CRM M No.9653 of 2011 (O&M) Ranjit Singh @ Jit Singh V/s State of Haryana Present: Mr.I.P.S.Kohli, Advocate for Mr.R.K.Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Manmohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana. ***** AJAY TEWARI, J.(ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.14 dated 23.01.2011 registered under Sections 406 and 420 IPC at Police Station Pinjore. On 30.03.2011, the following contention was noticed: - “Learned counsel has argued that pursuant to the agreement to sell executed in favour of the complainant the petitioner had executed a sale deed dated 31.01.2006 but now the complainant is seeking to usurp land which was never part of the agreement to sell and that the transaction is six years old.” Learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana on instructions from ASI Jaswinder Singh has accepted the factual assertion that pursuant to an agreement to sell executed in favour of the complainant, the petitioner had executed a sale dated 31.01.2006 and that a civil suit in regard to this dispute is also pending. Though he had denied the argument that the complainant is seeking to usurp the land which was never part of the agreement to sell. Be that as it may, in these circumstances, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. CRM M No.11025 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Ordered accordingly. In the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating Officer subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. 12.05.2011 [AJAY TEWARI] shamsher JUDGE