HIGH COURT OF JUDI ATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W. P. No. 1988 OF 2003 Petitioner : Dr. Suresh Prasad Mishra, S/ o Shri Balmik Présad Mishra, Aged about 54 yaars, Occupation Doctor in Government Aymvedic Hospotal, Bundela, District Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) and R/o VilllageNew Ramnagar, Distt.~Satna (M.P.). Respondents : 1, State of Chhattisgarh, thmugh :’ Th€ Secretauy, Health 8r, Family Wslfare €31. Medical Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). Versus , State of Madhya Pradesh, Through: The Additional Secretaly, Medical Education Department, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.). go Union of India Through:The Director, Department of Pereormel and Training, Public Glievances and Pension, Room No. 312, Lok Nayak Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Khan Maxket,(State Re-organisation Cell) , Khan Market, New Delhi 1 10003. 93 Shri Rahul Birthery, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel lawyer for the respondente No. 1 and 2/State. Shri SK. Beriwal, counsel for the respondent No. 3. out. oRDER {7th February, 2006) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was allocated to the State of Chhattisgarh vide order dated 23.102003, the petitioner wants to make a representation to the respondents/authorities for considering his case for allocating to the State of Madhya Pradesh, to which learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. 7 H In View of foregoing, tha petitioner is grantod liberty to make a ropresontation before tho concerned authorities. The concemed authon'ties are accordingly directed'to consider and decide the representation, if ariy, and to pass order in accordance with law, Within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of representation. In View of the foregoing, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotri {1" Judge W ‘ i m .