SAS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.852 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.852 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.852 OF 2006 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.377 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.377 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.377 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.CMC Ltd ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.F.Andhyarjuna, senior counsel with Ms.Pallavi Divekar for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- There is a delay of 1418 days in preferring the appeal. The I.T.A.T. order was received on 25/6/2002. The papers were forwarded to the Ministry of Law on 21/10/2002. The papers were returned back by the Law Ministry on 14/12/2005. Thereafter, draft of the appeal was received on 6/1/2006. There is no explanation whatsoever for the delay between 21/12/2002 and 14/12/2005 and also for the subsequent delay. Considering the cause shown, the same would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence Motion is dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.)