IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.635 of 2008 MRS. MANJU DEVI Versus DEEP NARAIN SINGH ----------- 3 19.09.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, when the Court below in terms of the order passed by this Court in earlier dated 3.5.2006 in Civil Revision No. 1850 of 2005 has gone into the issue at length, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the findings of fact. The petitioner having already declared his interest in terms of the order of this Court dated 3.5.2006 in the agricultural property of the family to be 1/6th , the assessment made by the Court below of his being entitled to get an income of Rs. 12000/- per annum meaning thereby Rs. 1000/- per month from that source, cannot be said to be vitiated. That apart this Court would also not find any error in the second part of the findings with regard to income from tuition. It has to be however kept in mind that such issue of determination of such income was limited for the purposes of Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act which is only by way of a maintenance pendente lite and the question of permanent alimony if needed to be adjudicated in the final order will not be in any way affected by any of the findings made in the impugned order. With the aforementioned observations and directions this Civil revision application is dismissed. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) - 2 -