$-29 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 467/2009 & Crl.M.As. 6124/2010, 6125/2010, 7887/2010, 3905/2009, 6124/2010 % CITIZENS FOR THE WELFARE 8c PROTECTION OF ANIMALS & ANR. Petitioner Mr.Aditya Shamlal, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR. Respondent Through: Ms.Urvi Kuthiala, Advocate for Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State. Ms.Anjali Sharma, Advocate for R4/Animal Welfare Board of India. Mr. Ajay Arora, Standing Counsel for MCD. GP. Capt. Karan Singh Bhati, Advocate with Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Advocate for the applicant in Crl.M.A. 6124/2010. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA ORDER 12.12.2011 As regards the orders which have been passed by this court on 18.12.2009 and 04.02.2010, they are in the process of implementation as stated by the counsel appearing for the Animal Welfare Board of India. With regard to the grievance of the petitioner Sonya Ghosh as against the order of Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified - rr SpecialExecutiveMagistrate(SEM) dated 28"^ March, 2009, du-ectingher to execute personal bond under Section 107/111 CrPC, it has become infructuous in view of the fact that period of bond ordered by SEM having already expired and the substantial directions passed by this court on 18.12.2009 & 04.02.2010. Learned counsel appearing for the Resident Welfare Association, Kasturba Gandhi Marg states that RWA has no objection with regard to the feeding site which has been identified in the by-lane, but however, dogs may ^ not be permitted within the campus inhabited by the officers and their employees. This small issue can be sorted out by the Resident Welfare Association's representatives and the Animal Welfare Board of India. RWA representatives and the Animal Welfare Board of India will sort out this issue in the presence of their respective counsels. It is hoped that the Animal Welfare Board of India will take care of the grievance of the RWA and RWA will also reciprocately appreciate the need for identification of the sites so that the orders of this court are implemented. Petition and the miscellaneous applications stand disposed of with the above direction. Order dasti. M.L. MEHTA,J DECEMBER 12, 2011/akb