... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.330 OF 2006 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.97 OF 2006 Madhukar Krishan Madye & Ors. ...Applicants Vs. Tatu Sitaram Kandalkar ...Respondent Mr P.N. Karlekar for the Applicants. Mr A.G. Kundekar for the Respondent. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : APRIL 04, 2006. DATE : APRIL 04, 2006. DATE : APRIL 04, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Rule. The learned Advocate for the Respondent waives service. Taken up for hearing forthwith. 2. Second Appeal has been admitted for final hearing. There is a decree for possession against the Applicants. The execution of the said decree will have to be stayed till the final disposal of the Second Appeal. 3. Hence, I pass the following order: (i) Till the final disposal of the Second Appeal, the execution of the decree for possession against the Applicants will remain stayed subject to condition that the Applicants will maintain status-quo as of today in all respects in respect of the suit property. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE