. (AWcwEg‘w WW‘ mm (Wu) mmmm EB 2 i-EOE‘E’Ei-E SHRE JEISTICE P 1?.6‘72EGg ' 200 7 WW WW %3f§mm ShriVhaV‘PancieV Shri Arjviid Dube'y: g ouvm Li f5 Challanga in ths present p by respondent No.3 by have been terminated from tha p wh‘ch the semces of the petitioner passe Contention of counsei for are not cooperating with tho poi oooortunity to oresent his case a Contention of counsel for alternative remedy of fi}ing am) therefore the present petition is not maintainable. At this stage,'counse1 for present jetition with liberty to 11 direction may be isgued tor (‘e further that the oetitioner wants to withdraw the e aope .l A however submits that a siding his aoeeal exeeditious an he be given pro present his case in accordance v. Accordingly, the petition lis dismissed as withdrawn with the etoresaid liberty In the eventue Ri’I‘ENKER BEWAKER :1 for tr e petitioner. r the State. eti'tion is to the order dated 1.7.2009 3st of Shiksha Karmi Grade 1H. the oetitioner is that the authorities oner and are not giving him proper 11d therefore, their etion Wrong. [he State is that the petitioner has a“ eel befor, the respondent N02 and a‘ : opoortunitv by the Collector to it‘n law. litv of filing aooeal by the .Jetitioner before the resoondent No2, the Same would be cleciciecl striotiy in accordance with law alter giving ‘u 11 pportunity to the oetitionei: Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker £. Judge i i p i