PETITIONER RESPONDENTS .^•••t' ^".^•^-K ..-• / ^A ^^F^'"""^ .^ s IN THE COURT OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.t,;^, WRIT PETITION N0 .S.':'^..1200Q \0^ ^"' ^'^k',.\}3- Nandu S/o Late Shri Shivnath, Aged abour 56 yearworking as Gangman Department of P.W.D.R/o Dansara, Tah. Sarangarh Distt.Raigarh(C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works Department, Martralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 3. Superintending Engineer, PublieWorks Department, Bilaspur Division, Distt.Bilaspur(C.G.) 4. Executive Engineer, PublicWorks Department, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AWRIT IN THE NATURE OF IVIANDAMUS, PROHIBtTION, CERTIORARI ETC. ORANYOTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE WIATTER XI-HC-22 •ysf 'ttwi'^'it, ^vw, faiwy 3i1^?T 'V^ _ ' L.O.P'-MO,^^/-90^ • Wi»Sg,^,^———•"—--——-—-"Fp^ 200 '.!"' 'fa^5P' an^r^T 'feti^SlTCSi 3h*1iq) ^rfict ^: y'r La. p/ ^ sn^t'ffsiiWHfei '28-2-2006 Advocate Shri Sameer Behar, counsel forlthe Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. Ac|voc Application for urgent hearing 14 Heard. The petitioner has filed thi^ Constitution of India on the ground •his services have nottoeen reaularized Counse] forthe petitioner subrrjits since more than 25 years. He has fil^d petitioner is entitled to be regularizec( Annexure P-2 and Circulars Annext) dated 3-9-2002, !t is pointed out thaf made cQllectively and the same is penjdin'g have been regularized. 'ShFlifl^t7? ^f*^' ^ 1^T3t <^^R ^aiSTOsn^t petjtioner. for the SSate. aliowed. petition under Articles 226/227 of the th]at even after completing 25 years of service, thatthe petitioner is serving asGangman copy.of Service Book. He submits thatthe under the Gangmen's Service Rules, 1996 jre P-3 dated 9-4-2003 and Annexure P-4 \ representations as per Annexure P-6 were l.'lt is also pointed out that some persons Learned State counsel pointed petitioner is pendjng andthe samewii <|>ut that the representatipn submitted by the ibeconsidered and decided. : the Having considered and withoutj case, in the opinion of this Court, for direction is give'n to the petitioner to his grievances before ths respon.dent] of the petition and this order, withj representation being fiied, the compet^nt the same on its own merits in accordince within three months from the date of made clear that if any grievance available under the law. With the aforesaid observationsl Certified copy as per rules. expressing any opinion on the merits of the present,ends of justice witl be served if a rjiake a detailed representation afresh raising ]no. 2 - Engineer-in-Chief along with a copy jn three weeks from today, and on such authority ofthe respondents shal! decide with law as early as possible .preferabiy ijeceipt/ production of the representatlon. It is rerfiains, the petitioner may avail the remedy. this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^^fia^ "4<