IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 5TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 14TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 24587 of 2008(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- C,V. SURESHAN, VATHUSSERIL HOUSE, MOOTHEDATHUKAVU , T.V. PURAM, VAIKOM. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRASPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.V.MANOJ KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.24587/08 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN MVAA NO.291/07 DT 18.6.2007. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT DT.28.07.2008 //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 24587 OF 2008 B ==================== Dated this the 5th day of September, 2008 J U D G M E N T Delay in implementation of Ext.P1 judgment in MVAA No.291/07 is what is complained of by the petitioner. By Ext.P1, the appeal was allowed by the Tribunal and permit was ordered to be granted subject to settlement of timing. 2. Learned Government pleader informs that it is in view of a proposal to challenge Ext.P1, that the implementation is deferred. It may be true that there is a proposal to challenge Ext.P1, but the fact remains that as on date, there is no such challenge. If that be so, respondents are bound to implement Ext.P1. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that permit shall be granted. However, any such grant will be subject to any modification which Ext.P1 may undergo in any challenge that will arise. The grant shall be made, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of receipt of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp