THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN W.P.Nos.20348 OF 2010 AND 19825 OF 2011 COMMON ORDER: Heard Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, and the G.P. for Revenue,(Andhra and Rayalaseema area). At their request both the writ petitions are disposed of at the admission stage. The relief sought for in W.P.No.20348 of 2010 is to consider the claim of the petitioner for assignment of Ac.3.00 land in her favour. As a revision is pending before the Commissioner of Appeals, I see no reason to grant the said relief in exercise of the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner’s grievance in W.P.No.19825 of 2011 is that the respondents, without considering her application for assignment of Ac.3.00 of land in Sy.No.293/2, of Singagudem village, are now seeking to dispossess her from the land in question. A counter affidavit is filed by the respondents contending that the petitioner is in possession of Ac.2-00 of land; in as much as Revision Petition No.888 of 2008 is pending before the Commissioner of Appeals, and the land is not free from litigation, they are not in a position to consider the petitioner’s claim for assignment; and the petitioner’s allegation that she is in possession of Ac.3-00 of land is not correct, as she is in possession of only Ac.2-00 of land in the said survey number. In view of the fact that the petitioner’s possession of Ac.2-00 of land has not been disputed by the respondents, any action which they may take to have the petitioner evicted can only be in accordance with law. I consider it appropriate, therefore, to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner’s possession over this extent of Ac.2-00 land, and not to dispossess her from the land in question except in accordance with law including the provisions of the Land Encroachment Act. Both the writ petitions are disposed of accordingly. No costs. ___________ 08-08-2011 asp