hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2477 OF 2011 Sudhakar A. Shetty ... Petitioner Versus B.M.C. and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Pratap Patil, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni with Ms. P.A. Purandare for B.M.C. CORAM : P.B. MAJMUDAR & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 28, 2011 P.C. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with a liberty to file appropriate civil suit for the reliefs as prayed for. Hence, petition is allowed to be withdrawn with a liberty as prayed for. At this stage it is requested on behalf of the petitioner that since the canteen in question is running since long, the Corporation may be directed not to take any coercive steps for the period of two weeks from today. On behalf of the Corporation, the learned counsel states that since the petitioner wants to file civil suit, 1 hvn for the period of two weeks from today, status quo as of today shall be maintained by the Corporation. It is clarified that granting of status quo for the period of two weeks from today should not mean that the court has found that there is any prima facie case in favour of the petitioner. It is for the appropriate court to consider whether any relief can be granted to petitioner or not if any Notice of Motion is placed into service for interim reliefs. With the above observations, petition disposed of. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (P.B. MAJMUDAR,J.) 2