THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4886 OF 2002 DATED: 27-01-2011 Between: Cherukuri Sanjeeva Rao. .... PETITIONER And Nimmagadda Nageswara Rao. .... RESPONDENT ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 11-10-2002, in E.P.No.43 of 2002 in O.S.No.109 of 1994 on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, wherein the sale is adjourned on petition filed by the judgment-debtor. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. None appeared for the respondent. Perused the record. 3. There cannot be any grievance for the judgment- debtor that can be adjudicated by way of revision over the impugned order inasmuch as by the said order, the Execution Court merely adjourned the sale on a petition filed by the judgment-debtor and granted time for payment of the E.P. amount. This Court, by order, dated 24-10- 2002, in C.M.P.No.20282 of 2002 granted interim stay, subject to the condition of the judgment-debtor paying 1/3rd of the decretal amount and balance amount in two monthly instalments. Subsequently, by order, dated 29- 04-2003, in C.M.P.No.27174 of 2002, this Court extended time for payment by two weeks with a further direction that if the amount is not deposited as directed, the earlier order in C.M.P.No.20282 of 2002 stands withdrawn. Now, after a lapse of more than eight years, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time for ascertaining whether the interim order is complied with or not. The said request for adjournment is totally untenable. By filing the Civil Revision Petition and obtaining interim order of stay, the judgment-debtor has gained more than eight years’ time for payment of the decretal amount. There are absolutely no valid or justifiable grounds to grant any further extension of time for payment of the decretal amount as more than sufficient time is already gained by the judgment-debtor by filing the Civil Revision Petition. There are absolutely no merits in this Civil Revision Petition. 4. In the result, Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 25th January, 2011. Tsy