1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11834 OF 2004 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 1645 OF 2004 1. Jalalsab S/o Khajasab and another .. .. Applicants Versus Nagorao S/o Hanmantrao Jadhav .. .. Respondents Shri N. K. Tungar, Advocate h/f Shri P. V. Mandalik, Senior Advocate for the Applicants. The respondent served – absent. CORAM : N. D. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 01ST DECEMBER, 2009. ORAL ORDER : 1. Heard Shri Tungar, learned counsel for the applicants/appellants, who are the original defendants. The impugned judgment and order is passed by the First Appellate Court i. e. Ist Ad-hoc Additional District Judge, Biloli in Regular Civil Appeal No. 42 of 2000 allowing the appeal restraining defendants, present appellants from disturbing or interfering with the possession over the suit property and appellant's claims to be in possession throughout and hold the document of possession i. 2 e. 7/12 extract and gram panchayat record, etc. 2. None appeared for the respondents, though served with notice of this Court. The second appeal is admitted. The trial Court dismissed the claim of the respondent as plaintiff for perpetual injunction and it was in favour of the defendants who are present appellants. Since the dispute is about the possession and considering the judgment of the Trial Court which dismissed the suit and after hearing the submissions of Shri Tunger the application for stay of the impugned judgment and order passed by the First Appellate Court is hereby stayed till disposal of the second appeal. The application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] bsb/Dec.09