IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 12538 of 2004 Between: Prakasam District Permanent Fund Ltd. 23-1-106, Ist Floor, Guptha's Gold House, Gandhi road, Ongole, rep.by Managing Director ..... PETITIONER AND 1) The Reserve Bank of India rep.by its Chief General Manager Dept. of Non-Banking Supervision, Central Office, Centre-1, 2nd Floor, B-Wing, World Trade Centre Complex, Cuffe Parade, Colaba, Mumbai 2) The Regional Director, The Reserve Bank of India, Dept. of Non-Banking Supervision, Secretariat Road, Saifabad, Hyderabad 3) The Union of India reptd.by its Under Secretary to Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance, Dept.of Company Affairs, Sastry Bhavan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the order dated 08-07-2004 and the consequential orders in DNBS (H) CMS No.183/HYD- 0536/2004-05, dated 09-07-2004 and DNBS (H) CMS No184/HYD- 536/2004-05, dated 09-07-2004 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents herein to consider and dispose of the application dated 25-03-2004 of Writ Petitioner for Notification under Sec.620-A of the Companies Act, 1956 Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.V.BHATT Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MS.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.12538 OF 2004 ORDER : This writ petition is filed with the following prayer : “To issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the order dated 08-07-2004 and the consequential orders in DNBS (H) CMS No.183/HYD-0536/2004-05, dated 09-07-2004 and DNBS (H) CMS No184/HYD-536/2004-05, dated 09-07-2004 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents herein to consider and dispose of the application dated 25-03-2004 of Writ Petitioner for Notification under Sec.620-A of the Companies Act, 1956.” When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner represented that in view of the events that have taken place after filing this writ petition, there is no need to go into the merits of the case at this stage and, therefore, no further adjudication is necessary. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. ________________ G.ROHINI, J 28th JANUARY, 2009 SUR/KLP