IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.4833 of 2009 Date of Decision : 26.08.2009 Roop Singh ...Petitioner Versus Nirmal Singh ...Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr. Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 27.7.2009 passed by the learned trial Court, whereby a Local Commissioner was appointed to visit the spot and to report about the actual and physical possession over the suit land. The order of appointing or refusing to appoint a Local Commissioner, is not amenable to the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. It was so held by the Division Bench of this Court in Balbir Dewan Cold Storage and General Mills Vs. Naveen Chander 1989 (1) PLR 677. In view of the said fact, I am of the opinion that the present petition challenging the order of appointment of Local Commissioner is not maintainable, as the report of the Local Commissioner is only an evidence in the suit, which does not decide any of the rights of the parties by itself. Dismissed. 26.08.2009 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE