1 RPWst31484.10 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 31484 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6621 OF 2010 Mr.Raghubir Prasad Mathur & anr. ... Petitioners v/s Mr.H.L.Dama ... Respondent Mr.D.D.Sngh for the petitioners. Mr.P.S.Dani for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHTA MHATRE, J. DATED: 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2011 (In Chamber) P.C.: 1. The review petition has been preferred against my order dated 4.10.2010. The learned advocate for the petitioners has relied on the judgment of this Court in the case of Chandrakant Dhanu & anr. v/s Sharmila Kapur & ors., reported in 2009 (2) Mh.L.J. 243, in support of the submission that the factors which were required to be considered by me have not been considered while passing the order under review. He has also submitted that besides 2 RPWst31484.10 the leave and licence agreement, there is no material on record to indicate why the petitioners are directed to pay any amount to the respondent. 2. In my opinion, no good grounds for review have been made out by the petitioners. No new material which was not considered or available when the order under review was passed has been placed on record. Review petition dismissed. (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) 3 RPWst31484.10