[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 438 OF 2007 Channappa Sidhanna Karkal ..Appellant V/s The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Mr.V.V. Purwant, Advocate for the appellant. Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh, APP for the State. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 3RD MAY, 2007. DATE : 3RD MAY, 2007. DATE : 3RD MAY, 2007. P.C. . Heard Mr. Purwant, learned Counsel for the appellant and Mrs. Deshmukh, learned APP for the State. 2. Admit. (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) [2] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 543 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 438 OF 2007 Channappa Sidhanna Karkal ..Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Mr.V.V. Purwant, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh, APP for the State. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 3RD MAY, 2007. DATE : 3RD MAY, 2007. DATE : 3RD MAY, 2007. P.C. . Heard Mr. Purwant, learned Counsel for the applicant and Mrs. Deshmukh, learned APP for the State. 3. The applicant was convicted for the offence punishable under section 498A r/w section 34 of IPC and was sentenced R.I. for three years and to pay fine of Rs.500/-. He has preferred the appeal challenging the conviction and sentence. The appeal is admitted. By this application, he seeks bail pending final hearing and disposal of the appeal. [3] 4. The applicant was on bail during the trial and even after conviction the trial Court suspended execution of substantive sentence of imprisonment under section 389 of Cr.P.C. There is nothing to show that he has misused bail during the trial. 5. Therefore, applicant is hereby granted bail pending appeal, on same terms and conditions as before the trial Court subject to his furnishing fresh bail bonds and depositing fine amount. (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.)