IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6170 of 2011 Date of decision:- 05.10.2011 Raghbir Chand Sofat ...Petitioner Versus Narinder Kaur ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Rishav Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 12.09.2011 passed by the Additional District Judge, Patiala vide which the evidence of the respondent has been closed. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the evidence of the respondent was closed without giving him any opportunity by stating that no evidence of the respondent is present and adequate opportunities have already been granted to the respondent and there is no justification to grant further adjournment. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the respondent/wife took years to conclude her evidence but the petitioner has been given only four months. He has further submitted that due to transfer of the petitioner, he could not appear before the trial Court. The instant revision petition is accepted. Consequently, the impugned order dated 12.09.2011(Annexure P-1) is hereby set aside. The trial Court is directed to provide one more opportunity to the respondent, to conclude his evidence. October 05, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) G.Arora JUDGE