IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 20TH MAY 2010 / 30TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 33353 of 2007(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SUSHEELA, AGED 43 YEARS, PARAYILVALAPPIL, KOLACHERI AMSOM, THALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT SRI.K.N.ABHILASH SMT.R.LEELA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- KOLACHERI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KOLACHERI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.P.R.VENKETESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.33353/2007-U ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 20th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the respondent-Panchayat to consider Ext.P2 representation. The petitioner herein constructed a building in the property mentioned in Ext.P1 in the year 2006. Ext.P2 is the representation filed by the petitioner for numbering the building. It is alleged that the respondent-Panchayat refused to number the building of the petitioner. It is also pointed out that even though the petitioner approached the respondent several times, nothing was done in the matter. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Ext.P2 representation. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Panchayat also. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no action has been taken, presumably due to the fact that the writ petition is pending. There will be a direction to the Panchayat to take a decision on Ext.P2 in accordance with law and communicate the decision to the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms