WP 2310/10 1 SSK/7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2310 OF 2010 Dilip Dnyandeo Kadam & Ors. ....Petitioners Versus The District Collector & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. A. M. Kulkarni i/b. Mr. Nagesh Chavan, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. M. G. Bane, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 27th AUGUST, 2010. P.C.: Heard Mr.Kulkarni, learned Counsel for the Petitioners and Ms.Bane, learned AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. 2. The writ petition is filed challenging the interim order in proceedings bearing No. Rehabilitation/Obstruction/SR/58 of 2009 passed by Respondent No.3-Tahsidar on 16th February, 2010 under section 5 of the Mamlatdar’s Courts Act, 1906. The learned AGP further by filing an affidavit points out that the said proceedings have already been disposed of by Respondent No.3- Tahsildar by passing a final order on 15th March, 2010. The said order is annexed at page 99 of the affidavit in reply. In the WP 2310/10 2 SSK/7 above facts and circumstances, the interim order is merged in final order. The petition, is consequently, rendered infructuous and, is accordingly, disposed of. 3. Needless to mention that the Petitioners are at liberty to challenge the final order passed by Respondent No.3- Tahsildar on 15th March, 2010. In order to enable the Petitioners to challenge the said order, the parties shall maintain status-quo for a period of three weeks from today. It is made clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter and all the points and contentions are expressly kept open. (R. V. MORE, J.)