IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 15TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 26TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 4775 of 2010(O) ------------------------- OS.154/2008 of IST ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT, NEYYATTINKARA .................... PETITIONER : ------------------ VIJAYADAS, S/O.CHRISTUDAS, DAIVAKRIPA, THADATHIKKULAM, KANJIRAMKULAM VILLAGE. BY ADV. MR.R.GOPAN RESPONDENTS : ---------------------- 1. ISSACK, KANJITHALAYAM, KANJIRAMKULAM VILLAGE, KANJIRAMKULAM.P.O. 2. JAYALATHA, KANJITHALAYAM, KANJIRAMKULAM VILLAGE, KANJIRAMKULAM.P.O. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JVT P. BHAVADASAN, J. =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= W.P.(C) No. 4775 of 2010 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= Dated this the 15th day of February, 2010 JUDGMENT In the light of the oder that I proposes to pass, notice need not be issued to the respondents. The petitioner seeks a direction to the court below to dispose of Ext.P7 application said to have been filed before the court below. 2. In a suit for injunction, the court below passed an interim order of injunction. The complaint of the petitioner is that violating the interim order of injunction, the respondents trespassed into the plaint schedule property and conducted wire cut bricks business in the plaint schedule property. The petitioner filed a commission application for reporting the above fact. It is pointed out that the application is being repeatedly posted and it is not being disposed of and that is causing serious injury and prejudice to the petitioner. 3. In the circumstances, there will be a direction to the First Addl. Munsiff's Court, Neyyattinkara to consider and dispose of Ext.P9 application as expeditiously as possible, at any W.P.(C) No. 4775/10 2 rate within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This writ petition is disposed of as above. P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE. mn.