ITR/52/1998 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 52 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Sd/- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED Sd/- ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? NO 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? NO 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? NO 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? NO 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? NO ========================================================= TRISUN CHEMICAL IND.P.LTD. - Applicant(s) Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MRS SWATI SOPARKAR for Applicant(s) : 1, MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent(s) : 1, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED Date : 22/04/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA) 1 Mrs. Swati Soparkar, learned Advocate has filed a note for withdrawal of the name of the Advocate ITR/52/1998 2/2 JUDGMENT stating therein that she has not filed Vakalatnama, and furthermore having tried to contact the assessee-applicant there is no response. 2 In the circumstances, the name of the learned Advocate be deleted in absence of any Vakalatnama on record. 3 The Reference is of 1998. Despite service there is no appearance, nor has any Paper book been filed by the assessee-applicant. In the circumstances, the Reference is returned unanswered for want of prosecution and stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (D.A.Mehta, J.) Sd/- (Z.K.Saiyed, J.) M.M.BHATT