IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION NO :2525 of 2010 Between: S.M.Ahammed ..... PETITIONER AND The Govt. of A.P. Rep. by its Secretary, Law Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & Others. .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No. 2525 OF 2010 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Gopal Reddy) This writ petition is filed questioning the show-cause notice issued by the disciplinary authority-cum-District Judge, East Godavari District at Rajahmundry, dated 27.10.2009 informing the petitioner that the report submitted by the enquiry officer is not acceptable and that the material available warrants imposing punishment against the petitioner and accordingly the reasons for modification of the findings of enquiry officer were enclosed with the notice calling upon the petitioner to show-cause as to why the punishment proposed shall not be imposed on him. On petitioner submitting his explanation, final orders were passed on 7.1.2010 dismissing the petitioner from service with immediate effect. Questioning the dismissal order, petitioner filed a statutory appeal to this Court on administrative side, dated 27.1.2010. While the said appeal is pending consideration, the present writ petition is filed questioning the show-cause notice without questioning the final orders passed on 7.1.2010. Having regard to the fact that the show-cause notice, dated 27.10.2009 was culminated into the final orders, dated 7.1.2010 dismissing the petitioner from service and as the final order has already been challenged before the appellate authority, the present writ petition questioning the show-cause notice cannot be entertained. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Petitioner is at liberty to raise all the grounds which are available to him before the appellate authority and if the order under appeal goes against him, he can challenge the same in appropriate proceedings. No order as to costs. _________________ (A. GOPAL REDDY, J.) _________________ (NOUSHAD ALI, J.) FEBRUARY 10, 2010 TSR