IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21305 of 2010 ISHTEYAQUE ALI @ SHER ALI, S/o Late Haidar Ali. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 28.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 3 of the R.P. (U.P.) Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner was arrested from the place of occurrence where the alleged seizure was made but the seizure was not from his conscious possession nor does he have any criminal antecedent. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named who is in custody since 25.02.2010 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Sasaram R.P.F. Case No. 6 of 2010 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the 2 brother/wife of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)