THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.25875 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner was initially appointed as a Clerk in the third respo society in the year 1984 and by 2007, he was promoted as Secretary. He placed under suspension on 15.08.2009 and a show-cause notice was issu 09.09.2009. He approached this Court challenging the show-cause notice. writ petition was disposed of, at the admission stage, directing that the discip proceedings shall be completed within a period of four months. The Enquiry Officer submitted a report, dated 12.07.2010, holding th charges levelled against the petitioner are proved. Taking the same into ac the third respondent issued a show-cause notice, dated 28.07.2010, requirin petitioner to explain as to why he shall not be terminated from service. petitioner made a representation, dated 17.08.2010, stating that he handicapped from leading evidence during the enquiry and pleaded f opportunity to lead evidence. His grievance is that no action has been thereon. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Sta Counsel for the respondents. The writ petition is totally misconceived. Once the Enquiry Office submitted a report, he becomes functus officio and the question of permittin petitioner to lead evidence at this stage, does not arise. If the petitioner ha grievance vis-à-vis the report of the Enquiry Officer, he has to point out the sa the explanation to the show-cause notice, dated 28.07.2010. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order costs. ________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDD Date:20.10.2010 VGB