HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 5098 of 2008 Petitioner Panch Ram Mahadewa, aged about 38 years, S/o. Shri Babuial Mahadewa, presentiy wcrking as Sub Treasury Ofr‘Icer, Kharsiya, Eistrict Raigam, Chhattisgarh. Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhatkisgarh, thfough the Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department ef Finance, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantrakaya, Raipur (CG). 2. The Under Secretarv,‘ Government of Chhatrjsgarh, Department of Ftnance, D.K.S. Bhawan, Manttalaya, Raipur. Chhaaisgarh. 4 The Director/Commissioner, Treasury, Accounts & Pension, Shanka: Nagat, Raipur‘ (CG). 4. The Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts & Pension, Biiaspur, Chhattisgarh. 5. The District Treasury Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG). 6. The Sub Divisionai Ofiicer (Revenue), Kharsiya, District Raigarh (CG). (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india) SB: Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Mr. Vinay Pandey and Shri V. Vijay, ceunsei for the petitioner. Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advocate Generai for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 12‘" day of September. 2098) With the consent of iearned‘counsei appearing for the parties, the petition is heard tinaiiy. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on meriw, at this stage. HoWeyer, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the concemed 2) 4.2’ authorities within a period of three days and the same may be dérected to be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within the prescribed time. 3) Mr. Y.S. Thakur, iearned Deputy Advocaie General appearing for the Smte submits that if the representation is made, the same shaii be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits. within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 4) Mr. Thakur further submits that no coercive steps shalt be taken against the petitioner, tiii the disposal of the representation. 5) i hope and trust that the State Government shatt examine the representation objectively in accordance with law and guidelines, issued by the Government time to time 6) in View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Consequentiy, pending appiications, if any, stand disposed of. [i\ lSatish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge Sdl- Rn ai 3‘5