1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2303 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 2303 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 2303 OF 2008 Mr. Mahesh Zaveri. .. Petitioner. vs. Bank of Rajasthan & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. Pratap Sampat i/by Vilas A. Jadhav for Petitioner. Mr. Prateek Sahsenia i/by M/s. Boski Sharma & Ms. Sowjanja Menon for Respondent No.1. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & A.A. SAYED, JJ A.A. SAYED, JJ A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE: 8TH APRIL, 2008. DATE: 8TH APRIL, 2008. DATE: 8TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. . Not on Board. Mentioned. 2. Heard due to the urgency expressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. The petitioner has approached this Court invoking its extra-ordinary jurisdiction to intervene 2 in the matter of attachment of petitioner’s property by the respondent bank after seeking assistance from the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate. 4. The learned counsel for the Respondent Bank submits that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of preferring an appeal. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it is only after the petitioner loses possession that he will be able to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal in the matter. Whatever may be the case, this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition in view of the decision in the case of Mardia Chemicals Limited v. Union of India, reported in AIR 2004 SC 2371 which is followed by the High Court of Bombay and is a consistent view. Therefore, the petition is dismissed. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (A.A. Sayed, J.) (A.A. Sayed, J.) (A.A. Sayed, J.)