1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3064 of 2009 (Annasaheb s/o Nayabrao Padul and others vs. The State) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.J.Salunke, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. V.D.Godbharle, APP, for respondent/State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 18/9/2009 P.C.:- 1. In Crime No.I-43/2009, registered at Maujpuri Police Station, the accused/applicants, who are in custody from 25th May, 2009, seeks bail. 2. Having gone through the statements of the witnesses, namely, son of the deceased, the land holder Nalegaonkar, I find specific role to accused Vishnu and Ganesh with sticks and agricultural implements assaulted deceased Datta, however, 2 accused/applicant Annasaheb, Janardhan, Prabhakar are seen to give fist blows to said Datta. There is no other overt act attributed to the accused. Though it is a matter of record that these 7/8 persons were assaulting Datta, however, since chargesheet is filed, considering respective ages of these three accused/applicants, they deserve bail. Hence order: ORDER (a) The bail application for applicant nos. (3) Vishnu Annasaheb Padul, (4) Ganesh s/o Trimbak Padul is rejected. (b) Application of applicant nos. (1) Annasaheb s/o Nayabrao Padul, (2) Prabhakar s/o. Annasaheb Padul, (5) Janardhan s/o Ganesh Padul is allowed. Each one of them be released on each furnishing P.R. bond and surety in the sum of Rs.20,000/-. (c) After release, these accused 3 shall attend the investigator on every Sunday between 5 to 7 p.m. till completion of trial. d) The accused/applicants will not influence the eye witnesses and particularly son of the deceased, the landlord, Nalegaonkar and others associated with the case. Application disposed of in above terms. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/3064-09crapl