IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34685 of 2008 RAVINDRA KUMAR @ RAVINDRA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.9.2008 Heard. Allegation against the petitioner is that for certain dispute regarding share in land he had quarrel in the morning and at about 9 A.M. he came back to his house, dragged out Saroj Devi by her hair, pulled out a pistol from his possession and shot her dead. The contention is that it could be a case of property dispute and that the petitioner might be infuriated on account of being denied his real share in the property and as a result of which the petitioner had committed the murder. I do not want to express any opinion on the contention because that could be the defence of the petitioner which could be scrutinized in the light of the provision of section 105 of the Evidence Act and could be answered properly under the facts and circumstances of the case which could be appeaing through the evidence of the witnesses. Considering the allegation that the petitioner being the assailant of the deceasd, I am not inclined to direct release of the petitioner on bail. The petition is dismissed. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )