IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 55 of 2004 (M/B) Anuj Kumar S/o Sri Radhey Shyam, R/o Indra Vikas Colony, Sukhi Nadi, Khand Khandi, Police Station and District Haridwar, Uttaranchal. ……… Petitioner Versus 1. Nagar Palika Parishad, Haridwar, through Chairman, Nagar Palika Parishad, District Haridwar, Uttaranchal. 2. State of Uttaranchal, through District Magistrate, Haridwar. ……… Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondent No. 2. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner’s counsel absent. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for respondent No. 1 Nagar Palika Parishad, Haridwar. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondent No. 2. 2. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, the learned counsel for respondent No. 1 Nagar Palika Parishad, Haridwar submits that the present writ petition, now, has become infructuous, as the period of license, which was granted to the petitioner for the year 2004-2005, has already expired. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 14.06.2006 14.06.2006 G