CR No. 2611 of 2009 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 2611 of 2009 (O&M) Decided on :02-08 2010 Subhash Chander ....Petitioner VERSUS Surjit Singh and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjeev Bawa, Advocate for the respondents MAHESH GROVER, J No one is present on behalf of the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is directed against the order dated 10.3.2009 by which the application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 was allowed. The petitioner is the defendant in the suit initiated by the present respondent. Prior thereto, petitioner filed a suit against respondent for mandatory injunction which was decreed in his favour. He thus preferred execution thereof. The respondent has assailed that decree which is in favour of the petitioner to say that it is result of fraud, which proceedings are still pending. Learned counsel for the respondent states that he has completed his entire evidence and it is for the petitioner who is defendant therein, to conclude his evidence and the suit is being delayed for one reason or the CR No. 2611 of 2009 (O&M) 2 other. After hearing learned counsel for the respondent and perusing the material on record, I am of the considered opinion that the present revision petition can be disposed of by observing that the Trial Court shall ensure that the petitioner does not take any undue adjournments and the matter is concluded as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 8 months from today. No unwarranted indulgence shall be shown to either of the parties during the course of trial. Disposed of. Till disposal of the suit, the operation of the impugned order which has already been stayed, shall subsist. August 02 , 2010 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge