IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 221 OF 2000 THE CHIEF OFFICER PMC,PANAJI,GOA. ....Petitioner Versus SHRI JOSE ALBANO RODRIGUES & ANR. ....Respondent Mr. A.F. Diniz, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. N. Narvekar, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. Date:- 27th September, 2006 P.C. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the respondent. The learned Counsel for the petitioner undertakes to file his Wakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner. By this petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 23.5.2000 passed by the learned Administrative Tribunal, Goa in Information Appeal No.24/2000 whereby the Appellant was directed to furnish information to the Respondent sought for by the Respondent, within 10 days from the date of receipt of the order. Now, the learned Counsel for the respondent has filed purshis categorically stating that respondent no.1 is no longer interested in securing the document from the Panaji Municipal and that there is no objection if the said order dated 23.5.2000 is set aside by this Court. In view of the same, the impugned order dated 23.5.2000 passed by the learned Administrative Tribunal, Goa stands quashed and set aside. Rule is made absolute accordingly, however with no order as to costs. DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ef.