Crl.M.C. No.2207/2008 Page 1 of 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.M.C. No.2207/2008 % Date of Decision : 17.07.2008 Shri Ram Prakash Aggarwal & Others ….… Petitioners Through: Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate. Versus The State & Others ......... Respondents Through : Mr.R.N.Vats, APP for the State. Mr.Kumar Saurabh, Advocate for respondent No.2. SI Shri Pankaj Malik, Police Station Dwarka. And Crl.M.C.No.2208/2008 Shri Ram Prakash Aggarwal & Others ….… Petitioners Through: Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate. Versus The State & Others ......... Respondents Through : Mr.R.N.Vats, APP for the State. Mr.Kumar Saurabh, Advocate for respondent No.2 along with respondent No.2 in person. SI Shri Pankaj Malik, Police Station Dwarka. Crl.M.C. No.2207/2008 Page 2 of 4 CORAM :- * HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR 1. Whether reporters of Local papers may NO be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported NO in the Digest? ANIL KUMAR, J. * Learned counsel for the parties state that the disputes were between petitioner No.1, husband, and respondent No.2, wife, and father-in-law and mother-in-law, petitioner Nos.2 and 3 respectively. Learned counsel state that the disputes have been resolved and marriage of the petitioner No.1 with respondent No.2 has already been dissolved pursuant to a decree of dissolution of marriage under Section 13-B (2) of Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner No.1 and the respondent No.2 also state that all other disputes regarding the payment of money have already been resolved and a part of the amount as indicated in para 13 of the petition had been paid earlier and a sum of Rs.6 lakh has been paid today in the court by 12 manager’s cheques for Rs.50,000/- each bearing Nos.007593 dated 10.06.2008, 009986 dated 14.06.2008, 029042 dated 17.06.2008, 004395 dated 07.06.2008, 004294 dated 16.05.2008, 007557 dated 06.06.2008, 007893 dated 09.07.2008, 007900 dated 10.07.2008, 009996 dated 15.06.2008, 007865 dated Crl.M.C. No.2207/2008 Page 3 of 4 03.07.2008, 010174 dated 04.07.2008 and 010193 dated 06.07.2008 all drawn on HDFC Bank, Rohini. Parties state that in terms of the agreement, only an amount of Rs.2.00 lakh remains due which is to be paid at the time of withdrawal of domestic violence case pending in the court of Shri B.K. Sharma, Metropolitan Magistrate. Let the statement of respondent No.2 be recorded. Statement of respondent No.2 has been recorded who states that she has received the amount of Rs.6.00 lakh as aforesaid today in the court and she does not want to continue the proceedings pursuant to FIR No.989/2007 under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC registered at Police Station Dwarka and FIR No.759/2007 under Section 380/448/506/34/120-B IPC registered at Police Station Dwarka and any complaints in connection with them and any other proceeding arising therefrom. Parties have resolved their disputes. Petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 were husband and wife whose marriage has been dissolved by a decree of divorce passed under Section 13-B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act. The parties have also resolved their disputes regarding money due to them. Out of the settled amount, all the amounts have been paid except to Rs.2.00 lakh which is payable at the time of withdrawal of complaint under the Domestic Violence Act. Considering the facts and circumstances, it is apparent that no fruitful purpose will be served in continuing the proceedings pursuant Crl.M.C. No.2207/2008 Page 4 of 4 to the above stated two FIRs. It shall also be in the interest of justice, if the disputes between the parties are finally resolved and all the proceedings terminated pursuant to settlement of disputes between the parties. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances and in the interest of justice, FIR No.989/2007 under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC registered at Police Station Dwarka and FIR No.759/2007 under Section 380/448/506/34/120-B IPC registered at Police Station Dwarka and all the proceedings and complaints emanating therefrom against all the petitioners are hereby quashed. The petition is disposed of. Dasti. July 17, 2008 ANIL KUMAR, J. ‘Dev’