"? ft IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ( S ) No. ^c^ Of 2010 PETITIONER: , ^ )^/^u \'>-?y^". ^.^y../ \J>:' '<.--'^'''"- 6<'B ^''^r^\a -.••"'-JJ--?\\p' .^^<hy ^-;,^ ^- ^' >s^ RESPONDENTS: Devlal Singh Raj S/o Pardeshi Singh Raj, aged about 42 years, occupation Ex. Terminated Forest Guard, Forest Range Sanna, Division Jashpur, R/o Bamhani Kala, Post Podi, P.S. Sipat Via Jairam Nagar , District BUaspur (CG). Versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Forest Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipiir (CG). 2. "The Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Jashpur (Gen), Jashpur (CG). 3. The Sub Divisional Forest OffiGer cum Inquiry Officer, Jashpur, (CG). 41 The Range Officer, Forest Range Sanna, District Jashpur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 3^r "Mi^i<n<4, yfll'H'is, f®i<vii-Lttj,< __.....JJ,..6..^2<?<°^t'11_l(o ^ .........^..........^.....................^ ^QP ST^T'q^T ( IC|{^»((^T) sn^'1 w h-u'k 'Q^ 3TI^9T ^)"E^ ^RITWdfel 311^1 • 'SSfVfSf'QV V: ftflfttt .TTT<£flT^i?' ?3'%'ir*T'T ; n^fV^ ^^iEt iSlKM UU0A£.^/.E^ ^'.<E?>4...Il!J'J 22.10.2010 Shri Shaiiendra Dubev, coun; Shri Vivek Sharma, P.L. for t'r tel for the petitioner. te State. ChalSenge in the present 'w^ 24.12.2004 (Annexure P/l) passed after conducting departmental terminated. Counsel for the oetitioner fa( altemative remedy for the petitioner| the C.G. Civil Semoes (Classificatio) and fherefore ends of iustice woij permitted to withdraw this petitionf the competent authority. He howev) issued to the appellate authority ft>i iRnoring the point of limitation. State counsel has no for deciding the appeai of the petitio|-i. Accordingly, the petitioner petition with the aforesaid liberty. by the petitioner before the comp^i three weeks forra the date of re4< expected trom the competent accordance with law, ignoring the pjs It. is made clear that this Cot on merits of the case and the autho|ri to decide the appeal strictly iri +iifi-141-1 im?ff <i fttzt tfsre^ 'hajRnan^i it petition is to the order dated by the respondent N0.2 by which erjg_uiry, the petitioner has been Fajirly submits that there exists an 1 to file an appeal under Ru'le 23 of [1 and Controi) Appeal Rules 1966 Cd be served if the petitioner is .with iiberty to fiie appeal before ;r submits that direction may be ft>r deciding the aopeal on merits objecti^n if any such direction is issued itiotier. is permitted to withdraw this fn the eventuality of filing appeal jtent authority within a period of ;ipt of copy of this order, it is ai^thority to decide the same in bint of limitation. |irt has not expressed any opinion authojrity concemed would be at liberty with law. ^-——-" ailtho accofdance ^r"" iudfee