IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No.22290 of 2011 Date of decision December 1, 2011 Surjit Singh Sadiora ....... Petitioners Versus Union of India and another ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. H. S. Dhindsa, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the passport officer has not passed an order in the manner contemplated under Section 10 (2) of the Passport Act, 1967. The decision shall be taken by the Authority in the manner contemplated in the above Section within a period of four weeks. 2. The writ petition is disposed of dispensing with notice to the respondents at the stage of admission itself. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 1, 2011 archana