Qié’éigiE EEKégEg :6 $faW/K IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA‘ITISGAhH AT BILASPUR (6.6.) w.P.(5)No. Eblg /2o1o Ramaashrya Pradhcm, Aged abouf 59 year's, S/o‘ Shri SadHmm Pr‘adhan, Head Master, Governmenf Primary School Sa‘rhar, Bamnidih, Dis‘rrict- Janjgir-Cham‘p'a (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS t /1. Stae of Chha‘r’riSgarh Through Sécrefary, School Educm‘ion Departmenf D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) /2. Direcfor, Public Inslr'uc‘rions Raipur‘ (C.G.) Join’r Direcl‘or‘, Treasury, Accoun’r and-pension, Biluspur_(C.G.) /4. Dis’rricT Educcn‘ion Officer Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) Block Educa‘rion Officer, Bamnidih, Dls’rr'lcl- Janjgirachampa t (cc) ' WRIT PETITION UNDER’ ARTICLE 226 OF THE ‘ CONSTITuION OF INDTA %"}w 3 / HIGH COURT OF CHHATFISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 7628 0f2010 \ PETITIONER : Ramaashraya Pram. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Stale ofChhmisgarh & .ahers. 2] WRIT PETI'l ION UNDER AR l'ICLb 226 OF THE CONS'I ITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satkh K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Anup Majumdar Advocate on behalf of Shri K.S.Pawar, Advocate for the pentwner Shn Y S Thakur, Dy A.(J for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 03‘ day of January, 201 1) 1. The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs. 100/-. Met completion ofhis probation period, he was granted w regular pay scale. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe yetitioner submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale we]? the date initial appointment or after completion of probation period. 3. The issue involgedflie'r‘e‘in was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in 0.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State ofMLP. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme l Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the \ Teachem/Assistant Teachers are’entitled to regular pay scale mm date of initial appointment. . Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also submits that this court, while considering the same issue inAmar Sai Ram & others K9. -- , State of Chhattisgarh & others [W.P. (S) No. 4725/2006] by order dated 01.09.2006, allowed the petitioners to make a representation along with copy of the petition and annexures within a period. of ten days, raising all their gievances and in tum the concemed respondent was directed to decide the representation in an objective manner within a period of 30 days horn the date of receipt of the representation. . Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation raising all his grievances and in tum, the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law, on its ovgn merits, within a period of 8 weeks hem-the date ofreeeipt ofthe representation. . In view of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order asto _ i costs. Sd/— Judge i / 3H5“. / ’ i Satish K. Agnihotri'9 J