IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI MONDAY, THE 14TH MARCH 2011 / 23RD PHALGUNA 1932 MACA.No. 2800 of 2009() ---------------------------------- OPMV.372/1999 of MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, KALPETTA, WAYANAD. .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------- SAJEEVAN A.K., AGED 38 YEARS, S/O. CHINNAN, ANDIKKATTIL HOUSE, CHELLAMKODE POST, VYTHIRI TALUK, WAYANAD DIST. BY ADV. SRI.N.J.ANTONY RESPONDENTS (RESPONDENTS): ------------------------------------------------- 1. P. DEVADASSAN, AGE NOT KNOWN, S/O. RAMAN NAIR, 'AISWARYA', VADUVANCHAL POST, VYTHIRI TALUK, WAYANAD DISTRICT (OWNER OF JEEP NO. KL-10F/6073). 2. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., KALPETTA, (POLICY NO. 570309/31/98/630572) 3. K.C. RAMESH BABU, AGE NOT KNOWN, S/O. KARUNAKARAN, MOTTIL HOUSE, CHALAD POST, KANNUR DISTRICT, (DRIVER OF MOTOR CYCLE NO. KL-13 B/3142 D.L. NO. NOT KNOWN) 4. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., KALPETTA (POLICY NO. 31760463589693/11104 VALID FROM 16-05-1998 TO 15/05/99. 5. P. SURESH S/O. M.K. PAZHANAM AMBATT POST, PALLAMCHATHANNUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, (OWNER OF MOTOR CYCLE NO. KL-13B/3142). 6. KUNHUMON @ ANDRAYOS, S/O. CHACKO, MATTAPPALLIL HOUSE, VATTATHUVAYAL, VADUVANCHAL POST (DRIVER OF THE JEEP NO. KL-10F/6073). R1 & R6 BY ADV. SMT.CELINE JOSEPH. R2 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE CHERIAN (THIRUVALLA). R4 BY ADV. SRI.LAL GEORGE. R5 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MOHANAN (PALAKKAD). THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs A.K.BASHEER & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= M.A.C.A.No. 2800 of 2009 & C.M.Appln. No. 3299 of 2009 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= Dated this the 14th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT Basheer, J. This appeal has been filed with a petition to condone the delay of 680 days in filing the appeal. When this case was taken up for consideration on the last occasion vis., on March 9, 2011, the appellant and his counsel were absent. Therefore, the case was posted for orders/disposal. 2. Today also when the case is taken up for consideration, neither the appellant nor his counsel is present. Therefore, the appeal and the delay petition are dismissed for non-prosecution. A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE mn.