IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21143 of 2009 1. MD.ISLAM 2. Md. Kalam 3. Zakir Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 27.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition. All the accused persons including the petitioners have been alleged for causing assault but according to the learned counsel for the petitioners, it is Dinesh Thakur, who has only been alleged for the offence under Section 307 of I.P.C. as well as ¾ of the Explosive Substance Act as he has been alleged for hurling bomb which hit the informant’s leg. In this case, false implication is apparent, as petitioner nos. 1 and 2 earlier filed a complaint case against the informant Md. Mobeen and all the petitioners are apprehending their arrest, which can never be justified. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 286 of 2004, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)