skc 1 WP-3944-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3944 OF 2010 Janak Raj Gupta & Ors. ..Petitioners versus The Commissioner, Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. S. S. Kulkarni for Petitioners. Mr. A. A. Garge for Respondent Nos. 1 and 5. Mrs. M. P. Thakur - Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent Nos. 7 and 8. Mr. R. B. Paranjape for Respondent No. 9. Mr. Prashant P. Maggu for Respondent No. 10. Mr. Suresh H. Sharma for Respondent No. 12. CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. 20 September 2011 P.C. : Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The grievance of the petitioners is in respect of use of covered parking for commercial use by the respondents pertaining to building Sai Sangam, Plot No. 85, Sector 15, CBD, Belapur. The petitioner no. 1 has submitted applications / complaints dated 11th January 2010 (Exhibit ‘B’) and 8th February 2010 (Exhibit ‘D’) which are pending for decision before skc 2 WP-3944-10 the appropriate authority. Counsel for the petitioners therefore prayed that appropriate directions be given to the Commissioner to decide the said applications / complaints of the petitioner in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 3. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent no. 1 Commissioner to decide the above referred applications / complaints of the petitioner dated 11th January 2010 and 8th February 2010, if not decided earlier, in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard on its own merits by following principles of natural justice by giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to the parties to the petition, within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this Order. If the respondent no. 1 – Commissioner comes to the conclusion that the commercial activities carried out by the respondents are without permission and inconsistent with the procedure and law, in that event appropriate action in accordance with law shall be taken by the respondent – Corporation against the concerned respondents. (D. D. SINHA, J.) (SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)