THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA Civil Revision Petition No.4943 of 2009 Date: 23-10-2009 Between Kosuri Srinivasa Rao … Petitioner/Appellant/Respondent and Akurati Malleswara Rao … Respondent/Respondent/Petitioner THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA Civil Revision Petition No.4943 of 2009 Oral Order: Heard Sri P.Rajasekhar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner-tenant and Sri V.S.R.Anjaneyulu, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent-landlord. 2. This civil revision petition is directed against the judgment and decree, dated 20-8-2009, in R.C.C.M.A.No.6 of 2009, passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge cum Appellate Authority under A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, Vijayawada, Krishna district, wherein and whereby the order and decree, dated 23-12-2008, in R.C.C.No.2 of 2007, passed by the Rent Controller cum IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, were confirmed granting two months’ time to the tenant to vacate the petition schedule property. 3. Perused the impugned judgment passed by the lower appellate Court as well as the order passed by the trial Court. The finding of the trial Court, which was confirmed by the lower appellate Court, is that there was wilful default of payment of rent on the part of the tenant and the consequent orders of vacating the petition schedule premises was ordered. 4. From a careful consideration of the material made available on record, I am of the view that the trial Court as well as the lower appellate Court have arrived at the conclusion in right perspective after appreciating the evidence on record. 5. For the foregoing, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. 6. However, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly in view of the submission made by the learned Counsel for the tenant, it is expedient to grant time of 4 (four) months to the tenant to vacate the petition schedule premises and also pay the arrears of rent. 7. It is further directed that the tenant shall continue to pay the admitted rents till such period. 8. To this effect, the tenant shall give an undertaking before the trial Court. 9. Subject to the above observations and directions, the civil revision petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission. ___________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 23rd October, 2009. Ak