1 Appln 4841-10 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4841 OF 2010 Satish Yashwant Patil ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.O.A.Siddiqui, Mr.Rajendra Rathod a/w. Mr,Vaibhav Punekar, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.P.H.Kantharia, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 27TH OCTOBER, 2010 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. First, an application of co-accused Atul Thakur had been considered and decided. Thereafter, the learned Counsel for the applicant sought that the matter be adjourned beyond vacation. When it was directed to be posted on 1st December, 2010, the learned Counsel for the applicant argued the matter at 2 Appln 4841-10 sufficient length and cited 3 Judgments. Then as I cut short argument of the learned APP saying that I was to reject application, the learned Counsel for the applicant sought leave to withdraw Criminal Application. Criminal Application is allowed to be withdrawn. 3. Criminal Application is disposed of as withdrawn but no fresh application would be entertained unless there is any change in the circumstances. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)