FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1726 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 29 OF 1997 [ Sudhabai Gangadha Mogal V/S. Shrin Shalivahan Ranchoddas ] ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : Court’s or Judge’s orders orders : ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Mr. Kanetkar, adv.for the applicant. Mr. Ameya Tamhankar h/f. Smt. Seema Sarnaik, adv.for respondents no.1A & 1B. Mr.Amogh Karandikar i/by. Khandeparkar & Associates, adv.for respondents no.3 & 4. CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED : 1st APRIL, 2010. PC :- 1. Perused the precipe for speaking to the minutes. Mr. Kanetkar, learned counsel for the applicant, points out that, there is an error in describing the prayer in the order dated 22nd April, 2009. The Civil Application which was allowed by the order was in terms of prayer clause (a), but, the order erroneously describes the prayer as `prayer clause (c)’. The correction to be carried out in the order and the order be read accordingly. [SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J]