IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.18938 of 2009 SANTOSH YADAV, S/o Late Dayanand Yadav, R/o Village – Gopalpur, Majhuwa, P.S. – Forbesganj, Dist. – Araria .. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………………….. Opposite Party. ----------- For the Petitioner:- Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State:- Mr. J.S.P. Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 2. 27.05.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner has been made accused in Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 461 of 2008 registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that F.I.R. was lodged against unknown persons. Name of the petitioner has come during the course of investigation as two co-accused persons, namely, Anil Sardar and Shambhu Yadav in their confessions statements have named the petitioner. It is submitted that there is no recovery of any incriminating article from the possession of the petitioner and in spite of the fact that the F.I.R. was lodged against unknown and that the petitioner is in jail custody since 31.12.2008, he has not been put on T.I. Parade. It is also submitted that Anil Sardar, one of the co-accused who has named the 2 petitioner, has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 27.02.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 2511 of 2009. Lastly, it is stated on behalf of the petitioner that antecedent of the petitioner is clean. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely, Santosh Yadav is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 461 of 2008. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )