IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20926 of 2009 MD.JAWED Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.23844 of 2009 SAH NOREN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 24.08.2009 Heard. The case is under sections 457, 380 and 411 of IPC. Two petitioners of the two petitions are in custody from different dates. As regards petitioner Sah Noren, there is no recovery of any of the theft properties of the case in hand, rather his confession indicated that some of the watches which were found in possession of the petitioner were theft properties of other theft case. There is no instance of such cases. As regards petitioner Md. Jawed, he admittedly holds a mobile shop as may appear from the seizure memo. He has denied recovered SIM to be the theft property. In the circumstances, let petitioners Md. Jawed and Sah Noren of the two petitions be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.2000/(two thousand)each with one surety of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Kishanganj in Kochadhaman P.S. Case no. 48 of 2009. Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)