In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh C.W.P. No. 14817 of 2006 Date of Decision: September 15, 2006 Sanjay Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI PRESENT: Mr. K.S. Dhanora, Advocate, for the petitioner. JUDGMENT M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral) No rules regulating the post of Pond Keeper has been referred to or produced before us, which may support the claim of the petitioner. A vague and general statement has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, which cannot be accepted. Therefore, we permit withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one on the same cause of action after referring to the rules applicable. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (M.M.S. BEDI) CWP No. 5306 of 2006 September 15, 2006 JUDGE Pkapoor 2