FAO No.5320 of 2009 -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.5320 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 13.1.2010 Brij Mohan ..Appellant. Vs. Sudhir Sood and others ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present : Mr.C.L.Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.D.R.Bansal, Advocate for the respondents. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This appeal arises out of an order passed by Additional District Judge, Kurukshetra dated 1.10.2009 whereby an Objection filed by the appellant under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short `the Act') for setting aside award of the Arbitrator has been dismissed. Shorn of unnecessary details, it would be worthwhile to mention here that the Objection filed under Section 34 of the Act was alleged to be beyond limitation for which issue No.3 was framed as to whether Objections are time barred and if so, its effect? The learned Additional District Judge while deciding issues No.2 to 5 together held that neither the Objection Petition is maintainable nor they are in time. The appellant, in the grounds of appeal, did not challenge findings recorded on issues No.2 to 5 much less the findings recorded on issue No.3 that the Objections are not within limitation or the finding recorded by the Court FAO No.5320 of 2009 -2- below is illegal. As a matter of fact, the grounds of appeal is totally silent in this regard. Moreover, during the course of hearing, counsel for the appellant has failed to attack the finding recorded by the Court below on issue No.3. In view of the above, the finding on issue No.3 recorded by the Court below has been accepted to be correct. Hence, I do not find any merit in the present appeal and the same is hereby dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 13.1.2010 JUDGE Meenu