IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 9557 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.M.PANCHAL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? @ MUKTI FOUNDERS & ENGINEERS Versus RAMESH H VAGHELA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 9557 of 1992 MR YN OZA for Petitioner No. 1 MS KB NAIR for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE J.M.PANCHAL Date of decision: 03/09/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner has produced letter dated November 25, 1998 addressed to him by the petitioner for perusal of the Court. It is ordered to be taken on record of the case. In the letter, it is mentioned that the matter has been settled outside the Court, with the representative of the Workers' Union and, therefore, the petition be withdrawn. In view of the contents of the letter dated November 25, 1998, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the respondent has not opposed the prayer. Permission as prayed for is granted. Rule is discharged with no orders as to costs. Interim relief granted earlier is hereby vacated. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. ( J.M.Panchal, J.) (patel)