IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 382 of 2008 Between: Ms.Vasundhara Par Boiled Modern Rice Mill, Venkatagiri H/o. Gudimalla (v) Khammam Rural (M) Khammam District, rep. by its Partner G.Nageswar Rao S/o.Rama Rao, agd 37 years. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Khammam. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Khammam. 3 The Tahasildar, Khammam Rural (M) at Khammam Khammam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ or direction preferably writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in finalizing the process of regularization in respect of land which is in possession of the petitioner, to an extent of 0-36 gts., in Sy. Nos. 289/41 and 289/82 situated at Venkatagiri (v) Gudimalla Revenue village, Khammam Rural (M), Khammam District, on the basis of representation dt. 20.4.2007 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to regularize the possession of the petitioner to the extent of 0-36 gts. and pass such other or further orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KOWTURU VINAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: Questioning the inaction on the part of the respondents in finalizing the process of regularization in respect of land which is in possession of the petitioner to an extent of 0.36 guntas in S.Nos.289/41 and 289/82 situate at Venkatagiri Village, Gudimalla Revenue Village, Khammam Rural (M) Khammam District on the basis of representation dated 20.4.2007, the present writ petition is filed. Today, when the matter is taken up for admission, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition stating that the petitioner has already filed a civil suit O.S.No.328 of 2007 against the respondent authorities when they tried to take possession of the property and obtained status quo orders in I.A.No.228 of 2007 and, therefore, he would workout his remedies in the civil suit. It is also stated that liberty may be given to the petitioner to avail the benefit under G.O.Ms.No.166 dated 16.2.2008. In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought for. N.V.RAMANA,J Dated 27.3.2008 msv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The District Collector, Khammam. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Khammam. 3 The Tahasildar, Khammam Rural (M) at Khammam Khammam District. 4. 2CCs to G.O.Revenue, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad. 5 2CD copies