1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.1246 OF 2009 Kotak mahindra Prime Ltd .. Petitioner -versus Singh Komal Jayprakash .. Respondent Mr. Prasad Das i/b Goenka Law Associates for the Petitioner. Mr. Rakesh Kumar with V.S. Jabra, for respondent. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED: 27th January, 2010 P.C. 1. Apparently even recall of letter of petitioner is dated 26th December, 2005. The submission that the claim raised itself is beyond limitation and therefore, the present petition under section 9 arising out of the same arbitration clause/agreement is not maintainable. Submissions is that the cheques were bounced. Without going into the merits of the matter, keeping all points open for Arbitrator to decide, I am not inclined to pass any order. Interim order already granted has been vacated and also for the reason 2 that the property is not exclusively owned by the Respondent. 2. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)