IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1235 of 2010 1. DINESH RAI 2. MAHESH RAI, BOTH SONS OF MAHINDRA RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KORBADHA 3. RAJEEV KUMAR, SON OF SURENDRA RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BEJHA DEEH,, ALL OF P.S. AND DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR. …PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR …OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2. 19.08.2010 Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioners have been held guilty and sentenced under sections 498A,323 and 341 IPC by order dated 29.04.2010, passed by learned SDJM, Samastipur in G.R.No.264/08 (T.R.No.1125/2010). Aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction, they preferred appeal being Cr.Appeal No.26/2010. The said appeal was heard along with Cr.Appeal No.22/2010 (Umesh Rai vs. State). Learned appellate court by judgment and order dated 30.06.2010, dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioners with modification in sentence. The punishment of R.I. for two years recorded under section 498A IPC was reduced to R.I. for six months. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are the relative of the husband. The husband has already served out the sentence. It is submitted that there is no direct allegation against them. Learned APP, on the other hand, supported the impugned judgment. It is contended that there is/are concurrent 2 findings of guilt recorded by two courts below which have not been demonstrated to be perverse and/or perfunctory meriting no interference. This Court finds that adequate relief has already been granted to the petitioners. There is no merit in this application which is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )