C.W.P.No. 1235 of 2010. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P.No. 1235 of 2010. Date of Decision: 11.5.2010. Hukam Singh and another -----Petitioner. VERSUS State of Haryana and others ---Respondents. CORAM : HON'BLE Mr. JUSTCE K.KANNAN. Present:- Mr. Sandeep Sharma,Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.R.D.Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent No.1. Ms. Shallic Taneja, Advocate, for Mr.Arun Walia, Advocate, for respondent No.2 and 3. 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? K.KANNAN,J. (ORAL) The prayer in the writ petition is to allot the C.W.P.No. 1235 of 2010. 2 plot to the petitioners under oustees' quota. It is submitted by the respondents that the claim of the petitioners is under active consideration of the Government. There is a formal denial in the written statement regarding entitlement. The petitioners plead that a great hardship is being faced as there are limited scope of consideration of their claim. In this view of the matter, I deem it appropriate that this matter be placed before the Oustees Lok Adalat on 21.5.2010 which is stated to have been constituted for the purpose of adjudication with regard to the claim of the petitioners' entitlement which shall be considered and appropriate orders passed within a reasonable period not exceeding 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. 11.5.2010 ( K.KANNAN) Anoop JUDGE