IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 11 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2008 Sandeep Haridas Wagh & Ors. ..... Applicants. V/s The State of Maharashtra. ..... ...... .Respondent. Mr.Sandeep K. Shinde, Adv. For the Applicant Nos. 1 to 3, 5 & 6. Mr.Y.S.Shinde, APP For the respondent. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 22/1/08 PC: Learned counsel for the applicants does not press the bail application to the extent of applicant Nos. 4 and 5 (Orig. Accused Nos. 5 and 6). All the applicants are convicted for offence punishable under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to RI for three years and fine of Rs.500/-. The case of the prosecution is that all the accused have harassed the passengers boarding Mumbai bound train at Dhule. The accused No.5 has allegedly snatched Rs.100/- from one of the passengers whereas accused No.6 has snatched mobile (cell) phone. No overt act is attributed to applicant Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Original accused No.4 has been granted bail in criminal application No.9/08. The case of the present applicants is similar to one who has been granted bail. The applicants were on bail during trial and have not misused the 1 same. In the circumstances same bail is continued during pendency of the appeal on furnishing fresh bail bonds. Application stands disposed of accordingly. 22.1.08 2