K 1 (y? 5W wwxf; ‘ Mimi IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W P (S) No M94/COf 2010 Sohan Lal Sen S/o Shr1 Laljl Sen aged about 45 years Head Master, Government Primary School, Parsadakala,’ Block Fingeshwar, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) PETITIONER Versus RESPONDENTS :1/ The State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, School ‘ Education Department Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, G.E.Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITIO UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA m- 1 _,DAP’T‘TFI IT.APS,OF‘ ”FT—TF3 PETITIONER:— N :2) District Education Officer, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) :3) Alok Kumar Sharma, son of not known, Teacher Government Middle School, Patharra, Block Fingeshwar, District Raipur (C.G.) 7 >2 / mmwcswwwxow 200 mm (Wu) mmf‘aww ammm mmm . WWIEWW émt’fcmm g (SB: Hon’ue shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.) 23-08-2010 Shri K.S.Pawar, Advocate for th’e petitioner. Ms.'Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer fer the $tatelrespondents No.1 & 2 on advance copy. Heard. Grievance of the petitioner is that though the petitioner has preferred a representation aggrieved by supersession, the same has not been decided till date. Learned counsel appearin for the petitioner referred to the gradation list (Annexure P-1) ‘orn which it is found that the petitioner is placed over and a ove respondent No.3. It is also stated in the petition that the pet ioner holds qualification of M.A., a D.Ed. and also belongs to OBC tegory. lt is also been averred in the petition that the petitioner ha never been communicated with any adverse remark nor any De rtmentat Enquiry is pending and also he has not suffered any pun hment. ln view of the averments ade in the petition, it is revealed that junior to the petitioner has en promoted. On representation > H‘yvn ¥ nlcat-e him the basis for his supersession. Accordingly, this petition is linally disposed of with the direction that the respondent No.2 shall consider and take appropriate decision on petitio er’s tepresentation by speaking order within a period of three d onths from the date of receipt of copy of this order. lf grievance of the. petitio er lsnot redressed, it would be g open to the petitioner to tak recourse to sueh rémedy as ' available to him underthe law. . i Sd/— ‘ Manindra Mohan Shrivastiaitirail Judge ‘ ashok madelby the petitioner, the vre'iondems are under obligation to deeide the same and com W dim {whom Karaizizrl'q’ mlvS/i47w2/2mo -.1 ,oo,ooo. mm W200 arawm (Wu) WWW wmm WWW ‘ ‘ WW‘§W %W m W“