HIGH CWJRT 5F CHHATTI$GARH: BILASPUR wgt Petition (§mwo. 32w cf 2:308 Petitioner Miss Kaiyani Mukherjee, D/o. Late 8hri Bhawani Shanker Mukherjee, aged abgut 57 yearS, presentiy posted as UDT) Nagar Pailk Nigam, Higher Secondary Schook, Raigam, District Raigarh (CG), R/o. Civii Line, Raigarh (CG). Versus Bespondents 1) State of Chhamsgarh through the Secondary Education Department, DKS Bhavan, Raipur If‘f‘\ \uw;. 2) Municipat Corporation, Raigarh, thfough its Commi$si0ner, Di$tt Raigarh (CG). / 3) The Principai, iagar Palik Nigam, Higher Secgndan/ $chool, Raigarh, Di$trmt Ragiar‘n (CG) (Wm Petition under Amcie 226 of the Constitution of indie) ’ SB: Hon’bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. )k \ l’resent; Shri PR. Patankar, oounsei forthe petitioner. Shri Arun Sac, Govt. Advocate for the Stare. ORkL ORaER (Passed an. 30‘“ day or June, 2098i ‘With consent of iearned’counsei appearing for both the parties, the matter is heard finativ. 2) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner as weii as teamed oounsei aopearing for the respondents/State joiniiy submit that the facts and question of law, invoived in the present writ petttion, are the same asto that ot in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipat Corporation, Durg and another {2m (it) MPJR nCG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 3—4-2006 and the order dated ?-2-2067 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No‘ 697 of 2007 (RNN. Satyanarayan and others Vs. Sate of Chhattisgarh and others). _Z’ 3) Accerdingw, the writ petition is aHowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bhardadwaj (gupra) and A.N.V. Safyanarayan {supra), sub}ect to verification 'of the fact asto whether the petiticner has‘acqmred BEd/DEdiBTJJMEd. Examination Certmcate on her own expenses, as per the circulars dated 13-9-1 974, 24-12-1998, and 1—3—1999 and further whether she has . been paid two advance increments or not. No Order as to casts- . M 1‘ ’ Sd/- ‘ . ‘Satish K. Agmhotn Judge E Raju