CW 8647/09 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** 1-Civil Writ Petition No.8647/2009 Ikrmuddin & (2) Ors Versus State & Anr 2-Civil Writ Petition No.8231/2009 Mamta Sharma Versus State & Anr Date of Order ::: 25/08/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Mukesh Bijrania, & Ms Nisha Sharma, for petitioners Mr.Shantanu Kumawat for Mr. SN Kumawat, AAG, for respondents Both the petitions being based on common facts involving identical controversy are being decided together at joint request by present order. Being eligible for the posts of Teachers (Sanskrit)/General Teachers Gr.III advertised by Rajasthan Public Service Commission Ajmer (“PSC”) vide notification No.1/Exam.”Ga”/Adhyapak/Sanskrit Shiksha/2008- 09/1125/dt.20/06/2008, petitioners submitted their applications. Counsel submits that controversy raised herein has been decided by this Court vide judgment dt.30/11/2009 in CWP-8359/2009 & bunch of others (Naval Kishore Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan) observing ad infra: “Since the grievance raised at the bar is only confined to wrong mention of post Code or failure to do so by petitioners, that itself in no manner can curtail their right to participate CW 8647/09 //2// in competitive examination, 2008 (supra) pursuant to advertisement dt.20/06/08 and that apart, once the petitioners though eigible have been permitted to appear in the competitive examination, 2008, ibid, even under interim orders, their appears to be a reasonable justification that they may know the final fate of their participation. In the light of what has been observed (supra), all these writ petitions are disposed of with the direction to the respondent-PSC to declare result of participation of the writ petitioners who have appeared under interim orders of this Court, by wide publication & circulation including through internet website of respondent-PSC within fifteen days and if placed in the merit list, respondents are directed to consider them for appointment as per order of their respective merit prepared by respondent-PSC in pursuance of advertisement dt.20/06/08. No costs. stand allowed to that extent.” As regards judgments (supra), it has not been disputed by Government Counsel about controversy being decided by this Court. In the light of observations quoted (supra), these petitions stand disposed of. No order as to costs. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p.2/ 8647CW2009Aug25Snskrt-Code(2).doc