IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16593 of 2007 Saryoo Prasad, Son of Late Jagadamb Shahay, resident of Chhoti Khanjarpur, P.S. Barari, S.M. College Road , ( Kashi Mistri Lane),District- Bhagalpur --------------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna 2. The Secretary, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna 3. The Vice-Chancellor, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, District- Bhagalpur 4. The Registrar, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 5. The Principal ,Marwari College, Bhagalpur, District- Bhagalpur -------------------------------- Respondents. ---------------------------------- 10 09-08-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent nos.3 and 4/ Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University. The present writ petition was filed in the year 2007 with a prayer to direct the Respondents to pay all the retiral dues of the petitioner. In this case, number of affidavits have been filed by the parties. Learned counsel for the University submits that along with 5th counter affidavit filed on behalf of the University, the University has brought on record an order dated 14.2.2009 passed by the Registrar of the University. It was submitted that in view of the order dated 14.02.2009, most of the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from the order dated 14.02.2009, it is evident that on the date of order passed by the Registrar of the University , amount of Rs.77,816/- as arrear 2 of pension and amount of Rs.4,13,931/0 as difference of salary were outstanding. He further submits that the arrear of pension i.e. Rs.77, 816/- was already paid to the petitioner. However, he is not aware as to whether the amount of difference of salary has been paid or not. 5th counter affidavit on behalf of the University was filed in the month of November, 2009. In view of the facts and circumstances, particularly the fact that most of the retiral dues of the petitioner have already been paid, there is no need to keep the matter further pending. The writ petition stands disposed of. Since neither learned counsel for University nor learned counsel for the petitioner is aware regarding the clearance of the amount of difference of salary, the Court is of the opinion that liberty can be granted to the petitioner to approach Respondent no.3/ Vice-Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur by way of filing a representation, if any amount is due. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, Respondent no.3 is required to examine the same and pass order for payment of the dues. If any of the dues, as indicated in Annexure-D i.e. order dated 14.2.2009 passed by the Registrar of the University, still exists, payment to the petitioner shall be made within a period of one month from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)