^V?°l0^........- N SINK! !'R-NC>--;;-:::;'<35lS.^XC1^'' r. < o?^ L^^itSS2^: ° ^<voc" d...^i-^"-1"""""" ia IN THE HIGH COUR'FOPCHHATFISGARH ATBILASPUR PETITfONER /. WRIT PETITIOW N0. •^'^&;7~/2005 Fagurain kosle S/o late shree-Mangurani Koste about 32years, Oceup.-Assistaart TeacherR/o- Nagar palika colory Jaspur nagar, .-,Distt- Jaspur^C.G^. VERSUES ^-- RESPONDENTS '!}• ^ ^^ ^y^^y ^c^^ f^^S Or' <6iJ ^ 1. State of Chhatti^aj-it Through Secretaiy Tribal WeUare Departaient. &.K.S.Bliawan,Raipur fC.G.} (2. Assistant Conunissioner. Tribfe and WeMar®departmen-t Jasfapur,®istt.Jashpar(C.G.^ ^3. Block Education officer, Jashpur Oistt.Jashpur<C.G. } ^^ ^[^ I - y ^pyp pEm'roN u/A 226/ 227 Of THE CONSTiTUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE QF APPROPRiATE WRIT fMRECTION ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER 1111 liiii;! ~3t.^"- XI-HC-78 *#l*lrtl^qTq» V3^qs'-qi«l<?XI;U>'CTl'M<l<»,firtl-My ,^..£-..±']02............ 3^ '^2005 sii^grvfs (ycifj6i<£i) sn^CTwR'ii* crarsii^CTtbiicb v\ v.^ -f^ r^. STOISR'tifta SII^CT 05/10/2005: - @F. R, Pradhan. learned.coui Mr. Bhaskar Payashi, learned| Learnecl.CQunsel fpr the petit as Assistant Tea^her in Middle Scl- orderdatecl31,08}2005, he has-beer Khandi.BagiBha,;District Jashpur. haye perused the impugnaj appeare that the transfer ordertias policy dated 18.08.2005 with the ap| of the administration and as such it the .petitioner submits that a represej Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Well OQpsidered sympatheticai.ly and e< oondition of the-mother of the petitioi] Respondent No.2 is accordih .(Annexure P-2) 'df the petitioner 15.09.2005. sympathetically within a| ofthe copy ofthls order. In the meaf to ttie place of postlng of the petll representatfon. In view of the foregoing, the fli L<n<i{c?<I1i iiinf^ fei<sl ^Rl+c;!'; ^3il^Hsn$?T •jsel for thepetitioner. [Panel Lawyer, forthe State of Chhattisgarh. joner submits that the petitioner was working (ool, Gamharia, ViteisKhand, Jashpur. By transferred to PrimarySchool, Gurguri, Vikas orderdated 31.08.2005 (Annexure P-1). It fseen passed in compliance with the fransfer t)roval of the Minister-in-charge in the interest jeeds no interference by this Court. However, itatfon which was received in the Office of the fare Department, Jashpur on 18.09.2005 be Ispeditiously, keeping in'view^the physical ler. . igly directed to consider the representation ^hion has • been reoeivecl in his offioe on period of four weeks rrom the date of reoeipt iwhlle, status quo as It exists today, In regard ioner, be maintalned tlll the disposal ofthe 'tltlon stands dlsposed of. 1