THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3857 OF 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking to assail the order dated 14.07.2010 in I.A.No.1108 of 2010 in O.S.No.71 of 2009 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri, in rejecting the application filed under Section 45 of the Evidence Act, 1872 {“the Act” for brevity}, and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to send the suit promissory note to the Government Forensic Laboratory to determine the difference with regard to the ink and handwriting on the body of the suit promissory note and signature thereon. Since this Court has already taken a view that in a suit of this nature based on a promissory note and alleging forgery, the burden would always lie on the plaintiff to prove the bona fides. Absolutely, there is no warrant for the defendant to seek any such exercise under Section 45 of the Act. In case the plaintiff fails to prove the same, it is always open for the defendant to take the advantage thereof. Hence, I do not find any justification in interdicting with the order of the Court below. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 3rd September 2010 RRB