IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 13TH MARCH 2008 / 23RD PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 8555 of 2008(R) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ C.VAMADEVAN NAIR ANOOJ BHAVAN, ARUMALOOR, KANDALA PO, KUVALASEI VIA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695 512. BY ADV. SRI.P.SANTHALINGAM SRI.S.SHARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, SECRETARY TO GOVT PANCHAYAT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. VENGANOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT VENGANOOR TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT REP. BY THE SECRETARY. 3. UDAYACHANDRAN BABU, S/O. RAMANKUTTY NAIR, ARCHANA, PANANGOD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY G.P. SRI..J.MUHAMMED ANJAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 8555 of 2008 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of March , 2008 JUDGMENT Even though the learned counsel for the petitioner has addressed me very strenuously assailing Ext.P6 order of the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions, I am not able to agree that Ext.P6 is vitiated to the extent of requiring correction at the hands of this court in judicial review. After all it is only an order of remand that has been passed by the Tribunal. Pursuant to Ext.P6, the Panchayat will be taking fresh decision. 2. I dispose of this Writ Petition directing the Panchayat to hear the petitioner also apart from hearing the third respondent while taking decision pursuant to Ext.P6. The third respondent is reminded that any constructions, which he may make before the Panchayat takes fresh decision pursuant to Ext.P6, will be at his risk and subject to the decision which the Panchayat takes as ordered by the Tribunal and as endorsed by this court. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. dpk