IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 23318 of 1999 Between: Nirmal Toys & Arts Industrial Coop. Society Ltd., Regd .No. 21140 rep by its Secretary, Sri N.Satyanarayana, H.H.7, Nirmal-504 106, Adilabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of A.P., rep by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and road Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director and Town Country Planning Government of A.P., B.R.K.R.Bhavan, Tankbund road, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner, Nirmal Municipal Council, Nirmal, Addilabad District. 4 The Collector, Adilabad District, Adilabad. 5 The Dy. Executive Engineer, N.H. 7, Division, R & B Department, Nirmall, Adilabad District. 6 G.Rajeswar Reddy, S/o. Narasa Reddy, R/o. 7-3-23, Nirmal. Adilabad District. 7 G.Jagan Mohan Reddy, S/o. G.Rajeswar Reddy, R/o. H.No. 7-3-23/A, Nirmal. Adilabad District. 8 G.Raja Gangamma, W/o.Late G.Rajaswar Reddy, R/o. 2-2-117, Sai Krishna Enclave, Tilak Nagar, Nalla Kunta, Hyderabad. 9 G.Vijayakumar Reddy, S/o.Late G.Rajeswar Reddy, R/o. 2-2-117, Sai Krishna Enclave, Tilak Nagar, Nalla Kunta, Hyderabad. 10 G.Satyakumar Reddy, S/o.Late Rajeswar Reddy, R/o. 2-2-117, Sai Krishna Enclave, Tilak Nagar, Nalla Kunta, Hyderabad. (Respondents 8 to 10 are impleaded s per Court Order in W.P.M.P.No.30567 of 2002 dated 10.12.2000) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring Memo No. 8773/Q1/99-3/MA dated 29-7-99 issued by the 1st respondent as void and illegal and contrary to provisions of A.P. town Planning Act and hold the same as unimplementable as otherwise, the petitioner is put to grave and irreparable loss. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.HARI HARAN (Not present) Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 4: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER: The writ petition is an old matter coming high up in the list. Though the list was circulated to the learned counsel on Sunday i.e. 12.09.2004, none appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. There is no representation. The writ petition is therefore dismissed for default/non-prosecution. ___________ (V.V.S.RAO,J) 14.09.2004. pln ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Principal Secretary, Government of A.P., Municipal Administration and Road Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Director and Town and Country Planning, Government of A.P., B.R.K.R.Bhavan, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. 3. The Commissioner, Nirmal Municipal Council, Nirmal, Adilabad dist. 4. The Collector, Adilabad District, Adilabad. 5. The Deputy Executive Engineer, N.H.7, Division, R&B Department, Nirmal, Adilabad District. 6. 2 CCs to the G.P.for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 7. 2 CD copies.