1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 8242 OF 2011 (Sau. Sonabai Tayaga Shinde VS. The State of Maharashtra and anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. V.D. Hon, Advocate h/f. Mr. A.D. Shinde, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. V.D. Godbharle, A.G.P. for the respondent-State ... CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 20.10.2011 P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. The impugned notice is squarely permissible in view of sub-section 7 of section 30 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949. 3. In that view of the matter, there is no substance in the Petition. Writ Petition is rejected. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M. T. JOSHI, J. ] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]