IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.170 of 2011 PANKAJ KUMAR @ PANKAJ KUMAR YADAV SON OF RAJDHAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 26.04.2011 Petitioner is juvenile in conflict with law. He is seeking bail in a case instituted under Sections 363, 366A and 34 of Indian Penal Code. It is contended that from the statements of the girl as also the report of the Probation Officer, it would appear that the occurrence was preceded by love affairs between the petitioner and the victim. Counsel submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to marry victim if the parents of the girl are agreeable. A report from the concerned Probation Officer was called which is at Flag-A. From perusal of the said report, it appears that the said officer has also reported about the on going affairs between the petitioner and the victim. Considering the stand of the petitioner before this Court and the fact that there is no previous criminal antecedent against the petitioner and that he is in Remand Home since 5.8.2010, this Court directs release of the petitioner abovenamed on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Indrajit Singh, J.M. 1st Class, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa (Sadar) P.S. Case No. 69 of 2010 (G.R. No. 238 of 2010) subject to the 2 following conditions: (i) One of the bailors shall be own close family member of the petitioner. (ii) It shall be the duty of the said bailor to produce the petitioner before the Court below as and when required. In case of default in such appearance without any cogent/compelling reason, the Court below shall have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (iii) During the subsistency of the present privilege of bail, if it is found that the petitioner is found involved in any other criminal case, the same shall be treated as a breach of condition of bail entailing cancellation. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J)