1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2926 OF 2009. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS RAJENDRA @ BABBU RAMPRASAD MISHRA AND OTHERS ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mrs. K. S. Joshi, APP, APP for applicant State. Shri Harshad Bobde, Advocate for the respondents no.1 to 4. Coram : A.H. JOSHI, J. Date : 5th April, 2010. 1. This is an appeal by State challenging the judgment and order passed by the Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Trial No.46 of 2006. 2. The accused respondents were tried for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 452, 456, 323 r/w Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The learned Sessions Judge found that the testimony of various prosecution witnesses was not just incoherent, but was found untrustworthy. 4. The testimony of eye witness PW-4 also did not support the prosecution. 5. The findings of the learned Sessions Judge are not found to be contrary to record. The injuries 2 suffered by victim are minor manner and are shown to be possible by fall while running. 6. In this background, the appeal does not merit any interference. 7. Application and appeal are rejected. Judge |mule|