IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CRMMO No.170 of 2010 Date of decision : November 10, 2010 Meena Rani …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and another …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Surjit Singh, J (Oral) Heard and gone through the record. 2. Present petition has been filed for quashing the FIR, on the plea that the petitioner, who has been booked alongwith her brother, who is the husband of the complainant, for offences, under Sections 323, 498-A and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, is in no way involved in the commission of the alleged crime. Alongwith the petition, copy of the FIR has also been annexed. 3. From a bare reading of the FIR, it is clear that on a particular day, i.e. on 13th June, 2010, the present petitioner, accompanied by her brother, went to the place where the complainant alongwith her husband and parents- Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …2… in-law resided and they all, including the present petitioner, gave her beatings and intimidated her. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. November 10, 2010(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J