IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1637 of 2010 AJOY KUMAR MITRA Versus TRIPURARI SHARAN & ORS. ----------- 2 21/07/2010 It is the statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner that a typographical mistake has occurred in the order dated 10.2.2010 passed in M.J.C. No.1804 of 2009 specially paragraph 2 of the said order in relation to some of the so called advances which had been shown against him in the order contained in annexure-11. In this regard, let it be recorded that the narration should read in the order dated 10.2.2010 at paragraph 2, page 2, second line from the top after the word “secondly” thus: “that the petitioner had not taken any advance while posted at Munger but has been paid advance from Muzaffarpur to the tune of Rs.6000/-, hence Rs.9500/- has been deducted in excess. Petitioner has also not taken advance from Vaishali to the tune of Rs.20,000/-. He had taken scooter advance of Rs.12000/- which was deducted from his salary in due course in instalments and no due remains. A total deduction of Rs.32000/- has been wrongly deducted. All told, total excess deduction adds upto - 2 - Rs.41,500/-.” With this clarification, this modification application is allowed. Rest of the order dated 10.2.2010 shall remain the same. AMIN (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)