?' HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISfeUtH AT BIUWUR W.P.fO NB. 2064 of 2007 Single Bench-.Hon'ble Shri Snliah K. <<gnihotri. J. Petilianer : M/S MIU.ANIUM BHILAI TRA&ERS PRIVATC LIAUTEl). Registered Office- Office-B-34, Akash 6onga Complex, Supeln, Bhild, Tah. A Ustt. Durg (C.6.) "Through - Rqjesh Dhody, bii'ector, oged about 49 years, R/o 4, Atelviya Nagor, burg, Tah. & Distt. Du-9 yj6.) Rcspondents Versus 1. Municipal Corporotwn Supelo Bhilafc Toh. A t>istt. &ur9 (CJ6.) Through - Comroissioner. 2. &istrictRegistraraidColfasc1wof Sftnnps, &ur9 Tah. A&istt. (C.S.) 3. Smt. 5.8. Ahmed W/0 Shri Borimr Ahmed, Proprietor, T<y Errtwprises R/o 10, Ayeppa N090?, Bhilai, Toh. & Distt. Ourg (C.6.) 4. Mr. Muahtuq Ahmed Aged dbout 39 yeors, S/o Mr. Baahir Ahmed. R/o tO Ayeppa Nagor, Bhiku, Toh. & Oistt. &W9 (CjB.) Prescnt: Mr. V.6. Tnmaskar, Advocate for the petitionw. Ms. Oeepnli Ponctey, Ponel l.aNf/er for the St<rte. OR&ER passed onS* Ooy of April. 2007) 1. Leamed eounsel appearing for Ihe petitioner submits tiiot the petitioner hos filed <n opplieation before the Depirty Regisfru' under the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908 for re9is1ratton of Memonwichim of underst'anding OWOU) be1«»ecn(Wtittona'Compay cnd the respondents No. 3 ond 4. s ;>'^^^^^ ^^s^&^ 2. The Oistrict Registnr. Durg vtetetetlw dated %.01.2007 (Annexure P-12) has dedined to re9ister •the same with on observation thutIhe sdd docunients cai be produced before -the Sub Registnr for registration aid in eeae the Sub-Registnr finds that the Stomp duty pcu'd is lesser Ihan ttie required amount, thc Sub-Re9iatr<r, after redizing Ihe oppropriat'e Stcunp t)uty, can register •the Memorondum of understanding (MOU). 3. Beiiy aggrieved, the petitioner has fited •this petition.Section 28 of the Rc9istrart'ion Act, 1908 whteh ctearly prwides tho* every document mentioned in sectton 17, sifc-section (l), ekusw (a), (b), (c) 2[, (d) and (e), section 17, sub-section (2), insofor as such document cffects immovable property,] and sectton 18, clatBes (a), (b) 3[(c) and (cc),] shall be prescnted for registrotion in the offlce of a Sub- Registror within whose sub-district the «»hoteor some portion of Ihe property -to iihich such document relotes is situot'e. 4. 'The order passed by the District Registwr is perfectly volhl and in accordonce with the provisions of kw. I do not flnd any merits in the cose. Thus, the iwit petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agmhow Judge Subhash