IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 16045 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 8th February, 2011. Charanjit Singh Petitioner through Mr. R.P.Daaria, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Sumeet Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 03.06.2010 [Annexure P-1] passed by respondent No. 2 – Commission on a complaint received from respondent No.3. The Commission though has filed its reply/affidavit defending the impugned order, however, respondent No. 3 has filed her affidavit to the effect that with the intervention of the respectables of the society, the matter has been amicably settled between her and the petitioner and in terms of the said compromise, she has given an undertaking not to pursue the case pertaining to the FIR got registered by her against the petitioner. Having regard to the contents of the affidavit and the fact that it will be in the larger public interest to support the cause of peace and social harmony, I accept the compromise and consequent thereto, quash the impugned order dated 03.06.2010. Disposed of. Dasti. February 08, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE