AB 88/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. K. MERUNO Heard Mr. S M Abdullah P, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the pet itioner and also Mr. B.S. Sinha, learned Addl. PP, for the State. Mr. S M Abdullah P, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner in this bail application is also similarly situated as the petiti oner in BA No.3199 of 2010, who was also implicated in the same North Lakhimpur P.S. Case No.127 of 2010 under section 306 IPC. The petitioner in the said BA No .3199/2010 had approached this Court for bail and this Court had passed an order dated 16.08.2010 granting pre-arrest bail to the said petitioner for two weeks to enable him to approach the Court of the CJM, North Lakhimpur and apply for ba il, which had been disposed of in accordance with law. The petitioner in this ba il application, being similarly situated, is praying that the same benefit may b e extended to him. The learned Addl. PP appearing for the State also submits tha t since the petitioner is similarly situated, the Court may pass appropriate ord er accordingly. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and since the petition er is similarly situated as that of the petitioner in BA No.3199 of 2010, regist ered under the same police station case number, this bail application is also di sposed of with the direction that in the event of arrest of the petitioner by the Investigating Officer in connection with the said North Lakhi mpur P.S. Case No.127/2010, under section 306 IPC, he shall be released on bail of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand) with one surety of the like amount subj ect to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. The pre-arrest bail shall r emain in force till 28.01.2011 till which date the petitioner shall approach the Court of CJM, North Lakhimpur and apply for bail which shall be disposed of in accordance with law. With the above observations and direction, this bail application stands disposed of.