IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2011 / 13TH MAGHA 1932 LA.App..No. 941 of 2009() ------------------------- ( LAR.321/2005 of PRL. SUB COURT,THALASSERY) .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT NO.2 ----------------------------------------------- MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSIDC, REP. BY ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, KSIDC, KESTON ROAD, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOBY CYRIAC, SC, KSIDC RESPONDENTS/CLAIMANT AND R1 ---------------------------------------------------- 1. SHRI.MURIKKOLI BALAN, S/O.GOVINDAN, SUHAS, PAZHASSI, MATTANNUR. 2. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, L.A., THALASSERY. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: LA.App..No. 941 of 2009() ----------------------------------------- IA. NO.2732/2009 IN LAA.941/2009 DISMISSED 2.2.2011 Sd/- HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ L.A.A.No.941 Of 2009 ---------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2011. J U D G M E N T The Managing Director, KSIDC, who is the requisitioning authority, is the appellant. The appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in L.A.R.No.321 of 2005 on the file of the Sub Court, Thalassery. An extent of 0.247 cents of land was acquired for the purpose of road widening for Industrial Growth Centre, Kuthuparambu as per notification dated 30.1.2001. The Land Acquisition Officer fixed the land value at the rate of Rs.3,899/- per cent. The reference court enhanced the land value and re-fixed at the rate of Rs.15,000/-. 2. I have gone through the impugned judgment. The claim is for enhanced compensation at the rate of Rs.40,000/- per cent. The extent acquired is less than a cent. Considering the said fact, I do not think that it is necessary to examine the contentions raised by the appellant that the land value fixed by the court below is on a higher side. The said contentions can be considered in an appropriate case. Therefore, I do not propose to ::2:: L.A.A.No.941 Of 2009 accept the grounds of appeal and to interfere with the fixation of the land value. The appeal fails and accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-