IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A. No. 2475 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: November 08, 2011 Hawa Singh and others .. Appellants Vs. Rajbir and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the appellants. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) The trial court vide judgment dated 29.4.2010 decreed the suit for possession by way of partition filed by the plaintiff- respondents. The appeal filed against the judgment was also dismissed by the Appellate Court vide judgment dated 29.1.2011. Both these judgments are now under challenge by way of this regular second appeal. The only argument raised by the learned counsel for the appellants is that though the decree for partition may not be interfered but modification could be made in the judgment while mentioning that the possession of the parties may be protected at the time of final partition. In this regard it may be observed that the preliminary decree for partition has been passed allotting the land as per shares of the parties. However, this question with regard to protection of possession could be looked into at the time of final partition. Dismissed. November 08, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge