IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 8447 of 2005 Between: Kalamma, R/o. Mankal Village, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Pahadi Shareef Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Twin Cities. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an Order, direction, or a Writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the Respondents herein to produce Surender, S/o. Jangaiah and R. Krishna, S/o. Babaiah, R/o. Mankal Village, Ranga Reddy District before this Hon'ble Court, who were illegally arrested by the Police Personnel of Pahadi Shareef Police Station, Ranga Reddy District on 06-04-2005 and set them at liberty forthwith and to pass such other or further orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances, of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:TELEGRAM Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following Oral Order: (per Sri B. Sudershan Reddy,J) One Smt. Baki Ramulamma, lodged a report alleging that on the intervening night of 4/5-4-2005 at 01.30 Hours, some unknown offenders snatched away one Pustela Thadu worth about Rs.12,000/- from the neck of the complainant while she was sleeping in her house without bolting the doors from inside. She expressed her suspicion as to the involvement of the alleged detenus Sri Surender and Sri R. Krishna. On receiving the report, the police registered Crime No. 83 of 2005 under Section 380 of I.P.C., on 10.4.2005. During the course of investigation, the alleged detenus were summoned to the police station on 12.4.2005 for the purposes of making enquiries and on finding that nothing was established as on the date against the alleged detenus, they were asked to leave the police station. They were not arrested. In such view of the matter, no further directions, as such, are required to be issued in this Writ of Habeas Corpus. Suffice it to note that the police called the alleged detenus to the police station on 21.4.2005 in connection with investigation of Crime No. 83 of 2005 and after examining them, were set at liberty without arresting them. This statement made in the counter affidavit shall form part of the record. The writ petition shall accordingly stand closed. _______________________ B. SUDERSHAN REDDY,J 27th April, 2005 _______________ C.V. RAMULU,J pnb To 1 The Station House Officer, Pahadi Shareef Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Twin Cities. 3 Two C.Cs. to the Advocate General, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad.(OUT) 4 2 C.D. copies