CRM NO. M-10070 OF 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM NO. M-10070 OF 2011 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 06.04.2011 Didar Singh ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate, for the petitioner. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) This is second bail petition for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.32 dated 06.02.2011 under Sections 409/ 419/ 420/ 467/ 468/ 471 IPC read with Section 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Patiala. Previous bail petition of the petitioner was dismissed on merits vide order dated 01.03.2011 passed in CRM No. M- 6360 of 2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that second bail petition is maintainable in view of authority “Ravinder Saxena vs. State of Rajasthan” AIR 2010 Supreme Court 1225. The allegation in the present case is that amount of ` 58,70,000/-was withdrawn from the account of G.P.F of various CRM NO. M-10070 OF 2011 (O&M) -2- account holders and that amount has been embezzled. The case has been registered after inquiry. During inquiry, it was revealed that the amount of ` 2 lacs was deposited in the G.P.F account of Ram Chander, which was withdrawn by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the said amount of ` 2 lacs is a personal loan received by the petitioner from Kulwinder Singh. I have considered the submissions but do no find any force in the same. The huge amount has been embezzled. The custodial interrogation of the petitioner is necessary. So, no ground for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Dismissed. APRIL 06, 2011 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE