IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NANINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 393 of 2008 Majhar S/o Nathu & Another .......... Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ........ Respondents Mr. Subhash Tyagi, Advocate vice Mr. M.S. Tyagi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B. S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Heard Mr. Subhash Tyagi, Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. B. S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. 2. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the respective parties; perusal of the contents of FIR; the averment made against the petitioners; the fact that the injurned Naseem has sustained injuries on the date of the alleged incident; the fact that out of these injuries, two injuries are of grievous nature; the fact that the FIR discloses a cognizable offence at the outset; and in the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any good ground to grant the relief which they have claimed in this petition. 3. Petition is liable to be dismissed and is dismissed summarily. 4. However, it is made clear that I am not making any comments on the merits of the case as it would prejudice the trail which is yet to start. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 19.12.2008 PRABODH