CWP No.2023 of 2007.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.2023 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.01.2010 **** Hans Raj . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab and others . . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. B.S. Chahal, DAG Punjab ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). Learned State counsel states that the petitioner has been offered appointment to the post of Headmaster vide appointment letter dated 14th January, 2010, a Photostat copy whereof, has been handed over to counsel for the petitioner also. (2). In this view of the matter, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. CWP No.2023 of 2007.doc - 2 – (3). Needless to say that the seniority dispute of the petitioner, if any, vis-à-vis private respondents shall be resolved separately and in the event of acceptance of seniority claim of the petitioner, the same shall be granted on notional basis without any monetary benefits. (4). Ordered accordingly. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 20.01.2010 vishal shonkar