C.W.P.No. 948 of 2005. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P.No. 948 of 2005. Date of Decision : 26.11.2008. Tek Ram and another Petitioner. VERSUS State of Haryana and others. Respondents. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH. --- Present:- Mr. Shailendra Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Palika Monga, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. R.S.Longia, Advocate, for Mr. Arun Walia, Advocate, for HUDA. --- 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? M.M.KUMAR,J. The petitioners have prayed for quashing notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on 14.8.2003 (Annexure P-9) and 10.4.2004(Annexure P-14). Their principal ground of challenge is that they have constructed 'A' Class houses. In respect of the land the Director has submitted report dated 26.9.2008 which is available on the file of C.W.P.No. 14769 of 2006 stating that land belonging to the C.W.P.No. 948 of 2005. 2 petitioner has been released from acquisition. In other words, land belonging to the petitioner measuring 922.22 square yards has been released with proportionate vacant area has been excluded from the acquisition. The proportionate vacant area is taken to mean the area equivalent to the released area i.e. 922.22 square yards. Learned counsel the petitioner expresses satisfaction over the order passed by the Director. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as having become infructions. (M.M.KUMAR ) JUDGE 26.11.2008 ( JORA SINGH) Anoop JUDGE