IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.289 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5991 OF 2005 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr.P.K.Rele with Mr.A.K.Jalisatgi for the appellant. Mr.V.M.Parkar for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI & CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI & CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 12TH JANUARY, 2006 DATED: 12TH JANUARY, 2006 DATED: 12TH JANUARY, 2006. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The Labour Court held that the enquiry is vitiated interalia because six witnesses were examined on the same day. The learned single Judge has upheld this finding. We find no reason to interfere with the impugned order for the simple reason that the order of Labour Court which is confirmed states that the appellant can prove misconduct before the Court to substantiate proposed punishment of dismissal. There is, therefore, no failure of justice. The impugned order of the learned single Judge is well reasoned and hence the letters patent appeal is dismissed. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (Smt.Ranjana Desai,J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (Smt.Ranjana Desai,J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (Smt.Ranjana Desai,J.)