1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.540/2010 (Manohar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of Order : 11.03.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI Mrs.Gayatri Rathore, for the petitioner. Mr.Laxman Meena, PP. By the Court: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the matter and now statements of 13 witnesses have already been recorded out of 25 witnesses. It is stated that petitioner is behind the bars for last 18 months, thus he may be extended benefit of bail, as the trial is likely to take time. Learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, has opposed this bail application and submits that at this stage, when the trial is going to be completed soon, petitioner may not be enlarged on bail. After considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, which may effect the out come of the trial but looking 2 to the facts available on record, I am not inclined to accept this bail application and accordingly, the same is dismissed. However, the trial Court is expected to expedite the trial and if possible then to conclude the same within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. If, for one or other justified reason, the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period, then after recording reasons thereupon, the trial should be expedited and be completed as quick as possible without further delay. (M.N. BHANDARI),J. Preety Item NO.S-20