IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1064 of 2011 UMESH DAS, SON OF RAMASHRAY DAS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 14.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 771 of 2004/197 of 2007 arising out of Tajpur P.S. Case No. 299 of 2001 registered under Sections 395, 397, 364A of the Indian Penal Code. It appears from perusal of the impugned order as well as from submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that earlier petitioner was on bail but after commitment he did not appear before the trial court and subsequently, his bail bond was cancelled and thereafter, warrant of arrest was issued against him. It further appears from the impugned order that the petitioner is in jail custody since 13.09.2010. It is not clear from the impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge as to whether after commitment of the case any notice or process was ever served upon the petitioner or not. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court- IV, Samastipur in connection with above stated Sessions Trial No. 771 of 2004/197 of 2007 subject to condition that one of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )