1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No.3330 of 2008. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|_______________________________________ 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner is Sarpanch of the village and challenges delineation of land S.No.117 from purview of the inquiry under provisions of the Hyderabad Atiyat Inquiries Act, 1952, as shown in the judgment rendered by the learned designated Member of Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in Revision Petition No.17/B/95/P/ATY Parbhani. The MRT held that S.No.117 is not the property of Devasthan and as such is liable to be excluded from part of Gat No.135. The petitioner was not a party before the MRT. The petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate proceedings if he is aggrieved due to such delineation of the land S.No.117. If he wants to claim that the said land is also part and parcel of the Devasthan Trust then he may take appropriate proceedings separately. No opinion on merits is expressed. The petition is dismissed as it involves disputed questions of facts. (V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) Dt.10.07.2009. asp/office/wp3330.08.