IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29818 of 2008 CHHOTE LAL SAH S/O LATE BHIKKARI SAH R/O VILL. LACHHANAUTA, P.S. SATHI, DIST. WEST CHAMPARAN. ----- PETITIONER. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. BATASHA DEVI W/O CHHOTE LAL SAH D/O YADOLAL SAH, R/O VILL. LACHHANAUTA, PS. SATHI DIST. WEST CHAMPARAN. ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar No.1,Advocate. For the Opp. Party no.2 : Mr. Sanjay Kr. No. 7,Advocate. 07. 22.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the informant. In compliance of the order dated 08.04.2009 an affidavit has been filed today by the petitioner (husband) stating therein that he is now ready to keep the complainant with due dignity and honour. Learned counsel for the opposite party submits that the date be kindly fixed in the case so that both the parties appear on that date and from there the petitioner shall take the complainant to the matrimonial home and the complainant shall accompany him. Having heard both parties, the present application is being disposed of in the following manner: Let petitioner, above named surrender in the court below on or before 04.05.2009. On his such surrendering the court below shall grant him bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the Satisfaction of the S.D.J.M. Bettiah, West 2 Champaran in connection with Complaint Case no. 1150 of 2003 (Trial No. 843 of 2005). The petitioner undertakes to appear before the learned court below (Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran) on 04.05.2009 in the first half. Learned lawyer appearing on behalf of the opposite party no.2 submits before this court that on that day (04.05.2009) the complainant shall also appear in person before the court of S.D.J.M. Bettiah and from there itself the complainant shall accompany the petitioner to her matrimonial home. The undertaking so furnished before this court in the terms noted above is one of the conditions of the bail, failing which the trial court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)