IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.4151 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 30.11.2010 Gahar Singh ......Appellant(s) Versus Vikram Singh and another ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate for the appellant. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) This is plaintiff's second appeal challenging the judgment and decrees of the Courts below whereby his suit for declaration that he was owner in possession of the suit land and decree dated 8. 8.1992 passed in Civil suit No.376 of 1992 was illegal with consequential relief of permanent injunction was dismissed. While non-suiting the appellant, both the Courts below have recorded a concurrent finding that the aforesaid decree which was passed in the year 1992 was very much in the knowledge of the appellant still he filed the suit in the year 2003 and the same was barred by limitation. Counsel for the appellant was unable to challenge the aforesaid finding of fact that the decree dated 8.8.1992 was to the knowledge of the appellant. No interference is warranted in the impugned judgment and decrees of the Courts below. No substantial question of law arises in this appeal. Dismissed. November 30, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE