IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.32464 of 2011 Satendra Singh @ Shekhar Ji s/o Late Nagdeo Singh, resident of village-Bairia, P.S. Nabinagar, District-Aurangabad …Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar ...OP ----------- 2/ 29.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 353, 379, 121-A, 122, 124-A of the Indian Penal Code, section 25(1-b)A, 26, 27(II) of the Arms Act and section 17 of the CLA Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and subsequently his name transpired during investigation. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, who is in custody since 06.04.2011 in the present case be released on bail after full verification of the petitioner and his bailors papers on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Rohtas P.S. Case No.58 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and another bailor shall be Jaishri Singh, Samdhi of the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the 2 petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. In view of the antecedents of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Rohtas, within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next one year. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in this period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)