c^'^ll ^w^ [(:. sQvs'n C^-^S^/- 7 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (Sl No. ^3^) /2010 PBTITIONERS ^ 1. Vineet kumar S/o Roshan Saloman aged Years, Upper Govt. TP^^. ^\''r^j.?-" ^ ^^ \<y\ ^.^-w ^ / ^*".,^:"" '^/ ^" ^'' ^^..^..;.^,^^. 1 ^^^w-y^ i %A^ ' A^ /f' Saloman Kumar about 51 Division Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary school Dharashiv, Block - Nawagarh, Distt. Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) Bhisham Prasad Rathore S/o Chhote Lal Rathore aged about 50 Years Head Master, Govt. Primary school Siwni Block - Nawagarh, Distt. Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 3. Gand Singh Koushik S/o Guna Ram Koushik aged about 50 Years ,Upper Division Teacher Govt. Middle school Parsada Block - Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) .4. Sanat Kumar Rathore S/o Kawal Prasad Rathore aged about 50 Years ,Upper Division Teacher Govt. Middle school Amruwa Block - Bamhnidih, Distt. Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 5. Indrabhushan Patle S/o Sitaram Patle aged about 59 Years, Lecturer, Govt. Multipurpose Higher Secondary school Janjgir No.2 , Block - Nawagarh, Distt. Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) a.e^^^^^^^^'^^,^^^^;1^,,^!.*^^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS: ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) /I. The District Education Offlcer, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Z-] HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Sjnate Bench: Hon*ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava. J. PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS wrar pErmoN ui WRIT PETITION (Sl N0.3339/2010 Vineet Kumar Saloman and Others Versus State of Chhattisgarh and Another IOFWDIA Present: - Shri Ashwani Shukla, counsel for the petitionen. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel Lawyerfor the State. ORALORDER (Passed on 09th July, 2010) The petitioners were initialty appointed as Deputy Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs.150/-. Afker completion of their probation period, they were granted regular pay scale of Rs.169-300/-. 2 . Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the tesue invoh/ed in the case is as to whether the petitioners are entitled to regulw pay scate with effect from the date of initial appointment or after comptetion of probation period. 3. The issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Adminjstrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A.No.2745/89 (Madfiukant Yadu and 56 Others v. State ofM.P. & others), wherein jt was held that the simitarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scate with effect from the date of injtjal appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'bJe Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'bto Supreme Court upholdir^ the decisfon of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachere are entitled to regular pay scate from the date of initial appointment. .^ •3& 9 4. Learned counset appearing for ttie petitioners ftirther sukwnMs ttiat this Court, white considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & Others v. State of ChhaMsgarh & Others, W.P.(S).No.4725/2006. by order dated 01-09-2006. altowed the petitioners to make a representation within a period of ten days. raising all the grievances. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are granted literty to make a representation raising all their grievances in Bght of the aforestated judgment and the drcular dated 13-01-2009 (Annexure P-2) and in tum, the concemed respondent is directed to decide e representations. jf any, in awordance with law, on ite owi merits, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, subject to verNication <rf the facts. 6. In view of the foregoing, this petitfon is disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Tumane