IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46538 of 2009 1. NIDHI KUMARI, WIFE OF AMIT PURANIK, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 27, SHEOPURI, PROFESSOR’S COLONY ROAD, P.S. SHASTRINAGAR, DISTRICT PATNA, AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF B4/9, SUN CITY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX, OFF SINHGADH ROAD, ANAND NAGAR, WADGAON BK, PUNE- 411 051. 2. PREETI JAISWAL, WIFE OF UDAY SHANKAR, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 27, SHEOPURI, PROFESSOR’S COLONY ROAD, P.S. SHASTRINAGAR, DISTRICT PATNA, AT PRESENT RESIDING IN FLAT NO. 202, GAYATRI RESIDENCY, WHITEFIELD, KONDAPUR, HYDERABAD. ---- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH VIGILANCE, BIHAR, PATNA. ---- OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2 5.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the Vigilance Department. Petitioners are daughters of Yogendra Kumar Jaiswal who along with his entire family has been made accused in a case in a case under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The petitioners are now married. It is said that they were not married during the check period. It is further stated that about 3 lacs odd and 4 lacs odd has been shown to be the assets which has been transferred by their father in their name. These aspects of the matter can be considered during trial or any other stage of the case. Counsel for the Vigilance Department has stated that petitioner no. 1 has not co-operated during the investigation inasmuch as she has not presented herself for examination before the Vigilance Department. Petitioner no. 1 should co-operate with the investigating agency in question, if charge sheet has not been submitted in this case. Be that as it may, petitioners namely Nidhi Kumari and 2 Preeti Jaiswal are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No. 3 of 2007, giving rise to Special Case No. 77 of 2007 on furnishing bail bonds of rupees ten thousand with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Vigilance 1st, Patna subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)