IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3156 of 2011. Date of Decision : May 10, 2011 Sushma Devi … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others … Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 3. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure P-3, order of transfer. We are informed that the petitioner has already been relieved, though in absentia. The petitioner has several grievances as well. All these aspects, the petitioner may point out before the second respondent, by way of a representation pointing out also the vacancies, if any, available in the nearby stations. The second respondent shall also look into the representation and pass appropriate orders thereon within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation by the petitioner. Petitioner may not be compelled to join the transferred station till the decision, 2 as above, is taken by the second respondent and it will be open for the petitioner to avail the leave of kind due. 2. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. May 10, 2011 (PK/Pankaj)