IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35662 of 2009 SATTAR ANSARI son of Anul Ansari, resident of village- Bhalsumbha P. S. Chandramandih, District Jamui…. Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 27.10.2009. Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The electric wire which is said to have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner cannot be explained by him as he is neither dealing in electricity nor he has a remote connection with the affairs of the electricity department. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has a fair antecedent and that he at best can be said to be carrier. Such submission of counsel for the petitioner must be rejected on its face value because the consequences faced by the people at large on account of disruption of electricity, largely due to theft of the electric wires, is well known. Considering all these aspects, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected 2 with a liberty that he may renew his prayer for bail after completing nine months of his judicial custody. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)