IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.743 of 2007 Durga Lal Rai Versus Dr.Ambedkar Sahkarigrih Nirman ---------------------------------- 7 3-11-2011 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and perused the office note. It appears that this civil revision application had stood dismissed as against opposite party nos. 1 to 3 and 5 to 7 and by order dated 12-4-2010 this Court directed the competency of this civil revision application in absence of opposite party nos. 1 to 3 and 5 to 7 to be considered at the time of admission. Thereafter, again the matter was taken up on 19-7-2011 and was adjourned at the instance of the petitioner. The perusal of the record as well as after hearing the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, it appears that opposite party nos. 1 to 3 and 5 to 7 are necessary parties, as they were all arrayed as defendants in the suit along with other defendants. In that view of the matter, proceeding further with this civil revision application may lead to chances of conflicting orders. This civil revision application is, accordingly, dismissed as incompetent. roy ( V. Nath, J.)