IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2011 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 33263 of 2011(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SAINABA, D/O.BEERAVU MUSLIYAR, NADUVILAKATH HOUSE, EDAVANAKKAD 682 502. BY ADV. SRI.K.A.SHAMSUDEEN SRI.K.J.MOHAMMED ANZAR SRI.V.K.MEETHIANKUNJU SMT.BHAMA G. NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM DT 682030. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, EDAVANAKKAD, ERNAKULAM DT 682502. 4. THE SUB REGISTRAR, KUZHUPPILLY, ERNAKULAM DT 682501. 5. THE GOSHREE ISLANDS DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM 682011, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SHAH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.33263/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO.2950/1991 DATED 9.2.1991 OF KUZHUPPILLY SUB REGISTRY. EXT.P1(a): TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 30.6.11 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KUZHUPPILLY. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DT 3.12.2011. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.C4/55417/2007 DT 8.10.2007. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DT 26.6.2009 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 28.9.2010 IN WPC NO.20524/2010. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 33263 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 13th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner says that she owns 1 acre and 6 cents of land in R.S No.298/11 of Kuzhuppilly Village. She wants to sell the property and her grievance is that the 4th respondent is refusing registration on the basis of a communication issued by the 5th respondent that the land is earmarked for acquisition and therefore the document shall not be registered. 2. Issue similar to what is complained of have already been considered by this Court and Ext.P5 is one such judgment. Consistent with the above, this writ petition is also disposed of directing that, if as on date, notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act has not been issued, it will be open to the petitioner to produce her sale deed for registration before the 4th respondent, who thereupon shall register the document. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp //True Copy// PA to Judge