IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30919 of 2008 SANJAY SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 26.9.2008 Heard. The petitioner is not named in the FIR of a case under Section 302 etc IPC and 27 of the Arms Act and was subsequently named by the informant in his further statement. The simple contention is that if at all the petitioner participation was known to the informant and the petitioner was seen by him he ought to have named the petitioner in the FIR. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M. Masaurhi, Patna in Pipra P.S.Case no.5 of 2000. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )