THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.9759 OF 2005 DATED 18th FEBRUARY, 2011 BETWEEN: Bega Narasimha Rao … Petitioner A n d The Executive Officer, Sri Rama Divya Kshetra Township, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District And another. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.9759 OF 2005 O R D E R The petitioner, a resident of Bhadrachalam in Khammam District, filed the present writ petition assailing the action of Sri Rama Divya Kshetra Township, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District, first respondent herein, in interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment over his properties in Sy.No.20/95 situated in Kalyana Mandapam Area, Ward No.10, Bhadrachalam Town and Mandal, Khammam District. This Court, by order dated 27.04.2005, directed the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner’s possession in respect of the property in question without following the due process of law. The petitioner claims to be the owner and possessor of an extent of Ac.2-00 cents of land in Sy.No.20/95 of Bhadrachalam Town and Mandal, Khammam District. It is his case that owing to his disputes with the second respondent herein, the second respondent approached the first respondent whereupon, the first respondent started interfering with his possession over the subject property. He accordingly filed the present writ petition seeking protection of his rights in respect of the subject property. Though the matter has been pending on the file of this Court for nearly six years, no counter has been filed by the respondents. The second respondent did not even choose to put in his appearance in person or through counsel despite service of notice. Sri P.Raghavender Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent, on instructions, stated that the writ petition was founded on apprehension and that there was no cause of action for the petitioner to have approached this Court. He further stated that the first respondent did not have any occasion to interfere with the petitioner’s possession over the subject properties and in the event any such occasion arises, the first respondent would follow the due procedure laid down by law. Recording the above stand put forth by the first respondent through its counsel, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. -------------------------- SANJAY KUMAR,J 18th FEBRUARY, 2011 PGS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.9759 OF 2005 18th FEBRUARY, 2011