IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 19TH KARTHIKA 1932 CRP.No. 2282 of 1995(E) ----------------------- RCA.8/1993 of RENT CONTROL APPELALTE AUTHORITY ,KOLLAM RCP.13/1989 of RENT CONTROL COURT, KARUNAGAPPALLY .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S)/1ST RESPONDENT/1ST CR.PETITIONER: --------------------- G.THANKAMMA, PALOORU VEETTIL, KOTTAKKUPURAM MURI, ADINADU VADAKKE, KULASEKHARAPURAM VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. N.RAGHAVA KURUP, VILAYIL VEEDU, KADATHOOR MURI, THAZHAVA VILLAGE. REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER N.SANKARA KURUP, (2ND RESPONDENT HEREIN) 2. N.SANKARA KURUP, CHENGANTHOTTATHIL VEEDU, KOTTAKKUPURAM MURI, ADINADU VADAKKE, KULASEKHARAPURAM VILLAGE. ADV. SRI.P.G.PARAMESWARA PANICKER, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.P.GOPAL THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. ------------------------ C.R.P.No. 2282 OF 1995 ------------------------ Dated this the 10th day of November, 2010 O R D E R Pius C.Kuriakose, J. The first respondent passed away as early as on 8.1.2004. Even though a memo to that effect was filed by the learned counsel for the respondents as early as on 9/7/2004, till date no steps have been taken by the petitioner to implead the legal heirs of the deceased first respondent. The 2nd respondent is only a power of attorney holder of the first respondent. The power of attorney cannot subsist any longer. Under these circumstances, this civil revision petition stands dismissed as abated against the necessary party. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE dpk WPC.No. 2 PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. ------------------------ C.R.P.No. 2282 OF 1995 ------------------------ O R D E R 10th November, 2010