IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2075 of 2006 (O&M) Date of decision: January 15, 2009 Ramesh Bajaj .. Petitioner v. Paramjeet and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Kumar Jain, Advocate for respondent No. 1. .. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 28.3.2006, passed by the learned court below, whereby paragraphs 4 to 6 of the affidavits of the proposed witnesses were permitted to be struck off being beyond pleadings. The reason therefor was that on an earlier occasion, the suit was compromised between the parties. Later on, Paramjeet Singh, one of the party, backed out from the compromise and in paragraphs 4 to 6, the facts regarding compromise had been stated. In view of the fact that there was no pleading in the suit regarding compromise, the statement made in the affidavits furnished in evidence was permitted to be deleted by the learned court below. The petition filed is totally misconceived, considering the fact that on an earlier occasion, the dispute was compromised while filing the compromise deed in the court itself and everything is on the record of the court itself. To whatever effect the same was, whether that is part of the affidavit or not was to be seen by the court at the time of final disposal of the suit. In fact, the petitioner- defendant in the suit was out to delay the disposal thereof which is pending since July, 1997. In view of the above, I do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 15.1.2009 mk