\ m“ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH Ag‘ BILAgPUp ' W 4 ’ 2004 RNO. 4M / Petitioner Mandavi, S/o Late Shri .. b?\Myg' h& ‘2” years, Jhurjuram Suspended Mandavi, Assistant Aged about Teacher, 42 p‘}? m ”a“ Primaxy School Bejalitola Block .. OK Devlopment Charama , Tah 8L'D1‘st : ' Kanker, R/o" Village Chinauri, Block §gK Charama, ’l‘ah 85 Dist : Kanker (C.G.). Versus '1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Home Department of Adim Jati Kalyan Vibhag, D.K.S Raipur~ Resgondents b WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 / 227 OF THE -——\\ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Single Belicia @ M \ / (CG) / / ’ The Collector, Kanker Dist : Kanker (C.G.). “’47 / The Commissioner, Tribal Development Chhattisgarh, ‘ XI-HC—78 WW,Wra, Wap- Mo. 4— mm attest W (“Lyaaem W WP £m4 m zoo ' Shfi Sudhir'Agrawal, Panel Heard. Learned counsel for the pt application No. 338/2000 was pe Tribunal , Bench at Raipur. He State has been filed in the said limited prayer that this writ petitim call/transfer the said original appli is pending as the matter stands abolition of the SAT. and there i matter to this Court, as the matter manner. State does not oppose this Iii The prayer is allowed. Let records of 0A. No. 33 Court. .I‘he petition stands finally d Certified copy asper rules. Lawyer for the State. :titioner submits that the original nding before State Administrative further submits that the return of original application. He makes a 1 be disposed of with a direction to cation hom S.A.T. or whereever it transferred as per the Act aiter s no impediment in transfering the s are to be transferred in a routine nited prayer. 8/2000 be transferred to the High Lsposed of. / Sdl- l Kumar 5mm sum Judge 311%? mm E221 311%?1 WE? 3W Ef‘ga W W rm??? 1¥ 1%6m $ W am??? 10.02.2005 Shri Rakesh Antony, counsel for the petitioner.