IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8858 of 2010 1. BADAMU CHAUHAN, SON OF LATE BISHWANATH NONIYA 2. KRIPA NARAYAN SINGH, SON OF LATE PRABHU NARAYAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15/03/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the Informant and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 420, 465, 468, 120B and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. A dispute between two parties over the Mahanthship of a Gram Vidhyalaya and Ashram has given rise to the present complaint which was sent to the Police under Section 56(3) Cr.P.C. for institution of an F.I.R. In view of the nature of dispute between the parties, let the petitioners above named, who are in custody since 11.1.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in connection with Semari P.S. Case No. 153 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and - 2 - thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)