IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.8266 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 20.12.2010 Hamander Singh ....Petitioner Versus M/s United Gram Udyog Samiti ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Brijeshwar Singh Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The instant revision petition has been filed impugning the order dated 10.12.2010. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent has misrepresented the facts and therefore its written statement cannot be considered by the Court. It is his contention that in view of the vacillating stand regarding the ownership of the proprietorship concern of the respondent where he has represented himself variously, learned trial court was precluded from taking into consideration the written statement itself. I am afraid the contention of the petitioner is misplaced. All the questions that have been raised before the learned trial court C.R.No.8266 of 2010 (O&M) -2- as also herein are matters to be decided on the basis of evidence. The trial Court has not foreclosed the option of the petitioner to raise all the relevant objections pertaining to the status and stand of the respondent. In this view of the matter, the revision petition is held to be without any merit and is dismissed. The petitioner may take all these objections at the appropriate stage before the learned trial court and in such an eventuality the learned trial court shall answer such objections on the basis of the evidence before it. 20.12.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss