IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.5218 of 2009 Decided on : 12.10.2009 Dhanna ... Petitioner versus Chhotu Ram ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. P.R.Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondent. **** 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed against the order dated 01.09.2009 declining the application for framing of additional issue to the following effect: i) Whether the plaintiffs have executed a sale deed in favour of defendant regarding the suit property on 31.01.1964? Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the case of the petitioner is that he has purchased the property in dispute from the respondent while as per respondent no sale deed has taken place between them. He therefore, prays that the proposed issue is the necessary issue. He further informs me that in any case the onus of the proposed issue would be on the petitioner and since the case is fixed for the evidence of the defendant, no prejudice will be caused to the respondent-plaintiff. CR No.5218 of 2009 -2- None has appeared on behalf of the respondent to oppose the same. In these circumstances, this revision petition is allowed and the proposed issue is directed to be framed as issue No.(g). October 12, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE