Civil Revision No. 1041 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 1041 of 2010 Date of Decision: 5.7.2010 Satish Kumar Bhargav …Petitioner Versus Joginder Singh …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Sunil Chadha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raman Mahajan, Advocate for the respondent. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The petitioner was inducted as a tenant by Joginder Singh, respondent/landlord. The petitioner appeared in the witness box as RW.1 and in his cross-examination he admitted pamphlet (Annexure P1) and stated that Veena, his wife, had started a Beauty Parlour only for one month, which was closed thereafter. He further stated that now his wife is not carrying out any commercial activities in the demised premises. This admission and explanation, given in the cross- examination, is sought to be brought into the notice of the Court by amending the written statement, at belated stage. What is stated in the cross-examination can be considered by the trial Court at the time of arguments. Civil Revision No. 1041 of 2010 2 Needless to say that any admission made, during the cross- examination, is to be taken as a whole along with explanation. Therefore, there is no need to make an application for amendment of written statement to this effect. Rightly, the Appellate Authority has declined the application for amendment to the written statement. Proposed amendment was further seen as ploy by the tenant/petitioner to cause delay in culmination of ejectment proceedings. Hence, no interference is warranted in the present revision petition and the same is dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge July 5, 2010 “DK”