THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 22429 of 1998 Dated 5th July 2006 Between: P.V.G.Krishnam Raju S/o. Narasimha Raju …Petitioner and The District Collector, Srikakulam District & others …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 22429 of 1998 O R D E R: This writ petition was filed, with an allegation that respondents 1 to 3 are not taking action for smooth conducting of the affairs of the 4th respondent society. The petitioner states that he was functioning as In-charge Business Manager of 4th respondent society, at the relevant point of time, and prayed for a declaration that the action of the respondents 1 to 3, in contemplating to remove him from the said position, is illegal and arbitrary. On 13.8.1998, while issuing notice before admission, this court observed that any appointment that may be made in the mean while, shall be subject to further orders. The writ petition was admitted on 24.12.1998. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. Even according to the averments in the affidavit, there was no definite grievance or cause of action for the petitioner. The so-called removal was in contemplation. It is not known as to what developments have taken place, in the mean while. It is difficult to imagine that the same state of affairs continued, for the past 8 years. If the petitioner had suffered any detriment in the meanwhile, he has to initiate fresh proceedings, in accordance with law. Either way, the cause in this writ petition does not survive. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his remedies, if the situation warrants. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ 5th July 2007 PAN