IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36017 of 2011 1.Janak Paswan, Son of Late Shankar Paswan. 2.Jayel Paswan, Son of Late Shankar Paswan. 3.Kashi Paswan, Son of Baldeo Paswan. 4.Ram Pravesh Paswan, Son of Late Paltan Paswan. 5.Paras Paswan, Son of Late Sahdeo Paswan. 6.Rajendra Paswan, Son of Late Amal Paswan. 7.Kanhaiya Paswan, Son of Basdeo Paswan. All residents of village Sagraua, P.S. Purushottampur, District West Champaran. -------Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party -------------- 02/- 14/11/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners learned counsel for the complainant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the seven petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 354 & 379 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the Prevention of Witch Craft Practices Act (Dian Act), are named accused in this complaint case. Submission is that there is absolutely no allegation against petitioner no. 7, namely, Kanhaiya Paswan and against remaining petitioners; the case has been lodged due to previous enmity with certain allegations of misbehaviour with the complainant at the instance of Ojha. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1209-C of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition to petitioner nos. 1, 2, 3 & 5 to remain physically present before the court below till disposal of the case and additional condition to petitioner nos. 4 & 6 to physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)