IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No. 595 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 30, 2009 Ashok Kumar …Appellant Versus State of Haryana …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: for Mr. Rakesh Nagpal, Advocate, for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. This appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent challenges order dated 20.7.2000 passed by the learned Single Judge in RFA Nos. 212 of 1995 [main judgment passed in RFA No. 383 of 1998 (Kashmiri Lal and another v. State of Haryana and another) decided on 20.7.2000]. In view of amendment in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by way of incorporation of Section 100A, no intra-court appeal from the date of said amendment, would be maintainable. The provision of Section 100A CPC has been interpreted by a Full Bench of this Court in the case of Parshotam Dass v. State of Haryana, 2003 (2) PLR 816 (F.B.). Even otherwise, there is huge delay of 3033 days in filing the instant appeal. The appeal is not maintainable. Dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (JASWANT SINGH) November 30, 2009 JUDGE Pkapoor