IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fSl N0. &aA6 /2010 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. PETITIONER Y\V j\\o .z-^' F.S. •-^"y^ ^ RESPONDENTS Balwant Singh Chandrawanshi, aged about 42 years, son of Shri Dev Singh Chandrawanshi, occupation - Asst. Teacher,Presently working as Upper Division Teacher, GovtMiddle School - Mohbhatta, Vikas Khand - Mohala, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Tribal, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Asst. Commissioner, Deptt of Tribal, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) Joint Director (Treasury, A/c & Pension), Raipur (CG) Block Education Officer, Block - Mohala, DistL Rajnandgaon (CG). •I'WttiStS.i®^^ <?i-se!li!s'». ff!^8^\ ^jy^ l^^^p ^ ^.^^ "*-sas-si-"XfHG—1S ail^t ^I lt;-li+. WTaii^rgi'qw ^s( "4l'4ld'4, yfl^'is, (s«?ii'Hy ^-^.^....t(s.w..'a3'L<'.l.z0.1^ r sti^i 'vw ('^g^t?) ^renwdtei sn^i SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra IVIoha 29-07-2010 Shri A. N. Bhakta, counsel fo| Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel advance copy. l-1eard. the petitioner. L|awyer for the State/respondents on Leamed counsel appearing) petitioner is entitled to benefit of NO he having passed B.T.t. examinati^ cost. It is submitted that the issue longer res integra and the same h^ Supreme Court in the case of AsHp 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59. It is furtl^er taken a similar view in his ot W.P.(S)No.6257of2008. Learned 4. attention of this Court to order dat^d No. 124 of 2009, wherein relying up4 in the oase of Asha Saxena (supra)| another Writ Appeal No. 87/2009) consideration of the oase for granf cireular dated 21-09-1974 issued bi verification of the facts pleaded in th| Learned oounsel for the re< petitioner would also be considered 4)W^4iTl ^TTO^ff ^ I^St <f^T^R ^sifm 3ii^a l5jwivastava, J. for the petitioner submits that the advance inorements on account of in before his appointment at his own involved in the present petition is no s been finally decided by the Hon'ble Saxena vs. State of M.P. & Ors., subniitted that this Court has also [der dated 06.02-2009 passed in |ounset for the petitioner further draws 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal |n the juctgment of the Supreme Court [and the order passed by this Court in directions have been issued for of two advance increments as per ^ the State of Madhya Pradesh, after e petition. ^ponden.ts submits that case of the ?n the same lines. -dE •^; isy:' XI-HC—78 3(1^1 ^ilf^tR; 's'n sn^y iiiiro Tumane TST r*ii<)io'M, ytil'H'Ko, Rioiyy ..^.•.l-.(Slcfy.;.'l?'2:o/.2Al£ sn^i 'q^? ('^rf^ST) ?^<ITW ^lfel SII^'I —2_. In view of the statement disposed of with a direotion to the chrat^l'T 'tnTf^r ^* f^r <fyi^i< ^siRpTsntH made above, this petition is finaliy •espondent authorities to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner f^r grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21-09-1974 issijied by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification ofthe faots pleadep in the petition within a penod of eight weeks from today. Sd/- 1 Manindra Mohan Shrivastava? Judge