IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION First Bail Application No.971 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Multan ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: November 10, 2010 __________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.101/2010 Under Sections 304 and 201 IPC P.S. Jhabreda, District Haridwar ______________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the post-mortem of the dead body of deceased was not conducted and without conducting any post-mortem the dead body of the deceased was cremated by the complainant. He further submitted that initially the deceased was medically examined at Roorkee Hospital and as per the medical report the injuries were shown to be caused by sharp edged weapon. However, according to prosecution story the deceased had fallen down from roof. He further submitted that these contradictions in the prosecution story and medical evidence create a reasonable doubt in the prosecution story. After considering all the facts and circumstances, perusing the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of J.M. Roorkee. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 10.11.2010 RG