IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) No.: 3377 of 2008 Date of decision: 1.7.2009 Arjun Singh … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P and others. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: None for the petitioner. For the respondents: Mr. R.K.Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General. Per Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) The petitioner by means of this writ petition has challenged his transfer order dated 17th June, 2006. There are two grounds to challenge the order; firstly that the petitioner had been transferred within a short span of nine months and secondly, that he had to superannuate on 31st January, 2008. Stay order was granted in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner obviously must have retired on 31st January, 2008. In view of the above, the petition has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed. ( Deepak Gupta ) Judge. July 1, 2009 ( Surinder Singh ) ™ Judge. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?