IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 306 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 306 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 306 OF 2009 Sanjay Dashrath Patil & Ors. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Shrikant V. Gavand for the Applicants. Mr.Rajesh More, APP for the State. Mr.C.G. Gavnekar for the Original Complainant. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 2, 2009 DATED : FEBRUARY 2, 2009 DATED : FEBRUARY 2, 2009 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard Counsel for the applicant and APP for the State. 2. This is an application for anticipatory bail. 3. It is alleged that the applicant who belonged to the group of a candidate who lost election, went to the house of the complainant and assaulted him and other members of his family. 4. I have perused the material on record and the FIR. In my view, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. - 2 - 5. The Counsel for the applicant submits that no role has been attributed to the present applicant and the FIR only mentions the names of 22 persons who were present when the offence was committed. 6. In my view, it is not necessary to give the specific role of the persons particularly, they barged into the house of the complainant and all of them assaulted the complainant and the members of his family. In my view, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. The applicant may apply for regular bail. 7. The application is rejected. 8. If an application for regular bail is filed, the trial court shall not be influenced by any observation made by this court while dismissing the application for anticipatory bail. (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)