t. cf-[^^ •^- IN THEJHIGH COURT OF JIUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W. P. (Sl No. l<5o-l /O? / 2009 ^- & • PETITIONER ^- ^J^.--' .^&^ ^t^--"" ..^•^^ f<w »••"' ^••y RESPONDENTS Rajkumar Bajrang, S/o. Shri Sona Ram Bajrang, aged about 36 years, Caste - Suryawanshi, schedule caste, Astt. Engineer, Elec./Mech. heavy Machinery Division, Off.. Executive Engineer Mahanadi Jalasay, Project Rudri, Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS 1. ^ Secretary, Water Resources Department Govt. of C.G., D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) 2. Engineer in Chief C/o. Engineer in Chief Water Resources Department "Shihava Bhawa" Raipur(C.G.) 3. Chief Engineer Mahanadi" Jalasay Project, Elec./Mech. Heavy Machines Division, Raipur(C.G.) 4. Executive Engineer, Elec./Mech. Heavy Machinery Division, Rudri, Di^tt.-Dhamtari (C.G.) 5. Shri S.L. Vchariya, Executive Engineer, Elec./Mech. Havey Machinery Division Planner (C.G.) WRirPETITIQNJJNDER ARTICLE 226/327 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . s' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION (S.) N0 1201 of2007. Respondeots Rajkumar Bajranj versus State oj Others. ICfahatti,sgarh& Shri Shasfai Kumar Kushwaha, petitioner Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the respondent no. 1 to 4. (Passed on lBofNIarch, 2007) 1. Learaed counse! apnearin'g fbr the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a member ofScheduled Caste community. 2. The petitioner further submits that he faas been shown in the provisional list against general candidate, The provisional list is always prepared for raising objection or raaking corrections, if any, found in the provisional list by the employees. 3. It appears that the petitioner, even without waiting tbr final seniority list, has rushed to this Court. The petitioner ought to have raised this objectioa before the concemed authorities for 1' -~^ ';;' -2- making necessary amendments in the provisional list before issue offinal seniority list. In view of tfae above, the petition is devoid of merits and it cannot be entertained at tfais stage. The petitioner has sufficient opportunity by raising his objection before preparation of final list. This petition is misuse ofjudicial process oflaw. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as not maintainable witb. cost quantified to be Rs. 500/- payable to the Chhattisgarh High Court Legal Services Committee, within a period of two weeks from today, Subhash Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge