THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No: 24349 of 2009 BETWEEN: 1. Uppu Adi Reddy S/o. Hanumaiah, R/o. Velichala Village, Ramadurgu Mandal, Karimnagar District, and others. PETITIONERS And 1. The Collector (ROR), Karimnagar District, Karimnagar, and others. RESPONDENTS Counsel For The Petitioner: M/s. K. Venumadhav Counsel for the Respondents: G.P. for Revenue The Court made the following order: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent in not passing any orders on the stay petition filed in Revision Petition No.D1/8162/2008 dated 17.12.2008, as arbitrary and illegal. According to the petitioners, when their names were not properly reflected in the revenue records, they represented the matter before the Tahsildar, the third respondent herein. In view of the said representation, the third respondent passed order on 21.10.1993 stating that the petitioners are in possession of the land admeasuring Ac.4.35 gts., in Sy.No.696 situated at Velichala Village, Ramadugu Mandal, Karimnagar District. However, when the said order was not implemented, the petitioners filed W.P.No.7204 of 2004 before this Court and the said writ petition was disposed of on 16.11.2005 directing the third respondent to consider the case of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders. In pursuance of the said order, the Tahsildar concerned addressed a letter to the second respondent. Treating the said letter as appeal, the second respondent passed orders on 13.11.2008 refusing to issue pattedar pass books and mutate the names of the petitioners in the revenue records. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioners filed a Revision Petition under Section 9 of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattedar Pass book Act, 1971, before the Joint Collector, Karimnagar. It is their grievance that though the Revision was taken on file, the stay petition filed along with the said Revision, is not disposed of so far, and taking advantage of the same, the respondents are trying to dispossess them from the land in question. Under those circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits, the first respondent-Joint Collector, Karimnagar, is directed to dispose of the Revision Petition purported to have been filed by the petitioners being aggrieved by the order passed by the second respondent on 13.11.2008, and pass appropriate orders as per law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, during the pendency of the Revision Petition, the respondents are directed to maintain status quo as to the entries in the revenue records. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. ________________ (C.V. RAMULU, J.) 11th November, 2009 Js.