THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.94 of 2005 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is filed by the petitioner-complainant against the judgment, dated 20.10.2004, rendered in C.C.No.1194 of 2003 by the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad, whereby and where under the learned trial Judge acquitted the accused under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C. for the offences under Sections 419, 420, 468, 471 read with Section 34 IPC. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner raised the following points: 1. the trial Court erroneously acquitted the accused on the ground that the invocation of Section 195 Cr.P.C. is not entered into service and 2. the hand-writings obtained by the investigation officer can be taken into consideration to convict the accused. The short facts of the case are that the respondents-accused forged the signature of the complainant and produced the documents to the Registrar of Companies and also filed before the civil Court whereby they induced the registrar of companies to register them as members of committee of Kanyaka Parameswari Devasthana Sangam, Secunderabad. This court perused the entire record and also the judgment of the lower court. Admittedly, the respondent-accused signatures are not obtained by the investigation officer to compare the same with the alleged forged signatures and further it is the case of the petitioner- complainant that the accused forged the signatures of them, but whereas it is evident from the record that theinvestigation officer has not chosen to obtain the signature of the complainant also to compare the same with the signatures found in the forged documents. In the absence of any such scientific verification of the forgery by the accused persons and that too in the absence of any investigation to that effect, the learned trial Judge acquitted the accused. It is well settled law that two views are possible in the nature of this case, one is it is in favour of the accused and the other is in favour of the complainant. In the given facts and circumstances of the case, there is no need to interfere with the order of the trial Court and the revision is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. ___________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO Date:01.07.2011 Rns