1 mp t IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3110 of 2008 Shri Siddhivinayak (Kandivli) SRA co-op Housing Society Ltd. .. Petitioner versus Leelaben B. Pradhan @ Leela Vesta Dhodi & ors. .. Respondents ... Mr.A.Y. Sakhare Sr.Counsel i/b D.H. Mehta for the petitioner. Mr. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 5th September 2008 P.C.: 1. Having regard to the nature of relief claimed in the chamber summons, the argument of petitioner before this court that the trial court has failed to consider prayer clause (b) for grant of interim relief as prayed for by the petitioner-third 2 party is misplaced. This is so because the relief claimed in the chamber summons in terms of prayer clause (b) was of limited nature to operate during the pendency of the said chamber summons. 2. It is not in dispute that the chamber summons stands finally disposed off in terms of the impugned order. In that case, there was no question of considering the prayer for grant of interim relief beyond the date of the order. If the petitioner so desires may be free to apply for the appropriate relief as may be advised which application will be decided on its own merits. 3. All questions in that behalf are left open to be decided on its own merits in accordance with law. 4. Petition disposed off with the above observations. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)