OF-i^t IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR WRTT PETmON (S) No. Of2006 t>»; PETITIONER Sint. Vyay Laxini Yadu Wd/o ^&'S-o"^'' ^ \< ^>'''!^?\^-"" •' -^?':%y-:" 6°?^" ^ ^^&-" RESPONDENTS .<<*! ^ cu ^o^ y(^ ^y^^ ^ Station Para, Ward No.IO, Rajiiandgaon (CG). VERSUS l.The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary , Panchayat and Social'Welfare Departnient, Mantralay , D.K.S. Bhawan, ^xu-(CG). !. GoUector, District Rajnandgaon (CG). 3. ChiefExecutive Officer, Zila Panchayat, District Rajnandgaon 4. Director, Directorate of Panchayat and Social Welfare , D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 5. Deputy Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare District Rajnandgaon (CG). ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 <nNdTa»Hra> 3^ '<||<<1<'1<1, »Tfly'IS,(«tc1iy^< ^. ^?:.B.47^6a/, ^ 20^ 3n^?r xa* (y^ci<^iEi') an^T^irfN^ WT3n^Ts»iiicti ?Riran:Hf?tT3;n^r 28-8-2006 Mr. Rakesh Anthony, counse^l Mr. Sumesh Beyu, Sovt. Ad^ & 5, on cdvance copy. l-1eard both the counsel. By this writ petition under the petitioner, who is the widow of as Grow Sahayak in the Panchayat respondents to grant compassionat^ Karmi. The case of the petitioner Sahayak, who died in harness on 2f Annexure P-1. Thereafter, appointment in the place of her higher secondary and she has als4 2004. The petitioner belongs ta| several repr-esentations for respondent No.5 vide letter date^t consent for the post of Shiksha to the t)istrict Education Officer bein9 passed. Learned counsel for the communication Annexure P-8 fr| petitioner has submittedan affidav]it tHe »l<lt(-l41-lHW<»[Tf f3:6 <R|<^1< ^srf^Ta-n^T for the petitioner. ocate for the State/respondents No.l, 2,4 /i|rticle 226/227 of the Constitution of India, f-ate Mithilesh Kumar Yadu, who was working l|)epartment, has mode a prayer to direct the ^ appointment to her on the post of Shiksha is thct her husband was workin9 as Sram P-6-2004. Copy of the decth certificate is petitioner- applied for compassionate k|usband. The petitioner iseducated up to passed Hindi-typing examination on 28-6- backward classes community. She made cc^mpassionate oppointment. Thereafter, 17-10-20)5 osked the petitioner to give K^irmi. The petitioner- submitted her consent |on 18-4-2006, but thereafter, no order is ^etitioner submits that on receivin9 the liffl the District Education Officer, the also, even then, the case of the petitioner P.T.O. XI-HC-78 TSf ^|A||c)4, 8llfl+l'16, RfCllUy MMMI a>qich ^^•W 200^ /, sn^T q^R (1^3^r) sii^r^rf^ri^i gwsn^igidNi gsiraTflfitT-w^w cdnsider accbrdance is not bein9 consider-ed. In the c| respondent No,3 be directed to compassionate appointment, in appearing for the Stote/responden^s Hon/in9 heard learned couns^l and circumstances of the case and is directed to consider the appointment, in aceordance with consider-ing the case of the petitiorjer With the direction aforesaid, Parties ore entitled for certl Ircumstances, learned counsel submits that the case of the petitioner re9arding with law, to which learned counsel No.l, 2,4 <& 5 has no objection. for the parties, having re9ard to the facts (laving perused the record, respondent No.3 of the petitioner for compassionate \OH and pass appropriate order after caSe «til^{i'l'Ifl-fWRTfft'teIA ()»RZK ^>3lf^IT3TI^T , the petition stands disposed of. fied copy of this order. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.