HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISftWtH AT BCB.ASPW W. P.(S) Nn. 1636 <rf 2007 Petitioner ^/- Versus Respondents ,-c-' Kediow R«m Sahu, aged olwut 42 years, Son of Late Siri fAahcaryi R<m Sohu. Presently posted <» Assistant Teacher, Middte School Jaisdwmi, Block Chorama, Oistrit Kanker (C.©.) 1. StateofChhatti^crh Throu^i:- the Secretary, Oeptrtment of School Education, &.K.S. Bhawan, Ru'pur (C.®.) 2. The Oirector, Public Instnictions Raipur (C.S.) 3. The Oistriel'Education Offfcer, Kanker (C.S.) 4. The Block 6ducotion Officer, Chaa'oroo, bistrict Knnker (CjG.) SB: Hon'bte A*r. Justice Satish K. Agmhotri, J Present: Mr. Anand K. Shuklo.Advocateonbeh<rffofMr.P.P.Sahu. Advocate fw the petitioner. Ms. beepali Pandvf, Pcnet Lawyer for State/respondents. OR&ER (Pcased on #iis 21** &ey of Mcrdi, 2007) 1. The question of lai» inwlved herein asto whether the petitfoner is f» eirtitled to re9ulor pay scalew.e.f. the dat-e of initiol oppoin'htient or from the ddte of completion of pnAotion period. 2. Learned couresel «ypeoring for the petitioner os wel os for the Stat-e/respondents jointly submit thnt Ihe facts <md question of kw involved the present writ petition ore Ihe same to that of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tn»ori <md others vs. State 6ovemmen)' of Chhatt-isgorh & others), which NKIS allwied vide order dated 7.U.2006. 3. In view of the above-stated submissions made by leamed eounsel for the parties, ttie wit petition is atlowed in the some tenns. No order <a to costs. Sd/- SatishK-Agnihotn Judge Subhash