IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11448 of 2011 Arshad Ali Versus Amna Jebeen ----------- 02. 19.07.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed against the order dated 29.06.2011 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Samastipur whereby the learned Court below refused the prayer of the petitioner to constitute a separate medical board at Samastipur for examining physical characteristic of the respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner filed the divorce case only on the ground that respondent is not physically fit for physical relation and, therefore, the application was filed for examining physical features of the respondent by independent medical Board at Samastipur. The learned counsel submitted that in fact at the time of bail application moved by the petitioner, a medical board was constituted and has given report in favour of the wife-respondent but that report has been gained 2 over by the wife. In such circumstances, the prayer was made but the learned Court below has wrongly refused to constitute medical board. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below has considered the fact that medical board report is already available on record. The only objection of the petitioner is that the said medical board report has been obtained by the wife-respondent collusively. Merely because the allegation has been made that the report of the medical board is collusively, in my opinion, no second medical board can be constituted. Therefore, I find no reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)