IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36410 of 2010 ARVIND YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 3 09.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is not named in the FIR but during course of investigation, the name of this petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused, Ranjan Kumar and, thereafter, sister of deceased disclosed this fact that the petitioner used to visit the house of deceased. The petitioner had illicit relationship with the wife of the deceased. Furthermore, the aforesaid, Ranjan Kumar as well as sister of deceased disclosed that this petitioner committed murder of deceased. Except the aforesaid materials, i.e. confessional statement of co-accused, there is nothing against the petitioner. Moreover, having similar allegation, Ranjan Kumar @ Ranjan Kamkar and Veena Devi @ Veena Devi have already been granted privilege of bail. Considering the above facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, the petitioner, namely, Arvind Yadav is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Dinara P. S. Case No. 69 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas at Sasaram. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)