1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 5194 of 2007 [Mah. State Co-op. Cotton Growers' Mktg. Federation Vs. PO, Labour Court, Buldana & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. S. Dhole, Advocate for the Petitioner. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI,J. DATE : 20th November,2007. 1. Heard. 2. In the application filed by respondent nos. 2 to 11 under Section 33 [C]-2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, the Labour Court has passed the impugned order. 3. The liability to pay wages, as prescribed under the provisions of Minimum Wages Act, is not in dispute. On this very ground, the impugned order cannot be faulted with. Had the employer given the details, the Court would not have been required to appoint a Commissioner for computation. 2 4. In these premises, the impugned order is not liable to be viewed as passed without jurisdiction or illegally. No interference is called for. Writ Petition is dismissed. Judge |Hedau|