IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5479 of 2008(O&M) Date of Decision 08.10.2009 Sulekh Chand ...... Petitioner VERSUS Om Parkash and others ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.J.P.Sharma, Advocate, for Mr.Pankaj Nanhera, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.R.K.Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL): Aggrieved against the order dated 24.12.2007, passed by Ld. Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jagadhri Distt. Yamuna Nagar, allowing the application of the respondents for setting aside the compromise decree, the petitioner has preferred this petition. The application for setting aside the compromise decree was filed on the ground that the compromise, on the basis of which the decree was passed, was not lawful. Heard. In view of the judgments delivered in cases Banwari Lal vs. Smt.Chando Devi (through L.R.) and another, AIR 1993 SC 1139 and Pushpa Devi Bhagat (D) by L.Rs. vs. Rajinder Singh and others, AIR 2006 SC 2628 (1), the application was maintainable. In any case, this revision petition being against an interim order is not maintainable. As such, the same is dismissed. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 08.10.2009 mamta-II