The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.12483 of 2011 Date: 9th November, 2011 Between: State Bank of India, Stressed Assets Recovery Branch, Nampally, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Asst. General Manager ..... Petitioner and 1.The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, MA and Urban Development – II Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and 4 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.M.Narender Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.1: GP for Revenue Counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 3: Mr.Ravindra Yanamandra, SC for ORR Counsel for respondent Nos.4 & 5: ----- The Court made the following : O R D E R: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside award, dated 03-05-2008, of respondent No.3, in respect of land in Survey No.585 of Dundigal Village, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. At the hearing, Sri M.Narender Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that, after filing of the Writ Petition, his client came to know that respondent No.3 has already referred the dispute under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to the competent Civil Court i.e., respondent No.5- Principal District and Sessions Judge, District Court, LB Nagar, Ranga Reddy District, and that respondent No.5 has taken the reference on file as OP.No.180 of 2011. The learned Counsel further submitted that, as his client is not shown as a party to the said reference proceedings, it has filed IA.No.1290 of 2011 seeking its impleadment therein and that the said IA is coming up for hearing on 17-11-2011. The learned Counsel, therefore, stated that the petitioner may be given liberty to pursue the said application vide reference proceedings pending before respondent No.5. In the light of the above submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of, without going into the merits of the case and with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the application filed by it in the reference proceedings referred to above. As a sequel, WPMP.No.15191 of 2011, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 9th November, 2011 LUR