IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 8171 of 2006 DATED: 24.4.2006 Between: D.Koteshwar Rao petitioner And APSRTC Rep by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director Musheeerabad, Hyderabad and another Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.8171 of 2006 ORAL ORDER : The present writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to refix the pay of the petitioner by allowing 1997 pay revision recommendations and other increments including special grade increment, promotion increment and annual increments and to pay the arrears and retirement benefits on revised pay scales. The petitioner herein retired as Assistant Depot Clerk on 31.01.2003 on attaining the age of superannuation. The grievance of the petitioner is that he was transferred to Kanigiri and Addanki depots in the year 1997 on administrative grounds and due to non availability of his personal case record in the said depots, the respondents had not allowed revised pay scales and benefits of 1997 Pay Scale Recommendations. Thus he contends that his pay was not fixed properly and without allowing the benefits under 1997 Pay Revision Recommendations, he was retired. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent corporation. The petitioner retired from service on 31.1.2003 on attaining the age of superannuation and except making a representation dated 18.3.2004 he has kept quiet all these days. The petitioner alleges that 1997 Pay Revision benefits were not extended to him and did not explain the reasons for his silence all these years. Hence, the only direction that can be given in the present writ petition is to direct the respondents to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 18.3.2004, if any pending with the respondents. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 18.3.2004 in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. If the petitioner is entitled to refixation, the respondents shall take necessary steps to re-fix the pay the petitioner in terms of the rules of the corporation. No costs. ____________ N.V.RAMANA,J DATE: 24.4.2006 TVK THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 8171 of 2006 DATED: 24.4.2006