IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6277 of 2010 BIRAJU SAO @ SADHU SAO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 23.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail as the petitioner is denying signature and thumb impression in name of his another name, while the submission on behalf of the complainant is that he is involved in such acts in different names. He is the person who executed the deed of agreement to sale and now not executing sale deed in compliance of the agreement otherwise also he is only the owner of the land of the deed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)