CWP No.17013 of 2009 : 1 : In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Date of decision: 19.01.2010 1.CWP No.17013 of 2009 Suresh Ahlawat and others Vs. State of Haryana and others 2.CWP No.17793 of 2009 A.K. Madan Vs. State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI Present: Mr. Aman Chaudhary, Advocate,for the petitioners. Mr.RKS Brar, Addl.AG, Haryana, for the respondents. PERMOD KOHLI, J. (Oral): Vide order dated 09.11.2009 passed by this Court, Harsih Rathee, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, had accepted notice on behalf of the respondents. No reply has been filed. The petitioners have relied upon a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana and another Vs. Deepak Sood and others, (Civil Appeal No.4446 of 2008) decided on 15.07.2008. The petitioners are claiming benefit on the strength of the aforesaid judgment. Apart from the above, it is contended that the case of the petitioners has been recommended by the Engineer in Chief, Haryana, Public Health Engg. Department to the Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Govt. Haryana, Public Health Engg. Department, Chandigarh, for consideration and appropriate orders. The copy of the CWP No.17013 of 2009 : 2 : letter dated 29.09.2009 (Annexure P-19) whereby the case of the petitioners was recommended by the Engineer-in-Chief to the Government has been placed on record. I have perused the same. As a matter of fact, the Engineer-in-Chief has taken into consideration all the relevant factors including the judgment of the Apex Court and he recommended the case for the grant of desired relief to the petitioners. In view of the above circumstances, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to take a final decision on the recommendations of the Engineer-in-Chief made vide Annexure P-19 and pass appropriate orders thereon within a period of one month from the date a certified copy of the judgment is made available to the competent authority. Needless to say, all the relevant factors mentioned in the recommendations letter will be taken into consideration. If the recommendation is to be rejected, the same shall be by passing a speaking and well reasoned order dealing with all the aspects mentioned in the recommendations. No costs. A copy of this order be placed on the connected file. 19.01.2010 (PERMOD KOHLI) BLS JUDGE