IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45345 of 2009 Raja Yadav, S/O Somnath Yadav, R/O Vill.- Azad Tola, P.S.+ Distt.- Madhepura. ……..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Mukesh Kumar. S/O Hare Ram Yadav, R/O Vill.- Azad Tola, P.S.+ Distt.- Madhepura. ………Opposite Parties ---------------------------------- 2. 19.12.2011 The informant-petitioner has preferred this application under Section 439 (2) of the Cr.P.C. against the order dated 30.10.2009 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Madhepura in A.B.P.No.271/2009 by which the accused opposite party no.2 has been granted anticipatory bail in Madhepura P.S. Case No.280/2009 under Sections 406 and 420 of the I.P.C. Heard Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. J.K.Singh, the learned counsel for the State. The main grievance of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that after suppressing the real fact, the opposite party no.2 has got the anticipatory bail and secondly, after the grant of anticipatory bail, the opposite party no.2 is tampering with the evidence and 2 threatening the petitioner as well as their witnesses. The learned counsel for the State submits that more than two years have passed after the impugned order and the petitioner may raise his grievance before the learned trial court. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State, it appears that contention of the learned counsel for the State is correct. The petitioner is at liberty to raise his grievance before the learned trial court. This petition stands disposed of. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)