•n/i ./ H1GH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR WRrFPETmON^Q No. 4764 of2009 PETmONER RESPONDENTS rji- Surendra Singh Chawla; Aged 38 years S/o Shri Gyan " Siiigli Chawla, R/o Gyaa House, Statioii Para, Wai-d No. . 12, Mahasamund Tahsil Mahasamimd, Distt. MaliasatilUtid (Chliattis^rh) VERSUS 1. State of CUiattisgarh TTirou^i the Sea'etary, Departoient of Genera! Adaiitusfa-ation, D.K.S. Mantralaya, Bhavan, Rwpur (C.G.) 2. The State Higli Level Caste Scn.itmy Coinmfttee Throu^i its Chainnan, D.K.8. Mantralaya Bhavan; ; Saipur (Clihattisgarii) 3. The Collector, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund 4.The Sub Division OflBcer (Revenue) Mahasamuad Distriet Maliasamund (C.G.) 5. Kamal Kumar Tamboli S/o Dhanirani Tamboli iR/o Kunnipara, Mahasamund, Disfaict Mahasaniund (C.G.) WRTf PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF DMDIA SB: Hon'Ue SEhri Sattsh K.AemhotriLJ. Present: ShrilALohani, Advocatefortfiepetitionar. Shri Anin Sao, Govemment Advocate forthe State. OROERfORAL) (Passed on 03roday ofSeptefflber, 2009) 1. The petitioner has approached this Court earlier in W.P.(C) No. 1105/2009 for the same reliefs as prayed for in this petition. This Conrt, on 26 February, 2009 after having considered all the aspects of fce matter, disposed ofthe matter directing the respondeirt No. 2 to considerlhe case of the petitioner as earlier as possible. '. 2. It is nrformed by Shri Sao, leamed counsel appearmg far the State/respondents that the application was made by the petitionw on 15 May, 2009 after the order dated 26 Febraary, 2009, passed in fhe aforesaid writ petition. 'Ehus, it is expected that a reasonable time would b& requued for consideringlfae application ofthe petitioner. 3. In view ofthe above; the writ petition ia dismissed. How&ver, it is agam reiterated that the High Power Caste Scrutiny Coaunittee i.e. the respondent No. 2 may considerlhe application ofthe petitioner in accardance witti law, as early as possible. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge w"a 1