WP(C) 6169/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr B. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr HK Sarma, learned Standing Counsel for the Assam State Electricity Board(ASEB). The petitioner challenges the order dated 22.11.2011(Annexure IX) issued by the Chairman, ASEB, whereby, representation of the petitioner was rejected a nd his transfer from the post of GM, LTPS to the post of GM, Office of the CGM(D ), CAZ, was upheld by the Chairman, ASEB. In the first writ petition filed by the petitioner, this Court on 21.11. 2011(Annexure VII) passed an order directing consideration of the petitioner’s r epresentation against his transfer from L.T.P.S. A reading of the Chairman’s order shows that the experience of the petit ioner in the distribution sector was considered and he has been relocated from L akwa to Guwahati, in the better interest of the organization. As regards the contention made by the petitioner that his letter dated 2 0.10.2011(Annexure II) was the basis for shifting the petitioner from the projec t at Lakwa, a reading of the said letter suggests that it was a routine letter w here nothing adverse was written and in my view this letter couldn’t have trigge red the shifting of the petitioner to Guwahati. The petitioner was transferred i n exigencies of work and nothing more can be read in the order. In view of above, I see no merit in the case and the same is accordingly dismissed.