^«L\^ o^^v HiGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH : BILASPUR WRITPETmON i'22T)No. 710 of 2009 PETJTtONERS Appjjcante, 1. Hyukumchand Rai, age 55 years, son of Premnarayan, Up-Sarpanch, Panch of Ward No.9, Gram panchayat-Ratga, Janpad Panchayat Man^ahi, Tahsil Manvahi, Dlstt. BIIaspur (CG). 2. Tekchand. age 40 years, son of Deendayal, Panoh ofWard No.3. 3. Sudhar Singh, age. 40 years, son of Devnth, Panch ofWard No.7. 4. Ghanaram, age 35 years, son of Shyam Lal.PanchofWardNo.10. 5. Jawahar Lal. age 30, son of Ramjiyawan, PanchofWardNo.4. 6. Bechuil age 50, son of Lala, Panch of Ward No.5. 7. Jaiesh Kumar, age 40 years, son of Ramprasad, Panch ofWard No.8. 8. Rup Slngh age 35 years, son of Ranmat Singh, Panch ofWard No.11 . 9. Nohar Slngh, age32 years, son of Daddu Singh, Panch ofWard No.13. 10. Swarup Singh. age 28 years, son of Chaitu Singh, Panch of Ward No.14. 11. Ganpatiya Bai, age 52 years, wife of Bhagwandin, Panch ofWard No.15. 12. Rajkumari age 30 years. wife of Rajkumar, Panch ofWard No»16. 13. Aarti Lahre age 36 years, wjfe of Ramesh Kumar, Panoh of Ward NoJ7. 14. Anita Bai. age 45 years, wife of Balwaan Singh, Panch ofWard No. 18. 15. Shanti Bai. age 46 years, wife of Shuklachar, Panch ofWard Ne. 19. 16. Rahaswati. age 50 years, wife of Swarup Stngh, PanchofWardNo.20. ^^5S?^ yf^€% y ^^ '^ 1 ^%S %, %^. ^ ./ '^s. ^^^" ^ RESPONDENTS: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. .z- Versus Amol Singh Kariyan, son of Shrawan Singh, Ex-Sarpanch, Gram Panohayat Ratga, Janpad Panchayat Marwahl, Tahsil Manvahi, Distt. Bitaspur (CG). Director. Raipur^ Panchayat, Chhattlsgarh. State of Chhattisgarh, through Prindpal Secretary, Panchayat and Gramin Vikas Vibhag, D.K. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). Addi. Collector Pendra Road, Biiaspur (CG). S.D.O (Revenue) cum VihiS Adhikari, Pendra Road, Distt. Bilaspur (C-G). Sheonath Singh, Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Ratga, Janpad Panchayat IViarwahi, Tahsil Marwahi", Distt. Bilaspur (CG). (Writ petjtion under Artiele 227 of ths Constitution of India) Singte Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Mr. Kama! Pandey, counse! for the petitioners. Mr. A.S. Kaehhawaha, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on this Sth day of February, 2009) Learned counse! appearing for the petitioners submits that the appeal fited before the Additionai Collector, Pendra Road, against the order dated 1-7-2008 passed by the Sub Divisionai OfRcer (Revenue). Pendra Road, pending before the Sub Djvlsional Officer/Prescribed Authority was disposed of on 11-7-2CX)8. !n view of that no appeal was maintainabje before the Additjona! Collector against the order 1-7-2008. 2) The petiuQner has preferred this petition against the order dated 17-7-20C^, whereby the order dated 1-7-2008 passed by the Sub DMsionat Officer (Revenue), Pendra Road, has been stayed, ti!! disposal ofthe case. ..-^•3SS?S%.. y^^^?^':'^ f §1;:;la '^ .^" 3) i oo not find any merit in the contention of the petitioners. If the petitioners' case is tiiat the appeai itself is not majntainable against the order dated 1-7-2008, the petitioners shouSd take up this issue before the authority, wherein the appeal is stili pending under conslderation. tn the norma! course, if the order passed by the subordinate court. prima facie, deserves to be stayed, the superior court should stay the operation of the said order. 4) in view of the fact that the appeal is pendlng consideration, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition js devoid of merit and Is aceordinaSy dismissed. ConsequentSy, I.A.No.1 also stands dismissed. R^u Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge