IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN TUESDAY, THE 28TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 6TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 24192 of 2010(Y) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ P.SUJANAPAL, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.LATE SHEKHARAN, PALANGADATH HOUSE, POST NALLALAM, AREEKODE, KOZHIKODE-27. BY ADVS. SRI.R.SUDHISH SMT.M.MANJU SRI.K.R.RANJITH RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOZHIKODE POST, KOZHIKODE-673 001. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NALLALOM POLICE STATION, NALLALOM POST, KOZHIKODE-673 027. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NALLALOM POLICE STATION, CHERUVANNOOR POST, KOZHIKODE-673 029. 4. SHAHUL HAMEED.M.P., S/O.NOORUDEEN MUTHIRAPARAMBATH, M.P.MANZIL, VAIDHYARANGADI, RAMANATTUKARA POST, KOZHIKODE-673 633. 5. O.VENKITESHAWARAN, S/O.ODUKKATHI IMBACHAN, RESIDING AT `KARTHIKA', THIRUVANNOOR, CHERUVANNOOR POST, KOZHIKODE-673 029. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI. T.K. VIPINDAS R4 & R5 BY ADVS. SRI.ARUN.B.VARGHESE SRI.JAYKAR.K.S. SRI.SREEJITH S.NAIR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SVS/ WP(C).No. 24192/2010(Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE PTITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 28/10/2009. P2: COPY OF THE RECEIPT FOR EXT.P1 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT OFFICE DATED 28/10/2009. P3: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 05/06/2010. P4: COPY OF THE RECEIPT FOR EXT.P3 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT OFFICEE DATED 05/07/2010. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE SVS/ THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.24192 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of September, 2010 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. This writ petition is filed seeking adequate police protection to the life of the petitioner as also lives of his family members. In response, the private respondents state that they have no intention to harm the petitioner or members of his family. We see from the materials that there are disputes between the parties in relation to certain money lending transactions. There are allegations and counter allegations as to commissions which may or may not be termed to be offences. Under such circumstances, we direct that the police will ensure that law and order as also public order, peace and tranquility are appropriately maintained, while the first respondent will have appropriate gaze over the activities of the petitioner as also the respondents. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- P.BHAVADASAN, Judge. kkb.29/09.