IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Writ Petition (T) No. 9118 of 2008 Date of decision: 21.4.2011. Virender Katoch and others …..Petitioners. Vs. State of H.P. & another …. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioners : Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents : Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Addl. A.G. with Mr.J.S.Rana, Assistant Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Lokinder Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Kuldip Singh, Judge (oral). The learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that the present petition is covered by judgment dated 17.3.2011 passed by a co-ordinate Bench in CWP (T) No. 9119 of 2008, following judgment dated 30.11.2010 in CWP(T) No. 8451 of 2008. It has been submitted that the impugned Annexure A-9 in the present writ petition was Annexure A-13 in CWP (T) No. 9119 of 2008 which has been quashed. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 has not denied this fact, rather he has also stated that Annexure A-9 in the present petition and Annexure A-13 in CWP (T) No. 9119 of 2008 are same. In view of the stand taken by the learned counsel for the parties, the Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? yes …2… petition is allowed. Annexure A-9 dated 16.4.2002 is quashed and set-aside. April 21, 2011. ( Kuldip Singh ), (GR) Judge.