abs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2195 OF 1991 Sandoz India Ltd. .. Plaintiff V/s Mrs. K. Sushila .. Defendant None for the plaintiff. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 16TH APRIL 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. : 1. The plaintiff and its advocate are absent. 2. The record discloses that the writ of summons was transmitted to the defendant on 7th January 1992 by the office of the Deputy Sheriff of Bombay. There is however no record of service of writ of summons on the defendant. 3. Though more than 18 years have passed since the date of institution of the suit, the plaintiff has not - 2 - taken appropriate steps for service of writ of summons on the defendant. The plaintiff and his advocate are also absent when called. In the circumstances, nothing further can be done in the matter. 4. The suit is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)