IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.216 OF 2005 M/s Pioneer E. Bizz Pvt.Ltd. ... Petitioner (Orig.Accused No.1) V/s M/s Zee Interactive Learning Systems Ltd. & Anr. ... Respondents Mr. Subodh Desai with V. Nirmala Gopal for petitioner Mr. S.Y.Katkade for respondent No.1 Mr. D.P.Adsule,APP for the State. Coram : V.M.Kanade, J. Dated : 08/04/2005. P.C. :- 1 I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent No.1 and APP for the State. 2 The petitioner is challenging the order of issuance of process passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate,13th Court, Dadar, Mumbai in criminal case No.88/SW/2004. The respondent has filed the affidavit in reply in which he has stated that he has filed the complaint under sections 103,104 read with sections 63 and 69 of the Copy Rights Act 2 before the said Court. He has stated that after the summons was served on the accused, the dispute between them was resolved and settled out of the court. He has stated that he has no objection if the complaint is quashed as the matter is amicably settled. In view of the affidavit of reply filed by the constituted attorney of the respondent No.1, the complaint filed by the respondent is quashed.Criminal writ petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). (V.M.Kanade,J.)