IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 23RD JANUARY 2009 / 3RD MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 885 of 2009(Y) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- ARIF AZEEZ, S/O.M.M. ABDUL AZEEZ, MANADATH, ZAINA GARDEN, AMBUNADU, EDATHALA P.O., ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRIC.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. DISTRICT REGIATRAR (GENERAL), ERNAKULAM. 2. P.A. KUNHU MOHAMMED, S/O. ABOOBACKER ALIAS AVUKKAR, PUTHEPURAYIL HOUSE, THOTTUMUKHAM KARA, ALUVA EAST VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 885 OF 2009 (E) ==================== Dated this the 23rd day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner's prayer is to direct the 1st respondent not to proceed with Ext.P3, the complaint. According to the learned Government Pleader, a complaint was raised by the 1st respondent and that enquiry under Section 83 of the Registration Act is now being conducted by the 1st respondent. 2. When a complaint disclosing certain allegations is received, it is only natural that enquiry is initiated to find out the truth of the matter. This precisely is what has been done by the 1st respondent. I do not find anything irregular in such an action and at any rate, this Court will not be justified in interfering in the matter, at this stage. I am not persuaded to entertain this writ petition. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp