WP(C) 4543/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. N. Dhar, learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner by the present petition has challenged the order dated 25th March , 2011 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court in FC (Crl.) Case No. 381/2008 and also the notice dated 25th April, 2011 issued in the said proceedin g by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court in the aforesaid proceeding. A fu rther prayer has also been made to enquire into the functioning of the learned P rincipal Judge, Family Court at Guwahati, as, according to the petitioner, the p roceeding in the aforesaid case has been conducted without adhering to the proce dure established by law. It appears that the petitioner challenging the aforesaid order as well as the af oresaid notice filed Criminal Revision Petition No.209/2011, which has not been entertained by this Court and the Court has refused to set aside the said order as well as the notice. That being the position, the petitioner cannot, by a subs equent writ petition filed, challenge the said order as well as the notice, as s ought to be done in the present writ petition. Relating to the second prayer, it is the contention of the petitioner that the a foresaid proceeding has not been conducted by adhering to the procedure establis hed by law. If the petitioner is aggrieved by any order that may be passed witho ut following the due process of law, it is always open to him to challenge the s ame before the appropriate forum, for the that purpose, no enquiry is required t o be constituted to enquire into the functioning of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court at Guwahati. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. No costs.