FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. District : Latur Criminal Application No. 3082 of 2011 (In Criminal Appeal Stamp No. 366/2011) (Pandurang s/o. Bhimrao Mahal Vs. Manoj s/o. Uttam Dive & 3 others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders ............................................................................. Mr. Ashok R. Tapse, Advocate, holding for Mr. Prashant D. Suryawanshi, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Manale, Advocate, for respondent nos.1 to 3. Mr. S.G. Nandedkar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent no.4. ............................................................................. CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATE : 8TH NOVEMBER 2011 1. Heard learned respective Counsel for the parties. 2. This is an application preferred by the original complainant for condonation of delay of 8 days caused in filing accompanying Criminal Appeal against the order of acquittal. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders 3. For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. Moreover, the said delay does not appear to be willful, deliberate or intentional and, therefore, the same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4. In the result, Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B" and delay of 8 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Appeal, stands condoned, and accompany Criminal Appeal be numbered. Present Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE) JUDGE bgp/ka3082