: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.27 OF 2006 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.27 OF 2006 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.27 OF 2006 Shri.Trimbak Haribhau Kale .. Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Shri.Harshad E. Palwe for the applicants. Shri.Vikas J. Takalkar for respondent No.2. Shri.Rajesh More, APP for the State. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 13TH DECEMBER, DATE : 13TH DECEMBER, DATE : 13TH DECEMBER, 2006 2006 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . My attention is invited to the orders passed by this Court from time to time in these proceedings which are directed against orders on a complaint instituted u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant-accused had agreed to pay to the original complainant the entire amount. That is how, the notice was issued by this Court. Later on, it is recorded that : 2 : Rs.1.00 lac has been paid by Demand Draft, which has been duly recieved by the complainant. The further sum of Rs.50,000/- was to be paid to the second respondent by the first week of December, 2006. I am informed that this amount has been reduced by consent to Rs.35,000/-. Since then consent terms are executed by them stating that the sum of Rs.35,000/- has been duly paid and the original complainant accepts it in full and final settlement of all dues. Parties tender consent terms duly signed by them and their advocates. The same are taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. Order in terms of consent terms. . In the circumstances, the criminal revision application is disposed of accordingly. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.)