1 CR.APL NO.1860/2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1860 OF 2011 (Balu @ Balasaheb Janardhan Tarange and others Vs. The State) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mrs. Sadhana S.Jadhav, Adv., for the applicants. Mr.N.H.Borade, APP for State. Mr.A.G.Kulkarni, Adv., for R.2. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:June 14th, 2011 1. Heard Smt. Jadhav for the accused/applicants and Shri Kulkarni for respondent no.2 (Original complainant). Applicant No.2 Janardhan and applicant no.3 Narmadabai are father- in-law and mother-in-law of the respondent Smt. Sangitabai. 2. Both the spouses are at loggerheads, however, by virtue of good offices, they have resolved the controversy. The allegations are of brutally assaulting the wife giving rise to offenses under Sections 307, 498-A and 504 of IPC and also under Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. 2 CR.APL NO.1860/2011 3. The spouses have patched up their controversy and are happily residing together as husband and wife. In order to ensure that their marital tie does not further stretch to breaking point, it is expedient that the proceedings moved by the wife is permitted to be quashed as the wife does not want to further prosecute her husband. Taking these aspects into consideration, by exercise of power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. the impugned proceeding is quashed. The application is allowed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/1860-11crapl