IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER MONDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2008 / 21ST ASWINA 1930 Cont.Case(C).No.1339 of 2008(S) ---------------------------------------------------------- ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.25171 OF 2006 DATED 10.04.2007, AS MODIFIED BY JUDGMENT IN W.A.NO.1697/2007 DATED 23/05/2008. .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER NO.2:- ---------------------------------------------- DR.SHAMLA PADIYATH, AGED 37 YEARS, "SHABNAM" PADIYATH, KAVIL WEST, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.3:- ---------------------------------------------------- SRI.P.C.BINOY, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY STANDING COUNSEL FOR P.S.C. SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS. THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:- H.L.Dattu,C.J. & A.K.Basheer,J. --------------------------------------------- Cont.Case (C).No.1339 of 2008-S -------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 13th October, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu,C.J. In this contempt petition, the complainant alleges, that, the respondent has wilfully and deliberately disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this Court in W.P.(C).No.25171 of 2006 dated 10.04.2007, as modified by the judgment in W.A.No.1697 of 2007 dated 23.05.2008. (2) While disposing of the Writ Appeal, a Bench of this Court had issued certain directions to the respondent. (3) After receipt of the certified copy of the judgment in W.A.No.1697 of 2007, the respondent has initiated all necessary steps to comply with the orders and directions issued in the aforesaid appeal. (4) It appears, certain persons, who are aggrieved by the action of the respondent in complying with the orders and directions issued by this Court in W.A.No.1697 of 2007, have filed petitions before this Court and this Court had granted interim stay of the action of the respondent. Cont.Case (C).No.1339 of 2008 - 2 - (5) In the backdrop of the aforesaid scenario, we cannot be saying that the respondent has either wilfully or deliberately disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this Court in W.A.No.1697 of 2007. (6) In view of the above, for the present we need not have to take cognizance of this contempt petition filed by the complainant. Therefore, the proceedings are dropped for the present. Ordered accordingly. H.L.Dattu Chief Justice A.K.Basheer Judge vku/-