1 wp4592-09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4592 OF 2009 1] Sow. Sunanda Sarjerao Kachkure .. PETITIONER Vs 1] The Administrator, City & Industrial Development Corporation Maharashtra Ltd. & Ors ...RESPONDENTS ... Shri Sunil P. Sonpawale, Adv.for petitioner. Shri A.S.Bajaj,Adv. for Respondents 1 to 3. Shri S.K.Kadam, AGP for R-4 State. ... CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & T.V.NALAWADE,JJ. DATE : 23/08/2011 ORAL ORDER : 1] We have heard learned counsel Shri Bajaj. Learned counsel submits that in identical situation, this Court had dealt with the issue in respect of plots situated in Sector N-2 [Survey No.70/3]. The counsel submits that petitioner no.2 would file application to the CIDCO authorities for getting regularization of transfer of plot from B.G.G. Associates to him and after getting approval, would seek No 2 wp4592-09 Objection certificate for raising construction over the subject plot. 2] Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that original owner of the land Mr.Salvi nominated B.G.G. Associates. By virtue of the said nomination, B.G.G. Associates entered into an agreement with petitioner no.2 and others. B.G.G. Associates had transferred plot in the name of petitioner no.2 on 25/12/1999. Petitioner submits that on 25/1/2000, CIDCO had passed an order sanctioning execution of sub- lease in favour of petitioner no.2 for getting the Deed registered in the Sub-Registrar office. The counsel further submits that petitioner no.2 applied for transferring the said plot in favour of petitioner no.1 on 17/7/2000 with CIDCO. Learned counsel Shri Bajaj submitted that though CIDCO authority had asked petitioner no.2 to deposit the requisite amount towards transfer of plot, the said amount could not be deposited by petitioner no.2 with the CIDCO, therefore, the transaction of further transfer from petitioner no.2 to petitioner no.1 could not materialize. We have perused order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.1438/07 and other Writ Petitions arising out of the subject land in Survey No.70/3. 3] Considering the material placed before us, we observe that petitioner no.2 is entitled to approach CIDCO authorities for consideration of his application for regularization of allotment in his favour and thereafter, for grant of No Objection certificate for raising 3 wp4592-09 construction over the subject plot. With these observations, Petition stands disposed of. [T.V.NALAWADE,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] umg/wp4592-09