1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3942 OF 2007 [Khushal Gulabrao chavan Vs. The State of Maharashtra & others] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.S.G.Thombre, Advocate for petitioner. Shri.V.B.Ghatge,A.G.P.for R.No.1 to 6. Shri.U.B.Bondar,Advocate for R.No.4,5 .... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 23RD JUNE, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner claims seniority. The respondent No.5 filed affidavit in reply. In Para No.6 it is stated that:- I say and submit that as the present petitioner was appointed on Secondary section his name is included in schedule-C. I further submit that the appointment given to respondent No.4 and the approval granted by the Education Officer is, therefore, legal one and can not be gone into by the 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders petitioner in view of the position that after considering all the documentary evidence, the Education Officer has approved the seniority list. The petitioner herein has not taken any objection when the seniority list was published and forwarded to the Education Officer for approval. I say and submit that when seniority list was prepared by the management the petitioner had consented the seniority list wherein the respondent No.4 was given seniority above the petitioner. 4. In the light of the reply filed by the respondent No.5, no interference is called for. We do not find any serious error in the order passed by the Education Officer. The Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/ Sd/- [K.K. TATED,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] MTK 3 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders