18 g^^^^ ti.gi^^iy1^' a^?- Shiv Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Mannaram Sharma, aged about-50 .<c. -•• i./^' ..••' years, Principal, R/o Sector 2, Ganga °y~^''' .•••"< Nagar, Manlga, Tahsil 85 Distt. Bilaspur ' -~—~0~' ^Y^.^v (C-G-)- ^/W r^ /•.f' .^y 'N' cy ft<?" VERSUS 1 .^ State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. "Assistant Commissioner, School Education Department, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C..G.). District Education Officer, Bilaspur 3. 4. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts, Pension, Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). r^? ^-fi HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P,?Si.Mp.^6847/2Qll versus Shiv Kum.ar Sharma State ofChhattisgarh & Others Shri Saatosh Bharat, coiuisel for the petitioner. Shri N.NaIia Roy, P.L. for the State. WRIT P^STITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OP THiE CQKSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (21.11.2011) Cotuisel for fhe petitioner subxnits that the petitioner is entitled to benefit of two advance iticrements on accouat of he haviag passed B.Ed. examination before his appoiataient at his own cost. It is submitted fhat the issue involved ia fhe present petition is no longer res integra aad the same has been finaUy decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in. the case ofAsha Saxeaa Vs. State of M.P. & Ors. 2009 (iii)aapjR (sc) 59. It is further subinitted fhat fhis Court has also taken a sinular view in its or&ei dated 6.2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008. Counsel for the petitioaers farther subniits that fhe order dated 29.4.2010 passed m Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, wherein relyinj upon the judginent of the Supreme Court in the case ofAsha Saxena (supra) aad the order passed by fhis Court ia another Writ Appeal No. 87/2009, directions bave bcen issued for consideration of the .case for graat of two advauce increnients as per circular dated 21.9.1974 issued by the State ofMadhya Pradesh, after verification of fhe facts pleaded in the petition. Counsel for fhe Stete submits that case of the petitioner would also be considered on ftie same lines. In view of above, fhe petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to decide the clann of the petitioner for graat of two advance increinents as per circular dated 21.9.1974 issued by fhe State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of fhe facts pleaded ia fhe petition wifhia a period offour inonfhs froui today. It is m.ade clear fhat this Court has not expressed any opinion on nierits of the case and fhe authority conceraed would be at Hberty to decide the saine strictly in. accordance wifh law. ^_^——~~~~~~' Sd/- |n«»NN^»