IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2008 / 30TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 19833 of 2008(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SHAMSHEELA , PADINJATTE VEEDU, MAYYANAD, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.SANTHOSH KUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA ,REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KOLLAM. 4. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA NO.I) KOLLAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(c).No. 19833 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 21st day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT I disposed of this case on 14/07/2008 directing the fourth respondent to conduct enquiry under section 5A into Ext.P3 objections filed by the petitioner, hear the petitioner and to take a final decision regarding the recommendations to be made by him about the objections. I had also directed that at any rate the fourth respondent shall comply with the directions in the judgment within one month of receiving copy of this judgment. Thereafter the learned Government Pleader would submit at 4:30 p.m. on the same day that he had received written instructions from the land acquisition officer to the effect that section 5A enquiry had already been completed on 05/01/2008 and that the report incorporating recommendations had also been forwarded to the Land Revenue Commissioner on 18/02/2008. It is on that basis that the case was posted to this date as 'to be spoken to'. 2. Today, I have heard the learned counsel again and having regard to the submissions addressed before me by the learned counsel W.P.C.No. 19833/08 2 for the petitioner Sri.S.Santhosh Kumar and the learned Government Pleader Sri.Basant Balaji today, I am of the view that the writ petition is liable to be disposed of issuing the following directions; In modification of the directions issued under my judgment dated 14/7/2008, the second respondent Land Revenue Commissioner will consider the report forwarded to him by the fourth respondent land acquisition officer regarding his recommendations on Ext.P3 objections filed by the petitioner and take a decision at the earliest and at any rate within three weeks of receiving copy of this judgment. Once the second respondent takes a decision on the recommendations of the fourth respondent, such decision will be communicated to the petitioner. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE sv. W.P.C.No. 19833/08 2