THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU C.M.A.Nos. 4823 of 2004 and 4824 of 2004 COMMON JUDGMENT: Both these appeals arise out of the order and decree passed in O.P. Nos. 709 of 2001 and 710 of 2001 respectively, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-learned District Judge, Cuddapah, dated 10.5.2004, whereunder liability to pay compensation was saddled on the appellants along with owner of the vehicle, jointly and severally. Appellant in both these appeals is the Oriental Insurance Company Limited. The main contention of the appellant-Insurance Company is that since the conditions of the Insurance Policy have been violated by the insured, it cannot be saddled with any liability to pay compensation and, therefore, the Tribunal erred in directing the appellant-Insurance Company to pay compensation, along with the owner of the vehicle. There is no necessity of going into all the details. The very same question has been decided by this Court, today, vide judgment rendered in C.M.A. No. 4286 of 2003, whereunder it was held that the Insurance Company is also liable to pay compensation along with owner and driver of the vehicle, jointly and severally, and that the Insurance Company shall first pay compensation and then recover the same from other respondents. Since the issue involved in these appeals is covered by the judgment rendered in C.M.A. No. 4286 of 2003 dated 30.4.2010, both these appeals are liable to be dismissed and they are accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU. Date: 30.4.2010.