IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. (SS) 863 of 2011 Smt. Reenu and others. ….Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …..Respondents Present : Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N. P. Sah, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. N. P. Sah, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. The petitioners were working in different Government Inter Colleges and were transferred/adjusted vide order dated 9.6.2011 passed by Additional Director, Education, Garhwal Mandal Pauri to different upgraded High Schools. Consequently these orders have been cancelled vide order dated 16.6.2011 passed by Secretary, Government of Uttarakhand. Hence, the present writ petition. In other similar matters, the writ petitions were disposed of with the direction to the Secretary Education, Government of Uttarakhand to decide this controversy considering each case on its own merits. Learned counsel appearing for the present petitioners Sri Parikshit Saini has made a statement at the bar that this writ petition has the same facts and therefore is covered by the said order. Consequently, learned Standing Counsel Sri N. P. Sah also admits this factual position. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with same terms and conditions as 2 in order-dated 1.7.2011 passed in Writ Petition No. (SS) 645 of 2011. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 15.07.2011 Kuldeep