IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39754 of 2008 GORAKH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.09.08. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. The case of the petitioner is that he was facing trial for offence under Section 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code and he continuously remained absent before the trial court since three dates prior to 1. 3. 2001, when his bail bond was cancelled and warrant of arrest was issued against him. The petitioner was arrested on 31. 3. 2008. Referring Annexure-2, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that three witnesses have been examined in this case and they have turned hostile. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been sufficiently penalised for his fault of absence before the trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner further says that he undertakes on behalf of the petitioner that in future the petitioner will be regularly present before the trial court when required on dates as fixed by the trial court. In the facts and circumstances, the petitioner namely, Gorakh Yadav is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Fast Track Court No.1, West Champaran at Bettiah, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 123 of 1994 corresponding to Sahodra P.S. Case No. 154 of 1992. m.p. (Chandra Mohan Prasaed, J.)