IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 21972 of 2008 Between: Kedarasetty Venkateswarlu, S/o. Sri Kedarasetty Kotayya, R/o. Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Rep by its Commissioner, Visakhapatnam. 2 The Tahsildar, Parawada Mandal Revenue Oficer, Parawada, Visakhapatnam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Order or Direction not to make any constructions in the property of the petitioner and to not dispossess the petitioner from the said property, and to declare that the actions of the Respondents to take over the property of the petitioner without due process of law as illegal, capricious, malafide and violative of the principles of natural justice, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.V.S.CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.N.RANGA REDDY (SC FOR MPL. CORP. VSP) The Court made the following : ORDER This writ petition has been ﬁled by Kedarasetty Venkateswarlu assailing the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess him without following due process of law. The petitioner claims to be owner of Ac.0-21 cents in Sy.No.257/1 having purchased the same under two sale deeds dated 16-03-1981. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the 1st respondent is trying to dispossess him from the land admeasuring Ac.0-21 cents in Sy.No.257/1, without following due process of law. When the writ petition came up for admission, S r i N.Ranga Reddy, learned standing counsel for Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation received notice on behalf of R1. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue received notice on behalf of R2. Learned standing counsel appearing for the 1st respondent, on instructions, submits that the 1st respondent will follow due process of law, in the event, the petitioner is required to be dispossessed from the land admeasuring Ac.0-21 cents in Sy.No.257/1. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to follow due process of law in the event the petitioner is required to be dispossessed from the land admeasuring Ac.0-21 cents in Sy.No.257/1. No costs. __________ 30-09-3008 rkk