Civil Revision No.4415 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No.4415 of 2010 Date of Decision: 19.7.2010 Sudesh Mohini Kapoor and Others …Petitioners Versus Smt. Geeta Anand and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Jainainder Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Petitioner No.1/defendant to the suit had gifted the suit property to her two sons to the exclusion of two daughters. The daughters instituted a suit stating that the mother was only a name lender and the suit property belonged to their father. Before the suit could proceed, an amendment was sought, to plead that the instalments of the loan were also paid by the grand father. Therefore, the property is ancestral in nature also. The Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chandigarh, vide its order dated 20.3.2010 (Annexure P5), allowed the amendment. In the present petition, the petitioners have impugned order dated 20.3.2010. Since the amendment was introduced at very early stage, no interference is warranted in the present revision petition as the impugned order, passed by the trial Court, is just and appropriate, Civil Revision No.4415 of 2010 2 considering the fact that the amendment shall save the parties from multiplicity of the suits. Hence, the present revision petition is hereby dismissed, in limine. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge July 19, 2010 “DK”