MC 3020/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. J Bora, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. D Saikia, learned St anding Counsel, Finance Department, Assam. By this application the following typographical errors/mistakes have been pointe d out in the order dated 13.09.2010: - i) The Seizing officer is the Inspector of Taxes, Tinsukia, instead of the Assi stant Commissioner of Taxes, Tinsukia as shown in the said order. ii) That date of seizure list is 21.11.2009, instead of 20.11.2009 as shown in t he said order. ii) The materials seized are ’records’ instead of ’goods’ as shown in the said o rder. iv) The direction is to be to release the seized ’records’ instead of seized ’go ods’ as shown in the said order. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on a scrutiny of the recor ds, the aforementioned corrections are effected in the last but one sub-para of the order dated 13.09.2010. In other words, the corrections would be as:- i) the Assistant Commissioner of Taxes, Tinsukia would, hereafter be read as In spector of Taxes, Tinsukia. ii) The date of seizure list would read as 21.11.2009 in place of 20.11.2009 and iii) The word goods would stand substituted by the word records. The order dated 13.09.2010, as a consequence would read with the aforementioned corrections. The miscellaneous application stands allowed.