IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE NO.13953 OF 2005 BIJAY CHAUDHARY SON OF SRI SHIVNATH CHAUDHARY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SIMARAHI, P.S. RAGHOPUR, DISTRICT- SUPAUL Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE COMMISSIONER, KOSHI DIVISION, SAHARSA 4. THE DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER-CUM-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SUPAUL 5. THE ZILA PANCHAYAT RAJ PADADHIKARI, SUPAUL 6. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BIRPUR, SUPAUL 7. THE BLOCK PANCHAYAT SAMITI THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER-CUM-B.D.O. PANCHAYAT SAMITI, BLOCK RAGHOPUR, DISTRICT- SUPAUL 8. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER-CUM-BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER NAMELY MR. MAQSOOD ALAM, BLOCK PANCHAYAT SAMITI, RAGHOPUR, SUPAUL ----------------- 2 23.11.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State are present. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the writ petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that the challenge is to the letter dated 15.10.2005 for fixing the date for holding election of vacant post of Pramukh, Panchayat Samitee, Raghopur and in view of passage of time and fresh elections having been held in the year 2011, nothing remains to be adjudicated. This Court is inclined to accept the submission of the learned counsel for the State. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition having become infructuous stands disposed off. Manish/- ( Ahsanuddin Amanullah,J.)