IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7157 of 2008 SANTOSH KUMAR SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 8.5.2008 Prayer of the petitioners is for grant of bail in Pandaul P.S.Case No.212 of 2007 registered under section 328,307, 379 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal code. Mr. Ram Narain Mahto, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that according to the prosecution, petitioner gave a pera containing drug which caused unconsciousness to the victim and thereafter accused persons looted his belongings. Mr. Veena Rani Prasad, Additional Public prosecutor appears for the State. Having heard learned counsel for the party and taking into consideration the nature of allegation and material available, I am not inclined to accede to the prayer of the petitioner. However, in case the trial is not concluded within nine months, petitioner shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail before the Court below itself, which shall consider the same in accordance with law. Application stands dismissed with the aforesaid observation. (C.K.Prasad, ACJ) ahk