1 wp956.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 956 of 2011 Smt. Babibai Moreshwar Patil & ors. ...Petitioners v/s. Mrs. Gulab Parshuram Patil ...Respondent Mr. S.R. Mishra for the petitioners. Smt. Anjali Helekar and S.A. Abhyankar for the respondent. CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J. DATED :- MARCH 03, 2011. P.C. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 11th October, 2010 vide which the learned trial Court has rejected the preliminary objection of the present petitioner regarding pecuniary jurisdiction of the City Civil Court to entertain the suit. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the value of the suit property is worth more than crores and, therefore, suit was totally undervalued. 2 wp956.11.sxw 3. The learned trial Court has found that suit was partitioned and as per Section 6(vii) of Bombay Court Fees Act, any suit for partition and separate possession of share of the land property or to enforce right to share in any property on the ground that it is joint family property, the Court fees is to be paid according to the value of the share in respect of which the suit is instituted. The value of the suit property as per the said provision has to be determined in accordance with clause 5 of the said section. The learned trial Court has found that the suit was valued for the purpose of jurisdiction at Rs. 9580/- i.e. 200 times of the revenue of the suit property and the plaintiff’s 1/6th undivided share comes at Rs. 1600/-. 4. In that view of the matter, no perversity could be noticed to warrant interference. Rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J)