\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHB&TTIS0ARH AT BILASPUR •-f—— w•PN0410^ /2003 PETITION^Rs T •< >...^ K^"" ^^y ^ S'- .;<.' ^ IS&ONDENTS! ^x^ --^ Suresh Mishra^ S/o Badri Narayan Mishra^ agfed about 32 years^ R/o C/o Shri Ch.andra Shekhar Tiwari Electric Driver, Post Chonwaridand^ Teh, Manendgarh^Distt, KoreQ Chhattisgarhe t VERSUS: !<, State of Chhattisgarh^ Throughs Its Secretar^^ Schedule Tribe /Sechedule Cast Other baclward Class Qrid Minority Development Depa i?tn)ent ^ D K S Bhawan, Raipur(CX3) 2 ^ comroissioner ^ Sechedule CaSt/Sechedule Tribes , Oj:her backwards Class & Minority e^Dev<eio e£it Deptt<» D K S Bhawan RaxpurAChhattxsgarh 3e ^sstt» commissioner^ Tribal Development Deptt^ Korea, Chha11isgarh PETITION:'UNDER^RTICLE 226/^27 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA =F XI-HC-22 •^ ^niRT^r f^TW^^T ^Rff^TTlft?? ^f r ^"^f '^rraM^, ^WTS, t^TRTy anr^T t?^? H<P.'^o. ^//(56/Z^?J ^"•"•--•----•'"y-^200 ^rwfi^hNi^ •^^t' 3T[^T ^"^TT^T TrfN H wffhout 21/04/2004 Shri Viaod DeshmuKh^ State by Shri Akhil Agarw^l, AppUcatkm for ux^eia.t hes|ri2ig Heard, The matter relates to fhe <k Leamed counsel for Uie present the petitioner may b^ detafled representation befoife respondents, which sfaaai be Having coasidered and merits of (he case, m fhe opiniojai seryed if a direction is gwen reprcsentatioii raisiag his of fhe respondents along witfa wifhia a montti, aad on competeat aufhority of fbe cwn mente m SK^cordaace wifU wifhin ftoee months J&om tfae is made clear that if aay avail fhe remedy avaflabte Wifh fhe aforesaid of. C.C, as per rules, cc|unsel for fhe pedtk>iier. P,L. on ajdvance €!0py» is aUowed, Ghl^Id41'i "HF^Tf ^ fe^ iPn^K ^RT^^R^I^T lompa^sionate appointanent \e petitioner submtts that for ttie g^ven an opportunity of filing the }e the competent autiiority of ISie (»nsideredexpeditiously. expxess&ag aay o^pbiioii oa tfae of fhte Court, ends ofjiistfce wfll be ^o the petitKX&er to axiake a <letaited bcfore fhe competent aufhoaly copy of (he pelition aad thfe oxder, rqorese&tatioik being fited, fhe shaU dtecide the sssne on its tew as eariy as possible preftsratdy of receipt of fhe repres^ntertion. It stffl remains, tfae petiMoner may taw. i|atioiis, (his petitioai staiids diapos^d grtev^aices s4cfa res^ondents d^ite gxiRve|aice zmdeilthe obsenilatioiis Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge L-li^ ^l<3^ 'm ',-—