@@ C/ M \040 / ‘ '» BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR $ingia Eemih‘ w.P._(S) No.44 1g 12009 Petitioner Vinod Tiwari, S/o Shri Roshan Lal Tiwari, Aged about 46 years, Presently posted as Accountant, Baderajpur Block, District Bastar (C.G.) R/o Keshkai, Biock Narharpur, District Kanker (C.G.) Versus Respondents : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe Development, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Department of Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe Development, District Bastar (C.G.) / W, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF lNDlA ) 3am m W \ w...€.’...(‘:>..2 Ha E200 7 ’wmm mm mmwfwq) lawman?“ 3B: HON’BLE SHRI JUSTECE Pi 17.8 9009 Shn Kasxf Shakeal couns1 Sbn Vwek Sharma, P L Ic The hmlted contentlon 0. that against his impugned tre petltloner has already made a r 6.8.2009 bu the same has nJ direction may be issued to the a pending representation 0f the pe WW WIW anifmm petitioner Iriake a fresh represé representation and the same we law, Accordingly, the petition the petitioner to make a fresh re days from the date of receipt would be decided by the aut period of three weeks from the {ITINKER DIWAKER ‘1 for the petitioner. xr the State. the counsel for the petitioner is nsfer order dated 306.2009 the =presentation Annexure P/S dated ‘ t been decided. He submits that Athority concerned for deciding the titioner expeditiously. Contention of the countel for the State is that let the tntation giving reference of earlier uid be decided in accordance with is disposed of with a direction to ipresentation Within a period of ten " copy of this order and the same ority concerned Within a further tE ()fits I‘eCeipt ,e"/.: A) / r Aug/ (7/ ,M’ / iwz‘k“ / ?r\““ke “Gge l J e