^^ ^o' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAKH : BILASPUR Wnt PetitionJCLNo, 7406_of20Q7 Petitioner Dindayal Agrawal, S/o Amilal Agrawal, aged about 65 years, R/o Dabhara Road, Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Versus Respondents l. State of Chliattisgarh, fhrough fhe Secretaiy, Public Works Departmeiit, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Muiucipal CouncU, Kharsia, through C. M.0. Kharaia, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. The CoUector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 4. The Sub Divisional Officer, P.W.D. Kharsia, Dista-ict Raigarh (C.G.) 5. The Tahsildar, Kharsia, D»trict Raigarh (C.G.) (Writ Petitioa underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution ofludia) (SB: Honlle Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri Aiuit Sharma, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri ABirito Das, Paael Lawyer for the respondents No. 1, 3, 4 & 5. Shri A. S. Kachwaha, Advocate for the respondent No.2. O RD B R (oral) (Passed on fhis 17ril day ofJuly, 2009) Heard. Leamed cozinsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, subniits that the petitioner seeks permissipn of this Court to withdraw fhe writ petition with liberly to make a representation to fhe concemed auttiority for aUotiuent of altemative shop under fhe Schenie ofMukhya Mantri Swavlamban Yojua. Shri A. S. Kacliwaha, leanied couasel appearing for fhe respondent No.2 subinits that if fhe petitioner uiakes a representation within a period of one week, fhe same shall be consUered aad decided, in accerdaace with law, by the concemed aufhority, wifhin a period oftwo weeks. In view of fhe foregoing, the petition is disnussed as wifhdrawn, with the above-stated Uberty. No order asto costs. Tbakur Sd/- Satish K. A^ Judge ^-7