IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9648 of 2008. Decided on: 31.03.2011. _______________________________________________ Kewal Ram Verma. … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 4. None for respondent No.5. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): In view of the contents of reply filed by respondent- State, Mr. P.P. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition. Consequently, the same is dismissed as not pressed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. March 31, 2011. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?