IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16529 of 2010 DHARMENDRA SAHNI, SON OF SHATRUGHAN SAHNI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH DIRECTOR NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU, NEW DELHI ----------- 3. 23.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 20 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act. The petitioner was granted bail by this Court by an order dated 4.3.2010 on condition that an affidavit would be filed on his behalf that he is not an accused in any other case. However, the petitioner was an accused in another case of similar nature in which he was granted bail by this Court by an order dated 19.2.2010 and, therefore, no affidavit of the nature required by this Court would be filed on his behalf. However, considering that the petitioner is in custody since 30.11.2009 and the father of the petitioner undertakes to take responsibility of the petitioner after he is released from jail custody, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, in Muzaffarpur Rail P.S. Case No. 58 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and 2 the other shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)