IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18121 of 2009 NAJRUN NISHA WIFE OF LATE ANUL HODA, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA NEW AJIMABAD P.O. MAHENDRU P.S. SULTANGANJ, DISTRICT PATNA Versus 1. THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER BUDH MARG, PATNA. 2. THE TOWN COMMISSIONER, (PMC) PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDH MARG, PATNA -1. 3. THE CHIEF ACCOUNT OFFICER, (PMC) PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDH MARG, PATNA -1. 4. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PATNA CITY ANCHAL P.MC. ----------- 02. 22.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent – Corporation. The grievance of the petitioner is that except family pension, other terminal dues of her husband has not been settled as yet as indicated in paragraph – 6 of the writ petition. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent – Corporation submits that in case petitioner files a representation stating the details of her claims, the same would be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of her claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 2 enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of such claim 2 along with certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks from today. In case such representation is filed, the respondent no. 2 shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievance of the petitioner could be settled and the admitted dues if any could also be paid with statutory interest without delay. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)