IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.VENKATESWARA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 20184 of 2005 Dated: 5th October 2005. Between: D.Balaji ..... PETITIONER AND The Inspector ofPolice, Ramachandrapuram Police Station, Medak District and others .....RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.VENKATESWARA REDDY W.P.NO.20184 OF 2005 ORAL ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice M.Venkateswara Reddy) This taken up writ petition originates from a fax message dated 6th September 2005 given by the petitioner herein alleging that one V.Digambara Reddy, worker of B.H.E.L., and another abused her and her family members in the name of her caste (Scheduled Tribe); that written complaints dated 16th and 17th August 2005 were given by her to the Inspector of Police, Ramachandrapuram Police Station; that the said complaints were registered as Crime Nos. 284 of 2005 of the said Police Station; and that the police are not taking any action, leave alone arresting the accused. It is also further alleged that the Hon’ble Sri Justice Dr.K. Punnaiah, Chairman, A.P. S.C. & S.T. Commission, also addressed a letter t the Superintendent of Police. Despite it, the police are not taking any action and on the other hand they are enabling the accused to manage the witnesses. The Government Pleader for Home took notice in the matter and a counter is filed into Court by the 2nd respondent (Sub Divisional Police Officer, Ramachandrapuram Police Station). It discloses that the police examined as many as nine witnesses so far and the investigation reveals that both the complainant and the accused reside in the same block and there is a dispute between them relating to throwing of waste material and water on the ground floor in front of the house of the accused; that the investigation is under progress and some more witnesses have to be examined and an appropriate report will be filed before the Court concerned on the completion of the investigation. As the counter discloses that there are some disputes between the complainant and the accused and the investigation is still in progress, we feel that no further steps are necessary in this writ petition and the same as well can be left to law, which will take its own course. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed at the stage of admission. ---------------------- J.Chelameswar, J -------------------------------- M.Venkateswara Reddy, J 5th October 2005 mrk