IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.13430 of 2011 Date of Decision : August 24, 2011. Narinder Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : None for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks quashing of the order whereby some recovery is being effected from him. Neither the order nor the reason for such recovery has been specifically disclosed in the writ petition though it appears that the recovery pertains to an amount drawn by the petitioner towards family pension even after his appointment as a Constable on compassionate ground. If that were the reasons, no fault can be found with the recovery of the amount already paid to the petitioner. Be that as it may, in the absence of proper pleadings, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the competent authority to treat this writ CWP No.13430 of 2011 [2] petition as a representation on behalf of the petitioner and dispose of his claim in the light of the Full Bench decision of this Court in Budh Ram and others versus State of Haryana and others, decided on 22.5.2009. Ordered accordingly. The petitioner is directed to deposit two copies of the writ petition with the Registry to be sent to the respondents alongwith a certified copy of this order for necessary compliance. Dasti. August 24, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE