- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.5176 OF 2004 Mr.Sunil Dighe for the Petitioner. ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. ¦ DATED: 4TH MAY,2005 P.C.: 1. The appointment of the Petitioner all along was on purely temporary vacancy or on tenure vacancy. Temporary services of the Petitioner were terminated because there was no grant released for the project. The School Tribunal has, therefore, found that the termination is not illegal and therefore dismissed the appeal. In this petition all arguments were advanced before me as to how on the government subsequently releasing - 2 - grant again the Petitioner can be absorbed. The question of absorption of the Petitioner is clearly beyond the compass of this petition. The only question relevant in this petition is whether the termination of the services of the Petitioner is legal or illegal. I find that the order terminating the services of the Petitioner is perfectly legal. Therefore, the petition cannot be entertained. It is rejected. ...