IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 18128 of 2010 Date of Decision: 6.10.2010. Ved Vert --Petitioner Versus Panjab University, Chandigarh & others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. N.K. Nagar, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. Ashish Rawal, Advocate present in the Court has been asked to accept notice on behalf of Mr. Anupam Gupta, Advocate for respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioner was working as a driver. It is alleged that he was given additional duties. Petitioner claims that he is entitled to 10% of additional pay and D.A for performing the additional duties under the rules. Petitioner has made a representation (Annexure P-11) in this respect but no decision has been taken thereon till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the representation made by the petitioner, referred to above. CWP. No. 18128 of 2010 -2- In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority of the university to take decision on the representation made by the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said authority. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. The petitioner is also at liberty to make supplementary representation, if, so desired within a period of two weeks, which shall also be taken into consideration while deciding the controversy. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 6.10.2010. lucky