HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4125 of 2000 Date: September 15, 2011 Between: 1. Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition Officer, Unit IV, Jangareddygudem, West Godavari District & another. … Petitioners And Edala Pothuraju … Respondent * * * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4125 of 2000 O R D E R: The petitioners have preferred this revision against order dated 26.7.2000 passed in E.P. No.248 of 1997 in O.P. No.86 of 1985 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Eluru (executing court), directing attachment to the extent of E.P. claim made as per the revised calculation memos. 2. This Court, by order dated 13.11.2001, granted interim stay on condition of the petitioners depositing the entire decretal amount within a period of six weeks and a default clause was also provided. The learned Government Pleader for Arbitration is not in a position to state whether the amount as directed was deposited or not. 3. It is noticed from the orders of the executing court that revised calculation memos were directed to be filed by the decree holder in conformity with the ratio of the judgment of the Supreme Court i n Sunder v . Union of India[1]. After the revised calculation memos were filed, the executing court waited for the judgment debtor to take steps for deposit of amount and ultimately ordered attachment as no steps were taken. I, therefore, do not find any error in the order passed by the executing court impugned herein. 4. It was represented that the issue involved in the present revision is also the subject matter of A.S. No.2937 of 2000 pending before this Court. Registry has put up the Xerox copy of the judgment dated 20th February 2003 passed by this Court in A.S. No.2807 of 2000 and batch dismissing the appeal. Further, similar C.R.P. Nos.4123, 4126 and 4127 of 2001 which were said to be pending were also found disposed of by this Court long back. 5. In view of the fact that this C.R.P. is dismissed, however, the petitioners are granted six weeks time from today to deposit the amounts covered by the impugned order, if the said amounts are not so far deposited. The executing court shall thereafter proceed with the execution in accordance with law. ___________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J Date: September 15, 2011. BSB [1] (2001) 7 SCC 211