IN THEHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W,P.(S.)NO. ^o^ /2009 PETITIONER ,..•" ^^..^••' Y-^^p^ .^y ^^^ Hemant Kumar Manikpuri S/o. ' Late Arti Das Manikpuri, Aged 'About 33 Years, R/o Village ' Navagaon, Post Narayanpur, , Block Navagarh, District Bilaspur ' (C.G.) t^--' RESPONDENTS VERSUS ^MA4^ ^> ~ <^> ^. ^^\ • ( S.R^ta^Ajk j ^ | ^.^^ A^. ^ ^ '*»nn^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) t^--" 2. The District Education Officer Durg,District Durg (C.G.) 3. The Block Education Officer, Block Navagarh, District Durg (C.G.) ^—^-- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR_JSSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. :C—78 3T?^T ^T f^yNF ^W 3?n^T ^^icr> <f\ <LA 'TST '^TFn^PT, ©TilwKo,fc«ll-H^< ^^^^...W....&...&....^......^,oo^ 3T1^TTWF (yii^<^?) ^TOT^rft^ W^T SB; HON'BLB SHRI JUSTICB PlEUTINKBR DIWAK^ 20.8.2009 Shri V.Rathore, counsel ft Shri Vivek Sharma, P.L. l^r Contention of the petiti| covered with the decision of tnt orders passed by this Court in i(| Counsel for the petition^r this petition wifh. liberty: tc| respondent No.l. He further su| for deciding the representati]3n expeditiously. Counsel for the State a position to make any stateni| petitioner is covered by the oi|< •identical writ petition. He ho^ make a representation to the decided strictly in accordance w{ Accordingly, the petition liberty as aforesaid. In the] representation by the petitioner| the date of receipt of the copy o} be decided within a period of th^ee [)F the petition.er. the State. oner is that his case is squareiy S Supreme Court and also various ientical matters. at this stage, wants to withdraw flle representation before the Ismits that direction may be issued so made ' by the petitioner, sul|>mits cM^(<n4t^ 'RTR^yf "^f 'fe^ <f^^i< cfr3ffim377^?T ^mits that at this stage he is not in bnt as to whether the case of the |der passed in the aforementioned ever submits that let the petition t'espondent No. 1 which would be [th law. is dismissed as withdrawn with the eventuality of filing any such within a period of three weeks from this order^ the same is expected to months. ,- -——- —— (^ Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge k