1 Cri.Appl.No.2317 of 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2317 OF 2004 Shaikh Salauddin S/o.Shaikh Kalemoddin, Age-30 years, Occu-Business, R/o.Dharmabad, Tq.Dharmabad, Dist. Nanded APPLICANT VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra 2. Md.Ekbal S/o.Abdul Wahed, Age-45 years, Occu-Business, R/o.Dharmabad, Tq.Dharmabad, Dist. Nanded. 3. Shriram Investments Ltd., Regional Office, 1-158/6/6, 1st floor, Srinidhi Complex S.D.Road, Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh, Through its Branch at Shriram Investments Ltd., D.No.5-6-570/13, Above TVS Suzuki Showroom, Hyderabad Road, Nizamabad. RESPONDENTS Mr.A.M.Gaikwad, learned counsel for the applicant. Mr.N.H.Borade, learned A.P.P. for respondent State. Mr.U.B.Bilolikar, learned counsel for respondent no.2 Mr.M.S.Nilwant h/f. Mr.S.B.Talekar, learned counsel for respondent no.3. (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 07/03/2011 2 Cri.Appl.No.2317 of 2004 ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. By the present application u/s. 482 of The Cr.P.C., the applicant has questioned the correctness of the order passed in Criminal Revision No.12/2004 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Biloli, dated 22/07/2004 by which learned Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision as not maintainable. 2. In this application, Rule was issued on 17/09/2005. 3. The application arises out of the order passed about the custody of Vehicle Truck No. Mh-31-AP-963 which was handed over to respondent no.2 vide order dated 27/05/2004 in Cri.Appl. No. 15/2004. It appears that there is an agreement entered into about the sale of the said truck to the petitioner by the respondent no.2, to which finance was provided by the respondent no.3. Considering the fact that there is dispute about who is the legal owner of the vehicle in question and in absence of that decision, the order passed u/s. 257 of The Cr.P.C. by the learned Trial Court, dismissing the revision by the learned Additional Sessions Judge is not maintainable. 4. Now on instructions, learned counsel for applicant has not pressed this application with the request to give directions to the Trial Court to decide pending criminal case on the basis of CR No. 25/2000 registered in Dharmabad Police Station within a stipulated period. I find no impediment to accede this request. Application 3 Cri.Appl.No.2317 of 2004 stands disposed of as not pressed with the direction to the Learned Trial Court J.M.F.C. Dharmabad to decide the pending trial on his file within the period of 6 months from the date of receipt of writ of this order, if not already disposed of. 5. Rule stands discharged. Application stands disposed of as indicated above. Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/MAR. 2011/cri.appl.2317-04