IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 12TH MARCH 2009 / 21ST PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 84 of 2009(I) ------------------------------- PETITIONER : ----------------------- K.VASU, KUTTIYIL HOUSE VETTOM PO., TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SWATHI KUMAR RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM. 2. VETTOM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VETTOM PO., TIRUR TALUK. 3. KUTTIYIL DIVAKARAN, PRESIDENT, VETTOM CHERPU TMC. SCHEME, R/AT.KUTTIYIL VETTOM PO., TIRUR TALUK. 4. K.C.MOHAMED KUTTY @ BAVA SECRETARY, VETTOM-CHERPU T.M.C. SCHEME, VETTOM PO. ADV. SRI.JOBY JACOB PULICKEKUDY FOR R2 SRI.ANIL GEORGE FOR R2 SMT. M.R. SREELATHA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER\ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 84 /2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE SCHEME TRANSFER MEMORANDUM. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 16/01/2008 IN WPC NO.859/08. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 4/04/2008 IN WPC NO.859/2008 OF THIS HON'BL COURT. EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. G5.20011/2008 DATED 19/06/2008 OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDR NO. G5.20011/08 DATED 7/08/2008 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ PA. TO JUDGE scm ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 84 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 12th day of March, 2009 JUDGMENT Implementation of Exhibit P5 is what is sought for in this writ petition. Exhibit P5 is an order passed by the first respondent, directing respondents 3 and 4 to ensure that drinking water is made available from Vettom Cherpu TMC Drinking Water Scheme to the petitioner and others, who are covered by said order. Despite service of notice, there is no appearance on behalf of respondents 3 and 4. Counsel appearing for the Panchayat submits that it is for the 3rd respondent to implement Exhibit P5. From Exhibit P5 also, it is evident that respondents 3 and 4 are to implement the order. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondents 3 and 4 to implement Exhibit P5, an order passed by the District Collector to the above effect. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible . It is directed that if the petitioner has any complaint regarding the implementation of Exhibit P5, it will be open to the petitioner to move the first respondent, in which case, needful shall be done by the first respondent. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE scm