C.R. No.1793 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.1793 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.10.2010 Harbhajan Ram ……Petitioner VERSUS Tarsem Lal ……Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- Present: Mr. Balbir Singh Sewak, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the respondent. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the respondent is taken on record. 2. Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 26.11.2007 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Garhshankar as well as order dated 23.01.2010 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Hoshiarpur, whereby allowing the applica- C.R. No.1793 of 2010 (O&M) -2- tion seeking ad-interim mandatory injunction moved by the defen- dant-respondent and dismissing the ad-interim injunction application moved by the plaintiff-petitioner herein. 3. Learned Counsel appearing for the parties fairly stated that present petition be disposed of with their consent in the following terms:- i) Parties shall maintain status-quo qua the possession and nature of the property till the disposal of the suit. ii) The learned trial Court shall decide the suit itself preferably within six months from the date certified copy of this order is placed be- fore the learned trial Court. iii) None of the parties shall seek any unnec- essary adjournment. iv) Any observation made in the impugned or- der shall not prejudice mind of the learned trial Court while deciding the suit at its own merit in accordance with law. 4. Present petition stands disposed of with the consent of learned Counsel for the parties in the above terms. ( ALOK SINGH ) C.R. No.1793 of 2010 (O&M) -3- 28h October, 2010 JUDGE ashish