Gowri HIGH COU8T OR CHHAmSGftRH AT B1LASPUR WRIT'fETITION (G) No. 7708 of 2007 PETITjGNERS : ',, l^hesft Hjraou, aged 46 years son of Late Shri T.RHiraou.^resident of MIG 2 No. 4%, Hudco, Bhilai, Djstt. Durg.Chhattisgarh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS ;, 1, State of ChhattBgarh .Through. the Secretafy, Genera! Adfflinisfration Department, D.K.S. Bha»an,Raipur(C.G,j 2. The JointColiectoE, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 3. The Admmistcative Officer <Eng.) Cftief Executive Engineer, Mahanadi Godawari Kachar, Raipur ..,.(^,,.<:,^;1,:,K - • WRIT PETFriONUNDERARTlGLES 2% OF TI-IECWSTITUTfONOFINDlA SlnuleBencti: Hon'ble ShriSatish K. Acmihotri, J. Present: ShriT.K.Tiwari.cQurBelforthepetitioner. Shri Atok Bakshi, Oo'A. Advocate for the State. (Passed on %n day of July, 2009) 1. ^, ^Meard learnedcounsel forthe parties. 2, The petitioner has filed this petition impugriing the oreter (teted 28-11^CB7 j (Annexufe- R®)tolhe ©dentftathereare certain obseivatjons, which may prejudfce hjs case before.ttie Cagte Scrutihy Committee, though tha matter hasbeenreferred'totheGasteScrutinyCommJttee. 3,' Shri BN<shi, leaFned^ovt. Ackrocate appearing for the State, submitsfhat Ihe obseivatjonsmademthe'communjeationcisted 26-11-2007'm^beGlarified' .thatjfthere are any observations that mey not be taken jnto consideration while considering the case of the petitioner by the Caste Scrutiny Committee. , 4. In w&w of fgr^oing, it is obsen/ed ftiat t.he G®teScrutiny GommJttse while considering thecaseof the petitioner shaitconsider the case ofthe petitioner ' independently on ihe basis of documents and matenals produceel by the petitioner, inacGordance with law and on its cwn merits, without being . influencedbytheobsefvationsmadeinthereport, ifany. j < !iy, mnis Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge 'K ^ 'Es:"