IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2274 OF 2007 Mukku Tirupati Reddy ..... ...... ......Petitioner V/s Mukesh Umedlal Gandhi & Anr. ..... ...... ...Respondents. Mr.A.Z.Mookhtiar, Adv. For the petitioner. Mr.V.M.Vaghela, Adv. For the respondent No.1 Mrs.M.H.Mhatre, APP for respondent No.2. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 31/1/08 PC: The trial Court convicted the present petitioner for an offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction and sentence an appeal was preferred. As there was delay in filing the appeal an application for condonation of delay was also filed rejection of which has given rise to the filing of the present writ petition. 2. During the pendency of this petition the parties have resolved their dispute amicably and minutes of order duly signed by both the parties and their respective advocates are placed on record. Both the learned counsel for respective parties urge that the writ petition be disposed of in terms of minutes of order. In the result writ petition is disposed of in terms of minutes of order. Minutes of order are taken on record and marked `X' for identification. Writ petition stands dispose of in terms of minutes of order. 31.1.08