HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) N0. 1398 of2009 PETITIONER _ Ramssh Chandra 'Pandey, son of late Pandit Chandrashekhar Pandey, resident of Ram Mandir Road, Bramhanpara Amblkapur Surguja, Dlstnct Surguja (Chhamsgarh) «VERSUS . The Secretary, State of Chhattisgarh, Public Works and Nagriya Nikay, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). Assistant Director, Town Administration and Development Department, DKS Bhawan, Mantfalaya, [Raipurl(Chhattisgarh). . The Deputy Registrar, Town Administration, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (ChhattiSgarh). (WRIT PEImON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTHUHON OF INDIA) :(SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K Agnmom, Jt) ' Present : Shri H B Agrawal Sr. Advocate with Ms. Rinki Tamrakar, Advocate] for the petitioner 51m Y S Thakur Deputy Advocate General for the State » RESPONDENTS r ORAL ORDER (Passed on 17m day orMmh, 2009) With the consent 0t the partres the matter Is taken up for hearing finally 1. Learned counsel app/mg tor the petitioner submits that the case being payment of retiral benefits‘matter, may be referred to the PenSIOn Committee“ 2. This Court, in the matter of W.P. N034642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs'. The 'State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of the retiral dues as the ' ' f disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed . in .P. No. 191/206 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government W 60 ‘and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105/2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgnent and order dated 3-1“ ofJanumy, 2008 passed in wiP. No; 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh arid others) and other connected matters, as submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the parties ' 3. ,ThiS‘petition is disposed of in the same terms Le; the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee; within a ' period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and a copy ofthe papers 00m the petition. Thereaiter the Committee shall issue notlce to the petitioner and the otheers concerned Within a further period of 15 days The Committee shall conSider and pass order in accordance With law atter aEording proper opportunity ot hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise,‘including payment of retiral dues, if any, to. the petitioner, may be completed Within a period of four months hom the date ofreceipt of a copy ofthis order. . One extra copy of the papers of the petition shall be supplied by the learned counsel appéring‘fdi' the petitioner to Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, today itself, for transferring the same to the committee. K Consequently, pendin applications, if any, stand disposed of. g Sdl— Satish K Agnihotrii Judge Sahu