CR No.1305 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CR No.1305 of 2009 Date of decision March 20, 2009 Ram Kishan ....... Petitioner Versus Ashok Mohan and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The application for contempt was directed by the Court below to be taken after the main suit was disposed of. The plaintiff is aggrieved against an order so passed and he is in revision before this Court. 2. The Court below has considered the fact that the suit is of the year 2000 and consideration of contempt petition will cause delay and he has directed therefore the contempt application to be examined subsequent to the disposal of the suit. Learned counsel for the petitioner also points out that the learned Judge made references to the application to be taken up subsequently only because the evidence was not complete in the second contempt application. According to him an earlier application for contempt had gone through the entire phase of evidence and that need not be delayed. It will be for the Court below to CR No.1305 of 2009 2 consider whether it will cause any delay or not. Any discretion exercised by the Court below in a matter like this will not be susceptible for intervention in revision. 2. The revision petition is disposed of accordingly. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 20, 2009 archana