IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER MONDAY, THE 30TH JUNE 2008 / 9TH ASHADHA 1930 R.P.No.665 of 2008 IN W.P.(C).NO.17540 OF 2008(S) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).MO.17540/2008 DATED 12/06/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:- ---------------------------------------------------- ADV.M.L. GEORGE, AVE MARIA, ACHANVEETIL ROAD, PACHALAM.P.O, KOCHI-12. BY PARTY-IN-PERSON. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:- ------------------------------------------------ 1. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, EXCISE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. THE SECRETARY, TRIVANDRUM GOLD CLUB, KOWDIYAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R4 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.D.ANIL KUMAR. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:- H.L.DATTU, C.J. & A.K.BASHEER, J. ------------------------------------------------- R.P.No. 665 of 2008 in W.P.(C) No.17540 of 2008 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 30th day of June, 2008 ORDER H.L.Dattu, C.J. This review petition is filed by the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.17540 of 2008, to review the orders passed by this Court on 12th June, 2008. 2. The order came to be passed by us in W.P.(C) No.17540 of 2008 after hearing the party in person, after going through the assertions made in the petition and also the reliefs sought therein. 3. By this review petition, the petitioner intends to re-agitate the matter which has been decided by us on merits. 4. Review petitions are not entertained, unless the petitioner is able to point out any error apparent on the face of the record/decision. At the time of hearing of this review petition, except stating whatever that was said earlier at the time of hearing the writ petition, Review Petitioner is not able to point out any apparent error on the face of record in our order. 5. Therefore, we do not see any error in the order passed R.P.No.665 of 2008 in W.P.(C) No.17540 of 2008 2 by us while disposing of the writ petition. In that view of the matter, we decline to entertain this review petition. 6. Consequently, I.A.No.350 of 2008 also stands rejected. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (A.K.BASHEER) JUDGE vns/dk