IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.118 of 2008 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director (Primary Education), Bihar, Patna 4. District Superintendent of Education, Buxar, District- Buxar. Versus 1.CHANDRA BHUSHAN TIWARY son of late Raghunath Tiwary, resident of village- Tiwaripur, P.S.- Buxar, District- Buxar. 2.Ranjit Singh, son of Late Ram Pujan Singh, resident of Dalsagar, P.S. & District- Buxar. 3.Gulab Singh, son of late Lal Bihari Singh, resident of village Purana Bhojpur, P.S.- Dumraon, District- Buxar. 4.Ramashish Ram, son of Shiv Shankar Ram, resident of village- Dalsagar, P.S. & District- Buxar. 5.Musafir Singh son of Shivnath Singh, resident of village Purana Bhojpur, P.S.- Dumraon, District- Buxar. ----------- 7 06.01.2010 This application is for review of the order dated 27.07.2007 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 9955 of 2001, whereby the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Bihar, Patna was directed to consider the reply of the show cause filed by the petitioner, as contained in annexure-6 to the writ application, in response to the show cause notice as contained in Annexure-3 to the writ application. Mr. Prabhakar Tekriwal, learned Government Advocate No.1 appearing for the State submits that till date no final order has been passed pursuant to the order on account of the pendency of this review application filed by the State. 2 Mr. Devendra Kumar Sinha, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the opposite party nos. 1 to 4 and Mr. Vishwanath Choudhary, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 5 submit that in the facts and circumstances of the case no review of the order dated 27.07.2007 is called for since the only direction of the Court was to consider the reply submitted by the writ petitioner in response to the show cause notice (Annexure-3 to the writ application) and pass the final order. Considering the submissions of the parties, I find that no order on merit in issue with regard to cancellation of appointment of the writ petitioners has been passed. By the order sought to be reviewed the only direction was to consider the reply submitted by the writ petitioners in response to the show cause notice issued by the respondent State. In this view of the matter, I do not find any merit in this review application in absence of any apparent error on the face of record or for any sufficient reasons the same is, accordingly, rejected. Since by order dated 27.07.2007 it was directed that the final order be passed preferably within a period of four months, however on account of the pendency of this matter, as submitted by the counsel 3 for the State, no order has been passed, let the order be passed preferably within a period of four weeks from today. Until final order is passed, as observed earlier in the order under review, the operation of the order as contained in Annexures- 7 & 8 shall remain suspended. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)