IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50965 of 2007 Lala Singh @ Lala Singh Mukhia, son of Late Ramdas Singh, village Mther, PS Jehanabad (Karouna O.P.), Dist. Jehanabad – petitioner. Vs. 1) The State of Bihar, 2) Nirmala Devi, wife of Suresh Sao, Mohalla Kako Road, Jehanabad, PS and district Jehanabad – Opp. Parties. 22.2.2011 Despite notice issued by different procedures, no body appears on behalf of opposite party no.2 to oppose this application. Complaint Case No. 550 of 2005 was dismissed by order passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad after giving reasons for dismissing the case. Against the said order of dismissal, opposite party no.2 filed Cr. Revision No. 14/2006 / 6/2006 which was allowed by Additional District & Sessions Judge, FTC II, Jehanabad vide order, dated 27.7.2006. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner ought to have been heard in the matter since he is adversely affected by the order. I find substance in the submission of counsel for the petitioner. I accordingly quash the order, dated 27.7.2006 and the Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTC II, Jehanabad is directed to issue notice to the parties on receipt of a copy of this order and then pass appropriate orders within a period of six months on valid service of notice. This application is allowed. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order before the Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTC II, Jehanabad within four weeks. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)