1 ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.897 OF 2002 State Bank of India Plaintiff. Vs. Mr.Dushyant Joshi & Anr. Defendants. Mr. M. S. Dehlvi i/by Mr. Himaytullah for the Plaintiff. Mr. S. V. Phadke i/by Mr. L.C. Joshi for the Defendants. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED : 8TH MAY, 2009. P. C. 1. Not on board, mentioned in view of urgency. Taken on board. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiff seeks permission to carry out the amendment. It is allowed. By consent, the draft amendment is taken on board. The Plaintiff to carry out amendment forthwith. 2 3. The parties have settled the matter and accordingly signed the consent terms dated 8th May, 2009. It is taken on record and marked “X”. There is no dispute about the identification and signature of the respective parties. The respective advocates have also signed the same. The statement is made that the consent terms are well within the frame work of law and the record. Both the parties are also present in the Court. 4. The suit be decreed in view of the consent terms. No costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)