..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2246 OF 2008 Umesh Sitaram Chavan. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.V.V.Kanade, Adv. for the Applicant. Ms.P.P.Shinde, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 11th July, 2008. DATED : 11th July, 2008. DATED : 11th July, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.248 of 2008 of Chaturshingi police station, Pune. The said case is mainly under Section 326 of IPC. 3. There are two injured persons i.e.Deepak Shinde and Pravin Shinde. Deepak Shinde has sustained fracture of the skull and other injuries due to which he is not in a condition to give his statement. The other injured witness Pravin ..(2).. Shinde has specifically stated that the applicant came to the spot. There were other persons with the applicant and all of them assaulted him and his brother Deepak with sticks and iron bars. 4. The learned Advocate for the applicant submitted that Pravin Shinde has not given the full name of the applicant and he has only stated that Umesh came there. He has submitted that this would not indicate that it was the present applicant who came to the spot. 5. No doubt the witness Pravin Shinde has stated only the first name of the applicant. However, it is an aspect which needs to be investigated and for that purpose custody of the applicant would be necessary. Hence, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. Application for anticipatory bail is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)