[IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PEnTION (S) No. 3362 of2007 PETITIONERS te 1. Arun Kumar Mishra Age about 38 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Sliri Jokbu Rani MisSua Primary School Farsapara, . Block-Bastar, Distt. Jagdalpur (C.G.) 2. VishwaNath Joshi Age about 38 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Sliri Jeevnatli Joslii Prmiary School telpfauty, Bakavand, Distt. Jagdalpur (C.G.) 3. Munna Rain Kunjam Age about 38 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Late Sliri Manau Ram Middle School Kuneai-pal Block - Bastar, Distt. - Jagdalpiir(C.G.) 4. Bhim Ram Nag Age about 41 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Dhaiii Raiti Nag Primary School Khadka (Madhota) Block-Bastar, Distt. - Jagdalpur(C.G.) 5. Fotku Ram Baghel Age about 41 year, Asstt. Teacher, S/o Sliri Mousa Rain Primaiy School Lamkair Block-Bastar, Distt. - Jagdalpur (C.G.) 6. Shankar Ram Kashyap Age about 40 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Dharmu Ram Primaiy Scliool Bodara Block-Bastar, Distt. - Jagdalpur (C.G.) 7. Jeevan Lal Sahu Age about 39 year, Asstt. Teacher S.'o Sliri Ramji La! Sahu Middle School Rotama Block-Bastar, Distt. - Jagdalpur (C.G.) 8. Jeevrakliaii Kosma Age about 42 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Sukha Ram Kosma Primary ichool Block-Bastar, Distt. - Jagdalpur (C.G.) 9. Smt. Jasho Baghel Age about 39 year, Asstt. Teaeher W/'o Sliri FotaJai Ram Bagliel Priiiiaiy School Dengguda, Jhartarai Block-Bastar, Distt. - Jagdalpur (C.G.) 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Tribal Welfare Departmeat & Edueation Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Astt. Commissionei,.Jagdalpur Distt. - Jagdalpur (C.G.) 3. District Education Qfficer Jaadaipur Distt. Jagdalpur(C.G.) 4. BIock Education Ofiicer, Bastar. Distt. - Jagdalpur (C.G.) 5. Treasure, Accounts & Pension Jagdalpur Distt. - Jagdalpur (C.G.) ~7- WRn PETITION UNDER AR1ICLE 226 OF THE CONST]TUnON_OF INDIA Smgle Bench : Hon'blc Justtce Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. Present: Sfari Somkant Vemia, Advocate for the oetitioners. Slici Y.S.Tliakur, Govt. Advocate fortlic State/respondeats. (Passed on 20m day of Juae, 2007) The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.fthe date ofmitial appointment or from fhe date ofcompletion ofprobation period. Leamed counsel appeai-ing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same as to that ofin W.P.fS) No. 6108 of 2006 (Rajlaunari W/o M.K.Dffliwar Vs. The State Govennnent of Chhattissarh & Others), which was allowed vide order dated08.il.2006. In view ofthe above-stated submissions made by leamed counsel for fhe parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ainit y