IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12565 of 2010 1. PRAMOD SHARMA S/O SRI RAMCHANDRA SHARMA R/O VILL.- KETHARIA, P.S.- DUMARA, DISTT.- SITAMARHI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE MEMBER, DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY, SITAMARHI, DISTT.- SITAMARHI 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SITAMARHI, DISTT.- SITAMARHI 6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SITAMARHI, DISTT.- SITAMARHI 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, DUMARA, DISTT.- SITAMARHI 8. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, DUMARA 9. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, MISRAULIA, P.S.- DUMARA, DISTT.- SITAMARHI 10. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ MISRAULIA, P.S.- DUMARA, DISTT.- SITAMARHI 11. THE HEADMASTER, GOVERNMENT MIDDLE SCHOOL, KETHARIA, P.S.- DUMARA, DISTT.- SITAMARHI ----------- 02. 31.03.2011 It is a misplaced kind of writ application which has been filed by the petitioner, which may have a mischievous value attached with it in the circumstances noted hereinbelow. Anneuxre-1 is the order passed by the Block Development Officer, Dumra asking the petitioner to return all the papers relating to census work because it has come to his notice that the petitioner was not a Panchayat teacher and working in that capacity. Since only teachers services have been utilized for census work, therefore, status of the petitioner being not clear, such a order has been issued. The observation and the background under which 2 the petitioner has been ordered to return the papers is not the subject matter of dispute of the present writ application. So far as direction to the petitioner for returning census papers is concerned, the petitioner should be more than happy because he has been taken of the census work of moving door to door and collocate data. Such removal does not require any interference. Observation of the Block Development Officer whether petitioner is a Panchayat teacher or a Shiksha Mitra, has no meaning because the status of the petitioner would be decided on the basis of the actual state of affairs. There is sufficiency of material and a big question mark on the status even according to the petitioner. The writ application is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)