IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FA No.45 of 2009 RAM UDGAR DAS Versus SMT.CHINTA DEVI ----------- 4 9/9/2009 In view of section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 as interpreted by the Division Bench decision reported in 2008(4) PLJR 817, this appeal should be treated as a criminal revision. The counsel for the appellant is, accordingly, permitted to make necessary correction in course of the day. Since the appeal had been filed within the prescribed period of limitation, the question of limitation would not arise. Let it be listed before an appropriate Court for admission after necessary correction is made. Neyaz/ ( P.K. Misra, CJ.) (Anjana Prakash, J.)