IN mE HIGI CQJRT OF WRxI Pannm 310.55% WRIT Pgnnm UNDER gRHCLE 2g6/2g7 OF 1H5 cowsnrunw W INDIA, PETI THDNER RESP ONNTS DE ? é f C7 7 m 3. b. 5. 6. Vidhyadhar, Son of $hri’ Chandrabhan, Dharam Singh, S/o Shrl Manohar Suklal Son of Shri Samaru, 10. (N0 1 To lo ARE RESIDENIs a? vILLAGE PATRA-PALx (East), TAHSIL & msmmr. RAIGARH '(M.P.))’. 'll. L1! . :K f2 12. )L l3. JUDIC£IURE, mama PmDEsx-x Ar JABALPUB 9F 1999 . Jai‘kumar‘ Patel; Son of Shri 'Nanayan Patel, Aged about 34 year$§LSaxpanch of Gram Panchayat Patm—Pali (East) , Tahsil & District-mIGAH-I (M.P.) VERSUS Gajanazd Agarw’al, H San of Shri Tara Chand Agamal, Satyavadi, San of Shri Narad. Santosh, Son af Rameshwar, Kgnhaiya, Son of Shri MUkutram Santosh, Son sf Shri Dewal, Babulal, Son of Ghumu,‘ Arjun Son of Shri Gelha ‘Janpad Panchayat Raigartu “ERCIJGH : its Chief Executive Officer ' Callector, District RAIGARH (M.P.) Shri $.K. Jaiswal, Additional Collector, RAIGABH (M.P.) Contd. . y V14 Sub Divisional Office: & ’ Prescribed Officer, BAIGAH-i (M.P.) ’q/ 15. State of Madhya ’PradGSh, ‘ mRCUGH : $ecretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, BHOPAL (M.P.) Pea IssugggE OF wmw mE NAIURE OF CEafegaaL ggpésgmg; mEIGRDERoF mg gum 11mm coLLacroR, gmmm, DATED 4.249%, ‘EAssaD IN PgNCHAYAT APPEaL qxSE No,2g.a-§g(g&gg wxmwr Jumsmcnm, GxvmG pERvaRsE HNDING - . Jaikumar Patel HIGH COURT OF 'CHHATTISGARH AT B!LASPUR WRIT PETmON No. 568 OF 1999 Petitioner Versus Respondents Gajanand Agarwal & Others WRIT PETITICN UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF iNDlA (SB : Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihokri, J.) Present :- None for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri; Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Fasseo‘ on 08‘“ day of December, 2013) 1" The matter is caHed for hearing. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. in View of the above, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.