(? 0^v IN THE mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BH.ASPUR W. P. N0. 2-(S 60/2004 PETmONER ^^ .^^ ,..:>'-.^"" ^^ RESPONDENTS /^^ BHUSHAN LAL SONBER S/o Chinta ram sonber aged about 42 Years occupation -Assistant Teacher Primari school Potiyadih Dhamtari R/o Village Parastarai District Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS 1. TheStateofC.G. Through the Secretary of Department of School Education D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector Dhamtari(C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Dhamtari 4. Block Education Officer Dhamtari Distt. Dhamtari C.G. 5.Deputy Director Education Department Raipur (C.G.) ^^ \ ^- 's. . ^c- A. ''''/-.. '"'^ ...:•• ^?^^ ^^l^.--^ WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI ETC OR ANY OTHER DIRCTIONS OR ORDER TODO JUSTICE EN THE MATTER I— XI-HC-22 3TT^T'^T f<vii<=h 3T1^T s^^Ich ^f^a Pathak ^ ^^^ f '3^ ^I^IH^I, ^^l^t^Ko, [^<y11^y 31T^?T 'CT^R ^•f-/Jo.^.6^o/^^;tr "^ 200 WRCrTT^H|ch f^si' -SH^T ^<HW^1t?T 20-8-2004 Petitioner bv Shn m<^' ^nU State by Shn V.V.S. Miu-ihy, Dy. Heard. This batch of cases relate to places. • Counsel for the petitioners effected illegally in conzravenlion of law a^ State counsel submitted that the without senrmg notice for demand ofjusti{ Ha\rins he.ard and corxsidered t1 opmion on the merits of the case, in xhe| served if a direction is given to the their grievances and grounds before thel respondents along with a copy of the representation being fued, the State under the law. shall consider and decide law as early as possible preferably withinj t-^nsfer of the petitioners from their respective of the /representation. If any contravent^on notice, the same be considered on its own tnerits Counsel for the petitioners pray thjat yievance of the petitioners remains, theyj under the law. They may avail th.e remedy With the aforesaid observations, Consequently M.W.P.. if any, als^ Certified copy as per mles. Copy to State counsel for complia}ice. chl^f^^ll TfTR^ff *? l^st <p3l^l< ^a^m^^T )<oJ^, fl^ Advocate General. submi{:ted that the transfer of the petitioners has been a|^d policy. State counse.l opposed it. t^etitioners have straightway filed the petitions ^c and representation. jie rival contentions, without expressing a.ny [opmion ofthis Court, ends ofjustice will be peti^ioners to make detailed representation raising [State Govemment/coinpetent authority of the peti^ion and this order, within 10 days, and on such Gove^mnenVcompetent authority of the respondents the same on its own merits in accordance with 1 six weeks firom the date ofreceipt/production of policy or guidelmes is brought to the after the decision ofthe representation ifany may be allowed to avail the remedy available ivaildble under the law.. ds petition stands disposed of. stands disposedof. tNs Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ,...;A-..-. ..„-,.,»., [^ft^ini^