THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.4212 of 2007 ORDER: The petitioner submitted an application to the respondents with a request to permit her to construct a building in the premises bearing No.3-6-450 at Himayatnagar, Hyderabad. She stated that her father had bequeathed the entire property in her favour, excluding all the other legal heirs. The Corporation rejected the permission through their letter, dated 03.02.2007. As many as five reasons were mentioned. The petitioner states that the reasons, on account of which the permission was refused, are untenable in law. The order of rejection is challenged in this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The reasons mentioned in the impugned letter are as under: 1. That you have not enclosed the original T.S.L.R.certificate. 2. That the will deed is unregistered and the will deed is for the premises No:3-6-452 which you have submit plans for premises No:3-6- 450. 3. That the link document is not visible. 4. That you have not submitted the supervision certificate. 5. That you have not enclosed upto date property Tax receipt (upto March 2007). The first one cannot be sustained, in view of the fact that the Corporation cannot insist an applicant to furnish a copy of T.S.L.R. or No Objection Certificate obtained from the revenue authorities. So far as the other grounds are concerned, the petitioner states that she would be in a position to satisfy the respondents, in case an opportunity is given. Even now, the petitioner can treat the impugned proceedings as a notice and submit the representation/explanation. As and when such representation/explanation is submitted, the respondents can be required to consider the same and pass appropriate orders. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that it shall be open to the petitioner to submit explanation/representation dealing with the objections raised in the impugned letter dated 03.02.2007. As and when such explanation/representation is made, the respondents shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders within a period of one month thereafter. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 11.11.2009 JSU THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.4212 of 2007 Date: 11.11.2009 JSU