IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 140 (S/S) of 2008 Sasia S/o Sri Chinchalu R/o Village Salaga P.O. Khamrauli, via Sahia Tehsil Kalsi, District Dehradun. ......Petitioner. Versus 1. Executive Engineer Provincial Division Public Works Department District Dehradun. 2. Executive Engineer Temporary Division Public Works Department Sahia (Kalsi), Dehradun. .........Respondents. Shri Deepak Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service. 3. It is stated by the petitioner in the writ petition that he is illiterate person and aged 44 years. However, as per service record, he has been shown to be aged 60 years and superannuated from service on 30.04.2007. It is pleaded in the writ petition that the age shown in the service record is wrong as on getting medically examined, the petitioner was found to be aged 42 years only. 4. It appears that during his service, petitioner never raised any objection as to date of birth recorded in the service record. After superannuation an employee cannot be permitted to dispute the same. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel, this Court is not inclined to grant the relief sought by the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt. 29.02.2008 Sweta