tiy- . v r' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cl N0. U\^ / 2010 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF THE INDIA PETITIONER 1S^\ ^) RB.'?^.-.--- • pte^«^^b? ^ o^(^ 5mt. Seema Devi Gupta Through:- Power of Attorney Holder Shiv Rantan Prasad Gupta S/o. Shri B.P. Gupta, 9 aged about 39 years, R/o. House No. 84, Sunder Nagar Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^r?^/ 1. Regional Transport Authority Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) ^.^s^Z^al 01- PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER. f: <?FR'il 9hW«h ^E~sr ^rqi^^r,.^-ci1-(H<i(o, fc«rii-H^< ^....uj..:£rb.^;...^.6ji.^,^^ -^200 ^n^i TT?W (^rf^5^) 3?il^? ^RT RT(ich ^^T^?T S?i^l<=ft ^\^ l'^-- SB: HON'BLE SHRI MANINDRA MCtHAN SHRIVASTAVA. J. 09.06.2010 Shri Anshul R. Shrivastava, le4 Shri Kishore Bhaduri, leam^d respondents. Submission of the learned col application of the petitioner for reg|jlar pending before the respondent - autll Taking into consideration the ] the petition itself is finally disposed o^ authorities shall decide the applicatio|i period. In view of the above, I.A.No.O|1 hearing the case during summer vac4 cti{^f<n<fli 'HW^ff ^f 'fe^t <Fn^i< ^3?f?w a?n^r ^med counsel for the petitioner, Additional Advocate G^iersd for ^insel for the petitioner is that though stage carriage permit has been lorities, the same is not being decided. |nature of grievance of the petitioner, with a direction that the responderat- ofthe petitionerwithin a reasonable for urgent hearing and I.A.No.02 for ^tion stand disposed of. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge VW^ ^^^wj^, ?-^ <^lk --FS/147—2/2010—1,00,000,