1 MNM IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4541 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant (Orig.Complainant) Vs. Ramchandra Maruti Mahadik ...Respondent (Orig.Accused) Mrs.R.V.Newton, A.P.P for the State Mr.Shitalkumar Kamble h/f. Mr. Umesh Mankapure Advocate for Respondent CORAM: SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED: 14TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C. 1.The Appeal is filed against the acquittal upon the charges framed under Section 3(1)(x) of the Atoricites Act and under Section 7(i)(d) of the Civil Rights Act and under Sections 323, 304 and 506 of the I.P.C. The evidence of P.W.2 and 3 who are both friends and friends of the complainant show that they had peeped into the office where the accused was abusing and 2 assaulting the complainant. However, the complainant himself has not stated about the abuses as well as the presence of these two witnesses. Consequently, the very basis of the prosecution case is falls. Hence, the acquittal cannot be faulted. 2.Leave to appeal is refused. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.)