IN THE HIGH-COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No; PETITIONER 5o.^-o^ .rf ^s^- ^-^•:^' '' ..-" ...^••:v ^» A .v-?' RESPONDENTS 1. c-' ^•..^0'--"---^1^, i-'^ U ^: 4.-' R. R. Dlinw,, S/oShriJ. R. Dhruv, aged about 52 years, Occupation- Assistant Teacher, BalakAshram Dhoota Khar, Vikas Khand Orcha, Tahsfl- Narayanpur, District- Baster (C.G.). Versus- State of Chhattisgarh, Through fhe Secretary, Adim. Jati Tatha Aniisiichit Jati Vikas Vibhag, Mautralaya, Dau Kalyau. Singh Bhawaa, Shastri Chowk, Eaipur (C.G.). The Director, Aclim Jati Tatha Aausuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, Raipur (C.G.). The CoUector (Adivasbi Vikas Shalcha), Jagdalpur (C.G.). The Assistaiit Director, Adiai Jati Tatha Atiuauchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, CoHectorate Building, Jagdalpur (Baster) (C.G.J. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE COI^TITUTION OFLJHDIA POR ISSUANCE OP A WRIT IN THE NATURE QF MA.NDAMUS. PROHIBmON. CERTIORARI ETC.OR ANY OTHEE_ DISECTION OR OEDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. ^3'5ET'-^l^|rt^,u>-ri1'<-l<lco,Ri<?)i<!-iy<( . u'p- r30- 3070 NiHrii apm^ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••- Sn^91^ (liclij<l<d) ^200y an^STiRlR'li'b (raTsn^STiRHra; ^ S^IIW^{feT3n^ST jThis is aa appUcation for urgent hearuig. Application is alloweijt Panddv pra^-ed Heard Shri Vinay and Shri Pankaj Shrivasta^ adyance copy. The petitioner has relieve him iminediately to 18.10,2004 (Amiexure P-1). petitiouer who is workihg oa Ashram, Dhoorakhar, Bloclj Bastar (C.G) has been Shikaripara, Distt. Kaaker. issued on 18.10.2004 but the| It is also stated by leamed c^inply tlie trajisftrred Tbou petitioner has subinitted evev )>>-- s.nnexure P-2). but fhereaftdr L-~~ ———-[-^ relieviag him.. Ithas been sp| petitiou that fhe aforesaid ord( so far. Considering fhe facts add opuiion of fhis court, fhis peti( conditional onler. It is herel|>y order has not been caacelledl petitioner has not heen reMev^d <p[^[cs<TlTl *tl*frtT^ff^^ tfu^-cit ^e 3fR)i SII^EOT : r, leamed counsel for the petitioner , P.L. for the State/respondents on for issuance of a direction to with the transfer order dated py the said order dt. 18.10.2004 tfae l|ie post ofAssistant Teacher in Balak Orcha, TahsU Narayanpur, Distt. to Priiuaiy School, Geetaphar, ih the order of traasfer has been same has not been coinplied so far. ^•ounsel for fhe petitioner fhat fhe representation dated 08.2.2005 jr, the concenied aufhority is not •ci&caUy stated vide Para 5.7 of the •r of traasfer has not been canceUed circuinstances of this case, ia the (ion caa be disposed ofby passiag a directed fhat if the said traasfer or vaned ia any inanner aad the so far, the concemed authority of XI-HC-78 3^9T«Wtrt«,t»Tn<M''lfi,firtl'«y<< (^i .f roo. s °n ° WTeCT^W^ 3IT^?Tt p (^clijd^) W^200^" aiiiniRiRi'liit) craTai^ST3)irt<i> K*° BWT8R^lfScI.ni^9T fhe Stafe shatl relieve fhe petiti|o fhe date of receipt/productioi^ said authority. It is inade clear that if varied ia aay niaruier this ol'de^" Accorduigly, tliis petitioi^ C.C. as per rules. |oner wifhin a period of 15 days of a copy of this order before the order of transfer is canceUed or jr shaU have no force. stands finally disposed of. <ni<ifo9<ili<ii*inV^'fal<II'(Ril+^l'( ^gif^ftran^?! Sd/- Suni] Kumar Sinha Judge