1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.116 OF 2006 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1051 OF 2006 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.116 OF 2006 Ramesh Belose. ...Petitioner. Vs. Smt.Parimala Jeevanantham & others. ...Respondents. --- Mr.Chetan Kapadia i/b. M/s.Harakchand & Co., for Petitioner. Mr.Ravi Kadam A.G. With Shailesh Shah i/b. Zohail & Co., for Respondents. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 25th April,2006 P.C.:- 1. The learned Advocate General appearing for all the respondents states that in an application filed under Section 9 of the Act which was filed by 2 the respondents before the District Judge, Coimbatore, an order by consent of the parties has been made. The statement is accepted. In view of the consent order passed by the District Judge, Coimbatore in the petition filed under Section 9 of the Act, in view of the provisions of Section 42 of the Act this Court will not have jurisdiction to entertain the petition filed under Section 9 of the Act by the petitioner. The Petition and the notice of motion are disposed of. ---