IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13629 of 2009 ASHOK YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.7.2009 Heard Sri Kamal Nayan Chaubey, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. There is an error creeping in my earlier order as regards the mention of paragraphs of the case diary and I correct it by noting that in place of paragraph 12 it could be 13 which contains the statement of Sabita Devi and she supports the allegation that it was this petitioner who fired the shot at the orders of his father Nageshwar Yadav so as to killing the deceased. Other persons also support the allegations. Contention is that a few witnesses examined during the trial have not supported the allegations or the charges including the one who was examined in paragraph 15 of the case diary. Be that as it may, considering the direct nature of allegation and the support it gets from some of the witnesses, the court is not inclined to review its earlier order passed in Cr.Misc.No.28050 of 2008. Petition is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )