1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1853 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 320 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra and another ...Applicants Versus Umar Khan s/o Usman Khan Pathan ...Respondent ..... Mr. N.N. Jadhav, A.P.P. for applicants Mr. A.B. Gaikwad, advocate for the respondent ..... CORAM: S.B. DESHMUKH & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATED: 17TH JUNE, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 We heard learned A.P.P. for the applicants. We have seen the order passed by this Court on 3.5.2010. We have also heard learned counsel Mr. A.B. Gaikwad, for the respondent in this criminal application. 2 In view of the statement made in this application and the affidavit in reply on behalf of the Superintendent of Police, filed on the 2 same day i.e. on 3.5.2010, we are inclined to allow this application recalling the order passed by us on 3.5.2010 imposing costs of Rs. 500/-. Learned A.P.P. makes a statement that in view of the said order, an amount of Rs.500/- is deposited in this court on 3.5.2010. Statement made is accepted and taken on record. 3 Criminal application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “B” and disposed of. Registry is directed to refund an amount of Rs.500/- to Mr. Subhash Hiraman Mohekar, the then Additional Superintendent of Police, Jalna, who is respondent No.1 in writ petition No. 320 of 2010. 4 Application accordingly stands allowed and disposed of. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) (S.B. DESHMUKH, J.) rlj/