1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7843 OF 2009 Shri Saibaba Shikshan Sanstha, Shirgaon, Tal. Maval, Dist. Pune ...Petitioners v/s National Council for Teachers Education and others ...Respondents Mr A.V. Anturkar i/b Mr Sandip Pathak for Petitioners. Mr U.J. Warunjikar for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr S.N. Patil, AGP for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND A.R. JOSHI JJ. DATE : 20TH JANUARY 2010. 2 P.C. :- 1] The submission of the learned counsel appearing for petitioners so far as order dated 14th March 2009 is concerned is that by that order, the proposal submitted by the petitioners has not been rejected, only it is stated that no further process will be done in the matter. In our opinion, the fact that the authority is not going to further process the proposal means the proposal is rejected. The learned counsel appearing for petitioners states that the communication dated 14th March 2009 is a rejection, then he has a statutory remedy of apeal against that order. In view of the availability of the alternate remedy, petition is rejected. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary of this Court. Certified copy expedited. ( JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH ) ( JUSTICE A.R. JOSHI )