THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.27655 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner was appointed as Conductor, on contractual basis by the A.P.S.R.T.C. On 06.07.2009, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against her, alleging that she failed to issue a ticket to the passenger, while conducting a sub-urban service. After conducting domestic enquiry, the Depot Manager, Uppal, the 3rd respondent, removed the petitioner from service. On appeal, the Divisional Manager, Hyderabad, the 2nd respondent, granted the relief of reinstatement into service, as a fresh candidate. The petitioner contends that though there existed clinching evidence in her favour, in the spot inspection, as well as the domestic enquiry, she was not reinstated into service unconditionally. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Substantial relief was granted to the petitioner by the appellate Authority. If the petitioner feels that she is entitled to any further relief, she has to avail the remedy of review. Further remedy of approaching the Labour Court is also there. Under these circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the remedy of review. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.09.11.2010. GJ