THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA MONDAY THE FIFTH DAY OF OCTOBER, TWO THOUSAND AND NINE W.P.No. 21094 OF 2009 Between: Nalarapu Seetha Ramulu …Petitioner A n d The State of A.P., Rep. By its Secretary Revenue ( Endowments) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad and another …Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA W.P.No. 21094 OF 2009 ORDER: The matter is coming up for admission. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Endowments takes notice on behalf of Respondents 1 and 2. 2. This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing a Notification bearing No. II/35063/2009, dated 30-7-2009 as premature, arbitrary and illegal and violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and pass such other suitable orders. 3. It is the case of the writ petitioner that Sri Anantha Padmanabha Swamy Temple, Ananthagiri village is an ancient temple and in existence from the times immemorial. The petitioner was recognized as Member founder’s family of Sri Anantha Padmanabha Swamy Temple, Ananthagiri village vide Proceedings R.Dis.No.C/2420/96, dated 2-9-1996 by the Assistant Commissioner of Endowments. Against the said order the Joint Commissioner MZIII Endowments Department, Hyderbad has taken up suo –moto revision in R.P.in R.C.No. 85/2000 and upheld the order of the Assistant Commissioner. 4. It is also stated that the petitioner made a representation before the Commissioner of Endowments on 2-3-2009 seeking exemption to the subject temple from the constitution of trust board. 5. It is further stated that the respondents have now issued notice R.C.No.II/35063/2009, dated 30-7-2009 proposing to constitute board of trustees and calling for application for trusteeship from the interested persons ignoring and avoiding to mention about the Petitioner’s right. 6. It is stated that the representation of the petitioner, dated 2-3- 2009 is pending before the 2nd Respondent. 7. In the light of the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the considered opinion that the writ petition be disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the representation dated 2- 3-2009, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks, till the appropriate decision is taken in this regard the respondents shall not to take any further steps relating to constitution of trust board. 8. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. _____________________ Justice P.S.Narayana 5th October,2009. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA W.P.No. 21094 OF 2009 5th October, 2009.