1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 277 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 277 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 277 OF 2006 Mrs. Sunita I.K. Lamba ... Petitioner Versus The Education Inspector, Secondary Divsion, & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Sunil Dighe for Petitioner. Mr. M More, A.G.P. for Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : MARCH 20, 2006 DATED : MARCH 20, 2006 DATED : MARCH 20, 2006 P.C. . It is the case of the Petitioners that various amounts are being sought to be deducted from the pensionary benefits to which the Petitioner is entitled to, without the authority of Law. Even though the representations have been made, the same have not yet been decided till date. . Considering the controversy, the petition can be disposed of by issuing the following directions : (1) The Petitioner to make a fresh representation to Respondent No. 1 within two weeks from today 2 representing her grievances. The respondent No. 1 after hearing the petitioner and Respondent No. 4 to decide the same by a speaking order within six weeks from the receipt of the representation. . Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)