^p6s}f^°/o$ •BEEC^E THE ST.JfflS ADMINISO'RXCIVE IRIBUN^, PENCH JABSLPUR. C.A. (S5.tL^/9^ .2£>PLIC.'kNT NON-<$1PLIGWTS P^adhelal Bilthare. aged about >i s-years, S/o'L.P' pyili-LnA.fe. occupation- Sub Bigineer, ^iater Ri:asources Departmcnt, Division Pendra P.oad, Distt.Bilaspur( ) -Versus- ; l. State of Madhys Fraciesh throiigh Secre-tary,' Nater Besources'Departme'nt, Vallabh Bhawan. Bhopal (M.P.) 2. "Sngineer-in-Chis f, Wat.sr Eesources Gepartmen-t, Governmsnt of M.p., Bhopal (M.P.) DET.AILS OF THE WPIiICaiON ^•PL.LC^CION_^j/s_190F_T ^iDI-aNISTR.ffl'IVE TRIBUNaLS .<CT, 1985^ |i";irI'tTfp-Ti~-~ ""siiitilS HIGH COIXRT OF CHHATnSGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 1280 of2005 Petitioner . Radhelal BUthare Versus Respondents State of Madhya Pradesh (now Chhatdsgarh) & anofhcr (SB: Hon'blc Shri Satish K. Agmhotn J.) Shri Rajesfr'PaBdey, Advocate for the petitiolier. Shri A. V. Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the respondeats. 2. ORDER (Orall (Passed on this 16th day of Noveniber, 2009) Heard. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner submits that the petitioner has inade a representation on 7.10.1995 (ArmcxuTe A/3) for placing bia name at appropriate place ia fhe seiuority/gradation list froin fhe date of his appoiatmcnt. He further submits that no decision has been taken by the respondents, tiU date, on his representatiou. Shri A. V. Shridhar, leamed Paael Lawyer subimts that thcre is no reason asto why fhe decision should not be taken on fhe representation, as this is a iiiatter of placement of the name of the petitioner ia ffae seiuorily/gradation list, at appropriate place. He furfher subnuts fhat siace the representation was submitted on 7.10.1995, it would be appropriate to permit fhe petitioner to make a fi-csh representation before the concemed authority. The representatiou, if any, inay be considered and decided by the concemed authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, withiu a period of six weeks fix>m the date of receipt ofthe representatiou. In view ofthe above, according to leamed counsel appearmg for fhe petitioner, uothing siuvives for adjudrcation at this stage. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of wifh fhe afore-stated liberty. No order sato costs. Thalmr