C.R. No. 6353 of 2009 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 6353 of 2009 Date of Decision: November 4, 2009 Gurlal Singh and others …..Petitioners Vs. Ram Kumar …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) It is contended that an application under Order 41 Rule 5 CPC filed by the defendant-petitioners is not being decided despite the fact that order of rejection of appeal for want of Court fee stands cured by payment of Court fee. It is stated that first appeal stands admitted. The sole prayer made in the present revision petition is that a direction should be given to Additional District Judge, Bathinda to decide the application under Order 41 Rule 5 CPC, as the respondent- decree holder of a decree for specific C.R. No. 6353 of 2009 [2] performance is taking steps to dispossess the petitioners despite the pendency of their first appeal. Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the Additional District Judge is on leave till November 17, 2009 whereas the next date of hearing before the lower Appellate Court is November 21, 2009. This petition is disposed of with a direction to the Additional District Judge, Bathinda to dispose of the application under Order 41 Rule 5 CPC on November 21, 2009 or on any other date fixed by the said Court for the said purpose. Status quo regarding the possession of the property in dispute will be maintained till November 21, 2009. November 4, 2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE