1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6582 OF 2008 Revanappa s/o Sidhappa Gudda and another Petitioners Versus Gurappa s/o Vithoba Mali and another Respondents Mr.A.A.Mukhedkar, advocate for petitioners. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 17th November, 2009. P.C.: 1 A challenge is raised by original plaintiffs in this petition in respect of admissibility of the question put to Prosecution Witness No.4 while conducting cross examination by Counsel for defendants. The trial Court has permitted defendants to put the question. 2 It is made clear that the question asked by defendants be permitted and the answer shall also be recorded, however, objection raised by plaintiffs be considered at the time of disposal of the suit. Keeping the objection open for consideration, the trial Court shall proceed with the suit. 3 Considering interlocutory nature of the challenge, in exercise of writ jurisdiction conferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, no interference is warranted. Writ Petition is, therefore, rejected. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/wp658208