IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.112 of 2000 M/S K.C.C. Corporation, Dugar House, 9 Princep Street Culcutta-72, through its Branch Manager, namely, Balram Kumar Singh, son of Sri Amar Singh, Branch Office, Patna, 193, East Ashok Nagar, Road No.14, P.S. Kankarbagh, Patna -20 ----- Respondent no.4/Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Rural Development, State of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 3. The Joint Secretary, Department of Rural Development State of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 4. The Addl. Commissioner, Department of Rural Development, State of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. ---- Respondents/Respondents. 5. M/S Graph Line Computers Pvt. Ltd. Arya Kumar Road, Machhua Toli, Patna-4, through its Managing Director, Deneshwar Prasad Sinha, resident of Road No.1, New Yarpur, P.S. Gardanibagh, in the town and district at Patna ---- Petitioner/Respondent 2nd Set. ----------- 7. 1.12.2010 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Heard Mr. Satish Kumar Sinha, learned Assistant Counsel to Additional Advocate General No.4 for opposite party nos. 1 to 4, and Mr. Shailendra Kumar Sinha for opposite party no.5. This application has been filed by respondent no.4 of C.W.J.C. No.7774 of 1999 ( M/S Graphline Computer Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar & Others), for review and/or recall of the order dated 1.3.2000, whereby the writ petition was dismissed. It 2 was, inter alia, held that the writ petitioner (opposite party no.5 herein) was qualified to bag the contract, whereas opposite party no.4 therein (the petitioner herein) was not within the zone of consideration and, therefore, had no locus standi to challenge the impugned decision. It appears on a perusal of the record and on a consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the opposite parties that no case for interference within the narrow confines of review jurisdiction is made out. This application is accordingly dismissed. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar ,J. )