IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 308 OF 2008 (S/S) Sushma Rawat …..Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ………Respondents. Present: Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar Bisht, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand /respondents. Mr. M. S. Bisht, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Vipul Painuly, Advocate for respondent no.5. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.(Oral) Heard Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. Anil Kumar Bisht, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand and Mr. M. S. Bisht, Advocate for respondent no.5. The matter pertains to appointment of “Angan Bari Worker”. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 31.12.2004 whereby the services of the petitioner have been terminated and in her place respondent no. 5 namely Smt. Sangeeta Rawat has been appointed as “Angan Bari Worker” for “Angan Bari Centre- Bawsari, Patti- Bhadura, Tehsil Pratap Nagar, District Tehri Garhwal. The petitioner alleges that since respondent no. 5 is not a member of family living below the poverty line, she could not have been considered for appointment as “Angan Bari Worker” and as such her appointment is liable to be cancelled. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the contention of the petitioner, as it is for the District Programme Officer, Tehri Garhwal who may decide the representation of the petitioner as to her claim as “Angan Bari Worker” for the aforesaid “Angan Bari 2 Centre. The District Programme Officer, Tehri Garhwal before passing any order shall also hear the present incumbent i.e. respondent no. 5 as well. The matter will be disposed of as expeditiously as possible, but definitely within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the District Programme Officer, Tehri Garhwal. With the aforesaid observations, writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 19.9.2011 Kuldeep