?§§&E $E§i£€§§=§ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. [S] No. 50)?$ OF 2010. 3. Block Education Officer, Abhanpur, District Raipur (C. G.) ' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER K, ‘Shankar Lal‘DruW, S/o. Shri ParsuRam Druw, aged about 52 years, Lecturer, Shri B. D. Govt. Higher Secondary Abhanpur, District Raipur (C. G.) V E R S U S RESPONDENTS :1. “/State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, \ . Education Department, D.K.S. o}. C3 y. My: «‘3’ Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) / ‘ Q 2. District Education Officer, Raipur, District Raipur (C. G.) .37% 2:00 \ m w Lei ..) .®.¢’ m W (Wu) WWW WWW mmm Wmw§wm 1 mimm SB : HDN’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRI’I‘INKER DIWAKER 20.16.2010 Shri Jitendra Gupta, counse [for the petitioners. Counsel for the petitioner siubmits that the petitioner is entitled to benefit of two advance having passed B.’I‘.l. examination before his appointment at his issue involved in the present 1d the same has been finally Court in the case of Asha 009 {IIIBMPJR (SC) 59. this Court has also taken a 2.2009‘yassed in W.P.(S) No. bner further submits that. the Writ Anpeai NO. 124/ 2009, tof the Supreme Court in the 1e order passed by this Court. 2009, directions have been ise for grant of two advance 1.9.1974 issued by the State on of the facts pleaded in the own cost. {t is submitted that the petition is no longer res integra a] decided by the Hon’ble. Supreme Saxena Vs. State of M.P. & 01's. 2 It is further submitted that similar View in its order dated. ‘6.i 625?] 2008. Counsel for the petitit order dated 29.4.20 10 passed in wherein relying uyon the judgmen‘ case of Asha Saxena (supra) and t; in another Writ Appeal Nor 871 issued for consideration of the c: increments as per circular dated 2 of Madhya Pradesh, after veriiicati petition, Counsel for the State subm Lts that case of the petitioner .\ would also be considered on the same lines. Shri Vivek Shanna, PL. for the State. increments on account of he XI-HC 78 . N?©)NS¢H%§D mm 200 mm (Wu) WWW WWW WW§WW WWW $a1‘mm In View of above, the pet:.tion is disposed of with a direction to the respond€nt authoriies to decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21.91974 issued by the S1ate of Madhya Pradesh after verification of the facts pleaded in the petition Within a period of eight weeks n‘om today. Sd/- « Pritinker Diwaker Judge ’ Ln