IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 27TH OCTOBER 2009 / 5TH KARTHIKA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 1140 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.1167/2009 Dated 13/01/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): /PETITIONER --------------- C.RAMAN NAIR, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, 70 YEARS, CHEMMANDA HOUSE, ARIMBOOR P.O., THRISSUR BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI SMT.ALTHEA EDWINA ROZARIO RESPONDENT(S): /2ND RESPONDENT --------------- P.R.RENJAN, ( AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. MS.ANU SIVARAMAN, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- COC No.1140 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 27th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T Complaint in this Contempt of Court Case is regarding non- compliance of the directions in the judgment in WP(C) No.1167/2009, which was disposed of on 13/01/2009 directing the Secretary, RTA, Thrissur to pass orders on Ext.P4. 2. In the statement i.e. filed, it is reported that in compliance with the directions in the judgment, order dated 21/02/2009 was passed, and it is also confessed that the said order was not communicated to the petitioner, and was communicated to him only on 10/10/2009. 3. Though belated, still having regard to the fact that the order has been passed in compliance with the directions in the judgment in WP(C) No.1167/2009 dated 13/01/2009 and communicated to the petitioner, this Contempt of Court Case is closed leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue remedies, if he is aggrieved by the said order. This Contempt of Court Case is closed accordingly. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg