IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.1708 of 2010 Date of Decision.04.08.2011 Corporation Bank, a Body Corporate and a Nationalized Bank under the provisions of the Banking Companies (Acquisitions and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 .....Petitioner Versus Union of India, Department of Consumer Affairs at Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi-110001 through its Secretary and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Aalok Jagga, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Karminder Singh, CGC for respondent No.1. Mr. Anil Malhotra, Advocate Amicus Curiae. None for other respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Mr. Malhotra, Amicus Curiae states that he was appointed as Amicus to assist the Court for dealing with the issue of whether a remedy was possible under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act for an auction purchaser and the tenability of approaching Consumer Forum for redressal. 2. The matter will be considered at an appropriate time in some other case. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the matter has been compromised between the parties (Annexure P-6) and seeks for withdrawal of the writ petition as such. 4. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 04, 2011 Pankaj*