IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 7595 of 2010. Decided on: December 15, 2010. Poonam Goel & Ors.. ….Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & anr. ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K.Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioners: Mr. Dinesh Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) It is jointly represented by the learned counsel for the parties that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Gauri Dutt and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh reported in Latest HLJ 2008 (HP) 366 and Mool Raj Upadhaya versus the State of Himachal Pradesh and others, reported in 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316. 2. Respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioners for grant of work charge status strictly in accordance with the principles laid down in Gauri Dutt and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh reported in Latest HLJ 2008 (HP) 366 and Mool Raj Upadhaya versus the State of Himachal Pradesh and others, reported in 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316 with all the consequential benefits. Needful be done within a period of four 2 months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition, by the petitioner concerned. 3. The Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. December 15, 2010. ( Justice V.K. Ahuja ), (vs) Judge.