IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.155 of 2004 STATE OF BIHAR & ANR Versus CHANDRA SHEKHAR PRASAD & ORS ----------- 3/ 19/03/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. Noticing that the petitioner was put under suspension on 4.3.1996, he retired on 31.1.1997 till which date the departmental proceedings had not been completed, but was converted into a proceeding under Section-43B of the Bihar Pension Rules, this Court on 6.4.2004 directed payment of salary for the period of suspension when the departmental proceedings were not interfered with. Learned counsel for the petitioners in this review application submits that one day prior to the order in the writ petition i.e. 5.4.2004 the departmental proceedings had been completed which could not be brought to the attention of the Court. Even if the contention be correct, no proceedings were concluded and final orders passed before superannuation on 31.1.1997. That was the reason that this Court had directed payment of salary for the period of suspension as there could be no suspension operating after superannuation. The direction for salary was in light of the failure of the 2 respondents to complete the proceedings in the service tenure of the delinquent. No ground for review is made out in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)