Crl.M.No.M-11207 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-11207 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 20, 2010 Dharambir .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.R.N.Lohan, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.279, dated 2.4.2010, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar, Hisar, District Hisar. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully. Brief allegations against the petitioner-accused are that sale- deed regarding land of Dungar son of Parsa, who was dead and having no LR, was forged in favour of present applicant-petitioner and the sale-deed was witnessed by co-accused Ram Parshad, Namberdar and Virender son of Dalip. The FIR was lodged on the complaint of Sikander Singh, Naib Tehsildar. It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that he is the bone fide purchaser for consideration and that he belongs to the another village and did not know that Dunger already expired. Allegations against petitioner-accused are serious in nature. He is beneficiary of the said sale deed executed on behalf of the dead person, who was having no LR and hence, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any Crl.M.No.M-11207 of 2010 (O&M) -2- opinion on the merits, the present petition filed by petitioner-Dharambir for grant of anticipatory bail is dismissed being devoid of any merit. 20.4.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge