1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVISION PETITION LODGING NO.30 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.560 OF 2005 ALONGWITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.752 OF 2006 Shivnarayan R. Kewat & Ors. ......Petitioners. V/s State of Maharashtra & Ors. ......Respondents. ---- None for the Petitioners. Mr. N.A. Shaikh for the BMC. Mr. R.U. Vasekar for Respondent No.4. Mr. S.G. Surana for Respondent No.6. --- CORAM: V.M. KANADE & S.R. SATHE, JJ. DATE : 27 th June, 2007 (In Chamber at 5.00 P.M.) P.C.:- None appears on behalf of Petitioners. On the last date also, neither Petitioners nor their Counsel were present when the matter was called out. The order which has been impugned in Review Petition was passed by us by consent of the parties. Counsel who appeared on behalf of petitioners at that time had given his no objection to the order which has been passed by us and it was only under those 2 circumstances the said order was passed though it is not specifically mentioned in the said order that it is passed by consent of parties. In fact, Minutes of Order were tendered by Counsel for Petitioners and request was made to pass the order ad invitum in terms of the Minutes of the Order. Since none appears on behalf of Petitioners, we have no other option but to reject the Review Petition. Review Petition is accordingly dismissed. (V. M. KANADE, J.) (S. R. SATHE, J.)