C.O.C.P.No.229 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.O.C.P.No.229 of 2009 Date of Decision:-13.8.2009 Harjinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus Shive Kumar, SSP Barnala. ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.Suresh Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.M.C.Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): Vide order dated 15.1.2008 passed by this Court in CRM No.981-M of 2008, the respondent was directed to look into the representation filed by the petitioner and to dispose of the same by passing a speaking order expeditiously and preferably within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. The grievance of the petitioner in this petition is that the aforesaid order passed by this Court was not complied with. In response to the show cause notice issued by this Court, reply by way of short affidavit of Shive Kumar, IPS, SSP, Barnala has been filed. Alongwith this reply, reports dated 16.5.2009 and 27.8.2008 have been attached which have been submitted after looking into the representation of the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has vehemently argued that the respondent is guilty of committing the C.O.C.P.No.229 of 2009 2 contempt of this Court as he was supposed to look into the representation of the petitioner within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order of this Court i.e. upto 15.4.2009. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. While disposing of CRM No.981-M of 2008, this Court had expected that the representation of the petitioner shall be looked into and disposed of expeditiously. In any case, compliance of the order of this Court has been made. In view of the aforesaid, I am not inclined to proceed further with this petition. Rule discharged. 13.8.2009 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) AS Judge