IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.32493 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 31, 2011 Rajvinder Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Dr.G.K.S.Taank, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner seeks direction for registering an FIR and also for recovery of agreement, which is stated to be forged. The property was statedly auctioned, which is under challenge in a civil revision. Primarily, it is a civil dispute. The prayer made in the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is wholly misconceived. The petitioner can invoke any alternative remedy in case there is any offence of forgery made out. No case for issuing any direction is made out in the present case. Rather this appears to be a case of misconceived approach on the part of the petitioner. Dismissed. October 31, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE