1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR L.P.A.NO.487 of 2010 in W.P.NO.2285 OF 2009 (D) Smt.Leelabai Manikrao Mokde ..vs.. New Subhedar Layout Urban Credit. =-=-==-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Smt.Meenazi Iyer Adv. for the appellant. Mr.Ambilwade Adv. for the respondent. C ORAM : J.P.DEVADHAR AND A.B.CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED : 12th October, 2010. Heard. The only grievance made by the learned counsel for the appellant is that the amount of Rs.25000/- that was paid by cheque by the appellant ought not to have been credited in the interest account of loan that was outstanding and should have been credited in the principal amount. We do not agree. The learned Single Judge also found that the amount of interest accrued on the loan was required to be paid by the lonee and that is by virtue of the agreement between the Society and the lonee. In the result, we find no merit in the Letters Patent Appeal. The same is, therefore, dismissed with costs. JUDGE JUDGE. pzc 2