IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 29TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 RFA.No. 128 of 2009() -------------------------- OS.358/2002 of ADDL.SUB COURT,KOLLAM .................... APPELLANT/DEFENDANT NO.7: ----------------------------------- RAJAN, RAJAS, VADASSERIKONAM P.O., THYCCADU, CHEMMARUTHI VILLAGE. BY ADVS. SRI.T.M.CHANDRAN SRI.S.SUJITH SRI.V.A.SASIDHARAN SRI.JOSEPH ALBIN NEDUNTHALLY RESPONDENT(S): PLAINTIFFS 1-8 & DEFENDANTS 1 TO 6: -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. J.SIVASANKARA PILLAI, MANJAVIL VEEDU, MANAYILKULANGARA, KOLLAM. 2. HEMA ANIL, MANJAVIL VEEDU, MANAYILKULANGARA, KOLLAM. 3. E.K.MOHANDAS, MANJAVIL VEEDU, MANAYILKULANGARA, KOLLAM. 4. RAJALEKSHMI, REMYA NIVAS, VALATHUNGAL, KOLLAM. 5. LEELA RAVEENDRANATH, DRISYA, ASRAMAM, KOLLAM. 6. JAYA VASUDEVAN, UTHRADAM, MYLAKKADU, KOLLAM. svs/ .......2/-.. ...2... 7. KALA MOHANDAS, MANJAVIL HOUSE, MANAYILKULANGARA, KOLLAM. 8. ANILKUMAR, MANJAVIL HOUSE, MANAYILKULANGARA, KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, HEMA ANIL. 9. AYYAPPA BANKERS, AYYAPPA FINANCIERS, PARAVOOR, KOLLAM. 10. RAJAGOPAL, PADMAVILASOM BUNGLOW, KURUMANDAL, PARAVOOR, (MANAGING PARTNER OF 1ST DEFENDANT FIRM). 11. SARADA DEVI, PADMAVILASOM BUNGLOW, KURUMANDAL, PARAVOOR. 12. VENUGOPAL, PADMAVILASOM BUNGLOW, KURUMANDAL, PARAVOOR. 13. AYYAPPA THIRUMENI, PADMAVILASOM BUNGLOW, KURUMANDAL, PARAVOOR. 14. BALAGOPAL, PADMAVILASOM BUNGLOW, KURUMANDAL, PARAVOOR. R1 TO 8 BY ADVS. SMT.T.S.MAYA (THIYADIL) SRI.P.R.PREMACHANDREN THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.F.A. No. 128 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 29th day of November, 2010. JUDGMENT Bhavadasan, J, The parties have entered into a compromise and filed a compromise petition reducing the terms into writing and pray that a decree in terms of the compromise may be passed. The petition is found to be proper. In the result, this appeal is disposed of as follows: 1) The decree and judgment of the lower court are set aside. 2) It is agreed between the parties that there have been full and final settlement of all claims between the parties, that is the claim of plaintiffs 1 to 8 in O.S. 358 of 2002 stands fully satisfied. RFA.128/2009. 2 3) Original plaintiffs 1 to 8 have withdrawn all the claims against document Nos. 2633/2002, 2654/2002 and 2655/2002 and accept that the assignments in favour of the seventh defendant are legally valid and binding. 4) One half of the court fee paid on the Memorandum of Appeal shall be refunded to the appellant. Communications may be sent to the Sub Registrar Office, Paravur. Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Judge P. Bhavadasan, Judge sb.