THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.18522 of 2007 Dated 21st June, 2011 Between: N.Narendra Prasad …Petitioner And Municipal Corporation of Vijayawada, rep.by its Commissioner, Vijayawada …Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Meka Rajasekhara Reddy Counsel for respondent: Smt.G.Jhansi The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside notice, dated 23.08.2007, issued by the respondent and consequential direction not to interfere with the land admeasuring 340.5 sq.yards along with thatched house in R.S.No.165/6 situated at Ward No.32E, Door No.59A-21/1-8/5, Patamata, Vijayawada. The need for adjudication of this writ petition is obviated due to the fair submission of the learned counsel, Sri Meka Rajasekhara Reddy, appearing for the petitioner, that after filing of this writ petition, his client has filed a suit before the competent civil Court seeking injunction against the respondent from interfering with his property and that an interim order of status quo granted by the civil Court is subsisting. Having regard to this subsequent event, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the above mentioned remedy availed by him. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.23774 of 2007 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 21st June, 2011 VGB