[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2006 IN IN IN MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.37 OF 2006 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.37 OF 2006 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.37 OF 2006 IN IN IN PETITION NO. A-482 of 2006 PETITION NO. A-482 of 2006 PETITION NO. A-482 of 2006 Mr.Manoj Mohan Karnik .. Applicant vs Anupama Manoj Karnik .. Respondent Ms.Suvarna Joshi,Advocate and Ms. Rita K.Joshi Advocate i.b A.D.Shetty for Applicant Mr.N.P.Deshpande,Advocate for Respondent CORAM : K.J. ROHEE, J. CORAM : K.J. ROHEE, J. CORAM : K.J. ROHEE, J. DATE : 15TH MAY, 2006. DATE : 15TH MAY, 2006. DATE : 15TH MAY, 2006. p.c. 1. Heard Ms.Suvarna Joshi, Advocate for the husband and Mr.N.P.Deshpande Advocate for wife. 2. Mr.N.P.Deshpande for the wife submits that the daughter may not be willing to leave the mother and that the husband is free to come to meet his daughter at anytime. It may be noted that the husband resides at Andheri whereas the wife resides at Pune. In that case, it may not be possible for the husband every time to go to Pune. Hence, the following order : [2] " The wife is directed to leave the daughter in the custody of the husband for two weeks from 17/5/2006 around 10 a.m. With this, the application is disposed of. " (K.J. ROHEE J.) (K.J. ROHEE J.) (K.J. ROHEE J.)