-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. FIRST APPEAL NO.873 OF 2003 With Civil Application No.1952 of 2003 Rambhavan Ramlakhan Verma, .. Appellant vs Babali Ramanlal Divan (deleted) 1/A Mrs Asha Datta Anandkar and ors .. Respondents Mr S.U.Dhakephalkar, h/f Mr P.K.Dhakephalkar, senior cousenl, for the appellant. Mr J.J. Xavier, for respondent no.9. Ms A.B.Kapadia i/b M/s D.F.Diwan, for respondent no.6. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 15.11.2006 DATE : 15.11.2006 DATE : 15.11.2006 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 5.3.2003, by which the suit filed by the appellant came to be dismissed as infructuous. In the suit, the appellant had prayed for injunction restraining all the defendants from dispossessing the appellant from the disputed premises. The suit came to be dismissed against defendant nos 1 to 8 and in view thereof, Mr Dhakephalkar, learned counsel for the appellant, submits that if the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-corporation makes a statement that they shall not dispossess the appellant without -2- following due process of law, he would not press the appeal. Mr Xaiver, learned counsel for the corporation, submits that the corporation shall not demolish the structure without following due process of law. His statement is accepted. In view thereof, nothing further survives in the first appeal. The first appeal along with the civil application stands disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)