: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.435 OF 2009 T.U. Kaimal ....Petitioner V/s. Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.G. Krishna Mohan Nair for the Petitioner. Mr.Satish Kamat for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2009. P.C. : 1. Rule. By consent the rule is made returnable forthwith and heard finally. 2. The Petitioner has challenged an order under Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003. 3. It appears that certain contentions of the Petitioner remained to be considered such as even assuming that the finding is against the Petitioner whether the electricity consumption in respect of the entire premises ought to be assessed as such. In fact by a letter dated 24.1.2009, the Petitioner has been invited "to discuss the matter". This letter was after the impugned order. : 2 : 4. In the circumstances, the impugned order is set-aside and the authority shall decide the Petitioner’s objection afresh. Needless to say that all the contentions of the parties are kept open. 5. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.