1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13190 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 8601 OF 2005 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13289 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 3409 OF 2003 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13290 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 3673 OF 2003 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13302 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 4088 OF 2003 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 18403 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 8602 OF 2005 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13190 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 8601 OF 2005 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13289 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 3409 OF 2003 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13290 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 3673 OF 2003 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13302 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 4088 OF 2003 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 18403 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 8602 OF 2005 *** 1. Heard Aedvocate Mr. Patil for the Applicant. Advocate Mr. Dhorde for Respondent Municipal Council. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13190 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 8601 OF 2005 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13289 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 3409 OF 2003 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13290 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 3673 OF 2003 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13302 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 4088 OF 2003 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 18403 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 8602 OF 2005 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. 2. Industrial Court has ordered grant of permanency to respective employee because of completion of 240 days. The Municipal Council has approached this Court with contention that their recruitment is not in accordance with law. Petitions are already admitted. This Court has not granted any interim relief. 3. It appears that later Municipal Council moved Regional Director of Municipal Administration and sought sanction from him to the appointment of present Applicants. The said proposal came to be rejected because of pendency of a writ petition before Division 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13190 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 8601 OF 2005 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13289 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 3409 OF 2003 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13290 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 3673 OF 2003 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13302 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 4088 OF 2003 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 18403 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 8602 OF 2005 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. Bench which challenged the action of Municipal Council in granting regularisation/ permanency to its employees like present applicants and also because of pendency of present writ petitions. 4. The other petition has been dismissed by Division Bench of this Court and thereafter on 4th March, 2011 the Municipal Council has again moved the Divisional Commissioner. 5. In this situation, applications are filed before this Court seeking direction to Municipal Council to release yearly increments to the applicants. I am not 4 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13190 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 8601 OF 2005 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13289 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 3409 OF 2003 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13290 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 3673 OF 2003 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13302 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 4088 OF 2003 AND CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 18403 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 8602 OF 2005 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. inclined to interfere in the matter. Applications are, therefore, rejected. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:11/03/2011. ans/13190