Review Application No. 44-CII of 2008 in Transfer Application 93 of 2007 *** Present : Mr. Ranjit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.R. Mahajan, Advocate for the respondents. *** The review application has been filed seeking recall of the order dated 29.04.2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioners inadvertently attached copy of the plaint dated 04.02.2006 (Annexure P1) in which relief of permanent injunction had been claimed. Learned counsel contends that indeed the said suit was withdrawn by the respondents on13.03.2007. It is stated that in fact the petitioner wanted to file an application for transfer of the suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell. He further submits that the interim order in the case has been filed with regard to the suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell. Besides, the written statement (Annexure P2) of the Suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell has also been filed. After giving my thoughtful consideration to the contentions of the learned counsel for the parties. It may be noticed that the petitioners had prayed for transfer of the case titled Narinder Kumar and others v. Jagir Singh etc. Copy of the plaint (Annexure P1) was attached. The said suit admittedly had been Review Application No. 44-CII of 2008 [2] in Transfer Application 93 of 2007 withdrawn by Narinder Kumar and Darshan Singh-respondents on 13.03.2007. Therefore, there is no infirmity in the order dated 29.4.2008 by which the prayer for transfer of the suit which had already been withdrawn, has been declined. In the circumstances, no ground for reviewing the order dated 29.04.2008 is made out. Accordingly, the review application is dismissed. However, the petitioner may file fresh petition seeking transfer of the other suit. (S.S. SARON) JUDGE May 20, 2008 amit