IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20511 of 2010 1. MD.YUSUF 2. Md. Yunus Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Considering that the main allegations under Sections 323, 376 and 511 of the Penal Code is against petitioner no. 1, this Court is not persuaded to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail only on the submission that there was a one month delay in lodging of the same. The application is rejected with regard to him. Petitioner no. 2 is alleged to have freed petitioner no. 1, after he was apprehended. Let petitioner no. 2 namely Md. Yunus, surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Saraiya (Jaitpur) P.S. Case No. 17/2010, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)