HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA W.P.No.18023 of 1999 Dated 9th day of April, 2007 Between: The A.P.S.R.T.C. rep. by its Managing Director, Mushirabad, Hyderabad .. Petitioner And The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, A.P. Hyderabad, rep. by its Presiding Officer and two others .. Respondents O R D E R: The petitioner, which is the State Road Transport Corporation represented by its Managing Director, is questioning the Resolution dated 2.11.1994 passed by the 2nd respondent-Regional Transport Authority, Visakhapatnam by which there is a variation of route from Mangavaram to Pentakota by way of extension. In fact, against the Resolution, the petitioner preferred a revision before the 1st respondent-State Transport Appellate Tribunal, along with a petition to condone the delay of 185 days in filing the revision, however, the 1st respondent dismissed the application. Hence, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. Having heard the learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material placed on record, this Court is of the view that the variation of route from Mangavaram to Pentakota is within the exclusive powers of the 2nd respondent-Regional Transport Authority, whose Resolution dated 2.11.1994, needs no interference. Hence, the writ petition is devoid of merits, and accordingly, the same is dismissed. No costs. ________________ 09.04.2007 bcj