THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4081 OF 2011 ORDER: The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.973 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the VIII-Addl. Senior Civil Judge, R.R. District at L.B. Nagar. This Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the dismissal of I.A.No.807 of 2011 filed by him under Order 11 Rule 14 of C.P.C. to call for the service record of the petitioner from the office of the Agricultural Market Committee, Hyderabad. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. As could be seen, the petitioner seeks production of the service record from the office of the Agricultural Market Committee for the purpose of sending his signatures and thumb impressions to Handwriting Expert for comparison of the signatures on the suit documents with the admitted signatures in the service record. In view of the fact that the petitioner/plaintiff has already examined P.Ws.1 & 2 to substantiate his claim that he did not execute the registered sale deed in favour of the defendant, as rightly observed by the Court below the burden lies on the defendant to prove that the said document is not a forged document. In the circumstances, the Court below cannot be said to have committed any error in dismissing the petitioner/plaintiff’s application to call for the documents in question for the purpose of expert opinion. Hence the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 23.09.2011 GSN