IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12227 of 2009 DILIP KUMAR ROY @ DILIP MUNSHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 11.9.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is in custody since 21.7.2008 in relation to Purnea Sadar P. S. Case No. 19 of 2006 which was instituted under sections 302, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is though he is named in the FIR but no overt act has been alleged against him. It is also stated that some other co-accused has been enlarged on bail by this Court by various orders, some them has been brought on record as annexures- 3,4 and 5. The case of the petitioner being similar in nature he deserves to be enlarged on bail. In view of the above submission, let the petitioner, namely, Dilip Kumar Roy @ Dilip Munshi be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate Purnea in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 19 of 2006. One of the sureties will be executed by the father of the petitioner and other by a close relative on due identification by the court below. It is further recorded that the petitioner will not intimidate the witness and cooperate in the trial by appearing on each and every date either by himself or though his advocate. He - 2 - shall not abscond. In breach of any of the conditions will disentitle him from the privilege of bail granted to him. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)