IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN THURSDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2010 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 6945 of 2010(P) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- VINEESH.T.T., AGED 25 YEARS, S/O. VALSAN UOOLAMPARAMBATH HOUSE, PUTHUPPARAM, VATAKARA. BY ADV. SRI.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KANNUR. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOZHIKODE RURAL, KOZHIKODE. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VATAKARA. BY SR.GOVT. PLEADER SRI.R.RAVINDRA BABU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.6945 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. The petitioner challenges an order issued under Section 15 of the Kerala Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007. He was issued a notice under Section 15(1) to show cause as to why a final order shall not be issued under that provision. He showed cause by stating that he was involved only in one offence and in terms of the relevant provisions, he had applied and the competent authority had compounded that offence. This is clearly reflected in Ext.P1 enquiry report given by the police to the criminal court. With that, we do not find any ground on which final order could have been passed against the petitioner. The writ petition, therefore, succeeds. The issue is also covered in favour of the petitioner by the judgment of this Court in WPC.6945/10 2 Moideen v. State of Kerala [2007 (4) KLT 261]. The impugned order is quashed and the writ petition is allowed accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- P.S.GOPINATHAN, Judge. kkb.4/03.