1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.564 OF 2009 IN MCA NO. ST. 8625/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.292 OF 1997 (VIJAY RAJABHAU THAKUR..Vs..DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION & OTH.) _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for Applicant. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : JULY 15, 2009. 1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 200 days in applying for restoration of petition dismissed in default on 24th October, 2008 on the ground of lapse on the part of the learned counsel. 2. Advocate Shri Abhyankar had appeared on last occasion for respondents No.2, 3 and 5 and learned A.G.P. Shri Parihar, for respondent No.1. Respondent No.4 is a formal party, he was the Enquiry Officer. 3. The respondents have not filed any replies contesting the correctness of the reasons given in the application for condonation of delay. Hence, for the reasons mentioned in the application, delay condoned. The application is disposed of accordingly. 2 M.C.A.ST.NO. 8625/2009. 4. This is an application for restoration of Writ Petition No. 3292 of 1997 dismissed in default on 24th October, 2008 on account of lapse on the part of the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. Advocate Shri Abhyankar had appeared on last occasion for respondents No.2, 3 and 5 and learned A.G.P. Shri Parihar, for respondent No.1. 6. The respondents have not filed any replies contesting the correctness of the reasons given in the application for restoration. The application is, therefore, allowed, subject to applicant’s depositing costs of Rs.One Thousand in the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Nagpur within one week. JUDGE RR.