1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.381 OF 2009 Mr.Satyendra Subedar Singh & Rohit Singh ..... Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ..... Respondents Mr. Saeed Akhtar, Advocate for applicant. Mr. Atul Singh h/f Ashwini Singh,Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. P.A. Pol, APP for State. Coram : Smt. R.P.SondurBaldota, J. Date : 24rd August 2009. PC : 1. This Criminal Revision Application is filed to challenge the order dated 6th May 2009 rejecting the application for discharge filed by the applicant. The impugned order shows that the application was filed after the charges were framed. Therefore the application was not maintainable and the impugned order has been correctly passed. 2. Mr.Akhtar, the learned counsel for the applicant then submits that the charges were framed without hearing the applicant and therefore directions be given to the trial Court for the purpose after setting aside the charges framed. The prayers in the present application relate only to discharge of the applicant. In the circumstance, the Criminal Revision Application is dismissed. (Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J.) 2