IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO.25543 OF 2011 SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH @ LALLU THAKUR @ LOLU THAKUR, SON OF SRI SHEOJI SINGH, R/O VILL- NETHUA, P.S.- MARHAURA, DISTRICT- SARAN AT CHAPRA VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ---------------------------------- 2 02/08/2011 Heard Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27of the Arms Act. The informant Sunita Devi in her fard-beyan alleged that three persons on a motorcycle were seen escaping after killing her husband Bachha Singh. The informant has identified two persons. The motive was that the informant’s husband had been to custody in a case registered under the provisions of the Prevention of Atrocities on SC/ST Act. Submission is that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. The police after investigation submitted final form against the FIR named accused persons and other persons were chargesheeted by the police. The trial proceeded against Dablu, Lal Mohan, Saroj and Chandan in which Vishal Kumar, Kushmila Devi, Harendra singh and Sunita Devi were examined as witnesses and they have stated that those very persons are accused who were named in the FIR. 2 Further submission is that the petitioner without any rhyme or reasons was made accused only at the instance of the police officials. There was no evidence against him except the fact that he is accused in some false cases. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge/concerned Court, Saran at Chapra in Sessions Trial No. 380 of 2011 arising out of Marhaura P.S. Case No. 92 of 2009. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)