CWP(T) No. 1391 of 2008 6.01.2011 Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents/State. In the supplementary affidavit the respondents have stated as under:- “II) Para 6(v) That the contents of this sub para are not inter linked. In fact the letter Annexure A-1 has been issued to the in fact respondent to Assistant Engineer on the representation of petitioner through Superintending Engineer wherein he had stated that his Muster Roll has been changed from Helper to Beldar, where as the fact is that the petitioner had been issued Muster Roll of Beldar from the very beginning. This is not connected with his regularization in 2007. The petitioner could not be considered under 2002 policy as he did not completed the criteria and was regularized in 2007. Hence as stated in the reply that after the judgment of this Hon’ble High Court in Gauri Dutt’s case, his case was reviewed and has been regularized from the retrospective date i.e. w.e.f. 01-01-2003 under Mool Raj Upadhaya’s Judgment. Therefore, this petition is not maintainable. Copy of man days of petitioner is annexed as Annexure R-A-II.” 2. In view of the stand taken by the respondents the present petition has become infructuous and is disposed of as such. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. January 6, 2011 (PK)