IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10268 of 1996 Anadi Kumar Singh son of late N. R. Singh, resident of Village, P.O. & P.S. Karogram, District- Deoghar, at present Store Assistant, Headquarter, Store and Purchase, Bihar State Electricity Board, Bailey Road, Patna( since dismissed). ----Petitioner. -Versus- 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board, through its Chairman, Bidhyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Bidhyut Bhawan Bailey Road, Patna. 3. The Director of Personnel, Bihar State Electricity Board, Bidhyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 4. The Joint Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Bidhyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 5. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Store and Purchase, Bihar State Electricity Board, Bidhyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 6. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Store and Purchase, Bihar State Electricity Board, Bidhyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. -----Respondents. ------- For the petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Roy, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Advocate. ------- 8. 18.11.2008. The petitioner was Store Assistant working in the Bihar State Electricity Board alongwith one Sri Brijnandan Lal Barnwal, was dismissed from service after a departmental enquiry. Sri Brijnandan Lal Barnwal came to this court and filed a writ bearing C.W.J.C.No.10493 of 1996. This Court quashed the order of punishment. The order passed in C.W.J.C.No.10493 of 1996 was challenged by the Bihar State Electricity Board by filing a Letters Patent Appeal numbered as L.P.A.No.1356 of 1998. While disposing of the L. P. A. the Court held that the order passed by the Learned Single Judge was justified. The only amendment or addition to the order passed by the Learned Single Judge is that the L.P.A. Bench directed that the petitioner’s claim - 2 - ought to have remitted back to the Disciplinary Authority to pass fresh order ignoring that part of the second show cause notice which proposed punishment of dismissal and recovery of loss of Rs. 11125722/-. The Division Bench has thus set aside the order passed in appeal and has quashed the punishment order and remitted the matter back to the Disciplinary Authority seeking direction to pass final orders ignoring that part of second show cause notice which proposed punishment of dismissal and for recovery of loss of Rs. 11125722/-. Likewise this Court also remits the matter back to the Disciplinary Authority to the extent to which it has been remitted back by the order passed in L. P.A.No.1356 of 1998. The Disciplinary Authority should complete the proceedings within a period of two months on receipt/ production of the order. This writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid directions. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)