1. IN THEHIGH COURT OF JUD<CATURE. CHHATISGARH AT BILASUR. WRIT PETITiON N0- goO^) QF 20W PETITIONER. .../v '^^ ^yy ^yr^ ^s^> Q<?^.--" /^^" ^y^' y SUMITKHARE, S/0 LATE SHRI V K KHARE AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS C/0 SUKUMAR HALDAR WARDNO. 2, SATION ROAD, MANDENDRAGARH, DIST: KOREA, C.G. STATE. ^" ^~ RESPONDENT: OFC.G. ^/.^). .•y.«v!.3 // *s'~ ^ 'lw ...^*' ^ / * / <£• At' VERSUS 1)STATE THRU SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPT. DKS BHAWAN, RAiPUR C.G.STATE. / 2)01STRtCTCOLLECTOR, BA1KUNTPUR KOREA D1ST, C.G. STATE.. 3) DIST. EDUCATION OFFICER, BA1KUNTPUR, KOREA DIST., C.G.STATE, WR!T PET!T!ON UNDER ARTiCLE 226/227 OF THE CONST!TUT!ON . OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRtATE WRIT (S) / ORDER (S) / tDlRECTION (S), ETC. ^^isStsSSiS.-f^fss.g: XI-HC-78 3n^T?iTR-ii* trar.'Hi^i s*iiii+ Barve >• *TTqdl ^qitt) 3^ -<<wii-i<<, ®Tfl^'i6,Rni^y Ij^ .K^).P.^ fi- .<^&G$2.( €200 3ii^<i4a<*i ('i^it^'5!'^') OTaRTCfllN'W^T 27,6.2006:- Shri G.S. Agrawal, Sr. Advo| petilioner. Shri Ashutosh Kachhawa respondents on advancecopy. Heard both the counse!. The main grievanoe of the being appointed on compassionat^ the State Governmerrt after the dea working as Assistant Teacher in t^ Manendragarh, District Korea. Learned counsel for the pe( the death of his father moved an ai on 26-5-2005 before the respond| of the fact that the petitioner is fi] appointment after considering the <| »i<il<i<(1-ftfi>iiiTffte^t<Ri*di< ^sri^rsn^T ^te with Shri K.R. Nair, Advocate for the iha, Govt. Advocate for the State/ letitioner in this petition is that he is not ground in accordance with the policy of [h of his father on 28-2-2005 while he was ie Government Primary Schoot, Keluva, itioner submitted that the petitioner after iplication for compassionate appointment snt No.3 in .accordance with the policy issued by the State Government, bjjt his applteation is kept pending in spite ffiliing atl the criteria for compassionate appointment. He further submitte|ci that in Ihe ciroumstances respondent No.3 be directed to decide applic^ition of the petitioner for compassionate ^laim of the petitioner in accordance with the policy to which learned counsel for respondents has no objection. Having heard learned couns^l for the parties and having regard to the facts and cireumstances of the ca^e, respondent No.3 is directed to decide the application of the petitioner r^garding compassionate appointment in accordance with policy within a peri With the direction aforesaid, Parties are entitled for certifi^d copy of this order. [>d of 2 months from today. fhe petition stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge