IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-30228 of 2009 Date of Decision: December 07, 2009 Gurcharan Singh @ Sonu @ Batta … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present : Mr. J.S.Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Arshvinder Singh, DAG, Punjab. ****** S.D. Anand, J. Though the two co-accused of the petitioner were allowed bail (one by a Coordinate Bench and another by this Bench on 27.08.2009 and 15.10.2009 respectively), there is no fact of commonality between those who were allowed bail and the petitioner herein inasmuch as the main kirch blow is attributed to the petitioner only. Learned counsel for the petitioner has a grievance that even the charge has not been framed inspite of the fact that the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. was filed on 09.08.2008. The matter is presently fixed for 12.12.2009 for consideration of charge. On consensual basis, this petition shall stand disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Court to positively conclude the trial itself by or on 31.03.2010. In case the trial is not concluded by that period, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. The State shall also be under a liability to conclude its evidence by the date aforementioned. The acknowledgment (of copy of this order) issued by the concerned Judicial Officer shall be forwarded to the Registry of this Court. Learned Sessions Judge shall himself maintain a tab to ensure that the case is disposed of by aforementioned date. December 07, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vinod Judge