CWP(T) No. 14541 of 2008 8.7.2011 Present:- Mr. Rakesh Bharti, counsel for the petitioners. Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General for the respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that present case is covered by judgment dated 6.7.2010 in CWP No. 4459 of 2009 which is as follows:- “Heard and gone through the record. 2. Matter is covered by a judgment of the State Administrative Tribunal, dated 26.7.1993, delivered in OA No./TA No. 543/1996 alongwith TA-554/1986, TA- 324/1986 and TA-320/1986, titled D.R.Chauhan & Others vs. State of H.P. and others, which has attained finality, on account of its having not been challenged in any superior Court, as also by a judgment of this Court delivered on 22.3.2010 in CWP(T) No. 6018/2008, titled Madan Lal Tomar and others vs. State of H.P. and another. 3. Therefore, petition is allowed and it is directed that petitioner shall be granted revised version pre 1996 pay revision scale of Rs.300-600. Order be complied with within three months from today. Writ petition stands disposed of.” In reply, the respondents have taken the stand that judgment rendered in TA No. 543/86 on 26.7.1993 in the case of D.R.Chauhan & others vs. State of H.P. and others was personal measure to the incumbents who were in the Department as on 1.11.1966. The said - 2 - judgment was implemented by issuing notification by the respondents. The said notification was mis-interpreted and mis-read by some of the heads of the institution and pay scale of Rs. 1640- 2925 was granted to the Assistant Librarians w.e.f. 1.1.1986 which in fact was wrong on the part of the heads of institutions. 2. It has been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in the present petition all the petitioners came in service after the year 1996. The question involved is whether the Assistant Librarians who are having one cadre in the State were entitled to Rs.300-600 scale as on 1.1.1966 and revised from time to time. This question has been considered more than once by this Court at least in judgments dated 22.3.2010 in CWP(T) No.6018 of 2008 and on 6.7.2010 in CWP No. 4459 of 2009. 3. The present case is covered by the aforesaid judgments dated 22.3.2010 and 6.7.2010. In these circumstances, the petition is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners shall be granted revised version pre 1996 pay revision scale of Rs.300-600. The compliance be made in three months from the date of supply of copy of this judgment by any of the petitioner to the competent authority. The petition stands disposed of on above terms. July 8, 2011 ( Kuldip Singh ) (GR) Judge