IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1934 of 2008 (M/S) Som Singh Chauhan, Son of Ikmal Singh Chauhan, Resident of Sitapur Jwalapur, Tehsil and District Haridwar. (Holding the Power of Attorney of late Smt. Lata Rani wife of Late Prem Kumar Resident of Mohalla Chaklan Jwalapur, Tehsil and District Haridwar and others. ....Petitioners Vs Nagar Palika Samiti, Haridwar through its Executive Officer. ......Respondent Sri Vikas Pandey, Advocate present for the petitioners. Sri Pankaj Miglani, Advocate present for the respondent. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard Sri Vikas Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel for the respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner made a prayer that he is not pressing the second prayer of the writ petition. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners has sought to issue a direction to the learned Pargana Adhikari to dispose of the matter in the light of the compromise held between the parties on 18- 6-2004 after verifying the same. It is a disputed question of fact whether the parties have entered into compromise or not. The petitioners may adduce their evidence of the compromise if any in his favour before the learned Pargana Adhikari/ Assistant Collector concerned. 2 Since the petitioner is not assailing the remand order passed by the Additional Chief Revenue Commissioner in Revision No.55 of 2002-2003. Learned Assistant Collector is directed to decide the proceeding expeditiously as early as possible after hearing both the parties on merit. With the said observation, the writ petition is dismissed in limine. (B.S. Verma,J) 24-10-2008 M.K.