singu aai RE THE HON BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmsGARH AT BILASPUR (c G) x ‘ VERSUS Amoiak Singh Bhofio, aged P®NDENY ; ~3 «.15 } , ' ‘ £ " C U PETIThON UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OID£E 1973 FOR QUAS N6 THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FILED IIIDER SECTION 1386ETHE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT ’ 1851: § ‘MPLAINANT about 5O years, son of Lafe f Harbans Singh Bhafia, Liquor Contracfor, Dayalband, DisTric’r Bilaspur (C.G.) III»-! i ‘Bi if O Cr.M.P. No. /2ooy—/ ; i 3% r K A: ; € DNER R S Bojwo aged obouT 62/4“ 1‘9 I a}; ;« L, V \ JSED / Yeors FaR Q. 8,4 SWWWWV 2 x '* ¥ ’ Mmocho Colony, BIlospur. C~¢~ Ihgro’jr‘: ' ‘( 7 mmf‘a’w mmm mmféwm $aifa113néw SB : gONiEEE EVER. JUg’E‘ECE P} 13 98 201i} ' None. foy Tha partias. Evan after tha matia‘x: w? is caBed in tbs second round... Eons apgwamxad for iha E circumstancas, this Court has Accordingly, the ’patitio prosecufion. 2E’HEKER 3E‘WAKER yartias, tharefera: in tlmss n , Giher opkion but. to (iismiss n ' is dismiSS€ét for want of / the potition'for wait of prosecuaion. Sd/- Prit'mker Diwaker Judge