1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R Panna Lal vs. Smt. Manohari Bai S.B.CR. REVISION PETITION NO.1003/2006 Date of Order :: August, 14, 2007 : PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Sudhir Saruparia, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Chhangani, for the respondent. By the instant criminal revision petition under section 397 read with section 401 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has challenged the order dt. 15.5.2006 passed by the Family Court, Udaipur (for short `the family court' hereinafter) granting monthly allowance of maintenance in favour of respondent and against the petitioner at the rate of Rs.600/- per month from the date of order impugned. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the order impugned. 2 The order impugned granting monthly allowance of maintenance at the rate of Rs.600/- from the date of order in my view cannot be said to be erroneous. In any manner, a sum of Rs.600/- per month is hardly an amount to maintain an adult person. The petitioner has not disputed that respondent is his legally wedded wife. The petitioner has contracted a “Nata” marriage to Ganga Bai and therefore, the respondent has a reason to live separately. In the circumstances, therefore, there is no error, illegality or perversity in the order impugned. The revision petition is, therefore, dismissed. [H.R.PANWAR],J. m.asif/-