IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2880 of 2010 JAI SHANKAR PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 8.4.2010 Heard Mr. Bikramdeo Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kochas (Parsathua) P.S. case No. 89 of 2009 dated 13.7.2009 registered under sections 414, 420, 467, 408, 471 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code. According to the prosecution case, petitioner is alleged to have sold Bolero SLX vehicle to co-accused Dharmendra Singh by forging the owner book and other related documents. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he had also purchased the vehicle in question at Orissa and after using the same for some time he sold the same to co-accused Dharmendra Singh. He handed over all the documents and also sworn an affidavit about the valid purchase and transfer of the vehicle in question. Co-accused Dharmendra Singh has already been extended the privilege of anticipatory bail by learned Sessions JudgeRohtas on 23.9.2009 vide Annexure-2. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. Taking into consideration the claim of the petitioner of bonafide purchaser of the vehicle in question, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand0 with two sureties of like amount each to the - 2 - satisfaction of C.J.M, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with the above noted case, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) M.Rahman