^fr HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR L- APPLICANT RESPONDENTS 1. 2 3 4. 5. 6. M.C.C. N0.716/2011 Seema Gupta, W/o. Aadesh Kumar Gupta, aged about 40 years, R/o Opposite Krishi Upaj Mandi, Jabalpur (M.P.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh through Collector. Korea, Baikunthpur District, Korba (C.G.). Tahsildar, Baikunthpur, Distt. Korea Sub Divisional Ofyicer (Revenue), Baikunthpur, Distt. Korea (C.G.). Moolchandra Gupta, aged about 50 years, S/o Mohanlal Gupta, Arun Gupta, aged about 46 years, S/o. Mohanlal Gupta, Kiran Gupta, aged about 44 years, S/o. Mohanlal Gupta, Nos. 4 to 6 R/o. Baikunthpur, Tahsil Baikunthpur, Distt. Korea (C.G.). AN APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION Appearance: Mr. Vivek Verma, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents 1 to 3. SUNILKUMARSINHA.J. Heard. ORALORDER (19.10.2011) Applicant- Seema Gupta is seeking restoration of Review Petition (PR) No. 1246/2011, which was dismissed for want of ^. M.C.C. N0. 716/2011 prosecution on 26.09.2011 as no one appeared on behalf of the applicant when the matterwas taken up for hearing. On due consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and the grounds taken in the restoratiQn application, 1 am satisfied that the absence of learned counsel for the applicant on 26.09.2011. when Review Petition (PR) No. 1246/2011 was taken up for hearing was based on bonafide grounds. Accordingly, M.C.C. No. 716/2011 is allowed and Review Petition (PR) No. 1246/2011 is restored to its original number. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Rahul