1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.3377/1995. : : Prahalad Prasad Meena Vs. Rajasthan Rajya Pathya Pustak Mandal & Anr. : : Date of Order 20.8.2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTI CE MOHAMMAD RAFI Q Mr. S. N. Meena for the petitioner. Mr. Sargam Jain for Mr. Ashok Gaur for the respondents. This writ petition has been filed against the order dated 22.11.1994 by which a sum of Rs.88,826.76 was sought to be recovered from the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that respondents sought to proceed against the petitioner while making recovery on the basis of enquiry report dated 25.1.1995 (Annex.2). Simultaneously they also initiated regular disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner as well as two other employees namely; Ramesh Chand Gupta and Chandgi Ram vide memorandum dated 24.2.1995. In the regular disciplinary enquiry, the petitioner has not been found guilty of charges. 2 Learned counsel for the respondents opposed the writ petition and submitted that recovery was ordered to be made from the petitioner as well as from book seller for whom the petitioner had prepared the cost vouchers. Learned counsel is however not in a position to show as to what is the status of enquiry against the petitioner. Having regard to the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction that if eventually the petitioner is exonerated in the enquiry, the recovery order shall abide by such exoneration order. In case, the petitioner is held guilty and any penalty order is passed against the petitioner, the recovery order would stand. (MOHAMMAD RAFI Q)J. A.Arora/ - Item No.7.