BEFORE THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT (ytfuDICATURE AT CHHATTISGARH AT BJLA§?UR(C.G.) IN THE MATTER OF W.P. N0; ^/2001 Between •ETmONER: - ^F.L. Kripal, aged about 43 years, S/o. Shri. S.R. Kripal, Disto?ct Registrar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) resident of 10, Changorabhata, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). RESPONDENTS: - 1. u/' >^rf:^ .^w >^% .< •< - ." \* :^'^A' -/<.• A'-r<?- ^^y' ^sc^' .v SL 2. t^ ^' ^' 3. ^ 4. Vs. State ofChhattisgarh, through Principal Secretary, General Administrative Department, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). State of Madhya Pradesh, through Principal Secretary, General Administrative Department(State Re-organisation Cell) Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal( Madhya Pradesh). Secretary, State ofChhattisgarh, Ministry ofCommercial Tax, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). Secretary, State ofMadhya Pradesh, Ministry ofCommercial Tax, Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. Inspector General ofRegistration and Superintendent ofStamps, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). (^ 6. ^ 7. ^ Inspector General ofRegistration and.Superintendent of Stamps, "Panjiyan Bhawan", Near Old Vidhan Sabha House, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh). President, State Advisory Board, State Re-organiwtion Cell, Vallabh Bhawan, Mantralaya, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh). ,/•'..'' frETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE ^" coNSTmjnoN OF ENDIA. gner respec' Isaboi [spre' jlctio' ffle' feari Se le XZ-HC-22. •l«~ali --''.. . ^ (^ ^ ^. ^" ~s^ ^WRra, ^^•yii.s, is!cii'«>i.< SiT^^iI f?;!W3n|?[ 'sinff=IT ^lfttT il: ./ .^.•..£:...K.!?.;...\3..6^/2'<:oi. sn^i'Rgiwgf?(r courisel writ 23/07/2003 None for fhe petitionei^ Shri D.R.Agarwal, Dyj Shri S.S. Rajput, Prayer in fhis respondent/Stete of M.P. Depuly luspector Genersjl Cbhatttsgarh aud for restr^: impleinentmg Aruiexure A-5.| It was the petitioner's) wffl disturb thc ratio, When fhe aiatter had pelitiol^er by the leamed coiuisel apprehension of fhe been proiuoted to the (Registeation). Counsel obtain uistructions. But, whi for the petitioner. q)i^<ri-4li 'W^f ^ t^st TF^^R ^..G. for the respondents no. 1,3 & 5. for fhe respondents no.2,4,6 & 7. petition is for restranung the p'oiu creatmg fh.e additional post of (Regtetration) ia the State of itr^iumg it finm takmg auy action for case that if a new post is created, it Ipojse up on 25/06/2003, itwas sated for the State of M.P. fhat the apgeanng did not suryive as he had already post of Deputy Inspector General fi]>r tbe petitioner had sought tiine to ;n the niatter is called, no one appears ['m^^Rgo S -yaf^n'n^pt, ^tfrOT®,facii'yy a-si^t^l fs?:ri?;3ii^i i<^ yf? sn^i TKiiWfffl^ -2- 4>l-4^^l H <?tf ^ fttStL <?^tri.i< ^; aifigiT 3n^l ^fr. In view offhe stateuient inad^ by the leamed coiuisel for fbe State that no cause of action survjlves as the petitioner has been proinoted, fhe writ petition stands disposed of as having becoine ittfi'uctuous. In case there rein^ias auy cause of actiou, fhe petitioner shaU be at liberty to m.ov^ a fresh petition'br to revive tbsSi petition. In view of the above, M.W.FJ.NO. 1577/2002, 334/2003 for vacatmg the stay and I.A.No. 7915|/2002 and 853/203 for ui^ent hearuig also staad disposed of. Sd/- P.C. Naik Judge