IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5261 of 2006 1. Kumkum Devi wife of Ganesh Chandra Jha, resident of village- Barahat Bara Bazar, P.S. Barahat, District Banka, at present posted at Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalay, Vaishali at Hajipur 2. Ganesh Chandra Jha son of Late Surya Narayan Jha, resident of village- Barahat Bara Bazar, P.S. Barahat, District Banka Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Collector, Banka 3. The S.D.O., Banka 4. The S.P., Banka 5. The Deputy Collector (I/C), District Confidential Section, Collectorate, Banka 6. The Officer-in-charge, Barahat P.S., Banka 7. Rameshwar Jha son of Late Pandit Lalit Narayan Jha, resident of village- Mandar Kakariya, P.S. Barahat, District Banka 8. Subodh Yadav 9. Awadh Kishore Yadav 10. Kamal Kishore Yadav 11. Pradip Yadav, All sons of Late Sukhdeo Yadav, resident of village Radha Nagar, P.S. Barahat, District Banka 12. Md. Ansar son of Md. Maitul, resident of village Nemua, P.S. Barahat, Dist. Banka …. ……….. Respondents For the Petitioners :Mr. Rajib Ranjan Jha, Advocate For the State :Mr. D.K. Singh, A.C. to G.P.-5 02/ 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are not being granted the full benefit of order dated 9.12.2004, Annexure-4 passed by the Collector, Banka in C.J.A. No. 115 of 2000-01, as the validity of - 2 - the said order has been challenged by Respondent nos. 7 and 8 herein before the Subordinate Judge, Banka in Title Suit No. 12 of 2005 on the ground that the said order has been passed ignoring the sale deed dated 29.10.1999 and 26.12.2000 executed by Respondent no.7 in favour of Respondent no.8. 3. In my opinion, the relief prayed for in this writ petition has to await the disposal of the aforesaid Title Suit No. 12 of 2005 pending in the court of Subordinate Judge, Banka, plaint whereof is contained in Annexure-14 to the supplementary affidavit filed today. 4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are defendants in the aforesaid suit, petitioner no.2 has already appeared in the court below. The appearance of other defendants have been dispensed with by the court below. 5. Before parting with this order, this Court would like to direct the court below to expedite the hearing of Title Suit No. 12 of 2005 and to conclude the same as early as possible, in any case preferably within - 3 - one year from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order in the court below. 6. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)