IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3057 of 2010 1. BACHHI DEVI 2.KAUSHAL YADAV 3.MINATA DEVI 4. DEOKI YADAV 5.SATO YADAV 6. DASO YADAV & 7.MATHURA YADAV Versus STAE OF BIHAR 2 15.3.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case instituted under sections 498(A), 406, 313, 120(B)/34 of the I.P.C. and ¾ of D.P. Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that excepting petitioners no.1 and 3 there is no specific allegation of any specific overt act against the petitioners. All the petitioners are in-laws of the complainant. Petitioners no.4 to 7 are distantly related with the husband of the complainant. Petitioner no.1 is the mother-in-law and petitioner no.3 is the married sister –in- law of the complainant. Learned counsel for the State has pointed out that there is specific allegation against petitioners no.1 and 3 who had assaulted the complainant resulting into her miscarriage. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners no.2 to 7, above named, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks from today be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Lakhisarai, in Halsi P.S. Case No.87/09 subject to the condition laid down under section 438(2) of 2 Cr.P.C. So far petitioner no.1, above named, is concerned, her prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected and she must surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail, as there is specific allegation against her in the complaint petition. AnilKr.Sinha (Birendra Prasad Verma,J.)