IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3405 of 2010(O&M) Date of decision:.07.12.2011 Sardul Singh ....Petitioner Versus Bhupinder Singh ....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Divanshu Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate for the respondent. * * * RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL) This is landlord's revision petition challenging the impugned order dated 30.11.2011 whereby in a petition under Section 13-B of East Punjab Urabn Rent Restriction Act, 1949, the respondent-tenant has been granted leave to defend. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted before this Court that in case, trial is expedited, the petitioner will not raise any issue before this Court against the impugned order. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made. In view of the submissions, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the Rent Controller, Nawanshahr, to dispose of the pending ejectment petition within a period of six months, from the receipt of certified copy of this order. December 07, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) savita JUDGE