IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 8TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26029 of 2011(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- PATTAPPA GAUNDAR, S/O. CHENNIYAPPA, CHUNDAPPETTY, PUDUR P.O., MANNARKADU, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.MANSOOR.B.H. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SUB-REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE AGALI SUB-REGISTRAR, MANNARKKADU, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN-678 581. SR GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 26029 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO.1261/1983 DTD.12.3.83 OF AGALI SUB-REGISTRY (REGD.ON 14.3.83)EXECUTED BY KUMARAN, SON OF RANGAN IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2 : A TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DTD.8.8.11 ISSUED BY THE PUDUR VILLAGE OFFICE IN RESPECT OF EXHIBIT P1 PROPERTY PURCHASED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P3 : A TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DTD.8.8.2011 ISSUED BY THE PUDUR VILLGE OFFICE IN RESPECT OF EXHIBIT P1 PROPERTY PURCHASED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4 : A TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DTD.6.4.11 ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE INTENDED PURCHASED SHRI. M.R.GINISH. EXT.P5 : A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD.29.8.11 IN WPC NO.23239/2011 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).26029/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 30th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner is the owner of 2 Acres and 5 Cents of property purchased by Ext.P1 document. It is stated that he wants to sell the property and an agreement for sale has been entered into. However, he apprehends that the respondent will not register the documents in the absence of NOC from the revenue authorities. Therefore the writ petition has been filed seeking a direction for registration of the documents. 2. Similar issue has been considered by this Court in several cases. One such judgment is Ext.P5 where it has been held that persons like the petitioner are entitled to get the documents registered without production of any NOC. 3. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is also disposed of directing that if the documents submitted by the petitioner is otherwise valid in all respects, that will be accepted and registered. However, I clarify that such registration of the documents will not stand in the way of the revenue authorities or W.P.(C).26029/11 2 the respondent himself in proceeding against the property for which it is liable to be proceeded against, for any other reason. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs