1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 1684 OF 2007 (Gondia Krishi Utpanna Bazar Samiti .v. Smt. Savita Pannalal Bhardwaj) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE, J. 24TH JUNE, 2008. Heard Shri Anoop Parihar, the learned Counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the respondent though duly served. The respondent is the wife of original complainant Pannalal Bharadwaj, who filed complaint under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 before the Labour Court. By the judgment and order dated 31.10.2006, the Labour Court directed the payment of back wages to the respondent in lieu of reinstatement with continuity of services. The Industrial Court, in revision, preferred by the present petitioner, partly allowed the revision and directed the petitioner to pay Rs.30,000/- to the legal heirs of deceased Pannalal. Having heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and having perused the judgment, I find no ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by 2 the Industrial Court. There is no perversity in the finding recorded by the Industrial Court. No case has been made out for interference in the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the petition is dismissed. JUDGE *rrg.