IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1447 of 2008 RANG BAHADUR RAI . Versus B.S.E.B & ORS . ----------- 3. 02.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent Board. Noticing the nature of the controversy, the writ Court had granted liberty to file a representation before the Superintending Engineer who shall examine factual aspect of the matter including the date of energizing line, installation of the meter etc., that has been done and a reasoned order passed on 14.6.2008. In view of the nature of the direction contained in the writ petition, the correctness of the order dated 14.6.2008 cannot be examined in the contempt proceedings. If the petitioner is aggrieved with the same, his remedy lies before the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum constituted under the Electricity Act, 2003 or before this Court in a fresh writ petition as he may be advised. The contempt proceeding stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)