IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31203 of 2011(A) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- P.LEENAKUMARI, JUNIOR INSTRUCTOR, GOVERNMENT I.T.I, ATTINGAL, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.M.VIJAYAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE TRAINING DIRECTOR, INDUSTRIAL TRAINING DEPARTMENT, THYCAUD, TRIVANDRUM - 695 014. 2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRAINING DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM - 695 001. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. LIJU STEPHEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.31203/2011 A APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P-1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 10.8.2006. EXT.P-2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATD 20.10.2009. EXT.P-3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.A2/37360/2008 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 14.10.2010. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J --------------------------------------------- W.P.(c)No. 31203 of 2011 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of November 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner is working as a Senior Instructor under the first respondent. She had joined service as a Junior Instructor and was promoted to the next higher post. The grievance of the petitioner is that she has not been granted the legitimate service benefits that are due to her. Though she has submitted Ext.P1 representation, no orders have been passed thereon till date. According to the petitioner, she was entitled to be promoted much earlier to the date on which she was actually promoted. Therefore, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 representation to the first respondent. However, her representation has not been considered by the first respondent, so far. 2. Since Ext.P2 is pending consideration of the first respondent, it is only appropriate that the grievances of the petitioner are considered by the said authority in the WPC No.31203 of 2011 2 first instance. 3. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 4. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the grievances of the petitioner set out in her representation, evidenced herein by Ext.P2, in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. sd/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE true copy P.S.TO JUDGE css/