IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN Present HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3854 of 2009 Between: B. Mahalakshmi .. Petitioner AND The Catholic Syrian Bank Limited & 2 others .. Respondents The Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3854 of 2009 ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition, under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘C.P.C.’), is filed against the order, dated 26.03.2009, in E.A.No.350 of 2007 in E.P.No.26 of 2000 in O.S.No.63 of 1988, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem, whereunder and whereby, the petition filed by the first respondent herein/decree holder, under Sections 145 and 146 C.P.C., for permitting it to add the schedule property mentioned in as item No.4 in E.P.No.26 of 2000 in O.S.No.63 of 1988, was allowed. 2. The first respondent herein/decree holder filed an application in E.A.No.350 of 2007 in E.P.No.26 of 2000 in O.S.No.63 of 1988 for permitting it to add the schedule property as mentioned in Item No.4 of the E.P. Schedule. In stead of granting or denying the relief sought for, the trial Court passed the impugned order permitting the first respondent herein/decree holder to proceed against the personal properties of the judgment debtors. Therefore, the relief sought for by the first respondent herein/decree holder in that Executing Court is to permit it to add the schedule property mentioned in item No.4 in E.P.No.26 of 2000 in O.S.No.63 of 1988 is entirely different from the relief granted by the Executing Court which provides to proceed against the personal properties of the judgment debtors. Hence, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. 3. In the result, the impugned order, dated 26.03.2009, in E.A.No.350 of 2007 in E.P.No.26 of 2000 in O.S.No.63 of 1988, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem, is set aside and the matter is remanded to the trial Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law. 4. The Civil Revision Petition is allowed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ K.C.BHANU, J Date: 31st March, 2011 KL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3854 of 2009 Date: 31st March, 2011 KL