HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26943, 27745 and 27743 of 2010 COMMON ORDER: The grievance of the petitioners in these writ petitioners is that the respondent has not considered their price bids in relation to the tender notice, dated 29.09.2010, for different godowns. However, in W.P.No.26943 of 2010 an observation was made to the effect that any steps taken by the respondent shall be subject to the outcome of the writ petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel for the respondent-Corporation. It is now brought to the notice of the Court that the tenders were processed and the successful tenderers were awarded the works also. The petitioners do not intend to pursue the matter further except that they seek a direction from the Court for refund of the Earnest Money Deposit. Hence, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent to refund the Earnest Money Deposit deposited by the petitioners along with the tenders within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY 14th March 2011 dr