C-78 ^3wT <-<41<41<?)q, U>T^f1<l<»,Rrtl'dy r\^ *ll*loi ^TT^ sn^?T <racp (4cii^6i<^) ^200 3H^$Tc^R-lich craT3ff^$T.c^Tfcp ?;(?TT^ ;fff^T 31T^9T fSinale Bench; Hon'b le Mr. Justice bhirendra Mishra) W.P. PETETEONER (PetitionU/A S.K.S Singh, Kailasl Vs RESPON&ENTS 1. StJ Ta Av. Rai 2. Dir Ka- Tr< 3. Th ^ 4. Th Bai 5. Th Tn 6. Nh D.l< Present: Mr. R.K. Jaiswal, Advocate for the Mr. Arun Sao, Panel Lawyer for th< 17.11.2008 Heard on admission. The petitioner by the ins1 order dated 4.10.2008 (Annexu unilaterally relieved for his transl chi^if^^ ^i^oT^'f^t ^Fjtt^i^ ?l?3Tf^T3Tl^?T s1 No.6372/2008 Joi|nt |26 of Constitution of India) |ngh, aged around 47 years, Son of Shri R.L. Resident of Plot No.89, Industrial Area, Nagar EkTa Chauk, Bhilai, Distt. burg (CG) ite of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, <niki Shiksha, Jan Sakti Niyojan Vibhag im Pradyogiki Vibhag, &.K.S. Bhawan, |pur(ce). ector/Additional birector (Ranjana ^akwar),, &irectorate of Employment and ^ining, Bayron Bazar,Raipur (C6). Vice Principal (R.L Kanwar), I.T.I. Bhilai, ^•) Training Superintendent (binesh Chand tai), I.TJ. Bhilai (C.G.) Director General, Employment and ^ining Mmistry of Labour, New belhi, India. Secretary, Takniki Shiksha, Jan Sakti |ojan Vibhag Avam Pradyogiki Vibhag, .5. Bhawcn, Raipur (CG) petitioner. State. lant petition has prayed for quashing of the [e P-5) whereby the petitioner has been ^erred place i.e. I.T.I. Beejapur by respondent iSSii^r^ C-78 ^'r^^!^ ^wT '-qi^K')^, ^TTltt<l<?, Rrtltt^ *ll4loi ^^TT^ 3TT^?T q^cf? (^cll^dcg) ^200 3TT^$TcynR-f|cb cT^T3TT^^T^^fcf) ^^TW ^Tf^T 3TT^9T furlther t)|jrg No.l and further direction to the duties at I.T.I. Bhilai. Grievance of the petition^r I.T.I., Beejapur vide order dated transfer order was dismissed by 1|h dismissal of writ petition was Court. The petitioner was appoint| & Election Registration Officer, was relieved by the Prindpal, I.T.] P-3). However, he was unilateral| (Annexure P-5) and the Princip| Annexure P-5 relieved him from Registration Officer, vide letter copy of order on the petitioner. Election Registration Officer reli( returned his services to original 13.10.2008, however, responden^ petitioner. Learned counsel for the p( Registration Officer relieved the services to his original petitioner has not been relieve{J jrespondents to allow the petitioner to join his cm^fo<i1Ti ^i+irtT^ Vs^ ^Rit^i^ ^ 3Tf^T 3H^$T •ione|r, in nutshell, is that he was transferred to 17.7.2008. His writ petition against the above |his Court and writ appeal against the order of dismissed by the Division Bench of this ^d as Supervisor by the Sub bivisional Officer vide Annexure P-1 & P-2 and accordingly he t., Bhilai vide order dated 1.10.2008 (Annexure |y relieved by respondent No.l on 4.10.2008 d, I.T.I., Bhilai in complianceof order of ^hilai for Beejapur and requested the Election tlated 6.10.2004 of Annexure P-4 to serve the On the basis of order of Annexure P-6, the ^ved the petitioner fromthe election duty and [department i.e. I.T.I. Bhilai vide order dated No.3 refused to accept joining of the ^titioner vehemently argued that the EIection ^etitioner from election duty and returned his departi^ent i.e. I.T.I. Bhilai and thereafter, the from Bhilai. In these circumstances the ^3wT;=ZTTO7c5?T, lPT^tl<l<»,^rtl^^ *ll*1rtl a?TT^ 3fT^9T q^cf? (ijclljdcg) ^ 200 3n^$TcinRriJ<h ^PTT3TT^^T^WP ^NB^^818^' ^ ^PTTW? ^ff^T 3TT^9T ^ trte petitioner could not be compell^ Beejapur without being formally I have heard learned couns^l The transfer of the petiti{ as on petitioner's own saying his vijr decided by the Division Bench of| record it is also observed that I.T.I. Bhilai as also respondent No| duty and in these circumstances the transfer order and give his j<|) grievance on technical ground tha|" ITI Bhilai is without any substan<|:< I.T.I. Bhilai for his transferred pl(|ic For the aforesaid reasons, deserves to be dismissed and acco^< stage itself. No order as to costsj <p<^f^<nTi *ii+irtT^'f^€t<<Fji^i^ ^3lf^lT3TT^ST l^d to go and join at his transferred place r41ieved by the I.T.I Bhilai. ^l for the petitioner. )ner to Beejapur has.already attained finality vijrit appeal against his transfer order has been Ithis Court. From the documents available on petitioner has been unilaterally relieved by |1. He has also been relieved from the election ^he petitioner was duty bound to comply with )ining at the transferred place Beejapur. His he was relieved by the Election Officer for \^e as he stood already relieved unilaterally by pl(|ice. 1-here is no substance in this petition, the same co^dingly it \s hereby dismissed at the admission Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge