A ^ IN THE HIGH COUR5 OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR (WlIT 30RISDICTION] CIVIX. WRIT PETITION HO. 'Z-?'3?/ OF .2001 7 IN IHE MATTER OP: Raju Bam Pat^l, Aged 55 years, S/o Sri DykaiB Ram Pat'el/ 0/0 Subdivision&l Officer,. ; iSafcer Management Siibdivision No. S Baloda Bazar, • : . ^ District: Raipur (CHHS.TTISSARH) pEmrosER VERSUS 1. Sfcate of Chhattisgaeh Secretary, ' ' Water Resources Department, Secyetariat, Rsipur (C.G.; 2.Chief Engin^er, Mahanadi Project, ^' Raipur V?:l.<---v,^>^' •**' AV\l^v'* .y"fc l-:...--'r!i^ .^^•"S(^ <,.^^^-^""' <*, ^-. 3.ExeGufcive Engiheer, Water. Resources Division No.2< Raipur 4.Sutedivisional Offxcer, WatAr Management Subdivisioti N0,6 Baloda Bazar, DistricpsRaipur . BB9 RESPONDENTS To, The Hon'ble Cfaief Justiee aQd,,Hls CompaniOD Justices of tbe • . Hon'ble High''Court of - ' Chbattisgarh at Bi1aspur. ,.JR- r'a?la r'1.']^^',1, : • rs" "- • &3S' E'ETITION ONOERARTICLB 226 OF_TBE CONSTTTOTION QF INBIA . THE PSTITXCttiER ABOVENAME8 MOSTiBESeECTE'ULIff'STATES'AlS.'lBroER;''. ! : ••, ' ' '!' . . 1'1 :s-:s9aSB^'? /;cS^3S!^B*^,J' XI-HC-22 3s? ^ll'4lc)<l, Wlwis, Riciwy 3TI^?T <<i<<sb *<iini »*ii<* ^..y-.^..r?(t>.-.2A' f^l' JM^ 3n^r?>r R-fi+sn^w ShliqidfeT wm ^fe- an^T 6WIW Wfter 'ianwzoos- Shri Suriil Otwani.Gounsel forttte ShriP.S.Koshy, Deputy Advoca(e Shri R.M.Sholapuikar, Heard. Leamect counsel for the petiti^ order dated 15/D9/a»5 passed in W| mattere. Mr. P.S.Koshy, learned counse| of the counset for the petitioner. Leamed counsel forthe petlttoji dated 28/02/2001 and 07ffl^2001 the | effect from 28/02/2004. Later on, the| 11/10/2004 and the petitioner joined h|' all^ed contemnor in Cortempt Petitioti passed by this Court by removing the reinstated the petitioner afler the alteged contemnor has tendered ap() ordere ofthe above stated orders ofthis In vlew of the above stated wages from 28/02/2004till he was back wages be paid immedlatdy Accordingty ftie petition stands allowetl passed by this Court in W.P, No. contempt notice stands diseharged. C.c. as per rules. ?bi<iId4l4'<i*<ffTffFs'<!l <Ritei< ^>3lR|IT3TI^T t|epetitloner. y Advoca(e General for the State. eounsel lor the respondent No.4. »nersubmits that his case is coverect by IP. No. 1914/2W4 and other connected |for the ^ate agrees with the submission petltiojier submtts that despite the stay ordere betiUoner was removed from servioe with petitioner was reinstated h service on (s setviee on 12/10/2004. Mr. K.S.Dhruv, No. S9/2004 has disobeyed the wdere bettttoner from the service and thereatter Petition No. 89^004 wasfiled. Tte ^ogy unconditionally for disobeying the Court. the petitloner is entltted fbr the baek in seivi(»i.e. up to 12/10/2004. The a period of pnemonth from today. in terms of the orcter dated 15090005 and other eonnected mattera. The Cont^mpt fatts reinstated witlitn 19142004 Sd/- Satish K. Asnihotri Judge (ifl^^f^)