IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4831 of 1998 1. Birendra Prasad Singh son of Sri Bhola Pd. Singh 2. Bijor Kumar Singh son of Sri Budh Narayan Singh 3. Awadhesh Pd. Singh son of Sri Jagdish Singh 4. Birendra Kumar Singh son of Sri Ram Tapeshwar Singh 5. Bipin Bihari Singh son of Late Nathuni Singh 6. Chandeshwar Dubey son of Sri Kanhaiya Dubey 7. Dineshwar Diwvedi son of Sri Shivshambhu Dube 8. Dinanath Sah son of Sri Ganga Pd. Sah 9. Satyendra Kumar Singh son of Sri Balrati Raman Singh 10. Dinanath Singh son of sri Shivanandan Singh 11. Ram Ashish Pd. Son of Ramjanam Prasad 12. Birendra Singh son of Mundrika Singh 13. Hridayanand Singh son of Indradeo Singh 14. Mahendra Pratap Singh son of Sri Indrajeet Singh 15. Awadh Bihari Singh son of Sri Sukhdeo Singh 16. Lalan Prasad son of late Sri Ram Krishna Srivastav 17. Ram Pravesh Singh son of sri Ganga Pd. Singh 18. Amulya Kumar Tiwary son of Sri Markanday Tiwari 19. Udaya Shankar Pd. Yadav sonof Sri Parmeshwar Pd. Yadav 20. Rajesh Kumar son of Sri Ram Adhar Singh 21. Bharat Singh son of Sri Gaya Pd. Chaudhary 22. Ram Niwas Pandey son of Sri Mukhdeo Pandey 23. Niranjan Kumar Singh son of Sri L P Singh 24. Satyendra Singh son of Sri Ram Nathun Singh 25. Sudhir Pal son of Sri Ghurai Pal 26. Ashok Hari son of Sri Ganga Prasad 27. Alkha Nand Choube son of Sri Bechan Choube 28. Dilip Kumar Tiwari son of sri Radeh Shyam Tiwari 29. Upendra Singh son of late Ramadhar Singh 30. Jagannath Pd. Son of Sri Shivapujan Prasad 31. Arun Kumar Mandal son of Sri Sridhar Mandal 32. Z. Haidar son of Kalamuddin Ansari -All petitioner no.1 to 32 posted on the basis of B.Sc. degree as Technician, Grade-II in Pyrites Phosphates and Chemical Ltd. (PPCL) Amjhore, PO Amjhore, District Rohtas …… Petitioners Versus 1. Pyrites Phosphates & Chemicals Ltd. Through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, 12 A Sector 24, Noida, District Gaziabad (U.P.), a Govt. of India Undertaking 201301 2. The Executive Director, Pirites Phosphates and Chemicals Ltd., Amjhore, District Rohtas (Bihar) 3. The Senior Manager Personal and Administration, Amjhore, District Rohtas (Bihar) 4. The Union of India through O.P.No.1 …Opp.Parties - Respondents 2 06- 14/12/2011 None appear for the parties when the case is called out. The writ petition has been filed against the order dated 29.9.97 passed by the Manager, Administration of respondent no.1, by which it has been reiterated that the claim for equal pay and status to the petitioners as given to the diploma-holder candidates has been rejected. From the pleadings it appears that the petitioners are claiming parity of the pay scale available to the employees of other Government of India Undertakings. This Court is of the opinion that since the entities are distinct and separate, it is well within their domain to decide with regard to the pay scale which shall be paid to their employees/officers. The same cannot be directed to be paid by this Court. Further, at the time of joining the organization, the petitioners were fully aware of the pay scale which they shall be getting. Thus, subsequently they cannot raise a claim for pay parity specially when they are the employees of another distinct organization. 2. In view of the aforesaid, this Court feels that the writ petition is misconceived. The writ petitioners may be well advised to take up the matter with the concerned authorities. There is no occasion for this Court to intervene in this matter. 3. For the reasons aforesaid, the writ petition stands dismissed. mrl ( Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)