1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.02.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Criminal Original Petition(MD)No.95 of 2011 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2011 1. G.A.S.Loganathan 2. Subbaiah 3. Uma 4. Sannuthai ... Petitioners Vs. 1. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District, Crime No.23 of 2008. 2. A.Jamuna Rani ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records pertaining to the charge sheet in C.C.No.70 of 2009 pending before the District Munsif-cum- Judicial Magistrate, Arupukkottai filed by the respondent No.1 in Crime No.23 of 2008 under Section 498(A) of Indian Penal Code r/w. Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. For Petitioners :: M/s. T.Lajapathi Roy For R1 :: Mrs.S.Devasena Govt. Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 :: Mr.Rajesh Kumar O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking to quash the charge sheet in C.C.No.70 of 2009 pending on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Arupukkottai. 2. Heard Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mrs.S.Devasena, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the State and Mr.Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the second respondent. 3. The first petitioner and the second respondent/de- facto complainant are present before this Court with their children and they have admitted the compromise entered into https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 between them. The second respondent/de-facto complainant has filed the compromise memo to that effect. The offences are compoundable in nature. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit in her argument that if the matter has been compromised in between the parties, the matter can be quashed in terms of compromise as the offences are compoundable in nature. 5. Considering the submissions of both the parties as well as the compromise reached in between the first petitioner and the second respondent/de-facto complainant, this Court is inclined to record the compromise and quash the proceedings. Accordingly, the proceedings initiated against the petitioner in C.C.No.70 of 2009 pending on the file of the District Munsif- cum-Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District is hereby quashed. This petition is ordered. Consequengly, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(P&A) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District, 2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3.The District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai akv rl/4c – 16.3.2011 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.95 of 2011 24.02.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/