IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. No. 9142 of 2011. Decided on: 20.10.2011. Narender Paul. ….. Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and others. …… Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner. : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “(A) That a writ of mandamus may kindly be issued and directing the respondents to include the name of the petitioner in the seniority list of +2 passed peon list and as per his seniority promoted on the post of Clerk. (B) That the respondents may kindly be directed to grant all consequential benefits after granting seniority to the petitioner.” 2. It is seen that the representation, Annexure P-4 filed by the petitioner is pending before the second respondent. There will be a direction to the second respondent to look into Annexure 2 P-4, representation and take appropriate action in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment alongwith copy of the writ petition, by the petitioner. 3. With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 20, 2011. (bhupender)