1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 27.09.2011 C o r a m The HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY C.R.P.NPD(MD).No.1942 to 1944 of 2011 & M.P.(MD).Nos.2, 3, 3, 2 and 2 of 2011 R.Govindaraj ..Petitioner/Petitioners/Appellant in all the petitions Vs. S.M.Abdul Rawoof .. Respondent/Respondent/Respondent in all the petitions C.R.P.(MD).No.1942 of 2011 The civil revision petition is filed under Section 25 of Tamil Nadu Buildings/Lease and Rent Control Act to set aside fair and decreetal order, dated 05.08.2008 made in I.A.No.124 of 2005 in R.C.A.No.16 of 1999 on the file of the Court of Principal Subordinate Judge, Rent Control Appellate Authority, Tiruchirappalli and allow the civil revision petition. C.R.P.(MD).No.1943 of 2011 The civil revision petition is filed under Section 25 of Tamil Nadu Buildings/Lease and Rent Control Act to set aside fair and decreetal order, dated 05.08.2008 made in R.C.A.No.16 of 1999 on the file of the Court of the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli confirming the fair and decreetal order, dated 24.07.1999 made in R.C.O.P.No.51/1995 on the file of the Court of Rent Controller (II Additional District Munsif), Tiruchirappalli and allow the civil revision petition. C.R.P.(MD).No.1944 of 2011 The civil revision petition is filed under Section 25 of Tamil Nadu Buildings/Lease and Rent Control Act to set aside fair and decreetal order, dated 14.03.2005 and consequential order dated 05.08.2008 made in I.A.No.177/2003 in R.C.A.No.16/1999 on the file of the court of Rent Control Appellate Authority, Tiruchirappalli (Principal Subordinate Judge) and allow the civil revision petition. For Petitioner : M/s.J.Maria Roseline For respondents: Mr.S.C.Herold Singh COMMON ORDER Heard both sides. 2. The revision petitioner is the tenant in respect of the petition premises. Respondent is the landlord. When the matter is listed for admission, the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petitioner/tenant is prepared to vacate the petition premises and deliver the vacant possession to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 respondent/landlord and sought six months time for vacating the petition premises. However, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/landlord submitted that only three months time should be granted for vacating the petition premises. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been in possession of the petition premises for long time. 4. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and respondent, I am inclined to grant four (4) months time to vacate the petition premises. Accordingly, the revision petitioner/tenant shall vacate the petition premises and hand over the possession to the respondent/landlord, within four months from today, without compelling the respondent/landlord to file execution petition for vacating the tenant. The revision petitioner/tenant had also filed an affidavit of undertaking today to that effect and the same is recorded. The civil revision petitions are disposed of with the above observations. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AS) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Principal Subordinate Judge/ Rent Control Appellate Authority, Tiruchirappalli. 2.The Second Additional District Munsif, Rent Controller,Tiruchirappalli. +1cc to M/s.J.Maria Roseline, Advocate SR.No.33605 Order made in C.R.P.(MD).No.1942 to 1944 of 2011 & M.P.(MD).Nos.2, 3, 3, 2 and 2 of 2011 27.09.2011 jikr PA/28.09.2011/2P/4C(IT) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/