1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION rpa WRIT PETITION NO. 172 OF 2010 Kum. Sharada Keshowdas Bhalla & Anr. .. Petitioners. v/s. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents. .... Mr. S. A. Sawant for Petitioner. Ms. Trupti Puranik for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. S. M. Shettigar for Respondent Nos. 5 to 7. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 1, 2010. P.C. Since the Petition involves disputed questions of facts, the writ petition cannot be entertained by this Court. However, the Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 shall maintain status-quo in respect of the suit property described in prayer clause (b) of the Petition for a period of four weeks from today to enable the Petitioners to take out appropriate proceedings including filing of a suit. All contentions of the parties are kept open. The learned Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 has confirmed the statement made by 2 the Advocate for the Petitioners that the Petitioners are presently in possession of a part of the Bunglow. 2. Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. [ S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ]