^ Q^C^ ^ ;^^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. 2-967?- /2003 Petitioner : AJAY KUMAR JAIN, aged about 26 years, S/o Late Shri Ramesh Chandra Jain R/o C/o Shri Deepchand Kamal Kumar Jain, Cloth Stores, Parade Chowraha, Lashkar Road, Bhind (M.P.) •••'-^<\v".'^?^.<**> ^^i^" ^9 Respondents ( VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Department of Agriculture D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Directorate of Agriculture, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Deputy Director, Agriculture, Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Joint Director, Agriculture (Establishment), Directorate of Agriculture, Raipur (C.G.) 5. State of Madhya Pradesh, Through Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) 6. Director, Agriculture, Vindhyachal Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) -2- 7. Joint Director, Agriculture (Establishment), Directorate of Agriculture, Bhopal (M.P.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. M^ XI-HC-22 3Tr^T^T fsFiwsn^i $^^i<=b ^rfin \., '5"^? ^INi<>l4^ ^T^^S^ [^<ni'H^< ,^...:..^...&h^ WR^I^RT^ 200 '^^ST' 31T^T ^^TW ^rf^T 29-9-2003 petiljioner f^e Heard Shri Bhaskar By this petition f| Constitution of India, the respondent No.2 to conside^ appointing him on compassionb The case of the Chandra Jain was an employ4< of AA,P. and he died on 21 Agricuiture Deveiopment petitjoner moved an app| appointment and in th^ appojntment as he was the Higher SecQndary apptication revivlng his eorii^ compassionate ground. No, 2 and uitimateiy alt petiTJoner. ThereafTer videj birector, Agriculture, Agricuiture ftdipur about petitioner. Even the optiong which State he wants the ab PG|yasi ojyasi, eounsel for* the petitioner. Sted under Articies 226/227 of the ^etition^r has sought retef for diracting his case and to pass appropriate order passionhte 9rounid, <=hj4jf^l4lr1 "RTR^if ^ t^Si' 'tf^FFSK '^3:[f^R3:H^T is that h is father iate Shri Ramesh of AgricuIturs bepartment, 0overnment "IQ-98 whib h^ was working as Senior \ After the death of his father,the ication for giving him compassionate ^ h& aiso reque^'r-ed to d&fer hi^ in ciass-XE. However. after passing ^ninoition, the petitioner again moved an ^r request for giving him appointment on |ain objections were nxis^d by respondent the objection^ were removed by the letter dated 21st June 2001, the Deputy intimated the tAdditional Director; t'he removal of thc| objections by the was sought from the petitioner that in >pointment on compassionate ground, The Oftficer m^an'time., stu^ying Exabino^t Certain ftaidarh -ft XI-HC-22 'STT^T'^T ^w sni^T ^HW^tn ^ 1:':1! " ^Q^^l ^'^ r3^[ ^i !^i i<vi^, ^xil^ ^ i <o, f®i<n1^3? 3T|^T "q^^ MTRW WW^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ 200 "Ig'^IT'*^** ^T^T ^T^R'^TT -2^r petJtipner aave his option for nol+iing has been heard fr-om 'fhe respondents. ^Tqferit^ 'RW^Tf "^ fi^ifa^K ^3Tf^R3TI^T the State of Chhattis9arh, ThereGfter, The counset for the p< r^gularly pursuing his ca^e -tttioner submitted that the petitioner is ^for^ the re^pond&nts authorit^ but they are not paying any heed 1jo the request of the petitioner, Hdving heard the lean regard to the facts and circtjmstances of the case, as the petitioner Has cofhp!i&d with a!{ th| compa^^ionate around and ha aiso given option for appointr then the re^pondent^ are no. for compGSSionate appointm&n' In the given situafion, the case of the petitioner f appropriate order within aperi^d of 3 fflonths from The writ petition is disp Parties are entiTled for ied counsei for thc parties and hGving requirements for appointment on removed aii th@ obyections and he has ,ent in the State o"ft Chhattisgarh, even con^idering the case of the petitioner l^spo^hdenT No.2 is directBd to process ^r compassionate appointment and pass ^sedof Gccorcljngly. Con^equ^ntfy, I.A. No. ^S91/2003 al^o stand^ dispo^ed of. ^erTified copy of thls order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge r^^f^