IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 8321 of 2011 Date of Decision : October 11, 2011 Smt. Ranjna Devi … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & another … Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R. K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for respondents-State. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner claims the benefit of ad hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in her favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State H.P, decided on 15.7.2010. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioner submits that she would file an appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for her to do so. 2 3. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents concerned to examine the matter, after verifying the facts, in the light of the judgment, referred to above and take appropriate action thereon, within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment, referred to above. 4. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. October 11, 2011 (PK/C)