IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH JANUARY 2009 / 24TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 1486 of 2009(B) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SAI KRISHNAN,S/O.LATE VELAYUDHAN,AGED 42 YEARS,MOOLAYIL HOUSE, KALATHODU P.O. THRISSUR, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT UNITY ROAD, KURIACHIRA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR SMT.SUDHADEVI, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.1486 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 14th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T Prayer in this writ petition is for a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 application made by the petitioner by invoking the provisions of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order. Referring to Exts.P3 to P5, the learned counsel also submits that enquiry in pursuance to Ext.P1 has been conducted and a report has been submitted before the 2nd respondent. It is stated that despite all these, orders have not been passed. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P2 application has been received and is pending, the 2nd respondent is directed to pass orders thereon taking into account the law laid down by this Court in Jayakrishnan v. District Collector and Others (2008(4) KHC 514). This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg