IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 27092 of 2008 Between: R. Dasarath Mohan Lal S/o. Chander Mohan Lal V. Satyanarayana, S/o. Late Pantaiah, Age: 71. R/o. 8-3-228/657, Rahmath Nagar, Hyderabad - 45. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Principal Secretary Government of Andhra Pradesh Housing & Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Vice Chairman & Housing Commissioner A.P. Housing Board Nampally Hyderabad- 1. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, ordered or direction preferably one in the nature of Writ or Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representation dt.10-11-2008 for allotting 25% of share of land out of allotment land to the owners in which as alternative land allotting by the respondents for acquired lands of the owners bearing Sy.No.58, 59, 60, 61, 62 & 63 of Yousufguda and 106 and 107 Bhalool Khan Guda and 61 of Ameerpet earlier as arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider my representation dt.10-11-2008 for allotting 25% of share in the land out of allotment land to the owners in which as alternative land allotting by the respondents 1and 2 for acquired lands of the owners bearing Sy.No.58, 59, 60, 61, 62 & 63 of Yousufguda and 106 and 107 Bhalool Khan Guda and 61 of Ameerpet earlier in favour of Petitioner (Irrevocable General Power of Attorney Holder). Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.RAMBABU SAMBANGI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO W.P.NO. 27092 OF 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission as sought for is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ______________________ B.PRAKASH RAO,J Dated:29.05.2009 kvrm HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO W.P.NO. 27092 OF 2008 DATED: 29.05.2009