IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 18TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 29TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 5287 of 2011(I) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- O.R.MURALI, UD CLERK,BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICE,MALAMPUZHA,,MARUTHARODE.P.O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ASSISTANT DEVELOPEMTN COMMISSIONER (GENERAL),PALAKKAD. 3. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICE,MALAMPUZHA. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 5287 of 2011 I ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 18th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner prays for a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 representation stated to have been submitted through proper channel on 05-02-2011. 2. The petitioner entered in service as Lower Division Clerk and as per Ext.P1 order dated 06-05-2005, his probation was declared with effect from 18-06-1997 AN. It was submitted that there are mistakes in the entries in the service book of the incumbent. 3. It is evident from Ext.P2 that when the date was entered in the service book, the same was wrongly entered as 01-07-1999. It is the case of the petitioner that when he came to know about the mistake, he had filed a representation before the 1st respondent which is not traceable now. 4. Presently he has filed a representation as per W.P.(C) No.5287/2011 : 2 : Ext.P3 and it is pointed out that unless the said entry is corrected, it will delay the rightful promotion. 5. Therefore, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider the representation filed as per Ext.P3 and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, after perusing the relevant files within a period of one month. The petitioner will be offered a hearing also. Petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge