THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA CRIMINAL PETITION No.5849 OF 2009 ORDER: This Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioner Aravind Raj alias Raj – A-7 seeking to quash the proceedings against him in Crime No.23 of 2004 of Ghatkesar Police Station, Cyberabad, registered for the offences under Sections 366-A and 347 IPC. 2. Heard both sides and perused the material available on record. 3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with A-1 to A-6, kidnapped the daughters of the de facto complainant, Kum. Bhagavathi Bai and Kum. Saritha Bai aged 18 and 17 years respectively, at the point of knife and by threatening them with dire consequences, forced them to marry A-1 and A-2 respectively. 4. It is reported that after completion of the investigation, police laid charge sheet into the Court for the offences alleged against A-1 to A-5 after separating the case against A-6 and the petitioner (A- 7) showing them absconding and the same was taken on file as S.C. No.310 of 2005 by the learned V Additional District Judge, L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District and after trial, A-1 to A-5 were acquitted of the offences by judgment dated 12-06-2009. 5. Further a perusal of the record shows that the split up case against the petitioner is numbered as P.R.C. No.15 of 2009 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, East and North, L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District. However, copy of the judgment in S.C. No.310 of 2005 and the copy of the proceedings in P.R.C. No.15 of 2009 are not produced before this Court for perusal. 6. Further, from the contents of the petition, it appears that the police after discovering presence of the petitioner, as they are trying to arrest him, he filed this petition. 7. This petition is of 2009 and arrest of the petitioner and the proceedings against him in P.R.C. No.15 of 2009 were stayed till the end of Sankranthi Vacation of 2011 only. Thereafter, no steps were taken by the petitioner for extension of the said interim stay order which clearly shows the mala fide intention of the petitioner to stall the proceedings against him further in one way or the other. 8. In the circumstances, this Court is of the view that it is not a fit case for keeping the same pending further. 9. Therefore, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. __________________ B.N. RAO NALLA, J October 13, 2011. PV`