IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CR No.6362 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 30.9.2010 Ashok Kumar .......... Petitioner Versus Wakf Tribunal Kapurthala District Kapurthala & another ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present : Mr. R.S. Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioner. **** VINOD K. SHARMA, J. (ORAL) The learned counsel for the petitioner contends, that the suit filed by the plaintiff / petitioner before the learned Wakf Tribunal, Kapurthala was not competent. Firstly, for the reason, that it was suit for injunction in individual capacity, in which the Wakf Board was not party. Secondly, in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ramesh Gobindram (dead) Through LRs. Vs. Sugra Humayun Mirza Wakf 2010(2) RCR 266, the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter in dispute. In view of this, the learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw this revision petition with liberty to file a fresh suit in the Court of competent jurisdiction. Dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted. 30.09.2010 (VINOD K. SHARMA) 'sp' JUDGE