IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1140 of 2006 NIRANJAN KUMAR GUPTA Versus KARAM CHAND THAKUR & ORS ----------- 3 05.12.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. This Court is fully satisfied that no error much less any jurisdictional error has been committed by the Court below while passing the impugned order. This Court has also perused the certified copy of the entire order sheet and from the same it is clear that whatever delay had been caused after 26.3.1998 when the evidence of the both sides were completed, argument heard and the suit was posted for judgment was entirely the own making of the plaintiff-petitioners. . That being so, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order imposing cost for reopening of the case from the stage of evidence of plaintiff, which in effect would amount to causing un called delay of more than ten years in disposal of suit. If the petitioner in capacity of plaintiff wants to examine himself his such prayer could not have been allowed without adequately compensating the defendant-opposite parties by imposing cost on the petitioner. Accordingly, this Civil Revision application being wholly misconceived is hereby dismissed with a direction to dispose of the suit in question of the year 1990 within a period of six months. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) - 2 -