FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.484 OF 2009 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court s orders : ’ or directions and Registrar s’ : Court s or Judge s orders ’ ’ orders : _____________________________________________________________________________________ Ms.S.K.Gajre, APP for State CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 13th JANUARY, 2010. PC :- 1. Heard learned APP. Perused application and the order granting anticipatory bail. Upon notice to the respondent accused, they have filed a reply as well. Learned Judge has assigned reasons as to why anticipatory bail is granted. Complainant is brother of original applicant Nos. 2 and 4. Considering the long standing rivalry between parties, cross complaints and the injured being discharged from the hospital, the court was satisfied that no custodial interrogation is necessary. Beyond emphasising the need for such interrogation, nothing has been pointed out in support of this application for cancellation of bail. The principles while granting and cancelling bail are well settled. Applying them to the instant case, I do not deem it fit to interfere in my revisional jurisdiction with the order granting anticipatory bail. Revision application is rejected. (JUDGE)