7.wp.699.09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.699 OF 2009 Rashtrawadi Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Union. ..Petitioner. Versus Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane District, & 2 others. ..Respondents. ... None for the petitioner. Mrs.Lata Desai, Advocate i/b. Pallavi Divekar, Advocate for respondent No.1. ... CORAM : F. I. REBELLO & A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 15, 2010. P.C. 1. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The petitioner approached this Court contending that the members whose names are listed at Exhibit-A should be registered with respondent No.1. Appearance is put on behalf of the respondent No.1. The learned Counsel states that it requires six months time to consider the 7.wp.699.09 2 applications made by the petitioner for registration. 3. Considering the above, this Petition can be disposed of by directing respondent No.1 to consider the applications filed by the petitioner on behalf of their members. Respondent No.1 is directed to consider the applications made by the petitioner on behalf of their members as expeditiously as possible and at any rate not later than eight months from today. Rule is made absolute accordingly. Petition is disposed of. (A.R. JOSHI, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)