Lrs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8497 OF 2009 Wani Suryakant Dhondu .. Petitioner. vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors .. Respondents. Mr A.A.Garje with Ms Deepali Patil , Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr V.S.Masurkar, A.G.P. for the Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED : 18TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C. So far as suspension period of the petitioner spent on duty is concerned, the Tribunal has not interfered with the order passed by Respondent No.3 on the ground that the petitioner was not given clean acquittal by the Special Judge in Spl.Case No. 63/2003. On behalf of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner draws the attention of this Court to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Krishnakant Bibhavnekar vs. State of Maharashtra (1997) 3 SSC 636. We find that the petitioner’s acquittal was on technical grounds. In other words, it was not a clean acquittal. No error of law is ascertainable from the order of the Tribunal. Hence, petition is rejected. (K.K.TATED, J.) (F,I. REBELLO,J.)