IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12521 of 2009 1. FUL JAMHA @ FUL JAHAN 2. Nazama Khatoon Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.6.2009 Learned Counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make correction in the name of the father of petitioner no.2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. This petition for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners, who are accused for offences punishable under Sections 498A, 324 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 is the sister-in-law and petitioner no.2 is the mother-in-law of the informant, whereas the main accused person, namely, Md. Anamul, who is the husband of the informant, has already been enlarged on bail on the orders of the learned court below. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons and the petitioners are being unnecessarily harassed. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. In case of surrender/arrest within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in the court below, petitioners namely, Ful Jamha @ Ful Jahan and Nazama Khatoon shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) each with two 2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, District Madhubani in connection with Andhratharhi P.S.case No.60 of 2006 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Narendra/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )