IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1814/02 Rameshwar Gurjar vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Date of order : 4/11/2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Prahlad Singh for the petitioner. Shri Hemant Gupta, Additional Government Counsel for the State. ****** The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the grievance that even though he completed three years of service on 1.6.1989 and 10 years on 1.6.1999, in the work charged establishment of the respondent, he has neither been conferred with semi permanent status, nor permanent status. Shri Prahlad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset produced before the perusal of the Court, copy of the order dated 18.12.2003 which indicates that the petitioner has been pursuant to the award of the Labour Court dated 6.9.95 granted semi permanent status with effect from 1.6.1989. This has substantially remedied grievances of the petitioner. Learned counsel however submits that the subsequent order for grant of permanent status with effect from 1.6.1999 has not been passed. Learned counsel for the respondent however submits that the order dated 18.12.2003 may have been a subsequent development. Though in the reply to the writ petition, the claim of the petitioner was contested and it was contended that pursuant to award of the Labour Court, the petitioner has been reinstated and the headquarters of PHED was approached for creation of sanctioned post and unless that was done, the petitioner could not be granted the benefit of semi permanent status. In view of the subsequent developments, the impediment if any for grant of semi permanent status and consequently permanent status, to the petitioner has ceased to exist in the changed scenario. The respondents in the order dated 18.12.2003, which is taken on record, have found his service satisfactory in so far as the grant of semi permanent status is concerned. They are therefore directed to consider his case for grant of permanent status as per rules if his services are found satisfactory and issue necessary orders in that behalf in accordance with law. However, if they held otherwise, they shall pass a detailed speaking order. Compliance of the judgment be made within three months from the date copy of this judgement is produced before the respondents. The writ petition is disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/