IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25759 of 2010 PAPPU YADAV S/O PARMANAND YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 25.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 341, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. By an order dated 2.8.2010 the application was ordered to be listed on 20.9.2010 with the obvious intent to grant bail to the petitioner and thereafter on 8.10.2010 a report was called for by the Trial Court about the present stage of trial unless that till 7.8.2010 five witnesses have been examined but the informant has not been examined as yet. Considering the aforesaid facts as also that the petitioner is in custody since 5.8.2009, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any 2 other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge F.T.C. No. 5, Khagaria in connection with Sessions Case No. 138/2010 arising out of Khagaria P.S. Case No. 107/2009, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father-in-law of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )