1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REV. APPLICATION NO.374 OF 2005 Suresh Pratap Keshwani .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.R.P.Lambay for Union of India Mr.S.S.Pednekar, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 24th November 2006. P.C. . Applicant and his Advocate are absent. 2. From a perusal of the order passed by 2 this Court on 5th December 2005, it is apparent that the charge has been framed by the trial court on 6th October 2005. Mr.Lambay appearing for respondent informs me that not only the charge has been framed but the trial has proceeded and about 14 witnesses have been examined by the prosecution. 3. No useful purpose will be served by going into rival contentions while refusing discharge of the applicant from the case. Revision application is, therefore, dismissed with liberty to applicant to raise all contentions as are permissible in law during the course of trial and learned Judge shall consider the same without being influenced by the impugned order. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)