1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 5339/2007 (Ram Murti & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 16/11/2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. V.K.Bhadu, for the petitioners. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and police investigation diary. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that there is no allegation against the present petitioners having caused any injury to the injured. The allegation of causing gunshot injury by 12 bore pistol is against Dilip who is not before this Court. From the perusal of the order impugned as also the police investigation diary, it appears that it was Dilip who caused the gunshot injury to the injured. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, without commenting on the merit of the case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is 2 allowed and it is directed that petitioners Ram Murti S/o Sheokaran and Rohtash S/o Chimna Ram be released on bail in FIR No. 122/07 P.S. Bhirani, Bhadra, district Hanumangarh provided each of them executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP