IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO.12060 OF 2011 ANIRUDH YADAV SON OF ADALAT YADAV VILLAGE- BHAGATPUR, P.S.- BALIA, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ---------------------------------- 5 04/08/2011 Heard Mr. Sandeep Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant and learned APP for the State. The petitioner is one of the named accused of the case registered under Sections 302, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act in which the petitioner has been described to be the shooter of the deceased. Altogether 15 persons are named as accused in the written report of the informant. Submission is that though the petitioner has been described as assailant of the deceased in the written report but the informant, in his further statement, has given altogether a different version of the occurrence by describing Giridhari Yadav as shooter of the deceased. Similar is the evidence of wife of the deceased whose statement has been recorded in paragraph 31 of the case diary. Another independent witness whose statement has been recorded in paragraph 32 of the case diary also stated that it was Giridhari who has shot at and killed the deceased. 2 Further submission is that Giridhari Yadav has motive to kill because earlier his one hand was chopped off and his one was damaged so he has taken revenge. Opposing prayer for bail of the petitioner the learned counsel for the informant submits that besides the present case the petitioner is accused in three more cases. Be that as it may, considering the contradictory statement of the informant, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri B. B. Rai, J. M., Begusarai in connection with Ballia P.S. Case No. 21 of 2005. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)