1 S.B. Civil writ petition No. 3047/2009 Man Mal Singhvi vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order dated 14.12.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.MS Singhvi,for the petitioner. Mr.DS Rathore Dy.GA for the respondent-State. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. The Rajasthan Civil Service Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal of the petitioner vide order dated 4.8.2006 and quashed the order dated 25.1.2006 (Annex.7) and order dated 9.3.2006 (Annex.8), which were filed in the said appeal. The tribunal also restrained the respondents from recovering any amount in pursuance of the said orders. The petitioner by this writ petition virtually seeking implementation of the order of the tribunal dated 4.8.2006 and claiming consequential reliefs of stepping up the pay of the petitioner and consequential revision in the pension and other retiral benefits. The petitioner also prayed for the consequence of revision of pension and retiral benefits including commutation of pension, leave encashment and gratuity as per pay revision undertaken after including the benefit of stepping up of pay which may also be granted with direction for release of full amount of gratuity admissible to the petitioner with interest. No reply has been 2 filed in the writ petition and petitioner is seeking only the consequential relief, which may be in consonance with the order, which has been passed almost more than 3 years ago. In view of the short dispute, the respondents are directed to decide the petitioner's case within a period of two months from the date of this order strictly in accordance with rules keeping in mind that order dated 4.8.2006 has attained the finality and the demand raised against the petitioner has already been quashed by the tribunal. It is reiterated that the Government departments are supposed to act fast when any retiral benefits are claimed by any person and when there is no objection of any other sort. In this case, since the demand against the petitioner been quashed, therefore, the respondents are required to complete the process for grant of reilefs as claimed by the petitioner in the writ petition referred above. The amount which are found due and which have not been paid to the petitioner in accordance with the Rules be paid to the petitioner without any further delay and the respondents shall also pay the interest to the petitioner at the rate equivalent to, which is applicable as per rules on delayed payments. In view of the above, the writ petition of the petitioner 3 is allowed with aforesaid directions to the respondents. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/-