/ GWhI £4 16d J( t1 L Ui4i 1998 in E).Li IioN 15722 O 15735/1998 1. rL. Jyotni .)/o late i. Ltmaswwny 3 yrs. k/ iaay nterprises, i)jo 659 Kaiatageri, t 4 andi kdohalia My sore. 2. asantha , S/o Sampatki amacnandraiah 51 yrs. K/s Gopal alec tricals, .).No.32 “Koustriuona”, Kanakshi tiospital itoad, Kuvempu Nagar, Mysore. 3. K. avi 6/c P. Kannan, 33 yrs. M/ ri Mookabika jec tricals, No.1020 ri Ramapira, ii. $tage i Gross, Mysore. 4. .b. Malllkarjuna.ppa 6/0 basavanna, 3L4. yrs. iectrica1s ).i’o.ç65, ótn Gross c. F block, ktamarisflna iagar, k4ysore, , Mojnmed Kfialeel 6/0 late Ahaiedn dsajn 58 yrs. M/sKamar iec tricals, i).Io.2+9 Fadeent Gircie, LJiayar Mysore. . . 2, . 6. ii.R. .rishna Murthy /o Ra3anna, 38 yrs. t/o A),No,1046, .LL Main S.J,k{ xtoad, Vidyaranya 2uraxn, Mysore-8. 7. Maqubool Pasha /o Rahaman harief 8 yrs. h.R.. 1ec- tricals, ).No.2÷58/1, reKatte treet, iasbkar Mohaila, Mysore. 8. . atnyanrayana /o i.), uboa kSrisnna 29 yrs. Laishzninarayan 1ectricais, JJ.No.90 8th Main, Upp. ovt, primary chooI, Vinayaka nagara, Mysore. 9. 13.S. £iagaraj /o K. idaaiaki, 30 yrs. .)narmasni v’a 1e etri cals JJ.k40.9), 10th Cross iavi1u. .ttoad, 13. iIock auvempunagar, Mysore. 10. e1vaztaju. S/o ‘bi1omina Raj 28 yrs. âe1ara 1ec- tricals, ).4OC5 I Main, Shivayogi Road Gatuhinagar, Mysore. ii, R, Mariaciev Sb Lawanna, 25 yrs. Bhagyalaksbmi .je etricais iJ.No.1+8lLe., tajendra Nagar MainRoad, Mysore. 12. Sira hwnei 8/o AbW1 baD bar 32 yrs. Jictda nec tricals, i).No,115/12 8th Main, S,i. oste1 £oad, Viyaranyapuram Mysore8. . . 3. . 13. Nissar Pasba S/o yed £flutuouddin 3k yrs. Opp.b,R,. Colony, Llunsur £toad iloologally, Mysore-86. 1f. Mohammed ayath /o Monainiiea Yaqub 51 yrs. kahamath iilec tn cals, adamaicm Tippu Circle, Ai.ii Monajia Mysore. ..... Petitioners. (y bni it, Gururajan, dv,) 1, Karnataica. lectnicity hoard 4. Statutory .âoarci having its offices at Cauvery ihavan, ‘Je-9 reptd. by its s4dl. Secretary. 2. bief lectnicL inbpector Gout. of Iaraataka (,R. Circle, ar1galore-1. .,., esporidents, y Sri £L.L.. Gupta, dv,) These W,ks. are filea. under .art,22u of the Con stitution of lnaia, praying tc quasn nnexure C dated 28.1.1998, etc. Ihese w.Ps. coming on for Orders this day, the Ceurt made tne following: oince common questions of fact and law e iavolved in all these writ petitions, they are clubbed, beard and disposed of by this common order. 2, Petitioners in all these writ petitions are licensed electrical Contractors. Ibey are all before this Court in.teralia questioning the legality , or otherwise of the deletion of the words Contractor/ upervisor in Regulation ,02 as aine tided and published in the notification dated 28.1.1998 by the responaent ioard.. Purttaer, they are seeid.ng for a direction to the respondents to maintain the previous requisition form for supply of energy under clause Vi(5) of the cnedule of Indian Llectricity ACt, 1910 aril to dis-continue the usage of the present form that is being supplied by the respondent-hoard which has been produced aS Atinexure ‘A to the writ petltions4 3. In o far as the first relief is concerned, both siies would agree that the issues rai sed in these writ petitions are identical with the issues raised anci considered oy this Court in W.P.800+/1998 disposed of on 23.3.1998. Respectfully following the observations made therein, the first relief sou 6 bt for by the petitionei in these writ peti tior are rejected.. . in so far as second relief that is sount in tkwrit petitions are concerned, the responaent ioari t ztxigh i. s additional eretary has flied an affiaavit. The saiu affidavit reaas as under: . , 5, , filing this Affiiavit plci% on record that it is open to aLl the prospective con sumers in £arnatak while sutmitt lug the printed application seekirg for power supply, to furnish the nse of tne Contractor and other parti culars of the Contract as Annexure to the printed prescribea. form ana the saii nnexure will be eonsiuered as part of the printed prescribed form printed ani supplied.” 5. 1n view of this categorical undertakLng made iy the Actitional Secretary dated 16. 6,1998 of the respondent-Board, in my view, even the second relief sought fr by the petitioners in these writ petitions does not survive for consideration. ccording.Ly, it is rejected. 6. itb these ooservations and directions, tnese writ petitions are J.isposeu of. . ri £i.iL. iupta, learned Counsel is lirectea to file his memo of appearance within six eks from touay. Drdered accordingly. Sd! JUDGE iiihs17O61998 ff( i