CRM-M No. 25828 of 2011 **** Rinku Sharma v. State of Haryana Present: Mr. Jainainder Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Choudhary, AAG, Haryana. Mr. KDS Hooda, Advocate for the complainant. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No.153 dated 01.03.2011 under Sections 415/420/467/468/471/120-B/34 IPC registered at Police Station Civil Lines, District Hisar. Affidavit of DSP Hisar has been filed. Taken on record. In the affidavit it has been clarified that the loss amount has been paid by the accused party. Learned counsel for the complainant is not in a position to deny this. On 29.09.2011 the following order was passed:- “ On 30.8.2011, the following contention was noticed :- “ Relies upon order dated 25.08.2011 passed in CRM-M No.23571 of 2011 in the case of co-accused wherein anticipatory bail was granted because the property in dispute had been retransferred to the complainant.” Counsel for the complainant has argued that even though the property has been transferred back yet during the time it wrongly stood in the name of the accused persons, they had taken a loan from HDFC bank which has been got returned by the complainant. Counsel for the petitioner, on the other hand, states that no money has been paid by the complainant. In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to direct the Investigating Officer to submit a report on CRM-M No. 25828 of 2011 -2- this aspect. Adjourned to 20.10.2011. Interim order to continue, meanwhile.” In the circumstances this petition is allowed. In case the petitioner is arrested, he shall be released on bail by the investigating officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE October 20, 2011 sunita