^ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH Y. BILASPUR. First Appeal No. 77 /2006 . Appellant/ / ^Defendant ySmt. Mamta Thakur, AGE 40 W/o Lok Singh Thakur R/o Kailash Gali, Turi Hatri, Purani Basti, Raipur VERSUS lent^. Lok Singh Thakur, Age 43 Yrs, Plaintiff S/o Late Raghunandan Singh Thakur R/o Raipura, Mahadev Ghat Road, Raipur Appeal Under Section 19 of Family Courts Act, 1984. J^-:'- XI-HC-78 3=oET •^|^ld<4, ^TTl^jl<o, f®l<ril<rl^< F,^^.'7^)/6^ <TTR<tl Sb*1|ch ^ 200 STT^TCRR? (^t3^T) ^ ? o6 ^- W^T^Tf^TW cTSTT3T1^T$h^ich| 5^TTW ^N ^TT^T cbl^td41-l ^TR^ff ^f fe^ <i^^l< ^^f^T3:n^T DB, : HON'BLE MR. DHlrtEENDRA MISHRA AND HON'BLE MR. SATlt >H K. AGNiHOTRS. JJ. /;.."'• ^"""•••"^ V, ,J 25-8-2006 Mr. Raja Sharma, counsel flc The appellant has preferre^ Famjly Courts Act, 1984 againsttl"|( by which a sum of Rs.1,000/- by| sum of Rs.2,000/- by way of cost favour ofthe appellant. However, learned counsel this appea! with liberty to fite appi) the Jaw on fhe ground that the inst| The appea! is dismissed prayed for. Learned counsel for the a{ copyofthe impugned orderfiJed al The office is directed to jmpugned order on appellant fur same. Certifjed copy as per rules. sr the appellant. thjs appeal under Section 19 ofthe e impugned order dated 10-1-20(^, way of jnterim maintenance and a of (itjgation have been awarded jn for the appellant seeks to wlthdraw lopriate proceeding available under int appea! is not maintainab!e. |as withdrawn with the liberty as |pe!Iant prays for return of certified ^ngwith the appeal. return the certified copy of the |iishjng authenticated copy of the Gopat Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge i Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge P.T.O.