:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1973 OF 2007 Anees Ahmed Hanif Ahmed Shaikh and anr. ..Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Ms. Rajeshri N. Poojari i/by Khan Abdul Wahab for petitioners. Mr. Y.M. Nakhawa, APP for State. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. Date : July 10, 2007. Date : July 10, 2007. Date : July 10, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicants who are the accused in Sessions Case No. 119 of 2007 presently pending before the Sessions Court for Gr.Bombay. The learned Advocate for the accused no.3 made an application on 14/4/2007 seeking directions against the prosecution to provide the copies of the following documents:- (a) Complete set of Medical Papers. (b) EPR Register extract. :2: (c) The extract of SDE showing the receipt of information by the respondent on the day of incident. 2. The said application came to be rejected by the impugned order dated 5/6/2007 and the learned 6th Ad-hoc Addl. Sessions Judge observed in the order that none of these documents have been filed along with the charge-sheet and as such at this stage there was no material prima facie to believe that the prosecution was intending to rely upon these documents during the trial. As and when any of these documents are placed on record by the prosecution, copies of the same will have to be served on the defence lawyer and, therefore, no fault could be found with the impugned order. 3. The application is rejected summarily. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)