C.W.P. No. 8848 of 2009 Ashok Kumar and others vs. State of Haryana and others Present: Mr. Girish Agnihotri, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Binayjeet Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioners. *** Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that in a similar case arising out of that very selection a Division Bench in CWP No. 19705 of 2008 decided on 19.11.2008 has passed the following order :- “Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner will be satisfied, if his representation (Annexure P-8) is decided within a stipulated period. Respondent No.1 i.e. The Transport Commissioner, Haryana, Chandigarh is directed to take all aspects of the case of the petitioner into consideration and decide the representation (Annexure P-8) by passing a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receiving of a copy of this order. Petitioner would be at liberty to file a fresh petition on the same and net set of facts after his representation is decided. With the above observations and directions, petition is disposed of.” Learned Senior Advocate states that he would be satisfied if respondent No.3 is directed to decide the representation Annexure P-8 filed by the petitioners within any reasonable time by passing a speaking order thereon. C.W.P. No. 8848 of 2009 -2- In view of the decision of the Division bench a direction is issued to respondent No.3 to decide the representation Annexure P-8 by passing a speaking order thereon within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE May 30, 2009 sunita