IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9552 of 2009 Jugesh Devi & others Vs. The State of Haryana & others Present: Mr.D.S.Patwalia, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana, for the State. Mr.Sanjeev Bansal, Advocate with Mr.Pardeep Solath, Advocate, for respondent Nos.3 to 9. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioners have filed this writ petition with a grievance that respondent Nos.3 to 26 were given antedated promotion, which ultimately came to be reflected in the seniority list. The petitioners, therefore, challenged the action of the respondents in giving antedated promotion to the said respondents and consequential change in their seniority. During the pendency of this writ petition, official respondents have passed an order (Annexure P25) withdrawing the antedated promotion given to respondent Nos.3 to 26. Accordingly, the main prayer made in the writ petition stands granted. The writ petition, therefore, is rendered infructuous. The submission by the counsel for the petitioners is that effect of withdrawal of antedated promotion has not yet been reflected for change in the seniority list. It is expected from the Government to look into the consequential effect of the order withdrawing the antedated promotion and give effect thereto. The petitioners may file a representation seeking their seniority as per the changed position, which, if filed, may be decided in some time bound period. The writ petition otherwise is disposed of as infructuous. May 05, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE