IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.263 of 2011 Manoj Kumar Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ------ 04 10.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Earlier petitioner, who has been declared juvenile in conflict with law, moved this Court in Cr. Rev. no. 980 of 2010. This Court by order dated 12.07.2010, rejected the prayer for his release from remand home/custody with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after 06 (Six) months if all the prosecution witnesses in the meanwhile were not examined. In the light of said observation the present application has been filed seeking his release from the remand home/custody. A status report was called for by order dated 09.03.2011 which is on record. It appears therefrom that till date of report (13.07.2011) only one prosecution witness could be examined. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in remand home/custody since 11.03.2010. Relying on averments made in paragraph no. 12, it is contended that there is no criminal antecedent of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that mother of the petitioner has filed affidavit in support of the present application and she is ready and willing to take responsibility respecting the petitioner in case he is released from the remand home. Learned counsel further submits that the mother of the petitioner, namely, Pramila Devi wife of Sri Awadh Kishore Singh would be one of the bailors in case this Court directs the release of the petitioner. 2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed. Let petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the J.J. Board, Chapra in connection with Juvenile Trial no. 475 of 2010 ( New Juvenile Trial No. 370 of 2011) arising out of Taraiya P.S. case no. 104 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be the mother of the petitioner. (ii) It shall be the duty of the aforesaid bailor to monitor the conduct of the petitioner and to ensure that he does not fall in the company of known criminals/bad elements. She will also ensure presence of the petitioner in Court on the date(s) fixed therefor. In case of default in such appearance without there being compelling reasons therefor, the trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (iii) During subsistency of the present privilege if it is found that petitioner has involved himself in another criminal case the same shall be treated as a breach of the condition of bail entailing cancellation. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )