1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.A. N0. 356/2004 APPELLANT‘s 1. CHHEDURAM S/o KANKU SAHU, PLAINTIFFS AGED 65 YEARS. 2. DEOPRASAD slo BHANARAM SAHU, AGED 55 YEARS, § 3. RAMPRASAD S/o BHANARAM SAHU AGED 50 YEARS, 4. RESHAM BAI W/o BHANARAM (DIED & REMOVED ALL R/o VILLAGE BAIJNATH, TAHSIL u . KASDOL, DISIT. RAIPUR (c.G.). DEOMATI D/o BHANARAM, AGED 52 YEARS W/O MALIKRAM SAHU, R/o VILLAGE BHILOUNI, P.0. KOHRQUD, TAHSIL PAMGARH, DISTT. BILASPUR (c.G.). .VERsus REsPONDEN'rs 1. NONI BAI W/o RJHHU SAHU, AGED DEFENDANTS 65 YEARS, R/o VILLAGE KHAIRA VIA. KATGI TAHSIL KASDOL, DISTF. RAIPUR (c.G.) 2. SONI BAI W/o DAYARAM SAHU, AGED 62 YEARS, R/o VILLAGE MATIYA 13.0. MATIYA, TAHSIL KASDOL, DISIT. RAIPUR (C.G.). 3. STATE OE CHHAIVI‘ISGARH, THROUGH, COLLEGI‘OR RAIPUR (CG). SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. (SB :Hon’ble Mt. T.P.Sha.rma,.J.) Present— Shn' Shree Kumar Aglawal, Sr, Advocate with Shri Vimlesh Bajpai, Advocat€ for the appellants. Shn' Rakesh Jha, Dy. G.A. for the State] mspondent No. 3. ORAL- JUDGEMENT (Passed on 12/11/2010) 1. By this Second appea} appellants have challenged the legality and propriety of the judgment and decree of dismissal of civil appeal dated 27/4/04 passed by First Addiu'onal Distn'ct Judge Baloda Bazar C.G. in Civil Appeal No. 47—A/ 03. g) gé; D‘un'ng the course of argument learned counsel for the appellants submits that he seeks to Withdraw second appeal with liberty to flle appropriate petition] suit if so advice or occasion arise. Prayer is allowed. Consequently, this second appeal is dismissed as Withdrawn with aforesaid liberty available under the law. No order as to costs. ‘ we Sdl— T. P. Sharma Judge