WPSS 1643/2001 (Old No. 29914 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Sri Rahul Counsel, Advocate holding brief of Sri N.S. Pundir, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no. 2 & 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners stated that the petition on behalf of the petitioner no. 2 has been rendered infructuous as the appointment of the petitioner has been regularized. In view of the above statement, the petition of the petitioner no. 2 is dismissed as infructuous. So far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned, he is a driver and is continuing since last 14 years, out of which after July 1999, he is continuing in terms of the order dated 23.7.1999 of the Court. Therefore, considering the long length of service rendered by the petitioner no. 1, the respondents are directed to regularize her services. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (P.C.V., J.) 30.7.2008 Prabodh