IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26696 of 2008 KAMAL KISHORE URAON @ KAMAL KISHORE MAHTO & ORS Vrs. THE STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 29.07.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioners, the State as well as the complainant. 2. Petitioner no. 1, Kamal Kishore Uraon @ Kamal Kishore Mahto, is the father-in-law, petitioner no. 2, Rajbuna Devi, is the mother-in-law, and petitioner no. 3, Bablu Uraon @ Vivek Uraon, is minor son of petitioners 1 and 2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that any demand for dowry can not be made by them as they are not the beneficiary. The complaint case has been filed by the complainant in connivance with her husband. 3. Considering the facts, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners, above named, is allowed. The are directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case of their surrender before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Tr. No. 1715 of 2007 arising out of Complaint Case No. 506C of 2006 to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )