IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 25114 of 2000 Between: C.V Varadaraj S/o Late. C.V Ramanujam R/o 52, Tiruchanur Road , Tirupathi , Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 2 The Land Acquisition Officer & Spl. Dy. Collector, Land Acquisition Tirupathi Urban Development Authority , Tirupathi. 3 C.V Purushotam (died) 4 C.,V Tiruvengadem S/o Ramanujam R/o 19-94 (A) , Kenedy Nagar , Tiruchanur bye-pass Road , Tirupathi , Chittoor District. 5 M.D Vedavalli W/o Late. C.V.Purushotam R/o Block No.26, C-19, Boiler Road , Neyveli, Tamilnadu . 6 C.V Devarajulu S/o Late. Ramanujam R/o 85 , Nehru Street , Tirupathi , Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or other appropriate Writ, Order or direction commanding the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupathi (1st Respondent) to process with the enquiry under section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act in O.P.No.84/1988 and decide the question as to who is entitled to receive the compensation and to pass such other order or orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.JAYASURYA Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2: AGP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25114 of 2000 ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for a writ of Mandamus or other appropriate writ or order with the following substantial reliefs: “to direct the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupathi (1st respondent) to proceed with the enquiry under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act in O.P.No.84 of 1988 and decide the question as to who is entitled to receive the compensation and to pass such other order or orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” At the hearing, Sri N.Jayasurya, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 01.08.2008 v v