Criminal Misc.-M 21835 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M 21835 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 2.8.2011 Sarwan Singh @ Kaka .. Petitioner v. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Luvinder Sofat, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that FIR was got registered five days after the alleged incident. No medical-examination was got conducted. The complainant himself admits in the complaint that he recognised only the petitioner as there was some dispute of the petitioner with the brother of the complainant. In fact, this is the reason for falsely implicating the petitioner in this case, otherwise the story projected in the FIR is not plausible. The complainant had allegedly gone on receipt of a call from some lady that he has to sign some documents for getting visa for going to UK. Firstly, he was called near Guru Nanak Dev Hospital and then he was diverted to come to Hanuman Mandir bye-pass, which is not possible as the documents if required to be signed, could be in some office and not on road side. Learned counsel for the State submitted that there are call Criminal Misc.-M 21835 of 2011 [2] details linking the complainant with the lady who had called him. The FIR was not registered for five days as the efforts for compromise were being made. However, he submitted that the complainant has not furnished any information or document to the Investigating Officer showing that he ever applied for any visa for going to UK. He has not even submitted copy of his passport to the Investigating Officer. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts as stated above; apparently there being some enmity between the parties as is evident from the FIR itself and the manner and the purpose for which the complainant was called by a lady, who otherwise is not known to the complainant, for signing of certain documents for obtaining visa to go to UK, firstly near Guru Nanak Dev Hospital and then at Hanuman Mandir bye-pass, in my opinion, the petitioner deserves the concession of pre-arrest bail. Let the petitioner appear before the Investigating Officer on 11.8.2011 at 10.00 A.M. In case of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. He shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. He shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 2.8.2011 mk