THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA SECOND APPEAL No.399 of 2010 ORDER: This second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the learned II Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, dated 19.02.2010, in A.S.No.80 of 2008, dismissing the appeal preferred by the appellant herein against the judgment and decree of the learned II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, dated 29.01.2009, in O.S.No.1821 of 2003, whereunder the suit filed by the respondent herein, seeking eviction of the appellant-defendant from the suit schedule shop and recovery of its possession, was decreed and the defendant was directed to vacate the suit premises and deliver its vacant possession to the plaintiff within three months from the date of decree and it was also directed that the plaintiff shall return the caution deposit amount of Rs.65,000/- to the defendant. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the orders of the Courts below and other material made available on record. On perusal of orders of both the Courts below, it is clear that both the Courts have concurrently found that the plaintiff, respondent herein, is the landlord of the suit premises and the defendant, appellant herein, is the tenant, that the tenancy in favour of the appellant expired by 01.11.2000, that the statutory quit notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property issued by the plaintiff to the defendant is valid and the service thereof is also valid, and thus both the Courts below have concurrently held that the plaintiff-respondent is entitled for suit claim and accordingly directed the defendant to vacate the premises and deliver its vacant possession to the plaintiff, while directing the plaintiff to return the caution deposit amount of Rs.65,000/- to the defendant. The conclusion s arrived by the Courts below being based on proper appreciation of evidence, no interference is called for by this Court with the judgments under appeal, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and more particularly when there is no question of law, much less substantial question of law involved in the second appeal. The second appeal is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed without costs. However, taking into consideration the request made by the learned counsel for the appellant, two months’ time from today is granted to the appellant-defendant to vacate the suit premises. __________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 30th April, 2010 IBL