IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27537 of 2008 KUNJ BIHARI RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.8.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No.60/2008 for the alleged offences registered under section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and section 39/44 of the Indian Electricity Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the allegation against the petitioner is to the effect that he had taken unauthorized connection of electricity and was running his flour mill and thereby committing the offence under section 379 of the Indian Penal Code with respect to the electrical energy. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that there is specific allegation against this petitioner and upon inspection the authority seized the electric wire etc., which was being used for unauthorized connection of electricity. Considering the above, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)