IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Review (T) No. 15 of 2008. Decided on: 29th October, 2010. Gopal Singh Sisodia. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Tarlok Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondent. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner is seeking review of the judgment rendered by the learned erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 1545 of 1993 on 24.05.2000 by deleting paragraph No. 21 of the judgment. 2. Case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that his case ought to have been considered for regularization on the basis of the instructions issued by the respondent-State on 30.11.1996. In paragraph No. 18 of the judgment, the learned Tribunal has come to the conclusion that since there were no provisions for regularization, the relief asked for could not be granted. It is abundantly clear from the instructions dated 30.11.1996 that services of adhoc employees, who had completed five years’ continuous service on or before the date of issuance of instructions were to be regularized subject to the availability of number of vacancies. Since this notification has not been considered by the learned Tribunal, though issued by the State 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - on 30.11.1996, the judgment dated 24th May, 2000 is liable to be recalled. 3. Consequently, the review petition is allowed. The judgment dated 24th May, 2000, rendered in O.A. No. 1545 of 1993 is recalled only to that extent, whereby the learned Tribunal has not taken into consideration the notification dated 30.11.1996. The Original Application No. 1545 of 1993 be listed for hearing in due course. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 29, 2010. (bhupender) - 3 -