~sa~ IGLE BENCH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHA.TTISGARH AT BH.ASPUR • W.P. JS'I N0. '^1511 / 2006 Petitioner / .^.,.-:^ ^^y^- Y^' »>>~ ^.••••' ^-"'' ...--'c^\-^.>" ,^^:^" <i}° x..-<._... ^ . ^'' Respondents versus /2. M.R.Ahire S/o Shri D-R.Ahtre, Aged about 38 years, Occupation - S.D.O.P. K/O urLnoteaonger, Police District - Narayanpur, Dist: Bastar-(C.G-), State of Chhattisgarh, Through - 'The Upper Chief Secretar;7 Department of Home Attau's, L'.K.y. Bnawan, Kaipur, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.j The Director General of Police Police Headquarter, Raipur, Dist :p^p>,y3F(C.G.) fc— The Superintendent of Police, Police, Dist: Nar&ya'npttr. L/ Dist: Bastar-iC.G.i WPJT' PE.TITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 / 227 OF TtjE CONSTITUTION OF 1NDL\ XI-HC-78 'S^^WvPV, »Tfly'16, [clrtltiy WMW vhWch \^f(^)^:&"lt9^^ • ^pr 200^ 3TT^?riT^? (yit^qqET) sn^rqirf^TR; vf» 'sw ??giw:tri?cT3n^T 'WTrft'fffe^rf ^STf^lTSn^T 21-8-2006 coundel Mr. Arun Shukla, Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, Dep^ily respoadcnts, on advaace copy). Hcard both thc couasel.1 By the instaat writ p^t Constitution oflndia, the peti^ioi dated 5-8-2006 passed by transferred from Raipur to Bij^pi Main grievancc of fbe more than five veara in the inade against the policy of th^ inade representation Aiinex(u|e has been doae ia his case. In the circumstances,] submits that the petitioner to respoiident No.l and same to which leamed counsfel has no objection. Haviag heard leamed the facts aad circumstances opimon on the merits ofthe for tfae petitioner is just, petitioner is allcwed to make ^. gnevanccs, aanexing a copy o^ respoadent No. 1 wifhia 10 No. 1 is directed to decide tfae for the petitioner. y Gcwemment Advocate for fhc Statc/ ^titfon under Articte 226/227 of the leti^ioner has questioned his tiansfer order r^spondent No.l, whcreby he bas been Bij^pur. itetitioner is that he has alrcady served Nlaxalite axea aad the transfer has been State GoverBuncnt. The petitk>ncr Iias P-6 to respoadent No.2, but notfamg mftv resp^ndent teamed counsel for the petltioner be aBowed to make a representation No.l be directed to decidc the appcaring for the State/respondents cifrunsel <tf case for the parties, havmg regard to the case asd without expressing aoy ;, the prayer made by teamed cozmsel ^ir aad reasonable. Therefore, fhc detafled repTesentation raisiag aB his this writ petition aad its annexures to .from today and in tum, respondent ^epjeseatatioiioffhc petitioner wifhia a dajrs ilc P.T.O. «t>l<<Ifl<fl-1 HIHflTft' fei^l' tf5|«^|<, ^sri^irsn^r for certjified of its receipt, after considering the [ioner m an objective maimcr, ia 1, the petition stands disposcd of. ^409/2006 also staads disp(»edof. copyofthis oider. , ^:. v-^: 3^ ^WM^, w<S[wf6, Rc-iiwy 3TI^?T<T3W (t^crfgS^T) 3:n^r%rR.ii+ gsff sti^T giirra gTcfrwsfitran^T —^ peiiod of 30 days from ttie da*4 objections raised by the accordance wifh law. With the direction aforesaiti Consequentfy, M.(W.)P.No.| Parties are entitled P.T.O.