r!,?~ SiH|K Attich A' .a-. IN THE HIGH COURT ( JUMGATURE AT fflLASPUR. CfiHATTISGARH PETITIONER WRIT PETmON N0. ^f--?^/ /2004 Madan Lal Sahu, S/o Late Sfari Shayaffl Lal SsSaa, Aged )out 48 years ,Preseatly ^y. <%€ .c^ R/o Bagdehi para, Nawa para Rajim, District Raipur, C.G. <6S BESPONDENTS c' »':\'v, ^"?'1 •^^ ^- ••.^ss^ ^\* i-'i'. c.w'" viEaRsus L State ofChhattisgarh Tfaroy^i the Secretary, Department ofRevenue, Mantralaya, DK.S. phawaa, Raipur (C.G.)- 2.TlieSecretary CnQvemment ofChfaattisgarh, Department ofGeneral Admmistratfon.Mantralaya, DK.S. Bfaawan, Rsdpw (C.G.) 3. Stateof NaifeyaPradesh Thn5ugh BieS^ci^tary, DqiartmentefOeneral Admimsto-atioB, Vallabh Bhawan, opal, (M.P.) 4. Union oflndia, Ttirough the Secretary, Department ofPersonnel & Tramiag, 3 Roor, Lok Nayak Bfaawan, Khaii Maricet, NewOeBu 5. TheCoUector. raiamtari,C.G. / V. isie(il KK!\ !9iS: ^ XI-HC-22 sn^rw R-li'=b3I1^T StllRigficT i^y / ^7 S4W<1" 05 ~^ ^ €v a^ ^TpiTcpr, gTf^ms, Iqciiuy 3TT^Tq^7 *<IHWI sh<<icn \V^ 200^ Rl'b^l 3ll^l6'W11Wtrf^(T 12-4-S On a mentton being made Mr. YashwantSahu, Adv^cate appears on behatf of Mr. Satyendra Sahu, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Akhil Agrawal, Panel and5. Heard both the counsel. The petitioner; who is wo writ petiBon being aggrieved by tl been promoted whereas,his junic^s have been promoted. Learned-counset for the pletitionersubmits that the petitioner may be allowed to make a representeti Agrawal; learned Panel Lawye objection. Having heard teamed cou facts and circumstances of the raisingall his grievances, and in the represenfaUon made by Ui^ objecUve manner after consid^ accordance with law. With the direction aforesait Parties are enUtled fbr certi <:ni<lfc'l<n-f *fl*'lCTTffte^t'<RlWI<. ^isri^irsn^r |the case is taken upfor heanng Lawyer for ttie State/respondents No.1, 2 king as Naib Tehsildar, has preferred this le aclion ofthe respondente ttiat he has not n to respondent hto.2 to which Mr. AkhH for the State of ChhatBsgarh has no ise) for the parties and having r^ard fo the case, the peiitioner isailowed to make a detailed representation to resp<(ndent No.2 wfthin two weeks from today um, respondent No.2 is directedtoconsider petithaner and decide the same within a period of three months from the <|late ofthe recelpt ofthe representaUon in an ing the grievances of tte peltfioner, in , the pefltionsfands disposedof. Consoquendy, M>(W.)P.l^o.5042Q004 and IA.hto.9474^004 ateo stand disposed of. ied copy ofthis order. Sd/- -C. Bhadoo Judge i f;-::ti"T;n!" 7si-fT~T ^nl:.:-t; •SfSffif'sSsSa^S^S'