1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8976 OF 2009 Yogesh Suryabhan Sonawane ... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. R.A.Lokhande, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. V.S.Masurkar, Govt. Pleader, for respondent No.1. Mr. K.Y.Mandlik, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr. Kiran Gandhi i/b. M/s. Little & C. Advocates, for respondent No.3. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 10th December, 2009. P.C. 1. On behalf of respondent No.3, the learned Counsel makes a statement that the allotment of marks based on the information conveyed by respondent No.2 to respondent No.3 as the respondent No.2 has communicated to the petitioner that he has obtained 17 marks instead of 70 marks, that was reflected in the mark sheet. As this fact has now been discovered that this was a mistake and that the petitioner has obtained 70 marks, the respondent No.3 is willing to correct the mistake. 2 2. We direct the respondent No.3 to correct the mark sheet of the petitioner by reflecting the same i.e. 70 instead of 17. Order accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)