IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.251/2006 State of Rajasthan & Others ...defendant-appellants Versus M/s B.M. Porwal & Company ...plaintiff-respondent Date of Order ::: 16.11.2006 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Deen Dayal Sharma, Addl. G.A., for defendant- appellants #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the defendant- appellants. The plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for permanent injunction, which was dismissed by the lower court. However, on an appeal filed by the plaintiff, the first appellate court, while disposing of the appeal, directed to refund the amount of Rs.28,000/- to the plaintiff-respondent. I have heard the learned counsel for the defendant-appellants and after considering his submissions in the light of the finding of the first appellate court I find that no substantial question of law is involved in this second appeal, so as to interfere in this second appeal under Section 100 of the C.P.C. Consequently, the second appeal is dismissed in limine. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//