IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10460 of 2009 1. Rajeshwar Mahto, son of Late Saukhi Mahto, Peon, Balika Uccha Vidyalaya, Mahanar, Police Station, Mahanar, District- Vaishali (Hajipur). 2. Amarjeet Singh, son of Late Rajeshwar Singh, Peon, Jagadish Uccha Vidyalaya, Chamarehraura, P.S.-Mahanar, District- Vaishali (Hajipur). 3. Umesh Prasad Singh, son of Late Jogendra Singh (Peon), Maharani Kunwar Uccha Vidyalaya, Vajitpur, Dumari, P.S.- Sahadiya, District-Vaishali (Hajipur). ..........Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director of Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Education Officer, Vaishali (Hajipur). 4. The Headmaster, Balika Uccha Vidyalaya, Mahanar, P.S.- Mahanar, District-Vaishali (Hajipur). 5. The Head Master, Jagadish Uccha Vidyalaya, Chamarehraura, P.S.-Mahanar, District-Vaishali (Hajipur). 6. The Head Master, Maharani Kunwar Uccha Vidyalaya, Vajitpur, Dumari, P.S.-Sahadiya, District-Vaishali (Hajipur). .............Respondents. ----------- 2/ 05.10.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. The Petitioners are working as Peon in different High Schools. Their grievance is that a circular issued by the Director of Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar to the Head masters of the different schools, is wrongly being interpreted by the Headmasters of their respective schools. They are being asked to discharge duties as Peon in the day time and as a night guard at night, although according to circular, they can be asked to work either in day time at night. I do not find any such statement in the writ application. Annexure-2 only shows that petitioners have been asked to discharge duties for 15 days in a month as a Peon and on another 15 days as night guard. This does not show that they are being asked to discharge duties as Peon and night guards, simultaneously during day time and in the night. As stated by the petitioners’ counsel representations filed by them, are being pending for consideration before the competent authority. That may be considered and disposed of by the competent authority. This application is dismissed. Sanjeet (Mridula Mishra, J.)