c^; ^ (D 30 IN THE HQN'BLE HIGILC_OURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATLBILASPUR W,P^_(S1NP^ 6'^7^''_2007 Petitioner ..<^. ^y^ ^ff^y ^y ^s&^ <<-o.." ^y ^^•- Versus Respondents .,^-—-^-<<.,i,_ •v^41s i!??S<?^'%, ^r-^< '%. ».-,..•»""' .0%. .o* 'i"' !-J t/f~ -» ^ •?":^' \^^2 ^" ^ > ^' S.N.Tiwari S/o Shri Ashok Nath Tiwari, Aged about 51 . years, Working as forestor Forest range Latori, Circle Ambikapur, Forest Division, South Sarguja, R/o Bouripara Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja-(C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Forest Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur- (C.G.) Under Secretary State of Chhattisgarh, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur-fC.G.) The Divisional Forest Officer, South Sarguja Division, Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja-(C.G.) Range Officer, Ambikapur Range, Distt. Sarguja-(C.G.) Ramesh Lal Soni, Forestor, Prem Nagar, Sarguja Forest Division, Distt. Sarguja-(C.G.) / -'^ ~^\=? WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI PROHIBITION ETC -u; HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BILASPUR Sinaie Bench : Hon'bie Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker PETiTIONER Writ Petition (Sl No. 6672 of 2007 S.N. Tiurari RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisaarh & others ^. Shri V-K. Pandev. counsel forthe oetitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Go'vt. Advocate for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTSTUTiON GF SNDiA CLRDER 'nc n? onnQ^. \w.ui ,AU^^ With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finallv. Challenae in the instant writ oetition is to the order dated 31.82007(Annexure P-1) passed bv the State Government wherebv the respondent No. 5 - Ramesh Lal Soni has been directed to be posted at the place of petitloner 1-e. Assistant Ranae Officer, Latori Circte, South Sarauja, Divlsion Ambikapur, accordina to the Detitioner it is In vloiation ofthe transfer Dolicv. This Court entertainina the arievance ofthe petitioner had aranted stav in his favour vide order dated 15.11.2007. In view ofthe fact that this petition was filed on 27.10 2007 and stav was also aranted in favour of the petitioner, the transfer order. so far as it relates to the petitioner is herebv quashed However, the State Government would be at liberty to pass an order if the administrative exiqencv so warrant. With the above observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge D/-