IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 105 of 2008 (D/B) Sumit Sharma …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ..…. Respondents Ms. Anjali Noliyal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for respondent No. 3. Coram: Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Ms. Anjali Noliyal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for respondent No. 3. 2. This writ petition has been filed for seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the F.I.R. in Case Crime No. 767 of 2007 u/s 366 I.P.C.. 3. The respondents have filed a short counter affidavit in which it has been alleged that the matter has already been investigated and the police after completion of the investigation have come to the conclusion that there is no sufficient evidence in support of the allegations made in the F.I.R. and as such, the police is likely to submit a final report before the court concerned in the near future. The learned Addl. G.A. submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous as the police is likely to submit final report before the court concerned in the near future. 4. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 5. Interim order dated 07.02.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the final report before the court concerned. (Dharam Veer, J.) (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 17.04.2008 17.04.2008 Shiv