IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 14TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 23RD BHADRA 1929 WP(C).No. 27383 of 2007(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- K.N.SREEKUMAR, AGED 41, S/O. NARAYANAN NAIR, KURUPPANKUNNEL HOUSE, CHOORKULANGARA, PADINJATTUMBHAGOM KARA, ATHIRAMPUZHA VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.J.PAULACHAN RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, KOTTAYAM. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ATHIRAMPUZHA VILLAGE, ETTUMANOOR. 4. ANIL UMMAN, JAYA NILAYAM, NEENDOOR ROAD, ETTUMANOOR P.O. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 27383 OF 2007 ==================== Dated this the 14th day of September, 2007 J U D G M E N T The petitioner had approached this court in WP(C) No. 21770/07, complaining that an application made by him for mutation of his property was not being acted upon. The writ petition was disposed of by Ext.P2 judgment directing to complete the proceedings within two months of date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. 2. Even according to the learned counsel for the writ petitioner, the period prescribed in the judgment is expiring only on 23rd of this month. It is stated that in the meantime, petitioner attempted to produce Exhibits P4 to P8 documents under cover of Ext.P3 representation and that the 2nd respondent is refusing to accept the same. It is on that basis, this writ petition has been filed praying for a direction to the 2nd respondent to accept the documents and WPC 27383/07 : 2 : act upon the same. 3. Now that the 2nd respondent has to comply with the proceedings pursuant to Ext.P2 judgment of this court, the petitioner is entitled to produce whatever documents that he has in the course of enquiry. If he has produced any documents, the 2nd respondent is bound to accept the same and there cannot be any valid reason for his alleged refusal. 4. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing that if the petitioner produces Ext.P3 representation and Exhibits P4 to P8 documents, the same will be accepted by the 2nd respondent and considered at the time when he passes orders in pursuance to Ext.P2 judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp WPC 27383/07 : 3 :