1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 463 OF 2010 (Sau. Anjali Ajay Rapartiwar vs. Gangabai K. Sawaimul & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. FEBRUARY 17, 2010. Shri Kariya, learned counsel for the petitioner argues that after first opportunity was given to the respondent – plaintiff to lead evidence, he failed to avail it and hence the petitioner – defendant was directed to lead evidence. On the date on which the petitioner was to lead evidence in defence, the respondent moved an application without disclosing any reason and that application has been granted just for asking. I have perused the orders passed by the trial Court along with impugned order with his assistance. Though I find the grievance made by the learned advocate correct, still as the suit is of the year 2007, the trial Court found it fit to grant an opportunity to the respondent – plaintiff to lead evidence. The opportunity to the respondent will be fruitful and may put an end to controversy once for all. 2 In the circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the use of discretion by trial Court. Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.