-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY AND AND AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTESTATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS MISCELLANEOUS MISCELLANEOUS PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.33 OF 2001 NO.33 OF 2001 NO.33 OF 2001 IN IN IN PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.200 OF 1998 NO.200 OF 1998 NO.200 OF 1998 Bharat Subhash Gajria through his next of friend Purshottam C. Mehta ...Petitioner v/s Kavita L. Bhatia and ors. ...Respondents Mr Rajesh C. Shah for Petitioner. Mr P.N. Mody i/b M/s Narayanan and Narayanan for Respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 23RD JUNE 2006. -2- P.C. :- 1. Upon perusal of the petition, it is clear that the deceased who was grand father of the petitioner had died leaving behind heirs belonging to class I category and therefore, even if there was no will left behind by him, the petitioner will have no interest in the property left behind by the deceased. Therefore, this petition is not maintainable. petition is disposed off. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. -------------