IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 9517 of 2008 Between: Dudekula Shareef, S/o. D. Mahammedsab, R/A Andhrala Area, Near Masjid, Bellary District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Uravakonda, Ananthapur District. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Ananthapur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to For the reasons stated in the "Telegram" dated 16-04-2008 sent by the Petitioner herein, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an Order, direction, or a Writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents herein to produce the father of the Petitioner, namely Dudekula Mahammed Sab, S/o. Alisab, Aged 60 years, R/o. Bellary, before this Hon'ble Court, who was illegally detained by the police of Uravakonda, Ananthapur District on 10- 04-2008 at 06.00 P.M., apprehending danger to his life and set him at liberty forthwith and to pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:TELEGRAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following : ORDER: (per GC.J) Telegram dated 16.4.2008 sent by the petitioner herein to this Court is treated as a writ petition and notices were ordered. In response to the notices, the Inspector of Police, Uravakonda Police Station, Ananthapur District, the 1st respondent herein has filed a counter affidavit stating that at no point of time the alleged detenu was illegally detained by him, that the alleged detenu is moving freely by attending to his day-to-day work and pursuant to the requisition made by him, the Mandal Executive Magistrate, Uravakonda after conducting enquiry recorded the statement of the alleged detenu on 2.5.2008 wherein the alleged detenu stated that he was not detained by the 1st respondent police and that he is moving freely by attending to his day to day work. In view of the same, no further orders are necessary in the writ petition and it is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. G.CHANDRAIAH,J DT.14.5.2008 C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J msv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Station House Officer, Uravakonda, Ananthapur District. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Ananthapur District. 3 2CCs to Advocate General, High Court of A.P. Hyd. 4 2CD copies