IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37499 of 2011 ====================================================== Arvind Pandey, s/o Janardan Pandey. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== 3 02-12-2011 This case has been brought at the instance of the office under the heading “to be mentioned”. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to inadvertent mistake in the prayer portion of bail application the name of Sri Deepak Kumar, J.M., Ist Class, Jehanabad” has wrongly been typed in place of “ C.J.M., Jehanabad”. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the bail application in course of the day. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel, it appears that in the second paragraph of order dated 15.11.2011, due to inadvertent mistake in the prayer portion of bail application, the name of “Sri Deepak Kumar, J.M., Ist Class, Jehanabad” has wrongly been typed in place of “ C.J.M., Jehanabad”. In that view of the matter, the order dated 15.11.2011 is modified only to the extent that in place “Sri Deepak Kumar, J.M., Ist Class, Jehanabad” should be read as “C.J.M., Jehanabad”. Bhardwaj/- (Prakash Chandra Verma, J)