IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4618 of 2006 DINESH PRASAD SINGH SON OF LATE MANRAKHI PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O. NEWARI, P.S. MAKDUMPUR, DISTRICT- JEHANABAD. …. PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 3. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, JEHANABAD. 5. THE SUBDIVISIONAL OFFICER, JEHANABAD. 6. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, MAKDUMPUR, DISTRICT- JEHANABAD. 7. THE AREA MANAGER, IRCON INTERNATIONAL CONSTRUCTION A.P. COLONY, GAYA, P.S. RAMPUR, DISTRICT- GAYA. 8. SITE INCHARGE, IRCON INTERNATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, BLOCK COMPOUND R.E.O. OFFICE, BUILDING, JEHANABAD. … RESPONDENTS. For the Petitioner : Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate. For the Union of India :Mr. P.L. Jaiswal (C.G.C.) For the State : Mr. Chhotelal Narayan Singh, SC-1 ----------- 16. 30.11.2010. In compliance of the orders of this Court dated 1.9.2006 passed in the instant case Collector, Jehanabad visited the lands alleged to have been encroached upon by the authorities for digging out soil as also for widening of the road and having got the lands in question measured in his presence as also in presence of the petitioner submitted report dated 4.1.2007, Annexure-A to the supplementary affidavit that neither the lands in question has been encroached nor soil has been dug nor the statue of the father of the 2 petitioner erected over the lands in question alongwith the three trees have been damaged while filling soil and widening the road adjacent to the lands in question. In view of the report of the Collector submitted in compliance of the orders of this Court, I do not find any merit in the petition which is, accordingly, dismissed. Ibrar/- ( V.N. Sinha, J.)