1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7875 OF 2009 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office } Memoranda of Coram, } Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's } orders or directions } and Registrar's orders } ___________________________}___________________________________ Mr. A.M.Gaikwad, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. S.G.Nandedkar, A.G.P. for State. ................ [ CORAM : B.R.GAVAI, J. ] DATE : 24/11/2009. PER COURT : 1. By way of present Writ Petition, the petitioners challenge the order dated 27/8/2009, thereby directing that the preliminary issue, which is raised by the petitioners should be decided with the other issues. 2. The respondent – employee has filed the Suit for recovery of salary. The application by the present petitioner came to be filed in the said Suit for deciding the preliminary issue regarding the jurisdiction after the evidence of the 2 plaintiff was over. 3. In that view of the matter, no perversity is noticed in the order passed by the learned trial court in holding that the issue would be decided along with other issues. 4. Even from the perusal of the issues framed by the learned trial court, I find that for deciding the issue regarding jurisdiction, it will be necessary that the evidence is to be adduced on behalf of the parties in that respect. The present Writ Petition is, therefore, rejected. [ B.R.GAVAI ] JUDGE knp/WP7875.09