... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1214 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1214 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1214 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1148 OF 2006 Vasant Ramchandra Samudre ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Shri Manohar Kandalkar with Shriram Shirsat for the Applicant. Ms S.V.Gajare, A.P.P for the Respondent. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 27, 2006. DATE : NOVEMBER 27, 2006. DATE : NOVEMBER 27, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate for the Applicant and learned A.P.P for the State. The Applicant has been convicted for offences punishable under section 7 and section 13(1)(d) read with section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The substantive sentences are ordered to run concurrently. The maximum substantive sentence is rigorous imprisonment for one year. Fine amount has been already paid on 31st October, 2006. The learned Trial Judge granted protection under section 389(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in favour of the Applicant on the date on which he was convicted. The Applicant was on bail ... 2 ... throughout the trial and there is no allegation of misuse of liberty granted in his favour. 2. Hence, Application is disposed of by passing following order: (i) The Applicant shall be enlarged on the same bail on which he was enlarged during the pendency of the trial subject to filing fresh bail bonds. (ii) The Applicant will report to the office of Anti-Corruption Bureau, Kolhapur once in every calender month till the disposal of the Appeal. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE