IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2011 / 1ST ASWINA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3238 of 2011() ------------------------------------- CC.NO.435/2011 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, PERINTHALMANNA .................... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED 1 - 5 ---------------------------------------------- 1. MOHAMMED IQBAL, S/O.MOIDUTTY MUSALIAR, KOTHAMADATHIL HOUSE, CHEMMALASSERY, PULAMANTHOLE, PERINTHALMANNA. 2. SUHARA, W/O.ABDULLAH, MELATHIL HOUSE, P.O.VALAPURAM, PULAMANTHOLE, PERINTHALMANNA. 3. ABDUL NAZAR, S/O.ALIYAMMU VAIDYAR, KAIPPURAM, THIRUVEGAPURAM, VILAYOOR. 4. MOHAMMED ALI, S/O.MOIDUTTY MUSALIYAR, KOTHAMADATHIL HOUSE, CHEMMALASSERY, PULAMANTHOLE, PERINTHALMANNA. 5. ABDUL JALEEL, S/O.MOIDUTTY MUSALIYAR, KOTHAMADATHIL, CHEMMALASSERY, PULAMANTHOLE, PERINTHALMANNA. BY ADV. SRI.MANSOOR.B.H. RESPONDENT(S): DEFACTO COMPLAINANT & STATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. SHAMNA, D/O.MOIDUPPA,ILLATHODI HOUSE, MOORKANADU AMSOM, VENGADU.PIN-679 338 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, REPRESENTING STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOLATHUR POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. R1 BY ADV.SRI.AMJAD ALI R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAYASURYA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/09/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts CRMC.NO.3238/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEX A COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CC NO.435/2011 PENDING ON THE FILES OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATES COURT-I, PERINTHALMANNA. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.3238 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of September 2011 O R D E R Petitioners are the accused in C.C.No.435/2011 of Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Perinthalmanna. The offence alleged against them is under Sec.498A r/w 34 IPC. The de facto complainant therein is the first respondent, who is represented by her counsel in this Court. An affidavit has been filed by the de facto complainant to the effect that the parties aforesaid have settled the matter and so she has no grievance against the accused. The learned counsel appearing for both sides submit that in view of the settlement arrived at, further proceeding in the aforesaid case may be quashed. Since the dispute is between family members and purely personal in nature, I am inclined to allow this petition. Hence, this Crl.M.C. is allowed. Further Crl.M.C. No.3238 of 2011 -: 2 :- proceeding in C.C.No.435/2011 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Perinthalmanna is quashed. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt