(x‘¥ fx "”"’£’l'!£'!'o'!’!'5" iw8 ( AMENDED PETITION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No.2924/ 2006 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/ 227 ,OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Pradeep KumaNgJaiswal, S/b. Bharat Prasad Jaiswal, aged about 24 years, R/o. Parsada (Sill) Tahsil Pali, District Korba (C.G.) at present posted as Shiksha Karmi Grade—III at Primaly School, Pachpedi, Gram Panchayat, Shivpur, Block Pali, Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS PETITIONER : 1) State of Chhattisgarh through Secretaly, School Education Department , DKS Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) g‘L : 2) Janpa Panchayat, Pali, Block Pali, District Korba (C..G.) through 50 r Chief Executive Officer RESPONDENTS naV" (9 V, : Block Education Officer, Pali, Block Pali, District Korba (C.G.) Head Master, Government Primary School, Pachpedi , Shivpur, Block and Tahsil Pali, District Korba (C.G.) 3) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 'FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT /WRITS, ORDER/ ORDERS, DIRECTION] DIRECTIONS ETC. l I" 69 d XI—HC—78 mm ' (49$?2‘Rét 1n 200$ mam wmm WWW “a? f \x 26-6-2006 Mr. Satish Gupta, Deputy No.1, 3 & 4. Heard both the counsei. By the instant writ petiti dated 15‘ February, 2006, where crder dated 18-11-2005 has be 19 Grade-lll‘Shiksha Karmis ha place. The case of the petitioner Grade-ill under the orders of th Rs.2700—50-3700l— in Primary dated 18-11-2005, the petitione and again vide order dated 1-2 petitioner had joined in pursuan again transferred to Nawapara. after the petitioner joined the improved and people of Pach come to Pachpedi. Learned counsel for the p transfers therefore, he may respondent No.1 and he be dire Having heard learned cou facts and circumstances of the representation to respondent respondent No.1 is directed to l Mr. M.K. Sinha. counsel fo rthe petitioner. is that he was appointed as Shiksha Karmi Collector on 17-6-2005 in the pay scale of chool, Nawapara. Thereaner, vide order has been transferred to Pachpedi/Shivpur 2006 that order has been cancelled. The e of the’eariier order and now, he has been There are 79 students in Panchpedi and standard of education has considerably di have represented that nobody wants to titioner submits that it is a case of frequent allowed to make/a representation to d to decide the representation. sel for the parties and having regard to the case, the petitioner is allowed to make a .1 within 10 days from today, in tum de the same within 3O days from the date \ \ i i l i i i i WW(W) WWEWW awanttr ' Govt. Advocate for the Statelrespondents n, the petitioner has questioned the order y the petitioner's transfer to Pachpedi vide n cancelled and the petitioner among other e been asked to continue at their original r 0 d , i XI-HC-78 W>&‘? W was mm,m,m 2 n. n. a 2006” Wm(W) mmm WWW WWW F L, of receipt of the representatior WW§WW éawm a ‘ , in accordance with law. The petitioner should not be relieved till the decision of the representation, if already not relieved. With the direction aforesai in View of this order, M. stand disposed of. Parties are entitled for cert l Sd/— L.C. Bhadoo Judge d, the petition stands disposed of. 0N.)P.No.2237l2006 and l.A.No.5831/2006 tied copy of this order.