IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2010 / 18TH ASHADHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 467 of 2010(S) -------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.25672/2009 Dated 16/12/2009 .................... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN W.P.(C): ---------------------------------------------- 1. DR.MATHEW V., AGED 43, S/O.V.M.VARGHESE, LECTURER, (SELECTION GRADE), DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH, ST.MICHAEL'S COLLEGE, MAYITHARA MARKET P.O., CHEEPINKAL HOUSE, MAYITHARA P.O., CHERTHALA. 2. ANNIE JOSE K., AGED 46, W/O.K.B.FRANCIS, LECTURER, (SELECTION GRADE), DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY, ST.MICHAEL'S COLLEGE, MAYITHARA MARKET P.O., KURISUNKAL HOUSE, ARTHUNGAL P.O., CHERTHALA. BY ADV. MR.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF RESPONDENT/2nd RESPONDENT IN THE WP(C): --------------------------------------------------------- ANILA GEORGE, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM. ADV. MRS. K.R. DEEPA - GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------------ Contempt Case (C) No.467 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 9th day of July, 2010. J U D G M E N T Alleging violation of the interim order dated 16.12.2009 in W.P.(C) No.25672/2009, this Contempt Case has been filed. This Court had directed the 2nd respondent therein to sanction and disburse salary to the petitioners in the light of Exhibits P1 and P2 within a period of three weeks. It was made clear that if there is any valid objection, the 2nd respondent will file an affidavit in the matter. 2. An affidavit has been filed explaining the entire aspects. The proposal of the Government is to challenge various orders issued by the University by filing a separate writ petition. It is pointed out that writ petition has already been filed which has been admitted also. Therefore, the petitioners will have to seek appropriate C.C(C) No.467/2010 2 reliefs in the writ petition itself. Leaving open the same, this Contempt Case is closed. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp