IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 27063 of 2003 Between: K.Sudarshan, S/o.K.V.N.Chari, Oil Rigs Department (MPC), Bharat Heavy Electriclas Ltd., Ramachandrapuram,Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Executive Director, Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Power Sector, Southern Region, 474, Annasalai, Nandanam, Chennai-600035. 2 The Deputy General Manager, Human Resources Management, Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Power Sector, Southern Region, 474, Annasalai, Nandanam, Chennai-600035. 3 The General Manager, Human Resources Management, Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Ramachandrapuram, Hyderabad-32. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of " writ of Mandamus" directing the respondents:- a) to refix the pay of the petitioner in terms of revised pay scale of 2000 w.e.f.1-1-2000 and place him in the scale of Rs.16530- 550-18300 forthwith and pay arrears of salary w.e.f.1-1-2000 till refixation of the pay of the petitioner. b) to promote the petitioner to the post of senior Engineer w.e.f. 25- 06-2001 when he completed 4 years of requisite service at the level of Engineer and place him at appropriate pay attached to the post of senior Engineer and also pay arrears of salary by fixing his scale in terms of Revised pay scales- 2000. c) to pay difference of 25% of the subsistence Allowance for the period from 24-07-1998 to 31-10-2002 consequent upon his reinstatement along with Basic and D.A.and House Rent Allowance w.e.f. 1-7-1999 along with city compensation allowance and electrical charges and other incidental benefits. d) to regularise the period of suspension i.e. 24-7-1998 to 31-10-2000 by treating the same as spent on duty and other incidental benefits. by declaring denial of the above benefits as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.SATYA PRASAD Counsel for the RespondentS : MR.S.V.BHATT The Court made the following : ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Tata Babu, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as ‘infructuous’. No order as to costs. ---------------------------------- V.Eswaraiah,J 28th July,2004. Stp .. Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Executive Director, Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Power Sector, Southern Region, 474, Annasalai, Nandanam, Chennai-600035. 2 The Deputy General Manager, Human Resources Management, Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Power Sector, Southern Region, 474, Annasalai, Nandanam, Chennai-600035. 3 The General Manager, Human Resources Management, Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Ramachandrapuram, Hyderabad-32. 4. 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{ } THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 27063 of 2003 28TH July,2004.