THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY. WRIT PETITION No. 3260 of 2011. ORDER: (Per Goda Raghuram,J) This is the second instalment of the petitioner’s litigative campaign. He filed an application before the Special Court under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 for issuance of proceedings against the respondents alleging that they have grabbed his land of an extent of Ac. 28.19 gts, out of Ac. 85.21 gts in S.Nos. 279, 281 to 287 of Puppalaguda village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad. The LGC was initially filed in 2008 and was returned by the Registry of the Special Court on 1.5.2009 with an endorsement that the original title deeds are not filed and that the counsel should comply with the objections. Thereafter, on behalf of the writ petitioner/applicant, a copy of an unregistered agreement of sale dt. 14.12.1966 entered into between the petitioner and the 1st respondent herein, Ramineni Brahmaiah; Thota Panchajanyam and Smt. Susheela was filed. From the recitals of the agreement, it would appear that the executant/1st respondent was to receive of Rs. 19,350/- from the office of the Regional Settlement Commissioner, Bombay and he received an amount of Rs.9,832/- leaving a balance of Rs. 9.500/- against his compensation claim which could be utilized for the purchase of evacuee property or by way of allotment of agricultural land belonging to evacuees, from the Regional Settlement Commissioner, Bombay. The 1st respondent is claimed to have authorised the 2nd respondent herein as his representative to apply for the allotment of agricultural land from the office of the Regional Settlement Commissioner, Bombay and the 1st respondent in the agreement of sale dt. 14.12.1966 is claimed to have agreed to sell his right, title and interest in the property or properties or agricultural lands likely to be allotted to him to the petitioner and had authorised the 2nd respondent his GPA to execute any sale deed on his behalf. Later on 3.12.1976, by the orders of the Chief Settlement Officer certain lands were assigned to the 1st respondent. It is clear that as on the date of the alleged agreement of sale dt. 14.12.1966 executed by the 1st respondent in favour of the petitioner, the 1st respondent had no title to any lands as no land was assigned to him, there was no such title in favour of the 1st respondent to the lands also on the date the 1st respondent executed GPA in favour of the 2nd respondent either. The lands were assigned to the 1st respondent subsequently. The LGC is filed on the premise that since the respondents 1 and 2 failed to execute the sale deeds in favour of the petitioner consequent on the agreement of sale dt. 14.12.1966, the continuance in possession of the lands by the respondents 1 and 2 constitutes an act of land grabbing under the provisions of the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982. The learned Special Court by the order impugned herein dt. 27.10.2010 has rightly rejected the LGC as misconceived. We find no reason to review the order. The writ petitioner reiterated the self same contentions as have rightly found disfavour by the Special Court. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J ______________________________ G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY, J 14.2.2011. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY. WRIT PETITION No. 3260 of 2011. Dt. 14.2.2011.