IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 33598 of 1997 Between: 1 The Manging Director., A.P.Dairy Development Cooperative. Federation Limited., Lalapet, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Director, A.P.Dairy Development Coop. Federation Ltd., Karimnagar. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 K.Laxminarayana (Dismissed) Post: Chennaraopet, Tq: Narasampet, Warangal Dist.,. Dismissed for default as per court order 7/9/2000 as against R1 2 The Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Rep. Presiding Officer, Warangal. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and quash the Award dated 24/07/1997 passed in I.D.No. 135/1994 on the file of the Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Warangal, of the 2nd respondent herein and which was published in AP Gazette as GORt No. 2403, dated 14-08- 1997, and pass such other further order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.M.DILIP RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.33598 of 1997 ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the Andhra Pradesh Dairy Development Cooperative Federation Limited, aggrieved by the award of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Warangal, in I.D.No.135 of 1994, dated 24.07.1997. The first respondent herein is the workman, who invoked the jurisdiction of the Industrial Tribunal, Warangal, by way of an application under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The second respondent, the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Warangal, is a proforma party. Since the writ petition has been dismissed for default against the first respondent, by order dated 07.09.2000, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed against the second respondent also. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ (Ramesh Ranganathan, J) 18th February 2008. sh To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SUNITHA}