IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9428 of 2010 USHA KUMARI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 17.06.2010 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. This writ application is being disposed at the stage of admission without a counter affidavit with consent of the Counsel for the parties. The relief sought is to quash the orders dated 14.12.2007 and 30.4.2010 re-determining pay scale of the petitioner and directing recovery of alleged excess payment. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that her claim is covered by a Bench decision of this Court in CWJC No. 4634 of 2009. Learned Counsel for the State, Shri Mandal, rightly submits that it shall be a question of fact for examination by the respondents if the petitioner was similarly situated on facts and in law or not. If she is similarly situated, naturally she shall be entitled to be accorded similar treatment. The writ application is disposed with a direction to the respondents to consider the grievance of the petitioner in light of similar order of this Court in CWJC No. 4634 of 2009 preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt and/or presentation of a copy of this order. Fairness on the part of the respondents demands that they shall not implement the impugned orders till after disposal and consideration of the claim of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)