THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOs.1238 & 1241 OF 2011 DT.15.04.2011 Between: S.A.poonawala ………..Petitioner Vs. Karan Center Flat Owner’s Association, Secunderabad and two others. ……………Respondents (Parties in both the revision petitions are one and the same) O R D E R: C.R.P.No.1238 of 2011 is filed assailing the order dated 03.03.2011 passed in I.A.No.1019 of 2010 in I.A.No.831 of 2010 in O.S.No.643 of 2010 and C.R.P.No.1241 of 2011 is filed assailing the order dated 03.03.2011 passed in I.A.No.1020 of 2010 in I.A.No.831 of 2010 in O.S.No.843 of 2010 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, wherein and whereby the applications filed by the first petitioner/respondent under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 C.P.C., seeking to implead the petitioner association as proper and necessary party in the above said suits as defendant No.2 for proper adjudication of the matter was allowed. The court below allowed the said applications holding that the impleadment of P.Atchuta Rao who is acting as Vice President wants to act as a representative of the Association for the welfare of the families in Karan Apartment and thereby found that it is necessary to implead the said person as a party to the suit. In view of the findings given by the court below, I do not find any reason to interfere with the discretion exercised by the court below. The revision petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J Dt.15.04.2011 tjs.