IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14668 of 2006 PRATIBHA CHOUDHARY & ORS Versus B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY & ORS With CWJC No.14634 of 2006 SANDEEP KUMAR & ORS Versus B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- 04/ 24.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. It appears that BAMS examination(2003) of Ist, 2nd and 3rd (supplementary) was held in 2006. It is alleged that answer sheet was sent to Lukhnow for evaluation and evaluation was made and tabulation was prepared by the University. However, result was not published and answer sheet was sent for re-evaluation to Haridwar. After receiving marks allotted to the candidates, tabulation was prepared and result was published by the University. That result was cancelled on the orders of the Chancellor and on his orders again re- evaluation was made at Nalanda Open University and result was published. In the - 2 - published result petitioners of both the writ applications failed. I am not inclined to interfere with the re-evaluation made by the Nalanda Open University as the same was made on the specific orders of the Chancellor. It would be appropriate to the petitioners to raise their grievances before the Chancellor, if they are not satisfied with the result published by the Nalanda Open University. With the above observations/ directions this writ application is disposed of. ( J. N. Singh, J. ) A.H.