1 AO-466-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 466 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 653 OF 2011 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. OF 2011 IN L.C.SUIT NO. 407 OF 2011 Mr. Mohammed Ibrahim Ismail Shaikh ... Appellant/Orig. Plaintiff vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. Respondents/Orig.Defendant Mr. A.M.Saraogi,Advocate, for the appellant Mrs. K.K.Soraan,Advocate for the respondents. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 18th July, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. The original plaintiff has preferred this appeal against refusal of ad- interim relief in Notice of Motion against the notice issued by the Corporation under Sec. 351. Notice of Motion is still pending. According to the learned Counsel for the plaintiff/appellant, after the landlord had failed in getting decree for eviction, this notice was issued by the Municipal corporation. In view of the circumstances, in my opinion, the appeal and the application may be disposed of 2 AO-466-11.sxw with the following directions :- The respondents shall file reply and/or written statement before the trial Court within six weeks and the trial Court shall hear and dispose of the Notice of Motion within six weeks thereafter. Till disposal of the Notice of Motion, the parties shall maintain status quo. Appeal and application stand disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)