TA No.392 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH TA No.392 of 2011 Date of decision : 14.09.2011 Dr. Ritu ...Applicant Versus Dr. Ravinder Mehta ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr. R.S. Rai, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. D.S. Brar, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocate, for the respondent. JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. (Oral) 1. The present application has been preferred by the applicant- wife, under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying for the transfer of the petition titled as ‘Dr. Ravinder Mehta Vs. Dr. Ritu’, filed by the respondent under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short `the Act'), from the Court of learned District Judge, Sangrur, to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Ludhiana. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. 3. The present application has been filed in anticipation of the applicant’s shifting to Ludinana for better professional career. From the perusal of the application, there is nothing to show that at present, TA No.392 of 2011 2 the applicant is not residing at Sangrur. The applicant is presently posted at Government Dispensary, Mastuana, as Medical Officer, which is just 5 kms. from Sangrur City, where she is presently residing. The transfer application filed by the wife is without any basis. 4. In the absence of any evidence on record to establish that any inconvenience is being caused to the applicant at Sangrur, the present application cannot be allowed merely on unfounded grounds. There is no merit in the application and the same is accordingly dismissed. 14.09.2011 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) atulsethi JUDGE Note : Whether to be referred to Reporter ? Yes / No