IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.994 of 2011 SUNIL YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 11.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Murliganj P.S. Case no. 168/2010 registered under section 302/34 of the IPC and 25(I-B)A,26 of the Arms Act. As per prosecution case itself, informant came to know about name of the assailants from the mouth of the deceased and as per prosecution case itself, the deceased did not disclose the name of the petitioner as his assailant. Perusal of the impugned order of the learned Sessions Judge, Madhepura reveals that in course of investigation, some witnesses claimed to have heard the name of petitioner as assailant of the deceased. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, petitioner Sunil Yadav is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Murliganj P.S. Case no. 168 of 2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)