WP(C) 1531/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA. Heard Mr. A. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. M. K. Misra, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department. By means of this writ petition, the three petitioners have prayed for re gularization of their services as Assistant Teacher having regard to long length of their services allegedly rendered from 1992, 1988 and 1994 respectively. Mr. M.K. Misra, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department by placing reliance on the decision of this Court in reported in (2003) 3 GLT 544 (Jahangir Alam & O rs v. State of Assam & Ors) submits that in terms of the said judgment, the peti tioners, who have been appointed by the respective Managing Committees of the sc hools de horse the Recruitment Rules are not entitled to regularization of their services. In the said judgment, this Court has held that the Honorary Teachers appointed de horse the Recruitment Rules, are not entitled to regularization of their services. Pursuant to the said judgment of this Court, the Government of Assam in the Education (Elementary) Department issued Annexure-13 office memorandum dated 21.1.2004 reiterating the ratio laid down in the said judgment. In the said off ice memorandum, it has been provided that such Honorary Teachers are entitled to relaxation of age in the event of candidatures being offered against future vac ancies. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the only prayer of the petitioners is for consideration of their case in terms of the said office m emorandum dated 21.1.2004. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of providing that in the event of future vacancies and eligibility of the petitioners to offer candi datures against the same, the respondents may relax the age bar applying the pro visions of the said office memorandum dated 21.1.2004. Writ petition is disposed of.