THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.32512 OF 2010 DATED: 11-04-2011. Between J.Balakrishna … Petitioner And 1.The APSRTC, rep. by its Vice-Chairman and Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad and three others …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.32512 OF 2010 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not considering the case of the petitioner for regularization in terms of proceedings No.PA/255 (8)/2009-CCE, dated 19-10-2010 as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, contrary to law and also in violation of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents herein to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization. 2. Brief facts that are necessary for disposal of the present writ petition are; the petitioner was appointed as Casual Labour (Mazdoor) in Civil Engineering Department, APSRTC under the 4th respondent from 20-05-1984 on monthly wage of Rs.250/- and he continued to work as such up to 18-01-1985 i.e., for more than 240 days and thereafter, he was discharged from service w.e.f. 19-01-1985. The 2nd respondent during July, 1986 appointed 26 employees, who worked as Casual Labour/Contract Labour in Civil Engineering Department as Mazdoors on temporary basis, but he was not appointed even though he had worked for more than 240 days in APSRTC. In pursuance of the proceedings, dated 19-10-2010, the Chief Civil Engineer of 1st respondent directed all the Executive Engineers of Civil Engineering Department to submit certain information with regard to contract Labour worked in the Civil Engineering Department and the petitioner requested the respondent to consider his name also for regularization. He was informed that unless he gets a direction from the Court, his name will not be considered. Hence, the writ petition. 3. Heard both the counsel. 4. In pursuance of the proceedings, dated 19-10-2010, all the Executive Engineers are requested to verify the information submitted by them thoroughly and submit the information once again duly including the following points: 1. Date of initial engagement through contractor. 2. Whether the Contract Labour working continuously under contractor or not name-wise. If not, mention breakage period. 3. Caste particulars of each individual contract labour. 5. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he comes under the norms prescribed in the proceedings, dated 19-10-2010, his name was not considered. Whether the petitioner comes within the norms or not has to be decided by the Executive Engineer concerned. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to submit his application along with all the relevant documents for the purpose of taking decision as to whether he is eligible for absorption as Casual Labour (Mazdoor). 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to submit appropriate application along with all the relevant documents within two weeks from today and thereafter, 1st respondent is granted three months time to take appropriate decision in accordance with rules and regulations of the corporation. No order as to costs. --------------------- K.C.BHANU, J DATED: 11-04-2011 Note: Issue CC in 3 days Hsd