WPMS No. 1900 of 2009 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for the petitioners. M.S. Tyagi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 11. Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos. 12 and 13. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the opinion that the order of the appellate court granting injunction requires no interference in a writ jurisdiction. It is, however, made clear that since the defendant/petitioners are in joint possession and wants to move an appropriate application for repairs, the Court accordingly directs the defendant to move an appropriate application for repairs before the trial court concerned. If such an application is moved, the trial court will pass an appropriate order after hearing all parties concerned. The writ petition is disposed of. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 05.01.2011 Shiv