Order with Signature Office Note as to tftej:notn[foarEye,r 18. 12. 9.05 Heard Mr. A.K. Upadhyaya, learned enior counsel assisted by Ms. Manita radhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Iso heard Mr. S.P. Wangdi, -learned Advocate eneral assisted by Mr. J.B. Pradhan and Mr. arma Thinlay, learned Government Advocates for the State respondent. Upon-hearing, Mr. Upadhyaya, learned enior counsel for the petitioner at some ength, Mr. Upadhyaya in his usual frankness ubmitted that the petitioner desires to ithdraw the present writ petition with a iberty to approach the respondent authority or her appointment in the post of phthalmic Technician against any one of the acant posts lying under the respondent's epartment concerned. We have perused the rit petition. After proper application of our mind in he matter, we are of the view that the rayer of the petitioner is reasonable and ccordingly, it is allowed thus closing the resent writ petition with liberty to the etitioner to approach the concerned espondent authority for her appointment in he post of Ophthalmic Technician by f iling fresh representation. It is made clear hat the matter is left under the wisdom and om:in¢ of the concerned respondent authority or consideration of her appointment in the ost of Ophthalmic Technician. As we the matter isbfi#dtm and -+- izE pbserved that •1\, ,`, 1 . . Serial No. Of Order Order with Signature om:inj2t of the respondent authority, we hope nd trust that certainly, the authority oncerned shall consider the case of the rit petitioner. In the result, the writ petition is isposed of on withdrawal. chLeft¥u;tL*#r chLeft¥ustff (A. Subba ) Judge