IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1634 of 2009 Md. Ansar Khan, S/O Late Haroon Khan, resident of village - Leha War , P.S. Keoti , Distt – Darbhanga, at Present Address : Resident of Mohalla- Madhepura , P.S. & Distt – Madhepura. ………….Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Taiyaka Khatoon, D/O Late Sasiur Rahman Khan, resident of village – Lehawar , P.S.-Keoti, Distt – Darbhanga. ……….Opposite Parties ---------------------------------- 4. 08.12.2011 The husband-petitioner has preferred this revision application against the order dated 27.01.2009 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Darbhanga in Maintenance Case No.82/2003 by which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.6000/-per month for the maintenance of his wife and three daughters. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that admittedly the petitioner was the husband of the opposite party no.2. She has been divorced and she has also married with another man. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the petitioner has filed his written statement, but has not adduced any evidence in support of his contention. After considering all the materials, the 2 learned Principal Judge has passed the impugned order on the basis of evidence on the record. Considering the facts and circumstances stated above, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. However, the petitioner is at liberty to raise his grievance before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Darbhanga in accordance with law. This revision application stands disposed of. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)