1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM Crl.R.C.No.453 of 2010 Bharath ...Petitioner vs. Parameswari ...Respondent Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code to set aside the order dated 14.10.2008 passed in Cr.M.P.Nos.264 and 265/2008 in M.C.No.25/2006 on the file of the Family Court at Puducherry. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.V.Raghavachari O R D E R From the order sheet it is seen that from June 2010 onwards, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. When the matter was posted on 27.06.2014, there was no representation and therefore, it was directed to be posted today [03.07.2014], under the caption 'For Dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the respondent is present. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non-prosecution. 03.07.2014 2 T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J., gms To 1. Family Court at Puducherry. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Crl.R.C.No.453 of 2010 03.07.2014