IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10701 of 2009 NANDLAL KEBAT S/O LATE RAMJEE KEBAT, VILLAGE + P.O. SAHAJA, P.S. & BLOCK PRANPUR, DISTRICT KATIHAR ….. PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. COLLECTOR, KATIHAR 3. D.D.C., KATIHAR 4. MUKHIYA, SAHAJA GRAM CHAINCHOUT RAJ, VILLAGE SAHAJA, P.S. PRANPUR, DISTRICT KATIHAR 5. SARPANCH, SAHJA GRAM PANCHAIT RAJ, VILLAGE SAHAJA, P.S. PRANPUR, DISTRICT KATIHAR 6. PANCHAYAT (SECRETARY) CHAINPUR, SAHJA, GRAM PANCHAYAT, VILLAGE SAHAJA, P.S. PRANPUR, DISTRICT KATIHAR 7. MD. IMAMI SON OF MD. MURTAJ, VILLAGE KASTAHABER, P.S. MANSAHI 8. MD. KAISH SON OF ABDUL BELAL, VILLAGE KASTAHABER, P.S. PRANPUR, 9. ASHOK MANKAL SON OF LATE GODHI MANDAL, VILLAGE & P.S. GHAUYA, P.S. PRANPUR MANSAHI, DISTRICT KATIHAR 10. BIRENDRA KUMAR MANDAL SON OF RAGHUNATH MANDAL, VILLAGE GHAUYA, P.S. PRANPUR, DITRICT KATIHAR 11. RAJ KUMAR KEBAT SON OF PRIYAG KEBAT, VILLAGE SHAHAJA, P.S. MANSAHI 12. EBRAHIM SON OF GORTU KALU VILLAGE EM, P.S. MANSAHI, DISTRICT KATIHAR 13. PRAKASH SHAH SON OF LATE MOHAN SHAH, VILLAGE SAHAJA, P.S. MANSAHI, DISTRICT KATIHAR …. RESPONDENTS ----------- 2. 25.8.2009 Heard the Counsels appearing for the parties. The prayer in this writ application is for issuing a direction to respondent nos.2 to 6 to ensure proper distribution of essential food grains. It is stated that a representation has been made before the second respondent i.e. Collector, Katihar without expressing any opinion on the merits of the contentions raised, we call upon the second respondent i.e. Collector, Katihar to consider the representation and take any appropriate remedial measures, if necessary, as 2 expeditiously as possible. With the above observation, this writ application is disposed of. Narendra/ ( P. K. Misra, CJ. ) ( Anjana Prakash, J. )