MC 2603/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Ms. S. Seal, learned counsel for the respondent/applicant. Also he ard Mr. D. Das, learned Sr. counsel for the petitioners. By means of this application, the respondent/applicant has prayed for va cation of the order dated 01.07.10 by which it has been provided that while impu gned selection process would go on, but no appointment shall be made to the post s advertised without the leave of this Court. Before passing the said interim order dated 01.07.2010, this Court by or der dated 31.03.2010 issued interim direction staying the operation of the impug ned advertisement dated 10.12.09. However, upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and noticing the facts involved, the said interim order dated 31.03. 2010 was vacated and the respondents were granted liberty to proceed with the pr ocess of direct recruitment as per impugned advertisement. It was also provided that it would open for the respondents to process the case of the petitioners fo r promotion to the post of Assistant Inspect of Exercise, if admissible and perm issible under the rules. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents, it has been shown tha t the quota earmarked for the promotees, i.e. 33 ‰, has been utilised and the posts advertised are meant for direct recruitment. Without expressing any opinion on merit of the contentions raised by eit her parties and in tune with the earlier order passed by this Court on 23.04.201 0, the prayer made in this application is allowed. Interim order passed on 01.07 .2010 stands vacated. However, the respondent/applicant while making the impugne d selection and appointment, if any pursuant thereto, they shall bear in mind th e quota earmarked for the promotees under the rules. Misc. case stands disposed of.