IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.551 of 2009 BRAJ KISHORE SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 7 16-3-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties including the State of Bihar. Although there has been considerable delay on the part of the opposite parties in complying with the order of the writ court dated 11-8-2005 even after it acquired finality on rejection of S.L.P. before the Supreme Court on 4-9-2009 but the order contained in annexure k/3 dated 4-3-2011 shows that as per direction of the writ court the petitioner has been granted age relaxation and also appointment from the back date i.e. 1-10-2005 with all financial benefit. The date of appointment given in favour of petitioner is within the time granted by the writ court for considering the case of the petitioner and apparently there has been no violation of order of the writ court. The petitioner has been given retrial benefits because during the pendency of the litigation he crossed the age of superannuation on 30-6-2009. Now when the order of the writ court stands complied with there is no necessity of keeping this contempt 2 application pending. It is accordingly, disposed of. It is expected that the benefits of pay and other emoluments and the retrial benefits shall be made available to the petitioner without any delay, preferably within six months from the date of filing of the representation for such benefits if the same have not been paid as yet. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)