IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 5TH JUNE 2008 / 15TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 12550 of 2008(R) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SIGI, AGED 24, W/O SUDHEESH, INIKATTIL HOUSE, KARUVILASSERY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT., REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK OFFICE. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VADAMA VILLAGE OFFICE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY GOVT PLEADER SRI. I.V. PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 12550 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 5th June, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner seeks the following relief in this writ petition: “Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the fourth respondent to correct the entry in Ext. P5 and issue a fresh possession certificate classifying the property as paramba property, within such time as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice.” The petitioner's contention is that the classification of the property as “Nilam” in Ext. P5 is wrong since it is a dry land. I am of opinion that the 4th respondent cannot issue a possession certificate except in accordance with the description of the property in the revenue records, which appears to be as “Nilam” in the case here. If the petitioner has got a case that the classification of the property in the revenue records is wrong, her remedy lies in seeking appropriate reliefs for correcting the revenue records regarding the nature of the property. Therefore, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek her remedies in that direction, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/