Civil Revision No. 6639 of 2009 (O&M) 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 6639 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.11.2009 Naresh Kumar ......petitioner Versus Hari Singh and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Munish Mittal, Advocate. for the petitioner. **** SABINA, J. Plaintiff-respondent No.1 Hari Singh filed a suit for rendition of account and for dissolution of the firm. The petitioner, after closing his evidence, filed an application for permission to get the signatures of the plaintiff compared on the agreement. Vide the impugned order dated 27.10.2009, the said application was dismissed by the trial Court, Hence, the present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in case the petitioner is not allowed to get the signatures of the plaintiff Civil Revision No. 6639 of 2009 (O&M) 2 compared on the agreement, the petitioner would suffer an irreparable loss. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the instant petition is devoid of any merit and deserves dismissal. The petitioner had made a reference of the agreement dated 6.5.2003 in the written statement filed by him. When the plaintiff appeared in the witness box, he denied the execution of the agreement Ex.D-3. In these circumstances, the learned trial Court rightly held that the defendant was aware of the fact that the plaintiff had denied his signatures on agreement Ex.D-3 and should have got the same compared from an handwriting and finger print expert, while leading his evidence. Now the petitioner has closed his evidence voluntarily on 2.4.1999. The petitioner had failed to establish that despite due diligence he could not examine the handwriting and finger print expert, while he was leading his evidence. Hence, the impugned order does not suffer from any material irregularity and illegality warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. (SABINA) JUDGE November 13, 2009 anita