Petitioners Versus /1. Respondents State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural Welfare, / DKS Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur (CG) Collector, Distt. Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) Sub»Divlsional Officer (Revenue), & Prescribed Authority, Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund (CG) Tehsildar & Executive Magistrate, Mahasamund and Presiding Officer, appointed under Rule 4 of Gram Panchayat (———————— Avishwas Prastav) Niyam, 1994 Smt. Nand umari Sahis, W/o Tekam, aged about 33 years, Occupation — Sarpanch, Village Panchayat e Bemcha, P.S. Mahasamund, Tehsil & Distt. Mahasamund (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE \2261227 OF TH CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN‘ THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI [4. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR: CHHATTISGARH w.P.No «4 OF 2006 Rajesh Chandrakar Aged about 35 years, S/o Shri Chhannulal, Occupation — Dy. Sarpanch Village Panchayat — Bem'cha, P.S. Mahasamund, Tehsil & District — Mahasamund (CG) Rajkumar Nirmalkar Aged about 23 years, S/o Nehru Ram Occupation— Panch. Village Panchayat —— Bemcha, P.S. Mahasamund, Tehsil & Distt. Mahasamund (CG) E K HIGH CGU: T OF CHHATTISGARH : 83LAS?UR WRW PETlTiON NO. 2534 OF 2006 (Writ Peiiiion under Article 226/22? of the Constitution of ind3a} smgie Bench : Hon’bia Shri Sa‘a‘sh K. Agnihotri, J. Present:— ShriRSMarhas, Advocate forthe petitioners. \ Shyi $hashank Thakur, Pane! Lawyer for the State/ respondents Na. 1 to 4. Shn Rahul Tamaskar, Advocaie for the respondent No.5. OREER QRAL (Passed on this 29‘ day of August, 201 1) 1. Learned ceunsei appeanng for the petitioners submits that the petition has became infwciuous, as nothing survives for adjudication in ihis mai‘zer. Learneei counsei appearing r’or other side do not conirovert the above-submission. 3. Accordingiv the writ petition is dismissed as having become 1 v iniructuous. i Sd/—V Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok PETmCNERS RajeSh Chandrakar & Ano:her Ver5u$ RESPONDENTS Siate‘ of Chha‘rtisgarh & Others