•;"(^' •^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR G7? WRIT PETITION f^^) No. ' 72010 Petitioners fFOR POLICE PROTECTION) ^ Respondents ^' K/<^.''\.'' ^>j9Wy ^;-;^-\y e^y y ¥'y ^./ ^" ^ 2. 1. 2. 3. ^"" 4. ^~ s'r 6.^ Kishan Lal Gabel, aged about 22 years, son of Shri Hari Gabel, Caste - Kurmi, occupation - Driver (Heavy Motor Vehicle) Smt.Seeta Gabel, aged about 22 years, W/o Shri Kishan Lal Gabet, Both R/o. Vill. Kumhari Kala, P.S. Baradwar, Distt. Janjgir - Champa VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Deptt of Home Affairs, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter, Raipur (CG) Superintendent of Police, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG) Superintendent of Police, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG) Station House Officer, Police Station - Malkharoda, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG) 7. ^' 8. y 9. Station House Officer, Police Station - Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (CG) Ghanshyam Gabel, aged about 50 years, son of - Not known, R/o. Vill. Turekela, P.S. Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (CG) (Father of Petitioner No.2) Smt. Amar Kunwar Gabet, aged about 45 years, W/o Shri Ghanshyam Gabel/ R/o. Vill. •^ Turekela, P.S. Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (CG) (Mother of Petitioner No.2) 10. Heera Lal Gabel, aged about 50 years, S/o. Shri Bhagat Ram Gabel, R/o. Vill. Pota Amandula, P.S. Malkharoda, Distt. Janjgir- Champa (CG) (Uncle of Petitioner No.2) 11. Phul Kunwar, aged about 40 years W/o Shri Mohan Singh Gabel, R/o. Vill. Pota Aman Dula, P.S. Malkharoda, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG). (Aunty of Petitioner No.2) 12. Mohan Singh Gabel, aged about 40 years S/o. D.R. Gabel, R/o Vjllage Pota Amandula, P.S. Malkharoda, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG). (Uncle of Petitioner No.2) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227_QETHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cr.) N0.7452 OF 2010 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS Kishan Lal Gabel & Another Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Singte Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. -- Present:- Shri A.N. Bhakta, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. Petitioners are also present. QRDER (Passed on this 14th day of September, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that on account of threat crated by the respondents No.8 to 12 (family members of petitioner No.2), the petitioners are not allowed to enter into their village namely; Kumhari Kala, Police Station Baradwar, District Janjgir-Champa. Thus, the petitioners could not make a complaint even in the Police Station. 3. Be that as it may, if an application is made by the petitioners to the Superintendent of Police, Janjgir-Champa, the Superintendent of Police is directed to examine the complaint of the petitioners seriously and extend protection to them, if it is found that their lives are not safe. 4. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that if a complaint is made by the petitioners to the Superintendent of Police, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits. 5. In view of the above, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn