Civil Revision No.6060 of 2010 -: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6060 of 2010 Date of decision: September 21, 2010. Neeraj Sharma ...Petitioner(s) v. Budh Ram ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Shri Satinder Khanna, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia , J. (Oral): In the present petition, order dated 31.8.2010 passed by the Rent Controller, Ludhiana has been assailed whereby he determined provisionally rent at the rate of Rs.7150/- per month from May 2009 to August 2010 with interest @ 6% per annum and cost sof Rs.1,000/-. Counsel submitted that rent was always received at the rate of Rs.6000/- per month qua the demised property. The Rent Controller has taken into consideration the rent note and determined the rent @ Rs.7150/-. The order assessing the provisional rent is interim in nature. The parties shall adduce their evidence for determination of the quantum of rent and qua relationship of landlord and tenant. In case, in consonance with the impugned order, whereby provisional rent was assessed, payment is made and the same later is found Civil Revision No.6060 of 2010 -: 2 :- to be paid in excess by tenant, the same shall be adjusted later on. At the first instance, the tenant should pay the amount as assessed by the Rent Controller. He is also at liberty to apply for refund of the said amount which he believes has been paid in excess. However, there is no justification to vary the interim order passed by the Rent Controller. With these observations, the present petition is disposed of. [Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia] September 21, 2010. Judge kadyan