1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.302/2010. (Nandkishore Agrawal and Ors. Vs. The State of Mah. And Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.BS Shinde, Adv. For petitioners; Mr.VB Ghatge, AGP for State; *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 26 th November, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) Hasty exercise by the revenue authorities in complying the order dated 11.2.2010 causing mutation in respect of Survey No.93/2, deleting name of petitioner and putting it in the name of Police Colony, Balapur, being violative of the directions of the learned Member, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Aurangabad, dated 12.3.2010, are complained to be breached of. 3) I have gone through the affidavit in reply. Though the deponent has tried to explain the meaning of status quo, however, the entire order ought to have been taken into consideration. The period for preferring a revision being of two months, it was expected of the 2 authorities to wait from 11.2.2010 for a period of two months. However, they have demonstrated, as stated above, extraordinary zeal in discharging their obligation. Though such zeal is normally not demonstrated at any other place, this is so done. In spite of such exercise, I find that it could not be branded to be breached of orders of learned Member of the MRT dated 12.3.2010. 4) The contempt petition lacks merit, dismissed. 5) Learned AGP will inform the authorities concerned that it is not their personal litigation to demonstrate hostility to the petitioner. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/