MK GH COURT OF CIIHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION gS) No. 5005 of2008 Angad Pradhan S/o Shri Halmlar Pradhan Aged about 38 yeaxs, Occupation Ex—Shiksha Karmi (Guruji) Resident of Dhodarkasa, Block : Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.) u PETITIONERS Chhir Sagar @ Khir Ssagar Sao S/o Vikram Sac Ex-Shiksha Kamn' (Gumji) Aged aobut 30 years, R/o Village Jamjuda, Block Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary Department of Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) . The Janpa’d Panchayat Pithora Threugh Its Chief Executive Officer: Block & Tahsil Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.) ‘ ' " ‘ y.- RES?ONDENTS . The Collector cum Chairman (Education Guamntee Scheme) Mahasamund Tahsil and District Mahasamund (C.G.) UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WRIT rETmON ‘ SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Aw‘ 0g} J. Shri Abhay K. Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. i ' v Shri M.P.S.Bl1atia, Deputy Government Advocate fer the V} State/respondents 1 and 3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 10W day of September, 2008) l. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners restricts his prayer that the representation dated 22.08.2008 (Annexure P19) pending before the authorities be considered in accordance with law. The petitioner has further referred about the order dated 7.5.2008 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 6127 of 1998 (Mohit Ram Patel and others v. State of M.P. & Others). Since the matter is already under consideration in the light of the order dated 07.05.2008 (Annexure P/l) passed by this Court in W.P.No. 6127/1998: no further order is necessary. . It is expedient that the officers concerned shall consider the representations as stated above in accordance with law on its own merit in terms of the order passed in W.P.No. 6127/1998. 3. In view ofthe above: the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- iSatish K. Agnihotri Judge ‘»