Civil Revision No. 2392 of 2010(O&M) 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 2392 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 6.7.2010 Purshottam …Petitioner Versus Ashok Kumar and Another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Sonak, Advocate for respondent No.1. None for respondent No.2. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the eviction petition, filed by respondent No.1, ejectment of the petitioner/tenant was ordered on the ground of subletting and non-payment of rent. Learned counsel further submits that aggrieved against the same, the petitioner has filed an appeal wherein the finding of subletting was set aside, however, his eviction, on the ground of non-payment of rent was upheld as the Court held that the petitioner has failed to prove that the rent was paid to the landlord. Along with the present revision petition, against orders dated 4.6.2008, passed by the Rent Controller, Narnaul, and dated 24.10.2009, passed by the Appellate Authority, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay is also listed. Reply to the same has been filed. Civil Revision No. 2392 of 2010(O&M) 2 During the course of arguments, a broad consensus has emerged between the parties that in case a period of one and a half year is granted to the petitioner/tenant, to hand over vacant physical possession to the landlord, learned counsel for the petitioner will not press the present revision petition and the same be dismissed as such. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the time is required by the petitioner/tenant to shift to the alternative place. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has agreed that in case the petitioner will submit an undertaking before the Court of Rent Controller, Narnaul, that he will hand over peaceful vacant possession of the demised premises to the landlord and withdraw the present revision petition, such an indulgence may be granted to him. This Court is of the view that due sanctity ought to be granted to the broad consensus arrived at between learned counsel for the parties. Hence, delay in filing of the present revision petition is condoned and the same is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is granted a period of 18 months to vacate the demised premises, subject to his furnishing an undertaking before the Rent Controller, Narnaul that he will hand over peaceful vacant possession thereof on 1.2.2012 to the landlord. The undertaking will also state that the rent due for each following months shall be paid on or before 7th of each month. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge July 6, 2010 “DK”