IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 10-11-2008 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.3381 of 2003 M/s.Classic Thread Mills (P) Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director K.B.Sajan, Pachapalayam, Coimbatore-641 010. .. Petitioner. Versus 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Energy Department, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Rep. by its Chairman, 800 Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 3.The Superintendent Engineer, Tamil nadu Electricity Board, Coimbatore Electricity Distribution Circle, (North), Coimbatore. .. Respondents. Prayer: This petition has been filed seeking for a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in his proceedings No.Permanent B.P.(F.B.) No.167, dated 11.10.2000, in respect of enhancement and demanding of additional current consumption deposit, quash the same. For Petitioner : Ms.R.Hemalatha For Respondents : Ms.D.Geetha Additional Government Pleader (R1) Mr.P.Srinivas (R2 & R3) O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. This writ petition has been filed for a writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the proceedings in Permanent B.P. (F.B.) No.167, dated 11.10.2000, in respect of enhancement and the demand of additional current consumption deposit, and to quash the same. 3. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that a Division Bench of this Court, by its order, dated 18.8.2007, made in a batch of writ petitions in W.P.No.15469 of 2007 (batch), had dismissed the writ petitions challenging the enhancement, and the demanding of additional current deposit by the Tamilnadu Electricity Board and that it has become final. However, in the said order, dated 18.8.2007, this Court had permitted the petitioners therein to make the deposit in seven equal monthly instalments. 4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents had not refuted the statements made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 5. Hence, the present writ petition stands dismissed in view of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court, dated 18.8.2007, in the batch of writ petitions cited supra. However, the petitioner is permitted to comply with the impugned proceedings, dated 11.10.2000, issued by the second respondent by making the deposit in seven equal monthly instalments, commencing from 1.12.2008. The subsequent instalments shall be paid by the petitioner, on or before the first of every succeeding month, till the entire amount is deposited. The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs. Csh Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar To 1. The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Energy Department, Chennai-600 009. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. The Chairman, The Tamilnadu Electricity Board, 800 Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 3.The Superintendent, Tamil nadu Electricity Board, Coimbatore Electricity Distribution Circle, (North), Coimbatore. MS(CO) SR/24.11.2008 Writ Petition No.3381 of 2003 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/