IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24623 of 2008 NAUSAD ANSARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 9.9.2008 Heard. The case relates to theft of a motor-cycle and as per prosecution story the same was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The contention are many fold that the informant gave his further statement on 20.2.2008 but indicated that the motor-cycle had been recovered from the present petitioner. It was contended that the recovery was made on 22.2.2008 and, as such, manipulation should very much be gathered from the case diary. Learned A.P.P. has read out to me the further statement of the informant and it does not indicate that there is any statement about the motor-cycle being seized from the petitioner on the day he made this statement. There is consistent material in the case diary indicating that the theft property was in the possession of the petitioner, considering which this petition is dismissed. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )