IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34816 of 2008 LEKHA NAND JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 24.2.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is husband. His prayer was earlier rejected though at that stage. It appears that to get the relief on the point of non-conclusion of the trial, the petitioner did not appear in court as it reveals from the report of the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.IV, Supaul. So no liberty on this point can be given to the petitioner. He is directed to accommodate the court. At the present, the petitioner is also not entitled for bail. The prayer for bail is rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI