IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1048 of 2007 SUGIYA DEVI Versus RAMCHARITRA YADAV ----------- 2 26/8/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In view of the finding recorded by the court below holding that the petitioner has means to maintain and in fact is being maintained by her son, this Court will not find any error in the impugned order. In the event there be a fresh cause of action either on account of shrinking of income of the petitioner or any other changed circumstances, she will have liberty to approach the court below on the basis of such new cause of action for claiming maintenance, but that will not mean that any of the fact which has been taken into consideration in the impugned order will be made subject matter of review. With the aforementioned observations this application is hereby dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. ) Abhay Kumar