WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226(227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. f $§§§§LE $EN$§§ ® \ 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. I 3 214' 12005 PETITIONER 4/ : Seeta Sahu W/o Shri M L Sahu 8L 5/ 0&- V f D/o Shn M A Sahu, aged about 46 ’1/ “{EEL years R/o Padaavpara, 1n &0nt of \%“«§e' km57 Telephone Kata, Distt. Exchange Bilaspur (co) Karg Road x Q‘ o .q'kh"$‘M ‘ ””“gf‘ly ‘ Q ‘aga‘6‘ A / Versus \ V gwbm’v RESPONDENTS / 1) Stats of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S.Bhawan, G.E.Road, Raipur (C.G.). ; Director of Public Instructions, Govt. } of C G D1rectorate of Education ‘ (D PI Office) Pens1on Bada, Ralpur (C G) Deputy Director of Public Instruction, Education Department, District—Bilaspur (C.G.). Mr. Alok Nigam, counsel for1 Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Govt. A Heard both the counsel. The petitioner’s case is that the year 1982 on a fixed salary of F the tenure, the petitioner’s service vacancy which arose on account petitioner, appointment of other pe then the petitioner is making regular representations, and the Government is of the petitioner. in the year 1997, vide i le State of Madhya Pradesh issued a not paying any heed to the requ order dated 28-8-1997, the er circular to" all the Departments th t the vacancies for the post of Teacher should be filled by appointmen of ad-hoc teachers. But, the State Government is not considering the equest of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the pe itioner submits that the petitioner may be allowed to make a representati n to the respondents State and the Government may be directed to onsider the same and decide after due consideration to which learned G Having heard learned coun el for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the ca e, l am of the opinion that it is a frt case in which the petitioner should be alowed to make a detailed representation raising all his grievances.‘ There ore, the petitioner is allowed to make a detailed representation to respon ent No.2 within a period of 15 days from today, and in turn, respondent N .2 is directed to consider the same and decide in an objective manner aft r considering all the points raised b Advocate has no objection. :he petitioner. dvocate for the State/respondents. she was appointed as ad-hoc teacher in .s.350/~ per month and after completion of s were discontinued.“ Thereafter, for the ofjiscgmitqn of the services of the rson9wa’s made on that post, and since s e . o XI—HC—22 3aW, wan—gr,W WW Wm a)? 13.% 2003 m . .r Wm mm mmmw WWWffWW éawm 6-4-2005