IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 22991 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: October 5, 2010. Jarnail Singh and another. ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab ...... RESPONDENT(s) Present: Mr. J.B.S.Gill, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.D.Sachdeva, Addl.A.G., Punjab. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in FIR No.107 dated 14.07.2010, under Sections 148/323/324/326/ 452/149 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Hoshiarpur. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners that total seven persons have been involved in this case and that, in fact, entire family of petitioners has been involved by the complainant and petitioners are also father and son. Further contends that injury attributed to petitioner No.1 –Jarnail Singh is with brick-bat on left ankle whereas injury attributed CRM No.M-22991 of 2010 to petitioner No.2 -Satwant Singh is on left shoulder with Kirpan. Further contends that they have been continuing in custody since 24.07.2010. Further contends that all the accused in this case have been arrested and two of them are already on bail and that three accused are still in custody. Further contends that investigation and trial is not likely to be concluded. These facts have not been disputed by learned counsel for the State. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Jarnail Singh and Satwant Singh @Monti is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Hoshiarpur. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) October 5, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2