1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO. 2701 OF 2009 Mr Sameer Dhadi @ Abdul Rashid Shah .. Applicant Vs State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. A.M.Saraogi, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs.S.D.Shinde, APP, for the Respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 30/06/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent. 2. Ms Shinde, learned APP, on instructions from PSI S.K. More, submits that so far the present applicant has not been arraigned as accused in the instant C.R. In view of her statement, the application for anticipatory bail, in my opinion, cannot be entertained. Hence, the application is disposed of. It is open to the applicant to approach the appropriate court for appropriate relief in the event the police register offence T 2 against him. It is needless to state that in the event the applicant’s name is arraigned as accused in the instant C.R and if he files an application for appropriate relief before appropriate court, such application will be considered on merits in accordance with law and without being influenced by the observations made in the order passed by the Sessions Court dated 17.6.2009 in Anticipatory Bail Application No.559 of 2009. With these observations, the application is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)