IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.55089 of 2007 1. BINOD LAL TATAK, son of Late Janardan Lal Tatak 2. Binay Lal Tatak, son of Late Janardan Lal Tatak. Both residents of Mohalla-Sisoura Choura Dakhin Darwaza, P.S.-Civil Lines, District-Gaya. ………Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Rekha Devi, wife of Krishna Lal Taiya, resident of Mohalla-Nawagarhi, P.S.-Civil Lines, District-Gaya. …….Opposite Parties. ----------- 03. 21.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2 and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners very fairly submitted that the matter is right now at under Section 244 Cr.P.C. stage in the Trial Court. In the present application, the order of cognizance dated 13.03.2007 in Complaint Case No. 1357 of 2006 is under challenged whereby the cognizance has been taken under Section 120B, 419, 420, 466, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Since the Trial Court is in seisin at the pre charged level, petitioners are at liberty to raise all these issues before the Trial Court. In that view of the mater, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application stands dismissed. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)