IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4597 of 2009 Shambhu Kumar Paswan, son of Shri Yugeshwar Paswan, resident of village Chak Daulat, P.S. Ujiyarpur, District- Samastipur ………. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, patna 2.The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna 3.The District Magistrate, Samastipur 4.The District Superintendent of Education, Samastipur 5.The Block Development Officer, Sarairanjan, Samastipur 6.The Block Education Extension Officer, Sarairanjan, Samastipur 7.The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat, Gangapur, Block Sarairanjan, District- Samastipur 8.The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Gangapur, Block Sarairanjan, District- Samastipur 9.Shri Chandeshwar Mahto, son of Shri Ramdeo, presently posated as Panchayat Teacher, Newly created Primary School, Mubarakpur Gram Panchayat Gangapur, Block Sarairanjan, District- Samastipur ……………. Respondents ----------- 2. 11/10/2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of the Appellate Authority is cryptic and the appeal of the petitioner was rejected in one sentence holding that the petitioner’s appointment by Block Development Officer was not valid in law. He submits that in his appeal petitioner had clearly stated that he was appointed on the basis of proceeding of the employment agency and the proceeding book contains the signature of the Mukhiya also. Since in the memo of appeal filed by the 2 petitioner, there is mention of some proceeding book and signature of Mukhiya on the same, the Appellate Authority, in all propriety, should have called for the records and should have verified the same before rejecting the claim of the petitioner. Writ application was filed on 9.4.2009. However, till today, no counter affidavit has been filed. In the circumstances, this writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the Appellate Authority. If such a representation is filed within one month from today, the Appellate Authority shall reconsider his case and examine the relevant proceedings and records, pursuant to which petitioner claims his appointment, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law preferably within two months from the date of filing of such representation. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)