IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 13TH JANUARY 2009 / 23RD POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 1167 of 2009(L) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.RAMAN NAIR, S/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, 70 YEARS, CHEMMANDA HOUSE, ARIMBOOR PO., THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY THRISSUR, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY 2. SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. 3. M.K.PUSHPANGADHAN, MENOTHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, KANDASSANKADAVU, THRISSUR. 4. MANZOOR, THIRUTHIKKATTIL, PO.PADIYAM, MUTTICHUR, THRISSUR. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No. 1167 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 13th day of January, 2009. JUDGMENT By Ext.P2, a stage carriage bearing registration No.KL- 8-P 3096 has been attached in O.S.No.826/06 pending before the Sub Court, Trissur. It is stated that ,despite such attachment, in order defeat the same, the 3rd respondent attempted to transfer the permit of the vehicle to the 4th respondent. It is stated that such request was allowed as per Ext.P3. However, objecting to the transfer and pointing out that the transferee vehicle is already dismantled, petitioner filed Ext.P4 before the 2nd respondent. Going by the pleadings in this writ petition, pursuant to Ext.P3, the petitioner has been heard by the 2nd respondent but however orders have not been passed. It is at this stage the writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P3. WP(c).No.1167/09 2 2. As already noticed, objecting to Ext.P3 since the petitioner has already filed Ext.P4 and as he has already been heard as is seen from Ext.P5, it is only appropriate that the 2nd respondent shall pass orders thereon. In view of this it is ordered that the 2nd respondent shall pass orders on Ext.P4 based on the hearing that has been granted to the petitioner as per Ext.P5. This the 2nd respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.1167/09 3