IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-3349 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 08.08.2011 Sarla Rani & another ... Petitioners versus Hari Ram ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present: Mr. J.S.Cooner, Advocate for the petitioners. **** Ajai Lamba, J. (Oral) The wife and the daughter have approached this court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for modification of the order dated 05.07.2010 (Annexure P-1) passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Ambala whereby revision petition filed by respondent-husband has been partly allowed. Revision petition filed by the petitioners has been dismissed. In brief the controversy is that the Chief Judicial Magistrate Ambala City while recording the fact that petitioner No.1 – Sarla Rani is earning Rs.3,000/- held her entitled to maintenance @ Rs.500/- per month from the husband. So far as petitioner No.2 – daughter is concerned, Rs.2500/- per month as maintenance has been awarded after enhancement under Section 127 Cr.P.C. Both the sides carried revision. Revisional Court vide order dated 05.07.2010 (Annexure P-1) has directed that the payment of maintenance would be payable from the date of passing of the order, after recording a finding that the husband is not responsible for delaying the proceedings. The revision petition filed by the petitioners has been dismissed on the ground that petitioner No.1 is earning. CRM No.M-3349 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Additional fact taken into account is that Hari Ram has an old ailing mother, who is also to be maintained and he has to spend @ Rs.1,000/- per month on his mother. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, no cause for interference has been shown. The present petition stands dismissed. August 08, 2011 (Ajai Lamba) sonia Judge