IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1462 OF 2007 Dr.Ramesh H. Shah ..... ...... ......Petitioner V/s M/s.V.P.Finance Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. .....Respondents. Mr.S.V.Marwadi, Adv. For the petitioner. Mr.Suresh Dubey, Adv. For the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr.S.P.Kadam, Adv. For respondent No.3. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 22/1/08 PC: The present petitioner filed a complaint against respondent Nos. 1 and 2. The trial Court concluded that it is not a fit case to direct investigation under section 156(3) of Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court was also of the view that it would be appropriate to examine the complainant and witnesses under section 200 of Code of Criminal Procedure in order to find out as to whether there is substance in the complaint. Aggrieved by the said order petitioner filed revision before the Sessions Court and on rejection of revision present writ petition has been filed. The respondent No.3-Samasta Nagar Cooperative Bank filed FIR bearing No.86 on 1.9.2000 against the present respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 6 for the offences mentioned therein. The police thereafter filed charge sheet in the above matter. Said charge sheet has 1 resulted in CC No.19/PW/04 and the same is pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 19th Court against the respondents. In view of the pendency of the said case the petitioner restricts his prayer in present writ petition and makes limited prayer that his private complaint be tagged along with case bearing No.6/Misc./07 and tried along with CC No.19/PW/04. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection for adopting the said course of tagging the private complaint for its decision simultaneously along with CC No.19/PW/04. In the result the private complaint bearing No.6/Misc./07 be tagged and tried along with CC No.19/PW/04 in accordance with law. Writ petition thus stands disposed of. Needless to mention that the petitioner shall be at liberty to produce relevant documents before the trial Court. 22.1.08 2