HISH CWRT <T CHHATHSSARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S1 No. 2652 of 2007 Versus Hakeem Ulla Khan, son of Rdimat Ulla Khan, cged about 39 years, Assi. Teacher, ©overnmentPrimary School Sinwar, Vikas Uiand Dharamjciigarh, District Rdgarh {c.e.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secrstory, Oepart'ment of Triboi Welfare, txu Kalyai Singh Bhawim, Raipw (C.ff.) 2. The District Educotion Offieer, bistt. Rdgarh (C.©.) Writ Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of India SB-. Hon'ble Shri Justice Satish K. ^nihotri. Present: Mr. A.N. Bhakta, Advocate for the petitioner. ttr. Arvind Ditoey, Panel Lawyer for State/respondents. OR&ER (Possed on this 3rd bay of May. 2007) 1. The question of !aw involved herein is osto whether the petitioner is entitled to reguta* payf scale w.e.f. the dote of initial appointment or from the dafe of completion of probafion period. 2. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law invoived in the prssent writ petition are the same as to that of in W. P. (S) No. 5473/2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sharma & emother vs. Stats of hhattisgorh & others), which wcs disposed of vide order dated 9.10.2006. 3. In view of the above-stoted submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms. No order as to cssts. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge