THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.8522 of 2011 Dated 09th November, 2011 Between: R.Srinivas …Petitioner And Government of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue (Ex.II) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, rep.by its Principal Secretary and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri S.V.Ramana Counsel for respondents: AGP for Prohibition & Excise The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the order of the 4th Respondent dated 26.03.2011 as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 4th Respondent to permit the petitioner to cross examine the witness.” At the hearing, Sri S.V.Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.Nos.10594 and 10595 of 2011 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 09th November, 2011 VGB