THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO.538 OF 2009 13th December, 2010. Between: MOHD.ZAKIR AHMED .. PETITIONER AND THE COMMISSIONER OF BHAINSA MUNICIPALITY, ADILABAD AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO.538 OF 2009 O R D E R: (PER THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU) The petitioner is aggrieved of the allotment of work to respondents 4 and 5 on nomination basis keeping in view their past performance. Responding thereto it is averred by the respondents in the counter that the petitioner is also a contractor who was registered just before the allotment and he is yet to gain experience in that field. It is further stated that the work allotted to respondents 4 and 5 was on the basis of their performance and most of it is already completed, therefore, interference is uncalled for. Dismissed. Learned counsel for respondents 4 and 5 seeks a direction for payment of bills, that has to be strictly in accordance with rules/law. (VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR,J) (NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ) 13th December, 2010. Cc in three days. Nagesh babu THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO.538 OF 2009 O R D E R: (PER THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU) 13th DECEMBER, 2010.