1 CRA-555.09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.555 OF 2009 Pragatibai Ghanshyam Bagwe .... Applicant Vs. Satnam Singh Banta Singh Khokar .... Respondent Shri Rajesh Parab for the Applicant. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JULY 21, 2010 P.C: The applicant-landlady has filed this revision application questioning the concurrent findings of both the learned Judge of the Small Causes Court and the Appellate Bench of the said Court whereby they have held that the respondent had proved that he was a tenant in respect of the suit premises. The respondent claimed that he had been inducted in the premises in the year 1975 on a monthly rent of Rs.18/- and deposit of Rs.5000/-. According to the applicant, the respondent was accommodated only for 20-30 days. The applicant, however, did not take any step to have the respondent 2 CRA-555.09 evicted after the completion of those 20-30 days. In 1984 the applicant seems to have indulged in some highhanded action for evicting the respondent which led to filing of proceedings under Section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Thereafter, the applicant filed a suit bearing No.3781 of 1990 in the City Civil Court. But this suit was not prosecuted to its logical end. Ultimately, in 1995 the tenant filed a suit for declaration that he was the tenant. The facts are so glaring that a further comment is not necessary. The Courts below have rightly held that no person in Mumbai would suffer a totally unknown stranger on his property for such a long period gratuitously. The findings cannot be faulted. The revision application is, therefore, rejected. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)