IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35380 of 2010 PAWAN PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Allegedly, petitioner and other co-accused kidnapped the informant’s minor daughter. It would appear from Annexure-3, statement of victim recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. that the victim returned to her home safely and her statement was recorded. The victim has specifically stated in her statement that she does not want to live with the petitioner. The victim has nowhere narrated the incident of kidnapping said to be committed by the petitioner. The contention of Learned counsel for the petitioner is that as a matter of fact, the victim was voluntarily solemnized her marriage with the petitioner which is evident from perusal of Annexure-2 , the application for marriage registration. Learned counsel for the petitioner also points out that the victim was also present before the learned Sessions Judge but she did not make any complain against the petitioner before the learned Sessions Judge. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed. In 2 the event of arrest/surrender within 30 days from receipt of the order, the petitioner, Pawan Prasad shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Thawe P.S. Case No. 41 of 2009 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)