1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No.604 of 2010 (Ab Aleem Deshmukh and others v. Tarnnum w/o Ab. Aleem Deshmukh and another) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri S.B. Ruikar, Advocate, holding for Shri S.V. Sirpurkar, Advocate, for Applicants. Shri S.O. Ahmed, Advocate, holding for Shri S.D. Chopde, Advocate, for Respondents. Coram : R.M. Borde, J. Dated : 6 th July, 2010 The applicants are raising exception to the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.5, Akola, on 15-8-2008 dismissing the complaint presented under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Section 29 of the said Act provides for alternate remedy. In view of this, the instant application is not maintainable. The application, therefore, stands rejected as not maintainable. Liberty to the applicant to avail of alternate remedy as may be available in law. Judge. Later on : Shri S.V. Sirpurkar, learned counsel for the applicants, 2 appears. He contended that the challenge in this application is not restricted to the order passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.5, Akola, but the same is in respect of initiation of proceedings at the instance of the wife itself. It is to be noted that the complaint presented by the wife under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act is itself dismissed. It is contended that the another complaint is already presented before the Court at Balapur after dismissal of the earlier complaint by the Judicial Magistrate First Class. It would be open for the applicant to raise appropriate objections before the Court before which the second complaint is pending and if such objections are raised, it would be obligatory on the part of the Trial Magistrate to deal with such objections. Judge. pdl.