1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO:5648 /2007 (Sheetal Devidas Raut vs. State of Maharashtra and others) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. ................................................................................................................................... CORAM: D.D.SINHA & A. P. BHANGALE , JJ. DATED: 13th April, 2009. *** 1. Heard Mr V N Morande, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr S J Jichkar, learned AGP for Respondent No.1; Mr H A Deshpande for Respondent No.2 : Mr H K Pande for Respondent No.4 and Mr A.A.Naik for Respondent No.5. 2. This Writ Petition is directed against the impugned communication dated 6.2.2007, whereby the services of the petitioner as Anganvadi Sevika came to be terminated. 3. Considered the contentions canvassed by the respective counsel. It is not in dispute that as per the proclamation issued by the Balvikas Prakalp Adhikari dated 14.2.2005, the terms and conditions of eligibility for the purpose of considering the candidate for appointment of 2 Anganwavadi Sevika were mentioned. One of the conditions was that if the candidate has two years experience as Anganvadi Sevika, such a candidate was eligible to get ten additional marks. In the instant case, the eligibility certificate granted to the petitioner was cancelled by the Competent Authority on 15.3.2005 though on the basis thereof, the petitioner was given 10 marks. This fact was discovered by the authority at a later point of time and, therefore, the impugned order of termination came to be passed. 4. Since the petitioner was given marks during the process of interview on the basis of experience certificate which was already revoked by the Competent Authority on 15.3.2005, the action of the respondent,in our view, is just and proper and requires no interference at the hands of this Court. The Petition suffers from lack of merit, hence dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE sahare