THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11760 of 2007 ORDER: Respondent No.3 is said to have constructed a building in Plot Nos.575 and 577 of Vanastalipuram, Hyderabad adjoining the premises of the petitioner in Plot No.578. It is stated that the construction was made without permission and though the petitioner submitted a representation, dated 01.06.2007, respondent Nos.1 and 2 have not taken any steps. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2. In the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.1, it is stated that the construction made by respondent No.3 is without permission and an application has since been filed claiming the benefit under the Scheme contained in G.O.Ms.No.901, dated 31.12.2007. The G.O. itself mandates that whenever an application is made for the benefits thereunder, the local authority shall not take any punitive action vis-à-vis the construction. The petitioner can submit his objections to the claim made by respondent No.3. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to submit his objections or claims vis-à-vis the application submitted by respondent No.3 for regularisation of the unauthorised construction. Respondent No.1 shall take the same into account whenever the application of respondent No.3 is considered. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated:16.11.2009 kdl