Crl.M.No.M-8777 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-8777 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 5, 2010 Amit Kumar .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.P.M.Anand, Addl.A.G., Haryana. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.24, dated 28.10.2009, registered under Sections 379/188/120-B IPC and 13(1)(d) of P.C.Act, at Police Station State Vigilance Bureau, Gurgaon Sub Unit, Mewat. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 25.3.2010, passed the following order: “Crl.M.No.15853 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M 8777 of 2010 Argues that name of the petitioner has not been mentioned in the FIR and driver, conductor and owner of the truck are already on regular bail. Further argues that there are no allegations against the petitioner-accused and that he has been falsely implicated in this case. Notice of motion for 5.5.2010. However, petitioner is directed to join the investigation Crl.M.No.M-8777 of 2010 (O&M) -2- and in case he is arrested, he shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C..” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the said order, the petitioner has already joined the investigation. It has been stated by learned State counsel as well that the petitioner has joined the investigation and that he is no more required for any custodial interrogation by the police. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. In view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, order dated 25.3.2010, granting interim bail to petitioner-Amit Kumar, is, hereby confirmed subject to the compliance of conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. 5.5.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge