Crl.M.No.M-19830 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No.M-19830 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 5.8.2009 Islam ....Petitioner. Vs. State of Haryana ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present : Mr.Satish Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Khatkar, AAG Haryana for the State. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.(Oral) Counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that as per the FIR recorded by injured/complainant, there is an injury attributed to him on her right hand with Lathi. Counsel for the State has argued that in the supplementary statement, the complainant had submitted that the said injury was not caused with Lathi but with palasi (sharp-edged weapon). He also submits that injury No.1 is an incised wound as per the MLR of the complainant. In this regard, counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the opinion given by the doctor on 19.11.2008 though injury No.1 is declared grievous but possibility of that injury caused by friendly hand is not ruled out. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation. This fact is admitted by counsel for the State, on instructions received from HC Kallu Khan. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, order Crl.M.No.M-19830 of 2009 -2- dated 24.7.2009 is hereby made absolute. He shall keep on joining the investigation as and when called for. He shall also abide by the provisions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 5.8.2009 JUDGE Meenu