IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Contempt No.216 of 2007 Udayveer Singh Rathi & three ……….. Petitioners Versus State of U.P. and three others ……. Respondents None for the petitioners. Mr. Gopal Narain, Advocate for the respondents. JUDGMENT Per:- Hon’ble J.C.S. RAWAT, J. (Oral) There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Mr. Gopal Narain, Advocate for the respondents. 2. As there is not representation on behalf of the petitioners, I am left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. The petition, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. (J.C.S Rawat, J.) Dated 28.11.2007 vinod