: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4283 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4283 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4283 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUIT NO.3195 OF 1988 SUIT NO.3195 OF 1988 SUIT NO.3195 OF 1988 Smt.Shirinbai Lookman Qadir .. Plaintiff. Versus Rajesh Mansukhlal Khadawala & Ors. .. Defendants. Mr.Rajesh Marawoor for applicant. Mr.K.K.Shroff i/b.A.H.Mehta for plaintiff/respondent. Ms.K.C.Nichani for defendant No.1. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 21st AUGUST, 2007. DATE : 21st AUGUST, 2007. DATE : 21st AUGUST, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.Rajesh Marawoor, appearing in support of this application and Mr.Shroff, appearing for the plaintiff and Ms.Nichani for defendant No.1. Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit in support so also replies. 2. In my view, considering the reliefs claimed, this : 2 : Notice of Motion is not the appropriate remedy for the applicant. The applicant would have to file its substantive proceedings for claiming the reliefs and more particularly that set out in prayer clause (b) in this Notice of Motion. Reserving such liberty and keeping open all contentions of parties therein, this Notice of Motion is dismissed. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.)