:1: :1: :1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 510 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s Orders Orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.SM.Railkar, Adv. for the petitioners. None for the respondents. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 29TH FEBRUARY,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. Mr.Railkar, appearing for the petitioner states that although the matter is shown under the Caption "Notices not received back", yet the controversy in the present petition is capable of being resolved in revisional jurisdiction of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal which has now stood revived and re-established. The petitioner, therefore be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty :2: :2: :2: to file a Revision Application before the MRT. The petitioner states that the Revision Application is already filed. 2. In such circumstances, the petition can be disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to raise all pleas in respect of all contentions raised in the Writ Petition and even apply for interim reliefs. 3. To enable the petitioner to apply for interim reliefs before the MRT in the pending Revision Application, the ad-interim order granted by this court to continue for four weeks. ********