iSS:;'"":!!" HIGH COUKT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR M. C.C.Wo. 265 of 2009 Petitioners 1. Kodu Ram Dewaagan, son of Gendurani, aged about 55 years. 2. Phu-anta Raca, son of Late Sacaal Das, aged about 75 years. 3. Ashok Kumar, son ofLate Deen Dayal, aged about 75 years. 4, Raiakfailawan, Son of late Shyamratan, aged about 57 years. 5, Puxuya Bai, wife of Chhabi Lal, aged about 60 years. 6. Kartik Ram, son of late Sbri Aama Prasad, aged about 53 years. 7, Sukalu, son of late Koda, oged aboiit 55 years. 8. Girdhari Lal, son of late Heeralal, aged about 55 years, 9. Bharat, son oflate Thanwar, aged about 45 years, 10. P&ras, son ofJbadu, aged about 58 yeara, 11. Devwati, wife of Subhran Das, aged about 65years. 12. Jamia, wife of late Shyamlal, aged about 60 years, 13. Chaiti Bai, wtfe oflate Mohlt, aged about 50 years. 14. Shyam Bai, wife oflate Goverdhan Lal, agsd about 73 years. 15. Kishan Bai, wife oflate Babulal^ aged about 65years. 16, Jai Su^h, son of Shri Bhauraia, s^ed about 51 years. 17, Punwaram, son of late Shri Kalwa, aged about 60 years, 18. Himachal, son of Shri Tulsiram, aged about 26 years, 19. Savitri, wife oflate Sbri Mohan, aged about 42 years. 20. Ramgulal, son of late Shri Ratau, aged about 70 years. 21. Lakhan Som, son of late Shri Tanwar, aged about 58 years. 22. Shankmlal, son of Slui Puranikram, aged about 40 years. 23. Babulal, son of late Shii Kaaaiya, aged about 55 years. 24. Madaiya, son of late Shri Kolda, aged about 60 years. 25. Chavikd, son oflate Shri Raiabarousa, aged about 70 years, 26. Ramji, son of Dhawauha, aged about 63 years. —z Versus Respondents 1. \H^ n< 27, Phiranta Das, son ofSonnadas, aged about 75years AU residents of vEUage Kugda, P,H.No, 59, Tahsil Kumhari, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (CG) State of Chfaattisgarh through the Secretaiy, Department of Town aad Country Plaamng (N^ar Tatha Gram Nivesh) Dau Kalyan Siagh Bhawan, Raipiir (C.G.) The CoUector, Dwcg (C.G.) The Land Acquisition OfiBcer, Durg, Distt. Dui^iC.G.) The Chhattisgarh Housing Board through its Executwe Engineer, Division Dixrg (C.G.) The Sub Divisional OflScer, Patan, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Patwari, P.H. No. 59, Village Kugda, Distt. Du^(C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OFW.P. (O No. 7181/2007 (SB: Honl3le Shri Satish K. Agmhotri J.) ShriT, K, Tiwad, Advocate for the petitioners, Shri P, K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerfor the rcspondents No, 1 to 3, 5 &6: ORDBR 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. > 2. 3. Thakur (Passed on this 7th day ofSeptember, 2009) Heard. Pursuant to the onder dated 31.7.2009 the Registiy has submitted its report dated 29.8.2009, wherein it is stated fhat the application for amendm.ent was fiiled by the coimsel in time but no amendinent ia the Qriginal petition was carried out ini time. Thereafter, the petitioDjer has filed applicatlon for condonation ofdelay in removiag the default. In view of the above, ttus appUcation for restoiation ofthe Writ Pfetition (C) No. 7181/2007 ( Kodu Ram Dewangan Vs. State of Ghliattisgarh &• others), which was dismissed for want of prosecutiou vide order dated 17.10.2008, is restored to the origuialfile. In view of the above the appUcation is disposed of A copy of this order may be placed on recoid in Writ Petition (C) No. 7181/2007 and the same may be listed for hearing. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge