IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 8TH ASWINA 1930 LA.App..No. 100 of 2007(D) -------------------------- LAR.54/1999 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... APPELLANT: 1ST RESPONDENT IN THE LAR. ---------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REP.BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LATHA T.THANKAPPAN RESPONDENTS: CLAIMANT & 2ND RESPONDENT IN THE LAR --------------------------------------------------- 1. LEELAMMA, T.C.35/442, VALLAKADAV, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. ETTICHAKCO, T.C.35/442, VALLAKADAV, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DIRECTOR, INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA, AIRPORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.K.L.NARASIMHAN FOR R3 SRI.V.SANTHARAM FOR R3 SMT.M.HEMALATHA FOR R1-R2 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON I.A.NO.392 OF 2007 IN LAA NO.100 OF 2007 DISMISSED 30.9.2008 SD/- PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L.A.A.No.100 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 30th September, 2008 JUDGMENT This appeal is filed by the Government pursuant to a notification dated 25.4.1994 for the purpose of International Airport, Trivandrum. As against the land value of Rs.49588/- per are awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer, the learned Subordinate Judge relying on Ext.A1 judgment in LAR No.12/99 refixed the compensation at Rs.77,628/- per Are. The learned Government Pleader would fairly concede before me that this court considering an appeal preferred by some other claimants whose properties were acquired, refixed the compensation by granting a further enhancement of 27% over the enhancement granted by the court below. I have gone through the judgment of the reference court. It is seen that relevant parameters for determining the market value of the lands acquired for the very same purposes have been kept in mind by the learned Subordinate Judge and that the learned Judge has given good reasons for arriving such conclusions for determination of correct market value of the properties. I do not find any warrant for interfering with the judgment. The appeal will stand dismissed. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE W.P.C.No. - 2 -