BILAsPUB Writ PetitloR (Art.227i No.3238 of 2018 Petltloner Piaintiff Santl Ranjan Chakraborty, about 56 vears Son of Late Shri Keshava Lai Chakraborty, resident of Shodpur Chosj&ls Pargana, R.N.Avenue Wsst Bengal, presentiy reslding at Hemu Nagar, nsar Gudaku Fsctor/, Biiaspur, Tahsii and Distrlct Bilaspur (C.G.). ^^ o^erssrs!nrissirai'< Defendants 1. 2. Versus Smt.Rama Chakraborty, aged 46 years Wife of Shri M.L.Chakraborty, Caste Bengaii, Bramhin, Rssident of Pall, Near Gudakhu Factop/, Shankar Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil and Distrtet Bilaspur (C.G.). Kanti Ranjan D/o Late Keshav Lai Chakrafcortv; EJ^ 4. 6. 7. o. 9. itranlan So"i of Lats Keshav Lai r"hsi Ih/S t&iCi LiUf Sarivani Son of Late Keshav Lal ChaKraborty; Siwani Son of Late Keshav Lai Chakraborty; Bananl Son of Late Ksshav Lai sKrat Ch Respondent No.2 to 6 are rssidents of Near Gudakhu Faotop/, Hemunagar, Bilaspur (C.G.) Ujjawai Das Son of Lsts Mukundial Chakraborty, Resident of Near Gudakhu Factory, Hemunagar, BitesDur (C.G); Prashantak Chakraborty Son of Lste Parimal Chakrabortv; •raveen Chakraborty Son of Late Parima! Chakraborty; Shobha Bhoumlk D/o Late Panmai Chakraborty; Respondent No.7 to 10 are residents of Saphed Khadan, Deorikhurd, Bilaspur s'C.G.) g;tfsn;r. &. 11. Raian Chakraborty; 12. 15. Shanti Lata Bhattacharya D/'o Suresh Chandra Chskraborty; Meera Rani Chakraborty D/o Surssh Chandra Chakrabortv; Safai; Chaterjse D/o Suresi Chandra Chakrabortv: Malti Chaterjee D/o Suresh Chandra Chakraborty: Arti Chakrsborty Chandra Chakrabortv; D/o Respondent No.11 to 16 are Residents of Near Gudakhu Fsctor/, Hemunagar, Bilaspur (C.G.) 17. Food Corporaiion of india, through the Divlsional Msnager, Food Corporation of india, Bllaspur, Tahsli and Dsstrict Btespur (C.G.) (Writ Petition underArticie 227 ofthe Constltution of India) Mr.Basant Dewangan, courisei forthe petitioner. None pressnt for respondents No.1 to 16. t Mn 1. 7 .u.s-'.uupta, counsei tor responaent NO lon'bie (28-11 -2011) 1. 8y thls writ petition under Articie 227 of the Constitution of india the pstitionsr has chalienged the iegaiity and propriety of ths order dated 5.4.2010 passed byths Second Civli Judge Clsss-i, Bilaspur, in Civii Suit N0.316-A/2004, whereby right to adduce evldence of the present petifionsr/piaintiff has been ciosed. 2. i havs heard iearned counsei for the parties, psrused the order impugned and other documents fiied on behalf of ths petitsoner. 3. Learned counss! for the petitioner submits that aithough ampie opportunitles have been given to the peiitioner for adducing evidence, but on account of accidenf he was not in s position io travei from Kolkata to ^ -s Gi^f^af^i ir '5»^>~i yr» •">r'*/^i ir^^t ,f"^i/t^{i'^f^/<i/~iL f /\in»'i^»/^rf*irf^/^t »i^i<^/\S '?t ii^rr^/M' i"i> »»^(Tinir^»TT^'"nT if t-)nsSf9^Ut tS! JU lU caUUiUi/C S?¥fU(S'iitj-C;. I-CTtSiJicU L-vuHo^i iuiU'ca £;UUi;fJl£;u'itgl Ei opportunity js not provided io the petltlGner/'plaintiff, then serlous prejudlce wouid be caused to hsm, aithough he v»as not serious and cautioned. 4. On the other hand, isarned counsei for respondent No.17 submits that in the present case even respondent No.17 fe not necessapy' party. Ampie opportunsties have been given io ths pefitioner to adduce his evidence but reason best known to the pstitioner he has faiied to adduce any -r ! . iUCS ii>/S. 5. CoRsidering the faci that although ihe petitioner was negligent and not serlous, but if one opportunity te not provided io the pefitioner, serious prejudice may be caused to him. S. CoRsequentiy, the writ petition is aiiowed and order closing opportunity of evidence of ihe petitioner is hersby quashed, subject to payment of cost of Rs.4000/- to respondent No.17 within 15 days from todsy. if cost fe pald within the stipu!a{ed iime, ths iria! Court shsii provide one opportunity to ihe pstitloner/piaintjff for examining ths witnesses whom he wishes to examine, within 45 days from today and proceed further In accordance wiih iav/ and decide the case. Parties are directed to remain oresent bsfore the triai Courf cn 15.12.2011. No order as to cosis. ,yi»v^ '^nidi^'^i'i^^n (fi^^ain.ftc* />ii*->y\/^i^/-k^ <-kiF iiii •CTiJiJU^saiiU! i S'i.cai iUS'9 Uiol^ua^TU wi. Sd/- T.P. Sharma ,- judge