IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 538 OF 2010 MRS. MARIA PIEDADE GOMES ... Petitioner Versus MRS. PHILOMENA GOMES AND 7 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Vivek Rodrigues, Advocate for the Petitioner. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 4th October, 2010 Oral Judgment: Heard Mr. Rodrigues learned cousnel for the petitioner. On 21.7.2010 notices were issued to the respondents for final disposal. The respondents though served are absent. Hence, Rule. By Consent heard forthwith. By this petition the petitioner challenges order dated 16/4/2010 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division at Vasco in Special Inventory Proceedings no.39 of 2005 by which an application under Section 152 r/w Section 114 of C.P.C. has been dismissed. In Inventory Proceedings no.39/2005 all the parties filed consent terms on 15/3/2008 pursuant to which consent decree dated 19/3/2008 was passed . Thereafter, on 11/8/2009 an application was filed by Maria Piedade Gomes for correction of the consent terms and consequently correction of the consent decree in so far as item no.1 of the consent terms is concerned. The learned trial Judge held that Section 152 r/w 114 of C.P.C was not attracted and consequently dismissed the application. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered opinion that having regard to the fact that all the parties state that there is an inadvertent error in item no.1 at the time of filing the consent terms, the same deserves to be allowed in terms of Section 152 r/w Section 153 of C.P.C. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 16/4/2010 passed by the Civil Judge, Sr. Divn., Vasco is quashed and set aside. Necessary amendement to the consent decree shall be carried out by the learned trial Judge in terms of the proposed amendment. The writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ap/-