IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.1347 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision: 05.08.2011 Ashupam Kaur …..Appellant versus Divisional Commissioner, Patiala and others ……Respondents CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon’ble Mr.Justice Augustine George Masih Present: Mr.Amarjit Markan, Advocate for the appellant Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) This appeal has been filed against an order dated 21.7.2011, dismissing CWP No.12722 of 2011, filed by the appellant. As per record, by filing that writ petition, the petitioner had laid challenge to the orders dated 15.12.2009, 19.7.2010 and 26.5.2011, vide which, mutation regarding the land, in dispute, was entered in the name of the private respondents. The learned Single Judge, after noting that the matter regarding title is pending adjudication before the Civil Court, declined to interfere at the instance of the appellant. It was also noted that as the mutation does not confer any title, it makes no difference whether it is in the name of the appellant –petitioner or the private respondents. Mutation is entered in the revenue record only to update the same. It was also noted by the learned Single Judge that civil suits are pending between the parties and any interim order regarding alienation of property can be passed by that Court on an application moved. We feel that the order passed is perfectly justified. No case is made out for interference. Dismissed. (Jasbir Singh) Judge 05.08.2011 (Augustine George Masih) gk Judge