Crl.M. No. M-17029 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-17029 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 1.3.2011 ... Davinder Singh and another ................Petitioners vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Baldev Singh, Senior Advocate with Sh. Sudhir Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners Sh. A.S. Rai, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Sh. Yogesh Goel, Advocate for the complainant. ... K.C. Puri, J. Petition qua petitioner No.1 has already been dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 22.7.2010. Petitioner No.2 – Balveer Singh has joined the investigation. According to the State counsel, on instructions from SI Sanjeev Kapoor, Balveer Singh is aged 75 years although, Balveer Singh has alleged that he is more than 80 years. Counsel for the complainant has submitted that petitioner No.2 is not entitled to the concession of anticipatory bail as recovery of house hold articles is yet to be made and that his wife was Crl.M. No. M-17029 of 2010 -2- kidnapped. However, in this case Davinder Singh – petitioner No.1 was arrested and no recovery was effected. It is not mentioned in the FIR that house hold articles have been taken away except TV, CD Player, gold ornaments and cash amount. So, in these circumstances, the order dated 22.7.2010, passed by this Court is made absolute. ( K.C. Puri ) 1.3.2011 Judge chugh