IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15796 of 2009 AMRENDRA SINGH @ AMRENDRA KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 29.07.2009 Heard Sri Anirudh Kumar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri Dasrath Mehta, APP for the State. The petitioner as may appear from the earlier rejection order is the assailant of the deceased. The contention has been raised that except the informant no one could be an eye witness to the occurrence. This Court cannot give a finding of fact on the competence of any person being a witness to the occurrence as the same is the domain of trial Judge. The informant has identified the petitioner as the assailant of his brother. But considering that the allegation is there and trial has just begun, I am not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner on bail. The petition is dismissed. As noted above, trial has begun. The trial court, that’s, F.T.C. V, Gaya is directed is expedite the hearing by ensuring the production of witnesses before it. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)