.•-i^%£?5IS .^••'"^'v::.^""" .„••"' ^•^'^^^^-"^' ^•'^^' 'ye.s^""'^-- c. F.t®3 IN THS MtGH C€»URTOF 34JDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHt-lAmSGARH WRIT PETITION:NO.^^ /2006 PETITIQNER RESPONDENT *c Suresh Kumar, aged about 44 years, SonofLafeShriRamChandra, s LecturerGovt.GirlHigherSchool, 1 Vaishali Nagar, Bhilai, Durg (C.G.) VERSUS , I; 1. State of Chhattisgarh ' ' Through - Secretary ^ EduGationDepartment i DX.S.Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) ' i i- 2. Directon Public Education Directorate O.K^8A^ | Raipur(C.G.) C^^WRIT PETITtON UNEER ARTICLEJ226/227^ Qf THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA as tincler:- r" XI-HC-78 +11HWI Sb+liqi • 3^'B(PTT?FT, ®Tn*1'16,fslcliyy •hw...9.^PM..^ 200 (. 3T1^?T(Rq7 (i^q(^'si^ff) •an^rw R-li+ daiTsn^Tstiiicti Ban/e •w ^' ^ ^cTTWBfsa'an^T 2^-7-W :- Shri R.S. Shrivastava, counsel Shri Sumesh Bajaj, respondents, on advance copy. Heard both the counsel. The impugned transfer ordei| lunder the Ratiopalization Scheme Scheme provides for an appeal, efficacious remedy avaitable and Hence the writ petition is dismissed. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.27 Iforthepetifoner. Govelrnment Advocate for the State/ dated 13-7-2006 has been passed Oated 1-6-2006 and Clause-7 of the th^refore, the petitioner hasalternative shoutd have availed ttiat remedy. Ms <t>l'i|fa41-f ITTIIcff ff te'^1' <f»l'UK ^Srf^ITSd^T 98Q006 also stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.