... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.505 OF 1991 FIRST APPEAL NO.505 OF 1991 FIRST APPEAL NO.505 OF 1991 ...................................................... Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Orders Registrar’s orders ...................................................... Shri Rajesh Patil i/by Shri A.K.Abhyankar for the Appellant. Mrs G.P. Mulekar, A.G.P for the State. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. ABHAY S. OKA, J. ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATE : JANUARY 11, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 11, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 11, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . For the reasons separately recorded in the judgment, following is the operative part of the order: : O R D E R : : O R D E R : : O R D E R : (i) The market value fixed by the Trial Court by the impugned Judgment and Award is confirmed. (ii) In addition to the said market value, the Appellant- Claimant will be entitled to statutory benefits under section 23(1-A), 23(2) and 28 of the ... 2 ... Land Acquisition Act, 1894. (iii) The Trial Court will calculate the amount of compensation payable to the Appellant- Claimant on the basis of this Judgment within a period of four months from the date of receipt of writ of this judgment. (iv) The Appellant Claimant will be entitled to proportionate costs of the reference as well as this Appeal from the State of Maharashtra. (v) Appeal is partly allowed in above terms. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE