THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY R.T.P.NO.37 OF 2010 ORDER: This application has been filed under Section 33 of the A.P. Civil Courts, Act, 1972, to receive the plaint and transfer the same to the Additional District Court, Hindupur. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the material brought on record. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, initially, presented the plaint before the Additional District Court, Hindupur. The plaint came to be returned on 11.06.2009 with a written endorsement, which reads as under. “Heard the learned advocate for plaintiff with regard to unnumbered plaint (CF). Learned advocate filed memo stating that the petitioner-plaintiff wants to return the plaint on 01.05.2009. In view of the memo filed by the learned advocate for plaintiff (C.F.) in the plaint, the plaint is ordered to be returned to the party or advocate”. It appears that the petitioner, instead of presenting the papers before the Court concerned, has filed this instant application with a prayer stated supra. The plaint came to be returned by the Additional District Judge, Hindupur, on 11.06.2009. It is for the petitioner to represent the plaint before the Court concerned. This is not a fit case to receive the plaint and transmit the same to the Court concerned. Even otherwise, since the civil Courts have reopened after Pongal Vacation, 2010, the petitioner is at liberty to present the plaint before the Court concerned. Hence, the RTP is dismissed and the Registry is directed to return the papers to the petitioner forthwith for presenting the same before the Court concerned. _______________________ (B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J) 19th January 2010 RRB