HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Review PaiTion No.39 of 2009 1. Sfafe Gov‘r. of Chhaf‘risgarh, Through Secrefary, Educa‘h’on Depar‘rmenf, D.K.5. Bhawan - Raipur (C.G.) 2. Disfricf Educa‘h‘on Officer, Bilaspur, Disfricf Bilaspur (C.6.) 3. Block EducaTion Officer, Block - Bilha, Dis’rr‘icf Bilaspur (C.6.) Vs Sm‘r. Ujjawala Chandra, Aged about 42 year's, W/o — Shri Ni’rish Kumar Chandra, Gov’r. Boy, Primary Sarkanda, Bilaspur', Disfr‘ict Bilaspur' (C.G.) O R D E R (In chamber) (Passed on Jg.6.2009) Dhirendra Mishra J: 1. The appellan’r-S‘rm‘e and i’rs officers have filed fhis applicafion and prayed for'review of ‘rhe order do‘red 6.2.2009 paSSed by ’rhis Cour? in W.P. (s) No.220/O9. Appeilan’rs have also preferred an applica‘rion for condonafion of delay as The review pe‘ri‘rion has been preferred wi’rh a delay of 31 days. 2. For ’rhe reasons indica‘red in The applicafion dafed 08.04.2009 for condonm‘ion of deiay, which is also suppor’red by The affidavi’r of Shri B.L. Kurre, D.E.O., Bilaspur, The applicafion for condona’rion of delay is aliowed and delay is condoned. 3. If is seled Iaw fhaf The High CourT exercises power of review as a CourT of plenary jurisdicTion To prevenT mismrriage of‘jusTice or To correcT grave and palpable errors commiTTed by iT. There are no definiTive limiTs To The exercise of The powers of review. The power of review may be exercised on The discovery of new and imporTanT maffer or evidence which, afTer The exercise of due diligence, was noT wiThin The knowledge of The person seeking The review or could noT be produced by him aT The Time when The order was made. IT may be exercised where some misTake or error apparenT on The face of The record is found. However, The pOWer is To be exercised wiThin The Uglwwmins ‘ APPELLANTS RESPONDENTS S ff limifah‘ons as provided under Sech’on 114 read with Order 47 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. No.220/09, if is evidenf ‘rhaT affer hearing counsel for The pefifioner as we“ as The respondems/Sfm‘e in defai} The wrif pefifion was allowed, subjecf fa all verificm‘ions regarding The facts pleaded in fhe pelifion. Various circulars issued by lhe Sfafe from ‘rime to lime referred To in This applicm‘ion, were also broughT To The noTice of This CourT aT The Time of argumen‘r as is evidenT from reading of The order under review. In The considered opinion of This CourT, no any ground as menTioned in The review peTiTion is available To The appellanT~STaTe for review of The order daTed 6.2.2009. . Accordingly, The insTanT review peTiTion being wiThouT any subsTance , deserves To be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. édl ’ . ga . yend:3 MKS)“ 9X“ wage \. (WWWM . From perusal of The order under review and original record of W.P. (s)