IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20972 of 2011 DINESH KUMAR S/O SHRI PREMCHAND MAHATO R/O VILLAGE BHASWAR, P.S. BIBHUTIPUR, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR ……….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT BUILDING, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT BUILDING, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SAMASTIPUR 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SAMASTIPUR 6. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR 7. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, (ESTABLISHMENT) SAMASTIPUR 8. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, BIBHUTIPUR, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR 9. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, SURAULI GRAM PANCHAYAT, UNDER BIBHUTIPUR BLOCK, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR 10. THE MUKHIYA, SURAULI GRAM PANCHAYAT, BLOCK BIBHUTIPUR, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR ………….Respondents ---------------------------------- 2. 30.11.2011 The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order vide Memo No. 246 dated 07.03.2011 (Annexure-6) issued by the District Superintendent of Education, Samastipur, directing to terminate the services of some Panchayat teachers including the petitioner on the ground that they have obtained their degrees from unrecognized institutions. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that subsequently, a three member committee has inquired into the matter, pursuant to which the list of unrecognized institutions has been issued on 15.10.2011 as contained in Annexure-8 to the writ petition. It is on this basis that the petitioner apprehends his termination. Learned counsel for the petitioner however, invites attention to the State Government’s recent letter dated 27.11.2010 granting recognition to the institution concerning the petitioner, namely Bhagwan Budh Primary Teachers’ Education College, Bajrahia, Siwan. Learned counsel for the State appears and has been heard. This Court is of the opinion that the ends of justice will be met if the petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.5 within a period of two weeks hereof. Such representation, if filed, shall be disposed of by a speaking order after hearing the petitioner and in accordance with law. Regard shall be had to the aforesaid letter dated 27.11.2010 (Annexure-9) before taking any final decision in the matter of termination of the petitioner. Such order shall be passed expeditiously preferably within a period of two months hereof. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Fahad. ( Vikash Jain, J. )