CR No. 8338 of 2010. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CR No. 8338 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 21.12.2010 Ravinder Pal Singh and others. ....Petitioner. Vs. Locha Ram and others. ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present:- Mr. Ravinder Pal Singh, petitioner in person. ****** HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) CM No. 32394-CII of 2010. Application is allowed as prayed for. CR No. 8338 of 2010 The challenge in the present petition is an order passed by the learned trial court on 14.10.2010, whereby the evidence of the plaintiff-petitioner was closed by an order. It is pointed out by the petitioners that case was fixed earlier on 31.07.2010 when the Presiding Officer of the court was on medical leave and the case was adjourned for 14.10.2010. On the said date, the petitioner had to go to Jalandhar to attend a case as he is a practicing Advocate and therefore, he could not appear on 14.10.2010 when the case was fixed for evidence. The petitioners have filed suit for permanent injunction CR No. 8338 of 2010. 2 in the year 2005. They have ad-interim injunction in their favour. The petitioners have challenged the order dated 14.10.2010 after more than two months when earlier the case was fixed for defendant's evidence on 23.11.2010. From the conduct of the petitioners, it appears that the interest of the plaintiffs is to delay the proceedings. Therefore, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the learned trial court which may warrant any interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Petition dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) 21.12.2010 JUDGE aj