AMBNDMENT PBTITION IN THE HIGH CQURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No.^^5'^ /2006 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Kamal Narayan Singh S/o Late Shri Har Prasad Singh, aged about 70 years, by caste Thakur, resident of Karbala Road Kumharpara, Juna Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. The Mayor, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Ajit Singh S/o Sardar Dayal Singh Juneja. 5. Asit Pal Singh @ Bholu, aged about 35 years S/o Ajit Singh. 6. Amit Pal Singh S/o Ajit Singh. (Respondents No.4 to 6 all by caste Sikh, all resident of Karbala Road, Kumharpara, Juna, Bilaspur, Tahsil and Distriet Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR WRITS, ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE --33 XI-HC-78 3II^T?iT^-(H? (IStT3f^rsh*l w*iw sh+ii<n 35?'^Wld<<,®Tn<i'is,(°K'ii<-iy .w^.^n.l^ 200 311^1 yd* (l^3^)T) ??gTW:HfeT3f1^T 09.10.2006 Shri Amrito Das, Counsf ShriArun Sao, Govt. Ad|i No.l, None for other awaited. Heari. At fhe veiy putset, subinits fliat for the present, a direction that fhe Muiu.cipal| the representation offhe petitij of the provisions of Section 2C| 1956. A perusal of Aiuiexure was filed by 3 persons namely and Bhagwati Devi on 4/4/20( of Kamal Narayan Siugh, whc represen.ttiig. Leamed counsel for fhe the provisions of Section 205 Corporation has power to d passing appropriate orders iu ofby giving directioas Uke abo\ This liinifed prayer petitioner is not disputed by le; The same is atlowed. I forthe petitioner. Focate for fhe State/respondent respoii^lents. Their service reporfs are +i<ifci'in-< tii*iciTifte(^)'<f°i'h;K ^siRnTsn^CT Vfamed counsel for the petitioner tfiis petition niay be disposed ofwifh Corporation, Bilaspur, wffl consider [iner ffled vide Annexure P-8 in Ught p of fhe Miuucipal Corporation Act, P-8 shows that fhis reprcsentation Kamal Narayan Singh, Sheela Devi )6. This is a petition ffled on behatf appears to be one of the persons petitioner submits that in view of |of the aforesaid Act, the Municipal ^spose of such representation by and this petition may be disposed je. in^de by leamed counsel for the dmed counselfor fhe State. ^^^ XI-HC-78 tfTH^lTSfrHI'b S^'^l'flc'l'il, ®n1«'is,Riciiuy ri3-..t?J.T...?.lj.'f?,J.0^^200 3T1^?T ira^? (yiI^sx^'sT) 3f]^T W lq-ti» gwai^rsRiri?; shyna TOfraTBfefw^T z- wilihout In view ofthe above, on ofher respondents, I deei^ would be served, if a directitin dispose of the aforesaid alongwith two other persons. It is directed that the look iato fhe inatter and d] 4/4/2006 (Annexure P-8), sai^ aad two other persons before The petition stands waiting for the semce of notices it proper that fhe ends ofjustice is issued to the Corporation to rep|resentati6u fBed by the petitioner K^urdcipat Corporation, Bilaspur shall jspose of fhe representation dated to have been fited by the petitioner^ Corporation. ^.^ s^^e llhe fma^y disposed Wllfl'fl-l *1W(lTff)>gIA <fa^l< ^iSTf^lTSn^T P.T.O.