IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.141 of 2010 ==================================================== 1.THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE D.I.G.(KARMIK AND BHARTI) MAHA NIDESHALAYA INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE CENTRAL OFFICE PARISAR KHAND-2 LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI-03. 2. THE D.I.G. (KARMIC AND BHARTI MAHA NIDESHALAYA INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE CENTRAL OFFICE PARISAR KHAND-2, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI-03. 3. THE D.I.G. (GANGTOK), ZONAL OFFICE INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE HOME MINISTRY, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, P.O. SAMDUR TADONG, GANGTOK (SIKKIM):--- RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS. Versus 1. AJEET KUMAR, SON OF LATE NAGESHWAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MOKARI, POLICE STATION- ARWAL, DISTRICT- ARWAL:-- PETITIONER/RESPONDENT. ==================================================== 04. 13.07.2011. Heard learned counsel for the review petitioners as also the writ petitioner. 2. The plea to review the order dated 2.4.2010 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 5059 of 2010 has been raised on the ground that while passing the said order this Court was not informed by the writ petitioner that his candidature stood rejected on 27.6.2009 on merit vide rejection-slip of the same day appears to be wholly misconceived as during the hearing of the writ petition this Court was not informed about such fact. Even with the review petition counsel for the review petitioners have not annexed the receipt showing service of the proceedings of the Medical Board dated 27.6.2009 on the writ petitioner. 2 3. In the circumstances, I am unable to hold that the writ petitioner is responsible for not communicating the result of the Medical Board dated 27.6.2009 to this Court. Counsel for the review petitioners then submitted that the result of the Medical Board dated 27.6.2009 was communicated to the writ petitioner under letter dated 15.2.2010 which was addressed to Shri Arvind Prasad Singh, Advocate for the writ petitioner. With the review petition receipt showing service of letter dated 15.2.2010 has not been annexed. 4. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to rely on the contents of the letter dated 15th February, 2010. The review petition is dismissed. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)