PETITIONER Swat WW Mohd. Salim Siddique, s/o. Late Shri Abdul Razzaque, Ageg about 35 years, Occupation v service, Presently working as Tracer, Office of the Collector, Land Records, Rajnandgaon, R/o. Balgovind Chowk, Rajnandgaon, Dist.Rajnandgaon(C.G). WRIT PETITION no.4b38 [2004 State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Land Records, Raipur (C.G) Collector, Land Records, Raipur (C.G) N.K. Lala, S/o. Shri Ravindra umar, Aged about 4O years, Tracer, Office of the Collector, Land Records, Raipur, R/o. Jamatpara, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) “If PETI$ION UNDER MICIE 226 OF‘ ‘EwE CON$¥ITUTION GE' IMDE§;}K5I IS$UKNGE ($F r&1f IHN r§u§ NEEURE ‘MF Em£rIBITrmN END FOR OEHER CEREIORARI t§neenlK§ SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, own OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS "i ‘ ’\<,-,«.ry< above named, respectfully submits as under :~ The petitioner, most humbly and K ‘ ‘ ‘ ' CQ Sii «’9§h$§ mgi IN RIH G CORI U OE JUDIAURE CI AI EILASPUR (C.G) . WRIT ymnxon 438 [204 no.0 0 PTE ETIIONR S ‘ ,WA hc a ai ’isgh e uppls mte6. ipu (C - .s ua m a' x The petitioner, rectfully submits spe a W F; . @ W RESPGNDENE \ &sk shme: @man whattar Weat civil Sie wrporaricn Lii Rar .$.). wan nitIrma: man A 01' man ran xsmmd mmxo’mx, mauvs,\ sn-mm war on mns Dmcwons ‘ \ ——-—-———-—__ 23 'é ‘1 M HE§H CaURT QF JU£E€AT§JR§ CHHATTESGARH: 3IEASPUR single gamih: Haii’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotti, J. W. E E9. 4-038 9f 2004 PEiia‘ener Mohd. Salim Siddique. V€rsus Rapmidsais : State Gf Chha‘ttisgaxh 85 Others , .n’l‘ Smt Fouzia Mima, Advocate for the petih'oner. Smt, Agju Abuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate fm‘ tha State/ rsspondents No. 1 to 3. Shm' N.K. Vyas, Advocate for respondent No.4. 8hri A%)hishek Shanna, Advocate fer respandent No.5. am GREER {27th gay, 9905; 1, The peiifigner 311$ Mahd. Sah‘m SidiHque, Tracer; Office. ef fhe Ccaectm", Land Recm‘ds, Rajnemdgaml, was h*msfe11ed t0 i11e Qifme af me. Cellectm‘, Land Records, Dantewada, by impagnetd arder (lated 18-10-2GG4 {Annexure-P/ 1) m1 the graund of administrative exigency. ;g» The petitioner iias flled this petiticm hueugaing the Ql‘cier dated 18- 13-2004 (Anaemu‘e-P/ 1) 033 the ground that this order was 33a$sed i3 exercise of mala fide powei" on the. baeis of letter dated 13-7-2q04 {Aimexure-PfQ) written by 011E: Shri Ashok Shanna (res§o11dent No5}. 3. E have. heard leagied counse} for the paities and examioed the note sheet submitted by the leanied‘counsel appearmg for the State, the same was shown to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioriei; 3km. Upoe perusal of the note sheethrit is evident that the process of transfer of the petitiooegetartfégt on 1G—2-2004 @ ah4 whieh culmiilamd iiito tremsfa‘ {)f tha pf:titiGner by m‘der dated 18- 1Q-2094 (AnnsxuiE-P/ 1}. The hmlsfer was 11m mack ai 11m instailce. of mspenaem N65 who might have. written a letter 011 13-7—2004. 1t is eVideat that i116 impugned t1m1sfer arder was passad not an the basis proved mala fide, but due to adminisfxah'va €Xigency in public intm‘est. It is wall settled pn'nciple af law lbw: transfer is an incidant- of sawice emd it, is far tha amployer i0 decide as t0 Wham a particulai‘ cf§cer§€mployce £5 to b6 pQstal in th€ intamsi of administxafican 22ml wiblic, This (391111 has; limikd juzisdiction t0 iniei’fera ix; imnsfar mattars am} thig Cami c311 iat€rf€re 011137 m the casa 0f pmV6d mala fide, non-competenw 0f the authm‘ity passing the transfer mtlar, and order not boing in conformity with the rules 311d ragulatimls. At {his stage, loanlal counssl ap/poan'sg for tho yeiiiionsr soaks psmlissios of this Cour: io make a ropmsantation to 31s resooodont State for consitlormion of tho potitionex’s case, in View of tho abovo, tho potition is dismissed with the above stated liberty. No order as to costs. Cosseqsentl‘y, l.A.No,5817{2{}G§ stands disposed of. \\ / / 2 Sdl- I Satish 1c Agnih°tri Judge GOWRI