IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Contmept Petition No. 226 of 2005 Narendra Singh, S/o Devi Singh, R/o Village and post Mau, district- Champawat. ..Petitioner Vs Gyan Singh, Executive Engineer, Research And Planning Division Ii, Pithoragarh …Respondent Sri Rajesh Joshi learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri N.B. Tiwari learned Additional Advocate General For the State. Dated: 20-6-2006 Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard Sri Rajesh Joshi learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri N.B. Tiwari learned Additional Advocate General for the State. The petitioner has filed the present contempt petition for non compliance of the Court’s order dated 17-5-2005, passed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Tandon in Writ Petition No.6654 of 2001 (S/S) Narendra Singh Vs. State of U.P and others. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of State has submitted that the appointment of the petitioner has been considered. By the order dated 24-10-2005, the application of the petitioner to get appointment under dying-in-harness Rules has been rejected. It reveals from the Supplementary Counter affidavit (Annexure No.1) that the application of the petitioner under dying-in-harness Rules was considered and the same has been rejected by the State. Since, the order has been complied with and therefore, notices issued against the applicant are hereby discharged. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to file a Writ Petition against the order dated 24-10-2005. The contempt petition is dismissed in limine. (B.S. Verma, J) Dated:- 20-6-2006 M.K.