HIGH COURT GF CHHATTISGARH, BILA$FUR WP. {C} No. 1438f201fi ‘v‘v‘RjiPETiTiON UNDER ARWCLE 227 0f" THE C3NST1TUTION OF 1NDIA Mr. Sanjay Patet Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Sao; Govt. Advocate for respondents 1 & 2. ORAL GRBER {18.03.2m 1) SUML KUMAR SENHA,J. Heard on adi’nission. Petitioner—Gram Panchayat Sai‘agbundiya has fiied this Wot peimon chauenging the vaiid§ty of 2 notifications issued under Sections 4 & 6 of The Land Acquisition Act, 18%. 1t has also prayed for quashment of entire proceedings of Land Acquisition Case No. 74431'3-82I’Bhwarjani’2O‘nO. Admittediy, the Gram Panchayat is not the owner of the iand in quesiion. No reasons have been assigned in the writ petition that how ihe Grarn Panchayai wouid be affeoten‘ 'oy the proposed acquisition for which the above notices under 3ection 4 & 6 have been pubiished by the coriipeient Authorities. Even, no resoiution of the Panchayat has been fiied to show that the person whose land are PETIT‘GNER Gram Panchayai Saragbu‘ndiya, ‘ Janpad Panchayat—Kartala, Distt.- Karba (06.) Through- its Sarpanch $uresh Kumar Ss/o Shri Maniram. Aged« 38 years, R/o Vil!age- Sargbundiya, Distt. -— Korba (C.G.) VERSUS RE5PGNQENTS 1. $tate of Chhatmgarh T‘nrcugh- Secretary‘ Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. CoHectorl Lamd Acquisitiom Officer, ‘ Korba, Disttv— Korba (C,G.) 3. Lance Power Want, Through- its Managing Director, 50-M, Shantipath, Managing Gate No. 3, Niti Marg- Chank‘yapuri, NewDelhi. ‘ jL n L WP. (C) No. 1439;2'611 propOSed to be acquired have approach the Gram Panchayat and the Pamchayat has resoweo‘ to fiie such peiition before the High Court m ‘ In the above facts ahd circumstances of the case, ILaf the’erginwh ihat the petitioner Gram Panchayat has no locus—sfandi to file this wrii petition in present form on the grounds projected in the writ petition. For the foregoing reasons, the writ petition is dismiseed summarily. No order ao to cost. _.,._. vv.