BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16797 of 2011 1 A.SHAGUL HAMEED 2 M.ABDUL KADER 3 PADIKASU BEEVI :PETITIONERS / ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SRIVILLIPUTHUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.VENKATESAPERUMAL Advocate For Respondent : MR.T.MOHAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under sections 406, 420 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that only petition enquiry is pending against the petitioners on the basis of the complaint preferred by one Ramalan Afrose relating to family dispute. 3.However, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners were frequently called for interrogation by the respondent police and as such they are having apprehension of arrest. 4.It is seen that only petition enquiry is pending against the petitioners on the basis of the complaint preferred by one Ramalan Afrose Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are having apprehension of arrest as they have been called for interrogation by the respondent police frequently, this court is constrained to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivilliputhur, on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners 1 and 2 shall appear before the respondent police every day at 5.30 p.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter they shall be available for interrogation as and when required and the third petitioner being a lady, she shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 21/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District. 2.-Do-Thro'The Chief Judicial Magistrate,Virudhunagar Distt @ Sriviliputhur. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Srivilliputhur. +1. CC to M/S. V.VENKATESAPERUMAL Advocate SR.No.45035. RP/22.12.2011/1P/6C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16797 of 2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/