IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN CONTEMPT CASE No.916 of 2009 Between: Md. Sadiq ...Petitioner And Sri R. Dana Kishore and others. ...Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri K. Lakshman Counsel for respondent No.1 : Asst. Govt. Pleader for Revenue Counsel for respondent No.2 : Govt. Pleader for Panahcyat Raj Counsel for respondent No. 3 : Sri G. Elisha Counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 9 : Sri K. Lakshmi Manohar The Court made the following: ORDER: (per Sri Anil R. Dave, C. J.) 1) Upon hearing the learned Advocates and looking to the facts of the case, in our opinion, no case has been made out for contempt because appropriate opportunity was given under notice dated 18th June, 2009 to the petitioner to produce necessary evidence to show that the construction, which was put up by him, was on his own land and as per the sanctioned plan. 2) We do not see any violation of the order passed by this Court and, therefore, the contempt case is dismissed. ANIL R. DAVE, C.J. 30th October, 2009 RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J. ARS