1 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3390 OF 2007 Linlite Sales Corporation ...Plaintiff Vs. Gupta Textile Industries Pvt.Ltd. .... Defendant ---- Mr. Mahesh J. Devani, for the Plaintiff. ---- CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED: 31ST AUGUST 2009 P.C. 1. The suit is is filed to recover the price of the goods sold and delivered by the Plaintiff to the Defendant contained in and evidenced by eight invoices. From the endorsement the delivery challans it is established that the Defendant had received the Plaintiff’s goods. 2. There is nothing on record which indicates that the Defendants raised any protest as to the quality or the quantity thereof. The Defendant had not even replied to the Plaintiff’s Advocate’s notice demanding payment. A compilation of the documents is tendered. The same is taken on record and marked “A” (Colly). 3. There is nothing on record which militates against the Plaintiff’s claim in the suit. The Defendant is absent. 2 4. There is no defence to the Plaintiff’s claim in the suit. The interest has been claimed at 24% on the basis of a term in the invoices regarding interest. 5. The suit is decreed as prayed. However, the interest after the date of the suit shall be at 10% p.a. and only on the principal sum. Refund as per rules.