ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 916 OF APPEAL NO. 916 OF APPEAL NO. 916 OF 2006 2006 2006 State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Appellants. Vs. Laxman Tukaram Nimse & Ors. ...Respondents. Ms.S.P.Manchekar, AGP for the State. Mr.P.N.Joshi for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr.Sonwalkar for Respondent No.4. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 10th April, 2008 : 10th April, 2008 : 10th April, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . This is the State Appeal arising out of the Land Reference No.589 of 1997 alongwith Land Reference Nos. 588 of 1997 and 590 of 1997 to 593 of 1997. The notification is common. The land in question is situated at village Sanjegaon, Taluka Igatpuri, District Nashik. Therefore, all Appeals in all respect heard and decided common. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the State of Maharashtra relied on a Division Bench Judgment of this Court in First Appeal Nos.1339 to 1359 of 2006, First Appeal Nos.1339 to 1359 of 2006, First Appeal Nos.1339 to 1359 of 2006, The The The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Vs. Punja Trambak State of Maharashtra & Ors. Vs. Punja Trambak State of Maharashtra & Ors. Vs. Punja Trambak Lahamage, Lahamage, Lahamage, dated 27th March, 2008 dated 27th March, 2008 dated 27th March, 2008. In Paragraph 16 it is observed as under:- "16. For the reasons aforestated, we partly allow the State Appeals as well as ( 2 ) cross-objections to the extent aforereferred. To conclude, the claimants would be entitled to the following reliefs: a) The claimants would be entitled to receive compensation for acquisition of their lands in identical terms as granted by this Court in First Appeal No. 1171 of 2007 as more particularly referred to in paragraph No.5 of this Judgment." 3. Therefore, the learned counsel appearing for the Respondents-Claimants also fairly considered in view of the Division Bench Judgement as it covers and concludes a rival submissions in identical terms raised by the parties. 4. In view of this the present Appeal is also allowed in terms of para 16(a) of the above Judgment (Supra) (Supra) (Supra) as reproduced hereinabove. 5. Appeal is allowed. ( 3 ) . No costs. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)