\^0 T^T ^i^i^^, ^Til-M^Ko, f®idi'(-i^< Wl P - C^^) H o. ^-^ojy©g ^i^r T?^.(^?^^)' ^i^l^T'^fe WT^?^l^^1^ i^f^: ^t^ 3?l^T PETITIONBR Divisioijiai Mmiager, tiie Oriental AAtt^^L/A'1 Insuraricc Co/ Ltd, near to Bus Versiss Staiid pilaspm-, Tali. Aiid Distt BilaspL^r (CG) RBSPONDENTS l. Shivnajj-ayan S/o lat 2. Lagani ShnivnaiTayaii Driye? QWNER Both ifs Post Biji Korba {( Presen^ Tali. 8sj 3, Santos] age ab4 VishVVi Masniy^., Korba 12 ZB/[ 4, Kumurld P^?arelajl Hotel, Korba (K (Ov>,Tnerj AB/02^ WR!T PETITION UNDSR ARf Dhirendra Mishra. J. <^(^?^l41^ ^W^t ^ f^^> ipsj^K ^3^H3ii^r Singh, age 45 yem's, ^ Anjor Singh Bai aged 43 yeai-s, w/o Singh '^sident of village Bhanwai', njhara, Tah. Katghora, distt. FG]address- vUlage Akaltari, pistt. Buaspur (CG) {i @ Balaraai Vishwaisarma, )ut 35 years, S/'o Aiiiol Say, i^arma, resident of viUage T'hana Katghora, Distt. i|CG) (Drivcr ofvchiclc No. CG p294) Saliu, age Years^ S/o Sahu, resident of Murli [Bus Stand Katghora, Distt. ^G) of vehicle No. CG 12 ?4) E1CLB 227 OF THE CONSTITUTEOK 0F iDNA uRA^ OHDER -5-2008 ^^f^ ^r^ ^uii^, <t^i^ii4 —FS/i97—3/2008—40,000. sn^r^T'f^w ^T^TT^T^^te ^^ ^^"Mi^Kn^, ^y4i<o, f^<ni'>-i;j,< -^........^..£:...C^lZldo.^or^o<s 'W^TiRllW """"""" """""^200 ^I^T ^^ (^3^T) 1'^TOT ^ltef ^TS^T Shri Sudhii' Agrawal, This petition is direcfed against the order dated 5-4-2008 of Annexm'e P-1 wherebv Claiiiis Tribunal, Bilaspu petitioner for adjouniing Claims Tribunal at Korba. Leamed couiisel fo Insurance polic^7 issued to regard were filed before tj arisuig out of the same ac^ cbl^id^t'l 'WT^f ^ ^S <F3lt^K ^ ^tRpqr a?nt?r Advocate, for the petitioner. learned Additional Motor Accident |r, has reiected ttie prayer of the plie case to enable hml to prove the documents which have be^n filed ui another claini case arising out of the saine accident p^uding in the Court of Motor Accideut r the petitioner submits that the me respondent No. 4 was cancelled aiid tlie owner was intiin^ted about canceUation of the policy well in advmice as the ch^que towai'ds premiura submitted by the owner bounced, how^ver the original documents in this tie Clajins Tribmial in a ciaim case cident aiid, therefore, they could not be produced on the date w|ien the matter was uxed for evidence of Insuraiice companyj and in these circuiiistances, adjourniiient was prayed }for vide Aiinexure P-5, However the sanie was rejected by thejimpugned order on the ground that the petitioner has not giv^i tlie case nuiiiber of me claim case at Korba. 9JW^T ^r^T^II^, <M^i^)jc< —[.-S/197—3/2008 —40,000. XI-HC—78 3^?T ^\ RTliob WT ^^ 9b*lict) y' *11*1Cf11 W*11<»» TST r^l<4ld^, ©Ti1-(-i<i(o, fs|dl'y;j,< to. ^70r/&^ ^200 ^TT^T '(7^F (lq^q<i^) '^<TTW?rf^T 3?nr^T affdrded consid^ration Leamed counsel for| is fixed for fmal argmiien| the petitioner niay be evidence m the interest of| Taking into petitioner for adjoui'miierj beiow was not justifle^ adjournment and the petl opportunity to adduce evi^ In these circmiistar^ dated 5-4-2008 of Annext remitted to the concerne^ afford tlie petitioner last| the month ofjune, 2008 | yuice mis orcler is] respondents, the respon^ approach this Court for petltioner <=Mci(<n<fli 'RPToft ^ fe^?)' <pai<^i< i73tfim3TT^T the petitioner submits mat the matter L on 17-6-200S. He further prays that a last opportunity to adduce his Liustice. the reasons assigned by the it, I ain of the opinion tliat tiie Court 1 in rejecting the applicatk)n for ought to have been afforded an ^ence in support of this case. ^es, the petition is allowed. T'he order |ire P-1 is set aside aiid the matter is i Claims Tribimal with a du'ection to opportunity of adducing eviclence in tsetf. being passed without notice to the |ents, if aggrieved by Uiis order, may relief. - - stitable Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge