.--..-;--.—.——]- CF0000064036 ApP^L OF PRISONER No. ^Stlff/r2-ifZ^ Name Father's name'- _ "") ^'^({/ -y^ 'y^-f Residence ^- ' "Q '_ ' ' ...^ ^ ' ' _ -^. Age 'y6~'eyy-<ey'^ y/'s^/ \"-y^pT^'^if.^Qy'.Syyyp Sentenced _^2^^1%s7^'.^^_3^^^ On :, J^/^, under section _^"_^'^^JS'^^:^^.'_by ^^•^^-c^'^t.^?^^''^^^' .^^ra^^Ss^^^^^^^^^'^^^z?^,.-^.^^^::^^?^'^/^^ ;^-7-k ">^^f.'.•,- . . '^^^^'^^T'i ^; ^l i1:~-~£s'e'%'l?i&ed to 6 iSf'i's'tfnef^fHS-fc if he sta^Ee's or'wl~sHg6-t;o be represented by..legal. practiti.oner fche Appeliste Gourt will not proceed with -fche base'for.seven days'unless the legal ®|iS'fetitioner appears. If the legal ..practitioner does not appegr with-in seven days he'may not heard at: all. .If the prisoner'sfca.fees'that he does not wi.sh •;'to be represented by legal practiotioner the court roay proceed at once with the case and will not be obliged to give a hearing to any legal practitionerwho should. appear. • . • . • , • 1. 2. 3. d Date of Application. for copy of Judgeme.nt _^^^/S^S_ Date of which copy received ^////Jf_/W1 Date on wh'ich appeal sent Whether the prisoner vyisl'ied to be representsc! or'not-Yes/No No. / Continued in Name ^) -fy^^y^^~ 't'.' -•-ft)._ Da'ted —S^T»i t" • > - Forward to the CHIEP JTJDICIAL GISTRATE to gather which a copy of order passed in the case for favour of ,transmission to the pro£er Appelliate Courti Superintendent ^ a^S^' D^^.pf^receipt in C.J.M's Office .L°^1L. . ,'it^nJ?'^i['rik<ig<ia3gw) ,Da^,e, o,f-> rseeSpt: record to acconpa ny_j^. ^1..2_1^tf.fiJ3. Memo of Appeal of the Appeliate Coyrt ~Sw( f?TqTOTI(' ®-^WTre"3i<-"l-^gC No. .—„S^^_.._„ Dated ___i_r,.L%^_5.B.od'99 _____ ^ Forwarded to the ~^-c-SET i?UTq-Tt'TiT'_JSo-'.l>^'L?'?fr' i'^^'y&LL^'.. C.J. I'sgistrate Date of receipt in Appeliate Court //SURGUJA TY.// * -•••• ••'•• Wv M XI-HC-78 +11+1^1 aiWh 3ST '<<l<<lcl<<, ®Ti1y'16,fsjMltty . ^^- 3^| Hltft ^i; 200^ Sii^i i^ach (yi(^sti^.g') 3n^T?>rR-ii+ awsn^TOTTO STgTmH^a'an^r ttii'iif<-i-'fl-i ^it<<-tTfftecz1'<f«i<^i< ^sif^irsn^T Qinsja" •ion'b'u Honb!e ^hf. V.K. Shrlvcstayh , JJ, *,4-a-9ni A~*S'—;?~&W Mrs. Usha ChQ?idrlQksr Mr. Akil Mishi^s. P^nsl l Oroi iudgmsnt aictstedl £ouH5£lfor ths appsllcnt. l^i'yys^ •for ths Stats/r^spondsnt. botf. eaon :" l., This cppeal js directed of ssntencs dated 8 Noyerhbe Surgs-ja in Sessions Tr'id No.: hoidinq the accused/soiseiisrfr Section 302 of ths I.P;C. sen( and to pcy c fine of Ss.200/1 undarqo S.I. fsr three monthsl Ths cs.ss, of ths sross^ -ha accused/'appeilsRt a+tacketi when in the next day worrli fviSiTtCHSH'Sr'Q tnTO?"iTt£Ci iil£^CI went +o *hs accuSi ^i.sciossd t'h^T Hs H^s c2?nir^i1"t'^ cxe and The ciodv nas oeen thereafts", took them to the Thsy saw that the body of Sh| '•"cs i3n iniury on ths ri9ht psri^Ta! ied and enduired aaainst the ju<J9ment of conviction snd order' rl'ber, 2000. passsd bv ths Ssssions Judoe, !p4/9S, wher'eby learned Sessions O'udge afts." guiity for sommission of offencs under '(•enced hin~, to undsr'qo imprisonn'ent for iifs }-, in default of payment of fins ts furthsr jution, i" brisf, is that at 6 p."i. on 1-8-1998, ;|j his wifs Shcnti Bai with backside of the axs, linq, viifs of the accused >®ss not visjble. rjpsnch and othe," vi!ie9ers. Tnei-eafter, they ^iiired troir, him about his i/iife on which he ^d the ?nur'^£fOT hls wiTs, Isv Q^"'t'cckinc3 'i'j'i't'h sn Ithrown in &haursqhat Nals. Tne cccused bicce where hs threw ths bodv of Shsntj Bai. ^n-ti Bai was !ying in ncked position snd thsre i! ragion. ri^Ta P.T.O. Xl-HC-78 T5?-fi<iid'y, »Tny'i6,Ri'-ii'Hy .:L fo.ft.3>S~/ <fl«^MI SWIW W[ 200f ^Tt^T qg^ (^gf^g^r) 3nt?T?iTR-ii<* (reT3:n^T»*<lch SiRITWCTfStTW^T cbMl<-i'ifl-( tiit<<-iTffte<^<Ri^TC ^3Tf^ff3TI^T ,l.—^t?LS-r ''.S'r^'S^-' The msttsr' was repprte^ Kamleshwsrpui- on 2-8-1998. at at^i Station House Offlcsr' of the Pol Ssstio.is 302 & 201 of the I.P.C. ft Rsmchand'ro. Recsivinq the ssld reit the piace of oceuf'rence and aft3"'^i preparsd the Panchnaffla (Ex.P-17) Station House Officer sl.so prspc4 from wh£."e the body was "ecovsrel ga'/s merTior'cnduffi Ex.P-13 on 3-1 .-ecovsr'ed th®axe under Ex.P-11 anc) of Shanti Bai wera taksn into posj s+ained soii snd ciothes ofthe cscei &IQCS of occurrsi'ic^ u?idsj" Sx.P-10 Bossession undsr Ex.P-14. Bodv of examination to 'Pritnar'y riealth Ci Prskash Pstsl conductsd post-mof prepared the post-mortsm report of desth was rssislt of ths hecd injui Keeoversd srticies wers sent for Scierice LsborQtory, Saqar, fr'OTi w'l and ss psrthe report, shirt diLung] blood, The oiace from rehsre the bio yiis ai'so fourid splattarsd wit.h biooi by Ramchandr'a in Po'ice Station; ;ut 9 p.ffl, Receiving tnis rsport, the ice Station registsred the case under ierg intimction Ex.P-6 wos aiso given by 'ort, the Stgtion House Office" ieft for v'mg notice to the Panchas (Ex.P-16), he of the dsad body of Shanti Bai. The ed ths site plsn (Ex.P-lS) cf the Na'a ^. Whils In police custody, ths accusad i-1998, in pursua."ce of that hs got his shirt under- Ex.P-12. Broksn bsn9!es session under Ex.P-9. Pisin soh, blood ied were tsken snto possession f"om the Lu^Qi of ths Gccu.ssd wss tcksn into hs deceased wos se;it for post-mortem sntre. Kafflleshwsrpur' whers &r. Ved ftem on ths body of Shcnti Bai and |<.P-2. The doctor opined that the eause |"/ and ths desth wos homicidcl m nstur'e. lchemjcs! exon'ination to t.he Forensic ^ere the report (Ex.P-22) wcs received bf the cccused were found stslned wlth .<)d stsinsd soi! wcs tsksn into possession P.T.O. J^ XI-HC-78 *11*1^1 sh+1I9» 3ST •^AWM'!A, »Ti1<rl'IS, (sjclK-iy __c^-./V. ^ +11tt» TRT 200 ] 3<|^<| Mach (yit^si^iiT) SIT^f^Tf^IR; oSTT 3TT^T sbHi<t> STdTiiK dfStT 3n^?r Etii^Fci41Ti WTcTf ^' te^t <f^'w.t< ^a'rt^R'sn^r ^.aaK-SS ..t-sy-se <':i^\ rli Aftsr cofnslst'on of in^ ccciised in the Court of Chielt cofflniitted the case to the Sei The pr-osacutlsn in or^ exorninsd fivs witnesses. Stt Sec+ion 313 of the Cr.P.C, 'tfi. appect'ing against hira and s1 liiegaily occupied his iand whe^ by h;s childr'sn, that is why Ra( Lsar'ned Sessions Jud;) and counssi for the accuseiti inentionsd in Bsra l of this ju^i We haye heard Mrs. ^estigstion, chsrge sheet wcs filed QgQJnst the Judicial Msgistrcts, Ambikapur, who in tyrn |sions Judge, Sur'q'uja. pe." to establish. charga cgsinst tha Qecused btement of the cccused wcs r'ecor'dsd unde" \'f{- R which he denied the Br-osscution evidence lcted thst he 'i.s innocsnt. Samchandi-a had 1 he was in custodv, which was iriforn-sed to him ^ichsndfG h<s3 givsr! ^vidsi^cs egsLi^t hs^. a afte" hearing Adclitionci Pubiic Prosecutor i, convictsd and sentsnced the accused as gment. aG&siisnt snd Mr. Akhil Mi^hrd Usha Chsndrskar, iearned counssl for ths lear'nsd P^nsl LGI^/VSP o" bshQlf of ths Stots/ rssDondeRt. The honiicidol death ofl thst, Dr. Vsd Prakash Pstel (P'| of Shcnti Bai, hss stcted in H'ounds on th®riGht sids of tH T em. and anather' one was in contusion cbove the riaht scH anothar contusion behind the that the above iniuries couldl iniu^lss we-r®3u'f'fici€irtt to cd IShanti Bai has not been cisoutad. Apsrt from ^V-l), who coi'iductsd post-mortem on the body Ihis e'/yence that there were two iaceroted Is hscid, ons WQS in ths ^izs of 6 c,m5. x 1 cvn. x 1-he size of 4 ems. x1cm.x i- em.. Tnere wcs in the siz£of 8 cms. x 8 cms. snti there was hssd In the size of 6 cms. x 6 cms.. He opined be caused by s hcrd & biunt ob.ject and the suss dssth In th©oi^di^Qrv coufS®o'f ?i<sturs-, Tne deatn was homicidai in nc'\u<~e.. His report is Ex.P-2. ftan'chandro ycdav- P.T.O. T^ XI-HC-78 3^ ^ll'l|ld4, (STfly'Ko, fsK-IKjy C^-A-'3^1' +<I*IMI ai^icb ^T 200) STT^TTgw (y<t^si<<<r) an^TSRfR-fich W Sff^f st>1 gTctrwgfN'sn^r 4)l''lld41-< miRfl'' ff fe<^t ^fafRR ^3lf^ff3TI^T ^tjS'St^ ot4d (?W-2) hss cctegorically stQt4i judicial confession before hin^ the axe, he slso disclossd whet of thst, thc body wss rscovsr it is established that the deatit ,4s fsr as involvementl coneernsd, learnsd counsei sxaminstion ths doctor hss st| ths dscsass'd was not 1^11' further stcted that the irijury coijid not be causea by thel srosecution hss r,o* bssn cbie Sut. we do not find any 'ff^y '^]^ss n^^^'ll^'n^' '^fy A'i^^>, 'r'^'^?! ^^w^—..,-^. ...u I->»-^ in his evidance thst the occused wada extra re9ar£4inS ccuSiHg the death of his wifs with •s the bodv of his wife w/as Ivino. in oursuonce :d. Ths.-sfore, in VJSK) of the abovs svidenca, i,of Shsnti Bai was homicidal in nsture. of the occused in the cnme in question is for the cppeiiant at-9U£d thot in cross- ztsd thst the injury which WGS on forehssd of with tha iength of ths biode c?id he has which was found on forehead of the decenssd shcrp sdqe of ths axs, Thersfor'e, ths •o estabiish QS to how the injury was ccussd'. substance in ths ar'gument of iearned counse' ••^n 't'H'1'^' in ^'k^f '?IM<?'T ' tn'^'4''ft!n?*'sSi '^S'i.'1? •Hn/''s''nF1 stated in his excminction-in-1 forehesd of the dececsed, WQ; sizs of tha injury dspends on the cxs hit on forehead of tH Gcujsr* syldsncs s.^d ths CQ£S rl arqument oavanced by. learned ascertaining involyement ot th< aamchandra (PW-2), wH svidence that on enquiry, the a. gons to fore.st, but on furthe; committed ths murder sf his |:hief that the injury, whlch was foynd on caused by o hcrd A blunt object. Thersfors, '^ ^flVft V*^stJ**i^1 ?*^J1;jfl^a/^S^ /^-V ^/»r^*^/--^i ^3 ^^ .^^'+' ifi<Jii faUW fnU^Fi ywi'iiwii v! iL»ui<?Si?i'Ljtt u| i|e deceased. In this ccss, there is no diract tests of3 clr'cuiiistisntiol svidsncs, cs such, ths counsei for ths sppsliant is not reievant i" aceusad in ths crims in qusstion. !p is a vilici9er, has cstegorjcaiiy stctsd in his ifccused disclosed befors him that his wife has eri^ulry th©accu^^d co^fesssd that hs hss iliiife by sttackina with an axe cnd thfew her P.T.O. Xl-HC-78 3TI^?Tq5TR-li'h miTsn^Tshiiict) 3^T '^WWi, tSlfltf'ltS, fslclKI; c.^- *11H^I St»*1|c»l ;,1>:...^1^ 2001 3TT^?Tlra?f; (^qt^q^ff) ?Tmwstf?a'sn^sr body in &hGursghat Nata. Ths Shontl 8d yv'as attacksd, H€ room thers wss biood. Thsresf ths body of Shant! Bal '.".'ss iy Bsburam, Sukhirarn etc; clso f;4 <'f.l body of decsased was coveredd, the forehead of Shonti Bsi. Tl' Sas. PW-2 has further ststed of his ssi^H^r wlfs, for thot hs complstinq the sentence and in| his prssent wif£ Shanti Bsi. once the accused shot sr.-ow incorrect to say thct he is givjnfci -?^rri- Rcnjset Ekks (PVV-4), 54 whiie in oolice custodv. the it pursuGncs of that he got reeovs •& F-11, respecti'/ely. Lungi of t! r^-f.yt ?htf>. rsi»^^r"' n'? th^ ? ..^ 1 i r"~" ••'--• - •^•—f • —i••.r . .—.—.^, « biood. Tne esrth, which was occurrance, hcs slso been fou"c Ssndhsn Rsra (PW-5), wh time. has also stcted in his evid viljQOsr'5 SMQU'rsd troi^ ths informed thst his wife as mne t ^rafe^T iDT^rf ^'te'^l'rfSrezR ^aTf^iian^r accussd hss oiso shown hiw the piaca ishera PVV-2) saw that on the entirs fioor of the ter, the cccussd took him to the NQla whsre ng. At thst tima, Bandhan Ram, SoR'Qrsci, -nt thsrs sjong with them, they scw that the (ith branches of tres and fhers was jn.iuryon ^e.re were no ciothes on ths body of ahanti "hst the acc'dsed also committed the rriurder' iVss convictsd s;"d ssfitencsd. ccrn^ out oftsr the same year he corsimitted the murde" of '.n cross-exQniination, he has stinii-rtsd -hhot at hiffl, but it could not hit him snd it js evidence against the accused on account of tlhe ib Inspsctor', h<as stcted in his evidsnce thct sccused aQve msinorandym Ex,P-13 ord in ;red the shirt ss atso the <sx£ under Exs.P-l2 ie accused wos r'ecovered under Ex.P-14. As ihirt <^ Luncs! hovs bssn found 3tGfned !/.rith tcken into possession from the plsce of stcined with biood. ? was SarpGnch of ths vlllage ct the reievent ^ncs thst ct sbout 4 p.m. whsn he cnd other' s£eyfigd/-;3BQg.||5?st rs-^srdl^s his wi'f^. hs |o hersistsrs olace. On enauirv. it wss found P.T.O. ^ XI-HC-78 3^r "i| 1.41(rl4, ^•rfl+f'16, RfrtW^ ^T.A- 3^jo^ tn*lrt) sh*1|cb ^[200 3Ti^?T(ra^; (y(^Git^.a') W^TqiTl^IW gqT3TT^Tsht|l» STdTW'ETfStTSn^T °bi'yfa41-t wivK tf fs^S t.fst'wM. ^Slf^ITSn^T "^''^as-;t-... i^^^> ..- /^ .^' ^ 3^ / •••I. 'L.~' //^ ^" -hat ";!fe of ths secused haiti snquired fi-orn the accused. H the decsssed wcs found. On fl|> 'nas ,'TiL'rdsrsd hls'wlts. i nsreTore, T"e •sccusep Ron'ichsndr'a yadav (PVi/-2) & confession stonds corroboratsct clothes of ths aecused as a!so ths ^ccused snd ths yl£coy2ylv 4' accijssa whers the offersce wssl ths considered opinion that the| or infirrriity in convlcting and se\ In ths rssult, the app^i diSi^isssd Qnd It i^hsrsbv disiTiil Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge not aons, rhc^s. cspd thsrs'rore . hs "ctain took them to the Ncia where the body of "ther" enauir'v, the oecused intor'med thot ha made extra judicJGi confession before iandhcn Ram fPW-5). The extro iudicic! ^, by t'he r'ecovsr'y of the axe and bioodstcinsd 1'he r'ecovery cf the body ct the insfance of if biood^t^insd £s^thfron^ ths houss of the committed. In ths circumstances, we are of tr'iai Court has not conimitted any iilecalit-y itencinq the accused. s! is devoid of !nerit. ssme is liabie to be ssea. : .- V.K.Shrivastava i Judge P.T.O.