.^Bw^v ^|1°9 HIGH COURT^QECHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANT RESPONDENTS M.C.C. No. 06 of2009 Basanti Kumari Sin^ wife ofDeonarayan SingL aged 60 years, Skhatri By Caste, Resident ofManipur, Ward Bilaspur Road Ambikapur, Thana & T^isil Ambikapia-, District Surguja (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS 1. Ishwar Singh, S/o late Raghuwaash Sirk^i, aged 45 years, carpenter by professiom Kshatri by caste, R/o Manipur; Police Station and Thana Ambikqmr, District Surguja (CG). 2. Wachha Anjana Bhatt, wtfe of Krishnmnohan Bhatt, aged 55 years, BranAan by Caste. 3. Anand Kumar Agrawal, S/o Shyamlal Agrawal, aged 45 years, Ag^awal by Caste. 4. Rameshwar AgrawaL S./o late Tetohand AgrawaL aged 45 years, Agrawal by caste. 5. Babulal Agrawal^ S/o Tekcha&d Agrawal, aged 40 years, Agrawal by caste. 6. Smt. Prema Bai, wife ofSudama Sin^i, aged 50 yeairs, Kshafri by Caste. (AI1 are resident of Manipur Bilspar Road Road, Thaiia and Tahsil Ambikapw, District Surguja (GG). 7. Nazul Officer, Nazul Department office of the Collector, Surguja, Ambikapur (Chhattisgarli). 8. Collector, Surguja, Ambikapur (Respondent No. 2 to 8 all are defendaitf) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF WRTT PETrTOIN N0. (227) PR. NOt 6186^008 ON DATED 10.12^2008 SB: Hon'ble SlulSattsh K.Asnfliotri^J. Present: Shri J.S-Baraik. Advocate for tfae applicant. Shri Bhaskar Payasi, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respoadents 7 & 8 ORALORDER (Passed on 14W day of January, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel for the applicant submite that tie coumel fer the applicant could not appear on account of bonafide mistake, ther^bre, W.P. (227) P.R. 6186 of 2008, which was diaaissed on 10.12.2008, may be restored to its file. 2. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been showa, W.P. (227) P.R. 6186 of2008 is restored to the original file, subject to payment of cost of Rs< 1000/- by fhe applicant to the High Court Legal Aid Committee. 3. A copy ofthis order be placed on record ofthe original writ petition aad fhe same be listed for hearing. 1 Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit