IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.282 OF 2011 Divakar s/o Govindrao Gunjkar & ors. ... APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT ..... Shri S.B. Ghatol Patil, Advocate for applicants Shri N.B. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 28th February, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard. On a trivial issue, the accused/ applicant No.1, a teacher, has allegedly assaulted the complainant by entering her house. She suffered contusion at face and nose. The applicants and the complainant are known to each other. The three witnesses, to which learned A.P.P. has given reference, are mostly husband and other relations of the complainant. 2. At this stage, no independent witness has pointed the role of the accused/ applicants in assaulting the complainant. Considering nature of accusations and accused/ applicant No.1 being gainfully employed, least chances of absconding, nothing is to be recovered, the interim protection dated 27.1.2011 is made absolute, by modifying attendance condition, to attend investigator on every Sunday between 4.00 p.m. to 6.00 p.m. till filing charge sheet. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cri282.11