IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. RFA No.305 of 2003. Judgment Reserved on: 30.03.2010. Date of decision: 05.05.2010. LAC & Another ……Appellants Versus Om Parkash & Others …..Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Appellants: Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General. For the respondents: Mr.Bhupender Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Neeraj Gupta, Advocate. Dev Darshan Sud, J. The decision in RFA No.318 of 2003, titled: State of Himachal Pradesh and Others vs. Shri Sachida Nand and Another, decided on April 6, 2010 alongwith other connected appeals, covers the controversy between the parties in this appeal as the purpose of acquisition is the same, the area where the land is situated is also same and the purpose for acquisition is also the same. This appeal is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers are allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 CMP Nos.845 of 2005, 846 of 2005, In, RFA No.318 of 2003, titled: State of Himachal Pradesh and Others vs. Shri Sachida Nand and Another, decided on April 6, 2010, the application of the State for leading additional evidence was considered. The very same sale deeds which were the subject matter for consideration in RFA No.318 of 2003 are sought to be proved on the record of this case. These applications are accordingly dismissed. CMP No.781 of 2009 and CMP(M) No.1074 of 2009. Allowed. May 5, 2010. (Dev Darshan Sud) (aks) Judge.