IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8843 of 2009 M/S KALYANI CONSTRUCTION VERSUS (1) THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECY, RURAL ENGINEERING ORGANIZATION, PATNA (2) THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF, REO, PATNA (3) THE CHIEF ENGINEER, REO, PATNA (4) THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, RURAL WORKS DEPARTMENT, WORKS DIVISION, GAYA (5) THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RURAL WORKS DEPARTMENT WOKS DIVISION, GAYA (6) THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, RURAL WORKS DEPARTMENT, WORTKS DIVISIN, GAYA. ORS ----------- 2 31.07.2009. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Leased counsel for the petitioner prays for a direction to the respondent authorities to pay the agreement amount as well as the revised rate of estimate, cost and the other dues accrued to the petitioner in construction of RCC Bridge over river Morhar near Panchdeota in Tekari law Road under district of Gaya. The petitioner states that the respondents in course of construction asked the petitioner to do some additional work which he has been doing. Leaned counsel has referred to annexure 14 which is momo no. 1966 dated 25.9.2008 written by the Executive Engineer to Assistant Engineer. In the aforesaid memo, the Executive Engineer stated that as against work order of Rs. 2,41,77,360/- the petitioner has done work to the tune of Rs. 1,52,87,000/-. It was also stated in the aforesaid memo that the contractor has also prayed for disbursement of amount in respect of work done in excess of the agreement. It appears that the leaned counsel has filed various - 2 - representations for payment and calculations of bills which are mentioned in annexures 15 and 16 of the writ petition. Annexure 16 has been addressed to the superintending Engineer, Rural Works Division, and Gaya. After hearing the counsel for the parties, this court observes that if the petitioner files a detailed representation before respondent no.4, the Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Gaya, he would dispose of the representation by a speaking order within two months from the date of receipt of the same. The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid directions. Shashi (S. P. Singh, J.)