IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1723 of 2011 Date of Decision: 1.11.2011 Gram Panchayat village Muchrowal ....Petitioner. Versus Gurdev Singh Sidhu ...Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: None for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Sahu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. This Court while disposing of CWP No. 9882 of 2007 on July 6, 2007 had directed the respondent to look into the representations of the petitioner and see whether any action was required to be taken against respondents No.8 and 9 therein. It was further directed that in case any action was contemplated then the same be initiated within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of that order. The said order was not complied with by the respondent. Upon notice having been issued, reply by way of affidavit of the respondent has been filed. Along with the reply, order dated 24.10.2011 (Annexure R-1) has been appended in which it has been stated that on examination of the report, it is not being considered proper to take any action against respondents No.8 and 9 in the writ petition. COCP No. 1723 of 2011 -2- In view of the above, no further action is called for in the present contempt petition and the same is disposed of as such. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to take recourse to legal remedies to challenge order, Annexure R-1, in accordance with law. November 1, 2011 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE