IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36223 of 2010 1. CHHEDI SAH 2. BUDHAN SAH 3. GHANSHYAM SAH ------------------------ PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 13.1.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners are alleged for administering intoxicated substance to complainant’s son and thereafter he was kidnapped. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that originally complaint was lodged which was sent for F.I.R., thoroughly investigated by the I.O. of the case, specifically verified and found complainant’s son presence at Hissar with his family members and pulling rickshaw, so false prosecution was recommended also even then on protest cognizance is taken and petitioners are apprehending their arrest which never can be justified. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten 2 thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in Complaint Case No. 1379 C of 2006, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)