IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22069 of 2009 1. FULO DEVI 2. RAM TAHAL MANDAL 3. DINESH MANDAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 4/ 24/12/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner No.1 is stated to be the wife of the brother of the husband. Petitioner No.2 is the father-in-law while petitioner No.3 is the brother-in-law. The defence in a police case under Section-304B is that the allegations are primarily against the husband who was demanding a motorcycle for his use. The entire family has been implicated. The father-in-law is aged approximately 70 years. The mother-in-law was unwell and has deceased subsequently. Paragraph-66 of the case diary also notices the statement of the doctor who was treating her. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named surrender before the court below within six weeks when they shall be enlarged on 2 anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Industerial P.S. Case No.50/08, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. This order is based on the premise that the husband of the deceased is in custody. The court below shall verify the same before enlarging the petitioners on anticipatory bail. If the husband of the deceased is not in custody this application shall be deemed to be rejected when the petitioners shall have to surrender and seek regular bail. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)