IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9094 of 2009 Ramji Prasad @ Ramji Prasad Yadav, son of Late Halkki Prasad, resident of Village-Chitrakut Nagar, Road No.9A, P.O. Digha, P.S. Danapur, District-Patna……..Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The D.G.-cum-I.G. of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Senior S.P., Patna. 4. The Director Provident Fund, Bihar, Patna. 5. The District Account/Provident Fund Officer, Patna. 6. The A.G., Bihar, Patna. ………………….Respondents. ----------- 2. 03. 08. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to payment of Provident Fund dues. It is submitted that petitioner has not received G.P.F. dues till date despite representing the matter. Learned counsel for the State submits that in case petitioner files a separate representation stating details of his claim, the same shall be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his claim, petitioner proposes to file a representation before Respondent No. 5. In case, such representation is filed along with relevant documents in support thereof as also certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today, Respondent No. 5 shall consider and dispose of the grievance 2 of the petitioner regarding payment of Provident Fund dues in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that admitted dues regarding Provident Fund could be settled with statutory interest, if any. With the above observations/directions, the writ application is disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)