HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.6216 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.08.2011 **** Narinder Pal Kaur . . . . Petitioner VS. Financial Commissioner, Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner is aggrieved by the orders dated 31.05.2006, 12.09.2008 & 05.05.2009 (Annexures P4, P5 & P6, respectively) in terms whereof the mutation pertaining to the inheritance of late Ajaib Singh s/o Diwan Singh earlier sanctioned in favour of Baldev Singh (deceased husband of the petitioner) on the basis of an alleged Will dated 17.8.2001 has been set aside on the objections filed by the widow and daughter (respondents No.5&6 respectively) of late Ajaib Singh. (2). The authorities have concurrently observed that since there is a civil dispute pertaining to the validity of the Will dated 17.8.2001, the mutation in respect of inheritance of late Ajaib Singh cannot be sanctioned in favour of the alleged beneficiary of the Will. (3). No exception can be taken to the view formed by the Authorities below. Suffice it to mention that in case the petitioner succeeds in establishing the genuineness and execution of the Will in question the natural consequences shall follow. CWP No.6216 of 2011.doc - 2 – (4). With these observations, the writ petition stands dismissed. 08.08.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge 2