mTHE mGHC( ItIOF DI£^I3I ATB^ CHHATTISGARH WRn^PE^ITIONNO.<%2^of2005 PETITIONERS/ DEFENDi FFSS. My ^'My / ^^y .S^^W -i^y ^^y ^sv./ ^^r ^ ^ ^\. M/s Cairy co, 26, Zakaria Street, Galcutta - 73, Transport Conipany havmg .Brancli office at New Klmrsipar, Bfailai (Chliattisgalfa) througli partnfir Saroj Saraf, W/o Dilip •Rumar Saral^ aged about 40 years, 26 Zakaria Street, Calcutta. y^2. Mfs G.astyce, New Kltusipar, Bhilai, Braiich of Carryce Transport GQmpaay ofCalcutta. Versus RESiPONDENT/ PLAINTIFF / Bharat Refractory^ Limited, a compaHy in<%r^^ Indian Companies Act fuiu^oning ^ jShilai uii.der the narue and styfe of Bhilai Se6actone&f ;Plairt, BhiN (Chhattisgarfa). ^PETrFIQEsfMSDER.^R'TIGI.E;227..C)R THE; ">^ . •' . • •CONSTITUTIONWINDIA- : .•'' '-1[; >dTrei ^toirt«,u>Tfl'M<i<»,Ririi'(-)y'< *fl*l«l^TT^ \^,f. I^D'S't^^eCiS' ^200 3lT^?iq^F (ijcii^d^) an^?T^rR'fi<b gaiT3Il^?Td>*<i* ^. 9-,w ••''/ s'RirsiT^ifeTan^r 27-10-2005. W.P,No^226 of2QQ5, Heard Shri V.R. Tiwari, lea| This is petition is filed agi by the Second Additional Session|s an application ffled under Ord< petitioners/defendante. Leamed counset i for the raised in the application under Qr taken in the writteri statement before the Second Additional Sest The trial Court after hearihg on the ground that the said appl raised in the written statement. irregularity in the impugned order] the Second Additional Sessionl interference by this Court under Accordingly, the petition is| Consequently, M.W.P. No.8524 of 2005 sfand disposed fned counsel for Uie petitioners. i|inst the order dated 04.04.1997 passed Judge, Durg in Civil Suit No.36-8/94 in ^r 7 Rute 11 of. C.P.C. filed by ttie <pl<<[n<Ill«)l*fnT^[(^'^l'<Rf'(5iK ^gif^Tsii^ST petitionere submits that the objectlon Qrder 7 Rule 11 of C.P.C. has also been ^ind the case is pending consideration >ions Judge, Durg. the parties dismissed the application [cation fordismissal of ttie plaint cari be |There js no jurisdictional error or gross Assuch.theimpugnedorderpassed by Judge, Durg does hot call for any Wicle 227 ofthe Constitution of India. .Idismissed. Noj4228 of 2005,1.A. 9088 of 2005 and I.A. tlf. ___- Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge ^P/FS/2005-20,000 ^ ^ 1[^