IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH MARCH 2007 / 23RD PHALGUNA 1928 WP(C).No. 30564 of 2006(L) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- JIJIMON K.T., KOTTANADAN HOUSE, MADAVANA, PANANGAD P.O., ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.N.R.CHANDRASEKHARAN SRI.T.H.CHACKO RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE MINISTER FOR LABOUR DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE MANAGER, ACCILERATED FREEZE DRYING COMPANY LIMITED, EZHUPUNNA P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BENJAMIN PAUL for R1 & R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC.NO.30564/2006 L APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE EXPLANATION (OBJECTION) DTD. 04/07/2003 OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD SIGNED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 25/07/2003 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 30/07/2003 OF THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD SIGNED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 2/08/2003. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT (REPRESENTATION) DTD. 10/09/2003 OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P7: COPY OF THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD SIGNED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 11/09/2003. EXT.P8: COPY OF THE CONCILIATION NOTICE DTD. 06/10/2003 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P9: COPY OF THE CONCILIATION NOTICE DTD. 27/11/2003 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P10: COPY OF THE CONCILIATION NOTICE DTD. 31/12/2003 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. /TRUE COPY/ KSS THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No. 30564 OF 2006-L = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 14th day of March, 2007. JUDGMENT Heard. 2. The first respondent is directed to convene a conciliation between the petitioner and the third respondent and if that does not fructify, immediate necessary action in terms of the Industrial Disputes Act shall be taken and communicated to the Government for further action in that regard. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/-