IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16825 of 2010 1. ANUJ PRASAD S/O LATE KAILASH PRASAD R/O VILL.- TULLAPUR, P.S.- WARISALIGANJ, DISTT.- NAWADAH Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT COMMITTEE THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN P.S. AND DISTT.- NAWADAH 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NAWADAH, DISTT.- NAWADAH 4. THE DISTRICT ESTABLISHMENT DEPUTY COLLECTOR, NAWADAH, DISTT.- NAWADAH 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, NAWADAH ----------- 2 10/05/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Irrespective of the reason explained in annexure- 8 with regard to the claim of the petitioner for his compassionate appointment, the fact stands that the father of the petitioner who was an Assistant Teacher died in harness on 23.07.1984. Object of appointment on compassionate ground or head is to provide employment to a family member of the deceased employee for immediate relief to the family due to the loss of the bread earner of the family. The fact that the father of the petitioner died in the year 1984 and the family has survived for more than 26 years is a good - 2 - enough ground not to twist the policy of compassionate appointment and give any direction for appointment now. There is yet another issue. From a reading of annexure-8 it seems that some kind of misleading statement was made before the High Court and an order was obtained to consider the case of the petitioner by not placing all facts. It is yet another issue. The Court would not like to rake up the past issue and make any comment thereon. No case for compassionate appointment is made out in favour of the petitioner in any circumstance in the above stated background. This writ application is dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)