•^ -^?vr^ S RFi^ :'''^ y^^t ^: ^^•v'^ c S .(^'l^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (2271 N0. ^rW^/200S PETITIONER:- PLAINTIFF 1'^ ^^ ^K-"' ^^yb"' <,,^pi(a'p^vl Smt. Chandrakanta Chhagani, w/o Shri G.K. Chhagani, Aged about 53 years, Occupation-House Wife, R/o 198, Sector-1, Gitanjali Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: DEFENDANTS 1. ^'^y ,-2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Girijanand Singh, S/o Hira Singh Chandrakar, R/o Kasardih, Nav-Durga Chowk, Durg (C.G.) Ramavatar Agrawal, S/o Nanhemal Agrawal, R/o Choubey Colony, Raipur (C.G.) Satyabala Agrawal, W/o Ramavatar Agrawal, R/o Choubey Colony, Raipur (C.G.) Ram Vishal Kurmi, S/o Chandulal Kurmi, R/o Village-Rakhi, Tahsil-Arang, Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Raipur (C.G.) Deputy Manager (Land), New Raipur Development Authority, Mantralaya, Near Mahanadi Gate, Raipur (C.G.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 READ WIJFS^»liFiebE-826OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS: 1"i \l>} HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (227) No. 6742/2008 PETITIONER Smt. Chandrakanta Chhagani Versus RESPONDENTS Girijanand Singh and others SB:- HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL, J PRESENT:- Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Raja Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents No. 2 & 3. Shri Raghvendra Pradhan with Smt. Shashi Bareth, Adv. for the respondent No. 4. Shri G.D. Waswani, Govt. Adv. for the respondent No. 5 Shri Rakesh Dubey, Advocate, for respondent No. 6. None appears for respondent No. 1. ORAL ORDER (24-1-2011) 1. In the light of the fact that the land has already been transferred in favour of New R.D.A. and compensation amount has been paid to respondents No. 2 and 3, Shri Ashish Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to file an application for amendment regarding incorporation of subsequent events took place during the pendency of his injunction application. 2. Liberty, as prayed, is granted. 3. With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn. It is directed that if such amendment application is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be decided by the trial court in accordance with law. ^l Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge