IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11266 of 2008 BETWEEN Murikipudi Asirwadam. ... PETITIONER AND The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, Guntur and two others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. P.R. PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning the action of respondents 1 and 2 in calling the petitioner to the police station to settle the land dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he purchased an extent of Ac.0.50 cents of land from his brother viz. Ananda Rao under a registered sale deed in the year 2007. The third respondent herein is his brother’s daughter-in-law. The grievance of the petitioner is that there is strained relation between the third respondent and her parents-in-law and with an intention to grab his property, she approached the second respondent and at her instance, the petitioner is being called to the police station in the absence of registration of any crime against him. 3. The Sub Inspector of Police, Rajupalem Police Station, has filed a detailed counter wherein it is stated that the third respondent came to the police station and lodged a complaint against her father-in-law and her husband alleging that they beat her with hands. On such complaint, the entries were made in the General Diary, as the contents appeared to be non- cognizable. It is further stated that in the enquiry on the aforesaid complaint it was revealed that there are some ill feelings between the third respondent and the petitioner, but the petitioner was never summoned to the second respondent police station at any point of time. It is also stated that they never obtained the signatures of the petitioner on blank papers at any point of time, as alleged. 4. Even from a reading of the counter affidavit, it is evident that no crime is registered against the petitioner. However, as it is stated that the petitioner was never summoned to the police station, as alleged and there is no complaint pending against the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to place on record the aforesaid averments in the counter affidavit that and dispose of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of recording the aforesaid averments. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J August 18, 2011 DSK