IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 2750 OF 2004 INDOSONIC INC. & ORS. .. PETITIONERS Vs. COMMISSIONER OF CO-OPERATION & ORS. .. RESPONDENTS Ms. Indu Varma for petitioners Mr. H.S. Shreepad Murthy for R-2 & 3 Mr. A.H. Palekar, AGP for R-4 CORAM:-SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. DATED:-1-4-2005 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, respondents 2 & 3 and Mr. Palekar, Ld. AGP for respondents 1 and 4. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners and respondents 2 and 3 state that the parties have settled their dispute amicably and hence they intend to file consent terms. Mr. Palekar, the learned AGP states that since the petitioners and respondents 2 and 3 have settled the dispute, respondents 1 and 4 have no objection to the writ petition being disposed of in terms of the consent terms. Consent terms duly signed by the petitioners and on behalf of respondents 2 and 3 by Mr. Kirtane, the authorised officer and by their respective counsel are taken on record and marked “X”. 3. Order in terms of the consent terms. Writ petition is disposed of in terms of consent terms. Needless to say that all civil applications stand disposed of. .....