1 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application No. 270/2009 in MCA St. No. 3450/2009 Laxman Sadashiv Deshpande..vs..Addl.Commissioner, Amravati & ors. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms. Joshi, Advocate for applicant. Mr. Sonak, A.G.P. for respondent no.1. Mr. Tajne, Advocate for respondent no.2 CORAM: S. A. BOBDE & F. M. REIS,JJ. DATED : 19 th June, 2009 1. Heard. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 96 days in filing application for restoration. Learned counsel for non applicant points out that the matter has been earlier dismissed in default on two occasions. However, Ms. Joshi, Advocate submits that this was due to the fact that earlier Advocate has expired and on the second occasion name of the deceased Advocate appeared in the list. In any case, earlier, the matter was restored by this Court on those two occasions. In the present case, learned counsel for the applicant accepts that she missed the matter and lost sight of it for considerable time. 3. In the circumstances, there appears to be sufficient cause and hence, the delay is hereby condoned. Application stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE kahale