FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1121 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 1121 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 1121 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri D.R.More APP for applicant None for respondent. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE,J. MHATRE,J. MHATRE,J. DTAED: DTAED: DTAED: 1ST SEPTEMBER, 2006 1ST SEPTEMBER, 2006 1ST SEPTEMBER, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This application is directed against the order of acquittal passed by the learned 4th Addl.Sessions Judge, Thane in Sessions case No.160 of 2005. From the perusal of the record and the impugned order, it is an obvious case of consent. The conduct of the prosecutrix itself is evidentally proved. In such circumstances, acquittal under section 376 and other connected offences is proper. No interference is called for. Hence application for leave is dismissed. ...