IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition 875 (S/S) of 2010 Vinod Prasad Sharma S/O Sri Jagannath Prasad Sharma .. Petitioner. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others ….Respondents. Mr. Pankaj Purohit, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, Brief Holder for the respondents. (Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J.) Heard Mr. Pankaj Purohit, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, Brief Holder appearing on behalf of the respondents. By means of this petition the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment as Assistant Teacher L.T. Grade Hindi (Language), after considering and awarding quality points for his post graduation degree. During the course of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has made a representation (Annexure No.9 to this writ petition) before the respondent No.3, for redressal of his grievance, which is pending for disposal. He, therefore, prayed that the respondent no.3 may be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner by a speaking and reasoned order thereon, and the writ petition may be disposed of finally. Prayer made is innocuous. The respondent No.3 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner by a speaking and reasoned order after considering the judgments referred 2 in the representation, within eight weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. Dated: 23-09-2010 (B.S. Verma, J.) ISB