IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.5051 of 2010 Between: Mohd.Shareef. ..... Petitioner AND 1.A.P.State Housing Corporation Ltd., Govt. of A.P., Nampally, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Vice Chairman and 2 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Kilarukhadar Baba Counsel for the Respondents: Sri K.Mohan Rami Reddy The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondents, in delivering the quarter constructed in plot No.79, Survey No.136 of Gachibowli, Serilingampalli Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, to the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner claims to be a landless poor person and was assigned the house site admeasuring 110 square yards in the year 1983. The petitioner averred that under the Weaker Section Scheme, the Government has taken his site and constructed a quarter therein with an intention to allot the same to him. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he has paid the entire loan amount to respondent No.2 and obtained clearance certificate as far back as the year 2004, the respondents have not delivered the possession of the said quarter to him so far. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. The petitioner has not filed any material to show that before filing this Writ Petition, he has approached the respondents with a request for allotment of the quarter in question. It would have been more appropriate for him to make a demand to the respondents for such allotment before invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to make a representation to respondent No.2- District Manager for allotment of the quarter in question. On such representation being filed, if respondent No.2 finds that the petitioner is eligible for such allotment, he shall allot the same. However, if respondent No.2 finds that the petitioner is ineligible for such allotment, he shall pass an order, incorporating the reasons therefor, and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of such representation. Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.6522 of 2010, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 5th March, 2010 lur