IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 1ST FEBRUARY 2011 / 12TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 5280 of 2010(H) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- V.D.RAPPAI, SON OF DEVASSY, VADAKKETHALA HOUSE, MANGAT ROAD, EDAPPALLY, KOCHI-24. BY ADV. SRI.ROY CHACKO RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. ROADS AND BRIDGES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF KERALA LTD., 2ND FLOOR, PREETHI BUIDING, M.V.ROAD PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI-25, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. GENERAL MANAGER, ROADS AND BRIDGES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF KERALA LTD., 2ND FLOR, PREETHI BUILDING, M.V.ROAD PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI-25. 3. KUNJU MUHAMMED, S/O.LATE MOHAMMED ALI, PUKKATPANAYAPPILLY HOUSE, MUNDAMPALAM, THRIKKAKARA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. P.K.ABDUL RAZZAK, S/O.KUNU MUHAMMED, PUKKATPANAYAPPALLY HOUSE, MUNDAMPALAM, THRIKKAKARA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.M.VIJAYA KUMAR, SC, RBDCK FOR R2 SRI.P.H.SHAJI (THRIKKAKARA) FOR R3 &4 SRI.A.B.JALEEL FOR R3 & 4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.5280 OF 2010(H) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the Ist day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T By Ext.P3 judgment rendered by this court in WP(c). No.12330/2008 which was filed by respondents 3 and 4 herein, this court directed the first respondent to treat Ext.P6 therein as a show cause notice and decide in the matter after giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned. In this writ petition, the main complaint of the petitioner is that so far the order as directed in Ext.P3 judgment has not been passed. It is with this complaint the writ petition is filed. 2. Although, various contentions have been raised in the counter affidavit filed by the 2nd respondent justifying their stand, it is an admitted position that even as at present orders as directed in Ext.P3 judgment have not been passed. In that view of the matter all that is necessary is that the first respondent should take a decision as directed in Ext.P3 with notice to the petitioner herein and respondents 3 and 4 also, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 3 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. It is made clear that this court has not WPC.No.5280 /2010 :2 : enter into the merits of the controversy and the contentions raised by both parties are left open. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/