IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 6TH OCTOBER 2009 / 14TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 27938 of 2009(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ROSAMMA P.D., UPSA, ST.MARY'S UPSA, PERUMPUNNA, P.O.PERUMPUNNA, PERAVOOR VIA, KANNUR DISTRICT - 670 673. BY ADV. SRI.POOVAMULLE PARAMBIL ABDULKAREEM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 14. 3. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THALASSERY. 4. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, IRITTY. 5. THE CORPORATE MANAGER, THE CORPORATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY, ARCH DIOCESE OF THALASSERY 1, KANNUR DISTRICT. SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI MUHAMOOD T.T THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.27938/2009-J ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 6th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the delay in disposal of Ext.P7 revision petition filed before the first respondent Government. 2. The petitioner was appointed as U.P.S.A, against one of the U.P.S.A posts sanctioned as per Ext.P1, by the Manager and she joined duty on 11/09/2007. Even though the Manager forwarded the proposal, for approval, to the fourth respondent, the approval was declined for the reason that the school is incomplete and uneconomic and that a vacancy arising in uneconomic schools should be filled up with protected teachers. Ext.P3 is the copy of the said order. The petitioner filed a detailed representation as per Ext.P5 before the second respondent. While Ext.P5 was pending the second respondent passed Ext.P6 order, whereby, the appeal filed by the Manager against Ext.P3 was rejected, against which the petitioner has filed Ext.P7 revision petition. 3. There will be a direction to the first respondent to take a decision on Ext.P7 along with any other revision petition if any filed by the W.P.(C). No.27938/2009 -:2:- Manager, after hearing the petitioner and the Manager within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms