,^— HIGH COURT OF CHHARTriSGARH AT BILASPUR Coram:- Hon'ble Shri Sunil Kumar Sinha & Hon'ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar. JJ \^ Petitioners II ^ W.P. (S) No. 6376/2010 1. Shriram Mandavi, S/o Mani Ram Mandavi, aged about 42 years, R/o Litipara, Chinwari, PO Kuraiha, Tah. Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari, Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra Litipara, Chinwari, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) 2. Ramcharan Mandavi, aged about 44 years, son of Shri Sukaiu Ram Mandavi, R/o Chinwari, PO Karaiha, Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra - Chinwari, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) 3. Jumman Singh Mandavi, aged about 40 years, son of Shri Ramdayal Mandavi, R/o Chinwari, Po Karaiha, Tah. Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari Shasklya Aupcharik Kendra Kukarikonha, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) 4. Chhannu Ram Yadav, age 33 years, S/o Shri Devi Singh Yadav, R/o Chinwari, Po Karaiha, Tah. Nagri, Dhamtari Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra - Chinwari, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) 5. Jagdish Ram Thakur, aged about 40 years, son of Shri Ram La! Thakur, R/o Bendrapali, Po Keregaon, Tah, Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra - Bendrapali Distt. Dhamtari (CG) 6. Gautam Singh Chouhan, aged about 34 years, son of Shri Rjkhi Ram Chouhan, R/o Bendrapali P'O Keregaon, Tah. Nagri Distt. Dhamtari Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra - Barkonha, Amapara, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) ^'^ 7. Sunaram Mandavi, aged about 37 years, son of Shri Ramgulal Mandavi, R/o Gondianala PO Gattasili, Tah. Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra - Bedhwapathra, Distf. Dhamtari (CG) 8. Vishnu Kumar Dhruv, aged about 35 years, son of Shri Banshilal Dhruv, R/o Kumhrakor, PO Gattasili, Tah. Nagri Distt. Dhamtari Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra — Kumhakor Distt. Dhamtari (CG) 9. Mithlesh Kumar Dhruv, aged 42 years, son of Shri Geeta Ram Dhruv, R/o Gattasilii, Tah. Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra - Gattasilli, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) 10. Fatteram Dhruv, aged about 39 years, son of Shri Chamra Ram Dhruv, R/o Govindpur, PO Gattasilli, Tah Nagri Distt. Dhamtari Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra - Govindpur, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) 11. Suratiyaram Markam, aged about 42 years, son of Shri Budhram Markam, R/o Khairbharri, PO Karaiha, Tah. Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra - Khairbhari, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) 12. Tiharu Ram Netam, aged about 39 years, son of Shri Jansingh Netam, R/o Hitali, PO Chanagaon, Tah. Nagri, Distt Dhamtari Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra - Kumarpara (Hitali) Distt. Dhamtari (CG) 13. Shiv Prasad Mandavi, aged about 40 years son of Shri Gannu Ram Mandavi, R/o Gondlanala PO Gattasili, Tah. Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra - Bitlingpara - Godlanala, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) i-^^;^ ''%, |f]r"^'"^ '^ ^ "^y/ :^^'w""-"' \,\^ Respondents 14. Veer Singh Yadav, aged 40 years,son of Shri Jhurru Ram Yadav, R/o Chinwari, Po Karaiha, Tah Nagri Distt. Dhamtari Shaskiya' Aypcharik Kendra - Chinwari, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) 15. Shriram Netam, aged about 39 years, son of Shri Jaggu Ram Netam, R/o. Banspani PO Ghotgaon, Tah. Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra - Baspali Distt. Dhamtari (CG) 16. Panchu Ram Markam, aged about 38 years, son of Shri Ram Sai Markam, R/o Navin Themali, Tah. Nagri Distt. Dhamtari Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra - Navin Themali, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Social Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. State of Madhya Pradesh through the Secretary, Department of School Education, Vailabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP) 3. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Deptt. of School Education, Dau l^lyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 4. Union of india, through the Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi 5. Director, Department . of Panchayat and Social Welfare, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG) ^ ,.'';3%. •:"i:%- "^ ^ %;.-^^"^ 1 iiw"'^ %...'t"; 4 ^N % Writ Petition Under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate Genera for respondents No. 1 to 3 and 5. Smt. Fouzia Mirza, Assistant Solicitor General for respondent No. 4 Oral Order (Passed on 20th~November, 2010) Per Sisni! Kumar Sinha. J:- (1) Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners even in two rounds, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution. (2) Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge