IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 3103 of 2010 Date of Decision: February 22, 2010 Raman Kumar …Petitioner Versus Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr. Girish Agnihotri, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Vijay Pal, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. The instant petition is directed against an interlocutory order dated 11.2.2010 (P-1), passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (for brevity, ‘the Tribunal’). There is nothing in the order which may persuade us to issue any direction to the Tribunal as a perusal of the order shows that the Tribunal is still in the process of examining the record with the object of ascertaining what sort of hearing is given to the parties before passing the order for withdrawing the selected candidates from the CWP No. 3103 of 2010 panel, who have after selection worked upto 22.12.2009/4.2.2010. In view of the above, no interference is called for. Dismissed. However, it is unnecessary to observe that the Tribunal will look into the application for interim relief, moved by the petitioner. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) February 22, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2