IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.953 of 2006 HEMLATA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 22.07.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the opposite party. This Cr. Revision has been filed against the order dated 7.8.2006 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court in Misc. Case No. 82 of 2005 thereby Court below has rejected the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 125 Cr.P.C.. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the order is quite sketchy. Neither any evidence has been discussed nor any finding has been given. Considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order. The submission of the petitioner appears to be quite correct. The Court below has not discussed the oral evidence adduced on behalf of both the parties. The impugned order is quite sketchy and non-speaking. In view of above, this application is allowed and the impugned order dated 7.8.2006 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court in Misc. Case No. 82 of 2005 is hereby set aside. The case is remanded back to the Court below for fresh decision in accordance with law on the basis of material available on the record. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)