CS No.47 of 2004. 12.11.2009 Present: Plaintiff Sudesh Kumar Gupta in person with Mr.Sanjeev Kuthiala, Advocate. Mr.G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr.B.C. Verma, Advocate, for defendants No. 1 to 3. Mr.Baldev Singh, Advocate, for defendant No.4. When this suit was taken up for further proceedings today, Shri Sudesh Kumar Gupta, partner and authorized signatory of the plaintiff, submitted that an out of Court settlement has been reached with defendants No.1 to 3 and he does not wish to pursue the suit so far as these defendants are concerned. Ex.Z contains the terms of the compromise. (Original seen and returned and copy retained on the record). Let this document be translated by the official translator of this Court. From the written statement of defendant No.4, I find that this defendant has admitted the execution of the agreement to sell with respect to the suit property and is still ready and willing to execute the sale deed with respect to the land belonging to him. The only condition is that the plaintiff should pay the balance sale consideration. A decree for specific performance as prayed is granted for the suit land of defendant No.4. The plaintiff will call upon defendant No.4 to execute such writings etc. and perform all such acts, deeds and things necessary and as may be required for obtaining permission etc. from the State Government. The defendants shall cooperate with the plaintiff and assist him in obtaining all the permissions etc. required under law. The balance sale consideration shall be paid to defendant No.4 at the time of execution and registration of sale deed. A date convenient to both the parties for execution CS No.47 of 2004. (2) and registration of the deed shall be fixed by mutual agreement. It is further directed that in case the defendant aforesaid does not comply with this decree, the same be executed by a Commissioner to be appointed by this Court. The suit is dismissed as withdrawn qua defendants No.1 to 3 and suit is decreed with respect to defendant No.4. All miscellaneous applications are disposed of. All interim orders shall stand vacated. November 12, 2009 (Dev Darshan Sud) (aks) Judge.