IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2371 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- VADODARA MUNICIPAL CORPN. Versus MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 2371 of 1992 MR HARESH J TRIVEDI for Petitioner No. 1 MR PG DESAI for Respondent No. 1-2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI Date of decision: 04/07/2003 It is stated by Mr. P.G. Desai, learned advocate for the respondent that, he has the oral instruction from respondent Corporation to state that, the impugned award has been implemented and the grievance of the petitioner union does not survive as the same has been redressed. Mr. H.J. Trivedi, learned advocate for the petitioner states that, he does not have any instruction as regards the implementation of the impugned award by the respondent Corporation. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as not surviving. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to have recourse in accordance with law, if required. Rule discharged. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. No costs. Dt: 4-7-2003 ( N.G. Nandi, J ) /vgn