1 ABA-265.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.265 OF 2011 {For Anticipatory Bail} Munawar Harun Qureshi & Ors. .... Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent S/Shri Subhash Jha i/b Subhash Hulyalkar for the Applicants. Ms G.P. Mulekar, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: APRIL 19, 2011 P.C: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicants and the learned APP. The purpose for which the applicants' being in custody was stated to be necessary was for recovery of cheque. The recovery of the cheque has already been effected. Therefore, there is no warrant to deny bail to the applicants. In view of this, the order dated 5-4-2011 is hereby confirmed. 2. This order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation 2 ABA-265.11 that if charge-sheeted, the applicants may furnish fresh bond before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, dated 2-12-2010, delivered in Criminal Appeal No.2271 of 2010, arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 7615 of 2009 {Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.}. 3. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)