IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION No. 3496 OF 2006 PETITION No. 3496 OF 2006 PETITION No. 3496 OF 2006 Sanjeev D. Nikamdgut ... Petitioner Vs. Manjusha S. Nikam ... Respondent Mr. N. R. Bubna, Advocate, for the Petitioner. CORAM CORAM CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. : V.C. DAGA, J. : V.C. DAGA, J. DATE DATE DATE : AUGUST 28, 2006. : AUGUST 28, 2006. : AUGUST 28, 2006. P.P. P. C. C. C. . Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. No case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. The view taken by the Court below is reasonable and possible, which can be supported on the basis of material produced on record. In the petition factual finding has not been challenged. In this view of the matter, Petition is dismissed in limine. [ V. C. DAGA, J. ] V. C. DAGA, J. ] V. C. DAGA, J. ]