IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 15TH MARCH 2011 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1932 RP.No. 186 of 2011 ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.30071/2010 DATED 3.2.2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER ------------------------------------- P.I.FAROOK,AGED 45 YEARS,S/O.P.Y ISMAIL PULLUVALAPPIL HOUSE,PULLUPALAM, FORT KOCHI VILLAGE,FORT KOCHI-P.O, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.ALIAS M.CHERIAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDEDNTS: ------------------------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE,KOCHI 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MATTANCHERRY VILLAGE OFFICE, MATTANCHERRY,KOCHI 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MATTANCHERRY POLICE STATION, MATTANCHERRY,KOCHI 5. A.SAJITHA,AGED 46 YEARS, D/O.ABDUL RAHIMANKUTTY,DOOR NO.CC 54/1419, KOMPARAMUKKU,MATTANCHERRY, KOCHI,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. R1 TO R4 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENNY GERVACIS THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.Chelameswar, C.J. & P.R.Ramachandra Menon, J. ------------------------------------------ R.P.No.186 of 2011 in W.P.(C) No.30071 of 2010 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 15th day of March, 2011 ORDER J.Chelameswar, C.J. This review application is filed aggrieved by the judgment dated 3rd February, 2011 in W.P.(C) No.30071 of 2010. 2. The substance of the review application is that in the guise of the execution of the order of forfeiture of the property belonging to the 5th respondent under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 the official respondents are seeking to evict the petitioner herein from a piece of residential property which undoubtedly was purchased by the predecessor in title of the petitioner herein from the 5th respondent. But the petitioner claims that the property which fell to the share of the petitioner herein is not the property which was forfeited under the provisions of the above mentioned Act. 3. The judgment dated 3rd February, 2011 is very categoric that the writ petition was dismissed on the ground that R.P.No.186/2011 in WP(C) No.30071/2010 - 2 - this Court opined that the petitioner did not approach this Court with clean hands as there was no full disclosure of the material facts. 4. In the circumstances, irrespective of the truth of the claim made in the review petition, we see no reason to review the judgment under appeal. The review petition is therefore dismissed. J.Chelameswar, Chief Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon, Judge vns