IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 9TH AUGUST 2011 / 18TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 18635 of 2011(D) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- MOHAYUDEEN, SON OF KOOLIYATTU VALAPPIL, ABOOBACKER HAJI, ATOOR VILLAGE, TALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 582. BY ADV. SRI.P.BHASKARAN, SRI.V.K.NANDAKUMARAN, SRI.P.S.HARIHARAN. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR-680 582. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, WADAKANCHERRY, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 582. 3. K.M. MOHAMMAD, KOMULLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, ATTOOR POST, PIN-680 582, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 582. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.C.M. CHARISMA. R3 BY ADV. SRI.AVM.SALAHUDIN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/08/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 18635 of 2011(D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 02/07/2011. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 05/07/2011. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT BY SIHAB ABDULLAH RAHMANI. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT BY MUSTAFA K.K. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JJ. ------------------------------- WP(C).NO. 18635 of 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose,J. Petitioner has approached this court seeking police protection to the petitioner and his family members against what is described as isolation, discrimination and bigotry in their social and religious life and also protection against the denial of the right to education in the Madrassa classes for the children of the petitioner. The 3rd respondent is the President of the Juma Mahal committee. He has filed a detailed counter affidavit and additional counter affidavit wherein all the allegations are denied. Learned Government Pleader Smt.C.M.Charisma Submitted that Ext.P2 petition was thoroughly enquired into through the 2nd respondent and enquiry revealed that the allegations levelled by the petitioner are incorrect. Advocate Sri.P.Bhaskaran, learned counsel for the petitioner would very fervently submits before us that the averments stated in the writ petition is true. According to him, it was force of an enquiry which was conducted by the WP(C) .18635/2011 2 police. He requested atleast a direction be issued for serious enquiry to be conducted against Ext.P2. We do no think that there is ground for granting any relief. We feel the matter should be relegated to appropriate civil court. We relegate the petitioner to a competent civil court. The civil court will adjudicate the matter and will take the right decision. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE pmn/ WP(C) .18635/2011 3