IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 4196 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 4196 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 4196 OF 2006 The President, Shahu Shikshan Sanstha, Pandharpur & anr. .... Petitioner versus Smt. Vidya Babaram Sonawane & ors...... Respondent. Shri S.G.Kudle for the petitioner Shri Ashok Tajane for respondent no.1 Shri A.P.Vanarase AGP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 26TH APRIL, 2007 DATED; 26TH APRIL, 2007 DATED; 26TH APRIL, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. An order passed by the School Tribunal allowing the appeal filed by the respondent no.1 and granting relief of reinstatements with full backwages, came to be challenged by filing the present writ petition. During the pendency of the writ petition, the school management and the employee, viz.the respondent no.1 have resolved the dispute by entering into a settlement. The Consent Terms are placed on record, which is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. As per the Consent Terms, the petitioner/management has agreed to reinstate the respondent no.1 with effect from 30-4-2007 with backwages subject to the release of the grants by the Government. 2. The petitioner no.2 Principal and the respondent no.1 are present in person. The parties, who are present in the court admit the Consent Terms to be true and correct. A joint request is made by the learned advocates appearing for the petitioners and the respondent no.1 to dispose of the writ petition in Consent Terms. Hence writ petition stands disposed of in Consent Terms.