THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6833 of 2011 ORDER: In this writ petition, petitioner is seeking a mandamus declaring the action of respondents 1 and 2 in calling him and his wife to the Police Station at the instance of the third respondent, as illegal and arbitrary. It is the case of the petitioner that he is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.1.08 guntas in Survey No.74 of Khanapuram Haveli Village, Khammam Urban Mandal, Khammam District. It is stated that the third respondent is bent upon to grab the aforesaid property and he filed O.S.No.408 of 2007 in the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Khammam and the said suit was dismissed. It is the grievance of the petitioner that at the instance of the third respondent, respondents 1 and 2 are interfering with their life and liberty by calling him and his wife to the police station and asking them to sit hours together. When the matter came up on earlier occasions i.e. 18.03.2011 and 21.03.2011, it was adjourned to enable the learned Government Pleader for Home to obtain instructions. Today, when the matter is taken up, on instructions, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 and 2 that there was a complaint filed by the third respondent under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before the learned II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Khammam, against the petitioner and his wife alleging that on 28.11.2010 at about 1.00 p.m., the petitioner and his wife trespassed into his house in Survey No.74 of Khanapuram Haveli, near Reliance Petrol Bunk and demolished the constructions by using crowbar and hammer and caused a loss of Rs.10,000/-. On such complaint, the matter was referred to the police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Thereupon, a case in Crime No.39 of 2011 was registered for the offences under Sections 427, 447, 506, 294(B) IPC read with 34 IPC. It is further submitted that in the aforesaid crime, investigation is almost completed and for evading arrest, the petitioner approached this Court in view of the crime registered against him and his wife. It is also submitted that except investigating into the crime aforesaid, there is no interference with the life and liberty of the petitioner and his wife and they were not asked to sit hours together in the police station as alleged. When the matter was referred on the private complaint filed by the third respondent, Crime No.39 of 2011 was registered and the matter was investigated into by the police. Such investigation by the police cannot be termed as interference. As it is stated that except during investigation into the aforesaid crime, the police are not interfering with the life and liberty of the petitioner and his wife and not insisting them to sit in the police station hours together, I deem it appropriate to record such statement made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 and 2 and direct respondents 1 and 2 to file final report in the aforesaid crime as expeditiously as possible. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 30th MARCH, 2011. kvni