1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. FIRST APPEAL NO.1044 OF 2004. FIRST APPEAL NO.1044 OF 2004. FIRST APPEAL NO.1044 OF 2004. WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.632 OF 2005. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.632 OF 2005. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.632 OF 2005. The State of Maharashtra : Appellants. versus Shri Chandrakant Anant Vankudre : Respondent. Mr.V.B.Sakhare, AGP, for the State. None for the respondent. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. DATED : 6th June 2005. DATED : 6th June 2005. DATED : 6th June 2005. ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER 1. Heard the learned AGP for the State. The state has filed this appeal against enhancement of compensation by Rs.79,000/- and odd. Acquired property was three storeyed wooden framed structure with projected gallery. The claimants 2 2 2 were doing business. The SLAO awarded compensation Rs.64,000/- and odd. That was enhanced by the reference Court by Rs.79,000/- and odd. 2. Looking to the nature of the property acquired and the loss of business that was suffered by the claimants, the enhancement cannot be said to be unjust or improper. Hence there is no merits in this appeal. It is dismissed along with the Civil Application. No order as to costs. [D.G.DESHPANDE] 06/06/2005 JUDGE.