1 S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 1212/2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 1212/2008 Megharam Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 20/04/2009 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. None present for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Joshi, P.P. By the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the order dated 2.5.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Bikaner (for short 'the revisional court' hereinafter) has been challenged by the petitioner. I have carefully gone through the material available on record. It appears that a complaint was filed by the petitioner in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.2, Bikaner (for short 'the trial court' hereinafter). The trial court returned the complaint to the petitioner to be presented to 2 S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 1212/2008 the Court having jurisdiction. From the averments made in the complaint, the trial court concluded that no cause of action arose to the complainant within the territorial jurisdiction of Bikaner and on the contrary from the averments made in the complaint, if any cause of action has arisen or any occurrence has taken place then it is at Ajmer and that order came to be challenged by the petitioner before the revisional court. The revisional court noticed that a forged Vakalatnama was filed before the Board of Revenue, Ajmer and if anything has happened then it is at Ajmer and not within the territorial jurisdiction of Bikaner. In my view, both the courts below rightly found the jurisdiction of Ajmer and not that of the Bikaner. I find no ground to interfere in the concurrent finding of facts recorded by the courts below. The criminal misc. petition is therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp