1 f^ 0^'^ itatlitfl LN THE H1GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WR1T PETITION N0. 4-"<^2_ QF 2004 PETIT10NER .1^^ ^^^5 ^^ ^-•"^' y. ^••-<?.< <":^.^ ^ RESPONDENTS Sayyed Munsad Ali, S/o. Late Sayyed Mumtaz Ali, Aged about 52 years, Assistant Grade - II, Regional Deputy Commissioner Land Record Office, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through; the Revenue Secretary, Raipur. ^ Commissioner, Land R.ecords, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Regional Deputy Commissioner, Land Records, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Under Secretary, Revenue Depanment, R.aipur.(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONiTITUTION OF INDIA ;-+ Ifi:'?[- K ?'nw?iT<i»*<i<* 3'^;'-t|i't|ici<<, ©•ttly'Ko,RjMiy^'f. IV. P. Ro' ^iiyQ'i-/3_yo^. •^••"•••^1200 3TR!?T TTOr('j,ql3a«^) 311^1 .^tl<-li<h; ?TO Stn^ff %criq? /"•/\'^ f Advbcate furdier )2.11.20Q4 Sfari Shailendra Dubey, cou4s ShriU,N.S;Deo,Govt. Application for urgentheariji^ Heard. Leamed counsel for the transfer of the petitioner. He transferred onthe basis of compl^i also submits that forthe presenttht of filing the detailed representaticjn respondents, which shall be consj withlaw. . 1 Having considered and ofthe case, mthebpfflipnofthis; direetion is given to the petitioner;| his grievances before the eompetet^t. a eopy of the petition and this representation being filed,tfae decide the sanie on its own metji possible preferably within six v|'e representation. It is made clear petitioner may avail the remedy av( |sel forthe petitioner. forfheState. |ig i.s allowed. pet^tioner witHout efrt^<n41Tf ^R^f ^f 1y?^J^^R iraffiCT3Tl%?r subniits that the tnatter relates to submits that the petitioner has been impl^mt made by the Employees Uhion. He petitioner may be given an opportunity before the competent autUority of the Idered on its own merits in accordaiice expressing any ophrion on the merits Court, ends ofjustice will be served ifa, to make a detailed represeiitatiottraisiai t authority Qffhe respondents along with order, within 10 days, and on such authority ofthe respondents shall its in accordance with law as earlv as •eeks fi-om the date of receipt ;of Ihe httt if aay grievanee still remains, the dlable uflderthelaw. . ' conjipetent —9/10(x—50,000. .i -i • IE ua m^s"r^wa Ei^l 'n'w' ani^iw ^•w* W SV^t &i^iq» NIWtTaiWW 'S'^.'^IWii, VSX^WI'a, h'fiW'ji. W,^ ^o./ifff2-/i^V^- "W1300 sn^B'^^ (i^fsis?) ^<<ltW ^^ 'W^SR - 2-1 Counsel for the petitioner been relieved so far. He prays for st{ In view ofthe facts and oirdumstances if the petitioner is not relieved) representation is decided. With the aforesaid observati^ns, Consequently M.W.P.No. 44( Certified copy as per rules.' ^lso submits-fhat the petitioner has not bvoftransferorder. . . ofthe case, it is directed fhat .A '• he be allowed to continue till the «hWfc1<ilt *<W<'i>' 'Ef'fygt <fS|*^l< i? affipi ss^y this petition stands disposed of. 02/2004 also standsdisposgd o£.; Sd/- F^khruddin Judge 'li':il