WPMS No. 1497 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. R.S. Sammal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.C. Arya, Brief Holder for the State. The petitioner’s licence has been suspended against which he preferred an appeal which has also been rejected. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the aforesaid orders, has filed the present writ petition. After perusing the impugned order and, upon hearing of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this court does not find it fit to interfere in the suspension order at this stage. The writ petition fails and is dismissed. The court, however, directs the prescribed authority to decide the matter with regard to the licence of the petitioners within three months from the date of the production of a certified copy of the order. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 26.08.2010 Shiv