IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.34709 OF 2009 1. DILIP PARIHAR, SON OF LATE KHOKHAN PARIHAR 2. JITO PARIHAR, SON OF LATE KHOKHAN PARIHAR 3. MOST. SOGNI, WIFE OF LATE KHOKHAN PARIHAR 4. NEELAM DEVI, WIFE OF DILIP PARIHAR ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DILARPUR, OLD SAIGED TOLA, POLICE STATION MANIHARI, DISTRICT KATIHAR ………………………………………………………………………….PETITIOENRS VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ********** 2 16/11/2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case under Sections 323 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner no. 2 is the brother-in-law, petitioner no. 3 is the mother-in-law, and petitioner no. 4 is the second wife of petitioner no. 1, husband of the complainant. As per the complaint petition, the allegations are omnibus in nature and as such, the petitioners 2, 3 and 4 are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from today in C.A. No. 628 of 2007 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri S.M.F. Bari, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, subject to the conditions laid down 2 under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The application for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner no. 1 is dismissed. Learned Counsel submits that the complainant had already performed another marriage with one Roop Narayan Mandal. All these aspects would considered by the court below at the time of hearing the regular bail application on behalf of petitioner no. 1. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)