IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA C.M.A. NO :1577 of 2001 Between: Chilakamarthi Vijaya Lakshmi ..... APPELLANT AND Chilakamarthi Sivaramakrishna .....RESPONDENT The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA C.M.A. NO :1577 of 2001 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) When this matter is taken up, Smt. Vijaya Lakshmi, learned Counsel representing the learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant has been living in Ashram and inspite of several efforts made by them and the counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant before the lower Court, they could not secure the presence of the appellant. Learned Counsel for the respondent is called absent. In view of the controversy involved in the matter and in view of the fact that the matter is pending for a long time and in view of the submission made by the learned Counsel that they are not able to secure the presence of the appellant, we feel that it is not desirable to keep the matter pending. At this stage, the learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that liberty may be granted to the appellant to make application for maintenance before the appropriate Court. While reserving such liberty, the CMA is dismissed for the present. _________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari ______________________ Justice B.N. Rao Nalla Date: 15th October, 2009 Nn. THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA C.M.A. NO :1577 of 2001 (Judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) 15th October, 2009