IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2011 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 OP(C).No. 4090 of 2011(O) -------------------------------- CMA.60/2011 of IST ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, THRISSUR .................... PETITIONERS ----------------- 1. PAULSON,S/O.NIRAPPEL KURUVILA, PATTIKKAD DESOM,PANANCHERY VILLAGE,THRISSUR TALUK, 2. VIJITHA PAULSON,W/O.PAULSON,PATTIKKAD DESOM,PANANCHERY VILLAGE,THRISSUR TALUK. 3. ELIAKUTTY,W/O.NIRAPPEL KURUVILA, PATTIKKAD DESOM,PANANCHERY VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN SRI.P.P.RAMACHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- SUSY KISHOR,W/O.NIRAPPEL KISHOR SYRIAC, PATTIKKAD DESOM,PANANCHERY VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs O.P.(C). NO. 4090/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF CM.APPEAL.NO.60 OF 2011-FIRST ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, THRISSUR,DTD.27.4.2011. P2: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.P(C).2059/2011 DATED 12.7.2011. P3: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT,THRISSUR IN CMA.60/2011 DTD 25.7.2011. P4: COPY OF THE IA.3812/2011 FOR APPOINTMENT OF ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER DTD 24.9.2011. P5: COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A.3812/2011 IN CMA.60/2011 OF THE FIRST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THRISSUR, DTD.20.10.2011. P6: COPY OF THE ADDITIONAL WORK MEMO FILED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE COMMISSIONER DTD NIL. P7: COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER DTD.14.11.2011. P8: COPY OF THE I.A.4358 OF 2011 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT DTD.22.11.2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------- O.P(C).No. 4090 of 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this 13th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioners are the appellants in C.M.A.No.60 of 2011 of the Court of learned first Additional District Judge, Thrissur. Challenge in that appeal is to the dismissal of I.A.No.3658 of 2011 in O.S.No.1066 of 2011 of the Court of learned Munsiff, Thrissur. 2. The parties were before this Court in O.P(C).No.2059 of 2011 and this Court by Ext.P2, judgment dated 12.07.2011 issued certain directions for preservation of the property until the C.M appeal is disposed of. Petitioners say that the properties are preserved in accordance with the direction contained in Ext.P2, judgment but the C.M appeal has to be disposed of as early as possible. 3. Without understanding the volume of work of the Court concerned it is not proper for me to issue any direction for time bound disposal but, having regard to the grievance of petitioners learned first Additional District Judge is directed to dispose of C.M.A.No.60 of 2011 as early as possible. This original petition is disposed of with the above direction. (THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE) Sbna/-