•. '" £ :t !i',.. v^/ A^ v'^ssW,^ ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PBTITIOM (2271 No. 3914/2011 Petltioner Defendant PLaiatiffs, Respondents PlaiaUffe VERSVS 1. 2. Mauohar Lal Trivedi, aged about 50 (54) years, son of Late Babulal Trivedi, R/o Kharwarbada (Budhapar^ Tafasil & Distt. Raipur (C.G.). Shri Sudhir Agrawal (Advocate), aged about 45 (50) years, son of ShriS.K. Agrawal (Advocate), Subodh Kumar Agrawal, aged about 41 (45) years, son ofShri S.K. Agrawal (Advocate). Bofh are resMent of Tutihatri, Purani Basti, Raipur, Tahsfl & Distnct Raipur (CG). WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THB CONSTITUTION; ^* INDIA. (8B :Hon'bIe Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Preaent:- Mr. A. N. Bhakta, Advocate for the petitioner. Respondents not noticed; ORAL- ORDER (Passedoa 21/07/2011} By this petition under Artk;le 227 of the Constitution of India petitioncr has challenged the legaUty and propriely of fhe orders dated 6/7/2011 & 4/10/2010 passed by 6*h Civil Judge, Class-I, Raipur iu Civil Suit No. 57- B/2008. After sonae argument, leamed couusel for the petitioner subinits that he seeks to withdraw fhis petition with liberty to file application under Order 1 Rute 10 ofthe CivU Procedure Code for uapleacUng tiscgar N^am as necessaiy party. Prayer aUowed. Consequentfy, petition is disniissed as wifhdiawn with aforesaid Uberty. I.A. No. 01 is also disinissed. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge