1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 47. CA/6235/2006 In FAST/12119/2006 WITH CA/6236/2006 In FAST/12119/2006 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.G.Sangle, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. D.R.Jaybhar, Adv., for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Mr. V.D.Rakh, AGP for repsondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:9-2-2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr. S.G.Sangle and Mr.D.R.Jaybhar, Counsel for respective parties. There is delay of 549 days in filing the appeal. The acquiring body was party respondent in the Land Reference before the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Beed, however, acquiring body could not take steps in time to challenge the order. The reasons assigned in the application demonstrate, it is not deliberate or to avoid any 2 liability arising out of the consequences from the award. The delay being sufficiently explained, condoned. Delay condonation application allowed. 2. Upon the appellant acquiring body depositing entire amount covered under the award before the executing /Reference Court within a period of eight weeks, the order under challenge is stayed. Application for stay allowed in above terms. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/6235-06ca