THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3841 of 2010 Dated:17.09.2010 Between: Sirra Venkatarao. ….Petitioner And Yadlapalli Nageswara Rao. …Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3841 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is the defendant in the suit filed by the respondent, being O.S.No.678 of 2008, on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Nidadavolu, for recovery of certain amount based on a promissory note. The scribe of the promissory note who is also Secretary of Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society (PACS) was examined as P.W.2. The petitioner’s Counsel subjected him to lengthy cross examination. Thereafter, the petitioner filed I.A.No.175 of 2010 purportedly under Order XVI Rule 1(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), to summon P.W.2 to produce the attendance register. The same was dismissed by the Court below on 22.03.2010, aggrieved by which, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the production of attendance register of PACS, Samisragudem, is relevant because according to P.W.2 the suit promissory note was scribed during Office hours of the Society. As rightly observed by the Court below, when P.W.2 was subjected to lengthy cross examination and adequate opportunity was available to the petitioner, no purpose would be served by summoning the attendance register. The impugned order does not suffer from such grave error, which is not capable of being corrected by appellate authority at a subsequent stage under Section 105(1) of CPC. The Civil Revision Petition is, therefore, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 17.09.2010 vs