IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3499 of 2011 1. Satyanarayan Yadav son of late Tanuklal Yadav, resident of village Bathnaha P.S. Phulparas, Distt. Madhubani. 2. Parshuram Paswan, son of Sri Ram Narayan Paswan, resident of Belmohan P.S. Phulparas, Dist. Madhubani 3. Ram Narayan Ram son of late Tetar Ram, resident of Village Bathnaha P.S. Phulparas, Dist. Madhubani. 4. Nityanand Jha, son of late Jeevnath Jha, resident of village Belmohan P.S. Phulparas, Distt. Madhubani. 5. Jeevachh Ram son of Sri Chitlal Ram, resident of village Mansapur, P.S. Laukahi Distt. Madhubani. ………….Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Primary Education, Human Resource Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Superintendent of Education, Madhubani. 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Darbhanga. 5. The Block Development Officer, Phulparas, Madhubani. 6. The Block Development Officer, Laukahi Dist. Madhubani. 7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Tardih, Darbhanga 8. The Block Education Extension Officer, Phulparas, 9. The Pramukh, Tardih Panchayat Samiti, Dist. Darbhanga 10. The Pramukh, Phulparas Panchayat Samiti, Dist. Madhubani. 11. The Block Teachers Selection Committee, Phulparas, Madhubani. 12. The District Superintendent of Education, Supaul. 13. The Block Development Officer, Marauna, Belhi, District Supaul. 14. The Block Education Extension Officer, Marauna, Belhi, District Supaul. ……Respondents. ----------- 2. 21.09.2011 Heard Mr. Kirpanand Jha learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.C. to G.P. 21 for the State and its functionaries. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inspite of a clear cut direction in C.W.J.C. No. 10996 of 2011 by order dated 13.07.2011 to complete the formalities with regard to appointment of the petitioners, the same is 2 being impeded due to the fact that some of the official respondents have taken the plea that they were not a formal party in the writ proceeding and as such they were not bound by such direction. This stand of the concerned respondents is untenable and may have entailed passing of strict order against them. However, by way of indulgence this Court does not propose to do the same. However, to make things clear and ensure that the order is complied with, let the authorities as named in paragraph No. 7 of the present application be impleaded as respondents No. 12 to 14 i.e. the District Superintendent of Education, Supaul, the Block Development Officer, Marauna, Belhi, District Supaul and the Block Education Extension Officer, Marauna, Belhi, District Supaul. Accordingly, such respondents shall be equally bound by the directions given in order dated 13.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 10996 of 2011. This M.J.C. application stands disposed off. Saif/- (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)