IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION Nos. 2632, 2910 and 21142 of 2007 Between: T.C.S.Gadwal. … Petitioner And The Prohibition and Excise Superintedent, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District.District Collector, Karimnagar District, … Respondent Counsel for the petitioners: Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy. Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Prohibition and Excise. (Note: The parties and counsel are common in all the three Writ Petitions) This Court made the following: COMMON ORDER:- At the interlocutory stage these Writ Petitions are taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. These three Writ Petitions are filed questioning cancellation of licenses to the petitioner-Society for vending toddy in respect of three counters. At the hearing, N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in pursuance of coming into force of the new Excise Rules framed in G.O.Ms.No.1228, Revenue (Ex.II) Department, dated 19-9-2007, the licenses of the petitioner-Society in respect of the said three counters have been restored treating the alleged act of adulteration as a first offence. In view of this fact, which is not controverted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise, the cause in these Writ Petitions does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, all the Writ Petitions are disposed of as infructuous. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:03-6-2009 MNR