1 CP-342.09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.342 OF 2009 IN R.A.E.SUIT NO.515 OF 2006 Jayesh Suresh Nanavati .... Petitioner Vs. New Ridgeline Properties .... Respondent Shri Y.C. Dhebar for the Petitioner. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JULY 23, 2010 P.C: This petition complains of disobedience of Consent Terms under which R.A.E. Suit No.515 of 2006 was disposed of by the Court of Small Causes Court. If this Court takes upon itself the work of execution of orders of the subordinate Courts in Western Maharashtra in exercise of its contempt jurisdiction, this Court will have no other business to do. The petitioner may approach the executing Court and seek execution of the order before the Court of Small Causes. If he is aggrieved by any order passed by that Court, he may file appeal, revision or even a writ 2 CP-342.09 petition. He can also invoke the jurisdiction under the Contempt of Courts Act if all these attempts fail. Rushing to this Court was totally uncalled for. The petition is dismissed by leaving liberty to the petitioner to have recourse to such remedies as may be available to him in law. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)