IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Review (T) No. 21 of 2008. Decided on: 29th October, 2010. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. ….Petitioners. -Versus- Lalit Mohan. .…Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the respondent. : None. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The O.A. No. 567 of 1996, newly assigned No. CWP(T) 3102 of 2008 has been disposed by this Court in the following manner on 4.3.2009: “With the passage of time and subsequent developments, the present petition has become infructuous. Disposed of as such, with liberty to file an appropriate proceedings for redressal of any grievances, which may have arisen subsequent to the filing of the petition.” 2. Consequently, the present review petition is also rendered infructuous in view of the order passed in the main petition, i.e., CWP(T) 3102 of 2008 (O.A. No. 567 of 1996). Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 29, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?