‘ g IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR lC.G.) $44 WRIT PETITIo§yo.3¢&3€’ [2006 5%‘ai: a PETITIONER LR. Chandrakar, S/o. Late Shri P.N. Chandrakar, Aged about 58 years, Occupation — Service, Presently working as Asst. Engineer, Water Resource Department, Sub Division- Bhatgaon., District Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, x ‘Department of Water Resource, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Deputy Secretary, Department of Water Resource, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Chief Engineer; Water Resource Department, Raipur District-Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS. ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. L p x W W , W , W WW WNwwhsa. 1H 200 Wm (W) WWW mmm 133.2006 mmmm Heard Shri Ashi$h ‘Shrivastava Shri Sumesh Bajaj; Govt. Adv tioner has challenged the transfer order By the instant petition the p dated 4.7.2006 (Annexure 13-3; wher by the petitioner has been transferred from Bhatgaon, District Raipur to Kharsiya, District Raigarh, The chatlenge is primarity on the ground that the petitioner is 8 years old and he has been transferred within a short span of period i.e. withi is heart patient and she is taking treat is bad, punitive and against the trans r policy, it is held in many oases that t e transfer poiicy is not a statutory rules and .foroeable, mmn‘ww $Ww§¥1 Adv. for the petiticner. i for the State on advance copy. therefore: the same is not legally e As far as other grounds are concerned, learned oounsel for the p titioner argued that the petitioner may be allowed to make a detailed reore entation brining all these facts to the Knowledge of concerned authority or their consideration, to which learned Government Advocate for the State h s no objection. The prayer made by learned c unsel for the petitioner appears to be just, fair and reasonabie, therefore, witho t expressing any opinion on the merits of case; the petitioner is allowed to mak a detailed representation aiong with copy of this petition raising all his grievanc s to respondent No.1 within ten days from today and in turn respondent No.1 is i[ected to decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with the iaw of 3D days from the date-of receipt of epresentation. With the direction aforesaid, e petition stands disposed of. Consequentiy, M.(W.)P. No.2 361'06 also stand disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. nd pass appropriate orders within a period Sd/— L.C. Bhadoo P.T.O. 9 months. Moreover, the petitioner‘s wife . ent at Raipur, as such, this transfer order