BA-846-11.sxw 1 Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.846 OF 2011 Hiraman @ Takya Pandurang Gumbade ... Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra, Thru' Satpur Police Station ... Respondent Mr. R.N. Gite for the Applicant. Mr. K.V. Saste, APP, for the Respondent. CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 25 TH JULY, 2011. P.C. : 1. Advocate for the Applicant is absent. Heard Mr. Saste, the learned APP for the Respondent. 2. The learned APP, on instructions from the Investigating Officer, who is present in Court, states that the trial is nearing completion, and that all the prosecution witnesses have been examined. I find that the Applicant has been named in the F.I.R. 3. At this stage, Mr. Gite, the learned Advocate for the Applicant, appears and states that he has no instructions as to whether the trial is nearing BA-846-11.sxw 2 Dixit completion. However, PSI (Smt.) D.S. Patil, the representative of the Investigating Officer, categorically states that the witnesses have been examined and even the Investigating Officer has been examined. 4. Under the circumstances, I am not inclined to release the Applicant on bail. 5. The Bail Application is rejected. [A.M. THIPSAY, J.]