IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4976 of 2011 Dilkeshawar Ram, Son of Late Jatan Ram, resident of Village- Bharatpura, P.S. Dulhin Bazar, District-Patna -- Petitioner Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, Patna through its Chairman 2. The Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Baily Road,Patna 3. The Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Baily Road,Patna 4. The Deputy Account Director ( Head Quarter) , Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Baily Road,Patna 5. The Superintendent Engineer, Electric Supply Anchal, Gaya 6. The Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Pramandal, Jehanabad 7. The Assistant Engineer , Electric Supply Awar Pramandal, Arwal 8. The General Provident Fund Officer, District- Jehanabad-cum- Arwal --------------------------- Respondents. ----------- 02 16-03-2011 Heard Sri Arbind Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ajay Kumar Gautam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondents/ Bihar State Electricity Board. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 15.9.2010 as Class IV employee ( Khalasi) from the office of Electric Supply Awar Pramandal, Arwal, District –Arwal , has prayed for directing the Respondents to make payment of all his retiral dues. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not even getting provisional pension. It was further submitted that the petitioner had filed repeated representations, but no decision has been taken till date. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Respondent nos. 3 and 6 i.e. the Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna 2 and the Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Pramandal, Jehanabad respectively within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, both the Respondents are directed to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If the grievances of the petitioner are considered as genuine, the Respondents are directed to take steps for clearing all the admitted dues of the petitioner within the aforesaid time. In case of refusal, Respondents, particularly Respondent nos. 3 and 6 are directed to pass speaking order within the aforesaid time. It is made clear that the petitioner shall be entitled to get statutory interest on the delayed payment of the admitted dues. The petition stands disposed of with above observation and direction. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)