IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 15TH JUNE 2007 / 25TH JYAISHTA 1929 WP(C).No. 25029 of 2004(D) ------------------------------------ OS.439/1999 of PRL.MUNSIFF COURT,THRISSUR ................................................ PETITIONERS: ------------------- 1. K.G.SATHEESH,S/O.GOPALAN, KARANATH VEEDU,P.O.PADIYAM,THRISSUR DIST. 2. A.K.CHANDADAS,AYINIKUNNATH VEEDU, PUTHENPEEDIKA P.O.,THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.U.O.JOSE RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- M/S.THE PERINGOTTUKARA NAMBOODIRI YOGAKSHEMA SABHA,ANTHIKKAD,THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.V.R.KESAVA KAIMAL SRI.N.M.MADHU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/06/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 25029/2004 D APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE ORDER IN EP NO. 1325/01 OF O.S NO. 439/99 DT. 10/3/2003 OF THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF AT THRISSUR. True copy tga KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- W.P. (C). NO. 25029 OF 2004 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of June, 2007. J U D G M E N T Challenge is on Exhibit P1 order passed by the Munsiff Court in E.P. 1325/2001. The Execution Court found that the petitioners who are judgment debtors have sufficient means to pay off the decree debt and that their attempt was only to evade the payment. 2. It is seen that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioners had deposited an amount of Rs. 10,000/-. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that if it is only a matter of time it is for the petitioners to approach the respondent, in which case, the request can be considered. Without prejudice to such liberty to the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp