IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM MONDAY, THE 29TH AUGUST 2011 / 7TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 17559 of 2010(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): DEFACTO COMPLAINANT ---------------------------------- J.JACOB KALLUMMOODAN, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.P.JOSEPH KALLUMMOODAN, JOY VILLA, SAKTI KULANGARA.P.O, KOLLAM (RESIDING WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF SAKTIKULANGARA POLICE STATION). BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV RESPONDENT(S): ACCUSED ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, (HEAD OF POLICE DEPARTMENT), LAW & ORDER, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENTOF POLICE, KOLLAM. 4. DY.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KARUNAGAPPALLY, (CRIME NO.314/2010 OF SAKTIKULANGARA POLICE STATION). 5. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SAKTIKULANGARA POLICE STATION. 6. ALBIN BOSS, S/O.BOSS BERNARD, KUTTUMVATHUKKAL, SAKTIKULANGARA, KOLLAM. 7. VINOD CHERIAN, S/O.AANJALI CHERIAN, CHURCH ROAD, SAKTIKULANGARA.P.O, KOLLAM. 8. MARLO, S/O.BALDWIN, IDAPPADAM VIAL, KAVANAD.P.O, KOLLAM. 9. TONY, S/O.GILBERT, MALITHOPPIL, SAKTIKULANGARA.P.O, KOLLAM. 10. ROY, S/O.CHARLEY JOSEPH, THOTTATHIL, SAKTIKULANGARA.P.O, KOLLAM. 11. JOY THOMAS, S/O.MANUEL THOMAS, JERRY LAND, KOOTTUMVATHICKAL, SAKTIKULANGARA.P.O, KOLLAM. 12. JOSE THOMAS, S/O.MANUEL THOMAS, JERRY LAND, KOOTTUMVATHICKAL, SAKTIKULANGARA.P.O, KOLLAM. 13. JOHN WILFRED, S/O.ANJALI WILFRED, KURUMALATHOPPU, SAKTIKULANGARA, KOLLAM. ADV. SRI. K.SHAJ FOR R11& 13 SRI.SAJJU.S FOR R11 & 13 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPIN DAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 17559 OF 2010 ------------------------ Dated this the 29th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. In this writ petition seeking police protection, this court on 26/7/2010 issued an interim order directing the police officers (respondents 2 to 5) to provide protection to the life of the petitioner from respondents 6 to 13. Today the learned counsel appearing for respondents 6 to 13 submitted before us that those respondents have no intention at all to cause any danger or injury to the life of the petitioner. Under the above circumstances, we are of the view that the interim order dated 26/7/2010 can be confirmed and the writ petition itself can be disposed of accordingly. We confirm the interim order dated 26/7/2010 and dispose of this writ petition. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE. dpk WPC.No. 2