IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9850 of 2011-E Date of decision: 28.11.2011 Hans Raj …..petitioner Versus State of H.P. & another …..respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K.Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petition is filed with the following prayers: “i) That a writ of mandamus may very kindly be issued thereby directing the respondents to transfer the petitioner to one of the station of his choice as mentioned in annexure P-2. ii) That a writ of mandamus may very kindly be issued thereby directing the respondents to decide the representation as contained in annexure P-2.” 2. Petitioner has submitted a representation, Annexure P-2, before the second respondent. There will be a direction to the second respondent to look into Annexure P-2, in terms of the policy and take appropriate action thereon, in accordance with law, within a period of one month after the present winter on production of a copy …2… of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the second respondent. 2. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s) if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. November 28, 2011 (Justice Sanjay Karol), (rana/hl) Judge.