IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.3976/2008 Decided on:18.7.2010 _____________________________________________ Nirmala Kumari. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Virender Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. Advocate General. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioner is that she has passed B.T.C. two years course from Union Teachers Training Course, Rajpura Town (Punjab), and the respondents are not considering her candidature for the appointment of J.B.T. Teacher. Similarly, situate persons had approached the learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal assailing their termination orders. Their main contention was that no notice was issued to them before terminating their services. The learned Tribunal quashed the termination orders. The State Government went in appeal before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The Hon’ble Supreme Court directed the State to hold an inquiry whether 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 the certificates issued by the Union Teacher’s Training Centre, Rajpur Town were fake or not. The inquiry was conducted by the State Government and it was found that the Union Teacher’s Training Centre, Rajpur Town was not recognised and the certificates issued by it were found to be fake. The petitioner has also obtained the certificate from Union Teacher’s Training Centre, Rajpura Town. The certificate obtained by the petitioner is not genuine. Since the inquiry has already been conducted on the basis of the orders passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court by the State Government, petitioner could not seek employment on the basis of certificate which was not duly recognised. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 18.7.2010 *awasthi*