IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51683 of 2008 1. SHASHI RANJAN 2. Ram Ekbal Rai 3. Ramashray Rai 4. Mishri Lal Prasad Yadav Versus 1. The STATE OF BIHAR 2. Upendra Ram ------ 5/ 04.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. From the complaint itself, it is clear that petitioner no.4 is not alleged for any Overt Act, while petitioners no. 1 to 3 have been alleged for abusing in the name of caste. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that it was not in public view but I do not convince with the submission so advanced by the learned counsel, as it was Darwaja of the petitioner no.1, witnesses are named in the complaint petition. If complaint was set up by the brother-in-law of the petitioner no.1, that can be made a ground for liberal view, the petition would have been maintainable. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners no. 1, 2 and 3 is rejected. Insofar as petitioner no.4 is concerned, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Complaint Case No. C200 of 2008, above named petitioner no.4 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri P.K. Sinha, J.M., East 2 Champaran Motihari subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. However, petitioners no. 1 to 3 are directed to surrender before the Court below and pray for regular bail. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)