IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2008 / 10TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 24022 of 2008(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- M.P. MOIDEENKUTTY, S/O. BEERANKUTTY, VALIYAMUKKATH HOUSE, MUKKOM, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.A.K.ABDUL AZEEZ RESPONDENT: ---------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.V.MANOJ KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/09/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.24022/08 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF R.C.BOOK OF THE VEHICLE NO.KL-11/R-2104. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF R.C.BOOK OF THE VEHICLE NO.KL-57/A-3859. EXT.P2(a): TRUE COPY OF STAGE CARRIAGE PERMIT KL-11/T 2104. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF REQUEST DT 8.7.2008 BY THE PETITIOERN TO THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P3(a): TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT FOR THE PRESCRIBED FEE PAID BY THE PETITIONER. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 24022 OF 2008 I ==================== Dated this the 1st day of September, 2008 J U D G M E N T In this writ petition, what is sought for by the petitioner is a direction to the respondent to consider Ext.P3 application for replacement of a vehicle. 2. If Ext.P3 has been received and is pending as asserted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, there is no reason why it should not be considered and orders passed. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the respondent shall take up Ext.P3, consider the same and pass orders thereon if Ext.P3 has been received and is pending. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp