IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36053 of 2009 MUKESH YADAV S/O DEGAN YADAV VILL-SULTANPUR, BIND TOLI, P.S- MOKAMA, DISTT- PATNA …… PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 02. 09.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is a named accused and charged under Section307/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with 27 of the Arms Act in Mokama P.S. Case No. 140 of 2008. Counsel for the petitioner submits that though there is specific allegation that he fired and caused bullet injury on the palm of the inform, the injury report does not support that there is any injury on the palm of the informant. But there is no doubt that there is other bullet injury on the person of the informant. Submission of the counsel is that obviously the present petitioner has been falsely implicated for other reasons. The informant himself has a kind of outlay in many cases against him. Petitioner has been in custody since 07.01.2009 and he may be given benefit of doubt. In the totality of the matter, let the petitioner namely Mukesh Yadav be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/-(twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional 2 Sessions Judge IIIrd, Barh in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No. 140 of 2008(S.Tr. No. 604 of 2009). One of the sureties will be executed by the father of the petitioner on due identification by the Court below. Petitioner is directed to co-operate in the trial by appearing in the Court either through himself or through his counsel. Shageer (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)