IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 14264 of 2010 Date of Decision: 12.8.2010. Ashok Kumar --Petitioner Versus U.H.B.V.N and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.S. Kundu, Addl. A.G., Haryana has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The short grievance of the petitioner is that although he was fully eligible for the grant of 1st A.C.P w.e.f.1.1.1996 and the 2nd A.C.P w.e.f. 27.2.2000 but he has not been granted the benefit of A.C.P. The petitioner has made two representations (Annexures P-10 & P-11) and also served a legal notice (Annexure P-16) but the respondents have not decided the same till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the representations/legal notice served by the petitioner, referred to above. CWP. No. 14264 of 2010 -2- In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take decision on the representations/legal notice served by the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 12.8.2010. lucky