THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2743 OF 2010 DATED: 19-11-2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 25-06-2010, in I.A.No.116 of 2010 in O.S.No.43 of 2010 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Bhainsa, wherein the learned Judge while granting ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from entering into ‘Om Sri Varalaxmi Ashram’ situate in H.No.4- 71 on the bank of river Godavari and from obstructing or interfering with the performance of the day to day pujas by the disciples and also directing the Sub Inspector of police, Bhainsa to provide necessary police protection at the ashram for performance of the functions on 27-06- 2010. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the record. 3. Petitioner herein is the 2nd defendant. Respondents 1 & 2 herein filed the suit for permanent injunction restraining the petitioner from interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject– ashram and performance of functions therein. Plaintiff filed I.A.No.116 of 2010 seeking temporary injunction. The learned civil Judge while granting ex parte ad-interim injunction on 23-06-2010 also directed the Sub Inspector of police, Bhainsa to provide necessary protection for the performance of functions on 27-06-2010. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner-D2 would contend that granting of police protection along with grant of interim injunction by the learned Junior Civil Judge is unwarranted as no relief seeking police aid was prayed for nor any application is filed by the plaintiff seeking the said relief. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents on the other hand would submit that the order was passed granting police protection only for one day i.e. on 27-06-2010 to enable the plaintiff to perform the functions and subsequently there has been no police protection at all and there was no extension of such police protection subsequent to 27-06-2010. 6. Duly recording the said submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents, it is held that no further orders need be passed in this petition insofar as the grievance relating to grant of police protection is concerned inasmuch as the said police aid was granted only for one day i.e. on 27-06-2010 and the said order has already worked itself out. It is open to the petitioner to avail the remedies permissible under law to assail the order of ad-interim injunction granted by the trial Court. 7. In the result, Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 19th November, 2010. Tsy