^ L SINGLE BENCH IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. \5 / 2011 PETITIONER .-^•^. ^^^ ^^y-y ^s^<>> ..-'jy^'yy" / Smt. Suja Vijayan W/o Shri V.S. Vijayan, Aged about 43 years, Occupation - Lecturer, .Govt. Higher Secondary School Marra Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS ^- RESPONDENTS ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur ^ (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) WRIT PETITIONUNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA fl HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR SiNQLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI PRASHANT KUMAR IWISHRA. J. PETITIONER W.P.(SlNo.515of2011 Smt. Suja Vijayan. Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others. WRiT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Appearance: Shri Vipin Tiwari.counset for petitioner. Shri Yashwarit Slngh, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORALORDER {31ffl1Q011) Following oral order PrashantKumar Mishra. J. Heard. of the Court was passed by (2) Learned counsel appearing for t'ne petitioner submits that the petitioner is.entitled to benefit of two advance inerements on account of she having passed B.Ed. examination before her appointmentat her own cost. it is submitted that the issue invotved in the present petition is no longer res Jn^raand thesame has been finally decided bytheHon'ble Supreme Court in thecase of Asha Saxena vs. State of M.P.& Ore., reported in 2009 (II!) MPJR(5C) 59. (3) It is further submitted that this Court has also taken a similar view in its order dated 06/02/2009 passed in W.P. (S) No. 6257 of 2008. Learned counsei for the petitioner further draws attention of this Court to order dated 29/04/2010 passed in Writ Appeai No. 124 of 2009, whereln relyjng upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the order passed by this Court in another_Writ Appeal No. 87/2009, directions have been issued for consideration ofthe 1case for grant of two advance increments as per cireUlar dated j 21/09/1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of jthefacts pieadedinthe petition. liiUIBiBlinnu 9^3' 3.- (4) Learned counsel for the respondents submits that case of the petitioner would aiso be considered on the same lines. (5) In view of the statement made above, this petition is finally disposed offwitha direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the ciaim of the petitioner for grant of two advance inGrement as per circular dated21/re/1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of the facts pleaded in the petition within a period of eight weeks from today. ____S___._—— Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge 't