1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 456 OF 2010 Gajanan Namdeo Telangare, Prisoner C. No. 1234, Amravati Central Prison, Amravati. ... PETITIONER VERSUS State of Maharashtra through The Superintendent, Central Prison, Amravati. ... RESPONDENT Shri R. R. Shrivastava (Appointed) Advocate for the petitioner. Shri D. B. Patel APP for respondent/State. ..... CORAM : A. H. JOSHI & A. R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 25, 2010. ORAL ORDER : Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. 2] Heard by consent. 2 3] Perused the affidavit of the State. 4] According to the petitioner as he is involved in the offence under Section 302 and has undergone imprisonment for 15 years, he deserves release and is wrongly catagorised. 5] It is seen from the affidavit that petitioner was convicted for offence under Section 302 as well for Section 392 of Indian Penal Code. Petitioner’s claim that he was convicted only under Section 302 Indian Penal Code is thus factually erroneous 6] In view of conviction under Section 302 and 392, the catagorization done by State is correct and does not call for any indulgence. 7] Rule is discharged. JUDGE JUDGE svk.