Civil Revision No.973 of 2009(O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Civil Revision No.973 of 2009(O&M) Decided on : November 27, 2009 Prahlad Singh ... Petitioner VERSUS Khushi Ram and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Adarsh Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the respondents. A.N.JINDAL, J.- Heard. The counsel for the petitioner – defendant has stated that the evidence has already come on the record that there are other joint properties of the parties, therefore, he wants to take a specific plea with regard to partial partition. At the same time, counsel for the respondent – plaintiff has stated that this legal question could be decided while adjudicating upon the main issue with regard to partition and there is no requirement of taking a fresh plea. In the circumstances, the revision petition is dismissed. However, the Trial Court is directed to decide the question of partial Civil Revision No.973 of 2009(O&M) [ 2 ] partition, while deciding the relief part of the suit. Needless to state that the respondent – plaintiff may lead any evidence in rebuttal to rebut the evidence already led by the petitioner – defendant. November 27, 2009 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE