-^.;i S^^ss^s^y^ ^•SS€Sv£SS-SSSS^^•^g^s BB ^ i^l^ *] 854. R'sa.iffs.: ^S^UIi IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASFUR (C.G.l W.KsSo........'..7.:.........../2006 PETITIONER: .A.y' \^.< ^^ /N^ ST^ ^@r%r ^ff'-y f»UrC^yy/ 1. Shantu Ram Tiger S/o Shri Bagwa Ram , Aged 40 year's Workmg as L.D.T. (Tribal Department) at Govt. Primary School, Duraardeeh, sarangarh , R/o Buldega, Tehsil Pathalgaon, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 2. Gopi Ram Jolhe S/o ChaituRam Aged 36 years, Working as L.D.T. Primary School Sarangarh, R/o Andola, Tehsil Sarangarh Dist. Raigarh. 3. Madan Sai Paikara S/o shri Nan Sai Paikara, Aged 32 years, working as L.D.T. at F'rimary School Nawapara, sarangarh, R/o Kundkel Khajri Tehsil Pathalgaon Dist. Jashpur. 4. Siya Ram Paikara S/o Dhobh sai Paikara Aged 40 years Working as L.D.T. Priinary School Jarapali Sarangarh R/o Sugajori (mayumacha) Tehsil Bagbahar Dist. Jashpur (C.G.) 5'. Maria Goretti Kujur D/o Josef Kujur Aged 36 year Working as L.D.T. at Primary School Amlipali sarangarh R/o Dhodidand (Patratoli) Tehsil Kunkuri Dist. Jashpur (C.G.) ,6. Tara Chand Sidar S/o Sukhiram Aged 40 years, Working as L.D.T. at Primary School Gaandharachuwa Sarangarh, R/o Munapara Tehsil Pathalgaon, Dist Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. District Education officer, Education Department, Raigarh Dist. RaigarhfC.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER OF LIKE NTURB ETC :- ^^L XI-HC-78 s^^rprRpr, ®Tfl*f'i<B,Ridiy^< . 09. p. C^ ^- 7c><T^/tfS *iiHm a»wrai W=[ 200 3T1^?rqg^ (l^gfg^gr) 3n^r?irfeNi craran^Tsbiiti gsnWHfgcr^n^T <»>i<<fii41-< Ki*«i1'ff tet^<Ri«^i< ^iSTf^Tsn^r Subhosh c •fr- 19.12.2006 Shri Har'ish Khutiya, Ad Advocate for the petitioner*(s). Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel L<nvy •ocate and Shr'i <4kshay yadav, der for the respondents/Stcte. Wrth the consent of lear^ed counset for the parties, the petition is heard findly. Gommon ofder dictated in| Court, passed separateiy. Writ Petition (S.) 7058/2W6 in Sd^ : :;. . Satish K. Agiuhotri Judge P.T.O. HI6H CQURT^F^HHATnS©ARHAT BILASPW W. P.fSVNo 7058/2006 Pe+itioners Versus 9iantu Ram Tiger and otiiers State of Chhattisgarh & another W. P.?S5 No. 70B9/2G06 Elizabeth Toppo Versus Respondenti W. P.CS) No. 7060/2006 Versus KeSDondents Fujyan+' -Sufab %alxo State of Oihattisgarh &unother S; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satlsh K. Agnihotn. J Siri 1-larish Khutiya, Advocate and Shri Akshoy Yadav, Advocute for he petltioner(5). s. Sunita Jain, Pane! Law^er fo;- tiie respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on this 19 day of Decsmber, 2006) TTie foilowing order of the Court is for the petitioners as also for •tiie State/respondents jointly submit tiiat the facts of the present wrlt aetitions are similar to that of in W. P. No. 5742/2006 (AAadan Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others), which vws disposed of vide order dated 27.10.2006. They further submit that the question of law invotved is also the same. 2. In view of the above stated subfflissions made by learned counse! for the parties the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order da+ed 27.10.2006 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 5742/2006. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be piaced on record in connected matters. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhs^h