IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M- 22461 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 5.10.2009. ... Jasbir Kaur ................ Petitioner vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. R.S. Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Sh. Sudhir Nehra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) As per allegation of the prosecution, petitioner has embezzled an amount of Rs.23,91,000/- Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner simply prepare the bills and no role is played by her. He has further contended that SMO verified the bills and on that account petitioner cannot be held liable. However, this contention cannot be appreciated at this stage because there is specific allegation that an amount of Rs.23,91,000/- has been embezzled by the petitioner. She is also facing trial in a case of similar nature. So, no ground for grant of bail is made out. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed. ( K.C. Puri ) 5.10.2009. Judge chugh