WM HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR MM SB : HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER‘ W.P. 1222! N0. 2110i 2009 PETITIONER Pmetam Singh Garcha, S/o. Late Jogendar Singh, aged about S9 yeam, r/o. Civil Ligcs, Raipur (CG) State Transpart Appellate Tn'bunal, Raipur (CG) State Transport Authority Chhattiggarh, New Bus Stand Pandn’, Raipur (CG) Wasau Singh, S/o. Jogendar Singh, Pandri Bus Stand Raipur (CG) the MaBaging Pandn‘ Bus Stand Raipur (CG) (appellant bafom the S;’I‘.A.’I‘.) WRIT PETITION UHDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE X CONSTITUTION OF INDIA pctitionsr. Shri A.S.Kachhawaha, Dy. AG. for the State. ORAL ORDER (23.04.2009) Challenge in the pmsent writ petition is to the onier datcd 16.3.2009 passed by the Presiding O$cer, State Tmnsport Appellate Tn‘bunal by which the said authority has Kanker Roadways, Through Partner, Thmugh power of attorney holder Ajay Singh S/o. Late Satwant Singh Gill, R/o. M 9%,, allowed the appEcation as m by respondant No.3 under Secn'on 5 of the Limitation Act and has condomd tbs delay. Contention of the petitioner is that the oxder impugned is illegal because to bring the case Within the limitation subsequently, another copy was obtained by the respondent No.3. According to him, it is ,appamnt from the record that earlier also certilied copy was obtained but intentionally that has been suppressed and after obtaining the second. copy, an attempt was made to bring the case Within limitation. I have heard both the counsel and have perused the record. The disctetion has been exercised by the Presiding OfEcer, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, by giving a detailed cider and reasoning. There is no ermr appaxent on the face of mconi or any arbitrariness which warrants interference of this Court under Article 227 of the constitution of India. In the result, the petition has no merits and the same is accordingl dismissed. Sdl- Pritinker Diwaker .1 a Judge J y