1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.682 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST.)NO.14203 OF 2006 Jasbirsingh Amriksingh Anand .. Applicant V/s. Chief Goods Supervisor, Central Railway, Nashik & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.H.E.Palwe for the Appellant/Applicant. None for the Respondents. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2008. P.C. By the above Civil Application, the Applicant prays for restoration of the Second Appeal which has been dismissed on account of the conditional order dated 16th August, 2006 of the 2 learned Additional Registrar of this Court, by which order which the Advocate for the Applicant was directed to remove the office objection within the time stipulated in the said order, failing which the Appeal was to automatically stand dismissed for non prosecution. According to the learned counsel for the Applicant, the office objection is only limited to the filing of the decree passed by the Trial Court, the learned counsel further submits that the decree would be filed within the time that would be stipulated by this court. Hence, for the reasons stated in the Civil Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'a'. 2. The Civil Application is, accordingly, disposed of. 3. The learned counsel for the Applicant to file the decree of the Trial Court within four 3 weeks from date. 4. Place the Second Appeal for admission in the week commencing 20th October, 2008. In case the decree has not been filed within the time stipulated by this order, the Appeal would again stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court. [R.M.SAVANT, J.]