C.R. No.3210 of 2010 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.3210 of 2010 (O & M) Date of decision: 15.12.2011 Nisha Walia and another .... Petitioners Versus Geetika Walia ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr.Avinish Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.K.S. Chahal, Advocate, for the respondent. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.: (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties state that the proceedings before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court have been successful and the parties to the dispute have compromised the matter. Statements of the parties have also been recorded there in this regard. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent states that respondent-Geetika Walia has been allowed to stay in the portion of the house i.e. one front Bed Room, Dining Room, Kitchen, store and bathroom as a licencee with the right to live though she has no right to make an addition, alteration or renting out the said portion of the house and cause any damage to the structure of the house. It is further stated that in view of the said statement, respondent-Geetika Walia has no grievance left in the present petition. C.R. No.3210 of 2010 (O & M) ::2:: 3. In the circumstances, learned counsel for the parties state that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. 4. Ordered accordingly. 5. It is, however, made clear that any of the parties shall be at liberty to get the present petition revived if the statements made by them are not honoured. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE December 15, 2011 sukhpreet C.R. No.3210 of 2010 (O & M) ::3::