IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16976 of 2010 JAILOR YADAV @ JAILER YADAV, Son of Bachoo Yadav, r/o village- Harhar, P.S. Kako, District- Jehanabad.................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR...................................Opposite Party. ----------- 3. 02.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail in a case registered under Sections 364/34 of the I.P.C. and subsequently Section 302 of the I.P.C. was also added. It is alleged that the petitioner was last seen in the company of the victim. Moreover, the dead body was recovered from the field of the petitioner. It is submitted that there was land dispute between the deceased and the petitioner and there was no motive against the petitioner. Moreover none has seen the occurrence. It is submitted that there is no eye witness to the occurrence. In view of the fact that the petitioner has been last seen in the company of the victim and the informant was being chased by the petitioner and other accused persons when she went to make enquiry and dead body was recovered from the field of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The bail application of the petitioner is rejected. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)