IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1302 of 2003 RAM RAJ PRASAD Versus A.K.SINHA & ANR ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh For the Respondents: Mrs. Nilu Agrawal, G.A.10. ------------ P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ------------ Dated, the 7th July, 2008. After having heard counsel for the applicant and the Government Advocate, we are satisfied hat no further order needs to be passed in this contempt application in view of the admitted fact that the order of this Court dated 10.9.2001 has been complied with, although belatedly. It is relevant here to reproduce paragraph 3 of the rejoinder filed by the petitioner to the show cause wherein following statement has been made: “ That it is humbly stated that petitioner is fourth grade employee and writ petition of the petitioner was disposed of on 19.9.2001 and after lapse of about seven years Opposite parties complied the Hon’ble Court after harassing several years of the petitioner hence the petitioner may be compensated for such long time litigation.” Thus, the petitioner has admitted that the order has been complied with but his grievance is that it was done after about seven years. The order having been complied with, we are satisfied that nothing further needs to be done in the matter. - 2 - As regards payment for the work which the petitioner is said to have done after termination, we are afraid, this aspect cannot be gone into in contempt jurisdiction. M.J.C. is, accordingly, disposed of. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J AMIN/-