IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT MONDAY, THE 18TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 29TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 18131 of 2006(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ ITHIKUTTY, W/O. BEERAN, AGED 61 YERS, PUTHUMANNIL HOUSE, KARAMOOLA, KUMARANELLUR P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.K.MOHANLAL RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUKKOM POLICE STATION. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CB CID, KOZHIKODE. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CIRME DETACHMENT, KOZHIKODE RURAL, VADAKARA. 5. THE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, NEW DELHI. 6. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR, SC FOR CBI GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.GIKKU JACOB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT, J. ---------------------- W.P.C.No.18131 of 2006 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of February 2008 J U D G M E N T The short grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that no proper investigation is being conducted into crime No.104/04 registered on her complaint alleging that three identifiable persons have committed the offences punishable under Sections 452 and 307 read with 34 I.P.C against her. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor now submits that the investigation is now complete and the final report has already been filed dated 17/3/2006. The final report has been filed after giving a copy to the petitioner herein. 3. In the light of the decision in Sakri Vasu v. State of U.P & Others [2008 AIR SCW 309], the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall raise objections before the learned Magistrate against accepting the final report. 4. I need only mention that it shall be open to the petitioner to raise all his objections against the final report W.P.C.No.18131/06 2 dated 17/3/2006. The learned Magistrate must consider such objections raised and pass appropriate orders. 5. With the above observations, this writ petition is dismissed. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge W.P.C.No.18131/06 3 R.BASANT, J. CRL.M.CNo. ORDER 21ST DAY OF MAY2007