GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION NO. 104 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 104 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 104 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 7808 OF 2003 PETITION NO. 7808 OF 2003 PETITION NO. 7808 OF 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri A.V.Anturkar for the petitioner. Shri R.M.Patne AGP for the State. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.M. V.M. V.M. KANADE, JJ. KANADE, JJ. KANADE, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 11TH MARCH, 2005 11TH MARCH, 2005 11TH MARCH, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By this petition review of our order dated 7-4-2004 is sought. It is also submitted that the order is to be recalled as there is obvious error peeping in the order. 2. The order discloses that there is no error in the order passed by the Tribunal and necessary reasoning is given that during the pendency of the application the petitioner was promoted, and therefore there is no reason to interfere. That reason may be wrong. But that does not change our other reasons for not interfering with the order of Administrative Tribunal. Hence review petition is rejected. ....