1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.152 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Central Excise Kolhapur II Division. ...Appellant. vs. M/s.Preetam Enterprises. ...Respondent. --- Mr.A.S.Rao, for Appellant. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: 16TH July, 2008. P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for appellant. Perused the impugned order. The Tribunal in the impugned order has relied on the previous decision of the Tribunal. The learned Counsel 2 appearing for appellant fairly states that appeals against the orders of the Tribunal mentioned in paragraph 3(i) and 3(iii) of the impugned order of the Tribunal have been dismissed by this Court. In view of this, obviously no question of law arises. The appeal is therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) ---