IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 11222 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: 30.04.2010. Rajni and another. ...... PETITIONERS Versus State of Punjab and others. ...... RESPONDENTS CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Parties in person with Mr. K.D.S.Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ranvir Singh Arya, D.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners requests for placing on record voter list – 2009, Annexure P5 regarding proof of age of petitioner No.1 – Rajni. The same is taken on record. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos.4 and 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. CRM No.M-11222 of 2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar i.e. respondent No.2 is directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law on application dated 08.04.2010 (Annexure P-4), made to him by the petitioners. As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners are major. Age of petitioner No.1-Rajni, as per copy of Voter List - 2009, Annexure P-5, is 22 years and date of birth of petitioner No.2– Sanjeev Kumar as per copy of Driving Licence, Annexure P-2, is 27.06.1985. They got married on 08.04.2010. Photographs of the marriage are Annexure P-3. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners in the petition, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 - i.e. Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar to take appropriate action in accordance with law on application dated 08.04.2010 (Annexure P4) as already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioners. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) April 30, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2