-: 1 :- appr-315 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIM. APPLICATION NO. 315 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPL.(st.) NO. 479 OF 2010 with CRIMINAL REVISION APPL.(st.) NO. 479 OF 2010 Maskur Alam Siddique. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Moin Khan i/b M/s. Mishra & Co., for the applicant. Mr. S. G. Surana for R-3. Mr. D. P. Adsule, APP for the State. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : November 22, 2011. P. C. : 1. This application is filed for condoning the delay of 95 days caused in filing the revision. In paragraph no.3 the applicant has made following statement : “3. The Applicant submit that his house has been demolished by the Respondent 2 to 5 on 2/12/2009 and since then he is on road and running here and there for shelter and unable to file revision application in time.” 2. The application is opposed by the respondents by filing srp -: 2 :- appr-315 affidavit of respondent no.3. In paragraph nos. 4(d) and (e), the averments are made that the applicant in his capacity as Secretary of Navjeevan Rahivasi SRA CHS Ltd had filed two Writ Petitions in this Court, being W.P. No. 2532 of 2009 and 1423 of 2010. The first one was withdrawn on 1/2/2011 and second one was disposed of by the order dated 28/9/2010. 3. The averments made in paragraph nos. 4(d) and 4(e) by respondent no.3 in the affidavit-in-reply have not been controverted by the Applicant by filing any re-joinder. The averments mentioned above, undisputedly shows that after the demolition of the Applicant’s house on 2/12/2009, the Applicant had filed two writ petitions and prosecuted the same till 28/9/2010. The present revision is filed on 24/9/2010. The ground for condonation of delay pressed into service is, thus, totally false one. In these circumstances, I am not inclined to condone the delay. Hence, application is rejected. 4. In view of rejection of delay condonation application, Revision does not survive and it is accordingly disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.)