AGK IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.30 OF 2008. APPLICATION NO.30 OF 2008. APPLICATION NO.30 OF 2008. IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.29887 OF 2007. APPEAL (ST) NO.29887 OF 2007. APPEAL (ST) NO.29887 OF 2007. Sashikant Natali ...Applicant Versus. Sanjay Vithal Waghamare & Ors. ...Respondents Shri Teja Dande for the Applicant. Shri Vivek N. Lodge for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6 and 7. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 19th MARCH, 2008. : 19th MARCH, 2008. : 19th MARCH, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Advocates appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 6 and 7 seek time to file reply. Delay in preferring appeal is only of 21 days. Hence, time cannot be granted to file reply. Application is opposed by the advocate appearing for the respondents. In view of the averments made in the application, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay of 21 days. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Appeal shall be placed for admission immediately after the same is registered. Judge. Judge. Judge.