HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR W.P. No. 18508 of 2011 DATED: 20.07.2011 Between: D.V. Paripurnam .. Petitioner And The Govt. of Andhra Pradesh and seven others .. Respondents O R D E R:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) The petitioner asserts that even though he was selected for appointment in the Education Department, yet he was deputed to Women Development and Child Welfare Department and posted as Warden Grade – I, Government Hostel, Kakinada on 28.02.2004 and continued as such for the last seven years. While so, it is stated that the petitioner made representation dated 15.06.2009 for his absorption in the Department of Women Development, Child Welfare and Disabled Welfare. It is also stated that at the time of his selection, the 6th respondent-District Educational Officer issued No Objection to respondent Nos.1 to 3 for continuance of the petitioner as Warden in the Department of Welfare of Disabled and Senior Citizens, and the 3rd respondent – Assistant Director, Disabled Welfare Department also recommended his case to the 2nd respondent-Commissioner, for his absorption, but his representation has not been considered so far. After completion of seven years of service, the 2nd respondent-Commissioner issued proceedings dated 09.06.2011 to the petitioner repatriating him to Education Department i.e. Parent Department. Assailing the proceedings, the petitioner filed O.A.No. 4989 of 2011, and the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, dismissed the application. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking to quash the impugned order dated 29.06.2011 of the Tribunal and also the order dated 09.06.2011 of the 2nd respondent as being arbitrary and illegal. The learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the Education Department has not given him posting orders after he was relieved from the Department of Welfare of Disabled and Senior Citizens, East Godavari District, Kakinada, nor is he allowed to join in the Department of Welfare of Disabled and Senior Citizens, East Godavari, Kakinada. Admittedly, the 2nd respondent-Commissioner issued proceedings dated 09.06.2011 repatriating the petitioner to his parent department i.e. Education Department. Since the competent authority has passed orders repatriating the petitioner to his parent department, we do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the Tribunal. Since it is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the repatriation of the petitioner to his parent department, he was not given posting orders nor he was allowed to work in the Department of Welfare of Disabled and Senior Citizens, suffice it to observe that the petitioner shall make a representation to the 6th respondent - District Educational Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari, to allow him to join duty in Education Department i.e. his parent department and also in terms of the orders dated 09.06.2011 passed by the 2nd respondent – Commissioner, and on such representation being filed by the petitioner, the 6th respondent shall consider the same and give posting to the petitioner in the Education Department. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J 20.07.2011 _______________ K.G. SHANKAR, J bcj