IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34272 of 2010 VIJAY YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.09.10. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 18.08.2010 in a case registered under Sections 324 and 307 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that the victim was injured in the marriage of sister of one Ashok Yadav when he found some bleeding injury near his right thigh. The firing was made by some unknown persons hence, the F.I.R. was registered against unknown. During investigation, it was alleged that it was firing of the petitioner which hit the victim. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there was no intentional firing since in the marriage firing was made by several persons hence, it can not be ascertained as whose firing hit the victim. Moreover, the injury report suggests the injury of a marginal size. It is further submitted that though the petitioner is involved in three other cases but he is on bail in all those three 2 cases. Considering the circumstance of the occasion of marriage when the victim received the injury and the nature of injury, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Jehanabad, in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No. 60 of 2010. In view of serious criminal antecedent, the learned trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner if the petitioner gets involved in similar nature of offence and he fails to appear on three consecutive dates during trial. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)