ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1795 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 1795 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 1795 OF 2007 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.11889 OF 2007 APPEAL (ST) NO.11889 OF 2007 APPEAL (ST) NO.11889 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.V.D.Raut for the Applicant. Ms.Pallavi Dabholkar i/by Mr.G.S.Godbole for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 2nd May, 2008 : 2nd May, 2008 : 2nd May, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . This is an application for bringing the legal heirs of Respondent Nos.1,2,6 and 8. 2. Considering the averments made in the Civil Application that the Appellant came to know the death of respective Respondents after receipt of bailiffs report in Civil Application No.855 of 2007. The ( 2 ) the Appellant got information about the death of the Respondents in the year 2007 and immediately thereafter, moved this Civil Application in the Second Appeal in the year 2007 itself. The respective Respondents expired after the decree passed by the Appellate Court but before pending this Second Appeal. Therefore, at the time of filing Second Appeal, the Appellant does not aware of this fact and therefore, in view of the averments made in this Civil Application, I am inclined to grant prayer clauses (a), (b), (c) and (d). The Appellants to take steps within a period of eight weeks. 3. In view of this, the Civil Application is allowed, accordingly. ( 3 ) [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]