. Mukteshwa; Budek,‘ President, a‘udia ‘Sikshan samiti, Bhkaludi istt.- Mahasamund (C.G.‘) ifx/nA , 2 K gh; D “ ' ‘ 1 PETITIONER Aml Kumar eardia,S/o ‘Shn‘ ' ‘Shn‘ Manmohan Gardia, 'Agedabout‘4’l years, R/oViHage’-' Memra(Vimalpur), Vim-sankarai' Jonk, V" Tahsil & Dism— Mahasamund(C.G.) VERSUS z RESPONDENT 1. State of ~ Chhattisgarh, Though g ‘ Secretary School EducatioDepaliment, HIGH COURI‘ OF CHHMTISGARH :v BILASPUR Wn't Petition (S) No. 4659 of 2007 Petitioner Anil Kumar Gardia Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh 85 another ‘ (Writ Petition Under Article 226 of the Constituu'on of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotd J.) - None for the petitioner. Shn' A. V. Shxidhar, Panel Lawyer for the respondents. 0 R D E R (oral) i ( Passed on this 9‘11 day of March, 20,10 ) The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in prosecuting the matter. In View of the foregoing, the petition is dismissed for want of ' proch'o seun. Sd/- atish K. Agnihotri Judge ‘ S