IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28200 of 2008 ATMA PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.10.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Police case under Sections 304 of the Penal Code. The allegation is of having performed operation as Quack with a rusted blade. This Court does not consider the present a fit case for the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Counsel for the State refers to the statement of a witness from Para 6 & 8 stating that the petitioner as a Quack. This application is rejected. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)