IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.544 of 2011 SITA RAM MISTRY, SON OF LATE RAGHU MISTRY. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. ----------- 3. 30.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Taking into consideration the order of rejections passed on 13.7.2009 and 19.5.2010. I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, despite the so-called observation that prayer for bail is rejected as for now. In view of the fact that out of 16 witnesses, six witnesses have been examined and 10 are to be examined. It cannot be said that the trial is not being held. There could be an occasion later depending on how trial proceeds further. The court below is directed to ensure the trial is expedited by ensuring presence of all the named witnesses on due priority. Devendra/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)