IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13079 of 2011 UDAI KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 26.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of the I.P.C. There was an agreement between the petitioner’s side and the informant’s side that the vehicle will be provided on lease for five years after payment of 55% and after five years on deposit of the remaining 45%, the ownership of the vehicle was to be transferred to the informant’s side or the vehicle was to be returned. The accusation is that subsequently the police came and suggests that the agreement was not genuine. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is nothing on record to suggest that the vehicle in question was not genuine rather the vehicle is still lying with the informant. It is further submitted that informant has retracted from his initial version and has filed compromise petition before learned Court below. Considering the nature of accusation and the retracted version of the informant, let the petitioner 2 namely Udai Kumar, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 305 of 2009. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)