1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3873 OF 2009 Sanjay s/o Vishwanath Kadam ...Petitioner VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents ..... Shri H.I.Pathan, advocate for the petitioner Shri R.P.Phatake, A.G.P. for respondent no.1 Shri V.D.Hon, advocate for respondent no.2 Shri V.D.Gunale, advocate for respondent no.3 ..... CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, JJ. DATED : 10th December, 2010 PER COURT : 1 This is a Motion for speaking to minutes. 2 Heard Shri Pathan, learned counsel for the petitioner. 3 Para 2 of our order dated 22.11.2010 shall be read as under :- 2 " Petitioner Sanjay and respondent no.3 Bali herein claim to be the sons of Vishwanath, who retired from the services of Municipal Council. It is stated that Vishwanath had two wives and petitioner Sanjay is the son of second wife and respondent no.3 Bali is son of first wife. " 4 Corrected writ be issued. 5 Motion stands disposed of. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (NARESH H.PATIL, J.) dbm/wp3873.09