INrHE^HIGHjCQUKrOFjCHHAmSGAjRHiB^ Wnt Petition (C) No, 2700 of2008 Petitioner Karthik Kadliakdslinaa, aged about 23 years, S/o Shri K. B. Radhakrishnan, Rall No. 46529, Emollment No. NN-4767, R/o Padinaaabhpur, Dui^, Tali & Distt, Dux^ (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. Pt Ravisliaakar University, Raipiir, Through : Registrar, Pt. Ravishaakar University, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Vice Chan.ceUor, Pt, Ravishanitar Universily, Raipur (C.G,) 3. Principal, Chhatrapati Shivaji Institute of Technology, Durg (C.G.) WRIT PE'I'mON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri V. G. Tamaskar, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri Neeraj Choubey, Advocate Ibr tte rcspoadents No, 1 aad 2, Shri B, D. Guru, Advocate fbr the respoadent No.3. Dr. Indu Anant, Registrar, Pt. Ravishnatear Uiiiversity, Kaipur is present ia person. ORDBR (Passed on this 28th Dsy ofAugust, 200^ 1. With the consent of lesmied counsel appesaing for the parties, fhe matter is heard finaUy. 2, The Registear of the Uxiiversity, present m fhe Coiirt, submits fhat fhe inistake in. not addiag 18 marks, obtaiaed by the petitioner, ia teaeher's assessinent, ia Midticaedia and Animation Lab subject of sixffa semester, 2006 of computer science has been corrected and fbie result has alrcady been declared. The mark-sheet thercof shall be sent to fhe petitioner wifkun a period of seven days froin today. f 5. ff In view of the foregomg, accordmg to leanied counsel appearing fbr ffae petitioner, nofhiag survives ia this inattcr. However, he subiuits ttiat ftie question o< graat of coiapensation niay also be considered. Liberty is reseryed to the petitioner to raise issue for gmnt of coinpensation ia any ofher petition, if so advised, tliat rniay be considered, in accordance with law. In view of the above, the petition is disnri^sed as haviag become mjGructuous. No order asto costs. Tbakur Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge