MC 2390/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. S Das, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. A Choudhury, learned Counsel for the opposite party. It is pointed out on the basis of the averments made in the application that the number of the title appeal in the concluding paragraph of the judgment and orde r dated 16.05.2011 ought to read as Title Appeal No. 26/2009 instead of 26/2008. This typographical error is borne out by the records and, therefore, necessary c orrection, as prayed for, is made. In the result, Title Appeal No. 26/2008 appearing the operative portion of the j udgment and order dated 16.05.2011 would now read as Title Appeal No. 26/2009. T his order would form an integral part of the aforementioned judgment and order. The miscellaneous application stands allowed in the above terms.