@ H§GH CGURT 8F CHHAKTisgARH: E§LA$FER wm Petition ggLNo. 527 o€ 2mg Petitioners hiss. Sheeia Tiwari, Dio‘ Late 8P, Tiwari, Aged about 5.7 years, Vice Principai, Mazharani LaxmE Bah Girze Higher Secondary Schcoi, Béiaspun Tahsn & District Bibspur (CG). Versus Resgonden'ts 1) state of Chhattisgar'n; through Secretary, Deoan‘ment of Education: Mantra§aya, DKS. Bhawai'x, Raépur (CG). 2) Disirict Education Geicer, Biiaepur, District Biiaepur (CC—i). of; Principal Maharani iaxmi Bai Higher Secondary School, Bilaspurs Tahsi! & District Biiaspur (CG) (Writ Peti‘rion under Articie 226 of the Constitu‘tion of india) SB: Hon’bie Mr. Saiish K. Agnihoifi, J. Heseni: Shri Ks Par/var: counsel for the petitioner. Shri SK. Mishra, Panei Lawyerr‘oi’the Stare. 0. L §R§ER (?assed on 25* Janeen}. 2098} Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as weii as for the Siate/reepono‘ente jointiy submit that the fact and question of iaw invoived in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Vashwant Kumat Bharaowaj Vs. Municipai Corporation, 3mg and another €2686 {it} MPJR - CG as}, which has’peen disposed of vide order dated 3-4-2038. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. 2?, Accordingly] the writ petition is aiiowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipai Corporation, Borg and another (supra), subject to verification of the tact as to whether the petitioner has acquired BEd. Examination Certificate on her own expenses as per the circulars dated 24424 998 and further whether she has ‘oeen paid two / / advance increments or not. No order as to costs, / sal- . i l Smash K- Ag‘“ 'hOtY" Judge r l \