1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No.3059/2007 Smt. Nilprabha w/o Dadaji Shende Vs. The State of Mah. and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE, J. DATED : 17/09/2008. Heard Mr. Saboo, learned counsel for the petitioner. The main grievance made in the application filed by the petitioner is that the application made by the petitioner for correction of revenue map in the year 1995 has not yet been decided and unless that application is decided, the lower authorities ought not to have passed the impugned orders. All the three authorities have concurrently held against the petitioner. The petitioner has not produced on record copy of the sale deed by which the petitioner claims that he has purchased the property in respect of which the impugned orders have been passed. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned orders. If the petitioner was aggrieved by the refusal of the authorities to decide the application filed in the year 1995, the petitioner ought to have taken steps to get the decision at the earliest at appropriate time. I find no merit in the petition. Therefore, the petition is rejected. JUDGE Ambulkar. 2