SK ^S^^iflis3^^^^^^ ?^:^;IMl?';!^?^^@^ai^it!^^N K- '•-^.:^:'.' W^XKW<mCQIVm'C 3GE^^UI CmWTFX&QSSQ[l AfBlLASNJiL —-~~ WritPrtitionNo.23^ /2002 •s •'su sSM SSM Pstitioner Versus Steei Authority ofIndiaLtd., BhilaiSteeIPlant,Bhilai Through the Maa^ing Djrector, Tehsil & Distfc Ourg (Chhattisgarh). Responsents ^^!^^/ ^>^v ^.<^ 2. Bhageshwar S/o Varen Bagh, Shipping Hnid, P. No. 894698, Rail Structursl MiM, Bhilai Stee] Plaat, Bhilai, R/o Qr.No. l-A.Street-32A, Sector-10,BhiIai, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh). Indnstrial Conrt Raipur, Krishna Sadaa,16,HIG,Shaaka' N^ar, Raipur(C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226^7 OF THE CONSTITVION OF INDIA. ®K- i %'. ..,A^' •f^f^'' f'-^^ HJGH COURT QF CHHAJTiSGARH : BiLASPU! 'A'RiT PET!T!ON N0. 2357 OF 2002 9»of 11> RESPONDENTS Mversus Bhaaeshwar & Another CWrit Petitlon under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Sinaie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Aignihoiri, J. Present:- Shri Goutam Bhaduri, Advocafe for the petifioner. Shri Pradeep Saxena, Advocate for the respondents (Passed on this 05s" day of August, 2011) Learned counse! appearing for frie parties submits thai the dispute involved in'this matter has been settied amscabtv outside'the Court. Thus. nothing survives for adjudication in this petltion and the getition mav fae disposed of in terms of the joint aepiication fiied by the Barties. in view of She submlssion made by the learned counsel appesring t'or the parties, this petitjon is disposed of in terms of the appllcation fited bv the oarties. A coov of the settiement Annexure-2 shai! form a c'art of fhis order. . -—"—- ___. No order asto costs. c, .. . _'-'"'- Judge "SiG^: