Crl. Misc. No. M-34922 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-34922 of 2009 Date of Decision: December 17, 2009 Kuldeep Singh … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present : Mr. G.N.Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Arshvinder Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ****** S.D. Anand, J. The interim bail plea of the petitioner came to be rejected by the Court of Sessions on the premise that the petitioner had not been cooperative in the matter of investigation, that he had not intimated his correct address to the investigating officer and that he had not furnished proper sureties to the satisfaction of the investigating officer. In the light of the averments made in the course of para No.4 of the impugned order, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner did cooperate in the matter of investigation, that he did intimate his correct address to the investigating officer and that he was in a position to furnish proper sureties to the satisfaction of the investigating officer. Learned counsel for the petitioner concedes that a presentation about the correct factual position was not made to Crl. Misc. No. M-34922 of 2009 -2- the Court of Sessions in a documented form. He states that the needful shall be done, if an opportunity is afforded for it. He requests for interim protection. In the light thereof, the petitioner is relegated to the remedy available to him before the learned Court of Sessions to the above indicated extent. The needful may be done in the form of a documented presentation on 22.12.2009. The State shall also enter appearance before the Court of Sessions on that date in the context of the presentation aforementioned. The petitioner shall not be arrested till 22.12.2009. Disposed of accordingly. December 17, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vinod Judge