IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 6TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 15TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 32707 of 2008(R) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- THANU BALAN, S/O.SUKUMARAN, AGED 43, EZHAVIKODE PUTHEN VEEDU, KEEZHAMPALLI LANE, TOLL GATE ROAD, VADUTHALA, COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANILAL SRI.S.NIDHEESH RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT COCHIN, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHERANELLORE VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM. 3. L.MUTHUSWAMY, RADHA NIVAS, TOLL GATE ROAD, VADUTHALA, CHERANELLORE VILLAGE, COCHIN. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.32707 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 6th November, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner who is residing in a land having an extent of 2 cents, is aggrieved by the danger caused by an overhanging coconut trees situated in the adjacent property of the 3rd respondent. Petitioner refers to Exhibit-P2 report, which according to him justifies, his apprehension. He has filed Exhibit-P1 application before the Revenue Divisional Officer invoking the power under Section 133 of the Cr.P.C. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to proceed with Exhibit-P1 and take appropriate decision, after issuing notice to the 3rd respondent also. Needful shall be done within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma 2 3