Misc. App. No. 1468 of 2006 IN Criminal Misc. App. No. 618 of 2005 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard Shri Rajendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri H.C. Pathak, learned counsel for respondent No.3 and learned A.G.A. for respondents No. 1 and 2. This is application, moved on behalf of the petitioners, for deciding the case in terms of the compromise entered between the parties. Copy of compromise is annexed, as annexure-1 to the affidavit, filed in support of said application. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection if the application is allowed and the petition is disposed of in view of the compromise between the parties. On behalf of respondent No. 3, a separate affidavit has been filed today, confirming the compromise between the parties. The same be taken on record. Criminal complaint case, which is sought to be quashed, has arisen out of a matrimonial dispute. In view of the compromise between the parties, and the principle of law laid down in B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana 2003 (4) S.C.C. 675, the petition No. 618 of 2005, under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., is disposed of in view of the compromise between the parties, and the criminal proceedings of criminal complaint case No. 1015 of 2005, between the parties are quashed. Dt. 08.09.2006 (P.C. Pant, J.) S