IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2010 / 29TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 25610 of 2010(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- BABU JOSEPH, S/O. SCARIA, AGED 43 YEARS, CHEERAMVELIL HOUSE, MUTTAR.P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-689574. BY ADV. SRI.V.C.JAMES SRI.GEORGE MECHERIL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, MUTTAR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, (P.O.) MUTTAR ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-689574. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, B.S.N.L, ALAPPUZHA-688801. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, B.S.N.L, ALAPPUZHA-688801. 4. THE SUB ISPECTOR OF POLICE, RAMANKARI, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-689595. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA FOR R1 & R4 ADV. SRI.C.S.RAMANATHAN FOR R2,3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.25610 of 2010 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 20th DAY OF AUGUST, 2010 JUDGMENT The Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking for a direction commanding respondents 2 and 3 not to carry out the proposed construction work of Mobile Tower at Muttar in view of Exhibit P4 stop memo. 2. The learned Standing Counsel for the BSNL has produced before me an order passed in I.A.No.1025/10 in Appeal No.726/10 issued by the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions, staying the above order. 3. The petitioner herein is the 3rd respondent in the appeal. Therefore, it is upto the 3rd respondent (the petitioner herein) to approach the Tribunal for appropriate relief. Without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach the Tribunal itself to oppose the pleas in the appeal or in the stay petition, this Writ Petition is disposed of. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. dsn