IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO.1337 OF 2004 Sunita Prabhakar Godhave & Ors. ...Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. Anuj Narula i/b. J Narula & Associates for the Petitioners. Mr. Milind More, A. G. P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 3. Mr. S. G. Surana for Respondent No.2. ..... CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI,C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. July 30th, 2004. P.C.: The Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the eligibility of Petitioner No.14 has not been determined by the respondents. The Learned Counsel for the second respondent undertakes to decide about the eligibility of Petitioner No.14 within four weeks from today. No further directions are necessary. In case the eligibility of Petitioner No.14 is not decided within the stipulated period, the Petitioner would be at liberty to revive the petition. The Learned Counsel for the Petitioners fairly submits that he is not pressing for interim relief as he is already protected by the order of the Appellate Authority. In this view of the matter, interim relief granted by this Court is vacated. The Petition is disposed of. Certified copy expedited. CHIEF JUSTICE DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.