1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4594 OF 2009 (Laxman G. Mundhe & Ors. vs. Ajitkumar S. Soni) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. NOVEMBER 03, 2009. Heard Shri Kshirsagar, learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner – defendant challenges concurrent orders. The trial Court has granted temporary injunction on 20.12.2007 to the respondent – plaintiff. That order is maintained by the Principal District Judge, Buldhana, in Misc. Civil Appeal on 6.10.2009. The contention of the petitioner is that on the basis of 1998 transaction, possession is being claimed from 2003 and the time gap or the mode and manner of receipt of possession has not been disclosed. It is further contended that sale of 45R land is prohibited and relevant provision is Section 8 of the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 and the learned Principal District Judge, has considered Section 31 thereof. The learned appellate Court has passed an order concurring with the findings of the learned trial Court. It has, therefore, not considered all the facts at 2 length. The arguments advanced are technical and in writ jurisdiction, not sufficient to interfere with these orders. However, considering the fact that suit is of the year 2007 and defence of present petitioner is of illegal money lending, the proceedings in Regular Civil Suit No. 98 of 2007 are expedited and the trial Court is directed to decide the same as early as possible and in any case within a period of six months from the date of communication of this order to it. With these observations, writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.