IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 6588 of 2009 Between: M/s. Victory Electricals Limited, Plot No.8, Sy.No. 855, Industrial Estate, Medchal, Hyderabad - 501 401, Rep. by its Managing Director, Mr. V. Mahindra. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commercial Tax Officer, Malkajgiri Circle, Manoranjan Complex, M.J. Road, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Malkajgiri Circle, Manoranjan Complex, M.J. Road, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 4 Central Power of Distribution Corporation Limited, Mint Compound, Beside Secretariat, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Chief Finance General Manager. 5 Northern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Warangal, Near Regional Engineering College, Kazipet, Rep. by its Chief Finance General Manager. 6 State Bank of Hyderabad, Shapurnagar Branch, Rep. by its Branch Manager. 7 State Bank of India, Balanagar Branch, Rep. by its Branch Manager. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in insisting for payment of the disputed tax of Rs.20,02,774/- for the tax period August, 2008 under the AP VAT Act, 2005 and the CST Act, 1956 without allowing adjustment of excess tax recovered for the assessment year 2004- 2005 as illegal, arbitrary, high handed and set aside the impugned orders passed by the 1st respondent in form 206 dated 06-10-2008, 05-03-2009 and the deistraint order issued by the 2nd respondent dated 19-03-2009 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. BHASKAR REDDY VEMIREDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3:G.P.FOR COMMERCIAL TAX Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5: MR. O. MANOHER REDDY, STANDING COUNSEL FOR CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LTD. Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: N.A. The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: (Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Permission is granted. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with no order as to costs. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 06-04-2009 bnr