HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR W.P.(C) NO. 61 1/2011 PETITIONER Mohan Lal, S/o Shri Pardeshi Aged about 48 years, Occupation Kotwar, Village Bhendra, Tahsil Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Revenue D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) The Sub Divisional Officer Revenue Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.) The Tahsiidar, Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance : Mr. Ajay Kumar Barik, Advocate for the petitioner. gt Mrs. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents ORAL ORDER (09.03.2011) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard. The petitioner claiming himself as Kotwar has filed this petition for following reliefs:- “10. RELIEF(S) SOUGHT 10.1 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ of mandamus directing the respondents authority to grant BhUmi Swami Rights in respect of land recorded in Kishtabandi Khatouni (Annexure P—2) total land i.e. 1.860 hectare in favour of the petitioner. \ 10.2 Any other relief, which may be deemed fit by this Hon’ble Court just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be provided in favour of the petitioner." Mr. Ajay Barik, Iearned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the claim of the petitioner is based on judgment of this Court passed in Writ Petition No. 2064/2000, whereby, this Court has directed for grant of Bhumi Swami Rights to the Kotwar. He submits that the petitioner is not pressing this petition at this stage on merits; however, he may be permitted to tile a fresh representation for the reiief(s) which has been claimed in the writ petition before respondent No.3, who in turn may be directed to decide the representation in accordance with law. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Iearned Panel Lawyer appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that if the petitioner tiles a fresh representation along with necessary documents for redressal of his grievances raised in this petition before respondent No. 3, the same shall be considered and decided by respondent No.3 in accordance with Iaw within the period directed by this Court. In view of the submisSionsmade by the Iearned counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of with direction to petitioner to tile representation before respondent No.3 within 10 days from today along with relevant documents and certined copy of this order for redressal, of his grievances raised in this petition. On such representation being made, respondent No.3 is directed to decide the same in accordance with law within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge