IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12258 of 2010 1. KAPILDEO YADAV S/O SHIVNATH YADAV R/O BASMATIA, P.S.- CHANAN, DISTT.- LAKHISARAI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, LAKHISARAI 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, LAKHISARAI 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, CHANAN, LAKHISARAI 6. THE MEMBER, DISTRICT TEACHER NIYOJAN APPELLATE AUTHORITY, LAKHISARAI 7. THE MUKHIA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, MAHESH LETA 8. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ MAHESH LETA CHANAN, LAKHISARAI ----------- 02. 29.03.2011 The appellate authority has categorically held after verifying the original records, that there was no complaint pending before the erstwhile authority before the District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal was moved in this regard by way of a complaint by the petitioner. The Tribunal has rightly declined to entertain the application at such a belated stage. Since matter related appointment of panchayat teacher in the year 2006. Counsel for the petitioner now produces an application which is supposed to be a copy of the original annexed as Annexure-3. On reading thereof Court is not convinced about the authenticity of such 2 petition but if the petitioner is confident about its authenticity, let him establish the same before the appellate authority by producing the original. However, no interference in the impugned order is required at this stage writ is disposed of. Mkr. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)