HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.616 OF 2010 ORDER: Petitioner filed W.P. No.16728 of 2009 alleging that her immediate neighbours made constructions in deviation of the sanctioned plan and the respondent herein did not take any steps, though a representation was made. The writ petition was disposed of on 18-12-2009 directing the respondent herein to take steps within two (2) months from the date of receipt of that order. 2. This Contempt Case is filed alleging that the 1st respondent did not comply with the orders. Respondent filed counter - affidavit stating that in pursuance of the orders of this Court, site was inspected on 23-08-2010 and notice was served upon respondents 2 and 3 in the writ petition under Section 452 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short ‘GHMC Act’). 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. 4. It is no doubt true that there is some delay on the part of the respondent herein in taking steps that were indicated in the orders passed by this Court in the writ petition. Notice under Section 452 of the GHMC Act was issued on 23-08-2010. Across the Bar, it is stated that respondents 2 and 3 have filed Writ Petition No.2214 of 2010 before this Court and that the petitioner herein is arrayed as a party. 5. Therefore, the Contempt Case is closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue her remedies in the pending writ petition. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J September 24, 2010. KTL