WWWW uizoo 3m W (W) a D x o i35/aj w ' P- CO N0- E1200 -mm<w> \| VA WWW WWW I WWW WW éwifdnm, Ruies against imposition of penaity‘. However, the Appeiiate Authonty instead of deciding the appeal, had Jha by the same order from during pendency of that a‘ decided tiil date. He further diSposed of with liberty tc apphcation - j representation substituting her name in pia :e of her husband in the pending appeai and on such application being made, the respondent. No. as also the pending appeai Within l shah decide the appiication a specified period. Shri RS. Koshy with . Vcounsel appéaring far the petitioner fdes application departmentai ia‘ _ ea} before posts and grades for a periad of two years with cumulative effect. v L€arned counse‘l for thé petitioner submits that iate Shri RR Jha haci preferred appegi under Ruie 36 of therCoai India Limited {Conduct Discipiine and Appeai) ansferred and reieased Shri RR ' piace of posting. S‘hri Jna died 1 and the appeai has not been submits that this petition may be the petitioner to file suitabie before the respondent No. i for Shri Vinod Deshmukh, iearned respondents submits that if the for substitution in the pending ‘1e respondent No. 1 and further files representation for decidii g the appeai itseif, the respondent WWWW—Fs/Qs—l 1 /zoos 1,00,000. \ p ‘ s a EWWW Q a)ND,13§/03 ’ . 5 ....................................-. .............. Eizoo Wagm (W) @{j}