IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR w.P. N03 40% OF zoos PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 4 i“ Rameshwar, Aged about47 years, S/o La‘te Shri Jageshwar Gupta, Occupation: Asstt. Technician Basic Seed Muitiplication & Training Centre, Central Silk Board, Boirdadar, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh), R/o Village — Gopalpur, Koriadadar, P.O. Boirdadar, Raigarh, 496004. Chhattisgarh Versus ’l. Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Textiles, New Delhi. 2. Director, Central Silk Board, Government of India, C.S.B, Complex, BTM Layout, Madivala, Bangalore 560068 fr 3. Member-Secretary, Central Silk Board, C.S.B. Complex, BTM Layout, P.O. Madivala, Bangalore 560068 g 4f Joint Director — cum— Disciplinary Authority, Basic Tassar Silkworm Seed Organisation, Central Silk Board, Ministry of Textiles, Government of lndia, Satyam Commercial Complex, 15‘ Floor, Limk Road, BilaSpur495 001 5. Dy. Director, Basic Seed Multiplication and Training Centre, Central Silk Board, Government of India, Ministry of Textiles, P.O. Boirdadar, Distt. Raigarh (CG) 496004 / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Xl-HC-22 mm 2004 a‘mmmm‘w %Wm ‘ '7 ann‘ it I hvvv Mr. Ranbir‘ Singh Marhas, coumel for- ?He ye‘ri’rioner. Miss Sharmila Singhai, Cen'l’ml Govt Counsei for Union of India/ respondenfs, on advance copy. Heard.. By fha insfan’? wrif pefh‘ionl ’rhe petifioner has chaHenged his Traiisfer‘ order dafed 4-5-2006 (Annex-Lire P-l) whereby he has beenr‘rr‘ansferr'ed from Bairdadar Training Cenfre To Angul. The main ground of challenge i ‘i‘ha‘i he is a low paid Ciass—IV empioyee, rasideni' of goirdadar and he has bee iransferred m‘ a disfance of abouf 500 kims. which is penai in naiure for h m. Moreover, fhe pe‘i‘ifidner is facing enquiry and if wiii be difficulf for himi‘ro come ali ihe way from such a disiam 19 piace To defend his enquiry. Theref re, fhe pefifionerf needs a sympaweiic 4‘ A ai'iii'ude by f‘ne concerned au'ihorit es. ’Normaiiy, fhe iaiv paid Class-IV empioyees are no? iransferred oui- of heir disiricfs. Learned counseivfor 'i'he pe‘rh‘i ner submia‘s fhai’ in *he circumstances, sJne pe'iii'ioner may be allowed 1'0 make! represenfa‘rion To responden‘r No.2 and he be direcied 1-0 consider fhe pefifio r’s case and decide 'i'he represenfaiion. Having heard ieorned counsel f r ihe parfies, having regard i'o ihe foci's and circumstances of The case and wi houf expressing any opinion on merif of fhe case, The reques’f made by iearne counsel for fhe peii'rioner is jus‘i‘, fair and reasonable. Therefore, ihe pe iiioner is allowed To make a dei'aiied reoresenl’a‘lion raising all his grievanc s annexing a copy of ‘l’he wrif peiilion io respondem‘ No.2 wi‘ihin i'en days from oday and respondem‘ No.2 is direc'ied ‘io ltiiaéia‘a XI-HC-22 mm WW "TD Soma decide The represema'fion wifhin or censidering i‘he poim’s raised by f? awn meri‘rs, in accordance wi‘l'h law. Consequenfly, M.(W.)P.No.2( disposed of. Par-fies are emifld for ceN ified copy of This order. e mom'h fmm fhe dafe ¢f H's reczip? af'l'ar e pdifioner, in an objecfive manner, on ifs Wifh fhe direcfion aforesaic , fhe pefifion sfands disposed of. :13/2006 and I.A.No.6681/2006 aiso sfand Sdl- L.C. Bhadoo Judge m. (@W)