[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR J U D G M E N T S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO. 1306/2003 SMT. SUSHILA & ORS. Vs. SHRI MAHAVEER & ORS. Date: 07.03.2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE Mr. K.N. Tiwari with ) Mr. Ram Singh )for the appellants. Mr. J.K. Yogi for the respondent No.1. Mr. Arvind Sharma for ) Mr. Anurag Sharma )for the respondent No.2. Mr. A.K. Pareek with ) Ms. Rani Bhandari ) for the respondent No.3 **** The claimants-appellants have preferred the instant civil misc. appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 against the Award dated 02.01.2003 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur (for short 'the Tribunal') in M.A.C.T. Case No. 468/1997, whereby compensation to the tune of Rs. 3,57,800/- has been awarded in favour of the appellants along with interest @ 9% p.a. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant for seeking enhancement of the compensation on the ground that the income of the deceased has not rightly been considered by the Tribunal as at the time of accident the deceased was earning Rs. 4,000/- per month and the Tribunal has seriously erred in considering the income of the deceased as Rs. 2,100/- per month. [2] It is also contended on behalf of the appellants that looking to the age of the deceased, multiplier of 17 is not applicable and having considered the age as well as the income part of the deceased which has not been properly considered and the multiplier has also not been properly considered by the Tribunal and only awarded a sum of Rs. 3,57,800/- in favour of the appellants vide impugned Award dated 02.01.2003, therefore, the present appeal has been filed by the appellants for enhancement of compensation. Having heard rival submissions of the respective parties and after carefully going through the record of the case as also the impugned Award dated 02.01.2003 passed by the Tribunal, it is no doubt that the appellants have contended that at the time of the accident, the deceased was earning Rs. 4,000/- per month but no document or certificate to this effect has been submitted by the appellants and, therefore, as the deceased was working in carpet (Galicha) factory at the time of accident, the Tribunal has rightly considered the income of the deceased as Rs, 2,100/- per month which is admissible to the technical worker and has rightly applied the multiplier looking to the age and awarded a compensation to the tune of Rs. 3,57,800/- in favour of the appellants vide its impugned Award dated 02.01.2003, which cannot said [3] to be inadequate and as the appellants have not been able to make out any case for enhancement of the compensation awarded, no interference whatsoever is required by this Court in the impugned Award dated 02.01.2003 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur. Consequently, the present civil misc. appeal fails being devoid of merit and the same is hereby dismissed. Record be sent back. (K.S. RATHORE)J. /KKC/