IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 28TH AUGUST 2009 / 6TH BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 25250 of 2009(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- T.U.RAJKUMAR, AGED 25 YEARS S/O.UNNI THEKKAN, THALATHULLY HOUSE MADAYIKUNNAM, THRISSUR, KERALA. BY ADV. SRI.FRANCIS JOSEPH KURISINKAL RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT. 2. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT. BY SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN - STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No.25250 of 2009 --------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of August, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner was a student of Dr.John Mathew Centre, Aranattukara for MBA Degree. The college is affiliated to the University of Calicut. The petitioner has completed his course in 2007. He was successful in all the semesters, except two papers in the 1st Semester Examination. Apparently, dissatisfied with the marks obtained by him, he had applied for revaluation. He is aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to publish the result of the revaluation sought for by the petitioner in relation to the 1st semester Examination of MBA, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks W.P.(C)No.25250 of 2009 :: 2 :: from the date of the application for revaluation, provided the application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct. Sd/- (V.GIRI) Judge sk/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge