^Ti cro BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OFCHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. (S) No. 146&1 /2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS : ^y <?y/ <?<6>'"' {>»-' ..."^-- Smt. Prabha Mandavi, W/o. Dev Prasad Mandavi, aged about 44 years, Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School Mohgaon, Sankul B-Charbhata, Block-Chhuriya, Dist. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. '. District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Block - Chhuriya District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRITPETITION U/A 226 OF THECONSTITUTION OFINDIA ..€^r 'I^'!^f> ir Aa- kt)' p HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (Hoa'ble Mr. Justice Pritta&er Diwaher) Wrlt Petitlon (Sj No. 4681/2009 PBTITIONER RESPONDBNTS Smt. Prabha Mandavi Versus State of Chhattisgarh 8s Others Shri Avinash Chand Sahu, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Amrito Das, P.L. for the State. WRIT PBTITION UKDER ARTICU; 226 Of THB CONSTITUTION OF mpiA ORDBR I2S.8.20091 With the consent of thecounsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. The petitioner is aggrieved by the non-payment of two advance increments for having obtained D.Ed Examination certificate at her own expenses in the year 2000. Counsel for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and question of law involved in the present case are the same to that of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another reported in {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 3.4.2006. Subsequently, in Writ Petition No. (S) 4130/2005 in.the matter of (Gopesh Kumar Verma Vs. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh &Another) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15.12.2006, pyrsuant to the memo dated 24.12.1998, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopa] and the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the norhenclature of the Basic Training Institute i.e. BTJ has been changed and /•enamed as Diploma in Education i.e. D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. certiEcate holders are alsocovered by the decision in W.P.(S) No. 4130/2005 (supra). ; ^^ ^AMa^uInla -/PS.',.,;.;;> ! •S^SOO O^SB JSpJO 0{j •^OU JO S1U31U3JOUI SOUBApB OMl pred ussq s-eq sqs jgqisqa jsqunj pue 666T'e'l P"®866T'SI'-bS ps^p J^inojio sqi jsd s^ sssusdxs UMO jsq 4B 3'}'eoijiiJ30 uopBuiurexs 'pg'a psjmboB s'eq jauoi^Rsd sq^ jsq^sqM o^ SB SIOBJ sq-} jo uopBOljuaA o-) ^osfqns (Bjdns) feapjBL[g jeiun^ liieMqs^^ jo aseo sqi ui psss'ed jspjo aqt jo suus^ ui paf&oye si uoppsd }UA aq^. 'AiSuipjoooy 3~fs"^s