IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18010 of 2011 Muslim Mian @ Muskim Mian Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3 27.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 337, 338, 353, 307, 186, 448, 427, 341, 504, 379, 393, 380, 120B, 109 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13(a)(b) of the Unlawful Activities Prohibition Act. It is alleged that while relief work of storm affected people was going on, more than 500 miscreants forcibly entered into the block office and damaged the door, windows and furniture. It appears that the wife of the petitioner being the beneficiaries received alleged relief amount prior to the protest and the Sarpanch has given certificate to that effect. It is submitted that the protest was being made for irregularities in the distribution of the storm relief. Considering the fact that other accused persons have been granted bail, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 46/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)