RSA No. 213 of 2006. 2.6.2009 Present:- Mr. Dinesh Bhanot, counsel for the appellant. Mr. R.K.Gautam, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Archna Dutt, counsel for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Sanjay Ranta, Advocate, vice Mr. G.S.Rathore, counsel for respondent No.6. The suit was filed by appellant that original defendant No.3 Trilochan Singh in collusion with defendant No.1 Amarjeet Singh and defendant No.2 Gurcharanjeet Singh to defeat and delay the realization of loan which was given by Punjab National Bank to Trilochan Singh had executed sale deed dated 4.2.1993 Ex.D-1. The Punjab National Bank, Nalagarh had filed a suit for recovery against Trilochan Singh, original defendant No.3 and appellant Lal Singh. The appellant was guarantor of Trilochan Singh in the loan which was given by Punjab National Bank to Trilochan Singh. The suit was decreed on 12.8.1997. Thereafter, appellant had paid the decretal amount. Trilochan Singh sold the suit property to Amarjeet Singh and Gurcharanjeet Singh on 4.2.1993 vide sale deed Ex.D-1, which was assailed in the present suit. In other words, impugned sale took place much before the appellant had actually paid the decretal amount. The appellant stepped into the shoes of Punjab National Bank creditor of Trilochan Singh only after paying the decretal amount and before that the appellant was not creditor of Trilochan Singh. The two Courts below have concurrently held that Amarjeet Singh and Gurcharanjeet Singh vendees of sale deed Ex.D-1 are bonafide purchasers for valuable consideration. This is a finding of fact. No substantial question of law is involved in the appeal, which is accordingly dismissed. (Kuldip Singh), June 2, 2009. Judge. (GR)