1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 826 OF 2009 AND CRI. APPLICATION NO. 171 OF 2009 Dhananjay Ramdas Paranjpe & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Petitioner No.1, in person, present Mr. K.V. Saste, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State Mr. Kiran Kandpile with Ms. Revati Dere for Respondent No. 4. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: AUGUST 4, 2009 P.C.:- Petitioner No.1’s case is that he married a lady from Germany, and for some time, he had to pursue the cases pertaining to continued stay of his wife in India. Now, those grievances have already been redressed, but the petitioners want exemplary compensation. 2 2. We are afraid that this Writ Petition is not maintainable, in view of the fact that the petitioners can approach civil Court for compensation. 3. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of, as the main grievances of the petitioners have been redressed. The Rule stands discharged. 4. Consequently, the Application also stands disposed of. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J.