IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.14232 OF 2011 MANOHAR MUSAHAR, SON OF BADRI MUSAHAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHUAN, POLICE STATION AGRER, DISTRICT ROHTAS AT SASARAM VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ******* 2 01/06/2011 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 395 & 397 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the First Information Report. Raja Ram Musahar was caught on the spot and he disclosed the name of this petitioner. On the basis of the aforesaid disclosure, the petitioner is in custody since 05.03.2010. It appears that the petitioner is also an accused in another case instituted under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. In the present case, there is no material except the confessional statement of the co-accused. In the circumstances aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in Bhabhua Police Station Case No. 222 of 2002 (Sessions Trial No. 208 of 2010/13 of 2010) on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Bhabhua subject to the 2 following conditions. (a) One of the bailors should be closely related to the petitioner; (b) The attested copies of the photographs of the bailors must be affixed on the bail bonds; (c) the petitioner will not leave the district without the prior permission of the Court below; (d) The bailors will give an undertaking in writing that they will be responsible for producing the petitioner before the Court below during the proceedings of the case; & (e) The petitioner shall remain physically present before the Court below on each and every date fixed in the case and on his absence even for a single date without any explanation to the satisfaction of the Court below, the Court below will be at liberty to take action not only against the petitioner but also against the bailors. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )