T -!-^^ IC^ ^ss^" ^&LIB""" ».»--::.^0^""""" ^"^^' (^yje^^ '^••""" BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. YC) N0.! ^ 2-^/2008 PETITIONER : Vinod Kumar Gupta, S/o Chhaththu Sao, aged about 45 years, Occupation Footpath , Businessman, and also president of Surguja Sahari Footpath Vyapari Sangh Ambikapur, R/o Namnakala Ambikapur Distt. Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS /: 1. State of Chhattisgarh: Through Secretary Urban administration D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.), ^ 2. Cotlector Ambikapur Distt. Surguja (C.G.), (^.3. Municipal Corporation: Through Commissioner Ambikapur Distt. Surguja (C.G.), / 4. Chief Municipal Officer Munidpal Corporation Ambikapur Distt. Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF THE SUITABLE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE MATTER. ___— ^ -l'^. \s^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILA5PUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 1422 of2008 PETITIONER : Vinod KumarGupta VERSUS RESPONDENT8 : State ofChhattisgarh & Others \VRITPETmON U^DER AR'HCLE 226 OF THE CONSnTUTION OFWD1A SB: Hon'tole Shri Satish K. Asmhotri, J. Present: Shri Sunil Tripathi, Advocate fbr the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer forthe State. Shii Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate for the respondent No.3. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 2"a day of August, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on insteiictions, submits fhat the prayer sought for in this petition has already been satisfied and, as such, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication and the petition has become infmctuous, to which leamed counsel appeai'mg for the respondents have no objection. 2. In view ofthe above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infmctuous. i Satish K. Agnihotri 1 Judge Gov^ri