1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 931 OF 2010 Digambar s/o Vyankatrao Kulkarni .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. Darshan Kulkarni, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Tambe, AGP for the State. Mr. R.V. Naiknavare, advocate for respondent no.2. ===== CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 24 th NOVEMBER, 2010 PER COURT : 1 The limited grievance of the petitioner who is the citizen of Parbhani city is that though he has a tap connection supplied by the Municipal Council, he is not getting adequate water supply. 2 In the reply filed on behalf of the respondent – Municipal Council, it is stated that the existing water supply scheme is sufficient only to cater with the needs of 140000 people which was population in the year 1986. It is 2 however, submitted that new water supply scheme under UIDSSMT is being executed while will be complete within a period of three years and which will be sufficient for catering to the needs of present population. It is submitted that after execution of the said scheme problems of the citizens would be solved. It is further stated that till that period the Municipal Council will try to provide water with equal pressure with existing infrastructure and existing lines. Statement made by the Municipal Council is taken on record and the petition is disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE ) ( B. R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb/office/wp931.10.odt