1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No. 6682/2010 Prahlad Bhati & anr Vs State of Rajasthan 21.7.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr RK Daga - for the petitioners Mr Laxman Meena, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that allegation does not exist against the petitioners for forming offence under section 326 IPC. Such allegation does exists against Ghanshyam. In view of aforesaid, petitioners may be granted benefit of anticipatory bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After taking into consideration rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, but looking to the facts of this case, I allow this bail application under section 2 438 CrPC. Therefore, the SHO/IO of the Police Station – Sadar, Alwar is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner/s Prahlad Bhati and Bhagwan Bhati in FIR No. 268/2010 registered for offence under Section/s 323, 341, 379/34 IPC, he shall enlarge them on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety each in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i)They shall make themselves available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii)They shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)They shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (iv)They shall not commit same and similar offence during the period of bail. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma