IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8204 of 2010 SANTOSH KUMAR, SON OF SHRI DAYANAND PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22/03/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 304(B) and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier the petitioner has been refused bail by an order dated 20.5.2009 and now he renews his prayer for bail after framing of charge. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 18.11.2009 and now charge has been framed and there is a medical prescription to demonstrate that in fact, the deceased had been treated before her death, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Deepak Kumar Sinha, A.D.J. –IV, Jehanabad, in Sessions Trial No. 161 of 2009 (Complaint Case No. 286 of 2004) subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)