IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2010 / 20TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).NO. 18473 OF 2006(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- DILEEP, S/O.BHASKARAN, RESIDING AT SHOBHARA MANDIRAM, PUTHUKKATTUMURI, CHAVARA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.RAJAN VELLOTH SRI.SAIJO HASSAN SRI.SABU SREEDHARAN SRI.VIMAL KUMAR.A.V. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHAVARA. 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM. 4. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.B.JAYASURYA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/08/2010, THE COURT ON 11/08/2010 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).NO. 18473 OF 2006 :: :: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS 3 AND 4 DATED 10.4.2006. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //true copy// P.S. To Judge SK/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.18473 of 2006 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of August, 2010 JUDGMENT writ petition has been filed for issuing appropriate direction or order to the superior police officials, respondents 3 and 4, to conduct an enquiry over Ext.P1 complaint filed by the petitioner alleging police brutality by the 2nd respondent, a Sub Inspector of police. His case, in brief, was that owing to previous enmity, a false case was booked against him while he was travelling as a passenger in an autorickshaw, imputing that with the co-passenger and the driver, all the three in a drunken condition had caused public nuisance. The 2nd respondent had also assaulted him was his further complaint. The writ petition being admitted and notice given, a counter statement has been filed by the Circle Inspector of Police, Chavara Police Station, Chavara. In the report, it has been stated that an enquiry has been conducted over Ext.P1 complaint in which the petitioner failed to co-operate. The autorickshaw driver participated in the enquiry and it is submitted that he had no complaint of any W.P.(C)No.18473 of 2006 :: 2 :: harassment by the 2nd respondent during his arrest. At the time of hearing of the writ petition, it has been conceded that the crime case registered against the petitioner, the co-passenger and also the driver, had ended in their conviction. It is also conceded that the petitioner had pleaded guilty of the offence. In such circumstances, I find, invoking the writ jurisdiction of this court for issuing any direction or order, as requested by the petitioner is uncalled for. Writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN) JUDGE sk/- /true copy//