IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.78 of 2009 1. ABDUL NAYEEM KHAN son of Late Mirzan Khan, 2. Bibi Khairatun daughter of late Samtali Khan, Both residents of Village Ranipur, P.O. Moglanya, Dist. East Champaran, Bihar. . . . . . Petitioners. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari 3. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Pakridayal, At & P.O. Pakridayal, Dist. East Champaran. 4. Kulsum Begum Wife of Md. Alam Khan, Resident of Village Jogaulia, Tola- Gulab Khan, P.S. Madhuban, District- East Champaran. 5. The Superintendent of Police, East Champaran at Motihari. 6. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Pakridayal, At & P.O. Pakridayal, Dist. East Champaran. 7. The Officer-in-charge, Madhuban, District East Champaran (Respondents). . . . . . Opposite Parties. ----------- 8/ 17.02.2010 Heard. The instant application has been filed for reviewing the order dated 13.08.2008 passed in Cr.W.J.C. No. 346 of 2007. The aforesaid writ application bearing Cr.W.J.C. No. 346 of 2007 was filed by Kulsum Begum against the State of Bihar and others. In the aforesaid case, the petitioner stated that the land contained in Annexure-3 therein, was auction purchased by her father namely Md. Mumtaz Alam Khan. The auction purchase was challenged in a suit, which was decreed in favour of her father by judgment and decree dated 06th September, 1965, in Second Appeal No. 456 of 1963. Kulsum Beguam, who has been made opposite party no.4 states that some strangers are creating hindrance in enjoyment of the property and she has even filed a Partiion Suit bearing no. 467 of - 2 - 2002. This Court relying upon judgment of the Apex Court in the case of P. R. Murlidharan and others reported in (2006) 4 SCC 501 has observed that if the petitioner files an application in this respect, the respondent authorities will take all steps to ensure peaceful cultivation and harvesting of the crops on the land scheduled in Annexure-3. The petitioner has filed an application for reviewing the aforesaid order disputing the case of opposite party no.4 Kusum Devi. After hearing the parties, this Court does not find sufficient ground for reviewing the order. However, it will be open to the petitioner to approach any appropriate forum for their grievances. With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)