IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14339 of 2010 1. GOPAL SAH, SON OF LATE INAR SAH, 2. GANESH SAH, SON OF GOPAL SAH, 3. IMARIT SAH @ IMRIT SAH, SON OF LATE BISHUN SAH. 4. DURGA SAH, SON OF LATE ANUP SAH. 5. MADAN SAH, SON OF DURGA SAH. 6. HEMANTI DEVI, WIFE OF GOPAL SAH, ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BHURKURWA, POLICE STATION- RAJPUR, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI. 7. RAM PRAVESH SAH, SON OF (NANDOSI), RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MADMABAD, POLICE STATION- MEHSI, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3. 03.06.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offences under Sections 304B, 201, 323/34 of the Penal code. They are named in the First Information Report. It is submitted on their behalf that having filed the case informant discovered the true state of affairs that his daughter, the deceased died on account of gland tuberculosis and petition to that effect has been filed by the informant in the court below which is on records of the court below. In the aforesaid background it is submitted that petitioner Nos. 3,4 and 5 are not related to the deceased or her in-laws and have been implicated as they are the co-villagers and had assisted the father-in-law and the husband in cremation of the deceased. Petitioner No. 7 is the husband of the sister of husband of the deceased and is resident of another village. Let the petitioners surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in the court below and in the event of their so surrendering, Petitioner Nos. 3 to 5 and 7, named above, be admitted to the - 2 - privilege of bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sikarahana at Motihari in connection with Rajepur P.S.Case No. 44 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. So far the case of Petitioner Nos. 1,2 and 6 is concerned the same be considered in the light of the petition filed by the informant that his daughter died on account of gland tuberculosis and if any evidence supporting such statement is produced then they be also admitted to the privilege of bail. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)