CWP No.10015 of 1991 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (I) CWP No.10015 of 1991 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.08.2011 Sh. Jai Parkash son of Sh. Kamal Singh, Village and Post Office Kalanaur (Barapana) District Rohtak and another ... Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary to government Haryana, Excise & Taxation Department, Chandigarh and others ... Respondents (II) CWP No.5069 of 1991 (O&M) Surinder Kumar Batra and others ... Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana and others ... Respondents (III) CWP No11916 of 1991 (O&M) Jai Bhagwan Hooda and another ... Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana and others ... Respondents (IV) CWP No.12507 of 1991 (O&M) Ramesh Singh ... Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others ... Respondents (V) CWP No.7857 of 1991 (O&M) Jitender Pal ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present: None for the petitioners. Ms. Kirti Singh, DAG, Haryana. ***** CWP No.10015 of 1991 (O&M) [2] 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? NO K. KANNAN, J. (Oral) All these cases have been adjourned sine die to await the decision of Supreme Court in similar pending matters. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners to apprise the Court about the status of the cases alleged to be pending in the Supreme Court. All the writ petitions are, accordingly, dismissed for non- prosecution of the petitions. AUGUST 29, 2011 ( K. KANNAN ) Rajan JUDGE CWP No.10015 of 1991 (O&M) [3] 573 The claim in the petition are for an appointment to the post of Apprentice Development Officer. It appears that the petitioner's claim had figured in the contingent list and the grievance was that in spite of availability of seats, the petitioner had not been granted appointment. The relief sought for in the writ petition have become infrcutuous. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.