HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P. No. 3550 of 2009 TUESDAY THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2009 Between: K.V. Prasad Rao .. Petitioner And R.Nagaraju and two others .. Respondents O R D E R:- This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 10.07.2009 passed in I.A.No.526 of 2009 in I.A. No.139 of 2009 in O.S. No. 60 of 2009 by the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Cyberabad, Kukatpally at Miyapur, whereby the application filed by the 1st respondent-plaintiff under Section 151 CPC seeking to provide necessary police aid to him in respect of the suit schedule property, was allowed. The 1st respondent-plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No.60 of 2009 for grant of permanent injunction along with an application in I.A. No.139 of 2009 seeking temporary injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. The learned Additional Junior Civil Judge, Miyapur granted temporary injunction vide his order dated 15.04.2009. Aggrieved by the same, the defendant filed an appeal in C.M.A. No.562 of 2009 on the file of the District Judge, at L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District along with an application in I.A. No.843 of 2009 seeking suspension of the order dated 15.4.2009 and the same is pending. While so, the plaintiff filed I.A. No.526 of 2009 seeking police aid alleging that in spite of grant of temporary injunction by the trial Court, the defendant is trying to interfere with his possession, and the same was allowed. Challenging the same, the defendant has filed the present Civil Revision Petition. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner-defendant has contended that the petitioner-defendant, challenging the order dated 15.04.2009 made in I .A. No.139 of 2009, preferred C.M.A. No.562 of 2009 along with an application in I.A. No. 843 of 2009 seeking suspension of that order, and the matter is still pending. He further contended that even though the 1st respondent-plaintiff filed Vakalat, no counter affidavit is filed in the C.M.A., and taking advantage of the temporary injunction order, the 1st respondent-plaintiff is interfering with his possession. The learned counsel for the 1st respondent-plaintiff has vehemently contended that the trial Court having found that 1st respondent-plaintiff prima facie, was in possession of the suit schedule property, granted order of injunction dated 15.4.2009, restraining the petitioner-defendant from interfering with his possession, and even though the petitioner-defendant filed C.M.A. questioning the order of injunction, the appellate Court did not stay the said order, and that he has already filed his counter in the C.M.A. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner-defendant and the learned counsel for the 1st respondent-plaintiff and perused the order under revision. From the rival contentions put forth by both the learned counsel for the petitioner-defendant and the 1st respondent-plaintiff, it appears that certain serious disputed questions of fact are involved, and having regard to the fact that the suit proceedings are pending before the trial Court and the order of injunction passed by the trial Court in favour of the 1st respondent-plaintiff is the subject matter of proceedings in C.M.A. before the lower appellate Court, which is still pending, I am of the considered opinion that ends of justice would be met if the lower appellate Court is directed to dispose of the I.A. or the main C.M.A. itself expeditiously. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with the following directions: The learned District Judge, L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District is directed to dispose of either the C.M.A. No.562 of 2009 or the application in I.A. No. 843 of 2009 said to have been filed by the petitioner-defendant, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is needless to mention that till the disposal of either the appeal or the application filed along with it, both the parties are directed to maintain Status Quo obtaining as on today. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 11th August, 2009 bcj