IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.DENESAN MONDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2007 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1929 WP(C).No. 10212 of 2007(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- RAJAN A.P., JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT DIVISION, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.K.A.ABRAHAM SRI.BIJU MARTIN RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, ADMINISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.10212/2007. 1 K.K.DENESAN, J. ========================= WP(C).No.10212 OF 2007-N. ========================= Dated this the 26th day of March, 2007. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is working as Junior Superintendent in Local Self Government Department, Alappuzha. She was deployed from the Public Works Department based on Ext.P1 order. It is contended that the petitioner's case for repatriation to the parent department can be considered favourably in the light of the fact that there remains only one year for him to retire from service. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have considered and allowed similar requests. Ext.P6 representation filed by the petitioner requesting to repatriate him to the parent department is pending with the 2nd respondent. 2. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Government pleader for the respondents. 3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, WP(C).No.10212/2007. 2 it is only appropriate that the 2nd respondent takes up for consideration Ext.P6 and passes orders as early as possible, in any event, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this Judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 2nd respondent for information and necessary action. The Writ petition is disposed of as above. K.K.DENESAN, JUDGE. kvs/-