IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.731 of 2010 SAKALI DEVI WIFE OF RAMPRIT MOCHI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LAKHANPUR VIGAHA, P.S. KAKO, DISTRICT- JEHANABAD Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, JEHANABAD 4. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, P.S. JEHANABAD, DISTRICT- JEHANABAD 5. UDAY PRASAD SON OF YOGESHWAR PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA SABJI MARKET ROAD, P.S. JEHANABAD, DISTRICT- JEHANABAD ----------- 2 02.02.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the respondent no.6. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is being unduly harassed/threatened by the respondent no.6, who is an accused in Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 325 of 2004 registered for various offences including offence under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code as also under section 3(XI) & (XII) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. After some argument, Mr. Satyabrat Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of the grievances, as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to take appropriate steps permissible under the law before the appropriate forum. In view of the above, the writ application stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)