1 ABA-331.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.331 OF 2011 {For Anticipatory Bail} Dattatraya Shivaji Pawar & Anr. .... Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents S/Shri Subhash Jha i/b Subhash Hulyalkar for the Applicants. Ms G.P. Mulekar, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: APRIL 19, 2011 P.C: 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by two persons whose names are included in the list of 63 participants in the incident named in the FIR. No specific role has been ascribed to the applicants. Considering this, it is not clear as to what purpose would be served by subjecting the applicants to custodial interrogation. Both the applicant, in the event of their arrest in C.R. No.30 of 2011 of Chakan Police Station, District Pune, be released on bail on their furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- 2 ABA-331.11 each with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs.25,000/- per person on the condition that the applicants shall report at the police station concerned on 25-4-2011 at 10:00 a.m. for interrogation and thereafter as and when required by the I.O.. The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and they shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the trial Court. 2. This order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge-sheeted, the applicants may furnish fresh bond before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, dated 2-12-2010, delivered in Criminal Appeal No.2271 of 2010, arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 7615 of 2009 {Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.}. 3. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)