Kl::;:::l:::..t: (V y... %-0"' J. G c.<1' - >• BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ( CHHATTISGARH ) ^j|||8 BeSlgft _K2 CONTEMPT CASE N0. / ^/ 4 / 2010 PETITIONER: ,y^^ ^^ ^'. ' ^ ^ A^" •^-' ^Vyay Kumar Jain, S/o Prerachand Jain, aged about 64 years, R/o Anand Bhawan College Road, Dongarhgaon, Distt. Rajanandgaon (C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. Sunil Kujur Secretary School Education, Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) ^'^, '^ i:y^ %^^J^^ e^ 2. N* L- Scr^tooK^ District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 13.12.2007 PASSED IN W.P. (S) 7408/2007 V- CONTEMPT CASE UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMFT OF COURTS ACT, 1971. The above named applicant respectfully begs to submit as under : -r~- :-HC-22 STT^T-^T f^ti?r3n^T 5b*iicb ^f^a 1 . ^ST ^|q|<nq; ^Tl1<1^<o, f®l<!ll<iy 3TT^T ^S^K ^(/^..:.C^.^CC.1^)^^° 'i^^T' ^r^r ^<TTw^f^r SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohali Shrivastava<J. 14-02-2011 Shri Somkant Verma, oouns^ Heard. Learned oounsel fbr the peti' dated 13-12-2007 passed in W.P.( on the same terms as in the casel State Govt. af Chhattis^rh Qnd[ orofer cfetecf 12-02-2007. He submf Ram Kumar Sahu (supra) vide ord( as in the case of Paras NatH^ (W.P.(S)No.58 of 2007) wherein from the date of initial appointm^r submits that even though the petitj passed by this Court, the responde|- of regular pay scala This Court had ctearly direct^ order passed in Ram Kumar S^hu recorded that in that case, the Cou< from the date of initial appointmer|it subject to atl verifications made by| petition. Even after long lapse, th|e been extended to the petitioner an|: verifications were made by the res^c cr»i<i(<n<i1i +ii^<y?j*'?'fe^ <r^^l< ^'3rf^FT37T^T for the petitioner toner submits that this Court vide order P)No.7408 of 2007 allowed the petition lof Ram Kumar Sahu and others vs. \aiwther (W.P.(S)No.813 of 2007) by |s that this Court allowed the petitbn of ^r dated 12-02-2007 on the same terms Gupta vs. State of Chhattisgarh is Court had granted regular pay scalp jnt. Learned counsel for the petitioner >n was allowed and specific order was its have not passed any order for grant d that the petition is allowed in terms of and Others (supra) and has also had direoted grant of regular pay scale The order passed by this Court was he State regarding facts pleaded in the benefit of the aforesaid order has not it is not known whether the necessary ^ndents or not. fTft^'?f7i7r (^ -HC-22 an^T'^1 'f^TW^n^r 5t)^ict) <lRd Tumane k ^? ^iNicn^, ^nl^^Ko, i®i<rti^y 3TT^r x^ra? h^^/C)^-^c1/^1o "^ 2(fe ^ 0 HW^l 5bHI<=b 'fN^ST' 3TI^?T ^RTIW ^FrftU -^^. The respondent No.2-District law to make a II necessary verificatictns pass appropriate order in compliance| this court in W.P. (S) No. 7408 of20Cj passed and regular pay scale is not verification of necessary facts as di^ be taken against respondent No.2| necessary orders without further dela^. At this stage, instead of issuin^ liberty to the petitioner to revive petiti(| chl^I<n<I1l 'RFRTf "^ 'f^t' <r^^l< "^ 3Rrf^P=[ 3TI^T ^ducation Officer is obliged under the and subjeot to those verifioations, |of order dated 13-12-2007 passed by |7. In case, appropriate orders are not granted to the petitioner, subject to ^oted earlier, appropriate action may Respondent No.2 shatl now pass notice, petition is disposed off, giving ^n, in case eventuality so arises. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge r^ -3feq