Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr.M.P.(M) No.1392 of 2008. Dated of Decision: February 25, 2009. Bhuvnesh Awasthi …..… Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. ……. Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Tarlok Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. J.S. Guleria, Asstt. Advocate General. Surinder Singh, J (oral): The petitioner is apprehending arrest in FIR No.353/2008 registered on 26.12.2008, under Sections 379, 411 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code, in Police Station Palampur, District Kangra, for allegedly using the Government supply of cement in the undergoing construction of a private person. Vide order dated Ist January, 2009, the petitioner was granted interim bail and was directed to join the investigation of this case. Since then from time to time, he had been joining the investigation and the interim bail was extended during the investigation. Approximately 80 bags have been recovered by the police from the spot where the construction was being carried out. The bail is only objected to on the ground that the petitioner is not disclosing the source from where he had 2 procured the cement bags. The fact that the recovery of the Government supply of the cement has been effected, from the spot, the disclosure of the source, by the petitioner, in my opinion is not an important fact to deny the bail. Therefore, in these circumstances, the present application is allowed, on the terms and conditions already specified in the order dated 1.1.2009. The application stands disposed of. February 25, 2009. (Surinder Singh) (Pds) Judge.