J BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OFCH‘HyATTI‘sGARH AT BILASP ‘ WRITVPETITION-(22‘7) No.44 239‘ /2009 PETITIoNERs ‘ DEFENDANTs _ A/ Smt. Duti Bai, widow or Iate~ i Narjsingh aged‘about 47 years, r WRIT PETITION U/A 227‘OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA; ' - 7. ‘ :7 ........... @ UR 2; V Shahkar Ram 'sori of Late Narsinh aged about 35 years KhemrajV' son of‘.Late Narsingh, _ aged about 2'5’years / Pitambar son‘of Narsingh, aged ‘about 23 years, ‘,M_us. Kalawati D/o Narsingh, age‘d‘ about 32 years y ‘ Mus Tilo‘ Bai D/o Narsingh, aged about 3'0 years, ’ ‘ All areresident of vill Rampur, Tah Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh(CG) _ _ EVVERsus RESPONDENTS ‘ ‘ _ t /1‘. _ ,;BUdhram son of Dayaramy aged WK 5v W “ 52years occupation‘Cultivation'and I a / _ ,s ‘ -p‘etjttion writer R/o Vill_ Lipti ah’. @XoCmk‘? Dharamjaigarh, ) DisttuRa’igar'hrcsp /2. State' of Chhattisgarh, through the ‘ ‘ District gColiector — Raigarh ,(Proforma respondent) 'g r n: Hon”. \snkr’Jus'rwE N. . AGARWA “17-8-2009 Shri A.N. Bhakta, Advo ats, for the petitioner. Shn' P.K. Bhaduri, Pan Lawyer, for the State. Shn 'Bhaktat' submits with a direction to the Co at this revision may be disposed of below to permit the peu'tioner for making consequential amend ent in pursuance of the impugned order. The submission is fair. . Therefore, the petition i disposed ofwith a direction that the trial Court shall permit the etih'oner to make an application for consequential amendment an1i if the petitioner makes it befom the trial Court, then the trial Coiirt shall decide the aame on its own merit in accordance with law. i7 o i Sdl- kl: N.K. Agrawal ‘ Judge s L