IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 3269 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:17th August, 2011 Ashlam .......Petitioner Versus Laika Begum and another ........Respondents BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.K.Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?Yes/No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No A.N.Jindal, J.(Oral) After scrutinizing the record, it transpires that the maintenance awarded to the respondents @ ` 2500/- per month is quite reasonable and can not be said to be excessive. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. [A.N.JINDAL] JUDGE 17th August, 2011 Shivani Kaushik