IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 6TH JULY 2007 / 15TH ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 14838 of 2006(N) -------------------------- OS.186/1989 of ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT,NEDUMANGAD .................... PETITIONER: ------------ 1. KAMALAMMA, D/O. RUDRAYANI AMMA, VIJAYAMANDIRAM, THANIMODU, VETTAMPALLI MURI, ANADU VILLAGE, NEDUMANGADU TALUK, TRIVANDRUM. 2. VIJAYAKUMARAN NAIR, S/O. SIVASANKARAN NAIR, VIJAYAMANDIRAM, THANIMOODU, VETTAMPALLI MURI, ANADU VILLAGE, NEDUMANGADU TALUK, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.R.S.KALKURA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. PETER, S/O. SIMON, LITTLE FLOWER COTTAGE, MOSQUE LANE, KESAVADASAPURAM, VAYALARIKATHU MURI,ULLOOR VILLAGE 2. GEORGEKUTTY, S/O. SIMON, LITTLE FLOWER COTTAGE, MOSQUE LANE, KASAVADASAPURAM, VAYALARIKATHU MURI,ULLOOR VILLAGE 3. JAYARAJ, S/O. SIMON, LAKSHMI NAGAR, KESAVADASAPURAM, KODUNGANOOR MURI, KOWDIAR VILLAGE. 4. MARIA, D/O. SIMON, PULIMOTTIL LANE, CHARANIKUZHI, NEYYATTINKARA VILLAGE. 5. C.P. RADHA, W/O. JAYARAJ, LAKSHMI NAGAR, KODUNGANOOR MURI,KESAVADASAPURAM. 6. RAJEEVRAJ, S/O. JAYARAJ, LAKSHMI NAGAR, KODUNGANOOR MURI,KESAVADASAPURAM. 7. RANIRAJ, D/O. JAYARAJ, LAKSHMI NAGAR, KODUNGANOOR MURI,KESAVADASAPURAM. 8. ISSAC, S/O. SIMON, MOSQUE LANE, TC.NO.2/132, KESAVADASAPURAM, VAYALARKATHU MURI, ULLOOR VILLAGE. 9. PATHROSE, S/O. SAIMON, MOSQUE LANE, TC.NO.2/132, KESAVADASAPURAM, VAYALARKATHU MURI, ULLOOR VILLAGE. 10. STEPHENSON, S/O. SIMON, MOSQUE LANE, T.C.NO.2/132, KESAVADASAPURAM, VAYALARKATHU MURI, ULLOOR VILLAGE. 11. MERCY, D/O. SIMON, GRACE COTTAGE, ENCHAKAD, KOWDIAR, ARAMADA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 14838 of 2006 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of July , 2007 JUDGMENT It is seen that the petitioners have not complied with the orders passed by this court regarding the issuance of fresh notice to respondents 2 and 4. The order of stay has also not been extended after 2.10.2006. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the records have been take back by the parties perhaps in connection with the proceedings which are continuing in the court below. The learned counsel sought time to get in touch with the party so that the facts can be ascertained. I am not inclined grant time. The writ petition is dismissed for default. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. Dpk.