1 W.P. No.5820 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No.5820 Of 2010 Syeda Arshiya Tasneem D/o Syed A. Hameed. .. Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra And Others. .. Respondents. -------- Shri. A.N. Kakade, Advocate, holding for Shri. M.C. Syed, Advocate, for petitioner. Shri. K.G. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent No.1. Shri. P.P. More, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Shri. N.S. Kadarale, Advocate holding or Shri. M.M. Patil (Beedkar), Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATE 12 SEPTEMBER 2011 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The petitioner claims appointment in Aurangabad Municipal Corporation. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation has issued appointment order on 2 W.P. No.5820 of 2010 20th February 2010, but, so far, the petitioner could not be appointed. Para 10 of the affidavit-in-reply filed by respondent Nos.3 and 4 has been referred to. Learned counsel submits that in an identical situation one employee-Bhalchandra Paithane, working in the Corporation at Mumbai was appointed in Aurangabad Municipal Corporation. 3) Learned counsel for respondent No.2 – Corporation submits that even otherwise there is no vacancy in the Corporation and employees cannot be transferred from one Corporation to another Corporation in accordance with provisions of law as they stand today. 4) We have perused the relevant Government Resolutions and the material placed on record. In the facts of the case we are not inclined to issue directions in exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petition is rejected. Sd/- Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl