1 Cri.Appln.No.3712/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3712/2010 Barada Parasanna s/o Girishchandra Patnaik - APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Mah. and Anr. - RESPONDENTS ***** Mr.BR Warma, Adv.h/for Mr. Ujwal Agrawal,Advocate for Applicant; Mr.KS Patil, APP for State. Mr.PS Shendurnikar, Adv. for Resp.No.2. ----- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 9th February, 2011. PER COURT : . Heard both sides. 2) Proceedings in terms of Section 498-A, 420, 468, 471 and 506(2) of Indian Penal Code, were initiated by the respondent no.2, the wife against her husband, the petitioner. 3) In affidavit in reply filed by Mr.Shendurnikar, on behalf of respondent/wife – Smt. Poona d/o Dhruvkumar Vasvani, she has in paragraph No.6 stated that the matter is amicably 2 Cri.Appln.No.3712/2010 resolved, settled between her and her husband, the petitioner. The respondent/wife does not press the allegations made in Criminal complaint, being RCC No. 218/2010 moved before learned JMFc, Chalisgaon. 4) In the light of above statement and considering the statement of Mr.Warma on behalf of petitioner/husband, that in the Family Court, the marital status of the petitioner and the respondent has been declared as null and void, the prosecution pursuant to Crime No.194/2010 dated 20.6.2010 registered against the petitioner, husband at Chalisgaon Police Station, referred above, deserves to be quashed and set aside and it is accordingly quashed and set aside. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/