SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.292 OF 2010 Smt. Guldagad S. Shivaji ...Petitioner. v. The State & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. V.K.Bodhar i/by Mr. A.M.Joshi ,advs. For the Petitioner. Mr. S.V.Pitre ,adv. For the Respondent Nos.4 and 5. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : JULY 21, 2011. P.C. 1 The present petitioner had withdrawn writ petition no.4857 of 2009 on 15th December, 2009 with liberty to make representation to the management and demand salary for a period for which according to the petitioner she has not been paid salary. Division Bench directed that if such representation is made to the management, the management shall consider it in accordance with law and gives its reply to the petitioner within a period of four weeks and the petitioner thereafter would be free to adopt appropriate remedy that would be available to the petitioner against the stand taken by the management. The learned counsel for the respondents points out that though there was delay in deciding the representation, that representation has been finally decided and as the management has rejected the claim of the petitioner, petitioner had also preferred an appeal against dismissal. That appeal was also dismissed. In - 2 - these circumstances, I find no substance to take action for the contempt. 2 In the result, petition stands dismissed. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)