IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.358 of 2008 SAHDEO RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 5.2.2009 KHAN Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a Panchayat Sewak. He submits that the complainant, who was a candidate for Sarpanch, alleged that there was change of serial number of his name as well as of his election symbol. He further alleged that when he went to the B.D.O. to make a complaint, he was abused by the B.D.O. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even assuming the entire allegations to be true, neither any offence is made out against the petitioner nor in fact there is any allegation against him, still in column no.7 of the F.I.R. he has been made an accused. Learned State counsel files counter affidavit stating therein that the police has submitted final report finding the case to be a mistake of fact. In view of the aforesaid counter affidavit, this court is not passing any positive order quashing the prosecution. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J)