4 94 7 L J 00WC£U776§ 1’ 'Nanlruran Dhruw b/o Late Patang Ram Dhruw ed about 33. years, now working a% As31s uem’c Hub InSpecter (Mlnlstemal) in S.?.Office, Burg (M.P.)r/o Civil Lines, Kasaridih, P.0‘.Durg (Min). 2. RaJaram RaJbhanu s/m Dwa ha Prdsad Raabhanu arred about 3L yaax- y Auditor 0/0 msmtmt Regmtrm, Fwrms 8: Socletle , 31" as mr 'DJNlslon, OfL1ce at Vlkrant Bhawan, Jarnabhata, Bilaspur (ELK) R/o Village 8< P00. : Mama? Distt. Bilasn-ur (M.E’.). Applicants . Veralls, lg State of Madhya Pradesh, through Secretary, Minis'bry oi‘ Home Afifairs, vallabh Bhawan, Bhoal (M,P.). 2. Madhya Pradesh Public SerViCe Camission through Secretary, Residency Aréa, Indore {M.Ps). RESPONDENT$ . APPLLCATEON UNDER SECTION 19 OF £DMIN1$TRQTEVE TRIBUNALS — gCT.“ tlcuLar's cf athe Ordergsz agairlst whiggiu 'this geti‘tion is made :w This petjiian is not' made against any arder but it is againgt ‘tle reSult 0f ‘the oral test for tlm East of Assistaat gastrict Public Frasecution Officer (AEP-PO for short) published in Rojgar and Nirman on .Annex. P l . 24‘3.9A which is marked and filed as gnnexure 2/1. Detailed statement has been made in this reggrd in i‘act of the case. ‘ .u..2 7 p HIGH COURT OF CHHAI'I ISGARH : BILASPUR M Writ Petition (S) No. 997 of 2005 Petitioner Mankuram Dhruw 85 another Versus ' Respondcnts State of Madhya Pradesh (now Chhattisgarh) 85 another (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) None for the petitionem. Ms Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the respondent No. 1/ State. o R D E R {oral} ( Passed on this 5th day of October, 2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. Ms I, R. Mukherjee, learned counsel pleads no instructions. The petitioners may not be interested in prosecuting the matter. In View of the foregoing, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. A copy of this order shall be sent to the petitioners forthwith. I’W" 'hom v Sdl- .1 Pans ‘ ' hK Judge Agni u K x