IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27765 of 2009 RISHI @ MANJIT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 24.08.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Section 392 of the Penal Code. As per prosecution case, the informant, during evening time was crossing through the road and as soon as reached near the Rajdhani Gas godown, it is alleged that three accused persons encircled him. They relieved him at gun point his belongings which include mobile and cash. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has not been put on T.I.P. The only material against the petitioner is that one of the co-accuseds, namely, Naushad Alam made disclosure statement, in which he has named the petitioner. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State, opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner is facing prosecution of similar nature in as many as 03 cases. It appears that petitioner is in custody since 25.03.2009. Having regard to the facts appearing from the record, this court, for the present, is not inclined to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected. The petitioner is, however, granted liberty to renew prayer for bail after 04 months from the date of 2 receipt/communication of a copy of this order in the court below if the trial, in the meanwhile, does not commence. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)