IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3698 of 2008 PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA & ORS . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 10.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Counsel for the petitioners state that the Letters Patent Appeal against the order on the writ petition has been dismissed. Counsel for the State does not dispute the position. Annexure-A to the show cause complying conditionally with the order on the writ petition subject to Appeal therefore attains finality. If the petitioners have any further grievance with regard to their service conditions, consequent to their appointment by Annexure-A, the remedy lies in a fresh writ petition. Learned counsel submits that he desires to file a rejoinder to the show cause. This Court is satisfied of its limited jurisdiction in contempt. It is not persuaded that the matters can now be further examined in the contempt jurisdiction as any grievance with regard to the alleged non-fulfillment of any 2 service conditions in pursuance of Annexure-A have necessarily to be a subject matter of fresh writ petition only. The application stands disposed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)