1 wp2141.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.2141 OF 2011 Shakti Commercial Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. : Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. : Respondents .... Mr.Vinay Sonpal for the petitioner. Mr.V.S.Gokhale, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for respondent no.1. Mr.A.M.Kulkarni for respondent no.2. Mr.A.A.Garge for respondent no.3. .... CORAM : D.D. SINHA & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATE : JUNE 21, 2011. P.C.: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents. 2. In the present Writ Petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction simplicitor to the respondent no.2 i.e. CIDCO to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 24.12.2010 which is annexed as Exh.`O-II' to the 2 wp2141.11 petition. It is submitted that the said application is pending for decision since 24th December 2010 and, therefore, prays that direction be given to CIDCO to decide the same within a stipulated period, in accordance with law. 3. In the back-drop of the above referred facts, it appears that the petitioner has submitted an application in the month of December 2010 to CIDCO for grant of no objection regarding 100% additional F.S.I. for development of I.T. park as per the new policy which is pending for decision. In these circumstances, it will be appropriate to issue the following directions: The respondent no.2 (CIDCO) is hereby directed to decide the application of the petitioner dated 24.12.2010, if not decided earlier, in accordance with law and the procedure applicable in this behalf, on its own merits within a period of three months. It is made clear that we have not adjudicated upon as to whether the petitioner is entitled for grant of N.O.C. pertaining to 100% additional F.S.I. for development and it is for the respondent no.2 to consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law. 3 wp2141.11 4. With these observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (D. D. SINHA, J.) (A.R. JOSHI, J.)