IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. o WRIT PETITION N0.^) ^U-J-QV 2006 "!>,' PETITIONER ^s^ ^...^.- ^ ^\--'^)-f ..•••'" ^wyL^ -^^&^ -^ /^^- €€-' '^y' ,/'' \\ .^"~ Ramdeen Chandra S/o Shri Loknath Chandra, aged about 45 years, Q.GCtfpation- Rural Agriculture Extension Officer, Marwahi, District BILASPUR C. G I- VERSUS RESPONDENTS .fl' H-/^ '"^. T-^W^. /f ''>;. ^v',._^-'< ;'•' .--y "'.•.-.'i'r-.T.-y^'^ " a " ^''' /-"' ^ ^ 1. State ofChhattisgarh, through: The Secretary, Department of Agriculture, DKS Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Agriculture, Raipur C.G. 3. Joint Director, ^ .. A Agriculture, 01(S5pu<C.G, JWRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE ^ ^- ^L CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN ^^ / •?>• ^ ^ APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF 1 MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTIQNZORDER IN THELIKE NATURE ETC, XI-HC-78 sn^Tqn'f^iNi cWSn^Tshtijcb Oopal •^ ^ 3 qi*<(^l ShHiqi 35T^nqRra', wTny'is, (Siciiyy ^ L^./^.?^^ /^ TR; 200 3ll^l ^aqi (l^lt^si<^<T) WtiTWBfsa'sn^r 24-7-2006 Mr. Rakesh Pandey, coun| Mr.Sumesh Bajaj, Gove| State, on advance copy. Heard. The petitioner, who is ^ °bl'i|li-l41-< WTcff ff fS^S <f»l-S<K ^STf^TTSTT^T sel for the petitioner. •nment Advocate for the respondents/ vorking as Rural Agriculture Extension Officer in the Department of Agrfculture at Marwahi, District Bilaspur, has preferred this writ petition und^r Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. The grievance of the petitjoner is that he was imposed with a minor penalty of stoppage of one inc No.3, against which the petition^r preferred an appeal before respondent No.2 and the same is pending, ^ement in the year 1995 by respondent i.e., not being decided. Moreover, the arguments were heard on 28-2-2)005 and even after lapse of one year and 6 months, the appeal is not (fecided by respondent No.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submfts that in the circumstance, respondent No.2 be directed to decide the aripeal. The prayer made by leanjied counsel for the petitioner is just and reasonable and, therefore, resi^ondent No.2 is directed to decide the appeal of the petitioner at the ear|liest. With the directionaforesaip, the petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge p^» P.T.O.