IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 19TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 18805 of 2006(L) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- C.K. CHANDRASEKHARAN, CHERINKAL HOUSE, KALLINGALCHIRA, PATTANCHERI P.O., CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K. SRI.LIJU. M.P. RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT, PALAKKAD. 3. THE SALES TAX OFFICER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD. 4. THE TAHSILDAR (R.R), CHITTUR, PALAKKAD. 5. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PATTANCHERI VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. R1 TO R5 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.K. GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.18805 of 2006 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T ---------------------- This writ petition is filed in the year 2006 challenging recovery steps on the premise that a second revision is pending before the authority against the order of penalty issued under Section 45A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act (KGST Act). It is noticed that on 18.7.2006 this court has granted a stay subject to condition of the petitioner remitting a sum of Rs.5 lakhs. But the matter was not seen moved before this court after July 2006. When the matter was taken up for consideration on today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has no instructions from the petitioner. He seeks time to get further instructions. 2. It is presumed that the issue no more survives for consideration. Accordingly the writ petition is closed. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. okb