['9 / IN THE HIGH wURT OF JUDICATURE CPEJATTISGARH AT BKLASWR w.P No g§l]2,gaco3 , roosha ttam Dubey’. S/o Shri P.S Dnhey Aged about 49 years, Assistant Proj ect Officer, Mungeli, Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisggrh PETITIONER: Versus “yak ¢& a£A¢£égw4 #rauya The Principal Secretary Department of Agricultur Raipur, chhattisg’ath Shri B.K.S Ray, Agriculture Department, Raipur Chhattisgarh. The Sub Divisional Officer, Agriculture Department. Mungeli Dis-ht. B ilaspur, Chha ttisgarh Shri Gaye Ram Lateyare. S.D.o (Agriculture) Mungeli his tt. B ila spur, chha tt isga rh The Director Department of V Agriculture ‘, Labhandi Farm. Ra imr( Chha ttisga rh) ES?GNDENTS 3 / The Then Principal Secretary, Dy. Director, Agriculture, Depart- ment, Composite Building; B ilaspur, Chha ttisgarh/ f go‘ y“ PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/2270 OF THE CQNgE‘ITUTION 6F INDR w , e R XLHC-78 WWWW Q Ho Q\:L)03 WW Ky‘A. % m 2w Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocane for the petitioner. Shri Rajesh Pandey, Govt. Advocate for the State. Shri Pandcy submits that the officer—in—charge is present. 1t is stated that the: petitioner has not given complete address. Htgxwlvw (’Giwt Pa Heard. fmtitioncr submitted that ho has Counsel for the submitted a representation vide Almexure P- 10, which has not vet been decided. the facts and circumstances of the Having considered case and material on re 0rd, in the opinion of this Court, ends of justice will be s rved if a direction is given to the petitioner to make a de competent authority a1 \\d§sires Within 15 days froin today, and on such representation ’\\m& Qty MAL} e‘ic- W My ed representation afresh before the g with the documents which he a \i mmwifgaw) WWW ammm mmm \ mmwawm $Wm 02-07-2003 w wvp. Na. qyL/og WW W 200 >mw (W) is