1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE P. I. L. NO.55 OF 2003 Narayan Ramchandra Khule & Ors. ...Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. S.B. Deshmukh i/b. Mr. A.V. Anturkar for the Petitioners. Mr. P. M. Patil, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. ..... CORAM : R. M. LODHA AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. July 12, 2006. P.C. The Collector, Pune has filed an affidavit on 28th June 2006. In paragraphs (C) and (D) of the affidavit, the following statement has been made : “(C) I also say that the expression “Temporary price” in relation to the present case is the temporary sale price worked out as per the sale-purchase statistics taken place at village Phulgaon Tal. Havel for last 5 years. (D) I also further say that the Collector have now fixed final price of the land as Rs. 20,89,450/- as per guideline given by Govt. of Maharashtra Resolution No. Revenue and forest Res. No. Jamin 10/2002/P.K.387/J-1, dt. 29/05/2006. Out of said amount, the institute has already paid an amount of Rs. 12,04,980/-. The differential amount of Rs. 8,84,470/- along with an interest of Rs. 4,30,073/- as such total amount of Rs. 13,14,543/- is due from the institute. It has been asked to pay the said amount vide this office letter bearing No.PMH-996-06, dt. 27/06/2006. Hereto annexed as 2 Exhibit “A”.” We are satisfied with the aforesaid statement and in view thereof, nothing survives to be decided in the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. ( R. M. Lodha, J.) ( Dr.D. Y. Chandrachud, J.)