... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.2051 OF 2006 FIRST APPEAL NO.2051 OF 2006 FIRST APPEAL NO.2051 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Umesh Mankapure for the Appellants. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 06, 2007. DATE : FEBRUARY 06, 2007. DATE : FEBRUARY 06, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. In view of decision of this court in the case of Vitthal Ramchandra Mali Vs. Laxmi Ganapati Mali (2006(4) ALL MR Page 389), this Appeal is maintainable in the District Court as the same arises out of an Application for grant of succession certificate under section 370 of the Indian Succession Act. 2. The Advocate for the Appellants has stated that there is no possibility of settlement. Hence, Appeal be returned to the Advocate for the Appellants for presentation to appropriate District Court. Alongwith Appeal, all its accompaniments and Civil Application shall be returned. ... 2 ... Ad-interm order of status-quo passed on 26th August, 2006 will continue to operate for a period of twelve weeks from today to enable the Appellants to take appropriate steps. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE