1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 106 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3376 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.106 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr M.K.Shukla, for the appellants. Mr R.V.Govilkar, for respondent no.1A. Mr P.G.Lad for respondent nos 2 and 3. Mr Ashutosh Shukla for respondent nos 4 and 5. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 29/09/2010. PC: Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the appellant,- i.e. Original defendant no.3, on instructions, submits that the appellants had simply followed the instructions issued by the MHADA for putting defendant no.4 in possession of the suit flat. In other words, he submits that the appellants did not commit any illegality in putting defendant no.4 in possession of T 2 the suit flat. He made such statement on the basis of a list of occupants certified by the MHADA. Mr Lad,learned counsel appearing for the MHADA, does not dispute the list duly certified by them. In view thereof, the learned counsel for the appellant does not press this appeal. The appeal is accordingly disposed of as not pressed. The civil application also stands disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)