IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2888 of 2010. Decided on: 3.6.2010. __________________________________________________ Sandhya Devi … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. … Respondents. ___________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Vijay Bhatia, Advocate. For respondents No. 1&2: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. For respondent No.3 : Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral). The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(i). Writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to grant pension/family pension and other retiral consequential benefits to the petitioner, along with interest from the date of retirement till the date of receipt of payment.” 2. It is submitted that similar case was considered by this court leading to judgment in CWP (T) No. 5728 of 2008, Jagan Nath vs. The State of H.P. and others. It is also submitted that the judgment has been implemented to the best of knowledge of the petitioner. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of as follows: There will a direction to the first respondent to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with law and in 2 the light of the decision, referred to above and take appropriate action subject to its finality within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment and copy of the judgment referred to above. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. (Justice V.K. Sharma) Judge. June 3, 2010. (cr/v)