IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.36990 of 2010 RAMA SAH son of Mohar Sah Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 02.12.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 22.11.2010, this Court granted bail to the petitioner Rama Sah. He further submits that by mistake order of another case has wrongly been typed in this case. It further appears that the order of this case by mistake has been typed in Cr. Misc. No. 36900 of 2010, which reads as follows: “Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner has been made accused in a case under Section 135 of the N.D.P.S. Act. 10 K.G. Ganja was recovered from the roof of Bus. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been implicated in this case on mere suspicion. He submits that admittedly the petitioner was not found traveling in the bus concerned. The petitioner is in custody since last 4 months. In the circumstances, petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Presiding Officer (Special) Economic Offences, Muzaffarpur in connection with Customs case no.7 of 2010”. Let the order dated 22.11.2010 quoted above be read as passed in Cr. Misc. No. 36900 of 2010. In the circumstances, the order typed in this case on 22.11.2010 for listing this case on Monday i.e. 29.11.2010 retaining 2 its position is superfluous and is thus recalled. In the circumstances, petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Govindganj P.S. case no. 124 of 2009 (N.D.P.S. Case No. 91 of 2009). Let this order be sent to the court of Special Judge, Motihari, East Champaran through Fax at the cost of the petitioner. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)