IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.47207 OF 2008 1. RAN VIJAY SINGH @ JULENDRA SINGH, SON OF LATE JHULAN SINGH 2. LALAN SINGH, SON OF LATE JHULAN SINGH 3. DURG VIJAY SINGH @ NEPALI SINGH, SON OF LATE JHULAN SINGH 4. MUKESH SINGH, SON OF RAN VIJAY SINGH 5. SHAMBHU SINGH, SONOF RAN VIJAY SINGH 6. VIJAY SINGH, SON OF LALAN SINGH 7. SUBHASH SINGH, SON OF LATE BABAN SINGH 8. SANJAY SINGH, SON OF LATE BABAN SINGH ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE AND POST OFFICE BERATH, POLICE STATION CHOURI (SAHAR), DISTRICT BHOJPUR ……………………………………………………………………………..PETITIONERS VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ********** 2 06/11/2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners have filed this application challenging the order dated 18.08.2008 by which the Court below has rejected the application for discharge. The main ground for challenging the order is that accordingly to the Counsel for the petitioners, no offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code is made out against the petitioners. He further submits that although there is allegation that the petitioners were carrying fire arms, the fire arms were not used on the informant or other persons rather injuries were found to be inflicted by a hard blunt substance. It is submitted that there was no intention as required under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code to kill the informant or others and as such the offences under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code 2 is not made out against the petitioners. The question whether any offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code is made out against the petitioners or not, can well be argued and demonstrated once evidence is led in this case. As such, I find no anomaly in the impugned order. This application is accordingly dismissed. ANAND ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )