IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 30TH MARCH 2010 / 9TH CHAITHRA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 111 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.23581/2004 Dated 20/07/2007 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- P.V.VARGHESE, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O.VARGHESE, RETIRED DRIVER SPECIAL GRADE-I, GENERATION DIVISION, IDAMALAYAR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT C/O.PULLAYIL VIJAYAN, NERIYAMANGALAM.P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) SRI.MATHEW SUNNY RESPONDENT(S): 2ND RESPONDENT ----------------------------- MR.JOHNSON C.PETER KALLADA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), PRESENTLY WORKING AS THE CHIEF ENGINEER (H.R.M.), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV.SRI.ASOK M.CHERIYAN, STANDING COUNSEL, KSEB THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- C.O.(C). NO. 111 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT As per the judgment dated 20.7.07 in W.P.(C).No.23581/04, this Court directed the respondents to take appropriate action to disburse DCRG due to the petitioner, in case, no liability was fixed against him within three years since his retirement. As per the said judgment, time limit was also fixed for complying with the directions. This C.O.C has been filed alleging non-compliance with the aforesaid direction. When the matter came up for admission, the learned standing counsel appearing for K.S.E.B furnished a copy of order dated 10.6.2009. The said order would reveal that an order has been passed by the competent authority. The said order was issued after the period actually fixed by this Court. However, it is evident from the said order that, in terms of the directions thereunder, the claims of the petitioner including DCRG and revision of pensionary claims were sanctioned and authorised for payment. Since the benefits due to the petitioners have already been sanctioned and authorised for payment, the delay in the matter is only to be condoned. Recording the factum of sanctioning and authorisation of the aforesaid benefits, this C.O.C is closed. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc C.O.(C).No.111/2010 2 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. C.O.(C). NO. 111/2010 JUDGMENT 30th March, 2010