IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24859 of 2009 BRIJA LAHERI @ BIRJU LAHERI @ BIRJU SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17/08/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under section 302 and some other sections of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. According to the FIR, allegation against the petitioner is similar to the allegation as against Bhulla Lahiri whose prayer for bail has been rejected by this court vide order dated 31.3.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10936 of 2009. Submission is that the certain facts were not brought on the record at the time of argument of the case of Bhulla Lahiri. The deceased himself was a criminal and there were possibility that he might be killed elsewhere and the present case has been lodged thereafter. Injured has not disclosed the name of the petitioner. Corresponding injury attributed to the petitioner has been found in the post mortem examination of the deceased and the prayer for bail of co-accused having 2 similar allegation has already been rejected by this court. Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)