IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38951 of 2010 1. SHEIKH MURTUZA 2. SHEIKH MD. HUSAIN 3. SHEIKH IMRAN 4. SHEIKH MAJANU 5. SHEIKH ZULFIKAR 6. SHEIKH MUTUZA KHALIFA 7. SHEIKH HASIM 8. SHEIKH MUSA 9. SHEIKH HASIM KHALIFA 10. SHEIKH REYAZ 11. SHEIKH EMAMUL 12. SHEIKH KUDUS 13. SHEIKH NABI HASSAN 14. SHEIKH SAJJAD 15. SHEIKH NURUL HODA 16. SHEIKH FARIYAD 17. SALIM MIAN 18. SHEIKH MUSTUFA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 30.11.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. There is case and counter-case for the incident of the same day. Petitioner no.1 is alleged for firing a shot hitting the informant, but his palm. Rest are alleged for causing assault by means of different weapons, but all the injuries, save and except, injury of Hasan Kyas informant caused by petitioner no.1 on palm are found simple and parties have compromised after resolving their differences. They come from a common ancestor. Land dispute was there. Theft is said ornamental. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of 2 Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah West Champaran in connection with Shikarpur P. S. Case No.213/2009,subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)