S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2723/2002 Kailash Lal Rai Vs. JNV University, Jodhpur Date of Order :: 17.3.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. U.S. Gehlot, for the petitioner. Mr. D.S. Sharma, for the respondents. ... Counsel for the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in this petition for writ is no more res integra in view of the judgment of this Court dated 4.1.2007 in SBCivil Writ Petition No.3260/2004 (M.D. Lohiya & Ors. Vs. State ). I have examined the facts of the present case. The petitioner retired from the service of the respondent-University on 31.1.1998 while holding the post of Sr. Technical Assistant. The controversy invovled in this petition for writ is exactly same as it was in the case of M.D. Lohiya & Ors. (supra). Accordingly, this petition for writ is allowed in the terms of the judgment dated 4.1.2007 in the case of M.D. Lohiya & Ors. (supra) and the respondents are directed that the case of the petitioner be also decided as per the directions given in the case of M.D. Lohiya & Ors. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal