IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39986 of 2010 RADHEY SHYAM PANDIT AND SITA RAM PANDIT BOTH SONS OF SHRI JAGDISH PANDIT ,RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MACHARHATTA GALI,P.S.KHAJEKALA,PATNA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21.12.2010 Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri A.M.P.Mehta, Additional Public Prosecutor. The petitioners who are in custody in Khajekala P.S. Case No.19/10 for the offence under section 304(B) of I.P.C. since 7.5.2010 have prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to accident the wife of younger brother of the petitioner got fire injury and thereafter she was carried to hospital on 22.1.2010 and died on 15.2.2010 in course of treatment. On the statement of the husband of the deceased a U.D. case was registered. After the death of the daughter of the informant the present case with a new story was got instituted. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that younger brother of the husband of the deceased Krishna Pandit has been extended the privilege of bail vide Cr.Misc. 2 No.40526/10 on 10.11.2010 by a Bench of this Court and as such the petitioners may be granted bail. Learned Addl.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail. Keeping in view the fact that initially a U.D. Case was registered as well as the fact that one of the co-accused having almost similar allegations has been extended the privilege of bail, there is no reason to deny the prayer for bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioners, Radhey Shyam Pandit and Sita Ram Pandit, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Patna City,Patna, in Khajekala P.S. Case No.19/10. Anilkr.sinha (Rakesh Kumar,J.)