BEBORB^THESy.E.S'I'A^ ^DMlN^;^^ :0,.i®;?MO^.. ^/SOtO: AppiiieaNT:- Ra31ieBl-iyamii!aget3,9^'SeaES: •S^e ThaKuE^SRam; Bharaya yillage^—sgango,.Er['ahsi;3- Dd.stt. KdrBa': '(M.'E. )•:• . VERSHS'' KESPQHBE1SITS;- (l-:)::' .:,S:^te;'o£ivMVP.:.:', ^-,T:;'~.::' ; Tbr<3u.gti;i®eei?e'tiar'y,. SeKe3ti].ea. 'Eri'bes' and ;- SGhecliul^d'Gagtes'...'. Deye^0Emen-t;;'li)Spartmenit, •ya]-labK^.Ehawan, 'BK<3p.a'].:.l'C.tI.'E':.)^," The C&ltetrt&F:, Tri.bal, .Helfare. and DevelGpntenKV.:;; Bllaspiir (M.P>) Bloek, Educa-tibn Officer, Pcincti'-BpEeisa^ .^ ~ :; Dist€. BiraSECTF :(M.E.) assd.stan-fc^gimnlssij.oner, SESSiSS^SaSSSSx^.anS'^ ,- B|iSli:aS!@||jc||jB<IBSi1^- ^ HIGH COURT WCHHATTISGARH: BU.ASPIUI Sinate Bench: Hon'bte Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava. J. Applfcant Respondents WRTT RETmON (S»N0^2S3tt005 Radheshyam Veraus Slate of M.P. and others Present- Shri S.R.J. Jaiswal, counsel for the peBtioner. Shri Amnd DubeKPariei Lawyerlbr the State. <»ljM.ORDER ', •" (PassMi.on tt rawtiaioMlareh, SSyW) VWththe consent ofteamed counsel (w ttie partjes, <he peUion is heard finally; ff) By V^peWvm, ftSGSm^ c^i^^gu^w^^^^ ofwder dated 07-04^999 (Anne^reA^jx^gd^by|iK|^{^ Dsvetoplrienf, Bilaspur, by whreht theLserwc^trfjttie pe^^ other Assislant Teacherehave been tenninsrted. Vkte ontor dstod 0&0&-1888 (Annaxure A-1), petittonerw^^potntedasLo^^ TribalWeWareJorColteg^Bitepyr^RrtiBonBrji^ betonggingto<Bhari^WI^P«U|^^ Certifteate to that rffect ws»ateo issuad by tt» ib Tchsikto, Katghora on 26<7-1986 (Annexyre A-18^ t^ to "aiaria" trtoe and resident of Vil^ei-Bargo, Te|»tKal^hora,^ ^ Ktepur. After about 2 & % yeare of hs^^^ show cause nciUce on 15^499^ (AnnaaireR^issuedjythe CoUector, Bilaspur, tBqirirti^l Ihe petUonertq diov»ca^ sg toj^ not tem'iinated, as yponenquiry.ilwasfoundttiatttiepi^o^rprocui^gw^^ &S. -^- 1. on ths basis cf fatee certBicate <rf he bdWH^ to 'Bhgra" tribe whereas peBlicmr ca^e is "Bhoila" sutiicaste of caste Itoslrta" manly engaged hi the vocatton of weavii^). The sad noBces^tod thrt ttw peBjoner WM tWrie to be punjshed under l^l^ Pradesh Ch^ Senncas (Cfe^ifl^^ Cpnfrol & Appeal) Rutes, 1966, jn acldafon to aim^a^^ the sald notk»,1 reply; alt^ «W:syppp»^docu^ the peUUoner. P^iUonersulwntUBd number of documenls to esfaAlish tftrt peWpnerbetongs to "Bharia" tribe. PeUtioner ptaced retonce on documents (Armexure A-4 to A-23) in order to demonstrate that a vaS«Sat»djg®pwca^ certificatB was issued in his favour by ,Uie CCTnfietent aidftwtty in view of the yarious dhBCtkms and ingbiictfons of ihe gpveinmCTrtandttwotherauU^^ and otherdistrict level authoriBes. ^) Thg CoBigritoEigs^jhglig^ngidjM^ onO (Armwure fivZ), ^^ich,sa^esofttieg9||K)neral|an|95^^ been tonninatedl;^ hoM|sg ferthB ex|)tanaflon and tt was fbund thattto peW^^iateety dajmed Wmse^ v^ierare he does not belqng to <he sakljh'toe.B^theimpugnedordw, the CoUector ontered to r^[| |j:rifflinalca»Bjaga^the^ sakl oretor of terminafi^.peBBtmergFgfarrediuv^ 18-04-1899^nexyreA-25),pnw^HA,npadionw»talcen. (4) l.wa^^ M»^^^^p« ^nw^iy^^V^ are Bl^pl v^c^jifflsfcBw an((a^ in utter viptafion ofprinaptes of naturalJusUcean^wUhoirtduegoi^^ pl*»don ncorel bythe w. tt s'alSo aqyied Ithatjn view ^ Bie judginwrt oflhe Sivrema Court bi fte case of Xu. Wadhunf Pfitt aml imaMwr V9. AdcMwuf CommhstoMr, ^fSKSSs 3- TrtWDevaftipin^ a^ t^ws.JW fS|C S.& 9<, tt^ or his •ub- ordinatas" had no auBiprily to hold and snquify into the caste status <jf ttw peWpner asjBie^lStE^Li^C^i^JSc^ hadjuriBtMctton and cCTpetoncfftoh^jgigh^aniBrgi^ achal status of tt^ pdUoner. In hiss>ybmi«Hon,ifjtall,therawas any such TOmpteint,th9 matter ought to have been referred to 9»Stat? Lwel (^te @ Onth^ other hand, teanied coun^ftN'therespiBncl^aubr^ peUlroner procured apiioirttojert of As^^ant Teacher whfch was resenred for Schedutod Tribe candkiate, thpugh tt»eRefflioiw cBd not.belong to "Bharia" tribe. It fe submitted th^ttwgc^mmertteaied im orderon M-05-18M (Annexure R^) to the CoBector, B^spur to ta^e adSon a^At^ those who are fe^ly (^imlng stat^ irf l^ana" Wbg jn said order, the Coltectw was directied to taka actkNn ft>r cameUatfon of csste CCTUficate issued in favour ofthose perec^ji^ b^lwigid to 'WwrB", sub<i»te <rf caste ^oshte" butobtaln^ fabe certNfeatBS dactaring Uiem a»belonging to 'Bharia" tribe. Thereafta^ths Syb I^VBtoiiial pfl^er ^ Ksitnhora submitted a rep(^gn,2&^0-4j^|(^uig||[ure R^to Ihe^C^^ itwas stated Uiat 19 cases of sudi fatee daim were found. A fet of 19 pwons whom the S.D.O. has found not belong^ to Waria" tribe, was annexad atong •wtth the sald CTigutiy report (!iiitedJ^1|^J99^^ R-1). This Imsluded the nanre of the gdiUonerdso. 71wiw|te^^ Congmfe^j^^ directed the Cottector vide his mamo datod 3(M)1-1999 (Annmaire R-2) to terice acfen aflainstthfse 19 Assistant Taadwi? by tenninatmg their peivfow.who fcdsaly >. It is submitted that a show cause nofcia was gh»n ai ^- 'teA&wnclustonthatawpjrtWonwdid^^b^ Vil .-?-^."^ «*wereutermmated.? n (B)" -1 have cwisidered m«lsutMi'nissiwis madte fey teamed counsel for the •»*paftiw^andpeneed the reconte. «»^"ttfe no Id^er resjrrtsgg,jn ^BUfjrfthiss^MhBdlejg^lpwlipnJhat the 3ri "^.t'ri^^-A^''^:; '*:^-l:'::'''fl'^ "^l-;-*^^ to detennine caste slteihB yeste pnlyjvUi th»Stete Leyel'C^sto iinth* te'Madhuri Patil ^upra). If jhws iwas a(iy <)c>ul|t,w ccinplajrt wKh «'N|g8giM B|a^>'!rta|tts«fMhs'^)e^oQe^ <tfJh® »ft^h^'JpeSltoi!ief,' 'wssiot S saS^^'. st;^'*al^;:^;--^;^:s«E»*'"''"a TO(atttift«^^ttgt^BlBion«to1|ijS.S1^,Lw^^ <BF eensidsrafon aricl net to wyrp Jyiisdicdonjo (tocide the 'J^;^^^;L^l^^^^^^^^'^^l^^?^'-;"^^:?:^^'J'^'^^^r^:^:Ml^^:^^^^:^l?£'^ -'" '/~^-^':" J-\":^"" ' ^^^-•^.—.":1;^- ^ • ^- "Issu^fopwhidi, he had hocompetence. <ft) OmseciuaiUy;, lainurabl(^^plj^U^ dated OT^M-1996 {Anii®<ureA-2).|H»sB^II^U%» Coltector, BUsBpur and the same is dedared Btogal and is heretsy §rtaade. The respondeiA-Coltector is direct8d to rrfer the casa <rf Ihe pdlUoner to tta Stete L.wel Caste ScruUny Committee for determination of p^ti^ner's caste stadu». The CoNector shall make such rrference to the State Lwel Caste ScruUny Ctmimahe at the earijost and not later than one month from the dats of rece^rt ofa cqay d tWs order. If tt ts ulUmate^ foundthat the peWpnerbelongs to "Bharia" trN»e,re|ponderts shaH rein^ate the F<dUoi^in^eiwce;w^aU:oqnag^^ pay, paria and senlority. As the pettione^isoirt ofemph^inent dijciB 07^-1888,11 is cBrectBd that the Slata Levd Casto Scn^w ^<SB'tlJtteS sha!ICORCIUC*e te enquiiy in the (Sase of the peti^nar ^ ea<pec|Bot^ |^,po^^ |nd aN encfewour ahal be .^: UMtt r made to comptete thesame jinthin aperipd ofsix monah»si|,rt)]|B^Utojc<>^>eraflon bythepetiUoner. O) In view offoreflioing, th| RiaBtfon is a||QW>^tt»eiifertin(BE»|^l(l»y». Thereshall be no ontere as to cost Sd/- Manindra Mohan Sfariyastava Judge ^<~'--