IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 4553 of 2011 Decided on: July 14, 2011. Sagru Ram. Versus State of H.P. & anr. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K.Bawa, AG, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:- “(i). That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to give daily wager’s status to the petitioner w.e.f. 1.1.2006 since he was engaged w.e.f. 1.1.1996 as Part Time Forest Worker and as per part time policy of the State Government, the petitioner was entitled to get the daily wager status as and when he completed 10 years’ service but he was given the same on a later date i.e. in the year 2009.” 2. According to the petitioner, in terms of the policy prevailing in the State, after 10 years of part time service, he is entitled to conferment of daily waged status and after eight years of such service with continuity of 240 days in each calendar year, he is to be regularized in service. There cannot be any dispute in principle on the above submission. However, the facts are to be verified. The second respondent shall look into the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law and in terms of the policy on regularization, as referred to above. This shall be done within a period of four months from the date of submission a copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition. It is made clear that in the event of the petitioner being conferred the daily waged status on completion of 10 years part time service, he shall not be entitled to any conferment. However, such conferment of daily waged service shall be taken into consideration for the purpose of 2 regularization. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the second respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 14th July, 2011. (Justice V.K. Sharma), (vs) Judge.