IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 21ST APRIL 2009 / 1ST VAISAKHA 1931 WP(C).No. 12566 of 2009(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SAFIA A.BENGARA W/O. ABOOBACKER, CHOORI, POST RAMDAS NAGAR, KUDALU, KASARAGOD-671 125. BY ADV. SRI.T.B.SHAJIMON SMT.GOVINDU P.RENUKADEVI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, THE KASARAGOD PRIMARY CO-OP. AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD., NO.F.F.113, KASARAGOD. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES GENERAL, KASARAGOD. 3. THE SPECIAL SALE OFFICER/ SENIOR INSPECTOR, THE KASARAGOD PRIMARY CO-OP. AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD., NO.F.F.113, KASARAGOD. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. R. LAKSHMI NARAYAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 12566 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 21st April, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges the proceedings initiated by the respondents for recovery of amounts due from the petitioner. Ext. P6 proclamation for sale of immovable property of the petitioner has been issued , which is under challenge in this writ petition. 2. I am not inclined to consider the contention of the petitioner on merits since the petitioner had already approached this Court twice and obtained interim orders in respect of the same amount. After obtaining the interim order, the petitioner failed to comply with the conditions of the interim order. In fact, first time, on the ground that conditions in the interim order has not been complied with in W.P(C) No. 13546/2005, by Ext. P 3 judgment, a learned Judge of this Court has dismissed the writ petition itself. The petitioner filed another writ petition, viz. W.P(C) No. 11471/2006 in which Ext. P3 interim order has been passed on condition that the petitioner pays an amount of Rs. 3 lakhs on or before 30-4-2006. Admittedly, the petitioner has paid only Rs. 1 lakh. That writ petition is still pending also. In the above circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled to any further indulgence in the matter. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.