IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Arb. Case No. 25 of 2011 Decided on: 8.7.2011 M G Mehta Constructions Pvt. Ltd. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. J.S. Bhogal, Senior Advocate with Mr. T.S. Bhogal, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : It is represented by Mr. J.S. Bhogal, learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the Arbitrator stands appointed. However, interim order dated 28.4.2011 shall continue till the petitioner files a claim petition and move an appropriate application before the Arbitrator. 2. In view of the directions/observations made hereinabove, the present arbitration case stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge July 8, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?