IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.9857 of 2005 Between: P. Devudamma W/o. Gaddaiah, Sarpanch of Amruthapuram Gram Panchayat, Sabbavaram Mandal, Sabbavaram, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Deputy Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj Department, Sabbavaram, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 2 The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Sabbavaram, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not completing the repairs work of the road from Narava to Chintagatla Agraharam in Amruthapuram Gram Panchayat as high arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to complete the work within 3 months by rectifying the defects if any in the procedure followed by the respondents, to enable the people of Amruthapuram and surrounding areas to use the road and live in pollution free atmosphere and pass such order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.T.M.K.CHAITANYA Counsel for Respondent No.1: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. Counsel for Respondent No.2: MR. M. PRABHAKARA RAO The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.9857 of 2005 ORDER: Due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 18th June, 2009. IBL