IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.10108 of 2008 Between: Decharaju Venkat Rao S/o,Vasista being minor, rep.by his mother and natural guardian Smt.D.Kanaka Ratna, R/o.Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Endowments Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, rep.by its Chief Secretary (Revenue) .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent in not considering the case of the petitioner fro denotification of the Decharajuvari Chowltry and the properties attached thereto situated at Pedanandipadu village & Mandal, Guntur District and meanwhile interfering with the enjoyment of the same as arbitrary, illegal, failure to exercise power violative of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Articles, 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India apart from being violative of the procedure contemplated under the provisions of the Act 30 of 1987 and consequently direct the respondent to consider petitioner’s case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.V.R.RUDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.10108 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent in considering the representation of the petitioner dated 09.11.2007 for denotification of Decharajuvari Chowltry and the properties thereto situated at Pedanandipadu village in Guntur District and meanwhile interfering with the petitioner’s enjoyment of the said property as arbitrary and illegal, and for a consequential direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner’s case. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments. When this matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that the respondent may be directed to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders. In view of the said submission, without going into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of, at the stage of admission, directing the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 09.11.2007 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 1st May 2008 Sh To 1. The Chief Secretary (Revenue), Endowments Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad., 2. Two C.Cs to 3. Two C.D. copies.