FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1926 OF 2009 [Mr. Dilip B. Rege V/S. Mr. Ramesh Raghunath More & anr.] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court s orders : ’ or directions and Registrar s’ : Court s or Judge s orders ’ ’ orders : ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr. Sandeep K. Shinde, adv.for petitioner. Mrs. S.V. Gajare, APP for State-respondents. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 5th JANUARY, 2010. P.C :- 1. Heard. 2. The order under challenge is inter-locutory. This court need not interfere with the same at this stage. In case, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the final orders on the criminaal complaint in question, then, while challenbging this order, he can raise appropriate pleas including that the agreement which was the subject matter of the dealing/transaction between the parties is not genuine but bogus and forged. All contentions of both sides in that behalf are kept open. The petition is dismissed with this clarification. (JUDGE)