... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.936 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.936 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.936 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.874 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.874 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.874 OF 2005 Khalid Mohd. Mubarakali Choudhary ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Shri A.H. Solkar for the Applicant. Shri A.S. Shitole, A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : SEPTEMBER 15, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 15, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 15, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate appearing for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The first prayer is for reduction of bail amount fixed by the order dated 15th December, 2005. The second prayer is for relaxing the condition regarding furnishing of two local sureties. 2. So far as second prayer is concerned, the same cannot be granted as said condition has been imposed for reasons set out in order dated 15th December, 2005 passed in Criminal Application No.6157 of 2005. So far as first prayer is concerned, it appears that the Applicant could not avail of the bail from 15th December, 2005. Hence, the bail amount deserves to be ... 2 ... reduced. 3. Hence, I pass the following order: (i) The bail amount of Rs.20,000/- fixed by the order dated 15th December, 2005 in Criminal Application No.6157 of 2005 is reduced to Rs.10,000/-. (ii) All the other conditions in order dated 15th December, 2005 including requirement of furnishing two local sureties are maintained. In view of the reduction of bail amount, the two local sureties will be in the like amount. (iii) Rest of the conditions are maintained. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE