IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21137 of 2011 Bharat Yadav, Son of Shiv Mandir Yadav, Resident of Village Jamira, P.S. Ara Muffassil, District Bhojpur (Bihar) -------Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party ---------------- 03/- 21.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon copy of the case diary. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 272, 273, 414 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(A) of the Excise Act. In this case relating to recovery of wine in huge quantity instituted against three named, petitioner’s name emerged during investigation. Submission is that except that petitioner had some telephonic talk with one of the named accused Bhutali Singh, there is absolutely nothing against him. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, in spite of being armed with the case diary up to paragraph nos. 67 dated 25.01.2011 could not refute the aforesaid submissions and also not pointed out anything otherwise against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara, in connection with Krishna Garh Barhara P.S. Case No. 119 of 2010, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for one year or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)