IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 20TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 4091 of 2011(J) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ SAYID FASAL ATTAKOYA THANGAL, S/O.MUSALIYAMVEETIL CHERUKOYA THANGAL, VADAKKEKAD VILLAGE & DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.V.C.MADHAVANKUTTY RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. VADAKKEKAD GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VADAKKEKAD-679562, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, OFFICE OF THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, THRISSUR-680001. 4. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, THRISSUR, OFFICE OF THE DMO, DISTRICT HOSPITAL, THRISSUR-680001. 5. THE HEALTH INSPECTOR, VADAKKEKAD GRAMA PANCHAYATH, GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL, VADAKKEKAD P.O.-679562, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 6. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR-680003. 7. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VADAKKEKAD POLICE STATION, ANDATHODE P.O.-679 564, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 8. MANAGER, TMK REGENCY, VADAKKEKAD P.O.-679562, VADAKKEKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. R1, R4 TO R7 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH R3 BY ADV.SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS, SC FOR PCB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 4091 of 2011 J ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 9th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T Complaint of the petitioner is regarding the inaction on the part of respondents 2 and 3 on Exts.P1 and P6 where the petitioner is making allegations of sound pollution, on account of different events from an Auditorium by name TMK Regency. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, such a complaint has been made, it is for the aforesaid respondents to take cognizance of the complaint and take appropriate action in accordance with law. This, respondents 2 and 3 shall do as expeditiously as possible on the production of a copy of this judgment. 3. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment and writ petition before respondents 2 and 3 for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks