IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22231 of 2010 ABHISHEK VERMA @ MASTU son of Randhir Verma, Resident of village-Bangali Colony Chouk Shikaiput Patnacity, P.S.-Chok, Dist.-Patna ….. ….Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ….. ……Opp.Party. ----------- 7. 3.12.2010. Heard Mr. Manish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Nityanand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No.354 of 2006 for the offences under Sections 302, 201, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Shankar Verma, who was made accused, in the present case, in the F.I.R. itself, has been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No.52754 of 2006 on 18.1.2007. It has further been submitted that at subsequent stage, the petitioner has been arrayed as accused with an alias name as Mastu, who was named as Accused No.3 in the F.I.R. Mr. Nityanand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State, has opposed the prayer for bail. Keeping in view the fact that co-accused Shankar Verma has already been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No.52754 of 2006, there is no reason to deny the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. 2 Let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Patnacity, Patna in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No.354 of 2006. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)