IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20546 of 2011 1. Madan Rao Son Of Late Beni Madhav Bhatt Presently Residing At 4/D, Niket Anand Complex, Jagdeo Path, Baily Road, P.O. Hawai Adda, Patna - 800 014 ---Petitioner Versus 1. The Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna Through Its Managing Director 2. Managing Director, Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna 3. Manager (P & A), Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna --Respondents. ---------------------------------- with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20617 of 2011 1. Kripa Ram Son Of Late Hridya Ram At Present Residing At Pranvah Lane, New Vikamshila Colony, Barahpur, P.S. Ishak Chak, District Bhagalpur. ---Petitioner Versus 1. The Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna Through Its Managing Director. 2. Managing Director, Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna. 3. Manager (P & A), Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna. ---Respondents. ---------------------------------- with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21246 of 2011 Balram Mandal S/o late Gosain Mandal, residing at Indrapuri Road no. Zero, P.O. Kesari Nagar, Patna. 800024. ---Petitioner. Versus The Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna Through Its Managing Director. 2. Managing Director, Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna. 3. Manager (P & A), Bihar State Financial Corporation, Fraser Road, Patna. ---Respondents. ---------------------------------- 03 01.12..2011 All these writ petitions, with the consent of the parties have been heard together as common issues have been raised therein. The present order shall govern them. Heard Mr. Manik Vedasen, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. K.D. Chatterjee, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent-Bihar State Financial Corporation. Petitioners, in all these writ petitions, have prayed for issuance of appropriate direction commanding the respondents to pay salary for the period they were not permitted to work although the age of superannuation had been enhanced. There is agreement at Bar that similar issue was raised in a batch of writ petitions being CWJC No. 1324 of 2011 and analogous matters which was/were disposed of by this Court vide order dated 29.08.2011. It is submitted by both the parties that present batch of writ petitions be also disposed of in the same terms. In view of the aforesaid, the present applications are also disposed of in the terms in which CWJC No. 1324 of 2011 and analogous cases were disposed of. In giving effect to the order, the respondents shall refer to the reasonings and the operative portion of the order passed in CWJC No. 1324 of 2011. It is made clear that the present order shall abide by the final orders to be passed in the pending Letters Patent Appeal(s) preferred by the respondent-Corporation against the order dated 29.08.2011 passed in CWJC No. 1324 of 2011 and its analogous cases. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)