1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.F. NO. 2395/2010 IN First Appeal No. 966/2010 (Khushal Bajirao Yeole & another VERSUS Ajay Haribhau Ramteke & another) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms Ganeshe h/f Shri K.R. Lambat, counsel for the appellants. Shri A.M. Quazi, counsel for the R-1. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 25 , 2010 . Heard. Perused the judgment passed by the trial Court. Since the first appeal is admitted, it is necessary to stay the effect and operation of the judgment passed by the trial Court during the pendency of the first appeal. Shri Quazi, the learned counsel for the respondent no.1, has deposited the balance consideration of Rupees Four Lacs in the Trial Court. In such circumstances, since the matter would remain pending before this Court for quite some time, the respondent no.1 is permitted to withdraw the amount of Rupees Four Lacs without prejudice. The withdrawal of the amount of Rupees Four Lacs would, however, not mean that the respondent no.1 is not ready and willing to perform his part of the contract as he has 2 immediately deposited the amount of Rupees Four Lacs after the decree was passed. The judgment passed by the trial Court is stayed during the pendency of the first appeal. The appellant is directed to maintain status quo as regards suit property during the pendency of the appeal. C.A. Is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. JUDGE APTE