1 chs1402-11 vai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1402 OF 2011 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.950 OF 2010 L & T Finance Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Nandy S. Reddy & Ors. ...Respondents Ms.Disha Karambar for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C. :- 1. The report of the Court Receiver indicates that the respondents did not obstruct the Court Receiver taking formal possession of the vehicle. The only grievance is that the respondents have not executed the agency agreement despite being requested to do so. 2. The order dated 28.9.2010 directs the Court Receiver to appoint any third party as an agent in the event of the respondents not accepting the agency. The Court Receiver is therefore, bound to do so and in doing so, he would naturally have to take physical possession of the same and hand over the same to the agent. The respondents have 2 chs1402-11 also been given a liberty to bid for the agency. 3. In the circumstances, no further orders are required to be passed in the present chamber summons except that the Court Receiver is directed to implement the order dated 28.9.2010. The chamber summons is accordingly disposed of.