?/' -HG—78 HTNCtF ^»*tT^» 7^r r^ii^Kn^^ ^tii<H^(o, [®icrii^^< ,.£:.^:.:..fn.:..^.o.:o.?..t^8 ^ 200 ^TT^T ^T'f^TNr TT^T ^TT^T 5b^i<^ ^ ^TRt?T XR^ (lic<f'l<t<<^) ^TTW ^rf^T ^TT^T <=hl^(<n<fll ^TR^Tf ^* 'fe1^ <FiJl^l< ^ 3tRTH 3TT^T DB: HON'BLE SHRI DHIREKlDSA BSISHRA AND HON»BLESHRI QILJP RA< DESHMUKH. JJ APPBLLANT NON- APPLICANT Versus Lakshmicl^and Kamde, aged 35 years, S/o Dev I<arai|i Kanide, R/o Kashsiram Nagar, Raipur, Tajhsil and Distt. Raipur (CO) RESPONDBNT APPLICANT Smt Yogelja Tai Kamde, W/o Lakshmichaad Kamdc, a^cd 32 ycars, R/o Smt. Vimla Tai Mesram's |house, present R/o Bhimnagar, Radha Kjrishna Ward, Gondia, Distt. Bhandara APPEAL UNDBR SECTION l|9 OF THE FAMULY COURTS ACT, 13-8-2008 ShriA.K. Bhardwaj, Ad^ Heard. The instant first appeal| 24& July, 2008 passed in M.| Fu-st Additional Principal 1984 ocate^ for the appellant. [is directed agalnst the order dated ^.C. No. 05/2007 whereby leamed |adge, Famity Court, Raipur has aUowed fhe application of fh^ .respondent under Order 9 Rule 13 of C.P.C. and set aside c|xparte judgment and decree dated 13-10-2006. 1 After hearing leamed cjounsel for fhe appeUant and afbea' going through the impi^ned t>rder, we are satisfied fhat the trial Court has allowed the appl^cation setting aside the judgment ^nd decree on fhe basis of e^ddence available on record, as the + Ril !'.^ ^— XI-HC—78 37Tit?T ^T f^TW <?8TT ^TT^T^FRT^ ^ k-' HW^l yhwe^ ^~^r ^ij^soi^, ^tit<ri^<o, [®«ni^^< -_.-<"...A-Jr)- ^^ 9H/^ ^ 200 3TT^T Tr^T (licl?vl<sl<^) '^TTW^f?^ 3^T^T respondent herein has beenj for her non-appearance on 3| were drawn against her. The|-e impugned order. The appeal being dev^id dismissed and the same is adcoi Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge <^i<»t<n<fli1RF^!if ^ ftT^ <n»i^i< ^3tfi!R3TT^T able to establish sufficiait cause 10-2006, when exparte proceeding is no illegality or infirmity ia tfae of substance, d^erves to be irdingly dismissed. Sd/- DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge