IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12610 of 2010 1. AJAY KUMAR S/O LATE PARMANAND SINGH EX-ASSISTANT TEACHER IN HIGH SCHOOL, HASANPUR, LAKHISARAI, R/O VILL.- RAHIMPUR, P.S. AND DISTT.- KHAGARIA 2. ANIL KUMAR S/O SRI BALBHADRA PRASAD SINGH CLERK, POSTED IN HIGH SCHOOL, HASANPUR, LAKHISARAI 3. KAMAL RAM S/O LATE JAGO RAM EPON, POSTED IN HIGH SCHOOL, HASANPUR, LAKHISARAI 4. UMESH KUMAR S/O SRI BHAIRAV ANAND SINGH PEON, POSTED IN HIGH SCHOOL, HASANPUR, LAKHISARAI-----PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY SECONDARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR SCHOOL SERVICE BOARD, GANDHI MAIDAN, PATNA 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, LAKHISARAI, DISTT.- LAKHISARAI---------------------------RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 4.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Since the petitioner fails to demonstrate any of the provisions or rules or Bihar Finance rule or any other circular on the issue, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the decision rendered in annexure-5 because the respondents have done no wrong in holding that as there are no rules under which interest can be given on delayed payment of salary, the respondent Director has committed no error. If the decision is based on the prevalent circulars and rules on such issue there is no reason why the correct decision has to be interfered despite the correct rational and reasonings given therein. Therefore annexure-5 does not warrant any interference. This writ application has no merit and it is dismissed. If the petitioner wants to avail any common law remedy, let him do so. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)