IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2294 of 2007 PRATAP SINGH Versus PRABHA SINGH ----------- 2. 4.9.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court a sum of Rs. 1800/- fixed by way of maintenance against the petitioner, a constable in Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), cannot be said to be either excessive or illegal. Even if the entire case of the petitioner is believed it would not be more than 1/3rd as on the date of impugned order and of course today after the new pay revision it will be only 1/10th or even less than that. Thus the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner on the quantum does not impress this Court. No other point has been also argued and therefore, this application is dismissed with the direction to the petitioner to pay the amount both arrear and current within a period of two months from today. ( Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/