1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.92/2006 IN W.P. NO.990/1992 & L.P.A. No.252/2005 (Decided) Smt. Rukhama wd/o Hemraj Nikhare ...Versus... Shri Waman Govindrao Tekam -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri V.G. Wankhede, Adv. for respondent] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 18.07.2008 None for the petitioner. Counsel for the respondent is present. Learned Counsel for the respondent makes a statement that pursuant to the order made by this Court to deposit 50% of the back wages, major amount was deposited and paid to the petitioner. Finally, the balance amount of Rs.15,418/- remains, for which cheque has been prepared and was attempted to be served on the Counsel for the petitioner, but he refused to accept the same. According to learned Counsel for the respondent, when this cheque was tried to be sent by 2 registered post a/d, the same was returned back with endorsement that addressee left the place. Learned Counsel for the respondent therefore states that the respondent has made all attempts to comply with the order made by this Court. Statement accepted. The contempt proceedings are dropped. Contempt Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. It is made clear that the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation shall take steps by personally sending its officer in search of the petitioner and pay her the said amount by cheque within a period of four weeks from today. JUDGE ssw