HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISG‘A ‘ WRIT PETITI0N,,(§)N0.4373 OF 2009 w \ §PETITIONER ‘Umar Khan aged about 15 vears being mm... £m “ugh ms nam'a' gHard‘an Mural Khan agea about 48 years Slo Late Mahd l-gamf Khan R/n Ca'cwta Sama= Tahsii & Ist Ramandgaan r Dhaba mage andnpun, Post render! ‘ Versus RESPONDENw 1. The state of enhatt:agarh threuah its Secretary, Ed 53mm Depa'went, Raxpur District Education Officer, Ragnandgaon Navin High $chcoi, thrown its Pnnmpal. Bhagwr; Ra}a Bha pm f Dist. ‘ Rajnandgacn. 4. Smt. Shobhanjaii Shrivasztava‘ Principai Navin High $chcs!, Bhanpur§. Raja Bhanpuri Dist. Rajnandgaon. 5.‘ Chhathsgarh Board of $econdéry Eduvatisn thrcugh its Secretary, Pension .l ‘ Bada Rarpur (Writ petition under Artiéle 226 of thé Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon‘bie Shri, Saiish K. Agnihotri, J. ' Present :- Shri Parag Kotec’na counsei for ihe peiitioner Shn Amrito Das Pane! Lawyer for the State ORuER :0 L} (Passed on this 2”“ day of september. 2009) i » Heard learned cousin for the panties. By this oetitiori the petitioner seeks a direction to tne resoo’noienis to issue mark sheet of ciass 1X examination of the petmoner iThe > petitioner further pravs for compensation and a drreotion to the respondents No.1 & 2 to initiate discipi‘inaryaction againstgtne respondent No.4. V g Shri Amr‘rto Das teamed Panet Lawyer appearing for the state, submits that the State Government by its ietier dated 24-7-2009 ‘ (Annexure — P/6) has directed the resoondents No 3 & 4 to issue R ‘ Ix. mark sheet 0f class IX examihation of the academic session 2008-09 i J to the petitioner. it is further contempiated by the $tate to take‘ action for not ith the directions. 4. necessary complying , In view of foregoing the respondent ‘ No.3 & 4 are errected to comply x with the retter dated 24-7-2609 (V nnexure ~ W6) of the District Education and iseue mark sheet‘of ciass 2X '1 A Officer, Rainandgaon, iseue examination to the petitioner forthwit . > '5‘. Since the initiation of discxpiinary aqtron against the reepondent No.4 to be under consideration ioy the responcients No.1 & 2, no appears order is necessary on this issue 6. With the aforesaid directionethe writ petition is disposed of. Gowri