IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19083 of 2009 1. MANISH SINHA @ MANISH KUMAR SINHA 2. Pramod Ray Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 08.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. In the case complainant was appointed as distributor of the INET Telecom Pvt. Ltd., Siwan. He, of course, deposited Rs. 3,60,000/- as security. Petitioners in capacity of Managing Director and Director have returned Rs. 3,40,000/-. Only Rs. 20,000/- was kept with them because of the expenses which they made on acceptance of complainant’s distributorship in construction of Tower on his roof. According to the learned counsel, petitioners’ company was entitled for more money but only Rs. 20,000/- is withheld and they have been made accused apprehending their arrest which can never be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 67 of 2009, Trial No. 2292 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri P.C. Anal, J.M., Ist Class, Siwan subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)