(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 880 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 880 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 880 OF 2004 Saibai Dattatray Medane & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Rajkumar Shantilal Munot & Ors. ...Respondents ..... Mr. Rameshkumar Gite h/f Anilkumar Patil, counsel for Petitioners. Mr.C.M.Kothari, counsel for Respondents 1,2, 4 to 8. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 28TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 28TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 28TH FEBRUARY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- . It is evident that consequent to the impugned order of allowing amendment, the petitioners have already filed amended written statement and therefore, at this stage, the challenge to the impugned order need not be gone into. The petition is, therefore, disposed of as infructuous. Ad-interim order stands vacated.