$-10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3132/2011 o/o JAIPREET SINGH BAKSHI & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Pankaj Mendiratta, Adv. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents CORAM: Through Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for State with 51 Narinder Kaur, PS Lajpat Nagar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ORDER 20.09.2011 Cri.M.A.11125/2011 Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions. Criminal M.A. stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3132/2011 1. Issue notice. 2. Ld. APP accepts notice on behalf of State/respondent No.1. Ms.Vimmy Bakshi, respondent No.2 who is present in person and is identified by 10, accepts notice. 3. Ld. counsel for the petitioners submits that vide FIR No.35 dated 03.02.2009 a case was registered against the petitioners under Section 406/498A/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 at PS Lajpat Nagar on the complaint of respondent No.2. 4. Ld. counsel for the petitioners further submits that respondent ' -'· Signing Date:27.08.2024 16:57:17 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified No.2 after having settled all the disputes have decided to live together with petitioner No.1 as husband and wife vide settlement dated 17.08.2010. 5. In clause 6(a) of the Settlement dated 17.08.2010 it is stated that respondent No.2 undertakes to co-operate in the quashing of FIR No.35/2009 under Section 406/498A/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 at PS Lajpat Nagar pending before the Court of Ms. Surya Malik Grover, MM, Delhi. 6. Respondent No.2 further submits that she has no grievance against the petitioners qua the aforesaid FIR and she is staying at her matrimonial home with the petitioner No.1. 7. Keeping in view the settlement between the petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 and that they are living happily together; in the interest of justice, FIR No.35/2009 under Section 406/498A/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered against the petitioners at PS Lajpat Nagar and the proceedings arising out therefrom are hereby quashed. 9. CRL.M.C. 3132/2011 is allowed in the above terms. SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 vld SURESH KAIT,J -" _ __!,