(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 8628 OF 2010 Balasaheb Raosaheb Jamkar, Age : 45 years, Occupation : Agriculture, .. Petitioner R/o. Jintur Road, Parbhani, (Original respondent Taluka & Dist. : Parbhani. no.1) versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development and Water Conservation Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32. 2. Collector, Parbhani, District : Parbhani. 3. Sau. Bhavna w/o. Anil Nakhate, Age : 35 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Hadgaon (Nakhate), Taluka : Pathri, District : Parbhani. 4. Sau. Sanjivani w/o. Baburao Gore, Age : 48 years, Occupation : Household & Social Work, R/o. Umari (Malyachi), Taluka & District : Parbhani. (2) 5. Sau. Vandana w/o. Pundlik Yengde, .. Respondents Age : 40 years, (No.3 - Original Occupation : Household, complainant & R/o. Banwas, Taluka : Palam, Nos.4 & 5 - Original District : Parbhani. respondent nos.2 & 3) ....................... Mr. M.S. Deshmukh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. V.H. Dighe, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr. B.A. Shinde, Advocate, for respondent no.3 / caveator. ........................ CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 19TH NOVEMBER 2010 COURT'S ORDER (Per B.R. Gavai, J.) : 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the parties state that in a Special Leave Petition, bearing No. 24477/2010, which was listed before the Apex Court, yesterday i.e. 18th November 2010, the Apex Court has passed an order, thereby directing the Collector to proceed in accordance with law, and has further directed, that though the Collector shall pass an order, the same shall not be given effect to. (3) 2. In view of the orders passed by the Apex Court, nothing survives in the petition. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. ( K.K. TATED ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/8628wp