Civil Revision No.540 of 2009(O & M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.540 of 2009(O & M) Date of decision 30.1.2009 Neelankshi .....Petitioner versus Dharampal and others .....Respondents Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Kannan. Present: Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. K. Kannan, J (Oral) The compensation directed to be put in bank fixed deposit was sought to be withdrawn on the minor attaining majority on the ground that the amount was necessary for starting business. The Tribunal did not find any specific particulars given about the business and granted the permission of withdrawal of 25%. The petitioner who was unsuccessful in securing the whole amount, in the absence of clear details as to the requirements of the entire amount in deposits, the nature of order passed by the Tribunal permitting only a portion of the amount to be withdrawn cannot be faulted as there is no reason to interfere with this order in revision. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to approach the Tribunal again if they are better particulars for the utilisation of the whole or the part of the amount still retained in bank deposit. Civil Revision No.540 of 2009(O & M) -2- Subject to this liberty the civil revision petition is disposed of. ( K. KANNAN ) JUDGE 30.1.2009 A. Kaundal