1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED 23.12.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P(MD)No.15012 of 2011 K.Asokan .. Petitioner Vs 1. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Madurai Division, Madurai. 2. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Dindigul Region, Dindgul. .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order issued by the first respondent, General Manager in Parvai Adchi B 884, dated 28.09.2010 and to quash the same and further to direct the respondents herein to consider the petitioner to the post of Conductor as per the selection held on 08.05.2007 within a reasonable time fixed by this Court. For Petitioner :M/s.E.V.N.Siva For Respondents :Mr.T.R.Janarthanam Addl.Govt.Pleader ORDER The petitioner has come to this Court seeking to challenge the correctness of the order passed by the first respondent in Parvai Adchi B 884, dated 28.09.2010 and to quash the same and further to direct the respondents herein to consider the petitioner to the post of Conductor as per the selection held on 08.05.2007 within a reasonable time fixed by this Court. 2. Mr.T.R.Janarthanam, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. 3. At the very outset, it is made clear that when the petitioner has already come to this Court by filing W.P.No.10122 of 2010 in this Court. By order dated 25.08.2010, this Court has given the following direction: "4. Considering the limited prayer sought for, I am inclined to issue a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner,dated 23.07.2010 and pass an appropriate order,on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order." https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. In view of the order, the respondent has passed the impugned order, dated 28.09.2010, which clearly mentioned that the petitioner has failed to secure 50% of marks in the interview. When the respondent has passed the impugned order holding that the petitioner is not qualified as he failed to secure 50% of marks in the interview, this Court may not be in a position to entertain the prayer sought for by the petitioner. Accordingly, the Writ Petition fails and the same is dismissed. No costs. sd/- Assistant Registrar (Records) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Madurai Division, Madurai. 2. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Dindigul Region, Dindgul. W.P(MD)No.15012 OF 2011 23.12.2011 vsn RJ/3.1.12 2p/3c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/