IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.V.SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.22184 of 2000 Between: Vemula Ramaiah, S/o Mallaiah, Himayathsagar Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R.District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajendra Mandal, R.R.District. 2 The District Collecter, Ranga Reddy District, Khairathabad, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the illegal action of the respondents not issuing Patta Certiﬁcates under ROR Act 1971 and also not issuing farmer's Positions Pass Book in spite of giving various representations and also interfering peaceful position while pending such representations is illegal, arbitrary and violative of ROR Act 1971 and other revenue laws and fundamental rights, consequently direct the respondents to issued Land Patta Certiﬁcate and Farmer's Pass Book to the petitioner in connection with the land Ac.6-00 in Survey No.35 of Himayatnagahr Village, R.R.District and not to interfere from the peaceful position until issue of the Patta Certiﬁcate and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.KOONA REDDY ANJI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.V.SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.22184 OF 2000 O R D E R There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when this case was listed for hearing on 08.09.2008, 15.09.2008, 26.09.2008 and 20.10.2008. Owing to the continued absence of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed ‘for dismissal’ on 23.10.2008. Today, in the forenoon session, when the matter was called there was no representation and the matter was passed over. When the matter is taken up for hearing in the afternoon session, once again there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. ----------------------------- P.V.SANJAY KUMAR,J 23rd OCTOBER, 2008 PGS THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.V.SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.22184 of 2000 23RD OCTOBER, 2008