IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.889 of 2008(O&M) Date of Decision 04.12.2009 Sushila Devi and others ...... Petitioners VERSUS Bhan Singh @ Bhana and others ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Chaman Lal, Advocate, for Mr.K.S.Chahal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Rajwinder Kaur, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr.Tejinder Joshi, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL): Aggrieved against the order dated 14.06.2007, passed by District Judge, Sangrur, accepting the objection petition of respondent No.4 Lalpati, the petitioner has preferred this petition. I have gone through the impugned order. The vehicle involved in the accident was not owned by the respondents and ownership vested in the company. As per endorsement on the registration certificate, the vehicle in question was with Jit Singh under the higher purchase agreement. As such, the ownership remained with the objector-company. Thus, the Tribunal rightly accepted the aforesaid petition. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 04.12.2009 mamta-II