IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 28TH JULY 2009 / 6TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 21144 of 2009(K) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ M/S.K.A.KARIM & SONS, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER A.JAFFER, M.C.NO.10, MUNDAKKAL WEST, KOLLAM. BY MR.V.CHITAMBARESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE MR.T.C.SURESH MENON MR.JIBU P THOMAS MR.P.S.APPU MR.NIMOD A.R MR.C.A.ANOOP RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ASSMT.), COMMERCIAL TAXES, SPECIAL CIRCLE, KOLLAM. 3. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY) KOLLAM. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. GOVT. PLEADER MR.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ........................................................................ W.P.(C) No.21144 OF 2009 ......................................................................... Dated this the 28th July, 2009 J U D G M E N T The case of the petitioner is that the benefits payable on availing the Amnesty Scheme declared by the Government have not been fully extended to the petitioner and that the grievances have already been projected in Ext.P6 representation preferred before the second respondent, which is stated as still pending. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court does not propose to go into the merits of the case including as to the scope and applicability of Section 55 (c) of the K.G.S.T. Act and as to the manner of appropriation of the amount stated as effected by the petitioner. The second respondent is hereby directed to consider Ext.P6 representation presented by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. W.P.(C) No.21144 OF 2009 2 The above exercise shall be finalised by the second respondent as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of copy of the judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk