IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC No. 48 of 2011. Decided on 17th May, 2011. Pritam Chand Rana. …Petitioner. Versus Shrikant Baldi and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Lovneesh Kanwar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The grievance of the petitioner is that the judgment of this Court dated 22nd March, 2010 has not so far been complied with. At para 6 of the affidavit filed by the Director of Higher Education, it is stated as follows: “That in reply to this para, it is submitted that in view of the orders passed by this Hon’ble Court in CWP (T) No.6346 of 2008, the petitioner has been granted selection scale w.e.f. 16.8.1997 and further fixed at Rs.14940/- w.e.f. 16.8.2002 vide Directorate of Education letter No.EDN-H(8)B(7)34-1/2010-Fixation (RPS) in the month of June, 2010.” 2 2. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that thereafter the pay of the petitioner has been fixed in the selection grade as well. The petitioner submits that so far the monetary benefits have not been disbursed to him by the Government. It is made clear that in case the actual monetary benefits flowing out of the action thus taken by the second respondent are not disbursed to the petitioner within a month from today, the same shall carry interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the judgment, namely, 22nd March, 2010 and the officers responsible for the delay shall be personally liable for the same. 3. A copy of this judgment shall be forwarded to the Accountant General for appropriate action at the time of the audit. 4. The contempt petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. 5. A copy of this order, duly authenticated by the Court Master, shall be given to the learned Additional Advocate General during the course of the day. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 17th May, 2011 (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr) Judge. 3