2l-< •"V CF0000151933 AIffiNDED aStSQS PETITION BEFORE THE HON'BLE 1-iIGH COURT OF JUDICATUEE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w .P.No.^f^_/2003. PSTITIONEK ; Shri Dushyant Kumar Sharma S/o Shri sharda Prasacl Sharma, age 53 years, Principal, 0-^P NATION&L HIGHER Secondary School, Durg, Distt. Eciucation Society, Durg (C,3. 5 ve r su s S^^\a^< RESPONDENTS ! (1) Qovt. of C.G. Through : Secretary (Education (Deptt.) D,K.S.Bhawan , Raipur. (2) Distt. Education OfflGer, :Durg (3) D5,stt. Edu.cation Soaieties, DXP National H.S. School, Durg (C.G.). &=t-J2^^J^!l.JJn3e^.-^t^l£-^^/^22..^i^-£c^5tJJ;utJ;SIi OF India HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Pctition No. 3644 of 2003 Versus Respondents Shri Dushyant Kuiuar Sharma GovemnientofC.G. & others Single Beach; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agalhotri. Shii Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the Petitioner. Sint, Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govemnient Advocate for the rcspondents. 0_R_A L_Q R DE R (4thJuty, 2006) L-eamed coixusel for the petitioner submits that fhe petitioner was workiag as Lecturer b;-r order dated 30.4.2001 (Aiinexure P,/l). The petitioner was duscted to work as Principal in Dau Raru Prasad National Higher Secoudar;'' School, Durg, for a period of one year froin 1.5.2001 to 30.4.2002. Accordiag to leamed counsel for fhe petitioner, the petitioner has contiauously been working as In-charge Principal ever since tiU date. This petition is filed seekilig several i-eliefs, but at tiie time of asguinent, leamed counsel appearilig for the petitioner submits that tb.e petitioner has decided not to press for other reliefs, except to consider fhe case of fhe petitioner for appointaneut on the post of Prmcipal on regular basis. The respondeuts/State was granted three weeks tinie on 20.4.2006 to Sle return to tlie raaia petition. The niatter was agaui listed on 12.6.2006, when two inore weeks tiaie was granted, as a last —^ b. opportunily, subject to pa5rm.ent of Rs. 250/- as cost to the High Court Legal Aid Services coiamittee, The respondents/State has neifher paid the cost nor ffled retum tiB date. • Hence, it is evident that the respondents/ State is not iatendiag to contest the niatter. On perusal of the papers, it @ clear from the letter dated 11.6.2002 (Annexure P/5) written by the Principal, Dau Raru Prasad National Higher Secondary School, Durg to the District Educatiou Officer, Dur| fhat the post of regular Principal is vacaut for a long tiine and letters have been written to fhe Joint Director, Public Instructions, three tnnes earBer, No steps were taken by fhe icspondents to fill iip fhe post of fhe Principal on fhe basis of regular appointiaent. In. \riew of the above-stated reasons, fhe respondents are directed to consider the appointiaent of the Priiicipal on regular basis ia Daii Raru Prasad National Higher Secoildajy School, Diirg after foUowiug proper procediu'e of law, expeditioiisly, pt'eferably within a period of t-tvo inonfhs froin fhe date ofrcceipt ofa copy ofthis oider. Tbe petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. satisbK.Ag,,ih^