Crl. Misc. No. M-35190 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-35190 of 2011 Date of Decision: November 22, 2011 Satya Parkash Tyagi …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. B.B. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner seeks the quashing of FIR on the ground that there are absolutely no allegations against the petitioner in the FIR and no specific overt act has been attributed to him. I have heard counsel for the petitioner and gone through the FIR. Counsel for the petitioner submits that till date the challan has not been presented and the prosecution agency has not opted to present any challan against the petitioner. Crl. Misc. No. M-35190 of 2011 [2] In view of the said circumstances, it will be premature to express any opinion whether the circumstances warrant the quashing of FIR on the basis of the material gathered by the prosecution agency against the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though there is no allegation against the petitioner, the police is unnecessarily harassing the petitioner. The petitioner had merely gone to resolve the dispute being an ex-Sarpanch. This petition is disposed of as premature with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case he has got an apprehension of arrest. November 22, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDG