-.1. ^ RESPQNDENTS COURT OF CH HATT1SGARH AT B 1 LASPU R WRIT PETIT10N (S) No_,6869_Qf 2006 Rahaslila Kashyap, Son of Shri Ganga Dayal Kashyap, Aged about 45 years, Assistant Teacher, Government Middle School Pacheda, Block Nawagarh, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisaarh Through the Secretary, Department of Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. DirecSor of Public Snstruction, Raipur 3. The District Education Officer, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4. The Block Education Officer, Block Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUITON OF INDIA Present: Shri Ashwani Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri An/ind Dubey, Panel Lav^er for the State/respondents. (Passed on 24'" day of June,2009) Heard. The petitioner was appointed as Deputy Teacher on a 300/-. After completion of his probation period, he was pay of Rs. ranted reaular pay scale. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue Involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioner is entitied to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or after compietion of probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State ' AdmimSrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu ,.an.a 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein it was held that the ^ilarly situated teachers sre entitled to regular pay scaie w.e.f. the date .> of initia! apDointment. The matter was taken up to Hon'ble Supreme t^Ss- Court in Special Leave Petition (Civit) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitted to reguiar pay scale from date of initial appointment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also submits that this court, whiie considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh S others [W.P. (S) No. 4725/2006] by order dated .09.2006, ailowed the petitioners to mate a representation along with copy ofthe petition and annexures within a period often days, raising all their grievances and in turn the concerned respondent was directed to decide the representation in an objective manner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the representation. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted iiberty to make a representation raising al! his grievances and in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, subject to veriTication of the facts. 6. In view of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Amit