IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1974 of 2011 DISKO YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 29.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 39/2010 registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 427, 379 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui. The accusation against the petitioner is to have given axe blow on the head of the informant. The injury has found to be simple. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that for the bona fide petty dispute, the occurrence took place and there is no accusation against the petitioner of repeating the blow. It is further submitted that others have been granted regular bail. I see no reason for the learned court below 2 not to give same privilege to the petitioner. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail of the petitioner and disposed off the regular bail application of the petitioner on the same day if the petitioner surrenders within a period of fours weeks. With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed off. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)