/i" ^ ^-' ' BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (0 N0. "^Z 41 /2011 PETITIONER ,.-•: ^A-'^.'P- ^'^ >y,...-^ •••"\^ '••'' ^ff ..-••'/)si •<e*'\ ..-••'' RB^PONDENTS Shanti Devi, W/o. Shri Shadu Ram Agrawal, Aged about 55 years, R/o Lailunga7District, Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2.NagarPanchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) 3. Collector, Raigarh(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OFINDIA SV^V VI j<-(i«b miaroiwiRi Deepii ?s[ -4i<<i?i<i, BTily'Ko, faoiyy *(m<'iT(6*n% ..^..©..t^..::^.^200 sn^n rR (iiiii^) TOiiw^ifn sii^i SB: HQn'ble Shri Manindra Moh^ 02-12-2011 Shri Saurabh Dangi and Msj Shri V.V-S.Murthy, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the Statri ci*i<(i<n<ft't ^fPf^t ^f fe^ <f<i^K ^TSlfel 311^51 n Shrivastava. J. Bulbul Agrawal, counsel forthe petitioner. Advocate Generai atong with Shri Arun Sao, Learned counsel for the par^ies submit that an order has been passed in the identical cases arising from the ^ame area and on account of similar notices issued by Nagar Panchayat, Lailunba, Raigarh. Not disputed. Accordingly, this writ petiti|3n is aiso disposed off on the same terms. However, the Nagar Panchayat w<ll not take any acBon without affording proper opportunity of hearing to thepersctn concerned. The Nagar Panchayat may also decide the question of authorize^ dispute, before passing the ordej concerned. or unauthorized structure, as the same is in ', after considering the cases of the persons Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge iirS^l^OgCTBRT, -l''Sfl40—2/2011—i.SO.UOa. s^H 8 ^s B 4-