IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 21ST JANUARY 2011 / 1ST MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 2242 of 2011(E) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------- T.HYMAVATHY, EKARATH HOUSE, PINARAYE, P.O.PINARAYE. KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.P.DEEPAK, SMT.APARNA RAJAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE MANAGER, KELALUR.U.P.SCHOOL, KELALUR.P.O., MAMBARAM, KANNUR DIST-670 641. 2. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, THALASSERY-679 532. 3. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. R2 & R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. NISHA BOSE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/01/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.2242/2011-E ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 21st day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner seeks for a direction to dispose of Ext.P6 revision petition pending before the third respondent. The matter relates to denial of approval of appointment of the petitioner as leave substitute U.P.S.A for the period from 04/06/2007 to 04/09/2011. Ext.P1 is the copy of the order of appointment. The Assistant Educational Officer declined approval stating that earlier appointment relating to one Smt.P.K.Sheena was also not approved. Challenging this, the Manager filed an appeal before the District Educational Officer as per Ext.P4 which was rejected by Ext.P5 order. The Government allowed the revision petition filed by the said Smt.P.K.Sheena and approval was granted retrospectively from 01/04/2007, a copy of which is evidenced by Ext.P7. 2. Hence, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the main reason for rejection of the approval of appointment of the petitioner is no longer subsisting and there is no legal bar also. It is also W.P.(C). No.2242/2011 -:2:- stated that the other reasons with regard to the non approval of appointment in uneconomical school will not apply to this school as it is a leave vacancy. I am not going into the merits of the matter since it is upto the Government to take a decision on Ext.P6. The date of Ext.P6 is 21/07/2008. There will be a direction to the third respondent to take a decision on Ext.P6 after hearing the petitioner and the Manager in the light of Ext.P7 within a period of two months. The petitioner will produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of the Judgment before the third respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms