r ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAT'URE AT BILASPUR M.C.C. N0. a\ f2006^ IN THE MATTER OF:- M..C.C. No.34472006 BETWEEN . Applicants: . Smt. Anita Sharma VERSUS Non-applicant: Anand Mohan Sharraa APPLICANT ^ \{/^ Smt. Anita Sharma, wife of Shri ..•"' Anand Mohan Sharma, daughter of Pareraeshwar Dayal Sharma, aged about 43,years, resident of Azad Chowk, Brahmanpara, •Raipur Anand' Moha.n Sharma, son of Late Shri Vyas Narayan Sharma, aged about 48 years, I.T. Officer, Bank of Maharashtra, De've-ndra Nagar, Raipur, resident of 'Kadambari Housing Society, Dhamdha Road, Durg. ^" ' • , APPLICATOIN FOR RESTORATION OF THE PETITION RESPONDENT XI-HC-78 sn^Tqn'f^TR; aan'aiI^Tstiii'ti 3^-qOTcW, »Tfltl'IC,i»ICII*fy .N\.(^C,^(o. gol/^o^ ^I+IMI aiHlcb •^2()0 Y ^ 3<1^1 Msl«b (licltd's"<.'ir) ?TtITWtri?cT3TI^T 05.01.2007 Shri M.L, Saket, counse|l None for the responden^. Heard. This application (M.C.| restoration of M.C.C. No. 34 under Section 24 of the Code supported by affidavit ofthe c( This inatter was disinij the Meinbers of fhe Chlis fheinselves froia fhe Court against fhe action of ttie Statej as Law Officers of the State. Learaed counsel for hundred cases were disnussed Division Bench of fhis Court passiug a deteuiled order date<j about all fhe cases, which w^ certain. conditions. His niay also be given to this case.l The prayer appears to bi The order of Division perused. For fhe reasons stated passed by the Division Ben| «bl'!|l<'l4)-lt||t|<'t1'fffeIA<ft'tril< ^sri^Tsn^T for the appUcaut. ;. No. 801/2006) has been filed for 4/2006, which was aa application )f Civfl Procedure. This application is >unsel himself. ised in default on 23.8.2006, when ittisgarh Higli' Court Bar abseutaiL proceediags as a mark of protest Goverament in appointmg outsiders [he appUcaat sutinuts fhat about iu default on fhe said date aad fhe t, headed by The Chief Justice, by 6dl October, 2006, restored ahnost ^re disinissed by the said Bench,ou is that the sinular treatment submission geniune. Be|ach passed in M.C.C. No. 495/2006 i|a the order dated 6th October, 2006 =h m M.C.C. No. 495/2006, this -^-—--— l-i-ri XI-HC-78 3^'^TPTRTO', (SiTnM'l®,Ridltfy ^•C.C.No, 3o^/2_^6 ^ HI+1WI sh*11<sb ^ 200 3ii^<l 4a<»> (>ic<t3'!"<ff) 3T(^rT^rf?:lW (RTSlI^TsblW Ni .. ^ ?i<nwflf?cT3n^T 2_ appUcation is allowed on the have been nientioned in the The dismissed M.C.C. N< origiaal uuiriber on the reasons l*--^M.c.<: .^o-^J^ Isame tenns aud conditions, which afdresaid order. 4>. 344/2006 shaUberestored^to^its stated in fhe order. Sd/- '^•^ <Di<<Fci<fl'f iiH<-iTfftetA<Rit<ii< ^sri^Tsn^T Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge y-'v^ 7:v~~ >;'i t_^ C"F h-^- K"i ^{ <- C. o. ^— ^ t' o9- ^ ? ^o^x^^; ^i- Ca^- (^^^^[^-^[^ ^•I'o^