AB 1755/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. MERUNO g for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.S. Sinha, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor , Assam. After hearing the learned counsel, this Court passed an interim order, wherein i t was directed that the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the case. When the Court asked the learned counsel whether the petitioner ha s complied with the direction of this Court by appearing before the I/O within t he time stipulated, the learned counsel submits that he needs further time to re ceive instruction. When the order has been passed by this Court, it is duty boun d that the same is complied with because the liberty was granted to the petition er on condition that he shall appear before the I/O. The learned counsel should have updated information as to whether the order of this Court has been complied with and not make submission that he has no instruction. Such submission cannot be accepted by this Court since the learned Addl. P.P. also submits that no com pliance report has been furnished to him. Considering this aspect of the matter, when the liberty granted by this Court has been abused and also the order passe d by this Court has not been complied with, no mercy should be shown to such per son. In this view of the matter, the interim bail granted on 22.7.2011 is hereby reca lled and this bail application stands rejected.