1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 789 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 599 OF 2010 (Namdeo Ramdas Malode .v. State of Maharashtra) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri Y.B. Mandpe, Advocate for the applicant. Shri C.N. Adgokar, APP for the respondent/State. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. 07TH DECEMBER, 2010. Heard. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the judgment and order is challenged by the applicant/appellant on the ground that the evidence is not properly appreciated by the learned trial Court and the learned Court ultimately came to the erroneous conclusion. He further submits that the applicant is behind the bars since more than one year and the conviction awarded to the applicant/appellant is of five years. He further submits that in view of the pendency of the old appeals, there is remote chance of the appeal filed by the appellant being heard in due course. He further submits that the applicant was on bail during the trial and there is no report against the applicant of misusing liberty granted to him. In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the applicant and for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on bail on the same terms and conditions as in the trial Court with fresh bonds. Hamdast granted. JUDGE *rrg.