IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 21st day of October, 2010 1st Bail application No. 929 of 2010 Order on the bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Ravi @ Raj Nath … Applicant Vs State of Uttarakhand … Opposite Party --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arising out of F.I.R. No. 32 of 2010 Under Sections 328, 363, 366 and 376 of I.P.C. Police Station Ramnagar District Nainital By the court Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri Partiroop Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the victim – Km. Savita had left her home on 12.02.2010 and has been recovered after twenty days. He further submitted that as per the medical report as well as statement of the victim, she is aged about 19 years and was major on the date of incident. He also argued that the applicant and the victim – Savita were the consenting parties and the victim remained in the company of the applicant for about 20 days without raised any hue and cry. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the papers available on record and without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 21.10.2010 ASWAL