c,^I pp c->-' '^-. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUMCATURE AT CHHATTISGARH - BILASPCR w p l7'2c~ /' r"- PETITIONBR -NIHARIKA COMMERCIALS LIMITED - KANKER, WITH ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 7, FARISHTA COMPLEX - RAJPUR, CffiIATTISGASH, THROUGH DIRECTOR - SHEU RAJESH MIRANI, S/0. SHRI MANILAL MIRANI, KESIDENT OF SADAR BAZAR, DHAMTARI (CHHATTISGARH) VERSUS RESPONDENTS/-' ,(1) STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. (6) THE LABOUR INSPECTOR, BLOCK - DURGUK01SIDAL REGION. DISTT. : BASTAR, CHHATTISGARH. (7) THE PRESIDWG OFFICER, LABOUR COURT - JAGDALPUR / THE AUTHORITY, UNDER THE PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT / THE AUTHORITY UNDER THE MINIMUM WAGES ACT, DISTT : BASTAR - JAGDALPUR (CHHATTISGARH) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF FNDIA. _^iA- ;-.-7.. oi.i-'R -'-••. n •^'/^ ";y »E PETITIONER HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.1730 OR 2001 Niharika Commercials Limited, Kanker. RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others 30) (Writ Petition under Article 2261 227 of the Constitution of tndia) Single Bench : Hon'ble ShriSatish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- None forthepetitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe Stete. ORDER (Passed on this 1S day of November, 2011) 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. Noneappears nor is any representation made on behalfof the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. in view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge £lShO;<