IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7812 of 2008 INDESHWAR PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 27/08/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is alleged to have raped the informant. Submission is that the petitioner is closely related and he being the cousin cannot commit such offence. He has been implicated on account of land dispute. It is not possible that rape has been committed in presence of witnesses. The lady has described the manner in which she was raped by this petitioner. Considering the allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail in the court below after examination of the prosecutrix before the trial court. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)