1 APL 200.11.sxw JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 200 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 201 OF 2011 Mr. Vinod Kumar Pittie & Ors. ... Applicants. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. Milind Desai i/b. Mr. Prashant Parsurampuria for the Applicants. Mr. S.A. Shaikh, APP for the State. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 18th AUGUST 2011. P.C. :- Heard learned Counsel for the Accused/Applicant. 2. By order dated 4.3.2011 in Revision Application No.229 of 2011, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, while allowing the revision directed the present Applicants to deposit an amount of Rs.10,000/- against forfeiture of their bail bond and cost Rs.5,000/- towards the costs for delaying the proceeding in terms of Section 446, 309 of Cr.P.C. Personal bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with separate surety bond in like amount was directed. The order was to be complied upto 7th March 2011 before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate. The learned Judge also informed, if 2 APL 200.11.sxw the Applicants herein failed to comply the directions, the order of cancellation of Non Bailable Warrant be deemed to be vacated. 3. Thereafter, the learned Judge was approached by the Applicants herein on 8th March 2011 informing that due to time constraints and delay in getting certified copy of the order, they could not comply the directions dated 4th March 2011. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, extended time to comply the order till 10th March 2011 and at the same time, the office was directed to supply authenticated copy of the order dated 4th March 2011. 4. It is these orders of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, which are criticized by the Petitioner. Mr. Desai submits, the Applicants are the Directors of the Company. Few of them are permanent resident of Jaipur. It would not be possible in short duration to comply requisition of furnishing separate surety in the sum of Rs.15,000/- 5. The learned Counsel submits that the Petitioner/Applicants are ready to deposit cash of Rs.15,000/- either before the leaned Metropolitan Magistrate or before the learned Sessions Judge till they furnish required surety. 6. Considering above aspects of the matter, the time period extended by the learned Judge dated 8th March 2011, is modified. The Applicant herein to furnish fresh surety as was 3 APL 200.11.sxw directed on 4th March 2011 upto 17th October 2011. In the meantime, the Applicants to furnish cash surety before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate within a week from today. 7. Both the Applications are allowed with the above indications. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)