IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5876 of 2010 1. ARUN KUMAR PANDEY 2. OM PRAKASH PANDEY--------PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 17.5.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing for the State. Petitioners were granted anticipatory bail by the Court below in Complaint case No. 1389C/2007. Due to some family disturbance, petitioners could not surrender before the Court below; as such they filed fresh application for anticipatory bail for extending the period for surrender. The Sessions Judge did not extend the period and rejected their prayer. Considering the allegation in the First Information Report, which according to the petitioners, is non-existent and also that the petitioners were earlier granted anticipatory bail, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioners above named is allowed. In the event of their arrest/surrender within four 2 weeks from today in the Court below, petitioners shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Bhojpur at Ara in Complaint case No. 1389C of 2007, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar