IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Crl. Misc. No. M-8410 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:23.03.2011 Mohinder Kaur .....Petitioner Vs. The State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of FIR as well as charge. Since the remedy of revision is there and the petitioner has not availed the remedy of revision, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail the alternative remedy available under law. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that delay in filing of the revision be condoned. No such direction can be issued, however, the petitioner is at liberty to move application for condonation of delay before the Court where he would avail the alternative remedy. March 23, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE