- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. ARBITRATION PETITION NO.34 OF 2006 ... FRANCIS D’SOUZA ...Petitioner v/s. NIDHI INVESTMENT & ANR. ...Respondents ... Mr.S.S.Purohit with Mr.Prakash Shinde i/b M. Dhruva & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr.Zal Andhyarujina i/b Goenka Law Associates for Respondent No.1. Mr.V.T.Bhagat i/b Vasant & Co. for Respondent No.2. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 7TH MARCH,2006 - 2 - P.C.: Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. Perused the award made by the Arbitral tribunal and the appellate tribunal. The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner is not in a position to point out that the award made by the tribunal and appellate tribunal can be challenged on any of the grounds mentioned in Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act. Petition, therefore, cannot be entertained. It is disposed of. ...