IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No: 394 of 2008 BETWEEN: Kola Hema Malini W/o. Late Kola Siva Nageswara Rao R/o. 2-2-64/15/A, Flat No.201, Sai Srinivasa Apartments, Amberpeta, Hyderabad ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Branch Manager, State Bank of Hyderabad Nallakunta Branch, Nallakunta, Hyderabad 2 The Authorised officer, State Bank of Hyderabad Nallakunta Branch, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 5.10.2008 for grant of time to settle the loan amount in pursuance of the possession notice dated 27.1.2007 issued by the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant time to settle the loan in pursuance of possession notice dated 27.12.2007 issued by the 2nd respondent and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.Y.SUBBHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) On the earlier occasion, as nobody appeared for the petitioners, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Today also, even when the matter is listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J June 23, 2009 DSK