(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 11397 OF 2010 Shri Gyanoba s/o. Gangaram Gadhe. .. Petitioner. versus The State of Maharashtra, Department of Irrigation, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32, Through its Secretary, and 2 others. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. S.C. Yeramwar, Advocate, holding for Mr. A.S. Golegaonkar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos. 1 to 3. ........................ CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 20TH DECEMBER 2010 (2) COURT'S ORDER (Per R.M. Borde, J.) : 1. A complaint presented by the petitioner has been decided by the learned Member of the Industrial Court, Aurangabad, being Complaint (ULP) No. 18/1987, and certain directions were issued by the Industrial Court, in respect of award of promotion in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner is seeking directions for implementation of the order passed by the Industrial Court. 2. The petitioner has efficacious remedy of approaching the Industrial Court with a suitable request or by way of presenting an application for contempt in accordance with the provisions of law. In view of availability of alternate remedy available to the petitioner, for implementation of the orders passed by the Industrial Court, the directions, as sought for, by the petitioner in the petition, need not be issued. The petition is devoid of merit. 3. In the result, the petition is dismissed. ( R.M. BORDE ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp11397