IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12892 of 2011 KAMAL KURAIL S/O NARAYAN KURAIL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 25.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 47 (A) (F) and 48 OF Bihar Excise Act and rule 2 (e), 3, 5(B) and 18 of Bihar State Mahuwa Flower Act. The accusation is of seizure of Mahua Flower weighing around 1395 Kg. in 31 sacks. It appears that seizure was made on 18.06.2010 when the prosecution report was transmitted to the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate on 06.07.2010. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. The delayed transmission of the prosecution report clouds the bonafide of seizure. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks 2 from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with CI No. 16 of 2010, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Indian Penal Code. Safik (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)