1 cra645 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.645 OF 2011 Usha Surreshchandra Bhatta & Ors. ...Applicants vs. Bipin Premchandra Parekh ...Respondent Mr.P.M.Shah and D.S.Jain for the applicants None for the respondents CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 23, 2011 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the revision applicant. By the impugned order, application made by the applicants-original plaintiffs for appointment of Court Commissioner for local investigation has been rejected. 2 Obviously, the revision application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 is not maintainable against the impugned order. Even if the revision application is converted into a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the same will come up before this Court. Hence, I have heard the learned counsel for the applicants on merits. 3 The impugned order is purely interlocutory in nature. Moreover, at any stage of the proceedings, if the Trial Court is of the view that the appointment of the Court Commissioner is necessary, 2 cra645 the Trial Court can exercise power under Order XXVI of the said Code notwithstanding the impugned order. 4 Subject to what is observed above, the Revision Application is rejected. JUDGE