C.W. P. No. 6194 of 1989 *** Surata Ram ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & another ...Respondents *** Present : Mr. J. S. Manipur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged his termination of his services and sought reinstatement and consequent regularization. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner has told me that in fact after the impugned order of termination, the petitioner was reappointed in the year 1992 and he prays that this writ petition to that extent has been rendered infructuous and may be dismissed as such while giving opportunity to seek regularization in view of his subsequent appointment by filing a representation, in case required. Ordered accordingly. Dismissed as having become infructuous. March 24, 2009 ( AJAY TEWARI ) ashish JUDGE