IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39609 of 2009 1. KISHUN RAJAK S/O GUHAN RAJAK R/O VILL- KASRAUTI, P.S- SONO, DISTT- JAMUI 2. JOGI RAJAK S/O LATE GANESH RAJAK R/O VILL- TILAKPUR, P.S- SONO, DISTT- JAMUI 3. BASANTI DEVI W/O SURESH RAJAK R/O VILL- MADHOPUR, PORKATHA, P.S- CHANDERMANDIH, DISTT- JAMUI 4. SURESH RAJAK S/O LATE KISUN RAJAK R/O VILL- MADHOPUR, PORKATHA, P.S- CHANDERMANDIH, DISTT- JAMUI----------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR With Cr. Misc. no.3156 of 2010 Pintu Rajak, son of Sahdeo Rajak, resident of vill.-Tilakpur, P.S.-Sono, Distt.-Jamui------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PETITIONER Versus The State of Bihar ----------- 2. 16.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. It appears a clear case of misuse of provision made to helpless ladies, only it appears to ascertain as to whether it is the act of the complainant herself or the legal brain which she approached. Reason behind making of such observation is villagers have been also involved making assertion of commitment of rape, might be possible but that is shown done to pressurize the complainant and her parental family members to provide more dowry that is followed by attempt of family members to sprinkle kerosene oil but failed to light match. Further she is shown to have every freedom to come to her in-laws and to her parental house, informed the incident to her parents on telephone and keep her sister with her to watch the incident and to become a witness even in matrimonial house. In any case this divergent unbelievable and contradictory allegations may never be taken for refusal of anticipatory bail. - 2 - Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of communication of this order the above named petitioners of both the petitions shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J. M., Jamui, in connection with Complaint Case no.1225C of 2008 , subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J. )