IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 4661 of 2011 Date of Decision : 20.06.2011 Mast Ram ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ............Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate For the respondents: Mr. R. K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl.A.G. and Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “A) That a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to give work charge status/regularize the services of the petitioner after completion of 10 years of daily waged service and monitory benefits with retrospective effect to the petitioner. B) That a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner after completion of 8 years of daily waged service as per decision of the respondents themselves.” 2. According to the petitioner, his case is covered by the decision of Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya Vs. State of H.P. and others 1994 Supplement (2) S.C.C. 316. Petitioner submits that he would file an appropriate representation furnishing all factual details 2 before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for him to do so. The first respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in light of the decision referred to above, within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment referred to above and a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the first respondent. 3. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. June 20, 2011 (rana/pankaj)