THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1760 OF 2008 6th august, 2009 Between: S.RAJU .. PETITIONER V. STATE OF A.P. .. RESPONDENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1760 OF 2008 O R D E R : This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order dated 3.11.2008 passed in Crl.M.P.No.703 of 2008 in C.C.No.6065 of 2006 on the file of I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, whereby and whereunder the learned Magistrate dismissed the application filed by the petitioner under section 239 Cr.P.C. This revision came to be admitted on 28-11-2008. Subsequently the petitioner moved Crl.M.P.No.2398 of 2008 with a prayer to stay of all further further proceedings in C.C.No.6065 of 2006. When the stay application came up for consideration, with the consent of both the parties, revision itself has been taken up for final disposal. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that even if the statements of L.Ws.2 to 4 have been considered no offence has been made out against the petitioner and therefore the trial court committed error in dismissing the application filed by the petitioner under section 239 of Cr.P.C. A further submission has been made that sanction is required to prosecute the accused for the offence under section 12(1)(b) of the Pass Ports Act, 1967 and as there being no proper sanction to prosecute the accused under section 12(1)(b) of the Pass Ports Act, 1967 the proceedings relatable to that charge is liable to be quashed. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor supported the order impugned in the revision. The accusation made against the petitioner is that he collected the passports from L.W.2, L.W.3 and L.W.4 to arrange VISA to USA and undertook to procure necessary bank statements and other documents. L.W.1, Sri.K.M.Kiran Singh, SI of Police, State Task Force, North Zone surprised the premises of the petitioner and seized incriminating material. The incriminating material seized from the premises in occupation of the petitioner suggests of their being used in preparation of fake documents. Indeed the bank statements that have been seized from the premises of the petitioner are found to be fake. The trial Court considered these aspects and proceeded to dismiss the application. I do not see any illegality or irregularity warranting interference of this court in exercise of the powers conferred under sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. 6th August, 2009. (B.Seshasayana Reddy,J) tnb THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1760 OF 2008 6th August, 2009.