IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18540 of 2008 Between: Sri Babu Narsimha Swamy S/o.Kanakaiah H.No.7-9 Shayampet(V) &(M) Warangal District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Hon'ble Industrial Tribunal Cum-Labour Court Godavarikhani Rep.by its Presiding Officer 2 Secretary To Govt Irregation Deparment CAD Department (I&CAD) Secretariat Hyderabad 3 Executive Engineer I/C (I&CAD) Division No.4 Godavari Valley Circle- IV) L.M.D Colony Karimnagar,Karimnagar District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ order or direction more particular one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent not passing award as required under Section 14,15 17 of I.D act illegal arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 1st respondent to pass an award in I.D No.55/2005 basing upon the material evidence on record and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following : O R D E R: 1. This Writ Petition has been filed by Basani Narasimha Swamy- petitioner assailing the action of 1st respondent-Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Godavarikhani in not passing orders in I.D.No.55 of 2005. 2. The petitioner raised industrial dispute by filing an application before the 1st respondent. The learned Tribunal entertained the dispute as I.D.No.55 of 2005. It appears the petitioner once filed a memo informing the Tribunal of his taking steps to transfer the proceedings. Subsequently the petitioner requested the Tribunal to dispose of the said I.D. The proceedings are pending before the Tribunal for filing memo by the petitioner. The proceedings sheet dated 21.7.2008 reads as under: “ For filing memo on petitioner side to dispose of the case, otherwise take steps for transfer the case. Petitioner present. His counsel absent. Respdt. Side A.G.P., absent and no representation. For filing memo on petitioner side to dispose of the case, otherwise take steps for transfer the case, petitioner requested time for one month. PNR, TE, call on.” 3. When the matter came up for admission learned Assistant Government Pleader for Irrigation takes notice on behalf of R2 and R3. 4. Heard both sides. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is prepared to file a memo before the 1st respondent-Tribunal to proceed with the hearing in I.D.No.55 of 2005. 6. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider the memo to be filed by the petitioner and proceed with the enquiry in I.D.No.55 of 2005 and pass appropriate orders within two months. No costs. 19th January 2009. (B.Seshasayana Reddy,J) tnb ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{BMR} THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.18540 OF 2008 19TH JANUARY 2009.