r c^'^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C..G.) "\0lCi /2009 A^PPELLANT >.-»•" »*t ,,^-J^^ ^^ ^The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Parmanand Bhawan Rajendra Park Chook, Durg Distt. - Durg (C.G.) Through Divisional Manager, Divisional Office Durg, Durg (C.G.) VERSUS WSPONDENTS --^ Girish Narayan Sharma, aged about 42 years, R/o Village and Post Badgaon, Tah.Pakhanjur Distt. Kanker (C.G.) Omprakash Alis Prakash Kumar Sahu, S/o Hemlal Sahu, aged about 29 years, R/o Village and Post Badgaon, Tah.Pakhanjur Distt. Kanker (C.G.) MISC. APPEAL (CLA1M) UNDER SECTION 173 OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, ri •^i-'y •iMI^ifl ^iT ftl^I4* I^FTsCTP ip'n ^ti<w a**flq* *)l*«11tl»*<l<l> 'S'si ^i<fici<<, afllo'is, [si<>ii*i^< ,.^^L ^O.(;04./e9 "Wl 200 •ail^ifl 'T5W ('^^PS?) c«!tiiti<)^fer <»*t^<fl VJ T. J. "VT £lcl^.-^^-ft.^."3t ^. Ths Lin Raj Dui Ma Du: VE SPONDENTS 1. Gir R/c Pat rh-t- '^.-L. >a< •29' Sa<| Xal <>T .nT<S'IT!f' .^t^. B^f .i^. _,? ,,i ^;!,^ 21- Sfcn VfpmTiwari, Advoij 2. Hsard on admission. 3.' Tliis appsal is directed 2009 passed by the Additiona!| (FTC), Balod, Distt. Durg m ^>ffli<'pft't '^Pl^f ^f 'felZt <Rnt!rl< i?dild*l <HI^!!1 Oriental Iflsurance Compairy' lited, Parmauasid Bhawan scdra paA Chook, Diirg Distt 'g (CG), 'Lhrougli Divisional saeer. Dhdsiona! Offlce. Durs. -L ^'—.^'L-l'-i. •S-/—^a.-i ^c'^4''tt -i^^' •v+-i- •g(CG) ' RSUS .sh Narayan Shanna, S/o S}m ajeet Shanrsa, aged about 42 years, vi'lage and Post Badgaon, Tah. ianjur Distt. Kanker (CG) prakash alias: Prakash Kiunar u, S/o Henilal SaiiiL aged 'about years, R''o. :vil2age and Post igaon, Tah. Pakhanjur; Distt. iker (CG) CTION 173 OF MOT< SACr 988 E N.K. AGAmVAI ate, for the aDpellant. igaii'ist no fault avvard dated 3-2- Motor Aceide;^: Ciaims Tribunal Motoi- Accident C'aim Case No. 'V ^ire^^^fl^ tFE(ffl<!i-ar^^-fRIlf<—FS/95—11 /2008—1,00,000. Tl dll^ill ^it ft-fi* [^Ff **ri< a*n on^i i»>*n<t> *<I*ICTI ti»*n«i» 3^ •<11<1Kyl<i, ®fl1'M'l<o,(sK'll'Hy —.....ff^^:.^^.!^. ^P...^:.^....=.^...................^..^^QP ^n^l Traq? (i<:ily«i,^) c«tra<W^a <tiA;fl 36/2008 holdinp the claimant Section 142 oftlie Motor Vehicl referred to as 'tlie Act'') and 25.000/- as comoensation under 4. S!m Tiwari, leai-ned coiilis any ground which is available Section 147 or Section 149 ofl raised bv liim is tfaat leamec^ compensation under Sectioa consideration the eertificate ofd a pnvate cioctor, 5. This appsa! dessrves to } mdisDUtablv, ia relation to a th| the insurer ean deny its liabi!ityj Section 149 ofthe Act. Ordinarl no right to question the quaEti^ aiiy !eave havirig been gi'anted i^ ofthe Act. It is not in dispute 170 ofthe Act has been dismiss] merelv because the certificate ^ by the doctor ofa pnvate hospi^ *wf<'i<il"< wrif^fei^ <fatsi^ ^rdiltiH an^r bemianentlv disabied in tenii3 of 3S Act, 1988 (Iw^short, hereinafter |3iereby passed as award of Rs. Sectio"140oftheAct. el fbr the appellaiit did not raise to t2ie Insurance Compaiiy uader the Act and t2ie oiity conteHtion Tribuna! erred m awarding tlie !40 of the Act by talung info iisabilitv whichhas been issued bv dismissed oa tvi'o gi-ounds; first rd party, the grounds upo.n wl-iich are contained in suS-ssctiori (2) of ly, insurance compaiiy would haye m of compensatiofi in absence of 1 its favour in temis of Section 170 that the application under Sectioa sd by leamed trial Court. Secosdly >f peniiaiient disabi'ity was issued al and was not issued by the doctor ^p MV llfUvM <|a|-]i4'IM—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000. "llSfl^itfeNi 'WT Oll^fl ^6*ffq* *<»«<niaxtrat 3^'=')pncfq, siTilyie, fadtyg?: , pv^c :"^^ ••---^200 ^II^IJf^; (Tp^pl^) iww oftti an^ii of a Govemmeat hospital, it cs certificate, award under Sectioa 6. iii this view ofthe matts the aooellaHt is liable to be dism T)i<ilCT«fli^i*i<riif^f^^ -<f3|^|< ^ aEfRpr gn^r hnot be said that based oa such 140 ofthe Act camiot be passed. |r above, this appea! preferred by Issed.and is faerebv dismissed, N.K. Ag! |g£[ill^. IlSli- •27_-9 'OL-t 'c^l 18i,liiis,te>..ii.B:ias&fe BffiiiMSsSISSSgS