IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.618 of 2005 BISHWANATH CHOUDHARY Versus SHRI KRISHNA BHARATI & ORS ----------- 17. 4.9.2008. Respondent No.5-appellant, aggrieved by the order dated 3.5.2005 passed by a learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C.No.762 of 2004 allowing the writ application and quashing the order of demotion as also the consequential order, has preferred this appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, Senior Advocate, appearing on behalf of the appellant, submits that only grievance of the appellant is that in the garb of the impugned order, the employer, i.e. District Rural Development Agency shall not proceed against the writ petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Prasad Singh, Senior Advocate, appears on behalf of Respondent No.1. The apprehension of the learned counsel for the appellant is absolutely misconceived. Setting aside the order of demotion and the consequential order, shall not preclude the employer to proceed 2 against the writ petitioner in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observation, this appeal stands dismissed. (C.K.Prasad) (Dr.Ravi Ranjan) ahk