IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL C- 482 No. 123 of 2004 Praveen Kumar Julka and another. …….Applicants. Versus Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Dehradun and others. ..Opposite Parties. Mr. M.S. Bisht, Advocate holding the brief of Sri Gopal Narain, learned counsel for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, learned A.G.A. is present for the State. Mr. H.M. Bhatia, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Arvind Vashisth, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 and 3. 16th September, 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. This application filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is directed against the orders dated 10.1.2001 and 4.3.2004 contained in Annexure no. 2 & 5 to the application and against the criminal complaint No. 2702/03 pending before the respondent no. 1. 2. Perused the order-dated 10.1.2001 passed by A.C.J.M. I, Dehradun (Annexure No. 2 to the application), wherein, a finding has been recorded that prima facie offence is made out against the applicant under Section 452, 504, 506 I.P.C. 3. The aforesaid finding is based upon the statements taken under Section 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. Thereafter, after taking into consideration the evidence available on record, the trial Court, Dehradun rejected the application of the applicants for rejection of the summoning order on the ground that there was no reason to recall the summoning order. 2 4. Thus, application filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. lacks merit and is dismissed. However, it is made clear that if the applicants move a bail application before the Magistrate concerned within two days from the date of production of the certified copy of this order, the same shall be decided within a further period of 15 days. Till the decision of the bail application, the applicants shall not be arrested. (P.C. Verma, J.) 16.9.2008 Rathour