IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 5195 of 2002 Between: Anumalasetty Raghavulu Choultry, Rep.by its Present Manager, Sri Rachuri Narasimha Rao, S/o. China Somayya, R/o. Pamuru, Prakasham District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Inspector of Police, Pamur Police Station, Prakasham District. 2 The Executive Ingineer, R & B, Division, Kanigiri, Prakasham District. 3 R.Sreenivalusu, S/o. Kondaiah, Old Masjid Centre, Western side of Anumalasetti raghavulu Choultry, Pamuru, Prakasham District. 4 T.Nazarath, S/o. Shivaramaiah, Old Masjid Centre, Western side of Anumalasetti raghavulu Choultry, Pamuru, Prakasham District. 5 Shaik Rahmthulla, S/o. Sri Basha, Old Masjid Centre, Western side of Anumalasetti raghavulu Choultry, Pamuru, Prakasham District. 6 Pasupuleti Adinarayana, S/o. Tirupalu, Old Masjid Centre, Western side of Anumalasetti raghavulu Choultry, Pamuru, Prakasham District. 7 R.Krishnaiah, S/o. Kondaiah, Old Masjid Centre, Western side of Anumalasetti raghavulu Choultry, Pamuru, Prakasham District. 8 Syed Mahboob Pasha, S/o. Gaida Saheb, Old Masjid Centre, Western side of Anumalasetti raghavulu Choultry, Pamuru, Prakasham District. 9 Deputy Commissioner Endowments, Guntur, As impleaded as per court order is WPMP. 20756/2002 dt.19-11-2002. 10 Assistant Commissioner Endowments, Ongole, As impleaded as per court order is WPMP. 20756/2002 dt.19-11-2002. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: None appeared. Counsel for the respondents : --- O R D E R: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ order of Mandamus against the 1st respondent to assist to remove all the bunks in front of the 7 shops in order to have free acess of ingress and aggress into the same and also issue a mandatory interim direction against respondents 3 to 8 to remove their bunks put up in the R&B margin immediately or else the petitioner will be put to great injustice and irreparable loss.” When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 24- 09-2008, no one appeared for the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition was adjourned to today to be posted under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, when the writ petition is taken up, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed in default. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 25th September, 2008 vrn