1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 136/2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 53/2008 Nareshkumar s/o Biharilal Choudhari and others Versus Dwarkaprasad s/o Ramnath Choudhari and Ors ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Mr. B.S. Kudale, Advocate for appellants. Mr. S.S. Rathi, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 5. Respondent No.1 absent though served. PER COURT : 1 Heard. 2 Although Shri Kudale asserted that there occurred apparent error on record while passing the impugned order, when I went through the judgment and order of this Curt, I find that the learned judge of this Court has appreciated the case and has taken a view, he held that the appellants' case that when the suit land was purchased, the area occupied by the road is excluded, has not been accepted. In view of this finding, it 2 seems, the appellants are not inclined to re- concile with this finding of the Court and are trying to challenge the same through filing of this review. Such challenge is certainly beyond scope of review. So, review stands dismissed. Date : 13th July, 2010 [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] tsk/