IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24183 of 2011 1.Sanjeet Dubey son of Devendra Dubey 2.Sunil Dubey @ Sunil Kumar Dubey son of Devendra Dubey 3.Devendra Dubey, son of Harish Chandra Dubey All residents of village-Sursand, P.S.-Sursand Dist.-Sitamarhi Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 22.7.2011. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned counsel for the State. It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that petitioner no.3 has already been taken into custody and, as such, his application for grant of anticipatory bail has become infructuous. Hence, the application so far as it relates to petitioner no.3 is dismissed. The case is under sections 447, 387 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the informant and accused persons are co-villagers. A dispute relating to land is going on for which a legal notice was already issued on behalf of the accused persons to the informant of the case on 1.3.2011 and on receipt of such legal notice a reply was also given on behalf of the informant through lawyer. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that there is no truth behind the allegation of demand of “Rangdari”. Taking into consideration the fact that petitioners and the informants are co-villagers and there is probability of false implication owing to on going land dispute, let petitioners, namely, Sanjeet Dubey and Sunil Dubey @ Sunil Kumar Dubey in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of 2 four weeks from the date of communication of the order be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Sursand P.S. Case No.34 of 2011. Md.S. ( Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)