IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4685 of 2009 PARMESHWARI MANDAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 12/08/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under sections 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant has alleged that she was raped by three persons including the petitioner. Submission is that the implication was on account of enmity and pendency of land dispute. The occurrence of 12.6.2007 was reported on 14.6.2007. In fact, the victim and her father are living on the land of the petitioner and they try to harass him. It is further submitted that the case was lodged on account of confusion and subsequently the informant has filed a petition by way of compromise saying that it was only assault and the petitioner has not raped her. That compromise petition is annexed here as Annexure-3. The informant was noticed and she entered her appearance through lawyer. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the informant that the compromise was filed by her but she was not knowing that the 2 allegation of rape has been denied in that compromise petition and again she filed a petition before the learned court below. Considering the wavering statements of the complainant at the different stages, the petitioner Parmeshwari Mandal is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M./concerned Court, Araria in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 66 of 2007. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)