IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42086 of 2010 1.SITA DEVI wifeof late Domi Sah 2.Shailendra Yadav, son of Sukhadeo Yadav, Both resident of village- Belari, P.S. Kumarkhand( Belari O.P), District Madhepura ......petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR O.P. ----------- 2 26.11.2010 Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution registered under sections 436, 379 and some other minor or bailable offences under the Indian penal Code, the petitioners are named in the FIR as accused. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the informant Urmila Devi and petitioner no.1 Sita Devi are Gotani (sisters-in-law) belonging to the same family and there was some previous dispute going on between them. It is further highlighted that during the course of investigation the independent witnesses have not supported the prosecution case regarding arson. The prosecution case was supported only with respect to minor offences. He further submitted that some land disputes are going on between the informant at one side and the accused persons on the other side. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below, the above 2 named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Madhepura in connection with Kumarkhand (Belari O.P) P.S. Case no. 113 of 2010 subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. M.Rahman ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J )