IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7690 of 2009 RAM PRAVESH SINHA @ RAMU MAHTO Versus NAGAR PARISHAD LAKHISARAI & ORS ----------- 2 9.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. From the pleadings and the materials which have been brought on record, prima facie the Court is of the opinion that the petitioner has allowed the deviation which has taken place since no substantive action has been taken, right from the month of March, 2009 till the filing of the writ application. Only a legal notice may not be enough in such matter. The petitioner has remedy to safeguard his right before the civil court of competent jurisdiction. This writ application is dismissed with the above liberty. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)