IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9038 of 2011 SURAJ PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 04.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Renewing the prayer for bail it is submitted that the F.I.R. is against unknown. The petitioner is in custody since 10.6.2009 and charges were yet to be framed till 25.4.2011. Counsel for the State points out that in an allegation of train dacoity the petitioner has been identified by witnesses during T.I.P. The impugned order from Paragraph-83 of the case diary also notices the antecedent of the petitioner. Considering the slow progress of the trial, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 30,000/- (thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Railway Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Gaya Rail P.S. Case No. 42 of 2009. Both the sureties must be his mother and father respectively whose photographs and proof of residence shall be appended to the bail bonds. The 2 Court below through the local police shall have the bail bonds verified before final acceptance. The petitioner is directed to remain physically present on each date in the trial which appears to have separated except on an individual date when the trial Court in its discretion may grant him exemption. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)