1-1 ^•M^ ^^"" aEBffig^te'-lWSt e^f- • i^^/^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR RESPONDENT WRIT PETITION (S) N0. l%'33 OF 2010 fSmt. Krishna Yadav aged about 46 years, wd/o K.L. Yadav, R/o near Chandramauli Mandir, Bandhwapara, Sarkanda, Tahsil SE District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS /•• 1. Union of India, through - the Secretary, Department of Finance and Banking, Union of India, New Delhi. 2. The General Manager, Zonal Office Gangotri Complex, 1" Floor, T.T. Nagar, Bhadbhada Road, Bhopal (M.P.) 3. The Regional Manager, Regional Office, Union Bank of India, Mahavir Ghoshala Complex, Maudhapara, Raipur (C.G.). 4. The Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, PodUafa (Pali), Korba (C.G.). 5. Assistant General Manager, Central Office, Union Bank Bhavan, Union Bank of India, 239, Vidhan Bhavan Marg, Mumbai (M.S.) 400021. WRIT PETITION VNDER ARTICLE 226 QF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE LIKE NATURE. 1] PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER:- As given above in the cause title. 2] PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENT: As given above in the cause title. E:S l!";'i; ^'li ^ ' St HIGH COURT OF CHMATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRiT PETtTIQN (S) N0.1233 Of^OIO Smt. Krishna Yadav Versus Union of tndia & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiat Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnlhotri, J. Present - Shri Rahui Birtharey, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Fouzia Mifza, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Shri Abhijit C. Thakur and Shri Varun Mishra, Advocate for the resspondents No.2 to 5. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed onti:iis4*dayofMareh, 2011) 1 1. Leamed counset appearing for the petitioner submits that the ordsr dated 04/12/2009 (Annexure P/2) passed by this Court in W.P.No. 424/2005 (Smt. Krishna Yadav v. Unton oftndta & OVhws}, was not comptied with in its letor and spirit. The petltioner has fited a contempt petition being (PR) No. 843/2010 and wlthdrew ttie same on the ground that the she did not have the knowiedge about name of the Generat Manager, Zonal Office Gangotri Complex, 1 Floor T.T. Nagar, Bhadbhada Road, Bhopat (M.P.), who has passed the order. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank has supplied the name of the General Manager to the petitioner in the Court itself. 3. Accordingly, the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to approprirte forum, if so advised. 4. No objection from otherskie. 5. tt isordered. as oraved for. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as withdrawn wrth the above-stated observation. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge Arun