Crl. Misc. No. M-30501 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Date of Decision: December 6, 2011 1. Crl. Misc. No. M-30501 of 2011 Sanjana Vashist …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana …..Respondent 2. Crl. Misc. No. M-32065 of 2011 Dr.Manju Batra …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. T.S. Sangha, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Narinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner In Crl. Misc. No. M-30501 of 2011. Mr.Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner in Crl. Misc. No. M-32065 of 2011. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana. Crl. Misc. No. M-30501 of 2011 [2] -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) This order will dispose of two petitions bearing Crl. Misc. No. M-30501 and M-32065 of 2011 for grant of pre-arrest bail. Petitioner Sanjana Vashist allegedly got her ultrasound test conducted from Dr.Dev Batra. The report of ultra sound reflects that uterus of petitioner Sanjana Vashist was ruptured and there was a dead fetus lying on the left side of the pelvis. The dead fetus was aborted. Irrespective of the other allegations it is sufficient to observe that the only alternative after the report of ultrasound was to abort the dead fetus. So far as petitioner Dr.Manju Batra is concerned, she is alleged to have referred the patient to IRCC Centre, Sector 17. It was at the recommendation of Dr.Manju Batra that the ultrasound was conducted. Counsel for petitioner Sanjana Vashist has not levelled any allegations of wrong termination of pregnancy but she has been involved in the case despite the fact that her version is that on account of she having fallen, miscarriage has caused. It will be debatable during trial whether it is a case of accidental miscarriage or a case of illegal abortion and termination of fetus. As per the instructions of SI Narinder Kumar, State counsel informs that the petitioners have already joined investigation. It does not appear to be a case of custodial interrogation. Crl. Misc. No. M-30501 of 2011 [3] Petitions are allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioners they will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the conditions that they will join investigation as and when required by the police and that they will not tamper with the evidence or hamper the investigation in any manner. December 6, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE