SLE BE! G^-. m THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P. (S) N0. r^~° G^ /2010 PETITIONER / .> *. ....•''-^/^:^N%^-""" ^-^ *^.^ RESPONDENTS /": Naveen Kumar Satpathi, S/o. Shri Ghanshyam Satpathi Aged about 44 years, Resident of- Near Hari Bhoomi Office, Naya Ganj, Samleshwari Mandir Road, Purana Badpara, Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS /l] State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, School Education, Department/ Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipiir (CG) -2] Mission Director, State Project Office, Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Chhattisgarh Raipur, District Raipur (CG) ^- 3] Collector & District Mission Director, Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission (Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan), Raigarh, District- Raigarh (CG) 4] Chief Executive Officer & District Project Director, Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission (Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan), Raigarh, District- Raigarh (CG) District Project Goordinator, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission (Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan), Raigarh, District- Raigarh (CG) WRLTPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOFINDIA 1] PARTICULARS OF THE PETF III -s^ ^w\^, onlwis. [««ni«iy Sf^! 1^3R -t^-) HWVII (hHlch -ci<!-ticjl/6o 'dT, 2< fN^^T' 3nt?r^i h-V'h 3D^?I sftTRi^) ^Tft?T ati^r ^^IRR ^ritti SB : HON'BLBMR. JUSTICE PRITmtER DFWAK&R 03.12.2010 Shri Manoj Paranjape, counsel Smt. Smita Ghai, P.L. for the ^>r the petitioner. Stbte. Shri Paranjape submits that th| would be.served if direction is issu4d deciding the pending representation o^ dated 29.10.2010. According to th^ appointed as Accountant for one yea^ continued till 2008 aa his appointmen|l He further submits that Ns appointm^nt June 2008 because of some advej representation of the petitioner it was so made were not called for. State counsel submits that representation on 29.10.2010 and he has rushed to this Court and he the competent authority to considjei petitioner. She however submits representation of the petitioner is accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is resp. No.3 to decide the pending repref 29.10.2010 (Annexure P/15) if alreadjr two months from the communication It is made clear that this Couri) on inerits of the case and the authoritbr to decide the representation strictly in| purpose bf filing this petition to the respondent N0.3 for the petitioner (Annexure P/15) petitioner, he was initially in the year 1997 however, he jt was extended tiine and again. could not be extended after •se remarks bowever on tbe Found that the adverse remarks ^i|*ft^i<i1i +ii+icif'^ fs^ <I<i^i< ^Taipgqaii^i the petitioner has made a waiting for sufficient time i|-ight to have given sometime to l|er the representation of the she has no objection if the {lecided by the resp. No.3 in witlhout Otl thA distosed of with a direction td the sentation of the petitioner dated )r not decided within a period of (|>f this order. has not expressed any opinion concemed would be at liberty laccordance with law. .^^" y^^ ^\. llt,.