IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CIVIL REVISION N0. t c?^ / 2004 Applicant ^(Defendant) Deepak Jain S/o Mohanlal Jain, Aged about 31 years, Firm Motilal Battulal, Shastri Chowk, Dhamtari, Dist: Dhamtari-(C.G.) Versus Non Applicants ^•^' ff$^x-" ..^"".^", l..>'<<- ^^.^" ^'•^y ^' ^ ^:^ r' ^" 4. Abhijit Bose S/o Ravindranath Bose, Aged about 54 years, Proprietor Calcutta Photo Studio, Bastar Road, Dhamtari, Post & Dist : Dhamtari-(C.G.) Shri Naveen Patel S/o Late Shri Bakor Bhai Patel, Aged about .38 years, P.D.Company, NearTeer Bidi, Bastar Road, Post & Dist : Dhamtari-(C.G.) 2nd Address Meera Apartment^ Alkapuri Society, Opp : M.K.M.High School, Post Baroda, Dist : Baroda- (Gujrat) Shri Sohanlal Sahu, Process Sur^eyor, Civil Court Dhamtari Shri Tikde, Reader and Clerk, Civil Court, Dhamtari-(C.G.) M\ 5,^ Shri Dhande, Nayab Nazir, Civil Court Dhamtari-(C.G.) Though the Non-Applicants 3, 4 & 5 are the formal parties and have been impleaded as non applicants because they have been made party by Shri Abhijit Bose (Non applicant) of the court below. No relief is being sought against these three non applicants. i ._-^ (2) ^' CIVIL REVISION U/S 1'15 OF THE CODE OF CrSHL PROCEDURE v^ ?eifig.:aggrieved by the impugned order dated 05.03.2004 passed'^ M^<^~Lfl^ ,by Shri K.Vinod Kujur/2nd Civil Judge Class-1 Dhamtari, the applicant prefers this memo of revision on the following facts and grounds amongst others. FA C T S -..—te&^ vj-cq ^iqirt^, tP-alwKa, f6kc)W^( qTRRCT^m^ -r:^"-j^----- ^20( 3TT^9T tRZp (tjcli^dt^) @) 3TT^^TcpTf^Tra? ^WCT^^TfP^iq? Sahu ?;RffWr ;?rf^T 3TT^5T S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K 22.1.2010 Shri PR Patankar, Advbcate Shri Pawan Kesharwal Learned counsel jnstructions, seeks permis^ revision with liberty to ava| available to him under the pr^ Prayer is allowed. Consequently, the rev| the above stated tiberty. No Registry is directed \ impugned order on counsel'^ the same. CPI^IO^I +11^rtV1¥t^<-<Sl^Rrl^l^ ^5'3lR|+l3TT^^T Aaarwal for the appiicant. , Advocate for respondent No. 1 a^pearing for the applicant, on jion of this court to withdraw this |1 appropriate remedy that may be <)visions of law. sion is dismissed as withdrawn with 3rder asto costs. o return the certified copy of the furnishing authenticated true copy of S?l--fo Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge