IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15119 of 2008 NARESH RAI, son of late Satahu Rai, resident of village – Bhisa alias Madhopur Raushan, P.S. Dumra, District – Sitamarhi. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 21.5.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. Submission of the counsel verges on appraisal of facts and evidence which have come during the course of investigation. How much the incident is true and how much is false, can only be settled after the trial is held. The Court does not find any illegality in the order taking cognizance. In view of the material no case is made out for interference under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The application is dismissed. Dismissal of the quashing application would not come in the way of petitioner while raising all such questions, which may be available to him at the time of framing of charge, if not done already. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J )