IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 945 of 2011 Sidha Nath Sharma, son of Late Ram Lai Mistri, resident of Sichai Colony, (Behind H. E. School), Tar Bangla, P.S. – Dehri (Rohtas), Bihar ……………… Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar 3. The Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar 4. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Balmiki Nagar, Bihar 5. The Executive Engineer, Sikarhana Tatbandha Division, Motihari 6. The Assistant General, Birchand Patel Path, Patna ………………. Respondents ---------------------------------- 05. 15.11.2011 In view of the material and evidence brought on record by way of supplementary affidavit with regard to payment of benefit of A.C.P. duly certified by the Bank, the stand of the petitioner that it does not relate to ACP but with regard to his leave encashment is not supported by any evidence brought on record so far. The dispute now is with regard to accounting. Let the petitioner satisfy the authorities with regard to the entry in question and correlate that amount with leave encashment and if it be so, the authorities will do what is required to be done with regard to payment of such a claim. This Writ stands disposed off with above liberty. SKM (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)