IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 10TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 19TH BHADRA 1929 WA.No. 2212 of 2007 ---------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.23745/2007 Dated 03/08/2007 .................... APPELLANT: PETITIONER ------------------------------------- MRS.TESSY JOHNSON, PROPRIETRIX, M/S.ANNA PAPER CONTAINERS COMPANY, P.B.NO.2, MURINGOOR, CHALAKUDY. BY ADV. SRI.S.K.BALACHANDRAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ----------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE APPELLATE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), AGRICULTURE INCOME TAX & SALES TAX, OFFICE OF THE AAC(APPEALS), ERNAKULAM. 3. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, VAT CIRCLE, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, CHALAKKUDY - 680 307. 4. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, MUKUNDAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.K.B.PRADEEP THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------ W.A.No.2212 of 2007 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 10th day of September, 2007 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. This writ appeal is filed against the orders passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.23745 of 2007 dated 3rd August, 2007. 2. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge in his discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India does not call for any interference in appeal. Therefore, the writ appeal requires to be rejected and it is rejected. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (K.T.SANKARAN) JUDGE vns