IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 12402 of 2008. Decided on: 25.8.2011. ___________________________________________________________ Virender Thakur … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. ___________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. AG and Mr.Anil Jaswal, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State. ___________________________________________________________ V.K. Sharma, Judge (Oral). The petition has been filed with the following prayers, vide para 7 (i) & (ii):- “7 (i). That the present O.A. may kindly be allowed and the salary as fixed in view of Annexure A-1 may kindly be declared as void ab initio and set aside along with arrears. (ii). That the respondents be directed to pay the revised pay scale from the initial date of appointment.” 2. There is no reply as yet. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is covered under judgment dated 17.11.2009 rendered by this Court in Nek Ram and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, CWP (T) No. 14232 of 2008. 4. In view of the above, if on facts the case of the petitioner is covered under the judgment dated 17.11.2009 referred to hereinabove in CWP (T) No. 14232 of 2008 and he is similarly 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 situate, he shall also be treated similarly without any discrimination and benefit of the said judgment shall be extended to him within three months from the date of production of copies of this judgment and the judgment referred to hereinabove by the petitioner before the respondents/competent authority. 5. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (V.K. Sharma) Judge. August 25, 2011. (cr)