..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2180 OF 2008 Nehrullal Karamtullal Shekh. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.Shreeram Shirsat, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 5th September, 2008. DATED : 5th September, 2008. DATED : 5th September, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate appointed for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in Sessions Case No.78 of 2005 pending before the Sessions Court at Thane. The said case pertains to C.R.No.124 of 2004 of Vashi Police Station. The said case is mainly under Sections 302, 366, 364, 201 of IPC. 3. The learned APP states that in this case the charge has been framed and the complainant has ..(2).. been examined. Looking to the facts of this case and the fact that the trial has started, I am not inclined to grant bail at this stage. Application is rejected. Trial expedited. Trial to be completed as far as possible by 31st January, 2009. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)