IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9711 of 1996 RAM PRAVESH RAM SON OF LATE JANGALI RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SHIRI TOLA ARRAH, P.S. ARRAH NAWADA, DISTRICT BHOJPUR. AT PRESENT POSTED AND WORKING AS HEAD LERK AT NAUHATTA BLOCK, P.S. NAUHATTA, ROHTAS. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ROHTAS, SASARAM 3. THE DISTRICT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, ROHTAS HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SASARAM. 4. THE ESTABLISHMENT DEPUTY COLLECTOR, ROHTAS SASARAM ----------- 6 23/11/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Claim of the petitioner that he should be given the pay scale of Rs.2000/- on the basis of increment which became due after the pay revision brought about with effect from 1.1.1986 and the so called calculation made by the respondents being erroneous does not seem to be borne out from the stand taken by the State because calculations made by them on reconsideration comes to Rs.1950/- and the explanation offered by the petitioner has not been accepted on the ground that because of grant of one increment and the date thereof the basic difference is emerging. The Court is convinced with the decision - 2 - rendered by the respondents in this regard and calculation made by the respondents in any manner is not erroneous and miles away from the rules which govern the issue. The issue raised by the petitioner is not borne out by any decision in this regard. This writ application is dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)