District Durg (C.G.). Piaintiif HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION i227} Ii’o. 64‘75i20i1 PETITIONER: Ashok Kumar Jain, S/o Gendmal Defendant Jain, aged about 47 years, v Occupation Busincss, R/ o Dondilohaxa, Tahsil Dondilohara, District Durg (C.G.). Versus RESFON‘DENN 1. Nagar Panchayat Dondilohara, Defendant Through Chief Municipal 0E1cer, Nagar Panchayat Dondilohara, 2. Fattelal Jain, S/o Late Ramadin Jain, Caste Jain, aged about 65 .years, through Ammukhatiyar Suresh Knmar Jain, S/o Shri Fattelal Jain, Occupation BuSiness, R/ o Dondilohara, Tahsil Dondilohara, District Durg (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Presentz— Ms. Renu Kochar, Advocate for the petitioner. Respondents not noticed. ORDER (Passed on 02} 1 11301 1) 1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India petitioner has challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 10/ 10/2011 passed by Civil Judge Class 2, Dondilohala District Durg C.G. in civil suit No. 8A] 11 whereby application for dismissal of suit filed under Order 7 Rule 1 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (in short ‘the Code’) by petitioner has been dismissed. a r 2. Ms. Renu Kochar, Advocate for the petitioner is heard. 3. Order inipugned, copy of the plaint and copy of the application perused. As per plaint allegation respondent No. 2 has tiled suit for permanent injunction therefore it was necessary for him to value suit property on the basis of market value. Consequently, by dismissing application Eed under Order 7 Rule 1 1 of the Code trial Court has not committed any illegality requiring any interference in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction. Consequently, petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. / »sd/- ,ruw T.P. Sharma/ i Judge /‘