KBP 1 WPL1730-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1730 OF 2010 Gunwant Purushottam Waghela ....Petitioner Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others ....Respondents -- Mr.S.K.Sthalekar, for petitioner. Ms.K.R.Punjabi, for BMC. Mr.B.V.Phadnis i/b.Mr.G.D.Utangale, for respondent nos.2 and 3. Ms.Uma Palsule-Desai, AGP for respondent no.4. -- CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 8 th APRIL, 2011 P.C: Heard learned counsel for petitioner. We have also heard learned counsel for respondent. 2] The basic grievance of the petitioner is that he is the heir of Maniben; and his two sisters, by suppressing the fact the petitioner and his brother are heirs of Maniben, have taken compensation and alternative accommodation from respondent no.1 – Corporation in respect of Final Plot No.522-K, TPS V, situate at Vile Parle East, Mumbai, which is acquired by KBP 2 WPL1730-10.sxw the Corporation under the M.R. & T.P. Act. 3] In our opinion, this is a dispute between the members of family. It is not possible for us to deal with it in writ jurisdiction. If any remedy of suit or any other remedy is available to the petitioner in law, the petitioner will be free to adopt it, if he is so advised. The Court which is seized with the proceedings that may be filed by the petitioner, shall deal with independently in accordance with law. Writ Petition is disposed of. [R.G.KETKAR, J.] [SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.]