1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.12.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Criminal Original Petition (MD)No.16006 of 2011 Chinnathambi ... Petitioner Vs. State rep. by 1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy, Trichy District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manaparai, Trichy District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Valanadu Police Station, Trichy District. 4.Dharmalingam 5.Samykannu 6.Palanisamy 7.Selvam 8.Rajagopal 9.Perumal (Notice to R4 to R9 is dispensed with) ... Respondents PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 3rd respondent to take action against the proposed accused/4th to 9th respondents herein and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to provide police protection to the petitioner and his family members based on the petitioner's representation dated 24.11.2011. For Petitioner :Mr.S.Muthalraj For Respondents :Mr.P.Kannithevan Govt. Advocate,Crl. Side for R1 to R3 R4 to R9 - given up O R D E R This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent, to take action against the proposed accused/4th to 9th respondents herein and consequently, direct the 3rd respondent to provide police protection to the petitioner and his family members, based on the petitioner's representation dated 24.11.2011. 2.Heard Mr.S.Muthalraj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Kannithevan, learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 3/State. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3.At the time of argument, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would request the Court that since he has restricted his prayer only to give police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and his family members, notice to the respondents 4 to 9 may be given up and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, notice to the respondents 4 to 9 is given up. 4.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit that they would give police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and his family members. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (criminal side), the respondent police is directed to give police protection only to the life and limb of the petitioner and his family members, on the basis of the representation made by the petitioner dated 24.11.2011 to the respondents 1 to 3. 6.With the above said direction, this criminal original petition is ordered accordingly to that extent. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TO 1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy, Trichy District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manaparai, Trichy District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Valanadu Police Station, Trichy District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1cc to M/s.Na.Palaniyandi, Advocate, Sr.No.43560 arul GH : 22.12.2011 : 2p/6c Crl.O.P.(MD) No.16006 of 2011 13.12.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/