IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 301 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Smt. Praveen Kashyap w/o Vinod Kumar, 2. Vinod Kumar s/o Shri Ajmer, Both r/o Village – Anekikalan, P.S. Ranipur, District Haridwar, at present r/o Mohalla Kashipuri, Roorkee, District Haridwar ……………. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Senior Superintendent of Police, Haridwar. 2. Station House Officer, Police Station – Ranipur, District Haridwar. 3. Iqbal s/o Wahid Hassan, r/o Village Aanneki Kalan, P.S. Ranipur, District Haridwar …….. Respondents …….. Sri Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri D. K. Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Sri Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri D. K. Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Sri Sharma, the learned Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners – Smt. Praveen Kashyap and Vinod Kumar seeking quashing of the First Information Report leading to the registration of a case against petitioner no. 2 Vinod Kuamr has now become infructuous as the police after the completion of the investigation did not find any case worth filing charge-sheet against petitioner no. 2 Vinod Kuamr and as such has submitted final report in the case before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 22.03.2006 stands vacated automatically. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 21.07.2006 21.07.2006 A