EFORE TEE M,P' STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNA BENCH M RAIPUR (ma) w ’9/$)QéyS(/0J/ Manik. Lal Roy son of Lalli Ram Roy, Resident of village Kumhari P.O. Mawahi, Distt.Bi1aspur,M.P. 2Q Hem Singh Rathod; aged 36 years, son of Shri Juggu Réthod, Resident of Village 8c Post Bacharwarmz, Via. Pendra, Bi1asPur (M.P.) 3. Smt. Basanti Devi wife 0f Suraj Pal Singh Eghel, R esident of Mukam Lohar'iw P.O. Marwahi,Distt.Bi1aspur, ...A22 licauggg. VERSUS 1. Stata cf M3. T hrough Secretary School Educaticn Bepartment Va11abh Bhawan Bh-opal M.P. 2, Joint Director, Publ ic Instruct ion, Educ at ion Divis ian, Bilaspur (M .P.) 3. Deputy Directors, Educat ion Publ 1c Instruction Educat ion Department , Educat ion D istrict Bilasp ur (M .P.) DETAILS w AP?LICATICN ORIGINAL APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 $ Tm ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUML ACT. Iqgl 1. PARIIgUIARS 5F THE MPLICANTS g- As above in the cause title of the petition. . . . ,Non—Appl ic2ant s .GU2 L \¢ :Ho' e h'Mi w 0342-2010 Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, coun sel for the petitioner. r Ms. Sunita Jain, Pane! Lawye With the consent of the parties, Counsel for the petitioner want iibeity to me fresh representation befo the circular dated 09-06-2008. He ho ever submits that direction may be xpeditiously to which counsel for the issued for deciding his representation State has no objection. Accordingly, the writ petitio aforesaid iiberty. The representation i of two months from the date of recei expected to be decided by the compe it is made clear that this Court the merits of the case and the author decide the representation strictly in amordance with law. the Statdrespondents. the matter is heard finally. to withdraw the present petition with e the State of Chhattisgarh in View of is dismissed as withdrawn with tiled by the petitioner within a period t of copy of this order, the same is nt authority within a further period of has not expressed any opinion upon ities concerned would be at liberty to [new r