IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA ---------- Letters Patent Appeal No.887 of 2011 -------- Appeal against part of order dated 26-11-2010 passed in Test Suit No. 03/2009 by a Bench of this Court in I.A. No. 5335 of 2009 ---------- Madan Mohan Sharan, Son of late Sitabar Sharan, R/o Sheikhpura, P.S. Hawai Adda, Dist-Patna... Appellant Versus 1. Ashok Bihari Sharan , S/o late Sitabar Sharan, R/O 204, Bailey Kunj Apartment, At- Sheikhpura, P.S. Shastri Nagar, District- Patna. 2. Dinesh Bihari Sharan, S/O late Sitabar Sharan,302 Ambajee Apartment, Sheikhpura, P.S.Shashtri Nagar, Patna-14. 3. Alka Sharan, D/O late Sitabar Sharan, W/O Ashok Kumar Sinha, 102, Maa Vindyavasini Complex, Sheikhpura More, P.S. Shashtrinagar,Patna.. Respts. ------------ 4 29-8-2011 Heard the parties. We are satisfied that by virtue of Section 300 of the Indian Succession Act the High Court has concurrent jurisdiction as available to the District Judge under section 192 of that Act. It further appears that by the order under appeal the learned single Judge has simply issued notice upon another person who is said to be in possession of the property of the deceased so that the property may not be damaged, alienated or destroyed. We are not persuaded to 2 enter into the merits of the dispute between the parties but we find that by the impugned order the learned single Judge has not decided any rights or important issue which may be treated as a judgment amenable under clause (10 ) of the Letters Patent Appeal of this Court. In that view of the matter, this appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. The points available to the parties may be agitated before the learned single Judge at appropriate stage. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) ( Shivaji Pandey,J)