?- lt,/ ®ii!i^ KW W9' rf T?[ ii"T ^ar $rarr?rFi? srfsRTw ^i^'rte', TpTgT ./">.*_ _ • Eirr?E v^, ^qT^T^ri ?@TW ^ SiT^I yii^-^~~!)/2000 (j,^^)^'^^^" i^4J ? ftqTifr - g.Tt-.- El7qT(ft~,-^TqT - ^TSITT, ^e€{^^ 1:^(TT - ?Tl~TOT OT^S? is-s-s oi. D.^r. mw\ srrr - ?rra4 'rarci 'fqsrr1!, 3TtqTi?T ^Oy0| 02.^-ffsi^T'vT^ ^sr i^ B^'n'ftg 2 Tioyo ?rf?fr rte T?n-^WT |lt0g'0| 464 002 92. g'o^ "fiirrfwTrt' E^.st. 'SiTB? / rigfft-PI Eft- fijPiT - ^i-^T 04. ST^IT^, 3Tr?RflT?r JSwf? T[TE--q1t}cp TmrTtTO ?TcMT, r1B(frn ^t- •f^rTT - q^-^T . . • SCTT^WT ST^, q?l 3l'ri4c! qm- 19 jCTTcTf^ Srf'eRTW 3Tf'Erfe|II 1985. ./".& >>: "&KtS& y tHC-22 <y ^ 311^1^1 3n^y ^<-ii^ y[5fl -S^ ^i||^](-|i|, ®Tll<1'l<o,(»ICII+!1< sf^f ira^? \)J^^^:.'!>'>A'>1 -^ 200 S WRWgrlTliR 1^6^' 31)^1 ^R'IWa^d SB : Hpn'bleShri Manindra Mohbn Shrivastava, J 10.03.2010: Shri S. V. Purohit, counsel Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawy4 Heard. The present petition arise^ amount payable to the petitioner fri|)m f|?r the petitioner. tr fbr the State. In the return filed by the adjustments were made from the ( made by the petitioner from his G. resjsondents, On the other hand, learnec) those adjustments were not correj: that while making adjustment reoiji also been included. Learned cout matter may be referred to the Pen^ion This Court, inW.P.No.- Chhattisgarh & others) and Committee to consider the matter facts were involved. The Government, pursuant to the W.P.No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bs Chhattisgarh and others), and 01 No. 105 of 2008 (State of ChhattiS! another). Thus, this petition is *l'>lt<'l<fl-t llldT'? ISIA <fa^l< ^; aifSgii aii^i iri' on account of dispute with regard to his G.P.F. aooount. it has been stated that certain .P.F. account on account ofwithdrawals '. F. account from time to time. counsel for the petitioner submits that st and has made statement to oonterid iveries made from other accounts have isel for the petitioner submits that the Committee. 464^2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of oljher connected matters, directed the ^ retriat dues as the disputed question of Com|nittee was constituted by the State order dated 19-06-2006 passed in i|i Chandrakar Vs. State Government of ifderdated 13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. ^arh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandaland sqL<arely covered by the judgment and order r^ vo^ - -..T.-S.'"^*1—- ..••*^>^ lxi-HC-22 i0S STI^T'qiT r^i* sii§?[ ^HN7'?Tt?cT .(. ^-ST ^ll^lirl2!, wAvid. hwwy. ^-_j^^^^-SL WHVll sblKt) ~ /H-I 200 f^^I' sn^i ^Rirar •gfttt 1- dated 31st January, 2008 passed j (supra) as submitted by learned iltl oourtsel ortler, This petition is accordingly dij the offioe of the Advocate General is Committee, within a period of 15 days|from of this order. Thereafter, the Comrtiittee petitioner and officers concerned withi(i Committee shall consider and pass affording proper opportunity of hearin^ and the officers concerned may file acjditiona The entire exercise, inoluding paym^nt petitjoner, be completed within a periotd receipt of a copy ofthis order. The petitioner shall supply the State counsel as well as counsel transferring the same to the Committe^- orte °bl<ll<ri<il-1 •WRff 1} •fe^t ifa^K ^? STfitfT SI^f W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal appearing for the parties. iposed of in the same terms i.e., directed to send the case to the the date of reoeipt of a oopy shall issue notice to the a furi:her period of 15 days. The jer, in acoordance with law, after to the petitioner. The petitioner documents, ifnecessary. of retiral dues, if any, to the of four months from the date of complete set of the petition to for the Acoountant General for ^a^Ata^d^ ^.<.^"t a^a