ash 1 ao-160.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 160 OF 2010 Shri Shripati Laxman Nanekar & Ors. .. Appellants Vs Shri Baburao Shripati Nanekar & Ors. .. Respondents -- Shri Vilas B. Tapkir for the Appellants. Shri S.D. Patil for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. -- CORAM ; A.S. OKA, J DATED : 9TH FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C. . Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. The submission of the learned counsel appearing for the Appellants is that the order impugned is sought to be misinterpreted and misconstrued as regards Item Nos.2 and 3 of Clause (c) of Paragraph 1 of the Plaint. He submitted that the impugned order does not prevent the Appellants from carrying on business of running a brick-kiln and business of selling building materials under the name and style of “Prasad Enterprises”. He submitted that the impugned order will have to be clarified to that extent. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents states that the Respondents have never misinterpreted the order of the Trial Court. He, however, states that necessary clarification ash 2 ao-160.10 may be issued. 2. The Appeal is disposed of by passing the following order. ORDER (i) The impugned order is confirmed. (ii) It is clarified that the impugned order does not prevent the Appellants from carrying on business of running a brick-kiln i.e. Business of manufacture and sale of the bricks. It is also clarified that the impugned order does not prevent the Appellants from carrying on business of selling the building materials under the name and style of “Prasad Enterprises”. It is however made clear that the action of the Appellants will be subject to final outcome of the suit. (iii) Hearing of the suit is expedited. ( A.S. OKA, J )