Writ Petition No. 4416 (SS) of 2001 Hon'ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. C.M. Application No. 9009 of 2005 Heard Sri T.A. Khan learned counsel for the petitioners and learned standing counsel. Learned standing counsel has filed an affidavit along with present application. In para 2 of this affidavit it is submitted by the respondents that the services of the petitioners have been regularized vide order dated 13.11.2003. Petitioners have filed the present writ petition for regularization of his services. Since the sole grievance of the petitioners is for regularization has been redressed by the respondents, the writ petition has become infructuous. Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) 26.10.2005 S.K.S. Court No.1 Civil Writ Petition No.4416 (S/S) of 2001. Bahadur Singh …………. Petitioner. Versus Kumaun Jal Sansthan & Ors. ……….. Respondents. ----------------------- Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioners have prayed to issue writ of mandamus to command the respondents to pay them salary at the rate of pay scale admissible to the similarly situated regularly appointed employees, until further orders of the High Court, otherwise the petitioners shall suffer irreparable loss. The petitioners are daily wagers and they claimed equal pay for equal work to that of regularly appointed candidates. Since the petitioners have not been regularly appointed, therefore, the petitioners can not claim similar pay scale as admissible to regularly appointed candidates. However, the representations of the petitioners may be considered sympathetically by the respondents and it shall be disposed of within a period of one month from the dated of production of certified copy of this order. The petition is disposed of accordingly. (P.C. Verma, J.) 19.9.2001 P.Singh