FARAD CONTINUTION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Contempt petn No. 379 of 2005 -------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office Court or Judge’s Order Memorandum of Coram appearence,Court’s Orders & Directions and Registrar’s Order --------------------------------------------------- Mr.D B Sawant for petitioner Mr N P Deshpande for respondent nos.l and 2 Mr D A Patil AGP for State CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. DATED l3.4.2006 DATED l3.4.2006 DATED l3.4.2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The only direction that is given in the order dated 20.l2.2004 is to supply copy of the order dated 29.8.2004 passed in revision application within two weeks. The explanation offered in the reply affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no. 2 is that the earlier order dated 29.8.2004 has been recalled by the authority and which matter was taken in issue in writ petition no. 2333 of 2005 decided subsequently on l3.9.2005. Viewed in this perspective the question of proceeding for initiating contempt action for alleged non supply of the copy of the said order of 29.8.2004 does not exist. Hence this petition is disposed of. Notice issued to the respondent no. 2 stands discharged. If the petitioner has any grievance about the subsequent order it will be open to him to take recourse to the remedy as may be permissible in law, but surely cannot be made basis for initiating contempt action.