IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16486 of 2011 Date of decision: 05.09.2011 Sukhchain Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) The only grievance raised by learned counsel for the petitioners is that respondent No.2 is not supplying the certified copy of order dated 7.4.2011 dismissing their appeals against the eviction order passed under the Public Premises Act, thereby depriving the petitioners to approach this Court challenging the eviction order as well as appellate order dated 7.4.2011. He has further contended that meanwhile respondents are adamant to evict the petitioners pursuant to the eviction order after dismissal of appeals on 7.4.2011. Learned counsel further states that similarly situated other persons have already filed writ petition No.10497 of 2011 before this Court challenging the eviction order and dismissal of appeals since certified copy of the appellate order was supplied to them. He further contends that respondent No.2 be directed to supply the copy of order dated 7.4.2011 within such time as fixed by this Court so that petitioners may approach this Court. Present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to supply the certified copy of order dated 7.4.2011 to the petitioners or their respective counsel if application to obtain certified copy has been moved in accordance with law within ten days from the date certified copy of this order is placed before respondent No.2. It goes without saying that for 20 days from today eviction order shall not be given effect to so that petitioners may take appropriate steps challenging order dated 7.4.2011. (Alok Singh) Judge September 05, 2011 R.S.