1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6322 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr.A.S.Sawant, counsel for petitioner. Mr.G.D.Jain, counsel for R.5. CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 15/09/2010 1] Admittedly father of Pundlik and Kishan was tenant in respect of the property and he was declared as owner. On his demise, both the brothers are claiming their exclusive entitlement to the property. Respondent Kisan is represented by his widow Bhimabai who is arrayed as respondent no.5 in the Petition. 2] On perusal of the judgment, I am of the view that dispute arose between the parties is required to be dealt with by a competent Civil Court. Question of entitlement to the property 2 of both brothers is a matter to be dealt by Civil Court. The parties have liberty to approach competent Court and obtain necessary order in respect of entitlement in the property. The revenue entries recorded are for fiscal purposes and those do not confer or divest any title to the parties. The revenue entries those are recorded will obviously have to be corrected after determination of rights by the Civil Court. The entires recorded shall be subject to such order. With these observations, Writ Petition stands disposed of. (R.M.BORDE,J.) umg/wp6322-09