CWP(T) No. 4722/2008 (OA 2222/97) 20.04.2010 Present: Ms. Sulochana Kaundal, Advocate, vice Mr. O. P. Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. M. Bisht, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. L. N. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. In this petition the petitioner in effect has challenged the appointment of respondent No. 4 as a part time water carrier in Government Primary School, Sharog. However, in the main prayer clause there is no relief to the said effect. The petitioner is seeking appointment as a part time water carrier under the scheme of the respondent-State. The respondents in their reply have taken a categorical stand that the petitioner’s father has a shop in village Thachi. He also has agricultural land in village Thachi and Sharog falling in Patwar Circle, Bajhol (Thachi) and as such the petitioner is not eligible under the scheme. There is no affidavit controverting the said fact on record. That apart the State has explained, by placing on record the certificates issued by the authorities that respondent No. 4 is not only fully eligible but also entitled to be selected under the scheme as he belongs to I.R.D.P. family. Hence there is no merit in the present petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. April 20, 2010 (PK)