vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION CONTEMPT PETITION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.301 OF 2004 NO.301 OF 2004 NO.301 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.786 OF 2002 Mallaya Dattatray Swami ... Petitioner V/s. Assistant Registrar, Kolhapur Zilla Nagari Banks Association & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.G.B. Badiger for Petitioner CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: OCTOBER 7, 2005 OCTOBER 7, 2005 OCTOBER 7, 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The Contempt Petition complains of the breach of the order dated 14.6.2002 of this Court. By this order, the Assistant Registrar was directed to give a hearing to the Petitioner before passing any order. According to the Petitioner, no such hearing was given by the Assistant Registrar and, therefore, after the order was passed, the Petitioner challenged the same in Revision. The Revisional authority has set aside the order of the Assistant Registrar and directed that a fresh hearing should be given. The Petitioner claims that even after the remand, the Assistant Registrar has not cared to pass appropriate orders after giving a proper hearing to : 2 : the Petitioner. 2. In my view, this is not a case of contempt. The contempt complained of is with respect to a breach of the order dated 14.6.2002. If the Petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the Assistant Registrar, there are appropriate proceedings which the Petitioner can avail of. In fact the Petitioner in this case has moved the revisional authority which has resulted in a remand. In the event the Petitioner is aggrieved by the second order passed by the Assistant Registrar, he may move appropriate authority against the order of 21.7.2005. In view of this, Petition rejected.