1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2458 OF 2009 Savita Dilip Kathe ..Petitioner Versus Reserve Bank of India & Ors. ..Respondents None for the Petitioner. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2009. P.C. : 1. None for the petitioner even at the second call. The dismissal of the Writ Petition in default invariably results in restoration application which is normally granted. This creates strain on the Registry. 2. Left with no other alternative, we went through the Writ Petition. The petitioner is challenging the action of the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 under Section 32 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The petitioner has an alternate remedy available under the provisions of the said Act. In this view of the mater, we are not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition. 3. Apart from the above, the Writ Petition was filed somewhere in the month of February, 2009. Almost for a period of 9 months, the Petition is pending without obtaining any circulation and without seeking any urgent relief. In the above 2 circumstances, dismissal will not come in the way of the petitioner to approach alternate remedy, if advised. 4. The Writ Petition is dismissed. 5. All rival contentions on merits are kept open. (A.A. Sayed, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)