-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.249 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.249 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.249 OF 2008 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.1225 OF 2004 APPEAL NO.1225 OF 2004 APPEAL NO.1225 OF 2004 Kusum Dagadu Bhosale & Ors. ...Applicants vs. Mohan Balwant Bhosale & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Nitin Mulye h/f Mr.G.S.Godbole for the Applicants Mr.Kapadnis for Respondent Nos.3 to 9. Mr.M.B.Kale h/f Mr.U.B.Nighot for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.Ashok Tanjane for Respondent Nos.12(i) to 12(iii). CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : FEBRUARY 7, 2008 : FEBRUARY 7, 2008 : FEBRUARY 7, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates for the parties. Perused the certificate dated 6th February 2008 issued by the Advocate representing the Respondent Nos.12(i) to 12(iii). I have perused the Affidavit of the next friend of Respondent Nos.12(ii) and 12(iii). 2. In view of what is stated in the certificate and the Affidavit, compromise appears to be in the interest of the minors. Hence, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE