IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3659 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE K.R.VYAS ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- SHREE VARDHMAN CO. OPERATIVE BANK LTD Versus SHRI LALITBHAI A MEHTA CONVENOR OF AHMEDABAD URBAN -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BHAYA for MS LILU K BHAYA for Petitioner MS DR KACHHAVAH for Respondent No. 1 MR INDRAVADAN PARMAR for Respondent No. 1 DELETED for Respondents No. 2-3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE K.R.VYAS Date of decision: 17/10/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT On 8.10.2001, learned Counsel for the petitioner, with a view to take instructions in the matter, sought time regarding the suit filed by the petitioner with respect to the subject matter of the petition. Today, when the matter is called out, it is stated that the suit, being Civil Suit No.6045 of 1998 is pending in the City Civil Court, at Ahmedabad. It may be stated that there cannot be parallel proceedings with respect to the same subject in two different Courts. In that view of the matter, no purpose will be served by keeping the petition pending in this Court. The petition is therefore, rejected without entering into the merits of the case. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. (K.R. Vyas, J.) Sreeram.