IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 7349 of 2008. Decided on: 02.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Tikam Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. B.C. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Petitioner had got his name registered with the Employment Exchange. The respondent-department has sent requisition to supply the names of candidates to fill-up the posts of daily wage Beldar. According to the petitioner, he received call letter after interview was over. He served legal notice on the respondents on 6th March, 2000. However, the fact of the matter is that the petitioner was also interviewed subsequently on 27.3.2000 by giving him special chance, but he was not found suitable. The petitioner had only right to be considered and not to be selected. The right to be considered was given to him by giving him special chance. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 02, 2010. (sck).