1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 73/2009 IN A.O.St. No. 2450/2009 Sou. Anusaya Gomaji Deomal and another ..versus.. Gokuldas Mohanlal Miniyar and others =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-== Shri R.L.Ghonge, Counsel for applicant/appellant. C ORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 11th JUNE, 2010. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2) Civil application is moved, seeking condoation in preferring the appeal against order. 3) During the course of submissions, learned counsel submits, the order under challenge by the learned Judge in Special Civil Suit No. 850 of 2008, rejecting Exh.5, is dated 26.9.2008 and not 26.8.2008, consequently, the application seeking challenge the same is in limitation. 4) I find substance in the contentions raised by the 2 learned counsel. That apart, even if there is delay, the delay being of minimal of 28 days, it should not foreclose the rights of the plaintiff. Consequently, the application is allowed. No costs. (K.U.Chandiwal) JUDGE. Rvjalit