@Clzal IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 1§5T3 OF 2008 r 5. The District Education Officer, Kawardha, Distric Kabirdham . (C.G.) WFLIT PETITIOli UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I“ ;j« T t P-ETITIONER / Smt. Vandana Khande, W/o Barsan Khande, aged about 26 years, R/o Village & Post Dharamgarh, Tahsil and District Kabirdham (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : ‘/ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, Department of Panachayat & Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Collector, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham (C.G.). x3. The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.). ‘ 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpa'd Panchayat S. Lohara, District Kabirdham (C.G.). mam m fawag‘w . ..Q.....L g 5E3 mm mm<W) mafz‘am ' mm f€ékm ' $at'mm S.B: HON‘BLE JUSTICE MR, HRIHNKER BIW'AKER L V 98-07-290E: Shri P.P. Sahu, counseif rthe petitioner. a Shri Arvind Dubey; Panel No. 1 to 3 and 5. it petition is to the order dated 29.8.2608 (Annexure P-1) pass d by the Chief Executive Officer; Janpad Panchayat; Sahaspur L hara (Respondent Ne. 4); by the order impugned the services of he petitioner; who was appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade lil; has been terminated. Challenged in the instant wyer for the State/respondents Counsei for the petitioner ubmits that though the petitioner was confirmed and regular e ployee on the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade lil but yet he has een terminated without following the due procedure of iaw and wi hout conducting any enquiry. On the other hand, couns i for the State submits that there is an alternative remedy avail ble to the petitioner by fiiing an appeai before the Collector and therefore; firs the petitioner should approach the appeiiate authority In view of the above statement, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with the liberty i to file appeai before the Coilector. He however, submits that ‘ Collector may be directed to decide the appeal independentiy without being influenced by his; any previous order. He further r t ’ XI—HC—78 ‘ my 200_ 3mm (Wu) $a'mm submits that tin the appeal is decidedg‘the petitiéhé‘i’Féza’yB allowed to perform his duties as Shiksha Karmi Grade Hi in his present place of posting. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. in the eventuaiity of filing the appeal; the same would be decided on merits by the Authorit within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of the same. Till the appeal is decided by the Collectori petiti er is allowed to perform his duties as Shiksha Karmi Grade ii i his present place of posting. it is made clear that the Co lector will decide the appeal on its merit by giving full opportu ties to the respective parties, without‘being influenced by this o er. With the above observatio s; the petition stands disposed of. Sdl- Pritinker Diwaker Judge é