1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. O R D E R Ravi Kuma. Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 1417/2006 against the order dated 27-9-2006 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Raisinghnagar, in Criminal Revision No. 54/2004. ... Date of Order: November 09, 2006 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. N.L. Joshi, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor for the State. BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. By the order dated 27-9-2006, the Judicial Magistrate, Sri Vijaynagar, district Sri Ganganagar (for short, “the trial Court” hereinafter) took cognizance of the offence under Section 504 IPC against the present petitioner. That order came to be challenged by the petitioner before the Additional Sessions Judge, Raisinghnagar, district Sri Ganganagar (for short, “the Revisional Court” hereinafter). The revision petition filed by the petitioner was allowed and the order of the trial 2 Court was set-aside and the matter was remanded to the trial Court. It cannot be said that the petitioner is aggrieved of the order impugned. The order impugned has been passed on the revision petition filed by the petitioner. It will be open for the petitioner to raise the contentions which have been raised in this petition, before the trial Court. In this view of the matter, I do not find any merit in the miscellaneous petition. The criminal miscellaneous petition is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R. PANWAR), J. mcs