1 wp-8852-11.sxw dgm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8852 OF 2011 Union of India, through General Manager, Mumbai and ors. .... Petitioners vs Shri Velmani Chinnsamy Sanyasi .... Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Dere i/by Shri Rpiyanka Mahndiratta for the respondent. CORAM: D. K. DESHMUKH & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : December 08, 2011 P.C.: Heard. 2 By the order impugned, all that the CAT has done is that it has directed the Petitioner to consider the application made by the Respondent for appointment on compassionate ground. All the grounds are available to the Petitioner. The only direction which is required is that the application should be considered in accordance with law. If law permits, the Petitioner to reject the application on 2 wp-8852-11.sxw the ground that the elder brother’s application for the same relief was rejected and that order has not been challenged, the Petitioner will be at liberty to give such a ground. Of course, it will be open to the Respondent to challenge such an order if so advised. No interference is called for. Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (D. K. DESHMUKH,J.)