CHHATTISGARH IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF I AT BILASPUR w.P.(sn No. é2§2_ /2009 (sgj PETITIONER : Sitakant Joshi, f S/o Mani Lal Joshi, aged about 60 years, R/o (QWC9 % ”A Q» w$ , Village 8r, Post Nagoi Bajma, Bilaspur Distt.— Bilaspur (C.G. VERSUS (/ :1. State of Through:- ’ the REsPONDENTs Chhattisgarh, ‘Secretauy, Urban Administration and Development, D.K‘S. Bhawan, /_ ,Raipur' (C.G. l 2. ‘ Municipal Corporation Bilaspur Through—Commissioner Distt. — Bilaspur (C.G_.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE R\$ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA xxx; ) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 6252‘ 0f2009 ON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTI! U {ION OF INDIA WRIT PETITI SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present: Shri Aiav Shrivastava Advocate for the petitioner. Shri NiNRoy, Pane} iawyer for the State. Shri A.S.Kachhwaha, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 0‘75; ' day of December, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made a representation to the respondent No. 2 on 27.4.2009 and thereafter, a reminder on 29.5.2009. No decision has been taken till date on the said representation made by’the petitioner. 2. Shri Kachhwaha. learned Advocate appearing for the respondent- Corporation submits that a decision in accordance with law on its own perspective shall be taken on the above stated representations within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. 3. In View of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. 4. Consequently, the Writ petition is disposed of. Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri : l ‘ v' ' Judge ; PETITIONER Sitakant Joshi. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & anoiher.