1 c.a.6900.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6900 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7016 OF 2010 [Babasaheb Kashinath Pathade Vs. The State of Mah. and others] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr.P.R.Katneshwarkar,Advocate for applicant. Mr.D.V.Tele,AGP for respondent No.1&3. Mr.S.Mathpathi,Advocate holding for Mr.S.B.Talekar,Advocate for Resp.No.2 ... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 9TH AUGUST, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned AGP for respondent No.1 and 3 and learned counsel for respondent No.2. 2. Counsels appearing for respondents/non- applicants have no objection to allow the application seeking amendment. Perused the 2 c.a.6900.11 contents of application. 3. Considering the contentions stated in the application, application deserves to be allowed and same is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause [B]. 4. Petitioner to carryout necessary amendment and place amended Writ Petition on record, after serving copy of it to respondents. Such amendment be carried out within one week from today. If respondents wish to file reply to such amendment, they can do so, within two weeks from the date of amendment in the Writ petition. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- [S.S. SHINDE, J.] MTK