BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Eleventh day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14634 of 2011 1. ALLI FATHIMAL 2. MOHAMMED NAZAR 3. KADAR BEEVI 4. SAKILA BANU 5. AZHARUDIN 6. MAHAMOOTHAMMAL 7. IBRAHIMSHA 8. SYED ALI FATHIMA ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.2 to 4, 6 to 9 & 12, 13 Vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DIST CR.NO. 07 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. G.MARIAPPAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest, the petitioners, in Crime No.07 of 2011 on the file of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 494, 406 of the Indian Penal Code read with 120(B) and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, have come forward with this Petition seeking for anticipatory bail. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have been implicated in this case on the allegation of demand of dowry and they said to have treated the defacto complainant cruelly. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. 3. I have considered the above submissions. 4. It is seen that the petitioners are the in-laws of the defacto complainant and they have been implicated in this case on the allegation of demand of dowry and causing cruel treatment. Having regard to the above fact, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar, on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner Nos. 1, 3, 4, 6 & 8, shall appear before the respondent police as and when required and the petitioner Nos. 2, 5 and 7 shall appear before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 11/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II VIRUDHUNAGAR 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR 3. INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DIST 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. G.MARIAPPAN Advocate SR.No.39147 GH : 14.11.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14634 of 2011 Date :11/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/