IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH JULY 2007 / 13TH ASHADHA 1929 RFA.No. 509 of 2004() --------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS.955/1994 of SUB COURT,KOTTAYAM .................... APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: ------------------------------------- K.C.BABU, S/O.CHELLAPPAN ACHARI, NATARAJA BHAVAN, KANJIRAPPALLY. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN RESPONDENT: DEFENDANT: ------------------------------------------ P.M.SIVADAS, D/O.MADHAVAN PILLAI, PANTHAPLACKAL HOUSE, KOOVAPPALLY VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN SRI.K.MOHAMMED FAISAL NAHA THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/07/2007 ALONG WITH RFA NO. 106 OF 2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------------ R.F.A 509 of 2004 & R.F.A 106 of 2006 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of July, 2007 JUDGMENT R.F.A. 509 of 2004 When this appeal is taken up for hearing the learned counsel appearing for the appellant in R.F.A 509/2004 submitted that the matter has been settled out of court. He has also filed a memo to that effect. In view of the facts stated in the Memo the appeal is dismissed as settled out of court and one half of the court fee paid, shall be refunded to the appellant R.F.A 106/2006 This appeal was withdrawn from the Additional District Court Kottayam, to be heard along with R.F.A. 509/2004 Today the counsel for the appellant in R.F.A. 509 of 2004 submitted that the matter has been settled out of court. So this appeal is also dismissed as settled out of court. So these two appeals are dismissed as settled out of court K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE es