1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICTURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. O R D E R Devi Lal. Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2190/2003. ... Date of Order: January 22, 2007 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. R.K. Choudhary, for the petitioner. Mr. S.N. Tiwari, Deputy Govt. Advocate. Mr. Vijay Bishnoi, for the non-petitioner No. 2. BY THE COURT: By the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, mainly the petitioner has impugned the order Annx.7 dated 30-11-2002 passed by the Arbitrator-cum- the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Rajasthan in Suit No.5/2002 filed by the petitioner. While deciding the suit of the petitioner, the matter was remanded to the non-petitioner No.2 to decide it afresh in the light of the directions issued by the Arbitrator cum Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Rajasthan. In compliance of the order Annx.7 dated 30-11- 2002, the non-petitioner No.2, vide Annx.R/1 dated 26-7-2003, decided the matter afresh holding therein that the petitioner has 2 not completed the requisite period of service and he was temporarily engaged only for the a few days, initially for 38 days and again for a few days and, therefore, he is not entitled for any relief. Even otherwise, the writ petition against Marketing Co-operative Societies is not maintainable for the reason that the Bilara Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd. does not come within the meaning of “State” as envisaged under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition has no force and it is accordingly dismissed. However, it is open for the petitioner, if he is aggrieved by the order Annx.R/1, to approach before the Arbitrator cum Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Rajasthan, which remanded the matter vide order Annx.7 dated 30.11.2002. There shall be no order as to costs. (H.R. PANWAR), J. mcs