'ffS^'&f ff ^'i?^Ll ^?l IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITIQN (St NO?^.?.2r..OF 2011 PETITIONER ~\^ .\ /fl7/~ ^ ^^ /A^ ^/^•/ ^y. ^'.sf ..••• .<'•' RESPONDENTS Mahesh Chandra, S/o Sukhdev Ram Chandra, Aged about 49 years, Occupation- Service, posted at Chief Executive Of&cer, Janpad Panchayat, Raigarh, R/o Block Colony, Chakradhar Nagar, Tahsil and District, Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through Principal Secretaiy, Panchayat and Gramin Vikas Vibhag. Additional Secretary, State of Chhattisgarh, Panchayat and Grainin Vikas Vibhag. CoUector, Dista-ict Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. Chief Executive Of&cer, District Panchayat, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^2. ^•n "•'? Wii>;:i>i^';-^s~'-.^5y^-F ^ f.t^\ (,::»>,,. 1> t HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGAiRH AT BILASPUR SB : HOH'BLE MR. JUSTICB PRITIHKBR DIWAKER W.P.ISI.BO. 3932/2011 versus RBSPONDEHTS State of Chhattisgai-h & Shri Sunfl Sahu, counsel for ffae petttioner. Shri Yashwaat Siagh Tfaakur, Dy.A.G. fcrtheState. WRITPETITIQNO^BRARTICLB2260FTHE<X>N8TITUTIOH OF INDIA (22.07.2011) At the outset, Shri Sahu submits fhat he is coaiinmg his picsent writ petition on3y ia respect ofrelfef 10.1 i.e. the chalknge to the suspension order date 6.6.2011. He subjnits that in respect of other relief i.e. 10.2, he may be permitted to wiftidraw this petition with Uberty to file separa.tc petition. In respect of suspension oider, it has been argued by Shri Sahu fhat as per Annexure P/10, instead of suspending fhe petitioner fhe respondents ought to have posted him in soaie ofher place. He fairty subnuts fhat by chaBenging the suspension order the petitioner has already filcd an appeal on 16.6.2011 {Aiuiexure P/9) aad fhe purpose of filiug fhis petition would be served if direction is issued to flie respondent N0. l for deciding the pendiag appeal of the Shri Thakur ooints out that the petitioner has recenfty fited fhis appeal on 16.6.2011 and has nished to thm Court wiftiout waitmg for sufficient period. He however has no objection if the pendiug appeal offhe petitioner is decided in accordance with law. The present petition is disposed ofwifh a direction to the resp. N0.1 to decide fhe pendiag appeal of fhe petitioner to accoidaace with law as expeditiously as possible preferabty withia a period of -three weeks frora. fhe date ofreceipt ofcopy ofthis oider. V. It is made cfear that this Court bas aot expressed any opinion on inerits ofthe case and fhe authority concemed would be at libertv to decide the appeal ofthe petitioner in accordance vrith law. The petitioner would be at liberty to fite a fi-esh petition ia respect ofthe icUef 10.2 as prayed for. — ——— — Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge