IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10523 of 2009 RAM PRAVESH MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 08/04/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This Court is not persuaded to re-consider the prayer for anticipatory bail merely for the reason that another co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail when this Court has given reasons for rejection. The order on which the reliance is sought to be placed contains no reasons for grant of anticipatory bail. The fact, nonetheless, remains that co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. While rejecting this application this Court observes that any application for regular bail shall be considered by the court below on its own merits including the fact that co- accused has, in fact, been granted anticipatory bail by this court. KC (Navin Sinha, J.)