IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24254 of 2011 ============================================= Kiran Raj Kumar Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Raj Kumar Bhagwat Singh .... .... Opposite Party/s ============================================= 4 13-10-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Cancellation is sought solely on the ground that stay order was passed in a quashing proceeding earlier to this petition appears technical in nature only. Purpose of anticipatory bail and quashing application are similar in nature to save from any coercive step towards arrest. On merit, petitioner was found entitle for anticipatory bail, in case, quashing petition is dismissed, there is no way to obtain anticipatory bail in a day. So, I find no merit to cancel the bail granted to the Opposite Party No.2. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner for cancellation of bail of Opposite Party No.2 is dismissed. Shailendra Bhushan Prasad/- (Mandhata Singh, J.)