;-..;:^% fi.& ' ^ ^a-i 'fe y -; «s»,» -HC—78 ^wl^ o1' sn^tv R-ii* 'Bqi3II?..IWlN; '^:•> 0 «tl*1^1 flWIcd 'SST «4|4|ic.i<i, 0Til<i'ie, fs<diy^< . ftj y3 c tT-7/vc ••^010 W[^200'& 3II^?ITI^? ('j?!^'^!) ^iiwgfta aii^i PETITIONER Dan.shw|ar Prasad Desiiiukh, S/o Dukhi Ram. Desiuul^h, aged about 42 years, R/o Qtr. No.NCStl76, Nehru Colony, Bailadila, District Dantew^ida (CG) RESPONDENTS 1. The Dirt Corporat}ou 2. General Corporatjon Daatewafla 3. Persorm^. Developii^eiit BaUadilaj Writ Petition under Articlb S.B Hon'ble Shii Dhirendra IIIishra, J OS.01.2009: Mr, Goutam. Khctrapal, c.\ Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, A4 Koshy, leacaed counsel for fhe The petitioner is a driv^ before respondent No.2 for in his service book as his been acceded to on fhe pretext) subsistence ofhis first fflamas Leamed counsel for fU pressing fhis petition at this petition Diay be disposed ofwf <M<<If^ll *1)*icff if Fs<<i1 ^t^K ^sifirt 3(i^i ersus ictor, National Miaeral Developinent Limited, Haiderabad. ^aaager, National Miaeral Development [on Limited, Kiraadul, Bailadila, .(CG) Manager, Natioual Miaeral Corporation Liiaited, Kiraiidul, Daatewada(CG) 226 ofthe Coastitution ofladia entdria! depjendants. ^unsel for the petitioner. vocate appears on behalf of Mr. PS 'espondeuts. r under respondent No.2. He appUed riag ttie nam.es of his son aad daughter i. However, his request has not that the cluldren were bom duriag the fhrough his earUer wife. petitioner subniits fhat he—isnot Stage, however, he submits fhat fhis .th liberty to fhe petitioner to filc fresh .^»>^ -^. .'-1 \. s' %iS-i: fc 13 "•:;sia#, '-s ^.^y-78 311^1 qn %")i°ti ?WF 3n^T/sb4 A WWII (h*ll<»> '3^ '^Wl'v\<i, ©TllwiS,[®l<?ll'My,< _^.Zc^..2....3.<3..(/.?... "^_200 -3 3tI^I'IR^ (liclfj°l<?) ?«ii«^^ifsd ^ii^i i^presentation before respoad^i who, iu tuin, niay be furfhe])' within a speci&ed period. Mr. Vindd Deshinukh;| respondents subiaits that representatioa for redressal of: same shall be considered aad period of six weeks froia the d^ order. In view of the above si parties, the itistant petition is to Biake a fresh representation) his grievauces raised in fhis niade, respondent No.2 shal|l accordance with law wifhin a| i^ceipt/production ofcopy of .^nt No.2 for redressal of his grievance, ^ directed to decide his representation leamed counsel appearmg for the |ia case fhe petitioner ffles fresh ^iis grievauces raised ia ttus petition, the decided by respondent No.2 wifhia a ite of receipt/production of copy of fliis •tiifici'il't inii?if ^f 1s%> <[^it$i< iraifinail^r tbnussions of learaed counsel for the jtisposed ofwith liberty to the petition.er |before respondent No.2 for redressal of j>etttion. On such representation beiag cousider and decide the same ia period of six weeks 'froin fhe date of order. Sd/--.", . Dhu'endra?]VHshra Judge ; rn^^ A—-^-.—;ll_r fUis h1-——)