IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7983 of 2010 RAHIMA KHATOON D/O MD. HARUN R/O VILL- KALIKAPUR TOLA KATHOTIA, P.S. BARARI, DISTT- KATIHAR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MD. TASLIM S/O JAMALUDDIN R/O VILL- KALIKAPUR TOLA, KATHOTIA, P.S. BARARI, DISTT. KATIHAR. ----------- 2. 30.11.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 18.12.2009 by which cognizance has been taken only under Section 354 and 323 I.P.C. by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Katihar, in Complaint Case No. 2853/09, the petitioner had moved the Revisional Court also to no avail. It has been submitted that in the facts of the case prima facie case under Section 376/511 I.P.C. is made out and therefore, cognizance should have been taken even under those sections also. Since the order of cognizance does not necessarily confine itself to any offence as made out in the facts of the case at this stage the petitioner has no cause for grievance. The application is dismissed. However, the Magistrate at the relevant stage will consider as to whether under Section 376/511 I.P.S. is also made out in the facts of the case. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )