IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12772 of 2008 LALTESHWAR SINGH @ LALITESH KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 15.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Complaint case in which cognizance has been taken only under Sections 323, 409, 420, 468 and 504 of the Penal Code. The submission is that the money in question was paid to co-accused Brajesh Kumar, who is alleged to have granted fictitious receipt in question and deposited the lesser amount against the complainant’s loan account. The petitioner allegedly abused him. Cognizance has not been taken on a commonality of interest under Section 120B or 34 of the Penal Code. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R.C. Prasad, Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nalanda in Complaint case No. 130(C)/2004. AKS (Navin Sinha, J.)