Cp 7^^ Z IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) IZQ9 72007 PETITIONER ..» /•*'.". lu. ^' ^fr' -^' ^c^-^^-~'... ..-s^'" ,^- ^^y-^' ^. '• f^y ^^,'a' Umrao Singh Chandravanshi S/o. Shri Genduram ^ Chandravanshi, aged about 44 years, Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School Narayangarh, Block-Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) RESPONDENTS ^' .G^ »<;'o^' ^^!^^ ^ ^^s :-^.^.' ~- .-^"".^ ;"?T-.:.,""'^:;:^ t^'t.Ci -•ti ^"^ '"•^ ''y ^K,^ ;:; •'•' " ¥'•. /y <»'<-,y» te^l «l\ '^ 'Y- ^^ ^ ^^^syy :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^2. District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Block - Dongargarh District-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS rri r-t-i? ^"^Tii: @L ATBIi <'BLE MR. SATISH K. -/ WMT PET1TION (S) No. 1339of20<)7. petrtioner Umrao Singh Chandravanshi Versus State ofChhattisgarh & Ofhers. Present; Shri Goutam iChetrapal, Adyocate for the petitioner. Miss Deepali Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State/Tespondents. (Passed on 9m ofMai-ch, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitioner submits tbat the petitioner is working as Assistant Teacher. The petitioner B.T.I. Examination certificate in the vear 1992, on his own expenses. 2, Leamed c.ounsel appearing for tlie petitioner submits that the question involved, herein asto whether the teacher, who obtaiaed B.'l ,1, K.xammation certiticate on his own exoenses, ss to two advance increments. 3. AccordiB.s to ieamed counse! for the petitioner. the petitioner i.s entitled to two advance increments in view ofthe decision ofthis Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mimicipal Corporati.on, Durg and anofher {2006 (II) MPJR- -•7- CG 96}. This Court in the case ofYashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa.l Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B, Ed. /B.T.I. Examination Certificate on their own expenses, are covered by the cireular dated 24.12.98 issued by the State GovemmeBt of Leam.ed counsel for the petitioner farther submits fhat the facts and question of law involved in the present case are squarsly covered bv decision of this Court ia the case of Yashwanl Kumar Bharadwai Vs. Munidpa] Corooration, Durg and ther (Supra), to which learfied counse1 appearing for the resDondeBts fairlv concedes and aarees with the averment made bv leamed coimsel appearing for the petitioner. 5, Accordinalv. the writ oetition is allowed in terms of the order nassed in the case of amar Bharadwai Vs. (Supia~). subiect to v~ "i- -^/ verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.T.I. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the c.ircuiars dated 24.12.1998 & 1 .3.1999 and farther whether he has been pa.id two advaace increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihntri Judge Amit