1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 98 OF 2008 Mr Nilesh Laxman More .. Petitioner Vs Mrs Dipa Nilesh More .. Respondent Mr. K.R.Yelwe i/b K.Basu Rajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. Aarti P Bhide, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 20/07/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this writ petition, the petitioner has impugned an order dated 15.10.2007 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Pune, allowing the application filed by the respondent-wife bearing Interim Application No.174 of 2006. By that application, the respondent-wife prayed for maintenance for herself and for her minor daughter. The Family Court has directed the petitioner to pay Rs.2000/- per month to the respondent-wife and Rs.2000/- per month to the minor daughter by way of interim maintenance from the date of the application, i.e. 30.10.2006. Mr.Yelwe, learned counsel for the petitioner, has placed on record a salary certificate issued by his employer T 2 showing the gross salary of Rs.8980/-, out of which, according to the petitioner, Rs.3435/- are deducted towards GPF, REF, Society etc and the total take-home salary is Rs.5545/-. In view thereof, he submits that it is not possible for the petitioner to spare Rs. 4000/- per month for maintenance to the respondent-wife and to the minor daughter. Insofar as the deductions are concerned, it appears that the substantial amount has been deducted towards loan taken by the petitioner after the application for maintenance filed by the respondent-wife. Keeping that in view and considering overall facts and circumstances of the case, in my opinion, no case for interference in this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is made out. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)