THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.321 of 2004 ORDER: The petitioner is an Association, A.P. Regional Rural Employees Association. It has been pursuing cause of its members context of brining about parity of emoluments and other service cond between the employees of Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) on the one and the Nationalized Banks on the other. It is stated that due to the e made by it, substantial progress has been made and pay scales are a equated. Its grievance is that though the National Tribunal and various agencies have recommended for extending the pensionary benefits t employees of the RRBs on par with the Nationalized Banks, the matte not reached finality as yet. It seeks a writ of Mandamus in the fo declaration that the inaction on the part of the first respondent in ens that the pensionary benefits are extended to the employees of RRBs o with the employees of Nationalized Banks as illegal, arbitrary discriminatory, and seeks consequential directions. On behalf of the respondents, a detailed counter affidavit is Objection is raised as to the very maintainability of the writ petition. Heard Sri P.B.Vijaya Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner the learned counsel for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is that the first respondent is not t adequate steps vis-à-vis the other respondents to ensure that there is as to the service conditions of the employees of RRBs and the Nationa Banks, particularly in payment of pensionary benefits. It hardly need mention that it is purely in the realm of policy making, be it on the part first respondent or the other respondents, whether or not to exten benefit of pension to a particular category of employees. It is only wh State or its instrumentality fails to act, where it is under the legal obligat act, this Court can compel to take a decision or to act in accordance law. The learned counsel for the petitioner is not able to place provision of law before this Court which requires the respondents her act in a particular manner. Therefore, the writ of Mandamus cann issued as prayed for. The petitioner has to work out its remedies elsew The writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to cost ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDD Date:23.09.2010 VGB