IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21487 of 2011 1. Ram Binod Kumar @ Binod Kumar S/O SRI BRIJ NATH SHARMA, R/O MOHALLA-RAMPUR, P.S.BAHADUR, DISTRICT-PATNA. 2. MANOJ KUMAR S/O SRI SURENDRA KUMAR, R/O VILLAGE-KAKO, P.S. KAKO, DISTRICT-JEHANABAD. --PETITIONERS Versus The State Of Bihar --OPP.PARTY 2 22.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The two petitioners are named accused in this case with allegation of taking some amount from the informant on different pleas and the dispute relates to refund of the same. Police, after investigation, submitted not only final form but recommended action against the informant under Section 182 / 211 of the Indian Penal Code but taking a different view cognizance was taken. Further submission is that there was some partnership between the parties and they were performing some contractual work. Now, when some different arose the above case has been instituted without any material. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks of communication of the order, are directed to be 2 enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, in Govindganj (Malahi) P.S. Case no. 127 of 2009, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioners shall remain present before the court below on each and every date for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. AAhmad (Akhilesh Chandra, J. )