S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5928/2007. Rameshar Lal Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 19th September 2007. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. I.R. Choudhary, for the petitioner. … By way of this writ petition, the petitioner, a Senior Teacher working with the Education Department, seeks to question the order dated 31.07.2007 (Annex.1) whereby he has been transferred from Government Secondary School No.2 Kuchaman City, Nagaur to Government Secondary School, Gangwa, Nagaur essentially on the submissions that the petitioner has been transferred though the persons with longer stay at the Station have been retained; and that the transfer order suffers from mala fide inasmuch as there has been enmity between the members of Vikas Samiti, Kuchaman City on one hand and the staff of the school on the other, in relation to some land donated to the school by the then President of Vikas Samiti and for a litigation concerning a part of school building; and, according to the petitioner, for such dispute the petitioner has been got transferred mala fide with the help of local M.L.A. 1 Having examined the matter in its totality, this Court is constraint to observe that the petitioner seeks to question his transfer order by way of this writ petition though there remains available specific alternative remedy of assailing the impugned transfer order by way of appeal before the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal; and there is no special reason or circumstance for which the petitioner may be permitted to by- pass such statutory remedy and to directly maintain a writ petition. The grounds sought to be urged by the petitioner do not make out any such case that the writ petition be entertained while ignoring the alternative remedy. Though the petitioner has alleged to have made a representation dated 06.08.2007 (Annex.2) for cancellation of his transfer order and there is not even a whisper in the said representation about the allegations of mala fide as made in this writ petition but this Court would not pronounce upon the merits of the grounds sought to be urged by the petitioner for being not inclined to entertain the matter in its extraordinary writ jurisdiction because of availability of alternative remedy. Exercise of writ jurisdiction in this matter is refused; and the petition is rejected. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. Mohan/ 2