- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION No.466 OF 2006 APPLICATION No.466 OF 2006 APPLICATION No.466 OF 2006 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER No.374 OF 2006 Prabhulal Lalji Thakkar & Anr.... Applicant Vs. Jayesh Lalji Nandu & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. R. A. Thorat, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. Geeta Joglekar, Advocate for the Respondent No.3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : D. G. KARNIK, J. : D. G. KARNIK, J. : D. G. KARNIK, J. DATE DATE DATE : SEPTEMBER 7, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 7, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 7, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The prayer in the Civil Application is too wide. The appellant seeks to restrain respondents from carrying out any business in the suit premises. In my view, this relief cannot be granted. All businesses which can be carried without by obtaining licence under Sec. 394 of Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, can be carried on. In the circumstances, Civil Application is rejected. [ D. G. KARNIK, J. ] D. G. KARNIK, J. ] D. G. KARNIK, J. ]