IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 28TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 4194 of 2010(Y) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- GIRISHKUMAR.C., S/O.CHANDU, AGED 34 YEARS, CHOLAPPURATH HOUSE, EAST HILL ROAD, WEST HILL, ELATHUR, CALICUT. BY ADV. SRI.KRISHNADAS P. NAIR SMT.K.L.SREEKALA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF CALICUT, CORPORATION OFFICE, CALICUT-32. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CORPORATION OF CALICUT, CORPORATION OFFICE, CALICUT-32. 3. THE HEALTH OFFICER (INSPECTION), CORPORATION OF CALICUT, CORPORATION OFFICE, CALICUT-32. ADV. SRI.K.D.BABU,SC,KOZHIKODE CORPORATION FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.4194 OF 2010 (Y) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is conducting a hotel and Bakery business in building No.1/3206. Ext.P8 communication was issued by the first respondent calling upon the petitioner to close down his business establishments for the reason that he did not have any licence. He filed Ext.P10, which was rejected by Ext.P11. Again he filed Ext.P12 requesting that he may be heard and fresh orders may be passed in the matter. Accordingly, the matter was considered and by Ext.P13 order was passed, by which his request was again rejected. It is challenging Exts.P11 and P13 that this writ petition is filed. 2. However, when the writ petition came up for admission it was noticed that the order rejecting the appeal is one revisable by the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions. In view of this, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open the petitioner to seek revisional remedies. As the petitioner's business establishment is a running establishment, it is directed that in order to enable the petitioner to seek interim orders, the WPC.No. 4194/2010 :2 : impugned orders will be kept in abeyance for 2 weeks from today and in the meantime it is up to the petitioner to seek appropriate orders protecting his interest. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/