IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH AUGUST 2011 / 26TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22149 of 2011(P) ---------------------- PETITIONER : --------------------- GREAT INDIA ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED, F-7, CRESCENT GARDENS, ALTHARA NAGAR, VAZHUTHACAUD ROAD, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 010, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. BY ADV. SRI. P. RAMAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE INSPECTOR OF FACTORIES AND BOILERS GRADE II (INSPECTOR UNDER BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCITON WORKERS (REGULATION AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) ACT 1996),THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER (E), (INSPECTOR UNDER BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS (REGULATION AND CONDITIIONS OF SERVICE) ACT 1996),THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 3. THE LABOUR COMMISSIONER, (INSPECTOR UNDER BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS (REGULATION AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) ACT 1996). THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. R1 TO R3 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 22149 of 2011(P) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF ORDER DATED 5/8/2011 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 : COPY OF ORDER DATED 6/8/2011 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 : COPY OF APPEAL DATED 8/8/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 : COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 8/8/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn ANTONY DOMINIC, J. `````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 22149 of 2011 P ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 17th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Aggrieved by Ext.P2 order passed under Rule 317 of the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and conditions of Service) Kerala Rules 1998, the petitioner has filed Ext.P3 appeal before the third respondent under Rule 317(4) of the said Rules. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks an expeditious consideration of the appeal. 2. Since the appeal filed by the petitioner is statutory and on account of the fact that, as a result of Ext.P2, the entire work stands suspended, I direct the third respondent to consider the appeal, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/17/08 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge