IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18663 of 2009 1. SHYAM NANDAN PANDEY S/O LATE RAMHIT PANDEY R/O VILL- PIRHA, P.S. BABUBARHI, DISTT. MADHUBANI Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR PARIVAHAN BHAWAN, BIRCHAND PATEL ROAD, PATNA 2. CHIEF OF ADMINISTRATION BIHAR STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, PARIVAHAN BHAWAN, BIRCHAND PATEL ROAD, PATNA 3. CHIEF OF OPERATION BIHAR STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, PARIVAHAN BHAWAN, BIRCHAND PATEL ROAD, PATNA 4. DIVISIONAL MANAGER BIHAR STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, DARBHANGA DIVISION, LAHERIASARAI, DARBHANGA 5. DEPOT SUPERINTENDENT DARBHANGA DEPOT, BIHAR STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, DARBHANGA 6. DIVISIONAL MANAGER BIHAR STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, PURNEA DIVISION, PURNEA 02/ 28.1.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Patna (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation). 2. Petitioner is a conductor in the Corporation. He is aggrieved by the order, bearing memo No. 1847 dated 5.12.2009, Annexure-1 to this application, whereunder he has been transferred from Babubarhi in Darbhanga Division to Purnea Division. Learned counsel for the Corporation with reference to the contents of Annexure-2 dated 7.12.2009, states that petitioner has already been relieved to join Purnea Division. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that till date he has not been given any travelling allowance, as such, he has not been able to join the transferred post. 4. Let the petitioner join the transferred Division, as early as possible, in any case within one week from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order and thereafter apply for grant of travelling - 2 - allowance as per the rules, which should be paid to the petitioner along with the salary for the subsequent month. 5. It is further submitted on behalf of the petitioner that before his transfer, he was posted at Babubarhi on the ground that his wife an ANM, is also posted at Babubarhi but while directing his transfer, the authorities overlooked such fact. 6. Let the petitioner represent before the competent authority requesting the competent authority to consider his case for posting along with his wife, which should be considered in accordance with law in the light of the relevant circular of the State Government, as early as possible, in any case within a reasonable time. 7. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)