THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.26178 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner challenges the action of the respondent in proposing to seize the vehicle bearing No.AP 09 TV 390 in pursuance of notice dated 22.11.2008. The petitioner has obtained loan from the 1st respondent to purchase a truck. Accordingly, a truck was purchased and it was registered as AP 09 TV 390. However, the petitioner committed default in payment of certain instalments. In terms of the contract entered into between the petitioner and the respondent, the vehicle was seized. The petitioner contends that though he offered to pay the amount at several points of time, the amount was not received and the seizure is being effected highhandedly. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. The writ petition was admitted on 02.12.2009 and interim relief was granted subject to certain conditions. The vehicle was seized on the ground that the petitioner did not comply with the conditions. At a subsequent stage, this Court passed an interim order, when the petitioner alleged that the money offered by him was not received. It however emerges that the petitioner has not paid any money so far. Therefore, no indulgence can be shown to him much less any relief can be granted. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 18.12.2009 JSU THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.26178 of 2008 Date: 18.12.2009 JSU