IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 1904 of 2010 Between: S.V.Siva Reddy, S/o S.Eswar Reddy, (A-2), ..... Petitioner AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., at Hyderabad. .....Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 438 of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated therewith, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Station House Officer, Tadepalligudem Town Police Station, West Godavari District to release the petitioner on bail in event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.30 of 2010 of Tadepalligudem Town Police Station, West Godavari District, in the interest of justice. The petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed herein, and the orders of the High Court dated 11-3-2010 and 22-03-2010 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri C. Padmanabha Reddy, Senior Counsel representing Sri T.Pradyumna Kumar Reddy, Advocate for the petitioners and the Additional Public Prosecutor, on behalf of Respondent, the Court made the following; ORDER: “The allegation against the petitioner (A-2) is that he along with accused No. 1 has cheated several employees of Vyshya Bank promising sites (plot) to them and after collecting money from them for sites, they have not given the sites. Accused No. 1 was already arrested and released on bail. The contention of Sri C. Padmanabha Reddy, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, is that no doubt the petitioner has collected certain amounts from various persons towards advance of sites and even now he is ready to register the sites in favour of those persons on their depositing the balance amount or else the petitioner is ready to return the money paid by them. The complaint shows that the sites, which were promised to be given to the purchasers, were promised to be given to the purchasers, were, in fact, already sold away by the petitioner and the other accused Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner contends that the above allegation is incorrect.. In the circumstances, the learned Public Prosecutor to verify in detail and report by 02-06-2010 as to the persons that have paid the amounts to the petitioner, the amount paid by them, the sites that were promised to be given to them and not given and whether those sites are still available to enable to arrive at a conclusion as to whether the petitioner has committed any cheating. Post the matter on 02-06-2010, by which time the petitioner shall also get all above details. Till then, the petitioner shall not be arrested.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tadepalligudam, West Godavari District 2. The Station House Officer, Tadepalligudem Town Police Station, West Godavari District 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 4. One CC to Sri T.Pradyumna Kumar Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 5. One Spare Copy BV HIGH COURT PSR.J DATE: 06-04-2010 NOTE: POST THE MATTER ON 02-06-2010 ORDER CRL.P. NO. 1904 OF 2010 PETITIONER SHALL NOT BE ARRESTED DIRECTION DRAFTED: BY BV DATED : 07-04-2010 HIGH COURT PSR.J DATE: 06-04-2010 NOTE: POST THE MATTER ON 02-06-2010 ORDER CRL.P. NO. 1904 OF 2010 PETITIONER SHALL NOT BE ARRESTED DIRECTION