smaLE 3mm Q) 1N THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c.G.) w. P. (C) No.§Vz9 % of 2011 ETITIONER/ : /J/ayant Infratech Private Limited, Appellant through the Director, Nilesh Jobanputra, aged about 41 years, S/o Shri Kanti Lal Jobanputra, R/o Mangal Smriti, Bajpai Ground, Tilak Nagar, Bilaspur, District—Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS :1./ South Eastern Central Railway, through the General Manager, Headquarters Office Bilaspur (C.G.) RTS ESPONDEN Commission, through the m “5063 Registrar, Club Building Old JNU Campus, New Delhi. Mil 2 . The Central Information ,a 3/ R.K. Solanki, Electrical Supplier 8a Contractor, Subhashpara, Bhatapara, District-Raipur (C.G.) \ 4. r“ The Public Information Officer/Deputy General Manager (G) South East Central Railway, Bilaspur (C.G.) 5/ The Public Information 85 CE/ Con/III/ South East Central Railway, Bilaspur (C.G.) Offlcer Officer/ Nodal WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ,\ P HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO.5498 OF 2011 PETITION ER/ Jayant Infratech Private Limited Appellant Versus RESPONDENTS South Eastern Central Railway & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Prateek Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Abhishek Sinha, Advocate for the respondents No1 & 2. Shri Prakash Mishra, Advocate for the respondent No.3. ORDER (Passed on this 8% day of November, 201 1) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that with the passage of time the petition has become infructuous. 2. No objection from other side. 3. It is ordered, as prayedfor. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- t SATISH K. ANGNIHORI Judge “‘«mwmMwMEKmN 7 w N