IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41720 of 2009 SAINUL HAQUE Versus 1. The STATE OF BIHAR 2. Ruksana Begam ------ 6/ 06.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is every allegation regarding torture for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry but admittedly, she is residing to her parents’ house if not at her sweet will then there should be some response, while she was noticed with a view to have some talk she did not turn up and in reality complainant left matrimonial house voluntarily and deserted the husband. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 3817 of 2008 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Katihar subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)