IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No. 15556 of 2008 Between: Shaheda Begum, W/o. Nayeemullah Khan, R/o. H.No.18-10-40/18, Barkas, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner of Police, South one, Purani Haveli, Old Commissioner of Officer, Chatta Baar, Hyderabad. 3 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Charminar Division, Charminar, Hyderabad. 4 The Station House Officer, P.S. Chandrayangutta, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce the detenue Mr. Abdullah Khan, S/o. Nayeemullah Khan, aged about 22 years, R/o. H.No. 18-10-40/18, Barkas, Hyderabad and set him at liberty as the court of law, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.SYED AHMED ALI Counsel for the Respondents : THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No.15556 of 2008 ORAL ORDER : (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R.Varma) This Writ of Habeas Corpus is filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to produce the son of the petitioner viz., Mr.Abdullah Khan, S/o. Nayeemullah Khan, aged about 22 years, R/o. H.No. 18-10-40/18, Barkas, Hyderabad, who was illegally detained by the respondents and set him at liberty. 2. When the matter came up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner represented that subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, the alleged detenu was produced before the Magistrate concerned and, therefore, nothing remains for adjudication in this matter. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition has become superfluous and the same is liable to be dismissed. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA _______________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 28-07-2008 Msr. ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner of Police, South one, Purani Haveli, Old Commissioner of Officer, Chatta Baar, Hyderabad. 3 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Charminar Division, Charminar, Hyderabad. 4 The Station House Officer, P.S. Chandrayangutta, Hyderabad. 5. 2 CCs to the Advocate General, Government of Andhra Pradesh, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OUT). 6. 2 CD copies. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No.15556 of 2008 28-07-2008 (Msr)