1 IN THE HICH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2825/2011 Ravikant B.Pagnis Petitioner Vs. Secretary,Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Ors. Respondents Adv.A.V.Borwankar i/b Adv.V.D.Borwankar for petitioner CORAM- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATE 19th April,2011 P.C. . Counsel for the petitioner in all fairness accepts that the relief claimed in the petition can be redressed by the Grievance Committee. He,however, submits that the fact that his grievance can be looked into by the Grievance Committee, does not create any bar to entertain the present petition. Although, we may agree with the submission of the petitioner that the remedy provided to the petitioner before the Grievance Committee can be no bar to entertain the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ,however, on the principle that the petitioner has alternate efficacious remedy , this Court would be loath to exercise the writ jurisdiction. We, therefore, dispose of this petition with liberty to the petitioner to pursue his remedy before the Grievance Committee. If such 2 application is filed , the Grievance Committee would dispose of the same expeditiously ,not later than three months from the date of institution of application by the petitioner. The petition is disposed of accordingly. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR ,J.)