IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.1009 of 2009 Bipin Kumar @ Bipin Kumar Singh Versus Ram Padarath Kuer & Ors ---------------------------------- 2 21.12.2011 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. By the impugned order, the appellate court below has rejected the prayer of the appellant no.2 to transpose the appellant no.1 in the category of respondent. The appellant no. 2 has mentioned in his petition for transposition that the appellant no.1 has compromised the case with the respondent. However, it has also been stated in the said petition that the compromise petition filed by the appellant no.1 is not a genuine document. This civil revision application has arisen out of Title Appeal No. 31 0f 2007. In the impugned order, the court below has mentioned the reasons for refusing the prayer to transpose the appellant no.1 in the category of the respondent. As no one has appeared when this revision application has been called out, this revision application is dismissed as not pressed. Md. Ibrarul ( V. Nath, J.)