IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1. Criminal Misc. No. M-2172 of 2011 Vivek Kumar … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana … Respondent 2. Criminal Misc. No. M-4292 of 2011 Sunita Devi … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana … Respondent Date of decision: 16th February, 2011 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Pardeep Solath, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Shalini Attri, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the State. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) By this common judgment, Criminal Misc. No. M-2172 of 2011 preferred by Vivek Kumar and Criminal Misc. No. M-4292 of 2011 preferred by Sunita Devi wife of Vivek Kumar under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.18 dated 15.01.2011 registered at Police Station City Narnaul under Sections 186, 332 and 353 IPC shall be decided together. While granting stay of arrest of the petitioner-Vivek Kumar vide order dated 7th February, 2011 and of petitioner-Sunita Devi vide order dated February 10, 2011, a Coordinate Bench of this Court noticed the contentions of counsel for the petitioners that the parties have compromised the matter. Criminal Misc. Nos.M-2172 and M-4292 of 2011 Counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Jagat Raj, Police Station City Narnaul, has stated that the parties indeed have arrived at a compromise and therefore, custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required. In view of the statement made by counsel for the State, it is ordered that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. However, they shall join investigation as and when called for. The petitioners shall abide by the conditions specified under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. In case they fail to cooperate with the investigating agency, the investigating agency shall be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail granted to the petitioners. On submission of the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C., the trial Court shall accept the regular bail bonds of the petitioners. Both the present petitions stand disposed of accordingly. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE February 16, 2011 rps 2