IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 10929-CAT of 2011 Date of Decision: July 4, 2011 Pramod Kumar Arya …Petitioner Versus Chandigarh Administration and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. S.S. Pathania, Advocate for the appellants. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is directed against the orders dated 30.03.2010 (P-11) and 30.06.2008 (P-4) passed by the Chandigarh Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (for brevity 'the Tribunal'). The Tribunal has merely issued direction to Rajasthan University as well as the UT Administration-respondent to consider the representation, if any, made by the petitioner. The only issue raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner in fact served Rajasthan Government and not Rajasthan University and for that he has to file application for correction of mistake in the order passed by the Tribunal. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is disposed of. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE July 4, 2011 Atul