IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 1498 of 2002 Between: 1. Nekkanti Vijaya Bhaskar, S/o Subba Rao, Hindu Age 45Yrs., R/o Bolugondu,Krithivennu Mandal, Krishna District 2. Nallamilli Ammireddi, S/o Veera Reddy, Hindu, Age 35Yrs., Ontilu village, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONERS AND District Collector, Krishna District and 5 others. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 to 4 in failure to close/remove the prawn tank excated by the respondents 5 & 6 in Ac.3.05 cents of land in R.S.No.241/2 of Krithivennu village, Krithivennu Mandal, Krishna District, is contrary to the conditions as denied in the Coastal RegulationZone (CRZ) notification dated 09-07-2007, issued by the Government of India as arbitrary and illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 48-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 5 & 6 to close/remove the tank with immediate effect and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.SIVALENKA RAMACHANDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 1498 of 2002 O R D E R : It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 24-11-2008 KLP