IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10694 of 2011 1. Hemlal Pandit son of Chedi Pandit. 2. Diwakar Pandit son of Khiro Pandit, Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 8.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Admittedly, the fardbeyan of the informant was recorded in presence of witness Budhan Tanti who subsequently in course of investigation, disclosed the names of the petitioners as it is evident from Para 47 of the case diary as mentioned by the learned court below in impugned order. If the aforesaid Budhan Tanti had seen the petitioners involving in the occurrence, he would certainly have named the petitioners at the time of recording the fardbeyan of the informant Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10, 000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Baunsi P.S. Case No. 108 of 2008 (G.R. No. 1348 of 2008). Prakash ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)