1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.81 OF 2009 Vishwanath s/o Maneji Ghorband .. Appellant Versus The Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., Consumer Protection, Rural/Urban Division, Nanded District Nanded and another .. Respondents Mrs.C.S.Deshmukh, Advocate for appellant Shri H.T.Joshi, Advocate for respondents CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE : 29rd July 2009 PER COURT : 1. Pursuant to the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court on 7.7.2009, the learned Counsel for the respondents states on instructions that the appellant has been terminated on 3.7.2009. A petition came to be filed before the learned Single Judge of this Court questioning the concurrent orders of the Courts below declining to grant ad-interim relief during the pendency of the complaint before the Labour Court at Jalna. The learned Single Judge dismissed the aforesaid petition on the ground that no case for interference in the concurrent findings of fact had been made out by the petitioner. The appellant, thus being aggrieved by the order of learned Single Judge has filed the present letters patent appeal. 2 2. Mrs.Deshmukh, learned Counsel for the appellant states on instructions that in the light of the fact that the services of the appellant have been terminated on 3.7.2009, the appellant may be permitted to withdraw this letters patent appeal. Consequently, this letters patent appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ( A.V.POTDAR, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) vvr/81.09lpa