C.M. No.2246 CII of 2008 and CR No.6640 of 2007 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.M. No.2246 CII of 2008 and CR No.6640 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: 4.2.2008 Netar Singh .....Petitioner Vs. Sarabjit Kaur and others ...Respondents .... CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA **** Present : Mr.Ashok Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Arvind Kashyap, Advocate for respondent no.3. ... RAJIVE BHALLA, J (Oral) CM No.2246 CII of 2008 C.M. is allowed. Documents annexures R-1 and R-2 are taken on record. C.R. No.6640 of 2007 After addressing arguments for some time, counsel for the petitioner states that subject to his rights, vis-a-vis Sarabjit Kaur, if he is impleaded as a party to the pending appeal, he would not claim any rights, beyond the rights, if any, available to Bant Kaur, on the date of the execution of the sale deed in his favour. He also states that the petitioner will not seek to file any written statement, claim any issue or pray for liberty, to lead any evidence in the appeal. He wants to be impleaded as a party, so as to ensure that the other parties to the appeal, do not collude. Counsel for the respondent no.3 has no objection. C.M. No.2246 CII of 2008 and CR No.6640 of 2007 (O&M) 2 In view of the aforementioned statement, the present revision petition is allowed and the petitioner is impleaded as a party/respondent in the appeal, pending before the Additional District Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib, in terms of the statement made by counsel for the petitioner. 4.2.2008 ( RAJIVE BHALLA ) GS JUDGE