1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2462 OF 2005 Mejan Prasad Dhaneshwar Gupta .. Petitioner Vs. The Chief Executive Officer, S.R.A. and Ors. .. Respondents Mr. M.P. Vashi for Petitioenr. Mr. Abhijeet Wagh i/by G.D. Utangale for R. No. 1. Mr. D.S. Sakhalkar for R.No. 5. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: OCTOBER 12, 2006 DATED: OCTOBER 12, 2006 DATED: OCTOBER 12, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The Petition as field is premature. On behalf of the Respondent No. 1 the learned counsel makes a statement that no annexure II has been issued nor the scheme has been sanctioned. In the light of that question of entertaining this petition does not arise. If S.R.A. scheme is sanctioned and name of the Petitioner is not included in Annexure II, it will be open to the Petitioner to take out such proceedigs to which he is entitled to in law. With the above observations, Petition disposed of. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)