MCC No.158 of 2010 CLMA No.1914 of 2010 In WPSB No.1386 of 2002 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Pramod Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. Anjali Bhargava, Standing Counsel (Central Govt.) for the respondents. The delay condonation application is allowed. Delay in filing restoration application is condoned. The petitioner has filed restoration application to recall the order dated 28.04.2008. The cause shown is sufficient. The restoration application is allowed. The order dated 28/04/2008 is recalled and the petition is restored to its original number. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner has questioned the legality and validity of the order of the termination dated 8th October, 1992. This Court finds that no relief can be granted. In the first instance, the order of termination was passed by the 5th Assam Rifles which is based in Shillong in the State of Meghalaya. No cause of action or part of cause of action has arisen in the State of Uttarakhand. Consequently, the writ petition is not maintainable. Even otherwise, the order of termination is of the year 1992 whereas the writ petition was filed in the year 2002. No plausible explanation has been given explaining the delay in approaching the court belated. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 29.03.2010 Shiv