1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO.1790 OF 1992. WRIT PETITION NO.1790 OF 1992. WRIT PETITION NO.1790 OF 1992. Shri Tanaji Bapusaheb Pawar : Petitioner versus The Chief Executive Officer Satara Zilla Parishad, Satara : Respondents. Mr.Sandeep Pathak i/by Mr.Anturkar for the petitioner. None for the respondents. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE, J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE, J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : October 07, 2006. DATED : October 07, 2006. DATED : October 07, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This matter was heard by me earlier when advocate Mr.Anturkar argued for the petitioner. Time was given to seek instructions from his client. Today the advocate for the petitioner files a letter of his client on record. It is 2 2 2 taken on record and marked "X" Colly. for identification. In view of this letter, the petition does not survive and it has become infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. Ad interim order, if any, stands vacated. [D.G.DESHPANDE, J.] [D.G.DESHPANDE, J.] [D.G.DESHPANDE, J.]