1 S. B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1110/2006 SMT. BHANWARI MIRDHA V. THE STATE & OTHERS. DATE OF ORDER :::: 12/03/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI Mr. G.R.Punia, for Petitioner (s). Mrs. R.R.Kanwar, Addl. G.A. By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order of suspension dated 26.11.2005 (Annexure-4), as well as the order of transfer. This Court, while admitting the petition on 27.4.2006, stayed the operation of the order Annexure-5, i.e., order of transfer/change of Headquarters. By virtue of the said order, the Headquarters of the petitioner remained at Bikaner, during the period of suspension. This Court, thereafter, passed another order dated 21.2.2008, directing the respondents to complete the inquiry by 12.3.2008. Learned counsel for the respondents today informs that the disciplinary inquiry in the matter has already been completed. It has also been submitted that necessary order pursuant to the inquiry would also be passed within two weeks from date of receipt 2 of the copy of the order. In view of the above facts and circumstances, since the inquiry has already been completed and final order is going to be passed, within a period of two weeks, it is futile to adjudicate the issue of suspension, inasmuch as, while passing the final order pursuant to the discipolinary inquiry, respondents would necessarily pass order in regard to the period of suspension also. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the directions to the respondents that final order pursuant to the disciplinary inquiry be passed within two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order and if the petitioner is exonerated or given minor punishment then consequential benefit of the period of suspension should also be given to the petitioner within a shortest possible time. However, if the respondents take a different view while passing the final order in disciplinary inquiry, they are directed to pass order even in regard to the treatment of the period of suspension. It is made clear that if any adverse order is passed against the petitioner, then she 3 would be at liberty to challenge the same on the issues which are raised herein and otherwise to be taken after passing of the final order. The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. scd ( M. N. BHANDARI ), J.