IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP(T) No.5990 of 2008. Date of Decision: 27.10.2010. Kanchan Kumari …Petitioner. Versus. State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. Whether approved for Reporting? No For the Petitioner(s): Mr.Puneet Rajta, Advocate vice Sh.K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate. For the Respondent(s): Mr.Vivek Singh Thakur, Addl.A.G. for respondents. Deepak Gupta, J.(oral) The petitioner has prayed for the following relilefs:- “(i) That the order dated 17.4.99, may be quashed and set aside. (ii) That the respondents may be directed to grant J.B.T. Special Certificate to the applicant. (iii) Respondents may be directed to produce entire records pertaining to the case. (iv) Respondents may be burdened with the cost of this application throughout.” The order dated 17.4.1999 reads as under:- “ Sub: Regarding issue of special certificates. Sir, I am directed to refer to your letter No. Shiksha (Pry)H(1)D- 6/87- dated 17.3.99 on the subject cited above and to inform 2 you that the provision relating to issue of Special Certificate is amply clear that JBT special certificate may be granted to teachers who have put in approved continuous service in primary Education Department for not less than 5 years in the Primary Education Department i.e. Government Department on the day of application are eligible for the award of special J.B.T. Certificate. Therefore, the teachers who have put in 5 or more years service in recognized schools are not eligible for the award of special JBT certificates. Yours faithfully, Sd/- Under Secretary(Edu) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh.” Now, undoubtedly, petitioner has not served with the Primary Education Department of the State. She is rendering her services to a Private institute which is only recognized by the State Government. Policy clearly entitles only those persons who are employed with the Government for the issuance of a JBT Special Certificate. There is no challenge to the policy. Hence, in these circumstances, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. With these observations, this petition stands disposed of accordingly. October 27, 2010 ( Deepak Gupta ) PV Judge.