IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29735 of 2011 1.Shiv Shankar Gupta, Son of Nagina Gupta. Resident of Village Gahmar, P.S. Gahmar, District Ghazipur (U.P.). 2.Santosh Gupta @ Santosh Kumar Gupta, Son of Raghubansh Prasad. Resident of Village Magaraon, P.S. Rajpur, District Buxar. -------Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party -------------- 02/- 26.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the complainant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The two petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 323 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this complaint case with allegation of realizing substantial amount from the complainant in the garb of providing job at Malasiya, where he was sent but only on a Visa for a month, where he had to face some trouble, but anyhow returned only on subsequent payment of Rs. 10,000/-. Further, allegation is that though it was known to the complainant that Visa is valid for a limited period, but only on assurance of getting Visa for job, he left the country and now on demand no money is being returned. Submission is that neither the petitioners have any concerned with such affairs nor they did anything. On the contrary, learned counsel for the complainant tried to laid emphasis that offence of sale of complainant is also made out though no cognizance was taken. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bhabua, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1437 of 2010, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)