HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 1252 OF 2009 Dated: 30-10-2009 Between: M/s. Leela Marine, rep., by its Managing Partner G. Seshagiri Rao, Plot No.14, Fishing Harbour, Visakhapatnam ... APPELLANT AND Government of India, rep., by its Secretary (Ports), New Delhi and another ... RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 1252 OF 2009 JUDGEMENT: (per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) Being aggrieved by an order dated 22-07-2009 passed in Writ Petition No. 14240 of 2009, this appeal has been filed by the appellant – original petitioner. 2. The aforestated petition has been dismissed as Writ Petition No. 14495 of 2009 involving identical question had been dismissed. 3. Order passed in Writ Petition No. 14495 of 2009 has been confirmed in Writ Appeal No. 1063 of 2009 on 27-07-2009. However, while dismissing the appeal, the Division Bench directed the respondents to furnish complete break-up of amount demanded from the appellant – petitioner. In the circumstances, we also direct the respondents to give the break-up of the amount, which has been demanded from the appellant – petitioner. 4. It has been submitted by the learned advocates appearing for the parties that electricity supply has been disconnected and it has been submitted by the learned advocate for the appellant that almost entire principal amount payable in respect of electricity supply charges had been paid. The dispute is only with regard to interest. 5. Looking to the facts of the case, we direct the respondents to restore electricity supply as either entire or substantial amount payable towards electricity charges had been paid. Break-up shall be supplied to the appellant – petitioner within three weeks from today and within four weeks from the date of receipt of the details, the appellant – petitioner shall file its objections, if any, and till that time, unless there is another default, electricity supply shall not be disconnected. 6. Subject to the above directions, the appeal stands disposed of with no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel to disposal of the appeal, WAMP No. 2616 of 2009, filed by the appellant for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 30-10-2009 ks Note: Furnish copy by 03-11-2009. B/O ks