IN THE. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA T BAmALCYZE DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY CF JUtE 1998 BEForE THE HONHLt. >IR.JUST1CE P VISHWkNAT9 SHSTTY 410 1994 BETWEEN: Narasintha Reddy, sb Rarnappa, MaJ or, Agricul turist, na Yeramareddyhali I, Pa,a Thimmanahalli, Post, Chikakalnapur Hobli CI-intarnani Taluk, Kolar dist ..Petitioriez ( ant, Ginija Shankar) 1, State of Karnataka, Rep, by its Seer taw to Govt., Dent, of Revenue, 9.5 ,Buiiding, Dr,B,R,Ambedkar Veedhi, Barxiaiore.O1 2, The Dy,Cornrnission’r, Koir di t, KxzIa r, , , . , , , 2 /2/ 3 The Ast Commissioner, Chickhaballaour sub—divn. Chickha.bal I aur 1 Kajar dist, 4, Sri Muniyappa, s/o Nagappa, aged major, Agriculturist 1 r/o Kuttapoanahalli, Chilakainapur Hobli, Chintamani tk, Kolar dist, ,,Respondents (By Sri R Vittal Shetty for R4 Sri B E Kotian Addi HCGA for R 1—3) W,P filed u/a 226 & 227 of the Constitutó.n of Ir1ia with an affidavit praying to: direct the respondents 1 to 3 to dispose of the application filed by the petitioner for grant of la1 ar direct the A.C,, to pass an order on the basis of AnnexA before taking further steps in pursuance of the dIrection issued by this Hon’ble Court ar etc., W,P coming on for Prly,Hg this day, the Court made the foflowing ORDER Sri Girija Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be dismissed as hav!ng become infructuous. in , . . .3 ‘3, In the light of the said submission, this p°tition is dismissing as having become infructuous, Sd/- Judge, Cu r.byj \2k cop? c,by; Aa built Repi wet VIP Co oftaiktakl C’ 1k oêSO°1 (f7 1’ I \ ;Y —