IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12441 of 2011 1. DR. RAVINDRA MAHTO 2. DILIP MISTRY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.12689 of 2011 1. ARUN KUMAR 2. UPENDRA CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.13040 of 2011 JITENDRA SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.14370 of 2011 1. RAVINDRA MAHTO 2. ANUGRAH MAHTO 3. MUNNA KUMAR 4. MANOJ KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 24.05.2011 It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioners that father’s name of petitioner no. 1 in Cr. Misc. No. 12441 of 2011 has wrongly been typed as Jagdish Mahto in place of Khaderan Mahto. He seeks permission to make correction in father’s name of petitioner no. 1 of above stated criminal miscellaneous case. The permission is accorded. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in his application within course of the day. All the above stated petitions are taken enbloc as the said petitions arise out of Sherghaty P.S. Case No. 320 of 2010 registered under Sections 302, 307, 153 A, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 27 of the Arms Act and ¾ of Explosive substance Act and, accordingly, all the above stated petitions are being disposed of by this common order. 2 Although, all the petitioners are named in the first information report but taking into consideration that injured witness, namely, Tajun Nisha has not stated the name of these petitioners and having similar allegation, some co-accused have already been granted privilege of bail by another Bench of this Court, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghaty (Gaya) in connection with Sherghaty P.S. Case No. 320 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)