/ , SWGLE BENCH <^ +^ )6 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (,€^N0. Un<-{! _Z_^OJ_1 PETITIONER: >^ \-K' ^•'y^ .Y^S?1. '»**!'/)v .**'. '\ .* ^i^ o^ v>"' «• RESPONDENTS: a/ IND POWER LIMITED, A Company incorporated 85 registered under Indian Companies Act, 1956, Represented by its Authorized Signatory: Mr. Dinesh Tiwari, S/o - Shri Mahabeer Tiwari, Posted as - Law Officer, Ind Power Limited . Kotmar, Mauhapalli, Raigarh (CG) VERSUS Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Jeevan Bima Nigam Premises Pandri, Raipur (CG), Through Its: General Manager. , -2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Department of Commerce SE Industries, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •^— ..;''' ^ ^ ^^ ^"" ^ ^ j J/ x» * HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASP PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRtT PETITION (Q N0.4041 OF 2011 IND POWER UMITED Versus Chhattisgarh Stete Inciustria! Devsiopmsnt Corporation Ltd. & Another (Writ Petition under Articie 227 of the Const'rtution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble ShriSatish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Goutam Bhaduri, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Dy. Advocate General for the State. ORDER (QRAU (Passed on this 27B'day of July, 2011) 1. Chalisnge in this petition is to the order dated 1S.11.2010 (Anneture P<1), whereby, the petitioner has been astod to deposil a sum of Rs.5,05,75,9SO/- as advance premium .amount and the letter dated 25.10.2010 (Annexure P-2), which was issued for the same purpose eanser. v 2. Learned eounsel appearing for the petiUoner submits that the petitioner had already paid the amount, as per understanding between the respondents and the petitioner to the tune of Rs.2,07,71,230/-. 3 . 8e that as ft may, if the condition is to pay fui! compensation and ottier amounts, which are required for acquisition of land, the petitioner cannot run away from the resppnstbilHy of deposMng tte above-stated amount in order to avail faciiity of iand acquisiBon for his project. !t does not disdose any right or causeof action asto eall for indutgence by this Court in exercise of power under Section 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. in vievif of the above, thewrit petition is dismissed. No order asto costs. ' '—- - Sd/- SATTSH K. ANGNMORI Judge ashok