Criminal Misc.-M No.25095 of 2011 (O&M) --1-- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.25095 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.12.2011 Surinder Kaur .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI Present:- Mr. P.N. Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Sushma Chopra, Addl. A.G., Haryana. ---- M.M.S. BEDI, J.(Oral) The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR in a case registered at the instance of Mandeep Kaur, alleging that the petitioner alongwith his daughter and her husband had started leaving their son-Parminder Singh with the complainant on the pretext that Parminder Singh was to be married to the complainant with the consent of all the family members. The main accused allegedly developed illicit relation and committed rape on different occasions. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no allegation against the petitioner and the main accused is her son. Learned State counsel in the reply filed by Deputy Superintendent of Police, informs that the main accused is proclaimed offender and charges have been framed against the petitioner and others. Two witnesses have already been examined. In view of the said circumstances, it is not deemed appropriate to enter into the nicety of the trial court to appreciate the Criminal Misc.-M No.25095 of 2011 (O&M) --2-- evidence which is being produced after framing of charges. The petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the pleas of defence before the trial court. Dismissal of the petition not in any way prejudice the rights of the petitioner during the trial. (M.M.S. BEDI) JUDGE 16.12.2011 sonika