IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.11768 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 07, 2010. The Super Cooperative Transport Society Ltd. and another .....Petitioners versus The Transport Commissioner, Haryana-cum-Chairman, Regional Transport Authority, Gurgaon and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Lekh Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.R.D.Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to seek any counter-reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioners are Cooperative Transport Societies. They are permit holders to ply buses from Gurgaon to Ghata route which was further extended upto old Faridabad. Their grievance is that respondent No.3-Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Gurgaon and Member, C.W.P.No .11768 of 2010 2 Regional Transport Authority, Gurgaon is not framing the regular time- table on Gurgaon to Ghata route (extended upto old Faridabad) so as to enable the petitioners to ply their buses as per the prescribed time-table. The petitioners have further averred that as a result of non-prescription of the time table, Haryana Roadways, who is a competitor of the petitioners, is getting undue advantage. It is also their case that despite representations dated 2.3.2005 and 5.3.2009 (Annexures P-3 & P-4), followed by a legal notice dated 16.3.2009 (Annexure P-5) as well as yet another representation dated 8.6.2009 (Annexure P-6), no action has been taken by respondent No.3 so far. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider the above-noticed grievance of the petitioners and take necessary steps regarding framing of the regular time-table within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 07, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE