IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 12TH JANUARY 2009 / 22ND POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 1064 of 2009(B) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- D.VINOD, VARIYARATHARAYIL, MANAKUZHY P.O., MAVELIKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.SUDHADEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 1064 OF 2009 (B) ==================== Dated this the 12th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner made an application for a regular permit in respect of Stage Carriage KL16/B-877, on the route Malayalapuzha-Kayamkulam Private Bus stand. On its rejection, he filed appeal before the Tribunal as MVAA 287/08. That appeal was allowed as per Ext.P3 judgment, directing reconsideration of the application in the light of the judgment of this court mentioned therein. When the matter went back to the RTA, the RTA adjourned the proceedings as is seen from Ext.P2, with a suggestion that Ext.P3 should be appealed against. Final orders on the application made by the petitioner has not been passed by the RTA even as on date and therefore the writ petition is filed. 2. As is seen from Ext.P2, consideration of the application was deferred as early as on 25/11/2008 and so far final decision has not been taken. 3. Therefore, I direct the 1st respondent to pass final orders on the application referred to in Ext.P2 proceedings at any rate within 8 WPC 1064/09 :2 : weeks of receipt of a copy of this judgment. However, any implementation of Ext.P3 judgment by the RTA will be subject to the outcome of any proceedings that may be instituted against the said judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp