^-^ COURT OF CHHATTISGARH.AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 6712 of2006 Smt. Neeli Chaiihan W/o Shri Punit Ram Chauhan. Aged about 39 years, R/o SAunde, Kaiiapaii Grain Panchayat, Basna Block, Distt: Mahasamund, C.G. State. VERSUS 1. State ofC.G. Thm : Secretam Panchayat Raj, DKS Bhawaii, Raipur, CG State. 2. District Collector, Mahasamuad District C.G. State. 3. Jaipad Panchayat, Through Executive Officer, Basna Block, Dist: Mahasamund, C.G. State. 4. Project OfBcer, liitegrated Child Developmeiit Scheme, Basna, Dist. Maliasamund, C.G. State. 5. Smt. Aaierica Bai, W/o Nand Kuaiar Salaande Village, Kanapaii Gram Paachayat, Basna Block, Mahasamund (CG) WRIT PETmON UNDER ARIICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPO^^>ENTS <>;] Present: Shri K.R.Nair, Advocate tor the petitioner. Shri U.N.S.Deo, Govemment Advocate for ifae State/ respoadent No. l,2and4. None for respondeut No. 3 aiid 5. 4. (Passed on 25m day of March, 2008) Despite service ofnotice, none appears for respondent No. 3 and 5. The matter is taken uo for consideration withthe consent ofthe parties. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that fhe appointment of fhe respondent No. 5 on fhe post of Angan Badi worker for villase Sakunde, Gram Panehayat Kanapali, Development Block Basna, District Mahasamimd, is contrary to the Angan Badi scheme and law. Be that as it may, flie disputed question of facts are mvolved in fhis matter. Interest ofiustice wouldbe subserved, iffhe present disputes are referred to the District Collector for decision after providing opportuaity of hearins to the concemed parties. Leamed counsel for the parties have no objection. Accordinslv, the matter is referred back to the Collector, Mahasamund, for adjudication in accordance with law on its own merit, expeditiously. In visw ofthe above. the oetition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Amit Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge