@§ Single Bench IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAR BILASPUR (cm w.P. (S) N0. 3554f 2011 MIW Sukwar Singh Slo. Shn' Nanki Ram, aged about 56 years, Head Master GovemmentPtimarySchoolTendutoha, Post Office Ragja, Block : Sakti, Distn‘ct : Janjgir - Champa (C.G) VERSUS /, 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Schoot Education Depattment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G) . Director, Public Instructions, Raipur (CG) / 3. District Education Officer, surgujaJwHaAA District :§u:gu}a;(crG-) t— XNw'aq 4. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts, Pension,Ambika§ap, District”sawmw Wag) 3W. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON$TITUTION OF 'INDIA H 2 awr— Shri Jeet Patel, counsel for Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State. %ally. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard on a fixed pay of Rs.100/—. After successfully completing the probation period of2 years, he was granted regular pay scale. Learned counsel appearing in the case is as to whether, the pi from the date of initial appointmen The issue invoived herein Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur others V. State of MP. & others), wherein, it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment. The matter was ta en up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in special Leave Petition (Civil) No.6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, uphoiding the ecision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. Learned counsel appearin for the petitioner further submits that this Court, while considering the same is ue in Amer Sai Ram & Others v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others [\IV.P.(S) N 4725/2006] by order dated 01/09/2006, allowed the petitioners to make a represe tation within a period of ten days, raising all their grievances and in turn, the con erned respondent was directed to decide the The petitioner is appointee the petitioner. for the petitioner submits that the issue involved ztitioner is entitled to regular pay scale with effect tor after completion of probation period. was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State in O.A.No.2745l89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 i, mfzma—l-‘sn 40—2/201 1—1 ,so,ooo. W x 7 mmwww 555?(z.W I ’ 200 mm (mew) WWW wmm mmm WW 1€¢M %ai1%mm SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava J. 06-07-2011 . Wf.).3. " mm wt zoo WWW wmm WWW r Q_ mm fgdm $aimanéw r within a period of 30 days from the date of representation in an objective man receipt of the representation. Learned counsel for the petit oner further submits that now the State Govt. has issued an order on 5/01/2011 (Annexure P/3) wherein, it has been ordered that those who have been appointe before 1982 and after 1995 on a nxed pay, are entitied to regutar pay scale from the date of initial appointment upon successfui completion of two years eriod of probation. Accordingiy, the petitioner is ranted liberty to make representation raising all his grievance, in the light of the aforesaid judgment and circuiar dated 05/01/2011, and in turn, the con erned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance three months from the date of receipt of the representation, subject to verification i of the facts. in view of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Deepn with iaw, on its own merits, within a period of Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge WWW, WWW—FM 40—2/201 1—1 ,so,ooo. WW(W)