IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7309 of 2011 1. RAM NARAYAN MANDAL 2. ANANT MUKHIYA 3. DEVENDRA MANDAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 07.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners are not named in the first information report but learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Supaul has mentioned in his impugned order that at Paragraph Nos. 6, 79 and 80 of the case diary, witnesses have claimed to have identified the petitioners at the time of alleged occurrence. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners points out that petitioners have not been named by the witnesses in the aforesaid paragraphs and, as a matter of fact, for the first time the name of these petitioners came in supervision note of S.D.P.O. It is also pointed out by him that one named accused Mahendra Ram as well as one co-accused Deenanath Sah have already been granted privilege of bail by another Bench of this Court. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Birpur, District-Supaul in connection with Kunauli P.S. Case No. 03 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )