IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3368 of 2005 1.Kishori Prasad Yadav son of Sri Deep Narayan Prasad, resident of village Gopalpur, P.S. Marhaura, District Saran 2.Rajendra Rai son of late Salik Rai, resident of village Pokhtera, P.S.Taraiya, Dist.Saran 3.Lal Mohar Mahto son of late Tileshwar Mahto resident of village Saidpur, P.O.Afaur, Dist. Saran 4.Lochan Bhagat son of late Raman Bhagat, resident of village Bagahi, P.S.Taraiya Dist. Saran 5.Shri Bhagwan Rai son of late Ambika Rai, resident of village Maya Rai Ke Tola, P.S.Khaira Dist. Saran 6.Kuseshwar Singh son of Shri Bhairav Singh, resident of village Gandar Chhapia, P.S.Taraiya District Saran 7.Uma Singh son of late Sarvanand Singh, resident of village Rasauli, P.S.Panapur,Dist.Saran 8.Arun Kumar Singh son of late Lakshmi Narayan Singh, resident of village Chainpur, P.S. Taraiya, Dist. Saran 9.Raman Singh son of Yamuna Singh, resident of village Mashrak, Gopalbari, P.S.Mashrak, Dist. Saran 10.Amarnath Tiwary son of late Parashuram Tiwary resident of village Tek Niwas, P.S.Rivilganj Dist. Saran 11.Manager Rai son of Lomar Rai, resident of Sahadi, P.S.Amnaur, Dist. Saran----petitioners Versus 1.The State of Bihar 2.Mr.Raj Kumar Singh I.A.S., Presently posted as Secretary, Department of Forests and Environment Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.Mr.B.L.Khan, presently posted as Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4.Mr.Umashankar Jha, presently posted as Conservator of Forests, Muzaffarpur 2 5.Mr.Bijay Narayan Prasad, presently posted as Divisional Forest Officer, Extension Division, Saran, Chapra-------------------------opp.parties ----------- 6. 12.8.2009 A supplementary show cause has been filed today on behalf of opposite party no.5, the Divisional Forest Officer, Extension Division, Saran, Chapra in which order no.48 dated 31.7.2009 (Annexure-A) has been annexed by which the claim of the petitioner for regularization has been considered and giving reasons for the same rejected. In the above circumstances, the order under contempt has been complied with. The contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed. The petitioners if aggrieved by the said order would be at liberty to assail the same in appropriate proceedings. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) spal/