IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1412 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:08.03.2011 The Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Opposite Medical Store, Karnal . . .Petitioner Versus Ravinder Nath . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Namit Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Anil Malhotra, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) The petitioner is a Public Utility Service (Post Office), which has been ordered to vacate the demised premises by order of the Court below. On 28.2.2011, when the revision petition was listed for preliminary hearing, it was not pressed on merits, rather prayer was made to grant time to vacate the demised premises to find out an alternative accommodation, hence the revision petition on merits was dismissed and notice of motion was issued to the respondent for the purpose of grant of time. Pursuant to the notice of motion, learned counsel for the respondent has put in appearance. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a period of six months may be granted to vacate the demised premises, whereas learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that a period of at the most one month may be granted. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, a period of three months is granted to the petitioner, which is a Public Utility Service, to vacate the demised premises so that in the meantime they could arrange an alternative accommodation. This is however, subject to their filing of an undertaking by the Senior Superintendent of Post Office, Karnal, before the Rent Controller to vacate the demised premises on 8.6.2011. The petitioner shall also clear the arrears of rent, if any due, and shall keep on paying the rent of the ensuing months. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MARCH 08, 2011 JUDGE Vivek