, MO k .ooo-n..nu-aa WRIT PETITION No. 103g OF 2002 ard , WRIT PETITIoN UNDER ARTICLE 22§7227 OF THE CONSTI’l‘UTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE‘ORDER OR DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. IN THE HIGH COURT 6F JUDICATURE A‘I‘ BILASHJR (CHHATTI$GARH) PETITIONER : G.S.KAINTH,SON OF,LATE SHRI $.S.KAINTH,AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCCUPATION 3 RETIRED ADDITIONAL WmECUTiVE ENGINEERI—resident cf Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (C.G.) CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY through its Secretary,Raipur, Dagania,Raipur (C.G.) The Chief Engineer, chhattisgarh state Electricity \§ Bilaspur(C.G.) V :3. Senior Accountg officer, W‘ Aa‘wd Chhattisgarh State Electricity Bilaspur (C.G.); Shri Sanjay K. Agalwal, I )y.A.G. for the State. Heald. Though this matter is l admission, on the prayer of 1e with the consent of State Conn th€ admission stage. The gn'evance of the wri part of the Chhattisgarh Stat .sted for hearing on the question of amed counsel for the petitioner and sel, the matter is being disposed of at t petitioner is to the inaction on the 3 Electricity Board in not fixing/his pensionery benefits by taking; into account the service rendered hnder the work charge establishment. counsel for the petitioner, this challenge 1'11 W.P. Nos. 5252/: rendexed by the MP. High Court on 29/01/2001 whereby it was held that'the pensionexy bene ts axe to be computed by including the period of sexvice rendere in the work charge establishment. According to the petitioner, he submitted a representation on 31107/2002 (Annexure Pj4) o the authon'ties, but as it has not 1 I x 3 % § I According to the leaxned i question was the subject matter of 2001 6r. 1569/94 and a decision was E k ants $1 W 3W WW meme! am i em emit § feem i? 3mm 291 01 l ZUU3 Shri B. D. Guru, counsel for the petitioner.