IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1596 of 2011 SUSHILA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 24.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks her bail in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 114 of 2008 registered under Sections 447, 307, 324, 325, 326, 323, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It would appear from the Fardbeyan of the informant that on account of land dispute, a quarrel took place between the parties and in that quarrel other accused brutally assaulted the informant with different weapons. So far as petitioner is concerned, allegedly, co-accused Raj Kumari Devi handed over acid to the petitioner and after that petitioner threw acid on the informant as a result of which informant sustained severe injuries on his face and other parts of the body. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner, being lady, is languishing in jail custody since 23.06.2010 and, as a matter of fact, the petitioner has also field a complaint case i.e. Complaint Case No. 2034 of 2008 against the informant of this case. He further submits that even if the prosecution story assumes to be true, then also, the alleged occurrence took place in the spur of moment. Although, informant has received grievous injury on his person but considering the period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody as well as this aspect of the matter that the alleged occurrence took place on account of land dispute, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, District-East Champaran in connection with above stated Paharpur P.S. Case No. 114 of 2008. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)