IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 5103 of 2008 Decided on: 21.09.2010 Kashmir Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner. : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Bimal Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner is seeking regularization as Beldar. Mr. Dilip Sharma, learned vice counsel for the petitioner submits that in sequel to order dated 18.06.1998, his client is still continuing as Beldar. The only relief claimed for is that the respondent-State may be directed to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-State to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization if he had continuously worked for 8 years with 240 days 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- in each calender year and if not already regularized, as per the instructions issued by the State Government. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge September 21, 2010 (K. Attri)