% '..> $-0s * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. M.C.75512011 & Crl.M.A 288L|20LI RAMA SHANKAR ALMAL & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through : Mr.Vinay Garg, Mr.Lalit Gupta, Ms.Babita and Mr.Deepak Agarwal, Advs versus TECHNOLOGY INFORMATION FORECASTING AND ASSESSMENT COUNCIL & ANR. ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Arvind Kr Singh, Adv for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ORDER 18.08.2011 1. By this instant petition the petitioners are praying for quashing of proceedings pending against them in the complaint case No.12Lgll under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 filed by respondent No.1. 2. In the said complaint case learned MM has issued summons to the petitioners vide order dated 08.07.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners/ accused Nos.3 & 4 namely sh.Rama shankar and sh.Pramod Kr Jhunjhunwala respectively had resigned from the Board of Directors of the compahy, much prior to the issuance of cheques in question i.e. between 28.9.2006 to 29.09.2008. 3. The respondent No.l/complainant filed the complaint against the petitioners and has impleaded four accused therein. In the complaint, accused No.1 is the company and accused No.2 is ,t!t CRL. M.C.7s5/2077 & Crl.M.A 2881/2077 Page L of2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified F h the Managing Director of the company. lf the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.3 & 4 is quashed, it will not affect the outcome of the complaint. 4. Ld.counsel for respondent has agreed that the both the accused i.e. accused Nos.3 & 4 ma.V be deleted from the array of the parties in the complaint case. 5. Keeping the statement of ld.counsel for respondent No.1 into view and the contention of petitioners, in the interest of justice, I hereby quash the aforesaid complaint case bearing No.12LglL pending before the Ld.Magistrate qua the accused Nos.3 & 4 namely Sh.Rama Shankar and Sh.Pramod Kr Jhunjhunwala who are the petitioners in the instant petition. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal M.C. No.755/20LI is allowed and disposed of in the above terms. 7. In view of above, Criminal M.A. No.2881l20]-]- stands disposed of as having become infructuous. 8. Needless to state that if the respondent No.1 wants to implead rest of the directors, then he can do so in accordance with law. 9. Dasti. SU 5 NP* RESH KAIT,J August LSth 20Ll evt& CRL. M.C.755/20L1 & Crl.M.A 2881/20JJ Page 2 of 2