BEFORE THE HON’BLE fiiGH {EGURT OF 3UHECATURE AT BIL§SPUR - g? THE M§ETER i3}? §N§EISTRL§L §}ESPETE gaff? JACINTA Nr’kiR AGEE 35 YELAARS} EKG SEE Ki). MAR, RfC'} Avi SIREN}. VffHAR, RENG RQAE N‘Ci. E, RAEPUR WJE N94 8233M m.-~§§£TET£QNER aw LME'S NAVgHARAT FUSE; CG. LTB”: THRC)UGB_ THE MANAGING DIRE€3TOR, 0L3 :U3L3RESS1- 3—1 I? SHAILENIDRA NAGILER? RAIPijR BHA%’AN,RING NEW ADBRES$k RQMB CORPQRATE NO, L 'E’ELIBANDHA, 0FF1CE~ NAVBHAMT RAIPUR HIDYQG 2. L‘IBOUR CGURT, RAIPUR THROUGH THE PREgiDING GFFICER, X C11, ANANE NAGAR, RAH-”HR ’. LABQUR CDMMISSIQNER AME} DPREA'IE @3?ERNMENT UNDER. LD. £423}: CK} OFFICE OF TRE LABOUR QOMML‘SSIQNER, GEETJéNIALE NAGxaRg kéIWJR ii, 3'17ATE OF $EHATTI$£§AR§LL THRGUGH THE SECRE'IZAR Y, EEP&RTMENT {3F LABQUR5 BKE. BI~L$WAN5 RAWUR ‘RH‘ E’ETITIGN E ‘ x W INEER ARTIECIQE 22522? OF ' 1 ’ Petitioner Jacinta Nair Versus Respondents M/s Navbharat Fuse Co. Ltd. 8r. others (Wn't Petition under Article 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnjhotri J.) None for the petin'oner. Shn' N. K. Vyas, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Shri M. P. S. Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the mspondents No. 2 to 4. 0RDER[oral) ( Passed on this 15th day of September, 2009 ) 1. The matter is called for heating twice. On both the occasions none appeals nor any lepresentation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in prosecuting the matter. 2. In View of the foregoing, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. i Sd/- t Sau'sh K. Agnihotri 1 Judge i a“ \ \ W iN, HIGH COURT OF CHHAITISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 1829 of 2004