THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.26445 OF 2006 ORAL ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material on record. Since, admittedly, the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order of cancellation of licence dated 17.10.2006 is pending before the 2nd respondent, without expressing any opinion on merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents not to implement the impugned order dated 23.11.2006, if not already implemented, till the application for stay filed by the petitioner is considered and decided by the 2nd respondent, on merits. There shall be a further direction to the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders in the application for stay, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order _____________ 20th December, 2006. (G. ROHINI, J.) kgr THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.26445 OF 2006 20th December, 2006. Between: R. Ramesh Naidu. .. Petitioner. And The Superintendent of Prohibition & Excise, Anantapur and others. .. Respondents.