WP(C) 5593/2008 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI Heard Mr. A Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. G Soren, learned Government Advocate, for the respondents. Heard also Mr. Biren Dutta, Co mmissioner and Secretary, Urban Development Department, who is present, in perso n, pursuant to the order, dated 23-01-2009, passed in this case. Though the case was directed to be listed on 09-02-2009, it has been fix ed today on the basis of the request made Mr.Biren Dutta, who is Commissioner an d Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Assam, on the ground th at he is required to attend a meeting of the Planning Commission at New Delhi. Mr. Biren Dutta has submitted that on a close perusal of the relevant re cords, he has found that there are some discrepancies in the allotment of work t o the respondent No. 8, namely, M/S Jyoti Constro Commercial, Palashbari Municip al Board, Palashbari, Kamrup, and that the decision of the State respondents, in the matter of allotment of contract work, to the respondent No. 8, needs to be re-examined. Though, in view of the submissions noted above, this writ petition could have been disposed of giving liberty to the State respondents to re-examine the matter of allotment of contract, this Court does not propose to do so on the gr ound that direction for re-examination, if issued by this Court, may adversely a ffect the interest of the respondent No. 8. This does not, however, I must haste n to add, mean that the State respondents, on their own volution, cannot re-exam ine the matter and pass appropriate order. In view of the submissions noted above, Mr. A Sarma, learned counsel for the pet itioner, seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of on being withdrawn by the petitioner wi th liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate app lication, in future, if so advised. The interim direction passed, in this case, on 05-01-2009, shall accordingly sta nd vacated. The State respondents are left at liberty to deal with the matter of allotment o f contract, in accordance with law, which would include even re-examination of t he said allotment of work.