1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi COURT RECEIVER’S REPORT NO.149 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.2043 OF 2005. Aruna A. Dholakia. ..Plaintiff. vs. Darshak Hariprasad Dholakia & Ors. ..Defendants. .... Mr. Prakash Shah, for Plaintiff. Mr. K.L. Vyas, Court Receiver. Mr. A. Krishnanand Rao, representative of Mr. Bhagwat Rai, Agent of C.R. is present. .... CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 18TH JUNE 2009. P.C. Despite notice given to the Court Receiver’s agent and his Advocate as directed by the order of this Court dated 10 th June 2009, the Court Receiver’s agent and his Advocate are absent. The Court Receiver’s agent has not paid the royalty to the Court Receiver from 20 th September 2008 till date as well as the late fee. 2. Mr.K.K. Rao, representative of Mr. Bhagwat Rai, agent 2 of the Court Receiver is present in Court. He has informed the Court that Mr. Bhagwat Rai has received the notice from the Court Receiver alongwith the order passed by this Court dated 10 th June 2009. He states that Mr. Bhagwat Rai is not well and he has asked him to watch as to what is happening in the matter. 3. The Court Receiver’s agent is, therefore, directed to pay the entire arrears of royalty amount within a period of one week from today, failing which the Court Receiver to take forcible possession of the suit premises, by taking police assistance. 4. The Court Receiver’s Report is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b) and (e). 5. In view thereof, the Court Receiver’s Report stands disposed of. [ S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ]