^^.c© IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CC.G.I WRIT PETITION (S) N0. •c"3^ QF 2006 PETITIONER r..-"' ^' RESPONDENTS '-Dhaniram Baghel Son of Shri Balaram Baghel, aged about 36 years, Presently working as Assistant Grade-III, Janpad Panchayat Bhairamgarh, District South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.). VERSUS 1; State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Director, Tribal Development, Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Collector, South Bastar, Dantewada (C.G.). ^ ,1^^ .^.ity <y» ^; ^ rC°'' <v ^L^~.. ^ 4. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Raipur (C.G.). 5. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Bhairamgarh, District South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. r ^ S3 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Wnt PetitiDn(S)Np,5324Qf2W)6 Petitioner: Dhaiiirain Baghel Versus Respoudents; State of Chhattisgarh & ofhers SIn^e Bench: HonT)te Mr. Justice Satish K. AgnUiotri. Shri P. P. Sahu, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri Ajay Chnvedi, Panel lawyer for fhe Respondents No. 1 to 4. None for fhe respondent No.5. ORDER (4th October, 2006) The foUowing order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agailiotri, J. 1. According to leamed counsel for the petitioner, fhe petitioner who was employed as Assistaat Grade-III ia the oiSBce of fhe Janpad Panchayat Bhaiiacagarh, District- Soufh Bastar, Daatewada, was tcansferred to Goverument Higher Secondaiy School Konta vide order dated 7.7.W06 (Aiincsnire P/2). Leamcd counsel subniits that fhe petitioncr has been working in the nascalite infested area for fhe last 15 years. Accordingly fhe petitioner made a representation to fhe CoUector Soufh Baster, Dantcwada. The said representation was referred to the concemcd Minister i.e. the Chief Miiuster, State of Chhattisgarh. During the pendency of the representation the respondent No.5 vide oider dated 22.9.2006 (Annexure P/4) directed to fhe petitioner to handover fhe chaiy of the post, uiunediately and to proceed to fhe new place of postmg at Konta. ^ a 2. Leamed counsel for the petitioner subinits that fhe iinpi^ied orderdated 22.9.2006 be not giveueffectto tiU fhedisposalofthe representation pending before the ChicdF Minister. Leamcd coiuisel for the respondents/State has no objection to the subnussioias inade by the petitioner. 3. Having heard teamed counsel for fhe parties aad having regard to the lunited prayer inade by leamed counsel for fhe petitioner it is directed that in the event, the representation is pending consaleration before fhe ChiefMiaister, State ofChhattisgarh, tfae impugned order dated 22.9.2006 shafl remain stayed tiB the disposal ofthe pendiag representation. 4. With the above obsen/ation this inatter stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Thakur . Judge