IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH MAY 2010 / 29TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 15294 of 2010(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- THE MANAGER, M.M.H.S.S.UPPOOD, EAST KALLADA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKKAD SRI.C.JOSEPH JOHNY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOLLAM. 3. SMT.C.R.LEKHA, LPSA, M.M.H.S.S., UPPOOD. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.DILIP MOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 15294 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of May, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the Manager of M.M.H.S.S, Uppoodu in Kollam District. The grievance of the petitioner relates to the non-approval of appointment of the third respondent on the ground that the said school is an uneconomic school. Ext.P2 is the order passed in that regard by the second respondent. Feeling aggrieved by Ext.P2 order, the petitioner herein moved the first respondent by filing Ext.P4 review petition under Rule 93 of Chapter XIV A of the Kerala Education Rules, 1958 (for short 'the Rules' only). Ext.P4 review petition is still pending before the first respondent. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that by mistake, Ext.P4 has been described as a review petition filed under Rule 93 of Chapter XIV A of the Rules and, in fact, it is a revision petition filed under Rule 92 of Chapter XIVA of the Rules. I find no reason to reject the said contention as after perusing Ext.P4, I am of the view that it is, in essence, a revision petition under Rule 92 of Chapter XIV A of the W.P.(C) NO.15294/2010 2 Rules. Therefore, there will be a direction to the first respondent to treat Ext.P4 as a revision petition filed under Rule 92 of Chapter XIV A of the Rules and pass orders thereon expeditiously, at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner as also the third respondent shall be afforded with an opportunity of being heard prior to the passing of orders on Ext.P4. This Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) NO.15294/2010 3 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. W.P.(C). NO. /2010 JUDGMENT 11th May, 2010 W.P.(C) NO.15294/2010 4