IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39900 of 2006 RANJIT SHARAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 25.8.2008. Heard Mr. Subroteswar De, the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned A.P.P. for the State. Although O.P. No.2 was duly served with notice, he has chosen not to appear to contest this application. It appears that in Criminal Misc. 42803 of 2006, the other accused of Complaint Case No.1377 of 2002 had prayed for the quashing of the order dated 2.9.2002 and the same was allowed vide order dated 13.8.2008 on the basis of both the parties having amicably compromised their differences and compounded the offence. Since the petitioner herein, is also one of the accused and the compromise had been arrived at between the parties, the order dated 13.8.2008 passed in Criminal Misc. No.42803 of 2006, wherein the impugned order taking cognizance was quashed and the application was disposed of accordingly in terms of the compromise, the same shall be applicable in this case also and it is hereby directed that the impugned order dated 2.9.2002 taking cognizance against the petitioner herein is hereby quashed and the application is disposed of in terms of the compromise . P.S. (Abhijit Sinha,J)