IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5516 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 23.09.2009 Mahesh Gupta and others .....Petitioners versus Major Surjit Singh Bindra .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.D.K.Singal, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed by the petitioner-tenants against the order dated 25.4.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, whereby their application for amendment of the written statement has been dismissed. It may be noticed that the aforestated application has been moved by the petitioner-tenants after conclusion of their evidence. The plea taken is that the respondent-landlord has misrepresented the facts that he does not own any other house, whereas after the death of his father, he has inherited share in H.No.120, Sector 18-A, Chandigarh. C.R. No.5516 of 2009 (O&M) 2 The Rent Controller, Chandigarh has dismissed the amendment application after observing that the respondent-landlord has already disclosed in the eviction petition that his deceased father had executed a Will in favour of his mother on the basis of which she has obtained succession certificate and the House No.120, Sector 18-A, Chandigarh has been transferred in her name. The issue, as to whether or not the respondent-landlord requires the house in dispute, for his personal use and occupation, is a question of fact which is yet to be decided by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh on the basis of the evidence led by the parties. No interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction, is called for in the impugned order. Dismissed. 23-09-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE