IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 12105 of 2008. Decided on: 30th December, 2010. Sita Ram. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 4. : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. None for respondent No. 5. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that since he has been engaged by the Village Education Committee in July, 1998, his services could not be terminated. It is evident from the policy framed by the respondent-State that only those Part Time Workers were given the benefit, who have either been appointed by the Gram Panchayat or on the basis of the resolution passed by the P.T.A.. Since the petitioner has been appointed by the Village Education Committee, his case is not covered under the instant rules. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 30, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. - 2 - - 3 -