IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27154 of 2008 SUMAN KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ---with--- Cr.Misc. No.35668 of 2008 SHIV KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ---with--- Cr.Misc. No.35892 of 2008 PRATAP PANDIT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 20.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners’ prayer was rejected earlier in the case of preliminary stage. Up till now, there is no cogent evidence. It is not a case of demand of ransom, rather victim’s affair with some girl for marriage can be suspected for his disappearing and refusal orders itself, only the petitioners’ prayer was refused. Petitioner in Cr. Misc. no. 27154/2008 is in custody since 26.03.2007 and petitioners in Cr. Misc. no. 35668/2008 and Cr. Misc. no. 35892/2008 are in custody since 11.03.2007. In my view, their further incarceration is not justified. The application is allowed. Let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional 2 Sessions Judge IXth , Patna in connection with Gardanibagh (Shastrinagar) P.S. Case no. 150 of 2007 (Sessions Trial no. 415 of 2008). shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)