"9|)!)9sne3 eApqe sq} ui p9ie}s sy siNaaNOdsaa 3Hi do syyinoiiyvd •9|}!} 8Sn.e3 sq} ui eAoqe peuoiiusujsv syaNoij.iiad^HiJosyvTnou.yVci •z •l. NO!lli3d=IHljOS11V13a •puisig '^eBLuejiei-ig :;':' <'^; . '£ (•9-0)^ .indBJssg - louisia 'iusu.ipedaa aie^|9/v\ leqHj.. : 'jeuojssiuiiuoQ tue}sissv 941 'g (•Q'Q^ndie^'AeieflueiAl'UEMeqg •S'X'a- 'iueujyedaa ej&liaAA |eq!Ji . ^^ 'A.,iei9J39S;4Bnojqi'iueLU)jedaa 8jej|8fiA..|equi'ijje6si})BL|U3jo9)e:)s 'i. snsy3A ..^> .-•"V ^^ . ,;, :. : (qjeBsifleqqo) jndefig - pyisiQ 'LiJsBLuejieqg 'jeoyjo uoiieonpg. >l;)0|a..^uBis!ssv p soy^o ui psqseue 'ejniOuieg '|OOL|OS AjeLUUd 'jeqoeei )ue}Sjss9.se peisod 'sjeeA 91? inoqe peBv ,'LueAL|S9^9A p4S 9iB1 o/S ^eGeseABa •» ^^y--^ ..••'"/^^^•"'/l'^ ^y' ^"'" y3N011113d , :.a3iiv^i 3Hi NI aoiisnroa oiyaaao yo:NQiJ.33Hia3~iaviinsvao/QNVNOiiiaiHoyc)'sn]AivaNViAi .; iyvaoi.l.yMd03yniVN3HiN]jja/v\vjo30Nvnssiyo^ VIQNI ^Q NOIinillSNQO 3H1 JOlZZ/9Z£310LLav^3GNnN0lili3d iiaM aauwiaoiAyas ®t6U5?'60QZ :)0 c^92 •ON (S) NOflliSd iiyAA sviiaiVHavosiuvHHo jo lynoo HOIH 3HiNi '-Q^\.-^'<J 1T^-aTif1~t?f.e5r1Wi'S. l''"""—'-!•'. ^...^..fi.C^.>I&.^. ;00^ •an^r -^af; (•^y.v.' an^T'wf^'iW ^rai 3H^?T sFT?Nfi' J^is, ^•/Tf^T^t"-? 'r?:T:P::r'"0 f^7' "^P ^r aiiTir -<iff,.'t ._Mr, Jusfice Pritirtker ^^ ^°? £,£.Ut.i Shri Sandeep Dubey counseljforthe petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh ThakuriDy. AG with Ms. Sunita Jaln PL for the respondents/State. 1 Challenge in thls petition isj to $he order dated 30.6.2009 jpassed by respondent 'No.1 by j<vhich the petitioner has been |transferred from the office of Biock] Educatlon Officer, Bhairamgarh |District Bijapur to Primary Schosjsl Surdongar, Keshkal, Districf iBastar. { Contention of the counse! | for the petitioner is that the li Ipefitioner'an .^assistant teacher qnd fhe seniority of the assistant Seachers is maintained district wis4. He r'urther submits that if the Ipetitioner is forced to go snd joifi in the transferred place, his jseniority would be adversely affscte^i. Counsel for the responder^ts/State submits that let ths betitioner make a sultable repi'esentation to the authorities ;oncerned which would be decided -oposition of the State counsei, cAunsel for the petitioner showed |iis agreement. However, he prays representation of the petitioner .boncerned. in accordance with law. To this for an interim profection fi!! the js decided by the authorities ir'^yt^iTT^--—E;S/95—i s ;'2(;()^-—'..Ql?.Oi)t c^ .V- an^i ^i h-f'M WIt Sff^S shW^> JKl. '731 "41'41c1'4, 8><il<H'l<o, F°«11'ylj,< —2,— *<i*ipii ai*ii<»»"""""""""""""""""""""""""W[^200 311^?T'<ra^T ('yf3^t:T) '|R<IIW ^lfei W^T Accordingly, the peti' the petitioner makes a ref /ithin a period of 10 days order, the authorities coni further period of three weet order impugned sha!i be ta pstitioner. chi<i[d<il-ri HH<-ff ^f fs^ <r<n-^i< ^Tsffinan^T ion is disposed ofwith a direction that if resentation to the authorities concerned from the date of receipt of copy of this serned shali decide the same within a s from the date of its receipt. Tiil then the pt in abeyance so far as it relates to the Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge —