IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 5366 of 2011 alongwith connected matters. Decided on: 18.7.2011 1. CWP No. 5366 of 2011 Vedmitter ....Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another …Respondents 2. CWP No. 5367 of 2011 Sunil Dutt ....Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another …Respondents 3. CWP No. 5374 of 2011 Dev Swaroop ....Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another …Respondents 4. CWP No. 5375 of 2011 Lalit Kumar Sharma ....Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another …Respondents 5. CWP No. 5376 of 2011 Chandi Parsad ....Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another …Respondents 6. CWP No. 5377 of 2011 Bhim Dutt ....Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another …Respondents 7. CWP No. 5378 of 2011 Gia Lal Sharma ....Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another …Respondents 8. CWP No. 5385 of 2011 Aradhana ....Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another …Respondents 9. CWP No. 5386 of 2011 Santosh ....Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another …Respondents The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Rupinder Singh, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) This issue pertaining to vacation salary to contract teachers is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court rendered in Baldev Singh and others versus State of H.P. and others, CWP No. 415 of 2000, decided on 1st September, 2008 and the judgment has become final. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondents to release eligible vacation salary, during the entire service period, to the petitioners in case the same has not been granted so far, within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition(s) and a copy of the judgment, referred to above by the petitioner(s). If the amounts are not disbursed as above, the petitioners will be entitled to interest @ 10% and the officers responsible for the delay shall be personally liable for the same. 2. The pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice July 18, 2011 (Justice V.K. Ahuja) (hl) Judge