Civil Writ Petition No. 4696 of 2010 ***** Sunil Kumar and others versus State of Haryana and others Present: Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG, Haryana for the State. ***** Counsel for the petitioners could not show if there is any move on the part of the respondents to make any appointment either on regular or contract basis after relieving the petitioners. The counsel will attribute this to the stay order granted by this Court. Be that as it may, the petitioners were on contractual employment, which has come to an end. In case, any move is made by the respondents to make any fresh contractual appointment, they may have a cause to invoke. The writ petition, accordingly, is dismissed at this stage as premature with liberty to the petitioners to move as and when any cause arises for them to file such a petition. July 26, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE