IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46404 of 2009 ANIL KAHAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR 3 27.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the fresh Stamp Report, as contained in file of Cr.Misc. no. 39550 of 2009. By order dated 13th November, 2009 passed in Cr.Misc. no. 39550 of 2009, petitioner had been granted bail. However, it is stated on behalf of the petitioner that Paraiya P.S. Case no.06 of 1998 had been stated in place of Guraru P.S. Case no. 06 of 1998 in paragraph no.1 as well as in prayer portion of the same bail application, that led to the reflection of wrong Police Case in the bail order. It is further submitted that the Sessions Trial is stated in paragraph no.1 as well as in the prayer portion that is same as stated in the order of the learned Sessions Judge, Gaya, while rejecting the bail application. That apart Guraru P.S. Case no.06 of 1998 stands stated in the copy of first information report also. In that view of the matter, let the order dated 13.11.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 39550 of 2009 be deemed to have been passed with respect to Guraru P.S. Case no.06 of 2 1998. The order dated 13.11.2009 stands modified to the aforesaid extent. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) AAhmad