1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1614 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3528 OF 2008 Vilas Gangadhar Ghatge ........Appellant versus Smt. Yogita Vikas Ghatge & ors........ Respondents. Mr. Amit Sale adv. for the Appellant Mr. Tushar Pimple for respondents 1 and 2. Mr. S.G. Thorat adv. for the respondents 3 and 4. CORAM: A. P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 7th JANUARY, 2009. P.C.: Not on Board. Mentioned. 1. The learnd counsel appearing for the respective parties i.e. the appellant ( original claimant no.3) and respondents 1 to 4 are present. The respondent nos. 3 and 4 are represented by Power of Attorney holder who is near relation of respondent no.3. The learned counsel has placed on record consent terms duly signed by the parties and their advocates. The parties who are present in the court admit the consent terms to be true and correct. The dispute primarily relates to a apportionment of amount of compensation awarded by the MACT to the claimants. The parties have resolved the dispute by entering into settlement which is reflected in the consent terms. A joint request is made 2 for disposal of the appeal in consent terms. The Appeal is disposed of in consent terms. The award passed by MACT stands modified in accordance with the consent terms. Appeal is thus disposed of. Power of attorney is taken on record. 2, Proportionate refund of the court fee as admissible under the rules, be made over to the appellant. (A. P. DESHPANDE, J.)