1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW PETITION NO.155/2011 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.398/2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8536/2009 (Nivruti s/o Shankar Bhaware Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders Mr.NR Solunke, Adv. for review Petitioner; Mr.VH Dighe, AGP for State; Mr.RT Nagargoje, Adv. for Resp.No.4. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 8 th NOVEMBER,2011. 1. Heard. 2. Review of saddling the costs of Rs. 5,000/- is sought. 3. Learned Counsel submits, though when the order of cost was saddled, he was absent. He was busy before the court during the course of the day and has also indeed, within two days thereafter, filed affidavit in reply, challenging the contempt petition. 4. Mr.Nagargoje, learned Counsel for the petitioner, leaves the matter to the Court. 5. Considering the difficulties explained, the Review petition is allowed. The order saddling the costs of Rs.5,000/- 2 against the respondent No.4, is re- called. Review Petition allowed accordingly. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/