BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Ninth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S. TAMILVANAN CRL OP(MD) No.16012 of 2011 1. KANDAVELU 2. MURUGAN 3. SELLAMMAL 4. MURUGESWARI 5. SAKUNTHALA 6. MUTHULAKSHMI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 to 5 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RAMANATHAPURAM BAZZAR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DT, CR NO. 519/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.SUNDAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 2. The petitioners who are arrayed as accused facing charges for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime NO.519 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, have come forward with this application, seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have not threatened the de-facto complainant with dire consequences and attacked him with deadly weapons as stated by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and a false case has been foisted against them and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail. 4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submits that he has not disputed the fact that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioners. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioners and the injured had already been discharged from the hospital, I find it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail on reasonable conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramnad and on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 1 & 2 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am., until further orders and the petitioners No.3 to 6 being women accused shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which the petitioner for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed. sd/- 09/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, RAMNATHAPURAM 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMNATHAPURAM 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RAMANATHAPURAM BAZZAR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DT, 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. R.SUNDAR Advocate SR.No.43026 GH : 15.12.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16012 of 2011 Date :09/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/