•\\ HIGH COURT Or CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE MR. T.P. SHARMA & HON'BLE MR. R. L. JHANWAR. JJ. APPLICANTS: Bf^! Cr. M.P. No.589/2009 1. Sheikh Rahmuddin, S/o Aineeruddin, aged about 59 years, R/o near Gitanjali Apartment, Bharat Chowk, BUaspur (C.G.). 2., Sheikh Nazeer, S/o Ameeruddia, ; aged about 44 years, R/o near Gitanjali Apartment, BKarat Chowk, BUaspuT (C.G.). 3. Shiekh Arman, S/o Ameeruddin, aged about 38 years, R/o near Gitanjall Apartment, Bharat Chowk, BUaspiir (C.G.). 4. SheiKh Rahimuddln, S/o Ameeruddin, aged about 47 years, R/o near Oitanjali Apartment, Bharat Chowk, BUaspur (C.O.). 5. Najma Beguin, W/o Sheikh Nazeer, aged aboyt 37 years, R/o near Gitanjali Apartment, Bharat Chowk, Bilaspiir (C.G.). 6. Afsana Begum, W/o Sheikh Arman, aged about 37 years, R/6 near Gitanjali Apartment, Bharat Chowk, BUaspur (C.G.). Versus NON-APPLICANTS: 1. 2, State of Chattisgarh, Through District Magistrate, BUaspur Wahida Begum, W/o Sheikh Karimuddtn, aged about 45 years, Apartinent, R/o near Gitanjali Bharat Chowk, BUaspur. PETmOIIUNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CMMINAL PROCEaOURB CODE. 1973. Present- Shri Adil Minh^, Advocate for fhe appllcants/ petitioners. ^ Shri U.K.S. Chandel, P.L. fbr fhe State/non-applicant No. 1. .^___^sl^l^^j^^^l^^g^^^ •I ,.«tS %,.^ '"~'szs:'ffli ORAL-ORDBR (Passedon 09/12/2009) The followine order of fhe Coiirt was passed by T.P, Sharma. J:- 1. This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Grtminal Procedure, 1973 (in short fhe Code') for modification of the order dated 30.04.09 passed by thls coiirt (fhe fhen Justice Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshinukh) tn crimmal revision Nos. 505/2008, 497/2008, 498/2008, 512/2008, 515/2008 & 516/2008 whereby criminal revisions were partly allowed and compensation was awarded to one Vahida Begum. 2. Modt&cation is prayed on the ground fhat Vsihlda Begum was not only sole owner of fhe property or sole victim but other persons i.e. petitioners were also victim of the case. It appears that only on the hnpression fhat Vahlda Begum who has lodged the report is a sufferer of the crime and victim of the ofience therefore the compensation awarded to only Valuda Begum interalia all the petitioners are entitled for fhe compensation. 3. Order sought to be inodified perused. The Para-9 of fhe order spect&cally reveal that compensation has been awarded to Vahida Begum, wife of Sheikh Karim, R/o Talapara, Bharat Chowk, Civil Llnes, BUaspur not as a person who has lodged the report but on fhe ground that her property has been destroyed. May be fhe case ttiat property E;: i. •K^ J i°) we^^;1 of fhe petitioners also have been destroyed but fhis cannot be ground for modt&cation of the order. The specific order of compensation has been passed in favour of the Vahida Begum. 4. On due consideration, we do not find any groi.ind for modiflcation of the order. Consequently, the petition is Uable to be disimssed'andjt is hereby dismissed. Sd/- , T.P, Sha®na Judge Sd/- R.L.Jhanwar Judge A-- «