WP(C) 6757/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. A.R. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr . M.R. Pathak, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 3. As agreed to by the learned counsel for the appearing parties, t he case is taken up for disposal at the motion stage itself. The petitioner claims salary in the regular scale of pay with ef fect from 27th March, 2001 till 31st March, 2005 contending inter alia that she was appointed on the basis of the selection made on 27th March, 2001 on fixed pa y basis, though such selection was held for appointment of Assistant Teacher in the regular scale of pay. According to the petitioner, she earlier alongwith ot hers approach this Court in WP(C) No.2812/2006, which was disposed of directing the respondent authorities to consider the case of the petitioner for payment of salary in the regular scale of pay and thereafter, the authority has allowed th e petitioner to draw the salary in the regular scale of pay with effect from Apr il, 2005. It is also the contention of the petitioner that though she has been regularly selected and appointed on 27th March, 2001, the salary in the regular scale of pay from that date till 31st March, 2005 has not been paid. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the parties tha t the matter in issue has already been answered in Sudhendu Mohan Talukdar & Ors . -Vs- State of Assam & Ors. reported in 2006 (2) GLT 216 and as such, the prese nt petition be disposed of with a direction to the concerned Committee to consid er the case of the petitioner and pass necessary order. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of in ter ms of the direction contained in the judgment and order passed in Sudhendu Mohan Talukdar (supra). The Committee shall scrutinize the claim of the petitioner a nd pass necessary order in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No cost.