¢ mg: f; a e? § yfgfwkpa r. r wryfpn / ® (743 gasp BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILAsPUR (c.G..) WRIT PETITION (cmo. W2?” 12010 PETITIONERS 1. S. Darshan Singh Saluja S/o. Late Malla Singh Saluja, aged about 50 years, /2. Smt. Jatinder Kour Saluja W/o. Shri Maninder Pal Singh Saluja, aged about 45 years, R/o. Nehru Nagar, Bhilai‘ District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT x/: Municipal CorporatiOn, Raipur, Through— it’s Commissioner, District Raipur (C.Gt) WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA. W ”Kw m2 § ‘« / (‘7) HIGH COURTOE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 4427 of 2°10 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Ms. Nausina Afrin Aii, with Shri Saurabh Dangi, Advocates for the petitioners. . Shri Pankaj AgrawaL Advocate for the respondent. ORDER ORAL (Passed 0n 1,2 day of August, 201 O) Ashok Petitionets S. Damhan Singh Saluja & Another Versus Resnondent Municipal Corporation, Raipur. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation submits that there is no contemplation for demolition of any structure, which is duly legal and authorised, in respect of the petitioners, without affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. 2. Shri Agrawal further submits that no demolition in respect of the property in dispute shail be done without affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. 3. in view of foregoing. nothing remains in thb petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed with the above‘ stated observation. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge