1 revn 379-10 jpc/- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 379 OF 2010 Kishore Shigvan .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. C. K. Pendse i/by Ms. Anjali Jadhav for the Applicant Shri S. A. Shaikh APP for Respondent State CORAM : N. D. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 17th January, 2011 P. C. 1. Heard Mr. Pendse learned Counsel for applicant and learned APP for the Respondent-State. 2. In this revision application, the applicant has impugned the order dated 3.7.2010 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge,Greater Mumbai, in Sessions Case No. 336 of 2009. The learned Additional Sessions Judge was pleased to allow the application of the applicant partly. In other words, his request for discharge has been rejected so far as the offence under Section 452 of I.P.C. is concerned. 3. Perused the impugned order. It is informed by Mr.Pendse that the case is pending before the trial Court for hearing 2 revn 379-10 on the point of charge. The hearing is contemplated under section 226 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. It is not only that the prosecution is heard but the defence is also to be heard and therefore, the applicant has an opportunity and liberty to make his submissions before the Sessions Court on all the grounds made in this application. 4. With the above observations, the Revision Application stand disposed of. ( N. D. DESHPANDE, J. )