: wmmmrt '1; HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETiTiON {S} NO. 6078 OF 2908 Smt. Ammba Bai Dhruve. Wlo Shri Ram Singh Dhruve, aged about 32 years, Profession Teachet, R/o village Amanaia, PS. Borla, Distt. Kabirdham (CG). PETITmNER Versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Panchayat & Gramin Vikas Vibhag, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG}. Collector. Di3tt. Kabirdham (CG). District Education Wcer, Distt. Kabirdham (CG). 4. Biock Educatien Offiser, Borta. Distt. Kabirdham (CG). 5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Borla, Distt. Kabirdham. (Writ iaetition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. P¥e§ent 2 M5 SOT-la Khan. counsel fOI' the petitiOHEI'. Shri Y.S. Thakur. Dy. Adv. General with Ms Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State. Ms Hamida Siddique. counsel for the reepondent No.5. GRAL ORDER (Passed on this 8i“ day of April, 2009) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner eubmits that the petitioner has already been paid saiary as ciaimed in the writ petition. thus nothing survives in this petition on merit. However, learned counsel submite that since the petitioner has suffered on account of delay in making payment of salary, some cost may be awarded. 2) Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and particularly considering the fact that after filing of this petition the salary has been paid to the petitioner in its entirety it is not a case for grant of any cost. 3) Aocordingiy, the petition stands disposed of. . “‘hoi" Saf‘S“ Judge Gowri \ i