IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2009 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 36087 of 2009(E) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. M.S. ALEXANDER, MADATHIL RAJ BHAVAN, VADAKKUMTHALA, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. ALEXANDER DANIEL, -DO- -DO- BY ADV. MR.B.BIPIN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. PANMANA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PANMANA, EDAPPALLYKOTTA P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SECRETARY, PANMANA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PANMANA, EDAPPALLYKOTTA P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.36087 of 2009-E = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 15th day of December, 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioners' complaint is that appropriate action is not being taken by the respondents on Ext.P1 representation. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents, on notice, states that appropriate action will follow on Ext.P1 in accordance with law after hearing the necessary parties. Let this be done and a final decision taken within an outer limit of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. All contentions on merits left open. The writ petition ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/2312