IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.20172 of 2011 Date of Decision.01.11.2011 Doaba Siri Guru Singh Sabha .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Gursimran Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The writ petition is for a direction to the respondent Nos.1 and 2, who are the police functionaries to take control of a situation at Gurdwara which, according to the petitioner, is explosive. In respect of the management of same Gurdwara, which is subject of the writ petition, there is already a suit pending and Receiver has also been appointed as per the averments in the writ petition. Any direction relating to the administration must be only before the same court where the case is pending. It cannot be duplicated by writ process. 2. The writ petition is dismissed. The petitioner will be at liberty to approach the Civil Court for any appropriate direction. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 01, 2011 Pankaj*