IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5984 of 2007 REEM KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 03.07.2008 Learned counsel is permitted to implead the Commissioner, Saran Division as Respondent no. 13. After some argument, learned counsel prays for leave to withdraw the writ application confining his relief to the only submission for appropriate direction to Respondent no. 13 to dispose off his representation at Annexure-9 on merits. The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. The issue of ineligibility of the petitioner to any relief on a claim of the year 2005, in view of the coming into force of the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teachers (Appointment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2006, on 1.7.2006 is one aspect of the matter, and the illegality of an earlier appointment in pursuance of which a person may have had the benefit of permanency as a Panchayat Shikhak under Rule 20 is another aspect of the matter. The two cannot be mixed up. The latter survives independent of the former. The representation of the petitioner at Anneuxre-9 to that extent is directed to be disposed off in accordance with law within three months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order after hearing all concerned. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)