[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVN.APPLN.NO.625 OF 2007 Jaysing Vithoba Dhavade ..Applicant Vs. Santosh Narayan Gavade and Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.A.P.Kulkarni advocate for applicant Mr.S.S.Pednekar A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : AUGUST 20, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 20, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 20, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 24.8.2007 passed by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No. 33 of 2006, the applicant-original complainant has filed this revision. By the said judgment and order, the Respondents-accused were acquitted under Sections 302, 304-B and 498-A r.w. 34 of IPC. 2. It may be stated here that the State of Maharashtra had also filed an application for leave to file appeal against the very same judgment and order of acquittal. The said application was [-2-] numbered as Criminal Application No.3913 of 2007. The Division Bench of this Court by order dated 17.1.2008 observed that it was not a fit case to grant leave to file appeal against the acquittal and accordingly, the application came to be dismissed by the Division Bench. Looking to the above facts, I am not inclined to interfere with the judgment and order of acquittal, hence, revision is rejected. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]