IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2008 / 29TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 25152 of 2008(T) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------------- JOHN MATHEW, S/O.LATE MATHEW, AGED 50, KARIKAVAYALIL, KADANADU.P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE KADANAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.2, KOLLAPPILLY, ANTHINAD.P.O, 686651, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, KERALA STATE, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, KADANAD CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., KOLLAPPILLY, ANTHINAD.P.O, KOTTAYAM. 3. THE COMMITTEE OF THE KADANADU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., KOLLAPPILLY, ANTHINAD.P.O, KOTTAYAM. 4. SECRETARY TO CO-OPERATION (GENERAL) SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 5. THE REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, TRIVANDRUM. 6. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM. 7. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY TO CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN – R4 TO R7 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ----------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.25152 OF 2008 (T) ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of August, 2008 J U D G M E N T Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned senior Government Pleader for respondents 4 to 7. Notice to respondents 1 to 3 is dispensed with, preserving their right to move for review of this judgment, if aggrieved. The petitioner claims the benefit of Ext.P7 circular in relation to two loan transactions. That has been rejected as per Ext.P4. The contention of the writ petitioner is that the grounds of rejection are unsustainable. Petitioner could work out his remedies before the Joint Registrar. Hence, without expressing anything on merits, the sixth respondent is directed to take up Ext.P5, consider and issue decision thereon, after hearing necessary parties, within an outer limit of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This writ petition is ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE skr/22/8