IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATtISGARH ATBILASPUR CR.M.P.NO. ?^-/'f°- OF Za&S Q|| APPLICATION UNDER SEGTION 482 OF THS-JCO&rOF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FOR OUASfiING OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT & FURTHER INVESTIGATION APPLICANT : Sandeep Maheshwari son of Late Shri ^ ..••f,-^' Gop'i Kishan Maheshwari, aged about <^:-<y'' „- >.?-'&'^'^'...•"" 28 years, R/o Ganjpara Durg Road, ^<^<^ J>-">x^ o^ Bemetara, District Durg, (C.G.) ....••-"'/A^:,^" \y VERSUS ^^^' RESPONDENT : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through - Police Station Ganj, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Radhey Gopal Agarwal S/o Late Shri Nand Lal Agarwal, aged about 58 years, resident of Telghani Naka, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) The above named applicant most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under:- ___ 1. That, the_aDnilca1 311^51 W M* '^f! SV^f »i+1!«^ *11*ICTI WNKtl 'S'SET •^iqid.ti,yal+l'Ko, fqdl'Hy ^..&:M:.^^1^0^ W1T5 TOiiwsfeisiitw S.B: HON'BLE JUSTICE MR, 09-02-2010: Shri Bhasker Pyasi, Shri Vaibhav Goverdhart, Shri Vibhash Tiwari, Appiicant Sandeep Mah|e Gopal Agarwal are present in Counsel forthe applicailt the F.l.R.dated 10.3.2009 they have settled thei.r dispi^t respondent No. 2 has no grii submits that complainant has| authorities for dropping the taken by the police authorities,| Counsel for the applica[ withdraw the present petlti application before She authority may be directed to Counsel for the Statel application is filed by the part| however submits that accordance with law. In the facts & ci to withdraw the petition with th( =bHf<rl41'f TTR^ff "^f 'f^si' <f^lt$l< ^aifiCTSll^r coujisei for the appiicant. |, PL for the State/respondent No.1. coUnsel for the respondent No. 2. Vlah|eshwari and respondent No. 2 Radhey jjierson before the Court. submits that subsequent to lodging of [•espondent No. 2 against the applicant, ispi^te outside the Court and as on date ie^ance against the applicant. He further already made a request to the pollce m^tter on 9.9.2009 but no action has been ijit submit that he may be permitted to with llberty to move appropriate comtietent authority and the competent (tn ta|<e appropriate steps. has no objection if the appropriate |es before the competent authority. He com^etent authority wil! act strictly in ircumstajices of the case, applicant is permitted ^ aforesaid liberty. 3^ '-HC—78 ^sf "^i^id^, siTily'Ko, fsldwy.'f. Nl*<dl **<l<t»-•••-•••-••-•••••- •••••--••^F^200 an^T'T?^ (ip^q^?) an^i W R-fift wi aii^i anw &F ¥^(tW^lftd-CT^I —•2-' !n the eventuaiity of filing and the respondent NQ. 2, the Authority concerned in accordan^e by any observation made by this Q Accordingly, the petition i^ libertv as aforesaid. ^Pl^T4H t?W?ff "^f t^St' <f^ $K ^TsiRiHsn^i such appiication by the appllcant same may be acted upon by the e with law'without being influenced ;oy4. > dismlssed as withdraw with the Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge -•'\ ifiBKiBC,'