IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32920 of 2010 VARUN YADAV, S/o Late Ramchandra Prasad. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.33836 of 2010 TARUN YADAV, S/o Late Ramchandra Yadav Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 05.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 307/34, 448, 341, 342, 324 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Considering that there is direct allegation against the petitioner, Varun Yadav of having fired at one injured and caused injury on the head, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, Varun Yadav. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, considering that the petitioner, Tarun Yadav is said to have fired at the injured, Sanni Kumar but simple injuries were caused on his person and he did not specify about the petitioner, his prayer for bail is rejected only for the present. He may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner Tarun Yadav’s case shall not be bifurcated for purposes of commitment or framing of charge and in case it is done his prayer for bail shall not be considered. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)