:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL (L) NO. 675 OF 2008 APPEAL (L) NO. 675 OF 2008 APPEAL (L) NO. 675 OF 2008 IN IN IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2498 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2498 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2498 OF 2008 IN IN IN SUIT NO. 3452 OF 2004 SUIT NO. 3452 OF 2004 SUIT NO. 3452 OF 2004 Reveira Institute of Education Pvt. Ltd. Pune ..Appellant versus Mantri Real Estates Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. M. S. Doctor i/b. M/s. B. Munim & Co. for the Appellant. Mr. Virendra Tulzapurkar with Mrs. C. S. Radia for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND S. A. BOBDE, J. S. A. BOBDE, J. S. A. BOBDE, J. DATE : 14TH NOVEMBER, 2008. DATE : 14TH NOVEMBER, 2008. DATE : 14TH NOVEMBER, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. We do not propose to interfere in the order impugned in the present Appeal. Suffice it to note that as a result of passing of the impugned order under challenge, the order dated 6.6.2007 has been set aside. Admittedly the Notice of Motion No. 2498 of 2008 is not dismissed by the impugned order. :2: The Notice of Motion No. 2116 of 2005 has been revived for hearing. All that has been done by the impugned order is the right of the respondent Nos. 2 to 5 in the present Appeal has been recognised to be heard and they have been impleaded as Defendant Nos. 2 to 5 in the suit. 3. In view of the above facts, we dispose of the Appeal with liberty to the Appellant to make a mention before the learned Single Judge for hearing and final disposal of the Notice of Motion. The interim protection granted by the learned Single Judge will be continued for a period of one week from today, within which period it should be mentioned and any further orders may be passed by the learned Single Judge in his own discretion. We make it clear that the observations made in the impugned order would not influence consideration of the Notice of Motion for appointment of the Receiver. With the above directions, the Appeal is disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE :3: S. A. BOBDE, J. S. A. BOBDE, J. S. A. BOBDE, J.