IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18430 of 2009 ALOK KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STAE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02 05.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner, an Assistant Clerk in the office of the Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department fairly acknowledges that he is under suspension. The grievance is that he has made an application on 13.10.2009 for sanction of Rs.65,000/- from his G.P.F. non-refundable amount as he is in dire need of money because of the academic compulsions of his son studying in Maulana Azad Engineering and Technology, Anishabad. He has submitted a reminder on 22.10.2009 also. The refusal of the respondents to even consider the application has compelled the filing of the writ application in mid-December, 2009. Counsel for the State prays for time to seek instructions. No useful purpose shall be served by keeping this writ application pending. Directions are given to dispose off the petitioner’s application for grant of the aforesaid amount within a maximum period of three weeks 2 from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in accordance with law. This Court further directs that the order disposing the representation must also discuss the reasons why, for what is purely an administrative issue of entitlement or disentitlement in accordance with Rules, the respondent authorities have slept over the matter generating an wholly frivolous litigation burdening this Court unnecessarily. The application stands disposed in the aforesaid terms. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)