IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC No. 284 of 2010. Decided on: 4th August, 2011. Vijay Kumar. …Petitioner. Versus Sh. P. Mitra & others. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Dutt Vasudeva, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ankush Sood, Addl. Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that the issue as to whether the petitioner is entitled to regular appointment or contractual appointment is the subject matter of LPA filed by the State. It is also submitted that the petitioner herein is party to the LPA. Without prejudice to the liberty to the petitioner to pursue his claim for regular appointment in the LPA, the contempt petition is dismissed, discharging the notice. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 4th August, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (vs/kck) Judge.