HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU CONTEMPT CASE No.581 of 2010 ORDER: This contempt case is filed complaining wilful disobedience on the part of the respondents saying that the unofficial respondents are interfering into the possession of the petitioners’ land. It appears the unofficial respondents filed W.P.No.16474 of 2009 whereunder in W.P.M.P.No.21635 of 2009 an order was passed on 10/08/2009 directing not to evict the petitioners therein. However, on filing a vacate stay petition, by an order dated 16/12/2009 in W.V.M.P.Nos.3158 and 4152 of 2009 in W.P.M.P.No.21635 of 2009 in W.P.No.16474 of 2009 the interim order passed on 10/08/2009 was modified to the effect that “the petitioners shall not be evicted, if not already evicted during the pendency of the writ petition (i.e., the respondents herein)’. Now the complaint of the petitioners is that the respondent/writ petitioners are interfering into this land, and therefore, it amounts to contempt. It is unfortunate that there is no such order. Only the order was in favour of the respondent/writ petitioners which was modified. There is no order passed in favour of the petitioners/respondents herein. The Contempt Case is misconceived and is accordingly closed. __________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 24th August, 2010 SKM