IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27252 of 2010 1. ARUN KUMAR SINHA, S/o Late Ram Narain Prasad. 2. Amit Kumar alias Amit Sinha alias Gunjan. 3. Chandan Kumar. Both 2 and 3 are sons of Arun Kumar Sinha. All Resident of Mohalla-Naigo Down Lane, P.S.-Kotwali, Dist.-Gaya. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Uma Yadav, S/o Kailash Yadav @ Kusash Yadav, R/o Village-Habibpur,near Cotton Mill Crossing Gaya, P.S.-Chandauti, Dist.-Gaya. ----------- 02. 14.02.2011 The petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 14.06.2010 passed by Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gaya in Complaint Case No. 27 of 2006, Tr. No. 1101 of 2010 by which he has refused to discharge the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that in fact before the present complaint was instituted the petitioners had filed an informatory petition. The further submission is that when the petitioners had moved before this Court earlier a direction had been given that the matter would be considered at the stage of framing of charge but the Trial Court did not consider the materials. At this stage the defence of the accused can not be gone into by considering previous litigations. Further, I find that the impugned order has considered materials that had appeared while passing present impugned order. It is well-known principle of law that at the stage of charge threadbare discussion of the prosecution case can not be done and, therefore, finding no merit in the application, the same is dismissed. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)