IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18220 of 2010 RAMNARAIN PANDIT @ HAWALDAR PANDIT son of Algu Pandit, resident of village – Jewahi math, P S – Tareya Suzan, Dist. Kushinagar (UP) ___ Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ___ Opposite party ----------- 03. 15.09.2010 The Court is not willing to reconsider the prayer for bail of the petitioner keeping in view that this is not the first instance of petitioner being involved in serious crime. There is sufficiency of material not only in the order of rejection but it also emerges from the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge that petitioner has notoriety of being involved in many cases of serious nature. These are matters where trial should be taken to its logical end and privilege of bail should not be allowed. One fact which has been pointed out by the learned counsel representing the petitioner is that many a witnesses have been examined. If that is so, then the Court can presume that conclusion of trial will not take very long. The trial court shall ensure this. The prayer for bail is rejected. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)