IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 589 of 2010 With CLMA No. 5881 of 2010 1. Nirmal Joddar S/O Shri Sishubar Joddar 2. Devbrot Joddar S/O Shri Nirmal Joddar 3. Smt. Tripti Dhali W/O Shri Prakash Dhali D/O Shri Nirmal Joddar 4. Smt. Deepti Mandal W/O Shri Sudarshan Mandal, D/O Shri Nirmal Joddar 5. Chandu @ Chandana W/O Devbrot Joddar 6. Nitai S/O Smt Deepti Mandal All R/O Sourabh Nagar, Ward No. 2 Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar ………………. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand, through Superintendent of Police, Udham Singh Nagar 2. Station House Officer, Police Station Kotwali Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar 3. Sapan Ray, S/O Shri Ravi Ray R/O Sourabh Nagar, Ward No.2 Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. ………..Respondents. Shri M.K.Ray, Advocate present for the petitioners. Shri M.A.Khan, Brief Holder, present for the state Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. 2 (2) By means of this writ petition moved under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought quashing of the First Information Report dated 07.07.2010, relating to offences punishable under section 147, 148, 452, 323, 324, 504, 506, 427 I.P.C., which is registered as crime/F.I.R. No. 352 of 2010 at Police Station Rudrapur. (3) Learned counsel for the petitioners drew attention of this court to Annexure-5 to the writ petition and submitted that it was the petitioner no.1 who made a complaint against complainant Sapan Ray and others, to the Incharge P.S Rudrapur. Having gone through the First Information Report challenged before this court, and after completion the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the impugned F.I.R is supported by some medical evidence. In the circumstances, this court is not to inclined to interfere with the investigation of this case. (4) Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that if the petitioners namely Nirmal Joddar, Devbrot Joddar, Smt Tripti Dhali, Smt Depti Mandal, Chandu and Nitai surrender before the court concerned, or arrested, their bail application shall be heard and disposed of 3 without unreasonable delay. (Stay Application No. 5881 of 2010 also stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt.22.07.2010 NP