#28. % 17.08.2010 Present: Ms.Babita Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner with petitioner no.l in person. Mr.R.N. Vats, APP for respondent no.l/State with S.I. Roshan Lai, P.S. Punjabi Bagh. Mr.Rakesh Walia, Advocate for respondent no.2 with respondent no.2 in person. +Crl.M.C. 2627/2010 & Crl.M.A. 13776/2010 Petitioner is seeking quashing of FIR No.647/2007 under Sections 498/406/34 IPC registered at P.S. Punjabi Bagh, Delhi on the complaint of respondent no.2. The ground for quashing is that parties have entered into an amicable settlement and pursuant to that they .have been granted divorce. Petitioner no. 1 is present in person and he is identified by Ms.Babita Sharma, Advocate and respondent no.2 is present in person and she is identified by Mr.Rakesh Walia, Advocate. Respondent no.2 confirms that she has entered into an amicable settlement with the petitioner of her own accord without any ijP undue influence or pressure and she does not want any action against the petitioner on her complaint which forms basis of FIR No.647/2007, P.S. Punjabi Bagh. Learned counsel for the State submits that since the parties have entered into a settlement, the State has no objection if the FIR and the proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. In view of the above, I find no purpose in keeping this matter alive. Accordingly FIR No.647/2007, P.S. Punjabi Bagh as well as the proceedings arising out of the same are hereby quashed. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified It is made clear that the settlement between the parties will have no impact on the right of the daughter of petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 to claim maintenance from either of the parents. The petition as well as application is disposed of accordingly. AJIT BHARIHOKE ^ (JUDGE) AUGUST 17, 2010 gm