IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6645 of 2011 LALIT CHANDRA YADAV @ LALIT YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the bail petition during course of the day. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this court vide order dated 04.01.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40663 of 2010 but this second bail petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner on the ground that co-accused persons have already been released on bail after considering the postmortem report. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at the time of hearing of Cr. Misc. No. 40663 of 2010, it could not be placed before this court that in postmortem report, rigor mortise were found in all limbs of the deceased and on account of non- placing of the aforesaid important fact, this court rejected the prayer for bail of the petitioner. It would appear from perusal of Annexure-4 which is Photostat copy of order dated 09.02.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 356 of 2011 by which co-accused persons have been granted privilege of bail by a detail order after considering the - 2 - findings given in postmortem report of the deceased. In view of aforesaid submissions as well as to maintain the parity of justice, I think it proper to reconsider the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, namely, Lalit Chandra Yadav @ Lalit Yadav is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sessions Trial No. 331 of 2010 arising out of Supaul P. S. Case No. 254 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, (F.T.C. No.-V), Supaul. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)