1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 8776 OF 2011 (M/s S.P. Bothra and sons through its Partner VS The State of Maharashtra and ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. D.S. Bagul, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. V.D. Rakh, A.G.P. for the respondent-State ... CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 21.11.2011 P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner restricts his claim in the Petition insofar as prayer clause (E) is concerned. 3. We dispose of the Writ Petition by directing respondent no.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case within a period of four (4) weeks from today. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M. T. JOSHI, J. ] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]