IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6790 of 2008 Maya Kumari, wife of Jai Prakash Singh Yadav, resident of Baraon, P.S. Chand, District- Kaimur (Bhabua). ………….. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2.The Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.Director, Panchayati Raj, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4.District Magistrate, Kaimur (Bhabua) 5.District Superintendent of Education, Kaimur at Bhabua 6.Block Education Extension Officer, Chand (Kaimur), Bhabua 7.Panchayat Sewak, Kuddi Panchayat cum Secretary, Gram Panchayat Kuddi, District- Kaimur(Bhabua) 8.Mukhiya Kuddi Gram Panchayat Chand Block, District- Kaimur, Bhabua 9.Puja Kumari, wife of Pradip Kumar, resident of village Duguthuan, P.S. Chand, District- Kaimur, Bhabua. ………….. Respondents ----------- 3. 28/07/2011 Grievance of the petitioner is that though, after the matter was remitted back from this Court, the Collector has passed orders on 30.11.2007 in her favour, but the same is not being complied with by the Mukhiya and the Panchayat Secretary. A copy of the order of the Collector is contained in Annexure-3. From the said order of the Collector, it appears that the appointment of private respondent has been found illegal as the petitioner was senior in age to her. Hence, he has found that the percentage of marks being the same, petitioner ought to 2 have been appointed. If the Collector has passed orders and issued directions to the Mukhiya and the Panchayat Secretary, it was he, who has to see that the same is complied with. In the circumstances, this writ is disposed of with a direction to the Collector, Kaimur to consider whether the order passed by his predecessor, as contained in Memo dated 30.11.2007 (copy whereof is Annexure-3 with the writ application) is in operation or not. If he finds that the order is still in operation, he should see to it that the same is complied with by the concerned authorities as early as possible. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)