IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 19340 of 2000 Between: R.R.Srinivasa Rao S/o.Raghupathi Rao O/o.Mother Dairy, Hayathnagar Rangareddy District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of A.P., rep.by its Secretary Finance and Planning Department Secretariat, Buildings Hyderabad 2 The State of A.P., rep.by its Secretary Agriculture Department Secretariat, Buildings Hyderabad 3 The A.P.Dairy Development Corporation Federation Limited, rep.by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Lalapet, Hyderabad 4 The Mother Dairy rep.by its General Manager Hayathnagar, Rangareddy Dist 5 The State of A.P. rep.by its Secretary Legislative Affairs, Secretariat, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the Act 27/1998 issued by the 5th respondent is illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to the orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and further direct the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner in which post he is working from the date of his initial appointment. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 5 : G.P. for Finance & Planning Counsel for the Respondents 3 & 4: Mr.N. Rajeswara Rao. The Court made the following ORDER (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice J. Chelameswar): The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition, as it was already held by this Court in earlier proceedings that such a writ petition is not maintainable as against the third respondent- A.P. Dairy Development Corporation Federation Limited, with liberty to the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings as he is advised for agitating his rights which are pleaded before this Court. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as ‘not pressed’ with a liberty to the petitioner, as prayed for. No costs. _______________ J. CHELAMESWAR, J ________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 7th October, 2004 Note: Issue CC in one week B/o. isn To 1. The Secretary, The State of AP., Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. The Secretary, The State of A.P., Agricultural Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 3. The Vice Chairman and Managing Director, The A.P. Dairy Development Corporation Federation Ltd., Lalapet, Hyderabad. 4. The General Manager, The Mother Dairy, Hayathnagar Ranga Reddy District. 5 The Secretary, The State of AP., Legislative Affairs, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 6. Two CCs to G.P. for Finance & Planning, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 7. Two CD copies.