IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 12TH JULY 2010 / 21ST ASHADHA 1932 CRP.No. 225 of 2010() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20/06/2009 IN IA.754/2009 IN OS.146/2009 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,THIRUVANATHAPURAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS/PLAINTIFFS ------------------------------------------ 1. LAL PRASAD,S/O.GOPI,RESIDING AT KEIZHAKKEVILA VEEDU,CHEMPZAHANTHI,PANGAPPARA VILLAGE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. GOPI,S/O.MADHAVAN,RESIDING AT DO.DO. BY ADV. SRI.H.SIVARAM SRI.MATHEW CHERIAN RESPONDENT(S): COUNTER-PETITIONERS/DEFENDANTS --------------------------------------------- 1. SREEKUMAR.B.S,S/O.BAHULEYAN,RESIDING AT SREE BHADRA,OORUPOIKA,EDAKYODE VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SOUMYA.S.S,S/O.SREEKUMAR,RESIDING AT DO. DO. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- C.R.P.No.225 of 2010 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of July, 2010. ORDER Heard counsel for petitioner. 2. Order under challenge is refusal to order attachment of the property before judgment. As per proviso to Section 115(1) and explanation to the said provision of the Code of Civil Procedure, an order passed in the course of a suit is revisable only if the order if passed in favour of the person applying for revision would have finally disposed of the suit. Even if revision is allowed and I.A.No754 of 2009 is allowed in favour of petitioner, that would not finally dispose of the suit. Hence the order under challenge is not revisable. Accordingly without prejudice to the right of petitioner to challenge the impugned order otherwise as provided under law, this revision petition is closed. Registry shall return the documents to counsel for petitioner on application. THOMAS P.JOSEPH, Judge. cks