IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1106 of 2008 SURESH PRASAD SINGH SON OF SHRI RAM PRASAD SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHIPURA, P.S. JANDAHA, DISTRICT VAISHALI AT PRESENT PANCHAYAT SEWAK, BLOCK OFFICE, MAHNAR, P.S. MAHNAR, DISTRICT VAISHALI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MAHNAR, P.S. MAHNAR, DISTRICT VAISHALI. 3. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, MAHNAR POLICE STATION, DISTRICT VAISHALI. 4. LALMUNI DEVI W/O LATE GANGA SAGAR PASWAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BISHANPUR, P.S. MAHNAR, DISTRICT VAISHALI. ----------- 6 13.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also respondent no. 4. The prayer of the petitioner is for quashing the FIR vide Mahnar P.S. Case No. 146/06 registered for the offences under Sections 420, 409, 467 and 468/34 IPC. The allegation against petitioner is with respect to the disbursement of money on account of Indra Awas Yojana in favour of the respondent no. 4, identifying the thumb impression of the said respondent no. 4. The basic allegations are that the money is not being disbursed to her. Learned counsel submits that during investigation the said respondent no. 4 has expected for receiving the money and has also accordingly informed the District Magistrate, nonetheless the investigation is 2 pending. However, cognizance has not been taken as yet. Learned counsel for the State submits that when the FIR is lodged, the police after investigation shall submit the police report pending before the District Magistrate. As such, at this stage the prayer of the petitioner for quashing the F.I.R. is not justified. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The writ application is accordingly dismissed. Amrendra/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)