IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.15046 of 2004 Between: 1 Kolli Tirupathi Rao S/o. Poli Naidu R/o. 11-63, Gudem Street, Seethanagaram Vijayanagaram District. 2 Smt.Kolli Chinnari W/o. Kolli Tirupathi Rao ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Superintendent of Poloice, Vizianagaram District Vizianagaram. 2 The Sub Inspector of Police, Seethanagaram P.S Vizianagaram District. 3 Mandal Revenue Officer, Seethanagaram Mandal, Seethanagaram Vizianagaram District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in interfering with the personal liberty of the petitioners guaranteed by the Constitution of India under Article 19-e and g of the Constitution of India and also violation of Article 300-A of the constitution of India, consequently direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere into the administration of school of the petitioner in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KURITIBHASKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MPL} THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.15046 of 2004 ORDER: Heard on either side. The petitioners seek to issue a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent-the Sub-Inspector of Police, Seethanagaram P.S. Vizianagaram District, in interfering with their personal life and liberty guaranteed by the Constitution of India under Article-19(e) and (g), as illegal and arbitrary. This Court, on 24.08.2004, before admitting the writ petition, passed an interim direction to the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners in respect of the land in question, without following due process of law, and the same order is still in force. In view of the said interim order, no orders need be passed in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, in terms of the interim order dated 24.08.2004. No order as to costs. _____________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 17.04.2008 Dsr .... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 Superintendent of Poloice, Vizianagaram District Vizianagaram. 2 The Sub Inspector of Police, Seethanagaram P.S Vizianagaram District. 3 Mandal Revenue Officer, Seethanagaram Mandal, Seethanagaram Vizianagaram District. 4 2. 2CCs to 5. 2CD copies