IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTCE OF MOTION NO.390 OF 2005 IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2557 of 2004 PETITION NO.2557 of 2004 PETITION NO.2557 of 2004 Jayraj Chhotelal Arya ..Petitioner Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai,. ..Respondents None for the petitioner Mrs. A.K. Savla, for the Respondents CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: DATE: DATE: 1ST DECEMBER, 2006 1ST DECEMBER, 2006 1ST DECEMBER, 2006 P.C. . When the matter is called out none present for the petitioner. By the present Motion the petitioner seeks police protection for repairs/construction of a shop. From the order passed in the appeal on October 14, 2004 we find that the petition has been disposed off. Secondly the only direction issued was to permit the petitioner to recostruct/repair the Pitch No.23 in accordance with law. The pensioner had filed Civil Suit which was decreed. The course open to the petitioner is either to apply for execution of the decree or for execution of the order of this Court. The present motion is not maintainable as has been filed without application of mind. Hence Motion dismissed with costs quantified at Rs.2,000/- to be paid by the petitioner to the Corporation. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA J). V. MOHTA J). V. MOHTA J).