I * ‘. — l”, k r v swan 55km a? (@7/ / U) IN THE HO‘N'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) No. mgg OF 2009 (8.3.) PETITIONER / Jayant Kumar Barai S/o Shri Jagdish Chandra Barai, aged about 35 years, R/o Near Shanti Kirana Stores, Sangam Chowk, ' Laxmi Nagar, Pachpedi Naka, Ring Road No.1, Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : / 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through: The Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, D. K. S. , Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Janpad Panchayat Magarload, District Dhamta'ri (C.G.), through its Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Magarload, District Dhamtari (C.G.). The Zila Panchayat Dhamtari (C.G.), through its Chief Executive Officer. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1’ PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER. As given in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS. As given in the cause title. Vi)“ \b‘) \\‘° WMWW ammm \r WW,WWW . \APm ‘ézm WW anéw w (Wu) W Wm B : HON’BLE SHRI JUSTIC S E G8.Q8.2099 Shri P.K.Tulsyan, counse Shri Sumesh Bajaj, G.A. At the outset, counsel f0 present petition with liberty t‘ raising all the grievances of the appointed as Shiksha Karmi Cn Collector may not entertain hi barred and therefore direction l appeal on merits. issued to decide the appeal of t1 las no objection if such direction is Accordingly, the petitio directed that in the eventuali petitioner along with the applici period of two weeks from the d: the Collector would decide the of limitation, in accordance witl lt is made clear that this on merits of the case and the é the appeal on its own merits. mwa‘wm ewm RIT‘NKER DIWAKER l for the netitioner‘ for the State. " the petitioner wants to withdraw the 3 file an appeal before the Collector petitioner in respect of his claim to be Wade III. He however submits that the s appeal as the same would be time >e issued to the Collector to decide his Counsel for the State l 1e petitioner on merits. '1 is dismissed as Withdrawn. It is :y of filing any such appeal by the ition for condonation of delay Within a 1te of receipt of the copy of this order, same expeditiously ignoring the point i law. Court has not expressed any opinion luthority Would be at liberty to decide Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker m Judge