(1) WP.2005.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2005 OF 2010 Manohar S/o Namdeo Chavan and anr. .. Petitioners VERSUS Sou Usha W/o Sopanrao Gandale .. Respondent Mr. Milind M. Patil (Beedkar), Advocate for the Petitioners ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 9TH JULY, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. Heard learned counsel. The petitioners are husband and wife inter-se. The petitioner no.1 is real brother of the respondent. It appears that the respondent filed suit for injunction simplicitor claiming to be in possession of the suit land on the basis of compromise decree which was rendered in the earlier suit between her parents. The petitioners resisted the suit claiming themselves to be in actual possession. The case of the petitioners was that the terms of the compromise decree were not acted upon and that the decree was not rendered with consent of (2) WP.2005.2010 the petitioner no.1. The trial Court noticed that entries in the revenue record indicated the factum of possession in favour of the respondent (plaintiff). The temporary injunction order was therefore passed in her favour. The first appellate Court also confirmed such order while dismissing the appeal. 2. There are concurrent findings of fact. No perversity is reflected from the orders impugned. Hence the Petition is dismissed. The trial Court shall expedite the hearing of the suit and dispose it of at the earliest. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp