{1} wp164106.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1641 OF 2006 Rajendra s/o Kashinath Londhe Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.A.S.Golegaonkar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.R.P.Phatke, A.G.P for respondents no.1 & 2. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE AND R.M.BORDE, JJ. DATE :02 nd February, 2011 PER COURT: Mr.Golegaonkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that with the passage of time, this petition has become infructuous. We have perused the affidavit dated 24.01.2011 filed by Respondent Nos.1 & 2 and more particularly, paragraphs 3 and 4 thereof. We are even otherwise satisfied that sufficient provision for Anganwadis and Balwadis is made by the respondents. In the circumstances, the petition is dismissed. R.M.BORDE D.B.BHOSALE JUDGE JUDGE adb/wp164106