XI—HC-22 D.B: Hon'ble Shri Justice Fakhruddin, Hon’ble sin-i Justice L.C. ‘Bhadooy, JJ V¢ e" 29.07.2003 This is an 'omcc referencc. / V11, Shri Sunil Sinha, Addl. Advocate General, for the State. ' Shri A.K. Vijayavargb a, Addl. Chief Secretary, has med ‘ 1 \V an affidavit. Paras 3 and 4 of the amid aifldavit are pertinent, which axe quoted below: “.3. The complaint so far as‘it lelates Lo illegal payment to Regional Transport Office staff by R.T.O; Agents is totally general and vague and Without any substantial evidence. If any specific complaint received then it will be enquired into and if found correct, necessary-action will be taken against the culprits. It is respectfimy submitted that neither the State Government nor the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the rules ~made thereunder recognizes any person \ - as “R.T.O. Agent? 4.The officers of the Transport Department wtu’le dealing with Motor A Vehicles Act, entertains either only the tM ‘. ‘ j [aleW XI»HC—22 WWIEWW $Wm ‘4‘“ ‘ ig y ‘ Owners of the vi ¥ ‘ authorised by t Shri Sinha submits t‘ check—ups and suitable 1n change of numbers (series) 1n the \ submitted that so faraas - vehicles istcroncemed, sui table instnicn‘ons were issued and this has been done. In view of the abo‘ dropped, leaving open to such steps Wh1ch they thJ observations, this petition stands W1th the afonesmd disposed of. ehicles or the persons duly hem.” hat the authorities will do periodical atructions Will be issued It 1s also 1 t .\ re statement, the proceedings are the authorities concerned to take [1k propefghonvenienutgthe Imblic. Sdl- Fakhruddin 1 j ‘ Judge i 1 l / \ V Sci/— J L.C.BHADOO i Judge l //’ / l [ElieW Nsé