IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30082 of 2009 RAM NARAYAN YADAV @ RAMA YADAV Versus CENTAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ----------- 2. 04.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner, an accused, in a Police case under Sections 302, 120B, 34 of the Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act, is in custody, was assigned the role of a conspirator and his bail application has been rejected, notwithstanding the fact that it was brought to the attention of the court below that other co- accused with allegation of conspiracy have been enlarged on bail by this Court, without any discussion of the distinguishing features with regard to the petitioner, which disentitles him the same privilege. Let the petitioner, abovenamed be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri A.K. Pathak, Additional Sessions Judge VI, Patna in Sessions Trial No. 2563 of 2008 arising out of RC-9(S)/2001/SIC-IV/ND. The apprehension of the counsel for C.B.I. at this stage is misconceived. If the petitioner defaults in appearance hereinafter and delays the trail, the court below has adequate powers to deal with him appropriately. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.) 2