IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.947 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 20.08.2008 in W.P.NO.18066 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Ahmed Saleemuddin S/o.Ahmed Raziuddin, R/o.H.No.9-4-168, Kashmir Gudda Karimnagar, Andhra Pradesh. ...APPELLANT AND The Revenue Divisional Officer, Collectorate Buildings, Karimnagar, Andhra Pradesh. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: MR.MIRZA NISAR AHMED BAIG Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court delivered the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.947 of 2008 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Mr Justice B.Prakash Rao) The appellant seeks to assail the order passed on 20.08.2008 in W.P.No.18066 of 2008 by the learned Single Judge of this Court. In the Writ Petition, the petitioner-appellant herein sought direction to the respondent to consider his application submitted in February 2008 for granting him permanent authorization for the fair price shop No.0143, Karimnagar Town as expeditiously as possible. After considering the objection raised on behalf of the respondent, learned Single Judge did not ﬁnd favour with the relief sought for since the appellant has no enforceable right to seek such relief as long as no notiﬁcation is issued calling for applications for grant of a permanent authorization and dismissed the Writ Petition. Hence, the appeal. Having heard on either side and on perusal of the material available on record, it is seen that the relief relates to locus and right of the appellant herein and necessarily, the appellant has to come along with all eligible qualiﬁed applicants, as and when notiﬁcation is issued. However, it is made clear that in the event, the appellant is entitled to any preferential right, the same can be considered. Subject to the above, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) ________________ (R.KANTHA RAO, J) 1st September 2008 RRB