CRM-M- No. 35102 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M- No. 35102 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 25.11.2011 Gurjeet Rani and another …Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents ………. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Jasjeet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Munish Raj, Advocate for the petitioners. *** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Prayer in the present petition, filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is for the issuance of directions to respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners from respondent Nos. 4 to 6. Both the petitioners are personally present before me, duly identified by Mr. Jasjeet Singh, Advocate. Respondent No.4-father of petitioner No.1 is also present in person, duly identified by Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate. Respondent No.4 has stated that petitioner No.1 was got engaged with Naresh, therefore, she could not have married with petitioner No.2 legally. Petitioner No.1 states that although she was got engaged to Naresh under the compulsion of her parents, however, the marriage was not performed with Naresh. She further states that she does not want to marry with Naresh and she has already married with petitioner No.2. She further states that she is major and 22 years old. CRM-M- No. 35102 of 2011 (O&M) 2 There is no dispute on the point of age of petitioner No.1, therefore, I direct respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur, to take decision on the representation (Annexure P-5), moved by the petitioners, within a week and provide protection to the petitioners as per law. Petition stands disposed of. ( Alok Singh ) November 25, 2011 Judge Anand