w: 1 -k- ^l IN THE HlgH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATHSGARH) WRIT PETmON N0. 2-f^<03/2006. PETITIONER: ^k^- '^y';"^"..•-•"' ^/•"Q:.-^^-"' ....••••^"\>^" ^^^"' ^y ^' Respondents ) j- Teekam Singh Sinha, S/o Sone SingH' Sinha, aged about 42 years, Assist^it Teacher Govemment Kan'i./'g. Purv Madhyanuk Shala, Saja, Tahsil and Post Saja, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The' Secretary School Education Departinent Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur, CUhattisgarh. 2. Director of School Educatipn Officer^ D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The District Education Officer, Through" Pricipal Govemment Giris Higher Secondary School, Saja, Durg, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 QF THE CONSTrrUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI. PROHIBITION AND POR THE OTHER SIMILAR WRIT OR WRITS. ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETmONEg: f .-Xt.It&18_ XI-HC-78 HIHWI aWT% s^'sn^TRTO', giTflti'lis, !«fcira^< ^-^...^:^;.'?72T^y^ an^l'Ma'o ('i^t^si^'sT) 3nS?rw^iN? (iw^tergm^ ?f<lT8iK trf?a'Sd^T <til<lFi-t41.l tTfflcff if fScft rfsfRK ^arrf^tiTan^T 14-8-2006:- the Instrilictions AAr. Om P. Sahu/counselfor Mr. Sumesh 8ajaj, ©ovt. advance copy. Hear-d both the counset. The case of the petitioner i| since 2-9-1986 ond as per the of M.P. the Assistant Teachers examination on their* own expenses increments ond order of (Sovernmedt his B.T.I. exomination on his own effect is Annexure-P/5, but the (^e whereas, similorty situoted persons under* the orders of the Tribunal and Havir^ heard !earned counse! and circumstances of the case, iwth|o! tha case, the petitioner" is allowed ti^ copy of this petition raisin9 all hij period of 15 days from today anc^ examine the case of the petitione petftioner in this petition and in th^ reaches to the conclusion that simildr'l benefit of two advance increments petitioner. ^dvocate for" the State/respondents, on that he is working cs Assistant Teacher dated 24-12-98 issued by the State i((ho have passed B.T.I., B.Ed. and AA.Ed. otfter 22-10-64 are entitted for two advance is Annexure-P/1. The petitioner possed in the year 1995 and a certificate to thdt (^etitioner has not been given the benefit [isve been granted two advance increments this Court vide Annexure-P/6. for the parties, havin9 regard to the focts expressing-any opinion on the merit of 1'^ make a detailed repr'esentation along with grievances to respondent No.3 within a in turn, respondent No.3 is directed to in the tight of averments made by the representafion a!so. If respondent No.3 14'ly situoted persons hove been granted the the petitioner's cose is also covered for iwthlout dnd P.T.O. i* -V/ •O'l'd: a8pnfn •jap.40 sii^. j.o Ados p •j.o pssodsip spuo+s uoi+i+ad •MO| v^iM sauopjoaao w 'A»p04.uiojj. 0+ US^ 'JSpW S,+U31UU^3A09 J.O sisoq 94 81* Ifcbltp hiykM^ >1?+1»]'> piS) ^ (1-itllh l-y?Ujl?|tfc ^!+^33 joj. p3i4.j4.ua ajo ?aj4.j0cj 'plOSS^Oj.D UOj+SSJjp 3tj4. tj+j/^ si|l+uoui £40pojjad o uiq+m SMpJO SSDd UO S4.U81U3J3UI SSUOApO OMj. j.O 4.UDJ6 -s Ifcyha BajftVfclB+a DlUOg tfclltKS I^AK»IfciU <*>ll-b] I* I'^ltp 7 (JS!'t>bPjtA) U»Bhl^ll^ T-H. ./........, ..,....... 43lht|S IWhlh ''S-9-^-^-A'n ~~ •>'RrtlWb| 'S)ltf>[]liB 'h.Wlh.lh- |np 8Z.-3H-IX