IN THEE-£61k COURT OF JUDxCATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BELASPUR w.p.No.2"f3fJ’ /2oo3 M” Rajendra Nath Panigrahi 8/0 B.N. Panigrahi, Aged about 49 years, R/o Village ‘Ichhapur' Tahsil Jagdalpur,Distt.Bastar (CG) EDETITIONER VERSUS : 1) State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Revenue Departmyegyt DKS Bhawan, Raigur (CG) . 2) Shri Jayendra Lal Devangan Patwari, P.H.N0.Antagarh Revenue Inspector Circle Antagarh, District Kanker (CG) . /’ / WRIT PETITION UNDER Ax‘UI‘ICLE 226/227 OF TrIE CONSTITUTION OF r a-“ 1 «ma C 1: :ma—x'g'g‘nnar 5/9/2003 Smt. Chitra Shitvastava, Panel Lawyer, for the State on advance cépy. The petitioner haé chaHenged by this writ 'paition theyorder/dated 30/7/2003 (mam-Pu), by wmc' Halka No.34, Iehehhapm‘ Revenue Bastar to Patwari Halka N0. An DistxietKanker. The petitioner’s main gieva Patwan' Halka No.34,- Ichehhapur } distn'et Bastar and by the impugned Halka No. A'ntagarh, Revenue gnsp maintained district-wise and under no V, seniority lists of the Patwam are i circumstances he (raw be transferred horn one district to another. The. Patwaris are appointed for a particular district and they cannot be transferred out of district. Therefore, the impu Having heard the ieamed c unsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of tlr case, the petitioner is allowed to make a r/ 1 he has been transferred from Patwari Inspector Circle, tehsil Jagd‘alpur, district tagarh, Revenue Inspector Circle No.5, ice is that he is working as Patwan in ievenue Inspector Circle, tehsil Jagdalpur,’ order he has been transferred to Patwan' ‘ ‘ eetor Circle No.5; District Kanker. ' The d order is not justihed. Heard Shri P. Diwaker for the qetitioner. XI—HC—22 lagwg mmm§1%% '. _ 2" representatian to respondent no.1 W1 grievances, which gre mentioned in decide this representation within a »0bjective‘ manner giVmg reasons z representation of the petitioner. 1. remain in aheyance. With the aforesaid observations in view of the above, MWE ' udisposed 0f. WW/ mwnfaram $Wm thin a pexiod of ten days raising ail his the petition, and respondent i101 will peiiod of another thirty days in an md pass an appropriate/“gidei‘ on the ‘ili the decision, the traiisfei‘ order wiil EL" \L-(C‘BHADoc ‘ f‘n‘Judge [me nevi , this writ petition is disposed of. ?. No.2483/03 and LA. No.8210f03 stand