IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19848 of 2010 PARMESHWAR SAHAY @ MUKESH JEE son of Maheshwar Sahay------ Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 4. 26.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Accused petitioner and victim girl are physically present in the Court while learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and State are there to state their respective case. Petitioner is alleged for kidnapping informant’s daughter. By appearing she is accepting to reside with the petitioner without stating any act of kidnapping rather her voluntary act. Learned counsel for the informant is there only to state that she is minor till today. But in any case if statement of the victim girl is taken into consideration, petitioner is entitled for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Sonepur P.S. case no.29 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J.)