1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2292/2010 The State of Mah. and others Vs. Vitthal Champatrao Bhusare and another. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. Kankale, AGP for the petitioners. Mr. S. G. Malode, Adv. for respondents 1 and 2. CORAM: B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 23rd SEPTMBER, 2010. 1] Heard finally. 2] Advocate Malode has pointed out that though interim order is passed in favour of the respondents on 18.4.2009 it has not been implemented so far and Criminal ULP is also pending. He states that interest of justice can be met by asking the Industrial Court, Yavatmal to decide ULP complaint No. 133/2008 itself finally within a period of six months. Learned AGP states that the petitioners have no objection to expeditious disposal of the ULP complaint. He however invited attention to certain findings recorded by the Industrial Court in the impugned order to urge that those findings close the controversy finally. 3] I have perused those finding recorded in paragraph 7 of the impugned order. It is clarified that the said findings are prima facie in nature and observations are only for the purpose of deciding the application (Ex. 2) i.e. for interim relief in ULP complaint. Learned Member shall not be influenced by those observations while deciding ULP complaint. 4] In this situation, writ petition is disposed of by directing the Industrial Court, Yavatmal to decide ULP Complaint No.133/2008 as 2 early as possible and in any case before 31st March 2011. Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE Ambulkar.