1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 171 OF 2009 Shri Shriniwas Anant Ghanekar & Anr. ...Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharahtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Bharat Khanna, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. V.A.Sonpal, A panel Counsel for respondent No.1 to 9. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 21st January, 2010. P.C. In our opinion, consequent on the Urban Land Ceiling Act being repealed, we do not find that this is a fit case to exercise our Extraordinary Jurisdiction. The contention of the petitioner is that considering the repeal of the Act, the steps were not taken and correspondingly in the survey records the name of the State should be deleted. Such an exercise will not be done by this Court in the PIL Petition at the instance of the petitioner, who is ventilating not public grievance, but some private grievance. It is for those owners to approach the concerned authorities with whatever steps in law they are entitled to. The petition is dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)