IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 18242 of 2010 Date of Decision: October 31, 2011 Suraj Mal ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others. ..Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER. Present:-Mr. R.N. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG Haryana. MAHESH GROVER, J (Oral). The instant petition in which the petitioner prayed for retention in service beyond 58 years of age on account of his being physically challenged person has been considered and granted by the respondent vide order dated 14th September, 2011, which has been placed on record as mark-A. In view of the aforesaid reason the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and disposed of as such. October 31, 2011 (MAHESH GROVER) aarti JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 18242 of 2010 Date of Decision: October 31, 2011 Suraj Mal ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others. ..Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER. Present:-Mr. R.N. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG Haryana. MAHESH GROVER, J (Oral). The instant petition in which the petitioner prayed for retention in service beyond 58 years of age on account of his being physically challenged person has been considered and granted by the respondent as is clear from the letter dated 14th September, 2011, which has been placed on record by the State counsel. Same is taken on record as mark-A. In view of the aforesaid, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. October 31, 2011 (MAHESH GROVER) aarti JUDGE