1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13511 of 2011 Manoj Mandal Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 4 8.8.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner along with Manju Devi is alleged for killing informant’s father. There is no eye witness in the case, circumstance is only there if appears leading involvement of the accused also in the incident. In the fateful night according to prosecution case, deceased went to the house of co-accused Manju Devi with whom she had illicit relation, this petitioner had also same relation with her and under a conspiracy allegedly was killed and his dead body was taken to Railway Track to show the case of accidental death. Witnesses are there to state that this petitioner was seen coming from the place where dead body was kept and found in the morning. They are stating about blood stain from the house of Manju Devi to Railway Track. Petitioner has criminal antecedent also. Difference in between the lawyers for the petitioner and the informant is about number of cases in which petitioner has been acquitted that is not relevant at all 2 but the circumstance stated above, does not entitle petitioner for bail even considering his custody since 28.12.2010. Hence, prayer for bail on behalf of petitioner is rejected. However, the trial is directed to be expedited. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)