1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2564 OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. Shri Sachin Arjunrao Tandale .. Respondent Mr.S.N.Patil, G.P. for the State Mr.Sudhir Prabhu i/b Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar for the respondent CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL & & & S.J.KATHAWALA, JJ. S.J.KATHAWALA, JJ. S.J.KATHAWALA, JJ. DATED : 29TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 DATED : 29TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 DATED : 29TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 P.C.: 1. It appears that the State is not very serious in prosecuting the petition as no additional affidavit has been filed by the petitioners to justify the delay in filing this petition. Even otherwise on merits, we do not find any reason to interfere with the order of Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. 2. We find no error or illegality in the 2 approach of the MAT in quashing the order of dismissal as it was found that the respondent did furnish the information that prosecution was pending against him except that he failed to furnish particulars. It is not disputed that the respondent was acquitted in trial and the learned A.G.P. for the State is not able to state whether the State preferred any appeal in the matter or not. Petition is therefore, dismissed. ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( S.J. KATHAWALA, J ) ( S.J. KATHAWALA, J ) ( S.J. KATHAWALA, J )