IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17946 of 2010 PRAMOD SHARMA @ PRAMOD KUMAR SHARMA, SON OF LATE GHOLTU SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 376, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that now the matter has been compromised between the parties and the victim has married the petitioner, in support of which a petition was filed by the parties as Annexure-2, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Purnea, in Sessions Trial No. 816 of 2009 arising out of K. Nagar P.S. Case No. 210 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given 2 dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. The Magistrate before releasing the petitioner on bail will notice the informant and confirm that she has filed the compromise petition before the court below. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)