IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 193 of 2009 With Stay Application No. 2284/2009 Smt. Munsarina W/o Waheed. …... Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. …... Respondents Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, G.A for respondent nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent no. 4. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, G.A for respondent nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent no. 4. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. On due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; the contents of the F.I.R; perusal of the medical report and the allegations made against the present petitioner; and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any good ground to grant relief to the petitioner as claimed in the petition. Therefore, the petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. Consequently, the stay application is also dismissed. 4. However, I am refraining from commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioner’s case at the trial, which is yet to start. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner referring to the medical certificate annexed as annexure 5 to the petition mentioning therein that the petitioner is suffering from Hepatitis (Jaundice) and advised bedrest for 1 to 1 ½ months approximately and apart from this the petitioner is a lady of 52 years age as alleged in the medical certificate as well as in the petition, submitted that the bail application of the petitioner may be directed to be disposed of expeditiously. 5. In view of above and under Section 437 Cr.P.C, I direct that if the petitioner appears/surrenders/brought before the trial court, her bail application will be disposed of expeditiously without waste of time. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 27.03.2009 V.K