IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18291 of 2010 KULBHUSHAN GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 9.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the informant and the State. Parties are at business term. Informant is financer while petitioner is producer. A cheque issued by the petitioner bounced for which a case is pending in criminal side, another case in civil side also is pending filed on behalf of informant for realization of money effected in business transaction. A news item published in a magazine “Complete Cinema” that suit filed on behalf of the informant for realization of money basing forgery was dismissed. On query it was given on behalf of magazine in written that copy of judgment and decree of dismissal (forged) was produced by this petitioner before Editorial Board basing which the news item was published which the petitioner is denying. I also failed to understand how the right and interest of the informant is effected by that news item or production of the forged judgment and decree if really was produced by this petitioner. 2 Certainly parties are at litigating term. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in Kotwali P.S. Case No. 40 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)