IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6794 of 2010. Decided on: 28th October, 2010. Satish Aumta. .….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. …. .. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “(i) That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued directing the respondents to adjust the petitioner suitably in view of their assurance. (ii) That the respondent No.1 may kindly be directed to take the decision in view of the recommendation made by respondent No.3 as well as Professor and Head Biochemistry Department, IGMC and Principal, IGMC, Shimla.” 2. There will be a direction to the first respondent to look into the matter and take appropriate action in the light of the recommendation made by the Director, Medical Education, Principal and Professor and Head of the Bio-Chemistry Department etc. and undertaking as referred to in the sponsorship Certificate, Annexure P-2 within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. 2 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 28th October, 2010 (Justice V.K. Sharma), (tr) Judge.