THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.30128 of 2010 Date:28.02.2011 Between: Patta Krishna Reddy and others ..... Petitioners AND The Sub-Registrar, B.Kothakota, Chittoor and others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Ch.Sreenivas Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2: -- Counsel for Respondent No.3: Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments Counsel for Respondent No.4: Sri V.T.M. Prasad, standing counsel for endowments The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in passing the proceedings vide Rc.No.37/2009 dt.10.11.2009 directing the Respondent No.3 to cancel the sale deed document bearing No.1682 dated 10.09.2009, without causing notice to the petitioners, as illegal, void, against the principles of natural justice, being contrary to the provisions of Article 14, 19 and 300 A of the Constitution of India and direct the 1st respondent not to cancel the registered sale deed bearing No.1682 dated 10.09.2009, without following well laid principles of Registration Act and pass such other order or orders…” At the hearing, Sri Ch. Sreenivas, the learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that in view of the subsequent events, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, interim order dated 03.12.2010 in W.P.M.P.No.38377 of 2010 is vacated and W.P.M.P.No.38377 of 2010 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 28th February, 2011 GHN