1 S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.9784/2009 Dayal Vs. State Date of Order :::: 08/12/2009 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr. Ashok Verma, Counsel for the Petitioner Mr. G.S. Fauzdar, Public Prosecutor for State *** Heard learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as the learned Pubic Prosecutor for the State and perused the case-diary as well as the order passed by the learned Court below. This is bail application under Section 439, Cr.P.C. It is contended by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner that the case of the petitioner – Dayal son of Shri Languriya is not distinguishable from that of other accused – Amrit Singh, Roopey and Languriya, who have been granted bail by this Court under Section 439, Cr.P.C. in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.9607 of 2007 vide order dated 30.11.2009. This fact is not in dispute. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner – Dayal son of Shri Languriya on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. during the pendency of the trial on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) and two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the 2 satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the trial Court as and when called upon to do so. The bail application is accordingly disposed of. (Dalip Singh), J. ashok/