IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No. 191 of 2009 Date of decision : January 08, 2009 Ram Nath, ...... Petitioner (s) v. Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam and others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Naveen Daryal, Advocate for the petitioner. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner states that the claim of the petitioner for second ACP has remained pending with respondent No.2 for the past many years. Learned counsel has restricted his prayer only to the issuance of a direction to the respondents to decide the case of the petitioner. I find the prayer to be justified. In the circumstances, this writ petition is disposed off with a direction to the respondents to decide the case of the petitioner for the grant of second ACP, in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order, within three months of the receipt of a certified copy of this order. ( AJAY TEWARI ) January 08, 2009. JUDGE `kk'