IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31972 of 2009 JAWAHAR YADAV, son of Umeshwar Yadav, resident of village – Lokmanpaur, P.S. Kharik, District – Bhagalpur Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.9000 of 2010 ARUN RAI, son of late Nage Rai, resident of village – Balu Tola Sihkund, P.S. Kharik, District – Bhagalpur. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05. 7.7.2010 Prayer of the petitioners had earlier been rejected vide order dated 21.5.2009. Submission of the counsel is that the reason why they have moved again is because of yet another accused having been granted bail vide order contained in annexure-3. There is a discussion that in absence of any specific allegation as to who fired, that accused was enlarged on bail. Case of the petitioner is similar if not identical. This Court has certain reservation in agreeing with the observation contained in annexure-3 in view of the facts which emerge in investigation. There is one dead person with three bullet injuries and two other women folk of the house also carry bullet injuries. Obviously, so many bullets cannot be fired from one gun. Therefore, the allegation that many people came armed with an intent to commit murder is borne out. Submission of the senior counsel that in absence of specific allegation as to who fired at whom, the accusation should be treated as bald and omnibus. This Court is not sitting in trial. Therefore, it is not required 2 to investigate the crime in such detail. The trial court will do its job. So far as allegation against the petitioners is concerned, it is serious enough and does not merit grant of bail. The prayer for bail is rejected. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)