IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2459 of 2011 Amit Kumar Yadav @ Bittu Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 4 11.07.2011 In pursuance to the order dated 24.02.2011, the petitioner and opposite party no.2 are present. Opposite party no.2 claims the marriage with the petitioner on 8th of May, 2008, however, the petitioner denies the marriage. It is claimed by opposite party no.2 that she has been deserted by the petitioner since last three years and there is no issue out of wedlock. The disputed question of factum of the marriage cannot be decided in the present case. The petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 1,000/- per month to the opposite party no. 2 from August, 2011 by depositing the same in the bank account of the opposite party no.2 by second week of every month. The opposite party no.2 undertakes to supply her bank account number to the petitioner within a period of two weeks. The aforesaid payment will be subject to any order 2 being passed in matrimonial or maintenance proceeding. The aforesaid payment shall have no bearing with regard to the disputed relationship between the petitioner and the complainant. Considering the aforesaid stand of the parties, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Complaint Case No. 717(C)/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)