IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2011 / 29TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 18955 of 2011(T) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- A.NAISAM, S/O.ABDUL KHARIM, PUTHEN VEEDU, PERUKULAM, CHILAKKOOR, VARKALA. BY ADVS. SRI.S.M.PREM, SMT.K.P.SANTHI, SRI.P.K.NIJOY. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR (ACCOMMODATION CONTROLLER) CHIRAYINKEEZHU – 695 304. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VARKALA – 695 141. 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VARKALA – 695 141. 5. SAFIYULLA, AL-AMAL VEEDU, ODAYAM, VARKALA – 695 141. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH, R4 BY SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.18955/2011-T: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DTD.01/05/2010 EXECUTED BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE R.5. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 12/04/2011 IN I.A. NO. 871/2011 IN O.S. NO. 147/2011 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, VARKALA. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE REPORT DTD. 05/07/2011 SUBMITTED TO THE R.2. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD. 05/07/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE R.2. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 18955 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is the tenant of a premises owned by the 5th respondent. It appears that there are some disputes between the petitioner and the landlord. While so complaining of loss of amenities petitioner made an application to the 2nd respondent. That application is pending. In the meanwhile, it appears that the 4th respondent has disconnected power supply to the premises. It is in these circumstances this writ petition has been filed with the prayer to direct the 2nd respondent to take action against the 5th respondent for having removed the electric meter from the petitioner's premises. 2. In my view, having regard to the nature of the controversy that is pending, it is desirable that the whole dispute shall be given a quietus. In that view of the matter W.P.(C) No. 18955 OF 2011 :2 : I dispose of the writ petition with a direction that on production of this judgment the 2nd respondent shall finalize the proceedings initiated by the petitioner complaining loss of amenities and this shall be done by the 2nd respondent with notice to the 5th respondent and as expeditiously as possible at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that it is purely for the 2nd respondent to deal with the matter in accordance with law. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge