S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2498/2009 Y.D. Industries and Anr. Vs. Food Corporation of India and Ors. Date of order : 24.03.2009 HON'BLE MR.GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS,J. Dr. P.S. Bhati, for the petitioners. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that technical bid of the petitioners was not opened irrespective of the fact that they have made repeated prayer to the respondents. Further it is stated that without considering the petitioners' case properly, the technical bid of other persons was opened. It is also submitted that two types of forms were issued by the respondent Corporation and different informations were sought from the contractors. As per petitioners, they are repeatedly making submissions to the Corporation to supply reasons for not opening their tender for technical bid, I am not satisfied to interfere without any specific pleadings. Therefore, for redressal of their grievance, the petitioners may file a representation to the respondent Corporation, which is not filed by them before filing this petition to seek mandamus and straightway, this writ petition has been filed. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioners to file a representation before the respondent Corporation and raise their all grievances for supplying the reasons for not opening their tender for technical bid. Upon filing the said representation within a period of three days from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, it is expected from the respondent Corporation that they will decide the representation of the petitioners within a period of one week from the date of filing representation while giving reasons upon the grounds taken by the petitioners in their representation. It is made clear that in the event of rejection of the petitioners' representation, it is always open for the petitioners to seek remedy available under the law. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS)J. Rm/