IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20797 of 2011 Ram Nandan Yadav @ Lorik Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 18-07-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the bail bonds of the petitioner was cancelled by the learned court below on 13.04.2011 but as a matter of fact, on the aforesaid date, the petitioner was present in the court but one Additional Public Prosecutor who was conducting this case, disclosed this fact that there was no witness on behalf of the prosecution and having learnt the aforesaid fact, the petitioner left the court and subsequently, another Public Prosecutor, filed attendance of witness before the court resulting cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. In support of this contention, he drew my attention towards Annexures-2 & 3 of the petition. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Ram Nandan Yadav @ Lorik Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Upahara P.S. Case No. 20 of 2007 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 115 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No.- V), Aurangabad. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)