IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 15846 of 2009 Between: Mangam Raja Manohar, S/o. Shankara Rao, R/o. Peddapudi, Kuchipudi Centre Post, Movva Mandal, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, PS Indrakaran Police Ordnance Factory Medak Estate, yeddumailaram, Medak District - 502 205. 2 The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Sanga Reddy, Medak District 502 001. 3 The Superintendent of Police, Medak District, at Sanga Reddy - 502 001. 4 Sri S. Ravi, S/o. Not Known, Institute of Learning Medak, Yeddumailaram. 5 Sri R.K. Sharma, S/o. Not Known, Ordnance Factory Board, 10 A SK Bose Road, Kolkata - 700 001. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action fo the respondent No.1 to 3 in not registering petitioner complaint dated 13-4-2009 against the 4th and 5th respondents as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to principles ofnatural justice and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to register petitioner complaint dt. 13-4-2009 and investigate the same as per the procedure laid down in Cr.PC Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.GUTTAPALEM VIJAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO.15846 OF 2009 ORDER: 1 The grievance of the petitioner is that he approached the first respondent and made a complaint against the respondents 4 and 5. But however, as the first respondent refused to register a crime, he approached this court and filed the present Writ Petition. 2 On instructions, the learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that prior to that a case in Cr.No.13 of 2009 was registered against the Deputy Zonal Manager, Additional Zonal Manager and Chief Vigilance Officer i.e. fifth respondent herein on the basis of a complaint given by the petitioner and after completing the investigation in that crime, as no prima facie case was made out, the same was referred as false and in the light of the same, the police filed a final report before the competent Criminal court on 10.6.2009. 3 As the allegations made in the complaint on the basis of which Crime No.13 of 2009 was registered and the allegations made in the present complaint are one and the same, this court is of the view that the police need not be directed to take necessary action. 3 The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. -------------- 19.08.2009 kvsn