IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16058 of 2005 Badri Narayan Dubey, Son of Late Dhanukdhari Dubey, resident of Village- Bhitaha, P.O. Bhitaha Nizamat, P.S. Bairia, District- West Champaran. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Gunakar Shukla Son of Late Murlidhar Shukla, resident of Village- Bhitaha, P.O. Bhitaha, Nizamat, P.S. Bairia, District- West Champaran. -------------------------------- 2. 01.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The writ application has been filed for a direction to Sub-Judge III, West Champaran at Bettiah to conclude proceeding and pronounce Judgment of Title Suit No. 24 of 1989 and Title Suit No. 141 of 1989 in which it is submitted that evidence have been adduced and arguments closed after hearing but Judgment was not delivered. It is stated that since the issue involved in both the Title Suits were similar, by order of the District Judge, both were to be tried together and thus the same have been made analogous. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at one point of time the Court concerned had reserved order but due to non availability in the record of some evidence on behalf of the plaintiff, the matter was being delayed and a direction was given to the office to locate the same. This is apparent from the certified copy 2 of the ordersheet in Title Suit No. 24 of 1989 which has been produced by learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of argument which is present in order dated 13.9.2000. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is defendant in both the suits, has in his possession certified copies of such depositions which he is ready to submit to the Court so that the missing part of the records may be reconstructed. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed off directing the petitioner to submit the certified copies of the missing records which are in his possession, if the same has not already been traced out. Upon submissions of such certified copy of the deposition, alongwith a copy of this order, the Court below shall proceed to hear final arguments and pass Judgment within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in the manner as directed above, if already not disposed off. Anand Kr. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)