-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS SUMMONS SUMMONS FOR FOR FOR JDUGMENT NO.372 OF 2006 JDUGMENT NO.372 OF 2006 JDUGMENT NO.372 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.2070 OF 2006 NO.2070 OF 2006 NO.2070 OF 2006 Kamlesh S. Shah ...Plaintiff v/s M/s Padmavati Construction Co. and anr. ...Defendants Mr A.V. Jain i/b M/s A.V. Jain and Associates for Plaintiff. None for Defendants. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 7TH NOVEMBER 2006. -2- P.C. :- 1. The learned counsel appearing for plaintiff states that the defendants have been served with the summons for judgment on 15th September 2006. He undertakes to file affidavit of service within one week from today. The defendants have not filed any application seeking leave to defend the suit within the period as prescribed by Order 37 of C.P.C. The plaintiff therefore is entitled to a judgment. I have heard learned counsel appearing for plaintiff. Perused the documents filed with the plaint. Summons for judgment is granted. Suit of the plaintiff is decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Refund of court fees as per rules. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited.