r '. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARiJAT BILASPUR W.P.(S)No. ^63> /200d7 PETITIONER -^ Puna Ram Sahu S/o.- Uderam Sahu , ^ Aged about- 40 years, 1"-''^'P&'"' -.••"" Assistant Teacher, Middle ivL^V.-" Snhnnl Kiimarria. Rlnpk - ^)- ^>'-"" .^?^' 'v'\^- KS^ RESPONDENTS VERSUS ^ 1. 3. School Kumarda, Block Chhuriya, Distt.- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) . State Govt. of ChhattisgarH Through: - Secretary, : School Education Deparfanent Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan | Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, 1 Rajnandgaon, Collectorate,i Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Principal, Middle School Kumarda, Block - Chhuriya, Distt.- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 sn^Tqir^riq; tI^n'3T1^?Tsh^lcti Sopal ^ +41+1^(T Sh*<T^» 3:^'.<ii<ncn<i, a-rflwis, ft<nit<y / W-f?-^ H..2^rs/&^- ^ W[ 200 3f^r ><ac») (yit^siyr) 5HITW(rfl'(T3n^T 19-14007 Mr. R.S.Patet, Mr. Ravl Malwshwari, Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, Mr. Sushll Dubey, GovernntientAdvocato Gupta, Deputy Govemmen^ Advocate for the State/respondents. Malwshwari, Mr. Rahul Jha arri courjset for the petitloner(8). andMr.Satish q>l<lF<'l<fl-l t1l*1ClTfftel3'tRl<CK ^Sif^TSTI^IfT counsst appearkig for the partles, the 1 of. Writ PeBtion (S.) No.262 of 2007 in With the consent of laametl matter is heard flnally and dispos^d Common order dictated li|i open Court, passed separately. A copy ofttiis order be pla|ced on ttie record of the connected wril petttions. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge P.T.O. r k HISH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BU-^SPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'HLE MR. ^TISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. Petitioners WRIT PETITION (S.t N0^82 OF 2007 Sundw LalPatel and anottier versus Respondents : State <rf Chhattl^arh and ottiers PeUtioner WRIT PETmON (S.) N0.263 OF 2B87 Puna Ram Sahu versus Respondents : State Govfc of CWtatttegaihandoUiers PeSBoner WRff PETITION (S.l N0.264 OF 2007 Ranr Kunar Satame vereus Resoondents : State Oovt. ofGhhatfegarti andothas WRIT PETmON (S.i NO^eSOF 28W Petitioner : Hemant KumarSalam» Versus Respondents : StateQovt.ofChhattl^arftandoUiers PetJtioner wrar PETITIQIN (s.i NO^BS opzooy Budhnath Sa! Paikra versus Reseondents : Starte of ChhErtfegarttand ottiera wrar pETmoN <s.i NO^S? OF 2007 <L PetiUoner : Madan Lal Sahu -/- versus Respondents : StateofChhaUtegaittandothere Petifoner WRIT PETITION (S.1 N0^89 OF 2«>7 PHamberPatel versus Resoondents : aatetrfChhattisgaitiandrthers Petitioner WRIT PETmON(S.)NO^yOQF 2007 Trinsrth Gtraud»ary versus Respondents : StBtetrfGhhattisgsBhanAothers r Priitioner WRITPETITION (S.t IW.281 OF 2W7 Snrt. DeepU ^irawal veraus ResDondents : StateorChliatBsgarhMidothere Present : Mr. R.S-Patd, Mr. Ravl Maheshwari, h4r. Rahul Jha and Mr. Rajendra Tripathl, counsel for the petitioner(9). Mr. Sushil Dubey, Government A^ocate and Mr. Satish Gupta, Deputy Govemment Advocate forthe State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 19th Day of January, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for »iepariias joinBy suhmit thatthe facts and quesfion <rf law involved in the prssent b^h of writ petiUons are squarely covered by the decision ofthisCourtinthe casa of Yashwant Kumar Bhsrwhwrf vs. 1unfc<M( Cnfporattofl, Dy»ar toHi anoithei'. 2. In subsequent cases, is., Writ PetiUan (S.) hto.4130of 2005 (Sopesft KumarVwma v8. The State Sovt of efcftafffagw* aml anottiw) and other connected matters, ctecided by this Court en 15-12-2006, pursuant to tha meino dated SB-1-1995, issued by the Secretaty, Board of Secondary Educafion, Bhopal andlfte prospeclus aS DiplCTna in Education Examlnatian, it was clarified that ttie nomenclatureof the Basic Training InsUtute, i.e., B.T.I. has been 1 4 changpd and renamal as Diptcwna in Educallon, l.e., Dfd. Accordingty, the D.Ed. eertificate hoktBis are atse coverect by ttr decision in Writ Petitfon (S.) lsto.4130 of 2tX®(Goipesft KumarVwma vs. The Sfefe GoW. ofChhattsgwh aocfanoftei) (Supra). 3. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitians are disposed of in terms <rf ttie declsion of this Court f»the matter <rf Yashwait KiimarBhaiwfwa^ (Supra), subject to verification of Ure firet as to whether the peBtioners have acqulred B.EdJB.T.t./D.Ed. CerBficates at Iheirown expenses as per ths ciroularsdatad 24-12- 1998 and 1-3-1999 and further vi*iether they hava been p»ld tffo adwsawe increments or not. No ordw as to costs. Oopal 4. A copy of this order be ptaced en ttie record of the connected writpetiUons. _^_———--— — Sd/- SarishK. Agnihotn Judge 1 2006(11)MPJR-GS96 1