IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25538 of 2008 RUPAN RANA & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21.7.2008. Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. Counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in the name of petitioner no.1. It has been submitted that petitioner no.1 is father-in-law and petitioner no.2 is brother-in-law of the deceased who are alleged to have killer her for demand of dowry. Considering the allegations in the F.I.R. and the post mortem report as mentioned in the impugned order of the Sessions Judge, prayer for anticipatory on behalf of the petitioners is rejected. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J)