IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.32352 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 09, 2011 Karamjeet Kaur & another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Ashutosh Vig, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. None had appeared for the petitioners on 21.10.2011 and the case was adjourned for today. The counsel for the petitioners today points out that petitioner Karamjeet Kaur is in the illegal custody of respondent Nos.4 to 6. At this stage, Mr.Swarn Tiwana, Advocate appears on behalf of the private respondents and points out that petitioner Karamjeet Kaur is now with her parents and is present in the Court. I have spoken to Karamjeet Kaur. She has disclosed that she is voluntarily staying with her parents. She further points out that she was forced to marry petitioner No.2 Gulsharan Pal Singh by putting her under a fear that petitioner No.2 is having her few snaps and in case she refuses to marry him, he would publish these photographs in Newspaper. This would indicate that petitioner No.2 has blackmailed petitioner No.1 in forcing her to marry him. It was not a voluntary Criminal Misc.-M No.32352 of 2011 (O&M) : 2 : marriage. Petitioner No.1 was forced to succumb to the wishes of petitioner No.2. No case for grant of protection in this case is made out. The police is directed to look into the mater and in case any cognizable offence is made out to register a case against petitioner No.2 for having performed this marriage in an illegal manner. Petitioner No.2 has to account for his illegal act. The present petition is accordingly dismissed. November 09, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE