INTHEHON'BLEHIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Criminal. Misc. Petition No. ^M 1 / 2011 PETITIONERS .».«..........^^t) P.^M^;.^(a ^..y.TA/-"" -—~=Si.,>.• ./^ws€' !'/ ^ " ~~'-'l ^ / ^ s i!*l^-^,\ 'l', ' ' f3aTOS''(s-"-! ^^ 'Y'^? 1. Ramesh Marko, S/o P. R. Marko, Aged 30 years, Occupation-Service, Allahabad Bank, R/0- Quarter No. 2/D, Street- 36, sectof-1, Bhilai Nagar, P.8.- Bhatti, Tehsil 85 Dist-Durg (C.G.) 2. Mohd. Afzal, S/o Allauddin, Aged-30 Years, Occupation- Service, Quarter No-l/B, Street-16, Sector- 1, Bhilai Nagar, P.8.- Bhatti, Tehsil 8s Dist-Durg (C.G.) 3. Raviraj James, S/o H. James, Aged-33 Years, Occupation- Service, Solution Specialist, Nokia, R/0- Block No- 04, Street No- 7, Dixit Colony, Kosa Nagar, P.S.- Supela, Tehsil & Dist- Durg(C.G) 4. Sushil Parate, S/o V. S. Parate, Aged 39 years, Occupation- Business, R/o- MIG-1-8, Hudco, P.S.- Kotwali, Tehsil 85 Dist-Durg (C.G) 5. Mahesh Alias Milind Raut, S/o- V. D. Raut, Aged 28 years, <^3 RESPONDENT Occupation- Service, R/o- Kurud Road, Kohka, P.S.- Supela, Tehsil & Dist- Durg (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Station House Officer, Supela, Distt. Durg (C.G.). PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF ^RIMLNAL PROCEDURB CODE FOR QUASHIN6 THE FIR DATED 10-08-2008; AGAINST THE PETITIONERS^_UNDEEl SECTION'S 420, 506, 34 OF IPC. ?:%T T 'a^. '"b.. Icra, -^'tTtaTI^, ^diyi< .^y.'v^..:.'^....-.^^!1 ^200 sn^r w R-fi^i ^IT ^fl^i?! 5T>*li<ft ,£-' yeepii an^l •wv C^rfy^) 'r' TRIIW ^tftg 311^!I SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra ivioijian Shrivastava, J. 01-09-2011 ^iT'lferqh •WS 'cf fyS 1'?3RgTC ^affiman^r snn Jaiaeep Yaaav, coun; Ms. Sunita Jain, Panei Lav From the t-iK wnicn nas D' that the same is not readabie. fel for the petitioners. tyerfortneState. $en piaced on record as Annexure /vi,rt is rouna The petition is permittea along witn legiDie copy OT !-IK. etitioners submits ihat the petitioners have been ded in the Police Station. Me suomits tnat tne therefore, it is not Dossibie to even put the typed Learned counsel ror me .det suppiied a copy of FIR as reco( aocument is not legiDie at aii anq copy oftne document. ATter going through the d<tcument, it is touna tnat me wrrting on tne I-IK is quite iliegibie. The petitioners m^y approach the concerned Station House Officer with an appiication to suppiy a re^dable copy of the FiR. If such application is mai(ie, legible copy or t-iK snaii De suppliea to me petitioners within a period of 15 c|ays. :o be withdrawn with iibertv to file fresh petinon Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ) -»1 -.J.