IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1521 of 2006 UGO PASWAN Versus NARAYAN PASWAN & ORS ----------- 3. 5.12.2008 Heard Mr. Ram Kumar Sharma, learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. The view taken by the court below does not suffer from any jurisdictional error, inasmuch as a fresh application of execution after period of limitation was definitely not maintainable. The court below, however, itself has indicated that the remedy for the petitioner was to seek restoration of earlier Execution Case No. 2/1985 which was dismissed for default on 1.4.1989. That being so, when the court below itself has indicated the remedy for the petitioner, this Court will have no difficulty in dismissing the civil revision application. Accordingly, the same is dismissed with an observation that it would be open for the petitioner to seek restoration of the earlier execution case which was dismissed for default and in the 2 event such an application is filed, the same shall be considered in accordance with law. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/