IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 21771 of 2010 Date of Decision: 7.12.2010. Smt. Sunita Devi --Petitioner Versus H.U.D.A. and another --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. A.S. Tewatia, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate present in the Court has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. Petitioner applied for 10 marla plot in Sector 57, Gurgaon in response to the advertisement issued by the respondents. He was allotted Plot No. 1502 in Sector 57, Gurgaon vide memo dated 2.2.2005 in draw of lots. Petitioner besides paying 10% of the earnest money also paid 15% of the tentative price of the plot. The short grievance of the petitioner is that he has not been given the possession of the plot. Petitioner made representation (Annexure P-7) which is still pending. Petitioner also sought information under R.T.I Act and it has been revealed vide letter dated 22.11.2010 that 36 plots of 10 marlas are still lying vacant in Sector 57, Gurgaon. CWP. No. 21771 of 2010 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the representation made by the petitioner in the light of the information disclosed vide letter dated 22.11.2010. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.3 to take decision on the representation made by the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 7.12.2010. lucky