IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 20TH MAGHA 1932 WA.No. 974 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.7339/2008 Dated 17/10/2008 .................... APPELLANT(S): IST RESPONDENT IN WPC ----------------------------------- THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(G), ALAPPUZHA. BY MS.ANU SIVARAMAN, GOVERNMENT PLEADER RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER & ADDL. RESPONDENT NO.2 IN WPC -------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE MANAGIONG COMMITTEE OF KANDALLOOR FARMERS SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.1410, KANDALLOOR PO, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT S.ANANDAN. 2. K.P.JANARAJAN,S/O.KUNJU PILLAI, SHIJU BHAVAN, KANDALLOOR SOUTH, KANDALLOOR PO, KAYAMKULAM. ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM FOR R1 MR.K.RAMAKUMAR FOR R2 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/02/2011, ALONG WITH WA NO. 1011 OF 2010 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JJ. .................................................................... W.A. Nos.974 & 1011 of 2010 .................................................................... Dated this the 9th day of February, 2011. J U D G M E N T Ramachandran Nair, J. These Writ Appeals are filed against the common judgment of the learned Single Judge setting aside the order of supercession of the Managing Committee of the 1st respondent Society. By virtue of the judgment, the Managing Committee continued and on expiry of the term, they relinquished charge also. In fact, it is reported that fresh election is held to the 1st respondent Society and new Managing Committee is in power. Obviously, these Writ Appeals have become infructuous because no purpose will be served even if we reverse the judgment of the learned Single Judge in appeal. Learned Government Pleader raised legal issues decided by the learned Single Judge. Similar appeals filed against the same judgment were dismissed by us by judgment in W.A.No.147/2009 dated 31/03/2010 leaving it open to the appellants in those cases to raise challenge against the legal issues decided in appropriate proceedings. Following the said judgment, we dismiss these Writ W.A.Nos.974 & 1011 of 2010 2 Appeals also leaving it open to the appellants to raise the legal issues in appropriate proceedings, particularly because the appellants have a case that subsequent Division Bench judgment lays down the preposition of law contrary to what the learned Single Judge has held in the impugned judgment. It is also made clear that the appellants need not follow the legal principles laid down in the impugned judgment as binding on them. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) (BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JUDGE) jg