IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9360 of 2009 BIRENDRA PRASAD YADAV, SON OF SRI SATYANARAYAN YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAMPALLI, P.S. LUKHI, DISTRICT MADHUBANI AT PRESENT JUNIOR SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE AT KHAGAUL POLICE STATION, DISTRICT PATNA----PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH HOME SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETRIAT, PATNA. 3. THE A.D.G.P.(HEAD QUARTER) GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PATNA ZONE, PATNA. 5. THE DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CENTRAL ZONE, MUZAFFARPUR. 6. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NAWADAH. 7. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATNA-----RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02. 07.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioner is holding the post of Junior Sub-Inspector of Police and was subjected to inter-district transfer so as to facilitate the last parliamentary elections. Before his transfer he had not completed six year term in the District from where he was transferred in the light of the provisions contained in Section 10 of the Bihar Police Act, 2007. Petitioner being an obedient Government servant joined the transferred post and having joined the transferred post he has filed this writ case seeking direction to the authorities to re-consider the matter and to allow him to continue within the same District for remainder of the term in the light of the provisions contained in Section 10 of the Bihar Police Act, 2007. 3. As the petitioner has already joined the transferred post it is deemed expedient to grant him liberty to represent before the competent authority highlighting the ground raised in this application that the transfer order is contrary to the provisions contained in Section 10 of the Bihar Police Act, 2007 and if the authorities are satisfied that the transfer order has been issued ignoring the provisions contained in Section 10 of the Bihar Police Act, 2007 then appropriate orders in accordance with law be passed as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt of the representation. 4. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.) - 2 -