(L^-i -sry In theHon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur. W.P.N6:f2..'c-.f2;tB0....2006 Petitioner ResQonderts Ramesh Kumar NirmaUtar, aged 39 years, S/o Amol Ram Nirmalkar, Asstt. Grade IL Tahsil OfBce Distt. Durg (C.G"] Versus v%z° <%' 4. ' The State Govt. of CUhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, >^-'"' fc^ ..• Revenue Deptt. Ministoy, !^ ^'..-•"" D.K-.S.Bhawan, ' ' ^-Ff ..-•'" -.-—.—-..-, Raipur (C.G.) / 2. The Collector, i^^i^r^^ a^'f- ^! Durg ^ Writ Petition UnderArticles 226/227 of The Constitution Of India forthe issuance of WRIT in the nature of MANDAMUS certiorari, Prohibition and for other suitable writ or writs. order or orders. direction or directions. ^y' XI-HC-78 timcii ai*ii* 3^'^iraRTq', yxnu'is, Ric-iKiy ^^.La^P....^afe^200& 3TI^?TT3?R (^qtg^ET) sn^T^Tf^iN; aw3n??Tstiti[<ti ^5b^( 5T<iTWflfer3n^r <tii'iitd*Tl-f HiiflT ff te^t <Rit<i< ^sif^iTsnSsr 14-8-2006 Shri Ajay Shrivastava, couns|el for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Dep(ity Govt. Advocate for the State/ respondents, on advance copy. l-1eard. By this petition, the petition^r has challenged the order dated 7-7- 2006 wherebythe petitioner has be^n transferred from Saja to Bemetara. The main ground of challe|nge is that the pet'rttoner is disabled person, his wife is also disabled pe|^on and the petitioner has five children "and a!l are minor. Learned counsel for the petiponer submitted that the petitioner may be atlowed to make a represent^tion to respondent No.1 and he be directed to decide the same, to whi ;h learned counsel for respondents has no objection. Having heard learned coun^el for the frarties, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the ca^e and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the petitioner is allowed to make a detaited representation along with a copy of ail his grievances within a period respondent No.1 shall decide the period of 30 days from the date considering all the points raised by With the direction aforesaid, this petition to respondent No.1 raising of 10 days from today and in turn, epresentation of the petitioner within a of receipt of the representation, after ;he petitioner, in accordance with law. ~ the petitiori stands disposed of. ConsequenUy, M.(W.)P, No.^320/2006 also stands disposed of. Parties are entitled for certifi^d copy ofthis order. Sd/ L.C. Judge P.T.O. /