IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7127 of 2008 DHANOJ SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 03.07.2008 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Informant’s minor daughter was enticed away and thereafter taken to various destinations where the petitioner established physical relationship with her. Submission is that the girl was a consenting party. She has been found to be 18 years of age. She was not a minor on the date of occurrence. When she was refused to marry then the petitioner has been implicated. There appears none to disbelieve the statement of the prosecution case. Considering all this, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly his prayer for bail is rejected. However, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail in the Court below if the informant does not support the prosecution case during the trial in his evidence. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)