PETITION ER . RESPONDENTS $§§¥§§LE BENCH @ Z W\"""// IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G) P. s No. 6 SQ 2010 W. : Smt. Jyoti Thakur, aged about43 years, W/o Shri ‘Satyanarayan Singh Thakur, Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School, Mahatma Gandhi, Jagdalpur, Baster (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through , Secretary, School Education Department ’ D.K.S.V Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) x 2. District Education Officer, Baster, District Jagdalpur (C.G.) Nutan Kumar Thakur, S/o Late Shri Goverdhan Singh, aged about 39 years, Upper Division Teacher, Government Middie School, Jamgaon, Keshkai, Block Baster, District Jagdalpur (C.G.) /~ :1. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA M / ‘r‘ \\\ ‘ \0 I-H 78 1n_ WW‘ L 200 mm (Wu) WW Wm $3if‘a'qm TI$KER DIWAKER WWW B : H£WBLE MR. JU$TECE S P i1.11.2010 Shri Smt. KSPawar $mta Ghéi counse1 ? Lkfe'i‘ EO 6 t1 gétek L pe‘Tmoner. Gn'evance of fha petitiene is mat though ma patifioner has gmferraé a yepresenta‘ricn ggrievaii by hsr SupsrS6$$ion the same has not baen decitied t’ dais. Counsel far th€ petitiona refxarrsd to tbs gradation list {annexure P— 1) from which it found that the p€titiou€r is placed over and above tha respa dent No.3. it is also stated m the petition that the petitixmer h his quaM§cati0n of M.A., B.Ed. smd belongs to geseral catego y. Further contention of the petiiioner is that she has sever been communicated with 311V adverse remark nor any Depa ental Esquiry is pending and tiil date she has not been yunisl ed by the department. In View of the averment de in this petition it aypears that junior to the oet‘Etioner has ( een promotes, Comlsel for the pefitioner submits that he may be yermitteti to wi!hdraw this petition wi’d’j liberty {o foe r semation before respondent N02. He fm‘iher submits tha almost £11 simiEar facts and the rmier dated 23.8.2010 iAnnexure P—4} in W.P.{S} NOV 5911f2010 and considering the said order, the. r spondent No.2 may be directec’t to decide the representation oft} e petittoaer 1'3 accordance with law. ‘ L circumsfanoes, this Comm h s passed ) i r l a ev e \ m mm amt m (We) WWW WWW Wmm WW W‘W $aimm is permitted to withdraw fhis per representatioa before the :eks from the date of receipt of Ls expected froui the competent ientation as expeditiousiy as aonths from the (tater of receipt Accordmgly, th€ petitioner petition with 1ibex1y to file pm respoadent N02 Within three WE copy of thiS order and in tum. it authorigf to decide the rep-res possible preferably within three 1 of copy of the sai(i representation. 1f gxiavaxlce of the petitiom open to the petitioner $0 take available to her under the law. 1r is not reriressezi, it would be recourse to such remedy as Sd/- Prinker Diwaker Judge y];__A ;ee M it g