bsb : 1 : IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2382 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 2382 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 2382 OF 2007 ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2148 OF 2001 APPLICATION NO. 2148 OF 2001 APPLICATION NO. 2148 OF 2001 ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2383 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 2383 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 2383 OF 2007 ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2384 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 2384 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 2384 OF 2007 AND AND AND CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2972 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 2972 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 2972 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 5693 OF 2000 PETITION NO. 5693 OF 2000 PETITION NO. 5693 OF 2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda ¦ Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s ¦ Orders Order or Directions and ¦ Registrar’s Orders ¦ ------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.B.D.Joshi i/by Ms.G.K.Jadhav for the petitioner. Mr.P.N.Joshi for the respondent No.1 and for the applicant in C.A. Nos. 2148/2001 and 2384/2007. Ms.Bharati Patil for the Resp.No.2. Ms.Lata Desai for Respondent Nos.3, 6, 10 and 24. Mr.V.P.Malvankar, A.G.P. for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND J.N.PATEL AND J.N.PATEL AND SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. MHATRE, JJ. MHATRE, JJ. DATED: DATED: DATED: 22ND FEBRUARY, 2008. 22ND FEBRUARY, 2008. 22ND FEBRUARY, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard. bsb : 2 : 2. Insofar as payment of wages is concerned, the learned counsel appearing for the Board states that the services of 26 workers involved in the petition will be released from the month of October 2007 till February 2008 and the wages of the 18 workers which is in dispute and who have actually worked will also be disbursed subject to the result of the petition. We accept this statement insofar as it relates to merits of the petition. 3. We therefore direct that the matter to be reconsidered by the Board in the light of change in circumstances so that engagement of Mapari workers can be regulated as per the Scheme or if they did not agree to this proposal, this Court would hear the matter on merits and finally dispose of the petition. 4. It appears that the parties are not interested in getting the matter resolved by the Board. Petition be bsb : 3 : listed for final hearing in due course and with a direction to the Board to disburse the amount in accordance with the interim order passed by this Court, which are in force, as regards engaging of Mapari workers. We further add that in case any contingency arises and the A.P.M.C. requires additional hands, they would approach the Board for allotting them additional workers and on such request being made, the Board would take a decision and provide them additional Mapari workers as per the Scheme. 5. Insofar as the additional 18 workers engaged by the A.P.M.C. are concerned who have been engaged on their own without approval of the Board, their wages shall be paid by the A.P.M.C. at their own risk and consequences. 6. All the civil applications disposed of accordingly. bsb : 4 : (J.N.PATEL, (J.N.PATEL, (J.N.PATEL, J.) J.) J.) (SMT.NISHITA (SMT.NISHITA (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) MHATRE, J.) MHATRE, J.)