THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.15505 of 2010 Dated: 02.07.2010 Between: M.Syamala Gowri …petitioner And The APSRTC rep. by its Managing Director and two others …Respondents The Court made the following ORDER: Though Sri K.Srinivasa Rao, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents, strenuously contended that the matter is not covered by judgment of this Court dated 20.04.2010 in Writ petition No.8846 of 2010, on examination of the matter, I am of the considered opinion that this is also a case where no enquiry was conducted in spite of making an allegation of unauthorised absenteeism. Hence, the issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition is squarely covered by the aforesaid judgment. Therefore, this writ petition is liable to be allowed in terms of the said judgment. The writ petition is accordingly allowed. Order dated 29.06.2007 passed by respondent No.3 and proceedings dated 23.12.2008 issued by respondent No.2 are hereby set aside. The respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner into service. It is needless to mention that the petitioner is entitled to all the benefits, which are extended to similarly placed employees. It is made clear that if there is any misconduct on the part of the petitioner, this order will not preclude the respondents to conduct enquiry against her and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU,J Dated 2nd July, 2010 vrn