IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 7TH JUNE 2010 / 17TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 12194 of 2009(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MUHAMMED BUKHARI, S/O. MUBARAK ABBAS, MUBARAK COMPOUND, P.O. ALAMPADY, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN SRI.PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR SMT.VANDANA MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KASARAGOD POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, KASARAGOD. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KASARAGOD. ADDL. R3 IMPLEADED AS PER ODER DT. 30-4-2009 IN I.A.NO. 5538/09. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K. RAMESH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 12194 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 7th day of June, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext. P2 notice, whereby the petitioner has been directed to produce the JCB belonging to the petitioner on the ground that the JCB has been used for digging earth and transporting the same. I am of opinion that after having issued Ext. P2 notice, the 1st respondent has a duty to take that notice to its logical conclusion. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent among the respondents to take Ext. P2 to its logical conclusion by passing a final order, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. Till then, the interim order passed in this writ petition would continue to be in force. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.