IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 25567 of 2005 Between: 1 Cherukuri Vijayalakshmi, W/o.Cherukuri Vidyasagar, R/o.D.No.39-2-26, 1st Line , Gopalnagar, Ongole, Prakasam District. 2 Cherukuri Vidyasagar, S/o.Late Venkateswarlu, R/o.D.No.39-2-26, 1st Line , Gopalnagar, Ongole, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Deputy Inspector General of Police, Guntur Range, Guntur. 2 Superintendent of Police, Guntur. 3 Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District. 4 Sub-Inspector of Police, II Town Police Station, Ongole, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not discharging their duties properly to conduct investigation in Crime registered in FIR.No.73/2005 on the file of the II Town Police Station, Ongole and further direct the Respondents herein to conduct investigation in Crime in FIR.No.73/2005 on the file of the II Town Police Station, Ongole, Prakasam District and take necessary action and pass such further or other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.BHASKARA CHARY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioners seek to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not discharging their duties properly to conduct investigation in the crime registered in FIR No.73 of 2005 of II Town Police Station, Ongole, as illegal and arbitrary. A counter has been filed by the respondents stating that the investigation has been completed in the said crime and final report has also been filed in the Court of the II Additional Munsif Magistrate, Ongole on 15.12.2005 stating that the complaint given by the petitioner as false. That being so, the only course left open for the petitioner is to take appropriate steps either to file protest petition or to file a private complaint before the authority concerned. Hence, the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous and it is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:04.03.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRR}