IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3054/1996 KUM SUMAN KUSHANJI KHEDKAR ..VS.. REGIIONAL DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMN & ANOR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - None for the petitioner Shri B.N.Verma, advocate for R-2 Mrs. Deshmukh, AGP for R-1 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & P. B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : JUNE 7 , 2011 . None for the petitioner. Shri Verma for the respondent no.2 and Mrs. Deshmukh, the learned AGP for Respondent no.1. We see no infirmity in the impugned order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Nagpur Division Nagpur on 6.8.1996, dismissing the revision application filed by the petitioner and holding that the respondent no.2 had not committed any error in not reappointing the petitioner on the post of Assistant Teacher as there was no vacant post at the relevant time. It is necessary to note that the petitioner was appointed temporarily on ad-hoc basis only for a session and her services came to an end due to the efflux of time i.e. at the end of the session. In such circumstances, the Additional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur was justified in holding that the petitioner did not have a right to seek a reappointment on the post of Assistant Teacher after the end of the academic session. Since the impugned order passed by the respondent no.1 is just and proper, the writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE SMP