cilc‘p IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH Writ Petition AT BILASPUR No. ....’.%i2’:..2003 / PETITIONERS 1. Virendra Kumar Pal Aged about 43 years S/o Antu Prasad Pal, R/o Village Sitapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) Ramanarayan Singh Gautam S/o Kaushal Singh Gautam Aged about 54 years, R/o Karabel Mainpat, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) Shiwdhar Ojha Aged about 4O years S/o R.P. Ojha, R/o Kedarpur New Matkhi Road, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) Ashok Kumar Rai Aged about 39 years S/o Ramadhar Rai, R/o Village Sitapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) Dr. Anjani Kumar Tripathi Aged about 51 years S/o R.B.‘ Tripathi, R/o Village Sitapur, Distt. Surguja '(C.G.) Laxman Singh :Chauhan Aged about 42 jyears S/o Ram Ekbal Singh, R/ o Village Sitapur, y Distt. Surguja ca) A ' ( VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. Staterof Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Triable Welfare Department D‘K.S‘ Bhawan, Raipur. The Commissioner, Trible Welfare Department, Raipur Asst. Director, Trible Welfare Department, Ambikapur Asst. Commissioner, Trible Welfare Department, Ambikapur 5. Divisional Asst. Commissioner, Trible Welfare Department, Bilaspur 6. Block Education Officer, Sitapur, Distt. Surguja 7. Block Education Officer, Mainpat, Distt. urgujaJ/f WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI~HC-22 ‘ 26g452603 ' Shh . Manon} v . Parangapa, . \ CGunsel f0? the petmonei‘S‘ . . 11gh,G0VL. Advccate. Stat€ by Shri Ranbir S Heard Learned counSei for the petitioner?) Submitted that the p€tition€rs are aggrieved by the madman of :he reepondente whereby they are Withhelding' the twe advance meremente of ihe petitioners. Having considered Qiécts and Circumetances of the case aim material on reCOIjkL in the 0131111011 of this Ceurt, ends of justice will serve of this erder to the compet fmm today and on such e0mpetem autherity sh$l from the date of production : ', / if a direction iS given to the petiiioner t0 make a deiaiieti repreeentation a10i1g4x%7it}1 a copy Em authority within 7f1ftee11 clays l repregentation being flied the decide the same by passing a reeeoned Order in accordar ce with law within two menths pf repreeentatien. If arty adverse éi‘dei‘ 1e passed and the petitioney thefeb‘y feels aggrieVed, he may flie the petition afresi‘g challenging the said ordeix It is pas not expreseed any opinion on made dear that this Ceurt f the merits of the ease ‘ With the aforesaid 01 iciisposed of. Consequently, M.W.Pt iies. of. Certified cap}? ae per i‘ K )servatione’ this petition etands and LA, if any, stand dislaoeeci ’x Sdl— Fakhruddin Judge