/ 1 / IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3634 OF 2008 Vijaykumar Tukaram Bhosale ...Applicant Vs. Vijay Raghunath Lokare and Anr. ...Respondents --- Shri Datta H. Pawar for Applicant Shri D.P. Adsule, APP for State ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 11TH NOVEMBER, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant. The Applicant is challenging the judgment and order passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ichalkaranji, whereby the Learned Magistrate was pleased to acquit the Respondent Accused for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 2. Perusal of the judgment indicates that the Trial Court has noted the admission given by the Complainant in his cross examination that the cheque in question was given as a security. The Trial Court has also noted that the Complainant had admitted in his cross examination that the Respondent Accused had paid an amount of Rs.4,000/- thereafter. The Trial Court, therefore, came to the conclusion that the Complainant had not established that the cheque was given by the Accused for a legal liability. / 2 / 3. There is no infirmity or illegality in the order passed by the Learned Magistrate. No case is made out by the Applicant for grant of leave. Leave is accordingly refused. V.M. KANADE J.