IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CASE No.4159 of 2009 Md. Khurshid Versus Indradeo Ravidas & Ors. ---------------------------------- 06/ 03.08.2011 On 27.07.2011 learned counsel for the petitioner had stated that an interlocutory application for condoning the delay had been filed in C.R.No.1276 of 2009. On the basis of the said statement, office was directed to find out the said interlocutory application and place the same before this court. In compliance of the said order, the office has reported that no interlocutory application has been filed in the said civil revision. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This petition has been filed for restoration of C.R. No.1276 of 2009 which stood dismissed for default due to non- compliance of peremptory order of this court dated 05.08.2009. Considering the averments made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the statements made in the petition, it appears that genuine reasons have been shown which prevented the petitioner from complying the said order. In the said circumstances, this M.J.C. petition is allowed and C.R. No.1276 of 2009 is restored to its original file and number. However, this order will be subject to compliance of order dated 05.08.2009 by 08.08.2011. Harish (S.N. Hussain, J.)