IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 5642 of 2008 Between: Chandrakala, R/o. Bairapur (Vg), Kalpol, Nizamabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Rural Police Station, Nizamabad. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Nizamabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an Order, direction, or a Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the Respondents heren to produce the husband of the Petitioner, before this Hon'ble Court to produce the husband of the Petitioner, before this Hon'ble Court, who was illegally detained by Rural Police, Nizamabad since three days, apprehending danger tohis life and set him at liberty forthwith Counsel for the Petitioner: FAX MESSAGE Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORDER: (per Sri A. Gopal Reddy, J) This is a taken up writ petition on the basis of fax message dated 13-03-2008 sent in the name of Chandrakala to the Hon’ble the Chief Justice. On issuing notice, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Nizamabad Rural Police Station filed an affidavit along with the statement of the husband of the petitioner alleged to have been detained by Rural Police, Nizamabad. It is stated that the alleged detenu was called to the police station for the purpose of enquiry in connection with the complaint given by one Nenavat Balaram and after enquiry he was let off. The detenu as well as the petitioner were produced before the Tahsildar-cum-Mandal Executive Magistrate, Nizamabad to record their statements. The alleged detenu as well as the petitioner stated that the police never detained the alleged detenu and the petitioner has not sent any fax message to the Hon’ble the Chief Justice and it was sent on her name by some unknown person. It is also stated that the petitioner as well as the detenu have participated in National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme from 17-03-2008 to 19-03- 2008 and that they have never detained the alleged detenu illegally as alleged in the fax message. In view of the above averments, no adjudication is called for on the fax message. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. A.GOPAL REDDY, J B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J 31-03-2008 ks ... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Station House Officer, Rural Police Station, Nizamabad. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Nizamabad. 3 2 CCs to the Advocate General, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad (OUT). 4 2 CD copies