IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20890 of 2009 NEMATULLAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 24.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the informant and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no mention at all in the FIR regarding demand of dowry at petitioner’s hand though he is husband. Allegation of torture is there and this much is stressed by learned counsel for the informant but he failed to mention the nature of torture, while an attempt was made by learned Sessions Judge the proposal appeared from complainant side that transfer of land in her name may be one of the grounds for compromise. It is a clear case in which by virtue of section 498A an attempt is made to get transferred land in her name otherwise also gotni standing on footing of the informant, has been also levelled the same allegation. Thus I find it not a fit case in which anticipatory bail may be refused. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or - 2 - surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dalsingsarai, Samastipur in Dalsingsarai PS Case no. 141 of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI