1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 915 OF 2009 Shaikh Mohammed Khalid ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. P.M. Havnur i/by Ms. Nayana G. Pardeshi for the Petitioner Mrs. P.H. Kantharia, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: OCTOBER 5, 2009 P.C.:- The petitioner’s grievance was that during the night on a particular day, there was some gas emission, which caused problems for the petitioner, and as a result, a child also died. 2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that on investigation, the police did not find that the death of the child 2 was because of emission of gas, and they have filed an “A summary” report before the learned Magistrate, which means that the allegations were true but could not be detected. Since “A Summary” report has been filed, the Magistrate is expected to issue a notice to the complainant and the Magistrate, if satisfied that the case needs further investigation, is not powerless to give such direction. 3. In this view of the matter, we dispose of this petition, giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Magistrate. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J.