IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.3409/2011 Date of decision: 01.06.2011. Surjit Singh ....................Petitioner v. Punjab State Electricity Board and another .....................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Mr.Vinod Gupta,Advocate for Mr.Jagmohan Ghuman,Advocate for the petitioner. Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral) Proxy counsel for the petitioner states that the arguing counsel has since been appointed on the panel of Punjab State Electricity Board and therefore, cannot pursue this case. He, however, does not dispute that the reliance in the present petition on the provisions of Electricity Supply Act,1948 (for short the 1948 Act) for setting aside the impugned appellate judgement dated 20.11.2010 (P3) and seeking restoration of the order dated 5.5.2008 passed by the learned trial court by relying on Sections 28 and 29 of the 1948 Act is highly misconceived in view of the 1948 Act having been repealed and replaced by Electricity Act,2003. He therefore, is unable to submit with regard to the maintainability of the present revision petition by relying on the provisions of the repealed Act of 1948. He further expresses his inability to withdraw the present petition with permission to file a fresh one in the absence of any authorisation on behalf of the petitioner/plaintiff. In view of the aforesaid undisputed facts, present revision petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner/plaintiff to file a fresh one with correct particulars. 01.06.2011 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge