^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BILASPUR D.B.: HON?BLE Mr. JUSTICE SUNIL KUJVIAR SINHA & HQN'BLEVr.JUSTICERADHESHYAMS^ APPELLANT RESPONDENTS 1 WRETAPPEAL N0.489/2911 Jai Mata Mahi!a Swa Sahayata Samooh Chakapendra, Biock Navagarh, District Durg (C.G.) Through !ts President, Smt. Shlmala Bai, W/o Shri Janak Ram, aged about 5 years, R/o Viilage Chakapendra, Biock Navagarh, District Durg (C.G.) Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Food and Civi! Supplies, Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) The CoJiector, Durg, DistrEct Durg (C.G.) The Sub Divisional Officer (R) Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2(1) OF THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATT8SGARH (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCHlACT. 2006 Apeearance: Mr. Sanjay Patei, Counsel for the appeliant. Mr. A.S.Kachhwaha, Dy. Advocate General for the State/respondents on advance copy. ^RALORDER (31.10.2011) The foilowing order of the Court was passed by Suni! Kumar Stnha. J. Heard. Being aggrieved with the order dated 19.09.2011 passed in W.P.(C) No.5537/2011, by the tearned Single Judge of this Court, the appeilant/petitioner has fiied thls appeai. /^^i .:;^:-rt7«-^ ^•'^%I^N^ ^:.^:^s^ •^ \..^^y ^7 WRIT APPEAL N0.489/2011 The appeEtant/petitioner-Society was runnlng a FaEr Price Shop. On account of certaln trregularlty, a show cause notlce was Issued to the appellant on 18.08.2011 and the appeliant was cal!ed upon to fiie repiy on 24.08.2011. it appears that even after service of notice, no one appeared cn behaif of the appeilant before the concerned authority on 24.08.2011, therefore, the concerned authority passed an order for canceliation of the Fair Prlce Shop of the appeliant. !t was argued before the iearned Singie Judge that appropriate opportunity of hearing was not provided to the appeilant. The iearned Single Judge refemng to the provisions of Ciause 16 of the Chhattisgarh Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2004 held that a show cause notice was issued to the appeilant, but no one appeared on behaif of t'ne appeilant on the date fixed for hearing, therefore, there was no vlolation of the princlples of naturai justice. The learned Singie Judge further he!d that it was not pieaded by the appellant-Society that prejudice had been caused to the appeilant-Society by not hearing it before passing the Impugned order. The learned Singie Judge, therefore, dismissed the writ petition. After going through the entire facts and circumstances of the case and considering the provisions of Clause 16 of the Chhattisgarh Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2004, we do not find any iiiegaiity or irreguiarity in the impugned order passed by the iearned Single Judge, whereby, the writ petltion fiied bythe appeiiant/petitloner was dlsmissed. The writ appeal, therefore, is liabie to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. shyna Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- R.S. Sharma Judge