O.J.C. No.970 of 2002 09. 30.08.2016 Office note indicates that although the petitioner had not filed requisites for issuance of notice to the opposite parties pursuant to direction of this Court dated 11.04.2008, opposite party has entered appearance through counsel Ms. Bharati Das. Hence, the said noting stands deleted from the cause list. Mr. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner is present. None appears for opposite party Nos.1 to 4 (Railways). It is stated that Mr. Dhanoj Kumar Sahu, learned counsel is the presen t Standing Counsel for the Railways. Accordingly, the name of Mr. Sahu be indicated in the cause list as we ll as in the cause title as the counsel for the Railways and the petitioner shall also serve a n extra copy of the writ application along with Annexures on him by 01.09.2016. List this matter on 14.09.2016 in order to enable the learned counsel for the Railways to obtain instruction in the matter. .. I. Mahanty , J. ....... Biswajit M ohanty, J. 2