1 IN THE HIGH COUT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1658 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1443 OF 2004 Ankush Mahadeo Parte & anr..... Appellants Vs. Ramchandra Krishna Parte ..... Respondent Ms. Madhuri Gaikwad for the appellants. Mr. B.K. Raje for the respondent . CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J. DATE : 14th June, 2010. P.C. : 1. This application is for seeking permission to applicant/appellant no.2 to file fresh agency agreement in the office of the Court Receiver, Bombay on the same terms and conditions agreed earlier. It is not in dispute that the applicant is paying regularly the amount of royalty of Rs. 21,000/- every month since 1-4-2005. However, fresh agency agreement was not filed through oversight. 2. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. After hearing the counsel for the parties, I am satisfied that there was mistake on the part 2 of the applicant in not filing fresh agency agreement in the office of the Court Receiver. Considering the fact that the applicants are regularly paying royalty of Rs. 21,000/- every month, the application deserves to be allowed. Hence civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) with no order as to costs. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant will serve the copy of the fresh agency agreement upon the learned counsel for the respondent. [R.G. KETKAR, J.]