IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.975 of 2006 BIHAR STATE AGRI.MARKETING BOARD, PANT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA THORUGH THE LAW OFFICER, D.K. CHOUDHARY. Versus 1. THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, REGISONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAWAN, R-BLOCK, ROAD NO.6, BIHAR, PATNA THROUGH THE REGISONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER. 2. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSISONER, OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSISONER, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAWAN, R-BLOCK, ROAD NO.6, BIHAR PATNA. 3. THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSISONER, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAWAN, R-BLOCK, ROAD NO.6, BIHAR PATNA. 4. AREA ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, PATAN(CENTRAL), EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, REGISONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAWAN, R-BLOCK, ROAD NO.6, BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEHRU PLACE, 60 SKYLAND BUILDING, 7TH FLOOR, NEW DELHI-110019. For the petitioner : M/s Y.V. Giri, Sr. Adv., Rajiv Giri, Advocate. For the Provident Fund : Mr. R.S. Pradhan, Sr. Advocate. ----------- 04. 20.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Employees Provident Fund Organization, Bihar, Patna. Proceedings taken against the petitioner pursuant to notice dated 24.5.2005 under Section-7-A of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provision Act, 1952, Annexure-8 will be subject to the result of C.W.J.C. No.13725 of 2010. Until the said writ petition is allowed, no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner. With the observation aforesaid, the writ application is disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)