IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CR No.3063 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.05.2011 Vijay Kumar . . .Petitioner Versus Mohan Lal . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Deepak Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This revision petition is directed against order dated 05.04.2011 by which the learned Rent Controller, Jalandhar has assessed the provisional rent. The only argument raised by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the landlord cannot claim arrears of rent for a period of seven years on the ground that the arrear is time barred. However, he has failed to show any provision of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (under which the present eviction petition has been filed) in this regard. In view thereof, I do not find any merit in the present revision petition and as such the same is hereby dismissed. No costs. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MAY 11, 2011 JUDGE Vivek