IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION Nos.245/2002 to 249/2002 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- M/S A.M. RAVJI & CO. THRO' PROP.NISHANT SNEHALBHAI PAREKH Versus SURYA INDUSTRIES THRO' ITS PARTNER DHANJIBHAI DEVRAJBHAI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Criminal Application Nos.245 to 249 of 2002 NANAVATY ADVOCATES for Petitioner No. 1 in all RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 1 MR RC KODEKAR, APP for Respondent No.2 in all matters -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA Date of decision: 12/09/2003 COMMON ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.N.D.Nanavaty for M/s Nanavaty Advocates, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner in all the petitions, has made a statement at the bar that in the matters which arose from the complaint which has been filed by the respondent-complainant before the court below, parties have arrived at a settlement and for making payment, petitioner requires some breathing time. Terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties to that effect have been enumerated in writing. In these circumstances, Mr.Nanavaty sought permission to withdraw these petitions with a request that court below may be directed to accommodate the parties for the purpose of finalising their settlement. In view of the above, all these petitions stand disposed of as withdrawn. Rule discharged. Interim relief vacated. Court below shall take it in true spirit that the parties can solve the problem if a joint request for accommodation is made by the parties. Liberty to move in case of difficulty. In view of the aforesaid order of withdrawal, note also stands disposed of. Office is directed to keep a copy in each petition. (R.P.DHOLAKIA,J.) radhan/