IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1534 of 2007 RAMAKANT YADAV & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 10.11.2008. This revision has been preferred against the order dated 4th August,2007 passed by Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Darbhanga in Cr. Appeal No.9 of 1999 thereunder the learned Additional Sessions Judge has confirmed the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 19.12.1998 passed by Sri Ravindra Nath Tripathy, Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in Trial No.28 of 1998. The learned Magistrate has convicted the appellants only under section 504 I.P.C. and released them under section 3 of Probation of Offenders Act after due admonition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the court below has not properly appreciated the oral evidence adduced on behalf of the prosection and has wrongly convicted the appellants. However, on perusal of the judgment - 2 - N.H./ of both the courts, it appears that in course of the trial four witnesses supported the prosecution story upon which the learned Magistrate convicted the petitioners. I find no legal ground for interference in the impugned judgment. The court below has rightly recorded the order of conviction against the petitioners. Accordingly, this application is dismissed at the admission stage. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )