[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLAGTE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3032 OF 2006. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3032 OF 2006. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3032 OF 2006. Shri Saiman Agustin Saldhana .. Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. Niranjan Mundari for the applicant Mr. S.S.Pednekar, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 21ST AUGUST, 2006. DATE : 21ST AUGUST, 2006. DATE : 21ST AUGUST, 2006. P.C. . After hearing Mr. Mundargi at length, I am of the view, that this is not a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Prima facie, the offence being serious and the applicant contending that there is a cross complaint so also he being deprived of the source of livelihood on account of his detention, this is a fit case, where the trial Court should endeavour and dispose of the case by the end of May, 2007. Liberty to file bail application to the trial Court, if the tiral Court does not conclude the tiral within time. ( S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) ( S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) ( S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)