1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No.8200 Of 2009 Manisha Shivaji Tonde. ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. ... Respondents. -------- Shri. P.S. Dighe, Advocate for petitioner. Shri. R.P. Phatke, Additional Government Pleader for respondent No.1. Shri. S.T. Shelke, Advocate for respondent No.4. Shri. M.M. Nerlikar, Advocate, for respondent No.6. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE: 3rd AUGUST 2010 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) We have perused the order passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, 2 Ahmednagar. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was working in the Baal wadi, therefore, she ought to have been appointed while considering the other candidates. 3) Considering the observations of the Chief Executive Officer in the order, Exhibit H, we find that no interference is called for in exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4) The writ petition is rejected. Sd/- Sd/- (K.K. TATED, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.8200.09