IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRL. REVISION NO.1714 OF 2006 Date of decision: 28.3.2011 Parmajit Singh Nanda ...Petitioner Versus Tarsem Singh and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr.Gautam Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner. ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the FIR in question was not filed by the petitioner in personal capacity. However, same was filed by the petitioner on behalf of the company. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that after the impugned acquittal judgment, accused have filed a suit for recovery/damages against the petitioner for malicious prosecution, therefore, necessity arises for filing the present revision petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner further contends that in a suit the petitioner shall raise this point. He has not filed FIR in his personal capacity and lodged the FIR in question on behalf of the company, so suit cannot be filed against the petitioner and suit and any compensation can only be sought and granted against the company. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to CRL. REVISION NO.1714 OF 2006 -2- withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all the available legal points in the pending suit. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. March 28, 2011 (Alok Singh) kd Judge