IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14781 of 2011 BINOD KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 11.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 302, 201, 406 and 118 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner is that the deceased Sanjeev Kumar Das @ Babloo Das had contract with the petitioner in which there was dues of Rs. 12,00,000/-. It is also alleged that the deceased went in the company of the petitioner and was supposed to stay at the residence of the petitioner but at 11 PM the informant received telephonic message that his son became unconscious due to the poisonous food offered by this petitioner. Annexure-2 has been brought on record which suggests that the dead body was found near Saharsa Railway plate form on 04.04.2009 by the cousin brother of the deceased. 2 It appears that no postmortem was done and the present complaint was filed on 14.05.2009 which was registered as a police case on 03.06.2009. It further appears that subsequently, the informant has retracted from his initial version and has filed a petition before the learned court below to that effect. Considering the suspicious nature of accusation and the inconsistent stand of the informant, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Uda Kishunganj P.S. Case No. 69/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)