1 CP No.378/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO.378 OF 2011 ,In WP/7008/2009 D.ED. COLLEGE KRUTI SAMITI THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT H A MAHANUBHA VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Bayas Anandsing AGP for Respondent 1: Mr.VH Dighe Advocate for Respondents 2 & 3: Mr.SC Bora. ***** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 24th NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : 1) Heard. Five educational institutions, named in paragraph 5 of the contempt petition, claim that the order dated 11.6.2010 of the Division bench in Writ Petition No.7008/2009, is not adhered to. The Division Bench in paragraph 4 of its order had directed the respondents, as under; “4.- In that light of the matter, we are inclined to allow the petition and consequently we allow the petition and quash and set aside the impugned orders. The respondent no.3 shall remand the matter back to the respondent no.2 for a de novo 2 CP No.378/2011 decision afresh from the stage of scrutiny/permission to the petitioner – institute for the academic year 2010-2011. The Respondent No.2 shall take into consideration the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid judgment. The respondent No.2 shall deal with the application on its own merits and pass orders, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.” 2) Mr.Bora, learned counsel representing the respondents Nos.2 and 3 informs, the authorities have taken a decision in respect of the claims raised by petitioner – Kriti Samiti and five such cases, viz. Raje Pratishthan Shri Mayureshwar D.Ed. College; Adhyapak Vidyalaya, Pune; Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Shikshan Sanstha and late Yashwant Deshmukh Adhyapak Vidyalaya, are decided alone, while the case/claim of Jai Ambika Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, D.Ed. College is to be decided in the next WRC meeting. 3) The learned Counsel for the respondents further submits, so far as two more petitioners are concerned, since they have not responded to the show cause notices, the issue could not be 3 CP No.378/2011 taken. 4) Mr.Bayas, learned Counsel for petitioner submits, his clients are not served with such show cause notices. Learned Counsel accepts for service of show cause notice and shall receive requisite papers from the respondents, within fifteen days from today. Thereafter, as per rules the orders to follow 5) In the set of above situation, I do not see that there is any breach on the part of the respondents in complying of the orders of the Division Bench. Contempt Petition disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/