hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 8351 OF 2011 Lalmansingh Hanivant Singh ... Petitioner Versus Om Chamunda Coop. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. A.S. Uraizee i/by M/s. Uraizee & Law Associates for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Khandeparkar i/by Ms. Shilpa Joshi for respondent no. 1. CORAM : A.S. OKA,J. DATED : NOVEMBER 17, 2011 P.C. By this petition under article 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has challenged the order passed by the learned Judge of the Court of Small Causes by which the application for amendment of the plaint made by the first respondent was allowed. 2. The impugned order is purely an interlocutory order. If the decree passed in the suit is adverse to the petitioner, while preferring an appeal against the decree, the petitioner can always challenge the impugned 1 hvn order. 3. Subject to what is observed above, writ petition is not entertained and the same is disposed of by keeping all the contentions open. 4. Time to carry out amendment is extended by period of two weeks from today. Needless to say that the petitioner will be entitled to file additional written statement after amendment is carried out. The learned counsel appearing for the parties agree that all contentions including the issue of jurisdiction shall be decided at the time of final hearing of the suit. (A.S. OKA,J.) 2