WP(C) 1074/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. B. Chetri, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. B huyan, learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that though v arious work orders were issued, though he successfully completed the job allotte d to him and he submitted the bill, the amount of Rs.11,90,082/-, which is due a nd payable, has not been paid. The learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the matter in is sue has already been answered in Tamsher Ali & ors. Vs. State of Assam & Ors, re ported in 2008(4) GLT 1 and accordingly the writ petition may be disposed of, in terms of the directions contained in that judgment. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the directions contained in that decision. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No cost.