IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 20787 OF 2008 Between: C.Seenappa S/o.C.Venkatachalam R/o.Dasarlapalle village V.Kota Mandal, Chittoor District ....PETITIONER AND 1.The Station House officer, V.Kota Police station, Chittoor District 2.Kummara Prakash Babu S/o.K.Keshavulu R/o.Dasarlapalle village V.Kota Mandal Chittoor District 3.Mekalappagari Satish S/o.M.Muneppa R/o.Dasarlapalle village V.Kota Mandal Chittoor District 4.Raghava S/o.Mariappa R/o.Dasarlapalle village V.Kota Mandal Chittoor District 5. Kummara Uday Kumar S/o.K.Subramanyam R/o.Dasarlapalle village V.Kota Mandal Chittoor District ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Habeas corpus directing the respondents to produce Kumari C.Chandana,D/o.Venkata chalam, R/o.Dasarlapalle village, V.Kota Mandal, Chittoor District detained by the respondents No.2&3 before this Hon’ble court and she may be ordered to be released forthwith after declaring her detention as illegal and void. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.T.PRADYUMNA KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 20787 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: (per the HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA) This writ petition has been ﬁled, seeking to issue a writ of Habeas corpus, directing the respondents to produce one Kumari C.Chandana, D/o. C.Venkatachalam, resident of Dasarlapalle village, V.Kota Mandal, Chittoor District, detained by the respondent Nos.2 & 3, before this Court and she may be ordered to be released forthwith after declaring her detention as illegal and void. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, representing learned Advocate General, appearing for the respondents, submits that the alleged detenue was traced and handed over to the custody of her parents, which fact has been acknowledged by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3. In view of the same, nothing remains for adjudication in this writ petition and the same is liable to be closed. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ---------------------------------- JUSTICE D.S.R. VARMA ------------------------------- JUSTICE K.C.BHANU DATED: 21-10-2008 Hsd