IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2008 / 14TH JYAISHTA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 4056 of 2006() ------------------------------ CRA.13/2006 of SESSIONS COURT, KOZHIKODE ST.664/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE SPECILA JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT(MARAD CASES), KOZHIKODE .................... REVN. PETITIONER: PETITIONER ----------------------------- DR. NIKITHA MOHANDAS, D/O. MANIVELU, DEVIPRIYA, P.O.EDAKKAD, CALICUT-5. BY ADV. SRI.P.NARAYANAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------- 1. M/S. SREE GANESH INVESTMENTS, EDAKKAD, CALICUT-5. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.M.NAZAR SRI.M.C.RATNAKARAN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.R.P. No. 4056 of 2006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of June, 2008 ORDER The petitioner, who is the accused in C.C. No.664 of 2005 on the file of the Special Judicial First Class Magistrate Court (Marad Cases),Kozhikode for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against her concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.No. 5312 of 2008 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsel. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. Money, if any, deposited by the revision petitioner before the trial court pursuant to court orders shall be refunded to the revision petitioner/ accused. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj