IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Appellate Side Writ Petition No.l593 of 2005 Dr Vikram S Ghole..Petitioner vs Mr Sudhakar P Nagarkar....Respondent Mr P K Dhakephalkar for J S Deo for petitioner CORAM: A.P.SHAH J. CORAM: A.P.SHAH J. CORAM: A.P.SHAH J. Dated 14.9 .2005 Dated 14.9 .2005 Dated 14.9 .2005 P.C: . Heard Mr Dhakephalkar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the record. The petitioner landlord is claiming possession of suit premises on various grounds.The suit has been dismissed by the trial court which decision has been confirmed by the appellate court. The only ground pressed by Mr Dhakephalkar is that the tenant has caried alteration of permanent nature by demolishing the partition wall in the suit shop. The lower courts on appreciation of material on record have held that no dividing wall existed in the suit shop and therefore question of demolition of any such wall does not arise . I do not see any ground to interfere with the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the courts below. Petition is dismissed.