WP(C) 702/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) THE HON’B LE MR. JUSTICE A.C.UPADHYAY Ranjan Gogoi, CJ(Acting). The two respondents in this writ petition were selected for appointment as Produ ction Assistant in the Doordarshan Kendra at Guwahati in the year 1994. Appointm ents not having been forthcoming the respondents moved the learned Central Admin istrative Tribunal, Guwahati Bench by instituting O.A. No.7 of 1998 wherein the learned Tribunal by order dated 15.10.99 directed the Doordarshan authorities to appoint the respondents as Production Assistant. In compliance of the said orde r of the learned Tribunal appointments were made on 3.1.2000 in the scale of pay of Rs.6500 - 10,500/-. The respondents joined on 3.1.2000 itself. By a corrigendum dated 27.1.2000 the pay scale of the respondents were reduced t o Rs.5000 - 8000/- in accordance with a letter dated 25.2.99 issued by the Minis try of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India. Aggrieved, the respond ents instituted the Original Application No.126/2008 out of which this writ peti tion has arisen. Noticing an earlier order of the Principal Bench of the Tribunal dated 28.8.2006 passed in O.A. Noi.1462/2005 passed in similar facts the learned Tribunal had p assed the impugned order dated 4.8.2009 in O.A. No.126/2008 directing grant of p ay scale of Rs.6500 - 10500/- to the respondents. Aggrieved, this writ petition has been filed. We have noticed that the order impugned in the present case have merely followed the earlier order dated 28.8.2006 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.1462/2005. The aforesaid order dated 28.8.2 006 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.1462/2005 was implemented by the Doordarshan authorities by issuing an order dated 7.6.2007. However, such implementation was made subject to the decision o f the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the writ petition filed against the aforesaid order dated 28.8.2006 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrativ e Tribunal in O.A. No.1462/2005. The learned Tribunal having merely followed the order of the Principal Bench whi ch was implemented by the respondents we do not find any infirmity with the dire ctions issued in the present case. However, as the order of the Principal Bench dated 28.8.2005 passed in O.A. No.1462/2005 has been made subject to the outcome of the writ petition pending before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court we are of the view that the impugned directions passed by the learned Tribunal in the present case should be similarly made subject to such orders as may be passed in the wri t petition filed against the order of the Principal Bench dated 28.8.2005 passed in O.A. No.1462/2005 and the decision that may be taken by the Doordarshan auth orities on such order as may be passed in the writ petition. The writ petition shall stand disposed of in the above terms.