BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27.09.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.JYOTHIMANI Writ Petition(MD)No.11099 of 2011 M.Akila :Petitioner -Vs- 1.P.Muthkaruppan 2.The Inspector of Police,Thirverumbur Police Station, Thiruverumbur,Trichy. :Respondents PRAYER:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to close the FIR registered in Crime No.658/2011 on the file of the Thiruverumbur Police Station with regard to the woman missing complaint given by the 1s respondent namely, the petitioner's father in spite of petitioner's inputs and letter to him explaining her intention of being away from home and her parents and directing the 1st respondent namely, her father Muthukaruppan, her mother Vijayarani and her relatives not to disturb and harass the petitioner anymore as the petitioner has decided to be free from them and away from home. For Petitioner :Mr.P.Rathinam For 2nd Respondent :Mr.T.R.Janarthanam,Additional Government Pleader. ORDER The writ petition has been filed for a direction against the Inspector of Police, the second respondent to close the FIR registered in Crime No.658 of 2011 at the instance of the first respondent. The first respondent is the father of the petitioner. The petitioner has completed her B.E. Degree course and she is now aged 23 years as stated by her. 2.Today, the petitioner has appeared before me along with her counsel Mr.P.Rathinam and father of the petitioner namely the first respondent also along with the second respondent Inspector of Police. When I asked the petitioner as to whether she is willing to go back to her house with the first respondent, she has replied that she is settled in a home maintained by a Christian charitable institution and she is looking for a job and her apprehension is that if she goes to the first respondent, the father and her mother may compel her to get herself married in which she is not interested as on today. 3.In such view of the matter, inasmuch as the petitioner herself has voluntarily appeared before this Court, there is no purpose in keeping the FIR registered in Crime No.658 of 2011 pending. Accordingly, there will be a direction against the second respondent to close the FIR. However, the first respondent who is the father of the petitioner makes a plea that he may be permitted to see the petitioner being his daughter. However, the petitioner refused to disclose her place of residence for the obvious reason that there is a possibility on the part of the first respondent and the petitioner's mother to compel her to marry against her wish. However, as a matter of interim arrangement since the first respondent being the father got a right to see his daughter, it is open to the first respondent to contact Mr.P.Rathinam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and fix a time for meeting the petitioner in the chamber of the counsel weekly once. 4.Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Accounts) / TRUE COPY / Assistant Registrar To:The Inspector of Police,Thirverumbur Police Station,Thiruverumbur,Trichy. +1CC to The Special Government Pleader. SR.No.33871. RP/11.10.2011/1P/3C. Writ Petition(MD)No.11099 of 2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/