IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32226 of 2009 Naresh Yadav @ Sanjay Yadav, Son of Jugeshwar Yadav, Resident of Village Kanchanpur, P.S. Anti, District Gaya. -------- Petitioner Versus State of Bihar ------- Opp. Party ----------- 4 2.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. Considering the nature of allegation and criminal antecedent of the petitioner as also the materials collected against the petitioner in this case, this Court would not be inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for an offence under Sections 307/399/402/353 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 150 of the Indian Railway Act. This Court, however, would find from the impugned order itself that the trial of the petitioner has already been taken up and counsel for the petitioner also informs this Court that out of eight witnesses, four of them have already been examined. In that view of the matter, the trial court is directed to ensure that the trial of the petitioner is concluded within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and if the trial of 2 the petitioner would not be concluded in the aforementioned timeframe, the petitioner will have liberty initially to move the trial court which would be under obligation to record reasons for not concluding the trial whereafter only, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before this Court. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)