IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13378 of 2010 SAIRA KHATOON WIFE OF LATE SK. SIKANDER RESIDENT OF MOHALLA CHOUDHARY MOHALLA P.S. SADAR, DISTRICT- KATIHAR Versus 1. THE SECRETARY,DEPARTMENT ELECTRICITY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, BHAGALPUR 3. THE GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, SAHARSA 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, KISHANGANJ, DISTRICT- KISHANGANJ 5. THE ELECTRICAL SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY CIRCLE, PURNEA 6. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, KISHANGANJ, DISTRICT- KISHANGANJ 7. THE TREASURY OFFICER, KISHANGANJ, DISTRICT- KISHANGANJ 8. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 2 17.08.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the respondent-Board. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon the superannuation of her husband on 31st July, 2007 from the post of Junior Engineer while working in the office of the respondent no.4, no retiral dues were sanctioned and paid despite representation by her husband who subsequently died on account of illness on 3rd of May, 2009. Petitioner also represented her grievance, but no retiral dues has been sanctioned and paid. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Board submits that the representation of the petitioner or her husband is not clear with regard to the claims. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for payment of the retiral dues of her husband as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.3 with copy to the respondent nos. 2 & 4. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable may also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)