IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal I Bail Application No.358 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Mohd. Akmal S/o Mohd. Irfan, R/o Village Majri, P.S. Sahaspur, District Dehradun ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party Arising out of Case Crime No.9 of 2010, U/s 498-A/323/307 IPC & 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Sahaspur, District Dehradun Dated: April 21, 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Pawan Mishra, Adv. for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant had not demanded any dowry from his wife and the allegations made in the FIR against him are general in nature and as per the injury report of the victim, all the injuries were shown to be simple in nature. Further he is in jail since last three months and has no previous criminal history. After considering all the facts and circumstances, perusing the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Mohd. Akmal be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Dehradun. The bail application is allowed accordingly. 21.04.2010 Rajeev Dang (Dharam Veer, J.)