IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2007 / 21ST CHAITHRA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 331 of 2007(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENt IN W.P.C.NO.28214/2006 Dated 06/11/2006 .................... PETITIONER: ----------------- THULASIKUMAR, S/O.PRAHLADAN, AGED 40 YRS ADVOCATE, PARVIN STUDIO BUILDINGS, MAITHANAM VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.RAJESH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1.MEENAKUMARI, D/O.SUBRAHMANINA PILLAI, AGED 33 YEARS, MUNCIPAL SECRETARY, VARKALA MUNCIPALITY, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. *ADDL.R2.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ATTINGAL. *ADDL.R2 IS IMPLEADED SUO MOTU VIDE JUDGMENT DATED 11.4.2007. R1 BY ADV. SRI.J.S.AJITH KUMAR,SC. SRI.S.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/04/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cont.Case (C)No.331 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 11th April, 2007 JUDGMENT The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Attingal is impleaded suo motu as additional 2nd respondent in this case. Registry will carry out necessary corrections in the cause title. 2. Mr.J.S.Ajith Kumar, counsel for the 1st respondent- Municipality submits that it was because of the order of stay which had been passed by this court in W.P.C.No.5215/07 that the directions in the judgment could not be complied with. Learned counsel has now placed before me a copy of the detailed order by which the above stay order has been vacated. Now it is clear that no impediments whatsoever to comply with the directions in the judgment. The Contempt of Court Case will stand closed directing the respondents to implement the directions in Annexure-I judgment. The additional 2nd respondent is directed to render all assistance which may be sought for by the Secretary of the 1st respondent-Municipality for implementing the directions in Annexure-I judgment. The additional 2nd respondent will take appropriate action on the application already submitted by the Secretary of the 1st respondent- Municipality in that regard. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE W.P.C.No. - 2 -