FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.5377 OF 2007 -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Mr.K.K.Pandey for the petitioner. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 17TH MARCH, 2008 DATED: 17TH MARCH, 2008 DATED: 17TH MARCH, 2008 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This petition is directed against an order dated 20.3.2007 by which Interim notice No.1460 of 2004 taken out by the petitioner seeking condonation of delay of about three years in filing an appeal against a decree of possession dated 18.8.2001 came to be dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had no knowledge of the judgment and decree. From perusal of the impugned order and more particularly paragraph 7 thereof it is clear that the petitioner has made contradictory statements on affidavits. At one stage he has stated that he got knowledge of the decree in November, 2003 and then in rejoinder he admits that he was present at the time of pronouncement of the judgment and decree with his advocate in the court, which falsify his claim regarding the knowledge of decree. Moreover, it is not disputed that the decree has already been executed. In the circumstances, for the reasons stated in the impugned order no interference by this court in the writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is called for. Hence the writ petition is dismissed. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)