IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 3119 of 2005 Date of decision:- 21.08.2009 Shokat Ali ...Appellant Versus Narinder Manocha ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER Present: Mr. Shokat Ali, appellant in person with Mr. Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishal Garg, Advocate. Mr. Narinder Manocha, respondent in person with Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate. SHAM SUNDER J. The appellant (plaintiff) duly assisted by his Counsel submits that he has no connection with property, bearing No. 97, in possession of the respondent. He further submits that he will not interfere into his possession over property No. 97. 2. The respondent (defendant), duly assisted by his Counsel, submits that he has no connection with property bearing No. 843, in dispute, in possession of the appellant. He further submits that he will not interfere into his possession, over property No. 843. 3. Both the Counsel for the parties submit that the appeal be -2- accepted and the judgements and decrees of the Courts below, be modified accordingly. 4. In view of the above, the appeal is accepted. The judgements and decrees of the Courts below, are modified, in the manner that the respondent shall not interfere into the possession of the appellant, in respect of property No. 843, in dispute, and the appellant shall not interfere into the possession of the respondent over property No. 97. Disposed of. August 21, 2009 (SHAM SUNDER) vj/amodh JUDGE