IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3175 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.R.TRIPATHI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- GA SAIYED Versus DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR YN OZA for Petitioner MR DIGAN JOSHI for MR SP HASURKAR for Respondent No. 1, 4 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 2 MR DA BAMBHANIA for Respondent No. 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.R.TRIPATHI Date of decision: 16/03/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT #. Mr.Y.N.Oza, learned advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Digant Joshi, learned A.G.P. for Mr.Hasurkar, for respondent State. #. In this particular matter this court passed an order on 14.7.88 directing the respondent to pay the amount of gratuity dues to the petitioner with 12% interest from the date of retirement and also determine the amount of commuted pension payable to the petitioner within three months from today and after determination of the said amount, the said amount be paid with 12% interest from the date of the order to the petitioner. Mr.Joshi, places on record a letter dtd.16.1.98, wherein it is specifically mentioned that the gratuity and commuted pension is paid with 12% interest amounting to Rs.40,207/-. Copy of the letter is taken on record. Mr.Joshi also places on record a letter dtd.19.2.94 issued from the office of Director of Pension & Provident Fund, Gujarat State. Both these letters are taken on record. Mr.Joshi has also placed on record a letter dtd.22/23-8-1994 wherein it is mentioned that after the departmental inquiry which is pending against the petitioner comes to be finalised, the final pension of the petitioner will be fixed. In view of these three letters placed on record no grievance survives. Petition stands disposed of. Rule made absolute with no order as to costs. kks