Q @ :;-;é§§g;}§@ $53M}? IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S: hgog /2011 / Lela Bai Baiga W/o Kashiram Baiga aged about 37 years, Cast Baiga, Working as Shiksha Karmi Grade — 3 Primary School Balak Gullidand R/o village Ratanpur Mali Badi Tah. Ratanpur Dist. Bilaspur C.G. PETITIONER VERSUSE x“ l. State of Chhatishgarh through :— The Secretary Department of Panchayat & Rural Development , Mantralay, D.K.S. , Bhawan , Raipur C.G. RS ESPONDENT 2. The Cast Scrutiny Committee , Pandit Ravishankar Vishvavidyalaya Parisar Raipur , Distt. Raipur C.G. 3. The Chief Executive Officer , Janpad Panchayat Marwahi , ‘Distt. Bilaspur C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER SECTION 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 3a WW, WW, WW @ 1 ’L 200 m m mafiaw) T. mmm I ammm Wm 'trmaff ‘§ Fw {Tag-R $ aim m mm 1W ané‘a B : Hon’ble Shri Manindra M an Shrivastava 11-08-2011 Shri Amit Kumar, couns Ifor the petitioner. Shri A.V. Shridhar, Pan i Lawyer for the State. The grievance of the etitioner as stated in the petition is that the respondent authorities are re uiring the petitioner to produce reievant caste certificate duiy Verified by the High Levei Caste Scrutiny Committee but so far enquiry before the Com ittee is not complete and the matter is stiii pending. He further submits hat the Committee has required the petitioner to submit various documents nd whatever information and documents are in possession of the petition r, have aiready been submitted. He further submits that for one reason r the other, the matter is stiii pending before the Committee without dnai d cision and the petitioner is apprehending that the department may take disci iinary action against him or may terminate for want of duiy verihed caste ce iticate. The iearned State co nsel submitted that as the matter of caste scrutiny of the petitioner is p ding before the Committee, the same wiii be decided according to iaw an the petitioner be directed to furnish aii the documents including those documents which are demanded by the Committee from the petitioner From the pieadings an documents which are recorded, it is apparent the caste status of the petitioner is pending before the State Level Caste $crutiny Committee and certain documents are that the enquiry with regard t S J. XI-HC 78 3a WW, @mng, W a?) . wgé). ws..&¥if"{2i «L 200 warm m m (1WKH) 1 q- mwm‘ mnufgaazml fQ .. WW'WF?H§F§& I'mgri ammm $Wm demanded from the petition r and the petitioner submits that whatever been submitted. Be that as it may, the committee is required to decide the matter within a reaSonabie time. The petitioner shall place before the Committee aii the information and documents which are in his possession within a period of month from today. The department shalt not take any coercive steps against the petitioner on account of non-submission of verified caste scrutiny certificate for further p eriod of six months. documents are avaitabte, hav With the aforesaid directions, the petition is tinaiiy disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Deepti Judge