IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1528 of 2010 Between: Shaik Mahaboob ... PETITIONER a n d Smt.Soghra Bhanu alias Tasleem and another … RESPONDENTS ORDER: The first respondent is wife of the petitioner. There is no dispute about relationship between them. There is also no dispute that both the parties are living separately from each other. The dispute raised by the petitioner’s counsel in this revision petition is regarding quantum of maintenance granted by the Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy district by order dated 17-07-2010 in M.C.No.389 of 2008. The lower Court granted maintenance @ Rs.3,000/- per month to the wife from the petitioner. 2. According to the first respondent, the petitioner is hiring his car at hi-tech city and earning Rs.20,000/- per month and that he is earning Rs.6,000/- per month towards rents from two houses and that he is carrying on real estate business on commission basis and earning Rs.10,000/- per month. Simply because no documentary evidence is produced to prove the same, it cannot be said that the petitioner has no income at all. 3. It is contended by the petitioner’s counsel that now the petitioner is doing some odd jobs after he lost his employment as driver and that therefore, he is not in a position to pay maintenance @ Rs.3,000/- per month. 4. Even a driver gets batta of Rs.250/- per day apart from his salary. After all, what was granted by the lower Court to the wife is @ Rs.100/- per day. I do not find the quantum of maintenance granted by the lower Court as excessive. 5. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed. _________________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J September 02, 2010. PN HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.1528 of 2010 September 02, 2010