IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 22ND SEPTEMBER 2011 / 31ST BHADRA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3218 of 2011() ------------------------- CC.625/2010 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, THAMARASSERY .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED ------------------------------------ 1. MOHAMMED FAIZAL, S/O.HAMSA, AGED 29 YEARS, ARIYIL, RAMPOYIL, MADAVOOR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. HAMSA, AGED 60 YEARS, ARIYIL, RAMPOYIL, MADAVOOR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. AMINA, W/O.HAMSA, AGED 50 YEARS, ARIYIL, RAMPOYIL, MADAVOOR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 4. RAHEES, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.HAMSA, ARIYIL, RAMPOYIL, MADAVOOR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.A.SALIL NARAYANAN RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031. 2. LUBNA FARHATH, D/O.ABDUL SAMAD, PARAYULLAKANDIYIL VEEDU, KIZHAKKOTH AMSOM, PANOOR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT PIN-673 001. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAISURYA R2 BY ADV. SRI.B.HARISH KUMAR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.MC.No. 3218 of 2011() ------------------------------------ APPENDIX --------------- PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES --------------------------------------- ANNEXURE1. COPY OF THE CHARGE IN C.C. 625/10 BEFORE THE J.F.C.M.-1, THAMARASSERY. ANNEXUR-2. AFFIDAVIT SWORN TO BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT (DEFACTO COMPLAINANT). RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE: NIL ----------------------------------------- / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J ----------------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No. 3218 of 2011 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 22nd September, 2011. O R D E R Petitioners are the accused. The offences alleged against the accused are under Sections 406 and 498(A) r/w Sec 34 IPC. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the second respondent (de facto complainant) that the parties have amicably settled the matter out of court. An affidavit to that effect has been filed by the second respondent. Second respondent is represented by an Advocate engaged by her. Since the dispute is purely personal concerning their family matter, further proceedings in C.C.625/2010 pending on the file of the JFCM-1, Thamarassery is quashed. N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE smvd