IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33356 of 2008 DILIP KUMAR JHA Versus STTAE OF BIHAR ----------- 6. 25.08.2009 Heard the counsel for the petitioner, the complainant and the counsel appearing for the state. Petitioner is husband of the complainant. The case has been instituted for offence u/Ss 323, 342, 494, 379 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code as well as section 3 read with section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. As per the allegation in the Complaint petition, the petitioner is responsible for torturing the complainant, demanding money and motorcycle and for deserting the complainant. Considering these facts, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner, Dilip Kumar Jha is rejected in connection with Complaint Case No. 279(C)/07. akv (Mridula Mishra, J.)