IN TE§V HIGH COUM‘ OF JUDIGWTUBE OF CHEATTISGQRH AT BILASPUR. W.P. N0. z/ / 200 1. / P WIT IONm- v/n/y s Ashok Leylana Finance Limited, Bramh 0f£ ice, C. M. D. ChOWk, Link Road, Bila$ur, 'Iah. anu‘ Distt. Bila spur, C. G. V3,)” RESP9mm s. 1./§tate of Chhattisgarh ‘3 Thmugh ?rimip&l Secretaxy, Eoxe st Departmnt, D.K.Bhawan. Raipur, Qqhattisgarh. 2. duief C¢n§rvator of Forést(Protect ion) , D. K. Bhawan, Ra ipur, mhatti sga :h ., 3. Con$rvator of Rorest, Bila spur Cucle, Bila spur, Chhattisga rh. 4. Competent iiuthority and Deputy Divisional Fore st Officer,3i1aspur porest Circle, B ila spur Chhattisga :h. 5. Tamas):ar Rae Pawar s/o Shyam Rao Pawar, Resident Of Chandni Gaowk, Kuduaand. Bila spLvr;;C. a v/ / V, 2’ WRII‘ PETII‘ION UNDER AEDICL§ 226/227 OF TI'E mNSTITUTION OF IMJEE EoR ISSUANCE OF wRm" OF 1&ND3MUS/cam‘xoaéxm AND OR PROHIBIHDN OR RNY sum mmycamk OR DIRECI'IGW In THE SAME NATURE IN THE CIRQJPSTAMES OF THE 0‘53. .M /1/200 82 MsNupur Pal, ledrned c ‘sel for The pe’ri‘rioner Dr' N K Shukla learned D A G for respondenTs/S‘rafe The pe‘h‘honer is The fl anger- m hire purchase of vehucle bear-mg reglsfmhon number . -26-C/5854 The said vehicle was seized by 'rhe‘ foresf de arfmen‘r on 26/2/2000 and fhe same is Iying ih 1'he cusfody of fhe Foresf Depar‘rmen‘rfThe proceedings are also going on. The main relief soughf in this vimif pe‘h‘hon is f0 direcf The res ondenTs To hand-over The seized vehicle on Supradnama To The peTiTioner Till final disposal of The case. s A Dr Shukla submiTs Tha since The fmander Is noT The regisTered owner of The ve Icle There is no posSIbIliTy of y allowing The peTiTioner, The ; icle finanjep/ be given cusTody of The said vehicle on Supra‘dna a. In facT/respondenT no.5 is The regisTered owner of The afore aid vehicle'm—W. Upon careful perusal of The savermenTs made in The presenT peTiTion and afTer he ring The counsel for The parTies I am of The View ThaT iT would n T be proper for This CourT To allow ———Z [ww o n v L:IA F mam mat am WW; WW WW Wmw‘n}%r€rm $Wm ‘d vehicle on Supradnama in' favour manc’er', inasmuch as The pefi‘rioner- To ask for 'rhe cus‘rody of ‘rhe said vehlcle In fhe presenf facts ahd ctrcumsfonces of The case I am unable To accepT The submisslons made on behalf of Thea“ ‘ peTiTioner. In *he result ‘rhis p’eth‘iPn' is dismissfd. Sdl- chief Jus‘ice mm(Wa) fhe prayer 1'0 release The sa of The pe'h'honer who Is The 1 has m my View no locus sfandl M\~———1 l