IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28645 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.05.2011 Kulwinder Singh @ Preet and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. APS Deol, Sr. Advocate, with Ms. Rimplejeet Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, Addl. A.G., Punjab. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Present petition is filed seeking regular bail in case FIR No.68 dated 26.7.2010 under Sections 22/61/85 NDPS Act, Police Section Badhni Kalan, District Moga. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, has very fairly stated that petitioner No.1 is the partner of M/s Preet Medical Store and is having licence under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, whereas petitioner No.2 is an employee. He has further stated that as per the report, petitioners cannot be said in possession of any contraband under the NDPS Act. Considering the statement of learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, petition is allowed. Let petitioners be released on bail to the satisfaction of learned trial Court. (Alok Singh) Judge May 04, 2011 R.S.