IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38874 of 2008 BAIDYANATH MUKHIYA Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 19.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. There is a land dispute between the parties. Petitioner has not been shown assailant of the deceased and some of the witnesses only named this petitioner also. Petitioner is in custody since 29.07.2008. In my view, his further incarceration is not justified. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri P.C. Verma, J.M., Ist Class, Bettiah in Jogapatti P.S. Case no. 41 of 1996 corresponding to T.R. no. 540 of 2008. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)