IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 4444 of 2008 Between: P.R.M.Rao E-376258 S/o.Venkateswara Rao Tanuku Depot, R/o. Tanuku, West Godavari District. ..... PET IT IONER AND 1 The APSRTC, rep. by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Manager, APSRTC, West Godavari Region at Eluru. 3 The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Tanuku, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT (S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in suspending the petitioner from service on the allegation of suspected re issue of Rs.3/- denomination tickets vide proc. No. 02/95(7)/2008/TNK, dt. 12.2.2008 and issuing charge sheet to as illegal, without jurisdiction, unjust and arbitrary and as such liable to be set aside in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.M.SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: C.PRAKASH REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.4444 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled questioning the order of suspension of the petitioner from service. Though the writ petition was ﬁled on 29.2.2008, the same is not admitted as of now. Now the learned counsel appearing for respondents states that the very enquiry was concluded on 11.6.2008 and the petitioner was removed from service. In view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and it has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 2.9.2008 DA THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.4444 of 2008 2.9.2008