IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9942 of 2011 NITYANAND THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH VIG ----------- 2. 12.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner, Vigilance and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 28.01.2011 in a case registered under Sections 162, 420, 467,468,471 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. It is alleged that the accused persons used to collect money for providing the money to the audit team which visited the area for auditing the accounts of various school. From possession of petitioner Rs. 10,000/- and one chit of paper were recovered. The chit reflected the name of schools and certain amount with the list of the persons which suggests that it was the petitioner who was collecting the money. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the money which was recovered was his personal amount. It 2 appears that the petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2011. It is submitted that investigation is completed with regard to I.P.C. matter but charge sheet has not been submitted under the Prevention of Corruption Act. It is also submitted that members of audit team have been granted regular bail by this Court. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Vigilance-II, Patna in connection with Special Case No. 06 of 2011 arising out of Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 13 of 2011. It is made clear that the learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner defaults for three consecutive dates during trial. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)