1 3683.11 SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3683 OF 2011 Narendra Nathuram Pardeshi ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.N.N.Gavankar i/b Mr.Sharon Patole for Petitioner. Mr.J.P.Yagnik, A.P.P. for Respondents. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATED:- DECEMBER 22, 2011. P.C. 1. Learned A.P.P. on instructions states that the petitioner’s proposal for premature release was duly considered by the Appropriate Authority and eventually rejected on 15th January, 2011 which position was communicated to the petitioner. The rejection of the said proposal has been communicated by the petitioner. The petitioner if aggrieved by the said decision is free to challenge the same by way of appropriate proceedings. 2. Petition is disposed of with liberty as aforesaid. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)