FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3055 OF 2011 “Jyotsna Jalindar Patekar Vs. The Chief Executive Officer, ZP, Beed and others.” with WRIT PETITION NO. 3060 OF 2011 “Surekha d/o. Vithalrao Meghare Vs. The Chief Executive Officer, ZP, Beed and others.” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. Sachin S. Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar,Assistant Govt. Pleader for respondent No.1. Mr. A.A. Nimbalkar, Advocate holding for Mr. V.D. Salunke, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 20TH AUGUST, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the petitions, with liberty to take recourse to the alternate remedy available in law. 2] Writ petitions are disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. It is made clear that if there is any delay in taking recourse to the alternate remedy, the petitioner would be entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, for the period during which he was bonafide prosecuting these petitions. [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-