IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20755 of 2010 RAGHUNATH RAI @ MUNNA, S/o Sri Ramchandra Rai. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 17.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. In the First Information Report even though the allegation is that the petitioner had caused the death of the father of the informant but subsequently the informant filed a petition on 05.03.2009 stating therein that in fact he had not identified the petitioner as one of the assailants of the deceased. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Mushahari P.S. Case No. 19 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with 2 the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. The Magistrate will notice the complainant and confirm that he had filed a petition dated 05.03.2009 disputing the complicity of the petitioner before releasing the petitioner on bail. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)