1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1713/2011 (ANIL S. MANKAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH. & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Y.S. Gorle, counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. Mayuri Deshmukh, A.G.P. for the R-1 to 3. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 9 , 2011 . Heard. We find no infirmity in the impugned order passed by the Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati on 15.11.2010 dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioner seeking appointment on the post of Stenographer as he claimed to be the nominee of a Freedom Fighter Shri Shankar Mankar. The petitioner had based his claim before the Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati on his application made to the Collector, Akola on 08.05.2009 for appointment on the post of Stenographer. The respondent no.2, the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati, rightly relied on the Government Resolution dated 19.11.2003, which was based on an order passed by the Apex Court, while dismissing the appeal of the petitioner. According to the Government Resolution dated 19.11.2003, it is mandatory for the establishment to intimate the Employment Exchange in 2 regard to the vacancies and the Employment Exchange should sponsor the names of the candidates strictly according to the seniority and reservation. It is further stated in the Government Resolution that in addition, the appropriate department or establishment should call for the names by publication in the newspapers having wide circulation and should also display the vacancies on Office Notice Boards or announce the same on Radio, Television and Employment News Bulletins and then consider the cases of all the candidates, who have applied. Thus, the Government Resolution dated 19.11.2003 provides for a competition between the candidates falling in a particular category and it appears that the respondent no.2 has dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner as the petitioner claimed appointment on the basis of an application, which was made to the Collector. Since the order passed by the respondent no.2 on 15.11.2010 is just and proper, the writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE APTE