1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.237 OF 2009 Indumati J. Mhatre and Anr. .. Appellants Versus Minister for State (Revenue) & State of Maharashtra and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.G.S.Godbole with S.S.Kanetkar for appellants Mr.S.V.Dhakephalkar for respondent Nos. 5 and 6 Mr.R.M.Patne, AGP for State – Respondent Nos.1, 4 and 7. CORAM : ANIL R. DAVE, C.J. & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 9th April 2010. P.C.: 1] This is an application against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.1122 of 2009. 2] The question involved in the petition was with regard to validity of revenue entries, i.e. R.T.S. Proceedings. 3] After hearing the learned Advocate for appellants, in our opinion, 2 the learned Single Judge was right in observing that the proper course open to the appellant was to file a civil suit for declaration for the reason that the revenue entries do not confer any title upon the parties. 4] We are in agreement with the view expressed by the learned Single Judge. Moreover, in our opinion, the petition was decided under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and therefore, this appeal is not maintainable under clause 15 of the Letters Patent. 5] Needless to say that the observations of the learned Single Judge or any other authority would not be considered by the Civil Judge, if a suit is filed by any of the parties for declaration and the suit shall be decided on the basis of evidence adduced before the Court. 6] The appeal disposed of as dismissed. No costs. ( CHIEF JUSTICE ) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)