IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P(T) No. 4838 of 2008. Decided on: 31st August, 2010. Kanta Devi. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : None. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent No. 3. : Mr. Varun Chandel, Advocate vice Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India. None for respondent No. 4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No. 4 to the post of Anganwari Worker in Anganwari Centre, Bhajol. Petitioner and respondent No. 4 have appeared before a duly constituted selection committee. Petitioner has secured 7.2 marks, whereas respondent No. 4 has secured 12.6 marks in the interview. In view of the recommendations made by a duly constituted selection committee, the respondent No. 4 was appointed as Anganwari Worker in Anganwari Centre, Bhajol. Petitioner has not alleged malafides against any member of selection committee. Once the suitability of the candidates has been adjudged by a duly constituted selection committee, this Court can not sit in appeal over the same. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge August 31, 2010. (bhupender)