IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1613 of 2010 1. KESHAW MISHRA S/O LATE VISHWA MOHAN MISSIR R/O NARAIPUR, P.S.- BAGAHA, DISTT.- WEST CHAMPARAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH COLLECTOR WEST CHAMPARAN 2. THE COLLECTOR WEST CHAMPARAN AT BETTIAH 3. THE DISTRICT LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER WEST CHAMPARAN AT BETTIAH ----------- 3/ 26/04/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The rival competing claims with regard to non- satisfaction of the decree/satisfaction of the decree, whether there has been part compliance of the decree necessitating further directions by the executing court are all matters to be examined and considered by the executing court first. On that shall depend the execution of the decree or the dismissal of the execution case as circumstances may be. At this stage, there is no occasion for this Court to usurp this enquiry from the executing court. This writ application is disposed with directions to conclude the execution case in accordance with law determining the rival competing claims of satisfaction/non- satisfaction/part satisfaction of the decree within a maximum period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, if not earlier. The writ application stands disposed in the aforesaid terms. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)