IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-34041 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.03.2011 Atamjit Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Ms. Priya Khurana, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG Haryana for the respondent – State Mr. Chander Shekhar, Advocate for the complainant/respondent No. 2 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Mr. Atamjit Singh and Ms. Prabhpreet Kaur were present before this Court yesterday also. Both of them have stated that they are ready and willing to live together at matrimonial home at Noida. Ms. Prabhpreet Kaur – complainant/respondent No. 2 duly identified by Mr. Chander Shekhar, Advocate has stated that she will go with the petitioner – accused and perform her matrimonial duties. Petitioner – Atamjit Singh duly identified by Mr. Priya Khurana, Advocate has stated that he is ready and willing to live with respondent No. 2 peacefully at Noida. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG Haryana on the instructions of ASI Vrishbhan Singh has stated that he has no objection if both the Crl. Misc. No. M-34041 of 2010 (O&M) 2 parties are ready and willing to settle the dispute and to live together peacefully. In view of the statements made above, no further order is required to be passed except that both the parties i.e. petitioner and respondent No. 2 shall live together at Noida and shall not give any complaint to each other. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (ALOK SINGH) 08.03.2011 JUDGE reena