IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 19TH JUNE 2008 / 29TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 5042 of 2005(A) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. SURESH, S/O.T.J.RAGHAVAN NAIR, "SUGUNANIVAS", EAST YAKKARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. PRAKASHAN, S/O.A.K.BALAKRISHNAN, PANCHAVADI, EAST YAKKARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANA KANNAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS (HR & CE), CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS (HR & CE), CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD. 3. MANAPPULLY BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM VELAGOSHA COMMITTEE-2005, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT BALU KENATH, EAST YAKKARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 4. EXECUTIVE OFFICER, MANAPPULLYKAVU DEVASWOM, EAST YAKKARA, PALAKKAD. 5. SIVANARAYANAN, EXECUTIVE MEMBER, MANAPPULLY BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM VELAGOSHA COMMITTEE-2005, EAST YAKKARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 6. MOHANDAS, EXECUTIVE MEMBER, MANAPPULLY BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM VELAGOSHA COMMITTEE-2005, EAST YAKKARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. WP(C).No. 5042 of 2005(A) 7. CHANDRAN, VICE PRESIDENT, MANAPPULLY BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM, VELAGOSHA COMMITTEE-2005, EAST YAKKARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 8. BALU KENATH, PRESIDENT, MANAPPULLY BHAGAVATHY DEVASWOM VELAGOSHA COMMITTEE-2005, EAST YAKKARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.) FOR R5TO R8 GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.R.LAKSHMINARAYANAN FOR R1 AND R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/06/2008, ALONG WITH W.P.(C).NOS.6053/2005 AND 6305/2005, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.Raman & T.R. Ramachandran Nair, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) Nos. 5042, 6053 & 6305 of 2005 - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 19th day of June, 2008. JUDGMENT Raman, J. All the above writ petitions relate to a festival in Manappully Bhagavathy Devaswom temple during April, 2005. By efflux of time, the matters have become infructuous. Therefore, the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. ( P.R.Raman, Judge.) (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/