WM fV/ @ IN THE HIéH CC‘URT GF JUDICATURE AT BILA5PUR (C.é.} wRIT 95111199.: N0. 0DUOGF C 2003 PETEHONERS: 1. Yuvmj 622d, 5/6 Maf'mji §e2d, Aged abou? 39 years, Worng as Consfubiz (Diese! Mechanic), Posfed a? Range: Police Mofer Transport Workshop, Biinspur: Disf": Bilaspur (C.6.) MGhd. Sadiq, 5/5 Abdul Kaiiq, Aged abou? 4.7 years Working as Head Cons'mhla (Trade Mechanis), Pos'f Va? , f ed Range: Peiice Meter Trnsper'r Warkshop: Bibepun D€s+i Eilaseur (6.6.) h Mohcmh! Pancre, 5/0 Late Kishore Singh Panshre Aged abouf 34 years; Week€r1g ae C0es+ab§e (Trade Meshenist), Pesred a? Range: olice Mofr- Transporf Weeks¥1o, Bilaspur, 95th gespur {5.5.} 4. Ramaym Pmsad Vishwakarma, S/e Ram Prasgd Vishwekerma, Aged dew“? 33 year: Werking es Head Cewmble (Elucksmi*h Trade), Pasted af Range: Peiice Mom" Trmspsr? Workehop, Biiaspur' Dis‘H. Bi‘nspur (C.6.) Versus RE SPONDENTS: 1.. Union of Iridia, Through: The Secremr'y, Dep‘r-r. of Personnei & Training] fv‘xinisfr‘y of Home Affairs, I/r /' New 5am. ki a P o p 5 u [3 ® 2. 5%a1’e of Madhya Pradegh, Through: The 5ecramry, Dep-H'. of Home Affairs, VaHabh §hawar1, Show! (MP3 3. S‘mw af Chha'h‘isgahh, Thmugh: The 5ecra‘mry, Depf‘r. of Home Affairs, D.K.S. 3hawan, Mgmmbya, Raipur ($16.) f/ WQET PETITZON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTETUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURI‘ OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Singe Bench: Hon’blc Mr. Justice satish K. Apihotr Writ Petition No. 3 190 of 2003 Petitioner Yuvraj Greed &. others Vslsus Respondents Union of India Ga othem Shri B. D. Guru, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri S. K. Beriwal, Standing counsel for Rcspondent No. 1. Shli Sandeep Dubey, Govt. Advocate for Respondents No. 3. Shri V. C. 0t1alwar, Advocatc for respondent No. 2. ORAL ORDER ( 21“ February, 2006) The following order of the Court was passed by Satlsh K. Ayihotri, J. 1. Learned counsel appealing for the petitioners submit that the petitioners, who are working in Police Motor Transport Workshop, Bilaspur in the Home Department, are permanent residents of the State of Madhya Pmdesh. The petin'oners have been allocated to the State of Chhattisgarh and they want their reallocation to the State of Madhya Pradesh. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instruction, submits that the petih’oners be granted liberty to make a representation to the respondents for redressal of their grievances. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection to the said submission. 2. In View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of dually, with liberty to the petitioners to make appropriate representation to the respondents/authorin'es concemed, within a period of two weeks horn today, and the respondents/authorih‘es are directed to consider and decide the same, in' an objective manner, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, if any Certiiied copy, as per Rules. *7 Sdl- At ‘ Satish K. Judge Agm'houi dil F‘ Thakur