HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU WRIT PETI'HON (S) No. 2304 of2008 PETITIONER RES?0NDENTS Smt. Surmiia Bai Netam Age about 40 years, W/o Late Suna Ram Netam Rm Viliage — Bansagax, Post Amoda, Tahsil Narharpur, Digit. — Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS ’ Chairman, Chhatiisgarh Siate Electricity Board, Dmaganiya, Raipur, Dim. Raipur (C,G.) 2. Executive Engineer (O & M) Chhattisgarh State Electricity B05311, Kanker Distt. Kanker (C.G.) 3. State of Chhattisgarh Through — Principal Secretary, Department of 1’0wer and Energy D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board, Through — The Secretaxy, Shakti Bhawan, Jabaipur, (MR) WRIT PETITION UNDER AR'HCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Shri Y.K.Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.S.Gaharwar, Advo‘cate for the respondent No. 1 and 2. Shri P.K.Bhaduri. Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.3. Hesent'. ORAL 0mm (Passed on 27‘5 day Gr June, 2008‘) v.1. Learned counsel appearing for the yetitioner submits that the petitioner has made an application on 30 th 'Jui I, 2007 (Annexere P/l) on aceoant of death of her husband on 3 1.08. 1999. Learned counsel further submits that the said application has not been decided as yet. 2. Shri Gabarwar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents-Clihattisgarh State Electricity Board, submits that the appiication shail be decideci in accordance with the policy and law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks. 3. In View ofthe clear and categorical statement made by Shn' Gaharwar, according l to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this matter. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge l l l l l R