^lgtu'-1 e IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION (C| No. &^c\ QF 2006 ^y Petitioner Abdul Haneef, S/o. Abdul Gaffar^ aged about 29 years, Occupation Bus operator, R/o. Moudhapara, Raipur, Tahsil & Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Respondents .•^' .^' 1) State Transport AppeUate Tribunal ^ Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) l^ i0^3..<y2) Regional Transport Authorily^ :'v.-<ff?> ..••• _-- - ^ _ - __. -/ 'Y...l-"5o^T" ...-"" Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) .•••"1^"€>^-" ,, A.c?--'' 3) Mustaque AU, S/o. Late Matkiob Ali/ R/o. Rajatalab, Raipur, TahsU and District Raipur (C.G.). r>-. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE'226^^'T OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WMTS, ORDER/ORDERS. DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS etc. XI-HC-78 Hl+lfll ShHieh 7SI -^WM^, Wi^WW, Rldlti^ ^-.^.f>:.M3.?.......^. ^. W^'"""M'^rf'—"^ 200< 311^1 Msitft (ti.':li^<!l<(.liT) sn^T^TRaw (raTSII^Ts.bli* ? ^l ^ STflTWBferaii^T 9.1.; Smt. Hamida Siddiqui learn Heard. Ratour This petition is directed agi Transport Appellate Tribunal, No.3 has been allowed and the directed to issue permanent permif Learned counsel for the pe( said order permanent permir ha^ No.3. The only grievance of the respondent No.3 timing has been the petitioner. From perusal of the impugrjed there is no infirmity, illegality or jt(risdict Which calls for any interference ff Constitutjon of India. The grievartjse be redressed by the competent aijthority him, in accordance with iaw. Thus thp petition has no[ dismissed. !t is hereby dismissed. <tii<(F<-i41-i iiHnTfffet;ft'<Riwit ^srf^TSIT^T •d counsel for the petitioner. Mnst the order dated 21 .8.2006 Qf State whereby the appeal of respondent pegional Transport Authority has been in favour of respondent No.3. |:itioner submits that in pursuanceof the i^ already been granted to respondent Fjetjtioner is that while granting permit to ^o fixed that it collides with the timing of orderthis Court is oftheopinion that jt(risdictional error in the impugned order 1-om this Court under Article 227 of the of the petitioner regarding timing can on representation being made by merit and the same is liabte to be Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.