1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.87 OF 2011 COMMUNIDADE OF NAGOA THROUGH ITS SPECIAL ATTORNEY JOAO FILIPE PEREIRA ..... Applicant. V/s. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, GOA IDC AND ANR. ..... Respondents. Mr. S. D. Padiyar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. M. S. Sonak, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM : S.B. DESHMUKH & F.M. REIS, JJ. Date : 24th January, 2011. P.C.:- We have heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. In paragraph 10 of the Judgment, we have observed "Unless such evidence is adduced, it would not be possible to determine the market value of the land acquired on the basis of the sale instances sought to be relied upon by the Appellants." In our opinion, by speaking to minutes 2 motion, instead of words “sale instances” words “said instances” can be directed to be read. The contention of the learned Counsel that the said words be replaced by the word “Judgments”, is misplaced. 2. With this, we allow the misc. civil application in part and direct that the words “sale instances” to be read as “said instances”. 3. Civil application accordingly is allowed and disposed of. S.B. DESHMUKH, J. F.M. REIS, J. ssm