IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 536 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- DHARVI KANJI BHIMABHAI Versus HAMIR PITHA DHARVI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR SURESH M SHAH for the Petitioner. MR MEHUL S SHAH for the Petitioner. MR RD DAVE for Respondent Nos. 1-3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR Date of decision: 07/02/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.Shah, learned Advocate for the petitioner, states that since the substantive suit is already disposed of by the trial court, this CRA, which is filed against an interlocutory order, will not survive. In view of the said statement, the CRA is disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged. Interim relief stands vacated. No order as to costs. 7th February, 2004 ( P.B. Majmudar, J. ) *** (apj)