IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 22ND DECEMBER 2009 / 1ST POUSHA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 1509 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.24801/2009 Dated 29/10/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.V.JAYASREE, AGED 45 YEARS, W/O.P.B.UNNIKRISHNAN NAIR, A.11, FACT TOWNSHIP, UDYOGAMANDAL.P.O-683 501. BY ADVS. SRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI SMT.SMITHA GEORGE RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. SRI.K.PRADEEP KUMAR, FATHER'S NAME AND AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESIDENT, FACT EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD NO E 129, UDYOGAMANDAL.P.O-683 501. 2. SMT.GEETHAJEE PALLIPPADAN,FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,SECRETARY, FACT EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD, NO.E 129, UDYOGAMANDAL. P.O-683 501. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rkc S.SIRI JAGAN,J. ------------------------- Contempt Case No.1509 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 22nd December,2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner complains violation of Annexure-A judgment. Petitioner was only a respondent in Annexure -A judgment. By Annexure-A judgment, this Court only dismissed the writ petition filed by the respondents. In the same there is no direction as such to be complied with by the respondents herein. Therefore, I do not think that there is any disobedience of any directions contained in Annexure-A judgment. If the petitioner seeks execution of orders impugned in the writ petition, which led to Annexure-A judgment, the petitioner's remedy lies elsewhere. Therefore, I do not find any merit in the Contempt Case and according the Contempt Case is dismissed. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ma 2 3