1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4083/2011 (NARAYAN M. IKHAR VERSUS MANDABAI N. IKHAR) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.P. Hiware, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : AUGUST 23, 2011 . By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order passed by the trial Court on 08.06.2011 rejecting an application filed by the petitioner for dismissing the execution proceedings filed by the wife for recovery of the maintenance amount. It is the case of the petitioner in the application for dismissal of the Special Darkhast filed by the wife that the wife and his son were entitled to maintenance only till the son attains the age of 18 years. According to the petitioner, since the son has attained the age of 18 years, neither the wife nor the son are entitled to any amount towards the maintenance. The trial Court rightly dismissed the application filed by the petitioner by observing that though the son was not entitled to any maintenance after he attained the age of majority, the wife was still entitled to recover a sum of Rupees One Thousand per month. In such circumstances, the trial Court rightly dismissed the application filed by the petitioner-husband for dismissal of the execution proceedings. 2 Since there is no merit in the writ petition, the same is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE APTE