IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1808 OF 2005 Kuber Sahebrao Takmoge & Anr. ...Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.Ujjwal R.Agandsurve for Applicants. Mr.D.R.More, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 17, 2005. MARCH 17, 2005. MARCH 17, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. Having regard to the nature of material on record, I see no reason to depart from the conclusion reached by the Court below in Paragraph 7 of the order for rejecting the Bail Application preferred by the present Applicant. 3. Having regard to the seriousness of the : 2 : offence and complicity of the Applicants, not a case for bail. Hence, rejected. 4. As prayer for bail is rejected, the Sessions Judge, Solapur is directed to assign the case to the Fast Track Court, to ensure early disposal of the trial as ‘High Court Expedited Case’, preferably within six months from the receipt of writ of this Court. 5. Application disposed of on the above terms. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.