1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 916 OF 2009 Shri Krishna Hindu Merchants Club and another ... Petitioners Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others ... Respondents Shri H. Jariwala for the petitioner for the Petitioners Shri Shekhar Ingawle, AGP for respondents 5 to 10 Shri Atul Rajadhyaksha i/by Natgendra Dube for Respondent No.1 Shri K. K. Sanghvi for BMC CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE : 1st December, 2009. P. C. 1. In this petition, the petitioners have challenged the alleged inaction on the part of respondents 1 to 9 to take action against Shree Kunthu Impex Pvt. Ltd.- respondent- 11 herein who, according the petitioners, has occupied a portion of premises of the petitioners for the purpose of running restaurant by name Dilli Gate, without licence and without complying with the terms and conditions of the provisions of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 and the Bombay Police Act, 1951. 2 2. Affidavit in reply is filed by Dr. Chetna Nitil K, Medical Officer, Health Department of respondent no.1. In para (e) of the affidavit in reply it is stated that the respondents have acted in accordance with law and have taken timely action on the complaints made by the petitioners and the eating house activity is closed as on today. It is further stated that the application made by respondent- 11 for reinstatement of licence is also rejected by order dated 16.6.2009. In view of this, the petition does not survive and it is disposed of . 3. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (RANJANA DESAI, J.) jpc/-