1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2116 OF 2009 Dattatraya s/o Rambhau Kadam, Age: 45 years, Occ: Labour, R/o. Pimpalner, Tq. & District Beed. .. Petitioner Versus Balasaheb s/o Raghunath Jogdand, Age: 45 years, Occ: Agri., R/o. Pimpalner, Tal. and District Beed & Ors. .. Respondents ... Mr. S.J. Salunke, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. V.D. Patnoorkar, Advocate for Resp.No.1. Mr. N.H.Borade, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos. 2 and 3. ... CORAM : K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 28TH AUGUST, 2009. PER COURT : 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, the matter is taken up for final hearing at admission stage. 2 2. By this petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 12-12-2008 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad in Appeal/CR/304/2008 under Section 14(J) and 16(2) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. By this order, the Additional Commissioner refused to stay the operation and implementation of order dated 29-09-2008 passed by the Additional Collector, Beed. 3. Both the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as respondents agreed that if the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad direct to decide Appeal/CR/304/2008 within six weeks, then they have no objection, if interim relief granted by this Court on 13-04-2009 to continue till disposal of the appeal. 3 4. Considering these facts, by consent of both the parties, the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad is directed to decide Appeal/CR/304/2008 within six weeks from the receipt of copy of this order. Interim relief granted by this Court on 13th April 2009 (Coram : B.R. Gavai, J.) to continue till the hearing and final disposal of Appeal No. 304/2008. 5. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. Rule made absolute in above terms. . Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order. [ K.K. TATED, J.] sut/AUG09/wp2116.09