A. ..•••''!/' ...•% -.••'/y1-..'' ^^^- ^^s^ .••••"'..^yi7\--^'~ ,^0-".,^'' ,^ <?t-y.'...--""' IN THE^TGH COURT QF JUDICATUJIE AT BILASPUR (C.G.: Petitioner Respondents ..... W.P.No.J^t^'^2006 Shrimati Nanda Kadam Damle aged 45 years Wife ofShri S.K.Damle (daughter ofShri Ganpatrao) Boys Primary School, Dangarh, Block Mohala District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus 1. The State Goveniment of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, S'ptla 2. tfeUare DaPartnnt, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Principal High School, Dangarh, Block Mohala District Rajnandgaon Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution oflndia for the issuance of WRIT in the nature of Mandamus certiorari, Proliibition and for any other suitable writ or writs Order or orders, direction w direction XI-HC-78 *11*1CTI Sb*11<*» 3^ ^ll'illd'4, OTflu'ie, Rlitl^^. ^ .^.p.h3?...<^.S:^200 341^1 Md* ('yal^q^ti) 3n^T?irR-i tW3IT^Tsb*fi«ti ai. s^nwflflCTsn^r +i'iiifi'ln-i •<i'<cft'?TisL<ri <fa<^i<. ^airi^iTsn^r 5.7.2006 Shri R.S. Shrivastava, coun^el for the petitioner. Miss Dipali Pandey, Panel| Lawyer fpr the State/respondents, on advance copy. Heard both the counsei. By this writ petition, the pe\itioner has prayed that respondents be prohibited from stopping/recoverindl the benefit of two advance increments paid to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the p|etitioner submitted that two advance Increments were granted to the| quaiification of B. Ed. and now| respondents may stop hn?o advanc| the amountalready paid. So far no notice of recovery petitioner on account of acquiring the petitioner is apprehending that 3 increments and a!so they recovered las been issued or any order has been passed and the petitioner has filed) this petition mereiy on the ground of apprehension. Therefore, this wr|t petition is premature and same is dismissed. However, as and wher| cause of action arises, the petitioner wil! be at liberty to approach appropifate Forum. ____-— Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge ^^ ^ ^