/<$/ IN THE HIGiICOURTOF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR ;)- WRIT PETITION N0..;......... / 2006 PETITIONER Ku. Maya Vifhalkar D/o Late Laxman Rao Vithalkar, aged about 50 years, Assistant Teacher posted at Boys Primary School Sakari, Block Takhatpur, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^.^•-": .^s^." '?^""" /'.c?^\n<v':" ^••:<^i^)-^' ^e^.. ^.^-•' ^ z- »p.\&v /l. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / 2. Director of School Education D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) .. ^3. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, 'Kkhatpiu- Block-Takhatpur, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Head Master of Boys Primaiy School, Sakan, Block-Takhatpur, Dist. BUaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE COUNSTITUTION QF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CEERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WMTS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERES: ^ The petitioner above-named most respectfuUy submit as under:- XI-HC-78 33T '^l.'lld^, »TTI^JIS,picii*iy,< ^m HTH^'11 aiHlcb 1^[ 200-^, Sii^i yaqi (yt!3°K<iT) W^T^TR-lIcb (raTsn^Tstiii* <' »S ;- Roshan s^irercfllNsTicRT Acjv. thfat increilnents 11.8.200S:- l-1eard Shri R.S.Patel, oounsel Shri SatishGupta, Dy. Govt. The case of the petitioner is as per the Instructions dated 24-12-9^ Teaohers who have passed B.T.I., B[l expenses after 22-10-64 are entitled Government is Annexure-P/1. The pet| own oost in the year 1990-91 and a o{ the petitioner has not been given the have been granted tv/o advance this Court. Having heard learned counsel and circumstances of the case, withou]t case, the petitioner is allowed to make ^ this petition raising all her grievances| days from today and in tum, respond^nt the petitioner in the light of averments the representation also. If respondent situated persons have been granted the petitioner's case is also covered basis of Government's order, then to today, in accordance with law. With the direction aforesaid, Parties are entitled fpr certified f()r the petitioner. c|v. for the State on advance copy. she is working as Assistant Teacher and issued by the State of M.P. the Assistant [Ed. and M.Ed. examination on their own Ifor two advance increments and order of :jtioner passed the B.Ed examination on her irtiTicate to that effect is Annexure-P/3. but |benefit whereas, similarly situated persons under the orders of the Tribunaland cbi'iitff4i-f ^itii-irTffecii'<Rit<;i< SKSlRriTSII^T |for the parties, having regard to the facts expressing any opinion of the merit of the detailed representation along with copy of to respondent No.2 within a period of 15 No.2 is directed to examine the case of (nade by the petitioner in this petition and in ^o.2 reaohes to the oonclusion that similariy benefit of two advance increments and grant of two advance increments on the orders within a period of 3 months from the fdir ppss the| petition stands disposed of. topyofthisorder. 1. o P.T.O.