IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32494 of 2011 Sochindra Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 15.10.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the complainant purchased the land from one Tej Narayan Yadav and when he went to plough the said land, the petitioner did not allow the complainant to plough the said land and claimed to have purchased the same from Tej Narayan Yadav. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner earlier purchased 3 Kathas of land from Tej Narayan Yadav. Considering the nature of accusation, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 1841 2 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Saharsa, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)