HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(S) N0.7018l2011 PETITIONER Vishnu Ram Onti, 8/0 Shri Brij Lal Onti, aged about 57 years, Principa! Govt. Hr. Sec. School Jharamtola, Block DaudiLohara, District Durg(C.G.) Versus RESPéNDENTS 1 The State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 The Commissioner, Public lnstructions, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) The District Education Officer, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance : Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Bhaskar Pyasi, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (25.11.2011) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. By way of this petition, the petitioner is seeking regular pay scale on the post of Assistant Teacher from the date o initial appointment. f wmsy No.7o1a/2011 Counsel for the petitioner submits that number of identical petitions have been decided by this Court and the issue involved is a conciuded one He has also referred to one of the orders in W.P.(Sl No.813/2007 gem Kumar Sahu — Vs- State of Chhattisqarh), in which, regular pay scale was granted from the date of initial appointment. Counsel for the respondents/State submits that in light of the judgment of this Court, the petitioner may make a representation to the authorities concerned and the same‘would be decided after scrutinizing the factual and legal position. Thus, it is directed that if the petitioner makes a representation to the authorities concerned within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same shall be decided within a further period of one month from the date of its receipt. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. scii- ’7 Sunil Kumar Sinha shyna Judge