C.Rev. No.59 of 2009 09.05.2011 Present: Mr.Atul Jhingan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Gurpreet Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr.R.K.Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr.Rajinder Dogra, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The present review petition has been preferred against the judgment / order dated 9.10.2009 passed in Arb.Case No.29 of 2009, where the appointment of an Advocate / Arbitrator, of this Court was made in presence of learned counsel for the petitioner as well as in presence of learned counsel for respondent No.2. The present review petition has been filed by learned counsel for the petitioner (counsel of respondent No.2 in Arb.Case No.29 of 2009) on the ground that the order / judgment in question dated 9.10.2009 was passed behind his back without his consent, as such, the said order is to be reviewed in the light of the judgment dated 16.7.2010 passed in Civil Review No.60 of 2009 titled as Amit Singla Versus HP Agro Industries Corporation Ltd. & Another by this Court (Hon'ble Justice R.B.Misra, Judge), where the order passed for appointing of an Arbitrator in an Arbitration Case, could be reviewed by the High Court. It has not been indicated that the said judgment dated 16.7.2010, passed in Civil Review No.60 of 2009 was set aside by Hon'ble Supreme Court. As submitted by the learned counsel for the parties, the present review petition is also to be disposed of in terms of the above order. Accordingly, in the light of judgment dated 16.7.2010, passed in Civil Review No.60 of 2009 (Amit Singla Versus HP Agro Industries Corporation Ltd. & Another), the order / judgment dated 9.10.2009 passed in Arb.Case No.29 of 2009 is reviewed with an observation that the Arb.Case No.29 of 2009 for appointment of an arbitrator shall be heard afresh on its merits by Hon'ble the Chief Justice or by another Judge allocated at the pleasure of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. The judgment dated 16.7.2010 passed in Civil Review No.60 of 2009 shall form part of this judgment. Review petition is accordingly allowed. (R.B. Misra), J. 9th May, 2011 (Purohit)