IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.959 of 2011 MURARI AGRWAL, SON OF RATAN LAL AGRAWAL, R/0 TELYA POKHAR, P.S.-BEGUSARAI TOWN, DISTRICT-BEGUSARAI. …………Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 11.01.2011 Heard learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 28.10.2010 in a case registered under Section 457, 380 and 411of the I.P.C. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that after breaking the lock of the informant’s house gold and silver jewellery along with licensed rifle and ten cartridges of .315 bore kept in almirah were stolen. Learned Sessions Judge has rejected the bail of the petitioner on the ground that para-70 of the case diary reflects the recovery of rifle from the possession of the petitioner and one Bhola Paswan. Learned counsel submits that para-70 of the case diary reflects recovery of the pistol from the petitioner which is not the stolen item and for which one separate case has been lodged. Though stolen rifle was 2 recovered from Bhola Paswan, the petitioner has been implicated because he performed inter caste love marriage with one local girl. Considering the aforesaid submission, let learned court below verify from para 70 of the case diary and if the rifle has not been found from the possession of the petitioner then the petitioner will released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Begusarai in connection with Begusarai Town P.S. Case No.346 of 2009. PN (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)