RFA No. 152 of 2011 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH RFA No. 152 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.05.2011 Janta Kalyan Samiti ...Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. B.K. Bagri, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. D.D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. Challenge in the present appeal is to the order dated 19.03.2008 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Rewari. The landowner has filed appeal seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Brief facts of the case are that vide notification dated 10.09.1992, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (for short “the Act”), sought to acquire land situated within the revenue estate of village Rudh, Tehsil Bawal, District Rewari for setting up industrial Growth Centre at Bawal. The same was followed by notification dated 3.9.1993 issued under Section 6 of the Act. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short “the Collector”) vide award dated 25.08.1995 assessed the market value of the acquired land @ 90,000/- per acre for chahi land; ` 1,40,000/- per acre for gair mumkin land; ` 2,00,000/- per acre up to the depth of two acres of both sides of NH-8. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the landowner filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ` 4,00,000/- per acre for all types of land upto the depth of two acre on both RFA No. 152 of 2011 2 sides of National Highway No.8 and ` 3,00,000/- per acre for the remaining land. Learned counsel for the landowner submitted that the claim made in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in RFA No. 3323 of 2005 Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation and another Vs. Gindori and others decided on August 23, 2010. The aforesaid fact was not disputed by the learned counsel for the State. For the reasons recorded in Gindori’s case (supra), the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 27.05.2011 sharmila