IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 2964 of 2008(C) ------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. DR.SHAJO SEBASTIAN, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.K.C.SEBASTIAN, KANDAKKUDY HOUSE, KAINADY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. JOBIE S.KANDAKKUDY, AGED 40 YEARS, KANDAKKUDY HOUSE, KAINADY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOBI JOSE KONDODY. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, COLLECTORATE P.O., KOTTAYAM. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PANACHIKKADU VILLAGE OFFICE, PANACHIKKADU P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. THE GEOLOGIST, MINING AND GEOLOGY DISTRICT OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, COLLECTORATE P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH, ADV. SRI. P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/02/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.2964/2008-C: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE SALE DEED DTD. 25/05/2007 EXECUTED BETWEEN THE P.1. AND HIS VENDOR. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE SALE DEED DTD. 18/08/2007 EXECUTED BETWEEN THE P.2. AND HIS VENDORS. EXT.P.3: COPIES OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING THE LIE AND NATURE OF THE PROPERTIES COVERED VIDE EXHIBIT P.1. AND P.2. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DTD. 10/01/1978 ISSUED BY THE INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE TEMPORARY INJUNCTION ORDER DTD. 11/01/2008 ISSUED BY THE R.2. TO THE P.2. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 2964 OF 2008 C = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 25th February, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that by Ext. P5, the 2nd respondent has stopped all works for making the land purchased by the petitioner a house site. 2. A reading of Ext. P5 shows that this is only a stop memo and that proceedings have not been finalised by the said order. In view of this I feel, the appropriate course to be adopted is to require the 2nd respondent to finalise the proceedings with notice to the affected parties. 3. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the proceedings pursuant to Ext. P5 issued by the 2nd respondent shall be finalised by the said respondent with notice to the petitioners and others who are likely to be affected by any such order. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-