IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.1346 OF 200 CRI.APPLICATION NO.1346 OF 200 CRI.APPLICATION NO.1346 OF 2009 Harishchandra Narayan Khopate, .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra and anr. Respondents. Mr S.K.Raj, for the applicant. Mr J.P.Yagnik, APP, for the respondents-State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 06/04/200 DATE : 06/04/200 DATE : 06/04/2009 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondents-State. 2. The prosecution case is that deceased Manoj Solanki was assaulted by the present applicant and one Chhota Dalim with an iron rod and a wooden plank. I have perused statements of the complainant and one Prakash Fakkad, who are the eye-witnesses. They both have attributed specific overt acts to the applicant, who allegedly assaulted the deceased with a wooden plank on his head. Post Mortem report is consistent with the statements of the eye-witnesses and the cause of death mentioned by the Doctor is the head injuries. In the circumstances, there is prima facie material against the applicant to show his complicity. This is not a fit case to enlarge him on bail. The application is rejected. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)