IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 15277 of 2000 Between: 1 Kinthada Subrahmanyam, S/o.Late K.Satyam, R/o.Vizianagaram. 2 Smt. Kinthada Jayalakshmi W/o.K.Subrahmanyam, R/o.Vizianagaram. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 S.I. of Police, Womem Police Station, Vizianagaram. 2 S.I. of Police, 2 town Police Station, Vizianagaram. 3 The S.P. of Police, Vizianagaram. 4 The Director General of Police, A.P., Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the 1st Respondent herein in summoning the petitioners to the Women Police Station, Vizianagaram, time and again without following the due process of law, as arbitrary, illegal and unjust by issuing any appropriate Writ of Mandamus or any other writ. Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. T. Raghu representing Mr.M.V.S.Suresh Kumar Counsel for Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: Sri T. Raghu, representing Sri M.V.S. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause of action in this writ petition does not survive, and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording his submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _____________________ V.V.S. RAO, J. 6th July, 2005 Js To 1 S.I. of Police, Womem Police Station, Vizianagaram. 2 S.I. of Police, 2 town Police Station, Vizianagaram. 3 The S.P. of Police, Vizianagaram. 4 The Director General of Police, A.P., Hyderabad. 5 Two CCs to G.P. for Home, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. 6 2 CD copies.