WA 150/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR R S GARG HON’BLE MR JUSTICE H BARUAH (R S GARG, CJ) Heard Shri N Dhar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri VM Thomas , learned standing counsel for Education Department. The appellant being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 29.1.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge rejecting the claim of the appellant in regar d to her salary has come to this Court with the submission that the petitioner w as appointed on ad hoc basis by the competent officer but salary has not been pa id to her. This Court on an earlier occasion granted a direction in favour of the a ppellant directing the respondents that her case be considered. Thereafter, appo intment order dated 30.3.2001 was issued which reads as The Hon’ble Guwahati Hi gh Court in its order directed to authority to appoint the candidate as Asstt. T eacher in any L.P. School. The order dated 5.6.95 is on record, a perusal of the said order would s how that the High Court simply directed the Deputy Inspector of Schools, Karimga nj, to consider the case of the appellant but never issued any direction for app ointment of the appellant. The order of appointment is contrary to the rule and misreading the order passed by this Court. Though the Deputy Inspector of School s, Karimganj, appointed the appellant but the appellant could not acquire any ri ght because the order of appointment is based on misreading of the order of the High Court. The learned Single Judge was completely justified in dismissing the writ petition. In future, if the petitioner has to apply for the post of teacher and in case, relaxation is not given, she would be entitled to approach appropriate fo rum / officer by filing appropriate application.