1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.266 OF 2006 IN AWARD DATED22/12/2004 Punjab Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd. .. Plaintiffs Versus M/s.Mistry Prabhudas Manji Engg.Pvt.Ltd. .. Defendants Mr.Sanjeev Hariakar for plaintiffs/claimants Mr.Kharawala i/b. R.K.Associates for defendants CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 14th January 2009. P.C. . It is stated that the decree holder and the judgement debtor have arrived at a settlement out of court which is evidenced by a deed of settlement made at Chandigarh on 28th November 2008. Decree holder’s Advocate has, therefore, received instructions from decree holder to withdraw the execution application. It is also stated by the decree holder that the decree be 2 marked satisfied as the parties have arrived at a settlement out of court. 2. In the light of the fact that the decree holder’s Advocate has received written instructions from the decree holder and a copy of the settlement deed is also placed on record, which is confirmed by the judgement debtor, the execution application is disposed of. Decree is marked satisfied in terms of settlement deed, a copy of which is taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. 3. Needless to state that once the decree is marked satisfied and the execution application itself is disposed of, the attachment on moveables and immovable properties of the judgement debtor stands raised forthwith. In the light of the disposal of execution application, Chamber Summons No.908 of 2007 does not survive and is disposed of accordingly. 3 (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)