IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1996 of 2009 THIRD EYE COMMUNICATIONS PVT.LTD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS With MJC No.1997 of 2009 THIRD EYE COMMUNICATIONS PVT.LTD. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 04. 14.10.2009 These two contempt applications arise out of two writ proceedings which were instituted by the petitioner before this Court in relation to their effort to beautify Patna by erecting light post of advertisement which apart from saving money of the Corporation and offering public convenience gave revenue to the Corporation. Interim orders were passed which are said to have been violated. By virtue of interim order the work of beautification of Patna and convenience is being impaired. Petitioner who has spent considerable amount has got involved in litigations. There are serious issues involved in these writ petitions. The rights of parties have to be decided. In my view, it would only be proper for the parties to move appropriate Bench where these matters are listed for an early disposal of the case in the peculiar facts of the case. That in my view would resolve all dispute inter-parte and would let the work proceeded in a lawful and legal manner to the benefit of public. Liberty is given - 2 - to the learned Advocate General and the counsel for the petitioner to move and trial persuade the Bench in seisin of the matter accordingly. This disposes of these two contempt applications. Shageer (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J)