IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) w.P. (S) No. ' 3’1 Z‘?’ /2011 PETITIONER Goutam Banjare s/o Late Shri b Phulchand Banjare aged about 31 years R/o. Village Tetarkhuti Chhatrapati shivaji ward No. 35 Jagdalpur Distt. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS /‘ ' RESPONDENTS (1) State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Health and family Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, , ' Raipur, (C.G.) (2) / Chief Medical And Helth officer office of Chief Medical and Health, officer Bastar, Jagdalpur(C.G.) W, (3) Block Medical and Health officer, Community Health Centre Tokapal ,Bastar (C.G.) «W I (4) Shri Anand Kumar Swi S/o Shri Gopal Singh Aged about 35 years, R/o Shiv Mandir Ward, Jagdalpur, Distt. Jagdalpur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA in a separate petition. Upon being inquired, it is informed that the petitioner has not med any review petition befor the Writ Court or even in the writ appeiiate Court. Leaving the petitioner to av ii such remedy as may be avaiiabie under the iaw, this petition is disposed off. Sd/— ~ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge XI~HC—-«7S W W, W i ‘,W v H w7>§>mtia>t 200 m m (We) ants! a?!W am mm mm Hf‘sH m We lanai d feetW e aim 37m $3: Hon ble Shrl ivlanindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 09-4 2-2011 1 Shri RS. Koshy, counsei fort e petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Pane Lawyer for the State I respondents 1 to 3 on advance copy. The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by the order of canceiia‘tion of his appointment. i At the outset, iearned counsei for the petitioner fairiy submitted that eartier, writ petition was med before the Co rt chaiienging process of appointment through which the petitioners were seiect d and appointed and that writ petition was aliowed and writ appeal was aiso ismissed. He however submits that in those matters the petitioners were not im ieaded as party and they had no notice and knowiedge. Therefore, the petition rs have now approached this Court by tiling this petition chaiienging the order of canceiiation of appointment. Learned counsei for the petitioner submits that duri g the pendency of the writ petition, orders of appointment were issued on 16j1'i 010 which fact was not brought to the notice ) of the concerned Court by any of th parties. _He further submits that this fact was i’g‘ I,7 not brought to the knowledge of the ppeiiate Court aiso. &a" i am afraid, this Court can ot come to any aid of the petitioner. The grounds which have been raised b the petitioner, cannot be aliowed to be raised