Petitioner: BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHTISGARH AT BILASPUR. S.Nasir Ahmed, S/o Late Sattar Ahernd Aged about 55 years, Dy. Station Manager, Gevra Road RlyStation, SEC Rly Zone, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur. Vs. 1. Union of India, ThroughGeneral Manager, S.E.C. Railway Zone, Bilaspur Division, Biiaspur (CG) 2.Divisiona1 Railway Manager, SEC Railway Zoe, Bilaspur Divn, Bilaspur (CG) 3.Additional Divisional Railway Manager, SEC Ralway Zoe, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur [CG] 4.Senior Divisional Operation Mgr, SEC Railway Zone, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (CG) 5.Divisional Optrn. Mgr,[M} SEC Railway Zone, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur [CG] 6.Additional Area Manager, SEC Railway Zone, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur’[CG] 7.Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, SEC Railway Zone, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur [CG] WECENEMOPV @Maryl MM, Ma, Shawna Singhal m Solicitor Genera! of India High Calm of Chhattisgarh w REVIEW PETITION No. (“if «mm "rm aw W maw WWW {4% 31W pg,4 Divismn Bench: Hun. Shri Dhirendm Mishra & Hon. 5hri RN. Ghandrakar JJ. 44—7—2a0a (in Chamber):- The petitioner has filed ti‘is appiication and prayed for review of the order dated 16-6-2009 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No.87712008. It is sewed law that the High Court exercises power of review as a Court of plenary jurisdiction to prevent miscarriage of justice or to correct grave and paipable ermre committed by it. There are no definite iimits to the exercise of powers of review. The power of 'eview may be exercised on the discovery of new and important matter or evidence which after the exercise of due diligence was not within the knowiedge of the person seeking review or couid not be produced by him at the time when the order was made. it may be exercised where some mistake or error ar parent on the face of the record is found. However, the power is to be exercised within the limitation as provided under Section 114 read with Order 47 oi the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. After perueai of the order under review and originai record of W.P.(S) No.87712008, we are of the opiriiOh that no grounds, a3 stated above, are avaiiable to the petitioner against the impugned order and review application is liable to he dismissed. Accordingly, the review petition is hereby dismissed in liminei sw- Dhir‘endra Mishra Judge §€ am 3m Ban/e Sdl— Rangnath Chandrakar Judge earth tort? (WWW) u .m.wwww