IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (a G ) WRIT PETITION No S$ (v g7 /2005 T / Kalawati Choudhary D/o Shri Premdas Choudhary, aged about 29 years, Resident of ViHage Am‘eratikra Post Bharridand TahSII Marwahi, District BHaspur (CG) i ‘ II I I I State of Chhattisgarh, Th rough: The Secreta ry, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, 'D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). JanTpad Pan‘chayat Marwahi ‘Throtugh The Chief Executwe 1Off1cer, Marwahi, district Bilaspur (C G ) I I T The Additional Coliéctor, Pendra Road, District Bilaspur (C.G.). The District Education Officer, Education District Bilaspur (C.G.). PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF ANS) wXRARI MANDAMUS ETC. AND? FOR IAPPROPRIATE @QRDER/ORDERS DIRECTION —L—— DIIRECTIONS I ii 0% BILASK’UR 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: AS per the cause titie. ’ CLER 2. PARTTCIJI ARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: . AS per the cause title. ,W HIGH COURT OF GHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR , 7 WRIT PETlTiON NO. 5368 of 2005 Petitionar Katawati ehoudhaw W Versus Rmndent State of Chhattisgarh & others WRIT PETtTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF VHE CONSTITUTION OF lNDlA (sB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihoui, .1.) Pmeng shri Adiigia Kum‘ar, Advocate with shri "PH, sahu", ‘ Advocate for the petitioner. ‘ Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Deputy Gavemment Advocam fo the _ State. OBDEB (9%L) (Passed on 7m DayofApril. 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitiqner submits that the reiief sought for in this petitioner has aiready been graded by the respondents and as such nothing survives for adjudication and this petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel appearing for the State does riot controvert the above submission. Accordingly, the ‘writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. i Sdl- i Satish K. Agnihotril Judge Arun r