J^S' ^g's.' IN THB mGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 2,0'2'"__-.---.^o<\; WRIT PBTITIQN (C) N0.7 _QF2&ie- " PETITIONER -.* ^."^ ^^^ .'^'et/yi\.^''"'i1-'''".'" "'" l**' ^^^.^ rt>^w <it ..«•' y^ ^ .RESPONDENTS f^ Korba Greative Career .Society," an ,Edueatidnal. Society duly registered Under the Chhattisgarh Societies Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973,under Registration No.CGState/ 1701, ^ated 15-6-2007 havingits pffice at Indira Stadium., Transport Nagar, Korba (Chhattisgarh), through its Director, Prof,: ' Pradeep. , ; Jain. VERSUS 1<^ State ; of. , ChhattisgarK ThrQUgh'-.' tB.e SeesrefaFy,, ^•.EtepaStineiif^of^^eyenu^&^ Cala&iity' Management, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan' Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) • / . ~ -lf ^,^.^.^..;'::-,-^,,'''-.: ;,^ 2. The , Gollector, District (•Korba [Chhattisgarh) 3. Tahsildar /Nazul Officer Revenue District Korba (Chhaftisgarh) '"" ^<^.^' ',...,:-.'..:' .-• •" .•^•:.'. ..'•«.. •. ••• " ^•.,- \. " A ' SSafy£triarayahMishra, S/o' Late , Vaidyanath Mishra, ; Aged about 57 years, R/6 . " 243/2, NearElecfricSuh Station, Shivajinagar, Korba (Chhattisgarh) WRrr PETITION UNBER SICTIGLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIAFOR ISSUENCE OF WRFT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, OR OiRDER(S), DIRECTION(S) ETC The petitioner above-named most respectfully submits as under: : . ; ~ ^i-- I-IXSH^QU.RT; OISC;HMAFTISGARH:BII-/!(SB.IR V»F?tTR>ETITlQI'<l((a:N<3.3ei30QR2011 PETITrONER Korba CreativeCareerSdGiety •.Vgrscis; :.;;;';'':'.: :: ' • ."1:-':'::' 1: RESF'QNDENTS SfateofGljhattisgarh&Others (WritFBtition under Article226of the Constitutiorroflhilia)" Single Behch : Hon'tile Shri Satish'K.AgnitTOtri,^ Present:- SMri a°ishish Shrivastava, Advocate for the petiti8n®r. ShTiSumesh Bajaj,t3flvt.AdvoGatef6rtheState. ORDER - 4. 5. •TR (Passed on this 16l" day of November, 2011) Heard learned cbunselforftTe parties. • Gase of the petitioner is that thte land in disput& ws& duly ;Slloltecl to the petitionet by order dated 31-10-2009 (Annexure - P71) for thie purposectfe^blishingaGOHegebuiiaingandcaltipusW^ ;R^p(»rid^t/ISI®.4Rerei filedia ^ WP.^ WWW:2Wa.'{Satyanarayan Mishra^OtherSy. Sfateaf' C^ftaffi^ff) & Oftgr^ Ghallengirtg fhe legality and vSHdity pf^^^^t^^^^^ orderdatgcl 31-10-2009 wtiereunderthelandinquestiohwasalldtted fo flre petitiorier herein (fespontlent No.5 therein). This Court after hearing the parties, directed the Coliector, Korba, to consider the representation after Gonsidering fhe case of tlie concerned parties and pass an appropriate order. Accarelingly, on •the! repFes&ntation, the eollector, after having c6nsicler®3th& isase ofthe respective pafties, rejected th®Fepresentation of th'e respo^naeint Na.4 herein by ortlsr dated 22-2-2011 (Annexure-P/5). Now the instarrt petition Has been filed by fhe petitionerSayinathatthe /'.•''-:-.... responderit Nb.4 is interFering wifh the possessioh ofthe petitioiner on th®abovesiatedlandforwhieharepresentationhasbe6nmacl^by,tlTe; petiticmert&(heCo[lec^orandotherRevenueAufh[()rities,butneacai^^ has been taken by the concerned authorities on the repreSentation submitteCby the petitioner. Thus, ttris petition. ^ ^ Gowri Be th^.asil m^, ifthe pertitioneri&;aggrieved l^ ifftervention 8f ariy other party over Ihe land in dispute, fh'e ;pi6titionSF ^maiy apprc^lt the apprQpnatejuriScliGttonale^^ TfflsG&urt in exeroise ol^itssxtraorelin^jurisdictioft under^^^ oftlre Goristitution cif India cannot issue any direction with regard to_ the aibovestated allegatiahs made tiiy tt-rg petitiongr, as no fiifringernent ofanyStatuf6iy,]egalor;GonMifutiDnalng^ raised in this petition. As an upshot, fh&writ petition, being bereft of merit.is liable lo beand hisherebydismissed.asnotinaintainable. :-S<I/-.1:.:'.-^-. K.Agnthotri Judge