IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 5522 of 2008 Decided on: 30.07.2010 Bhagirath …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner. : Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents No. to 3 : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the respondent No. 5 : None. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner fairly submits that the petition has become infructuous with the passage of time. Accordingly, the petition is dismsised as infructuous. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge July 30, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?