IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 25TH OCTOBER 2011 / 3RD KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28301 of 2011(K) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ LIJO GEORGE C., S/O.C.R.GEORGE, AGED 25 YEARS, FORMERLY LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, HIGH SCHOOL, THIRUVALAYANNUR, KANNUR-VADAKKEKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. (RESIDING AT CHITTILAPPILLY HOUSE, PERAMANGALAM, THRISSUR-680 545). BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,TRIVANDRUM-695001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, TRIVANDRUM-695014. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THRISSUR AT AYYANTHOLE-680503. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 506. 5. THE MANAGER, HIGH SCHOOL, THIRUVALAYANNUR, KALLUR-VADAKKEKKAD THRISSUR DISTRICT-679562. STATE ATTORNEY SRI.VIIIIJAYARAGHAVAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.28301/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE ORDER OF APPOINTMENT OF THE PETITIONER DTD. 14.6.07. P2:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B5-60/08/K.DIS OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHAVAKKAD DTD. 11.2.2008. P3:- COPY OF THE APPEAL OF THE MANAGER OF THE SCHOOL DTD.25.2.2008. P4:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B4-4240/08/K.DIS OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION DT.D 27.7.08. P5:- COPY OF THE REVISION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 6.9.2008. P6:-COP G.O.(P) NO.317/05/G.EDN. OF THE GOVERNMENT DTD. 17.8.05. P7:- COPY OF THE G.O.(P) NO.10/10/G.EDN. OF THE GOVERNMENT DTD. 12.1.2010. P8:- COPY OF THE REVISION FILED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DTD. 29.9.2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE tss T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 28301 of 2011-K - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 25th day of October, 2011. JUDGMENT The non approval of appointment of the petitioner as L.P.S.A. pursuant to Ext.P1 appointment order, has resulted in the petitioner approaching the revisional authority, viz. the Government by filing Ext.P8 revision petition. The approval was declined relying upon the ban order, G.O.(P) No.317/05/G.Edn. dated 17.8.2005, as evident from Ext.P2 order. The appeal filed by the Manager also stands rejected. 2. Learned State Attorney takes notice for respondents 1 to 4. 3. There will be a direction to the Government to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P8 revision petition after hearing the petitioner and the Manager, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will forward a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the revision petition before the Government for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/