^ SlBis3@ B€r8©h IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (227) No.^!^ / 2009 PETITIONER Defendant ^•- . ^>.^l€^...-' .^^f^""" .^' ^"\.^<"" 1. 2. •e^" 3. 4^; <" 6. Rupsai, aged about 70 years S/o , Dugpal Cherwa Shankar, aged about 55 years S/o Dharmjit Cherwa Santlal, aged about 50 years S/o Dharmjit Cherwa Budhulal, aged about 65 years S/o Karna Cherwa Sudhdu, aged about 40 years S/o Karna Cherwa Sukhanandan, aged about 50 years S/o Charka Cherwa All the Petitioner are Kastkar, R/o village Tarabahra, Tahsil Manendragarh, Distt.Koriya (C.G.) RESPONDENTS ^^ / ^ ^ VERSUS l^ Jagat S/o SonSai Cherwa aged about 23 years, Kastkar t/< ^ 2.^.^ 'Bipaiya Widpw/o'SonpatsajJ^h^rwa agj^drabout 45 yej ^^t,.\&\ (>rA Both respondent are R/o village je^A ^s^^^ Tarabahra, Tahsil Manendragarh, ^u^ ^\^ 0> Distt.Koriya (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^?y^%,. ^<"^ ^l^i'^l^IW l^?^i^i^?N? r^< 'HfWiT »*18<?i 7o£[^l^H'4, ^Ti1'y<i<o, r®i<ni'y*i< ^...M&..C^2.2^.^/'9 'arr^r^^ .(^?^^) ^N^N-wi^f <? fe^ ^^R ^•atfeH^I^T SB: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTIC 5 N.K. AGARWAL Shri Par^g Kotecha, A€ 1. vcx?ate, for the petitloner. Shri Paakaj Shrlvasta^a, Advocate, for the respondexit No. Shri Kotecha submits |that respondent No. 2 has already died aud he has wrongly be^n arrayed as party in this petition. He oraUy prays that he may| be permitted to delete fhe name of respoudent No« 2 from the ar^ay ofpespondent. Prayer is allowed. The [petitioner is permitted to delete the nazne of rcspondent no. 2 |from tlie array of tiie respondent dining fhe coiii^e offhe day, Heard leanied couiisel j Learaed counsel for br tibie parties. |fhe petitioner subimts that this petition may be disposed of^yifh the direction to fhe trisl Court that the trial Court shaUI consequential ainendinent in ofthe amendnient niade in thl Court shall decide the matteil ,1. may also be aUowed aad fh permit the petitioner to xaake his written stateinent in pursuaiice p plaint by the plaiatiffand fhe tdal fhereafter ia accordance with law, He also prays that his appUca|don under Order 8 Rule 5 ofC,P.C< e documeiit fUed along with that application be taken on recor^, to which, leaoied counsel for the respondent has no objection, ^ra^i ^^N g^n^r<^Rt^t^—FS/95—i 1 /2008—1,00,000. ^^. •:9Sy% j '•^^-^ XI-HC—78' 3T!^7^l1^W ?T^T 3??^T^^W ^^r ^t|^|d4, ^Tft^FT^, [Gi<ni^ll< ^.""^I^.l>^^7^/^ WH^W(b*il<*» ^ 200 3T!^T'^W(T^3^l?) I^TW^T3^T Submission is fair. Thk Coiirt shall permit fhe ^ consequential ainendment, if| Court below azid thereafter accordaiice witli law. It is alst aUow the petitioner to file| September, 2005 passed by 13-A-6(A)/03-04. Wifh fhe above observal srefore, it is directed that fhe trial ititioner to file application for ifjany, ifprefered wiffain 7 days iu the fhe Court shall decide fhe suit m directed that the tdal Coiul shall document ie. order dated 30th fhe Tehsildar ia Revenue Case No. ^ons, the petition is dlsposed of. ^FlfeT^? 'RTE^ff ^f feT^ i^^K' -^ <3:i^RSlT^T Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge