SW.0^S}> <f^^^(?-^ :!^- ^ % ^ ^ ^»?-t i. ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G) W.P.(SINO. ^5^2) OF 2011 PETITIONER Vinod Rao Maratha, aged about 45 years, S/o Late shri Triambak Rao L\/i/)\^".^\ Bhosale, Shiksha Karmi Varg-111, ^fs^!^ ^, ^ —", 9.' .^"^ ^' ° ^ ^^ ^'^•"" ' .^'" RESPONDENTS Primary School Lakhram Block Bilha, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, General Administration Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Panchayat & Social welfare Department , Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA ^9 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON»BLEMR. JUSTICE PRITENKER DIWAKBR W.P.rsi.NO. 7353/2011 Petitioner Vinod Rao Maratha versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh 8s Others Shri K.S.Pawar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, P.L. for the State. ORDBR (C$12.2011) Grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that initially he was appointed on contract basis for the census work and thereafter circular was issued by the State Govemment for issuing regular appointment to such persons in the Government posts. Accordii-ig to the petitioner, number of similarly placed persons have been appointed as LDC/Assistant Grade-III whereas the petitioner has been appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III which is not a regular government post. He further submits that some of the persons who were initially appoiiited as Shiksha Karmi, later on they too were appointed on regular posts of LDC/Assistant Grade-III or equivalent to the said post but the case of the petitioner has not been considered. He submits that at this stage^ purpose of filing this petition would be ser^ed if direction is issued to fhe respondent No.3 to decide the pending representation (Annexure P/6) of the petitioner. State counsel submits that let the petitioner make a fresh detailed representation to the respondent No.3 and in turn the same would be decided in accordance with law. The present petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file fresh representation within two weeks from the date of reeeipt of copy of this order and in turn it is expected from the respondent N0.3 to decide the same as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. It 1s made clear that this court has not expressed atiy opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law. 1 Sd/- IpritinkerDiwaker 1 Judge