C.W.P. No.2699 of 2009 Gurnam Singh Vs. State of Haryana and others Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. *** The only grouse made by the petitioner is that the recommendations Annexure P-3 and P-4 have not been considered while issuing the letter dated 30.12.2008. Limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the competent authority should consider the recommendations Annexure P-3 and P-4 and then pass a fresh order. I find the prayer to be justified. In the circumstances the respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of the petitioner for retention of service till the age of 60 years and pass a speaking order thereon within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Till then the operation of the letter dated 30.12.2008 will be kept in abeyance. The petition stands disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE February 19, 2009 sunita