(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 211 OF 1990 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 211 OF 1990 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 211 OF 1990 The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay ...Petitioner Versus Shri. Champahi Devsi & Ors. ...Respondents ..... Mr. U.J. Makhija i/b M/s. Mulla & Mulla & CBC, counsel for Petitioner ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 23RD FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 23RD FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 23RD FEBRUARY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Mr. Makhija, the learned counsel for the petitioner Board states that during the pendency of this contempt petition, the Board has been put in possession of the subject property on account of the orders passed by the execution Court. 2. In view of these changed circumstances, nothing further survives in this contempt petition and the same is hereby disposed of as infructuous. Rule discharged.