1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 728 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 861 OF 2006 Ashok Apparao Sindagi........Applicant/Appellant versus Bharat Apparao Sindagi (since deceased through L.Rs.) & ors........ Respondents. Mr. Siddharth Ranghe h/f G.S.Godbole adv. for the Applicants/Appellants CORAM: RANJIT V. MORE, J. DATED : 03rd DECEMBER,2008. P.C.: 1. Civil Application is taken out by the applicants for bringing legal heirs of deceased original appellant Ashok Apparao Sindagi on record. Original appellant died on 23-7-2007 and the civil application is filed on 23-10-2007. Thus the application is within time. Hence civil application is allowed and applicant no.1 is allowed to bring on record the legal heirs of deceased appellant Ashok Apparao Sindagi. Necessary amendments to be carried out within two weeks from today. Civil application is accordingly disposed of. (R. V. More, J.) 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 729 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 861 OF 2006 Ashok Apparao Sindagi........Applicant/Appellant versus Bharat Apparao Sindagi (since deceased through L.Rs.) & ors........ Respondents. Mr. Siddharth Ranghe h/f G.S.Godbole adv. for the Applicants/Appellants CORAM: RANJIT V. MORE, J. DATED : 03rd DECEMBER,2008. P.C.: 1. This civil application has filed by the applicant for permission to applicant no.1 to represent applicant nos. 3 and 4 being their mother as a natural guardian and next friend. It is averred in the application that applicant nos. 3 and 4 are major. However they are mentally retarted and therefore incapable to represent themselves as heirs of original appellant. This averment is supported by the affidavit, and a medical certificate to that effect is also annexed to the application. In these facts and circumstances, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Civil application is accordingly disposed of. (R.V. More, J.)