Ifeffl C^l! IN THE HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) W.P. (S) No. TL1^2—^2010 PETITIONER ^^ \A< V ^"Py<J^><> ^\^"" ^•'[^^''~ ^" \^'sv'^.-"" \^'" RESPQNDENTS ^ Chabinarayan Sahu, S/o. Shri Jagannath Sahu, aged about 35 years, R/o. Post - Nagri, Tahsil - Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS ^ (1) State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretaiy, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) V,^^. (2) Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division (Samanya), Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) (3) Depot Officer, offlce of Depot Officer (forest), Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA STT^T^T f<riich sn^r 5h^i<=h ^f^a '^sr ^||<4H<4, ^T{I^JI<^< rGi<ni^y SIT^T 'q^r^ ...W-..e.:...a,.)..^-^ 'fq^sr' ^W<r\{ $h+<ich 3^1 "^FrTT^ ^rf^T 8.B.: HON»BLBJU8TICB MR. PK|ITINKER DIWAKER 07-^12-2010. Shri Vinod Deshniukh, Shri Vaibhav Goverdhao., P coir|isel for the petitioiier. |L. for the State. Grievaiice of the petitioner fhough he is entiUed for his Guard, he has been regularized o: i^gu^arizatlo Counsel for the petitioner have coDapleted all fhe formalities) favour of the petitioner and therel xnay be permitted to withdraw tibji to file a fresh reprcsentation bej same may be directed to be deci(f expeditiously as possible. siibitiits Counsel for fhe State the fact he cannot xaake any Gtovemxnent is wiSImg to regularizji on the post of Forest Guard 4 objection if the petitioner makes authority concemed and fhe accordaace witli law. Accordiagly, fhe petition i fhat ia the event of aay before respondent No/2 raisiag represe^itat^ chl^id^1r< WR^f ^ 'ftcst <F31^K ^ 3:rP<W ^TT^T iii fhe present petition is that adzation ou the post of Forest fhe post ofwatchiD^an. ^ubmits that tibie respondents |for passiag necessary order ia |)re at fhis stage fhe petitioner present petition with Uberty [ore respondent No,2 aiid flie ted ia accordance wifh law as fhat wifhoiit ascertamiag fetateiaent whefher fhe State the services of the petitioner ^r not. However, he has no a representation before fhe |same is decided by it ia disposed of wifh a direction itation filed by fhe petitioner his grievaaces, fhe saine is [Tit^ S.f<^4 .:< 'A.^ ~5^ -^||<L||d<LI. ^-dl^4!^, ^cni^y '^^^^ ^W^\\ 5bN|Ct> siri^r xra^ ^..(^)....MK:^y^f^ ra?""^""""""""""""""^t 20 •^^T' 3^T^T f<rii<=h STT^T 5t)^ich ^f^a 3?IT^?T ^^TT^R ^Tf^T expected to be decided by accordaace with law as expeditioi^sly \he authority concerDed iii as possible. It is xaade clear fhat fhis opinion on nierits of fhe case would be at Uberty to decide fhe i| starictly in accordance with law. <=M<Ll{<n<flrl iTTR^ff ^ ft^l" ipsi^K ^T 37f^R STT^T Court has not expressed aay and the aufhority concemed ppresentation ofthe petitioner Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge [^ifi^