WPSS No.116 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Sri A. V. Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri Subhash Upadhyaya, Brief Holder for the State. The petitioner has filed a Writ Petition No.860 of 2009 (S/S) against a show cause notice for recovery of Rs.65,163, which was paid to the petitioner in excess of his salary. The said writ petition was dismissed by a judgment dated 11.11.2009 directing the petitioner to file a reply to the show cause notice and the authorities were directed to pass an order in accordance with law. Based on the aforesaid direction, the authorities have passed an order dated 02.02.2010 holding that the petitioner had concealed the material fact about the dismissal of the writ petition No.34721 of 1992 by an order dated 24.02.2004 and continued to draw the salary of the Branch Manager, and, as a matter of fact, he was an Assistant Accountant and was entitled to receive the wages of that post only. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the said order, has filed the present writ petition. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, this Court finds that nothing has been stated about the earlier writ petition No.34721/1992 which was dismissed on 24.02.2004. The said writ petition was against an order whereby the petitioner was sent to his original post of Assistant Accountant. Since the order was stayed he continued to draw the salary of the Branch Manager and even after the dismissal of the writ petition, the petitioner concealed this fact and continued to draw the salary of the Branch Manager. In my opinion, the impugned order does not suffer from any error of law since the petitioner has concealed material facts. The petition is dismissed accordingly. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 26.02.2010 LSR