1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 15295 of 2008 Decided on: 22.6.2011 Surjit Singh ….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others. ....Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP- T No. 2145 of 2008 titled as Mandeep Kumar and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, CWP-T No. 2182 of 2008 titled as Aman Dogra and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others and CWP-T No. 2267 of 2008 titled as Vinod Kumar and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 21st February, 2011. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-State to consider the case of the petitioner in view of the principles laid down in the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No 2 judgment cited herein above, within a period of ten weeks, after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. Petitioner shall also be held entitled to all the consequential benefits. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge. June 22, 2011 (hl)