IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50068 of 2008 NIRMAL KUMAR SAHA … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri Shiwesh Chandra Mishra For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta, A.P.P. ----------- 3. 14.1.2009 Heard. The renewal prayer is on the ground that in spite of having been in custody for about two and a half years, the petitioner is yet to get justice. The report appearing at Flag ‘A’ submitted by the learned trial Judge indicates that two witnesses have been examined and further more witnesses are to be examined in the Case. The contention is that there were as many as 16 witnesses and two witnesses have been examined in a period of about one year of framing of the charges. I could direct the learned Special Judge, Katihar, to keep in his mind the plight of the petitioner of being in custody and the trial not being brought to an end in spite of the petitioner being charged for a year or so before. The trial must be concluded within further period 2 of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the present order by the trial court. The petition is dismissed in view of the quantity of the Ganja recovered from the petitioner. Kanth (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)