IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2172 of 2011. Decided on: 21st April, 2011. Ranjeet Singh. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate, vice Mr. Surender Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG, for respondents No.1 and 2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved since he has been replaced by the third respondent, who is a contract teacher. According to the petitioner, there are vacant posts, where the 3rd respondent can be accommodated. In case the petitioner points out any such vacancy where the third respondent is willing to work and on such willingness being produced before the second respondent, appropriate action will be taken by the second respondent in that regard. In case the petitioner is otherwise eligible, he will be re-engaged and continued against such vacancy till he is otherwise replaced by a regular recruitee. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 21st April, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr) Judge. 2