@2 HIGH COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITIGN (C) NO. 577 OF 2099 Ghasiram, S/o Late Maniyaf. age 60 years; Rio viliage Amgaon. Tahsil Tamnar, Distt. Raigarh (CG). PET!TIONER Versus 1. State of Chhatt§sgarh, through ‘ Secretary, Revenue Department, D.K.S, i Bhawan. Raipur (CG). 2. The Collector, Raigarh. Distt. Raigarh (CG). (Writ petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of indie) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present : Shri Sameer Sahu, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur. Pane! Lawyer for the State. RESPGNDENTS O ORDER (Passed on this 8 day of April, 2009) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the ‘ petition is heard finally. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the . petitioner is in possession of the lands, which were in possession of his predecessors. The possession of the iands in question has been uninterrupted and continuous. The petitioner claims Bhoomiswami rights over the lands, which have been granted by the competent authority to his predecessors prior to 1950.- 3) Learne/rl counsel for the petitioner submits that the facts and question of law involved in this petition as well as the relief sought are similar to that of in W.P.No.341 of 2002 (Fatte Singh and others vs. The state of Chhattisgarh & others), which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 22.“ February, 2007, in the following terms : "in the result, this petition is disposed of with the dire'ction that the competent authority shall consider the case of the petitioners for grant of Bhoori'riswami right, in accordance with iaw aner affording proper opportunity of hearing to the concerned parties, within a petiod of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.“ 4) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that the respondent/State may be directed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment and order passed by this Court in the matter of Fatte Singh and others (supra) to which learned counset appearing for the State has no objectton. 5) tn view of the above. this petition stands disposed with the direction to the respondent/State to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in the tight of the order dated 22-2-2007. passed by this Court in the matter of Fatte Singh (supra). No order asto costs. i sd/- ‘J Satish K. Agnihotri V. H Judge i,