IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44705 of 2009 SIDHNATH KUMAR @ RAJU @ RAJIV KUMAR SON OF SRI UMESH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 6.1.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner being the husband had taken all steps to save the life of the deceased and, therefore, the submission is that it is not a case u/s.304B I.P.C., let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 20.3.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa (Nalanda) in Hilsa P.s.case No.439 of 2008, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )