X-OBJECTIONS No.76-CII of 2010 & -1- FAO No.3569 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH X-OBJECTIONS No.76-CII of 2010 & FAO No.3569 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: January 10, 2011 BALPREET SINGH ...APPELLANT VERSUS RAJINDER MANDAL & OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN. 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement. No 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? No 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the digest? No ---- PRESENT: MR. ASHIT MALIK, ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT. MR. NITIN GROVER, ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT NO.2. MR. VARUN KATYAL, ADVOCATE FOR X-OBJECTOR-RESPONDENT NO.3. K.KANNAN, J.(ORAL) Both the appeals are connected, one at the instance of of the claimant and another at the instance of the owner against the liability cast on him. The appeal is for making the insurance company liable for the damage to the vehicle in the case where under a package policy the liability of the insurance company was unlimited and not merely `6000/- as statutorily provided under Section 147(2). While determining the compensation of `78,350/-, the Tribunal had awarded `6000/- to be paid by the insurer and directed the owner-insured to pay the balance. Having X-OBJECTIONS No.76-CII of 2010 & -2- FAO No.3569 of 2009 regard to the specific terms and conditions of the policy providing for an unlimited liability, the liability for the insurance company could not have been restricted to merely `6000/-. 2. The award of the Tribunal is modified and a right of enforcement of the award as determined by the Tribunal shall be against the insurance company. The appeals are disposed of in the light of above. January 10, 2011 (K.KANNAN) Gulati JUDGE