IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22230 of 2010 RAJEEV RAI @ RAJEEV KR.RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 452,376/511, 341,323,506/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged against Pappu Rai that he attempted to commit the offence under Sections 376/511 of the I.P.C. It is alleged against this petitioner and others that when Pappu Rai was caught by the informant’s side, they allowed Pappu Rai to run away from the place of occurrence. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and similarly situated accused Ram Prakash Rai has been granted anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 50769 of 2008. Considering the fact that the main accused Pappu Rai and other accused person have been granted bail, let the petitioner, above named, be released on 2 bail on his surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 81 of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Begusarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438( 2) of Cr.P.C. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)