IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No.910 of 2008 Harbir Singh ………..Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ….Respondents Mrs. Prabha Naithani, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the State/ respondent nos.1 to 4. Mr. U.K. Uniyal, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Puja Banga, learned counsel for the respondent no.5 Dated: 1st December, 2010 Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Barin Ghosh, C.J. (Oral) No counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent nos.6 & 7. The allegation that they have encroached a part of land belonging to the respondent no.8 has not been denied. The proceedings in regard thereto are now pending before the appropriate authority. Let this be concluded, as quickly as possible. The respondent no.2 is directed not to allow any construction on the land being subject matter of the writ petition and belonging to the respondent no.8, until such time proceedings are concluded. The writ petition is thus disposed of. (V.K. Bist, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 01.12.2010 01.12.2010 Arpan