IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3888 of 2011 Decided on: 30th May, 2011. Prem Dutt Sharma. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Aggrieved by Annexure P-1, order of transfer the petitioner submitted Annexure P-6, representation before the second respondent. It is submitted that the wife of the petitioner is physically challenged to the extent of 50% and that the academic prospects of his three minor children will be affected due to the transfer being in the middle of the academic session. Still further it is pointed out that the vacancy from where the petitioner has been relieved is still available. The petitioner has also pointed out alternate vacancy. There will be a direction to the second respondent to look into all these aspects and take appropriate action on Annexure P-6, representation within a period of three weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the second respondent. 2 We make it clear that it will be open to the Director to pass even interim order in the matter if required in the exigency of the service. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 30th May, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr/kck) Judge. 3