IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.263 of 2007 Dr. Raslal Yadav, son of late Ramji Yadav, resident of 303, Minar Plaza, South Gandhi Maidan, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, District-Patna-1, Ex. Principal and University Professor and Head of the Department, K.S. College, Laheriasarai, District-Darbhanga ------ Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Mr. Ashok Kumar Choudhary, Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 2. Mr. Ashok Kumar Choudhary, Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 3. Mr. Madan Mohan Jha, Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga through its Registrar namely Dr. K.P. Singh 5. Dr. Mishri Lal Thakur, Vice Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga 6. Dr. K.P. Singh, Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. 7. Dr. R.K. Mandal, Principal, K.S. College, Laheriasarai, District-Darbhanga ---Contemners ---Opposite Parties. ------------ 10. 5.5.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Santosh Kumar Jha for opposite party nos. 4 to 6. The petitioner of C.W.J.C. No.1033 of 2006 has preferred this application under Article 215 of the Constitution of India, read with Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, and alleges non-implementation of the order dated 10.10.2006, whereby the writ petition was disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate 2 representation with respect to his claim which had accrued while he was in service before the Registrar, L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga, who shall consider the same and ensure payment of the lawful dues admissible to him. The University and its functionaries have placed on record their show-cause. It appears that in view of the due observance of the order of this Court, the petitioner had submitted his representation before the Registrar, who had issued letter dated 19.2.2009, to the petitioner, to appear in person on 2.3.2009, at 2.30 P.M., for personal hearing. The petitioner failed to appear on that day as a result of which the Registrar of the University was compelled to dispose of the matter ex-parte. The petitioner’s representation has been disposed of by order dated 13.10.2009, whereby sum of Rs. 7,47,873/- was found due by way of his lawful dues admissible to him while he was in service and has been paid to him by Cheque no. 020846, dated 9.10.2009. It thus appears to us on a perusal of the materials on record that the order of this Court has been complied with, and the entire dues of the petitioner have been paid to him, and nothing survives for consideration. 3 This application is accordingly disposed of. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar,J. )