1 cra493 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.493 OF 2011 Smt.Fensidevi Champalal ...Applicant vs. Satish Devji Bhandar & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.P.N.Karlekar for the applicant Mr.Chandrakant Chavan for the respondent no.1 CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 14, 2011 P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicant. On instructions he states that the applicant is not pressing the revision application on merits. He submits that the applicant is in possession of the suit premises which is a residential premises for last several years and therefore, a longer time to vacate the suit premises be granted. The said prayer is opposed by the learned counsel for the first respondent. 2 The applicant has made a statement that revision is not being pressed on merits. Therefore, the decree for possession will become final. The applicant appears to be in possession for a very long time. The suit premises are residential premises. Considering the aforesaid aspects, time to vacate deserves to be granted till the end of November 2013 subject to applicant and all adult family members of his family filing usual 2 cra493 undertakings to vacate. 3 Hence, I pass the following order : i) Revision Application is dismissed as not pressed. ii)Notwithstanding dismissal of the revision application, decree for possession shall not be executed till 30th November 2013 subject to condition of the applicant and all adult members of his family filing usual undertakings in this Court within a period of four weeks from today. iii)If undertakings are not filed within the stipulated time, the decree for possession will become forthwith executable. JUDGE