IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1222 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 1222 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 1222 OF 2004 Sou.Mamta Suryabali Singh ...Petitioner versus Shanti Prasar Mandal & ors. ..... Respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada ) Court‘s or Judge‘s Orders or directions and ) Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ) ---------------------------------------------------------------- M. Parabwith P.R.Arjunwadkar for petitioner M.Subramaniam for Respdt. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & D.B. D.B. D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. BHOSALE, JJ. BHOSALE, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 19TH SEPT., 2005 19TH SEPT., 2005 19TH SEPT., 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By this petition, the petitioner has claimed a direction for the petitioner being appointed on compassionate ground. Notice why the petition should not be admitted was issued and in reply categorical statement has been made that the petitioner is entitled the Profident Fund to the extent of Rs. 1.78 lakhs and is also entitled monthly pention of Rs. 1700/-. In this view of the matter, there is no question of issuing any direction for appointment on compassionate ground. Hence petition is rejected. *****