C-f: [^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. (S)_No^_q, 6 LA /2007 Petitioner '*^.~'' 1,v i- .lf ^ .^^. ^yy ^^sA?--'" ./o.y' ^•^ Madanlal Chandrakar S/o Shri Miirit Ram Chandrakar, Aged about 37 years, Asst. Teacher, Prathmik Shala Chuchurungpur, Post - Ouda, Block - Kawardha, Distt : Kabirdham (C.G.) Versus Respondents ^ ^- (<)°' State of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretaty School Education Department, Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.O.) District Education OfBcer, Kawardha, District- Kabirdham (C.O.) WRIT PETITION UNDER SECTION 226.0FTHE CONSTITUTION_OF INDIA ^ ^^v" 2. ^' XI-HC-78 3:E? •<11<<ICI*1, yTflti'IS, RlCIIUy li3. p. C&-> ^°. 3o4f/tf7 @ *TwpfT a>^ra» W=[ 200 311^1 iat»)(>{qFgq<^r) sn^T^rfq^N; cCTan^rOTw ,^< SiAhash ^ STdTWCTfeT'W^T 22.01.2007 Mr. beepak Jain, counsel for| Ms. Sunifa Jain, Panel Lawyei|" With the consent of parties, the wr-it petition is heard Common order dicfated in open Court, passed separotely. A copy of this order be connectad writ petitions. counsel appearing for the fpnally ond disposed of. W|rit Petitfon (5) No. 304/20)7 in Iplaced on the record of the +i<il'<-i'sfl-i ^Wvfi ff tei3'<,Ri+iii< ^srf^ffsn^TT the petitioner(3). for the State/respondents. Sd/- Satish K. Agnillotri Judge P.T.O. HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISSARH AT BILASPW SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. 5ATLSH K. ASNIHOTRI. J. WRFT PETmON (5.) No. 304 OF 2007 Petitioner ; Madantal Chandrokar versus State of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETTTION (S.) No. 305 OF 2007 Petitioner ; Birendra Kumar Chandravanshi yerais State of Chhatfisgarh and another Present : Mr. Deepak Jain, counsei for the petitioner(s). Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. •s^ ORDER yassed on 1+iis 22nd t>ay of January, 2007) Learned counse! appearing for tiie petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointty submit that the facts and question of taw involved in the present writ petitjons are squarely covered by •ftie decision of this Court in the case of yashvmntfXiWar Bhar-adwaj vs. Municipat Corporation, Owy and anothei^. 2. For •ttie aforementioned reasons, these writ pe+itions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of YashHwnt ^imar- Shwadwaj (5upra), subject to yenfication of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T-I. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and fur-f+ier whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on 1+ie record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006 (H) MPJR-C6 96 Subhash 1