HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR WRIT PETITION NO. 29953 of 2010 Between: Syed Mohd. Mahmod ………….Petitioners AND The Registrar, APAT, Hyd and others ………….Respondents HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR WRIT PETITION NO. 29953 OF 2010 ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 11-8-2010 passed in O.A.No.728 of 2005 by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad. The applicant-petitioner in OA.No.728 of 2005 states that he worked as Player-cum-Coach in the Sports Section of Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad and that he is qualified for promotion to the post of Inspector of Games and Sports on the basis of his merits. It is the case of the applicant that the Standing Committee of the Corporation passed resolution No.81 dated 19.1.2005 recommending the applicant for promotion to the post of Inspector of Games and Sports, the Commissioner did not implement the resolution of the Standing Committee. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the GHMC. It is noteworthy that it is not mandatory on the part of the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad to implement the resolution passed by the Standing Committee, as per provisions of section 679-A of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955, the Government may either suo moto or on representation of any counsellor, the Mayor or the Commissioner by order in writing cancel any resolution passed by the Standing Committee. In the present case the 2nd respondent- Commissioner wrote a letter to the Government requesting to cancel the resolution passed by the Standing Committee by exercising the powers under Section 699 of the Act and in the meanwhile the applicant retired from service. In the circumstances, no relief can be granted to the applicant. On the other hand, according to the respondents the applicant is at serial no.19 in the seniority list. Considering the circumstances, the Tribunal by its impugned order rightly dismissed the O.A. Hence, we do not see any merit in the writ petition. The Writ Petition fails and is dismissed. No costs. _______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J ____________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J DATE: 6-12-.2010 Kk/ HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR WRIT PETITION NO. 29553 OF 2010 6-12-2010