IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32122 of 2011 Dharmraj Yadav son of Ramnath yadav R/o village Chhatanwara, P.S. Krishna Brahm, District Buxar ……..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar …………………….Opposite Party. ---------------------------------- 2 13.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is accused in Buxar (M) P.S. Case No. 69 of 2009 registered for the offence under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of F.I.R. it appears that on the basis of written report of one Bishunu Kumar Choudhary first information report was registered against five unknown persons and the petitioner has been falsely implicated on the basis of only confessional statement of c0-accused. The order dated 11.8.2011 whereby the prayer of the petitioner for bail is rejected by the Sessions Judge Ist Buxar shows that the name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of co-accused Sohan Shukla & Sonu Chaudhary. It is also submitted that in same case accused Sohan Shukla and Sonu Choudhary has been acquitted on 16.3.2010. 2 Learned A.P.P. does not point out any incriminating material against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Buxar in connection with Buxar (M) P.S. Case no. 69 of 2009. Out of the two sureties one of the bailors must be parent of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) M.Rahman