IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2010 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 12572 of 2010(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SUBAIDA, W/O.LATE KOCHUPAREED, C.C.5/1363, NEW ROAD, MATTANCHERRY, KOCHI-2. BY ADV. SMT.P.M.SWAYAM PRABHA SMT.R.ASALATHA VARMA SRI.ANIL KUMAR M.SIVARAMAN RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KAKKANADU, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE CORPORATION OF KOCHI, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 4. NABEESA, W/O.MUHAMMED, C.C.5/1360, KUDAKUTHUM PARAMBU, NEW ROAD, MATTANCHERRY. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.V.MANU SRI.S.RAMESH BABU, SC FOR R3 SRI.C.M.SURESH BABU, SC FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 12572 OF 2010 (V) ===================== Dated this the 8th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T The issue raised in this writ petition is regarding certain constructions made by the 4th respondent on the western side of the petitioner's property allegedly blocking the air and light available to the petitioner's residential building. It is seen that in respect to the same issue, petitioner has filed OS No.434/09 before the Munsiff's Court, Kochi, in which Ext.P7 commission report also has been submitted. Thus, in respect of a matter which is pending before the Civil Court that the petitioner has resorted to parallel proceedings by filing this writ petition, which again is impermissible. Therefore, writ petition is only to be dismissed and I do so. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp