IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 22ND SEPTEMBER 2008 / 31ST BHADRA 1930 RP.No. 1013 of 2008 --------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.27138/2008 Dated 05/09/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/ PETITIONERS: ------------------------------------------------------- 1. DR.P.S.GEORGE DOCTORS TOWER, CHANGANCHERY, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SIBICHAN KURIAN, KALLUPURAKKAL ANANDASRAMAM, VAZHAPPALLY EAST, CHANGANASSERY. 2. DR.LEELAMMA GEORGE, DOCTORS TOWER, CHANGANCHERY, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SIBICHAN KURIAN, KALLUPURAKKAL ANANDASRAMAM, VAZHAPPALLY EAST, CHANGANASSERY. BY ADV. SRI.JIJO PAUL SMT.DEEPTHI S.MENON RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------------------------- 1. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL MAJOR SECTION, CHANGANACHERY. 2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL MAJOR SECTION, CHANGANACHERY. 3. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER/APPELLATE AUTHORIY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATTAM, TRIVANDRUM. BY SHRI P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, KSEB. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- R.P.NO.1013 OF 2008 IN W.P.C. NO. 27138 OF 2008 E -------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd September, 2008 ORDER After having gone through the Review Petition and having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and also the learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Electricity Board, I do not think that the petitioners have made out a ground for entertaining the Review Petition. The total demand was nearly Rs.84,021/= even after adjusting the payment made by the petitioners. This Court directed payment of Rs.30,000/= as a condition for grant of stay. Learned counsel for the petitioners would point out that in the appellate order, a larger liability has been imposed than the original order. This is a matter to be considered in the Writ Petition. At any rate, I do not think that this matter is to be considered in the Review Petition as such. The Review Petition is liable to be dismissed and accordingly I do so. RP 1013/08 IN WPC.27138/08 E 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners points out that as the petitioners could not comply with the condition of payment of Rs.30,000/=, the power supply was disconnected on 20.9.2008. He prays that time may be granted for payment of the amount. I feel that if the petitioners pay the sum of Rs.30,000/= (Rupees Thirty Thousand) and also re-connection fee, the electric connection can be restored. Accordingly, it is ordered that if the petitioner pays the amount of Rs.30,000/= (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with re-connection charges, the electric connection will be restored to the petitioners forthwith. Sd/= K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk. //True Copy// PS to Judge