IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN THURSDAY, THE 31ST JULY 2008 / 9TH SRAVANA 1930 RP.No. 792 of 2008 IN UN NUMBERED MFA. OF 2002 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PETITIONER/ APPELLANT: -------------------------------------- CHELLAPPAN, S/O.KESAVAN THUNDI VEEDU, SURESH BHAVANAM PALLICKAL EAST, THEKKEKKARA, KURATHIAD, MAVELIKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.S.K.BALACHANDRAN. RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. SIVANKUTTY, S/O.KANNAN, PUMATHARAYIL HOUSE, THAZHAKKARA VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA. 2. MANAGING PARTNER, UDAYA DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE, NEAR GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL, THAZHAKKARA, MAVELIKKARA. 3. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., BRANCH NO.2, ENSIGN BUILDING, JOS JUNCTION., M.G.ROAD, COCHIN-682 018. BY THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/07/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. J.B.KOSHY & V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. -------------------------------------- R.P.No.792 OF 2008 in Unnumbered M.F.A of 2002 and C.M.Appl.No.1585 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated 31st July, 2008 ORDER Koshy,J . We see no ground to pass orders in the review petition as appeal will not lie in a matter settled in Lok Adalath. If Lok Adalath settlement is not proper, it is for the appellant to challenge the same in a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. But, we are not looking into that aspect in this review petition. Apart from the above, this review petition was filed with a delay condonation petition for condoning the long delay of 1702 days. No satisfactory reasons are stated for condoning the long delay. Both delay condonation petition and the review petition are dismissed. J.B.KOSHY JUDGE V.K.MOHANAN JUDGE tks