IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No: 5627 of 2005 Between: Kum. G. Mrunalini Devi, D/o G. Shantaram, Temporarily residing at C/o D. Kumar, H.No. 5-1-169, Old Ghyasmandi Street, Ranigunj, Secunderabad - 500 003. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Secretary, Board of Technical Education & Training, Govt. of A.P. Boorgula Ramakrishna Rao Bhavan, 7th Floor, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Controller of Examinations, Board of Technical Education & Training, Govt. of A.P., Boorgula Ramakrishna Rao Bhavan, 7th Floor, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad. 3 Principal, Kamala Nehru Polytechnic for Women, Exhibition Grounds, Hyderabad-1. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue directions to all the Respondents that: a) to make proper accounting of the attendance particularly the Number of days during which I participated NCC Camps and others at the instance of the 3rd Respondent. b) to treat the attendance as present during the period of various volunteering camps attended by Petitioner including Sick period. c) to permit the Petitioner to Pay the Examination fee and appear for the Examination for II year D.C.E. in order to save One academic year by issuing a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate order or direction and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.N.MADHU (Not present) Counsel for the Respondents 1 and 2: GP FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.3: MR.L.PRABHAKAR REDDY The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER:- When the Writ Petition came up for hearing on 26.04.2005, there was no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner and therefore, it was ordered to be posted on 27.04.2005. Even on this day also there is no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner. It indicates that the writ petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs. __________________________ 06.07.2005 ES To 1 The Secretary, Board of Technical Education & Training, Govt. of A.P. Boorgula Ramakrishna Rao Bhavan, 7th Floor, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Controller of Examinations, Board of Technical Education & Training, Govt. of A.P., Boorgula Ramakrishna Rao Bhavan, 7th Floor, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad. 3 The Principal, Kamala Nehru Polytechnic for Women, Exhibition Grounds, Hyderabad-1. 4 2 CCs to the GP for Technical Education, High Court buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 5 2 CD copies