1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 235 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 235 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 235 OF 2006 M/s. Avadh Associates ... Petitioner Versus Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. and Anr. ... Respondents Mr. Jayesh Bhatt for Petitioner. Ms. Swati Deshpande i/by M.S. Bodhanwala & Co. for R. No. 1. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : APRIL 13, 2006 DATED : APRIL 13, 2006 DATED : APRIL 13, 2006 P.C. . The matter was adjourned on the last occasion as the learned counsel has made a statement that the work order will be issued. It is in these circumstances that the matter was adjourned. Today when the matter comes up, the learned counsel states that the Officers are not issuing the work order. . The issue as to whether the work order to be issued or not is within the discretion of the respondents. If the Petitioner is aggrieved for 2 not giving him the work order or giving the same to anybody else, the remedy is way of damages. It is not for the writ court to interfere in extra ordinary jurisdiction. Hence, Petition rejected. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)