\€> .ii' ; 1 tf( c f IN TH£ .HIGH COURT. O? _JUDICATUR£_OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR, WRIT PSriTION KO.,223 /2005 BErXTIONSRS vi^"^/ iW /w (1) KaUash seni, son of shri Gffiellal seni, ageS 40 years, resident of Sakari, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) (2) ShambhH Dewangan, son o£ shrt '^ Laxm.tNarayan Dewangan, aged 3l years, Resident o£ Katlyapara Juna Bl.3.aspur. Bllaspur( c. o.) ^-<3) Shiv Prasad Agre, son of shri J.K. Agre, aged 40 years, Resident of Taarbasjaar BUaspur. .•" <?<^ ^4) ^-«5> II J'i'l "^- 'KI fa.. ^-rs) •H >t,l / ^ri ^<8) JS« smt. Kumari Martina w/e shri SauRam Kartina, aged 45 years, Resident of Taarbahar Bilaspur, shanker Yadav son o£ shrl Baiaicu- Yadav, aged 40 years, Res'.ldent pf Taarisahar, Bilaspur (C.S.) Shiv yrasad Prajapatl son o£ °" Shci Sadan I>al prajapatl, aged 37 yeara, S.esiQenk of Juna- Bilaspur, Distt, Bilaspur (c.G.), Ramesh Tiwari, sen ef shrl safeaya Narayan Tiwari, aged 40 y'ears, Resi-dent ®fTaarbahar BilaiSpUF (G.G.) ^jy»ishan YaSav son of shri Bhukhan Lal Yadav. aged 45 years ,•'3 resldent ef village Bharni Disttj||} Bilaspur (c.G.) ' ^lj ^f^ ^<9) Ka.leshwsr singh chaahan son e£ i ,^ Shri Kunj R*n ehauhan, aged 45 j ^ years, resident eg •wfillage Balma.^I D.i.stfc. Bilaspur. (G.G.'): '' :/' . t:^i| Shiv Ersssd YsdaiV son ef ^stasM Bhau Ram Y»day, aged •42 5EeSi?^w^ resident ®£vlllag'e Btiaiia'i-^^aSS Bilaspur (c.G«.) //2// All yetitloners G/o. Kallash soni Son of shrj. said Lal s@ni R^® Sakari, Tahsll sakarl, Blstriet Bllaspur,(chhattisgarh) VfiRSUS RESPONDiSNTS ^( 1) The'Mynic.i.pal oorparatlon Bilaspur; through ifes Admlnis-1 tratoi; Bilaspur (c.G.) /{, 2) The oommissioner Itun.tcitpal | Oorporat.ton,BUaspur (c.G.) /(3) Stafce of chhattisgarh;through Secretary, oepartment ef i I.eesl self oevt. D.K.s. Bhawaaj Raipur {c.G.) WRIT PETITION UNfliEai ARTIGLiBS 226/5OT OF THS, CQNSSIISS'EEQW O? IJSBlA.JFOR. XSSU^GE .GP l»J;T/t®I3S_3N,JE^nNA;i® ,G®gH,IW M^OfSWS CS^IOfU'iW' 0 VOS.:'SXRS@'W3S^ OKQBRS. , ': • : ' "•, •; ! .: ^y. \.;, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: B1LASPUK Sin^eBenCh: Hon'bleSlui8aUshK.flgnaiotri,J. W.JP._Wo.2230E'2005 Petitioners : Kaifesh Soniaad ofhers Versus Respondents The Muiiicipal Gorpoiation, Bflaspur & others ShriJ.S.Baiaik, couiiscrfbr thepetitioners. Shri P. ©BKakafe^^^S^ A.S; Kachliaroa3|t^:,;eGiu:nsela^:fhe , tand :2.:'. ^/NpDfi.:&rlBije':respCTn.deiit;No.'3.:' ' ^: . '.:'1^.; .;.-.:'. ORALORDER (a9t'tMarch,2006) 1. The petitiQners have filed this petition prayiug fhat the respondents be directed to appoint the petitioners as daity wages eiaployees in coBipliance of the order dated 21.8.1997 passedbytheSupreineCourtiaCivilAppeal No. 104/1996. The petitioaers have further prayed that the respondeats be dipeeted to take fhem ui einployinent icuiiediately. 2. Shri P. Diwakar, Seiuor couiisel wifh SIui A.S. •^. ~. : : : : " • . Kachhawaha, coun.SGla.ppearing forthe respondents No. 1 ..'7 . • ' :• • ;'.-. '•: ;. and 2 cleariystatEdia fh^afiBdayitdalrf 16.1.2(^06 that fhe petitbners have been appQJitted vide tetter ;da^ 20.9.2005. - : ; 1.1 • ' . r •: •• . ' fi' i..a ^M K •<',: E'M 1 Bablu 3. Leanied counselfor the petitioners adinits the position that the petitioners Uave been appointed on daily wages basis and as sueh nothalg survives ID this petitioa. 4. However, lcaraed ebiuisel appearing for the petitioners makes aa oral subnussioa that the peytioiiers be graated parity at the pay scate of regiilar einployees of tlie Govemirient The petitionera have not submitted any pleadiags aad have not made aay prayer fo fhis effect in their petition. Hence, this pi^er caaaot be granted iu fhis petttiDn..How^^r, th& getifioiieis are at .•.^tlle-saBife^ifs^ads'ised^isegaBa^'p^ : • 5. In view of fhe ^jpegoHig, ^e writ peitttion st^^ disposed of. No oider as to costs, Sd/- ,• ;, ^bK.Agrihom Jud&e ^sJi^S