. ‘7 Y r ; cw m H/ag APPEAL OF' PRISONER ® : i jaag/ Name ’ H IIHHH IlllllllllHlilIHlllN {EH-1 89 (Jail) C J.P.R-/9‘94 CFOOOGO 94 g ./ Father’s nae m Residence / Unde1 Sectlon 6 byj’ ~ 19 @97‘ 6W? Wm» It is explained to the prisoner that if he states he wishes to be represented by a legal wr~*7“‘:"'~\er the appellate Com: will not proceed with the case for seven days unless the titioner appears earlieg. If the legal practitioner does not appear within seven nay not heard at all if the Prisoner states that he does not wish to be repre- legai practitioner the court may proceed at once With the case and W111 not l to give a hearing to my legal practmoner who should appear /Age 4 5’ (x 5f § Sentenced to f ‘ on ' ,22 I ! I ?£ __ e :L é (9 IQME on which Appeal sent Nb r (i. C\ 7 " é r 4% w] é/s ‘her the prisoner wishes to be represented or not 5A . t‘ g O 8 Name Q! ‘ Q Jail {2 I {Q 330W Dated Q£ Z 1 k99é Forwal ded to the ?L M Mtg Tat M paw to getner Witn a copy of Judgement or order passed 1n the case for favour of transmi- sion to the proper Appellate court. 2 Superlntenden‘t’jfé was? : of Applicatlon for copy of Judgement on which copy/received Date of receipt in Office Date of receipt of record to accompany the Memo ‘of Appeal to the Appellate court No Forwarded to the DatecLN it 5% Eaari @f wrastm Hmdgl i iE§HR , L27 ¥ . .Pg ’ s Xi-Ht‘~75§ 3"?” .{r w) 3m". W 3?? mu "m. zya’mii. ’33 :1? MW (Wit?) mar we? 5-751 23.06.2009 Smt. Meena Shastri, courmel for the appellant. Shri Pankaj S1 nivastava, Panel lawyer for the State. Learned counsel for the appeHaJa submits that the aappellant has expired and therefore the appeal sfands abated; Accordingly, tlic appeal is dismissed as abated. l Sd/e Ckf Prtinker Diwaker Jude mmwwvegw % W man t i - j g