IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6693 of 2010 1. RINA KUMARI W/O SRI MUNNA SINGH R/O VILL.- RAM GARH, P.S.- CHENARI, DISTT.- ROHTAS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ROHTAS AT SASARAM 5. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LEGAL), ROHTAS AT SASARAM 6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, ROHTAS AT SASARAM 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, CHENARI (ROHTAS) 8. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, CHENARI (ROHTAS) 9. THE MUKHIYA, MALHIPUR GRAM PANCHAYAT, CHENARI BLOCK (ROHTAS) 10. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, MALHIPUR GRAM PANCHAYAT, CHENARI BLOCK (ROHTAS) 11. HEADMASTER, PRIMARY SCHOOL, RAMGARH, ROHTAS ----------- 2 17/01/2011 The impugned order has been passed by the Collector on the direction of the High Court passed in C.W.J.C. No. 1486 of 2006 dated 25.05.2007. To say the least, the findings given by the District Magistrate are alarming, if not shocking to the conscience of this Court. If this is the background the petitioner came to be appointed, the least which ought to be done is his removal, if no other follow up action. - 2 - This writ application is dismissed being devoid of merit. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)