<*W» , / ‘ . A .. ‘u 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH @sc.Petition No. 7 Ci g 1985‘. ‘a‘m PETITIONERS r . l. M/s. JAI BAJRANG CEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED, a Company duly incorporated under the‘ relevant previsions of the Companies Act, 1956, having its Registered Office at "'Gharonda“, Ravi nag‘ar, AT JABALPU'R . Raipur and a mini cement plant at village‘kPandripani, P.C.No.,59, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar, (Madhya Pradesh) . \ ‘ 2. SHRI JAGDISH AGRAWAL son of Shri Ram Richhpal, aged abcut 34 years, Chairman, Director and Share-'—holder, M/s. Jai Bajrang Cement Private Limited, resident of Jail Road, Fafadih—ward, Raipur, City, T'ahsil and District Raipnr, (M.P.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : l. The State of Madhya‘ Prad‘esh ————_.._.._ through the Chief Secretary to the Government of Madhya Pradesh Vallabh— Bhawan, Bhopal City, TahSil and - ulstrict Bhopal, (M E ). K 2. The’'Collector, Bastar, P.QV.‘ Jagdalpur, District Bastar, (M.P.). I I ' \ u (coihtd.;.f_2> fI 7 Illllllyyygyyjymylllllll } C & R 3. The Sub—Divisional Officer, Jagdalpur, PaO. Jagdalpur, ‘District Bastar, (M.P . ) . &4. The Commissioner of Industri‘.s, Government 0£ Madhya Pradesh, havingwj its office at ”Vindhyachal“, Bhepal, City, Tahsil and District Bhopal, (r131: §\ 5. Shri Ghewar Chand Khatri son cf Fatah Cha\nd, ageti about '46 years, ‘1 resident of'J‘agdalpur, District Bastar, (M.P u) . I 6. Union of India, represented by'Vthe Government of India, Ministry of Inoustry, “Nirman—Bhawan“, New Delhi“ PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTETUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS etca AND/OR FOR ORDER/ORDERS AND/OR DIRECTION/DIRECTION§ IN THE NATURE OF WRITS. The humble petition of the‘abovenamed. Petitioners respect£ully SHEWE’I‘H 1. The Petitioner No.1 is a Company duly incorporated under the relevant provisions o£ the (contd. . 3) ,' C—i 2wri yi HIGH. COLJRI OF CHHATTISGARH :jllLASEUFi WRIT PETITION NO 798 OF 1985 ‘ IElriljgBii M/s. Jai Bajrang Cement Private ‘ Limited & Another Versus ‘ ‘Rh‘”x*;F‘t"m{3|:NTS The State of Madhya Pradmh é; Others (Writ pétition under Article 226 & 227 ofthe Constitution of India) ESingIe Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K‘ Agnihotri, J‘ PI‘ca'wirll :~ Name for the petitioner t3hri Ethashank Thakur, Panel Lawyerforthe State. Shri Kashif Shakeei, standing counsel for the Union of lndia. QR ER QBAQ (Fieltstsed on this 8‘ day 0f September, 2010) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasione, none tattiweaire nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner: The petitioner not be interested in the matter. may In View of the above, the writ petition is; dismiseecl fur want ol‘ pttisaewtion V .v “WW z 5w- i SATKSH KAGNtHoTm Judge ‘Y