: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.29697 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2462 OF 2007 Mane Dattatray Eknath .. Petitioner V/s. The Secretary, Jijamata Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Ors. .. Respondents Mr. I.M. Khairdi for the Petitioner. Mr. R.S. Alange for Respondent No.1. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 5 TH MARCH, 2010. P.C.: 1. The Review Petition has been preferred against my order dated 2nd August, 2007. By this order, I had confirmed the findings of the School Tribunal, Pune Region at Solapur, that there was no need to condone the delay in filing the Appeal before the School Tribunal. The petitioner has filed an Appeal contending that he was superseded. 2. Mr. Khairdi, the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, brings to my notice the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of : 2 : Mohammad Hasan Khan vs. Mohammad Majidulla & Ors., reported in 2002 (4) ALL MR 512, in which a Division Bench has held that the provision of limitation contained in Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act is not applicable to the cases of supersession filed under Section 9(1)(b). It applies to only those matters which are covered under 9(1)(a) of the said Act. 3. Mr. Alange, appearing for respondent No.1, concedes this position. 4. In view of the aforesaid judgment of the Division Bench of this Court, which was unfortunately not brought to my notice when the earlier order was passed, the order dated 2nd August, 2007, is recalled. 5. The Review Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). 6. Place the Writ Petition for admission before the appropriate Court.