(1) CRI.APP. 3357.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3357 OF 2010 Rupak S/o Keshavrao Jondhale .. Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and anr. .. Respondents Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. N.H. Borade, APP for the respondent-State ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 14TH SEPTEMBER, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. Heard. 2. The application is based on the averment that the applicant had purchased vehicle in the name of the informant. It is alleged that the informant Akhil Abdul Jabbar lodged false FIR by taking undue advantage of the fact that the vehicles were registered in his name. It appears that a Wagon-R car vehicle and TVS Scooty were standing in the name of the informant and were being used by him. (2) CRI.APP. 3357.2010 3. At this juncture such benami transaction cannot be inferred to and on such ground the FIR cannot be termed as false one. The defence of the applicant cannot be considered as foundation for quashing of the FIR at the premature stage. 4. The learned Advocate submits that chargesheet is filed and therefore he is also seeking quashing of the chargesheet. As stated before, the entire Application is based on the probable defence available to the applicant which cannot be examined without the trial. Application dismissed. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp