IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 555 of 2010. Kalicharan S/O Ram Nandan and 12 others. … Petitioners. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and two others. …Respondents. Mr. S.S.Yadav, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. N.P.Sah, Standing Counsel, learned counsel for the respondents. Date September 27, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to release 60% arrears of 6th Pay Commission and bonus of financial year 2008-2009 and other pending arrears. Petitioners have also prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to take a decision on the representation dated 24-12-2009 (Annexure No. 3 to the writ petition). During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has urged that the petitioners had made representations before the District Magistrate/Records Officer, Udham Singh Nagar on 1-12-2009 and 24-12-2009 (Annexure Nos. 2 and 3 to the writ petition), which are still pending for disposal. Learned counsel submitted that the ends of justice would be served if the authority concerned is directed to decide the representations made by the petitioner within a time bound period and the writ petition may be disposed of today. Prayer is innocuous. 2 In the above circumstances, the District Magistrate Udham Singh Nagar-respondent no.2 is directed to decide the representations made by the petitioners (Annexure Nos. 2 and 3 to the petition), expeditiously preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP