1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (CONTEMPT JURISDICTION) MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2010 THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.731 OF 2010 ************ B.Abdul Khader, Secretary, Mazjid E Nooriya (Reg.No.404/98) No.16-31 Street,G.K.M.Colony,Chennai-600 082 .. Petitioner vs. Rajesh Lakoni, IAS., The Commissioner The Corporation of Chennai Chennai – 600 003 ..Respondent Contempt Petition praying that this Court be pleased to punish the respondent for wilful disobeying the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 06/01/2010 and made in W.P.No.26792 of 2010. The above Contempt Petition coming on this day before this Court for hearing in the presence of Mr.I.V.S.Manian, Advocate for the petitioner herein; and upon reading the petition and affidavit of B.Abdul Khader, filed herein; the Court made the following order:- This contempt petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court, on 6.1.2010, in W.P.No.26792 of 2009. 2.Paragraph 4 of the order passed by this Court, on 6.1.2010, in W.P.No.26792 of 2009, reads as follows: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 "4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the first respondent, within ten days from today and on receipt of such representation, the first respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, after obtaining an inspection report from the second respondent and after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the other parties concerned, as expeditiously, as possible not later than twelve weeks, thereafter." 3. Even though this Court had directed the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent within ten days from the date of the order, the petitioner had made a representation, only on 24.2.2010, as admitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had not been in a position to state as to when the representation, dated 24.2.2010, had been received by the respondent. Further, it had not been shown as to how the respondent had wilfully disobeyed the order of this Court, dated 6.1.2010, made in W.P.No.26792 of 2009. In such circumstances, this Court does not find sufficient cause or reason to entertain the contempt petition. Hence, it stands dismissed. No costs. Witness the Hon'ble Thiru M.YUSUF EQBAL, The Chief Justice of High Court at Madras, as aforesaid, this the 28th day of June, 2010. SD/- DEPUTY REGISTRAR (OS) //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2011. COURT OFFICER (O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the orders/judgments/Decrees in this format. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3 Cns. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.731/2010 THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN ORDER DATED : 28/06/2010 FOR APPROVAL :14/12/2010 APPROVED ON :15/12/2010 Copy to: Shri Rajesh Lakoni The Commissioner The Corporation of Chennai Chennai – 600 003 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/