IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17266 of 2008 SUNIL YADAV & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 17/09/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. The petitioners are accused of a case which has been registered under section 302 and some other sections of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act in which there is allegation that these three petitioners and two others entered into the room and they were having carbines in their hands and on account of firing the informant’s brother Suresh Yadav was killed. It has been submitted that the deceased himself was a notorious criminal being accused in several heinous cases. Enmity was with Anil Yadav on account of election of Mukhiya. The petitioners are not directly related with Anil Yadav who might be responsible for the occurrence. Prayer for bail was opposed by the learned APP who has been assisted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. Case diary has been received and according to the case diary, the petitioners have criminal antecedents. They are described as the persons who have caused murder. Post mortem report corroborates that the deceased has more than one ante mortem injuries. Considering the allegations, I am not inclined to enlarge the - 2 - petitioners on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioners is rejected. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)