IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 10TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 21ST MAGHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 1116 of 2011() ----------------------------- (CRIME NO.102/2005 OF IRITTY POLICE STATION), KANNUR DISTRICT). ---- PETITIONER/4TH ACCUSED ------------------------------------------ ANEESH.K.P., PANNIYODAN, THAVILAKUTTY,METHALE PUNNAD, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.CIBI THOMAS RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT/STATE ------------------------------------------------------ 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, IRITTY POLICE STATION.670 703 2. STATE REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI.V.MANU THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: VK V. RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------------- Bail Application No.1116 of 2011 ------------------------------- DATE: 10.02.2011 O R D E R Petitioner, who is the 4th accused in C.P.No.41/2010 on the file of J.F.C.M, Mattannur, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Admittedly, non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same day on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner and also after considering the explanation offered by the petitioner for his previous non-appearance. With the above observation this application is disposed of . Dated this the 10th day of February, 2011. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. sj