IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP No —————(—8§—l—of2006 3W g WW1 PETITIONER : Deepesh Kumar chakraborty son of Late Shrl N Chakraborty, / aged about 39 years, Resident of Plot No. 82, House No. 882, Kailash - Nagar, Durg, (C.G.). VERSUS %%r t RESPONDENT: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE‘ b CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS ORDER OR ORDERS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. C ‘ H K Secretary,Cooperative Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) O§§ 2 The Registrar Cooperative Societies 9b / Near Tellbandha Pohce Statlon (By x’Y ¢h$§g Y1 $ Pass Junction) Ralpur / (ff: \1 o»%@ $ V 8b: 3. Deputy/ Joint Registrar, Cooperative w Societies, Blinkar Sangh, Station ovw” Road, Durg, (C.G.) “g, 4. Assistant Registrar, Cooperative v” Societies, Blinkar Sangh, Station Road, Durg, (C.G.) 5. Managing Director Bhilai Nagrik 1/ Sahkari Bank Mydt., Akanksha Building, Sector -6, Bhilai, (C.G.) W. P. No. 1802/2006 Pefi‘fioner : Vivek Dharmadhikari Versus Respondenfs : Smfe of Chhcm'isgnrh, d: omers W. P. No. 1803/2006 . Pefi'rioner _ : Smf. P'admini Shandey Versus Respondenfs : Sfafe of Chhaf'risgarh & o‘rher's W. P. No. 1804/2006 Versus Responden'rs 2 Sfafe of». Chhaffisgarh & others W. P. Na 1805/2006 Pe‘rifioner : . Rekha Dehlkur Rx Versus Respondenfs : Sfafe of Chhaffisgarh & ofhers W. P. No. 1806/2006 Pefifioner : Sm‘r. Sheela B. Rajah Versus Responden'rs : Sfufe of Chha'rfisgarh & ofher's W. P. No. 1822/2006 ' Pefifioner : Dauwa Rum Versus Respondenfs : Sfafe of Chhaffisgarh & omers HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Pe'rifioner i Smf. Sarah Sukk: Pefifioner Responden‘rs W. P. No. 1823/2006 _ Ram Nafh Singh Versus Smfe of Chhaf‘fisgarh & 01'hers W. P No. 1824/2006 Pe'rifioner \/ 1 Versus Responden'rs W. P. No. 1825/2006 Pefi‘rioner- Versus Respondenfs W. P. No. 1826/2006 Pe'fi'fioner Versus Responden'rs W. P. No. 1827/2006 Rnnjif Singh Versus Petitioner Respondents W. P. No 1828/2006 Pefi'fioner Versus Responden‘fs Chandra Bhushan Sharma S‘m‘l'e of Chha‘r‘risgarh & ofhers Vipin Bihari Mishm Sfa‘re of Chhaffisgurh & ofhers Ashok Kumar Upadhyayu‘ r Sfafe of Chha‘hisgcrh & others Sfafe of Chhaffisgarh <& ofhers Ku. Madhuri Gosai 'Sfafe of Chhaffisgarh & ofhers q '5\ W. P. No. 1829/2006 Pefi‘rioner Ghunshyam Suhu Versus Sfafe of Chha'rfisgarh & ofhers Responden-rs W. P. No. 1830/2006 Pefi'fioner i Sunkalp Vadnv Versus Responden'rs 1 Smfe of Chha‘rfisgarh & ofhers W. P. No. 1853/2006 Pe‘rifioner' Madhuri Dewangan Versus Respondenfs : Sfufe of hhamsgurh & others C W. P. Na. 1858/2006 Pe'ri'rioner : Sm‘r. Rajshree J'ha Versus RespondeMs '. v 5mm of Chhaffisgnrh & others Pefi'fioner Mahendra Kumar Awadhiya Versus S‘m‘re of Chha‘r‘risgarh & ofhers Respondenfs W . P. Np. 1860/2006 Pefifioner L. Govind Rau j Versus S‘m‘fe of Chhaffisgnrh & ofhers Respondents \ Pefifioner Yushwan‘!’ KUmar Uike Versus Respondenfs : Sfafe of Chha‘Hisgurh & ofhers W. P. No. 1862/2006 Pefifioner : Deepesh Kumar Chakraborfy t Versus Respondenfs : 5+a1'e 6f Chhaffisgarh & o‘rhers \ \ ¥ ~ $8: Hon'bleMr. Jusfice Safish K. Agnihofri, .T Shri R.K. Jaiswal, Advocafe for The pdifioners. Shri V.V.5. Moor‘rhy, Depufy Advocufe General for The S'I'c're. Shri Amiyakanf Tiwari, Advocafe for fhe responden‘r No. 5. ORDER (11* 5ep+ember, zooay The following order of fhe Courf is passed by Safish K. Agnihofri, J. . This baT/ch of maTTers involving commoh quesTion of facTs and common quesfian of law, fhus, These peti'lions are being disposed of by This common order. . The peTiTioners have filed a brief'wriT peTiTions dehors The maferial facTs involved in The case. The peTiTioners in all peTiTions in‘ para-1 have menTioned fncfs To The exTenT ThaT The manegemen‘r of The socieTy. has decided To reduce The financial expendiTure of The esTablishmenT of The Bank wiThouT giving any deTails of The facTs. Even oTherwise no case has been made ouT for enTerTaining These peTiTions under The wriT jurisdicTion. However, iT was poinTed ouT ThaT equally effecTive, efficacious alTernaTive remedy by way of filing an M 7/ e (l @ upped before fhe Regisfr-ar,Co-opera+ive Sociefies as provided under Secfion 55 of fhe Co-opera'rive Societies Acf 1960 (for shor‘f 'The Ad, 1960) is available +0 The pe‘fifioner-s. Secfion 55 (1) & (2) reads as under- :- "55. Regisfrar's power +0 defermine condifions of employmenf in sociefies: (1) The Regis‘rmr may, from fime 1'0 fime, frame rules governing ‘H’ie Terms and condi‘rions of employmen'r in a socie‘iy or class of sociefies and fhe sociefy or class of sociefies To which such ‘l'erms and condifions of employmen‘i are applicable shall comply wifh fhe order fha‘i may be issued by fhe Registrar in fhis behalf. (2) Where a dispu'i'e, including a dispufe regarding ferms of employmen‘i working condifions and disciplinary ac‘i'ion ‘iaken by a socie‘ry, arises befween a sociefy and ifs employees, The RegisTrar or any officer appoinTed by him noT below The rank of AssisTanT RegisTrar shall 'decide The dispu‘l’e and his decision shall be binding on The socieTy and iTs employees. Provided ThaT The RegisTrar or The officer referred To above shall noT enTerTain The dispuTe unless presenTed To him wiThin ThirTy days from The daTe of order soughT To be impugned: Provided furTher ThaT in compuTing The period of limiTaTion under The foregoing proviso, The Time requisiTe for obTaining copy of The order shall be excluded." l 3. The peTiTioners have noT availed The alTernaTive remedy, which appears To be effecTive, efficacious and The appellaTe auThoriTy is compeTenT To go in deTail abouT The facTs. 4. Learned counsel appearing for The peTiTioners seeks liberTy of This CourT To wiThdraw These peTiTions and To move appropriaTe alTernaTive forum uvailable ‘ro Them for redressal of grievances of The pefifioners. 5. Accordingly,fhe pefifions are dismissed as wifhdmwn wi-rh fhe above sfa'red liberfy. No order as f0 cos-rs. 6. A copy of fhis order be placed on record of o1+1er nine'reen connected wri‘f pefifions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge r