-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION A.O.NO.255 OF 2005 A.O.NO.255 OF 2005 A.O.NO.255 OF 2005 Sukh Hotels Motels Pvt. Ltd. .. Appellant (Org. Plaintiff) vs. Juhu Satellite Vision .. Respondent. (Org. Defendant) Mr. Abdi i/b. Abdi & Co., Advocate for the Appellant. Mr.Niranjan Pandit, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Mr.Rahul Chitnis for Respondent No.2. Mr.K.J.Hakani for Respondent No.5. Mr. H.N.Thakore i/b. Thakore Jariwala& Co. for Respondent 3 and 6. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATED : 28th February, 2005. DATED : 28th February, 2005. DATED : 28th February, 2005. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard Counsel appearing for the parties. The challenge in this Appeal from Order is to the Order dated 16.2.2005 passed by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court at Mumbai. The Appellant/plaintiff sought ad-interim relief pending the Chamber Summons taken out by the -2- appellant for impleading the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 as party Defendants. The impugned Order notes that the Chamber Summons taken out by the Appellant is fixed for hearing on 5.3.2005. 2. In this view of the matter no case is made out for interference at this stage. . Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. . The learned Trial Judge is directed to hear and finally decide the Chamber Summons taken out by the Appellant within a period of two weeks from today. . All contentions of the parties in the pending Chamber Summons and in the pending suit are expressively kept open. (A.S.Oka, J.)