IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD FEBRUARY 2010 / 14TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 3447 of 2010(E) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. K.P.SADASIVAN, KALAYATHOLIL HOUSE, KALLUPALAM DESOM, UDUMPUNCHOLA P.O., UDUMPUNCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 2. PADMINI SADASIVAN, W/O. K.P.SADASIVAN, KALAYATHOLIL HOUSE, KALLUPALAM DESOM, UDUMPUNCHOLA.P.O., UDUMPUNCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.TOM JOSE RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. NEDUMKANDOM CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD., NO. K.368, NEDUNKANDAM, IDUKKKI DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY NEDUMKANDAM CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.NO.K.368, NEDUNKANDAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 3. SENIOR INSPECTOR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ARBITRATION CUM SPECIAL SALES OFFICER, KERALA STATE CO-OPETATIVE HOUSING FEDERATION, KALOOR, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-17. 4. KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING FEDERATION (HOUSEFED), KALOOR, KOCHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.3447 of 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of February, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner claims to be a farmer who had taken a loan from the first respondent Co-operative Society. However, he has defaulted repayment of the loan. According to the petitioner, the repayment could not be made because of the failure of his crops. The Government have introduced various schemes to help such farmers in distress. The petitioner claims that he is entitled to the benefit of the one time settlement scheme as well as other schemes introduced for the purpose. He is also ready to pay off the amounts due to the bank, if his case is considered sympathetically. The petitioner has filed Ext.P6 representation before the second respondent setting out his grievances and seeking the benefits of the schemes introduced for helping farmers like himself. The petitioner complains that no orders have been passed on Ext.P6 till date. In the above circumstances, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider Ext.P6 representation of the petitioner in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE css/