IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1888 of 2009 Birendra Yadav son of Rajdeep Yadav R/o village Chikni , Tola Yagwani, P.S. Gamharia, Dist. Madhepura…..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Tara Devi wife of Birendra yadav, daughter of Late Chamak Yadav,R/o village Mohanpur P.S. madhepura, Dist. Madhepura. 3. Indrajeet Kumar, father of Sri Birendra Yadav R/o village Chikani Tola Yogbani, P.S. Garahania Dist. Madhepura, at present resident of village Mohanpur,P.S. and Dist. Madhepura. …..Opposite Parties. ------------------ 2 12.12.2011 This revision application has been preferred under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against the judgment and order dated 8.10.2009 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court in Misc. Maintenance Case No. 11 of 2002 by which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs. 1500/- per month for the maintenance of his wife and a minor son. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. From perusal of the impugned order it appears that the learned Principal Judge has considered the evidence adduced on behalf of both parties and thereafter considering that his wife and minor son have no means to support themselves whereas the petitioner has means to support them, the learned trial court has directed the petitioner to pay the aforesaid amount for the maintenance of his wife a minor son. I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. M.Rahman (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)