IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS FRIDAY, THE 12TH MARCH 2010 / 21ST PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 7497 of 2010(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MOIDEEN, S/O.MAMMADKUTTY, MATTIL HOUSE, KAREKAD, MELMURI, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.S.A.SAJU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALANCHERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. ABDU RAUF, S/O.ABDULKHADER, KOTTUKULATH, PUNNATHALA, KURUMBATHUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SHRI. P.N. SUKUMARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 7497 of 2010 J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 12th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT Joseph, J. The petitioner has approached this court seeking the following reliefs. “a) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the first respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the second respondent. b) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the first respondent not to harass the petitioner by summoning him to the police station and threatening him in connection with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the second respondent.” W.P.(C).No. 7497 of 201 2 2. Briefly the case of the petitioner is as follows. The petitioner and the second respondent entered into an agreement to exchange properties belonging to them. It is stated that that there were disputes in connection with the agreement. It is further stated that the second respondent is highly influential and yielding to the influence of the second respondent, the first respondent is interfering in the matter. The petitioner was summoned to the Police Station. 3. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that noting that the dispute between the petitioner and the second respondent is a civil dispute, the first respondent will not interfere in the dispute between the petitioner and the second respondent. 4. We record the said submission and close this Writ Petition. (K. M. JOSEPH) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) Judge tm