HIGH C01 IRT OF CHHAT’I‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 3318 ofZGO‘) PE'I‘I’HONER : Asgax Ali S/o Shri Saiyad Ahamed Ali, Aged APPLICANT about 35 years, R/o C-18, Sector — 5, Devendra Nagar Raipur, Tahsil & District aipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary Transport Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) '2. Regional Trarispof: Authority, D.K,S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTIGN OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agniliotri, .l. P esent: Shxi Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the yetitioner. Shri Amn Sao, Governmem Advocate for the State/responéents. ORDER GRAL {Passeé on 13 day of July, 2009) Heayd learned caunsel for the parties. Leamed counse] appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage. However, the respondent-authorities may be directed to consider and decide his pending, application dated 24.4.2009 (Annexure P/l) in accordance with law, on. its own merits, as expeditiously as possible. Shri Sao, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State/respondents submits that there is no reason asto why the representation of the petitioner, as stated above should not be considered expeditiously. Shri Sao submits that the above-stated representation shall be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of four week from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. in View of the clear statement made by learned counsei appearing for the respondents, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing remains to be adjudicated. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/— ‘. Satish K.Agnihntri l; . Judge R ‘