IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 11830 of 2010 Kuleesh Anand and others ...Petitioners Versus Union of India and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Anjali Kukkar, Advocate for Union of India. RANJIT SINGH J. The petitioners claim the training allowance on the basis of some instructions. The Government has responded and has relied on the memorandum that such allowance is granted when person joins against the sanctioned strength. There is a dispute whether such training allowance is admissible to those employees who are posted against the sanctioned post or who are permanently posted there. It may require a proof on the basis of evidence. It would, therefore, be appropriate for the petitioner to approach the civil Court where this issue can be properly adjudicated. The petitioners are relegated to remedy of filing the civil suit. The writ petition is dismissed. July 19, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH) rts JUDGE