@ S5N€ELE BENBH IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO. T296 éz OF 2011 émt. Nivedita Swarnakar, W/o Shri Kaush’al Prasad Swarnakar, aged about 38 years, Occupation— Housewife, R/o Village, Post & PETITIO N ER ’Police Station— Saria, District- Raigarh (C.G.) w VERSUS ‘ / RESPONDENTS : 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, i Through: the Secretary, w Nagriya Prashashan Avam Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. /'The Collector, Raigarh, District- Ralgarh (C.G.) 3/“ The Sub-Divisional Officer (R), Sarangarh, District— Raigarh (C.G.) 4. “The Nalb Tahsldar, Circle Saria, Tahsil- Baramkela, 'Dis‘trict— Raigarh (C.G.) 5/ The Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat— Saria, District- Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITZDIRECTION PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As given in the cause title. pARTrcuLARS ’OF THE RESPONDENTS As given in the cause title. x IGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO.7068 OF 2011 (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Roop Naik, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. Generai with Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents and respondent/ Nagar Panchayat -‘Saria. O R D E R (Passed on this 15m day of December, 201 1) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents subrnits that the respondent authorities have decided to withdraw the impugned notice dated 18-11-2011 (Annexure — P/1), as no sufficient time was given, and if necessary fresh notice shall be issued affording proper opportunity of hearing to the respective person to put fonNard their case, if any. 2. ln view of the above, according to the learned counsel I appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. W 3. I Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. g I ‘ ”“M‘TW Sdl- SATISH K. ANGNIHOTRI > g, Judge , M .1 PETITIONER Smt. Nivedita Swarnakar Versus RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh & Others