l» K;i8Uai[iiuH ^ \ SINGLE BENGH IN THE HIQH COURT JUDICATUKE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CIVIL REVISION N0 <a-r? /2005 AppUcants 1. Defendant No. 1 to 3 . < ^ ^ 2- AW 3. ^y ' •^* .<.^' ^''A< / t">¥y Bhawan S/o Koreva Aged about 52 years Vishambhar S/o Thepa, Aged about 56 years CharkuS/oTerku, Aaed about 70 vears AU by caste Goan R/o Vfllage - Kundikalla, Tehsil - Lundra, Dist: Surguja-fC.G.) Versus Respondent /PIaintiff Respondent (Fl 'Defendant n.o.4 1. Budhiyaro / S/o Aalam Sai ; W/o Sinu Goan, Aged about 50 years, R/o VUlaee Bakna, Talisfl - Luadra, Dist: Surguja-(C.G-) 3.. The State of Chhattisgarh Through - CoUector Surguja - (C.G.) MEMO OF CIVIL REVISION U/S 115 OF THE_CODE OF CrVIL PROCEDURE 1908 J -t XI-HC-22 ^sn^iq;! 'f?;R?T 3t1^t 1 • shW'h "Hft^ ^5[ •^ipn^pT, d-di'u'iti. s^ci'-yy C.S, MV.. ^ s siI^FTOtIWBftg '^T£if^4NT?R^1T ^ 1^^ <r^l-^.!< ^? sipgi? 3ii^r 10.03.2006 I No one oppeors fw the applicjmts. None for re^iondent No. 1. | Stri Jitendranath Nande, P<a(el Lawyer for respondent No.2. Once Ihe caas has been cnB^d out during the eou-se of the day, bul- for wont of prosecution on behalf of the ((ipetlant/it was passed <wer. Now, the case has been caljed out agoin, but none appears for the appellont, hence the (ppeal is di^nissed for wopt of appeanmce ofjthe^ appellant. -—-— Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge Isrfl