*1* ss.778.09 kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.778 OF 2009 Ambalal R. Jain. ..Plaintiff -Versus- Prakash S. Mulik and another. ..Defendant .......... Ramesh Jain, for the Plaintiff. .......... CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 29th October, 2010. P.C. 1 The suit is on bill of exchange. For valuable consideration the bill of exchange was drawn, duly accepted and delivered. On presentation it was dishonoured, therefore, the demand notice was sent on 26.07.2008. 2 The instant summary suit is filed in this Court on 25.03.2009 and bearing in mind that the bill was presented on 02.04.2006, the suit claim is within limitation. Leave under clause-12 of the Letters Patent being granted, the Plaintiff prays that the decree be passed against the Defendants who are duly served. 3 It is stated that though the notice was received by the Defendants, there is no dispute or denial of liability. In such circumstances and when the Court has territorial jurisdiction to entertain and try the suit and no part of the Plaintiff’s claim is barred by limitation, so also, it is clearly falling under Order XXXVII of the Civil Procedure Code, the suit is decreed as prayed. 4 The affidavit proving the service is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The original documents are taken on record *2* ss.778.09 and marked “X-1” for identification. 5 In such circumstances, the suit is decreed as prayed. The Advocate’s costs be computed as per rules. Refund of the Court fees as per rules. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)