IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30756 of 2008 SRI RAM BIND Versus STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 2. 26.9.2008 Heard. The case is under Section 394 of the Indian penal Code. The contention is that being in custody since 16.7.2007, the petitioner has not been put on the Test Identification Parade nor anything has been recovered from his possession. The further contention is that the name of the petitioner appeared in the confessional statement of one Manoj Yadav. As regards the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge Ara, less said the better. The learned Judge did not think it appropriate to mention as to from which date the petitioner was in custody and whether he was put on the Test Identification or anything was recovered from his possession. The learned Judge has a different Police Manual as well as he mentions as Crime Number to describe the case, whereas the practice under the Bihar Police Manual is of putting 2 specifically the Police Stationwise number of the case. The Court expects that the learned Judge requires to improve his acumen a lot. As regards the facts of the case and the material in that light, let the above named petitioner be directed to be released from custody on his furnishing a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 500/- only without any surety to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara, in Jagdishpur P.S.Case No. 102 of 2003. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)