1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTON NO. 56 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 484 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 484 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 484 OF 2005 Mrs. Seema Rao ... Petitioner Versus Union of India and Ors. ... Respondents None for Petitioner. Mr. S.S. Pakale for R. No. 1 to 3 in support. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : MARCH 23, 2006 DATED : MARCH 23, 2006 DATED : MARCH 23, 2006 P.C. . This motion has been taken out by the Respondents to clarify the expression "reconsider". While this court disposed of the motion on 22.3.2005, all that it said was to reconsider the case of the Petitioners. There was no direction that the Petitioner should be appointed. The language of the order is clear and requires no further clarification. Motion stands disposed of accordingly. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) 2 (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)