IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.645 of 2009 PARAS CHAMAR & ORS. Versus DHANANJAY DHANUK & ORS. ----------- 3. 28.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. By the impugned order, the learned appellate court has reversed the order of the learned trial court rejecting the petition under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the defendants and has ordered the parties to maintain status quo. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in case the plaintiffs are in dire need of money for their personal necessity, they will be compelled to sell the properties and, therefore, in that situation the status quo order shall come in their way. It goes without saying that in case the plaintiffs-petitioners have reasonable cause for need of money, they will be at liberty to file a petition before the court below for permission to sell specific property as per their need. So far as this revision application is - 2 - concerned, I do not find any merit in the application and the same is dismissed. B.T (J.N Singh, J)