IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.224 of 2007 RAJ KUMAR MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 14.5.2008 Heard Mr. Yugal Kishore for the petitioner and Mr. Ahsanuddin Amanullah, learned Standing Counsel no. 17, for the respondents. This application has been filed by the petitioner of CWJC No.5632 of 2006 (Raj Kumar Mahto Vs. The State of Bihar) for review and/or recall of the order dated 25.7.2007, whereby the writ petition was disposed of on merits in the absence of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order may be recalled because it was disposed of in his absence and may be reheard for a fresh decision. I am not inclined to accede to the submission inter alia, for the reason that such an application is not maintainable because the writ petition was disposed of on merits. This review application is dismissed. S.Ali (S.K. Katriar, J.)