1 SBCivil Writ Petition No.11632/2010 Pinky Meena & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of Order :: 15 th December, 2010 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Dhirendra Pandey, for the petitioners. .... Under the advertisement dated 08.08.2008 the Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer invited applications from eligible desirous candidates to appear in Teacher Gr.II Competitive Examinations 2008 conducted for the purpose of recruitment to the post of Teacher Gr.II. The examination was not conducted by the Commission for about two years, due to certain obvious reasons, thus, by a corrigendum dated 17.8.2010 the last date for submitting applications which was 01.10.2008 i the original advertisement was extended upto 03.09.2010. The petitioners have applied to face the process of selection which is to be commenced from 19.12.2010, as per the time table declared by the Commission, on 21.11.2010. By this petition for writ postponement of the process of selection is claimed on the count that the persons who applied for appearing in the examination concerned in the year 2008 itself shall be 2 having much more time to prepare themselves vis-a-vis the petitioners who submitted applications to appear in the examination concerned in the year 2010. I do not find any merit in this petition for writ and that is fundamentally misconceived. The process of selection has already been delayed by about two years and now a direction is sought for postponement of the same on absolutely a flimsy ground. The comparison sought to be made by the petitioners with the persons who applied for appearing in the examinations in the year 2008 is absolutely misconceived. There is no right of any person for getting equal time to get themselves prepared for appearing in the examination. Beside that the term for getting prepared for examination is quite indefinite and on basis of that no process of selection can be deferred. The petition for writ is accordingly dismissed. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. kkm/ps.