pvr １ wp1837 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODG)NO.1837 OF 2011 1.Raj Transport & Anr. ...Petitioners vs. 1.The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents --- Mr.D.D.Madan, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sanjay Jain i/b. Nivit Srivastava, for Petitioners. Ms.Geeta Shastri, for Respondent no.1. Ms.S.V.Deshmukh, for Respondent no.2. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 30th August,2011. P.C.:- 1. Heard. It is purely the field of the contract. Even assuming that the respondents are committing breach of the contract entered into with the petitioners, the remedy of the petitioners to sue for damages or to adopt appropriate remedy under the pvr ２ wp1837 Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Writ petition is not the remedy. The petition is, therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.)