IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1929 of 2009 Bindeshwari Mochi, son of late Rameshwar Mochi, resident of village and Post Office, Kewali, Police station Kauakol, District Nawadah…………………………..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Director, Primary Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate-cum-Chairman of the District Establishment committee, Nawadah, District Nawadah 4. The District Establishment Committee, Nawadah, District Nawadah through its Secretary 5. The District Superintendent of Education, Nawadah, District Nawadah…………Respondents ----------- 3 17.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has filed this writ application for a direction to the respondents to grant him B. A. trained pay- scale from the date his juniors were granted the same. In paragraph 13 of the writ application, petitioner has named the specific teachers, junior to him, who were granted the said scale from different dates. His grievance is that his case has been ignored. In spite of the fact that the writ 2 application was filed on 06.02.2009, till today no counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State. In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file a specific representation before respondent no.5, District Superintendent of Education, Nawadah giving details of his juniors, who were granted that scale. If such a representation is filed by the petitioner within one month from today, District Superintendent of Education, Nawadah shall examine the same, consider the averments made therein and if he finds that the case of the petitioner for grant of graduate trained scale is fit to be allowed, he shall place the matter before the District Establishment Committee, Nawadah in its next meeting for consideration, the District Superintendent of Education, Nawadah shall take a decision in the matter, either way, within two months from the date of filing of the representation. In case he does not find any merit in the claim of the petitioner, he shall pass a 3 reasoned order in accordance with law and communicate the same to the petitioner within that very period. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)