HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.113 OF 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is preferred by the plaintiff in O.S.No.150 of 2009 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Penukonda against the docket order dated 22.11.2010, wherein the petitioner-plaintiff was denied permission to mark the audit report during the cross-examination of the panchayat secretary. The Court below, by an elaborate order, has given cogent reasons for its refusal to accord permission to the petitioner- plaintiff to mark the document through the said witness in cross- examination. I see no reason to interfere with the order under revision in exercise of this Court’s jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Smt B.Tara Sujatha, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, would seek liberty to file an application before the Court below to summon the auditor who conducted the audit, resulting in the audit report in question being submitted. It is made clear that the order now passed by this Court, dismissing the revision petition, shall not be construed as precluding the petitioner from filing any such application. It is also made clear that, in case the petitioner files such an application, the Court below shall, after giving the respondents-defendants an opportunity of being heard, pass orders thereupon in accordance with law. Subject to the above observations, the Revision Petition is dismissed. RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J Date:29.07.2011 Usd