IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Interim Relief Application No.4977 of 2009 Misc. Application No.3259 of 2009 In WRIT PETITION No. 904 of 2009(M/S) Bhagwat Singh Bisht, Proprietor M/s Sarvodaya Printing Press, Kaladhungi, Nainital. ……Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Chief Secretary, Government of Uttarakhand, Dehradun. 2. Secretary Industry Department, Uttarakhand, Dehradun. 3. Director Udyog, Udyog Nideshalaya, Uttarakhand, Dehradun. 4. General Manager, District Industrial Center, Haldwani, District Nainital. ..Respondents. Sri M.C. Kandpal, Senior Advocate with Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. C.S.C. for the respondents. Date: - 19-03-2010 Hon’ble B.S. Verma J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 16-05-2009 passed by the General Manager, District Industrial Center, Haldwani, District Nainital annexed as annexure No.7 to the writ petition whereby District Industry Center has informed to the petitioner that 2 on your application, instruction has been sought from the directorate of the industry regarding subsidy. The application for subsidy was moved on 28-05-2008 and as per the District Industry Center, the scheme was valid upto 31-3-2007. The petitioner had filed this petition prior to received direction from the District Industry Center. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has filed the counter affidavit and it reveals from annexure No. 1 to the counter affidavit that the application of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground that the petitioner had not applied within the stipulated period mentioned in the scheme. The present writ petition has become infructuous. Now, since, the final order has been passed. The petitioner would be at liberty to assail the order passed by the District level committee on 18-12-2009 by filing a fresh writ petition whereby it has been held that the petitioner is not entitled for subsidy. With the said direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. (B.S. Verma, J.) 19-03-2010 MK