BENCf'i IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W. P. (S) No. €©/ 200® PETITIONERS RESPONDENT'S >xol^ '^y •-'1. Ramkrishna Pandey, S/o. Shri Rewa Prasad Pandey, aged about 37 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Churiya, Block - Korba, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) :,. 2. Shiv Kumar Gond (Sidar), S/o. Shri Amar Singh Gond, aged about - 39 years, Assistant Teacher/Superintendent, Tribal Hostel-Ajgarbahar, Block- Korba, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary Department of Tribal Welfare D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) , 2. Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, Chhattisgarh Government Raipur 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, District- Korba (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block- Korba, Distt- Korba (C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/22r" OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT. WRITS. DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P.rS) No. 77 of 2007 Petitioners : Smt. Manju Shrivastnva ond another Versus Respondents : S-tate of Chhatl-isgarh and others W. P.rS) No. 80 of 2007 Petitioners : Ramkrishna Pcndey and wiother Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh and others And W. P.fS) No. 83 of 2007 Petittoners : Smt. Shakun Mfluiikpuri aaTd another Versus Respondents : State of Chhatl-jsgarh and others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Present; Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, Advocate for -tfie petitioner(s). Mr. ^rvind Dubey, PoBiel lawyer for 'the respondents/State. ORbER (Passed on this 16th boy of Jonuary. 2007) 1. Lcamed counsel appearing for the petitioners cs well as for the Stort»/req»ondentsjointly aibmit that the facts of the present writ petitions are similar to that of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari <md others v& State fiovemment of Chhattisgarh <& others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. They further submit that the question of hw involved is also the same. 2. In view of the above stated submissions made by leamed counsel for the part-ies. these petitions are allowed in terms of the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by this Court in W.P. (&) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. Stnte 6ovemment of Othatfris9arh A others). No order as to costs, 3. A copy of this order be ploced on record in other comiected writ petition. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge