IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.26300 of 2010 DHARMENDRA YADAV, son of Bihari Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 01.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 395 and 364 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the First Information Report. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the victim Lalan Pandey, after his recovery does not name the petitioner in his statement under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. However, after five days he named this petitioner also, as a person, who is keeping vigil and one of the places where he was confined, in the statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. The petitioner is in custody for more than 2 years and 3 months. Counsel for the State submits that that petitioner has subsequently been made accused in another case as well. In the circumstances, petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. case no. 28 of 2007, with 2 the condition the petitioner would report to nearby police station once every two months and will file an affidavit to this effect in the court below. Anjani/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)