[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.1272 OF 2007 1. Sudam M.Pawali 2. Chetan Vasant Pawali Both r/o Khalache Takane Tal.Karjat Dist.Raigad ..Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.P.P.Runwal Advocate for Applicants Mr.S.S.Pednekar A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : APRIL 13, 2007 DATE : APRIL 13, 2007 DATE : APRIL 13, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.25 of 2007 of Karjat Police Station. The said case is mainly under Section 326 of IPC. 3. There are cross cases. C.R.No.24 of 2007 has been filed by co-accused of the present applicants. The said C.R. is first in point of time. Thereafter, C.R.No.25 of 2007 i.e. present C.R. [-2-] in which the applicants are involved, has been registered. Though the prosecution case is that applicants are involved under Section 326 of IPC, the learned A.P.P. states that injury certificates show that all the injured persons have suffered simple injuries. Thus, offence under Section 326 of IPC, is not made out. In this view of the matter, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants. 4. In the event of arrest, each of the applicants to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rs.twenty thousand only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount in C.R.No.25 of 2007 of Karjat Police Station. The applicant shall report to the concerned Police Station, once in a week till the conclusion of trial. 5. Application is disposed of. [Smt. V.K.Tahilramani, J.]