1 wp-7986-11.sxw dgm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7986 OF 2011 Rajiv L. Sagtani and ors. .... Petitioners vs The Pune Municipal Corporation, through Commissioner and ors. .... Respondents Mr. S. R. Ganbavale for the petitioners. Mr. V.S. Gokhale, AGP for respondents 3 to 7. CORAM: D. K. DESHMUKH & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : November 15, 2011 P.C.: The Petitioner by this Petition challenges Notification issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. 2 We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. We have perused various orders passed by the Supreme Court. In our opinion, as the Petitioner has already raised objections to Section 4 Notification and as the Land Acquisition Officer is under a statutory 2 wp-7986-11.sxw duty to consider those objections in accordance with law and in case ultimately the Land Acquisition Officer/State Government decides to acquire the land, the Petitioner can challenge that, it will not be appropriate to entertain this Petition at this stage. It is made clear that the Petitioner is at liberty to raise all contentions that may be available to him before the Land Acquisition Officer. If so raised, the Land Acquisition Officer shall consider them in accordance with law and the orders of the Supreme Court passed from time to time. 3 The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. There shall be no order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (D. K. DESHMUKH,J.)