IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.38731 of 2008 RANJAN SINGH @ MAHTO @ RANJEET SINGH Vrs. THE STATE OF BIHAR **** /3/ 15.12.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is named as accused for offence under Section 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Asmitha, daughter of the informant, is said to have been taken away by Arvind Kumar, Pravin Kumar, Rekha Kumari, Lakhindra Mahto, Mithilesh Devi. Counsel for the petitioner submits that Asmitha, who is a major girl, solemnized her marriage with Arvind Kumar. She herself, after her marriage, reported this matter to the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur. So far petitioner is concerned, he is Up-Sarpanch and his name has been implicated on account of village politics. 3. Considering the facts, the prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioner, Ranjan Singh @ Mahto @ Ranjeet Singh, is allowed. He is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Mushahari P.S. Case No. 48 of 2008 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur. S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )