IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH : HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH [24TH ] DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN Present: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.2594 of 2007 Between: Palakurthi Satya Hara Gowra Sankara Rao … Petitioner/JDr And: Sri Kamala General Finance, Vizianagaram … Respondent/DHr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.2594 of 2007 ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 27.04.2007 in EP No.81 of 2005 in OS No.81 of 1991 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram, wherein, the said E.P. filed by the respondent herein-DHr for realization of the decretal amount by way of arrest of the JDr, was allowed and warrant of arrest was issued against the JDr. 2. Heard both sides. Perused the record. 3. It is not disputed that the respondent herein filed suit OS No.81 of 1991 and obtained a decree on 02.12.1996 for recovery of a sum of Rs.63,190/- with interest and costs. The DHr sought to recover the said amount by seeking arrest of the JDr. According to the DHr, the JDr is having moveable and immoveable properties and is also owning cinema theatre at S.Kota. The JDr on the other hand contends that the licence Ex.B.2 for the cinema theatre is in the name of his wife and the lorry also stands in the name of his wife as can be seen from the certificate Ex.A.5 issued by the R.T.O. The decree-holder produced a certificate Ex.A.2 issued by the Grama Panchayat, S.Kota, to the effect that the JDr is having moveable and immoveable properties. The JDr on the other hand produced another certificate Ex.B1 issued by the same authority to the effect that the JDr has no properties. The executing Court has rightly observed that Exs.B.1 and A.2 are contradicting each other, though issued by the same authority and their genuineness is doubtful. Be that as it may, it is stated that in compliance with the interim order dated 07.09.2007 of this Court, the JDr has already deposited 50% of the decretal amount, it is considered that reasonable time can be granted for paying the balance amount. 4. In the circumstances, the JDr is directed to pay the balance amount due under the decree within a period of four months from the date of receipt of this order. In the event of default in making the said amount, the DHr is at liberty to pursue remedies available under law for the realization of the balance decretal amount by executing the decree. 5. In the result, the civil revision petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. ___________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J Date: 24.06.2010 bss