@CD SB. 18ervice Matter) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WET PETITION 1CHHATTISGARH)‘ (S) No.6??? /201o. ‘ {FD )K’ W; PETITIONER: Mithlesh Kumar'Thakur, son of Late Mothi lal Thakur, aged about 39 years, working as Upper Division Teacher Govt Mlddle School Mohad ¥« 3‘36 ...... Dongargarh RaJnandgaon, Dismct Chhattisgarh V6rSuS Resgondents 1.%tafe of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Education Depaltment, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, MM Chhattisgarh. 2 District Education Officer, RaJnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 3 Jomt Director, Accounts Treasury and Pens10n, Rajnandgaon, Dlstrict Rajnandgaon, C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE M CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI»H—78 C Kama, m, WEI mm w:.e:..c2>.> Na:.§..y;j=1(;oo mmqaigw)‘ mam wmm WWW agwm issuo involvod in the yresent potition is no Iongsr res fritegra i The same has been fmaliy decided by the Hon’ble Supre Court in the case of Asha Saxena Vs. State of NLP. 35 0:5. 09 {IIIEMPJR £$C1 59. It is further submitted th “this Couxt has also taken a smmar View 1'11 iis order dated 6 ,2009 passed in W.P.{S) No. 6257/20G8. Counsel for the pet order dated 29.4.2010 passed wherein relying upon the jud gme t of the Supreme Court in the v case 0f Asha Saxena (supral and WW Swm SB : HaN’BLE MR. JUSTKEE PR1 PINKER DIWAKER 28wlgc2519 Shri KSPawax, counsel for the. yetitiangr. Smt. Smita Gh$, P.L. for th: Stata Comsd for the, petilijoner u'bmits that fhe petitionar is antitlad to benefit of two advanw increments on account of he having passed B.T.X. oxamination ofom his appointmont at his own, cost. It is submiitad that t ( er further submits that the Writ Aopeal NO. 124i2009, order passer} by this Court in another Writ Appeei No. 871’2009, directions have been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two auivance increments as per circular dateri i2]..9. 1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verificaton of the facts pleaded in the petition. Counsel for the. State submits thai case of rhe petitioners would also be considered on the same lines. 1 h m 0 a i" . ' n e ’ XI-HCw78 WW<W) mmm wmm mwm WW§wm *aifanm In View of abova, the pet ition is disposed of with a dimction to the respondcnt author ‘ties to ziecide ths daim of tha p€titioxler for grarlt of two advaii e increments as pm" circuiar dated 219.1974 issued by the S te of Madhya Pradesh after e petition Within a. period of voriflcau’on of the facts pleaded in eight weekS from today. It is made Clear that this ( opinion on merits of the case would be at liberty to decide the with law. E lourt has not expressmi emy Itd the authoritv concerneci same strictly in accordance Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge F