THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23445 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner was appointed as Field Assistant for Lingarajupalem Village, S.Rayavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District in the year 2008 under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme. Through proceedings, dated 27.07.2011, the Project Director, respondent No.1 herein, placed the petitioner under suspension. The petitioner challenges the same. She contends that respondent No.1 passed the order absolutely without any basis and the impugned order suffers for non-application of mind. It is urged that on the one hand, it is mentioned in the order that there are no charges and on the other, the suspension was ordered. The respondents produced the record. It is stated that the expression “no charges” had occurred in the proceedings on account of the stipulation of a standard proforma. It is stated that the order was supplemented through separate reasons. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. The impugned order appears to have been passed by taking the help of a standard proforma. A clause pertaining to the charges depicts as though there are no charges against the petitioner and further, the procedure adopted by the respondents is totally untenable. After realizing their mistake, respondent No.1 has issued proceedings, dated 02.09.2011, withdrawing the order of suspension and reinstating the petitioner into service. With this, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of taking on record the proceedings, dated 02.09.2011. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:05.09.2011 kdl