IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.6389 of 2010 Date of decision : December 15, 2010 Partap Singh …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Bimal Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2. Surjit Singh, Judge(Oral) Heard and gone through the record. 2. Petitioner is a Patwari. He had been placed under suspension, because of some inquiry initiated against him by Vigilance Department. His suspension was revoked in December, 2008 and was posted in Patwar Circle Bhurva in Manali Tehsil. Now, vide order Annexure P-2, which is dated 23rd September, 2010, he has been shifted to Patwar Circle Gadsa in Kullu Tehsil. His grievance is that the transfer order is contrary to the Transfer Policy and the Guidelines issued by the State. 3. Petitioner has not explained how is he affected by the transfer. He is native of Ani Tehsil in outer Seraj of Kullu District. Gadsa is closer to his native place by not less than 50 kms. His further grievance is that his mother remains sick and, therefore, he should not have been Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …2… shifted. He has been brought near Kullu where there is a Zonal Hospital, but at Manali there is only Civil Hospital. In view of the abovestated position, I find no merit in the present petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed. December 15, 2010(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J