IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25821 of 2008 1. RAVINDRA RAUT, SON OF LATE RAMCHANDRA RAUT 2. AWADHESH RAUT, SON OF SRI MUNNI RAUT 3. MUNNI RAUT, SON OF LATE CHANDESHWAR RAUT 4. MADHEHWAR RAUT, SON OF MUNNIT RAUT 5. MAHESH RAUT, SON OF AWAD RAUT 6. LAKHAN RAUT, SON OF MOHAN RAUT 7. RAMASHISH SHARMA @ SIPAHI SHARMA, SON OF GANAURI SHARMA. ALL ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – MURHARA KALI MATTH, P.S. SAKURABAD, DISTT. JEHANABAD. ------ PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2. 05.05.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners are aggrieved with the order dated 17.6.2008 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge Cum FTC No. 4, Jehanabad, in Sessions Trial No. 195 of 2004 by which it has allowed examination of two witnesses under Section 311 Cr. P.C. It has been submitted that the prosecution case was closed on 6.2.2008 whereafter, the statement of the accused was recorded and then the application was filed for examination of the two witnesses. Since the Trial Court was of the view that the examination of two witnesses was for just decision of the case, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)