I' $- * tn + versus GNCT OF DELHI DRUGS CONTROL DEPARMENTNEW DELHI 2. According to the Petitioner the activiqv of under the category of permissible use as defined wP(c) No.2780/2010 IN THE HIGH COI]RT OF DELIII AT II-EW DELHI w.P.(c) 218012010 PUSI{PANJALI MEDICOS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. I\4rinal Bharti, Advocate )-- \--/ i Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, proxy counsel for Mr. N. Waziri, Standing Counsel. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MT,RALIDHAR ORDER 05.04.2010 CM No.443 L/201 0(exem ption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(O No.2180/2010 l. The Petitioner applied for grant of drug licence under the Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, Ig45 on24th February 2010. The business was to be run /.zh at Shop No. 9, Pushpanjali, Vikas Marg Extension, Karkardooma, Delhi - 110 092 for categories 20,2I,208 and 21B drugs. It is stated that the Government of National Capital Tenitory .of Delhi (GNCTD), Drugs Control Department has by a letter dated llft March 2010 kept the application pending on the ground that no drugs licence could be grzurted for running business in premises meant for residential use. ..... Respondent a 'chemist's shop' falls in Clause 15.6.3 (xv) of t- oh Page 7 of 2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified fur ,r'- Jl the Master Plan for Delhi 202I (MPD-2021). 3. In similar circumstances this Court has issued directions in WP(C) No.16588 of 2004 (Anil Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Dethi) and issued directions in WP(C) No. 1 1448 of 2009 (titled "Surinder Oberoi v. Govt. of NCT of Dethi") for consideration of the application for grant of a drugs licence aftei taking into consideration the provisions of the MPD- 202t. t- 4. Accordingly, it is directed that the Respondents shall consider and dispose of the application filed by the Petitioner after taking into consideration the provisions of the \/PD-2021. The drugs licence will not be denied to the Petitioner in case he satisfies the requirements and the criteria mentioned in MPD -202I. 5. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion whether the q Petitioner is eligible for grant of drugs licence on merits and satisfies the eligibility requirement. The application of the Petitioner will be considered in the order of seniority maintained by the respondents. Liberly is, however, granted to the Petitioner to ask for expeditious disposal. 6. The writ petition is disposed of. 7. Order dasti. APRIL 05,2010 ak wP(c) No.2180/2010 tb A(F, V/ S. MT]RALIDIIAR, J. Page 2 of 2