THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P.No. 4826 of 2011. ORDER: This revision is directed against the order dt. 23.6.2011 of the learned V Additional Jr. Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam rejecting the revision petitioners’/plaintiffs’ application I.A.No. 167 of 2011 in O.S.No. 123 of 2005 seeking reopening of the suit to enable the petitioner to file a petition for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for localizing and identifying the relevant survey numbers of the suit property with the help of Mandal Surveyor and based on registered document No. 49 of 1936 and 2563 of 1958, field books and village map etc., In 1995 the suit was filed by the revision petitioner for permanent injunction in respect of the suit property located in S.No. 94/3B. The respondents in the written statement filed in April, 2005 clearly asserted that the subject matter of the suit property is covered by S.No. 94/3B1 and not S.No. 94/3B which is their property; that the plaintiffs do not have any right over the suit property; that in their property constructions are being made; and the property was gifted to them under a registered gift deed dt. 9.7.2004. Trial in the suit commenced and evidence on behalf of the plaintiffs and defendants has also been recorded. The matter was posted for arguments and at that stage I.A.No. 167 of 2011 was filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs seeking reopening of the suit for filing a petition for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner. This application was rejected by the court below as an attempt to gather evidence through an Advocate Commissioner. This Court discerns no error in the application of law or exercise of discretion by the court below, warranting revisional interference under Article 227 of the Constitution. There are no merits in the revision, which is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 11.11.2011. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P.No. 4826 of 2011. ORDER: Dt. 11.11.2011.