WWW-W mm L)m; IQET OS t Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Law or the State/respondents. With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard fmauy. Counsel for the petitioner want to withdraw the present petitioh with liberty to file fresh representation befo e the State of Chhattisgarh in view of the circular dated 09-06-2008 He ho Issued for deciding ms representation State has no ob;ection Accordingly the writ petition bf two months from the date of reoei expectedto be decided by the oompet four months from the date of its receipt. It is made clear that this Coutt the merits of the case and the author' decide the representét/ign strictly in aoc Jrdanoe with iaw. Tumane ever submits that direction may‘ be xpeditlously to which counset for the is dismissed as withdrawn wrth aforesaid liberty. The representation if tiled bythe petitioner Within a period t of copy of this order,‘ the same is nt authority within a further period of as not expressed any opinion upon s concerned would be at liberty to Wr¥k Sdl— Mamndra Mohan $hrwa5tava Judge