1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2520 OF 2011. Ku. Priya d/o Shaligram Dhore. ..Vrs.. The State of Maharashtra, thr. Secretary to Government Medical Education and Research Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and Others. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. ( Shri R. V. Gaikwad, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri N. W. Sambre, Government Pleader for respondent No.1 Shri Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.2.) -0-0- CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & P. D. KODE, J J. DATED : 01 st August, 2011. In view of subsequent developments learned Counsel Shri Gaikwad seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to take recourse to such other remedies available in law to petitioner. According to him, petitioner got a knowledge of declaration of result, when reply affidavit was filed before this Court. Shri Deshpande, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 states that result was declared even prior to filing of petition and the respondent No.3 College was informed accordingly. He contends that therefore no other remedies are now available to the 2 petitioner. Learned Government Pleader for the respondent No.1 and Shri Naik, learned Counsel for the respondent No.3 support the argument of Shri Deshpande, the learned Counsel for the respondent No. 2 We do not find it necessary to go in to the merit of nature of controversy. The disputed question can be resolved before the appropriate authority. With liberty to petitioner to take recourse of such remedies, as law provides, present Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE JUDGE Deshmukh