IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18689 of 2010 SUNIL KUMAR S/O KAPILDEO PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 06.09.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 395,397 of the Indian Penal Code. By an order dated 8.2.2010 vide Cr.Misc. No. 41697 of 2009, the petitioner was refused bail stating therein that it was being rejected at this stage and thereafter on 24.6.2010 the matter was ordered to be listed on 8.8.2010 with the obvious intent to grant him bail on the said date. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 126/2009, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor 2 will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial so that it is concluded expeditiously. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )