IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.1639 of 2009 Date of decision: February 2, 2009 Surender Singh ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. D.S. Rawat, Advocate for the petitioner. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) The petitioner has challenged the cancellation of transfer order on the ground that the same has been done on the recommendation of some party worker even though the private respondent had served in the same district for the last many years. It is not the case of the petitioner that private respondent was posted at Samalkha, District Sonepat for the last many years. It is to be noticed that earlier the petitioner was posted at Nilokheri, District Karnal and transferred to Samalkha, District Sonepat and it was that order which has been cancelled. In my opinion, even if there is some truth in the allegations made by the petitioner yet the order does not visit the petitioner with such prejudicial effect that it is a case where this Court should interfere in the exercise of extra-ordinary CWP No.1639 of 2009 -2- jurisdiction. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. February 02, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE