IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC(T).: 394 of 2008 Decided on: 19.11.2010. _________________________________________________________ Kamal Dev Sharma. … Petitioner. Versus Ms. Sudarshna Minhas and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. Jagdish Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening events. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 19, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?