CW-7676/09 (1) In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7676/2009 Suresh Kumar Vs. Raj. Public Service Commission & Ors Date Of Order :: 01/12/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Kuldeep Aswal, for petitioner. Mr. S.N. Kumawat, AAG, for respondent. It has not been disputed by respondent's counsel as well that the controversy raised in the instant petition has been decided by the coordinate bench in bunch of petitions (CWP-8023/2009-Mangla Ram Bishnoi & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors and other connected writ petitions) on 30.06.2010 and it has been observed as under :- “In the result, the writ petitions succeed, the same are hereby allowed. The action of the respondents in denying 36 candidates belonging to OBC category, the selection and appointment on the posts against unreserved seats in general/open category on the ground that they have availed the benefit of relaxation of age meant for OBC category is declared illegal and CW-7676/09 (2) unconstitutional. The respondents are directed to consider the candidature of the petitioners afresh and if after reshuffling the merits by inclusion of names of those 36 candidates selected in OBC category in the list of open/general category, the petitioners are found entitled to be appointed as per their merit in the OBC category then, they shall be provided appointment on the posts of Sub Inspector Police (AP); Platoon Commander (Sub Inspector RAC) or Sub Inspector Police (MBC), as the case may be with effect from the date the last candidate in the OBC category or in the absence thereof in general category was appointed. The petitioners shall be entitled to notional benefits for intervening period including the benefits of seniority, increment etc. The entire exercise for providing appointments to the petitioners, if they are found entitled to be appointed shall be completed expeditiously in any case, within a period of three months from the date of this order. No order as to CW-7676/09 (3) costs.” In the light of the judgment referred to supra, present writ petition stands disposed of and the petitioner will also be entitled for the same relief which has been granted by this Court in the judgment referred to supra. (Ajay Rastogi),J. VS Shekhawat/-p.3 7676cw09Dec01FnlDsps.doc