IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 643 OF 2008 MR. ASHOK NILU SALGAONKAR AND 2 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus DION D'SILVA (DECEASED) THROUGH LR'S ... Respondent Mr. Valmiki Menezes, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N. N. Sardessai, Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- SMT. R. S. DALVI, J. Date:- 17th April, 2009 P.C. The interim order of the Deputy Collector and S.D.O., Mapusa dated 01.08.2008 is challenged in this petition. It has partly set aside the order of injunction granted by the Mamlatdar, Mapusa dated 28.12.2006. The petitioners claim to be the mundkars in respect of one house on the suit land. The petitioners claim oral lease in respect of the suit paddy field. The suit property is on chalta no.68/1 and 64/16. The respondents admit the possession of the petitioners in the house as claimed by them as well as the lease of the paddy field. 2. The petitioners also claim the bunds and the areas surrounding the paddy field admittedly belonging to the respondents, upon the premise that the petitioners have right in the areas around the paddy field as the petitioners have a mundkarial house close by. The Mamlatdar granted interim injunction to the petitioners in respect of such land also. In the impugned order, the Deputy Collector has considered total lack of evidence in respect of the land other than the mundkarial house and the lease with regard to the cultivation of the paddy. The order is not perverse. The order considered the mundkarial house and the paddy field separately from the other properties belonging to the respondents. There is no merit in the petition. The petition is dismissed. SMT. R. S. DALVI, J. lh/.