‘‘ WRIT PETITION No 5 7 OF 2005 9 ‘33 ’ Bhanu Pratap Da Age 43 years, /v‘ ?«§/ Sh Falgoda ( rahn [ nt Ceral Jal Baspu D1stc 1aspur (Chhatsgarh) x " j State of Chhattisgarh RESPONDENTQ Through—Secretary, Home Department, D.K.S Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur (C. G.) Suprintendent District Jal Ambikapur Dis&ict- Sarguja (C. G.) State of Madhya Pradesh Through: Secretazy, General Administration, State of MP, Sectariat Bhopa1.(MIP.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA: I 2 IN THE HIGH E/OURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR s D\MQ%M{QJIO n s " ff\ m P Saa] nt l 1Ir .. nt B1 u .. VERSUS i {a re f WRIT 3:5 N HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH;»BILASPUR I WRIT PETIfION INO.570 OF 2005 PETITIQNER Bhanu Pratap Das Versus RESPONDENTS (Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J.. Present :- Shri Ashok Vaishnav, Advocate for the petitioner. Si Satish Gupta, vernmentAdvocate for the State. hr Go State of Chhattisgarh & Others RAL) (Passed on this 2“ day or May, 201 1 ) Learned caunsel appearing for the petitioner suhmits that the main grievance of te petitioner, is to grant benefit of two increments, which has aiready been granted to the petitioner. The petitioner wants to continue the matter only for grant of interest and compensation, as the amount has been paid to the petitioner after a period of 15 years. In service matter, here s o question of grant of any compensation and interest, since the paymnt has already been made to the petitioner. Thus, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication at this stage. However, if the petitioner still continues to be aggrieved for non grant of some interest or compensation, he may take recourse to appropriate forum for relief, if so advised. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. ///.A Sdl— ‘ .Saiish K. Agnihom, Judge Arun ORDER (O “ h t i n e