IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11744 of 2008 Punam Rani, w/o Ramesh Kumar Mehta, resident of village Manjora, P.S. Bihariganj, Block Udakishunganj, District Madhepura……..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Secretary-cum-Commissioner of Human Resources Department of Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Madhepura. 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Madhepura. 5. The District Education Officer, Madhepura. 6. Block Education Extension Officer, Block Udakishunganj, Madhepura. 7. Raj Laxmi Devi, W/o Naresh Poddar, Mukhiya Biri Panchayat Block Udakishunganj, District Madhepura. 8. Secretary of Biri Panchayat, District Madhepura. 9. Block Development Officer of Udakishunganj, District Madhepura. 10. Kalpana Kumar, D/o Late Shyam Kishor Gupta, resident of village & P.S. Bihariganj Ward No.15, District Madhepura…………………………Respondents --------------- 2 26.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. The order dated 10.07.2007 as contained in Annexure-4 was passed by the Block Development Officer while exercising the power of the Appellate Authority, in favour of the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that the same is not being implemented by the Mukhiya and Panchayat Secretary of the concerned Panchayat. 2 If that is so and if the order is still in operation and is not under challenge before this Court in any proceeding or before any higher authority, it is the Block Development Officer who has to see that his orders are implemented by the Mukhiya and Panchayat Secretary, failing which the B.D.O. is competent to take action against them in compliance of his orders. This Court need not pass any order for the same. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)