CWP(T) No. 11944 of 2008 15.3.2011 Present: Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents/State. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter in issue is squarely covered by the decision rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in Gauri Dutt and others versus State of H.P., Latest HLJ 2008 (HP) 366. He submits that his client shall be content if a direction is issued to the respondents/State to consider the petitioner’s case in the light of the ratio of laid down in Gauri Dutt (supra). Ordered accordingly. It is clarified that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Respondents are directed to decide the petitioner’s case in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. 2. With the aforesaid observations, petition stands disposed of. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. March 15, 2011 (PK)