IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22107 of 2009 RAJMANI KUMARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 09.09.2009 Heard both sides. The petitioner has approached this court seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that she along with others procured appointment as Anganwari Sewika. Anganwari Sewika is a post which carries honorarium. It appears that on certain objections raised, the matter was scrutinized. The certificates furnished by the appointees including the petitioner were forwarded to the Sanskrit Shiksha Board for verification whereafter it was found that the educational certificates furnished by the petitioner was/were forged, resultantly, the petitioner and all other appointees were removed from their respective positions. Under the orders of the authority, an F.I.R. was also lodged. It is contended that the petitioner did not draw any honorarium for the period she worked. It is next contended that she, on her own, has resigned. Be that as it may, having regard to the facts appearing from the record, this court is persuaded to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail. In the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, let petitioner above named be 2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Sarsi P.S. case no. 46 of 2008 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure. No sooner the charges are framed in the case, the petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed in the Court below. In case of default on two consecutive occasions without any cogent/satisfactory reason, the bail bond of the petitioner shall be cancelled and thereafter the Trial Court will be at liberty to secure his arrest in accordance with law. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )