B " ^ \l€ t.»»l.iAi1 Q te 1®». IN TEE HIGH COUET OF JUDICATUEE AT BILASPUR CHEATTISGARH W . P . N0 . •tl'3^ /2004 PETITIONEE EESPONDENTS .1°^ ^^ .* '. ..* Ranmat Singh, S/o.Chamru Sai Aged 34 years, R/o. Village Agarkhar, Post Jamnipali District Korba (C.G.) VEESUS :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary '^,v'^ Land Acquisition Department ...••"''cS?"" J ^•^^^ ^-'.A®"' js-"'-' ^' ^ A® k.-»; ^j.^;" -' ,.s D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. General Manager National Thermal Power Corporation Limited Vikas Bhawan, Pragati Nagar Korba, District Korba (C . G. ) 3. The Collector Korba, District Korba (C.G.) 4. Sub-Divisional Officer/ Land Acquisition Officer Jamnipali, Distt. Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDEE AETICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA L^r.-^ is3 B ssB8s B3a a \'-1'A ^ :lli COURT OF CHHATTISGAj WR1T PETlTION N0. 4136 OF 'etitionsr Ranmat Sinah Versus Respondents - State of Chhattlsgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTSCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDiA ?SB : Hon'bie Mr. Satjsh K. Asnjhotri, J.1 Present:- Shri Goutam Khetrapal, Advocates for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Pane! Lawyerforthe State/ respondents h.i-^ -3 1^<J. j, i.? & ^. Shri V'.R.Tiwari & Shri B.D.Guru, Advocates Tor the resoond< No.2. (Passed on 1 day ofOctober, 2010) 1. Learned counsel aDDearing for ihe Detitioner submits that the land in dispute was taken bv the resoondent No.2 under mutuai aareement. The comDensation was fixed to the tune of Rs. 1.14,399./- and the oetitioner was oaid only Rs. 4.757/-. He further submits that the oetitioner, !R iieu of the acauisition of iands under the policy of acquisltion, has a!so not been given an appointment. 2. !t appears that ths dispute stiil remains to be decidsd. Thus, havini reaard to the dlsputed facts in respect ofthe acqulsition of land, grant of employment and paymeni of compensation, there is no ciear records avaiiable in the fi!es. Thus, in the interests of justice, the Col'ector, Korba, is directed to look into the dlspute betw'een the Darties and after affording proDer opDortunitv of hearing to the State reDresentative. resDondent No.2/ National Therma! Power Corporation Ltd. and the petjtioner, pass an order, in sccordance with law, keeping in mind that a person, who claims to be titl.e holder / owner of the !and, cannot be deprived of iand without following due orocess of lav/. as the same is also protected under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India. 3. Needful mav be done at the eariiest. as the iand in dispute has acquired way bacR in the year, 1981. 4. Accordinaiv, the writ Detition is disposed of. No ordsr asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge