C. Rev. No. 146 of 2010 20.9.2011 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. G.C. Gupta, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Ashish Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents. Heard and gone through the record. Order dated 4.10.2010 was passed in the presence of the parties and the reason given in the order is that in the case of another tenant, under the same landlord, use and occupation charges had been fixed @ `10,000/- per month, though agreed rate of rent was `34/- per month. In the present case, agreed rate of rent was `200/- per month as held by the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority, and so, the use and occupation chares could not have been lesser than the amount of `10,000/- per month, fixed in the other case. Hence, the petition is dismissed. September 20, 2011 (Surjit Singh), J. (pankaj)