IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 16TH JANUARY 2009 / 26TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 18807 of 2008(L) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. JIJI PHILIP, MUTTATHUPADAM, VILLOONNI POST, KOTTAYAM. 2. JIMMY PHILIP, ...DO..DO..... BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, THE KOTTAYAM CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD.NO.K.48, POST BOX NO.198, KOTTAYAM. 3. THE SPECIAL SALE OFFICER, THE KOTTAYAM CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. NO. K. 48, POST BOX NO.198, KOTTAYAM. 4. CHACKO PHILIP, MUTTATHUPADAM, VILLOONNI POST, KOTTAYAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.18807 of 2008-L = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 16th day of January, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioners, debtors of the second respondent, even going by the materials on record, repeatedly obtained judgments of this Court in relation to the loan transaction. The last among them was Ext.P20 issued on 12-12-2007. That was issued on the submission that the petitioners may be given a breathing time to pay off the remaining amounts and a direction to the bank to consider whether any reduction in the total amounts could be granted. Following that judgment, the bank issued Ext.P21 on 30-1-2008, stating that under the two transactions, the amounts to be paid are as stated in Ext.P21. It is also stated therein that deductions as stated in that document are being extended to the petitioners. Criticizing that, this writ petition was filed on 11-4-2008. The WP(C)18807/2008 -: 2 :- petitioners had not been able to obtain any order from this Court till now. As of now, the property has been brought to sale. Additional documents are placed on record along with I.A.714 of 2009 showing that the sale is listed. I do not find any ground to interfere with Ext.P21. It vividly states the total outstandings and deductions available in the two accounts. Further, elaborate description how the credits have been given is a matter that the petitioners can easily understand if they would approach the bank for any lack of clarity in Ext.P21. There is no ground made out for judicial review of the contents of Ext.P21 issued way back on 30-1-2008, at least, for interfering with the impugned sale proceedings. The writ petition fails. The same is accordingly dismissed. I.A.714/2009 is also dismissed. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/200109