CWP No. 19154 of 2006 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CWP No. 19154 of 2006 Date of Decision: 4.12.2006 Dr. Amrish Kaur ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others. ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr.Justice J.S. Khehar. Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.D. Anand. Present: Mr. P.K. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. ... J.S. Khehar, J. (Oral). After learned counsel for the petitioner had addressed arguments for some time, we formed a prima-facie opinion, that the factual position narrated in the instant writ petition was incorrect. Even the documents appended to the writ petition seem to have been created to make out a story. We had arrived at our tentative view after perusing some of the originals of the annexures, handed over to us by the learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of hearing. It is, therefore, that we decided to issue a notice to the petitioner so as to seek her personal explanation, and in case the same was unsatisfactory, to order her prosecution. At that stage, learned counsel for the petitioner made a prayer, that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition. We agreed to the request of the CWP No. 19154 of 2006 2 learned counsel for the petitioner, subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- as costs. This conditional liberty to withdraw the instant writ petition was also accepted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with costs of Rs.10,000/-. The aforesaid costs shall be deposited by the petitioner with the Secretary, Legal Services Authority, Punjab, within one month from today, and the receipt thereof shall be placed on the record of this case, within one week thereafter. In case, such a receipt is not placed on the record of this case within the time stipulated hereinabove, the main case shall be posted for further hearing. After this order was dictated, learned counsel for the petitioner requested, that the original documents perused by us during the hearing of this case, be returned. The same were, accordingly, returned. Disposed of in the aforesaid terms. ( J.S. Khehar ) Judge. ( S.D. Anand ) Judge. 4.12.2006 sk.