HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMA MOHANA RAO W.A.No.830 of 2011 JUDGMENT (Per Sri Ghulam Mohammed, ACJ) Respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein filed W.P.No.25790 of 2011 questioning the action of respondent Nos.3 to 11 herein in granting construction permission for establishing a Saw Mill and proceeding with the operations of the said Mill by the appellant in Sy.No.345/2(B) of Parimpidi Village, Koyyalagudem Mandal, West Godavari District, without considering the objections filed by them. By order dated 15.09.2011, the learned Judge of this Court disposed of the said writ petition with a direction to respondent No.11- Divisional Forest Officer to consider the application of the appellant, which is stated to be pending before him, by taking account the objections raised by respondent Nos.1 and 2. Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant filed the present writ appeal. 2. Heard both sides. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant contended that the learned Judge without affording any notice and opportunity of hearing to the appellant, disposed of the writ petition at the stage of admission. 4. We have perused the order impugned. Inasmuch as the application of the appellant is stated to be pending, the learned Judge has safeguarded the interest of both the parties by directing respondent No.11 to consider the objections raised by respondent Nos.1 and 2 before taking decision on the said application. However, as it is stated that till now, the application of the appellant is not yet disposed of, we direct respondent No.11 to dispose of the application of the appellant, as expeditiously as possible, after giving an opportunity to both sides, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to the above direction, the Writ Appeal is disposed of. No order as to costs. _________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, ACJ _________________________ NOOTY RAMA MOHANA RAO, J Date:27.10.2011 sj