1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.50 OF 2009 Mrs.Shilpa Ninad Joshi ..Appellant V/s Mr.Ninad Vasant Joshi ..Respondent ---- Mr. Harihar Bhave i/by Bhave & Co. for the appellant. Mr. S.B.Khurjekar & R.V.Govilkar for the respondent. ---- Coram : R.S.MOHITE,J Date : 20th August, 2009. PC 1 Heard Advocate for the appellant. The appellant is a wife who resides in Bombay. The respondent is her husband who has filed the petition in the Family Court at Pune being M.J.Petition No.A-140/2009 for a divorce. The contention of the applicant is that she is unable to go to Pune because she had a small child aged 1 & ½ years. The Supreme Court has held in several cases that convenience of the wife must be taken into account. Advocate for the respondent states that his instructions are to leave the matter to the Court and he is also instructed not to appear. In the circumstances, I intend to dispose off the matter finally. Hence, rule. Rule is heard forthwith. In my view, this is a fit case for transfer of the matter particularly when it will be very inconvenient for the applicant who has 1 & ½ years old child. The convenience of the wife is very relevant factor to be taken 2 into account. In the circumstances, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause-(a) and stands disposed off. (R.S.MOHITE,J)