HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No:683 OF 2004 ORDER: This revision is directed against the docket order dated 5.12.2003 in C.C.Sr.No.7432 of 2003 whereby the learned X Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad, returned the bundle stating that cause of action has not arisen. It appears that the 1st respondent herein instituted O.S.No.756 of 1996 before the XVII Junior Civil Judge-cum-Principal Rent Controller, Secunderabad, for recovery of money and in the said suit certain documents were marked. Stating that the said documents are forged and fabricated, the present complaint has been filed and as stated supra, the same is returned. Heard. The docket order dated 5.12.2003 reads as under: “So far Civil Court had not concluded that it is fabricated document. Hence cause of action not surfaced. Hence returned.” This Court is of the view that the Court below is justified in refusing to entertain the said complaint. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the said suit was decreed. The Civil Court as on that day has not given any finding with regard to the said documents. In those circumstances, this Court is of the view that the order under revision does not require any interference and hence, the revision is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. __________________________ Justice Gopala Krishna Tamada Dated: 24.2.2011 Nn HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No:683 OF 2004 24.2.2011