THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CONTEMPT CASE No. 603 of 2010 O R D E R: Learned counsel for the petitioner herein, upon instructions, has pointed out that the petitioner herein has not sought for any adjournment before the Agent to the Government and the District Collector, West Godavari at Eluru and on the other hand, it is the appellant before the Agent to the Government who sought for repeated adjournments. In view of the same, there is no necessity to impose any compensatory costs on this petitioner for initiating the contempt of Court action. Hence, the Contempt Case is dismissed in view of the final orders passed by the Agent to the Government in the appeal preferred, but however, without costs. ---------------------------------- (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 23rd August 2010 ksld