:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2277 OF 2006 Shri Sunil Ambadas Kamod ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents Mr. D.B. Sawant for petitoner. Mr. A.H. Palekar, AGP for State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B.H. B.H. B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. MARLAPALLE, J. MARLAPALLE, J. Date Date Date : : : August 7, 2006. August 7, 2006. August 7, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned AGP for the State. 2. Admittedly, against the dismissal of the appeal filed under Section 137 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 by respondent no.2, the petitioner has filed a Revision Application before the State Government on or about 24/1/2006 and it is alleged by the petitioner that neither the Revision Application nor the Stay Petition has been decided by the State Government during the last about seven months or so. :2: 3. Mr. Palekar, the learned AGP, on instructions, states that the pending revision application will be decided within eight weeks on its own merits. 4. The undertaking is hereby accepted and it is directed that the pending revision application shall be heard and decided within a period of eight weeks by the competent authority. 5. Petition disposed off accordingly. 6. Writ to go forthwith. (B.H. (B.H. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) Marlapalle,J.) Marlapalle,J.)