IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14038 of 2009 Between: 1 Gadusu Satish Reddy S/o. Late G. Linga Reddy R/o. H.No. 1-1-16/12/A/B, Jawar Nagar, RTC Cross Roads, Hyderabad. 2 Boddupally Hari Babu S/o. B. Adavaiah R/o. H.No. 2-3-60/A, New Nagole, L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Government of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate Gachibowli, Hyderabad. 3 The Station House Officer, Saroornagar Polcie Station, Cyberabad Hyderabad. 4 Kudikala Srinivas S/o. K.Venkateshwarlu R/o. H.No. 1-1-96, Sringeri COlony, Mohan Nagar, Kothapet, Uppal Mandal, R.R.District., A.P. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.RAMA MOHAN Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: In this Writ Petition, the petitioners questioned the action of respondent Nos.1 to 3, in seeking to interfere in civil disputes between them and respondent No.4 in connection with residential plot bearing Nos.34 and 35 admeasuring 440 square yards in Survey Nos.132 and 133 of Block No.1, Sringeri Colony, Mohan Nagar, Kothapet Village, Uppal Mandal, L.B.Nagar Municipality, as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that on a complaint made by respondent No.4 that petitioner No.1 was making threatening phone calls to him, Crime No.805 of 2009 was registered which is under investigation. The learned Assistant Government Pleader further submitted that neither respondent No.3 nor his sub-ordinates are interfering with the civil dispute pertaining to the above- mentioned property. The submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader is placed on record and the Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly, reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy in the event of respondent No.3 or his subordinates interfering in the civil disputes in future. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.18370 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 17th July, 2009 lur