1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.819 OF 2010 Bhagvat S/o.Babasaheb Varat APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, RESPONDENT Mr.S.B.Ghayal, learned counsel for applicant. Mr.B.J.Sonwane, learned APP for respondent State. (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 09/03/2010 PER COURT : 1. By the present application, the applicant has approached this Court for his release on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with CR No.11/10, registered in Kaij Police Station of Dist. Beed, for the alleged offence punishable u/.s. 420, 465 of IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for applicant, and learned APP for State. Perused the papers of investigation till carried out. On 26/02/2010, interim protection was granted to the applicant during the pendancy of present application. 3. Perusal of papers of investigation shows that the said offence came to be registered on the complaint of one Arjun Shahaji Kale 2 that the present applicant is the President of District Boxing Association of Beed. The daughter of complainant was selected as Primary Teacher, as she was participated in boxing, by the District Selection Committee, Osmanabad, she is in need of sport certificate. Accordingly, the proposal was forwarded by the Selection Committee, Kaij to the Director of Employment Bombay, having office at Pune. At that time, the applicant contacted the complainant and demanded Rs.10,000/- with assurance that he will brought the affidavit of one Jayakwade, who is the President of Maharashtra Boxing Association alongwith form in Annexure 3-A. Advance of Rs.2,000/- was taken from the complainant and assured to take the balance amount after the work will be over. According to the complainant, within 7-8 days, applicant brought the affidavit and the annexure in Form 3-A, of which the copy was handed over to the complainant, which the complainant filed at the time of filing of the complaint. When inquired with the Office of Director of Sports at Pune, as to what happened about the file which is sent for inspection of Officer, Jayakwade, it revealed that the copy of the affidavit of Annexure 3-A was a forged document with a forged seal and signature. 4. Perusal of these documents shows that xerox copy of the affidavit of said Jayakwade with the seal and signature is found annexed alongwith the documents submitted alongwith the complaint. It further appears that this annexure is to be forwarded by the Boxing Aossciation. Considering these documents, those documents came in possession of the complainant only through the 3 President of Boxing Association, Beed. That President is the present applicant and if it is so, from this documentation, implication of applicant did not appear to be a false implication. No case made out to grant anticipatory bail. Application sans any merit, hence rejected. Earlier protection granted is vacated. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/MAR 2010/cri.appl.819-10