IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2010 / 20TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 25170 of 2010(O) -------------------------- RFA.118/2004 of DISTRICT COURT (ADHOC)III, KOLLAM .................... PETITIONER: --------------- S.SEN, S/O.THYAGARAJAN, SANKARAMANGALATHU VEEDU, KURUMANDAL CHERRY, PARAVOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM TALUK NOW RESIDING AT ZANDU, KACHERY WARD, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.AJAYA KUMAR. G RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. L.RADHABHAI, D/O.KESAVAN, VELLANNOOR VEEDU, MEENATHU CHERRY, SAKTHIKULANGARA, NOW RESIDING AT RADHA BHAVAN OF MEENATHU CHERRY, SAKTHIKULANGARA, KOLLAM- 689 645 2. SAJANI KANTHABHAI, D/O.KESAVAN, PRIYA BHAVAN OF MEENATHU CHERRY, SAKTHIKULANGARA, KOLLAM- 689 645 3. THARABHAI, D/O.KESAVAN, THARA BHAVAN, MEENATHU CHERRY, SAKTHIKULANGARA, KOLLAM- 689 645 4. P.K.LEELABHAI, D/O.KESAVAN, MEENATHU CHERRY, SAKTHIKULANGARA, KOLLAM- 689 645 5. RAJALAKSHMI, D/O.RAMAKANTHABHAI, NOOPURE VEEDU, MEENATHU CHERRY, SAKTHIKULANGARA, KOLLAM- 689 645 6. RETNAVALLY, S/O.PONNAMMA, THEKKEVELLANNOR VEEDU, SAKTHIKULANGARA VILLAGE, KOLLAM- 689 645 7. HEMA THYAGARAJAN, THEKKEVELLANNOR VEEDU, SAKTHIKULANGARA VILLAGE, KOLLAM- 689 645 WP(C).No. 25170 of 2010 8. LEKHA THYAGARAJAN, THEKKEVELLANNOR VEEDU, SAKTHIKULANGARA VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 9. P.K.BALAN, KALLAMPOTTE VEEDU, OOLAMPARA, PEROOKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------- W.P.C.No.25170 of 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this 11th day of August, 2010 JUDGMENT Petitioner is respondent No.1 in R.F.A.No.118 of 2004 of the court of learned Additional District Judge (Adhoc-III), Kollam. That appeal arose from judgment and decree in O.S.No.623 of 1995 of the court of learned Principal Sub Judge, Kollam. Complaint of petitioner is that appeal was heard twice but on account of transfer of the Presiding Officer concerned it could not be disposed of. Now it is posted in the month of September, 2010. Petitioner wants an early disposal of the case. 2. It is seen that appeal is of the year 2004 and as learned counsel would puts it, matter was heard atleast twice but on account of transfer of Presiding Officer it could not be disposed of. The suit is of the year 1995. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case learned Additional District Judge is directed to dispose of the appeal as early as possible. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (THOMAS P JOSEPH, JUDGE) Sbna/-