IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9574 of 2009 MEENA DEVI, W/O SAROJ SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – SISIRIT TOLA, P.S. – NOKHA, DISTRICT – ROHTAS. ………. PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS PRINCIPLA SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE ROHTAS, SASARAM. 4. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMIN OFFICER, ROHTAS. 5. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SASARAM. 6. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER NOKHA, DISTRICT – ROHTAS. 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER NOKHA, ROHTAS. 8. THE MUKHIYA NAWSARI PANCHAYAT, DISTRICT – ROHTAS. ……….. RESPONDETNS. ----------- 02/ 11.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner was selected for the post of Anganwari Sewika as would appear from the selection letter bearing memo no. 138 dated 13.10.2008, Annexure-3 to this application. In the light of the selection letter petitioner appeared before the competent authority for being sent for training but she is not being deputed for training. 3. Let petitioner represent before the District 2 Magistrate, Rohtas, who should consider her representation in the light of the selection letter dated 13.10.2008, Annexure-3 as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt of representation along with a copy of this order. 4. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. DKS/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)