1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.42 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM: P.R.BORKAR, J. Date : July 21, 2010 None for the contempt petitioner. Shri S.S.Manale, Advocate for Respondent No.2. 1. On the face of it, contempt petition is not tenable as the order of which the contempt is alleged is not passed by the court. Original proceedings were arising out of mutation entry. 2. In the circumstances, contempt petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to follow other remedy available in law. (P.R.BORKAR, J.) 3. Lateron Mr. Venjane, learned Advocate for the petitioner appeared and prayed for 2 recall of the order. 4. Advocate Shri Venjane is heard on merits. He canvassed that the Additional Commissioner has acted as a court. However, I am not satisfied with the submission. Original proceedings are regarding taking of mutation entry in the revenue record and therefore violation of the order would not be contempt of the court under the Contempt of Courts Act. 5. However, as made clear earlier, the petitioner is entitled to pursue any other remedy available under the law for breach of the order. 6. Contempt petition stands disposed of. pnd/cp42.10 (P.R.Borkar, J.) 3