IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC NO.3434 OF 2008 NANDU SINGH, SON OF LATE RAM KATHIN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BAJITPUR, POLICE STATION GHOSHI, DISTRICT JEHANABAD VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI AMIR SUBAHANI, SECRETARY, PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA 3. SHRI NAVIN SINHA, FINANCE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, BIHAR, PATNA 4. SHRI BHANU PRAKASH SHARMA, AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, BIHAR, PATNA 5. SHRI B. RAJENDRA, THE ADMINISTRATOR, BIHAR STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD (ABOLISHED), PANT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA ………………………………………………………………….OPPOSITE PARTIES ********* 4 09/09/2009 By order dated 29.01.2008 passed in CWJC No. 10306 of 2007, this Court had directed the Administrator of the Bihar Agricultural Marketing Board to send the name of the petitioner with or without his comments to the three-men Committee to take decision whether the petitioner was entitled to be absorbed after taking into consideration all the facts. A show cause has been filed on behalf of Opposite Party No. 4 stating therein that the three-men Committee had passed an order on 20.08.2009 rejecting the claim of the petitioner for his absorption. As such, this Court finds that as far as the order of this Court is concerned, it stands complied with. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits 2 that he may be given leave to challenge the decision of the three-men Committee before this Court. It goes without saying that the petitioner would be entitled to take proper and legal actions against the decision of the three-men committee. In the result, this contempt application is dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J)