IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2010 / 8TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 11114 of 2010(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- M/S.CHAMAKKALAYIL SILKS, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT CHAMAKKALAYIL SILKS, MUNNANI, KEEZHTHADIYUR P.O., PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.SUBRAMANIAM SRI.M.S.NARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALA POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALA POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 4. THE KOTTAYAM JILLA SHOP AND OTHER ESTABLISHMENT MAZDOOR SANGH, B.M.S. OFFICE, T.B.JUNCTION, M.L.ROAD, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI T.K. VIPINDAS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C).NO.11114 OF 2010 L PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER, PALA. EXT.P2TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT UNION. EXT.P3TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT UNION. EXT.P4TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE POLICE AUTHORITIES. EXT.P5TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH TAKEN ON 28.03.2010. EXT.P6TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. // True Copy // PS to Judge K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. -------------------------------------------------- W.P(C). NO. 11114 OF 2010 L --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th June, 2010 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. The Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief: “Issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 to render necessary assistance and police protection to the petitioner firm, its employees and customers from the obstruction caused by the members of the 4th respondent Union, so as to enable the petitioner firm to conduct and carry on its business.” 2. We have already passed an interim order. Though served, there is no appearance for the fourth respondent. In such circumstances, we make the interim order absolute. We make it clear that it will be open to the members of the fourth respondent to resort to peaceful agitation and take up their WPC.NO.11114/2010 L 2 complaints before the appropriate Forum also. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge