IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16802 of 2009 ANIRUDH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 27.01.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The appointment of the petitioner was a tenure appointment which has expired and to that extent the petitioner has no cause of action by the appointment of another. The challenge to the appointment of another as being without approval of the governing body under the rules looses its relevance in view of the subsequent approval having been granted by the governing body at its meeting held on 23.12.2009 when the initial appointment dated 26.11.2009 in an officiating capacity came to an end and the substantive appointment operates from 23.12.2009. The writ application is dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)