^^ 0^"'fl .^^t^ .....^•:^.^^J>" •^^^.^- ^^ ^-^^•••"" BEFORETHEHON'BLEHIGHGOURTOFCHHAmSGARHAt BILASPUR WRITPEtltlON fSTNO.^C^ /2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1. Dr. Manik Chatterjee aged about 57 years, S/o Late Shri C.L. Chatterjee, Presently working as Associate Professor Anatomy Medical college, Raipur (C.G,) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Medical Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). t"^ ^ ^ittM • 2 State of Madhya Pradesh, through Secretary, Medical Education Department, Valabh Bhawan. Bhopal (M.P). iFt^: WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTlbN OF INDIA FORISSUANCE OFWRITOF MANDAMUS.CERTIORARI OR DIRECTION OF LIKEJ^AATURE. XI-HC—78 STI^T^Tf^W ^ffSn^T ^b^ioh ^ITR^T (t»si|ch ^^T ^is^i^^ ^Til<-i^<o, f^<ni<4^< ^......W:.P..-..^X(^.:M^to200 ^I^T TT?R? ( yif^^) ^TTW 1Rf^T ^H^?? SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRltlNKERDIWAKER 01.09.2010 Shri N.K.Vyas, counsel for t| Shri Ahit Singh, P.L. fer the| Shri Rajeev Shrivastaya, cot|j Grievance of the petitioner| monetarryr benefit-of the promotiont and the probation period of the pe| The further grievance of the p4 20.11.90 to 25,11.91 has been h4 opporfcunity to the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner si withdraw this petition at this sl representation before resDondent respondent N0.1 be directed to d| considering all the aspects of the c^ On the other hand, State objection if the petitioner makes decided in accordan.ee with law. The petitioner is permitted evenfcuality of filing any such repj N0.1, it is expected that the same concerned in accordance with 3.aw. It is made clear that this Co on merits ofthe case and the auth( to decide the appeal stri.ctly in accc <i*»11l<f<r1^i^W^ff ^ 'fe^ <R»i^i< ^sffimsii^r xe petitioner. ^tate/resp. No.l. nse! for respoxident No.2. is that he has not been R-ranted 3.1 post of Reader right from 5.4.99) |:itioner was unnecessarily delayed. titioner is that the period from id as dias non without giving any tbmits that he may be permitted to jage with liberty to file a proper Ko.l He however submits that the ^oide the said representation after ise. bounsel submits that he has no k representation and fche sa.me is |to withdraw this petition. -In the »|tesentation before the respondent |would be decided by the authority ^irt has not expressed any opinion .^rity concerned would be at liberty }'dance wifch law. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge ^