1 UNREPORTED IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.2105 OF 1998. Miss Usha D/o Manoharrao Sontakke, Aged 20 years, Occ.unemployed, R/o Near "Raaj Vastralaya", S.T.Bus Stand, Beed. Dist. Beed. ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra. 2. The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation through its Divisional Controller, Beed Division, having its office at S.T.Bus stand, Beed, Dist.Beed. ... Respondents. ... Mr.S.D.Dhongade, advocate for the petitioner- absent. Mr.K.B.Choudhari, Addl.Govt. Pleader for the State. Mr.A.B.Dhongade, advocate for the Respondent No.2 - absent. ... CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 09.07.2010. 2 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per S.V.Gangapurwala,J.) 1. By the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction against the Respondent No.2 to select the petitioner for the post of Conductor. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the Respondent No.2 had published advertisement on 7.10.1995 for the post of Conductor. It is further pleaded that the petitioner had passed the written examination and was called for oral interview. Thereafter, the Respondent No.2 published the select list of candidates for the post of Conductor but the name of the petitioner did not appear. It is the contention of the petitioner that she was the only lady candidate and as per the Government Resolution dated 1.8.1997, 30% reservation is to be provided for women in Public Employment. 3. The Respondent No.2 has filed an affidavit clarifying that the present petitioner was not selected by the Selection Committee in oral interview and as such no appointment order could be issued in favour of the petitioner. It 3 is also stated in the affidavit that granting 30% reservation to the women is under consideration of the Corporation. 4. In view of the fact that the petitioner could not pass in the oral interview and the Selection Committee did not select her in the oral interview, the petitioner can not claim any right for being appointed as a conductor. 5. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. Rule discharged. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (B.R.GAVAI,J.) asp/office/