CMP(M) No.531 of 2008 In Civil Review No.41/2008 10.7.2008 Present: Mr. Ashok Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1,2 and 4. Mr. B. M. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.3. There is delay of one year and three days in filing the present review petition. The only reason given by the review petitioner for condoning the delay is as follows: “that the review petitioners could not file the review petition in time due to the reason that the copy of the judgment as passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of the High Court was delivered to the SPA of the review petitioner only on 9.1.2008 and the SPA of the review petitioner deposited the cost as imposed by the Hon’ble High Court on the same day. The judgment was passed on 15.5.2007 and copy was attested and supplied on 2.6.2007. Thus there is a delay of 1 year and 3 days.” Nothing has been mentioned, as to when Sh. B. N. Metha, who was the original counsel, applied for the copy of order of this court, whether such copy was received by him or not, whether Shri B. N. Mehta, original counsel informed the parties about the result of the petition or not. The averments made in the application are absolutely vague and no case is made out for condonation of delay, even as per the averments made in the application. Furthermore, the Special Attorney of the petitioner received the copy of judgment on 9.1.2008 and the review petition has been filed on 1.7.2008. There is no explanation as to why after 9.1.2008 the review petitioner did not file the review petition within time. Therefore, there is no merit in the application and the same is dismissed. (Deepak Gupta),J. July 10, 2008 (Surinder Singh),J. (D)