IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 29TH MAY 2008 / 8TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 15523 of 2008(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ JOJI EDATTEL, EDATTEL HOUSE, KALLOORKAD PO., MOOVATTUPUZHA BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRTANSPORT AUTHORITY, MUVATTUPUZHA, REP., BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MUVATUPUZHA. 3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI , REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 4. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TYRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI K.V.MANOJKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 15523 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: MAY 29, 2008 JUDGMENT Rejection of concurrence by Ext.P1 was called in question in a revision filed before the STAT and that was rejected by Ext.P4. Exts.P1 and P4 are challenged in this writ petition. 2. Two contentions are raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner: (1) that the Complete Exclusion Scheme provides for exception irrespective of the issuance of the draft notification dated 9.5.2007 and (2) that the overlapping is inevitable and has to be allowed. I do not find that any of the above contentions were raised before the Tribunal while dealing with Ext.P2 revision. 3. Therefore, I do not find it proper for this court to entertain these questions which are questions of fact as well. Writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-