1 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C.A.W.No.2399 of 2009 in Writ Petition No. 4096 of 2009 (D) (Atul Shrihari Ghonmode .vs. Chief Executive Officer, Chandrapur and another) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: D.D.Sinha and F. M. Reis, JJ. Date : 23/11/2009. Heard Mr. Ramesh Darda, Adv. for applicant and Mr.N.W.Almelkar, Adv. for respondents. Civil Application No.2399 of 2009 is moved by petitioner/applicant for re-calling of the order dt. 20.10.2009 passed by the learned Vacation Judge. Counsel for petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was neither appointed as a Shikshan Sewak nor he discharged duty as a Shikshan Sewak. It is submitted that the petitioner was appointed as a teacher vide order dt. 8.7.2006 issued by Zilla Parishad, Chandrapur in a secondary school and was never appointed as Shikshan Sevak; however, in the order passed by this Court, it has been wrongly observed that the petitioner is a Shikshan Sewak and has an 2 . alternate remedy before the Grievance Committee and in view of the alternate remedy, the petition came to be disposed as ‘withdrawn’ with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Grievance Committee. It is, therefore, prayed that the impugned order may be revoked and Writ Petition No. 4096 of 2009 may be restored to the file of this Court. Counsel for respondents does not dispute this aspect. In the backdrop of the above referred undisputed facts, it appears that the petitioner was not appointed as a Shikshan Sewak by the Zilla Parishad and was appointed as a teacher in the Secondary school run by Zilla Parishad. In that view of the matter, the impugned order dt.20.10.2009 is re-called and Writ Petition Nos. 4096 of 2009 is restored to the file of this Court. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE jais