IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 718 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- TALUKA DEVELOPMENT OFFICER Versus PUSHPABEN KANUBHAI KHANDHERIYATHRO'P.O.A. -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Civil Revision Application No. 718 of 1999 MR PV HATHI for Petitioner No. 1-2 MR HM PARIKH for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR Date of decision: 26/02/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Learned advocate Mr Hathi for the applicant states that the dispute between the parties is amicably settled and for that purpose he has placed on record a copy of the writing executed by the respondent - original plaintiff. The said writing is produced by Mr Hathi on record. Mr Hathi states that now in that view of the matter nothing further is required to be done. Civil Revision Application stands disposed of as having become infructuous as the settlment is arrived at between the parties. Interim relief, if any, is vacated. Rule is discharged. Liberty to revive Civil Revision Application in case of difficulty. ( P.B. Majmudar, J. ) *mohd