‘ " x'mw» >~’—~<y’ AT ma: iii TEE HiWi' BILASPUR MA. No 13 (I 2(104 Appellant wAhiHya Bai W/Q‘Shri La} Das (Non-AppiieanEW Satnami, ag€d abeut 23 years, R/o ‘ Villagev Uslapur Police Station anci Tehgil Bmetara, Dist : Durg- (CVGJ Bhilai Engimering Corpcration Ltd., Through Its Manager, Bhilai, Dist : Burg-(06.) SmtKamaIa Bai Wfo Shri Law Kunila‘l, aged aboui 45 years, Rfo Khursipar, Balaji Nagar, Viliage zone — H, Bhiiai, Dist ': Burg- (C;G.) APPEAL U/S 30 OF THE WORKMENS COMPENSATION ”ACT 1923 r€»‘%’ blo‘ [€5sr‘ (3c1 W $qi-m a1 20 anéaw (gig-sis) ‘ mm#wm $a§qanée1 mmmanéa ¥_ _ SB: HON. SI-ml JUSTIcE N.K. AGARWAL 8-4-2010 None appears for the appeHant. i é’ Case is called tWLcs. Even then, none appears for the appellant. In the cimumsfanccs, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss the appeal. The appeal is dismissed for non—prosecuu'on. P a sd/- NJCAGARW%L Judge M