-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.1147 OF 1991 Shri Shankar Sidram Patil, ) Resident of District Health ) Office, Karwar, Karnataka State )..Petitioner Versus Shri Ganpati Baswant Naukudkar, ) resident of Kudnur, Taluka ) Chandgad, Dist. Kolhapur. )..Respondent Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate i/b. Varsha Palav, for the Petitioner Mr. S.M. Sabrad, for the Respondent CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. REBELLO J. F.I. REBELLO J. F.I. REBELLO J. DATE DATE DATE : : : 12th January, 2005 ORAL JUDGMENT: . The Thasildar by his order of 21st February, 1983 held that the tenant is not willing to purchase the land under Section 32-G(3) of the Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1958 and declared the purchase ineffective. In the Appeal preferred being Appeal NO.41 of 1983 by order dated 25th February, 1985 the matter was remanded back to the Tahsildar to dispose of the matter according to law. The petitioner aggrieved preferred a Revision. That was dismissed for default by order dated 8th April, 1988. Application for restoration filed was also dismissed and hence the present petition. 2. In my opinion this would not be a fit case for this Court to exercise the extra ordinary jurisdiction considering that both the petitioner and respondent will have an -2- opportunity of having the hearing before the Assistant Tahsildar. In the light of that Rule discharged. No order as to costs. (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.)