1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.03.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD).No.2493 of 2011 B.Alagu Varalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police Theni District Theni 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police District Crime Branch Theni District, Theni 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Theni Town Police Station Theni 4. The Inspector of Police Theni Town Police Station Theni ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the second respondent to file final report in Crime No. 7 of 2005 at the earliest point of time. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Mohideen Basha For Respondents : Mr.L.Murugan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to file final report in Crime No. 7 of 2005 at the earliest point of time. 2. Heard Mr.N.Mohideen Basha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.L.Murugan, learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner has preferred complaints to the first respondent on 17.05.2003, 17.06.2003, 10.07.2003 and 18.12.2003 and since the complaints were not registered, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing a Petition in Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 642 of 2005 and this Court had passed an order dated 01.02.2005, directed the respondents to investigate the matter and register the complaints. He would further submit in his argument that the respondents registered a case and the final report has also been filed by the then District Crime Branch to the effect of referring the case as 'mistake of fact'. He would further submit in his argument that aggrieved by the same, the petitioner once again approached this Court by fililng another petition in Crl.O.P.No. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 8211 of 2006 and this Court after detailed examination of the case diary and the investigating officer, directed the first respondent to transfer the case to some other officer for re-investigation, but no action has been taken by the first respondent. Therefore, he would request the Court that a direction may be issued to the second respondent to complete the investigation and to file a final report in Crime No. 7 of 2005. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit in his argument that on the complaint given by the petitioner, a case has been registered in Crime No.7 of 2005 and the investigation is already over and the final report was filed to the effect of referring the case as 'mistake of fact'. 5. Considering the submissions made by both sides, this Court is inclined to record the submissions of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) and to direct (*)fourth respondent to investigate the case in Crime No. 7 of 2005 as expeditiously as possible and to file a final report, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if the charge sheet has not been filed. 6. With the abovesaid direction, this Petition is disposed of. Sd/- 01.03.2011 (*)Corrected as per of this Court dated 27.04.11 in Crl.OP(MD)No.2493/11 Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To To be substituted to the order already despatched on 16.03.11 in Crl.OP.NO.2493/11 1. The Superintendent of Police Theni District, Theni 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police District Crime Branch, Theni District, Theni 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Theni Town Police Station, Theni 4. The Inspector of Police Theni Town Police Station, Theni 5. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai +1cc to Mr.N.Mohideen Basha, Advocate SR.No.15580 Vsg SR : 10.03.2011 : 2p/6c Crl.O.P.(MD).No.2493 of 2011 01.03.2011 PA/29.04.2011/2P/7C(IT) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/