FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2744 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO. 2744 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO. 2744 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1466 OF 200 PETITION NO. 1466 OF 200 PETITION NO. 1466 OF 2002 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Dilip Bodake for the petitioner. Shri C.R.Sonawane AGP for State. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & SMT. SMT. SMT. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. DTAED: DTAED: DTAED: 25TH APRIL,2006 25TH APRIL,2006 25TH APRIL,2006. P.C. In In In C.A. NO.2744 OF 2004. C.A. NO.2744 OF 2004. C.A. NO.2744 OF 2004. 1. Heard Shri Bodake for the petitioner and Shri Sonawane for the Respondent. 2. For reasons mentioned in Civil Application, application is allowed. The petition is restored to file. Civil Application accordingly disposed of. In In In W.P. NO.1466 OF 2002 W.P. NO.1466 OF 2002 W.P. NO.1466 OF 2002 By consent of parties, taken up for argument. 3. Heard both the sides. Perused the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. According to the submissions made by Shri Bodake, the order is not legal and valid. A perusal of the order will show that there is no substance in this submission. The Tribunal had not committed any jurisdictional error. The findings of the Tribunal have based on facts and in law. Consequently no interference is possible. Hence petition dismissed. ...