IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.433 OF 2005 Anand Ganpat Parte ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.Subhash Jha i/b Law Global for Applicant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. FEBRUARY 2, 2005. FEBRUARY 2, 2005. FEBRUARY 2, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. 2. It is seen that the incident in question took place on the spur of the moment. No motive is alleged. The Applicant is stated to have given one blow, which indeed turned out to be fatal. As there are no antecedents against the Applicant and the circumstances in which the offence took place, coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has been : 2 : filed, Applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail on the following conditions: (a) The Applicant is enlarged on bail in connection with C.R.No.112/04 registered with Dongri Police Station, Mumbai, on executing personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with one or two local sureties in the like amount. (b) The Applicant to report to the concerned Police Station once a month on first Saturday of every English calender month between 10.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. (c) The Applicant shall not influence the prosecution witnesses or tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner whatsoever. (d) The Applicant shall extend full co-operation to the Trial Court for early disposal of the trial and if the Trial Court is of the opinion that the Applicant is responsible for the delay of the trial, that fact be recorded in the : 3 : Roznama, which will be a ground for cancellation of bail. . Application disposed of on the above terms. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.