1 Ash IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9647 OF 2010 The Ajara Urban Co­op. Bank Ltd. .. Petitioner Vs Ahamadsaheb Mohd. Pathan & Ors. .. Respondents ­­ Shri A.A. Kumbhakoni i/by Shri Sathyam Acharya for the Petitioner. Shri Ganesh Gole for Respondent No.1. Ms Marushka Furtado i/by Shri Rui A. Rodriques for Respondent No.3. Shri A.I. Patel, AGP for Respondent No.6. ­­ CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 22ND DECEMBER, 2010 P.C: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. The question is whether on the basis of the allegations made by the 1st Respondent in his application dated 26th April, 2010, the power under Section 89A of the Maharashtra Co­operative Societies Act, 1960 ( hereinafter referred to as “the said Act” ) can be exercised. Learned counsel appearing for the 1st Respondent on instructions states that instead of keeping the Petition pending in this Court, the Revision Application preferred by the Petitioner may be remitted to the Revisional Authority for fresh hearing. 2. The suggestion made by the 1st Respondent deserves to be accepted. It will have to be made clear that the issue of applicability of 2 Section 89­A of the said Act will have to be gone into by the Revisional Authority. 3. Hence, the Petition is disposed of by passing the following order. ORDER (i) The impugned order dated 21st October, 2010 is quashed and set aside and the Revision Application No. 363 of 2010 is restored to the file of the Revisional Authority. (ii) The Revisional Authority to decide the Revision Application afresh in the light of the observations made in this order. (iii) Earlier interim order dated 13th July, 2010 passed in Revision Application will continue to operate till the Revision Application is decided. (iv) The Revision Application shall be decided as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months from today. (v) The Revisional Authority to act upon an authenticated 3 copy of this order. (A.S.OKA, J)