IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH MAY 2011 / 20TH VAISAKHA 1933 WP(C).No. 13260 of 2011(F) -------------------------- PETITIONES: --------------- 1. FEBIN JOSEPH, KALLOOR HOUSE, VADANAPPILLY.P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. SAJEESH.S., PULIKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, P.O.POILISSERY, VIA TIRUR-2, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. VINEETH.B., RAGAM HOUSE, PUTHAIKKARA.P.O PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. NIKHIL .A.V., ARAYAIL HOSUE, CHUNGATHARA.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. RAHUL.P.R., RADHIKA BHAVAN, PERUVA.P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 6. SAHEER.K., KOLAKKATTIL HOUSE, P.O.KADUNGAPURAM, PERAKKAL,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 7. RAHUL.S.R., KRISHNA HOUSE, KAVIYOOR, CHOKLI POST, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ SRI.P.M.ABDUL JALEEL (KODUNGALLUR) RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, P.O.THENKIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, P.O.THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI P.C. SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.K.MOHANAN,J. ----------------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.13260 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of May, 2011 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioners is that though the petitioners had preferred applications for re-valuation of their answer scripts of B.Tech course, Mechanical Engineering, the same have not been considered so far and no result is published. 2. The applications preferred by the petitioners for revaluation of papers and the papers to be revalued are as follows: The first Petitioner appeared for the 4th Semester and he failed in two papers i.e., ENO4 401(a) Engg.(Mathematics (IV) and MEO4 403 (Thermo Dynamics). He applied for revaluation of the above papers vide Ext.P1 application. The 2nd Petitioner appeared for 6th semester and he failed in two papers i.e., ME 04 604 Finite Element Method and ME 04 606 Dynamics of Machinery and applied for revaluation of the said W.P(C)NO.13260 of 2011 :-2-: papers vide Ext.P2 application. The 3rd petitioner had appeared for the 4th and 6th semester examinations. In the 4th semester he failed in Engineering Mathematics (IV) and Thermo dynamics. In the 6th Semester Examination he failed in IC Engines and Gas Turbine, and Computer Integrated Manufacturing. He applied for revaluation of the 6th semester and 4th semesters as per Exts.P3 and P3(a) respectively. The 4th petitioner failed in Thermo Dynamics in the 4th Semester and in Finite Element Method and Dynamics of Machinery in the 6th Semester. He preferred Exts.P5 and Ext.P5(a) applications for revaluation of 4th and 6th Semester respectively. The 5th petitioner failed in Advanced Machines of Solids in the 4th Semester and in Operation Research and Finite element Method in the 6th Semester. He preferred applications for revaluation in 6th semester and 4th semester as Ext.P7 and P7(a) respectively. W.P(C)NO.13260 of 2011 :-3-: The 6th Petitioner failed in four subjects in 6th Semester i.e. (i).ME 04 601-1C) Engineering and Gas Turbines ; (ii) ME 04 602) Machine Design ; (iii) ME 04 604 Finite Element Method and ME 04 606 Dynamics of Machinery. He failed in MEO4 403 Thermo Dynamics in the 4th Semester. He preferred applications for revaluation of the above subjects in Semester 6 and Semester 4 as Exts.P9 and P10 respectively. The 7th Petitioner failed in the 6th Semester in ME 04-601 Engine and Gas Turbine. He filed Ext.P11 application for revaluation. 3. Standing counsel for the respondents submitted that if the applications preferred by the petitioners are proper, the same can be directed to be disposed of within a reasonable time. 4. In the light of the above facts and circumstances involved in the case and in view of the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, this writ petition is disposed of directing W.P(C)NO.13260 of 2011 :-4-: the respondents to revalue the papers of the petitioners as requested by them as per Ext.P1 to P11 if the said applications are otherwise in order and publish the result within ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment which will be produced by the petitioners. The writ petition is disposed of as above. V.K.MOHANAN, Judge. KVM/- W.P(C)NO.13260 of 2011 :-5-: