: i HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DiVISjONBENCH CORAM: HQN'BLESHRIRAJEEVGUPTA,C.J. HON'BLE SHRI SUN1L KUMAR SINHA, J, Appellants Claimants Misc. Appeal No.210 of 2005 1 Smt Premin Bai, Wd/o Duryodhan Tarak, Age 20 2 Tameshwar, s/o Duryodhan Tarak, Aged 5 months through Mother, Appetlant No.1 Both R/o Vill Rasani, PS & Teh Arang, Distt Raipur (CG) Respondents VERSUS 1. Videshi Ram Vishwakarma, S/o Shaikun Lohan, Age 35 years, Tractor Driver 2. Tek Singh, S/o Heera Singh, Tractor Owner Both No.1 & 2 R/o Tamashivni, PS & Teh Arang, Distt Raipur (CG) 3. The United India Insurnce Compan Ltd., Divisional Office, Kutchery Chowk, Jail Road, Raipur 4. Parau Ram, S/o Lakahan Lal Tarak, Age42 5. Fekan Bai, Wd/o Lakahan Lal Tarak, Age 63 Both No.4 & 5 R/o At & Post Tamashivni, PS Arang, Teh & Distt Raipur IVIiscetlaneous Appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act Present : Nonefortheappellants. Shri KK Dewangan, counsel for respondents No.1 and 2. Shri Dasarath Gupta, counsel Tor respondent No.3. None for respondents No.4 and 5. ORDER !th (15mApril,2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appeltants. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of proseeution. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge Nimmi 3^-