1 s3676-96.sxw pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Suit No. 3676 of 1996 Smt. Sushilabai D. Dhanwantay & Ors. .. Plaintiffs v/s. Smt.Sumantidevi M. Dhanwantay & Ors. ..Defendants Ms.S.M.Parmar i/b.Daphtary Ferrera & Diwan for the Plaintiff Nos.1 to 8 Mr.Keval Shah i/b. Khaitan & Jaikar for the Plaintiff No.9. Ms.Leena Shah i/b/ Niranjan & Co. for the Defendant Nos.3 and 4 CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 18th April, 2011 P.C. : 1. Learned Counsel Mrs. S.M.Parmar, who is appearing on behalf of the plaintiff states that inspite of contacting the plaintiff, plaintiff is not responding and according to her she has no instructions in the matter and she has disposed of the property in question to the applicant in the Chamber Summons No.1219 of 2008. It is noticed that Chamber Summons No.1219 of 2008 was taken out by the applicants, namely M/s. Vedant Property Pvt. Ltd., for being joined as plaintifs and for 2 s3676-96.sxw some other reliefs. That Chamber Summons was decided by Order dated 1.10.2008. The said Chamber Summons was granted in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c). Amendment was to be carried out within period of six weeks from 1.10.2008. This will mean that the suit was required to be amended to show applicant M/s. Vedant Property Pvt. Ltd. Since then during the permitted period amendment has not been carried out, even thereafter also the amendment is not carried out. Nearly two and half years have passed. On the last occasion order was passed that the suit is likely to be dismissed. 2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submitted that some more time be given for carrying out the amendment. It must be mentioned that sufficient time is given. I see no reason to grant any more indulgence as no effective steps are taken in the matter. Hence following order is passed. ORDER Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]