1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Civil Application No.4944 Of 2010 In Writ Petition No.100 Of 2008 Balasaheb S/o Dattatraya Kale. .. Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra And Others. .. Respondents. -------- Shri. S.B. Talekar, Advocate for applicant. Shri. K.B. Choudhari, Additional Government Pleader for respondents No.1. Shri. B.K. Patil, holding for Shri. Hemant Surve, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. Shri. A.M. Phule, holding for Shri. D.V. Soman, Advocate for respondent Nos.5,8,10,11 and 14. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE: 27th APRIL 2010 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2 2) We have perused the order passed by this Court dated 31st January 2008. 3) The learned counsel appearing for the applicant Shri. S.B. Talekar submits that, next conference would be held at Sangli in the month of April / May 2010. The counsel submits that the applicant had to move this Court in view of the ambiguity created due to the communication dated 22nd January 2009 made by the Under Secretary, School Education and Sports Department, to the Director of Education (Primary), Maharashtra State Pune. In clause 9 of the communication it has been mentioned that the teachers who would be attending the conference their absence would be treated as "Sarvasadharan Raja". 3 4) In the light of the order passed earlier by this Court, for the next year conference, which is said to be held in the month of April/May 2010, we observe that, the teachers, who will attend the conference, their absence would be treated as casual leave under the orders of this Court. In the light of the order passed by us the Government may consider the import of the communication dated 22nd January 2009. 5) The civil application is disposed of. Authenticated copy be given to the Additional Government Pleader. Sd/- Sd/- (A.V. POTDAR, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ ca.4944.10