1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.11408 of 2011 B.Vinothkannan @ Kannan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District. 2.The Tahsildar, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's patta modification application dated 18.03.2011 by implementing the order passed by the District Revenue Officer in O.Mu.No.G5/22101/2011 dated 06.04.2011 after giving opportunity to all the party concerned within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner ... Mr.J.Lawrance For Respondents ... Mr.M.Govindan Special Govt. Pleader ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner's patta modification application dated 18.03.2011 by implementing the order passed by the District Revenue Officer in O.Mu.No.G5/22101/2011 dated 06.04.2011 after giving opportunity to all the party concerned within the time stipulated by this Court. 2. Heard Mr.J.Lawrance, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader who takes notice for the respondents. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The petitioner has made an application on 18.03.2011 for implementing the order passed by the District Revenue Officer dated 06.04.2011 as mentioned above after giving opportunity to all the parties. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. Without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the second respondent is directed to consider the said claim of the petitioner based on the application dated 18.03.2011 on its own merit and in accordance with law expeditiously. If any third party will be affected by the nature of the relief sought for by the petitioner, the authority shall hear such person to avoid the allegations of violation of principles of natural justice. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned is free to deal with the matter on its own merit as per law. 6. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The District Collector, Madurai District. 2.The Tahsildar, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. Rsb ssk/19.10.2011 /3c -2p/- W.P.(MD)No.11408 of 2011 30.09.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/