1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Contempt Petition No. 221 OF 2009 in Writ Petition No. 5101 of 2009 (D) (Milind Nivrutti Meshram ..vs.. Abhishek Krushna, C.E.O., Z.P., Gondia) =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. S.G.Jagtap, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A.Y.Kapgate, Advocate for Respondent C ORAM : Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota, J. DATED : 18th February, 2010. The petitioner filed this Contempt Petition alleging that the respondent has willfully violated the order dated 3rd December, 2009 and seeks his committal for contempt. By the said order, Writ Petition No. 5101 of 2009 had been disposed of with statement made by the learned counsel for respondent that “as and when occasion and situation arise, the procedure stipulated in the circular issued by the Government of Maharashtra, dated 02nd January, 2009 will be undertaken by the Zilla Parishad, provided there is no other impediment in doing so.” The petitioner contends in the petition that the circular dated 2nd January, 2009, mentioned in the order, being in consonance with all the previous judgments and orders, there can be no impediment in implementing it. It is, however, alleged that despite the statement being made, the respondent has not been implementing the circular. 2 In the affidavit in reply to the contempt petition, the respondent states that process stipulated in the circular was required to be put on hold because of pendency of Contempt Petition No. 89 of 2009. With the withdrawal of the said contempt petition, there can be no impediment in implementation of the circular dated 2nd January, 2009. The learned counsel for the respondent, by way of precaution submits that the circular is to be put into service only as and when occasion and situation arises and that the respondent would be implementing the circular as and when the situation and occasion arises i.e. as per the requirement. In view of this, the contempt petition is disposed of without any orders. No order as to costs. JUDGE. Diwale