THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.25441 of 2009 DATED: 28.07.2010 Between: V. Ramaswamy .. Petitioner and The Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, Rep. by its Managing Director, Hyderabad, and others. .. Respondents ORDER: The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of respondents 1 and 2, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority and Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation respectively, in approving layout in respect of land in an extent of Ac.3.31 gts. in Sy.Nos.233, 234, 236 and 237 of Kowkur Village, Malkajgiri Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in favour of the 3rd respondent firm. It is the case of the petitioner that the 3rd respondent firm has no right or title over the said land of Ac.3.31 gts., but however, the respondent authorities, without verifying the facts, approved layout for the said land, along with the land of Ac.11.14 gts. originally purchased by the 3rd respondent. Whether the 3rd respondent has any right or title over the land in question and whether the respondents 1 and 2 erred in approving the layout for the said land in favour of the 3rd respondent, are the disputed questions of fact and they cannot be gone into in a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The remedy of the petitioner is to approach the competent Civil Court for redressal of his grievance. Hence, no orders much less the orders sought by the petitioner can be passed in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail the civil remedies available to him under law. No order as to costs. __________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 28th July, 2010 IBL