THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4084 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed M.V.O.P.No.1056 of 2005 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-Principal District Judge, Kurnool against the respondents. The M.V.O.P. was allowed on 07.08.2008 by awarding a sum of Rs.82,500/- as compensation with interest at the rate of 9% per annum. The Tribunal directed that the petitioner shall be entitled to withdraw a sum of Rs.40,000/- and the balance shall be kept in fixed deposit in a Nationalised Bank for a period of one year. The respondents did not prefer any appeal and the order passed in the M.V.O.P. became final. The petitioner was permitted to withdraw a sum of Rs.40,000/- vide order, dated 01.05.2009, passed in I.A.No.709 of 2009. The balance of Rs.68,592/- was kept in a fixed deposit. The petitioner filed I.A.No.1105 of 2010 with a prayer to permit her to withdraw the amount in deposit. The Tribunal passed an order, dated 16.07.2010, permitting the petitioner to withdraw a sum of Rs.25,000/-. The petitioner feels aggrieved by the denial of permission to withdraw the balance of the amount. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. There are no contesting respondents in this writ petition, since the respondents did not raise any objection for the I.A. filed by the petitioner before the Tribunal. A perusal of the note put up by the Office, which is part of the docket proceedings, discloses that a sum of Rs.68,592/- is kept in a fixed deposit for a period of one year as directed by the Tribunal, no appeal is pending, no order of stay was received and minors interests are not involved. It is further observed that a notice was given to respondent No.2. The Tribunal obviously wanted to protect the interest of the petitioner by permitting her to withdraw a sum of Rs.25,000/- and keeping rest of the amount in deposit. However, once the time stipulated by the Tribunal for the fixed deposit had expired, the petitioner cannot be denied the benefit of withdrawing that amount. Therefore, the civil revision petition is allowed and the order under revision is modified to the effect that I.A.No.1105 of 2010 shall stand allowed permitting the petitioner to withdraw the entire amount that is in deposit together with accrued interest. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:24.11.2010. Note: Issue cc in three days. (B/o) kdl