THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 9749 OF 2011 O R D E R: Learned Government Pleader for Revenue has taken time on 11.04.2011 to obtain necessary instructions from the respondents. On the said day, I directed the respondents not to demolish the thatched structures erected by the writ petitioner herein on the site in question. Today, after receipt of instructions, the learned Government Pleader states that the land on which the thatched structures have been built up by the writ petitioner is classified as a poramboke land and it belongs to the Government. The case of the writ petitioner is that she is working as a daily wage employee and she has constructed a thatched house on a poramboke land more than 15 years ago and the total extent of land in her possession is only 30 square yards. It is also stated that she has got the house assigned a door number and assessed to property tax by the local authority. It is further stated that she is in possession and enjoyment of this thatched house for the past over 15 years. The respondents will first of all examine as to whether the writ petitioner herein is an eligible person for assignment of a house site patta in her favour or not. They will also ascertain as to whether the land in question, which is said to be a poramboke land, which is vested in the Government, is fit for being assigned as a house site at all or not. In case it is found to be suitable for assignment as a house site, the 2nd respondent Revenue Divisional Officer will examine the matter and in case the writ petitioner is eligible, he will take necessary steps to assign her 30 square yards of site occupied by her, whereon she is said to have raised a thatched hut. Let this enquiry be completed within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Until this enquiry is completed and appropriate decision is taken and communicated to the writ petitioner, the thatched structure raised by the writ petitioner shall not be demolished by the respondents. At the same time, the writ petitioner also shall not further seek to occupy any more land or improve upon the existing thatched hut. With this, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. ---------------------------------- (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 18th April 2011 ksld