IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2009 / 1ST ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 26609 of 2009(U) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- DEEPA SUGATHAN, W/O.SUGATHAN, KALLINGAKUDIYIL, KALOOR KARA, KUMARAMANGALAM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK. BY ADV. SMT.R.RANJINI RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THODUPUZHA MUNICIPALITY, THODUPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, THODUPUZHA MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, MUVATTUPUZHA ROAD, THODUPUZHA. BY ADV. MR. P.K.SOYEZ, SC, THODUPUZHA MUNICIPALITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.26609 of 2009-U = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioner was issued a provisional notice for removal of a particular allegedly unauthorised construction. She filed objections. Ext.P4 final order has been issued. That is one that can be challenged before competent higher authorities in accordance with law. However, the final order is sought to be enforced within a period of seven days. After having heard the learned counsel for parties, this writ petition is dismissed preserving the right of the petitioner to move the competent statutory authority for relief against Ext.P4, however, ordering that the impugned order will not be enforced against the petitioner for a period of three weeks from now. WPC26609/09 -: 2 :- It is clarified that this judgment will not stand in the way of the appellate/revisional authority passing appropriate interlocutory orders in accordance with law as it may deem fit. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/290909