IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.477 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:24.01.2011. Ram Sahai ...Petitioner Versus Vinod Jain ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Aman Khullar, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the orders passed by the Courts below. Alongwith this revision, learned counsel for the petitioner has also filed an application under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in order to place on record certain rent receipts on the ground that earlier he had misplaced the same. On a pointed question put to learned counsel for the petitioner whether a plea was taken in the written statement that rent has already been paid to the landlord of which period the rent receipts are being sought to be placed on record by way of additional evidence, he had categorically stated that this plea was not taken in the written statement. Once there is no pleading, the question of leading additional evidence does not arise. Apart from the above, I also do not find any merit in this revision petition and as such, the same is hereby dismissed in limine. No costs. January 24, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE