1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23/09/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.JYOTHIMANI Writ Petition (MD)No.10857 of 2011 M/s.Arasan Soap Works Represented by its Managing Partner T.Lenin Keelkulam Kanyakumari District. ...Petitioner Vs The Commercial Tax Officer Kuzhithurai. ...Respondent Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent in TNGST No.6182407/2005-06 dated 30.09.2010 and quash the dame as illegal, arbitrary and direct the respondent to pass fresh assessment order after furnishing the copies of the D7 records after affording an opportunity of being heard personally. For Petitioner ...Mr.S.Karunakar For respondents ...Mr.TR.Janarthanam Government Advocate O R D E R On the face of it, the writ petition is misconceived. The revised order of assessment came to be passed by the respondent as early as on 03.09.2010. However, the petitioner has chosen to file this writ petition challenging the revised order after more than one year. It is not even the case of the petitioner that the respondent has no jurisdiction to pass revised order. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of latches. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Writs) /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To The Commercial Tax Officer, Kuzhithurai. +1 CC to the Special Government Pleader, SR.No.33102 +2 CC to Mr.S.Karunakar, Advocate, SR.No.33345 & 32912 RR Writ Petition No.10857 of 2011 23.09.2011 TR : 18.10.2011 : 1P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/