.p. KIuleshwar Frasad Sahu, Age about 37 years, Asstt. Teacher S/o SIui Bhagvat Das Saliu Govt. Middle School Patper, Distt. - Rajnaadgaon (C.G.) Snit. Sheela ShuMa, Age about 42 years, Asstt. Teacher W/o Shri Kaadesh Shulda Govt. PrunaTy School Rajnandgaon, Distt.- Rajnaiidgaon (C.G.) 2 State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Depaitrcient .& Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt.-Raipur (C.G.) Distt, Education Officer, Rajnaiidgaon, Distt.- Rajnaadgaon (C.G.) Block Educatiou Officer, Rajnandgaon, Distt.- Rajaaadgaon (C.G.) Shri Soinksaiit Verma, counsel for fhe petitioners. SIui Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Law}rer for the State on advan.ee copy, S15.10.200'?] ^J Heard. Leamed c&unsel for fhe petitioners subniits ttiat fhe issue involved in. the case is as to whether fhe petitioners are entifled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date ofinitial appointment or froin fhe date of coinpletion of probation period. He subinits that the issue uivolved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Admmistrative Tribimal, Jabalpur ia O.A. No.2745/89 W.P.(8)No.61S4/2007 Y.-. (Madhukaat Yadu aad 56 ofhers Vs. State of M.P. and ofhers), wherein, it was held fhat the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. fhe date of iuitial appoiatraeat. The inatter was taken up to fhe Hon'ble Supreiue Coui-t ia Specifll Leave Petition (Civil) No.6892/93. The said petition was disinissed by the Hoa'ble Supreine Court upholdiag fhe decision of tlie Tribuiial to the effect that fhe Teachers/Assistaat Teachers are entifled to regular pay scale froia the date ofinitial appouitment. LeaiTied couiisel for the petitioners furfher subiaits that this Coiirt, while considermg fh.e sarne issue iu Ram. Kuinar Saliu aud ofhers Vs. State Govt. of Chliattisgarh aad another (W.P.(S) No.813 of 2007) by order dated 12.2.2007, has grauted regular pay scale w.e.f. fhe date ofiiiitial appom.tment. Leaca.ed couiisel for fhe parties join.fly subinits fhat fhis case is squarely covered by fhe decision of fhis Coiut ia fhe case ofRam Kuinar Sahu aad aaofher (supra). In view offhat, this petition is allowed iu the same tenns. However, this order shalt be subject to alt verificatious m.ade by the State regardiiig lacts pleaded in fhe petition. vattl Sd/- Sunil KumaisSinha Jiidge