IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.496 OF 2003 APPEAL NO.496 OF 2003 APPEAL NO.496 OF 2003 Siddhu Tamanna Koli ...Appellant Versus Jaysingpur Municipal Council, Jaysingpur & Anr. ...Respondents Shri V.B.Rajure for the Appellant. Shri G.M.Savgare for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : JULY 06, 2007. : JULY 06, 2007. : JULY 06, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocates appearing for the Appellant and the Respondents. The Appellant is the original Plaintiff. A suit filed by the Appellant for permanent injunction against the Respondents for challenging the notice of demolition of the suit structure has been dismissed by the trial Court and the decree passed by the trial Court has been confirmed in the Appeal. 2. The Courts below have found that the structure was constructed without obtaining a valid building permission. No substantial question of law arises. However, in view of the peculiar facts of the case, sufficient time deserves to be granted to the Appellant to take out appropriate proceedings for regularisation of the possession and for regularisation of the suit ... 2 ... structure. 3. Hence, I pass the following order: (i) Second Appeal is dismissed with no orders as to costs. (ii) The parties will maintain status-quo as of today for a period of six months to enable the Appellant to take appropriate steps as indicated in this order. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE