1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CA NO. 9553 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 19207 OF 2008 (Keshav Baburao Padeer vs. Smt. Mrudula Keshav Padeer) WITH CA NO. 9555 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 19215 OF 2008 (Keshav Baburao Padeer vs. Smt. Mrudula Keshav Padeer & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. APRIL 03, 2009. Heard Shri Pande, learned counsel for the applicant/ appellant. I am satisfied that actually there is no delay. During hearing, the grievance was made by Ms. Udeshi, learned counsel appearing for the respondents that huge arrears of maintenance are being recovered and for that purpose salary is attached but attached portion is inadequate. Liberty to the respondents to move appropriate application for the said purpose. As there is grievance that the maintenance amount is in arrears, the present application is allowed, subject to payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- in each matter by the applicant to the respondents by 13.4.2009. If the amount is paid, the office to register First Appeal and place it for further consideration. JUDGE *GS.