IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH OCTOBER 2008 / 7TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 8658 of 2008(E) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- NELLUVELLIL BABY, S/O. JOSEPH, AGED 42 YEARS, NIDIYANGA AMSOM, KAVUMBAYI DESOM, CHUNDAKUNNU, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.U.SHAILAJAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SREEKANDAPURAM POLICE STATION, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TALIPARAMBA. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KANNUR DISTRICT. 4. THANKACHAN NELLUMKUZHIYIL, S/O. ABRAHAM, AGED 38 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, PAYAVOOR AMSOM, PAISAKKARI, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. 5. BABY NELLUMKUZHIYIL, S/O. ABRAHAM, AGED 52 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, PAYAVOOR AMSOM, CHANDANAKKAMPARA,TALIPARAMBA TALUK,KANNUR DISTRICT ADV. SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT FOR R4 & 5 SRI.K.N.ABHILASH FOR R4 & 5 SMT.R.LEELA FOR R4 & 5 GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.A.SALIM – R1 TO R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC 8658/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS. EXT.P1 - TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 25.11.2007. EXT.P2 - TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 29.11.2007. EXT.P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 28.12.2007 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 8658 OF 2008-E ----------------------------------------- Dated 29th October, 2008. JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioner has approached this Court, alleging that respondents 4 and 5, who are his brothers-in-law, are threatening and physically harassing him. He apprehends that he may be killed by them. Therefore, he has preferred Exts. P1 to P3 representations respectively before respondents 1 to 3, who are police officers. Alleging that the said officers did not take any action, this writ petition is filed. 2. The learned Government Pleader, upon instructions, submitted that both the parties were summoned to the Police Station and a detailed enquiry was conducted into all the complaints. He further submitted that at present there is no threat to the life of the petitioner from the part of respondents 4 and 5. The learned counsel appearing WPC 8658/2008 2 for respondents 4 and 5 submitted that the said respondents have no intention, whatsoever, to physically harm or harass the petitioner. The above submissions of the learned Government Pleader and the learned counsel for respondents 4 and 5 are recorded and the Writ Petition is disposed of. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE. Nm/