W’ , 2&4, BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR LNGQME TAX CASE NofQ/}C L299? ‘q @L’ APPELLANT (Commissioner of Income Tax, Raipur % VERSUS ,e K Mohan Lal Jain, Proprietor : M/s. Saheli Jewellers, Supela, Bhilai (C.G.) \ e APPEAL U S. 260 A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961 \L/ @{7 XI-HC 78 fox/1L0 0 ”0 www.mwm, WW TM CW (W0 Névét 200 mmmgiaaaw mwfi‘w zgmna%a&&w $WWI§WW %%maném DIVISEQN BENCH: ’ & '‘ ‘—‘ 08.04.2009 Shxi S. Rajeshwar Rab, cussl for the appellant. q‘u , The mattsr is listed on deult. fa Learned counsel for the ppsllmlt pray for ar is grai1t€d two w§€ks’ tima‘to mmove the defat. If thf: default is not reved within the stipulated period, the appea shall automatically stad dismissed Without reference to the >I/ ‘1. a1f HGNBLE sHRI DHIRENDRA MISHRA HGWELE SHRE RAJESEEN"D ' ' ‘FAI!WI3Pzz JJ \ a s id uL ma l n Bench. Sdl- Sd/- HmENDRA NHSHRA V» Judge R.L. Jhanwar Judge