( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2023 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1170 OF 1991 Hari s/o Mahipati Ghodke APPLICANT VERSUS The Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Bench Aurangabad & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. P.G. Godhamgaonkar, advocate for the applicant. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 16th February, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard counsel. 2. The petition is old one and was dismissed due to absence of the counsel. It is submitted that the absence was unintentional. The counsel further submits that he was engaged in another Court at the relevant time. Considering the explanation given in the application, the dismissal order dated 28-01-2010 is recalled and the petition is restored to its original ( 2 ) position. It be enlisted for final hearing on 22nd February, 2010. The civil application is accordingly allowed. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/ca2023-2010