IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 21ST KARTHIKA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1120 of 2008(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.11556/2008 Dated 20/06/2008 .................... PETITIONERS: PETITIONERS 6 AND 9 ---------------------------------- 1. MARY, WIFE OF MATHEW, AGED 55, PARUTHIKKAD, CHERANELLOOR.P.O, KOCHI-34. 2. SUDHAKARAN, S/O. KRISHNAN, AGED 60, PULLAMVELIL, SREEKRISHNA, CHERANELLOOR.P.O, KOCHI - 34. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT NO.9 ------------------------------ SMT.M. BEENA, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS) BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI. D. ANIL KUMAR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ------------------------------- CONT. CASE No. 1120 OF 2008 ------------------------------- Dated this the 12th November, 2008. JUDGMENT Heard Mr. P.B.Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. D. Anilkumar, learned Govt. Pleader for the respondent in detail. Scanned all the materials produced, particularly the photographs produced from either sides. I do not think that a case for initiation of action for contempt is made out against the respondent. The contempt of court case is dismissed. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE jj