THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Civil Revision Petition No.5265 of 2009 ORDER: This civil revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the judgment, dated 09.09.2009, passed in C.M.A.No.197 of 2006 on the file of the Principal District Judge’s Court, Ranga Reddy District. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent herein, as plaintiff, laid the suit in O.S.No.2261 of 2006, on the file of the Additional Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Ranga Reddy District, against the petitioners herein, seeking permanent injunction, and also filed I.A.No.3058 of 2006 in the said suit, seeking temporary injunction, restraining the petitioners-defendants from interfering with his peaceful possession of the suit schedule property viz., plot bearing No.39, admeasuring 200 square yards, in Sy.No.354 of Narsingi Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, and obtained ad-interim injunction on 27.06.2006. Thereafter, the petitioners herein filed counter, resisting the I.A., and it was their case that the plaintiff, by giving wrong boundaries, obtained ad-interim injunction with regard to their house property bearing No.2-76 situated in Sy.No.298 and has been trying to dispossess them from the said house property. The trial Court, taking into consideration the rival contentions and the documentary evidence available on record, made the ad-interim injunction granted on 27.06.2006 absolute and allowed the I.A. accordingly, by order dated 09.08.2006. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioners filed civil miscellaneous appeal in C.M.A.No.197 of 2006 before the Principal District Judge’s Court, Ranga Reddy District, and the same was dismissed on 09.09.2009, by the impugned judgment. Hence the present civil revision petition. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the impugned judgment and other material available on record. The trial Court, after going through the documents filed by the plaintiff to prove his prima facie possession of the suit schedule property, found that the suit schedule plot forms part of Sy.No.354 only, but not Sy.No.298 as alleged by the defendants, and that the plaintiff has strong prima facie case in his favour. The trial Court has also perused the documents filed by the defendants- petitioners herein and observed that all those documents pertain to house bearing No.2-76, but no document has been filed to show that the said house forms part of Sy.No.298. In those circumstances, the trial Court has allowed the petition filed by the plaintiff and made the ad-interim injunction, granted earlier, absolute. The first appellate Court, having considered the matter in detail, concurred with the findings arrived at by the trial Court and dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioners herein, and I see no reason whatsoever to interfere with the same, in exercise of jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed without costs. However, the trial Court shall dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible and, till such time, status quo obtaining as on today shall be maintained by the parties. ___________________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 1st February 2010 IBL