WP(C) 3585/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE BD AGARWAL Heard Mr. M Bhuyan, , learned counsel for the newly respondent namely, Deny Miss ong. Also heard Mr. BJ Ghosh learned Government Advocate for the State. The petitioner’s case is that he has been settled with No. 50 Batua River Fisher y by the Government of Assam for a period of 3 years vide order dated 03.01.201 1. It is the further case of the writ petitioner that before the expiry of the s ettlement period, Sissibar Anchalik Gaon Panchayat has also invited tender for s ettlement of Monohajan Meen Mahal which includes a part of the Batua River Fishe ry which has been settled with the writ petitioner. Admittedly, the writ petitioner has not enclosed the original settlement order. Be that as it may, the learned Government Advocate submitted that both the Fishe ry are different and not connected with each other and as such, there cannot be any dispute regarding the area of operation. Be that as it may, the petitioner has effective alternative remedy by way of ap proaching Zilla Parishad or the Government of Assam for resolving the dispute re garding the area of respective Fishery. In fact, the writ petitioner has already submitted representation before the Chief Executive Officer, Dhemaji Zilla Pari sahd on 04.04.2011. Hence, the said authority shall consider the representation and pass appropriate order. Anchalik Panchayat is allowed to proceed with the settlement of the Fishery . Interim order passed on 20.07.2011 stands vacated.