^ <^- ^^ ^ HIGH COURTOFCHHATTI8GARHATBILASPUR PETITIONER WRITPETITK>N(8) No.2727M20^ : BabuMSq)ha, Ag€!d53years; S^ Sapaha, Assistaiit Teacher, Govt. Pmisary Sefaool Gondpendri, District Durg (C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS.:,' . , . ' ' . • : 1. The State Government ofChhattisgarh,^^^^T^ Secretaiy, Education & Tribal Departtiient, D.K.8, Bhavaii, Raipur (C.G<) 2. TheDistrict Edueation Officer, Dufg(C.O.) WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTrTUTIQN OB INDIA SB: Hoii'Me Shri Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Present: Shri Somkant Yerma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Oovemmeot Adyocate for fhe State/respondents. QRALORDER (Passed on09th4ayof May, 2008) Witii the consent ofthe parties, the matter is tal^n up fix hearii3g finally. Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitioner as well ^ fbr fhe State/resporidents jointly submit that tihe fact arid^ugstion Qflaw invoh^edjm the presmtwrit petNon are fhe same to that ofin Yashwant Kinnar Bharadwaj Mumcipal CorporatiorL Durg and anbther {2006 (II) MPJR-GG 96), which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006 andtheorder dated 07.02.2007 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 697 of 2007 (A.N.V. Satyanarayan and others v. State of Chhattisgarh& Others). . Accordingly, fhe writ petition is allowed in terms oftite order passed m tiie case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (supra) aiid A.N.V.Satyanarayaii (s^pm), subject to verification of the fact asto \^ieter Ae petltioner te wqyired B.Ed/D.Ed/B-T.I/M.Ed Examination Certificate on Ns ovm expenses as pei tte circulars dated 13.09.1974, 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 andfurtherwhetherhe has beenpaid two advaswe mcremenfs or not. No order asto costs. Armt Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge