(2 ^ v IN TOE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BILA5PUR, CHHATTISGARH ^l^i5S^ffi ^'.;7;.f-riS:^^ HB? SiSiaigf ,^^? ^:,i.. s'":s- ^•i^ ^.'S!l 1 WRIT PETmON No. *39" OF 200^ PEIATIONEIl M/s. Chtiaaisgarh Mlnerais and Smelting Limited, a Cpmpany registered under the Gompanles Act 1956, Plot No. 5, Uria Industrial Area, Urta, Ralpur (Chhattisgarh) Versus RESPONDENTS l--t&\'^':.^C^-v ^^IQ.S"-^^'^' .. ^^^'" ^ &t l^- 2. 3. 4. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, department of Mineral Resourees, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The ChhatBsgarh Mineral Devetopment Corporatlon Llmited, 27/520, New Shanti Nagar, Shankar Nagar Road, Ralpur (Chhatttsgarh) State of Madhya Pradesh through the Secretary, department of Mineral Resourcss, Vatlabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) Madhya Prade^i State Mlning Corporation Limited, 2nd Floor, Paryavas Bhawan,Bhopal fM.P.) WRTT PrmiONUNDER ARTCCI.E 228/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTIOWI OPIHDJA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR PETITIONER fRIT PETITION N0.39 OF 2003 M/s Chhattisgarh Smelting Limited linerals and RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ petition under Articie 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. None for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. Shri Yogesh Pandey, Advocate forthe respondent No.2. ^ ORDER.fORAU (Passed on this 26th day of Juiy, 2010) The matter is called for hearing hvice. On both occasions, none appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. in view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of 'rosecution. ^sssm Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge •K