1 CAR.10/2010 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10 OF 201O IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2010 Kondaji Ravaba Avhad . . ...Appellant. Vs. Krantiveer Vasantrao Narayanrao Naik Shikshan Prasark Mandal & Ors. ....Respondents ..... Mr. G.S. Godbole, i/b Nitin Mulye, for the Appellant. Mr. P.N. Joshi, for Respondent No.2. ---- CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 23rd JULY, 2010. P.C. Rule. 1] All Respondents except Respondent No.6 are duly served. The contesting Respondent No.2 is represented by learned Advocate Shri Joshi. With his consent, the Civil Application is taken up forthwith. 2] Considering that the issue as to whether the proceedings could be termed as “Arbitration” under he Arbitration and Conciliation 2 CAR.10/2010 Act, 1996, so also final outcome is an “Award” or not, being raised, ad-interim order dated 11.6.2010 to continue till the hearing and final disposal of the Appeal. Needless to state that the parties can avail other remedies which are available in law. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.