IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 24TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 2ND ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 24673 of 2009(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ T.V.MEENAKSHI, HSA(NATURAL SCIENCE) RAHMANIYA HIGH SCHOOL, AYANCHERY, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DIST. BY ADV. SRI.R.K.MURALEEDHARAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VADAKARA. 4. THE MANAGER, RAHMANIYA HIGH SHOOL, PO.THAROPOYIL, VIA THRIVALLUR. KOZHIKODE DIST. 5. K.MOOSA, HSA(NATURAL SCIENCE), RAHMANIYA HIGH SCHOOL, PO,THAROPOYIL, VIA.,THIRUALLUR, KOZHIKODE DIST. ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN FOR R4 GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.T.MUHAMMED THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.24673/09 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF STAFF FIXATION ORDER DT 19.2.2009 FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2008-09. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE GO(P) 403/2002/G.EDN DATED 4.12.2002. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE GO(P) 226/03/G.EDN DATED 14.6.2003. EXT.P4: A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 7.8.09. EXT.P5: A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT 22.8.2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P6: A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT 14.8.09 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P7: A TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION DATED 25.8.2009 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 24673 OF 2009 (D) ===================== Dated this the 24th day of September, 2009 J U D G M E N T By Ext.P4 passed by the 2nd respondent, petitioner was found to be liable for deployment and accordingly Ext.P6 consequential order was issued. Aggrieved by these orders, petitioner has filed Ext.P7 revision before the 1st respondent and that revision is pending. It was apprehending implementation of Ext.P6 in the meanwhile that she approached this Court and at the stage of admission, this Court passed order dated 26/8/09 that the petitioner shall not be disturbed for a period of one month and that order continues in force. 2. Taking into account the above and having regard to the pendency of Ext.P7 revision before the 1st respondent, I dispose of this writ petition with the following directions. (1) That the 1st respondent shall consider Ext.P7 revision filed by the petitioner with notice to her and the respondents therein. (2) This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment WPC 24673/09 :2 : (3) It is directed that in the meanwhile, until orders are passed as above, interim order dated 26/8/09 passed by this Court will remain in force. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp