1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1439/2009 Vikram Shrimali vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER: 22.7.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. CP Trivedi,for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Bhati, Asstt to AAG. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner was appointed as Shiksha Karmi vide order dated 29th June, 2002. Alongwith him three more persons were appointed. The petitioner and all other persons continued by various orders, but lastly he was appointed vide order dated 23rd July, 2003 alongwith two other Smt. Shabana Bano & Smt. Sangeeta Pareek. The two other candidates' teaching experience was taken as continuous while giving appointment on the post of Prabodak vide order dated 28th Sept., 2008, but the said orders were ignored for giving appointment to the petitioner, therefore, the petitioner has preferred this writ petition. The facts stated above are not disputed by the respondents. In view of the above, the denial of appointment to the petitioner is absolutely illegal and the petitioner is entitled to be given appointment that too from the date when the two other persons Smt. Shabana Bano and Smt. Sangeeta Pareek were 2 given appointment. The petitioner is, therefore, entitled to notional benefit of the service from the date of appointment i.e., 28th Sept., 2008, the appointment order, which was passed for other two persons referred above. Hence, the writ petition of the petitioner is allowed accordingly. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-