- 1 - 16.ss.853.11 skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.853 OF 2011 Dena Bank ..Plaintiff -Versus- Ravindra Narayan Mulya & Ors. Defendants .......... Mr.C.H.Kalambe for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. .......... CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 18TH OCTOBER 2011. P.C. 1 The suit is filed to recover the amount due under a education loan agreement granted by the plaintiff to defendant no.1. Defendant no.2 is the father of defendant no.1 and co-borrower. Defendant no.3 is the guarantor. 2 The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff, on taking instructions from Smt. Madhavi Milind Kulkarni, Chief Manager, Prabhadevi, Mumabi 400 025 seeks to drop defendant no.3. Accordingly, defendant no.3 is dropped. 3 The defendants failed to reply the plaintiff’s advocates’ notice dated 8.09.2010 demanding payment. - 2 - 16.ss.853.11 2 The defendants have not filed an appearance. A compilation of documents is tendered by the plaintiff in Court, is taken on record and marked “X” collectively. 3 There is nothing on record that militates against the plaintiff’s claim. There is no reason not to accept the averments and submissions in the plaint. 4 The suit is, therefore, decreed as prayed. However, interest after the date of the suit shall be at 12% per annum. Costs to be quantified as per Rules. Refund of court fee, if any, as per Rules. -