IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43310 of 2008 BINAYAK SINGH, son of Late Harinandan Singh, resident of village Chanda, P.S. Khudwan, District Aurangabad ….Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ….Opposite party ----------- 06/ 11.12.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case, which was initially registered for the offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code, but subsequently charge sheet has been submitted under Sections 392, 120B and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been implicated in this case during the investigation by Umakant Kumar @ Mohan, Surendra Ram and Ram Pravesh Singh when they recorded extra judicial inculpatory confessional statement and they have been admitted to the privilege of bail under orders dated 18.9.2007, Annexure-2 and with reference to the said order, it is submitted that the case of the petitioner is also similar to those, who have implicated him and he be also admitted to the privilege of bail. When such submission was made, this Court called upon the counsel under orders dated 24.11.2008 to inform this Court about the antecedent of the petitioner, in response whereto affidavit has been filed today, wherefrom it appears that this petitioner has criminal record right from the year 1999. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to admit the petitioner to the privilege of bail. His prayer for bail is refused. Petitioner is in jail custody for about one year with 2 effect from 6.2.2008, in the circumstances, it is directed that the case ( Haspura P.S. Case No. 20 of 2007, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad) be committed to the court of Sessions forthwith, if not already committed and thereafter charges framed and trial taken against him and concluded as early as possible, in any case within one year from the date of commitment. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)