SBCWP NO.6406/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6406/2010. Mahendra Kumar Versus The Chairman & M.D. Vijay Bank & Ors. Date of Order:- May 5, 2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Rajesh Gadhwal for the petitioner. ***** BY THE COURT:- Grievance of the petitioner is that he has been denied appointment on compassionate ground even though his father while serving the respondents died on 8/12/1998. It is contended that petitioner immediately applied for compassionate appointment on 30/11/1999. Petitioner then made number of similar applications. Respondents initially considered case of the petitioner and informed him vide letter dated 16/3/2000 that at present, scheme for grant of appointment on compassionate ground has been kept under suspension and he is not a position to entertain any such application. Petitioner made many more such representations and lastly on 18/3/2009 he was informed that respondent-bank was not in a position to entertain application of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground. Learned counsel for petitioner has referred to new direction SBCWP NO.6406/10. 2 published in the newspaper Daily Rajasthan Patrika issued on 16/12/2008 to show that in the settlement arrived at between the Indian Bank Association and Employees Association of Banks, a consensus was reached for giving compassionate appointment to the dependents of the employees of the bank who died in harness. Even otherwise, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that respondents have not assigned any reason why the respondent-Bank has decided not to give such appointment to the petitioner. Having regard to the facts aforestated, I deem it appropriate to require the petitioner to make a fresh representation to the Chairman & M.D. Vijay Bank Bangalore, who shall in the light of the facts aforenoted, consider such representation and dispose of the same by a detailed speaking order. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil