IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 29th day of January, 2008 First Bail Application No. 80 of 2008. Criminal Side Brijpal @ Birju, S/o Chhote, R/o Dhariwala, P.S. Pathari, District Haridwar. ………..Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ……….Opposite Party. Arising out of Crime No. 294 of 2007. Under Secrtions: 364, 304/34, 201, 120-B, I.P.C., P.S.: Kotwali Laksar, District: Haridwar. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard Smt. Pushpa Joshi, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri G.S. Sandhu, learned Government Advocate for the Stare. Applicant Brijpal @ Birju, who is in jail in connection with Crime No. 294 of 2007, relating to offences punishable under Sections 364, 304/34, 201, 120-B, I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Laksar, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail. The First Information Report is delayed one. It is a case of circumstantial evidence. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the lead body is said to have been found at the instance of other co-accused (not the applicant). Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail. Let the applicant Brijpal @ Birju be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Vacation Judge Dt. 29.01.2008 NS