THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5174 OF 2011 DATED: 08.12.2011 Between: Sri Jagadguru Shankaracharya Mahasamsthanam, Dakshinam Naya, Sri Sarada Peetham, Shringeri-517139, Karanataka, rep.by its Dharmadhikari Sri P. Krishna … Petitioner And 1. Alakapuri Welfare Association, Office at 11-13,223, Road No.13, Alkapuri, Rangareddy District, rep.by its Secretary Sri S. B.Radhika …Respondents HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5174 OF 2011 ORDER: The revision petitioner is the defendant No.1 in O.S.No.3241 of 2006 on the ﬁle of the Court of the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B. Nagar. The respondent No.1 is the plaintiﬀ. The suit is ﬁled for permanent injunction against the revision petitioner and the respondents 2 and 3 herein for perpetual injunction in respect of the suit schedule property. The plaintiﬀ/1st respondent herein ﬁled I.A.No.4555 of 2006 in O.S.No.3241 of 2006 under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 of C.P.C. and after hearing both the parties the trial Court granted temporary injunction as prayed for by order dated 18.06.2007. Aggrieved by the same, the revision petitioner preferred C.M.A.No.144 of 2007 in the Court of the Principal District Judge, Rangareddy District. While dismissing the said appeal, by judgment dated 30.06.2011, the trial court was directed to dispose of the suit within a period of three months. Hence the present Revision Petition by the defendant No.1. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the material available on record, I do not ﬁnd any justiﬁable reason to interfere with the ﬁndings recorded by the trial Court that the plaintiﬀ had established a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience was also in favour of the plaintiff. The said ﬁndings were rightly upheld by the lower Appellate Court. Therefore, the temporary injunction granted in favour of the plaintiﬀ warrants no interference by this Court. As noticed above, the appellate Court while dismissing the appeal directed that the main suit itself shall be decided expeditiously thus protecting the interest of both the parties. Hence this Revision Petition is devoid of any merit. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed making it clear that the suit shall be decided on merits uninﬂuenced by any of the ﬁndings/observations made in this order or in the orders under Revision. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 08.12.2011 Note:- CC by 12.12.2011 (B/O) gbs