IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14009 of 2008 1. Najme Alam, Son of Md. Aiyub. 2. Samima Khatoon, wife of Late Md. Abid Khan. Both residents of Mohalla- Buddhuchak, Police Station- Katihar(Sahayak), District- Katihar………………Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR……………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 30.11.10. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners have challenged the order of cognizance dated 28.02.2007 whereby the cognizance has been taken under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the final form was submitted against the petitioners but differing with the final form, cognizance was taken. It is further submitted that the matter relates to a civil dispute and the petitioners are not absolutely involved in dispute. Since the order of cognizance is dated 28.02.2007, on that score alone,I am not inclined to interfere with the matter. However, liberty is given to the petitioners to raise all their contentions at the time of framing of charges if the charges have already not been framed. It is expected that the learned court 2 below will consider all contentions of the petitioners at the time of framing of charges. With this observation, this application is disposed off. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)