Hi©HCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR • Writ P&tltion iS) Ho. £88of 200S Petitionsrs , 1) Sujan Kumar Chatterjee, Assistarrt Teacher, Government Higher Secondar^ Schooi, Kumarda, Distt Rajnandgaon (MP), 2), .Sumrt Kumar Bose, .Asslstant Teaoher, Government Higher Secondary Schooi, Gotatote, Dlstt. Rajnandgaon (MP). Versys. 1) State of Madhya Pradesh, through the Secr^tary, Department of Harijan and Tribal Welfare, Valiabh Bhawan, Bhopai (MP). 2) Commissioner/Djrector of Tribai VVeifare, Govt. of .Madhya Pradesh, Bhopa! (MP). 3) Regiona! Deputy Director, Tribai Harijan and Bac^vard Classes, Government of Madhya Pradesh, Jai Vihar Cotony, Ralpur (MP). 4) Commissioner (Revenue) Raipur, Revenue Djvision, Raipur (MP). Respondents T. (Writ Petitlon underArticie 226 ofthe Constltutipn of Indta) SB:. Hon'bte . SatisSi K. Agiiihotri, »1. Preseiit: Shri Ancop Majumdar, counsei for the petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panei Lawyer forthe State. Raju ORALORDER' (Passed on 18^-^»8) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that in the tight of indraveer Singh Tomar Vs. State ofM.P.and others (2004 (2) MPHT 3 (NOC), the petitloner seeks permlsston of thls Court to make a j^presentation before the concerned authorities, to which iearned oounsel appearing for the respondents/State has no objedion. 2) sn the event, a r^presentation is made, the respondent-authorittes may consider the same, in accordance with taw, on its own merit, wlthin a period of eight weeks from the receipt ofthe representation, Ifany. 3) The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the above stated libeity. No order asto costs. 1 Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge