Crl.Misc. No.M-37991 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc. No.M-37991 of 2010 Date of decision: 22.02.2011 Pooja Rani and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY. PRESENT: Mr. Nandan Jindal Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG, Punjab. Mr.Hemant Bassi, Advocate for UT, Chandigarh. **** ORDER The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed by the petitioners for issuance of direction to respondent Nos. 1 to 6 not to interfere in the peaceful married life of the petitioners at the instance of respondents No.7 to 9. Notice of motion was issued on 23.12.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have solemnized the marriage contrary to the wishes of respondents No.7 to 9 and are being given threats at the instsance of respondents No.7 to 9. Mr.Dhuriwala, learned State counsel submits that no complaint has been received by the local police. Similarly, Mr.Bassi, learned counsel for UT, on instructions from SI Jagdish Chander PS 36, submits that a complaint was given by petitioner No.1 and respondent No.8 was called with regard to that complaint wherein, he has stated that no such threat was given and he has Crl.Misc. No.M-37991 of 2010 2 no objection with regard to marriage of the petitioners. Respondent No.8 is brother of petitioner No.1 who has stated before the police that he as well as his family members have no objection with regard to the marriage of the petitioners and they have not given any threat to the petitioners. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the parties, no direction is required in the present petition as respondents No.7 to 9 have no objection with the marriage of the petitioners and have given an undertaking not to give any threat to the petitioners. Dismissed as having become infructuous. (DAYA CHAUDHARY) Feb.22, 2011. JUDGE Seema-II