AB 1044/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI This is an application made under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail by the petitioners, namely, 1. Md. Nur Hussain Ali, 2. Md. Unus Ali, 3. Md . Mannaf Ali, 4. Md. Hasan Ali, 5. Md. Saru Ali @ Sanu Ali, 6. Md. Alauddin Ahme d @ Bhadu Ali, 7. Md. Ayub Ali, 8. Anowar Hussain @ Lelu Ali @ Babu and 9. Md. R ahil Ali @ Rahim Ali, in connection with Mukalmua Police Station Case No. 175/20 10, under Sections 120(B)/147/148/149/353/324/325/307 IPC. Perused the above application and materials on record. Pursuant to the o rder, dated 20-05-2011, the Officer-in-Charge, Mukalmua Police Station is presen t with the relevant case diary. Perused the relevant case diary. Heard Mr. HRA Choudhury, learned Senior counsel for the petitioners, and Ms. A Begum, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. The prayer for pre-arrest bail made by the petitioners was rejected by o rder, dated 04-03-2011, passed in AB No. 83 of 2011, on perusal of the case diar y. No new ground could be made out by the petitioner for their renewed prayer of pre-arrest bail. However, at the instance of the petitioners, the case diary is , once again, perused. Considering the nature of incriminating materials available in the case diary ag ainst the petitioners, this Court is of the view that, in the facts and attendin g circumstances of the present case, the petitioners cannot be given the benefit of pre-arrest bail. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the prayer for pre-arrest b ail, made by the petitioners, is hereby rejected. The personal appearing of the Officer-in-Charge, Mukalmua Police Station, is her eby dispensed with. With the above observations and directions, this petition shall stand disposed o f.