THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY W.P.Nos.25178 of 2001 and 4762 of 2002 COMMON ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) Since the issue raised in these three writ petitions is similar, they are being disposed of by this common order. These writ petitions are filed aggrieved by the order, dated 15-11-2001, passed in L.G.C.No.83 of 1996 by the Special Court under A.P.Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act. The respondents 4, 5 and 6 in the L.G.C. filed W.P.No.25178 of 2001 and the 3rd respondent in the L.G.C. filed W.P.No.4762 of 2002. The said L.G.C. was filed by the 2nd respondent herein. The said L.G.C. was allowed holding the respondents therein to be land grabbers of the schedule property and they were directed to deliver the vacant possession of the schedule property to the applicant therein i.e., the 2nd respondent herein. W.P.No.25178 of 2001 is dismissed for default in favour of the respondents 3 and 6 to 8 and W.P.No.4762 of 2002 is dismissed for default in favour of the respondents 3, 4 and 10. We are not inclined to go into the merits of the case. The judgment of the Special Court has become final insofar as the respondents 3, 4, 6 to 8 and 10 are concerned. When the property is said to have been grabbed jointly and when the relief as well as the judgment are inseparable, there cannot be two conflicting judgments among the co-respondents. Therefore, the writ petitions are liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J ____________________________ G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY, J Date : 10-08-2011 Prv