MC 3892/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE T.NANDAKUMAR SINGH in WP(C) No.5921/2010 Mr K.P.Sarma, learned counsel for the applicant. This court passed an interim order dated 3.11.2010 in the prese nt writ petition to the effect that the court considered the matter in its entir ety and in the interest of justice,it was directed that the writ petitioner Smti Bulbuli Das @ Buli Bala Das, W/o Sri Gour Chandra Das shall not be deported fro m India, without obtaining leave of this Court, subject to the condition that th e writ petitioner shall, within a week from that day, report to the Superintende nt of Police, Goalpara. Subsequently, this court passed an another interim order dated 29.11.2010, which are as follows: List on 25.1.2011. In the meantime, the petitioner will report every week to the Super intendent of Police, Goalpara. In the event the petitioner does not report to the Superintendent o f Police, Goalpara, a report be submitted to the court urgently . Pursuant to the interim order of this court, the writ petitione r surrendered before the Superintendent of Police, Goalpara on 29.11.10 and on t he very date, she was sent to jail. The husband of the writ petitioner by filing an application dated 2.12.10 bringing to the notice of the Superintendent of P olice, Goalpara that there is no any specific direction of this court that the petitioner would report to the Superintendent of Police, Goalpara and also praye d for releasing of his wife to comply with the specific direction of the court d ated 29.11.2010. It is in reply to the said application dated 2.12.2010, the peti tioner had been informed by the Superintendent of Police, Goalpara that the writ petitioner would not be released from jail without an order of this court. It is clear from the order of this court dated 3.11.2010 that the petitioner should not be deported from India without obtaining leave of this Court, subject to the condition that the writ petitioner shall, within a week report to the Superintendent of Police, Goalpara. But it appears that ther e was little delay on the part of the writ petitioner in reporting before the S uperintendent of Police, Goalpara. Hence, there is no question of detaining the writ petitioner in the jail custody as this Court made a clear cut direction vid e order dated 29.11.2010 that the writ petitioner has to report before the Supe rintendent of Police every week. Accordingly, the petitioner shall be released f rom jail custody and in compliance with the direction of this court mentioned ab ove, she shall report the Superintendent of Police, Goalpara every week and she shall not be deported from India without the leave of this court. With the above observations, this Misc case stands allowed.