BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Third day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.17105 of 2011 1 VELMUTHU 2 SEKAR ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 & 2 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELAPALAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DIST IN CR.NO. 877 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.M.A.JINNAH Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as A-1 and A-2 in Crime No.877 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, for the offence under Sections 294(b), 147, 148, 323, 506(ii) I.P.C., and Section 4 of TNPPDL Act. The petitioners were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 12.12.2011. They have come forward with this petition seeking bail. 2. Heard Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the co-accused were granted bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the petitioners have been implicated in this case on the allegation that the petitioners along with some other accused pelted stones on the windows of a Mini Bus and caused damage. He would further submit that if for any reason, the petitioners are released on bail, suitable conditions may be imposed. 5. I have considered the above submissions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6. Considering the submissions made by both sides, I could see that the petitioners are said to have caused damage to the windows of a Mini bus and they have been in judicial custody from 12.12.2011 and the co-accused had already been released on bail. Considering the above said facts, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners, but with stringent conditions. 7. In the result, this petition is ordered and bail is granted to the petitioners on the following conditions: - (i) The Petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Tirunelveli; (ii) The Petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.500/-(Rupees Five Hundred Only) to the credit of Crime No.877 of 2011 before the learned Magistrate concerned; and (iii) The petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. sd/- 23/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V TIRUNELVELI 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELAPALAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DIST 5 THE SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI +1. CC to M/S.S.M.A.JINNAH Advocate SR.No.45546 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17105 of 2011 Date :23/12/2011 SMA/23.12.2011/7C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/