-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.650 OF 1990 APPEAL NO.650 OF 1990 APPEAL NO.650 OF 1990 Satish Ram Narayan Jaju ...Appellant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.R.N.Mishra for the Appellant Mr.S.R.Shinde,A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : DECEMBER 1,2006. : DECEMBER 1,2006. : DECEMBER 1,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: OPERATIVE OPERATIVE OPERATIVE ORDER ORDER ORDER 1. For the reasons separately recorded in the Judgment following is the operative part of the Judgment: i) The order of conviction and sentence of the Appellant dated 1st October 1990 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.624 of 1984 is quashed and set aside and the Appellant is acquitted of the offence under section 392 read with section 397 of the Indian Penal Code. ii) The bail bonds of the Appellant are cancelled. iii) However, the order passed regarding Muddemal property is confirmed. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE