IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1278 of 1995 1. Ram Bachan Kumhar 2.Ram Naresh Kumhar 3. Ram Suresh Kumhar 4. Ram Sipahi Kumhar 5. Jagdish Kumhar 6. Kabil Kumhar, all sons of late Ganga Kumhar, all residents of Village Ganga Walia, P.O. Basahi, P.S. Kudara, District Kaimur Bhabua. 7. Sahadei Devi wife of Ram Kishore Kumhar, resident of Village Laxmanpur, P.S. Syed Raza, District Varanasi Uttar Pradesh. 8.Bhuari Devi, wife of Yamuna Kumhar, village Bahuara, P.S. Karagahar, District-Rohtas --- Petitioners---- Petitioners ---- Appellants. Versus 1.The State of Bihar 2. The D.D.C. (Shri S.M. Ahamad Head Quarters), Bihar, Patna. 3. The D.D.C. (Shri R.D. Ojha) Rohtas (Bhabua) District Bhabua (Rohtas). 4. The Consolidation Officer, Kudara, P.O. and P.S. Kudara, District- Bhabua ---- Respondents ---- Respondents Ist Set. 5. Mulani 6. Lakha Patia 7. Man Patia, all daughters of Sheodahin Ram, residents of Village Ganga Walia, P.O. Basahi, P.S. Kudara, District-Kaimur, Bhabhua -- ----- Respondents 2nd Set. --------------- 7. 10.9.2009 Heard Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey for the appellants, and Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, learned Standing Counsel No.16. The appellants express grievance with respect to the order dated 26.7.1995, passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in C.W.J.C. No.6380 of 1994 (Ram Bachan Kumhar Vs. The State of Bihar and others), which has arisen from the proceedings under the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act. It appears that the appeal stood dismissed against respondent no.7 for non-compliance of the order dated 20.5.2009. In that view of the matter, the impugned order has become final in so far as respondent no.7 is concerned. 2 Allowing it to proceed further against the remaining respondent(s) may result in inconsistence order. The present appeal can not proceed against the remaining respondents and has become incompetent. The appeal as a whole is dismissed. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar ,J. ) ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)