mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7387 OF 2008 Murlidhar Popat More Petitioner versus Ramkrishna Yeshwant More and others Respondents Kishore S. Patil for petitioner. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 21st July 2009 PC :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is the first defendant in a suit filed by the first respondent herein. A decree for possession in respect of the suit property was passed by the Trial Court against the petitioner. An application was made by the first respondent before the Executing Court for appointment of Court Commissioner for taking possession of the suit property by breaking open the lock put over the suit property. The said application has been allowed by order dated 26th June 2008. 2. There is already a decree of possession against the petitioner. The effect of the impugned order is that the decree will be executed by breaking open the lock put on the suit property. Hence, no case for interference is made out. Hence, the writ petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J.)