IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.2357 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 6.7.2010 Om Parkash ....Petitioner Versus Ram Phal and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 17.2.2010 by which his prayer for amendment of the plaint has been disallowed. He being the plaintiff had pleaded that he is owner of the suit property which is ancestral in nature. By way of amendment he wants to introduce a sale deed which he allegedly was not aware of which would also fortify the fact that he is indeed the owner of the property. The prayer for amendment has been disallowed since it was filed at the appellate stage and also for the reason that the petitioner apparently had the knowledge of the existence of such a document. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have perused the material on record. In the opinion of this Court it is not necessary to amend the pleadings in view of the fact that the essentials of the case set up by the petitioner already exist in the plaint. The document C.R.No.2357 of 2010 (O&M) -2- that he wishes to introduce can be done by making an appropriate application before the appellate court to bring on record as a measure of evidence. No ground to interfere. Dismissed. 6.7.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss