IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 286 OF 2011 MASSILLON DIAS ... Petitioner Versus THE CHIEF OFFICER MARGAO MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Sahish Mahembry, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. D. Padiyar, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for respondent no.2. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE & U. V. BAKRE, JJ. Date:- 21st December, 2011 P.C. Additional affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no.2 is taken on record. 2. Mr. Naik, learned Counsel for respondent no.2 states that respondent no.2 is not carrying out activities like sale of Kokum Serbath, cashew nuts and lotteries in his shop. The trade licence is for the sale of wooden and glass frames. In the affidavit filed by respondent no.2, respondent no.2 has stated that he is carrying on business of sale of wooden frame within the premises in terms of trade licence. It has been further stated by respondent no.2 that unless and until trade licence/ permission to sell the other items is obtained from respondent no.1, he will not sell any other items from the shop. The statement made on behalf of respondent no.2 is accepted. 3. In view of the statements made above, nothing survives in the present writ petition. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. A. P. LAVANDE, J. U. V. BAKRE, J. SMA