IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.455 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: November 9, 2009. Nathan Kumar ...Petitioner(s) v. Smt. Reshma Devi & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: None for the petitioner. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): As per the Office report, dasti notices issued to the respondents have not been received back served or otherwise. Vide order dated 10.3.2009, notice of motion was issued to the respondents No.3 and 5 only. In spite of the fact that service upon the aforesaid respondents was ordered to be effected by way of dasti process, till date the petitioner has failed to serve the aforesaid respondents despite many opportunities. In view of the aforesaid fact that the petitioner has failed to serve the respondents, who are alleged to have committed contempt of this court, and the fact that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, I am not inclined to proceed further in this petition. Rule discharged. November 9, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge