IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10106 of 2009 Between: Ganesh Raghunathrao Munke S/o.Raghunathrao Munke R/o.162, Donganv Village Biloli Taluka Nanded District (MS) ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad 2 The Station House officer, Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar Police Station, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: In this Writ Petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.2 is unduly interfering with his jewellery business. The facts pleaded by the petitioner show that he is a native of Kondalvadi Village, Nanded District, Maharashtra State, and has been carrying on his jewellery business there. He is aggrieved by respondent No.2’s unlawful interference in his business. Though respondent No.2 has filed a counter-affidavit denying any such interference, in my considered view, the Writ Petition, on the petitioner’s own pleadings, cannot be maintained in this Court as the cause of action had arisen within the territorial jurisdiction of Bombay High Court. The mere fact that respondent No.2 is an employee of the State of Andhra Pradesh, does not enable the petitioner to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court. If the petitioner has a legitimate grievance against respondent No.2, he shall approach the Bombay High Court for appropriate relief. Subject to the above observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.13060 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. .______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 29th June, 2009 lur