IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 795 of 2009 Between: 1 Amireddy Rajamma W/o. Malla Reddy R/o. Hanmagipalli, Bejjanki Mandal, Karimnagar District. 2 Amireddy Malla Reddy S/o. Gouraiah R/o. Hanmagipalli, Bejjanki Mandal, Karimnagar District. 3 Amireddy Raji Reddy S/o. Malla Reddy R/o. Hanmagipalli, Bejjanki Mandal, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Special Deputy Collector LA Unit, SRSP. LMD. Colony, Karimnagar District. 2 Amireddy Bal Reddy S/o. Malla Reddy R/o. Hanmajipalli, Bejjanki Mandal, Karimnagar District. 3 Amireddy Shanthamma W/o. Bal Reddy R/o. Hanmajipalli, Bejjanki Mandal, Karimnagar District. 4 Amireddy Malla Reddy S/o. Bal Reddy R/o. Hanmajipalli, Bejjanki Mandal, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any order or direction, writ or writs more particularly Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent No.1 in proposing to pay the compensation to respondent Nos.2 to 4 relating to the house bearing No.1-36 situated at Hanmajipalli Village, Bejjanki Mandal, Karimnagar District, acquired in pursuance of Draft Notification dated 03-07-2008 published in Shakshi Newspaper dated 23-07-2008, as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to refer the matter to Civil Courts under Section 30 and 31 of the Land Acquisition Act. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.MANOHAR RAO Counsel for respondent No.1: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 795 of 2009 O R D E R: It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in view of filing of W.P. No. 6682 of 2009, this writ petition has become has become infructuous and, therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. Permission accorded. Recording the said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. C.V. RAMULU, J. Date: 17-4-2009. MVB.