IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.15325 of 2011 Date of Decision.23.08.2011 Vinod Kumar, Contractor, son of Sh. Sham Lal, resident of Kartar Colony, Military Area, Nabha, District Patiala .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through Secretary, Department of Irrigation, Mini Secretariat, Sector 9, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Notice of motion. 2. At the asking of Court, Mr. Navdeep Sukhna, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents for proper communication of the order. Learned counsel for the petitioner will supply four copies of the writ petition to the State counsel. 3. The petitioner points out that even in a reply given to demand notice issued by the petitioner, the respondents have admitted the petitioner's entitlement and have stated that the money will be released to the petitioner as soon as funds are made available. The amount for which notice has been issued and for which liability is admitted by respondents, shall be released within four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4. The writ petition is disposed of. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 23, 2011 Pankaj*