IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.136 of 2009 8 1.9.2010 1. Ram Nath Pandey, S/o late Ram Nagina Pandey, resident of vill. + P.O. Manihari, P.S. Manihari, Distt. Katihar Secretary of the Managing Committee, of Shiv Janam Pandey, Prathmic- Sah- Madhyamik Sanaskrit Vidyalaya, Manihari, Katihar 2. Rameshwar Pandey, Headmaster Incharge, Shiv Janam Pandey Prathmik- Sah- Madhyamik Sanskrit Vidyalaya, Manihari, District Katihar …… Petitioners VERSUS 1. The State of Bihar 2. Sri Anil Kumar, Commissioner- cum- Secretary, Primary, Secondary and Mass Education, Vikash Bhawan, Patna 3. Sri Dhananjay Kumar, Special Director (Secondary Education, Vikash Bhawan, Patna 4. Sri Sidheshwar Prasad, Chairman, Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna 5. Sri Niwash Chandra Tiwary, Secretary of Sanskrit Siksha Board, Patna ….. Opp. Parties. ------ Heard the parties. Today, learned counsel for the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board has produced a copy of memo no.151 dated 22.1.2010 to show that the petitioner Sanskrit School has been granted recognition without financial aids. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that the copy of the office order dated 22.1.2010 is faint and the name of the school appears to suffers from some - 2 - mistake inasmuch as Prathmik – Sah- Madhyamik Sanskrit Vidyalaya is not mentioned therein and it has only been described as Sanskrit Uchaya Vidayalya, Manihari. From the materials on record it is clear that on local inspection a favourable recommendation was made by the concerned authority and on that basis recognition has been granted by the Board after approval from the State Government. If there is any mistake in name of the petitioner in the office order, the Board shall take care of the same and correct it by issuing a fresh order. The contempt application is disposed of. sk (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J. )