IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. *** Crl.Misc.- M. No. 33472 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: November 28, 2011. *** Ved Pal Vs. State of Haryana and others. *** CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL. *** Present: Shri R.S.Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** RAJESH BINDAL, J The prayer in the present petition is for cancellation of bail granted to respondent No.4 by the learned trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the daughter of the petitioner was enticed away by respondent No.4. She was minor. The petitioner and the prosecutrix are now being threatened. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the paper book. A perusal of the order passed by the learned court below shows that the date of birth of the prosecutrix is 1.4.1994, as per the School Certificate available on the record. The alleged date of occurrence is 18.04.2011. She was more than 17 years of age on that date. The court below has recorded that there was no mark of external injury on the body of the prosecutrix and further that no specific medical opinion was there to prove that she was subjected to any recent sexual intercourse. She had admitted in her statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure that she had travelled with respondent No.4 to various places in buses and taxies. -2- Crl.Misc. M-No.33472 of 2011 Keeping in view the aforesaid facts noticed by the court below while granting bail to respondent No.4, no ground for cancellation of bail is made out. Dismissed. (Rajesh Bindal) November 28, 2011 Judge Malik