: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1830 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 125 OF 2009 Tanvi Dinesh Patel ... Applicant Vs 1. State of Maharashtra & 2 ors. ... Respondents Mr. R.K. Mendadkar for the applicant. Mr. V.P. Malwankar, AGP, for the respondents No.1 to 3. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 24TH JULY, 2009. P.C.: 1. Civil Application is allowed to the extent of prayer clause (a) which reads thus: “(a) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to permit the applicant to amend the Writ Petition No.125 of 2009 as indicated in the Schedule annexed to this Application.” 2. Since Rule has already been granted and the matter is required to be : 2 : considered on merits, prayer clause (b) cannot be considered at this stage as a composite application cannot be entertained. The applicant is at liberty to file a separate application with regard to prayer clause (b) if he so desires. 3. Civil Application, accordingly, stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (R.M. SAVANT) (S.B. MHASE, J.)