1 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3023 of 2008 Mr.Baban Nanasaheb Godase .. Petitioner versus Shivaji Dadaji Godase & ors. .. Respondents ... Mr.Dilip Bodake for the petitioner. Mr.Vishwanath Talkute for the respondent nos.1 - 3. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 25th July 2008 P.C.: 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. The contesting respondents through their counsel assure that the construction to be put up by them on the disputed property may be made subject to the outcome of the suit and that the respondents shall not claim any equities at a later point of time or ask for reimbursement of costs incurred by the 2 respondents coupled with the undertaking of the respondents that they shall make good any loss to the petitioner if and when ordered by the trial court at the final hearing. The undertaking given on behalf of the Respondents is accepted. This undertaking in the above terms is more than sufficient to protect the interest of the petitioner. As a result, no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is required. Petition is disposed of. 3. It will be open to the parties to request the trial court for expeditious hearing of the suit which request may be considered on its own merits. Photographs handed in to the court on the earlier occasion is returned to advocate for the respondent (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)