IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3043 of 2011 VIKAS PATEL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Admittedly, the marriage of petitioner had taken place with deceased in the year 2002, and according, to prosecution case, deceased was murdered in the year 2009. It further appears from the written report of the informant that the deceased had given birth to a child after her married, so the aforesaid circumstance clearly suggests this fact that the deceased was leading her married life happily and peacefully before her death. It is not clear from perusal of the First Information Report as to how informant got message of death of his daughter. On the other hand, the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the informant was properly informed about the death of deceased, and subsequently, informant participated in cremation of the deceased, but after that he lodged the present case. It would appear from perusal of impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge that in 2 course of investigation, witnesses stated that deceased died of diarrhea, and furthermore, prescription of doctor of Areraj Referral Hospital was also collected by the I.O. It would appear from Annexure-3 to this application that the in-laws of the deceased have already been granted bail by another bench of this Court vide order dated 11.01.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No.970 of 2011. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances and on the basis of above stated discussions, let the petitioner, namely, Vikas Patel be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Gobind ganj (Areraj) P.S. Case No.163 of 2009. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)