7:r* .? :?ril ^!% ? F*i @ .^% s 3^^ ^ ^t^.^,§^ ^'iw&« ^^g^i?|~ ( f-fcro ^-—- (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.35' 8 /2QQ7 PETITIONER y^ .''•fpA-'-"" •••'' /-*'" ^M^ .--" ^t^y ^>' /:'y^-' <^'"J>' <^'' RESPONDENTS ^ ^y ^^- ^'^' ^ ^^/' y -3. 4. 'Rajendra Kumar Nag Age about44 years, AssistantTeacher, S/o Late Shri Sukhrdu Ram Nag Govt. Primary School, Eradha Block - Kanker, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS State Government of Chhattisgarh Through:- Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) District Education Officer Kanker(C.G.) Block Education Officer Kanker(C.G.) Joint Director (Treasury/Accounts) Jagdalpur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 *11*<MI a>fll9» ^sg' '<ii<iici<<, »Tf1u'is, Ricii+iy , _Lo.f.c^ 3^/07 WT 200 311^1 Dsltb (^qI^ai^dT) sn^T^irR.fi* gaiTsil^i s»itiro Subhash ~^ ^ -^ STttTWHf^a'sn^r 23.01.2007 i4dvoc<rte Mr. Ajccy Shrivastava, Mrs. Anju ^huja, Oeputy psspondents/State. tewrted With the consent of par-ties, the wr-it petition 'is heard f[ Common or-der dictated in Wl open Courf, passed separately. A. copy of this order be connected writ petitions. |ed counsel appeariry for the fnally and disposed of. fit Petition (5) No. 355/2007 in Iplaced on fhe record of the «bi<i<Fd4)-<iiTRcrfffte'^l'iRi'wii ^sri^TTSTi^r fop the petitioner(s). 'ovemment Adyocate for the Sd/- SatisUK.^ Judge P.T.O. \-r~- '<). HISH COWT OF CHHATTISSARH AT BIUtSPUR W. P.fSl No. 355 of 2007 Petitioners Versus 5mt. Kalpana Sharma and others State (Sovernment of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner '. P.fS) No. 358 of 2007 Rajendra famar Nag Versus ie State fiovernment of Chhatf-isgarh (Bid others SB; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Pre^nt: Mf. Ajay Shrivastma., Advocate for -the petitioner(s). Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Sovernment Adyocate for the re^sondents/State. OR &ER (Passed on this 23rd tSoy of Jonuary, 2007) 1. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioners as w«!l as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts of the present writ petitions are similar to that of in W. P. (^) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. 5+ate Sovernment of Chhatt'isgarh <S others), which wws allowed vide orcfer dated 7.11.2006. They further submit that the question of law involyed is atso the same. 2. In view of the above-fftated submissions made by learned tfbunsel for the parties, the writ petitions are altowed in terms of the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by this Court in W.P. (5.) No. 5976/2006 (5ushit Tiwari and others vs. 5tate Sovernment of Chhattisgarh & others). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record in other connected writ petition. StL- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1