IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3950/2010 Decided on:26.11.2010 _____________________________________________ Rajinder Singh. …Petitioner. Versus Himachal Pradesh University and another. …Respondents. _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. B.C. Negi, Advocate for respondent No.1. None for respondent No.2. ____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 3.7.2010 whereby he has been transferred to Cash Section. He is to retire within a period of one year and six months. In view of this, Mr. B.C. Negi was requested to seek instructions from the Vice-Chancellor whether petitioner can be adjusted/posted in other Branch. Consequently, Mr. B.C. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 Negi, on the basis of the instructions imparted to him by the worthy Vice-Chancellor, submits that the petitioner can be adjusted in other Branch within a period of one week from today. In view of the categorical undertaking, as noticed above, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be a direction to the respondent-University to adjust/post the petitioner in any other Branch within a period of one week from today. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 26.11.2010 *awasthi*