IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22976 of 2010 BHARAT ROY @ CHHOTU ROY S/O NIRMAL ROY Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SURENDRA SINGH S/O SRI KRISHNA BHAGWAN SINGH ----------- 2. 9.7.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the victim stated in her statement u/s.164 Cr.P.C. that she got married to the petitioner and had been living with him out of her own sweet will. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 29.3.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in Dumraon P.S.case No.124 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two - 2 - consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The Magistrate concerned is directed to immediately commit the case for trial and thereafter the trial court will pass appropriate orders as to whether any offence is made out against the accused persons in view of the medical report and the statement of the victim. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )