IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44511 of 2009 1.DIPU RAVIDAS son of late Bhutari Ravidas 2.Meena Devi wife of Dipu Ravidas Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.12.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under sections 147, 148, 149,341, 323, 302 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners and the informant belong to the same family and there is no specific overt act against them, let the petitioners above named, who are in custody since 25.8.2009 and have no criminal antecedent be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No.76 of 2008 subject to the following conditions: (a) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how they I are related with the petitioners, (b) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail. (c) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and - 2 - thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (d) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on the date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Md.S. (Anjana Prakash,J.)