T ’E R BIAP w.P(S) No yg /200 . . 'c 1 hetta am Su, S/o. Mam S, ged 39 years, Forest Range Offlcer, Kondagaon, /o. Kondagaom District Bastar (C.G. VESUS R PETIION TER / : PE 1 Ste ‘Chhattisgarh — Secretary, Department of Forest DKS Bhawan, Raip, District ~— Tough: aipur (C.G. The Joint Seetary, Dartment ‘ orest, KS hawan, Raipur District e Raipur (C..) G 3] he Princial Chief conservator o‘ orest, Aanya Bhawan, Jail Road, Raipur CG) x’4] Consvator of Forest, nk, Circle Kanker, District Kank, (C) tThe Divisiol Forest ‘cer, Forest Division Sout — Kondagaon, Distr ~— Bast (C.G.) EON UDER ARTILE 2 F THE ITN F I IN HE HONBL HIGH COUT OF CHHATTISGARH AT LSUR Maar R ah ayar alm A R ) RESONDNTS / ] at ot hr , ur R ) cr ep oi F D B , / T p t F ar ( er Kaer er G na Olli h ict ar WRIT PTITI N C 26 () CONSTUTIO O NDIA WGH CGURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S§ NO. 31$] OF 201a Petitioner Maheftara Ram Sahu Versus $tate 9f Ch‘nattiggarh & Others. Resnondents r WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SE : Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihutri, J.) Present :- Shri Mano} Paranjpe, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents. ORfER (ORAL) (Passed on 4‘” day 6f October, 2610} 1‘ Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred the statutory appeal against the impugned order dated 22.5.2010, whereby the petitioner has been pieced under suspension. The appeal is pending consideration before the State Government since 28.5.2D‘lD. On 5.7.2010, the High Court stayed the impugned order dated 22.512610. 2. in View of the fact that the statutory appea! is pending consideration, the parailei proceedings by way of writ petition cannot be maintained. it is weli settied principle of iaw that if an aiternative efficacious remedy of statutory appeal is avaiiabie, in normal course, the High Court should refrain itseif from interfering with the matter. Thus, the petition is dismissed. However, since the order impugned was stayed, the same shalt continue titi the appeal is decided by the State Government. Shri Shridhar, learned counsei appearing for the respondents! State submits that the appeal shall be decided expeditiously as eariy as possible. 4. In View of the above, the writ petition dismissed. No order asto costs. , ., . M sw- Sau'sh K. Agnihmh' ashok