IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2011 / 1ST ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 23595 of 2011(Y) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- ARYALEKSHMI.I, D/O.SRI.REGHUNATHAN PILLAI.K, SREEPADOM,CHAVARA BRIDGE P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 001. 2. DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 001. 3. COMMISSIONER FOR ENTRANCE EXAMINATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDINGS,SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 001. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 23595/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF PROSPECTUS FOR ADMISSION TO MBBS DEGREE COUSE 2011. P2(a):COPY OF CERTIFICATE DATED 31/01/2011 ISSUED BY MILITARY OFFICER FOR CLAIMING RESERVATION. P2(b):COPY OF BATTLE CASUALTY CERTIFICATE. P3: COPY OF MEDICAL MARKS/DATA SHEET OF PETITIONER. P4: COPY OF CATEGORY WISE ADMISSION LIST (PROVISIONAL FOR MBBS). P5: COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 02/07/2011 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).23595/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner is the dependent of an invalidated soldier from Indian Peace Keeping Force deployed at Sree Lanka. Pursuant to Ext.P1 prospectus, claiming the benefit of reservation as provided in clause 5.2.2, petitioner submitted an application. According to the petitioner overlooking her priority, the dependent of a person who died in harness was granted admission. It is challenging the above, the writ petition has been filed. 2. On instructions from the respondents, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that a candidate should secure minimum 50% marks in the Entrance Examination and that the petitioner did not secure the same. No material has been produced by the petitioner to contradict the said submission of the learned Government Pleader. If that be so, petitioner cannot aspire for admission pursuant to Ext.P1 prospectus for having not secured the minimum prescribed marks in the Entrance Examination. W.P.(C).23595/11 2 3. That apart, petitioner also has not impleaded the student who is allegedly admitted overlooking her priority. For the aforesaid reasons, the writ petition cannot be entertained. It is accordingly dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs