IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35104 of 2010 MD.KAISHAR & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 12.10.2010 Petitioners are languishing in jail since 14.06.2010 and 15.06.2010 in a case registered under Section 392 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that informant’s Rs. 1,15,000/- was snatched. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that no recovery has been made from the petitioner. Petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. Though the impugned order reflects that petitioner was identified by the informant to which learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner was never been put on T.I.P. and if the petitioner would have been identified at the time of the occurrence, then his name ought to have been mentioned in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that petitioner was not aware about the involvement in the case. Moreover informant deposed during trial of the other accused in which he has not named any person including the petitioners. It is further submitted that petitioners are, at present, involved in two other cases in which they are on bail. 2 Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners namely 1. Md. Kaishar 2. Ravi Mahto, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Khagaria P.S. Case No. 462 of 2009. In view of the criminal history of the petitioner, learned Court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner if the petitioner gets involved in similar nature of the offence. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)