/-s- y^Li ff. s /^ HIQH COURT OP CHHATTI8QARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPOHDENTS Writ PeUUon (Cl Mo.^l541^f20Q8 P.C. Shukla, S/o B. P. Shukla, aged about 73 years, 469 Priyadarshinin Nagr, Ring Road No.2, Raipur, TahsU and Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Municipal Corporation Through: its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur 2. 3. The Appeai" Committee, Municipal Corporation; Raipur Priyadarshini Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti Maryadit 445-B, Priyadarshinin N^ar, Raipur Through: its President Rajesh Shrivastava, Raipur (C.G.) ORAL ORDER 13.03.2008 DHIRBHDRA BUSHRA. J. Shri Goutam. Bhaduri, coimsel for fhe petitioner. Stur Bhisma Kinger, counsel for the respoudent No.3. Heard, The petitioner has ffled ttds petition uader Ardcle 226 of fhe Constitution of India for direction to fhe AppeKate Committee of fhe Municipal Corporation, Raipur to decide (he appeal preferred by flie respondent No.3, Society expcditiously aad it has been further prayed fhat the respondent No. l/ ComiiiMsioner be dfaBcted to impleiaent its order dated 9.7.2007 ofAnuexure P-3. Shri Bhishma Kiager, Advocate appearing on behalf of rcspondent No.3/ Pridarshini Grih Niraman Sahlcari Samiti, contended that fhe order of Annexure P-3 is already under chaUenge before fhe AppeBant Committee. Some ofher pcraons, who are affected under the order of Aimexure P-3, have also preferred appeal before tfae AppeBate Committee aad if fhe AppeUate Committee decides fhe appeal expeditiousty on merits, he has no objection. In view of the submission of leanaed counsel for fhe parties, fhe instant petition is disposed ofwifh a direction to fhe AppeUate Committee to decide the appeal No. 11/07 preferred by the respondent No.3 on merits expeditiousty prefeiabty within a pcriod of 4 monffas. Howcver, liberty is granted to fh.e petitioner to —A-_ approach ttus Court, ifcause ofaction stiU survwes.___ _ . ^. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge