Criminal Misc. No.M-9259 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-9259 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.03.2011 Ravi Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & Others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present: Mr.Mansur Ali Advocate for the petitioner. * * * Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C for modification in the impugned order dated 25.10.2010 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala in cross-version dated 10.05.2010 arising out of FIR No.259 dated 10.06.2009 registered under Sections 307, 323, 148, 149 IPC at Police Station Sadar, Patiala. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that accused persons had given injuries to the petitioner on the head and vital parts of the body. He further submits that injury No.1 was on the right side of the occipital region and injury No.2 was also on occipito-furital bone region and CT scan was advised. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner remained in hospital for four days and the charge should have been framed under Section 307 IPC but the same has not been framed only on the ground that opinion of the doctor was not there and intention to cause grievous injury was also there. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the petitioner. Only by stating that the intention of the accused persons was to cause death or such injury, the charge should have been framed under Section 307 IPC instead of 324 IPC is not sufficient at this stage. The Criminal Misc. No.M-9259 of 2011 (O&M) 2 intention of the accused cannot be seen at this stage as the evidence has not come so far and it is for the trial court to see on the basis of evidence available during the period of trial whether the intention of the accused was there to cause grievous injuries or not. No ground is made out to interfere. Dismissed. (DAYA CHAUDHARY) March 28, 2011. JUDGE Seema-II