^^S^^^"fs¥S&s^ ^^:^^^^S :°^^^^;i^'''^^@^l^?..^?^^^^^B;^^;^%?^^|^|^^^^ ^J^'i^M^^B%(;%^^^%JIil|j^tiS^SS^^^S t^^^r^/e' ^ IN THE M.P. STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TBtaiJNAL AT ORIGINALAPPUCATIONNo. W^ of 1998 Applicant : ResfTarfilal Satyam Aged about 33 years Son of Shri Top Singh Resident ofVillage Jallikhurd Post - Doda, Thana - Kunda Tah.- Mungeli Distt. Bilaspur (M.P.) (Ex-Mansevi Sahayak Shikchhak, previously appointed on due selection and eligibilities against the vacant post of Asstt. Teachers, under the Edn. Deptt. of Govt. of M.P.) &.. VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS/ : (1) StateofM.R RESPONDENTS Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) (2) Commissioner of Public Instructions, Govt. of M.R, Education Deptt., Directorate of Public Instructions, (DPI Office), Near Chetak Bridge, Bhopal fM.P.) (3) Deputy Director of Public Instructions Govt. of M.R, Education Deptt. Education Distt. Bilaspur, P.0. Bilaspur (M.P.) (4) Block Education Officer Govt. of M.R, Education Deptt. P.0. Munaeli. Tah. Munaeli, •* Distt. Bilaspur (M.P.) ApgJication under section 19oftheAdministrativeTribunalAct 1985 (No.13 of 1985) readwithArticles 14. 16, .Sl_& 311 of the Constitution of India. considered with Principles of Natural and Social Justice. PARTICULARS OF APPLICATION 1. Particulars of Applicant : As in CauseTitle. g. Particulars of Non - Applicant : As in Cause Title. 3. Particulars of the Orders aaainst which the apDlication is made: The Applicant is not aggrieved by any particular orders but is aggrieved by the action of the Non-Applicants/Respondents, in not considering the demand of Justice in the case ofthe Applicant, by reinstatement/re-appointment and regularisation as Asstt. Teascher on the regular scale of pay and changing the Education Policies every now & then and violating the Mandatory Provisions of Articles 14, 16, 21 and 311 of the Constitution of India and also the Principles of Natural and Social Justice, Equity and Fair Play in Administrafion and abusing their powers in the matter of public employment. ....2 K-! r^.°, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. WRIT PETITION (Sl N0. 2552 OF 2005 Petitioner Respondents versus Reshamlal Satyam State of M.P. and others Present : Mr. Alok Nigam, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. (Passed on 31SI of July, 2006) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur by order dated 2.3.1998 passed in OA.No. 888/1997, has granted relief to the simiiarly situated applicants, in view of that the petitioner wants to make a representation to the State/authorities for considering his case. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents has no objection. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to make a representation ifso advised. No order as to costs. ^'^^ G^^