IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 578 OF 2011 COMMUNIDADE OF SANCOALE THROUGH ITS ATTORNEY., SHRI SATISH J. NARVEKAR ... Petitioner Versus ZUARI INDUSTRIES LIMITED COMPANY THROUGH ITS COMPANY SECRETARY AND 16 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. H.D. Naik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Devidas Pangam, Advocate for respondent no.1. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 16th September, 2011 P.C. Heard Shri H.D. Naik, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Shri S. D. Lotlikar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent no.1. 2. After hearing the matter for sometime, Shri H. D. Naik, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the above petition with liberty to challenge the impugned order in case any adverse decree is passed against the petitioner at the time of the disposal of the suit. He further seeks liberty to file an appropriate application before the learned Judge to lead rebuttal evidence in answer to the evidence of the respondents. 3. Considering that the evidence of the respondents is in progress before the learned Judge, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the above petition with liberty as prayed for. All contentions raised by the parties are left open. 4. In case the petitioner files an application for rebuttal evidence before the learned Judge, the same shall be considered by the learned Judge after hearing the respondents in accordance with law. 5. Subject to the above, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. F. M. REIS, J. at*