IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23848 of 2010 SACHIDA KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU. VIG. ----------- 11. 18.5.2011 The present record has been placed by the office with the explanation of the Officer which was sought by the Court by its order dated 30.3.2011. The show cause appears at Flag „Q‟ with the forwarding letter of the District and Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur. The Officer has stated that he could not understand the clear spirit of the Court‟s order dated 23.2.2011 passed in the present petition but at the same time appears making some statements which go to indicate that the Officer, by innuendo, appears accusing either the Court or its Judges of being so reckless as to ruining the career of any Judicial Officer. This Court extracts the words in the above context: “that we are most helpless and weak persons whose career can be ruined any time.” Not only that the Officer appears addressing the Judge himself as if I were visiting Darbhanga only to assess the conduct of Judicial Officers and, thus, again appear makaing some reckless statements when he was addressing me personally in the following terms: “ Your Lordship is very well aware about my character, integrity and efficiency as Judicial Officer because I was posted in your Lordship‟s home town Darbhanga and you Lordship was part of the Darbhanga Bar before elevation to the Hon‟ble Court‟s Bench and now justice is in the hands of your Lordship. Lastly I beg pardon to the Hon‟ble Court for my any submission or wrong(if 2 any) I may have committed.” The above statement is not only false, but is simply contemptuous as the same is quite contrary to some known facts, like, I was never a member of Darbhanga Bar, when the Officer was posted there. The statement appears perverse and shocking The statements made by the Officer in his uncalled for report making some comments which were out of context to the observations of the Court contained in Court‟s order dated 23.2.2011 could not be appreciated by any reasonable mind. However, considering that the Officer has begged to be pardoned, I drop the idea of making entries in his personal records. However, I desire to record that the Officer has to be very very careful in choosing his words and making statements including that on the personal level to a Judge of the Court because a Judge who sits in the Court is only concerned with his Judicial proceedings in Court and knows nothing except that. Moreover, personally speaking, the Officer was never known to me and whatever I know about the Officer I could gather from his judicial orders and I do not carry a very good opinion about him which opinion of mine further gets lower on the scale of evaluating a Judicial Officer. Let this order be communicated to the Officer concerned. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)