IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14733 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 18, 2010. Harjeet Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Ms.Seema Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner alleges that respondent Nos.3 & 4, in connivance with respondent No.5, are not permitting him to enjoy and/or enter his agricultural land. Respondent Nos.3 & 4 being the local police authorities, the petitioner is said to have made a complaint against them before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur on 1.8.2010 (Annexure P-3). He now seeks a direction for appropriate action against respondent Nos.3 to 5. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, however, without expressing any views on the petitioner's allegations especially when respondent Nos.3 to 5 have not been heard at this stage, I deem it C.W.P.No .14733 of 2010 2 appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur, to consider the complaint, if any, received from the petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. However, this order shall not be taken as a direction to register a case against the private respondents. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 18, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE