SlNGLEBENCn c, y'\QQ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. <^"^€.\ I 2005 Petitioner £^ '^'.^^^. ^^•-"'^N^ >-;,^x ^y "y Respondents !P Ram Vinod Singh S/o Shri Brij Nandan Singh, Aged about 35 years, R/o vmage Katkona, Tehsil - Baikuntpur, Dist: Korea-(C.G.) Versus ^ State of Chhattisgarh Through —The Secretary Department of Panchayat and Social Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) The Collector, Baikuntpur, Dist: Korea-(C.G.) The S.D.O (Revenue), Baikuntpur, Dist: Korea-(C.G.) The Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Kafkona, Tehsil - Baikuntpur, Dist: Korea-(C.G.) ^. ! „ ., • ; RIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 / 227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -"4. XI-HC-22 sn^t^iT R-ti* sn^i ?h^f •yfii;T .^>- illt.Sil^^ ''ff^c V .i~. .^ s-' ;~ x ca ^ 00 -y 'svf'^wvW, ^ahns, [«I<II'MI< Wlp srs^^ *<iti«'irai^qrai 'WI. 200.V ^^8T' 311^1 TOITW ^f?3 18-11-2005: bettttaner. Shri Anm Shulila, counsel for <he Shri Akhfl A®'awal,Panel Lawyer|fiw tfii The, peti&aer was to'nunated r^xaident No. 4. by oider dated 12.10.20W (Amiexure P-: passed by respondent No. 4. The petitionCT has fited dus wluch had already been quashed in In view af the for^Ewig, fl>we is petiB|an order had already been quashed, lfae| petitioncr is at Bberty to ffle a fi^di diereafter, wMch is not uadec ch^eige N cm^i^^'i Tw^\ ^ 'fecst <raf^i< i? srfigii ai^i |fiw tfie State/raspondMte. |ty oider dited 20.2.2004 pawcd by .3, tttappesii t) tias set dBide tfte order <tMed 20.2.2004 inqiugnit^ Ae order dalsd 20.2.2004 a.3. ^pea? by Respwident No. |no merit in fliia pediion as the uaffttff^ petitioni fe disnussed. HOWCVCT, flie ^etitfam, tf wy order has been passed I tliis petitioa befia®flris Court. Sd/- Satisb K. Agnihotn Judge [T^ ^Ha^