IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31314 of 2011(L) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- JIJI.C.P,AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.LATE PAREETHU RAWTHER,KIZHAKKAYIL, KOTTANGAL VILLAGE,MALLAPPALLY TALUK,KOTTANGAL.P.O, PIN-686 547. BY ADVS. SRI.BABU CHERUKARA, SRI.ANZAR BASHEER. RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,PATHANAMTHITTA,PIN-689 645. 2. TAHSILDAR,MALLAPPALLY TALUK, MALLAPPALLY WEST,PATHANAMTHITTA,PIN-689 585. 3. TALUK SURVEYOR,MALLAPPALLY-689 585. 4. M.M.KHAN RAWTHER,AGED 73 YEARS, S/O.LATE MOIDEEN RAWTHER,MARUTHENKUNNEL HOUSE, KOTTANGAL.P.O,KOTTANGAL,PIN-686 547. 5. ABDUL JALEEL,AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.M.M.KHAN RAWTHER,MARUTHENKUNNEL HOUSE, KOTTANGAL.P.O,KOTTANGAL,PIN-686 547. 6. V.K.ABUL SALAM,AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.M.M.KHAN RAWTHER,MARUTHENKUNNEL HOUSE, KOTTANGAL.P.O,KOTTANGAL,PIN-686547. 7. ABDUL SALIM,AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.M.M.KHAN RAWTHER,MARUTHENKUNNEL HOUSE, KOTTANGAL.P.O,KOTTANGAL,PIN-686 547. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.31314/2011 L APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT-P1: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE PLAINT.(O.S.NO.311/2011 OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT,THIRUVALLA). EXT-P2: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE TEMPORARY INJUNCTION ORDER DATED 5-7-2011 OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT`,THIRUVALLA. EXT-P3: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE W.P.(C).25058/2011. EXT-P4: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)25038/2011-D OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA, DATED 22-9-2011. EXT-P5: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BEFORE THE TAHSILDAR BY THE PETITIONER DATED 28-10-2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 31314 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T The only prayer sought in this writ petition is, before taking further action based on Ext.P4 judgment of this court, petitioner's objection filed as Ext.P5 should also be considered. I do not see any reason why the said prayer of the petitioner should not be granted. Therefore I direct that when the 2nd respondent takes further action based on Ext.P4 judgment of this court, the objection filed by the petitioner should also be duly adverted to. The writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-