PET!310i?ER Applicant <s- IN^HE HON'BLE HIGILCOURTOF^SHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.JArt.2271Jsro,_^ 8?:° /_2009 SiNQLE 81 Krishna Devangan, S/o. late Sri Tulerara Devangan, aged 63 years, R/o. Village Tikari, Arjunda, Tahsil Gunderdehi, Disfa-ict Durg (C.G.) Versus ^' A-' , <3?' >-l° ''-•.. RESPONDENTS :1) Sri Ramchandra Ji Swami Mandir, Non-applicants T^-^i^ w._--^ A^-^i- ^_^--i Public Trust, Arjunda, Tahsil Gunderdehi, District Durg (C.G.) :2) Durgesh Kuinar Sharma, S/o. Punishottara Prasad Sharma, aged // . 42 years, R/o. Village Bharda, Tehsil Gunderdehi, District Durg (C.G.) :3) Bodhan Singh Belchandan, S/o. Bachan Singh, aged 75 years, R/o. Village Sibdi, Tehsil Gunderdehi, District Durg (C.G.) :4) Bhagwat Prasad Chandrakar, S/o. Sri Shivcharan Chandrakar, aged 75 years, R/o. Village Arjunda, Tahsil Gunderdehi, Dista-ict Durg ^ (C.G.) Registrar, Public Trust, Patan, y.-ys.y >*A^\r£:-'' K'3y-&('',Y'-'" ^w <~!' "<? /^ / ?E>..\. '"'^f' ^- <v '*1'" .^ \^v~i~t^y ^ 'y / 14" :5) District Durg (C.G.) 46)__-jMstri£t-Ji,iAg&r.Durg_(CJ3-r)- WRIT PETIT1QNUNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Krishna Devaneaa Sri Ram.chandra Ji Swami Mandir and others SB: HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AGRAWAL, J Shri D. S. Jain, Adv. for the petitioner. ( 3-12-20091 1. Heard on admission. 2. Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 16th Juue, 2009 passed by the District Judge, Dui^ in Civil M.J.C. No. 51/2008, whereby and whereunder, the reference under Section 27 of the C.G. Public Trust Act (briefly, the Act) has been dismissed, the instant petition has been preferred by the 3. Facts briefly stated are as under:- 4. The petitioaer along wifh Rltesh Kumar Devangan, Dushyant Kumar Devangan, Kailash Kuiaar Devangan aad Pooran Singh Thakur filed an application before the Registrar, Public Tinst to appoint fhem as new trustees after dissolvm^ the present trust functioning for Shri Ram Janki Temple. After inviting objections and after hearmg the parties, the Registrar, PubUc Trust based on fhe order passed in Revenue Case No. 30-B/113(1)/70-71 dated 11-12-72 dismissed the application belng not maintainable. There against, the petitioner filed a reference before fhe District Judge. The District Judge after discussing fhe matter at lengfh and after takiag into consideration Section 25 of fhe Act, held that the petitioner has no locus standi to file an application for fiUing up the vacancy or for appointment of triistee aad dismissed the reference. ^^s^ ^^-^ ^ s ••^.-;'^^;;^ f' 5. Maving heard learned counsel for the petitioner and havini perused the order impugned, I do not find any substaaces m the petition. The application preferred by fhe petitioner was for dissolution of the trust and for appotntment of new trustees including hlm. As per Section 25 of the Act, the petitioner has no locus standi to file such application and, fherefore, the reference has rightly been dismissed by fhe trial Court. The petitioner utteriy failed to demonstrate any groiuid warranting interference in exerd.se of supervlsory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by this Court. 6. It is wefl settled principles of law Chat this Court, in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of fhe Constitution of India, should refrain itself froia tnterferinj with fhe order passed by fhe Court below except in such cases where perversity, illegality or jurisdictional error is writ large on fhe face of fhe record, which is not in the present case. 7. In view of the above discussion, the petition is Uable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed at admission stage. Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge