IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10174 of 2011 1. Dr.S.M.Badrul Hasan S/O Late M.Shanshul Hassan At Present R/O Mohalla New Patliputra, P.S. - Patliputra, Distt. - Patna. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Home Secretary. 2. The District Magistrate, Patna. 3. B.D. Kartiken Dhanji, Subdivisional Officer, Danapur, Patna. 4. The Officer Incharge, Danapur Police Station, Danapur, Distt. - Patna. 5. Mdana Kumar Sinha, The Circle Officer, Danapur, Distt. - Patna. 6. Anil Kumar, Welfare Officer, Danapur, Patna. 7. Subodh Rai S/O Devendar Rai @ Nankut Pahalwan R/O Saguna Tadi Godam, P.O. & P.S. Danapur, Distt. - Patna. For the Petitioner : Md. Khurshid Alam, Advocate For the State : Mr. K.P. Gupta, SC 16 Mr. Binod Kumar, AC to SC 16 4 12.10.2011 The petitioner is permitted to implead the D.C.L.R., Danapur as party respondent no.8. The grievance of the petitioner is that a temple is being constructed on his raiyati land bearing Khata No.185, Plot No.16, Holding No.245/1&2 situated at Saguna More, Danapur in the district of Patna. It appears that despite two opportunities given to learned State counsel, no counter affidavit has been filed in this case and as such in the facts and circumstances of the case, I pass the following order: The petitioner would file a detail representation before the D.C.L.R., Danapur within a week raising his grievance that the temple in question is being constructed by Respondent nos.6 and 7 with the help of Respondent Nos.3 and 4. The D.C.L.R. will have measurement done in presence of both the parties within a further period of three weeks. In case on measurement it is found that the 2 temple is being constructed on the raiyati land of the petitioner, then he will take steps in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. KHAN (S. P. Singh, J.)