-^ IN^THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) N0^ s 72010 S8i i^ i^ PETITIONERS ^(W/ p .* /^ /- ^l.^ .\v-'^y^y ^Mf ^•^y •V" ~\ •^ ^ v^ iy *¥' RESPONDENTS /^; y csi / ^i xv -:. ' -9 j S.SyKBB^&ik | -^ t^ ^s. y '^' -•- .V- '^^ 1. Smt. Anita Dutta Rai, W/o Shri Shyamal Dutta Rai, aged about 47 years, Principal, Govt. Girls High School, Manjhapara, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) 2. Pratul Kumar Biswas, S/o Shri Vijay Kumar Biswas, aged about 45 years, Lecturer, Govt. Girls High School, Manjhapara, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS : l." State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipiir (C.G.) 2. ' Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) 3/ Treasury Officer, Treasuiy, Accounts and Pension, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) 3?l4?I qiT f^'fe WT 3TTt?T ^rqt^i' d-cc| •<l|<liw<l, ©fll+l'lfi,Is|fl!-y^< ...^f.;..^.....^....ri2?f^ an^r^raw (^f^s?) TOnw^ftHan^fi <*il<i(?l<fl-f tfWdl''? fs^S •^? 3TRPT an^t SB : HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEPRaTINKBRDIWAKER 04.10.2010 Shri Sonikant Venna, Shri Praveen Das, Dy. Q cdunsel petitio4crs Counsel for the are entitled to benefit oftwo they having passed B.Ed. exa^ at their own cost. It is submil present petition is no longer ^ finatly decided by the Hon'b^ Asha Saxena Vs. State of M 59. It is further submitted sinular view in its order datei 6257/2008. Counsel for fhe p order dated 29.4.2010 passe iu another Writ Appeal No. fer the pctitioners. A. for the State, subinits tiiat the pctitioncrs (dvance iacreiuents on account of :a^am.ation before ttieir appoiatment Eted that the issue iavolved ia the ^s infegra and fhe same has been Supreme Court ia ffae case of (.P. & Ors. 2009 (IIIJMPJR (SC| Ithat ffais Court Iias also taken a jl 6.2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. •titioners further submits fhat the {1 m Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, wherein relying upon the jud^iaent ofthe Supreme Court in the case ofAsha Saxena (supra) ^ad fhe order passed by fhis Court 87 / 2009, directions havc been Couasel for the State would also bc ooiisiderecl on issued for consideration of t.|ie case for grant of two advance iocrements as per ciTcular dajted 21.9.1974 issued by the State of Madhya PTadesh, after vertpcation of the facts pleaded ia the petition. si^bmits fhat case ofthe petitioners me sataeTtnes. —~ XI-HC—78 ^ST •<ii<4i<iq,8)-niy'i<o, fs|diy^< ..\^:.ff..:.C^...G^....^. 1° sil^'nira^ (yif^'5)'^) OT^T ^iT R(-li+ (ni3Ut?TWqH? 'reirw ^Hfro OT^r In view of above, the direction to the respondent petitioners for graat of two dated 21.9.1974 issued by th( verification of fhe facts pleade^ e^ht weeks froui today. Ipetition is disposed of wifh a aulthorities to decide the clauu ofthe ad^ance increments as per circular State of Madhya Pradesh after in the petition wittun a penod of ^I^^'T 'IHR^ff ^' f^^S' <F^K ^atRrasn^; Sd/- pritinkerDiwakar Judge