Ash - 1 - cra-233.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 233 OF 2010 Avinash S. Rangnekar. .. Applicant. Vs Shri Subrav L. Shanbag (since deceased ) 1-A Miss Nayana Bubrao Shanbag & Ors. .. Respondents -- Shri D.M. Shah for the Applicant. Shri V.K. Damble for Respondent No.1B. -- CORAM : A.S. OKA, J DATED : 22ND DECEMBER, 2010 P.C. . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicant and the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1B. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the Applicant on instructions states that the Applicant is not pressing the revision application on merits but prays that a longer time to vacate the suit premises be granted. The said prayer is opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1B. Ash - 2 - cra-233.10.sxw 3. The Applicant has made a statement that he is not pressing the Revision Application on merits and hence the decree for possession will attain finality. Moreover, the Applicant will have to give undertaking if he wants time to vacate the suit premises. Considering the facts of the case, time deserves to be granted till the end of June, 2012. Hence, I pass the following order : - ORDER (i) The Revision Application is dismissed as not pressed. (ii) Notwithstanding the dismissal of the Revision Application, the decree for possession shall not be executed till 30th June, 2012 subject to the Applicant and all adult members of his family filing usual undertakings in this Court within a period of six weeks from today. (iii) If the undertakings are not filed within a period of six weeks from today, the decree for possession shall forthwith become executable. JUDGE