IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2205/2011 (Madhukar Jairam Chandragiriwar vrs. Yavatmal Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd and others)} ................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................... Shri G.G.Bade.,counsel for petitioner. ... CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 5th MAY, 2011. This petition challenges the order dated 30th June, 2011, passed by the State Government, rejecting the revision filed by the petitioner under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, as not maintainable. The application for review filed before the State Government has also been rejected. Hence, that order is also the subject matter of this petition. The Certificate under Section 101 of the Cooperative Societies Act has been issued by the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies. Under Section 154 of the said Act, the revision is available before the Divisional Joint Registrar and in terms of Section 2A of Section 154 of the Act, 50% of the amount under the certificate is required to be deposited with the Bank. In view of this, no fault can be found with the order passed by the State Government holding that the revision before the State Government is not maintainable. So also, no fault can be found with the order passed on review application. The petitioner is at liabery to file revision before the Divisional Joint Registrar as contemplated by Section 154 of the said Act and also he is at liberty to point out the Divisional Joint Registrar that 50% of the amount covered by the certificate has also been deposited with the respondent Bank after the date of granting of certificate under Section 101 of the said Act. The learned Divisional Joint Registrar shall consider such deposit, if found to be made. With this observations, the petition is dismissed. JUDGE Rvjalit