wp2492.11.odt 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETN. NO.2492/2011 Gajanan Ukarda Aglave -vs- Additional Commissioner, Amravati and others ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri S. D. Chopde, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Pathan, the learned A.G.P. for the respondent Nos.1 to 3. Shri L.H. Kothari, the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.4 to 7. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : 06.09.2011. Heard. The only ground raised by the petitioner for challenging the orders passed by the authorities below and the no confidence motion passed against the petitioner is that the resolution was not proposed and seconded as required by Rule 17 of the Meeting Rules, 1959. However, on hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record which includes the report of the Tahsildar, it appears that the resolution was proposed by Vikas Jadhav and was seconded by Rajesh Taktod. Even otherwise, it appears that the proceedings were conducted in accordance with the law and the petitioner could not have validly challenged the no confidence motion passed against the petitioner. wp2492.11.odt 2/2 In the result, the writ petition fails and is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE KHUNTE