-'-i. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) M.C.C. N0. lZ7 / 2011 APPELLANT RESPONDENTS M/s. Akash Wires VERSUS Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. 85 another APPLICATION FOR RESTQRATION OF M.A. N0. 707/2006 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PRQSECUTION A^ INTHE MATTER QF: M/S AKASHWIRES 14-B, NEW INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, ^ RA.WABHATA. RAIPUR (C.G.) VERSUS TAm^^'eJ .QJL.' ^'€Ly fe'LI ^CwJiyfi o>cje^_cl!r.. oi|t>2>|U- ...APPELLANT ; MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTIQN COMPANY LIMITED, . CENTRAL PURCHASE AGBNCY, PRAKASHGAD, 1st FLOOR, PLOTNO. G-9, BANDRA (EAST), MUMBAI-400561 . CHHATTISCxARH INDUSTRIAL FACILITATION COUNCIL OLD ADDRESS: SONAKHAN BHAVAN;,,.KING ROAD, RA UR(C.G.) NEW AnDRESS:.DIREGTORAfE OF INDUSTRIES NBAR L.I.G. BUILDING. PAiTORI. RAIPUR (0.0.1 ; ...RESPQNDENTS s>\^ ^ ^ c ! •^ •^ ^•M..^ 1; ^,.^^"^ 3!^^^ ^m^ 7(J ^w^\\\ '^rv HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BJLASPUR CORAM: Hon'bte Shri l.M. Quddusi, J. & Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. APPLICANT RESPONDENTS IVI.C.C.fPmNo.814of2011 M/s Akash Wire^. Versus Maharashtra State Electricity Djstribution Company Ltd. & another. Appearance: Shri Sumesh Bajaj, eounsel for tho applicant. ORAL ORDER (01/03/2011) Foilowing ora! ordsr of the Court was passed by I. !VI. Quddusl. J. This is an appjication for restoration of M.A. No. 707/2006 which was dismissed for want of prosecution by this Court on 28/02/2011. Application for exemption from fjling certified copy is allowed. Office has raised objection that the affidavit has not been fi!ed by the duly authorized agent. Learned counsel has fited Vakatatnama and as such he is duly authorized by the appellant and he cannot be treated as iesser than duiy authorized agent of the appellant. The deponent Shri LJissh Shrivastava is Clerk attached to the counsel as such hjs affidavit is taken as true as mentioned duly authorized by the appellant. Moreover learned counsel appearing for the party can authorize on behalf of the party in the present facts and cjrcumstances therefore the offlce objection js over ruled. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned jn the appllcation we are satisfied that the applicant has been able to explain the non-appearance. Accordingiy, the M.C.C. is allowed. M.A. No. 707/2006 is restored to its original number subject to correction of details of the parties in the instant M.C.C. by iearned counse! for the applicant (M/s Akash Wires). LJst the case after one week. u ^ Sd/- I.M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge