1 2.wp8594.10 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8594 OF 2010 Shri Kacharu Ragho Dive (D/H.) ....Petitioner Vs. Shri Santaram Keru Patil & ors. ....Respondents Mr. M.M. Sathaye, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. Girish Agrawal, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. CORAM:- GIRISH GODBOLE, J DATED:- DECEMBER 1, 2011 P.C. 1. The Writ Petition is already admitted and Rule on interim relief is being heard. The Petitioner has filed Special C.S. No. 88 of 2008 in the Court of Learned C.J.S.D., Nashik in which Application below Exh. 5 was filed for temporary injunction which has been dismissed and Civil Misc. Appeal No. 99 of 2010 is pending in the District Court. 2. Concerned Judge of the District Court at Nashik, to whom the said Civil Misc. Appeal No. 99 of 2010 is assigned for hearing is directed to hear and dispose of the said Appeal on or before 15/2/2012 without being 2 2.wp8594.10 influenced by the Order of the Tahasildar and S.D.O., which are impugned in the present Writ Petition and without being influenced by the pendency of this Writ Petition or the fact that it is admitted. 3. Depending on the outcome of Civil Misc. Appeal No. 99 of 2010 the Petitioner will have liberty to file a fresh Civil Application for interim relief in this Writ Petition. Subject to this liberty, Rule on interim relief is discharged. (GIRISH GODBOLE, J)