IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1608 of 2008 GANGA PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 7.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Opposite party nos. 1 and 3 have filed their show cause. They have given details of the payment which has been made under GPF head of the petitioner from time to time. Petitioner in his rejoinder in paragraph-5 has stated that chart showing advance of Rs. 5000/- in April, 86 and Rs. 10,000/- in April, 2000 which had been taken by the petitioner is misplaced and the same has been deducted without any supporting document in this regard because no statement drawn has been submitted by Sub-Divisional Agriculture Officer (General) Arrah and the Block Development Officer, Makhdumpur. These are matters of verification of accounts and therefore no final opinion can be expressed on this issue. If the petitioner approaches the District Provident Fund Officer, Jehanabad on this count the District Provident Fund Officer will be obliged to satisfy the petitioner about those two entries. If there corresponding evidence of such withdrawal is not available then the account will have to be reconciled and payments have to be made to the petitioner. This contempt application stands disposed of with the above direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)