CMPMO No. 44 of 2007 14.09.2010 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Heard in part. List for continuation on 15th September, 2010. (Deepak Gupta) Judge September 14, 2010 (KRS) CWP No. 4084 of 2010 14.09.2010 Present: Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents No. 1 and 2. Respondent No. 3 served, but not present, hence proceeded against ex parte. At the request of Sh. Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General, last opportunity of four weeks’ is granted to file reply. List the matter on 25th October, 2010. Interim directions shall continue till next date. (Deepak Gupta) Judge September 14, 2010 (KRS) CWP No. 3702 of 2010 14.09.2010 Present: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Shashi Sirshoo, Advocate, for the respondent. Mr. Shashi Sirshoo, Advocate appearing for the respondent states that pursuant to the orders of this Court dated 9.8.2010, the petitioner has been retained at Mandi. He has placed on record a copy of order dated 16.8.2010. In view of this development, petition has become infructuous and disposed of accordingly. (Deepak Gupta) Judge September 14, 2010 (KRS) CWP No. 3305 of 2010 14.09.2010 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent No. 1. Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent No. 4. Petitioner by means of this petition has challenged the order dated 4.6.2010, whereby he has been transferred from Balika Asharam Chilli, District Chamba to Gaddi Hostel, Mehela, District Chamba vice respondent No. 3. The undisputed facts are that the petitioner is working as Incharge Superintendent since his initially appointment in the year, 1997. No doubt, the petitioner has only two years to retire, but the fact is that he has remained at Chilli for almost 13 years. No employee has a vested right to remain posted in same place for his entire charier. Therefore, I find no merit in the writ petition, accordingly the same is dismissed. There is no orders as to cost. (Deepak Gupta) Judge September 14, 2010 (KRS) CWP No. 3331 of 2010 14.09.2010 Present: Mr. Man Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General, vise Mr. Sandeep Sharma, ASGI for the respondents. Learned Deputy Advocate General for the respondent submits that name of the Assistant Solicitor General is not reflected in the cause list. Registry is directed to list the matter on 27th September, 2010. Registry is to ensure that in the cause list name of the learned Assistant Solicitor General be reflected. (Deepak Gupta) Judge September 14, 2010 (KRS) CWP No. 1963 of 2010 14.09.2010 Present: Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents. Reply has been filed only by respondent No. 2. Respondent No. 1 may also filed reply within four weeks’. Rejoinder, if any, within two weeks. List on 1st November, 2010. (Deepak Gupta) Judge September 14, 2010 (KRS) CWP No. 1637 of 2010 14.09.2010 Present: Mr. Dushyant Dadhwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shilpa Sood, Central Government Counsel, for respondent No. 1. Mr. K.D. Sood, Advocate, for the respondent No. 2. Mr. S.R. Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. B.N. Mishra, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. Pleadings are not complete. Replies have only been filed by respondents No. 2 and 4. The other respondents may file replies within four weeks’ from today. Rejoinder within four weeks’ thereafter. List for hearing in due course. (Deepak Gupta) Judge September 14, 2010 (KRS) CWP No. 4914 of 2010 14.09.2010 Present: Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents. Reply not filed. Be filed within four weeks’. Rejoinder, if any within two weeks. List on 9th November, 2010. (Deepak Gupta) Judge September 14, 2010 (KRS) CWP No. 4438 of 2010 14.09.2010 Present: Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents. Reply not filed. Reply be filed on or before 20th October, 2010. Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate, appearing for the petitioner submits that similar petition has been disposed of by an order passed by Division Bench of this Court, presided by Hon’ble the Chief Justice. He wants to place the copy of said order on record. List on 25th October, 2010. (Deepak Gupta) Judge September 14, 2010 (KRS) CWP No. 2312 of 2010 14.09.2010 Present: Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents. Reply not filed. Reply be filed on or before 20th October, 2010. Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate, appearing for the petitioner submits that similar petition has been disposed of by an order passed by Division Bench of this Court, presided by Hon’ble the Chief Justice. He wants to place the copy of said order on record. List on 25th October, 2010. (Deepak Gupta) Judge September 14, 2010 (KRS) CWP No. 2053 of 2009 14.09.2010 Present: Mr. A.K. Gupta Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents. The dispute raised in this petition is with regard to the pay scale, to which they are entitled, but there are many cases of dismissed and terminated employees pending, therefore, I do not find any urgency in hearing this petition. List for hearing in due course. (Deepak Gupta) Judge September 14, 2010 (KRS)