i^ ^^ '8RT R^Jcb WT 3TT^ff »»*ii<ft r!: <'^ NI^WII a»ii<(» "3^ ^l^ld^l, ^'alwi(o, I^<rii<H^< , WP.CS>(^-"?]3^/o? ^...^^...^...............................^^Q ^n^T'q^RT (^qi^^) ^«11<<R^ (t ^il^i pjBTlTloNBK S,R. Dhm^ 59 years, Versus KESPOKDKJNTS 1. 2, 3. 4. Seciiriiy G Railway, j, S/o late B.R. Dhruw, aged about Sub Inspector, R,P,F, Intemal Iranch, Soutli Easteni, Central, Bil^spiir (CG) CONSTiTU SBs HON. »HPJDHIPJENDP-A M 5-1-2GC® Shri F.S, Khare, Advocate; Shri Amit Choudhary, Ce: respondents, The petitioner who is ser Protection Force, was de-catej petitioner preferred appeal ag^ AppeUate AiiUiority i,e, RaiTwa^ was rejected wifh observation 1 uiterference, The petitiouer b^ cM<<t^<ilwi 'RIwff ^ 't^^ <S^t^l< ^ ^fRw ^1^1 Soum E^astem Central Railway Bilaspur, through (tlie Inspector General R,P,F., Rail Bhawaii, |New Dellii Chief Se^urity Officer, R.P.R. SouUi Eastem C-entral I^ailway, Biiaspur (CG) StaiY Offij^er, oifice of Chief Security Officer, R,P.F. ^outli Eastem Central Railway, BilaspurICG) Senior ^Iedical Officer, Railway Hospital, Soutli E^steni C/eutral Rauway, Bflaspur (CG) Iw^JT PETiTiON UNDB&ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE TION OP INDiA ISHPJL, J for the petitioner. jitral Govt. StandSg Counsel, for tlie serfioLg as Sub Inspector ia the Railway ^onzed on fhe medical report. The ag^-mst the above decision before Uic Medical Boaixl, However, Uie same tlhat the medical certificate needs no }iag aggrieved by tiie above omer, ^1^^4 ^iW^U^ <M^S<A»H—FS/9S—11/2008—1,00,000. <tWCTI <»»»<1«1» ^"^r ^i^Krt^i/ ^xi1<H4i^ I^cni^y ^.-MiLi2^..;.2i.lll'6i ^...^^.;....^.^«........................^200 w^i i^<^ (yii^^) 3ii^T "^tRl^ WITSn^T^RW n- ^«iw<tii^a hbs petiti^ner preferred another appeal before| Protection Force as per rules however the respondent No, 1 by tlie petitioner and the monfhs. Learued counsel for the niay be disposed ofwith a dtrectil the departaientai appeal preferre^ penocl, Leanied cozinsel appearin^ tlie appeal preferred by the witii law withiii a period of t^o certified copy ofUiis order, In view of fhe subniission o| tlie iiistaiit petition is disposed o^ to decide fhe departmental appeajl 2 Bionths froin the date of producjtion the Inspector General of Rallway t?n 9-12-2008 vide Ai-inexure P-1, |is not decided Uie appeal prefeiTecl is due for retirement withiii 6 ^titioner submits fhat this petition |ju to me respondent No, 1 to decide by fiie petitioner withm a specified petiti^ner 4tM{d^ ^l^dl'^'fe1^ <F3i^d< ^3tRTH3?n^i for the respondents subniits that shall be decided m accordaiice |nionUis froni Uie date of receipt of ' the leai-ned counsel for tlie parties, wifii a direction to the respondents of Aiinexure P~ l^^ifliiii a period of of a certified copy of fhis order. Sd7- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^IT^Wt^U^K^ <!^'!K<tM—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.