IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2855 of 2005 SITA RAM SINGH SON OF LATE YAMUNA SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BHAGIRATHA, P.S. DINARA, DISTRICT ROHTAS – PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 3. THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COLLECTOR, ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 5. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, KOCHAS. 6. THE PRESIDENT, ROHTAS ZILA PARISHAD SRI SATENDRA KUMAR SINGH OF VILLAGE DANWAR, P.S. DANWAR, DISTRICT ROHTAS. 7. THE ACTING HEADMASTER, RAJKIYA MADHYA VIDYALAY KOSHAS, DISTT.- ROHTAS, SRI DEOMUNI SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARASIA, P.O. KOCHAS, DISTRICT- ROHTAS. – RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2/ 17-05-2011 Heard the parties. The grievances raised on behalf of the petitioner in the present proceeding regarding construction of certain shops over the lands allegedly belonging to the Government Middle School, Kochas in the district Rohtas, are required to be examined at the first instance by the respondent District Magistrate and other functionaries of the respondent State, because this involves a disputed question of facts. The petitioner is hereby directed to appear before respondent District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram within a period of four weeks from today with a certified copy of the present order and a detailed representation, raising all 2 the grievances, which have been raised in the present writ petition. If the petitioner appears before the respondent- District Magistrate and files a representation within the time prescribed by this Court, then that should be looked into by the respondent-District Magistrate. The representation filed by the petitioner should be disposed of by a speaking order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and all other concerned persons. If some enquiry is required to be conducted for coming to the just conclusion regarding dispute raised in the present proceeding, then that should be also conducted by a competent officer under the orders and directions issued by the respondent District Magistrate. After hearing the parties if the respondent District Magistrate comes to a finding that some corrective measures are required to be taken, then such directions must be issued within a reasonable period of time. Entire exercise must be completed by the respondent District Magistrate within a period of six months from the date of appearance and filing of the representation by the petitioner. However, if the petitioner does not appear before the respondent District Magistrate within the time prescribed by this Court and does not file a representation along with a certified copy of the present order, then it shall be construed that the present writ petition filed on 3 behalf of the petitioner has finally been rejected by this Court. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the present writ petition has finally been disposed of. BTiwary/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)