IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID MONDAY, THE 1ST AUGUST 2011 / 10TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 5268 of 2011(G) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- DR.LESLIE JOHNY,AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.DR.M.C.JOHNY,MANJALY HOUSE,PUTHUKAD(PO), THORAVA VILLAGE,MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK,THRISSUR DIST, PIN-680301.REPRESENTED BY HIS DR.M.C.JOHNY. BY ADV. MR.SHAJI CHIRAYATH MS.JIJI M. VARKEY RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. ALAGAPPANAGAR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ALAGAPPANAGAR(PO),THRISSUR DISTRICT,PIN-680302 003 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,(SPECIAL GRADE). 2. SECRETARY (SPECIAL GRADE), ALAGAPPANAGAR GRAMA PANCHAYATH,ALAGAPPANAGAR(PO), THRISSUR DISTRICT,PIN-680302. ADV. MR.RENJITH THAMPAN FOR R1-2 MR.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR FOR R1-2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 5268 of 2011(G) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: SETTLEMENT DEED NO.1006/2005 ON THE FILES OF THE SRO, NELLAI. EXT.P2: SETTLEMENT DEED NO.1007/2005 ON THE FILES OF THE SRO, NELLAI. EXT.P3: AWARD IN L.A.C.NO.173/2005 ON THE FILES OF THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, THRISSUR. EXT.P4: CASH RECEIPT NO.66 OF BOOK NO.1105 OF RS.9,241/- FOR BUILDING TAX FOR EXISTING BUILDING. EXT.P5: APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE R2. EXT.P6: SITE PLAN FOR PROPOSED BUILDING. EXT.P7: CASH RECEIPT NO.31 OF BOOK NO.1112 OF RS.3,767/- FOR BUILDING PERMIT FEES AND POSTAGE FOR ISSUING SANCTION. EXT.P8: ORDER ISSUED BY R2 REJECTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMITS. EXT.P9: REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P10: ORDER ISSUED BY THE REVENUE DIVISION OFFICER, THRISSUR, PERMITTING PETITIONER'S PREDECESSOR IN TITLE TO RECLAIM THE WET LAND. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL ....... // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No.5268 Of 2011 ---------------------- Dated this the 1st day of August, 2011. J U D G M E N T When the matter was taken up for final hearing today, the learned counsel on both sides submitted that Ext.P9 representation is pending consideration before the Panchayath. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to consider and dispose of Ext.P9 representation within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. In these circumstances, there will be a direction to the first respondent Panchayath to consider and dispose of Ext.P9 representation, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-