^6 '•-.I HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIV1SION BENCH Coram : HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEVGUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLESHR1SUNILKUMARSINHA,J. APPELLANT/ PETITIONER RESPONDENT WR1T APPEAL No. 77 of 2008 R.D. Mourya, aged 52 years, S/o Shri Pati Ram Mourya, working as Dy. S.P., at Police Headquarters, Durg, District - Durg(C.G.) Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Home, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) WRIT APPEL UNDER SECTION2 OFCHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEALTObMSIONBENCH)RULES,2006 Present; Shri TKTiwari,counselforthe appeilant. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Government Advocate Tor the State / respondent. JUDGEMENT (27th March, 2009) The following judgment of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: Learned counsel for the parties are heard on admission. 2) Appellant RD Mourya has filed this writappeat against the impugned order dated 14.11 .2008 passed in WP(S) No.6329/2CX)8. 3) The appellant in the writ petition had challenged the order dated 18.09.2008, whereby the appellant's representation agalnst his transfer was dismissed. 4) Appellant RD Mourya, working as Deputy Superintendent of Police at Poliee Head Quarters, Durg vras transferred vide order dated 20.08.2008 as SDOP, Dist Narayanpur. The said order of sfl ^ transfer was challenged by the petitioner in WP(S) No.4792/2008 which was disposed of vide order dated 02.09.^)08 with liberty to the petitioner to file representation against his transfer before the concemed authorities with a direction to the concerned authorities to decide the same within a period of two weeks. it was in compliance of the order dated 02.09.2008 that the petitioner's representation was considered and decided by the authorities vide order dated 18.09.2008. 5) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for theparties and the reasonings given in the impugned order by the learned Single Judge, we do not find any inflrmity either in the order dated 18.09.2008, wherebythe appellant's representation against his transfer was dismissed orin the impugned order dated 14.11.2008, whereby the learned Single Judge declined to interfere in the matterof petitioner's transfer from Durg to Narayanpur. 6) The writ appeal, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- SUNB, KUMAR SlNHA Judge padma