IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 127 of 2011 a/w CWP Nos. 139, 140, 153, 155 & 175 of 2011 Decided on: March 01, 2011. 1. CWP No. 127 of 20110 Bheshi Lal & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & ors. 2. CWP No. 139 of 2011 Roshan Lal vs. State of H.P. & ors. 3. CWP No. 140 of 2011 Kala Devi vs. State of H.P. & ors. 4. CWP No. 153 of 2011 Kashmir Singh & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & ors. 5. CWP No. 155 of 2011 Pradeep Kumar & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & ors. 6. CWP No. 175 of 2011 Mohinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : Mr. A. K. Gupta, Advocate For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A. G. & Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A. G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim work charge status, arrears, seniority and other consequential benefits from the date they completed eight years of service. Reliance is placed on the decision of this Court dated 28th July, 2 2010 rendered in CWP No. 2735 of 2010, titled as Rakesh Kumar versus State of H.P. and others. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioners may file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the second respondent within a period of one month from today. The second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in the light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The petitioners will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment referred to in this judgment while submitting the representation(s). 3. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s) if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 01, 2011 ( Justice Sanjay Karol ), (rana/Vt) Judge.