1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR JUDGMENT BHURA LAL & ORS. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. SB Criminal Revision Pet. No. 661 OF 2008 under Section 397 read with section 401 Cr.P.C. against the order dated May 23, 2008 of Addl. Sessions Judge No.2 (Fast Track) Kota in Sessions Case No.48 of 2008 whereby she has framed charge against the accused petitioners for the offence under sections 147, 148, 323, 323/149, 325, 325/149, 307 and 307/149 IPC. Date of Order : April 9, 2009 PRESENT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA Mr. Nitin Jain, for the petitioner. Dr. Mahesh Sharma for the respondent Mr. Pradeep Shrimal, Public Prosecutor. BY THE COURT : This revision petition has been filed by the petitioners against the order dated May 23, 2008 of Addl. Sessions Judge No.2 (Fast Track) Kota in Sessions Case No.48 of 2008 whereby she has framed charge against the accused petitioners for the offence under sections 147, 148, 323, 323/149, 325, 325/149, 307 and 307/149 IPC. 2. Without going into the merits 2 of the case Mr. Nitin Jain, learned counsel for the petitioners requested this court that after the statement of doctor is recorded, liberty should be granted to the petitioners to move application under section 216 Cr.P.C. 3. Dr. Mahesh Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent and Mr. Pradeep Shrimal, Public Prosecutor seriously opposed the arguments advanced on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. In view of the above, I dispose of this revision petition with the direction that the petitioner is free to move application under section 216 Cr.P.C. after recording the statement of doctor. The trial court is directed to record the statement of doctor on priority basis. As the main petition has 3 been disposed the stay application also stands disposed. (Mahesh Chandra Sharma) J. OPPareek/