\ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRIMINAL APPEAL N0. ll^ of2011 CRIIVIINAL APPEAJ- UNDER SECTION 374(2) OF JTHE CODE OF CRIIWINAL PROCEDURE APPELLANTS (In Jail) "-•"^^ RESPONDENT 1. Punaram Yadav S/o Kuhukram Yadav, aged about 24 years, 2. Chondha @ Sunil, S/o Manglu Yadav, aged about 20 years, Both residents of Village Chana Dongri, Police Station Takhatpur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh, through Station House Officer, Police Station Takhatpur District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ^ S.^g^^^ ^. ^ssy'-y^ . ^ss^^ XI-HC-22 •V- sn^i^r R-ti.'* SRI^?I ^f^ ^F?CT '3-er -i||<)ld'4, ^Tfl'y'lti. Fsidl'My 3'n^r •q?ra? ^-^•'•^"^'^ .00 •fitRfrsiiwqi fq^sr" an^i'gwiwtfe SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTI Shri R. S. Marhas, coijinsel Shri Pravin Oas, Dy'. fil^d Counsel for the appellants have already 2008 and therefore he this appea). He is permitted to do| Accordingty, the and the appellants woul^ memo in Crimlnal Appeal a^petlants submits that the Criminal Appeal No. 921 of be permitted to withdraw mpy so. app^at ^Mh^ TITCff^fs^ if^K ^'ariigqsn^T :E PRITINKER DIWAKES for the appeltants, .A. for the State. No is dismissed as wlthdrawn be at liberty to fite their .921 of 2008. Sd!- fret Y)^a^ ?^^^ ['Tft^'^f^f