e- /-^,0, IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 306'3_OF 2005 PETITIONER: VERSUS Ganesh Lal Soni, S/o- Late Shri Tejnath Soni, Aged About- 40 Years, Occupation-Ex-Serviceman (Category-II, Deepka Expansion Project, South Eastern Coalfields Ud.), R/o- Quarter No. M.D.-791, Deepka Colony, Thana-Kusmunda, Distt. -Korba (C.G.) RESPQNDENT^S): ..^ Yf • • .-•' w/ ^> _^%/ ^sy .'•'•/v v ^'^°c- :-'y » ^ &•' ^' ^" ///5:^\ 11 1. South Eastern CoaJfields Limited / Through: Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, Head Quarter at Seepat Road Bilaspur,Distt.-Bilaspur (C.G.) 2< Chief General Manger, Gevra Area / South Eastem Coalfields Limited Thesil-Katghora, Distt. -Korba (C.G.) 3': General Manager (Personnel), Gevra ' Area, South Eastenn Coalfields Limited, Thesil-Katghora, Distt. - Korba (C,G.) 4. Personnel Manager, Gevra Area, South Eastem Coalfields Limited, Thesil-Katghora, Distt. -Korba (C.G.) 5^ Chief Project OfEcer, Deepka Expansion Project, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Thesil-Katghora, Distt. -Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA _FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WR[T IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS / CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION / ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE. XI-HC-78 \dwq r^iqirt^, y-fllwifi, Rtrti'(iy'< W.P- 3>0fc1- *1MWI W!W 3IT^?T q^P (l<il1jcl«Ei) ^200^ an^STcpT R'licb cTaiT3fi^sTami<p ftl-wft STarsRwfigaiT^ST 20.7.2005 Shri Viaay Pandey, coiin^el for the petitioner. Heard onadinissiou. Tliis petition has been filejd for quashiag offhe order dated 2.4.2004 .(Annexure P- 1) w| passing ofthe said onler, a Annexure P- 2, but the same| In the facts and circumsl not iacluied to entertaia thid <i>i<ifn<4li fi+id|'^''ls'<l •(luK-ci't ^3Ti^T3)T^ST hich is an order passed by fhe discipUnaiy authorily after tljie departinental enquiry. Leamed counsel for th^ petitioner Subniits that after iepartnient appeal was filed vide has not been decided so far. taaces of the case, this Court is petition at this stage. However, fbis Court observes that| the appeal ffled before the coinpetent aufhority, if no|t disposed of so far, shaU be disposed of wifhin a perioc^ of 1 inoath froin the date of production of certified copj? of fhis order before the said authority. The petitioner shaU be at| Hberty to approach this Court if aay adverse order is passed ^y the appeBate auffaority. In view of this order, ijietition as weU as M.W.P.No. 2557/2005 aad I.A.No.596^/2005 for ui^ent hearing stand disposed of. Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge