IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33757 of 2008 RAM PRAVESH YADAV @ RAM PRAVESH JEE Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 4.9.2008 Heard. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. but there is no allegation assigned to him. The case is related to obstruction in the traffic on the G.T. Road by some activists in pursuance to a call for a Bandh. It appears that a constable was also killed on account of firing resorted to by the extremists. The name of the petitioner, besides appearing in the F.I.R., appears in one paragraph of the supplementary case diary, i.e., 74 and other paragraph is 105 of the regular case diary which contains the confessional statement of the co-accused Daroga Rai. The contention is that in the whole case diary, which contains a number of paragraphs, the petitioner is never named. Let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya, in connection with Amas P.S. case no.103 of 2007. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )