IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15910 of 2011 1. SANTOSH KUMAR RAI SON OF PARAS RAI. 2. PARAS NATH RAI @ PARAS RAI SON OF LATE BAL KISHUN RAI. BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – MALIKPURA, P.S. BHAWARKOLE, DISTRICT – GAZIPUR (U.P) Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 31.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State as also the Complainant who appears and file Vakalatnama. The allegation against the petitioners are in nutshell to the effect that they cheated the complaint on the assurance of getting job in the military service for which he was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 1.50 lakh. The petitioner paid a sum of Rs. One lakh to petitioner no. 1 and subsequently petitioner no. 2 handed over him on appointment letter and realized the remaining amount of Rs. 50,000/- . However, no such appointment was made and thereafter, on being demanded, the money was also not returned back to the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and there is no material to substantiate the allegation levelled against the petitioners. Learned counsel for the Complainant submits 2 that there is specific allegation against these petitioners in commission of the aforesaid offence. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the same is rejected. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)