iw‘A/ ‘13 @9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHAT’HSGARH AT BILASPUR WP. gS) N0. i 0 §O [ 2007 Smt. Anita Bek, W/o Bimal Sai, Aged about 21 years, R/o Vi11age Gopalpur, Block 85 Tehsil ~ Rajpur, Dist : Sarguja—(C.G.) Versus / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department of Women and Child Development, a D.K.s. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Resgondents Q)? \9\\ Nc§§$ /2. The Development), Collector (Women Sarguja—(C.G.) and Child 3 The Project Officer, Women and Child Development, Rajpur, Dist} Sarguja (ce) 4. Kathrina Lakra W/o Shyamnath, Aged about 28 years, R/o Village- Gopalpur, Block 8G Tehsil — Rajpur, Dist : Sarguja—(C.G.) WRIT PETITION U[A 226 OF THE CONSTlTUTlON OF AMUS INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT 1N THE NATURE or MAND , CERTIORARI, momemoN ETC. , ticulars of the Petitioner. 1. Par As per cause title. g 2&3 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI5§ARH AT BILASPUR Wri? Pe'rifion (5) No. 1050 of 2007 Pefifioner- Smf. AnH-a Bek Versus Respondenfs Sfa‘re of Chhattisgarh & ofhers Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice safish K. Agnihofri. Presenf: Mr. AN. Panda; Advocafe for fhe petifioner. Ms: Deepali Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the Stafe/respondenfs, ORDER (Passed on 23"“ Day of February, 2007) The fonowing order of 1he Cour? was passed by 5afish K. Agnihafri, J. Learned ccunsel appearing for fhe pefifioner submi‘ts The? fhe appoinfment cf respondenf No. 4 is confmry fo Anganbadi Scheme, as respondent No. 4 is nof living below fhe poverty line and her fafher in law is a Surpanch' of said village. Learned counsel appewing for 1'he peli‘l‘ioner' furfher submifs lhai' fhe pefifionen is living below fhe poverty line (BPL), as such lhe pefi‘l‘ioner has preferenlial claim over respondenf Na. 4 for appoinfmenf as Anganbodi Worker. Be fha‘r as if may, withouf expressing any opinion ‘ihe respondem‘ No. 2 is direcfed lo look info all ‘l'he allegations made by the petil'ioner' and pass approprial‘e order in accordance wilh Aanganbadi Scheme and law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3ubhash The writ petition is accordingly dispesed of. No order as to costsw. r ~ ; i Sd/_ Judge Satish K. Agnihotn o ;