IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM M-20538 of 2009 Date of Decision: 10.03.2010 Bimla Kaur and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. H.S. Gill, Sr. Advocate with Mr. K.B.S. Mann, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G., Punjab for the respondent-State. Mr. S.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the complainant. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the compromise has been effected between the parties. As such, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 10.03.2010 JUDGE gurpreet