IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 28TH JUNE 2010 / 7TH ASHADHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 724 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.20777/2009 Dated 05/08/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. K.T.DEEPTHI, AGED 42, W/O.M.UDAYAKUMAR, ROHINI, KALYANI NAGAR, RAMANADAPURAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. HARIDASAN, AGED 45,S/O.KUNJU, SRAMBIKALTHODI, PARASSERY P.O., KONGAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. K.M.NISHAD, AGED 38, S/O.MOIDEENKUTTY, PALLIMANJAYALIL HOUSE, THEROOR P.O., PARALI (VIA), PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SMT.PREETHY KARUNAKARAN SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- K.JAYAKUMAR, AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY AND AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION COMMISSIONER. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- Contempt Court(C)No.724 of 2010 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 28th DAY OF JUNE, 2010 JUDGMENT By Annexure-I order, this Court directed the respondent to grant an effective opportunity to the petitioners to peruse the documents to pin-pointedly answer the memo of charges and statement of allegations. It was directed that further action in the matter will be proceeded only after allowing the petitioners an effective opportunity to peruse the documents. It is pointed out that Annexure-II order has been passed in violation of the above directions. 2. The learned Government Pleader on instructions submitted that the petitioners have been asked to appear on 3.7.2010 for perusing the documents. Further action will be taken only thereafter. The same is recorded. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that Annexure-2 order finalising the proceedings may have to be withdrawn by the respondents. In the light of the fact that a fresh opportunity is given, it is upto the respondent to take decision on that aspect. Contempt Case(C)No.724/10 -2- The petitioners can also seek appropriate directions in the pending Writ Petition. The Contempt of Court Case is closed. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. dsn