IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35965 of 2011 Arbind Sah Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 11-11-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in the light of order dated 15.04.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 386 of 2011 in Khagaria P.S. case No. 118 of 2010. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that this Court has observed in the aforesaid order dated 15.04.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 386 of 2011 that trial of the petitioner should be concluded within nine months from the date of commitment of the case but uptill now, the trial of the petitioner is pending whereas the case of the petitioner was committed to the court of sessions on 26.11.2010. It appears to me that the learned counsel for the petitioner misunderstood the order dated 15.04.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 386 of 2011 because in the aforesaid order, it has already been noted down that the trial of the petitioner would be concluded within nine months form the date of receipt of the order if his case has already been committed to the Court of Sessions and admittedly, the case of this petition has already been committed to the court of sessions before passing the order dated 15.04.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 386 of 2 2011. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed being premature. A.K. Vishwakarma/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)