IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 23746 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 15.09.2011 Amit ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Rakesh Nagpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. On 08.08.2011, while issuing of notice of motion, following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner were recorded:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the allegation in the present FIR are totally false. In fact, the mother of the petitioner earlier lodged a case registered against the complainant in the present FIR. Though it is alleged that the Axe was used while hitting the complainant on the shoulder but all injuries on his person were found with blunt weapon. Three of them were merely compliant of pain.” Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Ishwar Singh, submitted that the petitioner has already joined investigation and his custo- dial interrogation is not required. Considering the aforesaid fact, interim bail granted to the peti- tioner on 08.08.2011, is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 15.09.2011 sharmila