THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.P.No.28351 of 2011 ORDER (Per Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 being wife and children of the petitioner-husband, filed M.C.No.1 of 2006 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sidhouth and the same was allowed awarding a sum of Rs.2,000/-per month to them. Respondent No.2 filed a revision in Crl.R.P.No.36 of 2008 seeking enhancement of maintenance. Certain civil and criminal cases were also pending between the spouses. Finally, both the spouses voluntarily compromised the matter in terms of the compromise and all the matters were placed before the Lok Adalat Bench, District Legal Services Authority, Kadapa (for short ‘the Authority’), who in turn passed an award dated 19.02.2010 in LAC No.70 of 2010, in terms of compromise. Now, the contention of the petitioner-husband is that having received a sum of Rs.7 lakhs and drawing a sum of Rs.8,000/-per month from his salary respondent No.2-wife is not coming forward for divorce by mutual consent. Hence, he filed the present writ petition seeking a mandamus to declare term No.9 of the award passed by the Lok Adalat Bench, as unconscionable and to direct respondent No.1 to address a letter directing the 5th respondent to stop attaching the salary of the petitioner to the tune of Rs.8,000/-per month. 2. Inasmuch as the petitioner voluntarily entered into compromise with respondent No.2-wife in terms of the compromise and accordingly, the Lok Adalat Bench by the award impugned recorded the compromise in terms thereof, we are not inclined to agree with the contention of the petitioner by interfering with the award impugned. There are no merits in this writ petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to invoke suitable remedies available under law. No order as to costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J Date:20.10.2011 sj