IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 1048 of 2008 Dr. N.D. Arora …….. Petitioner Versus State & Ors. …….. Respondents Naveen Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. B. S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for respondent no. 3. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Naveen Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Learned Brief Holder for the state submits before this Court that it has been indicated in paragraph- 2 of the short counter affidavit that the police has completed the investigation and after completion of investigation the police has found that there is a prima-facie case against the petitioner, and as such the police has submitted the chargesheet before the Circle Officer concerned. It was further submitted that in view of above the writ petition filed by petitioner seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him has, now, become infructuous. As such, the police is likely to submit the charge-sheet before the court concerned in the near future. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. However, interim order dated 29.12.2008 shall remain operative till the chargesheet is filed before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 09.04.2009 LSR/ Virendra