THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.17729 of 2007 ORDER: On a representation, dated 09.05.2007, submitted by the petitioner, the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, the 1st respondent, accorded permission to construct toilets at Kali Kaman Road near Gulzar Houz. A Memorandum of Agreement was also entered into on 27.07.2007 and the same was submitted for approval to the Commissioner, the 2nd respondent. The Commissioner made an endorsement on 14.08.2007 directing that the proposed construction is likely to be effected, on account of road widening, and in that view of the matter, the petitioner was addressed a letter, dated 17.08.2007, requiring it not to proceed with the construction. The same is challenged in the writ petition. The petitioner contends that based upon the permission, it has commenced the construction by incurring expenditure and there was absolutely no basis for the respondents in issuing the impugned letter. On behalf of the respondents, a counter-affidavit is filed It is stated that though the representation made by the petitioner to provide public amenities on BOT basis was acted upon, it ultimately emerged that the construction would be effected in the widening of the road. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the respondents. While admitting the writ petition, this Court granted interim stay on 21.08.2007, and the same was made absolute thereafter. On the strength of the said order, the petitioner could have proceeded with the construction. It is however stated that the petitioner did not proceed with the same. Four years have elapsed, ever since the impugned letter was issued. It is not known as to whether the road at the concerned place was widened or if there is any proposal in the immediate future. These aspects need to be taken into account. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to pass fresh orders as to the feasibility of permitting the petitioner to proceed with the work and orders in this regard shall be passed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.23.03.2011. GJ