^ INTHEHIGH COUKT OF 01H.ATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petitioti No.^2f/20Q2 FETmO^JER fal Prqapati, ^(^^v~^t'^/oLeteSbriJSvis:beSifra}aDa^ \f'^-'^ ^-\ ^ Aged about 55 yeais, worldng as <'...-"^ i-v-' ^- Deputy Rar^er, Kashtagar Pithora, ' '..•~' ^^'l£i°y Forest CivisiQii Mahasainund, ,.•: ^',^^~ p^ ^ .-' <-'.,E^', '<<s°^:'" ^s- % &»•- RKPONDENT5 R/o Pithora, Mahasamund (C.G.) - Versus- State of Chhattisgarh. Thi'ougtiSixi'etary, Depaitaient Of Forest, Mantfalaya, Shastri Chowk, Raipur(CG.) Z ChiefCanse'rratca-ofForest, Fafadeeh Chowl^ Raipur(CG.). 3. Di'viBionfll Farest Qfficei-, Mahasamud (CG.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF-THE CONSTITUTION OF INDLA. FOR ISSUANCE OFA WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC.OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IH THE MATTER. T^f^t.^1^. ^X. ^t^f^wf.^,t~il!^wt~. w ^^f^^/\/r^''^r ^"^-^i-J r^Lw^J'~-^-^'L -j'J^^'^ XI-HC-22 sn^i'w tW^i s^W ihiro^lfOTi -r C3^ 's^'^l'iiy^^.a'ifiy'iio, i««ti'u^<, - sv^C'^^ _. ,.,: ^. ; {JD. •K N0, \^^ / 2^53V_- ^.^.^...........^......^.^ >200 • HWWI 9lW* •siI^lWlWaftg 09/12/2002 Shri Vinay Paadey, Shri Sanjay K. Agarwal, Heard. coun^el for the petitioner. Ipy.A.G. for the State. for promotion to the post of\ petitioner, he has passed therefore he is quaKfied for be| ^i^T^*ftTt ^f*l<lT'^ f«^•rf^^T< ^aiNHsii^r The grievauce offEie petit^oner is iton-consideration ofhis claiin Forest Ranger. , Accordiag to tfae ) ttie departmentalj examiaation and ing considered. It is submitled fhat without consideruig his case ^oine persons who are jtttuor to him, Iiave beeu promoted to ttie po^t ofForest Ranger. Benig aggrieved fhcrewith, thc pctitioncrSubnu|UEd a rcprcscnt^tion on 18/02/2002, I • ;: • 1 : <,'' : ' but that lias iiot bccn CQnsidcntd. >nelr Coiinsel for the petitione no.2 Chief Conservator of consider his representation and In view ofithe limited hearuig, ftie Court feels that fl keepiag fbis writipetition pendi the admission stage by a prays for a directipii to respondent 11'orest, Fafadeeh Chbwk, Raipur to consider bis case for proaiotioiL. i(ature of prayer niade at tbe ttme |of |o iiseful ^urpose ^would be serwed ili idjng as fhe same caa be disposed of at si|itabte direetion fp respoiideiit nQ;2 ^'sas.- /. *-' \ - . ,' i '-^ - : : / ' .-!•' [^:^g^^':,'i^i •l:'^ .^iJt XI-HC-22 sn^i ST l<(-li?b Slgn WRN?'gfCT, ^:'^^ •g3? •^IPIRPT, •®gtH5S,ft<ii*ii< A^^^^ a>*ii<o '! ;:•;•.,/., WWII •9^*ll<:b an^Tteirat^tof Accordingly, CIiief Conservato^- consider petitioner's represent^ thereon ia accordance with law three aionths from. fhe date ofc pf Forest - respondent no.2 to ktion aad pass appropriate oiders <j>n its own inerits within the period of timmunication/reGeipt ofthe order of this Court. It is laadeclear t}iat fhe Court is notexpressiag any of ffae petiti.oner's elaiin wtiich stricfly on its own merits. t:tions aad observations ftie petition opinion on ftie merits or entifletaent has to be decided by fhe Authori-ty With the above dire< stands disposed of. Certifled eopy as per *i<ii?i<il-< wrejf4 ftlz> <f»i^K ^ SlPdff SII^T rules. Sd/- P.C NAIK Judge -O ^ i^\3"& ^ [^^t&^ ^ 11