1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2179 OF 2005 Shri Dilip Dattaram Agre Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2313 OF 2005 Shri Sudhakar Tukarm Satam Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. Respondents Mr.Prakash Naik for petitioner in W.P.2179/05. Mr.S.V.Kotwal for petitioner in W.P.2313/05. Ms.A.S.Pai, APP for State in both the matters. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & SMT.R.S.DALVI,JJ. February 02, 2006. P.C. . The PSI from Worli Police Station is present in the Court and on instructions Mrs.Pai, the learned APP states that all investigations into C.R.Nos.280/05 (filed by Shri Sudhakar Satam), C.R. No.281/05 (filed by Dilip Agre) and C.R.No.283/05 (filed by Mrs.Agre) have been completed and the 2 charge-sheets have been filed before the competent Court on 17th January 2006 and/or 31st January 2006. This position is not disputed. . Mr.Naik, the learned counsel in the first petition raised the issue of return of property and on instructions Ms.Pai states that an application in that regard would be submitted before the Court below by the officer concerned at the earliest possible and such an application will have to be heard and decided as per law after hearing the parties concerned. . Mr.Kotwal, the learned counsel in the second petition has invited our attention to the complaint dated 24-1-2005 submitted to the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-III, Mumbai and submitted that complaints on the same lines were also submitted to the higher-ups and nothing has been done by the concerned police station into the said complaints. We direct the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-III to take appropriate steps to ensure that the complaint dated 24-1-2005 is registered and subjected to investigations as per law as early as possible. 3 . Save and except the above directions, the petitions are disposed off. (SMT.R.S.DALVI,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)