IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8591 of 2008 VIJAY KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 17.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. In the normal course of things, if the respondents had looked into the grievance of the petitioner which is of public kind, there would have been no occasion for the petitioner to travel to the High Court. The Court further records that the issue is such that it does not require any adjudication or interpretation of any law. The issue is very limited with regard to a piece and parcel of land which was donated by the father of the petitioner for public use. It seems there are some encroachment being made on the land which has not only hurt the sentiment of the petitioner but also causing annoyance to the people as such. These are matters which are not entirely a civil dispute. Therefore, based on the representation or application which has been made by the petitioner to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Nimchak Bathani, Khijarsarai, District – Gaya, the matter should be examined with due haste and corrective measures should be taken. Petitioner had also approached many senior officials of the District, but court notices there seems to be a silence at their level too. The writ application is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.6, to attend to the grievance of the petitioner and verify the position on the ground. Rajeev/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)