IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE. ORIGINAL SIDE. ORIGINAL SIDE. WRIT PETITION NO. 1350 OF 1992. WRIT PETITION NO. 1350 OF 1992. WRIT PETITION NO. 1350 OF 1992. M/s Gadia Wires & anr. ..Petitioners. vs. Union of India & ors. ..Respondents. Shri M.L. Bansal for the petitiner. Mrs. S.V. Bharucha for respondent No.1. Smt. Srivastav i/b Consulta Juris for respondent No.2. CORAM: V.C.DAGA & CORAM: V.C.DAGA & CORAM: V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 06-04-2005. DATED: 06-04-2005. DATED: 06-04-2005. P.C. 1. Heard rival parties. 2. Looking to the consensus between the parties, it is clear that cause of action for the present petition does not survive in view of the change in the import policy. Even otherwise, interim order has not been complied with. In this view of the matter, petition is dismissed for want of cause of action. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) ********