AB 1657/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.K. MUSAHARY Heard Mrs. K.K.Choudhury, learned counsel for the accused/petitioner and Mr. K.Munir, learned Addl.P.P,Assam. Case diary has been produced. From the C.D. it appears that there is some rivalry between the informant and th e petitioner’s wife . Although the informant was stated to be raped by the accus ed/petitioner she was not sent for medical examination. Moreover, the alleged of fence took place on 22.5.11 at about 9 p.m. and the FIR was lodged on 24.5.11 i. e. after 2 days. But no explanation has been given for lodging the FIR after 2 d ays. The prosecution also recorded no reason for not sending the informant-vic tim woman for medical examination. In view of the above, I find that it is a fit case for granting pre-arre st bail to the accused/petitioner. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused/p etitioner Shri Hitesh Das,he shall be enlarged on bail of Rs. 15,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority i n connection with Mukalmua P.S. Case No. 120/2011 under Sections 447/376/34 IPC on conditions that he shall appear before the I.O. in person within 7 days from today for interrogation and recording his statement and he shall appear before the I.O. as and when required. Petition stands disposed of.