IN THE HIGH COURI' OF CHATTISGARH AT BILA {CHHATHSGARH) WRI;I’ PETITION S' N040é OF 2007 PETITION ER I vmdra Kumar Smha Son of rLate Shn Janardan Prasad Smha aged about 44 years, Working asl‘ Assistant Grade—II '(ASsist‘anty‘X Accountant), .Janpad Panchayat ,. Ambi’kapur, ' District (C.G.). Surguja VERSUS / . State of Chhattisgarh Through i v The Secretary, Department of ' - ‘ Panch‘ayat and Soc1al, Welfare D.,K.S.. Bhawan, Railpur (C.G.). RESPONDENTS The Collector, Ambik‘apur, District Surguja (C.G.). . The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchaya't Ambikapur, lDis;trict Surguja (C.G.). ll.‘ 4. “The Deputy DirectOr Panchayat H / and SOClal Welfare, Amblkapun l District SurgUJa (C G ) 5. ./ The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). Chief Executive Officer, Janpad' Panchayat Praa District Surguja (C,'G.. ' The W (v.K. vANDEY) ADVOCATE :r: H SPUR 1 d , " ii " l emngr ) WW wPH’Mg amm (W) Wmm SB: Hon. Mr. Jastice Pri 07.012Q0g: Shri V.K. Pandey counsel t‘or the petitioner, ispcndents 1,2 and 4‘ mdents 3,5 and 6. C‘naHenge in this petition 4.7.200? canceling the eariier tra Counsei for the petitioner was passed by this Couri on petitioner but intentionally the be been given to him. On the other hand, couns that as the petitioner was already was not entitled to derive any ber Counsel for the petitione oermittecl to withdraw this petitim 3een paid salary for about 10 mo 39 given. Counsel fer the responden' nakes a representation in resp @ mzoo 7 wwwwxwm mimam tinker Diwaker Shri Arvind Dubey PL for r£ Shri Arun Sao GA for respc is made to the order dated nsfer order of the petitioner. submits that status quo order 13.7.2007 in favour of the ne‘m of the said order has not el for the respondents submit relieved prior to 13.7.2007, he efit of the said order. rsubmits that he may be 1 but as the petitioner has‘not 1ths, same may be directedto l ts submit that if the petitioner ect of payment of salary, it WWWW—Ws/gs 11 /2008——1 ,oo,ooo. ’ . F...w..99..é..$.)...a.g..é.$......‘120° 7 wouid be decided by the authc rities concerned in accordance with iaw. Accgrdingly, the petition s dismissed as withdrawn with iiberty to make representation. if such a representation is made bV’the petitioner, the same is directed to be decided by the authorities concerned strictiy in accordance with law. it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merit of the case and the authorities concerned would be free to decide the representation in accordance with taw. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge WWWmW—Fs/9sr~u/zoos 1,00,000. ‘WW<W> www WMrYwm “ii: h