^ ^ fM't'*' HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR (Divisioa Beuch) Coraia: Hon'blc ShriJagdisfa BliaUa, Ag.C.-J. Sa HonTste Shri Satish K. Agiuhotn, J. W. P.No. 359 of 2006 Petitioners 4. Kespondents Versus 1, 3. 4. 5. 6. Smt. Kiran Sao, W/o Kartik Sao, Agcd about 35 ycars, Sarpaach., Gram Pauchayat: Banora, Block, Tehsfl. and Uistrict Kaigarh, Cbliattisgarh. PraniCNd Kmnar, S/o Gudhari, Aged about 40 ycars, Sarpaach, Giain Paachayat: Sakarbaga, Post: Banora, Tehsil &, District: Kaj^arh, Chhattisgsurti. Indra Viias Panda, S/o Narstofaa Panda, Aged about 49 years, SarpaDch, Gram 1'anchayat: Biiaria, 'Fchsil & District: Raigarh, Clihattisgarh.. Umesh Kumar Agrawal, S/o Laxini Narayaa Agrawal, Aged about 42 years, Sarpanch, Gram. Pauchayat: MahapalH, Tchsil & Uistrict: Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. Stafe of Chhattisgarh, Through fhe Secretaiy, Department of Industries, Maatralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Kaipur, Uhhattisgarh. The CoUector, Raigarh, District: Raagaxh, Ctihattisgarti. The Sub Dinsional Of&cer (Revenue), Raigarh, Districfc RaigaA, Chfaattisgach. Thc I'residcnt, ChMattisgarh PoUution Conservation Boaid,Raipur, Chhattisgarh. The Divisioaal Focest Officer, Raigarh, Forest Divisioa: Raigarh, District: Raigarh, Chfaattisgarb. Ind Agio Synergy Lixuited, Kotarlia, Disbcict: Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ^KS^^-- 7. MSP Steel & Poiwer Limited, Jamgaon, Tchsil & Uistrict: Raigarh Chliattisgarh. 8. Chliattisgarh State Electricity Board thiough its Secretaiy, Danganiya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PBTITION UKDBR ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CON8TITUT1QN C WDIA Shri V. C. Ottetwar, Adyocate wifh Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitionera. Shri G, D. Waswani, Govt. Advocate for the respondents No. 1 to 3 and 5. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Advocate for fhe respondent No.4. Shri Sanjay K. Agarwal, Advocate for fhe respondents No. 6 and 7. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 12th day of November, 2007) Thc following oral ordcr of thc Court ispasscd by Hon'ble Stai Jagdish BhaBa, Acting CJ. i^--"' -^ Leamed coimsel appeariag for fhe respoiident No.4 m&naed fhat fhe respondcnts No. 6 aad 7 were directed to iastatl Electrostatic Precipitator, which is nuuuug con.tinuousfy, thus fhere is no poUution in fhe area. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondeuts No. 6 aad 7 mformed that the Electrostatic Precipitedor is runmng coatiuuousty round ftic ctock. In the tight offhe above statemeuts no further mterference is caUed for. Accordingty, the petition is dispoaed o£ Sd/- Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Sdl- S.K. Agnihotri Judge ^SA^