C.R NO. 1534 OF 2005 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R NO. 1534 OF 2005 DECIDED ON : 15.04.2009 Siri Krishan ...Petitioner versus Bharta and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT Present : Mr. Sandeep Ghangas, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. S. Tacoria, Advocate, for the respondents. SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 16.02.2005 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Panipat, whereby order dated 15.12.2004 of learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Panipat, granting ad- interim injunction to the petitioner, has been partly set aside. While issuing notice of motion, this Court vide order dated 17.03.2005 stayed the operation of impugned order dated 16.02.2005. Thereafter, the following order was passed while admitting the revision petition on 03.11.2006 : C.R NO. 1534 OF 2005 -2- “ Admitted. In the meantime, the respondents are restrained from interfering in the possession of the plaintiff over the land in dispute which is being used as Pooja Sathal of his forefathers.” It would, thus, be seen that the interim order passed by this court is operating in petitioner's favour from the last over three years. Meanwhile, the suit itself might be near to final disposal. Under these circumstance when both the parties have reconciled with the interim arrangement made by this Court, I do not deem it necessary to go into the rival contentions which may unnecessarily prejudice any one of them in the pending suit. Rather, the revision petition is disposed of with a direction that the interim order dated 03.11.2006 passed by this Court shall continue to operate till the civil suit is decided. However, keeping in view the nature of lis, the learned Civil Court is directed to make an endeavour to dispose of the pending suit within a period of six months. Disposed of. APRIL 15, 2009 (SURYA KANT) shalini JUDGE