^-H%78 ^SiS ^^ <\>-' j U'-\^ ••„•>-'' ^CTf ^i«irt<<,ynl'H'K., ficiKi^ tTF(ciTa»TT^ ^.CS2^..^^.;^200 •'ai^sTtRiR-iitii ?rai3n^?i!hMi<b Sff^ST tR^ ('jlclijcl.si) ¥R1T8R^lffel3(I^?T PBTITIONER Prabh{»Ram Verma, S/o Late Shri Bhatpariha, aged ^ibout -21 ycars,~R/o ViUage Koliha, Post Bagbojoda, Baloda Bazar, District Raipitr (CG) Versus RB8PONDENTS 1. State o1 Works DistricD 3. Execut^ve Engineer, PuttUc Works Department, BalodajBazar, Dinsion, Distorict Raipur (CG) Sub Dijrisional OfGcer, Public Works Department, Sub Di^ision, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (CG) Writ Petitioa uader Artitde 286 ofthe Constitutloa of Indta S.B Hoa'ble SIui DhiTendt^ 11.11. coiutsel Shri Suiul Otwaxu, Smt. Siaita Ghai, PL foi| aagn^aa dependjant The father of tfae workiag as permanent gaagn petitioner, beiug the 27.5.2008 (Amiexure P/2) for Accorduig to learaed aufhorities bave not taken appUcation/letter dated 27.5. ftie State policy, fhe coiapassiauate basis. *l'i|)rid)'111»fdT^'I.SK:l'([ut't^K sR aif^H 3ir^?i Chliattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, PubUc Departtaeat, DKS Bhawan, Mantcalaya, Raipur (CG) MisIttSkJ. for fhe petitioner. theState. ueltlfiioner naanety Late Shri Bhatpariha, i, died on 10.4.2008 ia hamess. The legal heir made an application on ]compaasionate app<M&tnaent. for thc petitloncr, the respondent ^my step and passed any order on ttie J2008. It is furfher contended that as per is entiflcd to appointment on petiponer ^ "-"' '< ~":h. i XAC-78 SSfe ^crf '<<l^lo»^,U-rflwid,RrtKiy 'nwnr^'n^? sn^sr <^ ('i^tgds) W^ 200 sn^STtfii R')i<b ?rai3n^?7*tfi<b t=- The piirpose of graat of ' uiuuediate succor and reUef respoadeats, by not taking petitioner, have defeated the Thus, it reqiures ttiat the accordaace with. law Accordiagly, the respon^ the appUcation of Annexurc law, aad pass appropriate two inonths as per the Stat| June, 2003. The petition is disposed No order as to costs. ai^ sfedd expediti.o'jisly i|>/2 onters ;oinpassionate appointment ia to provide (o ttie dependant of ttae deceased. The action on fhe appHcatioa/letter of fhe ^urpose of coiapassionate appoiatmeiit. appKcation/Ietter bc considered in jisly, as earty as possible. Uent autfaorities are directed to consider of the petitioner ia accordance with on its own zaerit wiffain a pcriod of policy No.F-7-4/2002/1-3 dated 10tb ipi<<f«4)-i*fi»t«T^''fs'<l<[uit;i'< ^? Slf^T STT^CT ofwith fhe above directions. -—-^l Judge ^