IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 20th day of December, 2011 1st Bail Application No.1208 of 2011 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE 1- Laxmi Chand S/o Late Fool Chand. 2- Ghanshyam S/o Late Fool Chand. 3- Sunder Shyam S/o Late Fool Chand. All R/o Baniyawala, P.S. Basant Vihar, District Dehradun. ………Applicants Versus tate of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party S Arising out of F.I.R./Case Crime No. 142 of 2011, Under Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of I.P.C. Police Station- Kotwali, District– ehradun. D Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, Advocate, present for the applicants. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder, present for the State. Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate, present for the complainant. Heard. Applicants Laxmi Chand, Ghanshyam and Sunder Shyam, who are in jail in connection with F.I.R./Crime No.142 of 2011, relating to offences punishable Under Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali, District Dehradun, have sought their release on bail. 2 Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that complainant, who is an Advocate, has abused the process by getting lodged the First Information Report, after obtaining orders under Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C. It is submitted that admittedly, the petitioners are co-sharers in the property in question. It is further pleaded that they have sold only their share. On the other hand, learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the bail application, and pleaded that the complainant’s share has also been sold by the applicants. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going though the papers on record, without expressing any opinion, as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicants deserve bail The bail application is allowed. Let the applicants Laxmi Chand, Ghanshyam and Sunder Shyam, be released on bail on their executing personal bond by each one of them and furnishing two sureties for each one of them, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 20.12.2011 JM