IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.57342 of 2007 ASHOK KUMAR SINGH & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 2.5.2008. N.H./ Heard both sides. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case under section 406/34 of I.P.C. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that no misappropriation/embezzlement was done by them. The work was completed just after filing of the case, which is apparent from the supervision report of Dy.S.P. mentioned in paragraph- 146 of the case diary. Perused the supervision note mentioned in paragraph-146 of the case diary. On perusal of it, it is quite clear that after filing of the case, this petitioner being a contractor completed the work. There is nothing due against them. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in case of arrest or surrender before the court below within four weeks of receipt of this order, petitioners, namely, Ashok Kumar Singh and Baban Prasad Mehta are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram in Darihat P.S. Case No.21 of 2003, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ( Ghanshyam Prasad ) - 2 -