1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10042/2008 Afsana Bano v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 17 th December, 2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Ramesh Purohit, for the petitioner. Mr. Shyam Toshniwal, for the respondents. .... Issue notice to the respondents as to why this petition for writ be not admitted. Shri Shyam Toshniwal accepts notice on behalf of all the respondents. As such the service is sufficient. Looking to the fact that the controversy involved in this petition for writ is no more res integra in view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Smt. Vishnu Kunwar v. State of Rajasthan & Ors., SBCivil Writ Petition No.8796/2008, decided on 21.11.2008, this petition for writ is heard finally at this stage. The issue regarding determination of teaching experience for the period of leave beyond control of the aspirant for appointment to the post of Prabodhak has already been decided by this Court in the case of Vishnu Kunwar(supra). The same issued is involved in this petition for writ. 2 Hence, this petition for writ is allowed in light of the judgment referred above. The respondents are directed to consider candidature of the petitioner for the purpose of appointment as Prabodhak in terms of the directions given by this Court in the case of Vishnu Kunwar (supra) and if the petitioner is found otherwise eligible to hold the post of Prabodhak, appointment be accorded to her in accordance with law. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. kkm/ps.