" HIGH COURT OF Cm‘IATTISGARH AT 3IWPUR Writ Petition Q) No. 4251‘ of2008 , y , 7 PR ETITIONE Siddha Ram Ratre,'Sfo Shri Sewak Ram Rana, aged abaut 41 years, Assistant Teacher, Govarnment Primary » School, Naurangpur, Block Bemetara, District Durg (CG). VERSUS BE§P¢9NDENLE§ : 1. State of Chham‘sgarh Through Secretary; Exiucatioa a; Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. District Education Officer: Burg: Distt. Dnrg (CG). ' 3. Biock Education Offlccr Bemeiara, District Dsir'g (CG). (WRIT PE'I‘I‘I‘ION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF ‘I‘I‘IE CONSTITUTION OF INBIA) LSB: Hon’b’lc Mr. Satisl: K. Agnihotrk J.) I)resent : Shri Anil Moury& Advocate far the petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Fancl Lawyer for the State/respondcms. n...“ ORAL ORDER (Passeai en 4m day ofAugust, 2908) 1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. Learned counsel appean'ng for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submits that the fact and question of law involved Vin the present Writ Petition are the same to thatof in Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and anotherv{2006(ll) MEIR-(396}, which has been dieposedjof‘v’ide’ order dated 03.04.200o. In subsequent cases: Le. Writ Petition (S) No. 4130 of 2005 b) (Gopesh Kumar Verma Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh and another)- and other connected matters, decided hy this Court on 15.12.2006; pursuant to the memo dated 28.0}. .1995, issued by the Secretary; Boaid of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclawreof the Basic Training Institute i.e. B.’I’.I. has been changed and renamedas Diyloma in Education i;e. D;Ed. Accordingly, the Dhd Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S) No. 4130 of2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh and another) (Supra). Eé ‘ 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order‘passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. Municipal Corpomtion; Burg and another (Supra), subjectto verification of the &¢ts asto whether the petitioner has acquirad B.T.I. Examination (Bertificaw on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.4998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments er not. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri ' Jildge