IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO. 409 OF 2004. APPEAL NO. 409 OF 2004. APPEAL NO. 409 OF 2004. Dnyanu Jijaba Mulik & ors. ... Appellants. Versus. Krishna Shankar Jangam. ... Respondent. Shri R.V.More for the Appellants. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 21st July, 2006. : 21st July, 2006. : 21st July, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate appearing for the Appellants. The Appellants are the original Defendants. The suit for injunction filed by the original Plaintiff has been decreed by the trial Court and the said decree has been confirmed in appeal. The plea of the Appellants was that they have perfected their title by adverse possession. The findings of the Courts below are based on appreciation of evidence on record. No substantial question of law arises. The Second Appeal is dismissed. Judge. Judge. Judge.