:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL JURISDICTION. REVIEW PETITION NO. 112 OF 2005 REVIEW PETITION NO. 112 OF 2005 REVIEW PETITION NO. 112 OF 2005 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5495 OF 1988 WRIT PETITION NO. 5495 OF 1988 WRIT PETITION NO. 5495 OF 1988 -------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders -------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Ranjit A. Thorat for the petitioner. Mr. M.V. Pandey for the respondent. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 23.9.2005 . Heard both the parties. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner has raised the basic issues to reconsider the submission, specially as reflected in para 11. The issue about the jurisdiction based upon the averments made in the plaint has also been considered, while :2: passing the final order in question. The judgments relied have also been taken note of. Lastly, the submission revolving around section 41 of Presidency Small Causes Court Act, 1982, based upon the facts and circumstances of the case has been answered after considering the rival contentions raised by the parties. 2. Taking all these into account, there is nothing to demonstrate any error apparent on the record. Therefore, this review petition is dismissed. 3. However, with the consent of the parties, further time to vacate the premises in question is extended for further period of 8 weeks from today on a condition not to create any third party :3: interest and further that they shall clear the arrears of rent, if any, within two weeks from today. . C.C. expedited. (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]