IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2004 Between: The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Secretary, Industries & Commerce Department, Govt. of A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad and others ..... APPELLANTS AND Sri Syed Ajmal Ahmed .....RESPONDENT The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2004 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari ) The Government preferred this Writ Appeal assailing the order dated 22.10.2003 passed by a learned Single Judge in W.P. No.11433 of 2003 allowing the same setting aside the impugned Memo No.9643/M.II(1)/2001-11 dated 14.5.2003 and entitling the respondent herein to carry on the quarry operations strictly in accordance with the Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 as long as assignment is in his favour subsists and as and when the said assignment is cancelled, it is open to the appellants herein to cancel the lease also. The said Memo rejects the Revision filed by the Writ Petitioner, respondent herein, challenging the deemed rejection of the renewal of assignment in his favour granted earlier. When this writ appeal is taken up for hearing, Mr. G.Raja Babu representing Smt. N.Shoba, learned counsel for the respondent herein submits that the respondent has surrendered his lease to the appellants. In view of this submission, since no lease exists as on today, no cause of action survives warranting adjudication. Recording these submissions, the Writ Appeal is closed as no further orders are necessary. No order as to costs. _____________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari __________________ Justice Sanjay Kumar December 17, 2009 MAS