IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 12TH OCTOBER 2010 / 20TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 31267 of 2010(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SREEDHARAN, VATTANILKUNNATHIL HOUSE, UDAYAKAVALA, KUREEKAD P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. SMT.SAROJINI, W/O.SREEDHARAN, VATTANILKUNNATHIL HOUSE, UDAYAKAVALA, KUREEKAD P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAVIKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERINGOME POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. SMT.B.NABEESA, D/O.ERUMULLAN, VADACHIRA HOUSE, PADIYATTCHAL P.O., PERINGOME, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.31267 OF 2010(G) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T In action in Exts.P5 and P6 complaint made by the petitioners is what is complained of in this writ petition. If as stated by the petitioner, the first respondent has not taken any action on Ext.P5 and P5, as held by the Apex Court in Sakisi Vasu V. State of UP (2008(2)SCC 408) the remedy of the petitioners is to move the Magistrate concerned. Therefore, the writ petition is misconceived and is dismissed without prejudice to the petitioner to approach the Magistrate Court. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/