1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1422 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1422 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1422 OF 2005 R.Julian Rayappan ...Petitioner R.Julian Rayappan ...Petitioner R.Julian Rayappan ...Petitioner Vs. Vs. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ----- ----- ----- Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the State. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the State. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATED: 1ST MARCH, 2006 DATED: 1ST MARCH, 2006 DATED: 1ST MARCH, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Mr. Konde-Deshmukh, the learned A.P.P. 1. Heard Mr. Konde-Deshmukh, the learned A.P.P. 1. Heard Mr. Konde-Deshmukh, the learned A.P.P. The Registrar, High Court, Mumbai had received a The Registrar, High Court, Mumbai had received a The Registrar, High Court, Mumbai had received a letter from the Petitioner and the same has been letter from the Petitioner and the same has been letter from the Petitioner and the same has been converted into a writ petition. The Petitioner prays converted into a writ petition. The Petitioner prays converted into a writ petition. The Petitioner prays for being released instantly as he has completed 17 for being released instantly as he has completed 17 for being released instantly as he has completed 17 years of actual imprisonment excluding all allusions. years of actual imprisonment excluding all allusions. years of actual imprisonment excluding all allusions. 2. Mr. Konde-Deshmukh, the learned A.P.P. has 2. Mr. Konde-Deshmukh, the learned A.P.P. has 2. Mr. Konde-Deshmukh, the learned A.P.P. has pointed out that the very same prayer of the petition pointed out that the very same prayer of the petition pointed out that the very same prayer of the petition i.e. R. Julian Rayappan came to be considered by i.e. R. Julian Rayappan came to be considered by i.e. R. Julian Rayappan came to be considered by this Court in Criminal Writ Petition No.313 of 2005, this Court in Criminal Writ Petition No.313 of 2005, this Court in Criminal Writ Petition No.313 of 2005, and the Petition was rejected. The petitioner was and the Petition was rejected. The petitioner was and the Petition was rejected. The petitioner was further granted liberty to submit a representation. further granted liberty to submit a representation. further granted liberty to submit a representation. 3. Under the circumstances this Petition need not 3. Under the circumstances this Petition need not 3. Under the circumstances this Petition need not be entertained and the same is hereby rejected be entertained and the same is hereby rejected be entertained and the same is hereby rejected summarily. summarily. summarily. 2 (ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.) (ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.) (ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)