HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 13860 OF 2011 Wednesday, the Fourth Day of May, Two Thousand and Eleven Between Gudipudi Sivaiah Petitioner AND The District Collector, Guntur District, Guntur and others Respondents ORDER: The petitioner claims to be the owner of Ac.0.04 cents of land at Pedakurapadu village and Mandal, Guntur District by virtue of the sale agreement executed evidencing delivery of the property by one Yeddala Palidasu @ Yeddala Palidasu Sadguru, whom he served at his old age. Late Palidasu also handed over the original patta to the petitioner, who wanted to construct a small house in the said property and has dropped some construction material. When the fourth respondent, who is grandson of late Palidasu interfered, the petitioner lodged a complaint with the Station House Officer, Pedakurapadu Police Station, on 15.2.2011. Apart from that he also filed O.S.No. 37 of 2011 seeking permanent injunction before the Principal Junior Civil Judge at Sattenapalli on 23.02.2011, which is pending. While so, on 9.3.2011, the fourth respondent along with others attacked the petitioner’s wife and beat her and thrown her out of the house. In view of the same, the present writ petition is filed. The averments made in the affidavit that the third respondent called the petitioner and warned him is only a ground to maintain the writ petition. On the complaint filed before the police, if no action is taken, the petitioner is always at liberty to move the Magistrate by lodging a private complaint. It is also open to the petitioner to obtain necessary injunction in the suit filed by him against the fourth respondent and seek police protection to protect the property in the event of granting such injunction. In view of the same, the present writ petition filed by impleading the third respondent alleging that he has supported the fourth respondent is nothing but to see that civil dispute is settled, which cannot be entertained. The writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J. 04-05-2011 MAS/SJ