^~ MISH COURT OFCHHATTIS^ARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (5) Mo. 3565 of 2008 Pstitsoriar ; Verais Rs^poncf&nts 1. 2. 3. 4. Ludhak Ram Lahre ^L.&. Lahi^), aged obout 58 years, son of Late Bhuwantal Uxlhre, bahre, presentty working as - (ASLR-) Sohayak Adhtkshak, Naaii Branch. Mungeli, R.B.C. 4-1, Tah. Mun9eli, DisU. BSIaspur (C6) R/o. Naw Taj Moszid, Talcgwra, Bt'Saspur (C6) State of Chhcttssgar-h, through the Secretsry, Deparlroent of Revenue, Duu Kalyiri Singh Bhawan, Raj'pur- (CS) Jhe Under Secretary DepTT of Rewnue Day t&xty'an Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C6) Collector, Disn. Bitaspur (C©) Hw^iwardhon Singh, presently workiri9 as Asst Sup&rintenderst Land Record, Patwari PrQshotsjam Shala, BiSaspur (C^) WRTT PFHTION UN&Eft ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTnVTZON OF INDIA Sirigte Bench : Wor.'ble Mr. Satish K. Agn»hotri. J. Shri H. S. Patei, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri ya^iwint Singh Thakur, &^?uty AdvGcate ^ajwr^at for the re^ond&nts No.l to 3. ORALOROER (Poflsecj on -Hiis 9th day of Jujy, 2008) i. VVith the conssnt of Seamed counsfel Gppearin9 for the partie^, tha petitbn ss heard finaliy. -2- 2- Leam&cS counsel appeoring for ths {^titioner subifiit^ thot •H-se petition&r does not want to press this petition on rrisrits, at +his stage. How&v&r, the conc&m&ci authoriti&s moy be direct&d to consid&r and decide the repr&sentQtion dated 3.7.2008 (Arsn&xure P/6), pending before -Hie S&cr&taty, Reversua, Stat& of <%hattisgarh, sn accorcksnce with law, within -Hie pr&scribad time. 3. Shri Yashwisnt Singh Thakur, learn&d b^uty Advocote ^erseraS, appeoring for Ifis r-espond&nts No.l to 3/State submsts +hot th& pencling repressntotion (Anrsaxure P/6) ^iall be conssdared and d&cided by the conc&rn&d au+hority, sn <3ccordanc& with bw, on its own merits, wsthin a persod of three we&ks from the date of recespt of a copy of this ord&r< 4. Tn vi&w of the foregoing, r»G1tJhing surviv&s in the matt&r. 5- Accordingly, the p&tstion stands dis^os&d of. No ordar asto costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ThGkur