:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1707 OF 2006 Nitin Shivram Naik and anr. ..Applicants. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. Mr. Niranjan Mundergi with Amol Patankar holding for Mr. J.M.Purani, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr.S.S.Tatkare, APP. for the Respondent. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J. DATED : 07/8/2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The matter was already argued on the last date. A.P.P. states that the settlement is not possible. The allegations in the F.I.R. are pertaining to the offence under Section 498A of the I.P.C. On perusing the F.I.R., it appears that the complainant Namrata was married to the present applicant on 5.1.2005. There are allegations regarding demand of money for motor cycle and of assault. There are also certain other allegations which in my view requires interrogation by police. Not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, application is rejected. 2. The Advocate for the applicants seeks time to surrender. As a special case, one week time is granted to surrender on the applicant No.1 filing an undertaking :2: in the course of the day that he and his mother will surrender before the Investigating Officer on or before 14.8.2006. Such affidavit cum undertaking dated 7.8.2006 now filed by the applicant No.1 at 3.00p.m. is taken on record. (R. S. MOHITE, J.)