*>,- . c^^^ ^^%-^, ^.-^' !. ^^^- ./'- ,;!SN'..'•' ^^v^-"' ^^^^1 s^i^ VK'!3S ^•l':.s^"...1 <y't <••' ^ IN THE HKSH GOIXlBT QF JUDlGATURS AT BILASFDRSiRste CHHAT'nSGAB W.P.BO. /2003 PETITIONER V,K. Shrivastava, Aged about 58 years, S/6. Jageshwar Prasad R/o. PuTani Basti, Raipur,Distt.Raipur(C.G.)- iEESPONDBirra ^ '^^ . \!^ ^ <€^^..^' •^y.^-' - ^y :'.,':^^^l-'-^::i.:.^ '•.l'^^^.r':j-t: .:i? 1] StateofChhattisgarh, Through: Secretaiy, Education Deptt, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 21 District Efiucauon Qfficer, Raipiu- Perision Bada, Raiptir Dislrict ^ Raipurje.G.) 3] Direetor pf Public Instruction Pension Bada, Raipur, Distiict-3?Eupur (C.G.I 1wi:^E:PES1BB^Sf9l{B]SSSSSSSSSsSc:S26f32'7'iaF"Eim •^s^cews'iVEfSssw'aKwiaA.''^ ,-' '. »-w\ XI-HC-22 .. -an^t^ IS'iwanSOT. WWf> ^^ ©. IK s i'3'ef ^TORTq^'gT^'EFre.'INTOgt :,^,%.,^:.,,'w^'.^1.^^4^o^ Tnvfft'yRwsK"'"'""""""'""""'""""'^^ 200 •, 4-14006 - Shli Manoj Paraajape»Counsel|for^:iepetitioner. Shri S^tisliOitpta, Dy. Govfc.J^. finrthe State. WithccBiseiitlieat^finally.~I..A^ 2. The' petitioner has filed tius •s •••• eonstituyo&ofIndiaSeekiingadirectiQn timeboundpromotiontothepetitioneij; .t9$7 3. Counsel forffie petitioner subi^iits AssistantTeaeheron 20-7-1968 arid He •subinits that the petitioner has t)ee(i given-the secend time bourid promoti^n. is entitled^Eor the secondftiitifi bound| Circular Aanexure P-1 dated 23-8-] shouldbepfomoterftottiepostafHs^ ofRs. 1400-2040 andtfhettascbtBpl^t promoted to the pay scale ofRs. 164< promotion cotnmittee. Helurfher Subi^its 19-9-1990, hewasgivenfirsttimebo^nd per Annexure T-3 dated 17-4-1999, it| employees who havp eampleted 12 promoted tp the highec postsuhject tUat thereaft&- as per Almexure p-# . ^Bfi'l'')l't 119<ri)"S:f?T3t <Rit(l< -. •'^' ^aif^art^r ~ '. No. 10964/2005 is aUowed. petitionumterArticte 226327 of the^ fo'the respondent feir giving second M^iits'fhat tfie petitioner was appoiHted as |iSiserving smce last more Ihan 37 yeai^ ^venfestlime hound but has not been i^. He fiirthersubnutsthat;thepetitk)^ 1 promotion. He also submits that as per '$7, if was direeted that Assistant Teachers Master pfPrimarySehoolonpay scale l^ted t2yeaftQntluspayseale,thenliebe .40-2900 if fbund fit by;the departmental that as per order Annexure P-2 dated promotiQB. IIe iurthersubmitsthatas |was decided bythe Oovemment Ifaat the 5teais or more.on the same post, can be certairi condifions. He fiuther subniits dated 2-5-2002, theGovmanent of ft> :[Tft^ ^f^t .XI-HG-22 ^? •3ffin?m, E?Ti1+i'i!i; i«i<-ii'HlS Hpieti wtira)ttz -f -f^e.^rs^ l.ws^ •-•"•'•""••"•"•"-"••"•""^t-:206' 200 ,R«x^ii" sn^i'?;i\, ~ .feqJeB' 311^1 :?tiU ^%^ •S3 3I1^T T^IIW f<K9 ^—T' Cllhattisgarii also adopfed fhe earli< Cotmset ibr the petitioriw subnlite petitioner iseatitled for second time decision ofthis Court passediaW.P jr <M-ders fegafdmg time t)ound pnMnotion. |tt% ^ordmg to the abpve'xaiu.te tboundpromotiQn. Heplacefltcliaac&ona No. 4787/2064MP. Dubevandotfiere -• v- State of Chhattisgarli and othafe) dated 23-9-2005.- He alsp relied on a decision ofthe Hoh'ble ^exCourt -v- K.K. Roy repoi-ted in 2004 AIR releyantand quQtedMow:- linthe ease ofState ofTripura and ofhas - -/ • ISCW^l. Para 6 aad 7 bfthe decisionai-e :HI!- ff^ "6. Itisnotacase'wKere It is alsonota case where th^t fAe prqmotional policy. Ih{ meaning ofArtieU ef-12 af\ proMotional avenues fw^ constitutionql obligations Constitu.tionofIndia.Despit^. cannot take a standthatas tUe -andcanditfons 'ofthe qffer therevasno.avenue ofprdr^otion, ' not a case where:the.pnnc{ appliedhaving'regard-to (Aej i is nat^isputedthatthesthe^ States regard to the recommenda^ Commissionintrfiducedthe tenns •wherec^'the incumbe^ ••periodofl2 yearsis grant^ upon completiQn bf 24 yedr^ promoted despite extsten^e questioned, the leamed c\ appellant, even'could not introducedsucha scheme. W m chfAl[<'iA(1l ^TSR^f'^ .^^.1 <f<i^i^ . - •^aipgiTsn^r. •- ;: yiereexistedanayemteforprpmotion. Statemtendedtomdkectmendmentsm ? appellant^being a State'within the \t1te Constitu.tidn should Kave ereated respQndent having regcif'd to tts a^itmbratedwArticles 14 an3 f6afthe [jlscxmstitutionalobBgatifyns.the Sfate respondent hereinaccepte^the terms yappamtment hwwtng fullyweS..t)ictt otifetion, he.cannotresstetherefrom.Itis ^ples ofestoppel or 'waiver sHtwld be 1 canstituttmiatftmctionsoftheStdte. It inIniSci, Ufnonaflnfliahaying ions .mQde- in.this'belwy by the Pay \:hemeofA,ssuredCareerPriom6tionm it of a post tfIwt promoted 'within a one higher seale ofpcty'ancianother ifinihe meanwhile he had not been • vf, promotioncfl avemtes.^When ^Uffsel appearing ion behalf of the <W thatthe State ofTnpurci-'has [ewonclerastowfiysuchasehenie'was fipint E'Hi^^Ra? -R XI-HC-22 "3^ '^HRPf, •s€tHfl?,fa<tiy'l< sn^r^i '^IRTSnJR'I ?hHl<ft ^~. %-, ^f wwtrai*ii<*^^iy^.t^sb^o'oi~ "Wl. 200 •fa^r' .not mtroducsd'by the App^lant-, what impetted it fram'^ servioe 'wid havmg^regard pomtedoutby this Cmcrtm vasexpected that_the Ap^ellant st^ld hay^ 7?.^ncipM , ; \ •' -^ 7. - ; We are, thus./cfthet least.entitledtogranf'dffwt period ofl2 yewsfrmnthe otherupon.expiry of2fyea ^pinionthat ther'espondentheremiscit bigher grades, onewponexpiryefthe ^ateofhfsjainmg oftheserviceamlthe ^sthereof. . ; ,• • • • ;':',; • ' -;: . ' ; ' ,;'' 4, Having heard and cotisider^d and material on record, and sihce yeairs of regylar service, and has] petition is allowed and the coacented consider the case of the petitioner timeboundpTQmetion. Certified copy as perrules. +wfd''fl-)~t|lwT^1S'3t.<&*{i< ^ aipgq Sifet . lilcetheotherStatesinlridia.and so. PromotKm being a condttiqn of Qtherequirementsthereofas has been 1iedecisicinare/erredtohereinbeft)re,it' the facts and circu»nstanceS of the case |tfee petitioaer has completed mor©than 24 got only one -titri®tound promotioH^ tl» Distriet Educatiotl QfiBcg'jW^K^is^lo •••''--:-;-—L—- fn Accordance witfi law &r grant <rf'sec(»tdL Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [1f^ ^fo^ ^IM^ ^ /^