IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2011 / 2ND ASHADHA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 4787 of 2011() ----------------------------- CMP.4485/2011 of J.M.F.C., S. PARAVOOR CRIME NO. 611/2011 of PARAVOOR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1:- ---------------------------------- UNNI @ KATTUNNI, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O. JOSEPH, MOOLAVILA PADINJATTATHIL VEEDU, KURUMANDAL CHERRY, PARAVUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT (A1). BY ADV. SRI.V.VENUGOPALAN NAIR RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENT:- ------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARAVUR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT. ADV. MR. C.S. HRITHWIK, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................................... Bail Application No. 4787 of 2011 ..................................................... Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2011. ORDER Petitioner, who is the first accused in Crime No.611 of 2011 of Paravoor Police Station, Kollam for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 326 and 308 r/w Section 149 I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 08.05.2011. The petitioner was arrested on 10.05.2011. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending inter alia that the petitioner is involved in five other crimes and in the present case also he had cut the injured with a sword resulting in three cut injuries and fracture of mandable. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioner, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making B.A. No. 4787/2011 : 2: himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. sd/- V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv