IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2008 / 30TH ASWINA 1930 OP.No. 31314 of 2000(C) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- P.V.NARAYANI, KUNNAMKULAM, PALLIKKARA ILLAGE, P.O. BACKEL, KASARAGODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE (l) DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ALDN REVENUE COMMISSIONER THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KASARAGODE AT KANHANGAD. 4. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), HOSDURG, KASARAGODE DISTRICT 5. P..CHANDU, S/O. SANKARAN, PAYATTICHAL, P.O., PERIYA, HOSDURG TALUK. ADV. SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED ANZAR FOR R1 TO 4 THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON CMP. NO.53238/2000 IN OP. 31314/2000 DISMISSED 22.10.2008 SD/- KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE SCHEDULE ATTACHED TO ORDER DT. 17.8.74. P2:- COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P3:- COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 29.8.98 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P4:- COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT. 24.12.99. P5:- COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT NO.D.DE. 13737/2000 L.R. (J) 2, DT. 23.6.2000. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE tss KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------------ O.P.No.31314 OF 2000 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner is essentially aggrieved since an assignment in her favour as per Exhibit P1 was cancelled. The main contention is that the cancellation is made after 15 years by the appellate authority. But, it is seen from the order of the appellate authority that the said authority has remanded the matter to the Tahsildar for passing fresh orders on verification of the entire records. Therefore, this Court need not go into the various contentions taken by the petitioner, since the petitioner will get every opportunity before the Tahsildar to take all available contentions. 2. Therefore, this original petition is disposed of directing the fourth respondent/competent authority to pass consequential orders pursuant to Exhibit P3, if not already passed, with notice to the petitioner, fifth respondent and any other affected party, after permitting the parties to verify the records, within a period of four months. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp KURIAN JOSEPH, J. O.P.No. 31314 OF 2000 J U D G M E N T 22.10.2008