h ' BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARH) SjNOl.g g0 W.P. (227) No. s^"\ of 2010 PETITIONERS : 1. Jogiram S/o Kishun Satnami, aged about 55 years. 2. Nathoo Ram, S/o Hagru Satnami, aged about 55 years, 3. Shiv Nandan, S/o Juthan Satnami, aged about 45 years. 4. Dayaram S/o Kishun, aged about 65 /</y ^y ^^ ^\y Y^v .<: ^/ ^' 'y' '^" years. 5. Ram Singh S/o Jagat Ram aged about 50 years.' 6. Sukhnandan, S/o Juthan Satnami, aged about 61 years. 7. Panchram S/o Manrakhan, aged about 53 years. 8. Mayaram S/o Kishun, aged about 60 years. r-"' 9. Chandan Bai, S/o Antaram, aged about 45 years. ^' 10. Amma Bai, D/o Gayaram Satnami, aged about 40 years. 11. Kulandan, D/o Juthau Satnami, aged about 49 years. f2. Baburam, S/o Baliram Satnami, i^^ii^:^;;^—-;—-; h RESPONDENTS <OWM"/^ %J...N^ m f &.fe ^..y .. . ' '^ u^>^shikj 5 aged about 45 years. 13. Rajuram, S/o Chunuram Satnami, aged about 62 years. Occupation of all Labourer & agriculture R/oVillage Mathanideeh, P.H. No. 10, Tahsil Pandariya, District-Kabirdham at present village Birkona, Tahsil- Pandariya, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS . ^" 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through- Collector Kabirdham, Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) y 2. Collector Kabirdham, at Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) f--"" 3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Pandariya, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) 4. Tahsildar, Pandariya, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) 5. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Keshligodan, Janpad Panchayat Pandariya, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 01. Particulars about the petitioner: '<^ ^ ^ Petitioners HiGH_COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITSQN (227) PR. N0.5425 OF 2010. ^^^v ^u^4^^ Jogiram & Others '-o Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETiTSON UNDER ARTSCLE 227 OF THE CONST1TUTSON OF iNDSA (SB : Hon^bte Mr»Satlsh K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Sudhir Verma, Advocate for the petitjoners. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. 2. 3. 4. oROgSJOgAy. (Passed ori 14th day of September, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permjsslon of this Gourt to withdraw this petition wlth liberty to fije a fresh petjtion, if sp advised. Learned counsei appearing for other side has no objection. it is ordered, as prayed for. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforestated tlberty. Sd/- 1 SATISHK.AGNIHQrrai Judge . ashok ^ ^ ^^isa^^^ ^^^^^^