1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1178 OF 2011 (Mahadeo Damadu Patil and others vs. Smt. Shantabai Ramchandra Gaikwad and another) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri T.B. Pantawane, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri R.D. Murkute, Advocate for the respondents. -------- CORAM : R.M. SAVANT, J. DATED : JUNE 23, 2011 The application (Exh. 34/C) for exhibiting documents including the Partition Deed came to be rejected by the impugned order dated 19/1/2011 passed by the trial Court. The trial Court has refused to exhibit the Partition Deed as the same was not registered. The trial Court has recorded a finding that in terms of the said document, one Mahadeo Patil is in possession of 8½ acres of land and one Dagdu Patil, who had a share of 4 acres of land in the said partition, has 2 willed away the said 4 acres in the name of the son of the witness. The trial Court was, therefore, of the view that in view of the devolution of interest in the immovable property, which has taken place by virtue of the said partition, the same was compulsorily registrable under Section 17 of the Registration Act. In my view, the reasons mentioned by the trial Court for non-exhibiting the Partition Deed cannot be faulted with. No case for interference is made out. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE khj