HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2354 of 2006 Petitioner Chhamman Lal Soni Aged - 60 years, Son of Late Atma Ram Soni Posted as - Upper Division Teacher, At - S.S. Kalibadi Hr. Sec. School, Kalibadi, Raipur, District - Raipur P.Gj R/o Chhattisgarh Nagar, In front of Shw MandirGali, Tikarapara, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) Veraus Respondents The State of Chhattis^rh Through- The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur The Director, Pub'ic Instrucfions, Chhatttsgarti HMd Quarter at - Raipur. The Goveming Body of Kalibadi Shiksha Samiti, Through-its School Secretary, S.S. Kali Badl Hr. Sec. School, Kalibadi, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A - 226 & 227 OF THE CWSTITUTION OF \HDW. SB: Hon'ble Justiee Shri Satisrfi K. Agnihotri 1. 2 3 Present: Mr. R.K. Kesharwani. Advocate forthe p^ttioner. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel lawyer for th®respondents Ne. 1 and 2/State. ORDER (Passed on this 16"* day of April, 2007) 1. The quesUon of law involved herein is whether ttie non-teaching staff working in Govemment aided schoel are entiUed to ttie bansflt of recommendah'ons of the Fifth Pay Commisston under Uie |»ovisionsof the Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Sitehan SansUia ^dhyapakon Tatha Anya Karmchariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya) Adhint^m, 1978 (hencefortti the Adhiniyam, 1978') and th®rutes made thereunder read vdth the Madhya Pradesh Revision of Pay Rutes, 1988 (henceforth "the Pay Rules, 1MS'). ~\ \ ^ Leamed counsel appearing for the pditioncr submits that the terms and conditions of the tetching and non-teaching staff are govemed by the same provistons of lawwhich wsre under consideraUon by this Court in the matter of Smt. A. Lall vs. State of CMiatUsgarh and other connected matters (W.P. No. 4108 of 200^, wherein by ttie ju^mant and orcta- dated 6^.2007, thte Court held ttiat the pdMonere who are woricing in fally Government aided private schools are enWed to Uie revised pay-scates with effect from 1.1.1996 as prescribed under the Pay Rules, 1988. This Court further Tor the purpose <s/f paymer* of aweare had granted certatn direcBon. Admfttedly and jointty, it is submitted by the parttes that tfife msWer is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 passed by this Court fn the case of Smt. A. Lall vs. State of Chhrttisgarti and other connected matters (Supra). As a result, for the reasons stated in the JudgmeW and order dated e.2.2007 passed in W.P. No. 4108 of 2005 (Smt. A. Lall vs. aate of Chhatttegarh and other connected mattere) (Supra), the writ petftton is altowed in the same terms and condftions. SatishK. Agnihotrl Judge V-^kw ^v.\ .