1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No. 5445/2010 Sanjay @ Takaliya Versus State of Rajasthan & Others. Date of Order: 19.04.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain,J. Hon'ble Mr. Satya Prakash Pathak,J. Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Yadav, Government Advocate, for the State. BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner has preferred this parole writ petition for grant of second parole for 30 days under Rule 9 of Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958(for short 'the Rules of 1958'). From the impugned order dated 22.02.2010, Annexure-1, passed by District Parole Advisory Committee, Jhunjhunu, it is clear that parole application of the petitioner was dismissed as his record during jail custody was not satisfactory. As per Rule 9 of the Rules of 1958, it is one of the conditions for grant 2 of parole that conduct of petitioner during jail custody should be satisfactory. Since, the conduct of the petitioner is not satisfactory, therefore, we do not find any justified reason to allow the present writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed in limini. (Satya Prakash Pathak),J. (Narendra Kumar Jain),J. Manoj Item No.21.