R.S.A No. 1634 of 2007 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A No. 1634 of 2007 Date of decision : August 10, 2009 Hanuman Singh, ...... Appellant (s) v. Amar Singh and others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Sunil Panwar, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3, 5 and 7. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This appeal has been filed against judgment of the lower appellate Court reversing that of the trial Court and thereby dismissing the suit of the plaintiff/daughter (since deceased now represented through L.Rs) challenging the decree suffered by her mother in favour of the respondents. A perusal of the record reveals that one essential factor regarding ownership of the property in dispute viz. the nature of the property owned by the said mother was neither pleaded nor proved. In vague terms, it was mentioned by the plaintiff that the property was ancestral in the hands of her father, and in equally vague terms, it was R.S.A No. 1634 of 2007 ::2:: pleaded by the respondents that since the plaintiff had got married and had, thus, severed her ties from the joint family, her mother had become full owner. In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to dismiss the suit with liberty to the appellant to file a fresh one on the same cause of action leaving it open to him to raise all the points available to him. Ordered accordingly. This appeal stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) August 10, 2009. JUDGE `kk' R.S.A No. 1634 of 2007 ::3::