IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.186 of 2009 RAM KUMAR SINGH & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 26.3.2010. Sri Ashutosh Kumar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has attempted to place before me the prospective defence of the petitioner which could be suggested to different witnesses and which could be considered and appreciated by marshaling of facts by the learned trial Judge. The Supreme Court has put a complete bar on marshaling of facts while considering a petition of the present nature and at the same time it was pointing out that even if the accused had a strong defence it may not be a ground for quashing the proceeding. Likewise, the Supreme Court observed that the consideration that the case may end in an acquittal in all probability may also not be a ground for quashing the prosecution or an order of the nature as challenged herein. For the above principles one may refer to AIR 1976 SC 1947 Smt Nagawwa Vrs. Veeranna Shivalingappa Koljalgi & Ors. Petition is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )