IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14054 of 2008 Between: S. Haseena Banu, W/o. G. Noor Ahmed, Muslim, Adarsha Vidya Mandir Primary School, Kondapeta, Banaganpalli Mandal, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Mandal Educational Officer, Banaganapalli Kurnool District. 2 The District Educational Officer, Kurnool. 3 The Regional Joint Director of Education, Kadapa. 4 The Director of School Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 5 M.K. Mohiddin, S/o. Not Known, Hindu, Ghouse-E-Azam Educational Society, Kondapeta, Banaganapalli, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ declaring that the action of respondents 1 to 4 in watching silently the unauthorized act of the 5th respondent in running the School under the name and style "Ghouse-E-Azam Education Institution" at Kondapeta, Banganapalli Mandal, Kurnool District without obtaining permission or recognition from the competent Educational Agency, as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct respondents 1 to 4 to take immediate action against the 5th respondent and close down the School run by him immediately and grant such other relief or reliefs. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MD.SHARFUDDIN Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER This writ petition has been filed by Haseena Banu with a prayer to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring that the action of the respondent Nos.1 to 4 on her representation with regard to running of a school under the name and style of “Ghouse-E-Azam Education Institution” at Kondapeta, Banaganapalli Mandal, Kurnool District by M.K.Mohiddin-5th respondent without obtaining permission or recognition from the competent educational agency, is arbitrary and illegal. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the 5th respondent is running a school without obtaining any permission from the District Educational Officer as provided in G.O.Ms.No.1, Education ( P.S.2) dated 01.01.1994. A further submission has been made that the petitioner made several oral representations to the Educational Authority, but her oral representations remained unattended. No material has been placed by the petitioner to show that he brought to the notice of the District Educational Officer with regard to running of the school by the 5th respondent unauthorizedly. In that view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the petitioner to submit a representation to the District Educational Officer, Kurnool, if he has any grievance against the 5th respondent with regard to running of the school and thereupon, the 4th respondent has to dispose of the said representation in accordance with the provisions of law. Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs. __________ 02-07-2008 rkk