IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.107 of 2008 Vijay Kumar, son of late Moti Singh, resident of village-Bhadseni, P.S.-Hasua, District-Nawada …. Petitioner/Appellant Versus 1. The Chairman,State Bank Of India having its office at Mumbai 2. The Deputy General Manager, State Bank of India, Zonal Office, Judges Court Road, Patna 3. The Assistant General Manager, Region III, Disciplinary Authority, S.B.I., Zonal Office, Patna … Respondents ----------- 6 30.06.2011 The present appeal has been preferred against the order dated 03.08.2007 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 1313 of 2005 wherein the appellant has chosen to question the order of discharge with superannuation benefits and disqualification for further employment passed by the disciplinary authority i.e. Bank. The appellant seems to approach this Court on earlier occasion also by filing a writ petition i.e. C.W.J.C. No. 3928 of 2001questioning the order of removal and the learned Single Judge after hearing the parties disposed of the said writ petition by remanding the matter back to the authority to reconsider the punishment. Accordingly, after reconsidering the matter the authority has passed the order of discharge with superannuation benefits. Aggrieved by the same 2 the appellant has preferred the present appeal. It has been contended on behalf of the appellant that even though he has chosen to draw the advance of L.T.C. but returned the amount with interest. However, the learned Single judge after considering the matter dismissed the writ petition. The conduct of the petitioner on earlier occasion also goes to show that he was in habit of drawing L.T.C. advances. It is the case of the respondent that he was awarded with punishment of stoppage of five stages increments. The record shows that he is in habit of drawing LTC advance and returning it subsequently. Under the above circumstances, we are of the opinion that due to conduct of the appellant he is not entitled for any benefit, moreso, the respondent Bank has also considered the entire issues and passed the order of discharge which cannot be found fault with. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed. Ashwini (T.Meena Kumari,J.) (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)