s. HiGH COURTOF CHHATTiSGARH: Btt.^PUR Petitioners Respondente Writ Petition (S) No. 2039 of2008 1) Mahesh Kumar Maiviya, son of Shri Kalu Ramji Malviya, aged about 58 yeare, presently working as Ayurved Medical Officer (Ayurved Chikitsa officer) Go!d Giri - BSock Berla, Distt. Durg (CG). 2) Dr. Harish Kumar Vijayavargiya, age 51 years, s/o. Late Shri Gauri Shanter Vijayavargiya, presently working as Ayurved Chik'tsa Adhikari, D'spensary - Tenduwa fTatibandh) Distt. Raipur (CG). Versys 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through fte Chief Secretery, Dau Katyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2) State of Madhya Pradesh, through the Chief Secretary, Govemmsnt of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopai. 3) Director of Indian system of medicine and Homeopathy, Dau Kaiyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 4) Director of indian System af Medteine and Homeopathy Sa^sura Bhawan, Bhopa! QyiP). 5) Union of India through Ministry of Personnei, Public Griewnces and Pension Departmert of Personnel and Training Khan Market, New (Writ Petition Article under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Smt. Pushpa Dwivedi, counset for the petitioners. Shri SaUsh Gupta, Govt. Advocate fortheState. Shri Ajay Baraik, counsel for Union of tndia. ORAL ORMR (Passedon 7-4- With consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitionere submits that she does not want to press this petition on merit, except that the petitioners be permitted to make a representetion to the Committee inthe light of the judgment and order dated 17th April, 2007 passed bythis Court in B.R. Godbote Vs. Munictpa! Corporation Durg, and others ( 2007 (2) CGLJ 417), to which toamed counsel appearing forthe respondents/State has no o^jection. 3) Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e., the Committee so constituted is directed to consider Uie representations made by the petitioners, if their representations are not considered earlier. In the event, if their representations are not considered eariier, the fresh representetions may be considered, as expeditiousiy as possible within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the representations. The representations may be considered keeping in mind the fact of residence and posting of the employee in one State and posting of the spouse in other State. This exercise on the part of the Govemment of India may be compteted within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. E^ajy Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^