IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO. 31761 OF 2011 Between: S.A Gaffar … Petitioner V/s. Nalgonda District Co-operative Central Bank, Represented by its Chief Executive Officer, Nalgonda & Ors. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri GK Nizamuddin Counsel for the Respondents : GP for Co-operation The Court made the following: (Order follows next page) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO. 31761 OF 2011 O R D E R : This writ petition is ﬁled seeking issuance of mandamus, declaring the action of the third respondent in not taking any action on the petitioner’s representation dated 18-8- 2011 inspite of repeated visits, is illegal, arbitrary and consequently to direct the third respondent to complete the enquiry as expeditiously as possible and to grant such other suitable relief as this court may deem ﬁt and proper in the circumstances of the case. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as Secretary in the fourth respondent society since the year 1984 and later the designation of Secretary is called as Chief Executive Oﬃcer. While so, basing on a report published in Saakshi Telugu daily news paper dated 14-10-2009 he was placed under suspension vide Order in RC.No. Estt/Spl.Catt of Asst.F.26/2009- 10 dated 19-10-2009 issued by the ﬁrst respondent on the allegation that he incurred heavy expenditure towards establishment charges and contingent charges exceeding the limits. It is stated that the order of suspension has been passed contrary to the rules, which does not disclose that it is passed pending enquiry and so far no charge sheet has been furnished and no subsistence allowance was paid. Therefore, he ﬁled a representation on 18-8-2011 before the third respondent contending that the fourth respondent had issued no objection certiﬁcate dated 01-4-2010 stating that the petitioner was working as CEO in the fourth respondent society and that there was no misappropriation has been occurred and no misplacing of record and accordingly no due certificate was issued. 3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that enquiry has been initiated against the petitioner by proceedings dated 19-10-2009 whereby he was placed under suspension and the said enquiry is not concluded and the petitioner is not paid subsistence allowance. In these circumstances, without going into merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, as hereunder: The third respondent is directed to complete the enquiry which was initiated against the petitioner pursuant to the proceedings dated 19-10-2009 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and further the fourth respondent is directed to pay the petitioner his subsistence allowance during the pendency of the suspension period, if he is other wise, eligible for such beneﬁt as per bye laws of the society and in accordance with law. ________________________ JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH 02-12-2011 I s L THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO. 31761 OF 2011 CIRCULATION No. Date:02-12-2011 Court Master: I s L Computer No. 43 P