IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2010 / 18TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 21401 of 2010(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- NEEMA SUDHAKAR, 27 YEARS, D/O.SUDHAKARAN MASTER, LPSA KUNDILPARAMBU M.L.P.SCHOOL, ARAKKAL THENMALA VENGARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.PULIKKOOL ABUBACKER SRI.M.SAJJAD SRI.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-I. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-14. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 676611. 4. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VENGARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 676611. 5. CORPORATE MANAGER, KUNDILPARAMBU M.L.P.SCHOOL, ARAKKAL THENMALA VENGARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 676611. 6. SARANYA M.NAIR, LPSA, KUNDILPARAMBU M.L.P.SCHOOL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 676611. 7. DEEPAK K.P., LPSA, KUNDILPARAMBU M.L.P.SCHOOL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 676611. 8. SHAMEER LPSA, PULLITHARA MLP SCHOOL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 676609. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. DILIP MOHAN FOR R1 TO R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 21401 OF 2010 -------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner was working as LPSA in Kundilparambu M.L.P School in Malappuram District with effect from 15.7.2006. However, the said appointment has not been approved so far. Against the vacancy that has arisen subsequently, the fifth respondent Manager has appointed respondents 6 to 8. The contention of the petitioner is that taking into account the fact that her appointment as per Ext.1 with effect from 15.7.2006 was not approved, the Manager ought to have shifted the lien of the petitioner against one of the vacancies arisen subsequent to her appointment before appointing respondents 6 to 8. Raising such claims and contentions, the petitioner has approached the fourth respondent by filing Ext.P3. Since Ext.P3 is still pending before the fourth respondent, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions raised by the petitioner in this writ petition, it is disposed of with a direction to the fourth respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment with notice to the petitioner and respondents 5 to 8. The entitlement of the petitioner to claim salary will depend upon the outcome of Ext.P3. C.T.RAVIKUMAR (JUDGE) vps WPC No. 2 WPC No. 3