IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.302 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Moh. Sahazad S/o Ikbal ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: March 11, 2010 ____________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.411/2009 Under Sections 302, 394, 201, 120B and 411 of IPC P.S. Kotwali Ranipur, District Haridwar ________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri K.S. Verma, Advocate for the applicant as well as Sri M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State and perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is not named in the FIR. It is a matter of circumstantial evidence and the chain of circumstances is not complete against the applicant so as to connect him with the above-said crime. It is further submitted that the co-accused Sahazad S/o Tazamul has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 19.1.2010 and the present applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant-Moh. Sahazad S/o Ikbal be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. The bail application is disposed of accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 11.03.2010 RG