IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 12TH OCTOBER 2009 / 20TH ASWINA 1931 WA.No. 2138 of 2009() ---------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.3244/2009 .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENTS IN WP ----------------------------------------------------- 1. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE DISTRICT OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION DISTRICT OFFICE, IDUKKI. BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS,SC,KPSC RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER IN WP --------------------------------------------------- 1. SMITHA C.R.,IRAMATHARA HOUSE, KOLAPRA.KUDAYATHOOR P.O., IDUKKI. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ALAKKODE THODUPUZHA,IDUKKI GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENNY GERVASIS THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH & C..T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ ----------------------------------------------------------------- W.A.NO.2138 OF 2009 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of October, 2009. J U D G M E N T Kurian Joseph,J Respondents in the writ petition are the appellants. The writ petitioner approached this court with the prayers to “ issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to accept the Nativity/Residence certificate submitted by the petitioner and award 5 marks as weightage in accordance with Rule 5A of the General Rules and also Ext.P1 notification issued by the PSC for selection and grant proper placing in the ranked list of Last Grade Servants in Idukki district .” It is seen from Annexure A and Annexure A1 that the petitioner is not entitled to get the weightage since she has claimed Ernakulam as her native district in the application. We find that these documents were not made available for perusal by the learned single judge. In W.A.NO.2138 OF 2009 2 view of the documents referred to above the writ petition cannot be allowed. Therefore, we set aside the judgment of the learned single judge, allow the appeal and dismiss the writ petition. KURIAN JOSEPH,JUDGE. C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE. pm W.A.NO.2138 OF 2009 3 W.A.NO.2138 OF 2009 4