THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No. 28728 OF 2011 ORDER : 1. This Writ Petition is filed to declare the inaction of the respondents in considering the representation dated 06.09.2011 submitted by the petitioner to the first respondent, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. The case of the petitioner is that he constructed a residential building in an extent of 376.43 square meters of land situated in plot nos. 264 (part) and 264, forming part of survey no.125, Hafeezpet Village, Serilingampally Revenue Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, after obtaining necessary permission in proceedings No.G/428/BP/239/08, dated 19.3.2008 from the first respondent, and that as there is more than 10% deviation in the construction, he made the representation dated 06.09.2011 to the first respondent to inspect the building and allow him to pay penalty as per the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short, ‘the Act, 1955’), but no action is taken by the respondents on the said representation. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner gave a representation dated 06.09.2011 to the first respondent to inspect the building and allow him to pay penalties as per the Act, 1955, but no action has been taken thereon so far. 5. On the other hand, the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents contended that so far, no representation has been received by the respondent corporation from the petitioner so as to take further action in the matter. 6. The first respondent has to take appropriate decision in the matter under Section 455A of the Act, 1955. As it is stated that representation of the petitioner is not available with the first respondent, the petitioner can be given liberty to make a fresh representation in the matter and the first respondent can be directed to take appropriate decision thereon. 7. Therefore, the petitioner is given liberty to make a representation in the matter afresh to the first respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and in such a case, the first respondent is directed to take appropriate decision thereon within a period of four weeks from the date of receiving the representation from the petitioner in accordance with law strictly following the provisions of Section 455A of the Act, 1955 and communicate the same to the petitioner. 8. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 27.10.2011 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No. 28728 OF 2011 27.10.2011 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No. 28728 OF 2011 DATED 27.10.2011 Between: N.Jagadish …Petitioner And Dy. Municipal Commissioner, Circle 12, Serilingampally North Circle, GHMC & another …Respondents