IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32679 of 2010 PAPPU SHARMA & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 08.09.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are languishing in custody since 07.08.2010 in a case registered under Sections 372, 323/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 5 of Immoral Traffic Prevention Act. It is alleged that petitioner nos.1 to 4 negotiated with petitioner nos. 5 and 6 for purchase of a minor daughter of petitioner nos. 5 and 6. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that it was actually the marriage negotiation and the police maliciously instituted the case. Though in 164 Cr. P. C. statement the victim girl has supported the prosecution version but it is submitted that since parents were in custody, the police managed to get the statement recorded to justify the institution of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner nos. 5 and 6 2 undertake to keep the victim girl with full dignity and in affectionate manner and will not allow her to leave the house and settle her marriage unless she attains her majority. If such an affidavit is filed before the learned court below, let the petitioners, namely, Pappu Sharma, Nathu Lal Sharma, Nanhe Lal Sharma, Binda Devi, Akalu Sharma and Tukni Devi be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Katihar, in connection with Azamnagar P.S. Case No. 114 of 2010. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)