MC 1497/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR RS GARG HON’BLE MR JUSTICE BP KATAKEY MC No.1497/2010 Heard Mr PK Bhoumic, learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner had filed the present writ petition claiming the reliefs that the court be pleased to direct the concerned respondents to release the gra tuity, provident fund, leave encashment and arrears of pay. Undisputedly, the OA No.1237/09 was filed by the respondent Smti Veena M allick (respondent No.5) claiming the benefits/retrial benefits of the deceased and interim order was passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal B ench, New Delhi in the said OA No.1237/2009, the said order was also challenged in the present writ petition. It appears that during pendency of this writ petit ion the Tribunal proceeded with the hearing of the Original Application, finally allowed the Original Application with a rider that the final order passed by th e Tribunal on 27-4-2010 shall be subject to the decision in the present writ pet ition. The petitioner seek to challenge the order dated 27-4-2010 passed by the Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi on the ground that if the interim order had been subject matter of this writ petition then the fina l order can also be examined by this court. In our considered opinion the said order is required to be challenged by the petitioner before the Delhi High Court because the cause of action accrued to them at Delhi because the order has been passed by the Tribunal for the first time at New Delhi. The amendment application, in our considered opinion, is not maintainabl e. It is accordingly dismissed. It is, however, made clear that the Bench hearing the writ petition shal l decide the matter without being influenced by the final order passed by the Pr incipal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi because the order itse lf says it has been passed subject to the decision in the writ petition.