IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1018 of 2010 DHANANJAY RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 05/ 9.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. None appears on behalf of the complainant at the time of hearing of this anticipatory bail petition. Petitioner is husband of the complainant and admittedly, marriage was solemnized on 8.7.2008 but allegedly, complainant was subjected to cruelty by her husband on account of illegal demand and subsequently, she was ousted from her matrimonial home on 17.9.2008 and after two days of the aforesaid incident, the present complaint case was filed. It appears that the complainant hardly led her married life in the house of petitioner for the period of two months. Furthermore, it appears that in spite of issuance of notice to the complainant, she did not appear before this court though a vakalatnama has been filed on her behalf. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that complainant herself does not want to lead her conjugal life with petitioner as petitioner is a poor labourer. Considering the above stated circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner(Dhananjay Ram), in the event of his arrest/ surrender within 30 days from the date of communication of the order be released on bail in connection with Complaint Case no. 3121 of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub divisional Judicial 2 Magistrate, Chapra subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J))