THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Writ Petition No. 1088 of 2010 Dated: 16.02.2010 Between: S.Sudha Rani, Adilabad District … Petitioner And The Andhra Pradesh Road Transport Corporation, Rep., by its Regional Manager, Adilabad District. … Respondents THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No. 1088 of 2010 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the proceedings of the respondent-A.P. State Road Transport Corporation dated 17.01.2006 thereby deleting the name of the petitioner from the approved select list of Conductors is arbitrary and illegal. When the matter is taken up for consideration, it is brought to my notice by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in identical circumstances, W.P.No.1860 of 2006 was allowed by this Court by order dated 01.02.2006 setting aside the order impugned therein and directing to continue the names of the petitioners therein in the panel of selected Conductors. The operative port of the said order runs as under: “Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned order is hereby set aside. The names of the petitioners shall be continued in the panel of select conductors and the entrustment of the duties to the petitioners shall depend upon the availability of work on the concerned day. However, if the transfer becomes inevitable, the petitioners shall be given the option, to choose the places of their choice within the region.” Learned counsel appearing for the Corporation has not disputed the fact that the writ petitioner is also similarly situated. Accordingly, following the order in W.P.No.1860 of 2006, the impugned order is hereby set aside and the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the directions in W.P.No.1860 of 2006 dated 01.02.2006. No costs. _____________ G. ROHINI, J. Date: 16.02.2010 B/o KLP