BailAppl 1021/08 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.1021/08 Vinod Kumar Agarwal Versus State DATE OF ORDER : 12/02/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Jai Dayal Sharma, for accused-applicant Mr. R.P. Kuldeep, Public Prosecutor *** Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the material on record. It has been contended by counsel for applicant that he was only a broker and after the mustard oil was transported and received by the drawer, the complainant received cheques also, but the same was dishonoured. The trial is pending for offence u/s.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Taking note of material on record and without expressing any opinion on merits, this court considers it appropriate to allow the anticipatory bail of accused-applicant Vinod Kumar Agarwal. Accordingly, I allow the bail application of the applicant U/s 438 Cr.P.C. and the SHO/IO of Police Station Udyog Nagar, Bharatpur is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant Vinod Kumar Agarwal S/o Shri Madan Lal in FIR No.86/07, he shall enlarge him on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together BailAppl 1021/08 [2] with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- to his satisfaction on the following conditions: (i) He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when requires; (ii) He shall not directly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police Officer; (iii) He shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA1021Bail Application2008 12-2.doc