IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11857 of 2010 PRATIMA SINHA, W/O DR. S.N. SAHAY, R/O MOHALLA- KHANKA, P.S.- KATIHAR, DISTT.- KATIHAR, A SUPERANNUATED EMPLOYEE AS READER FROM M.J.M. COLLEGE, KATIHAR. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, LALU NAGAR, MADHEPURA. 4. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA. 5. THE REGISTRAR, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, LALU NAGAR, MADHEPURA. 6. THE REGISTRAR, L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA. 7. THE FINANCE OFFICER, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, LALU NAGAR, MADHEPURA. 8. THE FINANCE OFFICER, L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA. 9. THE PRINCIPAL, M.J.M. COLLEGE, KATIHAR, A CONSTITUENT UNIT OF B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, LALU NAGAR, MADHEPURA. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 28.7.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and respondents no.5 and 6. It is submitted that the petitioner retired on 31st of December, 2008 from the post of Reader while working under the respondent-B.N. Mandal University. The grievance of the petitioner is that the amount of group insurance as also the deferred D.A. is outstanding to be settled by the L.N. Mithila University. Rest of the grievances, as highlighted in this writ application, are to be settled by the respondent-B.N. Mandal University. Learned counsel appearing for both the respondent- Universities submit that neither the claims of the petitioner are clear nor the averments made in the writ application. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the 2 petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file separate representation before the Registrar, B.N. Mandal University (respondent no.5) and the Registrar, L.N. Mithila University (respondent no.6) with regard to the respective claims. In case such separate representations are filed with regard to the respective claims stating distinctly the details of her unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the representations of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representations, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)