IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45021 of 2009 BINOD DOM S/O LATE MATHURA DOM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.12.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that for recovery of a Mobile phone the petitioner has remained in custody since 14.10.2008, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Tekari P.S.case No.116 of 2008, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and (ii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )