1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4165 OF 2002 with CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6267 OF 2002 Shri. Dattatraya Tukaram Girme Deceased through legal representatives and others ....Petitioners. Versus Vasant Laxman Kulkarni ....Respondent. Shri.P.R. Patil , Advocate for the petitioners. Shri. C.V. Korhalkar, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR, J. DATE : 7TH JULY, 2009 PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The petitioners are seeking indulgence in the concurrent orders rendered by M.R.T. and Sub-Divisional Officer, Sangamner regarding enhancement of rent of the land. The questions raised in the petition are disputed questions of fact. Whether the lands have lost the potential to produce the agricultural income and therefore, the enhancement of rental is improper, would depend upon various factors. The writ 2 jurisdiction cannot be normally invoked in such a matter. The petitioners could submit that crops could not be taken because drip irrigation scheme has been closed down. The M.R.T. and the Sub- Divisional Officer held that the sugarcane crops were being cultivated and therefore, good deal of income was being generated by the petitioners. The petition is untenable in view of involvement of several disputed questions of fact. Consequently, the same is dismissed. 3. In view of dismissal of the writ petition, the civil application No. 6267/2002 does not survive and disposed of. [ V.R.KINGAONKAR, J. ] ssc/wp4152.02