IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36335 of 2009 RAMESH SADA son of late Raghuari Sada, resident of village Anchara Lalpur, P.S. Balrampur, District Katihar.. …Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR… ..OPPOSITE PARTY For the Petitioner: M/s Vikram Deo Singh, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. … 3 17.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the first information report, which is lodged against 20-30 unknown persons, though the informant claims that he would identify the miscreants, in case they are produced before him. It is further submitted that the petitioner has not been put on test identification parade in spite of the fact that he is in jail custody since 20.05.2009. Chargesheet has already been submitted in this case. It is further submitted that apart from Karandighi (Dalkola) Police Station Case No. 94/09, the petitioner has not been implicated in any other criminal case. It is submitted by learned counsel for the State that the petitioner along with co-accused Naimuddin was - 2 - arrested with looted articles and in that connection Karandighi (Dalkola) Police Station Case No. 94/09 had been lodged and the looted articles have been identified by the informant, which is apparent from the case diary. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the fact that the looted articles have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and those articles have been subsequently identified by the informant, I am not inclined to grant bail to this petitioner. This application is, accordingly, dismissed for the present. However, the petitioner, if so advised, may renew his prayer for bail after six months. SC (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)