^^ SiaSBI-Bi Mlli ; .fe^^l w ^ ualsi s^ HiGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BiLASPUR W.P. No. 1519 of 2003 Petitioner Digvijay Singh, S/o D. P. Singh, Agcd about 35 ycars, K/o Ncw Shanti Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Versus Respondent Municipql Corporation, Raipur, 'l hrouRh its Uoinmissioncr, Municipal Corporation, Raipur District Raipur (CG) WRIT PETITSOB UNDBR AR.TICLE 2267327 OFTHE CQKSTmJTION OF INDIA <5% 00 : Hon'blc Shri Sattet K. Agnihotri, J Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri Kashif Shakeel, Advocate for fhe rcspoadent. OK UEK ( Passed on tTiis 22nd day ofAiigiist, 2007) 1. This Court oa 9.11,2006 passed the foUowiag oider:- "Accordia^ to learaed coitasel for the petitioner, ttie petitioner beiug disabled, was allotted 225 square feet laad for running a caiiteen in Gaadhi Udyaii, Raipur on 10.9.1998. The Fetitioner was removed from fiie disputed place without aay aotice by order dated 25.4.2003. At present fhe petitioner has no place to operate his business. The State beiag a weUare State is under aa obligation to rehabiUtate disabled persons. It appeare ia the same spirif, the petitioaer was allotted a smail piece of land for eaming his inconie and fhat was fh.e only source of income of the petitioner. The petitioner has beeti thrown out witfaout being provided an alteniative place for rehabiiitatiou. In view^ of fhe above, the respondent-Corporatioa is directed to arraage an altemative land for rehabilitatioa ofthe petitioner, who is protected iinder the proviaions oflaw aad to file an affidavit withia a period ofthree weeks.*' Sd/- Satish K. Agmhofri Judge