acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1092 OF 2009 Ms. Veena Nandlal Goswami ..Petitioner. Vs. Mr. Kishore Nandlal Goswami & Anr. ..Respondents --- Shri N.V. Pradhan i/b Ms. Shubhada Khot, for the Petitioner. Mrs. U.V. Kejriwal, APP for the State. --- CORAM: V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED: 24 TH SEPTEMBER 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved on account of rejection of her discharge application, by order dated 2.4.2009 in criminal case no.152/PW/2008 pending on file of learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dadar. 3. Heard. 4. The impugned order shows that prima facie case is made out aginst the petitioner on the basis of investigation papers. The opinion of the hand-writing expert is received by the prosecution. The learned 1 Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate observed that the opinion will be made available when sealed envelop would be opened in the court. A copy of the opinion letter is required to be furnished to the accused. The learned Magistrate to ensure that the copy of the opinion letter is furnished to the petitioner and, if so required, by opening the sealed envelop in the court before the trial begins. 5. The petitioner will be at liberty to apply afresh, only in case such hand-writing expert’s opinion would be of some help to him. A copy of the forged documents be also furnished to the petitioner. 6. With above directions, the petition is dismissed with liberty to file application as above for discharge. ( V. R. KINGAONKAR, J. ) 2