c^ \^ IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. \\^7H OF 2011. ^•' PETITIONER /o 1 ^r>--"' \^y> ^^e'. ,^r...^ -c •^ .^ r<^' /Pradeep Kumar Pandey, S/o. late Shri Badri Prasad Pandey, aged about 38 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary School Sidesar, Block Kanker, Districf Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ :1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) ^2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Kanker, Disfa-ict Kanker(C.G.) > '^ 3. The Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bagodar, Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) 4. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, Kanker, Distt. Kanker(C.G.) •IIB::l WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA "teaSig^^- •^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETI'nONER WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1 174 of2011 Pradeep Kumar Pandey. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State Govt. ofCUhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER AR1ICLE 226 OF I'HE CONS'nTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Aenihotri, J. Present: Shri Somkaat Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General foi-the State/ respondents. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on O3''a day ofMarch, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation in the light of circular dated 05.01.2011 (Annexure P/7), passed by the Govemment of Chhattisgarh, School Education Department. 2. Leamed counsel appearing fbr other side has no objection. 3. No pennission ofthis Court is required to make representation to the respondent authorities. Thus, such direction cannot be issued. However, ifthe petitioners make a representation to the respondent authorities, fhe same may be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits and perapective. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is dismissed. di- Amit SatishK.Agi Judge -^-s