^'^ ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRTT PETITION fS) N0. i?9^ OF 2010 PETmONER RESPONDENTS -^- ^/'i ' ^^' ^y' Smt. Nidhi Singh D/o Shri Vijay Narayan Singh, wife of Shri Ratan Singh, aged about 47 years, Resident of Babupara Jail Road, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through: the Secretary, Tnbai Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Commissioner, Tribal Development, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). ^ 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). ./" -. -. . _. _. ^--. ^ 4. ^The Block Education Officer, Lun-ifq ?, District Surguja (C.G.). "-r^^IT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . \^-^\^ <y ^^'n/^ ^•1 VI ^3-<[®.)T.j/ "l;"S[i HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BSLASPUR WRIT PETSTiON (SS N0. 6338 OF 2010 Petitaoner Smt. Nidhi Singh Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRiT PETIT10N UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri V.K.Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panei Lawyer for the State. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on this 25tn day of February, 2011) 1. Shri Shridhar, learned counsel appearing for the State/ respondents submits fhat the representation dated 4.9.2010 (Annexure P-5) moved by the petltloner before the respondent authorities, shall be considered, jnaccordance with law, on its own merit, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. 2. in view of foregoing, iearned counse! appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing survlves for adjudication in this matter. 3. Accordingly, the writ petltion stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge _J: ashok