1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 241 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. OF 2008 IN B.C.C.C.S.C. SUIT NO. 1279 OF 2008 Smt. Sharda (Manjula)Madhukar Salvi ... Appellant (Org. Plaintiff) Vs. Smt. Reshma (Lalita) Rajendra Mohite & Ors. Respondents (Org.defendants) Mr. S.A.Chourasia i/b. Mr. Vinit D. Jawle, Advocates, for the appellant. Ms. M.S.Kumbhar, Advocate, for the respondent No.2. Mr. A.N.Narula i/b. M/s. Jhangiani Narula & Associates, Advocates, fr respondent No.3. Mr. A.R.Patil, AGP, for respondent No.4. Mr. J.G.Reddy, Advocate, for respondent No.5. ` CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 15th March , 2010. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The plaintiff/appellant claims to be a member of the respondent No.2 Society and father of the appellant had made construction of the premises as member of the Society and husband of the respondent No.1 was inducted as a 2 licensee. Now that area has been declared to be slum area and respondent no.3 is developing the same under an authority from the Slum Rehabilitation Authority. The dispute is whether the appellant, who was the owner of the tenement or the respondent No.1, who was in possession of the tenement when it was declared slum, will be entitled to rehabilitation. Admittedly, in view of the direction of the Full Bench of this Court in Tulsiwadi Co-op. Housing Society, a High Power Committee has been constituted to sort out all such disputes. According to the respondent No.3, the Additional Collector has declared the respondent No.1 to be eligible to rehabilitation and that order can be challenged before the High Power Committee. 3. I view of the above circumstances, the learned Counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw this Appeal and states that he will also withdraw the suit from the trial Court and will prefer appropriate appeal/revision/application before the High Power Committee within 15 days from this day. The appellant shall serve the respondents Nos. 1 to 4 a notice as soon as the application is filed before the High Power Committee. If it is so filed, the said application shall be decided by the High Power Committee within 8 weeks thereafter. The respondent No.1 shall abide by the decision of the high Power Committee about the entitlement and rehabilitation of the appellant or the respondent no.1. The respondent No.3 shall not allot the permanent accommodation to any of the parties 3 till then. 4. The Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn accordingly. 5. As the Appeal itself is disposed of, C.A. No.319 of 2010 does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)