:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 658 OF 2005 Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited and anr. .. Appellants Vs. Mr. Mukul G. Vora .. Respondent Ms. S.I. Shah for appellats. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. Date : October 03, 2005. Date : October 03, 2005. Date : October 03, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. It is shocking to note that this appeal was filed on 10/11/1992 against an order dated 10/7/1992 passed by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court at Mumbai. As the appeal was beyond time, delay condonation application came to be allowed by this court for the first time on 6/5/2005 i.e. almost after 13 years. 2. By the impugned order the trial court has observed that the plaintiff son’s telephone could not be disconnected on account of nonpayment of telephone bills by the father in respect of telephone no.6492508 :2: which was standing in the name of the father and the trial court, therefore, directed to reconnect the telephone standing in the name of the son. 3. No interference is called for in the impugned order which has operated for more than 13 years by now. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)