IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18517 of 2010 PARSHURAM MUKHIYA, S/o Chhedi Mukhiya. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 23.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 05.08.2007 vide Cr. Misc. No. 28503 of 2009 with observation that the trial be expedited and conclude it within a period of nine months. The impugned order reveals that there has been no progress in the trial at all since even now after the two witnesses initially examined no other witness has been examined despite processes. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named who is in custody since 04.05.2007 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-II, Supaul in connection with S.Tr. No. 97 of 2008 arising out of Nirmali P.S. Case No. 15 2 of 2007 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)