MP 1 WP3630_11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3630 OF 2011 Shri Krishna Pomanna Bhosale and others ... Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and another ... Respondents Mr. S. A. Rajeshirke for Petitioners. Mr. S. D. Rayrikar, AGP for Respondents. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. FRIDAY, MAY 06, 2011 P. C. : Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent. 2. In the present case, an award has been passed under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act in favour of the present petitioners. Challenging the said award, the First Appeal has been preferred in this Court. In the said First Appeal, an ad-interim relief was granted by this Court on certain conditions. However, since the respondent-State has failed to comply with the said conditions, the ad- interim relief stood automatically vacated. 3. In the meantime, the petitioners have moved the Executing Court for withdrawal of the amount. The said application has been allowed subject to the condition that the petitioner shall furnish a bank guarantee for the amount to be withdrawn. Being aggrieved thereby, the present petition. MP 2 WP3630_11 4. The facts in the present case are squarely covered by the facts in a bunch of petition being Writ Petition No. 7136 of 2007 along with the companion matters decided by me on 24th January 2008 at Aurangabad. 5. Rule is, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b) and (c). (B.R. GAVAI, J)