IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5893 of 2011 KRISHNA CHANDRA, S/O RAM EQBAL MANDAL, R/O JANKI ASTHAN, MANDAL NAGAR, P.S.-SITAMARHI IN THE DISTRICT OF SITAMARHI. ......PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE BIHAR SANSKRIT SHIKSHA BOARD, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, PATNA. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR SANSKRIT SHIKSHA BOARD, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR SANSKRIT SHIKSHA BOARD, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. RAMENDRA SAH, S/O LATE JIYA LAL SAH AT PRESENT POSTED AS HEAD MASTER, KAUSHALYA SANSKRIT HIGH SCHOOL MAHUA, P.S.-MAHUA, VAISHALI, DISTRICT-VAISHALI. ....RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 07.04.2011 Mr.Shivaji Pandey appearing for the petitioner takes a very fair stand in the case. He submits that though the dispute in this case is with regard to the headmastership of the school in question in between petitioner and respondent no.4, the students should not suffer because of that dispute. Therefore, he submits that the Board be directed to accept the fee and forms of the students of the school for allowing them to appear in the examination without creating any evidence or without creating any right in favour of any person who claims any advantage in respect of his claim for headmastership of the school. He submits that since the last date of acceptance of fee and forms is 10th April, 2011, the Board may accept the same 2 from any person who submits the same upon verification of genuineness of the students and allow them to appear in the examination. In view of the stand of Mr. Pandey, this Court directs the Board to accept the fee and forms in respect of the students of the school from any person who may submit the same, get it verified from the school records, if necessary, with regard to the genuineness of the students and accept them and allow the students to appear in the examination. This Court makes it clear that this act of the Board will not create any advantage to any person, who may submit the fee and forms, in respect of his claim for headmastership of the school. In view of this fair stand of Mr.Pandey in the case, this Court does not find any necessity to keep the matter pending as the learned counsel for the Board has also agreed to the said order. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)