THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.No. 4626 OF 2009 ORAL ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the orders of the learned I Addl. Rent Controller-cum-XIII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in I.A.No. 34 of 2009 in O.S.No. No. 4872 of 2002, dated 18.8.2009. Brief facts of the revision are that: The petitioner herein is the petitioner-defendant and the respondent herein is the respondent-plaintiff before the learned trial Court in O.S.No. 4872 of 2002. Before the learned trial Court, the petitioner has filed I.A.No. 34 of 2009 to reopen the case and to recall the PW1 for further cross- examination at the time of arguments. After hearing both the sides, the learned trial Court has dismissed the said petition. Challenging the said order of the learned trial Court, the present Civil Revision Petition has been preferred by the unsuccessful petitioner-defendant. Heard both sides. As can be seen from the order under revision that the petition filed by the petitioner is in a suit of 2002 for reopening of the case and to recall the P.W.1 and that too when the matter is posted for arguments. The learned trial Court has dismissed the said petition observing that no purpose will be served once the evidence is completed. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into consideration the fact that the matter is of the year 2002, I feel that the petition filed by the petitioner is only to protract the proceedings and no purpose will be served, even if the matter is reopened. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is not maintainable and the same is dismissed. _______________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J 8.10.2009 CHV