IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 25TH JANUARY 2011 / 5TH MAGHA 1932 Crl.MC.No. 150 of 2011() ----------------------------- (C.C. NO. 195/2006 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, TIRUR, CRIME NO. 944/2005 OF TIRUR POLICE STATION) ...... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED ------------------------------- 1. ABDUL RAZAK, S/O.BAPPUTY, AGED 50 YEARS CHERAPARAMPIL VEEDU, THEKKAN KUTTOOR, VENGALOOR P.O., MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S):COMPLAINANT & STATE ------------------------------------------------- 1. ABDUL RAHMAN, S/O. ABDULLA, AGED 50 YEARS, CHERAPARAMPIL VEEDU, THEKKAN KUTTOOR, VENGALOOR P.O., MALAPPURAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADV. SMT.PREETHY R. NAIR R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.M.K.PUSHPALATHA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs THOMAS P JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------- Crl.M.C.No.150 of 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this 25th day of January, 2011 ORDER This petition is filed by the accused in C.C.No.195 of 2006 of the court of learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tirur to quash proceedings against him pursuant to the compromise allegedly entered with respondent No.1/de facto complainant. The case is that on 29.12.2005 petitioner wrongfully restrained the de facto complainant, criminally intimidated him to death and used obscene words against him. The Tirur police registered Crime No.944 of 2005 and after investigation submitted final report. Since then parties have settled the dispute. Petitioner and respondent No.1 have filed a joint statement signed by their respective counsel also stating that the dispute is settled outside court and respondent No.1 has no subsisting grievance. He also requested that the offences may be compounded. I have heard learned counsel for parties and learned Public Prosecutor. 2. It is seen from the joint statement signed by the parties and counter signed by their respective counsel that the dispute is settled between the parties. The offence is purely personal to and between petitioner and respondent No.1. Hence Crl.M.C.No.150 of 2011 -: 2 :- I am inclined to allow the petition. Resultantly this criminal miscellaneous case is allowed and the final report in Crime No.944 of 2005 of Tirur Police Station, cognizance taken thereon and all further proceedings in C.C.No.195 of 2006 of the court of learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tirur against the petitioner are quashed. (THOMAS P JOSEPH, JUDGE) Sbna/-