IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29605 of 2009 1. MD.AKBAR MIAN 2. RUKSANA KHATOON -------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioner no.1 is alleged for kidnapping of a married minor grand daughter of the informant. The defence is to the effect that an informatory petition was given by him against the family members of the victim but as observed by the Sessions Judge, witnesses are there to state that they saw petitioner no.1 along with the victim girl while they left the village and the girl is still traceless. Thus I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail for petitioner no.1. The same is rejected. For petitioner no.2, it is submitted that she is wife of petitioner no.1. She has no concern with the case nor has any interest in kidnapping of a girl. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. - 2 - The petitioner no.2 namely Ruksana Khatoon shall be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in Sakra P.S.Case No. 193/2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI