IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.350 of 2009 RAM SINGESHWAR SINGH & ANR. Versus SURENDRA SINGH & ORS. ----------- 02/ 12.02.2009 All the defects as pointed out in the stamp report have already been removed by learned counsel for the appellants-petitioners. This petition has been filed for restoration of S.A. No. 228 of 2005, which stood dismissed for default due to non-compliance of peremptory order of this court dated 08.12.2008 by which two weeks time was allowed to the appellants-petitioners to file interlocutory application with regard to defect nos.1 and 2 vide stamp report dated 10.04.2008. From the averments made by learned counsel for the appellants-petitioners and the statements made in the petition, it appears that genuine reasons have been shown due to which the said order could not be complied within the time prescribed but it was complied subsequently on 21.01.2009 and I.A. No. 404 of 2009 was filed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is allowed and S.A. No. 228 of 2005 is restored to its original file and number. harish/ ( S.N.Hussain, J.)