CWP No.3297 of 2010.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.3297 of 2010 Date of Decision: 24.02.2010 **** Paramjit Kaur and others . . . . Petitioners VS. State of Punjab and others . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. B.S. Chahal, DAG Punjab ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). Notice of motion. Mr. B.S. Chahal, learned DAG Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. (2). Having regard to the nature of the order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to call upon the respondents to file any counter-reply at this stage. (3). The petitioners are working as Guest Faculty Lecturers with respondents No.3, 4 & 5. They seek a direction that they be not relieved from CWP No.3297 of 2010.doc - 2 – their respective posts to adjust other set of Guest Faculty Lecturers in their place. (4). Mr. B.S. Chahal, learned DAG Punjab, states that as a matter of Policy and subject to the petitioners’ eligibility and availability of work, the Guest Faculty Lecturers like the petitioners are not being replaced by another set of Guest Faculty Lecturers. (5). Ordered accordingly. (6). Dasti . (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 24.02.2010 vishal shonkar