arm/DO: W w.P.No. $9M; /2001 V, PETITIONER : S. P. Velma SIO Laf: Sri KC. Vanna aged about 40 3mm Occupation-Assistmt Labour Co ‘ sinner, Dar; R/O Plot No. 463 Steet 24, 8m Nagar, Durg. Vs. LThe State af Chhanisgarha Waugh the Sammy and Labour Commissiomr, Labour Department ,Room No‘ 1, DK Bhawan, Raipur. S.L. Jangre Assistant Labour Commissioner CIO’ our Conunis’oioner Govt. of CG. Gitanjali Na’gar, , ,b ' g5 Wren? Wm? W?! , \ MW 3a W, Em W 34W W mm}? mi?“w \PNogOI Q13 '7Z 01) (Mil ma wmiW WET 32‘ félz”: WK a; afatf em‘ 23/01/2003 k i Shn' K.M. Ansari and Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, counsel for § the petitionsr. 3 Shri Ranbir Singh, GA for the State/mspondent no. 1. Shri H.N. Vyas, counse} for mspondent no.2. Shn' A.S. Gahaxwar, ‘Sr. *ntml Government Standing Counsel for Union of India. Heald. Admittedly, the petitioner was pos§d at Durg from where he was transferxed to Raipur. The :gaid order was subject matter of challenge before the State Administrative ,Tn'blmal which upheld the same. ,Aggn'eved ther h the petitioner approached this Court which on 24/05/2001 irected that “the status quo as regards the service condition of the writ petitioner and respondent no.2 be maintained”. I.A.No.7058/ 2002 has b en med by respondent no. 1/ State for modihcation of the order dated 24/.05/ 2001 and for permitting the State to tran fer the petitioner. learned counsel for the petitioner that as the only question involved in this writ petition the order transferring the petiti er from Durg to Raipur, modihcan'on/vacation of the order in substance amount to the disposal of the writ petition. cordingly, he fairly stated that under the circumstances the writ petition itself may be > I. In reply, it is stated by [an 315$} e t y e c Xl-HCw22 Wm 3a W, 5m W mgm§m$ g3i 2% W axrém‘ w WWH mmmm ——’L’ an ahaia Ina—0’? 0r feet WA a: Wm 3m disyosed of. He, however, stated that since the academic session is coming to an end and 1he children of the petitioner are to appear in diEerent examinations, the petitioner may be permitted to remain at the present place of posting till 30/04l2003 and’ Whereafter he may be given any suitable posting. Thisprayer appears‘to be reasonable. In the above View of the matter and considering the fact that now a period of over two years has expired and that in exigency of service an odicer can be transferred, we dispose of this writ petition with a direction Tribunal stands modifled according] With the above obscrvau'ons, of. Consequently,_ I.A.Nos. 13 13/ 20( 5014/2001, 5532/2002 and M.w. disposed of. Sd/- P.-Naik Judge 7 Y. 15 Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge [tiiséfen that the petitioner may be permitted to remain at the present place of posting till 30/04/2003 and thereafter he may be given a suitable posting by way of transfer. The impugned arder of State Administrative this writ petition is disposed )1, 3114/2001, 5015/2001, P.No. 7058/2002 also stand C , , n