IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5661 of 2010 SHEOJEE PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.02.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a Police case under Section 364A of the Penal Code is that co-accused Pappu Pandey, Jogi Mian and Pawan Tiwary have been enlarged on bail. The last has been granted bail following the earlier. This application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below after he completes like period of custody as co-accused Jogi Mian and Pappu Pandey whose bail were rejected earlier by this Court but came to be granted subsequently when co-accused Pawan Tiwary has been granted bail on the premise that the earlier two had been granted bail, without being prejudiced by the present order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)