1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 45. CA/4735/2009 In FAST/7700/2009 WITH CA/2698/2010 In FAST/7700/2009 WITH CA/4736/2009 In FAST/7700/2009 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mrs. Geeta Deshpande, Adv., for the applicant. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:2-3-2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard. The acquiring body feels aggrieved by excessive award. There is delay of 223 days in causing to file the appeal. Learned A.G.P. appears for respondent no.6. Original claimants/respondent nos. 1 to 5 served, however, no participation. Considering the difficulties faced by the acquiring body, I do not see that the delay of 223 days is deliberate. It is sufficiently explained. The rights accrued to 2 the acquiring body, having felt that the award under challenge is on higher pedestal, devoid of reference to the sale instances, delay is condoned. Application (No.4735/2009) is allowed. 2. By Civil Application No. 2698/2010, the acquiring body seeks extension of time for further eight weeks. Record illustrates on 16.11.2009, notices were directed to be issued and ad interim protection was granted in favour of acquiring body allowing it to deposit the whole of decretal amount in this Court within a period of eight weeks. The period of eight weeks virtually expired on 12th Jan., 2010. The appellant body could not make remittance. Considering the difficulties, further time of four weeks from today is extended to comply the directions. 3 Application (No.2698/2010) for extension of time and Application No.4736/2009 for stay are allowed and disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/4735-09cagr