IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No.^^ Singfe 0en^ /2011 APPLICANT -.1' •^ppeUant ^" Lal S./o Badku Satnami, aged about 49 years, Agriculturist, R/o village Bundeli, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.), Since died l.--i .??>'"\^y'' through Legal representative Mohan Lal ...y"'"''1^1^"^--'' "- ...-•""G.'i'ft-£'?~j1^..-^"x S/o Late Babulal, aged about 62 years, >"^eAwl'J' ...<-?^V' ' -, .„ !„ -^ -. ..„ ,^VK"~ ...^•••'^">;J\" ' R/o village Bundeli, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.), ^ .^•••"' •sy^f^ v NON-APPLICANTS Respondents VERSUS /t. Atmaram S/o Adhar, aged about 34 years, Agriculturist, R/o vUlage Gidhwa, Tahsil Bemetara (Nawagarh), District Durg (C.G.). ^,. State of M.P. (Now C.G.) through Collector, Durg (C.G.). APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF SECOND APPEALNO, 382/1994 ft' 311^1 ^I R;"< Wff ^t^T »*llct> Y *11*«11 tt>*11<*> 'S^f -<iWW^, WXI\WW, h'fwy, ..K.£.c.:..^....&ig^/ 3n^r'tRq;' ('yi^^ti) (<<IIW ^lft3 311^1 q)i<iI<n*Tli Mffl<nf^f fST^ <,f<it$i< ^raiRra aii^i S.JB: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ^I.K. AGARWAL" 05.12.2011: Shri Dashrath Prajapati, Shri G.D. Vaswani, G.A.I Heardonl.A.No.3/20111 of delay in filing the restoration| On due consideration, pounsei for the petitioner. for theState/respondent No.2. ,which is an appiication for condonation application. 1 am;satisfied that the petitioner is application and, therefore, the succeeded in exptaining the (jsause of delay in filing the restoration appiication {I.A. No.3/2011} is allowed. Deiay in fiiing the restoration aj)plication is condoned. Aiso heard on restoratioi|i application. The petitioner is see|<ing restoration of Second Appeal No.382/1994 which was dismi^sed for wantof prosecution vide order dated 17.01.2011. | On due consideration oflthe submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the gro^nds taken in the restoration petition,! am satisfied that the abse|ice of the petitioner's counsel on 17.01.2011 when Second Aj}peal No.382/1994 was taken-up for hearing was based on bona ffa|e ground&. M.C.C. No. 840/2011, thjerefore, is allowed and Second Appeal No.382/1994 is restored to its <|>riginal number. A copy ofthis order be {tlaced on record ofthe original file and the same be listed for hearing |mmediately aftertwo weeks. Certified copy, as perrul^s. ^•^ iud^