:SK^i;3^^%!^it^^ sRtBy ??^'H?s^^^ ^' H1GH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH: BILASPUR SiNGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. WritPetition(S)No:6737of2007 • PETITIONER S.N.Shukta.S/oLate^ShriDatadeen Shukla, Aged about 62 years, Manager f Sahkari Vipnan Samiti Maryadit, . Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Sahkari Vipnan . Sanstha Maryadit, Kawardha through its President 'SahKari Vipnan Sanstha Maryadit, Kgwardha, DistrictKabirdham(C;G.) ' 2. Shri Chote Lal Chandravifanshi, S/o Late Shri Gunagar Sirigh Charidrawanshi, President of Sahkari Vipnan Sanstha Maryayit, Kawardha, District Kabirclham Writ Petition under Article.226 ofthe ConstitLition of India - RESPONDENTS Present; Shri C.D. Sharma, .oounsel forthe petitioner. ORALORDER (Passedon17'nNovember,2007) • Heard. ^ Leamed oounsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a daily wages employee woFking in the Sahkari Vipnan Sanstha Maryadit, Kawardha. His sen'ices were terminated by orderdated 14-09-2007 (Annexure P/4). After the above order passed by the.Chairman, an order dated 15-09-2007 (AnnexureP/5) waspassed by Sanohalak Mandal and it was recommended that the .earlier order should be cancelled.and the ^^ .: . .. . ^ • • - . .. ' ... petitioner wasallowed to work. As a opnsequence of said recommendation an order dated 15-09-2007 waspassed and the eariier order dated 14-09- *" ' . . • 2007 was oancelled. But thereafter the impugned order dated 08-10-2007 has again been passed by the Chairman and it has been directed thatthe petitioner should tew- handedover the charge to oneShri Bahorik Prasad Tiwari and he should be relieved by the jmpugned order. Against the said order the petitioner has filed this petition. Admittedly the matter relates to the -.•esswyssssy. :rr •^^-ctvsse^ss.sisasw^.': • Co-operative Sooiety and the provisions of Co-operative Societies Act and the Rules and bye-laws framed areapplicable inthecaseofthepetitioner; In view of the above, 1 am not incljned to entertain this petitlon at this stage and the same is disposed of. However (he petitioner would be at liberty to avail appropriate statutory remedy available to him under the law and to raise all his grievance against the orderdated 08-10-2007. Sd?- Sunii teuniafSiriha se.: ; ^"