-#- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1036 OF 2006 Chandramohan H. Khosla ....Petitioner Vs. Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank & Anr................Respondents Mr. S. Mohammed i/b.Paras Kuhad & Associates for the Petitioners CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 20th April,2006 DATE : 20th April,2006 DATE : 20th April,2006 P.C.: . The challenge is to the order of the Appellate Tribunal dismissing the application for condonation of delay in preferring an appeal. From the order it is clear that the respondent No.2 co-borrower was the father of the petitioner who had preferred an appeal within limitation. That appeal had been disposed of on merits. It is in these circumstances the Tribunal found that no sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay of 315 days in preferring the Appeal. We do not find that the order suffers from any error apparent. It is based on the facts on record and no interference is called for. Petition rejected. (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J)