( 1 ) Cri.Appln5255-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5255 OF 2010 Sayyad Sultan Sayyad Razak APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT .... Mr. N.N. Chitlange, advocate for the applicant. Mr. D.V. Tele, APP for the respondent/State. .... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 23rd December, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The application is for bail. 3. Having heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned A.P.P. and on perusal of the FIR and the relevant investigation papers, it appears that deceased Rizwana was assaulted by the applicant by means of a knife in the relevant evening at the house of her parents. She had been to house of her parents on 8th August, 2010 due to illness. The applicant alongwith his father and brother, etc. went to house of parents of deceased Rizwana. He noticed that the wife was engaged in cooking. While she was serving water to the applicant, all of a sudden, the applicant stabbed her by means of a knife on the abdomen. The wife of the applicant fell ( 2 ) Cri.Appln5255-10 down in injured condition and was found to have died before she was admitted in the hospital. 4. It prima facie appears that there is eye witness account available to infer complicity of the applicant. It further appears that he had gone to house of the inlaws with preparation to eliminate deceased Rizwana. He had been accompanied by his relatives. The applicant was annoyed as without his permission, deceased Rizwana had gone to house of her parents. The witnesses are inter-related and likely to be influenced if the applicant would be released on bail. In this view of the matter, the application is destitute of merit and therefore, is dismissed. The sessions trial shall be expedited and be completed as far as possible within period of eight (8) months. 5. The observations made in this order be not considered while considering the sessions trial. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/criapln5255-10 ( 3 ) Cri.Appln5255-10