WP(C) 4713/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T VAIPHEI Heard Mr P Talukdar, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr UK Goswami, the learned Standing counsel, Education Department. There is no dispute at the Bar that this writ petition can be disposed o f in terms of the judgment and order reported in 2006(2) GLT 216 (SMT Talukdar v s. State of Assam and Ors). Needless to say, the grievance of the petitioner is about non-payment of her salaries even though she had been appointed to the post of Assistant Teache r of Gar-Para LP School since 9.6.1995. She was apparently appointed after she appeared in the interview conducted by the competent authority and was selected by the Deputy Inspector of Schools, Dhemaji, whereafter she was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in a monthly stipend of Rs. 900/- per month vide the order dat ed 8.6.1995. The last of the representations submitted by her is found at Annex ure 5 to the writ petition, which was addressed to the respondent No. 1. In ter ms of the directions of this Court, a Committee has been formed by the State Gov ernment to consider the cases relating to non-payment of salaries of school teac hers. Consequently, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the responde nt No. 1 i.e. Commissioner/Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Elementary Education Department to place the representation dated 29.8.2011 (Annexure 5) before the Court Appointed Committee without any loss of time whereafter the Court Appointe d Committee shall dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order. For easy reference, the petit ioner will submit a fresh copy of the writ petition to the respondent No. 1 with in the next three days. This writ petition stands disposed of.