IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS THURSDAY, THE 18TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 29TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 3677 of 2010(H) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- M.MUHAMMED ASIF, S/O.MUHAMMED SALI, PROPRIETOR, M/S.F.R.TRADERS, THOONGMAPARA, KANDALA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER SMT. M JAYASREE RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTAKKADA CIRCLE, KATTAKKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MARANALLOOR POLICE STATION, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. KRISHNANKUTTY, CONVENER, HEAD LOAD WORKERS UNION (CITU), KANDALA P.O., KANDALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. SOMAN, CONVENER, HEAD LOAD WORKERS UNION (INTUC), KANDALA P.O., KANDALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY G.P., SRI. T K VIPINDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT. P1: TRUE COPY OF THE LICENSE NO. 95/09 ISSUED BY THE MARANALLOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT DATED 7.12.2009 EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE NO. MRNR - 126 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 11.2.2010 EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 13.1.2010 EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 15.1.2010. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 3677 of 2010 H - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 18th day of February, 2010 JUDGMENT Joseph, J. This writ petition is filed seeking police protection for doing loading and unloading work in the petitioner's shop by his attached workers. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. Though the party respondent is served, there is no appearance. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner presses before us the second prayer, i.e. to direct the third respondent to process and take a decision on the application for registration submitted by the attached workers of the petitioners within a time limit. W.P.(C).No. 3677 of 2010 2 4. This Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of directing the third respondent to consider the application for registration submitted by the attached workers of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date on which a copy of this judgment is produced before him. (K. M. JOSEPH) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) Judge tm