IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 402 of 2010 Decided on: 9.3.2011 Sh. Kushal Chand and another …Petitioners Versus Sh. Deepak Shanan and another …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioners : Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. P.M. Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General, on the basis of instructions imparted to him by Mr. Deepak Shanan, Principal Secretary (Urban-cum-Local Bodies), submits that the judgment in question has been implemented in letter and spirit. 2. However, the petitioner instead of being regularized from December, 2001 has been regularized w.e.f. January, 2002. It is made clear that the petitioner shall be paid all the consequential benefits within a period of three months from today. Consequently, the present petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge March 9, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No