S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 11134/2009 (Chhotu Singh vs. State of Raj.) Order dt:5/5/2010 1/2 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 11134/2009 (Chhotu Singh vs. State of Raj.) DATE OF ORDER : 5/5/2010 HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.Shambhoo Singh, for the petitioner. Mr.I.S.Pareek, for the respondent. Heard learned counsels. This case comes up on an application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC filed by Ram Kishore seeking to be impleaded as party respondent. In the facts and circumstances of the case, he is not considered to be a necessary and proper party, therefore, the I.A.No. 4728/10 is accordingly rejected. Further perusal of the contents of the writ petition, which was mentioned to be an urgent case by the learned counsel for the State, it appears that the petitioner approached this Court prematurely. The petitioner is said to be aggrieved of the order Annex.6 dated 22/10/2009 passed by Shri Hema Ram Choudhary, the Revenue Minister, who has recommended the petitioner's transfer to the Board of Revenue, Ajmer and the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department has forwarded the said recommendation to the Board of Revenue for doing the needful. No order of transfer is yet passed by any competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is bound to be so passed in view of the recommendation of the Hon'ble Revenue S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 11134/2009 (Chhotu Singh vs. State of Raj.) Order dt:5/5/2010 2/2 Minister. The stay order granted by this Court on 14/12/2009 was read out to the petitioner, which is to the following effect, “Meanwhile, the transfer of the petitioner on the post of Personal Assistant to District Collector Nagaur shall remain stayed.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief prayed for is that the petitioner should not be transferred from the post of Personal Assistant to the District Collector, Nagaur to any other post. The terms of stay order are exactly opposite to his own interest. Be that as it may, the impugned communication Annex.6 cannot be said to be a transfer order passed by any competent authority. The order Annex.6 is a recommendation by the Hon'ble Revenue Minister to the Board of Revenue and no order of transfer has yet been passed by the competent authority. Therefore, the present writ petition is premature and same deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. (DR.VINEET KOTHARI), J. item no. 86 baweja/-