FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2897 OF 2009 [Shri. Jafar Babu Shaikh V/s.Shri. Abdul Bari Shaikh & anr.] ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court s orders : ’ or directions and Registrar s’ : Court s or Judge s orders ’ ’ orders : ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Mr. M.S. Karnik, adv.for petitioner. Shri. U.B. Nighot, adv.for respondent no.1. Shri. D.R. More, APP for State­respondent no.2. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 5th JANUARY, 2010. P.C :­ 1. The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Junnar below Exhibit­23 dated 12/10/2009. 2. Exhibit­23 was an application made by the petitioner­accused for recalling the order issuing process. 3. The order that has been passed on this application is inter­locutory order. Despite, both sides taking me through the case law in the field and also the principles laid down therein, I am of the opinion that the objection as to the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court can be raised even after the final orders in the subject complaint are passed. If the same is adverse to the petitioner, then, while challenging it he can raise all pleas including that the court of Judicial Magistrate First Class at Junnar, had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain and try the complaint. All contentions in that behalf of both sides are kept open. Petition dismissed. (JUDGE)