gst 1 wp8988.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO. 8988 OF 2010. Subhash Dnyandeo Kadam & Ors. .. ... ... Petitioners. V/s Laxman Hariba More .. ... ... Respondent. Mr.R.V.Bansode, Adv. For the petitioners. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. 8th February, 2011. PC: By way of present petition the petitioner challenges the order dated 19.7.2010 vide which application filed by the respondent/plaintiff for amendment of the plaint came to be allowed. 2. Shri Bansode learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the property which is now sought to be included is the suit property which is allotted by the Government under the Indira House scheme and not an ancestral property and therefore such amendment could not have been allowed. 3. Learned trial Court has found that though issues were framed trial was yet to commence. It has also been held by the learned trial Court that at the stage of considering the application for amendment merits of the amendment are not to be considered. No perversity could be found in the approach adopted by the learned trial Court. Hence writ petition is dismissed.