Writ Petition no. 44294 of 1999-old number Writ Petition no. 1884 (S/S) of 2001 – New number Neel Kanth----- Petitioner Versus State and others Respondents Writ Petition no. 44299 of 1999-old number Writ Petition no. 1885 (S/S) of 2001 – New number Ram Chandra Singh----- Petitioner Versus State and others Respondents Writ Petition no. 44291 of 1999-old number Writ Petition no. 1883 (S/S) of 2001 – New number Surendra Prasad----- Petitioner Versus State and others Respondents Writ Petition no. 44288 of 1999-old number Writ Petition no. 1882 (S/S) of 2001 – New number Trepan Singh----- Petitioner Versus State and others Respondents Writ Petition no. 32931 of 1999-old number Writ Petition no. 2645 (S/S) of 2001 – New number Smt. Ranuka Badola----- Petitioner Versus State and others Respondents Writ Petition no. 24703 of 1999-old number Writ Petition no. 2496 (S/S) of 2001 – New number Mehar Singh----- Petitioner Versus State and others Respondents Writ Petition no. 13379 of 1999-old number Writ Petition no. 2463 (S/S) of 2001 – New number Balendra Singh----- Petitioner Versus State and others Respondents Writ Petition no. 13398 of 1999-old number Writ Petition no. 1668 (S/S) of 2001 – New number Jeet Pal Singh----- Petitioner Versus State and others Respondents Writ Petition no. 20027 of 1999-old number Writ Petition no. 301 (S/S) of 2001 – New number Mukesh Kumar----- Petitioner Versus State and others Respondents Hon'ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. All the above mentioned writ petition involve common question of law and in these similar relief or regularization in the Forest Department has been claimed. These writ petitions are, therefore, taken up together and disposed of by a common judgment. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel. The petitioners claim themselves to be the daily wage employees in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal no.3634 of 1998 State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned S.C. agree that direction may be given to the respondents to consider the cases of these petitioners in the light of the said judgment of the Apex Court and those of the petitioners who are covered by the said decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court be regularized and minimum of pay scale excluding allowances be also paid to them until their services are regularized. Let the necessary exercise be done within a period of six weeks. All the aforesaid petitions are disposed of accordingly. Let the original judgment be placed on the record of writ petition no.1884(S/S) of 2001 and its coy be placed on the record of other writ petitions. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) July 22, 2003 MPS