THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 9618 of 2005 O R D E R: It appears, petitioner filed a complaint before respondent No.4 on various occasions. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.4 did not act upon the same and, therefore, he filed present writ petition seeking a direction to respondents 1 to 3 to take action against respondent No.4 for his inaction in acting on the complaints filed by the petitioner. There is no necessity of going into all the details. Respondents have filed detailed counter affidavit denying the allegations made by petitioner. It is stated that respondents 1 to 3 have enquired into the matter and found that there was nothing wrong with respondent No.4 in dealing with the complaints filed by the petitioner. In view of the same, nothing survives for further adjudication in the matter. The writ petition is accordingly closed. JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU. Date: 29-9-2010. MVB.