1 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 919 OF 2011 Mr. Girdhari Sagarmal Biyani and Ors. ... Applicants Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. ... Respondents Mr. Daljeet Singh i/by Mr. A.H.H. Ponda, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. Amit Sheth, Advocate for respondent no. 2. Mr. S.A. Shaikh, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 15, 2011 P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the applicants. Issue notice to respondents. The learned A.P.P. waives service. Respondent accepts service. Affidavit of respondent taken on record. The respondent/original complainant is present, identified by the learned counsel. Respondent no. 2/complainant Mr. Mahendra Ashar accepts that he has initiated prosecution being Case No. 6/SW/2008 pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 38th Court, Ballard 2 Pier, Mumbai against the applicant herein. He has no objection if the above proceedings are quashed and set aside as the dispute is resolved. It will not change the complexion of public policy and he does not want to prosecute the same. In the light of the above situation, by virtue of powers under section 482 of Cr.P.C. Application is allowed to the extent of quashing Criminal Case No. 6/SW/2008. A Pay order of Rs. 2 lacs. is handed over by the applicant Ramakant Biyani in court and the same is received by the original complainant/respondent no.2 . (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)