-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 553 OF 2007 Nirmaladevi S. Chaudhary ... Petitioner versus The Collector, Mumbai Suburban Dist. and others ... Respondents None for the petitioner. Mrs. P.A. Purandare for respondent No.3. Mr. Abhijeet Wagh, instructed by M/s. Uttangale & Co., for respondent No. 4. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE: APRIL 26, 2007. P.C. Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3-Corporation submits that the Corporation would forward the documents submitted by the petitioner to the Slum Rehabilitation Authority as the petitioner's case has already been considered as eligible by the Corporation. The Slum Rehabilitation Authority would consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with the rules and its policies and would pass appropriate orders within six weeks from today. In view of the statement made on -2- behalf of the third respondent, nothing survives in the petition and the same is accordingly disposed of. The third respondent-Corporation will abide by the statement made in the Court. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.