[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2516 OF 2008 Sunil Gangaram Dhumal ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Shailesh Kantharia Advocate for Applicant Mr.K.V.Saste APP for the State Ms.Rashmi Gagwani advocate for original complainant ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : AUGUST 20, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 20, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 20, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in CR No.I-197 of 2007 of Kalyan Taluka Police Station. The said case is mainly under Section 302 of IPC. 3. There was property dispute between the original accused nos.1 and 2 and deceased Bhagwan. The material on record shows that the applicant was known to original accused no.1 and 2 and he was seen in their company and was having discussion [-2-] with them prior to the incident. There is recovery of blood stained sword and blood stained clothes at the instance of the applicant. The C.A. report shows that the blood stains found on the weapons and the clothes recovered at the instance of the applicant, is of the same blood group as that of the deceased. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant at this stage, hence, application is rejected. 4. Liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for bail in case the trial does not start by 30.11.2008. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]