IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 11966 of 2004 Between: 1 Paruru Nagi Reddy S/o P.Muni Reddy residents of Koramanigunta (V) Hamlet of Akkarampalle, Tirupati Urban Mandal chittoor District 2 Peruru Kondappa Reddy S/o P.Muni Reddy residents of Koramanigunta (V) Hamlet of Akkarampalle, Tirupati Urban Mandal chittoor District 3 Peruru Lakshma Reddy S/o P.Muni Reddy residents of Koramanigunta (V) Hamlet of Akkarampalle, Tirupati Urban Mandal chittoor District 4 Peruru Venkata reddy S/o P.Muni Reddy residents of Koramanigunta (V) Hamlet of Akkarampalle, Tirupati Urban Mandal chittoor District 5 Smt. K.Munemma W/o K.Bathi Reddy residents of Koramanigunta (V) Hamlet of Akkarampalle, Tirupati Urban Mandal chittoor District 6 Paruru Krishna Reddy S/o P.Muni Reddy residents of Koramanigunta (V) Hamlet of Akkarampalle, Tirupati Urban Mandal chittoor District 7 Smt. P.Lakshmamma W/o Late China Nagi Reddy residents of Koramanigunta (V) Hamlet of Akkarampalle, Tirupati Urban Mandal chittoor District 8 Padi Muni Reddy S/o Late P.Muni Reddy residents of Koramanigunta (V) Hamlet of Akkarampalle, Tirupati Urban Mandal chittoor District 9 Padi Anaki Reddy S/o Late P.Muni Reddy residents of Koramanigunta (V) Hamlet of Akkarampalle, Tirupati Urban Mandal chittoor District 10 Smt. Peruru Venkatakha W/o Late P.Gopalareddy residents of Koramanigunta (V) Hamlet of Akkarampalle, Tirupati Urban Mandal chittoor District 11 Smt. Peruru Subbamma w/o Late P.Venkata Reddy residents of Koramanigunta (V) Hamlet of Akkarampalle, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Chittoor District ... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Sub-Registrar of Assurances and Registration, Tirupati, Chittoor District 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer Tirupati Urban Mandal , Chittoor Distirct ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or Direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent ie., the Sub-Registrar of Assurancas and Registration, Tirupati in not registering the Sale-deeds presented by the petitioners herein relating to the schedule mentioned lands covered by Survey Nos. 135/7 -0-08 Cts., 135/2-0.09 Cts., 139/7-0.15 Cts., 114/10-0.10 cts., 145/5-0.07cts 55/3- 0.33 cts., 55/4 -0.13cts., 55/5- 0.17 cts., 55/6-0.06 cts., 55/7-0.06 cts., 55/8-0.02 cts., 55/9- 0-0.5 cts., 55/16- 0.21 cts., 55/19- 0.18 cts., 143/9 -0.19 cts., 143/10- 0.04cts., 150/1-0.12 cts., 150/2- 0.10 cts., 150/5- 0-22 cts., 150/8 -0.07 cts., 150/20 -0.11 cts., 150/3 -0.09 cts., 150/7-0.09 cts.,150/18 -0.07cts., 150/4 -0.13 cts., 150/19- 0.10cts., 150/21 -0.08cts., 150/9 -0.42 cts., 150/10 -0.24cts., 150/23-0.11 cts., 150/11-0.21cts., 150/12-0.47cts., 150/24-0.13 cts., 150/13-0.87 cts, 150/25-0.28 cts., 150/22-0.09 cts., 135/3-0.13cts., 135/5-0.17cts., 144/3-0.13cts., 144/7-0.08cts., 145/9-0.11cts., situated at Koramanigunta village, Hamlet of Akkararpalle, Tirupati Urban Mandal, chittoor District , as bad, illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdication Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondents .: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: 1. When W.P.M.P.15206 of 2004 has come up for hearing, both parties consented for disposal of main writ petition itself and accordingly the writ petition is taken up for hearing. 2. The petitioners who are 11 in number filed the writ petition questioning the inaction of the 1st respondent in not registering the sale deeds submitted by them. 3 . The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are the absolute owners of the lands in various survey numbers respectively, admeasuring Ac. 4-47 cents and therefore, the 1st respondent has no justifiable reason in refusing to register the documents presented by the petitioners. 4. Per contra, the learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the 1st respondent submits that the petitioners have not submitted any document and therefore, the question of rejection does not arise. 5. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Government Pleader, I deem it appropriate to direct the petitioners to present the documents for registration and thereupon the 1st respondent shall pass appropriate orders within two weeks from the date of production of the documents. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _________________________ B.Seshasayana Reddy, J. 22nd June, 2005 KM ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Sub-Registrar of Assurances and Registration, Tirupati, Chittoor District 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer Tirupati Urban Mandal , Chittoor Distirct 3. 2 CCs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 4. 2 CD copies THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 11966 of 2004 22nd June, 2005