1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3225 OF 2005 Shri Harishchandra Rajaram Archrekar.. Petr v/s The Trustees of Mumbai Port Trust .. Respt ... Mr.V.Narayanan for Petr. Mr S.K.Talsania i/b Motiwala & Co for Respt CORAM CORAM CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J : D.G. KARNIK, J : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED DATED DATED : 13th July 2005. : 13th July 2005. : 13th July 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that about 5 employees employed in the canteen after the cut-off date and who were similarly situated with that the petitioner have been regularised in the employment of the respondent. The petitioner has been 2 discriminated. Since this is not a petition filed under Article 14 of the Constitution of India learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file appropriate petition on the ground of discrimination. Leave granted. Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as above. D.G.KARNIK,