IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.767 of 2008 1. UDAY PASWAN 2. Uma Paswan 3. Rama Kant Paswan …..Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Lata Devi …..Opposite parties ----------- 2. 17.12.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the impugned order. On perusal of impugned order it appears that in course of the enquiry, victim has supported the allegation levelled against the petitioner. Under the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order rejecting the petition filed under Section 227 Cr.P.C.. Accordingly, this revision application is dismissed. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)