SlK:^ ^^h l P. R. No..-.....^.;?.^/5<—••""•"' j PreseRtedbySh".^.,/.^ftAAiy^5^ datad...A§..'^."^t%--"—"""""""" IN THE HIGHCOURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUB WmTPETITION(S) N0. 6 "74-3 OF 2006 PETITIONER: Govlnd Smgh ThaKur, S/o- Shri Grahan. Singh. Thakur, Aged ABout^l'7 Yearg, Qccugation- Revenue Inspgctpr, Ttiesil "Office- Kuriid, Bistt.-gliamatri (€,@.j j( VERSUS RESEQNDENT^S): 1. State of ChMatdsgatj Through it's Secretary Departnient of Reveiiue, D.K.S. BKftwan Raipui \Sj^'.,ov ^N'T""'' '"""°" —""••"-"~u— yw^ (C'G-) ^^.ovift ^jy 2. CoUecfor, Raigarh, Distt. - ^^-"' , / Kaigarh (C.G.) c^" fr-- WRIt PBTITION UNDBR -S^RTJCLE 226/:\ ' OF TMB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE _QF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT W THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS / CBRTIORARI BTC. OR DIRBCTION / ORDER IN THE LIKB NATUSE. s XI-HC-78 *1MMI ShNlcb s^^traRW, diTfl'y'id, [«iciitfy -'. i. .^^.y. w^. .T. A. . ^q- ^oo 311^1 Wfh (licll3'!"«eT) STI^r^Tf^H?; (!s:'3n^Tgmw \ ^' SRnw HfN'3n^r 11.12.2006: respon(|lent tn pen^lty Shri Vitiay Pandey counsel for ttl< Heard. Counsel for the petitioner subr(uts Revenue bspector under the Annexure P-1 dated 16.2.2004 passed ^m Departaental Enquiry whereby Ifae reduced to the pay scale of Revenue Inh would be payable to him on Ae basis that the petitioner preferred an appeal i^nder (Classffication. Control & Appeal) Rule| 5.4.2004 vide Amixure P-2 but he sam< than 2 years and 6 monfhs have elapsed. | Leamed counsel for tfae disposed of with a direction to fhe app^Uate preferred by the petitioner as expeditiouj offourmonths, wtuch is not opposed by|the petitl((ner In view of above the petition appellate authority to dispose of the expeditiously as possible preferably witl(in ofreceipt ofcopy ofthis order. «bi'iitci'ifi-<t<i><ciTffrs'<;) <R]^|< ^wf^iTsn^T e petitioner. that the petitioner was working as No.l. The respondent No.2 vide order of punishment after conducting i^ty was imposed and his pay scale was ^pector and the fature annual increments 4f reduced pay scale. He further submits Rule 23 ofthe C.G. Civil Services |1966 before the State ofChhattisgarh on ^ has yet not been decided thou^i more submits that Ihis petition may be authority to dispose of the appeal ly as possible preferably within a period ic leamed counsel for the respondents. |is disposed of with a direction to the appeal preferred by tfae petitioner as a period offour months fi-om the date Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.