1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3529 OF 2010 (Pandurang M. Shinde & Ors. vs. Ganesh N. Sahadare & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. AUGUST 16, 2010. Shri Chandurkar, learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners are added as defendants subsequently and hence they have filed written statement raising several defences. In the light of said written statement, additional issues were sought for by moving application under Order 14, Rules 2 & 5 of Civil Procedure Code and that application has been partly allowed by the impugned order. He has placed reliance upon the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Ajit Gaitonde vs. Ezilda Emiliana Cristina Pinto, reported at 2009 (3) ALL MR 838, to urge that when disputed questions arise, the Court has to frame appropriate issues. With his assistance, I have perused impugned order passed below Exh. 145 on 25.03.2010. The trial Court has applied its mind issue-wise. I find that issues No. A, B and C as sought for in this writ petition are already covered by issues as framed by the trial Court. 2 No prejudice is, therefore, caused to the petitioners in the matter. Writ Petition is, therefore, rejected. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.