HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2508 of 2009 Order: Heard both sides. The petitioner, who is the defendant filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia seeking to assail the correctness of the order dismissing the application filed under Order 16 Rule 5 read with Section 151 C.P.C. seeking to summon the original agreement of lease dated 21/1/1976 from the State Bank of Hyderabad. The Court below did not find favour with the petitioner’s request and dismissed the said application, by the impugned order on the ground that if the petitioner feels that the said document is essential, the petitioner can as well obtain the same and produce it before the Court. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record. It is quite apparent from the record that that the petitioner has got reply from the State Bank of Hyderabad on 24.3.2006, through which, the bank has already furnished certified copy of the said agreement duly certifying it as true copy of the original agreement of lease. When such certified copy has been issued by the bank, it is not known as to why such a document has not been filed by the petitioner before the court below, especially when there is no objection with regard to marking of such a document. Under the circumstances, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. The revision petition fails and it is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ B. PRAKASH RAO,J Date: 10th March, 2011 pnb