THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.10112 of 2009 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation appearing for the 1st respondent. The writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent-Corporation in demanding advertisement fee from the petitioner on the ground that the name boards fixed by it on parapet walls of the business places are covered by Sections 420 and 421 read with Section 622 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the issue involved in this writ petition is not res integra and a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.Nos.4172 of 2003 and batch dated 06.03.2007 has already considered the issue and disposed of the writ petitions giving liberty to the petitioners therein to make representations to the respondents within a period of two weeks and the respondents were directed to consider the representations of the petitioners and pass speaking orders on all the contentions raised by the petitioners. Following the same, this writ petition is also disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to make representation to the respondents within a period of two weeks. On such representation being filed, the respondents shall consider it and pass speaking orders on all the contentions raised by the petitioner. No costs. _____________ V.ESWARAIAH, J Date: 13.05.2009 Note: Furnish CC by tomorrow B/o. va/vs