IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21056 of 2010 NARESH RAJBAR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 25/06/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a police case against unknown under Sections- 307, 386, 384, 4436 and other sections of I.P.C., 27 of the Arms Act and 17 of Criminal Law Amendment Act is of grant of bail to co- accused in Cr. Misc. No.14229/10. The allegations by the Supervisor of the construction company engaged in road construction work is of assault and obstruction by members of a outlawed organization who burnt machines worth crores of rupees hampering the construction work demanding extortion. The impugned order of rejection notices that the petitioner was named by the Sarpanch in paragraph- 28 of the case diary as also by certain other witnesses. The order of this Court in Cr. Misc. No.14229/10 notices that the petitioner therein was named by one of the witnesses and the driver of the vehicle who has also named the petitioner. Only in order to maintain consistency in the - 2 - orders of this Court, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.1,00,000/- (One lac) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in S.T. No.194 of 2010 arising out of Dehri (Indrapuri) P.S. Case No.573 of 2009. Both the sureties must be the office bearers of the local Panchayat whose photograph and proof of residence shall be appended to the bail-bonds to be verified through the local police before final acceptance of the same. The petitioner is directed to remain physically present on each date in the trial unless exempted by the court below in its discretion on any individual date. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)