IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51832 of 2008 DINESH YADAV @ DINESH KUMAR YADAV @ FULENDRA YADAV, son of Sh. Satto Yadav alias Satnarain Yadav, resident of village – Mahinath Nagar, P.S. Beldaur, District - Khagaria Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 28.1.2009 Heard. The case is under section 302 etc. I.P.C. and section 27 of Arms Act and petitioner is not named in the FIR. Two paragraphs have been cited in the rejection order with the materials which could be contained in them. Paragraph 45 is the statement of Dahlu Yadav who claims seeing the petitioner running away with arms. Paragraph 46 contains the further statement of the informant who claimed, after six days of the occurrence, to have identified the petitioner by his voice. The simple contention is that in either of the cases, it was expected that the name of the petitioner ought to have been mentioned in either of the connections in the very FIR. Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of 2 Rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Khagaria in Beldaur P.S. Case no. 54 of 2008. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )