IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 18TH JULY 2008 / 27TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 21702 of 2008(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- MAJOR P.K.KRISHNAKUMAR (RTD) 37/2895, PONOTH ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI - 17. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.SAJI SMT.P.DEEPTHI RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF KOCHI, ERNAKULAM - 11. 3. THE CHIEF TOWN PLANNER, CORPORATION OF KOCHI, ERNAKULAM - 11. 4. THE SECRETARY, GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KADAVANTHRA, KOCHI - 20. 5. M/S.SIEKEN PROPERTY DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, EAST INDIA GROUP OF COMPANIES, OPP: KOCHI SHIPYARD, M.G.ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 15. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA SRI.S.RAMESH BABU, SC, COCHIN CORPORATION SRI.P.R.RAMACHANDRAMENON THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 21702 OF 2008 H ==================== Dated this the 18th day of July, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that he has filed Ext.P1 complaint before the 2nd respondent making allegations in the context of the construction undertaken by the 5th respondent. In this writ petition, the complaint is that there has not been any action on the side of the 2nd respondent. 2. I heard the counsel for the petitioner, standing counsel for the 2nd respondent as also the standing counsel for the 4th respondent. 3. Having regard to the grievance of the writ petitioner as above and in the nature of the order that I propose to pass, I do not think it necessary to issue notice to the 5th respondent. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of without expressing anything on the merits of the allegations raised by the petitioner and directing that if Ext.P1 has been received and is pending before the 2nd respondent, the said respondent shall enquire into the matter with notice WPC 21702/08 :2 : to the 5th respondent. It is directed that if in the enquiry so conducted, it is found that there is any substance in what the petitioner is complaining, appropriate consequential action shall be taken by the 2nd respondent. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp