IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5024 of 2010 GAGAN KUMAR THAKUR, S/o Sri Chandra Kant Thakur. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 05.03.2010 This case has come under the heading “To be Mentioned” at the instance of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had been granted bail on 22.02.2010 on condition that he would give an affidavit in the court below that he is not accused in any other case. It could not be pointed out due to inadvertence that it had been stated in paragraph 6 of the petition that for the same occurrence the petitioner had been remanded in another case and therefore the said condition was not required. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is a student of matriculation and there is no time left to go through the entire process of re- filing the bail application since the examination starts from today and he would miss an entire year for this mistake. Under the circumstances, I modify the order dated 22.02.2010 to the extent that the condition for - 2 - bail will be (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Let this order be communicated through FAX to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur (Madhubani) in connection with Jhanjharpur P.S. Case No. 99 of 2009 at the cost of the petitioner. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)