IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4254 of 2010 KUMAR AMIT RANJAN S/O SRI RAM RATAN SINGH R/O VILL.- SHAHPUR, P.S.- GHOSHI, DISTT.- JEHANABAD Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND TRAINING, MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS, BLOCK-12, KENDRIYA KARYALAYA PARISHAR, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI 2. THE UNDER SECRETARY STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND TRAINING, MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS, BLOCK-12, KENDRIYA KARYALAYA PARISHAR, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI 3. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION, CENTRAL REGION, 8 A-B, BELI ROAD, ALLAHABAD (U.P.) 4. THE CHAIRMAN OF THE SELECTION TEST, C.P.F./S.I. (DIRECT ENTRY)/1-CUM-COMMANDANT 29TH BATTALION, SSB, KHAPRAIL (WEST BENGAL) ----------- 03. 29.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Union of India. 2. Counsel for the Union of India States that petitioner could not secure the cut off mark for unreserved category and, thus, was not offered appointment letter. Petitioner is disputing the awarding of marks in Paper-I and has filed this writ application for a direction to the authorities of the Staff Selection Commission to re-evaluate the answer-sheet of Paper-I. 3. There is no rule which enable a candidate to seek re-evaluation of the answer-sheet. In the circumstances, this Court is unable to accede to the request of the petitioner and the writ petition is dismissed, however, it is observed that if any of the candidates appearing in the selection test conducted by the Commission is permitted re-evaluation of answer-sheet and such instance is brought to the notice of the authorities by the petitioner then the request of the petitioner for re-evaluation of answer-sheet shall be considered by the authorities of the Staff Selection Commission. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)