1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1464 OF 2010 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s | orders orders | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. A.D. Sugdare, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and 3. Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, AND S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 24TH FEBRUARY, 2010 Heard Counsel for the parties. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing at admission stage. 2. The petitioner through Counsel states that the petitioner would not press the relief in terms of prayer 2 clause (B) as claimed. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the objection filed by the petitioner has been rejected on 27-01-2010 without recording any reason whatsoever. The order Exhibit-E reinforces that position. The Collector who was expected to decide the objection, ought to have recorded the reason for rejecting the objection. 3. In the circumstances, we set aside the impugned decision of the Collector dated 27-01-2010 and relegate the petitioner before the Collector for reconsideration of the objection and to pass fresh order recording reason for rejection of the objection. That be done within one week from today as final notification to declare the election programme is likely to be issued shortly. All questions are left open. 4. The petition is disposed of 3 accordingly. Rule is made absolute on the above terms. ( S.S. SHINDE, J. ) (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.) sut/FEB10/wp1464.10