1 CP 133 to 154 of 2010 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.133 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6639 OF 2009 Narayan P Bhoir .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.134 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6640 OF 2009 Smt. Draupadi P Mhatre .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.135 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6641 OF 2009 Smt. Fashibai K Bhoir .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.136 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6642 OF 2009 Shri.Abdul Gafur Teli .. Petitioner 2 CP 133 to 154 of 2010 -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.137 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6643 OF 2009 Shri. Abdul Gafur Teli .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.138 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6644 OF 2009 Shri Namdeo Balaram Popeta .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.139 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6645 OF 2009 Shri.Namdeo Balaram Popeta .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.140 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6646 OF 2009 Shri. Namdeo Popeta .. Petitioner 3 CP 133 to 154 of 2010 -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.141 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6647 OF 2009 Shri. Dadu Balaram Patil .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.142 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6648 OF 2009 Shri. Tulshiram G Patil .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.143 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6649 OF 2009 Keshav Maruti Bhoir .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.144 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6650 OF 2009 4 CP 133 to 154 of 2010 Shri. Ananta Ganpat Patil .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.145 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6651 OF 2009 Shri. Batat Shaniwar Patil .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.146 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6651 OF 2009 Shri. Baliram P Kudavkar .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.147 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6653 OF 2009 Shri.Janu K Ghoparkar .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH 5 CP 133 to 154 of 2010 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.148 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6654 OF 2009 Shri. Krishna Joma Khutarkar .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.149 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6655 OF 2009 Shri. Bhagwan Raghunath Bhoir .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.150 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6656 OF 2009 Shri. Janardan Bama Patil .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.151 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6657 OF 2009 Shri. Gurunath Trimbak Bhopi .. Petitioner -versus 6 CP 133 to 154 of 2010 The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.152 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6658 OF 2009 Krishna Namaji Chikhalekar .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.153 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6659 OF 2009 Smt. Nagibai Sindhu Patil .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.154 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6808 OF 2009 Smt. Changunabai Dattu Naik .. Petitioner -versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondent. Mr. S. G. Surana, for the Petitioners in all petitions. Ms. M.M. Bane, AGP for respondent Nos 1 to 4. CORAM: RANJIT MORE, J. DATED: 1st April, 2011 P.C. 7 CP 133 to 154 of 2010 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners state that the order in respect of which contempt was alleged is already complied with by the respondent and therefore, seeks leave to withdraw these contempt petitions. Leave is granted and contempt petitions are disposed of, as withdrawn. (RANJIT MORE, J.)