IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.255 of 2008 SURESH SINGH ….Petitioner Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Reema Devi, wife of Suresh Singh …opposite parties For the petitioner : Mr.Deepak Kumar For the State : Mr.J. Upadhyaya,APP For o.p.no.2 :Mr.Jai Prakash Verma ----------- 03. 30.08.2010 Heard. Petitioner is the husband and is aggrieved by the order dated 18.12.2007, passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur in M.C.No.2 of 2001(Rima Devi vs. Suresh Singh). Learned counsel for o.p.no.2 placed before this court the impugned order, particularly the findings recorded at paragraph 7. It is contended that on a consideration of the evidence adduced on behalf of the parties, the court below has found certain contradictions in evidence with regard to actual earning of the husband and thus the claim made by the applicant wife for a sum of Rs.2000/- was reduced to Rs.1500/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the maintenance amount paid under the impugned order is on higher side. By the order impugned, a sum of Rs.1500/- has been directed to be paid from the date of the order as maintenance by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur. I have perused the impugned order. 2 Learned court below carefully appraised the evidence and the materials on record and has come to the conclusion that the petitioner has adequate income and, accordingly, a sum of Rs.1500/- was directed to be paid as maintenance to the wife. This Court does not find any impropriety and/or illegality in the order meriting interference. The application is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )