IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12908 of 2010 1. RAM CHANDRA MANDAL S/O LATE JUGESHWAR MANDAL R/O VILL.- BHAGWAN DAS, P.S.- TOWN DARBHANGA, DISTT.- DARBHANGA Versus 1. RAKESH PRASAD @ RAKESH KUMAR S/O LATE RAMESHWAR PRASAD R/O VILL.- SAHEBGANJ, P.S.- SAHEBGANJ, DISTT.- CHHAPRA, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT KATKI BAZAR, P.S.- DARBHANGA TOWN, DISTT.- DARBHANGA 2. RAJU PRASAD @ RAJEEV KUMAR S/O LATE RAMESHWAR PRASAD R/O VILL.- SAHEBGANJ, P.S.- SAHEBGANJ, DISTT.- CHHAPRA, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT KATKI BAZAR, P.S.- DARBHANGA TOWN, DISTT.- DARBHANGA 3. BHOLU PRASAD @ RAHUL KUMAR S/O LATE RAMESHWAR PRASAD R/O VILL.- SAHEBGANJ, P.S.- SAHEBGANJ, DISTT.- CHHAPRA, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT KATKI BAZAR, P.S.- DARBHANGA TOWN, DISTT.- DARBHANGA 4. NANHE PRASAD @ RAMENDRA KUMAR S/O LATE RAMESHWAR PRASAD R/O VILL.- SAHEBGANJ, P.S.- SAHEBGANJ, DISTT.- CHHAPRA, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT KATKI BAZAR, P.S.- DARBHANGA TOWN, DISTT.- DARBHANGA 5. MEENU KUMARI D/O LATE RAMESHWAR PRASAD R/O VILL.- SAHEBGANJ, P.S.- SAHEBGANJ, DISTT.- CHHAPRA, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT KATKI BAZAR, P.S.- DARBHANGA TOWN, DISTT.- DARBHANGA 6. RAGINI KUMARI D/O LATE RAMESHWAR PRASAD R/O VILL.- SAHEBGANJ, P.S. SAHEBGANJ, DISTT.- CHHAPRA 7. BAIDH NATH KHANDELWAL PATWA S/O SATYA NARAYAN PRASAD CLAIMING TO BE DUTTAK PUTRA OF THE LATE DWARANI DEVI AND LATE BISHO LAL KHANDELWAL, R/O VILL.- SAHEBGANJ, P.S. SAHEBGANJ, DISTT.- CHAPRA, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT KATKI BAZAR, P.S.- DARBHANGA TOWN, DISTT.- DARBHANGA ----------- 9/ 06/01/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and for the respondent No.7 who appears in person. Respondent No.7 has opposed any prayer for allowing repairs to the premises in question as sought on behalf of the petitioner. Having heard learned counsel for the parties the Court is satisfied that there is no occasion for the Court to delve into the question whether the repairs should be allowed or not. On perusal of the order dated 12.9.2009 this Court is satisfied that the trial court has abdicated its jurisdiction to decide on merits whether to allow or disallow the petitioner for repairs of the - 2 - premises in question. If a Court is seized of a litigation with regard to A property, all issues arising with regard to that property are to be raised and decided before that court itself and there cannot be separate proceedings before different forums with regard to the same suit property and claims which are integrally connected with the claims in the suit. The order dated 12.6.2009 is accordingly set aside. The matter is remanded to the trial court to hear the parties afresh and pass an appropriate reasoned and speaking order on the petition of the petitioner stated to have been filed on 15.9.2007. The writ application is allowed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)