c\ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR / WRJT PETITION N0. 3737 OF 2004 PETITIONER •^y\ Ghasiram, S/o. Darasram, Aged ^•y^ i?yy <y RESPONDENTS ..^^' about 47 years, Caste - Sahu, y^''''^ Occupation - Service Gangman, [S-VT.^ R/o. Girari, Tahsil Baradwar, District janjgir-Champa, (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary 6C Ministry, Public Work Department, National Highv«ay Board, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Engineer, Public Work Department, National Highway Board, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Superintendent Engineer, Public Work Department, National Highway Board, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Sub Divisional Officer, Pubfic Work Department, National Highway, Sub Division Champa, District ]anjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF JTHE CONSTITUTIONOF 1ND1A The above named petitioner most humbly submits as under:- i^vfit a ^ ?sAvsi'rt3a;l SWWWMt^twlssnsav^ji HIOH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATISGARH : BILASPUR Sjngle Bench : Satish K. Aanihotri, J WRIT PETITION N0. 3735 of 2004 Gowardhan Prasad Vs State of Chhattisgarh andothers WRIT PETITION N0. 3736 of 2004 Firtu Ram Patel Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETITION N0. 3737 of 2004 Ghasiram Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. Ashok Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Koshy, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Vivek Sharma and Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, learned Panel Lawyers for the State ofChhattisgarh. ORDER (Passed on 20m September 2005) The petitioners in this batch of writ petitions are working as permanent labourer (Gangmen) since 1977 in the Office of the respondents. The petitioners have filed this batch of writ petitions for regularization of their service. In identical matte'rs, the question as to Whether the petitioners' would retire after completion of 30 years of service or on attaining the age of 60 years, was decided by this Court by order dated 15.09.2005 passed ;s in Writ Petition No. 93 of 2005 and other connected matters. In the said petitions the petitioners did not press the prayer for regularization, However, they sought liberty to raise the issue of regularization of their sen/ices before the appropriate forum, if necessary. The prayer for regularization was dismissed with liberty to raise the issue seeking redressal of relief of regularization before the appropriate forum. In the present cases, the petitioners seek direction of this Court to make a representation before the authorities for regularization of their sep/ices within a specified period. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the said direction, ifgranted. If any representation is filed by the petitioners for regularization of their services, therespondents are directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law at the earliest. In view ofthe foregoing, the writ petitions stand disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge