IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2011 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1933 OP(C).No. 4111 of 2011(O) ------------------------------------- IA. 1291/2011 IN OS.268/2011 of PRL.MUNSIFF COURT,KOZHIKODE-I .................... PETITIONER (S): ---------------------------- PRIYADARSINI V.T., AGED 38 YEARS, W/O. P.C.PRAHLADAN, HOUSE NO.13/426, MADAYIL HOUSE, KARIYATHAN KAVU P.O., BALUSSERY, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. KHYUNI SOPIA SOUMITHRAN, AGED 48 YEARS, W/O.CHELLAPPAN, AKSHAYA, 13/426, VALLOMBRATH THAZHAM NILAM, AMBALATH KULANGARA, CHELANNUR, KOZHIKODE 673 616. 2. M.K.CHELLAPPAN, S/O.M.C. KUNHAPPAN, T.M.G. OFFICE, CENTRAL REGIONAL P & T DEPARTMENT, KOCHI 11. THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss OP(C) NO.4111/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS. 268/2011. P2:- COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE PETITIONER. P3;- COPY OF THE PETITION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION. P4:- COPY OF THE COUTNER AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE PETITIONER IST DEFENDANT P5:- COPY OF THE IA 1413/2011 FLED BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE tss THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J. ==================================== O.P(C) No.4111 of 2011 ==================================== Dated this the 14th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T First defendant in O.S. No.268 of 2011 of the court of learned Principal Munsiff, Kozhikode-I is the petitioner before me. First respondent filed the suit against petitioner trespassing into the schedule building and interfering with the residence of first respondent in the said building. An ex parte, interim order of injunction was also passed against petitioner on Ext.P3, application; but no final order was passed on Ext.P3, application though petitioner preferred Ext.P4, counter. Hence Ext.P5, application on 13.06.2011 to advance hearing of Ext.P3, application. Still no final order has been passed on Ext.P3, application. Hence it is prayed that a direction may be issued to the learned Munsiff to dispose of Exts.P3 and P5, applications as early as possible. 2. Without understanding the volume of work of the court concerned and priority for disposal of older cases a direction for time bound disposal could not be issued. But learned Munsiff shall bear in mind the legislative mandate for disposal of the O.P(C) No.4111 of 2011 -: 2 :- application where interim order of injunction has been granted within 30 days. Petitioner can request the learned Munsiff to expedite disposal of Ext.P3, application if there is no legal impediment in doing so and if any such request is made learned Munsiff shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders as early as possible in the light of the observations made above. Original Petition is disposed of as above. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. vsv