1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2312 of 2008 (Dr. Samina d/o Akhtar Ali Khan v. Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Yavatmal, and another) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D. Sinha and A.P. Bhangale, JJ. DATE : 7th August, 2008 Heard Shri F.T. Mirza, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Shri V.V. Naik, learned counsel for the respondent-Zilla Parishad. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the respondent-Zilla Parishad issued an advertisement inviting applications for filling up the posts of Medical Officers. The petitioner was one of the candidates, who had submitted the application and appeared in the interview before the Selection Committee. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there were 16 vacancies and 16 candidates were selected by the Selection Committee. It is the case of the petitioner that though she was more meritorious and had secured more marks in the process of interview, her claim was given a go-bye by the respondent-Zilla Parishad without justification and, therefore, this petition. The learned counsel for the respondent-Zilla Parishad has made a categorical statement that all 16 candidates secured more marks than the petitioner in the process of interview. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent-Zilla Parishad that the petitioner has secured 12 marks 2 out of 50 marks, whereas the other candidates, who are selected, have secured 16 and above marks out of 50 marks. There is no reason to disbelieve the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent-Zilla Parishad. Hence, no case is made out for indulgence. The petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE Lanjewar