IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6912 of 2010 1. SONE LAL PASWAN S/O SHRI BASDEO PASWAN R/O VILL RASULPUR(VINU NAGAR), P.O.BIKHANPUR, UMAN NAGAR(NEAR SHRI KRISHNA MEDICAL COLLEGE), MUZAFFARPUR, AT PRESENT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT PROGRAMME COORDINATOR, DISTT-SARAN 2. UMESH KUMAR GUPTA S/O SHRI CHUN CHUN GUPTA R/O WARD NO.4, BIRPUR, DISTT-SUPAUL, AT PRESENT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT PROGRAMME CO-ORDINATOR, SAHARSA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY BIHAR, PATNA 2. DIRECTOR, BIHAR EDUCATION PROJECT COUNCIL BELTRON BHAWAN, SHASTRI NAGAR, PATNA 3. DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 02. 19.1.2011 Petitioners have been repatriated to their parent department by the impugned order contained in Annexure-1, which includes not only these petitioners but many persons. There is no dispute that the petitioners are actual employees of the Human Resource Development Department, Government of Bihar, who were on deputation to what is known as Bihar Education Project. Failure of the petitioners to demonstrate any legal infirmity in the impugned order or their right to continue on the post as such does not warrant any interference in the matter. Counsel for the petitioners submits that repatriation amounts to stigma but a perusal of the order does not show that there is any thing indicated or stated therein which will cast any aspersion or stigma on those two petitioners. Even otherwise repatriation does not seem to be limited to these petitioners but there are 22 other persons who have been dealt 2 with similarly. Petitioners have no legal right to continue on deputation. The repatriation to their parent department therefore does not warrant interference. Writ has no merit. It is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)