Civil Revision No. 6185 of 2008 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 6185 of 2008 Date of Decision: 11.11.2008 Sadhu Ram …Petitioner Versus Parminder Singh ... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Learned Appellate Authority, exercised its discretion not only for allowing the application filed by the tenant for producing additional evidence but also allowed the landlord to lead evidence in rebuttal. This composite order is being challenged by the tenant only qua the portion by which relief has been granted to the landlord. The discretion exercised by learned Appellate Authority in the facts and circumstances of the case is well made out. While exercising revisional jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, the discretion of learned Appellate Authority shall not be disturbed simply because another view is possible. There is no infirmity in the order, therefore, revisional jurisdiction cannot be exercised in favour of the petitioner. Civil Revision No. 6185 of 2008 2 It will be pertinent to note that Hon'ble the Apex Court had directed learned Appellate Authority to dispose off the appeal within three months. The present revision petition is nothing but delay tactics. Hence, there is no merit in the present revision petition and the same is dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge November 11, 2008 “DK”