IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P. No. 1168 of 2010 Decided on: 15th July, 2010. Ram Chand ….Petitioner Versus Jai Ram & others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the Petitioner: Mr. Anand Sharma, Advocate For Respondents No 1 & 4.: Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate For Respondent No. 2: Mr. Naveen Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate For Respondent No. 3: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K.Verma, Dy. A.G. __________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner is aggrieved since the lease arrangement, through the Society, has been sought to be terminated by the second respondent- Municipal Council. Learned counsel for the Municipal Council submits that steps were taken on two grounds; (i) it was submitted before the Council, through Vice President of the Society that Society did not require the room and (ii) there was arrear of rent. 2. According to the petitioner, he is still member of the Society and the Society has not yet resolved to vacate the room. Be that, as it may. It is seen that the petitioner has cleared all the arrears of rent. The petitioner shall continue to deposit the current rent before the 10th of every month. It will be open to the second respondent to take fresh decision in the matter, with notice to the Society and the petitioner. Subject to the liberty, as above, the impugned orders are set aside since the petitioner has deposited the rent and there is a direction to continue to deposit the rent. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 15th July, 2010(K) (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge