Criminal Revision No. 623 of 1998 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. Criminal Revision No. 623 of 1998 Date of Decision: 30.01.2008. State of Haryana …Petitioner Versus Bishan Singh alias Bishna and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Manmohan Sikka, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the petitioner. None for the respondents. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) In the present case, occurrence has taken place on 10.2.1997. The Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jind, found that in the challan, there is not a sufficient material to connect the respondents with the alleged crime. He also found that the investigation was also done in a callous manner. It was further observed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, as under:- “......The lack of wisdom in conducting the investigation would become more obvious from the statements of the witnesses allegedly recorded in the present case under Section 161 Cr.P.C.” Criminal Revision No. 623 of 1998 2 Besides the above observations, it will be apposite here to reproduce para 8 of the order:- “8. Another important aspect to be noted is that the description given in the complaint made by Ramphal which is the FIR in this case, does not fit with the appearance of the accused persons who have been produced before this Court. The police tried its best to incorporate similar description but without success”. I have heard learned counsel for the State and perused the record. Perusal of the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge shows that the same is well reasoned and no interference is called for. Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge January 30, 2008 “DK”