' .;; Itt' -o"^' HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR SingleBench : Hon'ble Shn H.L. Dattu, C.J. Writ Petltion No. 492 of 2002 Petitioners 1. UmarSingh, S/o Narsingh, Caste-Gond, Aged about 45years, working as Panch in Gram Pancha^t.Sohpur , 2. Kumbhaj, S/oPhatteSingh, Caste-Gond, Aged about 36 yeaFS, working as Panch in Gram Panchayat, Sohpur 3. Ghasiyaram, S/oKanhaiyya, Caste-Gond, Aged 40 yeare, working as a Panch in Gram Panchayat, Sohpur 4. Mansaram, S/o Dhanvaram, Caste-Gond, Aged about 32 years, working as a Panch in Gram Panohayat, Sohpur 5. Mahesh Das, S/o Phool , Singh, Caste- Gond, Aged about 40years, working as a ^ Panch in Gram Panohayat at, Sohpur ^ Vs. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Panohayat and Rural Development Department, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur 2. Commissioner, Raipur 3; Ad^ttional Collector, District Durg 4. SjLib-Divisional Cffioer (Revenue), Balod, District.Duig 5. VishalSingb, SfoJohan Ram.Agedabout 48 years,;Expe!led,SaFpanch, R/o Vinage- Sohpun Jahsil - Gurur, District Durg Resoondents !' 1 Presenfc •ShriRajeevShrivastava,eounselfbrtKepgtitioners. ORALORDER (Passedon21"'April,2007) As on today, in|my opinion, the relief sought fbr in this writ petition would not survive for consideration ofthis Court. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners is also ofthesame opinion. (2) . In that'view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of as having become Infructuous. Ordered accordingly.