1 wp-3015-10.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Writ Petition No. 3015 of 2010 Reshma Jaed Shaikh .. Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr .. Respondents. Mr Amol Joshi i/by Subhash Hulyalkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr D.P. Adsule, A.P.P.for the State. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR & A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 18TH JANUARY,2011. P.C.:- 1. None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called out. The Police Officer is present in the Court to instruct the learned A.P.P. In the circumstances, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. In the event, the petitioner moves the application for restoration of this petition, same will be considered on the condition that the petitioner shall compensate the State as the Police Officer has visited the Court to 2 wp-3015-10.doc attend this proceeding specially. 2. Later on, Mr Amol Joshi mentioned the matter for restoration and recalling the earlier order dismissing the petition for default. Learned A.P.P. submits that he has no objection for restoration of the writ petition provided the petitioner compensates the State by paying reasonable cost as the police officer had attended this matter to give instructions to the learned APP and was present in the Court who had came all the way from Pune with the original record and had to leave after disposal of the matter in the morning Session. We have no difficulty in accepting this plea of the learned APP. 3. Accordingly, the order passed in the morning session is recalled on condition that the petitioner shall pay cost quantified in the sum of Rs.5,000/- to be deposited in Account No. 0055, State Treasury Account for Police Department within one week from today failing which the earlier order shall stand revived. Subject to above, list the matter on 9.2.2011. (A.R.JOSHI,J) (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J)