IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3519 of 2008 Kiran Devi, wife of Ramesh Paswan, village Sindhiya Khurd, PS and district Samastipur – Petitioner. Vs. 1) The State of Bihar through the District Officer, Samastipur. 2) The Dist. Welfare Officer, Samastipur. 3) The Block Dev. Officer, Samastipur. 4) The Child Dev. Officer, Block Samastipur. 5) Prawechhika, Block Samastipur, district Samastipur. 6) Mukhiya of Sindhiya Khurd Panchayat, Samastipur. 7) Panchayat Sachiv, Sindhiya Khurd Panchayat, Samastipur – Respondents. 3 19.4.2011 The petitioner was selected in the year 2007 for the post of Aanganbari Sevika in Centre No. 170 situated in Ward No. 5 in Sindhiya Khurd Panchayat under Mufassil police station in the district of Samastipur. The appointment of the petitioner was issued. However, she was not permitted to join on the ground that her appointment was made against the guide lines issued in 2006, inasmuch as it has been stated that father of the petitioner was a village Chowkidar. This aspect of the matter is covered by the judgment of this court delivered in CWJC No. 12911/2007 (Sunita Kumari vs. The State of Bihar and others), disposed of on 6.5.2010. Till today no further appointment has been made at Centre 170 in Sindhiya Khurd Panchayat. In the circumstances it would be proper that a fresh selection should be made in which the petitioner’s case should be considered in view of the 2010 guide lines. It would, thus, be proper for the authorities to take steps to make appointment within six months considering the fact 2 that the appointment of Aanganbari Sevika is made to give benefits to the under privileged women and children. This writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid direction. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)