IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 2ND JANUARY 2009 / 12TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 37084 of 2008(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ K.M.JOSEPH, KOLADITHARA HOUSE, KAINAKARY EXTN.P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA 2. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KUTTANAD TALUK, ALAPPUZHA. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KAINAKARY VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA 4. PUNJA SPECIAL OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA 5. THE TALUK SURVEYOR, ALAPPUZHA 6. DOMINIC JOSEPH @ JOY, PANACHIKKAL HOUSE, KAINAKARI P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 7. SRI.MUKUNDAN, MAZHUVACHORIL HOUSE, KAINAKARI P.O., ALAPPUZHA. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 37084 OF 2008 (M) ==================== Dated this the 2nd day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that respondents 6 and 7 had reclaimed a portion of the water channel passing through the eastern side of his property and thus reduced the width of the said channel. It is stated that he has filed complaints in this behalf to several authorities, but however, there was no action taken. Petitioner is referring to Ext.P4 report of the Tahsildar and contends that the report supports his case. 2. Be that as it may, now that according to the petitioner, Ext.P5 complaint made by him before the 2nd respondent remains unattended, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P5 and pass orders thereon on the light of Ext.P4. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, with notice to respondents 6 and 7 against whom allegations have been made. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp