THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5737 OF 2009 Dated: 15.12.2009 Between: Shaik Ibrahim … petitioner And 1.Y. Garudappa Naidu and 3 others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5737 OF 2009 ORDER: The plaintiff in O.S.No.276 of 2005 on the file of the Court of the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadiri, is the Revision petitioner. The suit is filed for perpetual injunction restraining the defendants/respondents herein from interfering with the suit schedule property. The plaintiff got himself examined as P.W.1 and three (3) more witnesses were examined on his behalf as P.Ws.2 to 4 and the evidence of the plaintiff’s side was closed on 16.11.2009. On 17.11.2009 the affidavit of D.W.1 in lieu of his chief-examination was filed. At that stage, the plaintiff filed I.A.No.60 of 2009 with a prayer to recall P.W.1 to give further evidence for the purpose of exhibiting some documents. Having heard both sides, the Court below, by order dated 19.11.2009, dismissed I.A.No.60 of 2009, and aggrieved by the same the present Revision Petition is filed. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the material on record, I do not find any justifiable reason to interfere with the order under Revision. Having found that no satisfactory explanation could be offered by the plaintiff as to his failure to produce said documents along with plaint or at least during his evidence, the Court below had rightly dismissed the application. The discretion exercised by the Court below in dismissing the application cannot be held to be arbitrary or perverse. Consequently, the order under Revision which does not suffer from any legal infirmity warrants no interference by this Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. ____________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 15.12.2009 gbs