^^ 2N THE KEQH C©WTQP JUBICATORE OP CHHATTIS0ARH AT^ILASPUR, NRZT PET2T20N N0./39f /2003 J -^i T'';^ \ ^. i< PETXTIONER .^ss^ ..^^ •^^' » tTergnarayan ®m®f^hanusdhari aged ^32 years cherwa fcyy caste chief prlest and preaident ©£ ptAjari Baiga ^e.i^Gl a^mitfeee iGii<3arga3rh resid^nt of vtllage Kudargarh Babhgna posb Udgi Tahsil surajpur Distfe Sarguja (c«0t) VERSUS ^ RESPONOE5NTS $ UL) Sfeate of chhafetisgarh through chief Seerefesry D«K,S» Bhawan Rai^ur^ ^ y^' 2) oolleator Sarguja Ambikapur, Distt Sarguja chhafetisgarh, 3) shri Bh^ny pratap Singh M»L»A» Ass^mbly constitu^ncy Surajpur resident o£ village A^agaon poat Salhi Tahsil Swrajpur Disfefe^ Sarguja IchhafetisgarhX. jg 4) sub-Div.i.siorr'al Offieer (R@v^iu@) surajpur ©istfe.Sarguja (C.Gi) ^- ^ 5) cheif exeaufeive Offiaexk <7^npad 7 paichQyat Odgi Tahsil Si@irajp<ar Disfct. Sa^guja (chhsttisgarb), -•^ ^ miT PETITION UNDE^ ARTICI<E__22^/227 Qy^tHE CONSTXTXJT20N FOR ISSUANCE OS> WRIT.WRITS ORDER,©»DgRSDXRECTXON,DIREX2TIONS V..; ^ Q HIGHCQURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILA8PUR WRIT PETITION N0.1Q41 QF 2003 PETITIONER RESPDNDENTS Jagnarayan Versus State of Chhatti^garh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri,J. Present:- Shri J.S. Baraik, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. 1. 2. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 22nd day ofJuly, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitionersubmits that the petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of the resolution dated 2-4-2003, which admittedly is in the nature of recommendation, thereaffer order has been passed, which could not be challenged in this petition, Thus, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the ground of new cause of action, which eould not bechallenged in this petition, to which learned counsel appearing for the State hasno objection. ACcordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Consequently, interim order passed earlier, if any, stands vacated. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge II