IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M 7684 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 16, 2010 Jaswinder Singh alias Lakhi .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.J.S.Attar, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondent nos.1 to 4 to trace out the son of the petitioner, who is missing. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioner will be satisfied if respondent no.4, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 12.1.2009, Annexure P2, already made to him by the petitioner. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.4, i.e.,Senior Superintendent of Police,Gurdaspur, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 12.1.2009, Annexure P2, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioner. 16.3.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge