IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI FRIDAY, THE 30TH OCTOBER 2009 / 8TH KARTHIKA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 144 of 2005 ---------------------------- OP.679/1995 of FAMILY COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS. ------------------------------------- 1. S.PUSHAPAVALLY, SARADA MANDIRAM, KONCHIRAVILA, MANACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. G.GOPAN, S/O.S.PUSHPAVALLY, SARADA MANDIRAM, KONCHIRAVILA, MANACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. G.PRASOBHAN, S/O.S.PUSHPAVALLY, SARADA MANDIRAM, KONCHIRAVILA, MANACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (MINOR). APPELLANTS 2 & 3 WERE MINORS AT THE TIME OF INSTITUTION OF THE OP. & 2ND APPELLANT HAS OBTAINED MAJORITY, 3RD RESPONDENT IS A MINOR IS REP. BY MOTHER & GUARDIAN IN THIS APPEAL BY ADV. SRI.R.S.KALKURA RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT. --------------------------- G.OGPI, ALAYIL VEEDU, PULINTHURUTHI, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== C.M. APPLICATION NO. 1110 OF 2005 & MAT APPEAL NO. 144 OF 2005 ============================ DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2009 ORDER/JUDGMENT Basant,J. The C.M. application is to condone the delay of 100 days in filing an appeal. When this petition came up hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners/appellants submits that the appellants have no instruction. We are not satisfied that the petition for condonation of delay deserves to be allowed. This petition is dismissed. Consequently, this Mat appeal shall stand rejected as barred by limitation. R. BASANT, JUDGE M.C. HARI RANI,JUDGE ks. WPC. 2