IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 20843 of 2002 Between: T.Linganna. ..... PETITIONER AND Smt B.Laxmi Devamma and others. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.E.AYYAPU REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SMT.N.SHOBA The Court made the following Order: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “To issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records in Revision Application No.2(39/2002- R.C.-II) ﬁnal order No.86/2002 dated 02-09-2002 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same”. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.26099 of 2002 ﬁled by the petitioners for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. _________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dt:17.10.2008 Usd