IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 12769 of 2008 Between: G.Rajender Reddy, S/o. G.Ram Reddy, R/o. Plot No.171 (East), Road No.13, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Commissioner , Cyberabad, Gachibowli, Hyderabad. 2 Station House Officer, Moinabad Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 3 Sub-Inspector of Police, Moinabad Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 4 G.Shivender Reddy, S/o. G.Ram Reddy, R/o. Plot No.171(West), Road No.13, jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the 1st to 3rd respondents in interfering with petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment over the land admeasuring Ac.9.26 gts. in Sy.No.156 and Ac. 5.03 Gts. in Sy.No.157/1 situated at Yankapally Village, Rajendranagar Taluq, Ranga Reddy District thereby harassing the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India and consequently direct them not to interfere with the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment over the said property and further not to harass the petitioner and pass such other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:M/S INDUS LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 12769 of 2008 ORDER: The writ petition is filed alleging that the respondents 1 to 3 are interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment by the petitioner of the land in an extent of Acs. 9.26 guntas in Survey No. 156 and Acs. 5.03 guntas in Survey No. 157/1 situated at Yankapally Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District at the instance of the 4th respondent. The learned Government Pleader for Home has obtained instructions from the official respondents and states that the 4th respondent has lodged a complaint with the 3rd respondent alleging trespass by the petitioner into the property. On a perusal of the complaint and on satisfaction that the complaint does not disclose any cognizable offence but merely relates to several disputes between the petitioner and the 4th respondent, no further action was taken on the complaint. The learned Government Pleader also states on instructions that the petitioner was never summoned to the police station and the said allegation is false. Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the above response from the respondents 1 to 3 as narrated by the learned Government Pleader for Home. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J DATE: 23rd June, 2008 pnb To 1. The Commissioner , Cyberabad, Gachibowli, Hyderabad. 2. The Station House Officer, Moinabad Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 3. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Moinabad Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 4. Two Ccs., to the Govt. Pleader for Home, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. 5. Two C.D. copies ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER