IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15538 of 2009 1. LALO YADAV 2. RAJ BABU YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 20.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioners, who are accused for offences punishable under sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 is the father-in-law of the deceased, whereas petitioner no.2 is her husband and both are poor labourers. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that petitioner no.2 has his own earnings and has left his father and was living separately with his wife. Learned counsel for the petitioners also avers that no specific overt act has been alleged against the petitioners, who are in custody since October, 2008. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, the prayer for bail of petitioner no.2, namely Raj Babu Yadav is rejected. However, the prayer for bail of petitioner no.1, namely Lalo Yadav is allowed. Let petitioner no.1, namely Lalo Yadav shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Simari P.S. Case No.62 of 2008. harish/ ( S.N.Hussain, J)