IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12380 of 2005 M/S Hotel Embassy, Shankar Chowk, Saharsa through Krishna Kumar (one of the partners), son of Rai Bahadur Prasad, Shankar Chowk, P.S. Saharsa, District Saharsa. .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Industrial Development Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Industries, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director of Industries, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. Bihar State Financial Corporation, through the Managing Director, Frazer Road, Patna 4. The Union of India through the Deputy Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Industries (Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion), Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi-110011. … Respondents ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shashi Dhar Jha, Advocate For the Union of India: Mr. Rakesh KIumar Singh, Central Government Counsel For Respondents 1 & 2: A.C. to A.A.G. I ---------. 03/ 25.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State of Bihar and learned counsel for the Union of India. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for directing the respondents to make payment of the admitted capital subsidy of Rs. 3,32,750.00 to the petitioner-Unit along with interest from 14.09.1998 when the payment of the said capital subsidy became due. 3. Although the capital subsidy of Rs. 3,32,750.00 is admitted, but learned counsel for the Union of India submits that only when the State Government sends its proposal to the Union of India, the latter provides the said subsidy to the former and the State Government disburses it to the persons concerned. However, in the instant case the State Government has not sent any such proposal to 2 the Union of India. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State of Bihar submits that after examining the application of the petitioner for payment of the capital subsidy and finding it admissible as per the guidelines of the Union of India for sanction of the central capital subsidy of Rs. 3,32,750.00, a proposal was sent to the Union of India vide letter dated 27.06.2011 (Annexure `A’), but thereafter the Union of India has not confirmed the reimbursement. He further submits that after confirmation of the reimbursement, money was to be disbursed through the Bihar State Financial Corporation. 5. It transpires that due to the aforesaid confusion between the State Government and the Union of India, the petitioner has been unnecessarily put to loss for all those years. In the said circumstances, the Director of Industries, Government of Bihar (respondent no.2) is directed to send a copy of letter dated 27.06.2011 to the Deputy Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Industries (Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion), Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi-110011 within 15 days for confirmation of reimbursement so that further action may be taken by the authorities concerned immediately. The Deputy Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Industries (Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion) (Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi-110011 ( respondent no. 4) is directed to give his response to the aforesaid letter immediately thereafter, not later than 30 days, whereafter, the concerned authorities shall make payment of the required amount along with interest expeditiously without any further delay. 3 6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this writ petition is disposed of. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J.)