IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 13748 of 2007 Between: B.Sambaiah S/o.Sri Ramulu R/o.3-98/1, 22nd WArd, IIIrd Lane Srinagar, Bapatla, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 Bapatla Municipality, Bapatla, Guntur District rep. by its Commissioner. 3 Ambaraju Ramanuja Swamy S/o.Suryanarayana 2nd Lane, vijayalakshmipuram, Bapatla, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent 2 in not taking steps to stop the construction taken up by respondent 3 at the site adjacent on the Western side of the petitioner house 3-98/1, 22nd Ward, III Lane Srinagar, Bapatla, in violation of the sanctioned plan as is illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to remove the structures which have come up illegally on the Western side of the petitioner's house after declaring that the construction on the Western side of the petitioner's house cannot be taken up contrary to the approved plan and the building regulations and set back rules and pass such order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.S.MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. Counsel for Respondent No.2 : SRI S.NAGESWARA REDDY Counsel for Respondent No.3: SRI C.S.N. Raju The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13748 of 2007 ORDER: Sri Ram Babu, learned counsel representing Sri K.S.Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. __________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY,J 28.04.2009 v v