THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.8123 OF 2010 Dated 26th April, 2010 Between: B.Ram Kumar and 2others …Petitioners And The Asst. Commissioner of Police, Saroornagar Division and 3 others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri R.Sridhar Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2: AGP for Home Counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4: ----- The Court made the following: Order: (on being mentioned) On a mention being made, the Writ Petition is posted under the caption ‘for being mentioned’. Order, dated 13-04-2010, in W.P.No.8123 of 2010 is modified as under: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.1 and 2 in not acting upon the complaint of the petitioners, dated 29-03-2010, against respondent Nos.3 and 4 with regard to the harassment and troubles faced by the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direction respondent Nos.1 and 2 to take appropriate action against respondent Nos.3 and 4 in pursuance of the petitioner’s complaint, dated 29-03-2010.” After arguing the case for some time, Sri R.Sridhar, learned Counsel for the petitioners, sought for permission for withdrawal of the Writ Petition with liberty to his clients to file a fresh Writ Petition with proper pleadings. The request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is accepted. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.10451 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 26th April, 2010 lur