IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1626 of 2009 ARJUN SHARMA son of Late Ram Lakhan Singh Resident of Village-Khaira, P.S. kauakole, District Nawadah. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.The Collector Cum Administrative Officer, the Nawadah Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Nawada. 3.The Managing Director, Nawadah Central Cooperative Bank, Ltd. Nawadah P.S. and District Nawadah. ----------- 3 10-02-2010 I.A. No.8615 of 2009. This is an application for condonation of delay of 66 days. Mr. Purushottam Jha, learned counsel for the respondents has no objection for condonation of delay. Accordingly application for condonation of delay is allowed. I.A. is accordingly disposed of. L.P.A. no.1626 of 2009. As we have condoned delay, we are inclined to take up the appeal for admission. In this intra-court appeal assail is to the order dated 11.02.2009 passed in Civil Review No.17 of 2008, whereby learned Single Judge has allowed application for review by reviewing order dated 02.11.2007 passed 2 in C.W.J.C. No.12283 of 2001 whereby she has directed for payment of salary during the period of suspension along with two increments. It is worth noting, application for review has been allowed as it was brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge that order of punishment was passed against the delinquent officer in a departmental proceeding which was not mentioned in the writ petition. While allowing application for review the learned Single Judge has imposed cost of Rs. 5,000/-. Having heard Mr. Wasi Ahmad Khan, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Purushottam Jha, learned counsel for the respondents, we are not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Judge as we are disposed to think once the disciplinary proceeding was initiated and punishment was imposed and the said facts were not mentioned, review was warranted. That apart, the order of punishment has gone unchallenged. Thus, order passed in review really cannot be found fault with. However, regard being had to totality of facts and circumstances cost imposed by the learned 3 Single Judge is made easy. It is needless to say if the cost has been deposited the same shall be refunded to the appellant. The appeal is accordingly disposed of. (Dipak Misra, C.J.) Abhay Kumar ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)