IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2479 of 2009 PROSANTA KUMAR SEN & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 24.2.2009 Surendra/ Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Smt. Amrita, learned Standing Counsel No.I (Ceiling). In the opinion of this Court a proceeding under the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961 in which a notice under section 9 was issued on 22.9.1991 inviting objection under section 10 and was followed by a notification under section 11 on 15.3.1996 and was ultimately concluded by a final publication under section 15 on 27.9.1996 cannot be reopened at least by this Court on a mere insistence of the petitioners that they were not heard. The remedy for the petitioners, if any, would be to approach the appropriate authority under section 45B of the said Act. With the aforementioned observation, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)