IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37189 of 2009 ANUP KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 2.12.2009 Heard. The court below appears allowing itself to be trapped by the petitioner by repeated petitions and thereby being forced to pass orders staying the warrant of arrest. In none of the orders which was passed by the court below on the application of the petitioner after the order passed on 24.6.2008, the court below has mentioned that the petitioner had made a statement before it that in the light of its direction to the father of the lady to allow the lady to go to the house of the petitioner, the petitioner had made any attempt to bring the lady back to his house. If the court below was as naïve as he appears making himself out then this court is not ready to accept it. It does not appear that its orders were put into the knowledge of the lady or her counsel or, also that she was required to appear before the court on any particular date or dates. The court below has illegally stayed the execution of the warrant of arrest without reasonable grounds. I do not find any merit in the petition because the conditions under which the earlier order was passed by me in Cr.Misc.No.3221 of 2008, do not appear fulfilled. The petition is dismissed. Let the petitioner surrender and pray for regular bail B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )