(Arising 6111; 0f crimiiiai Revisio‘ii N6.614/2009 } PETITIONER : Pfashant’ Parakh 8/0 Shri S.C. Parakh, Aged about 35 years, R/c; " Near State Bank of India Balod, District Burg (C.G.) yERSUs RESPONDENT ’: Subhash Choudhajy Sfo‘ Ajit Cho‘udh’ary R/c Near Old Past Office, Budhwari Bazar, Balod, Police Station Balod, District Burg (C.G.} APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 4 HE CODE 8 W _T OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FOR RESTOI‘ég‘IONNQE THE CRIMINAL REVISION NO 614/{59 ORDER PASSED BY JUSTICE SHRI PRITINKER DIWAKAR ON Q4 [02/2010 IN¥WHICH THE LEARNED LLUDGE_ OE REVISIONAL COURT DISMISSED THE REVISION FOR WANT OF PROSEFI ITION f am W r Q{M'Q. W mm J H u w wwmwmm‘wm M‘ié £1= W m mmmm W#m??f'&1%€rm éa‘afaqaném SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER 15.02.2010 Shn' Jltgndra Gupta, coul Heaxd on admission. Counsel for the petitione was called he could not appeaJ other Court in some matter am Was inadvertent and if the Grin nits on'ginal number, the applic For the reasons mentione in the application the same is allowed . Accordingly, Cr.M.P. No. 6/20 10 is allowed and Cr.Rev. No. 614/ 20é9 is mstored to its Jm'ginal number. Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge [sel for the petitioner. r submits that when the case ~ as he was held up before the 1. non-appearance on his behalf linal l Revision is not Iestomd to t will suffer an irreparable loss. ‘