1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION (LODG.) NO.55 OF 2009 Bindu G. Rohira ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents. .... Mr. A. Rane for the Petitioner. Mr. Mandar Goswami for Respondent No.1. Ms. A.R. Joshi for the BMC. .... CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 4th March, 2009. P.C. : The contention raised is that vide Exhibit H complaint is made by the Petitioner, but no effective steps have been taken. Thus, the Petitioner was compelled to file the present writ petition. Counsel appearing for the Corporation states that they will look into the grievance made by the Petitioner in the present writ petition and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law after hearing the concerned parties expeditiously. The Respondents will abide by the statement. In view of the statement made, nothing survives in the Petition. The 2 same is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.