WP(C) 5232/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE T VAIPHEI Heard Mr D Saikia, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms P Chakraborty, the learned standing counsel, Social Welfare Department. Also heard Mr MU Maham ud, the learned counsel for the private respondents. The writ petition is for issuing a direction to the State respondents fo r quashing the appointments of the private respondents as Anganwadi Workers in t he Anganwadi Centres namely, 197-Dakua-Kamarkuchuck AWC, 163-Banmukh Mishing AWC , 138-Arapathar Ganak Dolony- Ka AWC, 67-Sessa Rajgarh AWC, 145-Nidandhowa-Goda suck AWC, 116-Gohaipukhuri Mishing AWC and to appoint the petitioners in place o f these private respondents. It is agreed to by both the counsel that similar order passed in WP(C) No.1328/2010 can be passed in this case also for disposal. Pursuant to the advertisement, the petitioners numbering 6(six) of them appeared in the interview for the posts of Anganwadi Workers at the loca lity mentioned above. A specific case made by the petitioners, is that, the priv ate respondents did not belong to the locality of these aforesaid centres and th eir appointments made in contravention of the guidelines issued by the responden t authorities cannot, therefore, be sustained in law. In fact, it is the contention of the learned counsel for the private respondents is that they are eligible for appointment to the post of Anganwadi Workers sinc e they belong to the locality of the centres. As there are allegations and count er allegations on the residence of the rival parties, this Court has no machiner y to investigate this factual dispute. Under the circumstances, the Director of Social Welfare Department (respondent N o.2) is directed to examine the controversies raised by both the parties and the reafter pass appropriate orders on the basis of the findings arrived at by him. The decision taken by the respondent No.2 shall be communicated to the petition ers without any delay. It shall be open to the petitioners to approach this Court again if they are agg rieved by the decision taken by the respondent No.2. The entire exercise shall b e carried out by the respondent No.2 within two months from the date of receipt of this order.