Single gawk IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. lS) No. §2§3 Izoo9 PETITIONER : /%bd Kumar Jaishwar, S/o‘ late ’ Shri Satyanarayan Jaishwar, ‘Aged about 33 years, R/o. (Lg/37 % Village— Ranitarai, Post- Ranitarai, Tahsil— Patan, Distt.,— Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. /State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretaly, Health and Family Development Department, Office Situated at Secretariat, Raipur (C.G.) <2,i.r’“‘”The Secretary, Chhattisgar Government Health and Famil Development Department, Offic Situated at Secretariat, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Additional , Secretary, Chhattisgarh Government Health and Family Development Department, office situated at Raipur (C.G.) Chief Medical and Health Officer, District Drurg (C.G.) 2T0F THE WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 [2 CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA 9r z 1) PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER : As given above in the cause title. 2) PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS : 4 J : As given above in the cause title. a/ h y e xx HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5283 of2009 PETITIONER Vinod Kumar Jaishwar. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF WDIA M SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. A nihotri J. Present: Shri Praveen Dhurandhar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. , ORDER ORAL (Passed on 16 day of September, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instmctions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage. However, the petitioner prays that the respondent-authorities may be directed to consider and decide his representation dated 9th September, 2009 (Annexure PM), as early as possible. 2. Shri Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State/respondents submits that the representation of the petitioner as stated above will be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. I In the meantime, the State/respondents may consider‘the case ofthe person who has been transferred in place ofthe petitioner and he may also be given an opportunity to put forward his case, before considering and passing any order on the representation ofthe petitioner. 4. In View of the above, according to learned counsel for'the petitioner, 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. .i . Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge nothing survives for adjudication. Amit