IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2851 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ BABUBHAI CHIKABHAI PARMAR Versus MANAGING DIRECTOR- GUJARAT AGRO INDUSTRIES CORPO. LTD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 2851 of 1998 MR VM DHOTRE for Petitioner No. 1 MS PJ DAVAWALA for Respondent No. 1 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 2-3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD Date of decision: 03/05/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT Heard learned advocate Mr.Dhotre for the petitioner and Ms. Davawala, learned advocate for the respondents. In this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order of suspension and transfer.Today, when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned advocate Mr. Dhotre has submitted that in view of the suspension, departmental inquiry has been initiated against the petitioner and, thereafter, an order of dismissal has been passed. That order was challenged by the petitioner before this Court and ultimately, it was directed by this court to file appeal before the appellate authority of the department and then the petitioner approached the appellate authority of the department wherein, ultimately, order of dismissal has been converted into an order of termination and, therefore, in view of these subsequent developments, this petition has become infructuous and is required to be disposed of as such. In view of the statement made by Mr.Dhotre, this petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged. Interim relief, if any, shall stand vacated with no order as to costs. 3.5.2002. (H.K. Rathod,J.) Vyas