THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.12514 OF 2006 ORAL ORDER: The petitioner, who was awarded the contract by the respondents for maintaining Cycle/Scooter Stand at the Railway Station, Ongole, Prakasam district, filed this writ petition seeking a declaration that the alleged inaction on the part of the respondents in considering his representations dated 30.3.2006 and 10.5.2006 for extension of the contract, is arbitrary and illegal. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri T.S. Venkata Ramana, the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent-Railways. Without expressing any opinion as to the entitlement of the petitioner for extension of the contract, as prayed for, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representations dated 30.3.2006 and 10.5.2006, and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ______________ (G. ROHINI, J.) 22nd June, 2006. Kgr THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.12514 OF 2006 22nd June, 2006. Between: Talluri Dillip. .. Petitioner. And The Union of India, owning South Central Railway, represented by its General Manager, Rail Nilayam, Secunderabad and another. .. Respondents.