@ GD Law IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (S) No. WK“) PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS / : 1 . OF 2011. Smt. Rukhmani Yadav, W/o. Shri Anand Ram Yadav, aged about 39 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Bevarti, Block Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 1 Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, I Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) 7 Joint Director, Treasury Account and Pension, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar at Jagdalpur (C. G.) @ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA @ XI~HC—-78 N:.£:.mxmz.&z . I zoo mm (Wu) mmm mw%=gétm $aifawsnam 'RXTXNKER DIWAKER S 8.‘ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E O3.08.201 1 Shri Somkant Verma, cou Shri N.Naha Roy, P.L. for Counsal for the petitions: entitled to bcncfit of two advam having passed B.’I‘.I. examinati appointmgxt at her own cost. involved in the present petition same has been fmally decided b‘ the case of Asha Saxena Vs. (HQMPJR (s0) s9. It is further submitted t1 similar View in its order dated 6257/2008. Counsel for the petitioners further submits that the order dated 29.4.2010 nsel for the petitioner. the State. r submits that the petitioner is :e increments on account of she on in the year 1992 before her It is submitted that the issue is no longer res integra and the y the Hon’ble Supxeme Court in State of MaP. 85 01's. 2009 Lat this Coutt has also taken a 6.2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No, passed in Writ Appeal NO. 124/2009, wherein relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Ashe Saxei by this Court in another Writ have been issued for considera advance increments as per circ the State of Madhya Pradesh pleaded in the petition. Counsel for the State sud would also be considered on the ma (supra; and the order passed. Appeal No. 87/2009, directions tion of the case for grant of two ular dated 21.9.1974 issued by after verification of the facts mits that case of the petitioner same lines. XI—HC—78 mmfwa? wmm Wm m 200 31mm (Wu) WWW In View of above, the mm WW $Wemé¥t aetition is disposed of with a dimction to the respondent authon‘tieS to decida the claim of the petitioner for grant of two advance incxements as per circular dated 21.9.1974 iss ued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after veridcation of the facts pleaded in the petition Within a period of four months It is made clear that thi $ would be at liberty to decide 1 with law. Sdl— Pritinker Diwaker Judge ‘s Court has not expressed any opinion on ments of the case and the authority concerned he same smctly in accordance ( flom today.