r* TTT.^~TT f-f~i .f~ys TT~& MIljM t^tilJK J_J & ^.rj-^^^s jr3-r&. A A 1-&^.-?'. i-T A T nTT. A SI»TTD ^^ ^ ^s s aj,'L^rsr' s^;^'^,. S.B. : ("'••'"T-'^t-yi'S ,^t'^T .fC^-'-. ~^~ !^'~»,e.~Ti i7RIT PETITION iS) No. 2384 of 2007 T1 Neeta Pawar d'b Shri Bhaskar Pav.'ar, aged 38 yrs Assistant Teacher: Dani Girl.s Hieiier Secondai'v School; Raipur Distt- Raipur CG VERSUS : 1. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Through: The Secretar/ to the Govt. of Chhattisgarh. Schoo! Education Department. Mantralava: Raipur CG 2. The District Education. OiBcsr: Raipur CG ^ T1-p • it^ Princinal Dani Girls Higher Secondary School: Raipur Distt- Raipur CG WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF Present: Shri Aiiurag Shrivastava- Advocate for the pstitioner. Shri Aiav Dwivedi, Panel Lawver fbr the State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 18UI day ofApril, 2007) QTT'iSi^ /-•.--M-s-rt vf'i c''w:iif~'vf-Ci-p-s"!''rs +^'r tl'S^'i .<"i<3iTl+-t,^,-F'"t^-S* QC; •rt'i,'^^ i QQ 'ST-n,T th LiliS\i ^^.UlAS^i ^l.ypG^.i Jillg lUi UiS 'UCUi.i'^iiS?l •&•& VV^l^. Sl^ i.Ul U1C Stats/resoosidents ioictiv submit that the fact and auestion of law involved in the present writ oetrtion are the same to tliat of in tiliara Vs. MuiridDal Corporaticsn, Dm-s and another (IB MPJIl-CG 061. which has beeri _ b ..„.—_ :.^BC"' nfift03^.^EgKS21@^s^^gBii:$3BEI3KS_^_, ^p disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Learaed coucsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert tlie said submission. 2. Accordisgly, the writ petition is allowed in tenas of fhe order passed m the case of Yashwanf Bharadwaj Vs. Corporation, Diirg (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioaer has acquired B.Ed Examination Certificate on her own expenses as per the circulars datsd 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 md further whefher she has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^7hhf!-;h