... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1344 OF 2007 PETITION NO.1344 OF 2007 PETITION NO.1344 OF 2007 .................................................................. Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. .................................................................. Shri Rajiv Patil for the Petitioners. Shri D.J.Lulia for the Respondent No.1. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : APRIL 12, 2007. : APRIL 12, 2007. : APRIL 12, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates appearing for the parties. The challenge in this Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to ad-interim order dated 04th December, 2006 passed by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court. Prima facie it appears to me that the order has been made with the consent of the parties. The effect of the order is that electricity supply to the premises occupied by the original Plaintiffs will be restored. The learned Advocate appearing for the first Respondent pointed out that the ad-interim order has been implemented and electricity supply has been restored. Statement is accepted. 2. No case is made out for interference. All contentions of the parties in the pending notice of motion are kept expressly open. Subject to what is stated above, Writ Petition is rejected. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE