1 wp4553-11.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4553 OF 2011 Hashmat Ali Riyasat Ali Shaikh and ors. ..Petitioners Vs The Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rahabilitation Authority and ors. ..Respondents -- Mr.S.M.Bandkar, for petitioners. Mr.S.U.Kamdar, Senior Advocate with Mr.D.F.Sharma i/b., for respondent no.5. -- CORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 22 nd JUNE, 2011 P.C: Mentioned. Not on board. 2] By this petition, the petitioners challenge rejection of their application by the High Power Committee. Though the petitioners have not filed any Appeal before the High Power Committee, they have filed an application in Appeal filed by some other Society. The learned counsel for the petitioners is not in a position to explain how such application would be maintainable. In any case, the petitioners make grievance against the demolition of the huts which is going on for implementation of the slum 2 wp4553-11.odt rehabilitation scheme supported by the respondent no.5. 3] The learned counsel for the respondent no.5 has assured us that if the petitioners want they can be given alternate accommodation. If they do not want alternate accommodation, they can claim rent in lieu of alternate accommodation and, after completion of the scheme, they will be given permanent accommodation. 4] In any case, it appears that the petition is filed with an ulterior motive and the same cannot be entertained. Petition is rejected. [R.G.KETKAR, J.] [D.K.DESHMUKH, J.]