CWP No. 3558 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 3558 of 2009 Date of Decision: May 26, 2009 Panna Ram ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. Om Parkash Kashyap, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. The dispute in this case centers around the recovery of 1/3rd amount from the pension of the petitioner without any notice on the ground that at the time of his retirement full gratuity was wrongly released to him because there was a motor cycle loan amount due against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vary fairly conceded that the petitioner is ready that the amount be deducted in reasonable instalments rather than imposing this harsh cut. He has very gracefully offered an amount of Rs. 400/- per month to be deducted from the pension of the petitioner. Notice of motion. Mr.Harish Rathee, Senior DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner has supplied six copies CWP No. 3558 of 2009 2 of the writ petition to the learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana today in Court itself. Mr. Rathee has also very candidly accepted the fair prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. In the circumstances this writ petition is disposed of in the terms of the agreement of learned counsel for the parties. It is, however, made clear that the respondent No.2 shall make available to the petitioner the complete account statement up-to-date so that in case there is some discrepancy the petitioner can take up the matter with the department. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE May 26, 2009 sunita