1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ,xr WRIT PETITION No. 47é 0F2004 x/ PETITIONER Municipal CounciL Kanker ‘r" represented through Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council building, Kanker VERSU3 RESPONDENTS \e L\ .é % Collector bLW District Kanker (C.G.) Superintendent, Land Recordg (Nazul) Dial—is: Kanker (ca) \' ‘~' ‘ . State of Clihattisgarh Through Secretary. Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur N 4. Nayab Tehsildar (Nazul) Tehsil and District Kanker (C.G.) 5. Hemant Singh Rajput aged 57 yearS, s/o. Narayan Singh Raigut rfo. Jhuniapara Kanker Teiasil arid District Kaiiker (C.G.) ,r /‘ i ,2” / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS£ CERTIORARY AND/0R ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKE NATURE y,m 3a WW1, =mm .«n ‘, fmw W§$m ma§ gm W! 23.02.2004 Shm' Kishom Bhaduxi, Co sel for the petitioner. Shri Ranbir Singh, G.A. f 1‘ the State. Heard. It is submitted that an o4der was passed by the Nayab Tahsildar on 8.8.2003 (Anne e P/5 A) wherein it has been held that the Municipal Com i1 has encroached the plot. Against that an appeal as preferred before the Sub-Divisional Ohicer who h s (iismissed the appeal on 22. 1.2004 and ailitmed the 0rd .r of Nayab Tahsildar. Learned State Counsel s bmits that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said onier, he may prefer a revision petitioa before the Board of Revenue. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and material on record, it is directed that the petitioner may prefer a revision and also pply for stay before the Board of Revenue, which shall be considered on its own merits. With the aforesaid direct%ion, the petition fails and is dismissed at this stageukmMMy‘w C V e. X/R‘rj/hw //’SN, F akhrm‘di'“ gs”. mwamwm._mw-mm-mW.W.M,“m.,m”.”W m. Midge v s... .- {20a -—-—50.0<>G. n : v“?