Writ Appeal No.636/2011 01.12.2011 Ms. Kasu Mahant, learned counsel for the appellant. Heard on the question of admission. By filing this intra court appeal under Section 2 (1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth to Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, the appellant has challenged the order dated 21.11.2011 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No.9076/2011. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and taking note of the fact that the learned Single Judge has disposed of the writ petition, giving time to the petitioner to submit reply to the notice dated 12.11.2011 and opportunity to the petitioner to file documents in respect of her title and sanctioned map and to establish that the construction raised by her is as per the sanctioned map and the corporation is directed to pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law, in our considered view, no case is made out to interfere into the said order. In the circumstances, we decline interference in the order passed by the learned Single Judge. However, we make it clear that if any adverse decision is taken by the competent authority of the respondents, the proposed demolition, if any, shall not be carried out for a period of two weeks from the date of such decision, enabling the appellant/writ petitioner to seek appropriate remedy against such adverse order. With the aforesaid clarification, the writ appeal stands 2 disposed of. The appellant to submit this copy before the respondents within three days. C. c. by tomorrow. (Shantanu Kemkar) (Prakash Shrivastava) Judge Judge rcp