IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 03-02-2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.1630 of 2010 R.Rose .. Petitioner. Versus 1. The Managing Director, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board, No.1, Pumping Station Road, Chindadripet, Chennai-600 002. 2.The Area Enginee V, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board, 12th Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai. 3.The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 4. The Government of Tamilnadu, rep. By its Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Fort St. Goerge, Chennai-9. .. Respondents. (R4 impleaded vide order of this Court, dated 3.2.2010, made in M.P.No.1 of 2010 in W.P.No.1630/10) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first and second respondent to receive process and consider to accord water and sewerage connection to the premises at No.545, P.H.Road, Saradhammal Complex, Arumbakkam, Chennai-106, without insisting on the production of the completion certification/No Objection Certificate from the third respondent or any other authorities concerned. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Petitioner : Mr.D.S.Rajasekaran For Respondents : Mr.G.S.Mohan (R1 and R2) Mr.D.Veerasekaran (R3) Mr.R.Murali Government Advocate (R4) O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing for the respondents. 2. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal. 3. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the fourth respondent is directed to dispose of the appeal, dated 21.3.2003, filed under Section 113A(6), read with Section 79 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 4. The learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the fourth respondent is directed to dispose of the appeal, dated 21.3.2003, filed under Section 113A(6), read with Section 79 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as well as to the other parties concerned, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar csh https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ To 1. The Managing Director, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board, No.1, Pumping Station Road, Chindadripet, Chennai-600 002. 2.The Area Enginee V, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board, 12th Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai. 3.The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 4. The Secretary, Government of Tamilnadu, Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Fort St. Goerge, Chennai-9. 1 cc To The Government Pleader, SR.6935 1 cc To Mr.M.Vembadiyan, Advocate, SR.6663 1 cc To Mr.G.S.Mohan, Advocate, SR.5980 Writ Petition No.1630 of 2010 arco(co) pmk.18.2.2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/