IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 1567 of 2007 Date of decision: 11.3.2010 State of H.P. & Others ……….Petitioners Versus Atma Ram ……….Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, J. Whether approved for reporting?1No For the petitioners : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. A.G. with Mr. P.K. Sharma, Additional A.G. For the respondent : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate. Dev Darshan Sud, J. (Oral) The State has challenged the legality of the order of Administrative Tribunal passed in OA No. 2728/2003. While disposing of the petition, the Tribunal directed:- “For the aforesaid reasons, the present application is allowed and the respondents are directed to appoint the applicant as work charged as and when he has completed 10 years of service within minimum of 240 days in each calendar year with all consequential benefits within a period of three months from the receipt of copy of this order. In the light of above the present original application stands finally disposed of. No order as to costs.” We do not find that this direction is contrary to the ratio of judgment in Mool Raj Upadhyaya & others vs. State of H.P. & others, (1994) 2 SRL 377 which has been reaffirmed in State of H.P. & others vs. Gehar 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes 2 Singh (Civil Appeal No. 1037/2007, decided on 27.2.2007 and pursuant to which the state has framed schemes/policies for granting work charged status as also regularization of services of its employees. It is undisputed that these schemes/policies are being implemented uniformly. There is thus no merit in this petition, which is dismissed. No order as to costs. All interim orders are vacated. All miscellaneous applications are disposed of. (Dev Darshan Sud), J. (Kuldip Singh), J. March 11, 2010 (vs)