1 APPLN 730.11.sxw JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 730 OF 2011 The State of Maharashtra. ... Applicant. V/s. Mr. Vijay Jalindar Pawal & Ors. ... Respondent. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATED : 5th AUGUST 2011. P.C. :- Heard. 2. Perused record more precisely the evidence of PW-1, PW-6 and PW-8. The Trial Court did not believe the evidence of prosecution that the injuries were caused by the accused on the person of the complainant and her brother PW-6. We have perused the injuries noted by the Medical Officer (PW-10) which are mainly in the nature of contusional abrasions. PW-1 has also suffered three contusional abrasion. It is seen that the family relations between the parties are strained. 3. The Trial Court had led the evidence properly. The prosecution could not establish charge against the Respondent. 2 APPLN 730.11.sxw 4. We do not find that the impugned Judgment and Order of the Trial Court requires re-consideration by this Court at the admission stage. 5. We are not inclined to admit the appeal. The application for leave to file appeal is refused. Consequently, appeal is dismissed. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.)