IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-10352 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 7.9.2011 Kaptan Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Mr.Wazir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Sandeep Mann, Sr.DAG, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr.Pankaj Bali, Advocate for respondent No.6. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. Reply to the petition has been filed, according to which, the FIR in question has been investigated and challan has been submitted. It has been specifically averred in para 7 of the reply that Section 307 IPC was deleted as the allegations to that effect were not substantiated. However, the challan/report regarding the commission of offence under Sections 323, 324, 506, 34 IPC has been submitted. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the investigation has not been conducted fairly and that number of persons whom he had named have been left out. Crl.Misc.No.M-10352 of 2011 (O&M) -2- On due consideration of the matter, I am of the opinion that the power under Sections 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be exercised to channelise the investigation in a particular way. The challan having been submitted, the petitioner has ample remedies before the learned trial Court by making appropriate prayer in case some persons have been erroneously left out and if there is sufficient material against them. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail himself of the remedies that are available to him under the law and move the learned trial Court appropriately. 7.9.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss