IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.7333 of 2011 ====================================================== Sudhir Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== 5 17-10-2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 323, 498A, 494 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner and opposite party no.2 are present. Opposite party no.2 is willing to resume the conjugal life in spite of the fact that the petitioner has performed second marriage. The petitioner is not ready for taking the opposite party no.2 to her matrimonial house and claims that he was married earlier when subsequently, opposite party no.2 was married with the petitioner under certain pressure. The marriage of petitioner and opposite party no.2 is not denied even by the petitioner whereas the claim of opposite party no.2 is that subsequent to the marriage with opposite party no.2, the petitioner has married to some other lady. The petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 1500/- per month to the opposite party no.2 from November, 2011 by depositing the same in the bank account of the opposite party no.2 by second week of every month. The opposite party no.2 accepts the offer of the petitioner and undertakes to supply her bank account number to the petitioner within a period of two weeks by filing the same on affidavit before the learned court below. The aforesaid payment will be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial or maintenance proceeding. Considering the aforesaid stand of the parties, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Shankarpur P.S. Case No. 27 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Three consecutive defaults in making payment by the petitioner will give liberty to the opposite party no.2 to file an application for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. Amrendra Kumar/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)