[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2802 OF 2005. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2802 OF 2005. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2802 OF 2005. Shri Sukhdev @ Sahadev L Dhavare ..Petitioner. V/s Assistant Commissioner of Police And others ..Respondents. Mr.M.B. Kale, Advocate h/f Mr. Uday. B.Nighot,Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.D.P. Adsule, APP for the State. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 24TH JANUARY, 2007. DATE : 24TH JANUARY, 2007. DATE : 24TH JANUARY, 2007. P.C. . Heard Mr. M.B. Kale, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Adsule, learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner, by this petition, has challenged the order dated 11/1/2005, of his externment passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Pune City. By that order he was to be externed from the Commissionarate area of Pune, Pune District and the Districts adjoining Pune for a period of two years from the date of order. The petitioner challenged that order by filing appeal, which also came to be dismissed on 13th May, 2005. [2] Being aggrieved by the said orders, the petitioner had filed this petition contending that the order is illegal and unwarranted. He also sought interim relief. While granting Rule in the matter on 16/1/2006, this Court had stayed the effect of externment order in respect of the areas other than the Pune District. It means, he was to be out of Pune District even after the stay order. The period of externment being two years has already elapsed. Thus, this petition has become infructuous. Mr. Adsule, learned APP also states that in view of the limited interim relief granted by this Court, the purpose of externment order is already served. Learned Counsel for the petitioner also does not press for any further orders. . In view of the above circumstances, the petition stands disposed off, as infructuous. (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) [3]