EEGH CQURT Q1: CHEAIHS‘GARH AT BILASPUR EMT PETITION (S) N0, 2838 of2£¥0§ PETETIGNERS : E. Amrii Lal Sihani Sfo Laie- Shn' Dxms Ram S§§hani aged about 46 years1 Rfo Viilagg Rasetm, PO Agjlmi Tehsii Aka iara, Digtt Jazy'gir €I1ampa (CG) . Fi‘amod Kama? Séngh Bais S/o SEm' Jawahar Singh Bais, ageé bout 48 years, RIG Wan‘i No. Chamya 8, Akalmm, (CG) Tehsii Akaltam, Dim. Janjgir V 3. Khamhan Frasad Sam] S/b Shri KhaibaElara Sahu, aged aboui 46 ymg‘s} R/o Wax‘d N0. 16, Bixarat Pespar, Akalmra, Tsimii Akahara, Bim‘ JanjgiwChampa (C. G.) 4. Slu‘iram Ngtam S/e Siém' Malik Ram Netam, aged about 48 y R/e Viliags Khaighari, Rab Poéi Dalha: Taxisi} ,ékaham, Eisii. Janjgir Champa (6G2) L VERSUS Siam 0f Chkati$garh Thmugh Secx‘eiaw, Depamnem 0f Schooi Education DK‘S‘ Shawn: Manifaiaya, Raipur (CG) Dimcm; Fubiig Educmim; Raipm; Digit Raipur (C. G.) ‘ Biock Educating Oiiice ¢ Akah’ara Dist: Emjgr Champa {CG} Li 5033K Déz‘scioz; Treasury AS201231t§ ané LET; PETI'HG; T L. DER ARTICLE Pengim, 226 BiEaspur OF THE (CG) CONSTETIJTIQN G§ EVIEé mi’hk §h3i Saiisia K anihair RESPONDEKTS p... w LN Rt‘esem: Shz‘i' Smii Oiwani, Aévocaie far ihe pefitiouer. Respoadams. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Adwcate Genami for thé Statei aww {mg} (Pa33¢§ on 22’“ {iay of Jame, 2009) E} r the ins’izm‘i e‘dtiem/ the petiiioziam , have myeéi ‘ for a £Zireciion to éhe rapeméems m cozlsider the case of the pétitieners on i113 ground 9f i3aréi'y fer g12131i of r6g11193‘ i3awnejli ~ fmm 1hr: {hie of iheir i11iiia§ appcimmem, also fer gram of incrsmsms and oihsr consequential} Leamed counsel fm ihs gigigioners; submits tha1 1&6 p$fii§0iiers “ere agpeéntsd on adimc basis in mé iiiomh a? November, 1985. Tm ,. ad SE: E , Ai 5. " 1)x pei‘iimaars Wgra i‘eappoinied 011 the p08: of Assistant Teachers on fixgd salary of Rs. BQO/C Vidé ordsy Lia‘md 25.11.3986 mwxzire 13/1) ami Since they are being gaid Y6gu§ar pay scab but the benefit of regular gay scale 21ml other cozasequamial benefi has no‘i beau exiended to th€ V p6tiii011€rs from ’{he dam oftheir in‘iai appointment Ha“ furthsr submi‘xS ii t he is net prassm thiS petition a”; tili sage, howsveg the p€iitiozaer3 may be given iiberty to fzle fresh representatior; t0 {he respemi No. '2‘ i0 4 for redressa} of their grievances alongwi‘th copy of this petitiea, who i1} mm may 3m fufther éiree‘teé to decide the same within the specified pe'fiod, 3, Leamee ceunsel f0; “i116 respmldents Siabmits that in ease the petitioners £19, fresh regesenta‘xion alongwiah copy of this yetition Within a period of 15 days from toéay befm'e respondes No. 2 to 4? the same $111 be considez‘ed ami decided by Ieeponéen’ts No. 2 to 4 wiihiz: a furiher periotl of four weeks from the date of receip’i ofrepresentatioo. In View of the 311b1nissions made by leamed counsei for the parties, the instam peti‘iion is disposed of wii’h Ebexey to the petitioners to tile fresh representation abgwi copy of this petition before respondeiits No. 2 to 4 With a oeriod of 15 days from today. On suc represemaion ‘oeiiig made by the petitioners, he same shaft be consired and decideo bx the respondents No. 2 to 4 Within a further period of four weeks from the clate of receipt of representation: in aeeoi‘danoe with law. i ‘ $._.. i, s Sd/- i“ 1: Satish K. Agnihotri ‘1" _ Judge g . ii‘ii‘e i a (A ts ‘ha g s ien ‘ m 31 nth i 1 h t t de