THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 8260 of 2009 Oral order: Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 belong to two different religions. They got married to each other, and they state that the parents of petitioner No.2 are threatening them, and it is their grievance that though they made representation to respondent No.1 requesting him to provide protection, no action thereon had been taken. Hence, he seeks appropriate directions. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on instructions submitted that the petitioners have made representation to respondent No.1, who is not the proper authority, and that if they make appropriate representation to respondent No.2, who is the proper authority, he will consider the request of the petitioners. In view of the above stand taken by the respondents, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: The petitioners are directed to approach respondent No.2 by way of appropriate representation requesting him to provide security to their person, and if any such representation is made, respondent No.2 shall consider the same and take appropriate steps to provide security to the petitioners. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 30th April, 2009 KSR