1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16836 of 2011 1 RAMACHANDRAN, S/O.ANBU CHETTIYAR 2 A. RAMACHANDRAN 3 S. RAMESH 4 S.LAKSHMANAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED 1 TO 4 Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, NAGERCOIL,KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT CR NO. NOT KNOWN/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.N.S.RAMAKRISHNA DASS Advocate For Respondent : MR.T.MOHAN, Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Section 420 of I.P.C. and seek anticipatory bail. 2. Mr.T.Mohan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that only petition enquiry is pending against the petitioners on the basis of the complaint preferred by one Nagarajan. 3. However, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners were frequently called for interrogation by the respondent police and as such they are having apprehension of arrest. 4. It is seen that only petition enquiry is pending against the petitioners on the basis of the complaint preferred by one Nagarajan. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are having apprehension of arrest as they have been called for interrogation by the respondent police frequently, this Court is constrained to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoil, on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 5.30 p.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter, they shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 21/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, NAGERCOIL. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S.N.S.RAMAKRISHNA DASS Advocate SR. No.45168 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16836 of 2011 Date :21/12/2011 RJ/23.12.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/