IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35422 of 2010 RAM BABU SINGH, S/O SRI RAM SEVAK SINGH, R/O VILLAGE CHAND CHAUR DIH, PAITHAN TOLA, P.S. - UJIYAPUR, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR …………..Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 11.10.2010 Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Uma Shankar Prasad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The sole petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Samastipur Rail P.S. Case No. 92 of 2009 for the offence under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while pressing the bail petition submits that there was no sufficient material against the petitioner, even then the petitioner was made accused in the present case. It has further been submitted that one of the co- accused, namely, Ashok Mahto almost having similar allegation has already been granted bail, accordingly petitioner may be given same privilege. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State has opposed the prayer for bail. He has referred to certain paragraphs of the case diary, which shows there were material against this petitioner. In this case earlier, the case diary was called for. The case relates to committing dacoity in running train. In this case sufficient material have been collected, during investigation showing involvement of the petitioner. One mobile phone, which was looted from the passenger of the train was 2 alleged to have been used by this petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case the petition for bail stands rejected. Bhardwaj ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)