IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23268 of 2010 SUNDRA YADAV @ SUNDRA KUMAR & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Ekangarsarai P.S. Case No. 196 of 2009 registered under Sections 363, 365/34 of the I.P.C. Initially the case was registered under Section 363 of the I.P.C. When the petitioners surrendered and got bail from the court of the learned A.C.J.M., Hilsa, Nalanda. Now the charge sheet has been submitted under Section 365 of the I.P.C. also. Hence the petitioners have filed the present anticipatory bail application. In my view, since the petitioners surrendered and got the regular bail from the court of the learned A.C.J.M., Hilsa, Nalanda, the present anticipatory bail application is not maintainable. Hence, the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners is rejected. I see no reason for the learned court below in differing with earlier view while 2 considering the regular bail petition provided the petitioners have not misused the privilege of regular bail granted by the learned A.C.J.M., Hilsa, Nalanda. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)