CLCON No. 389/2005 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. This contempt petition, under Section 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, has been filed by the petitioner for summoning the respondent and punishing him for deliberate and intentional disobedience of the order passed by this Court dated 2.3.2005, in writ petition no. 1043 of 2003, Jinda vs. D.D.C. Haridwar & others. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent and perused the record. The impugned order passed by this Court dated 2.3.2005 reads as follows: “Heard. Learned Standing Counsel Sri Nand Prasad accepts notices on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2. He prays for and is granted 4 weeks time to file Counter Affidavit. Issue notice to private respondents returnable at an early date. List thereafter. Meanwhile both the parties shall maintain status-quo. Application is disposed of.” Counter affidavit has been flied by the respondent in the contempt petition and Annexure-CA-2 of the same indicates that on 13.1.2005 order was passed by the respondent for mutation. Order dated 13.1.2005 itself indicates that it was passed before the date i.e. 2.3.2005 when the order maintaining status- quo was passed by this Court. In view of the aforesaid, contempt is not made out against the respondent. Hence, I do not find any justification to continue the contempt proceedings against the respondent. Accordingly, contempt petition is dismissed. Notice issued against the respondent is hereby discharged. (B.C.K., J.) 15.04.2009 SP