IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISSAKH K BILASPUR MISC. APPEALNO.^fD OF 2008 ?-^ MISCEI.IANEOUS APPEAI, UNDER ORDER 43 RUI.E 1 (£) , CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDUKE, 1908 Appellaht Pratap Rai Ahuja -<-"' Plaintiff Choudhary S/o Shri Laxmandas, R/o Kashyap Colony, Bilaspur Tehsil S Distt. Bilaspur (C.G) Resppndent^ Defendants lA.-^e^^"' ^^S^€^.2 y^' 7..*^ .a.'s3-^-^ y,y ' „,».&«;1 .^. Bf^- >•-"• » ..& ^y^ < Versus Jai Bhagwan Agrawal, aged 53 years, S/p Late Bhunduram Agrawal, R/o Vidyanagar Ward No. 14, House , No. 309, Tehsil & Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Suresh Kumar Kachchwaha, aged about 35 years, S/o Late Dauram Kachchwaha, R/o Juna Bilaspur, Pachrignat, Tehsil and Distt. Bilaspur (CG) t t 4. > t 5. > Rajkumar Kachchwaha, aged 45 years, S/o Dauram Kachchwaha, R/o Juna Bilaspur, Pachrighat, Tehsil & Distt. Bilaspur (CG) Pawan Kumar Kachchwaha, aged 38 years, S/'o Dauram Kachchwaha, R/o Bus Stand, Imlipara, Tehsil S Distt. Bilaspur (CG) Smt. Jamuna Bai Kachchwaha, aged 65 yeas, Wd/o Dauram Kachchwaha, R/o Juna Bilaspur, Pachrighat, Tehsil & Distt. Bilaspur (CG) 6. Smt. Ranno Bai, aged 37 years, Wd/o Late Krishna Kumar Kchchwaha. -^ 7. Vikki KachchwaMa, S/o Late Krishna Kumar, aged 13 years, minor, through Natural. Guardian Mother Ranno Bai, Wd/o Late Krishna Kumar Kachchwaha. Komal Kachchwaha, S/o Krishna Kumar Kachchwaha, through Natural Guardian Mother Ranno Bai, Wd/o Late Krishna Kumar Kachchwaha. (Sl.No. 6 to 8 R/o of Sabji Mandi, Katni, Tehsil & Distt. Katni (M.P.) TST "41'41d-4, ®T|1<-1<1®,T°«ni'Hy,< »_.mA........S>.o.............. -3 S.B. Hon'ble SamJusticeN.K. Agarwal 30.06.2009 Shri Sanjay Shyam Agraw^l Shri H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate for the respondent No. | w^il, Advocate for the appellant. j^dvocate with Smt. Meera Jaiswal, 11. Feeling aggrieved by the qipfejN wrcff •?•fe'^ • brder dated 14.1 t, passed by the District Judge, Bilaspur, in ^ivil suit No. 12A/08, whereby the application filed by the appella4t under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 has been dismissed; the appeUaat has| filed this appeal. The main grievance of 1|he appellant is that although the findings regarding out of lfare|e settled principles for grant of temporary injunction, the findin^ regarding prima-faeie case and the balance of convenience has been| recorded in favour ofthe plainti^ but by holding that petitioner injuiy, the application filed by tl^e appellant under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 has been dismissed which is s not going to suffer irreparable aadinlaw. The appellant's maia pr4yer is that as plaintifiFs suit for specific perfonnance of contract]is pending and Ifae respondeat No. '^t..-f ^ s-. ^<:^3^. ^. i 6w®BBSa S ^vay' ^ 1 v ./ ^"P.SSS'E^' Sahu TST •^I^ICl'4, ®Tll<-l-i|S,i°«yll'H'i< __...MA^....^:^............. sn^? TR^ ('i^Iai^) 9 1, beingthe subsequent purchasct to alienate the same or from crel property till disposal ofthe suit. Smt. Meera Jaiswal, le^med counsel appeariag for the respondent No. 1 alongwrth S submits that ifthe suit is disposep ofwithin a period ofsix months, she undertakes on behalf of resit> counsel for respondent No. 1, no Accordingly, this petition i trial court to decide fhe suit as e, period of six months, after affon the parties. ofthe suit property, be restrained iting third party interest in the suit . Advocate Shri H.B. Agrawal, ondeat No. 1 Ifaat the respondent No. 1 shall not alienate the suit prjoperty till disposal ofthe suit. Therefore, based on undjertaking given by Smt. Jaiswal, [iirther order is required. disposed ofwith a direction to the jrlyas possible, preferably withia a |ling due opportunity ofhearing to Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge