IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR WJC No 518 of 2011 Anju Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 2 02.08.2011 Though this writ petition purports to be a writ of habeas corpus, we are satisfied, it is not so. The petitioner, from her first marriage, which lasted hardly a year, the husband meeting unfortunate death, has a daughter. After about 7 years of the death of the first husband, it appears she married another person totally outside the family and moved out with the daughter from the first husband. The father and the mother of the first husband, being the paternal grand parents of the child, have now taken away the child under their care and she has been sent to Delhi with their relations. Petitioner claims custody of the child. Later, before this Court, she has limited her prayer with regard to visitation. In our view, the forum for her in this regard is before the Family Court, if she is so advised, to take necessary steps under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956. This writ application is thoroughly misconceived and is dismissed as such. M.E.H./ (Navaniti Prasad Singh) (Ashwani Kumar Singh)