IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1211 of 2008 MADHUSUDAN PATHAK SON OF LATE RAMJI PATHAK, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA F/2, AYODHYAPURI, SRI NAGAR, POLICE STATION SIWAN, MOFFASIL, DISTRICT SIWAN. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY CUM-COMMISSIONER, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE SECRETARY CUM COMMISSIONER FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR POLICE LBUILDING CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, PATNA. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, POLICE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR, CAMP AT HAZIPUR. 6. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, POLICE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION SUB- DIVISION CHAPARA. ----------- 2. 22.12.2009. The petitioner claims to have been re- engaged after superannuation on certain specified amount which has also been denied to him. Petitioner is stated to have represented for the same on 20.10.2003. This Court upholds the objection of the State with regard to the belated and stale nature of the claim in so far as the maintainability of the writ application is concerned. Any disposal of the representation of the petitioner by the respondents in their wisdom shall remain circumscribed ‘by the limitations laid down by the Supreme Court’ in 2008(10) S.C.C. 115 in so far as the rights of the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution upon any orders on such representation are concerned. - 2 - N.H./ Let the respondents dispose the representation expeditiously. ( Navin Sinha,J.)