Criminal Misc. No. M- 27174 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M- 27174 of 2010 Date of decision:- 08.2.2011 Anil Kumar Tiwari and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Roopak Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Raghbir Chaudhary, Sr. DAG Punjab for respondent No.1-State. Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate for respondent No.2-complainant. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the FIR No. 17 dated 12.2.2010 under Section 381/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Sultanwind, Amritsar (Annexure P-1) on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2). Respondent No.2-Kanwaljit Singh appeared through counsel and filed his affidavit admitting the factum of compromise and stated that the matter has been compromised with the petitioners and now he is having no objection if the FIR in question with consequential proceedings arising therefrom, is quashed qua petitioners. As per compromise (Annexure P-2), both the parties have settled the dispute amicably. Counsel for the respondent No.2 does not dispute the genuineness of the compromise (Annexure P-2) annexed with the petition. In appropriate cases FIR can be quashed on the basis of Criminal Misc. No. M- 27174 of 2010 -2- compromise by exercising power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are not compoundable. It was so held by Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab, 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052. Hence, in view of affidavit of respondent No.2-Kanwaljit Singh and in the interest of harmonious relations between the parties, the present petition is accepted and FIR No. 17 dated 12.2.2010 under Section 381/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Sultanwind, Amritsar alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, is quashed qua petitioners. The petition is disposed of accordingly. February 08, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Vijay Asija JUDGE