IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46270 of 2008 AMRENDRA YADAV … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri Sunil Kr. Pathak For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta,APP ----------- 2. 17.12.2008 Heard. The case is under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and it relates to snatching of the motorcycle of the informant at the point of gun. The informant has stated that he identified the two out of the four miscreants and has named the present petitioner with specific manner as in what amount he identified the petitioner. It is true that the petitioner has remained in custody for about a year and that the F.I.R. was lodged after 24 hours. It is true that there is a delay in lodging of the F.I.R. and it is also true that the petitioner is in custody for about a year but considering the specific manner in which the petitioner was identified while committing the offence, I am not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)