:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.189 OF 200 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.189 OF 200 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.189 OF 2008 WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.227 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.227 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.227 OF 2008 Akram B. Khan & Anr. ...Appellants. v. Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai ...Respondent. Mr.Anil Singh for Shri Dhananjay R. Singh , advs. for the Appellants. Mrs.Geeta Joglekar , adv. for the Respondent/BMC. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 28th February, 2008. DATE: 28th February, 2008. DATE: 28th February, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Parties. 2. The defendant/respondent Municipal Corporation had issued notice under Section 351 for demolition of unauthorised construction and that notice was challenged by the plaintiff/appellant in L.C.Suit No.294 of 2008. The plaintiff took out the notice of motion seeking interim relief against the impugned notice. However, the trial Court refused ad-interim relief. Against that, the present appeal is filed. Admittedly, notice of motion is still pending. The impugned notice is pertaining to two structures, which are in existence since 1995 or prior to that. The Municipal Corporation has yet to file reply about the same. Therefore, with :2: consent of the learned counsel for both the Parties, appeal stands disposed off with the following directions: i. The respondent/Corporation shall file reply to the notice of motion within three weeks from this day and the trial Court shall hear and dispose off the notice of motion within three weeks thereafter. Parties shall maintain status-quo till disposal of the notice of motion. 3. As the appeal itself is disposed off, civil application does not survive and stands disposed off accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)