IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 10TH JANUARY 2011 / 20TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 716 of 2011(L) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. DR.DHAWAN M.S, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.N.SUNDARESAN,CHARUVILA VEEDU, NELLIPPALLY PO, PUNALUR,KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. MRS.RAKHI DHAWAN, AGED 23 YEARS D/O.RAMACHANDRAN, THRAYAMBAKAM, NELLIPPALLY PO, PUNALUR,KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.A.MOHAMMED SHAH RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- MARRIAGE OFFICER CUM SUB REGISTRAR PUNALUR, PUNALUR PO, KOLLAM DISTRICT POIN 691 305. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 716 of 2011 L ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 10th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The relief sought in the writ petition is to register the marriage of the petitioners dispensing with the notice period provided under the Special Marriage Act. This issue is fully covered against the petitioners by virtue of the Division Bench judgment in Deepak Krishna Vs. District Registrar [2007 (3) KLT 570]. In that view of the matter, the relief sought for cannot be granted to the petitioner. Writ petition fails and it is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks