IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-14290-2011(O&M) Date of decision:21.07.2011. Ramphal ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Rahul Sharma-I, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. A.S.Rai, DAG, Punjab, for respondent No.1/State. Mr. Jaspreet Singh, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case registered vide FIR No.138 dated 20.04.2011, under Sections 307, 459, 427, 148, 149 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, Police Station Tripuri Town, Patiala. The case in nutshell is that the complainant, who is brother of the petitioner, had suffered two lacerated wounds on his right hand on account of a shot having been fired from a revolver. The petitioner is said to have been armed with iron rod. The interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner vide order dated 11.05.2011 which was further corrected by this Court on 19.05.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and since it was a dispute between the brothers, therefore, it has been now settled with the intervention of the family members. The learned State Counsel, on instructions from ASI Shiv Kirpal Singh, concedes both these facts and submits that the petitioner is no more required for further investigation as even the challan has been presented in the concerned Court. Looking into the role played by the petitioner in the occurrence and the injury suffered by the complainant, the orders dated 11.05.2011 & 19.05.2011 passed by this Court are hereby made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein. July 21, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE