IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22923 of 2010 PRAMOD YADAV @ KARI YADAV, SON OF LATE BIRANCHI YADAV. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04 10.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 351 of 2009 registered under Sections 25(1-B) A, 26(ii), 35 of the Arms Act and Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code. No doubt, petitioner is in jail custody for more than one year, but as per prosecution case, one country made loaded pistol and two live cartridges as well as one stolen motorcycle were recovered from possession of the petitioner. Para 86 of the case diary shows that petitioner carries criminal antecedent of several cases. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of bail to petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected. However, learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within six months from the date of receipt of this order, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)