IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.28357 of 2008 Between: M. Padma, W/o.Prabhakar, aged 35 years, Occ: FP Shop Dealer, Endapally, Velgatoor Mandal, Karimnagar District … Petitioner And The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli, Karimnagar District, and two others … Respondents Order: The petitioner, a fair price shop dealer, has filed this writ petition questioning order Proc.No.D/3296/06, dated 14-12-2008, passed by the first respondent, Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli, Karimnagar District, suspending her authorization with regard to F.P.Shop No.4826 of Endapally village, Velgatur Mandal. The aforesaid order was passed referring to the report of the Tahsildar, Velgatur, alleging that the petitioner has diverted the rice meant for public distribution and involved in clandestine business; thus she has contravened the provisions of the A.P. State Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2008. This court, by order dated 29-12-2008, suspended the impugned order, pending further orders, and kept open to the respondents to conduct enquiry into the allegations leveled against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no reasons are recorded in the impugned order for suspending the authorization of the petitioner and the allegations leveled against her are false and she has not supplied the commodities to anybody else other than the cardholders. The impugned order has been passed suspending the authorization of the petitioner pending enquiry as early as on 14-12-2008. While suspending the impugned order, this court kept open to the respondents to conduct enquiry. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the enquiry, if not already completed, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order and pass appropriate orders. Till such time, the impugned order shall remain suspended. No order as to costs. ___________________ (R. SUBHASH REDDY, J) September 6, 2010 MRR