IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21787 of 2011 Laxami Panjiyar Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. ----------- 02/- 22/07/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. However, as submitted, he still intends to resume and continue the matrimonial relationship with the complainant for which he has already filed one Matrimonial Case bearing No. 37 of 2010 before the Principal Judge, Sitamarhi under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. To further, strengthen his intention an offer is being made to pay a sum of Rs. 500/- (five hundred only) per month to the complainant by way of interim maintenance, subject to any order on the point by the competent court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on the event of filing an application before the court below stating such intentions as stated above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the petitioner, namely, Laxami Panjiyar, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Complaint Case No. 573 of 2010, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each 2 and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation or on single default in payment, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)