IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40980 of 2008 TEJENDRA KUMAR RAJBHAR @ TEJENDRA RAJBHAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.10.2008 Heard Mr. Nil Kamal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. The petitioner is in custody in a case under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that the informant was uprooting garlic plants when the petitioner came and made enquiry about the reasons for uprooting the plants and on being told that as the lady had planted the same, she was doing it, the petitioner gave repeated blows with spade on her. It appears that there were three injuries found by the doctor who initially attended on her while the doctor of the P.M.C.H. reported four injuries. Seriousness of the injuries could be gathered from the fact that the first incised wound on the mid of back below neck was up to cavity deep and the second incised wound on forehead was found having caused sutunal fracture of parieto occipital sature. The petition is dismissed. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )