WP(C) 4834/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE IA ANSARI Heard Mr. M. Bhagawati, learned counsel, for the petitioner, and Mr. G. Soren, learned Govt. Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondents. With the help of this writ petition, the petitioner has raised certain claims fo r his outstanding dues. The respondents do not admit the correctness of the dues of the petitioner. This apart, no acknowledgement from the respondents has been submitted by the petitioner in support of his claim as regards the outstanding dues. In such circumstances, the present writ petition requires determination of complex disputed questions of fact. Determination of such questions of fact wou ld, obviously, require making of roving enquiry and also recording of evidence. Such an exercise is not appropriate in a case of present nature. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ petition, without expressing any opinion on the correctness or veracity of the averments made by the parties, is dismissed making it clear that dismissal of the writ petition sh all not cause prejudice to the rights, if any, of the petitioner. The petitioner may, however, take recourse to Civil Court of competent jurisdiction for remedy of his grievances, if so advised.