HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 1894 OF 2011 Between: D. Pandu S/o Late D. Ramulu, aged about 48 years ..... PETITIONER AND T.S.P. Sridhar S/o T.C. Sundhar Raj .....RESPONDENT ORAL ORDER: This revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India complaining that the Court below had failed to pass any orders on I.A.No. 320 of 2011 in R.C.No. 12 of 2011 filed by him under Section 14(3) of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960, for restoration of the amenities for the petition schedule premises. As the docket order filed by the petitioner shows that urgent notice was ordered and the matter was directed to be listed on 6.5.2011, this Court by order dated 8.11.2011 called for a report from the Court below as to the stage of the proceedings and reasons for the delay in disposing of the I.A.No. 320 of 2011. Pursuant thereto, the learned Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-XVI Metropolitan Magistrate submitted report dated 14.11.2011 stating that on 6.5.2011 appearance was entered on behalf of the respondent and counter was also filed on 1.6.2011. It is also stated that the matter was heard in part on 16.6.2011 and it was posted to next date for further arguments. In the meanwhile, the advocates abstained the Court and that apart there was also strike by the NGOs and therefore, the application could not be disposed of and the matter now has been posted to 23.12.2011. Having regard to the reasons explained by the learned Judge, no further enquiry is necessary in the revision petition. Accordingly, the revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the Court below to dispose of I.A No. 320 of 2011 on 23.12.2011 without fail after hearing both sides. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ JUSTICE G. ROHINI DATE: 16.11.2011 KA ... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. 2 CD copies.