IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND DECEMBER 2011 / 1ST POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 34596 of 2011(Y) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. JASEELA ALI PARAYIL, AGED 21 YEARS, NISSAS (H), KOLLAGAPPARA P.O., SULTHAN BATHERY, WAYANAD-673 592. 2. JYOTHISHA PAUL, AGED 21 YEARS, KIZHUCHIRA (H), KOLAKKAD P.O., PERAVOOR (VIA), KANNUR-670 673. 3. ANUPAMA MURALIDHARAN, AGED 21 YEARS, ANASWARA (H), NEAR MUNICIPAL PARK, EDODI, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE-673 101. 4. ANEESH A.P., AGED 20 YEARS, ANAPARAKKAL HOUSE, MANIPURAM P.O., KODUVALLI (VIA), KOZHIKODE-673 584. BY ADV. SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, THENJIPALAM P.O., MALAPPURAM. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF EDUCATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJIPALAM P.O., MALAPPURAM. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT. BY ADV. MR.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/12/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 34596 of 2011(Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 06/12/2011. EXT.P2 COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 09/12/2011. EXT.P3 COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF THE 3RD PETITIONER DATED 09/12/2011. EXT.P4 COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF THE 4TH PETITIONER DATED 12/12/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).34596/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of one paper of the B.Tech Electronics and Communication Engineering Examination vide Exts.P1 to P4 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs