IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1652 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1651 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant Vs. 1. Sachin Dhaku Kanade and ors. .. Respondents Mr. A.S. Shitole, APP for Applicant. Mr. Neville Deboo for Respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.S. PARKAR & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. S.S. PARKAR & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. S.S. PARKAR & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. Date Date Date : September 21, 2005. : September 21, 2005. : September 21, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard. As usual the office of the Public Prosecutor, High Court, Bombay is responsible for causing delay in filing the application for leave to file an appeal. In view of the fact that though there is evidence of the injured and the eye witness, the accused have been acquitted, we are inclined to condone the delay in order to see that no injustice is caused to the victim because of the delay caused by the office of the Public Prosecutor, High Court, Bombay. . We, therefore, allow this application in public interest on payment of costs of Rs.1000/- to the respondents within four weeks. (S.S. (S.S. (S.S. Parkar,J.) Parkar,J.) Parkar,J.) (Anoop (Anoop (Anoop V. Mohta,J.) V. Mohta,J.) V. Mohta,J.)