IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5867 of 2010 1. Smt. Lalita Singh W/O Sri Ravindra Kumar Singh R/O Ward No. 16/19, Gangjalla, Saharsa, P.O., P.S. & Distt.- Saharsa Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Department Of Welfare, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 2. The Director, I.C.D.C., Bihar, Patna 3. The Divisional Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa 4. The District Magistrate, Saharsa 5. The District Programme Officer, Saharsa 6. The Sub Divisional Officer Saharsa, Distt.- Saharsa 7. The Child Development Programme Officer Block- Ahra, Distt.- Saharsa 8. The Ward Counsellor, Ward No. 15 Nagar Parishad, Saharsa, Distt.- Saharsa ----------- 3. 09.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The question involved in this writ application relates to appointment on the post of Anganwari Sewika. On the own showing of the petitioner she has been given a due hearing by the District Magistrate before termination as also in the appeal preferred by her before the Commissioner. Which is the dominant populace of the area, who constituted the dominant populace of the area are all disputed question of fact for which the executive authority are best suited to decide. Anganwari Sewikas are an Agent of the Government and do not stand at par with Government servants for any purpose except natural justice. The standard 2 of scrutiny with regard to their appointment cannot be the same as held in 2004 (2) PLJR 833 (Sajjan Devi Vs. State of Bihar). Similar view has been taken in C.W.J.C. No. 3769 of 2009, C.W.J.C. No. 5244 of 2010 and L.P.A. No. 772 of 2011. If so advised the petitioner may pursue her remedies appropriately in light of the observation contained in the order of the Division Bench. The writ application is dismissed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)