IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI ANDTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 653 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 13/06/2008 in WP NO : 11157 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 Kranthi Jyothi Sanitation Workers welfare Society, Regd No. 212/05, rep. by its President Yandrapati Jaya Rao S/o. Neelambaram R/o. D.No. 16-33-46, Balaji Nagar, Old Guntur. 2 Nagara Safayi Karmachar's Sankshe Sangam, Regd. No. 242/05, Rep. by its President Shiram Shetty Venkat Rao, S/o. Satyam, R/o. D.No. 18-2-2, Syedkhan Street, China Bazar, Guntur. 3 Krupa Municipal Private Sanitary Workers Welfare Society, Regd. No. 694/05, Guntur, Rep. by its Secretary Nageswari W/o. Samuel , R/o. D.No. 8-14-76, Venkatadri pet, Guntur. 4 Keerthana SC-ST PArisudya Karmika Sankshema Sangam Regd. No. 705/05, Guntur, rep.by its President K.Yesamma W/o. Samuel, R/o. D.No. 8-14-77, Venkatadripet, Guntur. ..... APPELLANTS AND 1 State of A.P., Rep. by its Principle Secretary Municipal Administration & UrbanDevelopment ( G-II ), Secretariat Building, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner and Director of Minisipal Administration, Hyderabad 3 The Guntur Minicipal Corporation at Guntur, Rep. by its Commissioner. 4 Siddarthe Jain, IAS, S/o. Rakesh Fouzer Commissioner Municipal Corporation Guntur, Guntur. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.K.ASHOK REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari ) Aggrieved by the order, dated 13.06.2008 made in WP No.11157 of 2008 dismissing the writ petition seeking to assail the tender notice dated 28.4.2008 issued by the third respondent herein, the writ petitioner preferred this Appeal. When this appeal is taken up for admission, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the tender period has already expired and, therefore, the cause does not survive for adjudication. Recording the same, the Writ Appeal is dismissed having become infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari _________________________ Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy February 4, 2009 MAS