IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 114 OF 2007 MR ANTONIO CAETANO JOSE DOS REIS DO ROSARIO ROCHA MELO AND ANR., ... Appellants Versus ERIC FERNANDES ... Respondent Ms. Asha Dessai,Adovocate for he appellants. Mr. T. George John, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- R. C. CHAVAN, J. Date:- 13th August, 2008 P.C. This appeal takes exception to the order whereby the learned Civil Judge, S. D., Mhapusa has rejected the appellants' plaintiffs' application for injunction to restrain the defendants from alienating the property, creating third party interest or raising construction over the property. There is no dispute that the appellant has actually sold the property for valuable consideration of Rs.12,50,000/-. The appellant contended that he had been duped in accepting paltry sum for a valuable property. The learned trial judge cannot be faulted for having refused to issue injunction, since after having executed registered sale deed, the appellant would not be in position to restrain the activities of the respondent to deal with the properties which he has purchased. Appellant's interest can be secured by registering the lis under section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. As far as any construction, which may be raised during the pendency of litigation, the respondent may be put to notice that he will not be able to claim any equities in respect of such construction, as may be put up during the pendency of the litigation. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. R. C. CHAVAN, J. SMA