^ / - |<27' INTHE HIGFrcOURTOFJUDIGATURE.ATBll-ASMR. (C.G.) W.P.fc^NO. 3 3 3'-1 /2Q11 PETITIONER: / Dinesh Kumar Ravatre, S/o Sura} Ravatre, aged about 25 years, R/o Village Kolihamar, Post & Tah. Gurur, Oist. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDANTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Ministry of health, Through Secretary, Secretariat Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) ^ 2. Superintendent of Police, Durg, Dist. Durg (C.G.) ^ 3. Block Medical Officer, Publio Health Centre, Gurur, Dist. DuFg, (C.G.) ^-'4. Collector, Durg, Dist. Durg (C.G.) 5. Dr. D.K. Pat, S/o MahendFa Kumar Pal, R/o Bharda, Tah. Gurur, Dist. Durg (C.G.) 6. Station Officer, Police Station, Gurur, Dfet. Durg (C.G.) PETn-IONUNDER ARTICLE226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA !fffl ^"^ ^l^^ ^ XI-HC—7S ^ST -^W{v^f, '&TS\WI&, f°<Qiiyy ..l^.t?..-....CCr)..'^.:..3.i3^.1^ sv^^^v C<^^fi) sn^a 'sfs R-ii* wnan^gniw ^iiw^ift^sn^i '^Tirf^Tqt^ "HFRff ^f 'fe^ ^^K ^SlfOTSlI^T SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 22-e7-2QU Shri B.P.Gupta, counsel for t fte petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Murthv, De^uty State/respondents 1 to 4 and 6. Advocate General for the The grievance of the petitiorj though respondent No.5 has b^ reaistration and possession of recol taken. made representation to number of| and 6 but no action is being taken. Officer has already made enquiryl Gurur vide his memo dated 29/12/11 ier as set out in this petition is that even en treating patients without any valid )nized medical degree, no action is being Learned counsel for the p^titioner submits that the petitioner had authorities including respondents 2, 3, 4 He further submits fhat the Biock Medical and sent report to the police station - O but on that, no action is being taken. in case, if the petitioneralle^es that respondent No.5 has committed an offence and on that ailegation, i|eport has been lodged, respondent No.6 is under obiigation to hold investiga|tion in the matter. , From memo dated 29/12/101 Block Medical OfOcer has sent the investigation of the poiice, i^ (Annexure P/10), it is revealed that the report to the police station regarding credentiai of the certificate of respcjndent No.5. it is for the concerned police station to make necessary investig^ition. If the petitioner is not satisfied with wiil be open for the petitioner to file compiaint in a Court of law for ijiitiatton of criminal proceedings against respondent No.5 on the aliegation jof commission of offence alteged by the XI-HC—78 3TA?i 'qa R-)i* 'OTisn^i's^iN; Deepii 3~^ "^ffiTRTq, ^xNpR', fsjdiy^< ..ifS.b..Ccil.^.:..3.t3^/!!. sn^T 'li3ra' (l,<<fj'!f<t;T) petitioner. In addition, if the petitio^ier has made any representation to the State. the State shall aiso look int with law. The petition is accordingiy fin^lly disposed off. 4)l<(f<n4)t ^iftf^ ^ f^%i <f^i^i< ^i'aifaHsn^T 3 the same and proceed In accordance •^ys^,«» ^^ Vfi ^a^c