IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.201 OF 2008 (For condonation of delay) IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL ST. NO.29898 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3948 OF 2007 The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Applicants Vs. Smt. Mangala Bhaskar Jadhav .. Respondent Mr. A.P. Vanarse, Assistant Government Pleader for the appellant- State. Ms. Seema Sarnaik for the respondent. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.A. BOBDE, J. DATE : 17TH DECEMBER, 2008 P.C.: We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. Despite notice, no reply has been filed to this application. However, it is contended on behalf of the non-applicant that every day's delay has not been explained. Therefore, the delay should not be condoned. The learned Assistant Government Pleader relies upon the Division Bench judgment of this court to contend that the delay which has occurred in the present case is primarily because of the various authorities being involved in processing the cases and the procedure involved in the office. From the affidavit, we are satisfied that delay has been sufficiently explained. Consequently, application allowed. Delay condoned. List the Letters Patent Appeal for hearing on 14th January, 2009. Civil application stands disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE, J.