In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CRM No. M-2524 of 2008 Decided on:- 21.04.2009 Sanjay Gupta and another ……Petitioners Versus Manoj Kumar …….Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. C. Puri Present Mr. R. S. Sihota, Sr. Advocate with Mr. B. R. Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mahavir Sandhu, Advocate for the respondent-complainant. K. C. Puri, J.(Oral ) Learned counsel for the respondent-complainant has stated that complainant wants to proceed against respondent no.3 i.e Brastachar Mitao-Lok Tantra Bachao Samiti, Jagdhari, before the trial Court. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners has stated at bar that accused no.1 and 2 i.e present petitioners would supply the address to the trial Court and the trial Court be ordered to summon that respondent and proceed in accordance with law and does not press this petition with liberty to raise all the points before the trial Court. The trial Court shall proceed in view of the statements of the parties. The petition stands disposed off with liberty to raise all the points before the trial Court against all the respondents. April 21, 2009 ( K.C. Puri ) Mamta Judge