THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.9650 of 2010 Dated:27.04.2010 Between: Tekula Bhagyamma, And others. …Petitioners And Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, And others. ...Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.9650 of 2010 ORDER: The three petitioners are allegedly successors of Tekula Venkata Reddy. Their father was given a patta under 9(g) of Laoni Rules, 1950. It is their case that after the demise of their father they are in possession and enjoyment of the property. When there was a proposal to auction the land comprised in survey No.332 admeasuring Acs.3.00 allegedly belonging to the petitioners, they filed W.P.No.19605 of 2003 and obtained interim orders. The Writ Petition is still pending. In the meanwhile, the petitioners allege that construction is coming up on the land, which is taken up by the sixth respondent. Therefore, they gave a representation to the District Collector requesting to stop the illegal construction, in vain. Therefore, they filed the instant writ petition. This Court heard the Counsel for the petitioners. Even according to him, the interim order passed in W.P.M.P.No.24598 of 2003 in W.P.No.19605 of 2003 is still in force, and the said writ petition is still pending. Therefore, nothing prevents the petitioners to move another application in the pending writ petition if the District Collector failed to stop the construction. The Writ Petition is misconceived and unnecessary. Giving liberty to the petitioners to move appropriate application in the pending writ petition, this Writ Petition is dismissed. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 27.04.2010 vs