IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 12450 of 2008 Decided on: 27.6.2011 Vijay Kumar …Petitioner Versus H.P. Forest Corporation and another …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate vice . Mr. Tarlok Chauhan, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Ms. Archana Dutt, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition in order to enable her client to make a representation to the Managing Director of the respondent-Corporation. 2 In case of representation being made by the petitioner, it will be considered in view of the law laid down by their Lordships of Hon'ble Supreme Court in L.Robot D'Souza Versus The Executive Engineer, Southern Railway and another, AIR 1982 S.C. 854, whereby the expression “Work Charge” has been explained. 3 In view of the directions/observations made hereinabove, the present petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge June 27, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No