IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 997 of 2004 (M/B) Shri Dhani Ram Saklaani and others ……Petitioner. Versus State of Uttaranchal and others ……Respondents JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J (Oral) Petitioner’s counsel absent. Sri J.P. Joshi, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for respondents 1, 2, 3,4, 6 and 7. Sri U.K. Uniyal, Senior Advocate with Sri Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for respondent no. 5. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 06.06.2006 06.06.2006 A