IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.499 of 2008 Panvasiya Devi, W/o Late Dukhan Ram, Resident of Mohalla-Gewalbigha Payeenpar, P.S. Rampur, Distt. Gaya Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Mr. S.K.Tiwary, the Chief Executive Officer (Administrator) Municipal Corporation, Gaya 3. Mr. Triloki Sharma, the Accounts Officer, Municipal Corporation, Gaya 4. Office Superintendent-cum-pension-in-charge, Municipal Corporation, Gaya. ----------- 6. 11.2.2010 It is stated in the show cause that the claims with respect to the deceased husband of the petitioner as also the family pension payable to the petitioner have already been calculated and paid, the details of which are mentioned in paras 10 and 11 of the show cause. In the aforesaid circumstances, the order dated 24.2.2004 under contempt appears to have been complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner raises certain grievances regarding the amount actually due to the petitioner under different heads. So far as the contempt application is concerned, the same is not fit to be proceeded with and it is accordingly dismissed. The petitioner, if aggrieved by the action of the authorities, may assail the same in appropriate proceedings. S. Pandey (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)