SBCWP NO.7683/09. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7683/2009. Laxminarayan Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of Order:- May 10, 2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Kailash Chandra Sharma for the petitioner. ***** BY THE COURT:- This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner who is under suspension because of a criminal case registered against him under the provisions of Sections 7 & 13(1)(d)(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 vide order dated 18/3/2002 (Ann.3). Shri Kailash Chandra Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that almost nine years have gone by now and the criminal case instituted against him will take its own time. In such circumstances, no purpose will be served in keeping the petitioner under suspension. Learned counsel further submits that he has been falsely implicated in the criminal case which was instituted against him and its pendency will cause immense loss to him. Without going into the merits of the case at this stage, this Court considers it appropriate SBCWP NO.7683/09. 2 to direct the petitioner to make a fresh representation to the authority under Rule 13(5) of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1958 for review of its decision placing petitioner under suspension vide order dated 18/3/2002 (Ann.3). If such a representation is made within a period of one month, it is expected from the authority to decide the same within three months, thereafter, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law and decision whereof be communicated to the petitioner. If still petitioner feels aggrieved, he will be free to avail remedy under the law. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil