THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR Crl.R.C.M.P. No. 321 of 2010 and Criminal Revision Case No. 1664 of 2007 Date: 08-02-2010 Between: Mohd. Taj. - - - Petitioner/Accused And The State of A.P., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. - - - Respondent. This Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR Crl.R.C.M.P. No. 321 of 2010 and Criminal Revision Case No.1664 of 2007 JUDGMENT: This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the Petitioner/Accused assailing the Judgment dated 02-11-2007 in Criminal Appeal No.49 of 2007, passed by the learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Warangal, confirming the conviction and sentence imposed by the learned III Additional Assistant Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Warangal, vide judgment in S.C. No.48 of 2007 for the offences punishable under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code. Now Crl.R.C.M.P. No.321 of 2010 is filed by both the parties seeking permission to compound the offence. T h e de facto complainant and the revision petitioner/accused are present. The de facto complainant stated that they have compromised the matter voluntarily and that she may be permitted to compound the offence and the petitioner/accused may be acquitted of the offence under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code by setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed on him. In the circumstances, the de facto complainant is permitted to compound the offence and accordingly Crl.R.C.M.P. No. 321 of 2010 is allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case is also allowed acquitting the petitioner/accused, under Section 320(8) Cr.P.C., setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed on him by the Courts below for the offences punishable under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code. ______________________ B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J. Date: 08-02-2010. DSH