IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 7TH JUNE 2010 / 17TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 20447 of 2009(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M/S.SOUTHERN GRANITES & INDUSTRIES COMPANY, MOOKKUNNIMALA, EDAKKODE, NEMOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, K.J.THOMAS KUTTY. BY ADV. SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS SMT.INDU SUSAN JACOB SMT.NISHA JOHN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, PALLICHAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. M.A. ASIF. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 20447 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 7th day of June, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext. P4 memo, whereby the petitioner has been directed to stop quarrying allegedly done illegally, causing inconvenience to the residents of the locality. I am of opinion that having issued Ext. P4 memo, the 1st respondent has a duty to pass final orders in the matter after hearing. The learned Government Pleader submits that final order could not passed only because of the interim order passed by this Court . Having heard both sides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass final orders on Ext. P4 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. Till then, the interim order passed in this case would continue to be in force. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.