IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-9933 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 5, 2010 Jagjit @ Jaljit .....Petitioner v. The State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.B.S.Chahar, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is mainly for protection of life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondent nos.4 to 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Superintendent of Police, Panipat, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application/complaint, dated 19.3.2010, Annexure P1, already made to him by the petitioner. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, i.e., Superintendent of Police, Panipat, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application/complaint, dated 19.3.2010, Annexure P1, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioner. 5.4.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge