IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DECEMBER 2008 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 35656 of 2008(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RAPHY JOHN P., AGED 37, S/O.P.P.JOHN, PUTHUSSERRY PADY HOUSE, THRIPUR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SMT.PREETHY KARUNAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARANTHARAPPALLY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUDUKKAD POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THE GEOLOGIST, MINING AND GEOLOGY, THRISSUR. 4. THE I.N.T.U.C. UNION, VATTAKKOTTU MALA DESOM, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, SALIM, AGED 58, S/O.MUHAMMED, KURUKKAM HOUSE, MANGALAMTHANDU, VATTAKKOTTU MALA DESOM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR. BY SR.GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL – R1 TO R3 & R5 BY ADVS.M/S.K.S.RAJESH & M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN - R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC 35656/08 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS. EXT.P1 - A TRUE COPY OF THE QUARRYING LEASE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER DATED 29.7.2008 BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 - A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 20.10.2008. EXT.P3 - A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 30.11.2008. EXT.P4 - A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 30.11.2008. EXT.P5 - A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 30.11.2008. EXT.P6 - A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 30.11.2008. /TRUE COPY/ K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 35656 OF 2008-T ----------------------------------------- Dated 10th December, 2008. JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioner has approached this Court, alleging that the members of the 4th respondent union are demanding nokku coolie. The petitioner is proposing to start a quarry to remove ordinary earth. When the preliminary work for the same started, the 4th respondent came and demanded nokku coolie, it is submitted. 2. The learned Government Pleader, upon instructions, submitted that the information gathered by the police is that there was no demand for nokku coolie. The learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent submitted that the said respondent or its members never demanded nokku coolie and they do not intend to demand nokku coolie in future WPC 35656/08 2 also. This submission is recorded and the Writ Petition is disposed of. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE. Nm/