IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6015 of 2003 Between: K.Pushapalatha W/o Late K.Sudarshan, R/o 2-3-134, Near Old Bus Stand, Metpally, Karimnagar District - 505 325 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Union of India Rep. by its Finance Secretary Company Affairs Department, New Delhi 2 The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Home Secretary, Secretariat Saifabad Hyderabad 3 The Company Law Board Rep. by its Secretary, Sastry Bhavan, 5th Floor, Block 8, No.26, Haddows Road, Chennai 4 The Registrar of Companies Hyderabad, Kendriaya Sadan 2nd Floor, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad 5 M/s Nagarjuna Finance Limited, Rep. by its President N.Selvaraj S/o Narayanaswamy, Reliance Mansion, Domalguda, Lower Tank Bund, Hyderabad 6 K.S.Raju S/o Late Sri K.V.K.Raju, Digvijayam Plot No.933A, Road No.47, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare inaction of the respondents 1 to 4 in monitoring the affairs of the respondents 5 and 6 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violate of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and direct the respondents 1 to 4 to initiate the criminal actions against respondent Nos.5 & 6 for clear violation of the orders of the respondent No.3 in accordance with the provisions of the I.P.C., the Companies Act, 1956 and RBI Act before the competent Courts and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.V.RAMANA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6015 of 2003 ORDER: When the matter came up for hearing on 05-06-2009, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, it was directed to be posted today. Even on this day also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this matter. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs _____________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J 9th June, 2009 PN/KM HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6015 of 2003 9th June, 2009