: 1 : conp-4-10=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 4 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 1777 OF 2004 Salma Asgarali Makati & Ors. .. Plaintiffs v/s. Shabbir S. Pachorawala & Ors. .. Respondents And Mr. O.K. Vasudevan Partner of Okay Transport Corporation .. Contemnor ......... Mr. Alli A. Zaidy i/by Zaidy & Co. for the plaintiffs ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 15th OCTOBER, 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard learned Counsel Mr. Zaidy. On hearing him, it is apparent that a particular person who was appointed as Agent of the Court Receiver was required to pay certain amount of monies by way of rent to the Court Receiver. According to the order which was brought to the notice of this Court being order dated 6th October, 2010, Court Receiver was to collect the rent and that is how responsibility was cast on the Court Receiver. The petitioners ought to have moved the Court Receiver making the grievance about the non-payment of rent from : 2 : conp-4-10=.sxw time to time and call upon the Court Receiver to prepare the report and obtain orders from the Court. 2. In my view, on the basis of the facts disclosed, no prima-facie case is made out. There is a procedure available to the petitioners to have the rent collected or to have the person who is liable to pay the rent removed with the assistance of the Court with the intervention of the Court Receiver. In the circumstances mentioned aforesaid, no prima-faice case is made out. Contempt Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. If as of today, the contemnor have not paid the rent, it is open for the petitioners to have the rent collected or have make specific request to the Court Receiver to move the court for appropriate orders. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)