Crl. Misc. No.M-10941 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-10941 of 2011 Date of Decision: 08.04.2011 Sat Pal ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Mandeep Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of direction to respondents No.2 to 4 not to interfere into the peaceful possession of the petitioner as a tenant in shop situated at City Road Batala, District Gurdaspur at the behest of respondents No.5 and 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner had filed a suit for permanent injunction, in which, the SHO Tejinder Singh of Police Station City Batala made a statement that he has no connection with the suit property and he will not interfere in the possession of plaintiff Satpal i.e the present petitioner. Accordingly, the said suit was dismissed as withdrawn. Thereafter, new SHO, namely, Narinder Singh was posted in place of Tejinder Singh who also started interfering in the peaceful possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has also filed the contempt petition in the Court of Civil Judge, Batala, which is pending. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he Crl. Misc. No.M-10941 of 2011 2 may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail the remedy under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C in view of the ratio of judgment rendered in the case titled as Sakiri Vasu vs. State of U.P. and others reported as 2008(2) Supreme Court Cases 409. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail of the alternative remedy in accordance with law. Disposed of as above. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 08.04.2011 JUDGE gurpreet