1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.383 OF 2007 Bhupendra Chagganlal Tailor ..Applicant V/s. Lahorilal Khemraj Jain & anr. ..Respondents Mr.S.G.Kurup, Advocate, for applicant None for respondent No.1 Mr.J.P.Yagnik, A.P.P, for the State CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 29TH JULY, 2008 P.C. . Heard. 2. There is a delay of 3 years and 312 days in filing application for leave to appeal. In paragraph 3 of the application several aspects are referred by applicant for not approaching the Court in time. One of them is that his lawyer did not intimate him in time and he was required to move to several places for attending the matter. He had to go through hardship for even arranging money to collect the expenses for the claim lodged before 2 M.A.C.T, Mumbai. The applicant was also required to attend several matters about his immovable property. According to him, all these factors multiplied in the delay. 3. Since the applicant was genuinely prevented by circumstances from approaching this Court, though delay is for inordinate four years and as the learned counsel for the applicant has agreed in the beginning itself to finally hear the main application. Delay is condoned. Application is allowed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)