1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION F. NO.3097/2010 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.20471/2010 Rajesh Kesharilal Belokar ...Versus... Smt. Sanyukta Singh w/o Sunil Kumar and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. [Shri U.N. Vyas, Adv. for applicant] [Ms Anita Singh, Adv. for respdt. No.2] CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 03.08.2011. Though served, none appears for respondent nos.1 and 3. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and respondent no.2. In support of the application, the learned Counsel for the applicant argued that delay deserves to be condoned since the applicant was required to attend the medical treatment due to injury caused in the accident in question and therefore, there is good reason for condoning the delay. Per contra, the learned Counsel for respondent no.2 opposed the application and argued that the application is not supported by any 2 documentary evidence and therefore, the same should be rejected. Having heard learned Counsel for the rival parties, I find that there is no reason why statements made by the applicant in paragraph nos.2 and 3 should not be found sufficient to condone the delay of 139 days. Hence, I am satisfied that the delay has been properly explained. Hence, delay is condoned. Civil Application is allowed. Civil Application stands disposed of. JUDGE ssw