IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30752 of 2010 1. BIJAY KUMAR MAHTO @ BIJLA S/O RAMU MAHTO, 2. RAMU MAHTO S/O LATE ACHHEBAT MAHTO, BOTH R/O VILLAGE- KHARMAULI, P.S. BIRPUR (BARAUNI), DISTRICT-BEGUSARAI. --PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAMNANDAN MAHTO S/O LATE SHIBU MAHTO, R/O VILLAGE-KHAJHAPUR, P.S. CHERIYA VARIYARPUR, DISTRICT-BEGUSARAI. --OPP.PARTY 2 16.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the three petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners are named accused in this complaint case carry allegation of initially taking some cash and kinds as token of marriage with his daughter but subsequently marriage was deferred and, ultimately, marriage was performed with another girl without informing the complainant. On demand, refused to return cash and kind so taken earlier. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with 2 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in Complaint Case no. 2364 ( C ) of 2007, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioners shall remain present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad