A—i—i-:A—£S3^M^assi.t3sa^ .^ ^' -^ IN -IHE HIGH COURT QF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPT® WRIT PETITION N0. f/7; OF 2001 ^fer PETITIONER .^^ f-t^' ^\G^ ^?7 ,^..- ^ RESPONDEHT $~ f^attouraiR Agrawal» Son of ShrJL Gopiram Agrawal^ Aged about 70 years, Resident of Gandhiganj, Raigarh (Ctohattisgarh). VER S U S s-(l) The State of Chhattisgarh fltirou^: Department of urban Developaent and Adrainistration, Raigarti, ca'ihattisgarh, PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 QFTHE CONSTFTUTION OF INDIA_ UKK"»t COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT PETiTION N0.1178 OF 2001 (^) Petitioner Mathuram Agrawal Versus Respondent Tne State of Chhattisgarh WRIT PETiTION UNDER ARTiCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF INDiA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri B.D.Guru, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panei La'^vyer forthe State/ respondent. (ORAL) (Passed on 02nd day of August, 2010) -^; ^r 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition on the ground that the petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 2. 11 Is ordered, as prayed for. 3. Accordlngiy, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok