IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 1662 of 2008 Date of decision: 02.06.2010 Kavi Raj and others … Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others … Respondents Coram : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 to 4. V.K. Ahuja, J. (Oral): Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter may be referred to the Government for consideration of the contents of the writ petition as a representation and the matter may be decided accordingly by the State Government. A copy of the writ petition shall be presented before the Principal Secretary (Education), to the Govt. of H.P., within two weeks from today and he shall consider the representation of the petitioners keeping in view the services of other respondents, who may be similarly placed and the said representation shall be decided within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation and the decision shall be conveyed to the petitioners. The Principal Secretary (Education) 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? . 2 shall consider the question of the petitioners qua respondents No. 4 to 7, who are alleged to be similarly placed and their case shall also be considered accordingly by the Principal Secretary (Education). The petitioners if aggrieved by the order passed by the Principal Secretary (Education), to the Govt. of H.P., they are at liberty to challenge the same by way of filing writ petition. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of. Copy Dasti. ( V.K. Ahuja ), June 02, 2008 Judge (BSS) 3