IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-4303 of 2009 Date of decision : 08.11.2010 Ravinder Singh and another ...Petitioners versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Ms. Gursharan K. Mann, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shilesh Gupta, D.A.G., Punjab for respondent No.1-State. Nemo for respondent No.2. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned State Counsel on instructions from ASI Baldev Singh has pointed out that charges have been framed in this case, therefore, the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the FIR is not maintainable in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in Minakshi Bala v. Sudhir Sharma 1994(3) RCR Criminal 123. 2 Faced with the situation, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioners to raise all the points involved in the instant petition at the time of challenging the order of framing charge before the Sessions Judge along with application of condonation of delay or at any subsequent stage in the trial Court. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) November 08, 2010 Judge naresh.k