§§NGLE mum @r ® CFYov7/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 11:] w.P.No. L/é é ’ /2‘006 PETITIONER hanjan Singh Thakur, Aged B about 42 years, S/o. Late Ishwar a0\\OL’/‘€ “MA iaga: mg Phase—II: Thakur Bilas-pur R/o DevnanQan (C.G.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Department of Transport, D. K. S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Regional Transport Authority, Chhattisgarh at Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Regional Transport Authority Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA‘ \W 2L! HIGH GOURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W. P. No. 4661 of 2006 wr Petitioner : Bhanjan Singh Thakur Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh 6a othm's Shn’ Anand Kumar Tiwari, Advocata for fhe petitioner. Shn' Sanjay S. Agaywa], Government Advccate. for fhe respondents. QRDER ( 29th August, 2006) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has appliedior pemanent permit under Section 66 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 on 14.11.2005 before he respondent No.3. The petitioner has also availed the provisions of Sections 59, 70 end 71 of the Act for the purpose of adjudication of his above application for permanent permit. The route for which the petitioner has applied is Kodwagodan to Bilaspur via Manki, Khami, Lonni, Kota. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage submits that the respontients be dimcted to consider and decide the application of the petitioner, pending consideration before the respondent No.3 since 14.11.2005, in accmdance with law within a reasonabie time, to which. learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection. @ . The Respondem No.3 is accardingly dit‘ecmd to consider and dispose of the application of the petitioner, if any, on its own merit, in accotdance wim law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt 0f a copy of this order. . For the reasons stated above this petition stands disposed of. 1 i No mder as to costs. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sd/- t