1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.343 OF 2000 FROM ORDER NO.343 OF 2000 FROM ORDER NO.343 OF 2000 Shaikh Mohiuddin Master ...Appellant Vs. Narendra Gupta ...Respondent Ms Ratna Bhargawan i/b Mr.M.P.Vashi for the Appellant. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: FEBRUARY 4,2005. FEBRUARY 4,2005. FEBRUARY 4,2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. One of the objections is that typed copy of the impugned order dated 18th January 2000 is not filed. The learned Counsel for the Appellant stated that repeatedly notes were filed in the office for seeking inspection of the papers. She stated that though notes for inspection were filed inspection was not given. 2. A grievance has been repeatedly made before me in number of matters that though the High Court Appellate Side Rules provide for grant of inspection to the Advocates as a matter of right, there is no machinery available in the office for accepting notes praying for grant of inspection and for giving inspection to the Advocates expeditiously. A grievance has been made by some Advocates that even notes sought to be filed for seeking inspection are not accepted by the concerned Branches. 2 3. The Registrar (Judicial) to look into the matter and to submit a report to this Court within three weeks from today. The report to suggest the procedure for accepting the notes for inspection of Record and Proceedings and for grant of inspection within a reasonable time to the Advocate/s. If such procedure is evolved, unauthorised tampering by the Advocate’s Clerks and Advocate/s of the original papers can be avoided. Judge. Judge. Judge.