IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 10534 of 2009 Between: B.Harendra Reddy, S/o. Dasaratharami Reddy, Marupuru Gram Panchayat, Podalakuru Mandal, Sri Potti Sree Ramulu Nellore District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector and District Election Authority, Nellore, Sri Potti Sree Ramulu Nellore District. 2 The District Panchayat Officer, Nellore, Sri Potti Srre Ramulu Nellore District. 3 The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Nellore, Sri Potti Srre Ramulu Nellore District. 4 The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Podalakuru Mandal, Sri Potti Sree Ramulu Nellore District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ , order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in informing the 2nd respondent that the Petitioner has submitted resignation to the posts of Ward Member as well as Upa- Sarpanch of Marupuru Gram Panchayat and requested him to take further action in filling up the said vacancies is arbitrary, unreasonable and contrary to the provisions of G.O.Ms.No.217 , P.R. & R.D.Relief (Mandl II), dated 31.3.1995 and accordingly set aside the proceedings of the 4th respondent R.C.NO.A/89/2006, dated 21-10-2008 as well as the consequential proceedings in R.C.No.a/89/2006, dated 23.10.2008 and further direct the respondents not to take any action in filing vacancy of 9th ward Member as well as Upa-Sarpanch of Marupuru Gram Panchayat of Podalakuru Mandal, Sri Potti Sree Ramulu Nellore District Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.MURALIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER: Sri K.Muralidhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.2.6.2009 msv