1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 1434/2010. Hari K. Patil -: versus :- Vinod D. Patil and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : APRIL 5, 2010. Heard Shri A.M. Ahirrao, learned counsel for petitioner. Respondent / plaintiff has already closed his evidence and then amendment was sought by petitioner / defendant. Facts sought to be amended are old and were available when written statement was filed. Application does not contain any reason as to why written statement could not be amended earlier. In this situation, I do not find any jurisdictional error or perversity in the approach of the trial Court. Writ Petition is therefore, dismissed. No cost. JUDGE Rgd.