IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.540 of 2011 Smt.Samundari Devi wife of Krit Nonia, resident of village – Siris, P.O.- Barun, district Aurangabad at present residing at Central Colony, Marcauli Colliery PO + PS Marcauli, dist- Giridih ( Jharkhand) .....Appellant Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Chief Secretary of Bihar, Patna 2. The Collector- cum- District Magistrate, Aurangabad 3. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Aurangabad 4. The Anchal Adhikari, Barun, Aurangabad 5. Ravi Gunjan, son of Vijay Kumar Sinha, resident of village + PO Siris, PS Barun, district Aurangabad at present residing at Mohalla New Area M.G. Road, Ward No.5 ( opposite J.K. Hotel) P.S.- Town Aurangabad, District Aurangabad ( Bihar) ......Respondents ----------- 4 09-05-2011 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State. This appeal under Clause 10 of Letters Patent has been preferred against the judgement and order of learned Single Judge exercising power of superintendence under Article 227 of Constitution of India in respect of an order passed by learned Munsif, Aurangabad in a title suit. Normally, in matters governed by Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) the parties have to seek remedy within the four walls of the Code and writ petition is not entertained. However, in view of severe restrictions on the revisional power u/s 115 of the Code brought about through recent amendment, the matter has been settled that in 2 appropriate cases even if the remedy for civil review is not available, the party may invoke power of this court under Article 227 of Constitution of India for seeking relief. Clause 10 of Letters Patent of this court is absolutely clear that no appeal would lie against order of a learned Single Judge either in exercise of civil revisional power or against an order passed in exercise of power of superintendence which is now under Article 227 of Constitution of India. Although, the writ petition was labelled under Article 226 of Constitution of India, it has to be treated as one under Article 227 of Constitution of India. In the facts of the case, it is clear that this appeal is not maintainable. It is dismissed accordingly. BKS/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)