IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-25803 of 2009 Date of decision : October 07, 2009 Pargat Singh ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ....Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. SS Godara, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Sidharth Sarup, AAG Haryana L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) Pargat Singh has filed this petition for anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 67 dated 19.2.2009 under sections 420, 467, 471, 120-B IPC, Police Station Rattia, District Fatehabad. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. Complainant Amar Singh and his sister Gurdev Kaur were owners of land mentioned in the FIR. Sale deed dated 31.1.2006 of the said land was executed in favour of petitioner's co-accused Amarphal by impersonation of complainant and his sister. Petitioner is one of the attesting witness of the sale deed. The petitioner identified the impostors to be the complainant and his sister at the time of execution of the sale deed. Criminal Misc. No. M-25803 of 2009 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner himself disclosed the transaction to the complainant and his sister as mentioned in the FIR itself. However, the admitted fact remains that the petitioner is witness of the sale deed and he wrongly identified the impostors to be the vendors i.e. complainant and his sister. Resultantly, the complainant and his sister were deprived of their land and have to enter into litigation to get back their land. The sale deed was executed for Rs 26,29,000/-. In view of the aforesaid but without meaning to express any opinion on merits, the petitioner does not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail. Dismissed. ( L.N. Mittal ) October 07, 2009 Judge 'dalbir'