THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA W.P.No. 9505 of 2011 O R D E R: The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 1.4.2011 passed by the 3rd respondent vide which the petitioner has been directed to vacate the land as mentioned in the notice, otherwise, the entire building and articles would be confiscated. Briefly the facts of the case are, that a notice was sent by the Tahsildar to the petitioner wherein the petitioner was informed that he has violated A.P. Assigned Lands Act, 1977 and has purchased an extent of Ac.0-89 cents in Sy.No.231 of Gopavaram village and Mandal and had constructed a factory. The petitioner sent his explanation through his Lawyer to the said notice. However, the explanation was not found to be satisfactory and accordingly Office Order Ref.No.A/98/07 dated 29.4.2007 was passed, according to which the land assigned was ordered to be resumed. The petitioner, vide Office Ref.No.A/98/07 dated 4.2.2011, was also intimated. However, the petitioner refused to endorse it. Thereafter, the petitioner was intimated by the Tahsildar in the presence of villagers and notice was also affixed at the door of his factory. Counsel for the petitioner submits that in a similar case i.e. W.P. No. 32050 of 2010, this Court had disposed of the writ petition with a direction that the respondents shall not interfere with the alleged possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the land in an extent of Ac.0-89 cents in Sy.No.231 of Gopavaram village and Mandal, without initiating the proceedings in accordance with law. A perusal of the aforementioned order as well as the perusal the notice dated 1.4.2011 shows that the respondents have initiated proceedings in accordance with law and only thereafter they have directed the petitioner to vacate the land. In view of the above, I find no merit in the writ petition. The same is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________ ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA J. DATE: 8-4-2011. MVB.