MQE %E%\§$% L‘E ‘ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No EVQL /2005 L PETIONER Aun Kumar Agrawal, S/o. Late Radheshyam Agrawal , Aged about 4O year, R/o. Seth Basant Lal Marg, Ambikapur (C-G-) VERSUS State of Chhasgarh, tti Through Secretary Departmt of Transport, Ru RESPONDENTS State Transport Authority, Chhattisgarh at Raipur. Asstant Secretary, State Transport Authority, Rapur (.G.) C S/o. ate Shri Kishan Chand Sao, Aged about 85 yars R/o. Power House Road, Ramanuj ganj , District Surguja (C. G.) Shiv Nadan Sao, WRIT PETIION UNDER ARTICL 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. x TI r s en aipr si i L e, ' / T E XI—HC-22 22-7-2005 Mr. B.K. Rawa'r, c0unsel for 1'he pe'rifioner. Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Govt Advocate for 1-he SfaTe/respondeMs No.1 ‘ro 3. Heard bo1'h The counsei. ’ The pefi‘rioner by The ins‘ran‘r writ pefi‘rion under Arficle 226 of ‘rhe V Consfi‘rufion of India has ques‘ri ‘ The legalify of order da‘red 8-7-2005 passed by respondent No.2, whe by respondent No.2 has granfed infer- Sfm‘e permh‘ from Ramanujganj f0 Dalfanganj To respondem No.4. Revision lies agains‘l' The imp gned order. p i Learned counsel for The Tioner submiTs ThaT The peTiTioner was ’ required To file The insTanT wriT p TiTion before This CourT, as The Presiding Officer was noT posted in The STa e TransporT AppeIlaTe Tribunal. Now, The Presiding Officer has already been posTed and noTificaTion is issued To ThaT effecT, Theref re, The peTiTioner should file a revision before The STAT. As far as The question of li iTaTion is concerned, learned counsel for The peTiTioner submiTs ThaT‘since his wriT peTiTi‘on was filed on accounT of non-funcTioning of The STAT, as s ch, The peTiTioner may file an applicaTion . for condonaTion of delay in filing he revision, and The STAT may consider The said lapplicaTion. The prayer made by learn d counsel for The peTiTioner is jusT and reasonable. The peTiTioner can i le an applicaTion before The STAT for o d condond‘tion of delay in filing fhe revision, and The STAT should consider- ‘fhe said applica‘i’ion, in accordance wifh law. Wifh fhe aforesaid observc‘rion and direc'rions; The pe‘i‘i‘rion stands disposed of. Consequen‘i'ly, M.(W.)P.No.2650/2005 and I.A.No.6180/2005 also sfand disposed of. Sdl’ Parfies are en‘l'i‘i‘led for cer'r fied copy of This order. g/V L.C.Bha"“° judge (@W) XI-HC-22 W 33W, Wm, WW3? Wm mamas 2005 m Wmww WWW§W®W ~2» éamm