^< IMRI ifi <"-^ • ) ^D^ IN THE HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 1 W.P.NO. ^"3-9^ /2006 PETmONER RESPONDENTS sy-' ^•y./-"" 'y./'' ^' ^-'' '^•w;' -•^ "'""", ,»(c '''1^:'"'' n f '-' -t^i" %^y < Bhanwar Singh Dhruv, Aged about ^-years, S/o- Late Shri Ishwar Singh, Post- Shivrinarayan, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Heatth and Famity Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) The Cottector, Janjgir-Champa, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) The Medical and Health Officer, Janjgir-Champa, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) The Block Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) The Medical Officer, Government Civil Dispensary, Shivrinarayan, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrfUTION OFINDLA XI-HC-78 STI^TqiT^icb (raTsn^Tsbt^i* -•* ^iK-TcrraiHT^i s^'^nqRra', »Tnw'is,Rfciiy^< -^p; M..^6.'..^OM. ^200^ 3T^r4"ch (llc<'d'sl^?r) ?T(ITW irfsa'sn^r 11-8-2006 Mr. Anand Kumar Tiwari, c| IVlr. G.K. Beriwal, Depiji respondents, on advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By the instant writ petitior| India, the petitioner has prayecf reimburse/disburse/pay the saiar^ Grievance of the petition^: working as Driver in the Ds Shivrinarayan since 18-3-2004, date. Learned counsei for t| respondent No.3 be directed to submits that the petitioner rr) representation to respondent N<|> decide the same to which respondents has no objection, Having heard learned the facts and cireumstances of| counse! for the peSitioner Therefore, the petitioner Is a! respondent No.3 raising all his writ petition and its annexures w|t in turn, respondent No.3 is dlrecli °bl^Fc1tfl-1 ITTtlcff if t5CS <Vs\W( ^srf^irsn^T ounsel for the petltioner. ity Advocate General for the State/ under Articie 226 of the Constitution of for a direction to the respondents to ofthe petitioner since 18-3-2004. )r raised in this writ petition is that he is paijtment of Medical & Heaith Sen/ices at Ijiut he has not been paid single penny titl Ijie petitioner submits that therefore, |}ay the salary to the petitioner. He aiso |ay be al!owed to make a detailed >.3 and respondent No.3 be directed to lea|rned counsel appearing for the Stat&' couinse for the parties and having regard to the case, the prayer made by iearned to be just, falr and reasonable. to make a detailed representation to •ievances, annexing a copy of the instant thin a period of ten days from today and ed to decide the same within a period of app|ears llowled wlth P.T.O. XI-HC-78 Sn^T^iTR-TH; L^T-SWR' 3^ "i<l<<10<<, aT(1<1'l(o, (sldl^y *11^1rtl ShHlch ^; S(T^?T IT3W (^qt^aK^.ET) 5Tarwnf?cT3n^T one month from the date of itsl raised by the petitioner in an objef With the aforesaid directloili Consequently, M.(W.)P.Nc|. Partles are entitled for certl' receipt, considering all the grievances :tive manner, in accordance with law. !, the writ petition stands disposed of. .3264/2006 also stands disposed of. |fied copy of this order. Sd/- L.C.Bbadoo judge ttii'iiTyi'fl.f wraf ffis<S <Ri<;iii< ^a-rf^q'an^r P.T.O. •\