1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2850/2010 Subhash Saxena vs Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitaran Nitam Ltd. DATE OF ORDER : 22.3.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA,J. Mr. Dhanesh Sarswat, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The contention of the petitioner is that he was suspended vide order dated 4.1.2007 and criminal case is pending against him. According to him, it is a case of prolong suspension. It is submitted that no departmental inquiry has been initiated against the petitioner by the department itself. It is also submitted that petitioner submitted a representation and prayed for revocation of the suspension order dated 4.1.2007, but that has not been decided and, therefore, a direction may be issued to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner. Since there is short relief claimed by the petitioner which is about the consideration of his representation, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner, copy of which may be supplied again alongwith copy of this order to the respondents. The representation will be decided strictly in accordance with the norms of the 2 respondents within a period of one months from the date of receipt of copy of this order and copy of the representation dated 18.1.2010. (PRAKASH TATIA),J. cpgoyal/-