THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HONBLE DR.JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT APPEAL NO. 2305 OF 2005. DATED: 25-11-2005 Between 1.The Chairman and Managing Director A.P.Transco,Vidyut Soudha, Khairatabad, Hyderabad and 3 others. ….Appellants And B.Srinivasa Rao, son of B.Mogilaiah, R/o 6-41,Bank colony, Vidyaranyapuri, Hanamakonda, Warangal district …Respondent JUDGMENT (Per Sri B.Prakash Rao, J) Heard both sides and at their request, the main appeal itself is taken up for disposal. The appellants who are the respondents in the writ petition seek to assail the order allowing the writ petition, whereunder a direction was given only to the extent of considering the application of the writ petitioner in the light of the service certificate issued by the concerned contractor which was counter signed by the officials of the respondents with reference to the agreements under which the petitioner was engaged as Contract Labour on 18-05-1997. Though several contentions are sought to be urged on behalf of the appellants with regard to merits, however, the fact remains only a direction was given to consider the petitioner’s case and no finding was given on merits and also there was no positive direction as such. In the circumstances, we do not find any reasons to interdict the same. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. ------------------------ B.PRAKASH RAO, J Dated: 25-11-2005. Hsd ------------------------ G.YETHIRAJULU, J