iri'll'U'li-l'li-UihWitWtea*'* r '~"'i>. '^yy HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No. 400 of'2006 Petitioner Q> Sushila Bareth, HV/o Ram Gopal, Agcd about 25 Ytear, K/o villagc KuiEiIiarika!a, Tebsil Chainpa, District Jaajgir -Chaaipa (C.G.) Versus Respondeats l. State of Chliattisgarh, fhrugh Sccrctardcparttncnt of cliild & vvomea development, RaipurjC.G.) 2. The Additional CoUecfor, Jaajgu:- Chaiapa Uistrict - ijaajgir -Chainpa (C.G.) 3. T'be Chief Executive Of&cer, Ekikrit Bal Vikas Pariyojna, Bamhanidih, District - Jaiygir-Champa. 4. 'l'bc 1'ioicct Officcr, Bkikrit Bal Vikas Pariyojana, Bainliaoidih., District- Janjgir-Champa. 5, The (jrasi Panchayat Kumhariteala, fhrou.gh Sarpanch,, Gram Panchayat KumharikaSa, Tchsil - Champa, District Janjgir -Chainpa. 6. Ssat. Kajkumari, agcd 2S ycars, W/o Shri Rainphal Chouhau, R/o Kiunharjkajla, Tehsil - Chaiapa, District - -Janjgir-Champa, Sit^e Sesefa : Hon'blc ?»Ir. Justice gatislt K. Agailistri. Shri Shailendra Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Auju Ahuja, Dcputy Govt. Advocate for tbe rcspondcnts No. l & 2. QRDER (Passed on this 13d1 Day ofApri!, 2007) 1. 2. The petitioner has ffled M{C)P No. 1351/2006 for condonation of delay in filing M.C.C. No. 400/2006 fbr restoration of W.P.No. 992/2004. Por the reasoas stated in the application, it is ordered as prayed for. The delay in f3iag M.C.C. No. 400/2006 is coadoned. Learaed counsel for the petitioner submits that fhe counsel for fhe petitioner could not appear on account of bonafide nustake, there&re W.P. No. 992/2004, wfaich was dismissed on 24.4.2006, be rcstored to its fite. 4. •sakur ^ Reasouabfc and sufScieut cause has beeu shown. W.P. No. 992/2004 be restored to the onginat filc, subject to payment of a ^. cost of Rs. 150/- by the applicaat, to tfae High Court Legal Aid Committee. A copy ofthis orier be placed on record ofW.P. No. 992/2004 and ttie same be listed for hearing. — Satish K. Agnihotri Judge