IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32786 of 2009 MANTOO YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 14.09.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a Police case under Sections 457 & 380 of the Penal Code since 30.5.2009. The submission is that the FIR is against unknown. There is no recovery from him. The only material is his alleged confession before the police. The impugned order of rejection notices that he was seen loitening near the place of occurrence and he has antecedents of six cases. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Nishi Kant Thakur, Judicial Magistrate, 2nd Class, Bhagalpur in connection with Kotwali (Tilkamanjhi) P.S. Case No. 150 of 2009. Both the sureties must be his father and mother respectively, whose photograph and proof of residence shall be appended to the bail bonds. He shall be bound to be properly represented on each date and also required to be physically present on dates that the court below so directs. In the event of his defaulting under either head, the court - 2 - below shall be at liberty to deal with him appropriately in accordance with law, quite apart from its liberty to proceed against the sureties. If during the pendency of the present trial the petitioner is involved in any fresh case, quite apart from the fresh prosecution that may be initiated, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of the present bail also. DKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)