ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO. 853 OF 2003 NO. 853 OF 2003 NO. 853 OF 2003 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1261 OF 2003 PETITION NO. 1261 OF 2003 PETITION NO. 1261 OF 2003 Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. & Anr. ...Appellants. Vs. J.A.Lopez and Anr. ...Respondents. Mr.C.U.Singh, Sr.Advocate i/by M/s. Haresh Mehta & Co. for the Appellants. Ms.Tavadia for Respondent No.1. CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 21ST FEBRUARY, 2008 : 21ST FEBRUARY, 2008 : 21ST FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Mentioned. Not on board. 2. Heard the learned Senior counsel for the Appellants and the learned counsel for Respondent No.1. Respondent No.1 has filed an affidavit dated 6th February, 2008 and is also personally present before this Court. We have perused the same. For the reasons stated in the said affidavit, Respondent No.1 seeks leave to withdraw the Complaint (ULP) No.853 of 1992 pending before the Industrial Court, Mumbai. Leave granted to withdraw the Complaint. The learned counsel for Respondent No.1 undertakes that within a ( 2 ) period of two weeks, the said Complaint will be withdrawn before the Industrial Court. Upon such withdrawal, the present Appeal shall also stand disposed of. We make it very clear that this withdrawal/disposal of the Appeal will not come in the way of Industrial Court Mumbai for disposing of the pending Complaint ULP No.572 of 2001 in accordance with law. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)