^ IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JTTOICATURE AT BI&ASPUR (C.G.). PETITIONER WRIT PETrTION N0 OF, 200 2. Sumer Bai» W/o. Shri Kishan» Kausbikt age'd about years» Sarpanch» -Gram Eanchayat, Nirdh4.». Teh. Pa-li, Dis-tt, Korba, (Chhattisgarh). V E R S U S RESPONCEIiaF^ ^IS^ ^f^ ^^^ 1. State o£ chhattisgarh .1 c^^^w^^^^^^ 2. Adelitional commissiorier,' Bl.IagBta','; {'v l-^o^ 3. Shantj. Das j, S/o. M. DasManlkiauicJi.» Viilage D'hama. Post Pall, Distt. Korba, (chhattisgalsN'. ^" ^^^^y" • ^y* ^~\ '<<F'^"'' ^a- ^ ! ;_____ ^:-^^^-^-^.":^^—,^ WRIT EETSTlON USDE'R-ftEg?;I;e!iE: 226 & 227 CE ,:THE CO t,®I :IO .O^E:lN@Xft{ll?:';-.':' ' ^: • : i lll-JI HIGHCQURTQFCHI-li<\T7nS<3AKH:BILASPUR PETITIQNER WRITF»ETITIQNJN0.1324©F20<32 Sumer Bai RESPQNDENTS Versus StateOfChhattisgarh&Others ashok (Writ Petition underArticle 226 & 227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : 1-ion'ble Shri Satish K.Agnitiotri, J. Present:- Ms Sllarmila Singhai, AdvQGate for the petitioner, SliriN.N. Roy, Pariel LaWyerfor the State. Ms Anju Ahuja, Advocateforthe respondent No.3. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 6th dayofJuly,2Q10) 1) Learned couhsel appearing for the petitioner submits thiat; despite repeated Communications to the petitioner, she has not received any instruction, thus learned counsel pleads no instructions. The pefitioner may not be ihterested in pursuing the matter. 2) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Satish K. Aghihotri Judge