( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4642 OF 1996 1. The State of Maharashtra .. Petitioners 2. Upa-Vansanrakshak Mewasi Vibhag Taloda, Dist. Dhule. 3. Vanasanrakshak, Vanavritta, Near S.R.P., Kawayat Maidan, Dhule. 4. Mukhya Vansanrakshak, Jayaka Building, Commercial Road, Civil Lines, Nagpur. 5. Mahasul & Vanavibhag Sachiv, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 6. The Member, Industrial Tribunal, Nasik. Versus Shri Salim Shafi Mohd. Nakarani, .. Respondent At Akkalkua, Tq. Akkalkua, Dist. Dhule. Shri D.V. Tele, A.G.P. for the petitioners. Shri R.R. Patil, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J. DATED : 11.09.2009 ( 2 ) ORAL JUDGMENT :- 1. This writ petition is filed being aggrieved by the ex-parte order passed by the Industrial Court, Nashik, in Complaint (ULP) No. 126 of 1992 on 08.04.1993, whereby the Industrial Court extended permanency benefit to the respondent w.e.f. 01.03.1982. 2. The learned A.G.P. has placed on record certain documents which are taken on record and collectively marked “X” for identification. As per the documents produced on record, present respondent was absorbed on regular basis w.e.f. 31.01.1996. It appears from order dated 22.07.1996 that undertaking to that effect was executed by present respondent and the respondent has accepted his permanency w.e.f. 31.01.1996. The effect of regularization is given w.e.f. 31.01.1996 as per documents marked “X”. 3. The advocates for both sides wish me to dispose of this writ petition accordingly. 4. Therefore, the writ petition is partly allowed. It ( 3 ) is directed that the petitioner shall give the respondents the benefits as per documents produced and marked “X”. 5. Rule made partly absolute and writ petition is accordingly disposed of. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2009/SEP09/wp4642.96