IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2011 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 8641 of 2011(E) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SUSAN NATHAN, AGED 62 YEARS, D/O.DR. SAMUEL LEVY, RESIDING OF APARTMENT NO.5A1, CRESECENT ORCHID, P.T. USHA ROAD, CALICUT - 673 032, IN KATCHERI VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.MANJERI SUNDERRAJ SRI.M.PROMODH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME MINISTRY, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (SSB), SPECIAL BRANCH POLICE, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE - 673 020. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (SSB), SPECIAL BRANCH POLICE, CPO COMPOUND, KOZHIKODE - 673 001. 4. THE REGISTRATION OFFICER, UNDER THE FOREIGNERS REGISTRATION ACT AND RULES, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE - 673 020. 5. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, HOME MINISTRY (FOREIGNER'S DIVISION) NEW DELHI. ADV. SRI.T.SANJAY, CGC FOR R5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ------------------------- W.P (C) No.8641 of 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 24th March, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, a' foreign national', who came to India, is presently residing within the jurisdiction of the 4th respondent, at Calcut in Kerala. 2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner wants to continue for some more time in India; particularly in Kerala in connection with the some personal likes and reasons and also for some treatment which is stated as being undergone. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the passport bearing 13531724 of the petitioner issued at 'Akko' by the 'State of Israel' is valid upto 21.4.2019.. The VISA issued by the Indian Embassy expired on 16.9.2010, which, however, has been sought to be renewed by filing Ext.P8 application before the 5th respondent. Further in conformity with the relevant statutory prescription, the petitioner has also filed Ext.P4 application before the concerned authority, i.e the 4th respondent for resident permit and to continue in station. The grievance of the petitioner is that without any regard to the pendency of the W.P (C) No. 8641 of 2011 2 above proceedings, a 'Quit Notice' has been issued to the petitioner, which made her to seek for intervention of this Court. 4. Heard the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 3 and the learned Central Government Counsel appearing for the respondents 4 and 5. 5. After hearing both the sides, the 4th respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P4, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 'one month' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Similarly the 5th respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P8, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 'two months' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It will be for the petitioner to produce a copy of this judgment before the concerned respondents forthwith. Implementation of the "Quit Notice' shall be subject to the orders to be passed as aforesaid. Writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE ma /True copy/ P.A to Judge