IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13416 of 2011 DHIRAJ KUMAR @ DHIRAJ KAMATI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 379 and 461 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation was of committing theft. The petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. The petitioner’s name sprang up on confession of Sumit Kumar who alleged that the petitioner purchased one stolen Soni Digital Camera. The alleged Camera was recovered from the village house of the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner is residing at Delhi and the recovery has been made from the village house which is joint family house. Moreover, the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is also submitted that Sumit Kumar has not alleged that the petitioner purchased the Camera which was the stolen article. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on 2 bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Katra P.S. Case No. 187 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)