IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4969 of 2008 ====================================================== Bhim Singh, son of Shri Satrudhan Singh, resident of village Kunda, Police Station Aurangabad (Mufassil), district Aurangabad .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Director, Panchayat Raj, Bihar, Patna 3. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad 4. The Block Development Officer, Dev, Aurangabad 5. Krishna Ram, Mukhiya, Hasouli Gram Panchayat, Aurangabad .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Prasad I Mr. Lal Bahadur Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. (SC6) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SHEEMA ALI KHAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SHEEMA ALI KHAN) 3 27-09-2011 This writ application has been filed for a direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to enquire into the illegal acts of the Mukhiya of Hasouli Gram Panchayat Krishna Ram, respondent no. 5. It is alleged that he has undertaken constructions works, especially with respect to the repair of the road between Nethwa-Hudrahi Aahar via Nayka Aahar up to Kapasia Canal vide Scheme No. 5 of 2006-07. The allegation is that the respondent-Mukhiya is not acting in accordance with the provisions of the contract. It is said in this writ application that a complaint has been made Patna High Court CWJC No.4969 of 2008 (3) dt.27-09-2011 2 / 2 2 against the Mukhiya to the District Magistrate, Aurangabad. The petitioner has not described himself in this writ application as to how and in what manner he has an interest in the said project. For all, the petitioner may be one of the persons who had also applied for the contract and having not get it, has filed this writ application or he may be a genuine person who is aggrieved by the misuse of the funds utilized for repair works taken up by the Mukhiya concerned. In any event, any citizen who finds that the Government Contract work are not done in accordance with law, would have the remedy to file his grievances before the Road Construction Department or whoever is responsible for awarding such contract. If any such an application is filed, after taking into consideration the bonafides of the petitioner, the concerned authorities may take appropriate action in the matter. This writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Prabhakar Anand/- (Sheema Ali Khan, J)