IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34351 of 2008 1.DHANANJAY CHAUBEY, son of Chandeshwar Chaubey 2.Manoj Kumar Mishra @ Manoj Mishra, son of Late Rama Mishra both resident of village Mahmmadpur, P.S. Mahmmadpur, District Gopalganj … Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ….. Opposite party ----------- 04/ 19.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, which was registered against six unknown accused, as it is said that a sum of Rs. 60,000/- was snatched from the informant on National Highway No. 28 near Mansa Baba Temple. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have not been put on Test Identification Parade and other similarly situate accused persons have been admitted to the privilege of bail by another Bench of this Court. Perusal of the order admitting other accused persons to the privilege of bail does not indicate that their antecedent was seen by the Court while admitting them to the privilege of bail. In compliance of my earlier order dated 11.11.2008, supplementary affidavit has been filed giving details of the antecedent of the petitioners and therefrom it appears that besides the present case, petitioners are also accused in a case under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. In the circumstances, at this stage, when petitioners are in jail custody since 16.6.2008 and 4.7.2008, I am not inclined to 2 admit them to the privilege of bail. This application is, accordingly, rejected with liberty to the petitioners to renew their prayer for bail after completing nine months in jail custody. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)