Crl. Misc. No.M-16288 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-16288 of 2011 Date of Decision: July 18, 2011 Mohinder Singh and another …..Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.A.S. Gill, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arhsvinder Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) The allegation against the petitioners is that they alongwith others had stolen starters, switches, electric cable and fodder machine which stood already attached by the Court on January 8, 2010. The property in dispute stood attached on January 19, 2011 and the daughter of petitioner No.1 had taken the said articles on superdari on the said date. Crl. Misc. No.M-16288 of 2011 [2] It will be debatable during the trial whether the cognizance regarding the theft of a property to violate the order of the Court is permissible without there being sanction of the Court. There is admittedly an enmity between the complainant and petitioner No.1 as the complainant happens to be the friend of Amritpal Singh, the husband of daughter of petitioner No.1. The malafide and enmity appears to be a probable cause of the launching of the prosecution. The petition is allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioners they will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the conditions that the petitioners will join investigation as and when required by the police; they will not tamper with the evidence or hamper the investigation in any manner and that they will not leave India without the permission of the Court. In case it is found that the petitioners are indulging in tampering with the evidence, it will be open to the prosecution agency to seek the cancellation of the bail. July 18, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE