HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2394 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.532 of 2005 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Gudivada, against the respondent for recovery of certain amount. The suit was decreed on 09/02/2007. Shortly thereafter, the petitioner filed E.P.No.32 of 2007. An order of attachment of EP Schedule properties was passed. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Executing Court is not taking up the matter, may be, on account of pressure of pendency, and that he is not able to recover any amount from the respondent. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The limited grievance of the petitioner is about the delay in disposal of the EP. More than three years have elapsed ever since the petitioner filed the EP. The suit was disposed of within two years from the date of presentation. The EP should not take more than that time. The undue delay in disposal of the EP would result in a situation of denying the very benefit of decree. It may be true, that the Court is under pressure of pendency. All the same, execution petitions are to be given priority. The Civil Revision Petition is disposed of directing the Executing Court to dispose of the EP as early as possible and not later than three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J 14th June, 2010 NOTE: Furnish C.C. by one week. B/o. SKM