IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 16TH MAGHA 1928 WA.No. 2247 of 2006(E) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.20033/2006 Dated 07/11/2006 .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER: --------------------------- P.V. GEORGE, S/O. VARGHESE, PROPRIETOR, M/S. PERIYAR PROFILES, PADAYATTIL HOUSE, ANGAMALY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.PRAMOD J.DEV SRI.V.P.JOLY RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDHYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, K.S.E.B., ELECTRICAL DIVISION, PERUMBAVOOR. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, K.S.E.B., ELECTRICAL MAJOR SECTION, KALADY. 4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, K.S.E.B., ELECTRICAL SECTION, THURAVOOR. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, Ag.C.J. & ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------- W.A.No.2247 of 2006 ------------------------------- Dated, this the 5th day of February, 2007 JUDGMENT Radhakrishnan, Ag.C.J. Writ petition was preferred seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to give electricity connection to the petitioner's industrial unit. Reference was also made to Exts.P6 and P7. We are of the view that the grievance raised by the petitioner will have to be considered by the Executive Engineer, the second respondent, and not by us in this proceedings. The second respondent shall take note of the grievance raised by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders expeditiously and within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Writ appeal is disposed of accordingly. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, Ag.CHIEF JUSTICE. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. vns