IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5133 of 2007 VISHWANATH PASWAN, S/O- SRI CHOTELAL PASWAN, R/O- VILLAGE- SHERPUR, P.O.- SHERPUR, P.S.- MANER, DISTT.- PATNA:-- PETITIONER . Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, C.R.P.F., NEW DELHI. 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, C.R.P.F. BAILY ROAD, PATNA. 3. THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE GROUP CENTRE, C.R.P.F., MOKAMA GHAT, DISTRICT- PAGNA. 4. THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMINISTRATION) C.R.P.F., PATNA :--- RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 08.09.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Union of India representing the Central Reserve Police Force (hereinafter referred to as “C.R.P.F.”) Authorities. 2. Petitioner was appointed as a Cook by the authorities of the C.R.P.F. While he was under training he sustained injury on 18.1.2003 which fact is evident from paragraph-4 of the order dated 13th May, 2006 passed by the Inspector General of Police, Bihar Sector, C.R.P.F., Patna, Annexure-2. 3. Counsel for the petitioner states with reference to the provisions contained in the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation), Act, 1995 that the Hon’ble Supreme Court having considered the provisions of the Act in the case of Kunal Singh Vs. Union of India and another, reported in A.I.R. 2003 - 2 - Supreme Court 1623 and in the case of Union of India & Ors. Vs. Rajpal Singh, reported in 2009(1) P.L.J.R. 124 (SC) held that member of the Force including the Cook and other followers assisting the Force, if suffer disability, their services should not be terminated on the ground of having attained disability. 4. Let the petitioner seek review of the orders of the Additional DIGP dated 14.11.2003, Annexure-1 terminating the services of the petitioner on the ground of sustaining injury as also of the order dated 13th May, 2006 passed by the I.G., Bihar Sector, C.R.P.F., Annexure-2 who should consider the review petition filed by the petitioner in the light of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid two judgments. The review petition be disposed of as early as possible, in any case within a period of three months of its receipt. Petitioner will be well advised to annex the copy of the aforesaid two judgments along with the review petition. 5. With the aforesaid direction the writ petition is disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)