IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No. 922 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 5, 2010 Suresh Kumar Kaushik …Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Mr. Jagdeep Singh, Advocate, for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. The appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent challenges order dated 30.7.2010, passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No. 13436 of 2010. Learned Single Judge has refused to interfere in the order of transfer passed by the respondents. The argument that the transfer has been ordered by an authority lower than the competent authority has been rejected. Even before us, there is nothing to substantiate the aforesaid argument. A glance at the relieving order dated 17.7.2010 (P-2), does not show that the transfer of the petitioner- appellant has been ordered by an authority lower than the competent LPA No. 922 of 2010 (O&M) authority. In the relieving order a reference of an order passed by the Civil Surgeon, Mewat Mandikhera, dated 14.7.2010, has been made. However, the petitioner-appellant has not been able to produce either before the learned Single Judge or before us the relevant order to substantiate his submission that the transfer has been ordered by an authority lower than the competent authority. There is no merit in the appeal warranting admission. Dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (A.N. JINDAL) August 5, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2