!(DfflIii8!in^L'!nm^*M '&>'*i'llr->n! •* P.S.KO' piesen Q WG5 F " 'w% IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.fSt No., Ot / 2006 PETITIONER ..^.-^ 6 1 A-""A t.^--v: ^^<w-^uU£-L ^nkalu Ram Sonpipare, S/o. Shri Dhaniram, Aged about 39 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Badekanera, Block - Kondagaon, Distt. - Jagdalpur (Bastar) (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 3wi^°F' ,x-,,;».».»-^ffl' State of Chhattisgarh & Others Through- The Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.u.) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Distt. -Jagdalpur ( Bastar) (C.G. WRLT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FQR ISSUANCE_OF SUITABLE WRIT, WRITS, DIRECTION ETC TQ DO JUSTICE 1N THE MATTER. < W6H OOURT WCHHATTTSeARH AX VELASP'Uft CTN6LE BBMCT : HON'BLE MR. SATIW K. A6NIHOTRI. J, WRTT pennoN (s.) NO. 7377 GP 2006 Petitibner '. Tukeshwaa* Prasod 9ier versus Re^ondents : State of Chhuttisgorh and others WRir PETTrtON (S.) NO. 7378 OFZQOS Petitioner Promod Kumor Tiwori versus Respondents : St<rte of Chhottisgorh and others WRTT PETFrtON (S.) N0. 7379 Op 2006 Petitioner Schdev Ram Ohruw versus Respontlents : State of Chhottisgarh flnd others WRTT PEmiON (S.) N0. 7383 OF 2006 •¥- Petitioner 5mt. Rutbara versus Respondents Petitioner ! Stoite of Chhattisgarh and others And WRTT FErmoN (s.i N0,7391 OF 2006 Ankahf Rwn Sonpipare versus Resoondents Stote of Chhattisgarh and others ^ ^ K ^S Preserrt : Mr. Anil Singh Riyput, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Sumesh Bcycy, Sovemment Advocate for the State/responden+s. ORbER Passed on 5* t>ay of January, 2007) Learned counsel appewing for •the petitioners os well as for the Stote/req>ondents jointly sutxnit thot the focta ond question of law involved in •the present batch of writ petitions we squoTely covered by the dedsion of this Court in the case of YasfHmnt Kwnar BharadMiJ vs. Munle^al CwiiwvHan. Dwy fsid awrter' . 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (5.) ^k>.4t30 of 2005 (ffopesli Kumar Verma vs. 7%e Sittls Sovf. of GfhatHsgtirti wvS cinortm^ and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15-12- 2006, pursuant to the memo doted 28-1-1995, issued by ttie Secretary, 8owd of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diplomo in Education Examination, it wos clarified that -the nomenclature of the Bosic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. hce been changed and renamed os biplomo in Educotion, i.e., t>.Ed. Accordingly, •ttie b.Ed. Certificote holders <re olso covered by the decision in Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (Sopeeh Kumar Verma vs. The Sfate ffovt. of Chhattisgarh <md wwthef) (Supra). V. 3. For tiie oforementioned reasons, •tiie writ petitions <n*e disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yadwwnt Kumcf Bhatwdweij {Swpr<^. subject to verification of the fact as to frftether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.I./O.Ed. Cert'ifjcates at their own expenses os per the circutws dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and fur'ther whether they have been paid two advonce increments or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge 1 2006 Ctl) MPTR-C6 96