ILE ~._-'; [er13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTiSGARH Wrjt Petition (S) No. ^ 35^ of 2006 PETITIONER: .t>-..:\^ !.-'''l •, i?. ,%T ^CL- ^yy ..••'. ^'yt^.-- p-"^^" ^-.»?"'fi r.-' ^^" ^-- H.R. Mandavj, S/oAkturam Mandavi, Aged about 46 years, Assistant Director, Education, Department of Tribal Welfare, Durg, Tehsil & District: Durg, Chhattisgarh. o's1 - Versus - RESPQNDENTS: ^ r State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Commissioner, Scheduted Castes and Scheduled Tribes Weifare Department, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, Patratoli, ,/, District: Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. ^' •fl?^f^+dn+ Ccmmilsion^r Tr;t>al kltl-f-a'sy Durg ,(et.t-at+isga^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226-0F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS. DIRECTIONS ETC.. IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ^. HI6H COURT OF CHHATTTSe^RH AT BILAS'UR Wnt Petition f5) No. 6994 of 2006 H.R. Moindnvi Versus s State of Chhattisaarh A others \ \-.... Present; ^iri Sanjoy K. Agrawal, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Pane! Lawyer for the respondents/State. OR&ER :th (Passed on 15T" day of December, 2006) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner- was posted as Assistant Director in the office of the Assistant Commissioner, Triba! Vi/elfare ESepartment at t)urg (C.6.). By impugned order dated 7.7.2006 (Annexure P/2), the petitioner has been transferred to Jashpur as Principat, ©oyernment Higher Secondary School, Patratoii, District Jashpur. Learned counsel further submits that wife of the petitioner is pos+ed as Postal Assistnnt in the Department of Posts, Durg (C.6.5. 1 2. The petitioner wants to make a representation before 1+ie respondents-authorities for accommodating -the petitioner at Durg or at nearby ptaces. 3. In the event, any representation is made by the petitioner, the respondents-autiiorities may consider tiie same sympathetically in accordonce with law. Subhash 4. Thus, this writ petition stouids disposed of with the above-stated liberty. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge