AB 1899/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. MERUNO Heard Ms. P. Bhattacherjee, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr . B.S. Sinha, learned Addl. P.P. appearing on behalf of the State of Assam. The petitioner, who apprehending arrest in connection with Sarupathar P. S. Case No. 30/2011 corresponding to GR Case No.98/2011 under Section 498 (A) IP C, has moved this application for granting pre-arrest bail under the provision o f Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. As directed by this Court the learned Addl. P.P. has produced the releva nt case diary of the Case. In paragraph 5 of the application, averments have bee n made that the other co-accused persons (husband, son & daughter) in the said c ase have been subsequently released on bail, which statement has not been disput ed by the learned Addl. P.P. However, according to the learned Addl. P.P, the c ase diary reveals that there are internal fighting in the family. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the parties, on perusal of the case diary, considering the age of the old lady of 60 years and also the averments made in paragraph 5 of the application that the other co-accused perso ns have already been enlarged on bail, I am of the considered view that the peti tioner, namely, Smti Guneswari Saikia, in connection with the aforesaid case, sh all be entitled for the privilege of pre-arrest bail. In this view of the matter, the interim bail granted to the petitioner b y this Court on 29-06-2011 is hereby made absolute with further direction that t he I.O. of the case may impose the terms and conditions as deem fit and proper. With the above direction, this anticipatory bail application stands disp osed of.