Crl.M.No.M 8561 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M 8561 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 22, 2010 Rajdeep Kaur and another .....Petitioners v. State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Parties in person with Mr.J.P.Dhull, Advocate. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondent nos.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent no.4. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent no.1, i.e., Superintendent of Police, Kaithal, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 19.3.2010, Annexure P6, already made to him by petitioner no.1. As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners are major. Date of birth of petitioner no.1-Rajdeep Kaur, as per copy of Middle Standard Examination Certificate, Annexure P1, is 18.3.1992, and age of petitioner No.2- Dilbag Singh, as per copy of Identity Card issued by Election Commission of India, Annexure P2, is 23 years as on 1.2.2006. They got married on 19.3.2010, as per marriage certificate, Annexure P3. Photographs of the marriage are Annexure P4. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.1, Crl.M.No.M 8561 of 2010 (O&M) -2- i.e., Superintendent of Police, Kaithal, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 19.3.2010, Annexure P6, already stated to have been moved to him by petitioner no.1. 22.3.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge