THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.23 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner approached this Court by filing W.P.No.7878 of 2008 complaining that he has not been extended the benefit of appointment on compassionate grounds on account of the death of his father, by name late Md.Sulaiman. The writ petition was disposed of on 10.04.2008, directing respondents 2 and 3 therein to take necessary action on the application submitted by the petitioner, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of that order. This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents did not implement the orders passed by this Court. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for School Education. There was some delay on the part of the respondents in passing the orders as directed by this Court. The learned Government Pleader has placed before this Court, a copy of the proceedings, dated 17.08.2009, issued by the District Educational Officer, Hyderabad District stating that it would not be possible to accede to the request of the petitioner. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the same, he has to work out his remedies vis-à-vis the said proceedings. Though there was some delay on the part of the respondents, they have complied with the directions issued by this Court. Hence, this contempt case is closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his remedies against the proceedings, dated 17.08.2009. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:24.08.2009 Note: Issue cc in one week. (B/o) kdl