THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR W.P.No.4911 OF 2011 ORDER : (Per GM,J) The This writ petition is filed assailing the legality and validity of the judgment rendered by the AP Administrative Tribunal (for brevity ‘the Tribunal’) in O.A.No.837 of 2011, dated 17-02-2011, whereby and whereunder, the Tribunal dismissed the application filed by the petitioner challenging the memo dated 19-01-2011 issued against the petitioner to show-cause why a major penalty of withholding full pension under Rule 9 of A.P. Revised Pension Rules, 1986, should not be imposed on the ground that the charges were proved against the petitioner. 2. As seen from the record, it is clear that at the stage of show cause notice, the petitioner entertained the present application before the Tribunal. However, the show cause notice was issued pursuant to the disciplinary proceedings on the ground that the charges framed against the petitioner were proved. Therefore, we are of the opinion that the writ petition is premature and the petitioner has to give a reply to the show cause notice and on filing such reply, the authorities concerned have to take decision against the petitioner. 3. Therefore, without going into the merits of the case, we consider it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the show cause notice and as such the respondents- authorities concerned are directed to pass appropriate orders after considering the representation to be filed by the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED Dated: 01-03-2011 ________________________ JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR kvr