1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 902/2009 Meenu Verma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order : : 09.02.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. Sanjeet Purohit, for the petitioner. BY THE COURT Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner represented respondent No.2, District Education Officer (Primary), Sriganganagar vide representation dated 4.09.2008 and no order has been passed with regard to the grant of study leave. In my view, there could not have been any reason for the respondent No.2 in not deciding the representation filed by the petitioner. In this view of the matter, the respondent No.2, District Education Officer (Primary), Sriganganagar is directed to consider and decide the representation filed by the petitioner dated 4.09.2008 utmost expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of producing certified copy of this order. With these directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (H.R. PANWAR), J. rp