IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.13944 -M of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : MARCH 02, 2010 RAKSHA DEVI & ORS. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. VS Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) This petition under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, has been filed for quashing of case FIR No.119 dated 26.9.2008 under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 404, 418 read with Section 120-B, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Machhiwara, Tehsil Samrala, District Ludhiana. Learned counsel for the respondent-State contends that, on investigation, it has been found as a matter of fact that three daughters of Shakuntla Devi were intentionally not shown in the pedigree table. Shivani, Puja and Vansikha were required to be shown as legal heirs of Shakuntala Devi, pre-deceased daughter of Ram Singh. The accused in Criminal Misc. No.13944 -M of 2009 2 connivance with the officials working in the Revenue department, got prepared and verified a wrong pedigree table. The original owners have been deprived of their vested rights and offences, as alleged, have been committed. In view of the detailed facts that have emerged on investigation and as have been brought out in para-3 of the affidavit filed by Shri Ravinder Loomba, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Samrala, Police District Khanna, on behalf of respondent No.1, I find no reason to quash the FIR and proceedings while exercising jurisdiction under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure. Evidence cannot be taken by way of affidavit and counter affidavit to say that the facts brought out from the FIR and investigation are disproved. In view of the above, this petition is dismissed. March 02, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?