1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.750 OF 2009 Nl Forex Limited and another. ... Petitioners Vs. Reserve Bank of India and another ... Respondents Mr. Shyam Mehta i/by M/s. Prakash & Co. for the petitioners. None for the respondents. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 5TH MAY, 2009 P.C.: The contention raised by the petitioners in the present writ petition while challenging the order dated 8th December, 2008 is that it does not give any reason and despite their request to the authorities, no reasons have been provided to the petitioners. These are the matters of economic policy. The jurisdiction of the court to interfere in such decision under Article 226 is very limited. However, we do not wish to decide this question at this stage and dispose of this petition with the direction to the respondents to provide reasons to the petitioners for coming to the conclusion which have been stated in the letter dated 18th December, 2008 within four weeks from today. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.