1 3 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1786/1996. Jeta Ram Vs. B.O.R., Ajmer & Ors. Date of Order :: 20th January 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI None present for the petitioner. ..... BY THE COURT: This writ petition was filed on 30.05.1996 essentially questioning the order dated 19.01.1996 as passed by the Board of Revenue for Rajasthan Ajmer, camp Bikaner in Revision Petition No. 126/1991. By the order impugned, the learned Member of the Board proceeded to reject the revision petition as preferred against the order dated 12.04.1991 as passed by the Revenue Appellate Authority holding an appeal preferred by the petitioner having abated for demise of the respondent Jetha Ram. In this writ petition, the respondents Nos. 4 to 7 remained to be served and process fees and notices in their relation having not been filed for long, the matter was placed before the Court on 07.07.2008. However, on this date, learned counsel who was appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had not established contact despite repeated communications and pleaded no 2 instructions. In the interest of justice, a notice of information was ordered to be issued to the petitioner for making arrangements for conduct of the case, if so desired. The notice sent by the office on the registered address as given in this writ petition has been returned unserved with the Process Server's Report that the addressee was not found in village Napasar nor anybody would extend any information about said addressee. Nobody is present for the petitioner and the petitioner has not been found at the registered address stated in this writ petition and steps have not been taken for service of the unserved respondents. In these circumstances, this Court has no option except to dismiss this writ petition for want of prosecution. The writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. Mohan/