( 1 ) wp2295.09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2295 OF 2009 Dnyandev s/o. Pandharinath Patil .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. Sanjay Kolhare, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.P. More, A.G.P. for respondent No.1. Mr. G.D. Kale, Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 & 4. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE & R.M. BORDE,JJ. DATED : 21.02.2011 P.C. :- 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. In this writ petition the petitioner has made following prayers :- "B] By appropriate writ or directions in the like nature or orders, the respondents No.2 i.e. Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Latur, may be directed to include the name of petitioner in waiting list of surplus teacher in accordance with Rule 25 (A) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private School (Condition of Service) Rules, 1981. ( 2 ) wp2295.09 C] Pending hearing and final disposal of the writ petition, the respondents No.2 i.e. Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Latur, may be directed to decide the representation dated 25.11.2008 within two weeks.” 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 - Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Latur, to decide his representation dated 25.11.2008, wherein he has made similar prayer as made in prayer clause "B" in the writ petition. In the circumstances, we are disposing of this writ petition by the following order :- i) Respondent No. 2-Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Latur, shall decide the representation dated 25.11.2008, made by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. If for any reason respondent No.2 is not inclined to grant the prayer made in the representation, he shall decide the representation after giving an opportunity of being ( 3 ) wp2295.09 heard to the petitioner. In any case, respondent No.2 shall communicate the decision to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of the decision. 3. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. [R.M. BORDE,J.] [D.B. BHOSALE,J.] snk/2011/FEB11/wp2295.09