IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 201 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 95 OF 2010 SHRI PRASHANT GAONKAR ... Applicant Versus SHRI BALUDAS GAONKAR ... Respondent Mr. V. A. Lawande, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Sudin M. S. Usgaonkar, Advocate for Respondent. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 17th November, 2011 P.C. Heard Shri Lavande, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant and Shri Sudin Usgaonkar, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent. 2. By the impugned Judgment, the Lower Appellate Court has granted an injunction not to carry out any construction activity in the suit property nor to interfere therein. There is no dispute that a temporary injunction was in operation during the pendency of the suit before the Trial Court. On perusal of the photographs which are not disputed by both the Counsel, it appears that the disputed house is totally in a dilapidated condition and, as such, the question of any person residing therein does not arise at all. The Applicants cannot be permitted to change the status quo during the pendency of the above Appeal. Hence, no case is made out for interim relief and, as such, the application is dismissed. F. M. REIS, J. arp/*