IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (0 N0.^5tt$h /2010 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFJBE CONSTITIUTION OF THE INDIA PETITIONER /'fiadu Lal Khute S/o. Shri Bhure Lal Khute, aged about 32 years, R/o. Qtr. No. 12, 9 %l?.AO-^"""^ts Tikrapara Main Road, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.)- S£?-s?S^.--" ^ed.--" VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) ^'^fi v:i'''y ^ ^'s ^^-:^. 01. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (0 No. 5497 of 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Dadu Lal Khute VERSUS Regional Transport Authority & Another WRirPETmQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ESTDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Asnihotri, J. Present: Shri Anshul R. Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner Shri M.P. Bhatia, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 24th day of September, 2010) The petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction to the Regional Transport Authority to consider his application as eariy as possible. There is no prescription in any statutory rule to consider the application within a prescribed time. It depends upon the convening of the meeting and, as such, no direction can be issued by this Court, at this stage. However, it is expected that the respondent authorities may look into the grievance ofthe petitioner and do the needful, as early as possible. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri