IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37662 of 2010 ARJUN YADAV, Son of Murari Yadav, resident of village Kharkhatwa, P.S. Sahodara, District West Champaran …… Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Bimlesh Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pramod Kr. Pandey, A.P.P. ---- 2 03.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the informant has been examined during trial and though she has supported the first information report but she has put forward some different story. Learned counsel for the State submitted that the informant has supported the case as put forward in the first information report in her deposition. Petitioner’s prayer for bail has earlier been rejected vide order dated 23.4.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 2286 of 2010 after hearing at length. 2 No fresh ground are forthcoming for grant of bail. As a prayer for bail is once again refused as the petitioner is said to be the assailant of the deceased. However, it has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that out of seven, three prosecution witnesses have already been examined. In above view of the matter, it is expected from the trial court to take steps for expeditious disposal of the trial, preferably, within six months. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)