IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17040 of 2011 Bhesh Narain Pandey, S/o Late Kishun Deo Pandey, Village Pritampur, P.O. Tengara, P.S. Barun, District Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development Department, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna- 800015. 3. The Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Provident Fund Officer, Jehanabad. 5. The Director, General Provident Fund Directorate, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 6. The District Education Officer, Jehanabad. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 28.9.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in paragraph-4 of the writ petition so far as place of High School is concerned in course of the day. Heard Shri Amrendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri T. Rajesh, learned A.C. to G.P.6, who appears on behalf of all the respondents/State. The petitioner, who retired on 30.4.2010 as Assistant Teacher from High School, Sarta, Jehanabad, has made a limited prayer for directing the respondents to re-calculate the interest on the G.P.F. amount and thereafter, pay the same to the petitioner. It has been submitted that all the retiral dues of the 2 petitioner have already been paid, but interest on G.P.F. amount was not properly calculated. The petitioner, for his claim raised in the present writ petition, has also filed representation before respondent no.4/District Provident Fund Officer, Jehanabad. However, neither any decision has been taken on his representation nor payment of claimed interest has been made. In view of the facts and circumstances, the court is of the opinion that instead of keeping the writ petition pending, it is desirable to dispose it of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation along with calculation chart before respondent no.4 within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.4 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If the respondent no.4 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, 3 respondent no.4 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within three months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)