IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.203 of 2010 GOLU THAKUR @ JITENDRA THAKUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that co-accused standing on similar footing without help of section 12 of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000, has been allowed bail vide Cr.Misc.No. 2262 of 2009 by a Bench of this Court but petitioner’s prayer for bail is refused which in no case can be justified. I agree with the submission. In view of submissions and under the facts and circumstances, this revision application is allowed and judgment and order dated 16.1.2010 passed by Sri B.B.Pandey, 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in Criminal Appeal No. 127/09 confirming the order dated 15.10.2009 passed in Trial no. 403/2010 arising out of Town P. S. Case No. 492/07 by Juvenile Justice Board, Muzaffarpur is set aside. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 2 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Muzaffarpur in Trial no. 403/10 arising out of Town P. S. Case No. 492/07. It is made clear that one of the bailer shall be petitioner’s father who shall undertake to keep the petitioner under his observation and shall produce him whenever is ordered by the Juvenile Justice Board. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)