1 10055.10 SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10055 OF 2010 Kavita Shantaram Pagare ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.J.G.Reddy for Petitioner. Mr.Vijay D.Patil, Govt.Pleader for Respondents. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED:- APRIL 7, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, by consent. Mr.Patil, G.P. waives notice for Respondents. 3. As short question is involved, Petition is taken up for final disposal forthwith, by consent. 4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in this Petition is squarely answered by this Court in Writ Petition No.9200/2010. Even in the present Petition, challenge is to the communication issued by the Child 2 10055.10 Development Project Officer dated 21st September, 2010 calling upon the petitioner to submit her resignation from the post of Anganwadi Sevika. Even in the companion cases, which are already disposed of by this Court, the contention raised was identical. This position is fairly accepted by the learned Government Pleader. 5. In the circumstances, the Petition is disposed of for the reasons recorded in order dated 23rd February, 2011 in Writ Petition No.7693/2010 and dated 8th March, 2011 in Writ Petition No.9200/2010 on the same terms as stated in the said order. 6. Accordingly, Petition is allowed with the observations made in order dated 8th March, 2011 in Writ Petition No.9200/2010 in terms of prayer clause (b). Petition disposed of accordingly. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)