1 ndm 56 chs.1708.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1708 OF 2010 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2373 OF 2007 Pavanraj Bachrajji Mehta Vs. Yagnam Pulverizer Pvt. Ltd. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Bharat Joshi for the Plaintiff. Mr. Mohan A. Dharamraj for the Defendant. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 14 th January, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiff in support of the chamber summons and the learned counsel appearing for the Defendant in support of the chamber summons. 2 In view of averments made in affidavit in support, chamber summons deserves to be made absolute. Accordingly, chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) [ A.S.OKA, J ]