-^ HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISSARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petitioh (S) No.3075 of2007 1. Chunnilal Maitri, S/o; Shri Prahlad Singh Maitri, aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher, Primary Sohool, Rumkera, Block Ghargoda, District Raigarh (C.G.) 2. Toran Singh Sidar, S/o. Shri Mein Singh Sidar, aged 42 years, Assistant Teaoher, Primary School, Tibhaudih, Block Ghargoda, District Raigharh (C.G.5 •" 3. Surajbhan Patel, S/o. Shri LekHram Patel, aged 44 years, Assistant Teaoher, Primary School, Kamtara, Block Ghargoda, District Raigharti (C.G.) \ 4. Bhagwat Singh Thakur, S/o. Sukhdev Singh Thakur Aged about 46 years, Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Teram, Block Ghargoda, District Raigharh (C.G.) Versus ^- ^ State of Chhattisgarh through the Seoretary, Sohool Eduoation Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) District Education Officer, Raigarh, DistrictRaigarh (C.G.) Petition U/A 22S ofthe Constitution of India Single Bench :Hon'b!eShri Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Present; Shri ManeeshSharma, oounsel for the petitioners. •Shri Vinay Pandey, Pane! lawyer for the State / respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 11" May, 2007) The question of law involved heFein is as to whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial.appointment or from the date ofcompletion of prebation period. 2- ^. w (2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as wel! as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the faots and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same as to that of inW.P.(S) No.5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and othsrs Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh & Others), which was altowed vide order dated 07.11.2006. (3). !n view of the above-stated submissions m'ade by iearned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in thesame terms. No order as to costs. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 5-^ 'li^'