IN THE PARSI CHIEF MATRIMONIAL COURT AT BOMBAY SUIT NO.32 OF 2003 Kashmira B. Baladawala.......Plaintiff No.1 Versus Bahmanshaw Baldawala.........Plaintiff No.2 Mr. A.S. Khushrushai for Plaintiff No.1 Ms. F.D. Contractor for Plaintiff No.2. Plaintiff No.1 present in person. Plaintiff No.2 absent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, J. F.I. REBELLO, J. F.I. REBELLO, J. DATE DATE DATE : : : 25th October,2004 P.C.: 1. This is a suit for divorce by mutual consent. The plaintiff No.1 is present in the Court. Plaintiff No.2 is absent. However, an affidavit has been filed explaining as to why he could not remain present. Presence of Plaintiff No.2 exempted. 2. Plaintiff No.1 states that no no force, coercion or undue influence have been exercised on her. Plaintiff No.2 has filed an affidavit reiterating similarly. 3. Exhibit "B" were the consent terms to the plaint. Parties have now submitted Exhibit "B-1" which are the new consent terms and have prayed that decree be passed in terms of the consent terms Exhibit "B-1". Considering the above suit decreed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) and substituted consent terms namely Exhibit "B-1". F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J. REBELLO, J. REBELLO, J.