P. R. No Presemad b‘l Sh' a E f a? “rag I :wECE‘E —-'§ L Kr, ” ‘ M i $ 7 XI—HC~78 2V - MWWfOQ WW {FL- 200 mmma‘aw) ‘WEEIW wmm WW§WW ‘ r $a1’rc‘mm m a w m 30-8-2006 Mr. Vishnu Koshta, coUnsei for the petitioner. Mr. Satish Gupta, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents, onadvance copy. Heard boththe counsel. - By the insmnt writ petition under Articie 2260f the Constitution of india, the petitioner has chalionged his'transfer order dated 29-7-2006 (Annexure P-2) passed by respondent No.3, whereby he has been transferred from Middie Schooi, Devgaon to Primary School, P.V.54, Block: Koyiibeda. The said transfer has been made under the rationaiization scheme. Ciause 7 of the rationaiizatior‘ scheme provides for an appeal by the aggrieved person. Learned counsei for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already preferred an appeai before respondent No.2 on 4~8—2006 and that appeal is not being decided by espondent N012, therefore. respondent No.2 be directed to decide the appea to whieh iearned counsei appearing for the State/respondents has no objecti n. Having heard iearned cou sei for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the ase, respondent No.2 is directed to decide the appeal of the petitioner with Soma 3O days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with l w. i With the direction aforesa , the petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P.N .3549.’2006 also stands disposedyef—a / , Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge i