ss^, HIGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITiON (Cl N0.3286 QF: PETiTIONEro DEFENDANT N0.1 .RESTONDENTS/ PLAINTIFF' DEFENDANT N0.2 Gajanand Sahu, son of Shri Samaroo Sahu, aged about 45 years, Resident of Bagdehi^ara, Navapara, District Raipur (CG). versus 1. Santosh Kumar Sahu, son of Late PraSap Sahu, aged about 40 years. 2. Dayawati Sahu, widow of Late Pratap Sahu, aged about 60 years. 3. Motin Bai, wife of Shri Madhusudan Sahu, aged about 3S years. 4. LaSa Bai Sahu, wife of Shri Leslaram Sahu, aged about 36 years. 5. Geeta Bai, wife of Shri Pawan Sahu, aged about 32 years. 6. Mohan Bai, wife of Shri Kamlesh Sahu, aged about 32 years. Ali are residente of Bagdehipara, Navapara, Tahsil Abhanpur, District Raipur (CG). 7. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector, Raipur (CG). (Writ petition under Articte 227 ofthe Constitution oflndia) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Mr.P.P.Sahu, counseiforthepetitioner. Mr. Raja Sharma, counsel for the respondent No.1. Mr. Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ALOI ER (Passed on this 4"' February, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for fte petitioner submits that the petitioner has fited certified copy of the plaint, judgment and order passed in civil suit No.83-A/1992 (Pratep Sahu vs. Dayaram Sahu). As per the provisions of Order XIII Rule 10 (2) ofthe Code of Civit Procsdure, 1908 application was made for requisitioning the records of the earlier suit, which was decided and judgmentwas passed. € ^- Gowri 2) Admittedly, the petitioner has filed certified copies of all the documente. From the certified copies if the contents are not admissible and the same creates doubt, the Court can requisite the records of other suit, if so required. 3) In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of. 4) Consequently, interim orderpassed earlier stands discharged and the application I.A.No.1 stands disposed of. —-— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge l'