CRLR No.122/02 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. (Modification/Recall Appln. No.925/10) Mr. RP Nautiyal, Adv. for the revisionist. Mr. Nandan Arya, AGA for the State/ respondent no.1. Mr. Pawan Mishra, Adv. for the applicant/ respondent no.2. By way of this application, the applicant has prayed to modify/recall the judgment and order dated 19.7.2010 passed by the Court. Vide order dated 19.7.10, this Court in view of the joint agreement between both the parties, disposed of the revision with the observation that the revisionist shall pay Rs.800/- per month to respondent no.2-Smt. Kaushalya from the date of application i.e. 6.2.2001. The applicant, by way of present application, seeks to modify/recall the above-said order. Section 362 Cr.P.C. defines that, no Court, when it has signed its judgment or final order disposing of a case, shall alter or review the same except to correct clerical or arithmetical error. However, by way of the present application, the applicant seeks to modify/recall the order which has been passed on merits, which as per Section 362 Cr.P.C. is not permissible, inasmuch as by doing, it would amount to review of the judgment which is not permissible as per law. Hence the application for modification/recall is rejected accordingly. (D.V., J.) 29.10.2010 Rajeev Dang