BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirteenth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12119 of 2011 M.ANAND ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARIMEDU POLICE STATION. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.GURUSEVE Advocate For Respondent : A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 392 of IPC in Crime No.616 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is arrayed as A2 and A1 was already arrested and enlarged on bail and the petitioner is nothing to do with the commission of offence and he apprehend for arrest and hence he come forward with this application and he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) submitted that A1 has snatched the chain and he was got red handedly and he was remanded to judicial custody and the case has been registered under Section 392 of IPC and A2 was assisting A1 for commission of offence and investigation is going on and he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submission made by both sides, it could be seen that the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 19.3.2011 and A1 was got red handedly and he was remanded to judicial custody and he was enlarged on bail and the part of A2 is he was assisting the commission of offence. Considering the fact that six months time has been over and even though the petitioner was not arrested he neither interfered with the investigation not absconded from the jurisdiction I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/A2 with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of Arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V. Madurai, and executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 am., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C Scrupulously. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which , anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 13/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V MADURAI 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI 3. THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARIMEDU POLICE STATION. MADURAI 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. R.GURUSEVE Advocate SR.No.31252 GH : 15.09.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12119 of 2011 Date :13/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/