vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.931 OF 2007 Satate Bank of India ....Plaintiff V/s. Satyawati Waman Gawthe ....Defendant Mr.Prakash Panjabi i/by Prakash Panjabi & Co., for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 11TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- 1. This is a usual bank suit to recover the loan granted by the plaintiff to the defendant. In respect of the said loan, the Defendant executed an arrangement letter, Personal Loan Agreement and the Revival Letter. There was no reply to the Plaintiff’s advocate notice demanding repayment of the loan. No appearance has been filed. The Defendants are absent. 2. A compilation of documents is tendered. The same is taken on record and marked ‘A’ colly. 3. There is nothing on record that militates against the Paintiff’s claim. 4. In the circumstances the suit is decreed as prayed. However, interest after the date of the suit shall be on the basis of simple interest and not compound interest. Refund as per rules.