1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8975 OF 2006 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 194 OF 2003 Pandit S/o Yadav Patil and others .. .. Applicants Versus Bhikabai W/o Waman Patil and others .. .. Respondents Shri Arvind Kawade, Advocate h/f Shri P. R. Patil, Advocate for the Applicants. Shri Girish Rane, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Shri D. P. Palodkar, Advocate for the Respondents No. 2, 4 and 5 – absent. CORAM : N. D. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 07TH DECEMBER, 2009. ORAL ORDER : 1. Heard Shri Kawade, learned counsel holding for Shri P. R. Patil, learned counsel for the applicants. This is an application for transposing the applicants No. 2a to 2e as respondents and issuing notices against them and for deleting the name of appellant No. 2. 2. The dispute is about partition of the joint family property. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is 2 allowed. The applicants No. 2a to 2e be transposed as party respondents and accordingly notices are directed against them returnable four weeks. The name of appellant No. 2 be deleted from the title clause of the appeal memo. Necessary corrections be made within a period of one week from today. The civil application is disposed of accordingly. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] bsb/Dec.09