IN THE H1GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.A.No. a>€>^ /200^ APPELLANT 1.^A) (B) / .(C) p) (E) ^ (F) (G) /; o' (H) ..&^<('I) 1^%<"T) /' ^) ?^-<0 '^^" ..^m/v ^^ o-"' v RESPONDENTS Shanti Bai, Wd/o. Narayan, Aged about 60 years. Indrakumar, S/o. Narayan, Aged about 40 years. Neklal, S/o.Narayan, Aged about 37 years. Krishna Kumar, S/o. Narayan, Aged about 30 years. Tirath Ram, S/o. Narayan, Aged about 24 years. Sita Bai, W/o. Radheshyam, Aged about41 years. Dwarika Bai, W/o. Bhuneshwar, Aged about 34 years. Teman Bai, W/o. Narendra Kumar, Aged about 32 years. Bhuneshwari, W/o. Manohar Ram, Aged about 26 years. Gulapa Bai, D/o. Narayan, Aged about 22 years. Shobhil, S/o. Udaylal Dewangan, Aged about 35 years. Bhairo Prasad, S/o. Udaylal Dewangan, Aged about 30 years, Al] are resident of village Somajhitiya, Tahsil & District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) V E R S U S "1. Shambhu, S/o. Charan, Aged about A5 years, R/o. Mateldieda, Tahsil & District Rajnandgaon. 2. 3. ^" 2.(A) Barma @ Parmanand, S/o. Vikram, Aged about 28 years. Maniram, S/o. Vikram Yadav, Aged about 26 years. (C) Madan Lal, S/o. Vikram Yadav, Aged ' about 24 years. All are resident of Stationpara, l^ahsil & District Rajnandgaon. 3.. r ^ ^ Rameshar, S/o. Sahdev Dewangan, Aged about 35 years, R/o. village Somajhitiya, Tahsil & Districl Rajnandgaon, Presently R/o. Motipur, Rajnandgaon, Tahsil & District Rajnandgaon. Udaylal, S/o. Shivgulam Dewangan, (Dead) Aged about 60 years, I</o. Somajhitiya, Tahsil & District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Tulsibai, W/o. Kisun Dcwangan, Aged about 50 years, J^/o. Somajhitiya, Tahsil & Districl Rajnandgaon (C.G.) SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTIQN 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE XI-HC-22 ^.: N^T^ : R'iich ^nt?T ?b4-<ict)N%<l :^— 'l:l ^. '^[••^'•^^y' I • ' -(!. j' l^^l^l^ ^^•^i^^^ >^.fc|^,^<' *'^^''*^''^ -'•IIHC'II 9HNW tip'Mazumdar,! Acfvocate; ' • ('; 2^A), ^B) &: (€]byIShrl Rakesh AppeKants/Plaintjfls b^St-iri ^-i:i| '^Respondent^DeN^cfants N6,1^ •Ttiakyr,^vocate.^:<.-^^^^^^^ <^^ard 'on M. C:P.No.11i06M 2|OG o^ delay in wher^by w$s fiting thisappeai.^^^^^^^^^^ t This.appeai is prefer^^ judgmerrt;-clatedp6.10.:2004aeSjverecl « : . .•'.". ...' ..•'.'^ "•,...:.,..• "^•"••*'''..•. in ^Civi 1 Aj3peai .Nb, ^ 42-A; of 2003 wt- .dated 1 Q;04200-^ fnGiyilSuttNo:-228 Judge Class-1), Rajnaridgaon plaintifNappetlantswasjdjsmisseci.w^ "\ •./ * -•'' .. .•• Leamed counael for the afeealwasfitecipnl^02;2005anci^ this appeal. The cays^ forthe delay] (!yi.C.P.No;11Q6 0f 2QO©rXWat1:h^ oounselintheiowercoyrftbg^^^^^ ^fjjing seoond^appeal. ;Ho^A^^e 'th^fjlewasmixedup^w^^ would take $Dme tii^ spmetimeto preparetfteseGon^ an^afRdavit,\GfSliejkh^H^^ Stiri K. Bharad^ ^i^f^^ ^m<nf^i^^^fa<^ :^AN^TfeTHl|l^ •-C- ^plainti^appetianfs against^^^^ by District ^vdge^i^ ^ereby the j^dgment and decree i|-A;of 1997 passed by the 1st Civii the Civi!; Si.ijt filed. by 'the -a1¥iTmed.::;\,['.-::,;.,--;^-^ app^iiants submtts that this secbn^ |here is^cleiay j oF 31 d^ys in fnirig ^srmenxioned inthe appticati^ fappellants tiad instructect thejr tyQf;theyudgmentand;E^reefor ClerkQftheadvosatehaciynformed^ ^ect of records in ttie offi^^^^ l^oynseltfor the apj3ett&lts tobk^ |a(.^;lnEsuipoffN |1ffiie;registered ciCTk o^^^^t F^j|iandg^n, ^ Rajj|iandg^Qn, ^j|l:"-';f^S^i^ •^^ -^^ —r m.}-\ -i~ XI-HC-22 h^'^n^tlRT R^fe'3nt3?T 5tlPW ^ff ^ ^ :^f^^' •'^•'J.v"'-.:.. :- ;?^:W 'r/ «. /^n^yu ^' • 'W^^FTI^I^ :;;^l';:l-'Nlt^:':;'q^^^':':^^:^^ JRWC^^bHlch "'^•^:2W- ^T^^^^^TT< ^^^ is;hot-mentianed.iDthgaffidavlas^^^to Shri K.?^^hara|waj, Advocate^^^^a^^^ of the juclgment and decree^ A certified co^y of the impugned judgr cop^ was promptl^ applied ^on :14.10.2i dehvered to fhe appefiants on ^ the cause assigned tiythe appeitant trljs appeai is^not^ubstantjate^ receivingtheoertiftedcopyoftheiml the appeliants or the Offiee pf their e sijch alpngttrRiei.evtil! 10.02.2005. •-!'| 2006) asalso theaffictavjt^fiieciinsuj semblanceofsufficientcauseToDnot Since there is no :Byffioienf oaU! days ih fiJjrigthisappeal,M.C.P;No,1<|i •1s •dismissed;..'.. •':; :'•. .:.;. :,y^ ^ CQnsequently,f Secood.; ^ c!jsmissed;asvbarredt)y:limjtation/i.^ in the cayse titte trf the appeai, toe(i disposed:of. /. , App^ai ^l ^jwyiT^1^rf<r4^T ;^^^^^^ i^ l^tien-did fheiappellahts instruc |andgaon;togetaGertifiedcopy isai of the entiorsemenf on ttie- pent cieariy shoy^. thsrt -cartified .v> -•.'/ ;•-.' pO^anythecopywas-read [Q04. In this yjew oj|tha^ffl [or.the delay.occasioned in fitirigh it is not shown as to^^^^ )ygned judgment on T9.1 Q. 2004 Eounset remainecl in siumber for ieappltcati6n(M:C.P.Na.,1^D&of )p<orttHereo^donofshow^veaa refemngtheappealwithirrtme; 50 for.cpncioning the dejay o1r31 36/2006 forcondonatipo of d^fa N6..' 30'? of 2006 fe/ also ^o. 2063 of 2006 foramendment ig inccnsequential, ajso stands Sd/- DilipRaosahebDeshmukh 1 ~ Judge .'['^^^&^ •).':.": ^^