IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4836 of 2010 Date of decision: January 20, 2011 Sonia Malik .. Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Babbar Bhan, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate for the respondent No.3. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 30.5.2009 passed by the trial court dismissing the application filed by the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. The petitioner is the wife of Ram Phal, who died in an accident. The plaintiff Jitender Lather has set up the plea that he was a licencee but the authorities found that he was not having a valid licence and issued show cause notice for cancellation of the said licence. Now the plaintiff Jitender Lather has filed a suit challenging the said show cause notice. However, this is dispute between the licensor or the licencee and the petitioner has nothing to do with the said licence as criminal case is already pending against the plaintiff for his rashness and negligence. As regards the civil liability, the compensation has already been awarded to the petitioner, as such, the petitioner being not necessary party was rightly not impleaded as party by the trial court. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. January 20, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge