IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1380 of 2009 UPENDRA YADAV @ DULLI YADAV, Son of Janardan Yadav, Resident of village – Gokulpur, P.S. – Kurtha, District – Arwal. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 18.2.2009 Heard Sri Sanjay Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri Dasrath Mehta, APP for the State. The facts of the case have been stated by me in Annexure – 1, the earlier rejection order and considering that, I am not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner on bail as the same relates to keeping social norm, judicial process and rule of law at ransom. The petition is dismissed. However, I am worried from the report of the learned Magistrate appearing at Flag ‘X’ that the case is yet to be committed. The learned Magistrate could adopt another mode if accused may not be produced before him for the purposes of taking up committal proceedings as the report states that the police papers could not have been served upon the petitioner. The learned Magistrate could adopt the procedure of serving police papers upon the accused, by sending the police papers to the Superintendent of Jail for serving the same - 2 - upon the accused and then pass the committal order. The case must be committed to the Court of Sessions within 15 days of the receipt of a copy of the present order. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)