IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 919 of 2003 Date of Decision : March 08, 2010 Thakur Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present : Mr. K.S.Chahal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Sidhu, Additional Advocate General, Punjab T.P.S. MANN, J. (Oral) The petitioners were tried for offences under Sections 326/324/323/34 IPC on the allegations that on 16.2.2007 all of them caused injuries to Harnek Singh. Vide judgment and order dated 18.12.2001, learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Faridkot, convicted and sentenced them as follows:- (i) Thakur Singh U/S 326 IPC To undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. (ii) Jagtar Singh) Thana Singh) U/Ss 326/34 IPC To undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year each. Crl. Revision No. 919 of 2003 (iii) Jagtar Singh U/S 324 IPC To undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for two months. (iv) Thana Singh) Thakur Singh) U/Ss 324/34 IPC To undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months each. (v) Thana Singh U/S 323 IPC To undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months. (vi) Thakur Singh) Jagtar Singh) U/Ss 323/34 IPC To undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months each. All the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently. Aggrieved of their conviction and sentences, the petitioners filed an appeal. The same was, however, dismissed by learned Sessions Judge, Faridkot on 9.4.2003 except for modifying the sentence of imprisonment imposed upon Thakur Singh-petitioner under Section 326 IPC by reducing it from three years to two years. Thereafter, they filed the present revision in this Court, which was admitted on April 25, 2005. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that all the petitioners have already completed their substantive sentences of imprisonment. They had also paid the fine imposed upon them by the learned trial Court. After being released from custody, none of the petitioners has contacted him nor he has received any instructions to prosecute the revision. Accordingly, he does not want to press the present revision. - Crl. Revision No. 919 of 2003 In view of the above, the present revision is, hereby, dismissed as not pressed. ( T.P.S. MANN ) March 08, 2010 JUDGE ajay-1 -