IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 10824 of 2008 Between: 1 Peethala Appanna S/o. Late Sanyasi R/o. Peethalavani Palem, Visakhapatnam. 2 Peethala Pydithalli S/o. Late Sanyasi R/o. Peethalavani Palem, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Station House Officer, III Town Law and Order Police Station, Visakhapatnam. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents in not providing necessary police aid / protection in implementation of the temporary injunction order granted by this Hon'ble Court in CMP No.14252 of 2003 in S.A.673/2003 dated 08.07.2003 inspite of oral requests dated 03.05.2008 and written representation dated 07.05.2008 as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and violative of artice 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents to provide necessary police aid/protection in favour of petitioners. Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.N.(P).ANJANA DEVI, SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.10824 of 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication, as an application has been moved in the second appeal pending before this Court. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J 25.11.2008 v v