1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9803 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11846 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.19972 OF 2008 Shri Popat Keru Salve & anr. ... APPLICANT VERSUS Shri Sambre Vikram Damu & anr. ... RESPONDENTS ----- Shri S.T. Shelke, Advocate for the applicant ----- CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATED : 7th November, 2009. ORAL ORDER : 1. Perused. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. The applicant has preferred the present application contending that bailiff report reflects that notice of respondent No. 1 returned unserved as he was not residing on the given address. Hence, the applicant submits that, after enquiry he has obtained the address of respondent No.1 which is mentioned in the present application. Therefore, the applicant requested that fresh notice be issued to respondent No.1 on the said changed address. 2 3. Considering the contents of the application and since the applicant has given the fresh and changed address of the respondent No.1, it is necessary to issue notice to respondent No. 1 on the fresh and changed address. Hence, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) thereof and fresh notice of Civil Application No.11846/2008 be issued to respondent No.1 on the changed address as mentioned in the present application, returnable within four weeks. Present Civil Application No. 9803/2009 stands disposed of. [SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.] fmp/ca9803.09