RE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OI $INGLE BEN“ F CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR '2009 é M Gurucharan Jai‘swal, S/o. Bhakulal §bout.é1gyears, Peon, w/ Jaiswal, aged a Secondary Government Higher Raigarh, District Education Officer, District Raigarh (C.G.) ( WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. l 31h”? A “ '$i;\°‘? : s» \ wDiO...‘ ‘ \Q aw '5 VERsus RespoNDEN-rs /:1. The State of chhattisgarh, Through : ’ The Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / 2. The Director,. Public Instruction Department, Raipur (C.G.) /3. The Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ,W, ..(S..%. Emmi-1h- $3: HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER‘ 18.8.2009 Shri U‘N.S.Deo, GA. for the petition as according to He submit§ that the petitioner; gnevances. r Counsel for the State su a position to make any staten petitioner is covered by the identical writ petition. He ho ever submits that let the petition make a representation to the r spondent No. 1 85 4 which would be decided strictly, in accordance Accordingly, the petition eventuality of filing any such representation by the petitioner the same would be decided expeditiously, in accordance Wi' It is made clear that lihis Court has not expressed any and the authority concerned is at is order, strictly in accordance with I .Sd/— v’ Pritinker Diwaker Judge Shri Ramakant Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. the State. At the outset, counsel- far the petitioner wants to Withdraw .him, his case is covered by the ’ jlid‘‘gment dated 19*11 April 200'7 passed in W.P.(S) No. 2415/2007. wishes to file representation to the . respondent No. 1 $5 4 apprising the authorities about his bmits that at this stage he is not in lent as to whether the case of the der passed in the aforementioned is dismissed as Withdraw with the liberty as aforesaid. In the ith layv. h law. opinion on merits of the case liberty to examine and then pa: law. WWW V