IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11342 of 2009 TRIPURARI PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 1.9.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Admitted position is that the present petitioner did not deposit the renewal fee of his licence of deed writer by 31st of December, and thereafter till 31st March with late fee. If that be so, then the respondents have committed no error in passing the impugned order contained in annexure-3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to demonstrate or show any provisions with regard to condonation of delay in depositing the renewal fee after 31st March of the concerned year is permissible. In that view of the matter, no direction can be issued in favour of the petitioner. But if the petitioner demonstrates before the authority with any provision for condonation of delay beyond 31st March of the year concerned, they may still have a chance. This writ application stands disposed of with the limited relief as indicated above. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)