1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Criminal Application No.468 of 2006 In Criminal Application No.2747 of 2006 Pritish Nandy Communications Ltd. Applicant Vs. Shrenik Shah & anr. Respondents Ms.Dimple Shah for applicant. Mr.D.R.More, APP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. August 21, 2007. P.C. . This is an application for condonation of delay in filing an application for leave to appeal under Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C. As per the office report the application is beyond time by 417 days. The respondent no.1 was issued notice and in spite of service, none appears for the said respondent. It is stated that though the complaint was dismissed on 21st March 2005 the applicant came to know about the same on 26th July 2005 and, therefore, an application for certified true copy was made on 5/8/2005. They got the certified copy on 6th August 2005. Initially they had filed the revision application which was not maintainable. 2 . Taking into consideration the facts of this case, I am satisfied that the delay caused deserves to be condoned and hence the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (B.H.MARL