IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 232 of 2010 Dr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey …..Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …..Respondents. Present : Ms. Prabha Naithani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.P. Joshi, Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent no. 2. Ms. Farida Siddiquie, Standing Counsel for the Union of India/respondent no. 3. Ms. Beena Pande, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh/respondent no. 4. Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, CJ Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Barin Ghosh, C.J. (Oral) 1. The learned counsel for the Union of India has produced the appropriate records in terms of the earlier order of this Court. Let those be kept with the record. It appears to be the contention of Union of India contained in its letter dated 6.10.2010 addressed to the learned Additional Central Government Standing Counsel that by the final allocation order dated 29.5.2005 issued by the Central Government, allocation for the State of Uttarakhand was completed and in the said order the name of the petitioner did not feature. According to the said letter dated 6.10.2010, this implies that the petitioner has been allocated to the State of Uttar Pradesh. 2. The learned Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State of Uttarakhand has also acknowledged the fact that the petitioner has been allocated to the State of Uttar Pradesh. 3. In such view of the matter, we dispose of this writ petition by directing the State of Uttarakhand to release the petitioner as quickly as possible but not later than one month from the date of service of a copy of this order upon the Principal Secretary, Medical Health, Dehradun in order to enable the petitioner to join the State of Uttar Pradesh. 4. It goes without saying that while relieving the petitioner, his final claim should be settled and paid. 5. The writ petition is thus disposed of. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 08.10.2010 Avneet