(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 21 OF 2011 Ramrao s/o. Bhimrao Gharule. .. Petitioner. versus Bhagwat s/o. Bhimrao Gharule & 2 others. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. R.K. Ashtekar, Advocate, for the petitioner. ........................ CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 11TH JANUARY 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. The trial court has found that story of the petitioner / plaintiff, about getting knowledge of sale deed from mutation entry, incorrect. It has found that the sale deed was already in his possession. This finding is not shown to be either erroneous or (2) perverse. 2. I am, therefore, not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. 3. With liberty to challenge the impugned order, after the suit is finally decided, if occasion therefor arises, the petition is disposed of. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp21