IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SA No.22 of 2006 MOST.MUNASI KUWAR & ORS . Versus KHADERAN RAM & ORS . ----------- 11 19.5.2010 Heard counsel for the appellants and the counsel appearing for the Respondents. The present appeal has been preferred by the defendant-appellant against the judgment of affirmation passed by the First Appellate Cour,t affirming the judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court. On perusal of the judgment and decree passed by the trial court and the Appellate Court, it transpires that all the issues were decided in favour of the plaintiffs/Respondent. The question being raised before this Court is regarding non-framing of the issue by the trial Court, despite, an order passed in Misc. Appeal No. 3 of 1990, in this regard. Appellants are claiming their right with respect to land on the basis of the sale deeds executed in their favour by Muniya Devi, without seeking any permission from the Consolidation Court, since the land in question is situated in the area where consolidation proceeding was - 2 - going on. The Plaintiff/respondent has entered appearance through the counsel and submitted that in any case the sale deed on the basis of which the appellants are claiming their right, its’ transaction is void, as without obtaining permission from the Consolidation Court the sale deed was executed. Considering submissions made by the parties and findings recorded by the trial Court and Appellate Court, I do not find that any substantial question of law is there for consideration in the second appeal. This appeal is dismissed. (Mridula Mishra,J.) Akumar