IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU WRIT PETITION No.13680 of 2006 Between: The District B.C.Mahila Welfare Association, represented by its President Bangaru Nagamani. … Petitioner And 1. The Government of A.P., represented by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development (Elections) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Chief Election Commissioner, Government of A.P., Hyderabad. 3. The Commissioner for Panchayat Raj, Hyderabad. 4. The District Collector, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda. 5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Suryapet, Nalgonda. 6. A.Prasad. 7. Y.Ratnakumar. … Respondents This Court made the following: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU WRIT PETITION No.13680 of 2006 ORDER: - (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy) This writ petition has been filed by the District B.C.Mahila Welfare Association, Nalgonda questioning the action of the respondents in not taking any steps on the representation submitted by it on 18.06.2006 as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to follow the Rule of Reservation and allot 9 Gram Panchayats as per the proportionate voters of the B.C. in Kodad Mandal, Nalgonda District. It is now represented that after rejecting the representation of the petitioner, the concerned authority passed an order on 15.07.2006 pursuant to the interim order dated 11.07.2006 and the elections were also notified and subsequently elections were conducted to various gram panchayats and thus the relief claimed in the writ petition has become infructuous. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at least in the next elections the respondents be directed to review the reservation of the 9 Gram Panchayats, which were reserved for the B.Cs. in the Kodad Mandal. The same is left open to the petitioner to assail as and when the notification is issued after completion of the term, notifying the elections to the Gram Panchayat. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ (A.GOPAL REDDY, J) ___________________________________ (SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J) 27.10.2009. Lmv