IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1094 of 2009 GEETA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 4.10.2010 The petitioner, who is the informant of Atary P.S. Case No.61 of 2002 registered under sections 302 and other allied sections of the Penal Code, seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to arrest the accused persons. It is alleged by the informant that accused Manish Kumar Singh and Jitendra Kumar Singh tried to misbehave with her as well as her elder daughter-in-law, to which her son Sandeep Kumar aged about 14 years protested. The aforesaid accused persons threatened him with dire consequences. It is further alleged that when she was returning to her village after selling vegetables, she saw accused Jitendra Singh and Manish Singh pushing her son Sandeep Kumar into the ‘Well’, as a result of which he succumbed to the injuries. Thereafter the informant went to the Mukhiya of the village namely Dinesh Singh who asked the informant to forget the past. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in course of investigation charge sheet was submitted against accused Manish Kumar whereas the investigation against the accused Jitendra Kumar Singh is pending. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State wherein it has been stated that the case was supervised by the 2 KHAN Dy. S.P. who found that on account of political rivalry with the local Mukhiya, one Rajendra Yadav, the then MLA got this false case instituted. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed a representation before the D.I.G. Magadh Range, Gaya but no order has been passed as yet. Having heard counsel for the parties, this writ application is disposed of with an observation that it would be open for the petitioner to pursue her remedy before the D.I.G. Magadh Range, Gaya. (S.P.Singh,J)