1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Civil application No. 4287/2007 in LPA St. No. 9649/2007 in Writ Petition No.312/2007 ( Amravati University, Amravati .vs. Raju Balkrishna Wankhede and another) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders ======================================= Mr. S.G. Loney, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. N.R. Saboo, Advocate, for Respondent no.1. Mr. A. M. Deshpande, AGP for Respondent no.2. .......... CORAM : K.J. ROHEE, & R.C. CHAVAN, JJ DATED : JANUARY 22, 2008 C.A. No. 4287/2007 1. Heard the counsel for the parties. 2. There appears sufficient cause for the delay. Hence the delay of 37 days in preferring LPA is hereby condoned. LPA St.No. 9649/2007 1. Heard the counsel for the parties. 2. By the Award dated 13.4.2006 the 2 Presiding Officer of the Labour Court, Amravati held that the termination of respondent no.1 was illegal. The Presiding Officer accordingly quashed the termination and directed the appellant to reinstate respondent no.1 on his present post with continuity of service and 25 % back wages. The learned Single Judge by his order dated 3.4.2007 while admitting the writ petition stayed the order of the Presiding Officer of Labour Court only in respect of payment of back wages that too on the condition that the appellant (petitioner therein) shall reinstate the respondent in accordance with the order of the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Amravati within a period of two months. It is thus obvious that it is merely an interim order. Hence we are not inclined to entertain the appeal. The same is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE halwai