{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1773 OF 2010 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.481 OF 2002 Vikas Chhatrapati Pande APPLICANT VERSUS Shyamsundar Kashinath Zawar RESPONDENT ....... Mr. S.B.Yawalkar, Advocate for applicant Mr. G.J.Dahad, Advocate for the respondent ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 29 th March 2010 PER COURT: 1. Today, Mr.Dahad appeared on behalf of the respondent. V.P. taken on record. 2. By this application, the applicant has prayed to restore the Civil Revision Application, which was dismissed on 03.11.2009, as the then Advocate for the applicant had withdrawn his appearance for want of instructions and hence for non appearance the said CRA was dismissed. {2} 3. It is to be noted that when the proceedings are to be dismissed for want of prosecution for withdrawal of appearance by the advocate, it is necessary to issue requisite notice in respect of withdrawal of appearance to the party concerned. It appears that no such notice is ever issued after withdrawal of appearance by the previous advocate for the applicant. 4. The application is opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent on the ground that the same is not filed, as required, within a stipulated time of one month. 5. Considering the peculiar facts and as it is noticed that before dismissal of the CRA notice, as required, was not given to the applicant, the civil application is allowed. Civil Revision Application No.481/2002 is restored to its file. Now list the civil revision application No.481/2002 for hearing on 26.04.2010. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/ca1773-09