THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU C.M.A.No.393 of 2003 ORAL JUDGMENT: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act is filed challenging the order and decree made in O.P.No.496 of 1998 dated 19.3.2002 on the file of the learned Principal Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nellore. Appellant is second respondent in the O.P. The first respondent is claimant and second respondent is the owner of the vehicle. It appears, the learned Principal Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nellore has given the findings based on Ex.B1-Insurance Policy, which indicates Registration number of the Vehicle involved in the accident as TDG 1188, which is valid from 27.1.1998 to 29.3.1998 for a short period and the accident, according to the claimant, had occurred on 25.3.1998. Though the policy indicates the registration number as TDG 1188, in the charge sheet and claim petition the vehicle number was mentioned as AP26/U 1666. It appears, the Tribunal below presumed that the accident had occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of vehicle bearing No.TDG 1188, which was renumbered as AP26/U 1666 and thus, fixed liability on the Insurance Company. Now, along with the appeal, C.M.P.No. 13412 of 2004 is filed seeking to receive the documents as additional evidence to show that vehicle No. AP26/U 1666 relates to another vehicle No.TDG 9595 and not vehicle bearing No.TDG 1188. Therefore, it requires to find out as to whether the said vehicle bearing No.TDG 1188 is transferred and renumbered as AP26/U 1666 and whether it is covered by any valid policy. Under those circumstances, the order and decree made in O.P.No.496 of 1998 dated 19.3.2002 is set aside and the matter is remanded back for reconsideration of the Tribunal afresh. Both the parties are at liberty to lead evidence, both oral and documentary, as per law. There shall be no order as to costs. Accordingly, CMA is allowed. No costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 18.3.2010 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU C.M.A.No.393 of 2003 18.3.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU C.M.A.No.393 of 2003 Date: 18th March, 2010 Between: The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., represented by its Manager, Nellore. .. Appellant And Shaik Khuddus Saheb & another. .. Respondents Under those circumstances, the order and decree made in O.P.No.496 of 1998 dated 19.3.2002 is set aside and the matter is remanded back for reconsideration of the Tribunal afresh. Both the parties are at liberty to lead evidence, both oral and documentary, as per law. There shall be no order as to costs. The C.M.A. is accordingly allowed.