PIL 93/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.MADAN B.LOKUR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY The grievance of the petitioners is that a pucca path from Patak ata Tiniali to Dewakandi Senior Madrassa via Halhali has been sanctioned under M akhya Mantri Paki Path Nirman Achani (MMPNA). The allegation is that the road ha s been diverted without any appropriate sanction. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners relies on an affidavit state d to have been filed by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhubri on 21.4.2010. The affida vit is not on record. Registry should place the same on record. It is stated in the affidavit that a joint inspection was carried out which shows that the road alignment has been deviated from towards Tumni bypassing the sanctioned alignmen t upto Dewakandi Senior Madrassa via Halhali. 3. The Executive Engineer, PWD, Rural Road Division has filed an af fidavit dated 10.2.2010 in which it is stated that the construction has been mad e as per the sanctioned plan and estimate and that the length of Patakata Tinial i to Holhali is 1 K.M. and from Dewakandi Senior Madrassa is about ‰ K.M. Thus, the total length of Patakata Tiniali to Dewakandi Senior Madrassa comes to 1 ‰ K M. But as per the plan and estimate the length of the sanctioned road is 3 K.M. which has gone beyond the Dewakandi Senior Madrassa upto Tumni and the work has been going on as per the sanctioned plan and estimate. 4. Since the affidavits filed in this PIL appear to be in some conf lict with each other and the petitioners have already made a representation whic h is dated 22.11.2009 seeking appropriate steps to complete the road from Pataka ta Tiniali to Dewakandi Senior Madrassa via Halholi, we have no doubt that respo ndents would consider the representation of the petitioners and construct the ro ad, if necessary, as prayed for. 5. In the circumstances, no further order is required to be passed in this PIL. Accordingly, it is disposed of.