IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43269 of 2010 NANDLAL CHAUDHARY, SON OF DAMODAR CHOUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.12.2010 By an order dated 9.8.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. 18130 of 2010, the petitioner was required to furnish his father or mother’s surety but since the father is an accused in the present case, he cannot stand surety and the mother is traceless. Therefore, the order of bail is frustrated. Now the petitioner prays that the mother-in-law be substituted as a bailor. The prayer is allowed. The order dated 9.8.2010 is modified to that extent. Let this order be communicated to the court of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-V, Samastipur, in Sessions Trial No. 97 of 2010 arising out of Tajpur P.S. Case No. 341 of 2009, through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)