1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.171 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3015 OF 2002 The State of Maharashtra ..Appellant V/s. T.K.Pagar & ors ..Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.172 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3017 OF 2002 The State of Maharashtra ..Appellant V/s. T.A.Pagar & ors ..Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.173 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3021 OF 2002 The State of Maharashtra ..Appellant V/s. N.P.Pagar ..Respondent Smt.V.S.Mhaispurkar, Assistant Government Pleader, for the State CORAM : C. L. PANGARKAR, J. DATE : 9TH FEBRUARY, 2010 2 P.C. . Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader, for the State. 2. These First Appeals are preferred by the State of Maharashtra against the Award passed by the Reference Court in Land Acquisition Reference Nos.34 to 37. The references were made at the instance of the claimants whose lands were acquired. 3. The learned Judge of the Reference Court upon consideration of the evidence found that the Land Acquisition Officer had not granted inadequate compensation i.e. he found that the compensation granted was in fact adequate. However, the learned Judge found as a fact that the Land Acquisition Officer had not awarded the component which was required to be awarded. The learned Judge of the Reference Court only awarded component. 3 In fact, the State of Maharashtra should not have preferred an Appeal. The learned Judge has not committed any error while awarding component. There is, therefore, no substance in these First Appeals which are accordingly dismissed. 4. In view of the dismissal of these First Appeals, Civil Applications do not survive and same are accordingly disposed of. (C.L.PANGARKAR, J.)