U1- CFI1IIIII1165165 IN TUS HZGH COURT OE GHHATTXSGARH AT BXIASPUS writ Pet-Ltion No._IffS" / QQ n p •». ij i & Petitlonec Respondents sub i'lajor A.D.Arora (Retd. ) B-15, Poultry Area, Ni.l.okheri. Karaa1, Haryana. Versus 1. state of Ghhattisgarh through seeretary Department of Home D.K.s.Aawan, Sa.ipur (cs) 2. superlntendent of Pol.i.ce Raigarh (CG) 3» station House Officer Tamnar D-Lstt. Raigarh (C.G.) c,<^ .y\ HIGHOOURTQF.IUDICATURecyUAmSG^ttCBILASPUR DIVISIONBeNCH CQRAM: PETITIONER: RIESPONDENTS: HON'BLE SHRI H.L. DATTU, CJ AND HON'BLE SHRI V.K. SHRIVASTAVA, J. Writ Petition No.l71S of %106 Sub ^4ajor A.D. Arora (Retd.) State of Chhattisgarh and othere Present: Shri Prateek Shsuma, Amicus Cwiae for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for the Stete/ respondente. QRAI-OBDEB IPassed on 15th February, 2007) The following wal order of the Court was passed by H.L. DATTU, CJ. On a letter received from the father of a missing person,this Court had directed the Registry to treat the letter SB a writ petition. 2) After registering the case, this Court had directed the respondents to fite their retums. Respondents have fited three comptonce reports dsrted 27- 4-2006, 24-11-2006 and 9-2-2007. In these reports, they have stated the efforts made by them in tracing the missing person. After going through the said reports and abo the annexures frted along with the reports, we are satisfied that the respondente/polfce authorities have made an honest attempt to trace the missing person, but they have faited in their attempt. We cannot expect the polkse authorities to cto anything more in this case. 3) In that view of the mattw, the writ petitton requires to be rqected and accordingly, it is rqected. Ordered aooordngly. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Jfudge ^