IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.21349 of 2011 Date of Decision : November 17, 2011. B.R.Rana .....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.B.R.Rana-petitioner-in-person. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The only plea worth consideration raised by the petitioner pertains to correctness of the information relating to Item No.3 of his application dated 29.7.2010 (Annexure P-1). It does appear from the record that firstly the respondents took a plea that “the complaint was examined in their office for verification of facts and action as per the provisions of the Act/Rules has been taken.” But in the second appeal, the plea taken by them regarding the same information was that “as per the record of their office, no application given by Sh.Kadam Singh, resident of Village Uchana, District Karnal has been received in their office at diary No.877 dated 12.1.2008”. The information CWP No.21349 of 2011 [2] given at two different stages cannot be reconciled. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the State Public Information Officer-cum-District Town Planner (HQ), Town and Country Planning, Haryana, Chandigarh to specifically clarify as to which information out of two supplied to the petitioner is correct, to enable him to proceed further in accordance with law. The needful shall be done within a period of one month from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. November 17, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE