// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN 1. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6571/2008 Aas Mohammad S/o Shri Kamru Versus Court of Additional District Judge No.1, Deeg, District Bharatpur and Others AND 2. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6572/2008 Aas Mohammad S/o Shri Kamru Versus Court of Additional District Judge No.1, Deeg, District Bharatpur and Others Date of Order ::: 16.07.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Shailendra Khandelwal, Counsel for petitioner in both the writ petitions #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Both the writ petitions are directed against the common order dated 1st May, 2008 passed by the trial court whereby applications under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC read with Section 151 CPC for impleading applicants Sahun and Idris have been allowed and they have been impleaded as party defendant No.4 in respective suits. Plaintiff-petitioner filed a suit for // 2 // specific performance of an agreement in the trial court against the defendants wherein the applicants moved an application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. The trial court allowed the same vide order dated 1stMay, 2008, which is under challenge in this writ petition. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and also the reasons assigned by the court below. The trial court has recorded a finding that in the facts and circumstances of the present case the applicants are necessary party for effective decision of the case and allowed their application. I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in the said order so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in both the writ petitions and the same are accordingly dismissed in limine. This order decides two writ petitions, therefore, a copy of this order may be placed on the record of second writ petition. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//