IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13358 of 2011 RABINDRA CHOUPAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Special Case No. CC 308 of 2002 registered under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act. It is alleged against the petitioner that the petitioner was cutting forest trees alongwith one Vidyanand Risideo. Vidyanand Risideo named the petitioner as person fled away from the scene of occurrence. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was not apprehended from the place of occurrence and Vidyanand Risideo on whose statement the name of the petitioner sprang up was also not apprehended and till date the petitioner has not received any summon from the court below that can be a good ground for release of the petitioner on regular bail. Let the learned court below consider 2 the regular bail application of the petitioner and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned court below at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)