IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1443 of 2011 DHANANJAY MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 13.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is husband in the case. There is allegation of torture for demand of dowry and keeping complainant’s all ornaments. Submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is that in the whole complaint petition one’s petitioner has been alleged for making demand that also at the occasion of marriage having no occasion of giving torture. Thereafter, there is no allegation against him about making of demand or causing of cruelty rather he resides at Gujerat for his livelihood. Complainant was earlier married with one Pramod Mahto and without divorce she is married with this petitioner, which is a crux of differences and only to cast pressure this case is lodged. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Complaint Case No. 2042 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)