IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 5TH JULY 2011 / 14TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 16576 of 2011(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JOSE ANTONY, PAZHAMPILLY BUILDING, CHITTOOR ROAD, VADUTHALA, COCHIN-682023. BY ADVS. SRI.K.RAMESH SMT.LAKSHMI RAJAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TELECOM DEPARTMENT, NEW DELHI-110001. 2. BSNL, REP. BY THE ASST. GENERAL MANAGER, (BULDING AND PLANNING), OFFICE, VADUTHALA-682016. R1 BY ASG. P.P. PARAMESWARAN NAIR R2 BY ADV. SRI. P.A. AUGUSTINE,SC,BHARAT SANCHAR NIG THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 16576 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 : COPY OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT DATED 28.04.2008 P2 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION BEFORE THE AREA MANAGER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 13.01.2010. P3 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 04.05.2010 SENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER. P4 : COPY OF THE REMINDER DATED 03.09.2010 P5 : COPY OF THE LAWYER'S NOTICE DATED 19.02.2011 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE smvd ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 16576 OF 2011 (V) ===================== Dated this the 5th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T The writ petition was filed complaining of inaction on the part of the 2nd respondent in renewing the lease pertaining to the premises taken on lease from the petitioner. 2. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent reported that the lease was renewed and the rent deed was also executed 0n 4/7/2011. In that view of the matter, this writ petition virtually has become infructuous and therefore is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp