IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2010 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3735 of 2010() ------------------------------------ CMP.7827/2009 IN M.C.249/2009 OF MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT, PARAVUR. .................... REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/ACCUSED -------------------------------------------------------- AJIKUMAR, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.RAVEENDRAN NAIR, RESIDING AT THENGUVILA VEEDU, KILIMANNOOR VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT & STATE ------------------------------------------------- 1. SREEJA KURUP, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.VASANTHA KUMARI AMMA, RESIDING AT 'VAISHNAVI', THENGUVILA CHERI, POLACHIRA.P.O., NEDUNGOLAM, PARAVOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT – 691 334. 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADVS. SRI.S.SANTHOSH KUMAR SMT.P.LISSY JOSE. R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.SABU SREEDHARAN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ V.RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.R.P.No.3735 of 2010 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 9 th day of December, 2010 O R D E R When this Revision came up for hearing, after service of summons, the learned counsel for the 1st respondent/applicant submitted that the impugned order is appealable under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The above objection is well taken. The remedy of the petitioner is not a revision before this Court but an appeal before the Sessions Court under Section 29 of the said Act. Accordingly this petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedies before the appropriate Forum. Dated this the 9 th day of December, 2010. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. sj