FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1331 OF 2010 (Shrshrao s/o Maruti Rautrao & ors. Vs. Venkatrao Govindrao Rautrao) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Shri M.L. Dharashive, Advocate for the petitioners ... CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 27th October, 2010 1. Heard. In Regular Civil Suit No.509/2006 before the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ausa, an application for appointing Court Commissioner was moved by the defendant, rejection thereof on 2.12.2009 is impugned. 2. In the application, 5 counts are illustrated, seeking appointment of Commissioner. These are the factual events, which defendant himself will reasonably be in a position to demonstrate in his evidence. The Commissioner was not imperative to be appointed. No reasons, plausible or acceptable, were demonstrated in application. No infirmity in the order is noticed. Writ Petition lacks merits. Hence, it is dismissed. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE fmp/wp1331.10