Smwa $€Fmh v IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w w P (sy No 0‘23‘ 8L3) /2oo9 IONER Kahalram Janghel S/o Moti Ram Janghel, aged about 46 years, _ Occupation Revenue Inspector, LlLQUf’ V “ ‘ Padadah ‘ Revenue, Circle,’ rTahsil g" ' 4, ........... . Khalragarh District Rajnadgaon CG , , VERSUS RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Revenue ' Department, ' DKS Bhawan Raipur C.G. 2. r/The Collector Rajnadgaon, ./L District Rajnandgaon C.G. ‘ i _ 3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue). iKhairagarh’, ’ District RajnandgaOn C.G. DER -ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF .. INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN _ V L- i APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE, NATURE ‘ OF _‘ é.8 a; >. R 23:)“ ' 6g I . ' , DIRECTION MANDAMUS[CERTIORARI (ORDER IN THE _ _ _ ' LIKE > NATURE ETC. ETC. , _ t oi ' PETIT i : . .4 !GH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH : éILA ’ VWRIT PETITION (S) NO.2779 OF 2009 PETITIONER Baha'lram Janghe i Versus The State of Chhattisgarh & Others» (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constiiution of India) V Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri’Satish K. Agnihotri, J. iesentnh ShriRakesh Pandey,counseifor'ihe petiiioner ,, ResponDENTs Shn Y S Thakur Dy Advocate General with Shn P K Bhadun, Pane! Lawyer for ii‘e State ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 6 day of October 2009) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties the petition is heard l‘nally This Coun In Suryanath Kushwaha vs State of Chhattisgarh & Others , arising from the same impugned order dated 13-2-20G9 (Annexure — PI1) whereby the petitioner has also been sent on attachment for specific purpose of survey of Ahuthmand area the petition has been disposed of Shri Thakur teamed Dy Advocate General appearing with Shri ‘Bhaduri learned Panel Lawyer for the State submits that after completion of the specmed purpose the petitioner shall be posted on the same place of posting from where he is draVinng his satary. . ‘— tn view of foregoing, according, to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Under the aforesaid circumstances, there is no reason to takedifterent stand in this petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of on the ground that the/impugned order dated 13-2-2009 is simpty an adjustrnent for specihc purpose of survey of Abujhrnand area. The petitioner is drawing his salary from the original place of posting.- Sd/- 'Satlsh K Agnlhotrl ii} i“ ' Judge ‘ _ i ‘Gowri were) Nam? at 2009 (decided on 7-5—2009); H SPUR ' P