1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICIATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.14 OF 1992 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-I, Bombay .. Applicant. V/s. The Raymond Woolen Mills Ltd. .. Respondent. INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.94 OF 1999 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-I, Bombay .. Applicant. V/s. M/s.Sea Containers P. Ltd. .. Respondent. INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.102 OF 1999 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-VI, Bombay .. Applicant. V/s. M/s.Rediffusion Adv. Limited .. Respondent. Mr.B.D. Damodar i/b. Kanga & Co. for the respondent. INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.306 OF 1999 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-VII, Bomba .. Applicant. V/s. Kishore Rasiklal & Other .. Respondents. Mr.A.N. Kotangale i/b. K.C. Sidhwa for the applicant. Mr.Mohan Salian i/b. Gagrats for the respondent. (except I.T.R.No.102 of 1999) CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH OCTOBER, 2005. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Revenue. He 2 fairly pointed out that considering the quantum of tax involved in all these references, these references can be disposed of applying the law laid down by this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Camco Colour Co. CIT V/s. Camco Colour Co. CIT V/s. Camco Colour Co. [(2002) 254 ITR 565 (Bom)] [(2002) 254 ITR 565 (Bom)] [(2002) 254 ITR 565 (Bom)] and followed by this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Pithwa Engg. Works [(2005) CIT V/s. Pithwa Engg. Works [(2005) CIT V/s. Pithwa Engg. Works [(2005) 276 ITR 519 (Bom)] 276 ITR 519 (Bom)] 276 ITR 519 (Bom)]. 2. Accordingly, all the references are returned unanswered with no order as to costs. ********