THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 22412 of 2010 Oral order: By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks to declare the action of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in not taking action on his complaints dated 12.08.2010 and 18.08.2010 made against respondent No.3, as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently direct respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to take action thereon forthwith. As can be seen from the pleadings there are civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.3. The petitioner filed suit in O.S. No. 3509 of 2005 against respondent No.3, while respondent No.3 filed suit in O.S. No. 3583 of 2005. Both the suits were decreed by the IX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Both the suits were decreed by judgment and decree dated 03.09.2007. The petitioner claims to have filed E.P. No. 28 of 2008 for implementation of the judgment and also obtained police protection by order dated 31.03.2008. Thereafter, as respondent No.3 indulged in criminal acts, the petitioner states that he filed private complaint, and the complaint having been refereed to the police, respondent No.1 registered a case in Crime No. 1004 of 2009 on 07.09.2009 against respondent No.3. The learned Government Pleader for Home, based on the written instructions received from the respondent submitted that there are civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.3. That as petitioner and respondent No.3 quarreled, they registered a case in Crime No. 537 of 2010. Thereafter, on the complaint of the petitioner, a case in Crime No. 315 of 2010 was registered, and the same has been referred as civil in nature. Thereafter, the petitioner filed private complaint, which was referred by the III Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, and on 07.09.2010 a case in Crime No. 1004 of 2009 was registered. Thereafter, based on two complaints lodged by the wife of respondent No.3, cases were registered against the petitioner in Crime Nos. 741 and 933 of 2010 and they are under investigation. She further submitted that based on the complaint dated 05.07.2010, he made an entry in the General Diary and is conducting enquiry. Since respondent No.1 is investigating into the allegations made by the petitioner in the complaint against respondent No.3, he would take necessary action based on the investigation. Therefore, no orders need be passed in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 8th September, 2010 KSR