fflGH COURTOF CHHATnSGARH: BILASPCR WRIT PETIT(ON N0.3984 OF 2006 PETITIONER Smt Chflrekha Bai, wife of Shri Suresh Kaudult, aged about 27 years, resident of village Banihani, Tahsfl Kawadha, District Ka1nrdham(CG). RESPONDENTS Fresent:- Versus 1. State <rf Chhattisgarii, flirough ihe Secretary, Panchayat and Rwal Develojanent Depatmen^ Mantralaya, D.K.S. BIiawai, Raipur (CG). 2. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Bamhani, Jsmpad Panchayat Kawardha, Dist Kawardha (CG). 3. Secretary, Gram Pmchayat, Bamhani, Janpad Panctuyat Kawardha, Dist Kawardha (CG). 4. Project Qfficer, Ekikrit Bal Vikas Paiyojna, Kawardha, District Kabirdharm (CG). 5. Chief Executive OSBcer, Janpad Panchayat, Kawardha, Distriot Kabirdhann (CG). 6. Smt. Heera Bai, wife of Rajedi, Angan Badi Woricer, Gram Panchayat Banihani, Block Qfflce Kawardha, District Kabndhann (CG). (Writ Petitian under Article 226 oflhe Cfmstitution ofbidia) Single Bench: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Ms Rinki TamrakM', counsel for Ihe petitioner. Ms. Suuita Jain, Panel Lawyer for flie State. Shri Viprasen Agrawal, eounsel for <fae respondents No.2 & 3. Shri Sunut Venna, connssl fw <he resp<mdent No.5. Shri B.D. Guru, counsel for <he respondent No.6. ORALORDER (Passed on this 25"' day ofMareh, 2009) fii view of the decision of flus Court in Smt Ram Bai vs. State of Chhattis^jarb <fe Others, leamed counsel qipearing for the petitioner, on instruetions, seeks pemussion offliis Court to wilhdraw Ihis petition with liberty to take recourse to any ofher statutory fonun (hat may be available to flie petitioner under the provisions of law, to which leamed caunsel appearing for flie respondents haw no objection. 2) Accordingly, fiie writ petition is dismissed as wifhdrawn with the aforesaid Uberty. 3) Consequently, M.(W.).P.No.3100 of2006 stands disposed of. ' WP (S) No.6031 of2006 (24-4-2008) Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge