-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO. 1943 OF 2008 Jaya Satnamsingh Tiwana ....Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents Mr. Nitin Pradhan, instructed by Mr. R.K. Mendadkar & Ms. Helan Mandlik, for the petitioner. Mr. R.J. Mane, AGP, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Pramod Patil for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE: AUGUST 28, 2008. P.C. By filing this petition, the petitioner has challenged the interim order passed by the Divisional Commissioner by which certain preliminary objections taken by the present petitioner has been negatived and it has been found by the Commissioner that since the documents and the annexures have been referred in the petition/pleadings and their source is already indicated therein, merely because absence of mention of the source of knowledge of the information does not vitiate the verification process which is duly undertaken on these documents. -2- 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that since the impugned order is interlocutory in nature, he is not pressing this petition. However, he seeks liberty to challenge the impugned order in appeal, if any appeal is required to be filed by the petitioner against the final order of the Tribunal. Permission is accordingly granted. Subject to the said liberty, this petition is disposed of as not pressed. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. A.A. SAYED, J.