CRM NO. M-31151 OF 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM NO. M-31151 OF 2010 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 19.01.2011 Kirpa Devi and others ...Petitioners versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. R. S. Sihota, Senior Advocate with Mr. B. R. Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Girish Agnihotri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate, for the complainant. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel has stated at the bar that the petitioners have joined the investigation. No specific injury has been attributed to any of the petitioner except Sumran. Sumran has been attributed simple injury. It is a case of cross-version. The initial version was recorded at the instance of accused party. CRM NO. M-31151 OF 2010 (O&M) -2- Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that inspite of order of Civil Court, the petitioners are not allowing construction at the spot and on that account the application of Dhan Singh has been declined. Dhan Singh has filed separate bail petition. These submissions shall be considered in that case. All the ladies have been involved. So, in these circumstances, the order dated 25.10.2010 is made absolute. Disposed of. JANUARY 19, 2011 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE