IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 5653 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.4.2009 Dr. Amarjit Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Saurav Khurana, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL J **** The only grouse of the petitioner in the present case is that inspite of there being backlog in terms of the reservation policy, the petitioner has not been considered for the post of Professor though eligible for that. It is claimed that respondent No.3 was promoted on the post of Professor Pathology on December 4, 2006. Thereafter he had even made a representation to the respondent No.1 on April 16, 2008 to consider his claim for promotion as still one post of Professor Pathology was lying vacant. The representation has not been considered till date. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.1 to decide the representation already filed by petitioner or any supplementary representation, which may be filed upto 30.4.2009. The respondent No.1 shall decide the same on or before July 31, 2009 by passing a speaking order. The Civil Writ Petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) 17.4.2009 JUDGE Reema