1 92 fa.929.11 ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 929 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Atul Gatne for the Appellant. Mr. Ranjan Tripathi i/b Mr.S.S.Vidyarthi for Respondent No.4. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 10 th October, 2011. P.C. . The name of the Respondent No.3 has been deleted. The main challenge in the appeal is on the ground that the liability between two tort­feasors and their respective insurers has not been apportioned. The second ground is that the driver of the offending vehicle was a necessary party. The name of Respondent No.3 has been deleted. Therefore, the appeal cannot be disposed of finally at this stage as effect of deletion of the name of Respondent No.3 on the maintainability of the appeal will have to be examined. 2 92 fa.929.11 2 Admit. Printing is dispensed with. The learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.4 waives service. 3 Requisite number of copies of private paper­ books including the copies for the Respondent/s shall be filed by the Appellant/s within a period of one year from today. If compliance is not made within stipulated time, the appeal shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution without further reference to the Court. [ A.S.OKA, J ]