IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION No.46 €/ /2oo4 /, PETITIONER 3C) R ag€d Mahesh about Kumar 32 years Netam S/o Shri Shyam La} Netam, R/o Post Modipara, Tahsil Khairagarh Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS 1 The State of Chhattisgarh, /"/- Through Secretary, Ministry of Home, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2. Under Secretary, Ministry of Home Department Raipur. 3. Director General of Police Raipur 4. Superintendent of Police, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA W Xl~HC~78 mm,a%hw,W LO?%6/ 1mm mnim 113300 (7L ww as!W am W21WW5 mmW snésl mm#wm $W 311w 32‘5—2695 ‘fhg mm‘Ter is faken up for hearing. On a men'ricn being madg, . Mr. Par-ag Ko‘facha, counse Mr‘. U.N.5. Dee, (30W. Adv Heard bo‘i‘ #he counsel. By This wrif pe‘ti‘rion 'i‘he g i for i'he-pefi'fiorler‘. ocaTe far +he 5Ta1‘e/respondenfs. proprie‘ry 0f “Fm order dmeé pgTiTianer has §uean Transfarreci The peTH’ioner is working from Rajncmdgaon 1'0 Danfewada. I and he has been fransferr‘ed 'f order dm‘ed 2—8—2004 (Annexur Learned coungel fm' fhe may be aHowéd 1"o make a rap? The pe'fh‘ioner is aiready workir bean fransferred $0 Naxaii’re ur For such a diréci’ion, Chha'ffisgmih/‘r-espondemg has r “Having heard Earned cou‘ fhe fh£is and circums’mnces o make a represen‘ra-Hori 1'0 reap mismg ail his grievances, and decide 'i’he represemm‘ion in an e?i‘rioner' has ques‘i’ioned The iegaii‘ry and 2-8—2004 (Annexur‘e P—1) whereby 4rhe as Cons‘mble in #he Poiice Deper’rmen? ”om Rajnandgaan ‘i'o Dan’rewada vide The e P-i). pe‘mior’ier submi‘rs The? The pefifioner' eseh’m’rien +0 respandenf No.2, because g ie “the Naxaiife area and he has again ea, which is agaiHSiL 'fhe i’mnsfei" policy. T’s.” fhe $‘i‘aw‘e of iear'ned couhse! o objecrion. vise] for ihe pariies and having regard ‘fa fihe case, The pe‘ri'fioner is aiiowed ’m anden’r No.2 wifhin 15 days from foday m fum‘, responden’r N32 is direcfed To abjecfive rrianner wi‘rhin one man’rh from amtW (W) Xl~HC—78 WWW wwgém 111200 5/. anéarm (W) ammw QHW am 311WWm? mmmmst WW#%W f 2" aimanw “(he da‘fa of receipf of a copy o" 1’he same af'i'er considering fhe paim‘s raised by fhe pe’rii‘ioner, in accordame w&1‘h iaw. Wi‘rh The direction aforesaid *rhe' pefifion smnds dispased ef. Consequen‘riy, M.(W.)?.4969/2004 aiso sTands ciisposed of. Parfies are em‘ii’ied far cer’iified copy of fhis order. ,. Sdl‘ L c.BHA°°° ' I Judge