IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST MAY 2008 / 31ST VAISAKHA 1930 WP(C).No. 12697 of 2008(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. S.SREEKUMARI, W/O.TRIVIKRAMON NAIR, HOUSE NO. 59, TC 2/152, MOSQUE LANE, KESAVADASAPURAM, TRIVANDRUM. 2. G.S.PADMAKUMARI, T.C.2/163, MOSQUE LANE, HOUSE NO.41, KESAVADASAPURAM, TRIVANDRUM. 3. S.FATHIMUTHU BEEVI, T.C.13/2003, HOUSE NO.61, MOSQUE LANE, KESAVADASAPURAM, TRIVANDRUM. 4. AJITHKUMAR P.T., KALLUVETTAMKUZHI VEEDU, HOUSE NO.11, T.C 2/185-1, MOSQUE LANE, KESAVADASAPURAM, TRIVANDRUM. 5. PURUSHOTHAMAKUMAR, T.C.172/2, HOUSE NO.27, MOSQUE LANE, KESAVADASAPURAM, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.R.S.KALKURA SRI.M.S.KALESH SRI.HARISH GOPINATH SRI.V.VINAY MENON SRI.M.AJAY (IRUMPANAM) RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL ADMINISTRATION. GOVT. OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE CITY CORPORATION OF TRIVANDRUM, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER, CITY CORPORATION OF TRIVANDRUM, CORPORATION BUILDING, PALAYAM, TRIVANDRUM. 3. TRIDA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, TRIDA, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.K.A.JALEEL, SC., TRIDA FOR R3 ADV.SRI.P.K.MANOJ KUMAR, SC, TVM CORP. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(c).No.12697 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 21st day of May, 2008 JUDGMENT Sri.P.K.Manoj Kumar, standing counsel for the second respondent Corporation seeks time to file statement. Sri.K.A.Jaleel, standing counsel for the third respondent submits that his client is only a formal party. Sri.Basanth Balaji,Government Pleader, who has taken notice on behalf of the first respondent submits that in view of Ext.P22 even the present writ petition has to be construed as a pre-mature one since the Government is yet to issue notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act. He further submits that having regard to the finality attained by Ext.P23, petitioners' challenge on Ext.P12 cannot be entertained since the Government was bound to issue Ext.P12 in view of Ext.P23 judgment. It is also brought to my notice that the petitioner has not chosen to implead the beneficiaries of Ext.P23 judgment as parties to this writ petition though avernments are seen made in the writ petition against them. I find merit in the above submissions of the Government Pleader and dispose of the writ WPC.No.12697/08 2 petition without granting reliefs. However it is made clear that this judgment will not foreclose remedies if any available to the petitioner in respect of Ext.P23. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE sv. WPC.No.12697/08 2