IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46189 of 2009 BABLOO MEHTA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 03/ 04/03/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the informant who has appeared suo motu. The defence of the petitioner in a police case under Sections-451, 376 and 511 of Indian Penal Code is of false implication and custody on that basis since 4.9.2009. Four days thereafter the informant is alleged to have filed a complaint case where she is alleged to have made out an entirely new case that the petitioner was accompanied by two others. Learned counsel for the informant fairly submits that he is not in a position to make any submissions with regard to the pleadings in paragraph- 5 of the belongings of the petitioner allegedly left behind at her residence. Learned counsel for the State from the case diary submits that it contains no materials with regard to either the medical report of the victim or the belongings of the petitioner as mentioned in paragraph- 5 of the subsequent complaint. Having considered the facts and 2 circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Alamnagar P.S. Case No75 of 2009. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)