IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2008 / 19TH CHAITHRA 1930 RP.No. 254 of 2008(V) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.30218/2007 Dated 19/11/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS ----------------------------------- 1. N.XAVIER,S/O.NALLATHAMPI, CONVENOR, HEADLOAD & GENERAL WORKERS UNION (CITU) THOLLUKUZHI UNIT, PERUMKADAVILA PANCHAYAT NEYYATTINKARA TALUK. 2. K.PURUSHOTHAMAN,S/O.KUMARA PILLAI, CONVENOR, HEADLOAD & GENERAL WORKERS UNION (BMS) DO..DO.. 3. J.JOSEPH,S/O.JOHN CONVENOR, HEADLOAD & GENERAL WORKERS UNION (INTUC) DO..DO... BY ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VELLARADA ,NEYYATTINKARA,TALUK. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARYAMKODE POLICE STATION NEYYATTINKARA. 3. M.ASHOKAN, VADAKKUMKARA VEEDU PAZHYANJIKUZHI, THOLLUKUZHI PERUMKADA VILA P.O.NEYYATTINKARA. 4. K.DIVAKARAN S/O.KRISHNAN KIZHAKKUMKARA PUTHEN VEEDU, PAZHANJIKUZHI ,DO..DO... 5. N.ASARI, WORKING IN KSEB RP 254/2008 NIDHIN NIVAS, DO...DO.. 6. FRANCIS,S/O. KESAVAN NADAR THEKKUMKARA PUTHEN VEEDU PAZHANJIKUZHI ,DO..DO.. 7. ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER NEYYATTINKARA P.O. BY ADV.SRI.AJITH KRISHNAN SRI.R.GOPAN. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.A.SALIM. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 08/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & K.P.BALACHANDRAN, JJ. ----------------------------------------- R.P.NO.254/2008 IN W.P.(C) NO. 30218 OF 2007-V ----------------------------------------- Dated 8th April, 2008. ORDER Balakrishnan Nair, J. While disposing of the writ petition, we noticed the submission made by the learned Government Pleader that as per the instruction of the Assistant Labour Officer, the workmen of Thollukuzhi area have not worked at Pazhanjikuzhi. The review petitioners submit, the A.L.O has not given any instruction in this regard to the learned Government Pleader. But, the learned Government Pleader handed over to us the written instruction received by him. The police have given written instruction to the learned Government Pleader, in which they claim that such an information was received from the A.L.O. Therefore, we do not find any apparent error in recording the submission of the learned Government Pleader. But, it is clarified that the review petitioners will not be bound by that submission of the learned Government Pleader. The competent authority adjudicating the RP 254/2008 2 dispute shall take a decision on all the points raised by the parties, including the above point, based on the evidence and materials before it. The Review Petition is disposed of as above. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. K.P.BALACHANDRAN, JUDGE. Nm/