- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.421 OF 2003 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.836 OF 1999 ... Eena Shyamlal ...Plaintiff v/s. Vimla R. Gupta & Ors. ...Defendants ... Mr.Jaydeep Mitra i/b T.N.Tripathi for the Plaintiff. Mrs.Rekha Safari for Defendants Nos. 1 to 4. Mr.Rajiv Narula i/b D.S.Shekhawat for Defendant No.5. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 20TH FEBRUARY,2007 P.C.: 1. The suit of the Plaintiff is based on two bills of exchange of which the Defendant No.1 is drawer and - 2 - the Defendants Nos. 2 & 5 are the acceptors. Defendants Nos. 3 & 4 have signed the undertaking to repay the amount advanced by the Plaintiff. Defendant No.1 had also issued a cheque dated 18-12-1999 for repayment of the amount. 2. The defence of the Defendants is of plain denial. Defendant No.1, however, did not dispute her signature on the cheque. Other Defendants also did not dispute their signatures on the document which have been relied upon. Defendants absolutely have no defence to offer. They are not entitled to leave to defend. Plaintiff, therefore, is entitled to judgment. 3. Summons for judgment is, therefore, granted. Suit of the Plaintiff is decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b) of the suit. Refund of court fees as per rules. ...