IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (SI No. b\L/ OF 2011 ./ PETITIONERS Smt. Kamla Singh, W/o Shri Narendra Prakash Singh, aged about 47 years; Caste-Gond, R/o village- Devipur, District— Sarguja (C.G.) VERSUS ./ ESPONDENTS : 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through The Secretary, Department of Schoal Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / ‘* 2) The District . Education Officer, Sarguja (C.G;) ’ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -.. I... w. New a,“ i R HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 412 of201 1 Smt. Kamla Sin. : gh VERSUS : tate o Chhattisgarh & Anothe S f r. PR ETH‘IONE RTS ESPONDEN RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Presen: hri Ashjsh Suranm Advocate for the petitione. hri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for th ORDER ORAL Passe on 02“ day of February, 201 1) (d Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the ‘ etitionen is entitled to benefit of two advance increments o p n ccount ofthe fact that the petitioner has passed B.Ed. examination uring the course of service, at her own cost. It is submitted tha d t h i i g ra te ssue nvolved in the present petition is no loner res integ a t h i ld by p a nd he same as been fnally sette the Sureme Court inAsh l he Scocena v. State ofMP. &r Ora as well as by this Court in t atter of Yashwant Kumar Bharawaj v. Municial Corporatio m d p n, ) t Durg and another and GOpesh Kumar Verma v. The State Gov. t is tiirther submitted that this Court has also taken a similar vie I w in its order dated 6-2-2009 passed in W.P. (S) No.6257 of 2008. earned counsel Iiirther submits that the order dated 29-4-201 L 0 2009 (m) MPJR (SC) 5 2 2006 (11) MPJR CG 96 3 WP (S) No.413o ofzoo \.. W t S r S e a 1 9 s ‘ UAmit passed in W.AN0. 124 of2009, wherein relying upon the judgnent ofthe Supreme Court inAsha Saxena (supra) and the order passed by this Coun in another W.ANo.87/2009, directions have been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two advance increments as per the circular dated 21-9-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, aiter verification of the facts pleaded in the petition. Learned counsel appearing for‘the State/respondents submits that the case of the petitioner would also be considered on the same lines. In view ofthe above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments in accordance with the orders passed in the above-referred cases, atter verification of the facts, pleaded in the petition, within a period of 8 weeks dam today. 2V; Sd/-' Satish K. Agnihotri Judge