Civil Revision No. 1459 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1459 of 2009 Date of decision: 12.08.2010 Chandgi Ram .....Petitioner Versus Satbir and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present: - Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. Hari Om Attri, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** VINOD K. SHARMA, J (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 22.7.2008, passed by the learned Courts below, vide which the application moved by applicant-respondent under Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been allowed and the petitioner has been directed, to hand back the possession taken under the decree, which was subsequently set aside. The plaintiff/petitioner filed a suit against predecessor-in- interest of the respondents, after his death i.e. against a dead person. The suit was decreed ex parte. In pursuance of the decree, the petitioner took possession of the property in possession of the legal representatives of the deceased/defendant. The respondents moved application under Section 144 CPC for restitution of possession, after the ex parte decree was set aside, and the suit filed against the dead person was dismissed. Civil Revision No. 1459 of 2009 -2- The learned Court below held, that there was no decree in favour of the petitioner. Therefore, he was liable to hand back the possession taken by him under a decree, which was subsequently set aside on the application moved by the respondents under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The order passed, being in consonance with law, does not call for any interference by this Court in exercise of revisional jurisdiction. No merit. Dismissed. (Vinod K. Sharma) Judge August 12, 2010 R.S.