IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1635 of 2009 RAMESH PASWAN,SON OF SRI NAGAINA PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHESARAHIYA P.S. MAHUA, DISTRICT VAISHALI---PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 5. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MAHUA VAISHALI 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MAHUA, VAISHALI 7. THE MUKHIYA PANCHAYAT RAJ SINGHARAT MAHUA, VAISHALI 8. THE SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ SINGHARAT, MAHUA, VAISHALI---RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 2.2.2009 According to the petitioner’s own showing, he has represented before Respondent No.4, the District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur for the redressal of his grievance. Having heard Mr. Satish Kumar Sinha, for the petitioner, Assistant Counsel to Government Advocate No.VII, for the State and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it expedient that respondent no.4 aforesaid takes decision on the representation of the petitioner, if already not taken, within four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. I direct accordingly It is made clear that I have not expressed any opinion in regard to the claim made by the petitioner and that shall be decided by respondent no.4 in accordance with law. In order to facilitate early decision, petitioner alongwith a copy of this order shall annex the application filed earlier. Application stands disposed off with the observation - 2 - aforesaid. (Chandramauli Kr.Prasad, ACJ.) A.Kumar