c.§,l0°’/ 3 N THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGA AT BILASP_uR (c.G.) w.P. (c; No. éZS‘B of 2011 x WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF T SONSTITUTION QF INDIA I RH HE PETITIONER /’ Mukesh Tiwari, aged about w“. years, S/o Late R.S.Tiwari, \w\76{a Maa Sharda Traves, n Pand'R' n mowiyw a” .-" ...... 'n .. "V ...... (QG‘) “wig?............ r i0 { M1 w" \ VERsus RESPONDENT : ’ Regiona! Transport Authority, Raipur (C.G.) HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I'I‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 6259 of2011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present: Shri Santosh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.KBhadun', Panel Lawyer for the State. (Passed on soIOdgEfIIv§vembeg 2011) The gievance of the petitioner is that on 25.052011 (Annexure P/l): the petitioner moved an application before the respondent for grant of regular stage caniage permit on the route Raipur to Chhura via Rajim, Gariyaband, Parsuli and return single tn'p daily. However, till date, the same has not been decided by the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide the said application expeditiously. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the application of the petitioner shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period of four weeks form the date ofreceipt of a copy ofthis order. 4. In View of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide the application dated 25.052011 (Annexure P/l) filed by the petitioner, within a period of four weeks dom the date ofreceipt of a copy ofthis order. Sdl- SATISH K. ANGNH-IOTRI Judge Gown PETITIONER : Mukesh Tiwari. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Regional Transport Authority, Raipur.