IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45884 of 2009 1. GAURI SHANKER PRASAD 2. SHAKUNTALA DEVI ---------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 16.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the complainant. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is every allegation of demand of dowry, causing of cruelty and lastly administering poison but that cannot be believed because of the reason that allegedly poison was administered after assault forcibly but no injury was found while she was admitted to Hospital rather it was the husband who took the deceased to Hospital, informed the complainant though that is not admitted rather it is said that she was informed on Mobile by some one but admittedly she appeared in the Hospital and it is submitted on behalf of petitioners that a U.D.Case was filed on her behalf mentioning no demand, no torture, no administration of poison. Annexure-2 is Photostat copy of U.D.Case bearing signature of the deceased’ father and uncle and Annexure-3 is Photostat copy of postmortem report in which no 2 injury internal or external was found on the dead body. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah in Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 337/2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)