IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2011 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 13692 of 2006(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- T.INDIRA, W/O.CHANDRASEKHARAN, "KARTHIKA", KAVU-VATTOM, CHERPLACHERRY (PO), OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, UPPER DIVISION CLERK, DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION, SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, OTTAPALAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION, PALAKKAD. R1 TO 3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SANDESH RAJA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VK S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No.13692 of 2006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of March, 2011 J U D G M E N T The counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition by filing a memo. The section points out that the counsel had already relinquished the vakalath by filing a memo and doubts whether the counsel can file a memo withdrawing the writ petition. The counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the memo relinquishing vakalath also. The counsel for the petitioner now produces before me a letter received by him from the petitioner instructing the counsel to withdraw the writ petition. Acting on the same, I dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn. Sd/- S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE //True copy// P.A. TO JUDGE shg/