IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16714 of 2011 Sursatia @ Sursatia Devi, Wife of Late Chhotan Ram, Resident of Mohalla :- Ratanpura Garha, P.O. – Chapra, P.S. – Bhagwan Bazar, District – Saran, Retired Sweeper, Nagar Parishad, Chapra…..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. Nagar Parishad, Chapra, through its Executive Officer, At & PO & PS:- Chapra, District – Saran. 3. The Chairman, Nagar Parishad, Chapra, At&PO&PS: - Chapra, District – Saran. 4. The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Chapra, At & PO & PS:- Chapra, District –Saran. ………….. Respondents ---------------------------------- 4 27.09.2011 Heard Sri Mahesh Narayan Parbat, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ranjan Kumar Dubey, learned AC to Government Pleader No. 23, who appears for respondent no. 1 /State and Sri Rakesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2, 3 & 4 /Nagar Parishad, Chapra. The petitioner, who retired as class IV employee (Sweeper) on 30.06.2008 from Chapra Municipality, Chapra now Nagar Parishad, Chapra, has prayed for directing the respondents to pay arrears of difference of salary and other retiral dues. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has also filed representation before the authority concerned. However, neither decision has been taken on his representation nor retiral dues have been paid. In view of the facts and circumstances, the court is of the opinion that writ petition can be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh detailed representation before respondent no. 4 /Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Chapra within a period of six 2 weeks for the relief sought for in the present writ petition. If such representation is filed, respondent no. 4 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no. 4 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, respondent no. 4 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Respondent no. 4 is further directed to take steps for fixing and paying pension to the petitioner, if petitioner is entitled for the same, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)