IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO: 614 of 2009 Between: K.Kondala Rao, S/o. Ramayya, R/o. K.Marturu Village, Atchuthapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Bar Council of the State of Andrha Pradesh, Hyderabad, rep by its Chairman & Members, Disciplinary Committee No.IV. 2 T.V.Someswara Rao, Yellamanchili Bar Association, Yellamanchili, Visakhapatnam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the impugned order dt. 4-10-2008 passed in C.C.No.48 of 2006 by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and consequently set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.VENKAT YADAV Counsel for the Respondents: MRS.S.NANDA The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.614 of 2009 Order: As against the impugned order, dated 04.10.2008, passed by the first respondent, namely, Bar Council of the State of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, the petitioner has got an effective alternative remedy by way of appeal under Section 37 of the Advocates Act, 1961 before the Bar Council of India and without availing such remedy, he has approached this Court. Therefore granting leave and liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy of appeal available to him before the Bar Council of India against the impugned order, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 22.01.2009 VGB