CRM No. M-19205 of 2011 (1) In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-19205 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 6.7.2011 Rajinder Kumar ..... Petitioner vs The State of Haryana ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Jyoti Parshad Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who is an accused in FIR No. 445 dated 9.6.2011, registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC at Police Station Civil Lines, Karnal. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is carrying on the business of finance. He got his firm registered for the same purpose. The complainants had taken a loan from the petitioner and the same was not returned. When the petitioner asked them to return the same, the present FIR was got registered. The receipts of the loan raised by the complainants had been produced on record. The case of the prosecution is that the complainants have been cheated by the petitioner and Mahi Pal by promising to get loan of ` 10,00,000/- each sanctioned to them and for that purpose the money was taken from them. Some blank documents were got signed from the complainants on which the receipts have been prepared. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, considering the fact that the petitioner is in the business of finance and the transaction in question can be said to be a loan transaction, though not recording any finding on the merits of the case as the same may affect the case of either CRM No. M-19205 of 2011 (2) of the parties, I do not find that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required. The petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 18.7.2011 at 10.00 a.m. and subsequently as and when called. However, in case of arrest, he shall be released on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. He shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. 6.7.2011 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge