IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 389 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: January 20, 2011 Sajid .. Petitioner Vs. Hari Parkash .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the execution proceedings as well as order dated 12.11.2010 (Annexure P3) passed by the trial court. The decree was passed against the petitioner three years back but he never complied with the same. No objection was raised against the attachment of the property. Now after the property was put to sale and the sale is about to be confirmed, he has filed the objection petition. As such this objection petition being belated and superfluous one cannot be maintained. Dismissed. January 20, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge