IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19472 of 2010 DHANANJAY KUMAR, SON OF LATE RABINDRA KANT SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 24.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 379, 414, 120-B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the tractor of the Informant was stolen by unknown person. The petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and later on his name was disclosed in the confessional statement of the co-accused but there was no recovery from his possession. During investigation, it transpired that in fact, the Informant himself along with the accused persons had got this offence committed to obtain money from the Insurance Company and to grab the loan amount. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 22.4.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, in Naubatpur P.S. Case No.280 of 2008 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and 2 the other shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. It has been submitted that the petitioner is an accused in only one other case which fact would be verified by the Magistrate before releasing the petitioner on bail. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)