-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 210 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 317 OF 2008 Mrs. Poonam Hemant Sawhney ... Appellant veersus Hemant Sawhney ... Respondent Mr. B.V. Holambe Patil, instructed by Mr. K.H. Holambe Patel, for the appellant. Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the respondent. WITH FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 24 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 180 OF 2009 Hemant Sawhney ... Appellant versus Mrs. Poonam Hemant Sawhney ...Respondent Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the appellant. Mr. B.V. Holambe Patil, instructed by Mr. K.H. Holambe Patel, for the respondent. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & R.V. MORE, JJ. DATE: NOVEMBER 03, 2009. -2- P.C. Both the above appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 4th September, 2008, passed by the Judge, Family Court No.2, Mumbai, in Petition No. A-1400/2000, by which the Family Court granted decree of divorce and also granted maintenance at the rate of Rs. 7,000/- per month. 2. At the time of hearing of these appeals, the Court is informed that the appellant and the respondent have settled their disputes. Consent terms duly signed by the parties and their Advocates are placed on record and marked “X” for the purpose of identification. Order in terms of the consent terms. 3. As per the said consent terms, the husband has in all paid Rs. 29,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty nine lakhs only) to the wife. The wife had received Rs. 15,00,000/- by way of demand draft which she had encashed and today Rs. 14,00,000/- by way of demand draft, in all Rs. 29,00,000/- as per the consent terms. 4. In view of the above, the wife forgoes her claim towards maintenance and accepts the decree of divorce granted by the Family Court. The wife who is also personally present submits that she is also not interested in any other monetary claim including her claim of stridhan or getting back the -3- Maruti car. She has submitted that she is accepting the above in full and final settlement of all her claims against the husband. 5. So far as quashing of criminal complaint is concerned, this Court is of the opinion that the parties will have to approach the concerned Court for quashing the same, relying upon the consent terms placed before us. Liberty is granted to the parties to approach the concerned Court for quashing the criminal proceedings. 6. It is pointed out that the wife has filed a maintenance suit being Suit No. C-129/2008 in the Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai, which is still pending. In view of these consent terms, the said proceedings shall stand terminated. Writ of this Court be sent to the Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai, for disposing of the said suit in view of the consent terms. 7. In view of the above, both the Appeals as also the Civil Applications are disposed of. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. R.V. MORE, J.