|[C—78 3Tr^?^T^?^ 7i^i W^T'^^1^ 3^5T ^|<41<4^, ^>Tfl-M<l<S, i®S01'y(4,< ^rmw ^w«h ^...U^O^..^.^M I 3TS^?T •'TO^? ('^?^<^) '^rw^lww^T PETITIONER: DEFENDANT -Versu RESPONDENT: PLAINTIFF 0/Vrit Petition under Artj^ Sinale Bench: Hori 22-1-2008:- Smt. Savita Tiwari, counsell Heard. The petitioner has preferr^d Constitution of India questioningl dated 2-11-2007 passed by appjication filed by the petjtjonei) whereby learned District Judge| petitioner herein. Brief facts (eading to filin^ question was purchased in th^ ^»^Sd4irf^P?^f^\fe^ ^fa^K ^•^fw^^r Ghanshyam Kasare @ Dhansai, aged about 25 years, son of Late Sukhramji Kasare, R/o Near Ram Tatkies, Deewanpara, Ward No.22, Rajnandgaon, Tah. And Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Smt. Bebi Shashi Kasre, aged about 29 years, wife of Dhan Sai Ghanshyam Kasare, Occupation house wife, R/o Deewanpara, Ward No.22, Present address - Mamta Nagar, Ward No.17, Rajnandgaon, Tahsil and Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ;le 227 of the Constitution of India) 'ble Mr. Justice L.C. Bhadoo for the petitioner. this writ petition under Article 227 of the the legality and correctness of the order District Judge, Rajnandgaon, on an herein under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC has rejected the application filed by the the of this writ petition arethat the house in name of the respondent herein. The 3^T -<MI^I(^'4, ^>Tfl^41(g, {si<r!)iy^< ©, 'WRW ^NS<*a" ^ 3^[^T^^ 'ff^T 3?!^? W^^ Ban/e an^r T^KSR C^f^^: i^iTW ^rfi^ 3^fr respondent herein has executed petitioner herein (husband of the some dispute started between civil suit No.13-A/2006 in the relief that it be dedared that power of attomey in favour of t^ taken by the petitioner herein, be incompetent, illegal and basel application under Order 39 Rule respondent herein (wife of the sale or gift or transfer by any been rejected. Admittedly, the property registered through registered sal file any proof to establish convenience lies in his favour to him. Therefore, learned DJstrict by the petitioner herein for not committed any illegality or| jurisdictional error in passing the| able to make out a case for inteil Constitution of India. |n the result, the petition fcj and it is hereby dismissed. ^l^feNNjIIH^f ^\fe^ T^R^R "^'^twaili^? ja general power of attorney in favour of the i-espondent). It appears that after some time tl|se two, therefore, respondent herein filed a Coi|rt of District Judge, Rajnandgaon for seeking respjondent herein had not executed any general t^e petitioner herein & further that any steps b^sed on that, general power of attorney shall l^ss. In that suit, the petitioner herein filed an & 2 and Section 151 CPC with a prayer that |ietitioner) be restrained from executing any othjer mode the property in question, which has |is in the name of respondent which was l^ deed. The petitioner has not been able to facie case or the fact that balance of ^how that the property in question belongs to |udge has rightly rejected the application filed injunction. Learned District Judge has infirmity and has also not committed any impugned order. The petitioner has not been ference of this Court under Article 227 of the fcjeing devoid of merit, is liable to be dismissed priipa templorary Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge