- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.7369 OF 2004 Mr.R.S.Apte for the Petitioner. ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. ¦ DATED: 13TH APRIL,2005 P.C.: 1. The suit against the Petitioner is for damages. Therefore as observed by the trial court, there was no question of the Corporation applying to the court for its permission to remove the skeleton of the hotel. The trial court has, in my opinion, rightly observed that it is the Corporation/Petitioner who is in position and it can decide whatever it has to do in relation to the property. There is no interim order passed against the Corporation. Therefore, I do not find any error in the order impugned. Petition is disposed of. - 2 - ...