IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32155 of 2009 JAG LAL RAI, son of Late Kapil Rai, resident of village Chintamanganj, P.S. Gorkha, District Saran Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 9.9.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. Considering the fact that the allegation made in the F.I.R. with regard to causing fire arm injury by the petitioner stands substantiated from the injury report as noted by the Supervising Officer in the supervision note and recorded by the court below while rejecting prayer for bail, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is aged about 80 years or that there was delay in lodging of the F.I.R. by 11 days would not be sufficient for release of the petitioner on bail, especially when the allegation stands substantiated by the medical evidence. The further plea of the petitioner that there was no injury report before the court below will have hardly any effect because the court below has proceeded 2 on the basis of a fact recorded by the Supervising Officer with regard to existence of fire arm injury on the person of the informant which was attributable to the petitioner. All these aspects in fact have been the reasons for not granting bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/