IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 27TH MAY 2010 / 6TH JYAISHTA 1932 WP(C).No. 16226 of 2010(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SOBY ISAC, U.P.S.A., M.M.U.P.SCHOOL, PITTUKARIKULAMHU, KORANCHIRA P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR SMT.N.N.PRASEEDA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. THE MANAGER, M.M.U.P.SCHOOL, PITTUKARIKULAMHU, KORANCHIRA P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.DILIP MOHAN- R1,R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO.16226 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of May, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a Upper Primary School Assistant working in M.M.U.P School wherein the third respondent is the manager. She was appointed as U.P.S.A with effect from 6.6.2002. The said appointment was approved. Staff fixation for the year 2008-09 was revised as per Ext.P1 order dated 21.11.2009 based on the report of the super check cell. In the revised staff fixation, six teachers including the petitioner were found in excess and they are facing retrenchment. The contention of the petitioner is that a consideration of the claim of the petitioner in terms of G.O.(P) No.175/99 dated 26.7.92 by applying 1:40 teacher student ratio would enable her to continue in service. Therefore, pointing the aforesaid aspects, the petitioner has already submitted Ext.P2 revision petition before the first respondent. The said revision petition is still pending. 2. Considering the fact that the petitioner has already approached the first respondent, without going into the merits of the contentions raised by the petitioner, this Writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the W.P.(C) NO.16226/2010 2 first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 revision petition submitted by the petitioner expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) NO.16226/2010 3 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. W.P.(C). NO. 16226/2010 JUDGMENT 27th May, 2010