CWP No.168 of 2008. 03.03.2008 Present: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Adrash Vashisht, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr. Adrash Vashisht, learned Counsel appearing for respondent No.2 has made a very fair and categorical statement before this Court that the demolition which should have been done by the petitioner now would be done by the authorities concerned strictly in compliance with the notice dated 12th/13th July, 2001. The litigation with respect to the said notice had come to this Court and finally Writ Petition No.199 of 2001 filed by the petitioner was dismissed by this Court on 1st June, 2007. Though the petitioner should have carried out the demolition himself, however, since it has not been done, in the light of the fair statement made hereinabove, it would be open to the authorities concerned to carry out the demolition in accordance with the statement referred to hereinabove. With these observations and with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. CMP No.212 of 2008. In view of the disposal of the writ petition, this application is also disposed of. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. March 03, 2008. ( Surjit Singh ), J. (rc)