IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH JUNE 2007 / 16TH JYAISHTA 1929 WP(C).No. 30358 of 2006(L) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------- V.K. GIRIJAMMA, AGED 48 YEARS, W/O.ANANDAN, SELECTION GRADE TYPIST, DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICE, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN SRI.TOJAN J. VATHIKULAM RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF TREASURIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF TREASURIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SMT.R. RASHEEDA, L.D.TYPIST, SUB TREASURY, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA. 4. THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA. 5. THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, CHENGANNUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO. 30358/2006 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B2-108-2006 DT.8.11.06, ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE ABOVE REPRESENTATION DT.14.11.06. /TRUE COPY/ tss K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.30358 of 2005-L ------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of June, 2007. J U D G M E N T The petitioner while working as Selection Grade Typist in the District Treasury Office, Alappuzha was transferred to Chengannur, by Ext.P1 order dated 9-11-2006. This writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P1. According to the petitioner, the transfer has been effected only to accommodate the third respondent. So, she seeks to quash Ext.P1. She has filed Ext.P2 representation before the second respondent against Ext.P1. 2. The first respondent has filed a counter affidavit in which it is stated that the third respondent has been accommodated on humanitarian grounds. The petitioner has been continuously working in Alappuzha for the last 14 years. Since the petitioner was working at Alappuzha for more than 14 years, I find nothing illegal with her transfer. The Writ Petition is therefore dismissed. If Ext.P2 is received and pending, and if no orders were passed on it so far, the second respondent will pass orders on it, within one month from the date of production of a copy of this WPC No.30358 of 2006 2 judgment. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. MS