1 wp2490 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2490 OF 2011 The Jewel Premises Co-op Soc.Ltd. ...Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra through the Department of Co-operation & others ...Respondents Mr.H.S.Murthy i/b Mr.B.A.Mahendra for the Petitioner Ms Neha Palshikar-Bhide, A.G.P for the respondent nos.1 to 3. Mr.U.P.Warunjikar a/w Mr.Munif Verges i/b DSK Legal for respondent nos.5 to 7 CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 19, 2011 P.C.: It is not in dispute that the petitioner-society is now represented by an Administrator. The learned A.G.P states that Mr.Deepak Khandekar, the Administrator of the Petitioner- Jewel Premises Co- op society Ltd. is personally present in the Court and he states that he does not desire to prosecute this petition. 2 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it may be clarified that the members of the petitioner-society are at liberty to challenge the impugned order. However, this issue need not be gone into in this petition, as the learned counsel for the petitioner now cannot represent the petitioner- society and that the Administrator has made a statement that he does not want to prosecute the 2 wp2490 petition. 3 Hence, in view of the statement of the Administrator of the petitioner-society, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. JUDGE