1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 151 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 151 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 151 OF 2007 IN IN IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 98 OF 2007 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 98 OF 2007 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 98 OF 2007 James Anthony Maniamkot. .. Applicant. vs. Sheela James Maniamkot. .. Respondent. Ms. Poonam Bhatia for Applicant. Mr. Samungala & Veena Gawade for respondent. .. CORAM: J.N. PATEL & CORAM: J.N. PATEL & CORAM: J.N. PATEL & A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE: 8TH OCTOBER, 2007. DATE: 8TH OCTOBER, 2007. DATE: 8TH OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. . Heard. 2. The litigation expenses have already been paid to the respondent. The office objection, raised by the office, does not survive. 3. The Court is of the view that the maintenance granted to the respondent-wife and their children does 2 not call for any interference and will be subject to the decision in the appeal preferred by the husband. Therefore, the application for stay stands rejected. The appellant to pay maintenance regularly as provided under the impugned judgment. (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. )