IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 22321 of 2010 Date of Decision: 15.12.2010 Sardavinder Goyal, Advocate ...Petitioner Versus State of U.T. Chandigarh and others ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKUL MUDGAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present : Petitioner in person. **** MUKUL MUDGAL, C.J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.1 to take steps for implementation of the earlier announcement made by the Chandigarh Administration in the year 2008 (Annexure P-2) whereby Auto Rickshaws were announced to be banned from ferrying school children to their schools from Ist January, 2009 and respondents also be directed to implement such rules in the States of Punjab and Haryana also. It was also prayed that respondents be directed to implement the rules of Motor Vehicles Act more stringently and to take strict action against overloaded Auto Rickshaw (Three Wheeler) or any other kind of vehicle which carries more passengers than its capacity. CWP No. 22321 of 2010 [2] 2. This petition does not have the necessary particulars in detail and accordingly the petitioner who is appearing in person seeks leave to withdraw this petition. 3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a petition with better particulars particularly those indicating the effect of ban on Auto Rickshaws and the availability of economically cheaper public transport modes for the children affected by the ban sought to be imposed by this petition. (MUKUL MUDGAL) CHIEF JUSTICE (RANJAN GOGOI) 15.12.2010 JUDGE 'ravinder'