IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2010 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 37563 of 2010(U) -------------------------- SM.8/2002 of TALUK LAND BOARD, OTTAPALAM .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------------- 1. DR.O.V.VASUDEVAN, S/O.O.V.VASUDEVAN NAMBOODIRIPPAD, 37/;3053, CHALAPPURAM POST KOZHIKKODE, PIN - 673002. 2. O.V.NARAYANAN,S/O. O.V.VASUDEVAN - NAMBOODIRIPPAD, B05, LAKSHMI APARTMETS, CHALAPPURAM POST, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673002. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH SRI.V.C.MADHAVANKUTTY RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKD, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKD -1. 2. TALUK LAND BOARD, OTTAPALAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OTTAPALAM P.O. - 679101. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, OTTAPALAM TALUK, OTTAPALAM P.O 679101. 4. VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLINEZHI VILLAGE, VELLINEZHI VILLAGE, VELLINEZHI P.O. 679504, OTTAPALAM TALUK. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.K.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 37563 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 17th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Ext.P1 is an application made by the petitioners under Section 85 (8) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, which is stated to be pending before the 2nd respondent. 2. In the meantime, petitioners apprehend that the land mentioned therein will be taken over from them. It is with this grievance, the writ petition is filed. 3. Taking note of the case of the petitioners with regard to the pendency of Ext.P1, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider the same with notice to the parties concerned and pass an order thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. 4. It is directed that status quo as on date shall be maintained in the meanwhile. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before respondents 2 and 3 for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp