IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 63 OF 2008 SHRI. CONCEICAO FERNANDES AND 3 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus SMT. DUMETINA REBELLO AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Agnelo. F. Diniz,Advocate for the petitioners. Adv. Valmiki Menezes, Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 12th December, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard Mr. Diniz, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Menezes, learned Counsel for the respondents. 2. By this petition, the petitioners challenge the order dated 03.01.2008 passed by the District Judge, South Goa, Margao in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No.12/2006 as well as the order dated 23.01.2006 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Margao in Regular Civil Suit No.128/2005/III. 3. Both the Courts below, have concurrently held against the petitioners and dismissed the application for interim relief filed by the plaintiffs. Mr. Menezes, learned Counsel for the respondents states that Regular Civil Suit No.128/2005/III, is fixed for plaintiffs' evidence on 16.12.2008. 4. In view of the above position, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned orders at this stage. However, I am inclined to accede to the request of Mr.Diniz, learned Counsel for the petitioners to expedite the suit, which is already fixed for plaintiffs' evidence. 5. In view of the above, the Trial Court is directed to expedite the disposal of the Regular Civil Suit No.128/2005/III and in any case to dispose of the suit on or before 30.12.2009. The learned Counsel appearing for the parties, assure this Court that the parties will not seek unnecessary adjournments and shall cooperate with the Trial Court for early disposal of the suit. Needless to mention that the Trial Court shall decide the suit on its own merits uninfluenced by the observations made and the findings given in the impugned orders. The writ petition stands dismissed subject to the directions given above with no order as to costs. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA