IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.322 of 2007 MOHAN SHARMA, S/O LATE KAPIL DEO SHARMA, R/O VILLAGE-CHATAR, P.O. HATI, P.S.-KAKO, DISTRICT-JEHANABAD. -PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE SECRETARY ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, BISWASARAIYA BHAWAN, PATNA. 2. SHRI RAJ KUMAR SINGH, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY COMMISSION- CUM-SECRETARY, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT BISWASARAIYA BHAWAN, PATNA. 3. SRI KISHORE RANJAN SINHA, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF-CUM-ADDITONAL COMMISSIONER-CUM-SPECIAL SECRETARY, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. SRI SUBRAT SARKAR, S/O LATE S.C. SARKAR, THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 5. SRI SUDARSHAN RAM, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, PRESENTLY THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RURAL ENGINEERING ORGANISATION (R.E.O.) WORK DIVISION, HILSA, UNDER THE DISTRICT OF NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIEF. -OPPOSITE PARTIES. 3 12.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. From the averments made in the show cause and the order dated 13th June, 2007, contained in Annexure-A to the show cause of opposite party no.4, it is clear that order of the writ Court has been fully complied. Petitioners want the respondents to pay interest 2 also on the monetary benefits. This relief has not been ordered by the writ Court. Hence, no case for contempt is made out. This application for contempt is finally disposed of. (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ.) AAhmad