1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.537 OF 2011 ARISING OUT OF NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1054 OF 2011 IN L.C. SUIT NO.911 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.745 OF 2011 M/s V.R.Advertisers ...Appellant. v. The M.C.G.M. And Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Birendra Saraf a/w Ms Neeta Solanki i/by Kiran Jain & Co. ,advs. For the Appellant. Ms K.K.Soran, adv. For the Respondent/BMC. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : JULY 15, 2011. P.C. 1 This appeal is preferred by the original plaintiff against the refusal of ad-interim injunction restraining the respondent/defendant from removing the structure erected for the purpose of displaying advertisement, hoarding, etc. Notice of motion is still pending. On 28th April, 2011, this Court had restrained the defendant/respondent from dismantling or removing structure subject to condition that the appellant will not display any advertisement, hoarding on the said structure. That order is till in operation. Reply to the notice of motion has not been filed so far. In view of the above, in my opinion, the appeal and the 2 application may be disposed off with the following direction: Respondent/defendant shall file reply and/or written statement before the trial Court within six weeks and the trial Court shall hear and dispose off the notice of motion within six weeks thereafter. Order passed by this Court on 29th April, 2011 shall continue to be in operation till decision of the notice of motion. 2 Appeal and the application stand disposed off accordingly. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)