IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27939 of 2010 BINOD DAS @ BINOD RAM S/O LATE BHAGAT DAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 24.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 384, 386, 436, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the loader of the informant was set on fire by some miscreants. The background of the case is that the petitioner and the co- accused had come two days prior to the occurrence demanding extortion and therefore, it was assumed that the occurrence took place on non-fulfillment of the demand. It is submitted that the alleged loader was not put on fire by the petitioner and in the two earlier case instituted against him he is on bail. Considering that while on bail petitioner committed this occurrence and has, therefore, clearly misused the privilege of bail, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the serious nature of the offence. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )