:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.960 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.960 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.960 OF 2007 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L) NO.982 OF 2006 (L) NO.982 OF 2006 (L) NO.982 OF 2006 Dr.Suman V.Jain ..Appellant Vs. Marwadi Sammellan & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.Alok Gupta i/b.Mihir Desai for the Appellant. Ms.Neeta Joshi i/b.N.M.Ganguli for Respondent No.1. Ms.I.Calcuttawala, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 25TH JANUARY,2008 : 25TH JANUARY,2008 : 25TH JANUARY,2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion the Appellant is seeking condonation of 106 days delay in filing the above Appeal. Perused the Notice of Motion and Affidavit-in-support thereof. Sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay in filing the above Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)