IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC(T) No. 353 of 2008 Decided on: 22.10.2010 Nathu Ram …Petitioner. Versus Prabodh Saxena …Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. K.C. Sankhyan, Advocate vice Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : As per the contents of the reply, order dated 24.01.2007 passed by erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal stands implemented. Consequently, the present petition is rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed as infructuous. 2. However, the liberty is reserved to the petitioner to assail Annexure- R-2 in accordance with law and the limitation will not come in his way. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 22, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?