IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38884 of 2011 Diwesh Singh @ Dhandhan Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 3 21.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected several times by another Bench of this Court. But again this bail petition has been filed on the ground that there is no progress in the trial of the petitioner whereas he is in jail custody since 20.2.2007. Learned counsel for the informant points out that the petitioner has chequered criminal history and he is accused in 14 criminal cases in the District of Aurangabad. He also points out that due to non-cooperation of the petitioner and the other accused the learned trial court could not succeed to conclude the trial of the petitioner and other co-accused persons. Considering the aforesaid facts and submissions of the parties I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is hereby rejected. However, I.G., Prison, is directed to ensure the production of the petitioner before learned F.T.C. Vth, Aurangabad, in connection with S.Tr.No.90 of 2010 arising out of Aurangabad Muffasil P.S. Case No.1 of 2007, so that trial court could conclude the trial of the petitioner along with other accused persons in time. The office should bring this order to this notice of the I.G., Prison by 2 writing a letter to him. Further more learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and conclude the same as early as possible even by taking the trial of petitioner and other co-accused on day to day basis. AnilKrSinha (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)