In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-29046 of 2008 (O&M) Hawa Singh Malik ..... Petitioner vs State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Surinder Gandhi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs. Ritu Punj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondents no. 1 to 3, and 6 to 8. Mr. Sachin Kapoor, Advocate, for respondents no. 4, 5, and 9. Mr.Vikrant Sharma, Advocate, for respondent no. 10. Rajesh Bindal J. This is a petition for direction to official-respondents for registration of a case against Inderjit Singh and other officers/ officials of the HUDA as per complaint dated 6.1.2006, Annexure P-1, filed by the petitioner with the Chief Vigilance Officer, HUDA, and to hand over the investigation of the case to the Superintendent of Police, Vigilance Department, Jhajjar, or some other higher authorities. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner approached the Chief Vigilance Officer, HUDA, Panchkula, Director General of Police, Haryana as well as other police officers but no action has been initiated on the representation of the petitioner. Keeping in view the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. and others 2008 (1) RCR (Criminal) 392 such a petition for direction to the police for investigation or registration of FIR could not be entertained as the petitioner has effective alternative remedy under Section 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and as such this Court would not like to interfere in the matter in its extra ordinary jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed, however, with liberty to the petitioner to avail of his alternative remedy in accordance with law. 22.7.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge