, ^^ IN THE V.? HIG^ .1'""^. ^^ '••^ COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Contempt Case No. ^ -of2010. PETITIONERS : /Beeju Singh, aged about 54 years, Son of Late Shri Jhirga Smgh, Resident of Raju ^-^ ^ <^^:; A^*' <^.^-^ ^ ^•^ .^•y '.^' ^^b -.»•• Vihar Near Woman Industrial Training Institute Korba (C.G.). VE R S US RESPONDENT: 7~ Shri Virendra Kumar Rathor, Development Officer /Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayt Korba, (C.G.). CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1973: CT^T^T hv\\^ 3n^?r 5h^ic^ 'yf^a Prayeea ^oEr ^ii^jid^, ^Tl1yJI<o, i^^i^^< _.c^.^.^..&^7^a WR^rr^Hscb yM fc(^^ ^STT^T'^TTW^cT SB : Hon>ble Sfari Manindr^ 9.02.2011 couitisel Shri R.K. Jaiswal, Shri J.P. Shulda, coun|sel daUd tlie witDunthe p4yable; Leamed counsel forl compliance of the order W.P. (S) 4235/09, though same has not been done Leamed counsel for averment made in the reply), which was found due and same has been received in| also. He submits that due to| monfti ofAugust, the same on pursuance of fhe aufh< petltioner have been made. Taking into considerati|on counsel for fhe parties and complied with and also caused in compliance of fh< respondent is accepted. The rule is aecordingly Consequentfy, the petit <=hl<4id^rl TnT^ff ^ fecst <pyi<^l< ^3rf^rq371^T Mohan Shrivastava, J. for the petitioner. for the respondent. fhe petltioner submits that in 19.3.2010 passed by fhis Court in payments have been released, fhe time stipulated by fhe Court. the respondent, referring to fhe submitted that fhe entire amount, yable, has already been paid and tihe the banlc account of fhe pett<ioner lack of allotment in payments for fhe |:ould not be withdrawn and later on, >rity, ftnaUy, all flie claims of the the submissions made by leamed tiat fhe order of fhis Gourt has been into consideration the delay order, the apology tendered by fhe t4king jdischarged. ^on m finaMy disposed of. Manl..^r^ »e 3udS€ rl i;i