ty-a fslsivSi.A. StS-W-^'a' IN THE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S)No. <;~? 6 5 /2007(S.B.y PETITIONER : ^^ ri®-'' .•^".qy "t ~ A ry 'S&t. Ishwari Bhoi W^p, Shri Subodh Bhoi Aged about 36'' years, Asst. Teacher, R/o Vmage 85 Post- Sariya, Tah.-Sarangarh, Dist : Raigarh-(C.G.) ..<•••" VERSUS RESPONDENTS :l^—-Stateof Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 'District Education Officer Raigarh, Dist : Raigarh-(C.G.) Block Education Officer Block - Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) 3. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE S260F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HI6H COUKT OT CHH^TTISSARH AT BILASPUR W PfSlNo. 9(®ofa^)7 Petitioner ; Smt.Idiwari Bhoi Versus Respondents Stnte of Cbhattisgarh ondothers Petitioner W P.fSVKto 906 of 2007 Bhupdeo PFgaid Izardar Versus Respondents : StateofChhatl-isgarhandothers SB: HonlsleMr. JusticeSatish K. Ayiihotri. J Present: Mr.Vineet KumaF PcnTdey,counsel for 1he petitioners. Mr. AJay Dwivedi, Pcnel lawyer for the State/respondents. OR&ER 0»assedon -this 15th ttoy of Fesbruary, 2007) 1. The petitioners wiere appointed vide orders ddted 27.1.89 ond 31.3.89 (Annexure P/l), respectively as Assistant Teachers on fixed pay scale of Rs. 300/-. After cQmptetion of one year probation, they we.re granted regular pay scale. 2. Learned coun®teppearing for the petitionei's submits that the issue involved in the case is asto trfie-ther the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w^.f.the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Machya Prcidesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A.No. 274S/89 (AAadhufcant Yadu cnd 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & ol+iers), wherein 1 ;/"' '•^J- f" Bablu it w»s hetd that the Similarty situated tecchers are entitled to regulou' pay scate w.e.f. the date of initial eypointment. The matt'er wastaken-up to theHon'bleSupremeGourtinSpecialLeavePetition (Civil)No. 6892/93. Thesaidpetition wos disinissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regulap pay scale from date of initial cppointment. 4. Leamed counset oppearing for the petitioners further submits that this Court'.while considering the same issue in Sushil Tiwari &others Vs. State 6ovt. of Chhatfisgarh & others C^-P. (5) No. 5976 of 2006) by order dated 7-11-2006, has granted re9ular poy scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. 5. Leamed counsel appearmg for the parties jointly submit that'this cases are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Sushil Tiwari,& others Vs. Slate 6ovt. of Chhatt'isgarh A others (Supra). 6. In view of that, these writpetitions are allowed in the same terms. Ngorder as to costs. 7. A copy of this order be plawd on recocd in connected writ petition. ; Sd/- \ SatishK.Agnihotri Judge