IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated 21.2.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.2398 of 2011 A.Vajeullah. ... Petitioner -Vs.- 1.The Executive Engineer, (Operation and Maintenance) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Ranipet, Vellore District. 2.The Assistant Engineer, (Operation and Maintenance) Urban-II, Ranipet, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Ranipet, Vellore District. 3.The Divisional Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Ranipet, Vellore District. ... Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to complete the duly sanctioned shifting work of HT Power line against cost, vide Ref:Sanc.No.SE/Vellore/14-696/S.052/2009-10 dated 28.10.2009 at Ranipet, Vellore District since there is no subsisting injunction order by any court against the respondents from completing the said work left half-way-through, in a time bound manner. For petitioner : Mr.M.Balasubramanian For respondents : Mr.P.Srinivas O R D E R Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to complete the duly sanctioned shifting work of HT Power line against cost, vide Ref:Sanc.No.SE/Vellore/14- 696/S.052/2009-10 dated 28.10.2009 at Ranipet, Vellore District since https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ there is no subsisting injunction order by any court against the respondents from completing the said work left half-way-through, in a time bound manner. 2. Mr.P.Srinivas, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents electricity board. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. Petitioner made a representation dated 19.7.2010 to the first respondent for shifting of H.T. Power line on payment of cost. Sri P.Srinivas, learned counsel appearing for the respondents on instruction states that some amount has been paid and the work will be completed in accordance with law. He, further, states that there is some objection from some quarters and the respondents are not able to proceed further. He, however, states that the authorities will take suitable suitable steps in this regard by seeking proper police protection, if necessary. 4. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents electricity board, the authorities are directed to consider and dispose of the representation dated 19.7.2010 in a time bound manner. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- Asst. Registrar //true copy// Sub Asst.Registrar ts To 1.The Executive Engineer, (Operation and Maintenance) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Ranipet, Vellore District. 2.The Assistant Engineer, (Operation and Maintenance) Urban-II, Ranipet, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Ranipet, Vellore District. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The Divisional Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Ranipet, Vellore District. 1 cc to Mr.P.Srinivas, Advocate, Sr.No.12907 1 cc to Mr.M.Balasubramanian, Advocate, Sr.No.12347 Order in W.P.No.2398 of 2011 SAI {CO} TP/7.3.2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/