IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1690 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:10.03.2011. Ajit Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus Baljinder Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This revision is directed against the order dated 22.02.2011 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Ludhiana by which the application filed by the petitioners for de-exhibiting the rent receipts Ex.R1 to R11 and declaring the evidence of RW4 Jaswant Singh to that extent inadmissible and irrelevant, has been dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that the rent receipts Ex.R1 to R11 have been tendered by RW4 Jaswant Singh stating that Avtar Singh, who had executed the rent receipts, is dead but no evidence has been brought on record to prove the death of Avtar Singh. He also submits that RW4 Jaswant Singh has not proved as to how he knew Avtar Singh, therefore, mere marking of a document does not dispense the proof. He also submitted that the rent receipts Ex.R1 to R11 are forged and fabricated. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the available record. The learned Rent Controller, while dismissing the application, has observed that the petitioners would have the opportunity to cross-examine RW4 Jaswant Singh by which they could testify his veracity and the genuineness of the said rent receipts shall be taken into consideration at the time of decision of the case on merits. To my mind, the observation of the learned Rent Controller is perfectly in order and is in accordance with law which does not require any interference by this Court. Hence, the present revision petition is hereby dismissed in limine, however, without any order as to costs. March 10, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE