IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19228 of 2010 MUNNI SHARMA @ SUDARSHAN SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 26.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail since 06.12.2009 in connection with a case initially registered under Sections 380, 307, 341, 323, 448, 427, 354 I.P.C. but when the victim died, after two months of the occurrence Section 302 I.P.C. was also added. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the injury of the victim was treated at Aurangabad and then to Ranchi but after recovery he was discharged. But subsequently his condition got deteriorated and then the family members of the victim, instead of taking the victim to Ranchi they got him treated at Daltanganj and ultimately the victim died. Hence in these circumstances the case does not come within the purview of Section 302 I.P.C. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that other similarly situated accused person Anup Sharma has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 5909 of 2010 on 26.02.2010 and the aforesaid contentions of the learned counsel for the petitioner has 2 not been controverted by the learned counsel for the State. Considering the aforesaid submissions, for the purposes of bail only, let the petitioner namely Munni Sharma @ Sudarshan Sharma be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. I, Aurangabad in connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No. 69 of 2009. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)