IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARAYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.427 of 2011 Date of Decision: February 21, 2011 Harjit Singh and others ….petitioners Versus The State of Punjab ….respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. Vinod Arya, Advocate for the petitioners. **** RITU BAHRI, J.(ORAL) Challenge in the present revision petition is to order dated 23.12.2010, whereby an application under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been allowed and the petitioners have been summoned to face trial. Mr. Vinod Arya, Advocate, counsel for the petitioners has argued that merely on the basis of statement of Nirmaljit Singh-PW-5 petitioners have been summoned to face trial. No other evidence was projected before the trial court so as to come to the conclusion that the accused be summoned were liable for conviction on the basis of the evidence. In the order dated 23.12.2010 after recording the statement of Nirmaljit Singh-PW-5, he was cross-examined at length by the counsel for the accused/petitioners. Even after the cross examination there were nothing against the prosecution version. The presence of the accused was not disputed. As per statement of Nirmaljit Singh, he has attributed specific role to the petitioners in respect of injuries caused by them. In view of the above, the present revision petition is dismissed. 21.02.2011 (RITU BAHRI) vcgarg JUDGE