1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7042 OF 2010 Suraj Ramesh Parmar ........Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & anr.........Respondent. Ms. Gauri godse adv. for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. CORAM: B. R. GAVAI,J. DATED : 6th September, 2010. P.C.: 1. The limited grievance of the petitioner is that though the application has been filed by the petitioner before the learned Member, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, the same has not been decided. It is apparent that if the interim order is not granted by the learned MRT, the SDO may proceed with the auction of the property in question. 2. This petition can be disposed of with a direction to the MRT to decide the application filed by the present petitioner for interim relief within a period of four weeks from today and till then the respondents are directed to maintain status quo of the property in question. The petition therefore stands disposed of with aforesaid direction. (B. R. GAVAI, J.) 2