IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16668 of 2011 Wakil Chaudhary Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 24.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Originally, the informant filed complaint case on 15.10.2000 which was converted into Darauli P.S. Case no. 89/2009 under sections 364 and 120B of the IPC. Allegedly, petitioner, co-accused Malti Devi and Rama Shankar Sahni took the informant’s son to the house of accused Rama Shankar Sahni from where the son of the informant was found missing. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that co-accused Malti Devi is none else than wife of the victim. It is pointed out by him that, as a matter of fact, the victim was kidnapped by the informant and her other family member for which the accused Malti Devi lodged Darauli P.S. Case no. 11/2010 and much prior to the institution of the present case above stated co-accused Malti Devi had already given an informatory petition against in-laws including the informant of the present case. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Wakil Chaudhary, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in Darauli P.S. Case no. 89/2009. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)