IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 432 of 2010 Date of decision: 15.12.2010. Mohinder Singh …Petitioner. Versus Sadh Ram and another …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Mr. D.S.Nainta, Advocate. For the respondents: None. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) 1. By means of this petition the petitioner, who is the defendant before the learned trial Court, has challenged the order dated 30.10.2010 whereby the learned trial Court has allowed the application filed by the plaintiff under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. 2. By means of the amendment, the petitioner has only sought to add the phrase “the southern edges of” before the words suit land and Khasra numbers in the head note, plaint and in the prayer clause. As held by the learned trial Court this amendment is only explanatory and clarificatory in nature. It does not change the nature of the suit in any manner what-so-ever. Therefore, I find no merit in the petition, which is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. 15th December, 2010 (Deepak Gupta) ™ Judge 1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes.