^h^-^c^y^^ .^^s^^ ^•••^%^^.-^ <:".,"W''V: ECT'^Sji ^wS.iS KitSff c ^ (>t6S''rf? \'-3-l ' i'.i'' • IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. Of2006 PETITIONER Smt. Fulwanti Lal W/o Shri S.C.B. Lal , aged about 44 years, occupation service, working as Head Mistress , posted at (3-overnment Middle School '^ Tanakhar, Tahsil Katghora District Korba (CG). j^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS .<-"• /'^^w^% {f ,.---~'-\ 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretaiy , School Education Department, Mantralay , D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). /^. The Secretaiy, Adim Jati and Anusuchit Jati, Vikas, Raipur , Tahsil and District Raipur (CG). 3. The Cominissioner, Scheduled Tribe and Scheduled Caste Development, D.K.S. Building Raipur (CG). /4. The Collector , (Tribal Develbpment), Korba, Tahsil and DistrictKorba (CG). / :J 10 10l^ IMR l^ IQ \^ lu 1?0 16 (o' IK ^ \w 1 15 IM 1^->\ ]a\^ l^? IIS3 1^1 IQ I'-q 1§ XI-HC-78 *11*<WI sh»frai 3^'qraRTO', »Tn'M'16, |s|dlUy ^..wc:.2^.r.^M. ^; 200 3iT^?r'Tgqi' (i{c<i^5)^sr) •W^T^TR-fi* craT3n^Tsh>iitt> ^ > ?T(iTWHf?(T3n^r ]<»ier oetitioher \e!pge Heard Shri Shaitendra Dubel/ Shri Sumesh BajaJ, 6ovt. on advance copy. By this petition, the petiti. 6-7-2006 whereby the petitio|i< Tcsnakhar, Podi Uproda to Simga, P^ The main ground of cha! compieted one year at the presei^ of the petitioner is workin9 in /Aany posts are iying vacouit ij pstitioner 'is a. !ow paid employee distance of 80 km and the sonsl Korba. Therefore, iearned counsej the petitioner mcy be a'lowed t^ respondent No.4 and he be dire^; learned counsel for respondents hj Having heard iesrned coun^ the facts and circumstances of th< opinion on the merits of the case for the petitioner is just, fa|r ', counse! for the petitioner. A^vocate for the State/respondents, wife-ifrr w^ft'ff te^t tfSTRK ^STl^ITSIT^T has questioned the order dated has been transferred from )di Uproda. is that the petitioner has not ^t place of posting and the husband •^ie same bepartment at Katghora. ji the nearby area, wherecs, the and she has been traisferred ct a of the petitioners are studying ct for 1+ie petitioner submitted that make a detailed representation to e|cted to decide 1+se same, to which (S no objection. |e! ~or 1+se pcrties, having regard to Ifse case, and without expressing cny the prayer made by leamed counsei and reasonGble. Therefor'e, the P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3:^';!nzncra', o-rfly'is, |sidiy^<. ? i^ *ii*i^rarqrai W[ 200 3TI^'?T4att> ('yi^'d^T) an^r^rf^ri^; (TOT 31^1 sbHicti Barve ^ 9:" g^TWHfersn^T ^2_> petitioner is allovi'ed to make a copy of this petition to respon^ent wit'nin c period of 10 dcys from shall dscide the representation o-f^ days from the date of receipt o1 manner, after corisiderin9 ail tii^ accordance with law. With the direction aforesaiip, Corssequenfly, M.(W.)P. No.^ Parties are entitled for cerl ^etailed representoflon aiong with a No.4 raising all her grievances todo.y and jn turn, respondent No.4 the petitioner within a period of 30 the representation, in an objective points raised by -i-he petitioner, in ^rafa^-r wTOt'ffteA ifSrerc ^iStf^ITSn^T i, the petition stands disposed of, '749/2006 aiso stands dispossci of. •ified copy of this order. Sd.f- L.C. Bhsaoo 3udge P.T.O. r