// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5241/2008 Vishnu Nath Pathak S/o late Shri Brijnath Pathak Versus Civil Judge (Jr.Div.), Ajmer and Others Date of Order ::: 04.07.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Neeraj K. Tiwari, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Plaintiff-petitioner filed a suit for injunction against the defendant-respondent No.2 Smt. Ramdulari in the trial court. The dispute was in respect of the land bearing Khasra No.1853. The applicant-respondent No.3 Hiralal filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC to allow him to be impleaded as defendant in the suit on the ground that the land, in dispute, was initially in the name of Madari who sold the same to one Shri Suresh Sharma vide sale-deed dated 18th October, 1972. Subsequently, in a suit filed by Madari against Suresh Sharma, the sale-deed was cancelled and Madari became the owner of the same. He further contended that Madari executed a will on 03.06.2000 in respect of the land // 2 // bearing Khasra No.1853 in his favour. In these circumstances, the trial court allowed the application and directed that applicant Hiralal be impleaded as party in the suit. The said order has been challenged by the plaintiff in this writ petition. I have examined the reasons assigned by the trial court in the light of submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and, after considering the same, I find that the learned trial court has rightly allowed the applicant-respondent Hiralal to be impleaded as party in the present suit. I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in the impugned order so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//