HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 566 OF 2011 ORDER : This Civil Revision Petition has been filed aggrieved by the order dated 8.4.2010 passed in I.A.No. 995 of 2010 in A.S.No. 42 of 2010 by the learned I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad. Respondent herein is the plaintiff in O.S.No. 265 of 2008. Suit was field for recovery of Rs. 3,40,000/- with future interest at 24% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of realization and for costs of the suit. That suit was decreed. Aggrieved by the same, respondent herein filed an appeal viz., A.S.No. 42 of 2010 along with an application viz., I.A.No. 995 of 2010, seeking interim suspension and the appellate Court passed the following order while issuing urgent notice: “Heard petitioner counsel. Issue urgent notice to the respondent. Meanwhile interim suspension of the Judgment and decree of the lower court subject to deposit of ½ of the decretal amount and suit costs. I.A stands posted to 20.4.2010.” Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Court below failed to consider that when the trial Court is not having jurisdiction it ought not to have directed the petitioner to deposit half of the decretal amount and suit costs. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the material made available on record. It is need less to mention that the appellate Court while issuing urgent notice granted suspension taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case. Therefore, the appellate Court exercised its discretion correctly and granted suspension imposing condition to deposit half of the decretal amount and suit costs. Hence, I see no reasons to interfere with the order passed by the appellate Court and the Civil Revision Petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, the appellate Court is directed to dispose of the appeal viz., A.S.No. 42 of 2010 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J DATE: 12.08.2011 KA