IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10404/2011-A Decided on:1.12.2011 _____________________________________________ Laiq Ram Rapta. …Petitioner. Versus The H.P. Horticultural Produce Marketing and Processing Corporation. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. S.C. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Avneesh Bhardwaj, Advocate. _____________________________________________________ Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). The petitioner has filed the writ petition with the following prayer: “That the respondent may kindly be directed to pay a sum of 1,011,78/- alongwith an interest @ 12% from 31.3.2010 till realization on account of leave encashment vide Annexure P-2.” 2. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 5380 of 2011, titled Kanha Singh versus The Himachal Pradesh Horticultural Produce 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 & Processing Corporation Limited, decided on 18.10.2011. If that be so, similar treatment shall also be extended to the petitioner herein, as extended to the petitioner in the above referred decision, in case the petitioner is also similarly situated, within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition and the copy of judgment referred to above by the petitioner. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 1.12.2011 *awasthi*