IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Stay Application No.7612 of 2009 Interim Relief Application No.1692 of 2010 In Writ Petition No. 1474 of 2009 (M/S) Satpal Singh, S/o Sri Natha Singh, R/o Village Nanhera Anantpur, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. ……Petitioner. Versus 1. Apar Upziladhikari, Roorkee, District Haridwar. 2. Upziladhikari Roorkee, District Haridwar. …….Respondents. Mr. Siddhartha Sah, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. C.S.C. for the respondents. Dated: -13-04-2010 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought following reliefs:- (1) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to enable the petitioner to recover/charge amount of Rs. 50/- per month as parking fee of their two wheeler vehicles from the practicing advocates in Tehsil Parisar, Roorkee, District Haridwar. (2) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to reduce the contract amount payable by the petitioner to the respondents proportionately in case of failure by the respondents to enable the petitioner to recover/charge amount of Rs. 50/- per month as parking fee of their two wheeler vehicles from the practicing advocates in Tehsil Parisar, Roorkee, District Haridwar. 2 (3) Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. (4) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the letter for recovery dated 16-12-2009 issued by the respondent No.2 (annexure No.7 to the writ petition.) There are so many disputed questions of facts are involved and these facts only can be scrutinized after adducing the evidence by the parties. It is well settled that in writ jurisdiction, disputed question of facts cannot be decided. So far as these reliefs are concerned, these reliefs cannot be granted in the writ jurisdiction. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to file civil suit for redressal of his grievance, if so advised. With the said direction, the writ petition is dismissed. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. (B.S.Verma, J.) 13-04-2010 MK