IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.46 of 2006 DUDHESHWAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 06- 5.9.2008 Heard Mr. Ram Lallan Singh for the petitioner, Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Additional Advocate General No.3 for opposite party nos.1 and 2, and Mr. Ravindra Priyadarshi for opposite party nos.3 and 4 (Gaya Municipal Corporation). The petitioner of C.W.J.C. No.4165 of 2005 (Dudheshwar Singh Vs. The State of Bihar and others) has preferred the present application for review and/or modification of the order dated 8.8.2005, whereby the Gaya Municipal Corporation was directed to pay a sum of Rs.1,13,479/- inclusive of D.A. at the rate of 251 per cent to the petitioner. In the present review application, it has been stated that the said sum of Rs.1,13,479/- is an incorrect amount and the correct amount is Rs.1,42,356/- and, therefore, the said order dated 8.8.2005 may accordingly be modified. 2. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. It appears that the said sum of Rs.1,13,479/- was 2 incorporated in the order dated 8.8.2005 on the basis of the pleadings of the parties. The petitioner in his present review application has made a bald statement that the amount should have been Rs.1,42,356/- without giving any break-up at all and without giving details. The contention is rejected. It is, therefore, not possible to entertain this review application for enhancement of the claim of the petitioner on the basis of such a bald and unsubstantiated statement. I wish to record for the sake of completion of record, as submitted by learned counsel for the Corporation, that the petitioner has been paid D.A. at the rate of 295 per cent, instead of 251 per cent, with effect from August, 2003. 3. This application is accordingly rejected. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/