IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13310 of 2010 1. KAPILDEO MAHTO S/O NATHUNI MAHTO 2. RAJENDRA MAHTO 3. YOGENDRA MAHTO 4. VIJAY MAHTO SONS OF YADUNANDAN MAHTO 5. RAM SUBHAG MAHTO S/O DINKAR MAHTO 6. MANOJ MAHTO S/O SAKAL MAHTO 7. CHANDESHWAR MAHTO S/O JANAK LAL MAHTO 8. INDRADEO MAHTO S/O KHIRODHAN MAHTO 9. HARIBANS MAHTO S/O NATHANI MAHTO ALL R/O VILLAGE KISANPUR YUSUF, P.S. SARAIRANJAN, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. BRAHMDEO MAHTO S/O LATE VIKAN MAHTO R/O VILLAGE KISANPUR YUSUF P.S. SARAIRANJAN DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR ----------- 2. 13.12.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 21.7.2003 passed in C.R. Case No. 748/2002, by which the Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur has taken cognizance in the matter. The petitioner also seeks quashing of the revisional order dated 22.02.2010 passed in Cr. Revision No. 674 of 2003, by which he refused to interfere in the matter. Since the petitioner has sought quashing on disputed questions of fact, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. However, the court below is directed to ensure that only one complaint is permitted to be entertained with regard to the present occurrence. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )