(1) wp7503-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7503 OF 2011 Sandeep Prakashrao Sabne PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. P.S. Dighe, advocate holding for Mr. V.R. Dhorde, advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. Mr. A.A. Nimbalkar, advocate holding for Mr. V.D. Salunke, advocate for Respondent No. 3 and 4. ..... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 9th DECEMBER, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally, by consent. 2. The learned counsel, appearing for Respondent No.3, undertakes to submit the pay-bills of the petitioner to the Respondent No. 2 for the period from the date on which the petitioner was reinstated in pursuance to the orders passed in the Letters Patent Appeal. 3. As is evident from the document, which is (2) wp7503-11 annexed at page 27 of the present petition, since the services of the petitioner as Shikshan Sevak were approved by the Respondent No. 2 - Education Officer, the Respondent No. 2 shall sanction the pay-bills and pay the salary to the petitioner as admissible to the Shikshan Sevak. 4. Needless to state that the aforesaid arrangement shall be subject to the final outcome of the Letters Patent Appeal which is pending before this Court. In that view of the matter, Rule is made absolute in above terms. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] npj/wp7503-11