3NVS> IS T8S HB3H CtMRT QF tW>HX-A E& ESH AT a'ABALPBR. Hlsc. iPetition HO^li _/93. PESITICSSBat ffeltFulHassaa, agsd aboate 52 years. SOR ef Hajl Mobd. bu^lasss - FoEes-fc asaateeaglsor, F/O Anbilcapw (H.P.) —VBESUS- 8ESPQKDBKSS: 1. Stea-fec e£ Madhya Throi»gh ( the SeeFafeary, BspaE'taeat o£ Eorsst, Vallabh Bbawan, Bhopal. 2. GaasCBvataE- e£ ?oicesfc, Sarguja Cirele, .totel.Kapw. 3. Bivisioaal W*t. ©f£ieer, Soafelt Sargaj*'?aa Kaaelal, Anbiltapw (N.».) ssTmeis ®c®& J»TIGIBS 226/227 o? 'CHS eei^TiT®x® Q? ISBI& F€R ISSTOUieS 0F A W&IT I»®ffi;S!^se®B,3 _ GSRTieR^ftI.. •KKffi&tSgS. mQSIBJ.'SlQS ANB,.E% M '<OT:a8R- S^I%ABIiS_ WtlT GK WB.I2S. eRBSS £»GRBSRS, BiaEe®Ii»861 DIREC'BICMS. 1 Xi-HC-22 ?s? ^ira?pt,-'3^Efte, facfiwy; v\f ,P. 2711/93 CT^'W T^W3!RSI s?nRi"B1?(T STI^E ?RiIW^fef .<». 9.8.<2061. i ! '•: i ^lcf.Maniitdca i MK.Gaataffl '•?rpif?r;tiiT tipTCTt' •? feist Tfesre . '37 3?PsfET 3]I^?r . Sta|clwastawa i£etfttfae petitioner'. Bbad|ucl. i>L ^or the respondeats . ' ""-He^yia.: •1" • '"' • Wflt>. 3,8n/2Ctoi ttists laeeh :£iled by respondent no.2 seekihg a <ait-eet3;on frfM ta.Ss couct to allow the autti<M?ttl,«s fco < clde t^e ^aiE^J&aX^^peridIasr before it wlthln 30 diays.-ft-.Bhaaur^ sulantit.s ^ifi pcayer iio^-ehat"t;y^"o&n^6^feat^a^^ has its final say ~in tl-ie niat'ter^ aitd if 'W^' aSSciyved by any oirdeii- to be passed' by '^e' c^nipet^^"i t1;p>or^ty, 'tt^ j^ shall have the: Ilbejrty to'apiMToach ttji.ls CourC. "" " ~ .Shri%aatava i€ As subnit.feetf tHat 'prayef thls cbiir't^ Xtstg"Tfer'ue ttoat •::l-i tfaat ^tr'w&uaa be fair to allow caun^.el fpr the petltloner I- ''s~v-^ subnult^i that> this d®^wery, |aelafeeA effopt sougtit to be e^rciged ^ respcmde^ ap^JA;jso* i(».-tfae interest of. justice In asmuchas the matter Kas joeeq pea^ing .befoce fehis Court since 1993 and no return ha^ been filed tlll date. Aoeordtngly r' e~£ riespsndent no«2 be rejected Sind tUe merits'bf ehie eas^la^KMBgi l»e^iBxeiBilned euad decided by tftere-~lB'"Xh(»rdii»ateclelayon tbe part o£ ttie a?festxsnd6nts 't&* <HLl®~''ltherefeurn in tbe laattei;'* <iv«u k>vtS^sy y-^-o The re<uest made byrespoa^ent B0.2 1s Indeed/iaBiSeal'able.. ..2 [Tf^''^teq «^ K , + 311^9T1racR (^gf^S^8? ) '•3"S'?T?r! 'toN.'sn^i gw?; fifsv sv^i ?siiwgtei 2. However, after heariTig tt^e counsel for both tbe sides / and looking *o the eafcir^ facts and Gircurestances of the -^^. case I am still inclined doae wl.tboute aay ^fUE-ther- of hearlag. Shrj; Bhadurl respOBdent no»2 to^tfaer '^T!rf?T'E?T^ 'qTO?ff ^ t^£t<[^1'(^;[< ^STpgiisii^i to^iie^e that it would be just and reasonatole to allow i^espondeint no«2 to examine ttte matter and pass necessarf ocder.. This bosyevershottld be dslay. This pcayer made Ot^ to^ ;ot respdndeht; ni3»2 As- ia^owed.bowever.subjecto^ to payment i??f'3~s of cost o£ iis.SOOO/—,Cosj|.,,should be paid be£ore the'dr' afaall coamiunlaate tbis order to ,With a .pofiy ;of this order. ^et; appecLl b&tteard .a^d jdisixjtsed o^£ fJjaa3.;lx by a speaking order ,by ^3I:.S:. , Mr. Sfar.i.va^dya sutan.ita. that tfals petltXon sbpuldl be teBt pe&dijttg, dl^sp.i.te^tAe ,a£or&saidiSto:ectlOBS. I anfc of tfte view :. that sjL®ceI tiaye alloced respOBdent no .2 to exeuniri,e the entiit-e matter_ on me.rlt.it wl.il not be me to say tli§t above a oteerv^Ltioits ;and "aispBsed'o'f.'"1 :!''". ~"--^ and caile ;fea aicainiiis tittie. .parefully cind pass ne<^& appear laefors resBondsftt; tha get.lticm^ staoytd be kept .^•^.- .;. ^'y^^', pending before this doxu-^because thje petitioner i£ aggrievea 'By' ahy orSer "t4* be passed by respondent as;^,,, is at t.tBerty t6 appi^ac]|t"thtS oottrt.' Xccordl.ngly ^tlreetJ.oBts-'IAB^ petit.ion : Xt j.s hpped that restx3>RdeBt.ao.2 w-lJLl tate evr. -\patn ^nfrir;®.aetter ssaxs on merit very ^ary drdier, L.et _the petitioner BQ.2 iS \oc. befRX-e 20.8.2001. Sd/-;' ^—-—^ CliiefJustice ^ : GKPRJ—FS'?11—1/200!—50,000. ^^^