^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Contempt Case (Civill No. 2-06 Ongla Benclk /2011 PETITIONER ^0^.--'^..^ A- ^'..<se""^f^ ^.^" ^^ ^%:f^ RESPONDENT Conteninor :- yRahul Birtharey, aged about 37 years, ^ S/o Shri O.P. Biftharey, Occupation - Advocacy, R/o F-104, Am.ba Towers, Vinoba Nagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur - (C.G.). VERSUS H.K. Jushi, Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Bilaspur Division, Nahru Nagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1950, READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF THE COURT ACT. f~ \^^ s^^ 'XI-HC—78 . sa%?i TI ft-ii* -''•£,''113iI^T 'XW 75ET ^!<L{id-4, QTil-H'Ko, ^Rirey .(^..^..-..r.<fc^..cy..2^2' an^r -^^ (^fg^?) •R<IIW^fe?3t^I SB : Hon'ble 8Strl Manlndra iMohan Shrivastava. J. 21.7.2011 Shri RahTil Birfharey, p^titioner m person. Heard on admission. This petition has been f^ disobedlence of order dated No.6532/10. led by the petitioner aUegmg wUlful 2nd May, 2011 passed in W.P. (C) The petitioner argued fh| the counsel for the Chhatti^arh information shall be suppliedt the petitioner copies of varioi as well as successor State ol Finance Scheme, but, fh< Chhattisgarh has not been information, the order of the Clie A perusal ofthe order d the submission made by learajed 4/C.Q. Housing Board, in finalty disposed of. The statem^i fher& is no objection in mformaticm sought for by the prov|d <til<<i<-<<il-1 iWRlf 'A' fS'zt <Rn<;i< ^•sifinsn^i at though a statement was made by Housing Board that necessary the respondents have supplied to ^s circulars issued by fhe erstwhile Madhya Pradesh relatmg to Setf- policy of Housing Board of [ipplied and by not supplied fhose has been violated. Qourt jated 2nd May, 2011 shows fhat on coumsel for respondente No.3 & writ petition, the petition was fent made before the Court was fhat (ding another certffied copy af fhe tiietltioner. r-ifm^teSKwia^d^iw^^^i^W^^'^.^ T »., XI-HC—78 ^^ "41<41C1<<, 0Tll«< , ls<tfl<rfy sn^T "[ra^ ('^3^1) sn^i ^ii l^'ii'* ,i •qrsn^i'ai^R? Praveea'- + wiiwgftg-CT^i -2- From fhe records of W.F|. the application of the petitiocje that petitioner be supplied i|r Scheme tw Chhattisgarh H); 12.5.2011 (Annexure C-3), tl-l< many as suc circiilars relatin^ the aUegation of the petitional formation of fhe Chbattisgarl^ policies were fl'ained in have been wifhheld from fhe of fhis Court, no contempt 1s [(C} No;6532/10, it 1s reveated (hat njer for supply of information stated i|nfonnation regarding Self-Finance lausing Board. Victe letter dated (e petitioner has been supplied as to Self-Finance Scheme. It is not la fhe contempt petition that after Housing Board in fhe-y^a- 2004, of earlier policies, which ^etitioner. Therefore, m the opinlon diade out. supetrsession The petition is therefo Uberty to the petitioner to available to him under the R/ asserts that any ofher relevan the respondents, has not been ^)T4t?TI(H 'WMt ^ 1^^ tf^R^R ^?afl?TO3n^r i|re dismissed, however, reserving t^ke recourse to remedy of appeal .T.1. Act, 2005 in case the petitioner t. information though available wifh |suppUed to hini. Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge i?--.-.. ^-^F3'£?fn=^/^7 %B^eS^S@5i§3^?iB