^ BEPORE THE .HOI<r'BLE STATE ADmNISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BENCH AT R&IPUR, CHHATTISOARH. ,.,. ..^•^•lt-l<l-0/-' Origiaal Aspl.^catiga No._^ /2001 Satish Kuraar Upadhyay, Son of Shri Kuajlal Upadhyay, Age 41 years, Assistant Teacher, Posted at BiSys^-Primary Scbool , Devkac, Block Saja, Educatioa District, Beraetara, District Dur-g (C.G.) 2. Dinesh Kumar Agrawal» Son of Sbri Kaashal Kumar Agrawal, Age 23 years, Assistant Teacher, Boys Primary School Devkar. Block Saja, Education District Bemetara, District Qurg (C.Q.) 3« Cliaadrs Prakash Siagh Thakur, Son of Shri Shankar Siagh Thakur, Age 35 years, Assistant Teacber, Posted at Girls Primary School Gadadhih, Block Saja, Educatioa District Beraetara, District Darg (c.G.) 4. inzir Rajesh KLimar Tiwari, Son of Vishwanath Prasad Tiwari, Age 36 years, Assistant Teacher, Posted at Girls Primary School Gadadhih, Block Saja, Education District Bemetara, District Durg (c.Q.) s; 02 ;s 5. Brijesh Kumar Tiwary, Son of Shri Vishwanatii Tiwarri . Age 31 years, Assistaat Teacher, posted at Primary School Dehari , Block Saja, Education District Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.) 6. Raj Kamsr Paadey, Soa of Shri Chandra shekhar Sfaarma, Age 34 years, Assistant Teacher, Posted at Primary School Dihpara Devkar, Block Saja, Edu.cation District Benetara, District Durq (c.G.) Applicants Versua State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Sducation Department, Mantralaya, O.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Uhhattisgarh. Director, Publie lastruction, Pension Bada, Raipur, chhattisgarh. Distri.et Education Officer, Education District Bemetara, District Durg (c.G.) ... . •Bl ^ ^ Non-Applic ants ii 03 ;s APPLICATIOH UBIDER SECTION 19 OS- STATE ADMIOTSTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ACT .1985 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.4497 (5F 2005 Petitioners Satish Kumar Upadhyay and others Respondents versus State ofChhattisgarh and others Present • Mr. Rahul Birtharey, coiinsel for the petitioners- Mr. Aiay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/' Stete. ORDER (Passed on 29U1 ofAugust, 2006) The petitioners have filed this petition seeking two additional increments with retrospective effect on the ground that they have obtained B.Ed. Degree. 2. Leamed counsel for the petitioners submits that the cases ofthe petitioners are squarely covered by the decision ofthis Court in Yashwant Kvmar Bharadwaj vs. Municipal Corporation, Dt-srg andcsnothe^ and in Writ Petition No.3268/2006 (RohitKumar z Verma vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others). It is, therefore, submitted that the District E^lucation Officer, Durg be directed to decide the cases of the petitioners in the light of the above-stated decisions of this Court. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents/'State has no objection. 3. Having heard leamed counsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances ofthe case, the District Education Officer, Durg is directed to examine the cases of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 4. With the aforesaid direction, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs- Certified copy as per mles. 1 - 2006 (m MPJR-CG 96