IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 7287 of 2008 Decided on: 06.09.2010 Dinesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner. : Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner was appointed on compassionate basis as a Beldar after the death of his father on 22.10.1994. Though, the petitioner was appointed as daily wage Beldar Class-IV, however the similarly situate persons, namely, Shri Sunil Kumar and Smt. Neeru Bala were appointed as Class-III employees. 2. Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate has relied upon two judgments rendered by this Court in Archana Kumari versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, LPA No. 63 of 2008, decided on 17.03.2010 and Jitender Kumar versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, CWP(T) No. 7240 of 2008, decided on 21.07.2010. 3. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- to the respondent-State to consider the case of the petitioner in view of the law/principles laid down by this Court in the above cited judgments with all consequential benefits, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment. While considering the case of the petitioner, the respondent-State shall also take into consideration Clause-10(B) of the Kith and Kin policy. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge September 6, 2010 (K. Attri)