IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 30 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 301 OF 2001 SHRI SHRIKANT V.GAONKAR ... Petitioner Versus MR. RAVI SITARAM NAIK, THE CHAIRMAN FOR GOA MEAT COMPLEX LTD., AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Ms. Aruna B. Sanadi, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 30th June, 2011 P.C. Heard Ms. Sanadi, learned Advocate for the petitioner. 2. This Contempt Petition is initiated for wilful disobedience of order passed by the Division Bench of this Court on 30.9.2010 in Writ Petition no. 301/2001 by which Writ Petition was allowed in terms of prayer clause(a). Prayer clause (a) reads thus:- "Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the Respondent/alleged contemnor no.1, 2 and 3 to pay retirement benefits due to the petitioner under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2000, immediately, with reasonable interest." 3. Perusal of the record discloses that pursuant to the demands made by the petitioner towards retirement benefits some amount has been paid to the petitioner and there is a dispute as to amount due to the petitioner. Hence there is no wilful disobedience on the part of respondent nos. 3 and 4 so as to warrant contempt proceedings against them. 4. There is absolutely no statement as to how respondent nos.1 and 2 are responsible for non compliance of the directions given by the Division Bench. 5. In view of above, Contempt Petition stands dismissed. Needless to mention that dismissal of this petition would not come in the way of the petitioner from filing appropriate proceedings. 6. Petition stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. vn