IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WEALTH TAX APPLICATION NO. 9 OF 2000 The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Mumbai, City-II, Mumbai .. Applicant V/s. M/s. Urmila & Co. Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai .. Respondent Mr. R.V. Desai with Mr. R. Ashokan for the Applicant None present for the Respondent CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 11.02.2005 DATED : 11.02.2005 DATED : 11.02.2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant. Perused the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 24.8.1999, wherein it is clearly observed that the order of the Commissioner, Wealth Tax has been set aside and the consequent orders passed therein also have become infructuous. As the question sought to be raised in this Application arises out of the consequent orders, as such now nothing survives in this Application, hence the same stands dismissed. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)