IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16337 of 2008 1. SAGAR SINGH @ RAM SAGAR PD.SINGH, SON OF LATE RAGHUNATH SINGH. 2. RAMAKANT SINGH @ RAMAKANT PRASAD SINGH, SON OF RAM SAGAR SINGH. 3. PRASHANT KUMAR, SON OF RAMAKANT PRASAD SINGH. 4. RABRI DEVI, WIFE OF RAMAKANT PRASAD SINGH. 5. BIPIN SINGH @ VIPIN KUMAR, SON OF RAM SAGAR SINGH. 6. CHANDRAMA DEVI, WIFE OF RAM SAGAR SINGH. 7. MURARI SINGH @ KRISHNA MURARI, SON OF SITA RAM SINGH. (ALL RESIDENTS OF MALDAH, P.S. BARBIGHA, DISTRICT SHEKHPURA). ... ... PETITIONERS. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SNAGITA DEVI, WIFE OF SACHACHIDANAND SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MALDAH, P.S. BARBIGHA, DISTRICT SHEKHPURA. ... ... OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 29.6.2010. Seven petitioners, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have prayed for quashing of order dated 17.3.2008 passed in Complaint Case No.282(C) of 2007 by Shri D.K. Jaiswal, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Shekhpura. By the said order, the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of offence under Sections 147, 323 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Shri Onkar Nath, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has argued that the complaint petition was filed in retaliation of filing an F.I.R. by one of the accused of the present case against 2 N.H./ husband of opposite party no.2/complainant and other accused persons. By referring to Annexure-5 to the petition, which is a medical report, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 is a blind man and so far as petitioner no.5 is concerned, he is an Engineer and at the relevant time, he was posted at Banglore and there was no occasion to remain present at the time of alleged occurrence. However, after some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all the pleas, which have been taken in the present case and also other grounds, if available to him at the appropriate stage. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as indicated above. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)