SM 1 21.ao.752.03 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 752 OF 2003 M/s. Premson ....Appellant Versus M/s. Choice Centre and another ....Respondents ____________ Mr. P. S. Dani for the Appellant. Mr. Bharat Joshi for the Respondent No.1 CORAM: J. H. BHATIA, J. DATED : 1 ST JULY, 2011. P.C.: The Appeal was preferred against the rejection of Notice of Motion No. 1131 of 2003 in Suit No. 1407 of 2003. This Court had directed the parties to maintain status quo. The learned Counsel for the Defendant/Respondent points out that presently Defendant-firm is not functioning and has been dissolved and the Receiver has been appointed. 2. In view of these circumstances, in my opinion, the Appeal may be disposed of in the following terms:- (i) The Trial Court shall expedite the hearing and disposed the Suit No. 1407 of 2003 within six months. SM 2 21.ao.752.03 (ii) The order of status quo passed by this Court shall continue to operate till then. (iii) All the contentions of both the parties are left open to be decided by the Trial Court. (iv) The Appeal as well as Cross Objection (St.) No. 6041 of 2004 stand disposed off accordingly. (J. H. BHATIA, J.)