1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3120/2009 (DEVANAND RADHEKRUSHNA MISHRA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. R.K.Tiwari, Advocate, for applicant. Mr. Dhote, APP for Respondent State. CORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED : JANUARY 29, 2010. Heard. Grievance of the applicant is that despite order passed by this Court dated 8th September, 2009 in Criminal Application No. 1613/2009, when prayer for bail was refused, the trial Court was directed as follows. “However, the trial Court would endeavour to dispose of the sessions case as early as possible”. In view of this specific direction, learned APP was directed to take instructions regarding probable date of hearing of Sessions Case. Learned APP stated that Charge Sheet was filed on 12.12.2007 and the Sessions Case is numbered as 4/2009. 2 Learned counsel for the applicant has also made a grievance that the case was committed to the Court of Sessions only when the applicant moved before the learned Magistrate concerned. According to the learned APP, charge is framed on 14.10.2009 and Sessions Case is fixed for production of accused on 4/2/2010, but he is not aware as to when the recording of evidence will commence. Under these circumstances, if the trial do not commence within a period of one month from today, the trial Court shall release the applicant on bail upon suitable terms & conditions subject to satisfaction of the trial Court. Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Rvjalit.