THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1965 of 2011 Dated 02nd February, 2011 Between: Smt.Mateti Nagarani …Petitioner And The District Collector, Adilabad, Adilabad District and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri S.Surender Reddy Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 5: AGP for Civil Supplies The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside order, dated 31.01.2011, of respondent No.3, whereby he has set aside the appointment of the petitioner on the ground that she is non-local. I have heard Sri S.Surender Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies. The petitioner was appointed as fair price shop dealer in respect of Srirampur Village. Respondent No.6 filed an appeal before respondent No.2, who directed respondent No.3 to hold a de novo enquiry on the nativity of the petitioner. Purporting to re-consider the case, respondent No.3 by his order, dated 31.01.2011, held that the petitioner is a non-local. At the hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed that against the impugned order, his client has a remedy of revision before respondent No.1. As the petitioner failed to assign any reasons for not availing the said remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition at this stage. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to file a revision petition before respondent No.1, within two weeks from today. To enable the petitioner to seek appropriate orders from respondent No.1, the impugned order of respondent No.3 is suspended for a period of one month. Subject to the above, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.2405 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 02nd February, 2011 Note: Issue CC in three days. (b/o) VGB