x v ITIONER i i I ‘ 3 i H CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 1 E V I RESPONDENTS :1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through the 1 RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE 'CONSTITUTION OF INDIA sB Hon’ble Sim Sansh K, Agmhatn, resent: 1 Shri Rakesh Pandey, Advocate for the pentxoner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State. Smt. Hamida Siddique, Advocate for the respondent No. 2 & 3. I eto the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. In View of the foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for he t petitioner, nothing remains for adjudication. Consequently, the petition stande:disposed of. WRIT PETITION (S) No. 2‘966 of2009 Raja Babu Badhel S/o Shri Megha Ramcharan Badhel, aged about 29 years, R/o Kumharpara, Karbala, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C. VERSUS Secretamy, Urban Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur C.G. 2. The Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, Through the Commissioner, Bilaspur District Brlaspur C G i 3. The Health Oficer Mun1c1pal Corporation Brlaspm District Bilaspui C G i ORDER ORAL) (Passed on 25 day of June, 2009) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest the petition on merits. However, the petitioner prays that the respondent authorities may be directed to decide his pending representations, as expeditiously as possible. 2. Smt. Siddique, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 and 3 submits that if the representations dated 06.07.2005 and 05.09.2008 (Annexure P/2 Golly), 'the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law on its own merits, within a period of four weeks from ' IGH COURT OF H P G. W