IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15487 of 2010 LUV KUSH SINGH, SON OF LATE HARIHAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12/05/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 436 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that for misuse of privilege of bail for a period of 23 years, the petitioner has remained in custody since 5.3.2010, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Hilsa, in Sessions Trial No. 243 of 2010 arising out of Chandi P.S. Case No. 37 of 1985 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. - 2 - The trial court is directed to conclude the trial positively within a period of nine months since the case is of the year 1985. For this reason, the trial court will bring into service Sections 62 and 66 Cr. P.C. for summoning of the witnesses so that there is no unnecessary delay in conclusion of the trial. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)