WP(C) 5608/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Heard Mr. SB Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. A Verma, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3 and Ms. R Chakraborty, learne d Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate, Assam for the respondent No.4. Considering the grievance raised in this petition and also as agreed to by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, this writ petition is being di sposed of at the motion stage itself. Petitioner’s case in brief is that the father of the petitioner, who was a Pharm acist in Algapur Primary Health Centre (’PHC’ for short), died in harness on 25. 05.02. After demise of his father, petitioner applied for appointment on compass ionate ground before the respondent authorities. On 3.3.03, petitioner submitted a representation before the respondent No.2 through respondent No.3, who forwar ded the same to respondent No.2 on 26.3.03 with a request for moving to the Govt . for according necessary approval to the petitioner’s appointment on compassion ate ground to the post of Vaccinator in Alagapur PHC. Thereafter, on 11.6.03, re spondent No.2 directed the respondent No.3 to furnish the vacancy position of Gr ade III post alongwith the number of persons appointed so far on compassionate g round in the district since 1983 onwards. But the respondent No.3 did not take a ny steps in that regard. Thereafter, the petitioner approached this Court by fil ing a writ petition being WP(C) No.3503/05, which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 13.5.05 directing the respondent authorities to consider the ca se of the petitioner as per Government Circular dated 9th September, 1983 and pa ss appropriate orders within a period of three months from the day when a copy o f this order is furnished. It was further directed that if there is any delay in considering the case of the petitioner, the reason for such delay shall have to be intimated to the petitioner in writing. But despite this Court’s order as af oresaid, the respondent authorities did not take any steps for appointing him on compassionate ground. Petitioner submitted his last representation on 6.8.09 b efore the respondent No.3 praying for recommendation of his case before the Dist rict Level Committee but his case has not been recommended till date. Hence, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the instant writ petition. It is submitted at the Bar that the issue involved is covered by the judgment an d order dated 3.8.06 passed in a batch of writ petitions, the leading case being WP(C) No.3875/05 (Achyut Ranjan Das & Ors. -vs- State of Assam & Ors) reported in 2006 (4) GLT 674. Having regard to the issue raised and the decision rendered by this Court as men tioned above, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the petiti oner’s case shall be considered in terms of the guidelines laid down in Achyut R anjant Das (supra). The petitioner is at liberty to submit a copy of the writ petition alongwith the annexures appended thereto as well as a certified copy of this order and a copy of the order dated 3.8.06 passed in WP(C) No.3875/05 before the respondent No.3 , the Joint Director of Health Services, Hailakandi, Assam, who shall place the case of the petitioner before the District Level Committee for doing the needful . The whole exercise shall be completed within a period of 2 (two) months from t he date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to cost.