IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 4TH APRIL 2011 / 14TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 10663 of 2011(G) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- PAVITHRAN, AGED 68 YEARS, S/O.LATE KESAVAN, THEKKEMADAM HOUSE, UDAYANAPURAM P.O., VAIKOM. BY ADVS. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.V.JOJO RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM - 686 001. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VAIKOM - 686 141. 3. RAVEENDRAN, S/O.LATE KESAVAN, KURUPPAMTHARA HOUSE, VADAKKEMURI, VAIKOM - 686 141. R1 & R2 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 10663 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 4th day of April, 2011 J U D G M E N T The pleadings in the writ petition itself show that there is a dispute between the petitioner and his brother, the 3rd respondent concerning a property, on which both are claiming title. In this writ petition, his grievance is that the 3rd respondent is removing sand from the property in question. Making the allegation as above, petitioner has filed representations before the authorities and have approached this Court seeking action on the said representations. 2. In my view, from the pleadings itself it is obvious that the dispute is essentially one of civil nature. Therefore, the remedy open to the petitioner is to move the Civil Court. With that liberty, the writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp