IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18598 of 2008 RANI DEVI Versus L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.18656 of 2008 UGRA CHANDRA JHA Versus L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.18729 of 2008 HASINA KHATOON & ANR Versus THE L.N.M.UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.18904 of 2008 ALO BOSE Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.56 of 2009 TARENDRA THAKUR Versus L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.2724 of 2009 KAPILESHWAR SAHU Versus THE V.C.,LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA ----------- WITH CWJC No.2970 of 2009 BAGISHWAR SHARMA Versus L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.3541 of 2009 SURYA NARAIN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.3570 of 2009 DR.ABHAYA NANDAN PD.CHAUDHARY Versus 2 THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.3583 of 2009 SMT.GAYATRI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.3598 of 2009 SURENDRA PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.3673 of 2009 PROF.RAM NARAYAN ROY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.3742 of 2009 RAM PRASAD ROY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.3939 of 2009 RAM CHANDRA CHAUDHARY Versus L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.4132 of 2009 LAKHPATI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.4189 of 2009 SUDHA DEVI Versus THE V.C.,L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSIT ----------- WITH CWJC No.4418 of 2009 MRITYUNJAY PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.4732 of 2009 3 RAM PYARE PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.4966 of 2009 MAHAKANT JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR &ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.5009 of 2009 SHAILENDRA KUMAR CHOUDHARY Versus THE V.C.,L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSIT ----------- WITH CWJC No.5555 of 2009 DR.SHAKIR AHMAD YAHYA Versus L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.5577 of 2009 SUNDESHWAR ROY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.5830 of 2009 DR.SUNIL NARAYAN LAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS WITH CWJC 10292 OF 2009 UMESH CHANDRA MEHTA VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 25.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the respondents – University. All the writ applications are related to common issue with regard to the payment of retiral dues and other dues, as such they have been heard 4 together and are being disposed of by this common order. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents – University submits that University is eager to settle the pending claims, in case petitioners file a representation stating the details of their claims, the same would be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of their claims, petitioners propose to file separate representation before the respondent – Vice- Chancellor of the University enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of such claim along with certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today. In case such representations are filed, the respondent – Vice-Chancellor of the University shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioners in their representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the pending claims of the petitioners could be settled with statutory interest without delay. However, if any of the claims upon 5 consideration are found not admissible, the same shall be communicated to the petitioners with reasons thereof. All the above writ application are disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)