IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH : HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH (14TH) DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN Present: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Criminal Petition No.11617 of 2010 Between: Mohd. Mehraj … Petitioner And: Smt. Noor Jahan Begum & another … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Criminal Petition No.11617 of 2010 ORDER: Petitioner-accused and the first respondent-de-facto- complainant present. Sri C. Damodar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner present. It is stated that the petitioner is none else than the son-in-law of the first respondent-de-facto complainant. Pursuant to a small incident in the family, first respondent has given a complaint against the petitioner to the police and subsequently, both the parties compromised and dissolved the dispute amicably. Memorandum of compromise is also filed signed by both the parties and the same is placed on record. The first respondent states that in view of the compromise, she is no longer interested in prosecuting the petitioner, who is her son-in-law. 2. As both the parties have entered into compromise and in pursuance thereof, the 2nd respondent is not interested in prosecuting the petitioner, it is considered that no useful purpose would be served by continuing further proceedings against the petitioner in Cr.No.111 of 2009 of Humayun Nagar PS. It is therefore considered a fit case to invoke inherent powers of the Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash further proceedings in Cr.No.111 of 2009 of PS Humayun Nagar, against the petitioner and they are liable to be quashed and accordingly quashed. 3. In the result, the criminal petition is disposed of as stated above. ____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J Date: 14.12.2010 bss