THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WP NO.13955 of 2000 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Smt Justice T.Meena Kumari) Questioning the order passed in O.A.No.8360 of 1998 filed by the respondent herein claming to pay arrears of salary from 1.12.1994 to 30-12-1998, the present writ petition has been preferred. The facts of the case are that the respondent-applicant was appointed as Part-Time Instructor in Garment Making and Knitting by the District Educational Officer, Krishna, vide Proceedings in R.C.No.62-C6/88, dated 27-10-1988 on consolidated pay. Subsequently, she was terminated and reappointed. Thereafter, she was exempted from appearing before the District Selection Committee and she was appointed as Full Time M.T.I (Tailoring) on 26-11-1994 in the time scale of 1975-4100 and her services were regularized with effect from 30-11-1994 and continued as such. As her salary was not paid during the tenure as Full Time MTI, she filed O.A.No.8360 of 1998. In the counter filed in the said OA, the fact of appointment of the applicant was admitted. However, it is stated that no orders were received from the Director of School Education about the payment of salaries to the applicant. Basing on the admissions in the counter, the Tribunal allowed the O.A and directed the 3rd respondent therein to pay salary to the applicant in accordance with the rules from the date of her appointment as MTI (Tailoring) for the period for which she rendered service calculating it upto 31-12-1998 as expeditiously as possible, in any event within eight weeks. Further, the Director of School Education, Hyderabad was directed to give necessary clarification sought for by the Chief Executive Officer in his letters dated 13-1-1995 and 11-9-1998 as expeditiously as possible. Against the said order, the present writ petition has been filed. Heard the learned Counsel on record and perused the material available on record. It is the case of the petitioners-authorities that the respondent- applicant is not entitled for claiming the Full-Time salary as her appointment is purely on temporary basis. The material on record and the counter filed before the Tribunal go to show that the respondent-applicant was appointed as Full-Time MTI in the time scale of 1975-4010 and the said fact was also found place in the Memo dated 25.2.2002 and that the payment of salaries to the applicant is not made only on the ground that the Director of School Education has not given clarification. Now, the stand taken by the writ petitioners that the applicant is a part time instructor, is not tenable. Since the applicant is working for a long time and the authorities have extracted the work from her for all these years as full time MTI, the claim of the respondent-applicant cannot be denied. In this view of the matter, we feel that the order of the Tribunal needs no interference and as such the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________________________ (JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI) ______________________________________ (JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA) rkk Dated: 20-07-2010