IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 8095 of 2010 Decided on 23.12.2010. Ubar Chand ..…Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Narender Sharma, Advocate, For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice (oral). The petition has been filed with the following prayer :- “To issue writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize/grant work charge status to the petitioner w.e.f 1.4.2002 and to release all consequential releifs as applicable to regular employee. To award the costs of the petition in favour of the petitioner.” 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issues involved in this case regarding regularization/conferment of work charge status and counting of 50% daily wage services are covered by the judgments rendered in Mool Raj Upadhaya vs State of Himachal Pradesh and others, 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316 and State of Himachal Pradesh & others vs. Sarab Dayal in CWP No. 180 of 2001, decided on 19.7.2007. 3. As far as the contention regarding issue covered under Sarb Dyal’s case is concerned, action in the light of 2 said judgment shall l be taken by the respondents only subject to outcome of the matter now pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. However, so far as contention regarding issue covered under Mool Raj Upadhaya’s case, is concerned, action by the respondents in the light of said judgment shall be taken within four months from the date of production of copy of this judgment by the petitioner before the second respondent. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice ( Justice V.K.Sharma), Judge. 23rd December, 2010 LSP/Varinder