IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22900 of 2009 PAWAN SAH @ BADRI SAH, SON OF LATE BAIJU SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ARAR UNDER P.S. SANOKHAR, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under sections 357, 380 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. In the first information report, suspicion has been raised by the informant against the petitioner of having committed burglary in her house. Subsequently, it is stated that all the stolen articles were recovered from the house of another person on the confessional statement of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a next door neighbour of the informant and due to enmity, he has been implicated in this case. The recovery of the articles including cash said to have been stolen has only been made to implicate the petitioner in this case. Petitioner is in custody since 3.1.2009 and it is stated that he has no criminal antecedent. - 2 - Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed. Petitioner (Pawan Sah @ Badri Sah) is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri D.K. Jaiswal, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Bhagalpur in connection with Sanokhar P.S. case No.01/09 (G.R. No.13/09). B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)