IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20760 of 2011 Prabhat Kumar Versus Renu Kumari ---------------------------------- 3. 09.12.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the husband petitioner against the order dated 26.9.2011 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Newada in Matrimonial Case No. 126 of 2008 whereby the learned court below directed the husband petitioner to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.2000/- and Rs.2000/- as litigation cost. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is unemployed and, therefore, he has got no income. From perusal of the impugned order it appears that the learned court below considered the case of the wife and the husband and also considered the submissions of the petitioner which are being raised before this court and, thereafter directed the petitioner to pay the said amount. In such view of the matter, in my opinion, the amount of Rs.2000/- is reasonable amount and, therefore, in supervisory jurisdiction the quantum fixed by the court below cannot be interfered with as there is no jurisdictional error. Thus, this writ application is dismissed. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)