IS ^-:-;^-^ ^^ ew^ P ^it t,' *•.'•'•••'- ^SS"'^^" IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. ~f^^ /2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ,1] D.S. Kshatri, S/o. late Shri Ratan Singh, aged about 54 years, R/o. irrigation colony, F-2, Rajnandgaon, Dist. Rajnangdaon, (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretai'y, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ^ 2] Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division, Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) -3] P.K. Sahu, Sub-Divisional Officer, Chhirpani, Head Work Sub division No.- I Bodla, Kawardha, District Kawardha, (C.G.) WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -s H< pa? .b?^ Tffss^^^^fs ashok HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRiT PETIT!ON (S) N0. 773 OF 2011 Petitioner D.S. Kshatri Versus ResDondents State of Chhattisaarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Manoj Paranjape, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondents No.1 & 2. Shri N.S.Dhurandhar, Advocate forthe respondent No.3. ORDER ('ORAL) (Passed on 9th day of February, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submit^ that the petitioner does not want to oress this matter on merit, at this stage. However, having regard to the facts situation, which has been stated in the reoresentation dated 3.2.2011. the respondent authorities may be directed to consider hls representation sympatheticaily and pass an aDproDriate order. 2. Shri Roy, learned counse! appearing for the State submits that the reoresentation shail be considered after hearing the respondent No.3 also. 3. Shri Dhuraridhar, !earned counse! appearing for the respondent No.3 has no obiection. ifthe representation ofthe petitioner is considered. 4. In view of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of with a direction to the State authorities to consider the representation of the petitioner after affording an opportunity of hearing to the respondent No.3 also, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. . _-——- —~~~~ Sd/- . Satish K. Asnihotr^^ Jtidge