sanjay 1 580.11-appa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 580 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 358 OF 2011 Mr.Subhash Chandrakant Wagmare. ... Appellant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Rahul M. More for the applicant. H.J.Dedhia, A.P.P. for the respondent- State. CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE & A. M. THIPSAY, JJ. DATED : 6th May 2011. P.C. : Heard Mr.More, learned counsel for the applicant who seeks to challenge the order dated 10th November 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad at Alibag in Sessions Case No. 176/2007 thereby rejecting the prayer of the applicant for return of muddemal property and instead the Court has directed that the muddemal property of the applicant be sent to the Mint and the mobile has been directed to be auctioned. This appeal [Criminal Appeal (St.) No. 358/2011] is restricted for the rejection of the muddemal property of sanjay 2 580.11-appa gold. However, the appeal has been filed belatedly and as per the office note it is beyond time by 96 days. Hence this application for condonation of delay. 2. We are satisfied that the delay caused has been properly explained and deserves to be condoned. 3. Hence the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (A. M. THIPSAY, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)