IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.11990 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 12, 2010. Puneet Aggarwal .....Petitioner versus Food Corporation of India and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Bimal Maini, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The father of the petitioner joined as AG-III (PP) with the Food Corporation of India. He was dismissed from service on 9.10.1998 after a departmental enquiry. The dismissal order was however set-aside by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.15912 of 2002 decided on 15.9.2003, with liberty to the respondents to proceed afresh against the petitioner's father from the stage of submission of the enquiry report. The respondents again dismissed the father of the petitioner from service vide order dated 30.11.2007 and the departmental appeal preferred by him was also rejected on 12.5.2008. No further challenge was made to these orders till the father of the petitioner unfortunately passed away on 23.2.2010. The petitioner now seeks a direction to the respondents to grant various services benefits C.W.P.No .11990 of 2010 2 admissible to his deceased-father like C.P.F., Leave Encashment, Gratuity, Reimbursement of Medical Bill, Pay Revision arrears, pension etc. alongwith interest. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length and perused the records. In my considered view, except those monetary benefits like C.P.F., based upon the contribution made by the deceased-employee, other monetary benefits might not be admissible unless the Rules/Policies of the respondents Corporation so provide expressly. Be that as it may, the petitioner has already represented the authorities in this regard on 22.4.2010 and 31.10.2009 (Annexures P-4 to P-6), but there is no response to these representation. In these circumstances, however without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2 to 4 to consider the claim of the service benefits of deceased-father of the petitioner and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order, within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 12, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE