IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17603 of 2011 RAHUL RAJ @ GOLU, Son of Late Subodh Sah, R/o Mohalla- K.B.Lal road, Nathnagar, P.S. Nathnagar, District Bhagalpur. ….. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Syed M. Ashraf, Advocate For the State : Mr. Madan Kumar, A.P.P. ------ 2 20.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Section 449 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that it is highly improbable that without consent of the girl the boy has entered in the house of the informant. It is also submitted that the petitioner and the daughter of the informant, namely, Swati Gupta are college going students. Petitioner is stated to be in custody since 15.4.2011. Learned counsel for the State submits that petitioner got encouraged after getting bail in the previous case and committed this offence. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, 2 the petitioner, RAHUL RAJ @ GOLU, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Nathnagar P.S. Case No. 60/2011, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his relationship with the petitioner. If, after his release in this case, the petitioner is again found implicated in similar case, then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)