THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA C.M.A.No.1439 of 1996 ORAL JUDGMENT: Heard both sides. 2. Aggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded by the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation-cum-Assistant Commissioner of Labour, II Circle, Rangareddy District (for brevity “the Tribunal”), in W.C.No.126 of 1995, for the death of one Abdul Samad alias Md. Babu, the son of applicants therein, the appellant-New India Assurance Company Limited has preferred the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. 3. Before the Tribunal, the applicant No.1 examined himself as P.W.1 and got marked Exs.A-1 to A-7 on their behalf. Except filing copy of insurance policy, under Ex.B-1, none were examined on behalf of the appellant-insurance company. 4. I have carefully perused the impugned award, passed by the Tribunal, wherein it was held that the deceased was a workman under the Workmen’s Compensation Act and he died during the course of his employment as a Cleaner and accordingly, awarded a sum of Rs.90,568/- towards compensation. 5. Even the appellant-insurance company failed to examine any of its officers to prove its contentions. Further, the Tribunal has elaborately dealt with all the aspects and awarded compensation. 6. For the foregoing, I see no illegality or irregularity in the impugned order, passed by the Tribunal, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal fails and is liable to be dismissed. 7. In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. --------------------------------- JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 22nd JULY 2010 dr