COCP No. 1592 of 2010 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1592 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.8.2010 Raj Singh and another .....Petitioners Versus Mahant Sukhdev Muni and another ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Suresh Goel, Advocate, for the petitioners. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) The grievance of the present petitioners is that the settlement arrived at between the parties in the earlier contempt proceedings, has been violated by the respondents. Particular reference was made to the following clause of the said settlement:- “(i) The petitioner, Mahant Sukhdev Muni shall be entitled to offer cultivable land, belonging to the Dera, on an yearly contract, with the prior concurrence and under supervision of Sh. Paramjit Singh Padda, PCS, SDM, Barnala.” COCP No. 1592 of 2010 (O&M) [2] The averments made in the contempt petition are that Mahant Sukhdev Muni, has not leased out the property of the Dera with prior concurrence and under the supervision of SDM, Barnala and rather leased out the same to some unknown person, who is now in cultivating possession of the property and the amount recovered has not been deposited in the Nationalised Bank. The averments made in the contempt petition are totally vague. The petitioners have not disclosed the name of the person to whom the land has been leased out and that such lease is without the concurrence and supervision of the SDM, Barnala. In view of the said fact, I do not find that any case is made out for initiation of the contempt proceedings. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. [HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 16.8.2010 ds