IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC (T) No.: 115 of 2008. Decided on: 29.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ Susham Lata. … Petitioner. Versus C. Bala Krishanan and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): The following direction was issued by the learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.3728 of 1999 on 31st December, 1999:- “However, till further orders, the appointment of the applicant on contract basis be not terminated if the post still exists and is vacant till a regular hand is appointed in his/her place.” 2. The present petition has been instituted by the petitioner stating that the order darted 31st December, 1999 has not been implemented in letter and spirit. However, it has come in the reply that the services of the petitioner were terminated after the joining of regular incumbent by way of promotion in accordance with Recruitment and 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - Promotion Rules. Since the petitioner was appointed as para teacher under the para teachers Policy, 2003, there is no merit in the present petition. Consequently, the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 29, 2010. (sck).