HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.22098 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.12.2010 **** Seoti Devi . . . . Petitioner VS. HUDA & Anr. . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** Present: Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. RS Kundu, learned Addl. AG Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents. Having regard to the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to call upon the respondents to file their counter- replies/affidavits at this stage. (2). The petitioner is aggrieved by the resumption order dated 18.11.2010 (Annexure P6) passed by the Estate Officer HUDA Panchkula, which is admittedly appealable under the relevant provisions of the HUDA Act, 1977. (3). In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of by relegating the petitioner to the alternative remedy of statutory appeal. In case the petitioner files the appeal within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, the appellate authority is directed to decide the same on merit, however, without entertaining the objection regarding limitation, within a period of three months thereafter. (4). Till the petitioner’s appeal is decided, no third party right shall be created in the subject plot. (5). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 13.12.2010 vishal shonkar (SURYA KANT) JUDGE