IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5730 of 2011 SUBODH SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. Petitioner is named accused in this case being husband of the complainant carries general allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. At the fag end of the complaint petition, there is allegation of seeking marriage without any specific details which has been denied with an offer to continue marital life with the complainant who is only wife of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation, in the event the petitioner filing an application before the competent court under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act and submitting proof of such filing and in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks, let petitioner, namely, Subodh Sah, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali, Hajipur, in connection with Complaint Case No. 3513/2008 (Tr. No. 2889/2010). Subject to condition under section 438(2) of 2 the Code of Criminal Procedure and additional condition to attend the court regularly in both the cases at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, and in the event of failure on three consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)