IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14326 of 2008 **** Manav Kartava Bodh Jagriti Sansthan, through its Secretary Vijay Vatsyayan, son of Late Parmanand Singh ‘Madan’, resident of village Chatauna, Police Station Samastipur Mufassil, District Samastipur …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Rural, Development Department, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Begusarai. 4. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Begusarai. 5. The Block Development Officer, Khodawantpur, District Begusarai. 6. The Circle Officer, Khodawantpur, District Begusarai. …. …. Respondents ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shivendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, Junior Counsel to Government Advocate-VII ---------------- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal --------- Dated, the 30th September, 2008. After having heard the counsel for the petitioner, we are satisfied that the controversy raised in the writ petition, does not deserve to be entertained in the high prerogative jurisdiction, moreso in the writ petition entitled public interest litigation. 2. As a matter of fact grant of relief to the petitioner depends on establishing the fact that the subject plots are part of public road. To establish this fact evidence has to be let in. We are of - 2 - the view that matter needs to be agitated in an appropriate civil suit. 3. Writ petition does not deserve to be admitted. It is dismissed in limine. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J Pawan/-