IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARm WP. (S; No. 7/ 7 g (2009 PETITIONER /: Om Prakash Ogale, S/o. Late Malhar Rae Ogale aged about 49 years Mata Rukmani Kanya Ashram Mokhpal Dlstt Dantewada(C G) VERSUS RESPONDENTS / ( lj State of Chhattisgarh, Thmug Secretary, Scheduied Caste Scheduled Tmbe and Backward Class Welfare Department Mantralay D K S Bhawan Ralpur (C G } (2) The Director, Directorate of C.G. Public Education Department, Raipur (C.G.} The District Education Officer, Office of District Education Officer, Distt. Dantewada (C.G.} The Commissioner, Tribal Development, Raipur (C.G.) Mata Rukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti thr, Its Secretary Mata, Rukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti Dimrapal Tahs1l 85 Distt Jagdalpur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA , h HXGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRH‘ PETITION (S) No. 7179 0f2009 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONST} I UT ION OF INDIA. SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Pressm: Shri P.S.Koshy, Advocate for the petitioner. I, \ Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the Staie/ respondents 1 to 4. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 98a; day of December, 2009) With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Smt. ALaIZ V. State of Chhattz’sgarh & Others], thus the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to decide his ease in the light of aforestated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No. 5-Institute is a Government Aided school and the petitioner is a teacher within the sanctioned strength. . Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents 1 to 4 submits that in the .event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. In View of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. unit 1 2007 (1) BLJ 265 Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. . I ’ Sdl— ‘ satish K. Agrarian ‘1 ' . ”Judge, PETITIONER : Om Prakash Ogale. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others.