IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.52 of 2005 SINGHESHWAR PRASAD SAO, Ex. Bundling Department General, The Bihar Co-operative Weavers Spinning Mill, national Textiles Corporation Unit, Mokama, Panta, son of Kishani Sao, Resident of village – Fulaiya, P.O.- Mahashaurha, P.S.-Via-Sirari, Luckheesarai, District-Luckheesarai, Bihar. Versus 1. THE REG.COMMISSIONER OF PROVIDENT FUND (PENSION) R Block Road No.6, Bihar, Patna. 2. The General Manager, Bihar Co-operative Weavers Spinning Mill Unit Mokama, P.O. & P.S.-Mokama, District-Patna. 3. The Branch Manger, Punjab National Bank, Main Road, Mokama, P.O. & P.S.-Mokama, District- Patna. ----------- 4 20.11.2009 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. R.S. Pradhan, learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Provident Fund Department. The writ petitioner had filed the present writ petition for making payment of revised pension with effect from 16.11.1995 together with interest. During the pendency of the writ application a counter affidavit was filed on behalf of the Provident Fund Department through the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Incharge of Legal Cell. In paragraph 6 thereof it has been mentioned that the monthly pension of the - 2 - petitioner has now been revised at the rate of 600/- per month with effect from 8.9.2000 vide revised pension payment order dated 11.1.2005, copy of which has been placed at Annexure-A to the counter affidavit. In paragraph 7 of the said affidavit it is stated that the revised pension payment order along with the differential amount of pension arrear amounting to Rs. 15,323/- has been forwarded to the Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Mokama for disbursement of the same to the petitioner. The petitioner has filed rejoinder in which he disputes the calculation made regarding pension of the petitioner and its revision. The matter has been pending in this Court since 5 years and no fruitful purpose is served in keeping this matter pending. In that view of the matter this writ petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation if so advised, before the respondent No.1, the Regional Commissioner of Provident Fund within four weeks from today and bring out the infirmities in the refixation of his pension - 3 - and which shall be considered and disposed of by the Regional Commissioner of Provident Fund by a speaking order dealing with the issues raised by the petitioner and if the petitioner has been able to make out a case for any further revision and for payment of arrears, the same should be paid to him. The said exercise should be carried out within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of any such representation. This writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid directions. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J. )