IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.229 of 2009 Sachchida Nand Gupta, Son of late Baijnath Prasad, resident of village-Sakri Gali, P.O.-Guljarbagh, P.S.-Alamganj, Patna-7, District-Patna. ………….Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Secretary, Secondary, Primary & Adult Education, Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Patna. 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Patna. 5. The Deputy Superintendent of Education, Office of District Superintendent of Education, Patna. 6. The Area Education Officer, Barh, P.S.-Barh, District-Patna. 7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Pandarakh, P.S.-Pandarakh, District-Patna. 8. The Area Education Officer, Bankipor, Patna. 9. The In-Charge Head Master, Middle School, Baruane, P.O.-Baruane, P.S.- Sakshora, District-Patna. ………..Respondents………Opp. parties. ----------- 3/ 13.01.2010 This application has been filed for review of order dated 12.08.2009 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 9240 of 2009. By this order the counsel for the petitioner was permitted to withdraw this application and the writ application was dismissed as withdrawn. In the review application it is submitted by the petitioner that subsequent to withdrawal of the writ application he found out some relevant documents in support of his claim. Suspension order had been passed based upon charges not connected with the petitioner. As subsequently, the petitioner could get some orders in support of this fact. I do not find that this can be a ground for review of the order. However, the petitioner has liberty to renew his prayer by filing another writ application. This review application is dismissed. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)