In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated: 23.01.2007 Coram: The Honourable Mr.Justice P.SATHASIVAM and The Honourable Mr.Justice N. PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR Writ Petition No.45026 of 2006 E.P.Parthasarathy .. Petitioner ..Vs.. 1.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Park Town, Chennai-600 003. 2.The Chief Engineer(Town Planning), Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Buildings, Park Town, Chennai-600 003. 3.Mrs. Devaki .. Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct respondents 1 and 2 to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 31.08.2006 and take appropriate action as per law in respect of the illegal and unauthorised constructions put up at old No.26, New No.10, Rangabashyam Chetty Street, Saidapet, Chennai-15. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Sivakumar For Respondents : Mr.V.Bharathidasan 1 and 2 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by P.SATHASIVAM,J.) The petitioner has filed the above writ petition seeking to issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2 to consider and dispose of his representation dated 31.08.2006 and take appropriate action as per law in respect of the illegal and unauthorised constructions put up at old No.26, New No.10, Rangabashyam Chetty Street, Saidapet, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Chennai-15. 2. On direction of this Court, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has sent notice to the third respondent by registered post. The learned counsel for the petitioner has produced the returned cover and also filed an affidavit stating that the registered letter was refused by the addressee, viz., third respondent. 3. Taking note of the limited relief prayed for, we are of the view that there is no need to keep the writ petition pending. The learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 2 reports that pursuant to the complaint of the petitioner, action is being taken against the third respondent. ` 4. The above statement is hereby recorded. We also direct the first respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 31.08.2006 in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that if any action is taken against the third respondent, she must be given an opportunity to putforth her case. 5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Asst. Registrar. /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar. raa To 1.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Park Town, Chennai-600 003. 2.The Chief Engineer(Town Planning), Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Buildings, Park Town, Chennai-600 003. W.P No.45026 of 2006 sr[co] gp/2.2. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/