^^C0rZ7Z—- IN THE HIGH COURT_QF'_CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION(S) N0.^^^? /2006 PETITIONER ^ .4s^ ,< y p?v ..••' ^ifS'y \y' ^??^'^ /y>^w 0^ ,•.<>•' ,&" '.te> o^'./'. .-• "'^y •-i' ^ Narsingh Rathiya, Son of Shri Ram Singh Rathiya, Aged about 37 years, Assistant Teacher, Priniary School Barbhauna, Block Kharsiya, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS -0°^ -.-"•"*>-"- .^. '^"'^1^ ("'JV' .<""'»e^<^!^••^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through tfae Secretary, Departrtient of Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Couiraissioner, Tribal WeUare Deparbtaent Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The Assistaat Coiniaissioner, Tribal Welfare Departinent, Head Of&ce -Raigarh (C.G.). 4. The District Coordiaator, Tribal Welfare Departnient, Head OfBce- Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.O.). WRIT _ PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTLTUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OP WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE HKH COURT OF WHAmSGAW AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE NR. SATISHJC^AQ (Ona. J. WRTT PFTTTION (5.1 N0.70^ OF 2006 ^ Petitioner Bharat Bhusan OadsBnu yersus Respondents State of Chhcrttiagarh and others WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0.7076 OF 2006 Petitioner Tarun Kunwr Chandrn versus Respondents State of ChhorMT<9arh ond o-thera wiar PETTTION rs.i NO.TDT/ OF 2006 Petitioner ManehaB' Lal Tiwuri versus Respondents : Staf of Chhattugnrh and oihers WMT PETmON (S.l N0.7078 OF_20Q(& ^ Petitioner Qnprnkash Jaiswal verais ResporKfents : State of Chhattiagnrh and olhers WRTT PETmON CS.) N0.7083 OF 2006 Petitwner Narangh RBrthiya vwsus Respondurhs State of Chhattisgarh and o-thers '^ Petittonw WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0.7084 OF 2006 V^»inChand Raa<ara wrsus Rcspondents State of Chhorttiagarh and olhers A PetrtionBr WRTT PFTmON fS.l N0.708S Ol8 2006 JuNidwr L<rf Yadw versus Re^ondents Stnte of Chhattisgorh and o'thers Petitioner WRTT PETmON fS.l N0.7086 OF 2006 Mnnnu Rom Rurtiiyo verais Respondents : Storte of Chhattiaigarfi and o-thws And wwrr pErmoN fs.ii>io.?wi<y 2006 Mitioner Kanhaiya Lal Sahu versus ,. Respwidents : Stnte of Chhdttisgarh ond olhers Pnssent : Mr. Arfwuni Shukla, counad fer •the petitiener(s). Mr. Suishil Oubey, Sovemnwnt Adwcate for •the Sttrte/ reapondents. OR O E R (Passed on Ihis 2011' cky of December, 2006) Leomed counsel a^eww^ for the petHioners as oldo for tfie State/respondents join+ly submit *at ihe f<Kts md questwn of kw involved in the present writ petitwns arc squarely covered by •the decision of this Court m -fhe case of Yadwwrt- KUIRW Wmwdwoj w. Mwrie^al Corporatlon. Oury ewd awthu^ . -(. 2. For •the aforementionad reasons, -the twit petitions are diaposed of m terms of •the decision of this Court' m •the matter of Yashwant Kumar ffMrodwaj (SufWtt), subjeet to vwification of •the fact aa to wihethw the petitioners hwe acquired B.Ed7B.TJ. Certificortea at their ofm expenses as per the circufars dorhed 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and fur-ther whether they have been paid Iwo advonce incrwnents or not. No order as to costs. < 3. A copy of -this order be placed on -the record of the conneeted wirit petitions. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge 1 2006CII)MPJR-C696 SiMuuh