Civil Revision No.322 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.322 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 18, 2011 Rajbir Singh .....Petitioner v. Bijender Singh and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) C.M.No.1326-CII of 2011 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Civil Revision No.322 of 2011 The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside order dated 18.12.2010, passed by learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Panipat, vide which application of the petitioner for leading additional evidence has been dismissed. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned order passed by learned trial Court. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that learned trial Court has dismissed the application for additional evidence filed by petitioner-defendant without passing a speaking order and without discussing the averments made by him in the application that he intends to tender certified copies of revenue record, which are necessary for adjudication of controversy between the parties. Perusal of the impugned order passed by learned trial Court shows that the same has been dismissed merely on the ground that earlier as well some applications were filed by the petitioner-plaintiff, which were dismissed. Civil Revision No.322 of 2011 (O&M) -2- There is force in the argument of learned counsel for the petitioner. Hence, impugned order is set aside. Learned trial Court is directed to decide the application of the petitioner-defendant for additional evidence afresh by passing a speaking order. Disposed of accordingly. 18.1.2011 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge