IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 62 OF 2008 SHRI. USMAN KHAN ... Appellant Versus MR. FIROZ KHAN AND 4 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Amrut Kansar,Advocate for the appellant. Mr. J. P. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the respondent Nos.1 To 5. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 5th December, 2008 P.C. 1. Mr. Mulgaonkar,learned Counsel for the respondents states that the construction in respect of the injunction sought, is complete. Mr. Kansar, learned Counsel for the appellant states that he is not in a position to state as to whether the construction is complete for want of instructions. I have no reason to disbelieve the statement made by Mr.Mulgaonkar, learned Counsel for the respondents. 2. Mr. Kansar states that The trial Court, while deciding the application for injunction, has recorded findings against the appellant on merits as if the suit is being disposed of. Needless to mention that the Trial Court shall decide the suit on its own merits uninfluenced by the findings given and observations made in the impugned order dated 12.05.2008. The appeal stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA