THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.9907 of 2009 Dated 22nd June, 2011 Between: Kadiala Kotaiah …Petitioner And The Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Industries & Commerce (SPIU & SAND) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Kuriti Bhaskara Rao Counsel for respondent No.1: AGP for Industries & Commerce Counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4: AGP for Mines & Geology The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in rejecting the petitioner revision vide the 1st respondent Memo No.1168/SPIU & SAND/2009-4, dated 20.04.2009, is arbitrary, bad and illegal, violation of principles of natural justice, violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and non application of mind, consequently quash the same by directing the 1st respondent to pass fresh orders based on the report of the 2nd respondent vide his letter No.93/Q/Sand/Vij/2009, dated 25.04.2009 by giving an opportunity to the petitioner.” At the hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the parties submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, interim order, dated 06.05.2009, shall stand vacated and W.P.M.P.No.12848 of 2009 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 22nd June, 2011 VGB