IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8849 of 2007 Baiju Pd.Yadav, Son of Late Chhedi Pd. Yadav, resident of Village- Vijaynagar, P.S. Banka, District-Banka ------------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Electricity Board, through of Chairman, Vidyut Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna 2. The General Manager-cum- Chief Engineer, Bhagalpur Electric Supply Area, Bhagalpur 3. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Bhagalpur 4. A.G. Bihar,Patna --------------------- Respondents. ----------- 02 22-06-2011 Sri L.P.K. Rajgrihar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent no.4/ Accountant General,Bihar, Patna submits that the Office of the Accountant General has got no role to play in the present case. Accordingly, the name of Accountant General, Bihar, Patna/ Respondent no.4 is deleted from the record of the case. Heard Smt. Praveena Kumari Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vijay Kumar Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent nos.1 to 3/ Bihar State Electricity Board. In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for directing the Respondents to make payment of entire retiral dues. During the course of hearing, it was submitted by Sri Vijay Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the Bihar State Electricity Board that all the retiral dues have already been paid to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the fact since, it was submitted, she is not in contact with the client. In view of the stand taken by the learned counsel for the Bihar State Electricity Board, there is no need to keep the matter further pending. 2 The writ petition stands disposed of with an indication that if any grievance of the petitioner still exists, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file a representation before Respondent no.2/ General Manager-cum- Chief Engineer, Bhagalpur Electric Supply Area, Bhagalpur. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, Respondent no.2 is directed to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievance of the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J. )