:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1481 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.1481 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.1481 OF 2007 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L) NO.691 OF 2006 (L) NO.691 OF 2006 (L) NO.691 OF 2006 IN IN IN ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.391 OF 2005 PETITION NO.391 OF 2005 PETITION NO.391 OF 2005 Skipper Foods Pvt. Ltd. ..Appellants Vs. Hindustan Unilever Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.S.J.Khera for the Appellants. Mr.N.H.Seervai, Senior Advocate with Sanjay Udeshi i/b.Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2008 : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2008 : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellants and the learned Senior Counsel for the Respondent. We have perused the Notice of Motion and the Affidavit-in-support thereof and other additional Affidavits. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellants are seeking condonation of 60 days delay in filing the above Appeal. However, the learned Senior Counsel for the Respondent states that there is a delay of 90 days. After perusal of the Affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion as well other additional Affidavits and the Affidavit-in-reply, we find sufficient cause to condone the delay caused in filing the above Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellants. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). :2: 2. Place the matter on board for admission on 22nd February, 2008, subject to numbering. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)