((-1-)) HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1256 OF 2004 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 320 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax City Mumbai. .... Appellant Versus M/s. Siti Cable Network Ltd. Mumbai. .... Respondent Mr. A. Kotangale i/by Pankaj Kapoor for hte Appellant. None for Respondents. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: AUGUST 27, 2007 DATED: AUGUST 27, 2007 DATED: AUGUST 27, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Considering the affidavit in support of the motion and as the delay is less than 200 days and considering the pendency in the Law Ministry, the cause shown would amount to sufficient cause. Hence, delay condoned. Motion made absolute in terms of Prayer Clause (a). Office to register the appeal. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)