1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.08.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.JYOTHIMANI and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.A.(MD)No.727 of 2011 S.Gomathinayagam ... Appellant Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Deputy Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 3.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai 600 029. ... Respondents Prayer: The Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order of this Court dated 05.04.2011 made in W.P.(MD)No.433 of 2011 to issue a writ of certiorarified Mandamus to call for records relating to the proceedings of the second respondent in Letter No.20179/H1/99-4 C.T.Department dated 23/2/2000 and the consequential proceedings of the third respondent made in NO.44751/A1/2007 dated 29/4/2009 and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to give accelerated promotion to the petitioner in terms of G.O.Ms.No.175 personnel and Administrative Reform(s) Department dated 10/7/1998. For Appellant : Mr.M.Suresh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.K.Mahendran,Spl.G.P. JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by P.JYOTHIMANI) The Writ Appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 05.04.2011 passed in W.P.(MD)No.433 of 2011 dismissing the Writ petition by upholding the impugned order. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2.The writ petitioner, who is working as Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Tirunelveli, claiming himself that he exercised gallantry act in risking his life during the time when there was a trouble, which shoot out in Melapalayam, Tirunelveli District consequent to the demolition of Baber Masjeth on 06.12.1992 made a request for accelerator promotion by placing reliance upon a subsequent G.O.Ms.No.175 Personnel Administrative Reforms dated 10.07.1998 and that came to be rejected. 3. In our view, the learned Single Judge has correctly held that the benefit of the said G.O. cannot be claimed by the Writ petitioner in respect of an act stated to have been done by him much earlier in Melapalayam on 06.12.1992. We see no reason to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge. Hence, the Writ appeal fails and the same is dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Deputy Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 3.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai 600 029. +One cc to Special Government Pleader, Sr.No.26779 +1cc to Mr.M.Suresh Kumar, Advocate, Sr.No.26699 W.A.(MD)No.727 of 2011 08.08.2011 nbj SMA/22.8.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/