‘; The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Rajpur vide interim oxdgr dated 20,112001 dimmed to maintain status quo’ in regard to the position of the paitioner as was prevailing on 11,102001. By virtue of the interim order the patitiomr i continuing at tha original placg ofpQstizrg, Ba that as it may, with thg paS$age of time this pstition has become in£ructuous as yeriod, of transfer is not applicable forever" At this point ofiime, more is no quostion to examine the vaiidity of the transfer order, Howevets the respondents are at iiberty to pass appropriate order keeping in View the public interest and: administrative exigency, without insieting on compliance of the impugned transfer order. It is well settled principle of law that transfer is an incident of service and it is for the employer to decide as to where a particular ohicer/employee be postedi keeping in View public interest as well as administrative exigency. This Court has limited jurisdiction to interfere in the transfer matter and this Court can interfere only in the case of proved malatide, non- competenee of authority passing the transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity with the rules and regulations, . in View of the above, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. ‘ sir/— ,i i Satish K.Agnihotriv i‘ it r Judge 13 , it ( s H