IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2007 / 4TH ASHADHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 780 of 2007(S) FROM THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.16793/2005 Dated 09/01/2007 PETITIONER P.MURALEEDHARAN, AGED 39, S/O.GOVINDA KURUP, PARAYIL HOUSE, KAKKATTIL POST, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.K.SIVAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: 1. NARAYANANKUTTY, THE COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS (ADMINISTRATION) DEPARTMENT, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE. 2. SUGUNAN, THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS, (ADMINISTRATION) DEPARTMENT, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. NARAYANAN, INSPECTOR, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS, (ADMINISTRATION) DEPARTMENT, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.R.SABU THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L. DATTU, C.J. & K.T. SANKARAN, J. ................................................................................... CONTEMPT CASE ( C)No. 780 OF 2007 ................................................................................... Dated this the 25th June, 2007 J U D G M E N T H.L. Dattu, C.J.: The only direction, issued by this court , to the first respondent herein, while disposing of Writ Petition No. 16793 of 2005 dated 9th January, 2007, was to permit the petitioners in the Writ Petition to take charge as non-hereditary trustees of Kunnummal Sree Bhagawati temple. Alleging that the respondents have disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this court, the complainant is before us in this Contempt case. 2. Government Pleader has taken notice for the respondents. 3. When the matter is posted before this court today, learned Senior Government Pleader Shri M.R. Sabu has produced before us, a communication received by him from the Commissioner of HR & CE (Admn.)Department, Kozhikode dated 22.06.2007. In that, it is stated that the respondents have cancelled the appointment of fit person and that he has been directed to hand over charge of all records and accounts etc., to the Chairman. 4. In view of the order of cancellation passed by the respondents CONTEMPT CASE ( C)No. 780 OF 2007 2 on 21.06.2007 and further direction to the fit person, who was appointed earlier by order dated 12.02.2007, to hand over charge of all records and accounts etc., to the Chairman, in our opinion, there is substantial compliance of the orders and directions issued by this court. Therefore, further proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act need not be taken up. Accordingly, the proceedings in this Contempt Case are dropped. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE. lk