IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.14592 of 2011 Date of Decision.10.08.2011 M/s Daljit Singh & Bros. Govt. Contractors 22, Golden Avenue, Amritsar through its partner Sh. Racchpal Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through its Secretary, PWD (B&R), Punjab, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Balbir Singh Jawal, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-3), which has been issued on behalf of the petitioner claiming the amount for the works done, is considered by the addressee and appropriate decision is taken regarding the payment. The respondent No.1 shall consider the demand made through the representation under Annexure P-3 within a period of two months and if the liability is admitted, the amount shall be forthwith released preferably within a period of one month from that date. 2. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 10, 2011 Pankaj*