HIGH coum' OF CHHAmsaARH AT aILAspuk arvM.P.No.44a a 2009 Petitmner Bami @ Manoj, agad abouf 27 years, son of Shri Knnhuiya Kas‘ruriya, resid'en'r of Amapam Ward, Dham'rari, Teh' and Disftbhammri (CG) J , i \ ‘ 1 \ V ‘ 1 i 1 i i 3 Versus State of Chhumsgarh 'thmugh +he v Dish-Id Magmfmfe DIST? Dhamfarl (C6) Responden‘rg l \ ‘ k ( (Pefi'rion undeir Sec'Hon 482 of Cr.P.C.) (53: Hon'bQe Mr. T.P. Shanna, J.) 3 ~ ; Presen‘r ss AAaumshu Chair! counsel for fine peflftoner Mr RaJendm l‘rmnfhl Panel iawyer for “the responden'r/Sfate ‘ ORAL ORDER (Passed on 21'” Angus? 200°} 1 The pefmoner has frled This pe-tmon under Sechon 482 of fhe €ode c Cmmmal Procedure 1973 (m shot-T *rhe Code) agamst fine order dded 305 2009 passed by 'rhe Addmonm sessvons Judge (FTC) Dhammm In: ' Cmmmd Revrslon Na 13/2009 affwmmg fhe order dwed 16 3 2099 passed *1 ' by the Sub Dmslonal Mogls‘rr-Me Dhom‘ron m (‘mmmal Case No Q5/2069 whereby learned Sub Dwnsmml Magisirafe has passed the-prehmlpary order under Seafion 111 of fhe Code and demanded infer-in: securh‘y silo)“; V ‘l'erms of 5ec?ion 116 (3) of The Code. '2. Learned counsel for fhe pe‘trhoner argued 111a? wwhout there being any grlma fame motewal for Im‘l’la'hon of proceedmg under Sec'hon 110 of the J ode, learned sub Dmstonal Maglsfrafe has mlflamd proceedlpg and thereby? commlf'fed illegali'ty and by affirming 'fhe order,yrev§siona$l Cour‘!’ has also commi'rted illegalify and cause serious prejudlced': +0 The pe‘l‘ifioner. r z f ‘ 3. I have hmrd learned counsel far The peti‘l’iong: and peruxé the ordey impugned, cogy of fhe order- of Thz frial Court and cogy of @Qmplainf - (Ish'tgasa). i 4. From per-used of complam-t (Ish'rgasa) and other dacumen‘rs rt uppaars That I _ ‘ numbers ;of the oases have been reglsfered against him on 1he ground of», behavmr éand ac‘hvrry The pohce has flied complaini' (Ish‘l'gasa) before me: Sub Dlvlsmml Mugusfm‘te who afTer snhsfymg Itself h£ passed preltmmary order under- Sechon 110 of the Cede and demanded mwmm sewnn'y m +erms of 5ec+lon 115 (3) of 'rhe Cede for whmh ieamed Sub“ ‘Dwusro3af Mngls‘tmie was compefen'r Learned Sub Dwlsmm! Magistm‘te . has proceeded m ferms of clause (g) of Secflon 110 of The Code ugninct‘ fhe pe‘htkner The presen‘r pe'htmner has no? ftied regly before 1P2 trln! Cour-1' 5. A1- fl'ns § J siege, ' fins pefmon ts pre-mmure Issmnce of arder' under ‘ Sechons 111 and 11b(3) of The Code pmma fame agpeurs fo be based an the I I} mammal I do no+ fmd any ground for inferference m terms of $ec‘ho 482 of the Code. 6. Consequently, The petition is Hobie 1‘0 be dismiesed and i‘rmis‘lgerrepy dismissed a? ihe sfege of admission. ’ I ‘ \ ‘ I H I ‘ ’ ‘ behavior ’of The pe'W'Ioner is desperate and dangerous fa 'rhe same-w and I N7“ We sw‘. ' I 1 "IZP. SHARMA. i Judge —7; --~"—.-s 1 i v } V ? I i t I n wide*