IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 31518 of 2011 Date of decision: 16.12.2011 Anita Mehta petitioner vs State of Punjab respondent Present:- Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate. Mr. PS Bajwa, DAG, Pb Mr. Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate M.M.S.BEDI, J. The petitioner is a lady, who had allegedly agreed to sell a flat of Cooperative Society with a promise that the property is free from all encumbrances. She has allegedly received a sum of Rs. 7 lacs. The allegation against her is that a sum of Rs.2.48 lacs is due towards the society. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon an order passed by Assistant Registrar Cooperative Societies wherein it is mentioned that a sum of Rs.13,128/- is to be recovered from the purchaser. I have heard learned counsel for parties and gone through the police record. It appears that there is a dispute regarding the liability qua the flat of the cooperative society. Whether the said liability could be enforceable against the petitioner or the subsequent purchaser, is not required to be determined by this court. The petitioner has admittedly joined the investigation. Dispute, if any, appears tobe of civil nature. The petition is allowed and interim order dated 17.10.2011 is hereby made absolute subject to all the conditions u/s 438(2) Cr.P.C December 16 , 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE