THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1860 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioners filed W.P.No.29616 of 2010 stating that the respondents are making efforts to prevent them from discharging the duties in sub-stations under their control. The writ petition was disposed of on 26.11.2010 with an observation that in case the respondents propose to run the sub-station by engaging the persons of their own choice and if the sub-stations are not being run either departmentally or by assigning work to the Labour Contractors, the case of the petitioners shall be considered. This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents have violated the orders of this Court. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The relief, if at all was granted to the petitioner is in a very narrow compass. It is only when the sub-stations are not run either departmentally or through Labour Contractor, that the case of the petitioners was directed to be considered that too if the respondents were permitted to engage the persons of their choice. None of these ingredients are mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case. Therefore, it cannot be said that there was any acts of contempt on the part of the respondents. The contempt case is accordingly closed. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:31.12.2010. kdl