IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5140 of 2009 BABLU KUMAR @ BABLOO THATHERA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 21/05/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case under Sections- 302/34 of I.P.C., 27 of the Arms Act and 3/4 of D.P. Act. 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act. The defence is that the F.I.R. is against unknown. The only material is the confession of the co- accused. The impugned order from the case diary notices the confession of co-accused Rozin Ahmad who allegedly acknowledged having shot dead the deceased and the petitioner is stated to have then lodged a bomb. This Court finds no reason to take any different view than that in the impugned order that the injuries on the person of the deceased noticed in the post mortem report, corroborated the confession. It is stated that co-accused Rozin Ahmad has been granted regular bail. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of 2 the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merits, including grant of regular bail to co- accused, without being prejudiced by the present order of rejection. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)