[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.482 OF 2008 IN APPEAL NO.184 OF 2008 Shakil Ahmed Jamaluddin Rognagar ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Shailesh Kantharia advocate for applicant Mr.Rajesh More A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : MAY 05, 2008 DATE : MAY 05, 2008 DATE : MAY 05, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant has been convicted. The maximum sentence of imprisonment imposed on the applicant is three years. The applicant is now seeking bail. 3. The learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the applicant was on bail during the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. The sentence imposed on the applicant is [-2-] three years and the appeal preferred by the applicant is not likely to be heard within the said period. This statement is not controverted by the prosecution. 4. Looking to the above facts, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 5. The applicant-Shakil Ahmed Jamaluddin Rognagar to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rs.twenty thousand only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount during the pendency of the appeal. The applicant to report to Samtanagar police station, Thane once in a week till the disposal of the appeal. 6. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]