IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR >9-0[\ L' M.C.C. No. £1. /6610' APPLICANT: .. 'etitioner ; •y,'€^y~ . *^< W-':ff^.!: -y" .^s ,/'-"'. <^ ..:i7 '^•"^' ..-••" \^ Shankar Shukla, aged about 71 years, son of Shri Ram Awatar Shukla, resident of Malviya Road, Raipur (CG) -Versus- State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, District Raipur (CG) Union of India, through the Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi AEPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF WRIT PETITION (C| N0^351/2010 DISMISSED orf^Srt OCTOBER. 2010 FOR NON- APPEARANCE 2f ft ) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA.SPUR ^ r- .\-^. .62of2011 PETiTIONER RESPONDENTS Rajendra Shankar Shuk!a VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh & Another. APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OFW.P.fC) N0. 4351/2010 Present: Shri K.R.Nair, Advocate forthe applicant. >. Smita Ghai, Advocate forthe respondent No.2. tst (Passed on this 21" day of February, 2011) l.A. No. 1. This is an appiication for condonation of deiay. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown ahd learned counsei appearing for other side has no objection. Delay is condoned. 1. Learned counsel appearina for the Detitioner submiis that the counsel for the petitioner could not appear on account of bona Me mistake, therefore, W.P.(C).No.4351/2010, which was dismissed on 23.10.2010, mav be restored to its fiie. 2. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P.(C). No.4351/2010, is restored to the oriainal file. 3. A copy of this order be piaced on record of the origina! writ petition and the same be iisted for heari.na. __ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge >/ AshoK