IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1433 of 2011 RANJEET RAI, SON OF SRI JIMDAR RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 23.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Sakara P.S. Case No. 343 of 2010 registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It would appear from perusal of the impugned order that neither petitioner is named in the First Information Report nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. It would further appear that the name of this petitioner came in the confessional statement of co-accused Md. Kalam and furthermore, in course of investigation, two witnesses have also named the petitioner but it is absolutely clear from the impugned order that the aforesaid witnesses are hearsay witnesses and not the eye- witnesses of the alleged occurrence. In view of the aforesaid circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with above stated Sakara P.S. Case No. 343 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )