IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No. 10861 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : JULY 23, 2009 BALJIT SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Ms. Sonia G. Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) It is the admitted case that the petitioner was absent for 75 days, without sanctioned leave. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to point out any illegality in the procedure adopted by the respondents in taking the impugned action. All that has been pointed out is that the past record of the petitioner has also been seen. I have considered the issue. The earlier conduct of the petitioner of being absent 12 times Civil Writ Petition No. 10861 of 2009 2 since 1998 till 2002, has been considered by the respondents along with the misconduct at issue. I find no illegality in the impugned action and, therefore, find no reason for judicial review of the action of the respondents. The petition is dismissed in limine. July 23, 2009 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?