-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.8759 OF 2004 NO.8759 OF 2004 NO.8759 OF 2004 Smt Mamata A. Patil ... Petitioner v/s State of Maharashtra and anr. ... Respondents Mr S. Gole for Petitioner. Mr M.H. Solkar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 20TH JULY 2005. -2- P.C. :- 1. Admittedly, there is no contract in favour of the petitioner which would entitle him to continue to occupy the Government land. If according to the petitioner, he was entitled to the grant of contract, his remedy was to institute his own proceedings for getting such a declaration and further appropriate order. The petitioner admittedly has not adopted those remedies. Therefore, the authorities were perfectly justified in evicting him from the Government premises. I do not think that the order impugned has resulted in failure of justice so as to entitle this Court to interfere with the same. Petition is rejected. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Personal Secretary of this Court as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. --------------------