1 HIGH COUR‘f OF CHHATT SGARH: BRLASPUR 1 i 4 :Per etiticn ‘ $ I E ‘ i i v i Regpondent 1 ‘ i 4 ; § 2 I 1 9 i . x . \ , I ‘ Wfit Petition No. 34$ 0f 2094 N§rmaia fadav, Wl’o. Raj Kumar Yaciav,‘ aged abcu’: 32 years, Sarpanch. Giam Panchayét Eharari, 'E'ehsii and District BilaspuH Versus 1. The Staté of Chhamsgarh, through the Director § Danchayat, Chhattisgarh, Raiphr, ’1‘ehslii anti District Raipur (CG). The Coilectcr Bikaspur, Tehsil and District Baaspu? (CG). 1 A J z : x {Wiit Petitéon under Amcie 226/22? of the Constitution of lndia.) SE: Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Pfesent: None for the petitioner. Shri Aiak Bakshi, Gevt. Advocate for the State' GRAL ORDER (Passed on this 16‘“ day o? Qcteber, 2008 ) The matter i5 caHed for hearing twi'ce. On both occasrons, rione ph-fears nor is any rgpre$entati0n made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. 2)é in View of ihe above, ine wrii petition is dismiesed for want of prosecution. Coneequentiy, M.{W)P.No.306 of 20U4 stamis disposed of. ‘ x m M; ,2 . h sat K,‘A§‘iho“i i 53 i 3“&ge 'i X I z §is r