IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 26747 of 2003 Between: D.Vijaya Lakshmi, W/o.D.Pitchi Reddy K.Uppalapadu, Kondepi Mandal, Prakasam District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Prakasam District 2 The Chief Planning Officer, Ongole, Prakasam district. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing proceedings No.240/DY.S.O(Plg.1)/2001 dated 05.11.2003 and further allotment of works to the persons of their choice, is irregular, arbitrary and against the prescribed procedure, against G.O.Rt.No.382 Planning IV Department dated 13.06.2003 and consequently set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.P.ravishankar, Advocate, representing MR.A.RAMAKRISHNA Counsel for the RespondentS: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO.26747 OF 2003 ORDER: Though the interlocutory applications are listed, the learned counsel for the petitioner Sri P.Ravi Shankar representing Sri A.Ramakrishna, submits that in view of the averments made in the counter affidavit, the writ petition itself has become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. ___________ (V.V.S.RAO,J) 30.08.2004. pln ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. 2 The Chief Planning Officer, Ongole, Prakasam district. 3. 2 CCs to the G.P. for Land Acquisition, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 4 2 CD copies. Form-NIC-OGS/WP{ }