IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30452 of 2010 1. MD.MAMUN MOHISIN 2. VIJAY MANDAL 3. SATAUNA KUMARI ---------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 6.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Allegation is about not appointing the informant as Panchayat teacher even his being entitled for the said post rather appointment of co-accused Narendra Ram was made basing some forged documents and when the same was queried from Mukhia and Sachiv, they reacted even abused the informant in name of his caste. Submission is that though petitioners’ name appeared in course of investigation but neither they been appointed replacing the informant nor are alleged for abuse in name of caste and co- accused Panchayat Sachiv has been allowed anticipatory bail vide Cr.Misc.No. 6114 of 2010 and the matter now is reconciled. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Amdabad P.S. Case No. 67/2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)