1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3746 OF 2008 (Shri Amol Ravindra Palandurkar vs. ICICI Bank Ltd.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. OCTOBER 17, 2008. Heard Shri Sadavarte, learned counsel for the petitioner – plaintiff and Shri De, learned counsel for the respondent – defendant. Shri Sadavarte, learned counsel states that by order dated 18.7.2008, the District Judge, 8, Nagpur, has while passing orders on an application for permission to withdraw the amount, directed its investment for a period of two years. He states that as the present petitioner has secured money decree, the direction is unwarranted and arbitrary. He further states that the respondent itself had given say and pointed out in the alternative that if the amount is allowed to be withdrawn, the present petitioner should be directed to furnish security. He argues that the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish security to the satisfaction of the District Judge-8, Nagpur. Shri De, learned counsel states that in 2 view of the say given by the respondent in the trial Court, this Court may pass appropriate orders. In the circumstances, the impugned order dated 18.7.2008 passed by the district Judge-8, Nagpur, is hereby quashed and set aside. The application seeking permission to withdraw the amount as filed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 566 of 2007 is hereby allowed subject to the petitioner furnishing security to the satisfaction of the District Judge-8, Nagpur, before effecting that withdrawal. Writ Petition is disposed of. Rule accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.