THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.6914, 6915, 6916 and 6780 of 2006 Dated:06.04.2006 WRIT PETITION No.6914 of 2006 Between: Mirza Yaseen Ali Baig. ..... PETITIONER AND The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kandukur Mandal, Kandukur, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT WRIT PETITION No.6915 of 2006 Between: Mirza Mohd.Ali Baig. ..... PETITIONER AND The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kandukur Mandal, Kandukur, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT WRIT PETITION No.6916 of 2006 Between: Mohd. Habeebuddin Ansari. ..... PETITIONER AND The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kandukur Mandal, Kandukur, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT WRIT PETITION No.6780 of 2006 Between: Akbar Ali Khan. ..... PETITIONER AND The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kandukur Mandal, Kandukur, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.6914, 6915, 6916 and 6780 of 2006 COMMON ORDER: In all these writ petitions the petitioners acquired various extents of lands by way of purchase and gift in Survey Nos. 53, 54, 57, 58, 84/2, 409, 410, 411, 413 and 414 situated at Pulimamidi Village, Kandukur Mandal in Rangal Reddy District from D.Ramachandra Reddy, Chinna Narsimha Reddy and Late Mohd.Siddiq Ansari. They acquired the lands under unregistered sale deeds and memorandum of oral gift in 1977 and 1988. In view of the pendency of the cases before the various authorities as well as this Court arising under Section 50-B of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (for short ‘the Act’), their documents were not registered. It is their case that ultimately, the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos.10787-10795 of 1996 and batch dated 19.08.2003 dismissed the appeals, by reason of which, the validation certificates issued under Section 50-B of the Act issued by the then Tahasildar, Ibrahimpatnam, stood upheld. It is only thereafter they filed applications, in vain. Again the petitioners allegedly made applications in 2006 to the respondent seeking necessary changes in the record of rights. In these Writ Petitions, they seek a direction to the respondent to complete the enquiry and pass orders for mutation of their names in respect of the land, which they acquired. The petitioners have annexed their representations made to the respondent requesting to incorporate their names in the record of rights under the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971, and Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Rules, 1989 (for short ‘the Rules’). A person who acquires rights subsequently has to file appropriate application giving the particulars of the person from whom they acquired such rights and/or duly enclosing the documents under which they acquired those rights. The Mandal Revenue Officer is then required to conduct enquiry and take necessary decision. In these cases, the petitioners have not complied with the requirements. Therefore, instead of keeping the matters pending, these Writ Petitions are disposed of in the following manner. The petitioners are given two weeks time to file applications under Rule 18 of the Rules in a proper form. As and when such applications are filed, the respondent shall conduct enquiry as per law and pass appropriate orders for mutation of their names in the record of rights. This exercise shall be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the applications from the petitioners. No costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 06.04.2006 vs