IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46551 of 2009 1. Mustakim 2. SHAKEEL 3. Mithu All sons of Md. Zabbar 4. Md.Zabbar, son of Late Suleman All resident of village-Majhauli Dharmdas,P.S.-Sadar,District-Muzaffarpur. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 05-04-2010 Heard Mr. Neeraj Kumar @ Sanidh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned counsel appearing for the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S.Case No.133 of 2009 dated 21-06-2009, registered under Sections 341/323/324/379/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that an altercation took place between the son of the informant as also petitioners no.1 to 3 besides others, while they were playing cricket in the evening hours. Informant claims to have gone to the house of petitioner no.4 for lodging his protest and there all the petitioners along with co-accused Aurangjeb are said to have assaulted the informant. It is further submitted that specific allegation of assault is against co- accused Aurangjeb only and so far these petitioners are concerned, there is general and omnibus allegation of assault. By referring to Annexure-3, it has been submitted that the matter has been compromised between the parties. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for 2 anticipatory bail but has not disputed the aforesaid position. In the aforesaid background, particularly in view of the fact that there is no allegation of specific overt act against the petitioners for causing any specific injury to the informant and also in view of the fact that the matter has been compromised between the parties, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today in Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S.Case No.133/2009, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate at Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)