1 ca7614.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7614 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 200 OF 2006 [Parabai w/o Ambadas Ghodke died LRs. Shrimant Maroti Ghodke vs. Kesharbai Rangnath Ghodke.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. A.P. Pardeshi, Advocate h/f Mr. S.T. Ghute, Advocate for applicant. Mr. S.Y. Mahajan, Advocate for respondent sole. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 24TH NOVEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard learned Counsel for the applicant. 2. Perused the contents of the application. The Counsel for the respondent has vehemently opposed the application on the ground that delay of 60 days in filing the application is not properly explained. 2 ca7614.11 3. Upon perusal of para-3 of the Civil Application and explanation offered for delay in filing the appeal, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A),(B) and (C) and stands disposed of. . Necessary amendment to be carried out within three weeks from today. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/NOV11