HiQH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR B'- PETiTIONER RESPQNDENTS PETITION (S) NQ.39Q4 of2_Q07 Set Ram Sao S/o Dhani Ram Sao, Aged about-48 years, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Higher Secondary Schooi, Kondatarla, Block-Pusour, District - Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1.8tate of Chhattisgarh, Through : The SecreSary, Schoo! Educatfon Department, D.K.S. Bhawan.Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director, Public instruction, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 4. The Principal, Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Kondataria, Btock-Pusour, Districi-Raigarh (C.G.) WRiT PETiTiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF Single Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Shri Sanjay Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate forthe respondents/State. (Passed on this 11m day of Ju!y, 2007) The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioner is entitled to reguiar pay scaie w.e.f. the date of Initiai appointmeni or from the date of completion of probation period. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner as well as for the respondents/State jointiy submit that the facts and question of iaw invoived in the present writ petition are the same to that of in VV.P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. Sfate Government of ehhattisgarh and others), whiSh was aiiowed vide order dated 7.11.2u06. In view of the above-stated submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms, subject to vertfication of the facts. No order as to oosts. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge 1