IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.3077 OF 1991 Bank of Maharashtra ...Plaintiffs Vs. Madhusudan Y. Laghate & Anr. ...Defendants Mr. Sundeep Bhimekar i/b. Wadia Ghandy & Co., for Plaintiffs CORAM: SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED: 23 RD OCTOBER, 2008 P.C. 1. Plaintiffs are stated to have been assigned their debt in the Suit to one Arcil. The Plaintiff's Advocate took instructions on the last date of hearing. 2. The Plaintiff's were directed to file affidavit of documents and evidence on the last date, failing which Suit was to be dismissed. The Plaintiffs' Advocate has written letters dated 13 th October, 2008 and 20 th October, 2008 to the Plaintiffs calling for instructions and informing them that the Suit will be dismissed if the directions are not followed. The Plaintiffs' Advocate also inquired of the address and the details of Arcil. The Plaintiffs' Advocate has not received instructions. The Suit, therefore, cannot be proceeded. Suit is dismissed. 3. The two letters of the Plaintiffs' Advocate are taken on record. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.)