IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No : 13819 of 2001 BETWEEN: K.N,M. Rao, E - 726518, Macherla Depot, s/o. Pitchaiah, r/o. Tadigadapa, Penamaluru (M), Krishna Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Guntur Region, Guntur District. 3 The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Macherla Depot, Guntur Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents here in disengaging his petitioner service vide Proc. No. P2/255(03)/2001, dt. 30.06.2001, without following any due process of law, instead of regularizing petitioner services though he has completed nearly 423 days of service, as illegal, and unjust, arbitrary and as such liable to be set aside in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.S.M.SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondents: C.PRAKASH REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following : ORDER : It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that during the pendency of the writ petition, the services of the petitioner were re-engaged and he was regularized in the post of Conductor. In that view of the matter, it is submitted that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 2nd December 2008 ajr