- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.2940 OF 2003 Ms.Smita Mane h/f P.B.Shah for the Petitioner. Mr.Vishwanath Talkute for Respondent. ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. ¦ DATED: 27TH APRIL,2005 P.C.: Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. Perusal of the order passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal shows that the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal has held that merely because there was a mutation entry made in the revenue record showing the Petitioner’s father to be in possession, the Petitioner cannot claim to be a tenant. MRT has observed that the Petitioner has - 2 - not led any oral evidence to establish that his father or he got tenancy rights except the mutation entry. I do not find any patent error of law in the order impugned. Petition is rejected. ...