IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FIRST APPEAL No.288 of 1985 ====================================================== STATE ... ... Appellant Versus NR.LAL THANGAL ... ... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : Mr. B.K.Singh Chauhan, Adv. For the Respondent : None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 34 22-01-2020 Learned counsel for the appellant-State is present. Prayer for four weeks has been made on behalf of the appellant for arranging the records. From perusal of the records of this appeal, it transpires that a cross-appeal had been filed in this appeal on behalf of the respondent, namely, Narayan Lal Thangal and pursuant to the order dated 18.12.2017, the same has been placed for hearing. No one appears on behalf of the respondent to pursue the cross-appeal. It further transpires from the office note dated 02.01.2018 that this memo of appeal stood rejected for non- compliance of the preemptory order dated 05.07.1991. In view of the above, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he will be taking steps for restoration of this appeal. As the appeal itself stands dismissed for non- Patna High Court FA No.288 of 1985(34) dt.22-01-2020 2/2 compliance of the preemptory order dated 05.07.1991, no further order needs to be passed. sushma/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U