ITA No. 937 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. ITA No. 937 of 2008 Date of decision 22 .4.2010 Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad ... Appellant Versus M/s Porrits and Spencer (A) Ltd. ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Ms. Urvashi Dhugga ,Advocate for the appellant Mr. Santosh Aggarwal, Advocate and Mr. A.C. Jain, Advocate for the respondent 1.To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 2.Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? M.M.KUMAR, J. The Revenue has challenged order dated 20.3.2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, Delhi in ITA No. 1269/DEL 2007 in respect of the assessment year 1991-92. The Tribunal in its order has upheld the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (A), Faridabad dated 5.1.2007 deleting the penalty on various grounds. However, the question whether the penalty is imposable under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been rendered academic because the basic question whether the transaction for purchase and sale of 25 lakhs unit of 'US 64' were speculative loss or bonafide transaction entered into as a part of tax planning has been answered by this Court in the appeal filed by the assessee being ITA No.10 of 2004 decided on 31.3.2010. Once the aforesaid factual position is prevailing the question of imposition of penalty would not arise at the first place. ITA No. 937 of 2008 2 In view of the above, the appeal fails and the same is accordingly dismissed. (M.M.Kumar) Judge (Jitendra Chauhan) 22.4.2010 Judge okg