IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 8949 of 2003 Between: CHAND PASHA, S/O.KHAIRATH ALI, 22-1-1100/1, MOOSI NAGAR, CHADARGHAT, HYDERABAD. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 THE GOVT. OF A.P., REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELO- PMENT DEPT., SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2 THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, HYDERABAD. 3 THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF HYDERABAD, TANK BUND, HYDERABAD. 4 THE HYDERABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY REP.BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, POLICE LANE, BEGUMPET, HYDERABAD. 5 THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND ACQUISITION (GENERAL), HYDERABAD. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to To issue an order or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring action of the respondents in issuing 4(1) notification dated 17-3-2000 as was published in Eenadu Telugu Daily Newspaper is wholly illegal arbitrary, unjust and violative of principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Articles 14, 21, 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to retrain from taking any further steps in pursuance of the 4(1) notification and set aside the same and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 8949 of 2003 ORAL ORDER When the matter is called there is no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner. Hence the writ petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs. __________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 7TH March 2008 PVSN/TSNR