IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1365 of 2009 Date of decision: 10.3.2009 Sushil Kumar ......Petitioner Versus Sukhdarshan ......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Panwar, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) This is defendant's revision petition challenging the order dated 24.2.2009 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Panchkula whereby while granting leave to defend the suit to the petitioner, a condition of furnishing the bank guarantee has been imposed. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Undisputedly, while granting leave to defend, the trial Court may impose certain conditions. In this case, the trial Court has granted leave to defend to the petitioner, subject to furnishing a Bank guarantee to the tune of Rs.1,25,000/- as security. I find no error of jurisdiction in the impugned order. No interference is called for. Dismissed. March 10, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE