IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33436 of 2008 KAVITA DEVI @ KAVITA GUPTA Versus MAHAVIR GUPTA & ORS ----------- 2. 10.09.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Counsel for the petitioner-wife states that her husband Mahavir Gupta, Opposite Party No.-1 is not acting in terms of the undertaking which was recorded under orders dated 20.11.2007 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 34618 of 2007, Annexure-1 and highlighting such facts petition dated 07.05.2008, Annexure-4 has been filed in the court below. Let the court below consider the application dated 07.05.2008, Annexure-4 in accordance with law and if it is satisfied that the husband, Opposite Party No.-2 is not acting in consonance with the undertaking recorded under orders dated 20.11.2007, Annexure-1 then pass appropriate orders canceling his bail bonds. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)