IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN THURSDAY, THE 20TH JANUARY 2011 / 30TH POUSHA 1932 RP.No. 10 of 2000(A) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.2524/1992 DATED 16/11/1999 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER: --------------------------------------- SHARON FELLOSHIP CHURCH, THIRUVALLA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PASTOR C.V. JOHN. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KURIAN, SRI.A.V.THOMAS, SRI.MATHEW B. KURIAN. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, THIRUVALLA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 2. MUNICIPAL SECRETARY, THIRUVALLA. BY THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. ----------------------------------- C.M.Appln.2167 OF 2000 & R.P.No.10 of 2000 IN O.P.No.2524 OF 1992 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of January, 2011 O R D E R Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. The judgment sought to be reviewed was issued more than 9 years ago. The review petition was filed in the year 2000. With this application for condonation of delay, it was never brought up even for issuance of notice. Yet we look into the judgment. It contains different findings which ultimately led the Bench to hold that the writ petitioner does not have the locus standie to challenge Ext.P7 order so long as the owner of the building Smt.Aleyamma Thomas has not challenged it. The charge of property tax is evidently on the building and the levy is on the owner. Such finding in the impugned judgment is sought to be reviewed. We find no ground to entertain this RP.10/00 2 review petition by condoning the delay. The C.M.application and the review petition are dismissed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- P.S.GOPINATHAN, Judge. kkb.20/1.