Page- 2 COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, GOVERNMENT OF M.P., DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION (DPI OFFICE) NEAR CHETAK BRIDGE, BHOPAL (MR) (3) DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, EDUCATION. DEPTT. EDUCATION DISTT. RAIPUR P.O. PENSION BADA] ARVIND NAGAR WARD RAIPUR (M.P.) BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER] GOVT. OF M.P.] BLOCK - DHARSIWA Hd.QrS —BUDHAPARA RAIPUR, DISTT.- RAIPUR (M.P.) \T APPLICATION [PETITION UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVETRIBUNAL J ACT. 1985 INO.13 OF 1985i READ WITH ARTICLES 14,16,21 & 311 OF THE i7 CONSTITUTION OF INDIA CONSIDERED WITH PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE R M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT 3W W. P. No 2483/2005 4 ‘1 ‘ sa: Hon'ble Mr. Jusme swish K. Agnihom, J j Shn' Atok Nigam, Advomfe for The pafitioners. é Miss Suni'm Jain, Pane! lawyer for the remndenfs/Smte. i QR D E R > (Passed an fhis 14*” day of December, 2006) The following order of The Court is passed by Safish K. Agnihoh'i. J. l «mod counsel appearing for the pefilioners us well as learned Panel lawyer appearing for ‘lhe respondenfs/Srafe joinfly submi'r flm‘l’ The facfs of 'l'he presen'r case are similar lo fhaf of in W. P. (5) No. 2564/2005 (Kalyan Singh Sahu & o'rhzrs Vs. State of M.P. & others), which was disposad of vide order dafed 7.9.2006. They fur-flier submi'r 'lha't 'rhe ques'l'ion of law involved is also the same. 2. In view of The above slated submissions made by learned counsel for fhe parfies ihis pe'riiion is disposed of in lerms of ihe order dared 7.9.2006 passed by fhls'Cour? in W. P. (5) No. 2564/2005. No order 3 as 'ro cosis. ' 0‘ i l ‘ , sw— , l l Salish K. Agnihotri ‘ l l Judge X Thakur \ Pefi-rioners : Sum-mm Dmgmu d: ofhers Versus Reqonderrrs : S‘M‘re of M. P. (now Smfa of Chhaffisgarh )é ofhers