<^5; v S .&:, r-^.)t:F 'o-^ ^y ^ ^;^^- i^Js^ai HIGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIOI WRn PETmON fS) No. 5830 of2008 Ranchhor Kumar Shamia S/'o Late Bhaeirathi Shanna aged about 48 years, working as Trainina Officer, Grade II, I.T.I. Bastar, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDEKTS : l. State of Chhs.ttisgarh, Through its Secretary, Man Power and P!aimmg Department D.K.S. 3'tiawan- Raipur (C.G.) °' 2. Director, Employmiint and Trainiag Women Poh-technie Campus, Byran Bazar, Raipw ,'c' r^\ ^^'.'J..? WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDlA >^J-?* S. n°ble SBn itaoti'i, J. Presem: Shri Vinod Di SM M.P.S.Bhatis State/resDondents eshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner. hatia, Deputy G-ovenaiient Advocatc fer the (Passed on 20th day of October, 2008) With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up tbr fmal hearing. Leamed counsel appearlng fbr tbe petitioner submits thal the petrtioner was ii-utia.Uy appouited as Junior Instnictor (Craftsmaii) at I.I.J. Mana. District Raipur, on the pay scale ofRs. 740-15-800-2-0900-25-1000-30- 1210-40-1250/0 for a period of 89 days on adhoc basis against the sanctioned vacam post bv order dated 04.04.1987. The services of'the petirioner were contuiued with artificiai break of two or three days in service and worked coatinuousiy till the date ofhis reguiarisation. Ths simiiarly situated employees have approached the State Admiiiistrative Tribunal (for short 'SAT') m Original Application No. 1979 of 1991 (Satish Kumar Mandloi v. State of Madliya Pradesh end another) pravins for simiSar relief as sousht fbr in fhis petition. Leamed counsel appearing &r the petitioner submits that this case may also be dis-Dosed ofin the same terms. •I f'.'^ Aimt 3. Sfari Desbimukh, submits that the petitioner does not want to coctest this iiiatter on merits. However, the petitioner may be peiTnitted to make a representation before the authorities concemed in 'ight of the judgmeiit and order passed in O.A. No. 1979/1991 (supra), wiiich mav be considered and decided in accordance Vvith lav/, as expeditiously as possible. 4. Shri Bhatia, leamed Deputv Govemn'ient Advocate submits that in the event a representation is made, the same shall be considered aiid decided in lieht ofthe order ofthe SAT as aftire-stated, after verilving the facts of the case, iii accordance witli law, on its own msrits. as expeditioiish' as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks fi'om the date of receipt ofthe represeiitation. 5. In view ofthe foregoing, accordms to leanied couiisel appearing for the petitioner, nothing siirvives fbr aajudication. 6. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judee