1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Letters Patent Appeal No. 134 of 2011 In WP No. 318 of 2011 Manish v. Pushpak and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr C.S. Kaptan, Adv for appellant Mr Sharma, Advocate for respdt no.1 Coram: D.D. Sinha and A. P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 29th March 2011 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for respondent no.1. 2. This Letters Patent Appeal is filed against the order dated 10.3.2011 passed by the learned single Judge whereby Writ Petition No. 318 of 2011 filed by the appellant came to be dismissed. 3. The issue pertains to Rent Act. Petitioner is a tenant of respondent no. 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that before we consider the issue on merits of the appeal, if respondent no.1/landlord is ready and willing to permit the appellant to retain the rented premises for a period of three months from today, appellant shall not press the present appeal. Learned counsel for respondent-landlord accepts the proposal and submits that the petitioner should vacate the rented premises in question on expiry of three months 2 and shall hand over possession of the rented premises to respondent no. 1 on or before 30th June 2011. 4. In the circumstances, petitioner is entitled to retain the rented premises only for a period of three months from today and shall vacate the same by handing over possession of the rented premises to respondent no.1/landlord on or before 30th June 2011. 5. In the circumstances, Letters Patent Appeal disposed of as not pressed. JUDGE JUDGE joshi