WP(C) 1710/2007 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA I have heard Mr. M.K. Choudhury, learned Sr. Counsel, assisted by Mr. C. Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. A.K. Goswami, learne d Sr. Counsel, assisted by Ms. B. Bora, learned counsel for the KAAC. I have als o heard Ms. R. Chakraborty, learned State Counsel for the State respondents. Con sidering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and also th e nature of the order I proposed to pass, no notice need be issued to the respon dent No. 4. The petitioner, who is presently serving as Assistant Engineer under the respondent No. 2 is aggrieved by the order dated 3.4.2007 (Annexure-D), by whic h he has been transferred to Diphu and in his place the respondent No. 5 has bee n posted. Various grounds have been urged towards assailing the impugned order o f transfer. According to the petitioner, his services are indispensable in the p resent place of posting and that he having not completed the normal tenure of 3 years ought not to have been picked up for transfer. It is also the case of the petitioner that, it is difficult for him to carry out the transfer order because of various domestic problems. It appears that the petitioner apprehending transfer had submitted Annex ure-F representation dated 20.8.2006 followed by further representation dated 7. 4.2007 after passing of the impugned order of transfer. Mr. Choudhury, learned S r. Counsel for the petitioner has produced the copy of the letter dated 7.4.2007 by which the Director of Handloom & Textile has requested the Secretary to the Government of Assam of the Department to review the order of transfer. Pursuant to the aforesaid representation and the letter of the Director, the Secretary to the Government of Assam in the Handloom, Textile and Sericultu re Department vide WT Message dated 10.4.2007 has directed the Joint Director to ask the respondent No. 5 not to handover the charge. In view of the above, and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the pa rties, I dispose of the writ petition providing that the respondents shall dispo se of the aforesaid representations submitted by the petitioner taking into acco unt all relevant factors. While examining the case of the petitioner, the offici al respondents shall also associate with the respondent No. 5 and his case shall also be considered. After considering the case of the incumbents in the above manner, approp riate order shall be passed as expeditiously as possible, but at any rate not la ter than 30.4.2007. Till then, status quo as on today shall be maintained. Writ petition is disposed of.