IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12153 of 2010 1. GULAB JHA SON OF LATE JAGDISH JHA 2. PRAKASH DEVI WIFE OF GULAB JHA, BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE HATANI, P.S. GHOGARDIHA, DISTRICT MADHUBANI. --- PETITIONERS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR—OPP.PARTY. ----------- For the petitioners : Mr. Gagandeo Yadav, Adv. For the State : Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, A.P.P. ------- 2/ 04.05.2010 Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution, for offence under sections 498(A), 379, 323 of the Indian Penal Code as also under section 3/4 of the D.P.Act, the petitioners are parents-in-law of the complainant, Urmila Devi. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that allegation of demand of dowry and torture is general and omnibus in nature against all the accused persons. However, the main allegation is against Dasarath Jha, who is husband of the complainant and who was supposed to take care of well being of his wife, who is complainant. By referring to Annexure-2 it is further submitted that the petitioners are separate in mess and business with co-accused Dasarath Jha, the husband of the complainant. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, - 2 - let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1075 of 2009 dated 19.11.2008/ T.R. No. 2261 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J ) BTiwary/