IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 17031 of 2008 Between: 1 Rajamma W/o T. Venkataswamy Laxmipuram Village, Agali mandal, Anantapur District. 2 Laxmamma W/o Srinivas Laxmipuram Village, Agali mandal, Anantapur District. 3 Mahalaxmamma W/o Timmarayappa Laxmipuram Village, Agali mandal, Anantapur District. 4 Dasappa S/o Late Era Timmappa Laxmipuram Village, Agali mandal, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The District Collector/Executive Director, A.P. State Housing Corporation Limited, Anantapur District. 2 The District Manager, A.P. State Housing Corporation Limited, Anantapur District. 3 The Tahasildar, Agali mandal, Anantapur district. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities herein in assigningand allotting house sites and houses under "Indiramma Scheme" to the people of other category in the land measuring (2 Acres and 25 Cents) exclusively acquired for the sake of providing house sites to the scheduled castes people under "20 Point programme Scheme" way back in 1976 in Survey No. 126/2 of Laxmipuram Village H/o. Inagaluru, Agali Mandal, Anantapur as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjust, unfair and consequently direct the respondent authorities especially the 1st respondent herein to assign and allot the house sites and houses in the above said survey Nol (i.e, 126/2) of the Laxmipuram Village to the petitioners herein and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.Y.SRIRANGA KARUNAKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.B.UDAYA BHASKAR The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 17031 of 2008 Oral Order: The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to ﬁle fresh writ petition if so advised. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted as sought. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 27-08-2008 pvks