...1... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.40 OF 2006 PETITION NO.40 OF 2006 PETITION NO.40 OF 2006 Dharma D.Jadhav ...Petitioner Versus Dadaji D.Jadhav ...Respondent Shri S.M.Sabrad for the Petitioner. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE DATE DATE : JANUARY 10, 2006. : JANUARY 10, 2006. : JANUARY 10, 2006. P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Sabrad for the petitioner. The objection raised by the petitioner to the execution of the compromise decree passed in the year, 1998 in a Suit filed in the year, 1988 has been rightly rejected by the Executing Court. The entire exercise appears to be to delay handing over possession of the lands which admittedly go to the share of the plaintiff-decree holder. No reason to interfere under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition dismissed. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.)