IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Rev. No.3158 of 2011. Date of decision: December 15, 2011. Gurdial Singh .. Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and another .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI * * * PRESENT Mr.M.S.Sachdev, Adv., for the petitioner. M.M.S.BEDI, J (ORAL). Petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 28.11.2011, passed by the trial Court dismissing an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C., filed by the petitioner to re-summon PW.4 Kewal Singh and PW.5 Gurmeet Kaur, for cross-examination in context to two aspects i.e., it was petitioner Gurdial Singh who had called the police and there being the previous enmity due to electoral dispute on account of political party faction. I have heard the counsel for the petitioner, at length and I am of the opinion that the two facts which the petitioner wants to put to the prosecution witnesses by re-summoning them can be proved by the petitioners independently by producing defence evidence or otherwise. No ground is made out to exercise the revisional jurisdiction to interfere in the impugned order. Dismissed. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE December 15, 2011. rka