HIQH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH: BSLASPUR l-1ti Piaintiff t!J i7 Baibhadra, S/o Faguna, aged about 50 years, Caste- Teli, R/o Village - Dokara, P.C. No. 43, Rl Circie - Kansabel, Tahsil Bagicha, Dlstrict Jashpur(C.G.) ResBondenis 1 Devmati @ Gubo Bai, D/o Lode Singh De'fendants Rautiya, Wd/o Trilochan, aged about 50 years, Caste- Rautlya, R/o Semarkachhar (Dokara), Tehsi! Bagicha, District Jashpur, (CG) 2. Paltu Sinah S/o Lode Singh. aaed about 46 years, 3. Janak Singh, S/o Lode Singh, aged about 44 vears. 4. !shVi/ar S'ngh, S/o Lode Singh, aged about 42 ysars, 5. Gopal Singh, S/o Lode Singh; aged about 40 vears. No.2 to 5 by occupation - Agricuiturist, R/o viliage Semarkachhar, P.C. No. 41, Tehsil Bagicha, District Jashpur (CG) 6, The State of Chhatiisgarh, Through the Collector, Jashpur, District, Jashpur (CG) Writ Petition under Articie 227 of the Constitution of india Prssent; Shri A.K.Prasad counse! for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Sinah. Govi, Advocate for the State. ?th tetoeer, This petition is direoted against the order dated 3.10.2007 psssed by the trial Court allowing the appiication of the defendants fiied under Section 137 ofthe Indian Evidence Act. Counse! for the petitioner submits that there is no ground on the basis of i'l/hich t'ne application ofths defendant Gouid be ailowsd. !t has been furthsr submittsd that this has been dons only to fiil up !acuna and the.defendants want certain documents to be' proved by their 'A'itnesses. Counsel for the .-2^- petitioner failed to address the Court on the illegality committed by the Sria! Court. This Court finds that the trial Court has passed the order in question after hearing counsel fpr the parties. !n the iight of above, no interference is warranted and the writ petjtion is liab.'e to be dismissed. It is accordingty dismissed. ActingChiefJustice ,^^