IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19119 of 2010 MADAN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 27.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is named accused in this case carries allegation of getting his own brother disappeared and also confessed the guilt before public at large including the informant. From the order of the court below, it appears that police has already submitted charge-sheet in this case against the petitioner though investigation has been kept pending against others and there are several witnesses supporting the prosecution version. He is in custody since 19.09.2008. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, for the present, I am not inclined to allow the prayer for bail. Hence, it is rejected. Simultaneously, the court below is directed to proceed expeditiously with the trial and if it is not concluded within three year of detention of the petitioner, he shall be at liberty to renew his prayer before the trial court itself. V.K. Pandey (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)