IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3148 of 2010 1. MD.ALI AZAM 2. MD GAISUL AZAM 3. IDRISH GADDI --------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 25.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the informant and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that land dispute is there in between the parties. For the incident of the same day, counter case is also lodged. All the injuries except injury of Gaisul Azam by means of iron rod which is said grievous are simple in nature. Further it is said that all the injured were discharged from Primary Health Centre while the injured from petitioners’ side referred to District Hospital and there is no repetition of iron blow by Gaisul Azam also. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah in Balthar P.S. Case No. 18 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)