In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRM-M No.6287 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 05.04.2011 Amardeep Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Amol Rattan Sidhu, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vishal Deep Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Bhavna Gupta, D.A.G., Punjab for the State. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). This is an application seeking regular bail in case FIR No.143 dated 16.8.2010 under Sections 302/307/148/149/341/120-B IPC and Sections 25/29 of Arms Act (Section 27 of Arms Act added later on), P.S. Sunam, District Sangrur. This Court on 3.3.2011 has passed the following order:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has not been named in the FIR. Identification parade was held on the application of the petitioner on 14.10.2010 in which petitioner was not identified by the said eye witness.” Learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab on the instructions of HC Major Singh has vehemently argued that in the prior identification parade, petitioner was identified and therefore, non- identification on 14.10.2010 shall make no difference. Undisputedly, petitioner was not identified in the identification parade on 14.10.2010 on the application of the petitioner. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 05.04.2011 sk.