IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRIMINAL REVISION No.765 OF 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 12, 2011 Amrinder Singh @ Babli ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.B.P.S.Virk, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.N.D.S.Mann, Addl.A.G.Punjab, for the State. Mr.K.S.Brar, Advocate, for Mr.I.S.Brar, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. This revision has been filed by the petitioner against the order, whereby he has been summoned as an additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. During the pendency of this petition, the petitioner has been convicted for the offences charged. Accordingly, the counsel submits that the present revision petition is rendered infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. October 12, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE