1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Application (caf) No. 2613 of 2011 (In First Appeal No. 388/02 [D]) W.C.L. ...Versus... Kawadu Mukunda Vidhbate & ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. Mehadia Advocate for appellant. Ms. Kirti Satpute for Respondents 1 to 3. Mr. Kadu, AGP, for Res. 4 & 5. … CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 17.11.2011. Heard. Counsel for respondents 1 to 3 submits that original respondent no.2 Sakhubai expired during the period when the appeal was decided. The appeal now stands dismissed. However, Registry of this Court has issued cheques in the names of all the respondents, namely respondents 1 to 3. Since respondent no.2 Sakhubai has expired, the cheque will have to be issued in favour of sons of Sakhubai and that is why this application has been made. Counsel for the appellant has no instruction on this. 2 However, in order to obviate the further proceedings and harassment to the legal heirs of deceased Sakhubai, I grant this application in terms of its prayer clauses. The cheque in relation to deceased respondent no.2 Sakhubai Maroti Warate be issued in the name of applicants/legal heirs of deceased respondent no.2. C.A. disposed of. Judge /TA/