1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR ORDER S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 6206/2009 Surendra Pal Singh vs. State of Rajasthan Dated : 21.08.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. Yogesh Singhal, for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor for the State. This order governs the disposal of bail application filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. by Mr. Yogesh Singhal Advocate on behalf of the applicant Surendra Pal Singh pertaining to F.I.R. No. 64/2009 of police station Mahila Thana, District Bharatpur in the offences under Sections 498-A and 406 of IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has canvassed that he is being falsely implicated by the police. Evan a bare perusal of the FIR does not reveal any allegation to have been levelled against him by the complainant. Whatever allegations are found to have been levelled, they are against the complainant's father-in-law and mother-in-law and the petitioner's brother. The police for no rhyme or reason intends to arrest him, whereas, he has committed no offence and he is innocent, as such, he may be granted indulgence of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail petition. 5. Investigating Officer of this case Shri Ram Singh, Sub Inspector, police station 2 Mathurgate is present in the Court. 6. Having considered the submissions made at the bar and perused the relevant material available on record, it is noticed that the complainant Neeta Singh has not levelled any allegation against the petitioner in the FIR. The Investigating Officer submits that later on he has levelled so many allegations against the petitioner in his statements given under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. There is ample evidence against him. But the version of the Investigating Officer is not found to be true. I, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, feel that it is a fit case wherein the anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner and the bail petition is ordered to be allowed. 6. Therefore, the SHO/I.O. Of the Police Station Mahila Thana, District Bharatpur is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Surendra Pal Singh S/o. Sh. Teekam Singh in FIR No. 64/2009 registered in the offences under Sections 498-A and 406 of IPC, he shall enlarge him on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.500/- with a surety bond in the like amount, to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i) He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required: (ii)He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)He shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. (iv)He will not commit any offence during the period of bail. (MAHESH BHAGWATI), J. Mak/- s-37