IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 22ND JUNE 2010 / 1ST ASHADHA 1932 WA.No. 1027 of 2010() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.2853/2010 Dated 07/06/2010 .................... APPELLANTS: -------------- 1. MAJEED S/O.MUHAMMAD, CC.20/1453,(16/325)NEW KONAM DESOM, PALLURUTHI VILLAGE,KOCHI-6. 2. SUNITHA W/O.SHAMEER, THUNDAPARAMBIL, KONAM DESOM,PALLURUTHY,KOCHI-6. 3. SABEENA W/O.ANZIL,KOTTATHARA HOUSE, CC 20/1412,KONAM DESOM,PALLURUTHY, KOCHI-5 4. GEETHA D/O.PRABHAKARAN,NALUKANDATHIL CC 20/1442(16/1269)NEW KONAM DESOM, PALLURUTY,KOCHI-6. 5. SAJITHA AGED 41 YEARS,SHAJI, MARAVATTI CHUVAD, KONAM,PERUMPADAPPU,KOCHI, ERNAKULAM DIST. 6. JASMIN, 34 YEARS, W/O.BASHEER MARAVATTI CHUVAD, KONAM, PERUMPADAPPU,KOZHI,ERNAKULAM DIST. 7. BEEVI, W/O.SHAMEER, MARAVATTI CHUVAD, PARUMPADAPPU,KOCHI,ERNAKULAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. SANTHA W/O.LATE RAVEENDRAN, KOLOTH (H), SANATHANA ROAD, KONAM,PALLURUTHY. 2. VILASINI W/O.VISWAMBHARAN, MALIYACKAL HOUSE,KONAM,PALLURUTHY. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,COLLECTORATE, ERNAKULAM. 4. THE CORPORATION OF COCHIN, REP.BY THE SECRETARY, CORPORAITON HOUSE, ERNAKULAM. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, FORT KOCHI, ERNAKULAM. R3&5 BY GOVT. PLEADER R4 BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH BABU, SC THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. .................................................................... Writ Appeal No.1027 of 2010 .................................................................... Dated this the 22nd day of June, 2010. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Heard counsel for the appellants and counsel appearing for the respondents. This is an appeal filed against interim order passed by the learned Single Judge directing the Corporation to evict those who have encroached and blocked the drainage canal. Counsel for the appellants submitted that appellants have not encroached any drainage canal and they are living in puramboke land. If that be so, we find no grievance for the appellants because judgment does not talk about eviction except to clear the canal. We, therefore, dismiss the Writ Appeal. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge P.S.GOPINATHAN Judge pms