4T>t ^^? HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petitioti (S) No. 1456 of2009 PETITIONER : Ramdas Sumaii, S/o Sadhram Suman, aged about 63 ye^rs, Retired Head Master, R/o Village Bhatgaon, Post Kosir, Tahsil Sai-angarh, DistrictRaigarh (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1.8tateofChhattisgarhthroughtheSecretary,Department of School Education, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur 2. Accountant GeneraL Clihattisg^rh, Raipur(CG). 3. Accounts OfficenE Office of the Accountant General, Chhardsgarh, Raipur (CG). 4. The Joint Director, Accounf, Treasmy <& Pension, Bilaspur(CG). 5. Block Education Officer, Sarangarh, District Raigarh (WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 QF THE CONSITmTIQN OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Amuhotri, J.) Present : Shi'i U.R. Khosle, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advoc^te forthe State. Sliri Basant Kaiwart, Advocate fortlie respondent No. 2to 4. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 19th day ofMarch, 2009) With the conseiTt ofthe parties, the matter istaken up for hearingiinally. 1. The petitioner, by this petition impugns the noti^ce dated 03.11.2008/24.11.2008 (Annexure P/l), whereby the petitioner was called upon to submit his response to the excess paynientimade to him. Tlie (-. petitioner has submitted his reply on 10.01.2009 (Aimexure P/4). 2. Without waiting for the decision,the petitioner has approached this court. As on date, sio order to recover the excess amount is in existence, as no order on consideration ofreply ofthe petitioner has been passed. Thus, this petition is premature as no cause ofactionhas arisentill date. 3. The present petition has no merit and is accordmgly dismissed. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge