IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.10556-M of 2011 Date of Decision:7.4.2011 Mrs. Tanu and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Rajinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Respondent No.4 is present in person through counsel Mr. P.K. Rohilla, Advocate. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and also directing respondent No.4 not to interfere in the personal lives of the petitioners. Notice of motion. Mr. P.K. Rohilla, Advocate, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.4. The petitioners as well as respondent No.4 along with their counsel are present in the Court. Learned counsel for respondent No.4 stated that respondent No.4 being the mother of petitioner No.1 be allowed to meet her for few minutes. Accordingly, the request was accepted and respondent No.4 was allowed to meet her daughter. Thereafter, learned counsel for respondent No.4 stated that respondent No.4 has no objection to the marriage between Crl. M. No.10556-M of 2011 -2- the parties and therefore, they need not have any fear. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that in case petitioners still feels threatened, they are at liberty to approach respondent No.2, who shall look into the grievances of the petitioners and if found necessary, take appropriate measures in accordance with law. 7.4.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE