IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13984 of 2010 RAMPATI DAS SON OF SUKH LAL DAS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O. SONABHADRA, P.S. KARPI, DISTRICT ARWAL. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE P[RINCIPAL SECRETARY, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, DEPARTMENT, BIHAR PATNA VIKASH BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD , PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT, VIKASH BHAWAN, BAILOEY ROAD, PATNA. 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR CATTLE (D.V) LARGE CATTLE DEVELOPMENT (PROJECT) FIELD LEVEL BIKRAM (PATNA) 4. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR PATNA BIREHAND PATEL MARG PATNA 5. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL PROVIDENT FUND PANT BHAWAN BAILEY ROAD PATNA. 6. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER PATNA COLLECTRIATE, PATNA ----------- 02. 26.08.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that petitioner has received his retiral dues after superannuation on 30th of November 1998 as Veterinary Supervisor while working under the respondent no. 3. However, the entire provident fund dues has not been paid to the petitioner since petitioner has received only a sum of Rs. 1,17,294/- on account of provident fund dues. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the averments made in the petition as 2 well as in the representation is not clear with regard to the claim of the petitioner. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 6. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)