IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.85 of 2009 RANA PRATAP SINGH SON OF SHRI MAHENDRA YADAV @ MAHENDRA NATH BAUDH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA ASHOK NAGAR, ROAD NO.2, P.S. KANKERBAGH, DISTRICT PATNA …….PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME ( POLICE), GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CABINET VIGILANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, DEPARTMENT OF VIGILANCE INVESTIGATION BUREAU, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATNA ….RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 11.02.2009 Learned Counsel for the petitioner, prays to implead the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna as respondent no.5 in the writ application. Let him do so in course of the day. Prayer of the petitioner in this writ application is to direct the Vigilence Investigation Bureau to take up the investigation of Kankarbagh P.S.case No.338 of 2008. It is the assertion of the petitioner that though there is no material connecting the petitioner with the crime, but final report is not being submitted. Having heard Mr.Rajesh Kumar Singh for the petitioner, G.A.VI for the State and Mr. C.M.Chaurasia for respondent no.3, I deem it expedient that respondent no.5, the Senior Superintendent of Police ensures completion of investigation of Kankarbagh P.S.case No.338 of 2008 without unnecessary delay. 2 I direct accordingly. It is made clear that I have not expressed any opinion in regard to the claim made by the petitioner and that is matter of investigation. Application stands disposed off with the observation aforesaid. Narendra/ (Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, ACJ.)