IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41307 of 2008 1. SITARAM SHAW, S/o Late Nago Shaw, 2. Kamla Devi @ Kamla Devi Shaw, W/o Sitaram Shaw and 3. Vikash Kumar Shaw, S/o Sitaram Shaw, all residents of Sitaram Shaw, Bhunjawala 106/107, Diamond Harbour Road, P.S. Watganj, Kolkatta (WB) ----------------------- Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ---------------------- Opposite Party. ----------- 4. 18.12.2008. Heard. According to the counsel for the complainant, all the petitioners have been arrested. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, Petitioner No. 1, Sitaram Shaw, has not yet been arrested. They are on provisional bail and are required to appear before the Court, which is in siesin of the original complaint case. Petitioners are present in Court and have submitted that they would keep the complainant with full honour. The complainant is also present in Court. She has submitted through her father that there is a possibility that the complainant may be done away with. In the event of non-arrest of the petitioners, an effort could be made to ward off the fear of the complainant that she may be done away with but having regard to the state of affair, as prevalent today, it would be appropriate on - 2 - the part of the Court entitled to exercise jurisdiction to make such an effort. With the observations, as above, the application is disposed of. The order may be communicated to the Court concerned through FAX at the cost of the petitioners. dk ( Barin Ghosh, J. )