HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.4306 of 1991 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.07.2011 **** Krishan Lal Sawhney . . . Petitioner VS. State of Haryana & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. DR Satija, Advocate for the petitioner(s) Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, DAG Haryana **** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) (1). This order shall dispose of CWP Nos.4306, 4307 & 4309 of 1991 as issues involved are common. (2). The petitioners seek a mandamus to direct the respondents to grant them Special Pay/emoluments for the purpose of Pension and Commutation of Pension on the same pattern as has been granted in CWP No.5950 of 1989. (3). Though it is difficult to understand the nature and genesis of this litigation, however, on perusal of the writ petition, it appears that the petitioners want the benefit of Special Pay and emoluments to be taken into consideration for the purpose of Pension and Commutation of Pension. There is no document/order on record to suggest as to whether any CWP No.4306 of 1991.doc - 2 – Special Pay was ever granted to the petitioners and if so in what circumstances? (4). The respondents have also not filed the reply/affidavit explaining their viewpoint in respect of the claim put forth by the petitioners. (5). In these circumstances, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to submit a self-explanatory and comprehensive representation(s) to the competent authority who shall then consider the same in accordance with law/Rules and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (6). With this direction, these writ petitions stand disposed of. (7). Dasti . 08.07.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge