: 1 : SD IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.541 OF 2007 SECOND APPEAL NO.541 OF 2007 SECOND APPEAL NO.541 OF 2007 WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.257 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.257 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.257 OF 2007 Gram Panchayat, Arale, Sangli ...Appellant V/s. Vasant Dnyanu Pargaokar & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Anilkumar Patil, Advocate, for the Appellant. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATE : 29TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE : 29TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE : 29TH FEBRUARY, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate appearing for the appellant. Appellant is a Village Panchayat established under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The Village Panchayat filed a suit for declaration and injunction. The declaration was as regards illegality of a resolution passed by the Zilla Parishad. The Trial Court decreed the suit. The Appellate Court has interfered and has set aside the decree. 2. After having heard the learned Advocate appearing for the appellant, I find that no case is made out for interference. The Appellate Court has found that there was no evidence adduced by the appellant to show that the property subject matter of : 2 : the suit was vested in the appellant-Village Panchayat in accordance with provisions of law. Even assuming that the property in dispute is a property vesting in State Government, unless transfer of the said property by the State Government in favour of the appellant-Village Panchayat is shown, the appellant was not entitled to claim any relief. 3. No substantial question of law arises. Second Appeal is accordingly dismissed. 4. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, Civil Application No.257 of 2007 does not survive and the same is disposed of. [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] [ABHAY S. OKA, J.]