HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sinale Bench : Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh. J. Miscellaneous Appeal (C.S No.333 of 2008 Appellant Bahali, S/o Sundar Ram, Caste- Claiamnt kushwaha, aged about 50 years, occupation Business and Agriculture, R/o Village Karkoti, P.S. Bhaiyathan, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (M.P.) now (C.G.) versus Respondents Non-ADDlicant 1. Indar Prasad, S/o Devnarayan Sao, aged about 60 years, occupation Business and Agriculture, R/o Village, P.S.- Jhilmiti, Tahsil Surajpur, Disfrict Surguja (C.G.) (Owner) 2. Ashwani Kumar Sharma, S/o Sudhakar Prasad Sharma, agedabout 45 yeare, occupation Driver, R/o Village Sewaripara, P.S. Jhilmili, Tahsil - Surajpur, Dtstrict Suiguja (C.G.) (Driver) Appeat underSection 173oftheMotorVehiciesAct 1988 Present: Shri O. P. Yadav, counset for the appellant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 28th day of March, 2008) Heard on I.A.No.1, an application for tatdng ckxsument on record. Considered and allowed. Documerrt is taken on record. (2) Heard on admission. N ^ (3) The appellant is aggrieved by an award dated 17-10-2007 passed by the 2^ Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, F.T.C., Surguja (henceforth "fte Tribunal") in Motor Accidents Claim Case No.22/2005 wherebycompensation of Rs.5,000/- was awarded in an injury case. ?^ (4) It is not disputed that no medical evidence was adduced by the ctaimant to prove the factum of any grievous injury sustained by the claimant in the accident. The Tribunal has recorded a finding that the claimant had sustained simple injury and awarded compensation of Rs.5,000/-. The impugned award, therefore, calls for no interference. (5) tnthe result.thisappeal beingdevoid ofanymeritistlismissedat the stage of admission. 'SST DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge Tumane .v-f ^l.