IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42929 of 2010 RAJU MISTRI @ SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA, SON OF LATE BHOLA MISTRI, RESIDENT OF KAZICHAK, P.S. BARH, DISTRICT PATNA …..PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 02/ 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is an accused for offences punishable under sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against several co-accused including the petitioner is that they have removed 250 sheesham trees standing in Barh Bazar Samittee Campus. He further submits that even dead father of the petitioner has been named as an accused in the instant case. He also submits that practically it is impossible that 250 sheesham tress would be removed from the campus of the Bazar Samittee without knowledge of the authorities of the Bazar Samittee. He also avers that the entire allegation is false and frivolous and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. He further argues that the pieces of the trees were recovered from the road and not from the land of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within fifteen days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in the court below, the sole petitioners, namely, Raju Mistri @ Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Kumar Sharma is directed to 2 be enlarged on bail on executing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (ten thousand ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh (District Patna), in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 21/2010 dated 19.01.2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )