In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … COCP No. 52 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision: September 18, 2009 Ex. Havaldar Ajit Singh .. Petitioners Versus Paramjit Sisngh Saini ..Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr. Munish Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Geeta Singhwal, Advocate for the respondent .. Rakesh Kumar Garg,J(Oral) It is not in dispute that legal notice dated 2.6.2008 issued by the petitioner has been disposed of by the respondent by passing an order and in pursuant to that order,the respondent have also released the retiral benefits as per their calculations and nothing remains to be paid now. However, learned counsel for the petitioner disputes the aforesaid stand taken by the respondent and states that still the petitioner has not been granted any amount on account of pension gratuity and provident fund etc. Be that as it may, since the Respondent has disposed of the legal notice of the petitioner and has also paid the amount whatever was found due according to them. I am not inclined to proceed further with this petition. However, the petitioner is at liberty to seek any other alternative remedy for redressal of his grievance in accordance with law. Rule discharged. September 18, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE