IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.189 of 2010 NANDU RAM @ NANDU TANTI S/o Late Gopal Ram, R/o Block No.781, Railway Quarter No. 325, Sadar Bazar, Andal, District- Bardman (West Bengal) …Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …OP With Cr. Misc. No. 25783 of 2010 NANDU RAM @ NANDU TANTI S/o Late Gopal Ram, R/o Block No.781, Railway Quarter No. 324, South Bazar, Andal, District- Bardman (West Bengal) …Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …OP ----------- 8/ 27.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It has been submitted that on 04.03.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No.189 of 2010, this Court has refused bail to the petitioner on the report of the trial Court that only three months’ time would be required for concluding the trial. The merits were not gone into. The prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground that he is in custody since 29.12.2008 and despite repeated extension of time for conclusion of trial the same has not been concluded as yet. With regard to the merits of the case, it has been submitted that from the First Information Report itself it is apparent that death of deceased was caused by Akua Singh, who himself died in the transaction and at best the petitioner could be said to have injured the informant. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of `5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other 2 surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, II, Munger, in connection with Sessions Trial No.684 of 2009 arising out of Jamalpur P.S. Case No.121 of 2005, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and another bailor shall be local since the petitioner is the resident of West Bengal. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, and (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. In view of the antecedents of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Muger, within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next nine months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in this period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned. 3 If the Trial Court finds that the petitioner in any manner is disturbing the Court proceeding or is tampering with the prosecution evidence, immediately steps shall be taken for putting him behind the bar. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)