Civil Revision No. 4529 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 4529 of 2010 Date of Decision: 8.11.2010 Smt. Raj Rani and Another …Petitioners Versus Rajeshwar Kumar …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. C.R. Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Jaiswal, Advocate for the respondent. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, for setting aside the exparte judgment dated 8.10.2008 (Annexure P3), filed by the petitioners, was dismissed by the Rent Controller, Ambala Cantt., vide order dated 29.3.2010 (Annexure P6), whereby he refused to recall the exparte judgment. Learned counsel for the petitioners has referred to Order XLIII Rule 1 (d) CPC and submitted that the order is appealable. Learned counsel further submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present revision petition with the liberty to avail the remedy of appeal. However, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the petitioner be protected qua the period of limitation as he has filed the present revision petition in Civil Revision No. 4529 of 2010 2 the wrong Forum. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners. In view of this, the present revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to avail the remedy of appeal. In case the appeal is filed by the petitioners, within a period of three weeks from today, no objection qua limitation shall be raised. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge November 8, 2010 “DK”