IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2010 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1932 RP.No. 536 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.12391/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 IN THE WRIT PETITION --------------------------------- 1. THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEVASWOM COMMISSIONR, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPAL RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER & 3RD RSEPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION: --------------- 1. U.N.THAMPY KUZHYPARAMBIL HOUSE, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM. 2. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER,ETTUMANNUR DEVASWOM, ETTUMANNUR. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. ------------------------ R.P.No. 536 OF 2010 in W.P.(C) NO.12391 OF 2010 ------------------------ Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2010 O R D E R Pius C.Kuriakose, J. We have heard Sri.P.G. Sri.Parameshwara Panicker, learned senior counsel for the review petitioners and also Sri. S.Krishnamoorthy, learned counsel for the respondents in the review petition. 2. Having regard to the submissions, we are convinced that the impugned judgment closing the writ petition came to be passed even before the learned senior counsel for the petitioners could appraise this court of the whole of the facts pertaining to Ext.P1. We also notice that I.A. No.1222/2010 seeking modification of Ext.P1 is pending. For both these reasons, we are inclined to recall the judgment. Hence, we recall the judgment allowing the review petition. Post the writ petition before the Bench dealing with R.P.No.536/2010 2 Devaswom matters along with connected matters. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE dpk