1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2856 OF 2009 Arvind Kumar L. Jain .. Petitioner Vs Hukumraj Hamirchand Bafna .. Respondent Y.K.Sharma i/b Ganesh & Co for the petitioner S.H. Joshi for respondent no. 1 CORAM : A.S. OKA, J DATE : 28th JULY, 2009 P.C.: 1. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner - original plaintiff has taken an exception to the order passed by the trial court by which the respondent / defendant has been permitted to file written statement. The trial court has extended the time to file written statement though the written statement was sought to be filed after 79 days from the date on which the period stipulated by law expired. Rma wp2856-09.sxw 2 2. The order impugned is purely an interlocutory order. In the event decree passed in the suit is adverse to the petitioner, he can always challenge the order impugned while preferring an appeal against the decree which may be passed in the suit. Therefore, no case for interference at this stage is made out. Subject to what is observed above, writ petition is rejected. JUDGE Rma wp2856-09.sxw