:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.647 OF 2004 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1399 OF 2004 Jitendra Naranji Chande ..Plaintiff. Vs. Shaukat Dayani ..Defendant. Mr.M.M.Kenia for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. DATED: 24TH AUGUST, 2005 DATED: 24TH AUGUST, 2005 DATED: 24TH AUGUST, 2005 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : The suit is filed to recover the amounts due in respect of three promissory notes executed by the Defendant. The execution of the promissory notes is not denied. It is only alleged that the name of the Plaintiff was filled-in by rubber stamp and was not there when the promissory notes were executed. There is no explanation why the promissory notes were executed. 2. In the circumstances, there is no defence to the suit. 3. The Summons for Judgement is therefore made absolute with costs. :2: Refund as per rules.