IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 4383 of 2011 Smt. Bishni Devi .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Vikram Anand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, DAG, Punjab, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. On 25.4.2011, this Court had already issued direction that official respondents shall ensure that the petitioner is not unnecessarily summoned to the Police Station. It was further directed that in case, the petitioner is required for interrogation in FIR No.112 dated 28.5.2004, then the provisions of Section 160 Cr.P.C. shall be complied with. Inadvertently, the petitioner was referred to 'she', whereas the accused person is the son of the petitioner for which she has approached this Court for seeking this relief. In view of this order, the right of the petitioner is well protected. Accordingly, no further orders are needed in this case. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. November 21, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE