^ In the Hiah Court of Chhattisaarh. Bilaspur WP (227) - 5^ S~9 / 2008 Petitioner Jeevan Bus Service, By Attorney - Tuleshwar Vaishnav, 37 Yrs., S/o Shri jagmohan Vaishnav, New Bus Stand, Raipur Versus t Respondents ..1. 1. Regional Transport Authority, CG - Raipur 2. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, CG - Raipur 3. M/s. Kanker Roadways, Civil Line, Raipur ^ME^r^ei^^ Petition UnderArt. 227 ofthe Constitution oflndia ^^"''^ //:^^ "% 1 \ \^^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Writ Petition (227) No.3150 of 2008 Petitioner Respondents versus Jeevan Bus Service Regional Transport Authority, CG and others Present: Shri Raja Sharma, counsei for the petitioner. Shri R.R.Sinha, Panel Lawyerforthe State/respondents No.1 and 2. Shri S.K.Bajpai, counsel for respondent No.3. WrjtPetition underArticle 227 ofthe Constitution of India ORAL ORDER (Passed on 10th February, 2011) Challenge in this writ petition is to the order of State Transport Appeliate Tribunal confirming the • order of Regional Transport Authority refusing to change the timing of permanent permit held by the petitioner on the route Kathautiya - Raipur. 2. The said permanent permit No.235/05 was valid upto 4-1- 2011. Thus, the period of permit having expired, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. However, if the petitioner is allowed a fresh permit or the earlier permit is renewed/extended, it would be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the concerned authority for change oftiming and in such eventuality the respondent No.3 would also be at liberty to raise objection to the application moved by the petitioner, 3. With the above observation, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- prashantKumarMishra Judge Gopal