IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID MONDAY, THE 29TH AUGUST 2011 / 7TH BHADRA 1933 RP.No. 564 of 2011(O) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OPC.669/2011 Dated 16/06/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): 5TH RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------------------------- NARAYANA MENON, S/O. PUTHIYEDATH KUNJULAKSHMI AMMA, OORAKAM DESOM, ANAKARA AMSOM, PATHIYARKULANGARA P.O., CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.PREMCHAND RESPONDENT(S): WRIT PETITIONER/RESPONDENT 1 TO4 & 6 TO 8: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PAZHANCHERY UNNIKRISHNAN, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O. KARTHYAYANIAMMA, RESIDING IN PAZHANCHERY VEEDU, PUTTEKARA DESOM, ANJOORU VILLAGE,TALAPPILLY TALUK. 2. JANARDHANAN NAIR, (DIED), S/O.PAZHANCHERY KARTHYAYANIAMMA, OORAKAM DESOM, ANAKARA AMSOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, SREE PATHIYARKULANGARA DEVASWOM, PARAMBARYA TRUSTEE, OORAKAM DESOM, ANAKARA AMSOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 3. PAZHANCHERY GOPI, S/O. DEVAKY AMMA, RESIDING AT OORAKAM DESOM, ANAKARA AMSOM, CHAVAKKAD, PATHIYARKULANGARA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS & CULTURAL ENDOWMENT ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, MALAPPURAM. Kss ..2/- ..2.... RP.NO.564/2011 5. ASST. COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS & CULTURAL ENDOWMENT ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, MALAPPURAM. 6. PARUKUTTYAMMA, D/O. PAZHANCHERY MEENAKSHIAMMA, OORAKAM DESOM, ANAKARA AMSOM, PATHIYARKULANGARA P.O., CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 7. KUNJIKAVAMMA, D/O. PAZHANCHERY MEENAKSHIAMMA, OORAKAM DESOM, ANAKARA AMSOM, PATHIYARKULANGARA P.O., CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 8. THANKAMMA, D/O. PAZHANCHERY MEENAKSHIAMMA, OORAKAM DESOM, ANAKARA AMSOM, PATHIYARKULANGARA P.O., CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. R4 & R5 BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN,SC,MALABAR DEVASWOM THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss HARUN-UL-RASHID,J. ------------------------------- R.P.NO.564 OF 2011 IN O.P.(C). NO. 669 OF 2011 ------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2011 O R D E R The 5th respondent in O.P.(C).No.669/2011 is the review petitioner herein. This Court by judgment dated 16th June, 2011 disposed of the said original petition directing the learned Sub Judge, Thrissur to hear and dispose of Ext.P2 application and restoration application on merits. The review petitioner is aggrieved by the lst sentence in paragraph 3 of the judgment, which reads as follows:- “Taking into consideration the grievance of the petitioner that additional plaintiff was not properly conducting the suit, the petitioner should have been impleaded as an additional 2nd plaintiff.” 2. In the above said sentence the only grievance of the petitioner has been stated. In the judgment the observations are made for the purpose of deciding the original petition on merits and not Ext.P2 application and restoration application. The direction -2- RP.No.564/2011 issued by this Court in the judgment is to hear and dispose of Ext.P2 application and restoration application afresh on merits. No direction is issued to consider and dispose of Ext.P2 and restoration application, taking into consideration the observations made by this Court. Therefore, the grievance now raised in the review petition is without any basis. Review Petition is dismissed. It is made clear that the learned Sub Judge shall dispose of Ext.P2 application and restoration application on merits untrammelled by any of the observations made in the judgment. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. kcv. -3- RP.No.564/2011