In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-24922 of 2009 (O&M) Amit Rana ..... Petitioner vs State of Haryana ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Jindal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR. He was sought to be arrested on the statement of another accused in the FIR who had merely mentioned that one Amit resident of Village Ghevra, was also one of the accused. He further submitted that there are 22 persons in the name of Amit who are residing in Village Ghevra. There is no material with the investigating agency linking the petitioner with the crime. Learned State counsel, has not been able to show from the police file as to what material was with the Investigating Officer on the basis of which the petitioner was sought to be arrested as the complete identity of the petitioner was not there, which included his name and parentage. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in my opinion, as the identity of the accused is in doubt, however, without finally opining thereon, the petitioner deserves the concession of pre-arrest bail. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner will join investigation as and when summoned by the Investigating Officer. However, in case he is sought to be arrested, he shall be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/ Investigating Officer. He shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. It is, however, made clear that in case during investigation some other material is found against the petitioner linking him with the crime, then his regular bail application shall be considered by the court below in terms of the material collected by the Investigating Agency. The petition is disposed of. 24.9.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge