1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Appli. No.335/2008 (Kishna Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 04, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. Sandeep Mehta, for the petitioner. Mr. J.P.S.Choudhary, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the police investigation diary. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the first informant entered into an agreement in respect of Khasra No.352/02 Chak Kolasar and on the basis of the agreement, he sold the land. The land sold is Khasra No. 899 measuring 6.43 hectares and it is the case of the first informant that though he never executed the power of attorney in favour of petitioner Kishna Ram, yet on the basis of forged power of attorney, the sale deed has been executed. Looking to the serious allegation of forging the power of attorney and the fact that there is no agreement with regard to Khasra No.899, which is subject matter of the case, in my 2 view, it is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The bail application filed by the petitioner under section 438 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-