1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. O R D E R Gram Panchayat, Dangri Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5662/2008 Date of Order : : 22/08/2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr.Sandeep Shah, for the petitioner. Mr.Alkesh Aggrawal, Dy.Govt.Counsel. BY THE COURT: Issue notice for final disposal. Mr.Alkesh Aggrawal, Deputy Government Counsel appearing for the Panchayat Department accepts the notice on behalf of the respondents. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is finally heard and decided at admission stage. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner made a representation to the respondent No.2 District 2 Collector, Jaisalmer vide Annexure-17 dated 28th of April, 2008 after conclusion of the enquiry but the same has not been decided as yet and, therefore, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent-District Collector to decide the representation Annexure-17 filed by the petitioner utmost expeditiously. It appears from the record that the petitioner earlier filed a writ petition being S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7326/2006, which came to be disposed of by order dated 7th of March, 2008 directing the respondents to conclude the enquiry after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned persons including applicant, who has moved application before this Court, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by Annexure-16 dated 17th of April, 2008, the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad concluded the enquiry and thereafter, the Sarpanch of the petitioner-Gram Panchayat, Dangri made a representation to the respondent No.2 vide Annexure-17 on 28th of April, 2008 but the same has not yet been decided. In my view, there could be no reason in not deciding the representation of the petitioner when the matter has already been concluded in the inquiry. In the circumstances, therefore, the respondent No.2 3 is directed to consider and decide the representation Anneuxre- 17 dated 28th of April, 2008 utmost expeditiously preferably within a period of one month from producing the certified copy of the order of this Court. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (H.R. PANWAR), J. NK 4 S.B.CIVIL MISC.STAY APPLICATION NO.10107/2008 IN S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5662/2008 Date of order : : 22/08/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Sandeep Shah, for the petitioner. Mr.Alkesh Aggrawal, Dy.Govt.Counsel. Since the writ petition itself has been disposed of, the stay petition also stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. NK