. @ (n a (c) raw/(9% V,, ILAUR DIVISION BENCH CORAIVI: HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA C J & ' FCWBL‘ SHR' 8U I’UN'AR $IN‘IA J Mlsc Apnea! IC} (PKR) No 1339i2008 AP‘F’ELLANTS 1. Smt Premlata Dewangan aged The ()rientai. insurance Company Limited, branch Office Kammi Line, Rajnandgaon, Thro'ugh Divisionai Manager, Divisiona! Office Katchahari chowk, jaii Road, Raipur ccver Note No.423580 period 12062002 to 31 06 2003 " Miscellaneous Agneal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicies Act 1938 sen : None forthe appeiiants. Pret ORDER (3th eephmber 20ne) o of- he Court was passed by t The foiioINing order Rajeev Gupta, CJ None for the appellants. ‘5 4 CLAIMANTs ab§dt 50 'y’€ql§, vvlu Kh’Ij Lal ‘ Dewangan, Occupation — house wife. 2. Kunj Lal Dewangan, s/o Shri Jhaduram Dewangan, aged about ‘ 52 years. Both R/o Aazad Chowk, Aarana PcHce Slatéon & TahsiE — narang, District Raipur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. Dwarpai, aged about 34 years, s/o ’ ' Gangudas, Ocwpation — Truck Driver R/o Daudekala P S Dharswwa TahSiI & District Raipu. (C G) $mt. $andhya Jain. wlo Shri Anil Jain, ewner 9f truck, Rlo V§vekanand Nagar, F'oiice Station‘Kotwali, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) 2) As there is no representation on behaif of the appellants, we are Ieft with no other option, but to dismiss the appeai for want of prosecution. 3) prosecution. The appeai, therefore, is dismissed for want of sat. i d pama ‘ ChiefJustice'S , _ i i