$ei§€§oner @) Raspondems Ram Narayan Ram, S/o. Shriram, aged about 43 years; Occupation Upper Division Teacher, Government Higher Secondary Schoo}, Dundera, Bhiiai Nagag Durg, Tahsé! and Dist. Durg, CG. Versus 1) The State of Chhattisgarh} Through the Secretary Department of School Educa’tionx Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Building, Raipur, CG. 2) The Director, ?’ublio Instructions, Chhatt‘rsgarh, Raipur, Tahsi! and District Raipur’ CG 3) The District Education Officer) Durg, Tahsii and District Durg, CG (Writ Petition under Articies 22$l227 of the Constitution of indie) Present: Shri SK. Thomas, counsei for the petitionet. Shri Sushii Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORFxL ORDER (Paseed on 25th Aprii, 206?} Learned counsei appearing for the petiiioner as weii as for the Statelresponcients jointly submit that the fact and question of iaw invoived in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipai Corporation, Burg and another { 2GO6 (it) MPJR vCG 96}, which has been disposeoi. of Vide order dated 3-4-2G06. Learned counsei appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. HIGH COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH: BELASPUR Writ Petition No. 3&9 of 2G93 SB: Hon’iaie Shri Justice 3atish K. Agnihotri Accordingiy, the wrii petition is ailow‘ed in terms of the order nicipai Corporation, Durg and another (supra), subject to vefificaiien of the fact as to whether acquired B.Ed. Examination Ceriifica£e on as per ihe circuiars dated 24-12- further‘whether he has been paid two advance increments or r the ’pefa’tioner has his own expenses 1§98 arid 1-3-1999 and noi. No order as to costs. Raju