IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP1 No. 6151 & 6152 of 2011. Decided on: 12th August, 2011. CWP No.6151 of 2011: Tej Ram …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. … Respondents. CWP No.6152 of 2011: Durga Dass …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : Mr. C.N. Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim work charge status/regularization with all consequential benefits from the date they completed 10 years of continued service. Reliance is placed on the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 313. 2. The learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioners may file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the 2 second respondent within a period of one month from today. The second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in the light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The petitioner(s) will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment referred to in this judgment while submitting the representation(s). 3. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 12th August, 2011 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tilak) Judge. 3