IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 18TH MAY 2010 / 28TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 14758 of 2010(T) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. ANTONY, S/O. MATHEW VARKEY, AGED 40, AIKARAMATTOM HOUSE, KARIMANOOR, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 2. BINCY, W/O. ANTONY, AGED 31, AIKARAMATTOM HOUSE, KARIMANOOR, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.ANIL K.MOHAMMED RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALIYAR, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARIMANOOR, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 3. INDUSLND BANK LTD., 40/8399-8400, GOWRI NARYAN, OPP:JAYALAKSHMI SILKS, M.G.ROAD, KCOHI - 25, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. 4. MANOJ, REGIONAL HEAD, INDUSIND BANK LTD, 40/8399-8400, GOWRI NARYAN, OPP:JAYALAKSHMI SILKS, M.G.ROAD, KCOHI - 25. G.P. SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS FOR R1 & R2. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 14758 of 2010 T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 18th day of May, 2010 JUDGMENT Joseph, J. The petitioners have approached this Court seeking protection to the lives of the petitioners and their children from intimidation from respondents 3 and 4 and their henchmen. They have also sought for a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to register a case against the 4th respondent and to conduct an investigation, forthwith. 2. We heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, including the learned Government Pleader. 3. Learned counsel for respondents 3 and 4 submits that the allegations raised in the Writ Petition are not correct and they have no intention to threaten the petitioners and they will take steps only in accordance with law. W.P.(C).No. 14758 of 2010 2 4. We record the said submission and close this Writ Petition. We make it clear that in case there is any threat by respondents 3 and 4 against the petitioners, respondents 1 and 2 will provide adequate protection for the lives of the petitioners and their family members. (K. M. JOSEPH) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) Judge tm