1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No.453 of 2009 In Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.906 of 2007 In Writ Petition No.541 of 1993 (D) (Sudeshwar s/o Vishwanath Gotekar v. The Nagpur Municipal Corporation, through its Commissioner, and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for Appellant. Shri S.M. Puranik, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Coram : A.H. Joshi and A.R. Joshi, JJ. Dated : 11 th November, 2009 1. The learned Advocate for the appellant states that he has instructions to inform the Court that the appellant wants to withdraw Complaint (ULP) No.291 of 1986. He, however, states that it will be possible only if this Court partly allows the Letters Patent Appeal and sets aside impugned orders passed by learned Single Judge as well as order passed by Industrial Court. 2. Request is granted, and the judgment passed in Writ 2 Petition Nos.541 and 1044 of 1993 are set aside and the order of the Industrial Court in Complaint (ULP) No.291 of 1986 is set aside and the said Complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. It is clarified that the benefits, which the appellant or other officers have derived and received due to their long officiation, shall not be withdrawn or recovered from him. 4. Appeal is partly allowed in terms of paras 2 and 3 foregoing. 5. Parties shall bear own costs. Judge. Judge. pdl