./f^ \ 1 . ^^.aiEisa. /&.'%° '^^•y HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER RESPONDENTS WRTT PETmON (C) No. 669 of2009 Mahendra Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Lilaru Sigh Sahu, aged about 26 years, R./o Village Uria Tehsil & District Durg, C.G. VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Dqpartmeiit of Education, D.K.S. Bhawaii, Maatralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Publie Infonnation OfGcer, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan. Mantralava, Raipur(C.G.) 3. Chhattisgarh laformation Commission, Shaiikar Na^r, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETmONVNDES. ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTmJTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satlsh K. Asnfliotri. J. Present: Shri Satyendra Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashatik Thakur, Paiiel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on 04th day of February, 2009) 1. Lsamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made two applications before the respondent No. 3 under Right to Infonnation Act, 2005 with requisite fee seeking certain mfonnation. No cognizance has beentaken as on date. 2. Be that as it may, the petitioner may make a fresh application by way of reminder so that the Commission i.e. ths respondent No. 3 can take cognizaace ofthe matter as eai'ly as possible. 3. In view ofthe foregoing, tiiis petition staiids disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1