1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.453 OF 2002. Sou. Chhabhbai Uttam Rahinj ... Appellant. Versus Uttam S/o Mahadu Rahinj and others ... Respondents. ... Mr.S.P.Chapalgaonkar, advocate for the appellant. Mr.Vijay Sharma, advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1,3 to 7, 10, 11 and 12. Mrs.Y.M.Kshirsagar, A.P.P. for the Respondent No. 13. ... CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR,J. Date : 29.09.2009. PER COURT 1. Heard. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos.1,3 to 7, 10, 11 and 12 has placed on record an attested copy of compromise terms 2 (Rujuwatnama) dated 18.9.2006. It is marked as "X". The learned counsel Mr.Vijay Sharma makes a statement that the spouses have settled all their disputes. He further states that as per the terms of the compromise, the appellant agreed to withdraw the complaint for offence U/s 494 read with Section 109 of the I.P.Code. The learned counsel for the appellant (complainant) has placed on record copy of the letter sent by him to the appellant. He submits that he could not get any response. 3. There is no difficulty in accepting the statement of Mr.Vijay Sharma, learned advocate for the Respondent Nos.1,3 to 7, 10, 11 and 12 which is apparently supported by the terms of settlement placed on record (Exh."X"). 4. The appeal is preferred against the judgment of acquittal rendered in a private complaint case filed for offence U/s 494 read with Section 109 of the I.P.Code. In view of the settlement terms, it is not necessary to consider the appeal on merits and the impugned judgment of 3 acquittal need not be interfered with. 5. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel and the terms of settlement, the appeal is dismissed. (V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) asp/office/Crappeal45302