IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Rev. No.2330 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : FEBRUARY 22, 2010 RAJESH KUMAR ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Karanjit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. Ms. Sumanpreet Aulakh, Advocate, for the complainant. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) This petition is directed against order dated 6.6.2009 whereby the trial court has directed framing of charge for commission of offence under Section 306, Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has pointed out that 4 witnesses have already been examined, including material witnesses. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in the face of dying declaration of deceased-Sonia wife of Rajesh Kumar (Annexure P-2), no offence is made out. It was an accidental fire, on account of bursting of stove. Considering the fact that 4 witnesses have already been Criminal Rev. No.2330 of 2009 2 examined, the revisional court would not like to interfere in the matter. The trial court would be required to consider the dying declaration and its effect in the context of commission of offence. The petition is disposed of. February 22, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?