1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7124 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL ST.NO.13902 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr. P.V. Mandlik, Sr. Counsel i/b. Mr. A.S. Gandhi Advocate for Applicant. Mr. V.C. Misal Advocate h/f. Mr. Rajendra Deshmukh Advocate for Resp. Nos.1, 2 & 5. Mr. N.K. Tungar Advocate for Respondent No.5. CORAM : K.K. TATED, J. DATE :18TH JULY, 2009 1. Heard Mr. Mandlik, learned senior counsel for the Applicant, Mr. Misal learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 5 and Mr. Tungar, learned counsel for Respondent No.7. 2. Present Civil Application is preferred by original defendant No.1 for condonation of 5 days delay in preferring the Second Appeal against the Judgment and decree passed in Regular Civil Appeal No.153 of 1995 passed by District Judge-2, Ambajogai dated 23rd March, 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders 2009 arising out of the Judgment and decree passed in Regular Civil Suit No.90 of 1985 by Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ambajogai. Learned counsel for the Respondents opposed the present Civil Application. 3. Considering the averments in the Civil Application, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) which reads as under: "(B) The delay of 5 days caused in filing the Second Appeal "Shrikant vs. Santosh", which arises out of Judgment and decree passed by the learned District Judge-2 Ambajogai, dated 23/3/2009, which arises out of Judgment and decree dated 31/3/1995 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ambejogai in R.C.S. No.90 of 1984, may be condoned." 4. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. [K.K. TATED, J.] asb/JULY09/ca7124.09