IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7115 of 2008 Date of decision: 2.3.2009 Puneet Kamra ...Petitioner Versus Ms. Neha Kamra ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate for the respondent. S.D.ANAND, J. The only grievance of the petitioner as culled out from the petition is that the learned Trial Court granted an inordinately long date for disposal of his plea to visit his child who is putting up with his estranged wife. It is apparent from the record that the learned Trial Court did indeed grant an inordinately long date for issuance of the notice of the application to the opposite party. On consensual basis, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Court to dispose of the relevant application on 6.3.2009 itself. In order to enable the respondent to file a counter, a copy of the relevant application has been supplied to the learned counsel today. He states that the counter would be filed before the learned Trial Court on the date fixed and both the learned counsel further agree that matter would be argued on that very day. March 02, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge