HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIV1SION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLESHRIRAJEEVGUPTA,CJ. HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. WRIT PETITION No. 3858 of 2006 (PUBLIC INTEREST LmGATION ^ PETITIONERS 1 Rajkumar Bharti, son of Ghanshyam Bharti, aged about 29 years, resident of Ward No.1, Naya Mohalla, Hamalpara, Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh 2 Ghirdhari Gabel, son of Laxmi Prasad Gabet, aged about 35 years, resident of Thakurdia Ward No.18, Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. The District Collector, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh). 2. The Municipal Council of Kharsia, Raigarh, through-lts Chief Municipal Officer. 3 Rangoo Mohormati Yadav, son of Shri Ravi Lal Yadav, Resident of Khareia, Distrtet Raigarh (C.G.). 4 Nathoo Ram, son of Sair Saarthi, resident of Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). 5 Sohau Das, son of Shri Dev Nath Panikka, resident of Kharsra, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Present: Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, tearned DeputyA.G. forthe State/ respondent No.1. Shri S.R.J. Jaiswal, learned counsel for respondent No2. Shri Amit Sharma, learned counsel Tor respondents No.3to5. s; 53 ORDER (12th November, 2009) The fotlowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Leamed counsel for the parties are heard. 2) The petitioners have filed this writ petition styled as 'Public Interest Litigation' for the following reliefs: The petitioners, most humbly pray that the Hon'ble Court be kindly pleased to grant the following relief(3): 7.1 To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned atlotment order dated 13.7.2006, passed by the Respondent No.1. 7.2 To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the Respondents not to initiate or adopt any course of action pursuant to the impugned order. 7.3 To issue any other order or direction, which the Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case." 3) The petitioners, thus in substance, are seeking quashing of the impugned allotment order dated 13.07.2007 (Annexure P/1), passed by respondent No.1 - Collector, Raigarh whereby three houses constnrcted under 'Atal Awas Yojana' in Kharsia, District Raigarh were allotted to respondents No.3 Rangoo Mohormati Yadav, No.4 Nathoo Ram, No.5 Sohau Das, on the ground that respondentNo.1 has committed illegalities/ irregularities In the above allotment. ' -^ ^ 4) For ascertaining the correctness of the allegations made by the petitioner against respondent No.1, a 'Fact Finding Enquiry' would be necessary. 5) In the opinion of this Court, such a "Fact Findlng Em|uiry' can be better conducted by 'Lok Aayog'. 6) Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, learned counsel for he peUtioners, at this stage, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty of filing an appropriate application/ complaint before 'Lok Aayog' for the redressal of the petitioners' grievances projected in the writ petition. 7) Permission granted. 8) With the above liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 9) The security amount of Rs.5,CX)0/- deposited by the petitionerebej'efunded to the petitioners immediately.^ Sd,/- ChiefJustice > Sd/- Sunii KumarSinha Judge subbu