~\ IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTTS6ARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S)NO. fci'O^y /2010 Petitioner S^!:.^-" l.AsA-"" Versus Respondents 'Ku. Pushpa now Smt. Pushp W/o Shri Loman Kumar ,^.u^ about 31 years Shiksha II now regular teacher Middle School, Village - Balod, Distt.C>urg-(C.6.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. /' (C.6.) 2. The Secretary, Panchayat D.K.S. ^Bhawan, Sachivaiaya, Raipur-(C.G.) 3. Distt. Education Officer, Bemetra, / Distt. Durg-(C.&.) 4. Chief Executive Officer, Bemetra, Distt. Durg-(C.6.) WRIT PETCTION UNbER ARTCCLES 226 OF THE CONSTCTUHQN OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT/WRITS, ORDER/ORDERS. DIRECnON/DIRECTIONS, ETC. HIOHCCniRTGFGHHATnSCtAIUlA-EBILASPUR r?ii»iff ei.mT .laTeflpT/^c* i»t>vJTrtT»riiFipti»ni'¥X?Aiyipio • JIK/W €»&*&onjnA uvoai^.fCt j", ;.^-*<fe- lh-*..l<<iig. B...l.l.i. W.P.(S( N0.6699 ^2010 Ku. Prishpa UQW Snit. Pushpa Viersus RESPONDEWtS State ofG.Cr. 6s Ofhcrs WRIT PBTITION UNDiBR ASTICLE; 226 OF THE CONSTITDTION Shri Sautosti Yadu, counsel fcr the petitioner. Siui Suinesli Bajaj,, G.A. S)r,tBe.Sfate, " ^OKDSER.-'1.'.^' ; ;, '-,-: ; ^ :.-.:• -(22.ri.201Q)'::::.::'1.:'..; . ': ::- Grievance of fhe pefitioner ui^ttus petitkin is ihat iEtitiaUy sKe was appointed as Contract Teacher Grrade II and thereafter as Shiksha Karnu Gradc n Ibut^stafeswa&^nst'being peruu^ for.fhe post^pfifHea<^;i%as^%nIit]^i^iCTi^^ :ex@erieriGe'®f;SGveffiiyears^^SiB^sl|a^ISaEiB^ , ; , ; : •; , • '%?"^!'WGoiiaSel;'SIbr :;lfhe .respOBdelftsjtState^.'s^ ^overnment has taten a defiision tp permitan t^ who have the expeiience of seven years eifheron the post ofGontract Teacheror on the post of Shiksha Karmiand fherefore, ihere reinaias nofhiag in fhe preseat petition. He has shqwa the letter dated 19.11.2010 issued by the DiiEctor, Putefic Instruc-tioiis, Raipur addressed to fhe Advocafe ©eneral.Coiay of the saM fettjer has been given to Shri Satiu also aad Ke is sajisfied'with the same. Counsel fbr fhe petitioner subinits fhat the exaiiHQatiori for ffae post bf head master is scheduled fbr 28.1t.2010 &-29.11.2010 aud as fhe petitioner is appFehcndiiig that she inay not be pfci^^ to appear lia fhe'same, a du-ection inay (be issaed ,to ftie •eoiripetent^auf^ pernuthertQappear'iitthesaidexainitiation. '- j ' a in2=S^i»t!^@!Fi^r1a'R'FT^'-i'TMa3i-iii'r;li'''.:i^j^ ';I'""''""^''i;'a'i!'']!te':!!8&'flStfeft' 3. State counsel submits tbat fhe appTeyension ofthe pefitioner is preinature aad if she bas diriy fiUed in the appUcatioiL fonn, fhe aufhoritv conceraed would actpursuant t6 the deeision taken by the State Goveniment vide tetterdated 19.11.2010. . : - 4. InthefactsaiidcirciUBstaxices'oFtfafieas^^^ ia fhe petitiDn, it is disposed ofwiffi'a dicection^_to the coinpetent authoiity to pennit the petitioner to appear in-tliesxamiaation tn be t ld on 28.11.2010 & 29.11.2010 ibrtBepostofHead^^^^^M^ pursuant to the decisipn taken by thc^State <}oveiTunent sutyect t6 fhe verificatton of tfae fact fhat the petitioner Aas fiUed te aud fhe same has been duly accepted by the-aiifhority concemed. If the gneyaaee of tlie Retttioaer stiU suivives, sfae would be at liberty lio appi'oach fhis Gourt.^ ' ? J • , ?^_——- :'.w^—.^^^..1,.^ sd/- '.•.::..;:'':r:.^';I^:?^;;§:%^ Judge iu'^sa ^::':.t w^3i?S