1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.1485 OF 2011. (Balkrishna Sukhdev Marathe and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and five others) _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Shri Mohammed Atique, Advocate for the Petitioners. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 13, 2011. During hearing Atique, Advocate pointed out that in Writ Petition No.3376/2011 involving identical challenge this Court has on 02.09.2011 permitted writ petition to be withdrawn with liberty to make representation to the State Government. Here representation has been made on 22.10.2010 to the State Government. He seeks leave to make a detailed representation, pointing out various judgments on behalf of the petitioners and seeks its time bound disposal. Shri T.R. Kankale, the learned AGP 2 appearing for the respondents states that he is still awaiting instructions and therefore, seeks an adjournment. In the light of the order dated 02.09.2011 passed in Writ Petition No.3376/2011, we have rejected the request of the learned AGP. We permit petitioners time of four weeks to make appropriate supplementary representation to the State Government on behalf of all of them. If such representation is received, the State Government shall consider the same as early as possible and within a further period of four months thereafter. With this liberty to the petitioners and directions to the State Government, writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE NSN