IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 7622 of 2003 Between: 1. P. Srinivasa Rao, S/o P. Bhaskar Rao,. Aged 30 years, Occ Clerk, Mustikuntla PACS, Mustikuntla, Krishna District. 2. R. Manga Lakshmi, W/o Nageswara Rao, Aged 27 years, Occ Clerk, Mustikuntla PACS, Mustikuntla, Krishna District. 3. K. Surya Rao, S/o Laxmaiah, Vavilala PACS, Vavilala, Krishna District. 4. P. Koteswara Rao, S/o Venkateswara Rao, Vavilala PACS, Vavilala, Krishna District. 5. R. Narasaiah, S/o Venkataiah, Vavilala PACS, Vavilala, Krishna District. 6. S. Sreenivasa Reddy, S/o Venkata Reddy, Tekulapalli PACS, Tekulapalli, Krishna District. 7. P. Venkateswarlu, S/o Ramulu, Munukollu PACS, Munukollu, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Commissioner for Cooperation, Government of A.P., Hyderabad. 2. The District Cooperative Officer, Krishna District at Machilipatnam. 3. The Divisional Cooperative Officer, Nuzvid, Krishna District 4. The Mustikuntla PACS, Mustikuntla, Krishna District rep. By its Chairman/PIC 5. The Vavilala PACS, Vavilala, Krishna District rep. By its Chairman/PIC 6. The Tekulapalli PACS, Tekulapalli, Krishna District rep. By its Chairman/PIC 7. The Munukollu PACS, Munukollu Krishna District rep by its Chairman/PIC .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the 3rd respondent in issuing proceedings Rc.NO. 2944/98-C, dated 17.2.2003 and consequential action of the respondents 4 to 7 societies in taking steps for terminating the service of the petitioners as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Atc. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India apart from contrary to the judgment in Basudeo Tiwary Vs. Sido Kanhu University reported in 1988 AIR SCW 3186 and consequently set aside the same and pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.V.SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/s submits that this Writ petition is covered by the judgment of this Court in W.P.No. 3171 of 2003 and batch dated 30.8.2004. Following the same, this Writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Tjs 07.09.2004. To 1. The Commissioner for Cooperation, Government of A.P., Hyderabad. 2. The District Cooperative Officer, Krishna District at Machilipatnam. 3. The Divisional Cooperative Officer, Nuzvid, Krishna District 4. The Mustikuntla PACS, Mustikuntla, Krishna District rep. By its Chairman/PIC 5. The Vavilala PACS, Vavilala, Krishna District rep. By its Chairman/PIC 6. The Tekulapalli PACS, Tekulapalli, Krishna District rep. By its Chairman/PIC 7. The Munukollu PACS, Munukollu Krishna District rep by its Chairman/PIC 8. 2CCs to G.P. for Cooperation, High Court Buildings, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 9. 2CD copies.