IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 OP (FC).No. 3784 of 2011(R) ----------------------------------------------- OP.1435/2011 of FAMILY COURT,KOLLAM .................... PETITIONER ------------------ MUHAMMED HAREES, S/O.MUHAMMED KUNJU, PULATHARAKIZHAKKATHIL, MAVELI, PANMANA P.O., CHAVARA, 691583. BY ADV. SRI.SUBHASH CYRIAC RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ SAKKEENA, KOCHUVEETTIL, PULI NORTH, THAZHAVA P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK - 690518. BY ADVOCATE SHRI SUNIL V. MOHAMMED. THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN O.P.(FC).NO.3784 OF 2011 R PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF ORIGINAL PETITION 1435/11 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF I.A.3591/11 IN OP.1435/11 OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM. EXT.P3 TRUE TYPED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 14.11.11 IN I.A.NO.3591/11 IN OP.1435/11 OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION AND MEDICAL CERTIFICATE SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM. EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE I.A.3726/11 IN OP.1435/11 OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM. EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE I.A.NO.3727/11 IN OP.1435/11 OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. // TRUE COPY// PS TO JUDGE K.M. JOSEPH & A. M. SHAFFIQUE, JJ. ----------------------------------------- O.P.(FC).NO. 3784 OF 2011 R ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 23rd November, 2011 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. The prayers sought for in the Original Petition are as follows: “i) Direct the Family Court, Kollam to dispose of Exts.P6 and P7 before 24.11.11. ii) Direct the respondent to hand over the custody of the petitioner's son, Muhammed Haadi to the petitioner for one day before 25.11.11”. 2. We heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. Pursuant to a suggestion made by us as to whether the respondent has any objection in permitting the petitioner to see the minor child, counsel for the respondent would fairly submit that the respondent has no objection in permitting the petitioner to see the minor child in the office of Advocate Shri Shaji P. Azeez, Kollam. He submits that the respondent will bring the child to the office of the OP(FC).NO.3784/2011 R 2 Advocate mentioned, at 10 AM. on 24.11.2011 and that the petitioner can go and see the minor child in the office of the Advocate from 10 AM to 10/30 AM. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will go and see the child between 10 AM and 10/30 AM on 24.11.2011. We record the said submission. We further make it clear that the petitioner will not be permitted to take the minor child outside and the arrangement is that the petitioner can go and see the child as aforesaid in the Office of the Advocate and the petitioner alone is permitted to see the child as aforesaid. The Original Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= A. M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE kbk. //True Copy// PS to Judge OP(FC).NO.3784/2011 R 3