IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No 14042 of 2009 1. SHEO KUMARI DEVI W/O SRI GURUDEO SINGH MOHALLA- CHANKYA COLONY, NATHUPUR, P.S.- PARSA BAZAR, DISTT.- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PATNA 2. THE REGISTRAR PATNA REGISTRY OFFICE, PATNA COLLECTORATE CAMPUS, PATNA 3. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR PATNA REGISTRY OFFICE, PATNA COLLECTORATE CAMPUS, PATNA 4. SMT. PUSPANJALI GUPTA W/O SRI BHARAT PRASAD GUPTA VILL.- LAI, P.O.- LAI, P.S.- BITHA, DISTT.- PATNA 5. SRI BIDESHWARI PRASAD SINGH S/O LATE RAMBRIKSHA SINGH MOHALLA- BELA, P.S.- PUNPUN, DISTT.- PATNA. AT PRESENT R/O MOHALLA- CHANKYA COLONY, NATHUPUR, P.S.- PARSA BAZAR, DISTT.- PATNA 6. SMT. USHA RANI W/O SRI BIDESHWARI PRASAD SINGH MOHALLA- BELA, P.S.- PUNPUN, DISTT.- PATNA. AT PRESENT R/O MOHALLA- CHANKYA COLONY, NATHUPUR, P.S.- PARSA BAZAR, DISTT.- PATNA ----------- 2 07.11.2009 The dispute is entirely a private dispute between the petitioner and respondents No 4, 5 and 6. Petitioner alleges that the said respondents have unauthorisedly encroached upon her land by virtue of a sale deed wrongly registered. In my view, this is a pure civil dispute as between private parties and writ petition is not appropriate remedy in such a matter. Petitioner would be well advised to prefer such other remedy as she may be advised. With this observation, the writ petition is dismissed. M.E.H./ (Navaniti Prasad Singh)