IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 18TH DECEMBER 2008 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 37550 of 2008(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SAJITH P,S/O.SIVADASAN, AGED 35 YEARS, SAJI NIVAS, PULLOOR , WANDOOR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.SHIBILI NAHA SMT.A.LOWSY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, NILAMBUR,. 2. ASST. ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, WANDOOR. 3. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY LICENSING BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI. P.P. THAJUDEEN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 37550 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 18th December, 2008. J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext. P4 show cause notice by which the petitioner was directed to show cause why the licence to carry out the electrical installation works as per Ext. P1 should not be cancelled for the reasons mentioned therein. I am not inclined to interfere with Ext. P4 in so far as it is only a show cause notice. In fact, the petitioner has filed Ext. P5 reply to the show cause notice also. Therefore, it is for the 1st respondent to consider Ext. P5 and pass appropriate orders pursuant to Ext. P4 in accordance with law. Such decision shall be taken as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.