IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI WRIT PETITION NO : 6169 of 1995 Between: P.Subrahmanyam S/o. late P.Venkat Narayana, H.No.1-1-298/1 Ashok Nagar Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND The Special Officer and Competent Authority Urban Land Ceiling, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned notice E/5320/76 Dt.9/3/95 issued by the respondent directing the petitioner to surrender possession of the property in S.No.737/4, Uppal Kalan, Plot No.7 & 8 admeasuring 580.91 sq. mtrs, Hyderabad as void arbitrary, being illegal and unconstitutional the same may be set aside and issue such other order or directions. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.K.K.WAGHRAY Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER : (Per Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, J) The grievance of the petitioner is that after exemption was granted to him under The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) and after he constructed a house, in 1995 a notice under Section 10 of the Act had been issued. The learned Counsel for respondent fairly concedes that there has been a mistake in issuing notice to the petitioner because an exemption had already been granted in his favour. In view of this statement, no further orders are necessary. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. _______________ 16th December, 2004 BILAL NAZKI, J ajr To 1 The Special Officer and Competent Authority Urban Land Ceiling, Hyderabad 2 Two C.Cs., to the G.P. for Revenue, High Court buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 3 Two C.D. copies.