CWP No.9926 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No.9926 of 2011 Date of decision August 25, 2011 Rajwinder Kaur .......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present: Mr. Kanwaljit Singh , Senior Advocate with Ms. Sukhwinder Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?No K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The petitioner's prayer is that she must be directed to put up construction in her own property which has been declared to be belonging to her in the litigation that has gone up to Supreme Court and obtained finality. The petitioner has serious apprehensions that some of the officers themselves would cause harassment. 2. If the petitioner has any genuine apprehension about her safety, the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the third respondent who will consider her request and give appropriate protection to enforce the Civil Court decree that she has obtained against the State of Punjab through Collector and the Executive Engineer, Gurdaspur. 2. Learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that she has already given a representation to the CWP No.9926 of 2011 2 Deputy Commissioner and Senior Superintendent of Police seeking for protection. The said representation be properly considered and the needful be done in accordance with law. 3. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 25, 2011 archana