IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2011 / 30TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 32894 of 2007(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER : -------------------- SANTHOSH KUMAR, S/O.SISHUPALAN, EDAKKUNNIL HOUSE, KODINJAM, KUTTIKADU P.O., KADKACKAL, KOTTARAKKARA. BY ADVS. SRI.ALEXANDER GEORGE SRI.DILIP MOHAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), TALUK OFFICE, KOTTARAKARA. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, KADACKAL, KOTTARAKARA TALUK. 4. JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, KOTTARAKARA. 5. SEEVUKHAN, S/O.ABDUL KAREEM, BLOCK NO.39, ELAVUPALAM, EX.SERVICEMEN COLONY P.O. MADATHARA (VIA), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BIJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 32894 of 2007(N) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 22.4.2004. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 24.8.2007. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE RTO KOLLAM 23.10.2007. EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 27.9.2007 SENT TO THE JOINT RTO, KOTTARAKARA. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.32894 OF 2007 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT This writ petition comes up in the defect list today. The defect is that notice has not been served on the 5th respondent. The defect was notified. The petitioner did not take steps to cure the same. Therefore, the matter was posted before the Registrar (Judicial) on 18.7.2011 for defects. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner before the Registrar (Judicial) on that day. That is why the writ petition has been posted in the defect list of this court today. When the matter was taken up today, none appears for the petitioner. The defect also subsists. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd