IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1532 of 2009 (M/S) Azhar Parvez S/o Sri Sikandar Parvez R/o 230, Rajpur Road Dehradun. ………Petitioner Versus 1. State Transport Appellate Tribunal Dehradun. 2. Manmohan Singh Bisht S/o Sri B.S. Bisht R/o 18 EC Road Dehradun. 3. Jasveer Singh S/o Harbhajan Singh R/o 11/4 Guru Road, Dehradun. ….Respondents. Shri Gopal Narain, Advocate for the petitioner. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. By means of this petition, moved under Article 227 of Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 15.05.2009, passed by State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Dehradun, in Revision No. 01 of 2009, and Revision No. 02 of 2009. 2. Heard. 3. The same impugned order was earlier challenged by other persons, who were parties to said revisions, who filed civil writ petition No. 749 of 2009 (M/S) and civil writ petition 2 No. 785 of 2009 (M/S). Said writ petitions were consolidated and after hearing learned counsel for the parties by a detailed judgment and order dated 21.08.2009, this Court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the order, passed by the State Transport Authority in the revisions with further direction that R.T.A. may consider applications of the petitioners afresh for granting Stage Carriage Permits in the route Dehradun-Doiwala, in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the present petitioner submitted that he could not file objection before the revisional authority (State Transport Appellate Authority), as notices were not properly served on him. This question cannot be seen by this Court in its writ jurisdiction whether the service before State Transport Appellate Authority is proper or not. From the impugned order it appears that the notices were given to all the parties and those who filed objections, were heard. The objections of the petitioner are not different to the writ petitioners, who filed writ petition No.749 of 2009 and writ petition No. 785 of 2009. 5. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties, and after going through the impugned order, and the order dated 21.08.2009, passed by this Court in aforesaid 3 two writ petitions, this writ petition is also disposed of in terms of the same with further observation that if the present petitioner’s application was pending, the same shall also be considered in accordance with the law by the State Transport Appellate Authority. (Stay application No. 7875 of 2009, also stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt:10.09.2009 Sweta