1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.133 OF 1999 -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.A.N.Mulla for the Appellant. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED : 03.06.2008 P.C. This is the Second Appeal filed by the original plaintiff as his suit for restoration of possession on the basis of title was dismissed initially by the trial court by its judgment and order dated 10.2.1989 and later on by the Appellate Court by its judgment and order dated 15.12.1997. After considering the material placed on record including the evidence led by the parties, as the Appellant-plaintiff failed to prove his title over the suit property and failed further to prove that the defendant has committed encroachment 2 on the suit premises, dismissed the suit by holding that the Appellant-plaintiff is not entitled to possession of the suit premises. The findings so arrived at by the courts below need no interference as there is nothing pointed out from the record that the order passed by the courts below are perverse and/or contrary to the record. The view so taken by the courts below, as rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the respondent, cannot be said to be perverse. The concurrent findings therefore need no interference. Resultantly, the second appeal is dismissed. No costs. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.]