IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8266 of 2009 1. HARSH INDUSTRIAL TRAINING CENTRE (I.T.C.) behind C.R.P.F. Head quarter Road No. -24, Rajiv Nagar, Patna through its Secretary Madhu Devi 2. K.B., I.T.C. At & P.O. Barhuli Mahania, District Kaimur through its Secretary, Shakuntala Devi 3. Sarvodaya I.T.C., Station Road Jamui through its Secretary Kiran Bharti 4. Girija I.T.C. Bailey Road, Patna through its Secretary, Amrendra Kumar Singh, son of Girija Nandan Singh 5. Arbind I.T.C., Bhabhua, Kaimur, Bihar through its Secretary Birendra Kumar Singh Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA through its Secretary Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi 2. Director General of Employment and Training, Shram Shakti, Bhawan, Rafi Marge, Government of India, New Delhi 3. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Labour Resource Department, Government of Bihar 4. The Director, Employment and Training, Bihar, Patna ----------- For the Petitioners : M/s Rajendra Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate & Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advoate For the State :Mr. Satish Narain Singh, A.C. to G.A.3 For the Union of India :Mr. S.N. Pathak, Advocate 02/ 20.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the Union of India. 2. Petitioner- institution was recommended by the State Government under letter No. 32 dated 6.1.2009, Annexure- 2 to this application for grant of recognition for the Session 2008-10 beginning from August by the Director, Employment and Training, Bihar, Patna and in consideration of such recommendation, the petitioner- institution has been allowed recognition with effect from February, 2009. Others namely, Gautam Budh I.T.C. At & P.O. Kerai Par Sarai, District Nalanda, which institution was also recommended under the same self letter no. 32 dated 6.1.2009, Annexure-2 to this 2 application along with 32 others, has been allowed recognition with effect from August, 2008. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is absolutely no distinction between the case of the petitioner- institution and Gautam Budh I.T.C. At & P.O. Kerai Par Sarai, District Nalanda and other institutions which have been allowed such recognition with effect from August, 2008. 4. Let the petitioner- institution represent before the Director, Employment and Training, Respondent no.2 along with a certified copy of this order, who should consider the same in accordance with law, as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt of the representation. In the event there is no distinction between the case of petitioner- institution and the said institution, namely, Gautam Budh I.T.C. At & P.O. Kerai Par Sarai, District Nalanda, then similar treatment be allowed to the petitioner- institution, which has been allowed to Gautam Budh I.T.C. At & P.O. Kerai Par Sarai, District Nalanda. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)