f$ 13/37/ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH CGURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIAESE’EJR WRIT PETETIGN (S} NO. 2E1\3 OF ZG$9 PETETEONER :— /Jitendra Shrivastava s/ o Shri Bhagwat Prasad Shrivastava, aged about 45' years, R/o Ramnagar, Ward N0. 15, Dourldilohara, District Durg (C.G.). VER§EIS RES?GNDENTS State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development D.K.$'. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.‘;. 2. Commissioner, Urban Administration and Deveiopment, Raipur (08.). Joint Director, Urban Administratien and Development, Raipur (C.G.). 4. Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Doundilohara, District Durg [f \S.u.). F \ w’” WRET PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTEON OF ENEIA , HIGH CGUR‘F GF‘ CHHATTI$$§RI§ AT BELASPUR $3 : HON‘3LE $HRI JQSTECE PMTH‘EKER D3W‘kKE'BR WJWS} MG. 2719(2CEQ9 PETITEGNER Jimildra Shrivastava Versus ‘RE3?€)E\¥DEE§TS Stair: {21" C).(3r. 8r. Omar?) INDIA Agyeaxance: Shii Manish Upadhyay, counwi for the. petitkmér. Shri N.Naha Ray, RL. fer the Sta’mi r€sps.‘1 to 3 Shri B.Duguru, counwl for resp. Nd4‘ eRAL GREEK 1194mm): 1; Griezvammi 0f tha patitiomir in tha prwsnt petition is: that though 316 has worktsd for mom man 3.0 yaars (as daily wage Empkzwe' prior t0 31.12.97 but tin data ha has not beea i‘egulan'zed 1*)y thei regp. N04. According to the petitimaer, but for mjzmr tecimicalitifjzsi fjm yetijioner has a g0od case. and hg might to havs baén reguiaiizaai takmg sympathaic View in his faveur. S‘m‘i Ugaadhyay submits thafrexceapt tim pai‘kiovafcr .911 (Aha wampbysias whc haw workmi for more 'than 10 yEaIs with the 1135p. No.4 ham: ham regu'jan'md. He. submim that the purposa 01f f1ling this yetitéori wouid b4: smvad if for the tims b§ing Qm yetitiormr is permittad to m3 mpressamaiian baforé tthe. msp. N03 and in tum. thi: Tasp. \03 b6 dirtiemd to consider the case of th€ p€titi0n€r afl'ésh within soma siipuiatad pr’m'od. Counsd aypaarfmg for the rwpamknts have n0 Ghjection if mt: petifionaar make3 arly iivish mpmwa‘iation befare iha rasp. N03 However t‘zwv submit that thr: same weuld ha (iticinisd in acconiaimcr: with law considwing 3}} the points which have been raismi by ma patitiona‘ and the. raspomitnts before. fhie3 Court. WK patition if; according‘iy rliSposed of parmittimg the patiiimaer to {319. appropxiate ragmisentation befbré 111$ rasp. No.3. Naadless to state thai if any such mpreseniat‘bn i3 mada Tim e. with kaw cormkicring all thii sama wouid b6 (isci&ed 'm. accordaxmc aspects, of thé case. it is mack char that This $03311: has not axprwsad emy Opimml aSs 311d ths aufhoyity cancsmfzd Wamd ha g? liberty to (iscide the mpmssmation smctly 'm accord ameg wiih law. Sdl— ‘Pritinker Diwaker‘f " Judge f . i l on tha merLts of ’rhe c Aup»A