IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 17690 of 2007 Between: M/s.Surya Real Estate, Gurramguda village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, rep.by its Managing PArtner, Sri G.Narsimha Reddy S/o.Late Gopal Reddy, aged 48 years, Occ:Business ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad 2 The Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, rep.by its Vice Chairman, Police Line, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad 3 The Special Deputy Collector,LA-II, Outer Ring Road HUDA complex,Tarnaka, Hyderabad 4 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District Lakdikapool,Hyderabad 5 The Mandal Revenue officer, Hayathnagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 5 herein in acquiring the petitioner land bearing Sy.Nos.53,54,55, & 56 plotted area of 2800 sq.yards and 1967 sq.yards in Sy.No.642 and 5983 sq.yards out Sy.No.643 and 26,693 sq.yards in Sy.No.640 belonging to the petitioners herein situated at Turkayamjal village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District for the public purpose of development of Township and future projects in pursuance of 4(1) notification published in AP Gazettee No.45 dated 28.6.20045 and also 6 declaration in RR.No.121 & 124 published on 23.7.2005 in the Gazettee as arbitrary, illegal, and without jurisdiction and quash the same. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.VASUDEVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 17690 of 2007 O R D E R: Sri N. Vasudeva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Y. Ravindra, learned standing counsel for HUDA would agree that the subject matter of this writ petition is covered by the order of this Court in W.P.Nos. 13863, 14247 and 14478 of 2005 dated 23.7.2008. This writ petition shall also be allowed in terms of the aforesaid order and the impugned notification is quashed to the extent of the petitioner. It is, however, made clear that this order shall not preclude the respondents from initiating acquisition proceedings afresh in accordance with law. No costs. C.V. RAMULU, J. Date: 04-02-2009. MVB.