6 C^l^T^ M, -^? BS^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) W.P. (S) No. -7$'?>Q? /2010 PETITIONER ^yy ^•--"" RESPONDENTS Rajendra Kumar Sahu, S/o. Shri Ramadhin Sahu, aged about 42 years, R/o. Mukam - Bodra.Post Sambalpur, Tahsil & Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS (1) State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division (Samanya), Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) (3) Depot Officer, office of Depot Officer (forest), Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .^!;-"":*~& mGH COURT OF OBHATnSGAKH AT BIL^PUR WRCT FErmON (S) No. 7583 of3010 PETiroONER RE^PQNDENTS : RajendraKumarSahu. , VBRSUS : StateofCU»a(tisgarii&Odiere. WMT PETmON UNDHR ARIICLE 226 OS THE CQNSTmJIION OF INDIA SBs Hnn'bte ShriSatish K. Aanihutrfc J. . - Present: Ain^ 5. SEhri VinodDeaimuitt, AdvbcatefiirtliepetitMaer,^',^^ i Shri Y.S.Thalcu, Dy. A.& fiwlhe State/reqwiulents. . (MiPERtCiRAI-) (Passedon 03rt day ofs.lanuaty,2eit) Grievance of ihe petitioner is ihat fliou^ he is entitled for Ms regularizatiai on the post ofForest Guard, he has been regularized an flie post of Watehman. Counsel for Ae petitioner subnuts ttut flie rwpandents have completed all Ifae fonnalities for pagsing necessary oider te.favour<fflie jpetitiaier itnd therefore at this stage fee petitioaer may be paimtted to wilfadww the present petition wltit liberty to file a fi'esh rqu'esentatiai beicTB respandent No. 2 and the same may be directed ta be Acided in aecMdaace wifli law ag e3^)editious2y as pogsible. CouDsel for flie State sutaiits fliirtwMhout ascartaming Ae fact he cannot inake any statemant whedier Ihe State QovemmeiS u wiUing to regdarize Ae services (rffliepetitioner on tte post of.For^ttfiUMdof nofc However, he has no objecdon if te petitunet taates a iqwesantation befeteAe aulfaority concemed andfee game is decided by itinaccfM'dancewithlaw. - Accordingly, Ihe petiti<ai is duposed efwiih a direetien ihat ia fhe event of any repreBeatati<m filed by the petitioner befare tespoaSeKt No; 2 raising liis grtevances, die aame is eiq)eeted toi,be deeided by die aufhority concemed in accordance wi8i tow, as 'expedttfeusfy as possible. . .. .:.•.—,;..-:.,,',,,,:. y; It is naade clear that this Court has not cspwsaed any <q>nuon on maats offlie case and (he aulhority comsemedwould be atBberty to deeide dhe Tepresaitation afthe petitioaer strictlyaacGwdanceBithlaw. ?{ ^