@ 6/ c?‘ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A. No. (W C) OF 2005 ' sing'e genm Miscellaneous Appeal Under/section‘i73 Motor Vehicle Act 1988 APPELLANT Mithun Dhidhi,Aged about 16 yrs‘ 'd‘LAIMENT R/o —Tatiband Basti, P.S. —Amanaka t Raipur,Tahsil & District — Raipur (C.G.), E On behalf of the (appellant) minor child 1 t Kalyan Dhidhi, aged about 33 yrs. S/o — Bondar Dhidhi, R/o — Tatibandh Bas1 PS. — Amanaka, Distt.— Raipur (C.G.) u. VERSUS RESPONDENTS / NON-APPLICANT gt) Narayan Verma, aged about 55 Year S/o. Shobhit Ram Verma, R/o Village & Post : Mohra, P.Sl Suhela Tah. Baloda Bazar, Distt— Raipur (C.G.) Gulab Ram Verma S/o. N.P. Verma R/o Village & Post : Mohra, P.S. Suhela Tah. Baloda Bazar, Distt— Raipur (C.G.) The New India Insurance Company Limiged, through Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, Kachahri Chowk, Jail Road Raipur (C.G.) ( ; mm WWW mm§wm . § HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA5PUR M A NO 1140 of 2005 APPELLANT Mi+hun Dhidhi, aged nbou‘l“ 16 . yrs., Rio Tafiband Bas’fi, P.5. Amanaka, Raipur', Tahsil & Disfric‘f Raipur (6.52). On behalf Claimant ’ of (appellan'r) minor child Knlyan Dhidhi, aged abou'r 33 yrs., S/o Bondar Dhidhi: R/o Ta‘l'iband Basfi‘ P.5. Ammaka, Dis‘rric‘r Raipur' (C.6.) u. . Vs RESPONDENTS 1. Narayan Verma, aged abouf 55 year-s, S/o Shobhif Ram Verma, R/o Village & Posh Mahra, P.S. Suhela, Tah. Balodn Bazar, Non—uppiican‘r‘s Dis‘H'. Raipur ‘(C.G.) ‘ 2. Gulab Ram Verma, 5/0 N.P. Verma, R/o ViHage & Posf: Mohm, P.5. Suheia, Tah. Baloda Baznr, Disf‘r. Raipur' (CG) 3. The New India Insurance Company Limi‘l‘ed, fhrough Divisional Manager, Divisianai Office, Kachahari Chowk, Jail Road: Raipur (CE) Presenti Mr: 5.6. Verma, Adv. for fhe appellant ORAL JUDGMENT (Passed on 23/04/20OT) XI-HC-22 This is claimanf’s appeal for enhancemen'r of compensm‘ion, as The iciaims fribunai has awardec a sum of Rs.1,000/- +0 The appellan‘r fowair‘ds The injuhies susfained by him in a mo'ror vehicle accidenf dafed 16.3.2002. Learned counsei for The appellan'r submh‘s fha'r fhe ciaims Tribumf has awarded a paHr'y sum of Rs.1,000X-, fhough The appelian'r has sustained grievous injuries in'fhe said accident as is evidenf from Ex.P-10 X-ray repor'r Tha‘r +he uppeilan‘i was admii’fed in fhe hospi'i‘al for frea'i'men‘r, soleiy'on fhe gr nd fha‘r no 'l'reafmeni' papers or proof of ddmission of The appellanT in Tribunal. Taking inTo consideraTion ThaT reasons assigned by The Tribunal ThaT The appellanT has failed To prove any grievous injury susTained by him in The said accidenT and regarding his admission for TreaTmenT in The hospiTal, as menTioned in P agraph 14 of The award; no ground is available To The appellanT To chal Therefore, The appeal be ng devoid of any subsTance is liable To /’¢5 x‘« be dismissed and accordingly, iT is hereby dismissed. / i ‘ 1 he hospi‘rai has been iven before fhe g fie ‘enge The impugned award. , ///..,/Wj@‘/ awew i //;/ 9 3“d%e (@W)