IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-3312 of 2009 Date of decision:15.10.2009. Gurchet Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Anil Kumar Garg, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. B.B.S.Teji, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Anshuman Chopra, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioners and respondent No.2 have compounded the offences and have placed on record documented compromise, which may be read as Annexure P-2. Petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2, who are father and son inter-se, are present in the Court and are identified by their respective counsel. Petitioner No.2, who is not present in Court, is wife of petitioner No.1 and daughter-in-law of respondent No.2. They own up the compounding. They further state that presently there is no dispute subsisting between them. Their joint statement has also been recorded separately. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.72 dated 08.06.2008, under Sections 452, 325, 323, 34 IPC, P.S. Malerkotla, District Sangrur (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed on account of compounding. Disposed of accordingly. October 15, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE