WP(C) 4426/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. G.C. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Mishra, learned Standing counsel, Education Department. I have also heard Mr. H .K. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 4. The petitioner who has retired from service on attaining the age of supe rannuation has filed this writ petition praying for a direction to the responden ts to allow him to function as the Principal of the Higher Secondary Section of the School. Be it stated here that the petitioner retired from service as Headma ster of the school and the said school has now opened Higher Secondary section w hich is at the venture stage. After the retirement from service, the Managing Co mmittee of the school took a resolution to allow the petitioner to look after th e Higher Secondary section as the Principal. The grievance of the petitioner is that the present Headmaster of the school section has been interfering with the functioning of the Higher Secondary section and in doing so, the Inspect of Sch ools has the full support. On the other hand, it is the stand of the respondents that the Managing Committee of the school by its resolution dated 09.05.2010 has allowed the Headm aster of the school to look after the affairs of the venture stage of Higher Sec ondary section of the school. From the above, what is seen, is that the matter basically relates to th e management of venture stage of Higher Secondary section. It is the prerogative of the Managing Committee to decide as to how the function of the Principalship of the said Higher Secondary section, which is at the venture stage, would run. However in running the affairs of the said Higher Secondary section, except th e guidance etc. , there cannot be any meddling of the affairs by the Inspector o f schools. At the same time, said section being at the venture stage having no c ontrol of the governmental authority, its affairs cannot be made amenable to the writ jurisdiction. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of providing that t he Managing Committee will deicide as to how the affairs of the Higher Secondary section of the school is to run. At the same time the Inspector of School shall not interfere with the functioning of the said section being run by the Managin g Committee of the school. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the affa irs of the Higher Secondary section of the school is being run by another Managi ng Committee and not by the Managing Committee of the High School. If that be so , said Managing Committee of the Higher Secondary school will run the affairs of the said section.