THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.8382 OF 2010 Dated 15th April, 2010 Between: Mendu Sathi Reddy …Petitioner And The Assistant Commissioner of Police, L.B.Nagar, Cyberabad and 3 others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri V.Sai Kumar Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP for Home The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is based on a vague and unsubstantiated grievance of the petitioner that respondent Nos.2 and 3 are interfering in the civil dispute between him and respondent No.4. According to the petitioner, when respondent No.4 sought to interfere with his construction activity over the land admeasuring 80 square yards in plot No.1/A in Survey No.9/1/F situated at Alkapuri Colony, Ward No.11, Block No.13, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, he approached respondent Nos.2 and 3 with a complaint. The petitioner’s grievance is that far from helping him, respondent Nos.3 and 4 have interfered with the construction activity and suggested to him to approach the civil Court and obtain an order in his favour before resuming the construction activity. The petitioner failed to file any evidence in support of his allegations. If respondent No.4 is interfering with his construction activity, the petitioner is entitled to approach the civil Court for appropriate relief. However, it is not permissible for respondent Nos.2 and 3 to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.4. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.10793 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 15th April, 2010 lur