IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST AUGUST 2011 / 9TH BHADRA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 530 of 2011(S) --------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.21986/2010 Dated 31/01/2011 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------------------- A.STARSON JAMES, S/O.J.A.NAYAGAM, AGED 56 YEARS, DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER (RETIRED), FARISTA, AISWARYA COLONY P.O., PUTHUNAGARAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS --------------------------------------------------- 1. SRI.JAMES VARGHESE, I A S FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM - 695 001. 2. SRI.A.P.M.MOHAMMED HANEESH, I A S FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, TRIVANDRUM - 695 014. 3. SRI.J.MAHALEKSHMY MENON, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E), KERALA, TRIVANDRUM -39 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JAMES MATHEW KADAVAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts COC.NO.530/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEX I COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP(C) NO.21986OF 2010-W RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Con. Case (C) No.530 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 31st day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T The learned Government Pleader submits that, the Annexure I judgment has been complied with by paying the balance DCRG and the terminal leave surrender benefits to the petitioner. The counsel for the petitioner submits that, the counsel has not got any information regarding the same. In the above circumstances, recording the submission of the learned Government Pleader, this Contempt of Court Case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to restore the Contempt of Court Case to file, if the submission made is found to be wrong. Sd/- S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE //True copy// P.A. TO JUDGE shg/