1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2573 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 2573 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 2573 OF 2009 Shri Shivajirao Ganpatrao Kadam ..Petitioner Vs. Shri Prakash Nandlal Lakhani & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Jaydeep S. Deo for the petitioner. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATE: 1st April, 2009. DATE: 1st April, 2009. DATE: 1st April, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. No interference is warranted in exercise of the writ jurisdiction in relation to the discretionary order passed by the Court below. Assuming that there is an error of jurisdiction committed by the trial Court in the impugned order, that can always be corrected in the appeal if the petitioner is required to file appeal against the final decision of the trial Court. All questions in that behalf will have to be considered on its own merits in the said appeal. As observed by the 2 Apex Court in the case of Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai & Ors. reported in (2003) 6 SCC 675, Rai & Ors. reported in (2003) 6 SCC 675, Rai & Ors. reported in (2003) 6 SCC 675, in particular, in Paragraph 39, no interference. The Writ Petition is dismissed. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)