UilK Tjtial^uil H^H-GOURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BiLASPUR Writ Petition ffiV No. 2 of 20® Petitioner Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. Kushal Prasad Kaushik, S/o. Shri Baiaram Kaushik, a.ged about 47 years, Assistant Teachsr, Shashkiya Purva Madhyamik Shala, Tarbahar, Bilaspur, Block Bilha, Distt. BJ!aspurr(C.G.) The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G^ DlstrictEducationOfflcer,Bllaspur,Dlstt. Biiaspur, (C.G.) Block Education Offlcer, Block Bilha Distt.Bi!aspur,(C.G.) Principai, Govt. Higher Secondary Schooi, Tarbahar, Distt. Bitaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITOiN UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Singte Bench : Hon'bleMr. SatishK. Agnihotri, J. Shri K.S. Pawar.Aclvocate forthe peUtioner. Shri A. S. Kachwaha, Deputy Advocate General forthe respondents, ORALORDER (Passed on this 1st day o^February, 2008} 1. The petitioner was appointed initially, on afixed pay of Rs. 15Q/-. The petitioner was thereaSer, granted regular pay scale on comptetion of the probation period. 2, The qu^tion of law invotved herein is, asto whether the petitioner is entitied to regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of initia! appointment or from thedate ofcompletion ofprobation period. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as tearned counsel appearing for the respondente/State, jointly submit that the facts and ^ question of law, involved in e present writ petition, are the sams asto that of in W.P.(S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushi! Tiwari & othere Vs. State Govt. ofChhattisgarh & others), virtiiGh was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. 4. In view of tiie above-stated submissions mads by teamed counset appearing forthe parties. the writ petition is aitewed in the sameterms i.e. petitioner is entitled for r^ular pay scale w.e.f. the. date of initial appointment, subjectto verificationofthefacts.Noorder asto costs. Sd/- ^. /^ Satish K. Agnihotn ,-:-^' Judge ^