IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14415 of 2007 Indu Kumari, Wife of Dinesh Ram, Resident of Village Rajan, P.S. Sirdala, District Nawada. ------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Secretary, Department of Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Director, Department of Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. District Magistrate, Nawada. 5. Deputy Development Commissioner, Nawada. 6. District Welfare Officer, Nawada. 7. Child Development Project Officer, Sirdala, in the District of Nawada. 8. Mukhiya, Rajan Gram Panchayat, Sirdalla, Nawada. 9. Secretary, Rajan Gram Panchayat, Sirdala, Nawada. 10. Bebi Kumari, Wife of Bijay Rajbanshi, Resident of Village Rajan, P.S. Sirdala, District Nawada, presently working as Anganbari Sevika at Centre no.2 (East Rajan) in village Rajan, P.S. Sirdala, District Nawada. -------- Respondents ----------- 2 18.12.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows:- “1(i) For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari of quashing the letter dated 13-5- 2007 issued under the signature of respondent Mukhiya and Secretary, Gram Panchayat no.10 has been selected as Anganbari Sevika for Centre no.2 (East Rajan), village Rajan, P.S. Sirdala, district Nawada. (ii) For further commanding the respondents that after cancellation of appointment of respondent no.10 as Anganbari Sevika, petitioner be appointed 2 on her place as Anganbari Sevika at Anganbari Centre no.2 (East Rajan) in village Rajan, P.S. Sirdala, District Nawada.” With reference to the aforementioned reliefs, counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner intends to move the Collector of the District by filing a compact representation. In the opinion of this court, recourse chosen by the petitioner seems to be correct inasmuch as the scheme for appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika itself envisages the redressal of grievance pertaining to selection/appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika in the first instance by the Collector of the District. That being so, this court would give liberty to the petitioner to file a compact representation which, if filed along with this order, will be disposed within the time limit fixed by the State Government in the Circular dated 10.12.2009 by a reasoned order after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, respondent no. 10 and the representative of concerned gram panchayat. 3 With the aforementioned observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)