IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 12985 of 2007 Decided on: May 19, 2008 Anand Kumar and another …Petitioners Versus Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: None for the petitioners Mr. Vivek Lamba, Advocate, for the respondents. M.M. KUMAR, J. The prayer made in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution is for quashing notification dated 11.11.2004 (P-5) to the extent of making amendment in Rule 3 by inserting sub-rule 2-B in the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board (Sale of Immovable Property) Amendment Rules, 2004 (for brevity, ‘the Rules’), being illegal, arbitrary and void. It has been prayed that the provisions made by the amended rule is violative of the Punjab Agricultural Market Produce Act, 1961 (as applicable to Haryana) and Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. C.W.P. No. 12985 of 2007 The aforementioned question has come up for consideration before a Division Bench of this Court on an earlier occasion in C.W.P. No. 17016 of 2007 (Tek Chand v. State of haryana and others, decided on 30.1.2008, Annexure R-1). After detailed consideration the aforementioned writ petition has been dismissed. We are satisfied that the issue is covered against the petitioner in view of the aforementioned Division Bench judgment. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and the same is dismissed in terms of the Division Bench judgment rendered in the case of Tek Chand (supra). (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (SABINA) May 19, 2008 JUDGE Pkapoor 2