IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44419 of 2010 SRIKANT YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 02/ 21.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case no.9/2006 registered under sections 302, 307 and other minor sections of the IPC and section 27 of the Arms Act. The specific allegation against the petitioner is that he opened fire causing fire arm injury to the deceased. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the informant is not an eye witness of he alleged occurrence and as a matter of fact, he reached at the place of the occurrence when the occurrence had already taken place and the police had already reached there having heard rumour about the aforesaid occurrence. He further submits that father of the petitioner had lodged Wazirganj P.S. Case no. 177/2005 in which brother of the informant was accused and that is the reason the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the instant case. I am not at all convinced with the above stated submissions. There is specific allegation of murder against this petitioner. Hence his prayer for bail stands rejected. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)