CWP No. 9317 of 2006 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 9317 of 2006 Date of decision: September 17, 2008 Renu Bala --- Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ---- Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashutosh Mohunta Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta Present: Mr. SS Toor, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG, Punjab, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Sukhjinder Singh, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. Ashutosh Mohunta, J (Oral. Petitioner prays for issuance of a direction to the respondents to consider her application for appointment to the post of ETT teacher. She had applied for the said post in pursuance of the advertisement Annexure P1. In the reply filed on behalf of respondents No.2 & 3, it has been averred that on a direction issued by this Court, the application form of the petitioner was provisionally accepted, but she could not be selected because the lowest merit in her category had CWP No. 9317 of 2006 2 a score of 123.21, whereas she had secured a score of only 95.10. Counsel for respondents No.2 & 3 submits that the case of the petitioner could also not be considered because she had secured only 95.10, i.e. less than the minimum prescribed score of 100. Thus on both the counts, the petitioner was not eligible to be selected as ETT teacher. There is no merit in the present writ petition. The same is hereby dismissed. [Ashutosh Mohunta] Judge [Rajan Gupta] Judge September 17, 2008 `ask'