: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.253 OF 2007 Vijay Vasant Angne ..Petitioner. Vs. B.P.Rathod & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.D.S.Chandnani i/b.Lexim Associates for the Petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P. for Respondent nos.1 and 3. Mr.Vijay Patil for Respondent no.2. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 23RD OCTOBER, 2008 DATED : 23RD OCTOBER, 2008 DATED : 23RD OCTOBER, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : I cannot rule out the possibility of a genuine misapprehension on the part of the alleged contemnor in view of the last sentence of the order dated 10.5.2007. Indeed, by an order dated 16.8.2007 time was granted to his counsel for seeking a clarification of the order. 2. Though it is true that the learned Judge on an application for speaking to the minutes of the order stated that no clarification was required, granted two weeks time to the administrator to hand over charge to the managing committee which she did. : 2 : 2. In the circumstances, the apology is accepted. The Contempt Petition is disposed of. 3. It is however made clear now that Respondent no.2 is not entitled to interfere with the management of the society in any manner whatsoever or to represent the society in any manner whatsoever. ***