1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1677 OF 2009 Vasudev s/o Kashiram Chavan .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. R.M. Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Girist Rane, Advocate for respondent no. 2. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 5 th November, 2009 PER COURT : 1 Complaint made by the petitioner to the industrial court seeking direction to employ his son on compassionate ground has been turned down in view of order passed on 3-10-2008. Petitioner claims that he was in employment of Municipal Council, Amalner as driver and on his retirement on reaching the age of super annuation, his son was entitled to be accommodated on the post held by the petitioner. Petitioner also seeks employment on certain other grounds. After considering the rival contentions, industrial court rejected the complaint. 2 2 I have heard arguments advanced by petitioner. There is no policy brought to my notice under which the petitioner can claim entitlement of his son to the post after retirement of the petitioner on reaching the age of super annuation. However, there is express provision laid down in the Government circular dt. 1-8-2006, in paragraph no. 48 of the circular, it has been noted that in view of directions issued by the High Court in Writ Petition no. 668/2000, no employment can be provided on compassionate ground to the legal heirs of such of those employees who retire from service on reaching the age of super annuation. In this view of the matter, the case put up by the petitioner cannot be considered. Learned Judge of the industrial court was justified in turning down the complaint presented by the petitioner. There is no warrant to cause any interference in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction conferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition therefore stands rejected. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp1677.09.odt