IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7942 of 2007 KAMLESH KUMAR ROY, SON OF SRI BINDESHWAR ROY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JITWARPUR KUMIHIRA, P.S. SARAI RANJAN, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR…………………………………………………PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PATNA 2. THE INCHARGE OF PANCHAYAT SHIKSHA MITRA, STATE PLANNING OFFICER, BIHAR EDUCATION PROJECT, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SAMASTIPUR 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER-CUM-DISTRICT PLANNING CO-ORDINATOR, ALL EDUCATION PROJECT, SAMSTIIPUR 5. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, SARAI RANJAN, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR 6. BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER-CUM-BLOCK RESOURCE CENTRE CO-ORDINATOR, ALL EDUCATION PROJECT SARAI RANJAN, 7. THE CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT COUNCILOR EDUCATION COMMITTEE, SAMASTIPUR 8. RAMA NAND SINGH, MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT, JITWARPUR, KUMIHIRA SARAI RANJAN, SAMASTIPUR 9. THE SECRETARY OF THE JITWARPUR GRAM PANCHAYAT, KUMIHIRA SARAI RANJAN, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR 10. NISHANT KUMAR NILABH, SON OF KAMESHWR JHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O. JITWARPUR, KUMIHIRA, P.S. SARAI RANJAN, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR 11. THE MEMBER OF SUKH SUBIDHA SAMITTI, GRAM PANCHAYAT JITWARPUR KUMIHARA, P.S. SARAI RANJAN, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR……………RESPONDENTS ----------- 2. 15.09.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State informs this Court that now Appellate Authorities constituted by the State Government under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Prarambhik Shikshak (Niyojan Avam Seva Sart) Niyamvali, 2006 are - 2 - functional and are now efficacious alternative forums available to the petitioner and others for consideration of their grievances. In view of the submissions of the learned counsels and in view of the availability of the efficacious alternative forum, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the concerned Authority, if not already filed, for redressal of his grievances. In case such an application is filed by the petitioner, the Authority shall make all endeavours to dispose of the same on its own merits by a speaking order preferably within the time prescribed under the Rules for the purpose. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)