SlngfeBench IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS W. P. S^ N0. 5t^g^ OF 2009 i' Shiv Kumari wife of Chandra shekhar Singh, aged about-30 years R/o village- Gharghoda, Tahsil- Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS 1. •^'State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, General Administration Department , D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Commissioner, Bhu- Abhilekh, Raipur (C.G.) 3 Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur C.G.) 4. - .Collector, Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA _C__I.1^__1- rc—?s 3?I^?r W l^'TRi' ^?f 3n^si)*ijq) *11*1CTI <t)«fl^i ^^ •^iww^, ^W<»,{s|<-liy^< ..M^.feirbHSt.. STI^l'q^T (l^lf^l^El) IF^nW^tf^T 371^ •OB : IION'BIiE SHRI JUCi'!"'CE <tt1<i^«<h Mltl<tff ^f 'fe1^' T^iR^TC 16.07.2009 Shri Manoj Kumar Sinhfr, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, P.L. |for the State. At the outset, counsel jbr the petitioi^ier submits that he may be pemiitted to withdraw the' ^etition and a direction be issued to tiie respondent No.4 for deciding tjie representa.tion (Annexure P/'S) dated 3.7.2009. • Counsel for the State si|ibmits that the petitioner ought to ha.ve been waited for some time becjause the representation has been made on 3.7.2009 and he has rush^d to the Court iErimediately. Ke further submits that the representati law. Accordingly,. the petit! respondent No.4 is expectei petitioner expeditiouslv- oretei the date oi' receipt of cooy ol' t bn would be decided in accordance with lon is dismissed as withdrawn. The to decide the recresentation of the lab.tv wdthin a penod of one month fi-oiu Ms oraer. Sd/- prtemterDiwaker Judge