IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc. No. M-3487 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 9.3.2010 Raj Kumar ......Petitioner vs. State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY. PRESENT: Mr.Mohit Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Bhavna Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. **** ORDER The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 177 dated 10.9.2009 under Sections 420/406/465/467/468/471/120-B IPC registered at Police Station Sadar Sunam District Sangrur. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case and he has no role in sanctioning the loan or in preparing the false salary certificates and moreover the petitioner is not named in the FIR . Ms.Bhavna Gupta, learned counsel for the State, submits that three FIRs have been registered against the present petitioner and in two FIRs, PO proceedings have been initiated against him. Even the anticipatory bail has already been dismissed as he did not join the investigation. I have heard the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the contents of the FIR. . Crl.Misc. No. M-3487 of 2010 [2] The allegations against the petitioner are that he had forged the documents with regard to salary certificate and has been introducing various persons to ICICI Bank for grant of loan. The allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature and in two FIRs PO proceedings have been initiated because of non- joining of the investigation and moreover the anticipatory bail in a similar case has already been declined. Keeping in view the facts mentioned above, no ground for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. The petition is dismissed. (DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE March 9, 2010. raghav