1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.215 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.497 OF 2010 Shalini M. Khanchandani )..Appellant Vs. M. C. G. M. )..Respondents ---- Mr.Prashant P. Surve for the appellant. Mr. J. J. X’avier for the respondent/Corporation. ---- Coram : R.S.MOHITE,J Date : 15th February, 2010 PC 1 Advocate for the appellant states that he will not press this appeal if the time for making the application granted by my order is extended. It appears that after my order dated 27.8.2009 the present appellant preferred an application for regularisation but instead of approaching concerned authority he has approached the authority which is not concerned with regularisation. Advocate for the respondent/Corporation states that B.M.C has no objection if the application for regularisation is re-submitted to the Executive Engineer, Building Proposal (Western Suburb) H & K West Ward (Bandra). In the circumstances, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. It is directed that BMC will maintain status-quo as of today for a period of six weeks from today. In case the appellant makes a proposal for regularisation to the Executive Engineer, Building Proposal (Western Suburb) H & K West Ward (Bandra) within six weeks from today, then the said 2 department/authority will decide the said proposal for regularisation on merits within a period of 8 weeks from the date of the receipt of the proposal. The said proposal will be decided after hearing the appellant through his Architect and will be disposed off by a reasoned order. In case the order is adverse, the same will not be implemented for a period of 2 weeks from the date of communication of the said order upon the appellant or his Architect. Appeal stands disposed off. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.497 OF 2010 As the main appeal is disposed off, Civil Application does not survive and stands disposed off accordingly. (R.S.MOHITE,J) 3