^-^^•—ST-rS5 o Bsricti'. C?BaN ctr-<^ /"3) ^Ly IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR J^.•t W.P. No. ^S>73 /2004 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS '^- |C.1 sdN^' y^r^.-r-t"' ^e-^ H ^ ^ (^r^f^il ^%^^.i)' ^., '^^.1,...,...,-, ^"^^.fi"'w:^- ^ ,^7 Kamal Singh Yadav, aged about 58 years, S/o. Shri Manohar Singh Yadav, Occupation:Retired Chhattisgarh Rajya Krishi Vipnan Board, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, R/o. Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh VERSUS \1 ^" ^. 4. p^ State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Agriculture, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh State of Madhya Pradesh, Through: The Secretary, Government of M.P. Department of Agriculture, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh Chhattisgarh Rajya Krishi Vipnan Board, Through: The Managing Director, C.G. Rajya Krishi Vipnan Board, Purani Ganj Mandi Parisar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Madhya Pradesh Rajya Krishi Vipnan Board, Through: The Managing Director, M.P. Rajya Krishi Vipnan Board, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Through: The Secretary, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh @ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 *[T*Ic5T ^»nq» ^ET^Kiioq, u>-a1xi<i<»,f^oi^y^ _^_ ^,^< 3TT^$T<PTf^Tfcp n^TT3TI^$T^HT<P ^£ 1:J 3n^$T q?q? ('jclijdoEi) W^200^- g^TTW^rf^f 3TT^^ olf 11-5-2005 MJss ShiQirmlia Singhd, Mr. U.N.S. Deo, GQV^ AAr* Sachin 5Jn9h Rajput, Mr. Ranbir Singh Marhas), The petitioncr has pref^? 227 of - the Con^tjtution responaents to pay retiral ber^ b^nefits to the p^tltion^r aio^< 18% Der annum. Brief fact^ leaaing to pstitionsr wa5 working as Mahasamund. A criminai against the petitioner arsd chaj punishable under Sectj of fllina of the charge sheet, the petitioner w^re terminat^ on, the criminai was was acquitted vide judgment preferred an appeai before vjde judgment dated 29-7-1^< repre^entation b^fore the e^unsei for the petltioner. A<jvocate for the- State/resoondent NoJ. coun^^J for' respond^nts No.2 & 4» counsei for respondenTs No.3 ^5. |rred this writ petltion under Articte 226/ India seeking relief to direct the rfits, arrears of pay and a!{ conse.quenTlai with interest th^re of to the tun^ of thle cpiqFcx-n^i +ii+ioT^?fe^ ^Rri^i^ ^3T(^T3TT^^T aio^g fijjng of .thi^ writ peti+Ion are tnat the ^ccountant in Krishi Upaj McincJi Samiti, about embezziement was reaistered ^g^ ^heet wa3 flied for th©commis^Jon of •|on 409 of the I.P.C. However, at the time order dated31-7n*1972 the "services of wlthout conductlng any enqujry. Later Te^mlnaTed ln?o acqujttal and the petjtioner ^ated 11-2-1997, o.^a.msf which the State Hjgh Court and the some was djsmissed 99. Thereafter, the petitioner fiied a Mc^na9in9 &^^^^^. Kri^hi Upaj Mandi Board ^ide XI-HC-78 vjwl^Hlri^l, vnl^<i<<, Rirti^^ *1l*l<ftl $FTT^ 3TT^$T<I^f^Tt^ ^TT3n^^T3?Hte ^^ ^200 ^ 31T^?T q^ ((j<|i^6|<£;) B^^TT^'^f^f 3TT^$T _ ^^ <pi^[o<i1»iWR^T^"fe^t KRn^-ciK ^3rf^T3n^ST for reinstatina him, On 2-12-^999 the petitioner wa^ reinstatecl wjthout back woges. On this, 'ttie petii ioner preferred a writ petition befofB the A^adhya Pradesh High Court a|id that writ petitlon was declaed by the High Court vide order da+ad representation before the Bo^ vsde Annexure P-4 and the ord^rad that the petitsoner1 $s time, on attaining the aae of| June, 2004, Against the oro?e Mandi Board, th& petifioner /5overnm€nt. The State <5o^ 4-10-2000 (Annsxurs P-3) d'wsctmg the petitjoner To make G represenTjztion before the Board and The Board WGS directed.. 'to decide the ^at^e, 'On thb,. the petitjorrer made a (rd.-the Board decided the'representation [Board while deciding the representation not entitted for back wa9es.In the m^an superannuation the petitioner retired in Annexure P-4 by the Krbhi Upaj preferr&d an appeai before the State |?ernment vide its order dated 8an7=2004 sdary and otherbenefits to tt| Relurn has been fllecl (Annaxur^ P-5) directed the ^oard to mcxke payment of atl ^molumentjs, €petitioner. Tne Ministcr In-charge simiiar order* But/in^pite of that the Board is not making any payment to the petltioner. on behajf of respondents No.l & 3 mentionin9 therein that the Sfate ^overnment has no authority to pas^ the order and considering ^he representatjon of the petitioner* In pursuance of the High Courf's direction/ the Board reachsd to the ^^; XI-HC-78 +11+101 vjw|<^IWI^, tp-1nl^''i<?, (fiioi'<iy'< ^^^ .....^.^...<.^.<..Y........^200<,L / OT^^T^f^FTfcP ^^an^^T^wp ^< ^, ll I. 3TT^^T q^P (yii^q^i) ^^rT^R^rf^TCT^^T coifrise occdision Soo^d conciu^ion that tl^@ petition^r it has been proyed thot the w'^ \ I have heard learn^Q Mr. Ranblr Sin9h Marha| 5 argued thdt on eariser Court, the Hi^h Court pa^sed r'epresentation before the made representation, the Boar|j conciu^ion that th@ p^tition^r circumstances, If the petition^r he ought t@ havc preferred o^ th^ fiovernment was not entitMd 8ut, the arouments adv^ No.3 & 5 i3 not in con^onanc4 Kri^hi Upaj Mandi AdhiniyamJ Adhiniyam). Section 59 of Saysrnment may of Jts awn far and the puTpose af ^af^fymg hfm^ef'f\ iegality w pmpriety of wy de\ regulanty af ths prccsedlngs Sn any CQSQ, Sf csppears fa ifje TTse niptian pmceeqing^ cp|qfc^<i1<1+1l+1ol'^ff^l'^Fjl^-CI^ ^3ri^TOT^^T not entitbd for back wages, Ther^fore, tt- petition be dlsmissed.- ^.sej for the parries. S, Seam^d counseJ for ra^pondents No*3 & the petitioner approached The High order that the petltioner ^houid make a and in pursuance of thQt the petitloner consldered the same and reached to the ^ not entitbd for any back waqes. In the jr not satisfied with that order, then writ petition before the Hiah Court to interfere with th^'order. |snced by jearned counse! for respondent^ with thc proyJsions of th@ Chhatti^aarh 1972 . (herdnafter refcrrcd . to as thc ^dhiniyani envisages that l^e Stafe ^r on an applicathn made to If calf of the Managing Oirsctor, for the \^r if^eff, a^ fhe casc may be, a^ f^ fhe ^/sfw taken or ffrder and QS to fhe ^f the camtn/ttcc, as the case may be. If \Sf^fe Sav^rnmenf ii^af any ^uch dec^hn XI-HC-78 vjTyc|<-<4|«10)^^y-a1<1<l<o,Iqrtl^-l^ ^mcCT^'Tf^ w ••!1""^"' '••••^"•••••^200 <$- 3n^?iqsr^(^cii^6i^) 3Tr^$Tct5Tf^:TtcP ^T^TTSfl^^T^WP ^" ^RTTW^Tfef OT^^T -^ <?r ^rde^ ^r p^occeding so %: ,»eversgd. o^ remitted for wa thcrean as hc or (t may deem fi Therefore, in view of empowered To cdi for the j^aljty and proprlety of the de conclu^ion that the order committee should be modific reconsJd^ratJon th@n the ^over may deem fit. Slmilariy, as per the pro th^ Stats ^oy^rnmfint is enti" Mandi Commsttces, and the compiy with the directions issi^ section (1). Therefore/in view of that there l^ no force in the a| r^spondents No,3 d 5, and The| the orders pas^ed by the S^ admined position that mere!\| nQlding reguiar enquiry, the pe| 7-1972, and iater on char9c ^ cpl<iIo<i1Ti HPrat'^"fe^ Kpji^-ci^ ^3Tf^T3TI^$T ^fkcl for' ^uld he modified, annuikd, ^nsiderQtiw he o^ st msy psss SLfch orde^ ¥\ 1-his provi^ion th^ Stat^ Government ig r^cord and examtne The same as To the lcislon. Zf the Sovernment reache^ to the tas^ed by the Managing Director, or id, annulled, reversed or remitted for fnment i^ entitted to pas^ any order a^ It •^bions @f Section 40-A of the Adhiniy'am 'fed to giy^ dirsctions to the BoarcS and Bdard and Mandi CommiTtees are bound to ^ed by the Stata 6-overniTicnt unde»" sub- t|ie above provisions, I am of the oplnion ^guments advanced by tearned coun^^i for IBoard and Committees are bound to obev |'ate Sovernment. Eyen otherwise, it i^ on reglsterjng a crimjnai ease wlthout Ititioner was removed frorn service on 31- |heet was filad G9ainst th@ p^titioner in XI-HC-78 Hl*1rtl ^Tff^ \dw{ -"41<410)«;t?Tl1'<-l<l<?, Iqrtl'd^X .^.^.^^'M 3TT^^T<y)TR4i<b n^TT^^T^wy? ooma y .[ f^yM 3TI^$T q?cp (4cli*161<^) ^200 <5- ^?TT^^rfl^3TT^^T thfe which he wa^ acquitted by the High Court, even no enquir^ pstitloner far any misconduct for no fault on his part and u Court Then he was reinstatedj i^ entitled for ai! back wages a?^ In the drcumstance^, aiiowed and the same is ailow4d make payrr^nt of <xiJ ."^tira! petitioner within a period of copy of thi^ ordcr, failing whi{ Interest on th^ whote amount from which the amount was In vi©wof thi^ ordsr, A4 and 9543/2004 stand disposed| Parties ar^ entitied for <p|^[co<ilTl HTR^t' ^" fe^Si KRl^-cix ^3rf^T3TT^$T triai Court and which was confirm^d by 'l/ was instjtuted and conducted agaJnst the .Therefore/ the petitbner was i'emoved tJmately, ha was acquitt^d up to the hlgh [ Hence, In this aspect also.the peTltioner td benefits a^ were admJssibie to him. jthe petitioner^ petjtion is liabie to be ^d. Respondents No,3 &, 5 are dlrected to :its and back wage^ a^ ad?r,Issibb to the months from the date of receipt of a ^h, the petitioner wiii abo bc entitted f©r th^ rate of 6% psr annom from the dat^ rhissjbfe to him. t(W.)P.No.4730/2004..I.A.No3.9133/2004 l|of. 4€rtsfiedcopy of this ordsr* Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge be^f Dwo dt adrhisslbf