THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CRP No. 653 OF 2011 ORDER: This revision is preferred by the defendants in the suit. The suit has been instituted seeking perpetual injunction against the petitioners herein. The suit is instituted in the year 2006. Just about the time when the suit itself is taken out for trial, the defendants in the suit have moved IA No. 1961 of 2010 seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for undertaking inspection of the suit schedule land and for the purposes of noting down the existing physical possession of the defendants. The learned Senior Civil Judge rightly noticed that an Advocate Commissioner should not be appointed for collection of evidence for the parties and hence dismissed the application. I do not see any improper exercise of discretion by the court while dismissing the IA for me to exercise the revisional jurisdiction. Hence, Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. --------------------------------- Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J knk 4th March 2011