IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36605 of 2010 1. MAHENDRA YADAV @ MAHENDRA PRASAD YADAV 2. Pramila Devi Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 28.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased equally alleged for demand of dowry followed by torture soon before the death within 7 years of the marriage in matrimonial house. Vague allegations of demand and torture along with remaining separate from sons including husband is the defence. For the separation, Annexure-3 is there on record appears a creation prima facie makes the allegation more serious otherwise material available in the case is found sufficient for refusal of anticipatory bail to brother-in-law vide Cr. Misc. No. 41872 of 2010. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)