C.R. No. 7619 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7619 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 5.1.2011 Baljit Kaur ......Petitioner Versus Shinda .......Respondent ********* CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present : Mr. Saurav Khurana, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** SABINA, J. Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution for setting aside the order dated 27.5.2010 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ajnala vide which an application under order 38 Rule 5 of Civil Procedure Code (in short 'CPC') has been dismissed. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves dismissal. Petitioner filed an application seeking maintenance from respondent. During the pendency of the said petition, an application was filed under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC. A perusal of the impugned order reveals C.R. No. 7619 of 2010 (O&M) 2 that respondent placed on record a compromise dated 6.7.2007 entered between the parties. As per the said compromise petitioner had got remarried and had also taken along her minor children. As per the compromise, petitioner had stated that she had no claim against the respondent as the matter between the parties has been settled. In these circumstances, the learned trial Court had rightly dismissed the application filed by the petitioner under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC. Hence, no ground warranting interference by this Court is made out. Dismissed. (SABINA) JUDGE January 5, 2011 Anand