1 criap-3176.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3176 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 378 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and the Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: A. H. Joshi and A. R. Joshi, JJ. Date : 23rd August 2011 Shri D.V. Soman, Advocate, for the applicant. Shri V.D. Godbharle, A.P.P. for Respondent-State. ---------- 1. Heard learned Advocate Shri D.V. Soman, for the applicant and Shri V.D. Godbharle, learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Perused the impugned judgment. The impugned judgment, in no ambiguous terms, mentions that there is no incriminating evidence whatsoever against the accused person. 2 criap-3176.11 3. The learned Sessions Judge has expressed serious concern and disapproval about the manner in which the investigation is carried out. This, however, does not mean that there is any evidence against the accused persons. The observation that the investigation is not satisfactory does not entitle the appellant- complainant to have a cause against the accused against whom there is no evidence. 4. We do not find any merit in the appeal. The application for leave to file appeal is, therefore, rejected. Appeal which is on stamp number need not be registered. Appeal dismissed. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) ( A. H. JOSHI, J.) pnd/criap-3176.11