1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:25.02.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION (PD)(MD) No.259 of 2011 and MISCELLANEOUS PETITION Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., through its Managing Director, Tiruchi. :Petitioner/Respondent -Vs- 1.Rajeswari 2.Kalaiselvi 3.Chandrakala 4.Santhosh Kumar :Respondents/Petitioner Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 20.12.2010 passed in Execution Petition No.89 of 2010 in M.C.O.P.No.1443 of 2009 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Fast Track Court No.I, Tiruchi. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gokul For Respondents : No appearance ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been directed against the order of attachment passed in respect of movable of the revision petitioner in Execution Petition No.89 of 2010 in M.C.O.P.No.1443 of 2009 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Fast Track Court No.I, Tiruchirappalli. 2.It is stated in the revision petition that the respondents herein as petitioners have filed M.C.O.P.No.1443 of 2009 on the file of the Court below praying to pass an executable award and accordingly an executable award has been passed and the same has been put into execution in Execution Petition No.89 of 2010, wherein an order of attachment of movable has been passed and in order to raise the same, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner has contended that the revision petitioner is ready to deposit the entire amount mentioned in Execution Petition No.89 of 2010 within a period of four weeks and therefore the attachment made in Execution Petition No.89 of 2010 is liable to be raised. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.Considering the representation made on the side of the revision petitioner, this Court is of the view to give four weeks time to the revision petitioner to deposit the entire amount mentioned in Execution Petition No.89 of 2010. Under the said circumstances, the present Civil Revision Petition deserves to be dismissed. 5.In fine, this Civil Revision Petition deserves dismissal and accordingly is dismissed without costs and the order of attachment passed in Execution Petition No.89 of 2010 in M.C.O.P.No.1443 of 2009 by the Court below is confirmed. However, the revision petitioner is directed to deposit the entire amount mentioned in Execution Petition No.89 of 2010 in M.C.O.P.No.1443 of 2009 within a period of four weeks and after making deposit, the Court below is directed to pass suitable order in Execution Petition No.89 of 2010. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar To: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/ Fast Track Court No.I, Tiruchirappalli. Smn RP/08.03.2011/2P/2C. C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.259 of 2011 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 25.02.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/