i-^.l^-C.-V;'^^"^'''-''^''-'"•-" V- IN THEHOl L^HIGHCOUOTOFCHHATTISGARH ^^ATBILASPUR MISCELLANEOUSAPPEALUNDERORDER43RULE10F THECODEOFCIVILPROCEDURE M.A. No. M.b Of2010 APPELLANTS Plaintiffs :1) ^^•^i^' iXSCT^^^«.--^ "p^'e*i5.^^.—-- Oaied...- -" Savita Agrawal, aged 43 years, Wife of Shri Madan Lal Agrawal, R/o. Link Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) Ramkumar Dubey, aged 45 years, S/o. Shri Bhushan Kum.ar Dubey, R/o. Village Chlichirda Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENT Defendant : Q Radhamal, aged 62 years, S/o. ^ ^^ Shri Hasmatmal, R/o. ChakarbhatHa, Bodri, Bilha, District Bilaspur Tahsil <L MISCELLANEOUSAPPEALUNDERORDER43RULE10F THE CODE OF CWIL PROCEDURE R^-^^^^ HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGrARHATBILASPOR M.A.No. 46/2010 APPELLANTS Savita Agrawal and another Versiis RESPONDENT Radhamal SB:- HON»BLESHRI N.K. AGARWAL, J PRESBNT:- Sliri K.A. Ansari, Sr. Advocate with Shri Devesh Kela, ^dvocate, for the appellants. f Tri Somnath Verma, Advocate for the respondent. ^.——.—————————— ORAL ORDER (28-3-2011) 1. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the appeal may be disposed pf directing the trial cpurt to decide the suit within a specific time frame. 2. Prayer is reasonable. 3. Therefore, the appeal is disposed of and it is directed that the trial Court shall decide the suit as early as possible preferably within a period of six months from the date of receiptofa copy ofthis order. 4. Meanwhile, the respondent shall not alienate the suit ^ property. hs \ -sd/-1 \ N.K.Agrawal i i Judge | 9