WP(C) 7086/2004 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE H.N.SARMA Heard Mr. P.J. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner and al so Mr. V.M. Thomas, learned standing counsel for the Education Department. 2. Although the petitioner in the instant case has claimed for pro vincialisation of her service as lecturer in Tamulichiga Junior College in the d epartment of English alleging that 50 candidates selected by the department to a ccommodate in the post of lecturers had not been prepared correctly and in fact she should ought to have been impleaded as one of the beneficiaries. The petiti oner having not been impleaded any of the candidates amongst the 50 teachers an d realising the situation that on the basis of the framework of the writ petitio n, the petitioner is not entitled to get necessary relief as prayed for in this writ petition without impleadment of the affected teachers, has prayed for allo wing her to approach the authority in the administrative side. 3. The learned for the petitioner prays for allowing her to file a representation before the authority for its consideration raising her grievances pressing into service the order dated 19-5-2005 passed in W.P.(C) No. 10526/20 03. 4. Mr. Thomas, submits that another similar matter which arose out of W.P.(C) NO. 6909/2005, the Government has turned down the prayer of those pet itioners. 5. Upon hearing the learned counsels for the parties and in view o f the prayer so made, by the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of, with the direction that the petitioner is at liberty to file necessary representatio n before the appropriate authority highlighting her grievances and in the event of filing such representation, the authority may pass appropriate order in accor dance with law.