CW 14749/09 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.14749/2009 Satyam Narain Vaishnav Versus RCSAT & Ors Date of Order : 14/12/09 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. PS Sharma, for petitioner Petitioner while presently working as Upper Division Clerk and having remained posted in district Ajmer from the date of induction in service since September, 1982, has been transferred by State Government in exercise of powers U/s 89(8)(ii) of Rajasthan Panchayatiraj Act, 1994 from Panchayat Samiti Bhinai (Ajmer) to Shiv (Barmer) vide order dt.11/02/09 which was assailed in Appeal- 1409/2009, but it was rejected vide order dt. 12/11/2009. Sole contention raised by Counsel for petitioner is that there could hardly bee any justification for transferring the petitioner from Ajmer to Barmer, which is situated at a distance of 700 kms, and it cannot be said to be in the interest of administration. As per petitioner's own saying, since September, 1982, he remained posted in district Ajmer and has now been transferred for the first time outside district under CW 14749/09 //2// orders of State Government. Transfer is an incidence of service, and the petitioner cannot claim a lien to continue within district Ajmer for all times to come. It is not the case of petitioner that the authority which has passed the order impugned is biased or there is any violation of statutory rules and in absence whereof, the authority has taken decision to transfer the petitioner in exercise of its powers under Rajasthan Panchayatiraj Act in the interest of administration. It does not call for interference. This Court finds no manifest error being committed by the Tribunal warranting interference. Consequently, writ petition is devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p.2/ 14749CW09Dec14-DsTrns.doc