1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 18. AO/57/2008 (MUSHTAQUE ANSARI AHMED ANSARI AND ORS V/S GANPAT MANOHARRAO SHINDE) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.J.H.Deshmukh, Adv., for the appellant. Respondent served. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:3-2-2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard learned Counsel for the appellant extensively. Sole respondent served, absent. 2. Refusal to grant injunction as sought by the plaintiff is subject of challenge. Considering the recitals in the agreement of sale, learned Judge was justified, prima facie, in refusing to entertain the injunction as the plaintiffs did not prima facie establish the very transaction in its letter and spirit. The dates of execution of the document was also in controversy. At this stage, further interference is not 2 warranted. The order of rejection of injunction below Exh. 5 does not require any interference. Appeal From Order is dismissed, however, learned Judge seized with the matter shall dispose of the same expeditiously within a year, considering the matter to be of 2007. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/57-08ao