IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4166 of 2008 KAILASH CHANDRA YADAV S/O SRI BANDELAL YADAV, R/O SAINITOLA P.S.-SIMRI BAKTIYARPUR, DISTRICT- SAHARSA. …………….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE COLLECTOR SAHARSA. 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (NIYOGAN) AWAR PRADESHIK NIYOJANALAYA SAHARSA. 4. THE S.D.O., SIMRI BAKTIYARPUR SUB-DIVISION DISTRICT SAHARSA. …………..Respondents FOR THE PETITIONER :Mr. Ibrahim Kabir, Adv. FOR THE STATE : Mr. Satish Kr. Sinha, A.C. to S.C.-1 ----------------------- 03 20.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner has applied against advertisement issued in the year 2006. The prayer of the petitioner is that the District Magistrate and the other authorities should consider his application. It is obvious that if a person applies against an advertisement, his application will be judged according to the criteria laid down in the advertisement. No order or direction can be passed by this Court, that the case of the petitioner should be considered, else this Court will be burdened with cases each time an advertisement is issued wherein all the candidates who have applied against the advertisement would ask for a direction from this Court, that their case ought to be considered which would lead to chaos. This application is thus dismissed. Safik (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)