IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 15108 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: 18.11.2011 Sham Kumar Sethi ..........Petitioner Versus Punjab State Agricultural Marketing Board, ..........Respondents Punjab and others BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- None for the petitioner. Mrs. Jaspal Gurna, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 4. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. Counsel for the petitioner was neither present on 28.3.2011 nor on 31.10.2011. Today again, he is not present. Earlier an objection has been raised by counsel for the respondents that the present writ petition is not maintainable as only remedy available to the petitioner is to file revision under Section 42 of the Punjab Agriculture Produce Markets Act, 1961. Since the impugned order dated 7.7.2010 has been passed by the Board and only remedy available to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order is by way of revision, the present petition is not maintainable and the same is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file revision against the impugned order. November 18, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE