THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.27799 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner questions the action of the first respondent in encroaching upon their land in Sy.No.1007, Kukatpally Village, Ranga Reddy District. The petitioner-association states that, in E.P.No.12 of 1996 in O.S.No.581 of 1994, the learned I Additional Subordinate Judge, Ranga Reddy District had executed a sale deed in their favour on 15.04.1996, vide document No.2548/1996, when their vendor viz., Sri Fazellath Hussain had failed to execute the sale deed for an extent of Ac.70.00 in the aforesaid Sy.No.1007. The petitioner-association claims to have filed a complaint, when their adjacent land holder sought to encroach upon their land, as also W.P.No.24721 of 2009 to declare the action of respondents therein, for laying a road through their plots without acquiring them, as illegal and arbitrary. According to them, while matters stood thus, the first respondent, who was allotted a different extent of land in a different survey number, was seeking to forcibly encroach upon their land, and dispossess them therefrom. The petitioner, in effect, seeks an order to injunct the first respondent from interfering with their possession over the property in question. The remedy of the petitioner, in this regard, is by way of a suit before the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction. Disputed questions of title or of possession are, ordinarily, not adjudicated under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the remedy of a civil suit, in which event the Civil Court shall consider the petitioner’s claim on its merits without being influenced by the observations made in this order, the Writ Petition fails and is, accordingly, dismissed. However, in the circumstances, without costs. RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J Date:11.10.2011 usd