IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.13015-M of 2010 Date of Decision:3.12.2010 Preetinder Singh and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. A.K. Walia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Paul, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. Munish Kapila, Advocate for respondent No.6. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to register an FIR under Sections 465,467,468,471,120-B IPC and under Sections 11 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against respondents No.4 to 6 for forging an exchange deed of the land of petitioner No.1. Reply by way of affidavit of Hardavinder Singh Sandhu PPS Deputy Superintendent of Police (Rural) Patiala, on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. As per the said reply, FIR No.463 dated 13.9.2010 under Sections 420/120-B IPC Police Station Sadar Patiala was registered and is being investigated by Superintendent of Police (Detective) Patiala and offences under Sections 465/467/468/471 IPC have been added. In view of the said reply, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present petition may be dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 3.12.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE