I $-3&4 * tN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + w.P.(cRL) 1888/2010 ARUN KUMAR AGGARWAL &ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Kohliand Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate VCTSUS STATE & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akshay Bipin, ASC for State with Sl Renuka Mr. Vinay Gupta and Mr. Vikas Khurana, Advocate for complainant AND + W.P.(CRL) 1889/2010 ARUN KUAMR AGGARWAL ORS' .'... PEtitiONCT Through: Mr. R.K. Kohli and Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate VETSUS STATE & ANR. ..... Respondent C Mr. Akshay Bipin, ASC for State with Sl Renuka Mr. Vinay Gupta and Mr. Vikas Khurana, Advocate for complainant CORAM: JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA ORDER % 24.01.2011 These two petitions have been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.4 of 2010 under Sections 3251341t34 IPC registered with police station lP Estate, New Delhi and FIR No.275 of 2009 under Sections 4061498N34 IPC registered with police station Janak Puri, New Delhi and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the ground that the parties have inter se compromised the matter. Since the disputes stand settled between the parties and a sum of Rs.1,40,000/- has been paid by the petitioners to the complainant as per terms of compromise (in FIR No.275 of 2009) and both the complainants present in Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Signature Not Verified f-.r /\/ \./ the court, being identified by their counser, Mr. Vinay Gupta, conceMhe compromise,boththepetitionsareallowedandtheFlRNo.4of20l0under sections 325t341t341PC registered with police station lP Estate' New Delhiand F|RNo.275of2009underSections406/4984/34|Pcregisteredwithpolice stationJanakPuri,NewDe|hiandtheconsequentia|Proceeflinosemanating U therefrom are herebY quashed' I ^^ 1JlX,/ SHIV NARAVAru ONIruCRI"I JANUARY 24,2011 rd L'J (}