BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Seventeenth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14584 of 2011 1 E.GANESAN 2 A.VELU 3 B.SIVA SAILAM 4 B.DURAI @ ARUNACHALAM ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 to 4 Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AALVARKURICHI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.286/11) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. H.ARUMUGAM Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 4 in Cr.No.286 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. Apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioners are before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of the prosecution, the petitioners attacked the de facto complainant and also criminally intimidated him. The de facto complainant sustained only simple injury and after treatment, he has been now discharged. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would deny the above allegations. According to him, due to previous motive, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. 4. I have considered the above submissions. 5. Having regard to the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambasamudram, on each executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required. Th petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. sd/- 17/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AMBASAMUDRAM 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AALVARKURICHI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. H.ARUMUGAM Advocate SR.No.40082 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14584 of 2011 Date :17/11/2011 SMA/22.11.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/