IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.27316 of 2010 1. KUMAR RAHUL 2. Ram Pramod Thakur Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 09.02.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application of petitioner no.1, inasmuch as during the pendency of the application he has been arrested. Such permission is accorded. Accordingly, the application of petitioner no.1 is dismissed as withdrawn. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner no.2 and learned counsel for the State. It is a case in which informant’s motorcycle is snatched by Rahul and others including this petitioner. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that even informant is not stating about petitioner’s involvement in snatching of motorcycle as he is stating perhaps Rahul was accompanied by this petitioner also and in further statement not naming this petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, prayer of the petitioner no.2 is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 58 of 2010 above named petitioner no.2 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Muzaffarpur subject to the 2 conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)