-.^ OF JUDICAru'RE AT BELASPUR (C.G.) W.P.NO. ^^^^-OF 2002 ^-^v i^^ ^••t;/\.<5N' ^'"'A ..^ ^' ^'w Sharma, S/Q. Late Shri Rain Pravesh Shamia. about 44 years Oceapatioit-Asstt. StatisticaIOfficer, Office pnfae Distdct Office, ,,Pa8iehayat fflid Social Welfare, Janjgir Champa^ R/o. LIG 46 Housmg CQtooy, Devri Khurd, Bilaspur (C.G-), Versus : I) ofChhattisg.am Througii Chief Secretary D^.S BhawaiL. Raipur(C.G.) : 2) Secretar^^ & Rural Deveopnictit Govemment ofChhattisgarh DX.S Bhawae^ Secretariat Raipur(C.G.) : 3) Secretar$r SociatY^cliMe Go'v'emment ofChhattisgarfa D.K.S Bhawa£4Secretadat Raipur(C.G.) : 4) .Secfetary (Fmmice) QI Chhattisgarh D.K.S Bhawa]^ Secretariat Raipur(C.G.) : 5) jomtDircctor(Admmis1ratiQn) Soeial Welface Directorate £>^SBfaawacL Secretariat Raipur(C.G.) ^ > ^ PETITION LTNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FQRISSU.4NCE OF .ApPROPMATE WRITS/ DIP^CTIONS/ ,:l XI-HC-22 ^T^T^T Wi^ 3Ti^T 4 5h^i<^ ^rficT :|' ^ -+- ~3~^ v^s^{<ri43, ^t^T^, 'f^TRTy \u- •P. NC>.225~7, ••M/ 200 'WW?ITWW^' f^^F' 3T[^F ^^?I^R Tif^T 2.1.2003 Smt Haaiida Siddque, co^nsel for the petitk>ner. Shri Saajay K. Agarwal, Qepuly Advoc^te General for fhe State. Heard. In view of fhe limited natijupe of prayer made at fhe time of hearmg on the question of adiai^sioii fhe Coitrt is of the opitdoxi that no useful purpose would jbe served in keqping this writ petitioii pendiag as the sam^ admission stage with a suitable ^ircctions. As it appears fix>m fhe re^ord the petitioner wa^ allocated to tbe State of Madhya Prades^ mutual appUcatbn for traasfer OJfficer, Tribal Welfarc, who was Departxaent of Paachayat and biftircated, as alleged, iato tw^ "Paachayat aiid RuraA Developn^ent^ aad <'Panchayat and Social Welfare Departcaenf9. Accordia^ prejudiced by the act of fhe op|K>site party who has passed the order of promotion ia favour of submitted a reprcsentation copjf writ petition t©fhe conceni^d officers for consideration and '^T^f^iN "RTH^f ^ 1^T^ir iN^K -^3^|q^7^T can be disposed of at the aiid subsequently by woy of a jhe was aBocated to fhe State of Chhattisgarh in place of Shj|i Nigam, Assistaat Statistical |dlocated to Madhya Pradcsh. Adinittedly, fhe petitioi|ier was ioittaUy uader fhe ^ocial Welfere, which has been iiidependent departaients i,e. to fhe petitiotier, he has been fhe juniors ignoring his claim aad fhat he has also iiot b^en giv^n a suitable posting, According to the petitiouer, aggjrieved with tfae iUegal action he whereofis Annexure P/2 to the [^i^fe^ XI-HC-22 ^T^T^? ^i.cr) 3T}i^F ^^icft "tf^ -< ^^ 1^[Tqi^PT, ^fte^, f^T^y , , ^S^W*^W ^^^ ^^ 200 '3n^i ^^TT^: ^rit^r which haviag not been Court for relief. consid^red, he has approached tihis Siace the representation 4as been mov^d wltich has not been considered as aUeged the directmg the respondents no, 1, to consider fhe petitioner's repre|sentatk>n aod pass appn>pnate oiders within a period of fhi|£e xnonths j&om fhe date of coxmniinication/supply of certffi^d copy of fte order. It is made clear that fhe Court is not expre| of fhe petitioner^s case or hi^ concemed aufhority shaU con^id^ ^N^fj^ 'HTCif ^ ft^ ^N^R ^3?i^R^i?^i ^rit petition is disposed of by 2 aDd/or 3 as the case may be, ^sing aiiy bpmion on fhe merits rcpresentation aiid thiat fhe ffae same on its own ixierit. Wifh the above observatjons and dircctk>ns, the writ •? petition staads disposed of, { Consequently, M.W.P.No. 1312/2002 for interim also staa^s disposed of. Certffied copy as per rtdes, Sd/- P.C. Naik Judge [^NF^T^^ •s^