( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3803 OF 2007 IN APPEAL NO.593 OF 2007 APPEAL NO.593 OF 2007 APPEAL NO.593 OF 2007 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.125 OF 2002 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2609 OF 1993 IN SUIT NO.4326 OF 1993 Harkisan Chhotalal Wadhwana .. Appellant V/s Narendra Chhotalal Wadhwana .. Respondent Mr.B.A.Vora for the Appellant. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 27th November, 2007. DATE : 27th November, 2007. DATE : 27th November, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. None appears for the Respondent though served. The learned Counsel for the Appellant undertakes to file affidavit of service within a period of one week from today. 2. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 24 days delay caused in filing the Appeal. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Ad-interim order granted on 9.10.2007 in this Notice of Motion to continue till admission of the Appeal. ( 2 ) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)