BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fourth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.S.KARNAN CRL OP(MD) No.12811 of 2011 S.RENUGADEVI : PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALANGANALLUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.DEENADAYALAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr. C. RAMESH Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code in Crime No.247 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant in his case viz., S.Santhanaga Sethupathy executed a power of attorney to the first accused on 10/1/2011 to sell his land. He sold the property to the petitioner through A.2. The defacto complainant alleged that his lands were grabbed by all these accused. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence. He further submitted that the petitioner will not abscond or evade any due process of law and he never tamper with the witnesses and hence, she has come forwarded with this application for bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor seeks for the dismissal of the anticipatory bail petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. In view of the facts and circumstances of this case and arguments advanced by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of her arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate-cum-Munsif Court, Vadipatti, Madurai District, and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police as and when required. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. 7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 04/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CUM MUNSIF, VADIPATTI, MADURAI DISTRICT. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALANGANALLUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. R.DEENADAYALAN Advocate SR.No.34864 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12811 of 2011 Date :04/10/2011 NSV/7.10.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/