IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.806 of 2007 BACHA PRASAD MISHRA, SON OF LATE VISHWA NATH MISHRA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – KHORIPAKAR, P.O. PALTU HATA, VIYA – JAMO BAZAR, P.S. JAMO BAZAR, DISTRICT – SIWAN. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY FINANCE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A&E), BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY CUM- SECONDARY EDUCATION , GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE COLLECTOR CUM- DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SIWAN. 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SIWAN. 6. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, SIWAN. ----------- 7. 10.08.2009 A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent – State stating therein that the admitted retiral dues has been sanctioned as contained in the office order vide Annexure-F to the writ application. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment towards Suspense Account, has still remained to be paid. Learned counsel for the State submits that in case, petitioner files a representation, the same shall be considered as per law without delay. 2 In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 5, enclosing the relevant documents, if any, in support of his claim alongwith the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today. In case such representation is filed, respondent no. 5 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievance of the petitioner could be settled without further delay. Accordingly, the writ application stand disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)