IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1467 of 2011 Tejpal Singh S/O Hardev Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and two others. … Respondents. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Brief Holder, learned counsel for the respondents. Date July 19, 2011. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Interim Relief Application No.7219 of 2011) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner, in the course of arguments, has confined his prayer only to the extent that a direction may be given to the respondent no.2-Mela Adhikari, Kumbh Mela 2010 Haridwar, to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 25-4-2011 expeditiously within a time frame as the same is still pending for disposal. The representation dated 25-4- 2011 appears to have been made for cancellation of the tender and for refund of the money deposited by the petitioner. Prayer is innocuous. Accordingly, the respondent no.2 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner-Tej Pal Singh, dated 25-4-2011 (Annexure No. 15 to the writ petition) expeditiously, by a speaking order, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. All pending applications stand disposed of. (B.S.Verma, J.) RCP