IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. 48225-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION : 26.09.2006 Rajinder Singh alias Raju .... PETITIONER Versus State of Punjab ..... RESPONDENT CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Anil Kumar Lamdharia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Gill, AAG, Punjab. * * * Petitioner Rajinder Singh alias Raju has filed this petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 48 dated 23.2.2006 under Sections 302/201 IPC, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Amritsar. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR as well as the order dated 20.5.2006, passed by Sessions Judge, Amritsar, whereby bail application of the petitioner has been dismissed. Counsel for the petitioner refers to some news item published in a news paper. While referring to the news item, counsel contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. After hearing counsel for the parties, I do not find any substance in the contention of counsel for the petitioner. In this case, dead body of son of the complainant, who was missing since 22.2.2006, was found on 23.2.2006. His head, both feet, legs and arms were amputated. Subsequently, during investigation, the petitioner made extra judicial confession before one Navdeep Singh confessing his guilt. Thereafter, he was arrested. During his custody, he made disclosure statement in the Crl. Misc. No. 48225-M of 2006 -2- presence of Tehsildar. On the basis of the said disclosure statement, skull of the deceased was recovered. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, material collected during investigation and the nature of heinous crime, alleged to have been committed, I am not inclined to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. September 26, 2006 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE