MC 4053/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Bhattacharya, learned counsel for the applicants. None appears for the respondents though the name of the learned counsel for the respondent N o.1 is reflected in the cause list. The applicants by the present application is seeking condonation of dela y of 60 days in preferring the appeal against the order dated 01.12.2009 passed by the learned Commissioner, Workmen’s Compensation, Dhubri in W.C. Case No.12/2 005, on the ground taken in paragraph 2 of the application. No affidavit-in-opposition has been filed objecting the prayer for condo nation of delay and also disputing the statements made in the application seekin g condonation of delay, more particularly in paragraph 2 thereof. Having heard the learned counsel for the applicants and upon considerati on of the averments made in the application, I am of the view that the applicant s were prevented by sufficient cause in not preferring the appeal in time. Hence the delay of 60 days occurred in filing the the appeal is condoned . Misc. case stands allowed.