Cr.Misc. M 30700 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 30700 of 2011 Date of decision:- 23.11.2011 Surender @ Bablu @ Shamsher Petitioner vs. State of Haryana Respondent Present: Mr.Amit Khatkar, Advocate. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Hry Mr. RN Singal, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner seeks the concession of pre-arrest bail in a case registered at the instance of Rajbir Singh that on 10.9.2011 at 9 AM, the petitioner had fired a shot at the complainant with an intention to kill him but the shot did not hit him. The petitioner had allegedly fired another shot, which again did not hit the complainant. On asking of the court,a report of F.S.L. regarding the spot inspection at the scene of crime has been produced. The observations of the report do not indicate that any bullet had hit the door or any brick of the house of the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as a matter of fact the petitioner himself had suffered a gun shot injury and a case has been registered after the petitioner sought intervention by moving a petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. in the High Court. It has been informed that the FIR lodged at the instance of the petitioner, is also being cancelled as during the course of investigation the petitioner prima facie is not found to have suffered the injury on his right arm with a fire arm. Cr.Misc. M 30700 of 2011 2 Taking into consideration the totality of the circumstances, it appears that in order to settle other scores, the petitioner and the complainant are indulging in levelling allegations against each other. Since it is a case of no injury to the complainant, the petitioner can be granted the concession of pre-arrest bail. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 5.10.2010 is hereby confirmed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioner, he will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the condition that the petitioner will join the investigation as and when required by the police and will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation. November 23 ,2011 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE