IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12961 of 2007 Sohan Sah, son of late Lal Bahadur Sah, resident of village Bhatha, P.O. Bhatha, P.S. Maker, District Saran (Chhapra) … Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Commissioner Education Primary Patna, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. The District Collector, Saran, Chhapra 3. The Secretary, Education Primary, Patna 4. The District Education Superintendent, Saran 5. The Land Reforms Development Collector, Sadar Chhapra, Saran 6. The Block Development Officer, Maker, Saran 7. The Block Education Officer, Maker, Saran 8. The Mukhiya, Panchayat Bhatha, Saran, Chhapra 9. The Panchayat Secretary cum Panchayat Sewak Bhatha, Saran 10. Sanjay Singh (Untrained) son of Sri Manshi Lal Singh, residence of village & P.O. Bhath, P.S. Maker, Daran 11. Virendra Kumar Singh (untrained) son of Sri Shankar Singh, resident of village Bhatha, P.O. Bhatha, P.S. Maker, District Saran, Chhapra 12. Brajendra Prasad Singh, son of Sri Kishori Prasad, resident of village Fulwariya Keshari Tola, P.O. Fulwariya, P.S. Maker, District Saran 13. Ganesh Sharma (Markes Low & age low) son of Sri Chandrika Sharma, resident of village Rukan Badha, P.O. & P.S. Maker, District Saran, Chhapra … Respondents ---------------------------------- 2. 16.11.2011 Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application in order to enable the petitioner to move the competent District Teachers Appellate Authority with regard to his grievance relating to his own appointment on the post of Panchayat teacher as also illegalities in the selection and appointment of respondents no. 10, 11, 12 and 13. This Court keeping in view of the statutory provisions made under Rule 18 of the Panchayat Appointment Teachers Rules, 2006 would give liberty to the petitioner to file a complaint before the competent District Teachers Appellate Authority which would decide the matter on merits without non- suiting him on the ground of delay and/or limitation, if any. 2 It goes without saying that any order would be passed by the authority only after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as also to the affected respondents no. 10 to 13. This application is, accordingly, permitted to be withdrawn with the aforementioned liberty. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/