^F-/ -^T5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.S. No. /10 PETITIONER Manau Ram Yadaw,S/o Late Kudan Ram, aged about 42 years, Choukidar, Gramya Bhariti Vidyapith, Hardi Bazar, Korba (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ '? ^ *b'y^<0>y ^ <,;'•" 1. State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretary, Department ofHigher Education, D.K.S. Bhawaa Raipur (C.G.) / 2. Director, Higher Education, Directorate Raipur (C.G.) 3. Shashtri Shikshan Samiti, Through its Secretary,Gramya Bharti Vidyapith (Mahavidyalaya) Hardi Bazar, Korba (C.G.) ^? WRIT PETITIONUNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HiGHcoTOrT^wcaBHATTiscy^mi^a^^ SB: mMwt.K^imeaffljWnGESKrtmisBss.^wKKKssR !'-.w,^.(iEttti^:ii7iSiiiwi:!:^;::/.^f-1 PBTTTIONER MaaanRamYaaaro ':Vers»lsr • ', • ; : ' ' :..- . RJBSPOmWMTS StatetrfaQ.&Ofhers WRITPICTn>IONUNDBRARri©tA226QrTHBG<M»SriarotK»l ':wsss^e^&.^'.'.:::' .::.-. ':;': ' Sli^Nee^ CUoub^^ C(^^ Sliriy.V.S.RBortIt^l^A.Cn^ais^Sla^i^ps.l&a^ •i • - : -: GSSDSR \ ,] (OT.tO.SKtlQt "Gnevan^; lIle^ejBti^fir^^ he iS:Bie eanplit^^; ^ Inistitutma and fhcmgh toje^^ Coin.Hiisaton as recpmiBetultxl 1^':ffi^' ? tBe gcwenimentemploycesliutfhesam^l^n^ AceorEliug to fhfi petttioaer eaxlier also wfaen t^ Pay CQHiaaissicmw^ re&sed t& petition^ sind smiite^ persons, wnt petitions 'sreis^^ ^ toefiMe this (3ourt^^^^s^ ultiinate^ afteT passii^ ofoid^^ "fl^ Pay Comnussipnwas grautect to them. 2. Couasel fbr ttifi pct|itioner s^ thaf enfls ofjns^ce wbuM be served if ^ fKis s1®geffl withdraw liiis petttion aBl.iKdlreGM(>iuiibe isg'iaed 1»fye aeSpolid.cat N0.1 for decidia^ the pemimg repiesfentatKna of tUe petitioaw (Aimexure P/ 5) dated 11.6.2010. 3. Ccmnsel ErRpeariiog fi>r •thje Stafe ts?uBiiu^?ItB^i^ repBeseateticm h^ iBcea.made l^ ffle^^ietittaaeridi^ Chicf..Mims^'w^rea |:Ue|^^'i3Gcp^^ repiesentatioB to respoade^ N0. iyHe;iSubm^ •ttt|it| &eSss ofj Mii |i"i^Jli-^.^i-'i] i{a»ii»«..JK"".-i»"-^.::f.»«».1, fhe petitioner aad sinularly placed persons for graat of 6th Pay Cominission is already iinder consideration and let the petitioner inake a fresh representation aud the sanie would be decided in accordaace with law. 4. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw fhis petition with the aforesaid Uberty. In fhe eventuality of fiting a fi-esh representation by tbe petitioner before the respondent N0.1 within a period of one nioafh froia the date of receiut of copy of this order, it is expected froni the said authorities to pass appropriate order as expeditiously as possible preferably wifhia a period offour months fiioni the date ofits receipt 5. It is made clear fhat this Court has not expressed any opiaion on inerits of fhe case and fhe aufhorily conceraed would be at Uberty to decide the saxue strictly ta accordauce with law. —_-__ Sd/- Pririnker Diwakar Judge