IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24310 of 2011 Murlidhar Sahni Versus The State Of Bihar ***** 03. 19.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 61/2011 for offences under Sections 304(B)/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, is one of the named accused in this case being Bhaisur of the deceased daughter of the informant who died within 6 to 7 years of her marriage under some suspicious circumstances after suffering from torture for dowry etc. Submission is that in fact she died of illness and there is nothing specific attributed against the petitioner, though, general and omnibus allegation. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor with the help of case diary, up to paragraph 77 dated 23/06/2011, tried to submit that some of the witnesses have said about putting pressure of second marriage upon husband of the deceased. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah (West Champaran) in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 61/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for three years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)