IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No. 323 of 2005 In Letters Patent Appeal (Stamp) No. 27344 of 2005 In Writ Petition No. 1626 of 2005 Shri Somjai, Janai, Kalkai Devasthan Trust, Morgiri, Raigad .. Applicant V/s. Dagdu alias Dattaram G. Bhamne & Ors. .. Respondents Ms. Gauri Jadhav for the Applicant Mr. A.M. Kulkarni for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 9 Mr. A.R. Patil, AGP. for the Respondent Nos. 10 and 11 CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED : 20.12.2005. DATED : 20.12.2005. DATED : 20.12.2005. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant, the learned counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 9 and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the Respondent Nos. 10 and 11. 2. By this Civil Application, the Applicant is seeking condonation of two day’s delay. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide, hence the Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Place the Letters Patent Appeal on Board for admission on 12.1.2006. (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)