IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13687 of 2011 Prasidh Narayan Singh, son of Late Devendra Singh, Resident of Village and P.O. Dhangawan, P.S. Jehanabad, District Jehanabad, at the time of retirement posted as ‘Adeshpal’ in the office of Executive Engineer, Bihar Rajya Awas Bibhag Gaya, Distt- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Bihar State Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Bihar Rajya Awas Board, Patna. 3. The Managing Director, Bihar Rajya Awas Board, Patna. 4. The Managing Director, Housing Board, Bihar, Patna. 5. The Deputy Secretary, Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 6. The Executive Engineer, Housing Board, Gaya, District Gaya. 7. The Divisional Accountant (Lalan Prasad Verma), Housing Board, Gaya, Division, Gaya. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 3. 29.8.2011. Heard Shri Arun Kumar No.1, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Dinbandhu Singh, learned G.P.9, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1, 2 and 5/State of Bihar and Shri Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.3, 4, 6 and 7/Housing Board. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 31.10.2003 as Peon from the office of respondent no.6/Executive Engineer, Bihar State Housing Board, has prayed for directing the respondents to pay pension after according A.C.P. in view of Government Notification No.1 to the writ petition. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the relief sought for in the present writ petition, the petitioner has also filed representation before the competent authority. However, till date, no decision has been taken. It was further submitted that writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach before the authority concerned again. With the consent of parties, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before respondent no.4/Managing Director, Housing Board, Bihar, Patna for the reliefs sought for in the writ petition within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.4 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no.4 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is also required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in 3 case of refusal, respondent no.4 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within three months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)