IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7955 of 2000 Between: M/s.Sainath Service Station, Rep. Proprietor Smt.P.V.Anitha, W/o. P.V.Ashok Kumar, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Union of India, Ministry of Petroleum & Natrual Gasses. Rep. Secretary, New Delhi. 2 Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Rep. Chairman. Scope Complex, Core-2, 7, Industrial Area, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110 003. 3 Govt., of A.P. Rep. Secretary. Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate one in the nature of Particularly in Writ of Mandamus writ, order or direction declaring clause 3(iii) of Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel (Prevention of Malpractise in supply & Distribution) Order, 1998 in so far it insists that the dealer shall ensure that the quality of product shall conform to the requirements of Schedule-I as being illegal, unconstitutional and ultravires and strike down the same and further declare the proceedings of the 2nd respondent issued in No.SDO/R/1027 dated 27/04/2000 as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and pass such other suitable order as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.V.MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Division Bench of this Court made the following : Order follows 2nd page THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7955 of 2000 O R D E R : (Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) Sri Satish, the learned counsel representing Sri C.V.Mohan Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission accorded. 3. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. ________________________ JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI. ____________________________ JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY. 13-3-2009. I s L ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VR}