,/ ) 32# * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1973/2010 O/o SANJAY NARULA ..... Petitioner versus Through: Mr. Rajiv Thukral, Advocate along with the Petitioner. STATE & ORS. . .... Respondents CORAM: Through: Mr. Pawan Bahl, APP for the State along with Inspector Ved Bhushan, SHO Model Town, Inspector Dharam Pal, Investigating Officewr, PS J ahangir Puri, Delhi and SI Anil Kumar, PS Model Town. Respondent No.2 in person. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER 08.02.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 777/2006 under Sections J) 498A/406/494/34 IPC registered at PS Model Town, Delhi. The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Meenu Malik is present in person and is identified by the Investigating Officer Inspector Dharampal Singh, PS Jahangir Puri, Delhi. She states that the Petitioner and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In tenns of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner and Respondent No. 2/complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent C'RL.M C. 197312010 Page 1of3 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified on 20 111 October, 2007. Respondent No. 2/Complainant further states that she has received a sum of Rupees Five Lakhs in full and fmal settlement of all her claims of stridhan, alimony and maintenance and also maintenance of the children. The Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Narula is also present in person and is identified by his counsel. He states that the custody of the children will remain with the Respondent No. 2 Respondent No.2 states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. Thus, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 777/2006 under Sections 498A/406/494/34 IPC registered at PS Model Town, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. CRL.M.C. 197312010 Page 2 o/3 b 7 Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements before this Court. The petition is disposed of. t::;;Tt:;;;;A, J. FEBRUARY 08, 2011 vn CRL.MC. 197312010 Page3of3