spb/ 1 ca650-10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 650 OF 2010 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.(ST.) 32468 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. Avinash B. Avhad for the Applicants. Mr. A.P. Lavate for the Respondent. --- CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 01st FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C.:- 1 Heard learned counsel for the parties. By consent heard finally. 2 This is an application for condonation of delay of 340 days in filing of a Civil Revision Application. The applicant is a tenant against whom a suit was filed by the respondent- landlord for possession. It was partly decreed by the trial court. The applicant was directed to hand over possession of part of the suit premises to the respondent. Aggrieved by the spb/ 2 ca650-10 decision, both the applicant and respondent filed appeals in the appellate court. The appellate court dismissed both the appeals. The respondent thereafter filed the civil revision application, challenging the dismissal of his appeal. The applicant sought to raise cross- objection in the said Civil Revision Application, where doubts arose as to whether cross -objection can be filed in a civil revision application. In view thereof, the applicant has filed this revision application, challenging the partial decree of possession. 3 Considering the fact that the applicant was mis-led by filing of cross -objections in the civil revision application, in my view the delay can be condoned. Hence, the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). (D.G. KARNIK, J.)