IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 1241 of 2009 Between: V. Venkateswarlu S/o. Nagaiah R/o. Chittamuru Village & Mandal, Nellore District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector Sri Potti Sree Ramulu Nellore District, Nellore. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Gudur SPS. Nellore, District. 3 The Tahsildar Chittamur Chittamur Mandal, SPS. Nellore, District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or direction declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents in granting assignment patta in favour of petitioner in respect of the land covered by S.No. 389/2 an extent of Ac. 2-00 of Chittamur Village as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider the report submitted by the 3rd respondent in Rc.b./85/2008 dated 5-8-2008 and grant assignment patta in favour of the petitioner in respect of the land covered by S.No. 389/2 an extent of Ac. 2-00 of Chittamur Village. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner submitted an application, dated 22.07.2008, to the respondents, with a prayer to assign an extent of Acs.2.20 cents of land in survey No.389/2 of Chittamur Village. During the course of enquiry into the application by the second respondent, it is stated that objections were raised by the villagers as well as MLA stating that the petitioner already holds land and that he is an employee. The third respondent submitted a report, dated 05.08.2008, to the second respondent, narrating the said facts, and ultimately, expressing the view that the case of the petitioner may be considered. The grievance of the petitioner is that his case has not been considered so far. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. The representation submitted by the petitioner for assignment of the land has been enquired into and the final decision has to be taken by the Assigning Committee. It is not even stated that the meeting of the Committee has been held in the recent past. The petitioner has to await till the Committee meets, and his application needs to be placed before it. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing that the application, dated 22.07.2008, made by the petitioner, for assignment of land shall be placed before the Assigning Committee together with the relevant reports and records and it shall be considered in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated:29.01.2009. GJ