C^\<f^t— U^) en IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTCSGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.rS)No. V3>l(r0 of 2011 ^' Dubey Lal Kurrey, S/o Shri Dwarika Prasad, aged about 52 years, headmaster (middle school) at 6ovt. Middle School (T.W.b.) PETTnQNER / ,. ^?^ ^^^yi ^'•"'""\'^}^i!p^': Jatasemer, Block Baikunthpur, ^^ ^"••""" ^ ^ Distt. Korea (C.G.). RESPONDENTS VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through-The Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Mantrallaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.6.) -2. Assistant commissioner, Tn'bal Welfare, Department, Distt.- Korea (Baikdnthpur) (C.&.) "3. Block Education Officer, Block Baikunthpur, bistt. Korea (C.6.) < WRIT PETCTCON UNbER ARTCCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INOIA FQR_^SSUANCE OF WRIT OR MANbAMUS/bIRECTCON OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. ; ^TT^T^T f<wli°h ^T8n STT^T sti^ic^ ^WW ^W^) '75ET ^t^lcri-M, ^Tli'M^Ko, fsi<rtl-M^< -^..te.:p:.(S.1AJO..:..s'..C^..LnTP^200 ^TT^T "(T?RT ((ic<^<sl<^) ^pnw^f^T 3?T^r SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Moh cr)i^?<n<flTi T=nwff '^*1^rt <^l^t< ^'3tRW3TT^T an Shrivastava. J. 21-06-2011 Shri Somkant Verma, counjsel on behalf of Shri A.S. Rajput, counsei for the petitioner. Shri N.Naha Roy, Panei La\|vyer for the State. With the consent of learned! counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. The petitioner was appoi hted on a fixed pay of Rs.150/-. After successfuiiy compieting the prob^tion period of 2 years, he was granted regularpayscale. Learned counsei appearin^ for the petitioner submits that the issue Involved in the case is as to whefier, the petitioner is entitled to reguiar pay scaie with effect from the date oi probation period. The issue involved hereinl the date of initiai appointment. Supreme Court in specia! Leave Ff Tribunal to the effect that the T| reguiar pay scaie from the date of| Learned counsei appearin| initiai appointment or after completion of was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunai, Jab^ipur in O.A.No.2745/89 {Madhukant Yadu and 5B others v. Stateof M.l^. & others), wherein; it was held that the simiiariy situated teachers are erjtitied to regular pay scaie with effect from The matter was taken up to the Hon'bie et'rtion (Civit) No.6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'bfe SL<preme Court, uphoEding the decision of the ?achers/Assistant Teachers are entitied to initiai appointment. \S for the petitioner further submits that this Court, whiie considering thesam^ issue in Amar Sai Ram & Oihers v. State •:^^s% ?' XI-HC—78 ^^^ ^i^ '^n 3?n^T s»)*ii<^ ^ DyeplE ^y ^jy <fP^(T W*11«2K ^S? ^l<41<yi^, ^til^Ko, f®!<ril<!-l^< .l^...?..fer)...K^.;^J..ff'D.2-lL 200 a^TT^^(^f^sr) ^wtW ^fta ^T^f -?— of Chhattisgarh & Others [W.P.(S) aliowed the petitioners to make a r| raising ali their grievances. Accordingly, the petitioner is] raising ail his grievances, in iight of] 27/12/2008, and in turn, the conce| representation, if any, in accordance three months from the date of receip^ ofthefacts. in view ofthe foregoing, thls p^tition is disposed of. '^raf^^T^ t?W^Tf ^ f^T^'tf^R?K ^T3^ir<S7^T No.4725/2006] by order dated 01/09/2006, epresentation within a period of ten aays, granted liberty to make a representation the aforesaid judgment and circuiar dated med respondent is directed to decide the A/ith iaw, on its own merits, within a period of of the representatbn, subject to verification »-»»ss>-" ^'