1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 1946 of NO. 1946 of NO. 1946 of 1985 M/s Vinod Trading Com. Plaintiff versus M/s Bhandari Roadways .. Defendant Mr.S.G.Surana for Plaintiff Mr S.G.Shetty for Defendant CORAM CORAM CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J : D.G. KARNIK, J : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED DATED DATED : 12th August, 2005. : 12th August, 2005. : 12th August, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The defendants has not filed the written statement for nearly 20 years. The suit is for recovery of money. In the absence of the written statement the averments made in the plaint are deemed to be admitted. 2. The suit of the plaintiff is decreed under Order 8 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure in 2 terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) with modification that interest shall be payable at 9% p.a. from the date of the suit till payment. D.G.KARNIK, J