' . e. :. 42. * + j liN THE HIGH COUJRT OJF ])ELm AT NEW ])ELH:U: . W.P.(C) 126/2010 SANJA Y PRASHAR .· .... Petitioner Through Mr. Vishratn Mukerjee, Advocate. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .. Respondents Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Advocate for No. 1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V:U:JP:U:N SANGH:U: OR])ER :n.01.2010 Counsel for the petitioner, after some wishes to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to prefer ,such other remedy as may be available to the petitioner. In view of the nature of the disputes which involye disputed questions of fact, the writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to p:t;efer such other remedy as may be available to the petitioner. JANUA'i'!v U, 2010. VKR .;_-- VIJPIN SANGHI, J. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified