Correction/Modification Application No. 439 of 2011 Delay Condonation Application No. 6048 of 2011 IN WPSB No. 83 of 2008 Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. Mr. Manoj Tiwari, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Sandeep Adhikari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. We have considered the averments made in the application for condonation of delay in filing the correction/modification application and, being satisfied with the reasons furnished, we allow the application and condone the delay. The petitioner contends that we have proceeded on the basis that first advertisement was published in 2003, whereas the same was, in fact, published in 2002. We do not think that such correction is at all necessary because we have not concluded the matter on the basis of the said advertisement, inasmuch as, the fact remains the petitioner did not raise any grievance in relation to his non-selection on the basis of the response given to the first advertisement. He responded also to the second advertisement. By the judgment and order, we felt that this response should be reconsidered and, accordingly, concluded the matter. The same is absolutely clear from the tenor of the judgment. We, accordingly, refuse to effect any correction. The correction application is dismissed. (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 12.07.2011 Aswal