mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 24 of 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1103 of 2006 Smt.Vanita H. Vengurlekar .. Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & 2 ors. .. Respondents ... Mr.P.M. Havnur for the petitioner. Mr.S.P. Thorat with Mr.Rammurthy Ramesh for respondent nos.1 to 3. Mr.Milind More for the State. CORAM : D.G.KARNIK, J DATED : 17th April 2008 P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. This petition is filed for contempt of the court alleging that the respondent has committed a breach of the order passed by the Division Bench on 27th June 2006 in Writ Petition no.1103 of 2006. Perused the order. In paragraph no.5 of the order, the Division Bench directed the respondent no.2 to decide in terms of the rules who was entitled to flat no.601 and accordingly make allotment. 3. The dispute regarding allotment is between the petitioner Mrs.Vengurlekar and one Mr.Iftikhar A. Siddiqui. Both of them were claiming that he/she alone was entitled to allotment of flat no.601. By an order dated 23rd January 2008 respondent no.2 has held that Mr. Iftikhar A. Siddiqui was entitled to flat no.601 and the petitioner was not. Thus, the order of the Division Bench has been complied with. If the petitioner is in any way aggrieved by the order dated 23rd January 2008, her remedy lies in challenging the order before the appropriate forum. I do not find any breach of the order of this court. 3. In the circumstances, Contempt Petition is dismissed summarily. (D.G. KARNIK, J)