-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 1293 O 2004 Sarjerao Dnyanu Ramoshi (Chavan) ..Appellants. since deceased through his legal heirs 1A. Smt. Malan Sarjerao Chavan & Ors. Versus Shivaji Shankar Patil & Ors. ..Respondents. --- Mr. V.Talkute & V. M. Mali for the Appellants. ----- CORAM : S. R. SATHE, J . CORAM : S. R. SATHE, J . CORAM : S. R. SATHE, J . DATED : 13TH JANUARY, 2006. DATED : 13TH JANUARY, 2006. DATED : 13TH JANUARY, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard, the learned Advocate for the Appellants. . From the perusal of the judgment of both the courts below, it is very clear that both the courts below, after considering the entire evidence, have given a finding of fact that on the date of the suit, the plaintiff was in possession of the property and as such injunction has been issued against the defendants. So, there is, in fact, no question of law involved in the present matter much less the substantial question of Law. Hence, the appeal is dismissed in limine. 13.01.2006 (S.R.SATHE,J.) -: 2 :- .....