IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.21878 of 2011 Date of Decision:- November 25, 2011 Sanjay Jaggi ...Petitioner Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panchkula and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present: Mr.Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Satish Kumar Mittal, J. (Oral) The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuing directions to the respondents to deliver him the possession of Plot No.31, Sector 21-C-III, Faridabad, which was re-allotted in his name in the year 1995; or to allot him an alternative plot in any other Sector. It is the case of the petitioner that after issuance of the re- allotment letter in his favour, he has paid all the installments and now nothing is due towards the said plot. In spite of that, the respondents have not handed over possession of the said plot to him. It is further the case of the petitioner that after making repeated requests, the petitioner served a legal notice dated 5.10.2011, copy of which has been annexed with the petition as Annexure P-3, but till date the said legal notice has not been considered and decided by the respondent authorities. Civil Writ Petition No.21878 of 2011 -2- In view of the aforesaid facts, after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, we dispose of this petition, without issuing notice to the other side as it will unnecessary delay the matter, with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decide the legal notice dated 5.10.2011 (Annexure P-3) in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE November 25, 2011 (PARAMJEET SINGH) vkg JUDGE