HIGH COURT OF CHHA TTISGARH AT BILASPUR Wrif Pefifion (s) No. 741 of 2007 Pam-inner R_K. Dixi‘r Versus Respondenis Sic-re of Chha‘rfisgarh & ofhers single Bench: Hon‘ble Mr. Jusfice Sufish K. Agniho‘h‘i. Mr. Dewsh Chandra Verma, Advocai'e for fhe petifiomr. Smf. Anju Abuja, Depufy Govt. Advoca'i'e for The S‘l'afe/respondenfs O R D E R (Passed on 8‘“ Day of February, 2007) The foHcwing order of fhe Cour? was passed by safish K. Agnihofri, J'. 1. Thz pefi‘rioner, who was working Sfdisfical Clerk, Colleci'orm'e Raipur, has been shiffed f0 ofher secfion, nameiy, Bandhua Majdoor Secfion wifhin fhe some office premises by fhe Collec?or, Raipur vide order dated 22.1.2007 (Annexure P/6). . Learned counsel appearing for the pe‘l'h‘ioner submi‘rs fhaf sniffing of fhe pefifioner from one place 1'0 ofher' place wifhin shor'r period amounfs fo fransfer, since the pel'i‘i'ioner has been sniffed from one branch fo ofher branch Twice wi’rhin a period of one year. This amounfs 1‘0 frequen‘r Transfer from one branch fo oi'her branch. . The confenfion of fhe pefi‘iioner deserves fo be no‘iiced only for the purpose of rejection, as shifting of the petitioner from one branch to other branch in the same office cannot be termed as transfer from one place to other place. There is no prejudice caused to the petitioner, as the petitioner has not changed his residence and the education of his children is not affected. 4. This pemion is frivclous and deserves 'to be dismissed summarily. The wri+ pefi'rion is accordingby dismissed as no? maima'mable, wi‘th cos? qunn‘l‘ified To be Rs. 1000/— (Rupees One Thousand) payable to The credi‘i of i'he Chhaii'isgurh High Courf Legai Services Commii‘tee, Biiaspur wi‘i‘hin a period -W of i'wo weeks from foday. t i‘ Sdl— i i i Satish ICAgnihotn i i Judge x i