IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10088 of 2007 SHIV NANDAN DAS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 11 18.11.2009 After perusing the order dated 26.11.2008 and the affidavits filed by the State counsel thereafter, obviously the claim made by the petitioner does not remain an accepted claim. Serious dispute has been raised by respondents and their stand is that they have even taken action against persons who were at the helms of affairs. Action has been taken against all responsible persons who were given responsibility of supervision as well as passing of the bills. The disputes are there and no final word has come on the issue. If that be so, the Court has reservation and is of the opinion that it can not give any direction to the respondents to pay the money due to the petitioner, which even according to the petitioner, he was entitled to after completion of work on 26.4.2000. No order or direction is required to be issued in the matter. This writ application is dismissed. But if the petitioner has other forum to pursue the matter, the same is not barred in accordance with law. SKBOSE (Ajay Kumar Tripathi)