IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8155 of 2010 LALTI KUWAR @ KUER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Sasaram (Muffasil) P.S.Case No.708/09 dated 5.09.2009 registered under Sections 302, 201/34 of the I.P.C. According to the prosecution case, the accused persons including the petitioner are alleged to have burnt to death one Rinku Devi and her two minor children due to non- fulfillment of demand of dowry. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the mother-in-law of the deceased lady and main allegation is against husband, who is already in jail. It is also submitted that during course of investigation, it was found to be a case under Section 306 and not a case under Section 302 of the IPC. Be that as it may, in view of nature of allegation and in view of the fact that three persons have been burnt to death, this Court is not inclined to accede to the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, it is rejected. 2 The petitioner must surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and if so advised, seek regular bail. If such a prayer is made, then the court below may dispose of the same on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. V.K. Pandey (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)