C.W.P No. 164 OF 1987 ****** Dial Singh and another vs State of Punjab and others Present : None for the petitioners. Mr. S.S.Gill, DAG Punjab for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. H.S.Gill, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Maneej Nagrath, Advocate for respondent No.4. ******* Learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab states that he had directed the DDPO Bathinda to ascertain whether petitioner No.2 has any legal representatives. He states that as per the information given to him by the DDPO, the Halqa Patwari had made inquiries but he had not been able to find out any legal representative of petitioner No.2. As regards Jagir Singh, the other son of petitioner No.1, despite the fact that he was informed by the Halqa Patwari about the pendency of this case, none has entered appearance on his behalf. In the circumstances, I am constrained to dismiss this writ petition in default. So ordered. Liberty is, however, granted to the petitioners/legal representatives to move an application for revival of this writ petition in case they were prevented from appearing before this Court due to circumstances beyond their control. ( AJAY TEWARI ) September 30, 2010. JUDGE `kk'