RSA No. 4 of 2009 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 4 of 2009 Date of Decision: 14.7.2009 Ashwani Kumar .....Appellant Versus Smt. Bimla Devi and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Sanjay Verma, Advocate, for the appellant. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral). The plaintiff is in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, whereby the decree for mandatory injunction directing the defendants to remove lintel of the roof, was dismissed. It has been found by the learned first Appellate Court that the construction was raised in August, 2002 and after five years it will a great hardship to defendant No.1, if such a decree is granted. A perusal of the judgment and decree shows that the construction was raised in August, 2002 as per the case set up by the plaintiff. The present suit was filed on 18.10.2002. In view of the said fact, I do not find any patent illegality or material irregularity in the finding recorded by the Courts below, which may RSA No. 4 of 2009 (2) give rise to any substantial question of law in the present appeal. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 14.7.2009 ds