1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Appln. (caf) No. 1010 of 2011 (In FA No. 1251 of 2010) V.I.D.C. ...Versus... Leelabai w/o Pandurang Sutgat & ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. A.B. Patil Advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.J. Shinde Advocate for Res. no.1. ... CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 19.04.2011. Heard. This is an application by respondent no.1/original claimant in land acquisition reference proceedings seeking permission to withdraw the entire amount deposited by the appellant. It is not in dispute that the total amount deposited by the appellant in this Court is Rs.17,11, 841/-. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that in similar type of cases this Court has reversed the judgment and Award of the Reference Court and reduced the amount of compensation and further that the said judgment has been stayed by the Supreme Court. Counsel for the claimant argued that 2 even in that event the respondent no.1 should be allowed to withdraw at least 50% of the amount deposited in this Court as the respondent no.1 has lost her land in acquisition. Having heard learned counsel for rival parties, at the outset, I find that the application for withdrawal does not contain specific reasons as to why the huge amount of Rs. 17,11,841/- is required to be withdrawn. Secondly, the Apex Court having granted stay to the judgment of this Court, it would be appropriate at this stage not to allow withdrawal of even 50% of the amount deposited by the appellant in this Court. But respondent no.1 cannot be allowed to be without any relief. Hence, the following order. C.A. No. 1010/11 is disposed of permitting respondent no.1/original claimant to withdraw 25% of the amount deposited in this Court upon furnishing security to the satisfaction of Registrar (J) of this Court, for the present. Judge /TA/