IN THE HIGH COUR T OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.164 of 2011 1. Ghanshyam Rathi son of Sri Jathmal Rathi. 2. Jethmal Rathi son of late Lalchand Rathi. Both resident of Flat No. 31 and 32, Regency Gardens, New Patliputra Colony, P.S.-Patliputra, District-Patna. .........Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The State Drug Controller-cum-Chief Licensing Authority, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Drug Inspector, Patna-4. 4. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Patna. 6. The Inspector-cum-Officer Incharge, Pirbahore Police Station, Patna. .......Respondents ----------- 04 15.11.2011 Heard Mr. Gajanan Arun, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G.P.-7, learned counsel for the State. Learned G.P.-7 fairly concedes that instant First Information Report is not maintainable because of the fact that the same is barred under Drugs and Cosmetics Act. However, submitted that Complaint Case No. 537 (C-2) of 2010 had already been filed by the informant of this case, wherein cognizance had already been taken, so submitted that legal recognition of First Information Report has vanished, consequent thereupon is fit to be quashed. Taking into account the submission of learned G.P.-7, I do feel that continuity of Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 2 470 of 2009, instituted at the behest of Ashok Kumar Yadav, Drug Inspector no way justifies its continuance. Moreover, complaint is permissible that too by Drug Inspector under Drugs and Cosmetics Act. As such, the First Information Report of Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 470 of 2009 followed with its ancillary development, is hereby quashed. Safik (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)