IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 5TH AUGUST 2010 / 14TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).NO. 24580 OF 2010(O) ------------------------------------------ CMA.13/2010 OF SUB COURT,NEYYATTINKARA .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. WILSON LASER, HOUSE NO.X/130, VAIKKUZHY VEEDU, OLATHANNY, NEYYATTINKARA P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. JOSE S.WILSON, HOUSE NO.X/130, AVIKKUZHY VEEDU, OLATHANNY, NEYYATTINKARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPRUAM 3. K.SANTHI, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.XXXI/111 AVIKKUZHY VEEDU, OLATHANNY, NEYYATTINKARA P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.M.CHANDRA BOSE SRI.N.SREEKUMAR (ELAMAKKARA) SRI.A.RAJASIMHAN RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. MARY MATHA EDUCATION SOCIETY, REGD NO.T.284/9, PALIYODY, DALUMUGHAAM P.O., NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN R.MURUGAN. 2. R.MURUGAN,CHAIRMAN, MARY MATHA EDUCATION SOCIETY, RESIDING AT RAJKOT, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. M.CELINE, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.X/130, AVIKKUZHY VEEDU, OLATHANNY, NEYYATTINKARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. S.SHEEJA, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.X/130, AVIKKUZHY VEEDU, OLATHANNY, NEYYATTINKARA P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. A.P.AJITH,MEENACHIRA ROADARIKATHU VEEDU, PULIYARKONAM, DALUMUGHAM, NEYYATTINKARA P.O. NEW RESIDING AT USHUS, NARUVILA, NEYYATTINKARA P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. W.YESUDASAN, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.IX/193 AVIKKUZHY VEEDU, OLATHANNY, NEYYATTINKARA P.O THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J. ==================================== W.P(C) No.24580 of 2010 ==================================== Dated this the 05th day of August, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are the appellants in C.M.A. No.13 of 2010 of the court of learned Sub Judge, Neyyattinkara. That appeal is in challenge of an order passed by the learned Additional Munsiff-II, Neyyattinkara on I.A. No.3141 of 2009 in O.S. No.485 of 2009 of that court. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for petitioners submitted that until trial court passed the impugned order petitioners were very much part of Governing Council of respondent No.1 and that it is necessary that the C.M.Appeal is disposed of at the earliest. According to the learned Senior Advocate notice on the application for condonation of delay in filing the C.M.Appeal is not served on the respondents and says that petitioners are prepared to get notices served through special messenger (process server of the court below). Early disposal of the C.M.Appeal is requested for. 2. I have gone through the records. Having regard to the circumstances stated by learned Senior Advocate and the W.P(C) No.24580 of 2010 -: 2 :- urgency pointed out learned Sub Judge is directed to dispose of the C.M.Appeal as expeditiously as possible. I also make it clear that if notice on the application to condone delay and C.M.Appeal are not so far served on respondents, learned Sub Judge shall consider whether notices could be served through special messenger as requested by petitioners. Learned Sub Judge shall make every endeavour to dispose of the C.M.Appeal as expeditiously as possible. Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. vsv W.P(C) No.24580 of 2010 -: 3 :-