IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.20372 of 2006 Between: Smt.L.Madhavi Latha W/o.M.Sudhakar Babu Junior Lecturer in Zoology, A.P. Social Welfare Residential College for Boys, Gandi, Chakrayapet Mandal, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Social Welfare (Q1) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Secretary, A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutional Society, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 3 The Principal, A.P. Social Welfare Residential School for Boys, Gandi, Chakrayapet Mandal, Kadapa District. 4 Harinatha Reddy, Junior Lecturer in Zoology, A.P. Social Welfare Residential College for Girls, Chinnachowk, Kadapa City & District. 5 The Principal, A.P. Social Welfare Residential School for Girls, Chinnachowk, Kadapa City & District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings in Rc.No.C1/6945/2006, dated 25.9.2006 issued by the 2nd respondent herein as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the Aims and Objects of the Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society and also to the Service Rules apart from being violative of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 19 & 21 of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.R.REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE MR. MOOLA VIJAYA BHASKAR MR. M. JAYARAM REDDY The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.20372 OF 2006 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _________​__________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 6th November, 2008. IBL