FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3679 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3678 OF 2009 [Vinod s/o Atmaram Talreja vs Needs Agencies, through its proprietor, Mohd. Nasiruddin s/o Mohd. Usmanoddin] _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Shri Shailendra Gangakhedkar, advocate for the applicant Shri S.S.Chapalgaonker, advocate for respondent ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 8 th April, 2011. PER COURT :- 1 Heard Shri Shailendra Gangakhedkar, advocate for the applicant and Shri S.S.Chapalgaonker, advocate for respondent. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 14 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Application seeking leave to file appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 13.7.2009, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, in Criminal Revision No. 11 of 2007. 3 Shri S.S.Chapalgaonker, learned counsel for the respondent opposed the application vehemently and submitted that the present bears no substance and same is devoid of any merits and same be dismissed. (2) 4 For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily and it further appears that the delay caused in filing the accompanying application is not willful, deliberate and intentional and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 5 Hence, present Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 14 days caused in filing the accompanying application seeking leave to file appeal stands condoned and present application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) dbm/crap3679.09