THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD APPEAL SUIT No. 1496 of 2002 and CROSS OBJECTIONS (Sr) No. 76132 of 2002 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana) Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 18.06.2002 passed in O.S. No. 128 of 1997 by the Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad, awarding maintenance to the respondents payable by the appellant, as detailed in the judgment, the appellant preferred the appeal, while the respondents ﬁled the cross objections, stating that the Court below erred in not granting the maintenance as prayed for by them. When the matter came up for hearing on the last occasion, the counsel appearing for the respondents-cross objectors submitted that the 1st respondent-wife has joined the company of the appellant-husband and both of them are living with their children, and hence no orders need be passed. Today, the counsel appearing for the appellant- husband submits that she has no instructions from the appellant. In the circumstances, placing on record the statement made by the counsel for the respondents-cross objectors that the parties are living together, we dismiss the appeal as well as the cross-objections. No order as to costs. _____________ N.V. RAMANA, J _________________ P. DURGA PRASAD, J 14th November 2011 IBL