THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.18164 of 2009 DATED: 28.08.2009 Between: Devalla Yanadaiah and another. .. Petitioners. And The District Collector, Pottisreeramulu Nellore District, And others. .. Respondents. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.18164 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners claim that the total extent of the land admeasuring Ac.6.46 cents in Sy.No.134 of Chamdala village, Jaladanki Mandal, Pottisreeramulu Nellore District, is classified as “Anadheenam” in village accounts, and out of the said land, an extent of Ac.4.98 cents was granted in favour of their father Devella Nagaiah and his brothers. It is their case that the land in an extent of Ac.0.54 cents in the aforesaid survey number, which fell to the share of the 1st petitioner from his father, is under dispute in O.S.No.68 of 2005 pending on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kavali, disabling them to cultivate the same and, therefore, they requested the 3rd respondent-Mandal Revenue Officer, Jaladanki, to grant D-form patta in respect of the balance land i.e., the land to an extent of Ac.1.48 cents in the aforesaid survey number (hereinafter referred to as ‘the subject land’) in their favour, which was agreed to by the then Village Officer and also Village elders and the name of the 1st petitioner was entered in the adangal of 1410 F in respect of the subject land. While so, it is their case that on their coming to know that in the contents of the adangal pertaining to the subject land, the description of the 1st petitioner as son of Nagaiah has been substituted as son of Chenchaiah, at the instance of a person whose name is similar to that of the 1st petitioner and that person grabbed the subject land, they complained to the 2nd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, Kavali, on 01.02.2005 bringing to his notice about the said alteration, and the same was taken on record as Land Cell Petition No.13066. It is also the case of the petitioners that though in the said Land Cell Petition, the 3rd respondent, in his report dated 16.06.2006 sent to the District Collector, opined that the petitioners are eligible for grant of assignment of the subject land and that action of assignment will be taken during III Phase of assignment, till date no action has been taken place thereon even though IV and V phases of assignment are over. The main grievance of the petitioners is that in spite of their submitting several representations, including the latest representation dated 08.06.2008, requesting for assignment, the respondents have not responded in that regard. Hence, this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. In the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits, the respondents are directed to consider and dispose of the representation purported to have been filed by the petitioners on 08.06.2008 and pass appropriate orders, as per law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 28.08.2009 v v