( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10087 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 20347 OF 2009 Vishwanath s/o Hulaji Harale and others. APPLICANTS VERSUS Shankar s/o Govindrao Khandgave RESPONDENT ..... Mr. K.M. Nagarkar, advocate for the applicants. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 2nd December, 2009] PER COURT : 1. Heard counsel for the applicants. 2. The delay is only of three (3) days. The delay is of marginal nature. Sufficient explanation is stated in the application. I accept the explanation. No reply is riled and none appears for the respondent. Hence, by accepting the explanation, the application is allowed. The delay is condoned. The second appeal be registered and to be placed for admission on 16th December, 2009. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/ca10087-09 ( 2 )