IK THE HIOH COU5T OF JUDICATUHB AT BILASPUR :HHA'FTISGAEB W.P. N0, /2Q06 ii» > PBTITIONER RBSPONDENTS r -Tyn-^ ^^ ^/^5S« CiS-^ 'w " : <^ Laxminarayan Dewangan, Aged 57 years, S/o. Shri Babas Ram Dewangan, R/o. Katagi, Kasdol, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VBRSUS 11 State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretarv, Education Deptt, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.j District Education Officer, Raipur Pension Bada, Raipur District Rsdpur (C.G.) 3] Director of PubUc Instruction Pension Bada, Raipur, District- Raipur fC.G.) WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLB 226/227 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1^;^ffis:w:' XI-HC-22 'Svl ^||^ld<j, E?T?|WIS, f%iyy flKW) 9ifWfSi .i^£......^l sn^i^i R-ii* st^fv ^•Rfcfi ^f^cf --V Gowri ^. ^ ^'<y cB y •3I^?I TRIWO^T 27-1-2006 Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, couns^l for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Rajput, Dy. Govt. Adv.j Heard; cbMfl'tJ-i)-l ^WvS 4 'fe'Zt <F»t+ril( ^srfSgHsn^r forthe State, on advance copy. Learned counsel for the petitio|ier submits that the petitioner has completed more than 24 years . sei^ice, but benefit of Time Bound PFomotion Schems has not been givg|i to him. He further submits that in simifar matter i.e. W.P. No.6504/200p (V.K. Shrivastava vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others), an order fjas been passed by this Court on 4-1-2006. He praysfor similar order. | State counsel does not dispute <he above fact. ' Having considered the facts arjd circumstances and in viev/ ofthe fact that the petitioner has complet^d more than 24 years 6f regular sen/ice and has not been given thei Scheme and further in view of ojrder passed in similarcase i.e. W.P.No.6504/2005, it is direeted that and decide the case of the petitioner] beneflt of Time Bound Prbmotion the concerned a'uthority to consider in accordance with law forgrant of time bound promotion. Accordingly, the petition is altov|?ed. Certified copy as per rules. Copy to State counsel for comp|liance. ( Sc'/- Fakhruda'iri Judge [^*te^ i