Single Bench IN THE mOH COURT OF CHH^TISGAREL AT BItASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. if^SZ^- OF 2004 PETmONER: 'Smt. Bismat Bai Aged about 56 years. W/0 ShriAnaad Ram Village-& Post- Bhoring Distt. Mahasamund. (C.G.) VERSTJS RESPONDBNTS: ^s^" l.State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Water Resoures Deptt. Mantralaya, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Sub-Divisional Offlcer Kodar Head Work Sub-Division Mahasamund. Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrrVTION OF INDIA TOR ISSUANCB OP A WRrT 111 TaE NATURE OF WASSDMSOS, PROHIBITION. CERTIORAM ETC OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. ! -: .+'1 •K. ^s': XI-HC—78 sn^r^ii R-) 'cT^T 3H^T »)-Hiqi IBIIIl:!:!1 llllii!; "IWl-i':: 1 •:<^ ?»!. *11NCTT thqraa W^ -'iwMtf,'an\ww,Kiwv<j< p...V:!E3;M:.-tR&%)o1)....•ff^ioo •MI^I TSq? (3?f33i^) ¥(<TOTC?fsa an^i 31/Ot/aUO^ tlle ftte yeaf-s Sbri Suiul Ottwani, Shri Aldul Agrawal, Ffl Heard. The petitioner by order of Aiuiexnre P-1 by service witii eBect.fi'oin.7 petitioner Iiad already years. Leamed coiuisel forl had subsequently taken the age of superaDnuation been enhaneed to 60 Aiixicxi.u-e R-6. Learaed cai tliat sunilai'l^^situatett^ga^ reiastated ^aiict ^assed. dated 16, )8/2Q04 ia theu-) ; Leamed couiisel £t petrtioncr bas iiot attaine^ Amiexure P-6 eveii liteul 31/03/2003. I Leamed counsel for| the State Goverruuent has I 60 years vide order Aiuiext}: I have heard learaedl cfiunsel for fhe petiUoBer. FIL. for the State. iastaat petition has chaUenged the (vliich the petitioner Was renioved Iroin pl/03/2003 on ffae groimd that tbe fhe age of superaiuiuation i.e. 55 attaluied exttre ^»Ni^<ft'r^T^^f ^r ?^itiR>i^i-i ^3iRCT:3It^t suiltBBle the petitioner submits fhaf the State decision dated 16/08/2004 whereby fit the Water Resburces DepaTtiiientIias ,. Tfac abbve order bas been filed as jiasel fbr fBe petitioifer' furfBjer'submils inen were directed 1ay ffia& <%urt t6 fae order ia accordance wifh. fhe onier ;ases also/: .;• •' :':' - •': '.'. : ;• >r fhfi •petifiouer subimts that the fthe age of60 years? as per policy vjde the petitioner has been retifed on |fhe respQndents has not dispuTed fhat siihanced fhe age of superaiuiuation to ,P-6. ::• . ., '.':' :-' , •' Muasel fbr the paTties. XI-HG—78 sn^i^ff R-iH ^iTan^iwqN? '^- K M.',' ( :<3^/<?i?y^/ ly •-T':1 t|1*i^l fliW^i 3TCT"4t<4ld4,8itl1yiS,T®l?1l'ylJ>< ^;..^^^3%&l!^.'^200 3(1^1 'tf=W ('^3^1) ?^TWflf?g 5HI^?[ —2-. Leafaed counsel petitioiier is granted libei^y to m.ake representatipn to the respondents to consider hi; goli<%?v:id.G;AaiiexuTe P-6 an^l onsuch representatk)ii being m.ade by fhe petitaGrier, the same 3a tlieeiuisofjustice-(|hul'li<- «-i^-i~ Thus, considenD.g tt>e and fiirther coasideruig ffie Uas been enliaiiced t6 60 1149/2003 vide order da petitioner is givea liberty to! and wTiw]iA?shp11 ^)R TlfTM'''3 sarae shalEtJe deGided/ ISy ffifc 29/09/2004 passed ia W.P. With fhis observatipn, chT1LlItn-41i Hi^<n1'^ ^s^ ^<^R ^T 3TRTO SII^I, fbr the peti.tipner subinits tliat if the case for reinstateineiit as per new is to be decided witllia a stipulated facts and circtmista&ces of ihe case fa^et that fhe age of superaitnuation years aad tliis Gourt in W.P. No. :ed 29/09/2004 had directed fhe respondents to reconsider tbje cases of already retired gan.g m.en, I / .••'•.- . ":• • I.' ...; • . .. . . ., ^ ....•; am of the opitiion fhat the ^uds of justice would be served if the inake detailed representation before fhe resporidents for reiiistatejnient as ger policy vide Anuexure P-6 %ifl:tin 10 days &OBI tdday?and fhe ;ejsspondelrts Hathia a further peiiod bf four weeks froiu the Teceip|( 6f sueh representation iil ttle light of change of polky vide AiBiexi^ P-6 and in the Ught ofoi^r (lated HO.1149/2003.• jfche petition is disposed of. ^^^ ^°^