IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10307 of 2005 SHASHI BHUSHAN SINGH, son of late Hari Shankar Prasad Singh, resident of village Berai, P.S. Sarai, District Vaishali … Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Commissioner cum Secretary, Department of Labour, Employment and Training, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The Commissioner and Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4. The Director, Employment and Training, Bihar, Patna 5. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna … Respondents. ----------- 2. 4.1.2010 Heard Mr. Dilip Kumar Tewari, counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows: “(i) For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondents to grant and pay the petitioner the additional pay for additional work done by the petitioner. (ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ directing and commanding the respondents to give the petitioner all consequential benefits including revision of pension, leave encashment etc. after granting the petitioner additional pay for additional work done by the petitioner. (iii) For issuance of an appropriate writ directing the 2 respondents to pay the petitioner the arrear amount of difference of salary upon revision of pay scale upon recommendations of 4th Pay Revision Committee. (iv) For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondents to finalize and pay the petitioner the amount of his gratuity with admissible interest. (v) For issuance of an appropriate writ directing and commanding the respondents to recalculate/ revise the amount of unutilized leave of the petitioner by counting the D.A. of the petitioner for January, 2003 and July, 2003 and after such revision to pay the petitioner the difference of the amount of unutilized leave of the petitioner. (vi) For issuance of an appropriate writ directing the respondents to pay the petitioner interest for delayed payment of his all legitimate claims.” At the outset Mr. Tewari in the light of the stand taken in the counter affidavit filed by the Accountant General would submit that it appears that certain grievance of the petitioner have been redressed during the pendency of this writ 3 application and therefore, the petitioner may be given liberty to move the authority for the remaining grievances especially the additional pay. In view of the aforementioned stand taken by the counsel for the petitioner this Court would dispose of this writ application with an observation that in case the petitioner would file a representation for claiming his additional pay and/or any other admissible amount the same will receive consideration of the authority and would be disposed of by a reasoned order expeditiously. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/