....-yV^ • BFN^-i ^\^^'" • s—B-£eaw-f <^^£^ ,...-<%^:^"""" ' f^t^..-y":" ~ ^' CT yw°~; ..-••"'' IN THB^IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) .c^ ... WRIT PETITION N0. \\c} OF 2007 PETITIONER c>y RESPONDENT Milan Hait Son of Shrikant Hait, aged about 28 years, Resident of C/o Shri Birendra Kumar Thawait, Qr. No. K-33, Kranti Nagar, Behind Sai Manglam, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS Guru Ghasidas University, Koni Bilaspur, (C.G.), Through: The Registrar. /•' WRIT PETiTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 sn^T^irf?^; (raT3n^rst»ii°b «1TH(^T <»)*TT<b A^-^J /^/6^ 'SSf -<{WW^, W^\WI<v, fslcll+f^ ..^.t.ta^.^.^^ 7 3||^<>| '4a<»)(yit^'!t<i,iT) S^lTWflfgcTan^r 29.01.2007 Ku. Pushpa Dwivedi, Heard on admission.l I heDetitioner was M.5c. Drevious examinatioili vide Annexure P-l. He 2U06, however this time revaluation and the Univle l^dvocate tor the Detitioner. dated 10-7-2006 informeiti ^ WMJM »«(- was no change in fhe Pape^s Detitioner is that the val was not properly done at revaluation as the petiti and in the atoresaid direction to the resoondeht' tor recheckincj ot the I have heard the ledrn From perusa] of maK that in the M.5c. Dreviout marks whereas in the M.St fcxceot this. there is nothinq 'hiilci'fl-f tiiiciTfffst^l'<Ri*<ii< ^;3lf^IT3TI^T student of M.5c. (Chemistry). He appeared in in fhe year 2004 and obtained 59.17% marks aDfceared in M.5c. final examination in the year Ke secured only 5^.33% marks. He aDDlied tor nivlersit/ vide communication ot Annexure P-4 neiti the Detitioner t'hat after revaluation, there 's 'i and 4 ot M.5c. tinal. Ihe orievance ot the lUation ot the answer sheets of Dapers 'i and 4 t-he time ot initial valuation ond thereatter on obtained iesser marks than he exDected ;, the petitioner has prayed tor a ideht-University to aDDoint an exoert Professor sheets ot the oetitioner. ledrned counsel tor the Detitioner. 11'k sheets of Annexure P-1 and P-3, it aDDears ib examination the oetitioner obtained 59.17% :. tinol exaniination, he secured yd.~d~37o marks. on record which mav Dersuade this Court to toher cir'ttumstances, ansvter ledrned XI-HC-78 3n^TqiTR-fi+ (raT3ll«lst)11ct) ?/ <^1 3^ '^l<<ld'M, »Tfl«'is,Ri<niuy ^••P-CC^.IM 0,U5/^oo7- *11*1MI ^HKh <R7 200 W^W 4^* ('i,cl^<sl<<el') ?T(TTWBf??T3n^T d- Intertere in the valuation when atter revaluation. thel unchanqed. Ihe Detitioner seek the direction which he It In the result, the oetil :onducted by the respondent. Darticularly marKs oblained by the oetitioner remained not been able to make out a ground to ins prayed tor. rion is dismissed at admission stage. Has 4il'yfrl41-f IIHdT ff fSCS <Ri^l< ^sri^irsn^T Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O. ^h