1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30.03.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN Writ Petition(MD)No.3721 of 2011 A.Kennedy :Petitioner -Vs- The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., represented by its Junior Engineer (Operation and Maintenance), Kallakudi, Tiruchirapalli District. :Respondent Prayer:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to effect change of electricity service connection bearing Nos.A35, A36 and A467 for the building bearing survey No.273/13C3C, Main Road, Dalmiapuram, Tiruchirapalli District. For Petitioner:Mr.G.R.Swaminathan For Respondent:Mr.M.Sureshkumar ORDER Mr.M.Sureshkumar, learned counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage. 2.The petitioner who has purchased the property by virtue of sale deed executed by the trial Court. Originally, he entered into an agreement. Since the party did not execute the sale deed, he filed a suit in O.S.No.448 of 2010 and the same was decreed in favour of the petitioner and as per the decree, E.P. was filed by the petitioner. Since the party did not come forward for execution, sale deed was executed by the Court itself. Pursuant to the sale deed which is in his favour, he applied for transfer of electricity service connection in his name. But the authorities have only stated that since the sale deed has not been executed by the concerned individual, they are not willing to transfer the electricity service connection in the name of the petitioner, even though the sale deed stands in the name of the petitioner. Hence, he made representations, dated 09.02.2011, 09.03.2011 and 15.03.2011 to the authorities concerned. Since no orders have been passed in the representations, he has come forward with the present writ petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3.Learned counsel for the respondent would contend that the authorities will abide by law, if any application is pending and the same is otherwise in order, they would consider and pass orders on it. 4.Taking into consideration the limited scope of the prayer made in the writ petition to dispose of representation of the petitioner, dated 15.03.2011, there will be a direction to the authorities concerned to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 15.03.2011 and especially in view of the fact that the sale deed itself executed by the Court, there cannot be any impediment for the Department to transfer the service connection in the name of the petitioner, if the application is otherwise in order and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5.With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (LA) / TRUE COPY / Assistant Registrar To: The Junior Engineer (Operation and Maintenance), The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Kallakudi, Tiruchirapalli District. Sms RP/26.04.2011/2P/2C. Writ Petition (MD)No.3721 of 2011 30.03.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/