acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 952 OF 2010 Smt. Urmila Haridayanarayan Tiwari ....Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra ... ....Respondent. ... Mr. M.S. Karnik, for the Applicant. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, APP for the State. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATED : 9th March 2010 P.C. 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 3. The F.I.R. not only discloses offence punishable under sections­ 326, 506, 379, and 34 of the IPC, but also discloses the commission of offences punishable under sections­3(10) and 3(11) of the S.C.&.S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities Act). The averments made in the F.I.R. taken at the face value do disclose commission of an offence. By section­18 of S.C. & S.T.( Prevention of Atrocities) Act, provisions of section 438 are made inapplicable. 3. Under the circumstances, the application for pre­arrest bail is rejected. (D.G. KARNIK,J.)