WP(C) 6109/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE H. BARUAH. Heard Mr. M.U. Mandal, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. M. Kh ataniar, learned standing counsel, Education Department for respondent Nos. 1,2, 5,6 and 7 and Mr. S. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 as well a s Mr. B.C. Saikia, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Since all the respondents are represented by their respective counsel today and accepted notice on their behalf, no formal notice to those respondents is called for. As agree to by the learned counsel for both the parties, this matter is taken up for final disposal at the motion stage. In the year 2002 under Assam Sarba Siksha Abhijan Mission a scheme under name an d style Education Guarantee Scheme (for short EGS) Centre was established in Si ngirbondh village in Karimganj District in view of non-existent of any education al institution in the locality. After establishment of the said center, the appr opriate authority appointed two Siksha Mitras for imparting education to childre n. In the meantime the Government of Assam by notification dated 31-12-2009 up g raded 1521 nos. of EGS Centres in Assam including Singriband EGS Centre to lower primary school and sanctioned 7 lakhs to each of EGS for constructing school bu ilding. It has been alleged by the petitioners herein that both the Siksha Mitras of the center in assiciation with some officials are planning to construct the school building at Nalarpar village instead of Singribond village. Being known the fact of such move, the petitioners along with others approached the Block Elementary Education Officer and requested him not to allow construction of the school bui lding at Nalarpar village instead of Singirbond. It is contended further that as per the Government decision the Singirbond EGS is up graded to a primary level school and accordingly sanctioned Rs. 7,00,000/- for construction of the buildin g. If the building is not constructed as desired by the Government of Assam, the children of the Singirbond area would be deprived of education and they would b e seriously effected. The petitioner, therefore, in order to prevent constructio n of the building at Nalarpar submitted a representation to the Block Elementary Education Officer requesting the authority to take appropriate steps for constr uction of the school building at Singirbond and utilise the money accordingly. The learned counsel of both the parties, therefore, agree that the representatio n so filed by the petitioners along with others may directed to be disposed of w ithin a time frame, which could serve the purpose of writ under Article 226 of t he Constitution of India. Having taken care of the facts involved in this case as well as the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties and in view of the filing o f the representation by the petitioners to the Block Elementary Education Office r, Block Mission Co-ordinator, Ramkrishna Nagar, Karimganj, Assam, it is directe d that the respondent authorities shall consider the representation of the petit ioners and take appropriate decision in respect of the construction of the schoo l building at Singirbond. This exercise shall be made within a period of one month from today. With this direction, this petition stands disposed of.