BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the First day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15510 of 2011 PRATHAB ... PETITIONER Vs STATE REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, USILAMPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.582 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT FOR PETITIONER : M/S.VEERA.KATHIRAVAN ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC.438 CR.P.C. ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 366 of I.P.C in Crime Number 582 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, the petitioner/accused has approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is ranked as A-5 in this case with the allegation that he has helped the main accused in abducting the victim girl. He would further submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not involved in the said crime. He would also submit that the victim girl has been produced before this Court in H.C.P.No.978 of 2011 on 25.11.2011 and she was set at liberty and therefore there is no impediment for this Court to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. He would also submit that his parents, who were ranked as A-2 and A-3 with the similar accusation have already been released on anticipatory bail and the petitioner may also be considered for the anticipatory bail. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the girl was secured and produced before this Court in H.C.P.No.978 of 2011 on 25.11.2011 and she has been restored to her father. He would further submit that investigation is pending and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, suitable conditions may be imposed. 5.Considering the submissions made by both sides, I could see that the victim girl had been secured and restored to her father and the co- accused A-2 and A-3 were already granted anticipatory bail and there is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ no serious overt act against the petitioner and therefore, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the concerned Judicial Magistrate and on executing a bond with two sureties for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Usilampatti and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 6.00 p.m until further orders; and the petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 01/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, USILAMPATTI. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, USILAMPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC TO M/S.VEERA.KATHIRAVAN, ADVOCATE SR.NO.42295. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15510 of 2011 Date :01/12/2011 2P/6C RPB : 07.12.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/