IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.600 of 2011 JYOTI PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04/ 17.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and the name of this petitioner came in the confessional statement of co- accused and subsequently, when the house of the petitioner was searched, one mobile set and ten live cartridges were recovered and for the above stated recovery, a separate case was instituted. Further contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that even the confessional statement of co-accused assumed to be true, then also, co-accused has stated only to this extent that he as well as other accused had assembled in the house of the petitioner for making preparation of the aforesaid dacoity. It is further contended by him that so far as recovery of mobile set is concerned, the same is not looted property. So far as criminal antecedent of the petitioner is concerned, earlier only three cases had been registered against the petitioner and in all the aforesaid cases, petitioner has already been granted privilege of bail. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Jyoti Paswan, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Gaya (Rail) P.S. Case no. 90/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)