1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 679/2008 (The Headmaster, Mahalaxmi Vidyalaya & anr. Vs. The One Member Grievance Committee for Entertaining Complaints of Shikshan Sevaks & ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM :D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 16, 2008. Heard Mr. Gordey for the petitioners. Writ petition is directed against the order passed by the Grievance Committee dated 24/3/2006 whereby the Grievance Committee has held that the respondent no.2 who has completed period of three years as Shikshan Sevak and, therefore, as per Clauses 7 and 8 of the Government Resolution dated 13/10/2000, the respondent no. 2 can be declared as regular Assistant Teacher and cannot be removed from service, nor can be declared as 2 surplus Teacher. The counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the respondent no.2 went on unauthorized leave and, therefore, the conclusion arrived at by the Grievance Committee that she has completed the tenure of three years, is contrary to the Shikshan Sevak Scheme. The learned counsel, therefore, contended that the order impugned is bad in law. We have considered the contentions canvassed by the learned counsel. We repeatedly asked the learned counsel to show any document or record or communication issued by the Management to the respondent no.2 whereby the respondent no.2 was informed about the same. However, the learned counsel failed to demonstrate anything in order to show that the respondent no.2 was on unauthorized leave for any reason. It is not in dispute that the respondent no.2 was appointed by the Competent Committee as Shikshan Sevak with 3 effect from 22/9/2001 for a period of three years and approval was also granted by the Education Officer to her appointment, and, therefore, the findings arrived at by the Grievance Committee, in the light of these facts, in our view, are just and proper. No case is made out for showing indulgence. Writ petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE RMP