IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND TEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.16006 of 2009 Between: Sunil Kumar Debnath … Petitioner And The Station House Officer, P.S. Neredmet, Cyberabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Veerijana Praveen Kumar Counsel for respondent No.1: AGP for Home This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.16006 of 2009 ORDER:- In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that having registered Crime No.265 of 2009 on 19.07.2009, respondent No.1 has not completed the investigation and filed the report. In the manner in which the writ petition is proposed to be disposed of, it is not necessary to record the facts in detail. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that on 13.08.2009 when she received instructions, the investigation into the crime was almost completed and that respondent No.1 gave instructions to the Government Pleader that he will file an appropriate report in a short time. The learned Assistant Government Pleader is unable to say whether a report has been filed so far or not. Inasmuch as substantial time had elapsed from the time of instructions given by respondent No.1, it is reasonable to presume that he would have filed the report by now. If appropriate report is not filed so far, respondent No.1 shall file the same within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.21020 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 08.06.2010 ES