hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3231 OF 2010 Ketan A.Shah ... Petitioner Versus Samir D. Sanghvi and anr. ... Respondents Ms. Seema Chettri iby M/s. Niranjan & Co., Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.K. Singh iby Mr. I.B. Singh for respondent no. 1. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. DATED : AUGUST 22, 2011 P.C. The leaned counsel seeks accommodation. The counsel for the respondent opposes the same. I have gone through the record. I find that the learned Metropolitan Magistrate refused to refer the document i.e. delivery challan to handwriting expert. The petitioner claims that the delivery challan is fake and bogus. However, primarily signature of petitioner on the delivery challan and his report before the police match to its particulars. No interference is called for. Writ Petition dismissed. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)