IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 14008 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.08.2011 Kuldip Kumar Kaura ..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Ms. Monika Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that although petitioner has moved representation (Annexure P/1) followed by a notice (Annexure P/5), yet nothing has been done by the respondents so far. Even the Government has asked the Block Development and Panchayat Officer, Sidhwan Bet, District Ludhiana (respondent No.3) to make inquires against former Sarpanch – Mrs. Kirana Devi, but the respondents are sleeping over the matter. Learned counsel states that the authorities be directed to take decision on the representation (Annexure P/1) and notice (Annexure P/5) within such time as fixed by this Court. Without expressing any opinion on the merit as well as on the maintainability of the complaint and notice, Annexures P/1 and P/5 respectively, respondent No. 3 is directed to take decision thereon within 90 days from the date certified copy of this order is placed before him, in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of. (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE 04.08.2011 som