IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR Writ Appeal No. 375 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 29/02/2008 in Writ Petition No. 27397 of 2007 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1) C. Ramu S/o. C. Krishnaiah, TTD, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 2) E. Himagiri S/o. E. Bhaskar, TTD, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 3) M. Sudhakarudu S/o. M. Munirathnam Naidu, TTD, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 4) Y. Srinivasa Murthy S/o. Y. Venkatappaiah, TTD, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 5) S. Sreedhara Varma S/o.S. Govindarajulu, TTD, Tirupati, Chittoor District. ... APPELLANTS AND 1) Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupati, Rep. by its Executive Officer 2) Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupati, Rep. by its Executive Officer (Services), TTD Devasthanams, Tirupati. 3) The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department, Secretariat, A.P. Hyderabad. 4) M. Kedarnath, Draughtsman Grade-II Electrical O/o. Deputy Executive Engineer (Elec. East), TTD, Tirumala. 5) P. Venkataramaiah Draughtsman Grade-II, Electrical O/o.Deputy Executive Engineer (Elec. South), TTD, Tirumala. 6) Smt. P. Sarada, Draughtsman Grade-II, Electrical O/o.Deputy Executive Engineer (Elec. I) TTD , Tirumala. 7) The Director of Technical Education, A.P, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: DR.K.LAKSHMI NARASIMHA Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: MR.A.K. JAYAPRAKASH Counsel for Respondent No.3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for Respondent Nos.4 to 7: NOT NECESSARY PARTIES Counsel for Respondent Nos.8 & 9: MR.K. RAMAKANTH REDDY The Court made the following: Judgment: (Per Shri Anil R. Dave, Chief Justice) 1. During the pendency of the appeal, substantial material in the nature of counter-aﬃdavits has been placed on record. 2. In our opinion, the learned Single Judge can consider the said material while taking ﬁnal decision in the writ petition because the hearing of the writ petition had been adjourned for the purpose of getting some more information. 3. In view of the above development in the matter, the material, which has been placed on record of this appeal, be placed before the learned Single Judge so that the learned Judge can take final decision in the writ petition. 4. In view of the above observation, the appeal stands disposed of with no order as to costs. 5. Writ Petition No.27397 of 2007 shall be notiﬁed for hearing before the learned Single Judge on 10.9.2008. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ August 27, 2008 VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J svs ........REGISTRAR To 1. 2.2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WA {VSMI}