Cr.M.M.O. No. 118 of 2010 05.07.2010 Present: Mr. Subash Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for the respondent. The primary prayer of the petitioner in this case is that he be given an opportunity to engage counsel as the counsel representing all the accused could not represent him because of conflict of interests. The learned Trial Court by its order dated 26th June, 2010 has rejected the application of the petitioner herein for adjournment of the case. Though the facts as stated in the application are not born out from the record (which in fact should have been), yet I have accepted the statement of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the counsel representing petitioner herein before the trial court has conflict of interest. In these circumstances, this petition is disposed of with direction that the learned Trial Court shall proceed with the trial after granting an opportunity to the petitioner herein to engage another counsel. A direction is also issued that the case shall be proceeded with expeditiously. Needless to say that during which period this petition remained pending in this Court, the petitioner has/had ample opportunity to engage a counsel. A direction is issued that the petitioner shall appear before the learned Trial Court on 26th July, 2010 on which date, the case shall proceed further in accordance with law. This petition is accordingly disposed of. July 05, 2010 (Dev Darshan Sud), (KRS) Judge