(1) wp1651-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1651 OF 2011 Deepsingh Jagjeetsingh Fauji PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS .... Mr. G.N. Chincholkar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for the respondent/State. .... CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 30th MARCH, 2011 ORAL ORDER : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.1 - Collector to consider the petitioner's complaint dated 5th February, 2011 (Exhibit-F to the writ petition at (2) wp1651-11 page 60) and take appropriate action against respondent Nos. 6 to 11 if the allegations made in the complaint are found to be correct. 3. We have perused the writ petition so also the annexures thereto. Having considered overall facts and circumstances of the case, we are inclined to dispose of this writ petition by issuing the following directions. "Respondent No. 1 shall consider the petitioner's complaint dated 5th February, 2011 (Exhibit-F to the writ petition), within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, and if the allegations made in the complaint against respondent Nos. 6 to 11 are found to be true and correct, he may proceed to take action against those respondents by following the due process of law. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of." (3) wp1651-11 4. Copy of this order, duly authenticated by the Court Shirestedar, be supplied to learned counsel for the parties, on their request. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] NPJ/wp1651-11