IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.11238 of 2010 1. RAM LOCHAN PANDIT son of Sri Bisheshwar Pandit, 2. Dinesh Pandit son of Shri Bisheshwar Pandit & 3. Maheshwar Pandit son of Late Ramjee Pandit Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 13.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 366-A, 120-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation in the First Information Report is that co- accused Ram Kumar Raushan @ Ramu Pandit had enticed the niece of the informant with the assistance of the present petitioners, who are cousins and uncle of Ram Kumar Raushan. In view of the fact that there is no direct link of the present petitioners in the occurrence, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani, in connection with Khutauna P.S. case no. 46 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)