hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL SIDE PIL NO. 15 OF 2009 Mohammad Azam Ansari ... Petitioner Versus Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay ... Respondent Mr. B.V. Holambe Patil for Petitioner. Mrs. Shobha Ajitkumar for R. No. 1. Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleader for R. No Sakhardande with Mr. Palash Dharmadhikari i/by Mr. P.H. Dharmadhikari for R. Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : MARCH 10, 2010 P.C. The matter pertains to illegal constructions. Mr. S.G. Garud has filed an affidavit in which he has pointed out that the suit filed by Respondent No. 2 was dismissed in respect of the subject matter and an appeal was preferred to this court which has been admitted being First Appeal No. 389 of 2002 and stay was granted on 10.4.2002. That appeal is pending. In the light of that in our opinion, it is not possible to entertain the present Petition. However, Respondent Corporation is directed and as and when and if appeal is dismissed to take steps to remove construction according to law. If according to Petitioner, there are any other further constructions, he may complain to Corporation who will act according to Law. With the above observations, Petition disposed of. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)