^li. y PETITIONER [Defendant No.4] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE A-V BILASPUR CIVIL REVISION N0. / 5^~ OF 2007 : Smt. KanchanqSingh Sohela, wife of Shri Sameer Singh Sohela, aged about 55 years, resident of 102, Shanti Niketan, in front of Kalda Nursing, Choubey Colony Raipur ..^ Vs RESPONDENTS [Plaintiffs] \.^ \^ ^y ..-•""^".y ^^' o9 ^'.^^ 1. Roop Meghani, aged about 53 years, son of Barunomal Meghani, resident of Civil Lines, Raipur. 2. Sarvanand Meghani, aged about 50 years, son of Barunomal Meghani, resident of Civil.Lines. Raipur. 3. Bharat Lal Makhija, aged about 44 years, son of Bulfrn^l^TiAakhija, resident of Ajl*" Shyam Market, Pandritarai, Raipur. <-- 4. Rajkumar Chitlangiya, son of Late Badri Narayan Chitlangiya, aged about 57 years, resident of 6J Farishta Complex, Raipur. 5. Smt. Kusum Chitlangiya, wife of Shri Rajkumar ^^ Defendant No.l to 3 Chitlangiya, aged about 57 years, resident of 6J Farishta Complex, Raipur 6. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Malviya Road, Raipur. 7. The Nagar Niveshak, Municipal Corporation, Malviya Road, Raipur. 8. The Zonat Officer, Zone No.3, office of The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur. PETITION UNOER SECTION 115 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1908 ^ ^ •—78 ^H^t^lfoion ^iTW^TiCTW -u Kvr '3'^ •^i<<i<rt<<» ^t%-^''i<o, fatii^^ wwir-s^^P-^^-K^---^^2op^ 3ff^?T TR?Rfc (^fiyf^) ¥CTW^f^t^S^ S.B. Hon'ble Shri JustJceM.I4! 27-10.2008 S.hri'Kshltij Sharma, cou] Learned counse! app| with the passage of time this| Therefore, the revisl infructuous. No ordsr asto d <^(^tCT^ti WR^f ^f f^St <fa^M ^^if^31T^T Agarwa! |isej 'for the appijcant. , |aring for the appjteant submlts that ireyislon has become infructuous. |on Is as has become losts. Sd/- N.K.Aga'wfal 3ud9® 'Y,