1 srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Writ Petition No.185 of 2010 Mr.Y.Pandurangaswami @ Swami Laxmaiya Yadgiri Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & anr. Respondents Mr.Ulhas Naik for petitioner. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP for State. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. July 7, 2010. P.C. 1. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and we have gone through the FIR registered against him. The custody of the minor son – Aryan was with the respondent – wife and the complaint filed by her with the Malad police station alleges that the petitioner has taken away the minor son from the mother’s lawful custody and contrary to the order 2 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate at Borivali. 2. On the peculiar facts of this case, the complaint filed by the respondent no.2 requires to be investigated and, therefore, we do not see any reason to entertain this petition to quash the FIR. The petition is rejected. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)