THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO : 6838 of 2000 Dated: 17.6.2010 Between: P. Murali Prasad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Director Personnel, JENCO, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad and another. .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO :6838 of 2000 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the proceedings Dated 14.10.1996 made in Lr.No.DS/DS(P)/DM (R)115-G1/A1/96-2 on the file of the 1st respondent as illegal and arbitrary and further to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment to the post of L.D.C. on compassionate grounds. It is the case of the petitioner that his father died on 9.5.1992 while in service as Line Inspector in Puttur Division and then, he made an application to the respondents seeking employment on compassionate grounds in June, 1992 itself and after repeated requests and representations, the 1st respondent rejected the representation vide the proceedings impugned herein on the ground that his mother was a Government Teacher. On that, the petitioner made representations on 5.11.1996 and 6.7.1998 stating that his mother was retired from service. But, so far the respondents did not pass any orders. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed. Heard the learned Counsel on record and perused the material available on record. Before going into the merits of the case, it is pertinent to note that the father of the petitioner died on 9.5.1992 while in service as Line Inspector in Puttur Division and then, he made an application to the respondents seeking employment on compassionate grounds in the month of June, 1992 itself and the 1st respondent rejected the representation vide the proceedings impugned herein on the ground that his mother was a Government Teacher. While so, the petitioner filed the present writ petition in the year 2000, on the ground that the respondents have not passed any orders on the subsequent representations made by him on 5.11.1996 and 6.7.1998. It is not known as to what has prevented the petitioner in approaching the Court immediately after rejection of his representation in the year 1996. No explanation is forthcoming in this regard. From these circumstances, it can be said that the approach of the petitioner at this belated stage, does not appear to be a bonafide one. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _______________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari Date: 17th June, 2010 nn. THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO :6838 of 2000 17/06/2010