WPSS No.1891 of 2011 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Shri Bhagwat Mehra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Anil Bisht, learned Brief Holder for the State/ respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The issue involved in this case is as to whether the petitioner was liable to be considered for “Shiksha Mitra”. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is the “Shiksha Acharya” and he fulfills all the requirements, which are necessary for appointment as “Shiksha Mitra”. As per Government Order dated 19.11.2010, every “Shiksha Acharya”/ “Anudeshak”, all over the State of Uttarakhand, who fulfill certain requirements are to be considered for “Shiksha Mitra”. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the procedure for making “Shiksha Acharya” to “Shiksha Mitra” is on at district Udham Singh Nagar and though the petitioner is eligible for being considered as “Shiksha Mitra”, but his name has not been forwarded by the concerned Block Education Officer. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Project Officer, Surva Shiksha Abhiyan, Udham Singh Nagar (respondent no.3), to consider the name of the petitioner in accordance with law. In case he fulfills all the eligibility criteria for appointment as “Shiksha Mitra”, his name shall be considered, as delay in forwarding his name has not been caused due to his fault. Misc. application (CLMA No.13418 of 2011) also stands disposed of. ( V.K. Bist , J.) Arpan 21.12.2011