IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51853 of 2008 HARIKESH KUMAR GOND @ HARIKESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.12.2008 Heard Sri Tarakant Jha, senior counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The earlier prayer for bail was dismissed by Annexure-1. The petitioner has renewed the present prayer without approaching the lower court. The last rejection order was passed by the Additional Sessions Judge- Ist,Siwan on 16.5.2007. It is true that the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has informed to this Court that three witnesses have been examined so far during the trial but the court still fells itself indicated by not getting many information as to what could be the reasons on the slow pace of trial and further as to what steps the court has initiated for production of the witnesses and what impediments its facing in that direction. If the petitioner approaches the lower court which I believe it could be the learned Judge of the case which arises out of Siwan Mufassil P.S.Case No.161 of 2005, it is expected that the - 2 - learned Judge should mention all above things in his order showing the court an overall satisfactory view as regards the trial. Petition is dismissed with the above directions with the liberties lies that the petitioner approach the court thereafter. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )