IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10903 of 2010 SHEOPUJAN SAHANI, SON OF LATE SATYA NARAYAN SAHANI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-JITWARA, POLICE STATION-MADHUBAN, DISTRICT-EAST CHAMPARAN. …………………………………………………..PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………OPPOSITE PARTY. --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. B.N. Mishra, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Dinesh Singh, A.P.P. ------- 2. 9.4.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 3/4 of the R.P. (U.P.) Act. As per the allegation set up in the First Information Report, the petitioner was apprehended while some persons allegedly were carrying the articles stolen from the Railway yard and all the stolen articles were dumped at the house of the co-accused, Dr. Nagendra Prasad. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the he was only a labour, however, he was also arrested though the alleged recovery is from the house of the co- accused, Dr. Nagendra Prasad, which was under construction. It is also contended that the co-accused, Dr. - 2 - Nagendra Prasad, had already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 4.9.2009 passed in Criminal Misc. No.30714 of 2009. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 6.7.2009 and is having clean antecedent. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Sheopujan Sahani, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, District-West Champaran, in connection with Trial No.608 of 2009 arising out of R.P.F. Bapudham Motihari Case No.03 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, after his release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)