IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7605 of 2010 1. LAKSHMI ROY 2. Chhutahru Roy Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The defence of the petitioners in a Police case under Sections 302/201 and 120(B)/34 is that there is no eye witness to the assault. The victim allegedly left home in the night when there is no statement with whom he left home, even from the case diary the entire discussion in the impugned order does not disclose what is the material for suspicion against the petitioner except they were one of the eight persons who allegedly fifteen days ago had threatened the deceased. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.S.J., F.T.C. No. IV. Supaul in connection with Nirmali P.S. Case No. 40 of 2009. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)