[1] SB CRIM MISC PET 958/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 958/2009 VIMLESH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. Date: 18.12.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE Mr. Vijay Pathak, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor for the State. **** The instant criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 01.04.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gangapurcity, District Sawaimadhopur in Criminal Revision No. 67/2008 upholding the order dated 09.07.2008 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gangapurcity, District Sawaimadhopur, by which cognizance for the offence under Section 498-A IPC has been taken against the petitioner on the protest petition filed by the respondent No.2. I have heard rival submissions of the respective parties and carefully gone through the orders impugned dated 09.07.2008 and 01.04.2009 passed by the trial Court and the Revisional Court respectively. Both the Courts below have given concurrent findings against the petitioner and upon careful perusal of both the orders impugned, this Court find no illegality or error apparent on the face of the [2] SB CRIM MISC PET 958/2009 record as for taking cognizance, the Court only requires to see whether prima-facie case is made out against the accused or not, and in the instant case after having satisfied that prima-facie case is made out against the petitioner for the offence under Section 498A IPC, cognizance has been taken against the petitioner and the findings given by the trial Court have been upheld by the Revisional Court. Therefore, the concurrent findings given by both the Courts below require no interference by this Court. Consequently, the criminal misc. petition fails being devoid of merit and the same is hereby dismissed. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/