HON'BLE S.B. IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE^No. 37^- /2011 -i- Manoj Durga, S/o Late Shri Hari Durga, Aged about 27 years, R/o Shreenagar, R.B.H. Colony, Balaji Chowk, Near W.R.S. Colony, Raipur, C.G. PETITIONER: "^^ ^%^'" >'^'' x^ €/y' REsKo^bENT/ VERSUS CONTEMNER: ^ii i.i.,. —n Dr. Subir Kumar Mukherjee, Director, Medical Education, Old Nurses Hostel, Raipur, C.G. CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITJJTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF^QURT ACT. 3TT^T^T'f^1W HSH ^TT^T $r)*iicb Y^j ^-5T ';?TFn^PT, yixil •<-<<i<o, f^d |<y ^< ^,^^...^.t.:.C.^,..27.^^ ^n^T'^q^RT (T^f^5^) '^^HW^rf^T 3?T^T FSB : Hon*ble Shri Manindifa Mohan Shrivastava, J.1 21.10.2011 Shri Alok Dewangan, Heard on admission. This contempt petitic alleging willful disobediencej inW.P. (S)No.5962/10. Leamed counsel foi 20.10.2010, the petition ^ statement made by the the direction is issued /representation. The repre^i No decision has been respondent has sat over tihj< the Court expressing hop^ order was passed by the C^ by the State Govt. Stajte Even fhe hope expres^ case, fhe background in w^i _cespnnriftnt tp take the decilsion cr)i^fci<j1tl 'RP^Jf "^* 'fe^ <P»1^1< ^ 31RPT 37T^?r ounsel for the petitioner. n has been filed by the petitioner ofthe order dated 20.10.2010 passed the petitioner submits that on ras disposed of in view of categoric counsel that he has no objection if for deciding the pendtng appeal sntationwas submitted on 2.11.2010. till date. It appears ftiat fhe matter treating the order passed by only as advisoiy, ignoring that fhe urt in view of the spect&c stand taken t4ken $ed by fhe Court and in this particular lich fhe order was passed, obliged the L. It is clarified ftiat fhe order dated XI-HC—78 3TI^T ^T Rl'lJcb ^Tsff 3TT^T 9FHT5F ^£TT^i^l<n^;^xil^|<o, [®ldl^^< Hl*l<^Ta»*iicb -^ 200 ^?r TR^ (<ic<f^<^) t^nWRf^T 3T[^?T z- 20.10.2010 requires responc per the order ofthe Court. If no decision is taker the date of receipt of copy c entitled to rcvive the petitio] has not been taken, seriou^ against the respondent. With the aforesaid disposed of. Gni^<fll 'RR^Jf ^* fe^t ^^K ^stRm^n^T lent to take decision in the matter as wifhin a period of one monfh from |f this order, ttie petitioner would be \t and if it is found fhat fhe decision view of the matter would be taken q'bseryations, the petition is fmally Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge