IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1650 of 2010 1. HARIBANSH TIWARI 2. KRISHNA DEVI @ KISUN DEVI -------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 6.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that undoubtedly the death is premature but torture for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry soon before death is also lacking, apart from no eyewitness of the occurrence. If really the deceased was killed specific assertion has been made in the F.I.R. that for the last time the deceased went to her matrimonial house, receiving information by her mother-in-law that her father-in-law fell ill and at that time there was no grievance. It was really prevailing soon before death. Further submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that really the deceased was suffering from some ailment and witnesses are there to state that she died of her ailment. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above 2 named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in Dinara (Bhans) P.S. Case No. 198/09, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)