IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.940 of 2006 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Versus SABIBA BEWA & ORS. ----------- 9 11.11.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and Counsel for the opposite parties. In the opinion of this Court, when the impugned order has been passed by Motor Accident Claim Tribunal cum Additional District Judge, Pakur, this Civil Revision Application against the said order would not lie before this Court. At this stage, Counsel for the petitioner would submit that as the petitioner was pursuing the remedy before this Court under bonafide impression for more than last two years, the filing of a revision before the competent Court may attract the question of limitation and therefore, this Court now should not throw this civil revision application at least for securing the ends of justice. Such submissions of the learned counsel has to be only noted for its being rejected inasmuch as once this Court does not have jurisdiction to examine the order passed by the Tribunal beyond this State, there would be no question of entertaining this case on any ground whatsoever. Of course, it would be always open 2 for the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum/court and take a plea that under a mistaken advice, it had moved a wrong court/tribunal, therefore, the delay in filing of the application be condoned. That being so, this application, being wholly misconceived, is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)