IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. LPA No. 75 of 2011. Decided on: 6.7.2011. __________________________________________________________ H.P.S.E.B. … Appellant. Versus Shri Mohinder Singh & others. … Respondents. __________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the appellant : Mr. Trilok Jamwal, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1. ___________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral). The appellant was the respondent in the writ petition. The writ petitioners approached this Court praying for retrospective promotion. The writ petition was allowed and hence, the appeal. 2. On 18.6.2011, this Court passed the following order:- “It is seen from the available records that grading of the writ petitioner during the DPC, held in respect of the vacancies of 1989-90 was very good and at that time, there were five vacancies. But only three vacancies were filled up. Therefore, it is the contention of the private respondent that as and when his sealed cover was opened, he should have been accommodated in respect of the vacancy for which he was considered, as he was cleared in the departmental proceedings. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks time to get further instruction.” 3. The learned counsel for the Board, on instructions from the appellant, submits that there has been some discrepancy. The case of the contesting respondent requires reconsideration in terms of the judgment of the learned Single Judge. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, so also pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. (Justice V.K. Sharma) July 6, 2011. Judge. (cr/virender) 2