IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL C-482 No. 791 OF 2010 Sushil Kumar Raghuwanshi ….…Applicant. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ……...Respondents. Present: Mr. Kurban Ali, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Nandan Arya, AGA for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent nos. 1 to 3. Date of Decision : 20.8.2010 Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) 1. Heard Mr. Kurban Ali, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Nandan Arya, AGA for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent nos. 1 to 3. 2. By means of this application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., the applicant has challenged the summoning order dated 17.6.2010, which has been issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kotdwar, District Pauri to the applicant on a complaint made by respondent no. 3 under Section 500 I.P.C., which has been registered as Criminal Complaint No. 278 of 2010 Sri Amar Singh Vs. Sushil Kumar Raghuwanshi. In short the complaint is that the applicant is repeatedly trying to defame the complainant/respondent no. 3 by stating that he deals in drugs and liquor and is indulged in gambling, etc. 3. Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate has examined the complaint of the complainant/respondent no. 3 in some detail and after going through the due process and after examining the entire aspect of the matter and proceeding under Sections 200 and 202 of Cr.P.C. has issued summons to the applicant. There is absolutely no infirmity in the summoning order dated 17.6.2010. Consequently, there is no scope for this Court to interfere under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The instant C-482 application is without merit and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 20.8.2010 Rathour