THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1885 of 2010 Date: 29.12.2010 Between: B.R. Jithender ..... Petitioner AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Hyderabad and others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri J. Suresh Rao Counsel for Respondent No.1: Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sri P. Raghavender Reddy, standing counsel for Gram Panchayats Counsel for Respondent No.3: -- The Court made the following: ORDER: This contempt case is filed alleging wilful disobedience on the part of the respondents of the order dated 29.11.2010 passed by this Court in W.P.No.29640 of 2010. I have heard Sri P. Venugopal, learned counsel representing Sri J. Suresh Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P. Raghavender Reddy, the learned standing counsel for Gram Panchayats appearing for respondent No.2. This Court, by order dated 29.11.2010 in W.P.No.29640 of 2010, directed respondent No.2 to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 09.11.2010 expeditiously within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of that order. At the hearing, the learned standing counsel representing respondent No.2 submitted and placed before this Court a copy of the letter dated 15.12.2010 addressed by respondent No.2 to the petitioner, whereby the latter’s representation has been disposed of. The learned counsel for the petitioner has admitted that the said letter was received by his client on 24.12.2010. He has, however, sought to point out that the manner of disposal of the petitioner’s representation leaves a lot to be desired. In my opinion, with the disposal of the representation of the petitioner, the order of this Court dated 29.11.2010 in W.P.No.29640 of 2010 stands complied with. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision taken by respondent No.2 on his representation, that gives rise to a fresh cause of action to him to question the said communication. Subject to the above observations, the Contempt Case is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the Contempt Case, C.A.No.1264 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 29th December, 2010 GHN