IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 5468 of 2008. Decided on: 07.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ Krishan Lal Negi. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.3. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Petitioner has made a representation to the Financial Commissioner-cum-Secretary (Revenue), Himachal Pradesh on 16.5.1998. In sequel thereto, the Director of Land Records had supplied the comments on 22nd June, 1998 to the Deputy Secretary, Revenue to the Government of Himachal Pradesh. However, till date no decision has been taken by the respondents on the representation made by the petitioner on the basis of the comments furnished by the Director of Land Records on 22nd June, 1998. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2. Consequently, the respondents are directed to take a final decision on the representation made by the petitioner vide Annexure A-7 read in conjunction with the comments furnished by the Director of Land Records, Himachal Pradesh, within a period of one month after production of the certified copy of this judgment. The respondents while taking a final decision shall also take into consideration the earlier representations made by the petitioner vide Annexures A-5 and A-6. In case the representation is decided in favour of the petitioner, he shall also be entitled to all the consequential benefits. 3. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. There shall be no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 07, 2010. (sck).