1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 49 OF 2006 IN P.I.L. NO. 21 OF 2006 Janhit Manch .....Petitioner V/s The City and Industrial Development Corporation Maharashtra Ltd. And Ors. ..... Respondents. And Smt. Reshma Ramakant Mayekar and Ors. ....Applicants. ---- Mr. M.B. Shirsat for applicants. Mr. Rahul Thakur for the Petitioner. Mr. S.R. Nargolkar, AGP for Respondents - State. ---- CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & V.M.KANADE, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 22, 2006 P.C. 1. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader have no objection if the present application is granted and the applicants are allowed to be impleaded as pary- respondents in the instant Petition. Hence and for reasons stated in the application, the 2 application is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). However, so far as prayer clause (c) is concerned, applicants may file a separate application if they so desire. Needless to say that the Petitioner and other Respondents will be at liberty to file their replies. 3. Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. (SMT RANJANA DESAI, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)