IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3816 of 2011 LEELA PODDAR, W/O LATE NAGENDRA NATH PODDAR, RESIDENT OF NEW PROFESSOR’S COLONY, PATEL NAGAR, P.O.-T.N.B. COLLEGE, BHAGALPUR, P.S. TATARPUR, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION,BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, TILKAMANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY,BHAGALPUR. 3. TILKAMANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR. 4. THE AUDITOR, TILKAMANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 5. THE AUDITOR, FOR THE STATE OF BIHAR, POSTED AT TILKAMANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 1.3.2011. Heard Shri Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.2 to 5/Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University and Shri Vikas Kumar, learned A.C. to learned Advocate General appearing on behalf of the respondent no.1/State. The petitioner’s husband died on 18.4.2009, while functioning as Assistant Registrar in Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University. It has been prayed by the petitioner to direct the respondents to make payment of death-cum-retiral dues of her husband in view of U.G.C. (revised) pay scale and further for direction to pay (a) Arrear of difference amount of pension of 2 the post of Assistant Registrar, (b) Arrear amount of gratuity, (c) Arrear of Group Insurance Scheme amount, (d) Arrear amount of Leave Encashment, (e) Arrear amount of 50% merger of D.A. (f) Arrear of difference amount of salary as per U.G.C. Scale (revised pay scale) with admitted interest. It was submitted that petitioner has also filed representation before the respondent no.2. However, till date, no decision has been taken. With the consent of parties, the writ petition is being disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.2/Vice Chancellor, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University is directed to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing all the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. In case of refusal, respondent no.2 is directed to pass a speaking order within aforesaid time. 3 With aforesaid observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)