IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2011 / 26TH JYAISHTA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 1258 of 2011() ---------------------------------- CC.168/2010 of CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED 1 & 3 ---------------------------------------------- 1. FR. ALIAS K.VARKEY, S/O.K.C.VARKEY, AGED 55 YEARS, PRIEST, KEERIMULAYIL HOUSE, PEECHI.P.O., PEECHI VILLAGE, THRISSUR-680653. 2. VIJI VARGHESE, S/O. VARGHESE, AGED 38 YEARS, KANICHAI HOUSE, P.O.PALAYAM PARAMBU, THRISSUR-680741. BY ADVS. SRI.V.B.HARI NARAYANAN SMT.RUBY P.PAULOSE RESPONDENT(S): STATE/COMPLAINANTS 1 & 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TRICHUR EAST STATION, TRICHUR. 3. PREETHESH, S/O. BALAKRISHNAN, MANGADANPARAMBATH HOUSE, MANALAYA.P.O., ANAMANGADU, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. PIN-679357. 4. SAJI KURIAKOSE, S/O. KURIAKOSE, KAVANAL HOUSE, PALANKODU DESAM, IKKARANADU NORTH VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. V. MANU THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.MC.No. 1258 of 2011() ANNEXURE ANNEXURE A1 : COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN C.C. NO. 168/2010 ANNEXURE A2 : COPY OF THE F1 STATEMENT OF 3RD RESPONDENT ANNEXURE A3 : COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN CRL.M.C. NO. 3603/2010 // TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE smt THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Crl.M.C. No.1258 of 2011 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 16th day of June 2011 O R D E R Petitioners are accused 1 and 3 in C.C.No.168 of 2010 of the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thrissur seeking to quash proceeding against them for offences punishable under Secs.406 and 420 r/w Sec.34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, “the IPC”). Learned counsel submitted that petitioners have settled all the claims except one. Learned counsel submits that petitioners are permitted to settle the claim of that person as well. But as of now, there is no settlement of that claim and no material is also produced before me to show the settlement. This Crl.M.C. is filed on 18.3.2011. There is no reason why I should keep this petition pending expecting a possible settlement between the parties. As and when there is a complete settlement parties concerned can move this Court Crl.M.C. No.1258 of 2011 -: 2 :- for appropriate reliefs. With the above observation, this Crl.M.C. is closed. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. Jvt