1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR. MISC.APPR NO.534 OF 2010 IN CRIL.APPLN.NO.66 OF 2010 IN CRIL.REV.APPLN.NO.104.2007. Parvez Ahmed Patel s/o Sharif Ahmad Patel ..vs.. Smt.Samina Zarin Parvez Ahmad Patel and ors. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.R.M.Patwardhan Adv. for the applint. Mr.Shashank Savdekar adv.for R.1. Mr.A.P.Thakre APP for resp.no.2. C ORAM : R.M.Borde, J. DATED : 10th August, 2010. Criminal revision application seeking condonation o delay in seeking restoration of the criminal application dismissed in default is put up for consideration of this court today. It has been brought to my notice that in criminal revision application No.104 of 2007, the order passed by the Judge, Family Court, Nagpur on 12/1/2007 in Petition No.E-41/2004, was subjected to challenge. It is further pointed out that as against the order passed by the Family Court on 12/1/2007, a criminal revision application No.93 of 2007 was presented by the respondent-wife seeking enhancement in the amount of maintenance awarded to her. The revision application was 2 considered on its own merits and was allowed on 18/2/2010 by the learned Single Judge of this court. In view of the decision rendered in criminal application No.93 of 2007 by this court on 18/2/2010, the order sought to be revised in criminal application No.104 of 2007 is no more available for rendering a challenge. Said order has merged into the order passed in Criminal Application No.93 of 2007, by this court. In this view of the matter, the instant applications seeking condonation of delay as well as restoration of the application do not deserve any consideration. Both the applications, therefore, stand rejected. JUDGE. chute