iiIG‘i-i COUR’I‘ OF CHHA‘I‘TISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Apnea‘l No.21 §LZUO8 DB' HON’BLE $HRI SUNIL KUMAR blNHA {is nwgr E My; 'r D eupwm WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 OF THE CHHA‘1“I‘18GARH int: n 9 an...“ sin-1 Pailav Mishra, counsel for the appellant. Slalt? . shn‘ Kishore Bhadurit, Addin‘onal Advocafe General for the u u H Cgw, a 205. AP?ELLANT Mohan. Lal Gupta, S/o Shri DE’I‘I'I‘TI‘FI‘HE‘ Tikaram Gupta, age“ bc‘at 49 veals, Sub Engineer q I: ($2; M), R er, R Sub Divism, 13mg (c v \ Versus REgPONDEN‘I‘S State 01‘ Chnatu‘sgarn, Through tbs Sscmtaxy, Department 01 Water Resources, D.I{.S. Bhav 11, Magtralaya, Ralp‘ur (C. G.) 2 Shn‘ Dilip Wasnekar Addmonai Qeereta‘ ’ Gcvt cf ChLuvmar" Water Resources Department D.K.S‘ Bhavazl, Mantrala 'a, Raipur {mun} 3 Shn‘ KL. Sahu, Executive Engineer {E&M) R&R, Burg {C.G.) 4 Shn R S Asiwal 1n charge, S n r‘ “:‘MW R&m, Burg (CG) 5 Coilector’ Durg, District Durg’ (C.G.) 2 W.A. N0.Z’73/ZUUS 419.12.2éos} Foliowmg order of the Court was passgd by gunil Kumar Sinha, J”: Heard. Learned counsel for the appelxant seeks permission to withdmwn mls Writ Appeal. ‘ 7 Judge. ff s i3 ;\‘ Permission granted. The Writ Appeal is dismissed, as Withdrawn. Sd/_ m “ Sunil Kumar Sinha ; Sd/— Judge i '11P Sharma‘