1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.642 of 2006 Shri Prajwalam Atmaram Rathod ..vs.. The State of Mah. through Secretary Ministry of Edu. and others. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.V.A.Baramhe Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.Fulzele, AGP for respondent no.1. Mr.C.S.Kaptan Adv. for Resp.no.14. Mr.Gopal Mishra Adv. for resp.6 and 8. C ORAM : D.B.BHOSALE AND PRASANNA B.VARALE,JJ. DATED : 3rd August, 2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this writ petition, the petitioner has made following prayers. (a) A Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing the respondent no.2 to cancel the admission of the respondent students; (b) An appropriate Writ, order or direction, interim in nature, directing the respondent no.2 to accord admission to the petitioner to an 2 appropriate college to which he is entitled to be admitted. Learned counsel for respondent no.11/College submits that all the respondents were admitted on the basis of the result of Maharashtra State Common Entranced Test, 2005 and almost all of them are at the verge of completion of the course. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that most of them have already got their caste claims verified and submitted the validity certificates. In view thereof, in our opinion, nothing further survives in this writ petition. In any case reliefs in the writ petition cannot be granted at this stage of the proceedings. It is pertinent to not that the petitioner also got admission in some private college and he is also pursuing his course. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE JUDGE. chute 3