CL^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OP CjlHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTTPETmON ( S) No. $$^V Of 2009 PETITIONERS: ^ ^ ^ ^/^y ^M°? ^- 4. Brinda Lal Netam S/o Shri Side Ram Netani , aged about 52 years, by caste Gond, occupation- F>rincipal, Govemraent Higher Secondaiy School , Lendara, Block Narharpur , Distaict Kanker , R/o Jhluiiyapara, Kanker (CG). Sewa Singh Nag S/o Shri Chamaroo Rara Nag , aged about 56 years, by caste Gond, occupation- Principal, Goveminent High School (Girls) , Abhanpur , Block & Tehsil Narharpur , District Kanker , R/o Mudpar, Post Sarona , Tehsil Narharpur Distriet, Kanker (GG). Smt. Gaya. Dfaruwa S7o Late Shri Ghanshyain Dhruwai , aged about 56 years, by caste Gond, oecUpation- Vice Principal, Goveminent Narhardev Higher Secondary School , Kanker , R/o Muharbandpara , Civil Line, Quarter No. A/4, Kanker (CG). Ramnath Gadpayle S/o Late Shri Mahadeo Gadpayle , aged about 57 years, occupation- Lecturer , Goveminent Narhardev Hi^ier Secondary School, Kanker , District Kanker , R/o Bazarpara Charama , District Kanker (CG). Gokul Ram Markam S/o Late Shri Ayatoo Raaa Markam , aged about 56 years, by caste ©ond, occupation; Lecturer , Govemment NarhardevHigher Secondary School, Kanker , District North Bastar Kanker , R/o VSlage and Post Shamtara, Tefasy Narharpur Dista-ict North Bastar , Kaaker (CG).' :^&i'- -^:^:^' -^1^^^^/"^ RESPONDENTS: Versys 1 The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Departinent, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). ^^_ 2. The Coinmissioner, Tribal Wetfare Department, University Campus, Raipur (CG). 3. Assistant Cominissioner, Tribal WeUare Department, ^-Kanker (CG) 4. The Director Treasury, Accounts and ^yfension, Raipiir (CG). 5. The Joinfr Director, Treasury, Accoi-ults and Pension, Kaaker (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 t ^ < HIGH COURTOFCHHATTIS6ARH: BILASPUR WRITPETITION (Sl N0.5671/2009 PETITIONERS Brinda Lal Netamandodiers RESPONDENTS Versus State ofChhatti^artiand Qthers (Writ Petition under Articte226ofthe Constitution of India) Sinale Bench: Hon'ble ShriSatish K. Aanihotri. *). Present: - Shri Rakesh Anthony.counsel for the petitioners. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate with Ms. Sunifa Jaln, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on this 6 day of October, 2009) With the consent of teamed counsel for the parties, fte matter is taken upfor hearingfinally. (2) Leamed counsel appearing fordie peBtionefs sutMnjts "that theissue involved in this petition is no longer res mtegra.as ttie same has been decided bythis Court on 27-03-20081nthematter of NankiRam Sidar vs. StateOfChhattisgarh&Others(W.P.No.6027QOO%.Thus,inviewofthe setUed posiUon, this petitfon deserves to tee alkwed in ttie same terms. iTtlmane! (3) Leamed counsel appearing for e State does not controvert the submissfon made bythe counsel forttie petUioners. (4) Accordingly, this petitton is allowed in the terms oftheorder dated 27-03-20CB passed bythis Court in the matter <rf Naitlfl Ram Sidar (Supra) and the petitioners are entitled to benefits ofthe Rute 22-D (rfthe M.P. Fundamental Rules, subject to verificafon offacts. No order asto costs. ^sd/-. .. 1. SatishK.A^naiotti Judge r ;-M