THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.28298 of 2010 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 and 2. In this writ petition, the petitioners seek a mandamus declaring the action of the second respondent – Station House Officer, Nizamsagar Police Station, Nizamabad District, in registering a case against them by issuing FIR.No.75 of 2010 for the offences under Sections 306, 504 and 506 IPC and Section 16(i) of the Andhra Pradesh Micro Finance Act, 2010, of Nizamsagar Police Station, Nizamabad District. The aforesaid case was registered against the petitioners on the complaint lodged by the third respondent. A perusal of the said complaint indicates that she has taken loan amounts from M/s.Share Micro Finance Limited and was repaying the same regularly. Immediately after a call stated to have been given by the petitioners to the group leader with regard to payment of loan amount, her husband suffered cardiac problem and died. In substance, the allegation against the petitioners is that due to pressure exerted by them for recovery of the loan amounts, her husband suffered cardiac problem and died. Although it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in some matters, where the Andhra Pradesh Micro Finance Institutions (Regulation of Money Lending) Ordinance, 2010, was questioned, interim orders were passed by this Court, so far as the petitioners are concerned, they have not questioned the said Ordinance and merely questioned F.I.R.No.75 of 2010. Though it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that there are absolutely no allegations against the petitioners to register the case against them for the alleged offences under Sections 306, 504 and 506 IPC and Section 16(i) of the Andhra Pradesh Micro Finance Act, 2010, it is for the investigating agency to enquire into the complaint lodged by the third respondent against the petitioners, and even before completion of such investigation, this Court cannot interfere with in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, taking into account the nature of recitals in the complaint lodged by the third respondent, I deem it appropriate that this is a fit case to direct the respondents not to arrest the petitioners till investigation is completed. For the aforesaid reasons, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners till the investigation in FIR.No.75 of 2010 registered against them for the offences under Sections 306, 504 and 506 IPC and Section 16(i) of the Andhra Pradesh Micro Finance Act, 2010, is completed. It is made clear that the investigation be made independently without being influenced by any of the observations made in this order. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 15th NOVEMBER, 2010. Note: issue c.c. tomorrow. kvni