1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 95 of 2008 SEDA & ORS. V/S STATE & ORS. Mr. VARUN GOYAL, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 28.2.2008 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI DEO NARAYAN THANVI,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Learned counsel relied upon judgment of this Court in Kesa Vs. State of Rajasthan reported in 1987 RLW-1. In our view, that case stands on different footing inasmuch as in that case the transferees of the Jagirdar or the person against whom the proceedings for ceiling was pending were desired to be contended to be necessary party which contention was not sustained. However, in the present case after the ceiling proceedings were decided against the petitioner appellant, the land has been allotted by the State to the applicants who have come forward to be impleaded as party. In such circumstances, in our view if the learned 2 Board of Revenue has allowed the applicants to be impleaded as party, it cannot be said that there was any jurisdictional error, or legal error requiring interference in the writ jurisdiction much less in our appellate jurisdiction. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( DEO NARAYAN THANVI ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /sushil/