IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 605 OF 2007 SHRI ILARIO AGOSTINHO MENEZES ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr.A.F.Diniz with Mr. Aires Rodrigues,Advocates for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Kantak,Advocate General With Ms R. Chodankar, Addl. Govt. Advocate. Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 17th March, 2008 P.C. The learned Advocate General states that in regard to petitioner and co-owner's property, the respondent would initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings. In view of the said statement, the grievance of the petitioner that declaration was issued beyond the period of the limitation stands vindicated and consequently, the grievance does not survive. While accepting the statement on behalf of the respondent that the proceedings for land acquisition of petitioner's property would be initiated afresh, we make it clear that the proceedings so far initiated as far as property of the petitioner is concerned are rendered void. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. SMA