@- Petitioner Respondents COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition (0 No. 3523 of2007 Vivek Kumar Jain S/o Sampat Raj Jain, aged about 44 years, R/o Sarafa Line, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) Versus 1 Union of India, Through the Bhutal Pariwahan Mantralaya, New Delhi 2 State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Collector, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 4. Municipal Council, Kawardha, throiugh the Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council Kawardha, District Kabirdham C.G. WRIT PETITtON UNDER ARTICLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTIONOF SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri ¥- B/ Mrs. Rashmi Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gagendra Sahu, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ashok Varma, Standing counsel for the Union of india. Mre. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocste for the respondents No. 2 and 3/State. Mr. R.M. Solapurkar, Advocate for the respondent No. 4. ORDER (Passsd on this 2Stn day of June,2QQ?) 1. Petitioner apprehending demolition of her house/shop under the guise of widening of road has preferred this petition and also filed an application for interim relief. 2. Without following due procedure as prescribed under various laws including the Notational Highways Act, if applicable, Authorities herein should not dispossess the petitioner from the house/shop or demolish the same which is in her possession in the garb of widening of existing National HighwayNo.12-A. 3. With the aforesaid direction, this petition is disposed of. Consequently, I.A. No. 01, application for ad-interim writ, also stands disposed of. i jSatishK.Agnihotri 1 Judge