IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 5605 of 2011-F Decided on: 16th November, 2011. Raksha Sharma Vs. State of H.P. & others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Ms. Charu Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved since she has not been selected as Anganwari Supervisor. In the reply filed by respondents No. 1 and 2, it is seen that all the applicants are required to pass a screening test and the petitioner has not passed the screening test. Yet, another contention pertains to the question as to whether the petitioner should be treated as OBC or not. That issue would arise for consideration only in case the petitioner has passed the screening test. Having not passed the screening test, it is not necessary for us to consider as to whether the petitioner is to be treated as OBC or not. The third contention is that those who have been selected are not qualified. In the reply, it is stated that they are qualified. We do not think it necessary to examine that contention also with notice to the parties at the instance of the person who is not in any case entitled for consideration for appointment since she has not passed the screening test. 2 Therefore, we do not find any merit in the writ petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 16th November, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (tr/kck) Judge. 3