IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9426 of 2006 MD.MANSOOR ALI @ MANSOOR ALI Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- For the Respondents : Mr. Harendra Prasad Singh, Advocate for B.S.N.L. ----------- 3 22.08.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner wants quashing of the order contained in Annexure – 5 and 11 to the writ application which relates to the seniority of the petitioner vis-à-vis other Junior Telecom Officers passing their examination and selected to the Junior Telecom Officer exam under 10% qualifying quota held in the year 1984. A batch of writ applications were filed earlier which included this petitioner. The case of one Uma Shankar Jha too came to be heard and disposed of on 02.01.2006 with a direction upon the respondents to consider the matter and pass speaking order. The order dated 28th March 2006 contained in Annexure - 11 has come to be passed. The speaking order lays down the basic background to the dispute and the 2 decision in this regard. It is obvious from reading of the same that the order has been passed, keeping in mind, a judicial order passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi. The adjustment on the seniority had to be done in light of the said judicial intervention. In an identical matter of Uma Shankar Jha, which was C.W.J.C. No. 11246 of 2006 vide order dated 10.04.2007, this court refused to exercise jurisdiction since no legal infirmity was found in the order dated 28.03.2006. The present writ application being no different, it is dismissed accordingly. Rajeev/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)