‘ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH QQ‘WV WRIT PEmION No. 66f OF 2003 Satyonorayom Mohapotro, aged obouT 46 years, S/o Hari Bcmdhu Mohopatrc, working as Assistom‘ Teacher/Lab Assisfam, Governmem Higher Secondary School, Soriyo, dis’rrio’r Roigorh (Chho’r’risgorh) PETITIONER Versus ~ RESPONDENTS /4J1‘e of ChhoTTisgorh through The Secretory, Depor’rmeh’r of School Educo’rion, D.K.S. Bhowoh, Montroioyo, Roipur (ChhoHisgorh) 2. Disrricr Educotioh Officer, Roigorh (Chhoiiisgorh) ' 3. Disfricf Educofion Officer, Roipur (Chho’riisgorh) 4. J. R. Mohsorwo, Assisfoni Teocher, Primary School, Tokri, Block Abhonpur, Disfricf Roipur (Chhof’risgorh) ..// RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE causmmION or INbIA i W XI—HC—~—7 8 3%a:agmaq,§R%gma waR¥g r A p.“u ,4 17 [ 4 {2003 Petitioner bv Shri Prashar State 13V Dr. N.K. Shukla, 1 Ehri RS. Koshy, Govt. Advocate. Heard. by the petitioner chailenging Thie petition has been Eed inter dietriet trallsfer, which affects the promotienal proepect )1” the petitioner. Learned counsel for the Ste te submits that on the notice )eing issued by this Court, State Government is considering r 1 he modification 0f the order imt State maV do it. The inten‘m order passed e my of the authorities of the :bnsideration of the modiflcatio (also in the way of the petitiont representation or avail the alter} With the aforesaid observations, (disposed of. If the grievénce of ti l :nay tile a petition afresh. Certified cepy as pet rules‘ n; Mishra , Advcca te . kddl. Advocate General, with )ugned. : arlier would not come in the State to pass an order for L1 of the orderimpugned, so éi‘ to challenge or make the latiye remedy. this petition 1e petitioner still subsists, he \ Sdl- Fakhruddin 'Judge / v ’ w.p. . Nc‘661/03 WZOQ wwww amwwm Wm<Ww> mwmir WWW§WW en‘wm