THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 12658 of 2006 Dated: 23.11.2006 Between: M. Serabanda and others. .... PETITIONERS AND The A.P.Power Generation Corporation Limited, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad, rep. by its Chief General Manager (Admn). .....RESPONDENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 12658 of 2006 ORDER: Questioning the action of the respondent in not issuing Hall Tickets to the petitioners on the ground of non-submission of Provisional Certificates even though the same were submitted along with the application, the present writ petition is filed. 2. While admitting the writ petition on 23.06.2006, this Court gave an interim direction in WPMP No. 15712 of 2006, which is as under: It is the case of the petitioners that though they have submitted their applications, along with provisional certificates and necessary documents, for the post of Assistant Engineers, the respondent-Corporation have not issued Hall Tickets to enable them to sit in the examination to be held on 25.06.2006. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Corporation produced the original applications of the petitioners and submitted that some of the petitioners did not submit Provisional Certificates and some of the petitioners did not submit Caste Certificates. Whether the petitioners have submitted their applications along with necessary documents is a matter, which required detailed enquiry. Therefore, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Corporation is directed to file detailed counter in the matter. However, to protect the interest of the petitioners, the respondents are directed to issue Hall Tickets to the petitioners and permit them to appear for the examination to be held on 25.06.2006. However, they shall not declare the results of the petitioners until further orders. List the matter after six weeks. 3. The learned counsel for the respondent, reiterating the counter averments, submits that in pursuance of the direction of this Court in W.P.M.P.No.15712 of 2006 dated 23.06.2006, the petitioners were permitted to appear for the examination, but results are not declared. He further submits that though the petitioners were allowed to write the examination, they have not submitted the necessary certificates. The said contention is denied by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Inasmuch as pursuant to the interim orders of this Court, the respondents permitted the petitioners to appear for the examination conducted on 25.06.2006, I am of the opinion that the interests of justice would be met if the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to declare the result of the petitioners. Hence, the writ petitioner is disposed of with the following directions: The respondent is directed to declare the results of the petitioners, who appeared for the written examination, held on 25.06.2006. No costs. _______________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 23.11.2006 sj/ksr `