^LEBEWa ILV1G& (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION(S)NO. (2-0 /20W-0/ PETITIONER :^ yb Rudra Narayan Prasad Sinha ^ S/o Shri R. P. Sinha ^jf2)^'^:- ..-• Aged about 46 years, W^y' .^ .^"",,^:'11 ..•••' <^'J^ ../ <r-^"' RESPONDENTS Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Malviya Nagar, Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State Government of Chhattisgarh Through :- Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ,;^2. The Director, Public Instruction Department Through - Director, Directorate, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer Durg (C.G.) ^" WRIT PETITIQN UNDERARTICLE 226/^7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .1 1-1 -i-^t •«•(- Q F. n 1-1 cL^t-__*_ HI6H COURT OF CHHATTtSSARH AT BILASPUR W. P. fS) No. 120 <rf 2007 Petitioner : Rudru Narayan Prasad 5inho Versus Respondents : State ©overnmentof Chhattisgarh cmd others SB: Hon'bleMr. Justice Sutish K. Agmhotri. J Siri J.N. Nkmde, Advocate for Ihe petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Sovemment Advoca-te for the respondents/State. OR&ER (Pasaed on 16th day of January, 2007) The followin9 order of -the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri. J. 1. Leamed counsel o^pearing for -the petitioner as well as leamed Panel Lawyer oypearing for •the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts of the present case ape simitar to that of in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006 (Sushil Tiwori & others Vs. State 6ovt. of Chhatt-isyirh & others), which wos allowed vide ordar dated 7t November, 2006. They further submit that the question of law involved is also the same. 2. In view of the above stated submissions made by fearned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order dated 7tt November, 2006 j»ssadby -this Court in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006. No order as to costs. gablu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge