IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 28TH BHADRA 1929 WP(C).No. 27776 of 2007(F) ------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: -------------------- 1. M. ABDUL RASHEED, RASHEED MANZIL, KAVUMOOLA, KARIPUR P.O., NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. (DRIVER, KSRTC DEPOT, NEDUMANGAD - RETIRED ON 31-05-2005). 2. G. SASIDHARAN, SAVITHRI BHAVAN, CHERIYAPLAVILA,KOTTAKKAKOM P.O. ARYANAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. (DRIVER, KSRTC DEPOT, NEDUMANGAD - RETIRED ON 30-09-2002). 3. K. VEERABHADRAN PILLAI, VILAYIL VEEDU, ERIYANAD, PANAVOOR P.O.,NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. (DRIVER, KSRTC DEPOT, NEDUMANGAD - RETIRED ON 30-04-2004). BY ADV. SRI.ANANDARAJAN.N SRI.K.K.MANGALANANDAN RESPONDENTS: -------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23. (WPC NO.27776/07 F) 2. THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR & CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, K.S.R.T.C.TRANSPORT BHAVAN FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23. 3. THE ASSISTANT PERSONNEL OFFICER(PENSION) K.S.R.T.C., TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23. 4. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, K.S.R.T.C., NEDUMANGAD. BY ADV. SHRI K. PRABHAKARAN, SC, KSRTC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.C. NO. 27776 OF 2007 F -------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th September, 2007 JUDGMENT Complaint of the petitioners, who are retired Drivers of the respondent Corporation is that they had worked on daily wages on appointment through Employment Exchange. According to them, Ext.P9 order has been issued for counting the provisional daily wage service for pensionary benefits. But, their provisional service is not counted along with their regular service for pensionary benefits. This is their case. I heard the learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondsent Corporation also. Petitioners have preferred Exts.P10, P11 and P12 representations. I feel that a decision should be taken on the same. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider and take a decision on Exts.P10, P11 and P12 in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of this Judgment. Any amounts the petitioners are found entitled to by applying WP(C) NO.27776/07 F 2 Ext.P9 in respect of their monthly pension and arrears of pension will be disbursed to them within a period of two months from the date of the decision on Exts.P10, P11 and P12. K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk.