IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD JULY 2008 / 1ST SRAVANA 1930 WA.No. 1528 of 2008() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.18112/2008 Dated 08/07/2008 .................... APPELLANT: PETITIONER: ---------------------------------------- H.A.BHOVI, 861350461 CONSTABLE CISF UNIT, CPT, COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.G.SASIDHARAN CHEMPAZHANTHIYIL SRI.S.VISHNU RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: -------------------------------------------------- 1. THE COMMANDANT, CISF UNIT, CPT, COCHIN. 2. D.I.G., CISF.SOUTHERN SECTOR, CHENNAI. 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, CISF HEAD QUARTERS, BLOCK NO.13, CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI. BY ADV.SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.SOLICITOR GENERAL R1 TO 3 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss J.B.KOSHY & P.N.RAVINDRAN, JJ. ------------------------------- W.A.NO.1528 OF 2008 () ----------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of July, 2008 J U D G M E N T KOSHY,J. The petitioner is working as a Constable in the CISF Unit of Cochin Port Trust. He was transferred to CISF Unit, UCIL, Jaduguda, in the State of Uttar Pradesh. He has got 15 years of service. He was transferred in 2006-07. Against Ext.P1 transfer order, he made Ext.P2 representation contending that his daughter is studying in Class X at Kendriya Vidyalaya, Cochin Port Trust. He pleaded that his transfer be deferred for one more year to retain in Cochin. His request was considered and one more year was granted to retain in Cochin. Again in 2006, he proposed to be transferred. At that time also, he requested for deferment contending that his son was studying in 10th Standard. Again one year was granted. Now also he is proposed to be transferred. Now his W.A.1528/08 2 request is that his daughter is studying in 12th Standard and examination has already been fixed. He was working in the South Zone for the last 14 years. He is a transferred employee and he is bound by transfer orders. There are several employees who are awaiting for transfer to home State. Next year his son will be studying in 12th Standard and at that time also he may request for deferment of transfer. Taking into consideration of the circumstances, Learned Single Judge rejected the contention. Petitioner submitted that family may be allowed to retain at the CISF Unit, Cochin. Even though in the normal circumstances, he can be retained only for 15 days. The learned Single Judge directed as follows: “But, I direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to be retained at the CISF Unit of Cochin Port Trust till 20.7.2008 to enable to him to make arrangements for the stay of his family.” We are of the view that maximum benefits were granted to the petitioner and we see no ground to interfere in the impugned W.A.1528/08 3 judgment of the learned Single Judge, and hence, this appeal is dismissed. J.B.KOSHY, JUDGE P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE prp J.B.KOSHY & P.N.RAVINDRAN, JJ. -------------------------------------------------------- M.F.A.NO. OF 2006 () --------------------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T --------------------------------------------------------- 26th May, 2008