IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-955 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: March 08, 2011 Amit Sharma …..Petitioner versus State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.A.S. Khinda, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Shilesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) This is a petition under section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in a case registered against the petitioner under sections 420,406,120-B IPC vide FIR No.126 dated 2.12.2010 at police station Amargarh, District Sangrur. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner has been in custody since 6.12.2010, case is triable by Magistrate and investigation of the case has already been completed. Learned State counsel has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that allegations against the petitioner are serious. He, however, does not dispute the fact that trial is already in progress. Crl.Misc.No.M-955 of 2011 - 1 - In view of the aforesaid contentions, period of incarceration of the petitioner and the fact that case is triable by Magistrate, no useful purpose would be served by detaining the petitioner in custody any longer. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Sangrur. Disposed of. March 08, 2011 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE