HIGHCQURTOyTHECHHATriSGARH AT BILA8PUR W.P. (81 No. 3833 of 2010 Petifciosier S.D. Tiwari, Aged about 59 l/a year's, S/o Lalla Ram Tiwari, Occupation- Ser^ice-Stib Divisional Officer, Dhourpiir East, Surguja, District Siirguja (C.G.) Versus Respondesats State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretaiy, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur(C,G,) Additional Secretary, Departiiient of Forest, D.K,S. Bhawan, Raipzir (C.G.) G.P. Dubey, S/o Late Girwar Prasad Dubey Aged about 55 years, Occupation Service Attached Officer, North Surguja, Forest . Division, District Surguja (C.G.) WMt_Petitaoa^^.CT_Article226_ofthejC^ist|tyUp^^ Mr, Vliiay Paodey, Advocate for the petitbner. Mr. U.N.S. Deo, Govt Advocate, for tiie State/respondents 1 & 2 ou advauce copy, ORAL ORDBR 126.07.2010) ^ Keard. LeaiTied counsel for tlie petitioner subraits tliat by order dated 15,7,2010, respoudent No.3 has been posted as S.D.0,, Forest Divlsion, Dhourpur, where tlie petitioner is akeady workitig, He submits tliat earlier tiie petitloner was trao.sferred froni Dhourpur to BJlaspur by order dated 30.6.2009 which fhe petitioner challenged in W.P.(S) No. 3381/2009. The said writ petition was disposed of by tliis Court vlde order dated 13.7.2009 aad it was du'ected tliat if tlie petitloiier malees a representation to respondent No. 1 witliio. a period ,,^r^ ^^^^,,^^^^s^^^^.t?^,i^&^^.^.:^^^^ W.P.fS^No. 3833 of?010 ^l of two weeks from the date of receipt of the orrler^ the ^ame woiilrl be decirilefl within a period ofthree week^ froYn the d?ite ofits Tiptceipt. Mr, Pandey siihTnit^ that accordingly tbe representRtion wes made and by orrier deterf 9»7.'2010, lit was allowed nnrl thfa tran^fer of the petitioner WRS cancelled anrt t1iie petititoner w^^ gwen joining Rt DhoTirpiir, East, Siirgiija, Forest nivision enri he is continiiing on the ^aid post till date, However he .siibmits that since no order h^s been pesserl for tmns>fer of the petitiorter ti11 d^te, he m^y be perroitted to withdrRW this petitioni Rt this stege with liberty to file RTiotlieT* petitior? if siiich an exigency arises in fi^tiire, ConsideriTig the facts end mrcinTi^tance of fhe c^i^e, permis^iors granted. Accordingly; writ petition is rlisposeri of ^is withrlrswn wifh the aforesaid liberty granted in favoiir of the petitioner- This order h^is be.cn passed m preseuce of the Govt. Arlvocate who is appe?iring on aflvance copy. He m^y take notice ofthe ^bove fect^ ^nd do the needfiil in the niatter. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge