IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 19TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 2150 of 2011(P) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. P.O.THOMAS, S/O.OUSEPH, PANAYAKKUNNEL HOUSE, B.L.RAMKARA, CHINNAKANAL VILLAGE, UDUMPANCHOLA TALUK. 2. MARYKUTTY W/O P.O.THOMAS, PANAYAKKUNNEL HOUSE, B.L.RAM KARA, CHINNKKANAL VILLAGE, UDUMPANCHOLA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONERATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, PAINAVU, IDUKKI-685 603. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DEVIKULAM-685 613. 4. THE THASILDAR, UDUMPANCHOLA, PIN 685 554. 5. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHINNAKKANAL-685 618. 6. THE SPECIAL THAHSILDAR (LAND ASSIGNMENT) RAJAKUMARI-685 619. R1 TO R6 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P. NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.2150 OF 2011(P) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T Complaining that during the pendency of Exts.P11 and P12 revisions, attempt is being made to dispossess the petitioners from the land in their possession that the writ petition has been filed. 2. Learned Government Pleader has obtained instructions in the matter. According to the Government Pleader, revisions filed were not signed and were not affixed with proper court fee. The revisions were also not accompanied by the order impugned. It is stated that therefore revisions were returned to the parties concerned. If that be so, there is no question of this court directing disposal of Exts.P11 and P12. In that view of the matter, leaving it open to the petitioner to move proper revision petitions, the writ petition is closed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/