THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.28233 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner was enrolled as Home Guard in Kurnool District vide proceedings, dated 13.11.2005. However, the Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, respondent No.3 herein, passed an order, dated 01.06.2008, directing removal of his name from the rolls. The petitioner challenges the said order. He contends that respondent No.2 felt offended when the petitioner complained of injustice to him in the course of selection to the post of Constables. It is also pleaded that the impugned order is not preceded by any notice. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home. Whatever be the cause for directing removal of the petitioner from the rolls, the impugned order cannot be sustained. It was not preceded by any notice nor any reason was mentioned. Though the petitioner was not appointed against any regular vacancy or cadre post, his enrollment as a Home Guard gives him a right to continue till he is removed from the rolls in accordance with law. Strictly speaking, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. However, this Court finds that the petitioner approached after expiry of two years. Even now, the case of the petitioner can be considered for fresh enrollment. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of, directing that the respondents shall consider the case of the petitioner for fresh enrollment as Home Guard. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt: 15.11.2010. kdl