IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9421 of 2010 HARE KRISHNA GHOSH & ORS . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 15.06.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The writ petition is being disposed at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the parties. The petitioner relies upon the order of the Circle Officer dated 1.12.1999 claiming recommendation for settlement in his favour. The impugned order directs him to vacate the lands in question. It recites that despite opportunity he had not produced any substantive evidence in support of his claim. Learned Counsel disputes the recitals by placing reliance upon the aforesaid settlement order. Any dispossession from the lands can be only in accordance with law. The writ application is disposed with the observation that if the petitioner has filed the recommendation of the Circle Officer for settlement in his favour that is a document to be appropriately considered and discussed in any final order that may be passed by the authorities only whereafter the notice for eviction can be given effect to. The writ application stands disposed. (Navin Sinha,J.) Snkumar/-