IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 831/2009 In S. B. Civil Second Appeal No. 823/2007 Dhanesh Kumar Purohit Vs. Ram Gopal & Another. Date of Order: 08.11.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain,J. None present for the petitioner. Mr. Mahesh Gupta on behalf of Mr. Parag Rastogi, for the respondents. Case called twice. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner even in second round. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that petitioner/decree holder has already taken possession of the rented premises in execution proceedings, therefore, notice of contempt petition may now be discharged. Since no one is present on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, it appears that the petitioner has got possession of the rented premises and he is not interested in prosecuting the present contempt petition. Notice of contempt petition is discharged. Contempt petition stands disposed of. (Narendra Kumar Jain),J. Manoj, Item No.115.