IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.983 of 2009 Gaya Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 2. 28.06.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. Advertisement No. 1 of 2004 was published for appointment on the post of Grade IV Peon. A panel is stated to have been prepared on 27.1.2005. Irregularities in the panel led to writ applications. The grievance of the petitioner is that his name has not been included in the panel. He is registered with the Employment Exchange. The writ application makes out no legal ground calling for any interference much less asking the respondents to file a counter affidavit. An application submitted in response to an advertisement does not automatically vest a right to empanelment much less appointment. All these remain subject to scrutiny of the application. No illegality has been alleged in the writ application warranting interference. The writ application stands dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)