1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1054 OF 2006 Haseeb Zubair Mulla and others Petitioners versus State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.M.H.Solkar for petitioner. Mr.P.S.Hingorani, APP for State. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR AND P.D.KODE, JJ. DATE : 24th August 2011 PC : 1. This petition is placed on board under caption `dismissal' in terms of order dated 18th August 2011. Today Mr.Solkar appearing for the petitioners states that he has already taken instructions from the petitioners and he intents to argue the matter himself. Accordingly, we have heard Mr.Solkar. 2. The grievance in this petition is essentially in respect of draft charges articulated by the Investigating Officer. The petitioners have approached this Court by way of present petition apprehending that the Trial Court would accept the draft charges as it is without considering the objection of the petitioners, which may be available to them on the basis of the material produced along with the charge sheet. It is common ground that till date no charges have been framed. 2 3. The apprehension, in our opinion, is misplaced. It is well established position that before the charges are framed, the Court is obliged to consider all aspects of the matter including the objections of the accused persons named in the charge sheet. In the circumstances, we dispose of this petition with liberty to the petitioners to agitate all questions that are raised in the present petition or any other contentions as may be available to them, praying before the Trial Court not to frame any charges against them as proposed by the Investigating Officer or otherwise. All questions in that behalf are kept open. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (P.D.KODE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)