CRM-M No. 19331 of 2011 **** Laxmi Devi and another v. State of Haryana Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Man Mohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana. **** On 27.06.2011 the following order was passed:- “1. Notice of motion for 12.07.2011. 2. The petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking for anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 173 dated 20.04.2011, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 506 IPC ,Police Station Sampla, Tehsil and District Rohtak. 3. The petitioners are women. It is reported that there has been already a compromise. I am, therefore, of the view that the petitioners are entitled to favourble interim order. 4. Under the circumstances, in the event of arrerst, the petitioners shall be released on bail subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. as under:- (i)that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii)that the person shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of this case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer; iii)that the person shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. Mr.Sikka, on instructions from ASI Om Parklash, has accepted the fact that compromise has indeed been effected. In the circumstances order dated 27.06.2011 is made absolute subject to the conditions envisaged in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE August 24, 2011 sunita