o ..A • vo r" y IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ PetitionNo. ! 7^6 of 2004 PETITIONER: RESPONDBNTS: Paras Dheewar aged about 55 years. S/0 Shri Sukalu Village Budera Post-Kharora Tehsil-Raipur Distt. Raipur. (C.G.) VERSUS l.State Of Chhattisgarh $ Through Secretary ^ Water Resou^ces Department Secretariat, Raipur (C.G.) 2. ChiefEngineer ^ Mahanadi Project Department Of Water Resources Raipur (C.G.) S.Executive Engineer j$ ^ater Resources Department Division No.2, Baloda-Bazar ^L- Distt. Raipur. (C.G.) /^ '^y' ^/::(;'../ ^i^ ^•' // 4. Sub-Divisional Officer $ Water Resources Department Sub-Division No.5 Kanki Distt. Raipur. (C.G.) <- <.'<s- 7/ . ^_z' WRIT PETITION UNDl^ARTICLE 226/2^7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI V^C OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. J ^•1 m 1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICAJURE CHHATnSQARH: aLASPUR Slnde Bench: Sstish K Aanihotri. J WRIT F'ETITION N0. 1914 of 2004 Bisahu Ram Yadav Vorsue State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PET1T10N N0. 766 of 2003 Sevak Ram Versus Stato of Chhattlsgarh & Others WRIT PCT1710N N0.2237 of 2003 Teji Lal Kurmi Vorsus State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PET1T10N N0.1271 of 2004 Kashlram Dhoemar V<srsu8 State of Chhattisgarh & Others wrarpETmoN No.ieos of 2004 Ledga Ram Rawat Versus ? State of Chhattisgarh & Others ^:Sff^. 's •: ^iBi Present WRIT PEnTION N0.1709 of 2004 Panchu Ram Vorsus State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION N0. 1766 of 2004 Paras Dhoowar Versus State of Chhattisflarh & Others WRIT PET1T10N N0. 2276 of 2004 Fekulal Sahu Versus State of Chhattisoarh & Others WRIT PCT1710N N0.3612 of 2003 Parsu & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETIT10N N0.1607 of 2002 Samam Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others Mr. Vinay Pandey, Mr. Sunil Ottwani and Mr. S,K. Dadsena, leamed counsel for the petitioner. Mr. V.V.S. Murthy, &Mr. P.S. Koshy.leamed Dy. Advocate Generals with Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava & Mr. Vh/ek Sharma. learned Panel Lawyers for the State of Chhattisgarh. a 's ."®1 ;tli ^ill:s s :IS -xft '^ Brajoch ORDER (Passedon15tn September. 2006) The petftionera in thia batch of writ pelittons are working a3 casual labour gangs. The date of retirement was 55 years, as per circular dated 09.03.2000. Tho rospondont Stato subsequontly by clrcular dated 16.08.2004 increased the age of retirement from 55 years to 60 years. This Court in W.P. No. 1149 of 2003 has considered this dispute as to whether the casual labour gangs, who have retired on attaining the age of 55 years be ghwn the benefit of the circular dated 09.03.2000 for the purpose of retirement on 60 years, and order dated 29.09.2004 of this Court covers squarely the dispute involved in this batch of cases. Accordlngly, the petltlons are dlsposed of In terms of the order dated 29.09.2004 passed by thls Court in W.P. No.1149 of 2003. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge SS!