IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22898 of 2011 Jagnarayan Yadav & Ors Versus Bhuneshwar Rai & Ors ---------------------------------- 02. 22.12.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. This application has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 11.05.2009 passed in Misc. Appeal No.58 of 2008/1 of 2009 by Additional District Judge VIII, Chapra dismissing the appeal and affirming the order dated 07.08.2008 passed by 2nd Munsif, Chapra in Title Suit No.31 of 2006 rejecting the injunction application dated 24.03.2006. Admittedly, from the above facts, it appears that injunction application was filed in the year 2006 and during these six years, there is no injunction order. Both the Courts below have concurrently found that the plaintiff- petitioner has got no prima facie case nor the balance of convenience is in his favour. In 2010(9) SCC 385(Jai Singh vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and others), the Apex Court has held that the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the constitution of India cannot be exercised like a bull in china shop to correct all errors of judgment of a court or tribunal acting within the limits of its jurisdiction. This correctional jurisdiction can be exercised in cases where orders have been passed in grave dereliction of duty or in flagrant abuse of fundamental principles of law or justice. As 2 stated above, in the present case, both the Courts below have found concurrently against the petitioner. In supervisory jurisdiction, therefore, this Court cannot interfere and substitute its own finding regarding the prima facie case or balance of convenience in favour of the petitioner. Thus, I find no merit in this application, as such, it is dismissed. Saurabh ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)