IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3993 of 2006 BIJAY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with CWJC No.4172 of 2006 BHAGWAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with CWJC No.16210 of 2007 KAPILDEO PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with CWJC No.12622 of 2008 INDU BALA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with CWJC No.13987 of 2008 LAXMI NARAYAN SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with CWJC No.18248 of 2008 SUNAINA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with CWJC No.18202 of 2008 SURESH PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with CWJC No.18663 of 2008 BINDIYA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with CWJC No.18722 of 2008 SHIVJOTI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with - 2 - CWJC No.18785 of 2008 SAMPHULWA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with CWJC No.1459 of 2009 MUNNA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with CWJC No.1512 of 2009 BHAGIRATH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with CWJC No.437 of 2009 SHAMIYA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with CWJC No.3881 of 2009 SITA RAM YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with CWJC No.3889 of 2009 BINDESHWARI PRASAD YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with CWJC No.4397 of 2009 MUSAFIR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with CWJC No.4487 of 2009 MUSAFIR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with CWJC No.4408 of 2009 RAM AWADH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with CWJC No.4376 of 2009 - 3 - ASHOK Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- with CWJC No.14620 of 2008 RAM NAGINA ROY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- And CWJC No.18250 of 2008 BINDIYA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 21.05.2009 In all the above noted writ application the issue involved is more or less similar, as such, with consent of the parties, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that their claims have remained pending for a considerable period of time and till date they have not received the retiral dues or the revised pension. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Corporation submits that the grievances of the petitioners shall be looked into. In the above circumstances, it is submitted that for redressal of the grievances the petitioners propose to file representation before the Commissioner of the respondent-Corporation giving specific details of the claim. In this view of the matter, it is directed that in - 4 - case such representations are filed by the petitioners within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order, the Commissioner of the respondent Corporation shall consider and dispose of the same by reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of the representation. The above noted writ applications stand disposed of. Let copy of this order be handed over to Mr. Vishwa Bibhuti Kumar Singh & Smt. Vinita Singh learned counsels appearing for the Corporation for immediate needful. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)