:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 721 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 721 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 721 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUIT NO. 246 OF 1997 SUIT NO. 246 OF 1997 SUIT NO. 246 OF 1997 Mr. Sameer G. Narvekar .....Plffs. vs. Om Siddhi co-op Hsg. Soc. Ltd and oars. .....Defnds. Simil Purohit a/w. V.B. Dhawan for the plaintiffs. Ms. Shobha C. Kavnekar holding for Uma. G. Wagle for defendant no.1 and 3 to 5. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 27th October, 2005. P.C. :. 1. By consent of the parties the motion is taken up for hearing forthwith and called out. 2. For the reasons set out in the affidavit in :2: support and the affidavit of advocate case sought to be made out on personal ground. But I do not find any merits in such a case because the advocate on, record was one Mr. Dhawan and there was no personal difficulty on his part to attend the matter. The learned counsel for the plaintiffs states that in the interest of justice the matter be restored even on payment of heavy cost. In that view of the matter I am inclined to take a lenient view. Learned counsel for the defendant has no objection. Motion is therefore made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). However the plaintiff is directed to pay cost quantified at Rs.15,000/- within a period of two weeks from today to the Maharashtra Legal Aid Authorities. . Motion disposed off accordingly. Suit restored. No order as to costs. sd/- ********