IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14917 of 2008 LAKSHMAN PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 14.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the State Mr. Dasharath Mehta. Petitioner has challenged the order of cognizance dated 03.04.1998, whereby cognizance has been taken under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 452, 427, 307, 379, 380, 429, 436, 302, 120B of the IP.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Process under 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. were also issued. Petitioner has also challenged the revisional order dated 25.06.2007, whereby learned revisional Court refused to interfere with the order of cognizance. There is nothing on record to suggest the present stage of the case nor I find any infirmity in the impugned order, hence the application is dismissed. However learned counsel for the petitioner is at liberty to raise all his contentions at the time of framing of charge, if the charges have already not been framed in the matter. The application stands dismissed. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)