HjGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH: BSLASPUR Writ Petition No. 1189 of 2001 Petltloners 4. 8. 9. Hamara Transport Company, Durg, through Its Partnsr Smt. Motiyan Devi Subbarwai, 'vV/o.Late H.S. Sabbarwai, aged about 70 years, resident of Nehru Nagar, Durg. Hariklran Agrawai, aged 42 years, S/o. Late Krishna Kumr Agrawal, resident of Contractors Colony, G.E. Road, Bhilai. Dr. Sudhlr Shukla, S/o. Chaker^vani Shukla, aged 45 y©ars,resldent of Nehru Nagar, Bhi.iai. S^uriidhar Agrav^al, about 47 years, S/o. Sardarmai Agrav/al, (Shri Alren Traders) r/b» Contractor Coiony, G,E, Road, Bhliaj. Gaurishankar Agrawal, 44 years, S/o, Sardar Mal Agrawa! (Shri Airen Steel Traders) resldent of Contractor Coiony, G.E. Road, Bhiiai. Om Prakash Gupta, S/o. Late Jagrat Ram Gupta, aged 54 years, resl.dent of Contractor Cosony, G.E. Road, Bhilai- Surender Kumar Agrawal, S/o. Late Shri Gian Chand Agrawai, aged 42 years, resident of Contractor Colony, G.E. Road, Bhllal. Surinder Kumar Gupta, aged 60 years, S/o. Lats Shri V@d Prakash Gupta, resident of G.E. Road, Contractor CoSony, Bhliai. Smt. Vlrender Kaur Chhabra, aged 55 ysars, W/o. Shri Nanak Singh Chhabra, resident of Sonai Compiex, resident of Contractor Colony, G.E. Road, BhJiai. 10. Bairam Chand Slngh, aged 33 years, S/o. Shri Krishna Chand Slngh, Jal Durga Steej Traders, resictent of Contractor Co!ony,G.E.Road,Bhj|ai. 11. K.K. Sahdevan, aged 50 years, S/o. K.K. Kakku, resldent of Sahadevan Car Garage Shastri Nagar, G.E. Road, Bhiiai @ Respondente 12. V.T. Mathew.S/o. V. IVIathew Thomas, ag©d53 years, resident of Sahadevan Car Garage, Shastri. Nagar, G.E. Road, BhiSal. 13. Assocsate Automoblles through partner Jai Shanker Agrawai, S/o. iate Shri Ram Gopa! Agrawai, aged 40 years, ofShastri Nagar, G.E. Road. Bhliaj. 14. N. Sharath Babu, S/o. Late Shri N. Ethlrajulu, ag©d 43 years, resldent of Shastri SMagar, G.E. Road, Bhiiai. 15. N. Shekhar Babu, S/o. Late Shri N. Ethlrajulu, aged 43 years, resldent of Shastri. Nagar, G.E. Road, Bhilai. Versus 1. The State of Chhattlsgarh through the Secretery. Departmenf of Urban Adininistration Deveiopnfient, D.K. Bullding, Raipur. 2. yunlcipai Corporation BhiSal, through its Commissloner CorporatioR Building, Biial, District Durg. 3. Assistant Dlrector, Town and Ccuntr^ Planning, Durg, (Chhattisgarh). Petltion under Article 226/227 of Constitution of Sndla) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri V.R. Tiwari, counsel for thepetitioners. Shri Vivek Verrna, Panel Lawyer for the Stete. • ORAL (Passed on this 29th day of September, 2008) Ths petitioners Impugn the notice dated 9-12/3/2001 (Annexure P/1), whereby the petjtioners were directed to appear before the ofricer'on speclal duty, Department of Urban Adnninlstration and Deveiopnnent on 22-5-2001. On'24-7-2001 this -court obseived that "untl! further orders the proceedlngs may go on b-ut the final order shaSI not be passed." • ^j It js not clear whether proceedings have been concluded or not, However, m the facts of th@ case, if the petltloners. not flied reply to the -3- notice, they rrsay flie the same wlthln a penod of 15 days and the State authorities may pass an appropriate order after cooslderjng their reply to the noticedated 9-12/3/2001 (Annexure P/1). 3) In vlew of the foregoing, nothing surv'ives for adjudjcation in the matter. 4) Accordlngly, this petitlon staaids disposed of.. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge