A W66 K/ O IN-THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BI (c.G.) WRIT'PETITION NO.0’??¢G /2004 PETITIONER 'I‘usarkar Dewangan, aged about 44 years, son of Shri B.P. Dewangan, Assistant Grade III, Mini Mata (Hasdeo Bango Project), Water Resources Department, Resident of Behind — Gyandeep School, Chandaniya para, Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir— Champa (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through : The Secretary, Department of Irrigation, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Chief Engineer, Mini Mata (Hasdeo Bango Project), Bilaspur, ’Distt. Bilaspur (CG) G.C. Chandra, Assistan Grade III, Office of the Chie Engineer, Hasdeo Bango Pariyojna, Bilaspur. Gambheér Prasad Yadav, Assistant Grade III, Office of the Executive Engineer, Mini Bango Nagar S.K. No. 4 Dabra, Sakti, Distt. Janjgir —Champa. K.C. Rathore, Assistant- Grade III, .Office of the LASPUR - t f , Executive Engineer, Hasdao Nahar Jal Pr. San. Jahjgir, Distt. Janjgir—Champa. Anup Jawalkar, Offlce Assistant, Grade III, Chief Engineer, Hasdeo Bango. Pariojna, Bilaspur,(C.'G.) B.L. Dewangan, Office Assistant, Office of the Executive Engineer, Bango Nagar San Kr. 6 Sakti, Janjgir—Champa. Kamlesh Singh, Office Assistant, ‘ Grade III, Executive Engineer, Hasdeo Nagar J. Pr S. Janjgir- Champa (Chhattisgarh) R.K. ,i Shukla, Office Assistant, Grade III, Office of the Executive Engineer, Hasdeo Nagar J.PR .-jS. Janjgir—Champa (CG) ‘ 10. GR Lader Haszlea NWT! Pk 3‘ Uavgg4¥~cwwfPa CC g jé“ c fplx Laxm1kumar Tlwari Office Ass1stant Grade III Office of the Chief Engineer Hasdeo Bango ParlyOJna Bilaspur (CG) Agastin Aashwan, Office Ass1stant Grade III Office of the Executive Engineer Div No 5 Kharsm Raigarh (CG) 13. Mohan lal Sriwa's,‘ Office Assistant Grade III Office of the Executive Engineer No 4 Dabhra Sakti Janjgir-Champa @ Smt. Yashoda Shandilya, Office Assistant, Grade III, Office of the Executive Engineer, Janjgir—Cha‘mpa. Smt Anjul Sriwastav, Office Assistant, Grade III, Office of the Chief Engineer, Hasdeo Bango Pariyojna, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Smt. Manjula Sinha, Office Assistant, Grade III, Office of the Chief Engineer, Hasdeo Bango Pariycjana, Bilaspur (CG) M. Mallik, Offlce Assistant, Grade III, Office of the Chief Engineer, Hasdeo Bango Pariyojana, Bilaspur. Paikara, J.S. Office Assistant, Grade III, Office of the Hasdeo Barrage, Division Korba, Distt. Korb (Chhattisgarh) R.A. Khan, Office Assistant, Grade III, Office of the Executive Engineer, S.K. U. Sakti, Janjgir — Champa. Smt Vandana Mohdeekar', Office Assistant, Grade III, Chief Engineer, Hasdeo Bango Pariyojana, Bilaspur (C.G.) Ku. Shobiia Awasthi, Office Assistant, Grade III, Korba . Mandal, Korb (Chhattisgarh) Riyaj Ahmed, Office ssistant, Grade III,. OffiCe of the Executive Engineer, a a , a A Mi Ban. No. Div No. 5, Kharsia, Raigarh (CG) . D.K. Rathore, V Offlce Assistant, Grade III, Off1ce of the Executive Engineer, Janjgir—Champa (CG) 24. P. Rao Office Assistant, Grade III, Off10e of the Chief Engineer, Hasdeo 'Bango Pariyojana, Bilaspur (CG) J.R. Sahu, omce Assistant, V Grade III, Office of the Executive Engineer, Janj gir, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG) 26. R.P. Lahre, Office Assistant, ' Grade III, Office of the Executive Engineer, Mi Ba N Div No.3 Sakti, Janjgirr Smt. Mamta Kale Office Assistant, Grade III, Office of ”the Chief Engineer, Hasdeo Bango Pariyojana, Bilaspur. V UNDER ARTICLES 226(227 OF THE F INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR / ORDERS, DIRECTION / WRIT PETITION CONSTITUTION O THE NATURE OF ORDER APPROPRIATE DIRECTIONS. WW‘PNQ‘27.. 200 mm (W?) v ' ' WMuwwm mafmm %mm_ 3.1.2005 Shri M.D.Sharma, couns 31 for the petitioner. I Shri Dashrath Gupta, Govt. Advocate'for the State. Heard. ' I.A.No. 605 1/2004 for h The petitioner has filed this writ petition for issuance of a writ of i Certiorari for quashing and seting aside the order Annexure P-4 and P-8. The main contention of the petitioner is that he was appointed as L.D.C’.in the Irrigation Department ‘vide order Annexure P—l on 16.1.1984. His thither grievance is that thou‘gh various promotions took place in the department, but the case ofthe is allowed. urgent hearing etitioner was not considered. Learned counsel forthe petitioner also draws attention of the Court towards the fact that many ju ors to the petitioner have been promotedto . the next higher post of U.D.‘C. ‘ During the course of ar ment when the Court was inclined to issue notice to the respondents, lea ed counsel for the petitioner very fairly submitted that he has made re resentation vide Annexure P-11—B which is placed at page 19 of the petiti n. He prays for direction to dispose of the said representation or hemay b permitted to file a desh representation. He I further submits that if any adv rse order is passed or if the petitioner will not be satisfied with the order passed on representation, he may be given an opportunity to‘eome befor “mw’ — m e XI—HC—78 mmwp‘qf’277O/W : 200 mm (Wu). \anéwmm ammm‘ mmm‘ ."~Z r . wwwwww‘m $s1‘mm Without expressing any View on merits, the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed. It is directed that the p atitioner may make a fresh representation to the respondent No. 2 within a period of 3 weeks from today along with a copy ofthis order and if such i representation is made, the respondent No.2 will decide the same within a eriod of 2 months from the date ofits tiling. If the petitioner woul be dissatisfied with the orders passed on representation, he will be at 1i erty to come before this Court. With the aforesaid dire tion, the petition stands finally disposed of. 4 Sd/- L\ g m Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ail ’“-