IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20219-2011 Date of decision:29.07.2011. Aman Dhillon ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. ADS Sukhija, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. A.S.Rai, DAG, Punjab. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) While issuing notice of motion and granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, on the oral request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the complainant was also impleaded as respondent No.2. As per office report, his service is complete. Meaning thereby, the respondent No.2 has been served but no-one has put in appearance on his behalf. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned State Counsel, on instructions from ASI Kamal Narain, concedes this fact and submits that the petitioner is not required for further interrogation. In view thereof, the order dated 08.07.2011 passed by this Court is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein. The petition shall stand disposed of. July 29, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE