IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2630 of 2011 Ashwani Kumar Singh SON OF LATE MAHESHWARI SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GHOSHPUR, P.S. HAWELI KHARAGPUR, MUNGER Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors . ----------- 2 05/07/2011 Reliance by the learned counsel for the petitioner on annexures 3 and 4 which are decisions taken by the State Government on extending the cut off date of such daily wagers who are engaged and their removal as well as their regularization cannot be adopted or applied to the case of the petitioner because admitted position is that way back in the year 1981 the respondents stopped taking work from him. This fact is not denied. If that be so, then a person who has not been in any kind of employment in any capacity or associated with the State for the last 30 years cannot be considered for regularization merely because the Government has come up with some circular in the year 2004-2005 trying to put their house in order. There has to be some co-relation to the time frame when the cause of action arose and the time or occasion when such claim is being made by an - 2 - employee. The Court can only express sympathy with the petitioner but cannot make any declaration in his favour after three decades of the claim being made. In the above stated circumstance, no writ, therefore, in his favour can be issued. This writ application is dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)