1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD).No.14724 of 2011 Thilagavathy ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police Madurai Rural Madurai District 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Usilampatti Madurai District 3. The Inspector of Police Chekkanurani Police Station Madurai District in Crime No. 67 of 2011 ... Respondents PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the third respondent, Inspector of Police, Chekkanurani Police Station, to file a final report in Crime No. 67 of 2011. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Safar Badhusha For Respondents : Mr.P.Kannithevan Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the third respondent, Inspector of Police, Chekkanurani Police Station, to file a final report in Crime No. 67 of 2011. 2. Heard Mr.K.Safar Badhusha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Kannithevan, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner has filed a Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., before this Court and the same was ordered on 03.01.2011, directing the respondents to register an FIR. As per the order of this Court, the respondent has filed an FIR against the accused persons on 06.02.2011, in Crime No. 67 of 2011 with the third respondent for the alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 471(A) of IPC. He would further submit that after filing of an FIR, the accused persons moved an anticipatory bail before the District Sessions Court, Madurai and the same was ordered, but it was not complied by the accused. He would also submit that the petitioner has given a representation in person to the first respondent on 08.05.2011 regarding the inaction of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 the third respondent, but no action has been taken. Therefore, he would request the Court that a direction may be issued to the third respondent police to complete the investigation and to file a final report in Crime No. 67 of 2011 on the file of the third respondent. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit in his argument that on the complaint given by the petitioner, a case has been registered in Crime No. 67 of 2011 and the investigation will be expeditiously done and the final report will be filed within a period of six months before the appropriate Court. 5. Considering the submissions made by both sides, this Court is inclined to record the submissions of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) and to direct the third respondent to investigate the case in Crime No. 67 of 2011 as expeditiously as possible and to file a final report, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the abovesaid direction, this Petition is disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Records) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1. The Superintendent of Police Madurai Rural, Madurai District 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Usilampatti, Madurai District 3. The Inspector of Police Chekkanurani Police Station, Madurai District 4. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, Madurai +1cc to Mr.K.Safar Badhusha, Advocate, SR.No.39670 vsg GH : 29.11.2011 : 2p/6c Crl.O.P.(MD).No.14724 of 2011 14.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/