1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7145 OF 2005 Balkisan Birgu Yadav .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7146 OF 2005 Bablu Rajendrasingh Thakur .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.P.R.Arjunwadkar for applicants Mr.R.Y.Mirza, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 17th November 2005. P.C. . Identical prayers are made and, therefore, both applications are being disposed of by a common order. 2 2. Applicants herein have been granted bail by the Court below in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount plus cash surety of Rs.2000/-. The only submission made by Mr.Arjunwadkar is that despite being enlarged on bail, applicants are unable to arrange for solvant surety. He, therefore, requests that the amount of surety be split and instead of one surety it be split in two sureties. He does not seek any other alteration. 3. Mr.Mirza A.P.P. leaves the matter to Court. 4. Considering the submissions made in the application and in the larger interest of justice, the order passed by the sessions judge in both applications is modified and the applicants are permitted to furnish two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/-. Rest of the order is not interfered with. Applications disposed of. 3 (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)