dgm gm gm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.4127 OF 1997 PETITION NO.4127 OF 1997 PETITION NO.4127 OF 1997 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.Suna Bangwala for Mr.S.M.Gorwadkar for the respondents 1, 2 and 3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 15th October, 2008. : 15th October, 2008. : 15th October, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. The petitioner/tenant has challenged the grant of amendment application to the plaintiff/landlord in the year 1996. The petitioner/tenant has challenged that order and obtained ad-interim relief in terms of prayer (c). In the result, the Appeal proceedings itself is stayed. By this amendment, the landlord/plaintiff seeks to add in the description of the property. The suit is already decreed for possession of property on revocation of licence. The proposed amendment, therefore, would not change the nature of Suit. ( 2 ) In view of this, I see there is no reason to keep this matter pending. There is no perversity. The petition is accordingly dismissed. The Stay also stands vacated. [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]