C- P (sro ? IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARH) W.P. (S) No.l 5/)^7 f2009 PETITIONER Ku. Laxrai Udde, D/o. Late Jogiram Udde, aged about 38 years, working o^'*<-^y asAsst. Teacher, Mata Rukhmani S^<5;?^A/'* ^•'^v Kanya Ashram Dhanora at Bijapur, ,.••;..-• .^ ^^^ :>-.'':\iS,^''' /C'' y -.'"\u,^'' ^•^.^y ,•'' ^y".\^^) ^>v^ \^' RESPONDENTS Tahsil & Distt. Bijapur (C.G.) VERSUS ^^" (1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of school Examiniation, Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) The Director, Directorate of C.G.PubUc Education Department, Raipiir (C.G.) (3) The Dista-ict Education Officer, Office of District Edycation Officer, Distt. Bijapur (C.G.) (4) The Commissioner, Tribal Development, Raipur (C.G.j (5) Mata Rukamani Sewa Sansthan Saiiuti, thr. Its Secretary, Mata Rukariiani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dinirapal Tahsil 85 Distt. Jagdalpiu' (C,G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The Peddoner named above most respectfully submitted as'under: - 1. •PARTICULAR OF THE PETITIONERS As shown in the cause title. COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH ; BiLASPUR l,^???iT OG;T!TI?N'ihJ./^ h\i '<! t I^S^ ! i i i^P^ i&.f P^ s85 OF 20GS l?:T! IONER RESPONDENTS l-^ t a i' *^t^/B**^t I i^*| ^J/\ s\u. i-aAiiii i»?y^4c VSFSU3 State of Chhattissarh & Others o. Tumans iWrit petmon under Artide 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench: Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. snt: - Shri Vinod Deshmumkh, counsel forthe petitioners. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Psne! Lawyerforthe State. >"ll )Si (Passed on this.24 day'of November, 2009) With the consent of iearned counsei sppearing for ihe p^rties, the pstition is heard finaHy. , Learned counsel appearing for the pstitioner sUbmits that the instant petitton is squareiy covered by the eiecisipn of this Court i-endered inSmt. A. LaU v. State ofChhattisgarh & Others1, thus the petitioner may be permitted So maks a representafion to iecide hsr case in the light of afore-stated decision, subject to veriflegtion astc. whether tho respondent No.5 institute is a Qovernment aided schoo! and the petitioner is the teacher within the sanctionsd strenath. Learned counsei appearsng for the State event, the petltioner mskes a representstion, considered and declded, in accordance v/ith iits that In the same wiii be aw, within a period -.-ib-^ •?! *<ii. *T.'? ya OT rour weess trom the aate o'r recespt of ths in view of foregoing, according to'the iearned counsel appearing for the petit'oner,' nothing suwives in this petition for adiudication. Accordinigiv, the writ petition is disDosed of. -: Sd/- SatisfaK.Agnihotri ' 2007 (1)BLJ 265 Uli