IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2008 / 14TH CHAITHRA 1930 Crl.MC.No. 1447 of 2008() ------------------------- LPC.6/2008 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, MATTANNUR CRIME NO. 142/2005 of IRITTY POLICE STATION. .................... PETITIONER: ------------ MUNIKKORY GOPALAN,S/O. KUNHIRAMAN MEETHALE PUNNAD, KANNANKODE, KANNUR DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.CIBI THOMAS RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT & STATE: -------------------------------------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE IRITTY POLICE STATION 2. STATE REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI. M.S. BREEZE, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.M.C.No. 1447 of 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2008 ORDER Petitioner who is the 1st accused in Crime No. 142 of 2005 of Iritty Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 450, 436 and 153 r/w Section 149 IPC and whose case was split up and transferred to the Long Pending Register as L.P.C. No.6 of 2008 before the J.F.C.M,Mattannur seeks a direction to the Magistrate to consider his application for regular bail on the date of his surrender itself after recalling the non bailable warrants of arrest against him. 2. The circumstances under which those non bailable warrants of arrest came to be issued against the petitioner are not discernible to this Court. It is only proper that the petitioner surrenders before the trial court and seeks regular bail. 3. Accordingly this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is disposed of permitting the petitioner to surrender before the learned Magistrate and file an application for regular bail within a period of two weeks from today. In case he does so, his bail application shall be considered and disposed of by the learned Magistrate, on merits, preferably on the same date on which the petition is filed after considering the explanation offered by the petitioner for his previous non-appearance. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv Crl.M.C.No. 2