IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Crl. Misc. No. M-5749 of 2010 Date of Decision:11.02.2011 Subhash Sharma .....Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. R.K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. AG, Punjab. Mr. Onkar Rai, Advocate for respondents No.5 and 6. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C on behalf of the petitioner- Subhash Sharma for issuance of directions to respondents No.3 and 4 to register FIR against respondents No.5 and 6. Notice of motion was issued on 25.2.2010. In response thereto, reply on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 has already been filed, which is on record. Learned State Counsel submits that inquiry was conducted and it was found that a complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was pending before the Court and no ground was there to register any FIR as the matter was pending. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that complaint has been withdrawn by the petitioner. In view of the reply given by the learned State Counsel and the Crl. Misc. No. M-5749 of 2010 -2- fact that even if the complaint has been withdrawn, then separate application can be filed if there is any grouse, no case is made out to interfere in the matter and no further direction can be issued for registration of the FIR at this stage. Dismissed. February 11, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE