1 Appln 5514-10 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5514 OF 2010 1. Sakharam Eknath Gondhali ..Applicants 2. Kaluram Ganpat Gondhali 3. Kailash Hasha Gondhali V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.N.N.Gavankar i/b. Mr.Arfan Sait, Advocate, for the Applicants Ms Alpa T. Javeri, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 15TH DECEMBER, 2010 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for anticipatory bail by the persons, who apprehend arrest in connection with C.R.No. I-183 of 2010 for the offence punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 326, 324 & 504 registered with New Panvel Police Station. 2 Appln 5514-10 Co-accused have been admitted to anticipatory bail by Order dated 19th November, 2010 & confirmed by Order dated 26th November, 2010 in Cri.Appln.No.5166 of 2010 of this Court. The learned APP has strong objection for the release of applicant No.1 Sakharam Eknath Gondhali. She states that applicant No.1 is specifically named as one, who hit Deepak & Manubai. Deepak had sustained fracture on his hand as also other injuries. She further states that another crime has been registered against applicant No.1 Sakharam Gondhali for causing injuries to one Shailesh Vasudeo Patil. I have perused FIR. Injuries appeared to be minor. All the same, it is expected that applicants will keep themselves away from any Criminal activity. It may be worth mentioning that in the statement Deepak states that Sakharam had hit Deepak on the left wrist while Subhash had hit him on his head. 3. Considering nature of assault 3 Appln 5514-10 attributed to even applicant No.1 Sakharam Gondhali, in the event of applicants' arrest, each of the applicants be released on bail on their furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs.15,000/- each with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.15,000/- per person on the following conditions. (i) The applicants shall report at the New Panvel Police Station for interrogation on 20th December, 2010 at 10.00 a.m. and thereafter, as and when required by the investigating officer. (ii) The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (iii) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. . The order will remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge sheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court dated 2nd December, 2010 delivered in Special Leave Petition (Cri.) No.7615 of 2009 4 Appln 5514-10 (Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State of Maharashtra And Ors.). (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)