Criminal Revision No. 386 of 2002 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. Criminal Revision No. 386 of 2002 Date of Decision: 28.01.2008. Bela Devi …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr.Mani Ram Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the State. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) In the present case, admittedly as per Mr. Verma, no appeal against acquittal of respondents No. 2 to 8 was filed. Mr. Verma has contended that so far the allegations of causing injuries are concerned, there was no medicolegal evidence and learned trial Court has also not recorded conviction for the alleged beating. Learned First Appellate Court, while acquitting respondents No.2 to 8, has observed that to make out offence under Sections 354 and 452 IPC, petitioner suffered a supplementary statement, which was recorded after 12 days of the occurrence. Reasoning of acquittal Criminal Revision No. 386 of 2002 2 recorded by the First Appellate Court cannot be said to be perverse. Thus, I find no infirmity in the judgment rendered by learned First Appellate Court. Revisional Court will be hesitant to disturb the well reasoned findings of the Court, which has acquitted respondents No.2 to 8 after 14 years of occurrence. Hence, there is no merit in the present revision petition and the same is dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge January 28, 2008 “DK”