^mQkQ^ ^O^i'r,^-, BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (C) N0., 7_323_, 2011 PETITIONER ..^^¥ a>.!^.^" v^^^^ ^^^' ^®"" RESPONDENTS (!^t^-^.\ \\ ^'y^^^! . <^'^' •:€^^^^y Ramkishen Agrawal, S/o. LateShri Ramdhan Agrawal, Aged about 58 years, R/o. Lailunga, District - Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS ^A. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) 3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRTT PETmON (C) No. 7323 of2011 Ramkishen Agrawal. ® RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmJTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotoi, J. Present: Shri Sourabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for tihe State/respondent No. 1 and 3. Shri Amn Sao, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. ORDER (Passed on 07tBday ofDecember, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits tfaat the impugned notice dated 25.11.2011 (Annexure P/l), for demolition of the alleged unauthorized constmction raised by the petitioner, has been withdrawn by the respondent authorities. Thus; nothing survives for adjudication and tiiis petition has become infinctuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side do not controvert the above submission. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infiiictuous. — Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit