1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4981 OF 2009 ( Satindersingh Primtamsingh Sethi -: versus :- Kiran Bhaskarrao Buty and others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 26, 2009. Heard Shri A.S. Jaiswal with Shri V.A. Bramhe, learned counsel for petitioner. Both the Courts have found that petitioner / original defendant no.2 is not tenant and respondents have stated that defendant no.1 was tenant and defendant no.1 has not entered witness box. Petitioner also accepted that he is staying at Bombay and business is looked after by one Jaichand, but said Jaichand has not been examined. It is therefore, apparent that the finding reached is a finding of fact and said cannot be labeled either as erroneous or perverse. No interference is called for in the impugned order. Writ Petition is therefore, dismissed. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.