IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD Monday, July 04, 2011 Present: Hon’ble Sri Justice N. Ravi Shankar Crl.P.No. 258 of 2011 Between: Kilari Vijay Kumar …Petitioner and The State of AP and another …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRL.P.No. 258 of 2011 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 2. The petitioner herein is the first accused in C.C.No. 168 of 2009 on the file of the court of II Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar. He is the husband of the de facto complainant who is the second respondent herein. The offences alleged are those punishable under section 498-A IPC and S. 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued that all the allegations made against the petitioner are bald in nature and therefore the case against him should be quashed. She also pointed out that earlier in Crl.P.No. 6390 of 2010 this court already quashed the case against the other accused. It may however be noted that in the said order this court observed that the main thurst of the allegations is against this petitioner only. In fact a perusal of the allegations in the complaint would show that the main allegations are against this petitioner only. In the circumstances I regret that I am unable to agree with the contentions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and further all of them would fall within the purview of the disputed questions of fact which cannot be decided in this petition. This petition is accordingly dismissed. It is made clear that the trial court shall proceed to dispose of the case without being influenced in any manner by this order. _____________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J. July 4, 2011. *BVS