x SSnc2! •>-!^ g s tS i- ^f? ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl N0.1 OF 2011 PETITIONER : /_ RESPONDENTS: ^2^?%. ^^<l^^ ^ /^^^-< ^-^y^ ^^././•• Ram Bharosa Verma, S/o Tuka Ram Verma, aged about 24 years, R/o village Bijnapur, Post Mohara, Tahsil Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon (CG). Versus 1. State -of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Departnient of Panchayat SE Social Welfare, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 2. Janpad Panchayat, Keshkal, District Bastar (CG), thrbugh its Chief Executive Officer. ^ 3. Anand Singh Thakur, the then Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Keshkal, District Bastar (CG), Through the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Keshkal, District Bastar (CG) Head Master, Janpad Primary School, Iragaon, Janpad Panchayat, Keshkal, District Bastar (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner, above named, inost humbly and respectfully beg to submits as under: - Details ofthe petition: - 1 PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER : As mentioned in fhe cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS T [^f1^11 "^ 7Tnrart;T^OT7^^E3['^'T-"£^-sl*^*-a*'KK*^= « ^ 'S^ '<<WM<i, yifll'M'IS, f°«'1l'Hlj,< ^. (/)• P. ^.') 1^0. 3<3-®^/n tfTOcff a»*1(eh """""'"""""""""""""""""^ 200 sii^r Tra^' (tcifja<<iEf) sil^l^t Ks-fi'* 'cTt?T 3TI^?T gi^icti TOIIW ^ffer sn^i r' SB: Hon'bie Shri Manindra Moha 15-OS-2Q11 applicjation not peing Shri B.D.Guru, counsel for th| Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy No.1 and 4 on advance copy. The grievance, as set out though the petitioner has submittec< he submitted an apptication for ^ Executive Officer pressurized the p^ Leamed counsel for the petitioner has submittect his Chief Executive Officer is not application and tte petitioner is The grievance of the petitior been harassing the petitioner. Th^ have been placed on record show| resignation but tater on, he submitt^ resignation vide application dated required to take appropriate decj; regard to the withdrawal of the case of the petitioner. Theref< Executive Officer, Janpad Panchai on petitioners representation with iight of the provisions contained inj The matter shail be decided by th^ two months from the date of receipt resigna|tlon chi<i?<f*fr'T 4i*«rff^f 'f^S <^Irl^.l< ^;3lfOT3I!t?l h Shrivastava. J. ^ petitioner. General for the State/'respondent Advocate b^ the petitioner in the writ petition is that resignation from service, but later on, the ntithdrawing his resignation but the Chief Witioner. rietitioner submits that even though ttie for withdrawing his resignation, the j)assing any order whatsoever, on his aliowed to work. lier is that the Chief Executive Officer has pleadings as weli as documente which that initiaily the petitionersubmitted his ^d an application seeking withdrawal ofhis P8/5Q011. The Chief Executive Officer is jsion on petitioner's representation with in the iightof retevant service rules in >re, it wouid be proper to direct the Chief rat, Keshkal to take appropriate decision regard to withdrawai of resignation in the |the relevant and applicable service rules. Chief Executive Ofncer wtthin a period of of copy of this order. ff'.^^ ^ •f L^-p'Sa.L ^ SsSSS^SS, S '"^saaw-'^ XI-HG—78 ^- «<i*rwi a>Nich 'TST •<iWWi, ®tfl'M<l(o,faftiyy . to.f.c^'^o- 3o~^>/?' •T(T;200 sn^f'T^i' (yi^'t'?) sn^svi k-u* 'cWT 3TT^?T si>*lich ?TOBR ^fer 3D^r 3- Deepti ^ Needlessto emphasize, ifth the Chief ,Execjjtive Officer, it wo remedy as;!may be available to statutory appeal availabte under ^ petitioner Is aggrieved bythe decision of jld be open for him to take recourse to |iim under the law including remedy of provisions of ChhatUsgarh Panchayats t^e (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1995.1 With the aforesaid obsen/atic]ns, Uie petition is finalty disposed off. q»^rf^l<ltlItffi^ Tf fS^ •(f^R^.K ^T 3JRl*T SIT^l Sd-/ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge