IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.782 of 2011 AMITESH KUMAR . Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS . ----------- 3 20-06-2011 Heard the parties in respect of I.A. no. 3730 of 2011 preferred under Rule 5 of Chapter VI of Patna High Court Rules seeking leave to maintain this Letters Patent Appeal on the ground that appellant is adversely affected by the judgement and order under appeal dated 28-01-2010 whereby CWJC no. 13196/2009 (Raj Kumar Jha Vs the Union of India & Ors) was allowed. According to learned counsel for the appellant the writ petitioner got the order in his favour on the basis of wrong facts to the effect that final decision on the basis of interview had not been taken by the authorities. According to stand on behalf of the appellant the interview was concluded by the authorities and on the same date, that is, 8-10-2009 the result of the interview was also declared in which the appellant was successful as no. 1 candidate. In our view, in the facts of the case the appropriate course of action for the appellant would be to 2 move the writ court in review jurisdiction. In that view of the matter, this interlocutory application and the appeal are disposed of finally with the liberty that, if so advised, the appellant may seek review of the judgement and order under appeal on the grounds permissible under law. BKS/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Vijayendra Nath, J.)