IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36991 of 2010 SUNIL NAGAR @ SUNIL PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 07.10.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is in custody since 24.12.2009 in connection with Deo P.S. Case No. 64 of 2004 under Section 364(A), 34 of the Indian Penal Code. According to the F.I.R., the brother of the informant had gone for morning walk at about 4.30 a.m. He did not return. The informant suspected that one co-accused Raju Singh might have kidnapped him. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after 3 – 4 days the brother of the informant namely Govind Pd. Gupta was recovered from the house of his own relative. One accused Sujit Kumar was arrested by police who confessed and in his confessional statement name of this petitioner finds place. The learned counsel further submitted that similarly situated co-accused persons namely Raju Singh and others have already been granted bail by different benches of this Court. On the other hand the learned A.P.P. objected the prayer for bail. It appears that the brother of the informant has been recovered. Only on suspicion the F.I.R. was lodged 2 against one Raju Singh. Raju Singh has already been granted bail. The other co-accused persons Uday Mahto, Usha Devi, Bhola Singh, Syam Sundari Devi, Rajneesh Kumar, Amrish Kumar, Sujeet Kumar and Raju Singh have already been granted bail by different benches of this Court. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner namely, Sunil Nagar @ Sunil Paswan, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Aurangabad in connection with Deo P.S. Case No.64 of 2004. S.S. ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)