smLE “am“ @ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (st NE. WW /2009 PETITIONER Balram Suryavanshi S/o Late Dev Singh,Aged about 4O year, Assitant Village Panchayat Officer, Village Panchayat Kareli (Chhoti) Janpad Panchayat Magarlod, Distt.—Dhamtari (C.G.) :LIJ 1 y*yla VEEESHS RESPONDENTS /1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Panchayat and Village Development Department Mantrayalay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Rajpur, (C.G.) /2. Collecmr, Dhamtari Distt.— Dhamtari (C.G.) Chief Excutive Officer Janp'ad Panchayat Magarlod Distt.— Dhamtari /(C.G.)_ WRIT PETITION UNIEER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . / . w.\0($)N04W9WZOOj Wm (W) mwfa‘w wmm WWW WW wm *aif‘anm 4mm am mama?! ImiWfE—-~!JS/95~1 1 / 2anx~1 .on‘oca. ' SB: Hon. Mr. Justice Pri inker Diwaker 13.08.2009: Shi’i Arun Shukla, counself r the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh Tha ur, Deputy. Advocate General for , the respondents!State. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 30.6.2009 passed by respondent No.1 by hich the petitioner who is working has been transferred from Janpad hamtari to Janpad Pancyayat, Farasgaon District Bastar, on ad inistrative ground. Contention of the couns l for the petitioner is that the petitioner is a Panchayat Se retary and the seniority .~of the Panchayat Secretary is maintain d district wise. He further submits that if the petitioner is forced to o and join in the transferred place, his seniority would be adversely ffected. Counsel for the respon ants/State submits that let the petitioner make a suitable r presentation to the authorities concerned which would be decid d in accordance with law. To this proposition of the State counseli counsel for the petitioner showed his agreement. However, he pra‘ys for an interim protection till the as Panchayat Secretary Panchayat Magarlod, District representation of the/ petitione‘ is decided by the authorities , concerned. Accordingly, the petition isldisposed of with a direction that if " the petitioner makes a represen ation to the authorities concerned l l we“ r. t m. w. we wt a“../..‘..’.mW‘.,Mo-...“hwmvauaeww‘. await? Mia {gram 1m: ’aTria—zrsmsa—I 1 /2l;o;;~1 ,mwoo. m§wWV£§J4M79 . %200 mam (Wu) mwm 7 V xv wwwx§ww %W m ¥ ’within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the authorities concerned shall decide the same within a further period of three weeks from‘the date of its receipt. Till then the order impugned shall be in apeyance kept so far as it relates to the petitioner. Sd/_ ff Pritinker Diwaker t ‘ Judge J70