IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 9537 of 2008 Between: 1 D. Sambaiah S/o Late D. Danaiah r/o 1-84, Jalpally, Saroorngar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 2 D. Bhikshapathy S/o Late D. Danaiah r/o 1-86, Jalpally, Saroorngar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 3 D. Yadigiri S/o Late D. Danaiah r/o 1-63, Jalpally, Saroorngar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND The Tahsildar (mandal Revenue Officer) Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other approprite Writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the Respondent in not passing orders onthe petitioner's representation made under Sec. 32 for of the Andhra Pradesh (TA) Tenancy and Agricultural Land ct, of 1950 dated 24-5-2006 as illegal, arbitraryamounting to derelication of duty and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit and proper inthe circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MRSYED SHAREEF AHMED Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 9537 of 2008 Order: The petitioners state that their father, namely D. Danaiah was recognized as protected tenant in respect of the lands admeasuring Ac.1-19 guntas in Survey No.135, and Ac.0.07 guntas and Ac.4.25 guntas in Survey No. 136, situated at Jalpally, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, and after his death, they are cultivating the said lands. While so, it is the case of the petitioners, that when the original pattadars forcibly dispossessed them from the lands in question, they filed an application dated 24.05.2006, under Section 32 of the A.P. (T.A) Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950, requesting the respondent, namely the Tahsildar, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, to restore and deliver the vacant possession of the lands in question to them, but so far no action thereon had been taken. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: The respondent, namely the Tahsildar, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, is directed to consider and dispose of the application dated 24.05.2006, said to have been filed by the petitioners, under Section 32 of the A.P. (T.A) Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950, and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 29.04.2008 Ksr/Nsr