IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 26352 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: October 1, 2010. Satnam Singh ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab and another. ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.D.Sachdeva, Addl.A.G., Punjab. Mr. B.S.Jaswal, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.125 dated 08.09.2009, under Sections 406/498A/120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Bholath, District Kapurthala. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the complainant that dispute between the parties CRM No.M-26352 of 2010 has since been settled and that petitioner and respondent No.2 are living together. Hence, it has been stated by learned counsel for the respondent No.2 that he has no objection if the present petition filed on behalf of petitioner-husband is accepted. Hence, in view of these facts the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of Satnam Singh is accepted. However, petitioner is directed to join the investigation and in case he is arrested, he shall be released on bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) October 1, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2