WWW é é; Hemant Kunmr Netam 3/0 Shri $urya Bhcm sing}; ,Ngzm Aged abou: 30 years Mutton ~Asstst¢nt Veterinary . Wt: Vetennam Emmi Bastar{C.G.j Darbha, Block Darbha Dust- /, LState of Chhattisgark Through ,_ Secretary , Department of Veterinaty Deuetopment Mantralaya’ D.K.S. Bhawan, Ragaur{C.GJ / 2. CallectorgBastar Distn‘ct Bastar {(2.6} /’ ‘ 3. Deputy Director 3 Veterinary Serukes, Bastan, District - E w/ , x (W W) Bhstar f C;G} £';",x, I ‘T TINI‘I HIGH COURT OF CHHATI‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 447 of2011 PETITIONER : Dr. Hemant Kumar Netam. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETlTlON UNDER AR‘HCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate for the petitoiner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Dy. AG. for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 25 day of January, 201 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 15.07.2010 (Annexure P/l), ihe petitioner, working as Assistant Veterinary Surgeon at Development Bloclg Darbha, District Bastar. has been transferred to Development Block Dabhra, District Janjgir-Champa, on administrative gounds. However, the petitioner has not yet been relieved to join the new place of posting. Ms. Pandey submits that once the order of transfer has been passed, it is for the government to ensure that it is complied with immediately. She relies on a decision of the Supreme Court in Sreedam Chandra Ghosh v. State ofAssam & others’, in support of her contention that if the order is not complied with, a direction can be issued for enforcement thereof. Shri Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the » State/respondents submits that that if the transfer order dated 15.07.2010 (Annexure P/l) is still in existence and has not been complied with, appropriate steps would be taken to comply with the order. If the aforesaid transfer order is still in existence, the govemment is under an obligation to comply with the same at once. It is accordingly directed that the transfer order shall be complied with forthwith, within a period oftwo weeks. Accordingly,this petitionis disposed of. /,,r>»~“ ’ ‘ Sd/4 > //—- “I,” sh K. Agd‘ho‘“ Sat'i Judge 1 (1996) 10 scc 567 .