- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4401 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.4401 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.4401 OF 2005 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.D.N.Salvi i/b Mr.P.D.Desai for the Applicant Mr.S.V.More, A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 13,2006. : OCTOBER 13,2006. : OCTOBER 13,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates appearing for the parties. The Application is opposed by the learned Advocate appearing for one of the Respondents. After having perused the Application for condonation of delay and additional Affidavit in support of the Application, I find that there is sufficient explanation for delay. Sufficient cause is made out. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE