IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 289 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 98 OF 2009 D. S. HOTEL AND RESORTS (INDIA) LIMITED THROUGH JAGDISH PERSAD SURI ... Applicant Versus PASA PROPERTIES AND HOLDINGS AND 58 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. S. Malkarnekar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. J. F. De Melo, Advocate for respondents no.1 & 2. Mr. R. V. Kamat, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. Coram:- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 15th March, 2011 P.C. :- By this application, the applicant prays for substituted service as against respondents No. 55 and 58. It is reported that respondent No.58 is dead. Therefore, the appeal as against the deceased respondent No.58, stands dismissed as abated. As far as respondent No.55 is concerned, it is stated that the applicant-appellant attempted to serve him, but she has not been found on two occasions. 2. As far as respondent No.55 is concerned, we are satisfied that the notice could not be served in ordinary mode. In these circumstances, substituted service is permitted as against respondent No.55. The applicant/appellant to take necessary steps and serve respondent No.55 by substituted service, within a period of four weeks from today. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. F. M. REIS, J. ssm.