THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.27556 of 2005 Date:27.12.2005 Suri Rammohan Goud. --------PETITIONER Managing Director and another. ---------RESPONDENTS ORDER: The petitioner, who was employed as a Driver in the APSRTC, was retired on medical grounds, through order, dated 20.10.2005. The petitioner states that the respondents are under obligation to provide him alternative appointment in terms of Section 47 of the Persons With Disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation) Act, 1995 (for short ‘the Act’) as well as the Circulars issued by the Corporation. He states that the respondents have not taken any steps for implementation of the same. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. It is true that the Corporation framed certain schemes, for the purpose of providing rehabilitation or employment, as the case may be, to the drivers, who are retired on medical grounds. The liability under the Act is another aspect of the matter, which needs to be considered. The record does not disclose that the petitioner has made any representation in this regard. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to submit a representation to the respondents, seeking necessary relief. As and when such a representation is made, the respondent shall pass appropriate orders thereon, within a period of three (3) months from the date of presentation of the same. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 27.12.2005 Jsu