IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3383 OF 2003 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1222 OF 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ------------------------------------------------------------------- None for the Petitioners. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO, J. and CORAM : F.I.REBELLO, J. and CORAM : F.I.REBELLO, J. and DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. 17th February, 2006. P.C.: The Petition was directed to be restored on the Petitioners paying costs. There is nothing on record to show that the Petitioners have paid the costs. Even otherwise, we find that the Petition was to challenge the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interests Act. The validity of the said Act has been upheld by the Supreme Court. Hence, no interference is called for. The Petition is dismissed. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)