IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10494 of 2008 Ravindra Kumar son of Sri Ganesh Prasad Yadav, R/o Mohalla D. V.C.Road Yarpur ( Saket Bhawan), P.S. Gardanibagh, Dist. Patna-1. ---- Petitioner Versus 1. State of Bihar 2. Dharam Nath Singh son of Praduman Singh Public Relation Inspector, Department, G.P.O. Patna, R/O of vill. Puran Tand, P.O. Pratap Tand, P.S. Lalganj, Dist. Vaishali at present residing Qr. No. 230 Type-II, P.T.Colony, Kidwaipuri, Patna-800001. ---- Opp.Parties. For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiva Ranjan, Advocate. For the State :Mr. Pushpa Sinha, APP. ----------- 03 05.07.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner is aggrieved by order taking cognizance dated 08.01.2008, whereby cognizance under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Section 420 of the Penal Code has been taken. As per allegation, the petitioner is said to have impersonated as Amit Kumar and thereby withdrew illegally a sum of Rs. 30,000/-. It is contended that on the same day he deposited the said amount in the account bearing no. 307759 (Annexure-2). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the statement of the holder of the said account has not been recorded by the police. At the stage of taking cognizance the Court is not required to go into that aspect of matter. Learned Court below, on perusal of the materials available on record, has taken a view that there is prima facie case against the petitioner. Accordingly, cognizance has been taken. 2 This Court is not inclined to interfere with the order impugned. It shall be open to the petitioner to raise all these issues at the time of trial by adducing appropriate evidence. The application is, accordingly, disposed of. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)