IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16165 of 2008 SUNIL KUMAR JAISWAL @ SUNIL JAISWAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 1.7.2008. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 302, 307,324 /34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant is the landlord of the deceased Manjit @ Aman Singh. It is alleged that this petitioner alongwith one other came in the evening to visit Manjit and thereafter remained in his house in the night. The informant heard sound of firing and the sound of Motor Cycle, thereafter the informant entered into the room of Aman Singh and saw Aman Singh and his wife were dead. Learned counsel refers to the submission of the brother at paragraphs no. 25, 26 and 51 and states that the brother has disclosed that Manjit had ran away with his wife who also died during the fateful night and that Manjit was a man with a criminal antecedent and wanted in several cases, and as such, learned counsel submits that the deceased Manjit had several enemies and any one of them could have killed his brother. However, there is strong circumstantial evidence against this petitioner and he has only remained in custody since 3.1.2008. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant bail - 2 - to the petitioner at this stage. The bail petition of the petitioner is rejected. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)