8 l.»sai"2^ai i !,3\s. DefGndsi1! WRJT PETITION ( 227J No. 5121 Gf 2011 Dhit-aj Kuraar Paadit S/o Late Qi-t^ ni-t^T "^ r<u"n.-i"-i o^^r4^+ l-?i-lll 1 ^t 1 ili^tti 1 V^'JLI.CU.lLt-l fl i~cU.iu.it. VERSUS RESPO^DENTS PIaintifls 2. aged about years, R/o House No. 630, Smdhiya Nagar, Titurdih, Durg, District Durg (CG). Dhiman Kuniar Pandit S/o Late Shri Dhiresh Chaudra Paadit, aged about years, R/o House No. 630, Siadhiya Nagar, Titurdih, Duig, District Durg (CG), Mohd. Ali S/o Late Babu Bhai Mistri, R/o Takiyapara, Durg, DistrictDui^(CG). WRET PETITION UNDBR ARTICLB 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIOSS OF (SS :Hon'Me Mr. T.P.Saarma, J.) Present:- Shri Arvind Sinha, Advocate tbr the petitioner. Respondents not noticed. ORDER ^:^<1£^^ |»-s--" 2. 3. (Passedon 05/09/2011) By fhis petition under Article 227 of the Coastitution of India petitioner has chaUenged the legaUty aad propriety of the order dated 8/7/2011 passed by 8th Civil Judge Class-2, Durg (C.G.) m Case No. 2A/08 whereby 8th Civil Judge Class-2, Durg (C.G.) has disuussed ttie appUcation filed uader Order7 Rule 11 offh.e Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Shri Arvind Siaha, Advocate for the petitioner is heard. Order unpugned, copy of the plauit, copy of fhe appUcation and copy ofother docunients perused. Considering fhe relief claimed by the respondents that fhey have clauned relief for pennanent uijunction on the ground of their previous possession, I do not find any iUegaiity in disinissing such applic^tion. Consequenfly, petition is Uable to be disniissed aud is hereby disinissed at fhe stage ofinotion itself. No order as to costs. I.A. No. 01 is also disnussed. H° Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge