IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No. 1309 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 6, 2010 J.C.T. Electronics Workers Union and another …Appellants Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. Rajiv Narain Raina, Advocate, and Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate, for the appellants. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against the order dated 6.5.2010 rendered by the learned Single Judge disallowing certain paragraphs of the grounds pleaded in the application bearing C.M. No. 6312 of 2010 in CWP No. 7804 of 2001. The learned Single Judge has also rejected the prayer of the appellants concerning averments made in excess of the case pleaded in paragraph 6 of the Amendment Application bearing C.M. No. 2636 of 2010. 2. Without going into the merit of the controversy of the aforesaid order we are of the considered view that no prejudice is likely to be caused to the appellants, especially when the main matter is still pending on the Regular LPA No. 1309 of 2010 (O&M) Board of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjit Singh at Sr. No. 1157. Moreover, such like order, if required, could also be challenged along with the main judgment in terms of Order XLIII Rule 1A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The aforesaid right of the appellants would not be defeated and shall remain intact. Accordingly we dismiss the appeal. However, the right of the appellants under Order XLIII Rule 1A CPC shall remain intact and they shall be entitled to seek quashing of order dated 6.5.2010 after the final decision of the writ petition, if any such necessity arises. 3. The appeal stands disposed of in the above terms. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (RITU BAHRI) October 6, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2