IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21693 of 2007 SAJID RAZA @ BABLOO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 7 3.5.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner prays for quashing the order dated 24.4.2007 passed by the 9th Addl. Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in S.T.No.182 of 2006 whereby he rejected the petition dated 3.2.2007 filed on behalf of the petitioner under section 227 of the Cr.P.C. for discharging him from the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no material has come against the petitioner either in his confessional statement or the confessional statement of co-accused. The petitioner has relied upon a case reported in 1960 SC 866 as well as case of Bhajan Lal Vs State of Haryana, reported in 1992 SC 604. Learned State counsel submits that the cognizance of offence against the petitioner and others has been taken under sections 302, 364A, 201 and 120B of the Penal Code. It would appear from the order of the Sessions Judge that there is sufficient material for framing charge against the petitioner. He further submits that all the points raised by the petitioner may be looked into at the time of trial of the case. It would appear from the order of the Sessions Judge that the petitioner in his confessional statement has accepted his guilt. Further more, the name of the petitioner has figured in the 2 KHAN confessional statement of other co-accused. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order dated 24.4.2007 rejecting the application for discharge. This application is accordingly dismissed. (S.P.Singh,J)