IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2902 of 2010 CHANDRIKA PRASAD DAS S/O LEIKH NARAYAN DAS R/O VILL.- YUGATPUR, P.S.- BARAIL, DISTT.- SAHARSA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE SPECIAL OFFICER CUM DEPUTY SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DON CANAL DIVISION, RAM NAGAR, WEST CHAMPARAN 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, REVENUE DIVISION, KOSHI SCHEME, PURNIA 5. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, REVENUE DIVISION, GANDAK SCHEME, BETIA 6. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, TIRHUT DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR 7. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR ----------- 2 19.02.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that his pensionary benefits are not being fixed correctly taking into consideration the last emoluments which the petitioner was entitled to receive. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a detailed and comprehensive representation before the respondent no.3 with a copy to the respondent no.2. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay. Upon consideration if any of the claims or part of the claim is found not admissible, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner with reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)