IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 26TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 4TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 28722 of 2008(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- RAMSHAD.T.V, THAZHE VADAKKEDATH, (P.O)CHEMMARATHUR(PO)VADAKARA, CALICUT. BY ADV. SRI.C.VALSALAN SRI.K.RAKESH ROSHAN SMT.THUSHARA.V RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPPALAM, REP.BY REGISTRAR. 2. THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPPALAM. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPPALAM. SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN, STANDING COUNSEL FOR UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V. GIRI, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 28722 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 26th day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner appeared for the 3rd Semester B.Tech Examination conducted in December, 2007 and 8th Semester conducted in June, 2008 . He did not secure the required marks for one of the subjects in the 3rd Semester and two papers in the 8th Semester. He sought for revaluation. The result of the revaluation has not been declared so far. Hence this writ petition. 2. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner Sri.C.Vathsalan and Sri.P.C. Sasidharan for the University. It is only appropriate that the University publishes the result at the earliest. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to publish the result of the revaluation of the papers sought for by the petitioner, at least, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. (V. GIRI, JUDGE) ttb