IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 11299 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 20th January, 2011. Food Corporation of India Petitioner through Mr. Vikash Chatrath, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner seeks quashing of the orders dated 02.09.2009 and [Annexures P-9] passed by the Collector, Hoshiarpur as well as the order dated 17.02.2010 [Annexure P-10] whereby its appeal has also been dismissed by the Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar and it has been directed to deposit a sum of `9,08,988/- towards additional stamp duty and the registration fee in respect of Sale Deed No. 19631 dated 21.10.2009 got registered in the office of the Sub Registrar, Garshankar, District Hoshiarpur. [2]. The undisputed facts are that the petitioner purchased land measuring 23 kanals 5 marla from New Mandi Township, Punjab for `1,53,000/-. At the time of presentation of the Sale Deed, the Sub Registrar, Garshankar found that the price of this land was not calculated at current market value and as such after registration, the sale deed was sent to the Collector under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act. [3] It is not disputed that vide order dated 11.10.2010 rendered in CWP No. 1743 of 2009 [Dhani Chand & Ors. v State of Punjab & Ors.], the same question has been answered against the petitioner. [4] For the reasons mentioned in Dhani Chand's case [supra], this writ petition is also dismissed. January 20,2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE