IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT MONDAY, THE 25TH AUGUST 2008 / 3RD BHADRA 1930 RPFC.No. 502 of 2007() ---------------------- MC.82/2007 OF THE FAMILY COURT, KASARGOD .................... REVISION PETITIONER/PETITIONER ----------------------------------------------- K.R.TRIVENI, AGED 30 YEARS, D/O.K.K.RAMESH, RESIDING AT NAGARAKATTE, KORAKKODU.P.O., KASARGOD. BY ADV. SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT ----------------------- RAVEENDRA, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.SEETHARAM, RESIDING AT D.NO.142H KUMPALA MOORUKATTE, KOTEKKAR, ULLAL, MANGALORE TALUK, WORKING AT CENTRAL THEATRE, HAMPANKATA, MANGALORE. BY ADV. SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN FOR R1 SRI.PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH FOR R1 SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR FOR R1 THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.F.C.No. 502 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 25th day of August, 2008 O R D E R It is represented at the Bar that practically and virtually there is no serious disputes between the parties. The revision petitioner/claimant wife is willing to resume cohabitation with the respondent/husband. But she insists that there must be an assurance that there shall be no infliction of physical or mental cruelty. Counsel for the respondent submits that he is willing to give an undertaking to that effect. The modalities will have to be worked out. The parties shall be directed to appear before the Family Court, Kasargode. The Family Court can be directed to oversee and ensure that the settlement works out. 2. As agreed by all concerned, the order passed in the revision petition is hence set aside. The parties are directed to appear before the Family Court, Kasargode on 4.9.2008. The Family Court shall ensure that the settlement between the parties R.P.F.C.No. 502 of 2007 2 is worked out. The working of the settlement shall be supervised and monitored by the Family Court. Subsequently the matter shall be disposed of. If the settlement does not work out, the Family Court shall dispose of the matter afresh after giving the parties opportunity to adduce further evidence in the matter. 3. This revision petition is accordingly allowed. The impugned order is set aside, subject to the above directions. (R. BASANT) Judge tm