: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6597 OF 2006 Raghavan Kudrumal ... Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.S.K. Chourasia for Petitioner Mr.S.D. Rayrikar, AGP, for Respondent - State CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 13th JULY, 2009 P.C.: 1. The petition has been filed contending that a structure which the petitioner was occupying is to be demolished. The order of the Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Division dated 30.9.2006 in Appeal No.161 of 2005 has been challenged in the present petition. 2. An affidavit has been filed by the State in which it is stated that the petitioner had not submitted any documentary evidence indicating that the structure had been occupied by him prior to 1.1.1995 as required under the Government policy. Apart from this, the affidavit indicates that the structure was demolished on 8.11.2006. Photographs have been annexed to the affidavit indicating that the structure has been demolished. : 2 : 3. The learned advocate for the petitioner disputes the fact that the structure has been demolished. Since the petition raises disputed questions of fact, in my opinion, the writ petition need not be entertained. 4. Petition is rejected. The petitioner may take appropriate proceedings in order to redress his grievance.