IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6437 of 2009 1. PRAMOD PASWAN 2. Subodh Paswan 3. Ajodh Kumar Paswan @ Ajod Paswan 4. Rambriksh Paswan 5. Rajesh Paswan 6. Chhotu Paswan @ Kush Kumar Paswan 7. Budhuwa Paswan @ Lov Kumar Paswan 8. Binod Singh 9. Badho Paswan Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case under Sections 307, 379, 355, 504 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel submits that the complaint was lodged after three months from the date of occurrence. It is submitted that the accused side has filed a case under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code on 7.5.2008 itself. Learned counsel submits that the accused side also sustained injury. He further asserts that allegations that Pramod Paswan caused garasa injury on informant and his son Mithun Manjhi are not correct. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners namely, 2 to 9 i.e., Subodh Paswan, Ajodh Kumar Paswan @ Ajod Paswan, Rambriksh Paswan, Rajesh Paswan, Chhotu Paswan @ Kush Kumar Paswan, Budhuwa Paswan @ Lov Kumar Paswan, Binod Singh and Badho Paswan are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of five weeks in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case - 2 - No. 281/08 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000 (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Shergati, District- Gaya, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. So far as petitioner no. 1 Pramod Paswan is concerned, he should surrender and pray for regular bail. If the learned Magistrate finds that neither the informant nor his son sustained any Garasa injuries, in that circumstances he too would be released on bail. P. Kumar (S. P. Singh, J.)