IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.686 of 2009 SAHDEO SAH SON OF HARIHAR SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – NEURA LAXMINIYA TOLA, P.S. MINAPUR, DISTRICT MUZUFFARPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MUZUFFARPUR. 3. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE OF MINAPUR, P.S. + DISTRICT – MUZUFFARPUR. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR-CUM-DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, PATIALA, STATE OF PUNJAB. ----------- 03. 19.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The prayer of the petitioner is that in spite of the fact that the court below has taken cognizance and also issued the processes under section 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 31 of 2004, even though the respondents are not apprehending the accused persons and producing before the court concerned. Learned counsel for the State submits that it is for the prosecution to take appropriate steps in the court below with regard to the execution of the processes under section 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C. which is said to have been issued. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter, the same is accordingly disposed. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)