IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 3RD MAY 2011 / 13TH VAISAKHA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 3178 of 2011() --------------------------------------- C.R. NO.08/2011 OF PARALI EXCISE RANGE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT CMP.1343/2011 of J.M.F.C.-II,PALAKKAD .................... APPLICANT/ACCUSED. ---------------------------------- KAMALAM, AGED 56 YEARS, W/O. GOPALAKRISHNAN, MANIKANDA NIVAS, MUNDOOR P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU, SENIOR ADVOCATE BY ADVS. SRI.M.REVIKRISHNAN SRI.VIPIN NARAYAN RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT. ------------------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTING THE RANGE OFFICER, PARALI EXCISE RANGE. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss V. RAMKUMAR, J. ----------------------------------------------- Bail Appln.No.3178 of 2011 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 3rd day of May, 2011 ORDER In this Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the sole accused in C.R.No.08 of 2011 of Parali Excise Range, Palakkad, for offences punishable under Sections 55(a) & (i) of the Abkari Act, seeks her enlargement on bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending inter alia that the petitioner is involved in eight other Abkari crimes. 3. It is too early to accept the petitioner's contention that she has been falsely implicated in the case. Moreover, I am not satisfied that both the grounds enumerated under Section 41A (b)(ii) of the Abkari Act are present in this case so as to justify her release on bail. With the above observation this Application is dismissed. Dated this the 3rd day of May, 2011. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. skj