IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.22218 of 2011 Date of Decision : November 30, 2011. Parveen Kumar .....Petitioner versus Board of School Education, Haryana .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sandeep Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.Charanji Lal, Advocate for Mr.Rajesh Sheoran, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-Board. Let a copy of the writ petition be handed over to learned counsel for the respondent-Board during the course of day. In the peculiar facts and circumstances, no reply is required to be filed by the Board at this stage. The petitioner moved an application for correction of the name of his father in his Middle Standard Examination certificate/Secondary Certificates as according to him, the correct name of his father is 'Pala Ram' CWP No.22218 of 2011 [2] and not 'Shish Pal' as mentioned in the said certificates. The petitioner's application has been rejected by the Board on 5.3.2009 (Annexure P-5) on the plea that he “failed to deposit the requisite fee for a period of one year”. The petitioner's grievance is that he was never asked to deposit any fee. Since the petitioner has no objection and he is willing to deposit the requisite fee as demanded by the Board for correction of the name of his father in the certificates, the writ petition is allowed; the order dated 5.3.2009 is set-aside and the respondent-Board is directed to re- consider the petitioner's request in accordance with its rules/regulations after giving an opportunity to him to deposit the requisite fee. The needful shall be done within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Dasti. November 30, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE