IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN THURSDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2009 / 12TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 10799 of 2009(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- FR.JOHN JOSEPH @ JOJO CST, S/O. MATHAI, AGED 75, DIRECTOR, SION BHAVAN, KAADUKUTTY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.DENIZEN KOMATH SRI.SHERRY J. THOMAS SMT.RAGAM.S.MOHAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF KERALA. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALUVA RURAL, ALUVA. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KORATTI POLICE STATION. 5. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANGAMALY POLICE STATION. 6. C.P.VARGHESE S/O. PAULOSE, AGED 45, CHAKKALATH HOUSE, KUNNAPPILLYSSERY, VATTAPPARAMBU P.O., ATHANI, ALUVA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.A.SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 10799 of 2009 ------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd April, 2009 J U D G M E N T Raman, J. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. 2. In the view we are taking, it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondents. The writ petition is disposed of directing that the respective Station House Officer with whom the petitioner has lodged complaints alleging threat from sixth respondent may enquire into the complaint, in accordance with law, and if preliminary enquiry discloses a real threat for the petitioner, protection may be afforded. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE. nj.