IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 17903 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 13th December, 2011. Vodafone Essar South Ltd., Mohali Petitioner through Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate Versus Regional Provident Fund, Punjab & Anr. Respondents through Mr. Saurabh Chopra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] This writ petition is directed against the order dated 16.09.2011 passed under Section 8-F of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The order was directly challenged before this Court as no Presiding Officer of the Appellate Tribunal constituted under the Act was appointed at that time. It is not in dispute that during the pendency of this writ petition, the Appellate Tribunal has become functional and in fact, on an appeal filed by the petitioner, an interim order has also been passed in its favour. That being so, the ancillary relief of detachment of the property of the petitioner can also be sought before the Tribunal. With liberty aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Dasti. December 13, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE