1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5202 OF 1998 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. U.B.Bondar, Advocate for petitioner. M.B. Vaishanav, Advocate holding for Mr. P.V. Mandlik, Advocate for respondent no.2. ............................ CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE: 03/08/2010 PER COURT : 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 19/9/1998, vide which the appeal filed by respondent no. 4 came to be allowed by respondent no. 3. 2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner was appointed as daily wager on 18/3/1983, whereas respondent no. 4 was appointed on 15/11/1983. According to the petitioner, since he was senior, he was rightly granted permission as Grader by the A.P.M.C. 2 3. The order of the appellate authority would reveal that the entry of the petitioner in the cadre of Jr. Clerk is on 29/4/1988, whereas that of respondent no. 4 is on 19/3/1988. It can thus be seen that in the cadre of Jr. Clerk, respondent no. 4 is senior to the petitioner. For promotion to higher cadre, seniority list in the cadre of Jr. Clerk would be relevant. 4. In that view of the matter, no error is found in the impugned order. No interference by this Court is warranted. The petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA ] [ B.R. GAVAI ] JUDGE JUDGE knp/WP 5202.98