IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16840 of 2010 RAM DULARI DEVI, WIFE OF LATE DHARAM CHAND MEHTA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O. MACHHAHI, P.S. SAKRA, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUZAFFARPUR, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. 3. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, SAKRA, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. 4. THE TREASURY OFFICER, MUZAFFARPUR DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. 5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. ----------- 2 05.10.2010 Heard the parties. The grievance of the petitioner is that although she is receiving a family pension after the death of her husband who retired from the post of Village Level Worker in Sakra Block. However, the payment of family pension has not been revised after the revision despite representation. Learned counsel for the State submits that the grievances of the petitioner be considered as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 3 with a copy to respondent nos. 2, 4 and 5. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy 2 of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Amrendra ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J. )