... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1)C.A.NO.8984 OF 2000 IN F.A.NO.1210 OF 2006, 2)C.A.NO.8981 OF 2000 IN F.A.NO.1101 OF 2000 AND 3)C.A.NO.8986 OF 2000 IN F.A.NO.1211 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri S.N. Gawade, A.G.P. Applicant in all Applications. Ms Smita Gaidhani for the Respondent/s in all Applications. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 27, 2006. : JULY 27, 2006. : JULY 27, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned A.G.P. appearing for the Applicant. In these Appeals the Appellant-State Government has challenged judgments and awards dated 10th April, 1997 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, Nasik in references under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Awards have been made more than nine years back and as of today there is no ad-interim order in favour of the Appellant-State. Execution and operation of awards cannot be stayed after lapse of nine years. Hence, no case is made out for grant of stay. ... 2 ... 2. If original claimants have furnished any security at the time of withdrawing compensation amounts from the Reference Court, the securities shall be maintained till the final disposal of the Appeals. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE