wp.1115-2011.sxw acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1115 OF 2011 Annasaheb Dattatray Mane …Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra . ...Respondent. ----- Mr. Sachin Patil i/b Mr.Devendra Singh, for the Petitioner. Ms. M.H. Mhatre,APP for the State. Mr. A.A. Mir i/b MIR Associates, for Accused-Respondent No.1 ---- CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D. SALVI, JJ. JULY 04, 2011. P.C. 1. We have heard Mr.Patil, the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In case the petitioner’s allegation that an order of injunction passed in his favour was violated by the defendant, his remedy is in the very same suit to file an application for contempt, so as to punish the defendant. 3. Hence, this is not a fit case to show our indulgence for entertaining the Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 1 wp.1115-2011.sxw 4. The Petition is disposed with liberty as is available in law. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.) 2