IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 21ST NOVEMBER 2008 / 30TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 34454 of 2008(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- VIJAYAN, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.KOPPAN, MULANGIL VEEDU, KANAYANNUR TALUK, THRIKKAKKARA VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.REJI SRI.B.BIPIN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KALAMASSERY MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, KALAMASSERY MUNICIPALITY. 3. VISWANATHAN, MANGALATHU VEEDU, PUTHALATHU KADAVU ROAD, KANAYANNUR TALUK, THRIKKAKKARA VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI. M.K. ABOOBACKER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 34454 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 21st November, 2008. J U D G M E N T Although the petitioner is challenging Ext. P11 order whereby the 3rd respondent's appeal against the orders directing demolition of his alleged unauthorised construction has been allowed and the Municipality was directed to re-consider the matter, the petitioner would now be satisfied with a direction to the 2nd respondent to pass orders in accordance with Ext. P11 order expeditiously. 2. I have heard the standing counsel for respondents 1 and 2 also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to pass orders in accordance with Ext. P11 order of the Tribunal, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.