IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9500 of 2009 MUNCHUN SINGH & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 08.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioners, who are accused for offences punishable under sections 323, 354, 427 and 504/34 of the Penal Code as well as section 3(i)(x)(xi) of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons and no specific overt act has been alleged against the petitioners. He further submits that the allegation of pulling the Sari of the sister-in-law of the informant is against other accused persons and the learned court below has wrongly translated the term `Bepard’ used in the F.I.R. as `naked’. He also submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent and they are in custody since February, 2009. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition for bail is allowed. Accordingly, let both the petitioners, namely, (1) Munchun Singh and (2) Gunjan Singh be enlarged on bail on executing bail bonds of Rs.10,000.00( Rupees ten thousand only )each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Hajipur (Harijan) P.S. Case No. 255 of 2008. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )