Regular Second Appeal No.508 of 1989(O&M) --1-- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.508 of 1989(O&M) Date of decision: 21.12.2011 Balbir Singh & others ....Appellants Versus Tarlok Singh and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Ramesh Goyal, Advocate for the applicant-respondents. ---- Ritu Bahri, J.(Oral) CM No.12482 of 2011 Notice of motion. Counsel for the appellant accepts notice and states that he has no objection if the application is allowed. CM application for impleading the legal representatives of Tarlok Singh-respondent No.1 is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM No.12483-C of 2011 This is an application for placing on record the compromise entered between the parties on 08.09.1995 (Annexure R-1/2). Allowed as prayed for. RSA No.508 of 1989 Learned counsel for the applicant-respondent contends Regular Second Appeal No.508 of 1989(O&M) --2-- that during the pendency of the Regular Second Appeal, a compromise has been effected between the parties. As per the compromise the plaintiff and the defendants have been residing together by sharing the house. With the intervention of practical and respectable persons of the society, a compromise has been entered into between the parties and divided both the houses as per the possession of the respective parties by treating as owners and both the parties have agreed that if any party back out from this agreement then the same shall make the payment of Rs.50,000/- to the other party as damages and amount of compensation can be claimed through court even from the property of the person concerned. Learned counsel for the applicant-respondents wants to withdraw the Regular Second Appeal. Dismissed as withdrawn. (RITU BAHRI) JUDGE 21.12.2011 sonika