THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 356 of 2009 Lakhan Singh S/o Jayram Singh …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ..…. Respondents Mr. G.C. Lakhchaura, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A .for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. G.C. Lakhchaura, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. 2. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; contents of the F.I.R.; averments made in the F.I.R.; the fact that the F.I.R. discloses prima-facie cognizable offence; and in the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find that the petitioner is entitled to get the reliefs claimed in the writ petition. 3. I am refraining from commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioner’s case at the trial, which is yet to start. 4. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed in limine. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 28.04.2009 Shiv 2