IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH MARCH 2011 / 25TH PHALGUNA 1932 Tr.P(C).No. 382 of 2010() ----------------------------------- O.P.NO.587/2010 of FAMILY COURT, ALAPPUZHA .................... PETITIONER -------------------- MRS.LATHIKA K.S., AGED 34, D/O.KUNNATH SREERAMAN, RESIDING AT "KUNNATH", TAMPANKADAVU DESOM, THALIKULAMVILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.THIYYANNOOR RAMAKRISHNAN SRI.ARUN KUMAR.P SMT.AMBIKA RADHAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- MR.SUMESH, AGED 40, S/O.RAJAN, RESIDING AT "KALATHIL HOUSE", ERAMALLOOR P.O., CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts P. BHAVADASAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Tr.P.(C). No. 382 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of March, 2011. ORDER This petition is filed for transfer of O.P.587 of 2010 pending before the Family Court, Alappuzha to Family Court, Thrissur to be tried and disposed of along with O.P. 2049 of 2010 filed by the petitioner. 2. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent took place on 21.4.2001 at Thrissur and they have a girl child in that wedlock. Several facts are mentioned in the petition, which are not very relevant for the present purpose. Suffice it to say, the parties are fallen apart. The petitioner has instituted O.P.2049 of 2010 before the Family Court, Thrissur for return of gold ornaments. In retaliation. the husband filed O.P.587 of 2010 before the Family Court, Alappuzha for divorce. 3. The petitioner would point out that she finds it difficult to attend the court at Allappuzha with the infant Tr.P.C. 382/2010. 2 child since she is residing at Thrissur. Accordingly, she prays that O.P.587 of 2010 pending before the Family Court, Alappuzha be transferred to Family Court, Thrissur. 4. Notice is seen served on the respondent. There is no appearance for the respondent. In the light of the facts stated in the petition, which are not controverted, there is no reason as to why the prayer should be rejected. In the result, this petition is allowed and it is ordered that O.P.587 of 2010 pending before the Family Court, Alappuzha shall stand transferred to Family Court, Thrissur to be tried along with O.P.2049 of 2010. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sb.