IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1186 of 2008 JAMUNA SAO Versus MUKESH KUMAR & ORS ----------- 2 16.9.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, in the context of relief that was sought in the plaint, the impleadment of the petitioner was not at all necessary. That being so, if the Court below has not allowed the impleadment, such order cannot be said to be vitiated on account of any jurisdictional error. Accordingly, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. The apprehension of the petitioner that anything held in the suit will also cloud his right with regard to the title as claimed by him, is wholly misconceived. If the petitioner so chooses, he can also get declaration of his right and title by filing his own independent suit. With the aforementioned observations, this civil revision application is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)