Civil Revision No. 1869 of 2009 (1) In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 1869 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 2.4.2009 Vidya Devi ..... Petitioner vs State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Jitender Dhanda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Rajesh Bindal J. Prayer in the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for setting aside order dated 15.12.2008 passed by the learned court below, whereby evidence of the petitioner was closed by order of the court. For the view I am taking in the present petition, I do not deem it appropriate to issue notice to the respondents, as the same would unnecessarily delay not only the disposal of the present petition but also the civil suit as well. The proceedings in the present case arise out of a suit for declaration filed by petitioner/plaintiff against the respondents/defendants. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present suit was filed on 12.11.2003. He submitted that the petitioner is a widow and she has to look after her family affairs. On the date when the the impugned order was passed, she could not come to the court due to unavoidable family circumstances and for that reason she could not lead her evidence. The amendment application filed by her is only for incorporating Vidya Devi widow of Shri Ram Kumar instead of Vidya Devi daughter of Shri Ram Kumar. He further submitted that in case one opportunity is granted, the petitioner will complete her entire evidence on the date already fixed by the court. The facts submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner are borne out from the record. The case is stated to be fixed before the learned court below on 24.4.2009 for evidence of the defendants. Civil Revision No. 1869 of 2009 (2) Considering the fact that the petitioner is a widow and she has to look after her family affairs, as a matter of indulgence, while setting aside the impugned order dated 15.12.2008, closing her evidence, the learned court below is directed to grant one opportunity to the petitioner for completing her evidence on the date already fixed by the court, subject to payment of Rs. 2,500/-as costs to the respondents. It is, however, made clear that no further opportunity shall be granted to the petitioner in case she fails to complete her entire evidence on the date fixed. The petitioner shall be at liberty to get summons issued for any official witness. The revision petition is disposed of in the manner indicated above. 2.4.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge