1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- MISC. APPLICATION No. 78 of 2006 LRS.OF MOHD.SAFFI V/S LRS.OF PRITHVI RAJ Mr. KC SAMDARIYA, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 15.9.2006 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, and perused the application. Even according to para-4 of the application the appellant had contacted the counsel on 3.8.2006 by which time sufficient time was available for compliance of the order dt. 20.7.2006. That apart even otherwise from a reading of the application I do not find any sufficient cause to have been made out for granting any extension of time as it is not disclosed as to when the appellant had gone to Calcutta, and when did he return, and when were they intimated about judgment dt. 20.7.2006, even if it were to be assumed that the date “3.8.2006” was mistakenly mentioned as contended by the counsel for the appellant in para-4 instead of 3.9.2006. 2 Thus, I do not find any force in the application. The application is, therefore, dismissed. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /Sushil/