IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 203 of 2009. Decided on: 5.3.2010 Balbir Gautam …. Petitioner Versus Oriental Insurance Company and others ….. Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr.Justice V.K.Ahuja, Judge For the petitioner: Mr.Sunny Dhatwalia, , Advocate. For the respondents: Mr.Ashwani K.Sharma, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.(Oral) The writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: “that after taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, writ of mandamus be issued and respondents may kindly be directed to consider the case of the petitioner for the post of Development Officer with due dates with all consequential benefits.” The petitioner has placed reliance on Annexure P-6 letter by the Divisional Manager and Annexure P-9 recommendation by the Senior Divisional Manager. He has filed Annexure P-10 representation before the first respondent. The writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to look into Annexure P-10 representation and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, referring also to the recommendations made, as referred to above and other valid and relevant materials. The orders, as 2 above, shall be passed within three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment by the petitioner. We make it clear that in view of the intervening developments, it will be open to the petitioner to make a supplementary and comprehensive representation alongwith the copy of the judgment before the first respondent. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. March 5, 2010 (V.K.Ahuja) (trs/bss) Judge