IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHNAD AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 426 of 2008 Smt. Upasana Tyagi & Others. ........ Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. ........ Respondents Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against petitioner nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 & 6 before the Circle Officer concerned on 29.08.2008 whereas petitioner nos. 4 & 7 have not been chargesheeted as no prima facie evidence is collected against them, and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit the chargesheet before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicate in Para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 11.06.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 02.12.2008 V.K