/ t^- 1 <=^ JNJHEiHGHCQURTOFLCHHATTLSG'ARHATBILASPUR WRITPETITIONfSlNo. ^431 OF 2009. j^ PETmONERtSf Resi3pndentsi /•^ \^^'^ .^^^ ^cw ^^ ^ »^>' ShriO.P. Upadhyay S/o Shri L.P. Upadhyay Aged about 57 years, R/o nandini Kunuj, Bharati Nagar, Bilaspur (CG) Versus 1. /'State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Agriculture (Animal Husbandry) Departanent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2.Y The Director, Vetenary Services, Agriculture (Animal Husbandry) Department, Near Gadi Chowk, Arang Road, Raipur (CG) / •, .' 3. Jt. Director, Vetenary Services, Agriculture (Animal Husbandry) Department, Composite Bldg., Opposite Collectorate, Bilaspur (CG) WRIT PETITQIN UNDER ARTJCLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDJA. The petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under: . 1,1.1ili E2BBS" PETITIONER RESPONDENT HIOHCOURT OFCHHATriSGARH: BILASPUR WRIT PETITIONtSl N0.6481 OF 2009 O. P. Upadhyay Versus State of Chhattisgarh and others (Writ petitton under Articles 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Berieh: Hon'bleShri &rtlshK. Agnihotri,.!. Present: - Shri Vinod Deshmukh, counsel Tor the petitioner. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on this l0'l'day ofNovember, 2009) With the consent bf leamed counset appearlng for the parties, the petition is heardflnally. (2) Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to seeond Kramonati (Time bound aclvancement benefit) on the ground that the petitioner hascompieted more than 24years in the service ofthe State Government. Learned counsel further submits that the Commissioner-cum-Director, Veterinary Services, C.G. vide order dated 06-Q4-2009, ,has recommended to the Seoretary, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Department of Agriculture (Animal Musbandry) for grant af second Kramonati (Time bound advancement benefit) to the petitioner. Despite the above recommendation, nothing has happened till date. Thereafter, the correspondence between the parties were made on 08-05-2009 and 29-07-2009 for considering the case of the petitioher for grant of secondKramonati CTime bound advancement benefrt). The mafter is still underconsidpration before the respondent authorities, and as such, there is no wayto approach this Court in a writ. (3) Having regard to the fact situationof the case, it is expected that the State Govemment may consider the case of the petitioner in continuation to the recommendation of the Commissioner-cum-Directpr, Veterinary Servioes, C.G. vide order dated 06-04-2009 and the subsequent correspondence made between the parties and decide the same as expeditibusly as possible.in accordance with law, in •*:.its cwn perspective. Observations made hereinabove, ifany, maynot be underetood as opinlon ofthe Court. (4) ln view of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- SafebK-Agn Judge ibotn