IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1378 of 2010 1. JITENDRA KUAMR 2. SANTOSH KUMAR 3. ARVIND KUMAR @ ARBIND SINGH 4. GUDDU KUMAR, ALL SONS OF LATE RAM BAHADUR SINGH @ BAHADUR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RUKANPURA, BAILEY ROAD, P.S. DANAPUR NEW RUPASHPUR, DISTRICT PATNA. ---- PETITIONERS Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH SRI A. MUKHERJEE, THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. SRI JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM- COLLECTOR, PATNA. 3. SRI AADARSH CHITRAMARE, THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DANAPUR, PATNA. 4. SHRI SHIV RANJAN, THE CIRCLE OFFICER, DANAPUR, PATNA. ----- OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 5 27.10.2010 The petitioners are aggrieved by the fact that the Circle Officer has passed an order which indicates that the lands of Jamabandi No. 50 which are in the name of his grandmother have been sold as per the report of the Halka Karamchari. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the report is annexed as Annexure-B wherein it is mentioned that the Halka Karamchari came to know that the lands of Jamabandi No. 50 have been sold to a third party. The finding is that the petitioner is not in possession of the said lands. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that this report of the Halka Karamchari is behind the back of the petitioners. This Court cannot decide on the merits of the orders passed by the Circle Officer or the Halka Karamchari. However, petitioners would have the liberty to challenge the enquiry and the order of the Circle Officer by filing a writ application. 2 This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)