THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32637 of 2010 Date: 29.12.2010 Between : Avatar Mehar Baba Premalaya Kendram Trust, Chandrampet village, Sircilla Mandal, Karimnagar District, rep.by its Chairman. … Petitioner And The Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar District and others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32637 of 2010 ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction by way of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.1 and 2 in not registering the case against the 3rd respondent, who is trying to kill the petitioner, pursuant to his complaint, dated 16.12.2010, as arbitrary and illegal and consequently sought a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to investigate the complaint and take appropriate action. 3. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the 3rd respondent is threatening to kill him and inspite of his complaint, dated 16.12.2010, no case is registered against the 3rd respondent. 4. When the matter is called, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has submitted a representation, dated 16.12.2010, to the Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar District, alleging that he is the Chairman of Sri Avatar Mehar Baba Premalaya Kendram Trust, Sircilla Mandal, Karimnagar District, and the 3rd respondent was removed from the Vice- Presidentship of the Trust and as such the 3rd respondent and his henchmen are threatening and warned the petitioner that that they will kill him. It is also submitted that the Superintendent of Police has endorsed on the said representation to the Inspector of Police, Sircilla, on 20.12.2010, and subsequently a case in Crime No.402 of 2010 for the offence punishable under Sections 290 and 506 of IPC is registered against the 3rd respondent. 5. Although it is the case of the petitioner that he has submitted a representation to the 2nd respondent, but in view of the endorsement made by the 1st respondent-Superintendent of Police, a crime has been registered against the 3rd respondent. Therefore, it cannot be said that respondent Nos.1 and 2 have not acted upon the complaint of the petitioner. 6. In that view of the matter, since Crime No.402 of 2010 had already been registered against the 3rd respondent, the writ petition is disposed of, at the admission stage, keeping it open to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to investigate into the said crime and take appropriate action in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________________ JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY 29.12.2010. Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32637 of 2010 29.12.2010 (Msr)