IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17094 of 2011 YOGENDRA YADAV, SON OF LATE HAJARI GOPE Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. By an order dated 18.8.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. 24351, the petitioner was refused bail but was granted bail by an order dated 24.11.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. 38142 of 2010 with the direction that an affidavit be filed on his behalf that he has fair antecedent. Since the petitioner is an accused in one other case, such an affidavit could not be filed. Considering that on merits, the petitioner was found fit to be granted bail, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Hilsa (Nalanda), in Sessions Trial No. 574 of 2010/74 of 2010 arising out of Nagarnausa P.S. Case No. 144 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the Bhagina of the petitioner namely, Sunil Kumar. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that 2 he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)