1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE WRIT JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.353 OF 2009 Mr.Ramesh D. Salaskar .. Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents. Mr.Shreekant V. Gavand, for Petitioner. Mr.S.N.Patil, for AGP for Respondent. CORAM: V.C.DAGA & A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATED: 22nd September, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is not pressing the petition since he has filed the election petition. He requested for expediting the election petition. Since, it is a matter pertaining to the election, it is well settled that the Court has to deal with it as expeditiously as possible. We hope that the trial court will decide the election petition as expeditiously as possible. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. (A.A.SAYED, J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) srj/- 2 srj/-