IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.600 of 2008 RAJU BAITHA Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,BIHAR,PATNA 3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, SARAN AT CHAPRA 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SARAN AT CHAPRA 5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MORHOWRAH 6. THE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF POLICE STATION, ISUAPUR, SARAN 7. PUNA SINGH 8. KANTI KUER 9. NAGESHWAR MAHTO ----------- 6 29.9.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of private respondents. The informant of Isuapur P.S. Case No.81 of 2007 registered under sections 302, 201/34 of the Penal Code is the petitioner in this case. He seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to conduct the investigation of the case in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he specifically mentioned in the F.I.R., that one Puna Singh had come to his house and took his mother out on the pretext of having wheat. However, his mother did not return. On information of Islam Mian, he found the dead body of his mother Parvati Devi lying in the nearby bush and bamboo clumbs. He fully believed that Puna Singh, Nageshwar Mahto and mother of Puna Singh had committed the murder of his mother. He further submits that other witnesses whose statement has been recorded vide paragraphs 5, 7, 7, 9, 10, 11 and 28 of the case diary have supported the prosecution case. However, the - 2 - KHAN Investigating Officer and the Supervising Officer have started investigation in the wrong direction and in order to save the accused persons, are implicating the innocent persons like Bhagwan Baitha, Subodh Baitha and Rameshwar Baitha. Learned counsel for the State submits that the police are properly conducting the investigation of the case. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, it would be open to the petitioner to file a representation to the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Saran at Chapra if investigation is still pending in respect of Isuapur P.S. Case No.81 of 2007, stating therein that the persons who are not accused are being implicated in this case. It would also be open to the petitioner to file protest petition before the learned Magistrate in case he has apprehension that the accused persons are being let off. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J)