@ HIGH CGURT OF CHHA‘l‘TISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITJONERS WRIT §’ETIT]ON {S} N0. 3379 011007 . Ku. Suchita Khalkho: aged about 37 years: (Aiier man‘iage Smt. Suchita Mmj) D/o Kamaiius Khalkho, Assistani Teacher, Government Triba Boys Midle School, Farsabahar, Vikas Khanfa ~ Farsabahar, Distt. Eashpur, (CG; {Name appears at s1. No. 15 in apooiiitment order ciate‘d 3G. 1 1 .1994} 2. Ilisba Ekka (Aiier marriage Smt. IliSba Kujur) wife of Shri Romamis Kujui‘, aged about A. 38 G years, Assistant Teacher. Govermnent Tribai Girls Primary School ~ Banoli, Vikas Khami Farsabahar. District Jashpur (C.G.) (Name appears at s1. No. 31 in appointment enter cit. 30. 11.1994) U). . Ganesh Ram Yadav, son of Shri Meghaath Ram Yadav. aged a’eout 38 vears, Assistant Teacher, Tribal Primaty School ‘ Golidih, Vikas Khand T‘rat‘sabanar, 1 Y‘ uistt. Jashpur (Cm) I‘ {Name Y appears at s1. Not 33 in appointment order dt, 30” 1 1.1994) 4. Smt. Shaoti Hausra, aged a’oout 47 years, Wife of Shri Johazx Haosra. Assistant Teacher — Government Tribal Primary Schoo} ~ Uparkachhar, Vikas Khand Farsabahar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (Name appears at sl. No. 74 iii appointment outer cit. 3G. 1 1.1994) 5. Udit Ram Chauhan, aged about 38 years. son of Mansevak Ram Chauhaii, Assistant Teacher, Tribal Girls Primary School ~ Sakara. Tahsil Farsabahar Distt. Jashpur (CG) (Name appears at sl. No. 78 in appointmertt order dt. 30. 1 l.l994) 6. Ku. Tarsisiya Minj (After mairiage Tarisisiya Tirky) wife of Prafuil Tirky, aged about 37 years, Assistant Teacher, Tribal Giris Primary School — (Putrishala) — Tapara, Vikas Khand Farsabahar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (Name appears at s1. No. 87 in appointment order cit. 30.11.1994) l\ Laxman Kumar Shaima, aged about 38 years, son of Rampravesh Kumar Shanna, Assistant Teacher, Govemmeiit Primary School, Purani Basti Patthalgaon, Distt. Jashpur (CG) (Name appears at s}. Nu 113 iii appoiiitmeiit order dt. 3G. l 1.1994) 8. Gariesh Kumar Mandal, aged about 42 years, son of Sliri Rashik Mario-ad, Assistant Teacher, Government Tribal Girls Primary School — Baluabahar, Vikas Khand Farsabahar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (Name appears at s1. No. 118 in appointment order dt. 30.11.1994) 9‘ Kumari Mariyum Kindo (After marriage — Smt. Mariyum Toppo) Wife ofAleXius Toppo, aged about 37 years, Assistant Teacher, Government ~ Girls @ Tribal School a Bootkachhar. Vikas Khand Farsabahar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (Name appears at sl. No. 120 in appointment order dt. 30. 1 1.1994) 10. Smt. Neel Kusum Toppo, D/o. Shri Antom's Toppo, aged about 41 years: Assistant Teacher. Government Girls Tribal Primary Schooi ~ Joranda Jhariya, Vikas Khand Famabahan Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (Name appears at s1. No. 124 in appointmem order dt. 30.1 1.1994) 11.}{umari Urseh Ekka (After marriage Ursela Toppo) Wife of Shri Athnas Toppo, aged about 38 years, Assistaiat Teacher, Government Primary School Purani Basti — Patthalgaon, Distt‘. Jashpur (CG) (Name appears at s1. No. 133 in appointment order (it. 30.1 1.1994) ilRomanus Kujur, son of Shri Albins Kujur, aged about 37 years, Assistant Teacher. Government Giris Primary School — Jam-munda, Vikas Khand Farsabahar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (Name appears at s1. No. 139 in appoimment order dt. 39. l 1 . 1994) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh. through — Secretary. Department of Tribal WeEare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Assistant Commissioner, Deptt. Of- Tribal Welfare. District Jashpur (CG) 3. Block Education Officer e Block ~ Farsabahar, Distt. Jashpur (co) 4. Block Education 0&icer — Block ~ Patthalgaoo, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Single Beiich i Eimi’ble Justice Slni Satisli K. Amiilmtrl. Present: RES?ONDENTS // ’w Shri ANBhakta, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri ArVind Dubey, Pailel Lawyer for the State/responderits. ORDER (Passed on 20m day of June, 2007) The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion ofprobation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same as to that of in W.P. No. @ 5473/2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sharma & another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others), which was allowed Vide order dated 09.10.2006. In View of the above-stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties. the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit