IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 13426 of 2008. Decided on: 29.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Inder Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he had been appointed as Chowkidar on daily wage basis in the respondent- department in the year 1988 and has completed ten years service with 240 days in each calendar year. Respondents have not chosen to file any reply to the present petition. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for conferment of work-charged status if he has completed ten years service with 240 days in each calendar year as per the law laid down by their Lordships of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mool Raj 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - Upadhyaya versus State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supp.(2) SCC, 316 within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner, with all consequential benefits. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 29, 2010. (sck).