^ :t"^'-,.^'\-':.-'"..^^' B— '?% ".:W:x»W.:^. w^'v&is °:K:s '•.^'•~^~ IN 'SSB M&BH'xa . SR^QESH •saaHISSSAKVE . •EiaBBNM. o.&.se. w OS' 1995 .^.••BstweeBi;.' \ • ' '.• • • •/'•;':-'; .:'••' .- .• '• • . ..•'•.••'.'.,:.. '.. • an-fc» ly.a-ti B. %Bft^ ?Si^ o£ Shel Bal Kisti®^odwal^ aged ateo^;4Q yeaFs^^sos^ed-;as':% M. awses ;2raiSa^g. C^'Cl?^^&ajtgaxfafe^restdQat: of^/Raigarfa* 1»; '.ajpp&ie^fifa" A »d Sfcate.pf. Secrerfcary, BHOE'M-.';1'. Pradesh,. tferougii the i . - : : ,r; , of^ Neal-tfa sBid^ Fsaa3.^'' lSaa:'e •Directeir,..M6at1:h: Serylcea,,, BIQPaE.^,'/,-',.• . -1. •. : .':^ 3«(:^::.Shia'fe^^-SlaBiafaYa: ' ^: SlsteeE;'3Sa't®ff,,stt: .. '; 'SeB'tre!^ •;SmMlfa^ur V/w 'So't ,}s)aowR,'^@©s^.edPas t.^i^es^.BeaI^ 'WiarkeiF'- ^4.:, y::::, .Chief: •BeaieaE .^i':; "•';~ •". .^ ..• '• •:.: •.-.R^ISABH* : i-aiid;^Hec^.^h:0£:ficei-^: ssssssBsass ^lji^l^^ :DE£AILS_OE_AFE&ICMlffl}.. Pi 1 ^ r HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition(s) No. l07atof2005 Petifener Smt. Kirti B. Podwal Versus Respondents State of Madhya Pradesh & ofhers 8B: Hoa'bte Mr. Justice Satteh K. AanUioteI, J Shri Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioaer. Shri Ajay Dwwedi, Panel lawyer for the respondeats/ State. ORAL ORDBR (ll&Juty,2006) 1. Lcamed counsel for tfae petitioiKT submits tfaat the petitiaoer, who was workiug as Sister Tutora, fikd ftss petition questioiung entiy of her aame in the gradatfon Ust published on 23.5.1991. 2. Leamcd counscl Eypearmg for the respondents/State subinits fhat thc gradation list has becn corrected subsequentfy ia the gradation Ust pubUshed on 4.4.1995 (AitDfixure A/1). It is stated on oafh in the retura filed on behalf of fhe 3. Itlitii^l.lii ii Bablu KUttlfcwuwBmu, respondents/State that the petittouer has been placed at serial No. 23 and it was proposcd for proniotion in the nesrt coimng DPC. Learaed counsel for the petitioner is not fa a position to state as to whefher fhe nanie offhe pctitioncrwas considered or iiot In view of the said subiussua made by teamed counsel far tfae respondcnts and fhe retura ffled by the respoadents, nofhn^ survives in the inatter. In fhe event, if any grievance stiU siuvives ni the plac»mentof peti.tioner's name ia fhe gradation Mst, the pctitioncr is at liberty to^take appropriate steps. For the reasons stated-abovc, the petitfon is dfanrissed as having becoine mfi-uctuous. No order as to costs. _— Satish K. Agiiihotri ; Judge n