IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.27244 of 2008 HEMANTO RAI & ORS Vrs. THE STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 04.08.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioners, the State as well as the complainant. 2. Petitioner no. 1 is the husband and rest are in-laws of the complainant. Allegation against them is that they demanded dowry and due to non-fulfilment tortured the complainant and insisted her to leave matrimonial house with two children. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 1 is ready to keep his wife, the complainant, and has filed a case in the Court of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Katihar, for restitution of conjugal right. Counsel for the complainant states that the complainant also wants to live with her husband with her children. If that is there, the parties should appear before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Katihar, and file an affidavit in this regard there and start living with each other. 3. Considering the facts, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners, Hemanto Rai, Ganga Rai, Jittu Rai, Most. Hiramani and Kasim Rai, is allowed. They are directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case of their surrender before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Petition No. 159 of 2008 to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )