IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3519 of 2011 Decided on: May 19, 2011. Pritam Bhadur ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr.Kush Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A.G. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): According to the petitioner, his case is covered by the judgment of this Court in Phool Maya versus State of H.P.{CWP (T) No. 10220 of 200}. The learned Deputy Advocate General submits that the factual position will have to be verified. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent/competent authority to look into the matter and after verifying the facts, take appropriate action in accordance with law and in light also of the judgment, referred to above, within four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment and a copies of the judgment, referred to above, along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. 2. All the pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Ahuja), May 19, 2011 Judge (tilak/mlg)