BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 1C.G.[ W. P.(S)§C/"i’ Oz 2008 (Single Bench/Serwce Matter) / S. J. KURVEY Aged about 56 years S/o Late Shri Jay Klishna Kurvey Assistant Grade H Office of Assistant Engineer, Public Health Engineering, E & M Sub-Division, DURG (CG) VERSUS we“ H STATE OF CHHATTISGAR Through - Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering PETITIONER Department, Govt. of CG. Secretariat D.K.S. Bhawan Raigur 1C.G.! Shri S‘Ri Dewangan Assistant Grade II Office of Executive Engineer Electrical & Mechanical Public Health Department, Kamla College, KonriIiBliata Rajnandgaon. %§\§ ‘ k A // // % ‘ WGH COUR'F OF CHHAT'HSGH AT B§LASPUR {Ham Mr. Justése Prétmker Qiwakei’) Writ Pewmn {3) N0. 394G of 26% EEHTEGNER S.J. Kurvey VERSUS RESPONQENTS State of Chhattfsgarh and another. Shri V.G. Tamaskar counse for the petitioner. Ku. Sunita Jain PL for the respondents/State. G8.07.2009) With the consené of the counsel for the parties, the matter is heard hnany‘ I Charlenge in the instant petition is to the order dated 07.07.2008 (Annexure P~5) passed by respondent No.1 whereby the petitioner was ansferred from PWD Sub Division Durg to PWD Sub Division Rajnandgaon, in vioiation of the transfer policy. This petition was tied on 21.7.2008 and the stay was granted in favour of the petitioner vide order dated 23.7.2008. Contention of the counsei for the parties is that this Court may quash the impugned transfer order by giving iiberty to the respondents to pass fresh order if administrative exigenoy so warrants. in View of the submissions of the counsel for the respective parties and iooking to the fact that the petition. was filed on 21.7.2008 and stay was granted in favour of the petitioner vide order dated 2312008, the impugned order dated 7.7.2008 so far as it reiates to the petitioner is hereby quashed. Howaver, the respondents shall be free to pass the order afresh if administrative exigency necessitates the same. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. . . r Sd/- 7 i7 V — 'IL" Pritinker Diwaker Judge l WRHT PETIHON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTlON OF lNDlA ( 0 R D ER tr l