BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Third day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16964 of 2011 1 RAJAGOPAL 2 N.R. SANTHI 3 SIVARAMAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SINDHUPATTI POLICE STATION., MADURAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.148/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. J.GUNASHEELANMUTHIAH Advocate For Respondent : Mr.R.RAMACHANDRAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 420 & 506(i) IPC in Crime No.148 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the first petitioner is the father of the defacto complainant and the second petitioner is the sister of the defacto complainant and the third petitioner is the husband of second petitioner . The learned cousnel for the petitioners would further submit the allegation against the petitioners is that the second petitioner, by impersonating herself as defacto complainant, executed a power deed infavour of the first petitioner and in turn, the first petitioner executed a sale deed in favour of third petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that the petitioners are innocent and that they have been falsely implicated in this case. 3.The learned Government Advocate would submit that the petitioners have forged the documents and got the property owned by the defacto complainant in their favour impersonation and that the investigation is pending. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.Considering the relationships between the parties and also considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumanglam, on each executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Magistrate concerned or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required. sd/- 23/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUMANGALAM 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SINDHUPATTI POLICE STATION., MADURAI DISTRICT, +1. CC to M/S. J.GUNASHEELANMUTHIAH Advocate SR.No.45685 rl/6c – 6.1.2012 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16964 of 2011 Date :23/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/