1 wp3505.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.3505 OF 2011 Tukaram Jaba Wadekar : Petitioner V/s. The Collector of Pune & Ors. : Respondents .... Mr.Sanjeev A. Savant for the petitioner. Mr.V.S.Gokhale, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the respondents. ... CORAM : D.D. SINHA & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 29, 2011. P.C.: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. At the outset, the counsel for the petitioner has brought to our notice the order dated 3.5.2011 passed by this Court which reads thus:- “The grievance in this petition is about the delay on the part of the respondent authorities in not allotting the alternate land in lieu of the petitioner’s land acquired for public project i.e. Chaskaman Project inspite of allotment letter 2 wp3505.11 having been issued as far as back in September, 1989. The petitioner has therefore, made last representation dated 15th March, 2011 at Exhibit-H attached to this petition. While adjoining the hearing of this petition to 4th July, 2011, we direct the respondent No.1 Collector of Pune to decide the petitioner’s representation dated 15th March, 2011 at Exhibit-H attached to this petition by 30th June, 2011.”. It is submitted that in spite of the directions of this Court, the representation of the petitioner has not been decided by the Collector till this date. 3. The learned Asstt. Govt. Pleader states that for want of instructions, he is unable to assist the Court whether the representation of the petitioner has been decided or not. 4. Be that as it may, we have already directed the Collector vide our order dated 3.5.2011 to decide the petitioner’s representation dated 15.3.2011 by 30.6.2011. If the same is not decided till this time, we grant 3 wp3505.11 further time of two weeks to the Collector to take a decision, in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard. It is made clear that no further time for this purpose shall be granted to the Collector. The Collector is further directed to communicate the order to the petitioner. 5. With these observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (D. D. SINHA, J.) (R.Y. GANOO,J.)