IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH MARCH 2011 / 18TH PHALGUNA 1932 LA.App..No. 170 of 2001 --------------------------- LAR.20/1993 of SUB COURT,THODUPUZHA .................... APPELLANT(S)CLAIMANTS 4 TO 10: ---------------------------------------- 1. JOHN, S/O THOMAS, KOTHALIKUNNEL HOUSE, THEKKATHIPPARA, KALLARKUTTY, ADIMALY. 2. JOSEPH, S/O THOMAS, KOTHAIKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA [DIED. LRs impleaded] 3. DEVASSIA, S/O THOMAS, KOTHAIKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. 4. MATHAI, S/O THOMAS, KOTHAIKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. 5. ALEYKUTTY, W/O MATHEW, KOONNANAL HOUSE, MARIYAPURAM P.O., IDUKKI. 6. ANNAKUTTY, W/O KUNJOONJU, MATHAYIL HOUSE, VELLAYAMKUDI P.O., KATTAPPANA. 7. CHINNAMMA, W/O MATHAI, UPPUKUNNEL HOUSE, KAIPPA P.O., KUDAYATHOOR. * ADDL. APPELLANTS ---------------------- 8. MARIYAKUTTY, W/O JOSEPH, (LATE), KOTHAIKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. 9. VALSA, D/O JOSEPH, KOTHAIKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. 10. CELINE, D/O JOSEPH, KOTHAIKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. LA.App..No. 170 of 2001 -2- 11. BABY JOSEPH, S/O JOSEPH, KOTHAIKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA. 12. PAUL JOSEPH, S/O JOSEPH, KOTHAIKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA 13. MOLLY JOSEPH, D/O JOSEPH, KOTHAIKUNNEL, THODUPUZHA *[ADDL. APPELLANTS 8 TO 13 ARE IMPLEADED AS THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE DECEASED 2ND APPELLANT VIDE ORDER DATED 10/07/02 IN C.M.P. NO.2668/02] BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW ZACHARIAH SRI.P.I.DAVIS RESPONDENT(S)/2ND CLAIMANT & R1 AND R2: ---------------------------------------------------- 1. SUBHADRA BHAI, W/O VITTALA PAI, KUNNATHU MADATHIL, OLAMATTOM, THODUPUZHA. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI. 3. THE SECRETARY, THODUPUZHA MUNICIPALITY, THODUPUZHA. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.T.T.JOSEPHINA ADDL.ADVOCATE GENERAL SRI.SHAJI P.CHALY FOR R1 SRI.P.K.SOYUZ FOR R3 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & N. K. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ L. A. A. No.170 of 2001 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 9th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J In this appeal filed in 2001 there is no representation for the appellants. This appeal is directed against the award passed by the Reference Court under Section 30 in favour of the respondents. There is representation for the respondents. We notice that when this appeal was admitted, this Court did not become inclined to grant any order of stay. In all probability, the amount in dispute has been disbursed to the parties who were successful before the Reference Court. The appeal will stand dismissed, however only for default. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE N. K. BALAKRISHNAN JUDGE kns/- -2-