:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO 1668 OF 2006 Sopan Bhausaheb Gunjal and Anr ....Applicants. V/s The State of Maharashtra ....Respondents. ----- Mr. B.P. Abhale for the applicants. Ms. S.D. Shinde, APP for the State. ---- CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J. DATE: DATE: DATE: 23rd June, 2006 23rd June, 2006 23rd June, 2006 P.C. 1. This is a second application for bail which is filed by the applicants. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the applicants that from the statements of the witnesses which are recorded, it can be seen that no case is made out against the present applicants. It is further submitted that Kalpana, daughter of the complainant, accidently fell into the well. It is further submitted that there was no occasion for the applicants to demand dowry as they were financially well off and, therefore, the statements of witnesses cannot be relied upon. :2: 3. The learned APP appearing on behalf of the State has submitted that there is no change in the circumstances. The first application is rejected on merits. 4. In my view, no case is made out for grant of bail at this stage. The earlier application was rejected in March, 2006. There is no change in the circumstances. However, considering the fact that the applicants are in jail since last 11 months, liberty is granted to the applicants to apply for bail in Sessions Court in October, 2006. 5. Application is accordingly disposed of. V.M. V.M. V.M. KANADE, J. KANADE, J. KANADE, J.