IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44100 of 2008 DHARMENDRA KUMAR @ PAPPU RANA son of Birchandra Singh. resident of vllage-Majirabad, P.S.-Goraul, Dist.-Vaishali. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 27.3.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is in custody since 5.2.2008 in a case under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code regarding robbery of rupees seven lakh forty thousand by two miscreants. In the T.I.P. the petitioner has been identified. A report has been called for. According to the report three witnesses have been examined and they have supported the prosecution case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the witnesses have supported the case but they have not named the petitioner as an accused. Considering the fact that the trial is going on and the petitioner has been identified in the T.I.Parade, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail is rejected. The petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after examination of the informant. Md.S. (Shyam Kishore Sharma,J.)