1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 61 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5584 OF 2010 (Smt. Aarti Vinayak Pandharipande .v. Gaurav Prakash Sahadeo) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri R.L. Khapre, Advocate for the appellant. Shri R.R. Srivastava, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 13TH JULY, 2011. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. We find no fault or any jurisdictional error in the order passed by the trial Court on 08.10.2010. The learned Single Judge also found that there was no jurisdictional error in the impugned order dated 08.10.2010. However, the learned Single Judge granted liberty to the appellant to challenge the impugned order dated 08.10.2010 after the suit was finally decided and the contentions raised on behalf of the appellant in the writ petition were kept open. Since the liberty was granted to the appellant to challenge the impugned order dated 08.10.2010 after the suit was finally decided and since all the contentions raised by the appellant before the learned Single Judge were kept open, we find that no prejudice is caused to the appellant. Hence, the LPA is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.