IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32429 of 2010 MUKESH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 22.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. Informant’s husband is shot dead in the incident in the night. Submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is that four persons are named in the F.I.R. either seen at the place of occurrence by the informant or told by the deceased that co-accused Surya Narayan Mandal was the main assailant accompanied by Dinesh Mandal and Arun Mandal. Petitioner’s name appears after four days of the incident after coming of informant’s son from Punjab that petitioner was stating there about killing by him also; may not be taken for refusal of anticipatory bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Supaul P. S. Case No.252 of 2002, subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)