PETITIONER RESPONDENTS x / 1. CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2005 ( Dr.{Mrs) Durga Kosam W/o Dr. Ajay Kosam, aged about 31 yéars resident Flat No.205, Idgah Chowk, Bilaspur Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Secretaxy Department of Higher Education D.K.S. Building Raipur (C.G.} Th6 Registrar, Guru Ghasidas University, Bilaspur , Tahsil and District Bilaspur {CG}. The Vice Chancellor Guru Ghasidas University, Bilaspur Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG). DEAN, Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Science (CIMS) Bilaspur (CG). ’ f a mmqi$ ..................... . ........ ..... mzao WWWW wf wyz. 03b an’éelm (gafa’sla) Shn' Akhil Agrawal P211161 Lawyér for tho Stato of Chhattisgarh on advance co py. This matter relate$ 1.0 Guru Ghansida$,UniV€r$itV. Shm‘ Manindra Shrivastava, Senor Advocate, who appears usually for Guru Ghansidas University is requested by this Court to accept notice. He honours the request of this Court and accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 2, 3 81,4. He is making his presence with . Shn' Afroz Khan, Advocate H Shri Sameer Behar, Earned counsel for the p€fitionen r respondent Nos.2, 3 85 4. Heard. The case of the pe tioner is that vide an advertisement No.GGU/REGR./2005/415 ated 22/01/2005 of Guru Ghansidas University, Bilapsur (C. .), applications were called for appointment to various po ts. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner had also appli d for the post of Lecturer in the department of Anaestheseol gy, CIMS of this University Considering hé‘r can idature, a call letter dated 4/8/2005 (Annexm‘e 13-4) was issued o the pen'tioner and she was called for interview on 13/8/2005at 1 PM. at College Council Hall, CIMS, Bilaspur. Learned counsel rher submits that the interview was taken on the said date, b t even after the inteiview taken on 13/8/2005 the result the interview was not being communicated to the petiti ner. He also submits that the other candidates who had app f r f e a am %#m ama$am w ammNw%aa§w . $m Hwm@ m§& &@R $3$%qa¢a 21/ 10/2005 XI~HC~78 anésrm mafm) mamm . mmam WWW#%@W aiwma mmm anéev ’11 gives example of 0116 Dr, Rakesh er dated 28/ 9/ 2005 ‘haS been filed as the petitioner is that the petitioner the reeuit of the aforesaid intewiew. F made by learned counsel for the ir the State as well as learned counsel versitv and ' rauthorities of the x Certified copy of this order is filed ritV of the University, the concerned :sult of the aforesaid interview to the 15 days fromihe date of production of appoiHtmEnt lett€rs. Nigam. His appointment 0rd Annexure P—S. The limited prayer of ‘must also be informed about To this limited praye petitioner, lealned counsel fe appearing on behalf of Uni University have no objection. The prayer is allowed. It is directed that if z before the concerned autho authoritv shail inform the rt petitioner within a period of the certified copy of this ordt . With the above observations, this petition stands finally disposed of at this stage. CC as per rules. Sunil Kumar Sinha mam-a; MXOT .3? mzoo