hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7885 OF 2009 State of Maharashtra and Anr. ... Petitioners Versus Shri.Bebilal Mansaram Bahiram ... Respondents Mr. V.A. Sonpal, A panel counsel for State. Mr. C.T. Chandratre for Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & K.K. TATED JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 11, 2009 P.C. The only challenge by the Petitioners as it appears is that the findings recorded by the tribunal is as to equivalence of the two years Civil Draftsman course in Civil Engineer to one year course civil engineer which the Petitioner has not passed. Submission on behalf of the State is that even though P.W.D. Department accepts the same that would not be applicable in so far as irrigation department is concerned as the nature of the work is different. We find all that the learned tribunal has done is to direct the applicants to consider the case of the Petitioner based on G.R. Dated 13.8.2008 and 23.9.2008 on merits. We are therefore, not inclined to consider the nature of the controversy. Hence, Petition rejected. (K.K. TATED, J.) (F,I. REBELLO,J.)