IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.777 OF 2010 B.S.Rana .....Petitioner VERSUS Bank of India, Mumbai and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. V. Ramswaroop, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. N. Lohan, Advocate, for respondent Nos.1 to 4. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is having an equally, if not, more effective and efficacious remedy of filing an appeal. The petitioner has very fairly disclosed that he has a remedy of appeal, which he has not exercised as the same is not efficacious and speedy. I am not inclined to accept this submission. Right of appeal is a equally efficacious remedy and rather is more speedier in nature. The petitioner may invoke the same before approaching this Court through this writ petition. The petitioner is relegated to his alternative remedy of filing appeal. Dismissed. January 21,2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE