ix. 1 ^^ 7:c1'6 I ' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT iTABA] WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226&227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WRIT PETITION N^i^lS_^W 1998 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS «^w s 1» Pramod Singh S/o Shri Vijay Bahadur Singh aged 35 years^Peon Municipal Council^Kirandul^Jagdalpur^Distto BASTAR(M>P«) 2. SmtoShanti Bai W/o LateShri Param Sivan^Sweepcr aged 27 years^Municipal Council^Kirandul^tJagdalpur^ i BASTAR(M«P.) | VERSUS $ l^ State of Madhya Pradesh Through the Secretary Local Self Government^Mantralaya^ BHOPAL. j, 2< Municipal councj.l.Kirandul ^^ Through s The Chief Municipa^ Officer ^ Municipal council ^Kirandixl^Jigdalpur^ BASTAR(M.P.) 3^ 0?he Collector^Jagdalpur BASTAR<,(M<P«) 4^ The Additional Collector^Dantewada Cum Admirsistrative Controlling Officer Municipal CouKicil^Kirandul^ Jagdalpur^BASTARCM^P^) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICI^ 226 &2270F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ., ^) ^ ^/^s{y'i'~ K "^^''7 / .L^ ^' "'T^ ^1.1 m^ ^...^•': ^,-- ^*^. ±^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. No. 464 of 1998 Petitioners Praniod Singh & aiiother Versus Respondents The State of Madhya Pradesh & otiiers Beach : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. A@iihotri. None for flie petitioners. Shri Arv'iiid Dubey, Paiiel law^^er for the respondents No. 1, 3 and 4/State. None for the respoiideiits No. 2. ORAL ORDER (18th Jufy, 2006) The foUox¥iiigoi-der of the Court is passed by Satish H. Ag^iihotri, J. 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. On bofh the occasions, none appes-rs nor ariy representation is made on behalfoffhie petitioners. 2. In view of the above, fhe petition stands disniissed for waiit of proseczition. Bablu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge