IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.228 of 2008 PREM CHAND PRASAD, s/o Late Shyamanand Prasad, At:-Ramjee Chak, P.S.-Digha, P.O. Bata Ganj, Distt. Patna ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA through the Commissioner, Employees’ Provident Fund Organization, The Government of India, New Delhi. 2. The Regional Commissioner, Employees’Provident Fund Organization (Regional Office), Patna. 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Employees’Provident Fund Organization, (Regional Office), Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 4. 5.4.2010 No one appears. The grievances of the petitioner is for issuance of direction to the respondent-authorities to re-assess the pension issued vide P.P.O. No.BR/PAT/PENSION/05/1403 on 29th of September, 2005. Further direction is to pay the arrears of revised pension with interest. The prayer of the petitioner needs to be examined by the competent authority. As such, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation before the competent authority for redressal of his grievances as highlighted in this writ application. In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of eight weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in 2 his representation may be settled without further delay. In case the representation finds favour, the admitted dues may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)