IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.330 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.330 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.330 OF 2008 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2292 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2292 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2292 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Smt.Sarla Bhojawani ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. None for respondent. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2008. DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2008. DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard learned counsel for the appellant. None for the respondent, though served. The Motion is filed for condonation of 327 days delay in filing the above appeal. Perused the affidavit filed in support of the Notice of Motion. The order of I.T.A.T. is dated 17/7/2006. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax granted approval on 30/10/2006 for filing the appeal. However, the appeal was filed on 29/9/2007 i.e. after a lapse of almost 11 months. The reasons given for the delay in filing the appeal is that there was delay in getting the draft appeal memo and insufficiency of stamp papers. The reasons given are totally unsatisfactory. No case is made out for condoning the delay. Notice of Motion is dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)