1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 615/07 (Rajendra Prasad Mathur Vs. State of Rajasthan & Another) Date of Order : 07/02/2007 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. Harish Purohit for the petitioner. BY THE COURT:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner earlier filed S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.525/1992 which came to be decided by this Court on 4.10.2004. The order of this Court dated 4.10.2004 was not complied with by the respondents within reasonable time and therefore, a contempt petition was filed before this Court being S.B.Civil Contempt Petition No.292/05. The contempt petition came to be disposed of on 2.8.2006 finding that the compliance of the order of this Court has been made and the notices were discharged. However, it was made clear that in case the petitioner disputes about the correctness of the calculation, he can separately represent to the authorities. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has disputed the correctness of the calculation made by the respondents while complying with the earlier order dated 4.10.2004 by way of notice through counsel Annex.6 dated 29.11.2006 and the respondents have not considered the representation of the petitioner may be through his counsel. In my view, the writ petition can be disposed of by directing the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner may be in the form of a notice for demand of justice through counsel dated 29.11.2006 Annex.6, within three months from the date of filing of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner may be in the form of a notice for demand of justice through counsel dated 29.11.2006 Annex.6, within three months from the date of filing of certified copy of this order. No costs. (H.R.PANWAR),J. rp