IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.33813 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 11, 2011 Janak Raj @ Jang ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.R.S.Athwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has been summoned as an additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for offences under Section 302 and 498-A IPC. Counsel for the petitioner has drawn my attention to a report of the Doctor, which was contrary to the dying declaration. Dying declaration was recorded before the Magistrate. It is for the trial Court to see the value and the worth of the dying declaration. It is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. The petitioner, however,may surrender and apply for regular bail, which shall be considered in the background that the petitioner has now been added as an additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. Dismissed. November 11, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE