IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1102 of 2008 SADAN PRASAD SON OF LATE MAHABIR RAM, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA SALIMPUR AHRA, P.O.- & P.S.- KADAMKUAN, DISTRICT- PATNA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. BADRI PRASAD, SON OF LATE NAZIR RAM, 3. CHINTA DEVI, WIFE OF BADRI PRASAD 4. OM PRAKASH, SON OF BADRI PRASAD 5. JAI PRAKASH, SON OF BADRI PRASAD. 6. BHOLA PRASAD, SON OF LATE AMBIKA PRASAD. 7. RAM RASIK PRASAD @ BRITESH RAM, SON OF LATE PALTON PRASAD ALL RESIDENTS OF MOHALLA SALIMPUR KHRA, P.O.- & P.S.- KADAM KUAN, DISTRICT- PATNA. ----------- 3 22.07.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instruction in the matter. He is, therefore, unable to make any submission. From the marginal notes, it appears that the application already stood rejected in default against O.P. nos. 2 to 7. The complainant has filed the present case aggrieved by the order dated 24.6.2008 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna whereby the opposite parties herein were tried and acquitted. Since it has already been rejected as against O.P. nos. 2 to 7, the application has, therefore, become incompetent. It is accordingly rejected. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )