IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48282 of 2008 RAJEEV KUMAR @ JUNISH @ GUNISH @ GANESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 3.12.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by an order dated 9.5.2008 in Cr. Misc. No. 5212 of 2008 with an observation that the petitioner would renew his prayer for bail after remaining in jail custody for a further period of six months. The present bail application therefore, has been filed after expiry of six months from the date of earlier order dated 9.5.2008. Counsel for the petitioner would point out that apart from the observations made in the order of this Court dated 9.5.2008, the petitioner who is in custody since 14.7.2007 i.e. more than 16 months, has virtually a clean record save and except that he is also an accused in one more criminal case being Mokama P.S. Case No. 26/2006. Noticing the aforementioned submissions, this Court would direct for release of the petitioner namely Rajeev Kumar @ Junish @ Gunish @ Ganesh Kumar on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to 2 the satisfaction of Spl. Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Railway Patna Junction in connection with Mokama G.R. P.S. Case No. 24 of 2006. The Court below however would verify the aspect that the petitioner is only an accused in two cases namely the present case and the other case being Mokama P.S. Case No. 26/2006 and only after being satisfied that the petitioner is an accused in only these two cases, it would direct for release of the petitioner on bail. In view of the fact that the petitioner faces prosecution in train robbery case, one of the bailers must be a family member and the other a Government servant. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)