IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application [APPR] No. 8 of 2011 (Arti D/o. Amar Pande Vs. Manoj Kundanlal Jain and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr.S.M. Patrikar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Santosh Adukia, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 3. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATE : 3 rd MAY, 2011. Heard. The learned advocate for the applicant by this application seeks condonation of delay in preferring the revision application. He submits that the applicant is a lady and was undergoing medical treatment for gynecological problem and as such she was not in a position to move to prefer the revision application at the earliest. He further submits that the reasons for the delay is purely unintentional. The learned advocate for the respondents vehemently opposes the application. In view of the ground raised in the application that the applicant was facing gynecological problem and was under treatment, I am of the opinion that the delay requires to be condoned. The delay is condoned subject to costs of Rs.750/- (Rupees Seven Hundred Fifty Only) payable to the respondents. Costs to be paid within three weeks from today. Application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE *Sandesh