IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7392 of 2010 BIRENDRA BAITHA @ BIRENDRA KUMAR RAJAK Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 03 19.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. In view of the informant acknowledging of having taken a stand contrary to the F.I.R., in her deposition during trial, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of F.T.C.- Ist, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Durgawati P.S. Case No. 151 of 2008, S.Tr. No. 161 of 2009/62 of 2009. The photographs and proof of residence of the bailors shall be appended to the bail bond. The trial court is directed to keep in mind its duty to unravel the truth by resort to power under Section 311 Cr.P.C. if necessary and ultimately if, satisfied, that the prosecution failed, because of the prosecution itself not supporting the allegations, it is directed to proceed appropriately against the concerned both under the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Indian Penal Code. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)