1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.412 of 1999 (Balu Keshav Ujagar vs. The State of Maharashtra) ------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders None for the petitioner. Mr. D.R.Korde, APP for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:27/8/2009 ... P.C.: 1. The matter is repeatedly called. Counsel absent. It was even called on earlier day. To repeat the same position. 2. Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, based on the complaint filed by the Food Inspector, recorded evidence and found that the food article (milk) was adulterated and not in conformity with the standard as was required. Evidence of three witnesses was considered by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate while recording conviction by order dt. 13/9/1996. 3. Appeal came to be preferred by the present applicant 2 Balu before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani. Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, on analysis of evidence adduced before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate and legal position, did not disturb the order under challenge of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate. 4. I have gone through both the judgments. I do not find any infirmity in the order recorded by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, convicting the accused and there is no illegality or perversity in the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge requiring any interference. Criminal Revision Application dismissed. Rule discharged. The accused to surrender before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate within 30 days. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/412-99crra ...