IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 56 OF 2008 THE PROPRIETOR, M/S. PEEDIKAYIL AGRIC AGENCIES ... Petitioner Versus VRL LOGISTIC LIMITED THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER AMARKANT AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Ryan Menezes, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. C. A. Coutinho, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 22nd September, 2008 P.C.:- Heard. Mr. Ryan Menezes, learned Counsel on behalf of the Applicant and Mr. C. A. Coutinho, learned Counsel on behalf of Respondent No.1. Mr. Menezes has placed reliance on CBI v. State of Gujarat((2007) 6 SCC 156) in support of the contention that this revision can be preferred to this Court and ought to be entertained by this Court. There can be no two opinions that revisional jurisdiction has been concurrently conferred on the Court of Sessions and the High Court. In the light of Order passed today in Criminal Revision Application No.30/2008 in which Mr. Menezes also appears, this revision petition shall be returned to the Applicant within the period of four weeks and who shall present it to the Court of Sessions within a further period of two weeks and if presented, the same shall be disposed of by the learned Sessions Judge as a revision in accordance with law. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.