- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.4329 OF 1999 SUMMARY SUIT NO.4329 OF 1999 SUMMARY SUIT NO.4329 OF 1999 Ms.Zainab Ashfar Kagalwala. .. Plaintiff. .. Plaintiff. .. Plaintiff. v/s. v/s. v/s. 1.Tejoomals Limited & Ors. .. Defendents. .. Defendents. .. Defendents. Ms. Rekha Shukla, advocate for plaintiff. Defendant no.3 Present. CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE, J. CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE, J. CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : DATE : DATE : 5TH OCTOBER, 2004 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. The plaintiff is present with her advocate. So also the defendant No.3. Defendant No.3 states that he has been authorised to sign on behalf of his wife defendant No.4. They have filed consent terms duly signed by the plaintiff and defendants and their respective advocates. The consent term is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. Suit stands disposed of accordingly. Refund of court fees as per rule. Certified copy expedited.