IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-13532 of 2010 Date of Decision: May 10, 2010 Ravi Inder Singh @ Ravi & Others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. A.K. Walia, Advocate, for the petitioners. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No.114 dated 15.9.2008 lodged for commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 307, 324, 323, 148, 149 IPC with Police Station, Talwandi Sabo, District Bathinda and consequent proceedings. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the parties are related to each other. The injured was examined in private hospital. Crl. Misc. No. M-13532 of 2010 [2] I have considered the contentions of learned counsel. Quashing of the FIR and consequent proceedings is sought on the basis of compromise. The manner in which the incident has taken place is required to be considered. Relevant portion of the FIR reads as under:- “.... My brother Narinder Singh ran towards Gurudwara Sahab out of fear when Teji Singh Sarpanch gave a Kirpan blow on the head of my brother and Ravi S/o Teji Singh also gave a Kirpan blow in front of his head near the forehead and Kuldeep Singh gave a dang blow on the back of my brother, and Raju Singh gave gandasa blow on the left upper arm of my brother. My brother fell down and all these persons inflicted more injuries on him with their respective weapons when he was lying down.” I find that a number of persons came armed with sharp edged weapons and caused multiple injuries on the person of Narinder Singh, brother of the complainant. No ground for quashing on the basis of compromise is made out. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) May 10, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?