IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 20724 of 2004 BETWEEN: P. Chandra Mouli, S/o P. Chinna Hanumanthu, R/o 16-11-16/G/4 (Plot No.80), Sripuram Colony, Malakpet, Hyderabad ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District 2 The Station House Officer, Saroornagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District 3 Smt. T. Leela, W/o Late P. Srinadh, R/o H.No.3-4-13, Opp. District Court, Sanga Reddy, Medak District 4 Mr. T. Manohar Gupta, R/o H.No.3-4-13, Opp.District Court, Sanga Reddy, Medak District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd respondent in not registering a case as per the directions of the Learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class (E & N) R.R. District Court made in S.R.No.5636/2004 against the respondents 3 and 4 and others and investigate into the matter as illegal, arbitrary amounting to dereliction of duty and consequently direct the 1st respondent to withdraw the said case from the file of the 2nd respondent and transfer the same to CCS, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District for registering a crime investigate into and for filing a charge sheet against respondents 3 and 4 and others and pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice as deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.SUBBA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents 3 & 4: MR. M. SURENDER RAO The Court made the following: ORDER: When the matter was taken up for hearing on 17.04.2008, as neither the petitioner appeared nor there was any representation on his behalf, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Today also when the matter is taken up for hearing neither the petitioner appears nor there is any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J April 24, 2008 DSK