''•^^^'^'^'''^y-f IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR \^A>' CONTEMPT EE^TTOT? No^ y /. Of 2010 CGt^^^ PETITIONE ^y ^ ^> ^- Tomeshwar Patel , aged about 50 years S/o Late Shri B.S.Patel, Terminated AsistantiTiacher , R/o Village Kirari, Tahsil Dfabhra, District Janjgir Champa (CG). I VERSUS Shri R.P.Mandal ,Secretory Department Of School Education DKS Bhawan Raipur (CG) CpNTEMPTPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 lOF THE ©ONSTITUTIONQF INDIA REAELWTTH SECTION 12 OE THE CONTEMPT QK COURT ACT. 5PONDENT CONTEMNOR -HC'-22 ^TI^T^T [<r<J5b ^^ ?t»^icn ^[^a Praveen ^^'^rrai^R, 'g^^R^. f^cni^y @ *<lNdl 9b*<icb i1T^?T "CR-^ (^.^...^.^.LC^2 ^I// ^•^T" 3?n^r'^TT^R ^ftn SB : Hpn^ble^Shri Manindra IMohan Shrivastaya, J. 19.01.2011 Mr. Kamal Kishore Pate| Ms. Tripti Dewangan, [, counsel for the petitioner. c^unsel for the respondent. thb Learned counsel for passed by this Court on| No.7014/08 has been compli^ Learned counsel for averments made in the compliance of the order pa^ been decided. He submits t caused in deciding the appea} mainly on account of various) the respondent authority has| submitting that there was this Court. Considering the the parties and upon perusiiji in the opinion of this Courtj willful disobedience of the Rule is therefore dischat: The petitioner is accord^ order cM<llt<yl<flT1 '^TTH^Jt ^ fec2t <f^1^1< '^^f^m'STT^T petitioner submits that the order 17.12.2008 passed in W.P. (S) ^d with, though, belatedly. [the respondent, referring to the cojunter affidavit, submitted that in }sed by this Court, the appeal has 1|hat though there was some delay 1, the same is not deliberate and was procedural requirements, for which 1 tendered his unconditional apology, n|o intention to disobey the order of submijssion made by learned counsel for ^g the reply filed by the respondent, it does not appear to be a case of passed by this Court. f-gecl. Ingly finally disposed off. ^lanindra Msob«nSbrivastava Judge [•q-r^ tf?^