wj 9p HIGH COURT 014 CHI-1 ATTISGARH A1 BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) (PR) No 3253 of2009 “WC gloé/d3 , PETITIONERS 4 1 Kum Mamsha Bamare D/o Shn T R Banjam " " ‘ ‘ “ Aged about 24 ycars RO Teachew Colony, K‘ ‘ "575'X ‘ , Jyotimpur Pendra Road PO B1laspur Dist, CG State ‘ g 2. BaldevPrasad Som, s/o Shn Ram Vishal 30m, aged about ‘3 years R10 Amadam (Vii! >& P O ) Pendra Road Bllaspur Dist CG State J VERSUS I RESPONBENTS : 1. State (ECG, Thru: Secretary State Board 0f ; ‘ ‘ w ' '“ ‘ EmmxatiOngDKS Bhawan, Raipur CG State. * ; 2’ Principa1 Govt m Pendxa Bilaspur Dist CG ‘ ’ State ‘ wmT pm 1 HON UNDER Alma}, 226 OF m}; CONsmUI‘ION OF INDIA l SB~ Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agmlmtri J ‘7 PréSem: 'Nkne S t i Arvirid for the Dubey, petitioners. Pam] Lawyer for the State. ‘ . 7 ORDERgoRAL) i ! (Passed on 03’ dayof September,2009) 1 J . 1. . The case was listed before the Additional Registrar (Judicial) on 1.7.2009 for default i 0n the said date none appeared on behalf of the oetitoiner. l Thereaiter the matter was again listed before the Addmonal Registrar (Judimal‘ on 8““ August, 2009 On the said date the counsel for the petitioners prayed for two weeks tune to remove the default However, even alter lapse of ’ two'weeks the default could not be removed. Thus, the casehas beenlisted todav before this Court for orders on default . 2. C, r The matter 1s called for hearmg twroe None appears nor any representation is g made o'n behalf of the petitioners. The petitioners may not be interested 1n z r 1 m pursuing the matter 3. i I . In View ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for default and non-prosecution ’ Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNIHOTRI Judge J [