IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2011 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 10248 of 2011(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.N.T.CHANDRU, AGED 42 YEARS, BUSINESS, S/O.THIRUNAVUKARASHU, 3/514, JJ NAGAR, MOGAPAIR EAST, 3RD BLOCK, CHENNAI-60087. BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT SRI.K.N.ABHILASH SMT.R.LEELA SRI.ABHILASH BHASKAR SRI.BINU JOHN SMT.N.K.SHEEBA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VENGOLA VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. SR GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ....................... W.P.(C).10248/2011 ....................... Dated this the 31st day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court seeking to issue a direction to the second respondent to consider Ext.P2 and to issue a possession certificate in respect of a property covered by Ext.P1 document if he is actually in possession of the same. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, to the knowledge of the petitioner, inaction on the part of the concerned respondent is only in view of the recovery proceedings against the erstwhile owner by name M.V.Thomas. It is contended that, by virtue of law declared by this Court, it cannot be a reason at all, to deny the issuance of possession certificate. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 4. Considering the limited nature of the relief now pressed for, this Court does not find it necessary to decide the issue in either way. W.P.(C).10248/11 2 Writ petition is therefore, disposed of directing the second respondent to consider Ext.P4 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other affected parties, if any. Orders shall be passed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 5. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with the copy of this writ petition before the second respondent for taking further steps. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, Judge mrcs