CLCON No.206 of 2005 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri C.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant/Contempt Petitioner and Sri Parikshit Saini, Adv. for the respondents. This Court on 12.05.2005 directed the Chairman, Nagar Palika, Roorkee, district Haridwar to consider the feasibility of employing the petitioner as has been done in the case of other similarly circumstanced employees. Since the order was not complied with by the Chairman, hence the present Contempt Petition was filed by the applicant. Now the writ petition has finally been disposed of on 16.09.2005 and the Jal Sansthan has been directed to comply the order passed by this Court. In fact, the respondents, in the Contempt Petition, have no jurisdiction to comply the orders passed by this Court because the petitioner is not the employee of the respondent no. 1 & 2 in the Contempt Petition. The Contempt Petition is misconceived and is dismissed as such. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) 30.11.2005: NCM: