-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS SUMMONS SUMMONS FOR FOR FOR JUDGMENT NO.118 OF 2006 JUDGMENT NO.118 OF 2006 JUDGMENT NO.118 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.3515 OF 2005 NO.3515 OF 2005 NO.3515 OF 2005 M/s Priya Shetty’s Collection ...Plaintiffs v/s Ministry of Styles HUF ...Defendants Ms Kudalkar i/b Mr Dinkar Rao for Plaintiffs. None for Defendants. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 3RD JULY 2006. -2- P.C. :- 1. The learned counsel appearing for plaintiffs states that the defendants are served, she has filed affidavit of service. None appears for the defendants. No reply has been filed. In the absence of any application filed by the defendants for not decreeing the suit, the plaintiffs become entitled for judgment in terms of Order 37 of the C.P.C. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs. Perused the record. Summons for judgment is granted. Suit of the plaintiffs is granted in terms of prayer clause (a) of the plaint. Refund of court fees as per rules. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. ---------------