1 CRI.APPEAL NO.323/2010 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 3. APEAL/323/2010 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [Criminal] V/S DNYANOBA PIRAJI SAMUKHRAO AND ORS -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. V.D.Godbharle, APP for appellant. ... CORAM: A.H.JOSHI AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATE:SEPT., 15th, 2011 1. Heard learned A.P.P. 2. It was a case of charge under Sections 363 and 366-A read with Section 34 of IPC. 3. The basic point involved in this petition is the age of the prosecutrix. Version of the father of the complainant and ossification test is against the prosecution in which the age of the proxecutrix is shown to be between 18 to 20 years. On this sole ground, appeal has no merits. 4. Appeal is dismissed. (A.R.JOSHI) (A.H.JOSHI) JUDGE JUDGE agp/323-10cr.a