IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:02.02.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.8840 of 2006 S.Kannan .... Petitioner ..Vs.. 1. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.800,Anna Salai, Chennai- 600 002. 2.Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.110/11 KV, Valluvarkottam Sub-Station, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. 3.Executive Engineer (O & M), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Mylapore Division, Gowdiya Mutt Road, Royapettah, Chennai- 600 014 4.Assistant Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, CEDC-Central, No.33/11 KV, Sardarganj Garden Sub-Station, Royapettah, Chennai- 600 014 5.Price of Arcot Endowments, "Amir Mahal" Pycrofts Road, Royapettah, Chennai- 600 014 .... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus, forbearing the Respondents 1,2,3 and 4 from granting electricity connection to the illegal superstructure put up by the 5th respondent in the passage running North to South from Dr.Besant Road, Ice House, Royapettah, Chennai- 600 014 lending to Vasantha Mansion at No.30, Dr.Besant Road, Ice House, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Petitioner : M/s.Menon and Gokalaney For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran (R1 to R4) O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 4. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the fourth respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 23.05.2005, on merits, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the fourth respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 23.05.2005, on merits and in accordance with law,if it had not been disposed of, till date, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the fifth respondent, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 23.05.2005, to the fourth respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar arr To 1. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.800,Anna Salai, Chennai- 600 002. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.110/11 KV, Valluvarkottam Sub-Station, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. 3.Executive Engineer (O & M), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Mylapore Division, Gowdiya Mutt Road, Royapettah, Chennai- 600 014 4.Assistant Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, CEDC-Central, No.33/11 KV, Sardarganj Garden Sub-Station, Royapettah, Chennai- 600 014 1 cc To Mr.A.Selvendran, Advocate, SR.8195 1 cc To Mr..Menon and Gokalaney, Advocate, SR.2925 Writ Petition No.8840 of 2006 kji(co) pmk.21.2.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/