IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL WRIT No. 2605 of 2007 SUSHIL KUMAR & ANR. V/S A.D.J.(F.T.),NO.2 ,BHILWARA & ORS. Mr. RK CHARAN & Mr. BS CHARAN, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 18.5.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, perused the impugned order. By the application under Order 14, Rule 5 CPC, the petitioner has suggested framing of two additional issues being one, as to whether the signatures of defendant No.1 & 2 were obtained on loan documents and other blank forms and the other issue suggested as to whether the defendants were ever informed about the status of outstanding amount of the bank. The learned trial Court has found, and I also do feel that the controversy sought to be covered by the first issue is merely rebuttal of existing issue No.2, however it is further expressly clarified that the petitioner will be able to prove the averments sought to be covered by the proposed issue No.1 by way of rebuttal of Issue No.2. The learned counsel does not press the other proposed issue. In that view, I do not find any ground to interfere in the impugned order. The writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid clarifications. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /jpa