IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.217 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.79 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4886 OF 2005 Madhav Prasad Morarka ... Appellant Versus Saroj Lata D. Jain ... Respondent Mr. K.K.V. Kurup for the appellant. Mr. K.Y. Mandlik i/by M/s. Hooseini Doctor & Co. for the respondent. CORAM : J.N. PATEL, ACTING C.J. & B.R. GAVAI, J. DATED : 29TH JANUARY, 2010 P.C. The appellant challenges the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Civil Application No.79 of 2007 in Writ Petition No.4886 of 2005. By the said order, the learned Single Judge has disposed of the application filed by the respondent-land lady with a direction to the respondent (appellant) to deposit Rs.1,84,100/- towards outstanding dues till December 31, 2008 and Rs.1500/- for the month of January, 2009. From the perusal of the impugned order, it is clear that the learned Single Judge has considered the evidence of the respondent before the trial court in which it was admitted that he was paying compensation initially at the rate of Rs.900/- per month, thereafter Rs. 1200/- per month and then Rs.1500/- per month. The learned Single Judge has continued the protection granted in favour of the tenant on the condition that the arrears of compensation amount is deposited in the court. 2. No illegality or error is found in the order of the learned Single Judge to warrant interference. Appeal is dismissed. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI, J.