^' l^ HiGH COURT OF CMHATTiSGARM AT BILASPUR Sinaie Bench Appiicams Claimants Respondents Hon'bie Shri Diiip Raosaheb Deshmukh. J. M.C.C. No. 350/2003 01. Raghubar Singh, aged about 42 years, S/o Badhas Singh, 02. Hirmatia Bai, aged about 38 years, VV/o Raghuwar Singh. Caste - Gond, Both R/o VJIIage Damdam, P.Q. Kotmi, P.S. Pendra, District — Biiaspur (C.G.) versus 1. Kismat Kumar, aged about 22 years, S/o Budhram, R/o Chandauri, P<S. Pasa,", Tahsii - Katghora, District - Korba (C.G.) (Driver of offending vehicte No. C.G. 1Q" T/0347) 2. President, Nava Anjor Pawanputra Samahit Samuh, Damdam (Kotmi), Tehsi! - Pendra Road (C.G.) (Own^r of offending vehiole No. C.G. 10- T/0347) 3. The Regionaf Manager, The Oriental !nsurance Company Umited, BHaspur (Insurance Company of offending vehjc!e No. C.G. 10-T/0347) APPLiCATiON FOR RESTORATJON OF M.A.(Cl.No.455/20uS rresent Shri F.S.Khare, counsel forthe applicants. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 03ro September; 2009) Heard on i.A.No.1 for condonation of deiay of 477 days in iiiing the M.C.C. 2. The M.C.C. arises out of an order dated 04.04.2008 passed in M.A.(C).No.455/2008 whereby the Misceiianeous Appeai (C) has been dismissed in defauit ofthe appeliants. 3. No sufficient cause has been shown for condonation of inordinate deiay in fiiing the M.C.C. The appticants have stated in the appiication that their counsei had asked them to suppiy additionai documents so that necessary action could be taken. 4. in view of the laches op the part of the appiicants, the appiication (I.A.No.01) fiied under Section 5 or the Limitation Act is dismissed. Consequently, this M.C.C. is aiso dismissed. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge