(763w? IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUEIGATURE 9F CHHATTISGARH: AT BILASPUR 2mm mmmxom No. #953 {2003 E ’J'II‘ m hiIGNER3 : 1);Parasram Singh 6houhan, S/o Shri Mangal Simgh Chouhan, Aged abovi 47 years, Head Constable (Telecom) 2).Rajendra 'Prasad Sharma, S/o Shriram Shawna, Aged about 47 years, Head ConsLuable { Telecom) 3).Poomm Ghana Paiiel, S/o Sbri Deoram Patel, Aged abou'h 41 years, Consiable ( Teleecm ) All ihe above pe’rdtioners are presen'bly pos‘md in we Office of the Superimendent 9f E9olice, Telecom (Radie),BiLaspur (C.G). ~VERSUS- w.~wmwm RESPONDEM : 1). Unian o£ india, Through S ' The Secreisary, Department of Pei~sonnel/E’ublic Grievances and‘ pension, Thira Floor, Lak Myalc Bhawan, Khan Market New Delhi. The Advisory Committee {Presided over by Shri Lohani Cons‘aituted under $ecti on 71 of ‘§he MJB. fie—organisation Ac‘a,2000 Deparmenf, of General Administration Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal ( M.P. ). State of mohya Fradesh Through: The Secrefaary, Depar’ameno of Home Affairs, Vallabh Bhawm, Bhopal ( M.P.). .. . . / Skate 0f Chha'btisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Depar’nment of Home Affairs, Mantralaya, D. K. s. Bui lding, Raipur ( C.C1.). WRIT EETITIDN UNDER ARTICLES 22'6//é27 F THE CONSTITUTIGN 4). OF IE‘EIA. 2x (b ' HIGH COURT OF CHHATI‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR $ingle Bench: Hon’bhe Mr. Justice satish K. Agnihotri. Writ Petition No. 2653 of 2003 Petitioners Parasram Singh Chouhan &. two others Versus Respondaits Union of India 35 others Shri Rajendra Tripafhi, Advocats for th€ peiifionars. Shri S. K. Beriwal, Standmg counsel for Respondent No. 1, Shn' Sachin Singh Rajput for Respondent No, 2 85 3. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel lawyer for the respondent No. 4. ORAL ORDER ( 8th February, 2006) The following order of the Court was passed by Satish .K. Agnihotri, J. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are working in the ottice of the Superintendent of Police, Telecom (Radio), Bilaspur. The petitioners had submitted their option for sewing in the State of Madhya Pradesh. The petitioners have been allocated to the State of Chhattisgarh and they want their reallocation to the State of Madhya Pradesh. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instruction, submits that the petitioners be granted liberty to make a representation to the respondents for redressal of their grievances. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection to the said submission. OK In View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of finally, with liberty to the petitioners to make an appropriate representation to the respondentsfauthorities concerned, within a period of two weeks from today, and the respondents/ authorities are directed to consider and decide the same, in an objective manner; in accordance with law, Within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the lepresentation, if any. Certified copy, as per Rules. / Sdl— i \ Satish K- Wm“ Judge Thakur