1 LPA235.11 Kambli IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.235 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5326 OF 2011 ... Shri Saraswati Mandir Sanstha and another ...Appellants v/s. Sou.Rekha Kundalik Ankush and another ...Respondents ... Mr.Rampal S. Kohli for Appellants. Mr.P.J.Thorat for Respondents. ... CORAM: D.K.Deshmukh & Anoop V. Mohta, JJ DATED: 25th August, 2011 P.C.: Admit. Heard finally by consent of parties. By consent of parties, the order dated 4th August, 2011 passed by the learned single Judge of this court in Writ Petition No. 3526 & Writ Petition No.5328 of 2011 is set aside, so also the order dated 29-4-2011 passed by the School Tribunal, Solapur in Appeal No.2 of 2009 is set aside. The Application at Exh.36 on the record of Appeal No.2 of 2009 is 2 LPA235.11 granted in following terms: (i) The Respondents in Appeal is permitted to produce documents which are discovered by them subsequent to the issuance of the termination order. (ii) They are also permitted to lead oral evidence to prove discovery and the documents which they will produce. It goes without saying that the Appellant in the Appeal shall be entitled to cross-examine the witness that may be produced by the Respondents in Appeal. (iii)The Tribunal is directed to decide the appeal as expeditiously as possible, in any case within a period of six months from today. (iv)Appeal disposed of. (Anoop V. Mohta, J.) (D.K.Deshmukh, J.) 3 LPA235.11 4 LPA235.11