1 ARAPP87/11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.87 OF 2011 M/s Bombay Railway Engineering Co. ...Applicants v/s General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai ...Respondent Mr G.V. Merani, Partner of Applicant Company in person. Mr Suresh Kumar for Respondent. CORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH J. DATE : 9TH JUNE 2011. 2 ARAPP87/11 P.C. :- 1] Admittedly, there is already an award made. It appears that an application under section 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 was made for correction of mistakes in the award, that application is still pending. It is an undisputed position that there is already an award passed by the Arbitrator. So long as the award continues to exist, again an Arbitrator cannot be appointed under section 11 of the Act. Application is totally misconceived. It is rejected. Applicants to pay costs of this application to the respondent. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary of this Court. Certified copy expedited. ( JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH )