IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 7TH JANUARY 2008 / 17TH POUSHA 1929 WA.No. 2987 of 2007() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.25018/2007 Dated 17/08/2007 .................... APPELLANT: PETITIONER: ---------------------- PADMANABHAN M.V., S/O.NARAYANAN NAMBIAR, THAYAKKARA, ONAPPARAMBA P.O.NARATH, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN 670 603. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONAL ADMINISTRATION SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR. 3. C.NARAYANAN, KAYAKKAL HOUSE, CHULLIYAD, P.O.MALAPPATTAM, KANNUR DIST. BY G.P.SRI. BENNY GERVASIS THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & P.N. RAVINDRAN, JJ. --------------------------------------------------------------- W.A.NO.2987OF 2007 -------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of January, 2008. JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair, J: The judgment under appeal is attacked based on certain new materials, which the petitioner could collect subsequently. In view of the said position, the proper course open to the petitioner is to seek review of the judgment of the learned Single Judge based on those materials. The writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the contentions of the petitioner and his right to move for review of the judgment before the learned Single Judge. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. cl . 2 . 3