IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No 3239 of 2003 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- NAYAN AMRUT VAGHELA Versus STATE OF GJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Criminal Misc.Application No. 3239 of 2003 MR SHAKEEL A QURESHI for Petitioner No. 1 MR. V.M.PANCHOLI, APP for Respondent No. 1 MR DEVANG T SHAH for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA Date of decision: 08/07/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr. Shakeel A Qureshi, learned advocate of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Mr. V.M.Pancholi, learned APP appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 State of Gujarat has no objection if leave as prayed for is granted. Hence, leave to withdraw the petition is granted. Petition stands rejected as it is withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Ad interim relief granted at the time of issuing rule shall stand vacated. (A.M.Kapadia,J) Jayanti*