1 1 S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.4619/2009 Sukhvindra Singh Vs. The State of Rajasthan DATE OF ORDER : 17th December 2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr.H.S.Shrimali,for the petitioner. Mr.Anil Joshi,Public Prosecutor for State. .... BY THE COURT The learned counsel for the petitioner has again made a request for adjournment in this matter that has been declined today as this bail application, filed way back on 07.09.2009, has remained pending yet with several adjournments on 11.09.2009, 18.09.2009, 13.10.2009 and 17.11.2009. Now, the learned counsel submits that the challan papers have been received by him today and has placed the copies of the challan papers for perusal before the Court. The learned counsel submits that quantity allegedly recovered from the petitioner is merely 115 grams of opium and charge-sheet has already been filed; and the petitioner, being in custody since 28.08.2009, deserves indulgence at this stage. After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor and after having examined the challan papers, it is noticed that the contraband (115 grams opium) had been recovered from the possession of the 2 petitioner and the allegations are that he was trading in the opium while sitting on the Dhaba. In the totality of circumstances, at this stage, this Court does not find it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application moved on behalf of the petitioner Sukhvindra Singh s/o Sohan Singh under Section 439 Cr.P.C. stands rejected. (DINESH MAHESHWARI),J. s.soni