Crl. Misc. No. M-15913 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-15913 of 2010 Date of decision : 05.10.2010 Balwinder Kaur ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. R.K. Kapila, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shilesh Gupta, D.A.G., Punjab Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned State Counsel, on instructions from H.C. Joginder Singh, has pointed out that charges have been framed in this case and case was slated for evidence of prosecution. 2. In this view of the matter, the present petition has become infructuous in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in Minakshi Bala v. Sudhir Sharma 1994(3) RCR Criminal 123. 3. Faced with the situation, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioner to raise all the points involved in the instant petition at the time of challenging the order of framing charge before the Sessions Judge along with application of condonation of delay or at any subsequent stage in the trial Court. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Crl. Misc. No. M-15913 of 2010 -2- 5. Needless to say that the concerned Court would consider the application for condonation of delay sympathetically. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge October 05, 2010 naresh.k