IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2011 / 15TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 31900 of 2010(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SINDHU R.R., H.S.A.(MALAYALAM), GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, VAZHATHOPE, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN SRI.T.R.SADEESAN SMT.DHANYA CHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM-695001. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, IDUKKI-685584. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KATTAPPANA, IDUKKI-685515. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.31900/2010-J ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 5th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner was appointed through the Kerala Public Service Commission in a Panchayat School in the year 2001 as evident from Exts.P1 to P3 orders. Later, the petitioner was retrenched from service for want of sufficient divisions in the said school. Ext.P4 evidences that she was relieved from the duty. She was advised by P.S.C as H.S.A (Malayalam) as per Ext.P5 and she was appointed as per Ext.P6 order dated 05/09/2003. Now she is working in a Government School. 2. The petitioner has got a case that the break in service is not due to the fault of the petitioner and, therefore, seeking for appropriate directions in the matter, she has approached the Government by filing Ext.P7 representation. 3. The learned Government Pleader on getting instructions submitted that Ext.P7 has not been disposed of so far. Therefore, there will be a direction to the first respondent to dispose of Ext.P7 representation after hearing the petitioner and any W.P.(C). No.31900/2010 -:2:- other affected parties within a period of five months from the date of production of a copy of this Judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of the Judgment before the first respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE