IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T)No. 14506 of 2008. Decided on: 18.6.2011. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ramesh Chand … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. … Respondents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner claims the benefit of ad hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgments of this Court rendered in LPA No. 36 of 2011, Sita Ram versus State of H.P. and CWP No. 4550 of 2010, Ravi Kumar versus State of H.P. and another, along with connected matters. As prayed for, it is open for the petitioner to bring this fact to the notice of the respondents, who shall examine the same. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment, referred to above and take appropriate action within a period of four months from the date of production of copy of this judgment along with his representation and a copy of the writ petition as well as a copies of the judgments referred to above, by the petitioner. 2. In view of the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. ( Justice V.K. Sharma), Judge. June 18, 2011. (cr/virender) 2