THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.31917 of 2010 Dated 02nd December, 2011 Between: M/s.Chinni Wines …Petitioner And The Commissioner of Proh. & Excise, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: --- Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP for Proh. & Excise Counsel for respondent No.4: Sri V.Manohar Rao The Court made the following: ORDER: Apprehending that the oﬃcial respondents may permit respondent No.4 to shift his shop for sale of liquor under A4 licence from Pathakalva Village to Thummalagunta Village, the present writ petition is ﬁled by one of the existing A4 licensees. This Court by order, dated 20.12.2010, granted status quo with respect to the location of the shop of respondent No.4. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition & Excise, on instructions, submitted that even though respondent No.4 has earlier submitted a proposal for shifting his shop, he is no longer insisting on such shifting. In view of this submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the cause on which the writ petition is ﬁled ceases to exist. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, however, with liberty to the petitioner to avail a fresh remedy, if and when the proposal of respondent No.4 is accepted by the official respondents. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.40573 of 2010 and W.V.M.P.No.588 of 2011 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 02nd December, 2011 VGB