f- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDJCATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. S NO. ‘i 2008 . - / i PETITIONERS : 1) Prakash Wakde S/o Late Shri R.P.Wakde, Aged about 49 years, Assistant Grade II, Office of Commissioner Land Records Chhattisgarh Rajpur 2) Narayan Singh Dhruv S/o Late Ratan Singh Dhruv, Aged about 43 years, Office of Commissioner Land Records Chhattisgarh Raipur Kamal Kanti Dattg S/o Late Shri V.C.Datta, Aged about 47 years, O£fice of Commissioner Land Records Chhattisgarh Raipur / 4) Smt Shashi Markam PJ/o/Shri Gariba Ram Thakur, Aged about 32 years, Assistant Grade HI, Office of Commissioner Land Records Chhattisgarh Raipur 5) / smt Shanti Baged W/o Late Shri Ramdas Baged, Aged about 55 years Assistant Grade II, Office of Commissioner Land Records Chhattisgarh Rajpur VERSUS / 1) State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretaly RESPONDENTS Revenue and Calamity Management Department Mantralaya D. K. S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) / 2) t The Commissioner Land Records Chhattisgarh Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE’ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITIS) OR ORDER(S} OR DIRECTIONSIS) R H§$H COURT G? CHHA Ti8f3ARH : BELA$§3§JR ‘sfgRW PEETQON §8) NO. 7’223 C}? 2&38 PE‘H' 'IONERS Prakash Wakde & Othefs Versus RESPON GENTS State of ghhattisgarh & Ancather ‘ {Wfit Pe‘dtieh wider Artécie 225 6f the Ceasiitution o? indie} Sinq!e Bench : Hcfa’bie Shi'i Saiish K. Aanéhotfé. J. Present :— SM Y.C. $harma, Advacaie fer “the getétimeys. Shri AVS¥it§haL Panei Lawyer f6; tha Staté. omagamg (Passed an tms 23‘3“: em 9f Mach: 2mm x” h} At the very outset ieamed‘ wunse! appeaf‘mg mi the petétmnem submiis iha‘i in v§$w 9f naz‘a a4 cf me {e‘ium daied 3—2-2i’3w mgd by the Staiefrespoadem$ mihmg wwivas m ms pemicn §0¥ admdécaiien. Howevea ieamed comsei ways thai ihe fe$p0ndem € authwiiies mav be di{ecéed tc cw3§§e¥ araa" desiée the repi'esen‘iatims of the aeimzaners at the eari§esi Having regarci t0 the facis $itua‘iian o§ the ca3e thai a mema wa$ $em 0n 3G—5-2886i'3i5-2w6 and the $ta’te has iaken a!m9s€ fem years iéme Lo cans-Me? am aass me Ower on ‘Ihe afcresaicg memoA “é"hus. ihe Sate auihogiiiea in ihe émemsi G‘fjusiiae‘ aa'e direciea’ ib take apprapyiate G’ecisizm m3 ”me aferesmieai memo, in ascsrtiance Mm :aw ana‘ on §ts awn mems. as expeciiiiawiy as passibia m’e‘fefaiaiy Wit in a ger‘md a? six wsekS fmm $3 {jam of a’ecemt cf a sew ofthis order. 3. Wivih :iwe afaresaw ebservations ana‘ diréc‘tioas the wa'ié ae%§"iion i5 ‘ Q Sd/- ’ Satish K. Agnihotri§ Judge d§smsec§ GT”.