IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 9446 of 2008. Decided on 17th December, 2010. Des Raj and another. …Petitioners. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. B.N. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): It is not disputed that the case of the petitioners can be considered in view of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in Gauri Dutt & Ors. Versus State of H.P., Latest HLJ 2008 (HP) 366. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioners as per the principles laid down in the judgment, quoted hereinabove after seeking options from them, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioners. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 17, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - - 3 -