1 Lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.6 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2 OF 2010 Rama Samy Palani Samy : Petitioner versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai : Respondents. And M/s.Exclusive Fibres Pvt. Ltd. : Applicant. Mr. Mehul Shah i/by Bharat Joshi for the Petitioner Ms. V S Gharpure for the Respondent/BMC Mr. Rajeev Agarwala Applicant in person present. CORAM : J N PATEL & C L PANGARKAR, J DATED : 23rd FEBRUARY 2010 P.C. 1. Heard. This chamber summons is taken out by the Applicant for adding him as a party respondent to the present petition. It is his contention that he has direct interest in the subject matter of the Petition. There are civil proceedings, pending between the parties in respect of the same terrace which is the subject matter of the petition. 2 2. On the other hand it is the contention of the Petitioner that the Petitioner challenges notice issued by the Respondent/Corporation. But the petitioner does not dispute that the civil litigations are pending between the parties. 3. In the given facts and circumstances, the applicant is a proper and necessary part. We therefore incline to allow the chamber summons in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. Chamber summons is disposed of. Petition to come up for admission on 29th March 2010. Applicant wants to file reply affidavit. He may do so on or before the next date. (J N Patel, J) (C L Pangarkar, J)