IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8980 of 2011 BIRENDRA YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 28.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Admittedly, Tekari P.S. Case No.195 of 2010 was registered under bailable section except section 27 of the Arms Act which was applicable against co-accused Ramjanam Yadav. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that after investigation police submitted charge sheet under Section 307 and other minor sections of the I.P.C. as well as 27 of the Arms Act. It is further pointed out by him that there is allegation of giving Bhala blow to informant against the petitioner, but as a matter of fact no such injury has been found by the doctor in course of examination of the injured of this case, and moreover, there is case and counter case between the parties. From perusal of impugned order of learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya, it appears that injured has received two injuries on his chest and the learned Additional Sessions 2 Judge has observed that the aforesaid injuries were dangerous to life, but Annexure-3 of this petition reveals that at para-31 of the case diary the nature of injury has not been mentioned. Moreover, it has not been stated by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya as to under which circumstances the aforesaid injuries became dangerous to the life of the informant. Taking into consideration the above stated submissions as well as facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Birendra Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No.195 of 2010. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)