BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Sixteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15983 of 2011 DURAI @ CHINNADURAI ... PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUNELVELI BRIDGE POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI, TIRUNELVELI DT. (CR.NO.851/2011) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.THIRUVADIKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.851 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, for offence under Sections 294(b), 307, 506(ii) of I.P.C. and Section 3(1 (x) of SC/ST (Preventing of Atrocities) Act. The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 12.11.2011. He has come forward with this petition seeking bail. 2. Heard Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions likely to be imposed by this Court in the event of granting bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. However, if the petitioner is released on bail, suitable conditions may be imposed. 5. I have considered the above submissions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6. Considering the submissions made by both sides, I could see that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 12.11.2011 onwards. Considering the above said facts, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, but with stringent conditions. 7. In the result, this petition is ordered and bail is granted to the petitioner on the following conditions. i) The petitioner shall be enlarged on bail in his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Tirunelveli; and ii) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. sd/- 16/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV TIRUNELVELI 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUNELVELI BRIDGE POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI, TIRUNELVELI DT. 5 THE SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI +1. CC to M/S. A.THIRUVADIKUMAR Advocate SR.No.43967 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15983 of 2011 Date :16/12/2011 SMA/19.12.2011/7C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/