IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Cr.Misc. NO. M 3758 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION 26.3.2009 Deepak Kumar ......PETITIONER VERSUS State of Punjab ......RESPONDENTS PRESENT: Mr. BS guliani, Advocate Ms. RK Nihalsinghwala, Sr.DAG, Punjab Mr. SS Majithia, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner seeks the concession of regular bail in a case registered at the instance of Navin Kumar that his father Darshan Lal has been waylaid and attacked by Surinder Bahl and two others. Surinder Bahl is stated to be phufar of the complainant. Learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed the petition for bail contending that the petitioner is involved in a number of cases and that he indulges in hired killings also. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. So far as the part attributed to the petitioner in this case is concerned, he is alleged to have given a khanjer blow on the left thigh of Darshan Lal. It is also not out of place to observe here that the petitioner was not named in the FIR but was named by the injured subsequently when his statement was recorded. It will be a moot point during trial whether the petitioner had conspired with other accused, who have been attributed grievous injury on the person of Darshan Lal. In view of the fact that the petitioner has been attributed individually a simple injury, he can be granted the concession of bail in view of the fact that he has been in custody since 17.12.2008. The petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court subject to the condition that he will not commit the similar offence of which he is accused of during pendency of the trial. March 26 ,2009 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE