WP/2735/10 1 SSK/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2735 OF 2010 Shri Shashikant Vitthal Bankhele ....Petitioner Versus The Special Recovery Officer, Lala Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. P. S. Dani, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Tekale, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Ms. P. S. Cardozo, AGP for Respondent No.4. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 25th AUGUST, 2010. P.C.: Heard Mr. Dani, learned Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. By the impugned order, the Petitioner’s revision under section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 challenging the proclamation of sale notice and attachment order issued by the District Deputy Registrar came to be rejected. The Petitioner is a Guarantor to the loan obtained by Respondent No.3. A recovery certificate under section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is obtained by the Respondent No.2 against Respondent No.3 and the Petitioner. The Petitioner has not challenged this recovery certificate by filing any proceedings and thus, same has become final. The Respondent No.2- WP/2735/10 2 SSK/ Bank can recover recoverable dues under the certificate either from Respondent No.3 or the Petitioner as the liability is simultaneous. The Respondent No.1 attached the property in the year 2004 and charge was also recorded in the year 2004 and thereafter, a proclamation notice was issued. The Petitioner has not made out any ground to challenge this proclamation notice. The learned Divisional Joint Registrar has approached the matter from correct point of view. In the above facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order in writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Petition is, therefore, dismissed. (R. V. MORE, J.)