1 S.B. Cr. Revision Petition No.572/2006 Mani Ram vs State of Rajasthan & Anr. DATE OF ORDER : 9.1.2007 HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI G.S. SARRAF Shri H.K. Jain, for the petitioner. Shri S.N. Tiwari, Public Prosecutor. Shri J.S. Chouhdary, for the respondent no.2. <><><> The petitioner has preferred this revision petition against the order dated 24.4.2006 of Addl. Sessions Judge, Anoopgarh setting aside the order of cognizance passed on 1.2.2005 by Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Anoopgarh. Heard Shri H.K. Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri S.N. Tiwari, Public Prosecutor and Shri J.S. Choudhary, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and perused the order of Addl. Sessions Judge, Anoopgarh carefully. The cheque was dishonoured on 20.6.2003 in respect of which a notice was given to the petitioner on 3.7.2003. The respondent no.2 thereafter filed a complaint against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act on 4.8.2003 whereas the petitioner filed the present complaint against the respondent no.2 on 8.9.2003. The question as to 2 whether the cheque is forged one can be considered and decided in the proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and no separate proceeding is necessary. The revisional court has discussed the case law on the point in detail and I fully endorsed the view taken by it. I find no ground for interference. The revision petition therefore, stands dismissed. (G.S. SARRAF), J. cpgoyal/-