IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46138 of 2008 NARAYAN MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.12.2008 Heard Sri Rishikesh Ojha, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri D. Mehta, APP for the State. The petitioner is said to have pierced a Chhura into the rib cage of the deceased. It is contended that the blow was given in the hit of the movement and it could not be an offence under Section 302 IPC. If one could consider the facts of the case one could definitely differ with the contention of the petitioner as there is definite allegation that the petitioner ran with Chhura, chased the deceased and then pierced it into his body. The petition is dismissed. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)