1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR MCA (Review) NO. 277 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4989 OF 2008 (Shri Santosh Kumar s/o Bhanudas Dhaye vs. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. MARCH 17, 2010. Heard applicant/ petitioner in person and Shri Kankale, learned AGP for respondents No. 1, 2 & 5. The petitioner submits that in view of the earlier judgment delivered in his favour in Writ Petition No. 1833 of 1994, the petitioner ought to have been reinstated as this Court has found that there was no question of any time limit for him to obtain B.Ed. qualification. It is his next contention that the matters clubbed with his writ petition while delivering judgment on 19.01.2010 are totally different and his contentions in Writ Petition No. 4989 of 2008 deserved to be considered independently and uninfluenced by those matters. The perusal of judgment delivered by this Court on 19.01.2010 shows that the questions involved in all three writ petitions were identical. Merely because this Court has found that there is no time limit prescribed in the matter, the present applicant does not become entitled to grant of relief of reinstatement. This 2 Court has interpreted provisions of Rule 6 of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules. There is no case made out warranting any review in the matter. Review application is dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.