IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-33914 of 2010 Date of Decision: 07.01.2011 Ravinder Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. R.S. Rai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anurag Arora, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, DAG Punjab Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for the complainant 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned Sr. Advocate appearing for the petitioner has stated that his bail application was not decided by learned Addl. Sessions Judge on the ground that further proceedings were directed to be stayed by this Court in Crl. Rev. No. 1762 of 2010 filed by Gurpreet Singh who was summoned as co-accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to move bail application before learned trial Court. He has rightly argued that stay of trial should not be construed to mean that bail application cannot be heard. Crl. Misc. No. M-33914 of 2010 2 Learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab as well as learned counsel for the complainant has no objection, if learned trial Court is directed to decide the bail application at its own merits in accordance with law. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner-accused to move such an application before the learned trial Court and in the event of moving such an application, same shall be decided at its own merit in accordance with law. (ALOK SINGH) 07.01.2011 JUDGE reena