IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13468 of 2009 DR.SUSHIL KUMAR JHA & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS With CWJC No.16572 of 2009 SURENDRA KANT JHA & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.16529 of 2009 SHANKAR PRASAD SHARMA & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS With CWJC No.16782 of 2009 RAJ BALLABH PRASAD SINGH & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS With CWJC No.248 of 2010 DR.SHANTI KUMARI VERMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.15155 of 2009 DIP NARAYAN GUPTA & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS With CWJC No.2283 of 2010 MUNNA PRASAD GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS With CWJC No.2079 of 2010 ARUN KUMAR & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS With CWJC No.1704 of 2010 DEVENDRA PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS With CWJC No.1374 of 2010 BIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS With CWJC No.16229 of 2009 2 SHASHI BHUSHAN PRASAD SINGH & Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS With CWJC No.3318 of 2010 ARUN KUMAR SINGH & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS With CWJC No.11685 of 2010 HEERA PANDEYA & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS With CWJC No.9979 of 2010 ASHOK KUMAR SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS With CWJC No.3359 of 2010 PRABHURANJAN PRASAD SINGH &ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS With CWJC No.5370 of 2010 SATYA PRAKASH DAYAL & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS With CWJC No.5445 of 2010 AJAY PRASAD LAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS With CWJC No.16495 of 2009 PROF.AJIT KUMAR SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5 21.02.2011 As the issue arising in a large number of pending writ applications already stood decided by an order of a Bench of this Court, this Court took up similar matters covered by the said order and 3 disposed them of by order dated 01.10.2010. The first case of the batch was CWJC No. 13468 of 2009. The other identical matters were of disposed of by the said common order passed on that day. However, due to mistake in the office, another matter bearing CWJC No.16495 of 2009 was also tagged with the batch in the order typed on that day and thus, was shown to have been disposed of. Later on, it transpired that the matter in the said writ application was quite different than the matter in the batch of writ applications which were disposed of, and, therefore, the same required independent hearing. In the circumstances, it is observed that the order dated 01.10.2010 passed in CWJC No. 13468 of 2009 and other analogous cases shall not be treated to have been passed in CWJC No.16495 of 2009 and the said order stands modified to that extent. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)