IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2888 of 2006 BIJAY KUMAR GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5. 29.07.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. Learned Counsel for the petitioner fairly states that certain payments have been made in pursuance of the orders on the writ petition but contends that the quantum of payment made is not commensurate with the period for which the petitioner worked and therefore dues remains outstanding, details whereof have been stated in Para 3 of the supplementary affidavit filed today. This Court is satisfied that there was no positive direction for payment of any specified amount. The contempt application therefore cannot proceed. It is accordingly dismissed. If so advised, the petitioner may pursue the matter appropriately. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)