IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. No. 4299 of 2011. Decided on 30th June, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Gopal Chand Dutta. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Mahesh Sharma, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent No. 3. : Mr. S.C. Sharma, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Mahesh Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present writ petition in order to enable his client to make a representation against the transfer order dated 25th May, 2011 (Annexure P-2), whereby he has been transferred from Branch Office Nahan to Branch Office Pooh. The representation be made to the Managing Director of respondent No. 3-Bank within a period of two weeks from today. Thereafter, the same shall be decided by the Managing Director within a further period of three weeks after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. Taking into consideration the totality of circumstances, the Managing Director is directed to ensure that the petitioner shall 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - not be transferred to a far off place by way of punishment. Till the decision on representation, the petitioner shall not be disturbed. 2. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge June 30, 2011. (bhupender) - 3 - `