.UP 10 2; Draft, local; -n -PA4 -dFX-NORMAL -y -e; dumbp L.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T....R .PL60 .HM6 .HE1 :#:@@ AAA ................L.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T...........J .SP1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA WRIT PETITION NO.2722 OF 2009@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Sati Savitri Swayam Rojgar Seva Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit .. Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents Mr A.A.kumbhakoni a/w Mr A.P.Kulkarni i/b S.S.Deshmukh, for the petitioner. Mr Pradip Sancheti a/w Mr Sanjiv Kadam and Mrs Nasina Theba Don i/b Theba & Associate for respondent no.5. Mr A.H.Palekar, AGP, for respondent nos 1 to 4. CORAM : S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ.@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA DATE : 04.04.2009. @@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA P.C.@@ AAAA .SP2 . Parties have submitted Consent Terms duly signed by their Advocates on record. The Consent Terms are accepted. They are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. (D.B.BHOSALE.J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA