IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-7124 of 2008 Date of decision : 15.4.2009 Vidya Devi and others … Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr.Justice K.C.Puri Present :- Mrs.Sharmila Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.A.K.Jindal, AAG, Haryana. Mr.Pankaj Bali, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 11. K.C.Puri, J. (Oral) Reply on behalf of respondents Nos.1, to 3 has been filed in Court. The same is taken on record. Copy of the same has been supplied to the opposite counsel. Mr.Pankaj Bali, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents No.4 to 11 and seeks time to file reply. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated at the bar that the petitioner would be satisfied in case directions are given to the Superintendent of Police, Karnal to consider and decide the representation Annexure P-8 submitted by the petitioner. The Superintendent of Police, Karnal is directed to decide the representation Annexure P-8 submitted by the petitioner keeping in view the threats perception to the petitioner within two months from the receipt of the copy of the order. Petition stands disposed of. [ K.C.Puri ] Judge 15.04.2009 sd