CRM-M No. 6155 of 2011(O&M) **** S.Himmat Singh and another vs. Ved Parkash and another Present: Mr.R.S.Rai, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Karan Pathak, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.P.S. Paul, DAG, Punjab. **** Learned counsel has argued that a dispute between tenant and landlord has been converted into a complaint under Sections 379, 452, 427, 506 and 120-B IPC and that Sections 3(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes(Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been invoked only so as to pressurise the petitioner. None has appeared even today on behalf of the complainant to oppose this petition. In the circumstances I deem it appropriate to direct the trial Court to grant bail to the petitioner to his satisfaction, in the event of his appearance. Ordered accordingly. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE March 31, 2011 sunita