^.—^--.^•—•-.^-.--XY cp 5^_'JHB_HISH COGS-.C OP CEH& T2; SGA iRH s BIIAgEiyt W.P.KO. ^?<An /2ooi 'u PSEL^OH IBiQ5B_AB'a:_CL]Ss £26 ANO 22? O? IHS coNaa^EiTiQS OF IEQJ&. wa. issa&scB OF A UBI;BL QF GSBIIOa B;. mKQ&ias_B'.EG. A.SD. FOB .ISSUAHCS o£l££ aoEasA.is mjafflOH_Aj<a os®is« •?£wJ^. a^-IOA& PBII2IQ R s PeshiOas Galkwad aged about 22 years S/o Bhaddulal Galkwad, Ouruji at E.fl.s. Center, Saiaipara q/o feraipara Gram Eanetiyat rendri Sb.laUMorte) Iebsil.Il oEmi, Ba.stt.Bilaspur - Versus - BlSa'OItC'ia'rrs :/;1. Sta-te of Ghfaattisgirh 'Baiough Deptt. of rancfayat Mant.rala,ya, Shas-fcn Ghowk, Kiipur(C'gari3), ^2. Chief BxecuUve Officer, J'anpad Panchya-t, Larml Bistt.. 3.1.1a spur( C' ^, A) . flesails of tfae petitl.oa» 1) eAfflICDIABS CF £HE; PB£I.tIOI»Sa; As per cause ci.tle. 2) PARi:IGOL^aa.i5£'_.CBS ^SS&^SSs. As per cause Ettle. - |1: m '» ' "I S^aBST^S!" •:!':;j""< trauiiii,'"v^y.^ •ssAistf-^yv VsW •^^':- P!te~'K""§Stes ^'^ :!!:StK5S»3 l-.~-i.-<-.-r4?-i HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH W BIU\SPUEt (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) W.P.No. 220 of 2001 - Petitioner Pesh! DasGalkwad ^ * VERSUS Respondent State op Chtattlsgarh and aff&ther Present: , Stiri Ajay Mislira, counsel for petitlon^ ; Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. A.G for the State/respondent No.1, : :„ :~; ^ . "/",:" Shri Goutam Bhaduri, counsel for respondent No.2 OROER — '.•*,• <05.12.2011) Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that afterfiling of the petition, the petitioner has beenappointedas-Shiksha Karmi and therefore, nothing survives in the petition for adjudication and as such the petition has become infruetuous: 2. Accordlngty, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. In wew of the above, M.W.P. stay stands disposed of. No.130/2001 for vaeating^ Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker juiige Priya 1