FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directios and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 5 CA/10150/2011 ,In FA/3396/2011 SANTOSH GANPATRAO THATE VERSUS ASHAMATI BABASAHEB CHANDANE AND ORS ... Advocate for applicant : Mr. Pahune Patil Nandkishor J. Advocate for Respondents 1 to 5 : Mr. P.C. Mayure ... CORAM : A. V. POTDAR, J. Dated: November 23, 2011 ... PER COURT :- 1. By this application under Order 40 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the applicant has moved this court seeking leave to tender evidence in this court about the documents annexed. 2. As the documents which the applicant intends to tender are the copies of public document, learned counsel for respondents oppose production of documents. 3. Fact remains that the claim for compensation was allowed against the present applicant but the public document clearly indicates that on the date of accident applicant was not the owner of the vehicle. The vehicle was transferred in the name of one Ashok Piraji Shelke. This Ashok Piraji Shelke on executing requisite bond has taken custody of the offending vehicle from Sailu police station in connection with C.R. No. 91/2009 for offence FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directios and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS under section 304(A) of the Indian Penal Code r/w certain sections of the Motor Vehicles Act. Thus the documents are going to the root of the matter and certainly going to affect the judgment and award. In the light of this, application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses ‘A’ and ‘B’ and stands disposed of. ( A. V. POTDAR, J. ) ... dyb