IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.27248 of 2008 SHASHWAT BHARDWAZ VRS. THE STATE OF BIHAR **** /3/ 11.08.2008 As per the direction of this Court, petitioner as well as the informant are present. Allegations and counter allegations are made which only shows that none of them are willing to live with each other. So far the allegation of torture and demand of dowry is concerned, I find that marriage was solemnized on 01.03.2008. The complaint case has been instituted in haste without giving any time to understand each other. The petitioner has also shown his haste. He did not even wait for statutory period for filing a divorce petition. 2. Considering this situation, I find that just sending the petitioner to jail is not going to solve the problem. It will make the chances of reconciliation more bleak. 3. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner, Shashwat Bhardwaz, is allowed. He is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case of his surrender before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 177 of 2008 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )