S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 665/2009 Ratanlal Purohit Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others Date of order : 16.02.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. Rajesh Shah for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner was placed under suspension in the year 1998 and the suspension order came to be revoked in the year 2003, but the benefits accruing between the year 1998 to 2003 have not been given to the petitioner. The petitioner made a representation Annex.4 dated 5.11.2008 and the same has not yet been decided. In my view, it would be more appropriate to direct the respondents to consider and decide Annex.4 legal notice treating it to be a representation by the petitioner within three months from the date of producing the certified copy of this order. With these directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp S.B.Civil Misc. Stay Petition No. 1307/09 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 665/2009 Ratanlal Purohit Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others Date of order : 16.02.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. Rajesh Shah for the petitioner. Since the writ petition itself has been disposed of, the stay petition also stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp