IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11240 of 2010 MD. NOMAN ALAM @ MD. NOMAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 19.07.2010 Petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the I.P.C. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the mutual divorce was taken on 21.07.2007 on non-judicial stamp paper which is contained in Annexure-3 whereas the present complaint has been filed on 05.09.2007. It is submitted by learned counsel for the complainant that she never signed the talaknama as contained in Annexure-3 and she is ready to live with the petitioner as wife. In view of the aforesaid facts, let the learned S.D.J.M. Purnea get the signature of the complainant verified on talaknama as contained in Annexure-3 from the expert and if it is found that on the talaknama the signature of the complainant is genuine then in that event, petitioner will be directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the 2 like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Purnea in connection with Complaint Case No. 2144 of 2007. It is made clear that if the complainant’s signature was not found to be genuine on talaknama as contained in Annexure-3, then the bail bond of the petitioner will not be accepted and in that eventuality the petitioner will seek for regular bail. It is expected that the petitioner and complainant will appear before the S.D.J.M. as and when it is directed by the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Purnea. Till verification of the signature of the complainant, let no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)