IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52542 of 2008 Uday Narain Yadav @ Uday Narain Singh Yadav son of Bihari Yadav, resident of Village-Dhobha, Police Station-Chand, District- Kaimur. .......Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Lalan Yadav, son of Ghurbin Yadav, resident of Village-Chotka Lohra, Police Station-Chainpur, District-Kaimur. ........Opposite Parties ----------- 02 29.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for opposite party and learned Additional P.P. for the State. The petitioner has filed this application under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code to quash the order dated 08.12.2008, passed by the learned Fast Track Court No. IV, Kaimur at Bhaba in Sessions Trial No. 115 of 2005 arising out of Chand P.S. Case No. 45 of 2003, whereby the application of the accused petitioner to exhibit the voter list has been rejected. On going through the impugned order, it appears that in course of argument in Sessions Trial No. 115 of 2005, the petition was filed on behalf of accused petitioner to exhibit the voter list, which is a public document. On hearing both the sides, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-4, Kaimur at Bhabhua, has rejected the application of the petitioner arriving at conclusion that the case is at argument stage and the application to exhibit the voter list has been filed without assigning any reason. I find no illegality in the order impugned dated 08.12.2008, passed by the learned Fast Track Court No. IV, Kaimur at 2 Bhabua in Sessions Trial No. 115 of 2005 arising out of Chand P.S. Case No. 45 of 2003. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Safik (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)