(1) (31) CRA 617/09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Amk CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 617 OF 2009 IN MISC. APPLICATION NO. 128 OF 2007 IN MISC. PETITION NO. 1377 OF 1996 Premsingh C. Khalsa .. Petitioner Vs. Smt. Amritkaur P. Khalsa .. Respondent CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. Date : 18 th JULY, 2011. P.C. 1. The Petitioner has impugned the order of the learned Family Court Judge at Bandra, Mumbai in the above Misc. Application refusing to grant sanction to prosecute the Respondent-wife for having committed perjury in the Magistrate’s Court. 2. The Respondent-wife inter alia filed criminal prosecution under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. The Petitioner and his family members have been acquitted upon considering the merits of the case. 3. The Respondent-wife has also filed an application for interim maintenance of Rs.5,000/- in the Family Court. She has been granted maintenance of Rs. 3,000/-. The case of the parties has been considered on merits. The fact that she was granted some interim maintenance shows that all her statements are not deliberately false. The fact that the Petitioner and his relatives have been acquitted would show that their case (2) (31) CRA 617/09 is made out. For every acquittal an application for perjury does not lie. The discretion used by the trial Court cannot be interfered with. 4. Civil Revision Application is rejected. (ROSHAN DALVI, J.)