c.^-'^ ^ 9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(S.)NO. ^°)6°/2010 PETITIONER ^hamaruLal Sidar S/o Shri Govindram Sidar, Aged about 58 Lecturer (Economics) years, ^oV0--^, ^ - I'^P^o^"' Government Higher Secondary ^,..'- ^. ^£f^W ^•-•^^•y" e.^ ^'•^ ..A-" ^•"" VERSUS RESPONDENTS •^te^ ,<-"-^ j ^^M.^^} '^Y V^~^J \^~..^7 School, Baramkela, Block Baramkela, District Raigarh (C.G.) Sfate of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director /Commissioner Lok Shikshan Sanchnalaya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) The Principal Government Higher Secondary School, Baramkela, Block : Baramkela, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY QR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. The petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under : 4. HTHdT^l^T^ "5^ r^i^i<n^, y>Tii'M<i<o, f®ldl-(-l!j,< ^,..Me..^...M.%...4.^.^.t^ ^ 200 ^n^T'q^? (tj^tg^T) ^Ti^T ^FT f^TW ^TT ^T^TsFRN? ^ ^<nW5Rf?H 3TI^?T S.B: HON'BLE JUSTSCE MR. PRiT!rtIKER DIWAKER 31-08-2010: Shri Vinod Kumar Tekam, coui Smt. Smitha Ghai, PL for the S Counse! for the petitloner withdraw the present petition with II respondent No. 2 - The Dlrec Sanchnalaya, Raipur. He submits respondent No. 2 to decide the said dated 4.11.2008 passed by this Cou!" Counse! for the State representation before the respondent after due verification ofthe fact and a Accordingiy, the writ petition libertyasaforesaid. In the eventuaiity of fliing an^ before the respondent No. 2 raising ^ respondent No, 2 to declde the san^ aspect ofthe case as expeditlously a| it is made clear that thls merits of the case and the authority (| the representatlon of the petitloner st] Colirt <=M^{<VHll '^TTR^Jf ^* fs1c^ <f^^« '^3tRTH3Tlt?T ijisel for the petltloner. Itate/respondents. si|ibmits that he may be permitted to ^erty to file representation before the ttor/ Commissioner, Lok Shikshan that direction may be Issued to -the I'representation in the lightofthe order ; in W.P. (S) No. 6098/2008 . sub^Jts that let the petitioner make a INo. 2 and the same would be dedded iper scrutlnizing theentlre case. is dismissed as wlthdrawn with the. such representatlon by the petitioner IIhis grievance, it is expected from the |e considering ail the factuai and legai ^ posslble. has not express.ed any ^oplnion on toncerned would be at iiberty to decide ^ictly in accordance with law. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge 1.