IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16475 of 2010 1. RAVINDRA SINGH 2. Sintu Singh …………. Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 18.05.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. Learned Counsel submits that the FIR lodged by the Dafadar under Sections 302 and other provisions of the Penal Code is against unknown. The only material against the petitioners is suspicion. Learned Counsel for the State from the impugned order of rejection after consideration of materials in the case diary is unable to point out the substantive grounds for suspicion of involvement of the petitioners in the assault so as to deny them the privilege of bail. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Siwan in Mahrajganj PS Case No. 99 of 2009. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)