CWP(T) 3979/2008. 26.2.2009. Present: Mr.Y.P.S.Dhaulta, counsel for the Petitioner. Mr.Vivek Thakur, Addl. Advocate General For the respondents. As per reply filed by the State the petitioner was, in fact, promoted on adhoc basis in terms of order dated 29th December, 1989. In the reply the respondents have categorically mentioned that there are sufficient promotional avenues and if the petitioner is found eligible she would be promoted as per R & P Rules. In this view of the matter, the prayer of the petitioner is mis-conceived. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. (Sanjay Karol),J. February 26, 2009(R)