g} 1 ‘ \ l i , i ‘ i i i i i HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri H.L. Dattu, CJ. W.P.No. 3838 of‘1992 Bhagwani, aged 33 years, ProprSetor Asha Provision, Station Road, Tilda, Post Nevara, District Raipur‘ PETITIONER Raj Kumar Bhagwani, SID lshwardas i i i Versus ‘Es‘PONDENTs 1r Union of india, through its General Manager, South Eas'fern Raiiway, Garden Reach , Calcutta 2, Divisional Manager, South Eastem m A_.,_~-m.wo~_w o, The petitioner claims that he is the owner of petty shop in village Tilda, l ‘ . ' DistrictRaipur, in this petition, he has sought for the following reliefs : - "(i) issue a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to evict the petitioner forcefully without taking recourse to law. ‘ (ii) direct the respondents not to disturb the petitioner from Carrying ' on the business on the. premises allotted to the petitioner by virtue of Annexure—P/2; (iii) any other writ/writs, direction/directions, ,relief! reiiefs which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances may be‘ granted. ’ ‘ (2) t in my opinion, in exercise of this Court's power under Article 2261227 of the‘Constitution of lndia, normally this Court would not grant order of injunction restraining the respondentsfrom doing a particular act.’ if for any reason, the ‘ , l ]_ i i Railway, Bilaspur, 3. Senior Divisional Engineer, South Eastern Railway, Bilaspur. i ‘ i l i Writ petition under Article 226I22? of the Constitution of lndiat , Present : , Shri Manoj Paranjape, counsel forthe petitioner. Shri PS. Koshy, counsel for the respondents. v O R A L O R D E R (Passed on 13‘“ Aprii, 2007) ; l poissession and enjoyment of the shop in which he is carrying 0n the businese, as me aproriate ivil suit before the aproriate Court, V g$ i cant e . Accordingly, the writ petition is rejected. Order I i In w the’e, the reliefs sought for by the petitioner in this writ ‘ petiton no b granted ed x acbodin rly. i i l i ( t i i h h to pp c pp W § ,(32 i Vie of abov i v