IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5539 of 2009 NATHUNI RAM Versus THE BIHAR INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVP CWJC No.13038 of 2007 NARENDRA KUMAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.12020 of 2008 SITA RAM PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.12296 of 2008 BIMAL KISHORE MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.12329 of 2008 ARVIND KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.12392 of 2008 JANESHWAR MAHTO Versus THE BIHAR INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVP CWJC No.12711 of 2008 DAROGA RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.12906 of 2008 RAMJEE PRASAD Versus THE BIHAR INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVP CWJC No.13069 of 2008 RAJENDRA RAWAT Versus THE BIHAR INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVL CWJC No.13078 of 2008 SUBHASH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS - 2 - CWJC No.13151 of 2008 ARJUN KUMAR SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.13473 of 2008 GAUTAM PATHAK Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 5.5.2009 In all these matters, either appeals are pending against the impugned orders or the appeals have been dismissed for non- prosecution. The writ applications are therefore fully covered by the order of this Court dated 16.4.2009 in CWJC No. 8382 of 2007 in which directions have been given of the manner in which the appeal has to be disposed including revival of such appeals which have been dismissed exparte because the petitioner has approached this Court and is sanguine hence did not pursue the appeal. This Court considers it proper to direct incorporation of that part of the order in CWJC No. 8427 of 2008 and other analogous cases that the fairness shown by the senior Counsel shall be reciprocated before the appellate authority also and this Court expects that the Officer of the respondent authority shall not take different and varying stand. These writ applications are disposed in the similar terms as the order dated 16.4.2009 in CWJC No. 8382 of 2007. (Navin Sinha,J.) A.Kumar - 3 -