1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7387 OF 2009 Prakash Barade .. Petitioner. Vs. Manikant Chandulal Shah .. Respondent. Mr.R.R.Kalekar for the petitioner. Mr.N.J.Patil for respondent no.1. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE, J. DATED : 30TH SEPTEMBER, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition is arising from the orders passed by revenue authorities in R.T.S. proceedings. The petitioner claims right in the property on the basis of the registered sale deed dated 15.12.1988. According to the petitioner, he has purchased the land admeasuring 81 Ares from Gat No.68 (Old Gat No.662), while according to the respondent, he is original owners of Gat No.68 and he had sold hardly 20-21 Ares of the land to the petitioner by the aforementioned sale deed. In view of the nature of controversy involved I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition and I am satisfied that the following order shall meet the ends of justice: It is open to the petitioner to approach Civil Court for 2 appropriate reliefs. If the petitioner institutes any proceedings in the civil court and if the suit is ultimately decreed in his favour it would be open to the petitioner to approach the concerned revenue authority for effecting necessary changes in the record of rights. If the petitioner files any proceedings, as aforementioned, the concerned court shall decide the same on merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the observations made by the revenue authorities in these proceedings. With these observations the writ petition is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)