IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 7399 of 2010 Date of Decision: 27.4.2010 Shambhu Dayal Gupta ....Petitioner. Versus Chief Administrator, Haryana Agricultural Marketing Board ...Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Narender Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. By way of instant petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the charge-sheet dated 6.6.2006 (Annexure P-1) on the basis of which the respondent has refused to release the retiral benefits including gratuity, leave encashment and commuted leave etc. to him. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has sent a legal notice dated 18.11.2009 (Annexure P-2) to the respondent for the same relief as claimed in this writ petition but no action has been taken thereon so far and he shall feel satisfied if a direction is issued to him to decide the same in a given time frame. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the file, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to take a decision on the legal notice (Annexure P-2) sent by the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order by passing a speaking order. April 27, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE