IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1837 of 2009 Kumari Sulekha Rani . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors . ----------- 4. 01.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner questions the selection and appointment of respondent no. 9 on the post of Anganwari Sewika. The petitioner has an adequate remedy before the District Magistrate concerned if she is aggrieved by the selection of respondent no. 9, in preference to her. In view of the alternative remedy available where all questions of facts sought to be raised presently can well also be considered and the benefit of original records shall also be available for perusal, there is no occasion for the writ Court to interfere. If the petitioner is so advised and files any such application before the District Magistrate within 30 days from today, let the same be considered and disposed by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of three month from the date of receipt and/or presentation of such application after hearing all concerned including respondent no. 9. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J. )