-t A-21 % 20,04.2010 Present: Mr. Manmeet Singh Main!, Advocate for the applicant/Plaintiff with Plaintiff in person. Ms. Maldeep Sidhu for Harjyot Kaur, counsel for the Defendant No. 9. Mr. J.C. Mahindru, counsel for remaining contesting Defendants. + I.P.A. No,22/2007 * Heard. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, IPA 22/2007 is allowed and disposed of. Registry is directed to assign new suit number to this petition. C.S. (OS) No. . (to be numbered) , I.A. No. 1419/2009 (u/s 340 Cr. P.C.). l.A, No, 4936/2010 (023 R 3 CPC) In this suit for partition, a settlement has been arrived at between the parties through Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre, leading to filing of l.A. No. 4936/2010 under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. This application is signed by both the sides and their respective counsel and is accompanied by affidavits of the parties and copy of the Settlement Agreement of 26*^ March 2010 is .placed on record. I.P.A.No. Page 1 'i\ Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Mr. Mahindru, counsel for contesting Respondents and Ms. Maldeep SIndhu, Advocate for Defendant No. 9 pray that a preliminary decree in terms of Settlement Agreement of 26^^ March 2010 be passed. In the light of the aforesaid, a preliminary decree of partition of the suit property In terms of the Settlement Agreement of 26^"^ March 2010 {Ex.C-1), arrived at between the parties, be prepared. This suit and pending applications are disposed of by passing a preliminary decree In this case. 'Gaur, J. April 20, 2010 ArU- I'l - i-rc. I.P.A. No. Page 2 I $—6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 2346/2010 & I.A. Nos.250/2013 & 13555/2013 TARVINDER PAL SINGH Plaintiff Through None. versus AMARJEET SINGH AND OTHERS Defendants Through Mr.A.S. Maini in pereon. Mr. J.C. Mahindroo, Adv. for D-2 &6. i Ms.Maldeep Sidhu, Adv. for D-8. L Mr.Amarjeet, Adv. for D-10-13. + EX.P. 255/2013 & E.A. (OS) No.254/2014 TARVINDER PAL SINGH Decree Holder Through None. versus AMARJEETSINGHAND OTHERS JudgementDebtors Through Mr.A.S.Maini in person. Mr. J.C. Mahindroo, Adv. for JD-2 &6. Ms.Maldeep Sidhu, Adv. for JD-7. Mr.Amarjeet, Adv. for JD-10-13. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH ORDER % 29.09.2014 The plaintiff filed the suit for partition, possession and permanent injunctionagainst the defendants. A preliminarydecree was passed in the matter. The execution is also filed by the plaintiff. When the matter is taken up second time, no one appears on behalfof the plaintifB'decree holder. Ihavebeeninformedby the learnedcounselappearingon behalfof thedefendantsthatthepartieshavesettledtheirdisputesbetweentheparties. As amatteroffact, theyhave also producedthe sale deedwhichshowsthat the suit propertyhas been sold. Copy ofthe sale deed is taken on record. Sinceno one appearson behalfofthe plaintiffdecreeholder,thesuitas well as executionpetitionare dismissedin viewofsettlementarrivedat between the parties. However, liberty is granted to the plaintiff, under these . circumstances,to movean applicationforclarification,ifany. ^ Pendingapplicationsarealsodisposedof. ck y 9 SEPTEMBER29,2014/jk lOHANSINGH a I