IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER TUESDAY, THE 11TH MARCH 2008 / 21ST PHALGUNA 1929 RP.No. 173 of 2008() in W.A.No..2420/2008 -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WA.2420/2007 Dated 16/11/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERs/APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS: ------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SINU CLETUS, S/O. CLETUS, "CEEJASS", TC NO.XXX/272, KALLUMMOODU, ANAYARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SMT. SIMI JOSEPH M., W/O. ANOOP, MADATHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, HOUSE NO.XI/37, NAYARAMBALAM P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) SRI.S.SUJIN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER,(PWD ADMINISTRATION), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033. 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, (IRRIGATION ADMINISTRATION), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033. BY ADV.SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS (SC) THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.KOSHY & A.K.BASHEER, JJ. ==================== R.P.No.173 of 2008 in W.A.No.2420 of 2007 ====================== Dated this the 11th day of March, 2008 ORDER J.B.KOSHY,J According to the review petitioner, this Court did not interpret Rule 15 (c) correctly. If Rule 15 (c) was not correctly interpreted, remedy of the petitioner is to file appeal to the Supreme Court. A review petition cannot be equated to a petition for rehearing of the matter or an appeal proceedings. No grounds are made for reviewing the judgment. Hence, the review petition is dismissed. J.B.KOSHY,JUDGE A.K.BASHEER,JUDGE dvs