IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 5569/2008 Decided on:30.7.2010 _____________________________________________ Manju Devi. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Nemo For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. Advocate General. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that respondents have not made appointments to the post in question in accordance with law. 2. Mr. R.K. Sharma, learned Senior Additional Advocate General submits that the suitability of the candidates was adjudged by a duly constituted Selection Committee, however, the petitioner was not found suitable. Moreover, on the recommendations of the Selection Committee, the candidates were selected and appointed 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 but the petitioner has not added them as party-respondent. In view of this no effective relief can be granted to the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed on the ground of non-joinder of necessary parties and further that the petitioner has attained the age of 50 years, no effective relief can be granted in her favour. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 30.7.2010 *awasthi*