1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Criminal Application No.3198 of 2007 Sunil Devaji Jadhav Applicant Vs. Smt. Renuka Krushna Rao & anr. Respondents Mr.Balasaheb Deshmukh for applicant. Mr.A.A.Joshi for resp.no.1. Mr.P.A.Pol, APP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. October 4, 2007. P.C. . Heard Mr.Deshmukh, the learned counsel for the applicant. Both the parties are present in the Court. By this application filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. the applicant prays for quashing of the proceedings in Criminal Case No.92 of 2006 registered by the Agripada Police Station, on the basis of the settlement between the applicant and the respondent no.1 reached on or about 27th September 2007. . The applicant was married to Sunita, daughter of the present respondent no.1 on 22/4/2001. Sunita met an unnatural death on 29/4/2006 and C.R.No.92/2006 was registered against the applicant no.1 at the instance of the respondent no.1 on 1/5/2006 for the offences punishable under Sections 2 498-A and 306 of IPC. However, during the pendency of the said complaint the parties appear to have reconciled and the respondent no.1 executed an affidavit on 27/9/2007 stating that she filed the complaint on hearsay allegations and she did not wish to continue with the case any further. A copy of the said affidavit is placed on record. . The respondent no.1 is present in the Court and she has confirmed that she affirmed the affidavit on 27/9/2007. In the said affidavit she has given consent for quashing of the proceedings in C.R.No.92/2006 registered by the Agripada Police Station at Mumbai. The applicant is also present in the Court. Both the counsel, therefore, pray for quashing the proceedings as prayed for in prayer clause (a). . Hence the application is allowed and C.R.No.92/2006 registered by the Agripada Police Station at Mumbai is hereby quashed. (B.H.MARL