^•' IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) IW.P. (CRNo. ...'S.^5.t......./20iei ^P^\ PETITIONER Smt. Ayesha Khan @ Kajol W/o. Ganesh Raj; Aged about - 21 Year; R/o. - Shri Vihar Sarakanda, Bilaspur; Tahsil & District - Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENDS : ^l. 3. -^"^ f^/ V^ 1.-- < s.n.. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary General Adininistrative Departnient, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralay Raipur (C.G.) Director Ges&eral of Poliee State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) Inspector Geaeral of Poliee, Bilaspur Range, Near Nehai-u Chowk Bilaspur (C.G.) 7^, ^ ^Tv^ 5. Police, Bilaspur, S. P. Office Bilaspur (C.G.) Smt. Sandlaya Patel W/o. Sanjay Patel; Aged about - 23 Year; R/o. - Balko Nagar Korba (C.G.) ^•6. Ganesh Raj @ Salamsin Rajja S/o. Arjun Singh Gond; Occupation - Police Constable No. - 290; Permanent R/o. - Kuchaina; Tahsil & District - Korba (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TSE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ~';1 ]0f^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETITION (Cr.) N0.3427 OF 2011 Smt. Ayesha Khan @ Kajol Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others RESPONDENTS (Writ Petition under Articles 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Vineet Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 5th day of July, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed an FIR, thereagainst, after investigation, the charge sheet has been filed before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bilaspur Learned counsel submits that the investigation has not been done properly. 2. Be that as it may, once the charge sheet has been filed, this Court cannot monitor the case pending before the Court below. Thus, on tha request of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to take appropriate steps before the trial Court, under the provisions of law. 3. It is ordered. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as aforestated. i.'^ Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge