IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.8011 of 2010 RAMASHISH PASWAN son of Sri Khantar Paswan, resident of village- Makhantola, Simri Bakhtiyarpur, P.S. Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa ….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Anup Mukhiya son of Late Bachchu Mukhiya, resident of village- Kasimpur Tolwa, P.S. Salkhua, Dist.- Sahrasa …Opposite Parties ----------- For the petitioner : Mr.Arun Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ------------- 2/ 01.12.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 05.08.2003 by which the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, has taken cognizance under sections 406, 420, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code in Complaint Case No.655-C of 1996. It has been contended that even on perusal of the complaint petition no offence whatsoever is made out against him since the allegations are vague, bald and not substantiated by cogent materials. Further submission is that in the facts of the case this court had considered the case of the co-accused SreeNiwas Singh vide Cr. Misc. No. 28933 of 2007 and held that there was hardly any allegation against the petitioner that constitute any offence under sections 406, 420, 120-B Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the case of the petitioner is similar his case should also be quashed. In view of such, this application is allowed and the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No.655-C of 1996/ Tr. No.914 of 1996 is hereby set aside. The application stands allowed. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)