IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 1655 of 2008. Decided on: 15.6.2011. __________________________________________________________ Neelam Rani … Petitioner. Versus The State of H.P. and others. … Respondents. __________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Dinesh Bhanot, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Himmat Negi, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.4. Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Advocate for respondent No.5. __________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral). CMP No. 461 of 2010: Allowed as prayed for. CWP No. 1655 of 2008: The petition is filed with the following prayer:- “It is therefore respectfully prayed the present writ petition may kindly be allowed and the respondents may kindly be directed by issuance of a writ of mandamus by directing the respondents to accord their permission for the promotion of the petitioner to the post of Lecturer (English) along with all other consequential benefits including her seniority and arrears of salary alongwith interest @ 9% p.a. in the interest of justice and fair play.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has been actually working as Lecturer for the last eleven years, no remuneration has been paid so far. Apparently, there is dispute with regard to the grant-in-aid. In the nature of order, we propose to pass in this case, in light of the submission made by the petitioner, we do not think it necessary to go into various factual details. The petitioner may file an appropriate and comprehensive representation before the first respondent within a 2 period of three weeks from today, in which case the first respondent will look into the matter with notice to the petitioner and respondents No. 4 and 5 and the appropriate action in accordance with law, justice and equity shall be taken by the first respondent within another three months. It is made clear that while passing the orders, as above, the precedence in the matter shall also be adverted to, so that the petitioner may not have any grievance of discrimination. Depending upon orders thus passed by the first respondent, in case the petitioner is found eligible for any benefits to be granted either by the Government or by the Management, the same shall be disbursed to the petitioner within another one month, by the respective parties. 3. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. (Justice V.K. Sharma) June 15, 2011. Judge. (cr/pankaj)