IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 10920 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 16th February, 2011. Darshan Singh Petitioner through Mr. N.D.Achint, Advocate Versus The District & Sessions Judge, Gurgaon & Anr. Respondents through Mr. R.S.Kundu, Addl.AG, Haryana. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner seeks quashing of the impugned order dated 24.05.2010 [Annexure P-6] passed by learned District & Sessions Judge, Gurgaon allegedly against the statutory provisions of the Haryana Civil Services [Punishment and Appeal] Rules, 1987. Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto, reply/affidavit has been filed. I have heard learned counsel for the parties at some length. Having regard to the conclusions drawn by learned District & Sessions Judge in Para No. 5 of his order dated 27.04.2010 wherein he agreed with the Inquiry Officer in respect of the charges at Sr. No. [i] to [vii] but disagreed with the Inquiry Officer qua Charge No. [viii], I find that the subsequent order dated 24./05.2010 [Para 21] is inconsistent as in this paragraph, learned District & Sessions Judge, Gurgaon has disagreed with the entire inquiry report. Consequently, the subsequent order dated 24.05.2010 passed by learned District & Sessions Judge, Gurgaon is modified to the extent that the supplementary inquiry shall pertain to Charge No. [viii] only and shall be conducted by Shri Y.S.Rathor, learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Gurgaon, if so required, on day to day basis. He shall submit his report to the District & Sessions Judge, Gurgaon on or before 31.08.2011 and in case the petitioner does not cooperate, the Inquiry Officer shall be at liberty to proceed against him in accordance with law. Disposed of. Dasti. February 16, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE