Jl^jngie Bencrt ,^' tA IN THE mQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASWR WmT PETITION N0. /if^ OF 2004 PETITIONER: SukalaBai Aged about 56 years. W/0 Shri Khorbahara Village-& Post- Bhoring Distt. Mahasacaund. (C.G.) 3 VBRSUS RESPOKDENTS: Cis ^: '&^.s.^ litastauf l.State OfChhattisgarh Through Secretary , WaterResoures Deptt. Mantralaya, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.O.) 2. Sub-Divisional Officer Kodar Head Work Sub-Division Mahasamund. Chhattisgarh. WRTT PETITION TXNDER ARVICUE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION or n lA1^R ISSIUliTCESOFA iWRTFmTHB NATUIffi PROHroniON. CER'nOIlARI^BTC OR ANY OTHER IMRECTION OR ORDBR TO DO JUSTXCE IK THE MATTBR. 3n^r'%Tfipipp ^^i'^!^T^t%' ^' Gt: '3S|'^<<tl<ri^,^^WTtS,. .l»^.f>^&>^.taS%j[ ~3lA!?I XRW Wiw^Sffsn^i 31/01/2005 Shri SuniLQttwaait STiri A1rhi1 Agramal, R:T, Heard. / TIie petifioner by the prder of Aiinexure E-l by service with effeGt jrora petitiQner had already attaaii "years.. :•., : ; . ;. • ^ . Leacned counsel for ,fl had subsequeiijtl};' fakeii ttlie; tbe agp ofsuperannyationjii beea enliaitced te> 60 years. Annexure P-6. Leam.ed that siiiularly situated gaiig reinstated and passed suitab: dated 16/08/2004 iallieir fceamed cotuisel for petitioner has'aot attaiiied Amiexure P-6 ^even ttien 31/03/2003. Learued couiisel for th' fhe State Govenunent has 60 years vide oitler Aiuiexure I have heard leanied coifnsel wHieh 31^03/2003^ ftte coT.uibel ^>l<>li<'isftil11 *R<^ ^f fe'^il A[^'(-$K ^ affifft^gi^!! ,,;,. sS fcr the petitioner. fiir the State. uistant pefitian tias challenged the the petitioner was reiiioved frpm on. the gr&und that fhje sdfhe age of superaaauation i.e. 55 petitioner suteinits fhat the State |a6Glsion dated SSfQ8f2004 wb/eiKby |tlie:Water ReSQurces Departaieiit has The above oider has faeen BJed as fcr fhe petitioner further subiuits weredirectedfcy^liisCourttobe |e order ia accordaace witK'Hie drder also. •• :'. •' • .,••;", : .,. l^ petitipncr subnuts^^fhat & a^e of 60 5rea.rs as per policv yide petitioner has been retired on itiea calses ttie tlie respondents has not disputed fhat en|ha.aeed fhe age of superaniiuation to |P-6.. •1 : ; . - : " "• co^uisel for fhe partiei PRJ—FS/350—12/2000—50,000. « -:^^^®^®^^£&^ "?i;^.'^' ^^^i^^'^^l^^n,'.^, XI-HG—78 *11* 11 »»11<»» B^.^IWCT^; Wtily'tto, f^wy i^^^Q^m^ 200 311^1 ^TR-li* ^wsii^rginw llf ^ *^ J' IS' fflNIP'" ^S|lS?I'q5B)'tljc|{^sJ^T)' TOnwHfpi 3)1^1 -<2- Leamed couns .;!l:'SSi'i3aS'iSSS3§ 'petit:i'6iiKiKf^s'^graated lib ^l for fhe petitioneFsubuiits that if fhe |rty to raake representation to the resp&xialsatSa^o consider bfer case for icuistatenient as per new ,:!^s:r:^^^^s:yfs^~ '. •.-"'~~-"'-- '—-i-~;,;-~~---'-'~~-.- T—-—---——-^.—. ^^-- .•—- --_ ^pHB^isBS'^ttHiexure P-6 a^ul on such representation beiug Inade ^^^^if%^^w^^ by fhe petitioner, the samj period ia the ends ofjustice) Thus, consideruig tb^ faets aad circi.unstaaces of the case aad furtUer consideriilg fb| has been eithaiiced td 6( am of Uie opinian:fliat fhe| petitioner is given liberty fhe respondents for reuistaf wiftun 10 days froin tpdayj respondents withui a furfhj of such representatioH a^ Aruiexure P-6 atid in th.e U inW.P. No. 1149/2003. Wifh fhas observatiod Wt<l[d<Il*1 'RR^ff ^f f^?^' •<pq't$R ^F3iRlH3Ilt5I^.. is t6 be decided withia a stipulated shattbe served, faet fhat the age of supei-annuation ) yearsr and .fius^.CoUFti^i^ No. 1149/2003 vide ffiS^ cl^t^,^/ /^Q(W^^^^^^^l^ fhe lEspoiidea^^ ts^i^ODS.td^^Bescas^^^of already^^Tetirea;'gaag iilen, I ends of justice woyld be served if the o iiiatee detafled represeiitation before bemsnt as per policy vide AtinexurG- P-6 aad the same shatt fbe deeided by fhe ;r penod offpurweGks fi~ojn the receipt fhe light of change of policy vide gllt oforder dated 29/09/2004 gassed !, fhe petition is disposed of. Sd/- Dhu-endra Mishra Judge