jJ£ 1.0 .04.2002 -fN +HE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM ~`C ORDER SHEET Writ Petition (C) NO. 8 Of rd¢ 2002 .,...Ri]Cs.hal..Blmtia...................Petitioner/Appe]]ant Versus State Of Sikkim 6! Another Ordci. with Signature Respondent Present Mr. 8. Sharma, Advocate appearing on behalf of Mr. D. R. Thapa, Advocate for the petitioner. M. N. a. Khatiwada, Addl. Advocate General with M. Karma-Thinlay, A§stt. Govt.Advo cate for the respondents. By an agreement made between the petitioner and the respondents on 03.07.2001, the petitioner was granted contract of collection of parking fees with effect from 03.07.2001 to 31.03.2002. That contract was cancelled vide Radiogram Ext.P-4. Full date is not given on the Radiograng but there `is no dispute that the Radiogram was given on 12.07.2001. The petitioner has claimed a writ for a direction to set aside the/ cancellation order and also for compensation. A prayer has also been prayed for extension of the period of coptract. The writ petition was filed on 30.03.2002 when the term of contract had almost expired. Though, as admitted by the Learned Additiohal Advocate General, the Radiogram is not properly drafted, yet no relief with respect to the rurming of the contract can be granted to the petitioner as the period of the contract has already expired. q` '., .,. I - _i ..-+ Office Note as to action (if any) taken on Order i ` i -----_--, Serial No. of Order` Order with Signature. ~ .' , I The petition is, accordingly, dismissed-in limine. However, it is made clear that this order will not be a bar to the petitioner to Claim relief 'for damages in appropriate proceedings. v.Grar` ( R. Dayal ) ChiofJustice 02.04.2002 Ogcc,:.¥O,:::# taken on Order r-