IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 14683 of 2008 Between: Maddineni Chitanya, S/o. Narasimha Rao, Hindu, R/o. RTC Colony, Near Saibaba Temple, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Shakthi Bhavan, Vijayawada. 2 The Superintendent, Excise and Prohibition Department, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3 The Circle Inspector, Excise and Prohibition Department, Kandkipadu Village and Mandal, Krishna District. 4 The VGTM (VUDA), Rep. byits Vice Chairman, Governorpet, Vijayawada. 5 The Gram Panchayat, Punadipadu, Kankipadu Mandal, Krishna District, Rep. byits Secretary. 6 Nerusu Satish, Father's Name not Known, R/o. Uppaluru Village, Kankipadu Mandal, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue any Writ orderor direction more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus by declaring the inaction on the part of the oﬃcial respondents on the representation, dated 02-7-2008 of the petitioner herein as arbitrary illegal and unconstitutional further direct the oﬃcial respondents herein to take action against the 6th respondent's liquor business in the name and style of Vijaya Sai Wines illegally at Plot No. 69 in the layout proceedings in Rc.No. C8-493/2007, dated 13-06-2007, Punadipadu Village, Kankipadu Mandal, Krishna District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.Y.SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI W.P.No.14683 of 2008 ORAL ORDER This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a declaration that the inaction on the part of the respondents 1 to 5 in considering his representation dated.02-07-2008 complaining about the wine shop unauthorizedly being run by the 6th respondent in plot No.69 in the layout proceedings in Rc.No.C8-493/2007, of Punadipadu village, Kankipadu Mandal, Krishna Distirct, as arbitrary and illegal. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise appearing for the respondents 1 to 3. Keeping in view that the representation is pending before the respondents 1 to 5, without expressing any opinion as to the correctness of the allegation made by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents 1 to 5 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated.02-07-2008 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. Needless to mention that before passing such order the 6th respondent shall be given an opportunity to make his representation. No costs. _______________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt.16 .10.2008 *T SNR