P‘ ,9 \W aww mm: 5 IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH Ai BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) N0.‘$S 6! [2010. 51,1“ z m 5§a£wA a PETITIONER: Jagannath (w Prasad Singh, son of Late Lalmuni Singh, aged about 55 years, wbrking as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Khatanga, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. Resgondents 1. R State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. District Education Officer, Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. Block Education Officer, Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh “x WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ”III/Mfr...— wFGX/‘hg-gg/ c zoo aim m ("shaim WWW wmm WW§WW vaaaifanm WWW Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 19.7.2010 Shn' C.J.K. Rao, counse for The petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Advocate for the state, on advance copy. The petitioner was app inted on the post of Deputy Teacher on 22. 11. 1973, on probation, on fixed pay of Rs. 100] - . After completion of his probation, he was grant d regular pay—scale. Learned counsel app for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the case is s to whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale with effect m the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period The issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh. State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O,A.No.2745/89 [Madhukant Yadu and 56 others v. State of M.P. 85 others), wherein, it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale with effect flom the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court by the State in S.L.P. No.6892/ 1993 which was dismissed by the Supreme Court, vide order dated 3.1.1994, upho ' g the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers] Assis t Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial a pointment. . e ' g o mm F1200 31mm (Wu) mmfaw ammm WW§WW WWW ”L émifanm In Ilumber of cases, Court has passed orders dimming the respondents to consider the C ses. Praveen Accordingly, this petiu' n is also disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to make representa 'on, if so advised, to consider his case on its own merits and perspec 'Ve. The petitioner may also supply the copy of petition along with th representation. If the petitioner stands on the same footings as per order passed by the Madhya Pradesh e Administrah've Tribunal in O.A. No.2745/ 89 Madhukant Y u (supra) and subsequently confirmed by the Supreme Court in S. P. (Civil) No.6892/93 by order dated 3.1.1994, appropriate orde would be passed by the respondent authority. k Sd/— if Manindra Mohan Shrivastava ' Judge 's t