... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3991 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3991 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3991 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri S.P.Kadam for the Applicants. Shri S.V.More, A.P.P for the State. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 15, 2006. DATE : NOVEMBER 15, 2006. DATE : NOVEMBER 15, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. In view of the decision of this court in the case of V.K.Jain and Ors. Vs. Pratap V. Padode & Anr. (2005(3) Maharashtra Law Journal Page 778), the learned Advocate for the Applicants seek permission to withdraw this Application with liberty to file revision Application before the appropriate Sessions Court. He prays that delay in filing revision Application may be ordered to be condoned. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. If Application for condonation of delay is filed by the Applicants before the appropriate Sessions Court, it is bound to be considered on its own merits. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE