1 24 ss.1420.10 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1420 OF 2010 Rakesh Aggarwal. ... Plaintiff Versus Uvaiz Exports. ... Defendant ----- Mr. Yashpal M. Jain for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. ----- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 14 th January, 2011. JUDGMENT: 1 The suit is shown under caption “for ex-parte decree”. The office noting shows that writ of summons has been served to the Defendant, but the Defendant has not entered appearance within the period stipulated by law. The suit is for recovery of price of goods sold and delivered. Reliance is placed on invoices served by the Plaintiff upon the Defendant. Details of the part payment made by the Defendant have been set out. The original documents have been placed on record. 2 In view of sub-Rule 3 of Rule 2 of Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the Plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed. 2 24 ss.1420.10 3 Accordingly, suit stands decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). 4 The Plaintiff will be entitled to refund of Court-fees as per the rules. [ A.S.OKA, J ]