IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7418 of 2010 PHOOL CHAND KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 11/03/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The defence of the petitioner in a police case under Sections 363 and 366(A) of the Penal Code is that the informant himself acknowledges that the petitioner was residing in his house and was, therefore, well-known to the alleged victim 15 years of age, who has gone missing from the school. There is no allegation that the petitioner has taken her to the school. In the entirety of the facts and circumstances were the petitioner is alleged along with the Principal of the school to be suspected to have eloped with the girl, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Biharsharif in connection with Giriyak P.S. Case No. 169 of 2009. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)