IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8976 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- R N SAIYED Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 8976 of 1999 MS JAISHREE HINGORANI with MR NAVIN K PAHWA for Petitioner No. 1-7 M/S PATEL ADVOCATES for Respondent No. 1 MR N.D.GOHIL, AGP for Respondent No. 1,2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD Date of decision: 16/10/2003 ORAL JUDGEMENT Heard learned advocate Ms. Jaishree Hingorani with learned advocate Mr. Navin K Pahwa for petitioners and learned AGP Mr. N.D.Gohil appearing on behalf of respondents. 2. When the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned advocate Ms. Jaishree Hingorani has submitted that she has received a copy of the letter dated 29/30.9.2003 from the Government Pleader Office to the effect that the petitioner has been reinstated in service and accordingly benefit has been given to the petitioner and therefore, according to her submission this petition can be disposed of on the basis of the said letter. Learned AGP Mr. N.D.Gohil has also stated the same thing before this Court but the request is made by learned advocate for the petitioner Ms. Jaishree Hingorani that in case if any difficulty arise, liberty may be given to the petitioner to revive the present petition before this Court. 3. Considering the submissions made by both the learned advocates present petition is disposed of on the basis of the letter dated 29/30.9.2003. It is made clear that in case of any difficulty, it is open for the petitioner to revive the present petition by filing merely a note in the registry of this Court. Rule is discharged. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. The copy of the letter dated 29/30.9.2003 is kept on record. (H.K.Rathod,J) Jayanti*