IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.582 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1006 OF 2002 Shri Ramesh Saduram Taurani .. Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ... Mr.A.H.H. Ponde for the applicant. Mr.R. More, APP for the respondent. CORAM : D.G.Karnik and CORAM : D.G.Karnik and CORAM : D.G.Karnik and A.A. Sayed, JJ A.A. Sayed, JJ A.A. Sayed, JJ (Vacation Court) (Vacation Court) (Vacation Court) DATED : 16th May 2007. DATED : 16th May 2007. DATED : 16th May 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is the tenth application by the accused, who was acquitted and is facing appeal against the acquittal, for permission to go abroad in relation to his business of film production. On nine earlier occasions, similar permissions were granted and the conditions on which the permission was granted were abided. Learned APP has no objection for grant of the permission to go abroad till 30th June 2007 subject to the same terms and conditions on which earlier permission was granted by the order dated 2nd May 2005 passed in Criminal Application no.1369 of 2005. 3. Accordingly, permission is granted to the applicant to go abroad between 20th May 2007 and 30th June 2007 as per the itinerary mentioned in paragraph no.16 of the application subject to the terms and conditions imposed by the order dated 2nd May 2005 in Criminal Application no.1369 of 2006. As regards the permission for going abroad from 30th June 2007 is concerned, let the petition be placed before the regular court on re-opening of the court. 4. Before leaving the country, applicant shall intimate his cell number which should have roaming facility at all places he would be visiting. (D.G.KARNIK, J) , J) , J) (A.A. SAYED, J)