IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45249 of 2007 RAM NARESH YADAV & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 30.7.2008. This application has been filed for clarifying this Court’s order dated 22.2.2007 whereby the petitioners were granted bail with certain conditions. There appears to be some confusion with respect to condition no.(a) in the bail order which reads as follows: “they shall attend the court regularly and in case, they abscond for two consecutive dates, their bail bonds are liable to be cancelled by the court below.” The petitioners were released on bail on 28.2.2007 and thereafter they did not appear before the court below and their bail bonds were cancelled on 14.3.2007. From the order sheet produced by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, it appears that the charges have been submitted in the court on 2.3.2007 and the matter is now pending for cognizance. It also appears from the order sheet that the accused persons are not attending the court on regular basis and there is no specific order by the court below seeking their attendance until such time that cognizance has not been taken against the accused persons and notice issued. I, therefore, clarify and state that the petitioners would be required to attend the court regularly after the court passes an order - 2 - taking cognizance and notice of the order of taking cognizance is issued to the petitioners. This application is accordingly, disposed of with the aforesaid clarification. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)