IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1077 of 2008. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1077 of 2008. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1077 of 2008. Mahmood Anwar Poonawala ..Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.A.R.Patil, APP for the State CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. R.Y.GANOO, JJ. R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED : 4th July, 2008. DATED : 4th July, 2008. DATED : 4th July, 2008. P.C. 1. The impugned orders rejecting the parole leave application submitted by the petitioners were already the subject matter of challenge in Criminal Writ Petition No.1109 of 2007 and the said petition came to be dismissed by the Division Bench on 27th July, 2007. 2. Even otherwise, Mr. Patil, learned APP submits that if the petitioner makes a fresh application thereby proposing the name of the surety who is a permanent resident of Mumbai, his fresh application will be considered on its own merits. -2- 3. The statement is recorded and the petition is disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh application. 4. This Order be communicated to the petitioner at the concerned jail. (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (B.H.Marlapalle, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (B.H.Marlapalle, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (B.H.Marlapalle, J.)