IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 758 of 2010 Date of decision:- 26.7.2010 Santosh ......petitioner vs. K.K.Jalal and others ......respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. Ravi Kapur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aman Chaudhary, Addl. AG, Haryana HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) Though the State-respondents have prepared the demand drafts and the same have been sent to the petitioner but the same has not been accepted. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents has restored the financial assistance, though no appeal has been preferred by the State-respondent. Learned counsel for State-respondent has pointed out, as a special case, the payments were being made to the petitioner but subject to the decision of the SLP. It has been relied upon by the learned Single Judge wherein analytical decision has been taken in the matter of Rajkumari's case which was against Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Lts., and others. Learned counsel for the State-respondent wants to file the special leave petition against the orders passed by the Learned Single Judge. Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present contempt petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 26.7.2010 preeti