1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.10.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 13989 of 2011 Ganesan : Petitioner Vs. State rep by 1. The Superintendent of Police Pudukkottai Pudukkottai District 2. The Inspector of Police Thirukokarnam Police Station Pudukkottai District : Respondents PRAYER: Petition is preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C directing the second respondent to take suitable action against the proposed accused and provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and his property based on his representation, dated 23.09.2011. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Jameel Arasu For Respondents: Mr.P.Kannithevan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R Seeking a direction to the second respondent to take suitable action against the proposed accused and provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and his property based on his representation, dated 23.09.2011, the petitioner has come forward with this Petition. 2. In my considered opinion, Section 482 of Cr.P.C., cannot be invoked for the said purpose. The petitioner has got alternative remedy before Trial Court. 3. In such view of the matter, this Petition is dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (A.S) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (C.S) To 1. The Superintendent of Police Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District 2. The Inspector of Police Thirukokarnam Police Station Pudukkottai District 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 13989 of 2011 28.10.2011 vsg/RJ/9.11.11/(1p/4c) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/