IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.123 of 1988 SUIT NO.123 of 1988 SUIT NO.123 of 1988 State Bank of Patalia ..Plaintiff versus M/s. Vaz Forwarding Pvt. Ltd. ..Defendant. Mr.A.S.Doctor i/b. B. Munim & Co. for the Plaintiff Ms. Bhavana Bhatt for the Defendant Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 12th Dec., 2005 Dated : 12th Dec., 2005 Dated : 12th Dec., 2005 P.C. 1. Consent terms submitted by the parties. The parties to the suit present. They admit to have compromised the matter as per the consent terms and having signed the consent terms. The advocates appearing on both the sides also have signed the consent terms. Consent terms taken on record and marked ‘X’ . 2. Decree be drawn in terms of consent terms (X). 3. Issue necessary court fee refund certificate in the name of plaintiff as per rules. (S.R.Sathe, J.)