\^\^ ^•®f ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPTTR PETITIONER RESK»NDE.NTS WritFetition(S)Np,u8S4Qf2007 Ranvir Meshram S/o Chandra Bhan Mesfarain, aged about 62 years, R/'o Near Shiv Mandir 2 Lane Raja Talab, Raipur VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Piiblic Works Departinent Through its Principal Secretary, DK8 Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. Execiitive Enginner (I) PWD. Raipur Distt. Raipur (CG). 3. Sub Divisional OfHcer Sub Division No. II PWD Distriet Raipur(CG). (WMT PETmON UNDER ARTtCLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUnON OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'Ue Mr. Satish K. Agmhotri, J.) Present : Sliri Anil Sin^i Rajput, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.S. KacKhwaha, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORALORBER (Fassed on 18t" ofMardi, 2008) 1. With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up for hearing fmally. 2. Shri Anil Singh Rajput, leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the facts involved in tliis petition is identical to that of in the matter of W.P. No. 4135/04 (M.A. Hakim Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others), wherein, this Coiut has passed the order on 28.08.2006 allowiiig the petition. It is next contended that the State Govt. has approached the Supreme Court against the said order dated 28.08.06 and the same was dismissed on 08.12.2006. 3. Lesased counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty ofthis Court to make a detailed representation for con_sideration ofhis case in the U^it ofjudgnient and order dated 28.08.06 passed in W.P. No. 4135/04 (M.A. Hal.ain Vs. State ofMadhya Pradesh and others) (Supra). 4. Shri A.S. KaclAwaha, Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the State submits that, in the event, the petitioner make a representatioii, the sanie shall be considered in accordanee with law expeditiously. 5. !n view ofthe foregoing, the writ petition stands disposed of with the above stated liberty. No order asto cost. __, Satish K. Agnihotri Judge