IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SUNDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 24124 of 2008 Between: P.T.Saikrishna Prasad S/o. Kondala Rao, Indukurupeta(V) Devipatnam(M) E.G District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer Devipatnam P.S E.G District 2 The Tahasildar Devipatnam,E.G District 3 Kunjam Jagapathi Rao Uppayyapalem, Sarabhavaram(V) Devipatnam(M) E.G District 4 Kunjam Krishna Uppayyapalem, Sarabhavaram(V) Devipatnam(M) E.G District 5 Kunjam Subba Rao Uppayyapalem, Sarabhavaram(V) Devipatnam(M) E.G District 6 Kunjam Thammanna Dora Uppayyapalem, Sarabhavaram(V) Devipatnam(M) E.G District 7 Murram Nookaraju Uppayyapalem, Sarabhavaram(V) Devipatnam(M) E.G District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1&2 in not taking any action of the representation of the petitioner dt 22-9- 2008 as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and violative of Art 14,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1&2 to take appropriate action on the representation made by the petitioner dt 22-9-2008 as per law in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR. K.VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.24124 OF 2008 ORDER : The petitioner herein states to have made a representation dated 22.09.2008 requesting the respondents 1 and 2 herein to provide police protection to his life and property making certain allegations against the respondents 3 to 7 herein. Contending that the respondents 1 and 2 herein failed to take any action, the present writ petition is filed. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents, without expressing any opinion as to the correctness of the allegations made by the petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.09.2008 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 05.11.2008 gbs