HE§H CG‘JR'F ‘3. {EH-EAT i" ARr‘ A: 3i..Aa?LR ‘v’ Pg‘tmcf‘ {A ‘.22?§ NG.271 G? 2%W \ Peiiiicnei's 1. Sufendra m' ta non o. Manhadh, Piaintiff aged about 25 yearsv 2. Dénesh Gupia, san sf Manhadh, aged abcut21 years; 3. Umesh (Euptet, scn of Manbcdh, agad abaut 17 wars Thrnuah Na‘mrai Guar qr M0? er Jana: Baa Wife 0f Manbedh, aged about .45 years, “i: bemngs ta caste Kaita, Occupatien Agricu!tufey residence cf Gau ama, Tahsii and Eisi{ici .miaaw hhattisgarh. Versas Respandenls 1. :Mcr Dinesh, $0. m' ‘Y’ud ntif aged Eeféiidantg aheut ? years, Thrc'ugn Next mud Guard§an Faiher \(udishtir, acr o. Aiesk caste Ko!ta, wc-‘Mtaon g; Agricuiiure 2. ‘Viarsoau am fix. “ru Gupt ,aged 'Abont 5G ,eas catta Kaita. N“ awn A§r 'i Respandent i' 3 am‘ 2 residence of via e GaJtam! Tahsi! and Qésizrict na garr, mwqmsgarh. 3- m i: daug‘ ter of Nanhu wife sf Bbam aged abaut 58 year$, caste Exoua, resédence Gf vmage Tinmmt Tahsil and District Raigam. Chhai‘zisgarh. 4‘ Mam daugrie. 0‘ Nanah wife sf Margeas, a ed abew 52 y c eée Kata, resmence 0f Vin V Tetie, Tahel and District Raigarhi C.Gi 5. Khedi ”"ug iei cf .ianhu wee 0i H e“ i aged abhui 5': y are, caste “oi , .es eme er Viiia e Gdekera, Tahsi! and District Raigerh, V Ch'natiiegerh Siaie sf Chi‘attieg n inauga Caiector, .migarh Chh itsgari‘ Wni P mien und Articie 227 of the benszitueen cf indie) ag/F MnCJKRas, counsei f .' the pe‘iiioners. .Fatei, Nsne present far respondents N02 is . Mr.8um§i J'nanwar, Panei Lawyer for re3pondent i‘wfiotai ‘ é . UJ Gun‘sei fc.’ respondent No.1. )r C) hr wH'. $3: Honia‘ie Mr. TP. $harma, m; t x $R§ER (1 1—1 3—201 '1) A.- . By W3 ‘ 'ni petition under Articte 22? at the Constituttsn cf indta the petittaners have chnttenged the iegattty and prepnety cf the Order dated 5.12mi) passed by the Civit Judge Ctass—t, Raigarh, in Civti Suit NOS‘: 4%56. After same arguments, teamed ceunset for the petttteners seeks to N3 t. 'tthdraw this V rit eetitten and submits that tn the tight et’ reiie‘i ctause E cf para .5 of the piei. t, the Ceurt beiew has directed fer payment of ed~ voiuram ceurt fees, but the present petitioners are not party ete the k miteged saie deed dated 19.5.2G93, therefere, they are hat required te seek any reii r' ef deci rattan ct sate deed nuti and veta‘ and deet ration that the aiieged sate deed is net bindtng upon them weuid serve the pur eee, therefore, the peti'ioners wan to amend their piaint to the atereeaid extent and ih that circumstances, payment of adwoiuram court tees wouid not ‘oe necessary to the ptaindn + $5 . The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid iioerty. No C)it nvr‘ VI Ute: r ah an r tG Cuato. nn'r‘ interim apniication stands dispoeed or“. 4‘ Sd/— T. P. Shanna Judge