1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Criminal Writ Petition No. 395/2010 (Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd. .vs. State of Maharashtra ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. Nirbhay Chavan, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. D.M. Kale, APP for Respondent. CORAM : P.D. KODE, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 20, 2010 The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that all the necessary facts had remained to be incorporated in an application made before the learned JMFC for returning the truck on supratnama and the same has resulted in negating the prayer made by the petitioner. He urged that till today nobody had approached for either claiming ownership or custody of the said truck. He states that in these circumstances, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to make appropriate application before the learned JMFC incorporating all the necessary details and making the concerned persons as party to the application for returning the said truck on supratnama to the petitioner. Having regard to the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the matters reflected from the orders passed by the learned 2 JMFC as well as the appellate Court, the petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE halwai