IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.4890 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.11.2011 Navdeep Kaushal & others -----Petitioners Vs. Roop Lal & another -----Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present:- Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.K. Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1.. --- RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J. 1. This is tenants’ revision petition challenging the impugned orders of eviction passed the appellants by the authorities below. 2. On August 30, 2011, this Court has passed the following order:- “At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that if the petitioners are granted two years’ time, they shall hand over the vacant possession of the premises in question to the respondent-landlord on expiry of such a period if granted. C.R. No.4890 of 2011 To explore the aforesaid possibility, let notice be issued to the respondent-landlord for 12.9.2011. Dasti.” 3. Shri P.K. Gupta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 after taking instructions from Shri Sham Sunder son of the respondent-landlord states that the respondent has no objection if any reasonable time is given to the petitioner- tenants to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlord. 4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, a consensus has reached between both the counsel for the parties that this petition be dismissed and petitioners be granted time to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises upto 31.12.2012, subject to the condition that the petitioner-tenants shall make the payment of arrears of rent, if any, within two months from today and shall keep on paying the entire future rent in advance by the 10th of every month and also that they will file an undertaking before the Rent Controller within one month from today to the aforesaid effect and that they will hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent- landlord on or before the expiry of the time granted by this Court. 5. Thus, this petition is dismissed. The petitioners are granted time to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises upto 31.12.2012, subject to the condition that they will make the payment of arrears of rent, if any, within two months 2 C.R. No.4890 of 2011 from today and shall keep on paying the entire future rent in advance by the 10th of every month and also that they will file an undertaking before the Rent Controller within one month from today to the aforesaid effect and that they will hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent- landlord on or before the expiry of the time granted by this Court. 6. In case of any violation of the aforesaid conditions, the eviction order shall come into force immediately. It is also made clear that if the petitioners fail to hand over the vacant possession to the respondent-landlord, as stipulated above, the respondent-landlord may initiate contempt proceedings against him, in addition to execution of the impugned order. November 28, 2011 ( RAKESH KUMAR GARG ) ak JUDGE 3