IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32919 of 2009 1. RAM PUNIT RAI 2. SAROJANI KUMARI ------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Though the allegation is against the petitioners also but mostly that is against the husband. Earlier also a complaint case was lodged making every allegation for the offence under section 498A IPC, that was reconciled. Thereafter this case is lodged, as submitted a case is lodged on behalf of mother-in-law against the complainant’s family members, clearly it appears that it is a case of not adjusting each other for which considering allegation leveled under discussed circumstance can never justify refusal of anticipatory bail to the petitioners who are father-in-law and mother- in-law of the complainant. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Bhagwanpur P.S.Case No. 90 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)