IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4224 of 2009 Paramhans Tiwary . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors . ----------- 02. 19.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It is the contention of the petitioner that his pay was revised in light of the orders of this Court vide Annexure-3, notwithstanding which the benefit of the revised pay scale has not been made available to him. Nearly over two years have passed since the filing of the writ petition. No useful purpose shall be served by adjourning the matter for a counter affidavit. If the pay scale of the petitioner was revised vide Annexure-3and entries made in a service book, if the same has not been modified or annulled, naturally the petitioner is entitled to be paid according to the same. Any further grievances with regard to grant of ACP may also be agitated simultaneously by the petitioner. Let any such representation of the petitioner be disposed by reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the respondents find justification in the claim/claims or in any part of the claim/claims, it is expected that necessary consequential orders shall be issued simultaneously. The application stands disposed. Devendra/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)