HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 12th May, 2011 1st Bail Application No. 343 of 2011 Order on the bail application of the accused. Ishan S/o Late Shri Naeem Akhtar ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party In Case Crime No. 4 of 2011 U/s 395, 342, 420, 170, 412, 504, 506 I.P.C. Police Station Kotwali Manglor District Haridwar Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Subhash Tyagi Bhardwaj, the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri G.S. Sandhu, the learned G.A. for the State. The First Information Report does not name the applicant. It is upon investigation that the applicant was caught with the alleged articles which had been robbed. The co-accused Nadeem has been enlarged on bail by an order dated 15th March, 2011 in 1st Bail Application No.200 of 2011. The role of the applicant being similar is also entitled to be enlarged on bail. Consequently, considering the facts and circumstances that has been brought on record, the Court is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the basis of parity. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 4 of 2011, U/s 395, 342, 420, 170, 412, 504 and 506 I.P.C., on his depositing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 12.05.2011 Shiv