: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.437 OF 2009 Ram Narayan Singh .. Applicant V/s. Aziza Mohammed Patanwala & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. Y.S. Jahagirdar, Sr. Advocate, i/b. Ms. Jyoti Jethwa for the Applicant. Mr. Shravan M. Vyas for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 18 TH DECEMBER, 2009. P.C.: 1. Both the Courts below had held concurrently that the applicant is not entitled to continue in the suit premises. The Suit was filed for eviction on the ground of non payment of rent and that the applicant was a defaulter. The other ground was on account of the fact that the applicant had not accepted the relationship of landlord and tenant between the respondents and himself. 2. Both the Courts below have found that the relationship of landlord and tenant existed in view of the letter of attornment which on evidence is found to have been received by the applicant. The : 2 : Courts below have also considered the fact that the theory that the applicant had purchased the suit premises was not established. The Courts have observed that the correspondence which ensued between the applicant and the respondents did not contain any reference to this fact. As regards default in payment of rent, the Courts below have concurrently held that the applicant had not paid rent after receiving the suit notice of demand dated 29th October, 1998. In my view, no case for interference has been made out. 3. The Civil Revision Application is dismissed. 4. On the application made by the learned Advocate for the applicant, the decree shall not be executed for a period of twelve weeks from today on the usual undertaking being submitted by the applicant and all adults residing in the suit premises to this Court within a period of three weeks from today. 5. The respondents are permitted to withdraw the rent which has been deposited in this Court. .......