IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI FRIDAY, THE 5TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 14TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 27147 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ABIDABEEVI, D/O. ADUL HAMEED RAWTHER, KUZHIVILA VEEDU, KARALIKONAM, ARKKANNOOR P.O. BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENTS: 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE HOME SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHADAYAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, CHADAYAMANGALAM. 3. MUHAMMED YOSUF, CRESENT, T.C.NO.2/581, RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O. 4. CHACKO, AISWARYA GRANITES, ARKKANNOOR P.O., AYOOR. 5. HASSANKANNU,THEKKEKONATHU VEEDU, KARALIKONAM, ARKKANNOOR P.O., AYOOR. 6. PRASAD, VELILALIKAM HOUSE, ELAMEDU P.O., VELLACHAL, KOTTARAKKARA. 7. IBRAHIMKUNJU, K.C.P.HOUSE, KARALIKONAM, ARKKANNOOR P.O., AYOOR, KOTTARAKARA. BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER MR. BENJAMIN PAUL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== W.P.(C)NO. 27147 OF 2008 ============================ DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2008 JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair,J. The petitioner and her husband jointly purchased 3 acres and 50 cents of land in Re-Survey No.119/4 of Edamulakkal village. Apprehending that her husband may assign his share in the property to the third parties, she moved the Family Court and obtained Ext.P2 interim order restraining her husband, who is the third respondent herein, from executing any deed in relation to the said property or transfer the same to third parties or allow third parties to enter into the property. The said order was passed on 22-11-2006. Subsequently, the third respondent has inducted respondents 4 to 7 in the property and they are blasting the granites available in that property. When the petitioner went to the property and objected to the same, she was threatened with physically harm by the persons working there. So, she filed Ext.P3 petition before the police and thereafter, this writ petition is filed seeking appropriate reliefs. WPC. 27147/2008 -2- 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that her husband is violating the order of the Family Court. We feel that the Sub Inspector of Police cannot grant any relief to the petitioner to redress the said grievance. If there is any violation of the order of the Family Court, the petitioner has to move the Family Court itself for reliefs. There is threat to her life,if only she goes to the property and obstructs the quarrying there. Therefore, the prayer of the petitioner for protection for life cannot be granted. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the contentions of the petitioner and her right to move other forums for appropriate reliefs. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE M.C. HARI RANI JUDGE ks.