62 IN THE MGH CQURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPU&rC.G.] WKT PETITIONfS) N0_y-^^ ^0^6 PETITIONER ^,^Dr. Bramhanand Markand^y S/o Late^ .^i^ Dhartna Markandey Aged-about 47 ^%^-' .^^y ^y years R/o C/o Nutan Chandrakar, Sanjay Nagar, Ward No. 1, Kurud, Distt.- Dhamatari [C.G.j ^y A--' RESPONDENTS WjWy.^ .y VERSUS l.State of Chhattisgarh ^ Through- Secretary Higher Education Technical, Human Resource Science & Technology Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur [C.G.] 2.The Conunissioner, ^ Higher Education State Of Chhattisgarh [C.G.] S.The Principal, ^ Goveminent Lahiri College, Chirmiri, Distt.- Korea [C.G.] 4.Smt. Aarati Tiwari W/o Abhay// Narayan Tiwari, In-Chai^e- Principal, Goveniment Lahiri College, Chinruri, Distfc- Korea [C.G.] S.The Principal, ^ Govt. College, Kurud, Distt- Dhamatari [C.G.j WRJT PETITIQNUNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIAFQR ISSUANCE OFAPPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTIONS ^j:'^-^'^^-^^^s^fss^ 2. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 5464 of 2006 Petitioner : Dr. Brainhaiiand Marlsandey Versus Respondents Stete of Chhattisgarh & others Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr, Justice Satish K. Agfl.ibotsl. Shri Sanjay Petel, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Deputy Goveminent Advocate for the respondents No. l, 2, 3 and 5. Shri PrafuU Bharat, counsel for fhe respondent No. 4. Q_R DE_R (Passed on 13d1 Day ofDecember, 2006) The petitioner has been transfen'ed froin Goveminent Lahiri CoUege, Chirmirt, Diatnct Koriya to Govenunent CoUege, Kurud, District Dhamtari by order dated 30.6.2006. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction to the respondent No. 3 that his service records and last payinent certificate be sent to the new place of posting i.e. Govt. CoBege, Kurud, so that he would get his salaiy. Shri Arun Sao, leanied Deputy Goveminent Advocate appearing for the respondents No. 1, 2, 3 and 5 subiait ttiat the documents, as required by ftie petitioner to be sent to fhe new place ofposting, will be done within a period of two weeks. In view of fhe above aforeinentioned submissions of the respondents/authorities, nofhing survives in fhis inatter. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge