;|UJ23 p R;C",S!T'I Sii^^liiLl^a •^tLii.'i n? THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CSSATSISGaSS W.P.NO. /SifQ /2006 yETmONEiB --y'. ^^^sFOSosm'ts Krishna Kumar Mai-idavt.Aged about 32 yrs, : S/o. Shri Bal Singh Maadavi, R/o. Vfflage Doluapara, Post Adenga, Tah. Keshkal, Distriet Bastar (CG) : •VERSUS 1] State of Chhaitisgarh, Through: Secretaiy, Tribal WeHare Deptt., D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) »" • • '. 2] CoBector, Dantewada, Disft Dakshin Bastar, Daatewada ('CG) 3] Director, panchayat and Gramiri Vifeas Viffiag, CIihattisgarh, RaipiB-, District Raipur (CG) 4] Chief E^xecutive OfEcer, Janpad PancUayat, Bhairamgarh, District Dantewada(CG) 5] Block Education OfEcer, Janpad Panchayat, Bhairamgarh, District Dantewada(CG) 6] Chief Exeeutive OlEGer, Zila Paaohayat, Dantewada, District uantewada^CQ) WRIT F»tI¥IONONDBiEf ASTICLJB 22?6/:227 OF T^ CONSTltOTiON OFTNDlA iSBI iSS 'iS^^I ISBI IN i/99i ":^^a s!» '^1 ':'^!w^f^M\ HICm COUKT OF JBDIGATUI^GHHATEBBGAM^ BII^UifURj^ Sii^eBeneh: Hon'bleStelSat^ W. P.No. 1.040 OF 3006 Petitioner : ^^^^^ K^ Versus ' .•.•:.:'•;; ,.,:-.- .' . ^' , , , RespcmdeDtS : StateofClihattis^rh& Others. ; ShrlManoj Paraajpe, couitselibrlte Slui Suiul Qtmanj^ 3paiaet lawy^^^ respondents. ORALQRDBR (24 Maarcli, 2006) 1. Thw petitiori ctiMlenges the' ^ 30.11.2005, (Annexure P-9), .passed by the respondent No.5, wbereby the OfBeer Ineiiai^ of^^^ KomaiiparEt, BlocK BKauaalgarh, beendirectedtUatfheoiderdated 20.10.2005, (Aii^ P-5), passed by the Janpad Paiichayat, ^Bhairaingarh, appoiriting'SIukslia Karl^ I • • ".:. • : .-. . • •. witIioutpennjssiontrfDJsllmct^nee^^ 2. lcanied ccnul^ fcw & petttioner' was diribjr selected ^and apppnited ^ S Kanm Grade-III, vide order dated 20.10.2005 (AmiexuFe P- 5), passed bythe resp6iidentNo.6.Tfafireafll^^^ subinittEd athe jpining report on 3.12.2005, (Aimexure P-8). Leaii]^ ^counset lias^further^^^^s^ hadjpmfidfflicdittiespn 3.12.2005, itselE- 3^ Tlie petitiDilffr^^^^w^ •'..•.-••.•-•'.'' •••• -••"'''.• '••'••: '''•''•''.'-.• • "-•....'•;:'''^. .'• " .'.'. • i:. •• .•• • • '• ' ' -' '•'•,:' . .•'-'.'• '-. ^ • -.••: a^proeess appailil^^ GanceUed. It is fuifher conliended. tfaat fhe petitionjer has adt :^% , ^< 13S;.t"'' VsSsfi»i laa ^ Tecejved airy wTitten uifiirmatiou as yet about eanccllatjpn offhe selection proceedings, orhis appointment. 4. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe respondcuts No. 1, 2 and 3, submits fhat the petitkuier has never joiiied pursuant to his selection and appointoaent as Shifcsha K^ as fhe Aimexure P-8 is the application made liy fhe petitioner to fhe Chief Bxecutive Officer, Jaapad panchayat, Bhau-amgaFU, fbr hisjmniTig.It was furftrer subiiutted that siace the entire sclection.proceeduigs have bcen quashed and new sclectk»nprocess has been uutiated, fhe petitioner does npt bave any nght to fhe appointmeQt. 5/ Be thatas it may, leaiaed couiiselforthe petitibnersubmits that the petitiDnerh^ made a representatiori, (Armexure P- 11) to the Secrefaiy Schediiled Caste, Schedi.iled Tribe and Backmaid Glasses, Welfare Departiaeat, Goverument of Chhattisgai-h, •thcrefore, the respondents may be directed to deeide the said represeritation within a stipulated period, 6. Having heard leamed counsel for the parties, in the facts aad circumstances ofthe case, fhe respondents aBe directed tb consider and decide the repTeseitfatioit (Arinexure P-ll)^, in accprdance wifh law,'wifhi^ • fhe dateofreeeipt/pIxxlTK'tionofcopyOfthisorder. 7. Iu vic'w of foregojhg, fhis petitibir stands disposed o£No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri |^ Judge |a G^^