IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL MCC MODIFICATION APPLICATION NO. 57 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1660 OF 2002 (SB) Nahar Singh ………………….Petitioner. Versus U.P. State Road Transportation & Ors. ………Respondents. Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate for the review applicant. None appears for respondents. 18th March, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. An application has been moved by the petitioner for modification of the order dated 31.7.2008 stating therein that since petitioner’s leg was fractured, he could not make representation before the authority within time given in the aforesaid order and he may be given one month’s more time for making such a representation. Reasons assigned in the modification application supported by an affidavit for modification of the order dated 31st July, 2008 appear to be genuine and therefore, it is directed that in paragraph -3 of the order dated 31st July, 2008, the period of ‘one month’ shall be read as ‘nine months’. With the aforesaid direction, modification application is disposed of. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 18.3.2009 Rathour