1 mca76-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.76 OF 2010 Rutuja Mahesh Joshi .. Applicant V/s. Mahesh Suryakant Joshi .. Respondent ..... Mr. A. S. Patil for the applicant. ..... CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : APRIL 28, 2011. P.C.:- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant. In terms of order passed by this Court on 8th March, 2011, the Advocate for applicant has served notice to the Advocate for the respondent. The appearance of advocate for respondent has been shown on the cause list. None appears for the respondent. 2. The applicant is the wife of the respondent. The applicant is a resident of Yeola, District Nashik. The respondent is the resident of a village in Taluka Ratnagiri, District Ratnagiri. The respondent has filed a petition for divorce in the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division 2 mca76-10 at Ratnagiri. 3. In the application, it is set out that the applicant is jobless and is residing at Yeola, District Nashik alongwith her parents. It is stated that for attending to the Court at Ratnagiri, the applicant is required to undertake the travelling for a period of two days. It is stated that as her parents are not in a position to accompany her, it is impossible for her to undertake travelling up to Ratnagiri. 4. There is a reply filed by the respondent. I find from the reply that what is stated in paragraph No.6 of the application has not been specifically dealt with. Hence, a case is made out for passing an order of transfer. Accordingly, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). 5. After the transfer of the petition, the Civil Judge Senior Division, Niphad, Nashik shall issue notice to both the parties. JUDGE