HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.1110 of 2008 Date of Order: 15.07.2011 Between: Adepu Markandeya ..Petitioner and The District Panchayat Officer, Warrangal and others ..Respondents The Court made the following Order: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.1110 of 2008 ORDER :- This writ petition is filed assailing the action of the District Panchayat Officer, Warangal, in not considering the petitioner’s representation dated 04.01.2008 for cancellation of the construction permissions, granted by Gorrekunta Gram Panchayat, Gorrekunta, Warangal District, pending consideration of the application for sanction of lay out in respect of the land in Survey Nos.153, 159 and 160 of Gorrekunta Village. This Court, on the very first date of hearing of the writ petition on 25.01.2008, observed that the relief sought in the writ petition could not be granted without impleading E.Papa Reddy, the applicant for sanction of the lay out in the subject land. Thereupon, the petitioner filed W.P.M.P.No.2644 of 2008 in the writ petition to implead the said person. The W.P.M.P. was ordered on 15.02.2008, whereby E.Papa Reddy was arrayed as respondent No.4 in the writ petition. Perusal of the petitioner’s representation dated 04.01.2008 reflects that he named as many as nine persons therein and requested cancellation of the building permissions secured by them. However, none of those persons are impleaded in this writ petition. It is his case that the Gorrekunta Gram Panchayat granted construction permission to these nine persons even before the sanction of the lay out and, therefore, the District Panchayat Officer, Warangal should take action for cancellation of such permissions. In the given facts and circumstances, this Court would necessarily have to go into the merits of the petitioner’s challenge for adjudicating the matter. Such adjudication would, in consequence, be behind the back of persons whose interests would be vitally affected thereby. The conduct of the petitioner, be it in failing to implead respondent No.4 in the first instance or not impleading the nine persons whose building permissions are subjected to challenge, clearly demonstrates an abuse of the process of this Court. The petitioner seems to be settling his personal scores with these persons and is attempting to do so by using the process of this court behind their back, without impleading them. The Writ Petition must therefore fail on this ground and is accordingly dismissed. The M.Ps filed in the writ petition shall stand dismissed as infructuous in the light of this final order. No order as to costs. ___________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J July 15, 2011 lmv HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.1110 of 2008 15.07.2011 lmv