IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6297 of 2010 1. CHHOTU @ VISHAL GOPE. 2. Pappu Gope @ Shailendar Kumar. Both are sons of Late Yugal Kishore Gope. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 29.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioners are not named in the First Information Report and subsequently as recorded in paragraph 29 of the case diary one person has allegedly stated but it was rumour that the petitioners are involved in the present occurrence. Apart from such there is no legal material against the petitioners. In view of such, let the petitioners above named who are in custody since 25.08.2009 and 31.08.2009 respectively be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 249 of 2008 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The 2 bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. The petitioners have been directed to report to the S.P. for nine months vide Cr. Misc. No. 3887 of 2010 in view of the antecedents which order they will strictly comply with. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)