Crl. Writ Petition No.1703 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Writ Petition No.1703 of 2010 Date of Decision: October 28, 2010 Narinder Kumar Mittal ........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ........Respondent ****** CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA By Post Present : Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. SABINA, J. The complaint filed by Narinder Kumar Mittal was ordered to be taken up on the judicial side. Notice of motion was issued in this case. State has filed reply in this case and preliminary submission No.1 reads as under :- “That prior to the present petition the matter has already been enquired by the Police deeply and thoroughly. The true facts which came to light from the enquiry is that there were two complaints from both the sides against each other. Nisha Rani, who is daughter-in-law of present petitioner made a complaint against the petitioner alleging that behind the missing of his husband Sunny Mittal, present petitioner Narinder Mittal and his wife Madhu Mittal are actively involved. The copy of Crl. Writ Petition No.1703 of 2010 2 complaint is Annexure R-1. She further leveled the allegation of demand of dowry against the petitioner and his wife. As per the version of Nisha Rani, Present petitioner through this method of harassment want to break down their marriage. On the other hand Police has already received the present petition in shape of complaint from the petitioner and both the complaints were enquired together. As per enquiry Report this was the case of love marriage of the son of the petitioner namely Sunny with Nisha on 02.3.2010 and both filed a Writ Crm Misc No. 6415 of 2010, wherein this Hon'ble Court directed the Police of Faridkot to protect the file and liberty of the petitioners in that petition and disposed off the petition on 4.6.2010. After few days parents of Nisha and Sunny accepted their marriage and gave a party in Silica Resort on 10.3.2010 to celebrate their marriage. Thereafter, Nisha and Sunny started residing at Kotkapura in the house of Petitioner. On 29.7.2010 the present petition vide Report No. 8 moved an application that his son Sunny who was working with HDFC Bank at Bagha Purana, District Moga and was posted on clearing duty who on 27.7.2010 at about 7 PM has left the house and has not returned so far. He further stated that he has doubt on any body in his missing. Copy of Report No. 8 is R-2. On enquiry Police found that the matter was not of dowry as alleged by Nisha nor of Abduction as alleged Crl. Writ Petition No.1703 of 2010 3 by Petitioner, therefore both the complaints were consigned to record room. The search for Sunny is still in progress. The appropriate action will be taken on the recovery of Sunny.” Thus, the matter has been duly inquired into and it was found that it was not a case of demand of dowry as alleged by Nisha nor it was a case of abduction as alleged by the petitioner Narinder Kumar Mittal. In these circumstances, no further interference by this Court is made out. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (SABINA) October 28, 2010 JUDGE Anand