IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID TUESDAY, THE 15TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 24TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 30194 of 2011(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- DR.BIJU RAMESH, MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S RAJADHANI HOTELS (P) LTD., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. MR.M.R.ANANDAKUTTAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THE CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003. 2. THE REGIONAL TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 003. ADV.MR.P.K.MANOJ KUMAR, SC FOR R1 GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.MUHAMMED SHAFI FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 30194 of 2011(Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: PERMIT NO.BAP/3142/2000 DTD. 1.7.2003. EXT.P2: CERTIFICATE OF RENEWING THE LICENCE DTD. 10.7.2006. EXT.P3: APPLICATION DTD. 19.3.2009. EXT.P4: REQUEST SO MADE TO R2 REGIONAL TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, TVM. EXT.P5: NOTICE ISSUED BY R1 ASSESSMENT WITH 7.6.2011 AS DATE RECEIVED ON 2.9.2011. EXT.P6: APPEAL NO.130713/2011. EXT.P7: DEMAND NOTICE DTD. 27.10.2011. EXT.P8: APPEAL NO.1924/2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL ..... // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No.30194 Of 2011 ---------------------- Dated this the 15th day of November, 2011. J U D G M E N T The writ petition is filed seeking to quash Exts.P5 assessment order and P7 demand notice, for a direction commanding the 1st respondent to dispose of Exts.P6 & P8 in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court and for other incidental reliefs. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against Ext.P5 assessment order Ext.P6 statutory appeal is pending consideration before the 1st respondent and requests this Court to issue a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P6 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, standing counsel and learned Government Pleader. In view of the fact that Ext.P6 statutory appeal is pending consideration before the 1st respondent, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and ::2:: W.P.(C).No.30194 Of 2011 pass appropriate orders on Ext.P6 appeal within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. All further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P7 shall be kept in abeyance till the disposal of Ext.P6 appeal. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-