IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2847 of 2010 KRISHNA KANT MISHRA S/O LATE RADHA RAMAN MISHRA R/O GAYATRI APARTMENT, FLAT NO. 401, NEAR D.I.G.'S RESIDENCE BADI KHANJARPUR, P.S.- BARARI, TOWN & DISTT.- BHAGALPUR Versus 1. THE T.M.BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY BHAGALPUR, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR T.M. BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR 3. THE REGISTRAR T.M. BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR 4. THE FINANCE OFFICER T.M. BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR 5. THE PRINCIPAL SABOUR COLLEGE, SABOUR, DISTT. BHAGALPUR 6. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF BIHAR, MAIN SECRETARIAT, PATNA 7. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPTT. OF FINANCE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, MAIN SECRETARIAT, PATNA 8. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 9. THE DIRECTOR DEPTT. OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA ----------- 2 19.02.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the respondent-University. The case of the petitioner is that he superannuated from the post of lecturer on 30th June, 2008 in the department of English at Sabour College, Sabour under the respondent University, however after his retirement petitioner was allowed promotion retrospectively and promoted to the post of Reader, however the consequences of such promotion has not been given to the petitioner including the revision of pensionary benefits. Mr. Anil Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-University submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.3 with a copy to the respondent no.2. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and admitted dues could also be paid along with statutory interest. Upon consideration, if any of the claims or part of the claim is found not admissible, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)