IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular First Appeal No. 2266 of 2002(O&M) Date of Decision: September 30, 2011. Davinder Kumar and others. ...... APPELLANT (s) Versus State of Haryana and others. ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Rajiv Parshad, DAG, Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present appeal has been filed against order dated 02.05.2001 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Rewari vide which reference under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter called as the ‘Act’) filed by present appellants was decided. It has been contended by learned counsel for the appellants that land belonging to other landowners was also acquired by the same RFA No.2266 of 2002 notification dated 30.03.1990 issued under Section 4 of the Act for development and utilization of the land for residential, commercial and institutional area at Rewari and the same was subsequently followed by notification dated 27.03.1991. It is further contended that Land Acquisition Collector awarded compensation in this case. Aggrieved against the same, land owners filed objections, which were referred to learned Additional District Judge, Rewari who decided the same and awarded compensation at the rate of `7,04,367/- per acre for the acquired land up to the depth of 100 meters and thereafter `6,00,000/- per acre irrespective of the quality of the land acquired. It is further contended by learned counsel for the appellants that the claim made by the appellants in the present case is squarely covered by judgment dated 16.09.2008 passed by this Court in RFA No.2636 of 2001 titled as Satish Kumar Jain v. State of Haryana and others and in some other RFAs. Learned counsel for the State does not dispute the facts stated by learned counsel for the appellants. Hence, for the detailed reasons recorded in RFA No.2636 of 2001, titled as Satish Kumar Jain v. State of Haryana and in LPA No.387 of 2001, titled as Pawan Kumar and another v. Land Acquisition Collector and others, the present appeal is also disposed of in the same terms. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) September 30, 2011. JUDGE 'om’ 2