IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.16966 of 2005 Between: Syed Hameeduddin, S/o. Syed Basheeruddin, R/o. H.No.5-5-177/A, First Floor, Ghousepura Daussalam, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The General Manager A.P. Transco, Somajiguda Hyderabad. 2 The Divisional Engieer Electrical Department, Begum Bazar Hyderabad. 3 The Assistawnt Executive Engineer (OP), South Circle Seethrambagh, Hyderabad. 4 The Assistant Executive Engineer Seetharambagh Division Darussalam Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.1 to 4 is illegal in disconnecting the Electricity Supply in the premises bearing No.5-5-177/A, First Floor, situated at Ghousepura, Darussalam, Hyderabad and consequently, an interim direction be passed directing the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 to restore the electricity supply forthwith in the premises bearing No.5-5-177/A, first floor. Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Mohd. Qasim Counsel for the respondents: Mr. O. Manohar Reddy (SC FOR APTRANSCO) The Court made the following: Order: In this writ petition, the petitioner has questioned the action of the respondents in disconnecting electric power supply in premises bearing No.5-5-177/A, situated at Ghousepura, Darussalam, Hyderabad, In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, it is stated that in the aforesaid premises there are two other service connections for which consumption charges have not been paid; as such the service connection of the petitioner, which is also situated in the same premises, has been disconnected as link service. When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents that during the pendency of the writ petition, arrears, which were due from time to time, were paid and electric power supply is being continued to the petitioner. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of placing on record the aforesaid submission of the learned Standing Counsel. However, it is made clear that if there are any subsequent dues from the petitioner, it is open to the respondents to issue notice of demand and proceed in accordance with the terms and conditions of supply. _______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. June 29, 2009 MRR ... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP {CHP}