IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.19765 of 2011 Date of Decision : October 20, 2011. Vinay Gupta .....Petitioner versus Pt.B.D.Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sandeep Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is doing BDS Course in respondent No.3-Dental College. He alleges that due to personal vendetta and unsavoury relationship with his father, the teachers of respondent No.3-College have deliberately failed him in the examination notwithstanding his bright academic career and consistent good performance in the previous examination(s). In sum and substance the petitioner seeks re-valuation of his answer-sheets with the intervention of this Court. It is well settled that unless there is an express provision in the Regulations/Ordinance/Rules, re-valuation of the answer sheets cannot be claimed by an examinee as a matter of right. No direction in this regard can be issued by this Court. CWP No.19765 of 2011 [2] The father of the petitioner has, however, made a complaint to the Vice-Chancellor of the respondent-University. Since the allegations levelled by him are serious in nature, it appears imperative upon the University-authorities to look into those allegations and if so required, to hold a fact finding enquiry. Suffice it to say that if the fact finding enquiry holds that the petitioner is a victim of the circumstances created by the Management of respondent No.3-College, the University-authorities cannot be silent spectators or helpless to undo the injustice. This order, however, shall not be construed as if this Court has accepted the allegations levelled by the petitioner or his father against the Management or the teachers of the respondent No.3-College. The University-authorities are accordingly directed to consider the complaint made by the petitioner's father objectively and without being influenced by the observations made herein- above and pass the appropriate orders within a period of two weeks from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. If an enquiry has already been initiated, the University may continue and complete the same in a time bound manner. Ordered accordingly. Let a copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for the petitioner under the signatures of the Bench Secretary on payment of usual dasti charges. October 20, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE