IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.68 OF 2004 Mrs.Sharda Anant Narute .... Appellant. Vs. Shri Anant Nivrutti Narute .... Respdt. Shri V.D.Raut for appellant . Shri Sandeep K. Mahale for respdt. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & S.R.SATHE,JJ. S.R.SATHE,JJ. S.R.SATHE,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : : : 25th July 2005. PC: 1. Learned counsels for appellant and respondent are present in the court. Appellant-wife and respondent-husband both are present in the court. By filing this Appeal the appellant -wife has challenged ex-parte decree of divorce passed against her. However, now the husband and wife namely respondent and appellant :2: have settled their dispute and they have decided to stay together alongwith their children and accordingly, the Consent Terms have been filed in this Court. Both the parties have stated that they have voluntarily entered into the Consent Terms without being influenced by anybody. We find that the Consent Terms have been voluntarily entered into by the parties and therefore, we accept the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. Since the husband and wife have decided to resume the conjugal relations, impugned decree passed by trial court, is hereby quashed and set aside. 2. The appeal is disposed of in terms of Consent Terms. (S.R.SATHE) (S.R.SATHE) (S.R.SATHE) (S.B.MHASE) (S.B.MHASE) (S.B.MHASE)