IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20193 of 2010 MD.EKHALAQUE ANWAR @ AHMAD SON OF MD. LAISH AZAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHEROKHRA, P.S. TAJPUR, DIST. SAMASTIPUR – PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR—OPP. PARTY. ----------- For the petitioner: Mukkesh Kumar No.3, Adv. For the Informant: Mr. Washi Ahmad Khan, Adv. For the State : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. ----- 2/ 15.06.2010 Heard the parties, including learned counsel for the informant. In a criminal prosecution for offences under sections 420, 409, 467, 468, 469 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code the petitioner who is a government teacher in a school is alleged to have forged two cheques of the headmistress of the School and is also alleged to have attempted to withdraw the money. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that even according to the prosecution case attempt is said to have been made for the purpose of withdrawal of money from the Bank in question, but no amount was withdrawn and this finding of fact has been recorded by the learned Sessions judge also in the impugned order. Learned counsel for the State and the informant have strongly opposed the prayer for bail but have not disputed the fact that money could not be withdrawn by the petitioner or any other accused on the basis of alleged - 2 - forged cheques. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Tajpur P.S.Case No. 383 of 2009. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J ) BTiwary/