IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 29 OF 2008 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 29 OF 2008 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 29 OF 2008 Mr. Sunil Baran Das .... Petitioner versus Mrs. Sapna Das ...... Respondent. Mr. A.P.Mundargi i/b Sajan Oommen for then petitioner. Mr. Shashank Thatte for Respondent no.1. Mrs. M.H.Mhatre APP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 17TH JANUARY, 2008 DATED; 17TH JANUARY, 2008 DATED; 17TH JANUARY, 2008 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. An interlocatury order passed by the Family Court NO.6, Bandra, during pendency of proceedings under section 125 of Cr.P.C. directing the petitioner husband to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.30,000/- per month to the respondent wife is challenged by the husband by filing this Writ Petition. By consent of parties, the order dated 22-11-2007 is not interfered with. Both the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties submit that the main petition No.B-47/07 claiming maintenance, itself be directed to be heard and decided as expditiously as possible after affording the parties reasonable opportunity to place on record relevant documents and by leading appropriate evidence in that regard. In this view of the matter the writ petition needs to be disposed of as not pressed, to the extent it challenges the quantumn of interim maintenance. The Family Court is directed to decide the petition as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of six months from today. The payment of Rs.30,000/- per month as directed by the Family Court shall be without prejudice to the rights of the parties, and in the event, the amount determined finally is less than Rs.30,000/- the amount already paid in excess shall be adjusted. Writ Petition is disposed of in above terms. .....