IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.77750-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: FEBRUARY 9, 2007 Smt.Paramjeet Kaur and others ...PETITIONERS VERSUS State of Haryana ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr.Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.S.S.Mor, Sr.DAG, Haryana. ... The petitioners apprehending their arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No.518 dated 16.8.2005 registered under Sections 498- A/406/452/506 IPC at Police Station City Gurgaon, have filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail. While issuing notice of motion on December 12, 2006, the arrest of the petitioners was stayed subject to their joining the investigation. I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR. Counsel for the petitioners contends that about five years after the death of husband, false FIR has been lodged by the wife against the petitioners, who are her mother-in-law, brothers-in-law and sisters-in-law. Counsel contends that for three times, the investigation was conducted by different officers and all of them found the allegations to be false. Counsel for the petitioners further contends that in terms of the interim order dated December 12, 2006, all the petitioners have joined the investigation. Counsel contends that during the pendency of this petition, the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement and the petitioners have also filed a petition for quashing the FIR. The complainant, who is present in the court and identified by Satnarayan-Investigating Officer, also confirms the amicable settlement between the parties. Crl.Misc.No.77750-M of 2006 -2- In view of the above, the interim order dated December 12, 2006 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions. Disposed of accordingly. February 9, 2007 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE