IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-2788 of 2009 Date of decision : 24.04.2009 Harinder Singh and others ....Petitioners V/s State of Punjab and another ....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate for Mr. J.B.S. Gill, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG Punjab for respondent No. 1-State. Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 2. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Notice of motion was issued in this case as the counsel for the petitioners has submitted that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties. Counsel has thus, relied upon the said compromise Annexure P-3 in support of his prayer for quashing of the FIR in question. Learned counsel for the State on instructions from Head Constable Gurnek Singh, who is present in Court, has pointed out that there are two injured in this case namely Mohan Lal and Kewal Krishan both of whom received grievous injuries. Learned counsel has also pointed out that the injured Kewal krishan is present in Court today. He has received a injury on his neck which was declared dangerous to life. Section 307 IPC was included in the FIR because of the said injury. Counsel has further stated that in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in Manoj Sharma Vs. State, 2008 Vol. 4, RCR(Crl.), 827, offence under Section 307 cannot be Crl. Misc No. M-2788 of 2009 -2- quashed on the basis of compromise. This apart, counsel has pointed out that injured Kewal krishan who is present in Court, has totally denied that any compromise has been arrived at between the parties. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition for quashing is devoid of any merit and is dismissed as such. 24.04.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE