:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 797 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 797 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 797 OF 2007 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2007 The State of Maharashtra ..Appellants versus Sou. Padmini Mayappa Jugale ..Respondent Dr. F. R. Shaikh, APP for the Appellants - State. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, & CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, & CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATE : 6TH JUNE, 2007. DATE : 6TH JUNE, 2007. DATE : 6TH JUNE, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned APP for the Appellants - State. 2. Respondent - accused, who is a woman, is alleged to have pushed a lady of about 70 years of age from the bridge into the river to avoid payment of money, which the victim was allegedly depositing with the accused for more than 13 years. The trial court acquitted the accused, firstly, on the ground that there was no evidence collected by the Investigating Agency about the deposit of money for :2: such a long time. Secondly, there is no eye witness. Thirdly, the conduct of the complainant and her testimony was found unnatural because she could not prove any of her contentions by corroborating evidence. There were no injuries on the person of the complainant even though she was pushed from the bridge into the river and therefore the judgment cannot be said to be perverse. Out of the two views possible, the trial court has taken the view and acquitted the accused. No reason to interfere. Leave refused. Application disposed of accordingly. (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.)