mes-i cuum‘ a? CHHATTssQARa-i: mmswg §E§§i§l§¢ 4m?££2§§;§ Lakhanta: Sudhakar‘ aged 52 vears‘ Son a‘f {ate Shri. Shyam ia§ $ucihaker: Assistant Grade ~2, Tahsil Omcs Daundi Lohara, Dig‘trmt Burg {CG‘}. Petitioner Versus gesgandents 'H State Gavemment of Chhattisgarh, ihrouqh the Secreta. I, Revenue and Apéda Prabagydhan, D‘KS, Bhavan, Raipur (CG). 2) Conestor, Durg. (Writ Petition under Artime 226 of the Ccnstitution of mciia) SB: Hon’ble Mr. Samsh K. agaiho‘kri, J. Hesent: Shri Samkant‘v’erma counse! orfhe petmoner‘ Arum Sac, Sow. Advocate for the Siate. GRAL 0mm? gassed cm this 13'" day at August; 2003} With the consent of §eamed counsel aepearing for the names, the petition is heard finaily. 2) Learned counsa appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wan? is press this petiticn on merits, at this stage, However, the petiiioner may be ‘ eermit’red to make a represenmticn before the concerned authorEties wrthin a pence of :hree davs and the same may be arrested to be consrdered and decided, in accordance with iaw, within the prescribed time. 3) Shri Amn Sac, teamed Govt. Advecate appearihg tor the State submits that if the reoresentation is made, the same shati be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period ot' two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 4i Shri Sao further submits that no coercive stes shait he taken against the petitioner, tiiithe dishosaiot’the representation. 5) t hope and trust that the StateGovernment shah examine the representation objectiveiy in accordance with iaw and guideiines, issued by the Government time to ' time $ ‘ p 5i in View of the foregoing, the oetitioh stands disposed of. No order as to costs. ~——i Sd[— . i Satish K. Agnihotri i Judge i