IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.40384 of 2009 PAWAN KUMAR YADAV, S/o Bhagwat Yadav, R/o Village – Ora Bagicha, P.S. Dharhara, Distt. Munger ……….... Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………….… Opposite Party. ----------- For the Petitioner:- Mr. Shivendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the State:- Mr. Matloob Rab, A.P.P. ------------ 2. 25.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is not named in the first information report and his name has surfaced upon the confessional statement of co-accused Arvind Yadav recorded by the police. Said Arvind Yadav has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court. That apart, co-accused Neha @ Pinki, Puja Devi and Amit Kumar have also been granted bail by this Court. It is submitted that the Bolero Jeep has immediately been recovered on the same day. So far as the antecedent of the petitioner is concerned, it has been stated that the petitioner is involved in another case lodged under Section 302 I.P.C. by his own uncle due to the land dispute which also gave rise to lodgment of a 2 counter case by the brother of the petitioner. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the petitioner, Pawan Kumar Yadav to be released on bail on his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Barauni (Zeromile) P.S. Case No. 291 of 2008, with the condition that one of the bailors must be the family member or close relative of the petitioner and, to this effect, the bailor must swear an affidavit showing his genealogy as to how he is related to the petitioner. It is further directed that after the release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in a criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds of the petitioner. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )