IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36738 of 2008 NITYA NAND MANJHI @ NITYANAND KUMAR & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.11.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State as also the learned Counsel for the informant. A police case was registered originally under the bailable Sections of the Penal Code to which Section 307 was added subsequently. The submission is that the allegations are general and omnibus in a petty dispute. Counsel for the informant submits that for the dispute there is case and counter case and in the counter case the informant and others have been enlarged on regular bail. In the given nature of allegations when both sides are alleged to have assaulted each other in a petty dispute, one set of which has been granted regular bail, no special circumstances have been urged to accord a privileged treatment to the present petitioners, the application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merit including grant of regular bail to co-accused in the counter case without being prejudiced by the present order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)