HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19450 OF 2010 Date: 13.08.2010 Between: Shaik Iqbal Hussain. … Petitioner And The Joint Sub-Registrar-I R.O.(OB), Kurnool & others. … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19450 of 2010 ORDER: In the writ petition, the petitioner seeks directions to the respondents to pass orders on his representation, dated 01.07.2010, with regard to registration of the Gift Settlement Deed, dated 26.06.2010. It is the case of the petitioner that his father by name Shaik Khadar Hussain and his brother Shaik Afsar Hussain are the absolute owners and possessors of the land admeasuring Ac.11.41 cents, covered by Sy.No.166/3, situated at Munagalapadu village of Kurnool Mandal and District. It is stated that the original owners wanted to settle the aforesaid property in favour of the petitioner by executing the gift settlement deed, but the respondents are not accepting the said document for the purpose of registration, on the ground that the land in question belongs to the Wakf. It is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioner that when the respondents have raised such an objection, the petitioner has filed a representation before the 1st respondent-Joint Sub-Registrar, but so far, no orders are passed on his representation. On instructions, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents, that the petitioner has not at all presented any document for the purpose of registration. It is further stated that if any document is presented by the petitioner or his father, the same will be considered, provided said document is in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Stamp Act and the Registration Act, and that if any objections are there for registration of the document, the same will be communicated to the petitioner as contemplated under Section 71 of the Registration Act. In this case, although it is the case of the petitioner that he has presented the document for registration, a submission is made by the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents, that no such document is presented before them, so as to consider it for the purpose of registration. No material is also placed on record by the petitioner in proof of producing the document before the registering authority for registration. Merely because a representation is filed before the respondents, there is no need to pass orders on such representation filed by the petitioner, in the absence of submitting any document for the purpose of registration. In that view of the matter, I do not find any merit in this writ petition, for grant of directions to consider the petitioner’s representation, dated 01.07.2010. However, I make it clear that if any document is presented by the petitioner or any other persons, executing gift settlement deed in favour of the petitioner, the same shall be considered in accordance with law. It is also made clear that if there are any objections for registration of such document, the reasons for such refusal shall be recorded and communicated to the petitioner. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 13th August 2010 ajr