IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13272 of 2008 1. SULEKHA DEVI WIFE OF VIJAY MAHTO 2. VIJAY MAHTO SON OF SARJUG MAHTO BOTH R/O- VILLAGE SARAULI, P.S.BIBHUTIPUR, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. NARESH MAHTO, SON OF RAM CHANDRA MAHTO R/O- VILLAGE JAMALDIPUR, P.S.- MANSUR CHAK, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI. For the petitioners : Mr. Ram Narayan Mahto, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP. ----------- 2 16.11.2010 Petitioners approached this Court for quashing the First Information Report which was registered on 5.8.2005. It is the stand of the petitioner that the same is based on contradictory and got up allegations. I am afraid that lodgment of an F.I.R. can be interfered with invoking the inherent jurisdiction of this Court on the stated grounds. Secondly, lodgment of F.I.R. would give rise to investigation only where the veracity of the allegation shall be tested. . The application lacks merit. It is accordingly dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )