THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 11001 OF 2011 Dated: 20.04.2011 Between: The Managing Committee of A.V.M. High School ..... PETITIONER AND Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 11001 OF 2011 ORDER : The petitioner herein, which is a School, was allotted 2000 sq.yards of land situated in survey No.91 at Premavathi Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Rangareddy District vide G.O.Ms.No.183, Revenue (Q) Department, dated 25.01.1980. However, by subsequent order vide G.O.Ms.No.1130, Revenue Department, dated 13.06.2005, the Government had cancelled the allotment order dated 25.01.1980. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed W.P.No.13111 of 2005 and by order dated 20.06.2005, this Court granted interim suspension of G.O.Ms.No.1130, dated 13.06.2005. Thus, the petitioner has been continuing in possession of the building constructed on the land in question. It is stated that the petitioner made a representation before the respondents Corporation for allotment of a door number to the building since the same is required to approach the Hyderabad Metro Water Works and Sewerage Board for obtaining the sewerage and water connection. The said request of the petitioner was rejected by the Corporation by order dated 02.02.2011 on the ground of pendency of Writ Petition No.13111 of 2005. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition is filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2. It is true that the allotment in favour of the petitioner was cancelled by order vide G.O.Ms.No.1130, dated 13.06.2005. However, the operation of the said order has been suspended by this Court by order dated 20.06.2005 in W.P.M.P.No.16661 of 2005 in W.P.No.13111 of 2005 and the said order is admittedly in force as on today. In the circumstances, the request of the petitioner ought not to have been rejected by the respondents merely on the ground of pendency of writ petition. The proper course would have been to allot the door number subject to the result of the writ petition, if the petitioner’s application is otherwise in order. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 02.02.2011 is hereby set aside and the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to pass an order afresh allotting the door number to the premises in question, subject to the result of the Writ Petition No.13111 of 2005. No costs. ___________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 20.04.2011 Ivd