IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.13735 of 2008 BETWEEN Chappidi Sambasivudu. ... PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Superintendent of Police, Kadapa District and four others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. V.R. REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: ORDER: Petitioner submits that earlier he filed a suit against the respondents 3 to 5 herein and obtained a decree of declaration of tile and also perpetual injunction. During the subsistence of the said injunction, when the respondents 3 to 5 interfered with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of his lands, the petitioner filed a private complaint before the learned Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Pulivendula and the said complaint was referred to the second respondent. The second respondent – Station House Officer, Vempalli Police Station, registered the same on 01.10.2003 as Cr.No.58 of 2003 for the offence under Sections 447 and 392 read with 156(3) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that no investigation has been conducted by the second respondent in Cr.No.58 of 2003 and he has not filed any report before the learned Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Pulivendula. 3. Under those circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the second respondent is directed to complete the investigation in Cr.No.58 of 2003, if not already completed, and file a final report before the learned Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Pulivendula, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two (2) months from today. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________ C.V. RAMULU, J October 19, 2010 DSK