Civil Revision No.6800 of 2010 -: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6800 of 2010 Date of decision: November 10, 2010. Surinder Kumar ...Petitioner(s) v. Ankur Kansal & Another ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Shri Deepak Agnihotri, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia , J. (Oral): Counsel for the petitioner submits that both the Courts below have caused eviction of the petitioner on the ground of personal necessity of landlord. Counsel further submits that since the findings of two Courts below are based on appreciation of evidence, he will not be able to canvass before this Court to do reappraisal and re-appreciation of the evidence. However, the petitioner is running a shop and to facilitate clearance of inventory, sufficient time be granted to make alternative arrangement. Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the son of the petitioner, who is present in the Court, states that if sufficient time is granted, he will not press the present petition. I find merit in the alternative submission made by the Counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, as prayed, the present petition is dismissed Civil Revision No.6800 of 2010 -: 2 :- as withdrawn. However, considering the fact that the petitioner is a shop keeper, eight months time is granted to make an alternative arrangement subject to his filing an undertaking in the court of Rent Controller that he shall hand over peaceful vacant possession of the demised property on or before 1.7.2011 and the undertaking shall also state that the entire arrears shall be paid and the rent for each following month shall be tendered on or before the 7th day of each month. The undertaking along with arrears be deposited in the Court of Rent Controller on or before 01.12.2010. [Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia] November 10, 2010. Judge kadyan