IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49635 of 2008 DHANESHWAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.12.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Police case under Sections 409, 420 and other provisions of the Penal Code. It is urged that co-accused have been granted anticipatory bail by the court below on common allegations. The petitioner has now retired from service. The allegations are of sub- standard construction of the School building. For reasons of the materials noticed in the case diary with regard to the sub-standard quality of the construction alleged, this Court is not persuaded to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail merely for grant of the same to the co-accused. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merits keeping in mind that the fact remains that the co-accused had been granted anticipatory bail without being prejudiced by the present order. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)