^ HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR (Division Bench) Coram: Hon'blc S^uiJagdisii Bhalla, Ag.C.J, & Hon'ble Stiri Satish K. Agnitootri, J. Wnt_Petitipn (L) Np. 4921 of 2007 Petitioner Grasim Industries Limited, a Kcgisterccl Coxnpaay uadcr Coiupany's Act, wittt ttie Registear of Coinpanies, M.P., (Jwatior, ninnin^ Ceinent PIant, Grasun Cement at ViMage Rawan, Post Grasun VBiar, Tah Sinaga, Dist - Rajpur, through Shri H. Mafflc, Vice President, (P&A), and Kacto"/ Manager, Urasim Cenxent, Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Sccrctaiy, Labour Departi&ent, Govt. of C.G., D.K.S. Bha.wan, Raipur. 2. Labour Coinmissioner, Uovt. of C.G. Meera Datar Road, SJiankar Nagar, Kalpur. WMT PET!T!OM (mPBR ARTICLE 226 OP THE CONSTITUTIOB OP INDIA Sliri N. K. Vyas, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri N. K. Agarwal, Deputy Advocate General for the respoadeafs/State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on tMs 25th day ofOctoher, 2007) The fonowiag oral order oftlie Court is passed by Hoa'fele Stei Jsgdish Bhaaa, Acting C.J. Shri N. K. Agarwal, leanied Deputy Advocate General in.form.s that therc is a clerical error in fhe wordings of item No. 16 of Schedule -A of tlie Notffication dated 7.8.2002 contamed iu Aunexure P/1 and the Notiiication dated ^•p K ^' - .. • 27.10.2006 contemed iu Annexure P/2 which reads as under- "qftRrc-ar ^TrPT tcH aStPW i^ a'(Tfe aj^Rld WtuFff qft s}^ 16. ^ftfe qTcr gp-rar ^e ^ ^ 1 WWFT a?-iT ;riWe Pwi:OT ^ f?raSuFT' It has been further informed that the necessaiy conigenda wffl be issued veiy soon. lu the light of the above statement, tlie petition has become mfructuous. AccordiBgly, the petition stauds disposed of. Sd/- Acting ChiefJustice Sd/- Satish K. Agnaiotrl Judge Thakui V-