-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 64 2004 Ramakant G. Joshi ..Applicant Versus Rajesh S. Sharma ..Respondent Mr. K. J. Nansi for the Applicant. CORAM: DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. DATE: JANUARY 28, 2005 P.C. The learned counsel for the applicant has drawn my attention to clause 10 of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 22nd February, 2001. Clause 10 reads as under: “That any disputes arise between the parties shall be resolved by an arbitrator appointed by mutual consent of both the parties.” 2. The respondent, according to the applicant, has been served. Despite service, none appears on behalf of the respondent. In this view of the matter, the Hon' ble Mr. Justice Ashok Agarwal, retired Chief Justice of Chennai High Court, is requested to accept this arbitration. He would be at liberty to fix his own fees. This application is accordingly -2- disposed of. The parties are directed to appear before the Hon'ble Arbitrator on 7th February, 2005. 3. The Registry is directed to inform the respondent about this order. CHIEF JUSTICE