1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.3418 OF 2009. RAMESH BALIRAMJI AGAME MANGRULPIR, DISTT. WASHIM. .. PETITIONER/S. // VERSUS // 1. MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN. THROUGH DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, YAVATMAL. 2. MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN. THROUGH DIVL.TRAFFIC SUPERINTENDENT (DEFAULT), YAVATMAL, DISTT. YAVATMAL. .. RESPONDENT/S. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Shri N.R.Saboo, Advocate for Petitioner. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : AUGUST 13, 2009. 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file reply before the Disciplinary Authority. 2. The petition is, therefore, disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. 2 3. The Disciplinary Authority shall not be influenced by the observation of the Industrial Court while considering the reply. The order, if any, that the employer may pass, would not be implemented for a period of one week after it is served upon the petitioner. The petitioner would be at liberty to file reply to the show cause notice within a period of ten days from today. JUDGE RR.