1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 2079 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 886 OF 2006 Asha Kumar Kulkarni ... Petitioner v/s State of Maharashtra & anr. ... Respondents Mr.A.V.Anturkar i/by Mr.S.G.Deshmukh for the petitioner. Mr.A.M.Joshi for respondent No.4. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 16TH APRIL, 2010 P.C.: 1. The review petition has been filed on the ground that there is a mistake committed by the advocate while applying for withdrawal of the writ petition on 25.10.2007. The learned advocate for the petitioner places reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Board of Control for Cricket in India & anr. v/s Netaji Cricket Club & ors., reported in (2005) 4 SCC 741, more specifically para 90. He points out that if the advocate has committed a mistake, the Court should consider the matter 2 and review its earlier order. 2. In my opinion, no case for review has been made out by the petitioner. There is no averment contained in the petition that the petitioner had instructed her advocate not to withdraw the petition or that she or her advocate were unaware of the consequences of the withdrawal of the petition. 3. In these circumstances, the review petition stands dismissed. ..... 3