IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.333 of 2011 KESHAR KHARWAR @ TARKESHWAR KUMAR KHARWAR S/O- BIRENDRA KHARWAR @ BIRENDRA PRASAD, Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. - ---------- 2 15.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is a declared juvenile in conflict with law. He is facing charge punishable under Section 366A. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main allegation is against one Ramesh Pandey. Referring to the statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C., it is submitted that the petitioner is said to have assisted Ramesh Pandey in eloping along with the victim with whom he had love affairs. It is contended that during the relevant time, he was a high school student. It is submitted that petitioner is in custody since 2.7.2010 and there is no criminal antecedent. It is also submitted that he is a neighbour of the victim. In the facts and circumstances of the case, while setting aside the impugned orders, petitioner abovenamed is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Juvenile Justice Board, Kaimur (Bhabua) in connection with Ramgrah P.S. Case No. 76 of 2010 (G.R. No. 958/2010) subject to the 2 following conditions: (i) One of the bailors shall be father of the petitioner. (ii) It will be the duty of the father to monitor the conduct of the petitioner and to produce him before the Court as and when required. In case of default in such appearance, the Court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (iii) During the subsistency of the present privilege of bail, if it is found that the petitioner is found involved in any other criminal case, the same shall be treated as a breach of condition of bail entailing cancellation. pkj (Kishore K. Mandal, J)