1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7055 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.7055 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.7055 OF 2004 Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Sena ..Petitioner Vs. Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay & Thane District & Ors. ..Respondents ----- Ms. Ranjana Thodankar i/b. S.S. Pakale for Petitioner Mr.M.V. Jaykar i/b. M/s. M>V>Jaykar & Co. for Respondent no.3 Mr. M.S. Topkar for Respondent no.1 CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. DATE: 3RD FEBRUARY, 2005. DATE: 3RD FEBRUARY, 2005. DATE: 3RD FEBRUARY, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. Considering earlier orders of this Court the petition is disposed of by following order:- (i). The Respondent no.2 will apply to the Board for registration within a period of two weeks from today. The Board to consider the said application and pass appropriate orders within four weeks thereafter. (ii). Similarly the employees at Exhibit-A represented by petitioners to apply for registration with the Board within two weeks 2 from today, on such application the Respondent no.1 to pass appropriate orders within four weeks thereafter. In the mean time the services of security guards at Exhibit-A not to be terminated. (iii). If the Respondent no.2 does not apply for registration it is open to the Respondent no.1 to take appropriate action in law which is available, however the Respondent no.1 on registration to allocate the security guards as far as possible with Respondent no.2. . Rule made absolute accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. . Petitioners to serve copy of this order on Respondent no.2. (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.)