IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2298 of 2010 MANISH KUMAR @ KARU @ KARU SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 05.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner under Sections 419 and 420 of the Penal Code, in custody since 5.10.2009 is that he is alleged to one of the 17 persons standing in queue for withdrawal from the A.T.M., when the camera simply identifies him as one of the 17 persons without any further material that the alleged fraudulent withdrawal was done by him except his own alleged confession. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gaya in connection with Civil Lines P.S. Case No. 322 of 2009. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)