"%*;*»a s- »0| ^fcSsJCI IN THE HIGH COURTQF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (SVNo. cf ^~7 /2007(S.B.1 PETITIONER : 3^^^ -••^^y ' ^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1 r*0^f' '•^•^ o- y p>' Q; Neharu Lal Yadav S^a^hri Ghutoo Yadav Aged about 52 years, Asst. Teacher, R/o Village -Kandolo Post- Bonda Via- Sariya, Tah.- Sarangarli, Dist: Raigarh-(C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through.: Secretary School Education Departm.ent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Of&cer 'Raigarh, Brat : Raigarfa-(C.G.) Block Education Officer Block - Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HISHCOURTOF^IM^rFISSARHATBILASPUR W. P.{Sy No. 907 of 2007 Petitioner Neharu Lal Yadav Verais Kespondents : 5'hate of Chhatt-isgarh and o-thers SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sfftish K. Agnihotri. J Present: Mr. VineetKumar Pcaidey,Advocate for Ihe petitioner. Mr. Ajay &wivedi, Pomel lawyer for the re^iondents/Stnte. OR&ER yasspd ori ihis 15th boy of f:ebruary,2007) 1. The petitioner w<xs appointedon 14.11.1979 asAssistont Teacher on fixied poy scate of Rs. 150 for twoyears, theraifter, Rs. 2(X)/- fixed for third year. After comptetion of three years probation, he was granted regular pay scate of Rs. 169-300/-. 2. Learned counsel o^pearing for 1+ie petitioner submits that the issue involved in Ifte case is asto whether Ihe petitioner is entitled to regulor pay scate w.e.f. the date of initiat c^pointment or aft'er completionof probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by •the Madhya Pradedi State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in'O.A. No. 2745/89 (ttadhukont Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others), wheFein it was held +hat the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular poy scale w.e.f.the date of initiat appointment. The matter was taken-up to the Hon'bte SJpremeCourt in ^secial Leave Petition "~^ (Civil) No. 6892/93. Tliesaidpetition was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of Ihe Tribunal to the effect .^ that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from dateof initial cppointment. 4. Leamed counsel c^pearing for the petitioner further submits that this Court-, while considering the Stxme iSsue in Aeman Jain Vs. The State Sovemment of Chhatt-i^arh & another (W.P. No. 1463 of 2006)by order ckited 10,11.2006,has gronted reguku- poy scate w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. 5. Leamed counsel oppecu'ing for the parties jointly submit that this case is sqyarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Aemcm Jain Vs. The State Sovemment of Chhatt'isgarh & ano+her (Supra). 6. In view of that, this petition is disposed of in the same terms. No order as to costs. Bablu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge