IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13933 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 09, 2010. Girish Chandra Mahto and others .....Petitioners versus Food Corporation of India and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sarjit Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr.Vikas Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) In this civil writ petition, the petitioners seek quashing of the report dated 5.7.2010 (Annexure P-8) submitted by a learned District and Sessions Judge (retired) in compliance to the directions issued by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.2.2010 passed in L.P.A. No.83 of 2009 (FCI and others versus Ram Rattan and others) and L.P.A. No.249 of 2009 (Jagdish Mehto III and others versus Ram Rattan and others) (Annexure P-7). In my considered view, the writ petition is essentially an objection petition on behalf of the petitioners against the aforesaid report dated 5.7.2010 which is yet to be acted upon by the competent authority. In C.W.P.No .13933 of 2010 2 these circumstances, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to raise their objections before the appropriate authority who shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law but at the earliest. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 09, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE