-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT CONTEMPT CONTEMPT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.7 OF 2005 NO.7 OF 2005 NO.7 OF 2005 IN IN IN NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF OF OF MOTION NO.217 OF 2003 MOTION NO.217 OF 2003 MOTION NO.217 OF 2003 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO.892 NO.892 NO.892 OF 2001 OF 2001 OF 2001 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.589 NO.589 NO.589 OF 2000 OF 2000 OF 2000 Shahida Abdulkarim Nadiadwala ...Petitioner v/s Advance Network Technologies Ltd. and ors. ...Respondents Ms Neela A. Mahto for Petitioner. Mr H.R. Desai for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 24TH APRIL 2007. -2- P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for both the sides. Perused the order dated 3rd April 2007 as also the report dated 20th April 2007 submitted by the Court Receiver. Considering the amount deposited by the respondent No.1 and their letter authorising the Court Receiver to appropriate the amount of Rs.7,60,000/- which was to be refunded to them as per the consent terms, towards the dues payable by them to the petitioner and other respondents, now admittedly the entire amount has been paid by the respondent No.1 on the Court Receiver receiving the amount from State Bank of India. Therefore, no further orders are necessary in this contempt petition. It is disposed off. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. ---------------