CLCON No.189 of 2005 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Shri Lok Pal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Munish Bhardwaj, Advocate holding brief of Shri Pankaj Kaushik, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This Contempt Petition has been filed by the petitioner for punishing the respondents for committing contempt of this Court’s order dated 14.05.2002 passed by this Court in Testamentary Case no.2 of 2001 (Old no.30 of 2000). Order passed by this Court on 14.05.2002 in Testamentary Case no.2 of 2001 is reproduced below: “The will in question is in dispute and probate proceedings are pending. Now Administrator General for the State of Uttaranchal has been appointed. He will look after the management of the property. The interim order against the respondent shall continue. Sd/- C.J. 14.05.2002” Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though vide order dated 14.05.2002, the Administrator General for the State of Uttaranchal was asked to look after the management of the property, but in violation of the said order, the respondent no.1 is operating the bank account in respect of said property. He also submitted that respondent no.2 is permitting the respondent no.1 to operate the said bank account. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not point out the documents, which could suggest that the respondent no.2 permitted the respondent no.1 to operate the account in question. I do not find any document in the Contempt Petition, by which it can be said that the order passed by this Court is violated. Therefore, the Contempt Petition is liable to be dismissed. The Contempt Petition is dismissed. Contempt notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged. (V.K. Bist, J.) Arpan 24.05.2011