IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 7328 of 2010 Date of Decision: 11.11.2010 Amarjit Singh and another .... Petitioners Versus Gurjant Singh and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Sherry K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioners 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 29.9.2010 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Talwandi Sabo thereby rejecting the application of the petitioners seeking impleadment under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. After arguing some time, learned counsel for the petitioners states that counsel for the petitioners Sh. G.S. Jattana never given his consent in the earlier suit i.e. Civil Suit No. 971 of 21.7.2006 titled as Jit Singh and others vs. Nirbhai Singh and others to decree the suit as per compromise. The only statement given was that suit of the plaintiff can be decreed to the extent of shares of the plaintiffs. Learned counsel for the petitioners further states that in the earlier Civil Suit No. 971 of 21.7.2006 plaintiffs themselves have admitted that present petitioners i.e. defendants are the co-sharers in the property in dispute. Learned counsel for the C.R. No. 7328 of 2010 2 petitioners further states that in Civil Suit No. 971 of 21.7.2006, shares of petitioners/defendants No. 5 and 6 was wrongly divided by the plaintiffs and defendants No. 1 to 4 among themselves leaving defendants No. 5 and 6 without any share by playing fraud. Learned counsel for the petitioners further states that petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the compromise decree. Present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the compromise decree in accordance with law. (ALOK SINGH) 11.11.2010 JUDGE reena