IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH * * * * * LPA No. 1398 of 2011 Date of decision : August 10,2011 * * * * * Smt. Satyawanti ..........Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others ........Respondents * * * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH * * * * * Present: Mr. Gurpreet Singh and Mr. Susheel Gautam, Advocates for the appellant. * * * * * 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? M.M KUMAR, J. The instant appeal has been filed under Clause X of Letters Patent for setting aside the judgment dated 3.6.2011 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the writ petitioner was denied allotment of 100 sq. yards plot on the ground that she has already a pucca house in the village. It was held by the learned Single Judge that the allotment of plots is meant for persons who are without houses. The Scheme dated 1.2.2008 could not have come to the rescue of those who already own pucca house. The appellant admittedly has a pucca house and she cannot invoke the provisions of the Scheme for allotment of the 100 square yards land. The learned Single Judge has committed no error of law or on facts in that regard. There is no merit. Dismissed. ( M.M KUMAR ) JUDGE August 10, 2011 ( GURDEV SINGH ) ritu JUDGE