IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 12162 of 2008 Decided on: 23.2.2011 Smt. Poonam Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. H.K. Paul, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1, 3 and 4. None for respondents No. 2 and 5. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. H.K. Paul, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to the subsequent developments, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge February 23, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?