IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34578 of 2010 RAM SWAROOP MAHTO, SON OF SAUBHI MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MAHARNA, POLICE STATION-DHARHARA, DISTRICT-MUNGER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. AYODHYA PRASAD, SON OF LATE SAUKHI MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MAHARNA, POLICE STATION-DHARHARA, DISTRICT-MUNGER. ----------- 3. 21.01.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the cause list, name of counsel for the petitioner was incorrectly mentioned and due to that reason the case wants a notice. It was further submitted that the petitioner counsel was also suffering from Jaundice. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In view of the long set forth cause of restoration petition, restoration petition is allowed. Let Cr. Misc. No. 46744 of 2007 be restored to its original file. Amit ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)