HIGH COURT G? CHHATT3$GARH : E§L§SPU% {Wi‘ii petition under Ar‘dcle 226 of ihe Constituiien of india) Prsent :- Shri KN Nancie, counsei for the petitioney. e Shn Ajay Dwivedi, 'Pane! Lawyer for the State/respondents on advance copy. , ORAL ORDER M715 we‘vepkm onn-r} u‘: r "my: , nvv: $un§§ Kumar Sinha. J. Heard on a‘dmrssron. The peritroner, who §s working on the east cf Assisian‘r Proiect Gfficer in Ekikrit Bar Vikas Pariyojana, Chandrameda. has been transr‘erred from Chandrameda to Baikuntnpur, on administrative grounds, vide order dated 28—1 O-2GO7 (Annexure-Pl’l). Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that son of the petitioner is etudying in 5‘“ ctaes and he has to appear in Board examinations, He aiso argues that the wife of the petitioner is working as Lecturer in Wadrafnagar‘ Therefore, it the transfer order is effected, it snati adverseiv affect the X i ,// Koetitioner and his famiiv members. i \ Writ Peiition (S) No. 6$?$ 0% 239‘? Petitiomr: MK. Khaikho Slo Shi’i Late Prabhucharan khaikho, aged about 40' years, Occupation Chiid Deveicpment Proj$ct Officer, Ekikrit Bai Vikas PaYiycjana, at Chandrameda (Bhaiyatham. Distt‘ Surgu§a (CG). ‘v’ersus \ M. Resnondents : 1‘ State of C.GA, Throuah Secretarv‘ Department 0f Womz}. and Chiid Weir‘are and Sociai Weifafe. D.K.S. Mantra!aya, Raipur (cm. D§rector, Debartment of Woman and Chiid Wgi‘f re, Mamivaiaya, Raépur {8(3). 3. Coi§ectm. $urguja, Dismct Surguja ’CG K . 4. Disirict Program Officer, Denartment of Woman and Child Welfare, Dismct Surguja (CG). é? ,2, On being gaintediy asked fram learned caunsei foa' the petitioner that Sime when the oetitioner is working at Chandrarneda, he submits that the Detitioner is wefkina there since iast more than five veaw. These are not the mounds for a Court cf !aw to interfere with the wansfer of the empiovee. The transfer is an incident o? service. Nobody working an a transferabie post can ciaim for his post'mg at a particuiar piece. Who ehowd be posted where is to be seen by the empioyer which depends upon the admimstrative exiuencv as aEso pubiic $nterest. Uniess ine order ef trensrer is shown t0 be vitieted bv ma!a§ides, extraneous considereiions 0r is shewn i0 be nessed aaainst any statutoni ruie or the Act: the same cannot be interfered with by a Court of iaws is the sewed View of me Apex Ccurt. Learned ccunsei for the petitioner courd not noinr oat any such greund of melande or of extranecus censideratron or the? the oreer has been paesed aaainst any statutory rute or the Act. i do not find any reason to interfere with the order of transfer of the oetitioner on this grounds The petition is dismissed at the motion stage itsetf. Consequentiy, t.A.No.1, appttoation for act-interim writ atso stands disoosed oft Sdl— Gown i i i i Sunil Kumar Sina Judge h