HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR CRL.R.C.No. 1266 of 2005 O R D E R: The revision petitioner is the husband. Respondents 1 and 2 are his wife and daughter respectively. The trial court granted monthly maintenance of Rs.1,000/- and Rs.500/- in favour of respondents 1 and 2 respectively payable by the petitioner herein. The petitioner would appear to have laid this revision having been aggrieved by the order of the trial court. 2. On 24.8.2011 there was no representation for the revision petitioner. Hence the case was posted to today ‘for dismissal’. Even today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. The respondents are called absent. It is patent that the revision petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the case. 3. Consequently, the revision is dismissed for non-prosecution. _____________ K.G.SHANKAR, J Dt. 09.09.2011 Mjl/*