IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 23RD JULY 2009 / 1ST SRAVANA 1931 RP.No. 105 of 2007(C) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.29639/2000 Dated 19/06/2006 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): REVIEW PETITIONER/5TH RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------------- AITHAPPA NAIK, S/O. GOVINDA NAIK, PALILAPADAVU HOUSE, ENMAJAJE VILLAGE, P.O. PERLA, KASARAGOD. BY ADV. SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN SRI.PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4: ----------------------------------------------- 1. K. DAMODARA NAYAK @ K.LAKSHMANA NAYAK, ADOPTED SON OF K.SREENIVASA NAYAK, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, K.ANANDA NAIK, RESIDING AT KOIPADY VILLAGE, KUMBLA, KASARAGOD. 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, LAND REVENUE, TRIVANDRUM. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KASARAGOD. 5. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (A), KUMBLA, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. ADV.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER GOVT. PLEADER SRI.DILIP MOHAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== R.P.No.105/2007 in O.P.No.29639/2000 ================== Dated this the 23rd day of July, 2009 O R D E R In view of the fact that before passing judgment in O.P.No. 29639/2000 dated 19.6.2006, the petitioner in the review petition was not given notice, my judgment dated 19.6.2006 is recalled and the matter is taken up for hearing afresh. The review petition is allowed as above. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2