IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3435 of 2011 BHIKHARI SAH @ BIPIN BIHARI SAH . Versus JAGARNATH SAH & ORS . ----------- 03. 21.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is the plaintiff in Partition Suit No. 219 of 2006, aggrieved by the order dated 27.9.2008 of the Sub-Judge-I, Bettiah, West Champaran declining to grant injunction against the defendant from alienation of the Suit property during the pendency of the Suit. This order has been affirmed in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 22 of 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in fact no partition by metes and bounds had taken place earlier. The impugned order is well considered and reasoned arriving at a satisfaction that there was a partition between the parties earlier. In fact in paragraph-5 of the writ petition the petitioner himself acknowledges that the parties “got themselves separated after 1972 and came in possession of the property in accordance with their convenience”. The Court finds no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)