IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRL.P.No.10779 OF 2010 Between:- Yeramati Srinivas and 2 others …Petitioners A n d Yeramati Sri Rajitha @ Pujitha and another …Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRL.P.No.10779 OF 2010 ORDER: The first respondent-de facto complainant is present. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners/A-1 to A-3 handed over three demand drafts for Rs.3 lakhs, Rs.2 lakhs and Rs.1 lakh respectively to the first respondent as per the terms of the compromise and the first respondent stated that she received the amount in lieu of permanent alimony. She further stated that she is not interested in prosecuting the case any more. 3. As the matter between the parties has been settled amicably out of Court and the parties have entered into compromise as per the terms set out therein and the first respondent-complainant received all the amounts due to her in terms of the settlement and as she is not interested in pursuing the complaint given by her, it is considered that no useful purpose would be served by continuing the criminal proceedings against the petitioners/A-1 to A-3. 4. In the circumstances, further proceedings against the petitioners/A-1 to A-3 in P.R.C.No.25 of 2009, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Nidadavole, West Godavari District, are liable to be quashed and they are accordingly quashed. 5. In the result, the criminal petition is disposed of. _____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 12th November, 2010 Lrkm.