1 2343.11 SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2343 OF 2011 Mr.Satnam Singh Jagdish Singh Gupta ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ...... None for Petitioner. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr.Anand Kumar for Respondent No.4. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATED:- NOVEMBER 16, 2011. P.C. 1. None appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the respondent No.4 submits that respondent No.4 is father of respondent No.6. The marriage between petitioner and respondent No.6 has been dissolved by the Deed of Divorce. Perhaps, for that reason, the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this remedy. 2. Since none appears for the petitioner, this Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. We, however, make it clear that any request for restoration of writ petition will be considered only if the Advocate for the petitioner 2 2343.11 compensates the loss caused to the State Exchequer on account of the presence of the police officer who has come to instruct the learned A.P.P. and has been waiting in Court since morning. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)