IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19449 of 2011 Jitendra Singh & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 30.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the agnates of the informant are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged against the petitioners that they were seen by the informant soon before the occurrence in the field talking with the accused. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that there was some partition dispute between the parties which has been admitted by the witness during investigation but the F.I.R. and impugned order do not reflect as such. Moreover, only circumstantial accusation has been alleged by the first informant. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, Jitendra Singh, Ramayan Singh and Satish Kumar Singh, be released on 2 bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Kargahar P.S. Case No. 43 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Rohtas at Sasaram, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)