IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21054 of 2010 SANOJ PASWAN . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 25/06/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a police case under Sections- 399 and 402 of Indian Penal Code is of false implication along with his father when co-accused named and apprehended along with him has been enlarged on bail in Cr. Misc. No.487/10. Co-accused was possessed of one cartridge when the petitioner is alleged to be possessed of a loaded country-made with three cartridges. Considering the defence that it was highly unlikely that he was prepared to commit dacoity along with his own father, if the petitioner has no antecedents and is not a named accused in any police case registered prior to the institution of the present let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No.131 of 2009. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)