IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2010 / 19TH JYAISTHA 1932 SA.No. 599 of 1999() ----------------------------- AS.198/1994 of ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, THRISSUR OS.1022/1990 of I ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT,THRISSUR .................... APPELLANT(S): (RESPONDENT BEFORE THE LOWER APPELLATE COURT ----------------------- PLAINTIFF BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT. P.I.RATNAM, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, D/O. INASU, COLLEGE OF VETERINARY AND ANIMAL SERVICE, MANNUTHY, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE K.KOCHUPAPPU SRI.M.VENUGOPALAN RESPONDENT(S): (APPELLANTS BEFORE THE LOWER APPELLATE COURT ------------------------- AND DEFENDANTS BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT. 1. THE DIRECTOR OF PHYSICAL PLANT KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY MANNUTHY, THRISSUR. 2. THE REGISTRAR, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY , MANNUTHY, THRISSUR. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.N.D.PREMACHANDRAN, SC, AGRL.UNTY. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.P.MUJEEB, SC AGRL. UTY. THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/06/2010 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss P.BHAVADASAN, J. ------------------------- I.A. No.1192 of 2010 & S.A No.599 of 1999 -------------------------- Dated this the 9th June, 2010 ORDER/JUDGMENT This is a petition to recall the judgment dated 21.5.2010 in S.A No.599 of 1999. By the said order the appeal was disposed of as follows: It is submitted by the counsel for the appellant that the matter has already been settled. Hence the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. No order as to costs." 2. In the petition it is pointed out that the matter has been settled as per the submission made by the counsel for the respondent. It is not correct. Hence it is prayed that the order may be recalled. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent University has pointed out that since the appellant has vacated the quarters, nothing survives for consideration. The claim of the respondent has not been objected to by the appellant. Since the appellant has vacated the quarters of the University, no further dispute remains in this appeal. I.A. No.1192 of 2010 & S.A No.599 of 1999 2 Accordingly, this judgment is recalled and the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE ma I.A. No.1192 of 2010 & S.A No.599 of 1999 3