1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 90/2008 (M/s Hotel Amarjeet Vs. M.T.D.C., & anr.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM :D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 13, 2008. Heard Mr. Kulkarni for the petitioner. The counsel for the petitioner states that the grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that pursuant to the tender notice whereby tenders were invited for the purpose of construction of Tourist Reception Centre on B.O.T. basis, the petitioner submitted his tender, along with one another. However, both these tenders were cancelled by the authorities on the ground that the amounts quoted by the bidders were much less than expected and, therefore, in order to have more competition, the authorities have rejected entire tender process. The learned 2 counsel, therefore, contended that the procedure adopted by the respondent- authority is not just and proper. Considered the contentions canvassed. Perused the impugned communication dated 5th November, 2007. It is mentioned in the tender document at note 5 on page 2 thereof that the Competent Authority reserves right to reject any or all offers without assigning any reason whatsoever. It is, therefore, evident that in a given case, for the reasons to be recorded, it is open for the authority to reject the tenders. In the instant case, in view of the reasons given by the authorities for rejecting the tenders, we are of the view that no case is made out for showing indulgence. Writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE RMP