1 WP 2326/2011 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2326 OF 2011 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr. Rajesh S. Datar for the petitioners. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATE : 6TH JUNE 2011 P.C. : 1. The trial Court as well as the lower appellate Court have concurrently held that the petitioners (original plaintiffs) have failed to prove their possession over the suit property and have also failed to prove that they have any legal right in the property. These finding are essentially findings of fact which are not shown to be perverse. In the circumstances, in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the 2 WP 2326/2011 Constitution of India, these findings cannot be interfered with. Hence, the writ petition is rejected summarily. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)