^' \J\ ^* ^) '^ PETITIONERS :1, IN THE HIGH COURT OF BILASPUR AT CHHATTISGARH WRITPETITION (S) No. ^S.^ QP 2010 k-^fljt- ^- Heera/Chouhan, S/o. Rati Ram Chouhan, aged about 48 years, U.D.T. working at Middle School, Rudukela, Block Lailunga, Raigarh (C.G.) Bhagirathi Patel, S/o. Shri' Bhagat Ram Patel, aged about 55 Ud?-T' years^working at Govt. Middle ^''^;^ 3!rf6 /v 'a;-"^' ^f^^4^^ ., i^'^T^ ( • \ ,.,r'y3^^/, School Rudukela, Raigarh (C.G.). Lailunga, 4. Chinta Ram Patel, S/o. Sri Malik Ram Patel, aged about 56 years, Assistant Teacher, working at Govt. Primary School, Bhendimuda, Block Lailunga, District Raigarh (C.G.) Paramanand Yadav, S/o. Shri Paitari Ram Yadav, aged about 55 years, Assistant Teacher, working at Govt. Primary School, Mudagaon, Block Lailunga, Raigarh (C.G.) ^ VERSUS 1 • RESPONDENTS 1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretaiy, Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C. G.) 2) The Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D. K. S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C. G.) - -.4- / 's^ ^^ 3) The Assistant Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 4) District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 5) BIock Education Officer, Lailunga, District Raigarh (C.G.) h '^2-S3i&^&-^^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA —78 ^W^T ^HI^s ^^ ^P^^, ^Tll'H^Ko, f^^TRTy: M^...U>.\.£^.:..^^ ^TI^T^W ('^3^^) ^l^l^lf^TW ^^ff ^n^r^^iN' ^B : HOM'BLB MR. JUSTECB PRIT|NKBR DIWAKBR D9.11.2010 Naster, tiie saine has not been donfe. Counsel for the petitioiier fai^ly subiuits tiiat tiU date the ^etitioners have uot approached t] iprora.otion. I:a the facts and circunistanc^s of the case, tlie petitioiiers kre dn'ected to fil.e a detail.ed rep: I^TW^fN^T?^ ^^pft^ 'RW^ff ^ fe^ Tt^5K ^stRma^i Shri Ajay Kum.ar Barik, coun; ShriVaibhav Goverdhaa., P.L Grievance ofthe petitioners 4^ th.e ^resent petition i.s th.a.t iiough. they are entitled fbr ftieir p| ^el for the petitioBers, for tiie State. "om.otion to the post of Head bie departaient seekiiig their besentation before tlie res-p. JNo.4 and.iii tura tlie sam.e is expec|-.ed t'o be decided l-)y the said |su.th.ority in accordan.ee with law, a|s cxpeditiously as possible. Accordiiigly, th.e peti.tion is di^posed' of ^ Sd/- PritinkerDiwaker Judge