1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1653/2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1652/2010. Sukhraj Kolge Vs. Govindlal Hedda and Anr.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATE : 3 rd August, 2010. ... 1) Heard Mr.MP Tripathi, Adv. h/for Mr. PR Kadam, Adv. for applicant; Mr.MB Kolpe, Adv. for Respondent No.1 and Mr.BJ Sonawane, APP for Respondent No.2/State. 2) This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 74 days caused in filing the accompanying criminal application seeking leave to file appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 9.12.2009. 3) Learned Counsel for the respondents opposed the present application and submitted that it bears no substance and, therefore, same be rejected. 4) For the reasons stated in the application and more particularly in paragraph nos. 2 and 3 thereof, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. Moreover, it 2 also appears that the said delay is not willful, deliberate and intentional and deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 5) In the result, the present application allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) thereof; and delay of 74 days caused in filing the accompanying criminal application seeking leave to file appeal, stands condoned and present application is disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P.DAVARE) JUDGE bdv/1652.10cran