THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.11073 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner claims to be the absolute owner and possessor of the subject building situated at Puranaphool, Iqbal Gunj, Hyderabad. He states that originally his mother, by name Smt.Chandrakala Devi, purchased the same through a registered sale deed, dated 25.01.1961, and thereafter, in the year 1973, constructed a building consisting of Ground + two floors and after her demise, the petitioner has become the absolute owner and residing therein. While so, he states that in the year 2007, the first respondent-GHMC issued notice under Section 452 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 stating that the subject building was constructed encroaching the road and directed him to demolish the encroached constructions. Pursuant to the same, the petitioner claims to have submitted his explanation stating that the building was in existence for more than 45 years and there is no encroachment as alleged. Satisfied with the explanation submitted by the petitioner, the first respondent desisted further action. While that being so, it is the grievance of the petitioner that the fourth respondent, namely, the Tahsildar, Asifnagar Mandal, Hyderabad has visited the subject property and directed him to demolish portion of the building stating that the petitioner raised certain constructions by encroaching the Government land, which is illegal. Hence, he filed the present writ petition seeking appropriate directions. This Court, on 05.06.2009 while issuing notice before admission and granting time to the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents to get instructions, directed the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the property in question, without following due process of law. Today, when the matter is taken up, the learned Standing Counsel, on instructions, has submitted that the respondents will not interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the subject property, without following due process of law. In view of the above stand taken by the respondents, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no further orders are necessary in the writ petition. Accordingly, placing on record the said submission, the writ petition is closed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date:19.07.2010 VGB