IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 24601 of 2007 Between: Pandi Satyanarayana, S/o.Chandra Rao, R/o.S.Ramanapalem(V), Devipatnam(M),E.G Dist ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Agent to the Govt. E.G Dist at Kakinada 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Devipatnam, East Godavari Dist 3 The Station House Officer, Devipatnam P.S. Devipatnam,E.G Dist 4 Pendi Latchnna, S/o.Seethayya, R/o.S.Ramannapalem(V), Devipatnam(M),E.G Dist 5 Pendi Venkanna, S/o.Latchanna, R/o.S.Ramannapalem(V), Devipatnam(M),E.G Dist 6 Pendi Durgamma, S/o.Latchanna, R/o.S.Ramannapalem(V), Devipatnam(M),E.G Dist 7 Pendi Venkatesulu S/o.Seethayya, R/o.S.Ramannapalem(V), Devipatnam(M),E.G Dist .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.VENKATESH Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2: G.P. FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel for Respondent No.3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for Respondent Nos.4 to 7: ---- The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.3, in not giving proper protection to enable the petitioner to cultivate his lands admeasuring Hec.1.26 in Survey Nos.126/1 to 126/3 of S.Ramannapalem Village, Devipatnam Mandal, East Godavari District, as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, Sri K.Venkatesh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that as respondent Nos.4 to 7 were unduly interfering with the petitioner’s possession of the abovementioned land, the petitioner filed O.S.No.10 of 2004 before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mobile Court, Rampachodavaram, and that the said suit was decreed by the said Court by Order dated 17-04-2006 wherein respondent Nos.4 to 7 were restrained from interfering with the petitioner’s possession of the abovementioned land. In my considered view, the appropriate remedy for the petitioner is to approach the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mobile Court, Rampachodavaram, who granted the injunction in favour of the petitioner, for enforcement of the said order of injunction by seeking appropriate directions to the Police. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy mentioned above before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mobile Court, Rampachodavaram. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.32024 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 3rd June, 2008 LUR