THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO CRL.R.C.NO.457 OF 2009 ORDER:- The revision is fled against the dismissal of the C.C.No.183 of 2002 on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Puttur. The complainant, who is the revision petitioner, alleged that there was love between the petitioner and the accused and thereafter a child was born and the respondent started harassing her and thereby committed an offence under Section 498-A and 417 IPC. The petitioner is also said to have filed a maintenance case being M.C.No.6 of 2002 and after considering the evidence on record, the Court below has not accepted the factum of marriage as there was no recorded evidence and the only certificate issued by the temple does not disclose the name of the petitioner that she has been married to the respondent. Therefore, the acquittal of the respondent is based on an appreciation of the evidence and there is no illegality or irregularity in the trial. Therefore, there are no merits and the order of acquittal does not call for any interference. However, the petitioner will be at liberty to file any suit for declaration of her status as wife and any of the observations made in this order will not be applicable for appreciation of the evidence in that case. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. _______________________ N.R.L. NĀGESWARA RĀO,J 28-12-2011 TSNR