y-l<^2^ IN THE HI6H COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISSARH Wm'Petition ition No. of 2006 PETETEONER: ho\fl..4- ^s ^^.^^•^s^- 9^;^t-At?i'a'"'>>:^i;"' —!f'.V"- - e**' at' ^..-•-' ^80-" RESPONbENTS: ^ ^yte^ ^'JasraJ Sharma, S/o Late Ratanlal Sharma, A9®clabout 46 years, Occupation: Service, Presently posted as Multi- purposs Health Worker (Male) at Primary Health Centre, Suregaon, Block: Dondi Lohara, District: Ourg, R/o Dondi Lohara. Distt.: Ourg, Chhattisgarh. - Versus - 1. State of Chhattis9arh, Through 1+ie Secretcu^, &epartment of Public Health cmd Family Welfare, Mantralcya, &.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director, Public Health and Family Welfare, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. - 3. Collector, Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4. Chief Medical & Health Officer Ourg, District: burg, Chhattisgarh. WRTT PETTTION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CQNSTrrunoN OF IN&IA POR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRrr/WRrrs. GIRECTIONS FTC.. IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTtORARI AN&/OR ANV OTHER SUrTABLE WRFT OF LIKE NATURE ^^. ^^ i^si »3 • B ea » "!tKi£? • B aas8g ~~'s2~~~~^ '^^^ ^•:'^_.''L.^ XI-HC-22 3ST':4PTRra', ESTflti'16, R|(V11U^< Sll^l 4flch VWfl Sh*ll«h ••••••••••••••••••••• ^ 200 ^s 3fi^rq;r i^iNTsn^T s»i1 Hf?(T Roshas^ 29.8A006 Mr. V.C. Ottahwar, Adv. forthe p^tftioner. Mr. Vinay Pandey, Panel Lawyel Heard. <hl<<t<l41-l tflK<'lT?''te^<,Rl<-<LI<, ^srf^tTsn^T [• for the State on advance copy, By this petition the petitioner, wljio is working as Multipurpose Heatth Worker in the Department of Public Health & Family Welfare, has chaltenged hls transfer order dated 7.7.2006 (Annexure P-8) ^ Loliara to Saja. The main ground of challenge] hereby he has been transferred from Dondi is that the p^itioner has been transferred within a short span of two years, whicjh is against the transfer poticy of the State Governmert framed for the year 20(^6-07. Another ground is that petitioner's children are studying at Doni Lohara ^nd if the impugned order is allowed to be executed, ttian thestudies of petitioner'^ children wifl be affected, In the circumstances, learned (tounsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner may be allowed to make ade|tailed represerrtation to respondent No.2 and in tum, respondent No.2 be directed to whieh fearned Panel Lawyer for the Sta; [Jeeide the representation of the petttioner, to te has no objeotion. Having heard leamed counsel f|3r the parties and having regard to the teots and circumstances of the case, withoul case, the petitioner is allowed to ma|<e a detailed represerrtation raisirg atl his grievances to respondent No.2 within with law after considering alt the points Wlth the direction aforesaid, the Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.%0|l/06 also stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. t expressing any c^iinion on the merit of the 10 days from today along with copy of this petition and In tum, respondent No.2 t() decfefe ttie representation of the petitioner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of representation in accordance taised by the petitioner. petition stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (^^fe^) RiB :'t^;l:^£• •