1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. O R D E R Sandeep. Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 420/2004 against the order dated 25-10-2002 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhadra, in Criminal Revision No.31/2002 (57/2000). ... Date of Order: September 18, 2006 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. R.K. Singhal, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr. R.S. Chaudhary, for the non-petitioner No.2. BY THE COURT: By the instant criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has challenged the order dated 25-10-2005 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhadra (for short, “the Revisional Court” hereinafter), whereby the Revisional Court dismissed the revision petition filed by the petitioner being Criminal Revision Petition No. 31/20021 (57/2000). I have heard learned counsel for the parties. The only contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the revision petition was filed by the petitioner before the Additional Sessions Judge, Nohar. Without 2 there being any intimation, the revision petition was transferred from the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Nohar to the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhadra and the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhadra, in absence of the petitioner, decided the revision petition, therefore, the petitioner has been deprived of the opportunity of hearing. From a perusal of the record, it appears that neither the petitioner nor the non-petitioner was having any knowledge about transfer the revision petition. The impugned order itself shows that only the Additional Public Prosecutor was present and none else. Therefore, without their being any notice to the concerned parties, the Revisional Court decided the matter and, thus, the impugned order deserves to be set aside. Consequently, the criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 25-10-2002 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhadra is set aside and the matter is remanded to the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhadra to hear the contesting parties and decide the revision petition afresh. The petitioner and the non-petitioner No.2 shall appear before the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhadra on 13-11-2006 and no fresh notice would be necessary to be issued to them. The stay petition stands disposed of. (H.R. PANWAR), J. mcs