IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28994 of 2008 CHHATARI YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 05.01.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. No one appears on behalf Opposite party no. 2 despite service report that notice by ordinary process was received by her father-in-law and the notice by registered acknowledgement due is stated to bear the endorsement of refused to accept. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a complaint case filed under Sections 376 and 342 of the Penal Code sent for investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Learned counsel emphasizes on subsequent compromise and referred to the impugned order of rejection noticing the previous litigation between the parties from the case diary. Previous litigation finds reference in the case diary is confirmed by the Additional Public Prosecutor. There is no medical report available in the case diary of the victim. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saharsa in Bakhtiyarpur (Balba Hat O.P.) P.S. case No.141 of 2006, subject to the conditions laid down under 2 Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Let the trial itself be concluded within six months and a compliance report be submitted to this Court. The court below shall take all coercive measures for appearance of the parties including the petitioner and for which the present order of anticipatory bail shall be no impediment. If the prosecution fails for reason of the prosecution not supporting the allegation, the court below is directed to proceed appropriately against all concerned under Chapter XI of the Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure in that regard. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)