IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2011 / 2ND POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 34874 of 2011(H) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- ANJALI M.N., AGED 24 YEARS, S/O. LATE C.K.VIJAYAKUMAR, DEVAKI KRISHNA BGAVAN, POST MUNDAYAD, KANNUR - 670 597, NOW RESIDING AT NO.3, FIRST FLOOR, GANDHIPURAM, NEAR GOVERNEMNT SCHOOL, WHITE FIELD MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 066. BY ADVS. SRI.R.SUDHISH SMT.M.MANJU SRI.RANJITH RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, REPRESENTED BY VICE CHANCELLOR, COCHIN UNIVERSITY P.O. KERALA - 682 022. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOY, COCHIN UNIVERSITY P.O., KOCHI, KERALA - 682 022. 3. THE REGISTRAR, THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, COCHIN UNIVERSITY P.O., KOCHI, KERALA - 682 022. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.M.J. RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 34874/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE CHALLAN RECEIPT OF SCRUTINY DATED 01/12/2011. P2: COPY OF THE CHALLAN RECEIPT OF REVALUATION DATED 01/12/11. P3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION WITH POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 02/12/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).34874/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioner applied for revaluation of one paper in the combined first and second semester B.Tech, Information Technology, Examination and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within six weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. 4.Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs