IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 2ND MARCH 2010 / 11TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 6584 of 2010(W) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.S.MENON ADVOCATE, S.R.M.ROAD ERNAKULAM NORTH KOCHI 682 018. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.RAMAKRISHNAN SMT.P.V.SREELATHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SECRETARY KOCHIN CORPORATION, ERNAKULAM KOCHI-11 2. THE HEALTH OFFICER, KOCHIN CORPORATION, ERNAKULAM KOCHI-11 3. MR.IBAHIM KHAN, PRESIDENT AL AMEN TRUST ADVOCATE, SRM ROAD,KOCHI. SC FOR CORPORATON SRI. S. RAMESH BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.6584 OF 2010 (W) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner's grievance is that, Ext.P7 representation made by him requesting for construction of a drainage is not considered. It is stated that this is despite the fact that he had submitted Ext.P8 reminder as well. 2. I heard the counsel for the petitioner and also the Standing Counsel for the respondents. 3. As stated by the petitioner, if Ext.P7 or Ext.P8 has been received, it is directed that the first respondent shall consider the same and pass orders thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. It is made clear that this court has not considered anything on the merits of the case and it is entirely for the first respondent to deal with the matter. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :