a n “Lg “ c$Ma/ V/ ITHE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT OF J%ICATURE AT BILASPUR w.P. Na. ‘7 ‘73 12002 GANPAT‘ S/o BHABHUTI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/o vm. KOUHADIH, PS. Mungeli, Tehsi! Mungeii, Dist. Bilaspur(CG) Vs j./ .‘ ') STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH HOME SECRETARY. DKs BHAVAN, RAIPUR (CG). 2) INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BILASPUR (CG) 3) SUPDT. OF POLICE, m‘ STATION HOUSE OFFTCER ,A PS MUNGELI/DIST BTLASPUR (66 OU BILASPUR DIST. BILASPUR (CG). Ai‘it«r‘ 4) WRIT PETlTlON UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA f l 'W‘ ’ V ’17 iffl/rvd .‘ ? 3g f,” NQ v ‘ ~‘c3TJ g“ w! x ¢ 3mm m ‘31 200 mwwm mrmwéw 30-05-2002 Petitionm‘ by Shri Dhirendra State by Shn' Rs. Koshy, G: Heard on I.A.Nos. 3332/2OC 333 1/ 2002 (applicau'on for hearin The applications are allowed The. petitionm“ is the father submitted that the age of Sher Sin 2001. A répott was lodged to that mortsm was also conducted. Learned counsel for the pe ' Apex Court reported in A.I.R. 200 , f - Vs - state of Punjab. The rele below: “The grievance of registering a case agam's persons but the police 11 and never put the 1a therefore, having failed ' High Court to get a cas approached this Court. issued' the appearance. Though appealing for the State o there had been an enquiry, Mishra, Advocate. \vt. Advocate. 2 (application for urg'eggtehearing) and if g during summer vacation). responde ts of the deceased Sher Singh. It is ‘gh is 15 years and he died on 24,09- ed‘ect. Autopsy was conducted. Post 'oner relies upon a judgment of the Page 21 13 inlthe case of Mohindro portion of the judgment is quoted a appellant is that though she has approac ed the authority for the alleged accused er registered a case in moh'on, and an attempt in the registered she has suant to the notice have entered e learned counsel Puniab stated that We fail to [dew m v t e XI-HC—22 33W, WWI? W EEI m wzN “(W/203%} WWW WW émfarranéw m mmw /W/ n \ ( .ccordance with law. understand as to how thvrc can bc an enquiry w1thout reglstenng a cnmjnal case. On th6 facts alleged, 1t trajnspms that the appellant approached the police for registeling a case and get'the allegation investigated into and yet for no reasons whatsoever the police failed to register the case In the aforesaid premises, y 4" we allow this appeal and direct that a case bef ’ registered on the bas1s of the report to be lodged by the appellant (it the police station Within a week from today and thereafter the“ matter will be duly investigated into and appropriate action be taken accordingly. The appeal is dispos ed of accordingly.” Having thus considered the hots and circumstances of the case! material available on record and. it , the matter mgr Mr) be inquired . into by any oftker not below the rank of Deputy auperintendent of Police, Mungeli and the said omcer shall submit a letailed report to that effect. The L View of the judgment of the Ape Court in the case of Mohindro — Vs - State of Punjab (Supra) In View of this order, I.A.Nos 3331/2002 and 3382/2002/stan ‘ f‘dihm W' sposed of. Certified copy as per rules. T 13 Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge [dew ’ matter shall proceed strictly in W x i