IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6866 of 2010 1. ANANDI PRASAD, S/O LATE MOHAN MAHTO, R/O VILLAGE- BADSAHPUR,P.S.& DISTRICT-SHEIKHPURA--PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SHEIKHPURA. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, SHEIKHPURA. 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OFFICER, SHEIKHPURA. 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, ARIYARI, SHEIKHPURA. 7. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, AFANI IN ARIYAR BLOCK, SHEIKHPURA. 8. THE AFAINI PANCHAYAT MUKHIYA IN ARIYARI BLOCK, DISTRICT- SHEIKHPURA--------------------------RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 18.1.2011 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State, the Court is of the considered opinion that in absence of the necessary documents having been made available or in condition in which they were made available, it is not possible for the appellate authority to adjudicate on the claim of the petitioner. But in case the documents which are pending before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate in connection with the criminal case are made available, the case of the petitioner may be considered afresh on its own merit. This writ application is disposed of with the above observation. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)