IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13236 of 2011 Raghunath Prasad Versus Smt. Anjali Devi & Ors ---------------------------------- 02. 16.08.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the defendant No.1 against the order dated 25.05.2011 as contained in Annexure 3 passed by Subordinate Judge 4th Munger in Title Suit No.58 of 2001 whereby the learned Court below directed for calling for the thumb impression register from District Sub Registrar Office, Munger for comparing the thumb impression of Chandrakala Devi appearing in the register with disputed memorandum of partition. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that earlier the prayer was made and the register was also produced by the Sub Registrar Office which remained pending for three and a half years but the photo could not be taken and the register was taken back by the District Sub Registrar, Munger on 10.06.2010. Thereafter, the plaintiff filed the application for calling for the same - 2 - again on the ground that earlier the photocopy could not be taken. As such application has been allowed by the Court below. From the facts stated above, it appears that no rights of the parties have been decided nor any illegality has been committed by the Court below. I, therefore, find no reason to interfere with the impugned order and accordingly, this application is dismissed. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)