IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 21st day of October, 2010 1st Bail application No. 926 of 2010 Order on the bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Uttam Singh … Applicant Vs State of Uttarakhand … Opposite Party --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arising out of Case Crime No. 04 of 2010 Under Sections 306, 120-B, 498-A, 323, 504 and 506 of I.P.C. Revenue Police Station Silari District Tehri Garhwal By the court Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Mangal Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the complainant and Sri Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the accused/applicant has submitted that the case rests upon circumstantial evidence and the chain of circumstances is not complete so as to connect the applicant with the said crime. He has further submitted that the applicant is in jail for more than one month and he is not having any criminal history. He also submitted that the applicant was at Gurgaon in service and was not present at Village Gairi Rajputon Ki Pati, Randarmoli, District Garhwal on the date of incident. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the papers available on record and without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 21.10.2010 ASWAL