IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.: 656 of 2006. Decided on: 17.03.2009. Prem Prakash Gupta. … Petitioner. Versus The State of H.P. and Other. … Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?No. For the petitioner: Mr. K.D. Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. Advocate General and Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): With the consent of the parties, Annexure P.9, dated 30.11.1994 and Annexure P.11, dated 30.6.2006 are quashed and set aside. However, the liberty is reserved to the respondents to start fresh proceedings against the petitioner under the provision of Himachal Pradesh Public premises (Eviction -2- of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971, from the stage of issuance of notice by specifying the grounds as per Section 4 of the Act. With these observations made here-in-above, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Dasti Copy, on usual terms. March 17, 2009. (Rajiv Sharma) (rkv). Judge.