IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.t WRIT PETITION fS) N0. &6 I'3) OF 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^ ^^' .-• ^>/,^n/ y.-\c'/ )/y^p-/' ^y /y^- 1. Setlal Ram Son of Late Shri Piruram, aged about 40 years, working on the post of Sweeper, P.H.C. Dumardeeh, C.H.C. Dhourpur, District Surguja (C.G.), VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through: the Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). ^ 2. The Director, Health Services, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Collector, Surguja (Ambikapur), District Surguja (C.G.). 4^ The Chief Medical and Health Officer, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 5. The Block Medical Officer, Community Health Centre, Dhourpur, District Surguja (C.G.). 6. The Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Dumardeeh, C.H.C. Dhourpur, District Surguja (C.G.). Iti WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OUNDIA r "/jy XI-HG—78 ~5^1 '^TRRTiT, »ti1y'l6, fs|diyy,< ..U:..(?....C2>:)....?\^........^1'1 sTf^r lr^7 ('^3ar^) sn^v w R-ii'* TT%TT 3TI^?T shH ^iiWBfeg aii^i 31.10.2010 Shri V.K.Pandev. consel for Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, P. sovemnlent thatttet Grievance of the petitioner he was appointed in the thereafter on 27.11.08, after salarv to the tune ofRs. 91,185 U uo fonnal order has been passed Shri Psndev subinits fhat if direction is issued for decidiug| tlie petitioner as expeditiously as State counsel submits representation to fhe comipetent be decided in accordaace with lawt Accordiiigly, fhe petition is fhe petitioner to inake a fresfa withia a period of fbTee weeks fhis order and in tura, it is decide the said representation a( accordance witti law. It is made clear that this opinion on inerits of the case would be at Uberty to decide thc| with law. ct)N[d<l1T1 TFF^Tf^ fe^ ^R^R ^aiifwant?! |the petitioner. IL. for fhe state. |in the present petition is fh.at job in fhe year 2003 and Tekujanzias hiin his arrears of llas aiso been uaid but tfll date for his regularization. e|ads ofjustice would be served |fhe pendiag representatioa of bossible. fhe oetitioner inake a fresh feuthority and fhe saine woiild disposed ofwith a direction to re^iresentation to the resp. No.4 fro^n the date of receipt of copy of ex|>ected fz-oin fhe resp. No.4 to expeditiously as possible, ia ICourt has not expressed anv laad the authority concemed reprcsentation in acconlance Sd/- pritinker Diwakar Judge