IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8286 of 2006 ANJANI KUMAR JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 04.07.2008 The grievance of the petitioner is who is a practicing advocate of the Supreme Court is that despite recommendation in his favour for issuance of license having validity for the entire country, except State of Jammu & Kashmir, way back in the year 2006, no final decision is coming forth in this regard. The reason why the writ came to be filed was because there was total inactivity on the part of the respondents with regard to a bonafide claim of the petitioner. In the counter affidavit of the State a communication shows that recommendation in favour of the petitioner was made way back in the year 2006 but nothing more seems to have been done. In view of the above, the court dispose of the writ application with the direction to the Divisional Commissioner, Munger to take up the case of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders 2 preferably within three months from the date of production of a copy of this order based on the recommendation made in this regard. Mkr. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)