I t 37. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV.25612010 RAMESH CHANDER VERMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nanda with Ms. Rachna Saxena, Advs. . VCTSUS SHIV SHANKAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar GuPta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL ORDER % 09.11-.20L0 Caveat No.289/2010 Since counsel for the caveator has appeared, .notice to the caveator is dispensed with. The caveat stands disposed of. QM No.19710 ^0L0 (exemptionl Exemption as prayed for is allowed subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. RC.REV. 2s6l2010 & CM L9709/2010 After some arguments counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is not pressing the petition on merits and prays that petitioner may be given some time to vacate the premises in question. RC.REV.256t20t0 page 1 of 2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified The respondent is present in person. Under the instructions from the respondent, th9 counsel for the respondent states that the respondent has no objection in granting time to the petitioner up to 30.04.20L2 and the respondent will not execute the eviction order till then. In view of above statement given by the counsel for parties the present petition and pending application stand disposed of as not pressed. The petitioner is granted time till 30.04.2012 to vacate the premises in question subject to filing of usual undertaking by the petitioner within two weeks with a copy to the respondent. Renotify on 29.L1.20.10. In the meanwhile, the respondent shall not execute the eviction order till the next' date of hearing. The parties to appear in person'on the next ff date. NOVEMBER 09,2O1O srb $",ry VEENA BIRBAL, J RC.REV. 256t20t0 page 2 of 2