IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14111 of 2011 ----------- Dr.Vijay Shankar Rai, son of Sri Bhola Rai, presently posted as Principal, Jagjivan College, Gaya, resident of Sherghati, P.O. & P.S. Sherghati, District- Gaya……….. Petitioner Versus 1. The Magadh University, Bodh Gaya through Registrar 2. The Vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 3. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 4. The Selection Committee of Magadh Unviersity through the Chairman. 5. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna…………………… Respondents. ---------------------------------- For the petitioner: Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For University: Mr. Hansraj, Advocate For the State: Kumari Amrita, G.P.10 Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Upadhayay, A.C. to G.P.10. ----------- 4. 12.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsels for the University and for the State. The petitioner has come to this Court against the corrigendum to the earlier Recruitment Notice No.487/GIA dated 23.10.2008 published in the newspaper on 29.7.2011, by which the break up of vacancies have been changed which, according to the petitioner, is contrary to the directions of the Apex Court contained in the order dated 6.5.2011, in which the cancellation of earlier appointments was under challenge. 2 The further grievance of the petitioner is that the points of academic achievements, for which 80 % marks have been fixed by the statute, have not been calculated by the Selection Committee and thus the appointment process is vitiated, as the interview can only be held thereafter. Learned counsel for the University produces a copy of the Corrigendum dated 9.10.2011 of the University, in which it is stated that the reservation roster published as per the earlier Recruitment Notice dated 23.10.2008 shall be followed and the present corrigendum dated 29.7.2011 is withdrawn. In view of the aforesaid Corrigendum dated 9.10.2011, the grievance of the petitioner with regard to the first point has been redressed. So far as the second issue is concerned, this Court cannot presume that the authorities of the University, even after the matter has been settled by a Division Bench of this Court and the Apex Court, will not proceed according to the statutes as directed by the Apex Court. The challenge by the petitioner in this regard appears to be premature. 3 The writ application is, accordingly, dismissed. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)