H§Gi€ GGURT OF CHHA??§SGARH AT B§LASPI§R DIV§$i0N EENCH C’oram : HQN’ELE SHRI RAJEEV GSJPTA, CJ. & HONgBL’E S§-§R! SUML KUMAR SINHA, J. W.?.iC§. No, 4&8 0? 29-96 Aadim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiw Dumardih, Fah’ Price Shep Patera Tahsi¥ - Lundra, Qhourpur; Dismct —- surgu§a {CG) Thraugh Saiesman, (Authorizeci by Manager); $h‘avkashwar Prasad Gupta Sfo Shri Ram!a§ Gupta, Age about 43 Years, R/o Wiage — Patora, Tahsi: - Lundra; Dhourpur, Sistt — Surguja; (CG) FzETiTmwER Versus RESPONDEN?$ 1. Siam of Chhattisgwh Thfough — VSecretary, Department ef Feed Puma Disiribution and Consumer Protection. Mant‘ralaya? DK‘S. Bhawan, Raipur (6.8.) ,Coaectof, Surguia: Disirict : Surguja {c.G.) 3. Sub —- Evieiona! OE’ficer, Ambikapur, District ~ surgug'a, {CG} 2. WEE? PETI’?‘mi\i WA 226122? OF THE {zG’NSTHUTaGN OF iNBiA Present: Peiitioneyie coun'sei absent. ShrE Yaehwant 3ingh Thakur‘ ieamed Deputy Advooa‘te Generai for the $ta‘te. {} R § E g {23w Magma 2&3}, "me following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupia, (£J. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, ieamed Oeputy Advocate (Senerai submits that as aii the issues raised in this Wfit petiticn have a?ready been féna§éy decided vide order dated {39.83.2ae‘i: passed m WP. Na5265/2GO6 and other cennecied petiiions, now nething suwives for dec§s§on in this writ petmon. 2) in ihis View of the matter, the Wm petiiion ie _ ‘w i dismissed a$infmctuoue 3? 3) Consequentiyl the interim Order ciated 28.08.2m6 i \ 2; KS3; Sd!‘ Sunu Smha . Chief Justice i Judgear Subbu