1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 24. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.60/2009 In WP/1956/2009 (Kailas s/o Sukhdeo Mokate vs. Sukhdeo s/o Nema Mokate) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. Yuvraj Kakade, Adv., for the petitioner. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:2-3-2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr.Kakade, Counsel for petitioner, extensively. 2. The alleged contemnor has executed sale deed of the property inspite of there being restraint from the Court. The respondent no.1 expired. Consequently, any contemptuous act, will not answerable by legal representatives. Independent steps, if any, as advised, are permitted. Contempt Petition disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/60-09cp