IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 147 OF 2008 SECOND APPEAL NO. 147 OF 2008 SECOND APPEAL NO. 147 OF 2008 Shri Laxman Pandurang Kadam ... Appellant Vs. Smt. Kalavati Laxman Kadam ... Respondent Mrs. S.A.Mudbidri, Advocate, for the appellant. Ms. Kavita Pawar, Advocate, i/b. Mr.Sanjay Kshirsagar, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 26th August, 2008. DATE: 26th August, 2008. DATE: 26th August, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The respondent had filed Special Civil Suit No.105 of 2004 against the present appellant/original defendant for permanent alimony. The suit was decreed and the defendant was directed to pay maintenance of Rs.4,000/- per month. The defendant preferred Regular Civil Appeal No.37 of 2006. That Appeal was also dismissed. Thereafter, the defendant filed this Second Appeal. 3. When the Appeal is called for hearing for admission, the learned Counsel for the respondent makes a statement that the parties have already settled the matter amicably and the husband has given some agricultural land in lieu of maintenance. The learned Counsel for the appellant does not have any instructions from the appellant. However, she makes a statement that in view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the respondent, the Appeal may be disposed of. 4. In view of the above, the present Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. 5. As the Appeal itself is disposed of as withdrawn, the C.A. No.1227 of 2007 does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA, J.) (J.H.BHATIA, J.) (J.H.BHATIA, J.)