IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 3 of 2010 Raj Kumar …Petitioner. Versus Uttarakhand Power Corporation Ltd. and others. …Respondents. Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate for Mr. I.P. Kohli, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Negi, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J, (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he desires to withdraw the instant writ petition so as to also impugn the action of the respondents in determining the seniority of the petitioner by filing a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. Prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the learned counsel representing respondent nos. 1 and 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action, as stated above. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 25.3.2010 Rathour