S.B. Cr. Misc. Petition No. 1971/2007 (Imran & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.) Date of order : 26.03.2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. Ramesh Purohit for the petitioners. Mr. J.P.S.Choudhary, P.P. Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi for the respondent No.2. Learned counsel appearing for the first informant and the public prosecutor for the State submit that after investigation the police has already filed the charge sheet against petitioner No.1 Imran and petitioner No.2 Abida, however, the police did not find any case against petitioners No.3 Nayamat, petitioner No.4 Ruksana and petitioner No.5 Faruq and therefore, no challan has been filed against them and as such, there is no necessity for seeking quashing of FIR against them. In this view of the matter, the criminal misc. petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, it will be open for the petitioners to raise all the contentions which have been raised in the instant petition before the trial court at the appropriate stage. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp S.B.Cr. Misc. Stay Petition No. 1764/07 In S.B. Cr. Misc. Petition No. 1971/2007 Date of order : 26.03.2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. Ramesh Purohit for the petitioners. Mr. J.P.S.Choudhary, P.P. Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi for the respondent No.2. Since the criminal misc. petition itself has been dismissed as having become infructuous, the stay petition also stands dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp