AB 256/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K. MUSAHARY Heard Mr MU Mahmud, learned counsel for the accused petitioners. Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. PP, Assam who has produces the case diary. On perusal of the case diary I find no materials against the accused petitioners Nos.2 and 3, father-in-law and mother-in-law of the informant respectively. In view of the above, the interim bail order dated 28-1-2011 granted in favour o f the accused petitioners Nos.2 and 3, is made absolute on the same terms and co nditions. However, there are some materials against the accused petitioner No.1, husband o f the informant. He is presently posted at Gandhinagar, Gujrat and there is no c hance of absconding. In view of the above, it is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused petitioner No.1 Shri Shankar Das, in connection with Abhayapuri PS Case No.403/2 010 u/s 498(A) IPC, he shall be enlarged on bail of Rs.20,000/- with one local s urety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. However, he shall appear before the I.O. within seven days from today for recording his sta tement. It is also provided that the accused petitioner No.1, after his first ap pearance before the I.O. shall appear before him once in every fortnight for a p eriod of three months failing which this bail order shall stand cancelled. Furth er it is provided that he shall not leave the jurisdiction of Abhayapuri without prior permission of the O.C. concerned. The bail application stands disposed of.