IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2011/1ST POUSHA 1933 WPC.No. 28142 of 2011 (P) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S) : --------------------- A.K.PAVITHRAN, ANTI MALARIA WORKER, 3RD CIRCLE, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S) : ------------------------ 1. CORPORATION OF KOZHIKODE, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, KOZHIKODE - 673 001. 2. THE SECRETARY, KOZHIKODE CORPORATION, KOZHIKODE - 673 001. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.SHAIJ RAJ. BY SRI.P.V.SURENDRANATH BY SRI.K.D.BABU,SC,KOZHIKODE CORPORATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-12-2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AMV WPC.No. 28142 of 2011 (P) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS : EXT.P1. : COPY OF JUDGMENT IN O.P.1616/95 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXT.P2. : COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 19.12.2001. EXT.P3. : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SENT BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 28.11.2009. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE AMV K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.28142 of 2011. = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 22nd December, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is an Anti Malaria Worker under the first respondent Corporation. He had initially entered the service of the second respondent on 14.8.1989 and had worked for one year on provisional basis. Thereafter, his appointment was extended and he continued for five years without interruption. His complaint is that even after his regularisation he has not been granted the benefit of the provisional service that he has put in prior to his regularisation. According to him, his increments for the period from 7.9.1989 to 26.3.1994 have not been given to him. The petitioner has submitted Ext.P3 representation setting out his grievances, which is pending before the second respondent. He seeks the issue of appropriate directions for the consideration and disposal of Ext.P3. WP(C).No.28142/2011. 2 2. In view of the fact that Ext.P3 representation is pending consideration of the second respondent, I am satisfied that this writ petition can be disposed of directing the said respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation. 3. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, evidenced herein by Ext.P3, in accordance with law and in the light of Ext.P2 and to pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, (Judge) Kvs/-