IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos. 6267 to 6270 of 2011. Date of Decision : August 9, 2011 1. CWP No. 6267 of 2011 Yashpal Sharma versus State of H.P. and others. 2. CWP No. 6268 of 2011 Chander Singh versus State of H.P. and others. 3. CWP No. 6269 of 2011 Bhisham Singh versus State of H.P. and others. 4. CWP No. 6270 of 2011 Sarveshwar Dutt versus State of H.P. and others. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner(s): Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). For the respondents: Mr. R. K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for the respondents-State. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim the benefit of ad-hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgments of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, titled as Sita Ram vs. State of H.P. Therefore, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take 2 appropriate action within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, along with their representation(s) and a copy of the writ petition as well as a copy of the judgment referred to above, by the petitioner. 2. These writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. August 9, 2011 (PK/hl)