:1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2849 OF 2005 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders. of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S.P. Kanugafor the Petitioner. Ms. U.V. Kejriwal for the State. CORAM :R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED :DECEMBER 22, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The learned advocate for the petitioner craves leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an appeal with further liberty to raise all the points including the points which are not considered by the lower authority. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to file an appeal and if such appeal is filed the appellate authority should consider all the points including the points which are not considered by the lower authority. Petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as withdrawn. :2: 2. As regards the expeditious hearing by the appellate authority, we do not find it necessary to give directions in that regard because there is no reason to conclude that the appellate authority will not hear the matter expeditiously. (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.) (R. S. MOHITE, J.)