Cr.R. 105 of 2008 11.7.2008 Present: Shri Ramesh Thakur, Advocate, for petitioner. Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Addl. A.G., for respondent. This revision is directed against the order of framing charge against the petitioner under Section 376 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for petitioner has drawn my attention to the documents on record and statement made by prosecutrix which according to the learned counsel, do not make out any office under Section 376 read with Section 511 of Indian Penal Code. He submits that at the most offence under Section 354 of Indian Penal Code can be said to have been made out. I have perused the documents on record. At this stage, when the evidence is yet to be recorded in the trial, it would not be appropriate to interfere in the proceedings. Obviously, if the documents do not establish even prima-facie the offence for which the petitioner has been charged, he will be entitled to acquittal. This revision petition is accordingly disposed of. July 11, 2008(ms) (Dev Darshan Sud), J.