IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.68 of 2008 SURYABALI RAI @ SURAJBALI RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02 07.01.2009 Heard. Petitioner seeks liberty to file an appeal againt the judgment and order of acquittal recorded by the learned trial court. Under the impugned judgment the opposite parties have been acquitted of the charges punishable under section 379 of the Penal Code. This court perused the judgment. Paragraph no. 9 of the impugned judgment indicates that the parties are on inimical terms since long. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also admitted before this court that there is ongoing land dispute between the parties. The learned trial court has also highlighted the fact that even one of the son of the complainant C.W.4 has not supported the case spelt out by the complainant in the complaint in course of his evidence. This court, on consideration of reasons assigned by the learned trial court, is of the view that the cause of justice shall not be served in allowing the present application seeking leave to file appeal. The application has no merit and the same is dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)