$£9§€§LE @E‘M6H n’\ “2 @v—éL gTHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT mLASPUR § w. P. (S) No3t2¢§ 12008 1) Smt. Ochlaa Yadav Wlo. Shri Dashrath lal Yadav, aged about— 60 years, Nagar f 4 Sanyojalg Chhattisgarh Shikshak Sangh, / \pqay Branch — Rajnandgaon, Assistant (O Teacher, Government Primary School L/OwrE MoharallffDistrict- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) PETITIONERS 4:“ W” ”r“/’‘:'rr::--1. » tfwr : w . Ku. Urmila Shrivastava Dlo Shri Taresh Shrivastava, Age-60 Years, Assistant Teacher, Government Girls Schooi no.8,Ganjpara, District— Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Kushai Ram Munde Slo Shri Shiv Narayan Munde, Age—6’1 Years, Teacher. Government Primary School Mohara,/ (Attached to middle school) District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 4) Mukund Ram Verma S/o Shri Ghasiyaram Verma,Age-51 Years, Teacher, Government _Pre-Middle School, Seonikala, District— Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 5) Ramkishun Gajendra Slo Pardeshi Ram, Age-58 Years, Teacher, Government High School, Sukuldaihaan, District— Rajnandgaon (C.G.) W J I n " 2) District Education Officer,/’ Rajnandgaon, Collectorate, District- Rajnandgaon /. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. The above named Petitioners respectfully Submit as under:- 5’’. ‘V!. l v‘»/,,. ’ ’ 6) Balwant Devdhar S/o Shri Vishnu Pant Devdhar Shrivastava, Age—56 Years, I” Teacher, Government Primary School /’ t Mohara,(Attached to middle school) é} District— Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 7) Manik Ram Verma S/o Ubheram Verma, Age- 58 Years, Teacher, Government / Pre-Middle School,Rengakathera(Bakhat) District — Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 8) Dharamiai Dewangan S/o Shri Horiiai Dewangan, Age-60 Years, Teacher, (I. Government Pre-Middie School Kalyanpur, District— Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 9) Bihari Das Vaishnav S/o Chabbi Lai ,i i: Vaishnav, Age-57 Years, Teacher, Government Pre-Middle School Bahmani Charbhata, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) . iii VERSUS t: RESPONDENTS : 1) State of Chhattisgarh. m‘ Through- Secretary, School Education Department, DKS t Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Maw ammm mmm WW wW SB : Hon’bie Shri Manindra Mohzm Shrivastava J. 17-06-2011 Shri Anup Majumdar, counsel for the petitioners. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panei La ‘ er for the State. The petitioners have med this petition aggrieved by orders dated 24l4/06 and 23/8/07 by which th second Lip-gradation under time bound advancement scheme has been iven effect to from 1/8i2003 instead of 17/3f1 999. it is submitted that the I etitioners have aireaciy avaiied the benefit of time bound advancement sch me from the year 2000 and now they apprehends that the respondents may recover excess payments made t6 them. Learned counsel for the pa ‘ es jointly submit that the issue invoived in the writ petition is identicai to the is ue decided by this Court vide order dated 2512i2011 in W.P.($) NO.5898/0( (Shekh Zabbar Quraishi and others v. State of Chhattisgarh and others) d W.F.($) No.6570i’07 (Santiai Sahu and others v. State of Chhattisgarh an others) in view of the joint submissi n made by learned counsei for the parties, the impugned order dated 23I8/0/ passed in respect of the petitioners and subsequent recovery proceedings nitiated against the petitioners are hereby quashed. Accordingiy, the writ petitio is aiiowed on the same terms as order dated 25i2i‘2011 passed in the ca e of Shekh Zabbar Quraishi (Supra) and $antial (Supra). Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge vww