IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1524 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1524 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1524 OF 2006 IN APPEAL (L) NO.375 OF 2006 FROM NOTOCE OF MOTION NO.2708 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.2468 OF 2005 Wanbury Ltd. .. Appellant V/s Novartis A.G. & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.R.Chagla i/by M/s.D.H.Law Associates for the Appellant. Mr.V.A.Bhagat with Mr.Kiran J.Mehta for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 5. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 9th August, 2006. DATE : 9th August, 2006. DATE : 9th August, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion the Appellant is seeking condonation of 16 days delay caused in filing the Appeal. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay caused in filing the Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence of want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. The learned Counsel fo the Appellant undertakes to get the Appeal numbered within a period of two weeks from today. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)