(^ IN THE HIC51 COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C-GARH Writ Petition No. S^20 /2001 Petitioner '&nt. Devanti Kashyap D/0 Late Ambika Soni aged about 30 yrs. Lower Divislon Clerk, Janpada Panchayat Ambikapur Distt. Surguja C-garb Vs. Resppndents R, W v,. ••ff &-."•" .^-'.-....••^-"l ...•5-:"""Kj.^y?-! "l.::;.^^^" (U/State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Panchayat Raipur (2) Janapada Panchayat Ambikapur through Chief Executive Officer Janapada panchayat Ambikapur Distt. Surguja C-garh (3) Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Surguja, Ambikapur (4)collector Surguja, Ambtkapur Distt. Surguja C-garh Petitlon under Article 226 and 227 of constitution of India for issuance of writ or Wrlts/Directlon or Directions order or erders. -HC..22 'v'7 an^rqff •ftTWSD^?! 'gniwflT^T w.f ^/1-^^^^°!7 ^i^4_^y 7:!fraraY^TO' ,f?aTTIy QyJ^t /^& -^ </<-^ ^ •T/V^vff^ !S!:..S.^^ ^ . Sina^ Bsnch .^i.A.^^te.i).^^^.......^.^.^...^^'^-t 2. crl'^ qiplfepfN •STTII^I'•?•fe'ztTfSre?R sii^iTOnw-gtg | "••-"^.3^3^ 13/12/2001 :- Heard Shri H.S. Tripath learned counsel for the petitione^ and Shri Rajiv Shrivastava, learne^ counsel for the 5tate/respondents| It is submitted b.y Shri Raji^ Shrivastava, learned counsel fo) the State/respondents that an^ action taken against the petitione^ is appealable under Appeal anql f Revision Rules of the M.P1 Panchoyat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993. 11 appears thdt the petitioner shoulc) approach the appropriat^ appellate/ reyisional outhority. It is further stated by the^ learned counsel for the petitioner^ that though the petitioner has been^ serving as Lower Division Clerk| since 1994 without <xny reasonable| ground the petitioner is sou9ht to be removed from service. t'1 ^qTS'tlft^ ^ 3-H<ii" 1^^ ( 3D^!I ^FRIIWHf^tf ^I^CI^I'I ifl^R^f ^f 'fe^ ^? srpgit sn^t "•.-^" According to the learned couns^l, the petitioner is <m eligible person to hold the post ^s she has also qualified in typing and also she passed (flass-X. It is further stated that she is still continuin^ till dote and she has not been removed yet. This considered by the appellate/ revi^ Until appropriate orders are pa^sed by the competent authority, the writ petitioner continue to work as Lower Divisioilial Clerk. The petition is disposed of. Certified copy of this order be su|)plie4^s per rules. ospect shall also be » ional authority. shall be allowed to Sd/- Chief Justfce BM A ^ L —FS/^-9 12001—l.oo.opo.