IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14313 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 08, 2011 Dr.Sandeep Gupta ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Rakesh Nagpal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has not been granted increment as he has not done a Refresher Course. The petitioner, thus, is seeking directions for the PGIMS, Rohtak to permit him to attend the Refresher Course. The responsibility to detail a person on the Refresher Course is that of the employer. As per the counsel, the respondents have already forwarded the claim of the petitioner to PGIMS, Rohtak, but the Institution has not called the petitioner. It would be appropriate for the petitioner to pursue his case with the respondent-State. It is for the respondent-State to liaison with the PGIMS, Rohtak for enabling the petitioner to attend the Refresher Course. Prima-facie, writ court does not appear to be an appropriate forum for interfering in such like issues. The petitioner, if so advised, may pursue his remedy with the respondent- department. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. August 08, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE