IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3388 of 2011 PANKAJ KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ----------- 3 12.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. The petitioner is named in the FIR and it is specifically stated by the informant that when the villagers of Maniyawan including the deceased, Satish Kumar came in rescue of the informant and others, they were assaulted by the petitioner and other co-accused persons with Lathi and subsequently, in course of treatment, Satish Kumar died. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in course of investigation, the informant as well as other witnesses have not stated any specific role said to be played by the petitioner rather an omnibus allegation of assault as well as pelting stones have been levelled against the petitioner and other co-accused persons. It would appear from perusal of the impugned order that the deceased sustained several injuries on his person but it is not specific as to whether the fatal injury of the deceased has been caused by the petitioner or not. Moreover, some co-accused persons have already been granted privilege of bail whereas the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 02.06.2009. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and 2 circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Pankaj Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Kako P.S. Case No. 50 of 2009 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)