^7 L /9^/^ i t^ »% 3 Si /ffi ..=& IN 'SS M.P. 3TATE ADMINTSTRATI'/S TSrBUMAL! JABALPUR .^^s O.A. N0. /2000 Appl-icaats 1. 'y. £. « Respondents 1 I-I.P, IiipiK Varglya Karmacnarl sangi'. Shiksha vibhagiya Samiti, Surguja throagh its Senior Vice President Shri P.R. oalsena. aged about 50 years; 3/0 Shri Ran-ijila.i. Dalsena. TCto <Du(+Ci C»V°<U< fewAxAAp"V- S.sit Prasad Shrivastava, aged about 33 years, 3/0 Shrl 3.p. shriv'astava, Assistant Teacher, . P.3. Singhi tana, L ajti'.anpur dlstrlat Surguja. VSRSUS State of ''.tadhya prade'sh Through secretary, Dspartraent of Sahool Eduaati-on Govt. of MadlTya Pradssh "Vallabh Bhaii'aa, BHOPAL. 2. ^fsmT'.fs--^- ,>- -efcary, Scheduled Ca.ste, Saheduled Trlbe and BaetoTard Classes. Welfa.re Deoartment s, Val1abh Bhawan , BHOP-y.1 • 3. The Coramissloner Pualic Instructions, BHOPAL. 4. Distrlct Bduaati.on Osf-tcer, Distrlct Ambikapur. 5. Distriat Sduaation Offiaer, SdUGation d.'.strict Ramanujgan^ S. Distrlct Sduaation Ofricer, Sducation Dlstrict SuraTpur- Qlstri.at Ambikapur. 'RIiSIiXMj APPOIGATION UNOE:R oSGTION 19 OF TH3 ADMXNISTSATIVS TSI3UNAL3 ACT, 1935 311^1 ^>I R-ti* sfgy sb*ll<ft 'aTsci Timww u^ 'TS •^ll*llcl'il, sfll'y'i^. («t<'ii'yy aiT^r xcra? \^J!.^<^-[?i9\]t^s~' "r'wi^ 200 NIHWI %1lch ^t^St' CT^iwgiWHfer SB: Hon'bte Sliri Manindra WWianl Shrivastava. J. ^)*i[<n4trF iTFI^ff ^ l^st <f«itri.x i?3iPOT3n^i 26.03.2010: No one appeare on behalf c|f petitioner No.1, though S.P.C. was earlier issueS. ' Shri K. S. Pawar, counsel forlfie petitioner No.2. Shri Bhaskar Payashi, Panel 4awyer for the State/respondents. Heard. The Petittoner No.2 has nfwed an application on 19-03-2010 bringing on record the cireular date<< 09-02-2010 passed by the Secr^ary, Department of School Education, reviewing the effect and impact of e^r grievances of the teachere have be( were affected by the transfere of S|; Tribat DepartmCTt In view of the subsequent (fevelopment, leamed counsel for the petittoner submits that tte petitton (nay be finally disposed of and liberty may be reserved to the petituners Vp approach the Court, if the grievance stiU survives fbr consideration. In view of the aforesatel circijl made by leamed counsel for the p^t of. However, the petitioners wouU State of Chhatttegarh wherein after rlier polksy decision dated 13-01-1995, an redressed on certain aspects, who ;hoote from Education Department to llar dated 09-02-2010 and submisston tjttoner, the petition is finally disposed be at liberty to revive the peUtion, in case, their grievances still remain ur|redrKsed. In so far as unrepresented p^titioner No.1 is considered, his petition is dismissed fbr want of prosecution.l Sd/- ,' Manindra MohanShrivastava, Judge s [^^^!