IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 7843 of 1999 Between: S. Narayya, S/o. S.Appa Rao, R/o. kakinada, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.P.State Road Transport Corporation, Represented by its Managing Director, Mushirabad, Hyderabad-20. 2 A.P.State Road Transport Corporation, Represented by its Dipot Manager, Kakinada, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to call for the records from the 2nd respondnet and issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring that the Order passed by the 2nd respondnet in proceedings No.Steno/95(28)/99-KKD, dated 6-4-1999 as illegal, unjust, contrary to law, arbitrary, in violation of principles of natural justice, amounts to victimisation, unfair labour practice, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 16 & 21 of the constitution of India; and grant all consequential benefits; and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.K.JAYAPRAKASH RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.C.PRAKASH REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER : The petitioner filed this writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus, declaring that the order passed by the 2nd respondent in Proc.No.Steno/95(28)/99- KKD, dated 06.04.1999 as illegal, unjust and contrary to law. 2. A representation is made on behalf of Sri A.K.Jayaprakash Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, stating that in view of the interim order passed by this Court on 13.04.1999, no further orders are needed. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. _________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J Dated June 19, 2009 KSH