IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 13702 of 2008 Between: K. Anantha Reddy S/o. K. Sai Reddy R/o. Kanchamoniguda Village, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Tahsildar, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not surveying and demarcating the petitioner's land of an extent of Ac.1-38 Gts comprised Sy.No.219/ru , situated at Kanakamamidi Village, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, for fixing the boundry stones, even after receipt of the prescribed fee 750/- on 30.04.2008 from the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary, null and void and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to survey and fix the boundary stones in the land admeasuring Ac.1-38 Gts comprised Sy.No.219/ru , situated at Kanakamamidi Village, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, A.P. Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.S.V.INDIRA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed stating that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Ac.1.38 guntas situated in Sy.No.219/ru situated at Kanakamamidi Village, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and he entered into an agreement of sale in respect of the said land on 24.4.2008. It is also stated that he made an application to the 2nd respondent on 30.4.2008 by paying the prescribed fee requesting him to demarcate the land and to fix the boundary stones but so far, no action has been initiated. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue and at their request the matter is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage. Since the petitioner has already made an application by paying the prescribed fee, without going into the merits of the matter, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the application of the petitioner for survey and demarcation of the subject matter of the land and pass necessary orders on the said application as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.30.6.2008 msv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Tahsildar, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 3 2CCs to Govt.Pleader for Revenue, High Court of A.P. Hyd (OUT) 4 2CD copies