THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.1383 of 2008 Dated 19th April, 2011 Between: Smt.Valluru Madhavi and another …Petitioners And The Special Dy.Collector, International Airport, Shamshabad, Collectorate Complex, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: None appeared Counsel for respondents: GP for Land Acquisition The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in excluding the petitioners’ lands from the declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as illegal and arbitrary. In paras-4 and 7 of the counter affidavit filed by the Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), International Airport, Shamshabad, it is held as under: “…According to the sub-division record, the land belonging to the petitioners and also the other survey numbers were not coming under acquisition. Therefore, their lands have not been included in the draft declaration under Section 6 of the L.A.Act. Therefore the allegation of the petitioners that taking advantage of the situation, respondents wrongly concluded without following due procedure struck off from the list and ignored the petitioners interest is far from truth. In reply to para 8, it is to submit that an extent of 17.29 acres of land in Sy.Nos.38, 59, 60, 61, 72, 73, 74, 75, 291, 292, 294, 295, 299, 306, 307 and 208 in Mamidipally village, Saroornagar Mandal has been acquired and the petitioners land in Sy.No.297 of Mamidipally village has not been acquired. Therefore, causing of loss and hardship to the petitioners does not arise.” No reply affidavit is filed controverting the above averments contained in the counter affidavit. In the light of the stand taken in the counter affidavit to the effect that the petitioners’ lands are deleted from acquisition, no relief in this writ petition can be granted in their favour. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, the interim order, dated 24.09.2008, granted by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.1650 of 2008, shall stand vacated and W.P.M.P.Nos.1649, 1650, 22395, 25223 and 25895 of 2008 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 19th April, 2011 VGB