IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 9499 of 2008. Decided on: 18 th December, 2010. Aman Kumar. …Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No ________________________________________________________ __ For the petitioner. : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for the respondents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner’s father died on 14.02.2002. His case was considered for compassionate appointment as per the norms, i.e., Annexure R-1, paragraph-17.3.1. He has been offered appointment on daily wage basis. A bare perusal of the scheme makes it abundantly clear that as far as compassionate appointment to the wards of daily wage employees who died in harness is concerned, it should be provided only on daily wage basis. Consequently, there is no illegality in the action of the respondents, whereby the petitioner has been offered appointment on daily wage basis. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. However, it is made clear that the case of petitioner for regularization shall be considered in accordance with law as and when he completes the requisite number of years. No costs. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. no (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 18, 2010. (bhupender)