IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.460 of 2011 Girja Shankar Prasad Versus The Union Of India & Ors. ----------- 3. 14.9.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the order dated 30.8.2010 passed in the connected C.W.J.C. No.6699 of 2010 has not been complied with, as the correct present address of respondent No.4 could not be ascertained within the timeframe and due to confusion proper application for being permitted to take steps for substituted service of notice on respondent No.4 also could not be filed. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, C.W.J.C. No.6699 of 2010 is directed to be restored to its original file subject to the petitioner filing an application for being permitted to take steps for substituted service of notice on respondent No.4 within one week. The application is, accordingly, disposed of subject to the aforesaid condition. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )