HIGE COURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BTLASPUR ‘NRH‘ PETKTIGN (S) N0. 228 0f2$68 PETITIGNER : Rajkumari Suryavansi, D/o Shyi DharamiaL ducu abOut 4% yéals Enimum Kdlmi {Removed} Govt Higher Secondary Schooi Kudurmai Dim Korba R/o Vxllage ~ M1lom Vxa. — Pamgarh, Dlstt Janjgir-Champa C G VERSUS ‘RESPOWENTS :1. State of Ch‘mttisgarh, ihrough Secretaxy, Panchayat and Rural Deparimant, D.K.S‘ Bhawan, Raiyur CG. District Coiiectm‘, Dim. Kurba {3.6. Chief Executive OiTlcer Jangjad ¥anchayag Ixmba Disti Karim C G WRI F PE 1 Y1 ION UhDER ARri JCL]: 2Z6 0% 1 Hb CONS T1 fUl IGN OF lNBlA $3, Huii’hie hm Satish K Agimmti‘iLa. w:w Pz‘eseni: Shm M Lé Baeg Advocate for the yetitioner 31m Ammo was Panel Lawyer f0? tho Siam respgmdeim 1 & L ORAL 0RDER {Passed on 215‘ oay of Apr£1, 2W8) With the consent of the pan‘ies, the matter is taken up for hearing h1na31y. LA. N022; mm is an applioation for mkjrxg (iocument on record._ The ayoiicatioa is ordered as prayed for. . The petitioner was apyoirtted as Shiksha Karmi Gracie HI on 15.i1~2€)07 (Amexure PM) at Government Higher Secondary Schoo}, Gotihi. Ail of a sudden, Without aifording any opportunity of hearing the appointment of the petitioner was cancelled on 13.03.2008 (Annexure I’ll) by the Chief Execixtive Oiiicet, Jampad Pamehayatg Korba, on the ground thar *t’he experierice certificate erodueedi by the petitioner wee false. )b) Leamed ceunsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in this petition is squarely eovered by the judgnent and order dated 14m March, 2008 passed by this Couxt in WP. (S) No. 95/2608 (K11. Punam 8L Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) anti other comected matters. . Shri Des: teameel Panei Lawyer appearii‘ig for the State/respomients submits that the issue raised herein has aiready been conciuded by the decision in the case of Putnam (meta). 4. Thus, this petition is aeeordingly {lisposed of in the same terms that the petitioner be attorded an opportunity of hearing to establish genuineness of the eertificate produced by her before passing an order of termination. The impugned order dated 31.03.2008 tAnnexure P/l) is accordingly quashed. No order asto c‘)sts. sw- Satish K. Agnihotri i Judge / /