CR 189 of 2007. 7.4.2008 Present: Mr. G.R.Palsra, counsel for the petitioner. Mr.N.K.Sharma, counsel for the respondent. This revision petition has been preferred by the judgment debtor against the judgment and order passed by the executing Court dismissing objections filed by the judgment debtor. It is undisputed that the judgment debtor had preferred CMPMO 120 of 2007 which was disposed of by this Court on 27.9.2007 holding that the order passed by the executing Court had been filed without deciding the objection petition preferred by the judgment debtor. The parties were directed to appear before the executing Court on 11.10.2007 and direction issued that the objection petition be decided within one month by fixing short dates. It is undisputed that the order was passed on 12.10.2007. Learned counsel appearing for the objector judgment debtor submits that the learned executing Court has acted in hot haste and has not decided the objection petition in accordance with law. Parties had appeared before the Court on 11.10.2007 and on 12.10.2007 the matter has been decided and the objection petition decided in hot haste. The order shows that the learned executing Court has acted with haste and has not -2- considered objections on the points as raised by the judgment debtor. In the circumstances, this Court is left with no option but to set aside the order and to remand the matter to the executing Court for decision afresh. Parties are directed to appear before the executing Court on 30.6.2008. The learned executing Court will ensure that the matter is disposed of within two months from 30.6.2008 and that no unnecessary adjournments will be granted in the matter. Needless to say that the petition shall be disposed of in accordance with the well established principles governing the matter. Records be sent back immediately. April 7, 2008(PC). (Dev Darshan Sud), J.