( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3414 OF 2010 1. Dattarao s/o Dnyanoba Ghumre (Application of this applicant has been already dismissed by Court's order dated 30-08-2010) 2. Bhagwan s/o Uttam Ghumre 3. Balu s/o Bhagwan Ghumre 4. Rama s/o Bhagwan Ghumre All r/o Waghala, Tq. Pathri, District Parbhani. APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & another RESPONDENTS .... Mr. S.J. Salunke, advocate for the applicants. Mr. B.J. Sonawane, APP for the respondents/State. .... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 12th October, 2010] PER COURT : 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail. 2. The request for discretionary relief was rejected in respect of original applicant No. 1 i.e. Dattarao. The other three (3) applicants were granted ad-interim relief. 3. Having heard learned advocate for the applicants and ( 2 ) learned A.P.P for the State and on perusal of the investigation papers, it appears that informant received three (3) injuries, one CLW on the scalp, one contusion on right thigh and one contusion on right chest. All the three (3) injuries were of simple nature. The size of the injuries is also not of higher degree. The applicants No. 2 to 4 did not use any weapon at the relevant time. The incident occurred at spur of moment and as a result of family feud. There is no substantial reason to hold that arrest of the present applicants No. 2 to 4 is essential for the purpose of effective investigation. Under the circumstances, their application is allowed in terms of the order dated 30th August, 2010. The anticipatory bail will be continued only till filing of the final report/chargesheet and that the applicants No. 2 to 4 shall attend the concerned Police Station on each Sunday between 10.00 a.m. and 2 p.m. for three (3) consecutive Sundays. They shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer and shall effectively participate in the course of investigation. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/criapln3414-10 ( 3 )