IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmseARH AT BILAsPua WRIT PETITION (s) No. W} OF 2009 A / SmT. Meena KharyW/O Iafe V.Kkhure, aged abouT 45 years, R/O M.I.G. 53, Dr. Rajendra Pmsad Nagar, Korba, DisTricT- Kor'ba, (C.G.) o ‘ Touh‘ “T‘ Accounmn’r General,'ChhaHisgarh, Raipur, (C.6.) Prescribed Officer (Pension), Office of Joint DirecTor, Treasury and Accounts and Pension, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, (6.6.) Deputy Direcfor/ Pension Officer, Office of Joint Director, Treasury and Accounts and Pension, Bilaspur ‘ Division, Bilaspur, (C.6.) Assistanf Soil Conservator Officer (NW5) Kafghora, District— Korba, (C.G.) RESPONDENTS :1. 7 Q / WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSITITU'IION OF INDIA ta I (“’fv‘a’ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETlTlON (S) No. 4937 of 2009 PETITIONER : Smt. Meena Khar VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Accountant General, Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Aqnihotri, J. > Present: Ms. Indira Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioner. . ‘ Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyerfor the State. Shri Anand Verma Standing Counsel for the Respondent No.1. . . ‘ ORDER (ORALI’ (Passed on 28‘ day of April, 2010) This case pertains to grievance of non—grant of retiral dues. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the matter may be referred to the Pension Committee. 2. This Court, in W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal ’Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee”to consider the matter of retriai dues as the disputed question of facts were invoived. ‘The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19-06—2006 passed in W.P.No.1961l2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), and orderdated 13-3—2008 passed in M.C.C. /. . I No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarhand others vs. Baijnath Mandai and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 315‘ January, 2008 passed in W.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandai (supra) as submitted by learned. counsel appearing for the enaa;w—.f» parties. ' 3 This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e., the office of the AdvocateGeneral is directed to send the case to the Committee, I within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. i??? \ \ Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the'petitioner and officers \\ \\\ \ \\ \ \ rx _ \ concerned within a further 'period of 15 days. The Committee shali consider and pass order, in accordance with law and in view of the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Syed Abdul Qadir and others v. State of Bihar and others’, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner, be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall supply one complete set of the petition to the State counsel as well as counsel for the respondent No.1 for transferring the same to the Committee. ’ sm- Gowri ~ v .l‘swsh K. Agnihotri Judge \ 1 (2009) 3 SCC 475 A‘J‘ ‘