IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41668 of 2010 JHOTIL YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.11.10. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 08.07.2010 in a case registered under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that 26 persons entered into the house of the informant and taken away the clothes, jewellery and other articles. It is further submitted that earlier the grand-father lodged case against the informant’s side and as retaliatory measure the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. The statement has been made in paragraph no. 17 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner was outside the State hence he could not surrender earlier. It is also submitted that other similarly situated accused one Shankar Yadav has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 5661 of 2004. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten 2 Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Thakaraha P. S. Case No. 65 of 1997. The learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner fails to appear on two consecutive dates during trial. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)