1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WP No. 1569 of 2011 Hariom v. Hon’ble CJSD and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr N.S. Warulkar, Adv for petitioner Coram: B. P. Dharmadhikari & A. P. Bhangale, JJ Dated: 24th August 2011 1. This Court has already shown indulgence by issuing notice on 30th March 2011. Notice was made returnable on 13.4.2011. Office endorsement dated 31.6.2011 shows that notices are received back as service could not be effected for want of time. Thereafter petitioner has not taken any steps though a period of more than one and half months has expired. 2. Petitioner has not filed any order-sheet as to why the trial Court is not in a position to proceed further with the trial of suit. Suit of of the year 2005 and in normal circumstances, suit ought to have been disposed of by this time. Petitioner has not pointed out efforts made by him to expedite suit. 3. In this situation, we are not inclined to interfere with the petition at this stage. With liberty to the petitioner to move 2 the trial Court for expeditious disposal of civil suit and to approach this Court if the petitioner is not satisfied with the further process, petition stands dismissed. Certified copy expedited. Judge Judge joshi