HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1828 of 2009 ORDER: Heard both sides, and at their request, the revision petition itself is taken up for disposal. The petitioners herein are aggrieved against the orders in dismissing the applications seeking condonation of delay and to set aside the ex parte order in appeal. However, it is stated that as against the orders in appeal in A.S.No.16 of 2004, the petitioners have already filed a regular second appeal and the same is pending. In view of the same, it is always open for the petitioners to seek appropriate relief in the said second appeal including the one which is as sought to be contended in these applications. Hence, I do not find any justification to interdict the orders under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Subject to above, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________ Date: 15th October, 2009 B.PRAKASH RAO, J SKM