IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.R.No.2419/2010(O&M) Date of decision: 6.9.2010. Charan Singh ....................Petitioner v. State of Haryana .....................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Mr.Naveen Kaushik,Advocate for the petitioner. Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral) Petitioner-Charan Singh has filed the present revision petition under Section 401 Cr.PC challenging the judgment and order dated 20.7.2010 passed by learned Sessions Judge,Faridabad, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner and his other co-convicts was dismissed and the order of conviction and sentence dated 10.3.2010 passed by learned Addl.CJM,Faridabad, holding the petitioner and his co-convicts guilty under Section 411 IPC were sentenced to undero RI for a period of six months and pay a fine of Rs.1000/- each, was affirmed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the impugned order is liable to be set aside as the same is based on mis- reading of evidence and thus non-application of judicial mind. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I find no merit in the submissions made by him. It has come on record that the stolen vehicle-a motorcycle was recovered from the petitioner and his co-convicts while they were riding on the same. On demand, they were unable to produce the papers viz. registration certificate, insurance policy of the said vehicle. Both the courts below,on the basis of evidence produced on record have found that they were in conscious possession of the motorcycle, which they had confessed to have stolen from SRS Mall, Sector 12, Faridabad. Non-joining of any independent witness would be insignificant as there are no allegations of any ill-will against any of the prosecution witnesses-police officials. With regard to minor contradictions in the testimony of prosecution witnesses, leaned Sessions Judges has rightly observed that some variations in temper and tenor of the evidence of official witnesses appearing here and there would not make their evidence less important and no circumstances vitiating the creditworthiness of the witnesses examined by the prosecution has emerged. Learned counsel for the petitioner, during the course of hearing, has miserably failed to show that the impugned order suffers from any illegality or perversity. Accordingly,finding no merit in this revision petition the same is hereby dismissed. 6.9.2010 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge