THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY W.P.No.12110 OF 2009 BETWEEN: U. Srinivas, S/o. Rama Rao …Petitioner and The District Cooperative Officer, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Cooperative Department, R.R.Pet, Eluru, West Godavari District and two others … Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY W.P.No.12110 OF 2009 ORDER: Heard both sides. 2. The relief claimed in the writ petition is for a direction to declare the impugned action of the respondents, particularly, third respondent in trying to dismiss the petitioner from service without any enquiry and any opportunity of being heard and also action of the second respondent in not considering the telegraphic representation of the petitioner dated 15.06.2009 in view of the urgency and initiating any action against the third respondent without following the due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.06.2009 and cause proper enquiry against the third respondent society and also direct the third respondent to cause proper and independent enquiry by providing an opportunity of being heard taking any coercive action against the petitioner and for such other reliefs. 3. Thus, several things are mentioned in the relief portion. It is not disputed that the petitioner is already removed from service. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the representation, dated 15.06.2009, telegraphically submitted by the petitioner may be considered. In the present situation, as the petitioner is already removed from service, other than allowing the prayer for considering his representation, dated 15.06.2009, perhaps, nothing else can be granted. 4. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 15.06.2009 and pass appropriate orders, within a period of three months from today. It is made clear that the petitioner is at liberty to take any further steps after consideration of the representation or even before that, in view of his removal subsequent to filing of this writ petition. No costs. ___________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. 9th October 2009 Rns