is^ WRIT PETmON CS) No. 4665 of2008 .ey ^ PETITIONER : 1. Mithlesh Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Uday Ram Sahu, Aged about 27 yeai-s, Woi-idng as Phannacist Grade-II, (Class III) at Connnunity Healfh Center Ainoda, R/o ViJlage Post - Amoda, Distt. Kariker (C.G.) WRSUS RJESPONDENTCS) : 1. State of Chbattisgarh Through its Secretary, Departmeiit ofHealth aiid Faniily Welfai-e D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Health Services, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Medical and Health OfBcer, Kariker, Distt. North Bastar, Distt. Kaiiker (C.G.) 4. Biock Medical Officer, Gommunity Health Center, Narfaarpur, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2^6 OFTHE GONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. AgnUiotri. J. Present: Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate for thepetitioner. Sliri Y.S.ThaJair, Deputy Advocate Geaeral forthe State/respondents ORAL ORDER (Passed on 27th day of August, 2008) 1. .Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner, on instrucfions, submits that the petitioner does not want to press this on merit at fhis stage. However, fhe respondent-authorities may be directed to consider and decide the pending representation dated 23.6.2008 (Annexure P/4), in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. 2; Shri lliakur, Deputy Advocate General for tfae State/respoadents submite tiiat there is no reason asto why the representation of the petitioner, as stated above should not be considered expeditiously. Shri Thakur submits fhat the above-stated representation shall be considered and decided by the concemed authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period oftwo weeks from fhe date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 3. In view ofthe clear statement made by leamed couasel appearmg for tlie State/respondents, accordingto leamed counsel appearingforthe petitioner, nothing remaias to be adjudicated. , 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Amist hniT^Tt Sd/-.:'^-;^- SatishK.Agnfflom _ Judge B&""*sat®^ 6i'*fera!»i»lfe^§"; Tir t!