IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35024 of 2010 SANJAY MAHTO @ SANJU SON OF ARJUN MAHTO, R/O VILLAGE- AKUNA, P.S. SILAO, DISTRICT- NALANDA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5 17/03/2011 Heard Mr. Raj Kishore Prasad-1, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission is that the petitioner has been remanded in the present case on 26.5.2010 on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. There is nothing against him. Though the petitioner is not named in the FIR but there is no explanation as to why he has not been put on test identification parade. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M./concerned Court, Nawada in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 17 of 2010. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) avin