^>-^: HjGHCOURT^FCHHATTSSGARH:BILASPUR Coram: Hon'bte Shn' T.P.Shanma Hon'ble'Shri RJ-.Jhanwar, JJ. APPELLANT/ APPLICANT RESPONDENT/ NON-APPLICANT F.A.fMl.No.60/2009 Smt. Gurusikha Vaishnav, W/o Amit Vaishnav, aged about 26 years, Resident of C/o Shri Pawna Kumar Sadhu, '101, -Manshi Palace, Opposite Futi Kothi, Dhar Road,, Distt. Indore (M.P.) Versus Amit Vaishnav, S/o Lakhandas Vaishnav, aged about 29 years, R/o Kamal Kunj, Pandari Tarai, Opposite Saliu Ara Mill, Past Pandari, P.S. Civil Line, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) FIRST APPEAL UNDERSECTION 19 OF THE FAMILYCOURTS ACT, 1984 ^" Present: Shri C.R. Sahu, counsel for the appellant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 10.09.2009) Heard on I.A.No. 1 for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 2. Counsel for the appellant submits that this appeal. has been preferred after 12 days of its limitation. 3. Application under Order 9 Rule 13 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the appellant has been dismissed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur vide order dated 15.06.2009, 4. Counsel for the appellant frankly submits that he seeks to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file an application for setting the order passed ex parfe before the Fainily Court. 5. Accordingly, I.A.No.Ol is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. , 6. In view of the above, this appeal'is dismissed as withdrawn. The appellant may file an appropriate application for setting the order passed ex parte against the appellant before the FamUy Court, Raipur. ;B -''» No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge Sd/- R.L. Jhaiiwar Judge