1 Criminal Application No.555/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.555 OF 2011 Ku. Jyoti d/o Prakash Shelke ... APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & anr. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri S.R. Dheple, Advocate for applicant Shri K.S. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent No.1. Shri N.S. Ghanekar, Advocate holding for Shri N.G. Shah, Advocate for respondent No.2. ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 7th April, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard finally. Cancellation of bail is sought on the ground that the respondent has harassed the complainant/ prosecutrix. According to Mr. Ghanekar, the N.C. report is false and intentionally filed to prepare the base for filing application, seeking cancellation of bail. He submits that, relative of prosecutrix is in police and he is virtually harassing the respondent. 2. Mr. Dheple submits that one of the relation of the respondent is driver in Police Department. 2 Criminal Application No.555/2011 Considering the stage of the matter, as charge sheet is filed and as per the record, the respondent has attended the police station, complied with the conditions imposed, it appears that, in order to ensure custody of the accused/ respondent, present attempt is made. However, respondent shall not directly or indirectly influence or pressurise or harass the prosecutrix. He shall not attempt to interact with her. Application rejected. Statement of Mr. Ghanekar that till conclusion of trial the accused/ respondent shall not stay in the house at Pachod and he will be at Aurangabad, however, shall be attending his pursuits in the hotel at Pachod, is accepted. Application finally disposed of. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cri555.11