In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. *** CR No.945 of 2010 (O&M) Decided on 15.3.2011. M/s Khanna Jewellers (M/s Khanna Company) --Petitioner vs. Kamal Kishore Handa --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. V.K.Sandhir,Advocate, for the petitioner Mr.Vaneet Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent Rakesh Kumar Jain, J, (Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order of learned Rent Controller, Amritsar, dated 18.12.2009, by which provisional rent has been assessed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no reason is assigned in the impugned order in assessing the provisional rent. This fact is admitted by the learned counsel for the respondent. In this view of the matter, this revision petition is allowed. The impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back with a direction to the learned Rent Controller, to decide the application afresh by giving cogent reasons. The parties are directed to appear before the learned Rent Controller,Amritsar on 30.3.2011. 15.03.2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge