HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH^ BJLA8PUR M.C.C.74of2007 APPLICANTS SiESPONDBWT 1. The State of Chhattisgarh flirougli tiie Secretaiy, Department of Techuical Education and Manpower Plaimmg, DKS BuUding, Mantralaya, Raipur(CG) 2. Dtrector, Dtrectorate of Employment and Tramiiig, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, 3. Jotnt Dtrector, Dit'ectorate of Eiaployxaent aad Traiamg, Chhattisgarh, Raipur. 4. Joiat Director(Enquiiy Officer), TTi 7/one, Bilaspur(CG). VERSUS M.F.Ansan aged about 41 yeai's, s/o Late Shri M, H,Ansaii, preseutiy posted as Principal(Grade-II), Industorial Tramuig Institute, Jagadalpur, District- Bastar(CG). Appearax&ce: Shri G,K,Beriwal, Dy. Advocate Gcucral for thc State/ applicants. ORAL ORDER (16.03.2007) 8UNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. By way of this Misc. Civil Case, the State and the concenied authorities of the State have pi-ayed for extension of tijae^ho^t 2 years w.e.f. 1.10.2005 to compty with the oMer dated 20.1.2005, passed by this Coiirt,s — ^- M.C.C.74/2007 Record penised, It appears that on 20.1.2005, this Coiirt had directed in W.P.No.2689/2004 that the pefitiioner shall file a copy of orier dated 20,1,2005 alongwith the copy of writ petitiou No. 2689/2004 before the di<<'lip1ina5y/enqinTy officer within a period of 15 days fron-i the saxl date ancl on siich dociiments being filerl, the said aiithority shall dispose of the depai'tme-otaJI enqiiiry proceeding of the petitioiier as earty as po^sihle preferably wifliin a period ofeight months from the said date ofprocliiction of the order. A penisal of the earlier order woiild show thst the deparfcmental enqziiiy was initiated against tlie petitioner on 9.6.2000 and the petitioner had filed his reply on 14.7.2000 (Annexiire P-3 in the writ petitjoD)and from the said date, the enqiiiiy was pending and looking to the ahove sitiiation, in a petitioni filed for quasliment of tTie enqiiiiy, tbe Rfoi'esaid order was passed hy this C/oiirt. Tn view of the above^ it appears that the petitioners ere unneces^arily delaymg the enqiiiry and now, they have come to this C/oiirt by filing this application on 12,2.2007 that 2 years tinie Av- ^e-riO^ o^- /^— w.e.f, 1.10.2005 ie. the date of completioB oftlie^earlier oi-der, be given to them. I do not find any reason to exteDd the period in the prevailing facts and circiimstances ofthe case. Thi$»application for extension oftiiiiie is dismissed. The M.C.C. stands finalty disposed of, Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge sunita