\IW 1.. )?“20x 1.1 1AM). NU IHB52003 mm m 200 ‘emim 1m? (W) MWW mmm Wwm WW wW %aimaré¥1 23.6.2003 Shri Prashant Mishra, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Rajesh Pandey, Gm Hoard. Shri Mishra submits tha final order, the appeal waS alk Lo L116 Sub-Divisional Ofl'lcer, t a dated 28.1.2003 passed by order dated 5.3.2003 and / t the proceedings fOr removal oi; ,f~ respondent No. 4 had taken place. The respondent No. 4 preferred an appeal before the Additional Collector, Rajnandgaon. The stay was mot granted Ultimately, by the )Wcd and matter wasrcmandcd ho on remand has maintained he order. Thereafter, an app a1 was preferred. This time the ppellate authority has stay d the operation of the order e Sub—Divisional Officer vide e matter remained pending. Application for vacating stay as filed on 7.4.2003. That is not being heard. This Court 't. Advocate for the State. s dealt the matter in detail in @ WvPr Mo [43$ 2003 Wm “in 200 warm (Wm vaiH// Ao .e Mm N