IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45419 of 2010 Abbas Darzee Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 4/ 27.07.2011 It appears that the order dated 15.07.2011 was pronounced, but due to computer fault/technical fault the pronounced order is incomplete in its contents, as a result of which the order could not be transmitted through Fax. Accorodingly, let the order dated 15.07.2011 be read as follows as really was pronounced:- “Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is named in the F.I.R. by the informant stating that one Ram Sugarath Baitha told him about making statement by the deceased before him about killing by this petitioner also alsong with others. Submission of the learned counel for the petitioner is that Ram Sugarath Baitha is examined in the case but is not naming this petitioner as assailant of the deceased and there is no eye witness in the case at all regarding involvement of this petitioner. Only on suspicion, he is apprehending his arrest which cannot be justified. Taking the same into consideration, prayer of the petitioner for bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Parihar P.S. Case No. 21 of 2010 above named petitioner shall 2 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Sitamarhi subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C.” Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)