- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6535 OF 2006 Shri.Pralhad Manikrao Mahamuni ...Petitioner VS. 1.M/s.Piaggio Vehicles Pvt.Ltd. and another. ...Respondents --- Mr.A.P.Paralikar, for Petitioner. Mr.Vishwajeet Sawant with Subhash Jadhav i/b. ALMT Legal for Respondent no.1. Ms.S.S.Bhende, AGP for Respondent no.2. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 25th January,2008. DATED: 25th January,2008. DATED: 25th January,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C.: . Heard the learned Counsel appearing for both the sides. Perusal of the provisions of Persons with Disabilities (Equal opportunities Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act shows that the respondent no.1 will not be an establishment within the meaning of Section 2(k) of that Act, and therefore, the authority will not have power to issue direction to the respondent no.1. I do not see any reason to interfere with the order. The petition is disposed of. - 2 - ---