- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.329 OF 2009 APPLICATION NO.329 OF 2009 APPLICATION NO.329 OF 2009 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.254 APPEAL NO.254 APPEAL NO.254 OF 2008 OF 2008 OF 2008 Vinod Prabhakar Ghayal & others ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Ms Juily Parab h/f Ms Revati Mohite Dere for the Applicants Mr.J.P.Yagnik A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 26,2009 : MARCH 26,2009 : MARCH 26,2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the applicants. The applicants have been convicted of the offence under section 308 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants are accused nos.1 to 3. The substantive sentence is R.I. for three years. The applicants have already undergone sentence for 7 months. The 4th accused has been granted benefit of The Probation Offenders Act. The sentence is of a limited duration. The appeal is not likely to be heard before the remaining period of sentence is over. 2. Hence, the application is disposed of by passing the following order : i) The applicants (accused 1 to 3) shall be enlarged on the same bail on which they were released during the pendency of trial subject to filing fresh bailbonds within a period of four weeks from today. - 2 - JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE