IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6918 of 2010 RAM UDGAR CHOUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 15.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. I failed to understand how the case under different sections of Indian Penal Code is made out as it began with complainant’s going to the petitioner’s house in a marriage and in the night some act was done by this petitioner constituting an offence under section 354 IPC, for that her husband was instigated and then there was some assault and demand from the complainant. The matter to consider here is that if demand was being made by this petitioner also then there was no occasion of going of the complainant to his house or if something happened then only demand was made that also is not believable otherwise the overt act of the petitioner is taken for cognizance under section 354 IPC entitles the petitioner for anticipatory bail. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the 2 date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Complaint Case No. 1796©/09, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)