IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. APP (DB) No.691 of 2011 Rajendra Jha, Son of Late Batuk Natha Jha, resident of village-Ballochak, P.S.-Dalsingsarai, District-Samastipur. ………Appellant. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Shobha Kant Jha, Son of Ram Padarath Jha, 3. Chandan Jha, Son of Shobha Kant Jha, 4. Ram Kumar Jha, Son of Ram Padarath Jha 5. Vidyanand Jha @ Funtun Jha, Son of Late Ganga Jha, 6. Birendra Jha, Son of Late Ganga Jha, 7. Anil Jha, Son of Ram Padarath Jha, 8. Ranjan Jha, Son of Shobha Kant Jha, 9. Vinod Choudhary, son of Late Padmakant Chaudhary. All are resident of village-Nagargama, P.S.-Dalsingsarai, District- Samastipur. ………….Respondents. ----------- 2. 26.07.2011 This is an appeal filed by the informant against acquittal. We have heard the matter as well as examined the judgment under appeal. We are convinced that the judgment requires no interference. The main charge against the accused persons was of Section 307 IPC. The trial court has in detail examined the matter and given two important findings. Firstly, that the prosecution was not sure as to who fired and secondly, even though prosecution case was specific that the firing caused injury on the chest, no such injury report was proved. No Medical Officer was examined. These two are sufficient proof to create doubts entitling the accused persons to acquittal. We do not have any reason to take a different 2 view in the matter. We have perused the judgment under appeal. We are satisfied that the trial court has appreciated the evidence and determined the issues in accordance with law. There is no perversity. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Sanjeet/ (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.) (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)