CRLMB6714/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.6714/2010 Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor Date of Order ::: 27.07.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Satish Khandal, Counsel for petitioner Shri Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor Shri Deepak Goyal, Counsel for complainant #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for complainant and perused the material made available to me during the arguments of the case. Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that all the injuries sustained by the injured Mukesh have been ultimately found to be simple in nature because there was no bony injury reported in the X-ray report. The petitioner is a student, who was arrested on 05.07.2010. Investigation is almost complete. The dispute took place between two neighbours, who are relatives. The petitioner himself received two injuries on his head and one on his hand, for which a cross-case was registered against the complainant party. There is no previous case registered against the petitioner. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for complainant opposed the bail application. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I deem it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner, namely, Vinod Kumar Son of Shri Ratan Lal on bail CRLMB6714/2010 // 2 // under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in FIR No.130/2010, Police Station Subhash Chowk, Jaipur, under Sections 143, 323 and 307, IPC, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sureties of Rs.15000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The bail application stands disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//