1 S.A.NO.929/2008. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. SECOND APPEAL NO.929 OF 2008. Naimoddin s/o Moinoddin Jamadar ...Appellant. Versus Bilkisbegum w/o Naimoddin Jamadar ...Respondent. ... Mr.R.B.Deshmukh, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.N.D.Kendre, Advocate for the respondent. ... CORAM: A.V.NIRGUDE,J. Date : 30th July, 2009. COURT'S ORDER: 1. The appellant is challenging the concurrent findings of the Courts below that the respondent could prove his adultery. The appellant was plaintiff in the Lower Court and sought restitution of conjugal rights. The respondent/defendant resisted successfully her claim setting up a defence of adultery. The appellant's Advocate tried to point out 2 S.A.NO.929/2008. that the Courts below did not consider the appellant's genuine offer of maintaining the respondent wife in a separate residence, he thereby indicated that in such arrangement the appellant would not have opportunity to stay with his alleged adultery partner. The offer of the appellant obviously is insincere. Despite of separate residence, the appellant would be able to continue with the adulterous relationship. The appeal, therefore, does not give rise to any substantial question of law. The appeal stands dismissed. (A.V.NIRGUDE,J.) lkp.