IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5718 of 2010 1. Haidar Khan, Son of Late Abubakar Khan. 2. Md. Rizawan Khan, Son of Haidar Khan, both residents of Mohalla-Bari Dargah at P.S. and District-Nawada.....petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR....................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 31.03.2010. The present application has been filed on behalf of two petitioners, above-named, but the petitioner no.2, namely, Md. Rizawan Khan, has been arrested during pendency of the present application. Hence, his application has become infructuous, which is, accordingly, dismissed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 467, 468,420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. So far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned, the allegation is that he sold more than his share allotted in a partition suit. Petitioner no.1 happens to be the maternal uncle of the complainant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that it is a case of civil dispute and the petitioner no.1 is aged about 80 2 years old. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner no.1, namely, Haidar Khan is directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 361 of 2004 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)