1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 406/2011 (Ghanshyam K. Fulsunge VERSUS M/s Shewalkar Developers Ltd. & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.I. Dhatrak, counsel for the petitioner. Shri K.H. Dodani h/f Shri Shyam Dewani, counsel for the respondents. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : APRIL 19 , 2011 . Shri Dhatrak, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner would challenge the impugned order dated 24.12.2010 along with the judgments, which would be passed by the first appellate Court in Regular Civil Appeal Nos.515/1991 and 516/1991, in case the said judgments go against the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, states that the petitioner is desirous of withdrawing this petition with liberty to challenge the impugned order at a subsequent stage, in case a contingency arises. Shri Dodani, the learned counsel for the respondents, has no objection in regard to the aforesaid statements. Hence, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the impugned orders dated 24.12.2010 at a subsequent stage, in case a contingency so arises. 2 The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. No order as to costs. JUDGE APTE