^ ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fS)NO.^>^€/2010. PETITIONERS : 1. Saradha Ram Chouhan, aged about 36 years, S/o. Shri Mangal Prasad Chouhan Peon ^.^-v-;a' p^)>wvB'^ ^^ presently address Pre-Middle ^ p.^-' ^Q',^^w;...^r Ashram Shala, Badenama Koni, Block Baramkela, District Raigarh (C.G.) 2. Ksheer Sagar Yadav, S/o. Sadhuram Yadav, aged about 35 years, Peon, Adiwasi Balak Chhatrawas, Bonawapara, Block Baramkela, Disfrict Raigarh (C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS /" 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Throught : the Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare Departmnet, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) /"" 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Department Raipur (C.G.) ^'. 3.r The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Raigarh Department Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONStITUTION OF INDIA '^wrrr'^^T^ '3~Sf ^|<q|(»i<Lj, ^tli^f^Ko, [®i<'1l'Hl4,< .L&....^... S:..£..-36..<S.I(P •^Fl200 3^?T ^^ (^q?^^) -sn^T ^r f^^ ^m^n^r^^ri^ ^^TW^fN^lt^T SB : HON*BLB MR. JUSTICE PRET 08.11.2010 Shri Ramakant Pandey, cour Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Dy, G.A. |sel for the petitioners. jfor the State. Grievance of the petitionerl though they are entitled for reg-ular| years of their sennce but the sam.e Counsel for the petitioners s| representation (Annexure P/3) coll( decided. He submits that ends ofjiJ are permitted to withdraw this pe| detailed representafcion. He submifl the resp. N0.3 for deciding their re^ State counsel has no objectic representation and the same is beirj Accordingly, the petitioner^ petition \vith liberty as afbresaid. such representation. by the petitioj form. the date of receipt of copy decided by the competent authori| months. It is made clear that this on merits of the case and the autN to deci.de the same strictly in accort <^Hi<n<^-i 'RT^ff "^ ^St <f^i^i< '^^tRma??^ :HKER DIWAKER in the present petition is that Ipay scale after completion of fchree \IQ.S not been granted to them. ^bmits that the;/ have already filed tctivelv but the same has not been |stice would serve if the petitioners iition with liberty to make a fresh s that direction may be issued to )resentation expeditiously. )n if the petitioners make any such ig decided in accordance with law. are permitted to withdra.w this In the eventuality of making a3iy lers within a period of two weeks >f this order, the sa.me would be y within. a further period of three Cdurt ^ has not expressed &ny opinion 5rity concerned would be at liberty lance with law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge