IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.DENESAN WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH NOVEMBER 2006 / 24TH KARTHIKA 1928 WP(C).No. 29605 of 2006(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ N.ULLAS, S/O.K.NEELAKANTAN, JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT, KERALA HEAD-LOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD, SUB OFFICE, ATTINGAL, TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE, KERALA HEAD-LOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD, SRM ROAD, ERNAKULAM. 2. SMT.USHA S, JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT, KERALA HEAD-LOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD, MUVATTUPUZHA COMMITTEE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. R1 BY ADV. SRI.BABU KARUKAPPADATH, SC,KHLWWB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/11/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.K.DENESAN, J. ----------------------------- WP(C)No. 29605 OF 2006 ----------------------------- Dated this the 15th November, 2006. JUDGMENT The petitioner is a Junior Superintendent attached to the Kerala Head Load Workers Welfare Board. He is aggrieved by Ext.P2 order passed by the first respondent transferring him from Attingal Sub Office to the office under the control of Moovattupuzha Committee in Ernakulam district. Ext.P2, on the face of it, shows that certain transfers and postings have been done in the exigencies of service. Of course, the petitioner disputes the reasons stated in Ext.P2 and further submits that as far as he is concerned the transfer would visit him with grave consequences. 2. Having heard the counsel for the petitioner and the standing counsel for the first respondent, I feel that the petitioner shall be relegated to the next higher authority who is the Chairman of the first respondent-Board so that all factual aspects highlighted by the petitioner can be gone into and appropriate decision taken. I do not propose to order notice to the second respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of observing that if the petitioner files a representation before the Chairman of the first respondent-Board within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered having regard to the grievance WPC 29605/2006 2 of the petitioner, and appropriate decision taken within three weeks thereafter. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the Chairman of the first respondent for appropriate action. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. K.K.DENESAN Judge jj