IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 17640 of 2008 Between: Kommineni Seshaiah S/o. Venkateswarlu Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Guntur, Guntur District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Narasaraopet Guntur District. 3 The Tahasildar, Narasaraopet Mandal, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in communicating the final orders passed if any in pursuance of the show cause notice dt. 25-1-2007 issued by the 3rd respondent to the petitioner and in proposing to evict him from the subject matter of the land admeasuring Ac 0.46 cents in Sy.No. 730/4 of Yellamanda Village , Narasaraopet Mandal, Guntur District and in proposisng to assign the same to third parties is contrary to law, arbitrary, and against the principles of natural justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.VENKATESWARLU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 17640 of 2008 Oral order: The petitioner has questioned the show cause notice dated 09.03.2007, issued by the 3rd respondent, namely the Tahsildar, Narsaraopet Mandal, Guntur District, as illegal and arbitrary. This Court while admitting the writ petition granted status quo order on 13.08.2008. After this order, it is submitted by the learned counsel that the petitioner has filed appeal before the 2nd respondent, namely the Revenue Divisional Officer, Narsaraopet, Guntur District, questioning the show cause notice, issued by the 3rd respondent, namely the Tahsildar, Narsaraopet Mandal, Guntur District, which is impugned in this writ petition. The appeal preferred by the petitioner, is said to be still pending, and in view of this, both the counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, agreed to the disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: The 2nd respondent, namely the Revenue Divisional Officer, Narsaraopet, Guntur District, is directed to consider and dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law. Till the disposal of the appeal, status quo order granted by this Court on 13.08.2008, shall continue. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 24th March, 2009 KSR