'ITIQNER,^: /^.^ i^//ilf IN THEHIGH<~'OURTOEC'HHATTISGARE[AT BILASPtJR WRIT PETIJiION No. ..2-GS 1/2001 T Lalman Prasad Sao, S/o Bhtiwneshwar Prasad Sa6, ^aged about 17% years, IhrgBglrEafher : BKuwanesliwar Prasad SSQ S/6 Late Slu-i Bliagwat Prasad Sao •aged abottf 49 years , ; ' ^o Village & Posit Tillceja ; ' .'^ia—BHaisma . ;;; 'Satel ^ ©istf.Korba (C.G.) WERSUS--': . : !; .". 1:1:.:' 1. :,!Board;of Secondary ]Bdue,ltio&i, . Blio^al (Ma.dhya Practesti^ ^, :1 i ;2.' .^Priiicipal' <,:; ',! '^ . :: ':'.^:, •' '.^ ;r<3ovf. Higher Seeondary School, Village - Tilfceja . • Via - Bliaistfla Taii. &JMstt. KorBa (C.G.) u .^^^..1'1^ :''':'' .^'^': . '^:! :': ^' .•:v..fr •.: .^-^' 1'1. :.' 'i:i: '^%^23l:::J::^:^..K^-^l iwaiKi'SBtt^^:';MMatt^^ cMgiiaMME ,l-::-..;6;»y....c..-.u<.».i.•..,.; HIGH COURT OF CI-IHATTISGARH AT BlLASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 2651 OF 2001 Versus RfisBfinClenti l.-alrnan Prasad Sao Board of Secondary Edueation, Bhopal & another. ~^i WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IMDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri V.G.Tamaskar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyerforthe State/respondentNo.2 ORQER(ORAL) (Passed onTo2ncldayofAugust, 2010) 1. The petitioner seeks, by this petition re-checking i.e. re- assessment of the answer sheets for the examination of Hlgher Secondary School Certificate Examination held in March-Aprl!, 2001, as the petitioner does not seem to be satisfied by the re- checking of answer books of Higher Secondary School Certiflcate Examination, vi/hich was conducted pursuant to the order dated 24/7/2001 passedinW.P.No. 1102/2001. 2. The sole ground raised by the petitioner that. in the identical situation, the Board was directed to revaluate answer papers of the candidates and there is also provisions enshrined in Regulation No. 119 of the Board of Secondary Education (Madhya Pradesh) Regulations, 1965). Regulation '119 reads as under: "Fteg.119 : A candidate who has appeared at an examination of the Board may apply to the Secretary for the scrutiny of his marks and the marks and re-checking of his result in accordance with the rules framed by the Board". '-a>~ :tS^- "•-• ^ .••tf- 3. On hearing learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perusal of the provlsions of Regulation 119, it is clear that only scrutiny of marks and re-checking of marks awarded in the answer sheets are permitted. 4. The Board of Secondary Education in compliance with the order dated 24/7/2001 passed by this Court,-has already directed re- checking ot' the answer sheets of High Secohdary School Certificate Examination and 6f re-checking no change was noticed in the marks obtained by the petitloner as is evident from Annexure P-10 and letter dated 5/11/2001 (Annexure P-11) addressed to the petitiQner, there is no merit in the case. 5. For the reasons mentloned hereinabove, the instant petition is repetition of the earlier writ petition being W.P.No.1102/2001, wl-iich has already been disposed of and pursuant to direction, re chfecking /re-assessment of answer sheets have already been done. Thus, this petition is bereft of merit and is accordingly dismissed. 6. No order asto costs. 3 l/ Sd/- Satfsh K. Agnihotri Judge ashok