IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4530 of 2010 ARUN MISTRY, SON OF RAM MISTRY Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.6450 of 2010 REKHA DEVI, WIFE OF ARUN MISTRY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18/02/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the First Information Report, the father of the deceased has alleged that his daughter has been done to death by her in-laws but there is no direct evidence against the present petitioners who are the elder brother-in-law and elder sister-in-law respectively of the deceased, who used to live separately. Under the circumstances, let the petitioners above named, whose case is similar to the co-accused, who has already been released on bail, be also released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Sirdala P.S. Case No. 29 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to 2 how he is related with the petitioners. (ii)That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)