dgm gm gm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.7735 OF 2008 PETITION NO.7735 OF 2008 PETITION NO.7735 OF 2008 Shri Basvewshar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Dhulkarewadi, through trustees Petitioner Vs. Shri Kallappa A.Mali & ors. Respondents. Mr.Rahul Kadam for the petitioner. Mr.S.J.Shekhar for respondent no.1. Mr.A.I.Patel, AGP for State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : ANOOP V.MOHTA,J ANOOP V.MOHTA,J ANOOP V.MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 18th February,2009. : 18th February,2009. : 18th February,2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. The petitioner has challenged the order of framing scheme dated 5.3.2008 by moving an application for condonation of delay in preferring the Appeal before the learned District Judge, Sangli under Section 72 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act. The delay is condoned recently. As application for stay to the said scheme was rejected, therefore, the present petition. 2. Considering the fact that the scheme has been framed in March 2008 and during this period till this date, there is no stay of whatsoever nature. The scheme in fact has been implemented. Therefore, I am ( 2 ) not inclined to grant stay on this application filed by the petitioner. However, considering the averments made, it is desirable that the learned District Judge to decide the Appeal filed by the petitioner expeditiously and preferably within four months. 3. With the above observation, writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)