IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1078 of 2011 Jagarnath Prasad Gupta Late Keshwar Sao Vill.-Mela Ajania,P.S. Mali,Dist.-Aurangabad. ……….Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Veena Devi W/O,Jagarnath Prasad Gupta Vill.-Khiryawan,P.S.- Madanpur,Dist.-Aurangabad, Bihar. …….Opposite Parties ----------- 2. 08.11.2011 The husband-petitioner has preferred this revision application against the order dated 27.07.2011 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Aurangabad in Maintenance Case No.105/2010 by which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.1500/- per month as interim maintenance to his wife opposite party no.2. The main grievance of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is not able to pay a sum of Rs.1500/-per month as interim maintenance to his wife. He also submits that he is ready to get the maintenance case expedited. It appears that the learned Principal Judge has considered the case of both the parties and thereafter passed the orders of interim maintenance. The petitioner is still at liberty to give evidence before the learned 2 Principal Judge as the main case is still pending. I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. Let the maintenance case be expedited within four months. In the result, this revision application stands disposed of. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)