IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10593 of 2005 Md. Hassan Raza, son of Md. Hasibur Rahmen, resident of Baisee Bazar Police Station -Baisee, District-Purnea. ….. Petitioner. Versus 1. The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd (Marketing Division) through its Divisional Manager, Mourya Lok Complex, Dakbanglow Crossing, Patna-1. 2. The Inspecting Team through the Sales Area Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Purnea. 3. Mritunjay Kumar, son of Shiv Mallik, Sharda Nagar, Ashram Road, near Congress Office of Purnea Police-Station and District-Purnea. …… Respondents. ----------- For the petitioner : M/s. Najmul Hoda & Firoz Ahamd, Advocates. For the respondents-Corporation : Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, Senior Advocate With Mr. Sanat Kumar Mishra, Advocate. ---------- 03/ 26.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents-Indian Oil Corporation and its authority. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging appointment of respondent no.3 as outlet dealer under the Fleet Operator category and for a direction to the respondent- authority to allot the petrol pump to the petitioner. 3. Although the petitioner challenged the alleged appointment of respondent no.3 made by Indian Oil Corporation (respondent no.1), but the copy of the impugned order has not been annexed. In the said circumstances, no writ of certiorari can be issued in the absence of such order. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner raises a second point that the advertisement has been made vide Annexure-1 with - 2 - respect to several places including Belgachhi in the district of Purnea, but no appointment to any out let dealer has been made till date at that place. 5. If no dealer has been appointed till date by the authority pursuant to the advertisement dated 09.06.2005, then it transpires that there is no requirement of such a dealer and hence the petitioner cannot by force be appointed as the dealer for the said place. As per the provisions of the advertisement, a complaint had to be filed within 30 days of the advertisement, but no such complaint had also been claimed to have been filed by the petitioner. 6. In the said circumstances, this court does not find any merit in this writ petition which is, accordingly, dismissed. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)