IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25244 of 2010 URMILA DEVI, W/o Ranjit Ram. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 26.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The instant case was instituted when the dead body of an unknown man was recovered which during investigation was discovered to be that of one Pankaj Kumar. The further facts emerged that in fact Pankaj Kumar was having affair with the present petitioner and the petitioner’s husband hired the service of one Ramakant to get him killed. The petitioner is said to be given a statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. purely exculpatory in nature to the effect stated above. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named who is in custody since 09.07.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional 2 Sessions Judge-I, Danapur in connection with S.Tr. No. 601 of 2010 arising out of Bihita P.S. Case No. 176 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)