Govt. Appeal (SJ) No. 9 OF 1995 In the matter of an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. ************ THE STATE OF BIHAR ……(Appellant) Versus 1. Bakhouri Singh. 2. Vijendra Singh. 3. Vijay Singh, Sons of Late Balgovind Singh. 4. Devendra Singh. 5. Budhu Singh. Sons of Sri Bali Katori Singh @ Balogovind Singh. 6. Braj Kishore Singh. 7. Raj Kishore Singh, Sons of Bhurwin Singh. 8. Suresh Singh. 9. Ravindra Singh. Both Sons of Late Sumera Singh. 10. Baldeo Singh, S/o Late Raghuni Singh. 11. Ballam Singh, S/o Late Sohan Singh. 12. Chandrika Singh, S/o Sri Jaga Singh. All R/o Village-Sheo Chak, Police Station- Fatuha, District-Patna (Accused Persons). ……Respondents. ************* For the Appellant : Mr. S. Dayal, APP. For the Respondents : Mr. A.K. Sinha, Adv. ************** P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH Anjana Prakash, J. 1. The appellant is aggrieved with the judgment dated 07.09.1994 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Patna in S.Tr. No. 56 of 1992 by which it has acquitted the Respondents No. 1 to 12 for the charges framed under Section 307/149 IPC. 2. On going through the judgment of acquittal I find that the Trial Court has rightly given the benefit of doubt to the appellants and, therefore, it is difficult to disagree with the reasonings of the Trial Court. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. (Anjana Prakash, J.) Patna High Court, Patna, Dated, the 2nd May, 2011. NAFR/Vikash/-