^ ..^^- ^M^''^.!.^1' .....<<^<^>""" °ro< €^^' t^-3' 3 ^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATORE AT BILASPUR (CG) WRIT PETITION N0» t( ^-/^ OF 2005 BETNEEN Mirza sallm STaig S/o I*ate Late MirzaNasirBaig, aged atoout 46 years,resi<3ent of Om Nagar, Jarhabhata» Tabsil and District Bilaspur (CG)< Deepak sanual S/o I*ate s.K.Samual, aged about 37 years» resident of Ti£ra»Tahsil and District Bilaspar » Arun singh Thalcur S/o Late shrl B»s« Thakur, aged about 45 years, resldent of Kali Mandir Tifra» Tahsil and Dlstrlct Bilaspur • Subhasl'x James S/o Late Wallice <7ames» aged about 50 years^ resident of Village AEneri »Tahsll Takhatpur Dlstrict BJLlaspur (CG)« PETITIONERS A N D Cent Bank» through Its Branch Marxager^ Home Flnance Limited, subsidiary Central Bank of India> surya Bha^an^ Juna Bilaspuir (CG)^ Cent Bank^ Hoine Finance Limited, through its Managlng Director , Bhopal, 9 Area Hills* Jail Road^ Bhopal (MP)^ The Collector^ Bilaspar^ District Bilaspur • Sub Divisionai Maglstrate, Bilaspur District Bilaspar (CG)^ Tahsildar» Bilaspur^ Tahsll and District Bllaspar (CG)* RESPONDENTS WRIT.PETITION UNDER_^ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR PETITIONER RE8PONDENT8 WRIT PETmON No. 4716 of2005 Mirza Salim Vaig & Otliers. VER8U8 Cent Baric & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF TEiE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotrl, J. Present: Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate fbr the petitioner. Shri Subhash Yadav, Advocate for the respondent No. 1&2. Sliri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer forfhe State/respondent No.3to5. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 07U1 day of July, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instmctions, seeks pemiission of this court to withdraw this petition on account of availability of statutoty remedy under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinqfter referred to as <the SARFAESIAct, 2002') by filing an application before the Debt Recovery Tribunal under the provisions ofsection 17 ofthe Act, 2002. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side have no objection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn vvith the liberty, as aforestated. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit