IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 14TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 23RD KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 30181 of 2011(W) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- PRADEEP SEBASTIAN, MANJAKUNNEL, MUNDANKAL P.O., PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 574. BY ADV. SRI.UNNI. K.K. (EZHUMATTOOR) RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY PRIYADARSINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM - 686 001. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY PRIYADARSINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM - 686 001. 3. PRO-VICE CHANCELELOR MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY PRIYADARSINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM - 686 001. BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI SC., MG UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs WPC. NO.30181/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE MARKS LIST DATED 18/03/2010 FOR REGISTER NO.30645. P2: COPY OF THE PROVISIONAL CERTIFICATE DATED 14/05/2010 WITH FOLIO NO.8177. P3: COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON 31/01/2011 TO THE 3RD RESPODENT. P4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED TO THE 3RD RESPODENT WITH COPY TO THE 1ST RESPODENT. P5: COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 30181 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Tech degree course. According to the petitioner except the paper Signals and Systems of 4th Semester, he passed all subjects. By the time he made application for revaluation, the time prescribed for such application had expired. Therefore he made Ext.P5 representation to the 3rd respondent, requesting for a special revaluation. The said representation was not considered, hence this writ petition. 2. From the facts submitted it is seen that initially by a mistake committed by the University, petitioner was issued certificates to the effect that he has passed the examination, on finding out the mistake, the University recalled the mark lists. It is in such circumstances that the alleged delay has occurred. Having regard to these facts, W.P.(C) No. 30181 OF 2011 :2 : the request made by the petitioner as per Ext.P5 representation deserves consideration. Therefore I direct the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P5 within two weeks of receipt of a copy of this judgment and if his request is allowed, the application for revaluation will be considered on that basis. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-