Court No. 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Restoration Application No. 948/2008 In Writ Petition (S/S) 3519/2001 (Old No. 32211 of 1991) Khajan Singh ….Petitioner Versus The District Magistrate/ Collector, Uttar Kashi & Others ….Respondents Sri S.S. Chauhan, Advocate holding brief of Sri P.S. Rawat. learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner. Sri H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 12th August, 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. I am satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of restoration application. Hence, restoration application is allowed and the order dated 14.7.2008 passed by this Court is recalled. Writ petition is restored to its original number. 2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties, who submitted that the controversy involved in the present writ petition, on facts and law, is squarely covered and has already been resolved by the judgment and order dated 3.3.2006 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 6856(S/S) of 2001, Birendra Singh & Others v. District Magistrate/Collector, Uttar Kashi & Other and, as such, the present writ petition may be disposed of in terms and conditions of the aforesaid judgment. 2. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is also disposed of finally in terms and conditions of aforementioned judgment and order dated 3.3.2006 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 6865 (S/S) of 2001. (P.C. Verma, J.) 12.8.2008 Prabodh