IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.560 OF 2008 PETITION NO.560 OF 2008 PETITION NO.560 OF 2008 Mohd. Ejaz Mohd. Shafi Ansari ... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. V.S. Rajguru, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P. for the State. WITH WITH WITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.561 OF 2008 PETITION NO.561 OF 2008 PETITION NO.561 OF 2008 Mrs. Atharunnisa Mohd Shafi ... Petitioner Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. V.S. Rajguru, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. S.D. Shinde, A.P.P. for the State. WITH WITH WITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.562 OF 2008 PETITION NO.562 OF 2008 PETITION NO.562 OF 2008 Mohd. Shafi Mohd. Nazir Ansari ... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. V.S. Rajguru, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. D.S. Mhaispurkar, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE, & : B.H. MARLAPALLE, & : B.H. MARLAPALLE, & R.Y. R.Y. R.Y. GANOO, JJ GANOO, JJ GANOO, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 13TH JUNE, 2008 : 13TH JUNE, 2008 : 13TH JUNE, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. :- :- :- 1. In all these petitions the grievances are 2 common namely the show cause notices issued for forfeiture of the deposit amount paid for a bond executed under Section 117 of Cr.P.C. The said notice has been issued under Section 122-B of Cr.P.C. on 10/8/2007. 2. Undoubtedly, the petitioners have liberty to reply the said show cause notice and if any adverse order is passed against them, they may have a statutory remedy of filing a criminal revision application before the Sessions Court. 3. Therefore, we do not find any reason to entertain these petitions, at this stage. 4. Petitions are therefore rejected. ( B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.) B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.) B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.) ( R.Y. GANOO, J.) R.Y. GANOO, J.) R.Y. GANOO, J.)