IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 18TH JULY 2008 / 27TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 7614 of 2005(F) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- E.A.THOMAS, EERALY HOUSE, ANGAMALY EAST, CONVENOR OF THE COMMITTEE CONSTITUTED UNDER THE PEOPLE' PLAN PROGRAMME FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF URGENT TEMPORARY SAND BUND ACROSS PERIYAR RIVER IN KALADY PANCHAYAT, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA, ADV. SRI.K.I.SAGEER IBRAHIM. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 2. KALADY GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE KALADY GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KALADY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KALADY. 4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION SECTION, KALADY. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. NOBLE MATHEW FOR R1, R3 & R4, ADV. SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW FOR R2. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.7614/2005-F: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO. 414/97 (4)/DPO DTD. 18/04/2002 OF THE R.1. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 11/03/2003 SENT BY THE ASST. ENGINEER, MVIP SECTION 317, MUVATTUPUZHA TO THE R.3. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 26/05/2003 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.3. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 14/08/2003 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.2. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 19/10/2003 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.3. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 17/05/2004 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.2. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 14/08/2004 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.3. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// prv. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.7614 of 2005 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 18th July, 2008. J U D G M E N T In the matter of payment of bills, in case the petitioner has still any grievance left, he may approach the second respondent, or work out the relief before the civil court. In case the petitioner opts for the latter course, the time taken for prosecuting this writ petition shall stand excluded in computing the period of limitation. The writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.7614 of 2005 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 18th July, 2008.