IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.10578 of 2011 Date of Decision : June 03, 2011. Varinder Kaur and another .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.P.S.Tinna, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.J.S.Puri, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.J.S.Puri, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioners seek a mandamus to direct the respondents to to give them appointment on the posts of Primary Teachers on the basis of the marked obtained by them in counseling in the General Category. The afore-mentioned relief has been sought by the petitioners vide a representation dated 21.10.2010 (Annexure P-8) also. CWP No.10578 of 2011 [2] During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this writ petition stands settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.7759 of 2011 (Sukhbir Singh and others versus State of Punjab and others) decided on 3.5.2011 (Annexure P-9). The present writ petition is disposed of in terms of Sukhbir Singh and others' case (supra). Dasti. June 03, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE