o^ XI-HG—78 T ^rcr'^nzn^zr^ ^ti1<H4i(o, f^cni^y *ll*1Cftl ^RI^» IR^ 200 3TI^T TT^)' (yiI^^T) 3T|iST ^T'f^W ^sffi3T7^Tsh^i<=h Y .:^- ^TTW^^T 3^?T HIGH COURT OF €3HHATT!SGA3?H : BILAgPUR. Writ Petiti PBTITIONE^i Noa-Applseaat N©•3 Sti cr)j^f<n<fli 'HTR^ff ^ fs^l <F3i^i< '^3tRR3TT^T ^n 122TI 2468/2008 (Writ Petition under Artic|Ie 227 of the Constitution of ladi&^ |:e Bank of India, Agriculture Development Br4nch, Rajnandgaon, District-Rajnandgaon thi^ugh its Branch Manager L. P. Shitiva.stav^, State Bank of Tndia, Agriculture Defelopment Branch, Rajnandgoan? District- Raj^iandgaon (CG)| VBRSUS RBSPQNDENTS Applieaats 1 to 4 1 2. 3. 4. Kali] abol Tek) 35^ ^haran, 8/o Sukhnandan Kalar, aged .it 39 years; [a.m, S/o Sukhnandan Kalar^ aged about ^ears; • | ' . ; . / Gor^lal, S/o Siiktinandan Ka!ar,aged about ears, SukF'inandan, S/o Amtritla}, Caste-Kalar, age<^ about 60 years All|R/o Village Tatenga (Bharda), Tahsi] DoL|ndiIohara, District-Dui^(CG) Raj]^l, S/o Manbodhi, Caste-Marar; R/o Pinl|:apar, PS Deori, Tahsil Doundilohara, Disl|rict-Durg (CG) (Dri^er of the Tractor CG-04/ZQ 1159 8s Tro|y No.CG-04/ZQ 1158 Unifed India Insurance Gompany Limited, Reglonal Office Kamthi Line, Rajnandgaon, Disflrict-jRajnandgoari (CG) (Insurer of the acc|dental vehide Tractpr CG-04/ZQ1159} XI-HC—78 ^^T^T R'114) ^T^TTiTT^T 9h^ic?» ^- ?^r T^i^i<n^ ^ti1<H^i<o,if®i<yii^^< HIHCTI tt»*11<»» "^ 200 '-^1- ^TT^?T TR^ ( y<fyi<^T) ^RTOT^f^T^TT^T -Q-Sk 0^.05.2008 DHIRBNDRA MI8HRA. J. Mr. P. Diwakar, Sr.j Advocate for fhe petitioner, Heard, This petitfon is directl dated 15.4.2008, whercby Claims Tnbunal, Balod, appUcatious of fhe petitioi| company to produce fte ori^ Froni penisal of fhe | above applicatioiis were rej| observations tliat on the iasurance coinjpaiiy was di| poUcies have been produced| Thns^ feboi ^erusal o^ fhat fhere is nodispufe befo m question was msured by ofthe same is avaUable on r^ In the considered to cause to the petitioner t^ interfereiice in exercise of tD Coustitation oflndia, tbe opiqion cni<4?<vi€i1i 'HPTOf ^f fs^ <F3i<^i< ^3tfim37i^?r 1L ORD-S-R- Advocate witli Mr, P,R< Patsinkar, |d agaisist fh©order of ABBexiirc P-5, leamed Additional Motop Accident District-Diir^, has rqjected fhe 'r/bank for jdirectmg fh^ iasuraace Inal policy ao<l pnwe fh^ same, i^ipugned order, tt is evident tfaat the [cted hy fhe (Dl^im^ Trihiin^lywith fhe prayer of llie petitipiier/^aBk, fhe t-ected to produce fhe policy aad the |longback, | 1 fhe impugneA order itself^ it is evident be the GlaimsiTnbunaI that fhe vehicle ^he msuraiice compaBy and the policy ^cord. ' •' . • • of this Court, no prejudice is Ekely |y the uiipTigned order which calls for [e jiirisdiction iinder Article 227 of fhe Sd/- Dhirendra^lishra Judge