IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14412 of 2009 1. RAMESH SINGH 2. BANSHU SINGH -------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 6.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The allegation is regarding demolishing informant’s wall and laying bricks and in that continuation while objection was raised on behalf of the informant, it is said that accused persons including the petitioners obtained informant’s signature over a blank paper and abused in name of his caste chamar. Admittedly there is dispute in between the parties, cause of accusation is collective benefit of villagers while that of the informant’s individual. He could not get relief from any corner though he approached all the relevant authorities and in that continuation this allegation is levelled. Witnesses are there also stating the differences and quarrel but on the relevant point they are stating only jatibodhak gali without specifying caste or abuse. If that is so to humiliate the informant, so I find - 2 - ingredient lacking for S.C./S.T. to refuse petitioners’ prayer for anticipatory bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named two petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua in SC/ST (Rohtas) Dehri P.S.Case No. 50/2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI