:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.722 OF 2008 PETITION NO.722 OF 2008 PETITION NO.722 OF 2008 Avisha Gopalkrishnan and ors. ..Petitioners. Vs. VIBGYOR High School and ors. ..Respondents. Mr. J.P. Cama,Sr.Advocate with Mr Mihir Desai for the Petitioners. Mr. Janak Dwarkadas.Sr.Advocate with Mr.D.J. Khambata, Sr. Advocate, Snehal Shah i/by M/s. Viraj Miniyar & Associates for the Respondent No.1. Mr. Vinod Bobde, Sr.Advocate with N.H. Seervai,Sr.Advocate, Pratik Seksaria i/by i/by Nivit Srivastava for the Respondent No.2. Mr. Pradip Jadhav, AGP. for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4. ......... WITH WITH WITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION LODGING NO.511 OF 2009 PETITION LODGING NO.511 OF 2009 PETITION LODGING NO.511 OF 2009 WITH WITH WITH NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2809 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO.2809 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO.2809 OF 2008 AND AND AND NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.286 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO.286 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO.286 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION LODGING NO.511 OF 2009 PETITION LODGING NO.511 OF 2009 PETITION LODGING NO.511 OF 2009 Leena Karia and ors. ...Petitioners. Vs. VIBGOUR High School and ors. ...Respondents. Ms. Rajani Iyer,Sr. Advocate with Rui Rodrigues i/by Sagar Talekar for the petitioner. Mr. V.A. Bobde,Sr.Advocate i/y M/s. Viraj Maniyar & Associates for the Respondent No.1. ....... Appearance in Notice of Motions Ms. Rajani Iyer, Sr. Advocate i/by D.J. Khambata, Sr.Advocate, with Snehal Shah i/by Viraj Maniyar & Associastes for the Respondent No.1. Mr. N.H. Seervai, Sr.Advocate with Pratik Seksaria i/by Nivit Srivastava for the Respondent No.2. ....... :2: CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATE : 20th April, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Both the petitions on motion made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners permitted to be withdraw. Interim orders, if any, operating stand vacated. The learned counsel appearing for the Dy. Director states that the Dy. Director will pass a reasoned order on the complaint dated 19.7.2007 made by the petitioners, which is marked as Exh.G at Page 138 to the reply filed by the respondent No.1. Statement accepted. In view of this statement, following order is made. ORDER ORDER ORDER 1. The petitioners shall be at liberty to submit any additional submissions/material they want to rely on, in support of their complaint with a copy to the respondent No.1 within a period of two weeks from today. The respondent No.1 shall be at liberty to make further submissions including response of the respondent No.1 to the additional submissions of the petitioners within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the additional submissions from the petitioners. The Dy. Director thereafter shall take the entire material produced before him for consideration and make reasoned :3: order and communicate the same to the parties within a period of six weeks from the receipt of the submissions from both the sides. By consent of the parties, it is directed that, it is not necessary for the Dy. Director to grant oral hearing to the parties. The parties to the petitions shall be at liberty to adopt appropriate remedy against the order of the Dy. Director that will me made. It is made clear that, according to the petitioners, the complaint referred to above is the only complaint made and it is to be decided by the Dy.Director and till it is decided by the Dy. Director, the petitioners would not approach to any authority. We make it clear that we have vacated the interim order which was operating and therefore, fees shall be paid as per the revised fee structure. However, recovery of the fees shall be subject to the order of the Dy. Director. 2. Both the petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn. 3. In view of the above order, notice of motions are disposed off. ( D.K. DESHMUKH, J.) (R. S. MOHITE, J.)