IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:14.12.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.24320 of 2010 Sengodan ... Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration Coimbatore. 2.The District Registrar Office of the District Registrar Erode. 3.The District Revenue Officer (Stamps) Office of the District Revenue Officer(Stamps) Coimbatore District. 4.The Sub-Registrar Office of the Sub-Registrar, Sathyamangalam, Erode District. 5.Komarapalayam Panchayat Rep by its President Komarapalayam, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District. 6.Ranga Naicker 7.B.Sarojini 8.V.Jeyanthi 9.K.Sumathi ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus, directing the 1 st and 2nd respondent to consider the representation dated 19.06.2009 given by the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Emily Venkatesan For Respondents : Mr.S.Gopinathan (R1 to R5) Additional Government Pleader https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed praying for a writ of Mandamus, to direct the first and the second respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 19.06.2009. He had prayed that the registered Sale Deed executed in favour of the respondents 7, 8 and 9 is to be cancelled. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 5. 3.In view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and in view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the respondents 1, 2 and 4, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner has not shown sufficient cause or reason to grant the relief, as prayed for by the petitioner in the present Writ Petition. 4.From the representation, dated 19.06.2009, it is clear that the petitioner seeks the cancellation of the registered Sale Deed said to have executed by the sixth respondent, in favour of the respondents 7 to 9. Such a relief cannot be granted by the respondents 1 to 4. Hence, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. However, it is made clear that it would be open to the petitioner to raise the issues arising for the consideration of this Court, before the appropriate civil forum, in the manner known to law. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar arr To 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration Coimbatore. 2.The District Registrar Office of the District Registrar Erode. 3. The District Revenue Officer (Stamps) Office of the District Revenue Officer(Stamps) Coimbatore District. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. The Sub-Registrar Office of the Sub-Registrar, Sathyamangalam, Erode District. 5. The President Komarapalayam Panchayat Komarapalayam, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District 1 cc To The Government Pleader, SR.89575. Writ Petition No.24320 of 2010 MBS(CO) RVL 05.01.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/