1 FARAD CONSTITUTION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1262/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5959/2004 (D) (Pratibha Shikshan Prasarak Mandal ..vs.. State of Mah and others) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM:- B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND F.M. REIS, JJ. DATE:- NOVEMBER 20, 2009 Heard. The grievance is review applicants, who are respondent Nos.5 & 6 in writ petition, could not appear before this court because of fraud played by the petitioner. The contention is, he obtained Vakalatnama from respondent Nos.5 & 6 stating that he would arrange for everything and no amount was to be recovered from the management. However, after judgment dated 31st July, 2009, the petitioner has again started pressing demand against the Management. We find the grievance is misconceived because the application itself at one place states that everything has been paid to him by the management 2 and nothing is recoverable from it. At other place it is also stated that the said respondents have already raised a demand. This conduct needs to be appreciated in the background of the fact that petitioner had already filed a contempt in Contempt Petition No. 116/2006 against management and that contempt was disposed of on 15/9/2008. Respondent Nos.5 & 6 were at least then aware that petitioner was not cooperating with them in the matter. We, therefore, find that no case for review is made out. Application is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale.