IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 27TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 8TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 1901 of 2009(B) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- N.SUNDARAMOORTHY,S/O.K.C.NATESAN, ARAMGAM ROAD, ILAYA BHAGAVATHIKAVU, THATHAMANGALAM, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K. SRI.LIJU. M.P RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CHITTUR-TATTMANGALAM MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD.REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, CHITTUR TATTAMANG ALAM MUNICIPALITY, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD. ADV. SRI.A.SREERAMAKRISHNAN FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: W.P.C.NO. 1901/2009 ------------------------------------------------------------------- EXT.P1 COPY OF OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE DT. 9-2-2005. EXT.P2 BUILDING TAX RECEIPT. EXT.P3 NO OBJECTION LETTER DT. 24-9-2007. EXT.P4 LICENCE DT. 4-3-2008. EXT.P5 NOTICE DT. 16-4-2008. EXT.P6 ELECTRICITY BILL DT. 12-11-2008. EXT.P7 REPLY DT. 17-4-2008. EXT.P8 TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT. EXT.P9 ORDER DT. 6-5-2008. EXT.P10 APPEAL DT. 27-8-2008. EXT.P11 APPLICATION DT. 27-8-08. EXT.P12 POSTAL RECEIPT DT. 23-8-08. EXT.P13 NOTICE DT. 20-10-08. EXT.P14 REPLY DT. 24-10-08. EXT.P15 RECEIPT DT. 24-10-08. EXT.P16 COPY OF COMPLAINT. EXT.P17 PETITION DT. 11-11-08. EXT.P18 NOTICE DT. 15-11-08. EXT.P19 NOTICE DT. 25-11-08. EXT.P20 REPLY SUBMITTED TO EXT. P19. [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE. S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 1901 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 27th February, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner obtained Ext. P4 licence to conduct a poultry farm in a thatched shed. The 1st respondent cancelled Ext. P4 licence alleging that the thatched shed was put up without a building permit vide Ext. P9 order. In respect of the said subject matter, the petitioner has filed Exts.P10 and P11 before the 2nd respondent. 1st respondent has also issued Exts.P5 and P13 notices. The petitioner is challenging Exts. P9 order and P5 and P13 notices. However, for the present, the petitioner would be satisfied with a direction to the 1st respondent to pass appropriate orders pursuant to Exts.P.5 and P13 notices and also a direction to the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders on Exts. P10 and P11 expeditiously. 2. I have heard counsel for the respondents. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with the following directions: The 1st respondent shall pass appropriate orders pursuant to Exts.P.5 and P13 notices as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. There would be another direction to the 2nd respondent to pass orders on Exts.P10 and P11, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/