65' HIGH COURTOFCHHAtTISGARH. BILASPUR CORAM: Hon'ble Shri Sunil Kumar Sinha & Hon'ble Shri Radhe Shvam Sharma.JJ. WRIT APPEAL N0.469/2011 APPELLANT RESPONDENTS 1 Smt. Kanti Pandey, Wife of Shri J.P. Pandey, aged about 43 years, resident of HIG-19, Arvindo Enclave, Near Pachpedhi Naka Chowk, Tikrapara, Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department , of Commercial Tax & Registration, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). Sub Registrar, Raipur through S.K. Garhewal, Collectroate Compound, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2f1l OF THE CHHATTI8GARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCHl ACT. 2006 Appearance: Mr. Goutam Bhaduri, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. U.N.S. Deo, Govt. Advocate forthe respondents on advance copy. SUNIL KUMAR SINHAJ. ORALORDER (19.10.2011) Heard on admission. Being aggrieved with the order dated 25.08.2011 passed in W.P. (C) No. 3335/2009, the appellant/petitioner has filed this writ appeal. By the impugned order, the writ Court has dedined to entertain the writ petition which was filed for issuance of direction to respondent ??^%i*SS^ /^^sb '^ ^••^K.^"^si s (ek WRIT APPEAL N0.469/2011 No.2 to comply theorder dated 26.05.2008 passed by the Board of Revenue, Circuit Court, Raipur. Mr. Bhaduri submits that the sale deed executed by one- Keshav Rao Bagde on 24.09.2007, was produced before the concerned authority for registration. The concerned authority did not register the sale deed on the ground that the copies of revenue records were not filed along with the sale deed. TheWrit Court held that inview ofthe provisions of Section 72 of the Registration Act, 1908, the writ petition was not maintainable because the petitioner has a remedy to file an appeal. We have gone through the writ petition as also the writ appeal. In pith and substance, the appellant/petitioner is praying for a direction fbr registration of the sale deed dated 24.09.2007 as the concerned authority has not registered the same on certain grounds. In light of the above facts, the view taken by the Writ Court doesn't appear to be wrong. For the foregoing reasons, we do not find any substance in the writ appeal. The writ appeal, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Rahu! Sd/- R.S. Sharma Judge