1 RA 180.2011 in WP 7675.2009 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 180 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7675 OF 2009 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr.K.M.Nagarkar, Advocate for the applicant Mr.A.N.Nagargoje, Advocate for the Respondent. ............................ CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 10/08/2011 PER COURT : 1. The applicant seeks review of the order dated 14/07/2011 passed by this Court, thereby setting aside the order passed by the Collector and remitting the matter back for fresh decision after giving opportunity of hearing. 2. Mr. Nagarkar, the learned counsel for the applicant contends that the original petitioner made incorrect statement that he was not given an opportunity of hearing. In fact, series of letters were exchanged and the Say of the original petitioner was also called, but this fact was suppressed by the petitioner. The learned counsel 2 RA 180.2011 in WP 7675.2009 further contends that in para no. 6 of the order, it has been observed that the High Court has set aside the order passed by the Hon’ble Minister and the same was not in a Writ Petition filed by the present respondent, but by the present review petitioner/applicant. 3. Even accepting the contention that the earlier order was passed in Writ Petition filed by the present review petitioner, still the effect would not change, the order of the Hon’ble Minister, is set aside. As regards the opportunity of hearing, the Collector had not heard the original petitioner before passing the order. In light of that the matter was remitted to the Collector. The present review petitioner can file necessary objection before the Additional Collector before whom the matter is pending if it is otherwise permissible. 4. The Review Application as such is dismissed. No costs. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ] KNP/RA 180.2011 in WP 7675.2009