IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2009 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 10254 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.K.JAYAPRAKASH, COMPUTER OPERATOR, KANGAZHA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO.1145, MUNDATHANAM BRANCH, KANGAZHA PATHANADU, KOTTAYAM DIST. (ADDRESS CORRECTED VIDE ORDER DTD.6.4.2009 ON I.A.NO.5044/09) BY ADV. SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY SRI.GOKUL DAS V.V.H. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KANGAZHA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO.1145, KANGAZHA, PATHANADU, KOTTAYAM, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SECRETARY, KANGAZHA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO.1145, KANGAZHA, PATHANADU, KOTTAYAM. 3. JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KOTTAYAM. 4. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), CHANGANACHERRY. 5. DEPUTY REGISTRAR (PRINCIPAL), CO-OPERATIVE TRAINING CENTRE, NAGAMPADOM, KOTTAYAM-1. 6. CHAIRMAN, STATE CO-OPERATIVE UNION, CHENKALCHOOLA,TRIVANDRUM. 7. SECRETARY, STATE CO-OPERATIVE UNION, CHENKALCHOOLA, TRIVANDRUM. R1, R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.N.MOHANAN R3, R4 BY GOVT. PELADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR R6, R7 BY ADV.SRI.MOHAMMED NIAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN WPC.10254/09 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT BANK. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 17.3.09 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE DETAILED REPRESENTATION BEFORE THE 3RD REPSONDENT. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 27.3.2009. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R1(a): TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 29.5.2000, 20.12.2008. EXT.R1(b): TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 24.4.09 OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR. /TRUE COPY/ THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.10254 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of April, 2009 JUDGMENT With the counter affidavit on record, I do not find it necessary for this Court to issue any direction to the employer society to deploy the petitioner for the JDC course this year. The bank has demonstrated that it has a dearth of staff. However, learned counsel for the bank states that for the next year, the petitioner's claim would be considered in view of the likelihood of recruitment of 4 new staff into the society. This is recorded. The writ petition is closed without expressing anything otherwise on merits. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.7/4.