THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.18491 of 2009 DATE:03.09.2009 Between: M. Narsimhulu ... Petitioner and The Station House Officer, Shankarpalli Police Station, Rangareddy District and another ... Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.18491 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of 1st respondent in investigating into the complaint dated 14.07.2009 given by him, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that he is the owner and possessor of an agricultural land of an extent of Ac.5.00 in Sy.No.319 of Singapur village, Shankerpally Mandal, Rangareddy District. With regard to the said property, there is a civil dispute pending between him and the 2nd respondent in O.S.No.513 of 2008 on the file of the 1st Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B. Nagar. Challenging the dismissal of I.A.No.1593 of 2008 filed along with the said suit, he filed C.M.A.No.1599 of 2008 before this Court and this Court directed both the parties to maintain status quo, by an order dated 13.12.2008 in C.M.A.M.P.No.2911 of 2008. However, the 2nd respondent tresspassed into his land by disobeying the orders of this Court. Therefore, he filed a private complaint before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chevella, Rangareddy district in C.C.Sr.No.667 of 2009 on 14.07.2009. The learned Magistrate, in turn, referred the complaint to the 1st respondent for investigation and report within one month. But, the 1st respondent has not yet started investigation into the complaint. Aggrieved by the same, he filed the present writ petition. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home. 4. When the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chevella, Rangareddy District referred the complaint dated 14.07.2009 of the petitioner to the 1st respondent for investigation and report within one month, If the petitioner has any grievance, he may approach the very same court and file an application before him but not the writ petition before this Court. Therefore, I see no merits in this writ petition. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chevella, Rangareddy District and file an application for redressal of his grievance, if he so chooses. No costs. _________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 3rd September, 2009 CBS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.18491 of 2009 (Dismissed) 3rd September, 2009 CBS