IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 18TH OCTOBER 2011 / 26TH ASWINA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3412 of 2011() ------------------------- CC.386/2009 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, ALUVA .................... (CRIME NO.13/09 OF CHENGAMANADU POLICE STATION) .... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED NO.1 TO 8: --------------------------------------------------------- 1. SUBEESH, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.SOMAN, POULINCHOTTIL HOUSE, CHENGAMANAD. 2. AMAL JITH, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.AYYAPPAN PILLAI, VADAKKA PURATH HOUSE, CHENGAMANAD. 3. SANAL, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.UNNI, KALLUVETTI PARAMBIL, CHENGAMANAD. 4. MANOJ, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O.RAMAN, THATTAM PARAMBIL, PALAPPRASSERY,CHENGAMANAD. 5. SHIJU, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O NARAYANAN, THEMITTATHARA,CHENAMANAD. 6. SANEESH, AGED 20 YEARS, S/O.CHANDRAN, AATTAM PARAMBIL, CHENGAMANAD. 7. SUMESH, AGED 53 YEARS S/O.CHELLAPPAN, KOLLAM PRAMBIL, CHENGAMANAD. 8. VIJEESH CHANDRAN, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.CHANDRASEKHARAN PILLAI, AATTAM PARAMBIL, CHENGAMANAD. BY ADV. SRI.G.SANTHOSH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANTS: -------------------------------------------------------- 1. AJAY KUMAR, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.SUBRAMANYAN, PLACKAL HOUSE,PALLIPPRASSERY, CHENGAMANAD 683 101. 2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031. R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. R.REMA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss CRMC.NO.3412/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEX.A1: COPY OF F.I.R. IN CRIME NO.13/09 OF CHENAMANADU POLICE. ANNEX.A2: COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DTD. 6/07/2011 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss N.K. BALAKRISHNAN,J. ------------------------------------ Crl.M.C. No. 3412 of 2011 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 18th day of October, 2011. O R D E R Petitioners are the accused in CC.386/09 of JFCM – 1, Aluva. The offences alleged against them are under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324 r/w 149 IPC. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in fact it was a political clash between the workers of the political parties. There are two injured persons in this case. Both of them have filed affidavit stating that the matter has been settled out of court and so they do not want to proceed further. Since the dispute is purely personal and the parties have settled the matter, this petition is allowed. Further proceedings in CC.386/09 of JFCM – 1, Aluva is quashed. N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE smvd