IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No. 5999 of 2006 (O&M) Date of decision : 14.11.2006. Jani @ Mohammad Ramzan & Ors. .........Petitioners. Versus Abdul Razak ...........Respondent. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present : Mr.V.S. Rana,Advocate for Mr. Hemen Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. **** VINOD K. SHARMA,J.( ORAL ) The present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 4.10.2006 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Panchkula closing the evidence of the petitioners as he has failed to conclude his evidence inspite of several opportunities having been given to them. The learned counsel for the petitioners prays that in the interest of justice, he may be granted one opportunity to lead his entire evidence. Without going into the merits of the case, I feel that interest of justice would be served if the petitioners are granted one opportunity to lead their entire evidence on payment of costs. Accordingly, the present revision is allowed. The impugned order is set aside and the petitioners are granted one last C.R.No. 5999 of 2006 [2] opportunity to lead their entire evidence on the date to be fixed by the trial Court,on payment of Rs. 5000/- as costs. 14.11.2006 ( VINOD K. SHARMA ) 'sp' JUDGE