IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 27TH OCTOBER 2011 / 5TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28552 of 2011(T) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- SUMESH BABU, S/O.C.R.BHAVADAS, CHAThAMKULAM HOUSE, KONGAD P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN SMT.P.G.BABITHA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. SPECIAL TAHASILDAR, OFFICE OF THE LAND TRIBUNAL, PALAKKAD-678 001. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER, MUNDUR-1 VILLAGE OFFICE, MUNDUR P.O., PALAKKAD-678 592. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AV WPC.NO.28552/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS : EXHIBIT P1: COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.3511/2007 OF S.R.O.PALAKKAD. EXHIBIT P2: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, PALAKKAD. EXHIBIT P3: COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT ISSUED FOR THE PERIOD 2008-09. EXHIBIT P4: COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT ISSUED FOR THE PERIOD 2010-11. EXHIBIT P5: COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 15/01/08 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P6: COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 25/09/2008. EXHIBIT P7: COPY OF THE NO- OBJECTION LETTER DTD.28/09/2008. EXHIBIT P8: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 23/12/2010 IN WPC.NO.38519/2010. EXHIBIT P9: COPY OF THE PURCHASE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P10: COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 27/06/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P11: COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE AV ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 28552 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 27th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, although his title is over 1.6188 hectares of land in R.S.Nos. 275/16, 275/17, 275/18, 276/9, 276/13, 276/14, 277/10 and 277/11 of Mundur-1 Village of Palakkad Taluk, in Ext.P9 purchase certificate, the extent shown is incorrect. He sought rectification of the above alleged mistake by filing Ext.P10 application before the 1st respondent. Orders on Ext.P10 have not been passed and therefore this writ petition is filed. 2. Taking note of this grievance of the petitioner, I direct the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P10 with notice to the petitioner and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp