Niir;i: Hlltlii BiK lili] IHI. ^ ^ay'l HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BJLASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLESHRt S.R. NAYAK, C.J. WRIT PETITIONNO. 2932 OF 2005 PET!TI c< X,?' Vs. '3 \~fi ^•'- Uttamchand Dhariwa! & Company, Raipur (C.G.) Through its partner—Inderchand Dhariwal, . S/o. Late Shri Uttamchand \ Dhariwal, aged about 6Q years, 'R/o. 45/4, Sadar Bazar, Raipur (C.G.) , Laxman Sahu,S/o. Konda Sahu, Aged about 65 years. Jagar Ram, S/o. iSomsai Sahu, Aged about 58 yearS. Bhagat Ram, S/o. Kejau ram, Aged about 70 yaars. 2 to 4 R/o. ViHage Jora, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) The State of Chhattisgarh, through Its Secretary, Department of Revenue, IVIantralaya, D.K.S. Shawan, Raipur (C-.G.) Collecfor,Raipur(C.G.) Additional Tahsildar, Raipur (C.G.) P.N.B. Farmers Welfare Trust, Punjab Nationai Bank, Kachhari Chowk, Raipur(C.G.) Present: ShriAmrito Das, learnedcounsel forthe petitioners. Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, learned G.A. for the State. (ORALQRDER) (Passedon 16 February,2006) This writ petition is directed against the interlocutory order made by the Government of Chhattisgarh dated 27.04.2005 vacating the ^interim stay eariier granted oh 09.03.2QQ5 in a review petition filed by the petitioners herein see.king review of the order of the Govemment datjsd 1^1 si^: 'tilj' fci' .1: ^-. ^, 18.11.2002. The grievance of the petitioners is that ff the order of the Government dated 27.04.2005 is allowed to stand, the respondent No,4 Is 'ikely to put up construction in the subject property and therefore, it is just and necessary to maintain status-quo pending disposa! of the review petition filed by the petitioners. (2) Having heard learned counselforthe parties, I thlnkthatthe ends of justice would be met by dirfecting the State Government to dispose ofthe review petition, v/ithin a time-frame and til! then directingthe parties to maintaln the status-quo that obtains as on today., !n the result, 1 disposs of this writ petition directing the State Government to hear and dispose of the review petition filed by the petitioner on 19.01 .2005 seeking review of its order dated 18.11.2002 as expeditiously as possible, under any circumstance, within a period of three months from the date of recejpt of a copy of this order. !n the meanwhi!e,~status-quo that obtains as on today, in al! material aspects, shall be maintained by the parties. N'o Sd/- Chief Justice ..••i&y •: •i • ::^1;1: ;:i;j:ii :jii^l! .i^uauiui-AJiiiti laii H!illld liii tiill ,CM