1 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.879 OF 2010 Pratap Singh Amarsingh Rana (since deceased) & others ...Petitioners vs. The Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority ...Respondent Mr.Ahuja i/b M/s.Khilani & Co. for the petitioners Mr.S.P.Thorat for the respondent CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : MARCH 30, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners made an application for amendment of the plaint at the stage when the defendants were under cross examination. Considering the nature of the amendment and the stage at which the application was made, at this stage no interference is called for. The impugned order being interlocutory in nature is capable of being challenged in an Appeal which may be preferred by the petitioners against the decree passed in the suit if the same be adverse to the petitioners. 2 Subject to what is observed above, petition is disposed of. 3 All contentions of the parties on merits are kept open. JUDGE 2