1 1. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETIION NO.4540/2009 Om Prakash Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETIION NO.7050/2009 Gulab Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 3. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETIION NO.7031/2009 Jaswant Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 4. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETIION NO.7056/2009 Kailash Meena & Ors. Vs. tate of Rajasthan & Ors. 5. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETIION NO.4156/2009 Shanti Lal Kumhar & Ors . Vs. State & Ors. 6. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETIION NO.7073/2009 Pooja Vaishnav & Ors Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 7. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETIION NO.7068/2009 Gumana Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 8. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETIION NO.7065/2009 Bajranlal Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 9. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETIION NO.7027/2009 Madan Lal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 10. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETIION NO.7026/2009 Sohan Ram & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 11. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETIION NO.7110/2009 Bheru Lal & Ors.Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 12. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETIION NO.6830/2009 Usha Rani Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 20.7.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA. S/Sh. Kailash Khatri, Laxmi Narayan Mathur, Ajay Vyas, Sandeep Saruparia, Sudhir Saruparia, Usman Gani, Anurag Shukla, Manish Dadhich, Ranjana Sharma, Suman Sandar, AD Charan, KC Choudhary, MR Choudhary, PS Chundawat and JP Bhardawat, for the petitioners. 2 Mr. RL Jangid, Addl. Advocate General. <><><> Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submitted that they have supplied copy of the memo of writ petition to learned Addl. Advocate General Sh. RL Jangid, who is appearing in all the connected matters. The writ petitions have been heard and decided today itself because of the reason that several similar writ petitions have already been disposed of and one of which is SBCWP No.3835/2009 – Kanwar Lal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., decided on 19th May, 2009. Accordingly, these writ petitions are also disposed of in terms of the judgment referred above with following order:- (1)The automatic termination orders of the petitioner/s are set aside. The respondents are directed to continue the petitioner/s in service till regularly selected candidates by regular mode of recruitment are made available. (2)The petitioner/s shall not be entitled for wages relating to the period of vacations; and (3)On availability of the selected candidates by regular mode of recruitment, may that be by direct recruitment or by way of promotion, it shall be open 3 for the respondents to terminate the Vidhyarthi Mitras by adhering the principles of “last come first go”, by determining their seniority at State level. (PRAKASH TATIA),J. cpgoyal/- 4 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETIION NO._______/2009 DATE OF ORDER : 20.7.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA. S/Sh. Kailash Khatri, Laxmi Narayan Mathur, Ajay Vyas, Sandeep Saruparia, Sudhir Saruparia, Usman Gani, Anurag Shukla, Manish Dadhich, Ranjana Sharma, Suman Sandar, AD Charan, KC Choudhary, MR Choudhary, PS Chundawat and JP Bhardawat, for the petitioners. Mr. RL Jangid, Addl. Advocate General. <><><> This writ petition is disposed of (see separate order in S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETIION NO.4540/2009- Om Prakash Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) decided today itself i.e., 20.7.2009. By order Court Master Court no.5.