1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.1 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2327 OF 2007 Balaji Co-op. Hsg. Society. ...Petitioner. Vs. Commissioner, Mr.Jairaj Phatak, Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mrs.Sumedha Rao for the Petitioner. Ms.T.H. Puranik for Respondent No.s1 to 4. Mr.B.R. Zaveri for Respondent No.5. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. June 18, 2009. P.C. By an order dated 22nd November 2007, the Division Bench had recorded the statement of the Municipal Corporation that the Corporation would consider the case of the Petitioner for the issuance of an Occupation Certificate and pass appropriate orders within four weeks. The Petition was accordingly disposed of. Though there was a delay on the part of the Municipal Corporation in passing the order, in 2 the affidavit in reply filed by the Executive Engineer (Building Proposal), Western Suburbs, R-Ward, an order dated 18th December 2008 has been placed on the record. The Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Petitioner has stated that the Petitioner has a substantive grievance in regard to the correctness of the order passed by the Municipal Corporation. If that be so, the petitioner would be at liberty to espouse such remedies as are open in law to challenge the order dated 18th December 2008. Since the Municipal Corporation has now passed an order dealing with the application for the grant of an Occupation Certificate, it would not be expedient to pursue the exercise of the contempt jurisdiction. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. .......