IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM MONDAY, THE 1ST AUGUST 2011 / 10TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20831 of 2011(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- NIZAR,S/O.MUHAMMUD BASHER,AGED 39 YEARS, NIZAR MANZIL,KADAKKAL P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.ZIYAD SRI.SANU.S.PANICKER RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. S.I OF POLICE VENJARAMOODU POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 695 001. 2. C.I OF POLICE, VENJARAMOODU POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 695 001. 3. S.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR, KOCHUKARIKATHIL VEEDU, MITHIRMALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS BY ADV.T.R.HARIKUMAR (R3) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 20831 OF 2011 ------------------------ Dated this the 1st day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. We have heard Sri. Sanu.S.Panicker learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.T.R.Harikumar who has taken notice on behalf of the 3rd respondent. 2. Having regard to the submissions addressed, we are of the view that the petitioner's remedy, even if he has any grievance regarding violation of the directions issued by this court in Ext.P4 order to maintain status quo, lies not in the present jurisdiction. Permitting the petitioner to pursue other remedies available to the petitioner in other jurisdictions, we decline the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 and dismiss the writ petition. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE dpk