IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 452 of 1990 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- KANTILAL KODARJI KATARA Versus DIRECTOR GENERAL& INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 452 of 1990 MR YN OZA for Petitioner No. 1-41 GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 1-3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR Date of decision: 30/06/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT By filing this petition, the petitioner has prayed that appropriate writ, order may be issued for setting aside the circular dated 1st August, 1998 issued by the State Government, which is at Annexure-A and it may be held that S.S.C. passed armed constables can be transferred to unarmed branch. 2) At the time of admitting this matter, this Court has passed the following order : "Rule, to be heard along with Special Civil Application No.658/1989." 3) Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in this matter is already decided by this Court in Special Civil Application No.658/1989, Special Civil Application No.35/1992 and Special Civil Application No.1001/1988. Copy of the orders passed in above matters are kept on record. 4) Since it has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the point involved in Special Civil Application No.658/1989 and other cognate matters is similar to one, which is involved in this petition, therefore, nothing further is required to be done in this matter and the matter is required to be dismissed. 5) Accordingly, this petition is dismissed in view of the decision given by this Court in the aforesaid group of petitions. Rule is discharged. Interim relief, if any, shall stand vacated. No costs. (P.B.Majmudar,J.) /malek