THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO :1705 of 2010 DATED: 02-02-2010 Between: B.R.Prasad Vattiprolu. ..... PETITIONER And Dr.N.T.R.University of Health Sciences, Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Registrar, Vijayawada & another. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: Petitioner is a student of Physiotherapy (BPT) and in the month of October, 2009, he appeared for eighth semester examination vide Hall Ticket No.0429006. He states that right from the first semester, he was securing more than 60% of marks but to his surprise, in the eighth semester examination he was awarded only ‘34’ marks in ‘Clinical Cardiology’. In the light of the same, he gave an application to the respondents for re-totalling the marks and his request was accepted and on retotalling the marks, he secured ‘35’ marks. Even this, according to the petitioner, is not correct. According to him, he is a bright student and he would get not less than 60% under any circumstances and hence he approached this Court and filed the present Writ Petition, requesting to direct the respondents to send the answer script of ‘Clinical Cardiology’ to any other expert for the purpose of revaluation. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for N.T.R.University appearing for the 1st respondent. None appeared for the 2nd respondent. 3. In a number of cases, this Court as well as the Hon’ble Supreme Court has taken the view that the question of revaluation does not arise in the absence of any statutory power. In fact, pursuant to the directions given by this Court as well as the apex Court, the 1st respondent-Dr.N.T.R.University of Health Sciences framed certain guidelines and pursuant thereto a Grievance Redressal Committee was constituted and the persons like the petitioner, who have any grievance with regard to marks that have been awarded, can approach the said Committee and make a representation, where a subject expert also will be a member. If the said Committee is satisfied, the said answer script of the persons like the petitioner will be referred to another expert for the purpose of revaluation. In this view of the matter, this Court directs the petitioner to approach the said Grievance Redressal Committee, constituted by the 1st respondent, and give a representation about his grievance within a period of four weeks from today and as and when such a representation is given, the said Committee shall decide the same within a period of two weeks thereafter and pass necessary orders. 4. Accordingly, Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ T.GOPALAKRISHNA,J 02nd February, 2010. Tsy