IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2049 of 2010 BRINDLAL SINGH @ BRIND SINGH . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3. 10.03.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 302 and other provisions of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act is that even after the entire materials from the case diary noticed in the impugned order of rejection with regard to suspicion there is nothing to suggest that he falls in the category of assailant. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, XII, Patna in Sessions Trial No. 681 of 2009 arising out of Punpun PS Case No. 64 of 2003. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)