THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7730 OF 2008 ORDER: This petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the proceedings in Crl.R.P.No.89 of 2007 dated 17.09.2008 on the file of the court of the I Additional Sessions Judge, Anantapur. Brief facts are that the first respondent for herself and on behalf of the second respondent filed a petition under section 125 of Cr.P.C. before the court of first instance seeking maintenance from the petitioner herein. On appreciation of evidence both oral and documentary, the learned Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Uravakonda dismissed the petition in so far as the first respondent is concerned as she herself neglected and deserted the petitioner herein, but, however, granted maintenance to the second respondent at Rs.500/- per month. Questioning the said order, the first respondent preferred Crl.R.P.No.89 of 2007 before the court of the I Additional Sessions Judge, Anantapur and the learned I Additional Sessions Judge by his order dated 17.09.2008 allowed the said revision petition and directed the petitioner herein to pay an amount of Rs.900/- per month. Aggrieved thereby the petitioner who is the husband filed this Criminal Petition. Heard both sides. This court having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also having gone through the orders passed by both the courts below is thoroughly satisfied that the court below has rightly came to the conclusion that the petitioner himself has neglected the first respondent and that the petitioner has not clinchingly established the fact that the first respondent herself has deserted him. So the second respondent being the legally wedded wife of the petitioner is also entitled to maintenance. The said finding of the court below, in my considered view, needs no interference. For this reason this court is not inclined to entertain this petition and accordingly this Criminal Petition is dismissed. ----------------- 29.04.2010 Kvsn