C ^' ien-5'- s> IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.IS) N0^ cs> 31^ /2009 PETITIONER ?c"!^Aw5s^!:.^ yicsaft"'" ^y-'" tew4-'" RESPONDENTS sy "<^.. / Hari Singh Rana, S/o Late Shri D.S.Rana, Aged about 46 years, R/o Industrial Training Institute Bastar, Distt.Bastar-(C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Department of Technical Education, Janshakti Niyojan, Science 8s Technology D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Under Secretary, Departraent of Technical Education, Janshakti Niyojan, Science. & Technology D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITIOJUJNDER^ARTICLE 22^0F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OFJ^ WRITL IN THE NATURl^OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER ^^ •y T5E( ^i.iiid'4, ytflyis, fqyi'Hy ..^.:£:..Ql.....^.^.l. •gsi-BT^Tt'aiiiN? ^mTCR ^;j%-d 3n^ SB : HOH'BI^TSHtU >JUSrK;t!; rtUTtHRBK U1WAK1SK. 29.07.2009 Shri Sunil Otwani, couns Shri Yashwant Singh pass^d forithe nc}t olFfice Challenge in the 30.6.2009 (Annexure P/1) petitioner who is working as CivU) has been transferred from) Distt. Bastar to Industrial Train|n Contention of counsel he is transferred, there does further as the petitioner is the transferred. Contention of counsel make a representation to the re^i decided in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petitipn petitioner to make a froin the date of receipt of the be decided by the authority preferably within a further receipt. ^I for the petitioner. Thafcur, Dy. A.G. forthe State. prese|-it petitfon is to the order dated by respondent N0.2 by which the Training Officer Grade II (Draftsnan Industrial Training institute, Bastar, Train|ng Institute, Bijapur. petitioner is that the place where esdst the post of the petitioner and bearer he ought not to have faeen fdr representyion cppy con<temed peri<|)d ^I^feRh 'WTCTf ^? f^t •l.^T^K the State is that let the petitioner pondent No.2 and the saine would be s disposed of with a direction to the within a period of fifteen days of this order and the same -would strictly in accordance with law, of three weeks froin the date of its Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge