35NQLE $EN£§£ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDLCATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR' w.P.No.3‘H>‘7 2006 C57 / / Arun Kumar Jha, S/o Shri R. D. Jha, Aged about 53 years, Currently posted as Sub Div. Officer, Sub Division Kawardha, Kawardha Forest Division, KabirDham, R/o C~1, Anupam Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Versus Petitioner Respondents : / 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Forest Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, District: Raipur— (C.G.) The Principal Chief Conservator Of > ,Forest, Forest Department, Raipur, District: Raipur— (C.G.) Divisionai Forest Officer, 'Kawardha Forest Division. District KabirDham (C.G.) a K.K. Sharma, Officer lncharge,Narangi Area, Bijapur Forest Division e” WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA _\ X-HC—78 I HW,WW,W Q 9 mm 1H 2006 mv%aan%sr WW§WW $Wm WW(H§W) 1 2-7-2006 Miss Deepaii Pandey, Panel advance oopy‘ Heard both the counsel. By the instant writ petition, t 1e petitioner has questioned his transfer order dent No1 on the ground that he has been 8 months and that he has been transferred to (ed for about 6 years in the Bastar region from s 4r. Maneesh Sharma. couns el for the petitioner. Lawyer forthe Statelrespondents No.1 to 3; on dated 7-7-2006 passed by respon transferred within a short period of ’i Bijapur whereas he has already worl 1986 to 1992, and the person who been transferred at the place ofthe petitioner has worked only for two years in the astar region. Learned counsel for the pe itioner submits that since the transfer of the petitioner is against the transfer p licy; therefore, he may be allowed to make a representation to respondent No.1 to which learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents No.1 to 3 has ho bjection. Having heard learned couns l for the parties, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and witho 't’expressing any opinion on merit of the case) the request made by learned couns i for the petitioner is just, fair and reasonable. Therefore, the petitioner is ailowed t make a detailed representation raising all his ‘ grievances annexing a copy of the \r rit petition to respondent No.1 within ten days irected to decide the representation within one after considering the points raised by the a from today and respondent No.1 is month from the date of its rece i petitioner, in an objective manner, in accordance with law. With the direction aforesaid, petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(‘W.)P.No.2 20/2006 also stands disposed of. Parties are entitled for certifie ' copy of this order. Sd/— i L.C. Bhadoo h i e