HICat OOURT OF CHHATnSSARH AT BUASPUR ContemBt PeUtlon Vo. 109 ofaOOS Stn^e Beach: Hoa'ble Slu-t Satfadi K. Agnlliotri, J. Petitioiier Respoiidents 2. K.P. Patel, S/o Late Shri Ramashankar Patd, aged about 59 years, Executive Exigineer (Ci(n09, Water Resoiuce Dwisfoii, Jashpur Nagar (Chlwttisgarh) -Ver»a»- Vrock Dhand, Secreteiy Etepartmcnt ofWater Resources, D.K.S. Bhaaram, Raipur (Chhattis^ifa). Mahainn^id Saiai, ChiefE^igineer, Haadeo KacUhar, Water Resouices Department, BBaspur (CUhattisgarh. Mr. Sanjay K. Agiawal, Advocate for the Pctitioner. ORAL ORDBR (14(tl December 2005) This court by judgment and cader dated 7.9.2005 p^sed directfon as foUows, "For fhe teasons stated above, fhe petitfon is altowed aad the respondents are dnected to coasider IIie case of the petitfoiier along with ofher eligibte candidates strictfy in accordan.ee wiBi fhe provisions of the Rules, 2003 to grant proniottDn. Consequently, fhe napugned order dated l.4.2005 staads quashed and set aside. The petitiDi»ris eatitled.to continue as Executive Engineer on the basis crfad ^ / hoc proinotton tBU thc D.P.C. coxisiders fhe case of the pctitioner in accordance'wifh fhe provisjons ofRutes, 2003.* Learaed counsel appeanng &r the petitioner submits tfaat the respondents have not coiupUed with fhc order of ttus court deliberatety and intentioxially by transferru^; tfae petitfoncr fixim fhe oflfice of Qiief Engmeer, Minanata Bango Paryojaiia, Bflaspur '.^ to the ofl&ce of the Chief Ei^ineer, Hasdeo Kachhar, Water Rcsources Department, BUaspur in fhe saine capacily as Ad hoc Executive Eayyaeer. Leamed counsel for fhe petitfoner furfher subnute fhat this aiaounts to non-coinpliaace and violatioa of fhis courfs oider dated 7.9.2005 passed in W.P. No. 1514/2005. 'Hiis js for fhe einployer to traasfer an entplpyee fioin one place to othcr place ia accordancc with adnunisteative convenience and public interest, even ofhctwise, that was not the issue in fhe writ petition. This court has not directed ttie petitioner to post him at onc place forever. The respondents have conapUed with fhe directfon passed by fhis court by judgment and order dated 7.9.2005 in W.P. No. 1514/2005. There is no qiiestion of any coatempt for the reasons stated above. Accoidioffy, the conteinpt petitiDn is dismissed. No oxder as to costs. _ _ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge !3.siblu