HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR ^CO^ Ay^No.195/2007 Sinale Bench: APPELLANT PU^INTIFF Respondents Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Banshidhar, S/o Gurwaro, aged about 50 years, resident of Village Mungjhar, Tahsii- Devbhog, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Jaimini @ Ratni aged about 50 years, wife of Narsingh, resident of Village Mungjhar, Tahsil-Devbhog, Dlstrict Raipur (C.G.) 2. State of Chhattisgarh, through Coiiector, Raipur, District Ralpur, (C.G.) 3. Sub-DlyisionaJ Officer (Revenue), Gariyabandh, District Raipur (C:G.) APPEAL UNDER SECTIOSSE 100 OF CML PROCEDURE CODE.1908 Present : Shri Mahendra Dubey, counsel for the appeijant. Shri Akhil Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for th©State. Heard. ORALORDER (Passed on 13tn day of June,20Q7) (2) The appeilant is aggrieved by the judgment and decree 29-03-2007 passed by the Addltional Dlstrict Judge, Gariyabandh, Dlstrict Raipur In Civii Appeal No.22-A/2006 dismissing the appeai against the judgment and decree dated 21-06-2006 passed by the CJvil Judge Class-I, Gariyabandh, District Raipur in Civil Suit No.26-A/2004 whereby the plaintiff^ suit, was dismlssed. (3) Havsng heard learned counsel for the appellant and considering tnat a concurrent finding of fact has been recorded by both the courts beiow that Jaimlni is the daughter of Bhikari and entitled to succeed to his property, 1 am ofthe oonsidered opinion that no substantiai question oflaw is invoived in this second appeai. (4) In the result, this second appeal is dismissed at the stage of admission. No order as to costs. ^ (5) in view of above, I.A. No.01 which is an application under Order-41 Rule 5 of C.P.C. also stands dismissed. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmuidi Judge Tumane 's '"~