IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16512 of 2010 PRASURAM YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 17.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence in a Police case under Sections 25 (1-b) a, 26/35 of the Arms Act is that the recovery is alleged from his house, but co- accused Indal Yadav and Ajay Yadav, who were apprehended running away with the fire-arms from the house of the petitioner have been enlarged on bail in Cr. Misc. No. 31059 of 2009 and Cr. Misc. No. 41039 of 2009. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 106 of 2009. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)