IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 5TH DECEMBER 2008 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 35972 of 2008(G) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------------- SAILAJA DEVI.J., U.P.S.A, M.A.I. HIGH SCHOOL, MURUKADY, PEERUMADE, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE MANAGER, MAMKOMPU AUNDI IYER HIGH SCHOOL, MURUKADY, PIN 685 535, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 2. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PEERUMADE. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI. 4. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. N.JAYASREE, L.P.S.A., M.A.I. L.P.SCHOOL, MURUKADY, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.35972/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT Ext.P1 is the order appointing the petitioner as UPSA in the school, of which the first respondent is the Manager. That appointment was also approved. It is stated that, subsequently, the 5th respondent was also appointed as UPSA in the High School. Later Ist respondent transferred petitioner as UPSA in the U.P School and the 5th respondent as LPSA in the LP School. Petitioner submits that accordingly she joined on 1.6.2008 itself, but the 5th respondent represented against the transfer to the second respondent. The 2nd respondent ordered to withhold the petitioner's salary and against that order the Manager filed Ext.P2 to the 3rd respondent, resulting in its rejection by Ext.P3. WP(c).No.35972/08 2 2. Petitioner submits that aggrieved by Ext.P3, she has moved the 4th respondent by filing Ext.P4. In this writ petition although complaints have been raised on the merits of the controversy, having regard to the fact that Ext.P4 is pending before the 4th respondent, I am satisfied that the 4th respondent shall consider the same and pass orders on it. 3. Therefore, if Ext.P4 has been received and is pending, the 4th respondent shall consider the same with notice to the petitioner and respondents 1 and 5, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 8 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 4th respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. WP(c).No.35972/08 3