L rf fF .p COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CHHATTISGARH f 7 3^/ <JJ1lo 5_o o 1 PETITIONER - MS. MANILAL DAYALJI & COMPANY - CHARAMA, DISTT.: BASTAR, CHHATTISGARH, A FIRM REGISTERED UNDER THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, WITH ITS HEAD OFFICE AT SADARBAZAR, DHAMTARI. REPRESENTED BY THE PARTNER - SHRI RAJESH KUMAR MIRANI S/o. SHRI MANBLAL H MIRANI, SADAR BAZAR - DHAMTARI CHHATTISGARH. » VERSUS RESPONDENTS - (1) STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. l^. (2) THE LABOUR INSPECTOR, BLOCK - DUR.GUKONDAL REGION. DISTT. : BASTAR, CHHATTISGARH. (3) THE PRESIDmG OFFICER, LABOUR COURT - JAGDALPUR / THE AUTHORITY, UNDER THE PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT / THE AUTHORITY UNDER THE MINIMUM WAGES ACT, DISTT.:BASTAR - JAGDALPUR (CHHATTISGARH) K PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF WDIA.^flf} ^.^.J^ *•—* •• ^—— -- _ - • • \ ^»f***> tnA .**' HGJ1COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR RiT PETSTiON N0.1735 OF 200- iONER RESPONDEN ?A's Manila! DavaSii & ComDanv Versus State of Chhatiisgarh & Others ;Writ Pstltion undsr Articie 225/227 ofths Constitution of tndia) Siny!e Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish ^. Agnshotri, J. rTessnt :• None for the petitsoner. Shri N.N. Roy, PL for the State. ORDER i'ORAU (Passed on thte 23rd day of October, 2009) The mattsr is caiied for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor is any reDresentation made on behalf of the oefitioner. The petitionsr may not be interested in the matter. 2) In view of the above. the writ prosecution. ition is dismlssed for want of Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge