1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 317 OF 2008 Brijesh Ravindnarayan Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents. Mr. S.V. Shirshat with Mr. A. Chaubey for the Petitioner Mrs. P.H. Kantharia, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 2008 P.C.:- The grievance of the petitioner was that he was not allowed to meet the accused, who was in police custody. The accused was not allowed to have medicines, and his health was in danger, as he was suffering from diabetes. He also complained that because of the illness, he needs special food. Therefore, he had requested for home food. All these requests were turned down by the Court of Sessions for Mumbai constituted under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 on 6th February, 2008. 2. We were surprised to read the order of the learned Sessions 2 Judge, who stated that “at this stage of investigation, the prisoner could not be allowed to meet anybody, and he cannot also be allowed to have food brought from his home”. In any case, the learned counsel for the petitioner has conceded that medicines were already made available to the prisoner by the Police Authorities. He was also allowed to have an interview with the counsel yesterday. It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the police have been directed to allow him food from home, after making the requisite check of the parcel. 3. We do not think that any further directions are needed to be given. The petition is disposed of. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.A. SAYED, J.