^ mTHE^KiHCOUj?r_QFLCHHArnSGARHiiyiASPUR Wnt Petition No, 4043 of 2003 Petitioner Bhg^wati. Prasad Sbarma, S/o Shri Maagal Prasad Sharma, Aged- about 61 years, Occupation - Teacher, R/o Thankhamriya, Ward No. 2 Police Station & Sub tahsa Khamariya, District Dux^ (Chliattisgarii) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Thiough the Prmcipal Secretaiy, Departinent of En.vironineut & Urbaa Developiaent, Maatt-alaya, D.K.S. Bhawau, Mantealaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarb) 2, Nagar Pauchayat, Througli Chief Mimicipal Officer, Thaa - Khamriya, District Durg (Chxia.ttisgarh) WRIT P&TITON UNDER AK'riCLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: HonTile Shri SatKh K. AgnihotriJ.) Shri Anaad Kuinar Tiwan, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A. S. Kachwah.a, Depuly Advocate General for fhe respoudent No. 1. O R DER (Passed on this 16th day of October, 2008) 1. Leanied coiuisel appearmg for the petitiouer subinits that ia view of tbe averments m.ad.e bv the respondent No.l ia para«raphs 3 aud 4 of ftie retum dated 29.9.2008, that the Sulabfa Sauchalaya has alreacly been constructed at other place, not on fhe petition schedule laud, nothmg survives in t&is petition. He furtber submits that tbe pctitioner inay be permitted to withdraw fhis petition. ~z <. 2. 3. Thalmr Leamed counsel appearing for the respondent/State has no objection. In view of the above, the petition is disinissed as wlttidrawn, as haviag becoine inlructuous. Consequenfty, M(W)P No. 3624/2003 aud oftier pendiug appUcations are also disinNsed. SdA SatlshK.Agraiwri