IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 8060 of 2010 Date of decision: January 27, 2011 Yash Pal and another .. Petitioners Vs. Punjab & Sind Bank and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.K. Rana, Advocate for Mr. I.P.Singh, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Mr. R.N. Moudgil, Advocate for respondent No.2. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 14.9.2010 (Annexure P3) passed by the trial court whereby evidence of the petitioner-defendants was closed by order. Arguments heard. Learned counsel states that he wants to examine only Yash Pal- petitioner No.1. Though the petitioner was given numerous opportunities to conclude his evidence, yet, it would be expedient in the interest of justice to grant one opportunity to the petitioner to conclude his evidence. As such, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to the trial court to grant one opportunity to the petitioner- defendants to conclude their evidence subject to payment of Rs.3000/- as costs. January 27, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge