THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA Rev.CRPMP.No.791 of 2012 in C.R.P.No.3938 of 2011 Date of Order: 24-01-2013 Between: Gollu Venkateswara Rao and Company and others ..Petitioners and 1. Bhogavali Rajeswara Rao and others ..Respondents The Court made the following Order: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA Rev. CRPMP.No.791 of 2012 Oral Order: This Review CRPMP is filed against the order dated 25-11-2011 made in C.R.P.No.3938 of 2011. This Court while dismissing the revision petition held as under: “Having heard the learned counsel on either side, I see no infirmity or irregularity in transferring RCC.No.11 of 1995 by the learned District Judge from the file of Principal Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem to the file of the learned Principal Civil Judge, Tanuku inasmuch as the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem, himself wrote a letter to the District Judge stating that he was the counsel to the second petitioner. Having regard to the same, I need not go into the merits of the legal submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners as to whether the District Judge has power to transfer the case pending before the Rent Controller.” Challenging the said order the petitioner has filed the present review petition stating that the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem was never a counsel for the petitioners or the respondents and the oral statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents on the date of disposal of revision is totally false. In view of the above, this Court by order dated 07-03-2012 directed the District Judge, West Godavari to send a report about the reasons for transferring of R.C.C.No.11 of 1995 from the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem to the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tanuku. Accordingly, the District Judge, West Godavari sent his report, which clearly shows that RCC No.11 of 1995 has been withdrawn from the file of Principal Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem and transferred to the Court of Principal Civil Judge, Tanuku for disposal according to law, by virtue of District Court’s proceedings Dis.No.5495, dated 27-08-2011. As the case—RCC.No.11 of 1995 has already been transferred from the file of Principal Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem to the Court of Principal Civil Judge, Tanuku, I do not find any merit in the Review CRPMP and the same is accordingly dismissed. ____________________ ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J. 24-1-2013 Murthy