iinglg IN THE HI®HCOURT OF CHHATTISGAIIH AT BIiASPUR Second Appeal No.-rL\ / 2005 SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDyilE- 1988 •^ APPELLANTS 6EFENDANTS IIESPONDENT PLAINTIFF 1. Forest Department Govt. of Chhattlsgarh through Dlvisional Forest OfRcer,{General Forest Diviston}/ Raja Talabr Raipur {C.G.} 2. State of Chftattisgarh, through Collector, Raipur {C.G.> VERSUS /.^ 1/y s^ ^' r^^l >atishchandra Shrivastava, S/o Late Rajnlkant Shrivastava, Advocate^ R/0 Rajni Chhaya, Civit Llne, Balodaba^r, Distt. Raipur <C.G.} XI-HC-78 CT^T^T^icn cT^T3TT^T$b^|cb ^ll/llllN'- v/f *11+1^1 Sh*lici> 3^T ^NId^, ^Tfl<M41(o, fsfdKiy , ^ , A-. -^". ^^^ 200^ 3(1^1 451«t»(*lcl^<s«<^iT) ^RTrw:^rf?cf^n^T 19^2-2007 Shri G.D.Vaswanl, Govt. Shri Prakash Tiwari, cour| Heard. The appeiiant Is aggn'e^ .21-08-2004 in Civi! Appeal No.' District Judge, Baloda Bazar,(C| dated 25-06-2003 in Civii Suit N Ciass-i, Baioda Bazar (C.G.) plajntiff on account of monkey m| Both the Courts beio^l awardsd generai symbolic darr] defendants had also in para-5(b] to pay compensation oniy in pubilc property by a wi!d animai. | in this view of the m^ invoived in this appeai. jn the result thls appeai to oost. l^dvocate for the appeJiants/State. |se! for the respondent. j'ed by the judgment and decree dated 11W2003 passed by the llnd Additiona! |.G.) whereby the judgment and decree |o.140-A/2002 passed by the Civj! Judge gr^nting compensation of Rs.1,000/- to the fenace was affirmed. on proper apprsciation of evidence (ages of Rs.1,000/- to the piaintiff. The of sts written statement accepted iiabiiity a^ss cf serious injup^ or damage caused to ca^ss cbi^t<n41Ti Hi^<nT^te^<(^<^i< ^3Tf^T3:n^?T II' ^, tter, HQ substantial question of iaw is is dlsmissed. There shali be no order as Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge r-