BA1 No. 57 of 2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Prem Kaushal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. R.S. Sammal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, A.G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the co-accused have been enlarged on bail, therefore, on the basis of parity, the applicant is also entitled to be enlarged on bail. The Court finds that the F.I.R. was lodged by the brother of the deceased. The Court finds that the applicant who is the husband of the deceased had not filed the F.I.R. which he could have done so since he was available. The co-accused who has been enlarged on bail is alleged to be the mistress of the applicant. In the light of the aforesaid and, without commenting anything further on the merit of the case, the court is of the opinion that the applicant is not entitled to be enlarged on bail at this stage. The bail application is rejected. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 29.04.2011 Shiv