vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.507 OF 1982 SUIT NO.507 OF 1982 SUIT NO.507 OF 1982 M/s.Bussa Construction ... Plaintiff V/s. MHADA & Ors. ... Defendants Mr.U.P. Bobde i/b Pandya & Poonwala for Plaintiff Mr.P.G. Lad for Defendants CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED: JANUARY 27, 2009 JANUARY 27, 2009 JANUARY 27, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This suit had appeared before this Court on 7th January 209 under the caption ‘Commissioner’s Report’ when the parties were directed to file their original documents in Court on or before the next date of hearing i.e. on 14.1.2009. 2. On 7th January 2009, the learned advocate appearing for the plaintiffs had sought discharge in the matter. For reasons set out in the said order the advocates for the plaintiffs were discharged from appearing for the plaintiffs in the present suit. However, they had undertaken to inform the plaintiffs that they had sought discharge and the matter would appear before this Court on 27.1.2009 i.e. today. : 2 : 3. The advocates for the plaintiffs (now discharged) have today submitted that pursuant to the orders dated 7.1.2009, they have issued notice to the plaintiffs informing them that they have withdrawn their appearance and the matter would appear before this Court today and that they would not be responsible if any adverse orders are passed in the matter against the plaintiffs. The said notice is accepted by the office of the plaintiffs on behalf of plaintiff Nos.1 and 2 on 19.1.2009. A copy of the notice is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. 4. However, today, none appears for the plaintiffs. It is therefore clear that the plaintiffs are not interested in prosecuting the suit any further. The suit is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. (S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)