8?--rA-----.--1.--—-—--^—--' @ ^<[[(rol t IN THE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No.S$3»4of2003 / BETWEEN Arjun Bohidar, aged about 51 year, s/o Late A. Bohidar, occupation: Clerk, Zifa Sahakari Krishi Aur Gramin \^kas Bank, Raigarh, r/o behind CityKotwali Raigarh, Tehsil & District: Raigarh (C.G.) PETITIONER AND 1. 2. 3. 4. The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Department of Co-operative, Mantralay, D.K.S. Building, Raipur, Tehsil and District Raipur (C.G.). The State of Madhya Pradesh, Through the Secretary Department of Co-operative, Mantralay, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, Tehsil and District Bhopal (M.P.) /' . .;*^»'' The Registrar, (\^>''^ Co-operative Societies Chhattisgarh, .c^L^*.*^ Labhandi^r^ear Agnculture Cdlege, Raipur, <^)^3:%>'*> Tehsil and District Raipur (C.G.). ..•• <^vs^^ The Registrar, ^ ^- ^ ^'' Co-operative Societies, Madhya Pradesh<'a<»'»\.-/< Bhopat, Tehsil and District Bhopat (M.P.). ' ^' ^^-g^ yhe General Manager (Chief Executive OfRcer), ^Jl'l^c?^. zila Sahakari Krishi Aur Gramin Vikas Bank, Raigarh, f^"~~"'\ ^Tehsil and District: Raigarh. • m^h^ I^ PETITION UNDER RESPONDENTS ^z" ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE |2::^£=.;€6NSTTTUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRFT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION ETC AND FOR APPROPRIATE FURTHER DIRECTIONS. F XI-HC-22 ^^ ^Si^Krl^, ^Tl1^4i<o, l®l<v11^y WW^T ^^|et% ^I^?T 1^^, ^.^.^\^ 'l^a?' 200 3??^T'^T ^NT^I^ $h^i<^ ^a ^IT^T'i^fT^R ^Sf^ 6-2-2004 Shri Shailenara SoniJ Shri p« uas, P.L. fcn| Heard both the c^iins^ The petitioaer has pxj 226/227 of the Constitutio^ petitioner is t hat he is a Barsk^ Raigarh^ The petiticj pay scale granfeed by the 51| of the Swvice Rules^ officecs of the Apex Bank cj enjoying the fruits of revll sinee fran the date when tri revised the pay scale of it| pay Commissdbon^ Learned Gounsel for tl petitiones: is entitled far i©being deprived illegallyl the peet&ioner may be res^ondent No<»3 to which thl has no objection^ Having heard the lear| allowled ^S14l<rt<?lvT ^w<vii "9 'fe^t tfa^K ^^P<R3H^T Res^ondents counsel for the petitionero the State/respondentSe ^. .. • ; l.eferrea this petitiai under ^rticle. or India^ The case ofthe clerk in theDistrict Co-operative ^ner is entitl^ for the revisea |h Pay commission as per Rale 4 3 and 4 who are the |f co-pperative Societies are |sed pay scale of 5th pay Coqiraission |e x eratwhile State Government s officers/enoloyees through 5th he petitionw submits that the the 5th Pay Commission, but he c, Counsel further submits that to make a representation to e learned counsel for resoondents ned counsel for the oarties and ^ XI-HC-22- ^^ '^{rai<ri<4, ^^4T^, ^rray 3ff^T 'HTHcrtT'%W^S'o"c'"^*'*'a"*'"'"B'"0""*'*^^ ^^ 'l^^s?' e, 3^1 ^I k^^n^T '^iN'^rfi^ Barve/ •\^ hciving regard to the facts the petitioner is allowed to respondent No»3 raising respondent No«3 will dedide petition^: wlthin a period of the representation and a of the petitioner shall pas< manner ^ With the direction disposed ofo parties ar e enti tled ^nd circumstances of the case, t<j> make a detailed representation within a perioa os 10 days tll his grievances^^id in turn the representation of the <^£ 30 days £rcm the date of receiot ^ter considering all the griefances reasoned order tn an objective af4resaid, the writ petition is 4>l^i<v(^vi ^H<v?f "9 ft^t if^T^R ^-3?f^R a??i^i ^or certifled copy of this order Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [^^{^