IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc M-6393 of 2009 Date of decision: 16.3.2009. Sarabjit Singh @ Laddi …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …Respondent Present: Mr Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr PS Sidhu, Addl AG Punjab. S.S.SARON, J. Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in a case registered against him for the offences under Section 323/324/325/34 IPC. In the FIR that has been registered, no specific role has been attributed to the petitioner. The petitioner remained absent from trial from 11.4.2007 onwards. He was declared a PO on 9.6.2007. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, a compromise had been effected between the petitioner and the complainant. The complainant had assured the petitioner that he had no grievance against him. However, the complainant later did not appear and make a statement with regard to the compromise. It is submitted that the petitioner being idle had gone abroad to earn his livelihood. It is on his return that he found that the case is still pending trial. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner is willing to join the trial of the case, it would be just and expedient to grant him the concession of anticipatory bail. Cr Misc M-6393 of 2009 2 This is more so for the reason that in the FIR, no specific role has been attributed to him. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the direction that the petitioner shall put in appearance before the trial Court within 10 days from today. However, in the event of his arrest, he shall be admitted to interim bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The petitioner shall also file an undertaking that he shall not absent himself from the trial of the case except with the prior permission of the Court. He shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the Court. He shall surrender his Passport before the trial Court. 16.3.2009 ( S.S.SARON ) ASR Judge