IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 293 of 2009 Date of Decision:January 09, 2009 Sohan Lal ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.J.S.Saneta, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. The dispute in this case relates to computation of benefits under the Assured Career Progression Scheme. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that even though the respondents have accepted the claim of the petitioner yet the benefits have not been calculated correctly. It is also not disputed that the benefits released to the petitioner were as a consequence of an earlier writ petition filed by him. In my opinion this matter would be better decided before a Civil Court where all questions of seniority etc. should be better gone into. In the circumstances this writ petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a civil suit or seek any other appropriate remedy for the same cause. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE January 09, 2009 sunita