IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2010 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3809 of 2010() ------------------------------ CRL. APPEAL NO.189/2007 of II ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, KOLLAM CC.82/2007 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-III, KOTTARAKKARA. .................... REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED ----------------------------------------------------------------------- VIJAYAKUMAR, S/O. SADANDANDAN, VIJAYA BHAVAN, PLACKODE MURI, KAREEPRA VILLAGE. BY ADVS. SRI.PREMCHAND R.NAIR SRI.TOJAN J. VATHIKULAM SRI.P.BALAGOVINDAN SRI.V.P.PRASANTH RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. G.MURALEEDHARAN, MADANVILA PUTHEN VEEDU (AMPADI), KADACKODE MURI, KAREEPRA VILLAGE. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.ANOOP U.R. R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI.V.TEK CHAND SRI.SABU SREEDHARAN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: VK P.S.GOPINATHAN, J ----------------------------------- CR.R.P.NO.3809 OF 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of December, 2010 ORDER The revision petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.82/2007 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III, Kottarakkara. The revision petitioner was found guilty for offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, convicted and sentenced to simple imprisonment for 15 days with direction to pay a sum of Rs.75,000/- as compensation to the first respondent who prosecuted the revision petitioner. Aggrieved by the above conviction and sentence, Crl.A.No.189/2007 was filed. The 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Kollam, while confirming the conviction, reduced the sentence to imprisonment till the rising of the court. Order to pay the compensation was sustained. Assailing the legality, correctness and propriety of the above conviction and sentence as modified in appeal, this revision petition was preferred. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner, submitted that the revision petitioner is seeking only time for paying the compensation. The submission is recorded. The revision petition CR.R.P.NO.3809 OF 2010 2 is dismissed. The revision petitioner is granted one month time to remit the compensation. Till then, the bail bond executed by the revision petitioner shall remain in force. In the event the revision petitioner had made any payment direct to the first respondent with proper acknowledgment that shall be given credit to. P.S.GOPINATHAN,JUDGE pm