IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 20TH JUNE 2011 / 30TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 16375 of 2011(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- BIJITH JOSEPH,S/O.JOSEPH.P.K,AGED 22 YEARS,STUDENT,PUTHENPURACKAL HOUSE,PANANGAD, KOCHI-682506. BY ADV. SRI.K.A.MANZOOR ALI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY(CUSAT)REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS,THRIKKAKARA.P.O,KOCHI-22. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS,THRIKKAKARA.P.O,KOCHI-22. ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI,SC,COCHI U FOR R1,2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.16375/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE CHELLAN RECEIPT DT 16.5.2011. EXT.P1(a): TRUE COPY OF THE CHELLAN RECEIPT DT 16.5.2011. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 16375 OF 2011 (V) ===================== Dated this the 20th day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result was declared, he had failed in the one paper viz., “Distributed Computing” of VIIth semester. He applied for scrutiny and revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the scrutiny and revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the scrutiny of the answer paper within two weeks and the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for scrutiny and revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp