Civil Writ Petition No. 7731 of 2011 -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 7731 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 3.5.2011 Milkha Singh .......... Petitioner Versus Punjab State Transmission Corporation Limited & others ...... Respondents **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present : Mr. H.K. Brinda, Advocate for the petitioner. **** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL) In the present writ petition the petitioner is claiming the benefit of work charged service from 13.11.1969 to 20.10.1977 rendered by him with the respondent-corporation, prior to regularization of his service for counting the period for fixing his pension and other retrial benefits. The petitioner relies upon a Full Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Kesar Singh vs. State of Punjab 1989(1) RSJ 629 in support of his claim. It has further been stated that the process was initiated for counting the service of the petitioner as work charged employee prior to his retirement, but till date no decision has been taken thereon. Civil Writ Petition No. 7731 of 2011 -2- Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner shall make a detailed representation with regard to his claim of counting the work charged service, which he had rendered with the respondent-Corporation, within a period of two weeks from today and direction may be issued to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner and take a decision with some specified time. Without going into the merits of the case or commenting thereon the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation to the respondents with regard to his claim, which he has made in the present writ petition, within a period of two weeks from today. In case, if such a representation is made, the same be considered and decision be taken thereon by Sr. Executive Engineer, Operation Division, Punjab State Transmission Corporation Limited, Roopnagar-respondent No.2, within a period of three months. Decision so taken, be conveyed to the petitioner, and in case the petitioner is held entitled to the said claim, the consequential benefits be released and disbursed to the petitioner within a period of two months thereafter. 3.5.2011 (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) 'sp' JUDGE