WP(C) 413/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PK MUSAHARY Heard Mr. S Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. B Sarma, learned Senior Standing Counsel, Central Excise Department, appearing on behalf of the respondents. It is submitted, on behalf of the petitioner, that the petitioner had fi led this writ petition challenging the order, dated 06-10-2010, passed, in Origi nal Application No. 251 of 2010, by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Guwahati, dismissing the application, whereby the petitioner had impugned the m emorandum of charges, which had laid the foundation for disciplinary proceeding against the petitioner. During the pendency of the writ petition, the respondent s have already acted upon the findings of the enquiry report and penalty has bee n accordingly imposed. The penalty has been challenged by an original applicatio n, which has given rise to OA No. 37 of 2011, which is presently pending in the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Guwahati. Appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Sarma, learned counsel for th e petitioner, submits that the petitioner begs to withdraw this writ petition wi th liberty to pursue the original application, which has given rise to OA No. 37 of 2011, and also to file appropriate application(s) seeking interim direction( s) as against the order of penalty, which has been passed by the respondents. To the submissions, so made, no specific objection could be raised by the responde nts. On considering the matter in its entirety, we are of the view that it wo uld be in the interest of justice if we allow the petitioner to withdraw this wr it petition with liberty to pursue his original application aforementioned and a lso to seek appropriate interim relief(s) by way of interlocutory application(s) and if such an application is made, the learned Tribunal shall consider and dis pose of the same expeditiously. In the result and for the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is hereb y disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to pursue his original application aforementioned and also to seek appropriate interim relief( s) by way of interlocutory application(s) and if such an application is made, th e learned Tribunal shall consider and dispose of the same expeditiously.