THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S. APPA RAO C.M.A. M.P. No. 230 of 2011 and C.M.A. No. 3858 of 2003 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana) This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the order dated 26.09.2003, passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Proddatur, dismissing O.P. No. 29 of 2000, filed by the appellant-husband, seeking dissolution of marriage between him and the respondent held on 31.10.1987. Though by reason of the impugned order, the Court below refused to grant the relief prayed for by the appellant, but, in the present appeal, the appellant filed application in C.M.A.M.P. No. 230 of 2011, stating that he and the respondent entered into a Memorandum of Compromise, which is signed by both parties as also by their counsel, and they filed the said Memorandum of Compromise, along with the application and prayed that the Memorandum of Compromise be recorded and decree of divorce by dissolving their marriage in terms thereof, be passed. Today, both the appellant and the respondent appeared before this Court. They identified each other, their signatures, and the counsel appearing on their behalf also identified them. Both the appellant and the respondent prayed for grant of decree of divorce in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise entered into between them by dissolving their marriage. In view of the above, the Memorandum of Compromise, entered into by the parties, is recorded, and the marriage of the appellant and the respondent stands dissolved by mutual consent, in terms of the said Memorandum of Compromise, which shall form part of the compromise decree. Accordingly, the C.M.A.M.P. No. 230 of 2011 is allowed. Consequently, the order under appeal is set aside and C.M.A. is allowed. No costs. _____________ N.V. RAMANA, J. ______________ K. S. APPA RAO, J. 14th February, 2011 IBL