IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P. (T) No. 6251 of 2008 Decided on: 8th September, 2010 Sunder Singh Bakshi and others Petitioners Versus State of H.P and others Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge For the Petitioners: Mr. Vishal Bindra, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General __________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioners approached this court with certain grievances regarding recovery from their emoluments/salary. The recovery was effected on the ground of unauthorized payments by way of conveyance allowance. According to the petitioners, conveyance allowance is permissible. But, according to respondent No. 4, the petitioners had not produced any evidence regarding the entry in the log book. It is also stated that recovery was effected based on the direction issued by respondents No. 1 to 3. If that be so, it is for the petitioners to approach the second respondent. In the event of petitioners approaching the second respondent, by way of appropriate representations, the matter will be duly considered by the second respondent/first respondent and appropriate action in accordance with law will be taken thereon within another four months. The writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice ( Justice Kuldip Singh ), September 8, 2010(K) Judge