1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.1710 OF 2006 NO.1710 OF 2006 NO.1710 OF 2006 Prabhudayal Tarachand Tanwar... Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & ors ... Respondents Mr.Ashok Mishra, Advocate for Petitioner Ms.U.V.Kejriwal, A.P.P.for Respondent State CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : J.N.PATEL AND J.N.PATEL AND J.N.PATEL AND SMT.ROSHAN SMT.ROSHAN SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ DALVI, JJ DALVI, JJ DATED DATED DATED : : : 11th September, 2006 11th September, 2006 11th September, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. On the last date, we specifically directed the petitioner that unless he discloses the names of the Police Officers who have advised him to get orders from the Court then they will give him 2 police protection. Our order dated 5th September, 2006 is quite clear. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not keeping well. Well, we can’t help it. We find no merit in the petition particularly when the petitioner is not in a position to disclose the names of the persons from whom he has received threats or who has threatened him of dire consequences if he carries out renovation or re-construction of the structures for which he has due sanction from the competent authority. 2. Petition is dismissed. (Smt (Smt (Smt Roshan Dalvi,J) Roshan Dalvi,J) Roshan Dalvi,J) (J.N.Patel, (J.N.Patel, (J.N.Patel, J) J) J)