H!GH COURT OF CHHAniSGARHAT BjLASPUR W. P.QNo. 6450 of 2006 PetiBoner Ramkhilawan Kev/at, S/o Latet Ram Kewat, aged 28 year, R/o Village Baitary Post — Ma'har, Tahsil - Masturi, Ustt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus- Respondents 1. Gram Panchayat, Village-Jaitpur, Post- Malhar, Tahsil Mlasturi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Smt. Sanlosh Kumari Pandey, Sarpanch, Grampanchayat Jaitpur, Post- Malhar, Tahsil Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Chief Executi'/e OfRcer, Matsay Krishak Vikash Abhikaran, Bilaspur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through Coliector, Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. 3. 4. WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri J. P. Sarkar, Advocate forthe petitioner. None for the respondents No. 1 to 3. Shri S. K. Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.4. Thakur ORDER (Passed on this ^" day of October. 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the second agresment between the Gram Panchayat and the petitioner is iliegal vnfriout steting the facte asto why the same agresment is iitegal. More over the petitioner has also not made any prayer to the effect that the second agreement is iltegal. 2. In visw of the fact that the petition is vague and there is no specific prayer, it is dismissed accordingly. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge