IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11752 of 2010 ====================================================== 1. Bindu Kumari W/O Harkeshwar Mishra Vill.- Dath, P.O. Bharwari, P.S. Hassanpur, Distt.- Samastipur 2. Nandini Devi W/O Umakant Poddar Vill.- Paroria, P.S. Hassanpur, Distt.- Samastipur 3. Sunita Kumari W/O Ramadhar Yadav Vill.- Paroria, P.O. Mangalgarh, P.S. Hassanpur, Distt.- Samastipur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through D.M. Samastipur 2. Ramsagar Yadav S/O Late Triveni Yadav Mukhiya Paroria Gram Panchayat, P.S. Hassanpur, Distt.- Samastipur 3. Child Development Project Officer (C.D.P.O.) Hassanpur, P.S. Hassanpur, Distt.- Samastipur 4. District Magistrate, Samastipur 5. Commissioner, Darbhanga Division 6. Baby Kumari W/O Ravindra Jha Vill.- Dath, P.S. Hassanpur, Distt.- Samastipur 7. Ranjana Devi W/O Janardan Yadav Vill.- Paroria, P.S. Hassanpur, Distt.- Samastipur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp21) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA) 2 22-11-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and for respondent No.6 and 7. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 29.6.2010 passed by the Commissioner, Darbhanga Division on 29.6.2010 on an appeal filed by the private respondents. By the impugned order the Commissioner setting aside the order of the District Magistrate in Misc. Case No.733/05 Patna High Court CWJC No.11752 of 2010 (2) dt.22-11-2011 2 dated 7.3.2008 has directed fresh process of selection of Angan Bari Sevika. A Division Bench of the Court in L.P.A. No.772/11 has held that Angan Bari Sevikas are not government servants and cannot claim parity with them in engagement or removal. The remedy for them appropriately lies in a civil suit. The writ application is disposed with the observation that if so advised the petitioners may pursue their remedies appropriately in light of the Division Bench judgment. The writ application stands disposed. Krishna Chandra Jha/- (Navin Sinha, J)