{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3610 OF 2011 Sau.Nirmala w/o Yashwant Kumkar Applicant Versus 1 The State of Maharashtra 2 The Superintendent of Police, Nanded. Respondents Mr.P.D.Suryawanshi, advocate for the applicant. Mr.D.R.Kale, A.P.P. for Respondents. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 28 th November, 2011 PER COURT: 1 The applicant apprehends arrest in Cr.No.24/2011 under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 441 of the Indian Penal Code, registered with Hadgaon Police Station. 2 The applicant runs a Ration Shop. The sum and substance of the contents of the private complaint, which is converted into F.I.R., is that the present applicant, along with accused Mr.Maske, prepared a list of persons whose names are incorporated in the list of persons drawing ration, particularly when those persons were already registered with the shop of co- accused. According to the F.I.R., present applicant had knowledge that the name of ‘A’ person is included in two shops for drawing {2} the ration. Innocence was pleaded by the present applicant by contending that she has nothing to do with the preparation of list of card-holders. This contention is falsified by the text of the F.I.R. 3 In my view, better investigation can be carried out by having custody of the present applicant. Hence, this application is required to be rejected. Criminal Application is rejected. R.Y.GANOO JUDGE adb/cria361011