IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 736 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO. 736 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO. 736 OF 2005 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L) NO. 860 OF 2004 (L) NO. 860 OF 2004 (L) NO. 860 OF 2004 IN IN IN NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 118 OF 2003 OF MOTION NO. 118 OF 2003 OF MOTION NO. 118 OF 2003 IN IN IN INSOLVENCY INSOLVENCY INSOLVENCY PETITION NO. 53 OF 1998 PETITION NO. 53 OF 1998 PETITION NO. 53 OF 1998 1a. Mrs. Rajrani Chimanlal Rawal & ors.] .. Appellants Versus M/s. Sterling Finance Corpn. (regd.) ] .. Respondents Mr. H.N. Thakore i/b M/s. Thakore Jariwala & Associates for the appellants. Mr. A.H. Delhiwala for the respondents. Mr. A.P. Kothari, Deputy Official Liquidator present. CORAM: R.M. LODHA & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 02ND MARCH, 2006 P.C. : . For the reasons stated in the Affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, we are satisfied that the delay is sufficiently explained. The respondent has not traversed the facts stated in the Notice of Motion. 2. We accordingly condone the delay in filing the Appeal. : 2 : 3. Office is directed to process the Appeal and post it for admission. 4. Notice of Motion disposed of. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]