a C— IN 1HZ itS C hi? U? isATFATA A AT BAflLORS DAT3D This THS 4t’ mi 0? JJNE 1998 Tig &N’LE KR. JUsT.tCJ TIWTh .TilAkUR d1 rET1TLiN NU.48992 K. lint an the iwny, Ksna4n 0 Iartner, V/c. 8rin vi a IrQfltc, o•45, 5t mock, £sejina ‘er, bsm ‘al,n a 5 60 0 ). petitioners (by ri C.u. aunder, Advocate) 1. The Commeraini. Thx Uftcer, Ill Circi., Asngalore. 2. e * i dar, 4t i , flrddhs Li Hidsn ne, itoze a 560 (Dy ri s,I.bhiayo4 a’an, HCP) . a S —s 21— This dflt Petition filed V 226 of thE Jon stitition of India prayi’i; to juagh Anne— mire ‘a’ dt.t.%2.91 bearing No Pa.—Z—4/8tl 8141/90-9’ ad *nnezure-C iued to R2 by Re and etc. this nit vetition coming n for hearing tnis day, tile Cokrt made the followings— LtP_L_ A first appeal preferred ainst an Assess ment order made aider the Karnataka 3ale Tax A at, having baled, tne petitioner appears to have filed a second appeal before the aarrataka Appellate fl’ioinal. Bi’ice the A,pellate Tribinal does not have any power to grant an interim order of stay, the etatione hag come p ith the present writ petition &vflenging the re— eove n tee ie aed n tha a i tne sssesnent rde ..j tie A3thoritaes below. 2 ‘ a. i • ea nbha fth petitioner. Kr. bhiVayo4 Swamy, overnment Pleader poin o t that tn app 3. was tied as early ag in the year 1992 arid that tie . . 3 : 3 :— same must in all likelihood have been disoosed of by the tribunal by now, It is submitted that even if Dy any chance, tIe appeal was still pending, the same could be Lirected to be di posed of expeditiously and the interim order granted by this court contInued in the meantime, 2, In the circumstances, nd keeping in view the submission made at that bar, I direct that Sales Tax appeals No,46146Wg1 filed by the petitioner before the Karnataka Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal shall bediposed of within 3 months fron. toda:y 1+ notàtrAady disposed of, interim order grsnted by this court sh.all also contlnue in.. the meantime, but only for a. period of 3 months, No costs. (IC mpk/ hba/