IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 4604 of 2008 Decided on: 04.10.2010 Kesar Dass …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R. P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner, though is working as Laboratory Attendant, however, he is seeking promotion to the post of Clerk. 2. It is evident from the contents of the supplementary affidavit filed by the respondent-State that the petitioner is not eligible to be considered for the post of Clerk as per Recruitment and Promotion Rules. Consequently, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall be considered for promotion in his own stream, if permissible, under the law. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 4, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?