IN THE HIGH COUR T OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24778 of 2011 Chandra Shekhar Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 28.09.2011 By the impugned criminal miscellaneous the learned counsel for the petitioner sought for quashing of the order dated 06.06.2011 passed by Sri Vikram Singh, A.D.J., F.T.C.-III, Sheikhpura in Sessions Trial No.937 of 2005 whereby and where under the learned lower court decline to admit the document taking aid of Section 294 of the Cr.P.C. The prime criteria for application of Section 294 of the Cr.P.C. happens to be with regard to admission of genuineness of the document by the adversary. The document may be brought up on record through the different methods so prescribed under the Evidence Act, but so far application of Section 294 of the Cr.P.C. is concerned, it could come into play only after having the genuineness of the document admitted by the adversary. The order impugned suggests that the adversary has not accepted / admitted the genuineness of the document. As such certainly there can’t be application of Section 294 of the Cr.P.C. Therefore, the petition in its present form appears to be misconceived and is, accordingly, rejected. However, the petitioner will be at liberty to bring documents on record by adopting different procedure as prescribed under the Evidence Act. PN (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)