IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 10127/2008 Decided on:9.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Pyare Lal. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Nemo. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for respondents No.1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). By the medium of this petition, petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents to consider his case for regularization. He was engaged in the year 1990. He has worked for ten years continuously and has completed 240 days in each calendar year except in the year 1998. He has worked only for 159 days in the year 1998. The shortage of working days in the year 1998 could either be due to 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 cessation of work or shortage of funds or due to illness of the petitioner. Respondents by taking a sympathetic view ought to have considered the case of the petitioner for regularization after condoning the shortage of 81 days in the year 1998. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization after condoning the shortage of 81 days in the year 1998. Needful be done within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 9.12.2010 *awasthi*