• K SK iii-t|i-:-;k^ \v:^ ;;^- UiSl* iSBW K». B1:1 M ^W . a^iB BBB BB ^^^i VffS. iBffi' E|gi^S||^1|ii|aMBili81%MiliRj^l!l! Wl^M: i''i:^'©'£))3IB^EIl^8ffie<"iMe§ittsi3!|QeJ-^:':;;:;':''' ,; ^l '|01|Oi;^gj|||lJ|||l0^3gU!(],^;;^ '^^. - rf^-a,,; :i,p;^?^*g;sw>?jK^w''.' : • • 1 n^Q''^^ - WsWMa .. ' B|i€lujBA]ae^.N!|Ocj|j|3|aapii8}UU8cin3:. :• :li:l'-i:' ;i:.^^p('@?9MjRH eAe|ej}UBt^,,yeMjatJQ('g'y;a 'l.iodStie.iSii.iauoissStEjtypo' '^'SWndiBy. ^KsssswewsWies^s'^Q' . • ^S3!|6(^3a^(.j^.iej§.io@g|<6n(Mt|i i ^"iljESsBByio-yys^s 'v'-: ^ .•'..'" ". ':;•• :.•: • .:,/..'..'.. ••.: • .••'•'•• ^,::'-y....-^:-sflsaa^ •'--^-•'l.i-^i'''.'^ ^. AuQioa: .iet)!/t BUBAAV }o S,|§p(5e|%&ie§^ gfr}n()q^p96^'uBMij.:p8SMdJB/i/tt)S9u»ni.|&. - !.iti[g9}e-[ o^ 'uettij. ResB.iy^ByBEs'^ ('s'3!:''dlea ;/"€^^ .••'\ ^y D3N011113d 800^ ^^ ;(S)uo^ J8iV©md?PH%3yfl.l.VS!EITO3lOtfynG3,M19U-lSIN.l.NI i-3 ^ •••f~^. fflGH CQURT OFCHHAmSGARHAT BILASFUR WRTT PETmON CS) No. 6218 of2008 PETmQNER : GangaPrasadTiwari. VERSUS!.; .::.',... • ,~: ; :: 1. RESPONDENTS : StateafCUiattisgailifeOthers. WRITPETmONUNDERAKIICKE 226/227 C®3 .C©NSTTrUT[QNOF INDIA 8B: Hnn'Ue Slu-i SatistiJE.jitBnfliotn.J. Present: Sfari PrakashTiwari.AdvocatewitbSim V, Vyay, Advocate ^fbrthe^pefitioner. .; .; /:•' : ' ••• i.'.l1. :.. •: . ::;. 1 Shri V.y.S^oorthy, Deputy Advoca.te^jBetieral with SIiri N.N.Roy; Panel LawyerfCTttieStateMspDnde^ ORDERffiUtAEIi ,:^, . .;• •: 1,;. (Passed.0u;23"'.<3%||tlMgn.l,J2filO): ; ./^ ; ',.,.'.: 1. I^aniedc<whselappearing^tlieipititiQnet"S^^ have been initiated against ^..petitioner fw the same set^^^o^^ charges by th®Ti^nsport^ ©eipartment^as WBU as by the Eoliiee Bepartment..:::,,. ; :1 : ' ':i''\[:'.. • ::' : :'':' The petitioner, |being Constable ffitlie ^olice Department, was senf deputation tQ^dle Transport DeBaFtment on 04^08.2QQ5 ari(i; eonfaffiefl till 22.08.2007^ Whenlhepetfficmerwasvrorkingm the Transg9rt Department (»!deputation, a ^paTtmeHtal enquiiy was mitiat^d and later Qp, the Police Departmerit,Aemg^the gareiit departmeHt, ajlso imtiatedadepartmentalenquiiyagamstf^petition^^ charges. Thus, the petttioner t&:ficmgtwi departmental enquinies^Sa'IUe 'alleged-samecliarges.';' -•;'::\;..;^1 '.' ^ ; ;:. ;;:. • •^ The Stafe Golvenmient, m itsla^ cleardiattwo|eru]uuies^wereinitiated^^ by the barrower departm^ |\|«h^^ Ipetition^ w(M'king .^ thereatter, smee the petitionfit^rwas is{sitnated^^^^l^^ t6; on ftj '(he'jf|a^itj 6: department, flle seGond enquiry was initiated by fhe parent department. However, two enquiries may not proeeed against one person oa the same set of charges. Shri Moorthy further submits that tfae enquiry uutiatedbytheTransportDepartmentshaUnot continue but fhe enquiry mitiated by the police department shall continue. Shri Tiwari, leamed counsel appearing fortlle-petitioner submitsthat m the event, departmental enquiry mitiated bytlie Poliee Department continues, all fhe proceedmgs, records and statements recorded in the enquiry mitiated by the Transport Department, may be Iransferred to the Police Department. In view ofthe foregoirig, the grievance ofthe petitioaer stands satisfied. It is accordmgly (^rected, as subnutted by Sfiri Moortfay on Ifae basis of afiidavit datedl20.04.2010,tliat only one enquiry whieh was initiated by the Police Department, shallcoiitmue.KisfurtfaerdirectedlfaataUthe records of the departmenlal eii^ by the Transport Departrnent^may be traiteferred to &eM opportumfyfothepetilibnerteaddte granted. 1::^ . :'; ,>,."',,',.' :, ' " ':::: .:.' Accordingly, the writ petitiQti is disposed ofwith above direetions. No order asto costs. ^SdA-1 SatishK.^Ygmhotri ^udge !Amif 1 IN ssaS