IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : C. W. P. No. 15387 of 2011 Date of Decision : August 23, 2011 Suman .... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will be satisfied if legal notice Annexure P-4 served by the petitioner is decided by respondents no. 3 and 4 within stipulated time frame. In view of the aforesaid limited prayer, but without going into the merits of the claim of the petitioner, the instant writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondents no. 3 and 4 to take final decision in accordance with law on legal notice Annexure P-4 served by the petitioner, within two months of receipt of certified copy of this order. If claim of the petitioner is sought to be rejected, then speaking reasoned order shall be passed. August 23, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE