BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16157 of 2011 1 RAJA 2 JEYAKUMAR ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VALLIYOOR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT, CR NO. 678/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.A.EBENEZER Advocate For Respondent : M/S. K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as accused and they prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C. for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) I.P.C., in Crime No.678 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. Heard Mr.T.A.Ebenezer, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal Side) would submit in his argument that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, stringent conditions may be imposed for the secured presence of the petitioners. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri and on further condition that the petitioners shall appera before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 13/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NANGUNERI 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VALLIYOOR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT +1. CC to M/S. T.A.EBENEZER Advocate SR.No.43488 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16157 of 2011 Date :13/12/2011 SMA/15.12.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/