HIGHGOURTOFCHHATTISGARHArBU-ASPUR DIVIS1QNBENCH Coram : HON'BLESHRI RAJEEVGUPTA, &J.& HON'BLESHRISUNILKUMARSINHA.J. APPELLANTS: PETmONERS WritAiBBMlNo. 284 of 2007 1. Vijay BhEttiar' S/o Si.gnamal Bhatlya, aged about 45 ^ars, Proprietor—ShankerPan Bhandar ?and STR PCO, Near Raituay ^tation, Raigarh, Tehsil and tFictRaigarh(C.G.) Vipin Punjabi, Advocate, Sto Shri G.D;^'un|abf,cag«l46^B^;?R/o Bela( ai^SJG|lhi j@SiB|^ l!^^ Tehstt^ESffictRaigarh (C.©.) ^teraus RESPONDEWTS •^i 1y LState of Chhaltisgarh ftrough Sesretary, Home Department, Govt. ofT&G., E)^^^^^^B^^ Mantralaya,Raipur(C.G^ 2; DiiSrctoT General of< Police, Police HMd Quarter, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Inspe^or General of Police, BHaspur Division, Bilaspur(C.G.) 4. Supertntendent of Potice, Ragarh 5. Subhash Singh Thatair, Town Inspector, City K(rtwali, Ragarh, DistricrtRaigarh(G.G.) Bl VSe WritADDealUnderSeGtionZCtlofttredrtirttisaartllUalt G^rt!(ADi3iealtoI^^^BeheBllAdL2006 Present: Shri Uttam Partidey, l^amed counsel fbr the appellants.: ^ ....;;.. :'.is^.Y •^', ! : '•'7 1: • 'u Shn J.K. Gilda, leamai Adtttional Advocate ^enerati fbrrespondentsNo. 1 to4;l^ate. ORDER >tH (28mJune,200^ The following order of the Gourt was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri Uttam Pantfey, leamedcounset for the appetlarrts, in view of the dfcte of the Apex Court in the cases of Saluri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. & Others (2008 AIR SCW- 309»aml Dwine RetreatCentreVs.^t^ofKerala&OtherepOOT^K^ 1793), seeks permission to withdraw the writ appeal writh the tiberty pfayailing theotherremediesavailabletotheappeUantsin view of the above quoted cffcte of the Apex Court, beftye the appropriate Gourt. 2) Permissibn granted. 3) Withtheab<we!iberty,thewritappedis<|Bsmteed aswithdrawn. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- SunUKumarSinha Judge