IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.332 of 2011 Virendra Kumar Verma Versus The State of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 2. 30.6.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The prayer of the petitioner is for quashing the First Information Report vide Laheri Police Station Case No.19 of 2011 registered on 15th of February, 2011 for the alleged offences under sections 406 and 420/34 of the Penal Code. It is submitted that on perusal of the First Information Report read with the deed of agreement and the plaint, as contained in Annexures 2 and 3, it would appear that the offence whatsoever has been committed by the co-accused Chooramani Verma @ Bhupendra Kumar Bhoopati, who happens to be the son of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the agreement for sale in question was between the informant and aforesaid Chooramani Verma. It is also submitted that this petitioner long ago before lodging of this First Information Report had given an informatory petition to the illegal acts of his son threatening the entire family, including the petitioner. The informant had also filed a civil suit for recovery of the money, which the informant had given to co-accused Chooramani Verma since the sale deed was not executed pursuant to the agreement. From the aforesaid documents it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has not committed the offence. The allegation made in the First Information Report that this petitioner - 2 - came to the house of the informant and said that the work would be done is absolutely vague. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that the First Information Report may not contain the minute details with respect to the alleged offence. However, involvement of the petitioner would be revealed only after the investigation is completed. Considering the submissions of the parties, let the investigation of the aforesaid case be completed expeditiously without unnecessary delay and upon completion of the investigation, police report be submitted forthwith. It goes without saying that the petitioner shall extend all co-operations with the investigating officer. Let the order be communicated to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Laheri Police Station Case No.19 of 2011 through fax on the cost being deposited by the petitioner. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)