IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9295 of 2009 DR.AMAR NATH JHA, son of Late Krishna Deo Jha, resident of at & P.O. Rosera, P.S. Rosera, District Samastipur (Bihar) ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary- cum-Commissioner, Health, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 3. Civil Surgeon-Cum-Chief Medical Officer, Darbhanga. 4. Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Path, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 7. 17.12.2009 A supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents annexing the copy of the sanction orders with respect to the pension, gratuity and leave encashment issued on 4th of December, 2009, as contained in Annexure F and G to the counter affidavit, instructing the Accountant General to issue the necessary authorization. Learned counsel appearing for the Accountant General submits that in case till date the authorization has not been issued, the same shall be issued immediately. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it was expected that the respondent-authorities should had considered the grant of first and second time bound promotions which ultimately affect the pensionary benefits. Learned counsel for the State submits that the claim of the petitioner for grant of time bound promotion and also for grant of Assured Career Progression (ACP) on consideration was rejected. However, it will be open for the petitioner to submit the relevant 2 documents in support of his claim as stated in paragraph 9 of the supplementary counter affidavit. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not required to pass Hindi Noting and Drafting Examination although he has passed other examinations. Considering the above, the writ application as regards the payment of the retiral benefits is disposed of. However, it will be open for the petitioner to represent his case with regard to the grant of time-bound promotions/Assured Career Promotion in the light of the statements made in paragraph 9 of the supplementary counter affidavit. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)