IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1220 OF PETITION NO.1220 OF PETITION NO.1220 OF 2006 Radheshyam Kanojia ..Petitioner Vs. Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Manish Mistry i/b. M.P.Vashi for the petitioner Ms. A.K. Savla, for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Amjad Sayyed for Respondent NO.3. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: DATE: DATE: 13TH NOVEMBER,2006 13TH NOVEMBER,2006 13TH NOVEMBER,2006 P.C. . It is the case of the petitioner that against the order of respondent Corporation rejecting the application for regularisation he has preferred an Appeal before the State Government which is pending. Though the petitioner applied for stay no stay had been granted. As the respondent No.1 threatened to take action the petitioner approached this Court. On 24th August, 2006 this Court was pleased to grant ad-interim order in terms of prayer clause (c). Considering the above we continue the ad-interim order in terms of prayer clause (c) pending the final disposal of the Appeal by the State Government. We direct the State Government to dispose of the pending appeal within 3 months from today. With the above observation petition stands disposed of. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA J). V. MOHTA J). V. MOHTA J).