UIGH COIWT OF CHI-WTTISG^UW AT BILASPUR MTOTdreTITIQMiIlJMa^grsilSMg; PETITIONER RESPQNDENTS Maiyadeen Sii^h, S/o Shri Chunnl Lal Singh, Aged about 44 years, R/o Village & Post Tokapai, Tahsil J^idalpur, Dislrid Bastar, (C.G.) VERSUS 1.8tate of OhhaUsgarh Through the Secretary, Tribal Welfafe Department, Minisby, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, ft.G.) 2. The Assistant Commtssloner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jagdalpur, District Bastar,(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 228 OF TME CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (S B: Hon'ble Mr. JusUce SatisH K. Agnlhotri) Present: Mr. Atok Dewangan, Advocate for the petftiener. Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Advocatefor tha responctenls/State. ORE^ft ff>assed on thisl^'day of July, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for ttie petttloner as wsB as for ttie State/respondents Jointly submlt that the fact and quesUon <rf taw invotved in the present writ peBBon are the same to that ofin Yashwant Kumar Bhara<hyaj Vs. Municipal Corporatton, Durg aid another {2006 (II) MPJR-CO 96}, whtoh has been dispwed of vide i.order dated 03.04.2006. Leaned counsel appeartng lorthe respondents does not controvert thesaidsubmisston. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms ctf the order p^sed in Uie case of Yashwant Kumar BharadwaJ Vs. Munlcipat Corporation, Durg and anottier (Supra), subiject to yerifieation of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examinatlon Certificate on his own expenses as perthe ciroutaisdated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether he has bsen pakl two advance incremente or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- . Satish K.Agnihotri . Judge