IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5121 of 2010 Date of Decision : September 14, 2012 Ramphal and others ....Petitioners Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present : Mr. Shalender Mohan, Advocate T.P.S. Mann, J. (Oral) The plaintiffs have filed the present revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for challenging the order dated 14.8.2012 passed by the trial Court whereby their application for directing the defendants-respondents from producing the site plans has been declined. Admittedly, the site plans in question have been prepared by the District Town Planner. Said District Town Planner has not been arrayed as a party in the suit. Therefore, the defendants, who were other authorities, could not have been directed to produce the site plans. Moreover, the plaintiffs cannot seek assistance of the Court to collect evidence on their behalf. Resultantly, there is no merit in the revision, which is, accordingly, dismissed. ( T.P.S. MANN ) September 14, 2012 JUDGE satish