-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 212 OF 2006 Vinay Agarwal... ........ Applicant. Versus Union of India.... .......... Respondent. Mr. R.R.Pandey i/by Mr. U.S.Samudrala for the Applicant. Mr. T.J.Pandian for the Respondent. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. DATED : 22ND JUNE, 2007. DATED : 22ND JUNE, 2007. DATED : 22ND JUNE, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent submits that they have no objection, if the applicant agrees to the proposal for appointment of an Arbitrator by the General Manager, Central Railway within eight weeks and all objections and claims of the parties, which have been stated in the application / reply, may be referred to the Arbitrator. Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant states that he has no objection and the application may be allowed in terms of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the respondent. 2. In view of the joint statement made by the learned Counsel appearing for the parties, this arbitration application under Section 20 of the Arbitration and -: 2 :- Conciliation Act may be disposed of. The same is, accordingly, disposed of. The respondent will abide by the statement by appointing Arbitrator within eight weeks from today. Arbitration proceedings shall be concluded expeditiously. 3. However, parties are left to bear their own costs. Sd/- CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE