iff6 ^lug HE6H COURT OF CHHATTESSARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (5) No. 3178 of 2008 Petition&rs 1. Jagdish Prafiad Sautam, ag&d abdut 32 years, son of shri 5hiv Prasad 6autoan, Posted QS - Constobte, 9<h Banation C.A.F. bantewada (C6) 2. Dilip Singh aged about 37 years, son of Late Rustatri Sin9h p»<esently working as Mead Constable, Specksj Task Force. 5th Battalkm, CAf. Jagdalpur bistt. Bastar (C6) 3. Niraj Kumar son of Late Murari Lal a9ed about 35 year-s, presentty working os Head Constable, 5ft Battalian Special Task Force, CAF Jogdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C&) 4. Vijoy Kumar Mjshra, 090^ about 27 y^ars, son of Shri Sohdeo Prasod Mi^ira. presently working os Consluble, 8th Bandion C.A.F. Rajnandg00" (c6) 5. AMiendrcKuniarTiwari.flgedabout31 yea^ son of ^iri Chhotebt Tiwari, working as Constodbte, 5th Battalian, CAF,Ja9datpur(C6) 6. Pramod Kumar 5harma, aged about 36 years, son of 5hri Aa^iai'am Siafma. working as (^ad Constabk, 5th Battatian CAF, JG^dalpur, Distt. Bastor (C6) 7- Brijesh Sin9h, ag&d about 31 years, son of Shri Jai Suigh, presently working as Constable, 8th Battalian, CAF, Rajnandgaon (CG} 8. Veerbhaai Singh son of Shn Oiatur Singh, ogsd obout 33 years, working as Constabis, 5th Battaticn, CAF Jagdatpur (C6) 9. Kok Singh son of 5hri Aasharam 5in9h, a9ed about 40 years, presently working os Head Constabie 8th BattaJicm C.6. Armed Force, Rajnandgaon (C^) 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Versus Re^oridents 1. 2. [D^ Mohe^h 5^iofwa son of S^iri Na'Hiu Ram Siarma. QQsd about 34 years, presently workhg as Head Constabie 5.T.F. Jagdolpur, (C6) Vinod 6upta, aged obout 36 years. son of Shri Ram Babu 6upta, presentty working os Head Constable 9til Bottatian, Chhatl'i^orh Armed porce, Dontewada (C^) Manoj Panday aged about 34 yeors, son of Shri Jo^mohGBi Panctey. pr'e^ntly workin9 QS Head Constdaite 13th Battalian, C.©. Avmed Foree Bango, Distt-. Korba (C6) Radheshyam aged about 39 years, son of SSiw'i Nek Ram presently working as Head Constabk, 12th Banatian Chhatti^arh Armed Force, ftamanu^anuj, Disn. Sarguja (C©) ftam Praka^i oQe.d cA>out 35 years, son of 9hri baru Lal Pr&fi&ntly workir^g as Constable 7th Barraiiaai. Chhanisgorh Armed Force, Bhilai Disn. Durg {CG} Monoj Kufiusr Labriya, QQ&d about 33 years, son of Shri ftam Bharose Lalariya, pre3&ntly workir^ as htead Constabte, 13th Battaiian. CAF Bango Disn. Korba (C6) Baldev Singh aged about 34 y^irs, son of Shri Khet Pat Smgh presentfy working os Head Constabte 13 Battalian CAF Bango Distt. Korba (C6) Pohdwon 5ingh Kshatri, c^ed about 37 years, son of Siri Ram ROEJQ Singh presently working as head Constable, 5th Battatian, CAF Jd9dalpur (CG) State of Oihatti^gorh, Throu^i +h& Chief Secretary, Oou (Calyaal Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) State of Madhya Pradesh throu9h the Chief 5ec tapy, Ballabh Bhawon, Bhopal(M.P.) The bir&ctor 6an&ral of Pojice, Police head QLWirrer, faiipur (C6) •''^ r! '"i%^® ""^ i: '^. l^ ^ ./ '%^^^: -~ 3 4. 5. 6. /o^ TTie birector <Seneral of Police, Police Heaci Quarter, Bhopai (A ) The Director Geiwral of C.6. Armed Force/Uaad Qxirfrer Bhifai bistrict Durg (C6) Union of 3iidia, through 1+ie Secretary, M.inistry of P&rsonn&l, Public 6rievances. (Chan Market, New belhi. WRrrPETTTOIN UNbEK ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA Singl®Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Slnri V. Vijay. Advoaite for the petitioners. Shri Ajay bwiveds, beputy fiovt; Advocate for the R&jspond^its No. i, 3 OBid5. Siri Ko^iif Siak&sl, AdvoGate for the Unbn of Tndia/Re^ondent No. 6. ORAL ORbER (Possed on this 25th doy of June, 20€^) 1- With th& consent of the par^&s appeoring h th& matt&r, tha p&titbn \& fsnally heard- 2. Leam&d coun5&l appeuarsng for the petitioners submits thdt he do&s not wont to press this petition on m&rit exc^t that th& p&titione.rs b& p&rmitt&d to mcske a repres&ntation to the Committee in the light of th®jud^ment and order dated 17th Aprit, 2007 passed by this CourtinB, R. Sodbole Vs. Muntcipol Corponitton, Durg and othen {2007 (2) CSLJ 417}, to which leamed counsel oppearing for the r&spondent/State has no objection- 3. Accordingty/the petition is di^ppsed of in th& some terlm5 i-&- the Conimsttee so constituted is directed to consider the rapr&sentation nusdia by th& p&tstioners, if th&iit represeyitation^ are not conssdar&d l?^t s~; ;:; 'ov earlser. In l4ie event, if the reprcssentations are not consid»<ed earSier, the fresh representations may be considered, as early as possible within a perbd of four months from the Aate of receipt of the representations. This exercise on tha papt of the fioyemment of Indio mff/ be cowpleteci within a period of four mon'H'is frorp tiie date of r^ceipt of a copy of thi5 order- Tliukur' Sd/- Satish K.Agmhotri Judge