IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 28TH BHADRA 1929 RP.No. 873 of 2007(A) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.21422/2006 Dated 18/07/2007 .................... PETITIONER: ----------------- SALIM MATHEW, S/O. MATHEW, AGED 38 YEARS, KOOVAPLACKAL HOUSE, KARIMKUNNAM, THODUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.M.J.THOMAS RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. VASU,S/O. PAPPU, SUNITHA BHAVAN, MURIYAMANGALAM KARA, MAMALA P.O., ERNAKULAM. 2. SUNITHA,D/O.RADHA,, SUNITHA BHAVAN, MURIYAMANGALAM KARA, MAMALA P.O. ERNAKULAM. 3. ANITHA,D/O.RADHA,SUNITHA BHAVAN MURIYAMANGALAM KARA, MAMALA P.O. ERNAKULAM. 4. SAJI K. JOHN, KOTTARATHU VEEDU, KARIMKUNNAM,THODUPUZHA. 5. THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., THODUPUZHA. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.No.873 of 2007 in W.P.(C) No.21422 of 2006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 19th September, 2007 ORDER Mr.M.J.Thomas, learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that the interim order passed by this court had been duly complied with and hence this court was not justified in dismissing the Writ Petition on the reason of non-compliance with the interim order. I find merit in the above submission. It is noticed that a submission to that effect had been made after the judgment was delivered by me. The Review Petition will stand allowed. The judgment sought to be reviewed is reviewed. Post the Writ Petition on top of the hearing list on 27.9.2007. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE