(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1050 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 1050 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 1050 OF 2005 Biogenics (India) Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus Kamgar Utkarsha Sabha ...Respondent ..... Mr. S.K. Talsania with Godfrey D’silva, counsel for Petitioner Mr. P.M. Mokashi, counsel for Respondent. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 25TH APRIL, 2005 DATED: 25TH APRIL, 2005 DATED: 25TH APRIL, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. During the pendency of this petition, the parties have carried out negotiations for an amicable settlement regarding the amount of legal dues payable to each of the 11 workmen and the negotiations have fructified in a settlement. Consequently the consent terms signed by both the parties on 25.4.2005 are placed on record and they have been also signed by the respective counsel. These consent terms marked as "X" for identification, be treated as settlement terms between the parties. 2. The learned counsel for the parties, therefore, prayed that the petition would be disposed of in (-2-) terms of the consent terms. 3. The petition is, therefore, disposed of in terms of the consent terms and it is made clear that both the parties shall be bound by the said consent terms. The amount deposited with the registry of this court as shown in column No.3 of the consent terms, be disbursed/allowed to be withdrawn as per these consent terms. *****