CRM No. M-19024 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. M-19024 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.7.2009 Ayesha and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, Advocate, for the petitioners. Rajan Gupta, J. The only grievance of the petitioners in this case is that they apprehend danger to their life and liberty at the hands of respondents No.5 to 7. According to the counsel, both the petitioners are well educated and have married according to their own free will. Petitioner No.1 is stated to be a dental doctor and petitioner No.2 is an executive in a multinational company. Learned counsel submits that petitioner No.1 converted to Hindu religion and married petitioner No.2. However, marriage is not acceptable to respondents No.5 to 7, thereby giving rise to apprehension of harm at their hands. He further submits that detailed representation has already been submitted to the Superintendent of Police Rewari in this regard on 13th July, 2009. Without expressing any opinion as regards the validity of marriage of the petitioners, respondent No.3 is directed to look into the CRM No. M-19024 of 2009 2 representation, Annexure P-6 and take appropriate steps in the facts and circumstances of the case. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE July 16, 2009 'rajpal'