IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.GI W.P. (S) N0. ^ S8T~ /2006 PETITIONER : r V ^•^y-^ ^::^^;';^--"' ^8^.^-"' 1*^6'.-••" RESPONDENTS 1. / Hiraman Singh Bhandari Aged about 43 Years, S/o Late Shri Kunwar Singh Bhandari, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Girls Primary School, Armurkasa, Tahsil Balod Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^y-.-C'.lM&^ ,!»<- fS'^ ^t°"' 3. The Director Public Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Durg District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 CONSTITUIONOF INDIA OF THE t' ^P@9tsa-u\>sfo6. HI6H COURT OF CHHATnSSARH AT BILASPUR W. PXS) No. 6887/2006 Petitioner : Hiniman Singh Bhondari Versus Respondents ; State of ChhattiS9<ir+i & o-thers SB; Hon'ble AAr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Mr. B.L. Dembra, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panet lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on this 13th day of December, 2006) The foltowing order of the Court is passed by Satish K. i.J. 1. Learned counsel cppearing for the petitioner as wetl as leamed &eputy 6ovt. Advocate appearing for -the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts of the present case are similar to that of in W. P. No. 4725/2006 (Amar Sai Ram <& others Vs. State of Chhatt-isgarh & others), which was dispo%d of vide order dated 1.9.2006 (Annexure F^ P/2). They further submit that the question of !aw involved is atso •the ^ same. 2. In view of the above stated submissions made by lecrned counsel for the parties +his petition is diqsosed of in. terms of the order dated l.9.2006 passed by this Court in VV.P. No. 4725/2006. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishKAgmhotri Judge &Ah<ish