In the Punjab and Haryana High Court, at Chandigarh. CRM-34352 of 2011 and CRM-M-19701 of 2011 Decided on July 05,2011 Sunder Lal Gupta -- Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and another --Respondents. Present: Mr.J.S.Cooner,Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner. Rakesh Kumar Jain,J:(Oral) CRM-34357 of 2011 Allowed as prayed for. CRM-M-19701of 2011 This petition is filed against the order dated 11.2.2011 by which the learned Appellate Court, while suspending the sentence of the petitioner, has directed him to furnish bank guarantee of the amount of the cheque. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner be allowed to furnish bank guarantee of a lesser amount as the amount is disputed by him. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any merit in the present petition because the petitioner has already been convicted by the learned Magistrate on account of dishonour of cheque and during the pendency of the appeal, the learned Appellate Authority has rightly imposed the condition of furnishing bank guarantee while granting order of suspension of sentence. Dismissed. July 05,2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge