1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Revision Application No.123 of 2011 (Mahadeo s/o Janglu Kamatkar v. Ashabai w/o Mahadeo Kamatkar and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri R.S. Nagpure, Advocate for Applicant. Shri S. Raisuddin, Advocate for Respondents. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 30 th November, 2011 Heard Shri Nagpure, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant; and Shri Raisuddin, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. This civil revision application challenges the order dated 7-4-2011 passed by the learned 6 th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nagpur, rejecting the application Exhibit 10 filed under Section 9A of the Civil Procedure Code for deciding the issues of valuation of the property and jurisdiction of the Court as preliminary issues. The dispute was raised before the Trial Court about valuation of the property. The respondents/plaintiffs claim that the suit land being agricultural land, has been assessed on the basis of the land revenue paid thereon and in terms of 2 Section 6(vi) and (vii) of the Bombay Court-Fees Act, 1959. The contention of the applicant/defendant is that the valuation has to be on the basis of the market value of the land in question. The Trial Court has recorded the finding after taking into consideration the oral and documentary evidence on record that the suit property is the agricultural land and the suit was required to be valued as per the provisions of Section 6(vi) and (vii) of the said Act. The contention that it is a non-agricultural land, has been rejected. There is no illegality or jurisdictional error committed by the Trial Court in passing the order. Hence, no interference is called for in the impugned order. The civil revision application is, therefore, dismissed. Judge pdl