IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 25.10.2010 COCP No.468 of 2010 Raghbir Sharan Sharma ...Petitioner Versus Smt. Kiran Devi and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondents. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Mr. Chauhan has produced statement of calculations of the amount paid to the petitioner in the Court today. The same is taken on record. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner disputes such calculations. The question; whether the payments have been properly made to the petitioner or not, cannot be gone into a contempt petition. It is open to the petitioner to seek the remedy as may be available to the petitioner in accordance with law in respect of balance amount, if any due and payable to the petitioner. With the said observations, the present contempt petition is disposed of. Rule discharged. 25.10.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE