HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (22T1 No. 6S43 of 2011 PETITIONER/ PlaiQSitr RB8POND55NTS/ Defeada&ts VERSUS 1. 2. Rainsahay Awasfhi S/o Late Paiinalal Awasthi, aged about 63 years, R/o M.I.G. Flat No. 11, Near Chetak Bridge, Beside Jeevaa Anaad, Goutam Nagar, Bhopal (M.P.). Snit Shyama LeeUiare W/o Nirbhay, aged about 51 years, R/o M.I.G. -11, Mukutnagar, Titurdih, Durg, Tatisil & District Durg (C.G.), State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough the CoUector, Durg (C.G.). IT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THB CONSTITUTION OP IND!A. (SB :Hoa?ble Mr. T.P.Shairma, J.) Present:- Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Ad\?ocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, P.L. for the State/respondent No. 2. Respondent No. 1 not noticed* ^ OKDER (Passedoa 08/11/2011) By this petition under Article 227 of fhe Constitution of India petitioner has chaUenged fhe legalily aad propnety of fhe order dated 2/8/2011 passed by 4th Additional Distdct Judge, Durg m Miscellaiieous Civil Appeal No. 02/2011 whercby order dated 29/ 10/2010 passed by 8th CivU Judge Class-2, Durg (C.G.) in civU suit No. 117A/10 disiaissing ttie application for gi^nt of temporary nijunction has been af&mied, Mr. Gontam Khetrapal, Advocate for fhe petitioner and Ms, Sangeeta Mishra, P.L. for the State/respondent No, 2 are heard. On perasal of both the orders & copy of the docuinents, I do not fiiid aay iUegality in^ fhe orders impugned requiring aay interierence in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction in tenais of Under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Consequently, petition is Uable to be disraissed arid is hereby disxaissed at fhe stage of adiaissioa itsetf. However, considerbig fhe dispute Court below shaU decide fhe suit as early as possible, No order as to coste, Intermi appMcation staads disposed of. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge