IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10679 of 2009 Between: M/s. B.K.V.V. Restaurant & Bar, rep. by its Licencee, M.V. Ranga Rao, S/o. Narayana Rao R/o. D.NO.11-1155, Chammanagiripeta, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise, A.P., Hyderabad. 2 The Prohibition & Excise Superintendent, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 3 The Prohibition & Excise Inspector, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 4 M/s. Eagle Restaurant and Bar, Rep. by its Licencee, Lingam Anand Kumar, S/o. Poornachandra Rao R/o. Rice Bazar Road, Jagannadhapuram, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MRS.S.NANDA Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3:AGP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE Counsel for Respondent No.4: MR. K.L.N.SWAMY The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.1 to 3 in favouring the 4th respondent in granting renewal of licence for the period June 2009-2010 as discriminatory, illegal and arbitrary.” At the hearing, Smt. S.Nanda, learned counsel for the petitioner sought for permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP.No.13670 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 29th JUNE, 2009. kvni