KBP 1 wp7878-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7878 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr.U.P.Warunjjikar, for petitioner. Mr.D.M.Vyas i/b.Mr.Durga Prasad Sabnis, for respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 22 nd November, 2010 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2] The petitioner, who is defendant, filed an application for amendment of the written statement after commencement of trial. By the impugned order, the said application has been rejected by holding that there is no explanation for delay. 3] The order impugned is purely interlocutory in nature which is capable of being challenged in an appeal which may be preferred by the petitioner against the decree passed in the suit, if the same is adverse to the petitioner. Hence, no case for interference at this stage is made out. Subject to what is observed above, Writ Petition is rejected. [ A.S. OKA, J.] KBP 2 wp7878-10.sxw