THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.28186 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner was granted pattadar pass book and title deed under the A.P. Record of Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (for short ‘the Act’), in respect of Ac.1.16 guntas of land in Sy.No.70, of Anamagal Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, on the strength of a sale deed dated 10-01-1982. Respondents 4 to 10 filed an appeal before the 2nd respondent, under Section 5(5) of the Act. The appeal was dismissed on 17-12-2007. Thereupon, they filed a revision, under Section 9 of the Act, before the 1st respondent. The revision was allowed, through order dated 06-09-2008, and the pattadar pass book issued in favour of the petitioner was set aside. The same is challenged in this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Revenue, and learned counsel for respondents 4 to 10. The necessity for this Court to examine the legality and propriety of the impugned order is obviated on account of a subsequent development. The petitioner filed O.S.No.1138 of 2008 in the Court of II Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, for the relief of declaration of title and perpetual injunction against respondents 4 to 10. The Act itself makes it clear that any entries made, or orders passed under it are subject to adjudication in a civil suit. Section 8(2) of the Act makes this very clear. Once the petitioner had chosen the remedy of filing a suit for declaration of title, any observations made in the impugned order dated 06-09-2008 hardly become relevant. The parties have to abide by the outcome of the said suit. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing that the rights of petitioner, on the one hand, and respondents 4 to 10, on the other hand, vis-à-vis the land in question, shall be subject to the outcome of the pending suit. It is needless to mention that the pattadar pass book and title deed shall have to be issued in accordance with the decree, that may be passed in the suit. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.06-04-2009. KO