HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.14702 of 2010 Date : 8-12-2010 Between : Telangana Non-Gazetted Officers Colony Welfare Association, Ranga Reddy District Represented by its President Ganji Venkateshwarlu and others .. Petitioners and The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents Counsel for petitioners : Sri Jalli Kanakaih Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue Counsel for respondent Nos.3, 4 & 5 : G.P. for Co-operation Counsel for respondent Nos.7 & 8 : Sri R.N. Hemendranth Reddy The court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.1 to 5 in not initiating action against respondent No.8 in pursuance of representation dated 19-9-2008 of petitioner No.1 as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioners sought for a consequential direction to respondent Nos.1 to 5 to prevent respondent No.8 from alienating or dealing in any manner with the land admeasuring Ac.160-29 guntas in Sy.Nos.35 and 36, Gopanapalle village, Ranga Reddy District. Sri Jalli Kankaiah, learned counsel for the petitioners, invited my attention to various allegations, contained in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, made against respondent Nos.7 and 8 in the allotment of house sites. The prime grievance of the petitioners is that while the said respondents have not allotted the house sites to the genuinely eligible members, they have allotted the plots to persons who are ineligible for such allotment. The petitioners placed reliance on communication dated 22-2-2010 obtained by them under Right to Information Act, 2005 wherein the names of as many as five persons were mentioned as not being employed in the office of the Joint Disbursing Officer of the Treasury Department. In my opinion, when certain allegations of commissions and omissions are brought to the notice of respondent No.1, in the matter of allotment of house sites, it is incumbent upon it to examine and take remedial steps if it finds truth in such allegations. Non-disposal of the petitioners’ representation dated 19-9-2008 cannot therefore be appreciated. Respondent No.1 is accordingly directed to consider the representation of the petitioners and take appropriate action if it is satisfied that any irregularities were committed in the matter of allotment of plots by respondent Nos.7 and 8, in accordance with law after notice to respondent Nos.7 and 8. Needless to observe that respondent No.1 will act expeditiously in this regard. Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP Nos.18515/2010 and 18516/2010 are disposed of as infructuous. ____________________ C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy.,J Date : 8-12-2010 AM