IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 303 of 2008 Between: J.Thirumaleswara Rao S/o.Venkateswarlu R/o.4th Line, Pandaripuram Guntur. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 M/s. Vijaya Lakshmi Cotton Mills, a partnership firm C/o. Jaya Sai Ginning Mill, D.No. 19-10-136, Etukuru Road, Guntur, rep. by its Managing Partner K.Srinivasa Rao S/o. K.Ramachandra Rao, R/o. Guntur. 2 Sri.K.Srinivasa Rao S/o.Ramachandra Rao R/o. 12-24-8, GAdiyaram Vari Street, Opp: D.S. Kalyana Mandapam, Guntur. 3 Smt.Ch.Lakshmi W/o.Ramakrishna Rao R/o.D.No. 5-96-4, 1st Lane, Lakshmipuram, Guntur. 4 INS Vysya Bank Limited, rep. by its Chairman, Corporate Office, 22 MG Road, Bangalore. 5 INS Vysya Bank Limited, rep. by its Regional Manager, Regional Office, Vijayawada. 6 INS Vysya Bank Limited, rep. by its Branch Manager/ Authorized Officer, 4/1, Arundelpet, Guntur. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue any appropriate Writ, order or direction preferably a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 6 herein in auctioning the property of the petitioner viz., land admeasuring 1865 sq. yards along with sheds constructed in D.No. 1141/1 and 1141/2, Suryaraopet, Etkuru Road, Guntur, pursuant to the auction notification dt. 18.12.2007 published in Eenadu daily newspaper on 19.12.2007 as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently stay all further proceedings including auctioning of the petitioner's property pursuant to the said notification and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded, and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 21st April, 2009 bcj