1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CA/7756/2011 IN CA/72550/2011 In WP/9926/2010 *** Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. RAST/7756/2011 In WP/9926/2010 NILKANTA BHAGWAT KHARDE AND ANR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS *** Mr. S. M. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. V. H. Dighe, A.G.P. for the Respondent/ State Authorities. *** 1. By consent, review application is heard for admission. 2. The applicant is seeking review of the order dated 19th October, 2010 passed in Writ Petition No.9926 of 2010. The relevant portion of the order reads thus: "1. The limited grievance in the petition is that though the Sub-Divisional Officer, Shrirampur, vide order dated 5th March, 2009, has directed the Respondent No.3 to hear all the concerned parties, regarding the amount of compensation to be paid to the tenants and the land owners, the same is not yet decided by the Respondent No.3. 2. The Respondent No.3 is directed to decide the matter in accordance with the directions of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Shrirampur, dated 5th March, 2009, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties. The same shall be 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CA/7756/2011 IN CA/72550/2011 In WP/9926/2010 *** Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. done within a period of three months from today." 3. From bare perusal of the order it is clear that no prejudice whatsoever will be caused to the petitioner. In this order, the concerned Authority/ Respondent No.3 is simply directed to decide the matter in accordance with the directions of the Sub Divisional Officer after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned. 4. It is open to the petitioner to seek hearing before the concerned authority if he has concern with the matter. With these observations, review application is dismissed as no case for review is made out. [S. B. DESHMUKH, J.] [D. B. BHOSALE, J.] Dated:30/06/2011. ans/7756