CWP No.678 of 2010 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.678 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:25.11.2011. Joginder Pal Ghai S/o Om Parkash, resident of 210/1, Balmiki Mohalla, Phagwara Road, Banga, District Saheed Bhagat Singh Nagar. ... Petitioner Versus Financial Commissioner, Revenue, Punjab, Chandigarh and others. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:Mr. G.S. Nagra, Advocate and Mr. G.K. Chawla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Navdeep Sukhana, DAG, Punjab, for the respondents. ***** 1.Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? NO 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? NO K. KANNAN, J. (Oral) 1. The counsel appearing for the State says that a verification had been made and it was found that the rates specified in the sale deeds drawn up by the petitioner conform to the Collector's rate. Action was being taken against the petitioner suspending the licence on a charge that he had specified in the sale deeds lesser value than the value given in the Collector's rate. Now in view of the statement made by the counsel for the State, it cannot follow that there was no delinquency or misconduct on the part of the petitioner. The CWP No.678 of 2010 (O&M) [2] suspension of licence already ordered and challenged in the present writ petition is quashed. 2. The writ petition is allowed. NOVEMBER 25, 2011 ( K. KANNAN ) Rajan JUDGE