THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO.13114 OF 2010 ORDER: Heard Sri Naram Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare. At their request, the Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission. The order under challenge in this Writ Petition is the order of the Government dated 02.06.2010 rejecting the petitioner’s request for grant of stay. The Special Deputy Tahsildar, Tribal Welfare, Polavaram, filed a complaint under Section 3 (2) (a) of the Land Transfer Regulations for ejectment of the petitioner from the Schedule land of an extent of Ac.1.09 cents in R.S.No.276/2 of Repalliwada Village, Polavaram Mandal. The Special Deputy Collector (Tribal Welfare), Polavaram, by order dated 17.01.2007, allowed the claim and directed ejectment of the petitioner. The petitioner preferred an appeal before the Agent to the Government and District Collector, West Godavari, Eluru. She also filed W.P.No.17755 of 2007 before this Court. By order dated 23.08.2007, this Court directed the Agent to the Government to entertain, hear and decide the appeal and held that, till such time, the petitioner shall be continued to be in possession of the schedule property and should not be dispossessed therefrom. Thereafter the Agent to the Government, by order dated 21.04.2010, dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioner herein. The petitioner was informed that a further appeal lay against the appellate order, to the Government of A.P., Tribal Welfare Department, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order of the Agent. The petitioner preferred Revision Petition dated 04.05.2010 before the Government, along with a petition seeking stay of all further proceedings including dispossession from the land in question. The Government, by proceedings dated 02.06.2010, rejected the stay petition filed by the petitioner. Except to state that the stay petition, filed by the petitioner, was being rejected the order does not assign reasons as to why the petitioner’s request for grant of stay, pending disposal of the Revision Petition, was being rejected. The impugned order dated 02.06.2010 is, accordingly, set aside. The first respondent shall pass orders afresh in the stay petition within a period of four {4} weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, assigning reasons either for grant of, or rejection of, stay. Pending orders being passed by the first respondent, on the petitioner’s stay application, the petitioner shall not be ejected from the land in question. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. However, in the circumstances, without costs. _______________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J) 11th June 2010 Note: CC by Wednesday B/O RRB