IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33123 of 2009 SUDHIR YADAV, son of late Siya Yadav, resident of village – Malpur, Police station – Ghoswari, District – Patna. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 06. 10.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code including sections 399, 402, 353, 307 read with sections under the Arms Act. Submission of the counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner has been made accused only on the basis of a confessional statement and no T I P has been held till date. There are enough material and evidence based on which chargesheet has come to be filed. Veracity of such evidence will be verified during the course of trial. The Court may have considered the prayer for bail if the present case was isolated instance of the kind but from the report called for by this Court it appears that petitioner is involved in atleast six cases of serious nature. If that be so, then the petitioner is leading a crime of life and enlarging him on bail will be prejudicial to the interest of one and all. Looking at the nature of the allegation it will be in the interest that trial of the case is expedited. 2 The prayer for bail is rejected. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J )