IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28909 of 2009 Vijay Thakur @ Vijay Kumar Thakur, Son of Bindeshwar Thakur, resident of village-Jhanjhihat, P.S.-Pupri, District-Sitamarhi. …….Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. ……Opp. Party. ----------- 2/ 03.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is the accused in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 384, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. A dispute has arisen as the petitioner and several other persons have purchased a piece of land from the recorded tenant. It appears that the informant’s father wanted to disturb the possession of the purchaser on the ground that subsequently, he too purchased the same plot of land from the same vendor. The S.D.O. has made a report which indicates that Hira Lal is disturbing the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits in this background that the petitioner has been deliberately made an accused in a case under Sections 341, 323, 384, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the report of the S.D.O. and the fact that there is a land dispute between the parties, petitioner namely, Vijay Thakur @ Vijay Kumar Thakur is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 2 36/2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Sanjeet ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)