1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2644 OF 2008 Usha Dhiraj Varia ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. Amarendra Mishra for the Petitioner Mrs. A.S Pai, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 2009 P.C.:- The petitioner seeks the following reliefs from this Court:- “(a) (That) Record and proceedings in C.C. No. 1255/PW/09 pending in file of Ld. Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 24th Court, Mumbai, be called upon (sic). (b) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or certiorari or any other appropriate writ thereby directing the Respondent No. 1 to conduct further and proper investigation into the allegation of the Petitioner as stated in Crime No. 358/06 by way of seizure of alleged forged document as mentioned in letter dt. 25/3/08 at Exhibit “G” and by recording statements of relevant witness thereto and 2 submit a supplementary charge-sheet before the Ld. Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 24th Court, Borivali in the file of C.C. No. 1255/PW/07. (c) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 1 to conduct the further investigation into the said Crime No. 358/06 under the supervision of the Respondent No. 2 and if required the Respondent No. 2 be directed that the investigation be handed over to other prudent officer to meet the ends of justice. (d) (That) pending the hearing and final disposal of the present petition, the Respondent No. 1 be directed to investigate into the author (sic) of the said forged document as mentioned in letter dated 25/3/08 at Exhibit “G” and persons associated with the Accused in preparing the same and further to submit the action taken report before this Hon'ble Court. (e) (That) pending the hearing and final disposal of the present petition, the proceeding in C.C. No. 1255/PW/07 pending before Ld. Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 24th court, Borivali, Mumbai be stayed. (f) (That) ad-interim and/or interim relief in terms of prayer clause (d) and (e) be granted. (g) (That) any other and further order be passed in favour of the Petitioner.” 2. The matter is pending before the trial Court, and we are told by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the charge-sheet had been filed on 27th September, 2006. So far, the charge has not been 3 framed. Whatever remedies the petitioner wants can be sought from the learned trial Court while the charge is being framed. Without approaching the trial Court, we do not think that the petitioner's Writ Petition succeeds. The petition is accordingly dismissed. BILAL NAZKI, J. ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.