: 1 : IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 4051 OF 1990 NO. 4051 OF 1990 NO. 4051 OF 1990 WITH WITH WITH CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS 1719 OF 2007 SUMMONS 1719 OF 2007 SUMMONS 1719 OF 2007 Hirasingh Advani & Anr. ... Plaintiffs. V/s. M/s. Mahesh & Associates & Ors. ... Defendants. Mr. D. Mehta for the Plaintiffs. Mr. S.J. Khera for Defendant No.1. CORAM CORAM CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. : R.Y. GANOO, J. : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED DATED DATED : 08TH SEPTEMBER 2008. : 08TH SEPTEMBER 2008. : 08TH SEPTEMBER 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. :- :- :- . The Chamber Summons was granted thereby directing the Plaintiffs to offer inspection to the Defendants and complete the formalities on or before 31st August 2008. 2. Today the learned Advocate for the Plaintiffs submitted that Plaintiff No.1(b) who is in India has informed the learned Advocate for the Plaintiffs that she is not concerned with this litigation. The learned Advocate for the Plaintiffs further pointed out that Plaintiff No.1(a) who is out of India has not : 2 : instructed the Plaintiff in any manner whatsoever. The learned Advocate for the Plaintiffs submitted that the attorneys are without instructions and formalities regarding inspection has not been carried out. 4. In view of the submissions advanced by the learned Advocate for the Plaintiffs and the non-compliance of the order regarding grant of inspection, it is clear that the Plaintiffs are not interested in prosecuting the suit. Hence, the suit will have to be dismissed. 5. The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. 6. Chamber Summons No.1719 of 2007 is already disposed of. (R.Y. (R.Y. (R.Y. GANOO,J.) GANOO,J.) GANOO,J.)