IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.517 of 2010 1. Anil Kumar 2. Sujeet Kumar 3. Rahul Kumar All sons of Late Lal Bahadur Paswan and resident of village – Aspatal Tola, Bariarpur, P.O. Bariarpur, P.S. Muffasil, District – Munger. Versus State Of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 05. 25.11.2011 Heard the parties. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the Opposite Party No. 5 stating therein that the admissible payments have been made to the petitioners. However, as stated in Paragraph – 15 of the show cause that provisional family pension is being paid as admissible to the petitioner no. 3, Rahul Kumar. As regards, final pension and G.P.F. the same could not be done as the Opposite Party No. 7 is not appearing even after paper publication. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the ground that Opposite Party No. 7 is not appearing, the final order for payment of pension and G.P.F. cannot be held and it should be issued so that the eligible petitioner may receive the share of his pension and G.P.F. Considering the submissions of the parties and the show cause, I am not inclined to proceed further in the matter and the same stands disposed of. However, as submitted on behalf of the State, the final order would be passed with respect to the payment of pension and G.P.F. preferably within a period of two months. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)