IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE ELECENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY C.C. No. 1134 of 2006 & W.P.No.17685 of 2004 W.P.No.1134 of 2006: Between: 1 Mohd.Abdul Rab, S/o Mohd.Abdul Ghani, R/o Plot No.30,31, 107, 108 & 109, Tajnagar, Gopanapalli Village, Sherlingampally Mandal, R.R.District 2 Mohd.Khaja, S/o Mohd.Zaheeruddin, R/o D.No2-64/1/9/A, Tajnagar, Gopanapalli Village, Sherlingampally Mandal, R.R.District 3 M.A.Rahman, S/o Late Md.Afzal, R/o Plot No.47, Tajnagar, Gopanapalli Village, Sherlingampally Mandal, R.R.District 4 Abdul Bari, S/o Late Md.Abdul Khadar, R/o Plot No.43 and 44, Tajnagar, Gopanapalli Village, Sherlingampally Mandal, R.R.District 5 Md.Ziaur Rahman Khan, S/o Md.Rahman Khan, R/o Plot No.13, Tajnagar, Gopanapalli Village, Sherlingampally Mandal, R.R.District 6 Md.Habeeb Bullah, S/o Md.Azeemullah, R/o Plot No.56 to 63, Tajnagar, Gopanapalli Village, Sherlingampally Mandal, R.R.District . PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Sherlingampalli Mandal, Sherlingampalli, Ranga Reddy District 2 The Sherlingampally Municipality, Sherlingampally, Ranga Reddy District represented by its Commissioner 3 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, declaring the action of the 1st respondent in demolishing and further trying to demolish the houses of the petitioners herein situated at Gopanapalli Village, Sherlingampalli Mandal, Ranga Reddy District without issuing them any notice and without making any loss estimations and compensation as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art.21 of the Constitution of India and it is further consequently prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondents no to demolish the said buildings of the petitioners without paying the compensation, to the occupied lands of the petitioners and to the portions to be demolished, in violation of Art.300-A of the Constitution of India and the guide lines issued by this Hon'ble Court in the case of P.Lakshmana Rao Vs. Executive Officer 200(5) ALT 346 (DB) and M.Madhavilatha Vs.Rajendranagar Municipality 2001(2) ALT 482 and pass such other or further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.R.SANKU & KAVITI MURLI KRISNA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: Common Order: It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that there is dispute with regard to title and he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition as well as contempt case with liberty to approach the civil court for appropriate relief. Recording the submission of the counsel, both the Writ Petition and the Contempt Case are dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach the civil court for appropriate relief. No costs. ___________________ A.GOPAL REDDY,J. 11-07-2008 Murthy ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To The Mandal Revenue Officer, Sherlingampalli Mandal, Sherlingampalli, Ranga Reddy District 2 The Sherlingampally Municipality, Sherlingampally, Ranga Reddy District represented by its Commissioner 3 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 4. 2CCs to the G.P.for Revenue (OUT) 5. 2CD copies