g HH$H COURT OF GHHATT§$GARH AT aiLASFUR Wr§t Petition (S) No. 3?93 of 2997 Petmoner Laxman Sihgh, S/o Shri Ram Singh, Aged about — 29 years, R/o Biock 11/0 Street No.1, Sector 4, Bhilai Tehsi! Dismct Burg, (1G. Ver5us g Respendent 1. Union cf India, Through the Secretary, Ministry of Labour, Govt. ‘cr india, New Dew 2. Steel Authoriiy of india Limited, Through its Managing Director, Bhiiai Steei Piant, Ispat Bhawan, Bhiiai Nagar. Tehsii & District Durg (C.G.) 1)‘’ UJbml ml\ Manager (Personnel — Recruitment) Bhiiai Steei iani, Bhiiai, Districi Burg, (CG) Assam Kumar Slo Dewaji Borkar Rakesh Yadav Sic Laiman Yadav Mirza irfan Baig S/o Mirza Masood Bai§ EEhrinivas S/o Shanker Harendra Kumar S/o Lt. Kaiiash $ingh All RM to RIB are represented through Clo Manager (Personnel- Recruitment) Bhiiai Steel Plant, Bhilei, District Burg, (C.G.) Writ Petitien ander Article 226 of the Constitution Of India Singie Bench : Hon'bie Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Present : Shri Jitendra Gupta, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Anupam Dubey, Advocate on behalf of Thakur Viiay Singh Asst. Soiicitor General. oRoER (Passed on this 2““ day or Jury, 2097) (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that pursuant to advertisement dated 25.03.2097 (Annexure P-2) the petitioner eppiied for appointment on the post of Fire Engine Driver cum Pump Gperetor. According to iearneti counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is foiiy qiiaiitied for the said poet. (2) He further submits that the performance of the petitioner is better than other candidates in the interview. as well as in t .e physical test. Despite having beRer performance, the pet€€§aner coukj net be $elected and :he respondents are proceeding w§th the seiectBon process. (3) The pet§tioner has no: submmed any dacumem, except his se!fsame statement ta the fact mat he §s beuer quaiifa‘w, H is we” knownthat when a person appears in the exam he feels that he is {he beet and better quaiifted. in absence ef necessary documents, it is not possibie ta accept the mei'e statement of the petitioner. Even etherwise, there is no sembiance of any iight or breach ihereef tc invoke exira ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of indie. summariiy. (4) The petition tacks materiai facts and merit. it is thus. ciisrnissed Karuna Sd/- i J i Satish K.Agnihotri ‘ i i Judge