{:K? \M/f @g/ \ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAT’I‘ISGARI-I AT BILASPUR 1CHHATTISGARHI WRIT PETITION (S) No. 312/ 0/ [2009. PETITIONER: Sunder Sai Sahu; - son of u— KW M M" 4, V aged about 64 years, residencs of vKasdola, Block Kasdole, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Versus M aH q V" Resgondents: /1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Education Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. The Accountant General of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur, t Chhattisgarh. 3. Block Education Officer, Kasdole, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. N WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE X CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / HIGH coum‘ OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition (s) No. 7214 of 2009 (Writ Petition under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shn' C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. and 3.. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for the respondents No. 1 Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate for the respondent No. 2 o R D Ei R (Oral) (Passed on this 10th day of December, 2009] Heard. With the consent of the parties the matter is heard fmally. 2. This case pertains to non—grant of retiral dues/pension. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the matter may be referred to the pension committee. 3. This Court, in the matter of W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh 85 others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursnant to the. order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P.No,1961]_2006 (Smt. Keja Bai .Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), andworder dated 13.3.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandai and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31$ January, 2008, passed in W.P.No. 4642/ 2004 (Baijnath Mandal (supra) ‘as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. 4. This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e., the o$ce of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a Petitioner Sunder Sai Sahu -Versus- Respondents State of Chhattisgarh 6r. others Thalcur WO My/ copy of this order as Well as a copy of the petition fmm the petitioner. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the peh‘tioner and ofhcers concerned within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after aifording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the o$cers concerned may idle additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner, may be completed Within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall supply one complete set of the petition to the State counsel for transferring the same to the Committee. J ‘ Sdl- I ‘l k Satish K. Agnihotr j ;_ Judge t