IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 15758 of 2004 Between: The Anaparthy Cultural and Rythu Club, rep. by its President K. Suresh Kumar, S/o Rama Rao, aged 37 years, R/o Old Town Anaparthy, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ramachandrapuram, E.G. District. 2 The Station House Officer, Anaparthy, E.G. District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering the lawful activities of the petitioners Association namely the Anaparthy Cultural and Rythu Club situated at Old Town, Anaparthy, Anaparthy, E.G. District as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere of lawful activities of the petitioners association. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.BOKKASATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: Petitioner claims to be a Society registered under the A.P. Societies Registration Act, 2001, with the object of providing necessary information to the members for cultivation and conducting rapport among the Agricultural Officers and Ryths and for the purpose of conducting cultural activities among the members. This writ petition is filed alleging that the respondents-Police Officials have been threatening the members of the petitioner-Society and interfering with their activities without there being any justifiable reason. Accordingly, a declaration has been sought for by the petitioner- society that the alleged action of the respondents in interfering with its lawful activities is arbitrary and illegal. On behalf of the respondents, Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police, Anaparthy Police Station, East Godavari District, filed a counter affidavit denying all the allegations made by the petitioner. It is specifically stated that at no point of time, the members of the petitioner-society were threatened and that the petitioner-society did not come to adverse notice so far and as such the question of taking any action against the petitioner-Society by the respondents does not arise. In the light of the averments made in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, there is no need for any adjudication in the writ petition on merits. Accordingly, recording the statements made in the counter affidavit filed by the Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police, Anaparthy Police Station, East Godavari District, writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ____________ 20-09-2004 klp To 1 The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ramachandrapuram, E.G. District. 2 The Station House Officer, Anaparthy, E.G. District. 3 2CCs to G.P. for Home, High Court buildings, Hyderabad.(OUT). 4 2CD copies