i ran © IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPUR (C.&.) W.P. (S) N0. 2-0^ /201 1 /' PETCTIONER Raman Prasad Shukla, Aged about 61 years, S/o Late Shri M.P.Shukla, Head Master, Govemment Middle w"^ ..-• School Jamnipali, Block Kartala, ^^y^^^J^"""''" Distt. Korba (C.6.) ^^ "^ •^' \,^ ^3 **u?' <d ••••'" \^" RESPONbENTS ^\ VERSUS ^ 1. State of Chhattisgar-h Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) 2/' Commissioner Tribal Welfare bepartment Raipur (C.G.) 3.' Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfar'e Department Korba, Distt. Korba (C.6.) ^^ 4. Joint Director, Treasury, accounts, pension, Korba (C.6.) t' 5. Block Education Officer, Kartala, Distt. Korba (C.(5.) WRFT PETCTTON UNDER AKTICUE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA &)^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISG.^H AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WRTTPETI'HQN (S) No. 2038 of2011 Raman Prasad ShuMa. RESPOMDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Ofhers. WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF 2. SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Asmhotri. J, Present: Shri K.S.Pawar, Advocate for tfae petitioner. Sliri Y.S.Tliakur, Deputy Advocate General fortlie State. ORUER (ORAL) (Passed oa 18th day ofApril, 2011) Leamed counsel appearing for tfae petitioner, on instmctions, seeks pennission ofthis Court to vvifhdraw this petition with liberty to make a. representation in the light of circular dated 05.01.2011 (Annexure P/2) issued bv the Govemment of Clihattisgarh, School Education Department. Leamed counsei appearing for other side has no objection. 3. No permission ofthis Court is required to make representation to the respondent authorities. Thus, such dh-ection cannot be issued. However, ifthe petitioners make a representation to the respondent authorities, the same may be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits and perspective. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Amit