IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4533 of 2011 HARENDRA YADAV @ HARENDAR YADAV, SON OF SRI RAJO YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARHAT, P.S. BARHAT, DISTRICT JAMUI -----PETITIONER Versus 1.THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, NEW DELHI 2.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, NEW DELHI 3.INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, BIHAR SECTOR, PATNA 4.DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GROUP CENTRE, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, NOIDA, UTTARPRADESH 5.DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GROUP CENTRE, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, MUZAFFARPUR 6.COMMANDANT, 166 BN, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, JAMMU, JAMMU & KASHMIR-----------------------------------------------------RESPONDENTS ----------- 2. 11.3.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make corrections in paragraph-9 of the writ petition in the light of the averments made in the supplementary affidavit filed today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner claims similar relief as was granted to the similarly situated petitioners in a batch of four writ petitions, headed by C.W.J.C.No.19731 of 2010 (Mukesh Kumar Singh & Anr. Vs. The Union of India & Ors.), which was disposed of by order dated 14.1.2011 of this Court. The case of the petitioner stands on the similar footing as that of the petitioners of those cases. However, 2 since the matter is being disposed of at the outset it is made clear that while the petitioner would be entitled to the similar direction to the authorities of the C.R.P.F. to pay the entire arrears of salary to the petitioner from the date of issue of letter dated 28.3.2004 till his date of joining, i,e,, 6.3.2006 and also for the arrears of salary for the period between the initial date of his joining pursuant to the appointment letter dated 4.7.2003 till the issue of letter dated 28.3.2004 directing the petitioner to go back home, the same would subject to verification of the said facts by the respondent authorities. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of in the aforesaid terms and in terms of the order dated 14.1.2011 as mentioned above. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) Spal/