BEFORE THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI£^^i AT BILASPUR. CCtS^ ?SEP@^^ ^si • Contempt^Civil No. 3o5 Of2010 PETITIONER 918S® :: K.K.Shukla, S/o. Late Shri Premlal Shukla, Aged about 80 Yrs, Retired ^J^^-,-^j^Deputy Registrar, Pt. Ravishankar ^^f'^^"" Shukla University, Raipur (C.G.) il^^ ^".",.v.^-" "" R/°-131' Anand Nagar, Raipur ^ ",2^AV'^ (C.G.) RESPONDENTS CONTEMNORS Yersys :1) M.K.Raut, Secretary, Higher Education Department, State of C.G., D.K.S.Bhawan, Secretariat, Raipur (C.G.) :2) M.K.Raut, Commissioner, Higher Education, C.G. D.K.S.Bhawan, Secretariat, Raipur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^I|IC-22 W^T^T ^Jch 3Tl|^T ^RT^^-n Praveen ^cf ^t|<41d^, ^Ti1^JI3, f^^KHy 3T^T ^[^ ^^..^;*.....C^...C^^/° ^^T" 3TI^T'^TI^H:'^tt^T SB : Hon^ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J 19.01.2011 Shri L.C. Dash, Advocal Shri M.K. Dubey, counsel for Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Sr| Shrivastava, counsel for the re Heard. From the reply and affi^ revealed that in compliance by this Court in W.P (S) No| been received on 11.10.2010 order on 1.12.2010 and 4.11 there is no disobedience or vi Court. The rule is therefore dis< The petition is according 4)l^(d<lflril 'RW^ff"? tt^ iFsi^K '^3^m<3TT^?T appears under instructions from the petitioner. Advocate along with Shri Pankaj |spondents. lavit filed by the respondents, it is tf the order dated 1.7.2010 passed 12957/10, which is stated to have the respondents have passed the ^.2010. Therefore, it appears that jolation of the order passed by this ^harged. |ly finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^ ^^