1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7550 OF 2009 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.M.S.Karnik for the petitioner None for the respondent CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : OCTOBER 9,2009 P.C.: 1 Apart from the fact that the order impugned is purely interlocutory in nature, the first respondent-original plaintiff has exercised an option under Rule 3 of Order XVIII of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 and has taken the risk of leading evidence by way rebuttal. That is the observation made by the trial court. The effect of the impugned order is that the first respondent will not be entitled to adduce evidence at this stage, but he has chosen to adduce the evidence in rebuttal. No case for interference is made out. Hence, writ petition is rejected. JUDGE