,iV. l(^- HIGH COURT OS* CHHATTISGARH AT BILA^tS vs "i Wft •af'Tfi/f.fu'm »w»• • AW^u'o •~tr»i»• iu'.j ,^^i'^^^» PETITIONBR Upendra Kumar S/o. Narayan Prasad, aged about 28 yeara, Resident of ViUage TUdega, TahsU Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (MP) Vs. RESPONDEMTS 1. The Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilasliur (MF^ 2. The Sub Dkivisional Magistrate, Patha^aon Division, Jaspur (MP). 3. Tahsildar, Pafha^aon, District Jashpur Nagar (MP) 4. State of M.P. through Secretaiy, Department of Heallh & Faauly Welfare, VaUabh Bhawaa, Bhopal (MI^ i WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLB 226/227 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. AfftUiotrt, J.) Present: Shri B.D.Guru, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Paael Lawyerfor tfae State. O RD B R (Passed on this 16tu day of Octoba-, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appeariag for fhc petitioner submits that with the pass^e of tiaae, the petition has becoiae iniructuous. 2. Leamed couasel appeBnng for the State/respondents has no objection to the above subnaission. 3. In VIEW ot the above, the writ petition is dismisscd, as haviug becoine infi-uctuous. / ^. . sdf- sat'shK.Agn;hotr, Judge