IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO. 40 OF 2004 APPEAL NO. 40 OF 2004 APPEAL NO. 40 OF 2004 Sadhana w/o Sampat Mahind & Ors..... Appellants. Versus Ananda Ganpati Mahind & Ors..... ... Respondents. Mr. Anilkumar K.Patil for the Appellants. None for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 8TH DECEMBER, 2005. : 8TH DECEMBER, 2005. : 8TH DECEMBER, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : Heard. Considering the fact that the appellate court has reduced the amount of maintenance at the rate of Rs.300/- per month from the date of the suit to Plaintiff No.1 as the trial court had granted at the rate of Rs.500/- per month, the present appeal has been preferred. There is no substantial question of law as such in this matter. 2. The appellate Court after considering the material on record reduced the maintenance charges. At this stage of the proceeding, I see there is no reason to interfere with the said finding. However, liberty is granted to apply afresh in change of circumstances for enhancement of maintenance, if necessary. The Court may consider the same after giving opportunity to the parties. 3. This second appeal is, therefore, dismissed without going further into the merits of the matter. Sd/- (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)