IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.M.JAMES TUESDAY, THE 27TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 8TH PHALGUNA 1928 Crl.MC.No. 320 of 2007() ------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER IN BA.4745/2006 .................... PETITIONER: ACCUSED NOS.2 & 7: --------------- 1. SANILAN, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. BHASKARAN, EDAKKATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, NELIKKUNNU KURA DESOM, OLLUKKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. 2. VARGHESE, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O. DEVASSY, THARAYIL HOUSE, KRISHNAPURAM DESOM, OLLUKKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.A.C.DEVY RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT: ----------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.PUZHAKKARA MUHAMMED. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.M. JAMES, J. ------------------------------- Crl.M.C.No. 320 of 2007 ------------------------------- Dated this the 27th February, 2007. O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, as well as the learned Public Prosecutor. There is a complaint by the counsel that the petitioners are unnecessarily retained in the police station for the whole day. This should be avoided. The Public Prosecutor shall ensure the same. The directions contained in clause (b) of the Order, dated 11.8.2006, in B.A.No.4745/2006, is very clear. Therefore, no clarification also is required in that regard. If there is any violation of that order, or if the police is unnecessarily retaining the petitioners, the same shall be brought to the notice of this Court, which shall pass appropriate orders giving specific directions to the police in that regard. Crl.M.C. is closed accordingly. J.M. JAMES, JUDGE nj.