IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9221 of 2011 Md.Rashid & Anr Versus Md.Salahuddin & Ors ----------- 02. 27.06.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 5. This writ application has been filed by the petitioners for fixing the order dated 18.04.2011 passed by Subordinate Judge 8th, Ara in Eviction Suit No.1 of 2010 whereby the learned Court below has rejected the application filed by the petitioners to exhibit the documents i.e. the Certificate granted by the Principal regarding the date of birth of respondent no.4. Admittedly, the suit was filed under Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 for eviction of the petitioners and the respondent no.6 from the suit premises. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below has found that the evidences of the plaintiffs have already been closed and the evidence on behalf of the petitioners are at the last stage and at this stage, the application has been filed for calling for the original records only with a view to prove the Certificate granted by the Principal of the concerned school. This application was filed to prove 2 the fact that on the date of execution of the sale deed in the year 1959, one of the executants was not in existence. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below has assigned good reasons for not accepting the prayer of the petitioners. I find that the learned Court below has acted within its jurisdiction. Accordingly, in my view, it is not a fit case where supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India should be exercised. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)