IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4773 of 2008 Crystal Lace Kamgar Union ...Petitioner V/s. M/s. Crystal Lace India Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.I.R.Kulkarni for the petitioner Mr.J.P.Cama, Sr. Counsel with Abhay Kulkarni for the respondents CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. 4th JULY, 2008 P.C. At the hearing of the petition, the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent states that (1) the Respondent has no intention to and shall not close down the manufacturing plant or sell the machinery (2) the Respondent is not discontinuing the canteen facility but shall only re-locate the canteen facility which is presently situated in a shed adjoining the plant to alternate premises within the plant without affecting the workers or the facility which is being extended; (3) the Respondent is intending to re-develop the adjoining plant where the canteen shed is presently situated without, in any manner, affecting the employment of the workmen or the continuation of the manufacturing plant and its ancillary facilities including the canteen. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the management stated that an undertaking in the aforesaid terms of the General Manager of the Respondent shall be filed before the Industrial Court within a period of one week from today. The statement is accepted. 2. On behalf of the Petitioners it has been stated that in view of the fair stand which has been adopted by the management, the workers on their part shall cease and desist from carrying out any obstructive activities. In view of the aforesaid statement, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner states that the grievance of the Petitioner is duly met. The petition is on the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, accordingly disposed off as withdrawn. ......