1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO.2529/2009 WITH CA NO.9572/2008 (Mahadeo Anjanrao Kachgunde Vs. Smt. Shila w/o Sanjay Mali and Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.SB Ghute, Advocate for the appellant; Mr.SG Argad, Advocate for Resp.Nos. 2 to 5; Mr.RB Bhosale, Adv. h/for Mr. SL Kulkarni, Adv. for R.No.6. ________ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 23 rd March, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) Grant of award for Rs.3,67,000/- in MAC No.67/2005 dated 6th June, 2006, is questioned by the original respondent no.1. 3) During the course of submission, it was informed that the appellant(original respondent - Mahadeo) was not served. Consequently, at the instance of learned Counsel, papers were called and on perusal thereof, it is evident, that during shuffling of the files from Court at Ambejogai to Majalgaon, there was a valid communication to Respondent - Mahadeo, the appellant. 4) The learned Judge has analyzed the evidence, considering age of deceased 2 Sanjay, applied multiplier of 18, the treatment expenses being proved by Exhibits-29 to 59 are also evaluated and the Award is for Rs.3,67,000/-. The exoneration of the insurance company was also properly explained in paragraphs 12 and 13 of the order. 5) In the result, the First Appeal is sans merit, it is dismissed. CA dismissed. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/fa2529.09