CRIMINAL MISCELLANIOUS No.14744 OF 2004 ********** In the matter of an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. ********** UDAY SAH, SON OF RAM BHAJAN SAH --------------------------(Appellant) Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. JUGESHWAR SINGH @ JAGESH CHANDRA S/O RAM JANAM SINGH -----------------------(Respondents) ************ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey Mr. Ramanuj Tiwary For the State : Mr. Ramesh Chandra APP. P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ********* Anjana Prakash, J. The petitioner who was the informant of complaint case no. 153 C of 2003 is aggrieved by the fact that the revisional Court vide Crl. Revision No. 289 of 2003 by an order dated 5.4.2004 set aside the order of cognizance taken by the S.D.J.M. Vikramganj at Sasaram. 2. The plea of the petitioner is that the revisional order is illegal since it is evident from the complaint that the accused of the present case had committed excesses upon the complainant and his family since they wanted that the witnesses in the earlier case i.e. Dawath P.S. Case no. 38 of 2002 do not depose in court. 3. On going through the case, I find no illegality in the revisional order, more so because the main argument of the petitioner that the accused had committed excesses on account of the earlier case has no basis since the accused and witnesses are not common in the two cases. 3. In view of such, this application is dismissed. ( Anjana Prakash, J.) Patna High Court, Patna Dated the 19th July, 2010 NAFR/ Fahad.