SA No. 58 of 2009 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard Mr. I.P. Kohli, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel for the respondents. This second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 19.08.2009, passed by IV Fast Track Court / Additional District Judge, Haridwar, in Civil Appeal No. 43 of 2004, whereby said court has allowed the first appeal and set aside the judgment and decree dated 24.11.2004, passed by the trial court in Suit No. 86 of 1981. I have gone through the impugned order, and considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. The appellant appears to be an unathorised occupant of the property in question and the lower appellate court has discussed the evidence at length on this point. As such, the lower appellate court appears to have rightly found that the trial court committed error of law in decreeing the suit for permanent injunction against the true owner. There is not substantial question of law involved in this appeal. In the above circumstances, this appeal is dismissed summarily. (Stay Application No. 9001 / 2009 stands disposed of). (P.C.P., J.) 22.10.2009 NS