IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.691 of 2008 MACCHU MAHTO @ MACHHU MAHTO S/O LATE PARMESHWAR MAHTO --- PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. MUNNI DEVI W/O MACCHU MAHTO --- OPP. PARTIES. ----------- 03 15.09.2010 Both sides present. Learned counsel for the petitioner while pressing this application made two fold submissions. It is stated that he is willing to take the estranged wife back to the matrimonial home. It is next contended that he is a labour and would be unable to pay the amount. This Court finds from the impugned order that a sum of Rs. 1500/- (One thousand five hundred) has been directed to be paid to the applicant per month from the date of the order, who has a minor son to support. The quantum of maintenance amount seems to be reasonable. It has also been evident from the materials on record including the document brought on record by the husband/petitioner that he was earning handsome amount at Dubai. So far as the first submission is concerned, the parties are always at liberty to move the Court below for appropriate relief if both of them are willing to live together. So far as the second submission is concerned, this Court finds that the findings are adverse to the petitioner which are founded on evidence on record. There is no merit in this application. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)