IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40192 of 2008 1. MITHILESH KUMAR 2. BINOD KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Police case under Sections 201, 353 of the Penal Code and Sections 22(3), 27 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The defence is that petitioner no. 1 was a valid licensee and petitioner no. 2 is his brother. Denying the allegations, it is next submitted that the Magistrate concerned had also recorded that the seal of the room where the medicine had been stocked was intact. Be that as it may considering that petitioner no. 1 was a valid licensee, let the petitioners, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gaya in Buniyadganj P.S. case No. 50 of 2008, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)