HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sinale Bench : Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh. J. APPELLANTS OWNERS M.A.(C) No.841/2007 1. Sandeep Tomer, Son of Late Satyaveer Singh Tomer, aged about 21 years; 2. Sumeet Tomer, Son of Late Satyaveer Singh Tomer, aged about 18years; Both are residents of C-3/146, Janakpuri, New Delhi (U.P). Registered owner of Tractor No. U.P. 12/7519. versus RESPONDENTS Hemlata, Wife of Santosh Yadav, aged about 22 years, Resklent of Village Ghodamar, Tahsil Kargikata, District Bilaspur (C.G.) (Ctaimant) Rajkumar @ Raju Dubey son of N.P. Dubey, aged about 35 years, Resident of Mankadika Ghat, Qr. No. 10/203, Police Station Chowk, Varanasi, District Banaras (U.P.) Presently residing at Kota, Polics Station and Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.) DriverofTractor No. U.P. 12/7519. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Through: Branch Manager, 9 Community Cenfre Mayapur, Phase- 1, Through: Diviaonal Manager, Orietttal Insurance Company Limited, In front of High Court Bilaspur (C.G.) (Insurer) Memo ofAppeal under Section 173 (2) ofthe MotorVehicles Act, 1988 Present : Shri Malay Kumar Bhaduri, counsel for the appellants. Shri Abhishek Sinha, Counsel with Shri Ghanshyam Patel, counsel forthe respondent No.S/insurer. '?<f ORAL ORDER (Passed on 09tn October, 2q|B7) Heard finally. |S 2. This appeal arises out of an award dated 27-^-2007 passed by the Vlllth Motor Accidents Ctaims Tribunal (F.T.C.), Bilaspur in Claim Case No. 36^006 granting compensation of Rs.30,000/- in injury case. 3. It is not disputed that the Tractor trolley in which the injured was travelling was not insured. Liability was fastened on the owners/appellants while exonerating the Insurance Company. 4. During course of arguments, learned . counsel for. the '"/Aa^ ifa- aN^-^t. ft'^u-ik^lS,^ ^-A <a^o csifdL •^^t''- appellants did notjpoint out any illegality or infirmity jn the impugned award/judgment. 5. Accordingly, the appeat being devoid of merit is dismlssed. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge Kvr