IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.17904-M of 2010 Date of Decision:2.12.2010 Suraj Bhan .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Tribhuwan Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, A.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Prayer made in the present petition is for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.270 dated 15.8.2009 registered under Sections 498-A/304- B/34 IPC at Police Station Sampla, District Rohtak. Notice of motion was issued in this case on 29.6.2010. Thereafter, the case was adjourned on the request of the learned State counsel on the ground that some prosecution evidence is likely to be led on 16.9.2010 and 27.10.2010. Finally, on 8.11.2010, the case was further adjourned to produce the witnesses in the trial Court. Today, Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, A.A.G. Haryana, learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Ram Karan states that the statements of PW-1 Ruppal wife of Jagdish and PW-2 Narender son of Pawan have been recorded. Their statements are placed on record. The petitioner is stated to be 71 years of age. Material witnesses have been examined. He is in custody since 3.9.2009. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtak. 2.12.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE