HIGH CGURT 6F CHHATTISGAI-(H AT BILA$PUR Eivision Bench : Hon’bie 5hri Diii Raosa'ne‘n Des'nmukh & en’ble Shri Raieshwar La! Jhanwar. . H JJ: Criminai Apgeai No. 23’1 af 19$? State of MP. through PS. Manendragarh MP) Versus Respona‘ents 1'. Ramwati Bena Ramadhar Modi (Gupta). aged 55 years. z. Yotan Kaur, Wio Suk‘ndev Sardar, aged 35 Aii Rio Yo‘nar Para, Manendragarh, PS. Manendyagarh, Bk“ gamuja (MP) icat‘ion for ieave to a eai unaier 5ection 373 Cr.P.C‘. i Crimin Agpea! undea‘ Sectien 31$ {1) GLPE. . Present :Shri Praveen Das, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the appeiiantiS‘raie. Responcients absent. \I#: I’§ J Gmi. 0R5ER (Passed on 24'“ August. 2009) This appeai by the State under Section 372?;(1‘) 9f the Cr.P.C. arises out of the judgment detect 02-12-1992 passed in Sessions Triai No.8i91‘ by the teamed Additionai $essions Judge, Manendragarh whereby the deceased-respondent—Pappu aiias Dhananjay was acquitted'of the charge under $ection 302 of the i.P.C. for committing murder of his mother-Smt. Shanti Bai and the respondent No.1-Ramwati andrespondent No.2-Yotan Kaur were acquitted of the charges under Section 114/;5UZ of the i.P.C. for abetting the commission of murder of Smt. Shanti Bai by the deceased- respondent—F‘appu aiias Dhananjay. (2) Appeai against the deceased respondent-Pappu aiias Dhananjay has abated since the deceased respondent-Pappu died in a road accident during pendency of the appeai. i 8' ai (3) Shri Praveen Das, iearned Deputy Govt. Advocate appearing on w behaif of the appeiianffState has not been abie to point out any iiiegaiity in the iudg’ment of acquittal of the respondent No.1—Ramwatt and respondent g No.2-‘Y’otan Kaur from the abovementioned charges. Learned Deputy Govt. Advocate for the appeitantr'State stated that the soie eye witness Kamte Eat, P.W.1 dict not support the prosecution story and other witnesses Sentosh Kumar, P.W.5. Ramavtar. P.W.6 and Md. Harun. PW] did not testify i \ againstthe respondents. (4) Having perused the record, we are also of the considered opinion that acquittai of the respondent Not-Ramwati and respondent No.2-Yotan Kaur by the teamed Additionat Sessions Judge is weii merited and does not oaii for any interference. (5‘) There is no merit in this criminat appeai which is accordingiy dismissed. Sd/L R.L. Jhanwar Judge Sdl~ DILIP RAOSAHEB DESHMUKH Judge