IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.24286 -M of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 18, 2011 SANDEEP & ANR. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Sanjeev Sheokand, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. SS Nara, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. RK Sachdeva, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 This petition has been filed under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for quashing of FIR No.21 dated 14.3.2008 under Sections 323, 324, 452, 506, 34, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Behal, District Bhiwani (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2), attested on 29.7.2011. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that in regard to an incident, respondent No.2/injured, lodged the FIR. With the intervention of respectables, the disputes have been settled. The parties have entered into compromise (Annexure P- 2) and respondent No.2 has sworn affidavit dated 29.7.2011 (Annexure P-3). Criminal Misc. No.24286 -M of 2011 (O&M) 2 3 Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has endorsed the fact that respondent No.2, indeed, has sworn affidavit (Annexure P-3), in evidence to the fact that the disputes have been settled by way of compromise (Annexure P-2). 4 Learned counsel for the respondent-State contends that because the disputes have been settled by way of compromise, the State would have no objection to the quashing of the FIR. 5 Considering the nature of offences, the fact that respondent No.2 is not ready to prosecute the petitioners and in the interest of peace and harmony, this petition is allowed. 6 FIR No.21 dated 14.3.2008 under Sections 323, 324, 452, 506, 34, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Behal, District Bhiwani (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings, are hereby quashed. August 18, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?