IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2011 / 10TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23813 of 2011(B) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ LAIJUDAS, S/O.UNNIDAS, VAZHATHARA HOUSE, KUDAVECHOOR POST ,VECHOOR VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.P.KURUVILLA JACOB, SRI. RAJI.P.JOY. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADHARSHINI HILL POST, PIN-685 060,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADHARSHINI HILLS POST, PIN-685 060,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G. UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/09/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.23813/2011 B APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE PETITIONER HALL-TICKET DTD. NIL WITH REGISTRATION NO.50735 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF SECOND RESPONDENT. P2: COPY OF THE MARK SHEET PUBLISHED BY M.G.UNIVERSITY IN CONNECTION WITH PETITIONER'S 5TH SEMESTER B.COM DEGREE EXAMINATIONS HELD IN NOVEMBER 2010. P3: COPY OF THE PRESCRIBED APPLICATION FORM DTD. 20/06/11 DULY FILLED BY PETITIONER AND SUBMITTED TO SECOND RESPONDENT REQUESTING FOR REVALUATION OF HIS RAILED SUBJECT. P4: COPY OF THE PAY-IN-SLIP DTD. 20/06/11 ISSUED FROM M.G.UNIVERSITY FOR PAYMENT OF RS.250/- TOWARDS REVALUATION FEE. P5: COPY OF PETITIONER'S LETTER DTD. 27/07/11 SENT TO SECOND RESPONDENT REQUESTING TO CONDUCT NECESSARY REVALUATION OF HIS ANSWER SHEET IN HIS FAILED SUBJECT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 23813 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Com Degree Course. When the result of the 5th Semester examination was declared, he had failed in one paper. He applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-