R.S.A. No. 3804 of 2007 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A. No. 3804 of 2007 (O&M) Date of decision : 13.8.2010 ... Paramjit Kaur and another ................Appellants vs. Nachhatar Singh .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. N.S. Dandiwal, Advocate for the appellants Sh. Binderjit Singh, Advocate for the respondent. ... K.C. Puri, J. This is a regular second appeal preferred by Paramjit Kaur and Jaspreet Singh (minor)- appellants, against the judgment dated 13.9.2007 passed by Sh. J.S. Klar, Additional District Judge, Bathinda and judgment dated 7.11.2006 passed by Sh. N.K. Gaur, Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bathinda. Paramjit Kaur – appellant is present in person in the Court and has been identified by her counsel Sh. N.S. Dandiwal, Advocate. Nachhattar Singh – respondent is also present in person in the Court and has been identified by his counsel Sh. Binderjit Singh, R.S.A. No. 3804 of 2007 -2- Advocate. With the intervention of Mediation and Reconciliation Centre, the parties have arrived at a compromise. The compromise has been placed on record as Exhibit C-X. Counsel for the appellants has moved an application for allowing the compromise on behalf of minor. The compromise is for the benefit of the minor. So, the said application stands allowed. Compromise is taken on record. Parties have stated at the Bar that in paragraph No. 1 of the Settlement Agreement, the holding of respondent has been mentioned as 78 kanals, but in fact he owns 53 kanals as per revenue record. Parties have further stated that instead of Paramjit Kaur-appellant No.1, Jaspreet Singh (minor) – appellant No.2 be held owner of 1/3rd share in the holding of Nachattar Singh-respondent, as mentioned in paragraph No.1 of the Settlement Agreement. So, in these circumstances, with the abovesaid modification, the appeal stands disposed of in terms of Settlement Agreement Exhibit C-X. The holding of Nachattar Singh-respondent shall be held to be 53 kanals and Jaspreet Singh is held to be owner of 1/3rd share of the holding of Nachattar Singh. The other terms remain the same as per Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement with the abovesaid modification shall be a part of the decree. Decree sheet be prepared. ( K.C. Puri ) 13.8.2010 Judge chugh