1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 27/2011 ( Amol Motiram Jangalekar .vs. State of Maharashtra through PSO PS Samudrapur, Distt. Wardha. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. P.P. Kotwal, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. A.S. Sonare, APP for Respondent. .......... CORAM : P.D. KODE, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 09, 2011 Heard. For the detailed reasons recorded in the order dated 27.1.2011, an ad-interim direction in terms of Section 438 of Cr.P.C. was passed in favour of the applicant. While giving the said direction, certain conditions were imposed upon the applicant in order to see that grant of direction does not hamper the progress of the investigation of the said crime which is said to have occurred on 11.5.2010. After considering the matters stated in the reply filed by the prosecution and taking into consideration that the complicity of the applicant is based upon the material in the shape of the statement of two witnesses which were recorded after a period of six months after the date of commission of 2 offence and the say filed by the prosecution not disclosing the applicant having not abided the conditions imposed while passing the ad-interim direction and having due regard to the character of the prosecution material and no case being made out for presence of the applicant required for custodial interrogation, the direction given deserves to be confirmed. Hence the ad-interim direction given is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions except now the applicant attending the Police Station on every Monday in between 11 and 2 p.m. until filing of the charge sheet. Rest of the conditions stand unmodified. The application stands disposed of. JUDGE halwai