IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Rev. (T) No. 111 of 2008. Decided on: 29th October, 2010. Vijay Kumar. ….Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and others. .…Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : None. For the respondents. : Mr. P. M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Since the mother of the petitioner was already in Government service, the case of the petitioner could not be considered for compassionate appointment as per Clause -5 (c) of the Scheme framed by the respondents for granting employment to the wards of those employees who have died in harness. Consequently, there is no error apparent on the face of record. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 29, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?