IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2008 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 33852 of 2008(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.T.MYTHREYAN S/O.P.K.DAMODARAN, GANESH NIVAS, PAVAMANI ROAD, KOZHIKODE -673 001. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH VIJAYENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. KOZHIKODE CITY CORPORATION KOZHIKODE, CORPORATION BUILDING, KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 2. CALICUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, (DEVELOPMENT WING) CORPORATION BUILDING, KOZHIKODE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. ADV. SRI.K.D.BABU,SC,KOZHIKODE CORPORATION FOR R1,2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 33852 of 2008 EXT.P1: COPY OF THE PLAN SUBMITTED ON 28.8.2008 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 28.8.2008 FOR PAYMENT OF APPLICATION FEE. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD 19.9.2008 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.33852 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner submitted an application under Rule 7 of the Kerala Municipality Building Rules before the 1st respondent for a building permit for the construction of residential house allegedly in an area earmarked as residential zone in the development plan for Calicut Urban Area, 2001. The application was submitted on 28.8.2008. As per the Rules, the application has to be considered within one month, which is over. The 2nd respondent has not issued No Objection Certificate to enable the 1st respondent to issue the building permit. According to the petitioner, there is no reason for withholding the NOC and building permit to the petitioner. However, the 1st respondent is not passing any orders in the application for building permit is the grievance raised by the petitioner. I have heard the learned counsel for the respondents also. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the W.P.(c)No.33852/08 2 procedure/formalities would be completed and an order would be passed on the application submitted by the petitioner within a period of three weeks. This submission is recorded and the writ petition is closed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd