IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.176 of 2009 CHOUDHARY BAJRANGI SINGH @ BAJRANGI SINGH S/O LATE CHABINATH SINGH, R/O VILLAGE AND P.O.KHLASPORE,P.S.BHABHUA, DISTT. KAIMUR. ------- DEFENDANT/PETITIONER Versus 1. CHOUDHARY TRIYUGI NARAIN SINGH, S/O LATE CHOUDHARY CHABINATH SINGH, R/O VILLAGE AND P.O. EKHLASPORE, P.S. BHABHUA, DISTRICT KAIMUR. 2. SMT. KAMLA SINGH, W/O RAMANUJ SINGH R/O VILLAGE KANTA, P.S. SAYADRAJA, DISTT. VARANASI, UTTARPRADESH. 3. MALTI KUER, W/O LATE DAU SINGH. 4. SUSHMA KUMARI, MINOR D/O LATE DAU SINGH U/G OF HER MOTHER MALTI DEVI, ALL R/O VILLAGE AND P.O. EKHLASPORE, P.S. BHABHUA, DISTRICT KAIMUR. 5. PREMA DEVI, D/O LATE DAU SINGH W/O SHEO DAYAL SINGH R/O VILLAGE MAHASUAN, P.O. KURASAN, P.S. BHABHUA, DISTT. KAIMUR. 6. SHAKUNTALA DEVI, W/O TARKESHWAR TIWARY 7. JOKHAN DEVI W/O RAM NARAIN TIWARY NO. 6 & 7 ARE R/O VILLAGE AND P.O. EKHLASPORE, P.S. BHABHUA, DISTRICT KAIMURE. 8. DEV SHARAN SINGH S/O BINDHYABASANI SINGH 9. SHEO SHANKAR SINGH MINOR S/O DEV SHARAN SINGH U/G OF HIS FATHER DEV SHARAN SINGH 10. DHRUB KUMAR SINGH, S/O VINOD KUMAR SINGH 11. VINOD KUMAR SINGH S/O VINOD KUMAR SINGH 12. MENU MINOR S/O VINOD KUMAR SINGH U/G OF HIS FATHER VINOD KUMAR SINGH 13. RAJESH KUMAR SINGH S/O VINOD KUMAR SINGH 14. SONU MINOR S/O DHRUB KUMAR SINGH U/G OF HIS FATHER DHRUB KUMAR SINGH OPPOSITE PARTIES NO. 8 TO 15 ARE R/O VILLAGE AND P.O. EKHLASPORE, P.S. BHABHUA, DISTRICT KAIMUR. 15. RAM PRASAD SINGH 16. RAM PEYARE SINGH 17. VASHISTA SINGH @ JAWAHAR SINGH 18. DAUHJI SING SONS OF LATE JAGARDO SINGH 19. MOSTT. BUTA KUER W/O LATE JAGARDO SINGH ALL R/O VILLAGE DATIYAON, P.S. BHABHUA, DISTT. KAIMUR. 20. USHA DEVI W/O KANCHAN SINGH D/O LATE GOPI NATH SINGH R/O VILLAGE & P.S. SONEHAN, DISTT. KAIMUR 21. DEEPAK DEVI W/O CHHATISH SINGH D/O LATE GOPI NATH SINGH R/O VILLAGE BAURAIN, P.S. CHAINPUR, DISTT. KAIMUR. 22. GIRJA DEVI W/O ANIRUDH SINGH D/O LATE LALJEE SINGH R/O VILLAGE KAMTA, P.O. UJARI SIKTHI, P.S. BHABHUA DISTT. KAIMUR. 23. KUNWAR SINGH S/O LATE SUBHAG SINGH R/O VILLAGE KARJAW, P.O. KARJEE, P.S. CHAINPUR, DISTT. KAIMUR. 24. DAYA DEVI W/O TRIYUGI NARAIN SINGH R/O VILLAGE AND P.O. EKHLASPORE, P.S. BHABHUA, DISTRICT KAIMUR. --- DEFENDANTS –OPPOSITE PARTY 1ST SET. - 2 - 25. CHOUDHARY PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH S/O CHOUDHARY BAJRANGI SINGH. 26. CHOUDHARY SANTOSH KUMAR 27. CHOUDHARYBACHHA KUMAR MINOR SONS OF CHOUDHARY PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH U/G OF HIS FATHER CHOUDHARY PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH ALL R/O VILLAGE AND P.O. EKHLASPORE, P.S. BHABHUA, DISTRICT KAIMUR. -------PLAINTIFFS-OPPOSITE PARTY 2ND SET. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Mahesh Prasad, No. 2, Adv. Mr. Rewti Kant Raman, Adv. Mr. Gopal Sharan, Adv. For the opposite parties : None ------- 3. 17/2/2009 Heard Mr. Mahesh Prasad No. 2, learned counsel for the petitioner. The defendant-petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 21.10.2008 passed by Sub Judge, 2nd, Bhabhua, in Title Suit No. 75 of 1991 whereby his prayer for grant of leave for accepting additional written statement has been refused by the trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to the subsequent events and also the fact that certain documents had been exhibited, filing of additional written statement had beome necessary on behalf of the defendant No. 1. Thus, the additional written statement should have been accepted by the court below. Trial court on consideration of rival submission has come to the conclusion that the suit is of 1999 and no sufficient reason has been disclosed by the defendant No. 1 for accepting the additional written statement at this stage which is also - 3 - apparent from his petition for grant of leave which has been brought on record by the petitioner in this Civil Revision as Annexure-2. Thus, I do not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order dated 21.10.2008. As a result, this Civil Revision is dismissed. S.Ali (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)