^•(r -•^ o 1} /' '^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF TUDICATURE OF CHHATHSGARH o ATBILASPUR WRTTPETmONNO. I^S8 /2005 PETITIONER:\ 6 ^, ^ M/s. J.J. Re-rollers Private limited Situated at Ring road no. 2 Gogaon ,P.0. Sarora Distt- Raipur Through:- Dinesh Goyal ,S/0- Suresh Goyal (Partner) Aged about 34 years R/0-Gharomida Ravinagar Raipur Distt- Raipur (C.G.) |;^bt^| 11^1^.^^.^ II ^^-y""""/,*. ii l?-^\. ^. ^' /A ^.'^^_^^.%- %»:y^g^^ <' ^y.^^\^y ^^' RESPONDENTS:- VERSUS 1) Coal India Limited, through:- Its Chairman, 10, Netaji Subhash Raod Kolkata, (West Bengal) <^- ^<^2) Chairman cuin managing Director, P 7 Q^kiiA T7cic^Qyn r^^al ^\o\A T ^i-n^ ^ South Eastem Coal Field Limited. 10 ^ ff> '^ 0-». °€S^r^ J>y ^^\° A^eePat ^oa^ Bilaspur, ^§@^^Tahsiland District-'Bilaspur (C.G.) ^ 1>'9'^ ^^^!S, T91? s^ ES 3) The General Manager (Sales), 10 Seepat Road, Bilaspiir, Tahsil and District - Bilaspur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through:- Secretary Ministry of Industrial Development D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) y Union of India Through:- Secretary Ministry of Industrial Development Es"— o WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE. CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 'STf^T^T R<li<^-3Tr^T ^w^^ri^T ^rr^ p|N» 3^;=^PTT?PT, ^Tf1<1^<o, (^<ni^y< _.s^/^. ^l^dl'^^l* --y^-r-^---- ^ 200 ^iT^T^crRTT^rf^r As^tt h^arm.; 2S/4/2005 On a mention bemg ma^ Shri Y.C. Sharma for th4 Shri Vmod Deshm.ukh| caveat Shri Vivek Sharma, P.L.j Thakur Vijay Siagh, India/respoudent no,5, Application fpr urgent Heard on I.A. No.2980/^ copies ofthe docuinents. The appUcation is aUo^ filbig typed copies of tlie Heard on I.A. No.3044/(}5 Not opposed. The appUc|a1 Let tlie amendment be i4c< Heard, Shri Deshmukh takes no.l to 3, Shri Sharma take; no.4 aiid Thakur Vijay respondent no.5, Leanied counsel for fh<| inatter is covered by a decisioh passed in W.P. No. 1082/05 Sinbh ct)i<<T<n4iTi Hi^cnT^te^t <F3i«i< ^3:rf^R''3TT^T &, the case is taken up. pefitioner, for respondents no, 1 to 3 on for respondent uo,4. tt. SoUcitor General for Union of :arm.g is allowed. 5 for exemption froni filmg typed ild, Exeniption is graated frora docu4aents. for amendnient. applic|ation is aUowed. ii^corporated. ijiotice on behalf of respondents notice on behalf of respondent taJkes notice on behalf of (R|ishi petitioner contended that the dated 1/4/2005 of fhis Coiirt Miaerals vs. Coal India Ltd. (^^fe^) XI-HC-22 ^TI^T^T f^iNT-sn^T snmr^rf^T ^n^i T^ ^i^i^i^, ^Tn^^i^, K^ii^y . c, 311^1 ^?ich Kl^dl ^ch^v><—^—<</<<— W^ 200 ^^ ^n^T^cTRTC^rf^cr — 2«r aad ofhers), He produced the| placed on record. The aforesaid fact is notj appearing for fhe other side. It is subniitted fhat docuaients before the authoriW per checkUst, The petitic|ner docunients, which ai'e thereof have been Bientioned \i submitted fhat fhe petitionej supply of coal as per liiikage c| been done by th.is Court ui the| This Court ia the W.P. No. 1082/05 has held as ^mder: {{Shn Sharma, petitioners, submit^ filed the documen\ required on 16/12/\ have atso submitte^ relevant for their have been meni evidence. In that vi is ihat those petit^ documents before t^ 16/12/2004 and before this Court^ continue supply of dp^ till verificaiion. Shf\ the respondents^ \ihe petitioners whd^ <=hi^Tcn<n^i ^iHcnT^te^ft<(^^i< ^^Tl^T^TIcRT 'opy of fhe said judgnient. It be disputed by fhe leara-ed coiinsel the petitioner has filed the as required on 16/ 12/2004 as petiticfner has also subiaitte.d fhe relev^nt for its units, aad reasons dtih. dociinientary evidence, It is niay be atlowed to contiiiue londitions tiU verification, as has laforesaid case. judgii|ient dated 1/4/2005 passed ia ?amed counsel for the that the petitioners have |;s before the authority as f|2004 as per checklist They the documents, ivhich are ^nits, and reasons thereof ^ioned imth documentary ^ew of ihe matter, ihe prayer (oners who have filed the ^ze authority as required on h^ve alsofiled the documenis they may be allowed to )fdpal as per linkage conditions Koshy, leamed counsel for supTnits that pending dedsion, have filed the documents (^^Sr) )NN» XI-HC-22 <3T1^T^T f^it^'an^T ^TRT^rf??f J^ T^^qPn^PT, ^Tfl<1^<o, {^Qll^y< ^.&z:.^/.^ ., ^TO^TT^W^ ^^g< before the authorit^ allowed to continue conditions/' GM^Tcn^1<i ^i^cnT^ te^ft <RI-(-<-I< ^^rf^T^n^T and ihis Court may be upply ofcoal asper linkage I, it is directed that penduig aUowed to contmue supply of Haviug thzis consideredj, decision the petitioner shall b( coal as per Imkage conditions, Szibject to what has b^eu stated above, fhis petition staads disposed of, Consequently, M.W.P. Ipo. 1195/05 shall also staads disposed of, Paities are entitled to ainendinent is incorporated, copy of this order after the Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^,. -'s.: •^ 1