1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Writ Petition No. 1249 of 2009 . Pramila Virendrakumar Agrawal .. Petitioner v/s. Union of India & Another ..Respondents Mr.A.K.Singh for the Petitioner. Mrs.P.H.Kantharia with Mr.M.S.Bharadwaj for the Respondent Nos.1 and 3 Mr.P.A.Pol PP for the State, Respondent No.2 CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED : 30th November, 2009 P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. Singh, the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Bharadwaj appears for the CBI i.e. the respondent nos.1 and 3. Shri Adsule appears for respondent No.2. 2. The petitioner prays for directions to bifurcate the assets which are subject matter of R.C.Case No.49(A) of 2007 and R.C.Case No.30(A) of 2007 and return the assets which belong to her by retaining the assets which 2 belong to her husband Shri V.K.Agrawal. 2. We are informed that the petitioner as well as her husband, have been arrested and the petitioner had made an application for similar reliefs before the Competent Court, i.e. the Special Court (CBI at Mumbai) and her application came to be rejected. 3. The petitioner has a separate remedy to challenge the order passed by the Special Court, if she so desires. We do not find any reason to entertain this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. Hence the petition is rejected with liberty as is available in law. [R.Y.GANOO, J.] [B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.]