1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER 1. S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.1008/2009. The Union of India. VERSUS Mohd.Rihan Ansari. 2. S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.1011/2009. The Union of India. VERSUS Smt.Ram Katori. 3. S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.623/2009. The Union of India. VERSUS Smt.Parbati Devi & Others. 4. S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.624/2009. The Union of India. VERSUS Shri Gopal Singh & Anr. 5. S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.1010/2009. The Union of India. VERSUS Laxmi Narain & Anr. 6. S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.1012/2009. The Union of India. VERSUS Smt.Munni Devi & Ors. 7. S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.1013/2009. The Union of India. VERSUS Smt.Maya Meena & Ors. 25.02.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Ashish Chauhan, for the appellant. Mr.Mahendra Shandilya, for the respondent. ***** The parties are present in person. They have filed an application for compromise which is ordered to be registered. This is an appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The marriage of the parties took place in the month of February, 1997 and in June, 1997, the parties separated as there were allegations of cruelty lodged by the appellant against the respondent. In the year 2000, an application under Section 13 2 of the Hindu Marriage Act for dissolution of marriage came to be filed by the wife-appellant which came to be dismissed by the learned trial court vide judgment dated 24.07.2002, against which the present appeal has been filed. It is common ground between the parties that since 1997, both the parties have been living separately. During the course of hearing of this appeal, efforts were made for reconciliation. However, both the parties were of the view that reconciliation between the parties is not possible. Alternatively, both the parties are agreeable for the dissolution of the marriage. An application has been filed jointly by the parties today supported by the affidavits of both the parties i.e., the appellant-wife as well as the respondent- husband. The parties have been identified by their respective counsel. In view of the application submitted today, this appeal is disposed of, as prayed. The marriage between the parties stands dissolved, as prayed. The respondent-husband shall pay to the appellant, the amount of maintenance, as referred to in para 8 in accordance with the schedule mentioned therein, as has been agreed by the respondent-husband. The appeal accordingly stands disposed of in the light of the application for compromise. The decree in 3 terms of the compromise be prepared. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.