FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2833 OF 2011 "Ananda Sambhaji Kagane Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. V.G. Sakolkar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.S. Patil, Assistant Govt. Pleader for respondents. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 23RD AUGUST, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] The petitioner was appointed on compassionate ground on the condition that he would acquire certain qualification/eligibility within a period of two years. 2] Since the petitioner did not acquire the qualification within a period of two years, his services were terminated. Being aggrieved thereby, the petitioner approached the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The learned Tribunal has rejected the original application filed by the petitioner. Hence, the present petition. 3] Shri Sakolkar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has now acquired the necessary qualification. He , therefore, prays that the respondents be directed to consider the representations filed by the petitioner on FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2833 OF 2011 "Ananda Sambhaji Kagane Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 sympathetic ground. 4] Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner was appointed on compassionate ground, and that he has now acquired the necessary qualification, we direct respondent No.2, to consider the representation made by the petitioner, within a period of two months from today, sympathetically, and communicate the decision to the petitioner. 5] Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-