IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9556 of 2007 GUNJAN KUMARI, DAUGHTER OF SRI KEDAR SINGH, WIFE OF BIPIN BIHARI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE THAHRA, POLICE STATION MAKER, DISTRICT SARAN AT CHAPRA……………………………PETITIOENR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE COMMISSIONER, SARAN DIVISION, SARAN, CHAPRA 5. THE COLLECTOR, SARAN, CHAPRA 6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION-CUM-DISTRICT PROGRAMME CO-ORDINATOR, CHAPRA 7. THE REGIONAL EDUCATION OFFICER-CUM- ADDITIONAL DISTRICT PROGRAMME CO- ORDINATAR SARAN, SIKSHA CHAPRA 8. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER OF LAND REFORMS, CHAPRA 9. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, MAKER, SARAN 10. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BHATHA, MAKER BLOCK, SARAN 11. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ BHATHA, MAKER BLOCK, SARAN. 12. MANJU KUMARI, DAUGHTER OF SRI HARDEO SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KASBA MAKER ANJANI, POST OFFICE MAKER, POLICE STATION MAKER, DISTRICT SARAN AT CHAPRA……………………………..…RESPONDENTS ----------- 2. 17.07.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State inform this Court that now the Tribunals constituted by the State Government under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Prarambhik Shikshak (Niyojan Avam Seva Sart) Niyamvali, 2006 are functional and are now - 2 - efficacious alternative forums available to the petitioner and others for consideration of their grievances. In view of the submissions of the learned counsels and in view of the availability of the efficacious alternative forum, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the concerned Tribunal, if not already filed, for redressal of her grievance. In case such an application is filed by the petitioner, the Tribunal shall make all endeavours to dispose of the same on its own merits by a speaking order preferably within the time prescribed under the Rules for the purpose. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)