IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1246 of 2011 1. Ramji Roy @ Ramji Kumar @ Ramji Yadav S/O Bihari Roy R/O Village - Anandpur At Present Bahpura, P.S. Bihta, District – Patna. ….Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. ….Opposite Party. ---------------------------------- 3. 05.12.2011 The accused petitioner has preferred this revision application against the order dated 16.09.2011 passed by the learned Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No. 241 of 2011 by which the appeal has been dismissed and the order dated 03.08.2011 passed by the Principal Member, Juvenile Justice Board at Patna City, rejecting the prayer of the bail of the petitioner in Bihta P.S. Case No. 83 of 1997 under Section 302/34 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, has been confirmed. It is submitted that the petitioner is a juvenile declared by the Juvenile Justice Board, the prayer for bail was rejected by order dated 03.08.2011 by the J.J. Board. The petitioner filed Criminal Appeal No. 241 of 2011, which has been dismissed and the prayer of the petitioner for bail has been rejected on the ground that the release of the petitioner will not be in the interest of justice and he will go into the association of known criminal and also expose him to physical, moral and psychological danger. It is further submitted that there is no material in the case diary or on the record to conclude this fact. He has further submitted that a report was also called for from the 2 probation Officer and there is nothing against him in the report. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. The learned counsel for the State could not controvert the contention of the petitioner while opposing the prayer of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances, it appears that the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is correct. The impugned order is set aside, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) only with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Juvenile Justice Board at Patna City in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 83 of 1997, G.R. No. 573 of 1997 (Misc. Case No. 4/11) on the following conditions: (i) that the father of the petitioner will take care of the petitioner and will produce him in the Court of Juvenile Justice Board as and when required, (ii) the petitioner will not indulge in similar or any other offence (iii) in the case of absence for two consecutive dates bail his bonds would be liable to be cancelled (iv) in the case of violation of the terms of the bonds, his bail bonds would be liable to be cancelled by the Juvenile Justice Board and the petitioner will be taken into custody. In the result this application is allowed. Kamlesh (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)