// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT PRINCIPAL SEAT, JODHPUR ORDER In S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.2623/2009 {Dhirendra Versus State of Rajasthan} Date of Order ::: 28th July, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Shri K.R. Bhati, counsel for the petitioner Shri Anil Joshi, PP for the State of Rajasthan #### By the Court: Heard learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that co-accused Subhash, against whom one another case was pending, has been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court on 5th June, 2009 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 2927/2009, therefore, petitioner be also released on bail. Learned PP opposed the bail application and contended that this is a case, wherein FIR was registered under Section 379 and 411 IPC; the petitioner is habitual offender; from the order of Sessions Judge, Bhilwara, it is clear that three other cases are pending against the petitioner of similar // 2 // nature, whereas one case against co-accused Subhash was not pending for the similar nature, but it was pending for the offence under Section 498 A and 406 IPC and in these circumstances, the case of petitioner cannot be equated with the case of co-accused. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and the reasons assigned by the Sessions Judge, Bhilwara while rejecting the bail application of the petitioner, I am not inclined to allow this application and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. //DK//