IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SRI VILAS.V AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO : 15036 of 2007 Between: 1 Shiridi Sree Saibaba Bhakta Samajamu,(Regd.no.810/81) Korutla, Karimnagar District, rep.by its President Gone Vitt 2 Gone Vittal s/o.Sri Pedda Rajam R/o.4-3-201,Gaddakinda, Korutla Post & Mandal Karimnagar district 3 Ambari Satyanarayana S/o.Sri Bhommaiah Shiridi Sree Saibab Bhakta Samajamu 6-3-160,MukramRoad,Korutla karimnagar district 4 Macha Kameswara Murthy S/o.Sri Satyanarayana Murthy Vice President of Shiridi Sree Saibaba Bhakta Samajamu R/o.2-6-273, Santoshi Matha Street,korutla Karimnagar district ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Commissioner of Endowments, Andhra Pradesh Boggulakunta, Hyderabad 2 The Deputy commissioner, Endowments Department Warangal, Warangal District 3 The Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department Karimnagar,Karimnagar District 4 The inspector , Endowments Department, jagityal, Karimnagar district 5 Sri Ch.Anjaneyulu, Executive officer, Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Sircilla, Karimnagar District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the order passed by the 2nd respondent inRc.no.B2/3481/2007 dated 11.7.2007 judicial as illegal,arbitrary, and without jurisdiction and violative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to drop all further proceedings agaisnt the 1st petitioner Shiridi Sree saibaba Bhakta Samajamu,Korutla,forthwith and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : Oral Order: (Per Anil R. Dave, CJ) Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners has submitted that during the pendency of the petition, the parties to the litigation have amicably resolved the disputes and he, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Permission to withdraw the petition is granted. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with no order as to costs. _______________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 11th August, 2008 _______________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J GRR