THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2903 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner herein is the plaintiff, who filed the suit in O.S.No.79 of 2009 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Srikalahasti, for grant of permanent injunction restraining the defendants therein- respondents herein from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property. Pending disposal of the suit, the petitioner also filed I.A.No.295 of 2009 in O.S.No.79 of 2009 for grant of ad-interim injunction and the trial court by order, dated 24-04- 2009, granted an ad-interim injunction till 03-06-2009. Aggrieved by the same, the 4th defendant filed C.M.A.No.2 of 2001 along with I.A.No.90 of 2009 on the file of the Vacation Judge, Chittoor, and the same were renumbered as I.A.No.77 of 2009 in C.M.A.No.3 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasthi. It is stated that when C.M.A. was filed before the Vacation Court, the Vacation Judge by order, dated 12-05-2009, granted interim order by suspending the order, dated 24-04-2009, passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Srikalahasti, till 25-06-2009. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed. This court by order, dated 26-06-2009, directed both the parties not to harvest any crop or cut the trees or plantations existed in the plaint schedule property. Admittedly, I.A.No.90 of 2009 in C.M.A.No.2 of 2009 on the file of the Vacation Judge, Chittoor, were renumbered as I.A.No.77 of 2009 in C.M.A.No.3 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasthi, and the same are pending before the lower appellate court. The suspension of the injunction order granted by the trial court is an ex-parte order and, therefore, I am of the opinion that the petitioner has got an effective alternative remedy to file an application before the lower appellate court to vacate the said order, dated 12-05-2009. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file an application before the lower appellate court seeking vacation of the order, dated 12-05-2009. If any such application is filed, the lower appellate court may consider and dispose of the same, in accordance with law, after hearing both sides, as expeditiously as possible. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 23-10-2009 Prv