IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:36838 of 1998 Between: 1 P.V.Krishna Rao, S/o Sitha Ramaiah, R/o Saidabad, Hyderabad 2 Sri S.Ramachanadra Murthy, S/o S.L.K.Rao, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad 3 Mir Naqui Askari, S/o Zahir Hussaian, R/o Bagum bazar, Hyderabad. 4 K.Sudershan Rao, S/o Raja Rao, R/o Sultanbazar, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Andhra Bank, Rep. by its Executive Director, Head Office, Saifabad, Hyderabad 2 The GM, (HRD), Andhra Bank, Saifabad, Hyderabad 3 The Secretary, Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance, Dept. of Economics Affairs(Banking Division), New Delhi. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.V.SRINIVAS The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioners herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an order or a direction or a Writ more Particularly in the nature of Writ of Certiorari quashing the circular No.218, dt.2-12-98 issued by the 1st and 2nd Respondents as invalid, illegal, violative to the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 of the Constitution of India.” Sri V.Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as such. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.45379 of 1998 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 16th DECEMBER, 2008. kvni