IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.7089 of 2010 SAHEB THAKUR, son of Narad Thakur Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 04.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 371 and 374/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the Child Labour (Prevention and Regulation) Act, 1986. It has been stated in the First Information Report that three girls were being forced to work without food and adequate salary, for which the petitioners have remained in custody since 13.11.2009 and there is no previous history of this kind of case against him. In view of the aforementioned facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Raxaul Rail P.S. case no.20 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner,(ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his - 2 - release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, and (iv) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)