HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13819 of 2006 Date : 28.06.2011 Between : Sahebzadi Ameerunnisa Begum & others. …..Petitioners And Chief Commissioner, Land Administration, Government of A.P. & others. …..Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13819 of 2006 ORDER: This writ petition is filed, seeking directions by way of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of respondents in taking steps in terms of the proceedings in CCLA Ref.No.NA2/186/2006, dated 13.04.2006, and Proceedings No.B/1679/2006, dated 09.05.2006, issued by the 4th respondent, for protecting the property admeasuring Ac.187.27 gts., situated in Sy.Nos.1 to 19 of Sikinderguda village of Rajendranagar Mandal in Ranga Reddy District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India. The properties in question are in the custody of authorities under the Court of Wards Act. The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, A.P., has issued letter, dated 13.04.2006, in CCLA Ref.No.NA2/186/2006, giving necessary instructions to the Mandal Revenue Officers concerned, to protect the properties of Paigah Vicar-ul-Umra, which are under the superintendence of the Court of Wards. In this writ petition, it is the grievance of the petitioners that inspite of such instructions, respondents are not taking steps to protect the said properties. In the counter affidavit filed by the 4th respondent, while denying the various allegations made by the petitioners, it is stated that the land in question, situated at Sikinderguda village, has already been fenced with barbed wire and kaddi stones, showing it as Government land. In view of the fact that the respondents have already carried out the instructions issued by the Commissioner of Land Administration, and that the land in question is already fenced with barbed wire and kaddi stones showing it as Government land, the grievance of the petitioners is redressed. Recording such statement made in the counter affidavit, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 28th June 2011 ajr