IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2014 of 2005 GAJENDRA CHOUDHAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 05. 15.03.2011 No body appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, counsel for the State is present. This application stood dismissed for non- prosecution by order dated 27.02.2006. Thereafter the same was restored. The matter was taken up on 14.02.2011 when the following order was passed: “Both sides present. In view of the deficient pleadings on record, this Court was inclined to reject the application as the petitioner has not been able to demonstrate by adequate pleadings that lands claimed by them were clubbed and acquired by reason of notification/orders passed in L.C. Case No. 339/1973-74. Petitioner has also not stated in the application with reference to documents about the right, title and interest in respect of the land claimed by him. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays two weeks time to file affidavit bringing on record relevant pleadings supported by documents. Let such affidavit be filed within three weeks failing which the application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. If the order is complied with, the case shall be listed after four weeks within top 15 matters.” Learned counsel for the State submits that no supplementary affidavit pursuant to the order dated 14.02.2011 has been filed. 2 It would appear from the order dated 14.02.2011 that this Court had observed that such affidavit be filed within three weeks, failing which the application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. In that view of the matter, no fresh order is required to be passed as the present application stood rejected for non-compliance of the order dated 14.02.2011. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )