1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 14. CP/170/2009 In WP/909/1990 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. V.D.Sapkal, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. G.K.Thigale, Adv., for respondent no.2. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:12-3-2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard. Mr. Thigale, Counsel, has furnished compliance report on behalf of the Municipal Council, Beed, dt.11.10.2010, signed by Chief Officer. Copy received by the Counsel for the petitioner. 2. Heard Mr.Sapkal. Though report of compliance is filed, Mr.Sapkal has a grievance. A toilet erected by the Municipal Council is apparently in breach as it is crossing the development line and amounts to an encroachment. Mr. Thigale, on 2 instructions, informs, it was a construction by the Municipal Council to facilitate public utility - if it is demolished immediately, it will create problems for the public at large. He says, inspite of such odds, the Municipal Council will remove the public toilet within 6 months. With above aspect, the contempt petition is disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/170-09cp