c() od.Z- SINGLE BEWCS 04 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fC.G.V W.P.No.. 1 ^5^of2005 Petitjoner: / Ishwar Prasacj Swarnakar S/o SitaRam Swarnkar Aged about 52 years, Occupation - Ad-hocTeacher, Govt. M.H.S.School Sarangarh Dist- Raigarh(C.G.) R/o Mahatma Gandhi Chowk, Baniya Para, .) (Presently discontinued) ^g.^A^arangarh District- Raigarh (C.G. .^•^'^ ^*'^" ^ ^Dr'ocAntltj rlicr'nnt'ii .\.-l-;-"\A.'-t:>^-^' ^^^••^.....••-•••c^ '^'^-r^' ^^.•^Resoondents :^1. ^ 2. ,<..^'"1 ^ -^^^\0 ^ Versus State of Chhattisgarh Through :- Secretary Department of Education D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchnalaya Behind Bord of Secondary Education, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) Distt. Education Officer, Education- District Raigarh (C.G.) State of M.P. Through:- Secretary Department of Education, Vallab Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTEON OF INDIA. $^ ^3. ^4. XI-HC-22 3TI^T^)T ^i<+)37T^T ^TT^^cT 3:ST "41^1d<<, 8>Tft^i^C, (s|<>1l<-)^< 3:n^T M51<sh *<i^di ff)+aicb^....^.i^0./?^ •»*•••• »«^y^ •-«••»/••' 4Q ^200 -3n^T?^<[T3[K^ri?cT 2S.4.200S Mr. K.N. Nande, counsel Mr. Akhil Agrawal, Panel Heard. The case of the petitio Department of erstwhile State 4 Assistant Teachers in the Gove^ selected and accordingly, he wa^ wages, However. the services ol which arises on account of the filled by the State of M.P. representations for considering teacher. Further case of the p4 State of M.P. took a decision tt Karmi but same is not being im] Learned counsel for th^ |br the petitioner. [Lawyer for the State, petitioi'i raising all his grievanc^! representation, to which couns^] facts and circumstances of tlt' representation along with copy today to respondent No.2 raisin is directed to decide the repre^ months from the date of receipf grievances raised by the petitio^1 With the direction aforesj Consequently, I.A. Nos.2( Certitied copy as per rul^^ <=bl^f<n^^ HTR^ff ^' te^t iRi^K ^3Tf^T3TI^T \ier is that in the year 1979 the Education f M.P. conducted a test for the appointment of nment. Schools. In that test the petitioner was appointed as Upper Division Teachers on daily the petitioner were discontinued and vacaiicy discontinuation of the petitioner s services was 'hereafter^ the petitioner is regularfy making :he petitioner to the appointment on the post of titioner is that in the year 1997 the erstwhile 3 appoint ad-hoc teachers in place of Shiksha )lemented by State ofChhattisgarh. petitioner submits that petitioner may be allowed to make a representati|on to respondent No.2 along with copy of this s and respondent No.2 be directed to decide his for the respondents has no objection. Having heard learned cc^unsel for the parties and having regard to the case, the petitioner is allowed to make a rf this petition-within a period of ten da;rs trom all his grievances and in turn respondent No.2 gntation of the petitioner within another three of the representation after considering all the er in accordance with law. iid, the petition staiids disposed of. ^78/05 & 2979/05 also stand disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge '^ y