IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.17299 of 2011 Date of Decision : September 15, 2011. Harjit Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.S.Manhas, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is a Ticket Verifier in the Punjab Roadways. On his request, the petitioner was transferred from Batala to Pathankot by the Director, State Transport, Punjab vide order dated 27.7.2011. The petitioner accordingly joined at Pathakot on 16.8.2011. The above stated transfer order has now been virtually set- aside by the General Manager, Punjab Roadways, Batala who vide the impugned order dated 29.8.2011 (Annexure P-5) stated that the petitioner has been adjusted at Batala only. The aggrieved petitioner has approached this Court. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and CWP No.17299 of 2011 [2] considering the fact that the transfer is an incidence in service, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order at this stage. Suffice it to mention that the petitioner was earlier transferred from Batala to Pathankot by the Director, State Transport, Punjab, hence the petitioner may approach the Director, State Transport, Punjab, who in turn is directed to re-consider the petitioner request sympathetically and pass an appropriate order within a period of one month from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. September 15, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE