..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1590 OF 2007 Dnyaneshwar Narayan Patil. ..Petitioner. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .. Mrs.Sudaxina Gokhale, Adv. for the Petitioner. Mr.A.R.Patil, APP, for the State. .. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : DECEMBER 04, 2007. DATED : DECEMBER 04, 2007. DATED : DECEMBER 04, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner-husband has challenged the judgment and order dated 18.10.2006 passed by the learned JMFC, Panvel in Enquiry Application No.8 of 2004. By the said judgment order, the maintenance of Rs.1000/- was granted. 3. It is seen that the petitioner has an alternate efficacious remedy available of preferring appropriate proceedings before the Sessions Court. Hence, I am not inclined to ..(2).. entertain the present Petition. It is made clear that it would be open to the petitioner to take such appropriate steps as are available in law to challenge the order of the learned Magistrate granting maintenance. 4. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)