-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1843 OF 1994 Farrokh E.D.Mehta & Anr.... ... Petitioners. Versus Bombay Housing Area Development Board and others..... .... Respondents. Mr. B.M.Sghroff with Ms.Bindu Nair i/by M/s.Little & Co., for the Petitioners. None for the Respondents. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 13TH JUNE, 2007. DATED : 13TH JUNE, 2007. DATED : 13TH JUNE, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: It cannot be disputed that the controversy involved in this petition is the same on facts and law as was in the case of Writ Petition Nos. 3004 of 1988, 1582 of 1990 and 1788 of 1990 which were decided by the Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 28th January, 2002. For the reasons stated in the said Judgment, with which we respectfully agree, we dismiss this writ petition. 2. However, we direct the parties to bear their own -: 2 :- costs. 3. Interim order would continue for a period of eight weeks from today. Sd/- CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.