IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.8027 OF 2009 Between: P. Amarender Reddy, P. Narsimha Reddy ……Petitioner – Complainant AND The State of A.P., Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad & 2 others .....Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.8027 OF 2009 ORDER: This Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the complainant P. Amarender Reddy seeking to quash the order dated 11-09-2009 in Criminal M.P. No.2708 of 2009 in C.C. No.473 of 2008 passed by the learned XIX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, City Criminal Courts, Hyderabad 2. Heard both sides. 3. A perusal of the impugned order shows that from the initial stage, accused Nos.1 and 2 – respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein have been contending that the transaction in dispute does not pertain to any loan, but it was with regard to development of some die for some commercial purpose and to prove the same, they want the disputed documents to be sent to the expert for comparison of the handwritings of the complainant, which plea was allowed by the learned Magistrate under the impugned order. 4. As found by the learned Magistrate, there is nothing irregular in sending the above documents to the expert for comparison of the handwritings of the complainant, particularly when the case of the accused, consistently, is that loan transaction documents and the documents which are sought to be send to the expert would reveal their defence with regard to actual transaction. 5. In the circumstances, I see no merit in this petition, as such, the petition is liable to be dismissed. 6. Therefore, the Criminal Petition is dismissed at the admission stage itself. ____________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J December 17, 2009. PV