j.-S*-B»2, Petitioners: Respondents- HIGH^Q^LRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP (C)No.3665/2010 1. Rupa Bai W/o Late Adhari aged 46 years 2. Smt. Punai W/o Late Girdhari aged about 38 years 3. Fulwasan W/o Late Punaram aged 33 years 4. Mand Singh Dhruv S/o Late Ram Gond aged 37 years 5. Ganesh Ram Sahu S/o Late Daya Rain Sahu aged 42 years 6. Chbkha Lal Sahu S/o Late Daya Ram Sahu aged 39 years 7. Anand Ram Sahu S/o Late Daya Ram Sahu aged 52 years 8. ' Tikam Ram S/o Late Tula Ram Sahu.k aged Late 56 years 9. Jivan Ram Sahu S/o Dukh Ram Sahu aged 48 years 10. Uday Ram S/o Dukh Ram Sahu aged 39 years 11. Ram Kishan Sahu S/o Dukh Ram Sahu aged 51 years 12: Khanyiahlal Sahu S/o Dukh Ram Sahu aged 49 years 13. Uman Lal Sahu S/o Dukh Ram Sahu aged 34 years 14. Dhanprasad Sahu S/o DukhRam Sahu aged 38 years 15. Ramaswaroop Sahu S/o Shiv Prasad Sahu aged 41 years 16. Murali Sahu S/o Shiv Prasad Sahu aged 45 years 17. Prem Sahu S/o Shiv Prasad Sahv aged 37 years 18. Bhanu Prasad Sahu S/o Shiv Prasad Sahu aged 42 years 19. Bhudan Gond aged 39 years 20. Birchhu Ram Gond aged 34 years 21. Smt. Puspa Bai aged 50 years. All R/o Village Datranga 119. Raipur, Tahsil. Raipur Dist, CG State. Versus 1. State of C.G. Through: Commissioner (Land Records) Raipur, Raipur Dist, CG State. 2. The District Collector, Raipur, Raipur Dist, CG State. 3. Tahsildar, Raipur, Raipur Dist, CG State. J (y^. 2- s1!?^'%^^ '. g 'r-SS'li-.-^ '^.^F1" '-Sa'tBaiiii-1" WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Hon'bIe Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri K.R. Nair, Advocate with Shri Dilman Rathi Minj, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Rakesh Jha, Dy. G.A. for the State. / '7 •' !/'• ORAL- ORDER (Passedon 22/07/2010) Heard. Order impugned dated 9/3/2010 passed by Board of Revenue directing Superintendent Land Record, Raipur for taking suitable action perused. Petition and its Annexures reveals that no attempt has been inade by the petitioners for initiation of the proceeding before the Commissioner Land Record, I do not find any case for issuance of direction in terms of under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, this petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge