... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.359 OF 2004 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.359 OF 2004 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.359 OF 2004 Shri Devchandbhai Lala Solanki ...Applicant Vs. Administration of Daman & Diu & Ors. ...Respondents Shri Sandesh D. Patil for the Applicant. Shri S.S. Pednekar, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : R.S.MOHITE, J. CORAM : R.S.MOHITE, J. CORAM : R.S.MOHITE, J. DATE : JANUARY 16, 2006. DATE : JANUARY 16, 2006. DATE : JANUARY 16, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. This is the Revision Application filed by the original complainant impugning the order dated 17.06.2004 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Diu. I perused the impugned Judgment and Order. The court has rightly come to the conclusion for the cogent reasons that the prosecution failed to prove that the accused committed forgery with intention of cheating. The ingredients of cheating were held not to be proved as not a single witness as examined to indicate that the accused deceived him. Not a fit case for retrial. Hence, leave refused and consequently the Revision is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE