IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 23.07.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU A.S.No.162 of 1998 A.Govinda Rao .. Appellant Vs. 1.C.Venkataswamy (died) 2.Suriyanarayana (died) 3.Rangaswamy (died) 4.C.Ramulu (died) 5.Duraiswamy 6.Munuswamy 7.Dhakshana 8.Dasari Lakshmaiah 9.K.Nagaraju 10.K.Appa Rao 11.K.Venkatramana 12.P.Thukka Naidu 13.Chodamma 14.Pidithali 15.Appala Naidu 16.G.Appa Rao 17.Nataraja Mudaliar 18.Seetha Ram 19.T.Balaraman 20.Venkat Rao 21.Saroja 22.Maheswar Rao 23.Venkateswara Rao 24.Srinivasa Rao 25.Lakshmiammal 26.Chinna Rao 27.Prakasam 28.Gopi RR-21 to 24 brought on record as LRs of the deceased R3 as per order of Court dated 6.11.96 & CMP No.11160 to 11162/88 RR-25 to 28 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased 1st Respondent as per order of Court dated 6.11.96 in CMP No.12512, 12513/93. 29.Ratnamma 30.Ganapathy 31.Babu Rao 32.Jagadeeswara Rao 33.Venkata Rao https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 34.Krishna Rao 35.Lakshmipathi RR-29 to 35 brought on record as LRs of the deceased 2nd Respondent vide order dated 19.3.98 in CMP No.15324/96 36.Lakshmikanthan 37.Varadharajulu 38.Chandrasekar 39.Rajendran 40.Karunakaran 41.Vasudevan 42.Sridhar 43.Sangeetha 44.R.Nandagopi RR36 to 44 brought on record as LRs of deceased 4th respondent vide order dt.23.2.2000 in CMP Nos.4736 to 4738/99 and 9321 to 9323 of 1998) .. Respondents This appeal suit has been preferred under Section 96 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree of the learned XIV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras in O.S.No.1655 of 1983 dated 08.04.1986. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : Not served JUDGMENT This is an appeal filed against the judgment and decree, dated 8.4.1986 made in O.S.No.1655 of 1983 on the file of the learned XIV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. 2.The suit was filed by the plaintiff for declaration of his title to the suit property and possession as well as for mesne profits. Before the trial court, there were 20 defendants. Subsequently, when the appeal was filed, since first and third defendants died, their legal representatives, i.e. respondents 21 to 28 were brought on record. Similarly, on account of death of the second respondent, respondents 29 to 35 were brought on record. Subsequently, on account of death of fourth respondent, respondents 36 to 44 were brought on record. 3.Pending proceedings, the 37th respondent was no more and his LRs were sought to be brought on record in CMP Nos.15949 to 15952 of 2002. Further, sole appellant died and therefore, CMP No.2166 of 2007 was filed to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased sole appellant. When these applications came up on 18.6.2010, all four applications were dismissed as no steps were taken. Thereafter, the main suit was listed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.When the matter was called on 5.7.2010, there was no representation on the side of the appellant/plaintiff. In view of the above and that the counsel for the appellant did not take any steps to bring on records the LRs of the sole appellant, this Appeal Suit will stand dismissed as abated. No costs. Sd/- Asst. Registrar //true copy// Sub Asst.Registrar vvk To 1. The XIV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras/ 2. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras. JUDGMENT IN A.S.No.162 of 1998 JRG {CO} TP/6.8.2010. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/