IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC(T) No. 240 of 2008 Decided on: 6.12.2010 Prem Singh and others …Petitioners Versus Sh. Shyam Singh Dogra and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioners : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr.R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : In sequel to order dated 22.11.2010, respondents Mr. Shyam Singh Dogra, Mr. Vijay Singh Rana and Mr. Deepak Verma are present in the Court. It is jointly represented by the parties that petitioner No. 1 Prem Singh has resumed his duties. However, as far as petitioner No. 3 Chaman Singh is concerned, Mr. Deepak Verma, Deputy Director, Horticulture, Chamba undertakes that if he approaches him within a period of one week, he shall also be given suitable employment at Nehla. Consequently, petitioner No. 3 Chaman Singh is directed to approach the Deputy Director Mr. Deepak Verma, within a week along with the certified copy of this judgment. It is further directed that if the work is not available, the services of petitioner No. 1, Prem Singh and petitioner No. 3, Chaman Singh shall not be terminated and they will be adjusted either at Nehla 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- or nearby Projeny-cum-Demonstration Orchard. In view of the fair stand adopted by Mr. Deepak Verma, Deputy Director, the notices are discharged. 2. With these observations and directions made hereinabove, the present petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 6, 2010 (K. Attri)