GH COIJRT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 6538 of2007 PETITIONER S.G..^nsari, S/o Sbri Md. Yakub, Aged about 60 years, Village & PO : Mai-wahi, The. : Pendra Road, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Heaitli & Faiaily Welfare, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawai-i, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Directorate of HeaWi Serviees, Govt. of Clihattisgaili, D.K.S. Bhawati, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Cliief Medical & Healtii Officer, Bilasour, Distt. Bilaspur CC.G.) WRIT PETinON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmmQNQFINDIA SB: Hon'bleSIm Satish K. Agnitiotri, J. ^l Present: Shri P.S.Koshy, Advocate forthe petitioner. Miss Sunita Jaia, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondents. (Passed on 17 day of January, 2Q08) The petition.er, by vyay ofthis petition seeks a direction to the respondents to grant extension of service period ofthe petitioner for two yeara. Accordmgto the leamed eoiuffieS for the petitioner, order has already been passed on 05.09.2007 extendingfhe age ofsuperannuation. 0n perosal of fhe communication dated 05.09.2007 (Annexiu-e P/2), it appears that the communication is only for takina appropriate action, not for srantine any eriension. The petitioner has not made out a case for ff'axit of extension of service period. There is no merit in this case. Accordmgly, the petition is dismissed. However, ifthe State Government has already taken aay decision to extand the service period offhe petitioner, that may be considered and flie order may be issued before the petitioner reaches tke age ofsuperannuation. Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge Amit