IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.3468 of 2010 Date of Decision : February 26, 2010. Kapoor Chand and others .....Petitioners versus Pepsu Road Transport Corporation and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.C.Chatrath, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners who were in the service of Pepsu Road Transport Corporation (P.R.T.C.), have retired w.e.f. 30.6.2008, 31.3.2008 and 31.7.2008, respectively. They seek a mandamus to direct the respondents to release their gratuity, commuted value of pension and arrears of dearness allowance etc., in accordance with the Punjab Road Transport Corporation Employees Pension/Gratuity and General Provident Fund Regulation, 1992, keeping in view the directions issued by this Court in the case of Gujjar Singh and others versus PRTC and others, 2005 (4) SCT 67. In this regard, the petitioners are said to have already served a C.W.P.No .3468 of 2010 2 legal notice dated 9.1.2010 (Annexure P-4) on the respondents but no response thereto has been received so far. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners at some length and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to the respondents to take cognizance of the legal notice dated 9.1.2010 (Annexure P-4) served on behalf of the petitioners and redress their grievances at the earliest but not later than 3 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. It is further directed that whatever is found due, shall also be released to the petitioners within the afore- stated period. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 26-02-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE