ast 1 wp3021.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3021 OF 2010 Nisar Ahmed Shaikh. ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.S.D.Thokade i/b. Mr.Siddheshwar B. Kalel for petitioner. Mrs. M.P.Thakur, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1,2 and 4. CORAM:­ A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.M.SAVANT, JJ DATED:­ APRIL 30, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Considering the seriousness of the charges, which have been proved against the Petitioner, in our opinion, the view taken by the Appellate Authority is very lenient. We see no reason to depart from the same. Even though the view taken by the First Authority in our opinion was very lenient, it is not open for us to reconsider the same in the Petition filed by the employee. We would refrain ourselves from making any further observations in that behalf. Petition disposed of accordingly. (R.M. SAVANT, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)