IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 8272 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 09th December, 2011. Kiran Bala Petitioner through Mr. Amit Rana, Advocate Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Respondents through Mr. R.D.Sharma, DAG, Haryana. Mr. GPS Bal, Advocate, for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner appeared in the School Teachers' Eligibility Test conducted by the Board of School Education, Haryana and failed to get 50% eligibility marks. Besides questioning the answers of some of the objective type questions of the said examination, the petitioner also seeks grace marks claiming parity with other similarly placed candidates. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the records. It is well settled that an examiner is the master of the answer-key prepared for an objective type question paper and the Courts, for want of expertise, are not expected to pronounce their own view in relation thereto. No case to interfere with the impugned result on the first count is made out. As regard to the grace-marks, suffice it to observe that in case some grace-marks have been awarded to the similarly placed candidates, there might not be any rhyme or reason to treat the petitioner differently. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities of the Board of School Education, Haryana to consider the petitioner's request sympathetically for the grant of grace-marks and pass appropriate orders within a period of two weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is received. Disposed of. Dasti. December 09, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE