1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.62 of 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1431 OF 2009 New India Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Abdul s/o Ahmed @ Abdul Kadir and others _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Ms. P.G. Pali, Advocate for the applicant/appellant. Shri Sonwane, Advocate h/f Shri Bharat Vora, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : 18.02.2011. By the above Civil Application, the applicant/ appellant seeks condonation of delay of 139 days in filing the application for restoration of the Appeal. The reasons why the delay has occasioned, are mentioned in the Civil Application. The learned Counsel for respondent No.3 submits to the orders of the Court. Resultantly, the delay of 139 days in filing the application for restoration of the Appeal stands condoned. The Civil Application is allowed and disposed of. 2 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.190 OF 2011. By the above Civil Application, the applicant/ appellant seeks restoration of the Appeal against respondent No.3, which has been dismissed for non-prosecution on account of the conditional order dated 20-7-2010, the non removal of office objection was in respect of the respondent No.3. Respondent No.3 is now represented by the learned Counsel Shri Bharat Vora, who has filed his appearance. In my view, therefore, the Civil Application is required to be allowed and is allowed accordingly. The Appeal is restored against respondent No.3. Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE pma