C-482 No. 112 of 2008 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. By way of this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioners have challenged the impugned summoning order dated 07.12.2007 as well as entire criminal proceedings of Case No. 3011 of 2007, Kishan Vs Teluram & others, under Sections 323, 452, 506 of I.P.C. pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent No. 2 filed a complaint before the Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee against the petitioners. After recording the statements of two witnesses under Section 202 of Cr.P.C. the learned Magistrate issued summoning order against the petitioners under the aforesaid sections, which is under challenge by way of this petition. Heard Sri Manish Arora, learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. Having considered the material available before me, I am of the view that there is no flagrant injustice and abuse of process of court in this case. I am not supposed to embark upon an enquiry as to whether the evidence in question is reliable or not or whether on the reasonable appreciation of it, accusation would be sustained or not. It is the function of the trial judge where the evidence is yet to come and the matter is to be decided finally. I do not find any illegality in the impugned summoning order passed by the learned Magistrate. I do not find any merit in this case at this stage. Accordingly, the petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed in-limine. (B.C.K., J.) 15.02.2008 ASWAL