IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2010 / 20TH JYAISTHA 1932 Crl.MC.No. 1883 of 2010() ------------------------- (CRIME No.313/2009 OF MALAYINKEEZHU POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT) PETITIONER: ACCUSED ---------------------- CHANDRA BABU, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O. THANKAPPAN, KUNNUVILAKATHU MELEPUTHEN VEEDU, MACHEL.P.O, MALAYINKEEZHU, TRIVANDRUM, NOW RESIDING AT INATTADITHALAKKAL MELE PUTHEN VEEDU, KIZHAKKUMKARA, MANVILA, KULATHOOR.P.O. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.K.SATHEESH KUMAR RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITIK THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/06/2010, THE COURT ON 10/06/2010 PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------------------- Crl.M.C.No.1883 of 2010 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of June, 2010 ORDER Petitioner who is the accused in Crime No.313/2009 of Malayinkeezhu Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram for offence punishable under Section 308 I.P.C. seeks a direction to the Magistrate to release the petitioner on bail on the date of his surrender itself. 2. Admittedly, non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. The circumstances under which those non-bailable warrants of arrest came to be issued against the petitioner are not discernible to this Court. It is only proper that the petitioner surrenders before the J.F.C.M. and seeks regular bail. Accordingly, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of permitting the petitioner to surrender before the learned Magistrate and file an application for regular bail within a period of two weeks from today. In case, the petitioner complies with the above condition, his bail application shall be considered and disposed of on merits preferably on the Crl.M.C.No.1883/2010 : 2 : same date on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of any non-bailable warrants, if any, against him and after considering the explanation offered by the petitioner for his previous non-appearance and also after considering the fact that the co-accused in the case have been acquitted after trial. Dated this the 1st day of June, 2010 V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj