1 c.a.2311.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2311 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 29317 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.N.S.Patil,Advocate holding for Shri.S.M.Godsay,Advocate for Applicant. .... CORAM: K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 09th DECEMBER,2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Though, respondents are served no one appeared, when matter was called out. 2. Present Civil Application is preferred by the applicant for condonation of 81 days delay in filing the Appeal against the Judgment and Award dated 25th June, 2009 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Sangamner in M.A.C.P. No. 272 of 2002. 2 c.a.2311.10 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders 3. Mr. Patil, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that, because of financial crises, the applicant could not contact his Advocate at Sangamner for filing the appeal in time. He further submits that they have good chances of succuss in the present appeal. 4. Considering the reasons given in para Nos.4 and 5 of the Civil application and submissions advanced, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause [B], which reads as under: “[B] The delay of 81 days in filing the appeal may kindly be condoned and the appeal may be ordered to be registered.” Sd/- [K.K. TATED, J.] MTK 3 c.a.2311.10