IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1226 of 2008 GUDDU BHAGAT S/O KAILASH BHAGAT R/O VILL- ASANDI MAHUAWA, P.S. KUEHAIKOTE DIST. GOPALGANJ ---- PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR --- OPP. PARTY. For the Petitioner : Mr. Ghulam Rabbani, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh APP ----------- 02 30.06.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 30.08.2008, passed by the learned Fast Track Court no. IVth, Gopalganj in Sessions Trial no. 63 of 2008, whereby his application filed under Sections 227 and 228 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been considered and rejected. The petitioner is facing charge punishable under Section 307 of the Penal Code. As per allegation in the F.I.R., there was scuffle between the parties. Petitioner is said to have fired from his gun, and thereafter assaulted the daughter of the informant with the butt of the gun causing injury on different parts of the body including head and temporal region. The doctor has found grievous head/temporal injuries on the informant’s daughter. Contention of the petitioner is that there is case and counter case. It is next contended that from the materials available on record the intention to kill the injured cannot be necessarily inferred. Learned trial Court has considered entire aspect of the 2 matter and has come to a conclusion that as per allegation the petitioner is said to have caused grievous injury on the head of the daughter of the informant. It has also taken into note that there are altogether five injured persons in the present occurrence. On a conspectus of the entire materials available on record, the learned trial Court has come to a conclusion that materials available on record would justify framing of charge under Section 307 of the Penal Code. This Court finds absolutely no infirmity and/or illegality in the order meriting interference. The application has not merit. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)