IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.7512 OF 2009 1. PRAMOD YADAV, SON OF LUCHO YADAV 2. CHANDA SHEKHAR YADAV, SON OF CHANGAN YADAV BOTH RESIDENT OF SAHAURA DIRA, POLICE STATION RUPAULI (MOHANPUR), DISTRICT PURNEA VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR WITH CR.MISC. NO.7976 OF 2009 MANOJ YADAV, SON OF GODO YADAV, RESIDENT OF SAHAURA DIRA, POLICE STATION RUPAULI (MOHANPUR) DISTRICT PURNEA VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ********** 3 08/06/2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, the informant and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are accused in a case under Sections 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that the petitioners along with others have kidnapped the mother of the informant. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that it has transpired in the case diary that the lady in question had ran away from her home twice earlier and as such it is possible that she may have left her home on her own without informing the family members. However, there is specific allegation that these petitioners were involved in the alleged 2 kidnapping of the lady in question. Considering this aspect, I am not inclined to grant bail to the above named petitioners at this stage. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )