IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1811 of 2005 RAM LAKHAN SINGH, Son of Late Chintaman Singh, resident of Village- Ramani Bigha, P.S. Dhanarua, District-Patna....Petitioner. Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board, through is Chairman, B. S.E.B., Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Bailey Road, Patna. 3. The Joint Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Bailey Road, Patna. 4. The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Central Electric Supply, Area Board, Daroga Prasad Rai Path, Patna. 5. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Circle, Patna. 6. The Accounts Officer, Electric Supply Circle, Patna. 7. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Masaurhi, District-Patna..........................................Respondents. 03. 10.12.2009. Heard Mr. Bajrangi Lal learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Bijay Kumar Verma, Junior counsel to Mr. Binay Kirti Singh learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Bihar State Electricity Board. The writ petitioner had filed the petition for payment of his post retiral dues having retired from services of the Board with effect from 31.03.2003 of unskilled Khalasi. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 18.07.2005, a counter-affidavit has been filed in Court today after service upon the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The details of the dues paid to the petitioner has been mentioned at paragraph no. 5 of the counter-affidavit and in which it is stated that Group Saving Scheme amount of Rs. 38,783/-alongwith interest Rs. 4389/-, Leave Encashment amount of Rs. 56,628/-, D. C. R. Gratuity amount of Rs. 1,54,056/- and further sum of Rs. 56,040/-, has been paid G. P.F. amount of Rs. 1,77,526/- 2 alongwith interest of Rs. 7101/- together with interest has been paid and even Annual increment arrear of Rs. 3840/- has been paid to the petitioner. It is stated that interest on delay of payment is not admissible. It is thus submitted that the grievances of the petitioner has been redressed. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of in the light of the statements made in paragraph no.5 of the counter-affidavit with liberty to the petitioner to raise any grievance if he is aggrieved by any of the calculation. Needless to say that such representation is filed, the same should be considered and disposed of by the Secretary of the Board by a reasoned order. This writ petition stands disposed of with the directions aforesaid. U.K. (Jyoti Saran,J)