1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2877 OF 2009 Mithu Narayan Kulat Versus State of Maharashtra *** Mr. N. V. Gaware, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. D. R. Korde, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** 1. Heard learned counsel for the accused/ applicant. Notice to State. Learned A.P.P. waives service. Papers are available. 2. By order dated 26th August, 2009, interim protection was extended in favour of the accused/ applicant to be released on bail in the event of arrest, by furnishing P.R.Board and surety of Rs.10,000/- and attendance to police station, which has been scrupulously adhered to. 3. On going through the investigation papers, I find, though the witness rather complainant indicate role of the accused/ applicant, nothing is to be recovered from him. The accused/ applicant allegedly impersonated for Sunjay Thombre and 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. received the amount from the complainant. Some recovery is made from one Nitin Pandharinath Vetal, still the prosecution claims amount is to be recovered. The mobile sim-card is not in the name of accused/ applicant. In the situation, custodial interrogation of the accused/ applicant not required. His role can be investigated by causing his interrogation at police station. Hence, the earlier protection is extended till filing of the charge sheet. 4. The applicant herein shall adhere to the conditions of attendance on every alternate day between 10.00 a.m. to 03.00 p.m. till filing of the charge sheet. Application is allowed in above terms. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:07/09/2009. ans/2877