Crl. Misc. No. M-33442 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-33442 of 2011 Date of Decision: November 30, 2011 Sunita and others …..Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Ashit Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana. Mr.Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the complainant. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) After hearing counsel for the petitioners, it appears that the main allegations of the prosecutrix are against Parhlad, the husband of petitioner No.1 of having sexually exploited the prosecutrix. So far as petitioners are concerned, it will be debatable during trial whether they had facilitated the crime, in any manner. Crl. Misc. No. M-33442 of 2011 [2] On the instructions of SI Om Parkash, Ms.Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana, informs that the petitioners have already joined investigation and that they are not required for any custodial interrogation. In view of the said circumstances, the petition is allowed. Interim order dated November 11, 2011 is hereby made absolute subject to all the conditions under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. November 30, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE