1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1635 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 647 OF 2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1266 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 647 OF 2004 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr.S.S.Shah, for the applicant in CA No.1635/10. Mr. T.D.Deshmukh, for the respondent in CA No.1635/10. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 19/11/2010. PC: Heard learned counsel for the parties. The order dated 26.10.10 was, in fact, passed in Civil Application No.1635 of 2010. However, in the order the Civil Application number is wrongly mentioned as Civil Application No.1266 of 2010. Similarly, Civil Application no.1635 of 2010 was made absolute in terms of prayers clause (a), (b) and (c). T 2 However,, prayer clause ( c ) remained to be mentioned in the order. Office is accordingly directed to correct the number of Civil Application in the order dated 26.10.2010 and also mention prayer clause ( c) in the said order. Time to carry out amendment is extended by one week from today. Civil Application No.1635 of 2010 is disposed of, and Civil Application No.1266 of 2010 to come up for hearing after four weeks. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)