1 cri-wp-837-10 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 837 OF 2010 Ramsubhash Sukku Yadav .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents Mrs. Sonia S. Miskin for petitioner. Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for State. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. JULY 28, 2010. P.C. Heard Mrs. Miskin, the learned appointed Advocate for the petitioner. The petitioner has not yet completed the actual imprisonment of 12 years and, therefore, his case cannot be considered for remission as of now. As per the GR dated 11/4/2008 in cases of life convicts covered under the guide-lines, the process of review commences after completion of 12 2 cri-wp-837-10 years of actual imprisonment and, therefore, there is no merit in the prayer made by the petitioner. Hence, the petition is rejected. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)