IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2011 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 30586 of 2011(W) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ RAZACK, TAHAZATHU VEETTIL HOUSE, MALAYAMMA P.O., VENNAKKODE ROAD, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SMT.R.PADMAKUMARI RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE-673 020. 2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE-673 020. 3. E.C.ABU, ELAVANCHALIL HOUSE, P.O.KODUVALLY, KOZHIKODE-673 020. R1 & R2BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. G.GOPAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/12/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.30586/2011 W APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1- TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT. EXHIBIT P2- TRUE COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE. EXHIBIT P3- TRUE COPY OF THE TIMING ISSUED BY THE RTA KOZHIKODE. EXHIBIT P4- TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT. EXHIBIT P5- TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT. EXHIBIT P6- TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT. EXHIBIT P7- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER THE R.T.I.ACT. EXHIBIT P8- TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ---------------------------------------------- WP (C) No. 30586 of 2011 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner, a stage carriage operator operating a stage carriage on the route Kunnamangalam - Punnakkal - Thamarassery has filed this writ petition contending that though the third respondent, another stage carriage operator, is not adhering to the time schedule allotted to his stage carriage, the respondents are not taking any action against him notwithstanding the fact that Exts.P4 to P6 complaints pointing out the said fact have been filed before them. When the writ petition came up for hearing today, Sri.G.Gopakumar, learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the Regional Transport Officer, Kozhikkode has taken action pursuant to the complaints and has issued three check reports to the third respondent. Such being the situation, as Ext.P4 to P6 complaints have been considered and appropriate action taken thereon, I find no reason to entertain this writ petition. It is accordingly closed recording WP(C)No. 30586 of 2011 -2- the submission made by the learned Government Pleader that action has been taken on Exts.P4 to P6 complaints. Sd/- P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. Rkc // true copy// PA to Judge