THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.18934 of 2009 DATED: 09.09.2009 Between: Desireddy Sudhakar Reddy and others. .. Petitioners. And The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Nampally, Hyderabad, And others. .. Respondents. ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioners are aggrieved by the action of the 1st respondent in not disposing of the stay petition filed along with the revision petition on 07.09.2009 against the orders of the 2nd respondent dated 13.07.2009, confirming the orders of the 3rd and 4th respondents passed on 27.06.2008 and 28.01.2008 respectively. According to the 4th petitioner, he purchased various extents of land totally admeasuring Ac.6.74 cents in Sy.No.1089/2 situated at Tatiguntapalli, H/o. Moorevadlapalli, Vayalpad Mandal, Chittoor District (hereinafter referred to as the subject land), from petitioners 1 to 3, under different registered documents, and the said land is a private land. While that being so, the respondents have initiated proceedings under A.P.Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 and, ultimately, the 4th respondent-Tahsildar, Valmikipuram Mandal, vide orders dated 28.01.2008 cancelled the assignment of the subject land and ordered its resumption. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioners preferred appeal before the 3rd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, Madanapalle, Chittoor District, and the same was dismissed by order dated 27.06.2008, against which the petitioners have filed appeal before the 2nd respondent-Joint Collector, Chittoor District, and he, in turn, while passing orders on 13.07.2009 confirming the orders of the 3rd and 4th respondents, directed the 4th respondent to take possession of the subject land along with structures therein forthwith under cover of panchanama, if not already done and protect the subject lands. Challenging the orders of the 2nd respondent, a revision has been filed by the petitioners on 07.09.2009 before the 1st respondent-Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Nampally, Hyderabad. The main grievance of the petitioners is that though the revision filed by them before the 1st respondent is taken on file, till date no orders are passed on the stay petition. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the 2nd respondent, in his proceedings dated 13.07.2009, observed that the assignment file relating to the subject land is missing in the office. He further contends that the possession of the subject land has not been taken by the respondents. In the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits, the respondents are directed not to dispossess the petitioners from the lands to an extent of Ac.6.74 cents in Sy.No.1089/2 of Thatiguntapalli, H/o. Moorevandlapalli, Valmikipuram Mandal, Chittoor District, during pendency of the revision filed before the 1st respondent against the orders dated 13.07.2008 of the 2nd respondent. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 09.09.2009 Note: Furnish CC in two days B/o v v