IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.21186 of 2009 1. JAMSHED ALI s/o Anisur Rahman, 2. Bibi Sajeda Khatoon, w/o Jamshed Ali, Both are resident of vill.- Bailbari, Ganjtola, P.S.-Barari, Distt.-Katihar. . . . . Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 28.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Marriage of the complainant with petitioner no.1 was solemnized 18 years ago. Petitioner no.2 is Soutan of the complainant. Earlier there was illicit relationship of petitioner no.1 with her, what appears improbable in this case that after detection of illicit relationship demand came in picture. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner no.1 divorced the complainant in the year 1992 and petitioner no.2 having 8 children from the wedlock but now they pressurize otherwise with improbable and false story, case has been lodged and petitioners are apprehending their arrest, which can never be justified. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint case no. C.A. 1810 of 2006, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Uday/ (Mandhata Singh, J.)