^la'y^lL^ ^3£.S^i <"/ 'CTE) I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W. P.(S). N0. s^'-cs /2006 PETITIONER ...<^ ..^••^ ^.y^y 6^y ^y-' fe. RamavtarYadava /' S/o Shri Guhan Lal Yadav Age about 45 years, Village-Jabaibandha Post-Khola Tehsil - Abhanpur Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS .iS" RESPONDENT 1. ^ State Govt. ofChhattisgarh Through Secretary Educational Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Drictt.-Raipur(C.G.) District Education Officer/^ Raipur, District-Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioner most humbly submits as under:- © n '•$.' HI6H COURT OF CMHATnSfiARH AT BILASPUR W. P.fSlNo. 5635 of 2006 Petitioner : Ateghanath Yadw Versus Respondents : State 6ovt. of Chhuttisgarh A ano'ther W.P.(aNo.S636of2006 Petitiqner : Gapdhar Prasad Sahu Versus Respondents : State 6ovt. of OihatMsgarh A ano'ther W. P.^No. 5637 of 2006 Petitioner : Ranioahontor 6up1a Versus Respandents : Sfate 6<wt. of Chhattisgarh A anolher W. P.faNo. 8638 of 2006 Petitionw : Tcekam Lal Sinha Versus Reaponduils : Stetefiovt.ofChhattiagarhAaiwlhcr W.P.fS)No.5639of 2006 Retitioner Respondcnts Smt. SwwtaPal Ver<us : Statefiovt.ofChhattisgarhAonolher W. P.(S)No. 5640 of 2006 : Mahboob Khan Quratehi Petitknier : Weraus Respondcnts : State6i>vt.<»fChhattiagcrhAano1t W. P. (St No. S641 of 2006 Pletitioner : Smt. JageaNnri Bhayl Weraus Respondcnts : SlutBSwt.ofChhnttisgnrhAawthw W. P. (S No. S642 of 2006 Petitioner : Tulendra Kumar Tniari Veraus Reapondents : State 6ovt. of Chhattiagerh Aano-ther W.P.fS)Nt>.S643of2006 Petitioner : Ramayfar Vadwu WBMUS Redpondents : State6ovt.ofChhattiagnrhAan»1hcr r" .••s;[."- Pktitioner Reapondents RBtitioner Rcspondents Petitioner Reapondents Petithiner RBSpondents Petitioner Bci Petitioner Rcapondwits Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Reapondents Petitioner Reapondents W.P./StNo.B644of2006 ; Anuj Ram Sahu Verau : StateSovt.ofChhattisgnrhAanolher W. P.fSiNo. 5646 of 2006 : ftByenctou Kumar 6up*a Versus State 6ovt. of ChhatWsgarh ^tonyrtiw W. P.fSlNo. 5647 of 2006 ; SharadThinri Versus : StuteSovt.ofChhattisgurhAonolher W. P. (S^ No. 5648 of 2006 : MohendraPKMadShukla Versus : SlateAwt.ofChhctttogarhAamythw W. P. fSl No. 5673 of 2006 : fiunbhaoahan Sohu Versus ; State 6<wt. of Ghhuttiagnrh A ano'thcr W. P. f5»No. 5674 of 2006 s Snt. Jaya Tiwnri Versus : S»ute6ovt.ofChhattia9erhdano-ther W. P.raNo. 5675 of 2006 Tuto Rnm Chandrakar Versus State 6ovt. of ChhotHagarh Aano'riier W. P.fSlNo. 5676 of 2006 : ftamesh Kunar Verma Veraus : State6ovt.ofChhattis9urhAano1her And W.P.f5iNo.5677ofM06 Versus Ohansny Ratel State fiavt. af ChhoittJagBrhAonolher 'y( Siigto Buich: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satiali K. AgnilNrtri. Shri Ajay Shrivustfam, Advocatc for the Rfetitioners. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Oy. 6ovt. Adwcate for 'ltBe reapondents/Stute. 1. Leamed OR&ER ^6tl'0ctober. 2006)3 rnsel appeuring for the|i&titjoma^ aubmits •tha* S's- 'ys' tLi[^ uihile uwrking as Asaistant TaachersAJpper Owiskm Tcaehers/Leehircrs, •the petitioners haw 9onc on trainir^ •to improve •their qualrfications on theh' otNn expcnaes and ucquired B. Ed7B.TJ EacaminocMon Certificote. 2. "The present twit petitions, being WfJ^ Nos. 5635/2006. 5636/2006.5637/2006.5638/2006.8639/2006.8640/2006. S641/Z006. 5642/2006, 5643/2006, 5644/2006, 5646/2006. 5647/2006. 8648/2006, 5673/2006,5674/2006,0676/2006. 5676/2006 ond 5677/2006 involw aimitar fecta and common qucstion of ION». Thus, Iheae petHiona are faung disposed of by •this conunon order. 3. Accbrding •h) leamed counsel for Ihe petjtioners, 'the petitioners are entitled to •h»oadvunce inerements in vie—of •the dedsion of •this Court' m Ihe caae of yaahtinnt Kumur Bhuradwny Vs. Afainicipal Corporation, Our9 ond ano'thcr {2006 CEE) MPJR-C6 96). This Court in Ihe cuse of Yaahwnnt Kumar BharodiNaj Vs. Municipal Corporartion. tXrg and ano'thu* R n^ (Supra). OBne to Itie conclusion 1hat Ihe teachws. wiho had obtained B.Ed./B.Tl. Examinution CBrNficate on his o*m expenses, are covered by 1+ie drcula' du»Bd24.12.98 teaied by •the Stute Sovemment of Atadhya Pmdeah. 4. Learned counael for the petitioners furfhu" subnrits •that Ihe focts and question ®flu»inwlwd in 1h«(yatent COSM urc aquardy cavercd by ctecision of -this Court' h Ihe caae of Yadiwant Kumar BharadNnJ Vs. AAunicipal Corporution, Durg ond ano-ther (5upn»), to wihich leamed coumd app«arin9 for •the reapondcnts fnirly conaedvs and ngrees t»i'ththe dwennent made by Iwmed counael appearirq for Ihe pctitwners. 5. Accordingly, •the writ petrtions are alle««Bdin tenns of Ihe order passed in Ihe case of yash«innt Kuianr Bharad-nj Vs. Mtinicipal Corponrtion, Durg ond ano'lhw (Supru). aAjtct te verification of Ihe fact cs to ihether •rt—petrMonu's huws ncquired B. Ed7B.TJ. Examuwtwn Cn^ificate on Ihejr ot»n expenaes or not. No orderas to costa. 6. A copy of Ihis order be pla»don record of o'thcr connecNtd writ petitions. Sd/- SarishK.Agaihotri Judge Babhi