IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No.1057 of 2009 Date of Decision.30.08.2011 Subhash Dahiya son of Sh. Budh Ram r/o House No.380/21, Sukhpura (near Hafed Feed Plant) Rohtak, presently working as Junior Field Investigator in the office of District Statistical Officer, Economic and Statistic Analysis Department, Rohtak .....Petitioner Versus Sh. Rajinder Kumar Bishnoi, Economic & Statistical Advisor to Government of Haryana, Sector 17, Chandigarh .....Contemnor Present: Ms. Rajwinder Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Tajinder Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Goripuria, Addl. A.G., Haryana. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. At the previous hearing on 19.08.2011, learned counsel for the petitioner was directed to take instructions from the petitioner in response to a plea on behalf of the State that order had been fully complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has still no instructions. I would proceed to dispose of the writ petition as infructuous, taking note of the contentions made on behalf of the State. 2. The petition is disposed of. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 30, 2011 Pankaj*