.^ Ct r^\ c' r IM THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASNJR(CHHATTISG4RH) WRTTI WHO. ^S<c./2004 PETmONER Tes Ram Sahu S/o. Sri B.R.Sahu :.« /^ed about 57 yeans ^^^:"^^^ R/o. Vill. Maddi/ P.0. Madelj, ^^?^^' VERSl^ Via Kurud, tah- Kurud, Dist-Ohamtari ^:> '^'" RESPONDENTS 1) The stafce ofChhattisgarti Through tfie sec.reSsry, Education Depariinent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur C.G 2) Distncfc Education officer, Dhamtan District Dhamtari, C.6. PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF TtiE CONSTHUnON OF INDIA R3R ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRTTS. DIRECnONS AND/OR ORDERS XI-HC-22 3T[^T^T f<rlJ5h 3T||RT 5b*l|cb ^l^a Jl' ^ ^ 's^f ^wn^ra, ^^4<<o, fa<rt .(^ HI+1Crtl ^H1<^> 3TT^T X(^? W.^Ro. X^^G^^'t, "^ 200 •^^T' 3?TT^T'^RITW^ftn 27-8-2004 On a mention being made, this case is t^ken up Petitioner/sbyShri ^. C. VeHh^a. State by Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adi and Shri Akhil Agrawal and Shn Sandeep Dubey Heard. The matter relates to transfer ofthe petit Counsel for the petitioner/s subinitte< Having heard and considered the rival c cbl^i<rt4lT1 ^H<rff ^'feTst <F3i^i< ^ 3?rf^TH 3TT^T ^^Q<B^&b. rocate GeneraL, ^dfh Slm Satish Gupta, D^'r.G.A., PanelLawyers. loner jfrom the respective place. that the traiisfer of the petitioner/s has been efFected fflegaUy in contrayention oflaw and polij^y. State counsel opposed it. State counsel submitted that the petiti|oner/s has straightway ffled fhe petition ^dthout serving notice for dem.and ofjustice and represerjtation. 'nteiitions, without expressmg any opinioii on the merits ofthe case, in the opinion.oftihis Court, sjnds ofjustice wiU be served ifa directkaa is given to the peftioner/s to make detailed representati{)n raising his/herjgrievancesand groimds before tlic Siste Govcif-i.L^^iVCOi^^^^j^t. u.Liu.iuiiTy oi ui^ this order, within 10 days, and ori Govemment/competent authority ofthe respond^nts, under tlie law, shall consider and decide tlie same <^n its own m.erits m accordance with law| liom the date of receipVproducuon of the repjreseniation. If any contraveiition of polic> giiidelines is brought to the notiee, the same be c(j Counsel for the petitioner/s prays tha] gnevance of the petitioner/s remauis, he/she m^ the law. It is open to the petitioner to avaii. the renj Witti the aforesaid observations, tbis petj Consequently M.W.P., ifany, also stand^ disposed of. Cerdfied copy as per mles. Copy to State counsel for comphance. ^ ^^I^/^ ^ icspuitdc^^ :1—£; T?r-<+^ " /""py offht? netition and uch representation being filed, the State as early as possible preferably ^dtfun SLX weeks ^nsidered on its own ments. after the decision of the representation if any y be allovved to avail tlie remedy available mider ledy avaUable under the law. [don staiids disposed of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [1^ ^m^.