.?'?a32;%, ^i-'ii. ^-fa ^sy' Ei v^sssy"vti 9 t^^^''/ ^ g -/s 3^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH AT BILASPUR DB: Hon'ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra & Hon'ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar. JJ. W.P.(S)No. 902 of 2011 Pradeep Kumar Soni, S/o Late Shri Amrit Lal Sonl, aged about 32 years, Unempioyed, Residing at : Village Masturi, Post - Masturi - 495551, Distt.- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Vs. 1. Union of India, Through : The General Manager, South East Central Railway, BilaspurZone S.E.C. Rly. General Manager's Office, Bilaspur-495001 (C.G.) 2. The Secretary, Railway Recruitment Board, Besides General Manager's Office, S.E.C. Railway, Head Quarters Complex, Bilaspur - 4Q5001 (C.G.) Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Present: Shri Ashok Swarnakar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Abhishek Sinha, counsel for the respondents. O R A L O R D E R (Passed on 14th February, 201 1) Per Dhirendra Mishra J Heard. 1. This writ petition is directed against the impugned order dated 23.12.2010 (Annexure P/7) passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench, Circuit Sitting at Bilaspur (for short, "the Tribunal"), whereby the petitioner's original application has been dismissed as withdrawn. 3f 2. After going through the impugned order, it is observed that learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted a memo of withdrawal of his case before the Tribunal and the Tribunal has dismissed the original application as withdrawn. Therefore, in our considered opinion the petitioner cannot now be permitted to assail finding recorded in the impugned order by way of writ petition particularly without detailing the circumstances in which the applicant has filed an application for withdrawal of his original application. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition is liable to be dismlssed and is herebydismissed. Sd/- Dhu-endra Mishra Judge Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge