IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8717 of 2010 AMAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 21.04.2010 Heard both sides. This case reflects misuse of the privilege of bail. By order dated 5.3.2008 (Annexure-1), the petitioner was granted bail by this Court subject to the condition that he shall continue to appear in person in the case on each and every date. Petitioner defaulted in such appearance on one date which resulted in cancellation of bail bonds. He is in custody since 28.8.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner made diverse submissions with reference to pleadings in order to demonstrate the circumstances that prevented him from appearing on that particular date. It is contended that the petitioner shall abide by the conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner has remained in custody for nearly two years. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R.K. Dwivedi, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Khagaria in connection with G.R. case no. 66 of 2007(arising out of Gogari P.S. case no. 10 of 2007) subject to the following conditions: (i) One of the bailers will be own/close 2 family member of the petitioner. (ii) The petitioner shall appear in person on each and every date fixed in the Court below. In case of default on two consecutive occasions, the bail bond of the petitioner shall be cancelled and thereafter the Trial Court will be at liberty to secure his arrest in accordance with law. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )