IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-11977 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 27, 2010 Maninderjit Kaur .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.S.S.Siao, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondent nos.3 and 4 not to harass petitioner at the instance of respondent nos.5 to 10. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioner will be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 2.4.2010, Annexure P1, already made to him by the petitioner. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, i.e.,Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 2.4.2010, Annexure P1, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioner. 27.4.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge