IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6504 of 2010 Date of decision: 11th November, 2010 Sumeet Garg … Petitioner Versus Radha Raman Metal Works … Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. H.P.S. Ishar, Advocate for the petitioner. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner states that another eviction petition bearing Civil Revision No.6425 of 2010 between the same parties was decided by this Court on October 4, 2010. The order dated October 4, 2010 passed in Civil Revision No.6425 of 2010 reads as under: “Counsel for the petitioner states that even though tenant had taken a very long time of 150 days to file the written statement, the same ought not to have been permitted as it has caused unnecessary delay in culmination of the proceedings. Counsel states that since the written statement has been accepted by Rent Controller, he will not press this petition but prays to this Court that the eviction petition be decided within a stipulated time frame. I find merit in the alternative submission made by Counsel for the petitioner. The present revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the Rent Controller to decide the ejectment petition filed by the petitioner within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.” Civil Revision No.6504 of 2010 Counsel for the petitioner prays that the present petition be disposed of in terms of the order passed on October 4, 2010 in Civil Revision No.6425 of 2010. Ordered accordingly. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE November 11, 2010 rps 2