^^ ~>A.S- ~\ <i?1 -'dES1' HI^COIMT( CBSATTIS€A»»AT3BBASPCR .;'-": •W^PeBim^:Na.:l^<>£^^ PETinTOiER : S.P. PaiKl^-^ed 72 5«ars, son of late Shn^^^^K^^^ Paadey, j®sident ctf near bus staid, 'Nualaaagai, Bilaspur, Tahsfl &District Bilaspur(Ghhattis%arii): VERSUS : ! ,. :, RESPONDENTS : 1, State of CfahattisgMh, tinCTagfa yre &!cretar^ Department ofHigfaer Edueation, Saipur. 2. Gommissionei, ffigher Edueati<M»» Raipur (Clitetisgafh). 3. Goveming Body/Nfan^ing Camtmttee, C.M.D. P^i. CoBege, Bifaspur (Chhattisgarii). (WUTPEIiriON UNDERARTK:'LE226QF 'nXWNSJriUmWOFSSSA) (SBs Hffln'IiteMKSitfshK.Jtei^Btri.A) Kaaent : SfariSCTnaa&VCTma^Adyo^tiefortitepetttioner. SfariAjay Dwivedi, Deputy^ovt. AdvcMafeAM-ti^State.' ORALOSIMER (PassedxmJ'1' day of.lii^MBS) 1. The petitioner, who was worid^g offAe pdst^ifPnxfesspt'jnC.M.D. Q^^e, Bilaspwr, liasfil^thispestitionfi^gn^ encashxnentonthegn>undth^tfaeempl(9^^^pi"h^tecoIlegesaF& entitledtogetthebenefitofleaveencashtnent 2. Leamed counselappeariag for the respondeut subnritR ttattiie ease ofthe petitKmershaUbe considered iaaGeoidaneewifetherrtiojaid down by the Hon'ble SupiiMne Court mStateajfKcgsttteat&aMy&lw Vs. Semor Htgher Seccndary School, Lachhwi^wh & oiher^, 'witfaiaaperiodofsjxweeks. . 3. In view ofthe above, nothifflg snrvrees m tfieiiwtter. 4. Th^petitionisaccordiBglydisposedaE Noorderastocosts. Sahu sa/-, .Satish; i^i! Judg^i 2005 (K^SCC 346. J