IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6676 of 2010 BIDYA NAND RAI, son of Late Sheopujan Rai, resident of Village Bachari, P.S. Pira, District Bhojpur. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Director, Panchayat Raj, Bihar, Patna, New Secretariat, Patna. 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner-Cum-Chief Executive Officer,Zila Parishad, Rohtas at Sasaram, P.S. Sasaram, District Rohtas. ----------- 2. 20.4.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent no.3. The grievance of the petitioner is that his retiral dues have not been settled correctly. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Zila Parishad submits that the grievances of the petitioner as highlighted in this writ application shall be considered as per law without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Deputy Development Commissioner- cum-Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Rohtas at Sasaram (respondent no.3). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six 2 months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation may be settled without further delay and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)