IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-6652 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: September 20, 2011 Arti & others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Sandeep, Advocate, for respondent No.4. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking directions to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners and respondent No.4 state that respondent No.4 got married to petitioner No.1. Marriage however is prohibited on account of degree of Crl. Misc. No. M-6652 of 2011 [2] prohibited relations under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Better sense has prevailed and respondent No.4 has agreed to get the marriage annulled. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.4 states that respondent No.4 shall make a statement to the effect that the marriage be annulled. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners, in the circumstances noticed above, contends that let this petition be disposed of as not pressed in view of the statement made on behalf of respondent No.4. 5. The petition is disposed of as not pressed. (AJAI LAMBA) September 20, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?