70; HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (aa'71 N0. 1997 OF 2009 PSTITIONERS DEFENDANTS RESPONDENTS PLAINTIFFS 1A. 1B. 1C. 1D, 1E. 1F. 1G. 2. 1. 2. 2A 2B. 2C 2D. 2E. Smt. Shanti Bai Wd/o Late Shri Gangaram Sahu, aged about 50 years. Sint. Meena Kuinari D/o Late Shri Gangacani Sahu, W/o Shri Bharat Lal Sahu, aged about 35 years, Resident of ViUage Seo.ni, Tah. Marwahi, District Bilasplir (Chliattisgarh). . Lalit Kuinar son of Late SIiri Crangarain Sahu, aged about 33 years, Rupesh Kumar S/o Late Shri Gaagaraia Sahu, aged about 30 years, Mukesh Kuiaar S/o Late Shri Gangaram Sahu, aged about 28 years, Suresh Kumar S/o Late Shri GangaramL Sahu, aged about 26 years, Girish Kiunar son of Late Shri Gangarani Sahu, aged about 24 years, Legal represeatative (A) & (C) to (G) all resident of Ganesh Nagar, Chucbuliiyapara, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (Chliattisgarh). Shiv Kumar Sahu, S/o Jeevrakhan Saliu, Aged about 4S years, . R/o Ganesh Nagar, Chuchuiyapara, Bilaspur, Tahsil aad District BUaspur (ChIiattisgarhS. Krishna Kumar, S/o Shri Rohit Kuiuar, Aged about 25 years, R/o Gaaesh Nagar, Chuchuiyapara, Bilaspur, Tahsil aad District Bflaspur (C.G.). Birjhu, S/o Rikhiram, (Now dead, therefore, through his legal rcpresentatives); Lfttara,- S/o Birjhuram, Age& about 35 years, DiUiaran, S/o Birjhuram, Aged about 30 years, Laxmi Prasad, S/o Biqhurain, Aged about 22 years, Sarkar, S/o Birjhurani, Aged about 15 years, Bhura, S/o Bitjhlirain, Aged about 12 years, •g 2F. 20. 2H. <^. Amroutin D/o Bujhuram, Aged about 20 years, Sapura, D/o Birjhuram, Aged about 17 years, Sluvkuiaari, D/o Birjhurani, Aged about 13 years, Respondent No. 2(D), 2;E), 2(0) Ss 2(H) are niuior fhrough its elder brother DiBiaran S/o Bujhuram. Respondent No. 2(A) to 2(H) AU R/o ViUage Baghelkapa, Tahsfl. - Takhatpur, District Bflaspur (Chhattisgarh) State of Madhya Pradesh (Now Chliattisgarh), Through The CoUector, Bilaspur (Chliattisgarh). (SB :Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Shaima, J.] , Present;- Mr. Sanjay K. x^grawal, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, P.L. for the State/respondent No. 3. None for the respondents No, 1, 2 and 2A. to 2H. ORDBR 3. .-ri^. (Passedon 23/11/2011) By fhis petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India petitioiiers have chaUeaged fhe legaUty and propriety of fhe order dated 23/ 10/2008 passed by 8th Additional District Jiidge (F.T.C.), Bilaspur (C.G.) in civfl suit No. 16A/08 whereby Court below has allowed application for bifurcation claim and cause of action and directed to file aiuended plaint. Mr. Saajay K. Agrawal, Advocate for fhe petitioners aad Ms. Saugeeta Mishra, P.L. for fhe State/respondent No. 3 are heard. Order impugned and other documents perused. Considering fhe fact fhat suit has filed relatmg to different person on the basis of different cause of action, Court has directed to amend fhe plahit suitable aad separate fhe claim. by filuig separafe suit. While passmg such oider Court toelow has comniitted an in-egularity but not iUegaUly requirmg aiiyinterference in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction. Consequentty, petition is dismissed sumniarily wifh observation tliat plaintiff of fhe suit i.e. respondents No, 1 and 2A to 2H may amend plaint by fiUng appropriate petition and delete fhe one set of claini parties aad cause of action . No order as to ^ Sd/- • L—TT.P.Sharma Judge