1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.1970 of 2009 in CRI.R.A.NO. 264/2009 (Sindutai Vs. Madhukar) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. N.V.Gaware, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. K.M.Suryawanshi, APP for respondent. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 18/9/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard both the Counsel. 2. There is delay of 190 days caused in filing Criminal Revision Application, challenging the judgment and order dt.9.9.2008, recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Ahmednagar, acquitting the accused. The complainant feels aggrieved by the manner in which the order is passed. The delay is not - 2 deliberate. It is condoned. Application allowed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/1970-09crapl