IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6604 OF 2004 Shri Ananda alias Bhalchandra Keshav Paranjape ...Petitioner Versus Shri Anil Bandu Patil & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Ms.Leena Patil for Petitioner. Mr.A.M.Kulkarni for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. AUGUST 18, 2004. AUGUST 18, 2004. AUGUST 18, 2004. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel appearing for the parties. 2. I find no reason to interfere with the discretionary order passed by the Court below at this interlocutory stage. The Court below has proceeded to exhibit the concerned documents on the finding that they are public documents. In so far as the discrepancies in the said documents are : 2 : concerned, the efficacy thereof has been kept open and will be considered at the appropriate stage, as is stated in Para 10. If it is so, no case for interference is made out. Rejected. 3. It is made clear that dismissal of this Writ Petition should not be considered as expressing any opinion on the correctness of the said documents one way or the other. That aspect will be considered by the Trial Court at the appropriate stage. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.