IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1893 of 2009 Arvind Thakur @ Arvind Kumar Thakur S/O Sri Dinesh Thakur R/O Vill Phulwaria(Rajia), P.S. Benipatti, Dist- Madhubani----------------------------Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Mahesh Thakur S/O Late Chandrika Thakur 3. Vinod Thakur S/O Mahesh Thakur 4. Ashok Thakur S/O Mahesh Thakur 5. Shravan Thakur S/O Mahesh Thakur 6. Sanjeev Thakur S/O Mahesh Thakur. Opp. Parties 2 to 6 are R/O Vill Phulwaria(Rajia), P.S. Benipatti, Dist- Madhubani----- ------------------------------------------------------Opposite parties. ---------------------------------- 2 13.12.2011 The informant petitioner has filed this revision application against the judgment and order dated 3.9.2009 passed by learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Madhubani in Sessions Trial No. 97 of 1998 arising out of Benipatti P.S. Case No. 179 of 1994 by which the accused persons have been acquitted by giving them the benefit of doubt. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. It appears from the impugned order that learned trial court has considered the evidence on record and has found that the prosecution has not been able to prove its case beyond doubts and accordingly the accused persons have been acquitted by giving them benefit of doubt. After going through the judgment I find that the view taken by the trial court is also possible and I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. RPS ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)