-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.1323 OF 1988 APPEAL NO.1323 OF 1988 APPEAL NO.1323 OF 1988 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: JULY 21, 2006. JULY 21, 2006. JULY 21, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Singh for the Appellant. The Appellant is the insurer of the vehicle allegedly involved in the accident. The Claimant in the Claim Petition under section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 filed an application under section 92-A of the said Act for grant of compensation on account of no fault liability. The said application was allowed by the Tribunal. An application was made by the Appellant-Insurance Company for setting aside the order passed under section 92-A of the said Act. The said application has been dismissed on 13th June 1989. The Appeal has been preferred for challenging the said order dated 13th June 1989. Appeal against the -2- said order is not maintainable. Hence, Appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. 2. The amount deposited in compliance with section 92-A of the said Act in this Court will be transferred to the concerned Tribunal. The concerned Tribunal will pass an appropriate order regarding disbursement of the said amount. Judge. Judge. Judge.