^ HIGHCOURT OF GHHATTISQARH AT BILASRJR Vim^reTIT10»l2SyNek32^^2aSJr~— PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Smt Indrani Sirdar, W/o Shri Klrtm ?irdar, aged about 38 yeais, R/o Purana Bas Stand Janjgir (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarii, Throu^i Secretary, EducaUon Deparbnsnt, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director of Public Instruction, Pensionbada, Raipur (C.G.) WRtT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Single Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justtee Satfsh K. /^inlhotri Present: h4r. Kumaresh Tiwari, Advosate for Uie (^itioner. Mr. Aroind Dubey, Panel lawyer forthe respondents/Stete. ORDER (Passed on 13tn day of June, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the peUtionsr as well as ter V Stete/respondents jointly submtt that the fact and quesUon of law invoh/ed in ttie present writ peUtion are the same to that <rf in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporatlon, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been dlspesed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not contrevert the said submissiwi. 2. Accordingty, the writ peUtlon is allowed in tenns rf the order presed in the case of Yashwant Kumar BharadwaJ V». Municipal Corporatton, Durg and another (Supra), subject to veriflcation of the fact as to whether the petttioner has acqulred B.Ed. ExaminaUon Certificate on her own expenses as per the cireulare dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether she has been paid tuo sxlvance increments or not. No order as to cosls. Bablu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^