S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.4520/2006 Date : 17.11.2006 HON'BLE MR. SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. J.S. Choudhary for the applicant. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor for State. Mr. Gaurav Singh for complainant. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the complainant and carefully gone through the impugned order. After hearing learned counsel for the parties while taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I do not feel inclined to extend benefit of bail to the applicant. Accordingly, the bail application moved by the applicant under Section 439 Cr.P.C. stands rejected. However, the learned trial court shall record in preference statements of material witnesses in this case. After recording of statements of the material witnesses if any bail application is moved before the learned trial court by the applicant, then, the learned trial court shall decide the same in accordance with law. The learned trial court may also expedite trial. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J.