IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2011 / 17TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 17043 of 2011(E) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- ABDULREHMANKUTTY, S/O.MOHAMMED KUNJU, AGED 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT TC 15/2004, DWARAKA, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY HIS SON AND POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER ASHRAF, S/O.ABDULREHMAN KUTTY,RESIDING AT TC 15/2004, DWARAKA, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI.V.SURESH, SRI.G.SUDHEER. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,SECRETRIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001. 2. DIRECTOR OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, DIRECTORATE OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, KESAVADASAPURAM, PATTOM PALACE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001. 3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KADAPPANAKKUNNU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001. 4. ENGLISH INDIA CLAYS LTD, AS COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT VELI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001. R1 TO R3 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.17043/2011-E: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY NO.151/2011 DTD. 04/05/2011 EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE DEED NO.2746/68 DTD. 30/04/1968 OF POTHENCODE SRO. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER'S WIFE BEFORE THE R.2. DTD. 16/09/2010. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER'S WIFE BEFORE THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVANANANTHAPURAM DTD. 13/11/2010. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE COMPALINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER'S WIFE BEFORE THE THAHSILDAR, THIRUVANANANTHAPURAM DTD. 13/11/2010. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).17043/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 8th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition giving liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court, if the need arises in future. Permission is granted. Writ petition is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs