IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 21ST MAY 2009 / 31ST VAISAKHA 1931 RP.No. 367 of 2009(L) ---------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.1581/2009 Dated 22/01/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER ------------------------------------------- RASHEED.P.V., AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.SUALIMAN, PATTATHUVALAPPIL HOUSE, ATHALOOR P.O., THAVANUR VIA, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. (RC OWNER KL-54/2975). BY MR.SHOBY K.FRANCIS - ADVOCATE RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS --------------------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,MALAPPURAM. 2. TAHSILDAR, PONNAI TALUK, PONNANI, MALAPPURAM. 3. SUB INSPEPCTOR OF POLICE, PONNANI POLICE STATION, PONNANI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. MR. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR – GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- R.P.No.367 of 2009 in W.P.(C.) No.1581 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 21st day of May, 2009 O R D E R Review of the judgment is sought for on the ground that the issue regarding the valuation of the vehicle was not considered while disposing of the writ petition. Nothing is seen in the judgment to suggest that this point has been urged when the writ petition was heard, and nor the petitioner has a case in the review petition that this point was urged and was not considered. For these reasons, I feel that there is no reason to entertain the review petition. Therefore, the review petition is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg