FAO No.474 of 2008 22.10.2008 Present: Mr.Pawan Guatam, Advocate, vice counsel for the applicants/appellants. CMP(M) No.968/2008 For the reasons set out, the application is allowed and the delay is condoned. The application is disposed of. CMP No.825/2008 For the reasons set out, the application is allowed and order dated 11.9.2008 is recalled. The matter is restored to its original position. The applications is disposed of. CMP (M) No.804/2008 Issue notice returnable in three weeks. Steps be taken immediately. 22nd October, 2008 (Sanjay Karol), J. (C) FAO No.299 of 2008 22.10.2008 Present: Mr.Vivek Thakur, Addl. Advocate General, for the appellants. Mr.M.L.Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents 1 to 5. CMP No.831/2008 Minor respondents No.2 to 5 are permitted to sue and be represented through their mother and natural guardian Smt. Shanti Devi, respondent No.1. The application is disposed of. FAO No.299 of 2008 The balance amount stands already deposited. Learned counsel for the parties pray that the matter be disposed of at the stage of admission. Prayer allowed. List the matter in December, 2008 for admission, hearing. The record be also called for in the meantime. 22nd October, 2008 (Sanjay Karol), J. (C) FAO No. 150 of 2008 22.10.2008 Present: Mr.Ashwani K.Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr.T.S.Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr.Dinesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents 2 to 4. Mr.Dinesh Thakur undertakes to file power of attorney on behalf of respondents No.2 to 4 in the Registry of this Court during the course of the day today. CMP No.170 of 2008 Order dated 27.3.2008 has been complied with. The application is disposed of. Admit. Learned counsel for the parties jointly pray that the matter be heard early. List the matter in December, 2008. 22nd October, 2008 (Sanjay Karol), J. (C) 22.10.2008 Present: Mr.Anand Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Baldev Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 10. Mr.Vivek Thakur, Addl. Advocate General, for respondent No.11. After the matter was heard for some time and various judicial pronouncements of the Apex Court were brought to my notice, Mr. Anand Sharma, under instructions from his clients expressed his desire not to press the petition subject, however, to the trial Court considering taking appropriate action against S/Shri Swaran Singh, Harbans Singh, Gurbax Singh and Harpreet Singh, if after the decision of the matter, the Court is of the view that on a careful scrutiny and appreciation of the entire material action, in accordance with law, is necessarily required to be taken. The petition is disposed of. Uninfluenced by any observations made in the impugned order dated 30.7.2008, it is expected of the trial Court to appreciate the entire material for just decision of the trial and also to decide the question of taking appropriate action, if any, against the aforesaid persons at the time of final decision of the trial. The observations made by the Court with regard to the veracity of statements of PW-3 and PW- 4 shall not come in the way of the final decision of the matter by the trial Court. In view of the above, pending application, if any, shall stand disposed of. Dasti copy on usual terms. 22nd October, 2008(C) (Sanjay Karol), J.