IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 8325 of 2011 Date of Decision : October 11, 2011 Ashok Kumar … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others … Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R. K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for respondents-State. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “(i) That writ in the nature of mandamus may very kindly be issued by directing the respondents to give the work charge status/regularization to the petitioner with effect from 01.11.1993 instead of 17.12.2000 against the post of Surveyor with all consequential benefits while taking into consideration the observation made by the Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in C.W.P. No. 611/1995, in the interest and fair play. (ii) That the respondents may further be directed to decide the representation dated 20.3.2011 of the petitioner, Annexure P-4, while taking into consideration the observation made by the Hon’ble High Court of H.P. in C.W.P. No. 611/1995, in the interest of justice and fair play.” 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Annexure P-4, representation is pending consideration before the respondents. There will be a direction to the second respondent/competent authority to consider Annexure P-4, representation and take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law, equity and justice within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the second respondent/competent authority. 3. Writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. October 11, 2011 (PK/C)