1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No. 1530 of 2006 with Review Petition Stamp No.7402 of 2006 in Writ Petition No. 6811 of 2002 The State of Maharashtra. .Applicant. vs Ms Jaymala Joytiram Ade. . Respondent. Mr. S.R.Nargolkar, AGP for State. None for the respondent. CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR, Acg, C.J. & SMT NISHITA MHATRE , J. DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 2006 P.C.: In Writ Petition No.6811 of 2002 the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal in Original Application No.319 of 2002 was challenged. By the order of which review is sought, the petition was dismissed. 2. The review is sought on the ground that unwarranted complications have arisen because of certain observations 2 made in that order. By a subsequent communication the present petitioner demanded declaration of the result and grant of benefit flowing out of it in the event of her passing. 3. Accordingly we have requested the State to furnish the result of the respondent in this petition for that examination. The result was produced before this court in a sealed cover. It was opened in court and a perusal disclosed that the respondent has failed in the examination. In such circumstances nothing survives in this petition. Review petition accordingly is disposed of. Original result sheet is returned to the State.