1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.1026 OF 2006 and CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1745 OF 2006 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.1026 OF 2006 Shri.Nana Govind Kadam. ...Appellant. vs. 1.Shri.Motiram Abaji Kadam and another. ...Respondents. --- Mr.Rahul D. Motkari, for Appellant. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & DATED: 9th July,2007. P.C.:- Both the Courts below have concurrently 2 held that the plaintiff appellant has failed to prove that he is exclusive owner of the well which was subject matter of the suit. That being concurrent finding of fact, no substantial question of law arises. The appeal is disposed of. Civil application no.1745 of 2006 is also disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) ---