1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 884 OF 2009 M/s Sai Krushna Dairy, through its Manager, Dattatraya s/o Parshuram Gangarde ...Petitioner VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents ..... Shri R.R.Karpe, advocate holding for Shri Sandeep S. Deshmukh, advocate for the petitioner Shri K.S.Patil, A.P.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 5 Shri A.S.Zarekar, advocate for respondent nos. 2 and 3 Shri K.S.Bhore, advocate for respondent no.4. ..... CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, JJ. DATED : 11.02.2010 ORAL ORDER 1 This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner/original complainant seeking directions to the respondents/police 2 authorities for addition of Sections 403, 406, 409 and 418 of the Indian Penal Code against the present respondent nos. 2 to 4. 2 Undisputedly, on the basis of the complaint of the petitioner, an offence came to be registered under Section 420 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code vide Crime No. 66 of 2009, by Karjat police station, Taluka Karjat, District Ahmednagar. According to the petitioner, perusal of the first information report discloses the commission of the offence under Sections 403, 406, 409 and 418 of the Indian Penal Code by the respondent/accused. 3 Learned A.P.P., on instructions, states that the investigation would be completed within four weeks from today and final report thereof would be submitted before the learned Magistrate having the jurisdiction in respect of trial of the said offence. 4 According to us, the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner cannot be granted, as it would amount to interference in the investigation. In any event, the petitioner, who is the complainant, can urge before the Trial Court at the 3 time of framing of charge in respect of commission of the offences by the respondents other than the offences, under which chargesheet would be filed. 5 In the light of the matter, therefore, according to us, no interference is called for. We accordingly dismiss this petition, with liberty as stated above, with no order as to costs. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (P.V.HARDAS, J.) dbm/crwp884.09