Chandka 1 wp-4343-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4343 OF 2010 Kamlesh Gandhi ..Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Saket More i/b. Vidhii Partners for Petitioner. Mr. Nainesh N. Amin for Respondent No. 3. CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. 24 February 2011. P.C. : The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner states that the issue which is sought to be raised in these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution has been raised before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. The Court has been informed that the Review Petition before the Debt Recovery Tribunal has been listed for final hearing on 31 March 2011. In that view of the matter, since the Petitioner has already taken recourse to the available remedy in law, we do not consider it appropriate to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226. We however clarify that we have not expressed any Chandka 2 wp-4343-10 opinion on the merits of the rival contentions which it would be open to the Tribunal to determine. All questions including of maintainability are kept open to be decided by the Tribunal. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. (Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud, J.) (Anoop V. Mohta, J.)