IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32546 of 2008 VIVEKA NAND SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 6.1.2009 Heard Mr. B. M. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. in a case under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code with specific allegation of firing a shot from AK-47 rifle so as to killing Umesh Ram. The defence is of false implication on account of enmity with one Anant Singh. The further contention is that the injured, who was examined in para-48 of the case diary, did not name the petitioner as an accused. But, what appears from that paragraph is that the witness may not have witnessed the whole of the occurrence. Regard being had to the fact that the petitioner is the assailant of the deceased, prayer for bail is dismissed. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )