IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.390 of 2010 1. GAURI SHANAKR PRASAD S/O LATE SUKAR SAO R/O VILL.- KENDUA, P.S. SIRDALA, DISTT.- NAWADA 2. SHITAL PRASAD S/O LATE PUNA SAO R/O VILL.- KENDUA, P.S. SIRDALA, DISTT.- NAWADA Versus 1. CHANDRIKA PRASAD S/O LATE PUNA SAO R/O VILL.- KENDUA, P.O. G.B.KENDUA, P.S. SIRDALA, DISTT.- NAWADA 2. SMT. KANCHAN DEVI W/O ARUN KUMAR SAO R/O VILL.- KENDUA, P.O. G.B.KENDUA, P.S. SIRDALA, DISTT.- NAWADA 3. ADITYA KUMAR S/O LATE SHIVLAL PRASAD R/O VILL.- KENDUA, P.O. G.B.KENDUA, P.S. SIRDALA, DISTT.- NAWADA 4. KANHAI LAL S/O LATE SHIVLAL PRASAD R/O VILL.- KENDUA, P.O. G.B.KENDUA, P.S. SIRDALA, DISTT.- NAWADA 5. KIRAN DEVI D/O LATE SHIVLAL PRASAD R/O VILL.- KENDUA, P.O. G.B.KENDUA, P.S. SIRDALA, DISTT.- NAWADA 6. PUSHPA DEVI D/O LATE SHIVLAL PRASAD R/O VILL.- KENDUA, P.O. G.B.KENDUA, P.S. SIRDALA, DISTT.- NAWADA 7. BASUDEO PRASAD S/O LATE CHHATAR DHARI SAO R/O VILL.- KENDUA, P.O. G.B.KENDUA, P.S. SIRDALA, DISTT.- NAWADA 8. LAKHIYA DEVI W/O LATE MAUZI LAL SAO 9. SUMITRA DEVI @ DEYA DEVI W/O MAHAJAN SAO @ MURARI SAO R/O VILL.- NIMAM, P.S. SITAMARHI, DISTT.- NAWADA 10. PARWATI DEVI W/O LATE MAUZI LAL SAO R/O VILL.- SIDHAUL, P.O. LAUNDH, P.S. SIRDALA, DISTT.- NAWADA 11. SANPHUL DEVI W/O LATE PRASADI SAO R/O VILL.- CHAUGAON, P.O. LAUNDH, P.S. SIRDALA, DISTT.- NAWADA 12. PHULWANTI DEVI W/O RAM BALAK SAO R/O VILL.- CHAUMUHA, P.S. SIRDALA, DISTT.- NAWADA 13. SHEELA DEVI W/O SARJUN SAO VILL.- TAROPUR, P.S.- NARHAT, DISTT.- NAWADA 14. BHUSHAN PRASAD S/O LATE KAILASH SAO R/O VILL.- SIKANDARPUR, P.S. WAZIRGANJ, DISTT.- GAYA 15. SHAMBHU PRASAD S/O SRI SHANKAR SAO R/O VILL.- BIJBAN, P.O. RAJAULI, DISTT.- NAWADA 16. MANIK CHAND PRASAD S/O SRI SHANKAR SAO R/O VILL.- BIJBAN, P.O. RAJAULI, DISTT.- NAWADA 17. DILIP KUMAR S/O SRI SHANKAR SAO R/O VILL.- BIJBAN, P.O. RAJAULI, DISTT.- NAWADA 18. MANTI D/O SHANKAR SAO R/O VILL.- BIJBAN, P.O. RAJAULI, DISTT.- NAWADA 19. SHANKAR SAO S/O LATE PUNIT SAO R/O VILL.- BIJBAN, P.O. RAJAULI, DISTT.- NAWADA. ----------- 08. 27.01.2011 The appellants are aggrieved by the order dated 03.04.2010 passed by the Civil Judge-1, Nawada in Title 2 Partition Suit No. 95 of 2007 by which he has refused injunction on application filed by the appellants. On going through the order impugned, I find that the Court below has considered the documents filed on behalf of the parties and concluded that the appellants did not have a prima facie case for an injunction. On specific query from the appellants, I am informed that after the order dated 03.04.2010 no construction has been made by the defendants and, therefore, there is no need for immediate protection of the suit properties. In view of such, this appeal is dismissed. It is desirable that the suit which is between close family members should be concluded within a period of one year in which both the parties commit themselves to co-operate in the same. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)