IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 12TH OCTOBER 2010 / 20TH ASWINA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 6255 of 2010() ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN BA.5721/2010 Dated 27/09/2010 .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED --------------------------------------- 1. PRASHOB, AGED 26 YEARS,S/O.PREMSIGH, KOOKA PARAMBIL, KAZHIBRAM POST, VALAPPAD VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 2. SHINE, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.RAVEENDRAN, VELLEKKATTU HOUSE, KAZHIBRAM POST, VALAPPAD VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 3. SHAFEEQ, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.KADIR, ARAKKAL HOUSE, KAZHIBRAM POST, VALAPPAD VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 4. SAINUDHEEN, AGED 33 YEARS, S/O.ABU, VALIYAKATH HOUSE, KAZHIBRAM POST, VALAPPAD VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 5. SHAKKEER, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O.MUHAMMEDALI, ARAKKAL HOUSE, KAZHIBRAM POST, VALAPPAD VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 6. GAGAN, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.BAGEERADHAN, VAZHAPPULLI HOUSE, KAZHIBRAM POST, VALAPPAD VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 7. DILEESH, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.THILAKAN, THUPRADAN HOUSE, KAZHIBRAM POST, VALAPPAD VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK. Bail Appl..No. 6255 of 2010() 2 8. NISAR, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.SULAIMAN, ARAKKAL HOUSE, KAZHIBRAM POST, VALAPPAD VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ SRI.P.M.ABDUL JALEEL (KODUNGALLUR) RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MATHILAKAM POLICE STATION THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bail Application No.6255 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATED: 12.10.2010 O R D E R In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioners, who are accused Nos.2 to 9 in Crime No.900/2010 of Mathilakam Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143,147, 427 and 452 read with 149 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail. 2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioners on bail for a period of one month in the event of their arrest in connection with the above case on each of them executing a bond for Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the said officer and subject to the following conditions: Bail A.No.6255/ 2010 -:2:- 1. Petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays. 2. Petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation including custodial interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer. 3. Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution. 4. Petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail. 5. Petitioners shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile. If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. sj