IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 21ST KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 14620 of 2008(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- PERUVANNUR.E.K.AMMED HAJI, EYYAMKODE AMSOM, KAKKATTIL DESOM, KALLACHI PO., VATAKARA TALUK,KOZHIKODE BY ADV. SRI.K.V.SOHAN SMT.SREEJA SOHAN.K. SRI.VINEETH KURIAKOSE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SECRETARY,NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PO.KALLACHI,VATAKARA,KOZHIKODE. 2. CHERIYAVALLERI THAZHAKUNIYIL KUNHALI, KURUNNANKANDI, THZHEKUNIYIL, EYYAMKODE, KAKKATTIL, KALLACHI PO.,VATAKARA , KOZHIKODE PIN.673506. 3. CHERIYAVALLERI THAZHAKUNIYIL AYOOB, DO ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNAN FOR R2 & 3 SRI.R.PARTHASARATHY FOR R2 & 3 SRI.C.VALSALAN FOR R1 SRI.K.RAKESH ROSHAN FOR R1 SMT.THUSHARA.V FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: W.P.C.NO. 14620/2008 ------------------------------------------------------------------ EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DT. 25-1-2008. EXT.P2 ORDER IN I.A.354/08 IN O.S.74/08 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, NADAPURAM DT. 11-4-2008. EXT.P3 APPLICATION DT. 28-4-2008. [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE. S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 14620 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 12th November, 2008. J U D G M E N T The petitioner filed this writ petition stating that respondents 2 and 3 have forcefully taken possession of a shop room which was in the possession of the petitioner and is conducting meat trade therein without a licence. In respect of the dispute in respect of the shop room between the petitioner and respondents 2 and 3, a suit is pending before the Munsiff's Court, Nadapuram as O.S.No. 74/2008. The petitioner's only prayer in this writ petition is that respondents 2 and 3 shall not conduct any business in the shop room in question without appropriate licence issued by the 1st respondent. 2. I had passed an interim order in this writ petition on 3-10- 2008 as follows: “There would be a direction to the first respondent to see that nobody conducts any business in the shop room in question namely, shop room No. NP-IX/818 A8 of Kallachi Market Shopping Complex without any valid licence issued by the Panchayat, in the name of the person conducting the business.” The inter se dispute between the petitioner and respondents 2 and 3 has to be sorted out in the suit pending. However, respondents 2 and 3 cannot validly conduct any business in the shop room without obtaining a licence issued in their name by the 1st respondent. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the interim order. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/