IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35670 of 2010 HARI MANJHI & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the State. At the very outset learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioner no.1, namely, Hari Manjhi has already been arrested. In the aforesaid circumstance the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no.1 stands dismissed being infructuous. So far as petitioner nos.2 and 3 are concerned, admittedly petitioner no.2 is mother- in-law and petitioner no.3 is unmarried Nanad of deceased. It appears from the F.I.R. that the marriage of deceased had taken place four years ago and she had given two children on account of aforesaid wedlock. It further appears from the contents of F.I.R. itself that she led her marriage life happily and peacefully near about four years. Learned counsel for the petitioners points out Annexure-2, which is a petition said to be filed by the informant before C.J.M., Chapra, and 2 submits that the informant lodged this case under misconception and subsequently when he came to know about real facts he filed the aforesaid petition before C.J.M., Chapra. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail application is allowed and it is ordered that petitioners, namely, Kunti Devi and Rukmina Kumari @ Rukmini Kumari, in the event of arrest/surrender within 30 days from the date of communication of this order to the concerned court in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No.68 of 2009, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chapra(Saran), subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. PN/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)