IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44812 of 2009 1. SATYANARAYAN MANDAL 2. GANGA MANDAL 3. DINESH MANDAL ---- PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --- OPP. PARTY. ----------- 02 10.02.2010 Heard both sides. All the three petitioners had earlier moved this Court for grant of anticipatory bail in a case lodged under diverse Sections of Penal Code including Section 376 of the Penal Code based on a complaint. The said application was considered and the following order was passed: “After some arguments, learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw this application in order to apply for regular bail. Permission is accorded. The application is permitted to be withdrawn. If a prayer for regular bail is made by the petitioner, the same shall be considered on its own merit uninfluenced by the present order.” Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that annexures 8 and 9 were not brought before the Court. It is next contended that in spite of direction of the Court the complainant was not medically examined by the doctor. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court finds that no ground for renewing the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Prayer for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected. 2 Let petitioners surrender before the Court below and apply for regular bail and bring to the notice of all these facts/circumstances to the Court below, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the Court below on their own merit uninfluenced by the present order passed by this Court in the present proceedings. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)