In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh F.A.O. No. 3059 of 2008 Date of decision: November 25, 2009 Sushila and others .. Appellants Vs. Devender Kumar and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. R.C. Gupta, Advocate for the respondent No.3. A.N. Jindal, J This appeal is directed against the order dated 13.3.2008 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Faridabad, dismissing the claim petition filed by the appellants-claimants. The rashness and negligence of the respondent in this case do not stand proved as no name of the driver or the owner finds mentioned in the first part of the FIR, but in the end name of Daulat Ram son of Rati Ram of village Khore was inserted as owner of the tractor. But, at the time of filing of the claim petition, the name of the owner was mentioned as Nandu and driver as Devender Kumar. Nandu is stated to be owner of the tractor “Mahendra”, whereas, according to the police record, the accident took place as a result of rash and negligent driving of “Eicher” tractor. As such, the pleadings are contradictory with the evidence led by the claimant. Thus, it transpires that the Tribunal was right in declining the claim petition. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. November 25, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge