IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 289 of 2005 Between: Uppala Kedareswaramma, W/o. Kameswara Rao, Hindu, R/o. Chillaragollapalem, Bapatla, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Associate Dean, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Bapatla, Bapatla Post and Mandal, Guntur District. 2 The Registrar, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not regularizing the services of the petitioner in Class IV posts in the existing vacancy fell under B.C. "B" category as illegal, arbitrary and in violtion of principles of Natural Justice and further direct the respondent No.1 to regularize the services of the petitioner in Class IV posts in the existing vacancy fell under B.C. "B" category. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.GANDURI NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: MR.B.SIVA REDDY The Court at the admission stage made the following Order: This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in not regularising the services of the petitioner in Class-IV posts though some posts fell vacant under BC-B category. The petitioner was appointed as a casual labour in the respondent University in the year 1988. Since then she has been discharging her duties. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that though the petitioner is senior and there are vacancies in the category of BC-B, the case of the petitioner has not been considered. Hence, she prays to direct the respondents to consider her case. On the other hand, learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents contended that the petitioner has not made any representation to absorb him in the post of Class-IV category. The facts are not in dispute. Whether the petitioner is entitled to be absorbed in Class-IV post or whether any vacancy has arisen in the BC-B category has to be decided by the respondents and even, the respondents have to decide the regularization of the causal employees basing on the seniority. Therefore, a direction is given to the petitioner to file an application to the respondents and the same shall have to be considered by the respondents as per rules in accordance with seniority within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the application of the petitioner. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 19.01.2005 usd To 1 The Associate Dean, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Bapatla, Bapatla Post and Mandal, Guntur District. 2 The Registrar, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad.