CRA. 282-07 - 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 282 OF 2007 Carl Joseph Fernandes ...Applicant Vs. Paskin J. Xavier & Anr. ...Respondents *** Mr. Dewrat Dhankari i/b Mr. Ravi Thankarian, for the Applicant. Mr. Parag Sharma, for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. *** CORAM: V. M. KANADE J. DATE : MARCH 23, 2011 P.C. 1. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the parties have settled the dispute and are filing the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked “X” for the purpose of identification. The consent terms are signed by the applicant and respondents, and the advocate for the applicant. The respondents have appointed new advocate. However, since consent was not given by the earlier advocate of the respondents, his Vakalatnama is under objection. He is willing to sign the consent terms for the purpose of identifying respondent Nos. 1 & 2. He has accordingly signed the CRA. 282-07 - 2 - consent terms. 2. In paragraph 4 of the consent terms, the applicant has agreed to hand over possession of alternate possession, immediately after possession of the tenanted premises are handed over by the respondent/ defendants to the applicant. The applicant appearing in person undertakes to this Court that he will hand over possession of the alternate premises after the respondent/defendant hands over possession of the tenanted premises, described in Schedule 2 to the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have executed an agreement to the said effect which has been duly registered. Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of in the aforesaid terms. [ V. M. KANADE J.]