^ SiNGLE BENCK c. ^.\°^ / 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISOARHAT BILASPUR Writ Petition N0. i 53^/2005 PETITIQNER ^ .1 6^,H ^^ .......r^>::...--^ - ^ ^^^^ .^ ^ RESPQNDENTS —^;^^ /^Sh ^ Snit. Phoolbai Shrivas W/o Mohan Lal Shrivas Aged about 57 years R/o. Near Indira Vihar Gate Sarkanda, Tahsil and Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Mahila Avain Balvikas Dept. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Collector Mahila Avani Balvikas Dept. Distt.Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Additional Collector Mahila Avain Balvikas Dept. Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. The District Panchayat Officer District Panchayat Office Bilaspur, Distt.Bilaspur(C.G.) 5. The District Organisation Officer Mahila Avam. Balvikas Dept. Bilaspur (C.G.) The Superintendent Bal Sanrakshan Grih Nootan Colony, Bilaspur (C.G.) // 2 // <:, . WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ XI-HC-22 3TI^T^T Rrii<=b3:n^r $b^i<=b^f?cT Sarma 3^ ^iiqici^, ^Tn^-'i^, Rcni^^< 3T7^T ^5(Ch <^W^TT^*41cb ^.•fT-.^??:.\.^s'.l. l^t> 36 ^ 200r- 3Tr^T?^<n'^n:^fN' cbl<Mtcl41T1 *4I^QlT ^*fe^ <Rl<-^K ^^rf^TCT^T 04.07.2005 Mr. Goutam Khetrapal. teaijned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, le|amed Panel Lawyer for the State of Chhattisgarh. Learned counsel for the p|etitjoner submite that pursuantto the order dated 05.03.2004 pass^d by this Court in W.P.No.3031 of 2003, a representation was m^de. The District Project Officer, Mahila Evan Balvikas, Departmeijit of Welfare, Bilaspur, passed an order dated 20.08.2004 without ^tating as to from which date the petitioner was regularized and w|hat consequential benefrts she is entitled to. Learned counsel fc|r the petitioner submits ttiat the this Court to file a detaited |of above clarification before the Evam BaMkas, Department of petitioner seeks permission ofl representation for the purpose District Project Officer, Mahila Weffiare.Bilaspur. The petitioner is granted within a period of one month. 71 Evam Bah/ikas, Department of liberty to make a representation he District Project Officer, Mahila WeHare, Bilaspur, is directed to consider the representation of thje petitioner and pass appropriate reasoned order on its own meri^ in accordance with law within a period of 2 months, thereafter. In view ofthe foregoing, th^ petition stands dismissed. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihot" Judge (^^fe^) ^' 9 ¥ ^