{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 901 OF 2010 Reshma Vaibhav Ingle & Another PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.V.P.Golewar, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. N.R.Shaikh, APP for respondents State ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 30 th September 2010 PER COURT: 1. This is a petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, by which the petitioners pray for the reliefs at prayer clause B & C, which are as follows : B- The respondents Superintendent of Police Ahmednagar and Pune may please be directed to intervene in the matter of petitioners and by giving suitable advise or by taking suitable legal action against the parents, relatives and villagers of village Mohi, Post-Kural, Tq-Khed, Dist-Pune, the disputes in respect of relations of the petitioners with them be settled amicably and to take further suitable legal {2} action to protect the lives and personal liberties of the petitioners by issuing appropriate writ, order or directions. C- By issuing writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the like nature, the respondents may please be directed to register crime / offence against the concerned as per the complaints of the petitioners and by making investigation into the same stern action against the concerned may be initiated and they may be punished in accordance with the provisions of law in order to protect lives and liberty of petitioners and in-laws and parents of the respective petitioners.” 2. The reliefs, which the petitioners have prayed for, cannot be granted to the petitioners, as no writ, in the nature of the relief which is sought for, can be issued to the police officers in respect of registration of the offence. The petitioners have alternate remedy of filing a private complaint. Such a relief as prayed for is not available to the petitioners in the light of the judgments of the Supreme Court in the matter of “Aleque Padamsee V/s Union of India (2007) 7 SCC 171 and “Sakri Vasu V/s State of U.P.” AIR 2008 SC 907. In that light of the matter, the petition is summarily dismissed with no order as to costs. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/B10/cwp901-10