1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.52 OF 2009 Mrs.Sushama Sachin Barhate ..Applicant V/s Mr.Sachin Ravindra Barhate ..Respondent ---- Mr. Rahul S.Kadam for the applicant. Mr. K.K.Malpathak for the respondent. ---- Coram : R.S.MOHITE,J Date : 17th August, 2009. PC 1 Heard both sides. Rule. By consent, rule heard forthwith. 2 This is an application made under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure by a wife for transfer of a divorce proceedings filed by her husband, from the Court of Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan to the Family Court, Pune. Parties last resided together at Kalyan and therefore, husband has filed a divorce proceedings at Kalyan. The ground for transfer is that the applicant has just delivered a child and it will not be convenient for her to attend the proceedings at Kalyan. This aspect of the matter is not challenged by the respondent-husband. In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court has held that convenience of the wife is a very important factor for deciding the transfer application. In the circumstances, in my view, the prayer sought cannot be said to be unreasonable. Rule is 2 therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clause-(a). Record & proceedings be urgently transferred from the Court of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan to the Family Court at Pune. Parties agree that they will appear before the Family Court, Pune on 12.10.2009 and waive notice. The matter to appear on board before the Family Court, Pune on 12.10.2009. (R.S.MOHITE,J) 3