WP(C) 6237/1999 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Mr. R. Barua, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition was filed to challenge the order dated 29.11.1999 (Annexure-7), whereby the regulari sation of service of the writ petitioner ordered through the Notification dated 26.11.98 as a Lecturer (Hindi), DIET, Kokrajhar was cancelled. The learned couns el points that the basis for cancellation was the High Court’s order dated 27.1. 99 in Civil Rule No. 6695/98 filed by one Netaji Prasad Roy. This order of the l earned Single Judge’s was challenged before the Division Bench in Writ Appeal No . 449/99. The Division Bench by its order dated 9.8.04 set aside the judgment an d order dated 27.1.99 in Civil Rule No. 6695/98 and the matter was remanded back to the learned Single Judge for a de-novo hearing. Mr. Barua submits that after the Division Bench set aside he earlier order in Ci vil Rule No. 6695/98, the writ petitioner therein Netaji Prasad Roy did not come to join at DIET and accordingly the petitioner is continuing as a regularized L ecturer in DIET, without being effected by the impugned order dated 29.11.99 (An nexure-7). Accordingly, Mr. Barua submits that he has no reason to pursue this matter any f urther. In view of the above submission, this case is ordered to be closed as not presse d. A copy of the order dated 9.8.04 in Writ Appeal No. 449/99 (Pradip Kumar Gaoyari vs. Netaji Prasad Roy) shall be kept in the case record.