1 Cri.Appln.No.2979/2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2979/2006 1) Pandit s/o Sukhlal Choudhari Age: 67 Yrs., occu.Contractor R/o Pakhali Kunwa,Nandurbar, Tq. And Dist. Nandurbar. 2) Rajesh s/o Namdeo Choudhari, Age: 37 Yrs., occu.Service, R/o Plot No.23, Deochand Nagar, Nandurbar, Tq. And District Nandurbar. = APPLICANTS (orig. Accused) VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra. 2) Magan s/o Sukhalal Choudhary, Age: 60 Yrs., occu.Service, R/o Plot No.84, Chaugule Plot, Sonai Niwas, Jalgaon. = RESPONDENTS Mr. NB Patil, APP for State ----- CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI,JJ. DATE : 18th October, 2011. ORAL JUDGMENT (PER :A.H.JOSHI,J.) 1) None for the applicants and Respondent No.2. 2) Heard learned APP. Perused the Criminal 2 Cri.Appln.No.2979/2006 Application. 3) It is seen from the record that FIR is dated 30.6.2006. The grievance of the complainant is that the minutes of the meeting and proceedings of the meeting held in 1997, 2002 etc are bogus and forged. 4) It is shown in the FIR that these record was subjected to scrutiny under Section 21 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act in the proceedings for decision on the change report. It is also seen that the change reports were accepted. 5) On the very face of it, the FIR is vexatious and afterthought and abuse of process of law. On this sole ground, the petition succeeds. 6) Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (B). sd/- sd/- (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (A.H.JOSHI,J.) bdv/