IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 8962 of 2001 Between: 1 Ch.Sadanand, S/o Jangaiah R/o 8-1-136/143 The House of the Petitioner are situatedat Maruthinagar Colo Shaikpet Village & Mandal, Hyderabad District. 2 Sidda Satyanarayana s/o Bhoomaiah R/o 8-1-136/7A The House of the Petitioner are situatedat Maruthinagar Colo Shaikpet Village & Mandal, Hyderabad District. 3 Kolla Venkatesam S/o Nagaiah R/o 8-1-136/136 The House of the Petitioner are situatedat Maruthinagar Colo Shaikpet Village & Mandal, Hyderabad District. 4 Sarojini Bai w/o Yadaiah R/o 8-1-136/81 The House of the Petitioner are situatedat Maruthinagar Colo Shaikpet Village & Mandal, Hyderabad District. 5 P.Sharada Bai W/o Balaiah R/o 8-1-136/148 The House of the Petitioner are situatedat Maruthinagar Colo Shaikpet Village & Mandal, Hyderabad District. 6 Sidda Swarupa W/o Ramesh R/o 8-1-136/40/A The House of the Petitioner are situatedat Maruthinagar Colo Shaikpet Village & Mandal, Hyderabad District. 7 K.Janardhan Reddy A/o K.Laxma Reddy, R/o 8-1-136/31/B The House of the Petitioner are situatedat Maruthinagar Colo Shaikpet Village & Mandal, Hyderabad District. 8 K.Eshwari W/o Yadagiri R/o 8-1-136/82 The House of the Petitioner are situatedat Maruthinagar Colo Shaikpet Village & Mandal, Hyderabad District. 9 Dr.Yuvaraj Singh S/o Satyanarayana R/o 8-1-136/138 The House of the Petitioner are situatedat Maruthinagar Colo Shaikpet Village & Mandal, Hyderabad District. 10 K.Narayan Reddy S/o K.Laxma Reddy, R/o 8-1-136/26/P The House of the Petitioner are situatedat Maruthinagar Colo Shaikpet Village & Mandal, Hyderabad District. 11 T.Yettamma, W/o Jagadeshwar, R/o 8-1-136/29 The House of the Petitioner are situatedat Maruthinagar Colo Shaikpet Village & Mandal, Hyderabad District. 12 J.Vishnu Kumar S/o Venkaiah R/o 8-1-136/34 The House of the Petitioner are situatedat Maruthinagar Colo Shaikpet Village & Mandal, Hyderabad District. 13 N.Rajamma, W/o Lakshmaiah R/o 8-1-136/85 The House of the Petitioner are situatedat Maruthinagar Colo Shaikpet Village & Mandal, Hyderabad District. 14 V.Rama Rao, S/o Manikya Rao, R/o 8-1-136/23 The House of the Petitioner are situatedat Maruthinagar Colo Shaikpet Village & Mandal, Hyderabad District. 15 G.Naga Lakshmi W/o Yadaiah R/o 8-1-136/23 The House of the Petitioner are situatedat Maruthinagar Colo Shaikpet Village & Mandal, Hyderabad District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Mandal Revenue Officer, Shaikpet Mandal, Banjara Hills Hyderabad District. 2 District Collector Hyderabad District. 3 Station House Officer, P.S.Golconda, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents dt: 8-4-2001 threatening to demolish and dispossess the petitioenrs from their houses as illegal, arbitrary, viiolative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to demolish the petitioner house bearing Nos.H.NO.8-1-136/A/143; 8-1-136/A/7A; 8-1-136/A/136; 8-1-136/A/81; 8-1-136/A/148; 8-1-136/A/40/A; 8-1- 136/A/31/B; 8-1-136/A/82; 8-1-136/A/138; 8-1-136/A/136/A/26/P; 8-1- 136/A/29; 8-1-136/A/34; 8-1-136/A/85; 8-1-136/A/5; and 8-1- 136/A/23; situated at Marthinagar Colony, Shaikpet Village and Mandal, without following the due process of las, Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MOHD.ZIA-UL-HAQ Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.8962 of 2001 O R D E R: Since none appeared for the petitioners on 04.11.2008, this writ petition was directed to be listed for dismissal today. Today, though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither is the counsel for the petitioners present nor is there any representation on their behalf. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J 5th November, 2008. PNV