IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2399 OF 2008 Between: G.Venkata Ravamma and another … Petitioners And Batchu Ramachandra Rao and others … Respondents This Court made the following: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2399 OF 2008 ORDER: - Petitioner/plaintiff is in revision under Article 227 of the Constitution assailing the correctness of the order passed by IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Fast Track Court, Vijayawada in I.A.No.490 of 2007 in O.S.No.352 of 2003, dated 20.02.2008, whereby the petition filed for appointment of the earlier advocate commissioner to measure the land in survey No.97/3 of Ayodhya Nagar, Vijayawada with the assistance of Mandal Surveyor for execution of the award, has been dismissed. Plaintiff filed the suit for declaration of ownership and for recovery of possession, in which an advocate commissioner was appointed to measure the suit schedule property and note down the physical features of the land. The report of the advocate commissioner disclose that several houses have come up in the schedule property; it is so clumpsy that the measurements of each extent cannot be taken physically; and in spite of his making all attempts to execute the warrant to the possible extent, he could not affectively execute the warrant to the full extent and accordingly filed his report, which was taken on file and the petition was closed as not pressed. After closing the said earlier petition, the present I.A. is filed for appointment of the same advocate commissioner or any other advocate commissioner. The trial court after taking into consideration of the factual aspects prevalent at the site held that it is not possible to execute the warrant in view of the constructions so made and the advocate commissioner cannot be appointed to gather the evidence in his favour. The impugned order does not suffer from any illegality, warranting interference by this Court. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J December 22, 2010 lmv