IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1229 of 2009 Date of decision: 21.12.2010 Harbhajan Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus Tirath Singh and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. B.R. Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Thind, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 6, 8, 13 and 18. Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.7, 9 to 12 and 19. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondents fairly stated that he has no objection in allowing the present petition quashing the impugned order passed by learned Executing Court allowing the amendment application moved by the decree-holders and dismissing the application of the judgment-debtors objecting the executing of the decree. Present petition stands allowed. Impugned order stands quashed. Parties are directed to appear before the learned Executing Court on 20.1.2011. Learned Executing Court shall proceed with the execution in accordance with law and shall decide the execution after hearing both the parties. Concession made by the learned counsel for the respondents shall not come into the way of the respondents before the Executing Court. (Alok Singh) Judge December 21, 2010 R.S.