IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8438 of 2009 SANGEETA KUMARI, WIFE OF BALIRAJ KUMAR SINGH, R/V RAGHUNATHPUR, P.S.HASPURA, DISTRICT AURANGABAD---PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, AURANGABAD. 3. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, AURANGABAD. 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, ANCHAL HASPURA, DISTRICT AURANGABAD. 5. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, BLOCK HASPURA, DISTRICT AURANGABAD-----RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02. 23.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner was appointed as Aanganwari Sewika. Her services have been terminated by the District Programme Officer, Aurangabad under order bearing Memo No. 320 dated 23.6.2009, Annexure-3 with direction to make fresh appointment within 15 days. Against the order of termination dated 23.6.2009, Annexure-3 petitioner has filed appeal before the District Magistrate, Aurangabad dated 26.6.2009 and memo of appeal/representation is contained in Annexure-5 to this application. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that till date memo of appeal/representation, Annexure-5 has not engaged the attention of the learned District Magistrate, Aurangabad and the process for appointment as was directed by the District Programme Officer, Aurangabad is already on. 4. Having heard counsel for the parties, I direct the District Magistrate, Aurangabad to consider the memo of appeal/representation dated 26.6.2009, Annexure-5 as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. It goes without saying that any appointment made in the meanwhile shall be subject to the order passed in the appeal/representation of the petitioner. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)