-__, ,iri: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Qgfa'a 2. PETITIONER RESPONDENT VERSUS 2) 1) Vinod Singh Bais S/o Shri Baldev Singh Bais, Aged about 35 years, R/o Village and Post Gourmati, Block Development Office Lohara, Thana & Tahsil Lohara District Kabirdham (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh through The Secretary School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The District Education Officer, Kawardha District Kabirdham (C.G.) The Block Education Officer Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) f , WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Writ Petition (S) No. glb'é /2009 mmfawia? 3911mm mmm SB : HGN’BLE SHRI JUSTICE; PRITINKER DHWAKER 06.07.2009 Wm WW éaaffawm Learned. counsel for the present petition with a lib: respondent No. 1 raisiiig ail th further submits that a Smt. Sudha Agrawal, co unsel for thg petitioimr. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, G.A. for the State. In ition and the same is decided by 1 is dismissed as Withdrawn with representation by the petitio the eventuality of filing such i iced 79y this order. petitioner wants to Withdraw the :rty to fiie a representation to e grievajzces 0f the petitioner. She dire( tion be issued to the authority concerned to decide the representation so made. Learned counsel for the State has no objection if the petitioner makes a represent: the competent authority. Accordingly, the petitim the aforesaid libertv. aer, the same would be decided expeditiously by the competent authority strictly in accordance With law, Without being influei w w Sdl- Prit‘mker Diwaker Judge «i i V v at " i200? animate (whats)