1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO. 634 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. S.S.Manale, Advocate for the appellant. ............................. CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 12/10/2010 PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr. Manale, the learned counsel for the appellant. The learned counsel contends that the Court has not taken into consideration the pleadings, wherein the plaintiff, has in detail, given the particulars about the mis-representation and the fraud. He further submits that the plaintiff had reposed confidence in the defendants as the defendants were respectable persons of the village. The defendants took undue advantage of the confidence reposed by the plaintiff in them. According to him, even the consideration has not been proved. The evidence of hand writing expert has not been properly scanned, wherein he has categorically stated that the signatures on the 2 agreement of sale and the receipts are not similar to the signatures on the sale deed. 2. In light of the same, issue notices to the respondents. Call record and proceedings. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE knp/FA 634.10