F "lw*» iii:s ii: XI-HC—'; ^ sn^i ^i f<<-<i+ 'Sfl ffl^CT *t|i'=h 'ys^ •^lt]<ld'4, »ii1'H<i<c, fqciwy ^ ^^^^o-^olo-] ^ ^flWtT Sh*1ieb sii^i'Ta^ ('^fg^i) ^(araTC^ifp'an^! PBTITIOHJBR Dr, Smt. S}iobha Bist, W/o Shri B.S. Bist, aged about 56 y|ears, R/o F^d-mawati Apartment, 1" Floor, Falt|No. 1-D, Beside S.B.I. CoBectorate Branch, Nejhru Chowk, Distt. Biiaspur (CG) Versus RBSPONDENT8 1. WMT PBTITIOH imDBR ART State ofl Chhatfegarh, fhrough Sccretaiy, Dcpartin(Ent of H%her Education, D.K.S. Bhawanj Mautralaya, Raipiu- (CG) Conunis^ioiier, Directoiate of Higher Educatic^i, Raipiir (CO) lCLES 226 OP THE COHSnTUTIOH OfIHDIA SB: HOM. SHRI DHIREKDRA ItlSHRA. J 3-2-2009 Shil Suiul Olwaui, Adv., Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Gc| Heard. In the instant petition, tt^ of pctitioners case fbr promotion Committee. Leamed counsel for fhe the Gradation Ltet pubUshed bi wouM be evident that the petitioner have been promoted of Geography without consideri^g Learaed coiuisel for thel petitioner has already subnuttep grievance vide Aiuiexure P-4, cf)i^ci4!'i 'vc^ ^^^ <r<i-fc$i< ^aifinsn^H ur tkc pelitioucr. vt. Advocate, for fhe State. dispute relates to non-consideration by the Departmental Piomotion cabdidates (etitfoner submits that finm perusal of the respondents fiiom tnne to tune, it who were doiwn below the ^n fhe post ofprofessor iu the subject the case ofthe petitioner. petitioner further subniits that llic a representation for redressal ofhis |iowever, the repres^ntation nas not XI-HG—78 3H^T ^T f<^<=b •iCTsn^rwiiw ^l '3^ 'c{ww<i, aitil'M'is, (sKniyy Lop. ^3^p-(-40//03 IMCTI wira» :WI,200 SII^T TT5RT (liclfj'!l<*T) TOIIW ^ifBa an^i disposeiB of wifh direction :.<F'« qiFlfepN 'WRif ^ fezt <fa|<^l< ^siRman^sr been decided tiB date. He ^lso prays fhat his petition may bc to fhe respoudents to decide fhe repiiesentatfon ofAnnexure P-+. On fhe other hand, leartied counsel for fhe State submits that in case, the petitioner files tre^h representation aloag wifh a copy of fhe petition and a certified cdjpy of this order before fhe respondcnt No. 1, fhe same sIiaU be con^idcred and decided by him within six weeks, In view of thc submisdion made by learaed counsel for fhe parties, this petitmn is dispo^ed of wifh Uberty to fhe petitioner to make a representation detaUiite his grievances raised in fhfa petitfon along with a copy of the petifion and a certified copy of this oider before the respoudeut No. 1 wjithin 10 days fiom today aad on such representatiou being filed, the by respondent No. 1 •within s thereof. Consequcntty, I.A. No. 1 sainjc shaU be cousidered and decided period of suc wecks firom the receipt staads disposed of. Sd/- Dturendral^tehra Judge