% HiGH COURTOF CHHArriSGARH: BII-ASPUR Writ Petitison No. 5485012005 Paras Nath Singh, S/o. Shri Shankar Singh, aged about 46 years, Assistant Engineer (O&M) Division, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, r/o. Dharampura No.2 Jagdaipur, District Bastar Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretarv, Department of Electricity (Energy), D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, CG. 2$ The Chairman, through the Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Eieotricity Board, Dangania, Raipur, C.G. 3) Additionai Secretary, Chhatti^arh State Eieotrioity Board, Dangania, Raipur. 4) Chief Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Electrioity Board, jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG). (Writ Petiiion under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri A. Dewangan, counset for the petitioner. Shri U.N.S. Deo, Govt. Advocate for the respondent No.l/State. Shri A.S. Gahanwar, counsel for the respondents No. 2, 3 and 4. ORAL ORDER (Passedon 26*' February, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that since the petitioner has been granted relief by order dated 16-11-2007 (Annexure R/3) and the order dated 24-1-2008 (Annexure R/4), nothing sun/ives in the matter. Usarned counse! further submits that in rsgard to interest, the petittoner be granted iiberty to make a representation to the authorities concemed to consider his case for grant of interest, in accordance with law. 2) Shri A.S. Gaharwar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 2 to 4/Eleotricity Board submits that t'nere is no reason asto why the order dated 16-11- 2007 (Annexure R/3) and the order dated 24-1-2008 (Annexure R/4) shall not be given elfect to. The same shall bedone as earty as possible. —.--^ •, 2. - 3) In view of foregoing, learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that nothing sun/ives in the matter. . 4) Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Consequently, I.A.No.1 ^iands disposed of. ~' I Safish K. Agnihotri Judge Kaiu