IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 58 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 12 OF 2009 SHRI. RAJENDRA N. PARSEKAR THROUGH BEST FRIEND ALTAF KHAN ... Applicant Versus STATE THROUGH P. P. AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Rohit Bras De Sa,Advocate for the applicant. Coram:- C. L. PANGARKAR, J. Date:- 11th February, 2009 P.C. The present applicant/ accused had preferred an appeal against his conviction before the Sessions Judge. Along with the appeal, he had filed an application for condonation of delay in preferring the appeal. It seems that due to the absence of the applicant/ accused before the Sessions Judge, the Sessions Judge dismissed the application for condonation of delay. The dismissal of such condonation of delay application in fact, means the dismissal of the appeal and confirmation of the sentence. In view of this, since the revision is now admitted by the Court, the sentence imposed on the accused/ applicant, stands suspended on the accused / applicant's depositing in the Court a sum of Rs.38,000/- as directed by the Judicial Magistrate and on his furnishing a surety in the sum of Rs.10,000/- before the Sessions Judge. The accused be released only on his depositing a sum of Rs.38,000/- and on his furnishing security. An authenticated copy of this order,be supplied to the parties. C. L. PANGARKAR, J. SMA