IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2008 / 7TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 2567 of 2008(E) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------ P.C. MOIDEENKOYA, S/O. KUNHAHAMMED, ARAMAM HOUSE, P.O. MUTTANCHERY, NARIKKUNNI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- * THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VADAKARA. * CAUSE TITLE CORRECTED RESPONDENT “THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VADAKARA” IS CORRECTED AS “THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE AS PER ORDER DATED 22/01/2008 IN IA NO. 1134/2008. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M.R.SABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/03/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 2567/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE ABOVE REPRESENTATION DT. 27/11/2007 ALONG WITH THE SET OF TIMINGS PROPOSED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 26/2/2007 IN MVARP NO. 617/06 OF THE STAT ERNAKULAM. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL. True copy tga ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 2567 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: MARCH 27, 2008 JUDGMENT In this writ petition all that is sought for is the consideration of Ext.P1, an application made by the petitioner for revision of timings. 2. Though the Government Pleader submits that it does not contain any change in the circumstances justifying revision of timings, in my view, it is a matter to be considered by the respsondent. 3. Therefore this writ petition is disposed of directing that the respondent shall consider Ext.P1 and pass orders thereon with notice to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-