IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 7TH OCTOBER 2010 / 15TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 30731 of 2010(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- SIVADAS .S/O.RAMAKRISHNAN, NAVANIODE HOUSE,SEKHARIPURAM,PUTHUR AMSOM, PALAKKAD-678 010. BY ADV. SRI.D.KRISHNA PRASAD SRI.D.NARENDRANATH SMT.O.K.SANTHA SMT.P.L.MARY TREASA RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEYS (RE-SURVEY),COLLECTORATE,PALAKKAD-678 001. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/10/2010, ALONG WITH WPC NOS. 30734 AND 30745/10, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NOs. 30731, 30734 & 30745 OF 2010 ============================== Dated this the 7th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners complaint is that there is a mistake in the resurvey number in the resurvey records. It is stated that seeking correction, they have submitted applications, copies of which are produced as Ext.P1 in these writ petitions. The grievance of the petitioners is that despite having made the applications, orders have not been passed by the respondent. It is in these circumstances requesting for an expeditious disposal of the applications, the writ petitions are filed. 2. Having regard to the case of the petitioners that Ext.P1 applications are pending before the respondent, without expressing anything on the merits of the claim raised and leaving it open entirely for the respondent to consider the issue, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent to pass orders on Ext.P1 application made by the respective petitioners with notice to them. Such orders shall be passed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of WPC Nos. 30731, 30734 & 30745 OF 2010 :2 : this judgment along with a copy of the writ petitions. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petitions before the respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp