THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.795 of 2002 DATED: 15-07-2010 ORDER: This revision is filed by the petitioner, who was examined as R.W.1, questioning the judgment, dated 06-04-2000, passed in M.C.No.3 of 1999 by the learned Family Judge, Kurnool. 2. The brief facts are that the 1st respondent and the petitioner are wife and husband and the petitioner has been working as a driver in Sri Ramadas Motor Transport Company, the head office of which is located at Kakinada, and during their wedlock the 1st respondent gave birth to three sons and three daughters. While so, the petitioner herein was putting the 1st respondent to all sorts of ill-treatment and also developed illicit intimacy with a lady by name Bujjamma and as he was transferred to Kakinada he was not visiting the family nor providing any money for their maintenance and the respondents herein have no source of income to maintain themselves and they became destitutes and as such, they filed the Maintenance Case and the learned Family Judge by order, dated 06-04-2000, while rejecting the claim of the respondents 1 and 2 herein, directed the petitioner herein to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.300/- each to the respondents 3 and 4 herein. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred the present revision. 3. During the course of trial, 1st respondent herein was examined as examined as P.W.1 and the 3rd respondent herein was examined as P.W.2. Petitioner herein was examined as R.W.1. No documentary evidence has been adduced on either side. 4. Notices were not served on the respondents. Having analyzed the entire evidence on record, the learned Family Judge, granted maintenance to the respondents 3 and 4 herein. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that the impugned order needs no interference. 5. Accordingly, Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. _______________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA,J 15th July, 2010. Tsy