IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 16785 of 2008 Between: Vardhinedi Venkata Subba Rao S/o. Basavaiah R/o. Palakonda Mandal, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Bheemavaram, West Godavari District. 2 The Gorintada Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Gorientada Village, Palakonda Mandal, West Godavari District, rep. by its Secretary. 3 Kakarlamudi Sankar Rao, S/o. Venkanna R/o. Lajapathi Raipeta, Palakole Town, West Godavaari District. 4 Election Officer / Cooperative Sub- Registrar, Bheemavaram, Gorientada Village, Palakonda Mandal, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent Rc.No. 796/2008/B, dated 30-7-2008 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT.BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.CHIDAMBARAM The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 16785 of 2008 O R D E R: This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent dated 30.7.2008 under which the petitioner was called upon to show-cause within three days as to why he should not be disqualiﬁed from the membership of the Managing Committee of the 2nd respondent society as arbitrary and illegal. This Court, by order dated 1.8.2008, while leaving it open to the petitioner to submit his explanation to the impugned notice dated 30.7.2008 and also permitting the respondents to proceed with the enquiry, ordered that no orders shall be passed thereupon. When the matter is taken up for consideration today, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had submitted his explanation by registered post on 2.8.2008 and the same was also granted by the 1st respondent on 4.8.2008. It is also brought to my notice by the learned Government Pleader that the election to the President of the 2nd respondent society which was originally scheduled on 4.8.2008 was postponed indefinitely. In the circumstances, no further enquiry is necessary in the writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the explanation of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 26-08-2008 KLP