Petitioner HIQH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petltion (S) No. 1§71of 2308 Smt. Shashi Kiran Tigga, W/o. Shri Bamabas Tigga, aged about 37 yeare, Assistant Teacher, Govt. primary' Sohool, Pandanpani East (Uraon para) Biock Education Office: Raigarh, DistS. Raiaarh ?CG). Resoondents ^ersys 1) State of Chhattisgarti, through tiie Secretary, Sohooi Educationa! Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). 2) Distnct Eduoation Officer, District Raigarh (CG). 3) Block Education Officer, Biock Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG). (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Salish K. Agnihotri, J. Present; Shri Sanjay Patei, oounse! for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate for the State. (Passed on 12-3-ai08) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as leamed counsel appeartng for the respondents/State jointly submit that the faots and question of Saw, involved in the oresent writ petition, are the same asto that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, Durg and another {2(M)8 (11) MP.iR -CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide orderdated 3-4-2006 and the order dated 7-2-2007 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No. 6S7 of 2007 (A.N.V. Satyanarayan and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh aid others). 2) ^ Accordingly, the writ petition is aliowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bhardadwaj (supra) and A.N.V. Satyanarayan (supra), subject to verification of the fact asto whether the petitioner has aoquired B.Ed/D.Ed/B.T.I./M.Ed. Examination Certificate on her own expenses, as per the ^flC^ \ j ^8Ba%-, 1 I. ^~'"~'fl 1 ''kt^^ Raju circulars dated 13-9-1974, 24-12-1998, and 1-3-1999 and further whether she iias been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1:- •;• "I 1