IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6245 of 2009 KUMAR PARAS NATH SINGH AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS SON OF LATE GAGANDEO SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST OFFICE BASDILA, POLICE STATION JALALPUR BAZAR DISTRICT – SARAN. Versus 1. THE BIAHR STATE CO-OPERATIVE LAND DEVELOPMENT BANK SAMITI, BUDH MARG, PATNA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE COOPERATIVE LAND DEVELOPMENT BANK SAMITI, BUDH MARG, PATNA. 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR STATE COOPERATIVE LAND DEVELOPMENT BANK SAMITI BUDH MARG, PATNA. 4. THE CHIEF VIGILANCE OFFICER, BIHAR STATE COOPERATIVE LAND DEVELOPMENT BANK SAMITI BUDH MARG, PATNA. ----------- 16. 06.05.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the respondent – Bank. The grievance of the petitioner is that petitioner superannuated on 28th of February 2006 as In-charge Branch Manager of respondent–Bank, however, full retiral dues on account of gratuity and leave encashment including some arrears of salary have not been settled and paid till date despite several request. It is also submitted that arrears of salary with effect from the date of promotion and monetary benefits ought to have been given with effect from 01.07.1995 whereas the bank has granted the same from the year 1996 which according to the petitioner is not correct. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Bank submits that the payment on account of gratuity and leave encashment is 2 sanctioned as per the office order vide Memo No 2378 dated 31st of August 2009 as contained in Annexure- A to the counter affidavit wherein after adjusting the advances taken by the petitioner as indicated therein a sum of Rs. 1, 47, 502/- is found payable which shall be paid to the petitioner in Chronological order as per the date of respective retirement. It is further submitted that claims for arrears of salary needs to be verified and after verification if it is found payable the same shall be considered for payment as per the payment scheme of the bank in chronological orders, however depending on the facts of each case. Considering the submission of the parties, respondent–Bank is hereby directed to make the necessary payments of the retiral dues as per the scheme of the bank at the earliest including the admissible arrears of salary. It will be open for the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the respondent no. 3 with regard to any discrepancy in calculation as indicated in Annexure- A besides any other claim admissible as per rule. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)