IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 29TH JULY 2010 / 7TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 9268 of 2010(G) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- ELIZABETH THOMAS, KAVILTHAZHA, KAKKAMTHODU, CHANGANASSERY, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.JOMY GEORGE, SRI.SEBASTIAN THOMAS, SRI. P. REJINARK. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. VILLAGE OFFICER, KAVALAM. 2. THASILDAR, KUTTANADU, ALAPPUZHA. 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA. 4. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA. 5. MRS.P.S.SHEEBA, W/O.GOPAKUMAR, THAYIL HOUSE, CHERUKARA, KAVALAM P.O, 6. SECRETARY, COMMERCIAL TAXES, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 7. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R4, R6 & R7 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. V.K. SHAMSUDEEN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/07/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.9268/2010-G: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.742/95. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO. 2912/95. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DTD. 04/12/2003. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD. 18/09/2009 FILED BEFORE THE R.2. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE R.1. DTD. 26/09/2009. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= W.P.(C) No. 9268 of 2010 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= Dated this the 29th day of July, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:- a) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents 1 to 4 to lift the attachment over the petitioner's property covered by Exhibits P1 and P2 and to stop all further proceedings pursuant to the attachment over the petitioner's property. b) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents 1 to 4 to enquire into Exhibit P4 petition filed by the petitioner and to take a decision before proceeding further against the property owned and possessed by the petitioner. c) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents 1 to 4 to drop all further proceedings against the petitioner's property covered by Exhibits P1 and P2. d) to grant such reliefs which this Honourable Court deem just and proper to facts and circumstances of the case. W.P.(C) No. 9268/2010 2 2. The learned Government Pleader, with reference to the averments contained in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondents 1 to 3, submits that no steps are intended or being pursued against the property of the petitioner. The above submission is recorded and the writ petition is disposed of. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. mn.