Writ Petition No. 1579 (SS) of 2004 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Civil Misc. Application No. 8932 of 2005 Heard Sri Anil Bisht, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted the controversy raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 21.01.2004 passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 7212 (SS) of 2001 (Smt. Parvati Pandey Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others), consequently, the present writ petition may be decided on the same terms of the aforesaid judgment. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is finally disposed of in the same terms and condition of judgment and order dated 21.01.2004 passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 7212 (SS) of 2001 (Smt. Parvati Pandey Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others). Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. 25.10.2005 (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) S.K.S.