i1 PH! HIGH t3PT OF KANATAIA AT BANGAIOR! DATF THIS ! 8TH DAY OP JU 1998 B!FOE PH! HON’BF ?IP, JTJS’IOE V,P, ?HAN KUAfl irPIT BFPWN Sri, Shetty, S/a K,, VenkataohaTh, a/at No.72, 5th cross, Opt, Sandya Bar Blap, Keupapura Agxahara, Ba ngalozc—73. •• •Pet it loner ( By Sri, S,B, kkanriara, Advocate ) A The ?1anagemer2t of B’lore Metrcpditan Trarsport Qorpozat ion, K.H, road, Shanthinar, Bangalore—560 027. ,..Pspondent ( By Sri, P,, Ramesh, Advocate ) This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 of the aonstitution of India, praying to direct the respondent to ray ckwages as well as the wages in terms of the award dt,18.6,94 Dassed by the II Additabour Qourt at Bana1ore i, I,D.No,82 of 92 vide At,A to the writ petition forthwith, This writ petition coming on for eliminary hearing in ‘B’ Group this day, the Court made the fol owing: ‘5/ —2— 22LL1 the relief sought for by the petitioner is for a writ of mandamus directing the respon dents to pay the laokwages as also the wages in terms of the award dated 18.06.1994 in I.D. No.82/92. 2. today, It. P.?. Bamesh, learned Qounsel for the respondent has produced before me the copy of the (Jheque bearinp No.560025055 drawn on Syndicate Bat, Gandhinagar, Banalore, evidencing the pqyment of h.42,031—20. ,,r. I’Ukkannatma, learned Qoursel fox ‘the petitioner Is not Ste to apert either way whether the cheque Is received or not. Anyway, the resnondent has also produced the Boll of the Xstablishment evideming the above payment. In view of the above tayment made without adjudlatting finally paswsTp 8T UOT;act ;TM aq. ‘xauoT;aa aq; aq; sas ;anow aq; aq;aqM