1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO. 2662 OF 2009 Sharif @ Soel Ramzan Shaikh, .. Applicant Vs State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mrs.Sandhya Kadam , Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. K.V.Saste, APP, for the Respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 24/06/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in DCB CID, C.R.No. 210 of 2008 (CR (FIR) No.461/08) of Bandra Police Station, Mumbai. The said crime has been registered against the applicant for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 452,342,392,397 read with 34 of IPC. 3. I have perused the FIR. From the FIR, it appears, only one person committed robbery. The complainant has not made any reference to any other person. Admittedly, the present applicant T 2 is not the one, who actually committed robbery. Insofar as the applicant is concerned, there is a recovery of two gold-rings at his instance. Ms. Kadam, learned counsel for the applicant, therefore, submits that the applicant would be, at the most, liable for punishment under section 412 of IPC. She further submits that the applicant is hardly 21 years old boy. Investigation is complete. Chargesheet has already been filed. Keeping that all in view, in my opinion, continued detention of the applicant is not necessary. Hence, the following order The applicant-Sharif @ Soel Ramzan Shaikh is directed to be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount, subject to condition that the applicant shall report to the concerned police station on every alternate Saturday between 6 and 7 pm till conclusion of the trial. While passing this order, I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. Application is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.) 3