T XI-HG—78 a^T^T'f^TW ^^nr 3?|T^T 5^^icr> W»l<iTI (t»*1ich '3^T «41<41d'4, y>ti1-H4i<o, ^Kni'My ^-.^./^JJ.^.^.^J............WI. 20Q9 3TI^?T 'q^RF ( ^Glfl<sl<i^) ^cfTW^f?^ ^rTT^T cbl^id^^i THTRTf Jf fe^ <M<^1< ^TStRW^TT^T Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Uustice Dhirendra Mishra W.PJC1 Nb.1276/2009 Petitioner Respondent 26.3.2009 (Petition under Article 2^6 of Constitution of India) Vs Smt. Kavital Nebhani, ag| Nagar, Rajpi| Nagar P^ Commission^r, NagarPalik Nigam, Raipur(CG) Mr. Sanjay Shyam Agarwal, Bythe instant petition under the petitioner is praying for direc1| Nebhani, W/o Shri Chandra Lal ?d 48 years, R/o Telibandha, Shyam r, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) lik Nigam, Raipur, Through |\dvocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjay K Agarwal, Adv<|)cate with Mr. K. Shakeel, Advocate for the respondent. Heard. ?\rticle 226 of the Constitution of India |on to the respondent authorities to extend benefit as per their own lette|- dated 1.2.2009 (Annexure P-1). ; Learned counsel for the pet|ioners submits that this petition may be disposed of in terms of the ob^ervations & directions given by this Court in W.P. (c) No.1118/2009 (J^ Nigam, Raipur) decided on 26.3.20fl objection ifthe instant petitipn is dis| In view of above, the instantl order dated 26.3.2009 passed by \ (Jagdeo Singh Garcha Vs. Nagar P^ Consequently, I.A. No.1 also| Certified copy as per rules. igdeo Singh Garcha Vs. Nagar Palik 9. Learned counsel for the r^spondent submits that he has no i>osed of in the aforesaid terms. petition is disposed of in terms of the [his Court in W.P. (c) No.1118/2009 ilik Nigam, Raipur). !stands disposed of. __^_-— Sd/- DbirendraMteh" Judge ^