IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7338 of 2011 RAM PRAVESH KEWAT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 08.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. There is specific allegation against the petitioner that he opened fire as a result of which deceased sustained fire arm injury and while he was being taken to the hospital, he died on his way. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 11.08.2009 and, as a matter of fact, nephew of the deceased was a man of bad habits and he used to tease the niece of the petitioner and also used to urinate in front of the house of the petitioner. It is further contended by him that, as a matter of fact, on account of the aforesaid acts of above stated nephew of the deceased, a quarrel took place between the parties and that is the reason of false implication of the petitioner in the alleged crime. Although, learned counsel for the petitioner made elaborate arguments touching almost all the features of the evidence of present case but I am not, at all, convinced with his submission. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Islampur P.S. Case No. 12 of 2009, stands rejected. So far as the period of custody of the petitioner is 2 concerned, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )