•^- ^\ .-:'L-Y.'l--^'^V.^^. —^u^'v^^^^^^^^,^^^-^^^,.^,^^^^;•^•^^ ^•1 INTHEHI€>HCX)URTOFJUDICATUREATBIU^PURCG.G) CIVIL REVISIOW.NO. 2S^ /2003 ^ PETmONERS ^IAIMANTS ...^•- ^f 1> 1> .^^& ^^" RESmNDENlS/ 1> 2> 3^- Smt. Ramsh^la Bal, Aged 40 years W/o. Bailaram Sahu, BaHaram Sahu^ed 44 yeaiis^ S/o Kartikram Sahu,ix)th are R/o Vdl- BarxxJa.P.S-Dhansva.P.O-ShankarNagar, Raipurjah& Disst. Raipur(C.G) ¥ERSl Nunna^3ccupation,Tata 407 driver,R/o Matador Trans(K>rt A^ncy^Tetghani naka^ Raipur/Tah&Djffit.Raipur,(CG) DjneshSingh^/oRamlakhan SJngh,Cfccupat3on-Tata 407 owner, R/o Mear Kushatpur ice tactory^undar Nagar, Tah & Disst.Raipur (C.G.) j The Natlotiat Insurance Company Ltd. Through, the Divisional Manager.DjvisionaI office.Mobin NahalyG.E. Road, Raipur (CG) Ci¥ilRe¥isi6nUnder Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure B^la aggrteved by the Qrder passed by the Fifth Additioitiai Motor Accldent CSaims TribunaL and Dsstncfc^udaaRaJDUL in MJ.C No. '05/2002 datel 22.02.2003. lln the case of Smt Ramisheela Bai Vereus Munna & others. ,^^^|^^NS^i^A^;,..^'^^^%--u-1^ ^—.^ I'ttll 11,'lliill Bl 8 l-1p Kl- i^'^H' 111"/ "w-.^ l.1lil s Itl illl i Bft ji3i 'Bai :t l^ •^.•••ss-f.i^Ss'as.'s: .^ —-—^^^^- XI-HC-22 ^n^T^r f^TWW^T »sbHlch^ll^cl '^- ^^ ?<?' s: ^l^^ll ffi+licb 3^ ^l^ld^ ^TH<-111<o, R^tKiy ^.C:K\.?rMM "* *1**\* * * * * ir^*«~*•/• * *'^* ^ 200 RsooS 3TT^T ^<TT^KW^[ ^ <=t)i^I^41vi *4iH^T^:te11:^'<Ri<-<.i< ^3Tf^T3TT^?T 09-03-2005 Shri S.C.Verma.Counsel ^orthe applicants. This revision petition has |?een preferred by the applicants against the impugned order dated 22-t02-2003 passed in MJC No. 05/2002 whereby the prayer of the app|icants for withdrawal of amount of Rs. 3,12.000/- has been rejected oi|i the ground that against the impugned award Insurance Company has fi|led the appeal and the same is pending. In this view of the matter) the counsel for ttie petitioners seeks to withdraw this revision petition wi|th liberiy to fite appropriate application in the pending appeal preferred by nsurance Company. Accordingly, the petitionei^ arepermitted to do so and the reviswn is dismissed as withdrawnwith lilt>erty as aforesaid. As prayed, certified copy |of the impugned order be retumed to the J Sd/- DhirendraMisItra Judge (^y^)