8Mra3 E SiS^P' 8Ft46S.il- W..y.M' INTimHIGH COURT OF JUDK^TUSB AT BILASFUR fCHHATTISGARKI WRIT PETITION N0.5^^ QF20U6 PETITIONER Veer Narayan Verma s/'o Shri Venna, Assistaiit 'l'eacJ-ier, Uovt. IMaveen Pninary School, Tekai-i, P.0. Girodh, TehsU-Dharsiwan, District - Ralpiu (CG). VE R SU S RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretaiy, General , Adininistration Departinent, (^ Govemment of Chhattisearh, D.K.S. Bhawaii, Raipur (CG). \^^> ^^' .^^^ 9^y ^^'. '^- ^QNIM/^ ',>~^€ / /—\'^ <^ •'v^1 ttie Secfetaiy, School Education Departinent, Govemment of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawaii, Raipiu (C.G.). /3. Director, PubUc Instructions, Rsdpiu fC.G.J ^4. Shri Ajay Chandrakar, Prabhafi Matiti'i, Paiichayat & Gramin Vikas, Raipur (C.G.). , 5. CoUector, Raipur (CG). 'D/sy. ^/pui^vr~ 6. Dr. Snat. R. BambarR District Education Officer, Raipmr (CG). 7. Block Education Officer, Dharsiwaii, Disti-ict Ralpur WRtT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORAJRI. MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR QRDER^: 3SsB3sSSKi^^S@^^si.fe^:gs^^5s^^Si^^^^igasiaSg^^i^Si'sie?eBjlBBsBi XI-HC-78 *nN^iraiNiqi 3^ •<<l<<ld<<, t9Tn<-l'l6, (sK'll'Hy ..^plf^.....n>iP.1.^2o^ Sli^i ^acn (yit^sx^ir) 3I1^T?iTR-fi»b cRTanSsishHiti A t- ^aTWtriN'sn^T Govemrrlent 21-7-2006:- Heard Shri Dinesh R.K. Tiwati, Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Advocate for the advanoe copy. By the instant petition, the peti( idated 7-7-2006 whereby the petition|E IDharsiwan to Bhothali, Aarang. This df ground that the petitioner has been i the transfer of the petitioner, become teacheriess. In the circumstances, leamed petitioner may be allcwed to make a and he be directed to decide the same, has no objection. Having heard learned counsel and circumstances of the case, and ofthe case, the prayer made by |reasonable. Therefore, the petition^r |representation along with a copy of Wf !respondent No.1 within aperiod of 10 No.1 shatl decide the representation wi1| receipt of the representation, in an points raised by the petitioner, in However, the effect and operatio(i petitioner shall remain stayed, tilt the With the direction aforesaid, the Consequentiy, M.(W.)P. No.27|: 6990/2006 stand disposed of. iti, counset for the petittoner and Shri ^tate/respondents No.1, 2, 3, 5 and 7, on (ioner has questioned hte transfer order ;r has been transferred from Tekari, o|rder has been challenged mainly on the trarlsferred four times in five years and after mrr|ent Naveen Primary School, Tekari witl accordbrce +l*ltd'i(1-1 iTTOTt'irte^t <Rl^K ^aif^Tsn^r learned counset col.msel for the petitioner submitted thert the de|tailed represertation to respondent .No.1 (o which tearned counsel for respondents fitir the parties, having regard to fhe fac^s wittuaut expressing any opnion on the merit for the petitioner is just, fatr and is allowed to mato a detaited |s petition raising all his grievances to itiays from today and in tum, respondent l|hin a period of 30 days frwn the date of objective manner, after considerirg atl the with law. ofthe tmpugned oider in respect ofthe rertresentation ofthe petitioner is deeided. ()etition starxls disposed of. 125C006, I.A. NCS.6991C006 and Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge fev^l ^•w<" SSess^ 'SK^s, ^SwS,