( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1744 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1744 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1744 OF 2005 IN APPEAL LODGING NO.602 OF 2005 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3531 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO.3487 OF 2004 Mrs.Veena Kantilal Kenia & Anr. .. Appellants V/s Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.Prakash Goria i/by Mr.Y.R.Shah for the Appellant. None for the Respondents. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 26/08/2005. DATE : 26/08/2005. DATE : 26/08/2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellants. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellants are seeking condonation of delay in filing the Appeal. None appears for the Respondents though served. The learned Counsel for the Appellants undertakes to file affidavit of service within a period of two weeks from today. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellants. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) ( 2 ) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)