31 $- * IN THE HIGH COTIRT OF DELHI AT NEW DELIII + w.P.(cRL) r233t2Qrr I{ARPAL SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. D.R. Jain & Mr. Neeraj Jain, Advocates VETSUS STATE & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh MAhajan, A.S.C. for State .CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MI]KTA GIIPTA ORDER o/o 28.09.2011 By this petition, the Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR. 'A status report has been filed by the State. The same is taken on record. Learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State states that since the Petitioners did not appear before the learned Trial Court, proceedings under Sectiqn 82 Cr. P.C. have been initiated against the Petitioners. Further, in the present petition, the identity of Petitioner No. 4 is also disputed. In view of the fact and circumstances of the case, I do not find it a fit case to quash the FIR in question on the ground that parties have settled the matter. The petition is dismissed. W.re- SEPTEMBER 28, 20tt 'dk' MUKTA GUPTA, J. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Signature Not Verified