-^' <; M^ HISH COURT OF CHHATTtSGARH, BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Cr.WI.P.JMO.142/2006 ^ Ratan Kumar Mishra, S/o Shri Mudrika Prasad Mishra, aged about 38 years, Resident of Ghurehatta (Payasin Tola) Police Statjon — MauganJ, DistrictRewa (M.P.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh 2. Smt. Shyamlata Mishra, W/o Ratan <'l<umar Mishra.agsd about 33 years, f:R/o Banglapara, Chakradhar Nagar, M Raigarh(C.G.) PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 Cr.P.C. Appearance: Shri Amit Kumar, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Panel LawyerfortheState. ORALORDER (18.07.2007) SUNILKUMARSINHA.J. Heard. This is a petition filed againstthe order of issuanceof process under Section 204 of Cr.P.C. After arguing for a long time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this petition with a liberty to file a duly constituted revision before the concerned Sessions Court. The prayer is allowed. The petition is dismissed, as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour ofthe petitioner. At thisstage, learnedcounsel for the petitionersubmitsthat there would be hurdle qf limitation.in filing the revision. Needless to say thatthe law of limitation provides provision for seeking condonatipnand thepetitioner rtay avail this provisionjvhile_ filing the revision, if such an exigency arjses. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge '•^•^y^ ""s^^ •', •j