... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1128 OF 1996 APPLICATION NO.1128 OF 1996 APPLICATION NO.1128 OF 1996 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri S.R.Shinde, A.P.P. for the Applicant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 07, 2006. : OCTOBER 07, 2006. : OCTOBER 07, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Office noting shows that the Application stands dismissed as against the Respondent No.6 and the Respondent No.8 is dead. None appears for other Respondents. Delay is only of 20 days. Hence, Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). However, the Revision Application does not survive against the Respondent Nos.6 and 8. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE