IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-20665 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 21, 2010 Surjan Singh .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Mohit Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.109 dated 16.6.2010, under Section 304-B IPC, registered at Police Station Chhehartta, Tehsil and District Amritsar. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully. Petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased, who died unnatural death just after two years of her marriage in the house of her in-laws. There are specific allegations of harassment and cruelty on account of dowry against the petitioner and the co-accused. Son of petitioner is admittedly working at Dubai and however, as per the allegations, daughter of the complainant was not sent with her husband. Hence, in view of these facts, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner- accused. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Surjan Singh for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 21.7.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge