1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3397 of 2010. Decided on: 8.7.2010. Roshan Lal ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitender P. Ranote, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Anup Rattan, Central Govt. Counsel for respondent No.3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): Writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: (A) “Writ of Mandamus may kindly be issued thereby directing the respondents to re-fix the pension of the petitioner by taking into account the period of ad-hoc service”. 2. It is submitted that the petitioner has already made representation Annexure P-2 and the same is now pending before the second respondent. It is submitted that in view of decision of this Court in Uma Dutt Sharma vs. State of H.P. Latest HLJ 2009(2) HP 1268 which has been implemented by the State, the petitioner is entitled to fixation of pension by counting the period of 2 ad-hoc service rendered by the petitioner followed by regular service. There will be a direction to first respondent to consider and pass orders on Annexure P-2, adverting to the submissions made by the petitioner in the representation within a period of three months from the date of production of the copy of the judgment alongwith copy of the writ petition and this judgment referred to above by the petitioner. If petitioner requests for personal hearing the same shall be also granted. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications. Copy dasti ( Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. ( Kuldip Singh), Judge. July 8, 2010 (sks/grs)