THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5228 of 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 08.12.2009, passed in I.A.No.2095 of 2008 in O.S.No.1706 of 2000 on the file of the V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal, whereby the application filed under Order VII Rules 14 and Section 151 C.P.C., requesting the Court to receive the documents specified therein, was dismissed. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner herein instituted the said suit for perpetual injunction and sought the relief of temporary injunction, however, the same was dismissed by the Court below. Aggrieved by the same, she filed C.M.A.No.85 of 2001 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Warangal, wherein an interim order of temporary injunction was granted in her favour. By virtue of the said order, the petitioner completed construction of the house and is residing in the said house. She stated that her neighbouring plot owner instituted O.S.No.1172 of 2000 and the said suit was decreed by a competent civil Court on 30.03.2007. She further stated that her neighbouring plot owner purchased the schedule land in the said suit from the same society from whom she purchased the suit land, and hence, in those circumstances, after trial, the petitioner filed an application under Order 7 Rule 14 and Section 151 C.P.C. requesting the Court below to receive the decree and judgment passed in O.S.No.1772 of 2000, dated 30.03.2007 and mark the same. However, the same was dismissed by the Court below. As against the said order, the petitioner approached this Court and filed the present Civil Revision Petition. Heard both sides and perused the relevant material papers available on record. In my considered view, the electricity bills, municipal tax receipts and photographs, which are admittedly subsequent to the filing of the said suit cannot be marked as exhibits. So far as the decree and judgment passed in O.S.No.1772 of 2000 is concerned, as it is the contention of the learned for the petitioner that the petitioner herein and the petitioner’s neighbouring land owner purchased the land form the same society, the decree and judgment passed in O.S.No.1772 of 2000 may have some relevancy to the present suit. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside, and the Court below is hereby directed to receive the said documents, however, subject to its admissibility. However, there shall be no order as to costs. ___________________________________ JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA 28th March 2011 DR