HIGHCOURT OFGHtWTTISeARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S^N 4t^«rf"2e<» PETITJONBSS RESPONDENTS 1. Hom Lal Saha, Age aboiA 46 year, Astt. Teacher, S/o Late Shri Ifeju Ram Sahu, Govt. Middte School, Ganod, Bk>ck- Arung, Dlstt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Dharmendra Singh Thakur, A@e about 31 ysar, Astl Tsachsr, S/o Shri Bhu^ian Singh Thakur, Primary Sehool, Pitaibaid, Block-Fingeshvrar. Distt.-Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarti, Threugh Secretery, TribalWelfare Departi'nerit & , Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt.-Raipur (C.G.) 2. Dlstt. Educatton Officer, Ratpyr, OlsWct- Raipur (C.G.) 3. Block EdueaBon Oftoer, Arang/Fingeshvrar, District-Ralpur (C.G.) 4. Treasury, Aecount & Penston, Raipur, Dlstrict Raipur (C.G.) WRtT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTtON OF INDIA Single Bench : Hon'ble Mr. JusUce Satteh K. Agnjhotri Present: Shri Ajay Shriwstava, Advocate for ttie pefltioners. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Advocate for ttteState / respondents. ^ ORDER ^assed on thls 1611' day of July, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appeanng tor the petitloners as well as fbr the State/respondents jointly submit that the fect ancl question of law involved in the present wrtt petltion are ttie same to that of in Yashwant Kumar BharadwaJ Vs. Municipal CprporaUon, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04^2006. Leamed ceunsel appearhw tor the respondents does not controyert the saidsubmission. 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ PeUtion (S.) No.413p of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Venna vs. The State 6<wt of CtihaWsyarh sid anathw) Bl- 3. and other connected mattere, decicled by this ^urt en 15-12-2006, pureuant to Uie memo dated 2M-199S, issued by the Seeretary, Board ofSecondary Education, Bhopataml Uie prospectus<rf Diptona in Educadon Examinatton, it was clarifled ftat ttie nomenclature ef Vhe Basto Training tnstitute, j.e., B.T.I. has been changed and rereimed as Diptoma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, ttie D.Ed. Cerfficate holdere are also covered by ttie decisfon in Writ f^Ufion (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Bopesh Kumar Vwma vs. The ^ate ©o»t of WhaWsgarti midanothei) (Supra). Accordingly, the writ petition is altowed in temns ofttie order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar BharadwaJ Vs. Bdunicipat Corporation, Durg and another (Supra). subject to verificatton of ttie fact as to whether ttie petiUoners have acquired D.Ed. Examirertion Certificates on their own experees as per tte ciKMlars dirted 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further wrtiether they have been paid two advanee incremente or not. No onier as to costs. ^ SaushKAgnihotti , judge .1 ^-