1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1299/2009 ( Praveen Madhavrao Kale .vs. State of Maharashtra ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------------------------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------------------------------------------------------------- - -- CORAM : S.R.DONGAONKAR, J. DATE : 25th JUNE, 2009 Heard Shri Khare, advocate for the applicant and Shri Thakre APP for State. Interim order was passed by this court on 9.4.2009. On 23.4.2009, by order of this court it was pointed out that the contention of th learned counsel for the applicant is that the father of the complainant has lodged similar report against the applicant at Kharangana Police Station and in that case state had submitted reply that no offence was registered against applicant. It appears that the complainant is in habit of lodging such report, hence interim order needs to be confirmed as under: In the event of arrest of the applicant in Crime No.58/2009, for the offences u/s 420, 468 of IPC, registered by P.S.Wardha City, he be released on bail on his furnishing PRB and surety of Rs.25000/- subject to conditions that he shall not directly or indirectly tamper with 2 prosecution evidence and shall report P.S.Wardha City as and when directed by the I.o., for the purposes of investigation. It is made clear that above observations are in prima facie view of the matter and they shall not influence the learned trial Judge while deciding anything on merit. Liberty to the prosecution to move for cancellation of anticipatory bail, if the circumstances so warrant later. Application stands disposed of. JUDGE SMP