t.^ (S> <TD .^ .^^ ;^v ^fi .^ ^•^ ^y ...-' ^6'.&.-•" ^?/%^< \ ^ % ^k^f 1^» ^/ r^-"--' . " W. P. (S) No. %^0 /2009 Premadevi Pathak W/o Kaushal Kishor Pathak, Age about 50 years, R/o Gum Govind SinghNo.36, Parpanaka, Jagdalpur (C.G.) State ofChhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Bakward Class Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) The Commissioner, Tribal Development Raipur (C.G.) The Secretary, Mata Rukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tah. & District-Jagdalpur(C.G) COURT OF CHHATTiSOARH : WR§T,PETiTJONiSlNO,_51SOQE20C9- PETITIGNER Prsmadevi Psthak RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ petitlon under Article 22S ofths Constitution of India) Slngle Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnlhotri, J. Present:» Shri Lav Sharma, counsei for the petitioner. Ms. Smita Ghal, Panei Lawyerfor the State. GRDER(ORAL) (Passed on thls 18th day of September, 2009) 1. Wlth the consent of learned counse! appeanng for the partles, the petltlon is heard flnaily. 2. Learned counse! appearlng for the petitloner submits that the instant petjtlor§ Is squareiy covered by the decislon of thls Court rendered in Srnt A. LaSS v. of Chhattisgarh & Others1, thus the petltioner mav be Dermitced to make a reDresentatlon to decide her case In the iight of afore-stated decislon, subject to verlfication asto whether the respondent No.3 jnstitute is a Government aided schooi and the petitioner Is a teacher within the sanctioned strength. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same wiil be considered and declded, in accordance wlth law, within a perlod of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. !n vlew of foregolng, according to the learned counse! appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petitlon is.disposed of. Tumane Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ' 2007(1)8u 265