IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11382 of 2010 1. KAMAL MESTAR, SON OF LATE ASARFI MESTAR 2. RAMU MESTAR, SON OF KAMAL MESTAR 3. RAM BINAY MESTAR, SON OF KAMAL MESTAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15/04/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 326 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the occurrence took place in the midst of an altercation when the parties lost control and there is a counter case instituted for the same occurrence by petitioner No. 1, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, sitamarhi, in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. 176 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are, they shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates - 2 - and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)