:1: 23 to 26.wp.5347.11 ata IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5347 OF 2011 Miss Sharda Amarsing Shirke .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.5348 OF 2011 Miss Sangita Dnyaneshwar Warghade .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.5349 OF 2011 Mr. Sidhanath Baburao Pawar .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.5350 OF 2011 Mr.Dilip Laxmanrao Bhikule .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.5346 OF 2011 Mrs. Varsha Vivek Joshi .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar for the petitioners. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. :2: 23 to 26.wp.5347.11 CORAM :- A. M. KHANWILKAR & R. Y. GANOO, JJ DATE :- JULY 29, 2011 P.C. Heard Counsel for the parties. Rule. Mr. Sonawane waives notice for the contesting Respondents. By consent, matters are heard forthwith. 2 Mr. Sonawane, Counsel appearing for the Respondents 1,2 & 3, in all fairness submits that factual position stated in the Petition that each of the Petitioner is graduate in degree in Librarian Science is correct. In the case of such candidates issue regarding grant of revised pay scale in accordance with the Rules of 1998 with consequential benefits if any, has already been answered by the bench of this Court to which one of us was party in Writ Petition No.177 of 2011 with connected cases vide Judgment dated 28th April, 2011. Following the said decision, we have no hesitation in allowing all these Petitions on the same terms. 3 Hence Rule is made absolute in these Petitions on the same terms as provided to in the aforesaid decision. ( R. Y. GANOO, J ) ( A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)