[1] IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1628 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 1628 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 1628 OF 2006 Smt. Sunita @ Sushmita Ajit Ghosalkar .. Applicant vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. Swapnil Wagh, Advocate a/w Mr. S.A. Khan for the applicant. Mrs. M.H. Mhatre, APP for Respondent CORAM CORAM CORAM : K.J. ROHEE, J. : K.J. ROHEE, J. : K.J. ROHEE, J. DATE DATE DATE : 12TH MAY, 2006. : 12TH MAY, 2006. : 12TH MAY, 2006. p.c. . Heard Mr. Swapnil Wagh, Advocate for the applicant/accused and Mrs. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the State. 2. By order dated 31st October, 2005 while releasing the applicant on bail the trial Court directed her to report to the investigating authority once in a week. She was also directed not to leave the jurisdiction of the Court without permission. 3. It has been brought to my notice, that the applicant has been following the direction to attend the [2] office of the investigating authority. It seems that the investigation is still going on. Considering the fact, that more than 6 months have been elapsed after passing the order on 31st October, 2006, I do not think it necessary for the petitioner to report any more. The said condition is therefore, deleted. 4. So far as relaxation of another condition, that she should not leave the jurisdiction of the Court without prior permission, the petitioner is directed to approach the trial Court. 5. With these observations, the application is disposed of. (K.J. (K.J. (K.J. ROHEE J.) ROHEE J.) ROHEE J.)