IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.804 OF 1998 Ashwin Namdeo Ingole .. Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.K.M.Sangani for the appellant. Ms.A.T.Jhaveri, A.P.P for the respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. : A.S.OKA, J. : A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 10th February 2009. : 10th February 2009. : 10th February 2009. P.C.: . This appeal against order of conviction is by the accused no.1 who was convicted for offence punishable under section 392 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 394 read with section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. For the first offence he was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for four years and to pay a fine of Rs.300/-. In default, he was directed to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two months. For the second offence he was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay fine of Rs.500/-. In default he was directed to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months. The record shows that the applicant was arrested on 18th June 1996 and he was (2) not granted bail. At the time of admission of the appeal bail was denied to the applicant. Thus, it is an accepted position that the applicant has undergone entire substantive sentence as well as sentence in default of payment of fine. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant stated that after the prayer for bail was rejected, the appellant has not instructed him. He stated that even after undergoing the entire sentence, the appellant has not instructed him. 3. In view of the statement and in view of the fact that the applicant has already undergone sentence, the appeal is disposed of. (A.S.Oka,J)