1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application No. 1117/2008 IN Writ Petition No. 4108/2007 (DECIDED) (Ku.Minakshi Gulabrao Narnaware VERSUS The Scheduled Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee & others ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Parsodkar, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Puranik, counsel for the R-1. CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 12, 2008. Heard. This civil application is moved by the petitioner/applicant seeking direction to the respondent no.2 to declare the result of the applicant of 1st year B.A.M.S. Mr. Puranik, the learned counsel for the Caste Scrutiny Committee, contended that the Caste Scrutiny Committee has invalidated the caste claim of the petitioner. It is not in dispute that the petitioner had secured admission in the said course from the reserved category and since the caste claim of the petitioner is invalidated, the direction sought by the petitioner, at this stage, is not possible for us to grant. 2 Hence, the civil application is disposed of accordingly with liberty to raise appropriate challenge to the order of the Caste Scrutiny Committee if the applicant so desire. JUDGE JUDGE APTE