IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32719 of 2010 Saurabh Kumar Jaiswal @ Saurabh Jaiswal @ Chintu Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ---------------------------------- 06. 26.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Alleged torture is for demand of dowry, that is denied on the ground that earlier to filing of this Complaint case, a divorce case was filed on behalf of the husband as wife was not willing to reside with the husband rather was not allowing to have matrimonial relation and only to create a defence, this Complaint Case is lodged basing which refusal of anticipatory bail is not justified. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas (Sasaram) in connection with Complaint Case No.1220 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)