IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-29283 of 2009 O&M) Date of decision:21.10.2009. Anil Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. S.S.Sangwan, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. Crl. Misc. No.52900 of 2009 Allowed, as prayed for. Crl. Misc. No.M-29283 of 2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner states at the bar that, as per his instructions, it is a case of one time absence of the petitioner - Anil Kumar. He further assures that the petitioner would never ever absent from the Court. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. S.S.Pattar, Sr. DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the State. This petition shall stand disposed of with a direction that on his entering appearance before the learned Trial Court, the petitioner shall be admitted to bail to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. However, if he absents on any date hereinafter, the learned Additional Sessions Judge shall be entitled to cancel his bail and pass further orders in accordance with the law. Disposed of accordingly. October 21, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE