IN THE HXGH COURT OE- JUDIC&TUBE ATBIIASPUB, CHHWE'EISOSRH WP Nofl OF 2001 PETITIONER ..>^y' -<.^w'~ t^.»-'' Q\- ''•"'^''••"''-'9--~"" ^.^^-; ^^ v^!i& .A"^.» " •Firm H/S Surajmal Mohanlal Through Proprietor Gulab Chand Agrawal, aged about 40 years, S/0 Mohan Lal Agrawal R/0 Street No. 2, Nemichand Gali, Ganjpara Raipur. District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPOHDBRTS vl.The State Oi Chhattisgarh Through Upper Commercial Tax O.E'.ficer, Raipur Circle-2 Raipur Chhattisgarh 2-Divisional Depu-ty eomiid:ss±on-ex-o.t Commercial Tax Raipur (Chhattisgarh) S.Assistant Sales Tax 0-f.ficer Raipur Circle -2 Raipur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UHDER SECTIOH 226/227 QF COHSTITUTIOB OF IBDIA XI-HC-27. sin^iTi I<ptt?h 1^(^ at^tCT ^I^tl ^ 6"-'' 'S^t -<ti<<iw*i, Btilwis, laKni'yy _y...;£'....^...9..;..^:9.0^/'2-0&' *t((Ktl9«*ri«»i """"""""""" 'Wf 200 'te^sf' 3ii^( ^BIRR ^lft? 07.02.2002. Heard Shri Ayaz Naved, ShukSa, Additional Advocate iawyer for the State/ Respondent co^insel for the petitioner and t)r. N.K. with Shri Deep Kesharwani, panel 6enei''al The'petitionsr has in this orders (Annexures P-1 &, P-2) submitted that these orders aside by the 2" respondent - Tax, Raipur and the matter has for fresh consideration. Since the orders (Annexu aside by the 2 respondent and 3r respondent, this petition dismissed as infructuous. c^^fa^l-*tt*^ "^ t^<^ tRit^R, ^E afetH ;m^H t)etition sought for quashing of the p(|ssed by the 3 respondent. It is (f^nnexures P-1 & P-2) have bee set peputy Commissioner of Commercial remanded to the 3'" respondent es P-1 & P-2) have atready been set matter has been remanded to the become infructuous and it is 1he Has Sd/- Chief Justice p^^^&^ ld/ :/"' ^ :