IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2009 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 11846 of 2009(A) --------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- INDUKALA CHANDRALAL . C., CHIRATHARA, CMC-6, CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.K.KARTHIKEYA PANICKER SMT.DAYA K. PANICKER RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, MG UNIVERSITY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.11846 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 8th day of April, 2009. JUDGMENT Heard the standing counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. Petitioner was a regular degree student in the NSS College, Changanassery. Initially the dispute was regarding her eligibility to appear for the University Examinations. The college took the view that she was short of attendance and therefore was ineligible. Finally the matter was considered by a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.721/09. When the writ appeal was considered the petitioner expressed her desire to appear as a private candidate and accordingly the University was directed to consider the application for registration. 3. The University considered the application and passed Ext.P5 order. A reading of the order shows that the application made by the Petitioner was defective for want of WP(c).No.11846/09 2 required documents. If that be the factual position, the University cannot be faulted for the view it has taken in Ext.P5. However, the counsel for the petitioner submits that on receipt of Ext.P5 the petitioner has fled Ext.P7 application and produced the first year mark list and remitted the required fee. It is stated that on 1.4.2009 the petitioner has also got the transfer certificate from the College. 4. Evidently it was for want of the transfer certificate, the first year mark list and the remittance of the required fee that the application made by the petitioner was declined to be considered by the University by Ext.P5 order. Now that according to the petitioner except producing the transfer certificate, all other defects have been cured. Therefore, it is only appropriate that the University should consider the matter on the petitioner producing the transfer certificate as specified in Ext.P5. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the petitioner shall along with a copy of this judgment produce transfer certificate, in which event the University shall consider Ext.P7 application made by the petitioner for registration as a WP(c).No.11846/09 3 private student and pass orders thereon without any further delay. vi (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE WP(c).No.11846/09 4