IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID FRIDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2011 / 28TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 18270 of 2011(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- JOHNSON.K, S/O.K.KOSHY,AGED 50 YEARS, THATTARU THUNDIL JYOTHIS ,PUTHOOR PO, PUTHOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA,KOLLAM DISTRICT 691 507. BY ADV. MR.ALEXANDER GEORGE RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION, TRIVANDRUM,REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY EXCISE COMMISSIONER , KOLLAM. 4. THE EXCISE INSPECTOR,KOTTARAKKARA EXCISE RANGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 5. NEDUVATHUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH,REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,NEDUVATHUR,KOTTARAKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. ADV. MR.C.S.AJITH PRAKASH FOR R1 GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.G.GOPAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 18270 of 2011(G) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN, KERALA LEGISLATIVE PETITION COMMITTEE ON 5.7.2010. EXT.P2: COMPLAINT FILED BY ST.KURIAKOSE JACOBITE SYRIAN CHURCH BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN, KERALA LEGISLATIVE PETITION COMMITTEE ON 16.10.2010. EXT.P3: REPORT RECEIVED FROM THE KERALA LEGISLATIVE SECRETARIATE DTD. 8.3.2011. EXT.P4: DECISION SENT BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KOLLAM DTD. 9.2.2011. EXT.P5: PETITION FILED BY THE ACTION COMMITTEE BEFORE R2. EXT.P6: DECISION TAKEN BY R5 PUBLISHED IN THE DAILY NEWSPAPER. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL ...... // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No.18270 Of 2011 ---------------------- Dated this the 19th day of August, 2011. J U D G M E N T The writ petition is filed seeking a direction commanding respondents 2 to 4 not to permit the 1st respondent to restart the liquor shop Licence No.FL-6/07-08 at shop No.297, Puthoor Town, Mandapam junction and for other incidental reliefs. 2. The learned standing counsel for the 1st respondent Corporation on instructions submits that there is no proposal to re-start the shop at the same place. In view of the submission of the learned standing counsel, no further orders are necessary in the writ petition and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-