WW(W ) W W m.Ls 284 m mg {Writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of india} Single Bench: Hon’b ‘e Mr. Justice L.C. Bhadoo 14-1 -2008 Mr. Sumit Verma, Panel L er for the Statefrespondents No.1 & 3, on advance copy. Heard. The petitioner has questioned legality and correctness of the order dated 13—11-2007 passed by Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Paiycounsel for the petitioner. the Director, Panchayat, State of Qhhattisgarh, in Appeal No.220/B- l21/2006-07 whereby learned Director, » Panchayat has rejected the appeal iof the petitioner herein. 7», f . amm me’i‘eam mwefeetm teamwén FEnuoNtR: smt. Shail Bai, W/o Shankar Verman. aged about 34 years. Rio Village: Gorakhpur, Tahsil: Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) ‘ > -Versus- ‘f RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Collector, Durg. 2. The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Jangalpur, Tahsil: Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Avam Ba! Vikas Priyojna. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Smt. Satyawati Rather, Wio Shiv ’Bhadra Singh Rather, R/o Village: Gorakhpur, Tahsilz, Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) ‘ aw W w ganwadi Karyakarta were invited for appointment in Village: Gorakhp , Tahsit: Bemetata, Distt. Durg by the Project Officer of the integrated hild Devetopment Project, Bemetara in which initiaily a panel of five appli ants were prepared, however, the date was, extended, thereafter, the na e of respondent No.4 herein was aiso included and respondent No.4 w s found most eligible amongst alt the applicants. Therefore, a resolutio of the Gram Panchayat was passed to appoint respondent No.4 herein and accordingly, she was appointed. Appointment of respondent No.4 ereln was challenged by the petitioner herein before the Additional Colle tor, the appellate authority, where the appeal was allowed against whic respondent No.4 preferred an appeal before the Director, Panchayat, w o allowed the appeal and restored the original order/resolution of the am Panchayat passed in favour of V respondent No.4 herein. Perusal of the order impu ned shows that during the selection process the petitioner herein was ot found eligible being only 7‘“ class pass, as she was not middle class ass and that the minimum qualification prescribed for appointment of nganwadi Karyakarta. Since the petitioner was not qualified, she ha, rightly been found unfit, as such, l do not find any ground to interfere wit the order of the Director, Panchayat, as the same does not suffer from a y jurisdictional error or infirmity Therefore the wnt petition is liable to be dismissed and it is hereby dismissedmlimine No orderasto osts Sd/_ L.C.BHADOO Judge Brief facts leading to tiling 3f this writ petition are that applications for appointment on the post of Soma u ‘ n r a