IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1949 OF 2008 Smt.Simmy Vinay Poddar .. Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.M.S.Mohite i/by Mr.Chandrakant Talekar for the Applicant. Mr.D.P.Adsule, A.P.P for Respondent No.1. Mr.R.S.Jaisinghani for Respondent No.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. : A.S.OKA, J. : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 18th July 2008. P.C.: . Heard advocate for the applicant. The application made by the applicant for grant of anticipatory bail is pending before the Sessions Court. The contention of the applicant in this application is that the advocate for the complainant has no locus to appear in the application for grant of anticipatory bail. 2. As of today, there is nothing on record to show that any order has been passed by the learned Sessions Judge permitting intervention by the complainant. If the complainant makes an attempt to participate in the proceedings at the time of hearing of the application : 2 : for grant of anticipatory bail, the applicant can always raise an objection to the participation of the complainant before the learned Sessions Judge. The learned Sessions Judge is bound to take into consideration the said objection and deal with the same in accordance with law. 3. Subject to what is stated above, no interference is required. Application is disposed of. (A.S.Oka,J)