IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.292 of 1998 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Secretary, Department of Science & Technology, Government of Bihar 3. The Joint Director, Administration, Department of Science & Technology, Government of Bihar 4. The Assistant Director, Department of Science & Technology, Government of Bihar 5. The Additional Secretary cum Director, Department of Science & Technology, Government of Bihar, Patna 6. The Principal, Government Polytechnic Saharsa Respondents- Petitioners Versus Brajendra Thakur son of Sri Panna Lal Thakur resident of Mohalla Bidyapati Nagar Ward no. 20 in the town of Saharsa East P.S. and Dist. Saharsa Petitioner- Opposite party ----------- For the petitioners: Mr S.S.Mishra, AC to GA no.V For the Opposite party: None ------------------ 09 07.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. This petition has been filed for review of the order of this court dated 24.08.1998 by which a Bench of this Court set aside the impugned order contained in Annexure 2 to the writ petition and disposed of CWJC no.4767 of 1997 directing the respondents (Review petitioners) to give same treatment to the petitioners which was given to the petitioner of CWJC no. 3122 of 1992 as per its order dated 03.11.1992 without any further delay. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that CWJC no. 3122 of 1992 was decided on 03.11.1992 whereas the instant CWJC no.4767 of 1997 was filed much later and was decided on 24.08.1998 and in between another Bench of this Court had passed order dated 04.07.1997 in CWJC no.3017 of 1994 and CWJC no.5123 of 1994 whereby the writ court refrained from interfering with the order passed - 2 - by the authorities cancelling the appointment of those writ petitioners. He further submits that the said orders of learned Single Judge of this Court were affirmed by a Division Bench of this Court vide its order dated 05.12.2000 passed in LPA no. 931 of 1997 and LPA no. 995 of 1997. Hence he submits that there was no occasion for the court in the instant matter to pass order dated 24.08.1998 in CWJC no.4767 of 1997. After considering the averments made by learned counsel for the petitioners and after perusing the materials on records, it transpires that the Single Bench of this Court while deciding CWJC no. 3107 of 1994 and CWJC no. 5123 of 1994 and the Division Bench of this Court while deciding LPA no. 931 of 1997 and LPA no. 995 of 1997 had specifically found that the appointments of the petitioners of the said two cases were irregular and hence no relief could be given to the appellants but in the instant case from a perusal of the impugned order dated 24.08.1998 passed in CWJC no.4767 of 1997 no such finding is there and the said writ petition was exactly similar to CWJC no. 3122 of 1992. Hence the petitioners of this case rightly deserve the same treatment as was given to the petitioner of CWJC no. 3122 of 1992. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court does not find any illegality in the order sought to be reviewed nor does it find any error apparent on the face of record or any new material which could compel this Court to take a different view. In the said circumstances, this Civil Review petition is dismissed. shahid (S.N.Hussain, J)