SM 1 917.wp.9878.09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9878 OF 2009 Shri. Jayawant Laxman Khadtale ....Petitioner Versus Smt. Pushpa Jayawant Khadtale ....Respondent ____________ Mr. P. N. Joshi for the Petitioner. Mr. Kuldeep Patil for the Respondent. CORAM: R. M. BORDE, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 15, 2011. P.C.: An Application was tendered by the Petitioner in a pending proceedings seeking direction from the Court to examine Smt. Pushpa Jayawant Khadtale by an expert psychiatric and the Petitioner further requested to call for the report of examination by the psychiatric. The another prayer was made to examine his son Priyadarshan by an expert Cardiac specialist and the Petitioner further requested to call for the report of examination of Priyadarshan by Cardiac specialist. 2. The proceedings before the district Court is in respect of custody of the child. There is, absolutely, no evidence placed on record indicating that the child is unwell. The Trial judge has SM 2 917.wp.9878.09 rightly rejected the application tendered by the Petitioner. So far as the prayer made in the application for referring the respondent wife to an expert psychiatric, in my opinion, the Trial Judge has rightly turned down the prayer of the Petitioner. 3. In exercise of the power conferred under article 227 of the Constitution of India, no interference is called for at this stage of the proceedings in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the matter of Shalini Shyam Shetty and another Vs. Rajendra Shankar Patil, reported in (2010) 8 Supreme Court Cases 329. 4. The Writ Petition stands rejected. (R. M. BORDE, J.)