IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1177 of 2001 JAGDISH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5. 22.08.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is the purchaser from the wife of Jageshwar Singh who purchased the lands in-question from Saudagar Mian, the recorded tenant so submitted the counsel for the petitioner. Under the impugned order dated 12.11.1990 passed by the Assistant Consolidation Officer, Annexure-4 the lands in-question has been recorded in favour of the private respondents as they are said to have purchased the same very lands from one Rasool Mian and were also found in possession thereof. Appreciating the factum of possession as also document of title the sale deed executed by Rasool Mian in favour of private respondents the lands in- question have been recorded in favour of the private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not confirm that petitioner was ever put in possession of the lands in-question by the vendor Saudagar Mian. 3. I do not see any illegality in the subsequent two orders dated 30.3.1992 and 7.7.2000,Annexures- 5 and 6 passed by the Deputy Director, Director, Consolidation, whereunder the original order dated 12.11.1990 was affirmed. This writ application is, accordingly, dismissed. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)