l 88 CivilRcvisionNo483 of2009 1 0e1 1 IN 11IE I 11G11 COlJR1 OV PlJNJA13 c0 I IARYANA AT CIIANDIGARlI CivilRevisionNo483 of2009 Dccidcd Oil 22010 W r 0 Kuldccp SinghaildanotllCr PclitiollClSe 3 I t5 Vcrsus I Z Statcof Punjab andotIlcrs C4 CORAMIION13U11MR JUSTICK KeCePlJRl I otl Prcscntl Mr Asllok SinglaAdvocatc for thcpctilioncr 7 Z Mr SudhirNchra AddlGPunjabfor Nos I 2 Mr 1S2at1u Advocatcfor thc No Om ICCPURlJe This is a rcvision pctilionprcfcrrcdby lhc ordcr datcd 21 2008 passcdby Miss Kaur Cillil Jtldgcounior Sahib andordcrdatcdl2009 passcd bylcarncdAdditionalDistrict Judgc Sahib for scltingasidc thc saidordcrsand to allowan undcr Ordcr 39 Rulcs 1 and 20fthc Codc of Civil Prtlccdurc in shorl lhc CPC l Illcd by thc pcliliIIncrs lll thcir suil rcstlaining thcGram from inslallillg watci suloply tubc Singh Gagan Preet 2012.12.20 17: 43 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 89 3 Civil Rcvision No1483 of2009 2 p d wcll and froln miiking olllcr consllIclions for watcr Slipjllyin thc lalld in as thc samc has bccn rcscrvcd for gairllllllllkin publicIatrincS SlIlCC the consolidation and lS rccordcd as such in thc rcvenuc rccords including SlllCC thc consolidation 1c 19559 and SlllCC thcn the saiclland is bcinguscd 2il lllc spotas gairmuinkiilIatrirlcs 1 1 bythe petitioncrs and thcir fanlilics and also by othcr villagcrs and lhc 0 Gram hasno righllo changc theuscoflhc saiclland as C lt 1Sthc Iandof thc proprictors of thcvillagcincludiilg l2 jlctitilcrsancl I C5 WaS rcscrvcd in thc consolidation schcincfoi thcir conlinon usc and thc Cllllrc villagcis higlllyinlcrcstcd in lhc said coinmon tisc aild lhcyiilstitutcd Z lhe suit for pcrmallcntinjunctlOll Ill thc undcrOrdcr Q 1 Rulc 8 CPC but thc lcamcd Irial Courl has wroilglydismisscdtllc applicatl undci Ordcr 39 Rules l and 2 CPC whcrcasthcI7iIIIlellalc 08 Court has wronglypasscdtlc ordcr in appcalas dismisscdas wilhdrawn ClO withoulfollowinglllc of Ordcr I Rulc 819CPC Ivhich clcarly 7 Z crcatcs a llai Itlr of such Willloutfollowing due proccdurc Oll llolicc dcfcndanls aild Oled scparatcwrl ltcn slatcmcntsalld rcpllcsto thestay and look up lcgal objcclions of conccaIincIllof lruc and matciial facls clcall handscausc ofaction and locusslandi and cstoppcl On mcrits it was statcd lhat thc plaintiffs arc noli rcsidcilccof villagcKotla i3adla Il was stalcd thal at Ihc limc of consolidation01 holdings thc propcrtyin qucstion VCslcd in thc Clram SlllCClhcn lhc Clram lancllayal IS managlnglllc tiIlliirs f thc suit Its e 1 r 1 Singh Gagan Preet 2012.12.20 17: 43 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 90 3 Civil RcvisionNo 14830f 2009 2 1 r1 Ivcll and f1om inikillgolhcr conslruclitllls l11walCt Slljllllyin lllc laild Ill qucstlOll as lhc samc has bccn rcscrvcdfor gairmumkinpubliclalrincs sincc lhc consoliciationand is rccordcclas such iil tllc rcvciluc rccoids including SlllCC thcconsolidalion i c 195859 and SlllCC thcn thc said land is bcinguscd al lhc spotas gairmuillkill lllliillcs m by lhc pelilioncrsand thcir Iamilicsand also by olllcr villagcrs and thc 0 Gram hasno rightlo changc thc usc of lhc said land as tillilnalcl7 0 it is thc land of tllc of thcvillagcincluding lllc pctitioners and I C was TCSCrvcdill lllc constllidalion schcillc for tllcir CotlltllcJil lisc alld tlle I cnlirc villagcis hilhlyintcrcslcd ill lllc sald common usc iItlI tllcl institutcd Z lhc suil for pcrmatlcnt iil thc capacily undcrOrdcr r 1 Rule 8 CPC bul lhc lcarncd lrial Courl has wronglydismisscdlhc Cr I application undcr 9rdcr39 Rulcs l and 2 CPC whcrcis tlle liiesl Ajlpcllil 08 Court has Ivronglypassed thc ordci In appcal as dismisscdas willldraWll CO wilhoutfollowing lllC PlOVlSlOllSof Ordcr 1 Rulc 81 CPC which clcarly 7 Z crcates a bar for of such wilhout following duc Qm proccdurc 4 Oil n0licc dcfcndanlsappearcdand fllcd scparalcWrlttcn statcmcntsand rcpIicsto lhc slayapplicatioll and lOlOkup 01 conccalincnlof lruc and inalcrial facls clcan handscause ofaction and Iocusstandi and cstoppcl On mcrits lt was statcdlhat thc plaintiffs arc not rcsidcilccof villagcKotla I3adla It was slalcd thal at thc limc of consolidalion of holdings thc propcrlyin qucslionvcslcd in thc Gram sincc lhcn thc Gram is inatlaging lhc ollairs oflhc suit propertybcingIlS Singh Gagan Preet 2012.12.20 17: 43 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 91 Civil Rcvision No 1483of2009 3 1 1 J truc OWllCre Tllc propertywas ncvcr uscd for lhc call of naturc Thc samc is Iyingvacalll andthcGram is usinglhe samc for thc commonpurposcsofthc villageIl is stalcdbcingowncrof thcsuil propcrly Gram wants to conslrucl lhc walcr lank for lhc purposc0 witler supplylo lhc gcncralpublic thc Clovcrntncnlhasalrcady issllcd grantIor 1 C thc purposeofconstructionof walcr lank Thc plainti ffs want lo cncroach 0 uponsomc part oflhc suit propcrlyIlyplacing cow duilgcalLS lllallllrC Plts C40 and lhc Clram Hants lo rcmoVC thc salnc Thcrcforc lo rcslralil I C5 lhc Graln PanchavalIhis suit was OIcd with mala fldc intcntionll has X furthcilbecil allcgcdlhat suil Ioropcrty was uscd for thc wcl farc o f thc Z gcncralpulolic as a wholcand on lhc lonl sidc 01lhc suil landaflcI cltssing W C thc road lhcrc iS a hllildingof Gurdwarasahib and lhc suit prtlpcrlyIS I suitablcand POpCr placcfor installatioilof walcr tailk Thc olllcr llropcrly c8 lo lhc Gram is ahout2 klns awayfrom thcvillagcand 4 3 ll would 1c diIllcull for thc lo install pipcfol 2 Z kms olhcr avcnncnls thcypraycdor dlslnissalof Ihc inlcrim Q injunction Aflcr hcaring bolhtIIecounscl for lhe particslheIcarncdCivil JudgcouniorDivisionl Sahib disinissccllhc said vidc ordcr datcd 212008 ailtl lhc IcarncclAdditional lOistrictJudgc Sahib vidc ordcr datcd 2009011 all appcalpreferrcdbythc but lal er on plainti gol thc said appcal dismisscdas Ivithdrawil 1lOWcvcr fcclingdissatisOcd witll lhc aforcsaidordcrs lhc Olcdlhc prcscnlrcvision pclitioil Singh Gagan Preet 2012.12.20 17: 43 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 92 Civil Rciisioil No 1483of2009 4 d havc hcard Icanlcd counscl f70rtIIcparticsand havc gonE lhrougll lhc rccordsofthc caSCe carncd counscl ftr lhc pctitioncrs IItissullillillccl lllIl lllc appcalIllcd bcfclrctlc lcarncd AdditionalDislticl JiiIgc Ilasl1cctl of Oll lllc stalcmcnt inadc by lcarncd coullscl Illr lhc appcllants ll is 1 C subnlittcdthal sils Illcd undcrOrdcr l Rlilc 8 ClC willltl11issuillg 0 nollCC undcr CIrclcr1 Rc 8 CPC to all lhc inhabitaills01thc villagc TIlC Ca appcal cannot bc disposcd of on lhc basis of slatcment of lllc counsclfor thc I t5 Ilis furthcrcontcndcd thal CVCll dccisioll on application uildcr I Ordci 39 Rulcs I and 2 CPC amouns lo lliolalion1IfOrdci l Illilc 8 Cl3C Z To supportlhis conlcnlion counsclfor lhc pclitioncrs rcl icd upon aulhorily C1 Mohammed vs AvarankuttvHaji 1997131 CiveCC 200 ll IS furthcr I contcndcd thal ltlild kcplfor common purposcsduringconsolidationIS Ilol 08 shamiIal dcil lll VICW 01 aulhorily agh Vs CollltlliSSioller llissar 00 Divisionand otllers 1984PIeJe169 7 Z Oll nlcrits it is conlcndcd lhatland is rcscrvcd f11rtllc Ll of latrincand thc proposcdIandis 2 knls away and is unill Ior usc of Ialrinc So thcpraycrhasbccnlnadc or acccplanccof TCVIS10i1 pctitionand for passiilg orclcrtll injunclionagainslthc carncd coLlnscl for lhc has supporlcdtIlC juclgmcnl clf IcarncdCivil Judgc IuIlitll lOiilisioill Sallib Il is colltcndcdlhat tvclfarc 01 lhc is palanlcllll CollsidcralionIor grantof injunctloilA lull 13cnchof lhis courl rCporlcdin Bishamber D v State of Iana and Olo PPel 341 hcldlhal Gram can Pcrlllil lhc construction of IlarijanChaupal on a P0i11tlil of 1 Singh Gagan Preet 2012.12.20 17: 43 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 93 r Civll Rcvision No 1483of2009 5 r lalld uscd as slrcct and thc aclion of thc Clrain Pancllavatis tlol inalii hc counscl for lhe has urlhcr stilIinitlcdtllat in casc lhc raiscd lhc argumcnllhal land in disputcclocs nol vcsl iil thc Gram in that casc ltl VlCW of Scclilln l l aild 13 tIf lllc Villagc CoinmtlnIands lcgulalionl Acl 1961 thcjuiislIiclictl t11lllc Civil CItirt lS harrcd hc watcr works 1S bcingiilstallcd al lhc spotand lIlC sanlC IS 0 mcantfor providing clcan watcr lo all lhc inllabilallts01lhc villagclll caSC 0 lllJunclioll rcinalllS Ill Iorccin lhal casc tllc grallt111lllis rcspcclwill Iapsc I C5 and wholc of lhc villagcshall bc dcprivcd of thc clcan Hlalcr which is lhc I barc So far aS ISSLI21I1CCof noticc undcr ordcr l Rulc 8 CPC lS Z conccrncd lhc pctitioncrs havc wilhdrawnlllc ajIlcalccjlillgin vicw thc welfarc of Illc villagc So lllc provisloils01 Ordcr 1 Rulc 8 CPC IS I lo tllc faclsofthc prcscntcasc oll I havc givenmy ailXIOUS considcration t0 lhc rival contciilions CO madebybotll thc counsclfor lhc particsand havcflOnclhr0ugh lhc rccords mW3 Z of lhc case Ll Ihe objccliollraiscdbylhc counscl 171rthcrcvisionislis of a tccllnicalnaltirc lhal thcnolicc undcr Ordcr I Rulc8 ClC sllould IlailcIlecil issucd priorIo withdrawal of thc appcal Iil lhis casc tccllllical Callllol bc hiirdlc in justiccto thc parlics 911lllCrits lllc lrial Court has hcld llliolacc for Iatrincis oppositcto lllc ClurdwaraSahib and it IS not or lhc wclfarc of thc inhabilantsl rcmainlllc laltine tllcrc and tllcrcallcr anolllcr placcfoi Iatrinc hasbCCllIlrolidcd Tllc spaccin qucslionIlasbccn rcsolvcd lo lhc usc fIr lhc purposc of conslruction of walcr lank I carncd counscl for thc Singh Gagan Preet 2012.12.20 17: 43 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 94 Civil RcllIsion No1483 of2009 6 r 6 revisionislcould 11t11dcrivcany bcncOlof thcauthorily Mohammeds case 4supral Irl VlCW of lhc Iull 13cnchautlloritv tlf Ilishamler ayal s casc supral llc I7ullI3cnchof lhls Couit ill lllc said iiLillltlril lliis llclcl that Clram could challgctllc nalurc 01shalnlallaild ailclusc il iil a manncr it Iikcsunlcss mala Odcis prllvcdTllcrc cailnol Ilcany inala Odc lil thc facts o f lhc prcscntcasc as lhc watcr lank is bcinguscd Ior all thc inhabitantsfor providing clcandrinking Watcr Whichis I barcilcCCSSlly 0 0 llc ctlunscl fcr lhc rcvisionisl has submillccltllal Iaild dICSll4It I 0 VCSl Ill thc Grain and lo supporlIllis ctlillcillilln llc Ilas rcliccl I upollauthority Kala Singh s case 6supl Ilowcvcr lt IS lhat argumcnls Z thal is couiltcr againsll1lc ClISC of thc pclitioncrsIn cascthc r dispulcthc factthat land docs not vcst in lhc Granl PancllaIat I in thal casc lhc prolocr foruin fcr lhcm is lo movc lo thc Collcctoi undci 06 Scctioil I l and ScclicIn13 ofthc VillagcCommon Jands Acl which bars r lhc fllingof thc civil suil In casc civil suil is barrcd in lhal casc als 110 V Z can bc granlcd Qm In vlclv 0l thc abovc cliscussiOll TCVlSlOll 11cl ilion is wilhoul anvmcril andlhc samc standsdismisscd A copy of this judgincnt bc scnt to thc trial Court for strict compliallCC 1 IIJDGK 21110 e Singh Gagan Preet 2012.12.20 17: 43 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document