IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 19TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 28TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 34892 of 2010(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- CHITRA SEBASTIAN, CHITRANJALI, PRIYADARSINI ROAD, KOTTAKKUNNU, SULTHAN BATHERY, WAYANAD, KERALA-673592. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE AND DEVELOPMENT, ROOM NO.302 C, SASTHRI BHAVAN, WING GATE NO.I, CANNAUGHT PLACE, NEW DELHI-110001. 2. NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL TESTING(NET) BUREAU, UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION, 9, BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG, NEW DELHI-110001, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION, 9, BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG, NEW DELHI-110001, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. ADV. SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC FOR R2-R3 SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.SOLICITOR FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 34892 of 2010 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF NEWS REPORT WHICH APPEARED IN INDIAN EXPRESS DAILY DATED 14.10.10 EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF NEWS REPORT WHICH APPEARED IN MATHRUBHUMI DAILY DATED 21.10.10 EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 21.10.10 EXT.P4- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT TO THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 21.10.10 EXT.P5- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 26.10.10 EXT.P6- TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MINISTER FOR HUMAN RESOURCES AND DEVELOPMENT DATED 26.10.10 (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).34892/2010 .............................................. Dated this the 19th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT It is submitted that pursuant to Ext.P4 application made by the petitioner under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, the marks secured by the petitioner in the NET Examination were furnished. If that be so, the grievance substantially stands redressed. The writ petition is accordingly closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs