IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C. Review No. 143 of 2011 Date of decision: 31.10.2011 Gilam Dei …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3 and 5. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) By means of this review petition, the petitioner seeks recall of the judgment dated 11th August, 2011, passed by this Court. 2. The main ground for seeking review of the order is that vide order dated 7th September, 2011, the Public Information Officer has given some clarification that mid day meal workers are temporary employees and there is no provision for grant of leave except school vacations and other school holidays to them. 3. This is information which was collected after the writ petition was decided and was not available to this Court at that 1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes. -: 2 :- time, and, therefore, cannot be taken into consideration while reviewing the order. Therefore, I find no merit in the review petition and the same is dismissed accordingly. (Deepak Gupta) Judge October 31, 2011 (rajni)