WPMS No.903 of 2008 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate for respondent no.2. Learned counsel for the parties state that this writ petition has become infructuous after the expiry of period of licence (Termination of licence was challenged by the petitioner before the said date of expiry). In the above circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 30.9.2011 Rdang