THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.17059 of 2009 DATED: 01.07.2010 Between: Naredla Rama Devi .. Petitioner And The Superintendent of Police, Krishna, Machilipatnam and others. .. Respondents ORDER: Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of respondents 1 to 4, police officials, in executing the non-bailable warrants issued against respondents 5 and 6 herein, accused in C.C.No.101 of 2002 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tiruvuru, the petitioner, defacto complainant in the said case, filed the present writ petition. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home produced the written instructions obtained by him from the Assistant Sub Inspector of Police, A. Konduru Police Station, Krishna District, wherein it is stated that N.B.Ws. were issued against respondents 5 and 6 herein and one N. Kittayamma on 17.02.2009 and, pursuant thereto, the then Sub Inspector of Police, A. Konduru Police Station, deputed staff for execution of the warrants, who proceeded to Atlapragada Village of A. Konduru Mandal and found that the accused are not residing there. Thereafter, as the enquiries revealed that the accused are residing in Gattu Bhimavaram Village of Vatsavai Mandal, the police surprised the house of said N. Kittayamma in Gattu Bimavaram Village, but found the house locked and the enquiries revealed that the said N.Kittayamma alone is residing in the said house and respondents 5 and 6 are not residing in the village. It is further stated that the police made sincere and sustained efforts to execute the N.B.Ws. against respondents 5 and 6. Thereafter, as per the directions of the trial Court, the police served notices to sureties and returned to the Court the N.B.Ws. issued against respondents 5 and 6. Pursuant thereto, the sureties appeared and took time to produce respondents 5 and 6 before the Court, but however, ultimately, they expressed their inability to produce respondents 5 and 6 and paid surety amount of Rs.4,000/- each to the Court. It is further stated that, on 29.06.2009, the defence counsel requested the trial Court to send N.B.Ws. to the Superintendent of Police, Krishna, for execution, but no such warrants have been received in A.Konduru Police Station, so far. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondents 5 and 6 are very much available in their village, but the respondent police, particularly, respondents 3 and 4, Inspector of Police, Tiruvuru Circle and Sub Inspector of Police, A. Konduru Police Station respectively, are not evincing interest to execute the N.B.Ws. against them. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondent police and considering the written instructions referred above, without keeping the writ petition pending, I deem it appropriate to dispose it of, with a direction to the 1st respondent- Superintendent of Police, Krishna, Machilipatnam, to depute a special party to execute the N.B.Ws. issued against respondents 5 and 6 herein, in C.C.No.101 of 2002 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tiruvuru, at the earliest. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. __________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 1st July, 2010 IBL