1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR LPA NO. 39 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 285 OF 2002 (Nayandeepak Clement Maske vs. Anjuman Hami-E-Islam & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & F.M. REIS, JJ. OCTOBER 14, 2009. Heard Shri Darda, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri M.G. Bhangde, learned Senior Advocate with R.M. Bhangde, Advocate for respondents No. 1 & 2. Shri Darda, learned counsel is attempting to point out that as per Government decision dated 26.06.2000, the revised educational qualifications have been held to be applicable to appointments made after 22.11.1993. According to him, the appointment of the appellant in any case was much before that and hence the finding that the appellant was not qualified is misconceived. Shri M.G. Bhangde, learned Senior Advocate points out that this government decision is coming for the first time that too in present LPA. Shri Darda, learned counsel states that the appellant should be permitted to move the learned Single Judge again in the matter by filing an application 2 with appropriate prayers. We accordingly permit the appellant to move the learned Single Judge with appropriate application in this respect. Subject to this liberty, Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE *GS..