IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2011 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3727 of 2011() ------------------------------------- CC.NO.237/2010 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, THAMARASSERY .................... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED ----------------------------------------- 1. MUSTHAFA MALIK, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O. MOOSAKOYA, VARUVIL KAALAYIL HOUSE, KARAKKATTU, VALIYA PARAMBU, VAVATTU, PANANGADU, THAMARASSERY. 2. SUBAIDA, AGED 66 YEARS, W/O. MOOSAKOYA, VARUVIL KAALAYIL HOUSE, KARAKKATTU, VALIYA PARAMBU, VAVATTU, PANANGADU, THAMARASSERY. 3. ABDUL KALAM, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O. MOOSAKOYA, VARUVIL KAALAYIL HOUSE, KARAKKATTU, VALIYA PARAMBU, VAVATTU, PANANGADU, THAMARASSERY. BY ADV. SRI.JESWIN P.VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT --------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. SHABINA, AGED 25 YEARS, D/O. MAMMUKUTTY, THATTANKANDY HOUSE, ATHIYODI.P.O, KAYANNA, VATTACHIRA, KOYILANDI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.PIN-686 503 R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN R2 BY ADV. SMT.G.VIDYA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts CRMC.NO.3727/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE-A1- TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 84/2010 OF KODUVALLY POLICE STATION IN KOZHIKODE DISTRICT DATED 27/02/2010 ANNEXURE-A2- TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 21/10/2011 RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. ---------------------------------------------------- Crl.M.C.No.3727 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2011 Order The petitioners are the accused in CC No.237 of 2010 on the file of JFCM Court-I, Thamarassery. The offences alleged against them are under Sections 406 and 498A read with 34 IPC. The defacto complainant is the second respondent herein. She is represented by her counsel. The counsel on both sides would submit that the matter has been settled out of court and so further proceedings may be quashed. Since the dispute is purely personal and the parties have settled the dispute, this Crl.M.C. is allowed. The further proceedings in CC No.237 of 2010 on the file of JFCM Court-I, Thamarassery is quashed. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. srd 2 3