IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN FRIDAY, THE 24TH APRIL 2009 / 4TH VAISAKHA 1931 WP(C).No. 12464 of 2009(C) PETITIONER: ------------------ CYRUS K.S., HSST (MATHS), LEO XII TH HSS, ALLEPPEY, AGED 39,S/O. K.M.SAMUEL, KOTTUNGAL, KATTOOR P.O., ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.PAULSON THOMAS RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE CORPORATE MANAGEMENT OF SCHOOLS, DIOCESE OF ALLEPPEY, ALAPPUZHA - REPRESENTED BY THE CORPORATE MANAGER. 5. ROMALD K.V., HSST (HINDI), (PRINCIPAL SELECTEE), HOLY FAMILY HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KATTOOR, ALAPPUZHA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BENNY GERVACIS FOR R1 TO R3. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.K.MOHANAN, J. --------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No. 12464 of 2009 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of April, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is an aspirant for appointment to the post of Principal at Holy Family Higher Secondary School, Kattoor. According to him, he is working as H.S.S.T.(Maths) in Leo XIIIth H.S.S. under the fourth respondent- management. The Holy Family Higher Secondary School, Kattoor is also coming under the same management. According to the petitioner, he has got a better claim than the fifth respondent, but overlooking his claim, the fourth respondent appointed the fifth respondent against the provisions contained in Chapter XXXII of K.E.R. Hence, he approached this Court preferring the above writ petition. 2. Raising the above grievance of the petitioner, he had already approached the second respondent by filing Ext.P2. In the above writ petition, though he had sought for several reliefs, alternatively he had prayed for a direction for disposal of Ext.P2 representation. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner a well as the learned Government Pleader. WP(C) NO.12464 of 2009 :-2-: 4. Since Ext.P2 is pending before the second respondent, I am of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 representation. 5. In the result, there will be a direction to the second respondent to take up Ext.P2 and after giving opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as respondents 4 and 5, to dispose of Ext.P2 within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment by the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. V.K.Mohanan, Judge MBS/ WP(C) NO.12464 of 2009 :-3-: V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. -------------------------------------------- Crl.A.NO. OF 200 -------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T WP(C) NO.12464 of 2009 :-4-: DATED: -3-2009