IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52004 of 2008 RAGHVENDRA NARAIN RAKESH Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----- 4/ 01.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. An amount of Rs. 26,50,000/- was advanced to the petitioner under the scheme to be expended on different heads. It is admitted to the petitioner himself that Rs. 12,88,000/- remained unexpended. He deposited Rs. 65,000/- when he made over additional charge only after leveling of allegation. For the rest amount, it is said that work has been done but on enquiry, concerned officials did not find such work. Till today, investigation is not bifurcating the cast of the work done if any for purchase of articles and admittedly Rs. 12,88,000/- remain unexpended and the withdrawal money Rs. 65,000/- remained with this petitioner after giving up of the post. Only amount of defalcation is to be verified in course of investigation but in any case, I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)