IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42398 of 2009 TARUN YADAV SON OF GOVIND YADAV, R/O VILLAGE- BAIJNATHPUR, P.S.- KARANDEY, DISTRICT- SHEIKHPURA Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SAVITA DEVI D/O GAJNOO YADAV, R/O VILL- MOHANPUR, P.S.- CHANDRADEEP, DISTRICT- JAMUI ----------- 4 10/02/2010 Heard Mr. Anajani Prasad Singh learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under Sections 307 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The informant was married 5 years earlier with the petitioner but there is allegation that she was being tortured by her in-laws because of her inability to provide television and motorcycle by way of additional dowry. One night the accused persons tried to set her on fire but she escaped. Submission is that no demand was made. The petitioner is in custody since 6.7.2009. Father-in-law and mother-in-law of the petitioner has been admitted to anticipatory bail. Prayer for bail has been opposed by the learned APP assisted by the learned counsel for the informant. It is submitted that the petitioner may be 2 directed to keep the informant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M./concerned Court, Sheikhpura in connection with Karandey P.S. Case No. 07 of 2009. However, the informant is at liberty to move before the Family Court for redressal of her grievance. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)