IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8704 of 2010 GUDDU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.03.2010 Heard. The case is under Sections 366 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that the informant’s wife was taken away by the petitioner and his sister Kaili and subsequently one Murtez also joined at Delhi where she was kept in a room and that when she (victim) informed her cousin brother he came and she returned with him. Learned counsel submits that the victim’s statement had been recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. and it at Annexure-2. It is submitted that the victim does not allege any criminal activity against the petitioner. The learned counsel submits that it was a consented affair between the victim and the petitioner. Further submission is that co-accused Bibi Kaili has been allowed bail by this court vide order dated 24.11.2009 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 37777 of 2009. The learned A.P.P. does not point out any other material against the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Guddu is admitted to bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection Korha P.S. Case No. 143 of 2009. (C.M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-