IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47725 of 2008 1. SUMITRA DEVI 2. MITHILESH KUMAR @ MITHILESH PRASAD 3. REKHA DEVI 4. NEETU KUMAR @ NEETU KUMARI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RINKU DEVI ----------- 2/ 28/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State as also for O.P. No.2 who has appeared suo motu. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a complaint case under Sections- 498A and 406 of I.P.C. and 3/4 of D.P. Act. It is not in controversy between the parties that the husband is already in custody. The petitioners are the family members with generalized allegations and nothing heinous. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Complaint Case No.505/08, Tr. No.1548/08. - 2 - The submission of O.P. No.2 for possible matrimonial harmony is a matter to be appropriately kept in mind by the Magistrate concerned during trial. Before enlarging the petitioners on bail, the Magistrate concerned shall re-confirm the husband being in custody and only in that event this order shall be given effect to. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )