IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18395 of 2010 MAIMUN KHATOON Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 25.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner and her two sons from the complainant are residing with her while another son is residing with the complainant. A piece of land existing in name of the complainant is sold allegedly by a fake person. Petitioner is one of the identifier of a fake person of a forged document. So, pendency of the Civil Suit cannot minimize petitioner’s criminal liability. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)