THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.4779 OF 2010 March 15, 2010 Between: Chilla Nagaratnam, W/o.Late Chilla Satyavanthudu ... Petitioner And The District Collector, East Godavari District at Kakinada And another ... Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.4779 of 2010 ORDER: The land admeasuring Acs.0.51 in survey No.215/1B was assigned to petitioner’s husband. The petitioner alleges that second respondent resumed the land under Section 4 of the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 (the Act), without issuing notice. Petitioner therefore applied for records and obtained certified copies of necessary orders and requested second respondent not to resume the land, in vain. Therefore, she filed the instant writ petition seeking writ of Mandamus declaring the action of second respondent in resuming the land as illegal and arbitrary. This matter initially came up on 30.3.2010. As a submission was made that the land was already resumed under the provisions of the Act, this Court directed the Assistant Government Pleader to produce the file. The original file from the office of second respondent is placed before this Court. A perusal of the same would reveal that on 10.10.2007, petitioner’s husband and transferee, namely, Namati Satyanarayana, were issued notice under the relevant Rules on allegation that petitioner’s husband sold the land under an agreement of sale. No explanation was submitted and the second respondent issued proceedings bearing No.(B)/63/2007, dated 29.12.2007, resuming the land for contravention of the provisions of the Act. In pursuance thereof, the Additional Revenue Inspector and Village Revenue Officer took possession of the land on 03.1.2008 under a cover of panchanama. In view of the facts revealed by perusal of the record, the only remedy available to petitioner is to approach the second respondent to obtain copy of the order passed by the second respondent. In this writ petition, no relief can be granted. The writ petition is therefore dismissed. No costs. ______________ March 15, 2010 (V.V.S. RAO, J) YS