IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 8TH JUNE 2010 / 18TH JYAISTHA 1932 RP.No. 424 of 2010(M) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.7925/2010 Dated 16/03/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- Y.GEETHA, W/O.SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE, RESIDING AT PUTHETHU HOUSE, MUTHUKULAM KARTHIGAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KERALA WATER AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, JALA BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, HARIPAD. BY S.C. SHRI M.DINESH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.No.424/2010 in W.P.(C) No. 7925 of 2010 - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of June, 2010. JUDGMENT The writ petitioner is the review petitioner. The writ petition was disposed of directing the Managing Director of the Kerala Water Authority to consider Ext.P4 representation filed by the petitioner and take appropriate decision after notice to the petitioner/her husband and the Muthukulam Grama Panchayat and any other parties within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. 2. It is pointed out in the review petition that the action for closing the public water tap was presumed to have been taken by the Committee of the Panchayat and when the petitioner applied for a copy of the resolution, she was given a reply stating that on 16.3.2009 no meeting of the Committee has taken place. It is therefore contended that the entire action is per se illegal. 3. Already, the representation filed by the petitioner was directed to be considered by the Managing Director, with notice to the petitioner and the Panchayat. Therefore, while the matter is being considered, this aspect also can be brought to the notice of the Managing Director. It is submitted rp 424/2010 2 that so far no action has been initiated by the Managing Director to conduct a hearing. 4. Learned Standing Counsel for the Water authority submitted that the Water Authority is yet to get a copy of the judgment. The petitioner will forward a copy of the judgment to the respondents for compliance. The review petition is accordingly disposed of. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/