-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTEMPT CONTEMPT CONTEMPT PETITION NO. PETITION NO. PETITION NO.35 OF 2005 OF 2005 OF 2005 ............................................................. ............................................................. ............................................................. Office Notes,Office Office Notes,Office Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, memorandum of Coram, memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s appearances,Court’s appearances,Court’s Court’s Court’s Court’s or or or orders or directions orders or directions orders or directions Judge’s Judge’s Judge’s orders orders orders & Registrar’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. ............................................................. ............................................................. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 28,2007. : JUNE 28,2007. : JUNE 28,2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. On 22nd June 2006, none appeared for the Petitioner. Today, when the Petition was called out, none appears for the Petitioner. The breach alleged is of following part of the order dated 5th August 1999 passed by this Court : ." Petitioners to pay US Dollars 1273.58 as arrears of wages and US Dollars 1500 as damages and also pay interest at the rate of 6% p.a. from the date of application till full payment together with costs of Rs.6000/- to Respondent No.1." 2. There is a reply filed by the second Respondent-contemnor. In the said reply details of the amounts paid to the -2- Petitioner have been set out. It is stated in the reply that the amount deposited by the contemnor in the Court is adequate. In paragraph 16, it is stated that if computation of the amount payable by the Petitioner is made and it is shown that the some more amount is payable than what has been deposited, the Contemnor will deposit the balance amount. 3. In view of the Affidavit in reply, no case is made out for taking any further action under the Contempt of Courts Act,1971. If there is a shortfall in the amount paid by the contemnor, the Petitioner is free to take out appropriate proceedings on the basis of the order dated 5th August 2007. 4. Subject to what is stated above, Contempt Notice is discharged. Petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE