1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 451/2010. ( Manisha S. Rachhore and another -: versus :- Nirmala Suraj Rachhore and another ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 4, 2010. Heard Smt. N.A. Baila, learned counsel for petitioners and Shri Khubalkar, learned counsel for respondents. Though the learned counsel for petitioners has urged some points to canvass that the respondent has no status as wife of deceased, I find that, that issue needs to be looked into after parties are given opportunity to prove their respective stand. The trial Court has by the impugned order in succession proceeding permitted the respondents to be impleaded as parties. The trial Court will definitely look into all objections being raised to the status of the parties before it, and resolve the issue in accordance with the law. The other argument of learned counsel for petitioner is that the intervention has been done belatedly only to harass the petitioners. I find that the succession case is of the year 2007. The trial Court therefore to attempt to 2 decide the same as early as possible. With these directions the Writ Petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rgd.