IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16160 of 2009 1. CHANDESWAR PAL S/O SRI RAM LAKHAN PAL R/O VILL.- TORIHARI, P.S.- LAUKHA AND DISTT.- MADHUBANI 2. . null Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE SECRETARY BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD (HIGHER SECONDARY), PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR(ACADEMIC) BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD (HIGHER SECONDARY), PATNA 4. SRI MANI LAL SAH, THE SECRETARY OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE GANDHI AMBEDKAR JANTA COLLEGE TORIYAHI, LALMUNIA, DISTT.- MADHUBANI 5. THE PROFESSOR-IN-CHARGE, GANDHI AMBEDKAR JANTA COLLEGE, TORIYAHI, LALMUNIA, DISTT.- MADHUBANI ----------- 3 17.3.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner, counsel appearing for Bihar School Examination Board, the State as well as counsel representing respondent nos.4 and 5. Petitioner’s prayer is for quashing letters dated 25.9.2009 issued by Secretary of the Governing Body- Respondent no.4, terminating his service from the post of Head Clerk of the College and also to direct the respondent nos. 2 and 3 not to approve the list of teaching and non teaching staff dated 23.11.2002 relating to Gandhi Ambedkar Jatna College, Toriyahi, Lalmunia, 2 Madhubani. Petitioner’s case is that for the first time he came to know about his termination through letter dated 25.9.2009. On perusal of Annexures 4 and 4/1, it transpires that termination letters had been issued long time back and these letters in fact are not termination letters. These letters are communication to the petitioner in respect of a land donated by the father of the petitioner to the College, for which demand was made by the petitioner. Counsel representing the Governing Body of the College and the Principal of the College had taken a decision to terminate service of the petitioner in the year 1995 itself on account of his involvement in financial irregularity and other corrupt activities. Considering the submissions made on behalf of respondent nos. 4 and 5, the present writ application cannot be entertained 3 as after very long gap, the petitioner has come before this Court praying for the quashing of the letter of termination. This application is accordingly dismissed. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.kumar