1 Anando IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2156 OF 2009 Ranjit Malhotra ..Petitioner V/s. Life Insurance Corporation ..Respondents of India & anr. Mr.K.K.Singhvi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Jimmy Awasia, Mr.Chirag Mody & Mr.Bhushan Pande i/b.DSK LEGAL, Advocate, for the Petitioner Mr.Firoz Bharucha i/b.Raymond V. Samuel, Advocate, for the Respondents CORAM : J. N. PATEL & C. L. PANGARKAR, JJ. DATE : 4TH MARCH, 2010 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the notice issued by the Respondents, terminating the tenancy of the Petitioner. The Petitioner claims to be a tenant of the Respondents. It is the 2 contention of the Petitioner that originally his mother was a tenant and subsequently, he has been accepted as tenant by the Respondents. The Petitioner contends that the conditions as stated in the letter dated 23rd June, 1982, have been accepted by the Respondents and one of the conditions is that the Petitioner shall not be evicted by the Respondents on the ground of bona fide requirement. The Petitioner, therefore, challenges the said notice. 3. The Petitioner s tenancy has already been terminated by the said notice. If, at all, the Petitioner has any grievance then the eviction under Section 13 of the Bombay Rents, Hotel And Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as Rent Act ) can be opposed. The Petitioner has a right to point out the above contentions before the Estate Officer. Therefore, there is no reason to interfere in the matter. Interim Order 3 stands vacated. The Petitioner wanted to file re-joinder. Prayer is rejected. 4. Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of. (J. N. PATEL, J.) (C. L. PANGARKAR, J.)