IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25386 of 2003 Between: Ch. Rajendra Prasad, S/o. Pattabi, practicing as an Advocate in Gudiwada Courts, Krishna Dist. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of A.P. rep by its Secretary, Law Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad. 2 The Dist. Collector, Krishna Dist. 3 N.V.D. Badrinath, Advocate, Gudiwada, Krishna Dist. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action 1st respondent in issuing the G.O.Rt.No.2155 Law Department dt.27-11-2003, appointing the respondent No.3 as Asst. Government Pleader in Senior Civil Judge's Courts, Gudivada, Krishna Dist. is contrary to the G.O.Ms.No.187 dt. 6-12-2000 (Andhra Pradesh Law Officers, Appointment and Conditions of Services) illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent no.1 and 2 to consider the name of the petitioner for the appointment of Asst. Govt. Pleader in Senior Civil Judge's Courts, Gudivada, Krishna Dist. Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. K.V. Subba Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: G.P., Law & Legislative Affairs Counsel for respondent No.2: G.P., Revenue Counsel for respondent No.3: Mr. V. Brahmaiah Chowdary The Court made the following Order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. June 4, 2009 MRR ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{ }