SIN6LE BEMCH c (T,!GO .^ <? •e^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.P.No.J?'^ /2006 PETmONER \^-ff^>' 4^f?''' s^^"' '?&^' -<?<^>°A/-" y RESPONDENTS Dindayal Sahu S/o g.R.Sahu, Aged about 61 yrs., Head maste/, Girls Primary school, Arang, District Raipur, (C.G.) f VERSUS <--1) State of Chhattisgarh ,Through The Secretary, School education Department, DKS Bhavan, Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) ^-2) The district education officer, Raipur, Pension bada, Raipttr, C.G. --3) The block education officer, Arang, Tahsil Arang, Dist: Ftaipur, C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPIRATE WRIT/WRITS. DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS AND ORDER/ORDSERS ECT. XI-HC-78 *TW<?TT 9»W^i 3^'-<<l'q|lv1<l, a-rfltf'16, RlWltiy •»*<****tt)*A **•'*«/****•*W^ 200 3;n^T^TR-li+ tPIT3fgi?Tstit|ieb u 3TT^r1T3w (I^fg3^r) ?(<tTW:lri?(T3TI^T 25.7.2006 r. S.C. Verma, Advocate Vpr the petitioner. Mr. Vinay Pandey, P.L. for Heard. By this petition, the petitiorjer Grade-111 at Giris Primary School| order dated 12.7.2006 (Annexur^ Rrimary School, Simga, Distriot Rajpur. Learned counsel for the pe( retire within a period of one year 41' transferred against the transfer pol| of any employee is due in one yea^ Moreover, the petitioner's daughtef petitioner is the only male member] In the circumstances, leari] ihe State on advanoe copy. petitioner may be allowed to make] raising all his grievances and in tu| same in accordance with law, to objeotion. Having heard learned coui facts and circumstances ofthe casi of the oase, the petitioner is all' respondent No.1 raising all his grk copy of this petition and in turn, re the petitioner within a period of 30 With the direction aforesaid Consequently, M.(W.)P. No Certified copy as per mles. »bl<lfcl''fl-lWRTf tffS^ <(S|<-41< ^arf^-iTsn^T T, who is working as Head Master, Assistant Arang, District Raipur, has challenged the P-1) whereby he has been transferred to ftioner submitted that the petitioner is going to ind at the fag end of his career, he has been icy of State, which envisages that if retirement r, then he should not be subjected to transfer. is a mentally chailenged glrl by birth and the lin the family to look after her. ted counset for the petitioner submitted that a detailed representation to respondent No.1 ^n, respondent No.1 be directed to decide the Iwhich learned counsel for the State has no jisel for the parties and having regard to the ^, without expressing any opinion on the merit fiwed to make a detailed representation to tvances within 10 days from today along with ^pondent No.1 to decide the representation of (lays from the date of reoeipt of representation in aocordanoe with law after co|isidering all the grievances raised by the petitioner. the petition stands disposed of, 2886/06 also stands disposed ot Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge