THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1656 of 2011 ORDER: Petitioner – complainant(proposed) approaches this Court by way of invoking the provisions under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. with a prayer to set aside the order dated 02.07.2011 in C.F.R.No.387 of 2011 in unregistered PRC No. of 2011, under which the learned Magistrate dismissed the private complaint filed by the petitioner under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. The main grievance of the petitioner in the complaint is that he was in possession of survey No.35/7 of Telkapally village and mandal. The respondent – accused entered into the place and abused the complainant by mentioning his caste and also necked out him from the land, which is in his possession. The petitioner lodged a complaint before the concerned police and the same was not acted upon. Hence he lodged a complaint before the superior officers in which also no action has been taken. Aggrieved over the same, he filed a private complaint in C.F.R.No.387 of 2011. Learned Magistrate after examining the complainant and also his witness one Bala Krishna dismissed the complaint on the following grounds: i. the petitioner has not stated the place, which is under his possession; and ii. the petitioner has not stated the date of occurrence and also the utterance of the words against him are not supported by the other witness, who is the witness produced by him before the Court. This Court is of the view that the learned Magistrate passed the order only after examination of the complainant and his witness and also after perusing the documents filed by him and that the statement of the complainant was not supported by the witness in connection with the words uttered by the accused against the petitioner herein. As far as the possession of the land is concerned, even though he filed a document, but he has not stated the survey number before the Court and on perusal of the entire evidence adduced, either P.W.1 or P.W.2 mentioned any date on which the occurrence took place and at what time. In the absence of any such things, this Court is of the view that the order passed by the learned Magistrate is in accordance with law. Hence, there is no need to interfere with the same and the present revision is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Criminal revision case is dismissed as devoid of merits. The miscellaneous petitions, if any, filed along with the criminal revision case shall stand closed. _________________ RAJA ELANGO, J. 16th August 2011, Rns.