IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16398 of 2008 Date of decision: February 3, 2009 Nasib Kumari ... Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana & others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Ravi Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) The petitioner had applied for a post of Arts and Crafts Teacher. In the advertisement, the age mentioned was 18-40 years while as per Rule 5 of Haryana State Education Schoold Cadre (Group 'C') Service Rules, 1998, the age mentioned is 17-35 years. The petitioner was provisionally interviewed under the order of this Court and now her candidature is sought to be rejected on the ground that even though by corrigendum the petitioner had brought in conformity with the Rules yet the petitioner had obtained his original qualification after the date of advertisement cannot be considered. The above said matter is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Sunita & another versus Haryana Staff Selection Commission & another bearing CWP No.16214 of 2008 decided on 07.01.2009. CWP No.16398 of 2008 -2- Consequently, this writ petition is allowed in the same terms. In the circumstances, the respondents are directed to declare the result of the petitioner and if she is found eligible, she should be appointed for the said post. February 03, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE