IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 383 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Anil Bhandari s/o Dalip Singh Bhandari 2. Smt. Jamuna Devi w/o Dalip Singh Bhandari 3. Dalip Singh Bhandari s/o Sri Narain Singh Bhandari 4. Sudha Bhandari w/o Sri Sunil Bhandari All r/o 8-2269/19/585 Indira Nagar, Road No.2 Banjar Hills, Hyderabad (Andhra Pradesh) ……. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Senior Superintendent of Police, Dehradun. 2. Station House Officer, Police Station, Basant Vihar, Dehradun 3. Smt. Sarita Bhandari w/o Sri Anil Bhandari, d/o Sri Vikram Singh Rana, presently r/o New Indira Nagar, P.S. Basant Vihar, Dehradun ……. Respondents ………….. Sri D. S. Mehta, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for the respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Sri D. S. Mehta, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri. H.C. Pande, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents 1 and 2 None for respondent no. 3. 2. Sri Pande, the learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners Anil Bhandari, Smt. Jamuna Devi, Dalip Singh Bhandari and Sudha Bhandari seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them now has become infructuous as the police after the completion of the investigation has filed charge-sheet against the petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 4, namely, Anil Bhandari, Smt. Jamuna Devi and Sudha Bhandari before the concerning Court and no case worth filing charge-sheet was found against petitioner no. 3 Dalip Singh Bhandari. 2. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 05.04.2006 stands vacated automatically. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 05.07.2006 05.07.2006 A