1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 534 OF 2009 Smt.Dagdabai Moru Tapkir & ors. ... Appellants v/s 1. M/s.Gaikwad Associates & ors. ... Respondents Mr.A.S.Daver a/w Sayeed Mulani i/by Mulani & Co. for the appellants. Mr.V.B.Naik i/by S.K.Kulkarni for Resp. Nos.1 to 5. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 7TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C.: 1. The appellants have approached this Court contending that the Trial Court has erred in rejecting the application filed at Exh.5. 2. The main contention of the appellants is that they should be secured with respect to the suit property. It appears that the respondents had agreed to pay Rs. 55,00,000/- so that conveyance could be executed between the parties. It appears further that the appellants do not 2 agree to that as they are insisting on interest being paid. 3. In my view, the appeal from order can be disposed of by accepting the statement made by Mr.Naik, learned advocate appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 5, on instructions from respondent No.4 who is present in Court that, respondent Nos.1 to 5 will deposit the amount of Rs. 55,00,000/- within two weeks from today in the Trial Court. Once this amount is deposited, the Trial Court shall invest the same in a fixed deposit of a nationalized bank, initially for a period of three years, to be renewed thereafter. 4. Appeal from order stands disposed of accordingly. .....