IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2010 / 21TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 813 of 2010(B) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ JOJI KOZHY VARGHESE, S/O.KOZHY VARGHESE, T.C.3/1819, HOUSE NO.6, OASIS, JYOTHI NAGAR, KESAVADASAPURAM, PATTOM PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. MR.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. ADDL.DISTRCIT MAGISTRATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. TAHSILDAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. VILLAGE OFFICER, CHERUVAIKKAL VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 5. M.SOMASHEKHARAN NAIR, S/O MADHAVA PILLAI, MAKAM, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., AKKULAM ROAD, ULLOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. VIMALAKUMARI AMMA, D/O.KESAVA PILLAI, T.C.5/2092, KOTTIYOTTU VEEDU, CHERUVAIKKAL, SREEKARIYAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 ATO R4 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J ============================== W.P(C) No. 813 of 2010 ================================= Dated this the 11th day of January, 2010 ================================== J U D G M E N T The petitioner along with his wife purchased 7 cents of property in Resurvey No.727/20 of Cheruvaikkal Village from the 5th respondent on 9/9/2009. For getting the mutation done, the petitioner remitted necessary fee before the 4th respondent on 15/5/2009. It appears that the proceedings are not finalised in view of the complaint filed by the 6th respondent to the District Collector. The District Collector has transferred the same to the 2nd respondent for disposal and the petitioner submits that the 2nd respondent is not passing any final order in the matter. 2. Ext.P1 is the copy of the sale deed No.2392/09 and Ext.P2 application is filed before the 4th respondent by the petitioner. Ext.P3 is the copy of complaint filed by the 6th respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that the complaint of the 6th respondent is false and already report has been called for, which is evident from Ext.P4. -2- W.P(C) No. 813 of 2010 3. Since the petitioner only seeks for a direction to the 2nd respondent to pass orders on Ext.P3, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to pass final order on Ext.P3, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this writ petition, along with a copy of this Judgment, before the 2nd respondent for compliance. No costs. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE nl