IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46825 of 2007 1. MD.JAVED KHAN, SON OF MD. ABDUL ISLAM KHAN 2. MD PRAVEJ KHAN, SON OF MD. ABDUL ISLAM KHAN 3. MD. JUNED KHAN, SON OF MD. ABDUL ISLAM KHAN 4. MD. JAMSHED KHAN, SON OF MD. ABDUL ISLAM KHAN 5. ABDUL SALAM KHAN, SON OF LATE KABIL KHAN 6. ABDUL ISLAM, SON OF LATE KABIL KHAN 7. MD. ISRAR KHAN, SON OF ABDUL SALAM KHAN 8. MD. IBRAR KHAN, SON OF ABDUL SALAM KHAN 9. MD. ABDUL BARAKAT KHAN, SON OF LATE GHISA KHAN 10. MD. DOMAN KHAN, SON OF ABDUL BARAKAT KHAN. 11. MD. NAUSAD KHAN, SON OF LATE ABDUL HAMID. 12. MD. KAMARU KHAN, SON OF LATE JULAKAR NAIN KHAN ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE MUSTAFAPUR, POLICE STATION DINAR, P.O.- JIGANA, BHANAS (OP) DISTRICT- ROHTAS. 13. MD. TUFAIL KHAN SON OF RIJWAN KHAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HUWARI, P.S.- BABHNAUL, POLICE STATION DAWATH, DISTRICT- ROHTAS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MD. MOSTAKIN KHAN, SON OF RIJWAN KHAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HUWARI, P.O.- BABHNAUL, POLICE STATION DAWATH, DISTRICT- ROHTAS. For the petitioners : Mr. Ehtesham Khan, Advocate. For the O.Ps. : Mr. Abdul Mannan Khan, Advocate. ------------ 4 19.03.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioners assail the order taking cognizance dated 18/19.5.2007 passed in Complaint case no. 672 of 2006 (Tr. No. 3660 of 2007). Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegations are ex-facie concocted and levelled with ulterior reasons. It is next contended that the entire family members including the grandfather and other members of the extended family have been made accused. It is next contended that there is bona fide land dispute between the parties. Learned counsel for the opposite party on the other 2 hand submits that there is absolutely no infirmity in the order as the same was passed after examination of the complainant and three inquiry witnesses. This court does not find any merit in the application which is accordingly dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )