C^L^-^ IlsLTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDIC^TL'RE <4T BILASPL/R. CHHATTISGARH WRIT PFTCrrON (S) No. "?-^2^ _/ZQIQ ^ PETTTEONERS ^' /'^^.fly' ..yagtyy •»SiaBME«: Versus RESPONDENTS 1. Kaliya, S/o Shri Mohan Lal Teji, aged ' 26 years, R/o War-d No.IO, New Baradawar, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.6.) 2. Sanjay Kumar Rohidas, S/o Shri Ramayan Prasad Rohidas, aged 26 years, R/o Ward No.l, New Baradawar, district- Janjgir- Charnpa (C.6.) 3. AAurari Lal Bareth, S/o Shri Thuluram, Aged 38 years, R/o Ward No.14. New Baradawar, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 4. Kanhiya Lal Yadav, S/o Shri Beldar, aged 28 years, R/o Ward No.2, New Baradawar, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.6.) ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Urban Administrative & Development Department, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Nagar Panchayat, New Baradawar, District- Janjgir- Champa, Through Its Chief Executive Officer. New Baradawar, District- Janj9ir- Champa (.C.G.) ^ •<t WRIT PETtTEON UNbER ARTICLE 226 OF THE GONSTITUTION OF IN&XA -l^-^PADTTCUI^A&S-aE^T-UC Dt^LLLl^OMCtu^- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WR]T_PET!T!ON_(S) N0^7728 of 2010 PETITIONERS : Kaliya & Others VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Another WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State. QRDER(ORAL) (Passed on 21st day ofApril, 2011) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties fairly submit that the issue with regard to applicability of circulars dated 23/09/2010 and 05/03/2008 was considered in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others . This Court, after hearing all the parties, considered the issue and passed the order in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others . This petition may be disposed ofaccordingly. 2. Thus, having regarding to the facts situation of the case, wherein the issue involved in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others as well as in this case are one and the same, the instant petition stands disposed of in the same terms and order passed in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others1. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Arun