IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 592 of 2006 (M/B) Bhusan Lal Sachedeva s/o Gulsan Kumar Sechdeva, R/o Sai Galli, Bhupatwala, Haridwar …………. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, 2. Senior Superintendent of Police, Distt. Haridwar. 3. Station House Officer, P.S. Haridwar 4. Sri Ram Ratan s/o Harnam Singh (Seespal) r/o (river) Naher Colony, Near Singh Dwar, Room No.1/3, Haridwar ………….. Respondents Sri M.K. Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri D.K. Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents 1 to 3. None for respondent no.4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Sri M.K. Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri D.K. Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents 1 to 3. None for respondent no.4. 2. Sri Sharma, the learned Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner Bhusan Lal Sachedeva seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him now has become infructuous as the police after the completion of the investigation has filed charge-sheet against the petitioner before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, CLMA No. 5891 of 2006 also stands disposed of . (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 12.07.2006 12.07.2006 A