IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 7TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 16TH KARTHIKA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1295 of 2008(S) ---------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.754/1999 DATED 16/11/2007 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN O.P ------------------------------------------- C.K.RAJAPPAN CHETTIAR, S/O.KRISHNAN, AGED 62 YEARS, CHARGEMAN (RETD) KSRTC, ERATTUPETTA AND RESIDING AT IRATTAKALICKAL HOUSE, ANICOD WEST P.O., PALLIKKATHODE, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENT IN O.P ------------------------------------------------------ 1. SHRI.T.P.SENKUMAR, IPS, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SRI.T.P.BALAKRISHNAN, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KSRTC, ERATTUPETTA. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN, SC, KSRTC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/11/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Rs/ THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Cont.Case(C).No.1295 of 2008-S = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 7th day of November, 2008. JUDGMENT The petitioner's complaint is that the consequences which have to follow on the basis of the declarations and directions in the judgment, have not been worked out in terms of monies due to him by restoring benefits. When benefits are restored, if they result in monetary benefits, that have to necessarily follow. This is how the last sentence in the judgment is to be understood. The petitioner may make appropriate representation claiming the benefits so accrued on which the competent authority in the KSRTC will have to act. The situation in hand, as of now, cannot be treated as a wilful neglect or disobedience of the directions contained in the judgment inviting further proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act. This contempt of court COC1295/08 -: 2 :- case is hence closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to work out his remedies in accordance with law, including as aforesaid. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/