IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DECEMBER 2009 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 RP.No. 1207 of 2009() --------------------- (RCR NO.180 OF 2009) REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. P. KUNHAMU 2. P. ABOOBACKER, BOTH ARE CHILDREN OF ANDU MUSALIYAR, RESIDING AT PERUVAD HOUSE, KOIPADY, KOIPADY VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, P.O. KUMBALA. BY ADV. SRI.K.G.GOURI SANKAR RAI RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. KUNHIBI 2. ABBAS 3. HASSAN 4. FATHIMA 5. ZOURA 6. JAMEELA, R. NO.1 WIDOW AND NOS.2 AND 4 ARE CHILDREN OF LATE MAMMUNHI @ MAMMU, ALL ARE RESIDING AT MOGRAL IN MOGRALA VILLAGE AND POST, KASARAGOD TALUK. ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------ R.P..No. 1207 of 2009 in R.C.R. No.180 of 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 16th day of December, 2009 O R D E R Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Delete the name of Sri.M.Sasindran from the cause list and also from the copy of the order in the review petition. 2. The review petitioners seek review of our judgment for the limited purpose of correcting a patent mistake. Having heard the submissions of Sri.K.G.Gowrishankar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner, we are of the view that since what is sought to be corrected is only a patent clerical mistake, the review can be granted even without issuing notice to the respondents. Accordingly, we allow the Review Petition and substitute the figure Rs.1,55,520/- in the penultimate paragraph of our judgment by the figure Rs.2,13,120/-. The Review Petition is allowed to the above extent. In all other respects our judgment will stand confirmed. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE dpk