IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9065 of 2010 VIJAY RAI @ VIJAY KUMAR RAI SON OF RAM NARESH RAY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 29.6.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the first information report. However in the statement recorded u/s.164 Cr.P.C. of the victim, who had been kidnapped, he has mentioned the name of the petitioner as one of the kidnappers. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the serious nature of the offence including resorting to Section 62 and 66 Cr.P.C. for summoning the witnesses. The trial court will also notice the S.P. and the D.M. concerned for production of the witnesses. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )