1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.455 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.224 OF 2010 Mohd. Firoz Mohd. Mustaq Mohd. Bhanjaya ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ----- Mr.M.S. Singh for Applicant Mr.S.R.Shinde - APP for State ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 29TH APRIL, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant and the Learned APP for the State. 2. The Applicant is convicted by the Trial Court for the offence punishable under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer R.I. for three years and to pay fine of Rs.200/- and in default, to suffer further S.I. for three months. 3. The learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant has already undergone more than two 2 years of the actual sentence. 4. The learned APP, however, has submitted that the Applicant has been convicted in 10 criminal cases. He submitted that this is not a fit case for grant of bail. 5. Taking into consideration the criminal antecedents of the Applicant, the application for bail is rejected. Appeal is, however, fixed for final hearing on 14th June, 2010. If the appeal is not heard within a period of one month, the Applicant may revive application for bail. 6. In view of the order passed in criminal application No.455 of 2010, criminal application No. 132 of 2010 does not survive and disposed of. Leave to amend in cause title of the appeal memo is granted. (V.M. KANADE J.)