IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY, TWO THOUSAND TEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5714 of 2010 Between: Joseph Sriharsha Mary Indraja Educational Society Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad. … Petitioner And Union of India, rep., by its Secretary, Human Resources Development, New Delhi & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri K.V.K. Rao This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5714 of 2010 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent inlaying down norms and standards for courses, curricula, physical and instructional facilities, staff pattern, staff qualifications, quality instructions, assessment and examinations and in fixing norms and guidelines for charging tuition and other fees and in providing guidelines for admission of students to technical institutions so as to augment the norms of standards for courses of Technical Education by exercising the powers under Section 10(1)(i), Section 10(1)(j) as well as Section 10(1)(o) of the All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to lay down norms and standards for courses, curricula, physical and instructional facilities, staff pattern, staff qualifications, quality instructions, assessment and examinations, fix norms and guidelines for charging tuition and other fees, provide guidelines for admission of students to technical institutions uniformly through out the country.” At the hearing, the party-in-person seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition with proper pleadings and material. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn, WPMP.No.7372 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 12.03.2010 ES