1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATEJURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6590 OF 2011 Sambhaji Bhagwat Bhopale & Others ...Petitioners Versus Dhanraj Aratmal Pamnani & Others ...Respondents Mr.S.G.Karandikar for the Petitioner CORAM:- R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED:- 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard learned Advocate for the petitioners. The petitioners are defendants in Special Civil Suit No.46 of 2007 in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Solapur. The stand of the petitioners that the document on the basis of which the suit came to be filed is inadequately stamped, was accepted by the learned trial Judge and order was passed on 18.11.2009 as per the provisions of law so that appropriate stamp duty is recovered from the respondents. After the procedure was followed and deficit stamp duty was paid, the petitioners filed in the aforesaid court application at Exhibit 33 2 contending that the order passed by the Office of the Superintendent of Stamp is not correct and improper stamp duty has been paid. This application was rejected by the learned trial Judge by order dated 23.3.2011. 2. A perusal of the said order, if read in proper perspective would go to show that the learned trial Judge has observed that if the petitioners have any grievance about the order passed by the Superintendent of Stamps, the said question can be agitated before the appropriate authority and the said question cannot be raised in the present suit. After having read the order and having understood the purport of the said order, I am inclined to observe that no interference is required by this Court. Once it is observed that the respondents have paid the stamp duty as per the order passed by the Superintendent of Stamps, they can’t be blamed. Hence following order is passed to dismiss the petition. ORDER Petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)