IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 26783 of 2001 Between: G.L.N.Swamy, S/o. Chinna Venkata Swamy Vidyanagar, Near Saichaitanaya School, ELURU West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Eluru , West Godvari District. 2 The Secretary, Ponangi LSCS Ltd., Ponangi Village, Eluru Mandal, West Godvari District. 3 V. Venkateswara Rao, Circle Supervisor, Dostrict Cooperative Central Bank Ltd., Eluru, the then Supervisor, Ponangi LSCS Ltd., West Godvari District. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.A.KUMAR FOR MR D.V.BHADRAM Counsel for the Respondents : ---- The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is, therefore, prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or orders or direction more particularly in the natureof writ of certiorari by calling for the records, declaring the surcharge orders Rc.No.1085/96-B dated 31-08-1997 of the first respondent herein i.e., Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Eluru, West Godavari District, as confirmed by the orders dated 18-04-2001 of the Honourable A.P.Cooperative Tribunal at Vijayawada in O.A.No.22 of 1998 as without jurisdiction, power or authority, illegal, arbitrary, unjust, violative of provisions of Section 60(1) of A.P.Cooperative Societies Act 7 of 1964, contrary to the cardinal principles of natural justice as also violative of the ratio laid down in various judgments of this Honourable Court on this subject and hence quash them.” At the hearing, Sri T.A.Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri D.V.Bhadram, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner paid the amounts in excess of his liability and that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to him to approach the respondents to seek refund of the excess amounts allegedly paid by him. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the main petition as withdrawn, WPMP No.19934 of 2008 is disposed of. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 18th July, 2008 vrn