IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22449 of 2010 ARBIND KUMAR @ ARVIND KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 30.6.2010 This is an application for modification of order dated 8.2.2010 passed in Cr.Misc.No. 23886 of 2009. Considering the merit, petitioner was allowed interim bail on 16.9.2009 in Cr.Misc.No. 23886 of 2009 complying thereon he surrendered and released. Again on merit also bail to the petitioner was found justified but order to the effect that in the event of arrest or surrender, petitioner will be allowed bail on furnishing bail bond was passed. Really there was neither need of surrender nor need of furnishing any bail bond but petitioner found himself not suitable person to point out this fact/aspect to this Court and remained to continue on bail bond furnished on his behalf. In my view, a clarification should be sought by the trial court. Any how the above named petitioner is entitled for appropriate relief. He is allowed to continue on bail granted by 2 order dated 8.2.2010 passed in Cr.Misc.No. 23886 of 2009 and bail bond furnished by him be accepted as valid. The modification application is allowed. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)