( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.44 OF 2009 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.44 OF 2009 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.44 OF 2009 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.626 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.626 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.626 OF 2008 Shri.Madhusudan T.Pandey .. Appellant V/s The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mmumbai & Others .. Respondents Mr.A.R.Shaikh i/by Mr.R.M.Pethe for the Appellant. Mr.M.M.Malandkar i/by Mr.A.J.Bhor for the Respondents. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : J.N.PATEL & J.N.PATEL & J.N.PATEL & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. R.G.KETKAR, JJ. R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 2nd April, 2009. DATE : 2nd April, 2009. DATE : 2nd April, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. Appellant is the original complainant before the Industrial Court, which allowed his complaint. Being aggrieved by the decision, the Respondent - Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai challenged the order before the learned Single Judge by filing the Writ Petition. In the Writ Petition, the learned Single Judge granted interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c) resulting in stay of the effect and operation of the order passed by the Industrial Court. 2. We do not find that the interim order in any way causes prejudice to the Appellant. The learned Single Judge has also expedited the hearing having observed "Rule Expedited". We therefore do not think that this is a fit case to interfere in our appellate jurisdiction. Letters Patent Appeal is therefore ( 2 ) dismissed. 3. Liberty to the Appellant to move the learned Single Judge for fixing the date of hearing of the Petition. 4. In view of disposal of the Letters Patent Appeal, nothing survives in the Civil Application. Civil Application stands dismissed. (J.N.PATEL, J.) (J.N.PATEL, J.) (J.N.PATEL, J.) (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (R.G.KETKAR, J.)