IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 28TH AUGUST 2009 / 6TH BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 20234 of 2005(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K. MOHANAN, S/O. KRISHNAN, AGED 53 YEARS, INSPECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KOTTARAKKARA AND RESIDING AT VALLAVILA HOUSE, KUDAVATTOOR P.O., ODANAVATTOM, KOTTARAKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION KOTTARAKKARA. ADV. SHRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN WPC.20234/05 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF DUM NO.PL.10/027430/04 DATED 4.10.04 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO ALL UNIT OFFICERS. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF REVISED DRAFT GRADATION LIST OF CONDUCTORS AS ON 01.04.2001 - PART 1 (SPECIAL GRADE) CONDUCTORS APPOINTED UPTO THE ADVICE LIST NO.PLA.11/82478/83 DATED 6.10.1983. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.D.DIS. 025517/03(APL) DATED 22.9.2003 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF MEMORANDUM NO.PL9-012377/05 DATED 27.4.2005 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 10.5.2005 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. EXT.P6: A TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.PL10/3432/08 DTD.1.4.2008. EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 6.7.2009 IN W.P(C).17726/05. /TRUE COPY/ THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.20234 OF 2005 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of August, 2009 JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of Ext.P7 produced along with I.A.10723/09, the impugned Ext.P4 has to be necessarily go. Having considered Ext.P7, I am satisfied that in the light of that, Ext.P4 requires re- consideration. Accordingly, this writ petition is ordered directing that the Managing Director of KSRTC will take up Ext.P4 and re-consider it in the light of the findings of this Court in Ext.P7. Let this be done within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This writ petition is ordered accordingly, without entering further into the merits of the matter and leaving open all other questions. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.28/8.