1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WEALTH TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2684 OF 2008 AND WEALTH TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2685 OF 2008 AND WEALTH TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2686 OF 2008 AND WEALTH TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2687 OF 2008 AND WEALTH TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2688 OF 2008 AND WEALTH TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2689 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Wealth Tax City 8, Mumbai ..Appellant V/s. M/s.Parke Davis (India) Limited, Bombay ..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant. Mr.Rajiv Singh i/by Chitnis & Co., for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 2nd July, 2009 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the revenue. There is delay of more than 800 days in filing all these appeals. Mr.Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the revenue states that no notices of motion for condoning the delay caused in filing these appeals have been taken out by the revenue. Since there are no notices of motion for condonation of delay, the appeals are liable to be dismissed as barred by limitation. 2. At this juncture, it is relevant to mention here that though there is a prayer for condonation of delay in all these appeals, but no material facts and/or particulars are disclosed in the appeal memo much less any statement is made on oath giving explanation for delayed filing of appeals. 3. In this view of the matter, for want of Notices of motion as well as sufficient and reasonable cause for condoning the delay, all the appeals are dismissed being barred by limitation with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)