THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.136 of 2005 ORDER: It appears, aggrieved by proceedings dated 10.07.2001 of the second respondent issued under Section 10(6) of the Urban Land Ceiling Act, whereby the Enquiry Officer was authorized to take possession of land to an extent of 425.55 sq. mts. in Ward 17 of Madannapet, belonging to the petitioner and which is declared as surplus, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Commissioner, Appeals, Office of the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Hyderabad, who, by order dated 04.02.2004, allowed the appeal setting aside the order under appeal. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite setting aside the proceedings issued under Section 10(6) of the Act in the appeal preferred by her, the respondents are making attempts to interfere with her peaceful possession and enjoyment in respect of the subject lands. Hence, this writ petition is filed. It is to be noticed that in view of adoption of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999, in the State of Andhra Pradesh with effect from 27.03.2008, further proceedings under the Act, in respect of the subject land, stood abated. Be that as it may, according to the petitioners, the proceedings issued under Section 10(6) of the Act, in respect of the subject land, are quashed in the appeal preferred by her, and this aspect is not disputed by the respondents. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the subject land. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU,J 18.11.2010 v v