IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 23555 of 2004 Between: V. Praveen Kumar, s/o Yellaiah, Aged about 25 years, Unemployee, R/o H.No. 5-8-124/81/1, Narayana Reddy Colony, Sangareddy, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Senior Manager, Bharat Dyanmic Limited, Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad. 2. The District Employment Officer, The District Employment Exchange, Medak District at Sangareddy. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for the selection process to be held on in the month of December, 2004 or any other subsequent date for the post of helper (Daily Wages) for ST category under backlog vacancies in the office of the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the law and consequently direct the respondents herein to consider the case of the petitioner for the selection process for the post of Helper ( Daily Wages) for S.T. Category under backlog vacancies to be held on in the month of December, or any subsequent date without insisting upon that the petitioner should be sponsored by the 2nd respondent and appoint the petitioner in the said post. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.BRAHMAM (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for Respondent No.1: MR.K.SRINIVASA MURTHY, SC FOR BDL. Counsel for Respondent No.2: GP FOR EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING The Court, at the stage of admission, made the following: ORDER: None appears for the petitioner. The writ petition is filed seeking a mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for selection process to be held in the month of December, 2004, or any other subsequent date, to the post of helper (daily wages) for ST category under backlog vacancies in the office of the first respondent, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law. The learned standing counsel for the first respondent contends that the selection process is over and, therefore, the question of considering the case of the petitioner to the post of helper does not arise. Hence, the cause in this writ petition does not survive requiring any adjudication. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ___________________ 02-03-2005. Lrkm. To 1. The Senior Manager, Bharat Dyanmic Limited, Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad. 2. The District Employment Officer, The District Employment Exchange, Medak District at Sangareddy. 3. 2 CCs to the Government Pleader for Employment & Training, High Court Buildings, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (O.U.T). 4. 2 CD copies. Form-NIC-OGS/WP{AVLR}