IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.28487 of 2009 Between: Mrs.Aruna Thammaneni. ..... Petitioner AND 1.The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Union of India, New Delhi and 10 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.Eranki Phani Kumar Counsel for Respondent Nos.1, 2, 3, 7, 8 and 11: --- Counsel for Respondent Nos.4, 5 and 6: AGP for Home. Counsel for Respondent Nos.9 and 11: Mr.B.Vijaysen Reddy This Court made the following: Order: The petitioner sought for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent No.5, in issuing Look Out Circulars/Radio Messages to the establishments in India against respondent Nos.8 to 10, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner sought for a consequential direction to respondent No.5 to issue such Look Out Circulars/Radio Messages against the said respondents. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.4, 5 and 6 placed before the Court, letter, dated 21-01-2010, sent by the Station House Officer, Kanigiri Police Station, Prakasam District, to the Government Pleader for Home, wherein it is stated that the Additional Director General of Police, CID, A.P., Hyderabad, informed that the Assistant Director, Creiminaire, New Delhi, has issued Look Out Circulars against accused No.4 i.e., respondent No.9. It is also stated therein that as per memo, dated 22-10- 2009, of the Additional Director of Police, CID, A.P., Hyderabad, Look Out Circulars were issued against accused Nos.1 and 5 i.e., respondent Nos.8 and 10 also and that it has come to the notice of the Police that respondent Nos.8 and 9 may visit India from USA and that the Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, Ongole, informed the Chief Immigration Officers of Air Ports, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bangalore, Mumbai and Delhi through Radio Message, dated 12-01-2010, that whenever respondent Nos.8 and 9 come to India by airways, the concerned authorities may apprehend them and inform the Prakasam Police. It is also stated that the Police are initiating steps to catch hold of respondent No.10. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home also filed memos of the office of the Additional Director General of Police, CID, A.P., Hyderabad, in support of the abovementioned letter. From the material referred to above, I am of the opinion that the Police have taken appropriate measures to apprehend respondent Nos.8 to 10 by issuing Look Out Circulars. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.37058 of 2009, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 3rd March, 2010 lur