IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 1ST OCTOBER 2010 / 9TH ASWINA 1932 RP.No. 573 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.32118/2005 Dated 05/03/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): R1 IN THE WPC" --------------------------------------------------------- JAYAKUMAR V.P., MAVARAVILA VEEDU, PALLICHAL, NEMOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.S.AFSAL KHAN SRI.I.ANWAR HUSSAIN RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER AND R2 IN WPC ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PALLICHAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VEDIVACHANKOVIL P.O. BALARAMAPURAM VIA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SASIDHARAN, RESIDING AT RAJ VIHAR, PALLICHAL, NEMOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.L.MOHANAN FOR R1 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ R.P.No.573 OF 2010 IN W.P.(C) NO. 32118 OF 2005 (W) ===================== Dated this the 1st day of October, 2010 O R D E R This Review Petition was filed mainly complaining that as against the submission made at the time of disposal of the writ petition that the building in question was numbered by the Panchayat, the building was numbered only provisionally. When that submission was made, counsel for the 1st respondent sought time to take instructions and has now filed a statement dated 17th of September, 2010, enclosing a copy of the letter from the Secretary of the Pallichal Grama Panchayat. This letter says that the building has been given a permanent number and that tax also has been assessed on that basis. 2. Therefore, the premise on which the review petition is filed is incorrect. Now that the building has been numbered and tax also has been assessed, there is no further grievance to be redressed. Review petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp