@- C^(^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.No. .^..7.^../2006 ;':'N> agiia PETITIONER .•°'.•^' RESPONDENTS ,< .e^ w^' <..- ^Z.'' _ -^" ^'^ 0< ^*d^ ^'^°^ \i^.o- .?>• .^^ ^^•' ^NP ^^ Amrit Lal Yadav S/o Dular Sai Aged about 31 years, R/o Village - Bataupali A Block Sarangarh Distt Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of C.G. through Secretary Panchayat and \i^ ^ ..•••* Social welfare dept. Mantralay Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Election Commissioner State Election Commission, Raipur (C.G.). 3. Distt Collector (Distt Returining Officer) Raigrarh (C.G.). 4. Addl. Collector Raigarh Camp. Sarangarh Distt Raigarh. 5. Retiu-ning Officer/Naib Tahsildar, By Election ' Panchayat Block/Tah. Sarangarh, Distt Raigarh WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. r HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH: BILASPOR Siagle Beach: Hon'ble Shrt Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W. P. No. 6716 of 2006 Petitioner : Amrit Lal Yadav Versus Respondent : State of Chhattisgarh & othera Shri K. N. Nandc, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri N. K. Agarwal, Depuly Advocate General for the respondents. ORDER (5th Deeember, 2006) 1. The petitioner was etected as Sarpanch of fhe Grain Panchayat Bataupali 'A' block - Sarangarh, distdct- Raigarh in the election held iu fhe month ofJaauaiy, 2005. On fhe basis ofcomplaint against the petitmaer regarding fmancial iiTegularities, he was disqualiGed vide order dated 13.6.2006, passed by the prescribed authority i.e. Sub Divisioual OfiBcer Sarangarh. 2. Beiug aggrieved the petitioner has fited an appeal before the CoBector which is pendiag consideratioB.. Leanied counsel for the petitioner siihmits that. the election is schediiled tn be helrl on 8& December, 2006 duriug fhe pendency of the appeal beforc the Colfector, wttich Tias heen listed fbr he^aring on 20th necember, 2006. 3. In the facts and circuinstaiices offhe case, the CoUectDr is directed to take up the grievance of the petitioner before 8.12.2006 and pass appropriate order, ia accordauce with law, wifhout bein^ influenced by the observations, ifaay, made hereinabove. 4. Wifh fhe above dircction, this petition stands disposed of finatty. No order as to costs. 5. Certified copy offhe order, as per Rules be supplied today itself. Thakur SA'- Satish K. Agisihotri Judge