1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. Civil Application No. 7127 of 2005 (Ramkrishna Vithuji Nimkar Vs. Sahebrao Marotirao Nimkar) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. M.I. Khan h/f Mr. N.S. Bhattad, Adv. for the applicant. CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATE : 7 th September, 2007 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. None appears on behalf of the non-applicant though served. However, the non-applicant has filed reply to the civil application. Perused the contents of the civil application as well as the reply. The applicant has produced voluminous documents to show that the applicant was suffering from serious ailment during the relevant period and at the same time, the wife and son of the applicant were also operated some time in March, 2005 and June, 2005. The documents which are in the form of the medical bills as well as the medical certificates clearly show that the appellant and his family members were suffering from ailments during the relevant 2 period. The applicant has shown sufficient cause for condoning the delay caused in filing the second appeal. Civil application is, therefore, allowed. Delay is condoned. C.A. is disposed of. JUDGE RMP