1 C.P.326.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.326 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 777 OF 2010 [Vasudeo Shaurao Kunde and another Vs. Kendre,the Collector, Aurangabad and others] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Ms.Chhaya N. Lahare,Advocate holding for Mr.N.J.Pahune Patil,Advocate for petitioner Mr.A.S.Deshpande,Advocate for Resp.No.1 Mr.D.R.Kale,AGP for respondent-State. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner makes a statement that the petitioner has already received rental compensation. 3. Learned respective counsels appearing for respondents also submit that order of which disobedience as alleged in this 2 C.P.326.11 Contempt Petition has been complied with. It is true that, after filing this contempt petition, the order is complied with by the respondents. The Supreme Court in the case of Suresh Chandra Poddar Vs. Dhani Ram and others, reported in (2000)1 SCC 766 held that ‘even where the order of Court is complied with, subsequent to receipt of notice of contempt, Court should show judicial grace and magnanimity in dealing with action for contempt.’ . In that view of the matter the petition stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. Sd/- [S.S. SHINDE, J.] MTK