IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 8209/2010 a/w CWP Nos. 8210, 8211 and 8222 of 2010 Decided on: 29.12.2010 1. CWP No. 8209 of 2010 Radha Sharma Versus State of H.P. and ors. 2. CWP No. 8210 of 2010 Barfi Devi Versus State of H.P. and ors. 3. CWP No. 8211 of 2010 Duni Chand Versus State of H.P. and ors. 4. CWP No. 8222 of 2010 Purshottam Ram Versus State of H.P. and ors. Coram : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge For the petitioners: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, vice Mr. R.S. Gautam, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G with Mr. Ankus Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:- “ i) That a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ or order may kindly be issued directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner as Junior Basic Teacher (JBT) w.e.f. 01.01.208 instead of 26.02.2009 and further the petitioner be held entitled for the consequential financial benefits and seniority etc.” 2. We are informed by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the issue is squarely covered in favour of the 2 petitioners by the decision of this Court in CWP (T) No. 8194 of 2008, titled Bhagat Ram and others Versus State of H.P. and others, decided on 16.11.2010. There will be a direction to the second respondent to examine the matter in light of the judgment, referred to above, and take appropriate action in accordance with law. This shall be done within a period of four months from the date of production of copy of this judgment and a copy of the judgment, referred to above, along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner concerned. 3. With these observations, the writ petitions stand disposed of, so also the pending application(s) if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Sharma), December 29, 2010 Judge (VT/pankaj)