IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1683 of 2003 Date of Decision: August 26, 2010 Anil Parkash …Petitioner Versus Amarjit Kaur and others. …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH. 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Ms. Harmanpreet Kaur, Advocate, for Ms. Alka Chatrath, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the respondents. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner-tenant states that the petitioner-tenant has purchased the demised premises from the respondents-landlord, hence, petition has rendered infructuous and he does not want to press this petition. C.R. 1993 of 2010 Dismissed as not pressed. August 26, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2