IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43227 of 2009 BIRENDRA KUMAR SISODIA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 06.01.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The present application has been filed seeking modification in the order dated 5.8.2009, passed in Cr.Misc. No.27971 of 2009. The petitioner had moved this Court for grant of anticipatory bail in Cr.Misc.No. 422 of 2009. Under order dated 18.04.2009 anticipatory bail was allowed and he was directed to surrender within a period of four weeks and furnish bail bonds. The petitioner did not obey the said order. Instead, he moved an application( Cr. Misc. No. 27971 of 2009) seeking extension of time for his surrender. Having regard to the submissions and materials on record, this Court under order dated 05.08.2009, passed the following orders: “For the reasons disclosed in this petition, it is allowed and time till 17th of August, 2009 is granted for surrender of the abovenamed petitioners in the court below (CJM Rohtas, Sasaram, in connection with Sasaram (Model) P.S.Case No.634 of 2008, G.R.No.1852 of 2008). This order is being passed subject to the conditions that the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.500/- with the Patna High Court Legal Aid Committee and produce a receipt thereof along with the bails bonds in the court below. The order dated 18.04.2009, passed in Cr.Misc.No.422 of 2009, is modified to that extent only.” The said period lapsed on 17.08.2009. The present application has been filed in this Court on 02.12.2009 seeking further - 2 - indulgence of this Court. It is submitted that because of the fact that the petitioner was posted in Jammu & Kashmir in CRPF, he could not surrender in time. Without enclosing the supporting documents, the petitioner has disclosed as under in paragraph 4 of the present application: “That it is most respectfully submitted and stated that the petitioner is in Govt. job in C..R.P.F. working as constable and at present he is posted in Kashmir(At Sri Nagar) in Jammu 7 Kashmir State and due to his urgent duty of force in C.R.P.F. the petitioner unfortunately again failed to surrender and furnish bail bond within the stipulated prescribed period of time as granted to him by this Hon’ble Court.” This Court is convinced that the petitioner has scanty regards for the Court’s order. Earlier, at his request, the time for his surrender was extended which again has not been respected. In the present application also no adequate and/or sufficient ground(s) have been disclosed enabling this Court to exercise its discretion. This application is accordingly dismissed. . hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )