CRM No. M- 16078 of 2009 Sukhdev Singh and another vs. State of Punjab Present: Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners. *** The petitioners had earlier filed application for anticipatory bail which was rejected by the learned Additional sessions Judge, Gurdaspur vide order dated 14.3.2009. Thereafter a compromise is said to have been effected between the parties on 4.6.2009. Consequent to that the petitioners have preferred this petition for anticipatory bail. In my opinion the execution of the alleged compromise would constitute such a change in circumstances as to warrant a second application for anticipatory bail before the Court of Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur. In view of these observations learned counsel for the petitioners prays for permission to withdraw the present petition so as to avail the alternate remedy of filing anticipatory bail application before the learned Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur. Allowed as prayed for. Dismissed as withdrawn. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE June 09, 2009 sunita