IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No. 71583-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: FEBRUARY 20, 2007 Harpal Singh and others ...PETITIONERS VERSUS State of Punjab ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr.Veneet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.N.S.Gill, AAG, Punjab. ... The petitioners apprehending their arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No. 289 dated 18.10.2006 registered under Sections 326/324/341/323/148/149 IPC at Police Station Sadar, District Amritsar, have filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail. While issuing notice of motion on November 16, 2006, arrest of the petitioners was stayed subject to their joining the investigation. I have heard the counsel for the parties. Counsel for the petitioners contends that petitioners No.1 to 3 have been attributed simple injuries, whereas petitioner No.4 was alleged to have given a grievous injury on the leg of the injured. Counsel contends that it is a case of version and cross version. Counsel for the petitioners further contends that in terms of the interim order dated November 16, 2006, the petitioners have joined the investigation. Counsel for the respondent-State does not dispute this fact and the fact that in the cross case, petitioner No.4- Ranbir Singh @ Gurlal Singh @ Lali has received six injuries, one of which is grievous in nature. However, it has not been disputed that the other petitioners have been attributed only simple injuries. In view of the above, the interim order dated November 16, Crl.Misc.No. 71583-M of 2006 -2- 2006 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions. Disposed of accordingly. February 20, 2007 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE