1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMM FOR JUDGMENT NO.778 of 2003 SUMM FOR JUDGMENT NO.778 of 2003 SUMM FOR JUDGMENT NO.778 of 2003 IN IN IN SUMM.SUIT NO.2256 OF 2003 SUMM.SUIT NO.2256 OF 2003 SUMM.SUIT NO.2256 OF 2003 M/s Associated Brothers .. Plffs versus M/s Wonderseal Packaging & anr.. Defts Mr Kirit Hakani for Plffs Mr Ashish Ramnath for Defts CORAM : D.G. CORAM : D.G. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J KARNIK, J KARNIK, J DATED : 26th April 2005. DATED : 26th April 2005. DATED : 26th April 2005. P.C:- P.C:- P.C:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The defences raised in the written statement by the defendant cannot be said to be sham and illusory. In the circumstances, the defendants are granted unconditional leave to defend the suit. Suit shall stand transferred to the list of commercial causes. The defendants to file the written statement within four weeks. 2 D.G.KARNIK, J