Crl.M.No.M-28412 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-28412 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:September 28, 2010 Sohan Singh alias Saun .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Gurnam Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.50737 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-28412 of 2010 The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.78, dated 25.3.2010, under Sections 399, 401, 402 IPC, Section 25 of the Arms Act and Sections 17/20 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, registered at Police Station City, Rajpura, District Patiala. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully, including the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala, vide which application filed on behalf of the present petitioner for anticipatory bail was dismissed. Brief allegations against the petitioner-accused are that he is member of a gang, who indulges in committing robberies and dacoities. Name of petitioner came in the statement of co-accused Waryam Singh. Petitioner managed to slip from the scene of occurrence, whereas co- accused were arrested. It is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. Crl.M.No.M-28412 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Sohan Singh alias Saun for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 28.9.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge