IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16418 of 2011 1. Ram Raj Ram, son of Late Shivdhari Ram, resident of Village Bhikhabandh, P.S. -Daraunda, District – Siwan. 2. Shiv Narayam Ram, son of Late Dhoop Nath Ram, resident of Village Ramgarha, P.S. Daraunda , District Siwan. 3. Baharan Prasad, sSon of Bhirgunath Prasad, resident of Village - Beldari Tola, P.S. Daraunda , District Siwan. 4. Dilip Kumar Singh, son of Late Girja Singh, resident of Village- Sawan Bigarah, P.S. Daraunda , District Siwan. . . . . . Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate, Siwan. 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Siwan. 5. The Block Development Officer, Daraunda Block, District Siwan. 5. The Officer-In-Charge, Daraunda Police Station District – Siwan. . . . . . Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2/ 18.10.2011 The petitioners, who are P.D.S. dealer, pray for quashing the Memo no.1551 III dated 03.08.2011, issued under the signature of Block Development Officer, Daraunda, Siwan, by which they have been directed to pay the value of remaining undistributed rice at APL rate of Rs.13.70 per kg. given to the under the SGRY Scheme. The petitioners submit that they have distributed the entire quantity of rice allotted to them. Counsel for the State submits that the submission of the petitioners is subject to verification. In the facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioners file a representation before the Block Development Officer, Basantpur Block, Siwan within six weeks from today, the same would be disposed of within a further period of eight weeks. Till then, no coercive steps would be taken against the 2 petitioners. I want to make it clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion regarding the claim of the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)