IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9443 of 2009 MS.AISHA PRAVEEN, D/O MR. SHAKIL AHMAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BHAGARI, P.O.-BIRWAN, P.S. – MANJHAULIA, DISTRICT-WEST CHAMPARAN, BETTIAH ………………..PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Education Ministewr, Bihar, Patna. 3. District Magistrate, West Champaran. 4. Block Development Officer, Manjhaulia Block, West Champaran. 5. Mr. brispti Kishore, father name not known, Panchayat Sevak, and punch, Panchayat Block, Manjhaulia, Gram panchayat, village-Harpur Gaswa, District-West Champaran. 6. ms. Nishart Praveen, W/o Md. Azixul Haque, Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat , village-Pradhan Harpur Gashwa, Block-Manjhaulia. 7. Shahina Khatoon, D/o Sk. Manjar Alam, W/o Habib Ahmad, Resident of village-Bhogari, P.O.-Biswan, Manjhaulia, District-West Champaran, Bettiah. 8. Anwari Khatoon, D/o Sk. Manjar Alam, W/o Resident of village- Bhogari, P.S.- Manjhaulia, District-Bettiah, West Champaran …………….. Respondents. ----------- 2. 21.08.2009 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the state. Petitioner has earlier come before this court in C.W.J.C. No. 9666 of 2008 which was disposed of by order dated 05.09.2008 as the petitioner chose not to press the case on merit. He simply expressed his desire to direct the respondent No. 4 (Block Development Officer, Majholia) to dispose of his pending representation. Accordingly, the writ application was disposed of. The representation of the petitioner, in the light of the direction of this court, has duly been disposed of by the Block Development Officer, Majholia by order dated 15.01.2009. On perusal of the impugned order, it transpires that in - 2 - compliance of the direction of this court, matter relating to appointment of Panchayat teachers, was inquired and after giving written notice to all such candidates who either participated for counseling for appointment as untrained teachers or subsequently, were appointed as untrained Assistant teachers. The impugned order shows that counseling was held on 09.12.2006 & 14.12.2006 in which 234 candidates had appeared. So far this petitioner is concerned; she did not appear for counseling either on 09.12.2006 or 14.12.2006. The petitioner has made allegation regarding demand of gratification by Mukhiya and Panchayat Secretary of Gram Panchayat Raj, Harpur Garjwa. This aspect was also considered by the Block Development Officer and the finding is that allegations are false. Petitioner in the writ application has not been able to make out a case; so far the findings recorded by the Block Development Officer are concerned. It also transpires that subsequent to the passing of the impugned order, the petitioner has instituted a Complaint Case against husband of the Mukhiya, Panchayat Secretary and others, that has got no bearing on the order passed by the Block Development Officer . I find that this matter needs no further interference. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. akv (Mridula Mishra, J.)