1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 5164/2009 Komal Kumar Vs. Union of India & Ors. Date of Order :: 12.07.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Narpat Singh, for the petitioner/s. ... This petition for writ was presented on 4.9.2008. Certain defects were pointed out by the Registry and those were removed on 18.5.2009. The matter came up for admission before the Court on 25.5.2009 but the same was adjourned as none was present to pursue the matter. Then again on 6.1.2010 the matter was adjourned for a period of two weeks at the instance of the petitioner. Now after a lapse of two years from the date of filing, this matter is again before the Court for admission. Be that as it may, the grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents are creating new legislative constituencies of Kapasan and Rashmi and that is kept reserved for Scheduled Caste category. As per the petitioner such reservation is illegal in view of the fact that the General Category people shall be having no opportunity to get themselves elected for legislative assembly. It is also urged that earlier too the part of the constituency was under a legislative segment which was reserved for Scheduled Caste category. At the threshold I consider it appropriate to mention that the 2 legislative constituencies of Kapasan and Rashmi have already been created and elections to those have also been held long back. As such, the relief claimed for has become infructuous. Beside that the petition in itself is quite vague. No details are given to establish the delimitation made is not proper or in any way affecting any legal right of the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition for writ is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal '