W.P(C) No.13479/2009 Page 1 of 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Writ Petition (Civil) No.13479/2009 % Date of Decision: 18.12. 2009 UOI …. Petitioner Through Mr.H.K.Gangwani, Advocate Versus All India Defence Civilian Clerks Association …. Respondent Through Nemo. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI 1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? YES 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NO ANIL KUMAR, J. * The Tribunal has followed the decision of its another Bench at Madras. The writ petition filed against the decision in the Madras High Court has been dismissed and even the special leave petition filed against the decision of Madras High Court has been dismissed. There are no grounds to interfere with the decision of the Tribunal which has been passed relying on the decision of the Madras W.P(C) No.13479/2009 Page 2 of 2 Bench of the Tribunal which has been affirmed by the Supreme Court. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. ANIL KUMAR, J. December 18, 2009 VIPIN SANGHI, J. ‘ss’