IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5296 of 2010 SAKALDEO SHARMA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 03.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No body appears on behalf of the State. Petitioner is facing accusations under diverse sections of the Arms Act. His prayer for grant of bail was earlier considered and rejected by order dated 17.7.2009 (Annexure-1). The concluding portion of the order reads thus: “The petitioner Sakaldeo Sharma of Cr. Misc. No. 23270 of 2009 is, however, granted liberty to renew his prayer for bail after five months if in the meanwhile the case is not taken up for hearing.” Learned counsel, referring to the impugned order, submits that till today only one witness has been examined. He does submit that the trial is not likely to be concluded in near future. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court V in connection with S.T. no. 472 of 2009 (arising out of Nayaramnagar P.S. case no. 120 of 2005) subject to the following conditions: (i) one of the bailers should be the own/close family members of the petitioner. 2 (ii) Petitioner shall appear in person on each and every date fixed in the Court below. In case of default on two consecutive occasions without any cogent/satisfactory reason, the bail bond of the petitioner shall be cancelled and thereafter the Trial Court will be at liberty to secure his arrest in accordance with law. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )