HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONERS RESPQNDENTS Present: Mit Amit WRIT PETmON No. 2089 of2006 : 1. Smt. Savitri, Aged about 60 years, D/o Late Hiraniati (D/o Late Hulasram), W/o idayram Nayak, R/o Saposh, P.S. & Tahsil Dabhaia, District Janjgir-ChatBpa (C.G.) Presently R/o Devgaon, P.S. Sariya, District Raigarh (C.G.) 2. Bilaskunwar, Agsd about 55 years, D/o Late Hiramati (Late D/o Hulasram Patel) W/o Mukundprasad Nayak, R/o Saposh, P.S. & Tahsil Dabhara, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Presently R/o Lodhiya, P.S. Baramkela, Disfriet Raigarh VERSUS : 1. The Manager, Bilaspur-Raipur Qihetdya Gramin Bank, Branch Saposh, District Janjgir-Champa 2. Public at large (whosoever related to deceased Hiramati Patel). WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Ue Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Shri Ashok Som, Advocate fortiie petitionera. ORALORDER (Passed on 1 la day of November, 2008) The petitioners seek to chailenge the OTder dated 29.03.2006 passed by the Civil Judge, Class 1, Sakti, in Misc. Civil Case No. 06/2005 on an application filed by one Suresh Kumar and Ganpati, son of Aceheram PateL on tiie gyound fhat the property allegedly bequeatfaed in the aame of petitioners is fhe property of temple which camot be handed over to any person by way ofWill. The Civil Judge has allowed the application filed by Shri Suresh Kumar and Ganpati. The petitioners have filed Ihis petition impugping the above-said order whhout impleading Suresh Kumar and Gaupati as party-respaidents. It appears Ihat they have deliberately not been impleaded as party respondents, thou^i their application was allowed. In ahsence ofnecessary parties, this petition is not maurtainable. 3. Without expressing asxy opinion on merits of the case, this petition is dismissed as not maintainable. No order asto costs. 4. Consequently, M(W)P No. 1593/2006, also stands dismissed. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge 1. 2. K'