IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7790 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO.7790 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO.7790 OF 2003 Suchita J.Pille @ Suchita Dattaram Nalla .. Petitioner V/s State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.R.K.Mendadkar for the Petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP for Respondent No.1 & 3. Mr.Milind Sathe with Mr.Yadav for Res.No.2. CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : 22.12.2004. DATE : 22.12.2004. DATE : 22.12.2004. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner categorically states that the Petitioner is not challenging the order dated 30.3.2002 whereby the Petitioner’s caste claim as "Mannerwarlu" Scheduled Tribe was invalidated by the Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims, Konkan Division, Thane. However, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner has applied for the caste certificate as if he is belonging to "Telgu Phulmali". The learned Counsel for Respondent No.2 states that for a period of four months from today, the Respondent No.2 will not act on the show cause notice issued to the Petitioner. Petition stands disposed of. .....