^fr ^ '''r \\ 1 ^.A \-^/./ ^^ H1GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIViSION BENCH Coram : HON^BLE SHRI RAJEEV ©UPTA,CJ. & HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS IVi.G.C.No.26of2007 M/s. Shree Nakoda (spat Ltd., Near railway crossing JVIowa,' Raipur - 492007, Through Manager, Shri Rajendra Tiwari, S/o Shri B.N. Tiwari, Aged about 32 years, Ralpur (C.G.) Versus 1. Union of india, Through Secretary, Ministry of Railways, New Delhi. 2. General Manager, S.E.C. Raitway, Headquarters Office, Bslaspur (C.G.) 3. The Chief Commercial Manager, S.E.C. Railway, Bilaspur (CG) 4. The Sr. DivisionaS Commerdal Manager,, S.E.C. Railway, Distrtet- Bilaspur 5. Goods Clerk/Station Master, Uslapur, Dlst- BISaspur (C.G.) APPLICATfON FOR IVIODIFICATSON OF ORDER DATED 07.02.2006 AND RESTORATiO OF WRIT PETITSON N0.840/2008 Present: Shri H.8. Ahluwaiia, learned counsel for the petitioner. ORDER (23rd0ctober,2008) The foilowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: .,,,^ - ^^"""^ |%a|| '^\ ^: ./ ••/./ y /-f Shri H.S. Ahluwalia, learned counsef for the petitioners is heard on M.(C).P. No.74/2007, a petition for condonation of the deiay in filing the review / restoration petition. 2. On due consideration, we are satisfled that the petjtioner has succeeded in showing sufficient cause for the delay in fiiing the review / restoration petition. 3. M.(C). P. No.74/2007, therefore, is allowed and the delay in flling the review / restoration petitjon is herebycondoned. 4. Shri H.S. Ahluwalia, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the review petition with liberty of challengjng the order dated 07.02.2006 passed in W.P. No.640/2006, review whereof is sought, in this petition, before an appropriate forum. 5. Permission granted. 6. With the above liberty, the review / restoration petition is dismissed as withdrawn. —~" Sd/- aiiefJustice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge padma