HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Si N0.6681 OF 2008 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 2. 3. 4. Shanker Das, S/o Bharat Das, agedabout 40 years, Oc6upaUon Driver, Category - 5, 5.E.C.L, Excavation Wortehop Colliery, Kurasiya, Presently reverted In Labour Grade Category - II, R/o Purana Badaripara, Chirmiri, Tahsit Manendragarh, Distrfct Korea(CG). Versus The Managir^i Director, South Eastem Coalfields Lirhited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil and Disfrict Bilaspur(eG). The Deputy Chief Pereonnel Manager, Ghirmiri Area, S.E.C.L. Chirmiri (CG). The Sub Area Manager, Kurasiya Group, Sduth Eastem Coaffietds Limited, Post Kurasiya Cofliery, DisfriGt Korea (CG) . The Quarry SuperintendenyManager, Kurasiya Colliery, Kurasiya, Dirtnct Kdrea ffX3). OA/rit petjtionunderArticte 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : HQn'bleShri SatishK. ABnihotri, J. Present:- Smt.RenuKochar.counselforttispetitioner. Dr. N.K. Shukla, Sr, ,Ad^rate wiBi Snrt. Ayetri Sen Gupta, Advocate forthe re^p(>ncl8nt No.1. .r Gowri ORALORDER (Passedon1his'l7uldayofFebr!uary,2009) The pstjtioner is a workman and the respondent js an indushy. Under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (forshort "ffie Act, f947") it is well settted that if a workman has any grievance or dispute with the management, the workman shoytd take recourse to effeetive ancl statutory remedy under the provisions of the Act, 1947. 2) At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it is a case of violation of princjples of nafciral jusUce. 3) Be thatas it may.the same dispute can be decided bythe Labour . Court also. The Labour Court is a judicial Court and has all wherewjthals to decidethedisputebeliweenthemanagementanclftsemptoyee. 4) In view of the foregoing, the petition is liable to be dismissed and it is herebydismissed.Noorderastocosts. I 5) Consequently, I.A.Nos.1 & 2 stand disposed of[ Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge