IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH JULY 2008 / 3RD SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 22079 of 2008(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ P.M.MOHAMMED KOYA, S/O.LATE P.P.HASSAN KOYA,HOUSE NO.11298, NAGARAM VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOZHIKODE. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KOZHIKODE. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. I.V. PRAMOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 22079 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 25th July, 2008. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is challenging Ext. P10 order passed by the Tahsildar, Kozhikode under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act and Rules and Ext. P10 notice for vacating the property which is sought to be resumed from the petitioner. I am of opinion that the petitioner's remedy lies in filing an appeal against Ext. P10 order as provided in the Kerala Land Conservancy Act. The petitioner himself admits that on the very same day the interim order dated 22-7-2008 was passed, the respondents have already taken possession of the property. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge Ext. P10 under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act and Rules. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.