IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 3RD JANUARY 2008 / 13TH POUSHA 1929 WA.No. 3020 of 2007 --------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.15852/2007 Dated 31/05/2007 .................... APPELLANT/3RD PARTY ----------------------------------- VASUMATHI, CHEMBAKASSERY HOUSE, BOOTHAKULAM P.O., PARAVUR, KOLLAM-691302. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A.KRISHNAVENI, CHEMBAKASSERY HOUSE, BOOTHAKULAM P.O., PARAVUR, KOLLAM-691302. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOLLAM. 6. A.LALITHA DAS, CHEMBAKASSERY HOUSE, BOOTHAKULAM P.O., PARAVUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. W.A.NO. 3020/07 7. A.VENUGOPAL, CHEMBAKASSERY HOUSE, BOOTHAKULAM P.O., PARAVUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 8. A.UDAYAKUMARI, CLERK, CHEMBAKASSERY HIGH SCHOOL, BOOTHAKULAM P.O., PARAVUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. R1 BY ADV. SRI. ELVIN PETER P.J R2 TO R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.P. SREEKRISHNAN. R6 BY ADV. SRI. P. GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L. DATTU, CJ. & K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------------------- W. A. NO. 3020 OF 2007 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd January, 2008 JUDGMENT H. L. DATTU, C.J: A consent order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C). No.15852/07 dated 31.5.2007 is called in question by yet another party, who is of the view that the consent order so passed will affect her rights and interest. 2. In our view, if the appellant is of the opinion that the consent order so passed by the learned Single Judge would affect her interest, she can file an appropriate petition/application before the very same learned Single Judge for appropriate reliefs. In that view of the matter, we do not see any reason to entertain this Writ Appeal. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is disposed of. However, liberty is reserved to the appellant to make an appropriate petition before the learned Single Judge for appropriate reliefs. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk/DK.