$-13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS (OS) 1354/2008 LA. Nos.8364/2008 & 4401/2010 MICROSOFTCORPORATION& ORS Through:Mr. NishchalAnand,Advocate. versus % COMPAREINFOBASELTD. & ORS Through:Mr. SaurabhPrakashwith Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLEMR. JUSTICES. RAVINDRABHAT ORDER 09.04.2010 Plaintiffs Defendants I A No. 4401/2010(0-23. R-3 CPC) It is ajointapplicationfiled underOrder-23,Rule-3 CPC requestingthe Courtto record the compromise, terms of which are spelt out in paragraph Nos.2-9 of the application. The applicationis supported by the affidavitof plaintiffsconstituted attorneyand ManagingDirector/ChiefExecutiveOfficerofthe defendantcompanywho has deposed on behalfof all the defendants. The letter of authority/Resolutionof the defendantsauthorizingthe said ManagingDirectorhas been enclosed along with the application. Acopy of the order of Court dated 7.4.2008 allowing the petition for compromise arrangement in respect of the erstwhile company known as Turnkey SoftwareProjectsLimitedhas also annexedto the application. Havingregardto the terms,the Courtis satisfiedthatthe partieshaveenteredinto Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified a lawful compromise. LA. No.4401/2010 is allowed. rs (OS^ 1354/2008 In view of the order made today in I.A. No.4401/2010,the Suit is decreed in termsofparagraphs2-9ofthe suchapplicationread withparagraph-57(b), (c) &(d) of the plaint. The defendanthas handed over post dated cheque for the sum agreed i.e. 4.5 Lakhs, to the plaintiff. The suit is decreed in the above terms. All the pending applicationsare also 0^ disposedof. APRIL 09,2010 /vd/ S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J <6(6.) ^ >!,.>. jV -h-IVi-X ^ S-7 fk'\ :(C) h iV). $~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS (OS) 1354/2008 MICROSOFT CORPORATION AND ORS. Plaintiff Through:Mr. NishchalAnand,Advocate. versus COMPARE INFOBASE LTD. AND ORS. Defendant Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT ORDER % 25.02.2011 Havingconsideredthe compromiseapplication-1.A.No.4401/2010,itis clarified thatthe suitwas decreedintermsofparagraph-2-9ofthe applicationread withparagraph 57 (a) &(e) ofthe plaint.Adecreeshallbe drawnin termsofthis clarification. No further orders are called for. FEBRUARY 25,2011 /vks/ S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J