CLCON No. 71/2009 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. This contempt petition, under Section 12 of Contempt of courts Act, has been filed by the petitioner for summoning the respondents and punishing them for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court dated 01.04.2009, in writ petition no. 291 (S/S) of 2009, Shishupal Pandey & others vs. State of Uttaranchal & others. Heard Sri A.D. Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Manav Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that inspite of the order dated 01.04.2009 passed by this Court the respondents are not permitting the petitioner to join the service. The relevant portion of the impugned order dated 01.04.2009 reads as follows: “Learned counsel for the petitioners states that order impugned has already been withdrawn vide order dated 25.02.2009 and respondents are permitting all employees to join their service. In view of the aforesaid statement, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.” Perusal of impugned order shows that this Court has not passed any direction regarding joining of the petitioners. It is only statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner that order impugned has been withdrawn vide order dated 25.02.2009 and respondents are permitting all employees to join their service. In view of the aforesaid, contempt is not made out against the respondents. Hence, I do not find any justification to continue the contempt proceedings against the respondents. Accordingly, contempt petition is dismissed. Notices issued against the respondents are hereby discharged. (B.C.K., J.) 24.06.2009 SP