THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A.No.2413 of 2000 JUDGMENT: The respondent filed T.A.No.383 of 1990 before the Secunderabad Bench of Railway Claims Tribunal for damages on account of shortage of A.V.Fuel that was entrusted for transport to the appellant. It was alleged that a wagon of A.V.Fuel, which was being transported from Wadala to Sanathnagar, caught fire at Ippaguda Railway Station and the entire Fuel was burnt away. A sum of Rs.2,99,647/- being cost of the Fuel was claimed. The Tribunal allowed the T.A. through order, dated 07.09.1998. Hence, this appeal. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. Though the respondent is served with notice, it has not chosen to enter appearance. There was a serious difference of opinion among the Members of the Tribunal. It was ultimately resolved by referring it to a Third Member. It is a matter of record that the appellant as well as the respondent are Central Government Organisations. There is a settled procedure for resolution of disputes between such agencies. Hence, the appeal is allowed and the order under appeal is set aside. It is left open to the parties to have recourse to the procedure adopted by the Central Government for resolution of the disputes among the organisations functioning under it. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:09.10.2009 kdl