w w s :K INTHEHIGHCClUlWaiB^UDIX^^itREIJ^Btl.ASR^ ::'l':w':'eHHAT^ISGARIijR^:';:;'':^ PElliliONER -fei^fe^ '..-filBb'-""' .e^tt;;.3ssw'J ^€^"" ^"^^M' RESPONDENTS W.R:.-(S)":No..;;&&^:S:^':;:./^006S::.^;:'::^^ Ramanand Sahu, S/a Shrj H^ Sahu,aged about 43 years, Assistant TeacRer, Goyt. PrjmaFy School No.2, New ^ Khureipar, Bhilai,^ D ^,<C.G.), .;;'.::r' ; ;:...':.; ,. ...::^';' VERSUS ag>^ <su ^v Q. ss »•* 1. Stat&ofCtihattisgrh/^ Through-TheSecretary, Edueatioh^Department,D.K.S. Bhawan,Raipur(C.G.) 2. TheDireGtor/' PubliRlnstri.ictipnDepartment, Chhattisgarh Giovt.Raipyr 3. Djstriet Edueatibn Officer, Durg,/' Distt.-Durg(C.G.) 4. BloeK Educatiohl Officer, Duig/^ Distt.-Durg(C;G.), :WRltpMTili:NliNiiiiRTI(lLEl226/22t!oKTHE. ;::::S;WSSSiSi»§THiim :^F'lN0 l-^i^^kir-in XI-HC-78 tTT<1CfTSh*11W 3^''^P[R;ra', gTfty'i?, («i<iwy .A;^J)^l(.46^ ^ 200 3Tf^?rVW (l{c|i^s|^l!T) •W^T^irfSFtW gsiTsn^TsRDR; S^ITW:;af?(T3TI^T *l<(?i-t<)1'< WRlf ff fe^t' d^RZTC ^srf^TST^T ¥- 06.12.2006 Shri Vipin Tiwari, leamec) Smt. Anju Aahuja, learn^d counsel for the petitioner. G.A. for the State/respondent. By this petition under Atticles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a direction|to the respondents to pay the increments and seniority on the basis of tti of the decision rendered by 1 Jabalpur in Original Applicatior others Vs. State crf M.P. and otl 2. Learned counsel appeai^ |e date of his initial appointment in the light [he leamed State Administrative Tribunal, No. 2745/1989 (Madhukant Yadu and 58 ^ers)dated24.8.1992 ng for the petitioner placed reliance on the order dated 9"' October 2006 p|assed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No. 5473/2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sh^rma and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and in Writ Petitiojn (S) No. 5474/2006 (Jai Nath Bajpai Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and o<hers) and submits that the petitioner is similarly situated, therefore, th^ 3. The case of the petitioi] two years with the fixed salaryl years' probation, the petitionerl similar order may be passed. er is that he was appointed as Assistant Teacher in the School Educati^in Department on probation for a period of However, later on, after completion oftwo was regularized but, he was not given the regular pay scale. Other sim|ilarly situated teachers moved the State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalj^ur for regular pay-scale, viAierein learned J8.1992 allowed the same. The petitioner Tribunat vide order dated 24j made several representations 1 o accord the same treatment as he isalso ^o XI-HC-78 3n^T^rf??N> tiwsTigiffaiiira? *'' t.. P.T.O. / ^ HI*1WI ShMlth 3^ "Mi-iiM'1), »Tf1.«'is,Rtowy ^^Akfc/.to6..^2oo 3TT^?T<<aqi (l^t^°«<tT) s'RdWflfia'a'n^T similarly situated, but, the resp^ndents have not paid any heed. Thus, this petition. 4. Leamed counsel for the| be allowed to make a treatment to the petitioner and to other similarly situated Administrative Tribunal dated respondent/State has no objectfon petitioner submits that the petitioner may repres^ntation to respondent No.1 to give similar iame pay-scale which has been sanctioned on account of the order of the State t.8.1992, to which leamed counset for the teadhers 24. 5. Having heard leamed the facts and circumstances o1 limited prayer made by learnejd reasonable. Therefore, the petj within a period oftwo weeks fr<|> grievances and, in tum, representation in an objective date of reeeipt of such raised by the petitioner and passed by the learned State A<|lr No. 2745/1988. r^ 6. The writ petition is ac' direction. No order asto costs. 7. Certified copy as per rul^s. t>i''itci<(l-i wicff fff3'S (tear ^i-sri^irsn^r cijiunsel for the parties and having regard to the case, in the opinion ofthis Court, the counsel for the petitioner appears to be tioner is allowed to make a representation (timtodayto respondentNo.1, raising all his ^spondent No.1 shall decide the said ijnanner within a period of 30 days from the repr^sentation, after considering all the points into account the order dated 24.8.1992 k<|tministrative Tribunal in Original Applteation tal{ing nrdingly disposed of wth the aforesaid Sd/- Dhirednra Mishra Judge P.T.O.