IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 24TH APRIL 2009 / 4TH VAISAKHA 1931 WP(C).No. 10869 of 2009(Q) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- D.K.MOHANAN,AGED 52, S/O.KUMARAN,PUSHPA NIVAS, KANNOTHUMCHAL,CHOWA.P.O.,KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR) SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE KIZHAKKAMBALAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY SECRETARY,HOME AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS,VAZHUTHACADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANNUR TOWN POLICE STATION,KANNUR. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANNUR TOWN POLICE STATION,KANNUR. 5. SUGANDHA MOHAN,D/O.P.VIJAYAN, INSURANCE CONSULTANT,MET LIFE INSURANCE PVT.LTD., NEAR TRAINING SCHOOL,SOUTH BAZAR,KANNUR. 6. ANIL,MANAGER, ING VYSYA BANK, SOUTH BAZAR,KANNUR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.V.T.K.MOHANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ----------------------------- W.P.C.No.10869 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of April 2009 ------------------------------------- O R D E R This writ petition is filed by the petitioner for the following reliefs: i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to make over investigation of crime No.669/08 of Kannur Town police station to any other agency conversant with investigation of matters relating to accounts swindling of money etc. ii) In the alternative to issue necessary directions by way of a writ of mandamus directing the Learned, Judicial First Class Magistrate, No.I Kannur to issue specific and clear directions to respondents 3 & 4 in Exhibit P3 petition, for conducting a proper and effective investigation of Exhibit P2 case. iii) To grant such other reliefs which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. W.P.C.No.10869/09 2 2. The gist of his complaint is that the 5th respondent, his wife, has forged his signature in some documents to claim insurance amount deposited by him in the name of his children. Complaint filed by him has not been properly investigated by the police is his grievance, for which he has approached the learned Magistrate. No serious consideration was given by the learned Magistrate to the application filed by the petitioner. He, therefore, has approached this court seeking the above reliefs by filing this writ petition. 3. The learned Public Prosecutor, after getting instructions, submits that the investigation over the crime has been completed and a charge has been laid against the 5th respondent, the wife of the petitioner and also the 6th respondent, Manager of a bank. The 5th respondent, wife of the accused was already arrested and W.P.C.No.10869/09 3 produced before court. The 6th respondent who is stated to be abroad could not be apprehended. Nothing more is required to be done as the investigation of the case is over and charge laid before court, submits the learned Public Prosecutor. The learned counsel for the petitioner, being satisfied by the steps taken by the police, has no further grievance. 4. This petition is closed. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE jsr W.P.C.No.10869/09 4