w.rf SINGLE 3m” § IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. p. (S) No. éggg OF 2009. / William Ekka, S/o. Shri Prakash Ekka, aged about 41 years, Assistant Teacher, Janpad Primaly School, Karma, Block Bagicha, District Jashpur (C. G.) PETITIONER V E R S U S f. :1. State‘Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, School Education Department, (/z / D.K.s. Bhawan, Raipur (c. G.) ’ .e f RESPONDENTS i .‘J 2. District Education Officer, Jashpur, . Distt. Jashpur (C. G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Bagicha, District Jashpur (C.G.) 4. Treasury Account and Pension Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TH CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner begs to submit as under:- E m7>é‘a.\\\\gj HIGH CGURT OF CHEATTISGARH AT BELASFUR WRIT PETITION g8) No. 6388 of 2009' WRIT PETYHON UNDER ARTICLE 226 GF THE CONSTITUTION MM Presem: Shri Som’mm Verma, Advocate with Shri Akshay Yadav, Advocate Shrl PK‘Bhaduri, ?ane1 Lawyer for the Staie/respowéents. B: Hen’ble Shri Satish K. Acnihotri, J. for ‘ihe petitioner. QRBER g GRAL g L A (Fasseé m1 ()6 day of Novemuea‘, 2W9} Heard ieamed counsei for the parties. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a digestion to the reSpondents to pay two advance increments from the date of passtng of B.Ed examimtion, on hi3 0W1: expenses, during his service period. S‘m‘i Verma, teamed couttsel apeear’mg for the petitioner submits that the issue invoked in the present case is no longer res integral as the same has been considered and decided by this Couxt in the matter of Yashwam Kumar Bi/zaradwaj v. Municipal Corporation, Durg and anothert. Shri Verma further submits that the instant petition is squai‘eiy covered by the decision as aforestated. Thus, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to deeide his case in the 1ight 'of aforestated decision, subject t0 verification ofthe fact asto whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed certificate on his own expenses during the course ofhis service. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that in the event, the petitioner make a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law and in the iight of the decision of this Court in . Yashwmit Katmai” Bharadwaj (Supra), Within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. In View of foregoing, according to the ieamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing surVives in this petition for adjndication. / 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. / $d1 stew 4 e e zone (in; Men: w ye go L)3. S3“ . Sh 3“dge VERSUS State Govt. of Chha’ctisgarh & Others. RES?ONDENTS : State