IN THE mGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION ( C 1 No. •^0 PETITIONER -•:-'y^^"' RESPONDENTS /2011 Nari Utthan Sewa. Sanstha, through its President, Resham Kuniari Avinashi, W/o Shri Samai Das Avinashi, aged about 57 years, R/oVillage and Post - Paragarh, District - Janjgu-- Champa(C.G.) VERSUS r State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, Hoine Departinent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur, District - Raipiu- (C.G.). Manager, P. & G. S. Life Insurance Corporation of India, through its Divisional Maiiager, P. 8s G. S. Unit, Divisional OfEtce, Pandri Raipur,, Dista-ict Raipur (C.G.). 3. Life Insuraace Corporation of India, Pension aad Group Departraent, Regional Of6ce, Bhopal, District Bhopal (M.P.) 4. Life Insuranee Corporati.on of India, Pension and Group Deparfaient, Divisional Of&ce, Raipur, Distaict Raipur (C.G.) WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 22&Oa<'T¥IE ^ CONSTmjnONOFINDIA \^-y ashoK 7 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 3011 OF 2011 PETITIONER RESPQNDENTS Nari Utthan Sewa Sanstha Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 of the Constitution of Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri SatishK.Agnihotn;J. ShriSunil Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. ShriShashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed onthis 15thdayofJune, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petjtion, if cause of action still survives.. 2. Leamedcounse! appearingfor otliersidehasno objection. 3. It isordered as praved for. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated observation. l"sa^ll:;,i.1, K.Agnihotri Judge *t..