IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.5087 OF 2004 Gulabsingh Shyamsundar Singh ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.Atul Sarpande for Applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DECEMBER 15, 2004. DECEMBER 15, 2004. DECEMBER 15, 2004. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. Having regard to the seriousness of the offence, I see no reason to accede to the request for releasing the Applicant on temporary bail. The ground stated is that the father of the Applicant has met with an accident and is physically incapable of attending his daily work or requirements. Even so, not a case for releasing : 2 : the Applicant on interim bail, having regard to the apprehension expressed by the prosecution that the Applicant, if released, may not be available for the trial. Dismissed. 3. The Trial Court is, however, directed to expedite the hearing of the case and set down the case for hearing on day-to-day basis. 4. The Applicant shall extend full co-operation to the Trial Court for early disposal of the trial and if the Trial Court is of the opinion that the Applicant is responsible for the delay of the trial, that fact be recorded in the Roznama, which can be considered as and when occasion arises. 5. Application disposed of on the above terms. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.