IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9427 of 2006 Nand Kishore Giri,son of Late Nag Narayan Giri, resident of village- Ferusa, P.O. Ferusa, P.S. Garkha, District-Saran at Chapra.. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar , through Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna 2. The Director of Primary Education, Bihar, Patna 3. The Regional Deputy Director, Saran, District- Saran at Chapra 4. The Commissioner, Saran, District-Saran at Chapra 5. The District Magistrate, Saran, District- Saran at Chapra 6. The District Education Officer, Saran, District-Saran at Chapra 7. The District Superintendent of Education, Saran, District Saran at Chapra ……………………. Respondents. ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Shambhu Prasad, Advocate For the State: Mr. Neeraj Nandan, GP 18. ----------- 2. 27.3.2009 Heard learned counsels for the parties. The case of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground has been rejected by the respondent- authorities on the ground that he had produced a forged birth certificate showing his date of birth as 5.2.1972 whereas on due enquiry made from the Bihar School Examination Board as well as the Headmaster of the concerned school, it was found that his date of birth is 5.2.1966. For the said reasons the District Compassionate Committee at its meeting dated 26.9.1996 rejected the application of the petitioner on the ground that he has produced forged birth certificate. Thereafter the petitioner’s appeal has also been rejected by order dated 23.2.2004 of the Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra passed in Service Appeal No. 32/2002-03. Learned counsel for the petitioner takes a plea that the forgery was not committed by the petitioner but by the office staff and in this regard he has brought on record a photo copy of the 2 certificate issued by the Bihar School Examination Board which shows that his date of birth is 5th February 1966 and also a photo copy of the original application (Annexure-1) filed by him before the authorities. From perusal of the photo copy of the application (Annexure-1) it is evident that the letters “66” in the date of birth “05-02.1966” are much deeper than the other letters and most probably tampered and the date of birth in words also shows that the words “Panch Farwari” in Hindi are much lighter than the succeeding word “chhiasath” and evidently has been overwritten and tampered with. The same thus shows that even before this Court the petitioner has not come with clean hands and his statement that his application contained the date of birth 5.2.1966 and tampering was made by the employees of the Government office is belated and false. The writ application is accordingly dismissed. S.Pandey (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)