IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.16672 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: October 19, 2006 Rattan Singh ….Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and others …..Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA PRESENT: Shri Kanwaljit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). Notice of motion to the respondents. On the asking of Court, Shri Sukhdip Singh Brar, Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Copies of the writ petition have been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of directions to allot a plot to the petitioner as a local displaced person as per the regulations of the State Government. It has been claimed that similarly situated persons have already been allotted the plots. At the outset, Shri Kanwaljit Singh, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be satisfied if, at this stage, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent Improvement Trust, Batala to take a final CWP NO.16672 of 2006 -2- decision on the legal notice dated October 28,2005 (Annexure P.9) which has already been issued by the petitioner for redressal of his grievances. Keeping in view the stand taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner, but without commenting on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, we dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondent No.3, Improvement Trust, Batala to take a final decision on the aforesaid legal notice (Annexure P.9) issued by the petitioner within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is received, by passing a detailed and speaking order. A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. (Viney Mittal) Judge October 19, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla) KD Judge