6%? yaw/r @ ‘INITHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATFISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (S) No. . ?508 OF 2009 /. / Shivbachan Son of Chunnilal, aged aged 6O years, EX— PETITIONER Serviceman, Resident of Chopda Qtr. N0. 696, Bishrampur, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). Colony, VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. ‘5/ South Eastern Coalfieids Limited, Through the Chairman cum Managing Director, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.). 2./The Sub Area Manager, Rehar Gayatri Jainagar Sub Area, District Surguja (C.G.). 3. " The Personnei Manager, Rehar Gayatri Jainagar Sub Area, District Surguja C.G.). " WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As given in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As given in the cause titie. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3508 of 2009 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agiiihotri, J. Present: Shri Ashok K. Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.S.Koshy, Advocate for the respondents, ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 15m day of September, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the respondent- Company does not retain retiral dues of any employee. It is the practice to release the retiral dues on the same date on which the employee retires. However, in cases where no dues certificate is not produced before the retirement, the retiral dues cannot be gamed without no dues certificate as this is a statutory requirement. 2. Shri Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will submit no dues certificate at the earliest alongwith other claims. 3. Shri Koshy further submits that as soon as the no dues certificate is submitted, the respondent-Company shall take decision and pass appropriate order granting retiral dues in accordance with law, within a period of 10 days from the date ofreceipt ofthe no dues certificate. 4. In View of the foregoing. according to Shri Shukla, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. Amit 5. Consequently. the writ petition is disposed of. j ; . 5d]- f Satish K. Agnihotri, Judge PETITIONBR Shivbachan VERSUS RESPONDENTS South Eastern Coalfield? Limited & others.