HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR . Misc Appeal No 1380/2004 (DRAM: Hon'ble Shr‘i $.R.Nayak, Chief Jus‘riée & Hon’ble Shri D.R.Deshmukh, J. - v l ‘ . PPELLANTS : 1. Sm'r. Madhulam Swamknr Wd/o Dwarika CLAIMANTS, Pmsad Swarnkar, Aged obouf 21 years. 2. Brizlal 5/0 Harpmsad Swamknr, Aged abouf 47 year's. 3. Sm‘r. Sum'rrm Bai W/o BriJial Swarnknr', Aged ubou‘r 44 year‘s. 4. Ku. Rajeshwar-i Swnrnkar', Guardian her Ifa‘rher' Brijial Swarnkar, Aged abou‘f 16 years. 5. Mohendm Kumar' swarnkur, Guardian his fa‘l'her', Brijlal Swarnkar, Aged abouf 12 years; AII R/o Village-Kamowadih, Posf Nagoi, Police STa‘rion - Kharsia, Tehsil¥Kharsia, Disfricf Raigarh. Versus I RFESPONDENTS 1. Shri Naresh Kumar Var-ma, R/o Transport i i i i i i i i i Nagar, Ko‘rba (Owner of The offending Vehicle). 2. yashwanf Kumar 5/0 Jageshwur Prasdd R/o Nnyarishda Bhadarapam Baico Korba Dis‘rrlc'l' Korba (C 6) (Driver of 1*he offending Vehicle) 3 The New India Insurance Company Limited Transporf Nagar Korba Dis’fricf- Korba (Chhaf‘hsgarh) [INSURER] one appears for The appeiian‘rs ~_ ORAL ORDER v ‘(P‘assed on.24.1;2ooe) The foilowmg oral order of 1+1e Court was passed by SRNAYAK C zv__- A egse.._wm. <4 A V we” _ C A J W i % i 4 J71 The appeal was called ou‘r fwnce for mohon hear-mg On bo'fh e occasions, none appeared nor any represenfa'hon was made on ehalf of fhe appellan+s E 1 In The circumsfance fhe appeal Is dismissed for non-V rosecuhon 1 ' 1 ’Jx’ " * Dlllp Raosaheb Sdl- Cluef Jushce Deshmukh Judge Mr- WW M