Crl. Misc No. M 30 OF 2011 ****** Raju @ Gyani vs State of Haryana Present : Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmohan Sikka, DAG Haryana ******* The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in case FIR No.367, dated 5.10.2010, registered under Sections 376/506 of the IPC and Section 3 of the SC & ST Act, at Police Station Mohindergarh, District Mohindergarh. Counsel for the petitioner has argued that it is clearly a case of consensual sex because there is no injury reported either on the person of prosecutrix or on the petitioner. Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from HC Ashok Kumar, has accepted the fact that there is no external injury found either on the person of the prosecutrix or on the petitioner. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the controversy, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner. Bail to the satisfaction of C.J.M/D.M, Narnaul. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) February 11, 2011. JUDGE `kk'