IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7970 of 2011 SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL KUMAR THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.3.2011 Heard. Some of the facts are borne out from the record of the case that after examination of five witnesses a petition for summoning some additional accused under Section 319 Cr. P.C. was filed and, accordingly, an order to the above effect was passed. on 26.8.2002. Proceedings challenging that order under Section 397 Cr. P.C. were taken up and, ultimately, the persons who were summoned as additional accused were admitted to anticipatory bail. The petitioner, in the meantime, getting no progress in his trial absented himself on 21.1.2006 while the proceedings of various accused were pending demission on 319 Cr. P.C. before this Court. The contention is that as soon as the petitioner came to know that now in the present case he was required to appear, he himself surrendered to the judicial custody on 3..12.2010 and made a prayer for being released on bail which prayer has been dismissed on 22.2.2011. Regard being had k to the above noted facts and considering that the petitioner had himself surrendered to the custody of the court, let him, namely, Sunil Kumar alias Sunil Kumar Thakur be directed to be released on furnishing a bond of Rs. 5,000/-( five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount 2 each to the satisfaction of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in Bahadurpur P.S.Case No. 53 of 2001. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)