{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.370 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11383 OF 2003 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4544 OF 2003 Babasaheb Sahebrao Narode and 13 others Petitioners Versus Danve D.S. & another Respondents Mr. P.A.Kullkarni, advocate for petitioners. Mr. P.M.Shah, Senior Counsel for respondents CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 30 th March, 2011 PER COURT: 1 The petitioners are alleging non observance of the directions issued by this Court in Writ Petition No.4544/2003 and4483/2003. 2 It is the contention of petitioners that there are general directions issued by this Court in respect of providing work to the casual labourers on preferential basis considering their seniority recorded in the muster rolls maintained by the department. 3 Respondents have presented an affidavit-in-reply and it has been stated that the department is trying to provide work to {2} the casual labourers considering the requirement at particular point of time. It is also contended that every care is being taken to provide work to the senior employees in preference to junior employees. It is also pointed out that about 12 contempt petitions of the similar nature were presented touching the present subject and those were disposed of with similar directions. Instant Contempt Petition also needs to be disposed of in view of the affidavit-in-reply presented by the respondents. 4 Contempt Petition stands disposed of. R.M.BORDE JUDGE adb/cp37009