IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 391 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 391 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 391 OF 2006 Lata Suresh jethani.......Petitioner Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors......Respondents Mr.Lilani Shah for the Petitioner Mr.D.H. Mehta with Mrs. A.K. Savla for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. R.A. Shaikh i/b.S.D. Mishra for Respondent No.3. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. DATE: DATE: DATE: 18TH AUGUST,2006 18TH AUGUST,2006 18TH AUGUST,2006 P.C. . Consent terms have been filed between petitioner and respondent No.3 in the matter of development rights. In view of the consent terms petitioner does not claim any relief against Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. 2. In the light of that consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. Petition disposed of in terms of consent terms. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.). V.MOHTA, J.). V.MOHTA, J.).