IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.22137 of 2010 ASHOK KUMAR son of Sri Ram Lakhan Mahto Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr. Misc. No. 20106 of 2010 SANOJ @ SONU KUMAR son of Sri Janardan Singh Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 09.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 419, 420, 406, 467, 468, 469, 478, 472, 473, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioners are in custody since 27.3.2010 and have no criminal antecedents and the entire case is based on documents, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Beur P.S. Case No.47 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and the other bailor shall be the father of the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners. Further, petitioner Sanoj @ Sonu Kumar (Cr. Misc. No.20106 of 2010) is required to give third bailor also who will be local since he is the resident of Gaya district, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and, if they are, they - 2 - shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse,(iv) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (v) that the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)