1. Sssiuii HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition(C) 5842 of 2008 PETITIONERS RESPONDENT M/s Sati Rice Mills, Balbhadra Ward, Naya Ganj, Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.), through its Proprietor Shri Sitaram Agrawal, S/o Late Banshilal Agrawal Sitaram Agrawal, S/o Late Banshilal Agrawal, aged about 74 years, Proprietor- M/s Sati Rice Mills, R/o In front of Mahasati Mandir, Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) Versus Central Bank of India, Bhatapara Branch, Tahsil and District- Raipur, Through its Branch Manager WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Advocate for the respondent. ORAL ORDER (14.03.2011) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent submits that compromise has been arrived at between the parties and the petition has now become infmctuous. Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners, in view of the statement made as above, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to file another writ petition in case cause of actibn still survives. Permission granted. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour ofthe petitioners. ^-— Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge