1 BA 270-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.270 OF 2011 Saddam Hussain Shaikh ..Applicant alias SK. Abbasuddin V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.Aniket Vagal, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.Geeta P. Mulekar, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 25TH MARCH, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. The applicant had participated in dacoity. He was armed with a knife and was alleged to have assaulted one Kalamdin. After the charge sheet was filed, a Test Identification Parade was held at which the applicant was identified by the witnesses. The defects in the Test Identification Parade 2 BA 270-2011 which the learned Counsel for the applicant seeks to point out would have to be examined by the Trial Judge at the trial. The learned APP states that the trial is to commence on 30th March, 2011. The investigating officer states that he would try to keep all the witnesses present on the date on which the matter is fixed. In view of this, no question of grant of bail arises. 3. Criminal Bail Application is rejected. The learned Trial Judge would bear in mind that once a trial commences, it has to be conducted on day to day basis. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)