IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Rev. No.442 of 2011 Date of Decision: 27.05.2011 Rajender Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Smt. Raj Kumari ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a revision petition against the order dated 20.11.2010 passed by the District Judge, Family Court, Faridabad, vide which, the interim maintenance of ` 1000/- has been granted to the respondent-wife. The matter was adjourned on 22.02.2011 to enable the learned counsel for the petitioner to place on record the evidence to show that the respondent-wife is working. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to get any evidence to show that the respondent-wife is working. In view of the above, the present revision petition is dismissed being devoid of merits. ` 1000/- is hardly enough to sustain herself. No other argument was raised. Dismissed accordingly. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 27.05.2011 JUDGE gurpreet