IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No : 16034 of 2000 BETWEEN: P.Kotilinga Reddy S/o Veera Reddy, Sivalayam Street, Pasalapudi (PO), Rayavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Employment and Training, Government of Andhra Pradesh, B.R.R.K.Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The District of Employment Officer, East Godavari District Kakinada. 3 The Commissioner, Disabled Welfare, Government of Andhra Pradesh, 6th Floor,Chandra Vihar, M.J.Road, Hyderabad. 4 The AssistantDirector, Disabled Welfare, East Godavari District, Kakinada. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ declaring the action of the second respondent in not registering the name of the petitioner under "Visually Handicapped" category on the rolls of the District Employment Exchange, East Godavari, Kakinada - second respondent herein, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust besides violative of Act No.1 of 1996 i.e., THE PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES, PROTECTION OF RIGHTS AND FULL PARTICIPATION) Act, 1995 and consequently direct the first respondent to register the name of the petitioner under "Visually Handicapped" category in the rolls of the second respondent and issue Employment Registration Certificate forthwith and pass such other order or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.N.SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING The Court made the following : ORDER : It is reported by learned counsel for petitioner that the matter has become infructuous. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 26th November 2008 ajr