IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.224/2006 IN W.P.1316/2004 RAJENDRA KEDAR ..VS.. R.M. BHUSARI D.D.R. & ANOR Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or judges Orders. CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE: 16 /11 / 2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this contempt petition, the petitioner had sought action against the respondents under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, for willful disobedience of the order passed by this court on 23.4.2004 in W.P. No.1316/2004. According to the petitioner it was incumbent on the respondents to have paid the salary to the petitioner during the pendency of the writ petition, but the same was not paid, inspite of the judgment, passed by this court in W.P.1316/2004. Shri Dharmadhikari, the learned counsel for the respondents states that though by the judgment dated 23.4.2004, the High Court had not directed the respondents to pay the salary to the petitioner, for the period during which the petition was pending, the Administrator & Secretary of the A.P.M.C. Nagpur has filed an affidavit on 15.11.2008 stating therein that the A.P.M.C. had paid an amount of Rs.2,47,029/- towards salary to the petitioner, for the period from 25.4.2002 to 24.4.2004. Shri Madkholkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the receipt of the amount of Rs.2,47,029/- towards salary from the respondents. In such circumstances, it would not be necessary for this court to further deal with the matter, as the grievance of the petitioner about the non payment of the salary stands redressed. Hence in the aforesaid circumstances, the petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE SMP.