THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2969 of 2011 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. There is no appearance in spite of service of notice on the respondent/plaintiff. Petitioners are the defendants in O.S.No.176 of 2008 on the file of the learned V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal. The said suit filed for recovery of money was decreed by ex parte decree, dated 15.12.2009. It is stated that to set aside the said ex parte decree, the petitioners filed I.A.No.1200 of 2009, which in turn, was allowed on 11.02.2011 on their payment of costs of Rs.500/- on or before 28.02.2011. It is further stated that as the amount of costs was not deposited, I.A.No.146 of 2011 was filed seeking enlargement of time granted in order, dated 11.02.2011. When the said I.A. is pending consideration, the respondent filed E.P.No.129 of 2011 for execution of decree, dated 15.12.2009, by attaching the salary of the petitioners. In the said E.P., the petitioners filed E.A.No.71 of 2011 seeking stay of all further proceedings in the E.P.. The Court below by order, dated 27.06.2009, allowed the E.A. conditionally, by directing the petitioners to deposit half of the decretal amount in the Court. In this Civil Revision Petition, it is submitted that though ex parte decree was set aside by order, dated 11.02.2011, and further, I.A.No.146 of 2011 filed for enlargement of time is pending consideration, there is no reason for imposing the condition on the petitioners to deposit half of the decretal amount, in the impugned order. In this case, it is to be noticed that decree, dated 15.12.2009 is ex parte in nature and the said decree was passed on the date when the matter was coming up for cross-examination of P.W.1. In any event, it is also to be noticed that I.A.No.1200 of 2009 filed by the petitioners was allowed by setting aside the ex parte decree on payment of costs of Rs.500/-. As the costs were not paid, I.A.No.146 of 2011 was filed for enlargement of time and the same is pending consideration, as such, the Court below should not have imposed any condition on the petitioners, in the impugned order, while allowing E.A.No.71 of 2011. For the aforesaid reasons, the condition imposed on the petitioners in the impugned order to the extent of their depositing half of the decretal amount, is hereby set aside with the direction to the learned V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal, to decide I.A.No.146 of 2011, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of two (2) months from today. However, it is open to the respondent to take further steps for disposal of I.A.No.146 of 2011. Subject to the above, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 10th OCTOBER, 2011. kvni