1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. C.A.F.NO. 1900/2011 IN F.A.ST.NO.9601/2011. Manjiri Mohan Dhomne -VERSUS- Mohan Shankarrao Dhomne _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 21, 2011. Heard Shri S. Savdekar, learned Counsel for applicant and Shri U.A. Gosavi, learned Counsel for respondent. In First Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act preferred by the applicant/wife, there is a delay of 32 days. The learned counsel appearing for applicant states that being mentally disturbed and because of time required to withdraw money deposited by the respondent/husband in Court, the delay has occasioned. 2 Shri Gosavi, learned counsel for respondent is strongly opposing the prayer. He points out that the reason given in the application for condonation of delay is different and also false. The Family Court has granted decree of divorce to the respondent-husband on the ground that the applicant-wife is Schizophrenic and the illness cannot be cured. Similarly it has been held that cruelty is also established. In this situation, we are not in a position to find out any malafides in the matter. Hence, we condone the delay. Office to register the appeal and list the same for admission. Civil Application is accordingly allowed. JUDGE JUDGE Rgd