@ PETiTiONER : Smt. Basanti Soni $/o Late Shri Shrawan Soni, aged about 55 years, Rio Sonarpara, Mungeii Dist; Bi!aspur(C.G.) \IEDQI IQ OUQ RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantraiay Ralpur (C G) 2. Du: net Education O‘fcer Briaepur Distt Bilae ur (C G) WRIT PETITrcN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUITON OF iNDlA SB: Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. H!GH COL} TQFC ATT!$GARH B! A PUR WPJT PETlTlON (S) No. 2?04 of 2009 Present Shri Somkant Verma Advocate fer the petitioner Shri Y.S.Thakur, Dep=uty Advocate Genera! for the State/respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 24‘3ay of June, 2009) Heard. '1. The husband of the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teachers on a fixed pay of Rs. 100A After oompietion of his probation period, he was granted reguiar pay scaie. 2. L‘earned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue invoiveo‘ in the case is asto whether, the petitioner is entitied to reguiar pay scaie wef. the date of initiai appointment or after compietion of probation period. x 1/ 3. The issue invoived, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunai, Jabaipur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. 8: others), wherein it was held that the simiiariy situated teachersare entitled to reguiar pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matterwas taken up to Hon'ble $uprerne Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892193. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon‘bie Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the TeacherslAssistant Teachers are entitled to regutar pay scale from date of initial appointment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitloner also submits that this court, while considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & others Vs. State of Chhattlsgarh & others {WE (S) No. 4?25/20G63 by order dated 01 ‘092006, allowed the petitioners to make a representation along with copy of the petition and annexures within a period of ten days, raising aii their grievances and in turn the concerned respondent was directed to decide the representation in an obiective manner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the representation. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation raising all her grievances and in turn; the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, it any, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date o? receipt of the representation, subiect to verification of the facts. 6. in View of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- r Satish K. Agnihotri Judge