1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 7039 of 2011 alongwith CWP No. 7315 of 2011. Decided on: 1st September, 2011. 1. CWP No. 7039 of 2011 Suresh Kumar Thakur Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 2. CWP No. 7315 of 2011 Sudesh Kumar & ors. Vs. State of H.P. & anr. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate in CWP No. 7039 of 2011. Mr. Surender Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate in CWP No. 7315 of 2011. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim the benefit of ad-hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and 2 increments. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State of H.P. As prayed for, it is open for the petitioners to bring this fact to the notice of the respondents who shall examine the same. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment, referred to above and take appropriate action, within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, alongwith their representation(s) and copy of the writ petition(s) as well as a copy of the judgment, referred to above, by the petitioner(s) before the competent authority. 2. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 1st September, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/hl) Judge.