AMENDED PETITION IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHTTISGARH, AT -BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) N0. 57^2 OF 2008 PETITIONER RESPONDENT YOGENDRASAHU- AGED - 41 YEARS, . S/0 SHRI GOVIND RAM SAHU WORKING AS - FOREST RANGE OFFICER, AT - FOREST RANGE, PALI, FOREST DIVISION, KATGHORA, DISTRICT - KORBA (:C. G.) VERSUS 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH. - THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, MANTRALAYA, D. K. S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR 2. SHRI N. L. AGRAWAL, FOREST RANGE OFFICER, FOREST RANGE, CHHUIKHADAN, FOREST DIVISI'ON, KHAIRAGARH, DISTRICT - RAJNANDGAON (C. G.) 3. STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER, THROUGH -.THE STATE ELECTION OFFICER, D'K.S. Bhawan, RAIPUR (C.G.) r 4. SHRIH.B. KHAN, FOREST RANGE OFFICER, PALI, FOREST DIVISION, KATGHORA, DISTRICT - KORBA (C. G.) Writ Petition Under Article - 226 of the Constitution of India ,,,-v -^ XI-HC—78 ^^ ^T ^14) ^CT ^ff^T^iN? T '3^r -<.n^!<>i^, ^tfl<-i<re, $^<?ii-H3<. ST7 °i^ *11*1CT( Qt^TcK ••^200^ 3TT^?T '<T?RR' ( ^^^) ^^TW^T^T^T SB: Hon. JVIr. JustEce 30.06.2009: Shri R.K. Kesharwahi Shri Yashwant Singt No.l/State. Shri P.S. Koshy co^nsel Challenge in this order dated 13.10.200$ respondent No.1 bywhich{tffi Forest Range Pali Di| Chhuikhadan, District petition, another order wa^ on 9.11.2008 (Annexure F|- Commission posting res| place of respondent No.3 position remains that Chhuikhadan, respondenjl respondent No.2 is workin^ Counse! forthe petil would iike to wsthdraw suitable representation to grievance as has b'een rai; counsel for the for respondent No.4. p^tition is to the impugned transfer responden|/State ^p^pft^r ^w<i? ^f Fs^l ^i^i< ^?^ifim3?i^T ritinker Diwaker i counsel for the petitioner. Thakur Dy.AG for the respondent (Annexure P-10) issued by te petitioner was transferred from i^trict Korba to Forest Range F^ajnandgaon. After filing of the passed by the State Government F|-14) at the instance of the Eiection tondent No.4 Shri H.B. Khan in ^ Shri N.L. Agrawal at Pali, The the petitioner is working at snjt No.4 is working at Paii and at Bilaspur. tioner submits that at this stage he tpiis petition with iiberty to make I'espondent No.1 apprising it of his i^ed in the present petition. To this, has no objection. T ]f f/ "•^y ^^^.^•" —^— XI-HC—78 'S^T '^T*ll^l<-|, %?Tft'H<T<S, [sKflra^C ^m^ff (biicb •^200 ^n^r TPNT (^f^^f) W^[ ^ fc;iic}i ^H ^TT^T s^^ien o^ IPRTTW^f^ 3??^T ^i<<i<y{4)fi Hwcil^f !k^ <f^^K ^^{RWW^T Accordingiy, the ^etition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as afores|aid. If the petitioner makes a representation to the autl three weeks from toda accordance with the adn|iinistrative requirements keeping In view the grievance of th6 four weeks from the date lorities concerned within a period of /, the same shaii be decided in petitioner, within a further period of of its receipt. „_- - Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge