IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 26TH KARTHIKA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3918 of 2011 ------------------------- CC.159/2011 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, VAIKOM .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------ 1. SATHEESH KUMAR,AGED 37, S/O.SUBRAMANIA CHARI,KARIMATT HOUSE, V.K.C. P.O,THEVAKKAL,KOCHI-21 2. ANIL KUMAR,AGED 40 YRS, S/O.SUBRAMANIA ACHARI,KARIMATT HOUSE, CHUTTUPADUKARA, EDAPPALLY P.O., KOCHI -24 3. VINOD KUMAR,AGED 32 YRS, S/O.SUBRAMANIA ACHARI,KARIMATT HOUSE, V.K.C. P.O,THEVAKKAL,KOCHI-21 4. SREEDEVI ANILKUMAR,AGED 32, W/O.ANILKUMAR, KARIMATT HOUSE, CHUTTUPADUKARA,EDAPPALLY P.O, KOCHI-24 BY ADV. SRI.K.V.SABU RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 2. DHANYA,AGED 30 YEARS, W/O.SATHEESHKUMAR, PAZHAYA KARIYIL HOUSE, VADAKKEMURI VILLAGE,VAIKAPRAYAR, VAIKOM,ERNAKULAM. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI. RAJESH VIJAYAN R2 ADV. SRI.K.NIRMALAN ---2-- THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: MM Crl.MC.No. 3918 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A1 COPY OF THE FIR DATED 03-01-2011 ANNEXURE A2 A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE CHARGE DATED 07-04-2011 ANNEXURE A3 A COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT PREPARED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE MM N.K. BALAKRISHNAN,J. ------------------------------------ Crl.M.C.No. 3918 of 2011 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 17th day of November, 2011 ORDER Petitioners are accused in CC.10/11 of Vaikom Police station. The offence alleged against them are under Sections 498A, 447, 294(b), 323 and 506(i) r/w 34 IPC. The second respondent is the de facto complainant. She is represented in this court by her counsel. It is submitted by both sides that the matter has been settled out of court. Affidavit of the second respondent has been filed to that effect. The dispute is purely personal in nature. In the light of the settlement arrived at, this petition is allowed. Further proceedings in CC. 10/11 of Vaikom Police station is quashed. N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. smvd