THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:2845 OF 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 28.12.2011, in I.A.No.945 of 2010 in O.S.No.437 of 2006 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nizamabad, wherein the said application filed under Order I Rule 10 CPC by the respondents 1 and 2 i.e. plaintiffs seeking impleadment of the petitioner herein, as a party defendant, was allowed. 2. Heard both sides. Perused the records. 3. Respondents 1 and 2 herein filed the suit against the respondents 3 to 9 herein for a permanent injunction restraining them from raising any sort of construction in the schedule property. Plaintiffs are stated to be the neighbours and owners of the property adjacent to the plaint schedule house site. It is stated that the land owners gave the suit site to the 1st defendant for development purpose and subsequently they entered into the development agreement with the petitioner herein. The proposed 8th defendant is going ahead with the construction. Plaintiffs apprehended that the petitioner is proceeding with the construction without a sanctioned plan and in violation of the building rules. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner-8th defendant has applied for necessary permission from the municipal corporation and by order, dated 12.08.2010, the municipal corporation accorded necessary permission for construction and also approved the sanction plan submitted by the petitioner. A copy of the said proceedings, dated 12.08.2010, issued by the municipal corporation, and a copy of the sanction plan are also filed along with an undertaking affidavit by the petitioner, whereunder the petitioner has undertaken to proceed with the construction strictly in accordance with the permission, dated 12.08.2010, and as per the sanction plan, as approved by the municipal corporation. The above undertaking affidavit filed by the petitioner before this Court is duly recorded and the petitioner is permitted to go ahead with the construction, but however strictly in accordance with the permission granted by the municipal corporation and the plan sanctioned by the municipal corporation. In the event of any deviation from the permission and sanction plan, plaintiffs are at liberty to avail all remedies available under law against the petitioner and the land owners. 5. In the circumstances, the impugned order, impleading the petitioner as proposed 8th defendant, is held not liable to be interfered with. 6. In the result, Civil Revision Petition is accordingly disposed of. ______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY,J 02nd November, 2011. Tsy