@ HEGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAREI AT BILASPUR WRET PET§'I‘10N {S} No. 3377 01'2007 E’ETITIONER Awadh Ram Dansena Aged about 47 Yams. Sic. Shn' ,Bodh Ram Dansena, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Anjoripali, BEock Kharsia, Distt. Raigai‘h (06.) VERSUS ‘ State of Chhattjsgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan: Raipur (C.G.) The Direotor, Pubiic higtmctioxi Departmeiit Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer Kharsia Distt. Raigarh (CG) 5. Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Depai'tment, Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). RESPONDENTS J{\ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. $ing§e Bench : Hén’iiie Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. Y’rosent: Shri Anii Mouwa, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Y.S.Th9&uir, Govt. Ad‘mcate for the State,“ espondeiits. ORDER (Passed on 20m day ofJune, 2007} The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale W.e:f the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion ofnrobation period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same as to that of in W.P.(S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh & Others), which was allowed vide order dated 7. 1 1.2006. 3. In View ofthe above—stated submissions made bv learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge l