HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 13th December, 2011 2nd Bail Application No. 118 of 2011 Order on the bail application of the accused. 1. Umesh Sah S/o Rajender 2. Anil S/o Ramchandra Sah ……. Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party In Case Crime No. 46 of 2010 (S.T.No. 352 of 2010) U/s 328, 379, 411 I.P.C. Police Station G.R.P. Laksar District Haridwar Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Shashi Kant Shandilya, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. T.C. Agarwal, the learned A.G.A. for the State. The 1st Bail application was rejected on merit by an order dated 28th March, 2011. This is the 2nd bail application moved by the applicants. In view of the admission made by the learned A.G.A. that the two important witnesses have turned hostile, the Court without commenting anything further on the merit of the case is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Consequently, Bail Application is allowed. Let the applicants Umesh Sah and Anil be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 46 of 2010, U/s 328, 379, 411 I.P.C., on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 13.12.2011 Shiv 2