IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.14470 of 2002 (O&M) Date of decision:05.01.2011 Shri Shiv Nandan Mehto ....Petitioner versus Presiding Officer, Labour Court-II, Faridabad and another ..Respondents II. CWP No.3436 of 2003 (O&M) Kirpa Shankar ....Petitioner versus Presiding Officer, Labour Court-II, Faridabad and another ..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Ms. Abha Rathore, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate, and Mr. Aseem Aggarwal, Advocate, for the respondent. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? ---- K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. The application is filed at the instance of the management to say that there has been a settlement between the management and the workman and in terms of the said settlement, the prayer for reinstatement has become unavailable and the writ petition itself has CWP No.14470 of 2002 (O&M) - 2 - become infructuous. The settlement filed is taken on record and the writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. 2. Both the writ petitions are disposed of as such. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 05.01.2011 sanjeev