IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 9998 of 2006 Between: M.L.Narayana Rao, s/o M.Ramakrishna, Andhra Mahila Sabha, Durgabai Deshmukh Hospital & Research Centre, r/o 16-11-310/8, Flat No.102, Saralaramam Apartments, Saleem Nagar Colony-2, Malakpet, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep., by its Principal Secretary, Medical & Health Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Secretary, Andhra Mahila Sabha Trust Board, a Society, Registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860/Tamilnadu Societies Registration Act, 1975, OU Road, Having its head office at Mahila Sabha Buildings, Vidyanagar, Hyderabad-500 013. 3 The President/Vice President, Andhra Mahila Sabha Trust Board/Executive Committee, AMS Society, Osmania University, Andhra Mahila Sabha Buildings, Vidyanagar, Hyderabad-500 013. 4 The President, The Andhra Mahila Sabha Trust Board, having its Regd.Office at no.2, Raja Annamalaipuram, Dr.Durgabai Deshmukh Road, Chennai-600 028 TN. ..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR B.SRINIVAS FOR MR.K.R.PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondents: --- The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in terminating the services of the petitioner by issuing a letter dated 29.4.2006 saying that his services are not extended further without any prior notice and without assigning any reasons, much less contrary to the orders passed on 15.3.2005 as illegal, unjust, arbitrary in violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India apart from violative of principles of natural justice and also being without jurisdiction and consequentially set aside the orders dated 29.4.2006 Circular No.96, dt.1.5.2006 and Resolution dt.24.4.2006 issued by the Andhra Mahila Sabha, Hyderabad.” At the hearing, Sri B.Srinivas, learned counsel representing Sri K.R.Prabhakar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP No.12618 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 30th April, 2009 vrn