1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.M.YUSUF EQBAL, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.JYOTHIMANI W.A.(MD).No. 287 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2011 Jairams Educational Trust, rep.by its Chairman, No.67, Pradhakshnam Road, Karur. : Appellant/Petitioner Vs. The Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, National Council for Teachers Education, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Bangalore-31. : Respondent/Respondent PRAYER: Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order of the learned Single Judge, dated 18.10.2010, made in W.P.(MD)No.4163 of 2010. To issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records on the file of the respondent pertaining to its order bearing No.F.SRO/NCTE/2008-09/1144 dated 08.04.2009 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to process the petitioner's application and grant recognition for starting B.Ed Course from the academic year 2009-2010. For Appellant : Mr.T.Jeen Joseph For Respondent : Mr.A.Sivaji JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was delivered BY The Hon'ble The CHIEF JUSTICE] Heard the counsel for the petitioner/appellant and perused the impugned order passed by the learned single Judge. 2.The petitioner/appellant made necessary application seeking permission to start a B.Ed. College and the same was processed by the respondent. By a letter dated 30.10.2008, pointing out some defects and deficiencies, including non-furnishing of building completion certificate from Government Authorities and no encumbrance certificate and an affidavit relating to details of land possessed, etc., was sent to the petitioner/appellant with a direction to remove all the deficiencies but, the letter sent to the petitioner/appellant was returned with an endorsement "No such Addressee" and consequently the application was closed by the respondent. The said order was challenged in the writ petition on the ground that several letters were sent by the petitioner/appellant informing that all deficiencies have been complied with and hence the application ought not to have been closed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3.In the background of these facts, we do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge. This writ appeal is dismissed. It is made clear that the dismissal of the writ petition will not come in the way of the petitioner in making fresh application. No costs. Connected M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2011 is also dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The Regional Director, Southern Regional Committee, National Council for Teachers Education, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Bangalore-31. +1CC TO MR.A.SIVAJI, ADVOCATE SR.24369 gb SR : 02.08.2011 : 2p/3c JUDGMENT IN W.A.(MD)No.287/2011 and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2011 Dated:25.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/