IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3496 of 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3496 of 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3496 of 2007 The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant versus Asif Ibrahim Shaikh ..Respondent Mr. Saste for the State None for the Respondent CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 28th April, 2008. DATED : 28th April, 2008. DATED : 28th April, 2008. P.C. 1. Perused the application for cancellation of bail. The application is styled in a way to suggest that the Order by which the bail was granted was not proper. This cannot be the ground for cancellation of bail. 2. Across the bar learned Advocate Mr Saste submitted that the accused has not reported to the concerned police station as per Clause 5 of the bail order. He could not point out the specific averment in his application so as to show that the accused has not complied with the order. So, at this stage, no interference is required. Hence the -2- Order ORDER Application is rejected. (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.)