IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7791 of 2010 DR.MRS.GOMATI VENKATRAMAN, wife of Sri C.R. Venkatraman, resident of 63, Srikunj Apartments, Buddha Colony, Patna, Patna- 800001. ---Petitioner Versus 1. PATNA UNIVERSITY, Patna through its Registrar. 2. The Vice-Chancellor, Patna University, Patna. 3. The Registrar, Patna University, Patna. 4. The Finance Officer, Patna University, Patna. 5. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Higher Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 4.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-University. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon her superannuation on 30th of June, 2001 from the post of University Professor in the Department of Chemistry, Magadh Mahila Collgege, Patna, retiral dues and some other dues have still remained to be settled and paid as indicated in her representation contained in Annexure 1. Learned counsel for the respondent-University submits that from the averments made in the writ application along with its annexures, it would appear that the claims are not specific and clear. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Registrar, Patna University, Patna (respondent no.3). In case such a representation is filed stating distinctly the details of her unpaid claims 2 as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in her representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in her representation may be settled at the earliest and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid. However, upon consideration, if any of the claims or part of the claims is found not admissible, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)