IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.8835 OF 2008 VIJAY SHANKAR SINGH, SON OF SRI RAGHUBAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHAMHA, POLICE STATION MUFASSIL BEGUSARAI, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI. AT PRESENT PRESIDENT, KHAMHAR PACS, BEGUSARAI VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SHIV KUMAR SINGH, SON OF LATE BANARSI SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHAMHAR, POLICE STATION MUFASSIL, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI ……………………………………………………………………..OPPOSITE PARTIES ********* 2 18/02/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner has challenged the orders dated 21.04.2007 & 16.07.2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Begusarai and the Sessions Judge, Begusarai in Complaint Case No. 1226 C of 2005 and Criminal Revision No. 141 of 2007 respectively. A complaint case was filed in which the complainant had named certain witnesses in support of his case. The complainant was able to produce two witnesses to support the complaint petition. On 01.12.2006 and 20.01.2007, applications were filed praying therein that the complainant may be permitted to examine two witnesses who were not named in the complaint petition. The Court has rejected the application on the ground that these witnesses are not concerned with the allegations made in the complaint petition and they have not been arrayed as witnesses in 2 the complaint petition. Against the order rejecting the application, the petitioner preferred revision which was also dismissed. There being two concurrent findings of the Courts below and the fact that the orders impugned have been passed giving good reasons for rejecting the application of the complainant, I see no reason to interfere with the impugned orders. This application is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)