1 Criminal Application No.4659 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4659 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.124 OF 2011 1. Laxmikant S/o.Nemichand Jain, Age-45 years, Occu-Business, R/o.Shriram Mandir Chowk, Velodge, Tq.Chopda, Dist. Jalgaon APPLICANT VERSUS 1. State of Maharashtra 2. Shriram Kanhyalal Agrawal, Age-68 years, Occu-Business, R/o.Gandhi Chowk, Raver, Tq.Raver, Dist. Jalgaon RESPONDENTS Mr.K.C.Sant, learned counsel for the applicant. Mr.S.D.Kaldate, learned A.P.P. for respondent State. Mr.M.K.Goyanka, learned counsel for respondent no.2. (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 20/10/2011 PER COURT : 1. A joint application is moved before this Court by the revision applicant in Cri.Rev.Appl.No.124/2011 and by the respondent no. 2/original complainant in SCC No.1127/2002, on whose complaint, an offence was registered against the present applicant for the offence punishable u/s. 138 of The N.I.Act, in which the revision applicant 2 Criminal Application No.4659 of 2011 was convicted by the learned J.M.F.C. Raver and was sentenced to suffer SI for 6 months with directions to pay the compensation in the sum of Rs.2,83,220/-, vide judgment and order dated 23/09/2005, which order came to be confirmed in Criminal Appeal No.147/2005, by judgment and order dated 02/05/2011 by the Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, to grant leave to compound the offence punishable u/s. 147 of The N.I.Act, as now u/s. 147 of The N.I.Act, the offence punishable u/s. 138 of The N.I.Act is made compoundable. They have also prayed that the amount deposited by the revision applicant in the court below, to be disbursed to the respondent no.2. 2. As the parties have settled their dispute outside the court, there shall not be any impediment in allowing this application. In view of this, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause A,B and C and stands disposed of. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/OCT.2011/cri.appl.4659-11