IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2008 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1930 W.P(C).No. 12509 of 2008(L) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- THOMAS P.OOMMEN, PALLUVIRUTHIL HOUSE, KIZHAKKUMBHAGOM P.O., NIRANAM, THIRUVALLA. BY ADV. SRI.BABU CHERUKARA RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. KADAPRA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, NIRANAM P.O., THIRUVALLA, REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR FOR R.2 SMT.PRIYA S.RANI FOR R.2 GOVT. PLEADER, SMT. K.R. DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 12509 OF 2008 L ==================== Dated this the 13th day of June, 2008 J U D G M E N T The alleged inaction on Ext.P1 by the 1st respondent is the complaint in this writ petition. According to the petitioner, certain quantity of wheat supplied under the SGRY scheme has been misappropriated. It is stated that on this allegation, he has filed Ext.P1 before the 1st respondent and that action has not been taken by the 1st respondent. 2. Having regard to the above allegations, all that is needed to be done in this writ petition is to direct the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1 complaint of the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the 1st respondent shall take up, consider and pass orders on Ext.P1, if the same has been received and is pending. This shall be done only with notice to the 2nd respondent. The aforesaid process shall be completed within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp