IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 34 of 2002 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 09/08/2001 in WP NO : 190 OF 1996 on the file of the High Court.) Between: A.P.Kallu Geetha Karmika Sangham (Regd.No.1754), rep.by its General Secretary Gattu Ramachandra Rao M.B.Bhavan, RTC X Roads Hyderabad ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The A.P.Rashtra Adivasi Girijana Samakhya Rep.by its Convenor Ch.Lingaiah, Ex.MLA 2 The Govt. of A.P., Rep.by its Prl.Secretary Social Welfare Dept., A.P.Secretariat, Hyderabad 3 The Govt. of A.P., Rep.by its Prl.Secretary Revenue Department, A.P.Secretariat, Hyderabad 4 The Commissioner of Excise, A.P., Hyderabad 5 The Superintendent of Prohibition & Excise, Khammam, Khammam District 6 The Collector (Excise) Khammam, Khammam District .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.A.SUDERSHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.V.R.AVULA The Court made the following : HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO :34 of 2002 JUDGMENT: ( Per the Honourable Smt.Justice T.Meenakumari) When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel for the appellant that nothing survives for adjudication in this appeal and thereby, the cause in this appeal has become infructuous. Recording the above submission, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. _______________________ Justice T.Meenakumari ____________________________ Justice Ramesh Ranganathan Dated: 23.7.2008 Nn/gurc. HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO :34 of 2002 (JUDGMENT of the Division Bench delivered by the Honourable Smt.Justice T.Meenakumari) 23rd JULY, 2008