IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.787 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE 1. Afzal S/o Shamin Khan 2. Akram S/o Asif Ali ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: September 1, 2010 __________________________________________________________________ Arising out of FIR No.381/2010 Under Sections 332, 353, 427 of IPC and 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act Thana Kashipur, District U.S. Nagar ________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Counter affidavit filed by the State be taken on record. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the allegations have been made against the applicant due to certain misunderstanding which was occurred between the parties. Further, the injuries sustained by the doctors are simple in nature. He further argued that on the basis of the contents of the FIR, offence u/s 3(1)(x) of SC/ST is not made out. It is pleaded that the applicant is in jail since 31.7.2010. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicants deserve bail at this stage. Let the applicants Afzal and Akram be released on bail on executing a personal bond by each one of them and on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Udham Singh Nagar. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 1.9.2010 RG