IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 44QZ of2008 Petitioner Manoj Singh, S/o Shri B. P. Singh, aged about 47 years, Working as Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council, Mancndragarh, District— Korea (Chhattisgarh) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development, Mantralaya, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). ’2. Municipal Council. Manendgarh, District Korea {Chhattisgarh}, Though: Chief Municipal OEicer, Municipal Councii, Manendragarh District Korea ( Chhattisgarh‘) 3. T. S. Sarthy, Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council, Gobranawapara. WRIT Pb l‘l’l‘IUN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF ’H‘IE CON S'lTi‘UTION OF INDIA SB: Honle Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) ( ’b Shii Sanjay K. Agarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate General with Ms Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.1. O R D E R (Passed on this 11m Day of August, 2008) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties the matter is heard finally. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not Want to press this petition on merits, at this stage. However, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the concerned authority Within a period ofthree days and the same may be directed to be considered and decided, in accordance with law. on its own merits, within the prescribed time. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State submits that if the representation is made, the same shall be considered and decided by the @ Cg concerned authorty, in accordance with la on its own merits, Withi a period of two weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. i w. n 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondentSXState further submits that no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner till the disposal of the representation. 5. Ihope and trust that the State Government shall examine the representation objectively, in accordance with law and guidelines, issued by the State Government, time to time. 6. in view of the foregoing. the petition stands disposed of, with the above stated liberty. i¥ Q_ i ‘4: 47' 1 Satish K. Agnihotrit Judge 'rhakur i i