IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2647 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 06, 2010 Anju Joshi …Petitioner Versus Vikramjit and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Nilesh Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 20.02.2010 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Karnal, whereby rejecting the application moved by the defendant – petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. CR No.2647 of 2010 Nutshell, plaintiff filed a suit for declaration declaring that the sale deeds dated 18.03.2008 and 18.02.2008 executed by Swarani Devi are illegal, unlawful, void and ab-initio. In the suit, defendant moved an application under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. saying plaintiff failed to pay court fee on the sale consideration of the sale deed, hence, plaint is liable to be rejected. Learned Trial Court in the impugned order has held that plaintiff was not a party to the sale deed and he was not bound by the acts of third party, hence, he is not supposed to pay ad-valorem court fee on the sale consideration / market value of the property. Vide judgment dated 03.05.2010 passed in Civil Revision No.22 of 2009, the Division Bench of this Court has held that if plaintiff is not a party to the sale deed under challenge, he is not supposed to pay court fee on the sale consideration or the market value of the property. In view of the judgment dated 03.05.2010 passed by this Court in C.R. No. 22 of 2009, present petition does not survive and is liable to be dismissed. Disposed of accordingly. September 6, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2