HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.428 OF 2004 JUDGMENT This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the Petitioner-Wife against order, dated 11-12-2003, passed by learned Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the trial of Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Cases-cum-Additional Family Court, Hyderabad in M.C. No.113 of 2002. 2. The petitioner herein filed the Maintenance Case against the first respondent (husband) herein claiming maintenance of Rs.5,000/- p.m. and Rs.1,000/- towards legal expenses in which it is claimed that she is the legally wedded wife of the first respondent and he was drunkard and drug addicted and harassed her to bring additional dowry of Rs.50,000/- from her parents and forcibly took 4 signatures on 4 white papers and sent her out of the house in June, 2002 and deserted her having means to maintain her and she is unable to maintain herself. 3. The respondent filed counter denying the allegations made in the petition and also contended that he gave Talaq to the petitioner on 06-06-2002 and the petitioner received Mehar and Iddat period maintenance of Rs.8,000/- from the office of Qazi on 17-08- 2002 and he was not liable to pay any maintenance and prayed to dismiss the petition. 4. During the course of trial, on behalf of respondent he got himself examined as RW.1 and got examined RW.2 and got marked Exs.R.1 to R.8. On behalf of the petitioner, she got herself examined as PW.1. No documents were marked on her behalf. 5. On a careful consideration of the entire evidence, the Court below by the impugned order held that the respondent gave Talaq to the petitioner and communicated same to her on 17-08-2002 on which date the petitioner is said to have received the said Mehar and Iddat period maintenance from the office of Qazi in the presence of her brother and cousin and further allowed the Maintenance Case in part, directing the respondent to pay further maintenance of Rs.6,000/- to the petitioner for the period from the date of petition i.e. 09-07-2002 to 17-08-2002, within one month from the date of order. Challenging the same, the Petitioner-Wife was approached this Court by filing this Criminal Revision Case. 6. Even though the matter is posted to today under the caption “For Orders” there is no representation on either side. 7. The point for consideration is whether the lower Court examined the matter properly and arrived at correct conclusions and whether its order is tenable or not? 8. I have gone through the record and I am of the opinion that the matter was disposed of by the lower Court on the basis of material available giving cogent and acceptable reasons, and there are no grounds to interfere with the order passed by the lower Court. 9. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed, while confirming the order, dated 11-12-2003, passed by the learned Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the trial of Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Cases-cum-Additional Family Court, Hyderabad in M.C. No.113 of 2002. __________________________ G. KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY, J 15th June, 2011. Dsh.