THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition Nos.23142, 23145 and 23147 of 2010 DT.25.10.2010 Between: Agameer Nyamathulla Basha … Petitioner And The District Collector, Kadapa, Kadapa District and others. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.D.Seshasayana Reddy Counsel for respondents: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following ORDER: COMMON ORDER: Since all these writ petitions raise common issues, they are taken up for hearing and disposal together. In these cases, the common grievance of the petitioners is that respondent No.4 is refusing to register the sale deeds presented before him on the ground that the property is classified as Government land as per RSR of Rayachoti. At the hearing, it is agreed between the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue that a batch of writ petitions, wherein an identical issue has been raised, was disposed of by this Court in W.P.Nos.16434 of 2010 and batch, on 29.09.2010. This Court held that the entry in RSR by itself is not conclusive as regards the title over the property and that if the Government is of the opinion that the lands in question belong to it, it can always claim the same through appropriate Court of law and mere registration of the documents, executed in respect thereof, by respondent No.4, would not in any manner take away its right as such. The reasoning contained in the above judgment applies in all fours to these cases. Accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed in terms of the judgment, dated 29.09.2010, in W.P.Nos.16434 of 2010 and batch. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petitions, W.P.M.P.Nos.29528, 29533 and 29531 of 2010 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Date: 25.10.2010. VGB