[N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’IVI‘ISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No 8794 01' 2003 Bajrang Shanna, $011 of Shri Kasturchand Shama, agad abcut 36 ysam, Prcprietor Mfs Loonkaran 5x, Company, Gudhiyari, Petitioner Pannnr f“ Versus ReSpondenis 1. The Raipur Mumcipai Corpoxajion, a etatutozy bsxLy, mulwy': Ragd, Rawur The Zone bxecuuve Ofncel bone No.1, Kaipur Municipal Corporation, Raipur S‘a e o? r‘hhcrtiogoru, throkgh the becretaly Mlmstxy of Home “Affalrs, DK§ Bhavan, Raipur (b Shyama Devi Ddqa, dged dboui 60 years, widow of Late Badnprasad (Das) Daga, residexu 01 Fla: No o ranshta'Complex, (Mi). Road, Raipur (C.G.) 5. Pmveen Daga aged about 40 years son of Late Badn Das Uaga, res1dent of Uucuvan, R&pur m C ) VlveK Uagd agea about 36 yeare, son of Late Badri Das Daga, resident of Gudiyan‘, Raipur (C.G.) Rajev Daga, agd about 130 years, son of Late Sadr; Das Daga, resideat of Gudiyan', Kaipur (C,G.) Vipiichand Dag“, aged shout 55 years, son of Shri Vahabn Das Uaga, resident of Gudiyari, Raipur (0Q) 9. Shana Devi Daga, widow of Late Narayan Das Daga, resident oi‘Gudivan', Raipur Arvind Daga, aged about 32 we o, sun of 10. Shn' Virdhicnand Daga res1dent of Gudiyari, Raipur (C.G.) 11. Deepak Daga, aged about 45 yeals, son of late Narayan Das Daga, resident— of Gudiyari, Raipur (C.G.} 12. Pxemchand Daga, aged about 45 yealgs son of Shzi Vallabh Das Daga, resident of Gudivan', Raipur (C.G.) Suresh Daga, aged about 35 years, son of Shii Vallabh Das Daga, resident of Gudiyari, Raigur (6G,) (D ()0 ya LO (Wn‘t Petition under Article 226 8a 227 of the Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’bte bhn Satisli K. Agnihotri J) Shri B. P. Sliarma, Advoca“ for the petihoner Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer tor Lue respondent No.3. ¥\ '\ ; AIR 2006 Chiiattisgarhéfa (Passai orL this 13th Day of October, 2008) 1, mamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instnlctions, submits that the petitioner seeks psrmission of this Court to civil suit. in View of Smt. Kumaxi Bai 85 Ant. etc. v. State of Anf. etc.1 aye“ for the respondent] State has no 2. Learned counsel appearing objection. withdrawn 3. 1n View of the above, the peiition is dismissed as M(W)P No. with the abovestated. libeiiy. Consequently, 34 17/2003 is also dismissed. smash K-Ag“"h°t“ 7’ 5 Judge i (mm 5