HI©HCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BtLASPUR Wnt Petitton No. 3SS6 of200S Petitioner Dinesh Kumar Agrawal Son ef Shri H.P. Agrawal, Age 48 years, Progress Assistant, Posted at the office of Joint Director, Veterinary Services, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Versus Respondents State of Chhatfsgarh Through Secretary, Department of Veterinary Services, Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (ChhaWsgarh) Director, Veterinary Swvices, liidira Gandhi Marg, Near Guruteg Bahadur Garden, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETtTION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDSA SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihofri Shri Anupam Dubey, Advocate for ttie petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Depufy Government Advocate for ttie Stete/respondents. B/- OLftD^g_R (Passed on this 13tn day of June, 2007) Learned counsel appoaring for ttie petittoner sutMnits that in the light of the circulars dated 12.5.1^13 (Annexure P/3) and 22nd July, 1993 (Annexure P/4), the petitioner, who was appointed on ad hoc basis and is ^itl continuing in service, is entitled to annual increments. Leamed counsel, at this stage, submlts that the petitioner does not want to press any other points, except that the respondents be directed to consKter the representation of the petitioner in the l^ht of the circulars aforementioned within the stipulated time, to whlt^i leamed counsel appearing for the respondents/State has no objectton. The writ petition is accorctingly disposed of wlth the direction to the concerned authorities to consider and dedde the representation of the petitioner, in accordance vnth tiie notirications, circulars. rules and regulations, on its own merit, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge