Crl.M.C. 7/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Heard Mr. BM Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Al so heard Mr. BB Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. This is an application for suspension of execution of sentence, stay of realization of fine and for granting bail to the petitioner pending disposal of Criminal Revision being Crl. Revn. No.493/2010. Mr. Choudhury submits that sentence imposed in this case is simple impri sonment (S.I. for short) for 3 months under Section 498(A) IPC and to pay fine o f Rs.1000/-. But there is no likelihood that the connected revision petition wil l be heard expeditiously. The learned counsel further submits that the petitione r was all along on bail during the pendency of the case before the trial Court a nd he never misused the liberty so granted to him. The learned counsel, therefor e, prays for suspension of execution of sentence and to allow the petitioner to go on bail during pendency of the revision petition. In view of the materials available on record and also considering the su bmission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the execution of senten ce as well as realization of fine as mentioned hereinabove passed by the learned trial Court in GR (BLP) Case No.222/2005 and affirmed by the learned Sessions J udge, Dhubri in Criminal Appeal No.4(2)/2008 vide judgment and order dated 21.09 .2010, shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal revision. The applicant, namely, Sri Suryya Kanta Nath, is allowed to go on fresh bail, in GR (BLP) Case No.222/2005 on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Rupe es Five Thousand) only with two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfac tion of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhubri. With the aforesaid direction, this miscellaneous application stands allo wed and disposed of.