..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2418 OF 2008 Datta Shankar Mhatre. ..Applicant. Versus Tukaram Punjaji Padle & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr.V.V.Purwant, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.K.S.Patil, Adv. for orig.complainant. Mr.S.R.Shinde, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 1st October, 2008. DATED : 1st October, 2008. DATED : 1st October, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant-orig.accused No.3, the learned Advocate for respondent No.1-orig.complainant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant-orig.accused No.3 is seeking quashing of FIR i.e. C.R.No.I-101 of 2008 of Dayghar police station. The said case is under Sections 143, 447 of Indian Penal Code and under Sections 37(3), 135 of Bombay Police Act. 3. The learned Advocate for the complainant states ..(2).. that the complainant does not wish to pursue this FIR in respect of any of the accused and the FIR may be quashed. 4. The complainant has filed affidavit wherein it is stated that he has no objection to the said FIR dated 31.5.2008 lodged with Dayghar police station being quashed. 5. Looking to the above facts, in my opinion no purpose would be achieved by continuing with the prosecution in the said case. In order to maintain peace and harmony between the parties, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the FIR. Hence, FIR relating to C.R. No.I-101 of 2008 of Dayghar police station is quashed in respect of all the accused persons. 6. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)