: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.990 OF 2003 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2609 OF 2003 Sushila M. Rohira & Ors. ....Plaintiffs V/s. Lotus Enterprises & Ors. ....Defendants Ms.S. Lakdawala i/b Kukreja & Co. for the Plaintiffs. Ms.Usha Singh i/b Vyas & Bhalwal for the Defendants. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 8TH JUNE, 2005. P.C. : 1. The suit is filed on a bill of exchange drawn by Defendant No.1 and accepted by Defendant No.2. There is no reply to the demand notice. 2. The facts in this matter are identical to the facts in Summons for Judgment No.878 of 2003 in Summons for Judgment No.2303 of 2003 wherein I rejected the defences by my order dated 7th June, 2005. For the same reasons, the defences are rejected in this matter also. Therefore there is no defence. : 2 : 3. In the circumstances, the Summons for Judgment is made absolute and the suit is decreed as prayed. 4. Refund as per rules. . For the purpose of refund of the court fees, the Prothonotary and Senior Master to act on an authenticated copy of this order.