IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M. No. 17407 of 2010 & CWP. No. 16478 of 2010 Date of Decision: 8.12.2010. Shiv Kumar & others --Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Ms. Seema Pasricha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.D. Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana for respondent no.1. Mr. Parveen Gupta, Advocate for respondents no. 2 to 4. Mr. Manoj Kaushik, Advocate for respondent no.5. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Application is allowed. Written statement of respondent no.5 taken on record. CWP No. 16478 of 2010 The only prayer made in this petition is for a direction to the respondents to replace the defective two transformers in the meter Account Nos. AP-41-1182 (old no.F-2-296) and AP-41-1208 (old no.F-2-328) in village Faridpur, Tehsil Gharaunda, Distt. Karnal. Mr. Parveen Gupta, learned counsel appearing for respondents no.2 to 4 submits that the respondents have already written to the concerned company, who supplied the transformers for replacement. The fact remains that the transformers are defective and require to be replaced. It is the obligation of the respondents-U.H.B.V.N Ltd. to replace the transformers. It is further contended on behalf of the CWP. No. 16478 of 2010 -2- respondents that the petitioners are not permitting them to replace the transformers. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners will ensure the replacement of the transformers at the site and will not obstruct in replacement of the transformers rather they will facilitate. In view of the above statement, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents no.1 to 4 to replace the defective transformers within a period of four weeks and the petitioners would facilitate the replacement. Respondents are also at liberty to seek help from local police, if, required for the purpose. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 8.12.2010. lucky