IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.2238 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision: 02.12.2011 Bachan …..Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ……Respondents CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon’ble Mrs.Justice Sabina Present: Ms.Sarla Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner Ms.Shubhra Singh, DAG Haryana Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) As per affidavit filed, case of the petitioner for grant of parole has already been initiated and sent to District Magistrate, Hathrath (UP). The District Magistrate has not recommended parole case of the petitioner on the ground of apprehension that he will abscond. It is further stated that the Commissioner Gurgaon Division was not satisfied with the report submitted by the District Magistrate and case has been referred back to the concerned officer and it is stated that benefit of house repair parole has already been granted to the petitioner and as when the requisite surety bonds are furnished and accepted by the above officer he will be released on parole. In view of above, this petition has become infructuous. Disposed of accordingly. (Jasbir Singh) Judge 02.12.2011 (Sabina) gk Judge