IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2393 of 1987 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- NITABEN J. PATEL Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 2393 of 1987 MR JJ YAJNIK for Petitioner M/S PATEL ADVOCATES for Respondent No. 1, 3 MR DD VYAS for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD Date of decision: 08/09/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT #. Learned Advocate Mr.Pravin Gondaliya seeks permission to withdraw the petition stating that the petitioner will make representation to the respondent No.2 - District Panchayat, Rajkot in respect of the claims made in the petition including the question of seniority and in case any adverse order is passed, upon appreciation of the representation, the petitioner will pursue further remedy. #. Mr.Vyas, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 is present in the Court. In view of statement made by Mr.Gondaliya for the petitioner, the petition is permitted to be withdrawn, at this stage. Mr.Gondaliya, learned advocate for the petitioner states that the petitioner will make necessary representation immediately within a period of 3 weeks from today. Immediately on receipt of the representation, the authority shall consider the same on merits, objectively, within a period of two months from the date of receipt and pass appropriate order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. #. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. The status and the resultant service benefits of the petitioner which was granted by this Court on 27th May, 1987 by interim order will continue till disposal of the representation. Liberty to revive the petition in case of difficulty. Rule discharged. No costs. Date : 8-9-2000 [H.K.Rathod, J.] #kailash#