IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 4246 of 2009 Date of Decision: 30.7.2009 Saroj Rani ....Petitioner. Versus Raj Dulai and another ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. M.K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought for setting aside of the order dated 28.5.2009 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Patiala, whereby the application filed by her for framing an issue has been dismissed. A perusal of the order impugned herein shows that the similar issue, i.e. “whether property is not partible and defendant are in possession over the entire property since 1994 “ had earlier been raised by the petitioner. The trial court has recorded that the said issue was decided in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants. It has further been recorded that it is only the Local Commissioner who had to suggest the mode of partition and thereafter the court had to make opinion after hearing both the parties that whether the property is partible or not. The trial court also observed that said application CR No. 4246 of 2009 -2- appears to have been filed only to delay the proceedings. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the record, no ground to exercise jurisdiction by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is made out. Dismissed. July 30, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE