IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 221 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1341 of 2005 Mahesh N. Shah .. Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents And Hasmukh C. Sanghavi .. Proposed Respondents ... Mr.C.P. Deogirikar for the petitioner in support. Ms.Mamta Sadh AGP for respodnent nos.1, 4 and 5. Ms.Shakuntala Mudbidri for respondent no.2 Hasmukh C. Sanghavi, Proposed respondent present in person. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 11th July 2006. DATED : 11th July 2006. DATED : 11th July 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent no.3, learned AGP for respondent nos,1, 4 and 5 and the proposed respondent. 2. Counsel for the respondents have no objection for joining as the proposed respondent as a party. Proposed respondent is present in person states that his father had sold a flat to the petitioner and he has nothing more to say. Since he is the heir of his father, it would be appropriate to join him as a party. 3. Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment shall be carried out within a period of one week. (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J)