IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.28931 of 2008 Between: Thati Janardhan Rao S/o.late Venkanna R/o. 19-11-227, Shambhunipet, Warangal. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Kakatiya Urban Development Authority, Warangal, rep. by its Vice Chairman. 2 The Warangal Municipal Corporation, Warangal, rep. by its Commissioner. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the arbitrary action of the respondent authorities in trying to demolish and dispossess the petitioner herein from the house property bearing No. 19-11-227, Shambhunipet, Warangal, without giving any notice or proceedings is illegal, void and opposed to Articles 14, 19 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents not to demolish the petitioner's house property without due process of law and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.G.VISHWESHWAR REDDY The Court made the following Order: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.28931 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner approached this Court with the following prayer: “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the arbitrary action of the respondent authorities in trying to demolish and dispossess the petitioner herein from the house property bearing No. 19-11- 227, Shambhunipet, Warangal, without giving any notice or proceedings is illegal, void and opposed to Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents not to demolish the petitioner's house property without due process of law and pass such other order or orders.” When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned standing counsel for Warrangal Municipality submitted that they are not trying to evict the petitioner and if at all his eviction is required they will follow due process under law. In the light of the said submission the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents not to evict the petitioner without following due process of law. No costs. ____________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 30th December, 2008 Note: Issue wire at party’s costs. (B/o) GHN To 1 The Kakatiya Urban Development Authority, Warangal, rep. by its Vice Chairman. 2 The Warangal Municipal Corporation, Warangal, rep. by its Commissioner. 3 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KURR}