1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Amk REVIEW PETITION NO. 123 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1054 OF 2010 Smt. Lily Augustine Rodrigues .. Petitioner Vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-op. Hsg. Society Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. J. S. Kapre along Smt. Jyothi Karanthi i/b Smt. B. P. Jakhade for the Petitioner. Smt. Jahan Ara Sarkhot with D. D. Raut for Resp. No.1. CORAM : MRS. R. S. DALVI, J. DATE : 5th May, 2010. P.C. 1. The Petitioner has applied for review of my order dated 15th February, 2010 in the above Writ Petition. The structure of the Petitioner has been demolished. The Review Petition has become infructuous on that score itself. 2. However the Petitioner claims that she is entitled to alternate accommodation since her structure is demolished as per G.R. dated 10th October, 2002 annexed at ‘Exh.M’ to the Petition. The G. R. mentions about the alternate accommodation to occupants of hutments in a slum. The Petitioner has not shown her occupation in a hut which is in a slum. No notification of the slum is produced. The Petitioner has relied upon the list of occupants 2 separately annexed to this Petition. It is not known of which document the list forms the part. The list only shows the hutment occupants. The list does not show any slum in which the hutments are situate. 3. In fact the Petitioner’s own case is that she is occupant in a slum in the MHADA colony. The MHADA colony premises cannot be a slum. Hence her case for alternate accommodation cannot be considered. Consequently there is no merit in the Review Petition. 4. The Review Petition is dismissed. (R. S. DALVI, J.)