HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.19061 OF 2011 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to declare the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not taking action on the representations made by the petitioner and other villagers on 31.3.2011, 4.5.2011, 8.6.2011 and 13.6.2011 as per the provisions of A.P. Municipalities Act and the Rules made thereunder (for short, the Act and Rules), inspite of the endorsement made by the 5th respondent dated 10.6.2011 and 13.6.2011 as illegal and arbitrary and in contravention of the Act and Rules made thereunder and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to act on the representations made by the petitioner and other villagers and take a decision about the illegal and unauthorised constructions being made by the respondents 3 and 4 behind Vijayasree Lodge and behind the residential house of the Dr. Lokireddy Anjaneyulu Reddy at Piduguralla, Guntur District, as per the provisions of the Act and Rules. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondents 1 and 2. 3. It is stated that the respondents 3 and 4 are making construction of multi storied building in contravention of the permission which was granted in their favour without leaving set backs on South, West and Northern sides, that one G.V. Rao made an application under Right to Information Act, 2005 on 31.3.2011 requesting the 1st respondent to furnish the information with regard to the permission which was obtained by the 3rd respondent, that as the respondents 3 and 4 are making constructions in contravention of the sanctioned plan, the petitioner gave representations to the respondents on 31.3.2011, 4.5.2011, 8.6.2011 and 13.6.2011, but no action has been taken by the respondents 1 and 2. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that even though the petitioner gave several representations to the respondents 1and 2 about the illegal constructions made by the respondents 3 and 4, no action has been taken by the authorities, and hence he prays to allow the writ petition. 5. The grievance of the petitioner is that the building is constructed in contravention of the sanctioned plan, that the respondents 1 and 2 have to verify the same whether the building is constructed in accordance with the sanctioned plan or not. Therefore, an appropriate decision has to be taken on the representations made by the petitioners. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, especially in view of the pendency of the representations of the petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate decision on the representations made by the petitioner after giving reasonable opportunity to all the parties within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner. If the representations of the petitioner are not available, the petitioner is directed to submit a fresh representation to the respondents 1 and 2 within two weeks from today. No order as to costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU,J. 29.10.2011, Gk. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.19061 OF 2011 Date:29.10.2011 Gk.