1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION Nos. 1292 & 1307 OF 2010. Damodar Jairao Sao and another -: versus :- The Dy. Charity Commissioner and another. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : MARCH 30, 2010. Heard Shri A.P. Thakre, learned counsel for petitioners, learned A.G.P. for respondent no.1 and Shri A.S. Chandurkar, learned counsel for respondent no.2. Shri Thakre, learned counsel has apprehension that earlier observations by the Higher Authorities that Wasudeo was never the member of the Trust and could not have been elected as Secretary thereof are getting affected or prejudice by the impugned orders. It is apparent that the change report proceedings are pending and to prosecute that Change report Wasudeo has been elected to substitute the deceased reporting trustee. The impugned order only grants that permission to Wasudeo and does not confer any additional legal status or cloth him with any new right in the matter. All observations and findings by the Competent Authority made in accordance with law 2 against Wasudeo can be pressed into service by present petitioners in those change report proceedings. It is therefore, apparent that apprehension expressed by Shri Thakre, learned counsel is misconceived. All objections raised by Shri Thakre learned counsel in the present petition to the status of Wasudeo are therefore kept open for consideration by the Competent Authority in accordance with the law. Shri Chandurkar, learned counsel for Wasudeo wants to add certain facts to the record, however, it is apparent that this Court also has not eclipsed in any way the contention of Wasudeo. All questions are therefore left open for determination by the Competent Authority. Subject to this Writ Petitions are disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rgd.