IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.9054 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.06.2009 M/s Jackson Laboratories (P) Ltd. ...Petitioner VERSUS The Union of India and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. *** AJAY TEWARI J. After arguing for sometime learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that his representation (Annexure P-11) is pending and without deciding the same the respondents are proceeding to cancel the order which had already been placed with the petitioner, and, therefore he prays that the direction should be issued to respondent No.2 to decide the said representation and then proceed to take whatever action which may be warranted thereafter. In my opinion, this is a fair request. In the circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 CWP No.9054 of 2009 (O&M) -2- to decide the representation (Annexure P-11) within a period of four weeks by passing a speaking order thereon. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE June 09, 2009 ashish