THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.Nos.1202 and 284 of 2008 COMMON ORDER: These two revisions are interrelated. Hence, they are disposed of through a common order. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as arrayed in C.R.P.No.284 of 2008. The petitioners filed O.S.No.32 of 2006 against the sole respondent in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Rajampet for the relief of cancellation of two sale deeds dated 27.01.2001 in relation to the suit schedule property. The respondent and ten others filed O.S.No.50 of 2001 in the same Court for the relief of partition and separate possession of the suit schedule properties. The suit schedule property in O.S.No.32 of 2006 also included therein. The petitioners are also made as party defendants in that suit. The respondent filed I.A.No.953 of 2006 in O.S.No.32 of 2006 with a prayer to club both the suits. The application was allowed on 23.01.2007. C.R.P.No.1202 of 2008 is filed against the same. The petitioners filed I.A.No.977 of 2007 seeking review of the order dated 23.01.2007 passed in I.A.No.953 of 2006. That I.A. was dismissed on 06.11.2007. The same is challenged in C.R.P.No.284 of 2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent. It is not in dispute that the property in relation to which the petitioners claimed the relief in O.S.No.32 of 2006 is an item included in the schedule to O.S.No.50 of 2001. Independent and separate adjudication of these suits is bound to result in conflicting decisions being rendered. The trial Court has taken the correct view of the matter and no interference is warranted. The civil revision petitions are accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 18.11.2009 JSU THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.Nos.1202 and 284 of 2008 Date: 18.11.2009 JSU