:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.413 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO.4097/2000 Smt. Kaushalya Ajit Thakkar and anr. ..Plaintiffs. Vs. Mr. Jayantilal D. Pandit and 27 ors. ..Defendants. And Ms.Sangita Ajit Thakkar. ..Applicant. Mr. Bhavesh Parmar for the Applicant. Neville Majra i/by Fathe Kar Associates for the Defendant Nos.1 to 4. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 19/7/2005. P.C.: 1. Heard counsel for the parties. As the applicant is the sister of deceased plaintiff No.2 and daughter of plaintiff no.1, in my opinion, application as filed deserves to be allowed though it has been resisted by the counsel for the defendants on the ground that the suit will continue against the defendants which can be espouse by plaintiff No.1 in her own rights as well as to represent the estate of plaintiff No.2 being mother of plaintiff No.2. In the circumstances, in the :2: interest of justice, chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) (a-1) and (a-2). Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. No order as to costs. (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.)