IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2100/2011 SMT. RAJANI MAHESH SAHARE ..VS.. STATE OF MAH AND ANOR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.N. Patil advocate for petitioner Mrs. Deshmukh Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no.1 Shri Puranik, adv for R-2 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & P.B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : AUGUST, 08 2011. Shri Puranik, the learned counsel for the respondent no.2 states that the respondent no.2 has not rejected the application filed by the petitioner for grant of appointment on compassionate ground. According to the learned counsel for the respondent no.2 Corporation two lists were prepared and the petitioner was placed at serial no.5 in the second list. These two lists were later on combined and a single list was prepared in which the petitioner stands at serial no.23 in the list of eligible candidates. The learned counsel for the respondent no.2 by referring to the reply filed by the respondent no.2 states that the petitioner would be appointed on compassionate ground as per her turn. In view of the statement made on behalf of the respondent no.2, it appears to us that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. The respondent no.2 should appoint the petitioner on compassionate ground as per her turn. The writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE SMP