IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO : 9685 of 2009 Between: 1 M.V.Krishna Reddy S/o.M.Peda Chenci Reddy Resident of Plot No.933, V.V.Nagar Colony Kukatpally, Hyderabad 2 M.V.Rami Reddy S/o.Peda Chenchi Reddy Resident of Plot No.933, V.V.Nagar Colony Kukatpally, Hyderabad 3 Smt.Kamala L Patel S/o.Lakshman Patel R/o.H.No.2-31, Bagh Ameri, Kukatpally, Hyderabad 4 M.Madhusudhan Rao S/o.M.Chandra Rao R/o.H.No.4-4/1 Kukatpalli,Hyderabad ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The STate of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad, rep.by its PRincipal Secretary 2 The Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, III Floor, Chandravihar Complex 3 The Tahasildar, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 4 M./s.Bhagyanagar Coop.Housing Society (TB-721) Plot No.32, Opp: AP Housing Board colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-500072 .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the State and its authorities in arrving that the petitioner houses in House No.15-21-32./1/2, Plot No.2,No.15-21-32/1/4, Plot No.1 No.15-21-32/1/3,plot No.3, in SY.No.1092/A, and 1092/C,15-21-32/6, Plot No.6 admeasuring 350 sq.yards No.15-21-32/5 Plot No.5 admeasuring 350 sq.yds and House No.15-231-32/4,Plot No.4 in admeasuring 389 sq.yds plot No.55 admeasuring 187 sq.yds coverd in MCK Block No.21 and plot No.71 & 70 admeasuring 368.33 sq.yds in Sy.No.1092/A, and 1092/C situated at Kukatpally village and Municipality,Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dsitrict a sexcess vacant land vide proceedings No.F1/6494/94 and erroneous statements u/sd.9 ,10(1) notification dated 26.4.2005,10(3) notification dated 28.4.2005 ,.10(5) notice dated 17.1.2006 are without jurisdiction andwithout 6(1) Statement before the then Special officer and competent Authority in violation of principles of natural justice and declare that G.O.Ms.No.251 Rev.(UC.II) Department dated 3.3.2005 is erroneous illegal ,malafide and bad in view of Sec.19(1)(9)(v) of the Repeal Act and Circular Memo No.17377/UC-1(1)/2008-1 dated 24.4.2008 and set aside the same Counsel for the Petitioners:MRS.PULIPATI RADHIKA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1to 3: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a letter dated 04.05.2009 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel the interim order dated 01.05.2009 passed in W.P.M.P.No.12608 of 2009 shall stand vacated. No costs. ______________________ VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR, J 06th May, 2009 SKM