: 1 : IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.3 OF 1993 NO.3 OF 1993 NO.3 OF 1993 IN IN IN PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.40 OF 1992 NO.40 OF 1992 NO.40 OF 1992 Nandini D.Keria .. Plaintiff. Versus Manish Pranlal Patel .. Defendant. None for parties. CORAM CORAM CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 21st January, 2008. : 21st January, 2008. : 21st January, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. By an order dated 7th January, 2008, issues were framed in this suit. Plaintiff was directed to file affidavit of evidence in support of suit claim together with the original documents on which plaintiff proposes to rely. Plaintiff was also directed to be ready with evidence on the next date of hearing to prove documents; denied by the defendant. 2. Inspite of order dated 7th January, 2008, neither the documents nor affidavit of evidence is filed. Today, neither the plaintiff nor the Advocate appearing for the plaintiff is present. 3. Under these circumstances, suit is dismissed for want of evidence with no order as to costs. Decree be drawn up accordingly. (V.C. (V.C. (V.C. DAGA, J.) DAGA, J.) DAGA, J.)