HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition {Q\ No. 738 of 2008 Petltioners 1. 2. 3. 4. Sukaiu © Jumman Satnamj, S/0 Late Pusau Ram, Aged about 58 yoars, R/o Village Tarighat, P.S. Rajsm, Distrlct Raipur (CG) Ghusu Ram, S/o Lage Jaggu Ram, Aged about 54 years, R/o VilSage Tarighat, P.S. Rajim, District Raipur (CG) Chatur Ram. S/o Shri Kartik Ram, Aged about 48 years, R/o Vsdage Tarighat, P.S. Rajim, District Raipur (CG) Smt. Phoolu Bas Gond, W/o Late Pusau Ram. D/o Shri Thanwar. Aged about 56 years, R/o VilJage Tarighat, P.S. Rajlm, DlsSncS Ralpur (CQ) Vorsus Respondente 1, Stete of Chhattjsgarh, Through the Secretapy, PubSic Works Department. Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) EngJnQer-in-ChiQf, Pubiic Works Department, Raipur (CG) Executive Engineer, PubSic Works Department, Raipur (CG) Sub-DlvtsJonsl Officer. PybSic Works Department, Sub-DivSslon Rajim Raipur (C.G) 2. 3. 4. WRST PETSTOSN UNDER ARTSCLE 225 OF THE CONSTiTUTJON OF JNDIA Stngle Bench : Hon'bSe Mr. Satish K. Agnlhotri, J. Shri R. K. Pa'ii, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shrl A. S. Kachwaha, Deputy AcSvocate Genera! for the respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on this 4th day of February, 2008} Learned counse? appearing for the petitioners submsts that the authoritses concerned are considersng the cases of onSy those emptoyses, 'A'ho have approsched this Court for grant of reSief. The order dat©d4th January, 2007 passed by this Court in W.P No. 108 of 2005 (Govind Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & othsrs) and other connected matters, s's applicabte to aSi the empSoyees, who are slmjiari*/ sttuated, 1. 4. Thakur •rL- jrrespective of the fact whether the sjmilariy situated empioyees have approached thss Court or not. Thus, the rsspondents are directed to consider the representatjons of the employees, who are stmiIarSy situated, jn ths light of the judgment and order passed in the matter of Govind Vs. SSate of Chhattisgarh & others (supra). after verifyjng ths facts. Learned counsel appearing for the petitionsr submjts that the petitioner wilj make a representatlon within a period ofseven days. In view of the above, thls petstion stands dssposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge