IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL SECOND APPEAL No. 251 of 2007 JAWAN MAL V/S LRS.OF CHATTER SINGH Mr. KAILASH TRIVEDI, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 3.7.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The suit has been dismissed by both the learned Courts below on the ground that the document, on the basis of which the suit has been filed, being promissory note, is not sufficiently stamped. It has been found that it bears a stamp of 80 Paise, which is not sufficient. It is not in dispute that the promissory note does bear the stamp of 80 Paise. In that view of the matter, I do not find any error in the findings of the learned Courts below. The appeal thus, does not involve any substantial question of law. The same is, therefore, dismissed. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/