IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-16678 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: May 27, 2011 Arvind Kumar …..Petitioner versus State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for Mr.Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate for the petitioner .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) This is a petition under section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail in a case registered against the petitioner under section 392 IPC and section 25/54/59 of the Arms Act vide FIR No.28 dated 8.2.2008 at police station Tauru, District Mewat. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that name of the petitioner does not figure in the FIR. He has been falsely implicated in the case and thus, deserves the concession of pre-arrest bail. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. A bank robbery took place on 8.2.2008 at 10.45 A.M. in the Kalwari branch of Gurgaon Gramin Bank. Four boys having revolvers in their hands committed the offence. Cash amounting to Rs.2,40,770/- was looted in the robbery. Name of the petitioner figured in the disclosure statement of two co-accused Parkash @ Jagat and Maman Singh. The Crl.Misc.No.M-16678 of 2011 - 2 - petitioner remained absconding. As a result, proclamation proceedings started against him. In view of nature of allegations and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered view that petitioner is not entitled to concession of pre-arrest bail. The petition is devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed. May 27, 2011 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE 2