IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 717 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 26/06/2008 in WP NO : 25236 OF 2007 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Sandhi Narasimha Rao, S/o.Challaiah, R/o.Mallavaram,Narsapur(M), W.G Dist ..... APPELLANT AND 1The Govt.of A.P Rep.by its Secretary,Co-Op Dept,Secretariat,Hyd 2The P.A.C.S Mallavaram(Regd No.F28),Narsapur(M),W.G Dist Rep.by its President 3The Branch Manger, P.A.C.S Mallavaram,Narsapur(M),W.G Dist 4The Dist Cooperative Central Bank, rep.by its Chairman,Eluru,W.G Dist 5The Tahsildar, Narsapur(M),W.G Dist 6The Sarpanch Mallavaram Lanka(V), Narsapur(M),W.G Dist 7The Sarpanch Mallavaram Narsapur(M),W.G Dist 8The Dist Panchayat Officer, Eluru,W.G Dist 9The District Cooperative Officer/ Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Eluru, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.RAMA MOHAN PALANKI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per Anil R. Dave, CJ) The appellant-petitioner is a member of respondent No.2- Society who is aggrieved by an action whereby respondent No.2-Society is putting up construction of its building at Mallavaramlanka Village, Narsapur Mandal, West Godavari District on the land which has been granted by Mallavaramlanka Gram Panchayath. Writ Petition No. 25236 of 2007 ﬁled by the appellant was rejected by an order dated 26-6-2008 mainly on the ground that respondent No.2-Society had decided to construct a building on the land which was allotted to the Society by Mallavaramlanka Gram Panchayath. The appellant is of the view that no building should be constructed in Mallavaramlanka Gram Panchayat but the building should be constructed in Mallavaram Gram Panchayat. The learned Single Judge has rejected the petition by an order dated 26-6-2008 and being aggrieved by the said order, this appeal has been filed. We have heard the learned Advocates and also gone through the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.2. Upon hearing the learned Advocates and upon looking to the facts, it is clear that Mallavaramlanka Gram Panchayat has allotted a piece of land to respondent No.2-Society and respondent No.2 had started construction of a building for the society on the land allotted to it. It appears that except the appellant-member all other members of the society are in favour of constructing a building on the land allotted to the Society. It is also on record that Rs. 4.75 lakhs have been sanctioned for construction of the building and out of the said amount, Rs.2.37 lakhs have already been spent by the Society for the said purpose. At this stage, we do not see any reason to interfere with the decision of the Society with regard to putting up construction on the land allotted to it. If the appellant- petitioner is aggrieved by the decision of respondent No.2- Society, he can challenge the same under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964. We do not ﬁnd any substance in the appeal and the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. _____________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 7th August, 2008. _________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J GRR