HI6H COURT OF CHHATTCSSARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (227) No. 4081 of 20(^ P&titioner l^imari 6uri&shwori Sahu. b/o Shri A. K. &ihu, Aged obout 29 years, R/o 781, Sincihiya Naair, Dur9, bistrict Ourg (C.^.) Yersus ftespondents 1. R&gbna! Trarssport Authority, Chhanisgarh, toipur. 2. The 5ect"etat"y, Re9bnat Transport Authority, Chhottssgorh/Raipur. 3. Sanar Khan, Shakur Traveis K. K. Road, MoudhG Poro, Raipur. WKFT PETTTON UNbER ARTICLE 227 OF THE coNSTrrunoN OF INDIA. Singte Beneh : Mon'bb Mr. Satlsh ((. Agy»»hot»'i.J. Shri Somkont Verma. Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Vincry' HiSFit, bsputy AdvocGt& Ssr^nst for thiB raspGndents No. 1 and2. ORALORDER (Passed on this 29th day of JuSy, 2008) 1. With the conssnt of learn&d c^unsat Qppearsn9 for ths partiss, thB matt&r- ss h&Grd finally. 2. The p&tition&r, being aggri&yed by the order dated 14<7-20(^ (Annexure P/2), |xss5fecS by the Stats Transport Appelhte Tribuna! (5TAT) has fited this petition, whereby the ordar cfated 29.1.2008 was qua^'i&d and th& mattfer WQS r&mand&d back to the R&gional Trcnsport AuliiForsty (&TA) to pass a fresh order, after offording an opportunity of hearing to the petstiora&r, as wsli as oy^s AbduS Soiim- 3< LeQrn&d counsfel appeorsng for the p&titioner ^ubmit^ that fne time vyas changed at <rifie instance of the re^ond&nt No.S without foSiowing llie prop&r proc&dure. Th& p&tstionsr was prajudicecl on dccount of chang& of titfiings. The STAT aftftr haying consid&r&d ^ -rf-ie contentsons of th& parties hos ri^tiy cotTss to the concSusiori that the matter requirss reconsideration Qftsr csffording Gn opportunity of heortng to the concerned parties- Accordmgiy, 't+ie order dated 29.1-2008, pas^&d by the &TA, Saipur wa^ qua^h&d and the matter wa5 r&monded back to conssdsr the ass& afresh, oft&r afforcling an oppor-tunity of hearing to th& conc&rned part-sss. After hoving h&ard {fieirned counset Gpp^aring for tha porti&s and p&ru^irsg the plsadin^s ond documents appsnd^d thsreto, T do not find any reasons to Interf&re sn th& impugn&d ord&r, whieh ss unsxc&ptjona!. Th^ Trsbunal hos rightly pass&d the ord&r dGtad 14.7.2008, as the order dated 29.1.2008 veas pass&d by the RTA without consjdersng th& case of the other concferned partie^. Thus, no ir»terferenc&i5 wsrronted in liie impugned ordar- 71i& petition i3 according!y dismis^&A Thokur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge