IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.170 of 2006 In (LPA 407/2005) Rajendra Sah …………………………....Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar & Ors………………..Opposite parties. For the petitioner : Mr. Surendra Kumar Choubey, Advocate. For the opposite parties : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, G.P.-15 ---------------------------------- 05/ 24.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties. This petition has been filed by the petitioner for review of order dated 18.05.2005 by which L.P.A. No.407 of 2005 was dismissed. Admittedly the petitioner claimed to be a pre-emptor and had lost before the Revenue Authorities as well as before learned Single Judge, who had recorded a finding that the petitioner (pre-emptor) as well as the respondents (transferees) both were co-sharers and adjacent raiyats of the vended land as was apparent from the sale deed in which the transferees had been shown as boundary raiyats. From perusal of the materials on record, this court does not find any error apparent on the face of the record nor does it find any fresh material to take a different view. Accordingly, this civil review petition is dismissed. Harish (S.N. Hussain, J.) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)