IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5114 of 2009 SANJEEV KUMAR @ SANJIVA KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 15.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.. This petition for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under sections 406 and 420 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on the allegation that two cheques issued by him could not be honoured. He further submits that the actually the said cheques were given only as security but that were misused by the complainant. He also submits that to show the genuineness of his claim the complainant could not produce any bill or voucher against which those cheques could have been issued. He also avers that the petitioner is a business man and due to his rivalery he has been implicated by the complainant. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. In case of surrender/arrest within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in the court below, let the petitioner, namely, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000.00 (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sri S. M. F. Bari, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Katihar, in connection with Case No. C.A. 2516/2008. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )