IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH AUGUST 2008 / 22ND SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 22363 of 2006(K) PETITIONER : LISSY M.L., MURUTTUPOOVATHUNGAL HOUSE, P.O. ALAGAPPANAGAR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 302(FULL TIME LANGUAGE TEACHER(HINDI), ALAGAPPANAGAR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ALAGAPPANAGAR P.O) BY ADV. SRI.LEGY ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS: 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OFFICE, THRISSUR. 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THRISSUR. 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR. 6. THE HEAD MASTER, ALAGAPPANAGAR GRAMA PANCHAYAT HIGH SCHOOL, ALAGAPPANAGAR P.O., THRISSUR. 7. THE SECRETARY(SPECIAL GRADE), ALAGAPPANGAR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THRISSUR DISTRICT. R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS,SC,KPSC GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.T.MUHAMOOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ADVICE MEMO ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT NO.R1(1)187/94 DATED 28.8.2001. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE FOURTH RESPONDENT DATED 30.6.2006. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE FIFTH RESPONDENT DATED 30.6.2006. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RELIEVING CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE SEVENTH RESPONDENT DATED 31.7.2006. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE THIRD RESPONDENT DATED 1.8.2006. EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE SIXTH RESPONDENT SENT TO THIRD RESPONDENT DATED 1.8.2006. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// AHZ/ K.T.SANKARAN, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 22363 OF 2006 K -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th August, 2008 JUDGMENT Subsequent to the filing of the Writ Petition, the petitioner got appointment in another school. Therefore, practically the Writ Petition has become infructuous. However, the petitioner submits that she has a grievance that full salary was not paid. If there is any subsisting grievance, the petitioner will be free to approach the appropriate authority and this Court. All contentions are left open. The Writ Petition is closed with the above observations. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/