IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 518 of 2011 Smt. Lalita Devi ...Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents. Present : Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H. M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Sri. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri H. M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. The petitioner is working as "Mini Angan Bari Worker” at Angan Bari Centre, Chaura Pitta, Block Pati District Champawat. The case of the petitioner is that whenever the post of “Angan Bari Worker”, which is superior to the “Mini Angan Bari Worker”, is created a preference is to be given to the “Mini Angar Bari Worker” who has already been working at the Angan Bari Centre, Chaura Pitta, Block Pati District Champawat. A reliance has been placed on a Government Order dated 29th February, 2009. Evidently, this order has not been complied with in the case of the petitioner. This writ petition is therefore disposed of with the direction to respondent no.4 District Programme Officer/ Child Development Project Officer, District Champawat to dispose of the representation of the petitioner after hearing the petitioner as well as newly appointed Angan Bari Worker i.e. respondent no. 5 and after considering all the relevant government orders and law on the subject dispose of the representation of the petitioner by passing a speaking order as expeditiously as possible but in no 2 case later than eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No order is as to costs. Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 7.6.2011 Kuldeep