IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 14486 of 2008 Between: Kurati Eswara RAo S/o.Vadapally R/o.Pillenkasivar Kotha Lanka village Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of AP., rep.by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Amalapuram, East Godavari District 2 The Station House officer, I.Polavaram P.S., East Godavari District 3 The District Collector, East Godavari District at Kakinada .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in directing the petitioner not to enter into his own agricultural land admeasuring Ac.2.20 guntas situated in Survey No.516 Pasuvulanka village, I.Polavaram Mandal, East Godavari District and not allowing the petitoner to remove the cut-trees as arbitrary, and illegal. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.SATYAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 14486 of 2008 O R D E R: This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a declaration that the alleged action of the second respondent-the Station House Oﬃcer, I. Polavaram P.S. in not allowing the petitioner to enter into the land in question and also in not allowing the petitioner to remove the cut trees is arbitrary and illegal. The petitioner’s father was assigned an extent of Ac.2.20 guntas of land situated in Sy.No.516 of Pasuvulanka village, I. Polavaram Mandal, East Godavari District in the year 1976. It is stated that after his death in the year 1991, the petitioner and his brothers are continuing in possession and enjoyment of the said land. The second respondent ﬁled a counter aﬃdavit denying the allegations made by the petitioner and stating that as per the enquiry report dated 22-06-2008 submitted by the Sub-divisional Police Oﬃcer, Amalapuram, in the revenue records the Ac.2.20 cents of land in R.S.No.516 was found to be in possession of one Mr.Beera Venkata Rao. However, it is reiterated in the counter aﬃdavit that the allegation of the petitioner that the second respondent is interfering in civil disputes is false and that it is also not correct to say that the second respondent is not allowing the petitioner to remove the logs from the land in question. Having regard to the counter aﬃdavit ﬁled by the second respondent denying the allegation made by the petitioner, no further enquiry is necessary and accordingly, recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 04-09-2008 KLP