IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8169 of 2010 1. CHANDAN SAO 2. Raju Kumar Both s/o Sri Maheshwari Sao, r/o village-Rampur,P.S.-Jamhor,Dist.-Aurangabad. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the Petitioners :Mr.Ram Kumar Singh,Advocate For the State :Mr. R.B.Roy,`Raman’,Addl.P.P. ------------ 02/ 13-04-2010 Heard the parties. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Jamhore P.S.Case No.80 of 2009 dated 24-07-2009, registered under Sections 363/363A/365 of the Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution case, petitioners along with other co-accused persons are alleged to have kidnapped the minor son of the informant for the purpose of begging. By referring to Annexure-2, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that allegation of kidnapping stands contradicted, though he has fairly admitted that the victim boy has not been traced out as yet. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that petitioners are named in the FIR as accused and the victim boy is still traceless and in a case like this custodial interrogation of the accused is must. In that view of the matter, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Petitioners must surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If such a petition is filed, the same may be considered and 2 disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. AH/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)