IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH OCTOBER 2011 / 27TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 27659 of 2011(F) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- NARAYANI GOWRI, KALLUMPURATHU VEEDU, KOTTAPURATHU CHERI, KOTTAPURAM VILLAGE, PARAVOOR. BY ADV. SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN, SRI.T.K.ANANDA PADMANABHAN. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM - 691 001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KOLLAM - 691 001. 3. PARVATHY PADMAVATHY, BALAKRISHNAPURATHU VEEDU, MEENADU CHERI, MEENADU VILLAGE, PIN - 691 121. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.MOHAMMED SHAH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/10/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 27659 of 2011(F) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIIBT-P1- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL NO. 14938/2011 DATED 05/07/2011. EXHIBIT-P2- TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER TO THE TAHSILDAR DATED 04/07/2011. EXHIBIT-P3- TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE TAHSILDAR DATED 14/06/2011. EXHIBIT-P4- TRUE COPY OF THE A FORM DATED 05/07/2011 ISSUED BY THE TAHSILDAR. EXHIBIT-P5- TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER DATED 25/07/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 27659 of 2011 F ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 19th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petitioner says that, against mutation granted in favour of the third respondent, she has filed Ext.P5 appeal, invoking the power under Rule 18 of the Transfer of Registry Rules, 1966 and that the said appeal is pending before the first respondent. In this writ petition, what is sought for is an expeditious disposal of Ext.P5 appeal. Now that the statutory appeal (Ext.P5) is pending before the first respondent, without expressing anything on the merits of the rival contentions raised, I dispose of the writ petition, directing that the first respondent will consider Ext.P5 appeal, with notice to the petitioner and the third respondent and orders thereon will be passed, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within six weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/19/10