1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 636/2008 (Uddhav Rama Nagre and ors. Vs. State of Mah. & ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : MAY 2, 2008. Heard Mr. Joshi for the petitioners, Mrs. Bodade, A.G.P., for respondent nos. 1 to 3, and Mr. Kale for the respondent no.4. In view of the affidavit filed by the respondent no.4 on record, the counsel for the petitioners orally seeks permission to implead the Director of Municipal Administration, Mumbai, as party respondent to the petition. Permission granted. Necessary amendment to the cause title be carried out forthwith. Notice to newly added respondent is waived by Mrs. Bodade, the learned A.G.P. The only grievance of the 2 petitioners in the present writ petition is that the petitioners were selected for the post of Shikshan Sevak by the competent authority in the interviews held on 6/7/2007, however, till this date, the respondents have not issued order of appointment. Shri Kale, the counsel for the respondent no.4, states that for want of approval from the Director of Municipal Administration, the orders could not be issued and the issue is pending with the Director of Municipal Administration. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, since it is not in dispute that the petitioners are duly selected candidates, we dispose of the petition and expect the Director of Municipal Administration as well as other concerned to look into this aspect as early as possible and communicate its decision to respondent no.4 for taking appropriate steps in this regard, if there is no other impediment in doing so. JUDGE JUDGE RMP