^ ^ J._ 'a SINGLE B' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION N0. 4S7/ / 2005 PETITIONERS: PLAINTIFS RESPONDENTS: DEFENDANTS : ^ .^y ^^/' /r-^/ ^ -^^t^&/ .M°^° ^cv ^ 'rfy •^y^ w , 1. Awadliram S/o Rewaram Sahu 2. Santosh S/o Rewaram Sahu 3. Bodlian S/o Rewaram Sahu 4. Leelaram S/o RewaramSallu All Resident ofVillage Bhilai Patwari Circle No. 147, R.I. Circle Arang Tehsil & District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS ^ 1. State ofChliattisgarh, Through Collector, Distaict Raipur, C.G.. 2. Naib Tehsildar, Arang, Tehsil Arang, District Raipur.C.G.. 3. Gram Panchayat Bhilai, Through its Sarpanch Tehsil Arang District Raipur, C.G. WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA r-" XI-HC-78 *i 1*101 ^*n<i» \jw| Hll^lrt^, u>-n1^«Ka,Rwi^yx ^o.f! ^O. Li3~T/^D5' ^200 3ff^§T<PTR^ ^PffOT^^T^ii^ raju ^ /^ ^ OT^^T q^J? (l4i^<s|tg) ?^TTWr^rf^T3TT^$T 14^0&^20Z5S~ Shri Satyendra Sahu, Petitioners have filed ti Coiistitation of ludia, que cpi<»io<nri^i+ioT^'t^1-^ x^-ciK ^3rf^RT3n^$T ^ Counsel for the petitioners- Shri Yashwaat Siagh T|hakiu', Govt, Advocate for the State. Heaixi, lis writ petition under Article 227 of the stionmg the fegality, propriety ao.d correctn.ess ofthe order date^. 01/04/ 1998 passed by 6th Additional Distdct Judge, Raipur, w^iex^by the leamed Aclditioual District Judge affii-mcd ttic oixler djatcd 06/12/1995 passed by 5th Civil Judge, Class 2, Raipiir, m Cpivil Suit No.82-A/94 on an apptication filed under Order 39, Rule] Petitioners filed a c 1 and 2 of tlie C.P.C., whercby the learaed Civil Judge rejected Ijhe application offhe petitioners. vil suit befoi^ tlie Civil Judge for declai'ation of title aiid | peiinao.ent injunction agaiast the respondents. Both tlie tria^ Court and appellate Court reached to the conclusion that the petitijoners have uo, prima facie, case, Haviiig perused fhe orcg.ers oftrial Court and appellate Court^ I ain of the opinion that there] with botli tlie oixlers, a^ su<| ajid the saoie is accorcliiigly| directed to expedite the trial early as possible, preferably date ofreceipt ofthe copy of| is uo grouncl for this Coiirt to interfere th thc petition dcsexves to be disinissed |disiaissed. However, tlie trial Court is bf tlie Civil Siut aiid decide the sanie as ^vithui a period of six nionths froiB. the this orcler. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge