,0°^ -'!-. L xa_TME_ia»a eef'w_®2'ssaiGAWViE^w •liiASCTs. ; 39 7.. wius; fsaism's so» ~ ^/2»»A s .j^s^ .--•:^.^^...- .^•^s^"' ?^€^^'" w^ - P ^•;"'^Ji'I>^^yl'As&ish srliaRXd. Si/» @&iffl<aa»at i:^'-^^"" "" Kfaai'SiifcuiKk «»e*a»<reA~38 ye»£»» resiiiaat •£»»tiimra»i vEas»s t ,-t) S-tate •£©hfaafetissadi v-" tt*sw»a&.tlut svswwtsrf^ ».K»»hi»»a»»»»;l»tt»». a)®tpafffFSeietat •t yM;®e»j ,<8hisutttis»atia,»—ailseReail Oaarter». Salymvf »)su»enac«aa<eat•f »*Ij.it«»^ »»E»,Bistt. lltes'i,. ebtiattl.Bgarft* 4)3Nte sbaitiwk a««ss©ffiiearii; :yMee st«tl,»a»Bttrgle.s.fc WS33 VKS'ES'tW WttSS. &RTICUE 22( @1P, THB eeilsa'ITIISIBB ®?IfflBXA ^9^. —• XJ-HC-22 3. ^lPTRra, tSill-H'16,. ^..ft..l'2-c!'~).. •3TRSI ^l | R;ii'?? siitSr ^^T^ ^Ti5?[ •BI^I '^R!IW T^ +!<ii"lJJr'l-< '"FRfl 4 fs17t Tfa7?TC ^? SIRTq •3iR3?[ 3f 3). |0-5 f< 1 .' Shri P.Diwakar leamed cc^unsel for the petitioner. -Shri Deep Kesharwani leajiied paael lawyer for the State. Shri Kesharwam submitsl respect of the offence committed b;t that since the challan has been filed,this petition has become iniructuous. Th^ relief sought for in this petition is to issue a direction to the respondents to ple challan agamst the accused persons in them on the basis of materials available in the case diary. The challan has been| ffled after the investigation was made, Shri Kesharwam suhmits that the challaln has been fBed on the basis of inaterial collected by the investigatmg oflic^r,therefore,it is submitted that there is no other issue which survives conside^ation by this Court. Mr. Diwakar submits that though the offences complainefl of are very serious m nature,the challan suhmitted by the police indicates j:hat the ofiences are of lighter nature. It appears that furthei remedy would'not lie before this court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 ofthe) Constitution oflndia inasmuch as tlie mam relief of issuing direction to the pol^ce to file challan has ah-eady been complied with. In my view the petitione: can not be said to be without remedy ifhe is not Satisfied with the chatlan subnutted by the police in respect ofthe offence committed by the accused personsl. In my view the petitioner has every right and liberty to raise any point mclu^mg the fact that the charge-sheet does not tatly with grave ofifence conamtted |>y the accused persons before the competent criminal court. I With the above observatioi^s and directions the p^ition is disposed of. Certified copy as per niles. 1 <,;^/_ . ^- ChiefJustice ^L ^o «