IN THE HIGH. COtIR'T OF JUOie&TUSE CHHB.TriSeARH ftT BTa CT'im W,P..N0.^4-'7 2.®/2 004 PETITIONER Dr. H.C. Sodjieja S/e IiBte Shr-i sander Das, Aged abaut 58 years, Ineharge Blee'k: Medical offlcer, pr-imary HealAti eentre.Oujra, Bistrlet-Dhamtari (03}. VERSUS REWONDENTS -1^^° />1^py< ^•''-^rt.-'Y > W" ''^••".A^" ^y^^' ' / t) State «£ehattisgarh Thr©ugh-the Secretary. .Healt.R & fainlly welfare Deptt . / B..K.S. Bhawan, Ralpar (03). 2) 3t>eunder seeretary, Healtft & Family wtelfaEe Deptt. State »f ©hhatfeJ.egarli, B.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur-(CG). ^^. WBIT PETTTION t?NS>ER_ARTie!,EL_ 22S/227 OE_.THE GOMSTITUTION OF 1 y 13 TA - : ' / ^ 'Ei'i i an^IWfelW ^T sn^?T a>*i <;.- t xw 'S^T;'?tPTl^PT, (si-nl'a'is, Riciiyy. m^^^ sii^i'tra% (i?i3*"»';i) TOnwdft^an^i 18/01/2005 Shri P.Diwakar, learned Sr. C4 .the petitioner. -| Shri Akhil Agrawal, P.L. forth^ Heardon I.A. No. 9409/2004 • The matter is taken up on hearjng stands disposed of. The petitioner who is tn oha| Centte, Oujra has preferred this peti] P-1, by which the petitioner has Gujra to District Hospital, Korba. Learned counsel for the the month of June 2006 and as suct-j left for his retirement and as per EntryNo.13, "Nonnally a Qovemment gpttransfeired tf onlytw^ servlcelsSeft^orWwi if ffie transtw fs (ransferretf to his home ofsuch emptoyee." Learned counsel forthe petitij: Ophthalmologist, but he had no oppojl it will not be possible for him to disoh< hospital. . Also heard learned counsel Tor grant of stay. ffe'r btjard reffne<hsn(/s necess^ry '4>l^NtTT iTF^Jf ^ 1^%t <Rtl<^« ^StRlHSII^t • funsel with Ms. Pretha Ghoshal; cpunsel for State. : yrgent hearing. It is allowed. i. Hence, I.A. No: 9409/2004 for urgent 'ge Block IVIedical Cfficer, Primary Health ion against his transfer order of Annexure transferred from Primary l-1ealth Centre, be^n petiticjneF submit&'thatthe petitioner isto retire in lessthan oneanda:halfyearofseFvice is Geripral Book Cfreu/ar Para .1 at Serial No. 6, ^fnceroremployeeshouldnotlje yeareorfess ffian two years pf etirel^entjs wlthin two yeare ancfeven in 1hat c3Se, he should be orneariby asper tfte choice dieWct petiti|3nerfurthersubmits that the petitioher is a iftunity ta perform ophthalmte pperations and ^rge thedyties ofsurgeon in the transferred ff)r the petitioner on M.W.P. No; 5013/2004 Gi.DRJ—FS/35&-12/2000—50,QOO. T^ •<)i<<|ivt<<, ESiTily'is, [sHl-Liy,'(. M^.^.^M^0! SD^I W Ei;-li<<> ^TZiT sn^r ff)*iiqi v^v '^ss {'^•Sft^s) TCiiwdtersn^i Learriecfcoi.inselforthepetiti^nersubmitsthatinterestofjusticewould be sewed if the petitioner is permitted t< respondents against the impugnet) respondents witt'iin two monthsfrom flie date of receipt dfthe representation. )n view of this submjssion of t|ie petitioner, the petition is disposed of with a diFeetion to .the petitioher to mfeke a detailed representation before the ;:.««''"I:''''-^'.'^1':''--'-; '. ':'-1: : • ' ' responclerits^.allgging grievancea a| deoide the sarfie .within'two months reaspned order. In the meanwhile, Annexure P-1 shall not be given effe respondents and the petitioneF shall of posting. Withthe aforesaid directioni tl|ie petftion^tands disposed of. Consequently, IVI.W.P, No.50|13/2004 stands disposed ot; ':ll|<<I<;1<lll HIHCT'iffeA<Fil^l< ^siRpT.an^t ^ make a detailed representation before the order whioh shall be decided by the ainst his transfer and respondents shall |after the receipt of the representation by a |t is directed that the impugned prder vide (sttotill the representation i&deoided bythe |3e allowed to continue inthe present place -Sra