KlweW 'l '\v Mt{ IGowri HIGH GOURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (SiNO. 1^ 4 OF 2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 2. 3. Sudhir Kumar Sinha, aged abput 59 years, S/o Late Sashi Bhusan Prasad, PO Bisrampur Cotliery, Dist. Surguja (CG). Versus Coal tndia Ltd., through its Chairman- cum-Managing Director, 10 Netaji Subhas Road,KolKata-700001. South Eastern Coaffields Limited, through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, SeepatRoad, Bilaspur (CG). T.K. Bhattacharya, .Ghief General Manager (Sales & Marketing), Mahanadi CoalfleldsUmited,Sambalpur(Orissa}. ^Vrit petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shrt R. Mukhopadtiyaycounselforthe petittoner. Shri P.S.Koshy, counselfor the respondente; ORALORDER (Passed on this20 ctayof March,2009) With the consent of teamed counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finally. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submite that the petitioner does not want to contest the maBer. at this stage. However, learned counsel praysthat the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation before the authorities concerned to consider his case after affording opportunity ofpersonal hearing tothe petitioner. 3) Shri Koshy, learned counsel for the respondente, who present in the Court, submits that, in the event, a representetion is made bythe peh'tioner, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its tef. ' :• • • . . • ' ' . . • • own merits, after complying with the principles of natural justice in its letter and spirit;within a period of eight we$te from the date of receipt of the representation. - 4) In view of the foregoing, according to leamed counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudicatjon. S) Accordingty, the writ petitjonstands disposed of. V^i^ Sd/- , ,„: Sat.b^nibotrt Judge V-fS^^S. ®!S "SvS '^•"^s 'iO sSsS •i!aaa a a K9 B%ll a ;a-'%;'a ^m sL. .srisa