IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1735 of 2009 Shyam Kishore Rai son of Late Saryug Rai, resident of village- Rampur Rajnawa P.S. Hasanpur, District- Samastipur. … Informant/Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Umesh Rai son of Braj Kishore Rai 3. Indra Mohan Rai son of Braj Kishore Rai 4. Braj Kishore Rai @ Kali Rai Son of Triveni Rai. 5. Jai Ram Rai son of Late Ram Bujhwan Rai 6. Hare Ram Rai son of Jai Ram Rai. O. P. NOs.2 to 6 all of village Rampur Rajwa, P.S. Hasanpur, District- Samastipur. … Accused/Opp. Parties. ------ For the petitioner :Mr. Nirmal Kr. Sinha, Adv. For the State :Dr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ---------------------------------- 2. 01.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. It appears that by the impugned order dated 17.9.2009 passed in G. R. No. 346 of 2000, Trial No. 69 of 2009, learned Judicial Magistrate, 2nd Class, Rosera has considered the evidence of both the parties and has found that the prosecution evidence is full of contradiction and not fit to be relied upon and thereafter the accused have been granted benefit of doubt and they have been acquitted from the charge under Section 379 IPC. Considering the facts and 2 circumstances, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. Kanchan (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)