IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (Lodging) No.304 OF 2009 Madhu L. Swetta ..Petitioner. Vs. The Hon’ble the Chief Justice. ..Respondent. Mr Ahmed Abdi i/b Abdi & Co. Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr Nitin Gangal i/b Dhanshree Shende, for Respondent Nos. 3 to 20. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND A.R. JOSHI,JJ. A.R. JOSHI,JJ. A.R. JOSHI,JJ. DATED : 18TH FEBRUARY,2009. DATED : 18TH FEBRUARY,2009. DATED : 18TH FEBRUARY,2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Not on board, upon mentioning taken on board. 2. In this petition, the prayer made is that the learned Chief Justice of the High Court should be directed to transfer the case from one Judge to another Judge. There are a number of judgments of the Supreme Court which hold that the Chief Justice is master of the roster and it is his prerogative to assign the cases to different Benches of the Court. Therefore, on this short point the petition is misconceived. In the result, the writ petition is hereby dismissed. 3. However, we have seen from the affidavit filed by the counsel for the Petitioner that there are certain allegations levelled against a Judge of this Court. Copy of the affidavit be sent to the learned Advocate General, who may give his opinion as to whether this affidavit constitutes a contempt or court or not. 4. List the matter after two weeks. (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (BILAL NAZKI,J.) (BILAL NAZKI,J.) (BILAL NAZKI,J.)