IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:768 of 2001 Between: Smt.Pyari Jan D/o.late Moulali, W/o.Karimullah situated at Santhagudipadi Village Rompicherla Mandal Guntur Dist ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chief Executive Officer, Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board, Manoranjan Complex, Block M4, MJ.Road, Nampally, Hyderabad 2 Shaik Galib S/o.Shaik Jangini Sab 24-23-42/A, Nallacheruvu Indiragandhi Nagar Guntur .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:NONE APPEARED Counsel for Respondent No.1:MR. S.M.SUBHANI The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for a writ of mandamus to set aside proceedings, dated 10.11.2000 issued by respondent No.1 whereby respondent No.2 was appointed as Muthawalli of Ashoorkhana situated at Santhagudipadu Village, Rompicherla Mandal, Guntur District. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. Under Section 83(2) of the Wakf Act, 1995 (for short ‘the Act’), any person aggrieved by an order passed under the Act is entitled to question the same before the Wakf Tribunal. The petitioner has not shown any reason before this Court to permit her to bypass the said remedy, which, undoubtedly, is an eﬀective alternative remedy. The law is well settled that ordinarily, this Court does not entertain a writ petition ﬁled bypassing an effective alternative remedy. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as provided under Section 83(2) of the Act. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 6th SEPTEMBER, 2008. kvni