IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 24th Day of April 2008 II Bail Application No. 28 of 2008 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Jaswant @ Jasvinder, S/o Sri Jagtar, R/o Village Banusee, P.S. Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar. ……Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …..Opposite party Arising out of Case Crime NO. 325 of 2006 Under Sections: 395, 397, 223, 224, 225 of I.P.C. & 29 Police Act, Police Station: Kotwali, Roorkee, District: Haridwar. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard Sri D.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri H.C. Pujari, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. Applicant Jaswant @ Jasvinder, who is in jail in connection with Case Crime No. 325 of 2006, relating to offences punishable Under Sections 395, 397, 223, 224, 225 of I.P.C. and one punishable under Section 29 of Police Act, has sought his release on bail, by means of this second bail application. The first bail application was rejected on merits on 16.03.2007, after hearing the parties. It is a case relating to dare devil act of freeing five under trial prisoners by road hold up. Also, arms of the accompanying police guards were looted. It is argued on behalf of the applicant that neither the applicant is named in the First Information Report nor any identification parade has taken place. It is further argued that no recovery has been made from the applicant. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, since the nature of the offence is grave, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the applicant. Therefore, the second bail application is also rejected. (Prafulla C.Pant, J.) Dt. 24.04.2008 NS