.abs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 6 OF 2007 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 137 OF 2006 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : coram, appearances, Court’s Orders: Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar Orders: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.V.Y. Sanglikar for the petitioner. Mr.P.D. Ghandy i/b Maneksha & Sethna for the respondent. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 26TH NOVEMBER 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The review petition was admitted in view of the contrary view taken by the Division Bench of this Court in Smt. Lilabai Gajanan Pansare v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (First Appeal No.1245 of 2004 decided on 20th December 2006). 3. Learned counsel for the respondent states that the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Smt. Lilabai - 2 - Gajanan Pansare has been set aside by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.5136 of 2008. 4. In view of the fact that the decision of the Division Bench in Smt. Lilabai Gajanan Pansare has been set aside, there is no ground for review of my judgment. Hence the revision petition is dismissed. Interim relief, if any granted by this Court, stands vacated. 5. Learned counsel for the review petitioner, however, submits that the Hon’ble Supreme Court has granted one year’s time to the respondent to vacate the premises. This is disputed by the counsel for the respondent stating that the condition of filing an undertaking in the Supreme Court has not been complied by the appellant. Needless to say that the parties are bound by the order of the Supreme Court and only the stay granted by this Court is vacated. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)