7 $-30 m THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI I.A. 4265/2010 IN CS (OS) 2304/2009 AUTODESK, INC & ANR. . I a ^ t-. Through: Mr. Ankush Mahajan, Advocate. Plaintiffs versus MEHUL HANSOTl & ORS. Through: Mr. Ashim Aggarwal and Mr. Chetan Gupta, Advocates. Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT «/ /o ORDER 07.04.2010 I.A. No.4265/2010 (0-23, R-3 CPC) Thj-ough this application, the parties request the Court to record the compromise, terms of which are set out in paragraph 2 (a) to 2 (i) of the application. The application is supported by the affidavit of the piaintifFs constituted attorney as well as the affidavit of the representatives of defendant Nos.2-4. Having considered the submissions and materials on record, the Court is of the opinion that interest of justice require that the application should be allowed. I.A. No.4265/2010 is allowed. CS fOSl 2304/2009 The plaintiffs submit that the first defendant may be deleted from the array of Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified \ parties. Ordered aeeordingly. In view of the order made today in LA. No.4265/2010, CS (OS) 2304/2009 has to be decreed in terms of the said application. Learned counsel for the defendants has handed over a demand draft of Rs.57,55,895.20 (Rs. Fift>' Seven Lakh, Fifty Five Thousand, Eight Flundred Ninety Five and Paise Twenty only) in terms of paragraph 2 (b) of LA. No.4265/2010. Let a decree in terms of paragraph 2 (a) to 2 (i) of the application be drawn subject to the plaintiffs depositing the deficient amount constituting difference between the amount of the Court fee paid and the aggregate of amounts payable under paragraphs 2 (b) & 2 (c) of the application. CS (OS) 2304/2009 is decreed in the above terms. S. RAVINDllA BHAT, J APRIL 07, 2010 /vd/