ft-^W-i^iK^-''^ '^i-i,?-i>/S/^/vr-r^rtr^~^t IN THE HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE. CHHATISGARHAT BILASUR. s^ WRIT PETITION N0. 5^-S% OF 2006. PETITIONER -^. '.^^.i-r^ ^.^!>'"^y-. ^:> ^'..^'^- .%^ ..•••""c.^:-"^-"" ^ Anil Kumar Mishra, S/0 Shri Ramhit Mishra, Aged About 42 Years, R/0 Kududand, Mata Chowrah, BUaspur, P.0. Bilaspur Dist C.G. State. VERSUS / RESPONDENTS. ,s?y& 1. StateOfChhatisgarh Through Secretary (Lawj .Govemment Of Chhatisgarh, DKS Bhawan, Raipur. C.G. State. 2.Executive Chgurman, C.G. State Legal Services Authority, Warehouse Road, BUaspur. C.G. State. 3. Member-Secretary, C.G. State Legal Services Authority, Warehouse Road, Bilaspur. C.G. State. N 'r- RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 QF 'LHE _CONSTITUT!ON OF INDIA POR ISSUANCE OP APPROPRIATE WRfT (SkWORDER (S) / DIRECTION {S), ETC. ? XI-HC-78 ^sf '^W\^, wKww, Riciiuy Lj.'F.S^S^/ +ii*iwi sb*ll<*» :^200^' W^\ 4s|cb ('i^t^S.'^) 3n^T5RTR.f HWSn^TOTR; -^- 5oma 6«ii«]RBf?a'3Ti^r r'« 6-7-2006 Mr. K.R. Nair, counsel for thj Mr. Satish Supta, Deputy Sc|vt advcnce copy. Heard. The grievance raised by the 226/227 of the Constitution of Indi promotion on compietion of tweive ^ec Before approaching this Cou| ofjustice notice to the respondent; first instance, the petitioner to[ respondents and if his grievance is approach this Court. With the above observation. +i'I<Fd<l1-f tiit<dTfftecfl'<Ri<?ii< ^sri^Tan^r petitionsr-. 't. Advocate for the State/respondent, on ietitioner in this writ petition under Article ia is that he has not been given time bound \|ears of service. |*t, the petitioner has not sent the demand regarding his grievance. Therefore, in the 9ive demand of justice notice to the ^ot rsdr'essed, then he wili be at iiberty to the petition stands disposed of^ Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge •^/ o ^v