IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 33 (SS) of 2010 Vinod Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Ors. …Respondents Shri Gopal Narain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sunil Upadhyay, Advocate holding brief of Mr. B.D. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the respondents. Dated: January 14, 2010 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. (Urgency Application No. 204 of 2010) Heard Shri Gopal Narain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Sunil Upadhyay, Advocate holding brief of Shri B.D. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the respondents on urgency application. Learned counsel for the respondents also submitted that Urgency application be allowed. Accordingly, urgency application is allowed. WPSS No. 33 of 2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of this petition the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to take decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 29.07.2009 be issued. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a sweeper and the respondents are going to disengage him by engaging another person in his place, due to this reason indulgence of this Court is required. He prayed 2 that respondent no. 2 be directed to take decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 29.07.2009 (contained in Annexure-5 to the writ petition) at the earliest so that injustice may not be done. Learned counsel for the respondents also agreed for the same. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent no. 2 to take decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 29.07.2009 (contained in Annexure-5 to the writ petition) within a period of three weeks’ from the date of production of certified copy of the order. The respondents will take decision as per rules/regulations and also in accordance with law. (V.K. Bist, J.) Vacation Judge VKG 14.01.2010