1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. REVIEW PETITION NO.1 OF 2008 IN APPEAL (LODGING) NO.729 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2354 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.3221 OF 1984 Shri Kailashprasad Agarwal. ...Petitioner. Vs. Atul Dhirajlal Sohni & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. D.S. Chandanani i/b. M/s. Lexim Asso. for the Petitioner. Mr. Anuj Narula i/b. M/s.J. Narula & Asso. for Respondent No.2. ..... CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. February 29, 2008. P.C. : (PER DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.): Review has been sought of the judgment and order of this Court dated 29th September 2007. As far back as on 17th June 2000, certain directions were issued by the Hon'ble Shri Justice S.H. Kapadia (as His Lordship then was) on the report of the Court Receiver. Those directions have been adverted to in paragraph 2 of 2 our order dated 29th September 2007. In pursuance of the liberty which was granted to the Review Petitioner, he had moved the Small Causes Court, but failed both before the Trial Court and before the Appellate Bench of that Court. Once again on 10th June 2005, the Court Receiver was directed to comply with the order dated 17th June 2000 and that order was confirmed in appeal on 20th July 2005. A Special Leave Petition was also dismissed by the Supreme Court on 2nd September 2005. Review has been sought on the basis of an order dated 28th November 2007 passed by the Supreme Court. The proceedings before the Supreme Court arose out of an appeal before the Division Bench (Appeal 997 of 1997 in Notice of Motion 2957 of 1994 in Suit 4216 of 1994). The Supreme Court disposed of the Civil Appeal arising out of the judgment of the Division Bench with a direction that the suit shall be disposed of as early as practicable preferably by the end of June 2008. This direction of the Supreme Court does not affect any of the earlier orders which has held the field in the present proceedings particularly having regard to the fact that the earlier Special Leave Petition was dismissed on 2nd September 2005. No ground for review has been made out. The Review Petition 3 is accordingly dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE Dr.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.