IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 19967 of 2007 Between: 1 Gayatri Educational Development Society, Narsaraopeta Guntur District, Rep. by its Vice President, Ch. Satyanarayana, S/o. Ch. Venkateswarulu. 2 Narasaraopeta Engineering College, Kotappakonda Road, Yellamanda Post, Narsaraopeta Guntur District, Rep. by its Vice-Chairman, Ch. Satyanarayana, S/o. Ch. Venkateswarulu. 3 Mr. Ch. Satyanarayana, S/o. Ch. Venkateshwarulu, R/o. 4A, Pent House, Divya Shakti Apartments, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Convenor, ICET -AC 2007 (SW-III) Admission, Osmania University, Hyderabad. 2 A.P. State Council for Higher Education, Rep. by its Secretary, Masabtank, Hyderabad. 3 The Government of Andhra pradesh, Higher and Technical Education Department, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 4 All India Council for Technical Education, Rep. by its Member Secretary, New Delhi. 5 Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Registrar. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropraite Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not admitting the 2nd Petitioner College MCA course to counselling and in not admitting the 2nd Petitioner College MCA course to counselling and in not admitting students under the convenor quota as being illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction, unconstitutional and consequently direct the 1st respondent to either admit the candidates through counselling or permit the petitioners to fill up the seats through spot admissions and pass such further order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper int he circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 19967 OF 2007 ORDER: 1. This writ petition has been filed assailing the action of the respondents in not allotting the students under the convener quota to the petitioner’s institution for the academic year 2007-08. 2. Learned standing counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent submits that the relief has become infructuous since the academic year 2007-08 has been over. This factual aspect is not contradicted by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 13th August, 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 19967 OF 2007 13th August, 2008.