1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEPT PETITION NO.112 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.32 OF 2009 Pratap Lal Teli and Anr. ...Petitioners vs. Slum Rehabilitation Authority ...Respondent Ms Kiran Bhalerao a/w Mr.M.P.Bhalerao for the petitioners Mr.G.D.Utangale i/b Mr.Utangale & Co. for respondent CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 27, 2009 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the reply filed by the respondent. In the reply it is stated that the first respondent considered the application for regularisation. It is further stated that by communication dated 26th August 2009 sent by the respondent to the Principal Secretary to the Urban Development Department of Government of Maharashtra, a request has been made for grant of permission for consumption of FSI up to 3.00. As of today, it appears that the respondent has taken steps for complying with the order of the Division Bench dated 8th June 2009. Therefore, no case is made out as of today to take action either under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 or Article 215 of the Constitution of India. Petition is accordingly disposed of by keeping the rights and contentions of the parties open. JUDGE