IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1747 of 2009 SARJU PANDIT @ SARJUG PANDIT S/o Raju Pandit Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ---with--- Cr.Misc. No.3134 of 2009 BISHUNDEO PANDIT, S/o Sarju Pandit Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ---with--- Cr.Misc. No.5138 of 2009 DINESH PANDIT,S/o Sarju Pandit Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 05.03.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Old age of the petitioner in Cr. Misc. no. 1747 of 2009 and the ailment of the petitioner in Cr. Misc. no. 3134 of 2008, being the younger brother, living separately from the husband, and in Cr. Misc. no. 5138 of 2009, being Nandosi, having no concern with the demand, torture and killing is asserted on behalf of the petitioners. No doubt, petitioner in Cr.Misc. no. 5138 of 2009 is Nandosi, having no hand in the incident, even though not concluded, rather doubted. But so far the petitioners of rest of the Cr. Misc. Cases, father-in-law and brother-in-law of the deceased are concerned, the father-in-law appears below 70 years. If he is suffering from any ailment, it is the liability of the Jail Authority to take care of that, but allegation is there regarding demand, torture and death within seven years in the matrimonial house and unnatural death also. Death due to Diarrhea is asserted which can only be taken as defence. That has been 2 not relied by the Sessions Judge even. Thus, the prayer on behalf of the petitioners in Cr. Misc. no. 1747 of 2009 and Cr. Misc. No. 3134 of 2009 are rejected, while prayer of the petitioner in Cr. Misc. no. 5138 of 2009 is allowed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner in Cr. Misc. no. 5138 of 2009 be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Jamui in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case no. 175 of 2006. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)