IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 28TH AUGUST 2009 / 6TH BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 25185 of 2009(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- MS.EXCELLENT TIMBER IMPORTS & EXPORTS (P LTD, UNIVERSITY ROAD, RAMANATTUKARA CALICUT BY MANAGING DIRECTOR V.MAMMU. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAGHUNATH SRI.PREMJIT NAGENDRAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SPECIAL CIRCLE II KOZHIKODE. 2. THE SPECIAAL TEAM U/S 17 D OF KGST ACT REP BY ASST. COMMISSIONER SPECIAL CIRCLE II KOZHICODE. 3. THE SALES TAX OFFICER (RECOVERY) O/O. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPT KOZHIKODE. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. MR. C.K. GOVINDAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ........................................................................ W.P.(C) 25185 OF 2009 ......................................................................... Dated this the 28th August, 2009 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner is that in view of the obvious mistakes contained in Exts.P5 and P6 orders passed by the Fast Track Team, the petitioner has already approached the concerned authority, the first respondent by filing Ext. P7 application for rectification of the mistakes invoking the relevant provisions under the Statute and that it is without any regard to the pendency of the said proceedings that the respondents are proceeding with coercive steps for realisation of the amount allegedly due from the petitioner, as borne by Ext.P8, which in turn is sought to be intercepted in this Writ Petition. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the first respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P7 application for rectification, in accordance with law, W.P.(C) 25185 OF 2009 2 after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, which shall be finalised as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment . It is made clear that till such orders are passed on Ext.P7, all further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P8 shall be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk