^ c.. & • \ *3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRIT PETITION N0. /2004 PETITIONER ^:y- *^"'" VERSUS ^ R^,/ Hori^L^I Sahu, aged about 29 years/ son of Swanthi Ram Sahu, r/o. - Chhaprapara, village' Panchayat Jhajhpurikala, block Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Lormi, RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through, the Secretary, Department of Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ,<F*flcy'^fc^-" ,^^e.8*fasp 2. Block Education Officer, Lormi, Distt. Bilaspur (CG) 3. The District Collector, Bilaspur. 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Lormi, Distt. Bilaspur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER / ORDERS, DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS. "ww ff' XI-HG—78 an^( ^il ft-<1'* ^SH Sff^T sh+<fch i--'!; 'TST •*ii<)i<-i<i, s?i;)I.H'is;-fci<ni^y , VsJ, AMo. g^SS/S^N- t-nHriT^Rttrai •f- •BI^ITT^F(' TOfWdfNaii^i 04.01.2005 Shri P.P. Sahu, eounsel for' Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Panel advancecopy. Heard on question ofadnas The petitioner has filed issuance ofa directionto the withia stipulated geriod. He also respondents td consider the petiti eontract teacher in Primary Schpol The case of fhe pefitioneT under Education guarantee schenu the appointment order is filed as said post tiH 11.8,99. As a Schpol hy flie Scfaocjl Edueatian ofthe petitioner has beentermina^ the order is filed as Annexure-P/1 sybinits fhat the petitioner ppsse^ the post of contract teacher. He he has filed a representation b| Lomu/respondent No. 2 but th| decided so far; Leamed counsel ft tllis resfeondent ^(<ri^^^ ^i^^^Js^'d^l^K ^'sffiman^T liepetitioner.. ^awyer for respondents No. 1 to 4 on iion. petition fbr the limited relief of to^decide his representatiQa |)i-a^s for; issuance ofdjrection to the baer for appointment to the post o£ lis.liiat he.;was appbinted as Ouritfif. |i\'i(te,^rderdated 26.1.9'?. A.eppy-of. lAnnexure -P/l. He Gontinued on the conse^uence offhe absorption offhfi said pepartmetit ofthe State, the services (edbyorderdated 10.8.99. Acopy of' i. Leamed eounsel for the petitioner jses all the requisite qualificati'on for ^Lirfher subnuts tbat after terrrunation, sfbre the Bloek. Educa&on Officer, said representation has not been M- tK&petitioner p^ys &r issuaiice c(f ^..^ »1 ^;\\. ::s! E3 Nn Kaas'sii ^^-?TORR[, ^rfRPJS, .y^.No.lilll^^ JT^> an^ii w&-n<(> -It. \/<.*''' dii-ection thatthB said authority may |<indly be directed to dispose Qf Learned counsel ft>r fhe State jtias no objectkin to this lunited prayer made hy tfie petitioaer. The mterest ofjustice will be s^rved, ifthe petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along wj order before the competent authority] directed fo dispbse ofthe same withitf withlaw; , - The petitioner may file a repi^sentation vnfhin a pertod 6f 15 days irom todayi along with a. copy petition befbre ^the con^et^'^uthoi^ and on^ s^ representation beiag filed, the cQmpetent authpnty trioriths fixttn the date pfreceiptofi-ep^eseiitation and-the ordenshaltbe commumcatedto|thepetitiQner. 'niepetilioriisallowed. ^ifflfel'B;i^ll<di 4 ft%t-'<P4*^i< th copy offhis petitiaa and the and the competent authority is stipulated period in accordance ofthis order and co{ry of this bhall decide the same withiri 2 Certified copy as perrules, Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge n^T^D^ T70Mr-^L riR'r'i ^ ^S usw WK IM IIB: :'llffli (IIII ~w- lllil