SBCWP5119/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5119/2010 Sanwar Mal Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order ::: 16.04.2010 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Nikhilesh Katara, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that petitioner was engaged under Home Based Education Programme, which is meant for developing Pre-Integration Skills in the physically disabled children, by order dated 27th October, 2009. He continued to work with respondents till 31st March, 2010, when by order Annexure-5 his services were suddenly terminated. Petitioner was engaged through placement agency and contract of present placement agency still subsists. From perusal of petitioner's termination order dated 31.03.2010 it appears that services of petitioner have been terminated as per instructions of the District Project Convener, Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan. Allegation of petitioner SBCWP5119/2010 // 2 // is that petitioner has been removed with a view to accommodating another person whereas the petitioner is trained in the field and has also acquired experience of working. The respondents might engage another person. In the facts of this case, instead of directly entertaining the writ petition, I require the petitioner to make a representation to the District Collector and Chairman of the Executive Committee, Sarva Shiksha Mission, Sikar, who shall examine grievance of petitioner emphasizing on the arguments made above, and consider giving preference to the petitioner over any other fresh hand, if the contract of the placement agency still subsists and pass a speaking order on such a premise within four weeks from the date of its making. Writ petition stands disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//