Civil Revision No.6195 of 2008 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6195 of 2008 Date of decision: 23.04.2009. Surinder Singh etc. Petitioners Versus Suratpal Singh etc. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. S.S.Chandi,Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate and Mr. Yogesh Goyal, Advocate for the respondents ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the defendants-petitioners, states that he would require two adjournments to conclude their evidence. Likewise, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff-respondent informs that he would also require two adjournments to conclude his evidence. The petition shall stand disposed of accordingly with a direction to the learned Trial Court to dispose of the trial itself by or on 31.8.2009. Both the parties shall be granted two adjournments each (for the purpose of adducing evidence). If any party is inclined to summon any official witness, it shall be entitled to take dasti summons but the non return or non effecting of service thereof Civil Revision No.6195 of 2008 -2- **** would not entitle that party to ask for any further adjournment. The acknowledgment (of a copy of this order) issued by the concerned Judicial Officer shall be forwarded to the Registry of this Court. Learned Sessions Judge shall himself maintain a tab to ensure that the case is disposed of by afore-mentioned date. April 23, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge