IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 385 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 18 OF 2006 V P K URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT ....Applicant SOCIETY LTD. Versus MR. SURESH NANA CHODANKAR AND ....Respondents ANR., Mr. Prasanna Chaudikar,Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A. R. Kantak, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 10th January, 2007 P.C.:- Heard the learned Counsel on behalf of both the parties. On behalf of the respondent no.1 reliance has been placed on the decision of this Court in M/s Venus Steel, Products v. Michael Francis Pinheiro and another(2005(2) G.L.R. 481). The Order of acquittal dated 28-9-2006 cannot be interfered with in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. With the above observation, the application is hereby dismissed. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.