: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.30 OF 2009 In the matter of Article 226 of the Constitution of India etc. Shri Nihalasingh Ramkhilawan Singh & Ors. ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Dinesh Chamboowala for the Petitioner. Ms.S.M.Pandekar, A.G.P. for Respondent nos.1 to 3 - State. Mr.Clifford Martis, Senior Counsel for Respondent no.4. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, DATED : DATED : DATED : 9TH FEBRUARY, 2009 9TH FEBRUARY, 2009 9TH FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : Rule. Rule returnable forwith and heard. 2. The impugned order permits the society the Pride of Vakola (SRA) Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., to be impleaded in the Appeal. There is no objection to the same. 3. It is however contended that it is in fact not the society but certain vested interests who have no concern with the society or property who have sought : 2 : to intervene. 4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent no.4 states that the society has no objection to this aspect of the matter being kept open at the hearing of the Appeal. In other words, it would be open to the Petitioner to contend at the hearing of the Appeal that the society is not duly represented. 5. This issue, if raised, will be considered at the hearing of the Appeal. 6. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.