HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Pe$£tien (S) N0. 3974 6f2%8 Subhash Chandra Daherwal, S/o Shri Puneshwar Prasad Daharwal, Aged 51 years, occupation Service, working as Horticuiture Devei‘opment Officer, R/o Bhatapara, Raipur (CG). VERSUS PETETKONER @mQEE§ : 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Department of Horticuiiure, Manti‘alaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG)- 2. Directer, Department of Horticulture, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). 3. Deputy Directer, Department of Herticulture, Biiaspur (CG). (mar PE'mioN UNDER ARTICLE 225 OF THE CONSTHUHON OF mum) (SB: Hon‘bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihom, J.) Present : Shri Rajeev Shrivastava., Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORAL ORBER (l’aesea am thiS 24m aay of Jnly, 2&98) 1. With the consent ot'the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing tinaily. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petitron on merit at this stage. However, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the concerned authoritywithin a period of three days and the same may be ctirected to be considereci and decided, in accordance with law, within the prescribed time. 3. Shri Thakur. learnegi counsel appearing for the State, submits that if the representation is made by the petitioner, the same shall be decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law. on its own merits, within a period oftwo weeks from the date ofreceipt of representation. 4. Shri Thakur further submits that no coercive steps shalt be taken, tiil the disposal ot‘the representation. 5. in view of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of, No order asto costs. / Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ' A