IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7529 of 2009 Date of Decision: May 25, 2011 Sukhwinder Singh & another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Anurag Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Attariwala, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent No.1. Mr. Ashok Singla, Advocate, for respondent No.2. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that so as to frustrate the rights of the petitioners, District Revenue Officer, Sangrur, has passed an order, also adverse to the rights of the petitioners. The order also needs to be challenged and therefore, this petition may be dismissed as withdrawn to enable the petitioners to file a fresh petition. CWP No.7529 of 2009 [2] 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition, at a later stage in case it is so required. 3. If so advised, the petitioners would have the right to challenge the order passed by the District Revenue Officer in appeal, in case the appeal is filed within a period of 15 days of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. Learned counsel for the private respondent contends that the respondent would have no objection in regard to limitation. (AJAI LAMBA) May 25, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?