IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.136 of 2006 BASANT KUMAR CHOUDHARY, S/o Late Jitendra Kumar Choudhary, R/o Mohalla-Lichi Bagan, S.K. Tarafdar Road, Adampur, P.S.-Barari, Town and District- Bhagalpur. Versus 1. The Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, through its Registrar. 2. The Vice-Chancellor, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 3. The Registrar, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 4. The Finance Officer, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 5. The head of the University, Department of Physics, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 6. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 7. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 8. The Director, Department of Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. For the petitioner : Mr. Purushottam Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Raj Kamal, AC to SC-XX. ----------- 3. 06-08-2010 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. 2. This petition has been filed for reviewing order dated 23-02-2006 by which a Bench of this Court disposed of C.W.J.C. NO. 4317 of 2000 with a direction to the petitioner to represent his case before the Vice-Chancellor, Tilkamanjhi University for payment of his due salary on regular basis for the post of Library Assistant and in case any such representation is filed by the petitioner the same shall be examined and disposed of by speaking order by said Vice- Chancellor in accordance with law and in case the Vice- Chancellor is satisfied that the petitioner was transferred - 2 - against a sanctioned scale in P.G. Department of Political Science on regular basis, he will pass necessary orders for payment of due salary to the petitioner forthwith thereafter. This exercise, however, was to be completed by the authority concerned within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of the representation. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that at the time of disposing of the said writ petition, interlocutory application bearing I.A. NO. 4595/05 was not considered by which additional reliefs; to sanction earned leave and to quash office order regarding subsistence and regular current salary, were sought. 4. However, from a bare perusal of the order under review, it is quite apparent that only the relief sought in the writ petition was pressed and the relief sought in the said interlocutory application was not pressed. In the said circumstances, the said order was passed. 5. This court does not find any error apparent on the face of record nor does it find any material to take a different view. Accordingly, this review petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to raise all those points for which reliefs were sought in the I.A. NO. 4595/2005 or for any other relief before the Vice-Chancellor of the aforesaid University, who will decide the same expeditiously. Sujit (S.N. Hussain, J)