Crl. Misc. No. M-30244 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-30244 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 12, 2010 Gurmail Singh ........Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ........Respondents ****** CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. G.S. Kaura, Advocate, for the petitioner. SABINA, J. Petitioner has filed this application for cancellation of regular bail granted to the respondent No.2 in FIR No.218, dated 1.7.2010, under Sections 148,149,323,324,307,506 of Indian Penal Code (in short 'IPC'), registered at Police Station Farakpur, District Yamuna Nagar. Heard. Admittedly, initially FIR was registered under Sections 148,149,323,324,506 IPC and respondent No.2 was released on bail. Thereafter, offence under Section 307 IPC was added. Vide order dated 31.7.2010 learned Sessions Judge allowed anticipatory bail to the respondent No.2. After addition of offence under Section 307 IPC, the petitioner moved an application seeking cancellation of bail and the learned Sessions Judge while dismissing the application in para 4 of the order dated 10.9.2010 has observed as under :- Crl. Misc. No. M-30244 of 2010 (O&M) 2 “4. After hearing the arguments of both the sides and going through the case file, it is clear that the allegation o complainant Gurmail Singh regarding giving of threat by respondents No.1 to 4 to him after their release on bail on 31.7.2010 are without any basis. It appears that this application has been moved by him just to get the bail granted to respondents No.1 to 4 cancelled with some ulterior motive. The criteria of cancellation of bail is altogether different that those of the granting thereof. When no case is made out of cancellation of bail, then this application cannot be accepted.” The reasons given by the learned Sessions Judge while dismissing the application for cancellation of bail are sound reasons and call for no interference. Dismissed. (SABINA) October 12, 2010 JUDGE Anand