IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3786 of 2011 Jag Lal Thakur, son of lae raj Banshi Thakaur, resident of Chainpur House, Mohalla – Punaichak, P S – Shashtri Nagar, District – Patna (retired Assistant Tourist Information Officer, Government of Bihar) Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Tourism Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Tourism Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Tourism, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Legal Remembrancer cum Secretary, Law Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. ----------- 04. 21.11.2011 Learned counsel for the State seems to be correct in his objection that Annexure-4 was passed against the petitioner way back in the year 2002, to be precise on 5.9.2002 and already implemented over the years since there is no challenge to this order at any point of time. Merely because petitioner has filed a representation in the year 2008 after some kind of order was passed in favour of some employee by the State of Jharkhand, that can not become the basis for re-opening the issue. Even in the present writ application there is not a modicum of challenge to Annexure-4. Submission of the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that cause of action for him arose after he filed a representation against non-consideration and the refusal by the respondents to act upon such a representation seems to be misplaced if not ill-founded because the origin of the cause of action is 2002 order or decision and not the 2 representation. In view of above, the writ application is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)