1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6379 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr.S.S. Kazi Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. N.B. Narwade Advocate for Respondent Nos.1-A to 1-G. CORAM: K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 25TH SEPTEMBER, 2009. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for Respondents. By this Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Petitioner - original plaintiff challenges the order dated 27th June, 2009 passed by learned IInd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Newasa below Exhibit 135 in Regular Civil Suit No.206 of 1993 by which the trial Court allowed application filed by Respondent Nos. 1-A to 1-G for setting aside 'no written statement' order and allowing them to adopt the written statement filed by Kamruddin Ramzoddin Shaikh (deceased defendant No.1). 2. After hearing both the sides at 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders length, learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 1-A to 1-G states that these Respondents are ready and willing to make a statement before this Court that they will not press their application Exhibit 169 under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure dated 27th February, 2009 filed before the trial Court for amendment of their written statement. To that effect learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 1-A to 1-G filed purshis dated 25th September, 2009. The same is taken on record and marked as 'X' for identification. 3. In view of the purshis dated 25th September, 2009, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner does not want to press the present Writ Petition and therefore he seeks leave to withdraw the present Petition. Leave granted. Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. [K.K. TATED, J.] asb/SEPT09/wp6379.09