WP(C) 5148/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE Asok Potsangbam Heard Mr. P.P. Baruah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. G. Soren, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. Pursuant to direction given by this Court on 27.9.2010, the learned Gove rnment Advocate Mr. G. Soren has produced a Notification dated 17.7.2010 issued by the Deputy Secretary to the Government of Assam, Panchayat and Rural Developm ent Department. The petitioner approached this Court for a direction on the allegation t hat the concerned B.D.O. despite being a Joint Operator of the amount deposited in connection with the IAY, refused to construction and as a result the amount e armarked for the petitioner under IAY could not be released by the bank. Contrar y to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is indic ated in the Notification dated 17.7.2010 as referred to above that the release o f the IAY amount shall be allowed on advice of the J.Es/E.O.s concerned and the aforesaid J.E.s/E.O.s is to countersign in the joint account opened in the name of the beneficiary. In view of the aforesaid Notification, the role of the BDO in the entire exercise, is ruled out. The petitioners are directed to approach the concerned J.E.s/E.O.s for countersigning in the joint account in terms of the Notification dated 17.7.2010. It is made clear that once the petitioner approach the concerned J.E.s/E .O.s as directed above, the concerned J.E.s/E.O.s shall give the necessary co-op eration. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition stands di sposed of. Copy of the Notification dated 17.7.2010 shall be form part of the recor d.