^^- IH THE H33SH COURT OF JUBICSTUBE AT BILASPUR(CHH&TTISG&RH) WRIT PETITION N0. Af^> "J- OF 2003 PETITIONER Madanlal Desblahre, son o£ Shrl DevSas Deshlahre,aged about 32 years, resident of Village- &njora,(Dhaba). Dlstrlet Durg, Sarpanch e£ Gram paaehayat,&nj@ra, (Dhaba), Olstrl.ct Durg, (C.G. ) V E R S U S RESPOHDEN'ES i^ 1. State of Chbattisgarh, threugh .^s^ ^CiP'; ^.^^' ^^^•'v 'y ' {^' paraehayat, O.K.S.BuUding, Mantralaya.Ralpur,(C.G.) 2. Aad.i.tional CelJLector»Durg, District Durg,(C.G.) 3. Gram panehayat Anjora(Dhaba) District Durg,(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UtDER &RTICI.@226/227 OF THE; COEeTITUTION OP INDI&. ^, t -EIA ilars__ef_the Petltioner i "1: S':. 30-HC-22: aii^rqn k-Wi 3IRRT ^tlN> ^rf^ ••^SS^S^^^:'^K^^ T5?N2Ra?, ^Wwff®,Ptawy ii(*«tfa»*it»o Sn^T 1CR9? __M£..}i&...li^^ ••^ 2003 fe^r" sa^rwim^ifpf D»t Hoa'Me Jnartlce K. H. & Hon'bte JnsUce In C. is/io/aoTO Kunu^n, <!^J. ?hadoo, J. Petitioner by Sbri H. S. Respondcnts No. l an|d Advocate General. By tfais writ petitio^ P&tcl, Advooate. 2 by Shri Sunfl Siaha, Additioiial Constitution of India fhfe constitutionat validitv and tbe Chhattisgarh Pancbayat Rsy (for short fhe Adlimlyam) wl4' cligibte to bc an officc-bearcr] Januaiy, 2001. The chancagei in view ofthe law laal down bv Javed and otbws Va. State 3003 AIR 8CW 3892 and Court ia the case of alsb i<>Wf<-l<i)-i •ONcif'^feA <[»I«$K ^-aipipTsn^i iindcr Articles 226/227 of fhc petitioner has chaUenged fhe wres of Scction 36 (l)(m) of the ^vam Qram Swaiaj Adlumyam, 1993 fcli lavs down fhat no person sjhaB be |of tfac Panchayat wbo has inorc tbaa two living cjhildrcn onc of wliom js bora on or aflcr 26U1 dav of to tfac above clausc docs not siuvivc tfae Hon'ble Apex Court in fhe case of of Harytuin aad otbas reported In in view of the order passed by tfais Ktunar Sdin V«. State of Vaadhmnt CUhatU^BarIi and another p^saed tn Writ PetMon Mo. 463 of 2002. ^fi. ^ J. C'S^A- XI-HC-22 aii^rw Pi-li.'l) Sf^W Sir^) ^ffi^T t^^1? oits d-ni ^ww^, •s^ms, facii'My sn^r '<^K \»jfUM'lln-s ^^..!.:.-i....-:.l...\..:.^..^......^^ yfy Hmvn siiw* •^ fa<i<yT' aii^r ^RtlW:-^?ft^ ^ Tbc pctitfoacr has also cB by the Additioaal Coltector, Annexure P/l. The petitioner l^as cfficacK>us altemative reaacdy to fite an. appeal before fhe Dn|;ctor of Pasicbayat oa fhe factual grounds agaiast the order pass^d by fhe Additional OoBector. In view of the abovc the: Howcver, fhc petitioncr shaB bi Director of Panchayat against tli which he has been declared dis petitioner wfll be entitled to the The pardes are entitted foi tfrt^i^i4l'i ^fl^Rtf^ ^s^ •i.Rq^R: ^?3t|iOT 3)I^i aUcagcd flic oidcr ofrcinoval passed Duig dated 16th Januaiy 2003 re. is no foxce in the petition of tfae petitioner, the saiae is liable t^ bc dKinissed aud it M dismisscd. i at libcrty to fflc appeal bcfore thc e ordcr dated 16th Januaiy, 2003 by ^ualified to continue as ofEfoe bearer of thc Village Panchayat Aijtjora (Dhaba), District-Durg. The beiiefit of the lumitatfon for the tune spent by them in Utigating befi>r^ thls Court m this writ proceediug. ®1 Sd/- Quef Jiistice certifled copy ofthte ordcr. 1 A- Sd»-- L.C. Bhadoo o