IN TME HON'BLE ^-(leH COURt OF CHHA'mSGARI-1 ^T BILASPUftfe.6.) W.P. t^t^.^^^^^^^^^^ <^^ PEnTIONERS ;,^eaaa,>^ AS.WjSs^i^ RESPONDENTS ^ ;1. Smt. Pu^hpa Sihgh, ageel dbout 42 yegrs, W/o Shpi Rdnjan Kumdr-; Lecturer, ©ovt. Aadarsh ©irls, 1-figheT Seconclary Sch&oJ, Baikuhthpur-, Distt. Kored (C.6.) y 2. Smt. Champa Srngh, dged dbout 47 year's,. W/o Shri Subhosfr Singh, Lecturer, i 6dv1'. (Sirls Higher .Secondary Schbol, Baiki.intKpui-, DiStl-. Korea (C.©;)1 ^3. Smt. Mamtd Paridey, aged about 43 years, W/6 Mur'li Pahdey,' 1-fead lirtasrer, ©over'ntn'eri't' PPimdry Schoo 1 ^ Ndvapdra, Patna; bisf)-. Kored (C.6.) VERSUS l.~.,;:;: Stateof .CKIiattiSgar'hl ^:,,.;,,.; ^j, :TRr^gh;-^ewet(ffi'^:'^'::'. .:^'|}.:^.,.^u Scho'ol Educdtion Department D.K.S. BhawQn,Rd(pur(C.6.) 2. Oistrict Edueation Officer Koria(<:.6.) 1 3. Th®bir'ecfor PubtiGlInstructton, ] :^htlia1'^ggF'h-©bver'nment" h;i.. jy^j :''.':;"::Raipur:(G:6.),..' !i -:',.; •.i.i;:.lw ^: ^Kj^ l?il K 9X3ESrW,:fX BI'i'BBIBtiB /<4. BfdGkEduccltion &epc(r'tffient Baikunthpur.DiSTt.KOFia (£.©.)' ^5. Joint Dipector, TredsuryAficount <& Pension Koria bistt. Koria (C.6.) WRITPEtItIONU/A 226/227 OFTHEiCONSTlTyTION OFINOIA 'F Sf^V SBI R-li* WT SV^V snira Wn'lTtbllc^ ^ST -*||q|<1A|, ®Tl|<-|<l(o,fafdiyy .:^.&.i3?.)... :...0^00 3n^T'CT?^T ('i^i^'i*!) TOiTwaftssn^i SB : HOH'BI-B MR. JUSTICB PlaTnUtBR DIWAKER 04.10.3010 Shri D.N.Ptajapati, coiin! Shri Vivck Sharma, P.L. .^el for ftte petitioners. ft>rfheState. drs actffance examfcua Counsel for fhe petition^rs are entttled to beiteflt oftwo fhey having passed B.Ed. at their own cost. It is subniitttd prcsent petition is no loager re^ fiiiaUy decided by the Hon'ble| Asha Saxeaa Vs. State of M.P. 59. It is furfher subxnittcd sinular view ia its ordcr dated 6257/2008. Counsel for fhe oider dated 29.4.2010 passed] wherein relyiag upon the judgii^ case ofAsha Saxena (supra) ia anofher Writ Appeal No. issued for consideratton of fhej incTeinents as per cireular of Madhya Pradesh, afler petition. judgii^ent antl dateti Counsel for the State iwmilrl nlsn he fnTlsidenri nn thri +Nif<41<li TW^i ^ ^s^ ^^K ^? sifim aiitn subnuts fhat thc petitioners iucreaiente on account of uation before fheir appoiatment fhat fhe issuc involved in the integra and the same faas been Supreine Court in thc case of '. & Ow. 2009 (III)MP^l (SC) tikat pelptioncrs verifldation fhis Court baa alao taken a 6.2.2009 passcd iu W.P.(S)No. further submits that the ia Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, ofthe Supreiuc Court in fhe the order passed by this Court 87/2009, directioHs have been case for grant of two advance 21.9.1974 issued by the State offtie facts pleaded ia fh,e sutolauts fhat casc offhe petitioners saine IJTIRS. IW^t' ^ •^ •" ^ ^ "ys/^. "•<C.,AHC—78 is,.s^s'' STI^T ^iT f<;-fi+ ^SH STT^T sh^ieh •'?<E ... ;s8;:y» ^ tlIHCIT »*1ie(» ;T=T "4i<iK-i<<, iSTily'is, fadi'ylj,< ....^&.M.S^.si^ Se sn^T'q^r (llcit-i»i<^i) ^tIIW ^fTO 311^1 In view of above, the direction to fhe respondent petitioaers for grant of two dated 21.9.1974 issued by .fe is£.^oj>nyo3 yqo3 ,. ,^erfficaJ&g^oyhe facts pleaded Ipetition is dteposed of wifli a aulhorities to decide the claha ofthe adtraace iacrements as pcr drcular th|s State of Madhya Pradesh after in the petition withia a penod of eight wigdks^pm today. ' ;-"^ iiSsistssaaiSe clear fhat opinion on inerits of fh.e cas -£,<? would"y'e at Uberty to decide wifh law. <^1^^41^ Hl^^ff ^ fe^ ?^l^i< ^sifinsn^r tt|is Court has not expresscd any ^ and the authority conceraed |the saine stricfly ia accordance Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge