FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 327 OF 2010 (Sunil Shrirangrao Fad Vs. The State of Maharashtra) ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ We heard learned counsel for the parties. Mr. Gaikwad, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, states that the Special Public Prosecutor has been appointed by the State and the Sessions Case No. 8 of 2009 is progressed. According to him, witness protection is being taken care of by the court concerned. Mr. Gaikwad, learned counsel on instructions, from the petitioner states that now the petitioner does not want to press for relief claimed in para 11-C). In our view, in the facts of the present case, now nothing survives in this writ petition for adjudication. Since the Sessions Case is still pending, Mr. Gaikwad, learned counsel seeks liberty of this court in relation to witness protection to move this Court by fresh petition, if facts necessitates. We also heard learned A.P.P. Mr. Godbharle for the State. Writ petition stands disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move this Court if the facts necessitates, in relation to witness protection. No costs. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) (S.B. DESHMUKH, J.) Date:06.07.2010. rlj/