1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 208 /2011 (Naushad Ahmad Abdul Jameel vs. State of Maharashtra and others ) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : D.D.SINHA & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ DATED : 21st January, 2011. Heard Mr A.H. Jamal, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr Nitin Sambre, learned Govt. Pleader for respondent no.1 and Mr M P Badar, for respondents 2 and 3. This Writ petition is direction against the order dated 14.9.2010 passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal whereby the Original Application of the petitioner came to be rejected. Considered the contentions canvassed by the respective counsel. Perused the order impugned. The following facts are not in dispute : that the post of Clerk-cum-Typist at the relevant time, was reserved for partially sighted candidate, while the minimum disability required was 40 %. The petitioner neither falls within the category of partially sighted nor has a disability of minimum 40%. In that view of the matter, the findings recorded by the Tribunal is just and proper. Writ Petition is dismissed. However, the issue as 2 regards validity of the Government Resolution dated 12.7.2004 is kept open. JUDGE JUDGE sahare