[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVN. APPLN.NO.360 OF 2008 Dnyaneshwar Popat Tambe ..Petitioner Vs. Nishikant Jayram Suryavanshi and Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.Rameshwar N.Gite advocate for Petitioner Mr.Ashish Gaikwad Adv. for Respondent No.1 Mr.H.J.Dedia A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : AUGUST 13, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 13, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 13, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the petitioner-original accused and the learned advocate for the respondent-original complainant. The complainant is present in Court. 2. By judgment and order dated 12.2.2007 the learned Judicial Magistrate F.C. Nasik convicted the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Being aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred appeal i.e. Appeal No.43 of 2007. In the appeal, conviction came to be confirmed, hence, this revision. [-2-] 3. During the pendency of this revision, the parties have amicably settled the matter. The learned advocate for the complainant states that in view of the settlement, the matter may be compounded and the accused may be acquitted. The affidavit of the complainant to the above effect is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. In view of the above facts, the case is compounded and the petitioner-accused is acquitted thereunder. The petitioner be released forthwith if not required in any other case. 4. Revision is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]