1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.184/2009. Brahmanand. VS C.J.(Jr.Div.), Kathumar, Alwar & Ors. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.184/2009. Brahmanand. VERSUS Civil Judge (Jr.Div.), Kathumar, Alwar and Others. 20.05.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Peush Nag, for the petitioner. Mr.Aatish Jain ] Mr.R.M.S.Panwar ] for the respondents. ***** Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 02.12.2008 by which the amendment which was sought by the plaintiff-petitioner was refused. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order. The amendment which has been sought is only with regard to a clerical error or mis-description of the place of office of the respondent i.e. whether it should be Laxmangarh, as mentioned in the plaint or Kherli, as sought to be amended. It is not in dispute that the office has now shifted to Kherli which has the jurisdiction over the land in dispute. 2 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.184/2009. Brahmanand. VS C.J.(Jr.Div.), Kathumar, Alwar & Ors. In the facts and circumstances, therefore, I am inclined to accept this writ petition and allow the aforesaid amendment. The petitioner had earlier also moved an application for amendment of the plaint and at the time of filing the application, the petitioner ought to have been more careful. The present application has now been moved which, as per the learned counsel for the respondent, is only filed for delaying the trial which is fixed for final arguments. In the facts and circumstances, the writ petition is allowed on payment of cost of Rs.2,000/- to the respondent. The learned trial court would decide the suit expeditiously. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.