IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52598 of 2008 NIRAJ SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.2.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that this petitioner and Bambam Singh have been alleged for shot firing. According to the prosecution case, Bambam’s firing hit Ajit Singh but no injury of firing is found on his person so, it is apparent that the informant was not the eye witness of the occurrence but I find that this petitioner has specifically been alleged for firing shot upon Prakash Mahto and that has not been doubted as about injury. So, petitioner’s allegation cannot be ignored in such circumstances. There is direct and specific allegation, so petitioner deserves no bail. Prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI