IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13775 of 2009 DILCHAND PRASAD YADAV, SON OF LATE CHANDRIKA PRASAD YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – KOT NARHAWA, P.S. GOPALPUR, DISTRICT - GOPALGANJ Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL OF BIHAR, VIR CHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA 3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, RURAL WORKS DEPARTMENT, BIHAR PATNA 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, RURAL WORKS DEPARTMENT BIHAR PATNA 5. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, WORKS CIRCLE -2, PATNA 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RURAL WORKS DEPARTMENT, DIVISION -2 HILSA, RURAL WORKS DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 7. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, PATNA. 8. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, BIHAR SHARIF, NALANDA ----------- 02. 26.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to payment of retiral dues as indicated in paragraph 1 of the writ application. Leaned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing the writ application, the retiral dues towards provident fund and the amount equivalent to the unutilized leave have been paid, however, for rest of the retiral dues, he proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.4 enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of such claim along with certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks from today. In case such representation is filed, the respondent no. 4 shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the pending claims of the petitioner could be settled without delay. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)