IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 23780 of 2004 Between: N. Adinarayana S/o N.V.P. Sai, R/o Plot No. 137, Flat No. 304, R.K. Nivas, Jayanagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Inspector of Police, Sanjeev Reddy Nagar Hyderabad. 2 The Sub-Inspector of Police, Sanjeev Reddy Nagar, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in harassing the petitioner by calling upon him the police Station without any valid complaint against him as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents not to harass the petitioner by calling upon him to the police Station and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.V.RAGHU VEER Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents are harassing him by calling him to the police station without any valid complaint. 2. Counter has been filed by the respondents stating that based on a complaint filed by one U. Subba Rao they have a registered a case in Cr.No.1083 of 2004 for the offence under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code and investigation has been taken up. During the course of investigation it was revealed that the petitioner is closely acquainted with the activities of the accused, K. Srinivas, in the aforesaid crime. It is further stated that except enquiring the whereabouts of the said accused with the petitioner, the police never interfered with the civil rights of the petitioner and he was never called to the police stating and he was never arrested. 3. In view of the aforesaid categorical denial of all the allegations made in the writ affidavit, I am of the opinion that no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J April 23, 2008 DSK