1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 7497 OF 2010 *** 1. Heard Advocate Mr. Wani for Petitioner, Advocate Mr. Patil for Respondent No.1. 2. Though evidence of respondent/ plaintiff is over, trial Court has permitted him to amend plaint after noticing that proceedings of alleged mutation were subsequent. The trial Court has found that present petitioner/ defendant is denying ownership from beginning and, therefore, said mutation entry procured by him was relevant. 2. The event is subsequent, nature of suit does not undergo any change and hence I do not notice any jurisdictional error or perversity. 3. Petition is rejected. No costs. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:26/04/2011. ans/7497