IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.CH.SURYA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO : 1829 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 03/11/2004 in WP NO : 20125 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 Goli Venkataramana, S/o. Seetharamaiah, R/o. D.No. 13/317, Near Old Bus Stand, Vempalli Village and Post, Vempalli Mandal, Kadapa District. 2 Bachu Venugopal, S/o. Rangaiah, R/o. Near Z.P. High School, Vempalli Village and Mandal, Vempalli Mandal, Kadapa District. 3 K. Isaac Raja, S/o. Late K. Narayanaswamy, R/o. Near Obulreddi Cotton Mills, Vempalli Village and Mandal, Vempalli Mandal, Kadapa District. ..... APPELLANTS AND 1 Zilla Parishad, Kadapa, through Chief Executive Officer (C.T. is amended as per court order dt. 25-11-2004). 2 District Collector, Kadapa District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Vempalli Mandal, Kadapa District. 4 Grampanchayat Vempalle, Rep. by Executive Officer/Panchayat Secretary, Vempalli Mandal, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENTS For the Appellants: MR. T.V.S.KUMAR, Advocate. For Respondent Nos.2 and 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. For Respodnents 1 and 4: Mr. D. Srinivas, SC for ZPs & Gram Panchayats. The Court at the admission stage made the following Judgment: (per Sri B. Sudershan Reddy, J) We find no infirmity in the order passed by the learned single Judge in disposing of the writ petitioner, which in fact adequately protects the interests of the petitioner. The learned Judge was rightly not inclined to judicially review the very notice issued by the respondents requiring the appellants to vacate the premises/shops on or before 4-11-2004 on the ground that the appellants have already preferred their objections which are required to be taken into consideration. We do not find any reason whatsoever to interfere with the well-considered order passed by the learned single Judge. There is no basis to entertain any apprehension that the appellants are likely to be dispossessed even before passing an appropriate order. In view of the order passed by the learned single Judge, such a course is not open to the respondents. The Writ Appeal is accordingly dismissed. (B. Sudershan Reddy, J) 26-11-2004 (T.Ch. Surya Rao, J) ks To 1 The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Kadapa. 2 The District Collector, Kadapa District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Vempalli Mandal, Kadapa District. 4 Executive Officer/Panchayat Secretary, Grampanchayat Vempalle, Vempalli Mandal, Kadapa District. 5 Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad (OUT). 6 Two CD copies.