IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 354 of 2009 (M/S) Thakur Dan Singh Bist Trust. ………. Petitioner Versus Manu Maharani Hotels Ltd. ………. Respondent Mr. Veer Kuamr Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Siddhartha Sah, Advocate for the respondent. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. On this matter coming up for consideration, the learned counsel for the parties have suggested that this writ petition be disposed of as settled and the following agreed order be passed: The Suit is fixed before the learned Trial Court on 21st March 2009 for the hearing of Order 7 Rule 11 Application. Because the petitioner / plaintiff expects its SLP to come up for consideration before the Supreme Court in the next week, it is directed that the learned Trial Court shall adjourn the matter already fixed before it on 21st March, 2009 to a date in the week commencing 30th March, 2009. If, by then, any order of the Supreme Court has been passed, undoubtedly it shall govern the proceedings, but if no order is passed by the Supreme Court till then, the matter shall not be adjourned by the Trial Court and the Trial Court shall proceed to hear and dispose of Order 7 Rule 11 Application in the light of the directions contained and the observations made in this Court’s order dated 31st October, 2008 passed in Civil Revision No. 21 of 2008. The writ petition stands disposed of. (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 17.03.2009 G