WP(C) 1375/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Hazarika, lear ned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.3 to 5 and Mr. R. Sarma, learned Ad dl. A.S.G.I. appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 3. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that though h e applied for renewal of his passport issued to him, nothing has been done by th e respondent authorities as the required police verification report has not been submitted by the Superintendent of Police, Dibrugarh. The respondent No.4 in the affidavit-in-opposition filed, more particula rly in paragraph 9(ix) thereof, has stated on oath that the required police veri fication could not be done due to non-availability of the petitioner at the give n address. It has also been stated in the said affidavit that if the petitioner visits the office of the Superintendent of Police, the necessary verification wo uld be done and the required report would be submitted/forwarded to the concerne d authority. Mr. Rahman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, in view of suc h stand taken by the respondent No.4 in the affidavit-in-opposition has submitte d that the present writ petition may be disposed of directing the Superintendent of Police to make the necessary verification on petitioner’s appearance before the said authority and to submit the report. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Dibrugarh by 30.0 5.2011, who shall, upon making necessary verification, submit necessary report t o the concerned authority with a period of 1(one) month thereafter. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.