IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30356 of 2009 1. NAMITA SHANKAR 2. SHISHU NAG GUPTA---PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR 2 31.8.2009 Heard Counsel for the petitioners and the Counsel appearing for the state. As per the allegation in the First Information Report, petitioners assaulted the informant with Khukhri and snatched away Rs.14, 100/-. Counsel for the petitioners submits that there is land dispute in between the parties. Case and counter case are being instituted against each other. So far as the present case is concerned, except Section 379 Indian Penal Code other Sections of the Indian Penal Code are bailable. So far as Section 379 Indian Penal Code, it has been mentioned just to make the case non-bailable. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioners is allowed. Let the petitioners - 2 - surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10, 000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri A.K.Srivastava, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in Sadar P. S. case No. 186 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar