IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) 16588 of 2008. Decided on 23.03.2010. ___________________________________________________ Satish Kumar. …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the Petitioner: Mr. T.C. Sharma, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 & 2: Mr. R.K.Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy AG. For respondent No.3: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Adv. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner approached the Tribunal claiming work charge status on completion of 10 years of continuous service. On abolition of the Tribunal, the application has been transferred to this Court and is renumbered as writ petition. According to the petitioner, the matter is covered by the decision of the Apex Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, 1994 Supp (2) SCC 316 Petitioner may file representation before the second respondent within one month from today, producing also copy of the judgment referred to above, in which case appropriate action in accordance with law will be taken by the second respondent in the light also of the decision referred to above within another three months. Petition stands disposed of. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 23, 2010(s/sl) (Justice R.B. Misra) Judge