IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.3620 of 2009 Date of decision: 29.11.2010 Punna Devi & others ......Appellant(s) Versus Smt. Kaulan & others ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. R.S. Manhas, Advocate for respondent No.6. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) After hearing learned counsel for the parties, it appears that there is no possibility of amicable settlement. Notice of motion was issued only to the aforesaid limited extent. In the suit for possession, the plaintiff-appellants had sought possession of the suit land on the basis of sale deed dated 13.2.1962 alleged to be executed by defendant No.1 in their favour and alternatively they had sought declaration of their title in the suit property on the plea of adverse possession. However, the Courts below have found that the appellants were unable to prove their title over the suit property on the basis of the aforesaid sale deed in question. It may also be noticed at this stage that suit for declaration of title on the basis of adverse possession is not maintainable. In this view of the matter, I find no merit in this appeal, No substantial question of law arises. Dismissed. November 29, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE