IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP-T No. 5952/2008 Decided on:15.6.2010 _____________________________________________ Dr. Vijay Thakur. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Lokender Thakur, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr R.P., Singh, Asstt. Advocate General. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Assistant Advocate General has placed on record copy of communication dated 30.12.1999. The text of letter dated 30.12.1999 reads thus: “I am directed to refer to your letter No. OA- 2018/99-12450 dated the 15th December, 1999, on the subject cited above and to say that the matter has been reconsidered by the Government in view of the contents of your letter and now a revised sanction in the name of the Governor in respect of Dr. Vijay Kumar Thakur has been issued 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 regarding the grant of study leave. A copy of the sanction order is enclosed. You are also requested to hand over the copy of Dr. Vijay Kumar Thakur in the court to the learned counsel of the applicant.” In view of the contents of communication dated 30.12.1999, the petition has rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed having become infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 15.6.2010 *awasthi*