LriJHEHIGH CQURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Criminal Reyisipn No. .S.S3..../2011 AppUcant : Durgesh Patel S/o Late Ram (Non applicant before Narayan Patel, Aged about 26 the learned faaUy eourt) years, R/o ViUage Baloda Beaes (Indira Colony) Ward No.6, P.S. & i^Z^- j Tahsil Baloda Bazar, Disfa-ict ^^'sftf^:%: Raipur(c-G-) ••^"""""- Non-Applicants : 1) Smt. Pushpawati Patel W/o (AppUcants before the Durgesh Patel Aged about 22 Learaed famity court) years. 2) Tasmay, S/o Durgesh Patel, aged about 8 months, miaor through legal his natural guardian mother naiaely Smt. Pushpawati Patel, w/o Durgesh Patel, R/o ViUa^e Baloda Bazar, District Ralpur (C.G.), Presently residing at Village Loharsi, PoUce Station Shivrinarayan, TahsU Pamgarh, Disfa'iet Jaiygr'Chgapa (C.G.) (wrongly mentioned Distorict Raipur (C.G.) in fhe order dated 03/08/2011) MEMO OF REVISION UNDBR SECTIQN FAMILY COURT ACT 1984 f4)OF :•? ^l'l>h^—-^"":'"^ "'l *^3'~:^^K-S^. 'YS ^SI •^l^ld'l, ^TITOTS, T5T?TOf^^ __...^&.-:.^:.^ll']. sn^f^^ ('i?f3<<?) Sf^f W Ri-tiq' 3?^?T shfrl1<ft Dsepti SB : Hon'ble Shri iVlanindra Mohari •S4.10.201'1 Shri Sameer Singh, counsel i^r the applicant. Heard on admission. This petition has been ftled b^ vaiidity of order dated 3/8/201 1 by| maintenance has been rejected aniti son. 4-earned counsei for the app| found that the wife was not entitied without sufficient reasons, the maintenance to the minor. In the opinion of this Court, th| maintenance to the non-applicant perversity. When the marriage and ri is under an obliaation to maintain th^ ground for interference is made out maintenance of the minor is only R appiicant is a teacher and earning Court. The revision is therefore dismi! +i<4fo<fl-( vim^i ^ fe'<? ^R?R 'afi'sifa*T sn^i Shrivastava. J. the petitioner assaiiing the correctness and which though wife's appiication for grant of Rs.1500/- has been awarded to the minor |icant submined that the Court beiow having |to maintenance as she was iiving separately Cojurt below committed iliegaiity in awarding order passed bythe Famlty Court awarding ^0.2 does not suffers from any illegaitty or flarentage both are not disputed, the applicant i^ minor child. in the oDinion of this Court. no Imore so when the total amount awarded for R^.1500/- per montfi andconsidering that the ps.6,000/'- per month as held by the Family fesed. ?Aa^ndta "*judSe sd':nS^vastava ?AoMa&: •!^*:.'ii.^'>"!l5»II.3?,<1SI.Tt?Tta—l'S/140—2/20'I--1.50,000