1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.926 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Janaseva Sahakari Bank Ltd. ..Respondent. AND INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.932 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Mahesh Sahakari Bank Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant. None for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 18TH JUNE, 2009. P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the revenu. Office objections stand overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeals. 2. The appeals are taken up for hearing at the request of learned counsel for revenue. He fairly 2 states that the issue sought to be raised in the above appeals are covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Income Tax Appeal No.46 of 2008 decided on 16/6/2008[CIT V/s. The Solapur Nagari Audyogic Sahakari Bank Ltd. A/w. other matters]. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in these appeals. The appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)