IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4443 of 2008 Date of decision:16.03.2009 Haryana Institute of Civil Aviation ...Petitioner versus Chander Dhar Dhyani and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr.Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Jasmeet Singh Bedi, Advocate for the respondents. 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. Order setting aside the revision petition ex parte has been passed on 27.07.2006 and ultimately the petition filed on 28.03.2007. The application to set aside the order was not filed within 30 days prescribed under the provisions of Gratuity Rules but it had been filed on 16.05.2007. The Court below has considered the fact that the petition was not filed within time and that it was barred by law of limitation. It was also found that the reasons attributed for non appearance was not established. The discretion exercised is justified and there is no scope for revision. 2. Revision petition is accordingly dismissed. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 16.03.2009 sanjeev