IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.5837 of 2004 Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union ..Petitioner vs. 1. Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay & Thane District & Ors. ..Respondents Smt.Ranjana Todankar for petitioner Shri M.S.Topkar for respondent no.1 Shri S.B.Sharma for respondent nos.2 and 3 CORAM: A.P.SHAH AND CORAM: A.P.SHAH AND CORAM: A.P.SHAH AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI JJ S.C.DHARMADHIKARI JJ S.C.DHARMADHIKARI JJ 2nd December,2004 2nd December,2004 2nd December,2004 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Advocates. 2. Rule. Learned Counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 3 waive service. 3. By consent, rule is made returnable forthwith. 4. The issue involved in this petition is covered by the decision of this Court in Writ Petition No.1538 of 2001 (Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi Vs. The Security Guards Board for Gr.Bombay and Thane and ors. decided on 5th February, 2003). 5. Mrs.Todankar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners stated that the concerned security guards will apply to the Boafrd for registration within two weeks from today. The Board shalal decide the application within four weeks from the date of receipt thereof and allot the concerned security guards as far as possible to the establishment of respondent no.2. Respondent No.2 is hereby restrained from engaging the security guards through the private contractor. 6. The respondent no.2 shall get itself registered under the Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Scheme, 1981 as amended by Notification dated 1st November, 2002. 7. Petition is disposed of.