IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2009 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 33953 of 2009(L) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- NABEEL AHAMMED.P.M, S/O.BEERAN, AGED 22 YEARS, NAEEMA'S HAJI ROAD, PUTHIYANGADI, MADAYI, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.BABU S. NAIR RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY MR.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss P.N.RAVINDRAN,J. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.33953 of 2009 - L ---------------------------------------- Dated 3rd December, 2009 Judgment The petitioner appeared for the fifth and sixth semester B.Tech. Degree Examinations in Mechanical Engineering conducted by the University of Calicut in December, 2008. The result of the fifth semester examination was published on 6.10.2009 and of the sixth semester examination on 28.8.2009. The petitioner failed in one paper each of fifth and sixth semester examinations. He has therefore applied for revaluation by submitting separate applications. Ext.P2 is a copy of the application for revaluation in respect of the fifth semester examination. However, a copy of the application for revaluation in respect of the sixth semester examination is not produced. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious revaluation of his answer scripts on the ground that he has completed his course of study and has passed all the other semester examinations. W.P.(C) No.33953/2009 2 2. Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, the learned standing counsel appearing for the University of Calicut submits that applications for revaluation have been received from the petitioner and the University will take expeditious steps to revalue the petitioner's answer scripts and to communicate the result to him. In the light of the said submission, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to take steps to have the petitioner's answer scripts revalued and to communicate the result to him within eight weeks from the date on which the petitioner produces a certified copy of this judgment before the Controller of Examinations, University of Calicut. P.N.RAVINDRAN Judge vaa