WP(C) 2506/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA. Heard Mr. S. Kataki, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms R. Chakrab orty, learned Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 4.1.2011 (Annexure-B to the writ petition), by which he was placed under suspension as per the provisions of the Assam Services (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1964. According to Mr. Kataki, learn ed counsel for the petitioner, the ground on which the petitioner has been place d under suspension is non-existent and thus, on the review of the said order, th e petitioner is required to be reinstated in service. Ms R. Chakraborty, learned State counsel, on the other hand, submits that since the petitioner has been placed under suspension pending drawal of departmental p roceeding, there is no question of revoking the order of suspension. She further submits that since the representation made by the petitioner for review of the order of suspension is still pending, the writ Court will be reluctant to sit on appeal over the sound discretion exercised by the authority. Considering the matter in its entirety and as agreed to by the learned c ounsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of directing the Commissi oner & Secretary to the Government of Assam in the Education (S) Department to t ake on record the Annexure-E representation dated 6.1.2011 submitted by the peti tioner and dispose of the same in accordance with law. No opinion is expressed regarding merit of the case of the petitioner. The matter is left open to the so und discretion of the said Commissioner & Secretary. Let the representation be d isposed of as expeditiously as possible, preferably within 30th June,2011.