IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Interim Relief Application No.5372 of 2008 In Writ Petition No. 848 of 2008 (S/S) Rajeev Kumar S/o Sri Mahendra Pal Singh, R/o Village Quari, Post and Tehsil-Ramnager, District Nainital. .........Petitioner. Versus Director, Vidhyalai Siksha & three others ..............Respondents. Sri B.S. Adhikari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Sri Sudhir Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.4. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant admission to the petitioner for special B.T.C. Training Course. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner passed his B.Sc. from Kumaon University in the year 1997 and completed his B.Ed. Course from Ruhelkhand University. Learned counsel for the petitioner further drew attention of this Court to Annexure 8 to the writ petition, which is a letter dated 5th January 2008, whereby Additional Secretary of National Council for Teachers Education, Northern Regional Committee has informed to the petitioner under Right to Information Act that B.Ed. Degree issued by Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Ruhelkhand, University is recognized one. Learned counsel for the petitioner further drew attention of this Court to Annexure 9 to the writ petition, in which the Principal DIET (respondent no.3) himself has informed the petitioner that the said authority has sought guidelines from the Director, School Education in the matter of treating B.Ed. Degree from Ruhelkhand University as recognized one or not. Having heard Sri B.S. Adhikari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sudhir Singh, learned counsel for NCTE (respondent no.4). as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 to 3, this Court thinks it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition summarily, permitting the petitioner to make a representation, which shall be decided by respondent no.3 within a period of one month from making of such representation. Accordingly, the writ petition is summarily disposed of, with the observation that the petitioner may make a representation within a period of one week from today for redressal of his grievances to respondent no.3 who shall decide the same within a period of one month from receiving such representation along with the certified copy of this order. (Interim Relief Application No.5372 of 2008 also stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt. 19.08.2008 Arti