IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2892 of 2008 BINOD KUMAR SINGH, son of late Arjun Prasad Singh, resident of village – Ahmadpur, P.S. Sarairanjan, District – Samastipur. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Secretary, Building Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Chief Engineer, Building Construction Department (North), Sub-Division, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Superintending Engineer, Building Construction Department, Darbhanga. 5. The District Magistrate, Samastipur. 6. The Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Samastipur. ----------- 02. 31.03.2010 From the counter affidavit it is apparent that payment to the petitioner has been made but counsel for the petitioner submits that it is not the payment in accordance with the bills raised. There is some variance in the amount came than the actual payment. Looking at the fact that substantial amount of payment has been made, petitioner may try to understand the basis for calculation of the dues by approaching the authorities. If he does not satisfy then he may take appropriate action in this regard. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observation. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J )