IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.617 of 2010 1. DHANANJAY KUMAR RAY S/O JAI PRAKASH RAI R/O VILL.- DEHRI, P.S. RAJPUR IN THE DISTRICT OF BUXAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE CHIEF SECRETARY, BIHAR 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR 4. SUNIL KR., SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SARAN, CHHAPRA 5. SUNIL KR., SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ARA, BHOJPUR - CUM - THE CHAIRMAN SARAN REGIONAL POLICE APPOINTMENT SELECTION COMMISSION 6. RAMPRAVESH SINGH, ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, SARAN, CHHAPRA 7. OM PRAKASH BHAT, CHAIRMAN, STATE BANK OF INDIA 8. SANTOSH KR., MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, MAIN BRANCH, CHHAPRA ----------- 05. 08.04.2011 On the earlier occasion i.e. on 31.3.2011 supplementary show cause filed on behalf of opposite party no.5 was rejected as the show cause containing the order passed in compliance of the directions of this Court did not contain the enclosures appended therewith. Having rejected the supplementary show cause, the affidavit was returned to the counsel. Later the merit list which was not appended with the original show cause was obtained and made part of the same show cause and filed in this Court on 4.4.2011. Counsel for the petitioner submits that merit list appended with the order dated 2.11.2010 should have been annexed with the supplementary show cause supported by fresh affidavit, such objection is only 2 technical in nature, as such, not accepted. The contempt petition is rejected in the light of the averments made in the show cause, the order dated 2.11.2010 as also the enclosures appended therewith with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 2.11.2010. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)