FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO....... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 25 OF 2009 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO (ST) 1885 OF 2009 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Order Court’s Or Judge’s Orders ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Mr. Mohan Pillai i/b Madhavi M. Pillai for the Appellant S.M. Mirajkar for the Respondent CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & RAVI K. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 03.04.2009 P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Pillai, the learned counsel for the Applicant and Mr. Mirajkar, the learned counsel for the Respondent 2. The Applicant has filed Family Court Appeal (St) No. 1885 of 2009 but belatedly and hence, this application for condonation of delay. 3. As per the Office Note, the Appeal is beyond the time by 154 days whereas as per Mr. RMA 1 CAM188709030409.sxw Mirajkar, the Appeal is beyond the time of 183 days. 4. The Applicant states, on knowing the impugned decree of divorce, she had gone into depression and delay caused is not on account of any carelessness. She has satisfied that delay caused deserves to be condoned though it has been opposed by Mr. Mirajkar. However, this is a fit case to impose costs. Hence, delay condonation application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to payment of cost quantified as Rs. 500/ and to be remitted to the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority of this Court. 5. List the Appeal for admission on 21.04.2009. (RAVI K. DESHPANDE, J) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J) RMA 2 CAM188709030409.sxw (Leena Vs Kuttikattu) RMA 3 CAM188709030409.sxw RMA 4 CAM188709030409.sxw