( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.19 OF 2008 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.19 OF 2008 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.19 OF 2008 Jaykumar Sattappa Madnaik .. Applicant. Versus Aamgonda Devgonda Patil & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Manoj A. Patil for the applicant. Ms.Pratiksha Mohite i/b.Pratap Patil & A.J.Chougule for respondent No.1. Mr.H.J.Dedhia, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 6th June, 2008. DATED : 6th June, 2008. DATED : 6th June, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Mr.Manoj Patil for the applicant. Ms.Pratiksha Mohite for respondent No.1. Mr.H.J.Dedhia, learned A.P.P. for respondent - State. 2. This application is filed for seeking condonation of delay of 23 days in filing the revision. 3. Heard learned Advocates appearing on both the ( 2 ) sides. An acceptable explanation is given in paragraph 3 of the application. It appears that the applicant was taken to a situation where he was told that there is no point in filing any revision. However, at a later point of time, upon getting himself enlightened at the hands of yet another Advocate, he was advised to file a revision. This situation may happen in the life of a common man and the delay has occurred because of a dilemma which the present applicant had faced. The reasons given for condonation of delay are acceptable. The application for condonation of delay is required to be granted. Hence, the order :- a) Application is granted. Delay is condoned. b) Post the revision for admission on 24.6.2008. 4. Application for restoration stands disposed off accordingly. (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)