IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 6TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 15TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 16991 of 2006(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- MARY PAWLY G.L., AGED 42 YEARS, W/O. JAMES, JITHIN NIVAS, LOURDEPURAM, KANJIRAMKULAM VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.R.NANDAKUMAR SRI.B.RAJEEV KOYICKAL SRI.G.ANANTHANARAYANAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, FORT JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23. 2. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-4. 3. SRI. J. PRAVEEN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NEYYATTINKARA BRANCH, NEYYATTINKARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. *(4. SRI. K. KRISHNAKUMAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NEYYATTINKARA BRANCH, NEYYATTINKARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.) CORRECTED *R4: DILEEP KUMAR, J, THE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., EVENING BRANCH, NEYYATTINKARA, NEYYATTINKARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. CORRECTED VIDE ORDER DATED 19.6.2007 IN I.A.No.7901/2007 ADV. SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR FOR R1 SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS,SC,KPSC FOR R2 SRI.K.G.RADHAKRISHAN,SC,TVM.DIST.CO.OP. FOR R1 SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS, FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ---------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 16991 OF 2006 ----------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~~~~ This Writ petition has been filed mainly with the prayer to issue a writ of mandamus commanding the 1st respondent to report all existing vacancies of Peon/Watchman and those arising during the currency of Ext.P2 to the P.S.C. and in turn to direct the Kerala Public Service Commission to advise candidates including the petitioner against such vacancies. Ext.P3 is a list that was published on 1.7.2003. Admittedly, the said list had expired on 30.6.2006. The interim order dated 29.6.2006 would reveal that in connected matter interim orders were passed to report vacancies. In case there were vacancies reported pursuant to such interim orders on or before 30.6.2006, necessarily, the petitioner would also be entitled to get advised and appointed based on her ranking in Ext.P3 rank list. However, owing to efflux of time, no further reliefs could be granted in the Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) ps/8/09