IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29341 of 2009 SADDAM @ SADDAM HUSSAIN @ KALLU s/o Iliyas Sheikh, resident of village- Ghurghura Hanuman Nagar, P. S. Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi. … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 05.10.2009. Heard counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the informant as also counsel for the State. The allegations against the petitioner in the first information report is somewhat corroborated at least from the post-mortem report where five different nature of injuries absolutely rule out the prospect of the case being one of suicide. To that extent the court below also seems to be perfectly justified in taking a view that whatever materials have been brought in the case diary to support the story of suicide primarily on the basis of report of a spy (Gupture) does not seem to be convincing. The petitioner is the sole named accused in the first information report with a clear assigned motive and previous history of threat given on the life of the deceased. There are also the statement of witnesses in the case-diary with regard to the petitioner 2 taking part in the assault on the person of the deceased. As to whether such an injury could be fatal blow can at best be gone into at the stage of trial but then it cannot be said in the case of suicide, a theory which has been propounded by counsel for seeking bail of petitioner. That being so this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and his prayer for bail is hereby rejected. However, the trial court will ensure that if commitment has already been made the trial of the petitioner may be completed within a period of one year. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)