IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 9TH OCTOBER 2009 / 17TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 25819 of 2009(O) --------------------------------------- EP.390/2007 IN OS.851/2007 of SUB COURT,THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- P.A. GEORGE, AGED 67, S/O.PELLISERRY ANTHONY, PARALAM VILLAGE, AMMADAM DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. BY ADV. MR.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) MR.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ THE POORAM KURIES AND LOANS PVT. LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, THRISSUR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.JIJO PAUL . THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 25819/2009-O APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE SALE NOTICE ISSUED IN EP NO.390/2007 IN O.S. NO.851/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE SUB COURT, THRISSUR DATED 24/08/2009. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.25819 OF 2009 (O) ----------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is the judgment debtor in E.P.No.390 of 2007 in O.S.No.851 of 2007 on the file of the Sub Court, Thrissur. Towards the satisfaction of the decree debt, the immovable properties belonging to the petitioner was attached and steps are being taken to proceed with the sale. At that stage, the petitioner has approached this Court for adjourning the sale. Admitting the writ petition, a conditional order was passed staying further proceedings in execution directing the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.2 lakhs towards the decree debt within a period of four weeks. That order has not been complied with. The respondent/decree holder has entered appearance. From the submissions made, I am not satisfied with the grounds canvassed by the petitioner to postpone the WPC.25819/09 2 sale. Petitioner has not shown any impropriety or irregularity, leave alone illegality in the steps taken for sale to realise the decree debt. The writ petition lacks merit, and it is dismissed. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE prp S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO. OF 2002 () ----------------------------------- Dated this the day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE prp