IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO :16874 of 2009 Between: A.Lalitha and two others ..... PETITIONERs AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Hyderabad And seven others .....RESPONDENT(S) THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.P.No.16874 of 2009 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondents in not implementing the injunction order granted by Principal Junior Civil Judge in I.A.No.1000 of 2009 in O.S.No.897 of 2009 dated 6.8.2009 and consequently direct the respondents to implement the said injunction order and not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful stay in the house bearing No.1-1-353, RBI Colony, Mohan Nagar, Kothapet, Ranga Reddy District and to pass such other orders. 2. It is the case of the petitioners that they are the tenants of residential house bearing No.1-1-353 situated in plot No.10, RBI Colony, Mohan Nagar, Kothapet, Uppal Revenue Mandal, Rangareddy District, which is belonging to the 7th respondent. The petitioners state that all of a sudden, the 7th respondent, along with his henchmen, came to the subject house on 02.08.2009 and ordered them to vacate the house on or before 08.08.2009, and there upon they requested him to grant time up to the end of August, 2009, but he did not consider their request inspite of complaining the same to the Police officials, they are not taking any action and instead helping the unofficial respondents in their attempts. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Basing on the instructions dated 27.8.2009 given by the Station House Officer, Saroornagar Police Station, Cyberabad, the learned Government Pleader appearing for the Official respondents submits that, on 10.8.2009, the petitioners informed over telephone to the Saroornagar Police that the 7th respondent tried to evict them from the subject premises, and thereupon, the Police, Saroornagar, visited the petitioners’ house on the same day and warned the 7th respondent not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners of the subject house, in view of the injunction order dated 6.8.2009 in I.A.No.1000 of 2009 in O.S.No.897 of 2009. He further submits that Saroornagar Police at no point of time interfered with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the un-official respondents. 4. The relief that is sought by the petitioners is to direct the official respondents to implement the injunction orders passed in I.A.No.1000 of 2009 in O.S.No.897 of 2009 by the Civil Court. 5. It is their grievance that the police officials have been supporting the un- official respondents in their attempts to evict them from subject premises. However, the written instructions obtained by the learned Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents would clearly show that the Police, Saroornagar warned the 7th respondent not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners in view of the injunction order passed by the Civil Court. It is also submitted that the Police never interfered with the civil disputes between the parties. 6. In view of these instructions, I do not find any justification to pass any order in this writ petition and the writ petition is liable to be closed. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs. ________________ G.CHANDRAIAH,J 8th October, 2009 PNV