IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15389 of 2008 RAJENDRA MUKHIYA & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 5.5.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as also the learned A.P.P. for the State. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner no.1, namely,Rajendra Mukhiya, was apprehended during the pendency of this application, and as such, the learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the application so far as petitioner no.1 is concerned. The prayer for anticipatory bail of Rajendra Mukhiya is hereby rejected. So far as the remaining petitioner nos.2,3 and 4, namely, Sonarwati Devi, Deo Narayan Mukhiya and Sarita Devi are concerned, they apprehend their arrest in connection with Nirmali P.S.Case No.5 of 2008 registered under Sections 498A, 323 , 379 I.P.C. as also Section-3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and have prayed for anticipatory bail on the ground that except for one occurrence dated 10.1,2008 there does not appear to be any specific and pointed allegation against any of them. By nature , the allegation made in the complaint petition which gave rise to the Police Case appears to be general and omnibus in nature. Due regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest/surrender by the petitioners, namely,Sonarwati Devi, Deo Narayan Mukhiya and Sarita Devi in the - 2 - court below within three weeks from today , they shall be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Nirmali P.S.Case No.5 of 2008 to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate,Birpur, subject to the conditions as laid down in Section- 438(2) Cr.P.C. ( Abhijit Sinha,J ) NKS/-