IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos. 28738 of 2008 and 283 and 4995 of 2009 W.P.No.283 of 2009 Between: Sri Chaitanya Techno Schools, rep., by its Secretary & Correspondent, Hyderabad. ..... Petitioner AND The Govt., of A.P., rep., by its Secretary, School Education Department, Hyderabad & others. .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Rajendra Prasad for Sri T. Sridhar Counsel for the respondents: GP for School Education The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos. 28738 of 2008 and 283 and 4995 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: These Writ Petitions are filed questioning the interference of the respondents with the petitioners conducting talent tests for academic year 2009-2010. Sri Rajendra Prasad, learned counsel representing the petitioner in Writ Petition No.283 of 2009, submitted that in view of expiry of the academic year, for which the Writ Petition is filed, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Since a similar position exists in other cases also, all these Writ Petitions are disposed of as infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy, if and when cause of action arises in future. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petitions as infructuous, WPMP.Nos.37611 of 2008 and 3978 of 2009 and WVMP.No.3 of 2009 in W.P.No.28738 of 2008, WPMP.No.300 of 2009 and 1698 of 2009 in W.P.No.283 of 2009 and WPMP.No.6543 of 2009 in W.P.No.4995 of 2009 are also disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 21.06.2011 ES