IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 15.02.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.47245 of 2006 (T) (O.A.No.5780 of 1999) Ameena ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Secretary to Government, Home Police III Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2. The Director General of Police, Chennai-4. 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Coimbatore Range. ..Respondents Original Application No.5780 of 1999 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal praying to direct the respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner for inclusion of her name in the 'C' list of Sub Inspectors of Police fit for promotion as Inspectors of Police for the year 1998-99 and promote her as Inspector of Police and grant her all consequential service and monetary benefits. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. For Petitioner : Mr.S.K.Krishnan for Mr.M.Muthappan For Respondents : Mr. B. Vijay Government Advocate O R D E R Original Application No.5780 of 1999 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal praying to direct the respondent to consider the claim of the applicant for inclusion of her name in the 'C' list of Sub Inspectors of Police fit for promotion as Inspectors of Police for the year 1998-99 and promote her as https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Inspector of Police and grant her all consequential service and monetary benefits. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. 2. The applicant/petitioner, a 43 years old Woman Sub Inspector of Police, seeks the above stated relief. Her claim was deferred for the reason that there was disciplinary proceeding pending as against her at the relevant point of time. 3. Heard Mr.B.Vijay, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, who referred to the reply affidavit filed by the respondents and stated that the pendency of the two charge memos was the reason for non consideration of the petitioner's claim. 4. In view of the reply filed by the respondents and also in view of Clause (iv) of the G.O.Ms.No.368 Personal and Administrative Reforms Department dated 18.10.1993, the relief sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted. Accordingly, the same was deferred by the respondents. The non-inclusion is justified. Finding no merits, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar ts To 1. The Secretary to Government, Home Police III Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2. The Director General of Police, Chennai-4. 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Coimbatore Range. + 1 c.c. to Mr. T. Ayngaraprabhu, Advocate. S.R.No.9952. + 1 c.c. to The Government Pleader. S.R.No.10256. W.P.No.47245 of 2006 SV (CO) GSK 04.03.2010. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/