1 appa849.10 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.849 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.485 OF 2006 Shri Sunil Atmaram More. ....Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra. ....Respondent. Mr. Prakash Wagh for applicant. Mr. D.P.Adsule, APP for State. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND U.D.SALVI, JJ DATED:- AUGUST 26, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. It is not in dispute that earlier bail application filed by the Appellant came to be rejected on 16th March, 2008. No changed circumstance has been brought on record. Counsel for the Applicant however, submits that the Applicant by now has undergone five years of sentence period out of total 12 years imposed by the trial Court. That however, is not even 50% of the sentence awarded by the trial Court. Besides, learned APP points out that the State has already filed cross-appeal for enhancement of 2 appa849.10 sentence. 2. Taking over all view of the matter, therefore, no interference is warranted. Bail Application is rejected. 3. So far as the appeal is concerned, the same be listed for final hearing as per its turn, if ready in all respects in the category "accused in jail". (U.D.SALVI, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)