1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.964 OF 2011 Hamid Guddubhai Sayyad .Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.Rahul S. Kate, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.P.P.Bhosale, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 28TH NOVEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a person, who apprehends arrest in connection with C.R.No.186 of 2011 for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 325, 323, 143, 147, 148, 149, 504 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Daund Police Station, District Pune and who is alleged to have present along with his brothers Ramjan and Gulab, who 2 hit the victim with an iron rod made him suffer fracture of left ulna and injuries on his right forearm, right arm, right thigh & right leg. The applicant is alleged to have participated in the assault by beating the victim with fists. The learned counsel for the applicant states that there are no injuries which could be attributed to the applicant's participation in the assault. Considering the nature of injuries sustained by the victim and the role attributed to the applicant, applicant's being in custody for the purpose of investigation may not be necessary. In the event of arrest, applicant be released on bail on his furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.25,000/- on the following conditions. (i) The applicant shall report at the Daund Police Station, District Pune on 1st December, 2011 at 11.00 a.m. and thereafter, as and when required by the investigating officer. (ii) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required. 3 (iii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (iv) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. . The order will remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge sheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in AIR 2011 (SC) 312. 3. Criminal Application is disposed of. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.) 4