1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 577 OF 2004 Rajesh S/o Subhashchandra Dayma .. .. Petitioner Versus Sau. Jyoti W/o Rajesh Dayma and others .. .. Respondents Shri B. V. Wagh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. S. Jadhavar, Advocate for the Respondents. CORAM : N. D. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 22ND JANUARY, 2010. ORAL ORDER : 1. Heard Shri Wagh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Jadhavar, learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the impugned orders in this petition. The first order of maintenance under Section 125 of Cr. P. C. came to be passed on 18.02.2004 by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ahmednagar and directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 800/- per month to the applicant/wife and Rs. 600/- per month to each of sons(both are minor) as prayed from the date of application and cost of Rs. 700/- was also awarded. 2. The said order was earlier challenged before the learned Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in the Criminal Revision Application 2 No. 88/2004 under Section 397 of Criminal Procedure Code. The order of Trial Court was confirmed by the Sessions Court and revision application filed by the petitioner came to be dismissed. The present petitioner is in Defence Service and he is employed. It is also informed that he is paying maintenance amount regularly. 3. I have gone through both the judgments and orders. Both the judgments are in favour of original applicants/respondents. Both the Courts below have considered the evidence on record and decided the application and revision application on merits. The amount of Rs. 800/- per month to wife and Rs. 600/- per month to each son is just and impugned judgments and orders call for no interference. There is no substance in the present petition. The petition deserves to be dismissed. The petition stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] bsb/Jan. 2010