: 1 : USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1158 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.1717 OF 1983 Vile Parle Nirmal Bhavan Premises Co-op. Soc. Ltd. .. Plaintiff V/s. Anantrai D. Doshi & Ors. .. Defendants ..... Ms. Vandana Santara i/by R.T. Parekh & Co. for the plaintiff Mr. Sean Wasoodew for defendant No.1 & in support of Notice of Motion. Mr. M.M. Vashi for defendant Nos.2(a & b) and in support of Chamber Summons. Mr. Purshottam Chavan for administrator. ..... CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 27TH JULY, 2009. P.C. : 1. It is stated that the plaintiff is a Co-operative Housing Society. The Chamber Summons is moved by defendant Nos.2a and 2b seeking amendment of the plaint, as according to these defendants, an Administrator has been appointed in respect of the plaintiff society. : 2 : 2. It is not in serious dispute that the appointment of the administrator is not comparable to that of liquidator. The provisions of Maharashtra Co- operative Society s Act, 1960 on that behalf are clear. In such circumstances, I am of the opinion that it is not necessary to implead the Administrator as a party to the suit or substitute him as plaintiff accordingly. 3. In terms of Section 77A(3), the Administrator is obliged to take steps that are provided therein. In these circumstances, the chamber summons is misconceived and need not be entertained and stands accordingly disposed of. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)