IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Revision No. M-1526 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.7.2011. Sukhwinder Singh ….Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. M.S. Uppal, Advocate for the petitioner. NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL) This complainant’s revision is directed against the order dated April 18th, 2011 (Annexure P1) passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mansa, whereby evidence of the complainant was closed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that petitioner had to examine only two witnesses and both of them were officials of the Government Department. Summons were issued to them by the court but they did not appear. Bailable warrants were also issued against them but even then, they did not appear. Thereafter, warrants of arrest were issued against them as is evident from the interim orders dated August 3rd, 2009 and October 26th, 2009. Since the officials were summoned by the court and after service, they did not appear, the fault in not examining them was not of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also contended that he be given one opportunity to lead his evidence on his own responsibility. Considering the submission convincing, order dated April 18th, 2011 is set aside. Accordingly, petitioner is accorded one opportunity to lead his entire evidence on his own responsibility, on the date fixed. Disposed of. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 19.07.2011. Ishwar