IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8067 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- SATRA VELJI HIRJI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR YS MANKAD for Petitioners MR MA BUKHARI for Respondent No.2, 3 None present for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 31/07/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT #. On 2.9.92, this court has made the following order: "Rule. As regards interim relief, it appears that the grievance made by the petitioners have not been properly looked into and the inquiry said to have been made by the authorities appears to be highly unsatisfactory and casual. Persons who are making the grievance are not examined and it is stated that they are not available. Persons against whom allegations are made and commission is alleged, are examined. In view of these circumstances, it would be just and proper to direct an inquiry by an independent agency. Respondent no.3 is said to be the superior officer than the District Supply Officer who had conducted the inquiry. The Collector is therefore, directed to make an inquiry into the allegations made by the petitioners and make a written report to this court within three weeks from today." #. The report prepared in pursuance of the court's order is produced in the court today. A copy of the same is also given to the counsel for the petitioner. Mr.Mankad submits that in view of this report, nothing now survives in the special civil application. Accordingly, this special civil application is dismissed. Rule discharged. Interim relief, if any, earlier granted stands vacated. No order as to costs. ....... (sunil)