,'l-atK'lft3,^ ' '!il.ti6);.t IN THB HIGH COUR-I' OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR ti.lia-E: •T "•"'""••^ .11; ^ySSs' Writ Petition No. 158 of2004 Petitioner K. S. Tomar, S/o V. S. Tomar, aged about 44 yrs. Incharge Principal, Govt Polytechnic CoUege, Ambikapur, Distt. Suiguja (CG). Versus Respondents 1. State of Ctdiattisgarli, through Secrctaiy, Techiucal Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Building Raipur, Ctihatisgarh. Director, Tecluiical Education, Women's Polytechaic CoUege premises, Baren Bazar Raipur, Chtiattisgarh. N. K. Buwadey, tecturer (Miuing) Govt. Polytechiiic College, Ambikapiir, Distt. Suiguja, Chhattisgarh. 2. 3. WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AgmJtiotri J.) Shri P. Diwakar, Senior Advocate with Shri Ashish Suraaa, Advocate for the petitioaer. Shri Paukaj Shrivastava, Paael Lawyer for the respondents No. 1 and 2. Shri J. S. Barik, Advocate tbr fhe respondent No.3. OR_OBR (Passed on tbis 10th Day ofPebmaiy, 2009) The petitioner bas filed fhis pctition chaUeiigiag fhc order dated 9.1.2004 (Annexure P/l), whereby the diawiag and disbursiug powers givcn to the petitioner by order dated 5.7.2002 were witfadTanpn and the sanie werc given to the respondent No.3. Leamed counsel appearing Ibr fhe Tespondents No. 1 aud 2/ State subxmts that Stari B. K. Goyal has been appointed as Incliaige Prmcipal ia Govt. Polytecluiic College, Axnbikapur by order dated 3.10.2005 (Aiuiexure R/6) aad by order dated 15.6.2006 (Annexure R/7), fbe petitioner has been trausferred % on . deputation to Clihattisgarh Adivasi Vikas Samiti, Ambikapur as District PrograiBaie Manager. After baving been appointed as Inchai^e Principal, the drawing and disbursmg power, wluch vests wifh the Principal, were given to Shri Goyal. 3. The petitioner, by this petition, seeks a reUef that the order dated 5.7.2002, wbereby the petitiouer was graated drawmg aad disbiu-sing adxiiinlsteative power may be restored back. I do not uaderstand the subxuission of the petitioner asto how a Lecturer, who was given drawing and disbursiag power as tiiae gape arraagement, ia normal course can be given such powers, even on transfer, wtuch vests witti the Prtncipal, whosoever be is, either as regular or Inchai^e. 4. In view of the foregoing, tbe petition is merit-less and there is no semblaace of any legal or statutory right available to the pctitioner. Thus, fhe petition is dismissed. No order asto costs. SA'- SatisbK.Agnihom ") ,::'^ :^9 F"