SCA/3445/1988 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3445 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.GARG ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= SOLANKI J GANAPATHBHAI & 9 - Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJ & 2 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR DILIP B RANA for Petitioners MR IM PANDYA, ASSTT.GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondents ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.GARG Date : 18/07/2007 ORAL JUDGMENT Shri Dilip B. Rana, learned counsel for the petitioners; Shri I.M. Pandya, learned AGP for the respondents. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are seeking SCA/3445/1988 2/2 JUDGMENT reliefs in relation to their reinstatement, regularization of services, salary on principle of equal salary for equal work and such other reliefs. In the opinion of this Court, the High Court would not be appropriate Forum for claiming such reliefs. In the present matter, number of factual disputes have been raised, such disputes can be decided only after recording evidence and on strength of findings based on the facts. I refuse to interfere in the matter at this stage but however, would give liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate Forum in appropriate proceedings for appropriate relief. The question of delay, if any, may be explained by the petitioners by submitting that since 1988 till date, the matter remained pending consideration before this Court. The petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged accordingly. No costs. Interim relief, if any, is vacated. [R.S. GARG, J.] pirzada/-