1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1002 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1017 OF 2010 East India Cotton Manufacturing Co. Ltd. .. Applicants. V/s. Ashok Textile Mills .. Respondents. Mr. A.G. Damle for the Applicants. Mr. T.S. Ingale for the Respondents. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 17TH AUGUST, 2010. P.C. 1. By separate order we have already admitted the appeal preferred by the applicants against the decision of the trial Court dated 1st September, 2009 and the stay of operation is prayed in the present application. Considering the fact that the applicants company is before BIFR and the Scheme under the Said Act is already being implemented, the question of directing the applicants to deposit the amount specified by the trial Court by way of money decree in favour of the respondent cannot be ordered in view of Section 22 of the Act of 1986. The fact that the scheme is implemented as stated by Counsel for the applicants company. It would be different 2 matter if the respondents are able to produce some positive documents to suggest that the scheme has lapsed or no more in force. In the circumstances, interim relief as prayed for in prayer clause (a) is granted, which shall operate during the pendency of the appeal or such order to be passed at a later stage. Application disposed of accordingly. (A.A.SAYED,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)