wp4921.10 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4921 OF 2010 Aksa Education and Welfare Trust, Beed ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents ..... Mr. S.G. Sangle, advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.V. Kurundkar, Addl. GP. for respondent No. 1 and 2 Mr. V.C. Patil h/f Mr. U.B. Bondar, Adv. for respondent No.3 ..... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 8TH JULY, 2011 PER COURT:- 1 The petitioner was refused the permission to start a new Urdu medium primary school in village Chinchala, Tq. Wadwani, District Beed. The reasons for refusal were that the petitioner had not disclosed the audited accounts of the institution and that the undertaking to the effect that the petitioner was willing to run the school on permanent no grant basis, was not annexed to the proposal. The proposal submitted was for the academic year 2008-2009. wp4921.10 -2- 2 In our opinion, therefore, we need not consider whether that proposal was made in accordance with law. The petitioner may submit a fresh proposal with all requisite particulars and documents. If such a proposal is submitted, the State will consider the same in accordance with law and the prevailing policy. The petition is disposed of accordingly. ( M. T. JOSHI, J.) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) rlj/