IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27095 of 2011 1. Chando Mahto son of Late Budhan Mahto 2. Sulekha Devi W/o Chando Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 23.8.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 498A, 379, 341, 323, 504/34 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the facts of the case that the allegations against the petitioners, who are parents-in-law of the victim, that they refused to marry the younger son with the complainant,who was 10 years younger to her,let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Nalanda at Bihar Sharif in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No.115 of 2011,subject to the conditions (i)That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii)That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for - 2 - charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )