IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28396 of 2010 RAKESH KUMAR, Son of Bindeshwari Yadav, Resident of Village Paharpur, P.S. Saur Bazar, District Saharsa. ………Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ………Opposite Party 02/- 01-10-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant carries allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. As it appears from the order of learned Sessions Judge that petitioner has taken a plea of dissolution of marriage by village panchayati. However, during course of argument, it is submitted that petitioner is ready and willing to resume and continue the marital life with the complainant and he is also ready to pay reasonable amount towards maintenance, so long dispute is not resolved. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, taking into consideration the gesture shown on behalf of the petitioner on the event of submitting proof of filing an application before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Purnea under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, seeking restitution of conjugal rights with an undertaking to pay a sum of Rs. 800/- per month by way of ad interim maintenance, subject to order of the competent authority on the point and begin with the payment, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks of receipt of the copy of this order, petitioner, namely, Rakesh Kumar, is directed to be released on bail on - 2 - furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection Complaint Case No. No. 2908 of 2009, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below as well as Principal Judge, Family Court, Purnea, till disposal of the case, in case of failure on two consecutive dates and on single default in payment, the liberty shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)