1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2857/2010. Abdul Sami. VS A.D.J.No.8, Jaipur City, Jaipur & Anr. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2857/2010. Abdul Sami. VERSUS A.D.J.No.8, Jaipur City, Jaipur and Another. 26.03.2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.L.L.Gupta, for the petitioner. ***** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order dated 04.12.2009. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the facts which have been narrated by the plaintiff stand corroborated even from the fact so far as the other four brothers are concerned on the basis of the agreement in dispute the registration of the sale-deed in their favour has been made on the basis of the consideration agreed of Rs.80,00,000/- which has been mentioned in the present agreement and sale deeds of each of the other four brothers of their 1/5 share executed accordingly. There hardly appears any substance in the submission that so for as the plaintiff is concerned, the consideration agreed was not Rs.80,00,000/-, as mentioned in the disputed agreement execution of which is denied by the petitioner who seeks to rely upon another agreement of the same date with a different amount of consideration. 2 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2857/2010. Abdul Sami. VS A.D.J.No.8, Jaipur City, Jaipur & Anr. In the facts and circumstances, I find no reason to interfere in the writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.