1 S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.408/1999. Ravi Kr. VS Krishan Kr.Saini, Adv. & Ors. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.408/1999. Ravi Kumar. VERSUS Krishan Kumar Saini, Advocate and Others. 29.04.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.R.S.Mehta, for the appellant. Mr.J.K.Singhi, for the respondent. ***** This misc. appeal having been restored to its original number vide order dated 29.04.2009 has been heard on the request of the learned counsel for the parties. This appeal has been preferred against the order dated 15.03.1999 passed by the learned Additional District Judge No.5, Jaipur City, Jaipur by which the temporary injunction application filed by the plaintiff- appellant has been dismissed and the learned trial court has passed an ad interim mandatory injunction in favour of the defendant-respondent by which it was directed that the S.H.O., Police Station, Moti Doongari, Jaipur shall remove his lock and handover the possession of the property in dispute to the defendant Krishan Kumar Saini. This court at the time of the admission of the appeal on 22.03.1999 passed an ex-parte interim order directing the parties to maintain status quo. As a result 2 S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.408/1999. Ravi Kr. VS Krishan Kr.Saini, Adv. & Ors. of the aforesaid order, the impugned order passed by the learned trial court dated 15.03.1999 was held in abeyance. After the service upon the respondents, the matter was taken up by the court on the stay application on 01.08.2005 and the interim order dated 22.03.1999 was confirmed to last till the disposal of the appeal. The said order has remained in force till date. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, since the interim order has remained in force for last ten years and the possession of the property has not been handed over to the respondent, I would not like to alter the status quo, which is existing till date. Accordingly, I would confirm the interim order passed by this court dated 22.03.1999 to last till the disposal of the suit. Consequently, the appeal stands disposed of. In the facts and circumstances, direction is given to the learned trial court that looking to the fact that the suit has been filed as early as in the year 1997, the learned trial court shall take steps to decide the suit as early as possible and preferably within a year from the receipt of the certified copy of this order with the cooperation of the parties. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.