Civil Revision No.1055 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.1055 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision:-July 22,2009 Manjit Kaur ....Petitioner Versus Baldev Singh and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reports or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported to the Digest? Present: Shri Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri B.R.Mahajan, Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri H.S.Jaswal, Advocate for respondent Nos.6 and 7. ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral): The petitioner is aggrieved at the order dated 9.12.2008 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Amritsar whereby she has been directed to place on record the original power of attorney dated 13.8.2003. The petitioner's case appears to be that the original power of attorney was in the custody of her husband, who has unfortunately expired and she is not aware as to where the original power of attorney has been thereafter. If that is so, the petitioner may take such a plea to submit Civil Revision No.1055 of 2009 2 that she cannot be compelled to produce something which she does not possess. Suffice it to say that if the civil Court is dis-satisfied with the petitioner's explanation, an adverse inference, if available in law, can be drawn against her for non-production of the said power of attorney. Disposed of. Dasti. (Surya Kant) Judge 22.7.2009 AS