1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA NO. 4730/04 IN FA St.NO.16686/2001 Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court s’ Orders or directions and Court’s or Judge’s Order Registrar s Orders.. ’ CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 22nd JUNE, 2009 --- P.C.:- 1) Heard learned Counsel. 2) The claimant seeks condonation of delay of 1950 days in causing to file the appeal challenging the order of inadequate enhancement dated 10.01.1996. The grounds disclosed are there was lack of communication between the counsel and the claimant; secondly, she could not follow the further course of action in the matter and the delay has been occasioned. The Counsel also urged to consider merits of the order under challenge as there was amputation to the victim. 3) At this stage of the matter, it would not be proper to keenly dissect the order under 2 challenge barring observing that it was in tune with the evidence that was adduced by the claimant Ashwini and on her behalf, as is referred by the learned Judge in the judgment under challenge at paragraph nos. 11 and 12 thereof. 4) The delay being exorbitant was required to explained. However, on the above two grounds, it is difficult to condone. Application dismissed. Consequently, the appeal is also dismissed. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/bdv/ca4730.04