SBCRLMB No.4280/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. ORDER S.B.CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.4280/2010. Ramveer Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:- July 16, 2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri C.C. Ratnu, Counsel for petitioner. Shri Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor. ****** Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available to me during the arguments of the case. Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that there are in all five cases registered against the petitioner whereas, the fact is that three out of five cases have been found to be false because in three of those cases, the petitioner filed revision petitions against the order of charge in which the revision petitions have been allowed with finding that there was absolutely no evidence against the petitioner and he was falsely implicated therein. In the present case also the offence alleged against the petitioner is under Sections 379 and 411 IPC. The SBCRLMB No.4280/10. 2 petitioner would undertake not to indulge in any offence in future and therefore, he should be given benefit of bail pending the trial. The petitioner was arrested on 4th July, 2009 and thus he remained behind the bars for more than a year. Bail application of the petitioner was rejected by the court below only on the ground that there were other cases pending against the petitioner whereas the fact is that the petitioner was falsely implicated in those cases after his arrest in the present case. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I deem it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner, namely, Ramveer Son of Shri Sahajram on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in FIR No.140/2009, Police Station Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, under Section 379 IPC (subsequently charge sheet for offence under Sections 379, 411, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC was filed), provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. SBCRLMB No.4280/10. 3 However, in case the petitioner is again found indulging in similar or any other offence at any point of time in future, the bail granted to him by this court in the present case would be liable to be cancelled at the instance of the prosecution on this ground alone and stipulation to this effect shall be inserted in the bail bonds produced by the petitioner, and the sureties to be produced in support thereof shall be verified by the Tehsildar of the area concerned. The bail application stands disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ) J. anil