FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITIONNO.241 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5668 OF 2006 (Jeevanlata w/o Laxman Parihar Vs. The State of Maharashtra & anr.) Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Shri P.P. Dama, Advocate holding for Shri H.I. Pathan, Advocate for petitioner Shri D.V. Tele, A.G.P. for respondent No.1. Shri S.N. Janakwade, Advocate holding for Shri P.R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for R.No.2. .... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATED : 13th June, 2011. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner makes a statement that he has instructions to withdraw this Contempt Petition. Contempt Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such. Notice stands discharged. Learned A.G.P. tenders reply across the bar and submits that the order of which contempt has been alleged, is complied with. In that view of the matter, Contempt Petition stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. ( S.S. SHINDE, J. ) fmp/cp241.06