IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25318 of 2009 RANJAY KUMAR @ TULLU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 27-10-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The submission in this application for anticipatory bail under sections 366, 366(A) and 120(B) of the I.P.C. is of compromise. The prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected by this Court as far back as on 19.12.2005. The offence is non-compoundable and hence the question of reconsideration for anticipatory bail does not arise. The aspect of compromise is a matter to be appropriately kept in mind in an application for regular bail without being prejudiced by the present order. The application is rejected. ( Navin Sinha, J ) BTiwary/