Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.18863 of 2008 Dated 27th July, 2011 Between: M/s Apex Encon Projects Pvt Ltd., Reptd by its Manager-Kuna Pentan Naidu …Petitioner And The Commissioner, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District and another. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Ms V.Karuna Kumari, representing Sri Addepalli Suryanarayana Counsel for respondent No.1 : Sri N.Ranga Reddy, SC for Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority Counsel for respondent No.2 : Sri R.Sambasiva Pratap The Court made the following: Order: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief:- “To issue a writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent pertaining to endorsement BPS/Zone-II/WARD No.8/Sl.No.2409, dated 23.08.2008 (served on 28.08.2008) for removal of stair case in Plot No.51, HIG, MVP Colony, Visakhapatnam and quash the same holding it as illegal and consequentially direct the first respondent to receive the returned BPS application No. BPS/Zone-II/WARD No.8/Sl.No.2409, dated 23.08.2008 and regularise the minor setbacks including the staircase” At the hearing, Ms V.Karuna Kumari, learned counsel representing Sri Addepalli Suryanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that as the action for demolition of the structure raised by respondent No.2 was taken on 17.06.2008, the cause of action in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. In view of the above submission, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, the order, dated 29.08.2008, passed in W.P.M.P.No.24565 of 2008 is vacated and the said W.P.M.P and W.V.M.P.No.2226 of 2009 are disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 27th July, 2011 DR