1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No.678 of 2008 (Kaushal @ Kaushalyabai w/o Vishnu Dahatonde and others v. State of Maharashtra and another) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shri N.B. Kalwaghe, Advocate for Applicants. Smt. A.R. Taywade, APP for Respondent No.1. Shri D.B. Walthare, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : R.C. Chavan, J. DATE : 8th October, 2008 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code for quashing of the investigation initiated vide Crime No.4 of 2008 registered in Police Station Lonar. The learned counsel for the applicants states that he would withdraw the application and seek appropriate reliefs after the investigation is complete. He, however, apprehends that the applicants will be subjected to unwarranted custodial interrogation. Both the learned counsel for the original complainant as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor state that this apprehension is thoroughly unwarranted. The offence took place on 16-1-2008, the investigation has made substantial progress, and because of the interim orders passed by this Court, the investigation has not been completed. 2 In view of this, since the learned Magistrate before whom the applicants may be produced, if arrested, would decide the application of the applicants for bail on the same day, this apprehension is unfounded. Hence, the application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to take necessary recourse to such remedies at appropriate stage of the proceedings. Interim orders stand vacated. JUDGE Lanjewar