IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYRNA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No.224 of 2006 Date of Decision:- 26.10.2006 Khushi Ram Singh ....Petitioner through Mr.Rajat Rathee, Advocate vs. Sadhu Singh Randhawa & ors. ....Respondents through Mr.G.S.Cheema, Sr.DAG, Punjab *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT *** SURYA KANT, J. The petitioner along with others filed C.W.P.No.1806 of 1997 which was disposed of on 5.2.1997 in the same terms as in C.W.P.No.17005 of 1989. In C.W.P.No.17005 of 1989, this Court had directed the respondents to refix the petitioners' pay equal to the one being drawn by other masters and mistresses immediate junior to the petitioners. Alleging non-compliance of the above-stated order, this contempt petition has been filed in the year 2006. In response to the show cause notice, the respondents No.1 and 2 have filed their respective affidavits. Along with the affidavit of respondent No.3, a copy of the order dated 8.1.1999 has been appended as Annexure R2/T vide which the petitioner's pay was re-fixed to his advantage. It further appears that the petitioner has also initiated some proceedings before the Civil Court, a reference to which has been made in the above-stated order dated 8.1.1999. C.O.C.P. No.224 of 2006 -2- In the absence of specific particulars of the juniors, how their pay was fixed, in what circumstances and how the petitioner's pay is to be fixed at the same place and in the same pay-scale, no further action can be taken in these proceedings, which are accordingly dropped. Rule discharged. October 26, 2006 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE