IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34394 of 2010 Anil Singh @ Anil Singh Yadav, son of Sri Lochan Singh, Resident of Village Dhan Karha, Police Station Sasaram (Muffasil), District Rohtas at Sasaram…………………………………….….Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar……………………..Opposite party ----------- 2 22.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. It appears that when the petitioner’s application for anticipatory bail was considered and disposed of by the learned Sessions Judge, Rohtas, the alleged agreement between him and one M/s Hiralal Agencies Private Limited Company, authorizing him to conduct blasting operation, as contained in Annexure-2, was not placed for consideration before it. Therefore, petitioner is granted liberty to move the learned Sessions Judge afresh and produce evidence in his favour to establish that he was assigned with job of conducting blasting operation under a valid agreement with the company for the purpose, in course of which he was keeping the materials for blasting in his office. The court below shall examine the materials 2 which may be produced by the petitioner and if it is satisfied that the materials produced by the petitioner are genuine and prima facie establish the case of the petitioner, it shall take the same into account and pass appropriate orders on the application of the petitioner in accordance with law. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)