wp9512.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9512 OF 2010 Kachrulal s/o Tulsiram Gajre .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. M.G. Deokate, advocate holding for Mrs. S.D. Tambat – Dhumal, advocate for the petitioner. Mrs, A,V. Gondhalekar, AGP for the State. ===== CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 20 th DECEMBER, 2010 PER COURT : 1 Petitioner belongs to ‘Dhor’ community. It is informed that the proposal in respect of validation of the caste claim was tendered to respondent no. 2 by the petitioner. However, it was found that the proposal is not complete in all respects and therefore, the same was returned back to the petitioner. Petitioner has again approached respondent no. 2 with a request to re-consider the proposal in respect of validation of the caste claim. However, the request made by the petitioner is not yet considered by wp9512.10 2 respondent no. 2 – Committee. As such, the petitioner has approached this court seeking direction to respondent no. 2 – Committee to accept the proposal and decide the same within stipulated period. 2 Respondent no. 2 – Committee is, therefore, directed to accept the proposal which would be submitted by the petitioner within a period of three weeks from today. On receipt of the proposal, respondent no. 2 shall decide the claim in respect of validation of certificate, within a period of three months thereafter. Petition stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE ) ( B. R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb