H§GH CfjURT QF CHHATTQSGARH : BILASPUR WRW PET§T5ON {S} N€3J~$1 OF 2Q§§ Bhupesh Kigma Sinha & Ano€her Versus RESPGNDENTS The State of Madhya Pradesh & Others Single Bench : HoWbie Shré Satish K Amiheh; Preseni :- None r0! fhe péfifienars Sh“ PK B‘Iadur P for i‘iu Staie GRSER gORA' é {Passed 9a“ Ms 215 dav of Camber, 2009) The matter is caHed for hearing twice Or: both eccasior's horse appears not is anv represemqtlon made an behalf cf the pemionem The peWmers mav not 9e 3meres‘eu m the waiter 2) in View cf vie above the writ petition is dismissed for wrt o¥ arasecufio-a Regstrv is direcied to send a com! 9f thra to amer to the Detmoners far*hw;th " “~94 Sd,_ P VGcwn . Sansh K Agmhotrlv Judge