© c^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BIIASPUR PETITIONER W<P. N0» 353^/2003 s Pat Ram Sao, Son of late Shri Ram Baresa Sc30^ aged about 52 years-^ resident of Naya Dha.ba, j Ward No> 2, Ra, jnandgaon^ | Post s Bajrangpur^ Naya Dhaba^ Distt $ RajnandgaoHo VER S U S RESPONDENTS <\^^^ ^!^^^" °?>^^. .^^" / t l^ Stateiof Chhattisgarh |t through the Secretary^ i] School Edacatlon Department, ii D^K<S< Bailding^ Mantrala.ya|| ^^ Raipar^ Distt $ Raipar < C G ). ^^^" '^ The Director^ public Instru-i tion, ^tate of Chhattis- garh^ Baron Ba^ar^ Ralpur^ Distt : Raipur \ ( C G 5. : ^^ WRIT PETTTIOVS\JNDERAR7J^LES_ 226/227 OFT^ OF INDIA XI-HC-22 3^T'^T f<4<+> sni^T ^^ ^rfiTT ^) ^^ ^l^td^ ^•al^i<o, i®i<ni^y ^...\^:S:......3S.^/y3 H8*ICr88 ^RS^ 'fN^ST' 3?ni^T'^HW^rftcT 13.02.2004 Petitioner by Miss Pritha Shri Raabir Singh, 0+1 Respondente. The Biaia challenge ia dated 10.10,2003 the petitione^ of fhe Chhattisgarh Civil Appeal) Rules, 1966 on tiie ali offence under sectiou 306/ judgnient dated 5,7,2003 pass^ convicted, The petitioner is School- TUai, District - petitioner submits fhat fhe tr^al Court has already been dated 11.7,2003 passed in Crm^ the suspension from service shoj There is no provision siispension from. service on conviction awarded by fhe appeal, More over the petitioncij Rule 23(3) of the Rules, alteraative aad efScacious redressal of his grievmice by Authority. However, it is inade (phoshal, Advocate, )vt. Advocate on behalf of fhe tbis Sefvlces grc^und <ftt^I<ri<ili 'WI^f '^ fe^l' <F5|^< ^ 3?iPOT 3T^T writ petition is fhat vide order has been suspended imder Rule 9 (Classi&cation, Conti'ol aad tiiat petitioner was accused ia of fhe Indiaa Penal Code aad vide |d in S.T.No. 38/2002 he has been as Prmcipal m the Govt, High Igaon, Leamed counsel for the of conviction awaixled by fhe l^spended by this Court vide order (inal Appeal No. 730/2003, therefore luld be revoked, ttie Rules for revocatlon of Uie pie ground that the sentence of Coiirt has been suspended in. has a right to fUe an appeal uuder Therefore the petitiouer has available under fhe law for ^ng aa appeal before the conipetent [clear fhat if fhe petitioner files an 3|4 woilfcmg Rajn^iid seiiltence sU; ^nmtui- untier trlal 19|66. reidedY filtn! -—^^i^^si.^. XI-HC-22 '3^';:;siFn^IZT, ^Tll<l<l<o, i®l<vll^y 3^?T J^^K 'Wfl?ff<9n:lNR''''*''''a^F^ 200-^ ^ '^^ss' S^T^T 'R^FF 371^1 sti^ic^ ^a ^n^F^CTW^fer -1-- appeal withio. a period of 30 daysj appeal under the Rules, 1966 nia)| In view of the above orde|r liberty to tiie petitioner aforesaid, Certified copy, as per Rules.| ^<^i<vt<ilt Tn1rof "^fe^ <Hti<^i< ^73<P<1H ^^f from today fh-e limitation in filiag not coine in his way. fhe petition is dismissed with Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge