5 \-' Petitionsr Accused Respondent Compiainant HSGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BtLASPUR Cr.M.P.No.S09of2010 Mayank Verma, S/o S.K.Verma, aged about 26 years, R/o Near Sanjay Park, Ramanujganj Road, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (CG). Versus Jtendra Sinha, S/o Kedamath Sinha, Proprietor, J.K. Associates, Chandrakanta Compi'ex, Deviganj Road, Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) (Petition under Section 482 ofthe Cr.P.C.) (SB: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) Pressnt: Mr.B.D.GuN with Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, counse! forthe petitioner. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 12m January, 2011) 1 .By this petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., the petlfioner has chaiienged tegaiityand propriety of the orders dated 10.7.2009 and 20.8.2009 passed by the Judiciai Magistrate Firet Ciass, Ambikapur, in Criminai Compiatnt Case No.330/2009, whereby ihe Court be!ow has aiiowed the amendment in compiaint reiating to father's name of ths rsspondsnt therein. 2. i have heard isarned counsel for the petitioner, perused the orders Impugned and othsr documents. 3. Learnsd counse! for the petitioner submits that the Court below has aiiovred the amsndment after iapss of six years v/ithout fiiing any appiication for condonation of dsiay in fiiing such appiication. 4. As per copy of the compiaint and orders impugned, father's name of ihe present petitioner was mentioned as B.K.Verma and vide amendmsRt, instead of B.K.Verma it has been amended as S.K.Verma. Rest addrsss, sspeciaiiy name of the petltioner is same. 5. At the outset it appears typographysicai or clerica! error which has besn corrected vide orders impugned. 6. Considering the nature of amendment, 1 do not find any itisgaisty in the orders impugned warrarrtlng any interference. Consequentiy, the petition is iiabie to be dismissed and it is hereby dism'.sssd at the motton stsgejKeff. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge