Sing!e Eamh @ g 0F'h7,‘ @ I?! TEEE HEé‘i-Ei C3'6ET $F CHEEATTISGAEI’E AT BILA$PEIR twza ."uu2096 WRIT PETITION NO. H.S. Sakarwar S/o Late Jaipal/ Singh Sakarwar, aged about 59 years, Heati Master, Govt. Middle School, Sawnkar, Block Agaltarwag District—Jam'geer—ChampajC.G). PETITigNER VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through a” xSecretary Educai’ion Department D.K.S. Bhavan Raipur {C.G.) 2. The CoHector Jarijgeer-Champa / Dist. Janjgeer Champs. (C.G‘) 3. District Education Ofticer Janjgeer a Dist. Janjgeer-Champa (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Akaltara , and Dist Janjgeer—Champa (C.G.) RESPOEBEHTS x, WRIT PETITION UNDER‘ ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INBIA FQR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CEERTIGRERI, MAKBAMUS, PROHIBITION AND a OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTLQILSVLQQEE OR ORDERES: u XI-HC-78 HW,W,W .w§.€.3¢.z.éui.l9¢.... 1H 200 Wm (W) WW‘ WWW WWW WW§WW mmwm $Wm 17.8.2006 Shri RS. Patel, Advocate fur the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy‘ Govt. Advocate for the State on advance copy. Heard; By this petition, the petitioner, o is working as Head Master in Govt. Middle Schooi‘ Sawnkar‘ Block Akaita District Janjgir‘Champa‘ has chaiienged his transfer order dated 7.7.2006 (Anne ure P—1) whereby he has been transferred to Govt. Middle School, Ghutiya, Block lawagarh‘ District Janjglr-Champa. The main ground of challenge i that the petitioner has been transferred during the ban period, which is'agalnst he transfer policy framed by the State for the year 2006-07. Another ground is t at the petitioner is going to retire within a peried of three years and at the fag e d of his career, he has been transferred against the transfer policy of State, ich envisages that if retirement of any employee is due, then he should not be ubjected totransfer. in the circumstances, learned ounsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be allowed to make a d tailed representation to respondent No.2 and in tum, respondent No.2 be direct d to decide the same in accordance with law, to which learned Dy. Govt. Adv. for he State has no objection. Having heard learned counsel fo the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, without eXpressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the petitioner is allowed to mak a detailed representation to respondent No.2 raising all his grievances within 1 days from today along with copy of this petition and in turn, respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of 3O days from the dat of its receipt in accordance with law after considering all the grievances raised by the petitioner. With the direction aforesaid, the etition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.328 106 also stands disposed of. i Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge r , h h