IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No : 1022 of 2008 Between: Smt. G. Renuka, W/o. Venkat Krishna Reddy, aged about 45 years, Plot No. 11, Parkview Enclave, Manovikasnagar, Secunderabad - 500 009 (A.P). ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Sangareddy, Medak District. 2 The Tahasildar, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Ramachandrapuram, Medak District. 3 The Special Deputy Collector, Unit-VII, Outer Ring Road Project, Huda Complex, Tarnaka, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus and to consider the representation dt. 10-12-2007, declaring the action of the respondents in not surveying the land in Sy.No. 209, Kollur Village, Medak District and not demarcating the petitioner's land of an extent of 7000 sq.yds. as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, unreasonable and violative of article 14 and 21 of the constitution of India and to issue a consequential direction to survey the land in Sy.No. 209, Kollur Village, demarcate the petitioner's land and hand over the same to the petitioner and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.SREE RANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.2: G.P. FOR LAND ACQUISITION Standing Counsel for Respondent No.3: Sri Y.Ramachandra The Court made the following : W.P.No.1022 of 2008 ORDER: According to the petitioner she gave a representation on 10.12.2007 requesting the respondent authorities to survey and demarcate her land in an extent of 7000 square yards in Sy.No.209 of Kollur village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Medak District. Since the said representation is not considered the petitioner approached this Court and filed the present writ petition. On instructions, the learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition submits that such a representation of the petitioner was not received by the 2nd respondent. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and since there is a dispute with regard to the aforesaid representation, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation for survey and demarcation of the land in question within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on such representation being made by the petitioner, the 2nd respondent shall consider and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law within a period of four weeks thereafter. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ____________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 19-04-2007 Gsn.