C.W.P. No. 543 of 2011 27.04.2011 Present: Ms. Leena Guleria, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the respondents Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition for the reason that petitioner intends to file a detailed and exhaustive representation bringing on record the hardship faced by him. It is always open for the petitioner to do so. 2. Petitioner undertakes to make a representation within a period of one week from today, which shall be decided by respondent No.2 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt thereof. Needles to add, respondents shall advert to all aspects pointed out by the petitioner, while passing the order. 2. This Court had passed the following orders on 8.2.2011 ad 8.3.2011:- “8.2.2011. CMP No. 656 of 2011 Allowed and disposed of., CWP No. 543 of 2011 Notice. Mr. Vivek Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General accepts notices on behalf of the respondents on whose instructions Mr. R. K. Bawa, learned Advocate General appears. List on 8th March, 2011. In the meantime, reply on behalf of respondents be also filed. CMP No. 661 of 2011 Notice in the aforesaid terms. In case the petitioner has not been already relieved, further action in that regard shall remain stayed till further orders or as otherwise directed. Copy dasti.” “8.3.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been suffering from Arthritis and Hypertension. If that be so, it will be highly risky to him to continue as Driver. Therefore, it will be in his interest to seek for a category change. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to get instruction. Post on 4th April, 2011. Interim order will continue.” 3. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that till such time the petitioner’s representation is decided, the impugned order shall not be implemented. 4. With the aforesaid observations, petition stands disposed of. Copy dasti. April 27, 2011 ( Sanjay Karol ), (rana) Judge.