IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1309 of 2007 RAJESH KUMAR CHOUDHARY @ RAJU Versus SMT.NITU KUMARI ----------- 3 28/8/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court this civil revision application assailing the order dated 15.7.2006, which has already been confirmed again by the court below in course of examining the plea of the petitioner in a review application, is no longer maintainable in absence of copy of the order rejecting such review application. In that view of the matter, this Court would not find any merit in this application especially when counsel for the petitioner on being asked to produce a copy of the aforementioned order has said that copy of the same is not in his custody. That only shows that the petitioner is not prepared to press this application with all seriousness. That apart this court perusal of impugned order does not find any error therein as the court below has passed an order of interim maintenance under Section-24 of the Hindu 2 Marriage Act after considering the relevant materials. Accordingly, this Court does not find any merit in this application and the same is dismissed with a direction to the petitioner to pay the arrears and current amount of maintenance to the opposite party within one month of the receipt/production of a copy of this order failing which the opposite party would at liberty to take appropriate steps in accordance with law. ( Mihir Kumar Jha,J) Abhay Kumar