HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(5) Na. 2201 of 2007 Pei-moner Laxman Pradan 5/0 Gopim-th Pradm Aged about 57 Years, Pas? - Asst Teacher, R/o- Village- Bunbahai Tah. 61 Dist‘r. Raigurh (6,6,) Versus Resgondems ‘ 1. Shite of Chhaffisgwh Through : Secrefar'y 5chool Educa‘tion Departman'r D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (£26.) 2. Disfricf EducaTion Officer Raigar‘h, Dist : Raigarh- (C.6.) 3. Block Educafion Officer Biock - Raigarh Disfricf - Raigarh (6.6.) SB: Han’ble Mr. Jusfice Satish K. Agnihofri. Present Mr. Vivek Kumur Pandey, Advocafe for fhe pe‘rH-ioner. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Pond Lawyer for The Sfafe/respondenfs. OEDEk (Passed on fhis 10’“ Day of April, 2007') 1. The question of iaw involved herein asfo whether the petitioner is entitied to reguiar pay scale wef. the date of initiai appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that‘the facts and question of low involved the present writ petition are the some to that of in W. P. (5) No. 813/2007 (Rom Kumor Sahu andpothers vs. State Govt. of Chhottisgorh & another), which was allowed vide order dated 12.02.2007. 3. In View of the above—stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the some terms. No order as to costs. Subhosh i i y ‘ Sd/— atish K. Agnihotri Judge S /