IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 8325 of 2008 Between: Thwalba Khanam,(A-4) W/o. Saleem, R/o. D.No. VI - 717, Upstairs, Gundluru Street, Madapapalle. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 2 S.Rubeena Taj, W/o. M.Abdul Kareem Khan, D.No. 14-403, Prakasam Street, Madanapalle Town, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto call for the records pertaining to CC.No. 379 of 2008 on the file of the Court of II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Madanapalle, Chittoor District The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.NAGARJUNA REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 6835 of 2009 Between: 1 M. Ammanulla Khan S/o. Kamal Basha D.No. 17-390-20-1, NVR Street extensilon, Nehru Nagar, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 2 M. Choty Jan W/o. M. Ammanulla Khan D.No. 17-390-20-1, NVR Street extensilon, Nehru Nagar, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 2 S. Rubeena Taj W/o. M. Abdul Kareem Khan Dr.No.14-403, Prakasham Street, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto quash the proceedings in CCNo.379 of 2008 on the file of the II Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Madanapalle, Chittoor District so far as the petitioner is concerned The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER Hon’ble Sri Justice P. Swaroop Reddy Crl.P.Nos. 8325 of 2008 and 6835 of 2009 Common order: As both these petitions are filed to quash C.C.No. 379 of 2008 pending on the file of the learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Madanapalle, Chittoor District, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. Though the allegations in both these petitions are somewhat omnibus in nature, still it cannot be said that there is no prima facie case against the petitioners, at all. In the circumstances, it is directed that the trial of the case shall be completed expeditiously. However, the presence of the petitioners may be dispensed with during the trial, on an appropriate petition being filed in this behalf and on their being properly represented. However, the petitioners shall be present before court on the date of framing of the charge; examination under section 313 Cr.P.C., and on the date of judgment. 3. With the directions as above, the petitions are disposed of. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. Dated:09—11---2009 *BVS