Civil Revision No. 1289 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1289 of 2010 Date of Decision: February 25 , 2010 Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation Limited ...... Petitioner Versus Shree Ram Cotton Factory and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.G.C.Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This petition has been filed against the order closing evidence of the petitioner. Learned counsel states that even though three opportunities were concededly granted to the petitioner yet in the interest of justice it would not be inappropriate to grant one more opportunity to the petitioner to lead its entire evidence at its own responsibility. In my opinion though no fault can be technically found in the impugned order yet it would definitely advance the cause of justice if the petitioner is allowed one opportunity to lead its entire evidence. As per the impugned order the case is now fixed for 18.03.2010 for the evidence of the Civil Revision No. 1289 of 2010 2 respondents. Learned trial Court is directed to permit the petitioner to lead its entire evidence at its own responsibility on 18.03.2010. Learned counsel has undertaken that no further adjournment shall be sought for this purpose Consequently the revision petition is allowed in the above terms. A copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for the petitioner on payment of usual charges. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE February 25, 2010 sunita