^^•/aa2^ 1 IN THE HIGH amRE_QjLJumcaruRE &T HtLASPDR _(_-C».FAI -BCTT_£BTITIorf$tof 2-i ^3^ /2QQS . PETITIONER ^^y ...-•^"'" ..•••• ^y,^ .^•%^.--""' ^"^s^^ A.'-'' ^ »SP'' ^>'' ..•*"' v ,.<-''• ^"' ^^ .^y' IBeelkanth Sahu son o£ Shra. Baraa Singh Saha aged abaut 44 years* wbAing as Xssistant Teacher an the Govt.GJLrls Prlmiry Sctoool* Lengwara resAdeat of TahstL Beda Dlstrl.et Btirg (C.G.). RESPONDBiTS / ^ f*^ '^j* s»' jf<&^m\ ^ ff ^.. / . A * % y-^A^y •j;^?isy. i^£^v^ssf ': '^"^•.V^/^s^-7^"^^ WRSDS -1. The Stste o£ Chhattlsgarb Thi&ughs it' s Secretaryt Sahool EdicatJon D%>artment B.K.S. aisivan, Iteipur (C.G.$ 2. The Distrlct Eiaacation Offloer Bemetara? Dlstrlct Burg (C»G.)« ^ 3, The Bloc3t Ee-reloprapn t Education o£ficer»Bq-netara» Dlstrict Gaog (C.G.). 4«i The prlncipal^ Govt.Glils pramary Sdiool»:Laigwara, Dlstt.Etirg (C.G.5. PETITleKLCN EER ^B'TICLE 226/227 RE^D WITH .MQ'ICLE 14 O? THE COHSTITUTION Q^ IHDIA_,@D_R_ISSSMC3_OF AppHgPRI^^_ WBXT , OSSX.R QR. m^GTJfiB-^SS. XI-HC-78 sn^TTgirR-iJeb (t8IT3n^Tsh^i+ <. .. SM}-^'^._ ^/^ ^ y IIH^I shMIth 3ST •<<wi<fl*i, yiTflti'is, Rirtwy< ^Mf(^^^^ 200 3TT^?T 4acn (lclI^'s««<C) SRirwBfecTsn^r 19$4 Heard Shri Sameer Behar, cit Shri G.K. Beriwal, Deputy 4 copy. Tbe grievance of the petitiojii Assistant Teacher on 18-9-82 and after two years. However, seniority] date of initial apposntment i.e. 18-9-1 the Goyernment is giving seniority ctate oftheir initial appointment. Learned counsel for.the towards the seniorib/ iist Annexure) appointed in the years 1983 and inlt'a! appointment. Learned couns^! petitioner may be al!owed to make be directed to decide the same, objectjon. Havina 'neard counsel for t) circumstances ofthe case, and the case, the petitioner is allov/ed to| copy of this petition & annexures to| from today and in turn, respondenf period of 6Q days from the date of all the points raised by the petitioner[ With the direction afpresaid, fr!! Parties are entitled for certifi^d °bi<it<'i4t-< WR?f ^'te^ rfweR: ^iSri^lTSn^TT kunsel for the petitioner. t.G. for the State/respondents, on ad^nee ler is that the petitioner was appointed as ttiereafter he was confirmed on the said post |is not being given to the petitioner from the p2 whereas, as per the Government Policy, (:o other similarty situated pefsons from the p^titioner drawing the attention of the Court p/2 submitted that the teachers who were 19$4 were given seniority from the date oftheir for the petitioner further submitted that the ^ representation to respondent No.2 and he (:o which counsel for respondents has no |ie parties, having regard to the facts and wit}iout expressing any opinion on the merit of i make a detailed representation along vflth a [respondent No.2 within a period of2 weeks t'io.2 shail decide the representation within a r^ceipt of the representation, after considering in aocordance with [aw. 1|he petition stands disposed of. copyofthisorder. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Juflge P.T.O.