IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7902 of 2011 PRADEEP KUMAR @ PRADEEP THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner alleged to be the husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 323/498A and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the D. P. Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the marriage was performed with a girl which was not shown prior to the marriage and for that a case has been filed for dissolution of the marriage. The petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 1000/- per month from April, 2011 by depositing the same in the account of the informant from the second week of every month in the account of the informant. The aforesaid payment will have no bearing on the merits of the case between the parties and will subject to any order being passed in the matrimonial or maintenance 2 proceeding. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Parihar P.S. Case No. 118 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is expected that the learned counsel for the informant will furnish the account number of the informant to the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)