1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4477 OF 2010 IN FAST NO.1793 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NOS.4479, & 4481 OF 2010 (For Delay condonation) WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4478 OF 2010 IN FAST NO.1793 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NOS.4480, & 4482 OF 2010 (For Stay ) Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : P.R. BORKAR.J. DATED : 06.04.2010 Heard Mr. S.N. Kendre, A.G.P. for the applicants. 2. These are the applications for condonation of delay of 1115 days in filing the appeals. It is stated that these appeals are directed against the common judgment and awards passed by the Civil Judge, S.D. Ahmedpur, on 04-10-2006 in group of L.A.R. Nos. 361/2001 and others. After the 2 decision on 04-10-2006, the proposal was made to the Law & Judiciary Department for sanction on 09-02-2007. So, four months were taken by the office of the District Government Pleader and thereafter, Law and Judiciary Department. After receipt of proposal dated 09-02-2007 to file appeals by the Government Pleader's office at Aurangabad, same was assigned to the Assistant Government Pleader for drafting and the appeals were drafted on 04-05-2007. It is stated that thereafter, correspondence was made and certified copies of the judgment and awards were received on 19-11-2008. Ultimately, the appeals came to be filed with delay condonation application on 21-01-2010. 3. Absolutely, there is no reason why certified copies were not enclosed with 3 sanction for appeal which was received by the office of the Government Pleader on 09-02-2007. Moreover, delay of 16 months from May 2007 to November 2008 for obtaining certified copies of the judgment and awards, typed copies, and different charts is not explained. Even, after getting everything by 19-11-2008, the appeal was not filed till 21-01-2010. Not being satisfied with the reasons given, these applications for condonation of delay are dismissed. 4. In view of the dismissal of the applications for condonation of delay, civil applications for stay, do not survive and hence disposed of accordingly. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] sut/APR10/ca4477.10