IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 2153 of 2009 (M/S) 1. Kewal Krishna Sarin son of Shri B.L. Sarin resident of 47-A, Naharpur, Sector-7, Rohini, New Delhi. 2. Rajeev Sarin son of Shri Kewal Krishna Sarin resident of 43, Ist Floor, Sainik Vihar, Pitampura, New Delhi through their power of attorney Fakir Ahmad Ansari son of late Shri Jangudin Ansari resident of Redapur, Chharba, Tehsil Vikasnagar, District Dehradun. ……Petitioners. Versus 1. Aliyas son of Shri Fatedeen 2. Saleem son of Shri Fatedeen Both resident of Village Chharba, Post Sahaspur, Tehsil Vikasnagar, District Dehradun. 3. M/s Tones Valley Agro Pvt. Ltd. Head Office : 309/1, Street No. 9, Rajendra Nagar, Kaulagarh Road, Dehradun through its Directors(1) Sharad Jain son of Shri Devendra Kumar Jain & (2) Smt. Anubha Rawat wife of Shri C.P. Singh Rawat. 4. Smt. Neelam Sharma wife of Shri Nand Lal Sharma, resident of Subhash Nagar, Manav Kendra, Dehradun. 5. Hashim Ali son of Shri Ibrahim, resident of Khushalpur, Tehsil Vikasnagar, District Dehradun. 2 6. Phool Singh son of Shri Devi Singh resident of Village Chharba, Post Sahaspur, Tehsil Vikasnagar, District Dehradun. 7. Amit Kumar son of Shri Prem Thakur, resident of neer Manav Kendra, Subhash Nagar, Dehradun. 8. Rajesh Rawat son of Shri D.S. Rawat resident of Ajabpur Kalan, Dehradun. ……Respondents. Sri Pawan Mishra, Advocate, for the petitioners. Date:- December 21, 2009 Hon’ble B.S. Verma J. Heard Sri Pawan Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners. By means of this writ petition the petitioners have sought writ of certiorari, calling for the records and setting aside the order dated 10.12.2009 (Annexure No. 10 to the writ petition) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vikasnagar, District Dehradun in Original Suit No. 139 of 2009, Kewal Krishna Sarin and another Vs. Aliyas and others, only to the extent of order, not granting interim injunction in favour of petitioners and also allowing the application (Paper No. 6C2) (Annexure No. 8 to the writ petition). Brief facts of the present case, according to the petitioners, are that the petitioners purchased the property from respondent no. 1-Aliyas. Before granting temporary injunction the court has issued notices to the respondents. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners have prayed that direction be given to the 3 Trial Court to decide the application for temporary injunction expeditiously. Prayer is innocuous. The Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vikasnagar, District Dehradun is directed to decide the temporary injunction application expeditiously, preferably within a period of thirty days from the date of the production of the certified copy of this order after service is effected on the respondents. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. All the pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. (B.S. Verma, J.) 21.12.2009 RMY