C^^ffl^^- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (•C.G.I WRIT PETITION (S) N0. lot63 QF 2010 PETITIONER L\^t^: ^.?%$?-""" ..-.%^>" yy RESPONDENTS 1. 2: 3;^ R. D. Singh Son of Late Shri Lalji Singh, aged about 74 years, Retired Executive Engineer, Resident of Mahuapara Fundurdihari, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through: the Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Chief Engineer, Hasdeo Kachhar, Water Resources Department, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). The Executive Engineer (Electric/Engineering), Light Machinery, Tube Well and Gates Division Sakri, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). <-' 4. The Secretary, Retiral Dues Pension Committee, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). WRFT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA )B1I@!iaaM'»n! HIGH COURT OF CHHATrtSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1269 of 2010 PETITtONER : R.D.Singh. RESPONDENTS VERSUS : State of ChhatUsgarti & Others. -? Writ Pedtbn Under Artide 226 Of The Constitution Of India SB: Hon'bte Shri SaUsh K. Aanlhotri. J. AlTBt Present Shri V.K.Pandey, Advocate for the petlttoner. Shri P.KBhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORALORDER (Passedon261h dayof Mareh,2010) With the consent of leamed counsel appearing for tte parties, the matter Is heaid finally. 1. Leamed counselappearing for the petitioner submits that the case, betng payment of retiral benrfts matter, may be referred to the penaon committee. 2. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baynatti Mandal v. The Siate <^ Chhattisgaih S Oitiw^ and other connected maters, direded the Committee <D consider Ihe matter of retiral dues as the disputed quesh'on of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Govemment, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1Q6tB006(SfntKyaB3/Cfia/«ff3/carys. StateGovemmentandottief^aivi order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of ^08 (Stete (rf ChhaWsgaih & CMieis v. Baljnath Mandal aivl analhei). Thus, this petitton is squarely covered by the ju(^ment and order dated 31" of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Baijnalti Mandal (supt^ as submitted by temed counsel appearing for the parties. 3. Witti the consent of ttie parfes, this petitton is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate Geneial js dlrected to send the case to the Committee, wlttiin a period of 15 days from the date of recelpt ofa copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitloner and the officers concemed, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall conskter and pass order, in accotdance witt) law, atter affoiding proper opportunlty of hearing to the petitimer. The petitioner and the officers concerred may fite additional documents, if necessary. The entire e)®rcise,induding payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed withln a period of four nwnths from the date of receiptof a copy of this oider. 4. The petitioner shall supply extra copy of the petidon to ttie tearned counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding the same to the Committee. I.^0*" ^^^