1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 43 OF 2007 Abdul Sattar s/o Abdul Gafur and others ...Appellants Versus Digambar s/o Sambhaji Puyed ...Respondent ..... Mr. S.V. Mundhe, advocate for the appellants ..... CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 6TH OCTOBER, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 This appeal From Order is filed aggrieved by the order dated 10.11.2006 passed below Exh.6 in Special Civil Suit No. 103 of 2006. By the impugned order, application Exh.6 filed by the original plaintiffs came to be allowed in appeal. The respondent herein who is original defendant was restrained from alienating the suit land to any other person prior and after obtaining the required permission under the provisions of law for time being in force, till disposal of the suit. 2 Though the respondent is served, however, none appears for him. To enable the counsel for the respondent, the matter was kept 2 back, however, even in second round none appears for the respondent. 3 During pendency of this appeal, this Court has directed the parties to maintain status quo, as obtained on 29.3.2007. Since there is nothing on record filed on behalf of the respondent to oppose this Appeal from Order or the counsel appearing for the respondent is also not present when the matter is taken up for final hearing, I have heard learned counsel appearing for the appellants and also perused the impugned judgment and order passed by the court below. The grounds taken in the appeal memo are not controverted on behalf of the respondent. This Appeal from Order is disposed of by confirming the interim order passed by this court on 29.3.2007. It is made clear that,the order of status quo passed by this Court on 29.3.2007 will remain in operation till final disposal of the suit. 4 Appeal from order is disposed of in the above terms. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) rlj/