IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 306 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 13/10/2008 in WP NO : 11820 OF 2007 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 The Dy. Director, Public Grievances, Railway Board, New Delhi. 2 The Dy. Secretary (PG), East Coast Rly, Bhubneswar. 3 The Sr. Divl. Commercial Manager, E.Co.Railway, Waltair. 4 G.V.Lakshmi, D.No.50-94-15/II, Santhipuram, Visakhapatnam. ..... APPELLANTS AND 1 D.Sadanandarao, S/o Late Hanumantha Rao, Office of the SMR(G) East Cosr Rly., Visakhapatnam. 2 G.V. Lakshmi Door No. 50-94-15/II, Santhipuram, Visakhapatnam. (Respondent No.2 are not necessary to this Appeal) .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: MR.R.S.MURTHY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.K.PURUSHOTHAM The Division Bench of this Full text of Court made the following : Judgment follows on 2nd page THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI A N D THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 306 of 2009 J U D G M E N T : (Per the Hon’ble Smt.Justice T.Meena Kumari) This writ appeal is filed against the orders dated 13-10-2007 in WPMP.No.14686 of 2007 in WVMP.No.552 of 2008 in WP.No.11820 of 2007 whereby the learned single Judge in the facts and circumstances of the case, made the interim order dated 08-6- 2007 as absolute and dismissed the vacate stay petition. 2. The prayer in the writ petition filed by the respondents herein is the in the nature of writ of mandamus to quash the charge sheet No.WCP/SF-5/DSR/Sr.Clerk/07, dated 19-4-2007 and to declare the action of the respondents in conducting enquiry by issuing charge sheet to the first respondent as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and against the principles of natural justice. 3. The learned single Judge has made the interim suspension in WPMP.No.14686 of 2007, dated 08-6-2007 and dismissed WVMP.No.552 of 2008 filed by the appellants-official respondents. The learned single Judge has dismissed the vacate stay petition. But in view of the fact that the matter relates to disciplinary action against the first respondent, we are of the opinion that the first respondent herein and petitioner in WP.No.11820 of 2007 should approach the Central Administrative Tribunal for the reliefs sought in the writ petition. 4. Under the above circumstances, without going into the merits of the case, we give liberty to the first respondent-petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, for the reliefs sought in the main writ petition, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and till such time, the interim order dated 13-10-2008 passed in WPMP.No.14686 of 2007 in WVMP.No.552 of 2008 shall continue. 5. With the above observation, WA.No.306 of 2009 and WP.No.11820 of 2007 are accordingly disposed of at the admission stage. No costs. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY 20-03-2009. I s L ........REGISTRAR To 1. 2.2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WA {KBJ}