IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 385 OF 2010 SMT. LAXMI VISHNU RAUL AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus SMT. SUHASINI PANDURANG HALDANKAR AND 5 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. J. P. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. A.D. Bhobe, Advocate for Respondents Nos.1 to 5. Mr. S.D. Padiyar, Advocate for Respondent No.6. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 5th August, 2010 P.C.: Heard learned Counsel. 2. Counsel agree that in terms of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of State of Rajasthan V/s. T.N. Sahani & Ors. (2001(10)SCC 619), the applications to produce additional evidence had to be disposed of along with the appeal. Consequently, the impugned orders are hereby set aside and the learned first appellate Court is hereby directed to dispose of the application for production of additional document of both the parties at the time of hearing of the appeal in accordance with law. Parties to appear before the learned first appellate Court on 24/08/2010 at 10.00 a.m. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH