IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2008 / 18TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 23826 of 2007(J) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- SREE GOKULAM HOTELS PVT. LTD., HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT NO.49, ARCOT ROAD, KODAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600 024, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR A.M.GOPALAN, AGED 63 YRS, S/O. CHATHU, RESIDING AT 2ND MAIN ROAD, TRUST PURAM, CHENNAI-600 024. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.BABU SMT.N.SUDHA RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. NEELESWARAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, (SPECIAL GRADE), REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NEELESWARAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PIN-671 314, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 2. THE PANCHAYAT COUNCIL, NEELESWARAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PIN-671 314, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, TRIVANDRUM. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KASARAGOD, COLLECTORATE, KASARAGOD. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MOHAMMED ANZAR BY ADV. SRI.M.V.AMARESAN SRI.V.N.RAMESAN NAMBISAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/01/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 23826/2007 J APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE NO. C/1/06-07 DT. 7/2/2007 BY THE R1 TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE STAR CLASSIFICATION ORDER DT. 1/4/05 ISSUED BY THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR (I/C) AND CONVENER, HRACC (SOUTH) TO THE PETITIONER'S HOTEL. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE NOTICE NO. L/653/2007 DT. 12/6/07 BY THE R1 TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4. COPY OF THE REPLY DT. 13/6/2007 BY THE PETITIONER TO THE R1. EXT.P5. COPY OF THE NOTICE NO. C. 653/07 DT. 3/7/07 BY THE R1 TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P6. COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL SUBMITTED ON 23/07/07 BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R2. EXT.P7. COPY OF THE PETITION FOR STAY FILED ALONG WITH EXTHIBIT P6 APPEAL. EXT.P8. COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT. 31/07/07 BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R2. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL. True copy tga PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ----------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No. 23826 OF 2007-J ----------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 8TH JANUARY, 2008 J U D G M E N T Even though learned counsel for the Panchayath sought for time to file counter affidavit, I am not inclined to grant time to file counter affidavit, because I do not propose to go into the merits of the case. Exts.P6 and P7, appeal and say petition, filed by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent are pending. The second respondent is directed to take up Exts.P6 and P7 at the earliest and dispose of the same in accordance with law, at any rate within two months from the date of receiving a copy of this judgment. Till such time as orders are passed on Exts.P6 and P7, the interim order passed by this Court will continue. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) ks. WP(C)N0. -2- WP(C)N0. -3-