COURT OF CHHATTI55ARH AT BILAsHJR HIéH W. P. LSJ &o 2242 of 2005 5m. Shobha‘Kamle, aged about 42 Vears, D/o 5hri Ganpafroo Kamle, Peon, In the Office of Child Developmenf Project Officer, burg-Rural, Dist Durg, and R/o New Shankar Nugur, Near Wakr Tank, Dist Durg (MR) The Sfa'te of Madhya Pradeém, through 1'he Principal secretary, Women & Chiid Developmem Deparmem, Valiabh Bhawan, Manfmiaya, ' Bhopal. 2. The Commissioner, Women & Child Development Direcfara‘i'e, Par'yavus Bhnwan, M.P., Bhopal 3. Dist Women & Child Development Officer, Dist Durg‘ Durg, 4. The Collecior, District - Durg Permanen- $§irz¢inimma¢ Versus J 55: Han‘bie Mr. Justice sonsh K. Agnmom, Respondems if, Present: Smi. Fouzia Mirzo, Advocnfe for ihe pefi'l‘ioner. Ms. Sunita Join, Panel Lawyer for fhe Sfafe/r'espondenfs. V O R D E R (Passed an fhis 29’“ Day of March, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the pefifioner as well as for The 5fafe/respondenfs joimly submif Thai the facts and question of law involved the present writ petition are the same as to that of in W. P. No. 4693/2004 (Mom. 1w: Vs. me sme of Madhya Pradesh (new Chhattisgarh} and others}, which rifts allowed vide order dated 22.12.2oo7. 1' 2. In view» of the foregoing, the writ petition is allowed in the some terms. No order as to costs. , Sdl- . Satish K. Agnihotri Judge .