(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1997 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1997 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1997 OF 2004 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. ____ OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. ____ OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. ____ OF 2004 Bombay Municipal Corporation ...Applicant Versus Jalandar D. Mantri & Ors. ...Respondents ..... Mrs. Tejal Katdare with Aplha Jhaveri, h/f N.A. Shaikh, Advocate for Applicant ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 22ND JULY, 2005 DATED: 22ND JULY, 2005 DATED: 22ND JULY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant. 2. The Bombay Municipal Corporation has preferred this application for leave to appeal which has been filed against acquittal of the respondent No.1 i.e. original accused. The learned advocate for the applicant i.e. the Corporation has stated that the respondent No.1 i.e. original accused has expired. She has produced a copy of death certificate. In this view of the matter, this application does not survive and the same is disposed of. *****