Delay Condonation App. No. 10996 of 2011 Review Application No. 776 of 2011 In SPA No. 30 of 2011 Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J. Mr. K.P. Upadhyaya, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand / appellants. Mr. C.D. Bahuguna, Advocate for the respondents / review applicants. Being satisfied with the reasons furnished for the delay in preferring the Review Application, we allow the Delay Condonation Application and condone the delay in filing the Review Application. From paragraph No. 9 of the judgment under review, it will be crystal clear that the judgment and order under appeal, decided by the judgment and order under review, accepted that there was a ban on making appointments. At the time when the judgment and order under review was rendered, no attempt was made to bring on record anything to suggest that the judgment and order under appeal, considered in the judgment and order under review, incorrectly accepted that there was a ban on making appointments. In the present Review Application, it is being contended that there was no such ban. A review, on that premise, is not permissible. The Review Application is dismissed. (U.C. Dhyani, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 12.12.2011 G