Ca C/f’ [W/ $INGLE BEW IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR tya‘iz ¢ WRIT PETITION (S) NoS’QéWZOIO / / Smt. Shalini David W/o Shri. SB PETITIONER Surendra David) aged about 55 years, Working as Assistant Teacher E.B.A. Mission Middle School, Jagdalpur, District-Bastar (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1“” . State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Scool Education, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, District-Raipur (CG) l I,“ i 2. Director, l Director of'Public Instruction, Pensan Bada, District—Raipur (CG) 3. District Education Officer Jagdalpur District—Bastar (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE ()F MANDAMIJS OR ANY OTHER WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTIONS DEEMED FIT— l. Particulars of the Petitioner— As mentioned in the cause titl‘e. (WK WWWW WW 9 (91. 5. g6 200 mm (Wu) Maw ammw Wmm WM1mr-am agaifcrqm SB: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR PRETENKER §EW§KER 03-19-2MG: Shri Azad $iddiqui, counse for the petitioner. Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, F’.L‘ for the State. Grievance cf the petitioner ts that though she is entitled for two advance increments but the same has not been passed on to her for no'reasons. He submits that number of identicai matters have been decided by this Court Where the petitioners have been permitted to file a representation, copy of one such order has been fiied by the petitioner as Annexure P-6. Counsei for the petitioner submits that the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Ashe $axena Vs. State 0t MP. & others, 2mg (tit) MPJR (SC) 59 and orders passed by this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bhardwai Vs. Municipal or oration Dur & Anot 906 2 MPJR-CJ 96 and in the case of Saiii Kant Singh Vs. ate of Chhattisgarh & others, WP. (S) No.625712908, wherein enefit of two advance increments has been granted on the basis t at B.Ed. degree was obtained, is also appiicable to the case of th petitioner, as the circuiars sought to extend benefit to those who ad obtained Diploma in Teaching Training, like the petitioner. He further submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with iiberty to make 1 representation before the respo dent No. 3 for deciding the same i Withhw so C hr ” t rag 1 XI-HC—78 mm wt 200 3mm (Wu) mmm WWW mwm Wnmwwg‘am __2_«—-— $aimana¥r On 'the other hand. counse! for the State submits that he has no objection if the petétioner makes a representation and the same is decided in accordance with i In View of above, the petiti ner is permitted to withdraw this petition with iiberty to fiie repi sentation before the respondent No. 3 is expected to decide the No. 3 and in turn the respond e representation so fiied, in accord nce with iaw. Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge a .