IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.117 OF 2010 1. INDRASAN DEVI, WIFE OF LATE RAM SHRESTHA MISHRA 2. SHIVAKANT MISHRA, SON OF LATE RAM SHRESTHA MISHRA BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TEPRI, POLICE STATION PIYAR, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR …………………………………………………………………………….PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RITU DEVI, WIFE OF UMAKANT MISHRA @ SONA MISHRA, DAUGHTER OF BAIDYANATH PATHAK, PRESENT RESIDING AT MOHALLA B.M.P. COLONY, POLICE STATION MITHANPURA, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR ………………………………………………………………………OPPOSITE PARTIES ********* 2 03/05/2010 Heard Counsel for the petitioners and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that earlier a case was instituted on behalf of the father-in-law of the Opposite Party No. 2 that his son had been kidnapped. In the said complaint case, cognizance was taken on 21.11.2008. Learned Counsel further submits that the present case under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code has been filed on 29.11.2007 whereas the case of kidnapping has been filed earlier on 24.04.2007. At this stage, the Court cannot interfere with the order taking cognizance in view of the fact that the matter has to be thoroughly examined before coming to the conclusion that one or the other version of the case is true or false. This application is accordingly disposed of. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)