IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35323 of 2010 MUNNA SAHNI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.10.2010. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Case No.128(C-2) of 2010 for the offences punishable under Sections 2,7,17,27,29,31,50 and 51 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 . Substance of allegation against this petitioner is of dealing in Dolhpin oil in contravention of the provisions of the Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner, with reference to the report of the Range Officer placed at Annexure-1, submits that on a general allegation made by the Range Officer that certain persons were involved in the trade of the Dolphin oil, that the petitioner was arrested. He submits that no specific allegation has been attributed as to the role of the petitioner in the case. Learned counsel further, with reference to the seizure list, submits that the same does not bear the signature of the petitioner who was arrested 2 on the spot. Learned counsel submits that in these circumstances, the petitioner having a clean antecedent, has remained in custody since 5.5.2010. Taking into consideration the circumstances and considering the submissions of the learned counsel, let petitioner Munna Shahni be released on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in Connection with Case No.128 (C-2) of 2010, subject to the following conditions; (a) That one of the close relatives of the petitioner would stand as one of the bailor who shall also file an affidavit regarding his relationship with the petitioner, (b) That the said bailor would be under a duty to inform the court below in case the petitioner, after his release in the present case, is named or is found involved in any further case of similar nature and whereupon the court below shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioner on grounds of misuse, (c) That the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and would accept the police papers without 3 trying to delay the matter, (d) That the petitioner shall also ensure his representation before the court below on each and every date fixed in the case and failure on the part of the petitioner to ensure his representation on two consecutive dates fixed in the case, without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the court below, would confer liberty to the court concerned to initiate proceeding for cancellation of his bail bond and to take him into custody. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J)