^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.IS) No. 4600/2007 Petitioner RESPONDENTS 1 2. 3. Neelam Kumar Tiwari, s/o Dr. M.K.Tiwari, aged about 28 years, R/o village 8s Post Jiya(Jewara). Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg(CG) Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretaiy, Panchayat SE Village Development, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur. The Chief Executive Officer, Panchayat Mahasamund (CG) The Collector, Mahasamund(CG) Jila WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri Kishore Bhaduri, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents No. 1 & 3 on advance copy. ORAL^QRDER (20.8.2007) Sunil Kuinar Sinha, J. Heard. This matter relates to irregularities committed in appointment of Shiksha Karmi Grade -I. Admittedly, the subject matter is governed by the provisions of Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1997 and Rule 12 of the aforesaid rules provides for appeal before the concerned authority. In view of fhe above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. However, he prays that some observation be made so that the appeal may be expedited at the eariiest. The prayer appears to be genuine. ^ W.P.(S) No. 4600/2007 The petition is permitted to be withdrawn. It is disposed of as wifhdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a duly constituted appeal before the appellate authority under the Rules and if such an appeal is filed, the appellate authority shall try fo dispose of the appeal as eariy as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of the appeal. After filing of the appeal, if any grievance is left with the petitioner, he shall be at liberty to visit this Court again. Sdf- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge stinita y.