IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 8TH OCTOBER 2009 / 16TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 28294 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- V.M.JOSEPH, S/O.MAMMEN, VALAMPARAMBIL, MUTTAR PO. ALAPPUZHA DIST. BY ADV. SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE MUTTAR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.4048, MUTTAR P.O., ALAPPUZHA DIST, REP. BY THE SECRETARY. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), ALAPPUZHA. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO CO-OPERATIVE DEPT., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. G. P. SHRI.SANTHOSH KUMAR. K.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.28294 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 8th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is the President of the 1st respondent society. The 1st respondent convened the Annual General Body Meeting of the members of the society on 26.9.2009 for discussing various issues. In that meeting some members became unruly objecting to the removal of some photographs of erstwhile employees of the society from the walls of the office of the society. According to the petitioner, because of the trouble which became uncontrollable, the petitioner had no option but to dissolve the general body meeting. Accordingly, he dissolved the meeting and left the hall. On 28.9.2009, the petitioner was informed by the Secretary of the 1st respondent that after the petitioner left the hall, some members of the unruly members detained some other members of the managing committee and forced them to adopt a resolution removing the petitioner from the membership of the managing committee. According to the petitioner, such action is totally against the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act and Rules. Therefore, challenging such resolution the petitioners filed Exts.P5 and P6 before the 3rd respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to consider and pass orders on Exts.P5 and P6 expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. In the 2 nature of the order I propose to pass, I do not think it necessary to issue notice to the 1st respondent. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P5 and P6 expeditiously. Orders on Ext.P6 stay petition shall be passed within one week from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the judgment. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge