1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.40 OF 2011 Karimsha s/o Ramjusha Shah (Fakir) VERSUS Amirshah s/o Ramjusha Shah (Fakir) and others ......................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ......................................................................................................................................... Shri C.A.Joshi, Counsel for the Applicant. Shri M.G.Sarda, Counsel for the Respondents. CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 01. JULY, 2011. This revision application challenges the order dated 10.1.2011 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Malegaon in R.D.No.22 of 2009. The objection raised by the judgment debtor that second Darkhast was not maintainable, has been rejected by the Trial Court. It has been held that the said Darkhast has been filed within a period of 12 years from the date of dismissal of earlier Darkhast for non-compliance of the Court’s order and it has been held that the said Darkhast is maintainable. No fault can be found .....2/- 2 with the finding recorded by the Executing Court. Shri C.A.Joshi, the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant, has urged that the objection regarding Commissioner’s report has not been dealt with. However, that cannot be the subject-matter of this civil revision application. The Regular Darkhast is pending and all such objections shall be decided in the regular course, by the Executive Court. In view of above, no interference is called for. The civil revision application is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE BrWankhede ...../-