IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No 7006 of 2008 ANIL KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR *** For the petitioner : Mr Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate *** 2 13.05.2008 The petitioner is aggrieved by order issued by the District Accounts Officer, Begusarai refixing petitioner’s emoluments and directing for recovery of excess emoluments paid, if any. For this challenge, petitioner has placed reliance on judgment dated 29.07.2004 passed in CWJC No 8333 of 1999 wherein similar order of the same District Accounts Officer, Begusarai has been set aside by this Court after full consideration of the matter. The petitioner brought this to the notice of the District Superintendent of Education, Sheikhpura by his letter dated 26.06.2007 which again has not been responded yet. In my view, it is better that this writ application be disposed of with a direction to the respondent-District Superintendent of Education, Sheikhpura to consider the representation of the petitioner and the applicability of the judgment aforesaid referred and decide the matter within one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order before him. His decision must be by a speaking order and it must be communicated to the petitioner within the aforesaid period. Petitioner, if aggrieved in any manner with the said decision, would have recourse to legal remedies as he may be entitled to. This, in my view, disposes of the writ application itself. M.E.H./ (Navaniti Prasad Singh)