THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.23481 of 2010 Dated 22nd September, 2011 Between: Mandava Towers Owners’ Welfare Association …Petitioner And Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep.by its Commissioner, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri I.Gopal Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri C.Damodar Reddy The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent No.1 in taking suitable action on the petitioner’s complaint/representation, dated 28.01.2010, as illegal. The petitioner sought for a consequential direction to respondent No.1 to demolish the unauthorised constructions made by respondent Nos.2 and 3 in terms of notice, dated 15.05.2010. On behalf of respondent No.1, the Deputy Commissioner of Circle-1 (Kapra Circle), GHMC, filed a counter affidavit and also an additional counter affidavit. In the additional counter affidavit, it is inter alia stated that the Corporation has issued notices under Sections 452 and 636 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’) to respondent Nos.2 and 3 in respect of flat Nos.S1 and S2 in stilt floor of Mandava Towers and demolished flat No.S2 belonging to respondent No.3 on 23.09.2010. That since respondent No.2 filed O.S.No.464 of 2010 in the Court of the learned II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District and secured an ex parte order of injunction, no action for demolition of flat No.S1 of respondent No.2 is taken. That subsequently having regard to the limited nature of the interim order, the Corporation issued final notice under Section 636 of the Act to respondent No.2 on 16.09.2011 and demolished the unauthorised structure in stilt floor (flat No.S1) on 17.09.2011. In support of this averment, the Deputy Commissioner has filed photographs, from a perusal of which, this Court is satisfied that the unauthorised constructions have been removed. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also not disputed this position. Having regard to the above subsequent events, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.30057 of 2010 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 22nd September, 2011 VGB