IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 22435 of 2006 Between: D.Sambasiva Rao S/o.D.Ramakrishna Rao R/o.6-3-596/47/A/1, Venkataramana Colony, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. 2 Manage SBI Cards, Ashok Bhupal Chambers, Begumpet, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: None Counsel for Respondent No.1: GP FOR HOME Counsel for Respondent No.2: ----- The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: ‘to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the action of the 2nd respondent as ultra virus of law, of RBI NORMS, illegal, arbitrary and against the settled principles of law and the same shall be stopped forthwith and direct the 1st respondent to act upon the representation of petitioner dt. 16th October, 2006, pass such other orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.’ On 19-06-2009, there was no representation for the petitioner. Even today, when the Writ Petition is called, no one represented the petitioner. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the cause in the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed for default. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.28511 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 26th June, 2009 lur