.^w^ £; &sK!:yK S't^ySlL^ ^^^'y'&S^i c^ ^ IN THEHON'BLE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G) W.P.(S)NO. \^V\ OF 2011 PETITIONER e*fesffK \o.•^ RESPONDENTS ^-[x' ^^J^. ^':-.^' y \ ^' \ .^ bW*' : Bhasker Kumar Singh, aged about 40 years, S/o Late Shri Bharat Singh, Shiksha Karmi Grade-111, Middle School Durti, Pratappur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) VERSUS :1. State of Chhattisgarh through The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. The Collector, Sarguja (C.G.) 3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Pratappur, Sarguja (C.G.) 4. The District Education Officer District Sarguja (C.G.) WRITPETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA 1 PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As mentioned in the cause title. 2. PARTiCUI-ARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As mentioned in the cause title. ^•s. ^ i t.^y) i :i. '^siy^./s '^. y A-N> Amit HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAKH AT BILASPUR WKITPETITIONfS') No.l381of2011 PETITIONER : Bhasker Kumar Singh. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri. J. Present: Shri D.N.Prajapati, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govemment Advocate for the State/ respondent No. 1, 2 and 4. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 14th day ofMarch, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in this petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in Prakash Kumar Das v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others . Thus, fhis petition may also be disposed ofin the same terms. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed ofwith liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach the respondent authorities to claim appointment on regular post in accordance with the policy of compassionate appointment. In case such representation is made, the concemed authority shall take decision expeditiously in accordance with law, on its own merits and perspective. ^^.A8a" ' W.P. No* 4203/2010, decided on 05.08.2010