IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 818 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 818 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 818 OF 2008 Dr.Akshay Chandrakant Mohite .... Applicant versus Central Bureau of Investigation & anr... Respondent. Shri S.V.Marwadi for the applicant Mrs. A.S.Pai for Respondent no.1. Mr. Y.M.Nakhawa APP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 19TH MARCH, 2008 DATED; 19TH MARCH, 2008 DATED; 19TH MARCH, 2008 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. Heard the learned counsel. Taken up for final disposal by consent. 2. This Court by an oder dated 20-2-2008 passed in Criminal Application Nos. 149/08 and 189/08 has set aside the impugned oder dated 4-1-2008 passed by the Sessions Judge and has directed the Sessions judge to decide the applications afresh after affording reasonable opportuity of hearing to both the sides. In otherwords, this court has remanded the matter for re-adjudication to the Sessions Judge. Obviously the order passed by this court on 20-2-2008 related to the applicants in the said two Criminal Revision Applications, who are Dr. Abhay Chandrakant Mohite and Mr. Vijay Krishna Chavan. By the present Criminal Application, the accused no.3 seeks modification of the order dated 20-2-2008 restricting it to the accused nos.1 and 2 who happens to be the applicants in the Criminal Revisions. It is obvious that the present applicant had neither preferred any application as there was no order passed against him by the Sessions judge nor was he heard before the order dated 20-2-2008 came to be passed. It is thus clear that the impugned order has been set aside only to the extent it relates to the applicants in the above Criminal Applications and not in relation to the present applicant. Hence the prayer for modification of the order made in this application deserves to be granted. 3. In the result, Criminal Application is allowed. The common order dated 20-2-2008 passed in Criminal Application Nos.149/08 and 189/08 is modified and restricted to the applicants in the said Criminal Applications. It is clarified that the order dated 4-1-2008 passed by the Sessions Judge to the extent it relates to the present applicant has not been set aside. With this modification and clarification, the application is disposed of. ....