IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-18829 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision : 05.07.2011 Kamaldeep @ Kallu ...Petitioner vs. State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Rahul Rathore, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. * * * Rajesh Bindal (J.) Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that his name was not mentioned in the FIR, however, it came only in the disclosure statement of Anil @ Nilu, co-accused but no injury has been attributed to him. He was merely shown to be present at the spot of incident. Considering the aforesaid facts, in my opinion custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. The petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on July 15, 2011 at 10.00 a.m. In case of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. He will join investigation as and when summoned by the Investigating Officer. He shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE July 5, 2011 savita