FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.225/2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3500/2008 & W.P.5229/2004 [SAU. MANJUSHA ARVIND SAKHARKAR & OTHERS ..VS.. DR. VIPIN SHARMA] WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.243/2008 IN W.P.3502/2008 [RAMESH CHALAK ..VS.. DR. VIPIN SHARMA & ANOTHER] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or Directions Court's or Judge's Orders. And Registrar's Orders. CORAM : S.R. DONGAONKAR J. DATED : 4th AUGUST, 2009. Heard Shri Patil, advocate for petitioner, Shri Sudame, Advocate for respondent no.1 [In C.P.225/08] and Shri Almelkar advocate for respondent no. 17 2 [in C.P. 243/08] After hearing the parties, it appears that it would be desirable that the respondents should consider representation of the petitioner in respect of the seniority which is published on 26.8.2008 on merits. No doubt it is the contention of the respondents that the claim of the petitioner, rather objection of the petitioner, to that seniority list has been already considered, but that appears to be not disposed of by any speaking order and therefore, that has given rise to this petition. In my opinion, ends of justice would meet, if the petitioner is allowed to approach the respondents, afresh, with representation as regards his case, regarding objection to his placement in the provisional seniority list published. If such representation is preferred within 15 days, respondents to consider the same within a period of one month thereafter. With these observations, this petition stands disposed of with a liberty to petitioner to move afresh, if the circumstances to warrant later. JUDGE smp