SB Sales Tax Revision No. 75/2004 M/s Hindustan Pulvarising Mills Vs The ACTO, Ward 2 Anti Evasion Alwar 7.2.2008 Hon'ble Mr Justice Ashok Parihar Mr Alkesh Sharma – for petitioner Mr JM Saxena – for respondent BY THE COURT: After hearing learned counsel for the parties I have carefully gone through the material on record. The petitioner is mainly aggrieved by the order dated 16.9.2003 passed by the Tax Board as also the order dated 9.7.2004 passed by the Board rejecting the application for review filed by the petitioner. Since, after due consideration taking into factual aspects proper discretion has been used by the Board in passing both the impugned orders, in the facts and circumstances, no further interference is called for by this court. The revision petition is dismissed accordingly as having no merits. (Ashok Parihar) bnsharma