1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3914/2004 Amar Singh & anr. Vs. ADJ, Sangaria & ors. Date : 6.5.2005 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. Pankaj Sharma, for the petitioner. Mr. Kishan Bansal, for respondents. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of the trial court dated 1.4.2004 by which the petitioner’s evidence was closed despite the fact that an application for adjournment was submitted. It appears that earlier the case was adjourned for evidence of the defendant on 14.1.2004, 13.2.2004 and 12.3.2004. Looking to the nature of the suit and peculiar facts of the case that the advocate for defendants no.3 and 4 was also not available on 1.4.2004, this Court deems it proper to grant one more opportunity to the petitioners to produce their all witnesses before the trial court on payment of costs of Rs.2,000/- to the plaintiff within a period of fifteen days. The trial court may now fix the date for evidence of the defendants and the defendants may be granted maximum two dates for completion of their evidence 2 provided the cross examination are completed by the parties to the suit. In view of the above, this writ petition is allowed, the order dated 1.4.2004 is set aside and the trial court may give an opportunity to the petitioners for evidence as mentioned above. The stay petition also stands disposed of accordingly. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya