(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.142 OF 2001 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.142 OF 2001 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.142 OF 2001 Dr. Mrs. Usha Shrirang Yadav ...Petitioner Versus The Principal, Willingdon College, Sangli & Anr ...Respondents ..... Mrs. V.S. Mhaispurkar, counsel for Petitioner Mr. P.S. Dani, counsel for Respondent No.1. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 14TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 14TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 14TH FEBRUARY, 2005 P.C.: - P.C.: - P.C.: - 1. Mrs. Mhaispurkar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the writ petition No. 9817 of 2003 filed by the petitioner has been allowed by the Division Bench on 28.1.2005 and certain directions have been issued afresh against the Joint Director, Higher Education at Pune. This Contempt Petition was moved alleging that the directions given by the University and College Tribunal at Pune in its judgment dated 10.4.2000 against the Joint Director, Higher Education to release the salary of the petitioner on her full time post of teacher w.e.f. 1.12.1994 onwards were not implemented. The learned counsel rightly submitted that as at present these (-2-) directions given by the Tribunal have merged in the order of this Court passed in Writ Petition No. 9817 of 2003 on 28.1.2005. Hence, she seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty. 2. Leave granted. The Contempt Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as is available in law.