BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16413 of 2011 1 R.P. KARUPPANAN 2 S. ILLAMI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 & 2 Vs STATE THROUGH BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM POLICE STATION, IN CRIME NO.222/2011, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.SUBASH BABU Advocate For Respondent : M/S.R.RAMACHANDRAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Section 420, 465, 468, 471 of IPC in Crime No.222 of 2011 and seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have been arrayed as A.1 and A.2 in the said case. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case on the allegation that petitioners forged a Gift Deed and sold the property to the other accused. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners have been implicated in this case on the allegation of committing forgery of the Gift Deed and the investigation is pending. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the entire allegations are borne out by records and documents, this Court is of the considered view that the custodial interrogation in respect of the petitioners are not required and this Court is constrained to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate , Natham, on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police for a period of four weeks daily at 5.30 p.m. and thereafter, he shall be available for interrogation as and when required. The second petitioner shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 20/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NATHAM, DINDIGUL DIST 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. M.SUBASH BABU Advocate SR.No.44637 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16413 of 2011 Date :20/12/2011 SMA/21.12.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/