^n^.a^n^'. ^ . \o6 L^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER ^^ ^%^ 'y>'- ...--^1 -2. Writ Petition (S) N0. '^S^Q /2011 Kholbahara Rathore S/o Late Shri Banshi Lal Rathore, aged about 58 years Working as Assistant Grade II, Municipal Council Janjgir-Naila, R/o Ward No.12, Janjgir, Chitarpara, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) RESPONDENTS ^ VERSUS 1) State of Chhattisgarh through Secretaiy Urban Administration and Development Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) ^2) The Commissioner, Urban Administration and Development Department Raipur (C.G.) ^3) The Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council Janjgir-Naila, District Janjgir-CKampa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF LNDIA ^^^T^rr^r •<rqT 3^ %TfR,- ^^ *ll*(CTl (b^l^ 'TST ^i^K'i'q, yTi1'l-i<i<s, [®ldiy^< (&^) 1^.0 -~^&^^>1 1} ^ 200 ^TI^T ''T^T ('^^f^ST^T^ 1F^TW ^f^T 3TT^T SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra M 05-12-2011 Shri Vinod Deshmukh, coi Shri Arun Sao, Governm< j|nsel for the petitioner. ?|nt Advocate for the State / respondents 1 and 2 on advance copy. This petition has been fiie 5/8/2011 by which the petitioner - Naiia to Municipal Council, Bair Learned counsei for the employee of the locai body and body to other iocal body though ^ by the petitioner aggrieved by transfer order dated |ias been transferred from Municipal Coundl, Janjgjr ampur. Ipetitioner submits that the petitioner is a low paid ! the petitioner has been transferred from one iocai jiere is no compiaint against the petitioner and he has oniy 18 months to retire. Learne^ has made representation to the Qommissioner. Learned State counsei s( transfer an employee of the loca|l the Chhattisgarh Municipaiities A): The petitioner is a low p^i has been posted in Municipal Ccji the fag end of his career. The tr^ representationin its proper persl with a direction to respondent N(j>. take decjslon on the same, in ac^ within a period offour weete fror|n Tiil that period, the petiti(j)r order of transfer and no coercit< ground that he has been relievecp. ^m^. ^ fepfhT 'R71:T^ff ^f f^^ <Fst^l< "^ 3tRfH 3T?^?T han Shrivastava. J. counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner jbmits that the State Government is empowered to body in exercise of powers under Section 94 (7) of ;t. 1961. id employee and through out his service career, he incil, Janjgir - NaJia now, he has been transferred at nsferring authority is therefore obtiged to consider his )ective. Therefore, the petifion is finally disposed off .1 to consider the representation of the petitioner and (ordance with law. Necessary decision shali be taken the date of recejpt of copy of this order. ler shall not be disturbed pursuant to the impugned steps shaii be taken against the petitioner on the -^, U^Rr^T^—3-S/i40—2/2011—1,50,000. Sd/- ManindraMohanShrivastava Judge