IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9250 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 19, 2010. Gurpreet Kaur and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.K.S.Sidhu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.K.S.Sidhu, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of the order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to seek any counter-reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioners applied for selection to the posts of ETT Teachers (Teaching Fellows) in General/Ex-servicemen categories and pursuant to their selection, they were appointed as such. However, their services have been allegedly terminated by respondent No.2, inter-alia, on the plea that the petitioners had produced `bogus experience certificates' to C.W.P.No .9250 of 2010 2 secure their appointments. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this case has already been settled by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.11111 of 2009 (Parminder Kaur versus State of Punjab and others), decided on 18.3.2010. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and considering the assertions made on their behalf and the reasons assigned in the cited decision, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction that let the petitioners represent to the authorities alongwith the material in support of their plea that the `experience certificates' relied upon by them are genuine and/or they are otherwise entitled to be given appointments as per merit. The said representation(s), if any, shall be considered and dispose of by respondent No.2 in the light of the observations made in Parminder Kaur's case (supra), within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 19, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE