IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC(T) No.: 408 of 2008. Decided on: 28.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ Sunita Thakur. … Petitioner. Versus O.P. Sharma and another. …Respondents/Contemnors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate vice Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate. For the Respondents/ Contemnors : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): The direction issued by the learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal was that due and admissible salary to the petitioner be released within a period of two weeks. A sum of Rs.22,945/- has been released to the petitioner in case on 24.9.2003. The case of the petitioner is that she had been marking her presence with effect from 31.10.2002. However, this submission has been disputed by the respondents in the reply. This issue will now be considered at the time of hearing of the Original Application No.1762 of 2003. So far as this petition is concerned, the same is closed, so also 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - the pending application(s), if any. Copy of this order be placed in O.A. No.1762 of 2003. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 28, 2010. (sck).