1 Cri.A.4890.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4890 OF 2011 Babita Taterao Solanke R/o. Sailu,Ta. Sailu, District Parbhani. ...APPLICANT. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra. ...RESPONDENT. ... Shri.S.S.Rathi,Advocate for Applicant. Shri.B.V.Wagh,A.P.P. for Respondents. ... CORAM: R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel on both sides. 2. The applicant apprehends arrest in connection with Crime No. 171 of 20011 registered with Sailu Police Station, District Parbhani for the offence punishable under sections 420, 466, 467, 468 and 471 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The complainant has filed FIR by contending that he has purchased the plot in the year 1992 from the society being Plot No. 69. According to 2 Cri.A.4890.11 the complainant, till Society went into liquidation the plot stood in his name. After liquidation of the society showing his consent plot No. 69 has been transferred to the present applicant. He claims that, the present applicant has indulged in forgery along with others and that is why he is deprived of the plot No. 69. 4. After having considered the police papers, it is clear that prima case is made out against the present applicant that name of the applicant is incorporated in the list of plot holders in respect of plot No. 69, in illegal manner. Investigation will have to be carried out. Proper investigation can be done only after having custodial interrogation of the present applicant. Consequently, the present application is liable to be rejected. Hence, the following order: . The application is rejected. Sd/- [ R.Y.GANOO, J.] MTK 3 Cri.A.4890.11