IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4016 of 2007 HEMANT MOHAN PRASAD SINHA Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 03/ 05.03.2010 Mr. Alok Kumar No. 1 for the petitioner and Mr. Amish Kumar Jha, junior counsel to Mr. Kaushal Kumar Jha representing the Union of India are present. The writ petition has been filed for revision of pension in the pay-scale of Rs. 5000-8000 and other retiral benefits which have been fixed at a lower scale of Rs. 4000-6000. A counter affidavit was filed on behalf of the Union of India and in paragraph- 11 thereof it has been stated that the pension of the petitioner has been revised and fixed in pay-scale of Rs. 5000-8000 at a stage of Rs. 6,050/- per month. Evidence of the same has been placed at Annexure-A series to the counter affidavit. It is thus submitted that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that there are certain other dues which remains pending despite the position that the petitioner stood retired as back as on 28.2.2003. Having regard to the circumstances that the relief sought for by the petitioner has been redressed at the hands of the respondents, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and the same is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to raise his pending grievance before the 2 authority concerned who shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of three months of receipt of any such representation. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)