^ c^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) W.P. fS) No. 3fc6 & /2011 PETITIONER(S) ^ ^ ^^f ^^ /^.- ./yv/s-)<V'" 4('^y ..-•''c^'f^ ^'' .••"' ^ (1)' Kalim Rijvi, S/o. S. A. Bari, aged about 59 years, C/o. Ainin Cycle Store, Kachahari Chowk, Dh&mtiuii 'f Dhamtari, Distt.^^^(C.G.) (2) Taturain Nirmalkar, S/o. Sukhlal, aged about 53 years, R/o. Nayapara Ward, Bajrang, Dha/nt^ini; Chowk, Dhamtari, Distt._j^pw (C.G.) VERSUS (1) State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Department of General Administration, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) Municipal Council Dhamtari, through ChiefMunicipal.QfScer, DhanfeW &?• Dhamtari, Distt.-^aipw (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA s'-'0 .^•" ^" RESPONDENTS 'sl, "^-'-^' .^' AS^ !'(»• HIOHCOURT OF CHHATMSeARH AT BILA8PUR SB :HON'BLE MR. JUSTIC®PRITUtlffiR DIWAKBR W.P.tSI.MO. 3668/2011 PBTOTIOHBI® RBSPOMDBKTs vensua Kalia Rijvi & Axiother State c£ChhattfagaTh aaother Shd Vinod Deshxniikh, couasel for fhe petitionas. Shri Chandresh Stawastava, P.L. forthe State/resp. No.l. ShriYashwaat SmghThakur, Dy. A.O. forTeap. No.2. WMT PB33TIONJUNDBR ARTICLB 226 OF TKE CONSnTOTIOII OPntDIA ORDBR (ll.07.i2011) Grievance of fhe petitioner in ttie piesent petition is fhat fhough fhe petitioners are entitled for thcir regularization on tiie post of Puinp Attendant but till date the order Itas not bcen passcd by the respondents even ^nonng fhe cucular of the govermaeat dated 5.3.08. Counsel for fhe petitioners submits that earBer fhey had fited a writ petition before ttais Court vide W.P.(S) No. 2918/09 (Aimesmn P/6) and in the saaae fhe opportuiuly was sought to make a represcntation before fhe conipetent authorily but desirfte tfae representation bcfa^ naade by fhe petitioncrs fhc saiae has not been decided and even the contempt petition filed by thc petitioners has not been entertained. He submits that fhe respondcnte bc directed to decide fhe represeutation of fhe petitioner withia soine time ficatBe aad the petitioners wouM. be permitted to snbiut all fhe relevant documents before ftie respondent No.2. Considering the facts and cia3uinstaaces of the casc, if the petitioner makes aay represenlation before the resp. No.2 withiu a period of 15 days fipom today along with aU thc docunaents, fhe »esp. •ffl ff No.2 ahaU decide fhe same in an objective manner •wlthia a further period offour moaths. It is made clear that fhis Court has not expresscd aay opiiuon on laerits offhe case aad the resp. No.2 would be at liberty to decide the repTesentation if so inade, in aocordance wifh. law. With the above observatfon, fhe petition stands disposed af. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge