1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.948 OF 2011 Bapu More & anr. .Applicants V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.Ashwin Thool i/b. Mr.Mukesh Pandey, Advocate, for the Applicants Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 12TH DECEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. Since the learned APP states that the injured persons have absolutely not entered into compromise or settlement with the applicants and the investigating officer has recorded their statements which he has made available for my perusal which show that the victims have grievance about the complicity of the 2 applicants. It was wrong on the part of the applicants to submit before this Court that a settlement was entered into between them and the first informant. There is no question of grant of anticipatory bail in these circumstances. Interim order dated 28th November, 2011 stands vacated. Criminal Application stands rejected. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)