THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.22686 of 1995 Dated:14.11.2006 Between T.Subba Rao. …..Petitioner and 1.Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Visakhapatnam and Another. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.22686 of 1995 ORDER: It appears that during pendency of I.D.No.75 of 1987 before the 1st respondent-Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Visakhapatnam, a settlement was entered into between the petitioner- workman and the 2nd respondent-Management. The 2nd respondent-Management had offered certain amounts towards compensation, for which, the petitioner has agreed. Subsequently, the petitioner filed I.A.No.240 of 1993 in the said ID stating that the compensation offered by the 2nd respondent- management was not properly calculated and he was entitled to a sum of Rs.3,75,433/- and not Rs.2,24,684/-. But, no enquiry was conducted on the said application. Subsequently, the 1st respondent passed award as per the settlement entered into between the parties. I am of the opinion that once having entered into comprise with the 2nd respondent- Management, it is not proper on the part of the petitioner to dispute the same issue before the Labour Court or this Court. Writ petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. _________ 14-11-2006 rkk