BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Second day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15136 of 2011 1 N.S. NAJMUDEEN 2 NASURULKHAN 3 BABU SALAM 4 KAFAR KHAN 5 S.T.N. JALAL 6 SALEEM 7 S.T.N. SHEIK DAWOOD 8 YELIASH 9 S.T.N. ABDUL RAHMAN ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 9 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANAMELKUDI POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT CRIME NO. 226/2011, ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. N.RAVISHANKAR VALLATHARAS Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are accused and they prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 324, 323, 506 (ii) I.P.C. r/w 25(A) (1) Arms Act in Crime No.226 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police. 2.Heard Mr.N.Ravishankar Vallatharasu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor(Criminal Side) appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitiones would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the injured persons had already been discharged from the hospital. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aranthangi, Pudukkotai District and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties ecah for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Aranthangi, Pudukkottai District and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days , faliing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 22/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARANTHANGI PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANAMELKUDI POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. N.RAVISHANKAR VALLATHARASU Advocate SR.No.40786 rl/6c – 25.11.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15136 of 2011 Date :22/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/