IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 711 OF 2011 MR. RAGHUNATH KRISHNANATH CHODANKAR REP. BY CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY DR. SMITA RAGHUNATH CHODANKAR., ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA, THROUGH THE SECRETARY (REVENUE), AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. Kankonkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. N. Kholkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE & U. V. BAKRE, JJ. Date:- 5th December, 2011 P.C.:- Mr. Lotlikar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this writ petition be considered as a representation made to respondent No.1 in so far as grievance of the petitioner for an alternate plot in view of the acquisition of the petitioner's plot. Learned Advocate General appearing for the respondents has no objection. 2. Accordingly, the petition filed by the petitioner be considered as a representation made to respondent No.1 for grant of alternate plot to the petitioner, in view of the acquisition of the property of the petitioner. Respondent No.1 to take appropriate decision within a period of eight weeks. 3. The writ petition stands disposed of. All contentions raised in the petition are kept open. A. P. LAVANDE, J. U. V. BAKRE, J. ssm.