IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 7TH JANUARY 2008 / 17TH POUSHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 17 of 2008(S) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.24397/2004 Dated 09/09/2005 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC --------------------------------------------- K.RADHAMANY, W/O.CHANDRAN, AGED 46 YEARS, SWEEPER, NILAMEL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, NILAMEL (PO), KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS IN WPC ------------------------------- 1. T.K.JOSE, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENTS, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. A.AJITH KUMAR, IAS AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF PANCHAYATS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SRI.RAVI NAIR, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT, KOLLAM. 4. SHAJO BHONSLE, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS SECRETARY, NILAMEL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, NILAMEL (PO), KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER BIJOY CHANDRAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- Contempt Case (C).17/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 7th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT Even if the contention of the Petitioner as regards the correctness of Annexure-V order is accepted, I am of the view that no proceedings under the contempt of Courts Act could be initiated on the basis of Annexure-V. At the same time, I make it clear that the Petitioner has right to take appropriate steps in relation to Annexure- V. Subject to this right, the Contempt of Court Case is closed. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs