IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 4TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 13TH BHADRA 1929 CRP.No. 1161 of 2001() ---------------------- CMA.20/1999 of DISTRICT COURT,KOLLAM .................... REVN. PETITIONERS/PETITINERS IN I.A: ------------------------------------------------ 1. PADMAVATHY, CHENGOTTU VEEDU, MAYYANAD CHERRY, MAYYANAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 2. PADMAJAN, CHENGOTTU VEEDU, MAYYANAD CHERRY, MAYYANAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 3. SREEKALA VALSAN, CHENGOTTU VEEDU, MAYYANAD CHERRY, MAYYANAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 4. PADMADERSAN, CHENGOTTU VEEDU, MAYYANAD CHERRY, MAYYANAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 5. PADMASREE, CHENGOTTU VEEDU, MAYYANAD CHERRY, MAYYANAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.SANTHALINGAM SRI.A.D.SHAJAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------ 1. NANDINI, PANAVILA VEEDU, CHIRAKKARA THAZHAM, CHERRY, KALLUVATHUKKAL VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 2. DINESAN, PYNERIYIL VEEDU, POLAYATHODU, KOLLAM. 3. RAVEENDRANATHAN, SAI KIRAN, MAYYAND CHERRY, MAYYANAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM. R3 BY ADV. SRI.K.SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN,J ================ C.R.P.No.1161 of 2001 ================= Dated this the 4th day of September, 2007 ORDER It is brought to my notice that a C.R.P was filed against the order in C.M.A.No.20/1999 of the District Court, Kollam, as C.R.P.No.2887/2001. The said C.R.P was preferred against the main order in the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. The present revision petition is against the dismissal of a petition to condone the delay in filing that C.M.A. Since the C.R.P against the C.M.A itself has been dismissed on 9.12.2004 there is nothing survives in this C.R.P and therefore it is dismissed as infructuous. M.N.KRISHNAN,JUDGE dvs