Crl. Misc. No.M-20646 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-20646 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 17, 2011 Balwinder Singh …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. Pardeep Rajput, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.K.S. Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner has been attributed simple injury with base ball bat on the complainant Pran Dev. All the offences except for offence under Sections 307and 452 IPC are bailable. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the matter has been compromised as a result of which complainant deposed an affidavit, annexure P-2. Crl. Misc. No.M-20646 of 2011 [2] I have taken into consideration all the facts and circumstances of this case. The petitioner has been able to evade his arrest since February 2009. The petitioner being a member of unlawful assembly had allegedly attacked the complainant armed with kirpan and base ball bat. The affidavit of Pran Dev being self-contradictory appears to have been obtained by misusing the liberty, as the complainant in para 3 has deposed that the accused who gave injuries had their faces covered and he had not recognized them. In para 4, he has deposed that with the intervention of local police and people of the mohalla, the matter has been compromised. No ground is made out for the grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner Dismissed. However, the petitioner may appear before the Illaqa Magistrate. In case of petitioner’s doing so, his application for regular bail may be decided on the basis of the alleged compromise within a period of four days by the competent Court of jurisdiction. August 17, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE