1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 136 OF 2003 MIDC Marol Industries Association & Ors. ...Petitioners Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Aditya Chitale, Advocate for the petitioners. Mrs. Shobha Ajitkumar, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. G.W.Mattos, AGP, for respondent Nos. 4 to 6 & 10. Mr. Kiran Ghandi i/b. Little & Co., Advocates, for respondent No.9. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 21st January, 2010. P.C. 1. This petition was entertained as a PIL Petition. Pursuant to that, various directions have been issued. On behalf of the petitioners, the learned Counsel states that the petitioners are satisfied with the steps taken over a period of time and therefore they do not wish to pursue the petition. 2. Considering that the reliefs sought for in the petition have been fructified, in our opinion, the request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner can be granted. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 262 OF 2003 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 136 OF 2003 MIDC Marol Industries Association & Ors. ...Petitioners Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. ...Respondents And Philips India Limited. ...Applicants Mr. Aditya Chitale, Advocate for the petitioners. Mrs. Shobha Ajitkumar, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. G.W.Mattos, AGP, for respondent Nos. 4 to 6 & 10. Mr. Kiran Ghandi i/b. Little & Co., Advocates, for respondent No.9. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 21st January, 2010. P.C. As the petition is disposed of, the Chamber Summons has become infructuous. The same is disposed of as infructuous. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELO,J.)