IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.921 of 2007 1. Narad Yadav son of Late Fakir Yadav 2. Amar Nath Yadav 3. Pawan Yadav (Petitioner nos.2 and 3 are sons of Narad Yadav.) All r/o vill. Bhandai Chak, P.O. & P.S. Bounsi, Dist. Banka. ---- Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Chandeshwar Prasad Singh @ C.P.Singh father’s name not known to the petitioner, Sub Inspector of police, Bounsi Police station P.S.& P.O. Bounsi, Dist. Banka. ----Opp.Parties. ----------- 05. 07.07.2010 Heard both sides. The application filed under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking discharge from the charge punishable under Section 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substance Act has been considered and rejected by the impugned order dated 02.04.2007, passed in Sessions Trial no. 194 of 2007. It is stated that there is no report of the ballistic expert on record. It is next submitted that there is no valid sanction in terms of Section 7 of the said Act. Learned trial Court, considered aforesaid submissions and has found and held that on these grounds alone, the application seeking discharge cannot be allowed when there is/are sufficient material otherwise on record supporting the prosecution case. In my view, learned Court below has not committed any illegality by passing the impugned order. There is no merit in this application. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)