1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.429 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 4TH FEBRUARY, 2010. 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. The Tribunal has rejected the application, firstly, on the ground that the Petitioner has not exhausted alternative remedy against the order of suspension and instead, directly invoked the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. In any case, the Tribunal has found that application as presented, was barred by limitation provided under Section 21(b) of the Administrative Tribunals Act. 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders 3. To get over this finding, it was contended on behalf of the Petitioner that the Petitioner made representations from time to time. The fact remains that first such representation was rejected as back as in March, 2006. Merely, because the Petitioner kept on making successive representations, it is well established position, the same would not revive the limitation. 4. We find no merits in this Petition so as to invoke our discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Writ Petition is dismissed. [S.S. SHINDE,J.] [A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.] asb/FEB10/wp429.10