^ u s) \'Z^IQ5 BEFORE THE STfe-rE ADMINIS.l'RfaTIVE •IRIBUNAL, BENCK A_B.HLPUR, ^?n APPLia-^HT o^&^ s Muashilal Sbakya, ag about 40 yeacs, S/o Shri Cblmin&n Lal Sbakya? Oak Runner, Tubewel'l Stfo Division 80.29, &itibik6Fux~» .Oistt.Sarguja (Mp; R/o Gandhinager, L'j.stt. Sarguja(MP) -VS HON-AEPLICAKITS 1. State of Madbya Prades b tbrougti Secretary, Water Resources Department, soivernment of Madbya pradesh, Vallabb B hawan, Bhopal. CM.P.i 2. Ibe Executive Eagxaeer, Tubewell DivisiOE, Aistoikapur, District Sarguja (M.P.) DBIAIXS OF THE APPLICATION &BE.ICA1'ION 'UNDER S£CTIpN,_19 GB THtt._.ADI'a.NI§SRftTXVE TRIBUN&LS &GS. 1985. W "tti HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.1200/2005 PETITIONER Munshilal Shakya Versus RESPONDENTS State of Madhya Pradesh and another Sinnle Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Present: - None for the petitioner. Shri NTNaha Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 12th day of November, 2009) The matter is cailed for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. (2) In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner forthwith. i Gowri