/^ ) IE_TBE_ HIGH COmi OF JUDICAIURE £X BILASPHR (GHH®?1TISCMRH>. ~\'y •'•\^ • WBTT PETITIOM No, ^J-'7^ ^002 PETI'PIONER: BBSPOHDEHTS : ...%i ^" ^ Appa Dey, son of Gopal Chandra Dey, aged about 28 years, resident of village Haldibadi, Chirimiri, P*3. Chirimiri, Tahi Manendragarfa, Dlst: Korea (Chhattisgarh)* Versus 1. Sou-bh Eastern Coalfields Limited: Through Its Chairman-cum-Managin^ Director, Seepat Boad, Bilaspur(C.G) !hief General Nanager, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Bisforampur Area^ P.0» Bishpampur, Dis-fc: Sarguja (C.G). ^ NRIT PETIIIOI_JJNDER ABTICLB 226/227 OF TIffi COHSTiroTION OF INDIA. -^3 K-^ HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURB CHHATTISGARH: BILA8PUR Sing^eBench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agaihotri, J. Petitioner W. P. No. 1017 OP 2002 Appa Dey Versus Respondents Soufh Eastera Coal fields Limited & anofher. Miss Sharmila Siaghai, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Praveen Das, counsel for the respondents, ORAL ORDBR (24th July. 2006) Learaed coiinsel appearing for the pardes adniit fhat fhe facts of fhe present case is identical to that of W.P. No. 131/2001, Saajeev Kumar Smgh & Others Vs. Union of India & Ofhers. The poiat of law iavolved ia bofh fhe petitions is same. It is further subnutted fhat this case is squarely covered by fhe decision offhis Coiirt ia W.P. No. 131/2001, Sanjeev Kumar Singh & Others Vs. Union of India & Ofhers, passed on 23rd Jaauaiy, 2006. Leamed coiinsel appearmg for the petitioner, subinits fhat fhe question of paynient of coinpensation inay also be considered ia accordaace wifh law. In view of fhe above stated subniissions niade by boffa the pardes, fhis petition staads disposed of ia fhe sacae terms as passed ia W.P. No. 131/2001, Sanjeev Kumar Smgh & Others Vs. Urdon oflndia & Others. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge CuO^ i?L