IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25817 of 2010 PAPPU SINGH, S/o Aditya Singh. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 13.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 364 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. By order dated 16.12.2009 vide Cr. Misc. No. 41566 of 2009 the petitioner was refused bail on the ground that he had remained absconding for four years but on the undertaking of the informant the trial was expected to be expedited. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail on the ground that till date only one witness has been examined and the prosecution is not taking any interest in the matter. A report was called for from the Trial Court in this regard from which it appears that only one out of twenty nine witnesses have to be examined in this case. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named who is in custody since 31.07.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 2 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-II, Nawada in connection with S.Tr. No. 384 of 2009/ 328 of 2009 arising out of Hisua P.S. Case No. 65 of 2005 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the wife of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. In view of the antecedents of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Supdt. 3 of Police, Nawada within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and thereafter every two weeks for the next one year. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in this period by the S.P. concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)