1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4096 OF 2010 (Tushar Dhananjay Mandlekar) -: VERSUS :- (State Information Commissioner Vidarbha Region & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : OCTOBER 5, 2010. Heard Shri Mandlekar (Advocate) in person for petitioner, learned Government Pleader Shri Sambre for the respondents 2 and 3 and Shri A. B. Patil learned counsel for the respondent 1. It is apparent that earlier admittedly authorization to drive as contemplated by Rule 14 of the State Rules was not being issued by police authorities. After the petitioner sought information and came right upto this Court, the practice has been started. It also appears that the information as needed about has been supplied to petitioner belatedly and partially. Shri Mandlekar contends that entire information as sought for has not been supplied. 2 However, I am not inclined to treat this matter as a matter filed in private interest by Shri Mandlekar. If the fresh cause again accrues, petitioner can always approach appropriate forum. Hence with these observations present Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE SVK