1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.APPA 232 OF 2010. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS SUKHDEO GOVINDRAO SAWARKAR AND ANOTHER ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri S. S. Doifode, Advocate for the applicant. Coram : A.H. JOSHI, J. Date : 07th JUNE, 2010. 1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 60 days caused in filing the appeal against the acquittal. 2. The accused was tried for the offence punishable under Sections 7 and 13 (1) (d) r/w Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. 3. The learned Special Judge has discussed the evidence and found that the story of the prosecution about the demand and acceptance not duly proved, apart that whatever was proved was destroyed by defence witnesses. 4. The learned Special Judge, therefore, found that it cannot be said that the prosecution has proved 2 the case beyond reasonable doubt. The evidence has been duly discussed and appreciated. 5. In the result, application and appeal do not have any merit and hence application and appeal are rejected. Judge |mule|