IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.101 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17640 of 2010 ====================================================== Pramod Kamti .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Thakurjee Shri Shri 108 ,Sita .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rohit Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA) 4 30-11-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears on behalf of the respondent No.2 despite valid service of notice. Learned counsel for the petitioner from the order dated 1.9.2010 declining to accept the written statement submits that not only was the full enhanced cost deposited, but also that the written statement stood filed on 31.8.2004 which could not be brought to the attention of the Court adequately when the writ petition was being disposed off. Subject to the fact that the entire enhanced costs had been deposited by the petitioner before 1.9.2010 and the written statement filed on or before 31.8.2004, the order dated 3.2.2011 in C.W.J.C. No.17640/10 is reviewed on payment of further costs of Rs.1000 against the petitioner as the Court is satisfied that the developments in the suit have Patna High Court C. REV. No.101 of 2011 (4) dt.30-11-2011 2 been stultified on account of lack of diligence on his part in complying with timely deposit of costs and filing of written statement. Subject to the same, the Civil Review application is allowed and the order dated 3.2.2011 in C.W.J.C. No.17640/10 modified accordingly. The application is allowed. Krishna Chandra Jha/- (Navin Sinha, J)