IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8869 of 2011 Chandrama Chaudhary, S/O-Late Jamadar Chaudhary Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 04 30.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. It would appear from perusal of the first information report that the name of petitioner as well as two other persons were given by the informant on the basis of suspicion. In course of investigation, it came to light that victim was seen in the company of petitioner and the above stated two other accused persons. Subsequently, the name of son of this petitioner also came in light in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is series of litigation between the parties before the alleged occurrence. It is contended by him that even if, the materials collected by the Investigating Officer assumed to be true, then also, it is a case of last seen only and having similar allegation, co-accused Rajkishore Singh as well as Vimal Choudhary have already been granted bail by different Benches of this Court Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalganj P.S. Case No. 264 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)