IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY MONDAY, THE 14TH MARCH 2011 / 23RD PHALGUNA 1932 WA.No. 2145 of 2008() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.3621/2002 .................... APPELLANT(S): -------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDHUDHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, K.S.E.BOARD, ELECTRICAL SECTION, VELLIKULANGARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS 1 TO 3 AND 4TH RESPONDENT:- ------------------------------------------------------ 1. GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOME BSNL, TRICHUR. 2. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAER PLANNING II, TELECOM BSNL, O/O THE GENERAL MANAGER, TRICHUR. 3. SUB DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, TELECOM (BSNL), KODAKARA. 4. K.M. JOSEPH, S/O. MATHAI, KULATHIAL HOUSE, P.O. VELLIKULANGARA, TRICHUR DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.K.KESAVANKUTTY, SC, BSNL FOR R1-3 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & B.P.RAY, JJ. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.A. No. 2145 of 2008 ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 14th day of March, 2011 J U D G M E N T Ramachandran Nair, J. Appeal is filed against grant of refund of around `48,000/- to the respondent, which is a Central Government undertaking. We do not think KSEB should pursue the appeal against the judgment after granting refund to the respondent, which is again a Government undertaking. Writ Appeal is, therefore, dismissed without going into the merits of the claim. Sd/- (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) Sd/- (B.P.RAY, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge