1 WP-8583.11.sxw lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8583 OF 2011 Shri Tukaram Govind Bangar : Petitioner versus Shri Ahilu Govind Bangar and ors. : Respondents. Mr. Sachin Pawar for the Petitioner. CORAM : R M SAVANT, J. DATE : 30th November 2011 P.C. 1 The above Petition takes exception to the order dated 25/3/2011 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ghodegaon by which order the Application-Exhibit 89 filed by the Petitioner who is the original Defendant in Regular Civil Suit No.192 of 2006 came to be rejected. The said Application was filed by the Petitioner/Defendant for taking objection to the valuation of the suit in question filed by the Respondent No.1 who is the original Plaintiff for partition of his 1/10th share in the suit property and for its possession. 2 It was the case of the Petitioner/Defendant in the said Application that the suit has been undervalued, considering the valuation of the property in respect of which the Plaintiff was seeking his 1/10th share in the suit property. At the time of adjudication of the said Application, the Plaintiff had set out the calculation, on the basis of which he has valued the suit which calculation has been reflected in Para 6 of the impugned order. On such calculation, the trial 2 WP-8583.11.sxw Court was of the view that the no fault could be found with the valuation of the suit, and therefore, the said Court would have jurisdiction. It is required to be noted that the Defendant was seeking to value the suit in terms of the valuation of the suit property as in the year 2011 which the trial Court found to be not acceptable as the value of the suit property would have to be taken as in the year 2006 when the suit was filed. 3 In my view, no fault can be found with the impugned order passed by the trial Court. No case for interdiction is therefore made out. The above Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. [R.M.SAVANT, J]