1 69.11 SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.69 OF 2011 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.97 OF 2009 Mr.Rakesh Jagdish Shah ...Applicant Versus Ms.Sapana Shah & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.R.M.Pethe for applicant. Mr.V.Mannadiar i/b Mannadiar & Co. for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED:- MAY 6, 2011. P.C. 1. The respondent No.2 has made over demand draft for a sum of Rs.Five Lakhs drawn in favour of Master Yatharth R.Shah. The same has been directly handed over to the applicant which position is accepted by the Counsel for the applicant. In the circumstances, nothing survives for consideration in this application. Application disposed of. 2. Insofar as applicant’s claim for recovery of interest from the respondent No.2, if any, the applicant would be free to pursue such other 2 69.11 remedy as may be permissible by law. All questions in that behalf are left open. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)