IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No. 590 of 2011 Date of Decision: March 16, 2011 Chhote ..... Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and others. .....Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Ms. Sangeeta Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raja Sharma, AAG, Haryana for respondent-State. ***** JORA SINGH, J (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus with a roving writ for the release of detenues as mentioned in Para No. 5 of the petition from the illegal custody of respondents No.4 to 7. Learned State counsel has filed reply by way of affidavit of Chander Prakash, District Magistrate, Jhajjar and the same is taken on record. Reply is to the effect that none of the alleged detenue was found to be in illegal custody of respondents No.4 to 7. It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the present petition has become infructuous as all the alleged detenues have since been released. In view of the abvoesaid reply and statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, no further action is required to be taken at this stage. Hence, the present petition has become infructuous and is dismissed accordingly. March 16, 2011 (JORA SINGH) sham JUDGE