In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … RSA No. 3519 of 1985 Date of decision: December 2, 2010 Jit Singh ..Appellant. Versus Harbans Singh and others ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: None for the appellant. Mr. F.S.Virk, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4 Mr. Vishal Goel, Advocate for respondent Nos.9 and 10 ... Rakesh Kumar Garg,J.(Oral) This is plaintiff's second appeal challenging the judgments and decrees of the courts below whereby his suit ,for declaration to the effect that he was owner in possession of the suit land on the basis of sale deed dat ed 27.5.1957 executed by Inder Singh son of Ishar Singh and in the alternative, that they have become owners in possession by way of adverse possession, was dismissed. On the basis of evidence on record, both the courts below have recorded a finding that plaintiff-appellant has failed to prove his case on the basis of both the aforesaid pleas and in fact a finding has been recorded that mainly suit of the plaintiff-appellant was based upon the plea of adverse possession. This court in Bhim Singh and others Versus Zile Singh and others 2006(3) RCR Civil 97 has authoritatively laid down that suit for declaration of title on the plea of adverse possession is not maintainable. No one is present on behalf of the appellant. Even actual date notice was sent to the appellant through registered A.D. Post, the same has not come back served or otherwise. It seems that the appellant is not interested in pursuing this appeal. Dismissed for non-prosecution. December 2, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE