IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP 2753 of 2008. Decided on May 31, 2010. Vijay Kumar and others ..Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. ..Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Appellant Mr. Ashwani K. Gupta, Adv. For the respondents Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Asstt.AG. Surjit Singh, Judge (Oral). This writ petition is covered by judgment, dated 18.5.2010, of a Division Bench of this Court, in CWP No. 1928 of 2008, titled Pawan Kumar v. H.P. Housing & Urban Dev. Authority & others, and connected matters. So, it is disposed of with the following directions, in line with the judgment in the aforesaid cases: (i), Respondents are directed to examine the case of the petitioner, in the light of decisions in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P., 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316 and Gauri Dutt and others vs. State of H.P., Latest HLJ 2008 (HP) 366 and in the light of the Policy framed by the State Government, and prevailing at the relevant Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - time. In case the petitioner asks for an opportunity of being heard, or makes a supplementary representation, same shall also be considered by passing an order. Appropriate order, in accordance with law and in the light of aforesaid directions, shall be passed within a period of three months, from the date of production of copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 2. Writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications. May 31, 2010 (PC). (Surjit Singh), J.