IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12305 of 2011 Achche Lal Sharma @ Ajay Lal Sharma Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.12860 of 2011 Uday Chand Jaiswal Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.12871 of 2011 Upendra Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.12983 of 2011 Ashok Sah Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.13143 of 2011 Krishna Singh & Ors Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.13180 of 2011 Amirak Rajak Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.13208 of 2011 Vijay Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.2788 of 2011 Dashrath Prasad Verma Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.2948 of 2011 Anandi Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.2974 of 2011 Bishwa Bharti Ram Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors With 2 CWJC No.11455 of 2011 Chandramauli Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.11881 of 2011 Shiv Kumari Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.12747 of 2011 Dharmdev Choudhary Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr with CWJC No.12816 of 2011 Ramashankar Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr with CWJC No.12817 of 2011 Kashi Nath Ram Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr with CWJC No.12824 of 2011 Nandji Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr with CWJC No.12896 of 2011 Umesh Prasad Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.13134 of 2011 Narvdeshwar Upadhyaya Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr with CWJC No.13176 of 2011 Vinayak Rai Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr with CWJC No.13212 of 2011 Kapil Deo Thakur Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr With CWJC No.13213 of 2011 Jagdish Rai Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr 3 with CWJC No.13228 of 2011 Maharana Pratap Singh & Ors Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.13250 of 2011 Ramdani Ram & Ors Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.13519 of 2011 Abinash Kumar & Anr Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.13266 of 2011 Bashisth Narayan Singh & Ors Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.13341 of 2011 Suresh Chaudhary Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.13273 of 2011 Ramsingar Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr with CWJC No.13288 of 2011 Suresh Chandra Ojha Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr with CWJC No.13298 of 2011 Atma Thakur Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr with CWJC No.13318 of 2011 Bhishmacharya Rai Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr with CWJC No.13349 of 2011 Kamakhya Rai Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr With 4 CWJC No.13358 of 2011 Kamlesh Ram & Ors Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.13377 of 2011 Hari Shankar Rai Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.13379 of 2011 Pinku Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.13385 of 2011 Munnu Prasad & Ors Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.13412 of 2011 Most.Nutan Devi & Ors Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 2/ 19.08.2011 The petitioners, who are the licensee under the 1984 Unification Order as well as under the Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2001 pray for quashing the memo issued by the concerned authorities, directing refund of value of undistributed rice under 50 % and 30 % of Sampurna Gramin Rojgar Yojana in between the years 2002 to 2006 at APL rate of Rs.13.10 per Kg. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would 5 also govern the instant writ petitions. The writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioners would either deposit 20% of the value of undistributed rice at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within two months. This order would not come in the way of petitioners, if they want to deposit the value of rice or rice itself in excess of 20%. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)