IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32838 of 2011 1. Dinesh Singh 2. Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 24.10.2011 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioners in a Police case under Sections 307 and other provisions of the Penal Code is that the opposite party had filed a 498A prosecution while a divorce case was filed by the husband when both sides have been involved in the fracas. The injuries are simple in nature. The husband and the wife have reconciled their differences and are now residing as man and wife. Keeping the last submission in mind when it is duty of the Court to encourage restoration of broken homes and not to break homes. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Begusarai in Barauni (F.C.I) PS Case No. 239 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Snkumar/ (Navin Sinha,J.)