1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No.644 of 2010 (Laxmikant @ Kanha s/o Suresh Sakhore v. The State of Maharashtra) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri Mahesh Singh, Advocate for Applicant. Shri D.B. Yengal, APP for Respondent. Coram : A.H. Joshi, J. Dated : 6th May, 2010 1. Heard. Perused the chargesheet and accompanying documents. 2. Bail is pressed on the ground that there was no material whatsoever or clue in the hand of police on the day on which the applicant was arrested. 3. This statement is seen to be factually incorrect as two co-accused had disclosed the role and involvement of the applicant. 4. In this background, there is sufficient material against the applicant showing his involvement in the offence. 5. Therefore the applicant has no case for grant of bail. 6. Application is rejected. Judge pdl