IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 1ST AUGUST 2011 / 10TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20867 of 2011(G) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- A.K.APPU (AWD NO.7) AUTHORISED WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTOR, IRINJALAKKUDA,RESIDING AT KAIMAPARAMBIL HOUSE, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, IRINJALAKKUDA EAST, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.S.RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,THRISSUR - 680 001. 2. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, THRISSUR - 680 001. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KORATTY - 680 308. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 20867/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE FIR DATED 17/06/2011 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P2: COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL.MP.NO.8190/2011 IN CRIME NO.635/2011 DATED 22/06/2011 IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, CHALAKUDY. P3: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B.1831/2011 DATED 20/06/2011 ISSUED BY TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER, MUKUNDAPURAM. P4: COPY OF THE MAHAZAR DATED 20/06/2011. P5: COPY OF THE DISCHARGE SUMMARY OF THE PETITIONER DATED 08/07/2011 ISSUED BY DR.JOBY ABRAHAM. P6: COPY OF PETITION DATED 18/06/2011 FROM THE PETITIONER'S COUNSEL TO THE TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER. P7: COPY OF THE PETIION DATED 20/07/2011 FROM THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P8: COPY OF THE ORDER IN WPC NO.16523/2011 DATED 22/06/2011 BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.20867 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of August, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner was appointed as AWD No.7 of Mukundapuram Taluk. Ext.P3 is the order passed by the Taluk Supply Officer, Mukundapuram, suspending the dealership of the petitioner. 2. According to the petitioner, aggrieved by the order of suspension, he filed Ext.P7 before the District Collector. In this writ petition what is sought for by the petitioner is a direction for the expeditious consideration of Ext.P7 appeal. 3. If as stated by the petitioner Ext.P7 petition filed by him has been received and is pending, it is directed that the 1st respondent shall consider the same in accordance with law, with notice to the parties concerned as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within six weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. The Writ Petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ab