^ IN TME HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BILASPUR fC.G.Y M. C. C. N0.u^ /20Q6 Singl& Bench Af»l»LlCANT ^l. w ^ ^.\w/ >y ^'2. .<^ ^ y^y ^ .*' ^ ^^ >•' ^~ RESPONDENT C^/trA^ VT^i^ '4<-^^^7?c "^^r^'^J^j^Wc/.c Raj'a Ram Corn Products (P|3) Ltd.,Kothi No. 17,Sector4 Chandigarh ShriSubodh Kumar Gupta Son of Late Shri Rajargrp Oupta Aged about 59 years Managing Director M/s Rajaram Corn Products (Pb) Ltd., Kothi No. 17, Sector 4, Chandigarh VERSUS ^' SuryakantGupta Son oflate Shri Raja Ram Gupta Aged about 50 years Proprietor, M/s Raja Ram Maize Products, Head Office at Komal Niwas Kailash Nagar, Rajnandgaon ^ ^-a^- APPLICATION UNDER ^CK®K=ES10FTHE CODE QF CIVIL fiRQCEDURE FOR RESTORATION OF C.R. Nc?: 1801/2000 tISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION VIDE ORDER DATED .2006 PASSED BY HON'BLE JUSTICE V. K. SHRIVAgTAVA XI-HC-22 3TT^T^T R^J4)3TT^T ^riN 5h^ll<=b ^cT<:qPTR^r, ^Tfl^i^ f^dl^y ^to.,:.c.,..c...-y.^^/66 Nl^ldl $hHlch [d^ 29/08/2006 Shri Sanjay K.Agrawal, Shri P.K.C. Tiwari, Sr. Counselfor the respondent. Heard on I.A.Nos. altowed. Applicant is directed to course of the day. Learned counsel for bothl be heard finatly and decided. Considered. Both the par| Civil Revision No.3 07/08/1006. Petitioner did revision was dismissed. Learned counsel for thel wherein he has stated that tistii^ escaped his notice, therefore, case. Taking i"to account the frankly conceded by him, in restoring the Civit Revision N<^ 07/08/2006. Therefore, the listiijig m|/ <=hl^f<rl41-1 ^l^<nT^'te^'<Rl^<l< ^ 3Tf^TT 3TT^T ^ounsel for the applicant. lAdvocate with Shri Sashi Bhushan, 2728/J2006 and 2729/2006. Not opposed, pcorporate the amendment during the jthe parties submit that this case may I'ies are heard finalty. 1801/J2000 was listed for hearing on ^iot appear on that day, therefore, appiicant has fited his own affidavit of the Civil Revision on 07/08/2006 he could not appear and attend the ierror committed by the counsel and opinion, this is sufficient cause for . 1801/2000 which was dismissed on |order pas^d _on 07/08/2006 is set XI-HC-22 W^T^T f^ri^w^T $h^lch^ri?cT per' raju ov ^ST^Tpn^PT, ^ftOTfg, isi-IWy ^cs/.^ (•mT^tl $h+iich ^ 200 Id-bo^ 3TI^T?^TW^f?cf -2-' aside and Civil Revision No.181 number with a condition that interim orders passed during injunction shall not stand autom< A copy of this order be List the Ciyii Revision No. as prayed. )1/2000 is restored to its originai |l-hough civil revision is restored, yet pe^dency of the civi! revision for stay or xtically restored. in Civil Revision No.1801/2000. 1.801/2000 for hearing within a week, k^pt cbl^?Ql41-l WT^Tt* ^f te^t <Ri<-<.l< ^3T{^T3TT^T Sd/- V.K-Shrivastava Judge (^^fe^)