IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28626 of 2009 Dinkar Kumar Jha, son of Shyam Nandan Jha, resident of Village- Raghunathpur, Madhuban, P.S. Maniari, District- Muzaffarpur. …………………………… Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ………………………Opposite Party. ----------- 7. 29. 03. 2010. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard Mr. Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. N. Diwakar, learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No. 83/08, registered under Sections 366 and 366 A of the Indian Penal Code. According to the prosecution case, Sushmita Kumari, daughter of the informant had gone to M.D.D.M. College, Muzaffarpur and from there she is still traceless since 10. 03. 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that save and except some suspicion, there is no legal material to connect the petitioner with the offence in question. Only basis of suspicion is that mobile number of the petitioner has been mentioned on the copy of the victim girl. Since 2008, till date the victim girl is still traceless. Despite direction of this Court, no specific whereabout of the victim girl has been disclosed till date. 2 In the aforesaid background, this Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is dismissed. The petitioner must surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and, if so advised, seek regular bail. If such a petition is filed, then the same may be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. m.p. (Birendra Prasad Verma,J.)