FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1299 OF 200 PETITION NO. 1299 OF 200 PETITION NO. 1299 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri G.J. Dahad for the petitioner. Shri S.R. Nargolkar AGP for Respdt. no.2. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.R.KINGAONKAR, V.R.KINGAONKAR, V.R.KINGAONKAR, JJ. JJ. JJ. DTAED: DTAED: DTAED: 2ND MARCH,2006 2ND MARCH,2006 2ND MARCH,2006. 1. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the Notification issued amending the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules. No error is pointed out in the issuance of this Notification by which the Rules are amended. All that has been done by the impugned order is licence of the petitioner is suspended till compliance with the requirement of schedule M is made. It is found by the impugned order that the defects found in the petitioner’s factory or unit are of serious nature and there is infraction of various provisions of law. The requirements were to be fullfilled by 30th June 2005. The petitioner already had six months time to do the needful. However, during that time nothing has been done. Hence impugned order has been issued. Since the impugned order is only a temporary measure till defects are removed, we see no reason to interfere. Petition is therefore dismissed. ...