1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY : AURANGABAD BENCH FIRST APPEAL NO. 692 OF 2007 WITH The State of Maharashtra - - - Appellant versus Nanuram Motiram Patil, age 50 years, occ. farmer, R/o. Talonde, taluka Chalisgaon,dist. Jalgaon. - - Respondent Shri B. V. Wagh, Addl. Govt. Pleader for appellant. Shri P. B. Patil, Advocate for respondent. FIRST APPEAL NO. 694 OF 2007 WITH The State of Maharashtra - - Appellant versus Chindha Bandu Patil, (deceased) through L.R.s 1-A) Arvind Chindha Patil, age 56 years, occ. service, 1-B) Subhash Chindha Patil, age 53 years, occ. service, 1-C) Nanasaheb Chindha Patil, age 43 years, occ. agril., 2 Respondents Nos.1-A to 1-C R/o. Talonde (P.D.) Ral. Chalisgaon district Jalgaon. 1-D) Vatchhalabai Gulabrao Patil, age 60 years, occ. household, R/o. Jaihind Colony, Dhule. 1-E) Bebabai Ramrao Patil, age 49 years, occ. household, R/o. Vadji, taluka Bhadgaon, District Jalgaon. 1-F) Alkabai Devidas Patil, age 48 years, occ. household, R/o. Vinchur, taluka and dist.Dhule. 1-G) Manisha Deepak Suryawanshi, age 41 years, occ. household, R/o. Amode tal. & dist. Jalgaon. 1-H) Shobabai Bhimrao Patil, age 38 years, occ. household, R/o. Picharde, tal. Bhadgaon, District Jalgaon. Shri B. V. Wagh, Addl. Govt. Pleader for appellant. Shri P. B. Patil, Advocate for respondents Nos.1A to 1H. FIRST APPEAL NO. 696 OF 2007 The State of Maharashtra. - - Appellant versus Nana Kautik Patil, age 35 years, occ. farmer, R/o. Talonde, taluka Chalisgaon, dist. Jalgaon. - - Respondent 3 Shri B. V. Wagh, Addl. Govt. Pleader for appellant. Shri P. B. Patil, Advocate for respondent. CORAM: N. D. DESHPANDE, J. Reserved for orders on : 9th November 2009 Pronounced on : 16th November 2009 PER COURT: 1. Heard Shri B. V. Wagh, learned Addl. Govt. Pleader for the appellant State and Shri P. B. Patil, learned Counsel for the respondents in all the appeals. 2. The appellant State preferred these appeals against the same Award passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalgaon on 20-3-1992 in Land Acquisition References under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. These appeals have been admitted after condonation of delay, heard finally and are being disposed of by this common order. 3. On behalf of the respondents it was urged that the present appeals have no merits and those should be disposed of in the light of judgment dated 25-2-2009 passed by the learned Single Judge 4 of this Court in common. The respondents relied on the aforesaid judgment passed in First Appeals Nos. 512/1993, 520/1993 523/1993, 517/1993 and 509/1993. Learned Addl. Govt. Pleader for the appellant State conceded that these appeals have been dismissed by this Court referring to the same Notification dated 15-9-1983 under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act and the impugned award passed is also under the same notification. 4. After hearing both the sides and upon consideration of the judgment of this Court dated 25-2-2009, these three appeals stand dismissed with no order as to costs. The appeals are accordingly disposed of. ( N.D.DESHPANDE, J. ) pnk/sa69207