1 cri appln 328.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 328 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 28 OF 2011 Ismail Gayasoddin Shaikh .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri B. R. Warma, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri V. G. Shelke, A.P.P. for the Respondent/State. CORAM : S. S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 31ST JANUARY, 2011. PER COURT : . Heard. Issue notice. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice for the respondent/State. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant/appellant submits that, the suspension of sentence was ordered subject to deposit of fine amount by the applicant/appellant. However, the applicant/appellant could not deposit the said amount. 2 cri appln 328.11 Therefore, he is not released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant on instructions from his client makes statement that within two weeks he will deposit the fine amount before the Trial Court. 3. The learned counsel further prays that, the applicant/appellant may be released on bail upon depositing the fine amount before the Trial Court. The applicant be released on bail upon depositing entire fine amount as ordered by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge – 1, Dhule in its impugned judgment and order dated 19.01.2011. Application stands disposed of. [S. S. SHINDE, J.] bsb/Jan. 11