IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.10813 of 2011 Date of Decision : June 03, 2011. Surekha Datta .....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a mandamus for the grant of proficiency step up on completion of 32 years of service under the ACP Scheme dated 25.9.1998 (Annexure P-1) and also to allow the petitioner to withdraw the option for the ACP Scheme dated 3.11.2006 (Annexure P-2). The afore-mentioned relief has been sought by the petitioner on the basis of the Division Bench decisions of this Court dated 24.9.2011 rendered in CWP No.16364 of 1999 (Mangat Ram Nain and others versus State of Haryana and others) (Annexure P-4) and dated 8.10.2002 rendered in CWP No.7049 of 2000 (Randhir Kaur and others versus State of Haryana and others) (Annexure P-5). In this regard, the petitioner is said CWP No.10813 of 2011 [2] to have served the respondents with a legal notice dated 21.4.2011 (Annexure P-6) but without any response thereto so far. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the claim of the petitioner as also contained in the legal notice dated 21.4.2011, by passing a speaking order in the light of the afore-mentioned decisions in Mangat Ram Nain's case (supra) and Randhir Kaur's case (supra), within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. June 03 , 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE