THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No. 18642 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner was appointed as T.B. Health Visitor under a programme entitled “RNTCP”, on 26-01-2005. He was posted to work at Piduguralla. The District T.B. Control Officer, the 1st respondent herein, transferred the petitioner to Guntur, vide proceedings dated 19-01-2008. The petitioner states that he sought time to join at that place, and thereafter, when he reported to duty, the 1st respondent refused to take him into service. This writ petition is filed with a prayer to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as T.B. Health Visitor at Piduguralla. The 1st respondent filed a counter-affidavit. It is stated that the petitioner was engaged by an outsourcing agency, viz., S.M. Manpower Consultancy, and thereafter, he was engaged by M/s Sreeja Infotech. The 1st respondent states that the petitioner worked up to 31-01-2008 at Piduguralla and absconded from work with effect from 01-02-2008. She denies any contractual, or any relationship of employer and employee between the petitioner and the respondents. Heard Sri M.R. Tagore, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Medical and Health. The programme was launched under a special scheme. The petitioner does not deny that he was engaged by an outsourcing agency, to work under the scheme. The order passed by the 1st respondent is as a sequel to the placing of the petitioner, by the outsourcing agency. The respondents did not appoint or otherwise engage the petitioner on their accord. The petitioner was transferred from Piduguralla to Guntur, vide proceedings dated 19-01-2008. He does not deny, that he did not report to duty at Guntur. The prayer in the writ petition is, to direct the respondents to continue him at Piduguralla. It only shows that the petitioner is not inclined to work at any other place. Obviously to cover up his lapses and indiscipline, the petitioner made baseless, irresponsive and unfounded allegations against the 1st respondent. This Court does not find any basis to grant relief to the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.27-10-2010. KO