:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4501 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4501 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4501 OF 2008 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO.837 OF 200 FIRST APPEAL NO.837 OF 200 FIRST APPEAL NO.837 OF 2001 Bhullar Yadav ...Applicant. v. The B.M.C. ...Respondents. Mr.D.R.Shah , adv. for the Applicant. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 12th September, 2008. DATE: 12th September, 2008. DATE: 12th September, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. 2. The applicant had filed First Appeal No.837 of 2001. That appeal was rejected on 16-10-2004 by the Additional Registrar on the ground that office objections were not removed. This application is filed on 31st July, 2008 to set aside the order of the Registrar about dismissal for non removal of the office objections. In paragraph 5 of the application, which is on affidavit, it is stated that office objections were noticed by the clerk of the advocate on 21-7-2008. This only indicates that from the year 2001 to July, 2008, the applicant and the advocate were totally negligent in the matter and they had not even bothered to see whether there were any office objections and whether they were removed or not. It appears that certified copy of the :2: impugned judgment was not filed alongwith the appeal. Taking into consideration these circumstances and the conduct of the applicant, I see no justification to allow this application. 3. Application stands rejected. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)