IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23268 of 2008 DR. ANIL KUMAR Versus The STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.23379 of 2008 1. DR. SANKHADEB ACHARYA 2. Dr. Arun Kumar Das 3. Dr. Vinod Kumar Paswan 4. Dr. Sanjit Kumar Agrawal 5. Dr. Kumar Anand 6. Sudhir Sharma Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 8/ 08.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the A.A.G.5. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that counter version also appeared from the Superintendent of P.M.C.H. for the act of informant’s side. Moreover, under Section 307 of I.P.C. is super addition and no case under Section 307 of I.P.C. is made out as all the injuries are simple in nature. Even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest which is not justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with G.R. No. 2847 of 2008 arising out of Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 115 of 2008, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Patna subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of 2 Cr. P.C. The advocates of the Civil Court are not cooperating with petitioners. If still they are not cooperating then petitioners should be released on bail on their personal bond. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)