IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.36079 of 2010 1. DOMI YADAV 2. Munni Devi 3. Indu Devi 4. Ajay Yadav Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 24.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are alleged for killing informant’s sister for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry for which she was being tortured soon before the death within 7 years of the marriage in matrimonial house. Petitioner no.1 is father-in-law, petitioner no.2, mother-in-law, petitioner no. 3, unmarried younger sister-in-law (Nanad) and petitioner no.4, unmarried younger brother-in-law (Dewar). Submission is that deceased consumed Sulfas due to differences with her husband and petitioners no. 3 and 4 have no concern with the incident if really Sulfas was provided to the deceased. Material is there to corroborate demand of dowry and torture for its non-fulfillment. No doubt, petitioner no.3 is un- married daughter-in-law and petitioner no.4, un-married brother- in-law of the deceased but petitioners no. 1 and 2 are father-in-law and mother-in-law who never can be exonerated from the liability. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, prayer of the petitioners no. 3 and 4 is allowed and at the same time, prayer of the petitioners no. 1 and 2 is rejected. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in 2 connection with Narahat P.S. Case No. 60 of 2010 above named petitioners no. 3 and 4 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nawada subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)