HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (G) No. 1763 of 2008 Df\4-W^st^^f r'^is Verss Respondents 1. 2. 3. Shambhu Ram Sahu, S/o Late Ram Rai Sahu, Aged 63 yeare, Occupation Retired head Boaring Operator inthe OfRce of Agriculturai Engineer Bilaspur R/o New Sarkanda, In Front of Chandramouli Shiv Bandhwapara, Bilaspur (C.G.) Mandir, State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of Agricuitural, D.K.5. Bhawan, Raipur, Dist"ct- Raipur (C.G.) The Accountent General, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Raipur (C.G.) The Agricutturai Engineer, (Driiling) Bitespur, Dtetrict Bislaspur (C.G.) WR!T PETITOIN UNDER ARTIGLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF JNDiA Single Bench : Hon'bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri R. K. Sharma, AdvocaSe for the petitioner. Shri A. S. Kachwaha, Deputy Advocate General forthe respondents No. 1 and 3, Miss Sharmiia Singhai, Assistant Soiicitor General for the Union of tndia/ Respondent No.2. ORALORDER (Passad on this 25 day of Maroh, 2008) 1. With the consent of !earned counsei appearing for the parties, the matter is heard finally'. *'St. 3. iliiciliy This maSSer pertains to retria! dues. This Court in the matter ofWrit Petition No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The StaSe of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connected matters, decided on 31.1.2008, directed the Committee to consider {he matter of retriai dues as the disputed question of facts were invoived. The Committee v/as constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated '>nnfi noccari .n tA? P Mn 1 QR1 /WnR mt l^ais Rai s.<j.^uu\? yctaif^y iii ¥V.r~^i^<^. i^yu^.wy ^.\3iiii.. rv^ici QCTJ /,f^,. '^ 4. 5. •'S- Thakur Chandrakar Vs. State Government and others) and order dated ;i ucii,<?u 13.3.20% pass-ed in M.C.C. No. 105/2008 (StaSe of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely st covered by the judgment and order dated 31s' of January, 2008 passed In W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baljnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattssgarh & others) and other connected matSers, as submitted by leamed counse! appearing for the parties. With the consent of the parties, this petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocste GeneraS is directed to send the case to the Commjttee, v/ithin a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shali issue notice to She petitioner and the officers concemed, within a further pertod of 15 days. The Committee shal! consider and pass order, in accordancs 'Aith law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to She petitioner. The pstitioner and the ofRcer concerned may file additiona! documente, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retrial dues, if any, te> the petitioner be completed wrthin a period of four months from thedate of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner sha!! supply extra copy of itie petition to learned counsei appearing for She respondents, for onward transmission to the said committee. Satish K. Agnihotri j Judge