HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 7th June, 2006 Bail Application No. 456 of 2006 Order on the bail application of the accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Sompal Singh S/o Bhikari Singh R/o Village Kheri Karmu Police Station – Samli District – Muzaffarnagar (U.P.) ………. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ………. Opposite Party __________________________________________________________ In Case Crime No. 50 of 2006 U/s 409, 120-B I.P.C. Police Station – Bhagwanpur District – Haridwar _________________________________________________________ Hon'ble J. C. S. Rawat, J. Heard Sri Rajendra Singh-learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. It was contended that the report has been lodged on the basis of the audit report thereafter, according to the rule 183 of the Audit Manual, the compliance report has been submitted and it has been alleged that the entire irregularities have been rectified. It was further contended that no inquiry thereafter has been held as to whether there was any misappropriation or not. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case in totality, it is a fit case for bail at this stage. Let the accused-applicant, Sompal Singh be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of J.M. Roorkee. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 07.06.2006 Shiv