IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.18429 of 2003 Between : Khaghas Nagar Municipality rep.by its Chairperson, Kaveti Saileela District Adilabad, A.P. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Director of the Municipal, Administration, A.P(Hyderabad). 2 The Regional Director-cum-Appellate Commissioner, Municipal Administration, Warangal. 3 The District Collector, Adilabad. 4 The Principal Secretary to Govt. Municipal Administration and Urban, Development Department, Secretariat, A.P., Hyderabad. 5 T.V.RAMANA RAO S/O. T.NARSING RAO R/O. 1-16-658, WARD NO.20, KAGAZNAGAR, ADILABAD DISTRICT. R5 IS IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 26.09.2003 IN WPMP NO. 25245 OF 2003. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order, a direction or writ, more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the G.O.Ms.No.1024 M.A., dated 20-11- 1965 is illegal and opposed to principles of natural justice and unconstitutional being violative of Article 243-R and 243-ZF of constitution of India and consequentially set aside the order in R.O.C.No.11587/2003-G2 dated 27.6.2003 passed by 1st respondent as null and void and ultravires of Section 59(2) of the A.P.Municipalities Act 1965. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.K.MANIK PRABHU Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER : It is represented by the learned counsel for petitioner that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 2nd July 2009 ajr