IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.23260 of 2011 Date of Decision. 14.12.2011 Ajay Dhaneshwar, Proprietor, Dhaneshwar Products Engineers .....Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Pankaj Maini, Adocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner's claim is that in respect of goods supplied, the respondent has only given the principal after making some unauthorized cuts and that too after a writ petition was filed and followed up with contempt application. I find from the terms of the contract under which he made the supplies that there is a provision for arbitration. The tenability of the decision to impose some cuts and non payment of interest for the amount, which was due to the petitioner, shall be an issue for an arbitral process and it need not be detained before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. 2. The writ petition is dismissed but with liberty to have a recourse through arbitral process in the manner contemplated in the contract. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 14, 2011 Pankaj*