IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Appeal from Order No.782 of 2007. Appeal from Order No.782 of 2007. Appeal from Order No.782 of 2007. Mr.Vikram M. Singh Butola ..Appellant versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Mr.Ajay Mishra for the Appellant Mrs. Geeta Mulekar for the State Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 19th Oct., 2007 Dated : 19th Oct., 2007 Dated : 19th Oct., 2007 P.C. 1. Heard learned advocate for the appellant for some time. 2. It is very clear that it is only against the refusal of the ad-interim relief the plaintiff has approached this court. It is the case of the plaintiff that the defendant be restrained from obstructing the plaintiff in carrying out his business. However, in fact nothing has been pointed out, what sort of obstructions the defendants are creating. Merely deputing a constable near the gate of the plaintiffs hotel would certainly not amount to creating any obstruction. The order passed by the learned Judge is legal and correct. There is no need to interfere at thi stage. Hence appeal is -2- dismissed. 3. The trial court is directed to dipose of the Notice of Motion on merits as early as possible and in any event on or before 30.12.2007. 4. The trial Court should not get influenced by any of the observations passed in this order. (S.R.Sathe, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.)