// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.249/2007 In S.B. Civil First Appeal No.19/2005 {Hazi Mohammad Sabir Vs. Shri Munne Khan and Others} Date of Order ::: 18.03.2009 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri R.D. Tripathi, Counsel for petitioner Shri B.L. Agarwal, Counsel for respondents #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioner has moved this contempt petition for disobedience of the order of this Court dated 12th January, 2005, contending therein that despite the order of status-quo passed by this Court, the respondents have raised certain constructions over the property, in dispute, therefore, they have committed a contempt of the order of this Court and they may be punished suitably. The learned counsel for the respondents, on the basis of instructions of the respondents, particularly the respondent No.4 Chhote Khan, who is present in the Court also, // 2 // submits that whatever constructions raised by the respondents have been removed and they tender their unconditional apology in case any contempt is made out against them. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although his party is not present but this contempt petition may be disposed of on the basis of the statement of the learned counsel for the respondents with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh contempt petition in case the statement of the learned counsel for the respondents is found to be incorrect. After considering the submissions of the learned counsel for both the parties the contempt petition is disposed of on the basis of the statement of the learned counsel for the respondents and with liberty to the petitioner to move fresh application in the same matter in case the statement of the learned counsel for the respondents is found to be incorrect. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//