IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.80 of 2010 MUKESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 12.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 302 ,201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant’s son Dharmendra Kumar was married with Mamta Devi which was a love marriage. Mamta Devi was already married with Sato Paswan from before. When Dharmendra Kumar was found missing, then the informant suspected that he might have been killed by in-laws of Mamta Devi. Submission is that no body has seen the occurrence and the charge sheet has been submitted in a mechanical manner and without proper investigation. Further contention is that Mamta Devi filed a Complaint case before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in which she has given another version and stated that Kapileshwar Singh and Amit Kumar Singh might have killed her husband. Some other accused persons have been granted bail by this Court. The petitioner has a fair antecedent. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, namely, Mukesh Kumar is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten 2 thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 259 of 2006. SKBOSE (Shyam Kishore Sharma)