Civil Revision No. 6221 of 2009 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6221 of 2009 Date of decision: 27.4.2010 Sohan Lal ...Petitioner Versus Narasi Bhagat Madaan and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Arun Singal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the respondents. S.D.ANAND, J. It is apparent, from a persual of the impugned order itself, that there is commonness of the parties in both the civil suits one of which had been filed by one party for specific performance; while the other had been filed by the petitioner herein for a permanent injunction against the defendants-respondents. The learned Trial Court directed the simultaneous disposal of both case by observing that “both the civil suits involve the adjudication of legality and validity of agreement to sell and has ordered to transfer the said case to this case just to avoid conflicting judgments.” The petitioner, who is in revision against it, does not appear to have anything to lose in the process of simultaneous disposal. His grievance that the disposal might get delayed as evidence is yet to be concluded in one of the cases can be taken Civil Revision No. 6221 of 2009 -2- **** care of by issuing a direction to the learned Trial Court to dispose of that particular suit within six months of the next date of hearing by granting two adjournments of equal duration to the parties herein. The acknowledgment (of a copy of this order) issued by the concerned Judicial Officer shall be forwarded to the Registry of this Court. Learned Sessions Judge shall himself maintain a tab to ensure that the case is disposed of by afore-mentioned date. Disposed of accordingly. April 27, 2010 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge