1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 1118 of 2008 Sk. Raheman s/o Sk. Turub ..vs.. State of Maharashtra. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : S. R. DONGAONKAR, J. DATE : 21st April, 2008 Heard Shri Bhangde, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri D. B. Patel, learned APP for respondent- State. This is an application under Section 439 of Cr. P C for grant of regular bail. The applicant is arrested for the offence punishable under Section 20 of the NDPS Act in Crime No.3018/2008 of P. S. Telhara for allegedly selling Ganga to one Sk. Abid Sk. Mehaboob. The Ganga was about 2 kg. 100 gm. It was seized during the search taken in consequence to allegations of stolen property. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the applicant that only evidence against the present applicant is the statement made by Sk. Abid Sk. Mehaboob. The learned APP has contended that the applicant was also prosecuted for the offence punishable under Sections 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act in one case and under Section 20 and 22 of NDPS Act in another case. 2 The learned counsel for the applicant makes a statement that the applicant has been acquitted in those cases, as there was no evidence against the applicant. In these circumstances and considering the nature of evidence which is available against the applicant, the applicant is entitled to bail. The applicant be released on bail on furnishing surety and PR Bond of Rs.25,000/- subject to conditions that he shall not directly or indirectly tamper with the prosecution evidence and shall attend the trial regularly and shall not commit any offence. Bail in lower Court. The application stands disposed of. Hamdast Allowed. JUDGE andurkar.