HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3398 OF 2009 ORDER: Petitioners filed O.S. No.1228 of 2004 in the Court of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool, against respondents for the relief of perpetual injunction to restrain them from alienating or assigning the suit schedule property. According to the petitioners, the suit schedule property is under their occupation for the past 30 years and the 1st respondent has been collecting rents from them. Respondents filed written statement opposing the suit. The plaint was also amended on certain aspects. 2. Petitioners filed I.A. No.994 of 2006 with a prayer to implead the District Collector as defendant No.3. The application was opposed by the respondents. Through order dated 16-04-2009, the trial Court dismissed the I.A. Hence, this revision. 3. Heard Sri G. Ramachandra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Petitioners claim the relief of perpetual injunction in the form of a direction to the respondents not to alienate the suit schedule property by way of assignment or otherwise. In other words, the petitioners proceeded on the assumption that the 1st respondent is the owner of the suit schedule property and that they have derived certain rights in it. At a later stage, they wanted the District Collector to be impleaded. The cause of action, if any, against him is totally different. At any rate, the petitioners did not seek relief in the form of declaration as to their right. The trial Court has taken a correct view of the matter. 5. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J December 14, 2010. KTL