C-482 No. 87 of 2005 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. By way of this petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. the petitioners have prayed for quashing the charge sheet in case no. 88/2005, State vs. Ikram & others, u/s 147, 341 of IPC and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act and also quashing the impugned summoning order dated 28.1.2005 passed in the aforesaid case. Perusal of record shows that a First Information Report was lodged by respondent no. 3 against the applicants. The Investigating Officer after completing all the formalities submitted charge sheet against the applicants u/s 147, 341 of IPC and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act before 1st ACJ (J.D.) Roorkee Haridwar. The learned Magistrate took cognizance of the charge sheet submitted against the applicants and summoned them vide order dated 28.1.2005. Heard Sri Manish Arora, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for respondent no. 1 and perused the record. Having considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the impugned order, I am of the view that there is no flagrant miscarriage of justice and abuse of process of court in this case and the disputed questions of fact require scrutiny by the trial court. I do not find any illegality and impropriety in the impugned order dated 28.1.2005. I am not supposed to embark upon an enquiry with regard to accusation of the petitioners when the evidences are incomplete and hazy as yet. This court while exercising the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is not supposed to act as a trial judge. Accordingly, the petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed in limine. Stay order, if any, stands vacated. (B.C.K., J.) 02.01.2008 SP