1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5654 OF 2011. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Mr.V.D.Sapkal, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Vijay Sharma, advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J. Date : 12.09.2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. Mr.Sapkal, learned counsel contends that the application filed by the present Respondent No.2 for addition of party does not spell out the rights of the present Respondent No.2 being affected and in absence thereof the Respondent No.2 could not have been added as a party. 3. The Respondent No.2 has filed affidavit-in-reply to the present petition. Perusal of the application filed by the Respondent No.2 for addition of the party does not give the particulars of his interest being involved in the suit property and the right being 2 affected. In light of that, Mr.Sharma, learned counsel for Respondent No.2 on instructions of the Respondent No.2 states that he would withdraw the application for addition of the party bearing Exh.10 with the liberty to file fresh application for addition of party giving particulars. 4. In light of the above, the present Writ Petition is disposed of and the order below Exh.10 stands set aside with liberty to the Respondent No.2 to file fresh application for addition of party. No costs. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.12.09.2011. asp/office/wp5654.11 3