1 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET WRIT PETITION NO.2733 OF 2010 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.Jayesh Kalauke for the petitioner None for the respondent CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : APRIL 8,2010 P.C.: 1 It is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that a remedy of filing a revision application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 is available to the petitioner for challenging the impugned order. Therefore, this writ petition cannot be entertained and the same is rejected by keeping the remedy open. To enable the petitioner to adopt such remedy, the decree for possession shall not be executed for a period of four weeks from today. JUDGE 2