-:- 1 -:- Writ Petition No.5531 of 2011. 21.11.2011 :- Shri Vijay Assudani, learned counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Mini Ravindran, learned Deputy Govt. Advocate for the Respondents/State. With consent, heard finally. O R D E R BY this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought quashment of the orders [Annexures-P/5 and P/6] and the RRC dated 01.07.2011 [Annexure-P/9]. [2] During the course of the arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner made grievance only in respect of the RRC [Annexure-P/9] issued by the fourth Respondent – Tehsildar (Recovery), Mhow, District Indore for recovery of Rs.26,21,020-00 from the petitioner. [3] It is not in dispute that the said amount has not been quantified by any competent independent authority other than the officer of the Respondents as yet and the matter -:- 2 -:- regarding appointment of Arbitrator to resolve and to decide the disputes between the parties is pending consideration. [4] In view of the aforesaid fact that the quantification of the amount sought to be recovered from the petitioner has not been made by any independent competent authority, in our considered view in view of the law laid down by a Full Bench of this Court in B.B.Verma and others v/s State of M.P. and another [2007 (4) MPLJ 610], the impugned RRC issued by the fourth Respondent is not sustainable. [5] In the circumstances, the RRC impugned in this petition is quashed, however, with liberty to the Respondents to take appropriate steps for recovery of the amount, if any, from the petitioner, in accordance with law. [6] With the aforesaid liberty, the petition stands disposed of. [ Shantanu Kemkar ] [ Prakash Shrivastava ] JUDGE JUDGE (AKS)