IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. W. P. No. 1684 of 2011 Date of Decision : September 01, 2011 Leela Ram @ Dalbir .... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. V. S. Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be satisfied if respondents are directed to dispose of application (Annexure P-1) moved by the petitioner to respondent no.3 within stipulated time frame. In view of the aforesaid limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, but without going into the merits of the claim of the petitioner, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to dispose of, in accordance with law, application (Annexure P-1) moved by the petitioner to respondent no.3 within four months of the receipt of certified copy of this order. September 01, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE