IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4573 of 2011 ASHISH RANJAN . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 26.04.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. Learned Counsel submits that the petitioner’s grand-father had a subsisting saw mills licence. He has been deceased during validity of the licence. The licence theoretically remains valid till date. The petitioner desires transfer of the licence in his name. Let the petitioner represent along with a copy of the present order before the concerned authority. If the licence in the name of grand-father of the petitioner still subsists and it is only a question of transfer of the name, the law permitting the same, let his representation be considered and disposed by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of one months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)