IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20745 of 2011 Anil Kumar Gupta s/o Shiv Nandan Gupta, r/o village-Sakalpara, P.S. & District- Madhepura. --Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar --Opp.Party 2 18.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is one of the named accused in this Complaint Case with allegation of being middle man on whose persuation the complainant made payment of rupees three thousand to co-accused for allotment of benefits under Indira Awas Scheme which was never made to him rather on demand he was absused. In view of above and the case squarely covered by the case of Jorgia Pentia Vrs. State of A.P.; 2009 (1) BCCR 153 (SC), the petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks of communication of the order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Manjur Alam, Judicial Magistrate, first class, Madhepura, in Complaint Case no. 713 (C) of 2009, subject to the 2 conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present before the court below on each and every date for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. AAhmad ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)