IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR _ ‘ Smgh wtm MISC. CIVIL APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 CPC M.A.NO. 474‘ OF 2005 "" KHAIRAGARH, DISTRICT RAJNANDGAON (C.G.). gacTmN 41"; (3?: TH ISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPEAL UNDER QRDER43—RUEE—F W LwAk‘Dmw A xii) wxwv; 4c » 1303 V, iArlSlng out of order dated 17 2 2005 passed by Shn Shalad Gupta VAdd1t1onal D1str1ct Judge Khalragarh 1n MJC No I0/2004 ) ‘ The appellant, being aggrieved by the above order, begs to brefer this miscellaneous Civil Appeal on the following amongst other grounds. S y/ // i/ g M APPELLANT/ : ‘LPUNARAM, S/o. PARASRAM YADAV, /NON—APPLICANT AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/0.BIJETALA, P/S. & TAHSIL ’ GHUMKA, DISTT RAINANDGAON (CG) ‘ ‘ VS RESPONDENT w, URMILA BAI, W/o. PUNARAM YADAV, “’APPLICANT$ AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/o. PAVANTARA P/s & TAHSIL m§ma .m..A.---I.\I./ ...... nit? ............ “29‘ amtm (W) f wwmm" a$§§§ 33.3. Hon’ble Shri Justice N.K. A arwal 22-01 .201 a a $hriAS Ansari counsel Learned counsei appear: g for ’rhe appeilam submits that by passage of time this appea! has ecome Infructuous ‘ Accordmgiy, the app miructuous Is ehsmlssed as has become in View cf above, M.(C).P. No.638/2005 stands vacated‘ ‘ AH the pending applicatio s stand dismisS/gdM/*M‘ Sd/— N.K. Agrawa‘ i Judge ‘ y \ “37,.”- “Mwe e f"