IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 4836 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 4836 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 4836 OF 2007 Shrikant Nilkanth Upasani .... Petitioner versus Shreya Shrikant Upasani & ors...... Respondent. Shri Vilas B.Tapkir for the petitioner Shri Anant Vadgaonkar for the respondent. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 13TH AUGUST, 2007 DATED; 13TH AUGUST, 2007 DATED; 13TH AUGUST, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. An order poassed by the Family Court awarding interim maintenance to the wife in the sum of Rs. 5000/- per month has been challenged by filing the writ petiiton. It has come on record that the respondent wife has to maintain herself so also the child and considering the same, interim maintenance has been granted. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent has pointed out that as yet the arrears of interim maintenance has not been paid, which the learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to deposit in the Family court within a period of three weeks from today. 2. Perused the order. The same does not call for any interference. However, ends of justice would be met if the petition is expeditiously decided by the Family court. Both the parties are in agreement in regard to issuance of direction for expeditious disposal of the petition. Though the writ petition is summarily dismissed, I direct the Family Court to decide the petition No.C-63/06 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from today. The learned counsel at this stage voices his apprehension that the Family Court may be influenced by the interim order while deciding the amount of permanent maintenance. The apprehension is wholely unfounded for the reasons that the impugned order is an interlocatory order and takes a primafacie view of the matter. ...