CWP 9272/2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH SB Civil Writ Petition No. 9272/2010 Bhanwar Lal Narawat Vs. The State of Rajasthan and others. DATE OF ORDER : 21/07/2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Manish Sharma, for petitioner. Instant writ petition has been filed against the order of Service Appellate Tribunal dt. 02/07/2010 whereby the interim relief prayed for has been declined, however, notices have been issued on the appeal preferred by the petitioner. It appears from the record that the petitioner was transferred by Panchayat Samiti Nagaur from Kaladi to Gogelaav vide order dt. 21/04/2010 on account of which, one Smt. Sita Choudhary, being aggrieved, preferred appeal before the Tribunal and interim order has been passed in her favour. Since the post at Gogelaav could not became vacant on account of interim order passed by the Tribunal, as an interim arrangement, order was passed on 11/06/2010 by the Panchayat Samiti, Nagaur posting the petitioner at Gram Panchayat Bhomasar. Aggrieved by this partial modification as an interim arrangement made by the Panchayat Samiti, Nagaur, an appeal was preferred by the petitioner. However, while issuing notices of the appeal, the learned Tribunal was not inclined to CWP 9272/2010 [2] grant interim relief in favour of petitioner as prayed for assigning reasons therein. Counsel for petitioner submits that if the post at Gogelaav is not available on account of the stay being granted by the Tribunal in th case of Smt. Sita Choudhary, the petitioner should have been allowed to continue at Kaladi from where he was transferred. In the opinion of this Court, the submission at this stage is without substance for the reason that it is always for the administration to ascertain with regard to what interim arrangement is to be made and this Court is not supposed to suggest as to where the employee is to be posted while making interim arrangement by the authority in the interest of administration. Since appeal is still pending adjudication, any observation made may cause prejudice to either party, this Court does not find any error being committed by the Tribunal which may call for interference. Consequently, the writ petition has no merit and it is accordingly dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. Raghu-9272-CW-2010-final.doc