1 lpa72.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 72 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2840 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10893 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and the Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: Smt. Nishita Mhatre & Shri M. T. Joshi, JJ. Date : 6th June, 2011 Shri S.S. Thombre, Advocate, for the appellants. Shri N.B.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. ---- 1. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellants. 2. In our opinion, there is no need to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single 2 lpa72.11 Judge on 24.2.2011 in Writ Petition No.10893 of 2010. The learned Single Judge, while passing the said order, had refused to grant interim relief at that stage and liberty was granted to the petitioners to move the court for interim relief, if they were in a position to show that they were being adversely affected because of restoration of the licence to Respondent No. 6 in the Writ Petition. 3. It appears that Civil Application No.6037 of 2011 was moved by the petitioners. The Learned Single Judge, by the order dated 6.5.2011, has recorded a statement made by the learned A.G.P. that the petitioners' quota of 42,000/- liters of kerosene was not reduced and that this quota will be available to the petitioners in future, as well. 4. In these circumstances, we see no reason to 3 lpa72.11 interfere in the matter. Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. Consequently, the civil application does not survive and stands disposed of, accordingly. (M. T. JOSHI, J.) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) pnd/lpa72.11