IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc. M No.23328 OF 2010 DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 15, 2010 Pardeep .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. (ORAL) The explanation of the Officer has been received. Prima- facie, I am not satisfied with the same. This is a case where the petitioner was released on bail by this Court, being a juvenile. Even if subsequently he was declared as major, the Additional Sessions Judge could not have directed him to be taken in custody. It has obviously led to violation of the orders passed by this Court. The explanation offered by the Officer does not seem to be justified to take an action, which the Officer did. Let this matter be placed before the Administrative Judge of the Officer concerned for taking any appropriate action as deemed Crl.Misc. M No.23328 OF 2010 :{ 2 }: necessary. The petitioner has since been released on bail. He will continue to participate in the trial. The case is accordingly disposed of. September 15, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE