IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8345 of 2003 LAL MOHAR GIRI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR . with CWJC No.8346 of 2003 ARBIND KUMAR SINGH . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR . ----------- 4. 25.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The allegation in the impugned order that they had obtained loans in a fraudulent manner on the basis of forged and fabricated document has not been denied in the writ petition. The Court was therefore inclined to dismiss the writ application. However, learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon a similar order of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 2747 of 2003 in which noticing the undertaking for deduction of the loan amount directly from salary month to month, the impugned order of the present nature were set aside. Judicial propriety demands that this writ petition be disposed off in similar terms as in C.W.J.C. No. 2747 of 2003. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)