^? ^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OE' CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W^P-JSLNo.^ _ffSS3_ QF2010, PETITIONERS / ,^v ^. ^> . ^/.-y^ .n//A4^ \'/'.?^\y ^ z'^^ ^7^'^ -^ ^ :1. Anil.Kun-larJoshi, S/o. late Shri P. S. Joshi, agedabouf 57 years, He.ad Master, Govt. Middle School Baruka, Block—Gariyaband, District Raipur (C. G.) 2. Ashok Kumar Sharma, S/a. late Shri Devi Prasad Sharma, aged about 54 years, HeadMaster, Govt. Middle ' School Tavren.ga, Block - Chhura,DistrictRaipur(C.G.) 3, Vishram Singtl Dau, S/o. late SKri Keju Ram Dau, aged about 56 years, Head Master, Govt. Middle School ; ; Vijay Nagar, Block- ; Gariyabarid, District Raipur ;(C-.G-).1:';:..//:..: .'1' ^ 4. Vishram SmghSahu, S/d.lateShrL^-Harl.aREi.in^d Sahi.i, aged about 54 |years, Head Master, Govt. Middle [ School Kxitena, .BIock - ; , Ghhura, pistl-itet Raipur (C. Q^ VBRSUS ^ RESPONDENTS -^. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Tribal Welfare DepaTtinent D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Departmenta, Raipur, District Raipur (C. G.) ^3. Block Education Officer, Gariyaband, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) ^-4. Block Education Officer, Chhura, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) ^ 5. Treasury Officer, Treasuiy Account and Pension, Raipur, District Raipur (C. G.) WRIT PETinQItUNDER^RTIGLEJQeOF^mE CONSTTTUnONOF'INDIA .TK^ npt.iti£tner.ls—-t3ja£n(ar1gHri^Tp -lTacr ITI aubrtirL^as. ^Sf "41<41<')AI, ®ti1<H'IS,fadl'yy ...W:...6...c^.l....i~^.:...^'s/^ *11*1CTI y,^jch- "'•—••• •••^ ^QO 3^1 'c[5Ri' (^3^?) sn^iqnf^ih? ^W 3H^?T !h*l TOiiw^riCTsn^i SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICB PBlITINKBR DIWAKBR 21.10.2010 coudsel tyis Shri Soinkaat Venna, Shri Praveen Das, Dy. G.A) Counsel for the petitioner^ inay be pennitted to wifhdraw representation before responden^ petitioners, their case is squarey by tbis Court on 3.4.06 (AEin.ex^i: P/4). State-eounsel submits is not in a position to niake petitioners wffl niake any such be decided after scrutiniziag the Accorduigly, the petitioner^ petition with fhe liberty as competent authorily to decid|e petitioners tfinade, iu accoidaacJE It is niade clear fhat thi^ opinion on raerits of fhe case| would be at Uberty to decide with law. <M<i[d'lilTt 'RTO^ ^* 'f^slr '-Cf^R^R ^;3i)OT3iii5i for fh.e petitioaers. for fhe State. submits fhat at this stage he petition with Uberty to niake N0.2 becausc according to the covered with the order passed P/3) and 6.2.09 (Anaexure .exiu-e fhajtwifhout verifying fhe facts he ^ny statement however, if tlie ^•epresentation the same would' (acts ofthe case. 'ner^ are penmtted to withdraw fhe afofesaid. It is expected froni the the representation of fhe wifh law. Court has not expressed any and the aufhority concemed tli^ representation ia accordance Sd/- . " pritinkerDiwakar Judge