IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2011 SHRI BABULI MAHADEV NAIK AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus SHRI. JAYANT S.S. KHANDEPARKAR ... Respondent Mr. S.D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. Kankonkar, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. R. G. Ramani, Advocate for the Respondent. Coram:- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date:- 5th May, 2011 P.C.:- Heard Mr. Lotlikar, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants and learned Counsel, Mr. Ramani appearing on behalf of the Respondent. 2. In the light of the admission of the Second Appeal and substantial questions of law framed for consideration, prima facie case is made out. Even the balance of convenience is in favour of the Applicants. They will suffer grave loss if Judgement and Decree under challenge is allowed to be implemented and executed. 3. In these circumstances, there will be an interim order in terms of prayer clause (a) till the hearing and final disposal of the Appeal. Civil Application is allowed with no order as to costs. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. EV