(1) WP. 91.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.91 OF 2010 Ashok Kashinath Walke .. PETITIONER VERSUS Gangabai w/o Ashok Walke .. RESPONDENT Mr. Paresh B. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 13TH JULY, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. The petitioner is husband of the respondent. The learned District Judge, directed the petitioner to pay amount of Rs.2000/- per month as interim maintenance in the proceedings of the Hindu Marriage Petition no.100 of 2008. It appears that the petitioner is employed as Village Talathi. The respondent had filed copy of the certificate of monthly pay of the petitioner and therefore, the learned District Judge held that the petitioner might be earning atleast Rs.10,000/- per month or more. It appears that a separate maintenance allowance at the (2) WP. 91.2010 rate of Rs.400/- was granted to the respondent under section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This aspect is also considered by the learned District Judge. The discretionary order does not call for any interference in the exercise of extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction, inasmuch as there appears no perversity as such. Petition dismissed. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp