1 AO 333 OF 2011 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.333 OF 2011 Shrirang Narvankar .. appellant. -versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay .. Respondent. Mr. Mohit Jadhav, for the appellant. Ms. K.K. Soraan for respondent corporation. CORAM: A. S. OKA, J. DATED: 20th April, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel, appearing for appellant and learned counsel appearing for the respondent. By the impugned order, relief of ad interim injunction has been declined by the trial Court. The suit has been filed by the appellant restraining respondent from demolishing the suit structure which is more particularly described in paragraph (1) of the plaint. 2. Ad interim relief claimed was of injunction restraining respondent from demolishing suit structure otherwise than by following due process of law. Appellant has placed on record census certificate dated 12th December, 1980. The said certificate stands in the name of predecessor of the appellant. The Census certificate has been referred to in the agreement dated 9th January, 1989. Considering census 2 AO 333 OF 2011 certificate and agreement, this was a case where limited ad interim injunction ought to have been granted by the trial Court. Hence, I pass the following order. ORDER i) Till the disposal of Notice of Motion, there will be ad interim relief restraining respondents from demolishing the suit structure without following due process of law, subject to condition that even the appellant will maintain status quo in respect of suit structure. ii) The Notice of Motion shall be decided on its own merits without being influenced by the impugned order as well as order of this Court granting ad interim relief. iii) Appeal from Order is disposed of in above terms. iv) Civil Application No.333 of 2011, does not survive and the same is disposed of. (A. S. OKA, J.)