1 srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Criminal Application No.988 of 2010 In Criminal Appeal No.182 of 2010 The State of Maharashtra Applicant Vs. Saeed Ahmed Abdul Kadir & ors. Respondents Mr.D.P.Adsule, APP for State. Mr.P.B.Shah for resp.nos.1, 3 and 6. Mr.M.N.Sandhyanshiv for resp.no.2. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. March 17, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Adsule, the learned APP. The State has filed an application under Section 378(3) of Cr.P.C. Seeking leave to appeal against acquittal order passed on 31/12/2008, under Section 307 read with Section 34 of IPC by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon in Sessions Case No.76 of 2001 and the said application is beyond time. Hence this application for condonation of delay. 2. In Criminal Appeal No.280 of 2009 which has been filed 2 for enhancement of sentence by the State, all the accused have been served and Mr.Shah appears for respondent 1, 3 and 6 and Mr.Sandhyanshiv appears for respondent nos.2. Respondent Nos.4 and 5 have been served. 3. We are, therefore, satisfied that the delay caused of 330 days deserves to be condoned. 4. Hence the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)