IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 486 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 486 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 486 OF 2006 M/s. Trig Detectives Pvt. Ltd. ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ] .. Respondents Mr. Rajiv Morey with Mr. S.R. Mishra and V.V. Mishra for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Mokashi, AGP, for the respondent No.1. Mrs. Lata Desai with Ms. Pallavi Divekar for the respondent No.2. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 22ND MARCH, 2006 P.C. : . The grievance of the petitioner is that though on behalf of the State Government, a statement was made which was recorded by the order of this Court dated 22nd December, 2005 in Writ Petition No.2607 of 2005 that they would hear the petitioner and inspite of the petitioner having furnished the documents, till date there has been no decision. : 2 : 2. On behalf of the respondent-State, learned AGP points out that the Statutory Body which was to decide the matter could not function in view of the interim order passed by this Court. That order has since been vacated and the Board is now in a position to exercise its jurisdiction. Learned AGP, therefore, seeks four weeks’ time to dispose of the pending application of the petitioner. Statement accepted. 3. The State Government is directed to dispose of the pending application of the petitioner within six weeks from today. 4. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. Sd/- [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]