1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3325 OF 2010 Atlanta Limited ..Petitioner versus The Municipal Commissioner, Pune & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. M. M. Vashi i/b. M/s. M. P. Vashi & Associates for Petitioner. Mr. A. P. Kulkarni for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. S. R. Nargolkar – AGP for State – Respondent No. 3. CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : JUNE 09, 2010. P.C. : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent nos. 1 and 2. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the action of the respondent no. 1 blacklisting the petitioner company without following the principles of natural justice is unsustainable and liable to be set aside. 3. The learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 at this stage 1 itself has submitted that the respondent nos. 1 and 2 shall not give effect to the order dated 9th February 2010 whereby the petitioner company has been blacklisted and seeks permission to initiate fresh proceedings in this regard. It is further submitted that the respondent nos. 1 and 2 shall follow the principles of natural justice and take decision in this regard only thereafter. 4. In the backdrop of the above referred fact, it is evident that the grievance of the petitioner against the order dated 9th February 2010 no more survives. Hence, the petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed by the respondent nos. 1 and 2. (D. D. SINHA, J.) (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)