IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 12TH JUNE 2009 / 22ND JYAISHTA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 73 of 2009(S) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.29265/2007 Dated 07/07/2008 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- L. PRIYAMVATHA, W/O.C.K. SANKAR, AGED 61 YEARS, RETIRED BRANCH MANAGER, PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD., NO.Q 390, PATHANAMTHITTA RESIDING AT KALPANA HOUSE, KODUMON.P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. MR.K.JAJU BABU RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS 3 AND 4 ---------------------------------- 1. SHRI.K.V. JACOB, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR/SECRETARY, KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE EMPLOYEES PENSION BOARD, TRIVANDRUM - 695 002. 2. SMT.K.R. VALSALADEVI, AGED AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER SECRETARY, PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICUTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD., NO. Q 390, PATHANAMTHITTA. R1 BY MR.P.V.MOHANAN,SC,K.ST.CO.OP.EMP.PENSION R2 BY ADVS. MR.V.G.ARUN MR.T.R.HARIKUMAR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Cont.Case(C).No.73 of 2009-S = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 12th day of June, 2009. JUDGMENT As of now, the matter relating to re-fixation of pay is pending before the Government. Therefore, if the Pension Board passes an order fixing pension subject to the decision of the Government regarding the fixation of pay, that should satisfy the issue of enforcement of the judgment dated 7.7.2008, to a great extent. Under such circumstances, this contempt of court case is closed leaving the Pension Board to issue an order revising the pension within one month from now. Such order would be provisional and subject to the fixation of pay by the Government. It is also clarified that the petitioner will be entitled to move afresh alleging contempt of the directions of the judgment, if it becomes necessary. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/170609