IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 16942 of 2010 Date of decision : 07.01.2011 Dr. Maman Chand Sharma ...Petitioner versus The State Information Commission, Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Naveen S. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Narender Singh, D.A.G., Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr. H.N. Mehtani, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2, has stated that as the result of HCS (Executive), with regard to which the information was sought, has already been declared, therefore, the present writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Faced with the situation, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioner to file a fresh application for obtaining any other information in this respect, in accordance with law. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge January 07, 2011 naresh.k