HIOHCOURT OP CHHAmSGARH, BILASPUR, W.P. 181 No. 6820 of 2007 PETITIONER Badau Ram, S/o Late Bhagwati Aged about 60 years, R/o Pairi Nagar, Gariyabsuud, (PO & Tah) Raipur Dist. CG State. Versus 1. State of C.G. Tbrougli Secretaiy, Water Resources Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur CG State. 2. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Water Resources Department Pairi Head Works, Sub-DMsion No.2, Sikasar, Gariyaband, (PO & Tah) Raipur Dist, CG Sate WRIT PETITION USDER ARTICLE 226 QF THB CONSTl'roTION OF TSDI& Appearauce: Sbri K.R. Nair, Counsel for the petitiouer. Shri Pradeep Siiigh, Panel Lavvyer for fhe State/ icspondents. ORALORDBR (16.11.2007) SUN!LKUMARSiHHA»_J. Heard. Leanued coiinsel for the petitiouer subm-its that a permanent Gang-iaaa is to be retired at the age of62 years in accordaace wifh the Chhai.tisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam 1967 read with Piuidamental Rules, 56. He also subtuits that the poiat raised has been deeided by Uus Court m batchof matters i.e. W.P. No.108/2005 aad niaay other connected matters on 04.01.2007, reported ia 2007l3lC.G.L.J.29(Gwina. 8s Otttersvs. Stccte of C.G. cmd .others) aad this niatter is squarely covered by that decision, which inay be disposed ofon fhe same terms. Learaed counsel for the State fairly agrees that this matter is covered by the said decision. However, he subiuits fhat in soine raatters the State has filed writ appeals. Uiiless some uiteilm order is passed,merely on account of filing of fhe writ appeal, hearmg of this writ petition catuiot W.P.{S) No.6820 of2007 '4^ vatti be kept ia abeyaace, when fbe inatter is squarely covered by the said judgment. In fhe icsult, ttiis petition is allowed. It is disposed ofia terms of the order dated 04.01.2007 passed ia W.P. No. 108/2005 aad other connected matters. No order as to cost. A. Sd/- Suei! Kumar Sinha Judge