1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 30 OF 2005 in PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.105 OF 2003 Hari Hotumal Tanwani .. Petitioner versus 1. Commissioner, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation, & ors .. Respondents & Shri Naresh K.Sidhwa .. Applicant (Intervenor) ... Mr.Naresh K.Sidhwa in person for Intervenor Mr.Vijay Patil for Respondent No.1 CORAM CORAM CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND : R.M. LODHA AND : R.M. LODHA AND D.G. D.G. D.G. KARNIK, JJ KARNIK, JJ KARNIK, JJ DATED DATED DATED : 23rd November 2005. : 23rd November 2005. : 23rd November 2005. P.C:- Heard. 2. We perused the application. 2 3. The applicant Shri Naresh K.Sidhwa is permitted to intervene in the Writ Petition. 4. To that extent, the application is granted. Prayer (b) does not deserve to be granted and is rejected accordingly. 5. We clarify that though the applicant has been permitted to intervene in the matter, it is not necessary to implead the said applicant as a party respondent in the Writ Petition. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA, J) LODHA, J) LODHA, J) (D.G. (D.G. (D.G. KARNIK, J) KARNIK, J) KARNIK, J)