2N THE HIGH C9133}? OF JUDICATWE AT BILA$PUR (C‘.G.) wRlT PETEEIeN No.» 933'é3 /2003/¢ PETEIGN§R§ : l) Hemant $en, aged abcut 34 year$ S/Q Sitaram Sen, waterman, Gavti Aytrcved Hospital, Village Chatwu'a Black & Tahsil Arang, bistrict .. Raipur (ac-:3 ‘ ( a ‘ < < < < \ ( x x ‘ ( ( x a t . '.~ \ 2) Sonchand bahu, aged abaut 36:79am ‘ 3/0 $anc’osh Sahu, waterman. Govt. Ayurved Hospital, Village Chanc‘ikhuri Block 6c Tahsil - Ar'ang Distt. Raipur (C.G.} 3) Narayan Ya§av, aged dog-m; 343268;” S/D Mahtu Yadav. E‘é'aterman, Gcv’c. Ayurvea Ho$pifcal Village Tenduwa, Block & Tahail Dharsinwa, Diat‘c. Raipur(c.s.) u ( \ Naresh Kumar Verma, aged 42 ygarsg $/O Bhune shwar Verma, \ véatermarl, Govt. Aymvec‘i Hospital Village - AkOli ( Maniihar ) Block & Tahsil .. Dharsinwa f Disizrigjt». Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Conté. . .2 / : M; § n ne O N u u m “g .:.,, .y .‘ RES POND ENTS St' a*’r.e of Chh a’ctkgarh’v Thrcugh : Secretary Ministry of Public Hearah Department, D .K.S . Bh’awan Raipua: (C .G .) 2) Chief Executive Qfficely‘ Janpad Panchayat, Dharsinwa D istr ic’l: Raipur (C .G.) ‘ Ch ief Exe cutive O£fice£ Janpad Panchaya'b Arang D istr ict fRai‘pur (C .G J @113 PEEITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 22_6/’227_ a? THE iwawwmmuwmm H _ mm“ fc 5% HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHEATTISGARH: BILA$PUR Single Bench: Hon’ble shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W. Pu Na“ 2763 OF 2003 Paitimlersé : I-IEMANT SEN «S5 OTHERS V€rsus RespondentS : STATE OF CHHATTISGARH £5 ORS u; Mi r, Shn‘ Hemant Gupta, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Pankaj Slnivagtava, panel lawyer for State/respondent No. 1. Shn' Rajesh Pandey, counsel for respondents N0. 2 and 3, GRAL ORQER (17th Febxuaxyg £006) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners statea: that the petitioner No.1 was; appointed as Waterman, in Govt. Ayurved Hospifal, Viuage Chattera Block and Tahsil Arang. District Raipur, petitioner Ne.2 wae appoinied as Waterman, in Govt Ayurved Hospital, Viiiage Chandkhuri, Block & Tahsi! Arang, District Raipur, petitioner No.3 was appointed as Waterman in Govt. Ayurved Hospitat, Viiiage Tenduwa, Block and Tehsil Dharsinwa, District Raipur and,.the petitioner No.4 was appointed as Waterman in Gevt. Ayyrved Hospital, Viltage Akoli (Mandhar) Block and Tahsil Dharsinwa, District Raipur. 2. Awarding to the petitioners, said Ayurved Hospitals have been taken over by the Government and the petitioners were also absorbed in the Government services. The petitioners were not granted the pay Scale which was payable to the Watermen in the Department of State Government. The petitioner has f!!ed this petition praying as under: "That, the respondents may be directed to consider the saiary of the petitioners as per sanctioned and prescribed by the, government." Learned ceunsei appearing for the respondents have no objection, if the prayer as stated above is granted. Accordingly the petition is allewed and the respondents are directed te consider the case of the petitioners in accerdance with taw, for grant ef salary. No order as te costs. é!— wsfxu Awmom S stage r i i (J1