1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5993 OF 2011. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|_______________________________________ CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J. Date : 17.08.2011. 1. Heard Mr. P.N. Kutti, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the proceedings are being taken up against the provisions of law. Even against the dead person the execution is being proceeded. The provision of law governing execution are totally flouted. The petitioners are not at all liable to pay any amount. 3. The order impugned is arising out of proceedings under Rule 107 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules. The alternate remedy of revision is available to the petitioners. 2 In view of the availability of alternate remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the petition. The Writ Petition as such is dismissed. However, the petitioners are at liberty to prosecute revisional remedy available to them. If such a revision is filed, the authority shall consider the time spent in prosecuting the Writ Petition. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.17.08.2011. asp/office/wp5993.11 3