a [Nill: SENGH F'l-ao// ^.NO..».^^J^^^ ';resente^T5^-----""" IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGA^H AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. ^o^ Of2006 PETITIONER Khodu Lal Tiwari S/o Shri Nanhe LalTiwari, aged about 50 years , Occupation servKe, working on the post of Beat Guard, Assistant Beat- Belgao.n,^^^ F©rest~-—Range--/-"Parichgtra Janakpur , Forest ~ ' ~ Division Manindragarh District Korea (CG), r/o Village and Post Singrauli, P.S. Janakpur, District Korea (CG). VERSUS RESPQNDENTS ( ;A }y".'. '^,. : l.The Stateof Chhattisgarh, through the Secretaiy , Forest Department, Mantralay , D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2.0hief Conservator of Forest, Chhattisgarh , Raipur (CG). 3. Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Manendragarh, District Korea (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 *TT<i^rar*iicb 3:s?'.:qpn?pr, ®^i+i'is,I°icii^y i'O. T'- ^ 200 ^ 3TT^T CR^T (yi(^q^<T) 3I1^T?iTR-(i<+ cTSTTSTf^T^Hl* Soma CTdTW flf??T SI^T 10-8.2006 Mr. Gary Mukhopadhyay, .coun^ Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Advc) >el for the petifc'oner. oate for the State/respondents, on advance petitic|ner oopy. Heard both the counse!. By the Instant writ petition und^ the petitioner has challenged his transf passed by respondent No.1, wherebj Janakpur Forest Range, Manendragarj Learned counsel for the maintained division wise and if the 'imi the sentority of the petitioner will be| allowed to make a representation to appearing for the State/respondents h^ Having heard leamed counsel ciroumstances ofthe case and withoutl the request made by learned counsel Therefore, the petitioner is allowed to ifl grievances annexing a copy of the wri)] from today and respondent No.2 is dir^ month from the date of its reoeipt petitioner, in an objectlve manner, on it| representation ofthe petitioner is in respect ofthe petitioner shall remain| With the directions aforesaid, Consequently, M.(W.)P.No.; Parties are entitled for certified •»i<ilf)<fl-i>iitiiiT^'tecA <Ri<-i;i< ^;3(f^q'3:n^T gs Itir • Artiole 226/227 of the Constitution of India, fer order dated 7th July, 2006 (Annexure P-1) ^ the petitioner has been transferred from to South Surguja Division. submits that seniority of Beat Guard is >ugned order is allowed to be executed then affected, therefore, the petitioner. may be respondent No.2 to which leamed counsel ^s no objection. the parties, having regard to the facts and |expressing any oplnion on merit ofthe case, fbr the petitioner is just, fair and reasonable. ifiake a detailed representation raising all his petition to respondent No.2 within ten days ^cted to decide the representation within one ^fter considering the points raised by the t^ own merits, in accoFdance with law. Till the J^d, the impugned order dated 7m July, 2006, |stayed. h^ petition stands disposed of. also stands disposed of; jopyofthisorder. decidfed thls 31411/2006 Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge ^^ o P.T.O. ^ '^