1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 378 OF 2009 Sanjay Mishurimal Punamiya ...Petitioner Versus Ashok Pawar & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Ajay Basutkar i/by Ms. Bhagyashri Joshi for the Petitioner Mr. Niteen Pradhan, Senior Advocate, i/by Mr. P.Y. Shankar for Respondent No. 1. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: SEPTEMBER 17, 2009 P.C.:- The petitioner has grievance with respect to investigation in certain cases. Just before this petition was filed, in two cases, ‘B’ Summary was filed, and by our order dated 24th March, 2009, we had allowed the petitioner to approach the trial Court by way of protest petition. He submits that the protest 2 petition has been filed and re-investigation ordered. He also has the grievance against respondent No.1, who was the main Investigating Officer. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the other side submits that respondent No. 1 has already been transferred, and the Additional Public Prosecutor submits that they are ready to transfer the investigations to local Crime Branch, Thane Rural. 3. In these circumstances, the petition is disposed of, with a direction that the investigations of F.I.Rs. No. 67 of 2006, 74 of 2006 and 7 of 2008 be transferred from Police Station Bhayander to Crime Branch, Thane Rural. We are making it clear that we have not gone into the allegations levelled against respondent No. 1, since he has already been transferred, and, therefore, there is no occasion to go into such allegations, which the petitioner has also not pressed. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J.