IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 2ND MARCH 2010 / 11TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 263 of 2010(G) ------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------- MOHAMMAD SHERIEF, S/O.MAMMAD HAJI, KALLANKUNNAN HOUSE, MUNDUPARAMBA, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.VINOD VALLIKAPPAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE MALAPPURAM MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MALAPPURAM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT When the case came up on 6.1.2010 and on 30.1.2010, counsel was absent. Today also the counsel is not present. Petitioner called absent. Writ petition is dismissed. 2.3.2010. SD/-ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE // true copy // P.S to Judge. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 263 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 5th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T Aggrieved by the rejection of an application for building permit as per Ext.P1 the petitioner has filed this writ petition. Permission sought for was declined. On account of the existence of a master plan, the request of the petitioner could not be acceded to, was the reason assigned for the rejection. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioner brought to my notice the common judgment in WP(C) No.19337/09 and connected writ petitions. Relying on a decision of this Court in Nasar V. Malappuram Municipality(2009(3)KLT 92), this Court interfered with the impugned orders and directed for re-consideration of the applications submitted by the petitioners therein. To enable the respondents to reconsider the application submitted by the petitioner based on the WPC.263/2010 : 2 : decision reported in Nasar's case(Supra) Ext.P1 is set aside. Consequently, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to re-consider the application submitted by the petitioner that led to passing of Ext.P1, in accordance with law, in the light of Nasar's case(Supra). Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge