IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15104 of 2011 Ravi Kumar, S/O-Raju Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03 17.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 13.09.2010 in a case registered under Sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Admittedly, the victim has already returned to her home and her statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has been recorded. The victim has stated that she was taken away by the petitioner and his associates and subsequently, petitioner established physical relationship with her. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner and victim were in love and, as a matter of fact, at the instigation of the victim, the petitioner solemnized his marriage with victim in a temple and subsequently, he dropped the victim at her home but due to pressure of her parents victim took U-turn and stated a concocted story in her statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Digha P.S. Case No. 180 of 2009. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)