WPCRL No. 530 of 2010 With Stay Appl. No. 5373 / 10 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. S.K. Shandilya, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present for the State. Mr. Yogesh Pandey, Advocate and Mr. Karan Anand, Advocate, present for complainant / respondent No. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought quashing of the FIR dated 28.03.2010, registered as Crime No. 09 of 2010, relating to offences punishable under Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of I.P.C., with police station Rani Pokhari, Tehsil Rishikesh, District Dehradun. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the agreement of sale was entered between co-accused Gagan Joshi and the complainant. It is further pleaded that the petitioner is not the beneficiary of the agreement, nor the petitioner has received part amount of consideration. However, on going through the contents of the first information report, this Court finds that allegations as against the present petitioner Urvashi Kumari is that she signed as witness in a Will dated 30th June 1997 purporting to have been executed by one Ishwar Chand, who had already died in the year 1990, in Delhi. It is further alleged in the first information report that on the basis of said Will, co- accused Pushpa Prasad and Kamal Prasad are said to have got their names mutated in the property. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, in the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the investigation of the case. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily. (St ay Application No. 5373 of 2010 also stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 07.07.2010 HN