IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 134 OF 2010 IN STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 1418 OF 2010 V.P.K URBAN COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD REP. BY LEGAL OFFICER MS. RATNA S. AMONKAR ... Applicant Versus MRS. NIRMALA A. NAIK AND ANR., ... Respondents Shri D. Pangam, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri C. A. Ferreira, Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.2. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 2nd August, 2010 P.C.:- Heard Shri D. Pangam, learned Counsel on behalf of the Applicant/Complainant. Notice to Respondent No.1/Accused is not returned. The subject cheque was for a sum of Rs.60,000/-. The Complainant's witness admitted that the overdue amount was only Rs.18,762/-. In other words, the cheque was for an amount which was more than the amount due to the Complainant. In view of the principle laid down in the case of Laxmikant D. Naik Karmali v. Santosh V. Naik(2006(2)DCR(Cri) 830), no case is made out for grant of Special Leave to Appeal. Application dismissed. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.