IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23808 of 2009 RAHUL @ RAHUL KUMAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. PURNIMA KUMARI @ GUDIYA ----------- 2 08.09.2009 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Section 366A of Indian Penal Code. According to the F.I.R., he initially allured the minor daughter of the informant and subsequently kidnapped. The girl, on her return, made statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. on 13.4.2009. This court finds from her statement that there is allegation of kidnapping and misbehaviour as well on the part of the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that the victim and the petitioner were in love and he is still prepared to marry with her. Considering the statement made by the girl under Section 164 Cr.P.C. (Annexure-2) and also the fact that she is minor, this court is not persuaded to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer is, accordingly, rejected. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )