IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 20TH DECEMBER 2011 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 34204 of 2011(A) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ SREEDHARAN M.V., MAVILA VEEDU, PORAKKODY, KOYYAM P.O., KARUMBAN VIA, KANNUR. (FORMERLY WATCHER/PEON, COLLEGE OF APPLIED SCIENCE, PATTUVAM, KUTTIKKOL P.O., TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR-670141) BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, (IHRD) REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR, INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI. M.A.FAYAZ ADV.SHRI V.A.MUHAMMED FOR R2(SC) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 12/07/2011. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.06.2011. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 15.03.2011 IN W.A.NO.1616/2010. EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 08.12.2011. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE ln T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.34204 of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 20th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner was engaged by the 2nd respondent in the year 2004 as a Watcher-cum-Peon on daily wage basis in the College of Applied Science, Pattuvam. It is averred that Exhibit P1 will show that the engagement was on payment of Rs.120/- per day. The appointment was effective upto 11.10.2006 and thereafter he was terminated from service. The petitioner is now claiming the benefit of Exhibit P3 judgment of this Court. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent submitted that the direction in Exhibit P3, prima facie, may not help the petitioner. 3. I am not going into the merits of the matter, since the petitioner has filed a representation as per Exhibit P4. There will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to furnish suitable reply to the petitioner within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. SD/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn