IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.5319 of 2010 ALI IMAM @ ALI IMAM MALI son of Raj Mohammad Mali, resident of village- Tetahali, P.s. Barharia, District- Siwan ….Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …OP ----------- 2/ 30.09.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 19.12.2009 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Siwan, in Sessions Trial No.187 of 2007 instituted for the offence under sections 302 and120-B Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act, by which the petitioner has been summoned under section 319 Cr. P.C. The plea of the petitioner is that out of the nine witnesses examined eight have been declared hostile and only P.W.1 Urmila Devi, who happens to be the informant, has named the petitioner, but her evidence has no legal value since she did not name the petitioner in the First Information Report. Considering that the evidence of PW 1 during trial without any corroboration of the same under section 161 Cr. P. C. has no meaning, this application is allowed. Accordingly, the order dated 19.12.2009 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Siwan, in Sessions Trial No.187 of 2007 summoning under section 319 Cr. P.C. is hereby quashed. Application stands allowed. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)