IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22680 of 2011 Md. Umardaraz Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- 2/ 12-09-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that he had already divorced his wife before institution of a case under Section 498A of the IPC and in the aforesaid background, whatever undertaking was given by the petitioner which happens to be basis for granting bail to the petitioner by the learned Sessions Judge in connection with B.P. No. 46/2010 order dated 07.01.2010 was wrong. Taking into account the submission advanced on behalf of the petitioner, it is crystal clear that the order of bail was obtained after deceiving the court. As such, I do not find any illegality in the order impugned and accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. perwez (Aditya Kumar Trivedi,J.)