:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1082 OF 2006 Mr. Shrikant Sitlaprasad Mishra ....Applicant. V/s The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ....Respondents. ---- Mr. I.P. Mishra for the applicant. Mr. R.Y. Mirza, APP for the State. --- CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J. DATE: DATE: DATE: 24th March, 2006 24th March, 2006 24th March, 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant has an apprehension that he is likely to be arrested in connection with C.R. No. 78 of 2006 registered at Malad Police Station for the offence punishable under sections 465, 466, 467, 471, 454, 457, 448 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The prosecution case is that the accused Hitendra Ashok Parmar had created fabricated tenancy agreement and the present applicant had forged signatures of two witnesses. The address of the present applicant which was shown in the said agreement, on investigation by the police, was found to be incorrect. The name of :2: the applicant also did not figure in the list of the hutment dwellers. This agreement was used by Hitendra Ashok Parmar for obtaining certain orders from the Small Causes Court and on the basis of this fabricated document a suit in the Small Causes Court was filed. 4. Considering these facts, in my view, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. The application is, therefore, rejected. 5. Application is accordingly disposed of. V.M. V.M. V.M. KANADE, J. KANADE, J. KANADE, J.