[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.822 OF 2007 Mr.Bharat Ruparel ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.R.U.Dholakia counsel for Applicant Mr.S.R.Shinde A.P.P. for the State Mr.Kartik Desai for Respondent Nos.2 to 6 ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : MARCH 13, 2007 DATE : MARCH 13, 2007 DATE : MARCH 13, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant-original accused, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 to 6 and the learned A.P.P. for the State. Respondent No.2 is the original complainant in C.R.No.15 of 2001 of GBCB CID. 2. The applicant is seeking quashing of C.R.No. 15 of 2001 and the proceedings in C.C.No.822/P/2003 which is pending before the learned Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 19th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai. The said case is under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC. [-2-] 3. The learned counsel for the Respondent No.2-original complainant has stated that the complainant and the applicant have amicably settled the dispute amongst themselves and she does not wish to proceed with the complaint. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent no.2-original complainant, I am inclined to grant the prayer of the applicant. Hence, C.R.No.15 of 2001 and the proceedings in C.C.No.822/P/2003 which is pending before the learned Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 19th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai, are quashed. 4. Application is disposed of. [ V.K.Tahilramani, J.]