IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION (LDG.) NO. 2427 OF 2006 PETITION (LDG.) NO. 2427 OF 2006 PETITION (LDG.) NO. 2427 OF 2006 The B.E.S.T. Officers Association and another. ... Petitioners. V/s. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others. ... Respondents. E.P.Bharucha, senior counsel with S.S.Pakale for the petitioners. K.K.Singhvi, senior counsel with Ms.S.K.Savla for B.M.C. - respondent No.1 P.M.Palshikar i/b. Prem Rnaga for respondent Nos.3 and 5. CORAL: CORAL: CORAL: F.I.REBELLO AND ANOOP MOHTA. JJ. F.I.REBELLO AND ANOOP MOHTA. JJ. F.I.REBELLO AND ANOOP MOHTA. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : : : 17th November 2006. 17th November 2006. 17th November 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : ---- ---- ---- . The challenge in terms of prayer clause (a) no more survives. In the light of that we are not inclined to exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction. 2. So far as other grievance of the petitioner that the alleged appointment is made contrary to the rules, the petitioner may challenge the appointment in another proceeding. 3. With the above observations petition is disposed of. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP MOHTA, J.) MOHTA, J.) MOHTA, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.)