IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.20934 of 2001 Between: 1 Sariyam Mallayya S/o.Late Singaiah R/o.Seetapagudem, hamlet of Buttayagudem Village and Mandal, W.G.District. 2 Sariyam Lasmudu S/o.Late Nagulu R/o.Seetapagudem, hamlet of Buttayagudem Village and Mandal, W.G.District. 3 Sariyam Venkataswamy S/o.Late Siramaiah R/o.Seetapagudem, hamlet of Buttayagudem Village and Mandal, W.G.District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Agent to Government W.G.District, Eluru. 2 Special Deputy Collector (T.W.), K.R.Puram, W.G.District. 3 Mandal Revenue Officer Buttayagudem Mandal, W.G.District. 4 Devarapalli Venkata Rao S/o.Krishnamma Doramamidi Village, Buttayagudem Mandal, W.G.District. 5 Devarapalli Bhujanga Rao S/o.Krishnamma Doramamidi Village, Buttayagudem Mandal, W.G.District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ one more particularly in the nature of a Certiorari calling for the records connected with the impugned order dt.28-5-2001 in S.R.A.No.21/1997 pf the Agent to Government, West Godavari District, Eluru confirming the order of the Special Deputy Collector (T.W.), K.R.Puram. W.G.District dt.14-10-97 on the unnumbered Representation dt.11-2-1997 of the Respondents 4 and 5 wrongly treating it as S.Rs.10/77,12/77 and 17/77 examine the same ands quash the said orders as illegal being arbitrary and in colourable exercise of power or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order as may be deemed fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.UDAYA BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.20934 of 2001 ORDER: When the matter has been taken up for hearing on 14-08-2008, none appeared for the petitioners and as such, the matter has been posted “for dismissal”. Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, neither learned counsel for the petitioners is present nor is there any representation on their behalf. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 21-08-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KMR}