0% ' I MEG?“ CQURT C3? £HHATTE5 ”Am‘l ATEKLASWJE B31 Hm’bie Mr.T.P,$harma, 3£ Honi‘bie fiKrRii‘haNwan 33’. Kishore Kumm' 5am ‘ SmtKusgum 80f! JUDQMENT FQR CQNSEDERATEQN Hm’biz Mr?LThenwer gawzaag mam sf Judgman? an i /’"" " sci/- 995T i'!’ fer gronwme- W_=—?r ,_ W, V , «W‘MHW > 7 7 _ _ ‘ HE$H (IR? :QJ QF CHHATTE$§AQH A? EELA$§UR $8: Hon’bia 1W.T,i’. $harma é“: Hcn‘bEa Mr. g.” :V. Agaégm Aggikan‘r Kishgr‘e Kama.” Saba, 5k: Sakbga! Saw; Aged 36 Year's: R/o Ga Cabin’ BJV‘LV. Charouda, Tehsii Pawn, Qish‘éc? Dgrg (QQ-Z) VersaAs Rgsggndgm §mi¥é5sum 8m, WM Kgsher'e Kumar Non—ap‘micam Sahu, Aged abom‘ 28 years,‘»R,/c Viiiage K‘hudmudt Tehsii Pamri, Disfrici' Burg (CEj (Ems? APPEAL UNDEQ sEcnQN 19(1) @F THE FAAAiLy mums AcT 1984) §r€seiw : ’W Sammy-g $gé'au, cgansgi fer {ha appzEEant MnSaMosh Vadut‘ counsei for ‘rhe respondent : "jam2m o @‘ri‘ Ocmben 2009} J {Deiivered Th2 judgmzm ef ifha Caur‘r was dagvnmri by T.?.5harm£, 3,:- 1. This firs? appea! umier Saction 1§ (1) of 1‘ha Famiiy tiaur‘rs Act, 1984 {in s§19w¥ ‘€'§aa Adi, 1984') is dirzdad against? ‘mz judgmgm ahd decree §a?ed 11.12.2G06 passad by fhe Third Addifiom! Principal? Judge, Fam..y Court Burg, in Case Na.2,7A,i20f36 Mangrgby & wheraby ieamad Third Addi?i9m! Principai Judge has dismissad 1?:2 suif far diverse . fiigd an behaiF 91f ‘kha apgaiianf. 5x) Bria? fad’s kgding 1’0 fihng cf this appeai as gar pLading 9f irEGe garfies are tha? i‘he @pegiam’ and #hz reswndenf are iagalhl mudded wifz ané husband. Marriaga was parformed on 25.4.1993. Bath fhe pnm‘ias haw discharged fiqeir marlin! abliga‘rien. 0n 4.1Q1§94 re5penc3am’ gaye birth to 0mg chM which @1515 abnormai and af’?2r someiima I chM died. As a ra$uhr o marim! = ebii-tr?icn 9 v fiqe reswnéam r delivared mu; ghiid mmgly, Ravishmkar 5ahu and Murii Mamhar Sahu. We agpeEamf is a mambgr 9f jam? fami!y and was re$iéing wifh his Qfher fgmiy memba‘rs, but 1:53- reswnéen‘r was no? agrza ‘m We wifh gain? ‘arr i§y m? ‘a‘he agpaiian? and usad i’o g9 fa her muwma! hGMP fraquen‘l’iy, in the» yam" QQDI wifheui‘ any cause, fhv rgsgondan‘!‘ wan‘f m ‘nzr magma? Mus- and refusaé m came back fikd an appiicafim bgfore» we 5Llb Divis‘gom! Magist which “’fna raspendan% has maée $33-2 aiiagatirm agains? the appellant am4 rg§u$ed 1:9 go M1?! him The resgmd%f '25 a waman 9f fimid mind n Rant? is mt? proggr. She is 'm habi? of insu§f§ng mid defaming the wgaEmt $§nz ugad T7- campei fhé aw“ ire igave his jam? fam'iy muse mad membgrs. Finaib; an sha quarraiad wait¥a fha mggeiimi‘ and his famiiy mambzr‘s m3 iafir E122" ma“?r§mma§al hausa wéirheu? :H'aere baing any mu3a. The £12m? has Wigd his iavei , has? ifo aemnm. ,f m‘isz , but he did no? suzca,r§. Bzhmtiar m‘ 1&2 reggondzn‘? is cruei wi‘rh 'irhe aggpeilan? and an flag kass av? :ruaify, fag ggpeihn? has fiEzd a sui? fer diver/:3 {1) {A} m? ‘lri'aa Hiadu Marriagz Act 195§ {in Sher? 4, h S RN appe 1km? 1e, Rim?! in her imzhgvkw ni. 34 G “K3 “mg. w—E t am? unAer 5aatim' ‘1Haa Ac?! 1955“ ,u...’. resam respenrlen‘r has cameswd 11w suit? and has admi'rwed marr§s§gs dgiivary' 9f chi§dram by? spicdh/ aHeggd fhat sha has MT - cemmm'eé , H any arugafy ’ span ma § appehani‘, E1 Lug? The agpeglsn? i and his rg%a?’ives used f9 cgmmi? crual'l‘y and irormre uson her and aiways uszd 1‘9 damama‘I af d0we~y, They wars m? sm'isfied with the :iswry givgn by 1&9. parems cf :fii'aa rsspemigm: The appeusm? aways used iro dememé Rs.2,QG,QQO!- fmm the respgndenf whisk. was milr pass‘ab2e fer her. The appe§§emf has sakes signafure in same papers grad hcs w gs‘f ausi'gd Thea raspmdan‘!‘ from his i'amse 5kg is reaa‘y 2m live w§fh we appgHani‘ and discharge her- marim! abliga‘rim wifh d§gnity, bu? thz appaliam? is no? rzady to d§scharge his mgr-Ha! nbiigaficn. 4. Gn $2 basis of mlarmems mada by the games, issuzg mare framed and af‘?er affgrding an appgr’mniw 9f harming is the parfbas, The suit? fer éive-rga was dismEss-d by Tha Tnrd Addi‘riom! Principal J“ g2 Family Court Burg. 5‘ We have heard learnggi c0un£5§ fm‘ irhg parfigs arid pamsed ‘E'he juégmzaf and dzcreg impugned md record nT’ fha Cam"? bekmi. 3‘f w“. Laamed caunsgl far "ma aggaihn‘r vzhemanfly arguéd "thm’ fag respmden? §s a wcrmcm 9*;5 :Hmid mmé She < m? ready To !ive wi‘th fhz appg!!amf hi: Ms join‘!‘ famiiy hausg abng with mhgr members of the family. Shg used 1'0 cgmgge! ‘iéaa agpe§ianf f9 §i,e separafeiy fmm his 313E211? famiy hausa mad membgrs. Har behaviar is cruei and she uwr‘i 1’0 mmmif crugH'y upen ker husbandlépgeiiani. Slhe is in hgbii‘ To ieave fine i’IQL‘e 0f the apfseiian‘? frgquzniiy wifhou? any cause and when ‘rhe .ppgiian‘i “triad ‘L‘-a sail her aack, siign sha refused. The aggeiiam has never demancied any dowry er mane/ Marriage was gerfarmed In Adarssi'! Vivaia. hiji‘i‘hau'ir aay demaaa er accepfarsce a1? dowry. 7. Gn fi’ie a'i'her hand, ieamee cauase! far ‘ihe resaandent suppar?ed the d arid argued ‘i’ha? fhe apgeilam ané :rhe resaandenf are iegaiiy Weuaed u i §he was iiviag LAIET’h ‘i'he apaeiiani“, bu? she appeliam 'i’a camwn crueity aha Torture agar! he? in cannec‘rian wifin. demaad 9f uawry 0f Rs.2,0Q,DQD/- and has Qus‘i'ed her an; {inaliy she appeiiam cussed 'iiae res‘pandem, therefare, she is g in her parenfs hause am siii! she is ready and wiiiing Ta .e rzi husband. The respanden‘i has auiigafian and she is ready #a diseharge her _r a P M a he!“ “Ifai nhhgni'mn and r'MdV +0 W9 W‘T3'1 i‘ha (spy 1m? mi 1m aursz “fie!" miner chiid‘ w Tn order 1'9 apprac'mu +h9 cnmamsrM 0* +h par?ie.s, we have exammad 'g‘ha eviémce wdéucwd n hahaw hz nar'rizs. Lawful marriaog bairwaen pawws m m+ r5!sph+9d SWW 0* rhidrn‘m nu? 01" r \Madimk in? fhe nar‘r'aes is a§sg> new rimnnwA Tho r! am NF dwnw? zs i: await)! mid f0 have been cammi’rred by The r 3U ,,Q r. ‘3a. D 3‘‘ 314A m. ’D ‘ :5 in respandmi The awa¥imf F: has ammineé himsalf : f1§ed rm affidavit rmd ans supnnrtd his pEgading. Tm in'sé cress-examimfien, he. has 9:? his gra¢¢—9vgmmnhnn ha n¢ 4g§nspd that 6 jumps wri‘hgnt h fFa wa<9 f n w? +0 har- pgxwrrk hglecp (ma whpn 5‘3ggi‘fi‘gamy a$ml+f¢f3 '1'!" 1’ h? i3 Cx ar cf joint fam§!y. 131 para—13. whgy Vww m w» nbrewra‘ aousw Q‘f ‘i’ha resnandent fa? faking her bagkw i’ken 5he Qui‘ (.1 cmdmm ”thaw +m’ amp» laM <hauid leave his 1--:“ r 3 i'wm‘wrs. Tbam oniy sha wi‘3‘. Ma wk?! her. He, has denigd Tha adverse sugggsfznn cw? camméssimé 0f 1%? cruelty by himsaif and his 01har famiiy member‘s. in palm-é Qf his affidavit he has. dehmad ihaf whehzver he irrizd fm“ ghysim§ ralmian i’han sha used “m 9,153 ghd samahme ha wed to cremmn‘ 40M? md a‘ha ha$ hot dischargg Emi’i hn A msad 'i'hm *ha resgendem paham’: mud usad. filthy language and 31.. ha? mar‘a‘td. abiigafxon 3mg, ‘aasf *wg venr< His Mm?“ Nams‘n h n M’ev‘vzm the!!! she aka) mi$behaved ' I anti qu m h a4: hm" rvMs—evnmmafion, $he has “mitiud ‘rha'!’ aha is; mghb m rim 4w hw hearfj quarrehng seuhd cf T‘he raspohdeh’i: wh'h high 4: g Jehrv mm quarreiing ssund of me‘Qharf cad ms‘rev' m—iaw nf 'h'm gmpvHcm”? vmh low frequgncy. Jaya D :‘H‘o mupparwd 'the \Ier5ier‘s of *rhe {PW-3) friehd of “tha appziiani, has 1 ZQOa ha wad gaiha hy sgn nf ha? fima fha ra$p9ndanf wa$ no? gresgn? and has m b g ‘ a V “a i J ‘m .. “ , ggng “M +hg k‘msp 3% hvr 'Fg‘d'wr‘ M ‘ , QTywr- nampiv gfhu Ram 5ahu. Hg aimg wk?! girlie?- ‘ a?sg?is wen? m the hause 9f Je‘mu Ram $ahn n?! §nquirat$ ‘irhé ma??er winwz tha resgandgm‘ rgfbiged Te 90mg baét‘ *E'Q iiige hwse n¥ we appeHaM, +hen father of The aggelian‘!‘ tald The fespmdan? ‘khaf if shg is not? rearjy Te live wifh the appelécmt, than 5%; give n wrifing gnd 'rhen a? the insfnnce m: ”w wsg ndant 19+?” {*:¥ \ i s prepared i2: which $he sigaad. Ha has depesed “’rhm he haE irr§ed “m carrying-a +‘ne respondent, bu'r ska was no? ready *Q IIW wW” igw n g .. €' Ha hg< AM d ?'rl adverse 5uggt> Inn 'rka‘l‘ EKPJE was ”lav-“en at $112 insfance 9f the agpahm and h§s fmher and fhey have fake?! $igmi‘wa m.‘ 111m resgganden‘!‘ and Jgfhu Ram wé?hauf riIsHMIm Tine :Gn‘l‘t’nfs n‘F dnrumoni‘: A” qtLprQ‘ (m: ragga hy ’fka «ppawrm'f and h}: wrfngssgs warp d d 1 ‘Eé’ae agpdiayi"? mild r ”kwwg 4 Te cQmmai‘ cruei ”his"? mad n pr! m marreli ‘§‘§qzn she N qgpp. arr? wn< rm+ rmwr‘v The, a? aEgn‘if ha 5i liharqi‘ak J13 Midi'fnUy lef‘? ker and has fiizd an argyésafwn 1‘ fan“? 141a Silb hwlsmnal Mrnmfr‘n'tp Pg-rrm Qhp h 5'. pareami muse wifhom wisheg e?’ hgr 1" hmhaud, $12 Eon: admiffad in mm i2 m? he" a n s¢xamlnn+mn fhn+ ‘r n F i . by irha rasnendent in her aviriarace on agfidav§T A A. d p 32d that § ”.5 mV-“ .1- fh s eq_as:h3d ?§ae ppalian'!’ wl‘H’! vww Tn avmd d3? fa ha s.auid We sd'aamfély f m h” win‘hv“ hm 14w i: she has nevzr' gang. m has“ gangmri and raini'was 9f h” her .‘usbgzd famiiy is big famiiy, (:ms'isfinn 1.3 membzrs and her hu$band always garmii’s $3 g9 her panama! hous_ in fzs?iva!s and Q'ir%ar ocmsiem. §he has admi??ed i?! para. 13. 9f ha cr ss exnmmn‘l'mn Whau 512a" husbami has fiizd an appHcai‘ion Eaafore the Sub DiviSiana§ MagEMz‘fz, 1%‘mn where she appeared and aghhmad +hn'i' hm" r| H n ban? hor ‘Hqar-afnrv ha will ngt go wi‘rh he? husband. $ha has admi?fed irha? ghe is residing gepamizh/ smra 19 ?Qf1'1 ‘M‘n ha? husbanui bani- has denigd fha sugge$f§en thud: ms b thg apggeiiam has no+ damandpa Rs 2 QL‘ (){BGL 51w h < <h Ficai!y arwfw'i m Myra—14$ 9f hgr cross-axaminatim that she i$ n01: ready 1:9 iive with has" husband dang wifh his family member's, but if 'the appeiian‘r bnves his ‘nrpw and mm? ‘awiv house, 'rhw’ si’w m Wady f0 ii‘ga wifh ‘aer husband. §=a¢mm a1” crueity mud tor-mm has gist) been sugperi‘ed by the respoad‘zmr w§fnes3 Agar Singh, fafhar 0f fgqe esp . dmv? A? l‘m denigd ‘Zrha sugggs?im i'haf due in) ham“; wark m in—iawg hause 9f "rhg r' smndaw‘t 5%9 14 no? nh‘a *9 wcr‘k m nkr an inws fherefsre, she used #9. Emvz her mafmmama! nausa frequen'riy. .T?1e Cir . e d .a f d'avwce is bwed 0n tha gmuind ’ef crue‘l'h/ and deser?im amilabia under- SzcTmn 1? f'l) (m) and (ib) 9f fhe Act 1955 whiz” a d a Mark “13 hwomw —(1‘\ Am! marmgne cmpminiagd Magi-h r- f 9r affer The commencamem cf ‘rhts Ac? may on a ne'rrhon nresemed 0y elmer The musnand or Tne vme Dz aagsoivea Dy a aecree OT dixmrm rm Th9 m‘wnd +hf’1' +lw gfhar garb;- hause am; (i) xxx my _ sow xxx (ia) has, after fhz sciemimisafion of fine marriage, frew’red ?he paii‘icner WHh cmeh‘y; 0r (Eb) h d semfed +he Mfrl'ronw‘ 4w a mn+imLou< mriad of rm? less than 1'wo year‘s immedmfeiy precedma The PresehTGTEGR OT Ti’le pETHion, OY' XXX XXX XXX. XXX ‘\r \ $ Thg appeiian? has dam-sari in paras 3, 4,. 5 and 6 of ‘thz evidence an f‘F yl'l' rph‘hng +n fg5igwmn c Hy; 51a» hgc !pwi!eri fnka al n ..on 9f beating, RIITJ\ U}Tot :mI; D. *3-2 w a 43 31 (3‘ E‘ 3: H- ‘3‘ w h« o ‘5N E' m h« ::9€ 2' U‘ <~ it sa ab' 's'va w rda, VhIET—m fc) Whenever he Took the respandem in socia§ funcfion, 'khan in pubija §!aczs and in satia! funcfEon she. usgd 1'9 insuh’ the gnnallnn-i- Wm.-.” by -, \ a r - . u (d3 J22. mas residing with the: appeilan? $ince mm year's, bu? sha as no? caopemted fer physica! reirxrign mad when The appe§£anf tried for physical relatiam fhen she 'mis’red his mala organ and she Ems no? cnopemted far- ghysicg! rekrrian since ins? :Pwe years. In par-—1é 9f his crnss—e.amina‘tien, fna appeiinn‘r has adminad inn? he has mksn fhe rzsieende-nf to Dengnrgarh, to his reim'ives heusz oi? the time of marriage. end nne 'i'ime a? Raigur, bu? she has n0? used any fiifhy innguage, bu? when they came ‘ro their hause fhen she r. illt i T1 . m abuse and that? tea after- one ar- mla manjhs, when any aaeasian arises. He has aiso admi'i'fed in para-16 Thai during gain? residence viii!!! i’he respondent she has never refused for physical .The appellant has stated in para-13. of his evidence that serious quarrei between him, The respand‘en‘i, his hrafher, sisier-in-iaw and moiher has faken hiace‘ The appeiiah‘i has aise deft: respanden? has tried fa assault? him and she brake bangles, maiguisui'ra and washed sindaari but The aggeiianf has admitted :rhat Just after the incident the respondent went tn her father’s eider brother house, at that time she was weeping. He immediately sent her mother fer ceiling the respandent back whom she answeredthat she will came after sametimei Again he sent tn his elder son Rayishankar whens she alses tald that she will come after sametimei but when he alang with his father went ta the hause of the elder brother of the father of the reshandent, then she refused ta came. These statements/admission of the appellant in para-14$ at his evidence are sufficient to suffice the allegatiah of cruelty and tiara-13 of evidence/admission of the appellant shows that the resgondent has not eemmitted torture upon the appellant, but the appellant and their relatives has committed torture upon her and as a re-_:!:r she wen? to The hause an? her fa?h2r's ewe!- bro+h9r DNpi‘w misi ska has no? insuH’ed gr condemned the mothzr of The appeHnn+ 9r his son and simgiy she fold That shg wiH came. affer same‘rimP Thase sm‘reme-ms are sufficien‘r TO shew that thg raspn? rasponrien‘!‘ has n9? commiTfe-d any crush}! ugon :Phe apgeHm‘t. 5kg has no? deserfed tha appgiian‘!‘ wifhau'r any cause. 13. The respondent has admit’red in her- evidence i‘hm‘ she is n9? ready m ’y §§ve wifh fhe appellant dang wifh his gain? femiiy cansgs?ing 13 members but she is ready TO live wifh fhe appelian‘r seaward}! fmm fhe famih; af ‘rhe appeilan‘r. The aHegation of cruel‘ry made by fhe appelian‘!’ and dismayed by the agaeiian? himseif shows fast 14w apgeihm' - filed a pe‘i‘i‘i‘ian for- decr'ee af divarae withau? n 25' 3{ u: graund mxaileble under Sectian 13 0f The Ad, 1955. The apaeiianfihas‘ no? fiied any aeti‘i’ian far resfim’rian af conjugal! rights, but? reasnn bes? knawn ta the .apeiiam fhai' he. has deiiber‘ateiy deleted aiterna‘m ciaim af restimtian of conjugal rights originally made in his alainf. A 14. Affer apareeia'ring the eyidenee available an record, the Coar‘r belnw .as dismissed 'l'he suit for dissaluliaa of marriaae by decree of J I divorce. 15.Far fhe foregoing reasons, we are of ‘i’he considered view Thai +he Third Addifiana! Principal Judge, Family Caurt Durg has no? cammifl'ed any illennlify or infirmi‘l‘y in dismissing the petitian for dissalu‘iian 9f marriage by decree af divarce. We do nai- find any merit in 'ihe appeal. The appeal is liable ‘l'a be dismissed and i‘l is v3- e , Sd/_ R.L. Jhanwar Judge Decree be drawn up accordingly. l‘\ l 1, T.P.Sharma l Judge Sd/— B/