1 cac485 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. OF 2009 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. OF 2009 ...Applicant vs. ...Respondent for the applicant for the respondent CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 23, 2011 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the applicants and the learned counsel for the respondents. There is delay of 350 days in filing the revision application for challenging the decree of eviction under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. One of the grounds set out in the application is that earlier Writ Petition was filed which was converted into present Civil Revision Application. The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that even the Writ Petition was filed belatedly after execution application was filed. The learned counsel for the respondents has some grievance about the order dated 15th July 2011. It is pertinent to note that the respondents has not entered any caveat. Therefore, on 15th July 2011 this Court issued notice to the respondents. . Considering the averments made in the 2 cac485 application, a case for condonation of delay is made out. However, considering the fact that the first respondent is a Trust, the applicants will have to pay costs quantified at Rs.5,000/-. . Hence, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to condition of the applicants paying costs of Rs.5,000/- to the respondents within a period of four weeks from today. Payment of costs will be condition precedent. Ad-interim relief granted earlier will continue to operate for a period of four weeks from today. JUDGE