IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 19.07.2011 CRM No.M-18254 of 2010 (O&M) Vandana Sandhu ... Petitioner versus State of Haryana & others ... Respondents CRM No.No.M-20455 of 2010 (O&M) Sharda Gupta ... Petitioner versus State of Haryana & others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present: Mr. Pankaj Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** Mahesh Grover, J. (Oral) This order will dispose of above said two petitions. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue the complaint which has already been preferred under Section 200 and the proceedings regarding Section 202 have been initiated and the matter is near pronouncement of the order. Disposed of with liberty to the parties to pursue the matter with Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Faridabad pertaining to the complaint under Section 200 & 202. It is made clear that the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class shall proceed with the matter forthwith and ignore the statement made by the petitioners regarding the fact that High Court CRM No.M-18254 of 2010 (O&M) -2- has given some directions as such directions were non existent. In view of the fact that the petition has been withdrawn, no further orders are required to be given. July 19, 2011 (Mahesh Grover) sonia Judge