1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 1066 OF 1979 Kaushal Sampat .... Plaintiff Vs. Vishwanath Kochar & Ors. .... Defendents Mr. Mukul Tally i/b S. Mohammedbhai & Co. for Plaintiff. Mr. Dhawal Kedia i/b Law Charter, Mr. Ashwin Shete i/b Khaitan & Jaykar for defendant Nos. 1-A to 1-E. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATE DATE DATE : 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 : 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 : 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 P.C. 1) The defendants if so desire may file a formal application indicating the reasons for which they are opposing the admissibility of the particular documents. That application will be considered on its own merits. If the defendants fail to file the said application within two weeks from today, it is ordered that the Court Commissioner shall proceed to record further evidence ignoring the objections raised by the defendants in relation to the documents already pressed into service on behalf of the Plaintiff. 2) However, if the defendants take out the 2 formal application, further directions will be issued to the Court Commissioner as may be advised. 3) If no such directions are issued, the Court Commissioner shall proceed with further recording of the evidence so as to conclude the plaintiff’s evidence by 2nd November 2007 and submit a report. 4) Place this matter on 19th November 2007. ( A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.) A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.) A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)