Vivek Goyal, aged about 22 years son of Shri ‘Shyam Sunder Goyal, resid'ent of Sadar Bazar. Raipur (CG) (m year student of MBBs. CIMS). Ku. Anushree Sehgal, aged about 23 years. daughter of Shri Rakesh Sehgal, (IN year student of MBBS, CIMS), Bilaspur (CG). Divesh Kumar Saini, aged about 22 years, son of Shri Mahendra Kumar Saini, resident of Qr.No.409, Sector Type C, BALCO Township, Korba, District Korba (CG) (ill year student of MBBS, CIMS). Arvind Shroff, aged about 22 years. son of Shri Sukharam Prasad Shroff, (ill year student of MBBS, CIMS). Biiaspur (CG). Vaibhav Kant Baderiya. aged about 22 years, son of Shri Krishna Chandra Baderiya. resident of Schooipara, Main Road, Baikunthpur, District Korea (CG), (ill year student of MBBS‘ CIMS). 'Pavan Kumar Sisodia, aged about 22 years, son of Shri A.K. $isodia, resident of 56. Nakut Colony, Rampur, Jabalpur (MP), (ill year student of MBBS, CIMS). Digvijay Sinah. aged about 22 years. son of Shri Deooharan Singh, resident of Kasturba Nagar, 14. Jarhabhatha, District Bilapsur (CG). (ill year student of MBBS, CIMS). Ku. Bharti Patel, aged about 22 years. son of shri Nehru Lal Patel, student of ill year MBBS. CIMS, Biiaspur (CG). Balram Prasad Jaiswal, aged about 22 - years, son of Shri Vishnu Prasad (ill year student of MBBS, CIMS). allaspur. Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Department of Health and Family Welfare/Higher Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG). Guru Ghasidas University. through its Registrar. University Campus, Koni, District Bilaspur (CG). RESPONDENTS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPQR WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 27 OF 2007 1. 3. Chhattisgarh Institute of Medica: Science, through ,— its Dean, Pratap Chowk, Bilaspur (CG). (Writ petition under Asticle 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Mr. KR. Nair, counselfor the petitionero. Mr. A.s. Kachhawaha. Dy. Adv. Genera! forthe State. Mr. Ashish Shrivastava. counsel for the respondent No.2. ' 6&L Genet? (Passed on this 2" February, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. on instructions. seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition on the ground that the same has become infructuous, to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection. 2) lt is ordered. as prayed for. 3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4) Consequently, M.(W).P.No.75/2007 stands disposed of. ,r ‘i Sdl— I ‘. Satish K. Agnihotn to , .“Judge