^-..^- .^ jl-11 li;! II;. 1 36 HI©MCGURTOFCiiiHATnS©AKH^TBIi-ASPUft MV^SIONBENCH CORAM: HON'BLESH!U^6DISH BHAl^, y^. ^ HON'BLESH^^At£SHK,A^HOTRI.J. WritApp€saS No. 303 ofl 2007 Appellant Smt. NGlir|ii Sori^^^^^^^^ W^ Sonaram Sori/ <^ed^ ^ years, j bistrict Programm6 Officer, Wbmeri & Ch ild ^eifare Department/ Dantewada; Dlstrict &ant€;wcda^X) Versus Respondeiits 1. 1 State of Gh^tsttisga^ ^e Secret^ Womeh ^ ChiSd VS/e!far© De|artment, Maitrsia)^ ^a^y^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ 2. The t)jrect6r, Women ^ / Chiid WeiNre Departrnent, &lrectordte, Raipur(C.6.)j 3. Smt. Proft^ll Gubey, &istrict Programme j Gfficer, |VI/omen & Child W^ifare Ctepartment, &QntewadG(C.&) WritiApDeal uncler Section 2(1) of theC,^ Div!SionBenchyAct2^06i Present; Shri Prafull Bharat, counsel foM^ Shri©.D.Wasw<3rii,^oyemmentAdVoco^ 'r'""°*"''"* ORALJUD^MENT j O^assed on 07th &ecember-, 2©07) ^ ; • : 'T ! !' :. The foEiowing oral judgment of thjs Court^^^^^^^^w^ Hon'bJeJagdish Bhalla, Ag. C.J. | | Theapp^licGitipndated 06-12-2007 foram^ Let the correctton be carried out during the course of the day- The Qppellcyrt/p^^ .^''^::'/;:^'1^'.^';:^/'..1^ ..:^,^,.:,..'':.^.lll;::jl; :^^ administratjve grounds, Aggrieved^^^^^^^^^^ BK ^ /^ nimms ''17 -2-- Writ Petition (S) N6-6955/2Q07. After hearing^^^^^^te^^ the parties the petition wasjdi^ there ^ any viotation of law nor any case of strong w^3^^ Leamed counsel for the dppellant submsts that the G^peilcoit has been transferred only fqr the reGSon i.e. to adjust respondent No.3. In this respect, the apjpeilant has drawn our attention to the fact that the appeilant was <o|lready working on the post pf District Programme Officer, howeverl respondent No.3 was working on 1+ie jower post at the relevant time and she wasjpromotedtothepostof &istrict Programme Officer, whereas oniy one af Distnct ProgrQmme Officer ccn be posted. Ther^fore, to adjust S^espondent No.3 th@ cippellant hasbeen trci^sferred wd respondent^^^N as District Programme Officer*. The releyant record has been placedbe^ that the Gippeltwit has been transferrecl on the ddministrGtive ground Qnd not to adjust respohdent do not find any reasonable ground^^^^^^^ speaksng order passed By the tearnecl Singte Judge. Therefore, the writappeaJisdismissed. Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge [J