IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2008 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1930 SA.No. 569 of 1996() -------------------- AS.10/1993 of SUB COURT, KASARAGOD OS.290/1985 of PRL.MUNSIFF, KASARAGOD .................... APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 IN LOWER APPELLATE COURT/DEFENDANTS 1 AND 2 IN TRIAL COURT: ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.P.ABDULLA HAJI, RSIDING AT KALANAD VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, POST KALANAD. 2. AISABI, RESIDING AT -DO- -DO-. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER SRI.V.RAMKUMAR NAMBIAR RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT AND RESPONDENTS 3, 4 IN THE LOWER APPELLATE COURT AND PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS 3 AND 4 IN THE TRIAL COURT.: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. T.K.MUHAMMED KUNHI, RESIDING AT KUNDANKUZHI OF BEDADKA VILLAGE OF KASARAGOD TALUK, POST KUNDANKUZHI. 2. K.M.MOHAMMED, RESIDING AT KOONAMKADAVU OF PERIYA VILLAGE OF KASARAGOD TALUK, POST KUNDANKUZHI. 3. H.BABU, S/O H.PANIKKAN, RESIDING AT BEDADKA VILLAGE OF KASARAGOD TALUK, POST KUNDANKUZHI. BY ADV. SRI.K.G.GOURI SANKAR RAI THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/03/2008, ALONG WITH SA NO.787 OF 1996 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ---------------------------------- S.A.NOS.569/96 & 787/96 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2008 J U D G M E N T Though enough time was granted to cure the defects, the appellants failed to cure the defects. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that though registered letters were sent to the parties, they have not turned up. The second Appeal is therefore dismissed for default. However, liberty is granted to the appellants to cure the defects within three weeks and to apply for restoration. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE. dsn