IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.119 of 2007 Hari Nath Pandit Versus State Of Bihar with MJC No.120 of 2007 Ajay Kumar Singh Versus State Of Bihar & Anr with MJC No.121 of 2007 Pradeep Kumar Bharti Versus State Of Bihar & Anr with MJC No.122 of 2007 Shyam Sunder Tiwary Versus State Of Bihar & Anr with MJC No.123 of 2007 Brajesh Kumar Versus State Of Bihar ----------- 21. 10.08.2011 Supplementary Affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, informing the Court that the District Magistrate, Sheohar had filed Letters Patent Appeal No. 1105, 561, 671, 617, 648 of 2011, challenging the order, dated 15.09.2010, whereby the Civil Review Application filed by the District Magistrate, Sheohar had been dismissed and opportunity was given to the District Magistrate, Sheohar to advertise remaining vacancies, considering cases of the petitioner and similarly situated persons for appointment in the 2 light of 1987 Rules, as well as letter no. 415, dated 06.04.1998. Six months’ time was allowed to the District Magistrate, Sheohar for filling up vacancies and to submit compliance report before the Court. Subsequent to that on 30.03.2011, the District Magistrate, Sheohar filed Supplementary Show-cause, praying for extension of time in view of ensuing election and also that he has approached the Commissioner for roster clearance and he is inclined to advertise 17 vacant post of VLW. Assurance and undertaking was given by the District Magistrate that by 27th of July, 2011 all compliance will be made. After giving such undertaking before this Court on affidavit, subsequently, he filed LPAs, in view of the order passed by the Division Bench. I do not want to proceed with this Contempt Application. It is being dismissed. Petitioners have liberty to move before the appropriate forum for redressal of their grievance. SKM (Mridula Mishra, J.)