IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5390 of 2005 RAMESH KUMAR SINGH SON OF BALGOVIND PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARHAT, P.S.- IMAMGANJ, DISTRICT- GAYA. …..PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE COLLECTOR, GAYA. 3. SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SHERGHATI, DISTRICT-GAYA. 4. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, IMAMGANJ, DISTRICT- GAYA. 5. DISTRICT PLANNING OFFICER, GAYA. 6. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, N.R.E.P. IMAMGANJ, DISTRICT- GAYA. ……RESPONDENTS. For the petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Saxena, Adv. For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, Adv. ----------- 03. 26.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for directing the respondents to make final payment to the petitioner for the work done by him as executing agent for construction of HADHADBA NALA BANDH under N.R.E.P. Imamganj, Gaya under parliamentary constituency Development fund of Sri Upendra Nath Verma at an estimated cost of Rs. 3,99,000/- for which a work agreement was also executed. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the materials on record this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the Collector Gaya (respondent no. 9) by way of filing an application for the said relief. If such an application is filed by the petitioner before the said authority within 15 days from today along with a copy of this order, the said authority shall decide the same by a speaking 2 order in accordance with law within two months thereafter. If the said authority finds any amount admitted and payable, the said respondent shall pay the same to the petitioner in accordance with law immediately thereafter. However, if any amount is not found admitted and payable in the said order, the petitioner shall at liberty to challenge the same before the appropriate forum. Devendra/ ( S.N. Hussain, J.)