IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2010 / 28TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 25739 of 2010(N) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- RASHEED A.M., AGED 78 YEARS, S/O.A.B.MOHAMMED KUTTY, NELLIKKAPPARAMBU, (ROLLS DANN), JACOB VALLANATTU ROAD, THRIKKANARVATTOM DESOM, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS. SRI.S.JAMAL SRI.BIMAL K.NATH SRI.E.M.SUNIL KUMAR SRI.SREEVALSAN.V RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR(RR), KANAYANNOOR THALUK, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-31. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ERNAKULAM. * ADDL. R4 & R5 IMPLEADED: R4. SMT.S.LULABTH, AGED 70 YEARS, W/O. RASHEED A.M., NELLIKKAPPARAMBU, (ROLLS DANN), JACOB VALLANATTU ROAD, THRIKKANARVATTOM DESOM, ERNAKULAM.P.O., PIN- 602 018. R5. SRI.S.GOPALAKRISHNAN, NO.7, VANDIPETTA COMPOUND, MAIN ROAD, KOLLAM – 1. *ADDL. R4 & R5 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 19/08/2010 IN IA. NO. 11705/2010. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: KL. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J --------------------------- W.P(C) No. 25739 of 2010-N ---------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of August, 2010. J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance projected in the Writ Petition has already been taken up by filing Ext.P4 objection before the first respondent and the matter is still pending. It is also stated that the petitioner will be satisfied, if the first respondent is directed to consider Ext.P4 and pass appropriate orders thereon, within the specified time. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. Considering the limited nature of the relief pressed before this Court, it is not necessary to go into the merits of the case. Accordingly, the first respondent is directed to consider Ext.P4 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the relevant provisions of law, of course after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and all concerned including the additional respondents 4 and 5, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE ab