IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3238 OF 2009 in SUIT NO. 1928 OF 2000 Mr.Padmanabh Shetty ....Plainitff Vs Mr.Raghu G.Shetty ...Defendant. Ms.Pratibha Berade i,b Mr.S.S.Kudalkar for Plaintiff Mr. Vimlesh Singh for Defendant CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATE : 16TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C. 1. The motion is filed by the plaintiff for expeditious hearing of the suit on the ground that the plaintiff is a senior citizen. Para 2 of the affidavit in support of the notice of motion shows that the plaintiff is 62 years of age. Ld.counsel for the defendant submits that in order to claim senior citizenship for the purpose of expeditious hearing of the proceedings the plaintiff must show that he is 65 years of age. This statement is not disputed by the plaintiff. The Suit is for recovery of money. Old matters are pending and therefore plaintiff cannot claim priority for hearing. Motion is dismissed. Needless to mention that the plaintiff is at liberty to file a motion for expeditious hearing after the plaintiff complete 65 years of age. R. V. MORE, J.