IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.50 of 2010 Date of Decision: October 06, 2010 Kulwinder Kaur .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Ms. Shikha Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. When the matter was heard on 21.7.2010, the following order was passed:- “Learned counsel for the respondent-State has pointed out that the petitioner was appointed in Patiala at Deputy Commissioner’s rates to serve as Part-time Class- IV employee (Water Carrier). On the request of the petitioner, the petitioner was transferred to Sangrur. The Deputy Commissioner’s rates in Sangrur are higher, however, there was no post in existence at Sangrur. Accepting the request of the petitioner, she was posted at Sangrur, however, the salary is being paid at Patiala Deputy Commissioner’s rates. Adjourned to 06.10.2010. SSP, Sangrur, may consider the request of the petitioner to absorb the petitioner in Sangrur and pay the petitioner at the rates permissible in Sangrur.” CWP No.50 of 2010 [2] 2. Learned counsel for the respondents contends that on the request of the petitioner, the petitioner was sent from Patiala to Sangrur. In Sangrur, there is no post available against which the petitioner can be adjusted and therefore, salary is being drawn at Deputy Commissioner’s rates at Patiala. 3. In view of the fact that there is no post available, no relief can possibly be given to the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn. (AJAI LAMBA) October 06, 2010 JUDGE avin