IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2009 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 10158 of 2009(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MAJEED @ ABDUL MAJEED, S/O. SAIDU AGED 50 YEARS, ARACKAL HOUSE, MAMBRAM DESOM, KALLUR-THEKKUMURY VILLAGE, ERAYAMKUDY P.O., MUKUNDAPURAM TALUM, THRISUSR DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1 DISTRICT REGISTRAR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. SUB REGISTRAR, SUB REGISTER OFFICE, ANNAMANADA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRCT,. 3 VILLAGE OFFICE, KALLUR-THEKKUMURY VILLAGE, KALLUR-THEKKUMURY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.10158 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2009. JUDGMENT The complaint in this writ petition is regarding the refusal of the 2nd respondent respondent to register Ext.P4, a document executed by the petitioner alienating the property mentioned therein. 2. The learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that it requires to be verified whether the transfer was in violation of the covenants in the Patta, that was issued to the petitioner. According to the petitioner the land originally was assigned to his father way back in 1988 and he inherited the same being the only legal heir. It is stated that subsequently a fresh Patta has been issued in his name and that there are no restrictive covenants preventing him from alienating the property covered by the Patta which is now issued in favour of the petitioner WP(c).No.10158/09 /2/ 3. Government Pleader submits that the petitioner should produce the relevant Patta before the 2nd respondent so that he can verify and if eligible takes steps for registration and to this suggestion petitioner also has no objection. 4. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of directing that the petitioner shall along with the original of Ext.P1 produce the Patta issued in favour of his father and in his favour and on the submission of the same the 2nd respondent shall verify this documents and if he satisfied that the document is liable to be registered, he shall take steps for registration of Ext.P4. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.10158/09 /2/