IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 12379 of 2008. Decided on: 29.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Khem Singh and others. … Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : Mr. Lokender Paul Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Yash W. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): The case of the petitioners, in a nutshell, is that they have been overlooked though they were fully eligible to be considered for appointment to the post of J.B.T. Teacher. It has come in the reply that a decision was taken by the State Government to fill up 149 posts of J.B.T. Teachers and the interview was fixed on 20.12.2002. The petitioners had not qualified the two years’ J.B.T. Training Course at that time. In fact, the petitioners had qualified the same in the month of May, 2003. Since the petitioners were not fully qualified on the date of interview, 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - there is no merit in the petition and the same is accordingly, dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 29, 2010. (sck).