IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36297 of 2010 ABHIMANU KUMAR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . with Cr.Misc. No.36447 of 2010 1. VEENA DEVI 2. DIWAKAR PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 19.01.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application as petitioner no.2 of Cr. Misc. No.36447 of 2010 has been arrested by the police. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn. Heard learned counsel for the rest petitioners and the State. Learned counsel for the informant Sri Sandip Singh is also present. Torture for demand of dowry is the allegation followed by ouster of the informant from matrimonial home is further added by the learned counsel for informant about marrying husband another lady finds no place in the First Information Report or rejection order. Alleged incident of ouster is submitted to doubt the whole allegation that an attempt was made, all the accused persons after coming informant’s parental house attempted to take back the informant to matrimonial home, but to kill, if was exposed then why informant was not killed before her ouster from matrimonial 2 home. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, above named petitioners namely Abhimanu Kumar and Veena Devi shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Beldour P.S. Case No.71/2010, G.R. No.1255/2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)