1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF OF OF MOTION NO.3568 OF 2006 MOTION NO.3568 OF 2006 MOTION NO.3568 OF 2006 inin in INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX TAX TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2045 of 2006 APPEAL (L) NO.2045 of 2006 APPEAL (L) NO.2045 of 2006 The The The Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner of Income Tax of Income Tax of Income Tax 18 18 18 ...... Appellant Appellant Appellant vs vs vs M/s M/s M/s Superstar International.. Superstar International.. Superstar International.. Respondent Respondent Respondent Mr.R.G.Bhat Mr.R.G.Bhat Mr.R.G.Bhat for for for Appellant Appellant Appellant Ms.Usha Ms.Usha Ms.Usha Dalal Dalal Dalal for Respondent for Respondent for Respondent CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND R.S.MOHITE, R.S.MOHITE, R.S.MOHITE, JJ JJ JJ DATED DATED DATED : 4TH DECEMBER, 2007 : 4TH DECEMBER, 2007 : 4TH DECEMBER, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1.1.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2.2.2. There is delay of 233 days in filing the above There is delay of 233 days in filing the above There is delay of 233 days in filing the above In In In Income Tax Appeal. Thereis no sufficient cause Income Tax Appeal. Thereis no sufficient cause Income Tax Appeal. Thereis no sufficient cause shown shown shown in the affidavit in support of the Notice of in the affidavit in support of the Notice of in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. Motion. Motion. Hence, delay not condoned. Motion is Hence, delay not condoned. Motion is Hence, delay not condoned. Motion is disposed disposed disposed of. of. of. (F.I.Rebello, (F.I.Rebello, (F.I.Rebello, J) J) J) (R.S.Mohite, (R.S.Mohite, (R.S.Mohite, J) J) J)