IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11351 of 2010 RAM BAHADUR YADAV, SON OF LATE KANCHAN YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE –KUPAHA, P.S. GHOGHARDIHA, DISTT. MADHUBANI. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 30-04-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is a dealer under Public Distribution Scheme and has prayed for anticipatory bail on the ground that there is no evidence that 452 liters of kerosene oil seized from a co-accused were sold by this petitioner. It has further been submitted that Mukhiya has certified that there was no irregularity in the shop of petitioner and no consumer had raised any grievance. It has been highlighted that police found the case false against the petitioner and submitted final report but the Magistrate had differed with the same and has taken cognizance. Considering all the facts and circumstances, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. Let the petitioner namely, Ram Bahadur Yadav in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Ghoghardiha PS case No. 01/09 subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. BKS/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)