srk １ wp-1423-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1423 OF 2010 M/s. Navjeevan Rahivashi SRA Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents Mr. V.Mishra for the petitioner. Mr. J.S.Saluja, Assistant Government Pleader for State-respondent No.1. Mr. G.D. Uttangale for respondent Nos.2 and 3. Mr. S.U. Kamdar, Senior Advocate with Mr. S.G. Surana for respondent No.4. CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. Tuesday, September 28, 2010 P .C. The grievance raised by the petitioner-Co-operative Housing Society is about non allotment of tenements to six of the members whose names have figured in the list of members eligible for rehabilitation in accordance with the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme sanctioned by the authority. 2. The learned counsel for the developer submits that Writ Petition No.2582 of 2009 filed by the concerned six persons has already been disposed of on 1 February 2010 by permitting those petitioners to file suit with respect to the subject matter of the petition for similar reliefs. 3. The learned counsel for SRA places on record a copy of the letter dated 11 February 2010 pointing out that the rehabilitation building is unauthorisedly occupied and the work carried out is not as per the approved srk ２ wp-1423-10 plan. One of the requirements to be complied with by the developer is verification from A.R.S. (SRA) regarding allotment without lottery and action taken report regarding HPC orders for allotment to Navjeevan Cooperative Housing Society. 4. The learned counsel for developer submits that this issue is separate from the grievance posed in this petition. 5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that since the SRA is already looking into the alleged non-implementation of the sanctioned scheme, the grievance posed by the petitioner-society in this petition can also be looked into by the SRA while deciding the issues raised in the letter dated 11 February 2010. 6. This petition is disposed of. The SRA shall look into the grievance posed in this petition in relation to the issues raised in letter dated 11 February 2010. It is clarified that we have not gone into the merits of the controversy or the rival contentions raised in this petition. All issues are kept open. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.