Crl. Misc. No. M-11452 of 2009` 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-11452 of 2009 Date of decision: July 14, 2009 Raju & others -Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others -Respondents Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta Present: Mr. Gaurav Sethi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Anuj Kohli, Advocate, for the complainant. Rajan Gupta, J.(Oral) The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 113 dated 13-11-2008 under Sections 323,324,326,506,34 IPC, registered at police station Shazadpur, District Ambala (Annexure P-1) and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties. Complainant is present in Court. He is duly identified by his counsel. He has filed an affidavit in Court today ( taken on record as Mark 'A') admitting therein the factum of compromise arrived at between the parties. He states that he has no objection if the present FIR is quashed. Learned State counsel submits that since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement, the State would not stand in the way of quashing of the FIR on the basis of compromise. The compromise is in the interest of the parties and after the matter has been resolved by an amicable settlement, no useful purpose is Crl. Misc. No. M-11452 of 2009` 2 likely to be served with continuance of the criminal proceedings, which would be a futile exercise. In view of the above, the present FIR and the consequent proceedings deserve to be quashed in the light of the decision of a Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, 2007(3) RCR ( Crl.) 1052. Resultantly, the present petition is allowed, the FIR and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed. [Rajan Gupta] Judge July 14, 2009. 'ask'