IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 17317 of 2002 Between: 1 Govindaram Sarma S/o. Ramanarayana D.No.14.5.250, Mevathipura, Chudi Bazar, Hyderabad-500012. 2 Rankawat Ramakishan S/o. Amardas H.NO.14-5-200, Chudi Bazar, Hyderabad-500012. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Director General & Inspector General of Police, Governmnet of A.P., Lakidikapool, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 3 The Deputy COmmissioner of Police, Central zone, Abids, Hyderabad. 4 The Station House Officer, Shinayatgunj PS (Goshamahal PS), Goshamahal, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRit of Mandamus declare the action of the respondent 1 to 4 in not registering the petitioners complaint dt.30.8.2002 with regard tooccurrences took place on 29.8.2002 at Chudi Bazar, Hyderabad is illegal, irregular, and against the chapter 21 Order 409 of the A.P. Police Manual and also violative the fundemental rights of the petitioners as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to act in accordance with law as envisaged under Section 154(1) to (3) of Criminal procedure Code and chapter 21 order 409 of the A.P. Police Manaual and register the with regard to occurrences took place on 29.8.2002 at 20-00 hrs at Chudi Bazar, Hyderabad and thus render justice to us by directing the respondents to provide protection to the lives of the petitioners, and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.G.SEETHARAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: When the matter was called on 16.04.2008 none appeared for the petitioner and therefore, it was posted to next week under the caption “for dismissal”. Today also none appeared. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:23.04.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JPK}