IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18837 of 2010 OPEE BIND Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 1.6.2010 KHAN Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under sections 395 and 412 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has figured in the confessional statement of co-accused Ram Bilash @ Bilaity, Sikandar Bind, Rajan Kumar and Ravindra Kumar. He further submits that some of the co-accused namely Sikandar Singh @ Bind and Ravindra Kumar on whose confessional statement the name of the petitioner figured has been allowed bail by a bench of this court. Counsel for the State submits that from the order of the learned Sessions Judge it would appear that the petitioner has criminal antecedent recorded in paragraph 76 of the case diary. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after five months. (S.P.Singh,J)