IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1889 of 2009 1. Sanjiv Kumar Jha @ Sanjay Kumar Jha 2. Deepak Kumar Jha, both sons of late Sahdeo Jha, R/o villageMasumganj, P.S. Saarganj, P.S. Asarganj(Tarapur) District Munger …….Petitioners. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Ram Kishore Prasad son of late Yogendra Prasad R/o village Masumganj, P.S. Asarganj (Tarapur) District Munger ………..opposite parties. ----------------- 3 13.12.2011 The accused petitioners have preferred this revision application against the judgment and order dated Ist July 2008 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, F.T.C. V, Munger in Cri. Appeal No. 64 of 2002 by which the conviction of the petitioners under section 323 of the Indian Penal Code has been upheld and they have been released on admonition of Probation of Offenders Act. Heard Ms. Sushunita Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mrs. Indu Bala pandey for the State. It appears that the petitioners were convicted by judgment and order dated 11.4.2002 passed in complaint case no.314 C/96 by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist class, Munger by which they were convicted and sentenced to S.I. for six months each under sections 323 and 379 and the sentences were directed to run concurrently. Thereafter the petitioners preferred Cri. Appeal No. 64 of 2002 by which they were not found guilty under section 379 of the Indian penal Code and sentences of the petitioners were modified and the conviction under section 323 I.P.C. was upheld. The sentence was modified and they were directed to be released on admonition. It appears 2 that there is concurrent finding of conviction under section 323 I.P.C. After considering the facts and circumstances stated above, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. M.Rahman (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)