IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16377 of 2010 AMARDEEP KUMAR BHINDWAR, SON OF CHANDRADEO BHINDWAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 20.05.2010 The Informant has filed this present application for cancellation of bail granted to opposite party No. 2 on the ground that in the order dated 21.1.2010, it has been noted that there was allegation against 13 persons of having participated in the occurrence, but only two injuries were sustained by the injured whereas the fact is that four injuries were sustained by the injured. The same could be a typographical error. Fact remains that despite allegation of 13 persons firing at the deceased not as many injuries were sustained by the deceased. I see no reason to cancel the bail granted to the opposite party No. 2 on this ground since it is a well established law that cancellation of bail and grant of bail stand on two different footings altogether and there is no ground made out that the opposite party No. 2 in any manner misused the privilege of bail. Application stands dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)