IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. Writ Petition No. 936 of 2004 (M/B) Smt. Shahida Praveen, W/o Sri Shaeed Ahmed, R/o Village Rampur Kalan, P.S. Sahaspur, District Dehradun. ………. Petitioner Versus State of Uttaranchal & others. ………. Respondents Mr. Arvind Vahsishth, learned counsel for behalf of the petitioner. Mr. D.K. Sharma, learned Government Advocate for the State. Coram: Hon. V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J. Hon. Irshad Hussain, J. Date: 23rd September, 2004 (Per Hon’ble the Chief Justice) 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Arvind Vashishth, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D.K. Sharma, learned Government Advocate for the state. 2. Petitioner is challenging the First Information Report dated 19.7.2004 for the offence under Sections 147, 336, 332, 353, 225, 504/34 I.P.C. and under Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment at police station Sahaspur, District Dehradun. All these are petty offences. The petitioner, if so feels apprehensive, may go and surrender before the concerned Magistrate and apply for bail. The Magistrate shall consider the bail application, if made, without any waste of time. 3. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (Irshad Hussain, J.) (V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J.) 23.09.2004 23.09.2004 G