THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 780 of 2010 Dated: 05.03.2010 Between: R.V.Krishna and 2 others … Petitioner And P.Veena and 3 others. … Respondents THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 780 of 2010 O R D E R : The revision petitioners are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.38 of 2005 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ananthapur. The suit is filed for permanent injunction and while the trial was in progress, the plaintiffs filed I.A.No.685 of 2009 with a prayer to examine one Sri A.Javeed and Sri Malla Reddy as Court witnesses on plaintiffs’ side. The said application was dismissed by the Court below by order dated 28.10.2009 and aggrieved by the same, the present revision petition is filed. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and having perused the material available on record, I do not find any justifiable reason to hold that the order under revision suffered from any patent error of fact or law warranting interference by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. If the plaintiff intends to examine the said witnesses as his witnesses, it is always open him to do so. However, as rightly held by the Court below, he cannot insist the Court to summon them to examine as Court witnesses. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________ G. ROHINI, J. Date:05.03.2010 KLP