IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. 48799-M of 2006 Date of decision : February 13, 2008 Tarsem Lal Dhiman .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents *** CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL **** Present: Mr. Pawan Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Swapan Sharey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. RAJESH BINDAL J. This is a petition for direction to respondents No. 1 to 5 to register a case against respondents No. 6 to 8 under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab states that the present petition is not maintainable in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. and others 2008 (1) RCR (Criminal) 392. Once in terms of the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court, the petitioner has effective alternative remedy under Section 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure this Court would not like to interfere in the matter in its extra ordinary jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed, however, with liberty to the petitioner to avail of his alternative remedy in accordance with law. February 13, 2008 (Rajesh Bindal) Pka Judge