IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14023 of 2011 SANJAY SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 11.5.2011 Heard. Considering the allegation and the evidence on identification of the petitioner and the deceased, this court is not inclined to direct release of the petitioner. The prayer on behalf of the petitioner for bail is rejected. However, it appears from the rejection order itself that only witness left to be examined in the trial is I.O. of the case and the court below has taken some steps for production of that witness but he is not being produced. The learned trial judge has mentioned that he has also approached the Monitoring Cell of this Court in respect of Fast Track Courts and still the examination of the I.O. could not be done on 25.3.2011. Let the trial court be directed to conclude the trial by delivering judgment in three months time. The Joint Registrar, Monitoring Cell, Fast Track Courts, shall take up the matter with all concerned for production of I.O. of Dinara P.S. Case no. 64 of 2008 giving rise to S.T. No. 30 of 2009 without further loss of time. If the I.O. is not produced, the court below shall close the evidence of prosecution and proceed to dispose of the case by delivering judgment within time frame set down by 2 this Court. The time frame of three months will be counted from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)