IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10190 of 1990 YASHWANT KAUR Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 20/ 06.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Evidence of prosecution is closed by the Court that order (Cr. Misc. No. 8934 of 2000) is challenged for quashing and that is pending for hearing. Petitioner remained free during trial period and really, her arrest was stayed but neither the trial was hampered nor witnesses were tempered and it is the C.B.I. itself that there is no progress in trial of the case. Once, an attempt was made on behalf of the prosecution agency to arrest the petitioner but her physical condition was found not fit to carry her for remand and according to the learned counsel, the allegation of taking Rs. 60/- for allowing powers for Court and realizing of money after release of inmate finds no reliable support from the witness examined up-till-now and petitioner is apprehending her arrest which is not justified. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within 2 one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Crime No. RC 2/90-ACU (VIII), above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge C.B.I. Patna subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)