IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1645 of 2007 SHALIGRAM PANDEY, S/O LATE KALI PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SALEMPUR,P.S.MUFASSIL, DISTRICT-GAYA. -PETITIONER Versus 1. MD.SHAKIR, S/O LATE ABDUL RAZAK, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BHUSUNDA, P.S. NAURANGA, P.S. MUFASSIL, DISTRICT-GAYA. 2. MD. GAUHAR ALI, S/O ABDUL KUDUS, R/O VILLAGE-AKBARPUR, P.S. MAKHDUMPUR, DISTRICT JEHANABAD AT PRESENT R/O MOHALLA-G.B.ROAD, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT-GAYA. -PLAINTIFFS/OPP.PARTIES IST SET 3. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH COLLECTOR, GAYA, -DEFENDANT/OPP.PARTY IIND SET 4. THE ANCHAL ADHIKARI, MANPUR ANCHAL, DISTRICT-GAYA. 2 04.03.2010 Learned counsel for the petitiuoner, Mr. Gaurav Govind, submits that the Title Suit no.18 of 2005 / 246 of 2005 has already been disposed of. It is submitted that the Civil Revision arises out of an order passed in the aforesaid Title Suit. In that view of the matter, it is submitted that the Civil Revision has become infructuous. As a result this Civil Revision is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, this order shall not come into the way 2 of the petitioner if he seeks any other remedy which is available to him under law. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) AAhmad