Petitsoner Rasj^ondents HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSQARH: BIU^SPUR WritPetitionfSl No. 797 of 2008 M.K. Shakya, S/o. Late Shri Tutaram Shakya, Aged about 41. years, occupation Sub-Eng'neer, Janpad Panchayat, Tllda, r/a. Purani Basti. Maroahl, Distt. Biiaspur (CG). Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through sts Secretapy', Department of Panchayat and Rurai Developrnent^ D.K.S. Bha¥/an,Raipur (CG). 2) Joint Secretaryr, Department of Panchyat and Rurai Deveiopment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 3) Deputy Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rurai Development, D.K.S. Bhav^n, Raipur (Writ Petition Artrcie under Articie 226 cf the Constitution of Sndia) SB: Hon'bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Presenfc Shri Vinay Pandey, counsei for the petftioner, Shri V.V.S,. Murthy, Dy. Advocate Genral with Smt. Blnu Sharma, Pane! La^er for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passedon 7ut February, 2008) The petitioner had fiied eariierWrit Petitlon (S) No. 5740 of 2007 questionlng the iegality and vaiidity ofthe order dated 31-8-2007 (Annexure P/6). The said petition waswithdrawn cn 1-10-2007 with libertytofsie a representation beforethe concerned authonties. 2) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the representations to considerthe case ofthe petltloner cn humanttarian ground were madeon 12-9-2007 (Annexure P/7) & 9-10-2007 (AnnexureP/9), butnoorder has been passed on the representations titi date. Learned counsei further submsts that the petitioner is forced to fiie thls petitson on the same ground ciasmlng the same reiief which was withdrawn eariier by the petitsoner. Raju - ^^ 3) in view of the fact that the petitioner v^as granted iiberty to fite a representation betore the concernaJ authorities in Writ Petition (8) No. 57€) of 2007, It is incumbent upon the authorlties to consider and pass appropriate order at the eariiest as tne probiem of the petitioner seems to be genuine and requsres consideratlon. 4) Shrl V.V.S. Murthy, Deputy Advocate Generai appearing for the State submits that there is no reason not to deolde the representationa fiied by the petitioners; in accordance wlth iav^. 5) Sn vlew of the foregoing, the respondent No.2/Jolnt Secretar^, Department of Panchayat and Rurai Development^ Government of Chhattisgarh, Raipur JB accordingly directed to conslder the represerAations as stated (siipra) fiied by the petltioner, In accordance wlth law and on Its own merit, aa eariy as possible, preferabiy wltnln a penod of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thls order. 6) in view of the above, the petitlon Is disposed of. Sd/. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge