IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 24-07-2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.14243 of 2009 & M.P.No. 1 of 2009 A.Gunasekaran .. Petitioner. Versus 1.The Union of India, rep. by The Chief Secretary to Government, Chief Secretariat, Puducherry. 2.The Secretary to Government(Revenue), Revenue Department, Puducherry 3. The District Collector, Puducherry 4. The Managing Director, M/s.Pondicherry Industries Promotion Development Industries Corporation, Puducherry-1 .. Respondents. Prayer: Petition filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to delete the lands belonging to the Petitioner's family at Karasur Revenue Villages RS No.12/6, 0-51,00R from acquisition for the purpose of Special Economic Zone. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Gnanasekar For Respondents : Ms.N.Mala Government Advocate (P) O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. By consent of the parties, the Writ petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal. 3. Though the prayer sought for by the petitioner in the present writ petition is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the second respondent, with regard to the reliefs sought for in the Writ petition and if the second respondent is directed to dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a stipulated period. 4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the second respondent, with regard to reliefs sought for in the writ petition, within a period of fifteen days from today and on receipt of such representation, the second respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks thereafter. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation to the second respondent, along with the copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently connected M.P. is also closed. arr Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar To 1.The Chief Secretary to Government, Union of India, Chief Secretariat, Puducherry. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. The Secretary to Government(Revenue), Revenue Department, Puducherry 3. The District Collector, Puducherry. 4. The Managing Director, M/s.Pondicherry Industries Promotion Development Industries Corporation, Puducherry-1 + 1 cc to Mr. M. Gnanasekar, Advocate SR No.34652 + 1 cc to the Government Pleader, SR No.34290 Writ Petition No.14243 of 2009 RSI(CO) SR/28.7.2009 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/