IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 27035 of 1999 Between: Chikatla Sudershana Rao S/o Venkaiaha R/o Ganti Pedapudi, Gannavaram (M), E.G.District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Kakinanda,E.G.District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer,Gannavaram(M), E.G.District. 3 Bandaru Satyanarayana Rao M.L.A.Kothapet,E.G.District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the notiﬁcation in Reg.No.G3/113/99,dated 25-2-99,published in the East Godavari District,Gazettee,dated 28-2-1999 as unconstitutional illegal and malafide and set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner:MRS.MARIE DESAI Counsel for the Respondents.: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO.27035 OF 1999 ORDER: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 13.8.2008, the writ petition was directed to be posted “for dismissal”. Today though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither is the counsel for the petitioner present nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _________________ 15th October, 2008 Nn.