BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Monday, the Nineteenth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD)No.12407 of 2011 1 JAYAKUMAR 2 RENUKA DEVI :PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1&3 -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, (SPECIAL CELL FOR LAND GRABBING) SOOLAKARAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR & DT, CRIME NO.37/11 :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.PERUMAL Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 420, 465, 467 and 468 I.P.C. in Crime No.37 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that even though the petitioners had already been enlarged on anticipatory bail by this court, but the respondent name has wrongly mentioned, they were not able to surrender before the court for executing the sureties within the time stipulated by this court and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor(Crl.side). 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and also considering the fact that even though the petitioners had already been enlarged on bail, but the respondent name has not correctly mentioned, they were not able to surrender before the court for executing the sureties, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No:II, Virudhunagar and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which, the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 19/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO:1.The Judicial Magistrate No:II, Virudhunagar. 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Virudhunagar @ Srivilliputhur. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, (Special Cell for Land Grabbing), Soolakkarai, Virudhunagar District. +1. CC to M/S. V.PERUMAL Advocate SR.No.32019. RP/20.09.2011/1P/6C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12407 of 2011,Date :19/09/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/