IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 248 OF 2004 H.S.J. Dhillon .. Petitioner V/s. The Union of India & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. N.M. Ganguli for the Petitioner Mr. D.A. Dubey with Mr. Y.R. Mishra for the Respondent No. 1. Mr. Anil Sethi i/b. M/s. Wadia Ghandy & Co. for the Respondent No. 2. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. DATED : 17.03.2005. DATED : 17.03.2005. DATED : 17.03.2005. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. The challenge to the Act has been negated by the Supreme Court. Apart from that on behalf of the Respondent No. 2, the learned counsel makes a statement that they have abandoned the notice dated 9.8.2003 issued under the Securitisation Act and has proceeded under the DRT. for recovery of loan amount. Considering the above, nothing survives in this Petition. Petition accordingly disposed of. (F.I. REBELLO, J (F.I. REBELLO, J (F.I. REBELLO, J.) (S.P. KUKDAY, J (S.P. KUKDAY, J (S.P. KUKDAY, J.)