:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 780 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 627 OF 2007 Madhukar Raghunath Surve and ors. ..Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Ms. Manjula Rao for applicants. Mr. D.P. Adsule, APP for respondent-State. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. Date : July 12, 2007. Date : July 12, 2007. Date : July 12, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard Ms. Rao the learned counsel for the applicants, whose Criminal Appeal No. 627 of 2007 has been admitted today against the order of conviction and sentence. . Having regards to the reasoning set out by the learned trial Judge in the order of conviction and sentence, I am satisfied that the applicant nos.1 and 2 who are both senior citizens and parents of the :2: applicant no.3- husband of the deceased girl deserve to be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal by suspending the order of sentence under Section 389 of Cr.P.C. . Hence, the application is partly allowed and it is directed that the applicant nos.1 and 2 be released on same bail as in the trial court but on furnishing fresh bonds. . So far as the applicant no.3 is concerned, he may apply independently for being released on bail after the R & P is received. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)