lN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM OF]DEFI SHEET .„ ..... ey.I.+.t..Petl.lion...(..c} ..... „ ......... „.N8. 17 of 2o0 5 Tashl State Of 20.06.2 05 TAI*ir3+ .................... prgf !yidNKJNfsx I ANf rFifprIN Versus a...Qtherg.„„ ...... Bespondent a i Order with Signature Heard Mr. 8. Sharma, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. 8. Pokhrel and Miss Rita Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. J. a. Pradhan, learned Government Advocate assisted by Mr. Karma Thinlay, learned Assistant Government Advocate for the State -respondents. Upon hearing Mr. 8. Sharma, learned Senior Counsel as well as Mr. J. 8. Pradhan, learned Government Advocate at some length, Mr. Sharma sought for some time so as to enable him to take instructions from his client. In view of it, the matter be listed tomorrow, i.e. on 21.06.2005 for necessary orders. Jhadge Office Note as to action (if any) taken on Order iaaler2:.I DatefofOrder Order wittl Sjgnatule officeNot¥FTaction(jfany)`rq \\ taken on Order 21.06.4t/ •-,"..., eat i.`.LJ-,rEF 2 o5 Heard Mr. B. Sh,arma, learned. Senior couns assisted by Mr. '8. iokhrel ana rdiss Ri-tta Sharm learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. J 8. Pradhan, Ieamed Government Advocate assiste by Mr. Karma Thinlay, learned Assistan Government Advocate for the State - respondents a . some length. At the very outset, Mr. 8. Shaina, leaned Senior Counsel in his usual frankness submitted that the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the State - respondents/competent authority. In our considered view, the prayer for withdrawal should be allowed, and, accordingly, it` is allowed thus +aclosingthewritpetitiononwithdrawal,withliberty. to approach the State - respondent/competent autbority in the matter, if so advised. 1 \- N. ( F.. .Ftftiantry si=gh )ChicJune|Act{n(A.p.Sasba) J59ft±Ld59±