IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2011 / 21ST ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 27022 of 2011(C) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- M/S.SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO.LTD. 123, ANGAPPA NAICKER STREET, CHENNAI 600001, HAVING ITS BRANCH AT THIRUVAMPADI JUNCTION ALAPPUZHA, REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER RAJESH, AGED 29, S/O.RAJAN UNNITHAN. BY ADV. SRI.E.M.MURUGAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ VIJAYAN S, S/O. VIJAYA SARASS MANNANCHERRY PO, ALAPPUZHA 688 538. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: STU WP(C).No. 27022 of 2011(C) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 IS THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF ORDER DT.30.6.2009 OF CDRF ALAPPUZHA. EXT.P2 IS THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 IS THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4 IS THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS OF THE RESPONDENTS TO LOAN ACCOUNT. EXT.P5 IS THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF NOTICE IN EP.NO.33/2011 IN CC 154/2008. EXT.P6 IS THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE EXECUTION PETITION EP.33/2011 IN CC 154/2008. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY/ P.A TO JUDGE STU ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 27022 of 2011 C ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 13th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petitioner was the respondent in C.C.No.154/2008 on the file of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Alappuzha. Considering the evidence adduced by both sides, the Forum disposed of the case by Ext.P1 order dated 30.06.2009. Complainant filed Ext.P6 execution petition, in which, Ext.P5 notice has been issued. At this stage, the writ petition has been filed, seeking stay of the execution proceedings, contending that the petitioner intends to file an appeal against Ext.P1 order and that a copy application has already been filed for that purpose. 2. I am not inclined to agree with the learned counsel for the petitioner. As already seen, the order was passed way back on 30.06.2009. Not only that the petitioner has not filed any appeal but has only applied for a certified W.P.(C) No.27022/2011 : 2 : copy. This itself shows the laches on the part of the petitioner disentitling them for any indulgence from this Court. Writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/13/10 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge