IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.1316-M of 2011 Date of Decision:11.3.2011 Bachitter Singh Aulakh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. P.P.S. Tung, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. H.S. Mann, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Reply filed on behalf of respondent No.4 is taken on record. Copy thereof has been handed over to the counsel opposite. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 not to harass the petitioner on false complaints given by respondent No.4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from ASI Harjit Singh states that complaints dated 9.3.2010 and 18.3.2011 were filed by respondent No.4 against the petitioner. The said complaints were inquired into but were found to be false. As such, the petitioner is not required by the Police Station Mehta. Accordingly, the present petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. 11.3.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE