1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Pursis St. No.1229/2011 and APPR No.38/2011 in CRA No. 110/2010 Raju Sadashiv Yerme Vs. Suraj Raju Yerme Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. CORAM: U.V. BAKRE, J. DATE : 08/07/2011 Heard Mrs. S. V. Dhawas, learned counsel for the applicant. It is seen from the records that both parties have no objection for DNA test being performed in order to find out the paternity of the child. However, the mother and guardian of non- applicant had shown her inability to share the expenditure for DNA test on the ground that she is poor and cannot afford the same. Looking at the circumstances of the case and statement made by the non-applicant, this Court, therefore, asked the learned Advocate for the applicant whether the applicant is willing to pay the entire charges. 2 The learned Advocate Mrs. Dhawas has stated that the applicant is ready and willing to incur the entire expenses. In view of the above, the request for DNA test is allowed, which shall be carried out at the entire costs and expenses of the applicant. The applicant wants two weeks' time to deposit entire amount. Time granted as prayed for. Stand over to 22/7/2011. JUDGE Ambulkar.