IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17573 of 2009 1. MANOJ KUMAR JHA S/O SRI FANI NATH JHA R/O VILL JAIRAMPUR, P.O.DHARAMPUR RATI, P.S.BIHPUR, DISTT- BHAGALPUR 2. SANJIT KUMAR JHA S/O SRI BHUNESHWAR JHA R/O VILL JAIRAMPUR, P.O.DHARAMPUR RATI, P.S.BIHPUR, DISTT- BHAGALPUR 3. NAVIN KUMAR S/O MAHENDRA PRASAD KUMAR R/O VILL JAIRAMPUR, P.O.DHARAMPUR RATI, P.S.BIHPUR, DISTT- BHAGALPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF BIHAR,PATNA 2. THE HOME COMMISSIONER(POLICE) GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE -CUM-INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE BIHAR, PATNA 4. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF null BHAGALPUR 5. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BHAGALPUR 6. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE NAUGACHHIA, BHAGALPUR ----------- 2. 24.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The only issue for adjudication is that if any person with 14 or lesser marks has been appointed in pursuance of the 3rd merit list whose candidates were require to appear for verification on 8.6.2008/9.6.2008, the petitioners may then have an appropriate case to be considered for appointment. The grievance is that the impugned order dated 24.9.2009, states that no person with less than 15 marks had been appointed and which relates to the 4th list. The petitioners have secured 14 marks. 2 The pleadings are not very clear that the petitioners were considered under the 3rd list exclusively when the impugned order does not state that whether it is based on consideration of candidature or the 3rd list or the 4th list and what the cut off mark for the appointment in the two lists were. If the petitioners file a representation within a period of three weeks, let the respondents consider the same and pass a reasoned and speaking order to facilitate judicial review, should the need arise, within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt and/or presentation of such order before him. If the respondents find justification in the claim of the petitioners, the present order dated 24.9.2009 shall be no impediment in their reconsideration, in accordance with law. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)