Writ Petition No. 1180 (SS) of 2006 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Inteim Relief Application No. 11176 of 2006 Heard Sri Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. Anjali, learned standing counsel for the respondent no. 1, Smt. Beena Pandey, learned standing counsel respondent no. 2 and Sri N.P. Sah, learned standing counsel for the State on behalf of respondent nos. 3 and 4. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted the controversy raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgement and order dated 21.08.2006 passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 1132 (SS) of 2006 (Ravi Shankar Divedi and others. Vs. Union of India and others), consequently, the present writ petition may be decided on the same terms and observations of the aforesaid judgement. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is finally disposed of on the same terms and observations made in the judgement and order dated 21.08.2006 passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 1132 (SS) of 2006 (Ravi Shankar Divedi and others Vs. Union of India and others) Writ petition along with interim relief application no. 11176 of 2006 is disposed of accordingly. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) 31.08.2006 S.K.S