IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 18677 of 2011(H) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. M.BIJU, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, A.M.U.P.SCHOOL, KAMMANAM, THANUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676 556. 2. N.MOHAMMED UNNI, MANAGER, A.M.U.P.SCHOOL, KAMMANAM, THANUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, TANUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676 556. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MALAPPURAM- 676 556. 3. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 5. R.P.SREENATHAN,UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, A.M.UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, KORMANTHALA, TANUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT- 676 556. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. M.T.SHEEBA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 18677/2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE MANAGER TO THE 1ST PETITIONER 30/03/2010 P2: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30/03/2010 OF THE A.E.O. REJECTING APPROVAL OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE 1ST PETITIONER. P3: COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER DATED 02/07/2010. P4: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 28/01/2004 IN O.P. NO.6959/2003. P5: COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE GOVERNMENT, NO.69525/B-/2010/GEN. EDN. DATED 23/04/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 18677 of 2011-H - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of November, 2011. JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging Ext.P5 communication issued by the Government rejecting the request for approval of appointment of the first petitioner as UPSA. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that Ext.P5 order was issued without hearing the parties and a reasoned order has not been passed also. One of the grounds raised in the writ petition is that the fifth respondent has lost his claim under Rule 51A of Chapter XIV-A K.E.R. It is also submitted that in the light of G.O.(P) No.199/2011, popularly known as the package Government Order, the matter will have to be reconsidered. Therefore, Ext.P5 is quashed. There will be a direction to the Government to re-hear the revision petition with notice to the petitioners and the fifth respondent and pass an order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/