IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26097 of 2010 1.RADHA DEVI, WIFE OF ANIL KUMAR 2.ANIL KUMAR, SON OF MOHAN LAL 3.PRATIK ARYAN @ TICHU, SON OF ANIL KUMAR 4.VIKRAM KUMAR, SON OF BANDE BARNAWAL 5.MALA DEVI, WIFE OF VIKRAM KUMAR ALL RESIDENTS OF KOTWALI CHAUK GALI NO. 1, POLICE STATION BETTIAH TOWN, DISTRICT BETTIAH. .........PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ......OPPOSITE PARTY WITH Cr.Misc. No.26169 of 2010 1.SANDHYA KUMARI @ SANDHYA DEVI, WIFE OF MANOHAR PRASAD 2.MANOHAR PRASAD, SON OF LATE SARYUG PRASAD, BOTH RESIDENTS OF FLAT NO. 402, KRISHNA APARTMENT, PEE PEE COMPOUND, MAIN ROAD, RANCHI, POLICE STATION HINDPIRHI, DISTRICT RANCHI, JHARKHAND .......PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ......OPPOSITE PARTY FOR THE PETITIONERS : MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR THE INFORMANT : MR. ARBIND KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR THE STATE : MR. M.DAYAL, A.P.P. 02/- 30.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the two petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 26169/2010 and five petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 26097/2010, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel representing the informant. All the seven petitioners are named accused in the case being in-laws of the informant, who was married with one Pawan Kumar on 26.5.2003 and the husband is in custody. There are averments as regard to allege torture for - 2 - demand of dowry etc. against all the petitioners. So far, the two petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 26169/2010, is concerned, they as alleged slapped and assaulted her in the year 2003 at Ranchi, where the informant had gone of there call with her husband. The main grievance appears against the husband with whom the relation of informant appears not good. With respect to another case there is almost similar allegation, but of the year 2008. The case has been instituted on the written application of the informant dated 27.3.2010. No doubt, from the order of learned Sessions Judge, it appears that none of the petitioners were ready to participate in negotiation with the informant on the ground that it is the matter between her and her husband. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks of receipt of the copy of this order, petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 26169/2010, namely, 1.Sandhya Kumari @ Sandhya Devi and 2.Manohar Prasad and petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 26097/2010, namely 1.Radha Devi, 2.Anil Kumar, 3.Pratik Aryan @ Tichu, 4.Vikram Kumar and 5.Mala Devi, are directed to be released on bail - 3 - on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawadah in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 34 of 2010, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, the liberty shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)