1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER Smt.Shweta Swarnkar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4863/2006 Date of Order : : 05/11/2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr.Rahul Bathi, for the petitioner. Mr.Tarun Joshi, for the respondents. BY THE COURT: By the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged Annexure-4 dated 10th August, 2006 whereby she was denied consideration for the post of Lecturer (English) by the respondent No.2, Rajasthan Public Service Commission (for short “the RPSC” hereinafter. By an interim order dated 1st September, 2006, the respondent-RPSC was directed to call the petitioner to face 2 the interview for the post of Lecturer (English) in pursuance of the advertisement dated 18.8.2004. The respondent-RPSC called the petitioner for interview and allowed her to face interview in pursuance of the direction of this Court. By order dated 21st October, 2008, the respondent-RPSC was directed to produce the result of the interview faced by the petitioner. In pursuance thereto, learned counsel for the respondent RPSC produced the result of the petitioner's interview before this Court in a sealed envelop. The envelop on being opened, it is revealed that the petitioner secured 30 marks and was not found suitable for the post of Lecturer (English). Learned counsel appearing for the RPSC has informed that the cut of marks for OBC category (female) was 54 and reserve list was 51; and for General category (female), the cut of marks was 58 and reserve list was 57. Since the petitioner secured only 30 marks which are much less than cut of marks either in the category of OBC (female) or in the category of General (female), therefore, she was not found suitable for the said post. Keeping in view the marks secured by the petitioner, in my opinion, the petitioner is not entitled for any relief prayed for. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. Stay petition also stands dismissed. 3 Copy of the result has been returned to learned counsel appearing for the respondent which he may sent back to the RPSC. (H.R.PANWAR), J. NK