iy IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CC.G.) W.P. No. !'?-3^--/2QQ6 PFTITIONER : ...- BMft" P BMCI IK^I-t wcww MOC ..... ^Jf>'.^les': >'.>i'c^>>" .^••'"ArfK"^.^'"" -^^vy^?>'" <tiu"A.-""' ^SRESPONDENTS p^'y .5? /^/ /cisY ^' ^ <^ ^' ^ / Vs. 1. 2. «•' 3. Chinta Ram Yadav, S/o S.R, Yadav aged about 35 years, R/o Raja Fancy Stores, Chudi Line, Near Banke Behari Temple, Raipur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary Treasury Department / Finance Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Sthaniya Nidhi Sampariksha, B-99, Main Road, Samta Colony, Near Doctor Pandey Nursing Home, Raipur (C.G.) The Join Director, Sthaniya Nidhi - Sampariksha, B-99, Main Road, Samta Colony, Near Doctor Pandey Nursing Home, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA The Petitioner named above most respectfully begs to prefer present writ as under: HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Slng^e Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agaihotri, J. W. P^No. 1484 OF 2006 Peti.tion.er : Chiata Rain Yadav Versus Respondeuts State of'Chhatdsgarh and others Shri Satish Chaadra Verma, counsel for the petitioner Shri G.K. Beriwal, Depuly Advocate General for the State. ORAL ORDER (28th March, 2006) The petitioner was appointed as Driver on daily wages by order dated 5.1.2001 for a period of 89 days. By order dated 22.7.2002 it was clarified that the appointaient of petitioner would be terminated on beiag inade available driver by the Govenunent. The petitioner has filed this petition for regularizatioa on fhe ground fhat the petitioner has been working siace Januaiy 2001, on daily wages basis. The petitioner further subnuts that fhe petitioner be penaitted to inake a representation to the coinpetent authority for consideration of his case for regularization, to which leamed counsel for fhe respondents has no objection. Thiis, fhe petitioner is granted liberty to inake a representatioa within a period of two •weeks to fhe conipetent authorily for consideration of his case for regularizatioa, IBL accordaace with law. In that event the 4. coinpetent authorities are directed to consider aad decide the same wifhin a period of six weeks, fironi the date of receipt of the representation. In view of foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. ;, Satish K. Agnihotri Judge UT"