IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2384 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: August 18, 2009. Smt. Chanchal Pathak & Ors. ...Petitioner(s) v. Parma Nand Khurana & Anr. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. Bedi 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Naveen Daryal, Advocate, for the petitioners. None for the respondents. ORDER M.M.S. Bedi , J. - (Oral): On the last date of hearing, the respondents had been served, however, no one had put in appearance on their behalf. Even today, the respondents are unrepresented. Vide the impugned order dated 15.4.2009, the application of the plaintiff-respondents for amendment of the plaint has been allowed. The petitioner has sought amendment on account of typographical error in the plaint where the first floor has been mentioned as the second floor. By taking advantage of the said inadvertent mistake, the construction has been raised by the defendants on the first floor. The trial court has observed that the amendment is necessary for effective adjudication of the suit and that no prejudice would be caused to the defendants in case the amendment is allowed in the plaint as well as in the prayer clause where additional prayer has been made for demolition of the construction raised during pendency of the case. No illegality is found. Dismissed. August 18, 2009. [ M.M.S. Bedi ] kadyan Judge