1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1509 OF 2010 (Priyadarshani Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha ...versus... Sau. Lalita Sureshrao Undre and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : MARCH 31, 2010. Heard Mr.Apurva De, the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel contends that respondent no.1 is the wife of President of the Petitioner Sanstha and she has signed the Change Report as also consent letter therefor and then the same were presented on 13/12/2007 to the office of the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Amravati. According to him, this shows that she was all the while aware of the proceedings and hence reasons given by her in paragraph 6 of her application for condonation of delay, are incorrect and false. With the assistance of the learned counsel, I have perused the relevant papers. It shows that the order dated 01/2/2008, passed by the Deputy Charity Commissioner, Amravati in Change Report No. 675/2007, is challenged by her in appeal before the Joint Charity Commissioner, Amravati Region, on 12/5/2008. This Court vide judgment dated 07/9/2009 in Writ Petition No. 2897/2009, permitted her to file an application for condonation of delay and accordingly she filed that 2 application on 16/9/2009 vide Exh.25. The Joint Charity Commissioner has, after hearing the parties, by impugned order, condoned the delay. From the arguments of the learned counsel, it appears that there is matrimonial discord between the President of the petitioner and respondent no.1 and both are not residing together. Though, merely because she signed the Change Report along with her husband, does not show that she is also aware of the subsequent order passed by the Deputy Charity Commissioner in the matter. In this situation, particularly when there is matrimonial discord between the parties, I am not inclined to interfere in the use of discretion by the appellate authority. Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE Diwale