IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 22ND JUNE 2007 / 1ST ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 17917 of 2007(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ R.VIJAYA CHANDRAN NAIR, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI (LATE), RESIDING AT VIJAYA MANDIRAM, MANAKKARAMURI, SASTHAMKOTTA VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR SRI.R.JAYACHANDRAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, KUNNATHURA, SASTHAMCOTTA, KOLLAM. BY G.P. SHRI.I.V.PRAMOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================================= W.P.(C).No.17917 of 2007 ================================== Dated this the 22nd day of June, 2007 J U D G M E N T The petitioner seeks mutation of his properties as per the Transfer of Registry Rules. The petitioner has filed Ext.P4 representation before the 2nd respondent in this regard. He seeks a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the same expeditiously. The learned Government Pleader submits that he is not sure whether Ext.P4 has been received. 2. Having heard both sides, I direct the Tahsildar to consider Ext.P4 and pass appropriate orders thereon as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Even if Ext.P4 has not been received, the 2nd respondent shall treat the copy produced along with the writ petition as Ext.P4 as a fresh application and pass appropriate orders thereon. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition which shall include Ext.P4 also before the 2nd respondent for compliance, along with a certified copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE