IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41427 of 2010 DR.DHIRENDRA PRASAD SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU.C.B.I. ----------- 02/ 26th March 2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and perused the order of learned Special Judge,Vigilance-II, Patna whereby prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail in Sikandra P.S Case no. 43/2010 registered under Section-7 of the P.C. Act, 1988 has been rejected. It has been submitted that the SDO should not have filed this case against P.C. Act in violation of a general instruction from the Government contained in letter dated 9th June 2008(Annexure-6). It has further been submitted that the main allegation is against the concerned clerk that he was paying Rs.100/- less in each case to the Aasha Workers and the only allegation against the petitioner is that this was being done on the orders of the petitioner who in In-charge of the Primary Health Centre in question. As to what would be the effect of Annexure-6 on the case and whether that will be applicable in this case 2 or not may be a matter of concern at later stage in the criminal case. On considering the nature of the case and the allegation, this Court is not persuaded to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, the same is rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner for regular bail. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)