1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2009 Nitin Tukaram Gawankar ........Applicant versus The Bombay Mun. Corporn. Gr. Bombay........ Respondents. Mr. A.C. Singh i/b.K.K. Pandey adv. for the Applicant Mr. J.J. Xavier adv. for the respondents CORAM: A. P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 13th MARCH, 2009. P.C.: 1. The present applicant is the original plaintiff who had filed a suit before the trial court calling in question the legality and validity of the action taken by the Corporation in demolishing the structure of the applicant/plaintiff. The suit has been dismissed. Hence the first appeal came to be filed which has been admitted. In this view of the matter allowing the present application would amount to granting the final relief which cannot be done at this stage. In the result, civil application is rejected. However, hearing of the appeal is expedited. Liberty to move after the record and proceedings are received and after the appeal is ready for hearing. Liberty is also granted to approach this court in case the possession of the land is interefered with. (A. P. DESHPANDE, J.)