/< ^^••^^•^^'^ ^B.^^^:';;^.V^ pves^te(iAV'^ ''0.5--"'"" d.—a'3 &z\.eQ- IN THB HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATtlSGARH AT BHASPUR W.P.NO. "M^ / 2005 VERSUS RESPQNDENTS: PETITIONER : /'William Ekka S/o Shri Franshis Ekka, Aged about 43 years, Working as Registry Clerk (R.M.) Sub-Registry Office, Dharamjaigarh R/o Village.& Post - Singibahar Tah.-Kunkuri Distt. Jashpurnagar VERSUS State of C.G., Through The Secretary, Ministry of Revenue, Dou Kalyan Singh Bhavan Raipur Chhattisgarh Inspector General Registrar Raipur (C.G.) Collector (Registry Branch) Raigarh (C.G.) Shri Mirja Ashlam Begh Senior Division Registry Clerk Sub Division Office Gharghora (C.G.) y. _^ _<:'. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / ' / 4. ./" _D-^ 4- l* + a- XI-HC-78 ni*ioi ^*nq» \dw| 'rqiqio'q, t?TTlx-l<l<»,tqoi^^ tO.iP.YAo. 'ZS'^'S'/o^' ^ 3n^?Tq?rRrii<p ^CT^yi^^TSPWP \. - ^TlA&Jb---^ '^r i>J- ^ 3TI^9Tq^I»(^c|i^6|<;) W^200 ^TTW^rit^ 3H^?T <pi<<Tcot<ln»i4ii<ic>T^'I^l<l ^Ri\<i^ ^3rf^T3n^5T Shri P. S. Kosh^ Respondents No. 1 to 3. Leamed counsel petitioner is workiag 7.9.2005 Shn B. K. Chakra()arty, counsel for the petitioner. , Deputy Advocate General for fhe [for fhe petitioner subndts fhat the as Registiy Clerk, he bas been Dharaijaigarh, Distdct-| transferred i&'oni fh^ office of fhe Sub-Registrar, Ra^arh to the office of the Sub- Registrar, Gharghoda, 4istdct- Raigarh. The petitioner relies on the circular No. F-1-V2002/ 1/6 dated 18.10.2004. Leamed Depuly 4dvocate General, on fhe ofher hand, submits fhat it is not alcase of traasfer but vide order dated 26.7.2005 passed by jthe CoUector, Rajgarh, aa iateraal arraagenient is niade ^yifhin fhe District, under fhe sanie CoUectorate^ as such, ti|ie petitioner will not be prejudiced if he works ia fh.e sarfie district io. ofher office of fhe Sub-Registrar. Leamed counsel l^r fhe petitioner has not poiated out aay maUce or violatio4 of rules or regulations ia laakmg mteraal adjustment oj\ allotment of fhe work wifhin fhe district by fhe CoUector. | In view offhe fore^omg, fhere is no merit m fhe petition, which is Uable to be, an(|. is accordingly, dismissed. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge