IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No.735 of 2008 Sushil Bana & others .......... Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others .......... Respondents Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate vice Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B. S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the private respondent. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate vice Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B. S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the private respondent. 2. Learned Brief Holder for the State submits before this Court that it has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit that the police has completed the investigation and after completion of investigation the police has found that there is no prima-facie case against the petitioners, namely Sushil Bana, Smt. Beer Bala and Himanshu Bana, and as such the police has submitted the chargesheet before the court concerned against the petitioners. It was further submitted that in view of above the writ petition filed by petitioners seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them has, now, become infructuous. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 16.09.2008 stands vacated automatically. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 27.03.2009 LSR