E; W9 (g; CG? «MD f éF JUMCMURE AT BILADPUR: men. mm .PETITIéN No.1997 OF 2001 PETITION mmmz ARTmLE‘ 226 8: 227, CONSEITUTION OF 1mm *— t tmoner Rama-harm Yadav 3/0 aéeci abaut 36 years, Fax-shad, ashri gmg! Zgl Vice~rreaic1enmyradesh Elgar-hiya Kisan % Majdoor , Congre 53 , Raj endra—Nagar, Bilaspur, Tah. 8c District Bilaspur (C ¢ Ga) Vs. ' Re sponderits ‘13 Chha‘ttisgarh state blec'hricity Board b ThroughaA&d1tlonal Secxetary (Secretariat), :Zalpux- (C.G.) H 2g Ghhatt§egavh a$a$e ELes$yéo§$y Boa£&, J ; Ehyeugh- Executmve Jingineer ‘ (08m), Dlvlslon , Qhysugh , Chhatt isgarh St ate Electricity Board, Sakti, “u‘ ‘ .w" u ' n l H ‘ ‘ %r( ....~M1erwj Dlstrlct- Janageer~6hampa (Gun) P. R. “a; bl Sw‘ g, Mm, ‘ 3. upmmtendent Englneer, (0&M),Circle, H &% ehhattisgarh state Electricity Board. Bilaapur (C.G-.) g J r , E I _ ‘ t”n, b XLHC-ZZ ' W £-m§.a& §q m m ..‘.c?.:,:.i. v , mg j I‘I’“ a‘vam 24.09.2002 Shri Sanjay Shyam Agrawall, cun osel for the pt eitioner. Shri R.Sa1'swa1, counsl fr he espondes. .J e o t rnt Heard. h grievance o t rit eu'tioner is t h inaction of the authorities e .P. letic Boar in not supplying :0 him ‘of th M Eci‘ty d 1 true/authenticated copies o cea1' docnts or which he ad applied on .1.2000. A lis of ocuents, copies wheof required 4 t dm er was annexed to the aplicatin. According to the petitiner, he had po o appled for th copie i tes of idelin of the BOaId i e s n lm gues t.25.. 198. d7 9 Drawing ttention to clae 4 f the guidlines, it is the a us o e ubmission f the leed cosel tha if or ay reason, he s o arn un t f n t ned m po t h concer ecer was not in a sition o supply the copies e was required to pas a aproprie der ag hic the matter could s n pat or ainst wh be taken up before the hier utritis under th sad clause, gh ahoe e i This, according to the etitior has not been don Attenion has pne, e. i also been invited to the clause 5, which provides for punishment for refusal to supply the copies for which prayer is made. -z* [111%W a W W WWWW éawfan Te f he w p o te f 1tn ume f h :f 1—Hc—22‘" ’ I ‘ X ‘ 3&9? mm ww w? No‘ (3‘43 W. , Undisputedly, in the case at h’and and, as it appears &om the mcord, the copies have not been Supplied. The o$cer had intimated " the wntpeh'tjoner that the matter has been mferxed to the higher Tahthorities and after obtaining their opinion, the matter shall be attended to. In this view of‘the matter, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the Wlit petition as it'can be di§posed of at this stage by issuing appropriate dilection to respondents. ' Accordingly, the petition is disposed ofby diiecting respondent No.2 to pass an appropriate order on the applicaion of the petitioner int the light of the guidelines :Annexure P—1_, Within 71 days h‘om the date of 'receipt/ communication of this order. ~ They may take a decision after: "the amount 1s depos1ted by tht petitioner Since the authorities refunded the amount dep031ted by the petitioner Without taking any action on his application, the petitioner may re deposit the amount within a week from today. With the direction made above, the petition stands disposdof. Certihed copy as per‘rules. by 1—!———Q——’—’—‘ Sd/_ PoNaik Judge M“. _ ‘ r WIQ' CM %va gt, dllblunnywwm Ampg w ,\ \k‘qt\\) m