IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7980 of 2011 Ashok Singh @ Ashok Kumar Singh S/o late Haridwar Singh, R/o vill. Akthiyarpur, P.S. Sarai, Dist. Vaishali --- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Director Consolidation, Bihar, Patna 3. The Dy. Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna 4. The Dy. Director, Consolidation Vaishali at Hajipur 5. The Consolidation Officer, Vaishali, Dist. Vaishali at Hajipur 6. Nawal Kishore Singh son of Late Awadh Bihari Singh R/o Vill. Jagdishpur P.O.Jarang, Rampur P.S.Vaishali O.P. Belsar, Dist. Vaishali. ---Respondents. For the petitioner : Mr. S.P. Srivastava, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kumar Mandal, S.C.24 ----------- 02 04.05.2011 Heard. The issue involved in this case is the status of Kalawati Devi. According to the petitioner, Kalawati Devi was daughter of Tapeshwar Singh. According to respondents Tapeshwar Singh had only one son namely Ram Lagan Singh and no daughter. The revisional Court after hearing both the sides found as under:- “…The petitioners have also failed to prove by my document that they are related to the Ram Lagan Singh. They have orally claimed that Kalawati Devi was D/o late Tapeshwar Singh Kalawati Devi and they are sons of Kalawati Devi. But they have not been sister of Ram Lagan Singh and at the same time they have accepted that Ram Lagan Singh died issueless who comes from the family of Daroga Singh. Since Guddar Singh and Tapeshwar Singh were two sons of Daroga Singh and Ram Lagan Singh was sole son of Tapeshwar Singh. The opposite party Nawal Kishore Singh is grand son of Guddar Singh, therefore the entire property left by Ram Lagan Singh devolved with Nawal Kishore Singh and the petitioners are not entitled for any share from the same. Since they are not related to Ram Lagan Singh in any manner.” 2 This finding based on pleadings on records cannot be upturned. Petitioner, if so advised, may approach competent Court for declaration of status of Kalawati Devi who is claimed to be grand mother of the writ petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a Title Suit has already been filed by respondent no.6. However, no document relating thereto has been produced. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits, and in my view fairly, that the petitioner would be contesting the said suit. The application stands disposed of. Sym (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)