IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6985 of 2011 SURESH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 363,366/34 of the I.P.C. The F.I.R. was lodged on the basis of telephonic information supplied by the victim girl. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Annexure-2 on record suggests that the victim was married with the brother of the petitioner, Shyam Yadav and he has been implicated only because he is brother of Shyam Yadav. Considering the fact that main accusation is against Shyam Yadav, let the petitioner above named be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 236 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten 2 Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Motihari, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)