THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.C.Nos:1144, 1145, 1146, 1147, 1148 and 1149 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: In this batch of contempt cases the grievance of the petitioners is common. They have approached this Court by filing individual writ petitions alleging that the benefit of loan waiver scheme was not extended to them. In the miscellaneous petitions filed by them, interim orders were passed directing that the respondents shall process the applications of the petitioners for extension of benefit with reference to rescheduling of loans. The grievance of the petitioner is that steps, as directed by this Court, are not taken and that the society, from which they have borrowed the loans, is insisting for payment of amount. The third respondent filed counter affidavits. It is stated that in pursuance of the interim directions issued by this Court, they have forwarded the proposals in respect of the petitioners on 6.09.2009 to the NABARD and further steps, at that level, are awaited. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the third respondent. The interim direction issued by this Court was as regards the processing of applications. The third respondent has since been forwarded the applications. Therefore it cannot be said that there was any lapse on its part. The final decision has to be taken at a different level. In case, the concerned society is demanding any amount, the petitioners have to file necessary miscellaneous petitions. Therefore, the Contempt Cases are closed leaving it open to the petitioners to file miscellaneous petitions seeking further relief with reference to their existing grievance. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ (L. Narasimha Reddy, J.) 5th October, 2009 Js.