WP(C) 697/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BK SHARMA The dispute raised in this writ petition is the residential stat us of the respondent No. 8. The matter pertains to appointment of Anganbadi Help er for the center called No. 165 Dighalzar under Binakandi ICDS Project in the D istrict of Nagaon, Assam. According to the petitioner, the respondent No. 8 bein g not a resident of the area covered by the said Anganbadi Center, she could not have been selected for appointment as Anganbadi Helper. The official respondents, in their counter affidavit have placed reliance on the certificate issued by the Gaonburha certifying that the respond ent No. 8 is an inhabitant of the said area. On the other hand, the respondent N o. 7 i.e. the Gaonburha has filed an affidavit denying issuance of any such cert ificate. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondent No. 8, it has been sta ted that her name was wrongly included in the voter list of another center, but she belongs to aforesaid Anganbadi Center. The aforesaid disputed question of facts, this Court exercising its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, cannot decide. In view of the above and in terms of the judgment and order date d 11.5.2011 passed in a batch of writ petitions, first one being WP(C) No. 215/2 010, this writ petition is disposed of providing that the directions contained i n the said judgment and order shall also govern the case of the petitioner. The petitioner may obtain a certified copy of this order and fur nish the same to the Director of Social Welfare Department along with the copy o f the writ petition and its enclosure for his necessary follow up action. As pro vided in the said judgment and order no adverse order be passed against the resp ondent No. 8 without hearing her. Writ petition is disposed of.