IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45616 of 2009 ANIL KUMAR PANDIT @ ANIL KUMAR PANDEY, SON OF HARI PANDIT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 19/02/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 25(1-B) A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that earlier the Sessions Judge had given an observation to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after three months, despite which the next incumbent in his wisdom, refused bail to the petitioner, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 7.12.2008, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 372 of 2008 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)