IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 25TH AUGUST 2009 / 3RD BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 23120 of 2009(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- NAIMUNISA, W/O.B.S.MOIDEEN SAHIB, SHAHANAZ MANZIL, BAPPAITHOTTI, P.O.UPPALA, KASARAGOD TALUK, PIN-671 322. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.SOHAN SMT.SREEJA SOHAN.K. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. ASHFAK, S/O.SHEIK KASIM SAHIB, NOOR MANZIL, BAPPITHOTTI, KASARAGOD TALUK. 2. SHEIK KASIM SAHIB, NOOR MANZIL, BAPPAITHOTTI, KASARAGOD TALUK. 3. ABDUL LATHEEF, S/O.THASLIM ISMAIL SAHIB, THASLIM MANZIL, BAPPAITHOTTI, UPPALA, KASARAGOD TALUK. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANJESWAR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.C.NO.23120/2009 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER'S HUSBAND BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT DT. 16.6.2009. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT GIVEN BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT ON RECEIPT OF EXT.P1, DT. 16.6.2009. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT DT. 10.8.2009. KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.23120 of 2009 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 25th August, 2009. J U D G M E N T Kurian Joseph, J. The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayer :- “Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or order directing respondent No.4 to take effective steps to prevent the illegal activity of respondents 1 to 3 and give necessary protection to the petitioner and her family members from the illegal activity of respondents 1 to 3 and their associates.” Pursuant to the direction issued by this court, the parties are present before us. We had the assistance of Adv.Sri.K.Ramachandran (Retired District Judge). Thanks to the interaction made by the learned counsel, we find that the parties have settled their disputes amicably. It is submitted that there will not be any interference on the part of respondents 1 to 3 in the personal and family matters of the petitioner. It is further submitted that there will not be any harassment either and therefore, the interference by the police is unnecessary. The writ petition is hence disposed of recording our appreciation for the earnest efforts taken by Adv.Sri.K.Ramachandran and directing WP(C) NO.23120/09 2 the parties to maintain their good relationship. In the event of any difficulty, it will be open to the parties to approach the District Legal Services Authority, Kasaragod, in which case, the said authority will take the required prompt steps. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.23120 of 2009 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 25th August, 2009.