-HC—78 ^n^T^^fN? wr3^ST^^> v T~ y ^^eii th*iici» "3^ ^IFTf^R, ^Tll ^4i<o, 1«l<li^y ...^..fi2.a...A.i.^oo OT^T <q?W (<^3SI^t!T) ^ywc'^f?^ an^r PBTiriOaBR Ashok jKumai' Patel, S/'o Siiri Degree Lal Patel, ^ge(1 about 27 years; Qcciipation- Service ftwsted as Shiksha Karmi, Class-iII at Prhziai^ School Khamardadar Jaiipad Pao.chatat Piuiora, District Maiiasamund (CG\ ^ s;r^&si3 1. 2. 3. State of Paacha^ D.K.S. CoUecto4, IvIahasaAiiuid Cn-ief E-1 Pitliora, 4. Distiict District 5. Chief E^ Maiiasajrbi; WRJT PETTTION AK-TICte SB:HON. ft 2.8-1-2009 Shii Suiiil Saliu, cotiii^el ShriM.P.y. Bhatia, Dy. Heard. Grievaiice of tlie petition^ Karmi Grade-lii vicle order dat< 28.6.2007. However, his appoui Writ Petition (S) No.771/08 b mtenm order dated 6.2.200S petitioner gave liis jommg on ebl^lid4l^ 'HI^f'?? fe^ Tf^?R ^^fiw^^n^r Chhattisgarh, tlirough Secretaiy, ^t and Social Welfare Department ^h.awaii, Raipur, Disuict- Raipur (CG) Mahasainund, District- (CG) : ^ecutive Officer, Jajipad Paiichayat plstrict-MaliasaixiurKl (CG) Ecliication Officer, Maliasamund, ^aliasamiind (CG) scutive Omcer, Disuict Paiicliayat ?jr|iund, Distiict-Mahasajnund (CG) 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTION OF ISHRA. J. }lor tlie petitiuuer, Gbvt. Advocate for the State. |r is that he was appomted as Shiksha |d 25,6.2007. He jouied his services on u-2|tment was caiiceBed, The petitioner filed aore Uiis Court aad tliis C^urt passed vide Annexure P-2, Thereafter, tlie 11.2.2008, Ultmiat.ely, vide order clated F t: % 1 1 i N1.^^HC-78 3R^ST^r^rNi* 1W OT^?l ^Fqw -,^ ^ ^ ^ ^) ^ ^ "3^ ^l^id'ii, 'y>Tl1^<Jli^, fs(<rii<-i^< IINCTI (hHKh "^200 ^a^^w (<i°if^<^) ^iwc^rf^y^T^ 2- 14.3.2008, the petition (W.P{ other petitions were allowed However, fiie respondents ar{ liis jommg on 11. 2.2008. Leanied counsel for apprciaciiiiig fhe authority however, the respondeiits hal furtiier submits tliat tlie representation before the gnevances raisea ui Uiis .made, the respondeut No.3 witliiii specified period. On the other liaiid, the petitioner files fresti repi^ redressal ofhis grievaiices, the respondent No.3 withm receipt ol representation, in view of tlie above sulj tiie iiistaiit petition is dispos fresh represeiitation ijefore grievaiices i^ised in tliis the respondent No.3 shaU cor| of four weeks from the date ^lici tlie tlUJl€ thfc 4»l^id^1^4^rfl 1Sf fs^l Xfa^K ^37f^T3^T :S} No.771/08) filed by tlie petitioner aiid the order oftermiiiation was quashed. not payiiig salaiy to Uie pe.titiouer after petitioner submits ttiat he has been t|iiiie aiid again for releasing his salai7y, ?e not taken aiiy action iii tlie matter, He p^tittoii^r may be Reszaitted to Sle fresh li'espondent No.3 for redressal of his pe|:rtiou and on such representatbn being .i^; l |be turther directfed ^to decide the saaie leahied counsei for UieJState submits that if ^sentatiDu before Uie; respondent No.3 for same shall be considered aiid decidecl Dy ^ periocl of tour weeks from me date of |mission of leaiiied couiisel for Uie paities, ?d ofwith libeiTy to the petitioner to file the respondent No,3 raisiiig aU fiie peti^iou. On such representation bemg made, |sicier aiid decide tlie same witlim a period ofjreceipt of representation. ^_— Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge