IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.10766 of 2008 Between: Wattamar Rajeshwar S/o Sangamnath R/o Gulla Village, Jukkal Mandal, Nizamabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bodhan, Nizamabad District. 2 District Supply Officer, Nizamabad District, Nizamabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing order bearing No. E1/683/2007 dt.18-04-2007 and not completing the statutory enquiry as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to law, without the authority of law, contrary to ratio laid down by this Hon'ble Court in Joint Collector, Kurnool, Vs. A. Neelima reported in 1996 (1) APLJ 285 and also contrary to the specific direction made by this Honble Court on 9th July 2007 in W.P.No. 14535 of 2007 and consequentially direct the respondents to restore the fair price shop Dealership of the petitioner forthwith in the interest of Justice and pass such other and further order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.MILIND G GOKHALE Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.10766 OF 2008 ORDER: M r . Satish Kumar, learned counsel, representing Mr. Milind G Gokhale, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 26th November, 2008. IBL