1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. FIRST APPEAL NO. 365 OF 2005 (Sachinkumar Naidu .v. Smt. G. Sunita w/o Sachinkumar Naidu) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Smt. U.A. Patil, Advocate for the appellant. Smt. A.J. Rao, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 22ND JULY, 2010. Learned Counsel for the parties submit that the parties have amicably settled their disputes and they have tendered consent terms duly signed by the respondent-wife and the Advocates for the parties on record. The consent terms are taken on record and marked as `X' for identification. Learned Counsel for the appellant states that the appellant-husband will sign the consent terms on or before Monday the 26th July, 2010. Her statement is accepted. The respondent-wife, who is present in the Court, states that she has gone through the consent terms and she has understood the same. She confirms that she has received demand drafts, as provided in paragraph 2 of the consent terms. She also states that a decree of divorce by consent, as stated in paragraph 2 of the consent terms, be granted. She further states that she will withdraw the case filed by her under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., as stated in paragraph 3 of the consent terms, within a period of eight weeks from today. Learned Counsel for the appellant-husband submits that the appellant shall file petition before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh for quashing of the Criminal Complaint under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and 2 in that event the respondent-wife undertakes to cooperate and give consent for quashing of the complaint. Their statements are accepted. The statements made and undertakings, if any, given in the consent terms are accepted. Appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. Decree be drawn accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.