1 906 wp 446.11.doc K IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 446 OF 2011 Ms.Reshma Sushil Mirchandani & 2 Ors. ..Petitioners. Vs. The Charity Commissioner & 22 Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Rafiq Dada, Senior Advocate with Mr.J.P.Sen i/b M/s. Kartikeya & Associates for Petitioners. Mr.Milind More, AGP for Respondent no.1. Mr.Ravi Kadam, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ashish Kamat, Mr.Ranjit Shetty, Mr.Shailesh Paria, Mr.Aniket Nair i/b M/s Hariani & Co. for Respondent nos. 2 to 16 and 18. Mr.Y.Y.Bhatt, Senior Advocate with Mr.Gautam Ankhad i/b M/s. Federal & Rashmikant for Respondent no.15. CORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED : 24/02/2011. PC: 1 Learned Senior Advocate appearing for Respondent nos.2 to 16 states that neither the Petitioner nor Respondent no.17 has any right to occupy or use the hall which admittedly belongs to these respondents. However, as a matter of good gesture only for this time Respondent nos.2 to 16 will permit “Bal Satsang” of the students of the school of Respondent no.17 on 6th March, 2011 between 8.15 to 10.15 a.m. The statement is accepted. 2 906 wp 446.11.doc 2 Shri Bhatt, Learned Senior Advocate appearing for Respondent no.17 states that “Bal Satsang” would be held on 6th March, 2011 and that it will be held between 8.15 to 10.15 a.m. and that in any case at 10.30 a.m. the hall will be vacated. The statement is accepted. 3 Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that in view of the statements made, which we have accepted above, he withdraws this Petition, as also his Application which is made by him before the Charity Commissioner. He further states that this is not to be treated as precedent and this is being permitted as one time gesture. The statement is accepted. 4 Petition is disposed of. (D.K.Deshmukh, J.) (K.K.Tated, J.)