/ Sti^e IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) W.P. (S)No.2.67^ / 2009 PETITIONER ,^.<^ ^r^w^ Kaushal Kishore Pathak, S/o. Ram ^ Sharan Pathak, aged about 54 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, ^\^^^ ^^ f\^^ Mata Rukhmani Kanya Ashram, >"<>^\^" . '^ Dimrapal, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS ^" (1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of school Examination, Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) r" (2) The Director, Directorate ofC.G. Public Education Department, Raipur (C.G.) /' (3) The District Education Officer, Office of District Education Officer, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) (4) The Coinmissioner, Tribal Development, Raipur (C.G.) (5) Mata Rukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, thr. Its Secretary, Mata Rukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tahsil - Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl N0.2678/2009 PETITiONER Kaushal Kishore Pathak RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: - Shri Vinod Deshmukh, counsel for the petitioner. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDERfORAU (Passed on this 11tn day of November, 2009) 1. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finaily. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision ofthis Court rendered in Smt A. Lall v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others1, thus the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to decide his case in the light of afore-stated decision, subject to verificatlon asto whether the respondent No.5 Institute is a Govemment aided school and the petitioner is a teacher within the sanctioned strength. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be wnsidered and decided, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 4. In view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge Tumane 1 2007(1)8u 265