BBiCT®niE STATE iUM'BNISTRATIVE ISIBUSAL BEBCH RAIPOR (KP) . APPLICABT .. Shrjl Brijlal Sahu, age 60 y«ars, S/o Budharam Salm Head Hastec. Middle Scfeool, aaendrlban, RaWgaon, P.O.Tataaga, Tah. Bondl Lohara, BiStt. OURS. ~ WBFSUS RESPONDEKTS t 1. The Staf ®OVt.ofM.P. Through Ttee Seeretary Seheol JBtiucation Wallabfe Bhawan. BHOPAL. 2. P.iatrlct tdacatloin efficw, Btstr;lat-Byrg. 3. ftloek Baucation Offtcer, Bondl lotaara, O.lstt.Barg. APPLICATIOB B/S 19 OF THE AIB4INISTRATIVE TSIBUNAL ACT,l985 ;'i ) <a ^: 83 aa I^BIii ^'"s •f-:..',' -,;'cig.' i^'..'. i..1*«^l s?'''""""'*^ /?':... ^. -!i.. ./;7:" ,. vr^Ejr1 "' 'i^iEg^^ .-^A-l^:lL-~' '^^•y^ff'-"^. 1 o'%'<- 3IR?I^T k^antsi sBiiti ^n?g Tum 'Svl "iliqiciq, »Ti1^'ICS. facll'My 3JI^T TRR7 ;M^;f^,3,'z3o;^< 'mTOffwqra;"--'-----"'-"--^ '200 'I^^F' sn^i^TOre-af^ I +i^41^w<.ff?fe^^R3R STT^T SB : Hon'bte Shri Manindra Moyan Shrivastava, J. Shri Somkant Verma, coun^el forthe petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Payashi, Pan^l Lawyer for the State. With the consent of learnejd counsel for the parties, the petition is heard finally. By this petition, the petitior|er has ohallenged the order dated 23-06- 1999 (Annexure P-12), by which) in an enquiry, warning was issued and petitioner was deprived of sa^ry during which he remained under suspension. It has been statecf in the petition, against the aforesaid impugned order, appeal has beer) preferred but the same is pending. in this view of the matter,] it js directed that the appellate authority shall decided the appeal of the period of three months from the ^etitioner, if not already decided, within a date of receipt of a copy of this order. It would be open for the petitioner t|3 approach this Court, if his grievanoe still subsists. With the aforesaid directio^, the petition stands disposed of. Manindra^shrivastava Judge