IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 6959 of 2010 Date of decision: October 26, 2010 Kanwar Pal ...Petitioner Versus Jaggi and others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. Naveen Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. GURDEV SINGH, J. Heard. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by Kanwar Pal-petitioner/defendant No.2 against the order dated 14.10.2010, vide which his evidence was closed by order by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Nuh. A perusal of the order shows that the adjournment was granted to him, subject to the costs, which were never paid on the date fixed. The trial court was very much justified in closing the evidence on account of non payment of costs. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner himself that five opportunities were granted to the petitioner to produce his evidence. When such is the position, no ground is made out for interference with the order so passed by the trial court. Revision petition is dismissed accordingly. October 26, 2010 (GURDEV SINGH ) prem JUDGE