IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.38775 of 2009 TINKU SINGH @ SAURABH KUMAR SINGH, S/o Bijay Singh, resident of village- Padumker, P.S. Patahi, District- East Champaran ...Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ...OP ----------- 2/ 07.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 341, 323, 328 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The background of the case is that one Vidyanchal Singh had dispute with his daughter-in-law Sangita Singh, who is a widow, and to implicate her has got instituted the present case through his grand daughter Aparna Kumari, the informant of the present case. The petitioner has no concern with the dispute between Vindyanchal Singh and his daughter-in-law i.e. the mother of the informant and he is only agnate of Vidyanchal Singh, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 16.6.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Chhatauni P.S. case no.35 of 2007, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, and (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)