IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28109 of 2010 1. GUPTESHWAR YADAV @ ALIA GUPTESHWAR KANT NIRALA 2. Tarun Kant Nirala @ Guddu Yadav 3. Barun Kant Nirala @ Fidu Yadav 4. Sunil Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 16.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Allegation is added by the submission made on behalf of the learned counsel for the informant that intention was to kill as two of the injuries are found on chest and arm grievous in nature. Litigating term is admitted in the case since earlier. Pistol on temporal reason was put but not used falsifies the allegation of the learned counsel about intention to kill rather it goes to show that allegations are placed in nature to refuse the bail otherwise Rs. 50,000/- and a cheque were snatched but no money is withdrawn. Further, allegation does not disclose about the intention of accused persons if they were intending to rob or cause assault. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Jamhore P.S. Case No. 28 of 2010 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Aurangabad 2 (Bihar) subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)