IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4295 of 2010 SMT.SHIROMANI DEVI WIDOW OF LATE SACHIDA NAND SHARMA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – P.S. BEGUSARAI, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, RAILWAY RAIL BHAWAN, NEW DELHI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, NEW DELHI. 3. THE GENERAL MANAGER, EASTERN RAILWAY, KOLKATA. 4. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, EASTERN RAILWAY, HOWRAH, KOLKATA. ----------- 02. 11.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Union of India. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon the death of her husband in harness while he was in operation in the Railway Protection Force. It is submitted that on perusal of the Annexure- 1, it would appear that petitioner has not been paid full amount with interest on different heads. Besides the above, husband of the petitioner was also entitled to get compensatory allowances being a sum of rupees three lacs fifty thousand as he died while in operation in the Railway Protection Force. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent – Union of India submits that on perusal of the Annexure-1 which has been issued on 14th of 2 January 2010, it would appear that it has also been informed to the petitioner that if petitioner is not satisfied, she will be at liberty to file an appeal within forty days. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ application so as to enable the petitioner to agitate her grievance by filing a representation before the concerned authority. In case, such representation is filed, the authority concerned shall consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law. The writ application is permitted to be withdrawn with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)