1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 2185/2008 (Nandkishore Pundlikrao Raut Vs. The C.E.O. Z.P. Amravati & anr.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : JUNE 4, 2008. Heard Mrs. Jog for the petitioner. The petitioner has preferred the instant petition against the order of suspension dated 7/3/2008 on the ground that the petitioner was in the Police custody for more than 48 hours, though the petitioner has no direct or indirect concern with the offence in question. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that under the provisions of the Zilla Parishad (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1964, there is power vested in the competent authority to revoke the suspension and, therefore, the 2 petitioner has already moved an application dated 17/3/2008 under the relevant rules before the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Amravati, however, till this date, no decision has been taken on the said application. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, we asked Mrs. Bodade to accept the notice on behalf of Zilla Parishad and we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the Zilla Parishad to decide the aforesaid application of the petitioner, if not decided earlier, in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard, within a period of three weeks from the date of communication of this order. JUDGE JUDGE RMP