HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4552 of 2008 Dated: 29.10.2010 Between: Shaik Nagula Meera. …..Petitioner And The District Collector, Warangal District & others. …..Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4552 of 2008 ORDER : In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks directions by way of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents in not stopping the illegal and unauthorized constructions being made by the 4th respondent in the property belonging to the petitioner in an extent of 230 sq. yards of land, covered by Sy.No.466, situated at Maripeda village and Mandal of Warangal District, as illegal and arbitrary. It is the case of the petitioner that she is the absolute owner and possessor of the aforesaid 230 sq. yards of land, having purchased the same vide registered document No.885 of 2007, dated 21.02.2007, from its previous owner Sri Limbavat Chakru. It is the grievance of the petitioner that although she is the owner and possessor of the aforesaid land, respondent No.4 is making illegal constructions in the said land, the 3rd respondent- Sarpanch is not taking any action on such illegal constructions. The 3rd respondent-Sarpanch has filed a detailed counter affidavit. In the counter, while denying the various allegations made by the petitioner, it is stated that the 4th respondent has purchased the land in question with tin shed, in the year 2007, and the same is in Sy.No.465 in an extent of 263 Sq. yards. The respondents have denied the allegation of the petitioner that the 4th respondent has made illegal constructions in the said land. It is also stated that in view of the representation filed by the petitioner, notices were issued to the 4th respondent, who submitted all the documents before the Grampanchayat for verification and after careful examination of the documents filed by the 4th respondent and the petitioner herein, the Grampanchayat has found that there is no basis for the claim of the petitioner for purchase of the land, as the vendor of the petitioner was not having any land in Sy.No.466. In view of the averments made in the counter affidavit, it is a factual dispute with regard to title and possession of the land in question, and as it is stated that no illegal constructions are being made by the 4th respondent in the land belonging to the petitioner, no directions can be granted as prayed for in this writ petition. For the aforesaid reasons, the writ petition is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 29th October 2010. ajr