IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4285 of 2008 Date of Decision: August 31, 2009 Lakhwinder Kaur .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. G.S. Bal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. None for respondent No.4. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent-State contends that the name of the petitioner was recommended for the post of Art & Crafts Teacher as per the original record. Somehow the petitioner came to be appointed as Sewing Teacher. Learned counsel further contends that without doubt, four enquiries have already been conducted into the conduct of CWP No.4285 of 2008 [2] the petitioner, however, the petitioner has been exonerated. Even uptil the level of Home Secretary, this fact has been noticed. Learned counsel for the respondents, however, states that it is the case of the respondents that the petitioner is not eligible to be appointed as Art & Crafts Teacher. The petitioner has the qualification for being appointed as a Sewing Teacher, however, name of the petitioner for appointment as Sewing Teacher was not considered. The facts are such that they warrant an enquiry by the Vigilance Department which has already been ordered and is under way. The petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to conclude the enquiry proceedings, without any harassment to the petitioner in view of the fact that earlier the conduct of the petitioner has been enquired into. It is further directed that the enquiry reports earlier submitted by the various authorities would also be considered by the Enquiry Officer appointed by the Vigilance Department. CWP No.4285 of 2008 [3] In case the petitioner is aggrieved by any adverse order passed subsequently, the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the same. (AJAI LAMBA) August 31, 2009 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?