;.^ (^^7^^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREAT BILASPUR fC.G.) y;_ W. P^No. ^fSS-^-/2006 PETITIONER <"' ^....-^ ^.>"^"^ ^•>'^y""\.^ ^.^•^•^'.^' ^x" .'i^.--'' ,..-•• .^:\ ~v>- ^•^^'^"" "^y^ <A--"' ^ ^ RESPONDENTS Smt. Amaravati Devi W/o Late Lallan Prasad Patel Age about 48 years R/o Tarbahar, FCI Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS Food Corporation of India Through :- Managing Director, 16-20, Bara Khamba Lane, Khadya Sadan Connaught Place, New Delhi 110001 Through - Regional Manager Zonal Office (West) Mistri Bhawan, IInd floor Dinshaw Wachha Road, Church Gate, Mumbai (20) Regional Manager, Telibandha Chauraha Regional Office, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA s CJ'P-A/o-L^^yw/ 2( XI-HC-78 HIHWt Sh^ttth 3STSTRT?pr, »Tf)tf'IS,RlMWy ^^.VJ(?J^0.4.%;'^Fj- 200^ 3llcl»lyacn (i^cit^siqiT) sn^r^rls-ii* awsn^T **<!'* gTaTwnfersn^T 5hri S.P. K.ale. counse! for th 5hri B.P. Supta, Advpcate tetkes ,lt re^dy Heard both the counse!. The main qrievance of the st famify pension after the death of who was working as A.6.-ZE in the died in harness on 16-6-93. representations to the responder^t; regarding family pension is not beinj Shri 6upta, fearned counsel the case of the petitioner 'nas al DJrector to the Provident Fund consider'ation. He furl'her submittt by the Provident Fund Commissionei; Learned counse! for the peti as asked ror by the Provident fwmshed by the petitioner. In the cir-cumstcnces, tet submitfed that the petitioner may to the Provident Fund Commission^r same, to which courssel for respond^ heil'eafter ^rafepfhr wwff ff fei^ rfsrezR ^srf^Tan^r petitioner. notice on behalf of resp ^titioner is that she is not being paid her husband iate Lallan Pra^ad Pate!, ^itfice of F.C.I, 6odown, Biicspur, who •, the petitioner made severai ir^ts but the case of fhe petitjoner decided by the respondents. for the respondents, submitted that been forwarded by the Managing Commissioner and it is pending fed that some information was ^ouqht from the petitioner. 'ioner submitted that the information F(jnd Commissioner has aiready been (rned coun^el for the petitioner be allowed to make a representation and he be directsd to decide the has no objection. P.T.O. J 't\^ XI-HC-78 sn^r^rf^rra' awsn^TgOTW . i^^y ^y- Bar\'e '^ T5T':qraRTir, dTfl'M'lfi, Rclltiy qTRCTI Shfll^i ^ 200 3iiq<i ><aw ('i,ci(^<s)^<T) gTaiwdfeTw^r "^, Furld i-faving heard iearned cour^sel the facts and circumstances ofl counsel for the petitioner is ju^l", petitioner is al!owed to make a df of this writ petition and it^ Commissioner' within a period 4 grievances and the Provident the petitioner regarding family from the date of receipt of the points raised by the petition^r, information is required to be be intimated to the petitioner information to respondent No.l, same to the Provident Fund that the order regcsrding family period of 2 months, in accordanc) the Provident Fund Commissionerl With the direction aforesfiid. Consequently,I.A. No.792^ Part'ies are entitied for ceKif *i<ifci41-< Hi*idTfftei^<Ri«i< ^sTl^iTsn^r for the parties and having regard to the case, the proyer made by learned t, fair and reasonable. Therefore, the etailed representation along with a copy annexures to the Provident Fund f 10 days from today raising all her Commissioner shall decide the case of pension within a period of two months 'epresentation, after considering all the ', in accordsnce with law. If any by the petitioner, then same may in Turn, the petitioner may submit the in tum, respondent No.l to submit the and respondent No.l to ensure pension 'is passed within the stipulated i with law, after seeking clearance from ajbhnitted arid Comilnissioner lid, the petition stands disposed of. '/2006 stands disposed of. rtifled copy of this order. Sd/- L.C-Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.