1 criap-1446.06 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1446 OF 2006 Anil s/o Shrikishan Agrawal, age 43 years, occup.business, r/of E­13, MIDC, Latur, District Latur. Petitioner versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary for Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2. The Police Sub Inspector (LCB) Latur, Mr. Govind s/o Pandurang Rathod, c/o Office of Superintendent of Police, Latur, District Latur. Respondents ­­­­­­ Mr. N.P.Patil Jamalpurkar, Advocate, for applicant. Smt. A.V. Gondhalekar, A.P.P. for the Respondents. ­­­­­­ Coram: A.H.Joshi and A.M.Thipsay, JJ. Date : November 9, 2011. Judgment (Per: A.H. Joshi, J.) 01. Heard. 02. The FIR describes that the petitioner was preparing or doing repacking of coconut oil under some brand which could be mistaken to be a pharmaceutical or cosmetic product. 2 criap-1446.06 3. The petitioner urges that offence of cheating is not even described. 4. Learned A.P.P. is not able to demonstrate as to which offence is described. 5. Hence, Petition is allowed. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (B). (A.M. THIPSAY, J.) (A.H. JOSHI, J.) pnd/criap­1446.06