1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4566 OF 2001 Dr.Nandini Pawan - PETITIONER VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra & Ors. - RESPONDENTS ***** Mr.D.R.Irale-Patil,Advocate for Petitioner; Mr.R.P.Phatake,AGP for Resp.Nos. 1, 2, 3 & 5; Mrs.Manjusha A. Deshpande, Adv. for Resp.No.4. ----- CORAM : S.B.DESHMUKH & K.U.CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATE : 31st August, 2010. ORAL ORDER (PER:S.B.DESHMUKH,J.) 1) Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2) The petitioner approached to this Court seeking a writ of mandamus for quashing and setting aside the order dated 19th October, 2001, passed by Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Aurangabad. 3) Mrs. Deshpande, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.4, on instructions, 2 makes a statement that the Respondent No.4 has been appointed in place of the present petitioner. 4) In this view of the matter, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this petition and the petition has become infructuous on account of passage of time. 4) The Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Rule discharged. No costs. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) (S.B.DESHMUKH) JUDGE JUDGE bdv/