IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.628 of 2010 ANIL YADAV @ ANIL SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 24.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. There is case and counter case for the incident of the same day. Mining by blast is opposed as the same was illegally done and in that course, alleged firing was shot injuring the informant while the claim is made that the petitioner was licence holder, his act was opposed and in that course there was firing from the side of the informant which hit two persons. This much goes to show use of force by both if really petitioner was licence holder, he has right to blast the mining and that was being opposed on any ground, law should not be taken in his own to obstruct the hindrance. Any how petitioner’s firing has hit the informant on his vital part though simple in nature but not entitling for anticipatory bail. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Petitioner is directed to surrender and move for regular bail. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)