IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc.26527-M of 2008 DATE OF DECISION : DECEMBER 15, 2008 SATISH KUMAR @ ROMI ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Shilesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) This petition under Section 439, Code of Criminal Procedure, seeks bail in FIR No.192 dated 18.8.2008 under Sections 379, 411, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, City Kotkapura, District Faridkot. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no document to indicate that the petitioner sold the stolen Alto car. Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from HC Satpal Singh, states that although there is no document to indicate that the petitioner had sold the stolen car, however, during investigation, one Motor Cycle and one Maruti Van have been recovered from the petitioner, which are stolen properties. Criminal Misc.26527-M of 2008 2 I have considered the issue. It is not in dispute that the petitioner is in custody since 18.8.2008; investigation qua the petitioner has already been concluded; recoveries have been effected and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take considerable time. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM, Faridkot. December 15, 2008 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE