1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 10th day of February, 2011 First Bail Application No. 94 of 2011 Criminal Side Amit Katariya S/o Hukam Chand R/o Ravidas Basti P.S Kankhal Dist Haridwar …….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…..Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 196 of 2010 Under Sections: 302 I.P.C. Police Station: Kotwali District: Haridwar Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. G.S.Sandhu, G.A. present for the State. Applicant–Amit Katariya, who is in jail in connection with Case Crime No. 196 of 2010, relating to offence punishable under Section 302 I.P.C police station Kotwali, District Haridwar has sought his release on bail. Heard. 2 Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that it is a case of circumstantial evidence and there is no eye witness of commission of murder. It is further pointed out that co accused Tinku has already been directed to be released on bail. It is also submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view, that the applicant deserves bail. Bail Application is allowed. Let the applicant-Amit Katariya be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Vacation Judge Dt.10.02.2011 N.P