IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc.14340-M of 2008 DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 11, 2008 SANTOKH SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. RS Athwal, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. KS Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in regard to the incident mentioned in the FIR, the petitioner has not been ascribed any role. The petitioner, rather, has been implicated on the basis of disclosure statement of an accused, which relates to some other alleged incident. In these circumstances, the petitioner cannot be asked to stand trial in the present FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition so as to raise the argument noticed above before the trial Court, as the entire material would be before the trial Court. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. I am sure the trial Court will consider the issue as raised by the Criminal Misc.14340-M of 2008 2 learned counsel for the petitioner, as it is related to the framing of charge, as against the petitioner. August 11, 2008 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE