1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3975/2009 Smt. Raina Nagar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 24.04.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr Mahendra Trivedi, for the petitioner/s. ... In pursuant to the notification Annexure-1 issued by Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer the petitioner faced process of selection to be considered for appointment as Lecturer, School Education and was also called for to face interview on qualifying the written test, however, the interviews were cancelled under communication dated 24.10.2002 issued by the Assistant Secretary of the Commission. Subsequent thereto a fresh process of selection was initiated under an advertisement dated 18.8.2004 to fill up existing 77 vacancies relating to the post of School Lecturers(English). All those 77 vacancies were kept reserved for the persons belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes being backlog vacancies. By way of filing a writ petition (SBCivil Writ Petition No.8650/2007 Vijay Choudhary & Anr. Vs. State & Ors.) certain persons assailed decision of the respondent- State to treat all the vacancies as backlog relating to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The petition for writ aforesaid came to be allowed on 2.5.2008 with a direction to the respondents to consider 2 candidature of the petitioners for appointment on basis of their final selection against 77 vacancies reserved for Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes which could not be filled in on account of non-availability of suitable candidates. The claim of the petitioner is that her case too is required to be considered as per the directions given by this Court in the case of Vijay Choudhary (Supra). I do not find any merit in the claim so made as the petitioner admittedly did not face process of selection in pursuant to the advertisement dated 18.8.2004 issued by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission to fill up existing 77 vacancies relating to the post of Lecturer, School Education in the subject of English. The process of selection that was conducted in the year 2002 was not at all the subject matter in the case of Vijay Choudhary (supra), thus, the judgment given by this Court in the case aforesaid is having no application to the petitioner. Accordingly, this petition for writ is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal '