IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19627 of 2011 Rama Shanker Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 4. 24.10.2011 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Considering the nature of allegation under Section 436 of the Penal Code, Section 3(1)(X) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, the impugned order from the case diary confirming the fire at the place of occurrence, the defence of a land dispute, does not persuade the Court to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail when co-accused has already been enlarged on regular bail. This application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. Snkumar/ (Navin Sinha,J.)