THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3963 OF 2010 DATED: 17-03-2011. Between 1.D.Ramanatham and others … Petitioners-D3 to D5 And 1.Singi Reddy Laxma Reddy and others …Respondents-Plaintiff and Defendants 2,6 and 8 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3963 OF 2010 ORDER: This revision is directed aggrieved by the order, dated 31-05-2010, in I.A.No.355 of 2009 in ASSR No.243 of 2009, on the file of the Principal District Judge, R.R. District at L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad, whereunder and whereby the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to condone the delay of 26 days in filing the appeal against the judgment and decree, dated 11-11-2008, passed in O.S.No.165 of 2001 on the file of the VI Addl. Senior Civil Judge, (FTC), Ranga Reddy District, was dismissed. 2. The reason given by the petitioners is that as they went to Pilgrimage Sabarimalai, they could not file the appeal in time and therefore, they filed the application for condonation of delay. 3. The word ‘sufficient cause’ has not been defined under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, but it must mean, the cause which is beyond the control of the party invoking the aid of the Section. Any reasonable cause which prevented a person from approaching the Court is said to be sufficient case. In view of the fact that the petitioner and others went to Sabarimalai, they could not file the appeal. As sufficient cause is shown, the delay has to be condoned. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and consequently I.A. 355 of 2009 filed by the petitioners to condone the delay of 26 days in filing the appeal is allowed. No order as to costs. --------------------- K.C.BHANU, J DATED: 17-03-2011 Hsd