IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 8654 of 2009(B) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. ANU NINAN, W/O.MR.NINAN C.GEORGE, CHIRATHILATTU HOUSE, 28/2986, WATER LAND ROAD, KADAVANTHRA P.O., KOCHI - 20. 2. K.T.MATHAI, KALLIKKATTU HOUSE, CHILAVANNOOR, KOCHI - 20. 3. C.J.ANTONY, CHIRAYATH HOUSE, 28/2986 (1), WATER LAND CROSS ROAD, KADAVANTHRA P.O., KOCHI - 20. 4. C.J.RAPHEL, CHIRAYATH HOUSE, 28/2986 (1), WATER LAND CROSS ROAD, KADAVANTHRA P.O., KOCHI - 20. 5. RAJESH RAJ, PAIS COTTAGE, 28/3652, WATER LAND ROAD, ELAMKULAM, KOCHI - 20. 6. NINAN C.GEORGE, 28/2986, ELAMKULAM, KOCHI - 20. BY ADV. SRI.P.J.MATHEW SRI.K.B.ARUNKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CORPORATION OF KOCHI, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE, KOCHI. 2. THE CHIEF TOWN PLANNER, CORPORATION OF KOCHI, CORPORATION OFFICE, KOCHI. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CORPORATION OF KOCHI, REGIONAL OFFICE, VYTTILA, KOCHI. WPC.8654/09 2 4. THOMAS, S/O.MANULLY JOSEPH, MANULLY HOUSE, CHILAVANNOOR, ELAMKULAM SOUTH, KOCHI.20. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI.C.M.SURESH BABU,SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.8654 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the first respondent Corporation to take and complete the drainage work, leveling, metaling and tarring of Water Land Cross Road in a time bound manner. The allegations are made as if the 4th respondent is a wrong doer. The 4th respondent has filed a detailed counter affidavit with exhibits. He essentially shows a case of an attempt to harass him. The petitioners have not placed any reply to the counter affidavit of the 4th respondent. The petitioners have essentially withdrawn from the case by making a submission today that the writ petition may be permitted to be withdrawn. No leave is to be granted to preserve any cause of action for the petitioners to further sue the 4th respondent. The writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.26/11.