i.^^^^i-^lAMAA^J^aS'UftMdtllUUU.— S-IHniE C'Pf'^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.1 WRIT PETmON fS^ N0. B 4-f OF 2008^7- PETITIONER \^ .* ^K"^ ^^y' .-:^y . }S!- ^ /b- €€ ' <2<2'>" 6?'-- RESPQNDENTS Samaroo Lal Chauhan, Son of Shri Girdhar Chauhan, aged about 36 years, Presently posted at Govt. Primary School , Block Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.). VERSUS •f^\ ? ^ ·^\\ A ^y- ^o.^ .^ ^ State of Chhattisgarh, Tbrough: The Secretary, Department of Schoot Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The District Education Officer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.). The Block Education Officer, Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22^ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECnON/DIRECTIONS. HI6H COURT OF CHHATTESSARH AT BILASPUR W. P, (S) No. 845 of 2007 Petitioner : Samaroo Lal Chauhan Versus Respondents State of Chhati-isgarh & others Sii^le Bsneh: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. 5hri P.P. Sahu. Advocate for ths Petitioner. Shri Satish Supta, Deputy Sovernment Adyocate for the State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on -rfiis 13th day of February, 2007) 1. Learned counsel cppearing for -the petitioner subrnits thct the petitioner is working as Assistant Teacher in -t+ie Sovernment Primary School Kashipali. Block Basna, bistrict-Mahasamund. The petitioner has obtained B.T.I. Exomination certificcte 'm the year 1992, on his V- own expenses. 2. Learned counsel appearing for tiie petitioner submits that the question mvolyed, herein asto whe'rtier the teacher, who obtained S.T.I. Examination Certificate on hiS own expenses, isentitlsd to two advance increments. 3. Accord'mg to iearned counsel for 1+ie petitioner, 1+ie petitioner is entitied to two advonce increments in view of the decision of tiiis Court in •riie case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwcy Vs. Corporation. Dur-g snd another {2006 £11)MPJR-C6 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg ouid another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examination Certificate on theirown expenses, are coyered by the circular dated 24.12.98 issued by the State Sovernment of Madhya Pradesh. 4. Learnsd counsel for the petitioner further submits that the facts and question of law involved in the present case are squnrely covered by decision of this Court in the case of yashwemt Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation. Durg and cnother (Supra), to which learned counse! appearing for the respondents fairly concedes and agrees with the averment made by learned counssl appearing for the Detitioner. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Corporation. Dur^ ond cnother (Supro), subject to verification of »- the factcs to whether the petitioner hasacquired B.T.I. Examination Certificate on his own expenses cs per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotr Judge Subhash