IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.R. No.: 130 of 2010. Decided on: 18.07.2011. __________________________________________________ Gaya Prashad. … Petitioner. Versus Ashok Kumar and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. B.C. Negi, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): The case was called in the morning session. Nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The case called again in the post-lunch secession. Neither the petitioner is present in person nor is he represented by any learned counsel. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed for non- prosecution, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. July 18, 2011. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?