WP(C) 3368/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. A.K. Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. H. Rahman, learned Government Advocate representing the respondents. 2. The petitioner who was engaged temporarily as a Cook on 11.8.2009 under the State Fire Service Organization, Assam has approached this Court to challeng e the order dated 23.2.2010 (Annexure-V), whereby he has been discharged from se rvice on the ground of unsuitability. 3. The discharge order is challenged by the petitioner on the ground that, at Shilchar where the petitioner was initially posted, the petitioner was subjec ted to ill treatment by his superior officer and in pursuant to various incident s at Silchar, the petitioner had lodged complaint against the Sr. Station Office r, Silchar Fire Station. Thereafter the matter was enquired into and a police co mplaint was also filed (subsequently withdrawn) by the petitioner. 4. Thereafter the Sr. Station Officer at Silchar was severely censured fo r abusing his subordinate and the petitioner was warned to be regular in his d uty and also to pick up proper skills for the work for which he was appointed. 5. The petitioner was then transferred to the Nagaon Fire Station and it wa s specifically recorded in the order dated 23.12.2009 that his performance will be watched by the Station Officer, Nagaon Fire Station. 6. The main contention of the petitioner is that the discharge order has be en passed against him because of the instigation of the Sr. Station Officer at S ilchar and it has noting to do with assessment of his skills and service at Naga on. 7. In the affidavit filed by the Director of State Fire Service Organizatio n, Assam, it is averred that the petitioner was not sincere in performing his du ty at Nagaon as he was not interested to serve as a Cook and he had misbehaved w ith other employees of the Nagaon Fire Station. A written complaint given by 6 f ire service personnel posted at Nagaon Fire Station was also referred to in the affidavit to show that the petitioner was grossly negligent of his duty and was not willing to serve as a Cook. He was also reported to have misbehaved with oth er employees at Nagaon Fire Service Station. Accordingly having found him unsuit able for the job, he was discharged from service. 8. Since the petitioner alleges that the service rendered by the petitioner at Nagaon was satisfactory and the same could not have been the basis for his d ischarge, this Court perused the written complaint(s) of the 6 fire service pers onnel of Nagaon. A perusal of the 2 written complaints in vernacular shows the a ttitude of the petitioner towards his job and his unsuitability for continuing a s a Cook. Since the complaints pertain to the petitioner’s stint at Nagaon and h as no relation to the incidents at Silchar, it is difficult to accept the conten tion made by the petitioner that his service at Nagaon was not the basis for his discharge but it was instigated by his former boss at Silchar. 9. Therefore I am of the considered opinion that there was reasonable basis for passing the impugned discharge order on the ground of petitioner’s unsuitab ility and the said order does not warrant any interference of the Court. 10. In view of above, this case is found to be without any merit and the sam e is accordingly dismissed.