e''ff 1\. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH Coram : HON'BLE SHRIRAJEEV GUPTA.C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. PETITIONER t RESPONDENT W.P. (P.I.L.t No. 1483 of 2007 Ashok Bhutda, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.). Versus The Divistonal Railway Manager, South East Central Raihway, Raipur & another. Letter Petition Present: Shri Amit Choudhary, learned Standing Counsel forthe Raiiways. ORDER (1st July, 2008) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: This petition came to be r^istered on the letter sent by one - Ashok Bhutda projecting the grievances of the passengers travelling in E.M.U. between Dongargarh and Bilaspur about the non-availability of toilet facility in this train. 2. The Raihways in their couhter affidavit and supplementary counter affidavit have stated that the Railway Board took the decision to dispense with toilet facility in those local trains in which the journey time is less than four hours and the distance covered is upto160Kms. 3. In view of the categoriGstand taken by Bie Railways in their counter affidavit, we are of the opinion that no further monitoring of the matter in this writ petition, now, is required. 4. The writ petition, thus, stands disposed of. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge nmmi