IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16024 of 2010 JAGDISH KUMAR SON OF SRI JAY KISHUN RAVIDAS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GOPI BIGHA, P.S. CANDI, DISTRICT- NALANDA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.05.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is that he got himself appointed on basis of a forged appointment letter. On enquiry the same on being found forged the appointment of the petitioner was cancelled. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner can not be faulted for the same. Be that as it may, considering the nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to allow him the privilege of anticipatory bail. His prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected. However, in case the petitioner surrenders in the Court below and makes an application for grant of regular bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)