HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAiW: BIL^PUR WritPeUtion (Sl No. 304S of M<» Petitioner Respondents 1) 2) 3) Vijay Kumar Ram, S/o. Shri Butai Ram, aged afaout 39 y^irs, service, Driver (Road Rolter), Border Road O^anization, 342 Spl (Surfacing platoon), 108 road Construction Company, Camp Karaly Tahsi! Dantewada, District Oantgwada (CG) at present transferred to 305 Spl. 84 Rcad Construction Company (-P) Sewak, Demapur; Versus The Director General, Border Road Organizafion, Border Road Bhawan; Ring Roacf, Delhi,, Cont, New Delhi. The Chief Engineer Project, Hirak Border Rogri Organisation, Darshan Colony, Near K.D. Coilege, Nagpur -09 (Maharastra). The Offlcer Commanding, 108 Construction Company (GREE) B.R.O. Camp- Karaiy, Tahsil Dantewada Distriot Dantewada (CG); <. (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnlhotri, 4. Present: Shri Manoj Mishra, counset for the petitioner. Shri R.S. Bhaghel, counsel fbr the respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on ztf^ day afJune 2008) With consent of both the parties, the matter is heard finally. 2) Learned counset appearing for the petitioner sutynits friat the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merit at this staQe. Hcwever, the fn respondent No.3 be'directed to consider his representation dated 15-3-2008 (Annexure -P/2) pending before hlm 3) T-eamed counsel appearing for the responderts fairiy submits that there is no reason as to why the representation filed by the petitioner shoutd nat be considered, in accorclance with taw, on its own merit. 4) In view of the above submission made by leamed counsei appearirg fbr the respondents, it is directed that the respondent No.3 shali consider the K.-su 2-- representation dated 15-3-2008 (Annexurs P/2), in aocordanoe 'with law, on its own merit and decide the same as early as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks. 5) In view of foregoing, the petition is disposed of with above-stated direction. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge