'-w, IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Misc. Civil Case No. %3 op 2oii Singte WRIT PETITION (C) No. OF20U PETITIONER /M/s Jagdamba Power & Alloys Limited, through its Director Shri Arun Poddar, S/o Shri Hari Ram Poddar, aged about 42 years, resident of 15/302-Ashoka Ratna, Vidhan Sabha, Road, Raipur, having its registered office at G-16, Hira Arcade, Pandri, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ••^'" c'nA 'l. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, .>"'•• Department of Industries, <!ocvv^!S^m ' ...••••"" QS^ Q ,><"• -\\ Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Chief Electrical Inspectorate, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Superintending Engineer (Electrical Safety) & Chief Electric Inspector, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Tehsildar, Dharseeva, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) APiPLICATION FOR MODIFICATION OF_QRDER_DATED_28.07.2011 v^'.f PASSED IN WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 4085/2011 " M/s Jagdamba Power & Allovs Ltd. VS. State of Chhattisqarh & Others" HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BiLASPUR M.C.C N0. 533 OF 201 1 PETiTSONER RESPONDENTS Ms. Jagdamba Power & Alioys Limited Versus State of Chhaffisgarh & Others APPLiCATiON FOR MOD!FICATSON OF ORDER DATED 28.07.2011 PASSED IN WRlT PETiTION (C) N0. 4085/2011 Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shrl Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Bhaskar Payasi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Moorthv, Dy. A-dvocate General forthe State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 16tn day of August, 2011) I. Thts is an appilcation for rectification of ciencai misiakes crept in the order dated 28.07.2011. 2. Learned counsel aDpearing for fhe petitioner submits that some clerical mistakes have crept in the order daied 28.07.2011 passed by this Court in Vv.P.tC) No.4085 of 2011. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State agrees wiih the suomission of the petltioner. 4. AccordingSy, the oroer dated 28.07.2011 passed in W.P.(C) No.4085 of 2011 is amended as under: 5. in the first para the word beginning from "further" tiii the iast word "souree" sha'! be read as "Further io hoid thaf the petitioner is entitled for exempiion from payment of eieciriciiy duty for 10 years being new industry, as provlded by Industriai- Policv<° 2004-OS issued by the respondent/State in Generai industry Category estsblished in generat area'. in the second para in the third iine beginning from word "petitioner" iing with the wprd 'year 2006" it shail b's rsad as under: Q) .y'.&-^^ "the petitloner having sstablished a new industry in Generai industry category establishsd in generai area and commenced power generaiion from 26.03.2007". Para three of the order reads as under: "From the averments made in the petition, it is found that the petltioner claims to have established a new industry in General Industry caiegor/ estabilshed in the generai area and commenced power generation from 26.03.2007. The industria! Poticy for the year 2004-09 provides for exemption with regard to payment of eiectricity duty for new industry as afore-stated. Therefore, the ciaim of the Detitioner does not appear to be frivoious and requires to fae conslderation". 8. Accordingly, the appiication is aliowed to the above effect. A new revised order with amendmeni be issued. Sd/- AsBtt*ow tisbs^-^&'" jadge ashok