IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.971 OF 2009 AND MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.12304 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2383 OF 2009 (D). (SHRI DATTATRAYA GANFADE.Vs. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENTOF POLICE & ORS.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Shri K.S. Deshpande, Advocate for Applicant. Mrs. T.D. Khade, A.G.P. for Respondents. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 09, 2009. 1. Heard learned Advocates for the parties. 2. Perused application. 3. Accepting the reasons towards delay caused in filing application for restoration as well as reasons towards absence on the date when the writ petition was dismissed, which are good and sufficient, both the applications are allowed. JUDGE JUDGE RR. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2383 OF 2009 (D). (SHRI DATTATRAYA GANFADE.Vs. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENTOF POLICE & ORS.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Shri K.D. Deshpande, Advocate for Applicant. Mrs. T.D. Khade, A.G.P. for Respondents. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 09, 2009. 1. Heard. 2. Notice. 3. Learned A.G.P. Mrs. Khade waives service. 4. The parties are put to notice that the writ petition would be heard and decided finally at the stage of admission itself. 5. In the mean time, the petitioner is free to offer himself for medical examination. If he so offers, the same shall be completed. 6. In so far as the aspect of back wages is concerned, the impugned order does not disclose any reason for disallowing the back wages. 7. On this limited point the petition would be heard on Monday i.e. 16th November, 2009. 8. Steno copy is allowed. JUDGE JUDGE RR.