o) $ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPJJR of 2008 PETITIONER/: (Plaintiff) ^^•^:s^ Writ Petition (0 No. 7 4 7 ^' Smt. Durga Bai Shrivas, W/o Babulal Shrivas, Aged about 68 years, R/o Sahu Bada, In frontof Santoshi Bada, Gudiyari, Raipur (C.G.) - Versus - ^^^ RESPONDENT/: (Defendant) BhuvaneshwarKshatri,L L- S/o Gopinath Kshatri,y^a*'ou+<'svts R/o House No.61, Santoshi Bada, Sahupara, Ward No.3, Gudiyari, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS. DIRECTIONS ETC.. IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKE NATURE "3'^r T^i^i<n^, ^til<H^(o, f®i<ni<H^< * —.kj.^^...^.........7^..?:.......- Nl^d) ^i<|^^f:^^ h" ^ 200 <g ^?T TR^T ('^rf^3^) ^T f^lfe •^m^Tr^T-^rte Sahu i^?W^^T3^T S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. A^sarwal 17.06.2009 Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, Ad\ Shri Bhishma Kinger, Advoc Heard on admission. Learned counsel appearing f( the impugned order dated 24.01^ on nierits without considering the the impugned order dated 24.01,20< In view of above stated appearing for the parties, I am impugned order dated 24.01.200^ quashed. It is further directed that tl Judge, Raipur, shall hear applicat provisions ofSection 13 (6) ofC.C after afFording due opportunity thereafter shall proceed to decide tl| With the above observation costs. <^i^tcn^i<T ^TR^* ^f fe^t <^i^5< ^^PRT ^n^T pcate for the petitioner, ^te for the respondent. ^r the partiesjointly submit that in fact |008 (Annexure P/7) has been passed |submissions of the parties, therefore, 1)8 deserves to be set aside. ^.ir statement made by the counsel |of the considered opinion that the deserv'es to be and is accordingly |ie First Appellate Court i.e. District |ion of the petitioner filed under the \. Accommodation Control Act, afresh |Df hearing to both the parties and |e same in accordance with law. |his petitipn is allowed. No order asto Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge