> HIT OF CHHATTiSGARi-I: BELASPUR Wrii Petition {$3 No. 16%0 of 2€3§8 Petiiioner Laxman Ram ‘Sahu, S/o. Aghanu Ram Sahux aged abcut 53 years, ‘occupation — Assistant Teacher, Government Primary Schoo}, Toota, Bloc! — Abhanpur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Versus ‘1) We State of Chhattisgar‘n,’ through Secretary, Education Department, DKS. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 2) The Director, Pubiic instructions, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, District Raipur (Chha‘rtisgarh). 3) The‘ District Education Offmer, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), 4) The Biock Education Officer, Abhanpur, Diszrict Raipur (Chhattisgarh), Resgondents ‘(Wrii Petition under Articie 226 of rhe Constitirtion of indie.) SB: Hon’cie Mr. Satish K. Agnihcrri, J. ?resent: ShrFSanjay‘TDaieif cchhsei ior the‘cefifidc’eri’m “ ' Shri Aiok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for t. e State ORAL ORDER (Fassezi 9n 2““ day cf Mair. 2mg ) __;, _. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the‘peiiiioner does not want to contest this petition at this stage, however, he confines his prayer for consideration of his representation dated 23-1 2068 (Annexure Pm) pending before the respondents—authority 2) Learned counsel appearing for the respondents!8tate submits that there is no objection for consideration of the representation of the petitioner before the respondents authority. 3) in View of foregoing, prayer for direction to the respondents-authority to consider the representation dated 29-1 2008 (Annexure PM) is aiiowed. 4) The petition is accordingiy disposed of.