IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 19TH JUNE 2008 / 29TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 16838 of 2008(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- RAJEEV.P.L..S/O.LAKSHMANAN, PLAKIKATTKUZHIYIL,EDAVARAMBU PO, CHERUPUZHA, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.AMARESAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER,ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, SREEKANDAPURAM PO., SREEKANDAPURAM. 2. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KSEB, PADYOTTUCHAL. BY ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B FOR R1-2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No. 16838 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 19th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT Case of the petitioner is that the petitioner made an application for electric connection and that was not being acted upon. Petitioner sent lawyer's notice as Ext.P2. According to the petitioner, no action is being taken on the application for connection. 2. Heard counsel for the respondents. Counsel for the respondents on instructions from the second respondent submits that no such application is seen filed. 3. I feel that the matter should be looked into by the first respondent. Ext.P2 should be treated as a representation in that behalf and the first respondent will consider and take a decision on Ext.P2 after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. If it is found that the application is filed by the petitioner as submitted by the petitioner, and due amount has been remitted by the petitioner, petitioner will be given electric connection as per law at the earliest. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb