1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8649 OF 2009 Bhalchandra Sidramappa Dodmani & Ors. .. Petitioners. Vs. Jaykumar Jagannath Manthalkar & Ors. .. Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8650 OF 2009 Bhalchandra Sidramappa Dodmani & Ors. .. Petitioners. Vs. Solapur Gram Udyog Telghana Sahakari Society Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.S.S.Shah for the petitioners. Mr.R.M.Patne AGP for respondent nos.4 to 6 in WP No.8649/09 and for respondent nos.2 to 4 in WP Nos.8650/09. Mr.V.V.Purwant for respondent nos.1 to 3 in WP No.8649/09. Mr.I.M.Khairdi for respondent no.1 in WP No.8650/09. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 13TH APRIL, 2010. P.C. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents waive service. By consent taken up for final hearing. 4. By these writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 31.8.2009 passed by respondent no.6 whereby two revision applications filed by respondent nos.1 to 3 in writ petition no. 8649/09 and respondent no.1 in writ petition no.8650/09 have been allowed and the judgment and order dated 6th April, 2009 passed by S 2 the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Pune Division, Pune has been set aside. By this order the Divisional Joint Registrar allowed three appeals filed by the three petitioners challenging the order dated 22.12.2008 passed by the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Solapur City, Solapur. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Counsel for the parties have fairly stated that I need not record reasons for disposal of these petitions and they have agreed for the following order: The judgment and order dated 31.8.2009 passed by respondent no.6 is set aside. The revision application nos.559/09 and 558/09 are restored to file. Respondent no.6 shall endeavour to decide the revision applications afresh within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order, after giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners and the respondents. While passing this order I shall not be understood to have examined the merits of the case. Rule is made absolute. No costs. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)