1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9772/2008 (Angoori Devi vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of order :: 11.12.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.Kuldeep Mathur, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to pay the entire outstanding but for the said purpose some time may be granted. In this case, after depositing a sum of Rs.4 lakhs, petitioner filed an application on 13th October, 2008 before the S.D.O. for granting six months' time for depositing the remaining outstanding amount. As per petitioner, one month time was granted by S.D.O., whereas the prayer was made by petitioner for granting six months' time to deposit the entire amount. The time granted by the S.D.O. expired on 13th November, 2008. Now this writ petition has been filed in the month of December, 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner again 2 prayed that some time may be granted for depositing the entire amount and till then property in question may not be auctioned if not already auctioned. In my opinion, if petitioner is ready to deposit the entire dues, then in the interest of justice, I deem it just and proper to grant two months' time to the petitioner to deposit entire outstanding. Accordingly, two months' time is granted to the petitioner to deposit the entire remaining outstanding amount. It is also made clear that petitioner shall deposit Rs.3,00,000/- within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order as first installment. Upon depositing said amount, the property in question shall not be auctioned till two months. In this case, the facts narrated in the writ petition require some more indulgence with regard to the fact that the Bank has granted agricultural loan to the petitioner for the purpose of dairy, pump-set at village Meetasar, Tehsil Sardarsahar, District Churu as well as for Kishan Credit Card. When loan was sanctioned for the said purpose, then it was to be utilized for the said purpose. But as per petitioner's case, she is not residing in the village Meetasar for last many years and she is residing at Delhi. Meaning thereby, the loan which is sanctioned to the petitioner was obviously not utilized for the purpose for which it was sanctioned without any verification by the Bank 3 authorities. In these circumstances, the Bank Authorities are directed to hold an inquiry how the loan was granted for the purpose of dairy, pump-set as well as for Kishan Credit Card to the person who is residing at Delhi. After holding the enquiry, disciplinary action may be taken against erring officer. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. A.K. Chouhan/- A.K. Chouhan/-