IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42419 of 2011 Papu Kumar @ Papu Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 14.12.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the brother of the husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 498A and 302/34 of the I.P.C. and 3/4 of the D. P. Act. Earlier petitioner’s anticipatory bail application was rejected by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 8498 of 2005 on 31.03.2005. Prayer has been renewed on the ground that the victim died due to chronic jaundice and Viscera report suggests no poisoning and considering the same husband has been granted bail. I see no reason for the learned court below not to give the same privilege to the petitioner if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of six weeks from today and try to dispose of the same if possible on the same day in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No. 206 of 2004 pending in the 2 court of the learned C.J.M., Saran at Chapra. Let the order be communicated through fax to the learned court below at the cost of petitioner. With the above observation, the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is disposed off. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)