In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... F.A.O. No.4571 of 2007 ..... Date of decision:29.7.2011 Director, Food and Suplies, Punjab and another .....Appellants v. Sat Kartar Rice and General Mills, Nihalsinghwala and others .....Respondents .... CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL ..... 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ...... Present: Mr. Ranbir S. Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for the appellants. Mr. Mukand Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. ..... Mohinder Pal, J. Learned counsel for the respondents, during the course of arguments, very fairly conceded that the question involved in the instant appeal is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in District Food and Supplies, Controller, Moga v. M/s Aggarwal Rice Mills, Baghapurana, District Moga, 2010 (1) RCR (Civil) 756. Learned counsel for the State has no objection if this appeal is disposed of in terms of the above decision of this Court. F.A.O. No.4571 of 2007 [2] In view of the statement made by both the learned counsels, this appeal is disposed of in the same terms as in District Food and Supplies, Controller, Moga v. M/s Aggarwal Rice Mills, Baghapurana, District Moga (supra). July 29, 2011. (Mohinder Pal) Judge *hsp*