^ / n ?°"-"<< i^:"SSt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.l Petitioner WRITPETITION VfO./Uff f2006 ^:- Ajay Tiwari, S/o Kanhaya Prasad Tiwari, ..^•Y y/o Kantiaya J t'..-;"(p«sp-k'~^Aged about 56 years, Q^.^j®.'^" ...-•" Occupation : Secretaiy, ••••"^-\'^a.--" .....••^^.- ^^' <f\K'\ ....••" ts y ." ?l'T Uti. .G: GRAM SEWA SAMITI, Kutchari Chowk, Raipur (C.G.) Versus 1. Assistant Labour Coniraissioner & Appellate Authority, Chhattisgarh Shop 85 Establishment Act., Raipur (C.G.) 2. Uma Shankar Dubey, House No. 570, Near Football House, Sundamagar, Raipur, District: Raipur, (C.G.) 3. Govind Lal Vora, S/o Late Mohan Lal vora, Aged about 71 years, „ Chief Editor, Anirit Sandesh Press, G.E. Road, Raipur, (C.G.) / 4. Subhash Sharma, S/o Shri Chandra Prakash Sharina, Aged about 52 years, R/o Sunder Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, (C.G.) ^5. Director, State Office, Khadi Ss ViUage Industries Coniinission,14-15 Dani House, Govind Nagar, Raipur, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 QFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITIQN, CERTERORI OR ANY OTHER DIRECTIONfS) OR ORDER(S) ^.s^- \ \^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPJJR PETITIONER WRTT PETmON No. 1668 of2006 Ajay Tiwari. RESPONDENTS VERSUS Assistaiit Labour Comtnissioner Others. \VRIT PEITTtON L7NDER ARIICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SB:,Hon'ble Sln-i Satish K. Aeniliotri. J. Present: None for the petitioner. Shri N.K.Vyas, Advocate &r the respondent No. 2. Shri Rakesh Pande\-, Advocate forthe respondent No. 5. (Passsd on 03m day ofMay, 2011) (-- ^/ The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of tlie petitionei-. Tlie petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In view of the above, the mattei- is dismissed for waiit of prosecution. - — Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Amit