IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2744 of 2007 BETWEEN Eluturi Ramdas. ... PETITIONER AND Chalagundal Vijay Kumar and another. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. CH. JANARDHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: --NONE APPEARED-- The Court made the following: ORDER: Petitioner is judgment debtor, who approached this Court against the warrant of attachment of his salary ordered by the executing Court in EP.No.360 of 2006 in O.S.No.1709 of 2005 dated 13.04.2007. 2. On 31.10.2007 this Court while admitting the revision petition passed the following interim order: “There shall be interim stay of all further proceedings in E.P.No.360 of 2006 in O.S.No.1709 of 2005 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, on the condition of the petitioner depositing to the credit of said E.P. a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) within a period of two weeks and thereafter Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand only) per month commencing from 5th December 2007 and on or before 5th of every month. If the petitioner commits default in complying with this order, the stay order without any further reference to this Court shall stand vacated.” 3. On the last occasion, when the matter was listed, the learned counsel for the petitioner was required to get instructions as to the compliance of the interim order and also as to whether the entire EP amount has been paid or not. 4. Today, the learned counsel for the petitioner is present and submits that he has not been able to get the correct information from the counsel on record in the lower Court. However, the interim order of this Court, as above, not only covers the initial deposit of Rs.10,000/- but also directs every month deposit at Rs.2,000/- commencing from December 2007. Since, four years have gone by, the entire amount must have been recovered by now and that is the reason, perhaps, nobody appears for the decree holder in spite of service. The civil revision petition is, therefore, disposed of subject to the condition of the petitioner complying with the order aforesaid till recovery of entire EP amount. The impugned order of attachment, which has been under interim stay of this Court from 31.10.2007, shall not be given effect to till the petitioner continues to comply with order aforesaid. In default, the first respondent/decree holder is free to bring the said default to the notice of the executing Court and thereafter, the executing Court shall be free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J March 3, 2011 DSK