1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi WRIT PETITION NO.607 OF 2009 . Shri Hastimal G. Chandan & Ors. ..Petitioners. vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr. Bhandary, i/b. Bhandary & Bhandary, for Petitioners. Ms. T.H. Puranik, for Respondents. .... CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 3RD AUGUST 2009. P.C. By this writ petition, the petitioners have impugned the orders of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, dated 23 rd March 1999, 26 th March 2002 and 7 th March 2003 fixing rateable value of the petitioner’s property. The remedy to impugn these orders is provided under section 217 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (the said Act). In fact, in respect of all the orders impugned by way of this writ petition, the petitioners have already preferred appeals before the Small Causes Court, Mumbai. 2. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have deposited only a part of the amounts required to be deposited under 2 section 217 (5) of the said Act. The petitioners also preferred a review application/petition before the Small Causes Court seeking exemption from deposit of the entire amount as required under section 217(5) of the said Act, which was rejected on 27 th July 2007. The present writ petition is thereafter filed on 4 th March 2009. 3. I have heard the learned Advocate for the petitioners. Since the said Act provides for an appeal from the orders impugned in this writ petition which were passed in the years 1999, 2002 and 2003 and the appeal provided under the Act is already filed by the petitioners, no interference is called for by this Court in its writ jurisdiction. 4. Writ petition is therefore dismissed with no orders as to costs. [ S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ]