(“ Mg) K «3% at ’‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHAITESGARH AT BUASPUR Q) M.C.C. {PR} No. 11 9 (£2008 ‘Petitjner Stet-1 Authority of Indi ypRicant g a? a company constitute , Kegistsred ‘ under Cpanies > Act, 195E, aving its heaxrofe at ohi Ksad, N6W Delhi thmugh its, Manin Diracto, Bhihi Bhilai 6 agg r Stccl Plant, (0..) . Vsus den a Rssponts 1. Srtaj Gera, S/o Shri B. S. Non— (3cm, o 21f11 Ncu agar 'pplicant {East} Nagr. Durg ’ Rj hr N a Bhimi. a District Drg C.G.) u ( econd Addica Dirict S tinl st Judga, Bur District (..} statc OEc, a Swcl Plant, Bhjlai Distct a GJ i Dra (Q ( : onbl Sti K miri SB H’c Shri ash . hot. J.) I N r. . K. Shukla, enior Advocatc with Ms Rim Mishr vocatc for hs psiiiioner. ORAL ORDER (Passai rm this 5th day of August, 20%8) The applicairk has filed this application for mstomtion of WP. No. 2630] 2001 (Stool Authority of india Limited V. Sai‘taj Gsra 3s. others), which was ismiSsod for want of prosecution on 6.2.2008. LA.No. 1 for condomtion of {lalay is ordomd, as prayod for. Loatnod coimsol for tho applicant submits that the coonseL for the petitioner could not appear on 6.2.2008 on account of bonatide mistake, therefore the writ petition may be restored to its tile. Reasonable and .suificient cause as been shown. The writ petition is iestoted to the original file, subject to payment of a cost of Rs. 1000/— by the applicant, to the High Court Legal Aid Committee. A copy of this onier be placed on recom in W. P. No. 2630/ 2001 and the same be listed for hearing. n“_ ' Sd/- wa‘ Satish K.‘ Agnihotri Judge E31 3b p. A d & om h iflc Ld er g Burg CG E cr Bhili E N S a, Ad t h m