I1'.•l»n In the Honble High Court of Chhattishgarh at Bilasour (.C. G.l -s8- W.F..No,No......................•t?..^-:............. :A !la K Lx-<l°s- r.^.1—-;'^ ^^0---'::SCS^S&J^' 1^^^ S^.---^ datett-- Petitioner Saroj Prasad aged 61 years son oflate Shri Ram Keshar Singl^Head Master, Middle School Village Golkumhada, Block Charama District Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS Respondent ^- -V ,0^ . e> ^g^ c^w^s 1. State ofChhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department Minisfay, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, (Madhya Bastar), Jagdalpur (C.G.) 3. Principal, T.W.D., Govt. Model Higher Secondary School, Pharasgaon, Block Kontagaon, District Bastar, Jagdalpur (C.G.) 4. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Kanker (C.G.) 5. Block Education Of&cer, Tribal Welfare Deptt., Charama District Kankker. Writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance ofwrit in the nature ofmandamys certiorarL, prohibition and for other suitable writ/writs, order/orders, and direction/directions. XI-HC-22 •s'g xii^itrt'y, tiifl'yir<s, f^aresT Sfl^I^I Ki-ii?i> sn^t s^J4f^ -ylfia Gowri ^..^ ^1 ^ 3TI^I ¥;S?[WHft^ 5-1-200e graht of increment to the petition It is pointed out that representation t6 the State of C; | titioner has submitted his la^ Madhya Pradesh has notjoined ^rqi^T-41'1 ^I*^T ^ ^St ^3lPtiH3TI^T ShriR.S.Shrivastaya.coijinselforttepetltioner. Shri S.S. Raiput, Panel L^wyer for the Stat®. Heard. Leamed counsel for the [telitioner submits ttiat ttie matter relates to 6r. the petiUoner has n<rt submitted any ;hhattisgarh. is alsopointed out that the .t representation before the authorities on 18-3-1^8 (Annexure-P/4) i.e. b^fore reorganization, which ishighly bdated and thepet'rtion deservesto befltsmissed. It is also noted thal the State of as party/respondent in Uie instant petition. At this stage,learned coi^isel appearing for the petitionerstates that he may be permitted to make re^resentation tp the authoritles cpncerned. Notopposed. | Since counsel tor th^ petiUoner himself wants to submit representation, he may submit (he same before the competent authorities and on such representation bepng filed by the petitioner, the competent authorities may decide the repr^sentation on its own merits in accordance withlaw. I With the aforesaid obsero^tions, this petitionstaads disposed of. Certified copyas per rule4 Sdf- Fakhruddin Judge [^^fig^