ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.392 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.392 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.392 OF 2007 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO. 182 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 182 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 182 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.P.B.Shah for the Applicants. Mr.Mandar Limaye for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 13th June, 2008 : 13th June, 2008 : 13th June, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Considering the averments made and in view of the questions of law as raised, at this stage of the proceedings, it is necessary that parties to maintain status-quo in respect of the suit property Gat No.617, Portion 54 R. till the decision of the Second Appeal. 2. The Civil Application is allowed, accordingly. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]