L/< ' ‘ 3WGLE BENcH ML “a .L 1E THE EEQE {IC‘UET QF EUBIE‘ ATLRE AT EEL§S§UR {CI}; W? {5‘5 §Qwftmwigaaua PEYETEQNEE Eat‘nur ai‘x’i Kw: Age£ abs—gut 55 / yearai 3;; 9 Late Eakkv E’raaaé Kari at preaEnt wmrkiixg as a Kii-ahi Vikajx Adruiaari £Ehsmm 8&1’1r& ahm} Ekmga4 Egaen Tk‘h— Eengargagn - Diatrict ~ Eaj:1m&gaan. {€313} DEVélggwzwrzt {:ifficer thréugih Eepu‘rf Biz‘actczz“ Agz‘icmlmm Eepartmerat E&§ft&21§dga3n {CG} PETITKEEKI {EEER ARTEC‘LE 2§£§ Q}: TEE CQ§I§TITEEIC1N i3? Ema my; igguwcv m: Air'mmma‘m m5 in? Eww’g 1M13§ $13 @Tmiaam cam: m2: mm ‘ §BEA§§1Emam igmEETmHg‘ l/ /f EsE’EEPuE‘axwJ‘J—r 1, ata? sf £§11=ii§i$gar§a / +krcxag£rh 1&1; J wwtegy Ag? 09mg? q» . _.-c“"’ @ OV/O$a\ " ‘\\’ ....... ; “uEtux‘? Depaz tmpat DillEi. E11a7JV5°t'3 Iagptzr.( £ - K“_Ci r3 ?“ 2:“ ébv Jr? — 2. E§I9€tgrl i &gfiCLitg-irel ugci.5_( - ‘g n. Agfimltuw E 2am ‘ targat: saggi— merit, Raggzga Ehstfzr‘t - i 3 , Réigzgr= §f:£§} Begaggy Eireama Agra cxgitaga Delcartmezzt Ea} aaikégagra Eistriait Rajnaaci— ii EIR, Ea§fh§w z gfg'cigitzgref XI~HC~78 WWWW Cu HE 200 WW(W) WWW wmm mwffwm $Wm m m w m 10.8.2006 Roshaw- ' ML Vishnu Kasta, Advocate fq1r the petitioner. Mr, Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Advo‘pate for the State on advance copy‘ Heard By the instant petition, the petitioner, who is working as Senior Agricutture Development omcer, Dongargaon, Tehsii Dongergarh, has questioned his transfer order dated 17.2006 (Annexure P-1) whereby he has been transferred under Deputy Director, Agriculture, Ambik u r on administrative ground. itioner is that he is going to retire within a period of two years and at the fag en of his career, he has been transferred against the transfer poiicy of State, which e visages that if retirement of any empioyee is due‘ then he ahouid not be subjected o transfer in the circumstances, teams counsei for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner may be aiiowed to make a epresentation to respondent No.2 and in tum, respondent No.2 be directed to deci e the same in accordance with law, to which learned counsel for the State has no bjection. Having heard teamed counse for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, with ut expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the petitioner is allowed to ma 'e a representation to respondent No.2 within ‘ ten days from today along with copy fthis petition and in turn, respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petl ioner within a period of 3O days from the date of receipt of representation in accor ance with law after considering all the points raised by the petitioner. With the direction aforesaid, t e petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No3 16/06 also stands disposed of Certified copy as per rules. The main grievance of the a Sdl- L.C. Bhadoo Judge RT.O. t