IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 267 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 267 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 267 OF 2006 Pranlal Bhogilal. ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. Dena Bank and 4 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. Nitin G. Thakkar, senior counsel with Mr. Behram Kamdin and Mr. G.S. Manawala for the petitioner. Mrs. Mohana Nair for the respondents No.1 and 2. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 06TH MARCH, 2006 P.C. : . Considering the impugned order, we do not find that it suffers from any error apparent. If the respondents do not produce the accounts, it will be for the Tribunal to decide whether the respondents herein have proved their case or not. Apart from that, liberty has been granted to the petitioners to cross-examine the witnesses to be produced by the respondent. Considering the above, no interference is called for. Petition disposed of. : 2 : 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that on 6th February, 2006 time to file the Written Statement was extended upto 15th June, 2006. It will be open to the petitioners to file Written Statement by that date. Needless to say, all questions are left open. Sd/- [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]