IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1896 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.576 OF 2000 Shashiprabha Manohar Rawate ...Plaintiff v/s. Arvind K. Rawte & anr. ...Defendants ... Mr.V.Ramkrishnan for the Plaintiff. Mr.S.D.Mogre for the Defendant No.1. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 23RD NOVEMBER,2006 P.C.: The only reason that has been given is that the lawyer was professionally engaged somewhere on that date. If that was so it was the duty of the lawyer to make alternate arrangement. The lawyer could not ignore the court where his matter was listed. Motion is, therefore, disposed of. ...