1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.78 OF 2005 ... Shri Gurunath Shripad Ogale ...Petitioner v/s. State of Maharashtra & anr. ...Respondents ... Mr.H.S.Venegavkar for the Petitioner. Mr.S.U.Chinchalikar AGP for State. Mr.Suresh Kumar for Respondent No.2. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, & R.S.MOHITE, JJ DATED: 16 th July, 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner. The entire petition filed by the Petitioner was misconceived. The Petitioner in the petition challenges only 2 the communication to his lawyer pursuant to his request for supply of documents. Neither the original recovery certificate has shown to have been challenged nor the order by which the Petitioner was sent to prision was ever challenged. In our opinion, whatever the reasons given by the learned single Judge, the learned single Judge has rightly declined to entertain the petition. Appeal is disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.)