IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 6588 of 2011 alongwith CWP No. 6589 of 2011 . Date of decision: 12.8.2011 1. CWP No. 6588 of 2011 Roshan Lal & others .. Petitioners. Vs. State of H.P. and anr. .Respondents. 2. CWP No. 6589 of 2011 Vijya Kumari & anr. .. Petitioners. Vs. State of H.P. and anr. .. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the Petitioners : Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petitions are filed with the following prayers: CWP No. 6588 of 2011. “(a) That the respondents may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the petitioners from the date when their juniors have been considered for regularization or at least from the date when they have completed their 10 years of service. (b) That the respondents may also be directed to produce the entire service record of the petitioners as also their juniors who inspite of being juniors to the petitioners have been regularized earlier in point of time.” CWP No. 6589 of 2011. “a) That the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the cases of the petitioners for regularization from the date when their juniors were regularized. b) That respondents may kindly be directed to consider the case of the petitioners for regularization at least from the date when they have completed their 10 years of service or in accordance to the regularization policy of the Part Time workers. 2. There will be a direction to the second respondent to look into the cases of the petitioners and take appropriate action in accordance with the policy regarding the regularization. In case, any junior has been regularized prior to the petitioners and in case it is done out of mistake, proper action shall be taken to rectify that mistake with notice to that person. The cases of the petitioners for regularization shall be considered in accordance with the policy and the action as required under law shall be taken within four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition(s) by the petitioners concerned before the second respondent. 3. With these observations, the writ petitions stand disposed of, so also pending applications, if any (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Ahuja), August 12, 2011. Judge (hl)