:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.922 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.922 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.922 OF 2008 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.3707 OF 2008 FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.3707 OF 2008 FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.3707 OF 2008 Smt. Shashikala Pawar-Pevekar ...Applicant. v. Shri Subhashchandra G. Pawar & Anr....Respondents. Mr.S.K.Pevekar , adv. for the Applicant. Mr.A.J.Jadhav , adv. for the Respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 11th July, 2008. DATE: 11th July, 2008. DATE: 11th July, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Parties. 2. The plaintiffs had filed the suit for injunction restraining the defendants from causing interference in their possession. It appears that the defendant and her father were also in occupation in the said house for a long time and there was dispute about the tenancy rights among them. Though there is a delay of 122 days, it is contended that after obtaining certified copy, the appellant had given the same to the advocate for the drafting the appeal but due to the cataract and operation of the eye of the advocate, the appeal could not be drafted and there was delay. Advocate, who was operated has appeared and argued the matter. Taking into consideration the reasons given in the application and the stay in the matter, I find that it will be in :2: the interest of justice to condone the delay. 3. In the result, civil application is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. 3. Subject to removal of office objections, if any, the appeal be registered. 4. Appeal be listed for admission after removal of office objections, if any. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (J.H. BHATIA,J.)