CW 10679/10 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.10679/2010 Sushila Chaudhary Versus State & Ors Date of Order ::: 09/08/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Tanveer Ahmed, for petitioner. Counsel submits that petitioner has participated in process of selection held by respondent for the post of GNM against vacancy reserved for OBC (female) and secured 73.65% marks as against last cut off marks (63.269%) of OBC category as is evident from select list dt.12/07/2010 (Ann.5). Counsel submits that despite legal notice being served, still no heed has been paid and she has been verbally informed that her form has not been forwarded from district Sikar as such has not been considered by respondents with regard to inclusion of her name in final select list. Counsel further submits that petitioner was called for interview vide letter dt.06/02/2008 of Chief Medical & Health Officer, Sikar and if it has not been forwarded or sent by office from Sikar to head office Jaipur, she atleast cannot be said to be at fault and be penalised for their inaction. Without going into merits of the case, this Court considers it appropriate to direct CW 10679/10 //2// the petitioner to make a represention raising her grievance to the competent authority and if made, her representation may independently be examined by the authority keeping in view the fact that merely for the reason of her form being not sent from Office of Sikar to the head quarter, she cannot be deprived of her right of consideration especially when she secured marks more than last cut-ff marks of OBC category, as alleged which can be examined from record; however, for any other impediment, the authority may pass speaking order as well and communicate to the petitioner within one month and if feels aggrieved, she will be free to avail of the remedy under law. With the observations (supra), the writ petition stands disposed of. (Ajay Rastogi), J. Om Prakash/ K.Khatri/p.2/ 10679CW2010Aug9Ds.doc