IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4299 of 2011 MANOJ YADAV @ MANOJ KUMAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 10.2.2011 The petitioner is in custody since 15.9.2010 in relation to Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S.Case no. 198 of 2010 for an offence under Section 366A/34 IPC. The petitioner is alleged to have kidnapped the minor grand daughter of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that upon recovery, the statement of the victim girl was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., which is Annexure 2. In her statement, the girl has clearly stated that she is related to the petitioner. While going to school, she had agreed to go with the petitioner on his motor cycle. The petitioner ,later again, took her to Hazaribagh and then she was recovered by her mother. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that referring to the statement of the girl u/s 164 Cr.P.C. it is clear that the petitioner had not sexually harassed the girl in any manner or molest the girl. It is not disclosed as to how the mother of the victim girl came to know of the place where the girl was kept at Hazaribagh. The girl has medically examined, which shows no sign of any sexual involvement. Be that as it may, let above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Destrict- Gaya, in Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S.Case no. 198 of 2010, subject to the condition that one of the bailors must be the father of the petitioner. Singh ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)