IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16385 of 2010 PRAMOD KUMAR SON OF LATE HARIHAR PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHAINPUR, P.S. SISWAN, DISTRICT- SIWAN, AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SHIOPUR, SAKRA, P.S. ASAW, DISTRICT- SIWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 29.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the parties. The offence alleged is under Sections 341, 323, 504, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. It is submitted that the present case has been filed on false allegation for ulterior purpose, and as such the petitioner is entitled to be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the allegation against the petitioner are very specific and serious in nature, and as such, petitioner does not deserves to be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the parties as also the nature of allegations levelled against him special with respect to the alleged acts of the vehicle in question as also the alleged manner of occurrence, I am not inclined to allow this application and the same accordingly stands rejected. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)