FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3605 OF 2011 NAGORAOL BHAURAO CHAVAN VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA ... Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rodge Pratap G. APP for Respondent(s): Mr.G.R.Ingole. ... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. Dated: August 26, 2011 ... 1. Perused investigation papers, which were made available for the inspection purpose, as well as heard learned respective counsel for the parties, finally. 2. This is an application, preferred by the applicant- Nagorao Bhaurao Chavan, seeking anticipatory bail, apprehending his arrest under Crime No.30/2011, registered at Manatha Police Station, District Nanded for the offences punishable under sections 420,467,468,471 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code. 3. It appears that offence has been registered on the basis of the complaint lodged by one Kavitabai Tukaram Padghane on 22.7.2011. It is alleged that co-accused Lata had applied for the post of Anganwadi Sevika. In fact complainant was qualified and eligible for the said post. However, all the FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders accused in collusion, fabricated the forged documents of transfer certificate, muster register and thereby selected the accused No.1 Lata Jadhav. Present applicant was the Head Master at the relevant time. 4. On perusal of the contents of the complaint, it appears that name of the applicant and co-accused Lata have been reflected therein and specific role has been attributed towards the applicant herein that the applicant i.e. accused No.2 Nagorao, was Head Master of the school at the relevant time, and he forged and fabricated the transfer certificate and muster showing that co-accused was studying in the said school and she attended the said school. 5. It appears from the investigation papers that in fact there were 45 students in the class, but name of the co- accused Lata was shown as 46th Student and said muster register is under the signature of the applicant herein. Moreover, as regards issuance of Transfer Certificate to the co-accused Lata Jadhav, it appears that applicant herein issued school extract under his signature on 8.6.2011, deleting the reason for leaving school, which was in earlier T.C. of April, 2011. Moreover, statements of Bhimrao Baliram Fulewad who is earlier Head Master and the statement of Sadashiv Jadhav, Secretary are self explicit and FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders connects the applicant with the alleged crime. 6. In the circumstances, considering the accusations made against the applicant and nature and gravity thereof and seriousness of the offence, custodial interrogation of the applicant is necessary for further progress in the investigation, in proper perspective, and hence present application deserves to be rejected. 7. In the result present application lacks merit and hence stands dismissed and disposed of finally. These observations are the primafacie in nature, same may not be used in any other matter, being decided on merits. ( SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. ) AAA/- ***