IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.28920 OF 2009 Between: The Toddy Tapers Cooperative Society, Sangareddy, Medak District ..... PETITIONER AND The Prohibition and Excise, Superintendent, Sangareddy, Medak District and another ....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.28920 OF 2009 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel. 2. The writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondent in issuing show-cause notice dated 10.12.2009 in Cr.No.B2/299/2009, for cancellation of the licences for Shop Nos.1 to 9 of TCS, Sangareddy, Sangareddy Mandal, Medak District, even before the receipt of the report from the Independent Lab as referred by the respondent as per the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.25588 of 2009, dated 25.11.2009, and even before conclusion of the proceeding against the Toddy Depot of the petitioner society as illegal, unlawful, contrary to law and against Section 31(2) of Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 and consequently to direct respondent No.1 to await his action against Shop Nos.1 to 9 of petitioner society till the receipt of the report from the Independent Lab and after completion of the proceeding against the Toddy Depot and pass such other suitable orders. 3. Sri P. Bala Mukunda Rao, representing respondent No.2, who had been impleaded, would maintain that it is only a show-cause notice and by suppression of facts the interim order had been obtained. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise would submit that some writ petitions, where similar directions had been granted, had been disposed of. 5. In the light of the interim directions already granted, this Court ordered notice before admission on 31.12.2009 and granted interim direction as hereunder: “Till the report from the second analyst is received, no final orders shall be passed.” 6. In the light of the interim direction issued by this Court on 31.12.2009, no further direction need to be issued. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of in the light of the direction aforesaid. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ P.S. NARAYANA, J February 02, 2010 MD