IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12307 of 2011 Ramjee Tanti, S/O-Late Basuki Tanti Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- For the Petitioner :-Ambika Bhagat & Kamal Kr. Sinha For the State :- S.N. Shukla A.P.P. 03 23.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named in the first information report with direct allegation of making firing on the informant as a result of which informant sustained fire arm injury on his back. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that according to prosecution case itself, the alleged occurrence took place on 28.08.2009 whereas the Ferdbeyan of the informant was recorded on 16.09.2009 i.e. much after the alleged occurrence and no explanation of the aforesaid delay has been given in the prosecution case. It is also contended by him that enmity between the petitioner and informant is admitted in the Ferdbeyan of the informant itself. Although, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer but he could not succeed to explain the delay in lodging the first information report. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Munger in connection with Sessions Trial No. 811 of 2010 arising out of Kashim Bazar P.S. Case No. 154 of 2009. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)