W.P. No. 27(ss)06 Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard Sri M.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State/ respondents. Counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised by means of this writ petition has already been settled by this Court vide judgment and order dated 14th September 2005 passed in writ petition no. 1678(ss)2003 Km. Seema Chamola and three others vs. State of U.P. and two others, consequently the writ petition may be decided on the same terms and observations made in the aforesaid judgment. Keeping in view the above statement, the writ petition is finally disposed of on the same terms and conditions of the order passed by this Court on 14th September 2005 in writ petition no. 1678(ss)2003 Km. Seema Chamola and three others vs. State of U.P. and two others. (B.S. Verma, J.) 12.01.2006: NCM: