IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32819 of 2011 Binod Kr. Pandey @ Pappu Pandey Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 24.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is an accused in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 85/2011 registered under Section 366 (A) of the I.P.C. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that on investigation the police submitted final form finding as mistake of fact as statement of victim, Sangeeta Kumari was recorded under Section 164 Cr. P.C. denied allegation but later on pressure of the parents the victim gave an application before the C.J.M. in which she has stated that about her kidnapping by petitioner causing fear on point of pistol. It is further submitted that petitioner is in custody since 04.06.2011 without any fault. Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 85/2011. Kamlesh (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)