IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39134 of 2009 1. Dilip Kumar Yadav @ Dilip Yadav, son of Jagdish Yadav, 2. Bhikhari Yadav @ Bhikari Yadav, son of Shrideo Yadav, both of village Meghaul, Ps Sakari, District Madhubani – petitioner. Vs. The State of Bihar. 2 24.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case under sections341, 323, 324, 452, 435/34 of the Penal Code. There is a case and counter case. There is allegation that Dilip Kumar Yadav assaulted with a Farsa causing injury on the little finger and set fire the cattle shed. From the order of the court below it appears that the injury is grievous in nature. Considering the aforesaid aspect I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to Dilip Kumar Yadav, petitioner no.1. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. So far as petitioner no.2 Bhikhari Yadav @ Bhikari Yadav is concerned, there is omnibus allegation against him. Considering this aspect petitioner no. 2 is directed to released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender within six weeks, in Sakari PS Case No. 47/2009 on furnishing bail bond of rupees ten thousand with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)