IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 15TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 3874 of 2008(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ P.P.VELAYUDHAN, ASSISTANT SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.T.RAVIKUMAR SMT.K.S.SAIRA SRI.A.ANILKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, TRISSUR RANGE, TRISSUR. 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MALAPPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BEJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J --------------------------------- W.P.C.No.3874 OF 2008 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT Challenging Ext.P6, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P7, before the Government and prays that the Government may be directed to consider and take appropriate decision on Ext.P7 within a time frame. 2. Learned Government Pleader submits that petitioner is only entitled to file a review as against Ext.P6 under Rule 36 A of the KPDI Rules. Submission is recorded. In the result, writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P7 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. In the meanwhile petitioner shall file a review petition in the appropriate form in addition to Ext.P7. This shall be considered along Ext.P7 and a decision taken. (V.GIRI, JUDGE) sv.