HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR DIVISIONBENCH CORAM : HON'BLE^HRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ. & HQN'BI..ESBHRI D.R. DESHfiflUKH; J. Misc. Appeal N0. 1115 OF2005 Aopellant Claimant RESPONDENTS Non-Claimants MayaramChaturvedi,agedabout29 years, S/oShriSadaFam Chatorvedi, Occupation - Agriculturist, R/o Village Sundarvan, Police StaUon -Patari, Tahsil - Balodabazar, District- Raipur (C.G.) Vs. 1. Uttam Kumar Janghel aged about 25 years, S/o Shri Kunvrarsingh Janghel, ppeupaeon Drivsr <rf^ Swaraj h4aj<la, R/o Palradi, Lodhipara, Near Janghel Health Club, PQlice Stsition - Gudhiyari City, Tahsil &Dist.-Raipur (C.G.) 2. Ketan Gandhi, aged about 35 years, S/o Late Mohanlal Gandhi, Occupation Registered owner of Swanaj Majda, R/o - Gydhiyari, irrfront of Padava Hanuman Mandir, Poljce Station—Gudhiyari, City, Tahsil & Dist-Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Through Dhflsional Manager, Divisional Offlce, Kutchery Chowk, Raipur,District- Raipur (C.G.) Present: Mr. Shivenau Pand^, learned counsel for the appellant. / ORALORDER (Pass8dwi3rdJanuaryi2006) ^' . "•1 • ' ' ' / • The tollowing orderoftheCourtwas passed by S.R.NAYAK.CJ. - Iri a personal injury cEse, the appellantnot being safisfied witti the compensatjon awardecfcby ttie M^IT. has preferred thfe appeal for more - 3-' .^- ! iBI;!! ^1 .::iSitKa^S:^S i^l^^^^i compensation. It was contended by leamed counsel for the appellantthat due to accident, the appellant has sustaihed grievous physicaf injuries resulting in permanent impafrmentof his body andtherefore, he could not carry on his normal avocatlon and therefore, what Is awarded by the MACT is totally inadequate and unreasonable and requires to be enhanced. We do not find any merit in the above contention. AIUiough, that is the claim of the appellant, the fact remains that the appellant has not examined Uie doctor nor has he produced wound certificate or disability certificate. In the absence of medicalevidence to show that ttie appellant has sustained any permanent disabitity, the Tribunal has awarded compensation towards pain and suflering and the actuaf ecpenditure mcurred by nimtovrardslreatment. We do not find any merit intheappeal and it is accorelingly^dish'iissect. There shall be noorder as to m: ' '•-• ' : ' .: ! costs. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh- Judge / 'v w^a