1 Amk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 382 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 161 OF 2006 Shobha Ashok Adhav ... Applicant Vs. Rajendra Jayaram Gaikwad & anr. ... Respondents Mr. Jayesh Bansilal Kocheta for the applicant. Ms. S.V. Gajare APP for the respondent State. CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. Dated :- 24th September, 2009. PC : 01. The application is preferred for restoration of Criminal Revision Application 161 of 2006 along with Application for Condonation of Delay No. 682 of 2006. 02. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the revision application was dismissed as the applicant has served the respondents as per the order passed by this Court on 7th May, 2009. The affidavit of service was not filed before the returnable date and so it was 2 dismissed for default. He has pointed out that the respondent Nos.1 & 2 both had appeared in the matter. Hence, it may be restored. 03. For the reasons mentioned in the application for restoration, is allowed and Criminal Revision Application No. 161 of 2006 along with Application for Condonation of Delay No. 682 of 2006 are restored. 04. Delay of nine days in filing revision application is condoned and the said application is also allowed. 05. Matter is fixed for admission on 17th November, 2009. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)