IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.16463 of 2010 Date of Decision : September 14, 2010. Kuldeep Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.G.S.Brar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.K.D.S.Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.K.D.Sidhu, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct the respondents to consider his application dated 19.8.2010 (Annexure P-2) for registration of his marriage. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to C.W.P.No .16463 of 2010 2 dispose of the same with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner-cum- Marriage Officer, Fatehgarh Sahib, that as and when the petitioner and his alleged wife appear before him alongwith the requisite documents and, subject to verification of valid solemnization of their marriage, the Marriage Officer shall register their marriage and issue the requisite certificate within a period of two weeks of such presentation. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. September 14, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE