IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3844 of 2011() -------------------------------------- (CRIME NO.658/2011 OF VIYYUR POLICE STATION) .... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------ 1. SYED MOULA, S/O.NAVAS JAN, 12/185, FORT STREET, MADHANAPPILLY, CHITTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. KAREEM, S/O.EBRAHIM, THEKKUMMURI, PUTHIYANKAM DESOM, ALATHUR. BY ADV. SRI.V.BINOY RAM RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. MUMTHAS M.A, D/O.ABDUL KHADER, MANGOTTUPIDIKAYIL HOUSE, C/O.OMANA, EDATHARA HOUSE, PADOOKAD DESOM, VIYYUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT- PIN 680 010. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. RAJESH VIJAYAN R2 BY ADV. SRI. M.R. RAJESH THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss CRMC.NO.3844/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A1:- TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.658/11 VIYYUR POLICE STATION OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-1, THRISSUR. ANNEXURE A2:- TRUE COPY OF THE DIVORCE AGREEMENT DT.28.10.2011 BETWEEN THE IST PETITIONER AND 2ND RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE A3:- TRUE COPY OF THE COMPROMISE PETITION IN OP.608/2010 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR. ANNEXURE A4:_ TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.3844 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of November 2011 O R D E R Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.658/2011 of Viyyur Police Station. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Secs.384, 403, 406, 417, 420, 427, 498A and 506(i) r/w 34 IPC. The 2nd respondent is the complainant therein. She is represented in this Court by her counsel. It is submitted by both sides that the case arose out of a matrimonial dispute and the entire dispute has been subsequently talked over and settled out of court and as such, further proceeding in the aforesaid crime may be quashed. Since the dispute is purely personal in nature, this Crl.M.C. is allowed. Further proceeding in Crime No.658/2011 of Viyyur Police Station is quashed. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt