IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12416 of 2010 AMBIKA MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Sheel Bhadar Jha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Arun Kr. Pandey, A.P.P. --------------- 2 7.5.2010 Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution for offence under section 498 A and some other allied offences under Penal Code as also u/s 3 / 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, the petitioner is elder brother of the husband of one Binita Devi daughter of the informant. Allegation of demand of dowry and torture is almost general and omnibus against all the accused persons. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that even according to the prosecution case primal role is assigned to the husband of the alleged victim, who has been taken into judicial custody. Taking into consideration the fact that husband of the alleged victim is already in jail, and petitioner being elder brother of the husband of the victim, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, the above named petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Jehanabad in connection with Karpi P.S. Case no. 22 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J. ) M.Rahman