CWP No.1803 of 2008. 30.10.2008. Present: Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Ajay Kumar and Mr. Rishi Aggarwal, Advocates, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Baldev Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. M/s Sanjeev Bhushan, Virender Thakur and Raj Kumar Negi, Advocates, for respondent No.4. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 7th July, 2008 contained in Annexure P-17 of this writ petition, whereby respondent No.1 has decided to call for fresh bids in respect of Jangi-Thopan-Powari Hydro Electric Project. From the perusal of the impugned order, it is apparent that show cause notice has already been issued to M/s Brakel Corporation N.V. as to why the allotment should not be cancelled for mis-representing and giving wrong facts to the State Government. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The decision on the reply to the show cause notice to opposite party No.4 is still pending with the State Government. The interest of justice will suffice if final decision is taken by the State Government expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks. In light of the above, we are of the opinion that at this stage, the petition is premature. Therefore, we grant liberty to the petitioner to challenge any order passed by the State Government in this connection, including condition No.(ii) of impugned order dated 7th July, 2008 contained in Anneuxre P-17 of this writ petition, if it prevails. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. 30th October, 2008. (Rajiv Sharma), J. (tr)