ESA No. 8 of 2010(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ESA No. 8 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: February 25 , 2010 Smt. Pushpawati ...... Appellant Versus Tara Chand Nuniwala Dharmarth Trust Narnaul and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.S.K.Yadav, Advocate for the appellant. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This appeal has been filed against concurrent orders of the Courts below dismissing the objections of the appellant. Respondent-Trust filed ejectment petition against Babu Lal and Prabh Dayal. The said ejectment petition was allowed and appeal against that was also dismissed. When the respondent filed execution petition the appellant(who is daughter- in-law of Prabh Dayal aforementioned) took up the plea that in fact she was the tenant of the premises and not Prabh Dayal and that further she has not been impleaded as a party in the ejectment petition and order of ejectment was invalid. Both the Courts have on fact disbelieved her version that she was a tenant in the demised premises. Learned counsel has not proposed ESA No. 8 of 2010(O&M) 2 any question of law and has only argued that the findings of the Courts below on the issue whether the appellant was a tenant are incorrect. I have not been able to persuade myself that the findings of the Courts below are either based on no evidence or based on such perverse misreading of evidence so as to be liable for interference by this Court. Consequently this appeal is dismissed. Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE February 25 , 2010 sunita