1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1006 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8192 OF 2004 Suresh Mansingh Taware and ors. ..Applicants Vs. Kailash Subhash Wani and ors. ..Respondents CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1378 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8192 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Sugar, Maharashtra State, Pune and anr. ..Applicants Vs. Kailash Subhash Wani and ors. ..Respondents ......... Mr.Nilesh Patil i/b.Mr.M.S.Karnik, for applicants. Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, AGP for respondent State in C.A.No.1378 of 2008 an. Mr.Ashutosh Singh i/b.Mr.H..S.Sreepad Murthy, for petitioner in W.P.No.8192 of 2004. ......... CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 13h APRIL, 2010. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for intervenors and learned counsel for petitioners in writ petition as well as learned AGP for respondent State. 2] Considering the grounds mentioned in the Civil Application No.1006 of 2010, the same is allowed by permitting the applicants to intervene in Writ 1006-10.sxw 2 Petition No.8192 of 2004. 3] In our view, as the ad-interim relief is in force since the year 2004 in the writ petition, instead of considering the request of the intervenors to vacate the ad-interim relief, it would be just and proper if the writ petition is fixed for final hearing. Writ Petition is fixed for final hearing on 26 th April, 2010. The same be shown on board just below the admission matters. In case the matter is not decided, it will be open for the concerned parties to apply for vacating the stay. 4] Civil Application No.1006 of 2010 is disposed of. 5] Civil Application No.1378 of 2008 filed by the State is also disposed of in view of what is stated above. [R.G. KETKAR, J.] [P.B. MAJMUDAR, J.] 1006-10.sxw