IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1190 of 2010 RAM BABU SAHNI, S/o Sri Deoki Sahni. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 22.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that in the present case the petitioner is neither named in the First Information Report nor identified in the Test Identification Parade and on the basis of recovery of the alleged looted motor-cycle another case was instituted and the petitioner remanded in the present case on the basis of such recovery, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 04.08.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 139 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case - 2 - of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. It has been submitted that the petitioner is accused in three other cases which fact will be verified by the Magistrate before releasing the petitioner on bail and if it is found to be incorrect the petitioner will not be released on bail. The learned Magistrate will consider the possibility of amalgamating the present case with Maniyari P.S. Case No. 76 of 2009 which arises out of the same occurrence. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)