IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 2126 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.8.2010 Kiran Kanta and others .....Petitioners Versus H.S. Grewal and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri L.S. Virk, Advocate, for the petitioners. Shri M.C. Berry, Additional AG, Punjab. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) Vide order dated 29.5.2009, this Court issued directions to decide the representation of the petitioners. In reply, it has been pointed out that the representation of the petitioners has been decided and benefit of Assured Career Progression Scheme has since been granted to the petitioners. In view of the said fact, no further orders are called for in the present petition. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. However, if the petitioners are aggrieved against the order passed, it shall be open for the petitioners to take recourse to the remedy, as may be available to the petitioners, in accordance with law. [ HEMANT GUPTA ] 16.8.2010 JUDGE ds