IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39604 of 2008 BIPIN KUMAR RAI S/O SRI BRAJ BHUSHAN RAI ----PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI VINRENDRA @ BIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH ---OPP.PARTIES. ----------- 03. 20.07.2010 A supplementary affidavit has been filed which is taken on record. Heard both sides. Petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 13.08.2008 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sitamadhi in complaint case no. 1452 of 2006. By this order cognizance has been taken under Sections 447 and 352 of the Penal Code. Petitioner, during the relevant time, was in dual charge of B.D.O. cum-C.O. of two circles namely, Majorganj and Suppi. Complainant is a lawyer. Learned counsel for the petitioner states, on instruction, that both the parties are sincerely involved in discussions and an application seeking compromise/compounding offence is likely to be filed within short time. It is further submitted that the aforesaid complainant had filed one another complaint case in which compromise was arrived at between the parties. Learned counsel representing the complainant, on instruction, does not dispute the aforesaid statement. Having regard to the aforesaid stand taken by the parties, this application is disposed of with the following 2 observation:- As and when an application seeking compromise/compounding offence is filed by the parties, learned Court below shall dispose of the same expeditiously in accordance with law. The application is disposed of. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)