1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.290 OF 2003 Shri Shyamrao Krishna Gadiwadd. ..Petitioner. V/s. The President, Senapati Prataprao Gujar Shikshan Sanstha & ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Suresh Pakale for petitioner. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : JUNE 16, 2006. DATE : JUNE 16, 2006. DATE : JUNE 16, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. By this petition grievance is made about the wilful disobedience of the order of the court passed by the Division Bench on 25th April, 2003, whereunder the respondents were directed not to terminate the services of the petitioner till disposal of the writ petition. It is stated that inspite of the said order the respondents did not assign any work to the petitioner. Even so, it is not a case of terminating petitioner, besides the petitioner has already filed Civil Application No.2810 of 2004 for clarification of order passed by this court. In that application, similar grievance has been made. It is fairly accepted by the counsel for the petitioner that if 2 the said application was to be decided in favour of the petitioner, nothing will survive in the present petition. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue remedy which is already invoked by the petitioner in the nature of civil application or such other remedy as may be permissible by law. All questions in that behalf are left open. 3. Notice issued to respondents stands discharged.