THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.710 OF 2011 29th October, 2011 BETWEEN: GOLLAVILLI SWAMYNAIDU .. PETITIONER AND GORLE GANESH RAMAKRISHNA AND ANOTHER .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.710 OF 2011 O R D E R : Rejection of an application by the revision petitioner in I.A.No.308 of 2010 in O.S.No.68 of 2009 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Chodavaram, to send the suit promissory note, Ex.A1 to an expert for comparison between the disputed signatures of the defendants and their admitted signatures, particularly with a view to ascertain the age of the ink in the disputed signatures and the age of writings in the body of the suit promissory note, having been rejected, is this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution preferred. The revision petitioners equivocally admitted execution of the suit promissory note by contending that the suit promissory note was fabricated by the respondent/plaintiff on the blank pronote furnished by them. The court below rejected the application stating that in the suit the respondent/plaintiff filed Ex.A1 the suit pronote and two witnesses signed the suit pronote apart from a scribe and since direct evidence is potentially available that would be sufficient to enable the court to come to a just conclusion on the veracity of the suit claim. The court below also recorded that no contemporaneous signatures of the petitioners/defendants at the time of the execution of suit pronote were furnished to enable a competent forensic comparison. This court discerns no error in the reasoning or exercise of discretion by the court below warranting interference under Article 227 of the Constitution. No merits in the revision. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 29th October, 2011. TNB THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.710 OF 2011 29TH September, 2011. tnb