_+ ^~\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR PETITIONERS: WritPetition (Art. 227) No.4491 of 2011 1. Smt. Chandrakanta Shukla W/o Rudranarayan Shukla, Shiv Chowk Ramsagarpara Dhamtari, Tahsil & Distt. Dhamtari (CG). 2. Smt. Savita Tiwari W/o Bhupendar Tiwari, Ramayan Samiti Brahmin Para Rajnandgaon, Tahsil & Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG). 3. Smt. Tilottama Chaturvedi W/o Pankaj Sharma Near Sheetala Mandir, Changorabhatha Raipur Tahsil & Distt. Bilaspur (CG). 4. Smt. Chandrakala Tiwari W/o Fekulal Tiwari Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham. 5. Smt. Meena Pandey W/o Ashok Pandey, Purani Basti, Loharpara, Jharsuguda (Orissa). 6. Smt. Manju Sharma W/o Rajendra Sharma Goswami, Near STD, New Changorbhatha, Raipur Tahsil & Distt. Raipur(CG). 7. Smt. Rashmi Dwivedi W/o Satyendra Kumar, Harimodel School Road, Near Nahar Ni&^m Pump House, Tiwari Chawl, Rajendra Nagar Chowk, Bilaspur, Tahsil & Distt. Bilaspur (CG). Appellants/defendants Versus RESPONDENTS: Godan Bhumi Raksha Samiti Ganiyari, Tahsil Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur Through President Jawahar Saheb S/o Ishwar Saheb Gupta Aged 45 years R/o Ganiyari, Tahsil Takhatpur Distt. Bilaspur (CG). Gajanan Dighraskar S/o Balkrishnarao alias Nana Saheb, R/o Ganiyari Tahsil Takhatpur Distt. Bilaspur, Member Godan Bhumi RakshaSamiti, Ganiyari Respondents/Plaintiffs Rajendra Kumar Tiwari S/o Late Gorelal Tiwari Aged about 55 years R/o Near .iii<l"JS!BB s"!^. 1!'6> ^ yi'S^1" Sirgitti Crossing Tarbahar, Bilaspur, Tahsil & Distt. Bilaspur (CG). 4. Manmohan Kaushik S/o Fekulal Kaushik Aged about 28 years, R/o Ganiyari Tahsil Takhatpur Distt. Bilaspur (CG). 5. Smt. Rajeshwari Tiwari W/o Purushottam Tiwari Near Jora Talab, Jorapara Sarkanda Bilaspur, Tahsil & Distt. Bilaspur(CG). 6. Keshav Dighraskar S/o late Babu Saheb, R/o Chantapara Bilaspur, Tahsil & Distt. Bilaspur (CG). 7. Tahsildar, Takhatpur Distt. Bilaspur 8. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Bilaspur (CG) {Writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India} Present: Mr. N. Naha Roy, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Sumit Jhanwar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents No.7 & 8. Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma. J ORALORDER (18-8-2011) 1. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged legality and propriety of'the order dated 4-4- 20T1 passed by the 4 Additional District Judge, Bilaspur in Misc. Civil Appeal.No.2/2011 affirming the order dated 30-11-2009 passed by the Civil Judge Class-11, Takhatpur in CivilSuitNo.184-A/2009, whereby the trial Court has granted injunction against the petitioners herein from alienation of the property. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused both the orders. 3. After considering the reyenue records filed on behalf of both the parties, the trial Court has granted temporary injunction only to the extent of alienation and has not passed any order relating to possession which has been affirmed by the appellate Court. While exercising the "Ksassasssssss.i.ayg! Cali&^ ..^1 a§pnf i BUiJBqs'd'l I -/PS 1 •sisoo 01 se jepjo ON "lissi! e6eis uoissiLupe 941 ie 'psssiuusipsi uoititsd 94} 'AiiuenbasuoQ •uoipipsunf AjosiAjedns 10 esiojaxe ui 90U8jajj9}ui Buuinbej p8u6ndiu! sjapjo eqi 4ioq ui AieudojdLui jo Ai!|e68||! Aue puy }ou op | -uoiteuaiie 01 6u!}B|8j jspjo LUU81UI 341 pessed 8AB4 Aeqi 'ejie jeiui 'Ai!|eBa||! Aue peuiiuiuoo lou eAeq MO|eq sijnoo 9L|i 'M0|aq synoo eqi qpq uo peisaA uoipipsunf BLUOS f^Sk.