IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11357 of 2011 Ajit Singh @ Ajit Kumar Singh, S/O-Sri Brijnandan Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03 19.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 22.12.2010 in a case registered under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is husband of the deceased and according to prosecution case, the marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with the deceased in the year 2009. Subsequently, on 13.08.2010 deceased died in other than normal circumstances. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in course of investigation, co-villagers of the petitioner have very clearly stated that at the time of alleged occurrence, petitioner was not present at his house and when the family members of the petitioner got information about the incident of burning of deceased, they immediately brought the deceased to Bose Clinic, Dehri and also gave information to the informant. It is further contended by him that having got information the informant reached at Bose Clinic, Dehri but unfortunately, deceased could not be saved and after that at the behest of the villagers as well as in anger, the informant lodged the present case but subsequently, when he realized his fault, he filed a petition before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad disclosing the entire real facts which is Annexure-2 of this petition. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor points out that 2 when post-mortem examination of dead body of the deceased was done, the doctor found smell of kerosene oil from the dead body. The submission on behalf of the petitioner is that no doubt, some witnesses have stated before the Investigating Officer that in the morning of the alleged occurrence a hot exchange of words had taken place between the petitioner and the deceased and after that petitioner left his home. So, the deceased might have committed suicide. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Mali P.S. Case No. 64 of 2010. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)