IN THE HIGH COURT QF JUDICATURE CHHAmSGARH AT ff] Petitioner ..•;'•'.<? ~^^^ ,y ^^y ..-•"'d;.<':&^"l'"'^i/^ <ob .^ Shemradih, P.S. Suhela, ^''"Li^^^.''''""' ^srfy . •o~y ~ >>'~\' . Tahsil - Baloda Bazar, Dist : •^y'..-•'•"r ^"A '^''.^\ '^» Raipur-(C.G.) '^^y^^^Rcupu1"'"" Versus Respondents <- r.O^ ^' BILASPUR W.P.NO. ?£/'_,/ 2006 s^s^s^ ^^^tia'Sisg ShekhaS- Chandra@iekabDhruv S/o,. ^ap^ Late Shri Amaru (^a? Dhruv, Aged about 26 years, R/o Village Shemradih, P.0 7. 8. < State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Panchayat Avam Gramin Vikas Department, D.K.S Bhawan Raipur, Dist: Raipur-fC.G.) The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Bhatapara, Dist: Raipur-fC.G.) The Commissioner, Developraent Commissioner Office, Chhatisgarh Raipur, Dist: Raipur-fC.G.) The Additional Deputy Development Commissioner, Janpad Panchayat Bhatapara, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Dharsiva, Raipur, Dist: Raipur-fC.G.) The Chief Executive Officer District Panchayat (Development), Raipur, Dist : Raipur-(C.G.). The Collector Raipur, Dist: Raipur-fC.G.) State of Madhya Pradesh Through the Secretary Panchayat 8s Rural Development Department Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, Dist: Bhopal-fM.P.) XI-HC-22 -^si ^piRTq;.'^t?twre.' (re3^ 'S^K^ ^......,...........,.............,....^ an^l^il ,R-ticb SiR^I ^itiwgfOT sn^t 'Raiwaf??! qil^i^'l'i 'ETFR?f "^ 1^^ <f^ £.t^ ^sipgii an^n ^ falher 21-3-2006 Shri Oeepak Jain, counsel fc(r the Shri Satish Gupta, Dy.GovtJ Heardl.A.No.2432/2006Tor| Notopposed. For the reasons stated in same is atlowed. Let necessary Accortlingiy, I.A.No.2432/2006; Heard. By this petition under Articl^ the petitioner submits that his wprking in Janpad Panchayat, BhNts 'of appoihtment on compassional 10-5-2000 (A.nnexure-PQ). Vfde permission was granted to app<}int appointment order was not issuecj. (Annexure-P/6) it vvasasked by th^ beenappointed or not. It is subm|ted sincelongwithoutanyjustifiabte The very object of compas|sionE famiiy to tide over the sudden cryi matter in the ca&e of State of petitioner. lAdvocateforthe State ofC.G. bmendment. t|ie application (I .A.No.2432/2006), the an^endmentbe incorporafed. • stands disposed of. 226/227 of the Constitution of india, died on 19-4-2000 while he was i^apara. The petitioher applied for grant te ground before the auttiQrities on t>rder dated 8-5-2CX)2 (Annexure-P/3) the petiUoner as Peon, but the (. Vide communiGation dated 6-8-2006 authorities whether the petitioner has that ttie matter has been pending re&son. . asjsionate appointment is to ehabte the jis. The Apex Courthasdealtwith the Maniour vs. Md. Raiaodin reported in 2003 f7} SCC511 has held asundfer: The purpose of compassionate ground is deaih of ie breadwihner appwntments shoufcf, '-^immediaWytoredeemth^ pmwcSng appoinhnent on (o mWgate fte hard^ipdue to m ihe family. Such Viwefwe, be pmvided family in disti'ess." • • [^^a4 XI-HC-22 an$?[qii 1?;IR;3D^( St>^ ^!^ Gowt ?ai ^'lPlRfq, 'Srfe're, '{^?F5t sii^r LOf ^/6k TiitiMi ai*<!<» Haying considered the •material on record and in view o' been granted to appointthe post of peon and also in view o( the case of State of Maniour issue necessary appointment ori ttie petitioner wiihin a period production of copy of this order this Court. tntheresultthe petition is; Counsel fee Rs;1,000/-, if Certified copy as per rufe^ Copy to the State counsel facts and circumstances of the case, f the fact that the permission has already peljtioner oh compassionate ground on the the law laid down bytheApex Court in (supra), the respondents are directed to tlere in accordance with law in favour of <}f one month from the date of receipfe' and compliance report be submitted to allowed wiUi costs. eertified. afteramendment. / <^T^lt*fl<4iFI ^nH?Tf^ fS^t <M^$I< ^; aifigiT sv^v. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge t^^^.