IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 313 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 29/12/2006 in WP NO : 16016 OF 1996 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 The Chairman, LIC of India, Yogakshema, Jeevan Bhima Marg, Central Office, BOMBAY-21. 2 The Zonal Manager, L.I.C. of India, South Central Zonal Office, Saifabad, Hyd-500063. 3 The Senior Divisional Manager, L.I.C. of India, Divisional Office, Thadithota, Rajamundry-533103. ..... APPELLANTS AND 1 N.Ganapathi Rao, S/o late Veerabhadra Swamy, Hindu, r/o D.No.46-23-7, Danavaipet, Rajamundry-533193. (Writ Petitioner) 2 District Collector, Srikakulam District, Srikakulam. 3 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Social Welfare (CW I) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: SRI.BATHULA RAJ KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent.: SRI.M.SURENDER RAO The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 313 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy ) This appeal is filed by respondents in W.P.No.16016 of 1996 against order dated 29.12.2006 whereby the learned Single Judge while directing reinstatement of respondent No.1 into service, directed that the backwages and continuity of service shall be considered after full enquiry into the genuineness of the community certificate of respondent No.1 is completed. At the hearing, Sri Bathula Venkateswara Rao fairly stated that respondent No.1 has already been reinstated in pursuance of the directions of the learned Single Judge and this Court may direct respondents 2 and 3 to complete the enquiry within a time frame. Sri M. Srinivasa Rao, Counsel for respondent No.1 says that he has no objection for granting such a direction. In view of these submissions by both the Counsel, the writ appeal is disposed of with the direction to respondents 2 and 3 to complete the proceedings initiated under the provisions of the A.P. (SCs, STs & BCs) Regulation of Issue of Community certificates Act, 1993 after giving an opportunity to both the parties, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. ________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari ____________________________ Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy 5th February, 2009 Nn THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO :313 of 2009 (Judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy ) 05.02.2009