IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.704 of 2009 VIPIN KUMAR @ RAVI RANJAN KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5 02.07.2009 Pursuant to the order dated 24.6.2009, a supplementary affidavit has been filed. The petitioner has made an attempt to explain his criminal antecedent in paragraph nos. 3 and 4 which read as follows: “(3) That before this case, petitioner was involved in J.J.B. case no. 648/06, 649/06, 503/06 and 513/06 and petitioner was granted bail in all the above mentioned cases. (4) That further the petitioner was involved in J.J.B. case no. 366/08, 367/08. As regards Juvenile Justice Board case no. 366/08, petitioner was granted bail by Appellate Court, Court of Sessions Judge, Patna. As regards J.J.B. case no. 367/08, Criminal Revision no. 702/2009 is dismissed by Hon’ble Patna High Court and ordered to renew the prayer after six months.” Petitioner is facing prosecution under section 392 of Indian Penal Code. It is contended that he is in custody 17.7.2008. Having regard to the antecedent and other materials on record including the nature of accusations on which he has been booked in the present case, the two courts have refused his prayer for bail according reasons therefor. This Court also accords with the view taken by the courts below and, therefore, is not inclined to interfere with the present order(s). The application is, therefore, dismissed. However, the petitioner is granted liberty to renew prayer for bail in the court below itself after 06 months which shall 2 be considered on its own merit having regard to the further materials, if any, brought to the notice of the court. While disposing of such application, the court below shall be uninfluenced by the present order. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )