IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17758 of 2010 SUNITA KUMARI, W/O LATE RAJU KUMAR, R/O VILLAGE-CHAUARI GRAM PANCHAYAT BUMUAR, BLOCK- MOHANPUR, P.S.-BARACHATTI, DISTRICT-GAYA. ........PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA. 3. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, GAYA. 4. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, BARACHATTI, DISTRICT-GAYA. 5. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT BUMUAR, BLOCK- MOHANPUR, P.S.-BARACHATTI, DISTRICT-GAYA. 6. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT, BUMUAR, BLOCK-MOHANPUR, P.S.-BARACHATTI, DISTRICT-GAYA. 7. TEELA KUMARI @ TILLA KUMARI, W/O SATYENDRA YADAV, R/O VILLAGE-CHAURI GRAM PANCHAYAT- BUMUAR, BLOCK-MOHANPUR, P.S.-BARACHATTI, DISTRICT-GAYA. .........RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 08.04.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had filed her complaint before the Collector against the selection of respondent no.7 on the ground that she had obtained her appointment as Anganwari Sevika on forged mark-sheets. He refers to Annexure-5, a notice issued by the District Programme Officer, from which it appears that some proceeding was going on before the Collector in the matter. However, he submits that till now no final decision has been taken by the Collector in the matter. He also submit that thereafter petitioner has filed another complaint before 2 the Collector dated 04.12.2008, as contained in Annexure-6. But the same has also remained pending. The writ application was filed on 26.10.2010 with service of two copies of the same in the office of learned Advocate General. However, no counter affidavit has been filed till today. in the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the Collector, Gaya to look into the matter and to proceed with the hearing of the matter expeditiously and decide the same, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order after giving due opportunity to the parties to be heard. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)