IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (DHCLSC) CONTINUOUS LOK ADALAT — 11 ROOM NO. 18 10 25.03.2009 Present: Mr.K.G. Seth, Advoca4 for the Appellant alongwith appellant in person. Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv!ocate for the Respon ' dent alongwith Mr. J.K. Nagpal, Manager, New India Assurance Company. MAC. APP. 641/2007 10 After discussion, learned counsel for the parties agreed that the impugned award be enhanced by a sum of Rs. 50,000/- in full and final satisfaction of all the claims of the claimant. Let the statement of the claimant as well as Insurance Company be recorded by the Secretary, Delhi High Court Legal. Services Committee and the file be placed before the Hon'ble Court for further order in regard to the modification of the award, disposal of the appeal and the release of the amount. 65 Hon'ble Mr. justice R.C. Chopra (Retd.) Deepali Gupta JUDGES LOK ADALAT March 25,2009 6rs9 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (DHCLSC) CONTINUOUS LOK ADALAT — 11 ROOM NO. 18 10 ~ 1 25.03.2009 Present: Mr. K.G. Seth, Advocate for the Appellant along with Appellant. Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate and Mr. J.K. Nagpal, Manager for the Respondent NIA. MAC.APP. 641/2007 Statement of Mr. J.K. Nagpal, Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited. On SA The respondent NIA has agreed to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- in full and final settlement of the claim made by the appellant. The Respondent NIA shall deposit the settlement amount with the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee within 30 days of the receipt of the certified copy of the withdrawal order of the present appeal which may be released to the appellant. R 0 Statement of Mr. K.G. Seth, Advocate for the appellant. Without Oath On the instructions of the appellant, I accept the offer of Rs.50,.000/- made by the respondent NIA, in full and final settlement of the present appeal/proceedings. In terms of the offer made by the respondent, the award may kindly be passed and appeal may be disposed of accordingly. RWC Si re U 33 *IN THE HIGH- COURT OF DELHI AT NE,W DELHI + MAC.APP. 641/2007 DARSHANA RANI ..... Appellant Through Mr. K.G. Seth, Adv. versus DINKAR SAXENA & ANR ..... Respondents Through : None. CORAM: HON-BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA 0 R D E R % 12.05.2009 1.~ The appellant is present in person. She was directed to remain present because the learned counsel for the appellant had made a request that the enhanced amount of Rs.50,000/- be directed to be released to the appellant without restriction of fixed deposit. . I -have examined the appellant who submits that she has to undergo an eye surgery for which expenditure of Rs.17,000/- is expected to be incurred. The appellant is also unable to walk without the support of iron cage. , Considering the condition of the appellant, the learned Tribunal is directed that upon deposit of the enhanced amount, the same be released to the appellant without the restriction of MACAPP. 641/2007 page 1 of 2 the fixed deposit. 4. Copy of this order be given 'Dasti' to learned counsel for the appellant under signatures of the Court Master. I i N J.R. MIDHA, j MAY 12, 2009 aj page 2 of 2