WP(C) 5873/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Heard Mr. R Mazumdar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. P Gogoi, learned Central Govt. counsel appearing for the respondents. Considering the matter in its entirety and as agreed to by the learned c ounsel appearing for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage itself. The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a direction to the respondents to appoint the petitioner in the post of Constable General Duty in t he Central Reserve Police Force (for short, ’CRPF’). His further prayer is for a direction to the respondents to allow the petitioner to be examined by speciali sts in the filed of Radiology and to re-examine the difference of opinion of the Doctors. The petitioner’s case in brief is that on 16.04.2010, he received an off er of appointment from the respondents directing him to report to the DIGP, GC, CRPF, Dayapur, Silchar for joining as Constable (General Duty). Therefore, the p etitioner was sent to a private X-ray clinic for conduct of his medical tests. V ide communication dated 29.04.2010, the petitioner was informed that he had been declared unfit due to Opacity suggestive of pneumonitis (Lt) lung. The petition er was also informed that he could apply for review medical examination with a p roof of medical fitness certificate. The petitioner thereafter immediately appro ached the Radiology Department at the Silchar Medical College and Hospital (for short, SMCH) where he was examined and the Doctors of SMCH issued a certificate certifying him free from such deformity. Thereafter on being declared fit by the concerned specialist Doctor of the SMCH, the petitioner applied to the Deputy I nspector General of Police, Group Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Dayapur, Silchar for medical re-examination submitting the requisite medical fitness cer tificates. Consequent to the application filed by the petitioner vide letter dat ed 09.07.2010, he was asked to report to the Composite Hospital, CRPF, Guwahati on 07.08.2010 for review medical examination. The petitioner was also asked to b ring along admit card, call letter and proof of cure from the disease. The petit ioner, accordingly, reported for review medical examination on 07.08.2010 as dir ected. However, when the petitioner presented himself before the panel constitut ed for review medical examination, the panel instead of examining the petitioner themselves sent him to private hospital but he was not allowed to retain a copy of the test reports conducted on him. This time the authority without going thr ough the expert opinions of the SMCH verbally informed him that he would probabl y be again rejected as being medically unfit for appointment. The petitioner went to the same private hospital (Down Town Hospital, Gu wahati) by himself and the same Doctor of the said private Hospital has again co nducted tests on 08.08.2010 and reported that all findings regarding the petitio ner are within normal limits, clear and without any significant abnormality. The petitioner, thereafter, went to the Department of Radiology, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati (for short, GMCH) and again got himself tested. The Doctors of GMCH also did not find any untoward readings/findings wit h regard to the petitioner. In view of the above background, the petitioners further case is that th ere was no specialist Doctor in the field of Radiology in the Review Medical Boa rd constituted by the respondent authorities. Mr. Mazumdar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that there are findings of the specialist Doctors of SMCH and GMCH that the pet itioner is not suffering from Opacity suggestive of pneumonitis (Lt) lung, still , the Review Medical Board has rejected the candidature of the petitioner on the ground of suffering from Opacity suggestive of pneumonitis (Lt) lung disease. Though affidavit-in-opposition has not been filed by the respondent auth orities, Ms. Gogoi, learned Central Govt. counsel has produced the record of the case. I have perused the same. Upon perusal of the record, it would reveal tha t in the Review Medical Board, there was no specialist Doctor/Radiologist. In view of the above position, this Court deems it fit and proper to dir ect the respondent authorities to constitute the Review Medical Board afresh whe rein the petitioner’s case shall be considered by a Board consisting of two Medi cal Officers of CRPF and opinions of the specialist Doctor of Civil Government M edical College of concerned trade, where the petitioner has been declared unfit be obtained by way of review medical examination. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the res pondents to arrange the review medical examination of the petitioner. The review medical examination shall be done as expeditiously as possible preferably by 25 .03.2011. The writ petition is, accordingly disposed of. However, there shall be n o order as to costs.