IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13392 of 2008 MANOJ KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 1.5.2008 Heard. Petitioner is an accused in a case under sections 498A and 304B read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is husband of the victim lady. Learned counsel submitted that the police during investigation did not find the case to be true and accordingly submitted final report as false and recommended for prosecution of the informant under sections 182 and 211 IPC. He submitted that the learned Magistrate after accepting final report proceeded on the protest cum complaint and took cognizance. Learned counsel further submitted that as a matter of fact the victim lady died in her naiher i.e. her father’s place and all the allegations against the petitioner are false. He then referred to paragraphs 15 and 16 of the application and submitted that many accused have been allowed bail by this Court. He also - 2 - pointed out that when the petitioner filed Chandi P.S. case no. 233/04 against the present complainant then in retaliation he filed the present case against the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely Manoj Kumar is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.D.Ray, Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa (Nalanda) in Complaint case no.434©/05. (M.Saran,J) AI