IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 16TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 25TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 28647 of 2010(Q) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- C.SOBANA DAS, SATHYAVILASAM, KOTTAMOM, ARAYUR PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI.P.A.SEBASTIAN SRI.SERGI JOSEPH THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY , HOME AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE, DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE, NEW DELHI-110001 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, INTELLIGENCE BUREAU, NEW DELHI-110001. 4. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 5. M.KUNJAPPY KURIYIL, EBNEZAR COLLAGE, PLAVILA, NEAR RAILWAY STATION, THIRUVALLA,673 021. PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.A.SALIM R5 BY ADV. SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIMKHAN, ASST. S.G. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J. --------------------------------------------- W.P.C.NO.28647 OF 2010 --------------------------------------------- Dated 16th September, 2010 JUDGMENT Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for a writ of mandamus to direct respondents 1 to 4 to conduct effective investigation in detail by authorising central investigation agencies like CBI, National Investigation Agency, FERRA and Revenue Intelligence regarding the illegal activities of fifth respondent, receipt of foreign fund and its misuse and diversion, illegal occupation of government land and purchase of vast extent of land under the cover of a Trust and his nexus with terrorist and fundamental groups. According to the petitioner he had submitted Exts.P1 to P4 representations/ Wpc 28647/10 2 complaints and no action was taken so far. 2. If no action is taken on Exts.P1 to P4 complaints, remedy of the petitioner is to file a complaint before the concerned Magistrate under Section 156(3) of Code of Criminal Procedure as held by the Apex Court in Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P (2008 (1) KLT 724). Petitioner is not entitled to directly approach this Court by filing a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India. Petitioner did not produce any materials in support of the allegations raised in this petition. Petition can only be dismissed. Petitioner at this stage submitted that petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE. uj.