1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.476 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.743 OF 2006 Hitesh Kirtikumar Thakkar ...Plaintiff. Vs. Narayan Venkatesh Shanbaug ...Defendant. Mr.R.D.Vora, Advocate for the Plaintiff. Mr.Nilesh S. Parte i/by Mr. S.B.Prabhawalkar, Advocate for the Defendant. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 8TH JUNE, 2009. P.C.- 1. The Chamber Summons is taken out by the Plaintiff in a suit of Specific Performance whereby, through this Chamber Summons the Plaintiff is seeking to add averments and prayer clause for damage and compensation in case the suit is decreed in his favour as defendant is in possession of the premises in spite of the agreement in 2 question. 2. Admittedly, the issues are not yet framed. The trial is not yet begin. In view of this, in the interest of justice, I am inclined to grant this Chamber summons. However, it is made clear that all defences are kept open. 3. The Chamber Summons is accordingly allowed. The Plaintiff to carry out the amendment within a period of two weeks. No order as to costs. The liberty is granted to file additional defence/ written statement. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)