1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1437 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 379 OF 2004 (V.M. Engineering and another .v. Shankar Ukarda Sarode and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri S.G. Loney, Advocate for the appellant/applicant. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. 26TH FEBRUARY, 2008. Heard. The grievance of the appellant/applicant is that he was only petty employer and the principal employer as also immediate employer are not found responsible for compensation under Workmen's Compensation Act. Attention is also being invited to the Written Statement filed by the original non-applicant Nos.1 and 2 in said case. It is apparent that the claimants are not concerned with the dispute interse between so called employers. The application is, therefore, misconceived. The same is rejected. Liberty to the applicant/appellant to move appropriate application if the appellant/applicant is seeking any relief from the other employers. JUDGE