IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2304 of 2008 VINAY KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS 6 2-2-2011 Heard the parties. Considering the contents of order dated 24-1-2011 contained in annexure-A to the show cause of opposite party no.4, it is found that the direction to consider the cases of the concerned petitioner for regularization as one time measure as per judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Secretary State of Karnataka and others Vrs. Uma Devi, has been prima facie, complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently submitted that the rejection of the claims of the petitioner on grounds no. 2,3 and 4 mentioned in annexure-A is not legal and valid. In contempt jurisdiction it is not found proper to go into the legality and correctness of the order contained in annexure-A. Hence, this contempt application is finally disposed of with liberty to the petitioner that if so advised, he may challenge the order contained in annexure- A through an appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) 2