^ KSW 32 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BSLASPUR DIVISIONBENCH CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI H.L. DATTU, CJ& HON'BLESHRIV.K.SHRIVASTAVA,J. Petitjoner Respondents Writ Petition No.1707 of 2006 Dhansai Sahu, Vill. Koiyda, PS Kasdoal, The. Balowdabazar, Distt. Raipur(GG). Vsrsus 1). State of Chhaffisgarh, through Secretary, Deptt. of Home, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (GQ). 2). Superintendent of Police, Raipur 3) Station Mouse Officer, Lawan, Distt.Raipur (CG). , -Present:ShriVinayHarit,DyAdyocateGeneralforttieState. ORALORDER (Passedon29tl'March, 2007} The following oral order of the Court was passed by H.LDattu,CJ. A letter was received by the learned Chief Justice of this institution from one Shri DhansaiSahu. The same is registered as Public tnterest Litigation ("PIL" for short). Notices were ordered to be issued andserved on the respondents. Theyhave fileda detailed counter. In para 5 ofthe counter, theyttavestated asynder: "5, After Cpmpietion of the marg enquiry and recording pf evidence in eourse thereof, when the prima faeie case of commission of the offences alteged was Confirmed a FIR waslodgedon 13/6/2006 thereby, Tegistering aGrimeNo.168/2906undersSction 306/340f the IPC, against Santosh Kumar, S/o Late Nathu Ram Sahu antf 7 Others. On the baste of the FIR ahd the evidenee coltected in courselofmargenquiTyafinalreportunder s3sa a 33 section 173 of the Code of Criminal Proceduredated 31/8/2006 wassenttothe jurisdictional ChiefJudicia] Magistrate Baloda Bazar, resuiting in filing of due Challans after completion of formalitjes on27Y10/2006. Copies of FIRdated 13/6ffi006 and finat reportdated 31/8/2006 areannexedhereto as Annexures—R-3 & R-4 respectively." 2) Sincetherespondentshavetakenactionagainstthepersonswho<s said to have committed the offence agaihst Janak Ram Sahu, these proceedings need not be continued by usfurther. According'y, this writ petitionstands dispesed of. Orderedaccordirigly" Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- V.K.Sbrivastava Judge