1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1763 of 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 1377 OF 2011 Cawas Rustom Nazir & Anr. .. Applicants Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Naushad Engineer i/b. Maneksha & Sethna for Applicants Mr.Vijay Patil for Respondent No.2. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED:- 27th JUNE, 2011. P.C. 1. All respondents are served. Mr. Patil, appears for respondent no.2. 2. Heard Counsel for the parties. 3. Office has computed delay of 49 days. However, we agree with the submission made by the Counsel for applicants, that the delay would be only 28 days. In that, the order was passed on 21st August, 2010 2 and the certified copy was applied on 1st September, 2010. The same was made ready on 21st September, 2010 and the appeal came to be filed on 7th January, 2011. Giving benefit of copying days, the delay in filing appeal would be only of 28 days. 4. The delay has been sufficiently explained in the application under consideration. For the reasons mentioned therein, being sufficient cause, and as the delay is only of 28 days, in the interest of justice, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 5. Appeal be registered and proceeded as per its turn. (R.Y.GANOO, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)