1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 1285 OF 2009 Mohan Tulshiram Navale and others Versus The State of Maharashtra and another *** Mr. Amol Sawant, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. V. D. Godbharle, A.P.P. for the Respondent / State. *** CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 1st OCTOBER, 2009. 1. Heard Mr. Amol Sawant for the Applicant. Respondent No.2 served, however, absent. Separate service by Registered Post A.D. was sent for which affidavit of service is filed by Sunil Laxman Aglave. 2. Heard. Rule, returnable forthwith. 3. The names of the witnesses disclosed in the final report illustrate that they are from Dhule. The accused/ applicants are residing at Dhule. The complainant is also residing at Dhule. The complaint dated 23rd March, 2007 involves offence under 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. sections 143, 147, 149, 323, 326, 324, 504, 506 of IPC and under section 3 (1) (x) of ST & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The alleged incident referred by the complainant indeed has taken place at Railway Station, Dhule or the platform of the Railway Station. It is in this scenario instead of present Sessions Case to be taken up at the Special Judge, Jalgaon, it should be tried at the Special Judge, Sessions Court, Dhule. I do no see any prejudice to the complainant in such transfer of the matter. Criminal application allowed. Rule made absolute. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:01/10/2009. ans/1285