IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37267 of 2008 RAMAKANT MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.9.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.455/2003, Tr. No.1179 of 2008, for the alleged offences registered under sections 420, 406 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that the elder brother of the petitioner had taken money from the complainant, but the same was not returned to the complainant despite repeated demands made by him. It is alleged that when the complainant approached the elder brother of this petitioner for return of the money, the petitioner was also there and he brought a country-made pistol and opened fire. However, it did not hit anybody. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the allegations are bald and as such no cognizance has been taken against the petitioner under section 27 of the Arms Act. The learned APP is not in a position to refute the submission. Considering the above, it is directed that the petitioner Ramakant Mishra, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No.455 of 2003, Tr. No.1179 of 2008 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing 2 bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri B.K. Gupta, Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)