IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 11TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 20TH KARTHIKA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 145 of 2009(S) -------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.6343/1998 Dated 14/02/2006 .................... PETITIONER(S): 2ND ADDITONAL PETITIONER IN THE O.P. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- SUVARNA, W/O. VICTOR THANKACHAN, KIZHARIKKAZHIKATHU VEEDU, FROM KOCHUTHOPPIL, THANNI ERAVIPURAM, PANCHAYATH, MAYYANAD.P.O, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.SURESH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 IN THE O.P. --------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SHEIK PAREED, AGE NOT KNOWN & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITONER DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. PRASANNA KUMAR,AGE NOT KNOWN & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES, KOLLAM. R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ Con.Case (C) NO. 145 OF 2009 (S) ========================= Dated this the 11th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T What is complained of in this petition is non compliance of the directions of this Court in Annexure A1 judgment, which according to the petitioner entitles her for allotment of 3 cents of land in implementation of the National Fishermen Welfare Scheme. 2. Last occassion, the case was adjourned with a direction to the learned Government Pleader to obtain instructions in the allotment of land in pursuance to the above. 3. Today, on instructions, learned Government Pleader submits that in order to give a quietus to the controversy, 3 cents of land situated in Sy.No.748/1 of Thanni Village can be alloted to the petitioner who is the legal heir of late Victor Thankachan. Therefore, I record the submission and close the contempt petition. It will be open to the petitioner to produce a copy of this judgment before the Deputy Director of Fisheries, Kollam, the 2nd respondent herein, and seek the benefit of the judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp