$-3 + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRLM.C. 2085/2011 BANNY KUMAR & OTHERS Petitioners Tiirough : Mr. Sandeep Gupta with Mr. Vil<ram, Advs. versus NCT OF DELHI & ANOTHER Respondents Through : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ORDER 25.08.2011 1. Vide FIR No.115/2010 complaint was registered under Section 406/498A/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 on 09.04.2010 f against the petitioner No.l (husband) and petitioner Nos.2 to 5 (his relatives) at PS Aman Vihar on the complaint of respondent No.2. 2. Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter between the parties has already been settled in mediation cell at Rohini court on 28.05.2010. 3. Respondent No.2 Suman D/o Paras Nath is personally present with her mother namely Manju Devi. Respondent No.2 is identified by the 10 SI Rajesh Kumar. She does not dispute the Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner and further submits that she has no objection if the aforesaid FIR is quashed. 4. Respondent No.2 further submits that as per the settlement she has received ?2 lakhs, and the petitioner No.l has promised to give ^50,000/- at the time of quashing of the FIR. Ld. counsel for the petitioner has handed over a DD of ^50,000/- bearing No.225438 dated 07.04.2011 issued in favour of Suman drawn in favour of SBI, Sultanpuri, to respondent No.2 and she has accepted the same without any protest. 5. Keeping the aforesaid settlement into view in the interest of justice I quash the aforesaid FIR and related proceedings thereto. 6. Ld. APR for the State submits that the charge-sheet has already been filed and pending for framing of charges. 7. Though Government iviachinery has been used and the precious time of the court is consumed, but keeping in view the financial position of the petitioner No.l as he is a driver in a company, 1defer imposing cost on him. 8. CRL.M.C. 2085/2011 is allowed in the above terms. 9. Dasti under signature of the Court Master. SURESH KAIT, J AUGUST 25, 2011/vld