IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22290 of 2009 PANKAJ YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 24.08.2009 Heard. The case is under section 395 IPC and the petitioner is in custody since 15.4.2009. There is no recovery of any incriminating article from him. Paragraphs 7, 8, 9 and 10 contain statements of witnesses who claim to have identified the petitioner and other accused persons like Kritya Nand Thakur in flash of torch light. Said Kritya Nand Thakur has been granted bail. Besides, the contention is that if at all the witnesses had identified the petitioner and other accused, the absence of their name in the FIR bears significance. Let petitioner Pankaj Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Araria in Araria P.S. Case no. 464 of 2006. Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)