IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.972 of 2010 RAKESH KUMAR, son of Satya Narayan Singh, resident of Gohpur Hajarahia, P.S. Maharajganj, District Siwan … Petitioner Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA through the Secretary cum D.G., Department of Posts, Dak Bhawan, New Delhi 2. The Chief Postmaster General, Bihar Circle, Patna 3. The Vigilance Officer, O/o The Chief Postmaster General, Bihar Circle, Patna 4. The Post Master General, Northern Region, Muzaffarpur 5. The Superintendent of Post Offices, Siwan Division, Siwan 6. The Inspector of Post, Siwan East, Maharajganj, Siwan 7. Shivendra Kumar Pandey, Son of Sri Upendra Nath Pandey, resident of village Chatia Tola, Jai Chapra, P.O. Jai Chapra, District Saran (Chapra) … Respondents. ----------- 2. 19.1.2010 Heard Mr. Ranjit Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Satyendra Kumar Jha, Standing counsel for Union of India. Invoking extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issue of a writ of certiorari for quashing of the order dated 1.12.2009 passed in M.A.No. 317/2009 arising out of O.A.No. 527/2009, whereby the Central Administrative Tribunal (for short ‘the Tribunal’) has declined to entertain the application for impleadment of the petitioner on the ground that he is neither a necessary nor proper party to 2 the application. Be it placed on record. The original applicant filed an application under section 19 of AT Act, 1985 challenging his order of termination. When the order of termination is challenged the lis/ dispute is between the employee and the employer and third party cannot seek intervention. Thus, we are not inclined to interfere with the matter. In the result, this application being, devoid of any merit, stands dismissed in limine. (Dipak Misra.C.J.) (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/