s^ Of"-tf IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION N0. ' SS^-QF 2005 PETITIONER r • cf5 Durgesh Kapoor Dewangan, aged about 30 years, S/o Shri ^/ Harishchandra Dewangan, R/o Temar, Tahsil Sakti, District -Champa (C.G.). ^i^"vw. ,.^^:^<?^~ Janj9ir-( ^:^^ .^ o ^s?^ RESPONDENTS \ ^^S»UR &0 VERSUS ^ 1. State of Chhattisgrh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Schoot Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). // 2. Director, Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G.). /3. District Education Officer, Raigarh (C.G.). ?^^ ^.^"J // ,/ 4. Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Kosir, District Raigarh (C.G.). ^-" WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS. ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS ETC. The petitioner, named above most humbly and respectfully submits as under:- r" vd-CTH ^i«lc>)«,u'-al^-i-K?, Rlril'<4y1< ^ianri^.^^.....^^.-'0? sn^$T q^q? ((jcii^cii^) ^200 :?TcFrf^:if<F tSTaRfq? ?T?H^?^Pf 3TT^$T Loiler sevefal KO 15.06.2005 Shri Sanjay Kuiaar /\ Shri AkhU Agrawal, Heard. The case of fhe pe1 Part Time Teacher vide ord per circular dated 14.7.1< teacher on contract basis, tlie services of fhe petitioi^ petitioner had made of the petitioner, but respondents. Learaed counsel for | inay be aUowed to aiake ^ along wifh copy of this p{ respondent No. 2 be This limited prayei| petitioner is not opposed Haviag considered having heard learaed aUowed to make a^ petition wifhin a period o|J No. 2 raismg all his directed to decide the period of fhree m.onths| ^grawal, counsel for fhe petitioner. yaael Lawyer for the State, |itioner is fhat he was appoiated as ^erdated 12.10. 1995. Thereafter, as $98 the petitioner was appoiated as [however, vide order dated 30.4. 1999 were discontinued. Thereafter, fhe representations for reiastatement action has been taken by tiie <pi<ifo<nri^MwV^"fe^St <<Ri^-cis ^3I^T3n^5T [fhe petitioner submits that petitioner representation to respondent No. 2 ?tition raising all his grievaaces aad to decide his representation. inade by learaed counsel for fhe learaed counsel for fhe State. fhe facts aad circuiastaaces aad for fhe parties, the petitioner is ^sentation along with copy of fhis 15 days froin today to respondent aiid ia tara respondent No. 2 is of the petitioner wifhm a froxn the date of receipt of fhe directled % coubsel repr^sentati< gnevajnces rcplresentation SP/FS/2005-20,000 1.^ r vd-oq <-<4i«irt«,tp-alx-i<i<?, Rom^ ^raRf^ W^.^«.....IM4yms^^ 3T1^$Tq^(^c|ij6|<£;) w^^T^rf^f^ ^T9?^F ^RTTWr ^rf^?T 317^^T ~^-1 consic|.enng wllth representation after petitioner ia accordaace Wifh. fhe direction of. Consequenfly, M|. 3703/2005 and 3771/20(|)5 Certified copy as pe^ all the grievaaces raised by the law, a(bresaid, fhe petition staads disposed <pi^fo<i1ri +IMC>Tt" fc^Sl x^-ci^ ^3rf^HOT^$T I.W.P. No. 1546/2005, I.A. Nos. ^5 also stand disposed of, rules. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge WT; ~n