IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 20TH OCTOBER 2009 / 28TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 28495 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MANOJ MATHEW, L.D. STORE KEEPER, S/O. T. MATHEW, AGED 30 YEARS, TITUS II TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, TIRUVALLA. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 4. THE MANAGER, TITUS II TEACHERS, TRAINING COLLEGE , THIRUVALLA. 5. THE PRINCIPAL, TITUS II TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, THIRUVALLA. 6. SRI. JAMES T. UMMEN, L.D. CLERK (UNDER ORDERS OF PROMOTION AS U.D. CLERK, TITUS II TEACHERS,TRAINING COLLEGE, THIRUVALLA. 7. SRI. C. SABU MON, LOWER DIVISION CLERK (UNDER ORDERS OF PROMOTION AS U.D CLERK), TITUS TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, THIRUVALLA. R1 TO R3 BY G.P. SHRI MOHAMOOD T.T. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.28495 of 2009-F - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 20th day of October, 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioner is working as L.D. Store Keeper in the Titus III Teachers Training College, Thiruvalla which is an aided college. He entered service on 25.5.2006 along with respondents 6 and 7. After completion of his probation, the petitioner requested for promotion as U.D.C., but that was not acceded to. Ext.P2 is the order issued by the second respondent directing the Principal to effect promotion to the post of U.D.C. by applying 1 : 1 ratio in between L.D. Clerk and L.D. Store Keeper. Again, the petitioner made a representation as per Ext.P3 to the Director seeking his interference. In the meanwhile, respondents 6 and 7 were granted promotion as U.D. Clerk and the proposals were sent to the Director for approval. The petitioner, after filing Ext.P4 representation, has approached this court by filing W.P.(C) No.2546/2009 and by Ext.P5 judgment, this court directed the Director to pass orders within a time limit. Ext.P6 is the order passed by the Director declining the claim of the petitioner. Against Ext.P6, the petitioner has filed Ext.P7 representation before the first respondent which is pending. wpc 28495/2009 2 2. Learned Govt. Pleader on getting instructions submits that Ext.P7 has been received and is pending before the first respondent. There will be a direction to the first respondent to take a decision on Ext.P7 after hearing the petitioner and respondents 4 to 7, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/