1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2442/2010 Dadasaheb Khandu Nik ­alje & one Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Satyajit Joshi for applicants Mr.A.S.Gadkari,APP for State CORAM:MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J. (VACATION COURT) DATE :12th May,2010. P.C. . This application is preferred by the applicants/accused for anticipatory bail. The offence is registered under sections 307, 323, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149, 427, 341,r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and they are falsely involved in this crime. It is submitted that the complainant and persons from his group who were accused in the complaint filed by the group of the applicants were released on bail. There are counter cases of sudden attack. He has submitted that no specific role is 2 attributed to the applicants. 2] The learned A.P.P.opposes this application and submits that the applicants were carrying lathis and iron rods and it was an attack with common intention and threat to the law and order in the locality . 3] The offence has taken place on 12/4/2010. It appears that the complainants and accused are from the same locality. The complainants were arrested and they got bail. The learned Sessions Judge has rightly held in his order that the applicants were not available to the police since the commission of the offence and the custodial interrogation of the applicants is necessary. Hence the anticipatory bail application is rejected. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)