1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2399/2008. Smt.Soma Devi. VERSUS State of Rajasthan and Others. 10.07.2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.C.L.Saini, for the petitioner. Mr.B.K.Sharma, Deputy Government Advocate. Mr.Manish Gupta, for the respondents. ***** Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the grant of lease of the land to the respondent No.5 for the purpose of marriage hall for a period of three years by the Municipal Board. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondent Municipal Board has decided to grant the lease without there being any resolution of the Board in that behalf. Notices were ordered to be issued and in pursuance of which reply has been filed by the respondents. In the reply, the respondents have categorically stated that the decision taken by the Board in its meeting held on 24th and 25th February, 2007 for setting up a marriage hall on the land in dispute and for this purpose in the meeting held on 22.12.2007 also a decision was taken to put the land to auction and as a result thereof the auction was held in which 2 the highest bidder gave a bid of Rs.13.5 lacs with the stipulation of 25% increase in the lease money every year. The aforesaid bid was accordingly accepted and has been recorded in the minutes of the Board (Annexure-7) dated 22.12.2007. The said meeting of the Board was also attended by the petitioner whose name appears at S.No.32 and was party to the resolution. In the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere. Even otherwise, the writ petition is not maintainable as the petitioner has alternative remedy under Section 300 of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 of filing a revision petition. Consequently, this writ petition stands dismissed. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.