1 ABA 398-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.398 OF 2011 Sanjay Suresh Bhalika ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Ms Kranti T. Hiwrale, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.P.P.Shinde, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 3RD MAY, 2011 P.C. . This is an application for anticipatory bail by a person, who apprehends arrest in connection with C.R.No.I-33 of 2011 for the offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Bazar Peth Police Station, Kalyan, District Thane and who is alleged to have cheated the first informant by making him sign papers for taking finance from City Finance Company for purchasing Laptop. The Laptop was taken back 2 ABA 398-2011 but the first informant was slapped with the recovery of Rs.80,000/- from the City Finance Company. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has not cheated the first informant. Yet to show his bona fides, he is ready to deposit a sum of Rs.80,000/- with the JMFC, Kalyan within a period of two weeks. 2. In view of this, applicant's being in custody for the purpose investigation pending the trial may not be necessary. The applicant be released on bail on his furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.25,000/- on the following conditions. (i) The applicant shall report at the Bazar Peth Police Station, Kalyan, District Thane for interrogation on 12th May, 2011 at 11.00 a.m. and thereafter, as and when required by the investigating officer. The applicant shall deposit a sum of Rs.80,000/- with the learned JMFC, Kalyan within a period of two weeks which the learned Magistrate shall invest in interest earning deposit in a Nationalized Bank and deal with it at the end of the trial as per the result of the trial. If the amount is not so deposited, the order 3 ABA 398-2011 shall stand revoked. (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. 3. Criminal Application is disposed of. . The order will remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge sheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court dated 2 nd December, 2010 delivered in Special Leave Petition (Cri.) No.7615 of 2009 (Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State of Maharashtra And Ors.). (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)