IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE 0NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 8484 of 2008 Between: M/s. Sangam Deluxe Theatre Domakonda Nizamabad Dist Rep.by its Proprietor, Sri P.Sudarashan,S/o.Late P.Pentaiah Musheerabad Hyd ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Employee's Provident Fund Organization Rep.by its Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Sub-Regional Office Nayalkal Road Nizamabad 503001 2 Employee's Provident Fund Organization Rep.by its Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Enforcement) Sub Regional Office Nayalkal Road Nizamabad 503001 .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to call for the records from the respondents and issued an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that the exparte order passed by the 1st respondent in proceedings No.AP/SRO/NZB/ENF/21295/7A/2007/832 dt.5-10-2007 and subsequent prohibitory order passed by the 2nd respondent proceedings AP/SRO/NZB/ENF/21295/7A/2007/1355 dt.28-2-2008 as illegal unjust contrary to law arbitrary in violation of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 21 of the constitution of India and grant all consequential benefits and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.K.JAYAPRAKASH RAO Counsel for the Respondents: MR.R.N.REDDY (SC FOR EMPLOY'S PF ORG.) The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.N. Reddy, learned Standing Counsel representing the respondents and with their consent, the matter is taken up for final disposal. Subject to the condition that the writ petitioner deposits a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) on or before 21-05-2008 before the 1st respondent – Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Nizamabad and submits a detailed representation as to how he is not liable to be mulcted with the responsibility or accountability for the demands raised against him, no further steps may be taken against the petitioner including initiation of any coercive steps. The petitioner will furnish such material along with his representation so as to enable the 1st respondent to reconsider the entire matter. With this, the writ petition stands disposed of. ---------------------------------- Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J Dated: 18-04-2008 ks ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 Regional Priovident Fund Commissioner, Employee's Provident Fund Organization, Sub-Regional Office Nayalkal Road Nizamabad 503001 2 Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Enforcement) Employee's Provident Fund Organization ,Sub Regional Office Nayalkal Road Nizamabad 503001 3 2CD copies