1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6276/2009 Jagdish Chandra VS State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER: 3.7.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. HR Chawla, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The contention of the petitioner is that identical writ petitions have been allowed by this Court with direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation for his posting as per the preference given by the petitioner. It is true that number of writ petitions have been allowed with direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners in those writ petitions seeking posting as per the preference given by the petitioners in those writ petitions. The petitioner admittedly is working on the post since Dec., 2007 and now he has filed the writ petition in the month of June, 2009 for the same relief. The writ petition of the petitioner is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner seeking his posting as per preference given by the petitioner and the State Government will be free to take into 2 account the delay while considering the petitioner's representation and may pass appropriate order. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-