w whaam; kiwi‘wxag mall/m 2/ T OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR IN THE HIGH COUR CHHATTISGARH / , A: V Writ Petitioxélsqizo. UV of 200¢ 3* g‘ /1. Shri. Chudamani Sahu, S/o PETITIONER!S] : VERSUS Chhattisgarh RESPONDENT§Sl : 1 . State of I Through: The Secretary, Shri. Angadlal as ‘Qr/ ‘7). I about: 36 years, posted as “Science” %g} '{Jw Assistant Teacher Higher Secondary W@}" Government Navagarh, ' Sch001,_ Siud Block: Distt: Jangir-Champa. {balk C} e ”f)’ \K O x)??? <\\$' X2. Shri. Om Prakash /Upadhyay, S/o Shri. Chhotelal‘ Upadhyay, as Aged about 38 years, posted Assistant Teacher “Science”, Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Khokhra, District: Block: Navagarh, Jangir—Champa. EjELA§E§B ‘ K SWGLE BENCH : HON’BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNiHOTRl, J. ‘ V é z . 1‘ WRIT PETITIQN ISJ N0.14 OF 2007 1 t ORDER (Passed on 15* Day of January, 2007)’ Learned counsél appearing for the paa'ties jointly submit ihat the facts and question of law invoived in the present writ petition are squareiy covered by the decision of this Coutt in the case of Dehman Nayak and others vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others (Writ Petition (3.) No.61 O2 of 2006), dated 8-1 1 -2006. Gopai ‘ 2. For the aforementioned reasons. the writ petition is ‘ aliowed in tetms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Dehman Nayak and others vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others (Supra). No order as to costs. sh K. Agnihotri i g » ’Judge' ’ " ‘ a i f i i t ‘ Peiitioners Shri Chudamani Sahu and another I versus ‘ i g. Respotiidents I ,State of Chhattisga’rh and another Preserit Dr. Shailesh Ahuja, ccunsel for the petitioners. ‘ Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel‘i’Lawyer for the State/respondents.