IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8180 of 2011 AFZAL MIAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 05.04.2011 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Chawk P.S. Case No. 33 of 2009 registered under Sections 386, and 341/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that the petitioner and others were asking to handover a cartoon of wine on the threat of life. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no transaction taken place, hence the case may be at best under Section 385 of the I.P.C. Even on the submission of the counsel for the petitioner the anticipatory bail is not maintainable because prima facie it appears to be a case under Section 385 of the I.P.C. Let the learned Court-below pass appropriate order with regard to the regular bail application of the petitioner without being prejudice to the order of this Court. Keeping in 2 mind that prima facie case under Section 385 of the I.P.C. is made out others have been granted regular bail and informant has retracted from initial version. Mkr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)