IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14358 of 2009 Date of Decision : March 11, 2010. Gurmail .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.B.S.Chahal, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is a S.S.Master in the Education Department, Government of Punjab. He was placed under suspension as there were complaints of his rude and indecent behaviour with the female employees. The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct the respondents to re-instate him in service and also to grant 75% subsistence allowance after expiry of six months of his suspension in terms of Rule 7.2 of the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume-I. Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto, the respondents have filed their reply-affidavit. Mr.B.S.Chahal, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab C.W.P.No .14358 of 2009 2 informs that the petitioner has now been re-instated in service subject to the outcome of the pending enquiry and a charge-sheet for regular departmental enquiry has also been served upon him vide memo dated 29.12.2009. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Enquiry Officer to expedite the pending proceedings. Dasti. March 11, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE