IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34705 of 2008 SHYAM SUNDER PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 6.1.2009 Heard. The allegation is that the petitioner and his companions demanded rangdari from the informant who refused, upon which he assaulted and was taken to a river side where he was relieved of rupees five thousand and a cell phone. The case has been registered under section 384 etc. of I.P.C. and while refusing the prayer for bail of the petitioner, the Additional Sessions Judge, Araria appears appreciating the finding of the C.J.M. that the facts may constitute offence under section 394 of the I.P.C. Facts of the case appear constituting offences neither under section 383 I.P.C. nor under section 394 I.P.C. The two officers appear not caring even to look the definitions of extortion and robbery as contained in sections 383 and 390 of the I.P.C. Let petitioner Shyam Sunder Paswan be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) 2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Araria in Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 30 of 2008. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )