IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.LAKSHMANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 826 of 2002 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 19/03/2002 in WP NO : 1599 OF 1992 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 The Regional Manager, Regional Office, Region-I, State Bank of India, Tirupathi. 2 The Personal Officer, Personal Department, Regional Office, State Bank of India, Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist. 3 The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Cumbum, Prakasam District. ..... APPELLANTS AND Shaik Mahaboob Ali, S/o.Peda Moulali, R/o. Ardhaveedi, Prakasham Dist. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellants: MR.K.SRINIVASA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent : MRSYED SHAREEF AHMED The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: ( Per the Hon’ble Smt Justice T.Meena Kumari) When this matter is taken up for hearing, it is brought to notice of this Court by the learned counsel for the appellants that the issue involved in this appeal is squarely covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.448 of 2003 dated 18-03-2003. Recording the same, the writ appeal is allowed in terms of the judgment passed in W.A.No.448 of 2003 dated 18.03.2003 setting aside the order of the learned single Judge. Consequently, the writ petition filed by the respondent herein is dismissed. ____________________ T.MEENA KUMARI, J _________________________ P.LAKSHMANA REDDY, J 22.06.2005 rkk Copy to 1 The Regional Manager, Regional Office, Region-I, State Bank of India, Tirupathi. 2 The Personal Officer, Personal Department, Regional Office, State Bank of India, Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist. 3 The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Cumbum, Prakasam District. 4. Two CD copies.