-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIION Writ Petition No.8422 of 2007 Shri Dinesh Suresh Jain ..Petitioner vs. 1. Smt.Dolly. H.Chaiwalla and others ..Respondents Shri Anil Subramaniam for petitioner. Smt.Indrayani Koparkar for respondent no.5 CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. 22nd NOVEMBER, 2007 22nd NOVEMBER, 2007 22nd NOVEMBER, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The impugned order is interlocutory in nature and there can be no prejudice to the petitioner as he can assail this action if final order in the suit is adverse to him. While challenging that order appropriate plea with regard to not referring documents to the hand writing expert can also be raised and that grievance, needless to state, can always be dealt with on its own merits and in accordance with law. The impugned order being interlocutory there is no need to interefere with it at this stage. Petition is dismissed. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)