IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.20876 of 2011 Date of Decision.11.11.2011 N.K. Bansal s/o Dewak Ram Bansal r/o H.No. 222L, Model Town, Rohtak and others .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana through its Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Haryana Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. N.K. Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he will be satisfied if the legal notice (Annexure P-10) is considered by respondent No.2 and appropriate decision is taken in the light of Annexure P-1 Rules. 2. The respondent No.2 shall consider the legal notice under Annexure P-10 and pass an appropriate order in the light of Annexure P-1 within 8 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 3. The writ petition is disposed of. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 11, 2011 Pankaj*