THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.33654 of 2010 DT.31.12.2010 Between: Pinnamaraju Srinivasa Raju … Petitioner And Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Limited, rep.by its Chairman and Managing Director, Hyderabad and another … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Mangena Sri Rama Rao Counsel for respondents: Smt.Jyothi Eswar Gogineni The Court made the following ORDER: ORDER: The petitioner, who is the owner of premises bearing Door No.4-111 in R.S.Nos.281/6 and 281/7 of Vissakoderu Village, Palakodaru Mandal, West Godavari District, filed the present writ petition feeling aggrieved by the inaction of respondent No.2 in considering his representation, dated 27.11.2010. Vide notice, dated 04.10.2010, respondent No.2 has called upon the petitioner to maintain horizontal and vertical clearances from 132KV EHT line passing between location Nos.9 and 10. In reply to the said notice, the petitioner claimed to have submitted his representation, dated 27.11.2010. The petitioner apprehends that without considering the said representation and taking a final decision thereon, respondent No.2 may precipitate action, which may result in damage to his property. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Jyothi Eswar Gogineni, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, I am of the view that before taking further action, respondent No.2 shall consider the petitioner’s representation, take a decision and communicate the same to the petitioner. Respondent No.2 is directed accordingly. Subject to the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.42652 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Date:31.12.2010 VGB