IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 14TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 23RD BHADRA 1929 RP.No. 872 of 2007(D) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.32794/2006 Dated 08/12/2006 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT IN WPC -------------------------------------------------------- ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PARAVOOR SUB-DIVISION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, NORTH PARAVOOR. BY ADV. SRI.M.DINESH RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER & 2ND RESPONDENT IN WPC ------------------------------------------------ 1. NATESAN, S/O. PHALGUNAN, HOUSE NO.III/262, NAYARAMBALAM PANCHAYAT, NAYARAMBALAM. 2. SECRETARY, NAYARAMBALAM PANCHAYAT, NAYARAMBALAM P.O. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... R.P. No.872 of 2007 in W.P.(C) No.32794 of 2006 .................................................................... Dated this the 14th day of September, 2007. JUDGMENT This review petition is filed stating that facts assumed by this court while disposing of the W.P. are incorrect in as much as connection was given before the judgment in the building in which petitioner applied for water connection first. Obviously this court directed connection to be given to the petitioner only on the assumption that no connection was given based on the original application and it was a case of request for transfer of application for connection to the new premises acquired by petitioner. In fact Contempt Case was also dismissed on the same ground on which this review is filed. In the circumstances, R.P. is allowed recalling the judgment. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms