MC 2316/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.MERUNO Heard Mr. P.K. Baruah, learned counsel appearing for the applica nt for condonation of delay of 177 days in filing petition for restoration of Tr . P(C) No. 29 of 2009. The reasons for the delay has been given in paragraph nos.3,4,5, 6,7, 9 and 10. Md Aslam learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits th at the petitioner has not satisfactorily explained the delay but in a very casua l manner, it has been explained in paragraph No.6 of the application. Considerin g the objection raised by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent and a lso considering the averments made in paragraph nos.3,4,5,6,7,9 and 10 in this application and also considering the fact that the matter regarding transfer of a petition from one court to other court relating to a dispute between husband and wife, I think condoning the delay would assist the parties for enabling th em to sort out the difference in matrimonial dispute. For the ends of justice, t he delay is hereby condoned. Accordingly, this misc. case stands disposed of.