1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.312/2010. Bholashwar Shrotriya. vs. State of Rajasthan. Date : 12.4.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Rakesh Arora, for the petitioner. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner's contention is that he was suspended because of pendency of a case registered against him under the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act. The petitioner has been acquitted by judgment dated 6.5.2009. That fact was brought to the notice of the respondent upon which by order dated 8.6.2009, the petitioner has been reinstated and his suspension order was cancelled. In the order dated 8.6.2009, it is mentioned that for the suspension period, any benefit if is available to the petitioner, that may be decided after expiry of limitation for preferring the appeal against his acquittal. According to the petitioner, the petitioner submitted a representation to the District Collector, Bhilwara informing him that as per his knowledge, no appeal has been preferred against 2 the judgment of acquittal and the petitioner's said representation dated 30.11.2009 has not been decided by the District Collector, Bhilwara. Since the only prayer of the petitioner is that his representation may be considered and decided so that the petitioner may get his benefits if it is allowed to him of the period of suspension, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Collector, Bhilwara/competent authority to take a decision about the petitioner's claim for suspension period. The matter may be decided within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with copy of the representation. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya