BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Tuesday, the Eleventh day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.11966 of 2011 PALAMANI :PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT. CR.NO.39/2011 :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.MUTHALRAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDI, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for offences under Sections 406 and 467 read with 471 & 420 IPC, in Crime No.39 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, the petitioner has come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of prosecution, the petitioner is the former Village President of Kilikudi Village Panchayat, Pudukottai District. It is alleged that the petitioner has not accounted for the money spent by the Panchayat and thus, she has caused loss to the Panchayat. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would refute these allegations According to him, every expenditure of the Panchayat is borne out by records and all the records have been submitted to the Department. 4.Having regard to the fact that all the records are in the custody of the police and the fact that the transactions are borne out by records and the further fact that the petitioner is a woman enjoying the special status under Section 437 Cr.P.C., and all the attending circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangudi, Pudukottai District, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m., without fail for a period of four weeks for the purpose of interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 11/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Alangudi, Pudukottai District. 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pudukottai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Sub Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Pudukottai District. +1CC to M/S. NA.PALANIYANDI Advocate SR.No.35048. RP/12.10.2011/1p/6c. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11966 of 2011,Date:11/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/