: 1 : kbp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.257 OF 2009 Nandkumar Kisanrao Kadam ..Appellant V/s. Sau.Kamal Nandkumar Kadam .. Respondent ..... Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh i/b.Mr.Milind Deshmukh, for appellant. ..... CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATE : 9TH JULY, 2009. P.C. : 1] Appellant instituted a petition under the Hindu Marriage Act in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Baramati, District Pune being Hindu Marriage Petition No.51 of 2007 so as to seek divorce on the ground that respondent has treated appellant with cruelty. Learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Baramti, Disrict Pune dismissed the said petition by judgment and decree dated 10 th September, 2007, against which an appeal came to be filed in the District Court being Regular Civil Appeal No.89 of 2007. Said Appeal was assigned to the learned District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Baramati, : 2 : Dist.Pune. He after hearing the parties dismissed the said appeal. Hence this Second Appeal. 2] I have heard learned Advocate Mrs.Deshmukh on behalf of appellant. The judgment delivered by the learned trial Judge in specific terms indicates that the appellant failed to prove the case before him that the respondent treated with the appellant with cruelty. If this is the view taken by the learned trial Judge and the same is confirmed by the learned District Judge, this Court cannot interfere with the findings recorded by both the Courts as that would amount to reappreciation of evidence in the second appeal. 3] Before this Court no substantial question of the law is raised for the purpose of interference, the Second Appeal cannot be entertained. Hence order: O R D E R Second Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (R.Y. Ganoo, J.)