IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31682 of 2008 PRADEEP SINGH … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri Binod Kumar For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta, APP ----------- 6. 23.12.2008 Heard. The case is under Sections 392 of the Indian of the Indian penal Code and the petitioner is in custody since 5.5.2008. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the informant stated that his companion Ashok Yadav had identified the petitioner and co- accused Rabish Kumar. The statement of Ashok Yadav is recorded in paragraph 9 of the case diary and he does not name anybody. One Phulena Yadav had stated in paragraph 40 of the supplementary case diary along with another witness Ganga Yadav in paragraph 41 of the case diary that the informant was telling them that he had identified the present petitioner Pradeep Singh. Thus, the case appears of single identification which is not supported by the companion of the informant. 2 The defence is of being opposed to the informant who was the Mukhiya the petitioner has been falsely implicated. Let the petitioner, Pradeep Singh be released on his furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in Sahebpur Kamal P.S.Case No. 6 of 2007. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)