w.p.tsrNo. $3235? /2oo9 PETITIONER gA'vtar Singh, S/o shri Harbansh Singh , aged abhut 38 years, working as Sahayak Pashu Chikitsha Khhetra Adhikari at Pashu Aushadhalaya Ameri, Distt. Durg (C.G.) R/o Bhilai New Khurshipar Ward No. 36 Punjabi Colony Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS 1. X§£ate of Chhattisgarh, Thev Secretary, Krishi Pashupalan Vibhag, Mantralaya, D.K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Deputy Seeretary ' Krishi Pashupalan Vibhag, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan ‘Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS Through- \N IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w eingb Beam Qg Va 3. g“ “The Director Pashu Chikitsha Services Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Collector Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 5. The Deputy Director ‘ Pashu Chikitsha, Services Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 6. K.G.Rao S/o Late K.Papa Rao, aged about 40 years, R/o Govt. Quarter Shaskiya Pashu Prajanan Prakhetra, Anjora, Distt. Durg (C. G‘.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE N CONSTITUTION OF INDIA M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTlsgARH : BILASPUR REsPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Wi'it petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of :ndia) Single Bench : Hon‘bie Shri Sat§sh K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Jitendra Gupta, counset far the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri! F’anet Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed an this 14‘“ day 0t September, 2009) With the consent of learned counsei appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finaiiy. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the’petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage; however, he seeks tibezty to make a representation to the respondent authorities, within a period of three days and prays that tiii decision on the representation of the petitioner the respondents may be directed not to take any coeroive steps against him. Learned counsei appearing for the submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits. within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation after affording an opportunity of hearing to the respondent No.6 also, as if adverse decision is taken 'the respondent No.6 may be adversely attested. ln view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. However, on the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is made clear that there shali not be any coercive stepsagainst the petitioner tiil disposal of the representation. Sd/- ' Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri raee‘, ‘ \ WRIT PETiTlON (S) No.5232 OF 2009 §/)( PETiTiONER Avtar Singh Versus