THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO :12819 of 2010 Date: 8.6.2010 Between: Medapureddy Sivagiri Rao ..... PETITIONER AND The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Peddapuram and others. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri D.V. Chalapathi Rao Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 : Asst. Government Pleader for Home The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No : 12819 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside the order dated 20.5.2010 in M.C. No.6 of 2010 passed by Respondent No.6 under Section 144(5) of Cr.P.C. confirming the order dated 14.4.2010 passed under Section 144(2) of Cr.P.C. I have heard Sri D.V. Chalapathi Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. Under the impugned order, Respondent No.6 confirmed his earlier order dated 14.4.2010 passed under Section 144(2) of Cr.P.C. restraining the petitioner and others between whom there is a dispute over an immovable property from entering the property in question. In my opinion, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed for more than one. Under Section 144(6), the petitioner is entitled to approach the State Government for rescinding the order passed by respondent No.6. The petitioner also has another effective remedy available under Section 397 of Cr.P.C., by way of a revision before the Sessions Court. In view of the availability of these remedies, which in my opinion, are efficacious, I do not find any reason to entertain the writ petition for issuance of a mandamus. More over, the impugned order is going to expire within a few days from now by operation of Section 144(4) of Cr.P.C. For the above mentioned reasons, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. __________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY,J DATE: 8th June, 2010 Note: Furnish c.c in five days. B/o pnb