[1] DBCWP 2146/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2146/2010 KAMLESH SHARMA Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR & ANR. Date: 17.02.2010. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. S.P. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. **** The instant writ petition is directed against the order dated 04.12.2009(Annexure-5), by which the Registrar (Admn.), Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur in continuation to the office order dated 04.05.2009, extended the term period of promotion of the Assistant Registrar (Protocol) namely; Shri Ugam Raj and Shri Mukesh Prasad Sharma posted at Rajasthan High Court Jodhpur/Jaipur Bench, Jaipur for further six months. Learned counsel for the petitioner referred the order dated 18.11.2009 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14300/2009- Kamlesh Sharma Vs. High Court of Judicature for Rajasathan at Jaipur and others, filed by the same petitioner, challenging the promotion of Shri Mukesh Prasad Sharma, Court Master and Shri Ugam Raj, Senior Judicial Assistant. [2] DBCWP 2146/2010 Upon perusal of the order dated 18.11.2009 passed by the Division Bench in the aforesaid writ petition, it appears that after hearing learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, the writ petition so far as Shri Mukesh Prasad Sharma is concerned, has been dismissed observing as under:- “ So far as Shri Mukesh Prasad Sharma is concerned, he is in the feeding channel for promotion. His promotion is only ad hoc and temporary and not on substantive basis. Such an arrangement in the administrative exigencies can be made by the competent authority in the interest of the administration. Therefore, no case against him, for the time being, is made out and the writ petition to that extent is dismissed.” As regards Shri Ugam Raj, notices were issued to the respondents and were made returnable within four weeks. It is not disputed that the aforesaid writ petition i.e. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14300/2009 is still pending. The petitioner has got no fresh cause of action only because the term period of adhoc/temporary promotion has been extended vide order dated 04.12.2009. It is the total discretion of the High Court administration to make such arrangement looking to the exigency of services. Further, the extension order dated 04.12.2009 does not change the nature of the original order dated 04.05.2009. [3] DBCWP 2146/2010 Thus, in our considered view, since D.B. Civil Writ No. 14300/2009, filed by the same petitioner, is still pending consideration before this Court, the present writ petition is not maintainable and the petitioner can raise all just and legal objections in the aforesaid writ petition which is still pending. Consequently, the present writ petition fails being devoid of merit and the same is hereby dismissed in limine without issuing notices to the respondents. (MAHESH BHAGWATI),J. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/