IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2008 / 14TH JYAISHTA 1930 WA.No. 902 of 2008() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.19804/2007 Dated 23/11/2007 .................... APPELLANT: 2ND RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------------------- RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, URBAN BANK'S DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.JACOB VARGHESE (SR.) SRI.VIVEK VARGHESE SMT.VIDYA GOPINATH SRI.P.J.VINOD JOSEPH RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER/IST RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. THE CHAIRMAN, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOOTHEDAM CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK (UL) LTD.NO.M 653, P.O.KARAPPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.D.SOMASUNDARAM - R.1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER - R2 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/06/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss J.B.Koshy & P.N.Ravindran, JJ. ===================== W.A.No.902 of 2008 ===================== Dated this the 4th day of June, 2008. JUDGMENT Koshy,J. Ext.A5 impugned judgment was quashed and the appellant - second respondent Bank was directed to take a decision denovo. It is for the appellant itself to take a decision. It is also submitted that by order dated 4.4.2008, after considering the case of the first respondent, the appellant again rejected the application filed by him. In these circumstances, we are of the view that the appeal has become infructuous and the same is dismissed. J.B.Koshy, Judge. P.N.Ravindran, Judge. ess 5/6