IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.38762 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 21, 2011 Dharampal & others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Rajesh Lamba, Advocate, for Mr.Minderjeet Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The submission made by the counsel is that the investigation in this case was conduced by an officer, who was related to the complainant and hence in a biased manner. The petitioners have now approached this court when the challan has already been presented. Their grievance is that they are being accused of an offence under Section 188 IPC, for which the cognizance could be taken only in terms of Section 195 Cr.P.C. If the petitioners had any grievance against the officer, who had conducted the investigation, they should have made an appropriate approach at the relevant time. They perhaps are late in making the present approach. Now they have to raise all these pleas before the trial Court. Liberty is granted to the petitioners to raise all these pleas before the trial Court. Disposed of accordingly. December 21, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE