1 APPA.363-2011 acd FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 363 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APEAL (ST) NO. 177 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memorandum Court’s or Judge’s Orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ms. N.S.K. Aubi, for the applicant. Mr. S.A. Shaikh, APP for the State. --- CORAM: U.D. SALVI, J. APRIL 18, 2011. P.C. Heard. Perused the application. At the outset, Mr. Shaikh, the learned APP for the State submits that the extent of delay quoted in the application is incorrect, in as much as office has calculated period of delay as 2 years and 73 days. According to the applicant-accused his incarceration in jail following his conviction under Section 392 read with Section 398 of IPC, 1860 and under Section 3 read with Section 25(1)(B)(a) of the Arms Act made his financial condition critical, and therefore, 2 APPA.363-2011 there was nobody to look after his interest. The cause for delay pleaded in the application would justify the delay caused irrespective of its extent as breakdown of financial condition due to incarceration can be looked as a natural consequence and needs no further corroboration. Delay is condoned. Affidavit in support of the applicant is dispensed with. Criminal Application stands disposed off. (U. D. SALVI,J.)