HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR DIVISIONBENCH 1« CORAM: HON'BLESHRIRAJEEVGUPTA.C.J.& HON'BLESHRlRftNGNATH©HANDRAKAR,J. ^' •^' €> Apolicant Appeilant Non-aDDlicants Respondents I.C.C.No.397of2010 Nand Kumar S/o Dhanwar Singh Nishad, aged about 25 years, R/o 1-abour colony, Nandgahiyapara, near Durga Mandir Zone-J, Khursipar, Bhilai, P.S. Pulgaon, distt. Durg(C.G.) VERSUS 1; Radheshyam S/o Banthulal Dewangan R^ Contractor Cplony, 5 Road, Samta Nagar, Supela, Bhilai Tahsil & district Durg (C.G.) 2. Shyam Sunder Heliwal S/o. S.M. Heliwal, R/o Shanti Nagar, Bhilai, Tahsil&DistrictDui^(C.G.) 3 National Insurance Company Ltd. Gili Complex, Gurudwara Road, DurgTahsil&DistriCtDui^(C.G.) AopljcatiQn for restoration of appeal , Present: Shri 1. P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. ORDER (4th August, 20-10) The following order of the Court was passed by RajeevGupta,C.J. Shri 1.P. Singh; learned counsel; fbr the petitioner js heard on tHe restoration petition. m 2) The petitioner isseeking restoration of M.A. No.1146/2004, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 22.Q7.201:Q.::::.';',:.:.:'':,'\'':.':.'!:'';-^ . 1:'' : : : 3) On due cqnsicieratiQn of the submissions of learned eounsel forthe petitionerand thegroundstakenjntl'ierestoration petition, we are satisfied that the absence of the petitioner's counselon 22.07,2010 when M.A. No.1146/2004 was taken-up fcrhearingwasbasedonBoRaflGfegrounds. 4) M.C.C.No.397y2010, therefore, is allowed and M.A.Np.1146/2004 jsjestoredjajtsoFiginalnumber. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd;- R.N. Chandrakar Judge