IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINTAL Writ Petition No. 1288 of 2008 (M/S) Smt. Shashi Agrwal & others - Petitioners Vs. Madan Mohan Sharma - Respondent Mr. T.A. Advocate for the petitioners None for the respondent. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C. J. After hearing the arguments of Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate, I feel totally convinced that no case is made out for interference by this Court at all. The Civil Court is seized of the temporary injunction application. This Court had passed an order on 19th June, 2008 in W.P. 1007 of 2008 (MS). In that order this Court had clearly directed that till the temporary injunction application was disposed of by the trial court status quo qua the nature and possession of the property in question as existing on 19th June, 2008 should be maintained by the parties. In that order this Court had also appointed a three member team of Advocate commissioners for survey and inspection of the property in question. The order dated 19th June, 2008, however, was modified on 24th June, 2008 in so far as the extent of the subject matter, namely, the land in question was concerned. In the order dated 19th June, 2008 the Court had not taken note of the specific area, dimensions or particulars of the land forming the subject matter of the writ petition. However, in the order dated 24th June, 2008 the Court after noticing various relevant aspects of the matter and a very pertinent fact that land measuring 4.0875 acres alone should be considered as the subject matter of the suit because that was the only piece of land which was claimed to be owned and possessed by the respondent/defendant Madan Mohan Sharma. The learned trial court shall keep the aforesaid fact in mind while disposing of temporary injunction application. Mr. Khan’s apprehension that personal liberty of the petitioners may be jeopardised, can be met by observing and directing that the petitioners would be once again at liberty to approach Senior Superintendent of Police Udham Singh Nagar. If the petitioners do so, I direct Senior Superintendent of Police Udham Singh Nagar to ensure that he will assess after due application of mind and based on inputs that he has or may receive as to whether there is any threat perception, if any to the petitioners. If in his opinion there is indeed a threat perception to the petitioners, he will provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners. (V.K. Gupta, C. J. ) 28.7.2008 JPT