IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15502 of 2009 DAYANAND SINGH S/O LATE SATYADEO SINGH R/O VILL. AND P.O.- DHOOPNAGAR, DHOBAUL, DISTT.- SARAN. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SARAN, CHAPRA 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER-CUM-EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PANCHAYAT SAMITI NAGRA, DISTT.- SARAN 5. THE PRAMUKH OF THE PANCHAYAT SAMITI, NAGRA, DISTT.- SARAN ----------- 02 31.03.2010 The petitioner is a member of Panchayat Samiti and has filed this writ application for removal of the Pramukh. In my view, the writ application is thoroughly misconceived. If he finds that the Pramukh is incompetently conducting the business then it is open for him to move a no- confidence motion or if he abuses his powers then it is open for him to move the State Government for an action under Section 44 (4) of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner had twice sponsored no-confidence motion against the Pramukh and the motion had failed. He complained to other authorities, who having been found no actionable fault and took no action. In such a situation, learned counsel for the State further submits that no interference is called for. What happens in the Panchayat is the business of the Panchayat. This Court is inept to interfere in those proceedings. Panchayat is a body of self-government - 2 - constituted of elected members and it is for that body to take decisions. It should not be interfered by this Court normally. In that view of the matter, I find no merit in this application, this writ application is, accordingly, dismissed. Trivedi/ (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)