WP(C) 4843/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Heard Mr. R Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S Chamaria, lear ned Standing Counsel for the Agriculture Department. The petitioner is seeking a direction to initiate action against the respondent No. 5, Ms. Arundhati Choudhury for labelling false allegation of sexual harassment at work place against him. Mr. Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the complaint of the respondent No. 5 was duly enquired into by a committee constituted by the Agriculture Deptt and the allegations were found to be basel ess. In other words, according to the learned counsel, the petitioner has been e xonerated and the respondent No. 5 stands exposed for making false allegations a gainst the petitioner which has affected the dignity and status of the petitione r in public esteem. The learned counsel also submitted that after the department ’s committee report, the petitioner has submitted a representation to the Direct or, Agriculture Depptt., Assam praying for appropriate disciplinary action again st respondent No.5. However, no such action has been taken. In the writ petition, it has been categorically stated that the p etitioner has already filed a criminal case against respondent No.5 in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup and simultaneously a case has also been fi led in the Court of Civil Judge, Kamrup. In my considered opinion, if the petitioner has been aggrieved by the alleged false allegations of the respondent No. 5, he can pursue his rem edy in an appropriate courts. In fact the petitioner has filed criminal case and damage suit. Hence, I am not persuaded to entertain this writ petition.