Crl. Misc. No.M-2003 of 2011 (O&M) Naveen Vs. State of Haryana Present : Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, A.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate for the complainant. ******* This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case F.I.R. No.610 dated 25.06.2009 registered under Sections 302, 212, 34, 120-B IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act at Police Station Sadar, Hisar. On 21.01.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.07.2010 and has been roped in only as a conspirator (who allegedly gave information that the deceased had left).” Learned Assistant Advocate General on instructions from ASI Joginder Singh has accepted these factual assertions. Learned counsel for the complainant has however argued that the petitioner is a key member of the conspiracy. Be that as it may, this fact is yet to be proved. In my opinion, in case the petitioner is found guilty during trial he would be liable for whatever punishment imposed upon him. Crl. Misc. No.M-2003 of 2011 (O&M) -2- In the circumstances, without going into the merit of the case, I deem it appropriate to release the petitioner on regular bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Ordered accordingly. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) July 22, 2011 JUDGE ashish