IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA LPA No. 7 of 2010 Decided on 6.5.2010. _________________________________________________ State of H.P. and Others …Appellants. Versus Satya Dev Shukla …Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the Appellants: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl AG, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy AG. For the Respondent : Mr. Lokender Paul Thakur, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) CMP(M) No. 69 of 2010. Allowed. LPA No. 7 of 2010. State is aggrieved by the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 5.3.2009 in CWP(T) No. 2314 of 2008. The writ petitioner, though appointed as daily waged Mazdoor, he was actually working as a Clerk. Taking note of that Learned Single Judge disposed of the writ petition directing the appellant to pay wages to the petitioner for the period he worked as a Clerk. 2. Learned Senior Additional Advocate General submits that the petitioner was appointed only as a Mazdoor and there was no post of Clerk available to accommodate the petitioner. But it is seen from Annexures A-1 to A-5, official communication, that the writ petitioner had been working as daily wage Clerk and that he had been subsequently regularized also. 3. Learned Senior Additional Advocate General submits that the judgment, in any case, may not be interpreted so as to have a claim for wages of regular post of Clerk. We make it clear that for the period, the writ petitioner worked as a Clerk, the period as certified in Annexures A-1 to A-5, the petitioner would be entitled only to the daily wages of a Clerk. Subject to the above clarification, the appeal is disposed of. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice May 6, 2010(k/s) (Justice R.B. Misra) Judge