1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4550/2007 Anand Rathi vs Raj. Tech. University & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : - 30.7.2007 HON'BLE MR.PRAKASH TATIA,J. Mr.PS Bhati,for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner was found not eligible by the respondents and that was because of the reason that petitioner had no subject of Mathematics in his 10+2 level examination. The petitioner has placed on record the copy of the mark-sheet (Annex.4) by which petitioner cleared the Business Mathematics , but that Business Mathematics has not been recognized as per the communication dated 26th July, 2007. In view of the above reasons and admitted fact that petitioner passed the Business Mathematics and not the full fledged subject Mathematics, therefore, I do not find any merit in the writ petition and petitioner cannot claim any benefit because of the reason that some other persons, who were not eligible on the ground that they also cleared only Business Mathematics subject in level 10+2, therefore, the petitioner should have been allowed to take the 2 course because of any mistake committed by the respondents in granting admission to other students, the petitioner cannot claim the same benefit. Hence, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-