Crim. Appln.(APL)No.133 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.133 OF 2011 SATISH GUNAJI DOD AND OTHERS VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri J. B. Kasat Advocate for the applicant. Shri P. V. Bhoyar, APP for the respondent State. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 08TH MARCH 2011. 1. Heard Learned Advocate for the applicant. 2. According to learned Advocate for the applicant, the complaint is based on no evidence. 3. Lack of evidence is not the ground on which the First Information Report can be quashed. It is not disputed that the description of offence contained in the First Information Report fits into commission of offence. Therefore, no indulgence is required or permissible. Crim. Appln.(APL)No.133 of 2011 2 4. Application has no merit and is rejected. Judge |muley|