IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. FAO No.3309 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision:-10.9.2009 Ram Dass ...Appellant Versus Karam Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.V.S.Punia, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Ashok Jindal, Additional AG Haryana for respondent Nos.2 and 3. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): CM No.16072-CII of 2007 The present appeal which is barred by time has been filed by the appellant challenging the award of the Tribunal for enhancement of compensation. Alongwith the appeal, the applicant has filed an application for condonation of delay of 469 days in filing the appeal. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. A perusal of the grounds of appeal would show that the ground being raised by the applicant is not legally tenable. In fact the applicant has failed to explain the sufficient cause for delay in filing the appeal. I find no merit in this application. Thus, the application for condonation of delay is rejected. FAO No.3309 of 2007 Since the application for condonation of delay has been rejected, the appeal is dismissed being time barred. 10.9.2009 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) AS Judge