1 CP-181-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 181 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1577 OF 2004 Mahendra Shivaji Pardeshi ... Petitioner Vs. Chandrabhan Ganpat More ... Respondent Mr. Sachin Chavan i/b. Shriram S.Kulkarni,Advocate, for the petitioner. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 29th June, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. In Writ Petition No.1577 of 2004 between the parties, this Court had passed an order on 14.3.2005 directing the parties not to create any third party interest on the subject land unless leave of this Court is obtained. Writ Petition was admitted, which is still pending. According to the petitioner, a notice dated 23.2.2011 has been issued by one Advocate Ashokrao Namdeorao Thomse, calling objections, if any, in respect of the title of the respondent Chandrabhan, who was petitioner in that petition. According to the learned Counsel, this amounts to contempt of the Court. 3. On perusal of that notice, I am satisfied that the said Advocate had 2 CP-181-11.sxw issued a public notice calling objections, if any, to the title of said Chandrabhan on the suit property. This is only to verify the title. It does not amount to creation of any third party interest nor contempt. The petitioner could conveniently give reply to the said Advocate and inform him about the Court order. Therefore, no case is made out for action for contempt of Court. The Petition stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)