i^l .»<"'(?'! ^-£r sstafisg! BWICIl! IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.ISl N0. /2008 PETITIONER •^•i^- vX (,v>^ •^d^" ^••9o -^'"^../ ..^'^3S?'""" ^'y'-^" ;^.>- ,fSS" RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. ^^ .•^ << JC? .c^f~^3 b^-&' © ^^ <y 6. Devcharan Patel, S/o Shri Gokul Prasad Patel, Aged about 29 years, R/o C/o Shri D.C. Patel, Madhuban Road, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur (C.G.)) State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, General Adniinistration Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Secretary of Home Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Through : The Secretary, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Roktima Rai, D/0 Shri D.P. Rai, Aged about 32 Years, R/0 D.P. Rai Bhawan, Naya Sarkanda, Bangalipara, Bilaspur (C.G.) Gopi Chand Meshram, aged about 26 years, Deputy Superintendent of Police , R/0 C/0 C.G. Police Academy, ChandraKhuri, Mandir Hasod, District Raipur (CG) LaMian Lal Patle, aged about 33 years, Deputy Superintendent of Police , R/0 C/0 C.G. Police Academy, Chandrakhuri, Mandir Hasod, District Raipur (CG) WRIT^ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA mOH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR WRTTPETmONfS) No. 4385 of200i PETmONER RE8PONDENTS Devcharan Patel. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE GONSTmjnOM OF INDIA .^< ...- '.;>..... ; :.. - ••..:..• SB: Hon'ble Shri SattshK. AsnBiutri. J. Present: Shri Prateek Shanna, Advocate for the petitioner. ShriY.S.Thakur,DeputyAdvocateG®ueralfbrtheState/ ; respondent No. 1 and 2. Shri B.D.Gum, Advocate forthe CGPSC/respoadent No. 3, None forthe other respondents. ORDERfORAD (Passed on 20u'dayoif NovetBbei^ 2009) , 1. 2. 3. By this petition the petittoner seeks to quadh the select/merit Ust dated 17ttl May, 2007, issued by fhe Chhattisgarh Public Serviee Comamssion on tte ; groundthat it is violative ofthe Chhattisgarh Police Executive (Gazetted) Services Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2005 (for short 'fhe Rules, 2005') and farther a direction to the respondent authorities to issue a fiesh ; selecVmerit list in accordance with the Rules, 20Q5 for the post ofDeputy Superintendeirt ofPoliee with all consequeirtial benefits; Leamed counsel appearing for the parties joiatly suteut tiiat the issue involved herein tius petition is squarely covered by the judgmeat ofthis Court, pronouncedtoday i.e. 16 November, 2009, mRtchaMiShra v.State ofChhattisgarh & others and other coaneetedmatters. In view ofthe foregoing, this petitibn stands disposed of in terms of the judgnecLtmRichaMishra(suprsi). No order asto costs. Sd/- • SatishK.Agnihotri I Judge III