m. @ HIGH COURT OF CEIHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ‘v‘v’rit Petition( “y Nu. 2363 ui'261‘i8 Niranjan Thalmr, aged about 25 yams, S10 Anjcri Thakur, R/o Dudiya Armada, Gunderdshi Wsi‘t. Burg. VERSHS 1. The State cf Chhaifi md Rural D€pat1men DKAS Bhawan, Raipur. The Col‘ector‘ Kzinker, Chief Fwcrjiive Gfficer, impad E‘mclmyat Koilibeda, )’4. Disit. Uiiar Rwm Kaliker, 4. Distric-t 13a11$hayat through Chiaf Executive Oglcer, Dim. Uttar Bastar Kankr. {WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITI ITION OF INDIA) (SB: Hou'hle Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri7 J.) Pres‘mt : Shri Parag Kateeha, Advocate for the peti‘iioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dapuiy Adveuaie Gensrai for tht: State/respondents. amvnNgEwTe gaih, Thmugh Secretary, Pagchayat -, {IRA}, HERE]? i u ‘y (r nassea I on A5 a I ‘ m 1' Ami}. A aufm; Hn \(‘h With the comeni 0f the pariieg, the mmw is fakgn mg) for hearing finany. H4 Th? petitimier Wm appointed ad Shikgha Kanni Grad€ II 011 08.08.2007 )ix. {Almewre 13/1) in Middle Scliool, NEW; Rinck Gumlerdehi Digtrict Durg. All of a sudden; wiihrmt affixdiiig any oppomu‘giiy of hearing, the appointment of the petitioner was cancelled on 27.11.2007 (Amexure P/2) on the alleged ground, that there was irregularity in the appointment. Leamed cotu-sel appearing for the yetitianer submits that the questimt of law 4'4 M to whether an employee is entitled t- L110“; cause netiee even to examine the genuineness oftlte doeument haS already beeL e ,nsidered by this Court iii a batch of matter by judgncht an order datcti Mm Eviarch, 2008 in W.P.(S) No. 9§i2008 (Kt! Punem Rt Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh (BL I (Hikers) and other eoimeeted matters This mee is squarely eovered on the question of law. _.__., Shti Y3. Eiakur, lwmed Deputy édvwate Ganeral gubmitg that s0 fgr m J; Sahu to verify the facts QfThe case. En View of the. fbregomg, tlLiS petition is allawed in the same temis i.e. pii€iomr be. a__.‘rded an opportuni. of hearing to Establish ganuineness, trmhiiliness (“H.113 dramm-ants Submitted by her for obtainmg appointment 0n thj post. Th6 impugned Grater shall not be givetl eifecft to until the direction mentioned hereinabove, is ecliipiied With. i sw- t Satish K. Agnimri i ‘ Judge no”,