... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1276 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1276 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1276 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1219 OF 2006 Shankar Kundlik Kamble ...Applicant Versus Yewat Police Station & Anr. ...Respondents Shri Y.J.Mastar for the Applicant. Shri D.P.Adsule, A.P.P for the State. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 11, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 11, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 11, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The conviction of the Applicant is for offences under section 452 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code. The maximum substantive sentence is rigorous imprisonment for three years. It is not in dispute that the Applicant was on bail throughout the trial. 2. Appeal is not likely to be heard before the period of substantive sentence is over in view of the pendency of very large number of old Appeals in this court. Hence, the Applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. ... 2 ... 3. Hence, I pass the following order: (i) The Applicant shall be enlarged on the bail on the same terms and conditions on which he was enlarged during the pendency of trial subject to filing fresh bail bonds. (ii) In addition to the conditions which were already imposed while granting bail during the pendency of trial, it is directed that the Applicant will report to Yewat Police Station, District Pune on first Saturday of every calendar month till the disposal of the Appeal. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE