1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO.95 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2016 OF 2011 Dr.Suresh s/o Janardhan Babar .. Petitioner Versus The Registrar, University of Pune, Pune and ors. ..Respondents Mr M.R.Dhamane, Advocate for petitioner CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 25th April 2011 PER COURT 1. The petitioner has preferred the present review petition contending that the order passed by this Court on 5.4.2011 should be reviewed. The order was passed by the Bench in which one of us ( Justice M.T.Joshi ) was a member. 2. We have considered the review petition and we do not fine any reason to review the order. It appears that the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed because issues have been considered erroneously and, therefore, he has not got justice from the Court, according to him. No new material has been brought before us to show that the order should be reviewed. This cannot be a reason for reviewing the order. Review Petition is dismissed. ( M.T. JOSHI, J. ) ( SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. ) (vvr/95.11ra)