IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal First Bail Application No.1144 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Shafique ……….Applicants (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party ________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.1608/09 U/Ss 420/467/468/471/120-B and 181 IPC, P.S. New Tehri, Distt. Tehri Garhwal Dated: November 23, 2009 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Pradeep Hairiya, Adv. i/b Mr. Rajendra Kotiyal, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. GA fo r the State. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the co- accused Musharaf Ali has been released on bail by this Court on 5.11.2009 and in the FIR, the role of the present applicant is similar to that of co-accused Musharaf Ali who has been released on bail. Therefore, on the basis of parity the present applicant deserves bail. After considering all the facts and circumstances, on hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the contents of the FIR and other material on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant-Shafique be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Tehri Garhwal. The bail application is disposed of accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 23.11.2009 Rajeev Dang