HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA CRL.P.No.4319 of 2008 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is directed against the order of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Nalgonda at Suryapet dated 25.04.2008 dismissing the Crl.R.P.No.14 of 2006 filed by the petitioner herein against the order of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Suryapet, dated 31.12.2005 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2016 of 2005 in C.C.No.761 of 2003. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner herein is the husband of the 2nd respondent herein and on the report of the 2nd respondent, a charge sheet was filed against the petitioner and others under Section 498-A of I.P.C. before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Suryapet, and the same was taken on file as C.C.No.761 of 2003. Subsequently, Crl.M.P.No.2016 of 2005 was filed by both parties under Section 320 (2) Cr.P.C. before the trial Court stating that the matter was compromised and they wanted to live together. Thereafter, the 2nd respondent filed a memo in the aforesaid Crl.M.P.No.2016 of 2005 reporting that compromise was failed and recording the same, the trial Court, dismissed the said Crl.M.P. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner herein filed Crl.R.P.No.14 of 2006 and the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Nalgonda dismissed the said Crl.R.P. on the ground that no notice was served on the 2nd respondent and one M.Ramesh, advocate, representing the learned Counsel for the petitioner made an endorsement that the petition is not pressed. When this petition was listed for the first time on 18.07.2008, the learned Counsel for the petitioner sought for an adjournment for filing an affidavit of said Mr.M.Ramesh, advocate and accordingly the matter was adjourned by one week. Thereafter, for the first time, this matter was listed before me today. Hence, it is clear that the petitioner has not evinced any interest in the matter. Since the calendar case is of the year 2003 and as there was no stay of the proceedings in C.C.No.761 of 2003, in my considered view, the trial in the said case must have been over or it is in progress. In the light of the same, this Court is of the view that this petition cannot be entertained at this length of time. I find no merit in this petition. The Criminal Petition is accordingly dismissed. _______________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 27.04.2010 Gsn.