IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 5016 of 2008 Between: Mattapalli Sanjeeva Rao S/o. Veerraju Tilak Street, Kakinada E.G.District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House officer, I Town P.S., Kakinada Town, E.G.District 2 The District Superintendent of Police, Kakinada Town, E.G.District 3 The State of Andhra pradesh, rep.by its Principle Secretary Department of Home, Secretariat, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue order/s or direction/s or by issuing appropriate writ more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not filing the report/charge sheet in the crime No.122 of 2006 pending on the file of III Additional Judicial First class Magistrate, at Kakinada as arbitrary, and illegal, and consequently direct the respondents herein to take appropriate action against the accused therein as per law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.DEVI KISHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the cause in this writ petition does not survive and the same has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 21st August, 2008. GRR