THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU CONTEMPT CASE No.332 of 2010 Date: 22.11.2010 Between: M/s. Sri Subrahmanyanagar Plot Owners Welfare Association, Visakhapatnam. …Petitioner And Government of A.P., rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Assn.POT) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU CONTEMPT CASE No.332 of 2010 ORDER : This contempt case is filed complaining willful disobedience on the part of the respondents in implementing the order, dated 8.10.2009, passed by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.27869 of 2009 in W.P.No.21448 of 2009, wherein the respondents were directed to forthwith process the applications of the members of the petitioner Association as per the statement enclosed therewith by disposing of the said representations, dated 13.2.2009. 2. There is no necessity of going into all the details. A perusal of the counter affidavit filed by the respondents discloses that the respondents have taken up the applications filed by the petitioner Association and the matter was considered by the Committee constituted for the said purpose and the District Collector, Visakhapatnam, issued proceedings Roc.No.3123/2009/E2, dated 23.3.2010, stating that the claims of the members of the petitioner Association deserve no consideration and, therefore, they were disallowed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner Association states that the members of the petitioner Association are in occupation of above 250 square yards of land each, therefore, the matter needs to be processed by the higher authority i.e., Chief Commissioner of Land Administration (CCLA), Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. Instead of doing so, the respondents have rejected the claims of the members of the petitioner Association. 4. This aspect cannot be gone into in a writ petition. Primafacie, after examining the matter, the respondents found that the members of the petitioner Association are not eligible for consideration of their claims. 5. Under those circumstances, nothing survives for further action in this contempt case. If the members of the petitioner Association are aggrieved by the order, dated 23.3.2010, issued by the District Collector, they may work out their remedies as are available under law. 6. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 22.11.2010. Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU CONTEMPT CASE No.332 of 2010 22.11.2010 (Msr)