PEI 1' L IONER iN THE HIGH COURT OP IUDICATURE AT Bi‘LASI’UR f i‘ / ’CHHAmSGARH /Trilochan Das S/o. Shri MK. Das, Aged about 57 years, Head Clerk, Forest Department, Bastar, Forest Division, jagciaipur, District Bastar (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Though Secretary, Forest Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (CG) Principal, Chief Conservator of Forest, Raipur (CG) The Conservator of Forest Iagdalpur Circle, iagdaipur, Distt. Bastar (CG) Divisional Forest Officer, Bastar, Distt. lagdaipur (C.G.)’ Additional Forest Offieer, Sulqna, Forest Division, Sukma, Dislt. Da11tewada (CG) ' V. Balkrishnan, Head Clerk, Forest Division Sukma, Distt. Dantewada, At present address, Bastar, Forest Division, Jagdalpur, Distt. jagdalpur (CG) / WRIT I’ETYHGN UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA we. N0. é 741/ £2635 XI-HC—78 g; ' 9 Wm oow‘..oo1§.2.?‘o.c..o m 200$F WW<W> WWW WWW ‘ WWW mm§m€rmA %?af%w3n%31 10.3.2005 Shri Mano} Paranjape, counsel for the petitionert Shri ,Sandsep Dubciy‘. Govermnant Advocata for Q16 Sfate/ respondents 1 to 5. Heard on admission. Lean'md coun3€1 for the pstitionsr submits that this ordér of transfer (iated 26. 10.2094 'Was challengad in thC' earlier writ petition No. 4204/2004 in Which this Court has passed an order dated 1.12.2004 on me folloévi [lg terms : any opinion g case; in the opinion of this Court. ends of justice wili be sejired if a direction is given tO' zhe petitioner to .make a detailed representation raising his grievances before the competent authority of the respondents orden ' wiihin 15 days, representation being filed, the, competent authority of the respondents shalt decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible preferahly within two months from the date 'of receipt of the represemation. "' Thereafter, the petitio oer tiled a representation vide Annexure P— 7 on 14.12.2004. Refel‘i‘iiig; to Annexure F— 10, lealned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation of the petitioner has notbeen considered by the State Authoxity on melits and the same has been iismissed in a casual manner only, on the ground that the petitioner has been reheyedjggL’ (i “Having considered and without expressin on the merits of the along with a copy of the petition and this and on such mw,m,m XI-HC—78 mm ’ V A 2&0 mmaaiaaaa) 3min; ‘ . l v» mmm. > ~z~ I > WW§wW _ aamm‘ Jagdal‘pur on i0.11.2004 a 30102004. HE furtbaSubmits that in pumuancs of i116 order dated 1.12.2004, i116 conc€med aw nd his Successor has joined on ‘hon‘ty was required t0 decide the representation on its merits and not on the point that the petitioner has already been relieved. Leaxned‘counsel for the petitioner prays that this petition mayk be disposed of with adii ectionv to the competent authority, Special Secretary, State of Chhattisgarh, Forest Department, the ' authority who has decided the earlier representation, to consider the points on merits and to pass an order. This prayer is‘not oppose ‘1 by the State couns. The prayer is aliowed. It is directe‘d‘that the petitioner may file a copy of earlier representation alongwith the 1thority within 15 days from today and if such a representation is petition before the competent Val :o'py of this order‘ and the Writ filed, the competent authority wil take a decision on itas per the directions issued by this Court on 1.12.2004 in WP. No, 4204/ 2C O4 Within a-peiiod of one month from the date of filing of representation alongwith this order. L With the aforesaid ' direc‘ disposed of. ions, the petition stands finaily Consequently, M. (W.) P. No.- 509/ 2005 and LAND, 1297/2005 for urgent hearing also stand dispovsetiLogH ‘ Certified copy as per rules. 5d]— Sunil Kumar Sinha V Judge ,i =2 ‘ el l