IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 6TH JUNE 2008 / 16TH JYAISHTA 1930 RP.No. 333 of 2008(E) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.37633/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/FIRST RESPONDENT : ----------------------------------------------------------- G.MOHANAN UNNITHAN, AMMACHI VEEDU, KAIKULANGARA, KOLLAM -12. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER& RESPONDENTS 2 TO 5: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. G.CHANDRASEKHARAN UNNITHAN, AMMACHIVEEDU, KAIKULANGARA, KOLLAM - 12. 2. G.NARAYANAN UNNITHAN, AMMACHIVEEDU, KAIKULANGARA, KOLLAM - 12. 3. K.THANKAPPAN UNNITHAN, AMMACHIVEEDU, KAIKULANGARA, KOLLAM -12. 4. RAMESH CHANDRAN UNNITHAN, AMMACHIVEEDU, KAIKULANGARA, KOLLAM -12. 5. CHELLAMMA ITTY, AMMACHIVEEDU, KAIKULANGARA, KOLLAM -12. BY ADV SRI.P.S.KRISHNA PILLAI THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J. -------------------------- R.P. NO. 333 OF 2008 --------------------- Dated this the 6thday of June, 2008 ORDER This review petition is preferred against the judgment passed by this court in WPC No.37633/07. By the said judgment, this court directed the First Addl. District Judge to consider and dispose of IA No.1724/07 in OS No.199/57, after hearing all concerned and also taking into consideration Ext.P2 objections as well. 2. The grievance of the review petitioner is that by virtue of successive orders passed by the courts it has been held clearly that only the parties to the suit can raise objections in the matter. I am informed that so far as the present IA is concerned, that has been disposed of by the court after hearing the objections and the matter has ended there. Therefore a review of the order in that direction is not necessary. But, I make it clear that if future applications are filed that may be considered and the order in the writ petition shall not be used as a sword. If the other side files objections, that also has to be considered and orders shall be passed with reference to the previous orders passed by this court in so may matters. The review petition is disposed of as above. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE vps