tt' S S T- -j. 1-1 n_ o ~s o- n m Q- cn Q -5 -i- ~h s -+> D nw 7K .-s D f*.^' :fv<~ \^sfo. l-,'"-,, ', ^v (^l :-^> ^ OJ -j S» -3 tft o- y.- 6 "> Q i3-}• °' ^' tn n •+ —4- 0 ~3 ui' °. -+ i3 a -<- n ci~s ^'""^ 'kuu^' "^L D -h r> ~s ""s O 3- .{, ~-W9Sr A A. ~art '••: '•»•„'• "<c '••. ^ '\ •^^^\. •^^. .^•^ '•^.^^- '"<^^ ^;^s'':.. '^"•^' u> 10 ro tftui (/> n3- o us c: •D m zm \ ^ ? 5. §. ~s v •§ -5 °- +>. >0_ 3- ui e> ro n3- ""s ~s tft ?' § < Cl T^ "^ ~^ -^ ^f ;^ x c>ao o '~~» iftiS "^WMt*' WRIT PCTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION_OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BILASPUR SiNGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATiSH K. AGNIHOTRi. J. Petitioner WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.977 OF_ Chatrapal Singh Kanwar s. ""'- versus Respondents : Sfate of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. Amit Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Deepaii Pandey, Pane! Law/yer for the State/ respondents. ORDER (Passed on 20tfl Day of February, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the pelftionersubmits that the petitioner is working as Assistant Teacher in Government Primary Schooi, Mudiyanar, District Korba. The petitioner has obtained B.Ed. Examinaton certifroate on 21-1-1993. at his own expenses. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the question invoh/ed herein as to whether the teacher, who obtained B.Ed. Examination certiflcate at his own expenses, is entitled to two advance incremente. 3. According to learnsd counsel appearing for fte petitioner, the petltioner is entitied to two advance increments in vlew of She decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kuinar Bharadwaj vs. Muniospal Coiporatmn, Durg and another, 'wheram it has been he!d 2 that the teachers, having obtained B.Ed., M.Ed., B.T.I. CerWicates, at their own expenses, are covered by the cireular dated 24-12-1W8 issued by the State Government of Madhya Pradesh. 4. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner furtter submits that the facts and question of law invoived in the present case are squareiy covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj vs. MuniclpalCoiporation, Durg and (supra), to which iearned counsel appearing for the State/resoondents fairiv concedes and aarees with the averments made by iearned counseS appearing for the petltioner. 5. Accordingiy, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the decision ofthis Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwal vs. MunicipaS Coiporati'on, Duiy and another (supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whefter the petitioner has acquired B.Ed. Certificats at his own expenses as per the circuiars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and furthsr whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihntri Judge 2006 (II) MPJR-CQ 98 Gopal