1 jpc/- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 500 OF 2009 Tej Singh Heer Singh Rajpur .. Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Shri Manish Jain, for the Applicant Shri J. P. Kharge, APP for Respondent-State CORAM :SMT. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 4th September, 2009. P. C. 1. Heard. 2. This revision application is filed by the appellant against the order passed by the Additional sessions Judge, Greater Bombay on 8th July, 2009 rejecting the application for discharge filed by the applicant accused under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code. 3. The applicant accused is prosecuted for the offence punishable under Section 392, 397 341, 452 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code as one Jewelry Shop was robbed by the four persons including the accused. 4. It was contended by the learned counsel appearing for 2 the applicant that there is no evidence against this applicant accused. However, the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge discloses that there is some evidence against this accused and so the application for discharge was correctly rejected. I found no need to interfere with the order passed by the learned Sessions Court. 5. The Revision application is rejected. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)