IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9842 of 2010 1. MAN BAHAR HAZAM S/O RASID HAZAM R/O VILL.- MATEYA, P.S. KUCHAI KOT, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR, SARAN 3. THE ANCHALADHIKARI, KUCHAIKOT, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 4. PANPATI DEVI W/O KESHAV SINGH R/O VILL.- MATEYA KHAS, P.S.- KUCHAIKOT, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 5. SUNITA DEVI W/O PAPU SINGH R/O VILL.- MATEYA KHAS, P.S.- KUCHAIKOT, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 6. SMT. SUKANTI RAI W/O SHIV SHANKAR SINGH R/O VILL.- MATEYA KHAS, P.S.- KUCHAIKOT, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 7. URMILA DEVI W/O UMESH SINGH R/O VILL.- MATEYA KHAS, P.S.- KUCHAIKOT, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ 8. MUKHIYA, MATEYA KHAS PANCHAYAT, P.S.- KUCHAIKOT, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ ********** 2 05/07/2010 The petitioner has filed this application for cancelling the settlement of land made in favour of respondents 3 to 7 on the basis of DAN PATRA. It would be proper that the petitioner should move the authorities concerned in this matter. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner being the interested party was not noticed in this matter. I find that the relevant facts with respect to the date of settlement etc. have not been stated in the writ application. In the circumstances, the petitioner may avail the alternative remedy available to him. This application is accordingly disposed of. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )