1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.II BAIL APPLI NO.6612/2010 Laxman @ Shahrukh Vs. State Date of order : 15/7/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Vinay Pal Yadav for the petitioner. Shri Amit Punia, P.P. for the State. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Learned counsel submits that statement of three more witnesses have been recorded, who have not given any concrete evidence against the petitioner. However, the trial court is proceeding and is likely to be concluded because after rejection of first bail application of petitioner on 17.5.2010, statement of four more witnesses have been recorded. Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. However, keeping in view the fact that petitioner is required in jail for some time, it is expected of the trial court to expedite the trial. The bail application is accordingly dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/