IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST NOVEMBER 2007 / 30TH KARTHIKA 1929 RP.No. 1085 of 2007(B) ---------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.24791/2007 Dated 05/10/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. ASST.ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD NEELESWAR, KASARGODE. 3. SPECIAL OFFICER (REVENUE), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, K.S.E.B. OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------ 1. SRI. KADINHIMOOLA VISNUMOORTHY DEVASWOM, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI.E.KRISHNAN, THAIKADIPURAM, NEELESWARAM VILLAGE,HOSDURG TALUK, KASARGODE DISTRICT, P.O. THAIKKADAPURAM-671 314. 2. KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION LTD., REP. BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.F.C. OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE MANAGER, K.F.C. BRANCH OFFICE, KASARGODE. BY ADV.SRI.K.SHRI HARI RAO – R1 SRI.V.B.UNNIRAJ – SC FOR KFC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ. ----------------------------------------- R.P. NO.1085/2007 IN W.P.(C) NO. 24791 OF 2007-B ----------------------------------------- Dated 21st November, 2007. ORDER Balakrishnan Nair, J. Heard the learned standing counsel for the K.S.E.B., who appeared for the review petitioners. According to the review petitioners, the interim order passed by this Court is contrary to the regulations and also against the decisions of this Court. The writ petition has been referred to the Division Bench by the learned single Judge, doubting the correctness of an earlier decision of this Court. We felt that the matter requires detailed examination. Pending final disposal, to safeguard the interest of both sides, we passed the interim order. We are of the view that the grounds taken by the K.S.E.B., are not sufficient for reviewing the interim order, in view of the well settled parameters concerning the exercise of the power of review. Rp 1085/2007 2 So, this Review Petition is dismissed. Post the writ petition for hearing after two weeks. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. Nm/