IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN : PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE: G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 1471 of 2007 (Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India being aggrieved by the action of the learned Senior Civil Judge at Karimnagar in not exercising the jurisdiction vested in him for registering the case and for not passing appropriate orders on the claim petition CF.No. 3370/2006 filed under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC as well as the stay petition filed under Order 21 Rule 59 CPC seeking the stay of sale of the schedule property till the adjudication of the claim petition which were filed on 26-7-2006 in EP.No. 36 of 2005 and proceedings with the E.P. for sale of the E.P. Schedule property ie., H.No. 8-6-190(Old) 13-1AA (New) situated at Rampur Locality of Karimnagar town and District is unjustified and contrary to the procedure contemplated under Civil Procedure Code) Between: Thada Anja Reddy, S/o. Raji Reddy. Petitioner AND 1. Navarathana Reddy, S/o. Papi Reddy, R/o. H.No. 2-10-983/1, Jyothinagar, Karimnagar. 2. T.Raji Reddy, S/o. Bal Reddy, R/o. H.No. 8-6-119, Rampur Locality of Karimnagar Town & District. Respondents The Petition coming on for admission upon perusing the petition and grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V.Ravi Kiran Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner. The Court made the following ORDER: “ This Civil Revision Petition is filed alleging that the Claim Petition filed by the revision petitioner under Order 21 Rule 58 of the Code of Civil Procedure on 24-7-2006, has not been numbered so far. It is stated that even before numbering the application, the matter is being adjourned from time to time by the Court below and, in the meanwhile, the E.P. Schedule Property is going to be sold on 16-4-2007, in spite of the fact that the revision petitioner filed an application under Order 21 Rule 59 of the Code of Civil Procedure for stay of the proceedings in the E.P. Registry is therefore directed to call for a report from the learned Senior Civil Judge, Karimnagar, as to why the E.A. filed by Thada Anja Reddy in E.P.No. 36 of 2005 has not been numbered. Report to be received by 9-4-2007. Post on 10-04-2007.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The Senior Civil Judge, Karimnagar. (By Speed Post) 2. Navarathana Reddy, S/o. Papi Reddy, R/o. H.No. 2-10-983/1, Jyothinagar, Karimnagar. 3. T.Raji Reddy, S/o. Bal Reddy, R/o. H.No. 8-6-119, Rampur Locality of Karimnagar Town & District. 4. One CC to Sri V.Ravi Kiran Rao, Advocate(OPUC) 5. One spare copy. SAH HIGH COURT RGJ DATED: 30-03-2007 NOTE: POST ON 10-04-2007 ORDER CRP.NO. 1471 OF 2007 DIRECTION DRAFTED BY: SAH APPROVED BY: DRAFTED ON: 04-04-2007 HIGH COURT RGJ DATED: 30-03-2007 NOTE: POST ON 10-04-2007 ORDER CRP.NO. 1471 OF 2007 DIRECTION