- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.957 OF 2008 SUMMONS NO.957 OF 2008 SUMMONS NO.957 OF 2008 IN IN IN ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.137 OF 2008 PETITION NO.137 OF 2008 PETITION NO.137 OF 2008 Sulochana Jagdishprasad Agarwal ...Petitioner vs. Ratan Agarwal @ Ratan Garg ...Respondent Mr.Anil Agarwal for the petitioner Mr.Mukesh Dongare i/b A.M.Saraogi for the Respondent CORAM CORAM CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : DECEMBER 4,2008 : DECEMBER 4,2008 : DECEMBER 4,2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner in support of the chamber summons and the learned counsel for the respondents. By this chamber summons, the petitioner is seeking amendment to the main petition on the basis of the subsequent events namely Award made by the Arbitral Tribunal during the pendency of the petition. In view of the averments made in the affidavit in support of the chamber summons, the amendment deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out with two weeks. Arbitration petition along with Arbitration Petition (L) No.540 of 2008 to be fixed for admission after the amendment is carried out. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE