IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30363 of 2011 Sriman Pandit, Son of Prahlad Pandit, Resident of Village Amauna, P.S. Daud Nagar, District Aurangabad. ………Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar. 2.Sunita Devi @ Dalu Devi, Wife of Sriman Pandit, Daughter of Lalan Pandit, Present Address – resident of village Gopalganj, Bajar, P.S. Dhosi, District Jehanabad. ……….Opposite parties ----------------- 04/- 16/11/2011 Heard Dr. Lelawati Kumari learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Awadh Kishor Singh learned counsel for the complainant-opposite party no. 2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A), 323, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act, is named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant marrying with her after death of his wife blessed with five children and through the complainant also he has two children. Submission of the Bar is that complainant is one and only wife of the petitioner and he intends to resume and continue the matrimonial life. There is positive response from the complainant through her counsel. In view of the above, in the event of petitioner filing an application before the court below stating such intention/parties files joint petition of compromise, in the event of his arrest/surrender within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in connection with Complaint Case No. 425 of 2010, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Further, additional condition, in the event of filing individual petition on behalf of the petitioner or joint petition of compromise by the parties, stating such intention, the court below on receipt of positive response from the complainant permit the couple to reside at their place of choice on the condition to report personally to the court below on the dates fixed for the purpose and only after being satisfied of their conduct for a reasonable period, the court below shall pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)