IN TH^HIGH COURT OF .lUDIC/VTURE KX CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRTT PETITION N0. 2-5^5 /2QQ6 pmmoNER Versus RESPONDENTS ,CT'\.-' '^..•' . ^^s/ ^.••' (>'. ^yy y J?r. .•••'' l^y S9 f ^ •^ Smt. Shashikala, W/o Ramnarayan Aged about 24 years, R/o village Marghatti, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 1) State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2) The Collector, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 3) Additional Collector, Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4) Sub Divisional Officer, Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 5) Bharti W/o Sukhiram 6) Kantibai W/o Nakdau 7) Janki W/o Shivnandan 8) Rambai W/o Rameshwar Patel 9) Salikabai W/o Bajrangbali Yadav Respondent Nos.§rto^.arereside in village Marghatti, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 10) N.L. Darshan, Presiding Officer, Polling No. 142, Upper Teacher, Girls School, Sakti, Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 11) O.P. Jaiswal, Presiding Officer, Polling No. 143, Upper Grade Teacher, Girls School, Baradwar, District Janjgir 12) T.R. Sahu, Presiding Officer, Polling No. 144, Head Master, Middle School Sakreli Baradwar, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 13) H. Lakra, Election Officer, Janpad Panchayat Malkharauda and Tahsildar Malkharauda, Tahsil '^ &(> Malkharauda, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) WRaT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA • ,.: The petitioner n'afhed above most respectfully begs to prefer present writ as under: XI-HC-78 *ii*iwi awicb ^sf "i||i||c)A|, »Tnu'is,Ridiuy q^ ...u-;..yr;.^.-?.'.:?.^ ^ 200^, 3ll^l 4a<n ('i?^^') 3T1^T?iTR-fi* crarsii^i <»itii+ 19-6-200 Swv1^ ^^ gTBRKnfN'W^T •. Satish Chandra Verm; Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, Goverr|menl Advocate for the State/respondents No.1 to4. Heard both the counsel. By this writ petition under| petitioner has questioned legalit^ 23-8-2005 whereby the applicatji rejected by ftie Specified Officer. Learned counsel for the making a limited prayer beoause] Sarpanch, Village Panohayat: M( Champa in which respondent No| an applfcation for recount of vot| Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, bul t!1 and on which the petitioner filed application before the S.D.O. anc| same shall be decided oniy aft^ the matter is pending, therefore| election petition. The prayer made by ieari The matter pertains to the yea respondent No.4 shall decide th eariyas possible within next six n^onths, in accordance with law. Wrth Ihe direction aforesai «hwi<vi'ifl-<iitirii'ffrs^ <.Ri^i< ^sri^iTsn^T counsel for the petitioner. Article 226/227 of the Constitulion of India, the propriety and correctness of the order dated on for recount of votes of the petitioner was petitioner submitted that at this slage, he is the petilioner oontesled election to Ihe post of irghatti, Tehsit: Maikharauda, District: Janjgir- 5 was declared elected. The petitioner moved ss under Section 122 (1) of the Chhattisgarh p prayer of the petitioner was not acceded to election petition in the Court of Sub Divisional Officer, Sakti who issued notic^. Thereafter, the petitioner again made an thai has been rejected on the ground that the r recording the evidence. Learned counsel further submitted that thereafter, Ifie election petition is not being proceeded and respondent No.4 be directed to decide the ed counsel for the petitioner is just and fair. 2005 and the election petitions are even otherwise, supposed to be decid^d at the earliest. Therefore, H is expected that ^ election petition of the petitioner herein, as , the petition stands disposed of. Sdf- L.C. 6^ado° juciS® ^