/ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTlSGARl-i AT BILASPUR i) B hON BLE Mr JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR $INHA & HON BLE Mr JUST!CE R N CHANDRAVAR WPJC) N62473i2011 Ws Laxml Construction Co Through :ts Partner Shn Laxml Narayan Agarwai 8/0 Sn TC Agrawa! Jawahar Market, Ambikapur District Sa’rguja (0.6.) i ‘ gETrriONEg RESPONDENTS Versus The State of Chhattisgarh thraugh Secretary, The Principai Ministry of Rural Deveiopment, Govt. of Chhattisgarhh DKS Bhavan, Raip’ur (C.G.) 2 The Chief Executive Officer, Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency, Vikas Bhavan, Ratpur (C.G.) 3 The Chief Engineer, _ Chhattisgarh Rurai Road Development Agency, Vikas Bhavan, Raipur (C.G,) .The Executive Engineer- cum-Member Secretary Project impiementation Unit No.2, PMGSY Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) 5 The Executive Engineer— cum—Member Secretary Project implementation Unit No.11,PiVlGSY Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 6 The Executive Engineer- cum-Member Secretary Project Implementation Unit No.1 2, PMGSY Ramanuiganj, District Surguja (C.G.) 7 The Executiv cum-Member Project Engineer— Secretary implementation, e . W.P.gCi N0.247312011 § . PMGSY Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.) [\iRiT PETITION UNDER ARTICE 226 OF THE CQNSTlTUTlON OF !ND!A ‘ Aggearance : Mr. Rahul Jha, Counsel for the petitioner. th Mr. A.S. Kachhwaha, Dy. Advocate General for e State oRAL ORDER (09.05.2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Sunil Kumar sinha. J. " ' Heard. Mr. Rahul Jha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that after a decision in terms of Clause 24 of the Agreement, the petitioner has aiready tiled a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Acts 1996 and‘the matter is pending for consideration. He does not disputethat there is an arbitration clause in the subject agreement. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the Arbitration and Conciliation, Act, 1996 ' would be applicable in the present matter. ln View of all this, he seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avaii appropriate remedy available to the petitioner under thelaw. Permission granted. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the l petitionwi‘ W yeg Sd/- , sw- gUmL KUMAR SINHA R‘N- Chandrakar ‘Judge Judge