IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15292 of 2010 YOGESH SHARMA SON OF LATE RAM LAKHAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLAH- NEW COLONY CHAUDHARY TOLA (LAXMI SADAN) P.S. SULTANGANJ, DISTRICT- PATNA Versus 1. THE CHAIRMAN MADHAYA BIHAR GRAMIN BANK, MEENA PLAZA, SOUTH OF MUSEUM, PATNA 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, MADHAYA BIHAR GRAMIN BANK, MEENA PLAZA, SOUTH OF MUSEUM, PATNA 3. THE CHAIRMAN, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK VICAJEE CAMA PALANCE, NEW DELHI 4. THE SENIOR MANAGER, H.R. DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MADHAYA BIHAR GRAMIN BANK, MEENA PLAZA, SOUTH OF MUSEUM, PATNA ----------- 2 14.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Ranjan Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his compulsory retirement on 31st August, 2009, no terminal benefits have been paid to the petitioner till date despite request. It is submitted that the petitioner was communicated by the respondent no.4 as per letter dated 10th May, 2010 (Annexure-2) that despite several letters the respondent-Gramin Bank is not receiving the required guidelines. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Gramin Bank submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, - 2 - petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.1 with a copy to the respondent no.3. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable may also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)