[[1]] IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. COMPANY PETITION No. 588 of 2005 S.S.ENGINEERS. .. ..PETITIONER VERSUS. DABHOL DABHOL DABHOL POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. .. ..RESPONDENTS. WITH COMPANY PETITION No. 589 of 2005 S.S.ENGINEERS. .. ..PETITIONER VERSUS. DABHOL DABHOL DABHOL POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. ..RESPONDENTS. WITH COMPANY PETITION No. 590 of 2005 S.S.ENGINEERS. .. ..PETITIONER VERSUS. DABHOL DABHOL DABHOL POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. .. ..RESPONDENTS. WITH COMPANY PETITION No. 591 of 2005 S.S.ENGINEERS. .. ..PETITIONER VERSUS. DABHOL DABHOL DABHOL POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. .. RESPONDENTS. WITH COMPANY PETITION No. 592 of 2005 [[2]] S.S.ENGINEERS. .. ..PETITIONER VERSUS. DABHOL DABHOL DABHOL POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. .. ..RESPONDENTS. WITH COMPANY PETITION No. 593 of 2005 S.S.ENGINEERS. .. ..PETITIONER VERSUS. DABHOL DABHOL DABHOL POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. ..RESPONDENTS. WITH COMPANY PETITION No. 594 of 2005 S.S.ENGINEERS. .. ..PETITIONER VERSUS. DABHOL DABHOL DABHOL POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. .. ..RESPONDENTS. WITH COMPANY PETITION No. 595 of 2005 S.S.ENGINEERS. .. ..PETITIONER VERSUS. DABHOL DABHOL DABHOL POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. .. ..RESPONDENTS. WITH COMPANY PETITION No. 596 of 2005 S.S.ENGINEERS. .. ..PETITIONER VERSUS. DABHOL DABHOL DABHOL POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. .. ..RESPONDENTS. WITH [[3]] COMPANY PETITION No. 597 of 2005 S.S.ENGINEERS. .. ..PETITIONER VERSUS. DABHOL DABHOL DABHOL POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. .. ..RESPONDENTS. WITH COMPANY PETITION No. 598 of 2005 S.S.ENGINEERS. .. ..PETITIONER VERSUS. DABHOL DABHOL DABHOL POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. .. ..RESPONDENTS. WITH COMPANY PETITION No. 599 of 2005 S.S.ENGINEERS. .. ..PETITIONER VERSUS. DABHOL DABHOL DABHOL POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. .. ..RESPONDENTS. WITH COMPANY PETITION No. 600 of 2005 S.S.ENGINEERS. .. ..PETITIONER VERSUS. DABHOL DABHOL DABHOL POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. .. ..RESPONDENTS. WITH COMPANY PETITION No. 601 of 2005 S.S.ENGINEERS. .. ..PETITIONER VERSUS. DABHOL DABHOL DABHOL POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. POWER CO.LTD. .. ..RESPONDENTS. [[4]] Mr. Halai i/b. Halai & Co.for Petitioners. Mr. N.H. Seerwai with Mr. Rahul Chitnis with C.S. Kapadia i/b. M. & M. Legal Ventures for the respondents Company. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATE DATE DATE : 27TH JULY, 2006. : 27TH JULY, 2006. : 27TH JULY, 2006. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1] Mr.Halai appearing for the petitioners, upon instructions, seeks leave to withdraw Company Petition Nos. 589 of 2005 and 599 of 2005. 2] Leave granted. C.P. Nos. 589/2005 and 599/2005 are dismissed for non prosecution. 3] No order as to costs. 4] As far as other petitions are concerned, Mr. Halai places on record further affidavits in which, acording to him, it is demonstrated that the contention of the Company that claims of Petitioners are time barred is unsound and devoid of substance. 5] Leave granted to place these [[5]] affidavits on record. Mr. Seerwai, learned Senior Counsel, appearing for the respondents submits that the Company does not admit the contents of these further affidavits. 6] Mr. Halai seeks leave to withdraw each of these petitions with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings for recovery of monies due and payable to the petitioners in each of these petitions. 7] Leave granted. Petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as above. All contentions of both sides on limitation as well as the merits are expressly kept open. 8] No order as to costs. [S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.] [S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.] [S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.]