THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No.1037 of 2003 Dated: 08-02-2008 Between : Ch. Srinivasa Reddy … Petitioner/s And Government of India, Ministry of Defence, Rep. by its General Manager, Ordinance Factory Project, Yedumailaram (Post), Medak District and 3 others. … Respondent/s THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R. VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No.1037 of 2003 ORAL ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R.Varma) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Assistant Solicitor General and also the learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, appearing for the respondents. 2. This Writ of Certiorari is filed seeking to quash the order, dated 12.02.2002, in O.A.No.1110 of 2001, passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for brevity ‘the Tribunal’), and consequently direct the first respondent to issue appointment orders to the post of Fitter or Forger or Heat Treater under Land Displaced Persons quota. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that he was the dependant son of the land owner, whose land has been acquired in 1985, and hence he is entitled for appointment under “Land Displaced Persons Scheme”. It appears, he passed Apprenticeship in ITI in the Trade of Fitter and Trade of Forger and Heat Treater. But, he was not considered for appointment. Therefore, he filed the present application O.A.No.1110 of 2001, seeking appointment under the above said scheme. 4. The Tribunal, having found that earlier similar application in O.A.No.314 of 1999 had been filed by the petitioner, which was disposed of by the Tribunal with a direction to place his name in the Live Register and consider his case whenever vacancies arise, through the impugned order, dated 12-10-2001, disposed of the impugned O.A., to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on daily wages if he seeks appointment on daily wages. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. 5. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequent to the order passed by the Tribunal, on several occasions appointments were made, as and when vacancies arose, but his case was not considered. 6. But, no proof, whatsoever, as contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner as regards the availability of vacancies, has been placed before the Tribunal as well as this Court. Therefore, the statement made by the learned counsel cannot be relied on. 7. However, since the order of the Tribunal, dated 31-05-1999, said to have been passed in O.A.No.314 of 1999, still holds good, we only hope that the case of the petitioner will be considered for appointment to a suitable post, in future as and when vacancies arise. 8. In the result, with the above observations, the writ petition is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA _______________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 08-02-2008 Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No.1037 of 2003 08-02-2008 (Msr)