A.- ^•^-•3^^ flMJTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 2>orc,| Qp 2005 PETITIONER (S): ^'i- ..•^..•c'y .,. .\'>c3^^ ^^:^ ^f^^ .<^1 '^^ u"' .J-; Pramod Kumar Singh, S/o- Shri Devnath Singh, Aged About- 21 Years, R/o- Near Bus Stand Village- Janakapur, Distt. -Koria (C.G.) JS.. Ajay Kumar Singh, S/o- Shri Kundan Lal Singh, Aged About- 21 Years, R/o- Near High School Village-Janakapur,Distt.-Koria(C.G.) ^ 3: Smt. Santosh Singh, W/o- Shri ^ Nagendra Singh, Aged About- 25 -•' Years, R/o- Near Primary School, Village-Janakapur,Distt. -Koria (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT (Sl: K ^\Ks!^[^^ , ;? '^•^^ I i;iia" // 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through it's Secretaiy Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. State of Chhattisgarh : Through it's Secretary Department of Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 3. Collector Distt-Koria (C.G.) 4. District Education Offi.cer Distt-Koria (C.G.) 5. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Bharatpur Distt-Koria (C.G.) 6. Janpad Panchayat, Through It's President Janpad Panchayat, Bharatpur Distt-Koria (C.G.) B• ^ ./' ^RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/22'7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF I1!1DIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF N(MNDAMUS_/_CEKnQRAKLETC, _OR_ DIRECT!QN_ ]_ QRDER^N_TJIE LL-T?,NATURE. • •s XB1 311 •' i! SB ^y^' il ^. ai l^;i1 aa BS^S "ffi-'? B' tSSl ii 1 XI-HC-78 d-OTi'^lKjirt^, yTil<(i'li(o, firtl'dy'i *ii*irii a?*n<» ^;.P;..."l.oZi SIT^ST q^P (ifffg^S) ^F^200^ OT^STWi^litR ?PIT9TI^9Ta?qra5 s'RiraRwfer 3ir^?r_ Sbri Viuay Pandey, coun^ Shri Akhfl Agrawal, Pane|l No. 1 to 4. This is an applicatiou bf i^rgent hearing. The inatter is taken UD on Board. The apptication stands d^ filed dateld By fhis writ petition, Constitutiou of India, fhe peti1|ic writ of cerdorari for 18/ Shiksha/Ja.Pa. /2005 candidates have beeu selectedl chatlenge has beeu inade on tU process of selection. Leamed that the petitioners would have due to the fault m fh.e selected. They are claiming fhe better caiididatures thaa fhe t aufhorities through fhe aforesa(d It is subinitted by leame4 selection is govemed by Pradesh(Chhattisgarh) Paach^ and Couditions ofServices) selection 'pi<ifn<Ili tiifn)'^' faid •(lul'l-^l-t ^31^i*I3IT^?T el for fhe petitioners. Lawyer for the State/ ndents sposed of. under Article 226/227 of fhe ioners have pi-ayed for issuance of ishing the selection list No. 4.6.2005 by which nuinber of as Sfaiksha Kanni Grade-III. The e ground of procedural fault ui the •ounsel for fhe petitioners subniits been selected on the said post but, procedure, they could uot be selection, saytng fhat they haye fhe persons selected by fhe concenied process ofselection. cotuisel for the petitiouers that ttie tne provisioas of Macthya .vat Shiksha Karmis(Recruitaient 'i.-/lt -:?' SP, ,«> vd-CT) '-qi<llc'i<4,,lWl1tt<ld, Rlriil'Hy'; sn^sT'ratp (lyijci.g) lfe;(f<p awail^naiHi* gCTTSR^tfer an^si <t>i<ifn<ili *i]<i«'i"^r'fei^l^fu|'(tiK ^si^Tan^ffl.- p'TOti Rt I have gone through th^ Riiles provides for aa appeal Rules. Learaed counsel for the a provision of appeal ia die altemative reiaedv is available Coasideruig Ihe facts considering fhe grpunds rais) opiaioa that fhe alteraati.ve efficacious to decide fh.e dispi writ petition, therefore, I am) petition at this stage. If so desired, the petitioi provided under Rule 12 ofthe if such aa appeal is filed by autliority, the appeUate authoi^ a period of 3 inonths from. fh| Rules. Rlile 12 of the aforesaid ^aiast fhe oider passed uilder these ag; li>etitioners also subxnits fhat tiiere is Riiles itself and iu fhis nianner, aa ^o the petitioners. afad circuinstauces of fhe case and id by fhe petitione^ I am. of the re^aedy available to fhe petitioners is ^ites raised by thein by way of fhis not uicluied to entertam fhis writ >i|iers inay avail fhe reinedy of appeal laforesaid Rules. It is observed fhat the petitiouers Uefore the appellate 'fty shaU. dispose of the appeal withiti date of filuig of fhe appeal before Wifh fhe aforesaid ob| disposed ofat this stage. Consequently, M.W.P.Nc) ervations, tbis petition is finaUy 2576/2005 stands disposed of. Certi&ed copy as per rul^s. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge