IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2009 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 6470 of 2009(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.C.YOUSAF, MANNARAYIL HOUSE,KECHERY, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. MR.P.N.SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.6470 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 19th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T The complaint in this writ petition is regarding the delay in settlement of timings in pursuance to Ext.P1 grant. It is noticed that, already, by Ext.P2 judgment in WP(C) No.7232/2008 filed by the petitioner, this Court has directed that timings will be settled in the order of priority. The petitioner states that though timing conference has been convened on two occasions, the same was adjourned, and therefore, the timings remains unsettled even as of now. Although, the petitioner seeks a direction to settle the timings and in case of delay issue the permit with proposed timings, as already stated, by Ext.P2, this Court has already directed settlement of timings in the order of priority. Therefore, it is up to the respondent to settle the timings. In this writ petition, the petitioner also does not have a case that his priority has been overlooked. In the circumstances, it is not proper to issue any further direction for settlement of timings, as this Court has already directed settlement of timings in Ext.P2. Therefore, the writ petition is closed. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg