1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No.14/2008 In Civil Application No.7371/2007 (Decided) In Writ Petition No.4208/2007 (Pending) [Sanjeev s/o Late Ramesh Kumar Sinha .vrs. Mineral Exploration Corporation Limited] ........................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................ Mr. S.S. Sanyal, Advocate for the appellant, Mr. M.D. Samel, Advocate for the respondent. .......... CORAM : K.J. ROHEE AND R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 17, 2008. 1. Heard Mr. S.S. Sanyal, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. M.D. Samel, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. By order dated 18.7.2007 the appellant was transferred from Nagpur to Jangareddyagudem (Andhra Pradesh). The appellant challenged the said transfer order by filing complaint before the 2 Industrial Court. The Industrial Court, by order dated 17.8.2007, rejected the application of the appellant for interim stay. Thereafter, the appellant challenged the said order by preferring writ petition. Initially interim stay was granted to the order of transfer. However, by order dated 19.12.2007, the learned Single Judge vacated the interim stay and rejected the application for staying the order of transfer. The said order is under challenge. 3. The above history would show that the Industrial Court as well as the learned Single Judge did not find favour with the appellant. In such circumstances, we do not think that there is any scope for interference in the letters patent appeal. We are not inclined to entertain the appeal. The same is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE asg