1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CAO NO. 440/2009 IN MCA ST. NO.19200/2008 IN CEL NO. 36 OF 2004 (Commissioner of Central Excise vs. M/s. Lloyds Metals & Engg. Limited & Anr.) AND CAO NO.441/2009 IN MCA (Review) ST. NO.19198/2008 IN CEL NO.35/2004 (Commissioner of Central Excise vs. M/s. Lloyds Metals & Engg. Limited & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & F.M. REIS, JJ. 09.09.2009. Heard Shri Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant/ appellant. The prayer is to condone delay of one year and 144 days in filing MCA for review. The reason disclosed by the department is administrative compliances. The application is being strongly opposed by Shri Motghare, learned counsel for respondent No.1, who states that there are no cogent reasons for condoning such delay. However, there is no reply denying the facts disclosed in para 2 of the application. Hence, in the interest of justice, we condone the delay. Office to register MCA and place it for further consideration on 29th September 2009. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.