IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8550 of 2011 SMT.HEMLATA JHA, WIFE OF LATE PROF. RAMA NATH JHA, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- PURANI BAZAR, P.O. JHAJHA, POLICE STATION JHAJHA, DISTRICT JAMUI. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES AND DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR THROUGH ITS VICE CHANCELLOR. 4. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 5. THE REGISTRAR, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 6. THE FINANCE OFFICER, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 7. THE PRINCIPAL, D.S.M. COLLEGE, JHAJHA, JAMUI. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 12.5.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Alok Ranjan, learned A.C. to G.P.17, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2/State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.3 to 6/Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University. The petitioner’s husband retired on 31.8.1999 and subsequently died on 12.9.2009. The husband of the petitioner was Professor in Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University. The petitioner has prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of (i) The arrears of difference of pension of her husband due to revision of pay scale 2 w.e.f. 1.1.1996 w.e.f. 1.1.1999 to March 2007, (ii) The arrears of difference of pension of her husband due to revision of pay scale of 1.1.2006 w.e.f. 1.4.2007 to 12.9.2009, (iii) The arrears of difference of pension of her husband due to merger of 50% D.A. in the basic pay scale for the period of 1.1.2005 to March 2007 w.e.f. 1.1.2005, (iv) The arrears of difference of family pension due to revision of pay scale of 1.1.1996, 1.1.2006 and merger of 50% D.A. in the basic scale w.e.f. 13.9.2009 to uptill now, (v) The arrears of difference of leave salary of her husband in revised pay scale of 1.1.1996 and (vi) The arrears of difference of salary and D.A. w.e.f. July 1982 to 12.9.2009 with statutory interest. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation. In view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the petitioner, there is no need to further keep the matter pending. 3 The writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.4/The Vice Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, it is expected that respondent no.4 will examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.4 is required to pass a speaking order within aforesaid time. If the respondent no.4 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he may pass appropriate order for clearing the dues within aforesaid time. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)