IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO : 5860 of 1995 Between: 1 Vanjari Pothana s/o shayanna,aged about 75 years,Occ:Agriculture,resident of Edgaon, Nirmal Mandal,Adilabad District. (Died) 2 Vanjari Chinnu Bai w/o late Pothanna 3 Shanker s/o Late Pothanna 4 Raju Gangaram s/o Late Pothanna 5 Someshwar s/o Late Pothanna 6 Laxmi w/o Rajanna & D/o Late V.Pothanna 7 Rama devi w/o Waddanna and d/o Late Pothanna. (Petitioners 2 to 7 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased sole petitioner as per Court Order dated 26.4.1999 in WPMP 4191/99) ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Government of of A.P rep., by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secratariat, Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner, (Survey & Land Records) Govt of A.P Hyderabad. 3 Collector, (Survey & Land Records) Adilabad District at Adilabad. 4 Assitant Director, Survey & Land Records Adilabad District at Adilabad. 5 Mandal Revenue Officer, Nirmal Revenue Mandal, Nirmal. 6 T.Vittal S/o Sayanna, aged about 56 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Edgaon, Nirmal Mandal, Adilabad District. 7 Laxmibai W/O T.Vittal, aged about 50 years, Occ: Agriculture, r/o Edgaon, Nirmal Mandal, Adilabad District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction preferable in the writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent in CSS & LR. Ref.No.P5/1045/94 dt.16-9- 1994 and the consequential orders of the 3rd and 4th respondents in Ref.No.A2/823/94 dt.26-12-1994 as illegal, void and without jurisdiction and violative of the principles of natural justice and direct the respondents 1 to5 herein to continue the existing entries in Setwal (Survey and Settlement Records) in respect of Old.Sy.No.1503 and New Sy.No.1644 without correcting the same in pursuance of the above orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.K.Govardhan Reddy, for MR.C.R.PRATAP REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: Mr K.Ramakrishna Reddy The Court made the following: ORDER: Mr. K.Govardhan Reddy, Advocate representing Mr.C.R.Pratap Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter is settled out of court and no further orders need be passed in this writ petition. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________ 18-11-2004 rkk To 1 Government of of A.P rep., by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secratariat, Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner, (Survey & Land Records) Govt of A.P Hyderabad. 3 Collector, (Survey & Land Records) Adilabad District at Adilabad. 4 Assitant Director, Survey & Land Records Adilabad District at Adilabad. 5 Mandal Revenue Officer, Nirmal Revenue Mandal, Nirmal. 6 Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 7 Two CD copies