IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE SECOND APPEAL NO. 247 OF 1992 SECOND APPEAL NO. 247 OF 1992 SECOND APPEAL NO. 247 OF 1992 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders and Registrar’s orders : Court’s or Judge’s orders ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. DATED: 15TH SEPT., 2005 DATED: 15TH SEPT., 2005 DATED: 15TH SEPT., 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for both parties. The learned counsel for the appellants submits that there is transaction between the parties regarding disputed property and present respondents have sold the property to the appellants by registered sale deed of the year 1998 pending the appeal. Copy of the sale deed is circulated on record and marked "X" for identification. In view of this position, nothing remains in the appeal. In fact the concluding part of sale deed refers to the present appeal and, therefore, nothing remains regarding the dispute involved in this appeal. In view of this position, the appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. .....