WPMS No. 1571 of 2009 With Stay App. No. 8032 / 09 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate present for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing the order dated 27.08.2009, passed by the Additional District Judge / F.T.C. V, Dehradun, in Misc. Appeal No. 19 of 2009, Ram Kumar and others Vs. Madan Mohan and others. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner instituted suit No. 352 of 2002 against the respondents in which an application for temporary injunction was moved. The trial court granted temporary injunction in favour of the plaintiff (present petitioner). Aggrieved by said order, the defendants filed Miscellaneous Appeal No. 19 of 2009 before the appellate court. The appellate court vide impugned order dated 27.08.2009, allowed the appeal and rejected the application for temporary injunction, moved in the suit. I have considered submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and also perused the impugned order. The appellate court has rejected the application for temporary injunction on the ground that defendants are the recorded tenure holders, and as such, the trial court erred in law in allowing the temporary injunction application. The appellate court took the view on the basis of the documentary evidence that the plaintiffs have no prima facie case as against the defendants. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and after going through the impugned order, this Court does not find any error of law committed by the appellate court. Therefore, the petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that the trial court shall expedite the trial of the suit. (Stay Application No. 8032 of 2009 also stands dismissed). (P.C. P., J.) 16.09.2009 HN