1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUD ICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3751 /2009 [Jamil Ahmed s/o Abdul Aziz vs. State of Maharashtra ) ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr M A Atique, Adv. for applicant Mr A.S. Fulzele, APP for respondent .......... CORAM : A.P.BHANGALE, J. DATED : JANUARY 28, 2010. Heard. 2. By means of this application, the applicant prays for grant of bail in respect of Crime No. 159/2009 for offence punishable u/ss. 395, 452, 342 of the IPC registered at Police Station Tiwsa, Dist. Amravati 3. It appears that the trial Court i.e. learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati by order dated 4.11.2009 in Misc. Criminal Application No.660/2009 and 717/2009 rejected the bail application preferred by this applicant, considering the alleged discovery of property made at his instance. 4. Learned APP stoutly objected grant of bail on the ground that apart from serious accusation that five unknown persons had entered in the godown of cement factory with weapons and confined the watchman in a room, threatening him at the point of weapons, had robbed the iron and cement sheets amounting to Rs.2,50,000/- carried away by the Tempo Truck No. MH 2 15-B 1939. The vehicle used in the offence was also recovered. According to learned APP, test identification parade is still awaited. Furthermore it appears that the applicant has given his address as Resident of Pakizah Colony, Amravati which, in my opinion, cannot be considered as a sufficient information regarding fixed address, more so in the absence of any document to support the same with necessary particulars. 5. For the reasons stated herein-above, I am not inclined to grant bail. However, the applicant shall be at liberty to seek bail after test identification parade is over, giving full particulars of his residential address and names of sureties etc. The application is rejected. JUDGE sahare