IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35765 of 2010 1. Bucchideo Yadav, son of Shri Ram Prasad Yadav 2. Dayanand Yadav, son of Shri Ram Prasad Yadav 3. Manoj Yadav, son of Shri Ram Prasad Yadav Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR PP ----------- 2/ 11.10.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 414, 489 (B) and 489(C)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that no incriminating article was recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners and apart from the one and other case mentioned in the First Information Report the petitioners have fair antecedent. The fact that the petitioners are accused in only one other case besides the present one will be verified by the court below before releasing the petitioner on bail. Considering the same, let the petitioners above named, who are in custody since 12.06.2010, be released on 2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 166 of 2010 (G.R. No. 574 of 2010) , subject to the conditions, (i) that one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and the other bailor shall be the father of the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners, (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse,(iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv) That the petitioner will be 3 well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Ashwini/ (Anjana Prakash, J. )