IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-21148 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 25, 2011 Shiv Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, A.A.G., Haryana, for the respondent-State. Mr. G.B.S. Dhillon, Advocate, for the complainant. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 82 dated 08.06.2010, under Sections 406, 498- A, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Kalayat, District Kaithal. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that although petitioner is present in the Court compound, CRM M-21448 of 2010 however, petitioner has refused to remain present in this Court in compliance of order dated 18.03.2011. Petitioner has not paid Rs.5,000/- to the complainant in compliance of order dated 18.03.2011 nor petitioner is present in the Court Room and has denied to remain present in the Court as stated by Ld. Counsel for the petitioner, therefore, petitioner does not deserve any sympathy. Discretionary relief of anticipatory bail can be granted to those who have respect in the Court and judicial system. Petition is dismissed. Interim order granted on 26.07.2010 stands cancelled. March 25, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2