// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT PRINCIPAL SEAT, JODHPUR ORDER In 1. S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Appl. No.3931/2009 {Krishan and Dharam Pal Vs. The State of Rajasthan} AND 2. S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Appl. No.3930/2009 {Dalle Singh Vs. The State of Rajasthan} Date of Order ::: 11th August, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Shri Sandeep Mehta, Counsel for petitioners in both the applications Shri Mahipal Vishnoi, PP for the State Shri S.D. Goswami, Counsel for complainant #### By the Court: Both the applications arise out of same F.I.R., therefore, they were argued and heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State and learned counsel for complainant, and perused the material/case diary made available to me during the arguments of the case. It is contended on behalf of the petitioners that the injury which is said to be dangerous to life was alleged to have been // 2 // inflicted by accused Krishan as per the F.I.R. lodged by eye-witness Satveer Singh; whereas the injured himself alleged that it was inflicted by accused Jaipal, who has not moved application for bail before this Court. However, he contended that at this stage he does not press the bail application of accused-petitioner Krishan and the same may be dismissed as such with liberty to him to file a fresh bail application after filing of charge-sheet. In view of the above, the bail application of petitioner No.1 Krishan in SB Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.3931/2009, is dismissed as not pressed at this stage with liberty as prayed for. So far as another co-accused-petitioners, namely, Dharam Pal in SB Cr. Misc. Bail Appl. No.3931/2009 and Dalle Singh in SB Cr. Misc. Bail Appl. No.3930/2009, are concerned, I find their case distinguishable, and, after considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, examining the record and the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I allow their bail applications under Section 439, Cr.P.C. Hence, it is directed that accused- petitioner No.2 Dharam Pal (Bail Application // 3 // No.3931/2009) S/o Sohan Lal, Resident of Sardarpura Bass, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh (presently lodged at Sub Jail, Bhadra) and accused-petitioner Dalle Singh S/o Ramji Lal, Resident of Sardarpura Bass, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh (presently lodged at Sub Jail Bhadra) be released on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in F.I.R. No.144/2009, registered at Police Station Bhirani, District Hanumangarh, under Sections 307, 323 and 341 of the IPC, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) together with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court for their appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. Both the bail application stands disposed of. A copy of this order be placed in connected file also. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. //Jaiman//