1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.01.2019 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.Nos.13970 to 13974 and 14448 to 14450 of 2007 and M.P.Nos.2 to 2 and 2 to 2 of 2007 K.Mohan ... Petitioner in W.P No.13970 of 2007 R.Senthil Kumar ... Petitioner in W.P No.13971 of 2007 N.T.Elangovan ... Petitioner in W.P No.13972 of 2007 S.Boominathan ... Petitioner in W.P No.13973 of 2007 B.Elanchelian ... Petitioner in W.P No.13974 of 2007 S.Ganesan ... Petitioner in W.P No.14448 of 2007 R.Sethuraman ... Petitioner in W.P No.14449 of 2007 R.Kalaichelvi ... Petitioner in W.P No.14450 of 2007 Vs 1.Deputy Superintending Engineer,(C)/SE(C), Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd, Having Registered at Jeevan Bharathy Tower-II, No.124, Indira Chowk, New Delhi – 110 001. 2.Office of Chief Engineer (Civil), In-Charge, Civil Section, Engineering Services, ONGC, Cauvery Asset, Karaikal. http://www.judis.nic.in 2 3.The In-Charge Tender Cell, Civil Section, Engineering Services, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., Cauvery Asset, Neravy, Karaikal, Pondicherry (UT). ... Respondents in all W.Ps. Common Prayer: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent in tender No.ONG-KKL-CA- CE(C)-T (VC1CC07024)-2006-07 dated 23.03.2007 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to call for the tenders as was done hitherto in order to enable the petitioners and other registered contractors to participate in the tender process. For Petitioners : No Appearance For Respondents : M/s.K.Shanmugakani COMMON ORDER The challenge made in these writ petitions is with regard to tender notification dated 23.03.2007 issued by the second respondent for construction of civil works. 2.On 03.01.2019, when the matters were taken up for consideration, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the matters were directed to be posted today i.e., on 07.01.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in 3 under the caption “for dismissal”. Accordingly, these writ petitions have been listed today, under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioners. 3.However, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that the tender period itself is over and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in these writ petitions. 4.Recording the submission so made by the learned counsel for the respondents, these writ petitions stand dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 07.01.2019 Index: Yes/No rk/jas http://www.judis.nic.in 4 R.MAHADEVAN, J. rk W.P.Nos.13970 to 13974 and 14448 to 14450 of 2007 07.01.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in