1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.25 OF 2009 Shalaka Swapnil Thite ..Applicant V/s. Swapnil Dattatraya Thite ..Respondent Mr.Rahul Nerlekar, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.Sandeep Naik i/b.M/s.M.V.Vechalekar & Co., Advocate, for the Respondent CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 16TH JULY, 2010 P.C. . This is an Application by wife for transfer of PA No.1104/2008 pending before the family Court, Pune to family Court, Mumbai since the Applicant-wife is staying in Mumbai. The Respondent-husband has strong objection to this transfer from the family Court, Pune to family Court, Mumbai. He further states that the Applicant could also travel to Pune since the distance between Pune and Dadar is not much. On the same analogy the Respondent 2 could travel from Pune to Mumbai since the distance would not change either ways. Additionally the Respondent-husband has stated in his reply that his wife is suffering from mental disorder. If that be so why take risk ? It will be convenient for the Respondent-husband to travel from Pune to Mumbai rather than for the wife to travel from Mumbai to Pune for contesting the Application. 2. In view of this, Miscellaneous Civil Application is allowed. PA No.1104 of 2008 is transferred from family Court No.5, Pune to family Court No.3,Mumbai, where M.J.Petition No.C-75 of 2009 between the same parties is pending before family Court No.3, Mumbai. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)