... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.185 OF 1992 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Mr V.S.Gokhale i/by Mr B.P. Apte for the Appellants. Mr G.M. Khambete for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Ms Anita A. Agarwal for the Respondent No.3. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : MARCH 31, 2006. DATE : MARCH 31, 2006. DATE : MARCH 31, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Shri Khambete appearing for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 who are the original plaintiffs states that the impugned Decree has been marked as satisfied and now there is no question of execution of the said decree. 2. Shri Gokhale appearing for the Appellants states that he has no instructions in the matter from the Appellants. 3. Statement made by Shri Khambete is accepted. In view of the said statement, First Appeal does not survive and the same ... 2 ... is dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE