IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28328 of 2004 Rakesh Kumar Singh, Son of Late Rudradeo Narayan Singh, Resident of L-62, Krishna Nagar, P.S. Buddha Colony, District Patna. -------- Petitioner Versus 1. State of Bihar. 2. Reshma Singh, D/o Sri Prakash Singh, R/o Patliputra Tobacco Company, Opp. B.N. College, Ashok Rajpath, Patna-800004. -------- Opposite Parties With CR. REV. No.454 of 2005 Reshma Singh @ Guriya, D/o Sri Prakash Singh, Mohalla Station Road, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, District Patna. ------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Vivek Kumar Singh, S/o late Rudradeo Narayan Singh. 3. Sri Savitri Devi, Wife of Late Rudradeo Narayan Singh. 4. Priti Kumari @ Dufali, D/o Late Rudradeo Narayan Singh. 5. Raja @ Rakesh Pd. Singh, S/o Late Rudradeo Narayan Singh. 6. Abhaya Singh, S/o Sri Rakesh Singh. All of Village Mahiya Deyorhi, P.S. Saketpur, District Darbhanga at present Krishna Nagar, P.S. Budha Colony, District Patna. 7. Gunjan Singh, S/o Om Prakash Singh, Resident of Mohalla and P.S. Budha Colony, District Patna. 8. Gagandeo Narayan Singh, S/o Sri Lutani Singh, Resident of Mohalla Housing Colony, Typed B, Kankarbagh, Patna. -------- Opp. Parties ----------- 18 23.11.2010 Cr.Misc. No.28328 of 2004 Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into account that good sense has prevailed upon them in settling their matter outside the Court as would be evident from joint petition filed by them; reading as follows:- “1. That this joint petition is being filed in view of the fact that the informant is no more willing to pursue the prosecution and the 2 parties have already resolved their disputes outside the court. 2. That it is stated that with the intervention of the well wishers and family members of the parties more particularly Master Aditya, son of the Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh and Mrs. Reshma Singh (the Opposite Party No.2 and informant of the case) the Opposite Party No.2 is no more interested in continuing with the case arising out of Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 40/97. 3. That there exists no dispute between the parties in view of compromise between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the case so as to secure peace in the respective families of the parties. 4. That it is jointly submitted that to secure ends of justice, the case arising out of Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 40/97 may be quashed. It is therefore, prayed that your Lordship may graciously be pleased to quash the case arising out of Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 40/97 in view of the compromise between the parties.” this Court would quash the entire proceeding including order taking cognizance in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 3 40 of 1997. This application is accordingly disposed of. CR. REV. No.454 of 2005 Counsel for the petitioner, in view of the order passed in Cr. Misc. No. 28328 of 2004, seeks permission to withdraw this application. This application is accordingly permitted to be withdrawn. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)