1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION (Z) NO.778 OF 2011. IN L.P.A. ST. NO.12851 OF 2011. IN WRIT PETITION NO.6149 of 2010 (D). (The Asstt. Provident Fund Commissioner, Nagpur Vs. Sadhana Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Amravati) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Shri Anoop Parihar, Advocate for Appellant. CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE: NOVEMBER 28, 2011. Shri Parihar, Adv. for the applicant/appellant. Prayer is to condone the delay of 162 days in filing Letters Patent Appeal. We have also heard learned Counsel to find out whether there is any merit in the challenge. We find that the learned Single Judge has correctly found that Code Number was allotted belatedly by the applicant. In this situation the action under Section 14-B was found to be unwarranted. 2 We therefore, do not see any merit in the Letters Patent Appeal. Therefore, we reject prayer for condonation of delay, consequently the Appeal also stands rejected. JUDGE JUDGE NSN