IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 899 of 2008 With Stay Application No. 7565/2008 Jaibeer & others. ......... Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. ......... Respondents Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. On due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; the contents of the F.I.R; the averments made in the F.I.R. against the present petitioners; the fact that a report has been lodged u/s 147, 148, 452, 323, 504, 506, 506, 427 & 379 IPC at the police station; the fact that the supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioners reveals that the informant as well as her husband has received the injuries on their persons on the date of the incident and this corroborates the incident; the fact that the complainant and her husband were apprehended by the police u/s 106 & 117 of Cr.P.C; and in the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any good ground to grant relief to the petitioners as claimed in the petition. 4. I am refraining from commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioners’ case at the trial which is yet to start. However, it is made clear that if the petitioners are arrested or surrender before the court concerned, their bail applications shall be disposed of expeditiously. 5. In view of above, the petition and the relief sought in this petition are liable to be dismissed and are hereby dismissed summarily. Consequently, the stay application is also dismissed. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 01.12.2008 V.K