IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 7186 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 7.12.2009. Taj Barman and others ....Petitioners Versus Sanjay Kumar and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Satinder Khanna, Advocate for the petitioners. RAJESH BINDAL J. **** Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated August 6, 2007 passed by the learned Court below. Initially the father of the petitioner filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction regarding the property in dispute on December 9, 1999. The application for amendment seeking possession thereof was filed on November 21, 2006 claiming that during the pendency of the suit, the possession of the property was taken forcibly by the respondents/defendants. However, no date on which the possession was allegedly taken during pendency of the suit has been mentioned either in the application or could be pointed out at the time of hearing in the Court. It is also not in dispute that the present petition challenging the order has been filed more than two years after the passing of the order. Considering the aforesaid fact, I do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order whereby the application for amendment has been dismissed. Dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 7.12.2009 JUDGE Reema