KS IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT MCC N0. ^ 3Lj /2010 Petitioner Pradeep Majumdar aged about 48 years, S/o KK Majumdar, R/o Near Niharika Talkies. Lolita Complex Kosabadi, Korba y*v Respondent^jc>' 1. Smt. Duvas Bai, aged about 23 years, ,;:W/o Late Anuj Das ^'•"'1^/ G'J^-/ ^'^ /••• •\' ••^•~ ^&' -(^^/ ^^ 2. .^ 3. 4. Ku. Sajni aged about 16 years, D/o Late Anuj Das Ku. Rajni aged about 13 years, D/o Late Anuj Das. Rohit Das aged about 7 years, S/o Late Anuj Das. Respondent no. 2 to 4 being minor, through mother Smt. Duvas Bai aged about 23 year, W/o Late Anuj Das R/o Village Thrakpur, Madvarani, Police Chowki Urga Tahsil Kartala, Distt. Korba 5. Commissioner Nagar Palika Nigam, Korba APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No. 694/2010 SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice R.L. Jhanwar APPUCANT RESPONDENTS Pradeep Majunidar aged about 48 years, S/o K.K. Majumdar, R/o Near Niharika TaUdes Lolita Coinplex Kosabadi, Korba Versus 1 Sxut. Duvas Bai, aged about 23 years, w/o Late Anuj Das 2 Ku. Sajiu aged about 16 years, D/o late Auuj Das 3 Ku. Rajni aged about 13 years, D/o Late Anuj Das 4 Rohit Das aged about 7 years, S/o Late Anuj Das Respondent No. 2 to 4 being aunor, fhrough inofher Sint. Duvas Bai aged about 23 years, W/o Late Anuj Das R/o viUage Thrakpur, Madvarard, Police Ctiowld Urga Tahsil Kartala, District Korba 5 Coiniiussioner Nagar Palika Nigani, Korba Appearance; Shri Yogesh Chaadra, counsel for the appllcaat. QRM-ORDER (06.12.2010) 1. The applicant has filed fhis M.C.C. for restoration ofMisc. Appeal (C) No. 1645/2008, which was dismissed on 19.11.2010 forwantofprosecution. ;^3Sb. s-^^ ^ss^ '""a S A- '%ta£.»- 4. Learued counsel for the applicant subniits fhat on 19.11.2010, when fhis inatter came up for hearing, he was busy before some ofher Bench, fherefore, he could not appear on behatf of the appUcaat, for which, he apologizes. He Iias also filed aii aEBdavit in support of his contention. On due consideration of the submission and fhe reason stated ia the application, I am of the opinion. fhat fhe applicaat has shown sufficient cause for icstoring M.A.(C) No. 1645/2008. Accordiagly, M.C.C. No.694/2010 is aUowed aad Misc. Appeal (MAC No. 1645/2008) is restored to its origmal nuuiber. , Sdf- R.L. Jhanwar Judge