HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 25th January, 2011 1st Bail Application No. 51 of 2011 Order on the bail application of the accused. Noor Hasan @ Noora S/o Kalu ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party In Case Crime No. 351 of 2010 U/s 457, 380 and 411 I.P.C. Police Station Patel Nagar District Dehradun Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Heard Shri K.S. Verma, the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Nandan Arya, the learned A.G.A. for the State. Heard on urgency application. The urgency application No. 338 of 2011 is allowed. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that the recovery of kangan and two rings were made from the possession of the applicant after two months. The learned counsel further submitted that the applicant is in jail since 30/11/2010. On the other hand, the leaned A.G.A. submitted that the recovery was identified by the complainant. Without commenting any further on the merits of the case, this court is of the opinion that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail at this stage. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 351 of 2010, U/s 457, 380, 411 I.P.C, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (V.K. Bist, J.) Vacation Judge Dated 25.01.2011 Shiv 2