BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT_OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. .5.C-G4 /2003. PETITIONER ^8?k" ^^ ^SPONDENTS ^.^ Nirmal Dewangan, son of Shri Sunder Lal Dewangan, years, resident of Dewan^ Juna Bilaspur (C.G.) ^•' ^^o.?^^ Sunder Lal Dewangan, aged about 27 ?<Q^k ^1^^* years, resident of Dewangan Mohalla, VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through : Secretary, Department of Public Works and Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Collector, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Chief Engineer, (East), Public Works Department, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Executive Engineer, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). 5. Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT, ORDER OR / AND DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIQRARj QR OF ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE NATURE. XI-HC—78 ^"^'^r't^FF Tf§T[ 3Tj^T ^qr^- -X... ^ L^ •3-ST ^IFTETSJ^ ^~WT%, f»T^ra7T< ^_..p:.(7;...^°.;.. 3TI^r^^(^t5^«T) ^^T^^iTW^T 03.9.2003 Shri Vinay Pandey, coiiijisel for the petitioner. Shri Ranblr Smgh, De^uty Advocate General appears for the State/respondents. The grievmice ofthcpet recruitment drive on 22.4.19^9 he was selected to the post ot" Draughtsinan and the DepuJty Collector by his letter dated 14.6.1999 recommended hi; Engineer, P.W.D., Bilaspur dated 24.1.2000 addressed informed that since the office Bilaspur Divisioii Eiiid ollie petitioner may be considered ^pifa^ TTFi^ff ^ f^t Tf^'$T;( ^^RRW^T tioiier is that duriiig the special naaie to the Superintending [Annexure P-2) but respondent 110.5/the Superuitending E^giiieer, Raipur vide his letter (Annex.^-5) |to the CoUector Bilaspur^had lof the Superintenduig Engineer, divi^ioiial offices Iiave beeii dosed snd they ^re going to fljbolish 30% ofthe posts, there is no vacancy available under hfan and therefore, posting ofthe tn oftier departments. It is subiiiitted by leai'n^d counsel for the petitioner that tliereafter the petitioner has |iiade several representations to tlie Collector, Bilaspur, but ^he Collector has not responded any coniniunication, nor he ife deciding the represeiitations. Having heard leamed |counsel for fhe petitioner and further having regai'd to tlie|facts and cu'cumstances of ttie case and niaterial on record, the petitioner is allowed to inak^ Jtr" XI-HC-22 3T?^T^ ' l^ri^^it^ ^\^ ^rfi^T ^-^- -:,-<:. ?^ ^^^ IM -o^ ;;^PTf^PT, ^•dl^i^^ [^<rj|^^< wv^i'wv^ t^^ J^^. ^^ "^ 200^ ' i^^s?"'.' W^T -^H^R -^ftn the a detai]ed representation to BUaspur within a period of 3C^ representation beuig filed, consider and decide the said i|e in accordance with law at mi! period of 30 days from representation. In case any petitioner may avail the reme^y This petition is dispo|< observation aforesaid. titie Accordingly, M.W.P.P| I.A.No.8114/2003^stand C.C< as per rules. dispo^ed '^nt^l4h ^TH^ff '9 ^^ Tf^TST^ ^T •3ti^R-3:H^f be Collector/respondent no.2, clays froni today and on such ;he Collector, Bilaspm' shall epresentation of the petitioner early date preferably witliin a date ot' llling the said other grievance subsists, the under fhe law. sed of with the direction/ o.2446 of. of 2003 and Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [^^feq