Crl. Revision No.2638 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Revision No.2638 of 2010 Date of decision:- 29.09.2011 Sudhir Kumar ....Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Baljinder Singh Sra, Addl. A.G., Punjab. ***** A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Amritsar, tried four accused namely Ujaggar Mal, Sham Lal, Darshan Lal and Lal Chand, out of them, the Court, vide judgment dated 28.11.2008, had acquitted Lal Chand, whereas remaining three accused were convicted under Sections 325, 326/34 IPC. However, during the appeal, the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar, vide judgment dated 19.05.2010, while confirming the conviction and sentence of accused Darshan Lal and Sham Lal, dismissed their appeal, whereas, appeal qua Ujaggar Mal was accepted. Now the complainant-petitioner has challenged the acquittal of Ujaggar Mal by way of this revision petition. Crl. Revision No.2638 of 2010 2 Ujaggar Mal is alleged to have grappled with the complainant, but no injury is attributed to him. His participation in the commission of the crime, as per evidence, is doubtful. The first Appellate Court appears to have appreciated the evidence in the right perspective. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) September 29, 2011 JUDGE ajp