IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 7831 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 2.12.2010 Jasvir Singh ......petitioner vs. Amritsar Improvement Trust, Amritsar and others ......respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. Sanjeev Manrai, Advocate for the petitioner HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) The grievance of the petitioner is that the application of the petitioner under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure in a suit for permanent injunction has not been decided. In the said application, the petitioner has claimed that defendants No. 1 and 2 be restrained from executing the sale deed, in favour of defendant No.3 with regard to the suit property till the final decision of the suit. Keeping in view the fact that the doctrine of lis pendence is applicable in respect of any sale affected during the pendency of the suit, I do not find any indulgence is necessary in the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 2.12.2010 preeti