IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21211 of 2010 HARENDRA YADAV . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 25/06/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a police case under Sections- 395, 394 and 120B of Indian Penal Code is that he is not named. There has been no recovery from his possession. Co-accused similarly situated has been granted bail in Cr. Misc. No.17180/10 whose prayer was rejected along with the petitioner in a common order. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj (Rohtas) in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No.197/09. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)