IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7906 of 2009 1. SHAILESH KUMAR, SON OF LATE RAGHUNATH PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE VIDYADHAR P.S. KHAGARIA, DISTRICT KHAGARIA. 2. MD. KAFIL AHMAD, SON OF MD. FARZAND ALI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE REWAHI GOHATI, POST- KANHAULI, DISTRICT- ARARIA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. JOINT SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM,GOVT.OF BIHAR PATNA. 4. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SUPAUL. 5. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 6. DY. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 7. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. ----------- 2. 14.7.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners were applicant pursuant to Advertisement no.9/98 issued by the Bihar Public Service Commission, Patna. They were appointed on the post of Assistant in the Collectorate, Supaul on 23.1.2004. They have filed this writ application for a direction to the State-respondents to consider their case for grant of revised pay- scale of Rs.4000-6000/, as according to them other similarly situate persons had approached this Court in C.W.J.C. No.13577 of - 2 - 2006 for similar relief, which was allowed under orders dated 17.12.2007, Annexure-4 series to this application, against which the State-respondents preferred L.P.A. No.522 of 2008, which was dismissed under order dated 29.9.2008. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that their case is also covered by the aforesaid two orders dated 17.12.2007 (Annexure-4 series) and 29.9.2008. 4. Raising the aforesaid grievance, let the petitioners file representation before the District Magistrate concerned, who should consider and dispose of the same in the light of the aforesaid two orders dated 17.12.2007 (Annexure-3 series) and 29.9.2008 by passing appropriate reasoned order in accordance with law as early as possible, in any case within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. In the event, representation is allowed, it goes without saying that petitioners be allowed the consequential benefit. 5. This writ application is, - 3 - N.H./ accordingly, disposed of. ( V.N. Sinha,J.)