IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 28TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 9TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 20221 of 2004(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- T.V.SUSHEELA, PROPRIETRIX, JWALA AGENCIES, SOUTH BEACHROAD, I.O.C.DEALER, KEROSENE WHOLESALE DEALER, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.T.S.RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI SRI.T.R.RAJEEV RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES & CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, KOZHIKODE. 4. THE CITY RATIONING OFFICER, (SOUTH) KOZHIKODE. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. MR. ARAVINDAKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 20221 of 2004(G APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF LETTER OF GOVT. OF INDIA , MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM & NATURAL GAS TO CHIEF SECRETARY OF ALL STATE GOVERNMENTS/UTS. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF CIRCULAR OF 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 17.08.1996 EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF REVISED PRICE FIXATION STATEMENT ISSUED BY 4TH RESPONDENTDATED 02.05.2003 EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF LETTER OF GOVT. OF INDIA DATED 27.10.2000. EXT.P5 : TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 04.06.2002 OF GOVT. OF INDIA. EXT.P6 : TRUE COPY OF ORDER OF GOVT. OF KERALA DATED 24.07.2000 EXT.P7 : TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN O.P. 38733/02 DATED 03.02.2003, HIGH COURT OF KERALA EXT.P8 : TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN R.P.221/04(E) IN W.P.(C) 4663/04 DATED 26.03.2004, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. EXT.P9 : TRUE COPY OF NOTICE OF 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 06.06.2004. /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 20221 OF 2004 ......................................................................... Dated this the 28th February , 2011 J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly conceded that the issue involved in this petition is squarely covered against the petitioner by the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No. 2886 of 2007 and connected cases . In the said circumstance, the writ petition is dismissed in terms of the verdict passed by the Division Bench as aforesaid. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk