IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 19089 of 2011 Date of decision:9.9.2011 Amarjit Singh and others Petitioner vs. State of Punjab Respondent Present: Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate Mr. Kirat Singh, DAG, Pb Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioners have been summoned as additional accused u/s 319 Cr.P.C. during pendency of the trial in a murder case as they were declared innocent during investigation. Pursuant to the interim order passed by this court the petitioners have already put in appearance before the trial court and have been granted the concession of interim bail. Learned counsel for the complainant has intervened to contend that Angrej Singh has been attributed a specific injury with a barchi on the head of deceased Sarwan Singh and that petitioner Amarjit Singh has been attributed an injury with a fire arm on the person of PW Mukhtiar Singh. In view of the said circumstances, it has been contended that the said petitioners should not granted the concession of pre-arrest bail. I have taken into consideration the facts and circumstances of this case but without explaining in details the merits of the case, I am of the considered opinion that on account of dual version, which has cropped up and which is required to be finally adjudicated upon by the trial court; the petitioners having already appeared before the trial court, they can be granted the concession of pre-arrest bail. The petition is allowed and interim order dated 6.7.2011 is hereby made absolute subject to the condition that they will continue to appear before the trial court and will not absent themselves without any sufficient cause. In case of any complaint of tempering with evidence, it will be open to the complainant to seek the concession of bail. September 9 ,2011 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE