CWP (T) No. 5477 of 2008 15.5.2010 Present: Mr.Ranjan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.R.M.Bisht, Dy. Advocate General, for the respondents. Even according to respondent-State the duties performed by the present petitioners are arduous in nature. They have been given only one prop-step up increment. The respondent-State itself has acknowledged the fact that there is stagnation in the cadre of monument attendants, which post the petitioner is holding for the last 20 years. This is evident from the return filed by the State. In the return, it is further averred that proposal for up- gradation/re-designation, providing promotional avenues and financial benefits is pending with the Government. My attention has been invited to the same, which is Annexure A-7. In these circumstances, the respondent-State is directed to consider the proposal sympathetically by taking into account the hardship faced by the petitioners. Admittedly there are no Recruitment and Promotion Rules in existence. As such the respondent-State shall frame Recruitment and Promotion Rules and/or evolve a scheme for providing promotional avenues and higher monetary benefits to the monument attendants appointed by the State. Needful be positively done within a period of six months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. The petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. 15th May, 2010 (Sanjay Karol) (C) Judge.