IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2010 / 11TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 16878 of 2010(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHYNI.K., L.P.SCHOOL ASSISTANT, G.L.P.SCHOOL, MANHAPARA, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.AMARESAN SRI.G.KESU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KASARAGOD. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. ANITHA T.V., P.D.TEACHER, G.V.H.S.S., BELLIKOTH MPS, KASARAGOD. 4. HEADMISTRESS, H.S.S., KANHANGAD, KASARAGOD. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI. DILIP MOHAN, R1, R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (C) No. 16878 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is presently working an LPSA G.L.P.S Manhapara, Kasaragod. In the matter of the transfer of PD Teacher LPSA and UPSA, Ext.P2 provisional order has been issued by the first respondent. The petitioner was proposed to be transferred to Govt. High School, Kanhangad as per Ext.P2. Subsequently, another provisional transfer list as per Ext.P3 was issued by the first respondent. The original proposal made as per Ext.P2 has been proposed to be changed in Ext.P3. As per Ext.P3 the 3rd respondent has been proposed to be transferred to Govt.High School, Kanhangad. It is stated therein that the petitioner's case had been considered and accepted with priority. However, she was not given any posting. Feeling aggrieved by the said proposal made as per Ext.P3 the petitioner has preferred Ext.P4 representation before the first respondent. The petitioner claims that he is entitled to have some preferential treatment in the matter of transfer and at the same time contends that the 3rd respondent WPC.16878/2010 : 2 : have no such preferential claim. Such claims and objections are raised in Ext.P4 representation before the first respondent. Ext.P4 is still pending before the first respondent. Considering the fact that against Ext.P3, the petitioner has already preferred Ext.P4 before the first respondent and it is pending before the first respondent, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 with notice to the petitioner and also to the 3rd respondent, expeditiously, at any rate, within three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. Even in case Ext.P3 has been finalised that shall not stand in the way of such consideration. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma