CRM-M No.36392 of 2009 Raunak Singh vs. State of Punjab & another Present: Mr. A.K.Khunger, Advocate. for petitioner. Mr. Mehardeep Singh, DAG, Punjab. **** This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.PC for quashing the FIR No.30 dated 08.04.2009 under Section 363/366 IPC at PS Dayalpura, Distt. Bathinda. The wife of the petitioner and respondent No.2 is present in Court. On instructions of Darshan Singh, ASI, Learned state counsel has argued that the wife of the petitioner is actually underage. The wife of the petitioner has expressed that she wants to stay with the petitioner at any cost. On this, the learned state counsel has submitted that this incident has brought a great position of embarrassment to respondent No.2 because petitioner is living in the neighbouring village. He further states that respondent No.2 is complaining that the petitioner and his companions are regularly taunting and threatening the respondent No.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner will leave their village within a period of two months from today so as to at least spare the family members of the wife of the petitioner from any undesirable behaviour. As regards as the threats, which are allegedly being made to the respondent No.2 I deem it appropriate to direct the CRM-M No.36392 of 2009 -2- SSP, Bathinda that in any case any such threat is made to the respondent No.2, it should be taken seriously and he should supervise the investigation himself. Learned State counsel on instructions of respondent No.2 states that if these two conditions are fulfilled, respondent No.2 is not interested in prosecuting the petitioner. Consequently, in view of the fact that the allegations are not very serious and in view of the decision of this Court in Kulwinder Singh & others vs. State of Punjab, reported as 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this compromise is accepted, and the present petition is allowed and FIR No.30 dated 08.04.2009 under Section 363/366 IPC at PS Dayalpura, Distt. Bathinda, is quashed. This petition is allowed. Copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties under the signatures of Court Secretary. December 24, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE