~ ‘ ax“ i N? ’ A. a p‘td IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COU T OF JUDICAT CHHATTISGARH At gmAsrUR Writ Petition c9 No. i Léf’ /2007 { /Niharika Vypvasaik Parisar Kalyan Samiti Bhilai—3; Through its : President - Ganesh Ram Chandrakar S/o Shri. Chandulal Chandrakar, Aged” years, Occupation—Business, Resident of : Viilage 3L Post~ Ouari, Tehsil : Patan DistrictvDurg (CG) PETITIONER Versus ,1: State of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary, Department of Urban Development, D.K.S.Bhawan, Manualaya, WWG) 22 \ The President Municipal Council Bhilai—Charoda District : DQRG (CG) MM The Chief Executive Owen, Mumclpal Council ,7 Bhilai—Charoda District z DURG (CG) FOR ISSQANQE OF APPROPRIATE ‘W_;R_IT, ORDER égg DIRECTIONS IN k THE NATURE lgE CEgTIORARY, MANDAMU§ ETC. W z vXI—HC—22 w? C C). l m Oa’ 31 §3 W %#$a&$ $m$v%a m mmawfga $mk Hmm%§kéR%E %s#%wa&v 02.02.2007 On being menfioned, The maH‘er‘ is faken-up for hearing. Shri U‘Hnm Pandey‘ counsel for The pefi‘rioner. é 5hr'i A5 Kachhaw‘ahn’, $over' 1menf Advocufe for respondzn‘f No.1 / Sfa‘l'e. None for e‘l'her responden'rs. Heard. Some of 'l'he individuals ‘I'ook par? in the auc’rion for iease of plo‘rs organizad by responden‘i No.2. Their bids were high: bu‘i fhe same were no‘i accepied by respondeni No.2. Pefiiioner, a regisfered socie‘ry did nof purchase or fook parf in fhe auc‘iion' proceeding. Terms and condii'ions of The uuci‘ion proceedings were published and agreeing wi+h Those condii'ions, “the pari‘icipanfs iook par‘r in fhe said proceedings and according +0 ihosa condifions, Municipal CounciL Bhiiai - Charoda i.e. respc nden‘i‘ No.2 has kepi‘ reserved fhe righf To accep‘i‘ 'i‘he bid. Peiiiioner, regisi'ered wasnof a 1'0 fhe auci‘ion proceeding a regisi'ered soc: ‘i'y a pariy has no righf fo raise any griev ce against fhe same: even ofherwise fhe individuals‘said i'o be members of The pei’ii'ioner sociefy, do nof gei any legal righi under Arficle 226 of ihe (ionsfi‘i’ufion of India To challenge The non- accepTance of bid by respondenT No.2 on The counT ThaT They parTicipaTed, gave highesT bid and deposiTed pari ial amount In The resulT, The peTiTion is liable To be dismissed summarily and is accordingly dismissed. In view of The above order, M.(W.)P.No.3lo/W i i Sd/- ‘ V.K.Shrivastava padmu Judge