IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.342 of 2009 NAVIN KUMAR MISHRA @ NAVEEN KUMAR MISHRA S/O RAGHUWANSH PD. MISHRA, R/O VILL- CHIPIYA PO- PHOOL, PS- MAUGANJ, DISTT- RIVA, STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AT PRESENT RESIDING IN THE TOWN OF MOTIHARI PS- MOTIHARI MUFASSIL DISTT- EAST CHAMPARAN---------------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECY. DEPTT OF HEALTH (MEDICAL EDUCATION & INDIAN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE) GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIATE, PATNA 2. THE ADDL. SECY. DEPTT OF HEALTH, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIATE, PATNA 3. THE JOINT SECY. DEPTT. OF HEALTH GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE UNDER SECY. DEPTT. OF HEALTH, GOVT. OF BIHAR,PATNA 5. THE DIRECTOR, INDIGENOUS SYSTEM OF MEDICINE GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 6. THE DISTRICT INDIGENOUS MEDICAL OFFICER, EAST CHAMPARAN 7. THE PRINCIPAL R.N. MUKHERJEE, AYURVEDIC MAHA VIDYALAYA MOTIHARI, PS- MOTIHARI MUFASSIL, DISTT- EAST CHAMPARAN 8. B.S.B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR, THOUGH ITS REGISTRAR 9. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, B.S.B.R.A. BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR, DISTT- MUZAFFARPUR 10. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, B.S.N.E.A. BIHAR UNIVERSITY MUZAFFARPUR, DISTT- MUZAFFARPUR 11. THE REGISTRAR, B.S.E.B.R.A. BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR, DISTT- MUZAFFARPUR------OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 4 14.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. There is delay of five months and twenty four days in filing the review application against the order passed in LPA No. 386 of 2009. The reason given by the petitioner for delay do not seem convincing because the matter was being pursued in Court and the order has come to be passed after hearing learned counsel. Knowledge to the counsel is also knowledge to the litigant. Even otherwise this Court allowed the petitioner to address the Court on the merit of the review application. He has not been able to point out any error apparent on the face of the record which requires review i.e. order dated 23.4.2009 passed in - 2 - LPA No. 389 of 2009. In absence of any substantive material in the review application as well keeping in view the decision of the LPA Bench, even otherwise no purpose would be served in condoning the delay. This application is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)