IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39430 of 2009 NAIMUDDIN son of late Sk. Panchu, resident of village Patani Narayanpur, P.S. Manihari, District Katihar… … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … …OPPOSITE PARTY For the Petitioner: M/s P.K. Jaipuriar and Anshuman Jaipuriar, Advocates For the S t a t e : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 2 17.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the first information report and he has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused. The petitioner has not been put on Test Identification Parade, though he was remanded in this case on 20.05.2009. Chargesheet has already been submitted in this case. It is submitted by learned counsel for the State that the petitioner along with co-accused Ramesh Sada was arrested with looted articles at Dalkola and for that Karandighi (Dalkola) Police Station Case No. 94/09 has been lodged. The articles were seized and the same have 2 been identified by the informant, which is apparent from the case diary. The petitioner is also involved in many other criminal cases, about eight in number, of similar nature. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner along with other co-accused Ramesh Sada had been apprehended along with the looted articles, which were subsequently identified by the informant and is having criminal history also, I am not inclined to grant bail to this petitioner. This application is, accordingly, dismissed for the present. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)