IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23555 of 2008 NAND LAL GIRI Versus STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 5. 22.9.2008 Heard. The case related to defalcating Rs. 2,32,519.50 paise only on account of purchasing furnitures. The allegation is that purchases were made by accused Ram Bilash Thakur who was also holding the same post prior to the informant, who is now the petitioner, and he had passed the vouchers, made the payment and also directed the entry of the expenditure in the cash register but without making any entry in the stock register. The allegation further is that repeated directions from the department for production of the documents or for production of the stock register showing the entry yielded no result and, as such, the F.I.R. The fact remains uncontroverted that the said Ram Bilalsh Thakur was granted bail in this case. The Additional Sessions Judge who was passing the rejection order could not 2 accept the contention in absence of production of any order of bail in favour of accused Ram Bilash Thakur but also does not appear negating the submission and appears going on to say that he did not have the reasons upon which the said Ram Bilash Thakur was granted bail. The F.I.R. contains the details of purchase and the said Ram Bilash Thakur is on bail, as indicated above, Let the above named petitioner be directed to be released from custody on his furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in Saharsa P.S.Case No. 318 of 1995. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)