WP(C) 1261/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ASOK POTSANGBAM Heard Mr. B.Gogoi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. A.Deka, learned Standing Counsel, Education Deptt. Appearing for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. When the matter is taken up, the learned counsel appearing for t he petitioners has fairly submitted that a similar nature of case i.e. WP(C) No . 1160/2011 was disposed of by this Court on 3.3.2011 by holding that with regar d to the proposed action of the Managing Committee, which is a private entity, w rit does not lie but the petitioners therein are granted liberty to take any ava ilable legal action for redressal of their grievances. The learned counsel prays that this writ petition may also be disposed of accordingly. In the instant case, this Court is of the opinion that the action to be taken by the Respondent No.7, Managing Committee of the School, a private ent ity, falls within the realm of private law and in absence of any element of publ ic law, a writ does not lie. However, considering the grievances of the petition ers and prejudice likely to be sufferred by them, I think the petitioners shall be granted liberty to take appropriate legal action for redressal of their grie vances in accordance with law. With the above observations, the writ petition stands dispose d of. It is made clear that the Deputy Commissioner, Sonitpur District shall be at liberty to dispose of the representation dated 26.4.2010 received f rom the petitioners by issuing a speaking order.