IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 2ND SEPTEMBER 2010 / 11TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 27177 of 2010(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ROY FELIX, S/O. P.L.FELIX, ASSISTANT CONTROLLER, LEGAL METROLOGY, FLYING SQUAD, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM, RESIDING AT CHERUVILAKATH HOUSE, VAYALAR P.O., CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.JAYACHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. ARAVINDA KUMAR BABU T.N. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 27177 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 2nd day of September, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner was imposed with the punishment of barring of one increment with cumulative effect under the Kerala Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, which, according to the petitioner, was despite the enquiry officer exonerating the petitioner. The petitioner filed Ext. P2 review petition, which was later corrected by Ext. P3 review petition. The petitioner now seeks a direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P3 review petition expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P3 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.