1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 118 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 23 OF 2008 IN PETITION NO. 1036 OF 2007 Bhaskar Ratilal Bhurabhai & Anr. ... Plaintiffs. V/s. Smt. Bhavini Manish Soni. ... Defendant. Mr. Nimish Pandya a/w. Meena Shah i/b. M/s. Pandya & Co. for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Q.M. Ashfaq for the Defendant. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 16th SEPTEMBER 2009. P.C. :- Heard learned Advocate appearing for the Plaintiffs and Mr. Ashfaq, learned Advocate appearing in support of this Motion. From a perusal of the prayers in the Notice of Motion, it is not seriously disputed by Mr. Ashfaq that the relief prayed thereunder, namely payment of arrears of maintenance pursuant to the orders of the Family Court, Mumbai cannot be granted by this Court in its limited jurisdiction. In the light of this, the Notice of Motion is clearly misconceived and not maintainable. It is, accordingly, dismissed. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)