1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3604 OF 2008 IN APPEAL NO. 534 OF 2006 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1247 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO. 1172 OF 2005 Dy. Salt Commissioner & Anr. ... ...Appellants. (Orig. Defendant Nos.1 & 2) Versus Vikas Kamalakar Walawalkar & Anr. ... ...Respondents. Mr. S. R. Rajguru with Ms. Nisha Valani i/by Mr. S.S.Sarker for the Appellants. Mr. S.U.Kamdar, Sr.Counsel with Mr. H.C.Pimple i/by Mr. V. K. Khatu & Ors., for Mumbai Municipal Corporation. Mr. D. D. Madan, Sr.Counsel, with Mr. Rohan Rajadhyaksha i/by M/s. Mahimtura & Co. for Respondent No.1. CORAM: J. N. PATEL and R. G. KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 8TH MAY, 2009. (In Chamber at 2.30 p.m.) P. C. : Heard learned Counsel appearing for the parties. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for the parties tender minutes of meeting held between the respondents on 30th March, 2009. The same is taken on record and marked “X” for identification purpose. 2 3. In view of the said minutes of meeting, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 4. The minutes of the meeting be read as part of the order. 5. In so far as right to claim compensation by the appellants is concerned, the same will be decided at the time of the final hearing of the appeal. Sd/- (J. N. PATEL, J.) Sd/- (R. G. KETKAR, J.)