IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 1024 of 2009 Date of Decision: 1.9.2009 Jagdish Chander ....Petitioner. Versus Kala Singh and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Harsh Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Sharma, DAG, Haryana. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. The plaintiff-petitioner has approached this Court by way of instant revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning the order dated 22.12.2008 (Annexure P-1) passed by the trial court whereby the application filed by respondents No.11 and 12 under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure for being impleaded as defendants in the suit, was allowed. The trial court while allowing the aforesaid application had noticed that defendants No.11 and 12 who had been impleaded in the suit were proper parties as grant had been received by them for the construction of Harijan Chaupal on the suit property. Even otherwise, on a query being put to the learned counsel that as to how the said order had caused prejudice to the plaintiff-petitioner, he failed to give any reply much less a satisfactory one. C.R. No. 1024 of 2009 -2- In view of the above, no illegality or perversity could be found in the order impugned herein which may warrant interference by this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, there is no merit in this revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed. September 1, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE