IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1953 of 2006 AMRENDRA KUMAR PURBEY @ PAPPU PURBEY @ AMRENDRA PURBEY Versus MEENA DEVI ----------- 10 21/10/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the opposite party. The court below in its reasoned order has taken all possible pains to find out possible means of sustenance of wife, opposite party while fixing a sum of Rs. 500/- per month by way of monthly maintenance and the consolidated cost of litigation of Rs. 5,000/- in terms of section 24 of the Hindi Marriage Act. Such order of the Court below cannot be held to be illegal, much less vitiated by any jurisdictional error so as to warrant interference by this Court in exercise of its power under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code. That being so, this Court does not find any merit in this application and the same is accordingly dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha,J ) Abhay Kumar