1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 561 OF 2007 IN L.P.A. NO. 163 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1968 OF 2004 (Rucha Construction vs. Regional Labour Commissioner and others) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 15, 2008 Heard Shri Khan, learned Counsel for the review petitioner. The review petition is directed against the order dated 7.2.2007 passed by this Court in the letters patent appeal whereby said appeal came to be dismissed and the order dated 19.1.2006 passed by the learned Single Judge was confirmed. It is not in dispute that the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition mainly on the ground of delay and laches as well as on the ground that though opportunity was given to the review petitioner to explain 2 the claim, it failed to do so. In the backdrop of the above undisputed facts, it is apparent that this Court dismissed the letters patent appeal mainly because conclusion arrived at by the learned Single Judge that the writ petition suffered from delay and laches was found to be just and proper. No other facts and circumstances, which existed at the time of hearing of the writ petition but could not be placed by the review petitioner before the learned Single Judge, are placed before us and in the absence thereof, in our view, no case is made out for showing indulgence. The review petition is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE khj