IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 27TH MAY 2010 / 6TH JYAISHTA 1932 WP(C).NO. 16095 OF 2010(O) ---------------------------------------- AGAINST E.P.. NO.298 OF 2008 IN OS.420/1982 OF MUNSIFF COURT, PARAVUR .................... PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- PARVATHY PRABHA, D/O. BALAKRISHNA PILLAI, PAZHANGATTU HOUSE, EAST KADUNGALLOOR KARA, KADUNGALLOOR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY SRI.G.HARIKRISHNAN (TRIPUNITHURA) SRI.MAHESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. PARTHASARATHI PILLAI, S/O. NARAYANA PILLAI, PAZHANGATTU VEETTIL, KADUNGALLOOR KARA, KADUNGALLOOR VILLAGE, NOW RESIDING AT CHERUMAKKATTU VEEDU, PANAVALLY KARA, CHERTHALA VILLAGE. 2. SUMADEVI, W/O. LATE SURESH, -DO- -DO- 3. SURYA, D/O. LATE SURESH, -DO- -DO- 4. SOORAJ, S/O. LATE SURESH, -DO- -DO- 5. MANGALATHAMMALU, D/O. LAKSHMI DEVI, VADAKKEKALAPPURAIKKAL, KADUNGALLOOR KARA, KADUNGALLOOR VILLAGE. 6. PRASANNAKUMARI, D/O. LAKSHMI DEVI, -DO- -DO- 7. SREENIVASAN PILLAI, S/O. LAKSHMI DEVI, -DO- -DO- 8. ARUMUGHAN PILLAI, -DO- -DO- 9. SARALA DEVI, -DO- -DO- 10. VALSALA, W/O. LATE UNNIKRISHNAN PILLAI, -DO- -DO- 11. PRAVEENA, D/O. LATE UNNIKRISHNA PILLAI, -DO- -DO- 12. ABHILASH @ PRAMOD, S/O. LATE UNNIKRISHNA PILLAI, -DO- -DO- 13. VIJAYAM, W/O. LATE SURENDRANATHAN PILLAI, -DO- -DO-, NOW RESIDING AT MARADU, ERNAKULAM. 14. SUVEESH, S/O. LATE SURENDRANATHAN PILLAI, -DO- -DO- 15. VIJEESH, -DO- -DO- (MINOR), REP. BY MOTHER VIJAYAN. 16. KAILAS KUMAR, S/O. LAKSHMI DEVI, -DO- -DO- 17. SAMARANATHAN PILLAI, -DO- -DO- 18. SANTHOSH KUMAR, -DO- -DO- THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J. ==================================== W.P(C) No.16095 of 2010 ==================================== Dated this the 27th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T Judgment debtor in E.P. No.298 of 2008 in O.S. No.420 of 1982 of the court of learned Munsiff, North Paravur filed Ext.P2, application for re-delivery complaining excessive delivery pursuant to the final decree in a suit for partition. Along with that, petitioner filed Ext.P3, application for injunction to restrain respondents from alienating the property sought to be re-delivered or committing waste therein, etc. Grievance of petitioner is that notwithstanding that no objection was preferred to Ext.P3, application executing court has not passed any order on Ext.P3 and hence the petitioner apprehends that respondents might alienate the property sought to be re-delivered or commit waste therein. Request is to direct the executing court to dispose of Ext.P3 expeditiously. 2. Having regard to the circumstances stated I direct the executing court to consider Ext.P3, application as expeditiously as possible and pass orders as provided under law taking into account W.P(C) No.16095 of 2010 -: 2 :- the facts and circumstances of the case. Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. vsv