IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52263 of 2008 1. SHAMBHU SINGH Son of Ram Chandra Singh 2. Vinod Kumar Son of Shambhu Singh Both resident of village- Naura, P.S.- Meennpur, District- Muzaffarpur -----------------Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------------------Opposite Party ----------- 2. 6.2.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 504, 307, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 1 has his land just near the land of the informant, and there is a land dispute between them and therefore he has been involved in this case, although the S.P. has reported in his supervision note that Shambhu Singh and his son were not present in the place of occurrence. It is further submitted that the petitioner no. 2 is not named in the F.I.R. and his name only transpired subsequently on the statement made by witness under Section 164 Cr.P.C. The submissions of the petitioners may be a good ground for granting regular bail. However, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. P. Kumar (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)