1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2385/2011 (LATE NARAYANRAO KHANDEBHARAD INSTITUTE VERSUS NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.N. Ghuge, counsel for the petitioner. Shri C.S. Kaptan, counsel for the R-1 & 2. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 12 , 2011 . It appears that the National Council for Teacher Education has rightly rejected the application of the petitioner for grant of permission to start M.Ed. Course in the college run by the petitioner-Society, as the requirement under Clauses 8(3) and 8(4) of the National Council for Teacher Education Regulation, 2009 were not complied with. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would file a fresh application as, in any case, now the petitioner has more than three years’ experience and the requirement of Clause 8(3) would be complied while making a fresh application. In regard to the requirement of Clause 8(4), the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would do the needful and comply accordingly. In case, the petitioner files a fresh application, the respondent-National Council for Teacher Education is directed to decide the same as early as possible and in accordance with law. 2 The writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE APTE