IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 13TH JANUARY 2009 / 23RD POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 1243 of 2009(W) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.R.RAJENDRAN AGED 63 YEARS, S/O. K.I. RAMACHANDRAN, KOLASSERY, POOYAPPILLY, VADAKKEKARA P.O., NORTH PARUR,R/O OF KOVILAKATHAMANA, SOUTH VELLARAPILLY, SREEMOOLANAGARAM, ALUVA 683 580 BY ADV. SRI.S.MURALI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF SURVEYAND LAND RECORDS, COLLECTORATE, ERNAKULAM. 3. THASILDR, ALUVA TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, ALUVA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No. 1243 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 13th day of January, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that seeking correction of mistakes that crept into the re-survey records in relation to his properties, he filed Ext.P10 before the 2nd respondent. According to him, despite having made Ext.P2, on 15th December, 2008, the 2nd respondent has not so far considered Ext.P10 and passed orders thereon. It is in these circumstances the writ petition is filed. 2. If, as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P10 has been filed and the same has been received by the 2nd respondent, there is no reason why the 2nd respondent should not consider the request made in Ext.P10. Therefore, it is directed that if Ext.P10 has been received and is pending, the second respondent shall consider the same and pass orders thereon. This shall be /2/ done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ /2/