IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.7752 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.12.2011 Satish Kumar -----Petitioner Vs. Gurcharan Singh -----Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present:- Mr. S.K.Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. --- RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J. This is tenant’s revision petition challenging the impugned order dated 25.11.2011 of the Rent Controller, Patiala assessing provisional rent. The aforesaid order is appealable in view of judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Harjit Singh Uppal v. Anup Bansal, JT 2011(6) SC 236. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the instant revision petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy before the Appellate Authority, in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. December 15, 2011 ( RAKESH KUMAR GARG ) ak JUDGE