;-<A ^^?.':^'^?':^r'^:^^^?^^ 'eTO i'rnWw"m"Anw,A,m4)-< asaiSBK ^%meff^ia@gs3%-::';ffi .e3"'K^Sg^^teiS ,®;^MK':,fiM te(iEicliaHdrap"¥aSaw? SyiBS*E^j? ^n.^.^^^^'^ii^S^.^ ^' :A IELEAR'r'l'::::'i:';:'''l:-.~l;'-'.'"'!""!":3 :^^M^^./ap:^K|:^,4::;:;..,»S ':..-.liu*k'r'^;.''A^'u'')".''::?^1' 'wl'll^^'^^^'' .''l:!:'^^:i:;^^ ^^ years» li^a at^ ^Ba^^^^^ (BKaaTapali), PS, ^ B^tt.i3|Vjba(G.G.} "IS^O;^E>€ U? E,;'"^effi Q'yieass^lsyov:\^8gs'^ :'a[gaBai'^ 's''FaBasa'3;;®aBit'Bis:t:t£ fi ^as>l3UGan;fe (£)rtwer^^,=@f;;..-''t:he \®licle) rssigSSMa sS eSSS:S.W gE!gEgign§B©iBBBE^i .isfB^^sS^^SSff^S&S^S^S^Kj^''^' HIGHCOUItTOiP^CHHATTISGARHiBILASPUR M. A, (GtNo. 39_of2QQ9 Appellant ~ Ramchandra.Yadav Versus • . Respondents , Tar M6hamm.ad & ariother APPEAU^NE)ERSEC;TIONt730I''3HEMOTORVEHICLESACT. 1988) DB: Hon'ble Shri I. M. Quddusi Ss, Hon't3leS]M-iG'.Muihajuddiri,JJ Shri K. Kalatnkar, Ad'roeatefortheapgeIIahf. ShriMukesh Sharina, Aiivocatelor fhe respondent No. 1 Shri Vila-ant Sirtgh, AdvoGafe for the respQtident No. 2. ORDERfQrall . ^I3ass^on;tIa.is5tiI^ayof,Jyly, 1201:1 ) °Pe»:;I.KM.s^jiiidtU*si,^;y,^?'i'-^ I. ;j This appeal has been fited, By uapugned.award dated 10.11.2008, Ipass^d. ^by the (gomniissioner ibr Werlaneit Ccirnpensation, ^ in Case Np. 9/W^.A.c^20Q^dismis^gtheclaimpetition. :p-i !f h 'i.. W^ h^e heardlearaett eounsel app perused the lower 'Court recoFd. as well as the findings given; in the impugnedaward; • ' 3. The brief faGts, ^in nutsheU, as projected , byi the injured/claimant/appellant eire that he was.worKing as diiiver 6f the vehk;le, bearing^registration Noi C.G. IO-C/1069, whieh was owned by the non-applieantNo.lCI^rMohamrriad). On26.|1-;20Q7 when he was goiag froiri^viyage—Pondi t& Madw^ ori thesway near village - Noonera Dipika road, at about l.00 p.rn., the'jveKiGlg, turiied turtle. As a result of this accideht the clamiant^ reeeiveti 4. various injuries and he sustained peiTnanent disability on his wrist'portion of the right.haflLd. Ttierefoi-e, fhe appellant' filed a claim case underSection 10 of the Workmen^ CpmpensationAct, 1923 fbr award ofa total compertsatidn ofRs. 5,00,OQO/-. The Commissioner, having regaj^ tp the facts situation a^ the .eyidenGe on record, dismiSsgti the Glaim petition fihding that the clmmanf himselfwas rasteand^negligent in drivi^ He ^yas driying the vehk:le in drunken state and hewas using the vehicle fbr carrying passengers, although if was a light carriage veUicle.. : :..' , ; • '• , ' " . Having Iieard learned eciua^t^appearing for fhe parfi^ regarS fp^the iaCts'sifQatjan^dffle ^ .fijMi a^.p^ei-sifx^^fflegality irfc the iiinpugned award. It is riot ex^ei3tS^^om:^^:^ecaf>tgy^^\^ woi-k on ,his .own, negligeht^ahd rashly, agamst ffie ethi^ajld^^n has done so, it was totalfy his risk, fbr which the employericannot be heldresponsible. In view ofthe'atove, we do not find any' subslan^ aroBeal, whicKyis.lia^Ie io t>e and isihereby;disiniss^ tOcQStSi Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge .' Sd/-^-' G. Minhajuddin Judge