[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 501 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 501 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 501 OF 2005 Mrs. Sheela Rajaram Dheemar ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Ramesh Pandey for the petitioner. Mr. D.R. More, A.P.P. for respondents. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA P. DESAI & CORAM : SMT. RANJANA P. DESAI & CORAM : SMT. RANJANA P. DESAI & ANOOP V.MOHTA JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA JJ. DATE : 11TH OCTOBERE, 2005. DATE : 11TH OCTOBERE, 2005. DATE : 11TH OCTOBERE, 2005. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel, Mr. Pandey for the petitioner. The petitioner’s case is that some antisocial elements are harassing her.It is averred in the petition that they are having evil eyes on her residential premises and they are trying to throw her out by hook or crook. In the petition some incidents have been mentioned. The petitioner has sought police protection. The petitioner has also prayed that respondents 2,3, and 4 be directed to take appropriate action against respondents 15 to 39. In our opinion, the appropriate course for the petitioner would be to file a private complaint before the concerned Magistrate. This is not a case where this Court can [2] interfere it its writ jurisdiction. If any complaint is filed, the learned Magistrate will consider it in accordance with the law and if a case is made out some relief may be granted to her, if possible in law. The petitioner will also be at liberty to approach the concerned department of Bombay Police for protection. This Court has however not expressed any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s case. With these observations the petition is disposed of. (SMT. RANJANA P.DESAI, J) (SMT. RANJANA P.DESAI, J) (SMT. RANJANA P.DESAI, J) [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]