IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 389 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 389 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 389 OF 2007 IN IN IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 220 OF 2007 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 220 OF 2007 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 220 OF 2007 Shri Prashat Maohar Khadge ... Applicant (Org.Respondent No.1) versus Shri Vijay Madhukarrao Todkar & Anr. Respondents Mr. Manish Upadhye, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. S.M.Oak.Advocate, for the respondent No.1. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 27th February,2008. DATE: 27th February,2008. DATE: 27th February,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. While admittig the Revision Application,this Court had noted that there are arguable questions raised in the Civil Revisiiion Application. Therefore, ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c) was granted. I do not see any reason to vacate the said order. However, the Civil Revision Application itself may be fixed for final hearing. 3. Therefore, this Application stands disposed of. Revision Application be listed for final hearing. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)