FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10668 OF 2010 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2 This petition takes exception to the order dated 13th August, 2010 below Exh.23 in R.C.A. NO.258 of 2008. 3 The learned Counsel for the petitioners states that an application was filed by the plaintiffs for appointment of court commissioner for measurement of land for ascertaining encroachment made by the defendants since the earlier measurement does not show as to on which side the encroachment is made. The counsel further submits that unless the said position is ascertained, it is not possible to proceed further in the matter before the trial Court. He also invited my attention to the memo of the petition, grounds taken therein, and the annexures. It is not in dispute that the plaintiffs got the land measured through TILR and the measurement map is filed on record. The TILR is competent State Authority dealing with measurement of the lands. Therefore, the trial Court has rightly observed that another attempt by the petitioners to file application for appointment of court commissioner is an attempt to collect evidence through court. 4 In my opinion, the trial Court has taken a possible view. No interference is called for exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, writ petition is dismissed. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) 23.11.2010. PLK/*