Writ Petitton (S) No. 1573 ofa»8 PeSitioner Liladhar Sao, S/o. Shri Motital Sao, Aged about 39 years; Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary Sohool, Sangitarai, Biook Education Office: Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG). Versus ^ Respondents 1) State of Chhattisgarh through the Seoretary, School Educational Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distriot Raipur (CG}. 2) District Education Officer, Distriot Raigarh (CG). 3) Block Education Offlcer, Biock Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG). (Writ Petition under Artiole 226 of the Constitution of India) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, <1. Present: Shri SanjayPatel, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 12-3-2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned oounsel appearing for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts and questlon of iaw, involved In the present writ petition, are the same asto that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (U) BflP.JR •CS 96), which has been disposed of vide order dated 3-4-2006 and the order dated 7-2-2007 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No. 697 of 2007 (A.N.V. Satyanaiayan and othsrs Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others). 2} Aocordingly, the writ petition is allowed in temns of the order passed in the case Sf Yashwant Kumar Bhardadwaj (supra) and A.N.V. Satyanarayan (supra), subject to verification of the fact asto whet'ner the petitioner has acquired B.Ed/D.Ed/B.T.i./M.Ed. Examination Ceitificate on his own expenses, as per the '•« niey '^nL«stf8« ^w^'^..^-_^^.»^-»^^ ,, '1^ - -;,£ooi^^°ON'lou'os<u°3,,,^^ p^P ^0 .^, pue W^^ '^6'"'6"' ,^^^nlpue666l'"e'i'puoaw" seu, su ..^'^.s^. 0 S "l 1. S 1 ^ '&h..,»i ''^S.yS ••i-1 : ^ ," SB-^^