IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4638 of 2009 Between: Md.Yousuf Alif ..... PETITIONER AND Vakil .....RESPONDENT ORDER: The petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.29 of 2008 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, at Medchal, Ranga Reddy District. Along with the suit, he also filed I.A.No.81 of 2008 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 r/w Section 151 CPC seeking ad interim injunction restraining the respondent and his men from interfering with his peaceful possession over the suit schedule property, which was opposed by the respondent. Through the order, dated 18.06.2008, the trial Court dismissed the said application. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed C.M.A.No.169 of 2008 before the learned VI Additional Senior Civil Judge (FTC) at Medchal, Ranga Reddy District. The lower appellate Court also, after re-appreciating the material on record, dismissed the CMA confirming the order of the trial Court. Hence, the present civil revision petition. Heard the learned counsel and perused the material on record. Though the petitioner claims to be in possession of the suit schedule property for more than 40 years and perfected his rights over the same by adverse possession, the fact remains that he has not filed any documents to substantiate the same. Both the Courts below, on appreciation of the material on record, concurrently held that the petitioner failed to establish prima facie case for grant of ad interim injunction and accordingly dismissed the application. This Court discerns no infirmity whatsoever in the order of the Courts below warranting revisional interference, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The civil revision petition is devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed, at the admission stage. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date:21.10.2009 VGB