IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Crl. Misc. Application (C-482) No. 35 of 2011 Tara Chand Dhiman S/o Sri Patram Vice President, Jan Kalyan Evam Swachchhata Samiti, Shardanagar, Jwalapur, P.S. Kotwali Jwalapur, District Haridwar. ...…………. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary Home, Dehradun. 2. Swami Shiv Shankar Giri disciple of Swami Siddarthanand Sarswati R/o Dhanraj Giri Ashram, Karkhari, Haridwar, P.S. Kotwali Haridwar, District Haridwar. 3. Shyam Murari S/o late Chunni Lal R/o E-5, Ramnagar Colony, Jwalapur P.S. Jwalapur, District Haridwar. 4. Devendra Kumar S/o Vidyadhar R/o Ramnagar Jwalapur, Presently residing at in front of Milk Product Center Ludhiyana (Punjab). 5. Ashok Kumar S/o Hari Chand Sharma R/o 140, Tilak Nagar, Ludhiyana (Punjab). ...…………. Respondents Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present for respondent State. Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate, present for respondents No. 2 and 3. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. 2) By means of this petition, moved under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Cr.P.C.), the petitioner has sought quashing of the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 2650 of 2010; State Vs. 2 Tara Chand, relating to offence punishable under Section 182 of I.P.C., police station Jwalapur, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. 3) Brief facts of the case are that an application under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. was moved by the petitioner, on the basis of which a Crime No. 521 of 2007 was registered. After investigation, final report was submitted in the matter. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, while accepting the final report, found it to be a case of the nature in which the cognizance of offence punishable under Section 182 of I.P.C. is required to be taken against the complainant, and took the cognizance vide its order dated 29.10.2010. 4) Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties, and after going through the papers on record, this court is not inclined to interfere with the trial of the case. 5) Therefore, the petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is dismissed with the observation that if the petitioner Tara Chand Dhiman surrenders before the court concerned, and moves application for bail, his bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay. (Urgency Application No. 774 of 2011 also stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt. February 14, 2011. H. Negi 3