1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.3058 OF 2009 Mukesh Bansilal Jhaveri ..Applicant v/s. The State and Ors. ..Respondents. Shri Niranjan Mundargi, adv. For the applicant. Smt. G.P.Mulekar, APP for the R.No.1/State. Shri I.A.Bagaria, adv. For the R.Nos.2 and 3. WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.4254 OF 2009 The State ...Applicant. v. Sheela Sunil Goenka and Anr. ...Respondents. Smt.G.P.Mulekar, APP For the Applicant/State. Mr.I.A.Bagaria, adv. For the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 28, 2011. P.C. 1 First application is filed by the original complainant for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the respondent nos.2 and 3 in crime no.127 of 2009 registered at MRA Marg Police Station under Sections 380, 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 r/w section 120B of the I.P.C. Second application is filed by the State for the same purpose. 2 The learned APP, on written report from the Senior Police 2 Inspector Economic Offences Wing, states that after investigation, police found that no criminal case is made out and accordingly B Summary has been filed. In view of this, the State does not want to press the application, therefore, criminal application no.4254 of 2009 stands disposed off as not pressed. 3 The learned counsel for the applicant/complainant in Criminal Application No.3058 of 2009 states that the applicant has also filed writ petition, which is pending before the Division Bench for directions for appropriate investigation. In view of the above referred B Summary from the Investigating Officer and pendency of the writ petition, the learned counsel seeks to withdraw this application with liberty to file fresh application, if need be, after directions, which may be given by the Division Bench in the writ petition. 4 Therefore, Criminal Application No.3058 of 2009 stands disposed off as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)