ARH AT BILASPUR HIGH COURT OF ciHHATTISG gle Bench: Hon' ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar, J Misc.AgQeal No.741 of 2002 NatiOnal Assurance Company Ltd., Branch Office Kamthi Line, Rajnandgaon through its Branch Office, Bilaspur (CG). Vs. 1. Dukli Bai, Wd/o. Late Moiji Ram, aged about 32 years. Sin QQeHant efendant No.3 Resgonden‘ Claimant No.1 Resgonden‘ Claimant No.2 Resgondent Claimant No.3 Resgondent Claimant No.4 Besgondent Ctaimant No.5. Resgonden‘ Iaimant No.6 2. Ramsheeia, D/o. Late Moiji Ram, aged about 12 years. 3. Savita Bai, D/o. Late Moiji Ram, aged about 10 years. 'Vasdeo, s/o. Late Moiji Ram, aged about 8 years. 5. ’Chandan, s/o. about 5 years. Prakaéh s/o. L about 3 years, Late Moiji Ram, aged ate Moiji Ram, aged Since respondents No. 2 to 6 are minors through naturai guardian mother Dukii Bai Wdlo. Late Moiji Ram. Ail r/o. Naya Dhaba P.S. Laibag, Tehsil and District Rajhandgaon (CG). Krishna Kumar, s/o. Narayan Soni, aged about 24 years, r/o. Bramhanpara, Gandhi Chowk, Rajnandgaon (CG). 9,...— Resgonden‘ Defendant No.1 —OWner. Gulam Farukh, s/o. Gulam Sarver, Defendant No.2 Thana, near Mas} aged about 30 years, id, Rajnandgaon r/o. Purana Resgondent (co). — Driver. (Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicie Act, 1988) Present: None Vfor the appellants. Smt. Savita Tiwari, counsel for the respondents. A D ORAL ORDER ‘ (Passed on 21—6-201 1) Raju None for the appeHant. 2) Even in the second call also, none appeared for the appellant and no representation was made on behalf of the appellant. 3) ln these circumstances, l am left with no other option but to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. i/r v Sd/— V‘ R.N. Chandrakar Judgex i rii