: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1861 OF 2006 Shri Anil Bhagwandas Jaisinghani ..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. ..Respondents Mr.P.M.Pradhan i/b Dnyaneshwar Deshmukh for petitoner Mrs.A.S.Pai, APP for State CORAM : J.N.PATEL & SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, JJ DATE : 31ST AUGUST, 2006. P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. The Petitioner seeks direction of this court to the respondents to provide him security as earlier provided, as he is aggrieved by the impugned communication that the committee has examined the threat perception and find that no protection is required to be provided to the petitioner. 3. The main contention of the petitioner is that the committee has taken the decision without giving an opportunity and hearing to the petitioner. The operative part of the order dated 29.8.2006 has been : 2 : communicated to the Petitioner by Sr. Inspector of Police, Ulhasnagar Police Station, in which it has been clearly stated that if the Petitioner feels that he required protection and security he may make his own arrangement. 4. In our view, considering the availability of the Police force, it is not possible for the State to provide security for all persons and any person, who find that he deserves to be protected and is under threat of his life and property can always arrange for private security guards, who are now available. Therefore, we are not inclined to entertain this Petition. The Petition is dismissed. (J.N.Patel, J.) (Smt.Roshan Dalvi, J.)