T?-; HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR i W.P.(S) No. 4550 of 2005 Petjtioner Versus Respondent 1. 2. 3. Vi|ay Kumar Garg, S/o Late Shri Chhotelal Garg, aged about 5 years, Lower Dsvlsson Teacher, R.D. Tiwan, SVIfddte Schoo! -A, Amapara, Rajpur, Resident of H.No. 15/995, Jawaher Nsgsr Wsrd, Ram Ssger Psra, Raipur (Chhattlsgarh) State of Chhattisgsrh, through the Secretary, Schoot Edycanon DepartmeRt. D. K. S. Bhawan. Ra'ipur (Chhattisgarh). The Di'rector of Pubtic (nsfruction (D.P.I.) State of ChhatSisgarh, Pension Bada. Raipur (Chh.) Dsstrict Educafion OfRcer, Ralpur, Pension Bada, Raipur (Chhaitisgarh) Shri Manoj Kumar Dubey, Advocate for the petiftoner. Shri V. V. S. Murthy, Deputy Advocate General w'sth Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt. Advocats for the respondente ORDl.R (Passed on fhis 30th day of March, 2007) The fojlowjng orcter of She Court js passed by SatSsh K. Agnihotrs, J. 1. The pstjtloner has fSSed this petitlon chalSenging the transfer order dated 17.7.2001. By virtue of the jnterim stay granted by the Madhya Pradesh AcSministrativs TrSbunaS at Raipur the pet'stloner is continuing 3t the origjnaS pSace ofpostjng. 2. Be that as 11 may, wlth ths passage of time this pstitjon has bscome infructuous as period of transfer is not applicable forever. At thSs point of time there Js no questlon to sxamjne the vaijdity of the transfer order. Hcwever, the rsspondents are st SJberfy to pass appropriate orders kseping in vlew the public interest and admlnistratlve exigen<y, •vvlthout Insis^ng on compliance of the impusned transfer order. 3. Sn vlew of ths abovs, this pe^tion stands disposed of. No order as {o costs. Thakur Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge