IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.20048 of 2010 Date of Decision : December 01, 2011. M/s S.G.S.C. High School (Regd.) .....Petitioner versus Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Saurabh Bajaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Aggarwal, Advocate, for respondent Nos.1 & 2. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) One of the relief sought by the petitioner-School was that the remedy of appeal was rendered illusory as there was a condition of pre- deposit of 75% of the amount imposed. This Court accordingly vide order dated 11.11.2010 directed the Appellate Tribunal that the petitioner's appeal shall not be dismissed due to non-deposit of the amount. Learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record a photocopy of the order dated 15.10.2010 passed by the Employees' Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, allowing the petitioner's appeal, which is taken on record. In this view of the matter, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. December 01, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE