IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.17045 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 13, 2011 Sneh Lata .....PETITIONER Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panchkula and another ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M. JEYAPAUL --- Present: Mr. I.D. Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. .. SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner, who claims herself to be the oustee, has filed this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for issuing direction to the respondents to allot her a plot being an oustee under the Haryana Urban Development Authority's Policies dated 18.3.1992 and 12.3.1993. Admittedly before approaching this Court, the petitioner did not make any representation to the authorities concerned. In view of the admitted position, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to first approach the authorities, and thereafter, if the representation submitted by the petitioner is not considered by the authorities, then she may approach this Court, in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE September 13, 2011 ( M. JEYAPAUL ) vkg JUDGE