1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUD ICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 864 of 2009 Ramkumar Santoshkumar Gupta ...Versus... Mrs. Neeta Ramkumar Gupta and one ................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................ [Mr. S.V.Sirpurkar, Advocate for Applicant.] [Mr. O.Y.Khashid, Advocate for Non-applicants] CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 22.03.2010 Heard. Pursuant to the order dated 28th August, 2009, the applicant was supposed to deposit balance 50% amount. Since then the applicant has been seeking time and this Court has given him several dates to comply with the said order of this Court. Today, Mr. Sirpurkar, the learned counsel makes a statement that his client is unable to make any payment and is not in a position to comply with the said order of this Court. The statement is accepted. In view of the fact that applicant has no desire to deposit the arrears of maintenance, but is interested only in keeping the application pending 2 in this Court, there is no reason to entertain the instant proceedings. In view of the statement made by Mr. Sirpurkar, the learned counsel for applicant, the criminal application is dismissed for want of compliance of the order of this Court. JUDGE Diwale