Crl. W. P. No. 1689 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. W. P. No. 1689 of 2011 Date of Decision : September 13, 2011 Sudesh .... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. H. S. Baath, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ranbir Singh Rawat, AAG, Punjab for respondents no.1 to 3. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Reply by way of affidavit of respondent no.2 – District Magistrate, filed today in Court by learned State counsel pursuant to order of the preceding date, is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. The reply affidavit states that the Committee constituted by respondent no.2 submitted report that the petitioner was not found at the brick kiln and he was never working in the brick kiln in question. However, the report was to be made not regarding the petitioner, but regarding the alleged detenues, mentioned in paragraph 4 of the writ petition. The report furnished by Crl. W. P. No. 1689 of 2011 2 respondent no.2 does not refer to the alleged detenues. Respondent no.2 should be careful in furnishing affidavit in this Court. Counsel for the petitioner states that the detenues have since been released. In view of the aforesaid, the instant Habeas Corpus writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. September 13, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE