IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14643 of 2009 1. ARUN KUMAR SINGH S/O SRI LOKNATH SINGH MOH- GAURAKSHANI SASARAM, P.O. & P.S. SASARAM, DISTT. ROHTAS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION KAIMUR, BHABUA 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KAIMUR, BHABUA 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER CHAINPUR, KAIMUR 7. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER CHAINPUR, KAIMUR 8. THE MUKHIYA NANDGAON PANCHAYAT CHAINPUR, KAIMUR 9. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY NANDGAON PANCHAYAT, CHAINPUR, KAIMUR ----------- 02/ 08.02.2010 Petitioner’s case is that he was selected for the post of Panchayat teacher and appointment letter was also issued, in compliance of which he gave joining in the school. Thereafter, without any rhyme and reason he was not allowed to discharge his duties. A fresh selection process was initiated in which also he participated and he was empanelled with highest percentage of marks. Ignoring his highest percentage of marks and qualification some other persons having lesser marks were appointed. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the forum, which the petitioner should have approached for redressal of his grievance, is District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal. This application is being disposed of giving liberty - 2 - to the petitioner to approach the tribunal by filing an appeal. In case such an appeal is preferred by the petitioner within one month from today, it should be considered and decided on merit in accordance with law within the statutory period. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)