IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4770 of 2010 ARUN KUMAR, SON OF RAJENDRA RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – RAMJICHAK, POLICE STATION – DIGHA, DISTRICT – PATNA. ………………………… PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. ………………….. OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- FOR THE PETITIONR :- MANISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE. FOR THE STATE :- RAJESH KUMAR, APP. … 2 26.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the allegation set up in the first information report, three named accused persons tried to commit theft of the motorcycle of the informant, however, they were apprehended by the police. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the first information report and he was not apprehended on the spot. Petitioner’s name has surfaced upon the confessional statement of a co-accused, namely, Laxman Kumar, on the spot. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the antecedent of the petitioner is clean and is in custody since 19.11.2009. Considering the facts and circumstances of the 2 case, I direct the abovenamed petitioner, Arun Kumar, to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in S.K. Puri Police Station Case No. 225 of 2009 with further condition that one of the bailors must be close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall state on affidavit before the court concerned, giving complete genealogy, as to how he or she is related with the petitioner. Further, after his release if the petitioner is again found involved in similar kind of criminal cases, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)