M‘ ‘ Ben" N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASP Writ Patition g; g2? c: g /2oos /Prakash Naidu, Son of Shri Bal Ram Naidu, Assistant Grade-III, Age 52 years, Posted at Office of the Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Project Division, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). Petitioner Qa Versus / ggew a ;/. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Public Health Engineering, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2/ Superintendent Engineer, Public Health Engineering, Raipur Board, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). ‘ a Resgondents /V K” RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA W XI—HC-22 12.08 2005 Shn Ramakant Mmhm, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Panka] Shnvastava, Panel, Lawyer for the State on advance copy W.P. No. 3708 of 2005. Heard. Learned .counéel for petitioner was appointed on pen'u'dner submits that t/he post of Assistant Grade-Illin Hist services were connrmed On P H E deparhnent on 30 6 19 e . the sald post on 6 2 1993 He ubmtts that the gradation 11st of semonty which has been nxed on the baSIs of calcmations from the date of connrmation i.e.6.2. 993. He further submits that in such a case, according to the rules, seniority of the petitioner should have 'been nxed "aft the department was published in case of the petitioner was n calculatingi his services w.e.f. 30 6 ’1979 ie nom the initial da of his appointment and not horn 6 2 1993 1 e horn the date of c For the time bemg, learne counsel for the petitioner makes th1s hunted prayer that the pe 'tioner may be duected to hle a detailed representation before tion. competent authority and the competent authority should directed - to dispose of his representation within the stipul period granted by this Court. This limited rayer m e by learned counsel for. the 7 e x e o e e a p am,mnm,%at ..uunnnnu i zoo “nun...unuouu.n nuuuunnnunn.u amaaa ' Ai ' W§WW - aa%wam%:1 If so advi h ph'h'o may 6 a etld repmsentau'on it a c of th order aso a copy of this writ petition fom th comtent v'author within eriod of 15 days mam today and' if uc a rept , e competent authority c hall dispose he s el s possible mfEIablywxthm a peiod of eks dim t ae f ingmceipt of the said presntation b psng a reoned order n he grounds raised by th petieonr and indicat y h rt n the earlier part of this ordr. ith the resaid srtions, this petiton stands dnally ssed of. sa/i" Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge (@W) 3§rmg Wm Wm.u” n .uuu un m - WW % sed, te en ‘ $ daie along wh opy is d l be e pe i a p sh resentai n is‘ med th s of t same a ary a p r 6 we a he dt o fil/ ree y asi as o t e e ed b tis cou i e W afo obeva i dipo i