»- l's<' c^ 1 <srg7 / ' @ SINGtEBfN^ IN THE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTAREGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.ISINO. S'^&t /2010 RESPONDENTS ^s> ^s^ .'^^' ^yy t7^ ^y// <^^.y ^"^''^' PETITIONER: 1. Tijau Sahu, S/oShri BaldeoSahu, aged about 62 years, R/o. Village - Bandari, Post - Bhattgaon District Raipyr :(C.G.) VERSUS 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipiu- (e.G.) 2.'' Join Director Finance Account 85 Pension, Anannd Nagar, Rsdpur (C.G.) 3 ' Superintendent Engineer P. W. D. Circle No. 2, Raipur (C.G.) 4. ' Executive Engineer,PublicWorks Department, Baloda Bazar, Raipiir DivisionfC. G. ) WRIT PETmON ITNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTIoA OF INDIA FOR ARESUANGE OF A WRIT IN THE NATU1RE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION; GERTIORART ETC. OR AHY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER : • ~ ! • : ! 1': : •:,.; '. . ; To, XI-HC—78 *<I*<CT! a>*<ra» TS\ ^ww^, ®tTl'H-ii<o,f^di'y^, ,5~^&V/0, ...(?:...^..;.^^-^fcU» 200 M. + ^ sn^i'T^? ('^?f3sis?) air^rw l<(-)i<* ^SH 3n^?T sft*ii<h ^iiwsfOT an^i ^)l*ilCT<4T'T ^W^i ^ ^Zt Tf^R^R ^affiTOSD^r 8B : KON'BLE 20.09.201" Shri Sunil Ottwani, counsel fitir the petitioner. Shri Ajit Sirs.gh, P.L. for the Si|ate. At the outset, counsel for thi be oermitted to withdraw this reoresentation in terms ot' order Court in W.P.iSi No. 3412/2005. H resoondent No. 1 to decide the reoi in accorda.nce with law, as exoeditii the Detitioner is eoing t.o retire on w State counsei submits that entitled for the relief sought for in| subraits that the reoresentation decided by the comDetent authoritv Accordingiy, the Detition is iibertv as aforesaid. If the oetitionel his grievances, the same is expect< authoritv in accordance with law a4 !t is made clear that this Cd on merits ot' the case and the authl mav decide the representation in a; ifc oetitioner submits that iie mav oetition with iibertv to rE&ke [iated 30.6.2010 passed by this fc also orays for a directmn to ihe isentation made w zhe oetitioner >ushr as oossible. He submits that |!& SeDtember20i.O. la.s oer law, tfte oetitioner is not the oresent oetition. He liowever lade by the petitioner would be |in accordance witn law. Bisraissed as withdrswn with the maltes a reoresentation detaihne ;d to be decided bv' the cornoetent :arlv as oossible. rl ^~; G^Q r^?'^1" ^^y^^f-^Q^^1^. d^-T7 /'lt-?^1T^'1 .<..!. !- lldH litJL 'T;AhJi CWSCv... fei.lj.V' 'iJi-JiitlUli rifcv concemed would, if so desire, 'orGance w;xn iaw. Sdf- . ^^^v 3uA^