IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 4017 of 2011 Date of Decision : April 07, 2011 Union of India and others ....Petitioners Versus Devi Dass and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S.MANN Present : Mr. Ashwinie Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. G.S.Bal, Advocate for respondent No.1. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.KUMAR, J. 1. The instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution is directed against the order dated 11.8.2010 passed by the Chandigarh Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal directing the appellants to examine the request of the respondent for grant of temporary status and regularization as per Scheme, if any, framed by them. The aforesaid request was required to be examined in the light of the decision rendered by the Principal Bench in Original application No. CWP No. 4017 of 2011 -2- 1161 of 2002 titled as All India CPW (MRM) Karamchari Sangathan (Regd.) and others v. Union of India and others decided on 17.12.2003. 2. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for respondent No.1 has produced before us a copy of order dated 4.3.2011 (mark A) now passed by the appellants vide which the claim made by the original applicant-respondent has been declined. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered view that no interference is called for in the direction issued by the Tribunal particularly when the order itself has been complied with. Even otherwise, the direction issued by the Tribunal was innocuous. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of having been rendered as infructuous. However, the original applicant-respondent would be at liberty to challenge the order dated 4.3.2011 (mark A) in accordance with law. ( M.M.KUMAR ) JUDGE ( T.P.S.MANN ) April 07, 2011 JUDGE ajay-I