IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ No.1126 of 2011 Ram Nandan Prasad @ Lakhan Lal Versus The State Of Bihar Through The ---------------------------------- 2 20.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Pankaj Kumar Jha, AC to SC-12. Personal whims is the source of origination of instant petition though it should not have and in the aforesaid background, the petition for complaint which was filed on 12.10.2011 and it subsequent orders which itself justify its pendency, and having it bypassed through different methods led institution of instant petition. Be that as it may, at an earlier occasion under Cr.W.J.C. No.895 of 2011, the learned Sessions Judge, Gaya was directed to keep surveillance over the court and office of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya on account of some sort prevalent malady wherein, it appears, the learned Sessions Judge failed. Therefore, it is brought to the notice of the learned Sessions Judge that failure on his part to abide with the direction of the Hon’ble Court will make him liable for disobedience. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate will see that all the cases pending before him is being properly cared with. The learned counsels are also expected to actively cooperate and by this way, the grievances would not been raised on behalf of petitioner that the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has become sterile towards him, will automatically redressed. With the aforesaid observation, instant petition is disposed of. PN (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)