CWP No. 19444 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 19444 of 2010 Date of decision 29 .10.2010 Joginder Nath and another ... Petitioners Versus Union of India and others ... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. Dilbagh Singh,Advocate for the petitioners 1.To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 2.Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? M.M.KUMAR, J. The only issue raised in this petition while challenging order dated 18.5.2010 (P.13) and order dated 28.5.2010 (P.15) is whether the petitioners are entitled to higher pay scale. According to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh, the order dated 20.7.2009 (P.10) has rightly held that the petitioners are not qualified to claim higher pay scale because they do not answer the requirements laid down in the provisions. According to the provision, the minimum qualification required for the post is Matric or Higher Secondary passed with ITI certificate in the respective trade. The order dated 20.7.2009 (P.10) further states that after scrutiny of the documents submitted by the petitioner it was found that he did not pass even Middle Standard Examination and as ITI course in the trade of Plumber. The ITI certificate required was in the trade of Fitter. Therefore, he did not possess the ITI qualification in the later trade nor he fulfill the other qualification of passing matriculation. CWP No. 19444 of 2010 2 We have heard the learned counsel at a considerable length and do not find any ground to interfere in the view taken by the Tribunal. The petition is without without merit. Dismissed. (M.M.Kumar) Judge ( Ritu Bahri ) 29.10.2010 Judge okg