THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No.4045 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner who is the defendant files this revision under Section 25 of the Provisional Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 inter alia assailing the correctness of the decree passed in S.C.No.7/2005, dated 13-6-2008 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kovur. The brief facts are, that in respect of a borrowed amount of Rs.2,500/- on 5-12-2002, the petitioner defendant executed a promissory note, on the basis of which the respondent-plaintiff filed the present suit for recovery thereof along with interest. The said suit was contested by the petitioner inter alia on the ground that the said suit pro-note is a rank forgery created by the plaintiff due to political rivalry. Subsequent to the framing of issues both sides proceeded with the trial. The respondent-plaintiff examined himself as PW.1 and marked Exs.A.1 to A.4 and the petitioner-defendant herself was examined as DW.1, but no document was marked. The lower Court, after considering the evidence and material, though the other version as to the hand loan was not accepted, held that the suit promissory note Ex.A.1 was proved and decreed the suit rejecting the claim of the petitioner. It is against this finding the petitioner has come up by way of this revision. Having heard the counsel and on perusal of the material, it is seen that the suit itself being a small cause with a limited jurisdiction does not call for comprehensive enquiry on par with a regular civil suit. Prima facie there is evidence on behalf of the respondent-plaintiff, which has remained unshaken by the evidence of PW.1 as could be evident from Ex.A.1 suit pro-note. The suit was preceded by a legal notice, which remained un- replied. In the circumstances, the lower Court accepting the evidence of the respondent-plaintiff held that the suit pro-note is true and valid, and it is not open for this Court to go into the evidence to re-appreciate once again to come to a different conclusion. In the circumstances, I do not find any merits in the revision. The revision is accordingly dismissed. No costs. __________________ B.PRAKASH RAO,J Date: 12-08-2010 Grk