7 Writ Petition 1. Smt. Damyanti Chauhan w/o Sundsr Lal Chauhan, aged 43 years, R.'o Q.N. 66, Valmiki Ambedkar Colony, P. Ravishankar Suki Nagar, Korba, Dis8. Korba C.G. 2. Smt. Suman Bareth, VV/o Rameshwar Bareth, agsd 19 years, R/o Q. N. 84, Vaimiki Ambedkar Coiony, P. Ravishankar Suki Nagar, Korba, DistS. Korba C.G. 3. Smi. Kara Bai W/o Laxman Das Mahant, aged 40 years, R/o Q.N. 95, Valmiki Ambedkar Cclony, P. Ravishankar Suki Nagar, Korba, Distt.KorbaC.G. 4. Smt. Geeta Bareth W/o Jagdish sareth, aged about 45 years, R/o Q.N. 65, Va!miki Ambedkar Colony, P.Ravishankar Suki Nagar, Korba, Distt. Korba C.G. 5. Smt. Samund Bhardwaj W/o Gurudeo Bhardwaj, aged 24 years, R'o Q.N. 86, Vslmiki Ambedkar Coiony, P. Ravishankar Suki Nagar, Korba, Disft. Korba C.G. 6. Smt. Geeta Shrivastava W/o Abhisek Sinha, aged 54 years, R/o Q.N. 80, Va!miki Ambedkar Coiony, P.Ravishankar Suki Nagar, Korba, Distt.KorbaC.G. 7. Smt. Ram Bai W/o Dhani Ram, aged about 45 years, R/o Q.N. 54, Valmik' Ambedkar Colony, P.Ravishankar Sukl Nagar, Korba, Distt.KorbaC.G. 8. Srnt. Anita Singh W/o Abhay Raj, aged 35 years, R.'o Q.N. 35, Valmiki Ambedkar Coiony, P.Ravishankar Suki Nagar, Korba, Distt. Korba 9. Smt. Ganga Bai Vv7o Heera Gir, aged about 42 years, R/o Q.N. 38, Valmiki Ambedkar Co!ony, P. Ravishankar Suk! Nagar, Korba, Distt-KorbaC.G. 10. Smt. Kero Bai VV/o Juthaii Sahu, aged about 58 years, R/o Q.N. 48, yatmiki Ambedkar Coiony, P.Ravishankar Suki Nagar, Korba, Dlstt.KorbaC.G. 11. Smt. Shyam Bai W/o Narayan Sahu, aged 35 years, R/o Q.N. 36, VaSmikE Ambedkar Co!ony, P.Ravishankar Suki Nagar, Korba, Distt. Korba C.G. Smt. Hirmaniya Kumhar VV/o Amar Singh Kumhar, aged ^n i^* i about 35 13. years, R/o Q.N.75, Vaimiki Ambedkar Coiony, P.Ravishankar Suki Nagar, Korba, Distt. Korba C.G. Smt. Boond Kunwer Chauhan W/o Late Murari Chauhan, Aged about 48 years, R/o Q.N.31, Valmiki Ambedkar Colony, P.Ravishankar Suk! Nagar, Korba, Distt. C.G. Versus Municipai Corporation, Korba, Through, The Commissioner, Korba, Distt. Korba C.G. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary Department of Loca! Govemment, D.K.S. Bhawan, RalpurC.G. WSiT-PETmON_UNDERARTiCLE2260FTHECQNSTrLUTlQNQF (SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Shri M.K. Beg; Advocats for the petitioners. Shri Sanjay K. Agrawai, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Advocate for the respondent No. 2. O RD E R (Passed on thls 31si day of August, 2Q07) The peutioners admittedly have occupied the accommodations wiihout any authorization, forcibly. The State Government under the Vaimiki-Ambedkar Awas Yojna decided to grani alternative accommodations to the residents of Vaimikl-Ambedkar Coiony on a payment of nominal amount. Accordingly, the petitioners were granted alternative accommodations, as described in the document Annexure R/2-2. It has been stated that some of the persons have already taken possession in the atternative slte. The petitioners, despite having been granted alterative accommodations, are continuing in occupatlon unauthorizediy at the houses in Vaimiki-Ambedkar co!ony. The petitioners have not ^ --L-- Dointed out any document or any order in support of their right over the houses in which they are residing in Vaimiki-Ambedkar colony. Learned counsei appeanng for the petitioners submlts that the petitioners accommodations in Valmiki-Ambedkar colony is unathorized, but they were given to understand that they wouid be granted accommodations there, where they are residing. There is nothing, except the self-same statement. EVioreover the petitioners have aiready been granted altemauve accommodations, as described in the document Annexure R/2-2. Thus, the petitioners have no right to continue unathorizedly in the houses vi/here they are In viev/ of the foregoing, this astocosts. siding at present. writ petitlon is dismissed. No order il- Sd/- S.K. Agnihotri Judge