IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 9524 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 28, 2011 Parth Tanwar ….Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Raghbir Chaudhary, Sr. DAG, Punjab, for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate, for the applicant. 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Mr. Rakesh Gupta, learned counsel, appearing for Inderjit Kaur wife of late Sh. Sukhpal Singh, resident of House No.5, Gurmukh Niwas, Bhupindra Road, Patiala, states that he has moved application for impleadment, which was returned with objection that memo of parties CWP No.9524 of 2011 has not been attached. He has requested to take up this CM today. Taken up on the Board. Application is allowed. Mrs. Inderjit Kaur is impleaded as respondent No.5. Main Petition Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the parties, have fairly stated that civil suit involving question of title and possession is already pending in the Court of Civil Judge, Patiala. Both the parties can agitate their respective titles and possession. Learned counsel for the parties have fairly stated that in view of the judgment of this Court in the matter of Shamsher Singh versus Commissioner, Patiala Division, Patiala and others, CWP No. 16338 of 2011, decided on 02.09.2011 present petition be disposed of with direction to Civil Court to decide the civil suit pending between the parties, at its own merit, in accordance with law, without being prejudiced by any observation/finding/decision passed in the impugned mutation proceedings. Present petition is disposed of with direction that civil suit shall be decided by the Civil Court, at its own merit, in accordance with law, without being prejudiced by any observation/finding/decision passed in the impugned 2 CWP No.9524 of 2011 orders. Any finding, observation or decision in the impugned orders shall not be taken as res judicata in the pending civil suit. Mutation shall be carried out as per the final decision in the civil suit. September 28, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 3