IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17319 of 2008 YASMIN PRAVEEN DAUGHTER OF MAKBOOL KHAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHAKJARI, P.S. BIRAUL, DISTRICT- DARBHANGA. ….PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MAHTAB ALAM @ CHAND BABU SON OF SULTAN KHAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHAKJARI, P.S. BIRAUL, DISTRICT- DARBHANGA. …….O.P. ----------- 2 31.3.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved with the order dated 22.8.2007 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge (F.T.C. No.3), Darbhanga, in Cri.Revision No.538 of 2006 by which the application filed on behalf of O.P. No.2 to set aside the order of cognizance was considered by the revisional court and some observations were made by it. The Revisional Court was of the view that the D.N.A. test of the child be conducted to ascertain the truthfulness of the allegation that the accused had impregnated the petitioner. I see no illegality in the observation because the revisional court thereafter only directed for a further inquiry in accordance with law and not that a D.N.A. test be conducted. This application is dismissed. 2 The S.D.J.M., Biraul is directed to proceed in accordance with law. Anilkr.sinha (Anjana Prakash, J.)