IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4334 of 2010 Date of Decision: 20.7.2011 *** Sukhbir Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Gurvinder Singh & Ors. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. A.K. Khunger, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The petitioner-defendant is aggrieved with order dated 6.6.2011 passed by the learned trial Court by virtue of which his application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of plaint, has been dismissed. Heard. The petitioner in the impugned application alleged that the plaintiff along with defendant No.2 earlier filed the suit before the learned District Judge, Ganga Nagar (Rajasthan) and after having lost there, they filed the instant suit, which is hit by resjudicata and as such, plaint is liable to be rejected. It is apparent from the perusal of the impugned order that mutations challenged in the present suit were never the subject matter of the earlier litigation, referred to above and was on different footing. In this view of the matter, the Court below rightly concluded that the said judgment rendered in the earlier case does not affect the rights of the plaintiff. There is no illegality or perversity in the impugned order. The revision petition, being without merit, is accordingly dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE July 20, 2011 Jiten