: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.369 OF 2007 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4720 OF 2003 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4649 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1689 OF 2003 Mamata Chaturbhuj Rijhwani & Anr. ... Appellants V/s. Chaturbhuj @ Babu Khimandas Rijhwani ... Respondent Mr.Ms.Seema Sarnaik for Appellants Mr.H.E. Palwe for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: DECEMBER 19, 2009 P.C.: Ms.Sarnaik, appearing for the Petitioner, in the contempt petition states that the order of November 13, 2009 has been complied by the respondent except for the deposit of the fine. Mr.Palwe appearing for the respondent states that inadvertently the fine was not deposited as directed. He seeks an extension of time to deposit the fine. The fine shall be deposited within a week from today. 2. Since the respondent has complied with the aforesaid directions and orders of this Court, the non-bailable warrant is cancelled. However, it is made clear that the respondent shall abide by the undertakings which have been given by him in para 6 contained in his affidavit filed in November 2009 and which have been accepted by this Court. 3. The Contempt Petition is disposed of accordingly. 4. The First Appeal to be detagged from the Contempt Petition and to be heard in its normal course.