1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Second Bail Application No.10754/2010 Sita Ram Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 9.12.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Rajeev Surana - for the petitioner Mr NR Saran, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after rejection of first bail application charge sheet has been filed. There is nothing to connect petitioner with the incident. Petitioner was travelling in Indigo car and based on that he has been implicated otherwise call details does not show that any call was made to truck driver. Thus, petitioner may be granted bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. He submits that quantity of contraband recovered is of commercial nature and that petitioner and Sukhram were escorting the truck containing contraband thus they were found there at the spot. Looking to the aforesaid and other material petitioner may not be granted bail. 2 After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, bail application is dismissed. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma