\ ZS'THB. BISH': (SIUR'E' ;;G)F, WI3H2&. PKABESa :XS '.3E&BAI<EBR Wcyt, EetitJ.OB Ne." w^ BETI'CI©KE& Sbly •Kaaax'.'Sliama^soa! @f:.::':s?^;i;:' 'iaavraBig'.ShaBna^aged' etbput;^1^ ^ •i37" ye&£s,ycesi&ewt^of'' 'Hanja]; • •y - ,para:,Etia.Faslyardis't:t;»RaJ..ga.i-ii,' ^M.'P.1':"':: ^ 1'-1 ~ : ••'-' '.• ./:l::-'.';'''.'w SESPOHDEKTS .,; t.. Sub Bivi?J.oaal. KharasiySt'dLstriet;, a.3P» :••. :/^:-.; :;:1-: l'.;': -: ''f' ^•'•^ 'w S.'.Dis'tric-fc »IailQr,Di ^'; .IEalgarh,M.;p... •;;1 ! ":, 3". ySugeSlafeenaent, tSeaifca3-: , IHc>;sp;Ltal,-<3waIJ.®r,-M.!E>T.: 4f. :'Ba.],Faag::y Shajtaa,!sQn of': • ? RamsaraFL .SBaFma/age^.dboufe •A25^1ssara,; reMetenfc'-'of^, ;^1,; -^ :--.'ta"'."::7 -', .-:-'•"'-'.'. .'"''•.."' '';.' '.--:-." :':..^,':--".'.':-;'^;...^''. .; •^I;[a'fc-thalg3ori»a3.s-t.'fe...Ra:£gaFh, :;'^''IB.P:.,.' •-:,- : :,:"''^ '. .;..-,-?i' "1:^;.:.':';'. 5»/'St^ti®Q'':IiGUS^O£fi.£:es,[;;^'?' :Kbar^siya,dis'fc't.;.RaigarS:K.:-' i?<'^l:M.E.'^-,'.'< ".•l..-::^I^T 1^:^^ •.SSS'L^Wi'^SSt^fSMSS3.^^2^2^'.M.i^^ ~^T^OS:3@i''.^BIS|g®i^%^»;^^''%^ ^XL-i.w,.:^^S'S;';;'L:S^ ^fQ'E'SS&SSQESEtmsSESS'ISSS'Sft aa.i: :SWWSSiSSSS. •s»ssS9SSSSSS. IINI HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.2894 OF 1994 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Shiv Kumar Sharma Versus Sub Divisional Magistrate, Kharsiya & Others *si (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri V.R. Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passedon this 18th dayofjuly, 2011) 1. Heard learned couhsel for the parties. 2. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay adequate compensation for violation of fundamental rights of the petitioner, who was put behind the bars illegally and thereafter sent to Mental Asylum, Gwalior. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits thaf on the basis of certificate issued by the authorities of the Mental Asylum, Gwalior, the petitioner was discharged. Nowhe is free and living like an ordinary man without having any problem, as alleged bythe authorities. Learned counsel further submits that due to the aforesaid reasons the petitioner has suffered damages mentally as well as otherwise. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to compensation from the respondents, as this was an act involving violation of the fundamental rights of the petitioner. 4. Be that as it may, at present the petitioner is a free man and he was discharged from the Mental Asylum, Gwalior on the basis of certificate granted by the authorities of Mental Asylum, Gwalior, ' and, as such, no grievance survives. •^ •-^-;;-!:S^-T;;^;'^ tei; :y .'.t'.i.'SS''' 6. 7. So far as adequate compensation, as sought for by the petitidner is Goncerned, the same cannot be determined or assessed without examining the damages caused to the petitioner mentally or otherwise, which requires proper scrutiny, examination of evidences, etc., and, assuch, the same cannot be done by the High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article_226 of the Constitution of India. In the resylt, the writ petition is shorn of ment and is aecordingly dismissed. However, it is open to the petitioner to take recourse to the competent civil Court for the aforestated relief, in accordance with law, if so advised. There shall be no order asto costs. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. AgnihofTi Judge "*i \/ jttiDi