In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R. F. A No. 1725 of 2002 (O&M) Union Territory Chandigarh ..... Appellant vs Sohan Singh and another ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: None for the appellant. Mr. P. C. Dhiman, Advocate, for the respondents. Rajesh Bindal J. The Union Territory, Chandigarh is in appeal before this court against the award of the learned court below passed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') seeking reduction in compensation for the superstructures, the fruit and non-fruit bearing trees standing on the acquired land. Briefly, the facts of the case are that Union Territory, Chandigarh vide notification dated 20.8.1998 issued under Section 4 of the Act, acquired land forming part of the revenue estate of villages Nizampur Burail, Nizampur Kumbra, Kajheri and Jhumroo for development of third phase of Chandigarh. The Land Acquisition Collector assessed the value of the superstructures, fruit and non-fruit bearing trees existing on the acquired land. The land owners feeling dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Collector, filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below assessed the value of the superstructures, the fruit and non-fruit bearing trees standing on the acquired land. Aggrieved against the award of the learned court below, the appellant is before this court. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the claim made by the appellant in the present appeal is squarely covered by judgment of this court in RFA No. 3921 of 2007 – Arunash Chander Kaushik and others vs Union Territory, Chandigarh . , decided on 10.2.2009. Since no one has appeared for the appellant, the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. 29.1.2010 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge