IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.- M No. 35305 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 30, 2011 Nirmal Singh and another ... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. S.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.B.S. Teji, Sr. DAG, Punjab. * * * * RAJESH BINDAL, J. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR No.92, dated 25.07.2004, registered under Sections 326, 325, 324, 323, 148, 149 IPC, at Police Station Mamdot, District Ferozepur. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that though the petitioners were named in the FIR, however, they were found innocent during investigation. Challan was presented against Kulwant Singh, Surjit Singh, Ravinder Singh, Harpal Singh and Nasib Singh. Consequently, the petitioners were summoned to face trial in an application filed by the prosecution under Section 319 Cr.P.C. The injury, on the basis of which offence under Section 326 IPC, was invoked is on the leg of complainant- Harpreet Singh, which is attributed to Nasib Singh. He further submitted that the injuries attributed to the petitioners in the FIR were found to be simple. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI-Sucha Singh, submitted that considering the allegations against the petitioners, they do not deserve concession of bail. Criminal Misc.-M No. 35305 of 2011 (O&M) - 2 - After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the injuries attributed to the petitioners in the FIR were found to be simple in nature, in my opinion, the petitioners deserve concession of pre-arrest bail. They shall appear before the court below on the date already fixed i.e. 06.12.2011 and submit their bail bonds. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) November 30, 2011 JUDGE sarita