1 BA 1530 AND 1296 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1530 OF 2011 Ashwin Vinod Panchal .. Applicant. -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1296 OF 2011 Pradip Tanaji Khillare .. Applicant. -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. P. R. Arjunwadkar, for the Applicant in Criminal Application No.1530 of 2011. Mrs. S. D. Shinde. , APP for the Respondent State in both applications. Mr. Sanjay Anabhawane, for the applicant in Criminal Application No.1296 of 2011. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 10th October, 2011 P.C. 1. These are two applications for bail by Ashwin Panchal and Pradip Tanaji Khilare, who are alleged to have assaulted Datta Patil and Sudhakar Patil. As far as Ashwin Panchal is concerned, his case cannot be distinguished from 2 BA 1530 AND 1296 that of Laxman Devidas Navgire, who has been admitted to bail by this Court, in Criminal Application No.1465 of 2011, except that of a Scoda car which was allegedly used for committing offence belongs to the wife of Ashwin Panchal. 2. As far as Pradip Tanaji Khillare is concerned, he seems to be the author of injuries caused to Sudhakar as well as Datta Patil, since the account of incident by first informant as well as eye witnesses, indicate that applicant Pradip was the assailant, though not named by them. Learned counsel for the applicant Pradep Khillare, submits that Datta Patil had described the assailant as slim person, whereas Sudhakar and some witnesses have described the person as well built. This is matter of perception which would have to be examined by the trial judge at the trial. A chopper used in assault was seized at the instance of Pradip Khillare. In view of this, Criminal Application No.1296 by Pradip Khillare is rejected. 3. Criminal Application No.1530 of 2011 by Ashwin Panchal is allowed. The applicant Ashwin Panchal, arrested in connection with C.R.No. I .181 of 2010, registered with Shil Diaghar Police Station, Thane be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs.25,000/-. 4. Both applications are disposed of. 5. The learned trial Judge would take up the case of the applicant for expeditious hearing and dispose of the same 3 BA 1530 AND 1296 as far as possible, having due regard to the older cases of under trial prisoners who may be in jail since before the applicant was arrested. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)