SCR.A/680/2006 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 680 of 2006 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= VINOD KUKABHAI - Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : THROUGH JAIL for Applicant(s) : 1, MR KT DAVE, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondents ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI Date : 04/05/2006 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Rule. Mr.K.T.Dave, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of rule on behalf of the respondents. SCR.A/680/2006 2/2 JUDGMENT 2. Present is the application received through jail. The petitioner – convict has made serious allegations against one officer – Mr.D.J.Vankar and a co- prisoner – Mansangji Jenaji. 3. Mr.K.T.Dave, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced on record communication dated 28.04.2006 from the office of the Additional Director General of Police and Inspector General of Prisons addressed to the Assistant Government Pleader. It is stated therein that the petitioner – convict has disowned the application and has stated that the said officer has never demanded any amount from the petitioner – convict or the co-prisoner – Mansangji Jenaji has also not asked for any amount. 4. In view of that, the application is disposed of. Rule is discharged. (RAVI R.TRIPATHI, J.) *Shitole