IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.528 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Mohit S/o Mahak Singh R/o Rahmet Pur, P.S. Bhopa, District Muzaffarnagar ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: May 21, 2010 Arising out of Case Crime No.479 of 2009 Under Section 302/120B IPC, P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. B.S. Adhikari, Advocate for the applicant as well as Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. Government Advocate for the State and also perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is not named in the FIR. He further argued that the case rests upon the circumstantial evidence and the chain of circumstances is not complete against the applicant to connect him with the alleged crime. Further, the main accused in this case are Praveen Balmiki, Nafees and Manga Tyagi, who have been assigned the role of committing murder of Naveen Jindal and the specific allegation has also been made against those accused persons. He further argued that the co-accused Sachin has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 26.4.2010 and the present applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Mohit be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of CJM, Haridwar. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 21.05.2010 RG