IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 7TH JANUARY 2010 / 17TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 504 of 2010(K) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- D.CHANDRA MOHAN, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, T.C.M.S., ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, K.S.E.B. KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNAN SRI.A.R.EASWAR LAL RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD(KSEB) REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, VYDUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD (KSEB), VYDUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. STANDING COUNSEL MR. K.S. ANIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J --------------------------------- WP(C) NO.504 OF 2010 ------------------------------ Dated this the 7th day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Diploma holder in Electrical Engineering, who is working as an Assistant Engineer. The complaint of the petitioner is regarding the rank in the seniority list that has been allotted to him. As per Ext.P1 judgment this court directed the KSEB to draw a fresh seniority list of Junior Engineers. On the basis of seniority in the feeder category on the principle of Supreme Court decision. The petitioner contents that he should have been placed above all the other persons who have been ranked in the seniority list. 2. The petitioner has submitted Ext.P3 representation but no orders have been passed thereon. The representation, Ext.P3 is of the year 2007. Therefore, it is submitted on behalf of the KSEB that if fresh representation were submitted the grievances of the petitioner would be considered and appropriate orders passed. W.P.(c) No.504/2010 2 3. In the light of the above circumstances, this writ petition is dispose of directing the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the second respondent stating the grievances in detail within a period of 10 days from today. If such a representation is made within a period stipulated above, the second respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon as expeditiously as possible at any rate within a period of six weeks there from. If the petitioner requests for a personal hearing, the same may also be granted. K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE. sou.