IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9438 of 2010 1. MANORAMA DEVI 2. Balmiki Mandal Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 21.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. No doubt, main allegation is leveled against the petitioner no.2 only but incident is of the year 2003. Their absconding is explained by their remaining in Punjab for livelihood can be taken as alibi also but no such material is found in course of investigation. So, finding the petitioners’ absconder only is based for refusal of their anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioners is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)