[1] DBCWP(PAROLE) NO. 6138/2010 ARVIND KUMAR Vs. STATE & ORS. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION(PAROLE) NO.6138/2010 ARVIND KUMAR @ NEMI CHAND Vs. STATE & ORS. DATE OF ORDER :: 25.08.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE MRS. MEENA V. GOMBER Mr. Rohan Jain, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Yadav, Govt. Counsel for the respondents. **** Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Convict-petitioner has preferred this writ petition for grant of first parole of 20 days. The respondents have filed their reply to writ petition along with nominal role (Annexure-R/1) of petitioner, wherein conduct of petitioner during jail custody has been mentioned as unsatisfactory. The petitioner has also earned jail punishment on 20.10.2009. From reply, it also reveals that petitioner has committed five more offences as per details furnished in para(C) of reply. From reply to writ petition, it is clear that not only the conduct of petitioner in jail custody is unsatisfactory but he appears to be a habitual offender. He committed double murder when he was on bail, [2] DBCWP(PAROLE) NO. 6138/2010 ARVIND KUMAR Vs. STATE & ORS. in addition to other offences, as mentioned in reply. In these circumstances, we are not satisfied that petitioner is entitled for first parole of 20 days. The order passed by the Parole Committee rejecting the application of petitioner for grant of first parole is fully justified and needs no interference by this Court. Consequently, we do not find any merit in this writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. (MEENA V. GOMBER),J. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. /KKC/