^(ro> m THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUS WritPetitionNo. ;2.&s?...of2003^ 1) 2) K.M. Khasnavis r/o 119, Vivekanand Nagar, Post: MOPKA, Dist: Bilaspur P.C. Khasnavis, r/o Chirimiri Colliery, Dist:Korea-497449 ^^" .--^^" ..^"^ r«- A»^o' PETITIONERS VERSUS South Eastem Coalfields Ltd. Through its Chairman-cuni-Managing Director Seepat Road, Bilaspur(CG) ChiefGeneral Manager Chirimiri Area P.0. West Chirimiri Colliery Dist. Koria (CG) RESPONDENTNo.l RESPONDENTNo.2 Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India :n: HWM ^W^ vj-OT) -yi^lri^, yTfl'<-i<is, [qrtlf-iy ^ .kl:E.^.^.^..... ^200 gn^STq^F (yii^i'a) sn^sTtFif^ira? 'ffafTSlI^STsRTT'P R*. "!RS;::^S&'. •!:%1^- ?TOTSR^1t?T3IT^?T 'BLI AGNIHOTRI, J. 01/07/2005: Mr. R.N. Mukhopadhya^ Mr. Vinod Deshkukh tearr Heard. 1 n§ psuiiOusr nss nisu Constitution of tndia complainind pension as oer tevised pay s<t; disoi'lnilnBted JP cs^s of Dsvnt ilSowances have been to oth I^ un0isspuioa i3cis OT tno c< IMG.I reurea on sup^fanriuanon and petitioner No.2 retired on Payment of the petitioners' salar bv the Centrat Psv CommissEon. QAH$ion ^nd ni^dlosl ^HowancBB. •si!.^BslA,?'ssAA&s ^&.i£.y& B^rsnf'ifes'1^ sa ^liiVWsE iUS?5 , ¥?C!^ ^liSii&S?^ a5 -/^•^iAASBAi^,i^.S-—E.^i-a.^, i ES-t^Agt. ^UrEiTiiiSSIUfI £i5 UiiUS;!. ' area not covsrsd bv ( amount of medicat ailoi the expena sXp^HScS IHaf Qu uOl F T'Es.-s. »-^.^.u«^ nn »JS •-. ..n.S—^ '=».-- i E i^»r i'ws^'WilWwi S!.'sf ES&i"' 'iii.iUUCi S i id^JiS ; s^ diKlfri^-1 tll*4ci.T^fel<!l •(RK-dl'; ^sif^iran^sT arned counsei for She petitloners. kS. this petltlGH UHuBf Artlcte 226 of ths that the rssDondents havs not fixed their ale and further the Detitioner has been 'ent of medicat allowances as medica! ^r slnillsrlv sltustod SHIDIOVO^B. ' ISQ IH naffOr? COHip^SS SfQ uEi3i psijcioncr on 01/07(1988 as Office Superintendent 101/02/1989 as Suparintendent (Traffic'i. ', allowances and pensions are regulated IThe Detit'Qners have been denied revised Acoordlno to th8 oBtItionafs. th6 n'i©dlc^l l'^.A^^^ain^n*!sf;^it^s ^,f fh^ PJft'h ^•S^i ^SI tSwVllisllSUUwlEUl IS V! II IS t'iilEE i-^y - (D ^ensioners rasiding in an pHS should be given a fixed If'ances @ Rs. 100 per month for tuf@ on dsv"to°d8v mg-dicsi ^ -'v"f •--'^~»-----^- [Ults iiOSDi'i^l^atiOri. &n©ii'r$pij wri3E©in.ic n^s o©^ft31^130 snsi jecelved the monetary benents of the I ^- SP/FS/2005-20,000 vjiyc) T^ 141ri^l, yTilt-f<is, firti'<-iyl< *11*1ril WW 3I1^?T q=l^('yi(g'si<s) Wl.200 an^sTipiR-ii* a8IT3IT^St(F*I \ 1.'-- ^r^;£^\ g^aT8R^[fl?Tai^ST -2-- 91& revisipn of pay and pension ^ undertaken and ensured that th^ NCWA-IV shall be settled with Darbhanga House, Ranchi and Vi\< had not yet been done. Learned counse! appearinfa medfeal aitowances @ Rs.100/- rfs In response, Seamed counsei app< other sirnilariy situated employe^s recommendaiions ofthe Fifth Pa^ of theemployees ofthe responden|l !n vlew Q' the undertaKins reply, it is not necessary to gd i4 pension on the basis of revised to settle the payment as axpeditioi of pne month as the petitioners February 1989. The respondent^ there is a ciear recommendatiom been accepted by the responden) pensionetc: in view of the foregoing, tt their own costs. <hi.si[oi4l'i yit|dTff(s»<3•(I'jitci'! ^all^TSII^ST s per NCWA-IV, the respondents had fixation of pay of the petitioners as per he authorities of Central Coalfieids Ltd, same shaii be settled at the earliest, if it for t!ie resporidents contends that the v mortth is not payabte to the petitionere. aring for the petitioners contends thatthe are paiq' mea'ical allowances as per CQmmission which is applicabte in case |iven by the respondents in para 4o? thelr the.question of payment and fixanon or p|ay ScS?es». The respondente are dlrected isly as possibie preferably within a pariod ]are retired long back in iJuly 1988 and have to pay medicai aSlcwances aiso as |of the Fiftti Pay Commisslon n^iich have ts for the purposs of payment of salary, ^j»titionis allowed. Parttes shali bear SdA .. : ,. SatishK. ~ Judge [i ^.^ •^' SR/FS/2005-20,000