IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20169 of 2009 1. NARESH YADAV @ RAM NARESH YADAV 2. Suresh Yadav Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 17.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that three accused persons namely, Ajesh Yadev, Surendra Yadav and Dinesh Kumar Yadav have been granted anticipated bail by the lower Court itself finding the allegations vague and omnibus and the petitioners are on similar footing. There is no specification but I do not agree with the learned counsel. In the first part of the alleged assault, there is vague term for causing assault. Thereafter, specification is there that one Siyaram Yadav ordered thereupon both the petitioners along with Rajesh and Siyaram Yadav brutally assaulted the deceased by means of bricks and stone. No doubt, there is land dispute between the parties but the alleged act does not entitle the petitioners for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)