IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7753 of 2011 MD. TIPU KHAN @ TIPU KHAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 23.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 19/08 registered under Sections 302, 307,504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna. The accusation against the petitioner is to have caused firearm injury on the chest of the deceased Reyazul Khan. It is submitted by the learned Sr. counsel for the petitioner that since, the brother-in-law of the petitioner Pappu Khan was killed at the hands of the deceased, hence on suspicion, this petitioner has been named. Though, the eye-witnesses during the investigation and the co-accused persons have confessed in para 62, 95, 101, 109 and 137 of the case 2 diary that it was the co-accused persons who killed but the occurrence took place at the behest of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the other accused persons have been granted regular bail in the matter, in view of this Court, the contradiction in statements of the informant and the eye-witnesses can be a good ground for consideration of regular bail. With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed off. Let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)