* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAC App. No. 256/2010 Date of Decision: Auoust 30, 20L0 SARDAR SINGH YADAV .....Appellants through Mr. Rajesh Rai, Advocate VCTSUS JAI PRAKASH AND ORS. ......Respondents through Mr. Manoj Ranjan Sinha, Advocate for respondent no.3. Mr. Basant Kumar, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 2. CORAM: . .J HON'BLE M|SS JUSTTCE REKHA SHARMA 1. Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the 'Digest,? REKHA SHARMA, I. (ORAL) Admittedly, the appeilant has not suffered any disability on account of the accident. Admittedly again, the appellant did not incur any sum over his treatment at Base Hospital. And yet, a sum of Rs' 3,000/- has been awarded to him towards medicines and a treatment, Rs. 13,600/- towards loss of income, Rs.25,000/- towards pain and suffering and Rs.10,000/_ towards conveyance and special diet' The appellant in my view has been reasonably compensated. There is no merit in the appeal. The same is dismissed. AUGUST 30, 2O1O PC. n-r,kh-';f Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified