S.B.CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.359/2007 Mohan Lal Bansal Vs. Sh. T.K. Parmar & Anr. Date of Order :: 8.7.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. C.S.Kotwani, for the petitioner. Mr. Rameshwar Dave, for the respondents. ... By the order dated 10.8.2006 this Court stayed operation and effect of the order dated 5.6.2006 passed by the Dy. Secretary to the Government of Rajasthan placing the petitioner under suspension. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that though the respondents have revoked the suspension but the petitioner has been transferred at a distant place and that amounts contempt of the Court. I am of the view that this Court stayed suspension of the petitioner and not his transfer, as such, I do not find any act on the part of respondents for defying the order dated 10.8.2006. The contempt petition, therefore, is dismissed. However, it is open for the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy to challenge the order of transfer. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal