1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No. 171 of 2010 in Writ Petition No. 3673 of 2002 Akbar Ali Noormohammed Gilani Aged 58 years, Occu. Business, R/o Mohada, Tah. Kelapur, Dist. Yavatmal. ...VERSUS... 1] Gram Panchayat, Mohoda through its Sarpanch, R/o Mohada, Tah. Kelapur, Dist. Yavatmal. 2] Deputy Director of Land Records, Amravati Division, Amravati. 3] Lalsingh S/o Nasaru Rathod, Aged 52 years, Occu. Business, R/o Runza, Tah. Kelapur, Dist. Yavatmal. 4] Arun S/o Keshavrao Kharwade, Aged 37 years, Occu. Business, R/o Mohada, Tah. kelapur, Dist. Yavatmal 5] Raghunath S/o Damu Borkar, Aged 52 years, Occu. Business, R/o Mohada, Tah. Kelapur, Dist. Yavatmal. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==- Mr. A.R.Wagh, Advocate for the Appellant. C ORAM : D.B.BHOSALE ; and PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATED : 13th August, 2010. 2 1] Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2] By this Letters Patent Appeal, the appellant has challenged the order dated 05/11/2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 3673 of 2002. By this order, the writ petition has been allowed. 3] The writ petition was directed against the order dated 23/7/2002 passed by respondent no.2 - Deputy Director of Land Records, Amravati Division, Amravati, rejecting the application filed by respondent no.1 - Gram Panchayat for condonation of delay in filing the appeal against the order dated 17/10/1995 passed by the Superintendent of Land Records, Yavatmal. 4] Learned counsel for the appellant, on our query, fairly submitted that in view of the impugned order the appeal is going on before respondent no.2. In view thereof, he does not press the appeal and seeks direction to respondent no.2 - Deputy Director of land Records to dispose of the appeal within time frame. 5] From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the Deputy Director of Land Records was directed to dispose of the appeal within a period of six months from the date of the judgment. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the period of six months is over and as per his instructions, till this date the appeal is not finally decided. 3 6] In the circumstances, we dispose of this appeal as not pressed. The Deputy Director of Land Records, Amravati Division, Amravati shall endeavour to dispose of the appeal filed by respondent no.1 – Gram Panchayat, if not disposed of already, within a period of three months from today. 7] With these observations, the appeal is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale