IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 4661 of 2008. Decided on: 13th September, 2010. Vinay Kumar Dhawan. …Petitioner. -Versus- The Administrator, Goswami Ganesh Datt Sanatan Dharam College, Baijnath, Distt. Kangra, H.P. and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate vice Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate. For the respondents. : None. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. D.P. Gupta, learned vice counsel for the petitioner submits that his client has not imparted any instruction to him and, therefore, he pleads no instructions. Consequently, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge 13th September, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?