IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.10521 of 2008 Between: S.Althaf Hussain ..... Petitioner AND 1.The Municipal Corporation of Kadapa, rep. by its Commissioner and 2 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri B.Devenand Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Palle Nageswara Rao The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents in not issuing site allotment order in favour of the Petitioner for undertaking construction of Public Toilet on Build own operate and Transfer basis though the Petitioner happened to be the successful bidder in pursuance of the notification issued in Proceedings Roc.No. 5330.2004/E1, dated 2-6- 2006 as highly, illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution of India.” At the hearing, Sri B.Devanand, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause of the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.13753 of 2008, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 7th July, 2011 lur