^^ C^rl€01/- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (0 N0. f 2 5^/2007 PETITIONER \°..¥ -^K ^w-'l yi.' ^' «'l~ -fe RESPONDENTS ^' ^p^ - i^-o ^Q^' ^5.^0> y / Mankunwar Meshram, W/o. Mahendra Singh Meshram Aged about 26 years, R/o. Village Bittatola, Village Panchayat Dewargaon, Teshil Pendra Road, Dista-ict Bilaspur (CG.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Woman & Child Welfare Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. 2. The Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.). 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pendra Road, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 4. The Block Development Officer, Woman 8s Child Welfare Department, Pendra Road, Dista-ict Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Smt. Anita Agariya, W/o. Arvind Kumar Agariya, Aged about 26 years, R/o. Village Dhauramuda, Village Panchayat Dewargaon, Tahsil Pendra Road, District Bilaspur (C.G.) e •• ..^.. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ORDER/DIRECTIONS IN NATURE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ^- "^TS /^r^'iTOifTL fV^ i^X.S'13 A Tw"'r''¥&(r^ AT»13 A ?TI 13>TI"i S.B. : HON'BL WRlTJ^ETtTlQN_^INI)1235_of20M Mankunwar Mesbraffl. versus Others. '-•'s' ;eat : Shri Ashok Soni Advocste for the petitioner Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Govemment Advocate for tfae respondent no. 1 to 4. ,.^ „„ 1 Et ^f (Passed on Ist ofMarch, 2007) f— *- 1. Tbe petitioaer in this petition has challeriged the appointment of respondent no. 5 on tfae post ofAngan Badi Worker at Angan Badi Center tohijhorki, Village Panchayat Dewargaon, District Bilaspur, Chfaattisgarh on the ground that the relative ofthe respondeot ao. 5 «.e.the fatfaer in law, is a goveroment servant being a L.iaeman. Thus, the respondent no. 5 is not qualified for appointmeat on the post of Angan Badi worker, as per Aagan Badi scheme, 2. Be that as it may, without expressia on merit, the Collector, Bilaspw is dira made by the petitioner and pass ;anbadi scheme and ]aw. any opiaion on facts as wel! as to look into the aBegstion order in accordance with -2- 3. The writ petition is accordmgly disposed of. No order as to eosts. 4. Consequently, M(W)P no. 803/2007, application for interim reliet, also stands disposed of. Amit Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge