THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.24822 of 2009 ORDER: Assailing the inaction of respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in preventing trespass into the property of the petitioner, she filed the present writ petition. The petitioner claims to be the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Acs.1.55 cents comprised in R.S. No.102 of Mutheshwarapuram Village, Jaggaiahpet Mandal, Krishna District, which is said to have been gifted to her by her mother-in-law by way of a gift deed dated 7.3.1949. Petitioner states that her name also has been mutated in the revenue records. However, in the year 1996, when the Government proposed to distribute pattas to various people in respect of the said land, the petitioner approached this Court and filed Writ Petition No. 4515 of 1996. Initially, this Court granted interim direction to the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said property. However, through order dated 9.9.2005, this Court disposed of the said writ petition granting liberty to the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings to establish her title. Pursuant to which, the petitioner filed O.S. No.222 of 2008 before the VII Additional District Sessions Judge, Vijayawada. In that suit, she filed I.A. No.681 of 2008 seeking temporary injunction against the revenue authorities not to interfere with her possession and enjoyment over the property in question. Subsequently, the said I.A. came to be dismissed on 20.3.2009 and feeling aggrieved, the petitioner carried the matter in appeal, being, C.M.A. No. 377 of 2009 before this Court and this Court through order dated 9.4.2009, granted injunction restraining the revenue authorities not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner. While so, on 5.11.2009, when some of the villagers claiming to be assignees of the said property tried to trespass into the land and erect temporary huts, the petitioner lodged a complaint with respondent Nos. 3 and 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though she filed several complaints thereafter, the respondents did not take any action against the trespassers. Hence, she filed the present writ petition. This Court, on 17.11.2009 while granting time to the learned Government Pleader for Home for obtaining instructions in the matter, passed an interim order directing the respondents to provide police protection in implementing the order dated 9.4.2009 of this Court made in C.M.A.M.P. No. 658 of 2009 in C.M.A. No.377 of 2009. The matter underwent several adjournments thereafter. Today, the learned Additional Advocate General has filed a detailed affidavit stating that in C.M.A. No. 377 of 2009, which was filed by the petitioner assailing the order in I.A. No. 681 of 2008 in O.S. No. 222 of 2008, for the reasons best known to the petitioner, the petitioner herself has deleted the names of the unofficial respondents from the array of parties in the appeal and obtained injunction against the revenue department, i.e., the Collector, Krishna, Sub- Collector, Vijayawada and Tahsildar of Jaggaiahpet. However, when some third parties tried to trespass into her property, the petitioner filed a complaint on 5.11.2009 before the 1st respondent and alleging that no action was taken on the said complaint, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. Admittedly, in the instant case, the petitioner having filed C.M.A. No.377 of 2009 against third parties and having obtained injunction against the revenue department by deleting the names of those third parties, cannot seek for issuance of any directions against them. However, if any third parties are interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner, it is always open for her to approach the competent Civil Court and obtain necessary injunctive reliefs. In the circumstances, while granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedies as are available to her under law, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ________________ N.V.RAMANA,J Date: 25.8.2010 pnb