IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.878 of 2009 JYOTI SINHA & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS For the Petitioners : M/S Tarakant Jha, Zainul Abedin For the State : AAG3 For the Commission : Sanjay Pandey ----------- MJC No.876 of 2009 NIBHA KUMARI & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS For the Petitioners : M/S Chitranjan Sinha Satish Chandra Mishra For the State : G.P. 13. For the Commission : Mr. Sanjay Pandey ----------- MJC No.874 of 2009 KUMARI SUNITA DAYAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS For the Petitoner : Mr. M/S T.K. Jha, Mr. Md. Waliur Rahman For the Commission : Mr. Sanjay Pandey For the State : SC 11. ----------- 2. 06.03.2009 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioners, for the State and for the Respondent-Commission. Learned counsel for the petitioners with reference to paragraph 1 at page 7 of the judgment and order dated 24.02.2009 submits that the observation that the vacancies referred to in the letter of the State dated 14.10.2008 were not fresh vacancies arising after the advertisement was an error of record. A bare perusal of Annexure-20 makes it apparent that it talks of vacancies arising out of retirement, resignation and promotions also. The only modification, therefore, required is to delete that part of the observation which states that the aforesaid vacancies arising from the said factors existed on the date of advertisement. The modification application is allowed and the order is modified to that extent only. AKS/- (Navin Sinha,J.)