gA 1SE/ Q HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Smqle Bench .: Hon’ble Shn Dliip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. i Second Appea! (PR) No 2716 of 2006 Anbeilant ,Shn Bhagwan Blhan Lal Chhota Plaintiff ‘ Math Mandlr Mathpara Durg, i aged about 60 years through Sanchahka Jamuna Ba! Beva - Kashlram Dewangan R/o Koshtapara, Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.) ‘ S l 1 } \ { ‘ ‘ ’ versus I , ' Respaltdents r 1. Dr Sudama Prasad Gupta S/o Defendant Notknown i V . 2. Ranwr Smgh Chane S/o Now known { Both Rio MaWiya Nagar, Durg, Distt.Durg Se’cond Appea! under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure ‘ \ ‘ ‘ \ ‘ ‘ v Pres‘ent: No one appears for the appellant. ‘ ORAL ORDER l ‘ r (Passed on this 09‘“ day of July, 2608) in this second appeal the Registry had pointed out as many as 5 defaults. On 10-03-2008, two weeks’ time was finally granted to the. appellant‘s counsel for removing the defaults. On 21-04—2008» counsel for the appellant Shn B KChakravarty Informed this court that the defamts have been removed The Registry was asked to verlfy and l ‘ procped further. The Addltronal Registrar (Judicral).has reported that ' defajults No.1, 3 and 4 have not yet been removed. Today, even the counsel for the appellant Is absent J (2) l The appeal is dismissed in default of the appellant. ix \