IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12956 of 2010 RAMAKANT SINGH, son of Late Muneshwar Singh, resident of Village-Akilpur, P.O. + P.S.-Akilpur, District Patna. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, Provident Fund Organisation, Road No.6, R. Block, Patna-1. 2. The Proprietor (Kear Nath Singh), Bajrangbali Cold Storage, Nasarigunj, P.O. Digha, District Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 12.8.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr Rama Shankar Pradhan, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1. The grievance of the petitioner is that while working in Bajrangbali Cold Storage, Nasarigunj, Patna, the contributions towards the provident fund from his salary had been deducted regularly and deposited with respondent no.1 and, as such, after his retirement from the Company in the month of March, 2008, he is entitled to have the refund of the provident fund dues, which have not been paid to him despite representation dated 16.11.2009. Mr. Pradhan, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 submits that the claim of the petitioner needs to be verified from the record. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Provident Fund Organisation, Road No.6, R. Block, 2 Patna (respondent no.1). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)