PETITIONER @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(snNo. M%"L1?: 0F2011(S.B.). Abdul Sajid Khan, S/o. late Shri Mohammad Khan, aged about 3_9 years, Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School Aasulkhar, Block Bhanupratappur, District Kankor (C. G.) .‘/( VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretaly, School Education DEpartment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) District Education Officer, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C. G.) Block Education Officer, Bhanupratappur, Distt. Kanker (C. G.) Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner begs to submit as underh % E'HGH COURT OF CHHATI‘ISQAW AT BELA$PHR SB : HGN’ELE $HR} JUETKCE MARKNIJ‘M MOE-{AN SHRIVAETgVA wwwm 4mm.“ .. W P 13R N!) 452$¥2011 PETXTIwNER Abdll}. ‘Sawi .mxsui yersws RE$PONIJENT§ State of {3. “a. (‘31, Qihcrs EMT PETI’MON UNDER ARTICLE 2261222? OF ’N'IE COE‘Slxgi‘U‘TIQW OF INBKA Aggeammte: $3hnT Somkant Verma, counscl for tbs petilicner. Shri N.Naha Roy, PL. for the Siam; mSpondenm. ()RAL gREER {11.08.2611} The pm'itioner was iniii’jally appaimai as; ’}‘each¢r (m a fiXeC} {my of R‘s. 100. After comylstion 0f probation parioch bf: was gramm‘i regnlar pay scaic of'Rs. lag—303, Cmmse] for tbs petitimmr $1,1bmitx that ma issued involvml in the case: is as to whéthm‘ tha pmit'umer is antitlcad to raguiar pay snak with tai‘fect from the :iatg of initial appwintmam or aftm‘ comphtion 0f probation perioci The issut: mvoived herein Wcw coxmidaraci by mt: Madhya PradEsb State. Adminisirafjva Tribunal, Jahalyur m 0A. Na. 27$5g’89 {Madhukant Yadu and 5§ athers m wmte wf M;F. & Other$}, whcram i1 was ham {hat mt: Similarly situatad t‘ciaclmm are eafit'icd 11a regular pay $51k: with effect from the data of im'fial ammintment. The waiter was taken up 1:0 tha Han’blc Suprmnt: Court. The appeal was cliSm'i$scd by the. Hon’blc Supreme Court upholding thne dec‘iSion of the ’I‘rjhuna} to the Effmt that the. ’I‘eachars] ASsigtant ’I‘cachers are. m1titk:d to regular pay sta}? fmm the date of initial appointmalt. CnunSe] for tha patitionar fmthtfr submim that this Court, while considaing thg asaint: issme in Amar Swl Ram & {khem V3. State of Chhattiggm'h & Others, WJ’JS} Na. 4f?2$/2006, by 0mm Within a period oftcn days, raising all the griavauces. a I‘spmSctnmh'Qn Accommgly, (mic-(E 01.09.2005, aHowed ma p6i’ifioners to make, the: petitiomar is gmmzad Iibsriy to maké: a mpmsentation raising all the grievanms; and 13:1 mm, flm concsxxmd if any: in :e with Iaw, on its own marit‘s: wifhin a pen'od of i‘hme vexiiication 0f thc facts‘ In vitiw of thg fartigoing, this patih'ml 1‘3 digmsml 0£ NO 0rdm a's to costs. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge mspondent is directed, to dscidc the repres€ntati0m accordam months from th¢ (Eate 0f mcaipt of the rcprftsentaé‘iam subjam 1:0