1 36cp251-11 rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 251 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. ..... None for the petitioner. Mr. A. A. Garge for respondent Nos.1 and 2. ..... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 22, 2011. P.C.: None appears for the petitioner. Even on last date, none appeared for the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for the first and second respondents has tendered affidavit in reply of the second respondent. 2. The breach alleged is of an undertaking of the respondents recorded while disposing of a suit before Lok Adalat. The undertaking was that before demolishing the structure of the petitioner, the respondents shall follow due process of law. The allegation in the petition is that without following the due process of law, 2 36cp251-11 the structure has been demolished. The affidavit in reply of second respondent discloses that the demolition was carried out at the instance of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation. He has invited attention of the Court to the communication dated 16th May, 2011 issued by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation addressed to the Senior Inspector of Police of Rabale Police Station. In view of the statements made in the affidavit of the second respondent, no case is made out to proceed against the respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Petition is accordingly disposed of. (A.S.OKA, J.)