CRM-M No.23797 of 2011 (O&M) *** Mohan Singh Vs. State of Haryana and another Present: Mr. A.S. Sullar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, A.A.G., Haryana. Mr. S.K. Monga, Advocate for the respondent No.2. **** AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner as he has been summoned under Sections 302, 201 IPC on an application filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C. by the respondent No.2 in the learned Court of Sessions Judge, Sirsa. On 08.08.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel has argued that the petitioner has been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. after having been declared innocent by the police.” Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 has strenuously argued that the petitioner has been summoned after the deposition of the eye witness who has been fully cross-examined and has stuck to her guns. CRM-M No.23797 of 2011 (O&M) -2- That may be so but the fact remains that now the matter has been fixed for the appearance of the petitioner. Of course if the petitioner is found guilty he will be liable to undergo of whatever punishment imposed upon him. Learned Assistant Advocate General on instructions from ASI Jeet Ram has informed the Court that the second accused Sonu, brother of the petitioner, has since been arrested on 06.06.2011. In view of the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner made on 08.08.2011, this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioner should be granted the concession of anticipatory bail. Ordered accordingly. The petitioner is directed to appear before the learned trial Court tomorrow and submit his bail bonds. A copy of this order be given to the learned counsel for the petitioner under the signatures of the Court Secretary. ( AJAY TEWARI ) August 18, 2011 JUDGE ashish