fe . SinaieBench : Hon'bie Shri Ditlp Raosaheb Dashmukh. J. (AoDlicantNo.lS ApplicanS No.2 Non-appllcant No.1 (C.S .SM- The New -India Assurance Company Limited.through its Divisional Manager, Divisional Office-1 (450300), Raipur, Tehsli & District Raipur (C.G.) Versus 1.. Gandhi Ram Nishad, S/o Late Shri Fatteram Nishad aged about 48 years. - 2. Smt. Manmotin, W/o Gandhi Ram Nishad,' aged about 44 years, Both are resident of Village Bakalitola, Tehsil Balod, P. S. Dallirajhara, Distriot Durg(C.G.) 3. Ashutosh Mantri, S/o Shri Vimal Kumar Mantri, aged about 24 years, R/o Gandhi Chowk, Daundi, Tahsil Daundi, District Durg (C.G.) (Driver) 4. Sonam Mantri, D/o Shri Vimal Kumar Mantri, R/o Gandhi Chowk, Daundi, Tahsil Dayndi, District Durg (C.G.) (Owner) A&peal ynder Section ire ofthelViotorVehsdes Act, 19%. Present ;- Shri Dashrath Gupta, counsei.forthe appellant. (Passed on this 5 day of September, 2008] . Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that this is an appeal against the interim award passed by the Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (F.T.G.),. Balod, Dlstrict Durg under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Aot. Learned counsel for the appeliant further submitted that vide impugned a'A<ard' dated 12-08-2008, Claim Case No.34/2007 has been finally disposed of, and the Tribunal has exonerated the insuranoe company. Learned counsel ror the appellant prayed that in view of the submission :made above, the appeal bedisposed of. Accordingly, the appeal standsdisposed of. Learned counsel for the appellant prayed that the statutory deposit as required Lmder the proviso to sub Seotion (1) of Section-173 of the IVIotor Vehicles Act was made by the appella.nt in this appeal whioh may be ordered to be refunded. Ordered accordingly. Daip Raos ~§S- ,-v. Judge ^;-. ^