IN THE HIGH COUR T OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11197 of 2011 Dr. Ramchandra Prasad Singh, S/o Late Ram Kishun Singh, Retired Professor, Head of Post Graduate Department of Economics, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University. Presently residing at Village – Chhoti Aighu, Post Office – Bari Aighu, Police Station – Begusarai Muffassil, District – Begusarai. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development (Higher Education), Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University through its Registrar, Bhagalpur. 3. The Vice-Chancellor, Tilaka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 4. The Registrar, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 5. The Finance Officer, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University. 2 14.07.2011 Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Krishna Chandra, learned AC to Adv. General, who appears on behalf of respondent no. 1/State and Sri Anil Singh, who appears on behalf of respondent nos. 2 to 5/Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. The petitioner who retired with effect from 31.01.2009 as University Professor & Head of Post Graduate Department of Economics, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur has made a prayer for directing the respondents to revise his pension with effect from 01.01.2006, for directing the respondents to provide relief of merger of 50% dearness relief on his basic pension, payment of arrear of salary in view of implementation of University Grants Commission pay scale with effect from 1996 and also for payment of arrear of salary in view of implementation of University Grants Commission pay scale with effect from 01.01.2006 besides other claim of retrial dues. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that issue regarding revision of pension and merger of 50% dearness relief has already been settled by this court in number of cases including CWJC No. 3616 of 2010 (Dr. Himanshu Bhushan Vs T.M. Bhagalpur 2 University, Bhagalpur & Ors.) and other connected writ petitions disposed of on 03.12.2010. He has drawn my attention to typed copy of order which is Annexure – 1 to the writ petition. Learned counsel for the respondents are not disputing the fact that aforesaid issue has already been decided. Accordingly, the present writ petition so far claim of revision of pension and merger of 50% dearness relief is concerned is allowed in terms of order dated 03.12.2010 passed in CWJC No. 3616 of 2010. So far other reliefs are concerned, with the consent of parties the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before respondent no. 4/Registrar, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no. 4 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no. 4 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine he is required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal respondent no. 4 is required to pass speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within four months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction the writ petition stands disposed of. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)