THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN W.P.No.5365 of 2010 ORDER: Heard Sri Ch. Ramasekhara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt Kalpana Ekbote, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (for short ‘GHMC’). The petitioner’s grievance, in this writ petition, is that despite an application being made by her for mutation of her name in the records of the Municipal Corporation, the respondents had not passed any order in this regard till date on the specious plea that, in the absence of registered gift deed being produced, no such mutation could be effected. Smt Kalpana Ekbote, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC would submit that the second respondent would consider the petitioner’s application in accordance with law. In view of the submission of the learned Standing Counsel, I see no reason to examine the various contentions raised in this writ petition. The second respondent before whom the petitioner’s application is pending consideration shall consider it in accordance with law, pass appropriate orders thereupon and communicate his decision to the petitioner within a period of two months from today. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. _______________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J Date:09.03.2010 sj