IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 21ST FEBRUARY 2011 / 2ND PHALGUNA 1932 RP.No. 118 of 2011(U) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.167/2011 Dated 11/01/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- SHIRLY DANIEL, W/O.ROBERT MATHEW, JAISON VILLA, KOLLAKADAVU, CHENGANNUR FROM CHAWEKAYIL,CHERIYANADU, KOLLAKADAVU, C HENGANNUR(UPSA , APNM CMS UP SCHOOL, KULATHUPUZHA). BY ADV. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND SRI.T.NIKLAVU RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,GENERAL EDUCATIOINAL DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PUNALUR 691 305. 3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIIONAL OFFICER, ANCHAL 691 306. 4. THE CORPORATE MANAGER, CMS SCHOOLS, DIOCESE OF MADHYA KERALA DIOCESAN OFFICE,BISHOP GIL MEMORIAL BUILDING, CATHEDRAL ROAD, KOTTAYAM 686 001. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI T.T.MUHAMMED THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ R.P.No.118/2011 in W.P.(C). No.167/2011-U ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 21 st day of February, 2011 O R D E R The review petition is filed by the petitioner pointing out that subsequent to the Judgment, the Assistant Educational Officer passed Annexure-1(2) order whereby appointment of one Smt.C.Ammini, U.P.S.A has been approved as Headmistress in A.P.N.M.C.M.S U.P.School, Kulathupuzha from 01/04/2010 onwards in the retirement vacancy of one Smt.J.Lillykutty, Headmistress. It is further pointed out that a permanent vacancy has been established. 2. In the Judgment in writ petition, this Court directed the District Educational Officer to pass orders within a period of one month after noticing that the approval of appointment of Smt.C.Ammini as teacher- in-charge was granted. It is pointed out that even though the approval has been granted as Headmistress itself, as there is no specific direction in the R.P.No.118/2011 -:2:- Judgment, respondents are refusing to consider the same. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. The Judgment is dated 11/01/2011 and Annexure-1(2), the order passed by the Assistant Educational Officer, is dated 03/02/2011, which is issued subsequent to the Judgment. It is open to the petitioner to produce a copy of Annexure-1(2) order before the second respondent and the effect of the same will be considered. The review petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE