IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10374 of 2011 BHIM KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and Mr. T. Sharma, learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 11.02.2011 in a case registered under Sections 366A and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner and others is of enticing away the minor daughter of the complainant. Initially complaint was filed which ultimately got registered as police case. It appears that in 164 Cr. P.C. statement the victim has stated that she left her house of her own since angry with the parents and thereafter stayed with an old couple at Delhi for whom she worked and then returned home. In 164 Cr. P. C. statement there is no accusation against the petitioner. The other accused Nagina Yadav with similar accusation has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 23887 of 2 2010. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Hilsa at Nalanda in connection with Ekangar Sarai P. S. Case No. 23 of 2010. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)