$§§€§E§ @Ei‘iw IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(s) No. ‘7)?9 é /2010 Q? / PETITIONER Smf. Ramkali Sunhare (Now KanT), W/o Shri Panchr‘am Kanf, aged about 45 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govf. Middfe School, Rewfokhur‘dl Block Pandariya, Dim Kabirdham (co) VERSUS RESPONDT : 1. Sfafe of Chhah‘isgarh Through :- The Secre‘rary, School Educm‘ion Depar‘rmem‘, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. DisTrlcf Educa’rionpfflcer, Dis’r’r.-‘Kabirdhom (C.G.) 3. Block EducoTion Officer, Block Pandariya, DisTT. Kabirdham (66.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE M CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . M PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER A‘s» menh‘oned in The cause TiTle above. ENS : Hon htivéstava Shri Anil Singh Rajput, cou for the petitioner. n I Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel La er for the State on advance copy‘ Heard. 7 ~ ‘ The petitioner obtained Dipi ma in Teaching Examination in the year 1983-84 and a certificate (Ann xure P—1) was granted. The petitioner was thereafter appointed as; Depu Teacher in the year 1984 and his I services have been regularized vi order dated 24—01 ~1 987 (Annexure P—2). Case of the petitioner is that the Diploma in Teaching Examination is equivalent to the B.Ed./BIT. /D.Ed. qualification, therefore, the petitioner is also entitled to two ad ance increments in view of the order passed by the Supreme Court in t e case of Asha Saxeha vs. State of M.P. & Ors., 2009 (III) MPJR (S 59. It is submitted that claim to this effect has been made by the petit ner by making representation to the District Education Officer. S ’ble Shri Manindra Moha‘ S J. 1 9-07-201 0 in view of foregoing, this direction to the District Educatio Officer to consider and decide the ‘ representation of the petitioner with n a reasonable period from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in ac ordance with law. Sd/— g ff, Mohan Shrivastava Manindra Tumane Judge w Learned State counsel sub '