IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.16602 of 2011 Date of Decision.06.09.2011 Bhagwati Medicos, House No.174, Sector 15-A, Chandigarh through its partner Dr. Kamal Lalit .....Petitioner Versus Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGI) Chandigarh through its Director and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Ashok Bector, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-5), which has been issued on behalf of the petitioner claiming the amount for the works done, is considered by the addressee and appropriate decision is taken regarding the payment. The respondent No.1 shall consider the demand made through the representation under Annexure P-5 within a period of two months and if the liability is admitted, the amount shall be forthwith released preferably within a period of one month from that date. 2. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 06, 2011 Pankaj*