IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 30TH MARCH 2010 / 9TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 11005 of 2010(A) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ SUSHIJA SUKUMARAN, D/O.SUKUMARAN P.P., AGED 30 YEARS, PUTHIYA PURAYIL, CHOMBALA, BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER PRADEEP KUMAR T.P., SON OF KELAPPAN T.P., AGED 36 YEARS, T.P.HOUSE, CHOMBALA, BADAGARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADVS. MR.E.K.NANDAKUMAR, MR.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR, MR.K.JOHN MATHAI, MR.P.BENNY THOMAS, MR.P.GOPINATH, MR.V.J.ANAND. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOZHIKODE. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOZHIKODE. 4. E.VASU, SON OF KANNAN, KALHARA, CHOMBALA P.O., VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 308. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 11005 of 2010-A - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 30th day of March, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioner is the owner of 44.43 cents of land in R.S. No.96/3 of Chombala Desom of Azhiyoor village in Kozhikode District. The petitioner is desirous of setting up an ice plant in the above property. There were certain objections from local people and by Ext.P1 order the third respondent overruled the objections and found in favour of the petitioner. 2. The objectors filed an appeal as per Ext.P2 in which an interim order has been passed by the Land Revenue Commissioner, a copy of which has been produced as Ext.P4. Seeking to vacate the interim order, the petitioner has filed Ext.P6 which is styled as an I.A. in L.R. (A) No.3/2010. The reply statement filed by the petitioner in the above appeal is produced as Ext.P5. The grievance raised by the petitioner is that the appeal and the petition to vacate the stay has not been posted so far. It is in these circumstances, this writ petition has been filed. 3. There will be a direction to the first respondent to dispose of Ext.P6 application to vacate the stay after hearing the petitioner and the 4th respondent and any other necessary parties, within a period of one month wpc 11005/2010 2 from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/