A' •c^ '^ ^ INTHEHON'BLEHIGHCOURTOFCHHATTlSGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Sngie Bencb w.p.rcrNb^^^^^^^^^o^^ PETITIONER ^c^" ^^'^' '^n>'/ VERSUS RESPONDENT Manoj Kumar Dubey, aged about 36 years; S/o Shri Jagat Narayan Dubey, Bys Operator, R/o Nondaraha, Tahsil Kartala, Distt. K6rba(C.C3.) . Secretary Regional TranSRdrt Aufhori1|y, (BilaSpur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.GO'' -.-•••:;.:,1..:,'.^ WRIT PETITION UNDERjfliRTICLE 226 OF TKE CONSTITU'TION OF1NDIA 1.11-.—:—- :--.—--± ——--j.r..ii..-..i-—:u--l -.„ i^-L-^ir -t 4.1. iwqiffi^W^jBB "-<, MIGMCOURTOFCHHATTISGARH:BILASPUR WRItPETITION(C) N0.6565 OF 2010 PETITIONER ManojKumar Dubey Versus RESPONDENT Secretary, Regipnal Transport Authority, Bitaspur Gowri (WritPetition underArticle226ofthe Constitutionbf India) Single Bench : Hon'bleShri SatishK.Agnihotri.J. Present:- Shri B.L. Dembra and Shri Santosh Gupta, Advocates for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyerfor the State. ORDERfORAU (Passed on this 25th day of November, 2010) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for fhe petitioner submits that sincie the date ef Mearing of the applieation and the objeetiariif'hasbeenfixedon 29-11-2010, asisevidentfrom tKe affidavit filed by tMe Regional Transport Officer on 23-11-2010, nGitHihg sufvives in this petitipn for adjudiGaticiin andtlTe petition has becomeinfructucius. y 2. No Bbjection fttirfl other side. 3.. Aecardingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having becdme infructubus. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 ^