(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12 OF 2005 IN IN IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 51 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 51 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 51 OF 2004 Shri.B.C. Biawas & Ors. ...Applicants Versus Dyanoba Nathu Phuge & Ors. ...Respondents ..... Mr. Babubhai Desai, Additional Solicotor General with Ms. P. H. Kantharia with Mr.S.S.Sarkar, counsel for Applicants Mr. P.B. Shah, counsel for Respondents 1 to 4. Mr. A.H. Palekar, A.G.P. for Respondents 5 & 6. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 1ST APRIL, 2005 DATED: 1ST APRIL, 2005 DATED: 1ST APRIL, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard Mr. Desai, the learned Additional Solicitor General with Ms. Kantharia, the learned advocate for applicants. 2. This is an application for extension of time to deposit the money for the reasons stated therein. The applicants also pray for some clarifications. 3. The judgment of the Division Bench in the case of Dattatraya Dagdu Phuge Vs. The General Manager, Indian Ordinance Factories and Ors. (Writ Petition (-2-) No. 894 of 1996) rendered on 9.11.2000 is clear and no clarifications are required to be given regarding the order passed in Contempt Petition No. 51 of 2004 and ultimately the compensation amount has to be worked out by the respondents on the basis of the said judgment of the Division Bench. 4. The prayer for extension of time deserves consideration and therefore, the application is allowed partly by extending the time to deposit the amount till 30.04.2005 with the Collectorate at Pune. 5. With the above directions the application is disposed off.