IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.20922 of 2010 Date of decision : 25.11.2010 Bhajan Kaur and others … Petitioners Versus The State of Punjab and others …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Ms.Justice Ritu Bahri Present: Ms.Maninder, Advocate for the petitioners. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ritu Bahri, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that the matter is fully covered by the judgment of this Court rendered in case of Smt.Sudarshana Devi and another v. State of Punjab and others (CWP No.16323 of 2008 decided on 2.3.2010) reported as 2009(3) PLR 511. As per the judgment, the recovery orders have been quashed by placing reliance on the Full Bench of this Court in Budh Ram and others v. State of Haryana and others (CWP No.2799 of 2008, decided on 22.5.2009). The petitioners have been given liberty to appear before the Officers’ committee who was considered their claim in accordance with Rules/Government instructions and keeping in view the facts of individual case and shall make appropriate recommendations after hearing the petitioners in person, if so required. Learned State counsel does not dispute the factual position. The writ petition is disposed of in term of Smt.Sudarshana Devi and another v. State of Punjab and others (CWP No.16323 of 2008 decided on 2.3.2010). (Ritu Bahri) Judge 25.11.2010 sd