CRM- M 36294 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M 36294 of 2011 Date of decision : December 23, 2011 Virpal Kaur and another, ...... Petitioners v. State of Punjab, ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. A.S.Cheema, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sumeet Abrol, AAG Punjab *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioners seek grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.12, dated 23.3.2011, registered under Sections 304-B, 498-A, 34, 302 of the IPC, at Police Station Jaurkian, District Mansa. On 12.12.2011, the following contentions were noticed :- “ Learned counsel has argued that earlier the case had been registered under Section 304-B IPC and the present petitioners have been granted bail by this Court by order dated 01.10.2011 passed in CRM Nos.17351 of 2011 and 19087 of 2011. Now, against the co-accused (father-in-law) charge has been framed under Section 302 IPC and the petitioners also apprehend that against them also charge would be framed under Section 302 IPC and on that eventuality occurring the petitioners would be arrested.” Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from HC Gurjant CRM- M 36294 of 2011 ::2:: Singh, has accepted the fact that charge against the petitioners has also been framed under Section 302 of the IPC. In these circumstances, considering that the petitioners were granted the concession of anticipatory bail and the facts remain the same, I see no ground to deny the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Consequently, in the event of their arrest, the petitioners shall be released on anticipatory bail by the Investigating Officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) December 23, 2011. JUDGE `kk'