IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT TUESDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2008 / 1ST ASWINA 1930 Crl.MC.No. 3522 of 2008() ------------------------- CP.56/2008 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, KARUNAGAPPALLY CRIME NO.17/07 OF CHAVARA POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONER: ACCUSED ------------------- ANILKUMAR S/O. MUTHUKRISHNAN SOORYAN PARAMBIL, WARD NO.3 PUTHEN THURA NEENDAKARA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY. BY ADV. SRI.K.SANIL KUMAR RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT ------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.GIKKU JACOB THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT, J ------------------------------------ Crl.M.C. No.3522 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2008 ORDER Petitioner, who faces indictment in a prosecution under Section 304 B, who was enlarged on bail at the crime stage as per orders of this Court and against whom after taking cognizance the learned Magistrate has issued a warrant of arrest in C.P.No.56 of 2008 on the ground that he did not appear before the learned Magistrate until cognizance was taken, has come before this Court with a prayer that directions under Section 482 Cr.P.C may be issued to the learned Magistrate to consider his application for regular bail, which he intends to file, on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously - on the date of surrender itself. 2. Sufficient general directions have already been issued in Alice George v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police [2003(1) KLT 339] and I am not persuaded to agree that it is necessary for this Court in every subsequent application to issue directions under Section 482 Cr.P.C to the learned Magistrates to comply with the direction in Alice George v. The Deputy Crl.M.C. No.3522 of 2008 2 Superintendent of Police [2003(1) KLT 339]. Every court must do the same. If the same is not done, it shall be open to the parties to move the superior courts and make complaint about such non compliance. No specific or special directions appear to be necessary in these circumstances. 3. This Crl.M.C is, in these circumstances, dismissed, but with the above specific observations. 4. Hand over a copy of this order to the learned counsel for the petitioner for production before the court below. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) rtr/-