E £E§€$§§ f: @ (D CplaaL IN THE HIGH COURT or JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILAsPUR W.P. No. Mi? /2006 (8.13.) 'M.L. Patgl S/o Shri RR. Patel Agede about 41 years, R/o Padawpara, Kota, Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS xi. State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretary , Education Department , D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) QM , O?1 i w k. G. myAswn/ 2. Director of ScHool Education to 65““ D.K.S. Bhawan , Raipur (C.G.) District Education ofiicer Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) ) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE ZZGOF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA Ii ]i it PETITIONER @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (5) No. 1079 of 2007 Pe'i'i‘fioner : ML. Pa'i’el Versus Resporidenfs Sw‘i’e of Chhai’i'isgarh & ofhers /7/ SingIEvEench: Hon’ble Mr. Jusfice Safish K. Agnihoff'i. Mr. Kumaresh Tiwari, Advocate for The pe‘ri‘rioner. 5min Anju Ahuja, Depufy Governmen'r Advocn‘l‘e for fhe Sfa‘re/respondenfs, O R D E R (Passed on +his 26% Day of Fabruary, 2007) Learriad counsei appearing for The pe‘i’i‘i’ioner submi‘i’s Thai” 'i'he pE‘ti'l'ioner is working as Assisfan‘i' Teacher/LecTure'r‘. The pe'fi?ioner ob‘tained B. Ed. Examincrl'ion czr‘i’ificaw on 22-7-2005, on his owri expenses. Learned counsei appearing.for 1‘ne ‘pe‘fiiioner submits Thai The quesfion invoived, herein aS'i'o whe‘iher The feucher, who ob‘i’ained B. Ed. Examinafian Cer'fificufe on his own expenses is en'ii'iled 1’0 fwo advance incremen‘i‘s. According 'io learned coussei far fne pe‘i’i‘i’ianei‘, The pe‘fii’ioriei‘ is en'i’i'l'ied ’i'o 'i’wo aévance iricremen'fs in View of The decision of This CourT in The case of Vashwam' Kumar' Bhamdwa‘i Vs. Municipal CorpomTion, Burg and anoTher {2006 (H) MPJR-CG 96}. This CourT in The case of VashwanT Kumar Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipd Corpem‘fion, Burg and anoTher (Supra), came TD The conciusian ThaT The Teachers, who had obTained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examine-Tim CerTificaTe on Their own E3 i @ expenses, are covered by The circular da‘l’ed 24.12.98 issued by m e Sfai‘e Gavernmen‘r of Madhya Pradesh. Learned counsel for fhe pem’ionar further submi‘i's fha‘r 'rhe fads and quesfion 0f kw invoived in 1'he presen'r case are squarely covered by decision of This Court in fhe case of Vashwanf Kumar Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipa! Corpom‘tion, Burg and moi-her (Supra), 1o which ieamed counsel appearing for fne responden'i's fairiy concedes and agrees wifh The avermem made by learned counsel appearing for The peTiTioner. Accordingly, The wrif pe'ii'l'ion is allowed in Terms of The order passed in The case of Vashwanf Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal CorporaTion, Dung and another (5upra), subjecT To verificaTion of The facT as To wheTher The peTiTioner has acquired B. Ed. ExaminaTion CerTificaTe on his own expenses as per The circulars daTed 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 and furTher whe‘l'her he has been paid Two advance incremenTs or noT. No order as To cosTs. 3 Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sd/- 5ubhosh i l