^ StngtoBa IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR & WRIT PETITION (S) No. "_2^\ / 2011 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. ^k^^l. lt^A V--" ^•^•w^" ^^-••^ cr' .^s^'c^ --^ '>.-•'' 2. ^y^ -..e?>-" NIRANJAN S/o Shri. Saddi, Aged about 50 Yrs. Working as Safai Karmachari In Nagar Panchayat, Pendra, R/o : Itwari Bazar (Desan Para), PENDRA, Dist. Bilaspur (CG) RAMNARESH S/o Shri. Bhagirathi, Aged about 42 Yrs. Working as Safai Karmachari, In Nagar Panchayat, Pendra, R/o : Lobataraiyya Para, Near Shital Mandir, PENDRA Dist.Bilaspur (CG) State ofChhattisgarh, Through : The Commissioner, Directorate, Urban Administration and Development Department, RAIPUR-492001 (CG) The ChiefMunicipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, PENDRA Dist.Bilaspur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA sn^qiils'iw 'tT^T ^I^?T ffi*ii«i> <v- ^ST '^wi'f'f, »fli<ri6,'f^fTay (O.P-(^)v-o.,5^£l1^ sn^; 'tR^ ('^^fg^i) TOIIW ^tef an^ff SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohiin Shrivastava. J. 24-06-2011 Shri Dhirendra Mishra, coun^e Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panei aavance copy. The petitioners have fiied respondent No.1 to take appj reguiarisation ofthe petitioners in s|er Learned counsel for the petif reguiarisation promuigated by the of judgment of the Supreme Kamataka^nd others v. Uma for the petitioners. Uawyer for the State/respondent No.1 on Ithis petition for issuance of direction to fopriate steps in the matter towards arvice. poners submits that in vlew ofthepoiicy of ?tate Government on 5/3/08, in compiiance in the case of Secretarv, State of Gdurt Bevi (3) and others 12006! 4 SCC 1. the posts, the matter has been deiay< Nagar Panchayat has written to th the Nagar Panchayat vide their let( the ievei of the Commissioner, Urbi Considering the submission and iooking to the fact that the Panchavat oniv on 5/4/2011 ancS ^rafeRN iwtRff ^^6 <M<<!< •^aifgnsn^ cases of the petitioners are pendin|g consideration by the respondent / Nagar Panchayat. However, on accour(or unavaiiabiiity of sufricient number of M. He further submits that on 5/4/2011 ^ Commissioner / competent authority for sanctioning sufficient number of ^osts but till date, the petitioners are not reguiarised. Learned State counse! subftiits that the sanction has been sought by •r.dated 5/4/2011 and therefore, it cannot be said that undue deiay has beeficaused in the matter, taking decision at ^n Administration and Developments. fc made bv learned counsei for the parties ^anction has been sought by the Nagar the matter is pending at the ievei of the Commissioner, no specific directicjn is required to be issued at this stage. rRiq'.^ram^ra—FS/140—2/2011—i,5o,ooo. n^ ^s; "MIAIK'I^, aiil'y-'ifi, fsftiK-iy . to-P.W'A^-5^6; / " Wff 3IR?I SKWfi Deepii TOiraTflftaai^i — <->^ Hov/ever, the Commissioner may early as possible. In case, the ciaim of the Panchayat, within a reasonabie tji take recourse to such remedy, as With the aforesaid observatfcns (setitioners are not decided by the Nagar jme, the petitioners wouid be at liberty to ijnay be avaiiabie to them under the law. >, the petition is finaiiy disposed off. 'vpS^R ^wvS^ fs^t <R«(I< i?3TRlH 311^1 :ake appropriate decision in the matter, as Sd/- ManindraMohanShrivastava Judge