IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 3066 of 2008 (OA No 4551 of 1996 Date of decision: 6.8.2010 Ganga Ram and others ….. Petitioner Vs. State of H.P.& Ors. …. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the Petitioners : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General with Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. Advocate General and Mrs. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. Kuldip Singh, J(Oral). The prayer made in the petition is mainly as follows:- (i) That the order dated 15.7.95 rejecting the claim of the applicants for regularization of their service may very kindly be quashed and set aside. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that petitioners have been regularized. The prayer made in the petition is for quashing of the order dated 15.7.1995. The perusal of order dated 15.7.1995 indicates Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes …2… that a finding of fact has been recorded that all applicants have not completed the stipulated continuous service of 10 years as on 31.12.93 to 31.12.94 with a minimum of 240 days in a calendar year as laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya case, hence they cannot be appointed as work charged as represented by them. Later on petitioners have been regularized. Since the petitioners have been regularized, they have been granted the main relief, nothing survives in the petition which is accordingly dismissed. August 6, 2010 (Kuldip Singh), (sks) Judge.