In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. FAO No. 853 of 2009 Decided on 14.1.2010. Ms. Rochana -- Appellant vs. Ajay Gautam --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Anuj Raura,Advocate, for the appellant Mr.G.N.Malik,Advocate,for the respondent. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J: (Oral) This appeal is directed against the order passed by the learned Guardian Judge, Chandigarh, dated 08.8.2008, whereby the petitioner/appellant has been granted visiting right/ interim custody of the child, namely Shivali once in a month from 2.30 p.m. to 3.30 p.m. in the Court room itself till she attains the age of majority with a direction to the respondent to bring the minor child for the purpose of meeting on every last Saturday of the month. The only argument raised by learned counsel for the appellant is that at the stage of interim custody, time granted by the learned Guardian Judge was from 3.p.m. to 5.p.m. It is submitted that there is no reason for reducing that period from 2 to 1 hour. At this stage, learned counsel for the respondent submits that FAO No.853 of 2009 -2- the respondent has no objection if the time is maintained from 3.p.m. to 5.p.m. for the purpose of meeting the child with the appellant in the Court room itself till she attains the age of majority, This satisfies the learned counsel for the appellant. In view of the above, this appeal is allowed only to the extent that the time period which has been granted by the learned Guardian Judge, Chandigarh vide the impugned order dated 0-8.8.2008, is modified from 2.30 p.m. to 3.30 p.m. to 3.p.m. to 5 p.m. January 14,2010 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge