o, t e: ' n Rajim, Ditict Raipur (CLG.) Versus e a u Harmesh Smgh Thakux , ' c ‘ , Ramndra S1ngh aged 47 yers, S/o RamJanam Singh Occpatlon 'Truk Dr1ver, R/o Hous of’ c e Changorabhatha D1str1t Rmpuj (C G) M/s. B.B. Bicks, through r ~’ a l ‘ r ' ist p The New Indla Insunce Co Ltd through D1v131onal Manager l ' ra _ Deepak Lalwani, aged 31 years, ‘ S/ Lae Kshumal ,Lalwani, R/o. Gaj Road, “Naya‘para, ‘ sr MA. (C) No. ' r gamgA 154 ?F‘ D1V1s1onal Office ‘1 Kachchari Chowk Ja11 Road Ralpur, Dstrict Ralpur (C G ) W‘ MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 ‘ OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT 1988 IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH ” ' AT BILASPUR V Managing Director, Bhat'hgaOn, Chowk, Poice‘ Station Purani Basti, Drict Raiur ‘ M’PELLANT Quilimant RI‘SPONDENTu ’ :1) Nyn apphcants (DRIVEI%9F31\\O Ease“ ’.. a HQ: ‘Lx 5:.- “ha-nu “mi 4.. u» n. (UWNBJR) :2) LN§URER H1GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A.§C¥ {Pm Ma NO. \E)é 3791 ) n OF 2010 Deepak Lalwani APPELLANT] CLAIMANT Versus Ramendra Singh and others. MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF TNE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT 1988 (Sinqie Bench: Hon'ble Mr. N.K. AqarwaL J.) Present : None for the appellant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 27‘“ day of January, 2011) None for the appeHant. 2. The matter is called twice. On both occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant may not be interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. M Sd/— N. K. Agarwal Judge /