1 APPA 405.11.sxw JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 405 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 834 OF 2009 Karan @ Basha Sham Pawar. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Mrs. Sarojini Upadhyay for the Appellant. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATED : 14th JULY 2011. P.C. :- Heard. 2. The Applicant prays for bail pending hearing and final disposal of an Appeal filed by him. The learned Advocate for the Applicant submitted that no role is attributed to the Applicant in the murderous assault on the deceased. There was darkness at the relevant time, therefore, identity of the Applicant could not be disclosed. The Applicant is innocent and he has been falsely roped into the case by the prosecution. 2 APPA 405.11.sxw 3. The learned APP has opposed the Bail Application. We have perused the evidence of PW-4 and PW-7 for the purposes of consideration of Bail Application. 4. The learned APP has drawn our attention to the observations of the Trial Court in respect of the role attributed to the Applicant. 5. We are convinced that the Applicant does not deserve to be released on Bail considering the nature of accusation and the role attributed to him in the present case. 6. Rejected. 7. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee to disburse fees to the learned Advocate for the Applicant. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.)