CMPMO 347 of 2008. 24.9.2008 Present: Mr. V.D.Khidta, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Addl. AG, for the respondents. This petition has been filed by the petitioner herein against the order of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 1, Shimla allowing the production of two documents on record of the case. The application Annexure P-1 filed by the State for placing on record the documents, to say the least, is not only terse but is worse than Mofussil pleadings. The manner in which the application has been drafted leaves much to be desired and displays a lack of seriousness in pursuing the case. The Court should have been cautious in examining the application before passing the order. It is not supported by an affidavit of the defendant. How and in what circumstances such an application came to be filed is not clear. The order itself displays a lackadaisical approach by the learned trial -2- Court. The learned Court has not at all applied its mind to the facts of this case. Having said this, I do not wish to put the clock back so far as the trial of the case is concerned. The documents having been taken on record of the case, shall not constitute proof of the facts stated therein which have to be proved in accordance with law. This petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending application(s) shall also stand disposed of. September 24, 2008 (PC). (Dev Darshan Sud), J.