1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5875 OF 2005 Pradeep Kumar Mewalal Jaiswal and Ors. .. Applicants Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.A.Z.Mookhtiar Ajay Vijay Yadav for applicants Ms.Kranti Hiwrale i/b. P.G.Lad for complainant Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 12th December 2005. P.C. . Since talks of settlement between parties 2 are in progress, learned Advocate appearing for applicants states that he would be satisfied if the investigating authority gives him prior notice in the event of I.O. comes to a conclusion that arrest and interrogation of applicants is necessary. 2. Mr.Saste, A.P.P. states that I.O. would give 72 hours prior notice in case I.O. desires to arrest the applicants. In these circumstances application allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to take out fresh application in the event of aforesaid notice. All contentions are kept open. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)