IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID TUESDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2008 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1930 CRP.No. 1222 of 2005() ---------------------- TLB.1757/1973 of TALUK LAND BOARD, HOSDRUG .................... REVN. PETITIONER: APPLICANT --------------------------- STATE OF KERALA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.M.KAMAPPU RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT: ------------- P.N.SAVITHRI ANTHARJANAM, W/O. GOVINDAN EMBRANDIRI, PUTHILOT KODAKKAD VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK. BY // THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME PASSED THE FOLLOWING: HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. -------------------------------------------- C.R.P. NO. 1222 OF 2005 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of June, 2008 O R D E R The State of Kerala is the revision petitioner. The matter relates to the ceiling case initiated against one P.N. Savithri Antharjanam. By proceedings dated 16.6.1976, the Taluk Land Board, Hosdurg dropped further action in the case finding that the declarant is not liable to surrender any excess land. Subsequently, the ceiling case was reopened in the light of Section 85(9A) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 to verify whether an extent of 153.95 1/4 acres of land in various survey numbers of Hosdurg Taluk deleted from the account of the declarant on the ground that those lands were in the possession of tenants is correct. The authorised officer reported that the entire extent which was once deleted from the account of the assessee is in the possession of tenants on the basis of valid purchase certificates issued by the Land Tribunal. The authorised officer in his report recommended to drop the case and the Taluk Land Board accordingly dropped the proceedings initiated against the declarant. No grounds are made out by the revision petitioner for setting aside the order C.R.P. NO.1222/2005 2 under challenge. The order passed by the Taluk Land Board is based on the report of the authorised officer stating the factual position. The Civil Revision Petition is without any merit and it is accordingly dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. (HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE) sp/ C.R.P. NO.1222/2005 3 HAURN-UL-RASHID, J. C.R.P. NO. 1222/2005 O R D E R 10TH JUNE, 2008