IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT No. 1995 of 1988 The Board of Trustees of Port of Bombay .. Plaintiff versus Barnala Electronics Pvt.Ltd. .. Defendant ... Mr.U.J.Makhija i/b Mulla & Mulla for the plaintiff. Mr.Raju Gawde i/b K.ashar & Co. for defendant. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 22nd June 2006. DATED : 22nd June 2006. DATED : 22nd June 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The Counsel for the plaintiff points out that the defendant has not filed written statement though served several years ago. Counsel therefore prays for a decree under Order 8 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Suit is only for recovery of money. In the absence of written statement, the averments made in the plaint are deemed to be admitted. 3. Suit of the plaintiff is decreed under Order 8 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure in terms of prayer clause (a). (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J)