WA 303/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE A. K. GOEL HON’BLE MR JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN This appeal has been preferred against order of learned single Judge dismissing the writ petition of the appellant seeking a direction to allow him to continue to work as Block Accounts Manager beyond the period of his ad hoc appointment. Case of the appellant is that he was appointed on 6.12.2008 on contractu al basis and on 8.12.2009 his services were terminated. Thereafter, he continued to work under oral order but, he was not officially allowed to work, in-spite o f availability of vacancy. Learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition holding that there was no illegality in the order of termination. We have heard Sri R Dhar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs A V erma, learned Standing Counsel for the Health Department. It is not disputed that appointment of the appellant was on contractual basis and on expiry of the period stipulated therein, the services of the appell ant could be terminated without requirement of any notice. This being the positi on, there is no error in the view taken by the learned single Judge. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the post was still vaca nt and some other contractual appointment may be made in which case the appellan t should be given the said appointment. In absence of any right in favour of the appellant, we are unable to int erfere. It is, however, made clear that this order will not debar the appellant from making any application for any future employment in accordance with law. The writ appeal is disposed of accordingly.