CWP No.11940 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CWP No.11940 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.07.2011 Sardara Singh ....Petitioner Versus The Financial Commissioner, Appeal-II, Punjab and others. ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Jatinder Singla, Advocate for the petitioners. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has filed revision petition before the Financial Commissioner, Appeal-II, Punjab, under Section 39(3) of the PEPSU Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1955 read with Section 84(1) of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, assailing the order dated 29.3.2011, 2.8.2010 and 27.8.2009 passed by the learned Commissioner, learned District Collector and learned Assistant Collector. However, till date, neither ad interim stay application was heard nor has been disposed of. He has further stated that he would be satisfied, if the CWP No.11940 of 2011 2 Financial Commissioner, Appeal-II, Punjab, is directed to decide the revision within such time as fixed by this Court. He further states that meanwhile, possession of the petitioner should not be disturbed during the pendency of the revision. Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find request of learned counsel for the petitioner genuine. Present petition is disposed of with the direction to the Financial Commissioner, Appeal-II, Punjab, to decide the revision petition filed by the petitioner Saradara Singh Vs. Amarjit Singh, within 90 days from the date certified copy of this order is placed before it, on its own merits, in accordance with law, after hearing both the parties. Meanwhile, status quo shall be maintained. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 13.07.2011 sk.