IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.4991 of 1999 Between: 1 Smt. Vedutla Kamala Bai, W/o.Late V.Pandu Ranga Rao, R/o.12-1-334, Lalapet, North Lallaguda, Secunderabad. 2 Dr. Smt.Vedutla Rama Devi, W/o.Late V.Pandu Ranga Rao, R/o.12-1-334, Lalapet, North Lallaguda, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Revenue Secretary, A.P.Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 W.S.Hanumantha Rao, S/o.Late Seshaiah, 3-2-846, Kachiguda, Hyderabad. 3 W.S.Seshagiri Rao, S/o.Late Seshaiah, 3-2-846, Kachiguda, Hyderabad. 4 W.Sharada Babu Rao, W/o.Late V.S.Venkat Swamy, 3-2-846, Kachiguda, Hyderabad. 5 W.V.Seshadri, S/o.Late V.S.Venkat Swamy, 3-2-846, Kachiguda, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution to quash the orders passed by the Special Court under A.P.Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad in L.G.C.No.265/95 on 12th February 1999 holding it as illegal, unjust and against the principles of natural justice hence not binding on the Petitioners and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.VINOD KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.4991 of 1999 ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) When the matter has been taken up for hearing on 06-02-2009, none appeared for the petitioners and as such, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption “for dismissal” by printing the name of the petitioners. Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, neither learned counsel for the petitioners is present nor is there any representation on their behalf in spite of printing the name of the petitioners. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. The interim order granted on 12-03-1999 stands vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J ________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J Dated: 09-02-2009 Prv ...... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TML}