1 NMW209.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.209 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.756 OF 2010 Mrs.Kalpana Bhagwan Pawar & Anr. )..Petitioners Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors.)..Respondents ---- Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni with L.D.Utangale i/by Utangale & Co. for respondent no.2 in support of Notice of Motion. Ms.V.S.Gharpure for respondent/MCGM. Mr.Milind More AGP for State. Ms.Asha Nair i/by Divya Shah & Associates for respondent nos.4 to 6. None for the petitioners. ---- CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ DATE : 1st December 2011 PC 1 The learned Counsel Mr.Kumbhakoni submits that the S.R.A has already taken a decision on 7th September, 2011, though the same was not taken within three months from the date of the 2 NMW209.11.sxw order of the High Court in the writ petition. He further submits that the Division Bench while disposing the writ petition has asked the S.R.A to take a decision preferably within three months which really is not an outer limit. He submits that this Notice of Motion is filed by way of abundant precaution as the other side has filed contempt petition. 2 Considering the averments in the Notice of Motion, we extend the time for deciding the representation by 10th September, 2011. 3 It is submitted that the Notice of Motion is already served upon the original petitioners as well as advocate appearing in the contempt proceedings, but he has not chosen to remain present. In any case, in our view, whether the time is to be extended or not is the discretion of the court and considering the averments made in the Notice of Motion, time is extended upto 10th September, 2011 for deciding the representation. 4 Subject to what is stated above, Notice of Motion is disposed of. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J) (P.B.MAJMUDAR,J)