IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13006 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 26, 2010. Sanjeev Bansal .....Petitioner versus Oriental Bank of Commerce and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks quashing of the orders dated 25.5.2007/28.5.2007; 26.3.2010 and 15.6.2010 (Annexures P-3A, P-5 & P-6) passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-II, Chandigarh and the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi respectively, whereby his objections have been dismissed. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned orders in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Suffice it to say that the petitioner having stepped into the shoes of the allottee, is liable to pay the dues of the Housing Board. After paying the dues and getting 'No Objection Certificate' from the Housing C.W.P.No .13006 of 2010 2 Board, the petitioner shall be at liberty to raise his claim against the respondent-bank in accordance with law. Disposed of. Dasti. July 26, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE