IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-1858 of 2010 Date of decision: April 06, 2010 Satish Kumar Petitioner Versus State of Haryana Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. A.K. Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.S. Mor, Sr. DAG Haryana for the respondent – State DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No. 153 dated 24.12.2009 registered under Sections 420/465/467/468/ 471/120-B IPC at Police Station Barada, District Ambala. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been compromised between the parties and the complainant who is brother of the present petitioner has also given an affidavit which is annexed as Annexure P-5 with the petition wherein he has specifically mentioned that the matter has been compromised. Moreover, the dispute with regard to share of Mamta Devi – sister of the petitioner has also been settled and she has also filed affidavits which are annexed as Annexures P-6 and P-7 with the petition wherein she has also stated that she does not want to take action in the said FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in compliance of the directions issued on 25.1.2010, the petitioner has joined the investigation. Crl. Misc. No. M-1858 of 2010 2 Learned counsel for the respondent-State has not controverted with regard to joining of investigation and other contentions raised by learned counsel for the petitioner. Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for further investigation, the interim order dated 25.1.2010 granting interim anticipatory bail is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. (DAYA CHAUDHARY) 06.04.2010 JUDGE reena