IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2011 / 21ST POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 944 of 2011(P) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- GEORGE P.P., AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. PAPPU, VADAKKAKATH HOUSE, EZHUPUNNA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.T.JESTIN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA, PIN-688 001. 2. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ALAPPUZHA, PIN-688 001. 3. THE SUB REGISTRAR, KUTHIATHODE, OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, KUTHIATHODE, ALAPPUZHA, PIN-688 532. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P (C) No.944 of 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 11th January, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that he has decided to sell 6 cents of property comprised in Sy. No.312/8/1/4 of Ezhupunna village. It is stated that aggrieved by the fair value fixed for the land, on the appeal filed by the petitioner, Ext.P1 order was passed modifying the fair value fixed for the land. Though the fair value fixed in Ext.P1 order has not been notified so far, petitioner wants to register his document as per the fair value fixed by Ext.P1. It is in these circumstances seeking a direction to the 3rd respondent to allow the petitioner to register his sale deed, the writ petition is filed. 2. Going by the rules, unless Ext.P1 is notified the fair value mentioned therein cannot have any effect. Therefore, at this stage, this Court will not be justified in directing the 3rd respondent to register the sale deed, with the fair value mentioned in Ext.P1. In the circumstances, appropriate order to be passed is to direct the 2nd respondent to ensure that the notification in pursuance to W.P (C) No.944 of 2011 2 Ext.P1 is issued, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and on that basis the 3rd respondent shall register the document, if presented by the petitioner. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before respondents 1 and 3, for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma W.P (C) No.944 of 2011 3