y INTHE IUI.P. STATE ADIUIINISTRATIVET. ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. Applicants : VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS/ RESPONDENTS JLNAL AT RAIPUR rL/)of1998 t^T(7$-'-2^^Bl: Tirathfam Sahu ~—---~ Aged about 28 years S/o. Shri Jbadooram Sahu Resident of village Singhorikala Block Kurud, Tahsil Dhamtari Distt. Raipur (M.P.) (Ex-Mansevi Up Sahayak Shikchhak, previously appointed on due selection and eligibilities against the vacant posts of Asstt. Teachers under the Education Deptt. of Govt.of M.P.) (1) StateofM.P. Through S.ecretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) (2) Commissioner of Public Instructions, Govt. of M.R, Education Deptt., Directorate of Public Instructions, (DPI Office), Near Chetak Bridge, Bhopal (M.P.) (3) Deputy Director of Public Instructions Govt. of M.R, Education Deptt. Education Distt. Raipur, P.dArvind.NaaaLPendion Bada. Raipur(M.P.) (4) Block Education Officer Govt.ofM.R, Education Deptt. P.0. Kurud.Tah.Dhamtari, Distt. Raipur fM.P^ ^olication under section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act 1985 (No.13 of 1985) read with Articles 14^ 16. 21 & 311 ofthe Constitution of India. considered with Principlesof Natural and Social Justice. PARTICULARS OF APPLICATION f£ ' ' • 1 .Particulars ofApplicant : As in CauseTitle. 2. Particulars of Non - Applicant : As in Cause Title. 3. Particylars 6f the Orders aaainst which the aDDlication is made The Applicant is not aggrieved by any particular orders but is aggrieved by the action of the Non-Applicants/Respondents, in not considering the demand of Justice in the case of the Applicant, by reinstatement/ re-appointment and regularisation as Asstt. Teascher on the regular seale of pay and changing the Education Policies every now & then and violating the Mandatory Provisions of Articles 14, 16, 21 and 311 of the Constitution of India and also the Principles of Natural and Social Justice, Equity and Fair ...-„/^-^7?!i-,^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. 8ATISH K. AGNIHOTM. J. WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.2566 OF 2QOS Petitioner Tirathram Sahu versus Respondents StateofM.P.and others Present : Mr. Alok Nigam, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDER !& (Passed on 7m ofSeptember, 2006) It is submitted that the facts and question of law involved in the present petition are same to that of in Ram Sahay Jha vs. State ofMddhya Pradesh and others (Original Application No.15/1995). The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, by itsjudgment and order dated 16-2-1996, allowed the application of fhe petitioner therein. Leamed counsel for the petitioner seeks pennission of this Court to approach the respondents/State for consideration and disposal of the petitioner's .Add Gopal case in terms ofthe order dated 16-2-1996 passed in the case of Ram Sahcy Jha (Supra) by Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur. 2. Leamed counsel appearmg for fhe respondents/State fairly agrees with the submissions made by leamed couasel for the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation before the respondents - State Authonties for their decision on the representation in the light offhe order dated 16-2- 1996 passed in the case ofRam SahayJha (Supra), in accordance with law, on its own merit, vrithin reasonable time. 4. With the above-stated liberty, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per mles. ^•^" ^y^ .ii!li^!i'fS9;"'S'"3TT ^iULil.:',^i;'J:i,.:jJSi;::,^.si..-,;