WP(C) 3781/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA Heard Mr. B. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M. Bhagabati, learned CGC for the respondent No.1 and Mr. D. Baruah, learned co unsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that though in the voter list his name has be en shown as the ’D’ voter, he was not given any opportunity of establishing his status as citizen of India. Further grievance of the petitioner is that he did n ot receive any notice from the Foreigners Tribunal as yet. Learned counsel for the petitioner by producing an order dated 28.11.2011, as pa ssed in W.P.(C) No.3531/2011 (Rinawara Begum vs. Union of India & Ors.), submits that if similar order is passed in this writ petition, the writ petitioner will be immensely benefited. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents did not oppose the proposition. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the parties and consid ering the matter in its entirety, this writ petition is disposed of directing th e Superintendent of Police (B), Nagaon, Assam, to make a reference to the Foreig ners Tribunal, Nagaon, to determine the citizenship status of the writ petitione r in accordance with law and in accordance of the Foreigners Act,1946. Such refe rence shall b made within a period of one month from today. On receipt of the re ference, the Tribunal shall proceed with the matter and decide the reference as expeditiously as possible. If the reference has already been made in favour of t he petitioner, the direction contained in this order for further reference shall be ignored. Needless to say, the Tribunal shall serve notice on the petitioner. With the observation and direction as indicated above, the writ petition stands disposed of.