IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 27343 of 2007 Between: 1 Mohammed Ali S/o. Late Mohd.Yousuf Ali R/o.Bahadurpally village, Quthbullapur Mandal Ranga Reddy District, rep.by his GPA Holder Mohd.Nizamuddin ie. 2nd petitioner 2 Mohd.Nizamuddin S/o.Late Sri Mohd.Sardaruddin R/o.H.No.19-3-107/6, Jahanuma, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Nampally station Road Hyderabad 2 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, lakidikapool, Hyderabad 3 The Revenue Divisonal officer, Hyderabad East division Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad 4 The Tahasildar, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more especially one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not passing appropriate orders duly considering the representation made by the petitioners dated 20.10.2007 and consequently direct the respondents to consider and pass appropriate orders on the said representations of the petitioners and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.SUBBA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 27343 of 2007 Order: The petitioners state that they made representation dated 08.05.2006, followed by another representation dated 20.10.2007, requesting the 4th respondent, namely the Tahsildar, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, to implement the orders dated 29.12.1976 passed by the Board of Revenue in File No. A2/78/1969, but till date no orders thereon had been passed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: The 4th respondent, namely the Tahsildar, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, is directed to consider and dispose of the representation dated 20.10.2007 of the petitioners and pass appropriate speaking orders thereon in accordance with law, expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 23.04.2008 Ksr/Nsr