IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision 6656 of 2007. Date of Decision: 04th March, 2008. Mukhtiar Singh ....Petitioner through Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate Versus Punjab State Warehousing Corporation & Anr. ...Respondents through Mr. ADS Sukhija, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT,J.(ORAL) This order shall dispose of Civil Revision Nos. 6656 and 6671 of 2007 as common questions of law and fact are involved. For the sake of brevity, the facts have been taken from Civil Revision NO. 6656 of 2007. The petitioner has filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the respondent-defendants from effecting recovery from his salary on the basis of an order dated 9.3.2007 passed by the Managing Director of the Punjab State Warehousing Corporation. Along with the suit, the plaintiff also moved an application under Order 39 Ruels 1 and 2 CPC for the grant of ad-interim injunction. The aforesaid application, however, was dismissed by the learned trial Court vide its order dated 30.8.2007 and the appeal filed against the afore-stated order was also dismissed by learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh vide order dated 12.11.2007. Aggrieved, the petitioner has filed this revision petition. The petitioner has placed reliance upon certain judgments passed by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction whereby recovery from the similarly situated persons has been stayed till the disposal of their appeals by the statutory Appellate Authority. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration all the attending circumstances including the fact that recoveries can still be made from the petitioner in the event of failure of his statutory appeal, these revision petitions are allowed to the extent that the interim order dated 20.12.2007 passed by this Court whereby recovery from the petitioner was stayed, is made absolute during the pendency of the 'departmental appeal' filed by the petitioner before the Appellate Authority, i.e., the Executive Committee of the Corporation. However, in the facts and circumstances of this case, the Appellate Authority is directed to dispose of the pending appeal as early as possible and not later than four months. Disposed of. March 04, 2008. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE