IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.19120 OF 2009 SHAILENDRA PASWAN WITH CR.MISC. NO.19841 OF 2009 SANJAY PASWAN VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 30.07.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State. Petitioners are accused in a case registered for offence under section 394 of the penal code. The prosecution case in short is that one Laxmi lal, Field analyst in Macro Finance Limited and his companion were returning after making calculation at 9 am on 26.12.2009. In the meantime four motorcycle borne miscreants intercepted them and snatched their mobile phone, money and other documents available with them. Petitioners states that they are not named in the FIR. Petitioner Shailendra Paswan submits that he has not been identified in TI parade also. However, petitioner Sanjay Paswan has been identified in the TI parade and almost after a month some witnesses claiming to be eye witness implicated them in this case. Learned State counsel submits that pursuant to confessional statement of Sanjay Paswan a looted mobile phone was recovered from the premises of one Upendra Prasad. The aforesaid Upendra Prasad took the name of petitioners also as a co accused. However, on the confessional statement of Sanjay Paswan the looted mobile phone has been recovered. The aforesaid Upendra Prasad has taken - 2 - name of Sanjay Paswan also. Prayer for bail of the petitioners is refused. Petitioner Shailendra Paswan may renew the prayer for bail after five months. Petitioner Sanjay Paswan may renew the prayer for bail after a year. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J).