:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3527 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO. 3527 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO. 3527 OF 2008 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1776 OF SUIT NO. 1776 OF SUIT NO. 1776 OF 2003 2003 2003 Gobindram Harumal Ahuja. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Shri Ratan Irani & Ors. ... Defendants. Mr. P. Haindaday for the Plaintiff. Mr. C. Shah for Defendant No.3. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 12TH 12TH 12TH FEBRUARY 2009. FEBRUARY 2009. FEBRUARY 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . It is not necessary to pass any orders on this Notice of Motion because what I noticed from the record is that the written statement is filed by Defendant No.1. That written statement filed dated 21st October 2008 is under objection. The written statement is only filed by Defendant No.1 and there is no written statement on behalf of Defendant No.2. 2. In these circumstances, the matter can be placed for ex-parte decree against Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 and at the request of Mr. Haindaday, place on 4th March 2009. The Plaintiff to file original documents alongwith list. Needless to state that if the decree is passed, the Court will make appropriate orders with regard to withdrawal of the amounts deposited in the Court. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)