IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM THURSDAY, THE 29TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 7TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 24666 of 2011(G) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ ARAKKAL PRABHAKARAN SELVARAJAN, HOUSE NO.14/516,ARAKKAL HOUSE, KOTHAPARAMBU P.O, S.N PURAM, KODUNGALLUR 680 668. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. M/S.APPLE A DAY PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,APPLE TOWER,PALARIVATTOM,EDAPPALLY BYE PASS ROAD,EDAPPALLY, P.O KOCHI 682 024. 2. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOCHI CITY,ERNAKULAM PIN 682 011. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THRIKKAKARA,ERNAKULAM PIN 682 028. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THRIKKAKARA,ERNAKULAM PIN 682 028. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 24666 of 2011(G) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS EXT.P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT FOR SALE IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER DATED 12/09/09. EXT.P2:- TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATED 12/09/09. EXT.P3:- TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED EXECUTED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER DATED 16/10/09. EXT.P4:- TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE COMMISSIONR OF POLICE DATED 30/05/11. EXT.P5:- TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 01/06/11. EXT.P6:- TRUE COPY OF THE COMPANY APPLICATION NO.536/11 IN C.P. NO.16/11. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ W. P. C. No.24666 of 2011 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 29th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J We directed the learned Government Pleader to seek instructions from respondents 3 and 4, the concerned police officers as to the correctness of the accusations in the Writ Petition regarding police harassment. The learned Government Pleader submitted on the basis of instructions received from respondents 3 and 4 that no complaint against the petitioners has been received from the 1st respondent or from anybody else by those officers. Those officers do not require the attendance of the petitioners. Therefore, there is no question of those officers harassing the petitioners at the behest of the 1st respondent. The learned Government Pleader also submitted that probably the Sub Inspector of Police, Palarivattom may have received some complaint. We record all the submissions of the W. P. C. No.24666 of 2011 -2- learned Government Pleader and close the Writ Petition without granting the directions sought for. This judgment however, will not preclude the petitioners from instituting fresh proceedings arraying proper respondents. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE C. K. ABDUL REHIM JUDGE kns/-