1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :: J U D G M E N T :: S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.4554/2001 [S.R. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL & ANR.VS. STATE & ORS.] Date of Judgment : 04.04.2008. HON'BLE MR. MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, J. Mr.M.S.Singhvi for the petitioner. ***** This writ petition is preferred with a prayer for release of grant-in-aid on the approved expenditure for year 1999-2000 and a further prayer is made for payment of arrears of the approved expenditure for the year 1993-1999 also. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that a similar matter was decided by the Court on 25.10.2007 wherein following directions were given:- “[1] on the arrears of salary paid by it to its employees as a result of revisions of pay scales in accordance with the Rajasthan Civil Services (Revised Pay Scales) Rules, 1998; [2] on arrear of dearness allowance to its employees as a result of grant of additional installments of dearness allowance; 2 [3] on the amount of selection grades admissible to the employees under order dated 25.01.1992 issued by the State Government prescribing for grant of selection grades [4] on leave encashment for which the employees are entitled at par with employees of the State Government.” Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that prayer in the writ petition are based on inspection report only, which otherwise does create any right in favour of the petitioners. It is fact that what has been prayed in the writ petition is nothing but to get payment of approved expenditure of grant-in-aid. It is otherwise a fact that Government has to take final decision to make the payment of grant in aid to the extent, the accounts of the petitioners are approved. However, even after inspection of the accounts, Government is setting over the matter which cannot be said to be proper. Thus, respondents are directed to take a final decision in that record within a month. In view of the above, respondents are directed to take a decision for release grant aid amount in favour of the petitioner to the extent it approved and pass necessary order. 3 With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that if grievances of the petitioner is not satisfied then he would be at liberty to file fresh writ petition. (MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI), J. mamta