IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.16692 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: October 19, 2006 Randhir Singh and another ….Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ….. Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA PRESENT: Shri R.S.Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). Notice of motion to the respondents. On the asking of Court, Shri Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Copies of the writ petition have been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of directions to the respondents to reschedule the payment of the isntalments and interest and not to charge the interest till the basic amenities were provided to the petitioners and also to refund the interest on the amount already deposited by the petitioner. The petitioners have claimed that similar relief has been granted to many other persons who were identically situated. CWP NO.16692 of 2006 -2- After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the averments made by the petitioners in the present petition, we find that for redressal of their grievances, the petitioners have already filed a representation dated July 25, 2006 (Annexure P.4) which remains unresponded so far. In this view of the matter, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioners, we dispose of the present petition with a direction to the Administrator, Market Committee, Radaur, respondent No.3 to take a final decision on the aforesaid representation within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is received, by passing a detailed and speaking order. A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. (Viney Mittal) Judge October 19, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla) KD Judge