IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22177 of 2008 PINTU KUMAR YADAV @ PINTU YADAV & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 05/08/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel representing the State. According to the allegation, 7-8 criminals variously armed came and took away informant’s son Nand Lal Yadav. Altogether five persons are named as accused including the petitioners. Submission is that one similarly situated accused Rameshwar Yadav has been granted bail by this court. The present case has been lodged on account of a case which was lodged by co- accused Rameshwar Yadav which is annexrure-2 with regard to murder that case was registered on 22.10.2006 and the present case has been lodged only with a view to pressurized the petitioners. The fact remains that the victim has not been recovered as yet. There is allegation that the son of the informant was forcibly lifted by these petitioners also and since then he is traceless. No doubt Rameshar Prasad has been granted bail but it appears that major consideration for grant of bail was that he was of 85 years age and was suffering from low vision. Case of the petitioners is distinguishable from the case of Rameshwar Yadav. Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for bail is rejected. avin. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)