IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 21924 of 2004 Between: 1 Shaik Haji Basha, S/o. Late Mohiddin Saheb, Veligandla, Prakasam District. 2 Shaik Mahaboob Subani, S/o.Haji Basha, Kanigiri, Prakasam District,. 3 Shaik Humayun, S/o. Mahaboob, R/o. Singarayakonda (V&M) Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 State of A.P., rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole 3 Sriram, S/o. not known, Major, working as SI of Police, Kandukur Town P.S., Kandukur, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus : a) directing the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioner's personal life, liberty and that of other petitioners in any manner, b) directing the respondents not to book petitioner's and his family members in any false cases nor detain us in police lockups as they are innocents, having not committed any offence; c) directing the respondents to let them live peacefully without any fear from police constable visits, d) directing the respondents not to obstruct them while attending to our duties in their respective jobs at the stations of their work without any disturbance by the police; e) directing the respondents not to threaten and obstruct the petitioners while they are attending the cases in CC No. 167 of 2004 pending in court at Chirala and MC No. 4 of 2004 pending in court at Kandukur f) directing the 3rd respondent not to involve the petitioners in any further false cases nor interfere in any manner with their lawful pattern of life. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.SATYANARAYANA NIMMAGADDA Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR HOME The Court, at the admission stage, made the following : ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ------------------ 06.06.2005 DRK Copy to: 1 The Principal Secretary, State of A.P., Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole 3 Two CCs to the G.P. for Home, High Court of A.P., High Court buildings, Hyderabad (o.u.t.) 4 Two CD copies.