FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.846 OF 2008 -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Mr.Vijay Killedar for the petitioners. Mr.Nitin Mulye for the respondent. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2008 DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2008 DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2008 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This petition is directed against concurrent findings recorded by the courts below in the proceedings arising from the application at Exhibit-5 filed by the petitioners seeking injunction against the respondent. I perused the orders passed by the courts below so also the other material placed before me. In my opinion, no case for interference is made out by the petitioners in the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence the writ petition is dismissed. It is needless to express that if the respondents create third party rights in survey No.31/3C during pendency of the suit it would be at the risk of purchaser and subject to outcome of the suit. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)