IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2011 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 15754 of 2011(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- THARA SAVIO, D/O.SAVIO.M.THELLY, AGED 22 YEARS, RESIDING AT THELLIYIL HOUSE, ERATTUPETTA P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, COCHIN UNIVERSITY P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN 682022. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, COCHIN UNIVERSITY P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN 682022. BY SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI, SC FOR CUSAT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N. RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.15754 of 2011 ------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner underwent the B.Tech degree course in Computer Science and Engineering as a regular student of the Toc-H Institute of Science and Technology, Arakunnam, a college affiliated to the Mahatma Gandhi University. She appeared for the 7th Semester B.Tech degree examination conducted by the Cochin University of Science and Technology in November, 2010, the results of which were published on 10.5.2011. She failed in the paper Web Commerce Technologies. She has therefore applied for revaluation of her answer script in the said paper by submitting the original of Ext.P1 application dated 12.5.2011. The petitioner states that she had done well in the examination and that if her answer script is revalued, she is sure to secure a pass in the said paper. She submits that in these circumstances unless her answer script in the said paper is revalued and the results communicated to her expeditiously, she will be put to serious prejudice. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to conduct the revaluation of her answer script and to communicate the result to her expeditiously. 2. Sri.S.P.Aravindakshan Pillai, the learned standing counsel appearing for the Cochin University of Science and W.P.(C) No.15754/2011 2 Technology submitted that if Ext.P1 application is in order and the requisite fee has been remitted, the University will take steps to have the petitioner's answer script revalued and to communicate the result to her within six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. In the light of the said submission, I dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to take steps to have the petitioner's answer script described in Ext.P1 application revalued and to communicate the result to her within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, if the application for revaluation is in order and the requisite fee has been paid. P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. nj.