IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 12943 OF 2008 DATE OF DECISION: November 14, 2008. Parties Name M. Kumar ..PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Haryana and others ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH Present: Mr. Neeraj Gaur, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Rameshwar Malik, Addl. A.G., Haryana for respondents No., 1 to 6. Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate, for respondent No. 7. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? T.S.THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE (oral) JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case he is permitted to file a suitable representation before the District Collector, Gurgaon, making grievance regarding the alleged tampering and fabrication of the official record by respondent No. 5 – Sub Divisional Magistrate, Gurgaon. He submits that this Court could CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 12943 OF 2008 -2- direct the Collector to look into the said representation and take appropriate action in accordance with law. Counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection to that course of action being followed. In the circumstances, we direct that in case the petitioner files a suitable representation before the District Collector, Gurgaon, the latter shall examine the same and if necessary, hold an enquiry into allegations made therein and take appropriate action in accordance with law expeditiously but not later than four months from the date the complaint is filed. This petition is disposed of leaving the parties to bear their own costs. ( T.S.THAKUR) CHIEF JUSTICE (JASBIR SINGH) November 14, 2008. JUDGE DKC