IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.754 of 2009 Between: S. Shyam Sundar … Petitioner And The State of A.P., rep., by its Secretary for Home, Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: None Counsel for respondents 1&2: AGP for Home Counsel for respondents 3-6: None This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.754 of 2009 ORDER:- The petitioner, who is the de facto complainant, filed this Writ Petition on the apprehension that without proper investigation, respondent No.2 is likely to close his complaint. He has therefore sought for a Mandamus to direct respondent No.2 to issue proper notice to him before closing crime No.417 of 2007. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that after completion of the investigation, a final report was filed in the Court of the learned X Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri on 27.01.2009 treating the case as one of “lack of evidence”. In view of the above development, I am of the opinion that no relief can be granted to the petitioner in this Writ Petition. However, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by filing of final report by respondent No.2, he shall be free to file appropriate objections, if not already done, before the jurisdictional Magistrate. Subject to the above observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.949 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 19.07.2011 ES