k IN THE HON?BLE HIGH^COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT ^t^") ^Q^C^ BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) N0. 2.3^ OF 2011 PETITIONER ^ Ay/ >^f^ Mithilesh Kumar Nirmalkar S/o Shri Ghisal Prasad Nirmalkar , aged about-42 years, R/o village- Tenganmada, Janpad Panchayat-Kota, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). x VERSUS RESpSNDENT CONTEMNOR ^- Shri Vivek Dand S/o not known to the petitioner, ~ Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.). CONTEMPT PETITIONUNDER ARTICLE 215 OF COHSTSTUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 FOR INITIATING CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAZNST THE RESPONDENT/ CONTEMNER FOR WILFUL DISOBEDIENCE QF THE QRDER DATED 01.09.10 PASSED BY TMS HON»BLE COURT IN W.P. N0.1398/2000. \- ^!SM^Siii^l^^i^ &^^^S^t ^T^r^ff^N)" ^^ 3:H^T st?^i<^ \-'' baaiii ^ Deepti HIHCTt W»H|Cb 'T^r ^jqi<nq, ^Til'H^Ko, [®i<ni^^< ..<^.:.6^..«..i)...y^'l^i ^n^r ^=RT (4c(?^<^T) ^<TT^T Trf^T ^^ SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra IVIohan chi^<n<i1i tTPTOf ^ fe^ Tf^^* '^'3TRHTOT^T Shrivastava. J. 05-09-2011 Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha, cour|sel for the petitioner. Heard on admission. This petition has been fiied b^ the petitioner aiieging disobedience of order dated 1/09/10 passed in W.P. No.1398/2000. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the earlier round of iitigation, the petitioner was permitt^ci to withdraw the petition with iiberty to file revision and this Court obsen/ed thaijthe revision is expected to be decided by the State Government in accordance wifi law as expeditiously as possibie. However, tili date, the revision has not been d^cided. Learned counsei submits that by not deciding the revision expeditiousiy, c<(>ntempt has been committed. 'What 1 find is that whiie ailowing the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty, a hope was expressedby fiis Court that the revision may be decided expeditiousiy as possibie. Howeveij, no direction has been given to decide the same within an outer limit. in that view of the matter, 1 arrj The petitioner wouid be at iiberty to] not inclined to initiate contempt proceedings. approach the writ Court to take appropriate directions. However, it is unfortunat^ that the authorities of the State Government are not deciding the matter expeditioi The petition is finaily disposed tisly. loff. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge