IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42093 of 2009 1. ARVIND SINGH 2. Anil Singh Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 09.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners are cousin of the husband. A vague allegation is levelled against them also while the differences were there in between the wife and husband and she might have consumed poison which does not justify the refusal of anticipatory bail of the petitioners. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Barhara (Krishnagarh) P.S. Case No. 44 of 2008, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bhojpur, Ara subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)