-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION NO.1133 OF 2007 IN APPEAL NO.980 OF 2007 1. Dayanand Atmaram Shingan 2. Pravin Ramdasji Khadadkar ..Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.Harshad Bhadbhade Advocate for Applicants Mr.A.S.Gadkari APP for Respondent-State CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 18, 2007 DATE : DECEMBER 18, 2007 DATE : DECEMBER 18, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard both sides. 2. We have passed order today granting bail to the original accused no.3 in Criminal Application No.1004 of 2006 in Criminal Appeal No.815 of 2007. 3. The present application is filed by the accused nos.1 and 2 from the same case i.e. Sessions Case No. 119 of 2006. We have discussed the reasons -2- while granting bail to accused no.3 in the above referred order. The present applicants are also in the company of the accused no.3 in the same set of facts as narrated in Criminal Application No. 1004 of 2006 in Appeal No. 815 of 2007. What we find is that prima facie the facts as discussed, will show no complicity of the present accused persons so far as the commission of offence is concerned. We therefore, are inclined to grant bail to the present applicants. These applicants were on bail during the trial also. 4. Applicant No.1-Dayanand Atmaram Shingan and applicant No.2-Pravin Ramdasji Khadadkar be released on bail in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each with like surety till the disposal of the appeal. 5. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [ S.B.MHASE, J.]