IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42131 of 2007 1. KAMAR IMAM @ MISTER, SON OF HASAN IMAM. 2. HASAN IMAM, SON OF LATE ALI IMAM. 3. HUSNO BANO, WIFE OF HASAN IMAM. ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-JAGDISPUR, P.S. JAGDISHPUR, DISTRICT-BHOJPUR. …………………………………………………………PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR……………………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 3. 18.12.2008. Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Roy, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners who happen to be the husband and parents- in-law of the complainant have prayed for the quashing of the order dated 17.7.2007 passed by Sri J.M. Sharma, the learned Sessions Judge, Buxar, in Criminal Revision No.61 of 2007, whereby he has confirmed the order dated 26.3.2007 passed by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in Complaint Case No.118(C) of 2003, whereby he has rejected the petition for discharge filed by the petitioners. The Magistrate for cogent reasons has refused to discharge the petitioners and the learned Sessions Judge also for cogent reasons has rejected the prayer of the petitioners to set aside the order of the learned Magistrate. It would appear from the concurrent finding of facts of two courts below , a second revision even in the garb of Section 204 Cr.P.C. is barred under Section 397(2) Cr.P.C. unless the orders of the - 2 - court below are apparently illegal or improper or perverse or appears to be an abuse of the process of the court. None of the situations aforesaid arise in this application so as to interfere with the impugned orders. Accordingly, I find no merit in this application which is dismissed. P.S. (Abhijit Sinha,J)