1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No. 6893 of 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 24 OF 2008(D) Jimmy Construction Pvt. Ltd. A Private Company Vs. Union of India And Others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Shri Nitin Rode Adv for appellant. Shri P. S. Lambat Adv for respondent. CORAM: C. L. PANGARKAR J. Dated: 30 th SEPTEMBER, 2009. Heard counsel for the appellant and the respondent. This application has been filed by the respondent Union of India for speaking to minutes. While deciding First Appeal No. 24 of 2008 this Court had directed the respondent No.1 Union of India through General Manager South Eastern Railways to reconstitute the arbital. It was directed that the railway should nominate their own arbital and call 2 upon the appellant to furnish the name of proposed arbitrator on behalf of the appellant. This judgment was delivered by this Court on 19.03.2008. It is the contention of the respondent No.1 that the respondent No.1 i.e. the South Eastern Railways has been trifurcated and the one which is now concerned is South East Central Railway. It is submitted that the General Manager of the South East Central Railway has prepared a panel of arbitrator who should be appointed on the said arbital. Counsel for the appellant brings to my notice that the appellant has preferred another Misc. Civil Application before the High Court wherein a prayer has been made to quash this communication dated 17.04.08 by which a panel of arbitrators has been appointed by the South East Central Railway. Since the said letter is under challenge before another Bench in another Misc. Civil Application this application for speaking to minutes is not maintainable, the same is therefore rejected. JUDGE svk 3 4 5 6