WP(C) 9281/2004 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA The petitioners who are physically handicapped persons have claimed appo intment against 3% quota earmarked for the physically disabled persons. Needless to say that for operation of the quota, the petitioners will have to be selecte d candidates which they are not. As per the affidavit filed by the respondents, there is also ban on appointment. As per the said affidavit, as and when ban wil l be lifted and the selection is conducted the case of the petitioners will be c onsidered as per their eligibility in the selection. In view of the above, no direction can be issued for appointment of the petitioners without any selection. However, it is provided that as and when the respondents shall conduct the selection and in the event of offering candidature s by the petitioners, their cases will be considered strictly in accordance with rules. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by now t he petitioners must have become overaged. If that be so and in the event of sele ction, the authorities may consider relaxation of the age of the petitioners in accordance with law.