PVR 1 wp6650-10 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6650 OF 2010 Smt.Lalita Satyapa Shidnure ...Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nasik & ors. ...Respondents --- Mr.Vinod N.Tayade, for Petitioner. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & N.D.DESHPANDE,JJ. DATED: 23rd September, 2010 P.C.: 1. The Petitioner by this petition challenges the order passed by the Divisional Commissioner dated 15.2.2010 rejecting the request of the Petitioner for appointing her as PVR 2 wp6650-10 Gramsevika on regular basis. The Divisional Commissioner has observed that in the application for appointment the Petitioner had falsely claimed that she belongs to Special Backward Class, but she failed to produce the validity certificate. He has observed in his order that she had admitted before him that she claimed in her application that she belongs to Special Backward Class. Perusal of the petition shows that the petitioner has nowhere stated that the observations in the order of the Divisional Commissioner that she has accepted before him that in her application she claimed that she belongs to Special Backward Class, is wrong. The Divisional Commissioner also noted in his order that the name of the Petitioner appeared in the selection list of Special Backward Class and that if she is to be treated as a candidate belonging to open category then the marks obtained by her are much below the marks obtained by the last candidate from the selection list of open category. In the petition these observations are PVR 3 wp6650-10 also not disputed. In this view of the matter, therefore, obviously there is no substance in the petition. Hence, the petition is rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (N.D.DESHPANDE,J.) ...