IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 764 of 2011. Decided on: 25th February, 2011. Pallavi. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner, who is under aged to be appointed as Anganwari worker claims that appointment may be given being the only candidate, who applied for the post of Anganwari worker at Anganwari Centre, Saneka under CDPO, Nurpur. It is submitted that the petitioner belongs to BPL family and she was the only candidate. It is the Government alone, which can do anything in the matter. Therefore, the petitioner may approach the first respondent, in which case the first respondent will take appropriate action in accordance with law and justice. The petitioner may immediately produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 25th February, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr) Judge.