IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2082 of 2011 MD.ASHFAQUE SHAHANWAZ son of Late Md. Hanif, resident of Village – Banki, Post Office – Bahdura, District Purnia ....Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Patna 2. The Member, District Teacher Employment Appellate Tribunal, Purnia 3. The District Magistrate, Purnia 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Purnia 5. The Block Development Officer, Rupauli, Purnia 6. The Block Education Extension Officer, Rupauli, District Purnia 7. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Bhikhana, PS and Anchal Rupauli, District Purnia 8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Bhikhana, PS and Anchal Rupauli, District Purnia 9. Sudhendra Kumar son of Jageshwar Prasaad Singh, resident of Village Bhikhana, Police Station Rupauli, District Purnia 10. Sanjeev Kumar Anand son of Kamleshwar Prasaad Mandal, resident of Village Pokharia, PS Rupaul, District Purnia ............ Respondents ----------- 02- 3/2/2011 Heard Mr. Nagendra Prasad Yadav for the petitioner, and learned Assistant Counsel to AAG III. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 13.12.2010 (Annexure 1), passed by the learned Education Appellate Tribunal in Case no.28/09, preferred by the petitioner, has been rejected. 2. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. It appears that Gram Panchyat Raj Bhikhana, Anchal Rupauli, District Purnia, had conducted a selection 2 process for appointment to the post of Shiksha Mitra. The petitioner was figured in the select list but was not appointed because of his refusal to supply the requisite certificates. Consequently, appointment letter was not issued to him, and other persons in the select list were appointed. It appears that the petitioner was not appointed for reasons entirely attributable to him. Secondly, on account of his act of omission, the post has been filled up. It is, therefore, not possible to grant any relief to the petitioner. 3. The writ petition is dismissed. mrl ( S K Katriar )