22.07.2009 Present: Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma and Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate Generals for respondents No.1 to 3. The petitioner has assailed the order passed by the Committee constituted by the State Government, vide Notification dated 27.5.2008 and also the order passed in appeal by the Deputy Commissioner, Mandi. The case of the petitioner in nutshell is that the report of the Committee and the appellate order are against the law and facts. According to Ms. Ranjana Parmar, the appointment of the petitioner by the Parent Teacher Association was in accordance with law. The learned Advocate General has refuted this submission. It is apparent from the combined reading of the report as well as the appellate order that subject expert was not associated by the Parent Teacher Association. The President of the Parent Teacher Association was not eligible as his child was not studying in the school at the time of interview. The order passed by the Deputy Commissioner dated 6.2.2009 is self-contained. Consequently, there is no merit in the present petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. CMP No.2201/2009 In view of the dismissal of the writ petition, this application is also dismissed. (Jagdish Bhalla), CJ. (Rajiv Sharma), J. July 22, 2009. (rkv)