1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28/11/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA Second Appeal (MD) No.899 of 2011 and M.P.(MD).No.3 of 2011 Kottaisamy ... Appellant/Respondent/Plaintiff Vs. Kaliyappan ... Respondent/Appellant/Defendant Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 10.04.2006 passed in Appeal Suit No.37 of 2006 by the learned II Additional Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli, reversing the judgment and decree dated 07.10.2005 passed in Original Suit No.552 of 2003 by the learned II Additional District Munsif, Tirunelveli. For appellant ... Mr.M.S.Jawaharlal For respondent ... Mr.S.Kumar for Mr.S.Balasubramaniam JUDGMENT At the hearing, both sides are represented by their counsel. I Perused the mediation report which would show that Mr.Kaliyappan, who is the defendant/respondent herein, admitted that Mr.Kottaisamy, who is the plaintiff/appellant herein, is the owner of the suit property concerned and that Kaliyappan would not interfere with the suit property. The trial Court decreed the suit, but the first appellate Court reversed it, as against which the plaintiff preferred the second appeal. 2.In view of the compromise entered into between the parties, that too before the Mediation Centre attached to this Court, I am of the view that the same could be accepted. Accordingly, the second appeal is allowed, setting aside the order of the first appellate Court and restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. gcg Sd/- Assistant Registrar[RTI] /True copy/ To Sub Assistant Registrar 1.THE SECOND ADDITIONAL SUBORDINATE JUDGE, TIRUNELVELI. 2.THE SECOND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, TIRUNELVELI. +1 CC TO M/S.M.S.JAWAHARLAL, ADVOCATE SR.NO.41665. S.A.(MD)No.899 of 2011 Dated:28.11.2011 1P/4C RPB : 02.01.2012 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/