IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49832 of 2007 CHANCHAL YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 8.5.2008 Ravi/- The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Majhoulia P.S. Case No. 111 of 2007 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard both sides. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide Annexure-2 there is also a counter case lodged by the petitioner’s side against the members of the prosecution party with regard to the same false offence. It is submitted that the petitioner along with others is named in the F.I.R. The learned counsel submits that there is no allegation on the petitioner that he caused any assault to anybody and that his name occurs in the last line of the fardbeyan with this allegation that he is the root cause of the occurrence. The learned counsel says that the petitioner is a retired government servant and his name is added in the F.I.R. out of the grudge. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, the petitioner, Chanchal Yadav is admitted to bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, in Majhoulia P.S. Case No. 111 of 2007 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (C. M. Prasad,J.)