IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3213 of 2007 RAM NIWAS SINGH SON OF LATE RAGHO SHARAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BABURA, P.O. BABURA, P.S. BARHARA, DISTRCIT- BHOJPUR Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME (POLICE), OLD SECRETARIAT, BIHAR, PATNA 3.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, OLD SECRETARIAT, BIHAR, PATNA 4.DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMINISTRATION) OLD SECRETARIAT, BIHAR, PATNA 5.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (D), CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT, OLD SECRETARIAT, BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 2 21.04.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The only grievance of the petitioner is the department has not calculated the number of unutilized leave so as to make the correct payment on account of leave encashment. In this connection learned counsel submits that representation was file b the petitioner on 15.12.2006. Learned counsel, however, submits that for redressal of the left out grievances, as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.5. In this view of the matter, it is directed that in case such representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order, the respondent no.5 shall consider and dispose of the same by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of the representation. Upon such consideration, if the representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, the above respondent shall simultaneously issue necessary orders so that the grievances of the petitioner, as raised in the representation, could be redressed without delay in the light of the order passed by him on such representation. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.) Manish/-