1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Petition No.844/2007 (Ganpat Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of order : March 25, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Sandeep Mehta, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. By the instant criminal misc. petition under section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has challenged the order dt. 5.2.2005 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases and Additional Sessions Judge, Merta (for short `the revisional court' hereinafter) whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner against the order dt. 1.4.2003 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Merta (for short `the trial court' hereinafter), was dismissed. I have carefully gone through the orders passed by both the courts below. 2 The trial court, by a well reasoned and detailed order, took the cognizance of offence under section 500 I.P.C. against the petitioner. On the revision, the revisional court did not find any error in the order passed by the trial court taking cognizance. The petitioner has already availed one remedy by way of filing a revision petition before the revisional court as envisaged under Section 397 Cr.P.C. Under the garb of a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks to avail a remedy of second revision. The second revision petition is barred by Section 397 (3) Cr.P.C. Even otherwise, it cannot be said that the order impugned would result in serious miscarriage of justice or abuse of process of any Court warranting interference in inherent jurisdiction. No case for interference is made out. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. [H.R.PANWAR],J. m.asif/-