IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.12500 of 2011 Date of Decision.19.07.2011 Amrik Singh Sekhon son of Sh.Karam Singh Sekhon, resident of village Kohara, District Ludhiana .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through the Financial Commissioner & Principal Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Punjab Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. R.K .Arya, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Notice of motion. At the asking of Court, Mr. Navdeep Sukhna, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks through this writ petition a direction to the respondents that the petitioner shall be given such protection as the situation could demand if the complaint is forwarded setting out the particulars giving apprehension of danger to life and liberty to the petitioner. The 4th respondent will take appropriate action on the basis of such complaint. 3. The writ petition is disposed of with the direction as aforesaid. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall supply a copy of complete paper book of the writ petition to the counsel appearing for the respondents to effectively communicate the order to the 4th respondent. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 19, 2011 Pankaj*