IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1907 of 2008 KRISHNA CHANDRA JHA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 02 02.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is stated to have been appointed as a daily wager brought into the Work Charge Establishment on 21.3.1988. He has been reverted to his status of daily wager nearly 26 years later on 26.11.2007 which is questioned presently. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon a decision of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 14474 of 2009 deciding a similar issue. The writ application is disposed off with the direction to the respondents to examine the grievance of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid order of this Court and if satisfied that the petitioner is covered by the same, accord him similar treatment. If the respondents propose to hold that the petitioner is not similarly situated and is not entitled to be accorded similar treatment, they are required to set out the grounds on which they propose to distinguish the case of the petitioner, grant him opportunity to meet the same and then 2 pass a reasoned and speaking order. Let it be so done within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The impugned order is set aside in like manner as C.W.J.C. No. 14474 of 2009 to enable the respondents to pass fresh appropriate orders. The writ application stands disposed of. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)