CP t^' l'. THE HOyBLB BSGB COURT OF lA • I ^ff A»»^< 72011 ^.k<'.- ^^v%&" .J3^ey (^ ..--.''l^^-'"''' ;..-^^\- .'¥?>"."^' ..-y ^y>""" ''^y Kam.al Das S/0 Ramdas Mamkpuri Aged about 30 years Occupation Kotwar R/0 VUlage Uparwara TahsQ. Aarcmg Dist (1) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary , Department of Revenue Mantralaya, D.K. S. Bhawan Raipur ( C. G.) {2) Collctor, Raipur Dist-Raipur (C.G.) (3) Sub Divisional (Revenue) Raipur Raipur(C.G.) Dist (4)Chief Executive Officer © ^ New Raipur Developm-ent Authority Telibandha Jedhi Vila Near Natioanl Garage Ring Road Raipur Dist Raipur ( C.G.) (5) Nazul Officer Capital Area Developm.ent Authority Raipur ( Chhattisgarh) WRXT PETmOXl UNXtEXi AKTXCUS 226/227 OF TSB COSSTITUTION 0V HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WMT PETmON (0 No. 3689 of2011 Kamal RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WKTT PETmON UNDER ARTtCLE 226/227 OP IHE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri SatMt K. Aenfliotri, J. Present: Shri Atul Pandw, Advocate forIfae petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Moor&y, Deputy Advoeate General forflie &ate/ respondent No. 1 to 3. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Advocate for the respondent No. 4. ORDERrORAL) (Passsd on 12U> day ofJuly, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel qyearing for the petitioner subnuts that the respondents may be directed to cansider and decide the rqaresentatiou ofthe petitioner for alloitment ofaltematrve land in compliance oflfae direetions ofthe Adarsh RdabiUtation poliey of Ifae CUiattisgarh State, 2007 and Ifaereafter, aequire the land granted to the petitioner, as service land. 2. Shri Pandey fiirther submits thttt in an identical matter i.e. Kotwar Association ofChattisgarh v. State ofChhattisgarh & Others^, this Court has disposed of tiie petition of the Kotwar Associaton by giving the members an opportunity to file individual applications/ representations with a direction to consider and decide the same in accordance with law and in accordance wtth the provisions ofthe Adarsh Rehabilitation policy of the Chhattisgarii State, 2007. Thus, this petition may also be disposed ofin the same terms. W.P.(C)No. 7524/2009, deeided on 12.01.2010 S »' ^ 3. Leamed counsel appearing for other side do not controvert the above submission and suhmit that they have no objection if the petition is disposed of in terms of the arder passed in Kotwar Association ofChhattisgarh (supra) 4. In view of the Aove subnussions made bv leamed counsel appearu^ for fhe parties, tius petition is disposed ofin terms oflhe wdsrpassedmKotwarAssociation ofChhattisgarh (supra) i.e. the petitioner may file a fresh applieation before the appropriate autfaority in accordaace with law for g-ant of patta/allotment of land and ifsuch application is filed, it shaU be disposed ofbythe concemed' authoritv in accordance with the revanie laws and also keeping in miad the provisions oftfae Adarsh Rehabilitation poliey ofthe ChhattisgaA State, 2007. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge