/ <7 S.B. fService Matterl IN THE HON'BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITIONfSI N0.^\ /2011. PETITIONER: r »^v ^:^!%^" ^-^^ K!unwar Sai, son of Mansai, aged about 29 years, Watehman, Pahadi Korwa Ashram, Mahatipur, Block Mainpat, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. versus Respcmdente 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2.'^Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department^ SargLya^ Chhattisgarh. 4T Collector, Sarguja, Distarict Sarguja, -<€lihattisgarh. - 5. Block Education Officer, Block Mainpat, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ ^ET ^N1^1'4, y>1l1-H<l<o, f^Cll^^ ^^.M.£.^.}....lfA./JM NJNdl %^N?—-...''....^.^.....^./.."../../....'..^^Q^ ^7^?t 'WF (^si{^<^r) ^^ ^T ^4i<=h ^'STT^T'^IW ^. t^TWt ^f?Tr 3?T^?r ISB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra 22.6.2011 Shri C.J. K. Rao witlil petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Pai copy. Leamed coLuisel for fl relating to claim of conte employees came up for cons^ No.2004/11 and batch of pejt of the petitioners^ this Coujrt case m those cases. He subj covered by the aforesaid ord\ On the ofher hand, tliat. the representation of due veriflcation. After going through f( W.P. (S) No.2004/11, it is at is squarely covered by petitioner is also entitled to Accordingly, it is dire^l rftprRspntation before the cd: ^i^fo^li 'wi^it ^f f^st 'ifsi^K ^^ww^ IMohan Shrivastava, J.1 [Shri Akshay Yadav counsel for the |iel Lawyer for tlie State, on advance le petitioner submits that the issue ^ctual payment to Cook and other |deration before this Court in W.P. (S) jtitions and after exaiaining the claim had directed consideration of the nits that the case of the petitioner is ;r. l^amed counsel for the State submits he petitioner would be decided alter le order dated 15.4.2011 passed in )parent tliat fhe case of fhe petitioner albresaid order. Therefore, the ±iesame direction in the case. ttie :.ed that il' fhe petitioner makes fresh A ticemed aufhority, clamiing payment ^^y^^ i ^.J. Y.!&^ XI-HC—78 '3'sr ^i^Krf^, ??tr)wi(o, f®i<ii'!:i^< *<IH<^f ^»*(tc|» W^ 200 ^TT^T'TT^' ( ^3^^) ^n^r ^r f^rw ^qf 'STT^T »»^ic^ '^nw^ri^f ^TT^T ^ tt Praveen of minimum wages applicab Chhattisgarh Civil Service the same shall be disposed period of eight weeks representation. In the event would be at liberty to file wrr |[e to a contract employee under the pontract. Appointment) Rules, 2004, (of in accordance with law, witJiin a £(-om the date of submission of 1 of any adverse order, the petitioner petitiona&'esh. With the aforesaid dtre^tion^ fhe petltion is tlnally disposed of. cni^f<n4ti HTH^ifil 1:^:st'<f^^i< i? •aff^iT 3T?^r Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge