IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2010 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH MFA.CROSS OBJECTION NO.10 OF 2010 BETWEEN I. VEENAMMA W/O.LATE NARASIMHAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 2. DNNAYANA D/O.LATE NARASIMHAPPA AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, 3. D N MANJUNATH S/O LATE NARASIMHAPPA AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS, 4. RAMAPPA t— /O LATE NARASIMHAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, ALL ARE R/A DWARASANDRA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, SRINIVASPURA TALUK APPELLANT NO2 & 3 REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN THE MOTHER AND FIRST APPELLANT. . . * (By Sri. PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY H, ADVOCATE) AND I. P V SRINIVASAREDDY 5/0 PVENKATASWAMY ( 4 1 Hi!t (r’ 1 Kriitk F4nl’t )} ( f MFA. Crob.No.l0/l0 AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. R/O PATHAPALLI, KASABA HOBLI, SRINIVASPUR TALUK 2. S.R.MANJUNATHAREDDY S/0 S.V.RAMAKRISHNAREDDY AGED 40 YEARS, R/0 SATHANDLAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, SRINIVASPUR TALUK. 3. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD P.B.NO.24, 1ST FLOOR, BAGALUR MANSION, DODDAPET, KOLAR ... RESPONDENTS THIS MFA.CROB IN MFA.NO.3182/2009 FILED U/O 41 RULE 22 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:27.11.2008 PASSED IN MVC NO.52/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) AND JMFC, MACT, CHINTAMANI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. This Miscellaneous First Appeal Cross Objection is coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following: ORDER Needful in two weeks failing which the cross objection.s stand dismissed. j ) I <if 1< MFA. CrobNo 10/10 iQIE Sd/ JUDGE Vide Order dated:01/ 07 / 2010 Office objectjo 5 are not complied with. Hence appe& stands dismissed T By: KTY RBy: 1 L C ByrØ I J / (D. ARtJIj KUMARI) ( iur raK rJflre 1(t