IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 27TH JUNE 2011 / 6TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 12699 of 2011(J) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SAILENDRAN NAIR, S/O.SURENDRAN PILLAI, "SREESAILAM", MAVILA, AUGUSTHYACODU MURI, ANCHAL VILLAGE, AREEPLACHI. P.O., PATHANAPURAM TALUK, REP. BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY AJITHA S.NAIR, W/O.SAILENDRAN NAIR, -DO- BY ADV. SRI.R.ARUN RAJ, SRI.R.KRISHNAKUMAR (CHERTHALA). RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. ANCHAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH [SPECIAL GRADE], REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH OFFICE, ANCHAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT, 691 306. 2. THE SECRETARY, ANCHAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH [SPECIAL GRADE], PANCHAYATH OFFICE, ANCHAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT, 691 306. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.R.S.KALKURA, SRI.M.S.KALESH, SRI.HARISH GOPINATH, SRI.V.VINAY MENON, SRI.M.AJAY (IRUMPANAM). THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/06/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 12699 of 2011(J) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 13/07/2010 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ANCHAL TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE BUILDING TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 02/03/2009. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE RECEIPT EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF FEE DATED 06/08/2010 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE RECEIPT EVIDENCING ACCEPTANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DATED 06/08/2010. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 24/08/2010. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO.12699 OF 2011 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of June, 2011 JUDGMENT It is alleging inaction on the part of the respondents in considering the application for building permit that this Writ Petition has been filed. The petitioner is the owner in absolute possession of 19.43 Ares of land comprised in Sy.Nos.234/5 and 234/12 of Anchal village. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that even till today, the respondents have not considered the said application and passed appropriate orders thereon. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. Taking into account the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the application submitted by the petitioner on 6.8.2010 is still pending consideration before the second respondent, this Writ Petition is disposed of as hereunder, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions raised in this Writ Petition. The second respondent shall consider and pass orders on the application dated 6.8.2010 for building permit, if received and pending consideration, W.P.(C) NO.12699/2011 2 expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment . (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) NO.12699/2011 3 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. JUDGMENT September, 2010