IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2138 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO. 2138 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO. 2138 OF 2005 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L) NO.713 of 2005 (L) NO.713 of 2005 (L) NO.713 of 2005 IN IN IN NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1417 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO. 1417 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO. 1417 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 727 OF 2005 SUIT NO. 727 OF 2005 SUIT NO. 727 OF 2005 Sona Arts & Another .. Applicants V/s Ramesh Keshav Kadam .. Respondent ----- CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. None appears By this Notice of Motion, the Applicant is seeking condonation of 36 days delay. Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)