IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1731 of 2008 DHARMNATH MISHRA & ORS Versus MOST.BACHIA & ORS ----------- 2 24.10.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioners. In the opinion of this Court, when amendment sought in the written statement is only clarificatory/explanatory in nature, the same could not have been refused by the Court below. From a bare reading of the amendment petition (Annexure-2) and the original written statement especially its paragraph no.8, it would be clear that the facts with regard to the previous litigation were already mentioned even in the original written statement, details whereof has been only given in the proposed amendment in the written statement. That be so, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order inasmuch as the same does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. This Court however, would make it clear that the petitioners will be at liberty to seek an opportunity for placing their rebuttal confined strictly to the amendment allowed in the written statement. With the aforesaid observations, this civil revision application is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)