IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 28128 of 2007 Between: V. Gopi, S/o. V. Laxman, Now R/o. 5-2-220, Sastrinagar, Opp: Rikshaw Colony, Adilabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Assistant Engineer, (BSNL), Sripur Kagaznagar, Adilabad District. 2 The General Manager, Telecom District, Adilabad. 3 The Chief General Manager, Telecom, A.P. Circle, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order ordirection more in the nature of mandamus declaring that the petitioner is entitled for regegement as casual Mazdoor under the control of the respondents in view of his past expericence by holding the action of the respondents in not reengaging him as casual mazdoor inspite ofavailability of work is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violatrive of Articles 14,16, and 21 of theconstitutions and pass such other order o ordes as this Hon;ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.(SC FOR B.S.N.L) The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.28128 of 2007 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not re-engaging the petitioner as casual labour as arbitrary and illegal. This Court, while admitting the writ petition on 28.12.2007, passed interim order that if there is any work available for engaging casual labour, the claim of the petitioner shall be considered taking his past service into account. Now the learned counsel for petitioner states that the writ petition may be disposed of by making the order dated 28.12.2007 absolute. The learned counsel for respondents also expressed no objection for making the interim order as final order. In view of the same, the order passed by this Court on 28.12.2007 be treated as ﬁnal order in the writ petition and the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 14.10.2008 DA THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.28128 of 2007 14.10.2008