1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application (CAO) No. 1128 of 2009 in Misc. Civil Application (St.) No. 19029 of 2009 in Second Appeal NO. 354/2006 (D) (Shamrao Natthuji Mahure ...VERSUS... Ramdeobaba Devasthan) =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. R. Sharma, Adv. H/f Mr. Anand Parchure, Advocate for the applicant. C ORAM : C.L.PANGARKAR, J. DATED : 29th MARCH, 2010. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the respondents. This civil application has been moved for condonation of delay in filing application for restoration of the Second Appeal No. 354/2006, which came to be dismissed for default. The respondent opposes the application on the ground that there is no sufficient reason given in the application for condonation of delay. It is stated in the application that the appellant could not notice the matter and could not remain present in the Court and was not aware about the dismissal of the appeal. Considering this fact, the delay of 602 days in filing application for restoration of second appeal is 2 condoned. For the reasons stated in the Misc. Civil Application (St.) No. 19029/2009 for restoration, the same is allowed. Second Appeal No. 354/2006 is restored to file, subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,000/- by the applicant to the respondent, before 8th April, 2010. Interim stay to the execution of decree, till then. Stand over to 8/4/2010. JUDGE. Diwale