1 mp t IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 876 of 1996 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 877 OF 1996 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3995 of 1996 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.876 of 1996 M/s.Padiyar & Padiyar & ors. .. Appellants versus Union Bank of India .. Respondent ... None for the appellants. None for the respondent. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE AND D.G. KARNIK, JJ DATED : 6th March 2009 P.C.: . Both these appeals were filed by Shri S.M. Paranjape, the learned advocate and on his demise, 2 the appellants were issued with notice. The report received by the Registry indicates that appellant no.1 was not available at the given address. The appellant no.1 is a partnership firm represented by appellant nos.2 and 3. The report further shows that appellant no.2 died in 2006 and appellant no.3 died in 2008. 2. Hence appeals are dismissed for non prosecution. Interim order, if any stands vacated. Civil Application does not survive. (D.G. KARNIK, J) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J)