IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6373 of 2010 PREMCHAND SINGH SON OF SRI KRIPAL SINGH ALIAS RAM KRIPAL SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- ROTWAN, P.S. BAGHAILA (NOKHA) DISTRICT-ROHTAS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. PUNAM DEVI DAUGHTER OF SHANKAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NAWADIH, P.S. ROHTAS, DISTRICT- ROHTAS. ----------- 2 26.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the present complaint has been filed at the behest of the family members of the complainant. It is further submitted that on perusal of the statement on solemn affirmation (S.A.) it appears that the same is absolutely vague. It is further submitted that the petitioner had always remained ready to keep the complainant and as a matter of fact has also filed a case for restitution of conjugal rights as well. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State is not in position to refute the above submissions. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, District- Rohtas, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1537 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)