IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3697 of 2002 Between: 1 G. Narasaiah S/o Pullaiah R/o H.No. TRT 53, Industrial Housing Colony, Jawahar Nagar, RTC X Roads, Hyderabad-500 044. 2 G. Kousalya W/o G. Narasaiah R/o H.No. TRT 53, Industrial Housing Colony, Jawahar Nagar, RTC X Roads, Hyderabad-500 044. 3 G. Sathyananad S/o G. Narasaiah R/o H.No. TRT 53, Industrial Housing Colony, Jawahar Nagar, RTC X Roads, Hyderabad-500 044. 4 G. Yogananad S/o G. Narasaiah R/o H.No. TRT 53, Industrial Housing Colony, Jawahar Nagar, RTC X Roads, Hyderabad-500 044. 5 G. Gajanand S/o G. Narasaiah R/o H.No. TRT 53, Industrial Housing Colony, Jawahar Nagar, RTC X Roads, Hyderabad-500 044. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Commissioner of Labour, Tanguturu Anjaiah Bhavan, RTC 'X' Roads, Chikkadapalli, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Tank-Bund, Liberty, Hyderabad. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent, in not considering the representation made by the petitioner on 24-2- 2001 seeking no objection certificate from the first Respondent and in not permitting the application Lr.No. 18/110 & 111/2001, dated 1-1-2001 made by the petitioner to the second Respondent is as illegal and arbitrary and violative of articles 14 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the first respondent to issue on objection certificate and further direct the second respondent herein to allow the petitioner's application to construct a new house after dismantling the existing house. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No. 3697 of 2002 Order: Sri Rayudu, learned counsel, representing Sri D. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the writ petition and the matter has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. Date: 07.04.2009 Nsr