IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1411 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1411 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1411 OF 2008 Bharatiya Kamgar Sena ..Petitioner versus General Employees Union & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. R. M. Upadhyay for the Petitioner. Mr. S. S. Joshi, AGP, for the Respondent No.1. Mr. A. Y. Sakhare, Sr. Counsel with N. A. Shaikh for the Respondent No. 2. Mr. Pankaj Kawali for the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM : S.B. MHASE & CORAM : S.B. MHASE & CORAM : S.B. MHASE & A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATE : 17TH JUNE, 2008. DATE : 17TH JUNE, 2008. DATE : 17TH JUNE, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard. 2. Perused the Judgment. Petitioner union was already a recognised union. However, its memberships was 445. Out of 445 members, 380 members have resigned from the membership. Thus, the petitioner does not have minimum 30% membership of the employees so as to maintain the recognition. The issue has been rightly decided by the Member, Industrial Court. There is no substance in the matter, it is hereby rejected. (A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.) (A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.) (A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.) (S. B. MHASE, J.) (S. B. MHASE, J.) (S. B. MHASE, J.)