1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 6050/2007 (Sharad Sulab Shinde VERSUS State of Maharashtra, thro. its Secretary & others ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Funde, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 15, 2008. Heard. The writ petition is directed against impugned communication dated 19.10.2006 whereby the services of the petitioner as Muster Assistant came to be terminated. The said order was challenged before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal by the petitioner by filing Original Application No.34/2007, however, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the said original application with liberty to avail alternate remedy. The permission was granted by the Tribunal vide order dated 23.02.2007 and disposed of the original application. In view of the above referred facts and circumstances, it is difficult for us to show any indulgence since the impugned communication is based on the earlier order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal as well as 2 Executive Engineer, P.W.D. Division Bhandara and none of these orders are either impugned before us or those orders are at any point of time altered or modified by any authority. Hence, the petition suffers from lack of merit, the same is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE APTE