1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.1811/2001. : : Durga Prasad Gupta Vs. RSRTC Jaipur & Ors. : : Date of Order 4.11.2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr.Peus Nag for Mr.S.K.Saksena for the petitioner. Mr.Vinod Goyal for the respondent. This writ petition was filed way back in the year 2001 with the prayer that the respondents be directed to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Traffic Inspector as well as the Traffic Inspector in Departmental Promotion Committee as and when it was held in near future. In spite of service of notice of the writ petition issued to the respondents way back on 20.4.2001, no reply to the writ petition has been filed. The prayer of the writ-petitioner, as would be evident on the face of it, is innocuous in nature. The petitioner, who is working on the post of Conductor, has to be obviously considered for promotion as per the seniority in accordance with the rules. The respondents have neither contested the claim nor have 2 denied the right of consideration of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner referred to the number of penalty orders passed against the petitioner, which have been enumerated in the writ petition. It goes without saying that these penalty orders would also part of service record but for that right of consideration for promotion cannot be denied to the petitioner. What would be effect of the penalty and for how long promotion would be delayed on that account, shall be dealt with by the authorities in accordance with the relevant rules. In the result, this writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/- Item No.14.