FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE L.P.A.(ST) NO.5057 OF 2003 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- C.R.Sonawane, AGP for the appellants. Mr M. Sathe, sr.counsel with Mr S.E.Karandikar, for R.No.2. CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. DATED: 14.10.2005 P.C.: Heard the learned AGP and learned counsel for the parties on merits of the Letters Patent Appeal. From the scrutiny of the orders sought to be impugned by the Letters Patent Appeal, it is obvious that it is passed in exercise of the jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution only. An appeal against such decision is not tenable is the settled position in law. Hence, Letters Patent Appeal rejected. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (V.G.PALSHIKAR,J.)