@ HIGH CGURT OF CHHATTISGARH. AT BXLASEWJR S.B. HON’BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRL J. WRIT PETITION (QEQ:.A§ZZ.9££§Q7" Vijay Kumar Gupta S/o Shri R,L.Gupta Age 51 Years R/o “Arundhati Metai" Amapara, G.E. Road, Raipur (C,G.) VERSUS :1: Mumcipal Corporation Thmugh Commissioner, Raipur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Raipur (C.G.) PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Presem: Smt’ Kiran Mayee Nayak, Ad~vocate with Shri CR’Sahm, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay K, Agrawala Advocato with Shnl Ka$hif ShakoaL Advocate for respondeot No. 1. Shri V,V=S‘M001thy9 Doputy Advocato Gouoral with Shri Utkarsh Verma, Deputy Government Advocate, for respondent No. 2. ORDER (f’assed on 29m of March, 2007) L In this petition? the facts and questions of law involved are the same as that of in WP, gQ) No, 257‘ of 2007 (Deepak Kumar Shrivastava Vs, Municipal Corporation, Raipur & another) which has been disposed of toda‘ i.e. 29m of March, 2007. This etitien stands disposed F of in the same terms and conditions. 2. No order as to costs Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotrl Judge I J Amit l