1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Civil Revision Application No. 22 of 2008 [S.P. Gandhi & ors. Vs. P.P. Gandhi & another] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. P.N. Mehta, Advocate for the petitioners. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 27th March,2008. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioners moved an application for a Certificate of Heirship under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827. 3. The petitioners, however, are seen to have represented something more than what they could have asked for, and hence incorporated following text as prayer in addition to what was permissible in law, namely:- “7) The applicants pray :- .....and issue certificate of heirship [in the form contained in Appendix B] in favour of applicant No.1 for transferring Gurunanak Saw Mill Puna Toli, Gondiya, ....” 2 4. The Trial Court rejected the application which order is confirmed by the First Appellate Court. The order does not suffer from any illegality. 5. Admittedly, it is a case of testamentary succession and hence the application under Bombay Regulation-VIII of 1827 had inherent limitations. 6. In the circumstances, no interference is called for. Civil Revision Application is, therefore, dismissed. Judge |Hedau|