WP(C) No.6927/2009 Page 1 of 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) NO. 6927/2009 % Date of Decision : 24.03.2009 OM PRAKASH MISRA …. Petitioner Through : Petitioner in person. Versus CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR M/S HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPORATION LTD. …. Respondent Through : Mr. Ratan K. Singh, Advocate HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI 1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NO V. K. SHALI, J.(Oral) * 1. It is 4.05 PM when the order is about to be dictated in the open Court in the presence of the petitioner as well Mr. Ratan K. Singh learned counsel for the respondent/management, the petitioner has stated that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition as it involves disputed question of facts and he may be permitted to file a suit in the appropriate Court for the adjudication of his grievance challenging the order of acceptance of resignation on the ground that at WP(C) No.6927/2009 Page 2 of 2 the time when the resignation was given by him, he was not in a sound state of mind. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent/management though asked as to whether he would have any objection, in case, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a suit, he refrained from making any submissions. 3. In view of the statement made by the petitioner, he is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a suit in appropriate forum. However, this does not preclude the respondent/management to raise any objection including with regard to the question of limitation. 4. With these observations, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. MARCH 24, 2009 V.K. SHALI, J. KP