BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH FORE THE HON’ PETITIONER AT BILASPUR {M .' x“ L/ Q aglvm @ mm 3mm, W.P. 1C) No. Sag} [2010 Santosh Kumar Agrawal S/ot Late Prabhu Déyal Agrawal, aged about 53 years, R/o. Ganjpara, Indira Gandhi Ward No. 20, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1., f The State of Chhattisgarh, through the V Urban RESPONDENTS Secretary, Administration Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) W DER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF lNDiA. RIT PETITION UN 2f Municipal Corporation Raipur, through it’s Commissioner, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Raipur Development Authority, through it’s Chief Executive Officer, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4i Town and Country Pianning Department, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) gIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR KRIT PETITION (C) No. 4861 of2010 PETITIONER : Santosh Kumar Agrawal. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION (C) No. 4862 of2010 PETITIONER : Smt. Vidya Devi Megham'. , VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2 ‘ B: Ha’ble Shri Present: Shri A.K.Prasad, Advocate for the petitioner’ 26 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA tish K. A nihotri Shrl M.P.S.Bhat1'a, Deputy Government Advocate for the Advocate Shri H.B.Agrawal, for the respondent Senior Advocate No. 2. with Ms. Pragya ‘ Singh,’ State/respondent No. I and 4. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Advocate for the respondent No. 3t ORDER ORAL (Passed on 16 day of September, 2010) shall be done in accordance with law. In view of foregoing, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. Accordingly, both the writ petitions are dismissed. /r<t/$;gnih°“i Sat! Amit Judge \ S n Sa J. /