IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8326 of 2010 1. SHARMENDRA YADAV S/O ARJUN YADAV 2. ARJUN YADAV S/O MOCHHU YADAV BOTH R/O VILLAGE- LAXMI BIGHA, P.S. RAJAULI, DISTRICT- NAWADA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. NAND LAL PASWAN S/O LATE KAILASH PASWAN R/O VILLAGE- LAXMI BIGHA, P.S. RAJAULI, DISTT. NAWADA. ----------- 2. 30.11.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 24.11.2009, by which he has taken cognizance under Section 364 (A), 120 (B), and 302 and 201/34 of the I.P.C. It is fairly conceded that during investigation the petitioner’s name transpired in the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and, therefore, I see no justification for interfering with the order of cognizance. The application is dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )