IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 233 OF 2008 FROM ORDER NO. 233 OF 2008 FROM ORDER NO. 233 OF 2008 WITH WITH WITH CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 283 APPLICATION NO. 283 APPLICATION NO. 283 OF 2008 OF 2008 OF 2008 MILIND MADHUSUDAN SAKHALKAR ..APPELLANT V/S THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GR. BOMBAY. ..RESPONDENTS Mr. B.P. Shukla, Advocate, for the appellant. Mrs. Geeta Joglekar, Advocate, for the Respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: DATE: DATE: 17th March, 2008. 17th March, 2008. 17th March, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The plaintiff - appellant filed a suit challenging the notice under section 351 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act and took out a Notice of Motion No. 485 of 2008 for restraining the Respondent from enforcing the notice. The trial court refused ad- : 2 : interim relief. Therefore, the plaintif has preferred the present Appeal. The Respondent - Bombay Municipal Corporation has not filed the reply to the said notice of motion. The learned counsel for the respondent seeks time of about 3 weeks to file reply. In view of the above circumstances, the Appeal may be disposed of with the followig directions:- 2. The Respondent shall file reply to the notice of motion within 3 weeks from this day and the trial court shall hear and dispose of the notice of motion within 3 weeks thereafter. The parties shall maintain status quo till then. Appeal stands disposed of accordingly. 3. As Appeal itself is disposed of, the Civil Application does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)