IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1757 of 2009 MD. RAFI @ GUDDU Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 16.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This revision application is preferred against the order dated 27.8.2009 passed in Misc.Case no. 5/09 by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalapur directing the petitioner to make payment of Rs. 4,000/- per month as maintenance to opposite party no.2. Further the authority of the petitioner under whom he is working, has been directed to deduct the amount of Rs. 4,000/- per month from his salary and to deposit in the account of opposite party no.2. In the case, marriage is admitted. At present the wife is not residing with this petitioner. He is willing to keep her while the wife is also willing to accompany him. Only a meager amount is awarded as interim maintenance, so there is no substance in the argument of learned counsel to issue notice to the wife for reconciliation because of the reason that the case is pending before the Family Court, Bhagalpur which is meant for taking every attempt to reconcile the differences. Accordingly, no interference is required in the impugned order dated 27.8.2009. The revision application is dismissed at its admission stage. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)