-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.430 OF 2007 APPEAL NO.430 OF 2007 APPEAL NO.430 OF 2007 Laxman Narhar Vibhute & Ors. ...Appellants vs. Rajendra Maruti Deshmukh & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.V.S.Talkute for the Appellants Mr.N.N.Bhandrashete for Respondent Nos.1 to 7 CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : JANUARY 30, 2008. : JANUARY 30, 2008. : JANUARY 30, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Advocate for the Appellants who are the original plaintiffs. The submission is that the contents of the gift deed cannot be treated as proved even after applying presumption under section 79 of the Indian Evidence Act,1872. 2. The courts below have recorded concurrent findings of fact that the appellants-plaintiffs have failed to prove their ownership over the suit property. That is the reason why the suit filed by the Appellants has been dismissed. I find no error in said concurrent finding. A certified copy of a 30 year old gift deed was placed on record of the suit. No substantial question of law arises. Second Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE