IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc.No.30165 of 2008 Date of Decision: 8 - 1 - 2009 Rishi Raj .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA *** Present: Mr.Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Mor, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA (ORAL) Petitioner was one of the 3-4 persons who had entered the hotel and fired the shots. He is seeking regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.922 dated 6.11.2006 registered at Police Station City Gurgaon under Sections 302/307/120-B/34 IPC and 25 of the Arms Act. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it has not been specifically stated that from amongst 3-4 persons, who had fired the shot. The very fact that petitioner was present at spot along with co-accused fasten him with the liability under Section 34 IPC. Second submission made by counsel for the petitioner is that one Ravi was arrested and that he made the disclosure statement that murder was committed by him along with the present petitioner. That disclosure statement is not admissible. It has further been submitted that no recovery has been effected from the Crl.Misc.No. M-30165 of 2008 [2] petitioner. These facts are to be examined by the trial Court while recording the evidence. Counsel for the State has submitted that 8 witnesses have been examined out of total 19 witnesses. Next date for recording of further evidence fixed is 29.1.2009. The trial is in progress. Taking into consideration the nature of offence and role assigned to the petitioner, he in no way deserves the concession of bail. Dismissed. ( KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA ) January 8, 2008. JUDGE RC