1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 191 OF 2009 Bhimanna Mallikarjun Kittad. ...Appellant vs 1. Mailesha Mallikarjun Kittad & ors. ...Respondents Mr. Amit Sale for the appellant. CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 16 TH APRIL, 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard counsel. 2. The suit for partition has been decreed by the trial court and the appeal has been dismissed by the first appellate court. The issues determined by both the courts below are the issues of facts. There is no remote semblance of any issue regarding the law as such, though the counsel submitted that the document called partition deed – Exhibit-61 should have been properly 2 interpreted. No substance is found in the submission in view of the reasoning ascribed by both the courts. The Second Appeal is, therefore, outside the scope of section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure and, as such, is dismissed. (V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.)