IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14366 of 2010 DARSHAN YADAV SON OF LATE MAHABIR YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE IATA BANDH, P.S. SIKANDRA, DISTRICT JAMUI Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3 27/04/2011 Petitioner is in custody since 2.12.2008. He is accused in Sikandra (Chandradeep) P.S. Case No. 110/08 under section 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with section 27 of the Arms Act. In view of the submission of the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner that looking at the period the petitioner has spent in custody without any substantial progress in the trial coupled with the fact that the nature of injury caused upon the informant cannot be attributed to the present petitioner because there is no clear evidence of the petitioner having caused injury to Kedar Yadav and that the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and will not abscond or tamper with the evidence nor shall indulge in any criminal activities after release on bail, let petitioner Darshan Yadav be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to - 2 - the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in Sikandra (Chandreadeep) P.S. Case No. 110 of 2008. One of the sureties will be executed by the son of the petitioner who has sworn affidavit before this Court whose name is Bhupendra Yadav and other by an elected representative of the area on due identification. It is further directed that the petitioner will cooperate in trial and shall not indulge in any criminal activities or abscond or tamper with the evidence. Any breach may lead to cancellation of bail granted to him. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)