IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No. 9746-C of 2008 and RSA No. 3255 of 2008(O&M) Date of Decision: April 26, 2010 Narinder Kumar ...... Appellant Versus Gurinder Singh and another ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.Rajesh Bhatheja, Advocate for the appellant. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. CM No. 9746-C of 2008 For the reasons recorded, delay of 11 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. CM stands disposed of. RSA No. 3255 of 2008 This appeal has been filed against concurrent judgments of the courts below dismissing the suit of the appellant for injunction restraining the respondents from encroaching upon or blocking the street which allegedly was the only means of ingress and egress to his house and was his private street. Both the courts have held that the street is a public passage. The following question has been proposed:- “Whether the impugned judgments and decrees of both the courts below are illegal and erroneous in law?” The question proposed is a general question. Learned counsel has not been able to persuade me that the findings of the courts below are either based on no evidence or on such perverse misreading of the evidence so as to be liable for interference under Section 100 CPC. Consequently holding the question proposed against the appellant, this appeal is dismissed. No costs. Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE April 26, 2010 sunita