IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20118-2011 Date of decision:09.08.2011. Lalit Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Sunil Saharan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Malik, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Jagjit Beniwal, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has joined the investigation. This fact is admitted by the learned State Counsel on instructions received from ASI Kailash Chand. He further states that the complainant has even given in writing that she does not want to receive the dowry articles. She has also stated before the police that she would file some case for maintenance. Be that as it may, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the interim order dated 07.07.2011 passed by this Court is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein. The petition shall stand disposed of. August 09, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE