Civil Revision No. 1718 of 2009 -1- ***** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1718 of 2009 Date of decision : 21.5.2010 Amar Singh ....Petitioner Versus Joginder Kaur and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Manish Prabhakar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sarabjit Singh, Advocate for the respondents S. D. ANAND, J. The respondents are legal representatives (wife and children) of Gurcharan Singh, a deceased son of the petitioner-Amar Singh. The latter filed a suit under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act for a direction to the petitioner herein to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.2000/- for respondent no.1 and Rs.1500/- each to respondents no.2 and 3 per month. The plea raised was that the maintenance may be paid with effect from the date of filing of the suit. In the course of the proceedings of that petition, the respondents filed an application for the grant of interim maintenance and also for a direction that there shall be a charge on the property in the hands of the petitioner herein. The application came to be allowed by the learned Trial Court which held that all the respondents shall be entitled to Rs.3000/- (Rs.1000/- each) with effect from the date of application for interim maintenance i.e. 26.5.2004. It was further ordered that the “interim maintenance will be first charge upon the co-parcenary property and Civil Revision No. 1718 of 2009 -2- ***** defendant is directed not to dispose of the share of plaintiffs in the coparcenary property held by him as per Jamabandi for the year 1998-99.” In terms of consensual arrangement, noticed in the course of order dated 28.1.2010, it was agreed that petitioner herein shall transfer 1/9th share of his agricultural holding in the name of respondent no.1- Joginder Kaur and that the transfer would be in her own right and also on behalf of her two minor daughters. The petitioner herein has complied with the above consensual arrangement in toto. Relevant transfer deed has been executed by the petitioner herein in the name of respondent no.1-Joginder Kaur which (land) she would hold for self and on behalf of two minor daughters. That transfer has come about in lieu of 1/9th share held by the deceased husband of respondent no.1 in the ancestral property. Learned counsel for the parties further informs that a passage for reaching land aforementioned has already been provided. They further agree that the passage provided shall continue to be available to the respondent for their life. Disposed of accordingly. May 21, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE