IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 29TH AUGUST 2008 / 7TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 25879 of 2008(E) -------------------------- CMP.7275/2007 of C.J.M.,KOLLAM .................... PETITIONER: -------------- NAZASRUDEEEN, SHAN MANZIL, KADAPPA, MYNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.K.JAGADEESH SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENT: ---------------- STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, REPRESENTED'BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICE CUM CHIEF MANAGER, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM. BY SRI.SAJI VARGHESE, SC FOR BANK THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 25879 OF 2008 E ==================== Dated this the 29th day of August, 2008 J U D G M E N T This is the third round of litigation. 2. The prayer now made is to direct the respondent to accept the proposal made by the petitioner in Ext.P5 and release his title deeds as prayed for therein. Initially, the petitioner had filed WP(C) No.7635/08 challenging the proceedings initiated against him. That was disposed of by giving an opportunity to the petitioner to clear the liability. Having defaulted in doing so, petitioner again approached this court by filing W.P.(C) 22300/08. Taking the view that the petitioner cannot resort to piecemeal litigation, that writ petition was dismissed by Ext.P4 judgment. I am informed that a writ appeal filed by him also has been dismissed. It is thereafter that the petitioner has again filed this writ petition with the prayer referred to above. 3. In my view, in view of the two previous judgments already rendered by this court in the writ petitions filed by the petitioner, this writ petition is also liable to be dismissed. 4. At this stage, counsel for the Bank made an offer that if the WPC 25879/08 :2 : petitioner is willing pay the whole amount due to the Bank deducting Rs.4.5 lakhs, Bank is willing to accept payment and release the title deeds as prayed for in Ext.P5 and is also willing to give him three months time to pay the balance Rs.4.5 lakhs. This offer made by the Bank, in my view is a reasonable one. Counsel for the petitioner informs that the petitioner wants to avail of this offer made by the Bank, and if that be so, payment may be made on or before 5/9/2008, in which case, the documents referred to in Ext.P5 will be released by the Bank and he will also be given time for three months for paying the balance amount. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp