IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 1ST APRIL 2011 / 11TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 5258 of 2011(F) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. PARAMESWARAN K.K., S/O.KORAN, AGED 63 YEARS, (RETIRED INSPECTOR, KSRTC., TRICHUR DEPOT.) KANJANGATTU HOUSE, PORKULAM P.O., PAZHANJI, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. C.K.PRAKASAN, S/O.C.R.KUNJUNNI, AGED 65 YEARS, (RETIRED INSPECTOR, KSRTC., THRISSUR DEPOT)., CHULLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, VALAPPAI JUNCTION, MULAMKKUNNATHUKAVU, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAWAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAWAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THRISSUR.PIN- 680 001 R1 TO R3 BY ADV.SRI.V.V.NANDA GOPAL NAMBIAR, SC FOR KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ---------------------------- W.P.(C)No.5258 of 2011 ---------------------------- Dated 1st April, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioners retired from the service of the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation as Inspectors respectively on 30.11.2001 and 31.8.2001. They are aggrieved by the non-implementation of Ext.P3 order No. PL-10/00318/06 dated 20.6.2006 and the consequential non- disbursement of the arrears of pay and pension. For the redressal of the aforesaid grievance the petitioners have already approached the second respondent by filing Ext.P4 representation. It is the failure on the part of the second respondent to consider Ext.P4 representation in the light of Ext.P3 that made the petitioners to move this Court. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the learned standing counsel for the respondents. Raising their grievances regarding the non-implementation of Ext.P3 and consequential failure to disburse the benefits flowing from Ext.P3 the petitioners have already approached the second respondent. through Ext.P4 representation dated 15.6.2010 and it is still pending before the second respondent. In the said circumstances, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions raised by the petitioners in this writ petition and also in Ext.P4 representation, this writ WP(C).No.5258/2011 2 petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS // true copy // P.S. to Judge