IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC SATURDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2011 / 29TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22715 of 2011(L) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. INDIRA, D/O.DANEIL NADAR, PALLANADU KARA, MARAYUR VILLAGE, MARAYUR. 2. VIJAYAKUMAR, S/O.DANEIL NADAR, PALLANADU KARA, MARAYUR VILLAGE, MARAYUR. 3. JAYAPRAKASH, S/O.DANEIL NADAR, PALLANADU KARA, MARAYUR VILLAGE, MARAYUR. 4. CHRISTAL RANI, D/O.DANEIL NADAR, PALLANADU KARA, MARAYUR VILLAGE, MARAYUR. BY ADVS. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) SRI.P.S.SIDHAN SRI.V.K.RAJANANDAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. FOREST RANGE OFFICER, FOREST RANGE OFFICE, MARAYUR - 676 176. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICER OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, DEVIKOLAM - 676 176. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.M.J. RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 22715/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 17/11/2009 SUBMITTED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P2: COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 15/12/2009 FURNISHED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P3: COPY OF THE REMINDER DATED 20/12/2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P4: COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 06/01/2010 SUBMITTED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MARAYUR TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P5: COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE DEPUTY FORESTER, MARAYUR TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 22715 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of August , 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners state that by submitting Ext.P3 they sought for permission of the first respondent for cutting and removing the rose wood trees from the property in Re.Sy.N.112/3 of block No.47 of Marayur Village. It is their case that on Ext.P3, enquiry was conducted by revenue authorities and that despite having submitted their reports, the first respondent has not so far passed any orders on it. It is complaining of the above, this writ petition is filed. 2. In the circumstances as noticed, the writ petition is disposed of directing that Ext.P3 application made by the petitioner having received and is pending orders thereon, the respondent shall consider the same in accordance with law and pass orders on it as expeditiously W.P.(C) No. 22715 OF 2011 :2 : as possible at any rate within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-