IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.8014/2010 Liyakat Hussain Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 19/8/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Rinesh Gupta for the petitioner. Shri Piyush Kumar, P.P. for the State. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that allegation against the accused petitioner is that he caused injuries to Adnan, whereas all the three injuries found on his person are simple in nature. Injuries found on persons of Jahid and Sahid have been attributed to co-accused Yusuf and Ehsan and not to the present petitioner. That apart, the parties have compromised the matter and the complainant has given an affidavit to this effect to the Investigating Officer Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. However, he was not in a position to dispute the fact that the injuries sustained by Adnan allegedly caused by the petitioner are simple in nature. Having regard to the submissions made at the bar, the nature of accusation against the petitioner, the materials collected so far during the course of investigation and all other facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant the indulgence of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. In the result, this bail application u/S.438 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Liyakat Hussain S/o Nasir Mohammad in FIR No.70/2009, P.S. Sangod, District Kota, he shall be released on bail by the concerned SHO/Investigating Officer, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sureties of Rs.15,000/- each to his satisfaction on the following conditions: - 1) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; 2) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and 3) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. Thanvi