IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.M.P.(M) No. 377 of 2007 Date of decision 19.6.2007 Anil Rakta …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. …Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice : Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. B.N. sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Ashok Chaudhary, Addl. A.G. Surjit Singh, Judge ( Oral ) Heard and gone through the record. 2. The applicant is alleged to have induced by deceitful means a girl to establish physical intimacy with him. He promised to marry her and had been having sexual intercourse with her regularly for about three years. When the girl became pregnant, he refused to marry her. These are the allegations made by the girl against the applicant in the F.I.R. 3. Looking to the gravity of the allegations, I do not think this is a fit case where the Court should exercise its discretion in the matter of grant of anticipatory bail in favour of the accused. Hence, the application is dismissed. June 19, 2007 (BC) ( Surjit Singh ), J. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?