1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Civil Application No.7116 of 2009 In SAST No.4338 of 2009. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|_______________________________________ 1. Mr. V.G.Raokhande, learned advocate holding for Mr.S.M.Godsay, advocate submits that because other legal representatives are already on record, it is not necessary to take steps against the Respondent No.4. The Respondent Nos.1 to 3 have been served. The Respondent No.4 is the mother of the deceased defendant. Her name shall be deleted from the array of the Respondent. Though served, the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 are absent. 2. The delay condonation application is filed on the ground that delay of seventy one (71) days occurred due to official difficulties as stated in paras 4 and 5 of the application. The explanation appears to be reasonable and sufficient. I, therefore, accept the explanation. Consequently, the C.A. is allowed and the delay is condoned. (V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) Dt.04.11.2009. asp/office/Ca7116.09