1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1339 of 2010 IN M.C.A.ST.NO.18670/2010 IN M.C.A. NO.927/2010 IN S.A.ST.NO.4790/2010 Jitendrakumar s/o Rukhamanand @ Shankarlal Agrawal and another Versus Babulal s/o Sagarmal Agrawal and another _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Shri B.M. Waranashiwar, Advocate for the applicants/ appellants. Shri M.A. Kadu, A.G.P. for respondent No.2. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : 18.02.2011. By the above Civil Application, the applicants/ appellants seek condonation of delay of 83 days in filing the application for review of the order dated 24-6-2010. The reasons why the delay has occasioned, are mentioned in the Civil Application. None appears for respondent No.1 though served. The learned A.G.P. submits to the orders of the Court. The Civil Application is, therefore, allowed. Resultantly, the delay of 83 days in filing the application for review of the order stands condoned. Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. 2 MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.18670/2010. By the above Civil Application, the applicants/ appellants seek review of the order dated 24-6-2010. By the said order, the application filed by the applicants/appellant to sue in forma pauparis has already been rejected. The review is sought on the self same grounds as the original application. In my view, considering the report of Tahsildar dated 16th June, 2010 no case for review is made out. The review application is accordingly rejected. JUDGE pma