IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2011 / 12TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21159 of 2011(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. CHACKO JOY, S/O. JOY.T.C, THEKKEKARA THARAKAN HOUSE, CHITTILAPPILLY VILLAGE, POST, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. AVINAASH.M, S/O. MOHAN KRISHNA, PACHAJANYAM, THIRUVULLAKKAVU, CHERPU VILLAGE POST, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. SOLY FRANCIS, D/O. FRANCIS, VALLACHIRAKARAN HOUSE, CHERPU WEST VILLAGE POST, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.K.DILEEP KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, MALAPPURAM - 673 633. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENJIPALAM POST, MALAPPURAM - 673 633. BY SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW - SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 21159 of 2011(T) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD.12.7.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER EXT.P2: COPY OF FEES REMITTING CHALAN OF THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P3: COOPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD.11.7.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P4: COPY OF FEES REMITTING CHALAN OF THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD.12.7.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER. EXT.P6: COPY OF FEES REMITTING CHALAN OF THE 3RD PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.21159 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2011. J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 7th Semester examination was declared, they had failed in some papers. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ab