IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH JANUARY 2009 / 8TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 369 of 2009(R) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ M.S.CHANDRAVALLY, AGED 54 YEARS, W/O.HARIHARAN, THIRUVONAM, THATHAMPALLY P.O., ALAPPUZHA, SECRETARY, PUNNAPRA NORTH GRAMA PANCHAYATH. BY ADV. MR.MATHEW JAMES RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. DEPUTY SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF PANCHAYAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR PANCHAYAT, ALAPPUZHA. 4. SECRETARY, PULINKUNNU GRAMA PANCHAYATH,ALAPPUZHA. *ADDL.R5 IS IMPLEADED: R5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. (*ADDL.R5 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DTD. 28/01/2009 IN I.A.NO.1144/09) BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO: 369 of 2009 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of suspension Ext.P1 dated 5.12.2008, while she was working as the Secretary of Pulinkunnu Grama Panchayat during the period 9.10.2006 to 21.5.2007. She has been suspended alleging irregularities in disbursement of pension. 2. According to the petitioner, the allegations are not correct and the real facts have not been considered by the authority. Ext.P2 is the memo of charges to which the petitioner has submitted Ext.P5 explanation. Meanwhile, he has filed Ext.P6 representation before the first respondent seeking revocation of suspension order. The same has been filed by invoking the relevant rules under the Kerala Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1960. 3. When the matter came up for admission on 5.1.2009, the learned Government Pleader was directed to get instructions whether Ext.P5 has been received by the Government. It is reported today, at the time of further hearing that the same has been received and no final orders are passed in the matter. wpc:369 of 2009 2 Therefore, there will be a direction to the Secretary to Government, Local Self Government Department, Thiruvananthapuram to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE bps