THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY C.R.P.No.787 OF 2009 ORDER: This revision is filed against the orders of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Kothagudem, in I.A.No.1530 of 2008 in O.S.No.371 of 2006 dated 23.01.2009. 2. Heard. 3. A petition filed under Order 26 Rules 9 and 10 read with Section 151 C.P.C. for appointment of Commissioner to measure ‘A’ and ‘C’ schedule property and note the physical features with reference to registered documents etc., was dismissed by the Court below holding that the same amounts to collection of evidence relying on a decision of this Court reported in TAPPETA ESWARAMMA v. G.NAGABHUSHANAM[1], where the request was to decide as to which suvey number the disputed property was situated, the facts are not at all applicable to the present case, where the petition is to measure the property with reference to documents and physical extents. 4. Inspite of service, the respondents did not appear. 5. In the circumstances, the civil revision petition is allowed and accordingly, I.A.No.1530 of 2008 in O.S.No.371 of 2006 stands allowed. No costs. The commissioner shall note only the dimentions of the properties and note the structures existing in the properties. ___________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. 10th August 2009 Rns [1] 2008(1) APLJ 181(HC)