1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRI. APPLICATION NO. 4441 OF 2008 Bhaurao Indrabhanji Tidke Vs. State of Maharashtra and other ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders Mr. R.M. Patwardhan, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. D.M. Kale, A.P.P. for the non-applicant/State. CORAM:- R. Y. GANOO, J. DATED :- 18th AUGUST, 2009. As the matter was called out learned Advocate for the applicant applied for withdrawal of this petition. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn. Hence, disposed of accordingly. After the aforesaid order is passed, learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that petitioner’s presence on each and every date before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Akola in his capacity as a complainant be dispensed with as he is more than 70 years old. The request is fair. It is hereby ordered that the petitioner need not remain present on each and every date before the Chief Judicial Magistrate to attend to the complaint. Needless to mention that a lawyer will attend to the said complaint. When the learned Judge wants to record evidence of the petitioner, he shall specify the 2 date on which date the petitioner will remain present. Even otherwise as the petitioner is senior citizen, learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Akola shall hear and dispose of the complaint as expeditiously as possible. JUDGE pma.