IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT FRIDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2008 / 14TH POUSHA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3872 of 2006(D) ------------------------------- CRA.447/2005 of SESSIONS COURT, THRISSUR CC.969/2001 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, IRINJALAKUDA .................... REVN. PETITIONER: PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED ----------------------------------------------- T.K.RAJEEV, S/O. THAZHATH KUTTAPPAN, MANNAMPETTA, AMBALLUR, MUKUNDAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SAJEEV RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------- 1. T.L.TONY, S/O. THEKKUMPPURAM LONAPPAN, MANNAMPETTA, AMBALLUR, THRISSUR. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. GIKKU JACOB R1 BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH CHAKYAT THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.R.P.No. 3872 of 2006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of January, 2008 O R D E R This revision petition is directed against the concurrent verdict of guilty, conviction and sentence in a prosecution under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. Both the petitioner/accused and the respondent/complainant have entered appearance before the Court. It is now submitted that the accused has been arrested. He faces the sentence of imprisonment till rising of Court. There is a further direction that he must pay an amount of Rs.62,000/- as compensation and in default to undergo S.I. for a period of two months. 2. The accused is now in custody, it is submitted at the Bar. It is further submitted that an amount of Rs.62,000/- has been paid by the accused to the complainant and the complainant has received the same in full satisfaction. 3. It is for the complainant to report that fact to the learned Magistrate. If it is reported to the learned Magistrate by the Crl.R.P.No. 3872 of 2006 2 complainant and the learned Magistrate is satisfied about that submission that an amount of Rs.62,000/- has already been paid, the learned Magistrate shall forthwith direct release of the accused from custody as he is not liable to undergo the default sentence thereafter. Insistence on deposit of compensation amount need not be made as the direction is only to pay the amount to the complainant. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner accepts that this revision petition can be dismissed with the above observations. Request is accepted and this revision petition is dismissed. 5. Hand over the order. (R. BASANT) Judge tm