1 cri appln 1038.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1038 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1037 OF 2010 Sunil S/o Ramdas Date .. Applicant Versus Rajendra Babanrao Maid .. Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1040 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1039 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1043 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1042 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1045 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1044 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1047 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1046 OF 2010 Shri A. S. Zarekar, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri S. N. Gaikwad, Advocate for the Respondent. 2 cri appln 1038.10 CORAM : S. S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 18TH JANUARY, 2010. PER COURT : . Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant and learned counsel appearing for the respondent. The counsel appearing for the respondent submits that he has instructions to appear in the matter and he will file vakalatnama within one week from today. The statement is accepted. 2. Upon hearing learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondent and upon perusal of the contents of the application for condonation of delay and more particularly para 3 of the said application, I am satisfied that, sufficient cause is shown for condonation of delay. The applications for condonation of delay are allowed in terms of prayer clause A and stands disposed of. [S. S. SHINDE, J.] bsb/Jan. 11