1 192.11-apl IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 192 OF 2011 Mrs.Shobha Uttam Vetal. ... Applicant. V/s. State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. S.S.Redekar for the applicant. H.J.Dhedia, APP for the State. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. DATED : 25th July 2011. P.C. : Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. 2. This application takes exception to the order dated 25th January 2011 vide which the application made by the applicant for relaxation of the condition and for permission to enter Pune district came to be rejected. The applicant is a government servant and, at present, she is posted as Sub- Registrar in Sindhudurg district. She has been accused in C.R.No.I/280/2009 for the offence punishable under section 406, 420, 465, 468, 471, 409, 467 read with section 34 of I.P.C. alleging that while registering certain documents she has not paid entire amount in the Government Treasury and misappropriated the same. 3. While allowing the application of the applicant for grant of bail, 2 192.11-apl learned trial Court imposed condition that she shall not leave the jurisdiction of districts Sindhudurg and Thane without prior permission of the Court. The applicant, therefore, filed application for relaxation of the said condition with a prayer to allow her to enter Pune district. The trial Court rejected the said application. Therefore, the applicant is before this Court. 4. The applicant is a Government servant and permanent resident of Pune and there is no likelihood of her fleeing away. In that view of the matter, I find that the condition itself was not warranted. In any event, it is informed that the investigation is complete. In that view of the matter, no purpose would be served by putting or modifying the said condition. 5. In the result, application is allowed. The condition No.(iii) that she shall not leave jurisdiction of District Sindhudurg and Thane without prior permission of the court is quashed and set aside. However, it is made clear that the applicant shall remain present in the court as and when her presence is necessary for the purpose of the trial. (B.R.GAVAI, J.)