^) 1 i. W:21i-til|GHjCgURrp£CHHA3llSG^^ Writ Petition No. 1763 of 2003 Petitioner Respondents Lunkai'aa Jata (Miaor) aged about 17 Yrs. (Through his father) Shri Shikhar Chaad Jain, aged about 45 yeai's, Son ofLate Shri Jawri Lal Jaiu, resident of House No, 81 Triiaurty Colony, Mahasainiiiid, Tahsil aiid Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) Chliattisgai'h Board of Secondary Educetion, Through The Secretar}r, C,G.B.S,E. , Pension Bara, Raipur Tahsil aad Distt. Raipiir (C.G.) T:he State of Chhatusgaiii fhiDugh The Secreta"^ Education Deptt. D.K.S. Maiitialaya Bliawaii, Raipar Tahsil aiid Distt. Raipur(C.G.) (Wnt Petiuon under Ai*ticie 226/ 227 of the Coustitutioii of India) (SB: Honl^le Shri Satish K, Agnihotri J.) Versus 1. 2. Shri Jainil Akhter Lohaai, x^dvocate for fhe petitiouer, Shri H. B. Agarwal, Senior Advocate with Ms Riaki Tamrakar, Advocate for the respodnent No. 1. Shii Shashaiik Thakur, Panel Lawyer for Oie respoiident No. 2. Thakur O R DE R (Passed on this 17th Day ofOctober, 2008) Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner, on iastructions, subinits that tiie petitioner seeks permission of this Court to wifhdraw thds petition, as wiih the passage of tmie ftus petition has beconie uitructuous. LeaiTted counsel appearmg tor fhe respondents have no objection. In view offhe above, me petitiou is disnussed as wifhdrawn, as havnig beconie iufructuous. Cousequenfly, M(W)P No. 1605/2003 is also disniissed, Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri j Judge 2. 3.