IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 27660 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 20.10.2011 Naresh Kumar and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Chahal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Durgesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the complainant. …… RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that out of total plot of 220 sq. yard, the complainant is in possession of 72 sq. yard plot. A portion of 72 sq. yard is in possession of the petitioners. The dispute is regarding 76 sq. yard of plot. Civil litigation between the parties was already pending when the FIR in question was got registered by the complainant. Now the dispute between the parties has been settled in the sense that the possession of the disputed portion has been handed over to the Panchayat and the same shall be delivered to either of the parties in terms of the judgment of the civil court. The aforesaid facts are not disputed by learned counsels for the State as well as the complainant. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions made above, in my opinion, the petitioners are not required to be taken into custody for interrogation. The petitioners are directed to appear be- fore the Investigating Officer on 02.11.2011 at 10.00 a.m. to join investiga- tion and in case of arrest, they shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. They shall appear before the In- vestigating Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. They shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 20.10.2011 sharmila