IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1582 of 2010 RAGHO SINGH S/O SATYENDRA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR For the petitioner : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar (Munna), Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ----------- 02 03.11.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner has been declared juvenile. He is accused of a case punishable under Sections 302/ 201 of the Penal Code. The abducted person was killed and cut into pieces and thrown into river. As per allegation in the F.I.R., the deceased had accompanied the petitioner and others to attend the function/feast thereafter he did not return. In course of investigation confessional statement of the petitioner and others was/were recovered. Pursuant thereto parts of the dead body were recovered. It is the contention of the petitioner that he is in remand home since 19.01.2010. Referring to paragraph no. 12, it is submitted that in the year 2008, one case under minor Sections of Penal Code was registered against the petitioner which is currently pending. This Court finds from the impugned order that in his confessional statement the petitioner has admitted about commission of other crimes. Considering the manner in which the occurrence was committed prima facie it indicates that petitioner has criminal aptitude. It has further been contended that the mother has taken upon herself the responsibility relating to the petitioner in case he is released on 2 bail. Having regard to the materials on record, this Court, for the present, is inclined to agree with the conclusion arrived at paragraph no.7 of the appellate Court order and is, therefore, not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Application is dismissed. This Court, however, grants liberty to the petitioner to renew prayer for bail in the Court below itself if all the prosecution witnesses are not examined within 07 months from the date of receipt/communication of a copy of this order in the Court below. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)