IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6302 of 2010 Decided on : 8.12.2010 ___________________________________________________________ Ruby Kaushal … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents. ___________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anil Jaswal, Dy. Advocate General. __________________________________________________________ V.K. Sharma, Judge.(Oral) It shall not be an exaggeration to say that pursuant to rationalization the petitioner, a Trained Graduate Teacher (Arts), has been frequently transferred from one place to another and has been virtually made a rolling stone. Initially she was posted at Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Lambloo, Distt. Hamirpur, from where she was transferred to Dhaneta , then to Una and ultimately to Kakkar, but at none of these places there was any existing vacancy and as such she was not allowed to join. Thus, presently she is availing leave as a matter of compulsion. 2. In view of the above, there will be a direction to respondent No.2 that subject to the petitioner submitting a representation along with copy of this judgment within a week from 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 today indicating therein three possible places of her choice including Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Lambloo, where she could be adjusted appropriately, the said respondent shall consider and take final decision in the matter in accordance with law and justice within next fortnight, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, if so desired. 3. The writ petition, so also the pending application(s), if any stand disposed of in the above terms. Copy dasti. (V.K. Sharma) Judge. 8th December, 2010. (lsp)