IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 6TH JUNE 2008 / 16TH JYAISHTA 1930 LA.App..No. 791 of 2006() ------------------------- LAR.396/1996 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... APPELLANT: RESPONDENT ---------------------- STATE OF KERALA BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANTH BALAJI RESPONDENTS: CLAIMANTS ----------------------- 1. JANAKI, KOZHIPPURAVILAKOM, T.C.30/545, NEAR MOONNAMMANAKKAL, PETTAH WARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. (DIED) 2. PRAKASINI, KOZHIPPURAVILAKOM, T.C.30/545, NEAR MOONNAMMANAKKAL, PETTAH WARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. MINI, KOZHIPPURAVILAKOM, T.C.30/545, NEAR MOONNAMMANAKKAL, PETTAH WARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. RINI, KOZHIPPURAVILAKOM, T.C.30/545, NEAR MOONNAMMANAKKAL, PETTAH WARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. RAJEEV, KOZHIPPURAVILAKOM, T.C.30/545, NEAR MOONNAMMANAKKAL, PETTAH WARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. DASAPPAN, KOZHIPPURAVILAKOM, T.C.30/545, NEAR MOONNAMMANAKKAL, PETTAH WARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 7. PREMA, KOZHIPPURAVILAKOM, T.C.30/545, NEAR MOONNAMMANAKKAL, PETTAH WARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON I.A. NO.4548/2006 IN L.A.A. 791/2006 DISMISSED 6.6.2008 SD/- PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- L.A.A.NO. 791 of 2006 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of June , 2008 JUDGMENT This appeal by the Government pertains to the acquisition in Kadakampally village for the purpose of doubling of Railway line between Kollam and Thiruvananthapuram. The notification under Section 4 (1) was on 1.4.1993. The awarding officer awarded land value at the rate of Rs.29,001/- per Are. The Reference Court relying mainly on Ext.A1 judgment of the same court, re-fixed the compensation as Rs.37,462/- per Are. Having gone through the judgment of the Reference Court, I am convinced that the approach of the Reference Court was quite reasonable. Moreover, the learned Government Pleader fairly conceded that Ext.A1 has attained finality in the sense that the appeal preferred by the Government against Ext.A1 has now been dismissed. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed in limine. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE dpk