THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.24538 of 2011 Date: 13.09.2011 Between: Nutalapati Ramu and another. … Petitioners and The Revenue Divisional Officer, Khammam Division, Opp: Bus Stand, Khammam Town, Khammam District. … Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.24538 of 2011 ORDER : Heard Sri Bollam Lingaiah Yadav, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing for the respondent. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Khammam Division, Khammam District, the respondent herein, issued a notification No.C2/249/2010, dated 2.8.2011, calling for applications for appointment of Fair Price Shop dealers in respect of seven shops in different villages of Khammam Rural Mandal. According to the petitioners, the said notification was challenged by some of the existing Fair Price Shop dealers, who are said to have filed an appeal before the Government challenging bifurcation of shops and this Court by orders dated 17.8.2011 and 24.8.2011 in W.P.No.23155 of 2011 and W.P. 23799 of 2011, respectively, stayed the operation of the said notification relating to only five shops pending disposal of the appeal and directed the Government to dispose of the appeal within a time frame. The grievance of the petitioners is that even though the notification insofar as the other two shops, namely Shop No.7008 of Tallampadu-I Village and Kondapuram Village has not been stayed, the respondent is not considering the applications of the petitioners under the guise of the orders of this Court staying the notification. The petitioners, therefore, have filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent to issue separate notification for Thallampadu-I and Kondapuram Villages and to take further action for appointment of Fair Price Shop dealers in respect of the said shops. 3. Admittedly, no material is placed before this Court to adjudicate the issue whether the stay orders granted by this Court in the above writ petitions cover the aforesaid shops. It appears that the petitioners did not even make any representation bringing the said fact to the notice of the respondent. 4. In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to permit the petitioners to make a representation along with relevant material to the respondent and on such representation, the respondent is at liberty to consider the same and take appropriate decision in the matter in accordance with law. 5. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is dismissed at the admission stage. No order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI 13.09.2011. Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.24538 of 2011 13.09.2011 (Msr)