IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1645 of 2010 1. RAMGARHI SINGH S/O LATE JAI NANDAN SINGH R/O VILL PREMTOLA , P.O. RAMPUR DIARA, P.S.MANER, DISTT-PATNA, AT PRESENT POSTED THE B.M.P.16, AS A.S.I.AT PHULWARISHARIF, DISTT- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ,THROUGH THE SECRETARY OF HOME GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR,PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE GOVT.OF BIHAR,PATNA 3. THE DUPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (NORTH DIVISION) MUZAFFARPUR,BIHAR 4. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POICE (CENTRAL DIVISION) PATNA,BIHAR 5. THE ADDL. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE PATNA,BIHAR 6. THE SAMADESTHA (COMMANDANT), BIHAR MILITARY POLICE(B.M.P)-16 PHULWARISHARIF,PATNA,BIHAR 7. INDRA DEO SINGH INSPECTOR, BIHAR MILITARY POLICE(B.M.P.)- 16,PHULWARISHARIF,PATNA, BIHAR,PERMANTANT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-RAJPUR PHULWARI, P.O.PURRU,DISTT-PRATAPGARH(U.P.) ----------- 2. 01.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner questions the appointment of respondent no. 7 in B.M.P.-16, alleging that he secured the appointment on a forged certificate of discharge from the Indian Navy. Learned counsel relies on an order of the B.M.P.-16 dated 8.9.1988 and of the Superintendent of Police dated 28.1.1992, that the matter is engaging the attention of the authorities and thereafter he has represented also. The writ petition has been filed in January, 2010. Keeping in mind the nature of relief sought and that the cause of action is sought to be founded on 2 certain orders of the year 1988 and 1992, the Court is not persuaded to grant relief in exercise of its discretionary power so belatedly which may prejudice respondent no. 7 also when the petitioner himself has permitted so much time to elapse for which there is no explanation. The writ application is dismissed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)