IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3684 of 2009 Between: N.Saibabu S/o.Rama Swamy, Near Ganganamma temple,Singh Nagar Vijayawada,Krishna District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of AP., rep. by its Principal Secretary (Home) Secretariat buildings, Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada Krishna District 3 The Station House officer, Nunna Rural Police Station Vijayawada 4 Mr.Satyanarayana, Sub Inspector of Police, Nunna Rural Police Station, Vijayawada 5 Ch.Ramireddy Son of not known to the petitioner, R/o.Near Ganganamma Temple Singh Nagar, Vijayawada .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the official respondent authorities in detaining and threatening the petitioner without any valid reason as illegal, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the official respondents not to harass the petitioner Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.S.MURTHY Counsel for Respondents 1 to 4: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No: 3684 of 2009 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the official respondent authorities in detaining and threatening the petitioner without any valid reason as illegal, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the official respondents not to harass the petitioner.” At hearing Sri K.S. Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing his case. In view of this submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as not pressed, WPMP.No.4797 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed. ____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J. 9th June, 2009 lmv/es THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No: 3684 of 2009 9th June, 2009 lmv/es