@D» $§$§§LE 3%333? Wm; IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WritPetition SNo.é&Q3 /2009 Petitioner: Laxmi Prasad Patel, S/o Shri Ishwar Prasad Patel, aged about 44 years, Block Education Officer, Saranggarh District Raigarh (C.G.) Versus / State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, D. K. S. Bhavan, Raipur (CG). ‘ District Education Officer, Raigarh (CG). Respondents: Shri Bibiyana Tirki, Under Secretary, State of Chhattisgarh, Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Q Versais RfSPaNDENT$ s gaie ca Ca»a.atk§sgarh & Gthers gWrii w r ie 22 he a iém sf Bemsh : Hen’bie Shri Sai§sh K. Agmhairi, J ése :~ 3 fixmcp Mazumtiar, Adveaaw apears an behaé‘f 9f $§nr§ Ltkai$h Vema, mumei §or ihe mtitimer. S§r§¥.3. Dyn eée weraE he ate. warm; A vca u sm “t {g 3a ms 4 aav L rb? 0!} 9 an ; f Nevere 2 . ‘lWn‘H-ih Jun“ ‘1s ccasea? a.$ 1eameu l n2 caunse% awéarmg i' ihe , eiiiien is heard ‘Enai. erée? da€e§ § £ mexwe — F1?) reby "" %} {A wi e I smg cc Educ a 5 R, as ew i!a£sferre§ i0 ’zhe affice of the 3%s’iric‘i Eziacaiierz $ff§£e:, Ra§gar§m ‘i’he sabs‘rantiai 0 e peiitéoner $ Lestuz’er‘ 335‘ f th 3 etm? aaeres i§2e irar1s§er aide: an he gmum‘s that e ' r arc s be as cmta’ary’ me n y, the K ef r ste S gem ami he peer M?“ i e beiuore as mcz a? e n t émwe he been pesneu 4- aé at é: the ee§on o§ ’zhe Déstiéct E e Ger em z":- pesiéy‘sg wace h b weoee ed { i “e z e ge i ma; e; awe 23 9 (. 0 e e u mad me mme' § aisee uy he r s em‘er d 2g-8-2&8§ (Amexme — W he has been trensewed am a Sher: ae pe ”h presem émeugned eider has been passed Thus, z e ameuafaed {aarsf mdef§s ii§ega§, am?” ry a’ad bad iaw E have heerei iearnee" ea nae: apeeam e be Dawes herdsea the p§eedmgs ar: tee documea he aeeeneed mefet» “1 ti‘e rece a, ii s evident that b‘v’ cider é ‘ea 9—$~2§S§ ihe p Ia oner has beew yested as Seeuiy Prmcma§ m ovemment N‘suiti Purkeose Hignea’ becondary uchcni, Seyangarh. The same came: be he§d as tfansfen as ihea'e was no change 0f :“esm'ence ane’ ihes’e was ne eisiurieance R the f n :53; fumtiemm or Ire eetm eex ease §§ és e m. U”! amo dude A c b or z Sna: u imsa> $rg$ mr m p i i3r<DtR QRMJ , 5 fn 53a i s i c s év ‘arz a aim am“ Ch ital. cfanaarh Diis t aigsm h n aaue “hm t ir 3? e ie: ”a e’z gsed m araeye, yosm de“ w eac f wuhm ep Ga rm». e 2@ We iaw *n E ihr‘sfe! peiicy §s a rage §u§de§§ae and §i is nat emfai’ceabie by way cf writ m xercase Gf Wm jurasdlctam m Ewe an Cami. Theie § ma 3§3egaiatv Ar m‘imiw m *he e den The 3ame §3 gust, pmpe? am; (ices m)? warfan’t amy §ntezf£§ence af Ehis Csam. The 9e§t§oaer has been transferread fwm Safamam i9 Ramai’h Le. withm a déstance cf emu? 55 kms. 5e that as §t may: §t isweié-seiiied ihat {{a:3$fer is an immdame m‘ servace and at is ¥or the ew‘paove: i0 “acide asm .rvheare aamcui 0ff§cer/em§§6yee be aosied. Keeping in wew gmbsic interest as weii a3 adminisirative ex%genz:y. W133 Cam": has amated j rsswci‘on to int¢rfnr~ With he iransfei’ maiéei', excepi in The cases 0f pmved maia fide, nen-competgnce cf authority gassing the ifansfea' maier am“; no? being in conformity wi’m the mies and ieguie‘iicns. "fee petitionen’empioyee canncrt be permiiied is iemair at one mace urever imder t,“ pic one sf service miss, empioyea’ has aii the po‘v‘!ei's to "m an empieyee ai‘ " rmwiaa piece m mew <3? m‘b ac ieieresi mid aummatra’ti e exagen y (aee E‘PReyappa v. Sfafe e? Term? Nada and amthef, Shiipi Base {Maj and whens v. $¥aie 9f Eiher éi amzeef, ijeiae of indie and anoiher v. Jeeerdhae 5eeaiiaih éi armies? Siafe of M P and anoiher v, <3 S Kwrv emf oihers" and Mord masoca Ahinea 3/ wieie e? U P is wrens "' in Chief Cemmefciei Marieger. 30:3??? Ceni’rai Reii‘wey, Secundereéed & Gihers m GM Rainam & Qibersi ihe Sugreme (2mm obsewed es under 2 G) .1 § “‘3 it is weii semea ii‘ai ihe gentmi Governmem er the $tate Goaemmeni can give admiiwisiraiive ins‘émciicns ta its eewarsts haw iv; as! in certain ciirums avw es; but éhai wiii net make such instrucrxens stemiew :‘uiee whish are jiisiiciabie in a‘xiain ciiruwstamces. in Qréei met sue exam We inetmctiens haee ’me fora: o! siatuicry m e, ii: must be ahewn tir‘at *hey have been ieseed either wider the euthariiy canieired {m éhe Seem; Government er the $§aie Gwemmeni by eame Staiate 9r weer same previsicms of ihe Cansiituiien ! him ii abc 3 {i99 i) Supo 2 CC 659 «004) 4 pc ‘45 4 (1995) 3 scc 27o 09V} a sec 1 e0 Quin a SC” 2*2 < a ravidéng 2hewfm. Thereasye. even if thefe vaa$ been any breach cy’ such execut§ve instrucééons éhai does mt cePEe? aw; yighi‘ an anv member of ihe wub§§c to ask for a wait agamsi: ihe Government by a getition andev Articb 228 cf the CemiiwQmF, cf india. " 8. Even othefwise, éhere is n0 chaiéehge is the émpugwd tyansgFa‘; away“ an any ather permiss§bie iega§ gram aa "fGrgséa'igi wezramtmg 's intafereaca wit?) ihe immagmé tmrwfeir Qwer. g. F0? ihe i‘easens as aforesiated, the p iiiim is ci§sm§ssed ai the motion siagc— itseh‘. E ‘ ' Sd/- ‘ Satish K.Agnihatri f i‘ ‘ V udge Gewri \ J