IN THE HIGH BOURT DF JUDIEATURE AT JABALPUR WRIT PETITIDN N01()é(1 OF £000 Qllahabad Bank, a Budy Cmrparate and a Banking Campany Bungtitutad undav the Banking $Qmpania$ (§cqui§itian and Tranafer nf Undertakinga) éct V ofv1970 having it’g He&d Dffice at E? Netaji Subhag Raad, $a1cutta 700 001, and a Branah am$ng$t athEFE at Bila$pur Tawn, Dppagite Qutm Telephmne Exchange, New Bu§~§tand RUad, i PETITIDNER. Eilagpur. —VERSU3- 1n Mfg Eila$pur $a§ting$ Limitad, a Bmm any regi$tered under the Indian Companieg Act, 1956, having its Regigternd Office and Factnry at Q?WA, Eirgitti IndU§tria1 érea, Sirgittig Bilagpur, and Qdministative Office at Cmmmerce {11nd Flmmr), 2 n! Hanegh Hhandra Avenue, Ealmutta — ?DO 013. E. Madhya Pradwgh Financial $nrparatimn, Finance Hnuae,‘ Bambay Agra Raad, Indure. 3. Madhya Pradegh audhymgik Vikaa Nigam, Panchanan, Secnnd Flnor, Malviya Hagar, Bhnpal. 3y Indugtrial Enmplex§ Raipur, M.P. 4. Mia Hi Tech Qbraaiva Ltd., ?4$J1, 8ectar RESPONDENTS umT PETITION mmERAmmLEum awn 221m THE mnTunmwuF; ‘INDIAAFDR =A HRIT IN i‘TIE NATURE gt: rw-ESMUS. ”mun-Rim ETEETC. D£TAIL5 OF PETITION J NAME AND RDDRESS DF’THE PETITIDNER: nn§mw5i $ame aa abnve. V\‘~J Ix k \. ;,,] ) jjIGH COURT OF CHHATIISGARE; BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4069 OF 2000 EjiTITIONER Allahabad Bank Versus M/s Bilaspur Castings Limited & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :— None for the petitioner. RESPONDENTSK ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 18m day or October 2010) iANo 'i This is an appiication for withdrawal of writ petition. 2. it is ordered, as prayed for. 3. i'ixcxgordingly, the writ petition is dismiseed as withdrawn. Consequently, interim order passed earlier stands vacated. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihou'i Judge 5 E yr