IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 3rd day of March, 2008 First Bail Application No. 79 of 2008 Criminal Side Arun Kumar S/o Chandra Pal Singh, R/o Singh Colony, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. …….. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party Arising out of Crime No. 87 of 2007 Under Section: 304-B I.P.C. P.S.: Ranipur, District: Haridwar. __________________________________________________________ Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Heard Smt. Pushpa Joshi, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Government Advocate for the State. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, even though I feel disinclined to grant any relief to the petitioner / applicant in this petition, I do feel that, in the facts and circumstances of this case, a direction is required to be issued qua the respondent State to produce and conclude the recording of the main prosecution evidence in the Trial Court very very expeditiously. While disposing of this petition, I order and direct that the prosecution shall produce and conclude the recording of the main PWs before 31st May, 2008. If this is not done, the petitioner / applicant would be at liberty to approach this Court again in the first week of June, 2008. If, however, the aforesaid direction is complied with, the petitioner / applicant would be at liberty to file a fresh bail application in the Trial Court immediately on the conclusion of the recording of the main prosecution evidence, in which case, the learned Trial Court shall consider and dispose of the fresh bail application in the light of the evidence, which has been brought on record till then. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 03.03.2008 G