CRM No. M-175 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. M-175 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 7.5.2009 Shri Basau ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Bhag Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Senior DAG, Haryana. Mr. Dalel Singh Nain, Advocate for the complainant. Rajan Gupta, J. This is a petition seeking concession of anticipatory bail in a case bearing FIR No.128 dated 24th June, 2008, under Sections 406, 420, 506 read with Section 34 IPC, registered at Police Station City Narwana, District Jind. Learned counsel for the State (on the instructions from S.I. Vijay Singh, who is present in Court) submits that despite repeated orders, passed by this Court, the petitioner has failed to cooperate with the investigating agency as he is armed with the protective order from this Court. He has relied upon State rep. By CBI Vs. Anil Sharma, (1997) 7 SCC 187 to contend that effective investigation cannot be conducted till the petitioner is armed with the protective order. According to the counsel, custodial interrogation is more elicitation- CRM No. M-175 of 2009 2 oriented than questioning a suspect who is well ensconced with a favourable order. It appears that the petitioner is not likely to cooperate with the investigating agency in case there is protective order in his favour. He is thus not entitled to concession of anticipatory bail. The bail petition is hereby dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE May 07, 2009. 'rajpal'