7 w $mfi IN THE HIGH COURT OF' CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. lS) No. ‘ $7? é oiF 2010. mw g mg : 1. (“Maksudan Ram Sinha, S/o. Thanu Ram Sinha, aged about 52 years i t PETiITiRs ONE i x ,V A H 1‘ Head Master Govt M1ddle School Makardona Block Nagar1 D1str1ct Dhamtan (C. G.) f Kunwar 193 Sahu, S/o. Itwar‘i Ram Sahu, aged about 58 years, $ % Head Master, Govt. Middle Schdol Siyadehi, Block Nagari, District Dhamtari (C. G.) Budh Ram Sahu, S/o. Babu Ram Sahu, aged about 61 years, Head Master Govt Primary School Madam S1111 Block Nag , i District Dhamtarl (C. G.) /, Gulam Rasul Khan, S I /o. Ayan Mohd. Khan, i aged about 58 years Head Master Govt Mlddle School i Saraltola, Block Nagarl, District e Dharni tar (C. G. ) j\w- RESPONDENTS 5. Jagsh Ra‘ Sinha ‘S/o Sohan Lal Smha aged about 58 years Head Master Govt Prlmary School Jarhakha Block Nagarl Dhamtarl Dlstr1ct Dhamtan (C G ) ’ / _ 6. Lal Sai Saral, i S/o. Shri J:agat Rama aged about 61 years Head Master Govt Prlmary School Bamhanpall f Khars1ya, D1str1ct Ra1garh (C G ) X 7. Pat1ram Sahu S/o Pardesh1 Ram Sahu Head Master Govt Mlddle School Sarkada, Block Chhura, District Raipur (C. G.) /. Girvar lal Verma, S/ o Firatu‘ Ram Verma, aged about 57 years Head Master Ashram M1ddle School Dugah, Block Nagarr District Dhamtari (C. G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, *Through : The Secretary, ‘Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.s. Bhawan, Raiour (c. G.) di m r , ssistt Commissioner, ribal Welfare epartment, Damtari, District Dhamtari ( i / t Ralpur, District Raipur (C G ) g, Aan T D h c. G.) . i . . As51stant Comm1ss1oner Trlbal Welfare Departmen y, 4 Asistant Commissione, s r . ribal Wefare epartmen, aigar istrict igr c. G. RIT ETITION UNDER AICLE 226 O E UTION OF INDI T l Dt ‘ Rh, D Raah ( ) W P RT F TH CONSTIT A ‘ ‘ ERSUS “ ‘ RESPONDENTS : State of Chhamsgarh tit Others RIT PETITrON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ‘ K SB Hon ble Shn Satlsh K. Ag maa; » Present, i ’Shn Somkant Verma, Advocate for the itloners ‘ Shn N N Roy, Panel Lawyer for the Stahe/respondents ORAL ORDER (Passed on 03“ day of February, 2010) 1th the consent of learned counsel appearmg for the partxes, the petrtron 1s I heard finally Learned counsel appeanng for robatron Alter completlon of probauon penod th Vpetrtloners were granted .‘ regular pay scale of Rs 169-3 l “I the date of m1t1al tment The matter was taken up to‘the Supreme Cour - The appeal was dlsnussed by the upreme Court, upholdmg the decrsmn of the Tnbunal to the eEect that the Teachers/Assxstant Teachers are entitled to I regular pay scale from date of uutral appomtment I In vrew of the above submrssrons made by leamed counsel for the pames, the wnt petmon 1s d1sposed of m the same terms 1 é the petrtxoners are granted ‘l1berty to make a representation, 1f so advxsed, to consxder therr cases on Its own merit and m 1ts perspectlve Ifthe petltroners stand on the same footings as per order passed by the SAT m Madhukant Yadu (supra) and subsequently? confrrmed by the Supreme Court 1n Specxal Leave Petmon (Crvrl) No 6892/93 by order dated 3 1 1994 the petmoners may be entltled to“ ame rehef I accordmgly a I i V W m t W p 60 a' n t. l l a