IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.3115/2007. Hari Narain Gurjar. VERSUS Chhoti Devi & Others. 04.03.2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.D.K.Bhardwaj, for the appellant. Mr.Sandeep Jain, for the respondents. ***** Heard learned counsel for the parties. As required by the third proviso to Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, there is no averment by the appellant that the amount payable has been deposited by the Commissioner and nor is there any certificate appended to the appeal by the appellant in that behalf. This court had on 27.08.2007 permitted the appellant to deposit 25% of the penalty amount with the Registrar (Administration) but even the said amount has not been deposited. In view of the above, this appeal is liable to be dismissed as not maintainable. Consequently, this appeal as well as the stay application are accordingly dismissed. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.