In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan At Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R In S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.7301/06 Smt. Rudi Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan Date Of Order :: 23rd November, 2006 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jitendra Ray Goyal Mr. Hanuman Chaudhary, counsel for petitioner. Mr. R.P. Kuldeep, Public Prosecutor for State. .................... Heard learned counsel for accused petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State, perused the case diary and other material produced during the course of arguments. It is contended on behalf of the accused petitioner that she was compelled to enter into an agreement to sell her land with the complainant and she was urgently needed the money for treatment of her husband. It is also submitted that when the complainant did not pay the sale amount then only she sold her land to another person because she not only required the money for the treatment of her husband who ultimately died due to cancer disease but also she received a notice from Sikar Sahkari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Limited for repaying the amount of Rs.7,00,000/-. It is also submitted that the accused petitioner has not committed any offence and at the most it may be a case of civil nature which has been converted into criminal litigation. It is also submitted that the accused petitioner is an old illetrate woman and she has been falsely implicated just to create pressure and harassment on her. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. Without making any observation on merits, having considered the rival submissions made at the bar, nature of accusation, material on record and the entire facts circumstances, I deem it proper to grant the benefit of pre- arrest bail to accused petitioner Smt. Rudi Devi. In the result, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Smt. Rudi Devi W/o. Mangla Ram, she shall be released on bail by the concerned SHO/Investigating Officer in FIR No.231/2006 registered at Police Station Reengus provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- together with two sureties each in the sum of Rs.5,000/- to the satisfaction of the concerned SHO/Investigating Officer on the following conditions :- 1. that she shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; 2. that she shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer; and 3. that she shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (J.R. Goyal),J VS Shekhawat/- Jr. P.A.