W v.9' I WRIT PETITION no.3‘365 oy- 2003 v" A PETITIWER The State of dahattisgazh. ‘Ihrough the Secretary Departmaxt of Co-operative Societies, Mantralay, D.K.S.Blilding, Raipur (0G) qhe Registrar: Oo-operative $ocieties, dmhattisgarh, Raipur ,Tehsil ané District Raipur (CG). ‘Ihe mputy Rwistrar, Comparative societies, North Bastar, Kanker, District Kanker (CG) . $1ri Vimdra mmar Tiwari, Fishery Officer, Pankhajocr/ Administrator Jal Jeevan Matsyaudwg Sahakari san iti, Pankhajur, District Kanker. vimal Samaddar s/o Shri Nimal samaddar, cccupation wishezman,Matsya Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, PVmNo.55 Fankhajur District Kanker (CG). RESPONDENTS M WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDTA IN THE HIGH CWRT OF JUDICA'I’URE AT BILASFUR (CG) U£Pa1 Das S/o ant-i Madhusudan Das. aged about 38 years, President of Jal Jeevan Matsyaudyag Sahakari Saniti, P.V. No.55, Pankhajoor, District Kanker (CG). [ Petitioner by Smt. Rein Kocher, Advocate. Shri Ranbir Singh, Govt. Advocate takes notice on behalf of Respondents No. 1, 2 and 3. The petitioner has preferred this #peu'tion under Amcle 226,1 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the order datcdv29.10.2003 passed by the Respondent No.2 Joint Regietrar whereby the application of ithe petitioner for grant of stay of tho impugned ottler dated 1.10.2003 passed by the Respondent No.3 has been rejected on the gnound that the exparte stay cannot be granted. The petitioner preferred ény appeal before the Respondent No.2 against the order dt. 1.10.2003 and that appeal is still pending. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that if learned Joint Registrar was of the opinion that eX-parte stay cannot be granted men‘he should have issued notice on the stay application instead of rejecting the same. Raving heaxd learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circmmstances of the case the Respondent XLHc-22 ' @ WW,WE,W$ 3W m mmwggGS‘ b m E I mm mam ‘ mmm ' ’ m£§qm awm 13.02.2004 ’ XI—HC-22 L “’— No.2 Joint Reisar is dinicte gtr OSsible pfebl Within a I p reray r6ceipt of copy of is ordex th ord€rs on tha stay plicati ap accordane with law. Howevet c handove ths charg€ 11‘11 the c y thc Jnt 1%gitraI; With h: abovc observations t' Partigs aie entitl for c ed WW§§Q§W éa‘wm Jis petition is disposed of fmally. ertified copy of this order. 1 to decide the appeal itself as early as )eriod of two months from the date of , and in the meantime he may pass 3n after hearing both‘the parties in i the petitioner should not be forced to mier of the stay application is passed Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge [slew r b oi S 1 r gt ,