IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTYFOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 25379 of 2009 Between: Gorantala Subbarao ..... PETITIONER(S) AND The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District and two others. .....RESPONDENT(S) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 25379 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner borrowed a sum of Rs.80,000/- from one Kasula Aruna Kumari. Later, he discharged the said debt in the presence of mediators viz., Medametal China Seshagirirao and A. Nageswararao. Subsequently, disputes arose between Aruna Kumari and Seshagirirao. Since Seshagirirao is the relative of the petitioner, Aruna Kumari contrived a plan to harass the petitioner alleging that he has not discharged the said debt and she got issued three legal notices to the petitioner with different versions. But, however, she did not file any suit and without availing any civil remedies, she approached the respondents 2 and 3 and requested them to recover the amount illegally from the petitioner. The respondents 2 and 3 started summoning the petitioner to the police station and detaining him hours together without registering a crime and threatening that they foist a false case against him. Aggrieved by the action of the respondents 2 and 3, he made a representation to the 1st respondent. As the 1st respondent did not take any action against the respondents 2 and 3, he approached this Court and filed the present writ petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home. 3. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents 2 and 3 are interfering with the petitioner’s peaceful life and liberty without following the due process of law, hence, a direction may be given to the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner’s peaceful life and liberty. 4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and as the dispute between the parties is civil in nature, the writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to the respondents. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with a direction to the respondents 2 and 3 not to interfere with the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioner without following the due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ November 24, 2009 kvr