@ my. 'EHE EON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARE A? BILASPUR WP. s. No. ggM? ()F 2010 $§§€§£E §§§€§$§ FETETKQNERS 1. /Laxmikant Verma S/ o Shri Vishram Vermat aged about—35 years, Govt.‘ Ayurved Compounder, resident of village— Teela, Post— Semra, RS. Nawapara, Distt. Raipur(C.G.). ‘ Manmohan Prasad Jaiswal S/o Shri Hari Shankar Jaiswal, aged about~3l years; Govt. Ayurved Compounder, reSideni of Village 8L Post— Sel, Via— Katagi, PS Kagdd, Distt. Raipur (C.G.). Ramadhar Sahu S/o Shri Anujram Sahu, aged about«39 years, Govt. Ayurved Compo‘under, resident of Village— Rahnudu Tahsil— Pamgarh, Distt. Janjgir»Champa. 'r Virendra Kumar Verma S / 0 Shr‘i vM’anmohan Lai Verma) aged about~4§ years, Govt. Ayurved Compounden residen'l of village— Khandwa, Post—Uparwara, Erst‘s. Raipur (C.G.). Ramadhar Verma S/o Shri‘ £"?wari‘k’3 Prasad Verma,‘ aged about—39 years, Govtr Ayurved Compounder, resident of villager Mangasa, Post— Pathari, Distt. Raipu‘r (CG) x” Mohan Lal Sinhavi S/ o Shri Ramcharan Sinha, (aged about—37 years, Govt, Xxx/L Compounder, Govt. Ayurved Dispensary, Khamhariya, Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur, Kamal Narayari'Sahu S/o Shri Shobharam Sahu, aged about—3‘7 years? Govt /‘\yi:;w;::t% Compounder, R/o Santoshi Nagar, Raipur. Distt. Raipur (C.G.). n (Q r, 8. Smt. Kaushalya Kurr€ Wifsa of Shri Shymzi Charan Kurre, aged about—39 years, {10%, Ayurved Compounder, Govt. Ayurvsd Dispensary, Nagar Panchayat— Tundra, Via‘ Karagi (Kasdol), Distt. Raipur (C.G.)A 9./Smt. Parmeshwari Jaiswal wife 0f Shri Kamal 'Narayan Jaiswal, aged about—36 years, Govt. Ayurved Compounder, Gdvi. Ayurved Dispensary Rawan, Baloda Bazar, if I Distt. Raipur (C.G.). 10. Ku. Toshan Sahu D/o Mangani Ram, aged Govt. Ayurvcd Compounder, Govt. Ayurved Dispensary, about—32 years, Mandlor (Abhanglr) , Distt. Raipur (C.G.). Rik (bCwMMJLgH l ll. Smt. Savitri Yogi”. aged about—35 years, Govt. Ayurved CompOunder, Govt. Ayurved Dispensary, Damaru (Baloda Bazar) , Distt. Raipur (C.G.). 12/Bajjnath Bhagat S/o Shri Sundarmam, aged about—44 years, Govt. ’Ayurveo‘, Compounder, Govt. Ayurved Dispensary, Amsena (Aarang) , Distt. Raipur (C.G.). 13. Ku. Pratibha Kurre D/o Shri Balakram Kurre, aged about—37 years, Govt. Ayurved Compounder, Govt. Ayurved Dispensary, /Nipaniya (Bhatapara) , Distt. Raipur {CG}. 14. Hemant Kumar Naik S/o Shri Sewaram aged about—32 years, Govt. Ayarved Compounder, Govt. Ayurved Dispensary, Gurra (Simga) , Distt. Raipur (C (3.). 15./“Parmanand Sahu S/o Shri Lalararn Saht‘i, aged about‘lr‘i years, Govt. Ayurvm‘? Compounder, Govt. Ayurved Dispensary, Arjuni (Kasdoh , Dis’tt. Raipur (C.G.}. 16/./ Vinay Kumar Singh S/o Shri Ramdharé 3 Singh, aged about~41 years, Govt. Ayurved @ Compounder, Govt. Ayurved Dispensary, Parsada Joshi (Fingeshwar) , Distt. Raipw: VERSUS / §R§F€ENDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). State of Madhya Pradesh through Secretary, Aayush Department, Government of MP. Mantralay, Ballabh Bhavan, Bhopal (M.P.)l ,Director, Aayurved, Yog Awam Prakritik Chikitsa, Yunani, Siddh Awam Homeopathi (Aayush), Raipur (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Zila Aayurved Officer, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.). WEE? PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE QQESTETUTION OF INDIA ‘,PL 3‘N-{1‘yu (b Wmw ......................................... _ 200 311%21 m (W21) mm 11m aim WWm wW a; aim m KER BEWAKER SB ‘ H$EWBLE MR. JUS’E‘ECE ? EQQEQQIé Sh’ri M Kurnar Sinha, nse‘i ’0 tha E‘aetitic-zrim, Smt. Smita Ghai, R1, for th St Grievance of the petitions s in the present petition are that presently they are working as Ay rved Compounder and are entitled for regularization but their ckaim as not been considered by the CG Government. Couileel for the petitioners bmits that in the tate of Madhya Pradesh, caee ’of simiiariy plat persons have been considered. pursuant to the order dated 0.7.2010 passed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court in “$98392 2010 and ether identical matters. He further submits that ends iustice would be served if the petitianets are permitted to wit draw this netition with iiberty to make representation in terms of o der Annexm‘e P/ 1’ . tate counsel has no objec ion if the petitioners make any such representation and the same i‘s ing decided in accordance with iaw after due scrutiny of the fac and the poiicy of the State of Chhattisqai‘h. Accordingly, the petitione‘s are permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty as aforesa In the eventuality of making any such representation, the same w uld be decided in accordance with law after considering aii the fact a1 and legal aspects of the case, as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that this urt has not expressed any c o on merits of the case and the an ority concerned wouid be at iéberty to decide the representation in ac ordance with law. RI W a c u u d : f b . t i . t o mafsaanaw M wW $aimm QB HON’BLE MP JUSTICE PR1 ENKER BIWAKER 29 9° 2010 Sh’ri Maury: Kumar Sinha, c unsa‘i for the Detitiongrs‘ Smt. SmitaGhai, R1, for th Staie‘ Grievance of the petitions s in the prewnt petition are that ved Compeunder and are entitled. s not been considered by the C.Gt presently they are working as A for regularization but their claim Government. Counsel for the petitioner bmits that in the tate of Madhya Pradeshg case ’of similarly plat: d persons have been considered ursuant to the order dated 0.7.2010 passed by the Madhy'a Pradesh High Court in W‘Pl8392 20 10 and other identical matters. justice would be served if the petitioners are permitted to wit draw this petition with liberty to make representation in terms of o der Annexure P/ 12. State counsel has no objeo ion if the petitioners make any such representation and the same is b .ing decided in accordance with law and the policy of the State of He further submits that ends after due scrutiny of the fac Chhattisgarh. Accordingly, the petitione‘s are permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty as aforesa In the eventuality of making any such representation, the same W uld be decided in accordance with law after considering all the fact ai and legal aspects of the case, as expeditiously as possible. lt is made clear that this urt has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the au" ;.ority concerned would be at liberty W r y a s u p f t i , c