: 1 : SD IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4008 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO.4008 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO.4008 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.3155 OF 2005 NO.3155 OF 2005 NO.3155 OF 2005 Maheshbhai Shivabhai Patel ...Plaintiff V/s. Navinon Ltd. ...Defendants Ms.L.B. Makhijani, Advocate, i/b. U.Q. Jabillani, for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATE DATE DATE : 11TH AUGUST, 2008. : 11TH AUGUST, 2008. : 11TH AUGUST, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Ms.Makhijani appears for the Plaintiff. 2. Despite service of the above Notice of Motion, the Defendants have not come to the Court. They have not even filed any reply to oppose the above Notice of Motion. 3. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff sought relief in terms of prayer clause (a). She said this relief is sought to protect the Defendant’s property from being sold. She stated that this property would then be : 2 : available for recovery of the amount from the Defendants. She also mentioned that in a similar Suit lodged by other party, this property has been protected by a similar order. I think prayer clause (a) should be granted. 4. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). [A.V. [A.V. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] NIRGUDE, J.] NIRGUDE, J.]