IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2010 / 20TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 23036 of 2010(D) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- P.K.UMMER, S/O. ABDHU, PARUTHIKUNNAN HOUSE, KARIMINTHODI, VADAKKUMPADAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAKESH ROSHAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. KERALA STATE DELIMITATION COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. KERALA STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM. 4. WANDOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, WANDOOR, MALAPPURAM. *ADDL. R5 IMPLEADED: 5. A.G. UMMEN, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O. A.O. GEORGE, IKKATTUKUNNEL, NADUVATH.P.O., WANDOOR. *ADDL. R5 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 06/08/2010 IN I.A. NO.10815/10. R1 & R2 BY SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN,SC, R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. N. SUDHA DEVI, ADDL. R5 BY ADVS. SRI.M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, SRI.JYOTHISH.J.KALLINGAL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/08/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.23036/2010-D: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE PROPOSED MAP OF THE WANDOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE CONSTITUENCY DELIMITATION REPORT OF THE WARD ISSUED BY THE R.4. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE CONSTITUENCY DELIMITATION REPORT OF THE WARD ISSUED BY THE R.4. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE OBJECTION AND PROPOSAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURE: ANNEXURE-A: COPY OF THE LETTER NO. P3-54588/09 DTD. 20/07/2010 OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THE R.2. TO THE R.1. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.23036/2010-D ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 11th day of August, 2010 J U D G M E N T Herein the petitioner's objection against the proposals for delimitation is in respect of Ward Nos.II and III of the Wandoor Grama Panchayat. Ext.P4 is the copy of the objection submitted by the petitioner. According to the petitioner, the natural boundary shown in the draft proposal, namely, Kuthirapuzha as eastern boundary of Ward No.II is not correct. It is prayed that the said matter may be examined by the Commission before finalising the delimitation of wards. 2. The respondents have filed a statement and at paragraph No.6 it is mentioned that the discrepancy projected by the petitioner has been taken up with the Village Officer, who is also the Enquiry Officer and found that the Map of the Grama Panchayat was not in consistent with the narrations in Annexure 5 and 2A and that after realising the exact position, the Map has been corrected as Railway line as the Eastern boundary of Ward No.II. 3. It is pointed out by the learned Standing Counsel for the Commission that hearing on the objections are over and the objections of the petitioner will also be W.P.(C). No.23036/2010 -:2:- considered. It is upto the Commission to consider the objections in accordance with the guidelines and the writ petition is accordingly, disposed of. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms