IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRIMINAL REVISION NO.1889 OF 2011 DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 04, 2011 Arun Aggarwal .....Petitioner VERSUS Sonika and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Hari Om Attri, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The husband has filed this petition to challenge the award of maintenance in this case being excessive. The wife has also filed a petition to challenge the maintenance on the ground that it is too less. In the Criminal Revision No.1980 of 2011 (Sonika and another Vs. Arun Aggarwal) filed by wife, the Court has passed the following order:- “The wife has approached this Court against the award of maintenance of `5,000/- for her and `1000/- for minor child. Counsel contends that the Family Court failed to assess the income of the respondent-husband whereas evidence was led showing that he was having income not less than `1,30,000/- per month. On this basis, the counsel contends that the compensation awarded is inadequate. Notice of motion. Mr.Hari Om Attri, Advocate, who is present in Court in connected petition on behalf of the husband- respondent, accepts notice and prays for time to have instructions. Adjourned to 8.12.2011.” In view of this order, no case for interference in the petition filed by the husband is made out. This petition is accordingly dismissed. October 04, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE