k. Cf- /'ZTB IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR CO WMT PETITIQH N0. / f. OF 2007 ^^ ^y^ s,-'''~\0''' ..•"" ^yx .,.-"^^^-"' ..'•''^A''\6.-; .,.'•'' ,^\^>''' ^"y r»y RESPOMDEMTS ! ^ LOKESH GARG, S/o Shri Madan Lal Gaig, Age about 37 Years, R/o Gax^ Traders, Bhatagaon Chowk, Ring Road No. 1, Raipur, Distt: Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary (Nodal Officer), Department OfPWD, (National Highway & Bridge Zone), D. K. S. Bhavan, RaipurfC.G.j -^. Executive Engineer, PWD Department, National Highway Diwision, Division No. 1, Penson Bada,Raipur(C.G.) 3. Sub Divisional OfEcer, National Highway Aufhority, Raipur(C.G.}. 4. Project Director, National Highway Aufhority Of India, (Mlnistiy of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways), House No. 40. Sector-2, Geetanjali Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) ^5. General Manager, B.O.T.-l, AU India National Highway Tribunal, Head-Office, New Delhi. ^6. Project Manager, M/s Raipur E^ress Ways Ltd. First Floor, Jay Prakash Bhawan, Telibandha Chowk, Raipur (C.G.) 7. Teaxa Leader, M/s Recardet S.A. M/s Feedback Turaki Ei^uieers, Pvt. Ltd. Bhavan No. R-ll, Avanti Vihar, Raipur (C.G.) ^. •'l' ^ . . l- WRIT PETmONW/A 226SBff OFflPME •• • CONSITITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A ; ^ '~^f. '. • WRIT OF NATURE OF CERTIORARI. XI-HC-78 Hl*1^11 Sb«<rai 3^ rfWM'li, ^WW, fsldl'y^ *»*»•*•*'» */* *»**y*^**^*^ 200 3ll^l i<a<») (li?ll^°l<ilil') sn^rwf^TO, trarsii^TstiHlqi ?RITCKgf?(T 311^1 25,1,2007 Shri Yogesh Pandey, Advocc Shri Vinay Pandey, P.L for Heard. Sy this petition the p.stiti< notice dated 7.12.2006 of Annexul whereby the petitioner has b< unauthorized constr'uc-tion over tH 7 days. The petitioner has been on 19.12.2006 at 3.00 p.m. in tt^ hearing. Ledrned counsel for thel receiving the sald notice the pf 19.12.2006, however, the sam^ respondents we. likely to disp| premises. He further submits with a direction to the concernedl jte for the petitioner. he Stdte. (ner' has questioned the impu9ned 'e P-10 issued by respondent No.2 ;en calied upon to remove his e National Highway No.006 within ^irther directed to remain present e office of respondent No.2 for thilst of Annexure P-11 in accordancel T-t.VrcM^t»wn ns^c^,, the petitioner should no' ft^' notice of Annexure P-10 dated 71 the counsel for the Stdte. 'oi'iiFci'fl-t *<it«-iT^te^<Rfwi< ^isri^rsn^r petitioner submits that after ^titioner submitted his reply on has not been considered and >ssess the petitioner from the the petition may be disposed of authorities to consider the repiy with law and till decision of the be dispossessed in pursuance of .12.2006, which is not opposed by P.T.O. XI-HC-78 Hl*TcTT»>*1|ch 3^'Hnqrcra', eiTntf'is, Riciitiy ***»**(l»****'**»^«»»»/t*, /"^T 200 Sii^i i^qi (licii^'s<<{*r) 3I1^T?)TR-fi* (PTT 3TR?T ^IfRi ^ TOIRKtriScTSfI^T In view of the above sul parties, this petition is disposed that they shall consider the repl after affording an opportunity further directed that till approj of Annexure P-11, the petitioner premises. The petition isaccordingly Consequentiy, M.W.P. N0.1 <tii<<fci<fl-i iiHflTfftet^-tRiwK. ^sri^n'sn^r imission made by counsel for the of with a direction to respondents of Annexure P-11 on its own merit |f hearing to the petitioner. It is riate ordar is passed on the reply shali not be dispossessed from the disposed of. 113/07 also stands disposed of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O;