IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2126 of 2005 GANESH RAI Versus GAUTAM RAI & ORS ----------- 14 30/9/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the amendment allowed by the court below by the impugned order, does not suffer from any jurisdictional error, in as much as, plot no. 655, khata no. 24 is sought to be replaced by plot no. 955, khata no. 95. In the opinion of this Court such amendment would not change nature of the suit and considering the fact that the defendant, petitioner has already staked his claim to the plot in question in his written statement, the court below will definitely go into that question in course of hearing of the suit. That being so, this Court would not find any merit in this application which is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner may have liberty to file his additional written statement confined to only amendment made in the plaint by the impugned order and that too within a period of one month from 2 the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar