1 lpa186.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.186 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5729 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1665 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and the Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: Smt. Nishita Mhatre, & Shri M. T. Joshi, JJ. Date : 1st August, 2011 Shri V.B. Patil, Advocate for the Appellant. Shri S.V.Kurundkar , Addl.G.P. for Respondent No.1. ------------- 1. The appellant herein is the defendant before the trial court. He had filed a writ petition challenging the order passed by the district court granting temporary injunction to the plaintiffs. According to the appellant, he has been in continuous possession of the suit property for the 2 lpa186.11 several years and, therefore, the injunction granted in favour of the plaintiffs, should be vacated. 2. We have perused the impugned order dated 9.3.2011. In paragraph 6 of the order, the learned Single Judge has observed that the appellate court has found that consistently, the revenue records were in favour of the plaintiffs and their predecessors. The appellate court has also noted that the mutation entry in the year 1990 records that the suit land vested in the wife of Sanjee Lalchand Vanjari, i.e. Jamnabai, after his death. The plaintiffs have claimed to have inherited that property after her death. The petitioner had not substantiated his contention that he was the adopted son. 3. Apart from this, the learned Single Judge has noted that the trial has commenced and the plaintiffs are to be cross examined by the defendant. The learned Single Judge has also directed the trial court to complete the trial by 31st December 2011. 3 lpa186.11 4. In the circumstances, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned order. 5. Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. Civil Application also stands dismissed. (M.T. JOSHI, J.) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) pnd/lpa186.11