IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.928 of 2005 RAGHUNANDAN PRASAD YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 8 31.03.2010 Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and Mr. L.P.K. Rajgrihar, learned counsel for the Accountant General are present. The only claim which remained pending for payment was the pension and gratuity of the petitioner, which had not yet been paid in absence of the necessary authorization by the Accountant General. Mr. L.P.K. Rajgrihar, learned counsel appearing for the Accountant General submits that he has received instructions from his client that the pension and gratuity of the petitioner has been authorized on 23.3.2010 and thus there would be no impediment in disbursement of the regular pension and gratuity of the petitioner. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned authority of the State Government to ensure the payment of the pension and gratuity of the petitioner in the light of the authorization dated 23.3.2010. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J. ) 2