IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 12004 of 2009 Between: C.Parimala D/o. C Subbarayudu Andhra Pradesh Social Welfare Residential(RPRP) School APSWR(RPRP) School Quarters,Madakalavari Palli Badvel,Kadapa District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P.S.W.R.E.I.S rep.by its Secretary Masab Tank,Hyderaad 2 The A.P.S.W.R.E.I.S rep.by its Joint Secretary Zone IV Kadapa 3 The Principal A.P.S.W.R. Madakalavari Palli Badvel,Kadapa District 4 Smt. N.Padmavathi W/o. not known To the petitioner A.P.S.W.R.(RPRP) School Madakalavari Palli Gopavaram (M) Badvel,Kadapa District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue and appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings dt 20-04- 2009 and consequential Memo No.RC No.A/201/TS/09 dt 15-06-2009 issued by the 3rd respondent herein as arbitrary illegal discriminatory colorable exercise of power and contrary to the guidelines framed by the 1st respondent through the Society standing Orders No.13 dt 31-10-1995 apart from being violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.R.REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.12004 OF 2009 ORDER : The petitioner herein is working as Trained Teacher (Mathematics) in A.P. Social Welfare Residential School, Madakalavaripalli, Badvel, Kadapa District. She was allotted a residential quarter in the school campus where she is residing at present. This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the orders passed by the 3rd respondent dated 20.04.2009 and 15.06.2009 whereunder the petitioner was asked to vacate the quarter so as to accommodate the 4th respondent herein as arbitrary and illegal. It is contended that as per the Standing Orders dated 31.10.1995 the petitioner is entitled for allotment of the quarter in question and that the impugned orders are passed in violation of the said standing orders. It is to be noticed that the petitioner has already made a representation dated 5.5.2009 before the 2nd respondent complaining about the alleged high-handed action of the 3rd respondent and requesting to take appropriate action. It is apparent that there is a dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent as to their entitlement for allotment of the quarter in question. Since the rival claim is the subject- matter of enquiry pending before the 2nd respondent, it is for the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders after hearing both the parties and the interference by this Court at this stage is unwarranted. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 5.5.2009 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after due notice to the petitioner as well as the respondents 3 and 4 on or before 1st July, 2009. Till such time, status quo obtaining as on today as to the possession of the quarter in question shall be maintained. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 19.06.2009 mrb