IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.22901 of 2002 Between: Kaila Ramakrishna S/o.Sri Pullaiah, R/o.Sarava, Narasapuram Mandal, W.G.Dist., ..... PETITIONER AND Narasapuram Municipality, rep by its Commissioner Narasapuram, W.G.Dist., .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, declaring the action of the respondent Municipality in not issuing tender schedules to the petitioner pursuant to its Tender notice bearing R.O.C. NO.3911/2002-E1 dated 2.11.2002 as illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the Government orders issued in this regard and consequently direct the respondents to issue Tender schedules to the petitioner for the works notified in the said tender notice dated 2.11.2002 and receive the sealed tenders from the petitioner and consider them along with other tenders for awarding of works without insisting upon the petitioner for the registration in the Municipality as contractor. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.N.SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. S. Nageswar Reddy The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. _______________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 01.07.2005 Nsr ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Commissioner, Narasapuram Municipality, Narasapuram, W.G.Dist., 2 Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 3 2 CD copies