IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50107 of 2008 CHIRANTI @ CHINTU, son of Sohray Paswan, resident of Mainpura, Bavan Toli, P.S. Patliputra, District Patna. ----Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6. 7.10.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under sections 394 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the F.I.R. is against unknown. However, the petitioner has been implicated in this case during the course of investigation on the confessional statement of the co-accused. The learned counsel further submits that the confessional statement of the co-accused persons before another co-accused should not be taken into consideration. Learned counsel submits that although it has not been mentioned in the petition, but there are two other criminal cases against the petitioner. The petitioner is in jail custody since 9.11.2006. Learned APP appearing for the State on perusal of the case diary vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that several materials have come during the investigation in the case diary like paragraphs 71, 115, 119 and 145 of the case diary stating the complicity of this petitioner in the alleged crime. Considering the serious nature of the alleged crime 2 and the materials placed by the learned A.P.P., I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. This application is, accordingly, rejected. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)