THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.9137 OF 1997 ORAL ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the issue raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by a decision of a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.7337 of 1992 and batch, dated 29.10.1997. Accordingly, following the said decision, the writ petition is dismissed as premature. However, the petitioners are granted liberty to make representation to the Governor for redressal of their grievance, in which event the same be considered in terms of the observations made by the Division Bench in W.P.No.7337 of 1992 and batch. No costs. __________ (G. ROHINI). 26th February, 2007. Kgr THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.9137 OF 1997 26th February, 2007. Between: Velagala Satyavathi and another. .. Petitioners. And Union of India, represented by its Secretary, Law Department, New Delhi and others. .. Respondents.