IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44543 of 2008 Ajay Kumar Verma, son of Late Bhubneshwar Prasad Verma, resident of village- Ghatho (Dayal Chouk), P.S. – Ghatho, Distt. Samastipur …………………….. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……………… Opp. Party ----------- 3 24.02.2009 The complainant has entered appearance through counsel. Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner stating that in compliance of the direction of this Court dated 22.01.2009, he along with his villagers and the Ward Commissioner, Begusarai had gone to his in-laws’ place to bring his wife, Rukmani Devi. In spite of persuasion and request, she was not willing to accompany him. In support of this contention, a petition signed by the Ward Commissioner, Sarpunch and others persons, has been annexed. Counsel appearing for the complainant submits that if husband again goes to his Sasural, she is willing to accompany her husband. I feel that complainant is putting unnecessary conditions before the petitioner. Prayer on behalf of the petitioner above named, for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed in case of his appearance within four weeks from today and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Begusarai in connection with Complaint Case No. 2519 C/2006. The petitioner and the complainant may fix a date on which the petitioner will appear before the Chief Judicial - 2 - Magistrate, Begusarai. Complainant should also come to the court of C.J.M., Begusarai on that date and if she is willing to go with her husband, she may accompany him from the court itself. Kundan (Mridula Mishra, J.)