THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11667 of 2008 ORDER: In the writ petition, petitioner has questioned proceedings, dated 30.09.2007 issued in Rc.No.506/06/JA by the first respondent - Tahsildar, Golugonda Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. By the aforesaid proceedings, Ac.0.01 cent of land covered by survey No.129/1B of Ravanapalli Village is allotted for construction of a community hall, on the application of one K.Satyanarayana and others of Ravanapalli Village of Golugonda Mandal. The impugned proceedings are questioned on the ground that with regard to the same piece of land, earlier, possession certificate was given to the petitioner and she is entitled to construct a house thereon. It is the case of the petitioner that as the said site has already been allotted to her, allotment of very same piece of land for construction of community hall, on the application of the third parties, is illegal. Though the allotment was made on the application of one K.Satyanarayana and others, they are not impleaded as party respondents in the writ petition. In the counter-affidavit filed by the first respondent, while denying various allegations made by the petitioner, it is stated that the husband of the petitioner was already granted a house-site and suppressing the same, the petitioner secured another house-site of Ac.0.01 cent, as such, the possession certificate in respect of the said land was cancelled by proceedings, dated 30.09.2007. It is also stated that the site in question has already been used for construction of community hall and 75% of the work was also completed. In view of the statement mentioned in the counter-affidavit that possession certificate given to the petitioner was cancelled by proceedings, dated 30.09.2007 and in any event, as the persons, in whose favour the impugned proceedings are issued, are not even made party respondents in the Writ Petition, I do not find any merit in the writ petition for grant of relief as prayed for. The writ petition is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 18th JULY, 2011. kvni