WPMS 1838/2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Sri S.K. Agarwal, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri R.C. Arya, Brief Holder for the respondents. Against the order dated 24.04.2010 passed by the Assistant Collector, a revision was filed before the Commissioner and an exparte order dated 14.05.2010 was passed staying the effect and operation of the order passed by the Assistant Collector dated 24.04.2010. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the said exparte order, has filed the present writ petition contending that the stay vacating application is not being decided and unnecessary adjournments are being obtained by the revisionist. Further, the revision itself was not maintainable against the order passed by the Assistant Collector. Be that as it may. This Court is not inclined to go into these questions at this stage and it would be open to the petitioner to raise all these objections before the revisional authority. Considering the facts and circumstances that has been record, I dispose of the writ petition directing the revisional authority to decide the stay vacating application on the date fixed, which, as the Court is informed, is 22nd November, 2010, after hearing all parties concerned. If for some reason, the stay vacating application is not heard on that date, the Commissioner will ensure that the same is heard and decided within ten days thereafter. The Court further directs that the revision itself would be decided within three months from the date of production of the certified copy of the order. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 26-10-2010 SP