W C g 4 Bum'ok” ’iqb “ON'HJéA‘ .Lmi COURT OF CuiiA'VTlbGhm-i:BinAbP‘JK (4 r J”# :‘aecond Appeal Neg—9?— o£§/00§; gPELLxwT Bnaskar Singh, aged SO years S/o Khamhan Singh, Caste-Rajput, occupation—iagriculture, r98 idem: of village Hatimewara, Tab. - Janjgir, Dist?“ , Janjgire-Champa (COG. ) . VER$US Shambhu Eirasad, aged 45 years 53/0 Umawatta, resident of Rani Road, Korioa, Tahsiln Korba (C,G.) Vakil Singh, aged 3O yearso Prahalad Sing‘n, aged 27 years. Kashi Singh, aged 23 years, Gem Singh, aged 2]. years Nos° 2 to 5 are sons of Bhajram S ingh . Smt. Narmada Bai, aged 5O years Widow of late Bhajram Singh. Kripal Singh, aged 65 years S/o Khamhan Singh. All by casterc‘nhatri, residents 033 village Hathnewara, Tahsil‘ Janjgir, Disttv. Janjgir-Champa(CG).‘ (8) State of Chhattisgarh Through : Co llector , ‘Janjgir—Champa (CaG. ) o “cucontde... SECQND APPEAL UNDER SECTION X06 C 9 cfsAmST w/b JUDGEIVIENT PASSED ON 19 wb ) m CNIL APPHAL. Non 22—Af§9 “BHAQXAR QINGd AND VhKbUb $1—IAMBHU PRASAD AND S VLN QTI‘ILRS“ UNDLR EHE FOLLOWING FACTS AND GROUNDS AMONéST OTHERS. UST mef: Ev 1m, ‘1’oNAL DIS LRICT J mm Ry: HAymA, JmJGm { a“ i th G U L XivHC-22 E§g§f§ 16-4-2003- No one appears for the parties. when the matter is called. In terms of the order dated 31/03/2003 the appellant ‘was required to mmove the default; pointed out by the omce. 0mge note dated 07—04-2003 indicates that The defaults have not been removed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for :1on~prosecution/non—compliance. / i Sd/- ?.C.Naik "x Judge 1 v # (z Knish... (r {were}