IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 15999 of 2006 Between: K.Rama Subba Rao S/o.Hanumaiah R/o.D.No.9-1-68, Station road, Narsaraopet, Guntur District licence of M/s.Srinvarasiddhi Vinayaka Bar and Restaurant ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of AP., rep.by its Secretary, Revenue(Exicse-I) Department, Secretariat,Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner for Prohibition and Excise, Nampally, Hyderabad 3 The Deputy Commissioner Proh & Excise, guntur 4 The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent Narasaraopet, Guntur District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in insisting the petitioner to provide RCC Roof as per Rule 6(1)(i)(a) of the A.P.Excise (Grant of Lincese of selling by Bar and conditions of license) Rules, 2006 as amended by G.O.Ms.No.596 dated 26.5.2006 is illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to the orders passed in WP.No.12067 of 2006 dated 30.6.2006 and consequently direct the respondents to grant Form-2B Licence to the petitioner without reference to the amended Rule contained in G.o.Ms.No.596 Revenue (Ex.II) Department dated 26.5.2006 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.JAGANNATHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner does not wish to pursue the Writ Petition. Recording the submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The interim order granted by this Court on 1.8.2006 stands dissolved. There shall be no order as to costs. GODA RAGHURAM, J Date: 31.7.2008 cvm