IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19843 of 2008 MD. ABBAS & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.08.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused for offence registered under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420 120(B) of the Indian Penal code and 13(1) (D) P.C. Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in nutshell, the case is to the effect that the whole dispute is civil dispute between the parties and civil suit is also pending between them. It is further submitted that some of the co-accused have been allowed regular bail and one of the co-accused has been allowed anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State (Vigilance) on the other hand, submits that these two petitioners fraudulently got executed and registered a power of attorney at Mumbai by presenting two lady impersonating the original owner of the land under the said power of attorney. The petitioners on the basis of the said forged document deed of sales were executed and registered at Muzaffarpur in the name of some of the accused persons. It is further submitted that the petitioners are absconding on knowing the proceeding of the case in which charge sheet has already been submitted against them, as such , petitioners are not entitled to anticipatory bail as prayed for. Considering the serious nature of allegations against these two petitioners and the materials brought on record, I am not inclined - 2 - to allow the anticipatory application for bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the same is rejected. On surrender in the court below and in case files an application for bail, the same would be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)