IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.3930 OF 2009 Between: Thameem Baig & 2 others … PETITIONERS And The State of A.P. & another … RESPONDENTS This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.3930 OF 2009 ORDER: 1. Grievance of the petitioners 1 to 5/A1 and A3 to A6 is that on the same allegations contained in F.I.R.No.59 of 2009, on the file of Pedana Police Station, the second respondent/de facto complainant gave another report and it was registered as Crime No.62 of 2007 of Pedana Police Station who after investigation, filed charge sheet in the Court of Judicial Magistrate of the I Class, Special Mobile Court, Machilipatnam, as C.C.No.162 of 2007. But C.C.No.162 of 2007 relates to offence punishable under Section 498A read with 34 I.P.C. Whereas, the present case in Crime No.59 of 2009 was registered under Section 406 I.P.C. Ingredients of both the penal sections are totally different. So, it cannot be said that registration of the second report is abuse of process of law. 2. Hence, the criminal petition is dismissed. However, the police are directed not to arrest A3, A4 and A6 till completion of investigation and filing of charge sheet. ______________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J August 13, 2010 KL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.3930 OF 2009 August 13, 2010 KL