In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh F.A.O. No. 3354 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: October 20, 2009 Mubarik .. Appellant Vs. Ashok Kumar Dhingra and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Sandeep Jasuja, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate for the respondent No.3. A.N. Jindal, J CM No.14872-CII of 2009 For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay in re-filing the appeal is condoned. Civil Misc. application is allowed. FAO No.3354 of 2009 Notice of motion qua respondent No.3 only. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No.3-Insurance Company. After hearing rival contentions raised by the learned counsel for both the parties, it may be observed that the claimant had suffered 15 injuries. Dr. S.K. Batta, has deposed that the claimant was brought in the hospital on 7.2.2006 and was x-rayed for the injuries. He also proved copy of the treatment chart Ex.P-1 and MLR Ex.P12. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the Tribunal has awarded meager compensation for the pecuniary loss he suffered and for pain and sufferings which he underwent. However, with the consensus of both the parties, the claimant is awarded compensation to the tune of Rs.15,000/- over and above the award amount which would be paid by the insurance company within 45 days from the date of receipt of the copy of the order failing which the claimant would be entitled to recover interest at the same rate as awarded by the Tribunal. October 20, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge