). ^ < HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR PETITIONER/: (Applicant) RESPONDENTS: Writ Petition (C) No.7507 of 2007 Tamansingh Sonwani, Son of Late Kalyan Singh Sonwani, aged about 46 years, FVo Sarbada, Tahsil Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chairman Board of Revenue, Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, Circuit Court Raipur (C.G.) 3. Additional Collector, District Dhamtari 4. Sub Divisional Officer, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) 5. Gram Panchayat Sarbada, Tahsil Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) {Writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India} Present: 4. Mr. Raghavendra Pradhan, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Akhil Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents No.1, 3 & None present for respondent No.2. Ms. Morisha Chattri, counsel for respondent No.5. Sinflle Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma. J ORAL ORDER (17-8-2011) 1. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged legality and prcpriety of the order dated 9-3- 2007 passed by the Board of Revenue, Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur (Circuit Court, Raipur) in Revision Case No.RN/04/RA-71/973/2006, affirming the order dated 19-6-2006 passed by the Additional Collector, Dhamtari in Revision Case No.15/A-71/05-06, affirming the order dated 15-11-1960 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Dhamtari in Revenue Case No.3-A/ 71/60-61. —SB—«~ ^' ^.. ^' ^ Soma 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach appellate forum against the order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer in the light of Section 44 of the Chhattisgarh land Revenue Code, 1959 (for short 'the Code'). Learned counsel submits that the revision filed on behalf of the petitioner herein was not maintainable in accordance with Section 50 (1) (i) (a) of the Code. 3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. No order as to costs. Sd/- T. P. Sharma Judge ||^|^^F^®sSI^^^S^^^?s^^^^