1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 598 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 598 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 598 OF 2004 Cosmopolitan Sports Club ... Petitioner Versus Bombay Municipal Corporation Respondents None for the Petitioner. Ms. T. Puranik for Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : MARCH 20, 2006 DATED : MARCH 20, 2006 DATED : MARCH 20, 2006 P.C. . In view of the introduction of Section 37A of the M.R.T.P. Act, the Petitioners were permitted to use the play ground for 30 days in a calender year for marriaage and other religious social functions. That permission was revoked as can be seen from Notice dated 17.1.2003, in view of the injuction whereby the petitioners and the B.M.C. were restrained from permitting the use of the land for marriage functions. . It is thus clear that revocation of the permission by the Corporation was only because of 2 the injunction. After the injunction is vacated, it will be open to the Petitioners to apply for necessary permission to B.M.C. and B.M.C. to dispose of the same according to Law. With the above observations, Rule discharged. No order as to costs. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)