1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.619 OF 2007 Sangeeta Vinod Chandodkar, .. Petitioner Vs State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents. Mr V.V.Gangurde, for the petitioner. Mr S.R.Borulkar, P.P. with Mr A.S.Gadkari, for the respondents. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. DATED : 20th JUNE, 2007 DATED : 20th JUNE, 2007 DATED : 20th JUNE, 2007 P.C.: 1. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr Borulkar, learned Public prosecutor for the respondent. 2. The petitioner is the wife of one Vinod Chandodkar. According to the petitioner, Vinod Chandodkar was in custody of the police in Wadala Police Station. According to her, Vinod Chandodkar died because of the injuries sustained by him because he was assaulted by the police while he was in custody of the police in Wadala police station. The case of the respondent, as stated by Mr Borulkar, learned Public Prosecutor, is that Vinod committed Suicide. At this stage, we do not want to go into the factual aspect because we are informed by the learned Public Prosecutor that the magisterial enquiry under section 176 of the Cr.P.C is in progress. We direct 2 2 2 the learned Magistrate to conclude it within a period of two weeks from today. Needless to say that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the report of the enquiry, she will be entitled to challenge it. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. . The Public Prosecutor to forward a copy of this order to the concerned Magistrate. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (SMT.RANJANA DESAI,J.)