FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6231 OF 2011 " M/s. Suman Trading Company through Proprietor and another Vs. I.D.B.I. Bank Ltd. and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. Prasanna N. Kutti, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.S. Deve, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. B.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent No.5 Respondents 2 and 3 served. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 22ND NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] The petitioners challenge the show cause notice issued under section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Securities Interest Act. The petitioner can very well reply the said notice, which would be taken in to consideration by the bank before passing an order under Section 13(4) of the said Act. The petitioner has also an alternate remedy of challenging the order that would be passed by the bank, by filing an appeal under Section 17 of the said Act. 2] In that view of the matter, writ petition is dismissed relegating the petitioners to avail the alternate remedy available to them in law. In the event, if there is a delay in filing the reply to the notice by the petitioners, in view of pendency of the present petition, the respondent bank would accept the said reply, if filed, within 15 days from today. [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-