FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.451 OF 2008 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr.S.M.Kamble, for the petitioner. CORAM: D.B.Bhosale,J. DATED: 21.02.2008 P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ petition arises from the orders in the RTS proceedings passed by the revenue authorities. It is apparent that the last order of the Additional Commissioner dated 14.12.2006 is based on the findings recorded by the civil court in Regular Civil Suit No.63 of 1995, which was filed by Vinayak Joshi, respondent no.1, against the petitioner and others. This position has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The Commissioner, while disposing of the revision, has also made it clear that the orders passed in the instant proceedings would be subject to outcome of the decision in the civil suit, if any, filed by the petitioner for adjudication of his right and it is always open for the petitioner to approach the revenue authorities afresh on the basis of the judgment of the civil court. I find no reason to interfere with such order in the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is dismissed. (D.B.Bhosale, J.)