IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 3RD ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 27089 of 2009(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- BHAGAVATI RAJAN, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O. PAKKIRI SWAMY, PROPRIETOR, PRIME SAT VISION, THEKKADI JUNCTION, KUMALI, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR SMT.P.A.ANITHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION OFFICE, PEERMADE. 3. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION OFFICE, KUMALI. 4. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, PEERMEDU. 5. VINOD KUMAR, THEKKADY VISION, NEDIYAKALAYIL, 1ST MILE, KUMALI. 6. ANILKUMAR, S.L.V.CABLE NETWORK, VANDIPERIYAR, VANDIPERIYAR P.O., IDUKKI. ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B FOR R1-4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 27089 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 25th September, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Cable T.V Operator. He has entered into an agreement with the Kerala State Electricity Board for using the electric posts of the Board for drawing cable for the purpose of his network. His grievance in this writ petition is that the 2nd respondent is permitting respondents 5 and 6 to draw cables through the same posts in respect of which the petitioner already has an agreement with the Board. The petitioner has filed Ext. P3 complaint in this regard to the 4th respondent. The petitioner now seeks a direction to the 4th respondent to consider Ext. P3 and to pass appropriate orders thereon. 2. Learned counsel for the Board submits that it is more appropriate that the 2nd respondent considers the same. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is disposed with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P3 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as respondents 5 and 6. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.