1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 982 of 2008 URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, BIKANER V/S RAJENDRA PRASAD VYAS & ANR Mr. DILIP SINGH RAJVI, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. HEMANT DUTT, for the respondent Date of Order : 5.11.2008 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the impugned order. As appears from the impugned order that in connection with an FIR, the writ petitioner was placed under suspension, however, he was acquitted and was granted all consequential benefits. The controversy that remained only was about assignment of appropriate seniority, inasmuch as, during this interregnum period, persons junior to the petitioner was happened to be promoted. Learned Single Judge has noticed that in the reply, a stand was taken that as per orders of the State Government, the writ petitioner's name was sent by U.I.T. to government for sanctioning the promotion, and that benefit will be given after receipt of decision from the government. In our view, in these circumstances, the direction 2 given by learned Single Judge does not require any interference in appeal. Obviously, it is expected that the State Government would accord necessary sanction if at all it is necessary. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. ( KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/