1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3178 OF 2004 Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union Petitioners vs. Security Guards Board for Gr.Bombay Respondents & Thane Dist. & ors. Ms.Sonali Humane i/b.Mr.S.S.Pakale for the petitioners. Ms.Lata S. Desai for respondent no.1. Mr.S.K.Talsania i/b.M/s.Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for respondent no.2. Mr.A.B.Desai i/b.Mr.Avinash K. Jalisatgi for respondent no.3. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED : 20th November, 2006 P.C. It is the contention of respondent no.2 that he had a construction site where Security Guards were appointed. The contract was terminated even before the petition was filed. . On behalf of respondent no.1, the learned counsel points out that the Security Guards have not even approached the respondent no.1. 2. In these circumstances, in our opinion, this will not be a fit case to exercise our extraordinary 2 jurisdiction. Petition dismissed. No costs. ( F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) ( ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. ) ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. ) ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. )