IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40092 of 2010 SACHIDA NAND JHA & ANR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02/ 09-Nov-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners have prayed for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 307 and other Sections of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act on the ground that only one fire arm injury is shown to have sustained by the informant and there is specific allegation that the said injury was caused by co-accused, Subodh Singh. Petitioners have further submitted that they have been falsely implicated due to business rivalry. The aforesaid submissions appear relevant for regular bail but it is not possible to hold at this stage that the allegation of presence of other persons including the petitioners at the place of occurrence is false. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of the petitioners if they surrender and seek regular bail. perwez ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)