IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA NO.45 OF 2009 SARWARI BEGHUM, WIFE OF SHEIKH MISTER, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KANDHAWALIYA, POLICE STATION LAURIYA, DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SHEIKH AKHTAR, SON OF SHEIKH AHMAD 3. SHEIKH AFSAR @ SK. BHUTI PRADEEP, SON OF SHEIKH AKHTAR 2 AND 3 ARE THE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE KANDHAWALIYA, POLICE STATION LAURIYA, DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN ……………………………………………………OPPOSITE PARTIES ********** 3 29/04/2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. This application has been filed against the judgment dated 02.03.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. IV, West Champaran at Bettiah by which the Court has acquitted the Opposite Parties under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code and giving them the benefit of Probation of Offenders Act. The Trial Court has convicted the Opposite Parties under Section 452 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code. By the order of the appellate Court, the Opposite Parties were to furnish probation bonds of Rs. 5,000/- each and to maintain peace and if there is any violation of the said conditions, coercive steps would be taken by the Court below against them. Learned Counsel for the petitioner 2 submits that even after this order, the Opposite Parties have violated the terms of the bond for which she has filed a case. It would be proper for the petitioner to bring this fact to the notice of the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. IV, West Champaran at Bettiah so that proper steps may be taken against the Opposite Parties for violating the terms and conditions of the order dated 02.03.2009. As far as this SLA is concerned, I find that there is no perversity in the order of the Appellate Court and as such the SLA is dismissed with the aforesaid observations. Anand (Sheema Ali Khan, J. )