IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15257 of 2004 Saharsa Zila Khadi Gramodyog Sangh, D.B. Road, District – Saharsa, through its Administrator ----- Petitioner Versus 1. State Bank of India, Agwanpur Branch, Saharsa, District Saharsa. 2. The Commissioner, Khadi and Village Industries Commission, ‘Gramodyoga’ Birla Road, Vile Parle (West) Mumbai-400056. 3. D.R.D.A. Saharsa, through Deputy Development Commissioner, Saharsa, Government of Bihar (Vikash Bhawan) Saharsa Collectoriate, Saharsa. 4. The Presiding Officer, D.R.T., Patna. 5. The Recovery Officer, D.R.T., Patna. ------- Respondents For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For State Bank of India : Mrs. Nilu Agrawal For D.R.D.A. : Satyeshwar Prasad (Asst. Counsel to G.P.-9) For K.V.I.C. : Mr. Dhanendra Chaubey ----------- 5. 20.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State of Bank of India (respondent No.1), learned counsel for the District Rural Development Agency, Saharsa (respondent No.3) and learned counsel for Khadi and Village Industries Commission (respondent No.2). 2. This writ petition has been filed for quashing order dated 8.4.2002 (Annexure 2) by which the Debt Recovery Tribunal decided O.A. No. 45 of 2000 in favour of the State Bank of India (respondent No.1) and also for 2 quashing orders dated 26.4.2004 and 15.7.2004 (Annexure 3 series) passed by the Recovery Officer in R.P. No. 110 of 2002 and for other ancillary reliefs. 3. It is stated that the petitioner is a cooperative society constituted on no profit no loss basis for manufacturing and selling finished items and other materials of Khadi and for spreading Khadi revolution in the State of Bihar under the guidelines of Khadi and Village Industries Commission. It is also claimed that loan was given by the bank to the weavers and spinners for the said purpose and the petitioner’s son was to supply raw materials to the said weavers and spinners. 4. Considering the entire matter in detail, the points raised by learned counsel for the respondents as well as the penedency of this writ petition since 2004, this Court deems it fit and proper to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Recovery Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Patna (respondent No.5) to dispose of the R.P. Case No. 110 of 2002 arising out of O.A. No. 45 of 2000 expeditiously preferably, within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order positively. 5. In the meantime, the authorities of the State Bank of India, Agwanpur Branch, Saharsa (respondent no.1) is directed to furnish within one month the details of loan amount given to the person concerned and also to 3 furnish the details with regard to the refund of the loan amount by the respective farmers because some amount of loan as claimed by the petitioner has already been adjusted by the bank before the recovery officer in the aforesaid R.P. case. 6. If the petitioner is aggrieved by order of the recovery officer he will be entitled to challenge it before an appropriate forum. With the aforesaid directions this writ petition is disposed of. S.S. ( S.N. Hussain, J. )