1 MSS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2007 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 40 OF 2004 GEETA SATYAPRAKASH PANDEY .. APPELLANT Vs. SATYAPRAKASH ABHAYRAJ PANDEY .. RESPONDENT Ms. Anuradha Shinde i/b K.H. Giri for appellant Ms. Sangita Patil i/b A.G. Damle for respondent CORAM:SMT.RANJANA DESAI & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATE: 2/5/2008 P.C. . Learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent state that parties have settled all their disputes and they wish to file consent terms. 2. Respondent is present in the court. Appellant is not present in the court. The appellant’s father Adyaprasad Tripathi is present in the court. He states that the appellant has authorized him to enter into consent terms on her behalf. 2 3. Consent terms duly signed by the appellant’s father and her lawyer and by the respondent and his lawyer are taken on record and marked "X". 4. Order in terms of the consent terms. Undertakings contained in the consent terms are accepted by this court. 5. If the amount is deposited, the office shall permit the appellant Smt. Geeta Satyaprakash Pandey to withdraw the said amount without furnishing security to this court. 6. Family Court Appeal as well as civil application are disposed in view of the aforesaid consent terms. JUDGE JUDGE