IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.37196-M of 2010 Date of Decision:16.3.2011 Sarabjit Kaur .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sidharth Sarup, D.A.G. Haryana. Mr. Ranjit Singh, Advocate-respondent No.3 also for respondents No.4 and 5. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Respondent No.3-Mr. Ranjit Singh, Advocate also on behalf of respondents No.4 and 5 has placed on record the judgment rendered by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Karnal, vide which the petitioner has been acquitted of the charges framed against her. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 16.3.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE