HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. PETITIQNER RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)No. 3966 of 2007 H.P. Gupta, aged about 67 years, S/o. U. Shri R.P. Gupta, Partner M/s. Asian Builders & Traders, Occupation - Contractorship, R/o. C-17, Commercial Comptex, T.P. Nagar, Nehru Chowk, Korba, District - Korba (C.G.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Public Worte Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department ( B & R), Korba Division, Korba (C.G.) Writ Petition Under Article 226 ofthe Constitutionof India Present: Shri Sudhir Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri U.N.S. Deo, leamed Govemment Advocate for the State/ respondents. OR^D^R (23ro March, 2009) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri U.N.S. Deo, learned Government Advocate has raised a preliminary objection about the maintainability of the writ petition in view of the arbitration clause in the agreement. .-.J- s=SS-^s2: ^^^^^^^^^W^^s A. 2. Shri Sudhir Verma, teamed counsel for the petitioner, in view of the above preliminary objection, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty of availing the other remedies which may be available to the |ietftioner under the relevant provisions of law and the clause of the agreement. 3. Permission granted. 4. With the above liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn______„ i SdA Sunil Kumar Sinha Sd/- j Judge ChiefJustice nimmj