IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1706 of 2009 Ramji Mauar son of Sri Janakdeo Maur, resident of Village Arai, P.S.-Daudnagar, district-Aurangabad. ….Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. ….Opposite Party 1st Set. 2. Nand Kishore Maur, son of Muneshwar Maur, resident of Village Arai, P.S. Daudnagar, district-Aurangabad. …..Opp. 2nd Party. ….Opposite Parties. ---------------------------------- 3. 05.12.2011 The informant petitioner has preferred this revision application against the order dated 27th August, 2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, IV, Aurangabad in Sessions Trial No.50/02+49/02/473/09 by which the opposite party no.2 has been acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 of the I.P.C. Heard Mr. Amit Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Umashankar Prasad Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the impugned order, it appears that the learned Trial Court has considered the evidence adduced on behalf of the prosecution carefully and has found that the co-accused, Manoj Sharma and Kaushal Sharma are responsible. So far as the accused Opposite Party No. 2, Nand Kishore Maur is concerned, against him, the learned Trial Court has 2 found that the prosecution has not been able to prove its charge beyond reasonable doubt and he is entitled to get the benefit of doubt and hence he has been acquitted. Considering the facts and circumstances stated above, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. Kamlesh (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)