IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.7312 of 2002 Between: V. Ajay Kumar, S/o V. Shekar Reddy, D.No.2-2-12/1K(B6), Durgabhai Deshmukh Colony, Shivam Road, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Chief Town Planner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Hyderabad. 3 The Legend Builders, rep. by Y.Santosh Reddy, S/o. Vittal Reddi, D.No.3*4*789/1, Barkatpura, Hyderabad - 27. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents 1 and 2 in not initiating action against the third respondent in pursuance of the complaint of the petitioner dated 15.03.2002 which is in consonance of the ratio of the judgment in W.P.No.25011 of 1998 dated 25.01.2002 as being illegal, arbitrary and acting as an aid in perpetuating the illegal constructions contrary to the provisions of the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad Act and the rules made thereunder. Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. M. Mehdi Hussain Counsel for the respondents: R. Radhakrishna Reddy (S.C. for GHMC, SNCZONE) The Court made the following Order: When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. _______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDpY, J. April 7, 2009 MRR