H CORAM: HI©HCOURT OF CHHATriSOARH AT fflLASPUR DJVISIONBENCH Hon'ble Shri Jagdish Bhalla Ag, CJ& Hon'ble Shri DHtp Raosahefe Deshmykh J. APPELLANTS CLAIMANTS M. A. (ClNa6®2OF 2007 1. 2. Vs. RESPONDENTS 1. NQNAPPUCANTS 2. 3. Appeat under Section Ramu S/o Jagu Ram aged about ^) years caste Malar (Soni) UlawaU W/o Ramu Rara aged about 45 years. Both are Resident of Vitlage Dw«rikapur P/S Ramanyjnagar Tahsil Surajpur, Distl. Surguja (C.G.) Chmal Sai S/o Ali Ram aged abeut 52 ^ars cast&^owar ocGUpation agriculture. (Owner) Ram Naresh S/o Shri Sai aged aboyt 25 years casteKanwar Occupation agricutture (Driver) Respondent N0.1&2 are reskterrt of Vill. Bundia Chowki Bhatgaon Tah. SurajpurDJstt. Surguja(C.G.) The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Through - Branch Marw^er, ManendfagarhRoadACTiNkapvr.DIstt. Surguja (C.G.) (Insurer) Present: None appears for the appellante. ORALORDER (Passedon 10 July,2007) The following wal order of the Court was passed t^ GSItp Raosaitodb ®eshmuk(i,J. When this csvse was catted out on 9^ Juty, 20Q7 non& appeared on 1 beh^tlf of the gppellante. Even today i.e.lGP' Jyty, 2,007 when the ©aseis cafled out again no r^presentation was made on behatf of the appeUai'ite. hi^» i? \^..: None appeared for the petiUoner to inform us whether the arguing counsel is tll orotherwise noranyapplication foradjustment has been made. Thisappeal arises out of an award dated 15.02.2007 passed by the Motor Accldent Claim Tribunal, Surajpur (henceforth the Tribunal') in Claim Case No.40/2005 whereby compensation of Rs.2,25,400/- was awarded to the clalmants for the accidental death of their unmarried son Shobhit Ram who at the retevant time was aged about 26yeare and was working as a labourer in a remote area of Tahslt Surajpur District Suiguja. Asseroing the daily income of the deceased atRs.70/- per da^ and ttie monthly income at Rs.2100/- the Tribunal has awarded compensation under the foltowing heads:" a. Lossofdependeney Rs.2,18,400/-. b. Funeratexpenses Rs.2CKX)/- c. Loss of love and affection Rs.SOOO/- Total Rs.2,25.40Cy-. We are of the considcired oplnion that compensation awaided by the Tribunal is justand reasonabte and catls for no interference. ^cordingty, the appeal is dismissed at tiie stage of admtsslon itself. Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice Karyna Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ft& ^ f('