G i,^ (-^^ Petitloner €f'^11' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR / 2007 .p. .••"»<'' -/^, .^i€-/ ^<^y ^••ffy 12) Versus Respondents : i) ...-.-^^\^ ^^s ,^^ o e^' ^ ii) iii) Beerendra Kuniar Sahu, S/o Shri Bahel Singh Sahu, Aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primaiy School, Nevai, Bhilai Nagar, Durg, Dist : Durg-(C.G.) State of ChhattisgarH Through-The Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur-(C.G.) Directorate of Public Instruction, Raipur-(C.G.) Distriet Education Officer, Durg-(C.G-) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HSGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH AT BSLASPUR ^- 2. W.P.('S)No. 1284 of 2007 Petitfoner O^iSr^y^?"^ l^(i?*i'sr CsHi* £%;Sj^l lult o rxyilifii wciiii Vereus State ofChhattssgarh & others SB: Hon'bie Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotrj, J Shri S. K. Thomas, Advocats rorfhe petitioner. Shri Safeh Gupte, Deputy Govt. Adv'ocate for the respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 2nd day of March, 2007) The foSiowJng order ofthe Court Is passed by Satteh K. Agnihofri, J. 1. Learnsd counsel appearing for the petitioner submits Shat the question of lav/ involved in this peti'Sicfl is govemed by the cireular dated 20.1.1987. The High Courtof Madhya Pradesh, Indore Bench, in fts case of Sndraveer Singh Tomar Vs. State of M.P. and others { 2004 (2) M.P.H.T. 3 ^OC)}, has considered the issue and disposed of She said matter in the fQ!!owing terms:- "2..........!n viev/ of this submisston advanced by Counse! for parties, this petition js disposed of by gwmg fotlowins directions. Ths respondent No.1 sha!! consider petifioner's representaSions referred to above and dispose of She same at an eariy dste, preferabiy wittiin s period of 3 months from the il'd ^if /k/Mfy!t*w**i>^i<i»34'i/a»^ /s? <4^?<* ^v^Ar ?n '!^^.*.n»v4-'^f*^»^^ *flwf^1i I'^ie? ItSS Vi fcrVtlitijyifi^eauVii iw?l liiiS ViU^i iii ct^^rvi ual i^i>? WiUj isiW, keeping in mind ttse circutars issu'ed by Stete Govt. ss also the direcBons given bythe Tribunal 'in sjmiiar matters." Learned counsei appearing for the parties would ]oint!y submit and admit Shat this case, being similar sn nature, is squareiy coversd by the decisfon in the case of Sndraveer Singh Tomar (supra). !n vlew of the aforestated reasons, this petition is dfeposed of wlth Slberty to the petstioner to make a representation aiong with a copy of tt^e order passed tn the case cf Indraveer Singh Tomar (supra), v/hich may be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representatton. No order as to costs. Thakur Sd/- SaUsbK-Agnihom Jud&e