1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7301/2007 (Satvindra Singh Vs. Mahrishi Dayanand Saraswati University) Date of order : 6.11.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. Rajesh Grawal, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Kothari, for the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking admission in the B.Ed. Course for the Sessions 2007-08 on the ground that no information was received by the petitioner with regard to fourth counselling although there are two modes provided under the Rules for sending information to the candidates. By way of filing reply, it is pointed out by learned counsel for the respondent that information was published in the newspaper that the counselling will be held for different roll numbers on different dates and petitioner was to appear for counselling on 26.9.2007. When information was published by the respondent University in the newspaper, then, it 2 cannot be said that no information was given by the University to the candidates for appearing in the counselling. In my opinion, petitioner himself failed to appear in the counselling, then, it cannot be said that any illegality has been committed by the University for calling the candidates for appearing in the counselling. Further at this belated stage, no admission can be granted for the sessions 2007-08 after expiry of one year. No case for interference is made out. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun