IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. 631-M of 2008 Date of decision: 17.1.2008 Surender and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate for the petitioners. **** RAJESH BINDAL, J. This is a petition for anticipatory bail in FIR No. 368 dated December 07, 2007 registered under Sections 148, 149, 341, 506 IPC at Police Station, DLF Phase II, Gurgaon. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the paper book. The allegations against the petitioners are that they have illegally grabbed the property belonging to the complainant, which is undisputedly owned by her. From the material placed on record in the form of power of attorneys and agreement for construction, in my opinion, it is not a case where the petitioners were permitted to retain the possession of the property. Accordingly, in my opinion, it is not a fit case for grant of pre- arrest bail. The petition is dismissed. January 17, 2008 (Rajesh Bindal) Pka Judge