..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4449 OF 2008 Mrs.Anjali Bandu Kulkarni. ..Applicant. Versus 1. State of Maharashtra, & 2. Saraswat Co-operative Bank. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Niteen Pradhan, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.Harshad Bhadbhade, Adv. for respondent No.2. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 15th December, 2008. DATED : 15th December, 2008. DATED : 15th December, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant-orig.accused, the learned Advocate for respondent No.2 - orig.complainant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking quashing of FIR No.16 of 2008 of Meghwadi police station. The said case is now numbered as C.R. No.4 of 2008 of EOW, Unit-I, Crime Branch, Mumbai. The said case is under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code. 3. Briefly stated the prosecution case is that the ..(2).. applicant took a loan from the complainant Bank and she did not use the money disbursed for the purpose of which the loan was given. 4. The learned Advocate for the complainant has stated that the entire amount has been paid and the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and the complainant Bank does not wish to pursue the prosecution any further. Hence, he stated that the FIR may be quashed. 5. In view of the statement made by the learned Advocate for the complainant Bank, in my view no purpose would be achieved by continuing with the prosecution of the said case. Hence, FIR No.16 of 2008 of Meghwadi police station, which is now numbered as C.R. No.4 of 2008 of EOW, Unit-I, Crime Branch, Mumbai and the proceedings relating thereto are quashed. The present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 6. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)