,^ C I- i£^>/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition fsTNo755" <o ^ /20Q7 PETITIONER ^&^ <? ,•••' .'$:-v ^' ^ RESPONDENTS .^-GO?<I ^c^%- ^^wl ^^ ^-w Mahendra Kumar Verma, S/o Shri H.N. Verma, aged about 44 years, Occu.- Service Assistaat Grade-III Office of the Senior Agriculture Development Officer Janakpur (Bharatpiir) District- Korea (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh - Through :- (1) Secretary, agriculture Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). (2) Joint Director, Agriculture, Bilaspur Division- Bilaspur (C.G.). (3) Deputy Director, Agriculture, Baikunthpur, District- Korea (C.G.). (4) Director Agriculture, Directorate of Agriculture, Raipur (C.G.). (5) Janaki Prasad Gautam, Assistant Grade-III, Agriculture farm, Lohari, District- Korea (C.G.). (6) Dharma Nath Singh, Assistant Grade-III, Soil Conservation Office, Manendragarh, District- Korea (C.G.). (7) Manoj Kumar Shrivastava, Assistant Grade- III, Sub-Divisional Agriculture Office, Baikunthpur, District-Korea (C.G.) (Last known address) (8) Pushpa Raj Singh Parihar,Asstt. Grade- III Soil Conservation Office,Manendragarh Distt. Korea (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIOf INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER/DIRECTION N ^ HIGH COUOT OF CHHAmSGARH : BILASPUR Writ Pfetition fSl No. 5504 of2007 Petitioner Mahendra Kumar Verma Versus Respondents -State of ChhattisgaA & ofhets (Writ Petition zmder Articfe 226 of fhe Coaistitution of Indi^ (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agniliotri J.) Shri Uttam Pandey, Advocate for fhe petitloner. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the lespondents No. 1 to 4. O RD E R lof9Q ( Passed on this 10fh day of September, 2009) Heard. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioiijer, on instructions, submits that fhe petltioncr seeks permission of this Coiirt to wlfhdTaw fhis writ petition witli Uberty to file a representation to fhe conceraed aufliority, isdsin^ hte grievance. Learued counsel appearmg for the respondents/State has no objection. In view of fhe foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above-stated Mberty. No order asto coste. Thnkur Sd/- Satish K. Agnih"m Judge