\ Q.-f^^'""...•••• / \.'.--1 y-'"' :•• ^,.^ aS^.l!..* ^•'-;. •-7 €^y^^ ^ y-^^7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.IS1 N0. ^l /2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^-\. 2. Shri Dhanmad Sai Dehari S/o Late Shri Megnath Dehari Aged about 50 years, Presently posted as S.H.O. Police Station Torwa Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur- (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) The DirectorGeneral of Police, Police Headquarter Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WMT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT_PETIT!QN (SLN0.780F 2011 PETITIONER Shri Dhanmad Sai Dehari RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Another (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Sunil Otwani, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAU (Passedonthis21stdayofJanuary, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been posted in the naxalite-infested areas for more than 12 years and because of his posting his brother-in-law was also killed by the naxalites. 3. Be that as it may, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in view of the provisions of Section 22 (2) (b) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007 {for short "the Act, 2007'), the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the Police Establishment Board (i'or short "the Board") pointing out the difficulties faced by the petitioner, if posted in Bijapur. 4. In view of the above, if a representation is made by the petitioner within a period of three days, the same may be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits, as earlyas possible preferably within a 'period of two weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. However, it is made clear that in the event, the petitioner has not been relieved from the present place of posting, he may hot be relieved till his representation is considered and decided bythe Board. Gowri ^s'...^0"* ^^ ^'