1 W.P.No.512.11 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 512 OF 2011 Bharat Forge Ltd. ... Petitioner v/s Dhanaji Waman Shinde ... Respondent Mr.K.M.Naik i/by M/s.Haresh Mehta & Co. for the petitioner. Mr.M.S.Karnik for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 22ND FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C.: 1. The petition has been preferred to impugn the order passed by the Industrial Court on 26.7.2010 in Complaint (ULP) No.135 of 2010. By this interim order the Industrial Court has directed the respondent to comply with Clause 11 of the appointment order. The complaint has been filed for implementation of an award under which the respondent workman was granted reinstatement with continuity of service. The Industrial Court has observed in its order that respondent’s entitlement to the salary on par with similarly 2 W.P.No.512.11 situated employees can be decided only after evidence is led. Prima facie, it appears that by directing that Clause 11 of the appointment order should be implemented by paying the respondent salary at par with employees in his category, the Industrial Court has passed an inconsistent order. 2. In these circumstances, without going into the merits as to whether the respondent is entitled to any amount or a revision in his pay-scale on reinstatement, the impugned order is set aside and the Industrial Court is directed to decide the complaint within three months from today. 3. Writ petition disposed of accordingly. ..... 3 W.P.No.512.11