D/ 3 3mgE WW (3F ’ Va@ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) w.P.s.No. 518mg /10 PETITIONER Smt.Sohani Mishra,W/0 Late Gore lal Mishra aged about 45 years Book Llfter Gramya Bhantl Vldyaplth Hard1 Bazar Korba (C G) VERSUS ( State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Hlgher Educatlon D K S Bhawan Ralpur (C G) S2. Dlrector, Higher Education, Directorate Raipur (C.G.) 3.<‘ Shashtri Shikshan Samitl Through 1ts Secretary,Gramya Bhartr V1dyap1th (Mahav1dyalaya) Hard1 Bazar Korba (C G) RESPONDENTS xg/ R\Ms 3,0 \ RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE INDIA 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF / \ ‘90/ 9% HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER wags; Na. 5804/2010 PETITIGNER Smt. Sohani Mishra RESPONDENTS State of (1G. & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Shri Neeraj Choubey, counscl for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Maorthy, Dy. A.G. for the State/resps. 1 &. 2. ORDER (07.10.2010) Grievance of the petitioner in the present peh‘tion is that she is the employee of Government Aided private educational instituu‘on and though she is entitled for the benefit of 6th Pay Commission as mcommended by the Government for the; government employees but the same has not been given to her. According to the petitioner earlier also when the benem of 5th Pay Commission was Iefused to petitioner and simiiarly placed persons, writ petitions were med before this Court and ultimately after passing of order by this Court the benefit of 5th Pay Commission was ganted to them. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that ends of justice would be served if at this stage the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition and direction be issued to the respondent No.1 for deciding the pending representation of the petitioner (Annexure P/5) dated 11.6.2010. 3. Counsel appearing for the State submits that th representation has been made by the petitioner dilectly to the Chief Minister whereas she is required to make suitable representation to respondent NO. 1. He submits that the case of e W6? the petitioner and. similarly placed persons for gxant of 6th Pay Commission 1's already under consideration and let the petitioner make a mash mpmsentation and the same would be decided in accordancc with law. 4. Accordingly, tho petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. In the eventuality of filing a ftesh representation by the petitioner before the respondent No.1 within a pen‘od of one month from the date of Ieceipt of copy of this order, it is expected mm the said authorities to pass appropriate order as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months &om the date of its receipt. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge