IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-3089 of 2010 Date of Decision: February 02, 2010 Priyanka Sukhija & Another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Sandeep Jasuja, Advocate, for the petitioners. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) It transpires that as per allegations, the petitioners got married in Vidyadhar Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). Petitioner No.2 approached the High Court of judicature in Rajasthan by way of filing a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner No.1 appeared before that Court and gave a statement that she wants to live with her parents. Considering the issue in that context, the Habeas Corpus petition was dismissed. It has now been projected before this Court that petitioner No.1 wants to live Crl. Misc. No. M-3089 of 2010 [2] with the husband under changed circumstances. I also find that a civil suit has been filed by petitioner No.2 before the Civil Judge at Sri Ganga Nagar (Rajasthan). Petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for restitution of conjugal rights has also been filed by petitioner No.2 before the District Judge, Sri Ganga Nagar (Rajasthan). Considering the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate for the petitioners to approach the Courts in Rajasthan. The petition is disposed of. (AJAI LAMBA) February 02, 2010 JUDGE avin