IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI BILAL NAZKI, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT APPEAL NO : 994 of 2005 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 19/07/2002 in WP NO : 13018 OF 2002 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Madhav, S/o.Jalba, R/o.Pholla Nagar, Bhainsa, Adilabad Dist. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The Hon'ble Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Godavarikhani, rep.by its presiding officer. 2 The Depot Manager APSRTC, Bhainsa Depot, Bhainsa, Adilabad Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.G.RAVI MOHAN Counsel for Respondent No.1: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for Respondent No.2:Smt Jyothi Kiran, Standing Counsel for APSRTC The Court made the following : J U D G M E N T (Per the Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, ACJ): The appellant was terminated from service on the charge that he had received fare from two passengers, but not given tickets to them. On facts, the charge against the appellant was proved during enquiry and also before the Chairman, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court. The award was finally challenged in the writ petition and the learned Single Judge also came to the conclusion that factually the charge has been proved by Exs.M1 to M21 and also by the petitioner’s explanation. Since the charge against the appellant has been proved factually, we do not find any ground to interfere either with the award or with the judgment of the learned Single Judge. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________ (Bilal Nazki, ACJ) 18th July, 2005 __________________ (G.Chandraiah,J) vrn To 1 The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Godavarikhani. 2 The Depot Manager APSRTC, Bhainsa Depot, Bhainsa, Adilabad Dist. 3 Two C.Cs to the G.P. for Labour, High Court Buildings, A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 4 Two C.D copies.