IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 31ST JANUARY 2011 / 11TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3076 of 2011(H) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- MACHINGAL MOIDEENKUTTY HAJI, S/O.ASEES, MACHINGAL HOUSE, POST TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL SRI.S.SHAJI RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT MINISTRY OF GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THRIUVANANTHAPURAM.690 001 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN- 690 001 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.PIN- 685 051 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.PIN- 685 051 5. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATION OFFICER, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.PIN- 685 051 R1 TO R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.3076/2011-H ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 31st day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is the Manager of a school. It is stated that the Government has accorded permission to the petitioner's school to function as L.P School under the Scheme for Area Intensive Programme of the Central Government vide its order dated 22/06/1995. The petitioner is presently aggrieved by Ext.P9 order passed by the Director of Public Instruction where the prayer to approve one appointment, has been rejected. The person appointed is one Mr.Deepesh who was appointed in the resignation vacancy of one Mr.Firoz as per order dated 06/11/2006. Initially, the application for approval was rejected as per Ext.P6 which was challenged by the petitioner in appeal. It is submitted that the fourth respondent allowed the appeal by order dated 18/11/2007, a copy of which is produced as Ext.P8 and the same has become final. For getting sanction of the salary, the petitioner filed a representation but the same was rejected as per Ext.P9. W.P.(C). No.3076/2011 -:2:- 2. The petitioner has filed a revision petition as per Ext.P10 before the first respondent. There will be a direction to the first respondent to take a decision on Ext.P10 after hearing the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of the Judgment before the first respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE