RSA No. 2661 of 2009 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 2661 of 2009 Date of Decision: 17.7.2009 The Sub Divisional Officer and others ......Appellants Versus Ashok Kumar .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Sudhir Kumar Hooda, Advocate, for the appellants. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral). The defendants are in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the learned first Appellate Court, granting compensation of Rs.3 lacs on account of injuries suffered by the plaintiff in an accident on account of high tension wires across the roof of the house of the plaintiff. The learned trial Court has granted compensation of Rs.1 lac, but in appeal, the same has been enhanced to Rs.3 lacs. Both the Courts have recorded a concurrent finding of fact that the accident occurred on account of the negligent handling of the high tension wires. Such finding is a possible finding based on evidence. It could not be pointed out that any evidence has been misread or not taken into consideration. RSA No. 2661 of 2009 (2) Consequently, I do not find any patent illegality or material irregularity in the finding recorded or that the finding recorded gives rise to any substantial question of law in the present second appeal. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 17-07-2009 ds