IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.7710 of 2010 RITO YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 10.03.2010 This case has come under the heading „To Be Mentioned‟ at the instance of the court in view of the fact that in the application prayer portion has not been given although the petitioner was granted bail on 8.3.2010. Today, counsel for the petitioner has filed a supplementary affidavit mentioning the prayer portion of the main application and submits that due to inadvertence he could not mention the same in the main application. Let the same be incorporated with the main application. Accordingly, in the eighth line of third paragraph of order dated 8.3.2010, after the word „each ‟ following words may be read “to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, in connection with Madhepura P.S. case no. 392 of 2009 (G.R. No.1548 of 2009”. The order dated 8.3.2010 stands modified to the aforesaid extent. Let this order as well as order dated 8.3.2010 be communicated to the court below mentioned above through fax at the cost of the petitioner. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)