1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2764 OF 2010 Shri Samarth Vidya Prasarak Mandal & another .. PETITIONERS VERSUS Mrs. RAtnamala w/o Sudhakar Kulkarni & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. V.J. Dixit, Senior Counsel instructed by Mr. L.V. Sangit, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.J. Godbole, Advocate for respondent no. 1. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 29th MARCH, 2010 PER COURT : 1 The application tendered by the petitioner / management seeking production of certain documents from the appellant / ex-employee of the school has been turned down by the school tribunal in view of order passed on 10-03-2010. Without going into the merits of the controversy involved in the matter, suffice it to observe that on account of failure by the appellant to furnish the documents as required by the petitioner / management, the management may advance the arguments based on such conduct before 2 the tribunal. If on the basis of the conduct of the employee, some adverse inference is required to be drawn, the management may insist the tribunal for drawing such an inference. However, the interlocutory order passed by the tribunal refusing to grant indulgence in favour of the management in compelling production of document by the appellant, need not be interfered with in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction conferred on this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition is devoid of substance hence stands rejected. 2 In view of dismissal of petition, pending civil application, if any, stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp2764.10.odt