1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.: 12025 OF 2010 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.: 9140 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION [St] NO.: 22529 OF 2009 [R. C. No.: 417 OF 2010] *** 1. We have heard learned counsel for the Applicant. We have considered the pleadings raised in this application. We do not propose to hear the Respondents for this application. 2. The applicant seeks condonation of around 155 days delay occurred in filing application for restoration of the dismissed writ petition. Writ petition was dismissed on account of non-removal of office objection. With the ground raised in this application , we are convinced that this delay can be condoned. We do not find that the applicant is playing delaying tactics. 3. Civil application accordingly is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (A) and (B) and disposed of. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. 4. We make it clear that delay of 155 days occurred in filing civil application for restoration of dismissed writ petition, has been condoned. [SHRIHARI P.DAVARE,J.] [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.] Dated:01/10/2010. ans/12025