'* C -P.f»<(^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0^ /2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^^>^, ^ '.^•••ry/••••' ^'* c^>^ -<'/ ...>••".^^ ..•••ff ,^>""^3' ...<\l h^-'' A®B' .••ft^ •< , H.R.Jain, S/o.Late Kejaram Jain, Aged about 46 years; Occupation Service, Assistant Grade-II, R/o. Block 8s Tahsil Konta, District South Bastar, Dantewada (C.G.) VERSUS /1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Tribal Welfare SE Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). ' 2. The Collector, District South Bastar, Dantewada (C.G.) The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development Department, South Bastar, Dantewada (C.G.) 4. The Block Education Officer, Konta, Tahsil Konta, District South Bastar, Dantewada (C.G.j. HIGH COTJRT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BIT ASPI JR WRTT PETmON (S) No. 57QQ of2011 PETmONER : H.R.Jain. BESPONDENTS VRRSTJS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. ^6 Amit W'KTT PETinONW33ERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTEON OF INDIA SB: Hon'We Shri Satish K. Aanihotri, J. Present: Shri Ashok Shukia, Advocate fbr the petitioner. Sla-i Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer for tfae State/respoudents. OJRnF^R (Passed on 23Ili day of September, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, working as Assistant Grade II, at the office of Block Education Officer, Konta, has been transfetred to Hieher Secondary School, Tongpal, Block Chhindgarh, vide order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexiire P/l), on admimstrative grounds. Shri Shukla fitrther submits that the wife ofthe petitioner is also a goverament swvant and posted a.s Shiksha Kanni Grade IL in Govemment High School, Errabor, Block Konta. Thus, in view oftjie policy ofthe StMe which prescribes that as far as possible, the husband and wife must be posted at the same place, the petitioner ought to have been posted at the nearest place ofposting ofthe husband. 2. Learaed coun.sd appearing for the State submits that iffhe petitioner alongwith her husband makes a joint representation raismg their grievances, ttie same shall be coasidered and dedded in accordance with law on its owa merits, as e}q?editiously as possible. 3. In view oftfae above, according to Seamed couasel appearmg for the petitioner, nothine siirvives inthis petition for adjudication. 1 ' 4. 'Accordmdy, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation, . .^ • ; •,^^y,,,{Sd/- . SatisliiK. Sgnihotri 1 Judge 'l^ i.siBA'^^il^