@ HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH :BILASPUR Sushil Kumar Mahobiya aged about at 42 year’s son of Bahoran Ial‘ Mahobiya ‘Resident at Telipara DIVISION BENCH CORAM __ HON’BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ. HON’BLE SHRI D.R. DESHMUKH, J. Misc. Appeal No. 1330 of 2004 APPELLANTS: 1. Balram Prasad Soni aged about 55 APPLICANTS] year's Son of Bhure Ial soni E:LA‘iMANTs 2. Smt. Premlata Soni wife of Balram , Prasad aged about 52 year’s i 3. Manish Soni aged about 33 year’s Son of Balram Soni ‘ 4. Harish soni aged about 23 year's Son of Balram Soni I [ 5. Satish Soni aged about 24 year‘s 11 I Son of Balram Soni i 1 6, Rupesh Soni aged about 17 year’s f Son of Balram Soni 7. Ku. Seema Soni aged about 25 year'S'Daughter of Balram Soni 8. Ku. Poonam@ Annapurna Soni aged about 15 year‘s Daughter of 1‘ Balram Soni Appellant‘s No. 6 and 8 are minors i hence through their father the appellant No. 1, and AII the appellants are residing at Goandpara Near Sai-Mandir, 40- Biiapur, Tehsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) i Versus RESPONDENTS: 1. Avinash Kumar Shukla aged about NON-APPLICANTS a 32 year’s, the Driver Son of Jeevan em Ial Shukla. Resident of Seepat Chowk Sarkanda, Tehsil and District BilaSpur. Bilasur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. National Insurance Company, Through its Branch Manager, infront of P.G.B.T. College, Tarbahar Naka, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. The Oriental Insurance Company, through its Branch Manager, Near to P.G.B.T. College Biiaspur (C.G.) P‘rese‘nt i ‘t : None for the agpellants. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 25‘“ July 2006) i The following oral order of the Court was passed by 31R. Nayak, CJ. When the appeal was called out for motion hearing, none appeared nor any representation was made on behalf of the appellants. In the circumstance, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. // l ; sd/— sdl. Chie Justc / i f ie;