jpc appp378-11.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 378 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.595 OF 2011 Ravi Chaitnya Varma and another ... Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent And: Mr. Prakash Gajanan Rane .. Intervenor Advocate i/by M/s ALMT Legal for the applicants Mrs. G. P. Mulekar, APP for the State Mr. A. A. Kocharekar for the Intervenor CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 27th July, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. Neither the Additional Public Prosecutor nor the learned advocate for the applicants has any objection. 3. The intervenor is allowed to remain present through his advocate at the time of hearing of the anticipatory bail application and make submissions, opposing the same. 4. The application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (A.M. THIPSAY, J.)