..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.21 OF 2007 1.Prakash Ignesh D’Souza, & 2.Ignes Ilar D’Souza. ...Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents. .... Mr.B.G.Tangsali, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP, for the State. Mr.Erik Pascal Mathayas, respondent No.2 present in-person. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 18th April, 2007. DATED : 18th April, 2007. DATED : 18th April, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Petitioners-orig.accused Nos.1 & 2, the learned APP for the State and respondent No.2-orig.complainant Mr.Erik Pascal Mathayas, who is present in-person. 2. On last occasion, respondent No.2-orig.complainant was allowed to withdraw an amount of Rs.75,000/- deposited by the petitioners before the trial Court as well as compensation awarded to him of Rs.8,000/-. 3. It is stated that respondent No.2-orig.complainant has withdrawn the said amount ..(2).. of Rs.75,000/- as well as compensation amount of Rs.8,000/-. In addition thereto, today the applicants have brought cash of Rs.5,000/-, which is handed over to the complainant. 4. In view of this fact, both the parties prayed that permission may be given to compound the offence. Permission is granted. Offence is allowed to be compounded. 5. Revision Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)