;^ vv C\ 't!< IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.P. No. r^J^tQ /2005 PETITIONER Smt. Kanti Shukla, Wd/o. LateShrijy.P. Shukla, aged about 64 years, R/o. Opp. Highway Channel, Ambedkar Ward, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh VERSUS RESPONDENTS : /. A^t -..-^M •••^5^ •/2. <3. /State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh Department of Home Affairs, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh The Director General of Police, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Police Headquari:ers, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Inspector General of Police, Bastar Division, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh ^: The Superintendent of Police, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IC-22 ^3?7^T'^T f^ri^'^n^T ^HW^f^T ^"^ ;:5TF:iM?T, ^flWT®,f^iray 3Ti^T ^a^, ^.tN\).lo^^ 1RFS?3T'%W^? """*<<a'*]t**<*"T|^ 200 'fe^sr' ^T^T^^T^R-^T S8: Hon'ble Shri WSaniiidra IVIohan Sh 03-05-2010 Shri J. P. Shukla, counsel forthe Shri Sanjeev Kumar Agrawai, Pan^ With the consent of learned cou heardfinatly. This case pertains to grievance o{ counsel appearing for the petitioner, on may be referred to the Pension Committ^ the petitioner and various dues raised in This Court, in W.P.No.4642/2004 Chhattlsgarh & others) and other connecte to consider the matter of retrial dues as tt| involved. The Committee was constituted to the order dated 19-06-2006 passed in Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Chh| dated 13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. No. and others Vs. Baijnath Mandat and anothj covered by the judgment and order dat W.P.N0.4642Q004 (Baijnath Mandal (suprj appearing forthe parties. This petition is accordingly dispcj; office of the Advocate Generat is directed ^thin a period of 15 days from the datej Thereafter, the Committee shal! issue m concerned within a further period of 15 d^ and pass order, in accordance with law, hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner ^i^F<n4l"( 'HT^f ^ f^7^t <f^i^« iT3tf^R3T[^T ^astava,J. )fetitioner. |1 Lawyer for the State/respondents. Isel for the parties, the petition is |non-grant of retiral dues. Learned Istructions, submits that the matter ^e for consideration of the case of |is petition. [Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of fc! matters, directed the Cornmittee |e disputed question of facts were ty the State Government, pursuant t/V.P.No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai sttisgarh and others), and order 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh ar). Thus, this petition is squarely sd 31st January, 2008 passed in i) as submitted by learned counsel »ed of in the same terms i.e., the send the case to the Committee, 3f receipt of a copy of this order. :ice to the petitioner and officers ys. The Committee shatl consider ter affording proper opportunity of d the officers concerned may fiie J— [Tft^ •^f?37I T / f^....: ' f i '^fe-^ 'v^s^ -%s 1 I-BC-22 ^oET ^TqT^?, '^fte!TT^, {ol^TRTy 3ff^T 'q?ra? ^.(.T^. 2.0^ ^P^HT^HI^ ^s~ "M 200 ^^r* 3^1 ^T ^^ 3TI^T 9h^i^ ^[^a Tumane ^TI^T ^'^TTW^Tf^' -L- additiona! documents, if necessary, The entirje exercise, inctuding payment of retira! dues, if any, to the petitioner, be ccjmpleted within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of tt| The petitioner shall supply one co|nplete set of the petition to the State counsel as well as counsel for the Acl the same to the Committee. 4>l^fd41-l ^ll^dl^'fe^Tf^SR ^'srf^TR'3TI^ is order. l^ountant General for transferring Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge 1-. [^ -^fe^