IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH And THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 12525 of 2000 Between: 1 D.Saibabu, Son of Kistaiah, Government Junior College, Malkajigiri, Ranga Reddy District. 2 M.Venkata Subbaiah, Son of Venktesham Government of Andhra Pradesh, Malkajigiri, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Secretary to the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Secretary to the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner and Director of Intermediate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad. 4 The Principal Government of College, Malkajigir, Ranga Reddy District. 5 The Registrar, A.P. A.T., Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari by declaring the action of the Hon'ble A.P. Administrative Tribunal in not granting an interim order in O.A.NO. 4747/99 for payment of minimum time scale (Rs.2750-5150) is bad, arbitrary, illegal, unjust and unreasonable and consequently direct the Respondents to pay the salaries of the petitioners in the minimum time scale of pay of Vocational Lab Attenders i.e., Rs.2750-5150 p.m. w.e.f., the petitioner's first appointment. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.P.VENKATESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) Aggrieved of not passing any interim order by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.4747 of 1999 for payment of minimum time scale, this writ petition is filed by the petitioners D. Saibabu and M. Venkata Subbaiah. 2. Since, this Court also did not grant the interim order, which was sought for by the petitioners even before the Tribunal, and the writ petition is filed, pending disposal of the O.A., questioning the action of the Tribunal in not passing any interim order in that O.A., we are of the opinion that the petitioners are not entitled to any relief in this writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed. 3. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed. However, the Tribunal is directed to dispose of O.A. No.4747 of 1999 expeditiously, if not already disposed of. No order as to costs. __________________ V. ESWARAIAH, J July 23, 2009. __________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J DS/PV.