IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 28 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 42 OF 2009 SMT. SALIMA BI ... Applicant Versus PATRIARCHATE AND ANR., ... Respondents Shri. Sudin M. S. Usgaonkar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. M. B. D'Costa, Senior Advocate with Mr. J. A. Lobo, Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 21st February, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. Usgaonkar, learned Counsel for the applicant. Mr. Usgaonkar submits that the finding recorded in paragraph 9 that the lower appellate Court could not have given a finding that the instrument dated 22nd March, 1934 was a document of aforamento on the ground that in the earlier suit the said contention was negatived is concerned, discloses an error apparent on the face of record. 2. I find no ground to grant review on the basis of the said submission. Even if the said finding is set aside, the impugned order is not liable to be set aside and, therefore, the question of granting review on the said ground does not arise. Hence, the application stands dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA