@ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 60mm: HOWELE $HR§ R‘LWEEV GUPTA Cal. HON’BLE 331R! RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR,J Appeal under $ection 173 of the Mater Vehicies Aet ORDER (Th My, 2m; The foilowing order of the” Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellant. MA No.330 of 2mm Appeliant Prem Prasad Tiwari, aaed 35 vears s/o C%aimant Tejendra \rasad Ti'E'ari, dccupétion Mate in F’WD Resident of Kelkar Para, Raipur, Tah & Distt Raipur (CG Versus ReSnodnents 1 ‘Toranlai Mirdha, aged 35 years, S/o Nan‘appimants Baiiram Mirdha, Occupation — R€der of Motor Cycle, Rio Kusnali, ‘Thana Bagbahara, Tah & District Mahasamund (CG) 2 Kaiiash Ram Bhagat, S/o Sonuram Bhagat, Occupaticn — Motor Cyc€e Owner, R/o through SN Ram Bhagat Naib TahsHdar, Sarangarh, Distt Raigarh (CG) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeai for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. 2) ”\ / \VM w 1;“ Sd/— / ‘ VL‘R_N.chandrakar Chief Justice / ) "' “dge