IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 15TH MARCH 2010 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 8359 of 2010(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.JANARDHANAN NAIR, TILAK, SMARA 94, SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.ASP.KURUP SRI.SADCHITH.P.KURUP RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. TRIVANDRUM CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD. NO.1959, M.G.ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP. BY THE GENERAL MANAGER IN CHARGE. 2. THE CO-OPERATIVE ARBITRATION COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, TRIVANDRUM CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD. NO.1959, M.G.ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT. BY GP K C SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO. 8359 OF 2010 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner was an employee of the first respondent, Bank. He had approached this court by filing O.P.380 of 2003, when his service benefits were denied to him without any justification. As per Ext.P1 judgment, the said writ petition was allowed and a Writ Appeal filed against the said judgment, dismissed. According to the petitioner, out of animosity for having approached this court, he was victimised and was dismissed from service, on charges of misappropriation. The petitioner had challenged his dismissal before the Arbitration Court through Ext.P5 proceedings. The complaint of the petitioner is that no final orders have been passed on Ext.P5 till date. Though as per an interim order, reinstatement of the petitioner had been granted, the same was set aside by this court by Ext.P8 judgment. The first respondent has thereafter filed written statement also but the matter has not progressed thereafter. The petitioner therefore seeks appropriate directions for an early disposal of the said case. Wpc 8359/2010 2 2. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider ARC 150 of 2009, in accordance with law, and to finally dispose of the same, as expeditiously as possible, and at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE lgk