1 CRA No.954/2000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.954/2000 1) Smt.Shiverathibai w/o Harinath Gupta and Ors. - APPLICANTS VERSUS 1) Omprakash s/o Shriram Holani and others. - RESPONDENTS ***** Mr.SP Salgar, Adv. h/for Mr.SB Talekar, Advocate for Applicants; Mr.SG Chapalgaonkar, Adv. for Respondents. ----- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 14th NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : 1) On 5.1.2001 Rule was issued in the Civil Revision Application. 2) A joint pursis dated 14.11.2011 is tendered, signed by the revision applicants – 12 in numbers including the legal representatives and the respondents – 5 in numbers. 3) The parties are present in the court, identified by the respective advocates. The Joint 2 CRA No.954/2000 pursis is taken on record. 4) By virtue of the joint pursis the respondents had agreed to hand over the possession of the suit shop to the revision petitioners/applicants within a week from today, the 14.11.2011. The revision petitioners/applicants have agreed to pay an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh) to the respondents in lieu of vacating and handing over the possession of the suit shop. 5) Mr.Chapalgaonkar, learned Counsel, clarifies, indeed, this amount of Rs.1,00,000/- covers the price of the furniture and fixture fitted in the suit shop, which would be retained by the revision petitioners/landlords. 6) The respondents agree that they would not claim in future before any forum of any rights of the suit premises/shop, as they have surrendered all their rights, interest in the suit shop. 7) Mr.Chapalgaonkar says, none of the respondents has adverse interest to each other and receipt of Rs.1,00,000/-, referred above, is by free will, consent, without any coercion or allurement. It is, to repeat, for the furniture 3 CRA No.954/2000 and fixture fitted in the suit shop, which has been compensated to the respondents. 8) The Civil Revision Application is disposed of in terms of the joint pursis and the statements referred above. Rule is made partly absolute in the aforesaid terms. In view of disposal of CRA, CA No.12870/2008 for issuance of fresh notice, does not survive, disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/