|tiacl|na "'ji lt)!'rt-.-7tX8: MIGHCOURTOFCHMATTKGARHATBILASPUR DIVISION BENCH Coram HON'BLE SHRlR&(^ GWTA, CJ. & ITON'BLE SHRI SUBMt. KUMAR SU , J. PETmONERS RESPONDENTS MCC N0,24 of 2004 Mohd. Halim and another Versus Unton of India arU 4 sthCTs. OFFICEREFEREhKiE Present: Shri NK Agrawal, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORDER (17B'October,2008) The following order of the Court wss paased by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: The respondenta in WP No.2(»/20Q1, vWie order (tated 11.02.2003, Nierel^thevmtpeffiionwasdismis^ were directedt6submitteportby28.02.20C@. 2) This petition w^s registered as MCO N0.24/120)4 after the receipt of the report by the respondente in compliance of the order dated 11.02.20)3 passedinWPNo.209/aX)1. j 3) The feportsubmitted bythe respondents bej plaeed in the records of WF> No.209/2001. 4) of. With the above direction, MCC No.240004 stjands dispo^d Sd/- ; cauef Justtce Sd/— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge if" ^^ss!^ s •H? iia ^l