^?;y.~ ^. •f*'^ ^ '^"•^t ^ " c^- u-T7-ZS> -';-isw;!i IN TI-IE HI6H COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHAmSSARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S)NO. 3^8 /; Petitioners Krishnalal Kaushik S/o Late Lakhan Prasad, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Sirls Higher Secondary Janjgir, Block - Navagarh, Janjgir Champa-(C.6.) Smt. Naumi Aruna Singh W/o Shri Vijay Amar Singh, Aged about 58 year-S, Upper bivision Teacher, Govt. Girls Higher Secondary Janjgir, Block - Navagarh, Janjgir Champa-(C.6.) Chedilal Sopal S/o Shri Budhram Yadav Aged about 60 years, Upper Division Teacher< 6ovt.(Bahu) Higher Secondary Janjgir, Btock - Navagarh, Janjgir Champa-(C.6.) Ram Sarkar Rathor'e S/o Late Bahoranlal, Aged about 54 years Upper Division Teacher, 6ovt. (Bahu) 1-ligher School, Janjgir, Block - Dist: Janjgir Champa-(C.S.) V&rsus Respondents :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Education Department, Mantrolaya, &.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur-(C.6.) ^' ^. (2) The Director, Public Instruction Chhattisgarh Government Raipur. The District Education Officer, Dist: Janjgir Champa-(C.6.) The Block Education Officer, Block - Navagarh, Dist: Janjgir Champa-(C.6.) WRIT PETTTEON UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF THE CONSTCTUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT, WRITS, bIRECTION ETC TO DO JUSTECE IN THE MATTER. L yn r s4 ^ MGH COURT OF OWATnSGASW AT KDLASPUR W. P. (s) No. 308 of 2007 Petitioners Krishtwlal Kaudiik cnd others Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & others Single Bcnch: Hon'ble Mr. Justica Satish K. AgmhaM. Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, Advoeste for tiie Petrtionars. Miss Sunita Jam, Panel lawyer for -the respondents/Slate. ORbER ^assed on 22nd Ctay of January, 2007) 1. Leumed counsel appearing far the ptititieners aibmits thot the petitioners were opfwmted o/s 14)per Divi,sion Teachers in Sovemment schools way-back. After completion of 12 yenrs of their ^rvices, -Ihey have been yanted First Kmmmwiati. The petitioners are entitled to Second Krammonfft'i crfter completion of 24 ye<ws. 2. The counsel has referred to Ihe Circufcr dated 24.4,2006 (Annexure P/3), whereunder it uppenrs that the te«:hersa entitled to Second Krommonnti w.e.f. 1.8.2003 in case they have completed 24 years of services before 1hat date ond the benesfit of the same would be made availdble w.e.f. Aterch. 2006 (payabfe m April, 2006) Bablu 3. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents/Sterte nstied on the said circuhr <md submits that a blnnket order connot be passed. The case has to be conadered indwidjialty m the li^it of the said circular. 4. In view of foregoing aibmissions ond circulars tfcrtad 19th April, 1999 (Annexure P/2) cnd 24.4.2006 (Arowxure P/3), this petition is allowed to the extent of maktn9 representations before the concemed authorities to consider their cases, in accordance with low, on its owi merit. Tlw representations, if so inade, may be considered within a period of Six weeks from the date of receipt of -the representations. No onter os to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge •c— "ESK~~^-~—^-^.-:^-