IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 5TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 14TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 30780 of 2009(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- R.SANJAY, RAVEENDRA VILASAM, VENJARAMOODU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI. VENJARAMOOD M.ZIYAD RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VENJARAMOODU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. N.N.NIPU, S/O.NADARAJAN, N.N.NIVAS KARINJATHY KUZHY, VENJARAMOODU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS-R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ. --------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 30780 OF 2009 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. The petitioners approached this court with the following prayers:- A. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent not to harass the petitioner in not forwarding the documents and C.D set and other things of the vehicle to him. B. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to hand over the documents and C.D set with two speaker to the petitioner with respect to the vehicle bearing registration No.K.L 01 U.377. C. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to enquire the matter in view of Ext.P3 complaint of the petitioner. 2. Learned Government Pleader, on instruction, submits that the first respondent has nothing to do with the incident and the alleged incident has taken place under the jurisdiction of the Venjaramoodu Police Station. But, the petitioner has averred in the Writ Petition and also stated in Ext.P1 and P3 complaints that it is the first respondent who interfered in the matter. Having regard to the entire facts of the case, we are of the view that the second respondent has to look into the matter and take appropriate action in W.P.(C) NO.30780 of 2009 2 accordance with law. We dispose of this Writ Petition with a direction to the second respondent to look into the matter in Ext.P2 and take appropriate action, in accordance with law. This shall be done by the second respondent within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the Writ Petition from the petitioner. (KURIAN JOSEPH) JUDGE (C.T. RAVIKUMAR) JUDGE spc