1' ‘ 1 I 1. \ ‘ w ‘ i — Basna, Distt. — Mahasamund (C.G.)_ years: Basna, U.D.T. Block — Govt. Basna, Pistt. ‘r. Sec. —’ Mahasaxnuna school, Bhaxlavarpur, (C.G.) I 3. Kim Kumar Sahu S/o Shn Kandarp Sahu Age about 49 School, years, Basna, Asstt. Block? Teacher; Basnaq Govt. Distt. Aadalsh — Mahasamund H17. Sec. 4. (C.G.) Jivrakhan Patel Sfo . ‘ Sfxri i Kati Ram Pate}, agad about§ ; 46 Purani years, Basti, Asstt. Bhanvarpur, Tedcher, Block Govt. ~ Primary Basna,_Distt; School,§ —.— Mahasamund (C.G.) ~ ‘ ‘ r ‘ Harilchhapar, Block ~ Basna Distt. — Mahasa‘mund: (C6,) - 7 , 6. Shobha 47 years, Ram Asstt. Sao S/o Toiacher, gShri Balmukund Govt. ?rin1ary Sac Age School; aboufi‘ Kudekel, mock — Basgna, Distt. — Mamamuw (0.6.); 7. Ramlal Sac ’S/o Sim Dayanidhi Sac), Age about 47 years, Salhejhaxiya, ASstt. Block Téaéher, y— Basna, ' Govt. Distt. Primary ‘— M‘ahasamuxia Schoo’l 8. ‘(C.G,.)* Gangadhax Patel . ‘S/oiVShri . Tulsi V. Ram . Patel, « Age aboxt‘t 50 Kokobhata, years, Asstt Blo Teacher, ‘L‘ Pithora. Govt; Distt- Prunary Mahasamuii§i School 9. Sachchida'nand Age about 4Tyearvsf,’ E Asstt. hiVSV/o Teacher, Shri Balram‘Panigrahi Govt. Primab . ,School, Mahasamund Lpmindan‘gar‘i. (C.G.)s Bock a Pithora, Disat r é I 10.Mink_etau:Das S/o Shri..?umanand Das Age about 45 years, Asstt. Tefaehe‘r, Govt. Maddie School, l3entlxavan, \ Blocke R Pithora, ‘ , , Distt. V Malxa‘samupd i > l1. (C.G.) Smt. Aged Vinay about r Tiwari_W/o 47 years, _ Asstt. ShriVirendra r Teacher; - Kuma‘x Govt. Prixnétry Tiwagri, . ; School, 1’ithora, :Block — , Pithora, ’Distt. , — V 12.Smt. Mahasamund Neera Vanna, (C,G.) Wto t Shri " Jeev ' - Lal Verma g - Age I A about School, '52years, Belsonda,‘ ASstt. Block Teacher, & ‘Distt. GOVt.’ a Girts Mahasamilnd Prirx'i‘ary -(C.G.) ‘1 \ l ,, \ molt COURT OF CHEATHSGARH AT BILASPUR E g WRIT , PETITION 1S) No. 952 of 2008 L PETI'H'ONERS l : 1. Lalit about Kumar 45 years, Dewta ASstt. S/ ’ eacher, Shri Chaturbhuj B.R.C. Basoa,Block Dewta Age \ , 2. Sant Ram Salthi S/o Shri Ramo Sarthi, Age about 47 5.‘ Sadanand Mas'ili S/o Shri Kayato Masih, Aged about; . 5t yeaie, Head Master, Govt. 13rimary School} ' r v ' ' ' l3.Khageshwar Patel 'S/o Shri LaXman Patel, Age about ' ck a r r i The petitioners were appointed on: 28 penod of two years as Ass1stant Teacher on a f1xed pay of Rs 169 L counsel appearmg for the petltxoners subrmts that the issue ¥ involved in the caSe 1s asto whether;gthe petrtroners are entltled to ith effect from the dazte of initial appointment or aneri completion of probation period. i 3 The issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh Statei l WRI’f PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE: CONSTITUTION OF INDIA l SB: Han’ble Sim Satish K. Ag; nmotri. J. a Prsnt. Shn Somkant Venna, Advocate for te peoners Shn U N S Dec Government Advmate for the State/respondents ORAL ORDER % TM (Passed on 14 day of February, 2008) x : K “ l gJune 1983 on probatron for a‘ H w 1 a; } 1 After completion oftheir probation theylwere granted regular pay scal Learned reguiar pay scale w g ‘1 Administraiive Tribunal, Jabalyur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukan‘c Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & Others), wherein it was helfd that the similarly situated teaehers are entitled to regular pay scale with effect horn the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up tio \ I appeal was dismissed by the Hon‘ble l the Hon’ble Supreme Court The Shpreme Court upholding the dec1s1on of the Tribunal to the effect that an 1 ee I ; k § h tm 47 years, Asstt Teach r Govt Primary School, Biikol Block u Saiai ah Distt — Mahasamund (CG) VERSUS t RESI’ONDENTS ‘ State Govt of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Education & Tribal epartment DKS Bhavan, 2. Raipur District (C.G.) Education OK IL icer, Distt. Mahasamund t é (CG) t f 3. ASSistant Cominisswneq Tribal Welfare Department. f t Distt Mahasamund (CG) Vxm k ,m v ,x mu 3 K vxx “xx ¢A W 4 J Mxw te Teachers/Assistant Teachers a1 the date of initial appointment. Learned counsel apearin for the pg ‘e enitled to regular pay scale o t frm Court, whle considering the same i petitioners iimher submits that this Vs. State Govt. ofChhattisarh & another, W.P.(S) No. 813 of2007, b order dated 12.02.2007, has ganteé regular pay scale with effect o th ntmet. e date ofinitial appoin earned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that the case i quarey covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Ra ssue in Ram Kumar Sahu & er Oths g y frm L s sl m Kumar Sahu & Others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & another ( i J l n View of that, this petition is alloyved in the same terms, subct 1 supra). i I je to vifi t kl ' ericaton ofthe facts. No order astoi’ costs. , , q Sd/- . , r Satish K. Agnihotri { 4 t l L ’ %;\% h ‘ i I I t A L . x t s I v