& BEFORE THEJIQN'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR S^ KW, Sfs Srf^ ^ji .i IN THE MATTER OF MOHAN JUTE MILLS LTD., THROUGH ITS FACTORY MANAGER, SARANGARHROAD, RAIGARH.. VERSUS l.ALLAHUDDIN S/0 SHRI DUBBAR HAJI, R/0 BEfflND JUTE MILLS TR^NA, RAIGARH. 13^1 W.P.NO OF2006 PETITIONER ^ ,4 tV^ ..•••'ciii^, •^'Jesf'/^: .^'^' ?;.;tl. "» ^-y ^'.^./ '^"..^p" 2.THE CONTROLLING AUTHORITY, PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, OFFICE OF ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER, RAIPUR,(C.G) 3.THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY, PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, OFFICE OF DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, AVANTIVIHAR, faP'i':>:l<1 RAIPUR(C.G) .^-y /^^. ^^K /^^"' 4.COLLECTOR, ^fSry'V^) RAIGARH, <y- COLLECTORATE, RAIGARH Oy fc / o 5.TEHSILDAR, i;::^AIGARH, -<°'t%STRICTRAIGARH. l^l^ RESPONDENTS T^iy'PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION ;5 ©t-^DIAFOR THE ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPIUATE WRIT ORDER £ C5K DIRECTION AS DEEMED FIT. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BIL^SPUR Sin^e Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W. P^No.Jl351 OF 2006 Petitioner Respondents Versus Mohan Jute Mills Ltd. AUahauddiD. & others Shri Pradeep Saxseua, coi-uisel for the petitioner. Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Govemment Advocate for the respondents No. 4 and 5. ORAL ORDER (27"' March, 2006) 1. Leanied couiisel for the petitioner seeks perinission to withdraw the petition on fhe groiuid fhat the respondent No. 1 had died. 2. Accordingty, the writ petitfon is disniissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. ___——— Bablu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge