IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN MONDAY ,THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2018 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA, 1940 WP(C).No. 10613 of 2010 PETITIONER/S: EASWARA WARRIER S/O.LATE PARVATHY WARASSIAR, AGED 56 YEARS,, THAZHEKALLIYIL HOUSE, MUNDALLUR P.O., KANNUR. BY ADVS. SRI.D.SREEKUMAR SRI.TONY PETTAH RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE (DEVASWOM), DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2 THE COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT) HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE, ENDOWMENTS KOZHIKODE. 3 SREE PERALASSERI DEWASOM TRUSTEE BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, SREE PRELASSERY, TEMPLE, MUNDALLUR P.O., KANNUR DIST. 4 ROHINI VARASSIAR D/O.LATE PARVATHY VARASSIAR, AGED 59 YEARS,, THAZHEKALLIYIL HOUSE, MUNDALLUR P.O., KANNUR. 5 LAKSHMI VARASSIAR D/O.LATE PARVATHY VARASSIAR, AGED 78 YEARS,, POOMADOM HOUSE, KUTTOTH AMSOM, MEMUNDA DESOM,, VADAKARA. 6 T.K.DIVAKARA VARRIER S/O.DEVAKI VARASSIAR, AGED 62 YEARS,, PERUMANNU, KALLIAD DESOM, IRIKKOOR P.O.,, KANNUR. BY ADVS. SRI.N.MANOJ KUMAR,SC,MALABAR DEVASWOM SMT.M.SINDHU THANKAM SMT.P.G.BABITHA SMT.P.K.RADHIKA SC MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD SMT.R.RANJINI SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN SRI.K.P.SUDHEER WP(C).No. 10613 of 2010 2 SRI.K.R.SUNIL SC MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD SRI.N.MANOJ KUMARSCMALABAR DEVASWOM SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR (SR.) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17.12.2018, ALONG WITH WP(C).29239/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 10613 of 2010 3 J U D G M E N T This writ petition has been filed in the year 2010 with the following reliefs:- 1. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction or order to the third respondent to allow the petitioner to continue to work as Kazhakom in the third respondent till the petitioner also get equal opportunity with the other three namely the respondents 4, 5 and 6 in the matter of benefits granted under Exhibits P2, P3 and P4 orders. 2. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction or order to direct the third respondent to consider Exhibit P6 forthwith. 3. To pass such other relief, which are deemed, fit by this Honourable Court in the interest of justice. 4. To award the entire costs of these proceedings from the third respondent. 2. I notice that no interim orders have been issued by this Court thorough out the life of this writ petition; and I am therefore of the view that the reliefs sought for has now become stale and incapable of being granted. 3. In fact when the matter was called, there was no representation for the petitioner and I am therefore of the view that the petitioner is also not interested in prosecuting this any further. WP(C).No. 10613 of 2010 4 This writ petition is consequently closed for want of prosecution. Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, JUDGE Dxy WP(C).No. 10613 of 2010 5 APPENDIX RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 : ORDER NO.P.D 101/2002 PASSED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 : ORDER IN A.P.2/2006 PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS, KOZIKKODE. EXHIBIT P3 : ORDER IN A.P.6/2007 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 : ORDER G.O.(RT)NO. 25871/2009/RD PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5 : ORDER NO.P.D.101/2 BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P6 : REPRESENTATION BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER.