IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50079 of 2008 1. NANKHI SAH, 2. DAY SUNDRI DEVI, 3. BINOD SAH, 4. AJAY SAH and 5. SANTOLA DEVI ==== Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 2.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Prayer for bail of petitioner no.3 was earlier withdrawn by order dated 2.2.2009 as he was arrested in seisin of the case. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the deceased died of natural death though vague allegation is leveled against all but the demand is specific and mainly upon the husband, the reality realized by the informant who later exonerated all including these petitioners from the liability if could be fixed upon them. Moreover petitioner no.1 is brother of father-in-law of the deceased and petitioner no.2 is his wife. Petitioner no.4 is younger brother-in- law of the deceased and petitioner no.5 is his mother. The circumstances suggested and discussed above do not justify the petitioners’ arrest. In the circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Bachhwara P.S.Case No.96/08, the above named petitioner nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI