IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No. 24940 of 2001 Between: 1 K. Sridevi D/o Ravinder Kodad Public School, Kodad, Nalgonda District. 2 Killi Samrajua Laxmi D/o Narasaiah Sirisha Vidyaniketan Public School, Suryapet, Nalgonda District. 3 J. Uma Devi D/o Raghava Chari Vivekananda Vidyamandhir, Damargidda Man, Mahaboobnagar District. 4 Laxmi D/o Prahaladha Reddy St. Agnes School, Jedcherla, Mahaboobnagar District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Director, I/C Distance Education Centre Sree Padmavathi Mahila University, Tirupathi. 2 The Registrar, Sree Padmavathi Mahila University, Tirupathi. 3 The District Educational Officer, Nalgonda District. 4 The District Educational Officer, Mahaboobnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the illegal action of the Respondent 1 and 2 imposing the condition of getting attestation on our service certificates and not accepting applications without attestation on our service certificates issued by the concerned school management and approached to the 3rd 4th Respondents to get attestation the 3rd and 4th Respondent are refusing to attest in our service certificates in spite of showing order of this Court in W.P.No.1642/94 and batch is illegal, arbitrary and violation of rights to opportunity in B.Ed Distance Education course under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Indian Constitution and consequently direct the Respondent No.1 and 2 to accept application of the petitioners by admitting into the course as per rules and regulations without getting attestation on service certificates by holding the action of the 3rd and 4th Respondent not attesting on our service certificates is illegal, arbitrary. Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.KOONA REDDY ANJI REDDY Counsel for Respondents : SMT.CHINTALAPUDI LAKSHMI KUMARI The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no cause survives in this writ petition and it has become infructuous. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA, J Date: 8.7.2005 DA To 1 The Director, I/C Distance Education Centre Sree Padmavathi Mahila University, Tirupathi. 2 The Registrar, Sree Padmavathi Mahila University, Tirupathi. 3 The District Educational Officer, Nalgonda District. 4 The District Educational Officer, Mahaboobnagar District. 5 Two CD copies.