IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43720 of 2010 1.Md. Shamim Dakiya, son of Abdul Hassan 2.Md.Kalam, son of Atabul 3.Md.Shamirul, son of Late Janta All are resident of village Garha, P.S. Pupri, District- Sitamarhi …………… Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar …………. Opp.Party ----------- 2. 26/03/2011 Case is under section 341, 323, 313 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that earlier police had submitted final form reporting the case to be false, but the protest petition filed by the complainant was treated as a complaint and cognizance has been taken against the petitioners. From the order of the learned court below it appears that all the witnesses examined in the enquiry have supported the case of the informant. In the circumstances, this Court is not inclined to allow the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner. It is accordingly dismissed. Petitioners may appear before the court below within four weeks from today and move for regular bail. If along with the regular bail application, 2 petitioners file a petition that they will make the complainant/informant compromise and shall make endeavour to file compromise petition within a reasonable time, the court below shall allow provisional bail to the petitioners for the said time to enable them to compromise the matter and file compromise petition and shall dispose of the bail application on the basis of said compromise petition. However, if the petitioner fails to do so within the time fixed by the court, it shall be at liberty to dispose of the application on merits. Let this order be communicated to the court below through Fax at the cost of the petitioners. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)