Crl. Misc. No. M-5017 of 2011 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-5017 of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 16.02.2011 Daljit Kaur ..........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate for Mr. B.D. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. Crl. Misc. No. 9269 of 2011 Application is allowed as prayed for. Crl. Misc. No. M-5017 of 2011 The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of Daljit Kaur for issuing directions to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect her life and liberty on the ground that threat is being given by respondent No.4 and no action is being taken against him. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that FIR No. 241 under Section 325 IPC was registered on 16.10.2010 against respondent No.4 but till today no action has been taken against him and he is threatening the petitioner after the registration of the FIR but learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to show as to when and in what manner the threat was given. Although as alleged the petitioner has made representation (Annexure P-3) to the Commissioner of Police, Crl. Misc. No. M-5017 of 2011 (O&M) (2) Amritsar but nothing has been mentioned in the petition that how this representation was given and there is nothing on the record to show that whether this representation was actually made or not. In view of the facts mentioned above, no direction can be issued to the official respondents. Petition is dismissed accordingly. However, the petitioner can make a representation to the concerned Police Station for her grievance and if such representation is made, the same would be decided by the concerned Police official in accordance with law. February 16, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE