1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU Writ Petition (MD) No.893 of 2011 V.Elanji ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Project Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Integrated Child Development Project Officer, T.Kallupatti, Madurai District. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, to direct the respondents to publish the result of the interview held on 24.09.2010 for selection and appointment to the post of Anganwadi Assistant to the Anganwadi Centre No.6 of T.Kallupatti Village in Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District, within a stipulated time. For petitioner .. Mr.A.Thirumurthy For respondents .. Mr.Mahesh Raja, Government Advocate ORDER The writ petition is filed for a direction to the respondents to publish the result of the interview held on 24.09.2010 for selection and appointment to the post of Anganwadi Assistant to the Anganwadi Centre at T.Kallupatti Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District. 2. When the matter came up on 24.01.2011 for admission, this Court ordered notice of motion. On notice from this Court, the second respondent has filed a counter affidavit dated 09.02.2011. The contention that the petitioner was a destitute widow was confronted by the second respondent stating that the petitioner has only produced a certificate from the local panchayat regarding her divorce and not from any competent Court and she has also not obtained certificate from the revenue officials. Even with reference to the age and education, she had not produced Transfer Certificate or Record Sheet. Further in paragraph Nos.8 & 10 of the counter affidavit, it is stated as follows; https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 "8.I submit that the interview was conducted on 24th September 2010 in T.Kallupatti block, but the interview process completed in all projects in Madurai District by the end of November 2010 only. After that the selection process is being carried out. Since District Collector is the appointing authority, he has to finalize and large number of candidates to be appointed the delay is natural. 10.I submit that the selection process has not yet been completed. As soon as the selection is over order will be issued directly to the individual to their address. The order has not yet been issued any candidate in 13 rural projects. Orders finalized and issued for candidates in 4 urban projects only i.e., for Corporation area. Selection process will be completed soon and orders will be issued in short time." 3. Since the selection process has not yet been completed and the appointments have not been finalised, the relief sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.Side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The District Project Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Integrated Child Development Project Officer, T.Kallupatti, Madurai District. +1 CC to Mr.A.Thirumurthy, Advocate (SR.No.38027) Order in W.P.(MD)No.893 of 2011 03.11.2011 gcg NSV/11.11.11/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/