IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 1243 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 16/09/2008 in WP NO : 15154 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Jane Lrine Bennyson D/o.R.H.Bannyson N.S.B.A U.P.S Rajahmundry E.G District ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The Govt of A.P rep.by its principal Secretary Education(SEPS.II) Department Secretariat Hyderabad 2 The Director of School Education Hyderabad 3 The Regional Joint Director of School Education Kakinada 4 The District Education Officer East Godavari District Kakinada 5 M.E.O Rajahmundry(Urban) Rajhmundry E.G District 6 Sri Victoria Aided U.P.S Rajahmundry E.G District rep.by Correspondent 7 The N.S.B.A U.P.S Rajahmundry E.G District Rep.by its Sepcial Officer 8 Kum B.Ratnamba D/o.Apparao, E.G District .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.P.VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) Being aggrieved by the order dated 16-9-2008 passed in W.P.No. 15154 of 2008, this appeal has been filed. The appellant is the original petitioner who is a Teacher working in respondent No.7 School. The grievance ventilated in the petition is with regard to the transfer of respondent No.8 Teacher from respondent No.6 School to respondent No.7 School. The case of the petitioner- appellant before the learned Single Judge was that she was appointed in the 7th respondent School in the year 1984 as Second Grade Teacher and since then she has been working continuously and in view of her meritorious service and seniority she has been placed on Full Additional Charge of the post of Principal of the 7th respondent School. The learned Single Judge did not entertain the petition on the ground that for administrative reasons, it is always open to the employer to transfer teachers from one School to another School. We have heard the learned Advocate for the appellant and have gone through the papers. We are in agreement with the view expressed by the learned Single Judge. The appellant-petitioner has no right to prevent somebody being transferred to one School from another. These are all exigencies of administration and normally this Court will not interfere with such matters, especially when the appellant-petitioner herself is not transferred. The appeal stands dismissed with no order as to costs. _____________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ __________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 29th September, 2008. GRR