:1: :1: :1: srp. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4843 OF 2007. WRIT PETITION NO. 4843 OF 2007. WRIT PETITION NO. 4843 OF 2007. Santosh Shankar Pawar & others. ..Petitioners. V E R S U S The State of Maharashtra & Others. ..Respondents. --- Mr. V. V. Pai a/w Raj J. Khude for the petitioners. Mr. S. A. Kumbhakoni for the respondent-6. Mr. V. P. Malvankar A.G.P. for the State. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & D.G.KARNIK,JJ. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & D.G.KARNIK,JJ. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & D.G.KARNIK,JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 8, 2007. DATE : OCTOBER 8, 2007. DATE : OCTOBER 8, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. By this petition, the petitioners seek directions to the respondents to permit the petitioners to appear for the 1st year of D.Ed examination scheduled to be held in the month of October 2007 and also for a direction to issue and accept the examination forms duly filled in with the fees. 2. The petitioners had taken admission for the D.Ed. course in the respondent no.6 institution in the year 2003-04. The training facilities at the respondent no.6-institution were examined by the Government and it was found that the facilities were not adequate and the government requirements were not complied with. There was no practical training and no :2: :2: :2: demonstration (of teaching) and the government directions were also not complied. The Government, therefore, vide its letter dated 29th March 2005 refused to permit the students to appear for the examination to be held in April-2005. Thereafter the petitioners did nothing and have filed the present petition in the year 2007 praying that they may be permitted to appear for D.Ed. examination to be held in October 2007. 3. It has not been brought on record that the shortcomings in the training facilities were corrected by the respondent no.6 and the petitioners received the necessary training including practical experience in teaching. In fact we have doubt that this is a petition sponsored by the respondent no.6 itself. In any event as the petitioners have not undergone the training which is a requisite for the D.Ed. examination, they cannot be permitted to appear for the examination under the orders of this Court. Hence the petition is rejected summarily. (D.G.KARNIK, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (D.G.KARNIK, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (D.G.KARNIK, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)