IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 2700 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 24, 2009 Food Corporation of India and others ...... Appellants Versus Sant Kumar Chopra ...... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. Narender Yadav, Advocate for the appellants. Mr.Premjit Kalia, Advocate for the respondent. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. In terms of order dated 9.7.2009 learned counsel for the appellant has fairly stated that the liability of the respondent is Rs. 39, 453.80 ps. Learned counsel for the respondent has stated that he has no objection if this amount is retained by the appellants subject to the result of the writ petition. In the circumstances the decree of the Courts below is modified to the extent that the appellants shall be entitled to retain the sum of Rs. 39, 453/- subject to the result of the writ petition filed by the respondent. Consequently it is directed that out of the amount deposited by RSA No. 2700 of 2008 (O&M) -2- the appellants in the trial court Rs. 39, 453. 80 ps be refunded to them and the remaining be released to the respondent. This appeal is disposed of in the above terms. Since the main case has been decided, all the pending Civil Misc. Applications are disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE July 24 , 2009 sunita CM Nos. 1492-1493-C of 2009 and RSA No. 545 of 2009 (O&M) Present: Mr. G.S.Sandhawalia, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1. *** CM No. 1493-C of 2009 Reply to the application for condonation of delay filed. In the reply it is stated that in fact the delay was not of 3 days but of more than three months. For the reasons recorded in the application, the delay in filing this appeal is condoned. CM stands disposed of. CM No. 1492-C of 2009 For the reasons recorded in the application, the delay of 45 days in refiling the appeal is condoned. CM stands disposed of. RSA No. 545 of 2009 Adjourned to 29.7.2009. To be shown in the urgent list. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE July 24, 2009 sunita CR No. 269 of 2009 Present: Mr. Balwinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. *** Learned counsel states that an application Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC was filed but the same could not be listed today. Adjourned to 6.8.2009. Registry is directed to list the aforesaid application on the next date of hearing. It is made clear that the Land Acquisition Collector need not be present on the next date. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE July 24, 2009 sunita CR No. 1978 of 2009 Present: Mr.Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioners. *** Mr.Malkeet Singh, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of respondent no.1 whereas Mr. Pardeep Goyal, Advocate has appeared on behalf of respondent No.5. Both the learned counsel request for adjournment. Adjourned to 5.9. 2009. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE July 24, 2009 sunita CR No. 3705 of 2009 Present: Mr. Mukul Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. *** As per report respondent No.2 has already been served. However, on the last date I had granted permission to learned counsel for the petitioners to serve the LRs of respondent No.1 through their counsel before the trial court. As per report the said counsel has stated that he does not have the address of the respondents. It also deserves to be mentioned that respondent No.2 is also one of the legal representatives of respondent No.1,since deceased. Let fresh notices be issued to the legal representatives of the deceased respondent returnable on 7.10.2009. In the meantime further proceedings are stayed. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE July 24, 2009 sunita R.A. No. 199 of 2009 IN CWP No. 5859 of 2008 Present: Mr. Madan Pal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Advocate for applicant-respodnents No. 6 to 12, 14, 16 and 17. Mr. Madan Gupta,Senior DAG, Haryana. *** In compliance with the order dated 10.7.2009 learned Senior DAG has filed affidavit of the Executive Engineer, Public Health Engg. Division No.1, Karnal. The same is taken on record. Adjourned to 3.8.2009. To be shown in the urgent list. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE July 24, 2009 sunita RSA No. 2472 of 2005 Present: Mr. I.K.Mehta,Sr. Advocate with Mrs. Ranjit Mehta, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for respondent No1. *** At joint request of the learned counsel, adjourned to 11.9.2009. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE July 24, 2009 sunita