IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 28540 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 20.10.2011 Dhian Singh @ Dhiana Ram ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Gopal Singh Nahel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. …… RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as per the allegations in the FIR, from the person, who was arrested from the spot, two bags containing 60 Kgs of poppy husk were recovered. One Dhanna Singh resident of Ratia now resident of village Sohia had run away from the spot where five police officials were in Government vehicle. He further submitted that the petitioner is not resident of Ratia. He is resident of village Alika, Tehsil Ratia and is merely working as a labourer. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from H.C. Sukhdev Singh, did not dispute the aforesaid facts. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions made above, in my opinion, the petitioner is not required to be taken into custody for interrogation. The petitioner is directed to appear be- fore the Investigating Officer on 02.11.2011 at 10.00 a.m. to join investiga- tion and in case of arrest, he shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. He shall appear before the Inves- tigating Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. He shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 20.10.2011 sharmila