IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2080 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2080 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2080 OF 2007 Shri Shrimanta Vaghappa Gogan. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. V.V.Purwant i/b. W.I.Shaikh for the applicant. Y.S.Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 13th July 2007. DATED: 13th July 2007. DATED: 13th July 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in connection with C.R.No.I-83/2007 registered with the Bhivandi Shaher Police Station for the offences punishable under sections 372, 373, 366(A) of Indian Penal Code read with sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7(1)(a) of the Immoral Traffic Act. The applicant was arrested on 24th April, 2007 and produced before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ulhasnagar. After remaining in P.C.R. for sufficient time he was granted M.C.R. and, presently, he is in Adharwadi Jail, Kalyan. 3. After having perused the record of the investigating officer, in my opinion, there is sufficient material on record to show that the applicant himself used to bring the minor girls for the purpose of prostitution and that he is a brothel keeper. There is also material on record to show that his livelihood is being earned out of the prostitution activities. Earlier applications made by the applicants were rejected by the Sessions Court. Under these circumstances, in my opinion, this is not a fit case for grant of bail. 4. Application is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE