( 1 ) Cri.Appln4833-4821-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4833 OF 2010 1. Chetan Ravindra Chaudhari 2. Milind Ravindra Chaudhari Both r/o Lane No. 6, Dhule, Tq. and Dist. Dhule. APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT .... Mr. S.P. Tiwari, advocate for the applicants. Mr. N.H. Borade, APP for the respondent/State. .... WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4821 OF 2010 1. Prashant Sudam Mahale 2. Bhima @ Pankaj Sudam Mahale 3. Gokul Sudam Mahale, All R/o Plot No. 59, Swaminarayan Society, Dhule, Tq. and District Dhule. APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT .... Mr. R.S. Shinde, advocate for the applicants. Mr. P.P. More, APP for the respondent/State. .... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 9th December, 2010] ( 2 ) Cri.Appln4833-4821-10 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned advocates for the applicants in both the applications and learned APPs in context of both the applications. 2. There are rival complaints regarding the alleged offences. The applicant No. 1 - Chetan was allegedly injured during course of the said incident. There appears head injury sustained by him, but it is not of a grievous nature. The applicant No. 1 - Chetan has filed an application before the police to the effect that the complaint regarding removal of gold chain and gold ring may be amended by deleting such allegation. The investigation papers prima facie indicate that there was mutual fight between the two (2) groups. They filed separate complaints on basis of which Crime No. 312/2010 and Crime No. 314/2010 came to be registered. The learned advocates for the applicants make a statement that the parties are related to each other and have amicably settled the dispute outside the Court and, therefore, the original complainants are not pursuing the complaints. Having regard to the nature of injuries noticed on persons of the complainants and that the seriousness of the offence is perhaps tried to be blown up by making allegation about loss ( 3 ) Cri.Appln4833-4821-10 of gold ornaments and in view of the fact that both the parties are related to each other, the applications deserve favourable consideration. 3. In the result, both the applications are allowed. The applicants are directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds in sum of Rs. 15,000/- (rupees fifteen thousand) each, with a solvent surety in the like sum, to the satisfaction of the Court of Sessions. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/criapln4833-4821-10