CWP No.359 of 2007. 20.3.2008. Present: Mr.Rajiv Jiwan, counsel for the petitioner. Mr.R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr.J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3, 6 & 7. Mr.S.R. Sharma, counsel for respondent No.4. Learned counsel for the petitioner restricted his prayer only to the extent that in times to come whenever the examiner is to be appointed, it should be strictly in the light of the guidelines issued by the Medical Council of India. Mr.S.R. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the University has no objection in case this request is allowed. Accordingly, whenever any examiner is appointed, it shall be in light of the guidelines issued by the Medical Council of India. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. In view of the disposal of the main petition, the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. March 20, 2008. (TILAK) (V.K. Ahuja), J.