IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARKHAND AT NAINITAL C-482 No.1023 of 2006 Kesav Gautam .……Applicant. Versus State of Uttaranchal and another …….….…..Respondents. Present: Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, Advocates for the applicant. Mr. Nandan Arya, AGA for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent no. 1. Mr. Anil Joshi, Advocate for respondent no. 2. Date of Decision: 13.9.2010 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J (Oral) 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Since the controversy involved in the present Criminal Misc. Application is the same as of Criminal Misc. Application No. 1036 of 2006 Shri Mahendra Kumar Agarwal Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others as it arises out of the same Case No. 84 of 2009 as in Criminal Misc. Application No. 1036 of 2006, this application is decided in the same terms as Criminal Misc. Application No. 1036 of 2006, which was decided on 13.9.2010. 3. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Court concerned for necessary compliance. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J) 13.9.2010 Rathour