IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 22163 of 2010 Hori Lal ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. P.K. Rohilla, Advocate for the petitioner. RANJIT SINGH J. The petitioner was accused of not taking appropriate action in investigating the case of the murder. He was punished with the stoppage of 3 increments, in the year 2005. Subsequently, this punishment was withdrawn, which has again been restored by the DGP in exercise of suo motu revisional power. To me, the action of DGP appears justified, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case. The DGP has the relevant powers, which he exercised in the best interest of the organisation. I am, thus, not inclined to interfere in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Dismissed. December 13, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE