IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45366 of 2009 Shankar Rai, S/O Late Tetar Rai, R/O Vill.- Terasia, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, Hajipur, Distt.- Vaishali. ………..Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Ramanand Rai S/O Late Tetar Rai R/O Vill.- Terasia, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, Hajipur, Distt.- Vaishali 3. Bundela Rai S/O Ramanand Rai R/O Vill.- Terasia, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, Hajipur, Distt.- Vaishali 4. Harendra Rai S/O Ramanand Rai R/O Vill.- Terasia, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, Hajipur, Distt.- Vaishali 5. Minta Devi W/O Baijnath Singh R/V- Karnpura, P.S.- Gangabridge, Hajipur, Distt.- Vaishali At Hajipur 6. Baijnath Singh @ Baidyanath Singh S/O Ram Ishwar Singh R/V- Karnpura, P.S.- Ganga bridge, Hajipur, Distt.- Vaishali At Hajipur 7. Ramikbal Singh S/O Ram Sharan Singh R/V- Karnpura, P.S.- Gangabridge, Hajipur, Distt.- Vaishali At Hajipur 8. Parmeshwar Singh S/O Ram Bad Singh R/V- Karnpura, P.S.- Ganga bridge, Hajipur, Distt.- Vaishali At Hajipur. …..Opposite Parties ---------------------------------- 3. 21.12.2011 The informant-petitioner has preferred this application under Section 439 (2) of the Cr.P.C. for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the accused opposite party nos. 2 to 8 in complaint case no.CI- 631/2009, Trial No.3394/09 for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 463, 465, 466, 467, 468, 323 and 504 of the I.P.C. vide order dated 7.11.2009 passed in A.B.P.No.1462/2009 by the learned Sessions Judge. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner 2 and the learned counsel for the State. On perusal of the impugned order, it appears to be a case of civil dispute. More than two years have passed after passing of the impugned order. I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)