IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 11040 of 2008 Between: 1 Gulla Jagadeeswari, W/o. Nagaraju, R/o. Mulagalampalli, Jelugumilli M. , W.G.district 2 Rajulapati Venkata Lakshmi, W/o. Satyanarayana, R/o. Mulagalampalli, Jelugumilli M. , W.G.district ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Mulagalampalli Grampanchayat, rep by its secretary, Mulagalampalli, Jeelugumilli M, W.G.District. 2 The Mandal Parishad Development officer, Jeelugumilli M,W.G.District. 3 The District Collector/District Manager, The A.P.Housing Construction Corporation, W.G.District, Eluru. 4 Thota Veeranna, S/o. Surayya, Mulagalampalli, Jeelugumilli M, W.G.District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ or order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring action of the respondents 1 to 3 not releasing loan amounts Rs.48,050/- to each petitioners contrary to proceedings vide R.C.No.249/- Indiramma/Phase II/2007-2008 30-9-2007 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to release the loan amounts and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.NARAM.NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.M.PRABHAKAR RAO The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no lis to be adjudicated in this writ petition and the matter has become infructuous. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 7th July, 2009 bcj