y, @ - HIGH coun'r or cHHAmsaARH, nmpun w.p.(S) No.447o of 200': Vedu Ram sahu, aged about 61 yeaxs, s/o late Shri Ram Sahay Sahu — At present working as head Master, Govt. Middle School, Boida, Block Pali, Distt.Korba (C.G) PETITIONER /// Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattiegarh, thmugh the Secretaxy, Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantmlaya, Raipur, Distt. Raipur‘ (C.G). 2. The Secretary, General Administration Department, D.K.S.' Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G). 3. The Collector (Tribal Welfare), Korba (w) 4. Block development O$cer, Kobra (w) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2N OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri Jitendra Pali, counsel for the petitioner. Shn' Ku. Deepali Pandey, Panel lawyer for the State] respondents on advance copy. OR Al. ORDER 3mm. xuMAR smHA, J, (03.08.2007) Heard finally with the consent of the parties. The petitioner who is working as Headmaster, Government Middle School, Boida has challenged the validity of his transfer order dated 21.72007 (Annexuxe P- 1) whereby he has been transferred from Boida to Sinnina. Referring to the contents of Annexure P-2, learned counsel for the petiu'oner argues that the date of birth of the petitioner is \ 01.7.1946, according to which, he is to retire w.e.f. 30.6.2008. He refers to the transfer policy dt. 13.6.2007 (Annexure P‘3) and \submits that since less than one year is left for retirement of me \ w.p.[s) “c.4470 or 2007 pen’tioncr, therefore, according to Clause 7 of me said Policy hmed by the Government, the petitioner should not have been u‘ansferred. The contents of Class 7 of the Policy read as under: «7. mmwemem 1aémw€rwsw§na%ugfw# mmmnam$fna#mTmw manwwmewng we!” After going through the pention as also the contents of the Policy and after considering the date of superannuation of the petitioner, in the opinion of this Court, ends of justice would be sewed if the petitioner is directed to me a representation before the concerned authority invoking Clause 7 of the Policy mmed vide Annexure P-3. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner shall Ea a detailed representation before the concerned authority within a period of 3 weeks hem today alongwith a copy of this order and copy of writ petition raising his gievance and if such a representan'on is died, the'concerned authority shall dispose of the same as early as possible preferably within a period of 2 months hem the date of said representation. It is further directed that in the meanwhile, the pen'tioner shall not be relieved hem his present place of posting i.e., Boida and shall be allowed to continue there. With the above direction] observations this petition stands nnally disposed of. C.c. as er rules. p Sd/— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge