1 w994.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.994 OF 2011 Rajendra Shah and Ors. .. Petitioners. v/s Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Anr. .. Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.995 OF 2011 Rajendra Ganapathy and Ors. .. Petitioners. v/s Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Anr. .. Respondents. Ms.Shabana Sothe for the petitioners. Ms.Priti Purandare for respondent no.1. Mr.J.S.Saluja AGP for respondent no.2. CORAM: D.K. DESHMUKH & R.G.KETKAR, JJ DATED : 8TH JUNE 2011 P.C.: 1. By this petition the petitioners’ claims that they are hutmen dwellers in Dharavi and they are protected by the government resolution at Exhibit-A and that they are entitled to be accomodated in Dharavi area itself however the corporation is taking step to relocate them somewhere else. It appears that the corporation had issued notice 2 w994.11 for demolition of the structures occupied by the petitioners and, therefore, the petitioners had filed Writ Petition (Lodging) No.565 of 2011. That petition has been disposed of by the Division Bench of this court by order dated 20th March, 2011. The contentions which are raised in the present petition on the basis of the aforesaid documents at Exhibit-A could have been raised by the petitioners in that writ petition however they were not raised. Learned counsel for the petitioners admits that those contentions were not raised in that writ petition. In our opinion as those grounds could have been raised in that writ petition and were not raised, in view of the settled law those grounds will be deemed to be abandoned by the petitioners. The petitioners cannot, therefore, raise those grounds in this writ petition. The petitions, therefore, cannot be entertained hence they are rejected. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH,J)