1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.1821 OF 2005 Pravin B. Patel & Anr. ....Petitioners Versus Municipal Corporation & Gr.Mumbai ....Respondents Mr.Niranjan Pandit with Mr.J. M. Shah for the Petitioner. Ms.Aruna Savla for the Respondents. CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 9TH AUGUST, 2005. P.C. : We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that their representation given to the Executive Engineer, Building Proposals (City), M. M. C. Office, Byculla, Mumbai dated 7th July, 2005 has yet not been decided which is at page 70, Exhibit “G”. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the Corporation submits that the said representation would be decided within six weeks. In 2 view of the statement of the learned counsel for the Corporation, no further directions are necessary in this Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. 3. Status-quo as of today shall be maintained by both the parties for a period of eight weeks from today. CHIEF JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.