IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16824 of 2011 Bashishth Sah Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03/ 12.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 12.3.2011 in a case registered under sections 270, 272, 273 of the IPC and 47 A of the Excise Act. Allegedly, 404 liters country made wine, 160 liters sprit pouch manufacturing tools and several other apparatus were recovered from the house of the petitioner. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is the first offender and he has already suffered a lot remaining in jail custody since 12.3.2011. I am not at all convinced with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Sursand P.S. Case no.31/2011 pending in the court of Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri at Sitamarhi stands rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after four months, if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within the above stated period. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)