IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P. NO :823 of 2010 Between: 1. J. Prabhakar Rao and others. ..... PETITIONERS AND Smt. Kiran Kaur .....RESPONDENT The Court made the following : HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:823 OF 2010 ORDER: Feeling aggrieved by order dated 16.02.2010 passed in I.A.No.133 of 2010 by the learned III Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, the petitioners-plaintiffs preferred this revision petition. Originally, the plaintiffs filed the above suit against the defendant for the relief of perpetual injunction restraining the defendant and her men from interfering or keeping obstructions and making any opening of door way into the exclusive passage viz., 52 x 5 i.e., about 30 sq. yards more fully shown in the sketch plan in RED colour, over the property bearing Municipal Nos.4-1-174 and 4-1-174/1 forming part of 145 sq. yards of extent, situated at Hanuman Tekdi, Hyderabad. In the above suit, the plaintiffs filed the above application in I.A.No.133 of 2010 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC seeking to grant ad interim injunction restraining the defendant and her men from interfering or keeping obstructions and making any opening of door way into the exclusive passage over the property in question. The Court below ordered notice to the respondent-defendant. Feeling aggrieved by the same, the present civil revision petition has been preferred by the plaintiffs. Heard the learned Counsel and perused the material available on record. The order impugned herein is a notice. The purpose of issuing notice to the other side before passing an order is nothing but affording an opportunity to the other side to represent the case, so as to adjudicate the issue involved in a proper perspective. The approach of the petitioners at this stage of the proceedings is a premature one. Therefore, I see no merits in this C.R.P and the revision is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari Dated: 26.2.2010 Nn. HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:823 OF 2010 26.02.2010