C ‘&:(kagl/ BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF . CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION ls) No. 4t t9 12006 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF‘INDIA Smt. Sandhya Thakur, aged abOut 30 years, W/o Shri S.K. Thakur working as Staif nurse KD Hospltal Kanker Dlstt North Bastar Kanker reSIdent of PETITIONER / VIJIage malhar, Tah. Charama, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) P Pmmtedby R No ............................... n K }’< 1“ ........... dated...................I.....é... ................. VERSUS RESPONDENTS ’ , 1. / State of Chhattisgarh, through —— the Secretary, . Department of Health and Family Welfare, Dau - Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhatu'sgarh) The Dishict Collector, North Bastar, Kanker (C.G.) The Chief Medical & Health Ohicer, District Kanker North Bastar, (C-G-) The Block Medical and Health Omcer, Block Charama, Distt; North Bastar (Chhattisgarh) ] ... . XI—HC-78 HW,W,W§I rmWPNOqug. g3: 2006 , WW(W) $K§§>§3Tm am ahwm WWWW 1 0-08-2006 Shri A.V. Shridhar, couns el for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. G.A. for the respondents No.1 to 4, on advance copy. Heard. By the instant petition, order dated 6—7-2006 whereby K.D. Hospital, Kanker to Civii H The main grievance of years from the date of her appc thrice; initialiy she was posted 13-8-2004 she was transferred 7-3-2005 she was transferred period of another one year Pakhanjur. Learned counsei for the low paid staff nurse and she i therefore, the petitioner may respondent No.3 and he be dir counsel for the respondents h Having heard learned c unsel for the parties, having regard to the facts and circumstances of th case and without expressing any opinion on the merrt of the case th petrtroner rs allowed to make a detarted representation along wrth a co y of this petltron to respondent No 3 Within a penod of 10 days from todar and in turn, respondent No 3 shall decrde the representation within a p riOd of 3O days from the date of receipt of mm§ww %Wm :he petitioner has chailenged her transfer the petitioner has been transferred from )spitai Pakhanjur the petitioner is that w-thm a perrod of 3 mtment the petitioner has been transferred at Antagarh from where vide order dated to Amodha and thereafter vide order dated from Amodha to Kanker. Now, within a 4 months, she has been transferred to petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a ias been subjected to transfer every year, be allowed to make a representation to ected to decide the same, to which learned no objection. P.T.O. §§ XI—HC—78 W W , W , W mm ~ ..MJQ'J3/a'.$<11m.... m 2006 WW(W) mmmWW m WWW *1_ 55W aaW wm‘ ff fg‘z‘iW -—1’ the representation, after considering all the points raised by the petitioner, in accordance with law. However, the effect and. operation of the impugned order in respect of the petitioner shall remain stayed, tiii the representation of the petitioner 'is decided. With the direction aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.‘)P. “0.3201 12006 also stands disposed of. QC. as per Rules. //, Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Barve /\ i Judge wéo XQS @s‘g \ \ P.T.O.