t'' ->- •-^' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR Single Bench Hon'bte Shri H.L. Dattu, C.J. ContemDtPetition No.26 of 2004 Petitioner Vs. Re^pondent Kamal Chand Jain, son of Shri Maniklal, aged about40 yeare, partner M/s Vimal Gonstructiohs, a partnership firm r^istered under the Indiari Partn6rship Act,1932, having its office at Ravi Bhawan; Jai Stambh Chowk, G.E. Road/Raipur [C.G.] Manoj Dey;Superintending Engineer, City Circle, Chhattisgarh State ElectricHy Board, Danganiya, Raipur [C.G.] Present: None appears for the petitioner. ORALORDER (Passed on 14"'March, 2007) The pet'rtion was calted out for hearing twice. On both the occasions.noneappeared nor any representation was made on behalf ofthe petitioner. !t appears that We petitioner is not interested in the matter. (2) In the circumstence, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- Cbief Jusfice