IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 15125 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: August 18, 2010. Anil ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT(s) Present: Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.M.Anand, Addl.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in FIR No.791 dated 06.11.2009, under Sections 398/401 IPC and 25/54/59 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station city Rohtak, District Rohtak. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been continuing in custody since 06.11.2009. It is further contended that only rod has been recovered. It is further contended that co- accused has already been released on bail by learned trial Court. CRM No.M-15125 of 2010 These facts have not been disputed by learned counsel for the State. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Anil, is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Rohtak. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) August 18, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2