandhi High School, Bhelwar Circle, Ghodasahan and directing appointment of fresh Incharge Headmaster. From the pleadings in the writ petition and the impugned order dated 26.3.2009 it is apparent that it is the respondents who are resorting to adhocism, creating litigation. While the petitioner does not have any legal right to demand appointment or continuance as an Incharge Headmaster, the respondents are under statutory obligation to appoint a regular Headmaster. The situation perhaps suits both the petitioner and the respondents. In between, it is the institution which suffers. No claim can be founded in a writ petition for adhocism. Simultaneously, the respondents cannot be permitted to create anarchy by adhocism. Keeping in mind the interest of the institution, which is stated to be a school, this Court directs that within two weeks from the date that the petitioner produces a copy of this order before the concerned respondents, the authorities shall appoint a regular Headmaster in the School in accordance with the rules and the law. On expiry of the period of two weeks from the date of service of a copy of this order, any Incharge arrangement made by the respondents shall cease to operate. This shall be with all its consequences leaving the institution without a Headmaster. It shall then be for the respondents themselves to find a solution in law. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)