1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 251 OF 2009 Upendra Ramji Rai ...Petitioner Versus Administration of the Union Territory of Dadra & Nagar Haveli & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Mihir Gheewala for the Petitioner Mr. K.V. Saste, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 2009 P.C.:- The charge-sheet has already been filed, which is sought to be challenged in this Writ Petition. 2. The petitioner has the remedy of approaching the trial Court, and pleading that no charge is made out against him and getting discharged. He submits that earlier, he had filed a petition, in which this Court had passed some orders, and the trial Court may get influenced by 2 those orders. The orders passed earlier are those orders with respect to the material already collected against the petitioner. 3. Whenever the case is heard for framing of charge, the trial Court shall decide independently whether a charge is made out against the accused or not, and proceed in the matter accordingly. The petition is disposed of. BILAL NAZKI, J. ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.