IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2009 / 29TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 20327 of 2009(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.P.ANILKUMAR,KAVIL VEEDU, THURUTHIKKARA,KUNNATHOOR,KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR SRI.JELSON J.EDAMPADAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,KOLLAM. 2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), IN CHARGE OF ADMINISTRATOR, SASTHAMCOTTA CO-OPERATIVE ARD BANK LTD.Q 373, SASTHAMCOTTA BHARANIKKAVU,KOLLAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSHKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.20327 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner claims to be the power of attorney holder of his brother and mother. In the name of his brother Sri. K.P. Sreekumar, he availed an agricultural loan of Rs.1 lakh, housing loan of Rs.2 lakhs and industrial loan of Rs.50,000/-. Similarly in the name of his mother, he has obtained Rs.2 lakhs as housing loan, Rs.1 lakh as agricultural loan and Rs. 50,000/- as industrial loan. Except the industrial loan in his mother's name, the rest of of the loans were availed of during 2006 and 2007 and the industrial loan was availed of in 2004. Default was committed in all the loans and Exts.P1 and Ext.P2 series of notices were issued to the defaulters. 2. Now the petitioner has, by filing Exts.P3 and P4 claimed the benefit of the Debt Waiver and Debt Relief WP(c).No.20327/09 2 Scheme, 2008 in respect of the agricultural loans and also reduction in the rate of interest in respect of the housing loans. According to the petitioner no reply has been received to these representations. It is therefore that this writ petition is filed. Taking into account the above grievance, this writ petition is disposed of directing that if Exts.P3 and P4 have been received and are pending, the first respondent shall consider the same and give a reply to those representations, as expeditiously as possible, on the production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.20327/09 3