2% ‘_HIGH COURT OF JUD!CATURE CHHATTISGARH ' BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, C.J. WRIT PETITION NO. 1461 OF 2006 Present: Shri B.K. Rawat, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh, learned G.A. for respondents 1 to 3. Shri Ajay Shrivastava, learned counsel for the Caveator/ respondent No.4 (ORAL ORDER) - (Passed on 319‘ March, 2006) An appeal lies against the impugned order under Section 89-A of MotorVehicIe Act ,1988. Having heard learned counsel for the parties. i do not find any extraordinary situation or circumstance which could persuade the Court to permit the petitioner to bypass the statutory remedy and rush to this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of lndia. ln that view of the matter, l dismiss the writ petition, keeping open all the contentions raised in this writ petition to be agitated before the Appellate Authority. No costs. Sdl— Chief Justice l PETITIONER Yakub Sarif S/o. Late Ebrahim Sarif Aged about 63 years, R/o. Kelabadi, Distt. Durg. (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENT 1. sate Transpott Appeliate Tribunal, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Regional Transport Authority Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Secretary Regional Transport Authority, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Shri Raju Singh Rajpurohit, S/o. Shri K.S. Rajpurohit, R/o. Mahoba ,Bazal, Raipur (C.G.).