IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1877 of 2010 Date of decision:19.03.2010. Hardip Singh ...Petitioner Versus Parveen Kumar and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. H.S.Saggu, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The interim orders, presented today in the Court by the learned counsel for the petitioner, are taken on record. A conjunctive perusal of the above interim orders and the affidavit – supported averments made in the course of the petition are indicative of the fact that the relevant ejectment action is not proceeding at the expected pace inspite of the fact that the plea for ejectment had been raised on an averment of personal necessity. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be content and the interests of justice will be served if a direction is issued to the learned Rent Controller to dispose of the ejectment petition within a time found frame. The matter is presently listed before the learned Rent Controller for 28.04.2010 for recording of the evidence of the petitioner. In the light thereof, the petition is disposed of with a direction that the learned Rent Controller shall dispose of the ejectment petition filed by the petitioner within a period of six months from 28.04.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner shall conclude his evidence on 28.04.2010 itself. The defendants shall also have the equal number of opportunities to conclude their evidence. Disposed of accordingly. March 19, 2010 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE