1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1059 OF 2009 Smt. Vandana Nursinh Kelkar. ..Petitioner. v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr.R.G.Panchal for petitioner. Ms.S.V.Gajre, APP for State. Mr.Vikas Shivankar for Respondent No.2. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED :- NOVEMBER 10, 2009. P.C. 1. In deference to the observation made by the Court, Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner would be content if the Petitioner is given liberty to agitate all the grounds raised in the present Petition, to be urged in the appeal to be filed against the final decision of the trial court, if and when occasion arises. Although this request is opposed by the Counsel for the Respondent, in my opinion, in the interest of justice, the Petitioner deserves this liberty. Accordingly, without going into the questions raised in the present Petition, Petitioner is granted liberty to raise the grounds 2 available to him in the appeal to be filed against the final decision of the trial Court. Those grounds will be considered on its own merit by the Appellate Court. The Same are kept open. Petition disposed of accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)