IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7803 OF 2008 M/s. H.J.Buhariwala & Associates ...Petitioners Vs. Cantonment Board Pune ...Respondents Shri P. S. Dani, Advocate for the Petitioners Shri K.J.Presawalla, Sr.Counsel i/b Mulla & Mulla & C.B.& Caroe for Respondents. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED : 26th February, 2009. P.C.: The Petitioners have challenged the impugned order/impugned communication, whereby their application to renew the Trade Licence is refused on the ground that the adjoining toilet/W.C. is in unhygienic condition. Admittedly, the Petitioners are running a canteen in the said premises since 1990 on yearly permission granted by the concerned authorities. The respondents are free to take action against the adjoining toilet/W.C.owner. However, so far as the Petition is concerned, on this ground, no reason not to renew the Petitioners' licence. The Petitioners should not be made to suffer for the action or inaction on the part of neighbour or Landlord. In view of this, the Petitioners are not pressing the so called allegation of collusion. The respondents to consider the Application in accordance with the law. The impugned communication is quashed. The Petition is allowed accordingly. No cost. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)