Crl. Misc.No.M 23928 of 2010 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc.No.M 23928 of 2010 Date of Decision:-28.10.2010 Smt. Anita & Ors. ......Petitioners. Versus State of Haryana & Ors. ......Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH. Present:- Mr. S.P. Chahar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. M.S. Sindhu, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. *** JASWANT SINGH, J(ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.PC is to direct the police authorities to take appropriate steps to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private persons who are allegedly interfering in their married life. It is alleged that respectables of Gotra of petitioner no.1- wife are against her marriage with petitioner no.2, who also belongs to the same area but to a different Gotra. It is submitted that petitioners along with family members of petitioner no.2-husband are facing threat to the life, liberty and property at the hands of persons named in para Crl. Misc.No.M 23928 of 2010 #2# no.9 of the petitioner. Upon notice reply has been filed on behalf of respondents no.1 to 4 by Mr. Suresh Kumar, DSP, Charkhi Dadri. Learned State Counsel on instructions from ASI Attar Singh submits that in the aforesaid reply it has been submitted that standing guard has been provided by the police at the house of the petitioner no.2-Shri Bhagwan. He further submits that the petitioner sno.1 & 2(couple) is residing at Jaipur as Shri Bhagwan-petitioner no.2 is employed in Rajasthan Police. It is further submitted that since 4.3.2010 to protect the life and liberty of family members of petitioner no.3 & 4 three FIRs bearing no.101 dated 9.3.2010 under Section 147, 149, 506 Indian Penal Code P.S. Dadri, FIR No.108 dated 14.3.2010 under Section 427 and 506 Indian Penal Code P.S. Sadar Dadri and FIR No.122 dated 23.3.2010 under Section 427, 506 and 34 Indian Penal Code P.S. Sadar Dadri have been lodged which are under investigation and accused Surinder Sarpanch and Ramesh Panch along with other persons have already been arrested. Learned State Counsel further submits that since petitioner no.3 was not able to harvest his crops since April 2010, therefore, Tehsildar Dadri has been appointed a receiver as per provision of Section 145 Cr.PC and crops of petitioner no.3 were being harvested by the State. He further submits that in future also police will ensure that life and liberty of the petitioners and family members of petitioner no.2-Shri Bhagwan will be protected as and when such request shall be made. Crl. Misc.No.M 23928 of 2010 #3# In view of the steps taken and the aforesaid assurance given by the state counsel for the petitioner concedes that no further orders are required in the present petition and accordingly the same be disposed of as having become infructuous. Disposed of as infructuous. ( JASWANT SINGH ) JUDGE 28th October, 2010 Vinay