IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 01.11.2010 C.R.No.7154 of 2010 Salma and others ...Petitioners Versus Khushi Mohd. and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Anil Kumar Garg, Advocate, for the petitioners. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present revision petition is to an order passed by the learned trial Court on 16.09.2010, whereby the evidence of the plaintiffs was closed by an order. The plaintiffs are claiming compensation from the defendants on account of wrongful death of Hanif Mohd. son of Kaka by the defendants. It is in the said suit, the order of closing of evidence of the plaintiffs has been passed by the learned trial Court, which is impugned in the present revision petition. It is pointed out that by the petitioners that the case is now fixed for 10.01.2011 and that if one opportunity is granted to the plaintiffs, they shall conclude their entire evidence on the date fixed. It is further pointed out that on earlier dates also the plaintiffs have led their evidence and due to circumstances in the family, the plaintiffs could not conclude their entire evidence. C.R.No.7154 of 2010 Keeping in view the fact that the plaintiffs are the successor-in- interest of Hanif Mohd., who has died, I deem it appropriate to grant one opportunity to the plaintiffs to lead their entire evidence on the date fixed i.e. 10.01.2011. It shall be open to the plaintiffs to seek assistance of the Court to secure the presence of any of the witness, who is required to be produced by the plaintiffs in support of their case. With the said observations, the revision petition is disposed of. Copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. 01.11.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE 2 C.R.No.7154 of 2010 3