te •<a» IN THB I-IIGH COURT OB' CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.5-S4 ^ /2005 -PETITIONER Laxmi Prathamik Sahkari >'^%^ \(>')^y. 4%" ^^ ^.^ ^^ ^- RESPONDENTS /" Upbhokta Bhandar Limited Arjun Nagar, Ward No. 19 CampO-1, Bhilai Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) through its President Vinod Kumar Agrawal, son of Shri Roshan Lal Agrawal, aged about 38 years, resident of Ward No. 19, Arjun Nagar, Camp-1, Bhilai, Tah and 'distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS 1,Z State of Chhattisgarh, through - the Principal Secretary, Office of the Chief Minister, Sfcate of Chhattisgarh, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur (CG) 2. The State of Chhattisgarh, through - the Secretary, Department of Civil Supplies, Mantralay D.K.S; Bhawan, Raipur 3. Confcroller of Food, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 4. Collector (Food), Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, • The Petitioner respectfully submifcs as under: - (D XI-HC-22 ^I^C-II gb*<icb 3^ ^I^Krl^j, ^Tfl^41<o, fa^W^< 311^1 ^5icn ^.^.^.o...3.S:^ ,,,^ 3TI^T^T R'li<=b3TT^T ^RT^^fgcT |((|Ni|llffllffl »«' ^^l Barve ^y ^ 9 Osi' v ^c' 3T1^T?^TTW:^?cr 5-8-2005 Shri Anil Pandey, counsel fc| <=bi^f<n^^ *4i^<nT^teT^t<Ri^i< ^3Tf^"R"3:n^T r the petitioner. Shri Sandeep Dubey, ^ovt. Advocate for the State/ respondents. Heard both the counsel. The maih grievance of the ^etitioner in this petition is that the petitioner appiied for allotment of -riie fair price shop and thereafter the petitioner made a representa|t'ion even after decision is not being taken. It is not a case where th^ and that is being challenged. consideration of respondent No,4 Shri Dubey, learned coun^ the policy in question has alread^ the matter is pending before the] In yiew of the above fact the same is dismissed. respondents have taken a decision So far, apptications are under and pending decision. el for respondents submitted that been challenged before this Court, Hon'ble Division Bench for decision ond in that, stay has already bee^i granted by this Court, and in view of that, decision is not being take^ the writ petition is premature and Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (^^l^)