IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1439 of 2010 1. PITAMBER THAKUR S/O LATE ASHARFI THAKUR R/O MADHUBANI TOWN, MOH- GADIYANI (KASERA POKHAR), WARD NO. 3, P.S. MADHUBANI, DISTT. MADHUBANI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE MADHUBANI 3. THE ANCHAL ADHIKARI RAHIKA, DISTT. MADHUBANI 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF LIBRARY BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE CHAIRMAN null DISTRICT CENTRAL LIBRARY, MADHUBANI WARD NO. 13, P.S. MADHUBANI, DISTT. MADHUBANI ----------- 2. 29.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. From the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, the leased status of the petitioner goes beyond the pale of any controversy. But the petitioner has himself stated in Paragraph-9 of his application that Eviction Suit No. 1 of 2009 filed against him by the District Education Officer-cum-Secretary, District Central Library, Madhubani for vacating the premises was allowed on 15.9.2009. House Control Appeal No. 184 of 2009-10 preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed by the appellate authority on 3.11.2009. The respondents contend that the impugned order for vacating the premises dated 12.1.2010, has been issued consequent to the dismissal of the appeal. 2 The respondents appear to be following a procedure established by law for eviction. There is no occasion for the writ Court to interfere at this stage. The petitioner has adequate remedies available to him against the appellate order dated 3.11.2009 as acknowledged by him in Paragraph-9 of his own application. Unless and until the appellate order is not upset, varied and/or modified, there is no occasion for this Court to interfere with the impugned order dated 12.1.2010. With the aforesaid observations, the writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)