THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.23646 of 2008 DATED: 18.06.2010 Between: N. Badaharan Reddy .. Petitioner And The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad and others. .. Respondents ORDER: The petitioner states that he lodged complaints with the respondents 1 and 2, on 23.10.2008 and 25.10.2008, complaining that the 3rd respondent is making additions to his building, situated adjacent to the petitioner’s house, without maintaining proper set- backs, but however, no action is initiated by them till date. Hence, he filed the present writ petition seeking appropriate directions. On 31.10.2008, this Court, while issuing notice before admission, directed the 2nd respondent- Deputy Commissioner, Alwal Zone, GHMC Alwal, to depute one of his responsible officers to the premises of the 3rd respondent wherein the constructions are in progress and verify whether the constructions are in accordance with the sanctioned plan and submit report to this Court. Accordingly, the 2nd respondent submitted his report dated 16.01.2010, a perusal of which indicates that there are certain deviations in the constructions made by the 3rd respondent and that the Corporation would initiate necessary action as per the provisions of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955, and G.O.Ms.No.86 MA dated 03.03.2006. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and the learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the report of the 2nd respondent referred supra, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition as under: “The respondent authorities are directed to issue notice to the 3rd respondent, indicating the constructions made by him in deviation of the sanctioned plan and calling upon him to submit his explanation, and after taking into consideration the explanation, if any, that may be submitted by him, they shall pass appropriate orders and take necessary action in accordance therewith.” The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 18th June, 2010. IBL