IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH JULY 2007 / 3RD SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 22749 of 2007(G) -------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. SONY JOSE, VIIITH SEMESTER COMPUTER SCIENCE, S.C.M.S., KARUKUTTY. 2. DONIA TILGY GEORGE, VIIITH SEMESTER COMPUTER SCIENCE, S.C.M.S., KARUKUTTY. 3. SANAL SUNNY, VIIITH SEMESTER CIVIL ENGINEERING, S.C.M.S., KARUKUTTY. 4. MILTON C.J., VIIITH SEMESTER CIVIL ENGINEERING, S.C.M.S., KARUKUTTY. 5. DEVANAND A.V., VIIITH SEMESTER COMPUTER SCIENCE, S.C.M.S., KARUKUTTY. 6. ASHOK KUMAR, VIIITH SEMESTER ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS ENGG., S.C.M.S., KARUKUTTY. 7. GEORGE JOFFIN JOY, VIIITH SEMESTER COMPUTER SCIENCE, S.C.M.S., KARUKUTTY. 8. DEEPAK S.MENON, VIIITH SEMESTER COMPUTER SCIENCE, FISAT, MOOKANNUR. 9. AUSTON V. PAYYAPILLY, VIIITH SEMESTER COMPUTER SCIENCE, FISAT, MOOKANNUR. WP(C) NO.22749 OF 2007 :-2-: 10. PARATHEEK MAMMEN JOHN, VIIITH SEMESTER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, ADI SANKARA INSTUTUTE OF ENGG.TECH., KALADY. 11. ILLIPARAMBIL MATHEWS BOBAN, VIIITH SEMESTER COMPUTER SCIENCE, FISAT, MOOKANNUR. 12. M. PARVATHY, VIIITH SEMESTER COMPUTER SCIENCE, FISAT, MOOKANNUR. 13. JAKE K.MATHEW, VIIITH SEMESTER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, ADI SANKARA INSTITUTE OF ENGG.TECH., KALADY. 14. LOYAL PAUL, VIIITH SEMESTER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, ADI SANKARA INSTITUTE OF ENGG.TECH., KALADY. BY ADV. SRI.M.POLY MATHAI SRI.P.CHELLAPPAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.T.A.SHAJI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ WP(C) NO. 22749 OF 2007 - G ------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of July, 2007 J U D G M E N T The petitioners, having been dissatisfied with their results of different Semesters of the B.Tech Examination, applied for revaluation of their answer papers. They complain of delay in completion the revaluation process. 2. The learned Standing Counsel for the University submits that the University would require at least two more months time to complete the revaluation process. 3. After hearing both sides, I direct the respondents to complete the revaluation process for which the petitioners have applied for, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the applications submitted by the petitioners are in order in all respects. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S. SIRI JAGAN, Judge Mbs/ S.SIRI JAGAN, J ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) NO. OF 2001 ------------------------------------ J U D G M E N T DATED:01-06-2007