HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR Writ Petition (Art. 227) No.1021 of 2011 {Writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of india} . Present: Mr. Anil Kant Gupta, counsel for the petitioner. ‘ -.. ..--- Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J ORAL ORDER (22-7-2011) . By this writ petition under Article 227 of the constitution of lndia, the petitioner has challenged legality and propriety of the order dated 14-1 0-2008 passed by the Tahsildar, Raigarh in Revenue Case No.01-A-70/08-09; order dated 7-1- 2009 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Raigarh in Revenue Appeal No.16/A—70/2008-09; and order dated 18-11-2010 passed by the Board of Revenue, Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur in Revision Petition No.RN/13/R—A-70/400l 2009. . i have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the orders impugned and other documents. . . As per the order dated 18-1 1-2010, in compliance of the orders of the revenue courts, the petitioner herein has been dispossessed from the land in question. All documents reveal that the land has not been allotted to the petitioner on lease or the petitioner is not bhumi swami of the land. ln these circumstances, the question for consideration would be only academic in nature and grant of substantive relief in favour of the petitioner would not be possible. Consequently, the petition is dismissed summarily. However, the petitioner is at liberty‘to redress her grievances before the competent authority. No order as to costs. 4. All the pending applications stand disposed of. V , / l ,_r*’/S¢l‘ ytdge Soma v. sham“ PETlTlONER/: Rukmani Khunte aged. (Defendant) about 45 Widow of late Rameshwar Khunte, Village Chhote Atarmuda, Raigarh and District Raigarh (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTI: Pallav (Plaintiff) Gangopadhyay, aged about years, S/o Shambhunath Gangopadhyay, Village Chhote Atarmuda, Raigarh and District