IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10523 of 2008 SUNIL KUMAR @ SONU SRIVASTAVA, S/O SRI B.P. SRIVASTAVA, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO.19, FLAT NO.5, EAST PATEL NAGAR, P.S. SHASHTRI NAGAR, DISTT. PATNA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.6.2010. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, Smt. Indu Bala Pandey, learned Additional Public Prosecutor is appearing on behalf of the State. The sole petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of order dated 30.1.2008 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Patna in Criminal Revision No.484 of 2007/137 of 2007. By the said order, the learned Additional Sessions Judge has rejected the Cr. Revision, which was preferred against the rejection of discharge petition. By order dated 21.7.2007, the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna had rejected the discharge petition of the petitioner. After rejection of revision petition in the garb of filing a quashing application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 2 N.H./ virtually, the petitioner filed second petition, which is not permissible, which is barred under Section 397(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Moreover, on the ground of merit also, there is nothing on record to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)