IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.29678 -M of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : SEPTEMBER 28, 2011 PARUL & ANR. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. RK Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 This petition under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, seeks indulgence of this court on the ground that the petitioners got married against the choice of respondents No.4 and 5. The petitioners are, now, being threatened with dire consequences, as the marriage of the petitioners is not being accepted by respondents No.4 and 5. 2 Notice of motion. 3 On the asking of the Court, Shri Anupam Sharma, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. 4 At this stage, Shri Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.4 and 5. 5 Respondents No.4 and 5, as identified by their counsel Criminal Misc. No.29678 -M of 2011 (O&M) 2 Shri Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate, are also present in court and have been given an opportunity to talk to their daughter-Parul (petitioner No.1). 6 The stand of respondents No.4 and 5 is that Parul has relied on false, fabricated and forged documents to approach this court and cognizable offences have been committed. Respondents No.4 and 5 further state that they shall not cause any harm to the petitioners and shall not take law in their own hands. 7 In view of the stand of respondents No.4 and 5, this petition is disposed of, however, with liberty to the said respondents to avail of remedies, available to them, as per law. September 28, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?