W W , W , W WW...Q>.gé W 2007 3mm (W) WWWifg‘érm éisimm aged about 70 years, Rlo Amgaon. Through his son General Power of Attorney Holder Kushal Ram Sahu, S/o Alakh Ram Sahu, aged about 40 years, R/o Belergaon, Tahsil Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) I'SUS - Board of Revenue, Circuit Court, Raipur (C,G.) S‘ate of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary. Revenue. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Dinesh, S/o Mansai, R/o Amgaon, Tahsil Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari ‘g Jamuna Bai, W/o Bhunesh Gond. R/o Amgaon, Tahsil Nagri, Distt. Dhammri (C.G.) Ramesh, S/o Mansai Gond, Minor Guardian through mother Jamuna Bai. isro Kumari, Dlo Bhunesh, Minor Guardian through mother Jamuna Bai. Kritam Dhruv, Slo Bhunesh Minor Guardian through mother Jamuna Bai. Prakash Dhruv, S/o Bhunesh Minor Guardain through mother Jamuna Bai. Ali 5 to 8 are residents of Amgaon, Tahsii Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) mtmfa‘wi? m WWW RESPONDENTS: WWW WWW *v w < 9. Adesh, S/o Mansai Gond, Rlo Amgaon, Tahsi! Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (ca) {Writ petition under Article 2327 of the Constitution of india} Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice L.C. Bhadoo 1 6-1 -2008 Mr. N.K. Chatterjee, counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. Anju Ahuja. Deputy Govt. Advocate for the State/respondent No.2. Mr. R.K. Kesharwani, counsei for respondents No.3 to 9. The petitioner, who is purchaser of the land betonging to Sobh Singh, Scheduled Tribe, who h expired in March, 1977 during the pendency of litigation and whose gal heirs are responderm No.3 to 9, has preferred this writ petition un er Article 227 of the Constitution of India, questioning legality and cor ectness of the order dated 2-12-2006 passed by the Board of Revenue, rcuit Court, Raipur, in Revenue Case No.82/A-23/2003-04, whereby lear ed Board of Revenue has partly set aside the order dated 29-1 2-2003 passed by the Collector, Dhamtari in Revenue case No.75/A-23/2000—0 , whereby learned Collector set aside the order dated 31 -3-1 994 passed y the Sub Divisional Officer, Dhamtarl holding that the legal heirs of Sobh Singh are entitled for reversion and accordingly, repossession of the land. By the impugned order the oard of Revenue after hearing counsel for the parties and examination of aterial on record held that the enquiry conducted by the Upper Col r, Dhamtari was without giving opportunity to the owner of the land i.e. heirs of Sobh Singh, no i a i l o ' g EW,WW W mwm91gé/ ‘H 200% 3mm (W) hasexercised thé jurisdiction under Section 50 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Board, 1959, thereby the Board has not committed any jurisdictiona! error. The petition is therefore, liable to be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. Stay granted by this Court on 17-2-2007 stands vacated) Sd/. . ' L.C. Bhadoo a Judge Soma v , r owe/WM séwgj — @