1 Sa636,637 of 1992 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 636 OF 1992 Bashiroddin Mohammed Zainuddin Saudagar (died), through legal representatives and others Appellants V E R S U S Mohd. Amiruddin s/o Md. Yousuf (died), through legal representatives and others Respondents Smt. A.N. Ansari, Advocate for the appellants Shri H.K. Mundhe, Advocate for the respondents WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 637 OF 1992 Hamidabi w/o Gulam Mohammad and others Appellants V E R S U S Bashiruddin s/o Mohd. Zainuddin and others Respondents Shri H.K. Mundhe, Advocate for the appellants Smt. A.N. Ansari, Advocate for the respondents CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 22nd August, 2011 ORAL ORDER : The learned Advocates appearing for the parties inform the Court that the parties have settled the dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise. The terms of the compromise are reduced into writing. They say, since the parties are old, they are unable to come before the Court to verify the correctness of the terms 2 Sa636,637 of 1992 of compromise. However, they say that the parties have signed the document of compromise in their presence and they too have signed the deed of compromise. In view of this, the deed of compromise is marked as ‘EXHIBIT – X’. In view of this compromise, the parties do not press the appeals. Both the appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn. ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. ) SRM/sa/636&637/92/22/8/11