IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39060 of 2011 Tarjan @ Firoj Ansari & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02. 23.11.2011 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 382 of the I.P.C. The accusation is of relieving the train passenger of mobile and other articles. It appears from the impugned order that on informant retracting from the initial version the provisional bail was granted to these petitioners for appearing before the I.O. and placing the compromise and recording the statement of the informant but it appears that the I.O. submitted a report to that effect that petitioners are veteran criminals and they are pressurizing the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have no criminal antecedent and since the informant retracted from the initial version, hence in retaliation the I.O. has submitted a wrong report. Considering the stand of the informant and the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners namely 1. Tarjan @ Firoj Ansari 2. Teliya @ Sandeep @ Sanjeet Prasad, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Railway, Gaya in connection with Sasaram(Bhabhua) G.R.P.S. Case No. 11 of 2011. The bail bond of the petitioners will be provisionally accepted for a period of two months, during which the criminal antecedent of the petitioners will be verified and, if it is found that they are involved in a case of similar nature then it is deemed that no order in favour of the petitioners was passed and the bail bond of the petitioners will be cancelled by the learned Court below. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)