IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.5560/2010 Ramesh Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 07/07/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Liyakat Ali for accused petitioners Mr. Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor for the State ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the allegation against the petitioner is of committing theft of coriander. He was loader in the factory. On similar allegations, five cases were simultaneously registered against him for theft of 20 bags of coriander, out of which he has been enlarged on bail in two cases by this Court in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Applications No. 4300/2010 and 3867/2010 decided on 26.5.2010 and 4.6.2010, respectively. Petitioner is in jail for last about five months. Challan has been filed and except these five criminal cases, no other criminal case is pending against the petitioner and that he would undertake not to repeat the similar offence in future. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications. Considering the rival submissions and without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail during trial. Resultantly, the bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Ramesh Chand S/O Shri Kajormal shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No. 9/2010, Police Station, Vigyan Nagar, Kota on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial, with the stipulation that he shall not repeat such offence in future and in case he is again found committing similar offence, prosecution will be at liberty to apply for cancellation of his bail on this ground alone. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. thanvi