IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.582 of 2010 SUNIL KUMAR SINGH SUNIL KUMAR SINGH SON OF LATE HARINANDAN SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- JIGANA, P.S. AGARER, DISTRICT- ROHTAS. . Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL-CUM-INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, SAHABAD RANGE ROHTAS AT DEHRI-ON-SONE, BIHAR. 4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 5. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 6. THE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, NEW DELHI. 7. THE HOME SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIOHAR, PANTA. ----------- 2 21.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that Sasaram (M) P.S. Case no.395 of 2009 is not being properly investigated. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State stating therein to the effect that the investigation of the case is properly done and the necessary instructions are being issued by the concerned D.I.G of Police. As such the allegation of the petitioner that investigation is not properly done is not correct. Considering the submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter. However, it goes without saying that the investigation of the case be carried out expeditiously without unnecessary delay. The writ application stands disposed of. Amrendra/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)