1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 2538/2010. Milind Madhukarrao Labde -: VERSUS :- Shri Gajanan Maharaj Shikshan Sanstha and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 13, 2010. Heard Shri V.A. Kothale, learned Counsel for petitioner, Shri R.D. Khade, learned counsel for respondents no.1 and 2 and learned A.G.P. for respondent no.3. The matter was heard earlier and as petitioner / employee has already secured employment w.e.f. 14.07.1997, efforts to settle the controversy amicably were undertaken. Today accordingly, a joint Pursis has been filed by the parties. Pursis is signed by the counsel for petitioner Shri Kothale, for self and on behalf of the petitioner and by counsel for respondents as also by headmaster on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2. Shri Kothale, learned counsel has stated that the date 14.07.1997 must find mention in the Pursis as otherwise the present employment and entitlement of petitioner may be prejudiced. Shri Khade, learned Counsel is opposing the efforts. 2 However, I find that the petitioner is not claiming any amount or any relief from respondent nos. 1 and 2 either prior to 14.07.1997 or then after 14.07.1997. The respondent nos. 1 and 2 are not prejudiced in any way by inclusion of the said date in the Pursis. The petitioner is only interested in continuity so that his earlier service with respondents no.1 and 2 can be clubbed with his present service after 14.07.1997. It is therefore, made clear that as the petitioner is not in the employment of respondent nos. 1 and 2 from 14.07.1997, he is not claiming any salary or any monetary benefit from them after that date. His entitlement to claim the same for period prior to 14.07.1997 is given up by him. This fact is therefore recorded only to avoid any confusion and to preserve continuity of service in the interest of petitioner. Pursis is accordingly accepted. Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of this order. The petitioner is accordingly entitled to continuity from the date of his entry in service with respondent nos. 1 and 2 as found by the School Tribunal i.e. 04.11.1991. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.