B. ......^:;^3^- >'";^rt^"^\^- -3c"AT-;'.v't"" IN THE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WMT PETITION N0.». .^i /2006 ^I-^ ^%s^ ,G-<!','^'^R' Yogesh Kumar Kosariya, S/o- Late Pardeshi Ram Kosariya, Aged about 24 years, R/o- Village - Ashra, P.0. Khertha Bazar, Tehsil - Dondi Lohara, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. PETTTIONER VERSUS State ofChattisgarh, Through-Secretary, Deptt. OfGeneral Administration, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Secretary, Deptt. ofEducation, D.K.S. Bhawan, Maatralaya, Raipur, CG. 3. StateofMadhyaPradesh, Through-Secretary, Genera Administratibn Deptt., Secretariat- Bhopal, M.P. 2. .d^.i^''^'9 1cS?y^»''" »^ p^ fc<^* 5. ^"' District Education Officer, Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. Unionoflndia, Throgh-Director, Departmemt ofPersonnel, Training and Public Grievances, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, NewDelhi. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE coNSTmmoN OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI ETC. » XI-HC-22 •rsf '•^FTRra, ^'d'i'y'iia, firarey 311^1^.?. Rii.i* snl?f fa stiHi<=ti ^n^i '^-' t.... r ^^ ^J-f' _..^.:^..^.^.ml€^c: an^i ^(TOR:'gfgg 16-1-2006 ^TqfefTt^ •qra?fi 4 fs^t ^RZTC ^T3]fitT(T3n^T Petitioner by SIu-i Pankaj Sljrivastava, Advocate. Shri Vivek Shanna, Pauel L^wyer, for the State/respondents. Shri S.K, Beriwal, Sr. Panel Wifh: conscnt, heard finally. This ease relates to coinpas deafh ofan einployee serviug in fhje State. Leamed eounsel for the pe^itioner categoricaU^' stated that, fhe deatli of the einployee has occurred on earUer. It is furfher subinitted No, 1322/2002 mvolving fhe sami^ question Qrders have been passed by tfais Court on 20/12/2005. He prays case also. Leamed couasel for the states tbat the State of Chhattisi cases of dependaats of those en^ployees who died on or after 1/11/1997 strictlv ia accordance with fhe submits fhat four luoiiths tiuie foi In view offhe submissions parties, without expressuig fflay opinion of fhis Court, ends ofjus fhe State of Chhattisgarh and t| decide the case of fhe petitioner the tune ofdeath ofthe emiployee appoiatment orders wiU be issued| 31rt May, 2006. The petitioner is| fhe authorities. It is inade cle; petitioner inay avail the reinedy Copy to the State counselt order to the respondents for com]ji |Lawyer for the Union of India. siBnate appoiutaient consequent upon the 15-8-2000 i.e. after 1-11-1997 aad not that in batch of cases bearing W.P;. ffaat sinular orders niay be passed in ttas ate does not dispute the above fact aad ;arh has taken a decision to consider the jioUcy prevalent at fhat time. He however issuiug necessary orders niay be given. |made by leamed counsel appearing for the ^pinion on the nierits of the case, m. fhe (tice will be served if a direction. is given to be authorities concenied to consider and |in accordance wifh fhe poUcy prevalent at ;oncemed. If the petitioner fouud eUgible, as early as possible preferably on orbefore also dirccted to render due co-operatioa to ^r that if aay grievance stUl reinains, fhe: ^YaUable under the law iacluding filing of the petition before this Court. Wifh fhe aforesaid observat^ons, ttiis petition stands disposed of. Certided copy as per rules. wbo will be obUged td coininunicate the tiaace. Sd'- Fakhruddin Judge [^^figq