HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 579 OF 2000. PETITION NO. 579 OF 2000. PETITION NO. 579 OF 2000. --------------------------------l------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda l of Coram, appearances, Court’s l Orders or directions and l Registrar’s orders. l Court’s or Judges’ Order --------------------------------i------------------------------ Mr. P.M.Patel for the petitioner. Ms. M. Kajale for the respondent nos. 1 & 2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S. B. MHASE & S. B. MHASE & S. B. MHASE & Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJJJ JJ. DATE: DATE: DATE: March 4, 2008. March 4, 2008. March 4, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. Notice dated January 2000 demanding a sum of Rs. 9,38,151.00 plus notice charges has been issued by the Tahasildar in the capacity of the recovery of dues of the workers. The said proceeding is initiated under section 267 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The said notice has been challenged in the present petition. As provided in the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code the petitioner can approach to the Tahasildar and explain as to why the amount should not be recovered from her. Furthermore, if any order is passed by the Tahasildar the same is appealable under the Code. In view of the fact that the alternate remedy is available to the petitioner we refrain to entertain the petition. In the circumstances, petition is dismissed. Stay, if any, is hereby vacated. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.) J.) J.) (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, J.) J.) J.) sachin/2008/VKT/..