AGK IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT CONTEMPT CONTEMPT PETITION NO.60 OF 2008 PETITION NO.60 OF 2008 PETITION NO.60 OF 2008 Shri Bhagwan Haribhau Dixit ...Petitioner Versus. Shri Sayyad M.M. ...Respondent Mr. Viswasrao S. Deokar for the Petitioner. Mr. V.M.Kanade with Shri P.M.Huddar Respondent Nos.2 to 2H. Mr. A.I.Patel, A.G.P for the Respondent No.3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. : S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. : S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. DATE DATE DATE : 22nd April, 2008. : 22nd April, 2008. : 22nd April, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The petition is heard finally. Technically there is a violation of the order of the Tribunal dated 05th July, 2002 by which the respondent No.1 before the Tribunal i.e the Management was directed inter alia to promote the petitioner to the post of Superintendent with effect from 01st July, 2001 with difference in emoluments from the date of filing of appeal. 2. However, it appears that the concerned respondents were unable to unscramble the position in view of the various orders. There does not appear to have been a deliberate attempt at disobeying the order of the Tribunal. Mr Thorat, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Management fairly states that the order of the School Tribunal dated 05th July, 2002 will be implemented on or before 15th May, 2008. It is : 2 : 2 : 2 : clarified that even if formal paper work/orders are not completed by that date, the order shall be deemed to have been implemented. 3. Needless to add that the same shall be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties to the main petition. 4. In view of the above, the contempt proceedings before the School Tribunal shall stand withdrawn. Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed of.