1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1065 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.3944 OF 1988 Tulsiram Ramdeen Rander .. Plaintiff Versus M/s.Madhusudan Rameshkumar and Ors. .. Defendants and Shreegopal Bhagirath Rander and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.B.Trilokani with P.Das Gupta i/b. Jhangiani Narula & Associates for plaintiff Mr.M.Mimani for defendant CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 23rd October 2008 P.C. . Heard Mr.Trilokani for plaintiff and Mr.Mimani for respondent Nos. 1 to 9 and defendant Nos. 1, 3 and 4. 2. Second defendant has expired and his heirs are respondent Nos. 1 to 9. There is 2 delay in taking out this chamber summons and the explanation is placed on record in the affidavit in support. Applying the liberal principles as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court this chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c). Amendments to be carried out within three weeks from today. Amended copy be served on newly added defendants within four weeks thereafter. Additional written statement, if any, to be filed within four weeks thereafter. 3. Mr.Mimani waives service of writ of summons on newly added defendants and the vakalatnama filed by Mr.Mimani for respondent No.1 to 9 i.e. newly added defendants shall be treated as vakalatnama on behalf of newly added defendants in the suit. 3 (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)