WA 116/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MADAN B. LOKUR HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PK MUSAHARY The limited grievance of the appellants is that even though the selection of the Principals/Superintendents was held to be vitiated in law, the learned Single J udge directed continuance of the writ petitioners in their respective posts till necessary recruitment rules are framed and a fresh selection is made. The learn ed Single Judge has fixed the outer limit for framing the recruitment rules and making the selection as 12.9.2011. We may note that the appointment of the Principals/Superintendents is in Arabic Colleges and Madrassas and as stated by learned counsel for the writ petitioners his clients have been working as such since their selection some time in 2008. In the circumstances, we do not think it would be appropriate to disturb the wri t petitioners for a period of hardly three or four months more particularly, whe n we are told by learned counsel for the appellants that the draft recruitment r ules have already been framed and they only need to be notified. The draft recruitment rules should be notified and selection made within the lim it prescribed by the learned Single Judge that is by 12.9.2011. Until then or if the selection is made before 12.9.2011, the writ petitioners will not be distur bed. However, if the selection is not made by 12.9.2011, the writ petitioners wi ll not continue to work as Principals/Superintendents in the Arabic Colleges and Madrassas which were the subject matter of the writ petitions. This writ appeal is disposed of in the above terms since no other issue has been raised by learned counsel for the appellants.