IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40510 of 2009 MD.MUMTAZ, Son of Azizur Rahman, R/o Mohalla – Madhopur, P.S. Tajpur, District Samastipur …… Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ….. Opp. Party For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, A.P.P. ----- 2 26.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the first information report and he belongs to the same village to which the informant belongs. He, though, has not been named in the first information report but surprisingly had been identified in T.I. parade. It is stated that the petitioner has clean antecedent. Learned counsel for the State submitted that the petitioner has been identified in T.I. parade and it is apparent from the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Samastipur, vide order dated 8.10.2009 rejecting his prayer for bail of this petitioner that upon his confession looted money, mobile phone and bomb were recovered. In that view of the matter since petitioner has been identified in T.I. parade and his confession before the police led to the recovery of looted articles and bomb also, I am not inclined to grant bail to this petitioner. This application is dismissed at this stage. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)