HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.V. SANJAY KUMAR W.A.M.P.NO:1649 OF 2008. & WRIT APPEAL NO : 1588 of 2001 JUDGMENT: ( Per the Honourable Smt Justice T. Meena Kumari) Aggrieved by the Order, in W.P.No.11443 of 2001 dated 24.8.2001, the petitioner has preferred this appeal. Originally, the writ petition was ﬁled seeking to declare the action of the 1st respondent in issuing the proceedings dated 15.2.2000 as illegal and arbitrary and to issue a consequential direction to the 1st respondent to declare the results of the petitioner in the examination held in the month of April, 2000. According to the writ petitioner, he appeared for MCA 3rd year examination in April, 2000 from S.R.E.S. College, Tanuku and on 23.9.2000, an explanation was called for alleging that he was found copying the answers from another candidate. The petitioner submitted his explanation and appeared before the 1st respondent on 31.1.2001 and submitted further details of his academic career. But, the 1st respondent, without considering the explanation, issued the impugned proceedings cancelling the result of the petitioner. Though applications were made before the 2nd respondent on 27.2.2001 & 10.3.2001 seeking mercy, no orders were passed. It is also the case of the petitioner that one K. Krishna Hymavathi had indulged in similar malpractice as that of him, but the proceedings against her were dropped after her explanation. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents and perused the material available on record. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant has ﬁled the above M.P seeking to receive the documents as mentioned in the annexure for better appreciation of the facts. Since other side has no objection, the said M.P is ordered. On a perusal of the material on record ﬁled along with the M.P, it is apparent that though the committee cancelled the result of examination held in April, 2000, but it has permitted the candidates, whose results were cancelled, to appear for the same examination in the year 2001. Accordingly, the petitioner appeared and failed in all the subjects. Now, it is the contention of the petitioner that he appeared for the examination conducted in October, 2007 and he passed the M.C.A., but however, the proceedings impugned in the writ petition would cause a stigma to him and his entire career would be spoiled and therefore, even at this juncture, if the mercy applications made by the petitioner on 27.2.2001 & 10.3.2001 are considered, the petitioner would be able to secure a better career. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the fact that the petitioner appeared for the examination in the year 2007 and succeeded and in order to safeguard the future career of the petitioner and to meet the ends of justice, we feel it a ﬁt case wherein a direction can be issued to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 27.2.2001 & 10.3.2001. Accordingly, the 2 nd respondent-Registrar, Andhra University, is directed to consider the representations of the petitioner, dated 27.2.2001 & 10.3.2001 and pass orders in accordance with law. With the above observation, the writ appeal is disposed of. WAMP is ordered accordingly. _______________________ Justice T.Meenakumari _________________________ Justice P.V. Sanjay Kumar Dated: 12.8.2008 Nn/gurc. HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.V. SANJAY KUMAR WAMP No.1649 of 2008 & WRIT APPEAL NO : 1588 of 2001 (Judgment of the Division Bench delivered by the Honourable Smt Justice T. Meena Kumari) 12th August, 2008