FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3020 OF 2010 ( Vithal Govindrao Gaikwad & Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. N.P. Patil-Jamalpurkar, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. K.G. Patil, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. V.D. Hon, Advocate for respondent No. 3. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATED : 21st October, 2010. PER COURT : 1. The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondent - Municipal Council, though has assured the petitioners that for regularizing the roads, the plots will have to be acquired and the roads would be provided for approaching to the main road, no action is taken. 2. From the perusal of the communication dated 27th of January 2010, it can be seen that what has been stated by the Municipal Council is that for regularizing the road, the plots will have to be acquired and that the said subject will be required to be kept before the General Body and thereafter, the steps will be taken. 3. We expect that the Municipal Council would take steps in accordance with law. The petition is, therefore, disposed of. [ A. A. SAYED ] [ B. R. GAVAI ] Judge Judge ssc/wp3020.10