FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.245 OF 2009 AND WRIT PETITION NO.1180 OF 2009. ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2 The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be content even if they were considered for being appointed on contract basis in future. 3 The learned A.G.P. has invited our attention to Paragraph 8 of the decision of the tribunal dated 12th June, 2006 in Original Application No.1168 of 2005 when similar plea was taken on behalf of the petitioners. The tribunal has observed that it will be open to the petitioners to apply in response to the advertisement and compete in the selection process along with others and if selected, they may be appointed on contractual basis. The respondents through Counsel submit that this observation of the tribunal will be complied with if the petitioners were to apply pursuant to advertisement on contractual basis. 4 In the circumstances, since no further direction is invited, both these petitions are disposed of on the above terms. In view of this order, interim relief stands vacated and the concerned posts would be available for appointment against the advertisement dated 10th December, 2007. It may be open to the respondents to consider issuing fresh advertisement if the selection process in terms of the advertisement issued in 2007 has lapsed on account of any Rules in operation. (S.S. SHINDE, J) (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J) 01.02.2010. PLK/*