... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5622 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.28278 OF 2005 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Ms Asha i/by Mr A.M. Saroagi for the Applicants. Mr Anant Iyenger for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : APRIL 18, 2006. : APRIL 18, 2006. : APRIL 18, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocates appearing for the parties. Application is strongly opposed by the learned Advocate appearing for the Respondents. 2. Sufficient cause is made out. However, considering the averments made in the affidavit-in-reply, the Respondents will have to be compensated by ordering payment of costs. Hence, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to condition of the Appellants paying sum of Rs.7,500/- by way of costs to the Respondents within period of three weeks from today. Payment of costs will be condition precedent. If compliance is not made, the Application will stand rejected.