IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16153 of 2011 Md. Aslam Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 24.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state assisted by Sri Prem Nath, learned counsel for the informant. Although the marriage of the petitioner with informant had taken place on 25.03.2009 and there is allegation of torture as well as illegal demand against the petitioner but submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that being husband of the informant, the petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 14.03.2011 and he is ready to keep the informant with him with full honour and dignity but it is the informant who does not want to lead her conjugal life with the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the informant submitted that being husband of the informant, the petitioner is more responsible for the alleged occurrence than other co-accused persons. In course of hearing, he fairly conceded this fact that the informant had refused to lead her conjugal life with the petitioner on account of the above-said torture. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the 2 petitioner, namely, Md. Aslam be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 18 of 2011 to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)