IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1884 of 2009 DILIP KUMAR @ DILIP RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 7.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This revision application is directed against the order dated 17.11.2009 passed by Sri Mohan Prasad, Additional Sessions Judge II, Vaishali at Hajipur in Cr.Appeal no. 54 of 2009 affirming the order dated 24.8.2009 passed by Sri R.N.Ram, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class cum Juvenile Justice Board, Vaishali at Hajipur in J.J.B.Trial no. 358/09, G.R.No. 1192/09 arising out of Lalganj P.S.Case No. 74/09 by which he rejected the prayer for bail of petitioner. Multiple injuries caused by this petitioner resulted into death of the deceased. Believing chance after release in going in association of known criminal, prayer is refused. The appellate court in the impugned order has observed as follows: “This conduct of appellant is sufficient enough to believe that if he be released on bail, he might go in bad association or in the association of known criminals and exposed him to moral danger. So, his release in that case would certainly defeat the ends of justice.” 2 Every assurance was given by petitioner’s father to have his (petitioner’s) care and control over his act even then petitioner escaped from remand home clearly indicates to conclude that petitioner’s release would defeat the ends of justice though material is lacking in making the observation for rest two grounds. So this much is sufficient for refusal of bail. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)