@ 1N THE HIGH CUU " OF CHHA’H‘ISGAKH ; BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 993 oi Petitloner Kundan Kumar Paid, S/o Snatrughan Plaiiatiff Patel, Agsz? ahaut 29 ysar , R/o.. Villana Chhjipawag, Tahsii 6a Distt. Mahasamunc‘l m \""J'/ F ) ’varsus Raspondents 1. DAN": mm. Mnap Goichha, Sic. Heeralal Golchha, Thsksdar, Collsg'c’ Rsad, I‘Aahasam 1nd, Tahsil ("S5 Distt. Mahasamuud (C.G.') Bad“viShal Dwivedi, Sfo. Sangamlal Dwivat‘ii, Tinmkwiper, Lek N’uman Vibhag, (Bhawan ’5:- Sadak) Mahasamund, Tahsil Maha$amum1 Dis u. Mahasalnund (CA1) Shriman Kalvapalan Yan‘m‘, LoK Nixman Vibhag {Bhawas &, Sadak), P.4&hasamund Sambhag, Distt. Mahasamund (6.6.) Sub~divisional Officsr, Lek Nirmzm Vibhag (Bhawan {is Sadak), Mahasamund $ambhag, Tahsil Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) 8mm 0f Cimattisgarh, Through — Collector. Mahasamund, Diétt. Mehasamtmd (C.G.) 5. C:a WRIT PE’i‘I’l‘ON UNDER ARTICLE 226i227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Honjbie Shn' Satish K. Agnmotri d.) Shri Maggi Pamnjps, Advovate. far L115 pstitisnsr. and. 5. Sim Raiendi‘a Agalwai, Palm} Lawyer for 111$ respomisnts No. '3, 4 Norm for the Isspondents No. i and 2. ”HPYWP‘D (Passed on this 18m day of October. 2008) Leanmd counsel appealing for ma petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner seeks to wmldraw Luis peu‘tion on the ground that the fmal decree has already been passed. 2. Lealned counsel appealing for the respondents] State has no objection. CG In View of the above, the petltion is dismissed as withdrawn, as having become infructuous. Consequently, M(W)P No. 79012005 and other pending applications are aiso dismissed. Sdl- ‘zSatish K. Agnihotri: J Judge Thakur \ /. ’u. / ' ’ 2 O