IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.3593 of 1992. SUIT NO.3593 of 1992. SUIT NO.3593 of 1992. Modi Peripherals Pvt. Ltd. ..Plaintiffs versus Chattisgarh Computer Syndicate and others ..Defendants Mr.Anup Sharma for the Plaintiffs Mr.Lokhandwala for the Defendant No.2 CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 21st Oct., 2008. DATED : 21st Oct., 2008. DATED : 21st Oct., 2008. P.C. 1. Nothing is placed before the Court to show that the suit summons is served upon the defendant Nos.1 and 2. The suit is required to be dismissed for want of prosecution so far as defendant Nos.1 and 2 are concerned. 2. Learned Advocate for the plaintiffs informs the Court that the plaintiffs have not contacted their attorney for last many days. The learned Advocate for the plaintiffs submitted that the attorney would like to apply for discharge. This request is coming before the Court only after the matter is posted for dismissal. The record shows that the plaintiffs are not interested in -2- prosecuting the suit. Suit is required to be dismissed so far as defendant No.3 is concerned. Hence the Order. ORDER i. Suit is dismissed against the defendant Nos.1 and 2 for want of service of Writ of Summons. There shall be no order as to costs. ii. Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution so far as defendant No.3 is concerned. There shall be no order as to costs. (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.)