IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.16290 of 2011 Date of Decision : September 02, 2011. Leela Rani .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Rajesh K.Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Let two copies of the writ petition be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of day failing which the order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution. The petitioner is a Principal in Government Senior Secondary School, Sekhewal, Ludhiana. She has been transferred from Government Senior Secondary School, Sekhewal, Ludhiana to Government Girls Senior CWP No.16290 of 2011 [2] Secondary School, Katani Kalan, Ludhiana vide the impugned order dated 25.8.2011 (Annexure P-10). The petitioner's case is that respondent No.5 to 8 who are the President/Councilors/Chairmen of the PTA etc. and are responsible for the unauthorized construction/occupation of the shops on the Schools land, have got her transferred. The petitioner is said to have made complaints to the authorities including vide memo dated 3.5.2010 (Annexure P-4) against these private respondents. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I am of the considered opinion that when apparently there is groupism in the school, the transfer per se would be in the administrative interest of the students and the Teachers both, calling for no interference by this Court. It, however does not mean that the complaints made by the petitioner would be put under the carpet. The writ petition is disposed of without interfering with the transfer of the petitioner, however, with a direction to the Director, Public Instructions (Schools), Punjab, to refer the complaints made by the petitioner to the State Vigilance Bureau and get a fact finding enquiry conducted within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. In case it is found that the private respondents and their henchmen have usurped the Government School's property, the Vigilance Bureau shall proceed against the suspects in accordance with law. A compliance report be submitted to this Court. CWP No.16290 of 2011 [3] Let a copy of this order be given to Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for information and necessary compliance. Dasti. September 02, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE