WPSS No. 1065 of 2010 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. A.K. Bansal, Advocate, present for respondent no.4. The only contention of the petitioner in the writ petition is that the appointment of respondent no. 4 as Angan Bari Karyakatri is bad inasmuch as she is not below poverty line. In spite of the time given to the respondents, they have not filed any counter affidavit ascertaining this vital aspect. Respondent nos. 2 and 3 are, therefore, directed to file their separate counter affidavits within three weeks from today, specifically replying as to what is the status of respondent no. 4, and whether she is below poverty line, or not. Meanwhile Sri A.K. Bansal, Advocate representing respondent no. 4 has filed an income certificate pertaining to respondent no. 4, which is from Tehsildar, Up Tehsil Gaja, Tehri Garhwal, which shows that the annual income of the petitioner’s husband is ` 950/-. The same is taken on record. Learned counsel for respondent no. 4 states that he will also file his counter affidavit within three weeks. List this matter after vacations. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 6.1.2011 Rathour