^ / 7 t 9 9^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. N^. ^^7~G>12005 PETITIONER t-^/ ^r ^y^ ^vio^'>>^ <JK's'y '^t^ y is^' ^.'- RESPONDENTS VERSUjS ^ ./J ,/3. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari S/o Lafe Rajendra Prasad Tiwari, aged about 26 years, R/o H- 1/16 Nutan Colony Sarkanda, Bilaspur," Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.), Lab Assistant, Seraen (C.G.) State of Chhatissgarh Through The Secretary Animal Husbandiy and Veterinary Services Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. (Chhattisgarh) The Director Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Joint Director Veterinary Services, Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh) .^' ^v srr^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUEAN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF_ _MANDAMUS/CERTIORA.RI ETC. OR ECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE ANTURE ETC. »r' liBT" XI-HC-22 ^"! '^Wvif, ^WIQ, wwwy gn^r^iT (<•<!'* sn^T ^41(ti •HT^T M.^2:3./.^ 31I^?t WffW ^(fttT Shri Rakesh Pandey,couns< Shri G.K. Beriwal, Dy. Advos^ passed.in O.A. No. 170/99. He a| petltionsr may be given an representation before the comp^t vi/hich shail be considered on its ovdn merits in accordance with law. Prayer is not opposed by ths| <^i'4l<nA!lri ^i^cfl' ^ Fs^i <^l^,l< ^T sifSgH sn^r Tforthepetitiorier. rte Generai, for the State. Learned counsel for the pstitioner [submits that the petitioner is entitied for equal pay for equa! work, wjiich has been denied. He further submits that the case of fhe pet Dewangan and others, wh'ich |has been decided by the State Adminlstrative Tribunai vide or^ler dated 10/12/1999 (Annex.P/4) |so submits that for fhe present the jspportunity of fiiing fhe detaiied of the re; State counse!. b-laving considered and wit|iout expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the opinion ser/ed if a direction is fliven td representation raising his grievancjs the respondents along v/ith' a copj| three weeks!from today, and on competent authority of the resporidents shaii decide the same on its own merits in accordance with iawjas early as possible preferabiy within ihree months from the date of rec^ipt of the representation. In cass the |of this Court, ends of justice '</J!i be the petitioner to make a detaiSed |es before the competent authority of of the petltion and this order, within 'such repressntation being fi!ed, the petitioner is required to be heard, I- remains, the petitioner may avaii th VVith the aforesald obseroati Certified copy as per rules. |e may be heard. If the grievance stiil ^ remedy available at law. 3ns, this 'petition stands disposed of. -E^ Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge