1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.1395 OF 2004 Shri Sahadu Dagadu Tapkir & Anr. : Petitioners V/s. Shri Mahadu Dagadu Tapkir & Ors. : Respondents ... R.K.Saroj i/b. Mr.S.V.Pitre for the petitioners. ... CORAM : S.A. BOBDE, J. March 22, 2005. P.C.: The petitioners challenge the order dated 24.3.2003 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune, upholding the orders of the authorises below in making a mutation entry in favour of the respondents. The revisional authority has upheld those orders on the basis of perusal of the evidence and in particular the documentary evidence in regard to the disputed land. In fact, the respondents admitted the petitioners’ claim except in respect of gat no.798. It is settled law that mutation entries are meant only for fiscal purposes and do not confer or divest title in the property. The petitioners would certainly be at liberty 2 to take appropriate steps for asserting their title and/or possession, if threatened. There is no merit in the petition which is hereby dismissed. Sd/- S.A. BOBDE, J.