1 wp 7472.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7472 OF 2011 Manoj Shivmurti Swami and another .. Petitioners Versus Manohar Vishwanath Swami and others .. Respondents Shri B. N. Patil, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondents. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 12TH DECEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : . The present petitioners had filed an application calling for the record from the office of the Land Records, Ausa of Exhibit 51. The said application is rejected. Shri B. N. Patil, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the said record is relevant and material to decide the suit. The Court below while rejecting the said application has not considered this aspect. The map of the measurement is relevant. As said record has been taken back, it is necessary to call for the same. 2 wp 7472.11 2. Shri Deshmukh, the learned counsel for respondents supports the order. 3. With the assistance of learned counsel I have perused the application and the order. Exhibit 51 is only a letter issued by the T. I. L. R. stating that record regarding Namuna No. 4 and of Pot Hissa No. 346 cannot be given as the same has not been implemented. Exhibit 51 does not deal with any record of measurement. Even otherwise the evidence of T. I. L. R. is over. 4. In view of the above no error is committed by the Trial Court while passing the impugned order. No need to interfere in the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed, however, with no order as to costs. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Dec. 11