Petltioner Resoonttents HISHCOURT OF CHHATriSOARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 3026 of 2008 Kunjal S/o. Late Shri Mangal, ^ed about 60 yeare, Village Chilhati, Post Loharsi Son, Tah. & Thana Mastyri, Distt. Bilaspur Versus 1) State of ChhattisgaFh through its Secretary, DepartmertofWaferResouroe, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(CG}. 2) Department of Water Resource through •Sub Divisional Officer, Bilaspur (CG). (WritPetltionunderArticte 226 oftheConstitutionoflndia.) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. <IA Present: Shri S.P. Kate, counsel for the petitioner, Shri Atok Batehi, Govt. Actvocate for the respondents/State. ORAL ORDER (Passedon 1SBI dayofJune, 2008) With consent of learned counset appearing for both the partles, the matter isheard finatly. 2) The petitioner was working as permanent gangmanwhen hs was made to retire on 4-4-2008 on attaining the age of 60 years. Shri Kate, tearned couns^ appeanng for the petiticner submits that the issue Involved in this case Is squaiiely covered by the order dated 28-6-2007 passed by this Couri: in Writ Petition (S) No. 3647 of 2007 (Bisshu Ram Gond Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and anotfier). 3) Shri Alok Bateht, learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State does not controvert the submisstons made by Shri Kale. Learned counsei further submits that this case is squarely covered by the order (supra) of this Court. 4} Accordingly, thfs petition is disposed of in frie same terms i.e., the petitioner, who is a permanentgangman, is entitled to rettre on attaining the age of 62 years, in accordance with the Chhatti^arft Shashkiya Sevak (Adhivafshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam, 1967. The petition is accordingiy allowed, subjeot to verifioation oi the facts. No opcier as to costs. _— - - Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge