IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3251 OF 2007 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3251 OF 2007 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3251 OF 2007 Vimal Vitthal Nagare ...Plaintiff vs. Atul V. Raorane ...Defendant Mr.R.C. Kaushik for the Plaintiff. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : AUGUST 30, 2008 DATED : AUGUST 30, 2008 DATED : AUGUST 30, 2008 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard Counsel for the plaintiff. 2. The plaintiff has filed affidavit of service. He submits that the defendant was served with writ of summons and he has not filed his vakalatnama within 10 days from the date of service. He has filed affidavit of documents. Original documents are taken on record and marked Exhibit A (colly). He has filed compilation of original documents. 3. In view of the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 3(6)(a), the plaintiff is entitled for a judgment and decree with costs in terms of para 14(a). Refund of Court fees is permitted as per Rules. 4. Suit is, accordingly, disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)