1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2030 OF 2008 CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and A. A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATED : 26TH SEPTEMBER, 2008. (In Chamber at 2.45 p.m.) Ms. Rohini Balasaheb Pawar, state on S. A. : My name is Rohini Balasaheb Pawar. I am 28 years old. I came from my parents house at Borivali. I am a Lecturer in Political Science. I know the petitioner. He is also a Lecturer in Political Science. For some time we were together in the College. I had relationship with the petitioner but I have now decided not to marry him. This decision is purely my own decision. I have not taken this decision of not to marry the petitioner because of any pressure. I have taken this decision out of my own free will and I have not been forced by my parents to marry with anybody else. I do not want to go with the petitioner. Sd/- 26/09/2008 (Ms. Rohini Balasaheb Pawar ) Deponent. Per Court: Read over and accepted. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.) 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2030 OF 2008 Vishal Madhukar Bansode.. ... .... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... .... Respondents. Mr. Fedrics i/by Ms. Rita Abrahan for the Petitioner. Ms. P. H. Kantharia, APP for the State. Mr. Pankaj Kawali for Intervener. Mr. Govind R. Maladkar, PSI from MHB Police Station. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and A. A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATED : 26TH SEPTEMBER, 2008. (In Chamber at 2.45 p.m.) P.C. : Pursuant to our order, the detenuu, Rohini Balasaheb Pawar has been produced. We recorded her statement. She stated that she had relationship with the petitioner but she has now decided not to marry the petitioner. She further stated that decision not to marry the petitioner is not because of any pressure. She also stated that she has taken this decision out of her free will and she has not been forced by her parents to marry with anybody else. She has further stated that she does not want to 3 go with the petitioner. 2. In view of the above, the Ms. Rohini B. Pawar is allowed to live her own life. The petitioner shall not disturb her. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.)