IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3668 OF 2011 Between : Gunjepalle Venkata Subba Reddy ... PETITIONER A N D Gunjepalle Maddilety Reddy and others. …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 3668 OF 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order, dated 29.08.2011 in I.A.No.203 of 2011 in O.S.No.31 of 2005 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Koilakuntla, whereunder and whereby, the application filed under Section 34 (2) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (for short, ‘the Act’) to permit respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein /defendants to mark document, dated 18.09.1991 on their behalf in O.S.No.31 of 2005, was allowed permitting them to pay stamp duty and penalty. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff contended that document, dated 18.09.1991 on which stamp duty and penalty now ordered to be paid was not signed by the petitioner; and that the document, dated 18.09.1991 is incomplete document and hence, he prays to set aside the impugned order. 3. Proof, Relevancy and admissibility of the document can be looked into at the time of trial. The petitioner can as well raise the objection with regard to relevancy and admissibility of the document at the time of trial. Admittedly, the document in question is an instrument within the meaning of Section 2(14) of the Act. Prima facie when the document falls under Section 2(14) of the Act, stamp duty and penalty have to be paid under Section 35 of the Registration Act, 1908. Unless and until stamp duty and penalty are paid, the contents of the document cannot be used for any other purpose. Therefore, the trial Court rightly received the document on payment of stamp duty and penalty. It does not mean that the document was admitted into evidence. Therefore, the impugned order does not suffer from any infirmities so as to call for the interference by this Court. The petitioner can as well raise objection with regard to admissibility and relevancy of the document during the course of trial. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed at the admission stage. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ K.C.BHANU. J SEPTEMBER 02, 2011. YVL