Crl. Misc. No. M-21978 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-21978 of 2011 Date of Decision : December 05, 2011 Naresh .... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Ravinder Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar, DAG, Haryana with Mr. Chander Has Yadav, Advocate for the complainant. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Crl. Misc. No. 57082 of 2011 : Allowed as prayed for. Annexures R-1 and R-2 are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Main Case : Accused Naresh has filed this petition for anticipatory bail in case FIR No.732 dated 03.12.2010, under Sections 323, 324, 34 of the Indian Penal Code (in short – IPC) and Sections 3 and 4 of the Scheduled Crl. Misc. No. M-21978 of 2011 2 Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short – the Act), registered at Police Station Jhajjar, District Jhajjar. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. According to the prosecution version, the petitioner inflicted farsa blow on the head of Naveen injured. The petitioner also tried to run over complainant's husband underneath the tractor. There are also allegations relating to offence under Section 3 of the Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that petitioner's co-accused Khazan has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. However, the petitioner cannot claim parity with Khazan because the petitioner inflicted injury with sharp weapon to Naveen on head – a vital part, whereas Khazan had only given fist blows. Counsel for the complainant has also pointed out on the basis of information received under RTI Act that three or four stitches were applied to injured Naveen on his head in Civil Hospital. Keeping in view the allegations against the petitioner, concession of anticipatory bail cannot be extended to him. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed, without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the case. December 05, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE