^?.. \^ HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVjSEON BENCH Coram : HON'BLE SHRS RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRE SUNIL KUIVIAR SiNHA, J. APPELLANTS RESPONDENTS: M.A.CONo. 723 of 2008 1. Smt. Neelam Singh aged 28 years W/o Late ShrEkant Singh 2. Smt;' Munri Devi, aged 60 years, M/o Late Shrikant Singh 3. Ku. Jyoti Singh; aged 10 years, D/o Late Shrikant Singh 4. Ku. Monisha Singh, aged 8 years, D/o Late Shrikant Singh. 5. Shivam Singh, aged 5 years; s/o Late Shrikant Singh (appeilant no.1 as Natural Gardian for appeSSants no. 3-5) (all above resident of Qr. No. 2B, Street no.69, Sector No.6, BhlEai, District Durg (C.G.) Versus 1. Vinod Pradhan, aged 30 years, S/o Sagar Pradhan; R/o sector 11, Zone- E(, Khursspaar Bhjlai, District Durg (C.G.) (Driver of offending VehicSe NO.CG-04-J-0884) 2. Jagdish Singh Kupadae, aged 22 yr, S/o Meer Singh Kupadae, R/o Sector- 3, Khamtarai, District Raipur (C.G.) (Owner of offending Vehicle No.CG- 04-J-0884) Branch Manager The Oriental Snsurance Company TSirough; Regionai IVianager., Branch-2, Ralpur (C.G.) (Insurance Company of offendlng Vehicle No.CG-04-J-0884) MISCELLAEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHSCLESACT.1988 f ^'^ '-•^^^^ \.>^ K-^ padma ^*. Present: None for the appeliants. O RD E R (18th November, 2008) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, CJ.: None for the appeilants. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left wlth no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge il