IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.21734 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : DECEMBER 15, 2010 MONTI KAMBOJ ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Dheeraj Bali, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1. This petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to provide complete information which was demanded by the petitioner vide application dated 12.1.2010 (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of the Court towards application (Annexure P-1) filed by the petitioner in the context of Annexure P-5 i.e. the information provided by the respondent- Gram Panchayat through its Sarpanch, in response to order dated 5.10.2010 (Annexure P-3), passed by the State Information Commission, Haryana. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that complete information Civil Writ Petition No.21734 of 2010 2 sought under the application has not been provided. 3. I have considered the details of the information sought by the petitioner in the context of information supplied. 4. I am of the opinion that the information has been supplied as can be deciphered from the document (Annexure P-5). 5. In any case, I find the petition to be frivolous insomuch as order (Annexure P-3) is not the final order and it directed the parties to appear before the authority i.e. State Information Commission, on 3.11.2010 at 11.15 AM. A show cause notice has been issued to Smt.Shimla Devi, the State Public Information Officer-cum-Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Sandhali, to show cause why penalty of Rs.250/- for each day of delay, be not imposed. Further, by virtue of the same order, the said Gram Panchayat was directed to furnish complete information. It is the admitted position that after passing of order (Annexure P-3), the information (Annexure P-5) has been supplied. 6. Considering the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, no ground for interference in extra ordinary writ jurisdiction is made out. 7. The petition is dismissed in limine. December 15, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?