IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 27554 of 2008 Between: Sri K.V.Satyanarayana, S/o K.Shankaraiah, Nizam Sugars Limited, R/o H.No.6-6-137, Karkanagandla, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Managing Director, Nizam Sugars Ltd., Shakkar Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 2 General Manager (Finance) Nizam Sugars Ltd., Shakkar Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 3 Govt.of Andhra Pradesh, Industries and Commerce Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad represented by Secretary. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari calling the records pertaining to proceedings of respondent vide NS/Met/PD/1395, dt.11-10-2002 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art.14 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to make the payments/terminal benefits under the VRS Scheme and pass such other order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.SRINIVASA RAO KURAPATI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition has been filed by K.V.Satyanarayana with a prayer to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling the records pertaining to proceedings of the 2nd respondent in NS/Met/PD/1395, dated 11.10.2002 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India. 2. As against the impugned order, dated 11.10.2002, passed by the second respondent terminating the services of the petitioner, the petitioner has to approach the Labour Court for redressal of his grievance. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Labour Court. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:22nd January, 2009. cs ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KSRANI}