IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.212 of 2010 Date of Decision: January 25, 2010 Rajinder .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Rajni .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Navneet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition is directed against Order dated 4.1.2010. The order mentions that respondent (petitioner in this petition) availed many effective opportunities and yet did not file reply. Under these circumstances, defence of the respondent has been ordered to be struck off. I find that an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was filed by Smt. Rajni, respondent. The petitioner has not placed on record various orders passed by the Family Court to show that sufficient opportunities had not been granted to the petitioner to bring his Crl. Revision No.212 of 2010 [2] defence. Although application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was filed in July 2009, even reply was not filed till the passing of the impugned order. Learned counsel for the petitioner simply says that one more opportunity may be given. The number of opportunities already availed is not even indicated in the petition. The reason for not filing reply has also not been given out in the petition. I find no justification to allow more opportunity to the petitioner to bring his defence. I find no legal infirmity in the impugned order. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) January 25, 2010 JUDGE avin