& ^/ 1V-S IN THE HIGH COURT OF' JUDICATURE CHHATTK AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. a°i35' / 2005 ^^ ^^ 'y/^ ^y 1) 2) 3) <.^' <?'/ •/ Manaklal Rampuria, S/o Late Shri Deepchand Rampuria, Aged about 67 years, R/o Gudhiyari, Rarapuria Niwas, Gosai Bada, Raipur (C.G.) Versus State of Chhattisgarh: Through the Secretary, Urban Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Municipal Corporation Raipur- Through its Coinraissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.) Raipur Development Authority - Through its Chief Executive Officer, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERA_RTICLE 226/227 QFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 w v -22 3I1^?TqiT i^IR; 311^1 aiiii'i.Rflfttr '"IV ^ act ^, -•> <s .' 1 :••- ^ 'fSI ^IFTRTT, ®'rfiti'IS,(Sldl'My .^.^^S.IQC -c-' sn^Trewrwdw 18.7,20QS Shri P. Diwakar, Sr, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Parag Kotecha, Pa Shri Pankaj Agarwal; ct>unsel for respondent Nos.2 86 3. \ Heard. . With the consent of 1 petition is being disposed df on the same terms of order dated 4.3.2005 passed by this Cou|rt in W.P. No.2082/04. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of •iil allowed to make a detailed and grievances to the RDA v^ petitioner within two month^ in an objective manner coni RDA's policy decision the p exchage of land of the petiti consider the clairn of pet preferable, if available, in : the petitioner. In case, parti »bi'!;Fci4l-ft<iic)T ff tecat <l°reeR ^aTl^iTsn^l Advocate with Shri P.R. Patankar, nel Lawyer for respondent No. 1. arned counsel for t.he parties, .this •ith a direction that the petitioner is representation raising all his points ithin a period of ten days from today and in turn, the RDA shajll decide the representation of the from the date of receipt of the same idering all the points raised by the petitioner. If the RDA reach^es to the conclusion that in view of btitioner is entitled for 40% land in oner already acquired, then they can itioner for allotment of 40% land [ndira Gandhi Commerical Complex, Devendra Nagar, Raiur.or a^iy other land which is acceptable to [;ular land is not available, then RDA can consider the allotment c^f other land in consultation with the petitioner. i Consequently, M.(W.)FJ. No.2473/05 8s I.A. No.5804/05 also stand disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- I-.C. Bhadoo ic