IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO : 15977 of 2003 Between: Shaik Yakoob Ahmed, S/o.Late Shaik Mohammed, R/.o. 45, Nawroji Road, Chetput, Chennai. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State Bank of Hyderabad, Warangal Main, J.P.N. Road, Warangal. 2 Union of India, through its Secretary, (Legal Department), New Delhi. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to invoke its extra ordinary jurisdiction Under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India by issuing appropriate writ more particularly in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writs, declaring the action of the respondent including the notice dt. 4-2-2003 issued U/s. 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the principles of natural justice and also by declaring the provision U/s. 13(2) and Sec. 13(4) and Sec. 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002 as ultra virus, contravening Art. 14 and laconic and not applicable against the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.BANKATLAL MANDHANI Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : ORDER: (Per Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J _________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J Date:27.07.2009 sj