IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI THURSDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2009 / 14TH JYAISHTA 1931 LA.App..No. 679 of 2003(D) -------------------------- LAR.21/2001 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ALAPPUZHA .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------ STATE OF KERALA BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.RAJAN JOSEPH, ADDL.A.G. RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT AND ADDL.RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------- 1. RAVINDRAN NAIR, CHAMPASSERIL, CHINGOLI. 2. BHASKARAN NAIR, CHAMPASSERIL, CHINGOLI. 3. SANTHAKUMARI, CHAMPASSERIL, CHINGOLI. 4. THE DIRECTOR, INDIAN WATER WAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, 2347 N, PARAMARA SHOPPING COMPLEX, PARAMARA ROAD, KOCHI 18. ADV. SRI.V.SANTHARAM, SC, IWAI FOR R4 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/06/2009 ALONG WITH LAA.NOS.564, 596, 819, 935 OF 2005 & 563, 660, 839, 912 OF 2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L.A.A.Nos. 679 of 2003, 564, 596, 819, 935 of 2005 & 563, 660, 839, 912 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius.C.Kuriakose, J. These are all appeals preferred by the State against the judgments and decrees of the reference court enhancing the compensation. But it is seen that in respect of the very same judgments and decrees, the requisitioning authority has preferred L.A.A.Nos.257/05, 824/04, 872/06, 822/04, 1220/05, 387/04, 825/04, 440/06 & 106/06. In view of the pendency of the appeals preferred by the requisitioning authority, it is not necessary to entertain the appeals preferred by the government. All these appeals will stand dismissed as unnecessary. But the merits of the grounds raised in these appeal memoranda will be examined in the appeals preferred by the requisitioning authority. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE P.Q.BARKATH ALI JUDGE sv.