IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 8TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 28126 of 2008(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- GEORGE KUNNUMPURAM CHACKO, S/O.CHACKO, AGED 47 YEARS, KUNNUMPURAM HOUSE, CHERTHALA NORTH VILLAGE, PRESENTLY EMPLOYED AT 6748 E, 91 IST PLACE, APT # 3 TULSA, O K 74133, REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER CHACKO @ KUNJAPPAN, AGED 55 YEARS, KUNNUMPURATH HOUSE, CHERTHALA NORTH VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.SAJEEV RESPONDENT(S): --------------- CHERTHALA MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, CHERTHALA. ADV. SRI.J.OM PRAKASH FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.28126 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 30th day of September, 2008 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the petitioner's application for approval of the building plan and sanction of the building permit is not being considered by the respondent Municipality. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Municipality submits that the petitioner's application, Ext.P5, would be considered after hearing the petitioner within two weeks. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of recoding the above submission of the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to be represented by an authorised representative before the Municipality in the matter. The respondent is directed to hear the authorised representative of the petitioner, if the representative appears along with a properly authenticated authorisation. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2