IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43342 of 2010 PAPPU BIND @ PAPPU MAHTON, SON OF SOGARATH BIND. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR Advocate for petitioner: - Randhir Kumar Advocate for State :- Dr. Indiwar Kumari A.P.P. ----------- 02 14.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Barauni (Chakiya) P.S. Case No. 82 of 2009 initially, registered under Sections 395, 397 of the Indian Penal Code but subsequently, it was converted under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was arrested on 17.03.2009 and after two and half months of his arrest, he was put on Test Identification Parade in which two witnesses claimed to have identified the petitioner. Considering the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties the prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )