BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT CHHATTIseARH AT BILASPUR C.6 •2^- (^.^,»^0 - - . . - l^x.o APPELLANT:- "^ ^' Surya Prakash Soni ^. .'•' ^<sy> \.-& ^y ^ ^"' ^ ^PONDENTS:- ^ s/o Late Sri.Radheshyam Soni aged:44years r/o. 118, New Civic Centrer, Bhilai-490 006 Tah.A bistt: Durg, Chhattisgarh VERSUS 1. Punwa S/o Sarvan Age: 72 years ^: Ramprasad S/o Punwa age: 42 years 3. Punit Ram S/o Late Bakhria Puranik Age'. 40 years 4. Pardeshi Ram S/o Late Bakhria Puranik Age: 35 years >. Punni Bai D/o Late Bakhria Puranik Aged 45 years 6, Mangteen Bai w/o Late Bakharia Puranik 7f. Dhelia Bai w/o late Bakharia Puranik ^ Respondents 1 to 7are r/o Vill. Junwani near leela Chauk Tah and Distt. Durg C.G. I. Deepak t^ubey s/o Umashankar Dubey Padmnabhpur burg . 9. Lukesh Kumar Sahu s/o Jeevrakhan Lal Sahu aged 31 years r/o Azad Chauk Vill Ahiwara &urg ^K). The collector Ourg, APPEAL UNbER ORDER 43 RULE (DCr) CIVIL PROCEbURE CODE A^AINST ORbER DATEb 24/$?09 PASSED BY SRI.A.K.PANDA. DISTRICT JUDGE.bURe IN CIVIL SUIT N0.1A/08 ^s 7^[ ^iqr^l^, ^TTi-H^Co, t^RTOiy ^^.....44^.."-"-<^-"/"J-D- WWiT^W^s ^il^^^ (^^^) ^^ ^T RTiicb ^WT s^l sr»*ii<=r» Sahu S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Aatirwal 28.04.2010 ^<nw^f^3?^r Shri Arjun Yadav, Advocate Shri BP Sharma. Advocate foi Vpf appellant. respondents. Learned counsel appearing this appeal may be disposed of |the suit within the stipulated time pe| Prayer is reasonable and is al| Accordingly, the appeal is jdirected to decide the suit in acc^ Imerits as eariy as possible preferak |from the date of receipt of acopy] lcosts. flor disbosed Qb!^{d41T1 'HR^f'? 1^1 ll^K ^ 3tf?F? 3?I^¥1 the appeltant submits that dir^cting the trial court to decide 1-iod. lowed. of and the trial court is |>rdance wlth law on its own 41y within a period six months 1 of thls order. No order asto Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge ^ra^T sN^r ^rr^^, .^T;r:<(?{k —FS/I47—2/201o—i ,00,000.