PETITIONER /}% Nagar Nigam Samastha Karmchari om hams-In Igi i, n'l Dhavpui .m..m JL‘u- u n Gugh ii. ‘1S Mahamantri Shri Kashi Prasad Karosiva Municipal Corporation? uGi‘iupaia Duaspul \v w) Versus Municipal Corporation Bilaspur. Ilii’GLign it’s wiayUI oi‘ri’i OI !I Ui’i‘la Shankar Jaiswal Municipal [A h \ wurpumuun Duabpul \u u) Municipal Corporation Bilaspur llll Uugl! ll. a bUIHllll§blUl lcl Municipal Corporation. Bilaspur !I" I" \ \u.u.} Shri S C Shrivastava aoed about 58 yEdlb 3U” Ul Ollll IVI l" OHHVd$ldVd, Ex—Actino Commissmner and plebemiy pumeu a3 EXECUii‘v'E Engineer Municipal Corporation; nun (r Shri K.K, Tiwari; counsel for the petitioner aim. opp .i namiua i i ..l oiuuiqdi, (\ AA buuuaci a iGi‘ the i’eSpunuunm No. 1 and. 2. None for respondent No 3, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTlcLE 2261227 OF THE PnAieTl‘l'l lTlhhl (1: IND!!! ORDER \U Ln’) “7 ’5’!“(1\ VA.“ .‘Tuuaj With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally. This petition has been tiled by Nagar Nigam Samastha Karmchari Sanght Bilaspur through it’s Mahamantri raising grievance of 44 employees of the Municipal Corporation whereby vide order dated 214.2003 (Annexure P-1) those empioyees; were transferred. This petition was filed on 7.5.2003 and on? rig 6.2.2006 this/Court had directed respondents No. 1 and 2 tol consider the representatibn of the petitioner. Thu... .nl.‘ an. [A [N \ DnaS§UF \u.u.) n..nnn I ‘ 4‘ a—nnnln “In HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI$GARH AT BILASPUR Single Eench : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker Writ Petition No. 1824 of 2003 RESPONDENTS 1 _ $1 Counsel for respondents No. 1 and 2 submits that the representation of the petitioner was decided by respondents No. 1 and 2 on 28.11.2008. She further submits that since the aggrieved persens have not approached this Court. this petition is Accepting the contention of counsei for the respondents No. 1 and 2 and considering the fact that the petition was flied by a group of empioyees of Municipal Corporation and not by the aggrieved persons themselves; this court is of the opinion that not maintainable. this petition has no' substance and therefore the same is dismissed. Sdl— Pr'mnke x. Diwaker . Judge W at