IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 686 of 2002 (M/B) Mathura Datt Harbola, S/o Devi Datt Harbola, R/o 51, Ward No. 10, Heera Nagar, Haldwani, District Nainital. ……. Petitioner Versus 1. Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Haldwani, District Nainital. 2. State of Uttaranchal, through District Magistrate, Nainital. ……. Respondents. None for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondent No. 2. Mr. A.K. Joshi, Advocate for Kumaun Jal Sansthan. Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner’s counsel absent. Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondent No.2. Mr. A.K. Joshi, Advocate for Kumaun Jal Sansthan. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 17.05.2006 17.05.2006 G