\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S! No. 2208 OF 2008 Badal Chandra Mndai, s/o Late Shri Moti Lal Manal, aged about about 51 years, Presently pted and working as ccounts Officer, Office of the Teecom strict Gera! Manar, Raipur Bharat d t (C Sanchar Nigam Limite, Dist. Raipur .G). Vs. 1. Bhara Sahar Nigam Limited, thugh Chief General Manager, Chhattisgarh Teiecom Circle, Raipur (C.G). 2. The Chief General I Manager, (Disciplinary Authority), Bharaf Sanchar Nigam Limited, Chhattisgarh Telecom Circle, Raipur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON ‘ ‘ INDIA STITUTION OF Aggearance : Shri Praveen Tulsyan, Counsel for the Petitioner. Shri RM. Solapurkar, counsel for the respondents. MM (13.04.2009) N— SUNIL KUMAR SINHA J, Shri Praveen Tulsyan, learned counsel for the petitioner prays l for adjournment to argue this matter. apprise Shri R.M. Solapurkar, learned counsel for the respondents, s this Court about the present status of the matter particularly ‘ that the subject enquiry itself has been concluded and the final order l has been passed. In the light of above developments which hav do, ,llk L i am not inclined to grant adjournment in the matter. r Heard. e taken place, l This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs: \ T \x‘ l l i , V a d os A l Di ne ge PETITIONER RESPONDENTS t nc ro 2 W,P(S) No.2208/2008 $5 10. RELIEF(S) SOUGHT 10.1 That, the Respondent Authorities may kindly be commanded to produce the entire records of the proceeding in question for kind perusai of this Hon’bie Court. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindiy be pieased to quash the Charge Sheet dated 26m November, 2005 and departmentai enquiry proceedings initiated against the petitioner. 10.3 That, this Hon‘ble Court may further be pieased to pass any other order, issue any such writ or direction in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents as it may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case with costs'. Shri RM. Soipurkar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents makes statement that the enquiry itself has been concluded by order dated 12.1.2009 and thereafter the punishment order has been issued on 04.04.2009. He submits that the enquiry I report as also the punishment order have been filed by the petitioner himself in M.C.C.No.181/2008, which is also listed for hearing on today. This factual position is not disputed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. ln view of the fact that the enquiry itself has been concluded and the punishment order has been passed. this writ petition for the above reliefs has now become infructuous. ln view of all this, the petition is dismissed at the motion stage itself. There shall be no orders as to costs/A I . " /KM/