IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 1890 of 2009 Between: 1 Nandamudi Samuel S/o. Chenchaiah R/o. N.G.Os., Colony, Podili, Prakasam Dist. 2 Nandamudi Leela Prasanna S/o. Samuel R/o. N.G.Os., Colony, Podili, Prakasam Dist. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The State Rep. by the Principal Secretary to Govt. of A.P. Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent of Police Prakasam Dist. at Ongole. 3 The Station House Officer I Town Police Station Ongole, Prakasam Dist. 4 Kancherla Prasada Rao S/o. Venkaiah R/o.Pandaripuram, Plot No.203, Vasavi Residency, Ongole, Prakasam Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction particularly in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, declaring the inaction of the 2nd & 3rd respondents in not initiating enquiry upon the complaint dated 1-1-2009 of the petitioner as illegal, void, arbitrary and violating the provisions Under Section 154 Cr.P.C. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.V.R.AVULA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.1890 of 2009 ORDER: According to the 1st petitioner, he got enrolled the name of his son, the 2nd petitioner, as member of Sri Venkatata Ramana Real Estate, Ongole, through the 4th respondent, on 05.04.1990. Thereupon, on behalf of the 2nd petitioner, who was minor, the 1st petitioner paid a total sum of Rs.10,800/- towards the cost of the plot in Sri Venkata Ramana Real Estate, in equal monthly instalments of Rs.300/- per month for 36 months, and also paid Rs.1,050/- towards registration expenses, by the time the scheme was closed in the year 1993. While so, when the petitioner approached the office of the said Real Estate in the month of June, 1993, he found the office closed and, on enquiry, he came to know that the business itself was closed down by the Management. Thereafter, he could trace out the address of the 4th respondent and when he questioned the 4th respondent regarding the registration of the plot in the name of the 2nd petitioner, the 4th respondent abused him in unparliamentary language and threatened him with dire consequences, as such, he gave a complaint on 01.01.2009 to the 3rd respondent, a copy of which was marked to the 2nd respondent, with sufficient material showing that he was cheated by the 4th respondent in the guise of Sri Venkata Ramana Real Estate. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he gave a complaint against the 4th respondent to the 2nd and 3rd respondents, but so far no action has been taken thereon. Hence, this writ petition. Today, learned Government Pleader for Home submits that after filing of the writ petition, a case in Crime No.47 of 2009 of P.S.Ongole Town, has been registered against the 4th respondent, basing on the complaint given by the petitioner, and a copy of the First Information Report in the said crime has been filed before this Court. Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA,J 12.02.2009 v v