IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3278 of 2010 1. SWETAMBER JHA S/O LATE DIGAMBER JHA R/O VILL KOILAKH,P.S. RAJ NAGAR,DISTT-MADHUBANI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SUPAUL 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER TRIVENIGANJ,DISTT-SUPAUL 4. THE ANCHALADHIKARI PRATAPGANJ ANCHAL,SUPAUL ----------- 2. 17.03.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner has been suspended by order dated 26.11.2009. A submission is made that despite passage of three months charges are yet to be framed. Unfortunately this pleading is lacking in the writ application. This application is disposed with the observation that if the petitioner files an application under rule 9(7) of the Bihar C.C.A. Rules 2005 for revocation of the suspension on account of expiry of more than three months without framing charges, the authorities are required to consider his representation in accordance with the observations contained in the Full Bench judgment of this Court reported in 2009 (4) PLJR 272 within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)