1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No. 292/2008 in Writ Petition No. 3767/1999 (d) Prabhakar Damduji Kamble ..vs.. The Member, Industrial Court, Amravati & Ors. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Mahajan, Advocate for the appellant CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA AND C. L. PANGARKAR, JJ. DATED : 23 rd September, 2008 The appellant being aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Single Judge whereby order dated 15.03.1999 passed by the Industrial Court, Amravati dismissing the complaint has been maintained after considering the submissions raised by the appellant basically that he was in service for more than 15 years. The fact remains that on the date of application/ advertisement, the other respondent no. 2 was considered on merits including the qualification, which was better than the appellant, as observed by the learned Single 2 Judge himself that the appellant did not possess requisite experience and, therefore, dismissed the writ petition. We see there is no case made out by the appellant. The Letters Patent Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE kahale