IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 1638 of 2010. Date of Decision : February 02, 2010. M/s B.C.H. Electric Ltd., Faridabad . ...... Petitioner. Versus. The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-II, Faridabad, and another ..... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH. Present:- Mr. Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate, with, Mr. Puneet Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL). Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner be granted liberty to move an appropriate application under Section 18 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, (for short “the Act”). He further contends that in the light of the application for review preferred by the petitioner, which has been dismissed by the Court below, vide order dated 01.12.2009, the same may not be treated as an impediment for entertaining an application by the petitioner under Section 18 of the Act. Prayer made by counsel for the petitioner is accepted. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to move an appropriate application before the Tribunal, if so advised, under Section 18 of the Act. The order dated 01.12.2009 shall not be an impediment for entertaining an application, if so moved by the petitioner and decision thereon on merits. The present petition stands disposed of with liberty aforesaid. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE February 02, 2010. sjks.