IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINTIAL Criminal With Petition No. 145 of 2009 Vipin Kumar S/o Amar Singh ……….. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …………. Respondents Mr. Parikshit Sani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pajari, G.A. for respondnet Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent Nos. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Parikshit Sani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pajari, G.A. for respondnet Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No. 3. 2. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; contents of the F.I.R.; and the papers filed by the petitioner in the writ petition, I do not fined that the petitioner is entitled to get the reliefs claimed in the writ petition. 3. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed in limine. 4. I am refraining form commenting on the merits of the case least it may adversely affect the petitioner’s case at the trial, which is yet to start. 5. However, it is made clear if the petitioner moves bail petition before the court below, his bail petition shall be disposed of expeditiously without waste of time. 6. Consequently, the CLMA No. 1871 of 2009 also stands disposed of. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 17.03.2009 Shiv