wp8646.10 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8646 OF 2010 Anusayabai Devidas Pendur ...Petitioner Versus The Additional Collector, Nanded and Ors ...Respondents ..... Mr. M.V. Ghatge, advocate for the petitioner Mr. D.R. Korde, A.G.P. for respondents ..... CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 15TH DECEMBER, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2 It is not necessary to go into the details of the matter, since the ground No.2, which is raised in the petition is that the impugned order is passed without informing specific lapse and thereby the said authority has violated the principles of natural justice. Learned A.G.P. appearing for the respondents has no objection to remand this matter back to the respondent No.1 for fresh hearing. wp8646.10 -2- 3 In this view of the matter, the impugned order is quashed and set aside. The matter is remitted back to the respondent No.1 Additional Collector, Nanded for fresh consideration. Respondent No.1 after giving proper opportunity to the parties shall pass appropriate order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4 With the above observations, writ petition stands disposed of. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) rlj/