IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12419 of 2009 1. SARYUG MAHTO,son of late Govind Mahto 2. Janki Devi,w/o Saryug Mahto Both resident of village-Surauli, P.S.-Bibhutipur,Dist.-Samastipur. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 23-04-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that for the differences in between the victim with her husband petitioners have been made accused in the case making allegation for the offences under Sections 328, 307 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code but that also is not corroborated by the victim while she appeared in court to get herself examined, even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest, which never can be justified in my view also. Accordingly, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Bibhutipur P.S.Case No.145/2005, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Rosera (Samastipur), subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )