IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 4587 of 2009 Date of decision: 26.03.2010 Ramesh Kumar ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Saurabh Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Sura, Addl. A.G. Haryana for the respondent - State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that presently the custody of minor girl-Reena @ Sumitra is with the petitioner-Ramesh Kumar. In view of the above as well as in view of the order dated 19.03.2010 passed by this court in CRM M 601 of 2009 titled as 'Renna and another v. State of Haryana and another,' this petition is rendered as infurctuous. Dismissed as infructuous. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge March 26, 2010 mohan