IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12208 of 2009 SHAILENDRA KISHORE MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Though the allegation is controverted but ultimate submission is made on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner that agreement was there for running a joint business in which petitioner is shown as active partner. It is alleged that without giving the share of the complainant, the business was closed. According to learned counsel, for the same thing, a complaint was filed which was dismissed. Then again the complainant filed the present case. However, civil liability is also made out basing which petitioner’s arrest cannot be justified. I agree with the submission. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Mashrak P.S.Case No.113 of 2003, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI