IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.21517 of 2008 Date of Decision: April 17, 2009 Rekha Sharma .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Union Territory, Chandigarh & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs. Lisa Gill, Advocate, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. K.K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) Learned counsel for respondent No.4 i.e. the Society, contends that the name of the petitioner has already been substituted after Harsimran Kaur (the earlier member) has taken refund. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in view of the statement of learned counsel for respondent No.4, no cause of action survives and the petition has been rendered infructuous. The petition is disposed of as CWP No.21517 of 2008 [2] infructuous on the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner. It is, however, made clear that the order would not, in any way, impede the jurisdiction of the authorities to approve or raise objections to the action of the Society in introducing the name of the petitioner by substitution. (AJAI LAMBA) April 17, 2009 JUDGE avin