IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14223 of 2003 GHURAN NAYAK Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 11.02.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the respondents. There is no dispute that the impugned order canceling the licence of the petitioner is an appealable order under Clause 28 and the petitioner has not exhausted such alternative remedy. Realizing this difficulty, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application in order to file an appeal. It is made clear that since the writ petition had remained pending for all these period, if the appeal of the petitioner is filed within a period of one month from today the same shall be entertained and disposed of on merit without insisting for limitation taking into account that this writ application was filed on 18.12.2003 and is being disposed of only today. With the aforementioned observation this application is permitted to be withdrawn. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)