IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2010 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 12463 of 2010(G) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SANDEEP. P.S., II GRADE DRAFTSMAN. P.W.D.ROADS SUB DIVISION, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE, SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINNER (P.W.D. ADMINISTRATION) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.ARAVINDAKUMAR BABU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (C) No. 12463 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P4 order of transfer dated 18.3.2010. It is the case of the petitioner that it was ignoring the fact that he was already been transferred as per Ext.P3 dated 2.11.2009 that Ext.P4 order was issued. If Ext.P3 is taken into consideration, there would not be any reason for including the petitioner in Ext.P4. However, the learned Government Pleader submits that Ext.P4 is not an order of transfer and, in fact, it is an order posting the petitioner to the local self Government Department. Therefore, Ext.P3 cannot stand in the way of issuance of Ext.P4 order. Be that as it may, grievance against Ext.P4 can be considered by the 3rd respondent. Even as per Ext.P4 the postings effected thereunder would be reviewed during the general transfer. Therefore the petitioner is given liberty to submit a representation within a period of one week from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment to the 3rd respondent. In case, such a representation is received from the petitioner, WPC.12463 of 2010 : 2 : the 3rd respondent shall consider and pass orders thereon, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge