"-^ ^ C^^}^^lGyl Before tBe Hta'ble Madbya Pradesh State Admlnlstrallve Raipur Bench&alpUE M.E.: In the matter of O. &.M". ?_ Betweens Shanker Kumai Cbowdhary. aged 42 years soa of ShrlN.K.ChowdhaEy, Asstt.Srade III .<3rouHcl water Survey Gl.tcle. "Departnaent of Water Bes°urces» Gi.vi.l tilnes, Rai.purEl.P. Versus 1. State of Madhya Pradesh, througb Secretary, Water Resouxces Deptt. Mi.nistry of watee Besou.Eces* Vallabh Bhaaan, ShcpaivM.P. 2. CW.af Engtneer Water Resources Bepartaient Mahyiadl P E oject :. M.P. . r-' •' ' ^ ' scut3.ve Englaeer, Allo-tment, ite^.ResQUtces Dlvi.sl cn KO.II O. R. PAT^A9ii%F Gh°**' y f <«or<«r«a»o<Sa|.^pu4lM. P . * ( Area- Civ»Djsn ' ) * ta'lwl^a'F''®lariaJ^>adaBiwae, aged abput 48 years ft,%\ !:,^f<T;'iMAs4$^3ra^.IIIt @r°"nd«ater'SujEvsyCj.rcle 'yy'<'"'*'Jl*ff93^^ibnenf bf ,:Water/Resouxces,. ~.'; • ^^'S'^^W^- ^tae;s, Sal-pur M.p, Bi^op' \/'' 'B.M.Wathulkar aged 50 years, Mahanadl Pxeject, Clvil t<lnes Ralpiar Ci.p. >i?LIC&'HON X}NQER SEC'IT(» l9 Off AIMXNXSTR&TIVE TBIBUNi^ ACI The petltioner most respeetfully submlts as under s 1. pac-ti.eulars of fte » Petl.tioner. /z^lTZ^" The petlttoner ts worktng as Asslstant Srade XII ln Sround Water Survey Gl.rcle Wa-ter Kesouxces DepartBBiit and 1s pres- ently pOsted at ei.vll Llnes 6fQ.ee, Ralpur. The ^pllcant had been ln<3ucte< -feo the e%>loyment Inltially as<3aity CQRtd, 2. ^-^^^^^•g^'^s] sn^sTtniR'iicn aairai^iTaitirai Tumane >d-E.q "i||A||rt<4, t»-ri1'9<l<e,Rrtltiy ^^.^,^.^''^/o<r 3TI^?T q^'5 (4c|ij6|<d) -3 s;Rii8R^rii?ian^?T SB: Hon'ble Shri Manlndra Moll 16^)2-2010 When the matter was c^ petitioner and the matter was pa^ appears forthe petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy| No.1 to3. ^k>ne for other respondent^ Taking into consideratbn petition, the same is dismissed f<ji reserved to the petitioner to rev^e survives for consideration. A cot>y forthwith. cpioln<11i *ii*io1'^f ls»cl•((ui't^K ^i srf^q sn^si an Shrivastava. J. Ited for hearing, none appeared for the sed over. Even in the second round, none Govt. Advocate for the State/responderts the nature of oontroversy involved in the ir want of proseoutton. However, liberty is the {»titton, if the cause of action still of the order be sent to the petitioner Sd/- Manindra^anSbrivastava Judge L «