IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23952 of 2009 KAMESHWAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 29.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is an accused in relation to Navinagar P.S. Case No. 84 of 2008 which was instituted under section 365 and later on section 364A of the Indian Penal Code has been added. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the he was arrested with one Lalan Paswan but there is nothing to explain as to what is the exact role the petitioner has played in the crime in question, though the petitioner stands chargesheeted. He has criminal history but those cases are too far back and are not of the same nature he has been in custody for more than a year. With the kind of evidence the petitioner should be enlarged on bail and he is willing to cooperate in the trial as and when required. Keeping the material in mind and the period of custody, let the petitioner, namely, Kameshwar Yadav be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Navinagar P.S. Case No. 84 of 2008. One of the sureties will be executed by the father of the petitioner and other by close blood relation of the petitioner on due identification by - 2 - the court below. The petitioner will further appear on each and every date fixed in the case either by himself or through his counsel and will not abscond or intimidate the witnesses. Any breach of the terms may disentitle the petitioner from the privilege of bail. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)