ngle aench :w) i l ‘ S B (Serv1ce Matter) i i ‘ \ \ i IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT l i BILASPUR (CHHAT’DISGARH) M$¥Q200 WRIT PETITIOMS) No. PETITIONER Ajy Smgh, son of Shn Sdar Smgh a un aged about 5yyears workmg as Ware House eeper (Godam Keeper) in Forest Department, Durg Area, residence of Shiksha‘k Nagar, Gali No.2, Q.No’. 89, Durg’, Tahsil and District Durgi, Chhattisgarh. versus / Respondents 1. State of Chhattlsgarh through Secretary Department of Forest Dau Kalyan Smgh Bhawan, /Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Chief Forest Conservator, Raipur, , Ch’hattisgarh. 3. Forest‘COnse'rvat’or, Durg Forest r Circle, Durg, District Durg, /Chhattisga;rh. 4. Forest Officer, Durg Forest Area, Durg, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITIONUNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ’7 Si i 1 9 /A ww,mimw ‘ ,k “WEI \ Wnl$ . W9I§2m437¢/% 200 ' ‘mm(1aiga§u) mmm IWW @W 1 $ai1=cmm S.B: Hon’ble Justice Mr. Pritinkgr DiWaker 20-08-2009: Shri Jitendra Gupta, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh Tha<ur, Dy. Advocate General for the State. Counsel for the petitioner submits that as after filing of the petition impugned transfer order has been cancelled, therefore the petition has become infructuous. Dla Accordingly the Writ petiticn is dismissed as having become infructuous. SdL / \': Pritinker mWaker' \V.” ,Judge v