IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.9998 of 2009 Between: Thammaneni Nasaramma. … Petitioner And Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District and four others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri M.Brahma Reddy. Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Home. This Court made the following: ORDER:- The alleged inaction of respondents 1 to 3 in registering a criminal case on the complaint dated 29-4- 2009 submitted by the petitioner, is assailed in this Writ Petition. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home referred to the contents of the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.3, wherein it is mentioned that the complaint of the petitioner was considered and Crime No.77 of 2009 was registered on 5-5-2009 for the offence punishable under Sections 447 and 506 IPC read with Section 34 IPC; and that the said crime is pending investigation. In view of this stand taken in the counter-affidavit, which is not controverted by the petitioner, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:08-6-2009 MNR