IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 16163 of 1999 Between: Uniford Laboratories, Rep. by its Managing Partner, P.V.Suresh Babu, S/o.P.Mohan Rao, Nellore. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Sudhakar Patnaik S/o.MNM Patnaik, R/o.49-24-18, Ramakrishna Nagar, Visakhapatnam. disd. for default as per court order dt:13.3.03 as against R1 2 The Industrial Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.V.SUDHAKAR REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a writ of Prohibition to prohibit respondent No.2 from proceeding with M.P.No.28 of 1997 filed by respondent No.1, without deciding the objections filed by the petitioner in I.A.No.161 of 1999. Heard Sri V.Sudhakar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner. A perusal of the record shows that the petitioner was given four weeks time by this Court on 13.03.2003 for complying with the office objections regarding payment of batta subject to the condition that non-compliance with the objections within the permitted time would automatically result in dismissal of the writ petition against respondent No.1. As admittedly the order, dated 13.03.2003, was not complied with, the writ petition stood dismissed against respondent No.1 and the same was recorded in the file by the Registry on 16.04.2003. In view of the same, as writ petition was dismissed against respondent No.1, the cause of action does not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition, interim order, dated 02.08.1999, is vacated and WPMP.No.19946 of 1999 is dismissed. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated:30.12.2008 GJ