IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2027/2011 Date of decision: 23.3.2011 Haragya Singh, Head Constable ....................Petitioners v. Dalwinder Kaur and another .....................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Mr.Vikas Mehsempuri,Advocate for the petitioner. Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral) Petitioner/husband by filing the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has assailed the order dated 25.1.2011 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Patiala, whereby a sum of Rs.3500/- per month has been granted as maintenance pendente lite to the respondent wife and daughter. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the maintenance pendente lite granted is on higher side. After hearing the learned counsel and perusing the impugned order, I find no merit in the submission made by the learned counsel. It has come on record that the petitioner is working as a Head Constable and accordingly, while granting the maintenance pendente lite the learned Additional District Judge has correctly taken the salary of the petitioner as Rs.20,000/- per month. In this view of the matter, the maintenance pendente lite granted to the respondents cannot be said to be on higher side. Dismissed. 23.3.2011 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge