1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2866 OF 2008 Baliram Dnyanoba Sontakke ...Petitioner VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents ..... Shri R.R.Suryawanshi, advocate for the petitioner Shri S.K.Tambe, A.G.P. for respondent/State Shri P.K.Joshi, advocate for respondent no.2 ..... CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, JJ. DATED : 18 th November, 2010 PER COURT : 1 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2 Counsel for the petitioner submits that in the year 1999 the petitioner appeared for postal D.Ed. course and failed in one subject. Thereafter in the year 2004 the petitioner appeared to clear the said subject, but again failed. Thereafter the petitioner's services are not confirmed and the petitioner is not getting pay, though counsel submits that the petitioner is in service. Learned counsel submitted that either the State be directed to grant one more chance to the petitioner to appear for the said subject or the petitioner be exempted from the requirement of passing D.Ed. examination. 2 3 Both the requests cannot be considered. Teacher has to be a qualified person. We would not enter into the issue as to how the petitioner is continued in service. No interference is called for in extra ordinary jurisdiction of this court. If the petitioner is in service, the petitioner may resort to alternate remedy. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (NARESH H.PATIL, J.) dbm/wp2866.08