IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-6-2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.No.6683 of 2008 The Management State Express Transport Corporation (Tamil Nadu ) Ltd., Pallavan Salai Chennai 2. ... Petitioner Versus 1. The Joint Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation),Chennai. 2. G.Venkatesan .... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the relief of issuance of writ of certiorari to call for the records in A.P.No.24 of 2005 on the file of the first respondent, Chennai and quash the order dated 24.1.2006. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Muniratnam For Respondents : Ms.V.M.Velumani Special Govt. Pleader (R1) Mrs.Malarvizhi Udayakumar (R2) O R D E R The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order of the first respondent in A.P. No. 24 of 2005 dated 24.1.2006. Earlier the second respondent in this writ petition filed W.P.No. 1784 of 2008 for a mandamus to direct the respondent therein, the present writ petitioner viz., State Express Transport Corporation to reinstate him in service pursuant to the order passed by the Joint Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation),Chennai in A.P.No.24 of 2005 dated 24.1.2006. In that writ petition, the respondent therein, who is the present writ petitioner was served notice and in spite of several adjournments there was no representation on behalf of the Transport Corporation and therefore this court passed the following order:- https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ "Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the rejection order dated 24.1.2006 passed by the Joint Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation) Chennai in Approval Petition No.24 of 2005 filed by the respondent herein, this Court is of the view that the respondent has to be directed to reinstate the petitioner in service. Accordingly, the respondent is directed to reinstate the petitioner in service within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms." 2. Since the present writ petitioner, who was the respondent in the earlier writ petition has not taken any steps to defend the case and has accepted the order of this court and also taking note of the fact that no appeal has been filed against the said order, the challenge now made to the order of the first respondent cannot be maintained. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar //True Copy// Sub.Asst.Registrar krr To The Joint Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation),Chennai. 1 cc to Mr. G.Muniratnam, Advocate, Sr.No.34021/11 W.P.No.6683 of 2008 rb(co) pmk.29.6.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/