IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32787 of 2010 ANIL RAI @ KARIMAN RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 8.9.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The present application has been filed for bail in a case of misuse. The petitioner was initially granted bail in a case registered under sections 302,324,307/34 of the I.P.C. and section 27 of the Arms Act, but subsequently he left appearing before the court below and his bail bond was cancelled on 13.12.2002. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner went outside the State of Bihar to earn his livelihood hence he could not appear. It is further submitted that the petitioner was in custody in other case which was instituted earlier. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner undertakes to appear regularly during trial. Considering the aforesaid facts let the abovenamed petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl.Sessions Judge, F.T.C. Ist. Patna in Sessions Trial No.1057/10 arising out of Digha P.S. Case No.144/2001. The learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner fails to appear on three consecutive dates during trial. AnilKr.Sinha (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. ) 2