IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32709 of 2010 MD.KHALID KHAN @ KHALID KHAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 08.09.2010. Leaned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody in a case registered under Sections 385, 386,34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that through several telephone calls ransom was demanded from the informant. The petitioner’s name sprang up on the basis of confession of one Shatrughan Bhagat. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that none of the Mobiles from which the ransom was demanded were found registered in the name of the petitioner. Other accused, namely, Shatrughan Bhagat has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 42322 of 2009. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the nature of allegation and 2 the period under custody, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Patna, in connection with Patna Kotwali P.S. Case No. 354 of 2009. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)