IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1345 of 2010 In (CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE 4095/2009) Sunil Kumar Singh, Son of Sri Ram Parikshan Singh, Resident of village Mabbi,P.S.Sadar Mabbi,O.P.District-Darbhanga……… Appellant/Respondent no.9. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through District Magistrate, Darbhanga 2. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga. 3. The District Supply Officer, Darbhanga. 4. The Sub-divisional Officer, Sadar, Darbhnaga. 5. Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Ltd. Sone Bhawan,5th floor, Birchand Patel Path, Patna. 6.The Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Ltd .Sone Bhawan,5th floor, Birchand Patel Path, Patna. 7. The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Ltd, Darbhanga. 8. Chairman-cum-District Magistrate, District Transport Committee, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Ltd., Darbhanga. ….Respondent/Respondents. 9.Sanjeev Kumar Singh ,son of Sri Rameshwar Prasad Singh, Resident of Sihma,P.S.Matihani, District- Begusarai. …. Respondent/petitioner ---------------------------------- 3 23.08.2011 The present Letters Patent Appeal under clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the High Court of Judicature at Patna has been filed against the order dated 14.7.2010 passed in CWJC No. 4095of 2009(Sanjeev Kumar Singh Vrs. State of Bihar) along with its analogous case CWJC No. 17825 of 2009 by the same petition. CWJC No. 4095/2009 had been filed for quashing of the order dated 12.2.2009 issued by the Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Ltd. by which the name of the petitioner has been kept out of the reserved panel of transporting and handling agent for Darbhanga District in the year 2007-08 on the ground that he has been suspended from transportation work in the District of Madhubani in the year 2 2007-08 for being irresponsible in his work. Subsequently, CWJC No. 17825 of 2009 was also filed by the same petitioner for quashing the order dated 07.10.2009 passed by the Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation, by which the petitioner’s review application has been rejected and the order of blacklisting passed earlier on 31.3.2009 has been maintained and there was a further direction that in future also no work shall be taken from him in the matter of transportation in any district by the Corporation. It is pertinent to state here that the present appellant was respondent no.9 in CWJC No, 4095/09. Initially the appellant had entered appearance in the said CWJC No.4095/2009 but later on when the matter was finally heard, he was not represented before the learned Single Judge, since none appeared on his behalf . After hearing the parties, the learned Single Judge vide order under Appeal had set aside the order by which the writ petitioner has been black listed and debarred from allotment of work in future. It was also observed that since the blacklisting had been set aside, the petitioner being above the Private Respondent (present appellant) in the reserved panel, the writ petitioner would be given preference. The writ petition thus came to be allowed. After going through the reasons mentioned in the order under Appeal and perusing the materials on record, we are satisfied that the said order does not suffer from any infirmity and we are in agreement with the same. 3 For the reasons aforesaid, this Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed. Sudha/Anand (S.K.Katriar,J) ( Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)