IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8372 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 07, 2010. Lakhwinder Kaur and another .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Ranjit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners are widows and residents of village Khawaspur, Tehsil Khadoor Sahib, Baba Bakala, District Tarn-Taran. They seek quashing of the selection and appointment of respondent No.6 as Anganwari Worker of the aforesaid village. It is alleged that the petitioners are more meritorious but were not even called for interview by the respondents. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, I am of the considered view that the factual assertions made by the petitioners need not be gone into by this Court at this stage as it will be more appropriate to direct the authorities concerned to call for the records and verify as to whether or not the appointment of respondent No.6 has been made as per C.W.P.No .8372 of 2010 2 the prescribed procedure. Similarly, the Authorities shall be obligated to find out as to whether or not the petitioners had applied for the subject post and were they considered or not. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to call for the records and dispose of the petitioners' claim by passing a speaking order after hearing both the parties. The needful shall be done within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 07, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE