1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.95 OF 2006 Mr Dnyandeo Tukaram Pawar, .. Petitioner Vs The State of Maharashtra, .. Respondent Mr A.B.Tanjare i/b Mr P.B.Shaligram & Ashok B Tatane, for the petitioner. Mr S.R.Shinde, APP for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 27th JUNE, 2006 DATED : 27th JUNE, 2006 DATED : 27th JUNE, 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the respondent. 2. This is an application seeking condonation of more than six years’ delay in filing criminal revision application against the order of conviction passed by the Courts below ,convicting him under section 279 and 304-A of IPC. He was sentenced to suffer RI for six months and to pay fine of Rs.1500/-. It is not clear whether he has suffered the sentence so far. He has not made any statement to that effect in the application. The only explanation offered by him is in paragraph 4 of the application. He has stated that he was under impression that the appeal was pending and in the month of April 2006 when he visited the Court to enquire about the matter he came to know that 2 2 2 it was dismissed in 1996. The explanation given by the applicant is absolutely insufficient. He has not explained why did he not make similar enquiry during 1996 and April 2006. In the circumstances, the application seeking condonation of delay is rejected. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)