W E1G__ COURT OF CHIiATTISGAliI—I AT BILASPUR ‘WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 2838 of 2007 U) la_ RESPG‘NDENTS PETITIONERS : 1. Ku. Margret Tirkey, Aged about 43 years, Daughter of Late Johan Tirkey, Head Mistress, St; Jeseph’s Primary Schoal Darridih, P0. Balrampur, District Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.) 2. K11, Virginia Kujure Aged about 62 years, Daughter of Late Joseph Kujur, Assistant Teacheg St, Joseph’s Primary School Darridih, P.O. Balrampur, District Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.) . Ku. Mary Lakra, Aged about 30 years, Daughter of Shri Robert Lakrai Assistant Teacher, St. Joseph’s Primary Schooi Darridih, RO Balrampur, District Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.) VERSUS r State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya DK§ Bhawaa Raipur (Chhattisgarh): 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, District Sarguja, Ambikapur (Chhattisgarh) 3, Catholic Sansthan Surguja, Uttar Purb Parikshetra, Bishop’s House, Ambikapur through Nirdeshaig Bishop’s House, Ariibikapur (C.G.). WT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TEE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Single Bench : Hon’ble Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. Present: Shri Anupam Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Alvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the Stater’respondents 1 & 2. ORDER \raESEu (n ,1 011 orh 0‘ day Cu :11 wra'y’, 40v n (\Fn I ) The question of law involved in this petition is whether the teachers working in government aided private schoois are entitled to the benefit of the recommendation of the Fiith Pay Commission under the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Sikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha / Anya Karmcha-riyon Ke Vetno Ka Sandaya) Adhiniyam, 1978 (henceforth ‘the Adhiniyam, 1978’) and the rules made ihereunder read with the Madhya Pradesh Revision of ?ay Ruieg 1998 (henceforth ‘the Pay Rules, 1998’). The identicai question of law was considered by this Court in batch of matters i.e. Smt. ALall Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others (WP. No. 4108 of 2005) with other connected matters. and the same was disposed ofby judgment and order dated 6.2.2007. It was held that the petitioners who are working in fully Government aided private schools are entitled to the revised pay scales w.e.f 1.1.1996 as prescribed under the Pay Rules, 1998. This Court had granted certain directions further for the purpose of disbursement of arrears. Admittedly and jointly, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that this matter is squarely covered by the judgnent and order dated 6.2.2007 passed by this Court in the case of Smt. ALall Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others and other connected matters (Supra). As a result, for the reasons stated in the judgnent and order dated 6.2.2007 passed in WP. No. 4108 of 2005 Smt. A.Lall Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Gthers and other connected matters (supra), the writ petition is allowed in the same terms and conditions. ""’-’/—‘-’——’-‘/‘ ‘7 sw— i Satish K.Agnihotri ‘ Judge ‘/ l i