IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.19498 of 2010 Date of Decision: October 29, 2010 Amarjit Kaur .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Ms. Maninder, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing Letter dated 21.4.2009 (Annexure P-10) and Letter dated 28.6.2010 (Annexure P-11). Vide the impugned action of the respondents, benefit of three advance increments granted to the petitioner with effect from the date of acquiring higher qualification of Giani has been withdrawn. 2. Notice of motion. 3. On the asking of the Court, Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, CWP No.19498 of 2010 [2] accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Requisite number of copies of the writ petition have been handed over to learned counsel for the respondents in Court. 4. On request of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up at this stage itself for final adjudication in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. 5. Learned counsel for the parties agree that the matter can be referred to the Committee constituted under Orders of this Court while dealing with Civil Writ Petition No.16323 of 2008 titled `Smt. Sudarshana Devi & another vs. State of Punjab & others’, decided on 2.3.2010. 6. In view of the common prayer made by learned counsel for the parties, the petition is disposed of in terms of Order dated 2.3.2010 rendered by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.16323 of 2008 titled `Smt. Sudarshana Devi & another vs. State of Punjab & others’. (AJAI LAMBA) October 29, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?