1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.224 OF 2010 Padmakar Babulal Jain .. Applicant -versus The State of Maharashtra and anr .. Respondents. Mr. B.G. Rajput, for the Applicant. Ms S.V. Gajare, APP for the respondent No.1 State. CORAM: J. H. BHATIA, J. DATED: 12th July, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The prosecution has already filed a report or chargesheet under section 173 of Criminal Procedure Code and copy of chargesheet and the statements of the witnesses relied upon by the prosecution are already supplied to the accused person as per provisions of section 208 of the Code. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant contends that the police have also recorded statement of in all 168 candidates and he wants the list of those 168 candidates to be supplied to him. This application was rejected. The prosecution is bound to supply the statement of the witnesses which the prosecution seeks to rely ren224of10.sxw 2 upon. If the prosecution does not want to rely on evidence of any person who is not cited as “witness”, it is not bound to supply the information about such person. If the accused wants to rely on them in the defence, the accused may examine such person. There is no merit in the revision application. 3. Revision application stands rejected. (J. H. BHATIA, J.) ren224of10.sxw