IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.25668 of 2008 Between: A.R. Sujatha W/o. Babaiah R/o. 4-2-790, Ramkote, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1The Collector, R.R. District Lakdi-ka-Pool, Hyderabad. 2The Joint Collector, R.R. District Lakdi-Ka-Pool, Hyderabad. 3The Revenue Divisional Officer Western Division, Attapur, R.R. District. 4The Mandal Revenue Officer Shamshabad, R.R. District. 5Konda Kistaiah S/o. Late Yellaiah R/o. Ottapally Village, Shamshabad Mandal, R.R. District. 6Konda Vittalaiah S/o. Late Balraj R/o. Ottapally Village, Shamshabad Mandal, R.R. District. 7Konda Narsimha S/o. Late Balraj R/o. Ottapally Village, Shamshabad Mandal, R.R. District. 8Konda Krishnaiah S/o. Late Balraj R/o. Ottapally Village, Shamshabad Mandal, R.R. District. 9Konda Balaiah S/o. Late Balraj R/o. Ottapally Village, Shamshabad Mandal, R.R. District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to pass an order or orders one in the nature of writ of Mandamus by declaring the inaction of the respondent No.4 for Non Compliance of the Orders of the Joint Collector in File No. D5/3893/2004 dt. 1-9-2006 inspite of filing of Memo by the petitioner before the MRO on 18-12-2007 in respect of land in Sy.No. 29/AU total admeasuring 10 acres situated at Ottapally Village, Shamshabad Mandal, R.R. District and declare the same as totally illegal, arbitrary against the principles of natural justice pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SURESH SHIV SAGAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.25668 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner’s father Bojjam Narsimlu was the owner of the land admeasuring Acs.10.00 in survey No.29/AU situated at Ootpally Village in Shamshabad Mandal in Ranga Reddy District. After his death, petitioner applied for succession. By proceedings dated 21.01.1987 the fourth respondent allowed the application and granted succession. Thereafter, the petitioner came to know that the fourth respondent passed orders for issuance of pattadar pass books to respondent Nos.5 to 9. The petitioner preferred an appeal before the third respondent, who allowed the same on 22.03.2001. Respondent Nos.5 to 9 filed a revision petition before the Joint Collector, who disposed of the same remitting the matter to the fourth respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that though the Joint Collector disposed of the matter on 01.09.2006 remitting the matter to the fourth respondent, the matter has not been disposed of and kept pending. Therefore, a direction is sought to the fourth respondent to dispose of the matter. At the stage of admission itself, after getting instructions, learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the Mandal Revenue Officer is seized of the matter and appropriate orders would be passed shortly. In view of this, this Court is not inclined to admit the writ petition. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. No costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 24.11.2008 vs To 1 The Collector, R.R. District Lakdi-ka-Pool, Hyderabad. 2 The Joint Collector, R.R. District Lakdi-Ka-Pool, Hyderabad. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer Western Division, Attapur, R.R. District. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer Shamshabad, R.R. District. 5 2CCs to G.P For Revenue, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 6 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}