IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 969 of 2007 (M/B) Anil Rawat & others ………………Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand through Senior Superintendent Of Police, Dehradun, District Dehradun, & others …………..Responden ts. Sri Mohd. Azim, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Sandeep Tandon, Advocate, present for the petitioners Sri Tanuj Semwal, A.G.A., present for the State. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Learned counsel for the parties are present. (2) Sri Tanuj Semwal, learned Asst. Government Advocate makes a statement that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed against the petitioners Anil Rawat, Kapil Singhal and Sharad Bansal. A short counter affidavit has also been filed by the Investigating Officer to this effect. (3) In view of the above development, this writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with the observation that the interim order dated 20th September 2007, passed by this Court shall automatically stand vacated from the date charge sheet is received by the court concerned. (Dharam Veer, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 11.06.2008 NS