-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.46 OF 2006 In WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.2914 OF 2005 Vanita Harischandra Vengurlekar : Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. : Respondents And Abdul Sattar Abdul Rehman : Applicant ... Mr.C.J.Sawant with Mr.R. Ramamurthy for the applicant. Ms Usha Purohit for the petitioner. Mr.G.W.Mattos, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the respondents. ... CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE & S.R.DONGAONKAR,JJ. DATE : MARCH 17, 2006. P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Sawant with Mr.Ramamurthy for the applicant. Ms Purohit appears for the original petitioner and Mr.Mattos, learned Asstt. Govt. Pleader, appears for the respondents. 2. The applicant makes a grievance that he has not been provided with the correct area in the accommodation which ought to be provided to him since the building which he -: 2 :- occupied earlier collapsed and he has to be rehabilitated. Mr.Sawant has pointed out that the matter went upto the Supreme Court and in spite of the orders of the Supreme Court, appropriate steps are not being taken. 3. We have heard Mr.Mattos for the respondents. Mr.Mattos states, on instructions, that within two weeks from today, the applicant will be informed with respect to his correct entitlement and whether he will be provided with proper accommodation and where and when. 4. As such, this Chamber Summons could not have been entertained in the Writ Petition filed by the original petitioner. However, considering the plight of the applicant, we have heard Mr.Sawant appearing for the applicant and in view of the statement made by Mr.Mattos, there is no need to keep this Chamber Summons pending and the same stands disposed of. It will be open to the applicant to take his own steps independently, in the event he is aggrieved by the communication which may be sent to him by the respondent-Board. H.L. GOKHALE, J. S.R.DONGAONKAR, J.