CR No. 1296 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CR No. 1296 of 2009 Date of decision March 9, 2009 Sant Singh and others ....... Petitioners Versus Ranjit Singh and another ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Vivek Suri, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The revision is directed against the order passed by the Court below directing the defendant to produce the entire evidence on 13.3.2009 at their own responsibility. Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to an application alleged to have been filed on 24.2.2009 seeking to examine five official witnesses and that application has not been ordered by the Court only because there had been an earlier direction on 17.2.2009 that the witness shall be brought on the own responsibility of the defendants. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will have no evidence except tendering official witnesses and seeks for an opportunity that the Court below may issue appropriate summons when a suitable application is presented. Admittedly there is no application pending before the Court below for issuance of summons and if such application is filed, the Court below will consider the same on its own merits CR No. 1296 of 2009 2 and issue appropriate directions for summoning the witness. 3. The Civil revision is disposed of in the above terms. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 9, 2009 archana