IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. 41863 of 2008 and Criminal Misc. No.M-23740 of 2008 Date of decision : 16.9.2008 Jyoti and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate for the petitioners. S. D. ANAND, J. Criminal Misc. No. 41863 of 2008 The Criminal Misc. application is allowed. Photographs are taken on record. Criminal Misc. No.M-23740 of 2008 The respondent-State shall ensure that the petitioners shall have the similar constitutional protection which is available to all the citizens of the country under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The reiteration of that obvious constitutional guarantee would not be inferred to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the averments in the course of the petition qua the factum/validity of their matrimonial alliance. Disposed of accordingly. September 16, 2008 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE Note: Whether to be referred to Reporter: Yes/No