IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14489 of 2011 UDAY KUMAR PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 10.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the informant. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the petitioner, being the cashier of the informant's liquor firm, has misappropriated Rs. 8, 50, 000/-. It is submitted by learned Sr. counsel for the petitioner that there is no proof with regard to the employment of the petitioner and the entrustment of money to the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that the evidences have come during the investigation that the petitioner was actually running the liquor firm and he misappropriated the money. Considering the nature of accusation against the petitioner, let the above named 2 petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (Town) P.S. Case No. 897/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)