CLCON No. 40 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the applicant. The applicant contends willful disobedience of the order dated 30/12/2009 passed by the writ court by the opposite parties. The applicant alleges that by an interim order dated 30th December, 2009, the recovery initiated against the applicant was stayed subject to the conditions that the applicant would deposit a sum of Rs. 40,000/- with the Cashier, Administrative Division, I.R.I., Rookee, District Haridwar on or before 15th January, 2010. The applicant contends that the certified copy of the interim order was not made available and that he had filed an application before the authority intimating them about the interim order passed by the writ court and requested that the recovery certificate should be kept in abeyance, inspite of which, the opposite parties arrested the applicant and released him only after the payment of Rs.44,000/-. The applicant consequently contends that the opposite parties has willfully disobeyed the interim order. Having heard the learned counsel for the applicant and having perused the record, this Court finds that there is a little grey area whereby the opposite parties could go outside the purview of willful violation of the order of the writ court and this grey area is the fact that no certified copy of the order passed in writ petition was placed before the opposite parties. The applicant has not filed any affidavit before the authority concerned indicating that the interim order had been passed by the writ court. Consequently, in the absence of the certified copy of the order, the opposite parties was justified in recovering the amount pursuant to the recovery certificate. No willful disobedience of the order of the writ court was made. The contempt application is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 13.04.2010 Shiv