IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.6786/2010 Aslam Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 27/07/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. C.R. Chaudhary } for accused petitioner Mr. K.C. Sharma } Mr. Amit Poonia,Public Prosecutor for the State ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the accused petitioner is that the petitioner has been made accused in the present case only because his photograph was used by co-accused Kallu while preparing forged registration certificate of the vehicle which was sold to Aalam. There is no evidence to the effect that petitioner was involved in preparing forged document and in sale of vehicle. Challan has already been filed. No other criminal case was ever registered against the petitioner. He has been in jail since 25.3.2010 and that the trial of the case is likely to take considerable time. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications. Considering the rival submissions and without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail during trial. Resultantly, the bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Aslam S/O Shri Rashid shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No. 95/2010 of P.S. Gangapur City, district Sawaimadhopur, on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. Thanvi