HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W WRI’YPETI'I‘IONgS} No. 277 01’2008 Ramesh Singh Kanwar, S/o Late Shri ManE( Lal Kanwar, Upper Division Teacher, Govermnent Girls Higher Secondary School, Kota, Block — Kora, Dism’ct * Bilaspur (06.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Thev Sscretary, Education Depamnent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Directer, Public Instructim Departmem, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Oi§cer Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Biock ~ Kata, Dim. ¢ Biiaspur (CG) UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUITON OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble smi Satish K. Awgotg: J. ' Present: Shri K.S.Pawar, Advocate for tho petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Government Advocate for the State/ Respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on Mmdayof January, 2008) 1. Leamed counse1 appealing for the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merit at this stage. However, learned counsel prays that the respondent authorities be directed to consider his representation dated 24.10.2007 (Annexare PM), expeditiously, in accordance with law, to which learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State has no objection. 2. In view ofthe foregoing, the petition is disgosed ofwith a direction to .z the respondent-authorities to consider and decide the representation as stated above, expeditiously, as far as possible: preferably within a period of four weeks from the date ofreeeipt ofa copy ofthis order. ’ sw— Satish K. Agnihntri Judge 1! {l RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION PETITIONER