IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.592 of 2008 SONI KUMARI . Versus THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,SIWAN& . ----------- 2. 1.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance is of non-consideration for appointment on the post of Secretary, Gram Kachahari, despite having higher marks and placed accordingly in the panel when persons with lesser marks and lower merit position in the panel have been appointed. The writ petition is not specific with regard to the marks of the petitioner position in the merit panel and the names of those alleged to be below the petitioner with lesser marks and appointed. If the petitioner has filed a representation before the District Magistrate and supplements the same with adequate details of her marks and merit position in the panel inclusive of the details of those she claims have been wrongly appointed discriminating against her, only in that event is the District Magistrate required to decide the representation after hearing all concerned, by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)