IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20651 of 2010 1. KUSUM DEVI 2. Suresh Prasad 3. Raushan Kumar Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Considering the generalized nature of allegations under Section 498(A) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, let the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 above named surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna City (Patna) in connection with Complaint Case No. 467/2009. The submission on behalf of petitioner no. 3/husband is for revival of matrimonial harmony. Let the petitioner no. 3 namely Raushan Kumar surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail for a period of six months on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna City (Patna) in connection with Complaint Case no. 467/2009. If during this period of six months or thereafter, the petitioner appears physically before the Court below and prays for regular bail, his application shall be considered on its own merits in light of the intervening development and respective attitude of the parties, without being prejudiced by the present order. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)