THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.25852 of 2011 Dated 15th September, 2011 Between: Mangilal Chowdhary …Petitioner And The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri S.Jagadish Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: Dr.Y.Padmavathi Counsel for respondent No.4: AGP for MA & UD The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in trying to demolish structures in house bearing No.2- 85/1 of Chandanagar, Serilingampally Circle No.12, GHMC, Hyderabad, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner constructed a building comprising cellar + three floors + pent house in the above-mentioned premises after obtaining permission from the erstwhile Serilingampally Municipality. As certain constructions in deviation of the sanctioned plan were made, the petitioner applied for regularisation. It is his plea that by proceedings, dated 30.06.2010, respondent No.2 has regularised the unauthorised constructions. The petitioner alleged that on 12.09.2011, the officials of the respondents have visited his premises and insisted on demolition of certain portions of the structures on the ground that they were constructed contrary to the sanctioned plan. The petitioner asserts that all the structures, which were raised in deviation of the sanctioned plan have been regularised and that even if the respondents find that any illegal structure is still in existence, they cannot take any action without following the procedure prescribed under the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’). At the hearing, Dr.Y.Padmavathi, learned Standing Counsel for the GHMC, on instructions, submitted that the officials of the Corporation have merely inspected the premises and on finding that certain illegal structures exist in the cellar portion meant for parking, they have requested the petitioner to remove the same. She has further stated that the officials of the Corporation will follow the procedure envisaged under Sections 452 and 636 of the Act for removing the unauthorised structures. This submission of the learned Standing Counsel is placed on record and the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.31872 of 2011 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 15th September, 2011 VGB