IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.1034 of 2010. Date of decision:29.3.2010 Usha Devi ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B,Misra, Judge. For the Petitioner: Mr.Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.R.K.Sharma, Sr. Addl. AG with Mr.J.K.Verma, Dy.A.G., for respondents No.1 to 3. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.(Oral) Challenges on Annexure P-5 proceedings of the Committee constituted to enquire into the complaints against the recruitment of PTA Teachers. According to the petitioner, inquiry, if any, in respect of complaints with regard to the appointment of teachers appointed prior to the introduction of the new guidelines has to be done in accordance with the then existing guidelines. That principle has been settled by this Court in various judgments including CWP No.930 of 2010, therefore, we quash Annexure P-5 with a direction to the Committee concerned to conduct appropriate inquiry in respect of the complaint pertaining to the appointment in accordance with the guidelines existed at the time of the engagement of the petitioner. However, it is made clear that this judgment itself will not confer any right on the petitioner to be re-admitted to duty. That question would arise only depending on the outcome of the inquiry as above. However, it is made clear that it will be open to the PTA to engage the services of the petitioner, subject to the outcome of the inquiry as above. Petition stands disposed of. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 29, 2010(s/sl) ( Justice R.B. Misra ), Judge