((-1-)) hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6358 OF 2006 Smt. Walzade Baby Madhavrao ... Petitioner Versus Sudhagad Education Society and Ors. Respondents Mr. Manish Mistry i/by M.P. Vashi & Associates for Petitioner. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, A.G.P. for R. No. 4. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & S.J. VAZIFDAR,JJ. S.J. VAZIFDAR,JJ. S.J. VAZIFDAR,JJ. DATED: FEBRUARY 05, 2007 DATED: FEBRUARY 05, 2007 DATED: FEBRUARY 05, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . In so far as the order dated 28.8.2006, the learned counsel for the Management on instructions states that they will be withdrawing the said order to comply with the order of this court and issue a fresh order. It is also pointed out that they have filed a petition before this court challenging the order passed by the School Committee and that is pending and that they may be permitted to add a sentences that the appointment will be subject to the order in the Writ Petition. On behalf of the Petitioner it is submitted that there is one more order of transfer dated 15.7.2006. On behalf of the Respondents, it is pointed out that that order no longer survives as the Petitioner is now working in the school in which he will be reinstated. In view ((-2-)) of that order of transfer no longer survives. . In so far as order of reinstatement is concerned, the order dated 28.8.2006 is treated as withdrawn. The respondent to issue fresh order of reinstatement in terms of the order of this court. Liberty to them to add the sentence that it will be subject to final order in the pending writ petition. In so far as the issue regarding wages are concerned, it is pointed out by the Petitioner that order of this court has not been complied with. There is a contempt petition pending. In the light of that we do not propose to pass any order. . With the above observations, Petition disposed of. (S.J. VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)