IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5667 of 2011 TAPESHWAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.03.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 210 of 2010 registered under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the truck loaded with grains were looted. During investigation, certain grains were recovered from the house of the petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that it was joint family house. Moreover, the S.P., Aurangabad, was not convinced with regard to accusation and has directed the investigating officer to collect more evidence against the petitioner. That can be a good ground for grant of regular bail. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day considering the 2 fact that the S. P., Aurangabad, has still doubted the accusation against the petitioner and considering the fact that other has been granted anticipatory bail by the learned court below if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)