THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.3726 OF 1999 DATED: 23.01.2008 Between: A. Adinarayana Reddy .. Petitioner And The Correspondent, National Junior College, Nandyal, Kurnool District and others. .. Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.3726 OF 1999 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a Certiorari to call for the records relating to the Memorandum No.10025/CE.III-2/98-3, dated 29.01.1999, on the file of the 3rd respondent, confirming the orders of the 2nd respondent dated 06.06.1998 and the orders of the 1st respondent dated 27.02.1998, and to quash the same as arbitrary and illegal. It appears, petitioner was appointed as Junior Lecturer in History in National Junior College, Nandyal of Kurnool District, in the month of March 1983, against an aided vacancy. While so, in the year 1997, he was charged with the allegations that, without obtaining permission from the management of National Junior College, he took active part in establishing Sri Vivekananda Junior College and was actively involving in the administration of the said college, while neglecting his legitimate duties, and was also responsible for shifting of said Vivekananda Junior College to a building immediately next to the National Junior College, to create unhealthy competition between the two colleges, divert students and facilitate his functioning in both the colleges. A regular enquiry was conducted, explanation of the petitioner was called for and, ultimately, he was dismissed from service, vide proceedings dated 27.02.1998 of the 1st respondent - Correspondent, National Junior College, Nandyal. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner carried the matter in appeal before the 2nd respondent – Regional Joint Director of Higher Education, Kadapa, who, by proceedings dated 06.06.1998, refused to interfere with the order passed by the 1st respondent and thus confirmed the same. Thereupon, the petitioner approached the 3rd respondent - Government of A.P. and the Government, after careful examination of the material placed on record, issued the impugned memorandum, dated 29.01.1999, dismissing the appeal and upholding the orders passed by both the authorities below. Questioning the said memorandum, this writ petition is filed. Heard both sides. This is a case where the petitioner, while holding a post that was admitted to grant-in-aid, has involved himself in an act, which is detrimental to the interest of the institution in which he was working as well as contrary to the Conduct Regulations. An employee, who is working against an aided vacancy, is not supposed to work for another institution. Thus, the misconduct of the petitioner cannot be said to be trivial in nature and cannot be ignored. I see no reason to interfere with the impugned memorandum of the 3rd respondent under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 23rd January, 2008. IBL