1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1 OF 2010 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.249 OF 2008 Ms. Elizabeth & Ors. ...Applicants/Petitioners. v. Mrs. Rosely Xavier & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Santosh Shetty i/by Vinay J. Hegde, advs., for the applicants/petitioners. Smt.K.K.Soran, adv. for the respondent no.2/M.C.G.M. CORAM : J.H.Bhatia, J. DATE : 8th October, 2010 P.C.: 1 Contempt Petition was dismissed against the respondent nos.3 and 4 due to failure to serve the respondent nos.3 and 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that the respondent no.3 was infact served as he declined the notice. As far as respondent no.4 is concerned, fresh address is given for service. Therefore, application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (c). Amendment be effected immediately. (J.H.BHATIA, J.) 2