N~ XI-HG—78 ^ HWWI Vhwvin ^SET ^|<<H^, ^iflyis, [»«yii'ylj,< ^^..^.^)..^.,.^3^^^ 311^1 ^I l<;-)i<b W(T 3n^?I *t| SfI^I 'TSV (ljc|I^«<<tl) t^rere^teifli^i PET1TIONER: RESPONDENTS: 0-A/rit Petition under Artic <t>i<i[ci41*i TnIMf ^ 'fel3t <f^i^i< ^TaiRnsii^r Ram Govind Tiwari, S/o Shri Ram Gopal Tiwari, aged about 59 years, R/o D.C. Road, Near Home Guard Office, Ambikapur (CG) 'ersus- State of Chhattisgam, Through The Secretary, Public Vi/orks Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) 'he Executive Englneer, Public Works Department, National Highvray, Sub Division, Ra'pur. The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, National Highway, Sub Division, Raipur. The Divisional Engineer, Public Works Department, National Highway Sub Division, Raipur. Shri Chandra Minz, Assistant Grade-11, Sub Divisional Clerk, Sub Division Ambikapur (CG) . H.P. Verma, Executive Engineer, Works Highway Ambikapur. |e 226 ofthe Constitution of inaia) Sinaie Bench: Hon'ttie Shri Dhirendra Mishra. J. 4- til XI-HG—78 sn^iiw h-\\* WT SFfl^TT s»)+lich 'S^t -41<41d'4, ®ti1<-i'is,fqcii'yy *11*1MI (hHKh •^200 3fl^[ JWf; (Tpfgq^tT) TOiiw^ftaan^f coun^e Shri Saurabh Dangi, Shri IVI.P.S. Bhatia, State/respondents No.1 to 4. Heard. By this petition, the Annexure-P/6 whereby he has Ambikapur to Sub Division, respondent No.2. Learned counsel for the p| Anneuxre-P/6 was passed only same place was cancelled by r^ order impugned is actuated wit^ replied to the show cause n aliegations against respondent h| tltl From perusai of the docjjments notice was issued to the petiti 3-8-2008, The petitiorier repiied] aliegations vide Annexure-P/2. vide Annexure-P/3. However.1 transfer was cancelled by the ^i P/5. Theimpugned transfer ord^r in consultation with the Cnief Enfiineer. tti|<<ifl<ftl HIHfll* Tf fs^t <^)<^1< ^affimsn^r for the petitioner. Deputy Govt. Advocate for th' 'titioner has impugned the order of oeen transferred from Divisional Office, by the Executive Engineer, stitlonersubmitted that order oftransfer after the earlier order of transfer to the 'spondent No.3 vide Annexure-P/5. The malafide, as the petitioner had earlier otice jssued to him making counter o.6, vide Annexure-P/2. i, it appears thaf a show cause for misconduct vide Annexure-P/1 on the show cause notice making counter He was transferred by respondent No.i on representation Annexure-P/4, his uperintending Engineer vicje Annexure- has been effected by respondent No.2 t:;'^"Sfl'E^'t^'^ f^." -?^T- 7^'?3s-*"?ai: •i^^s^r'^^-'^'^'.''^^ '^": 7Kfc^get?£-^^?-::^?. - .^ XI-HC—78 311^1 V R;'li+ WI SII^T Sf1 Bawe ^ST'^qpfRTO, e>n1<H'l<o, fqwiyy HWVII tb*ll<b "'""'""" """"""""""""""""^ 200 gn^T'q^r (lici(-i°i<iti) TCiiw^teisn^i coUnse Having heard tearned fact that the petitioner has beeifi place within Ambikapur, the pet| the present place ofposting anc^ consuitation with the Chief Efii petitioner has not been able to Court. The petitlon 'is liable to b< '! for the parties, having regard to the transferred from one place to another :|tioner has aiready completed 3 years in [the impugned order has been passed in igineer, I am of the opinion that the [nake out a case for interference by this fe dismissed arvUUsJiereby dismissed. DhirendraMishra "•.Judge^.:'' ' cbl<lTCT<fh "RFRff ^ f^rt' <P>R^U ^affinsnit?!