SA No. 66 of 2008 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard Sri B.D. Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the appellants on admission. This Second Appeal, preferred under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is directed against the judgment and decree dated 29.07.2008, passed by Ist appellate court (District Judge, Tehri Garhwal) in Civil Appeal No. 12 of 2005, whereby the judgment and decree dated 08.09.2005, passed by the trial court is upheld. Brief facts of the case are that plaintiffs are the heirs of Prakash Chandra (deceased) who died after getting in contact with a high-tension electricity wire hanging at the height of 2 feet from his house. The plaintiffs instituted Suit No. 6 of 2003 before Civil Judge, Tehri, for compensation on the ground that they have lost bread earner of their family due to negligence on the part of defendant (appellant). The trial court after recording the evidence and hearing the parties decreed the suit for Rs.2,50,000/- as compensation with 6% per annum simple interest thereon. Uttaranchal Power Corporation (defendant / appellant) challenged the said judgment and decree passed by the trial court before the District Judge, Tehri Garhwal, and said appeal has also been dismissed. Hence this second appeal. There are two questions raised in this second appeal, one relating to the contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiffs and second quantum of compensation. Both the points are the questions of fact regarding which there is concurrent finding of the courts below. Having heard learned counsel for the appellants, this Court does not find any substantial question of law on which the second appeal requires to be admitted. Therefore, the second appeal is dismissed summarily. (Stay Application No. 5907 of 2008 also stands dismissed). (P.C.P., J.) 09. 9.2008 0 NS