IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 25TH OCTOBER 2011 / 3RD KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28307 of 2011(K) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. MIDHUN K.P., S/O.MOHANDAS, AGED 22 YEARS, 'SWAPNA', AMBALAPARAMBU, KOLAKKATTUCHALI P.O., CHELEMBRA VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. AKHIL P.JAYAKRISHNAN, S/O.JAYAKRISHNAN, AGED 22 YEARS, THATTARIYIL THAZHAM, KONGANNUR, ATHOLI, CALICUT, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. MUHAMMED ASHIB, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.ALI V.K., VATTAKKANDY HOUSE, UNNIKKULAM P.O., POONOOR, KOZHIKODE. 4. RIDWAN, S/O.ABDUL KABEER, AGED 22 YEARS, AL KABEERS HOUSE, KOLAKKAD P.O., ATHOLY, KOZHIKODE BY ADV. SRI.M.P.MOHAMMED ASLAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENJHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.PIN-679 652 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, 'PAREEKSHA BHAVAN', UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.PIN-679 652 R1 & R2 BY ADV.SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW,SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.28307/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P-1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE FIRST PETITIONER DATED 03-10-2011 EXT.P-2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 03-10-2011 EXT.P-3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER DATED 04-10-2011 EXT.P-4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER DATED 03-10-2011 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 28307 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 6th Semester examination was declared, they had failed in some papers. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-