IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI MONDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2009 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 566 of 2008() ---------------------------- OP.665/2007 of FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM .................... PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENT: -------------------------- PICHAMVEETTIL ABDUL JALEL, S/O.IBRAHIM KUTTY, PICHAMVEETTIL HOUSE, VELIMKUNNU P.O., THIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, HAKEEM P.V. BY ADV. SRI.DILIP J. AKKARA RESPONDENTS: PETITIONERS: -------------------------- 1. HASEEBA, D/O.ABDUL AZEEZ, MANANATTU VAKERIVEETIL HOUSE, CHELEMPRA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. VASEEM ABDUL JALEEL, S/O.HASEEBA (MINOR), REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, HASEEBA, MANANATTU VAKAERIVEETIL HOUSE, CHELEMPRA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS FOR R1 & 2 THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. * * * * * * * * * * * * * C.M.Application No.1728 of 2008 & Mat.Appeal No.566 of 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of November 2009 O R D E R & J U D G M E N T Basant,J There is no representation for the appellant. The appellant was granted time on the last date of posting to report whether the matter has been settled or not. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the matter has already been settled between the parties. It is evident that the appellant is not now interested in prosecuting this appeal. The application for condonation of delay is hence dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, the Mat.Appeal shall stand rejected as barred by limitation. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge W.P.Crl/Mat.Appeal No. 2 W.P.Crl/Mat.Appeal No. 3 R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. .No. of 200 ORDER/JUDGMENT 29/07/2009