1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3883 OF 2010 * Late Gayabai w/o Panditrao Jagdale, (since deceased through L.Rs.) 1. Suryabhan s/o Panditrao Jagdale, Age 55 years, Occ.Agriculture, 2. Chandrabhan s/o Panditrao Jagdale, Age 50 years, Occ.Agriculture, 3. Sukhdeo s/o Panditrao Jagdale, Age 40 years, Occ.Agriculture, 4. Namdeo s/o Panditrao Jagdale, Age 35 years, Occ.Agriculture, 5. Sakharam s/o Panditrao Jagdale, Age 30 years, Occ.Agriculture, 6. Narayan s/o Panditrao Jagdale, Age 28 years, Occ.Agriculture, All R/o Gandheli, Tal. & Dist. Aurangabad ..PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra, (Through the Secretary, Industries, Energy and Labour Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400032) 2. Inspector General of Registration And Collector of Stamps, M.S. Pune, Ground Floor, Opposite to Vidhan Bhavan (Council Hall), New Administration Building, Pune - 411 001 2 3. Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Aurangabad Division, Central Administrative Building, IInd Floor (South East cabin), Collector Office Compound, Aurangabad 4. Regional Officer, Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Aurangabad ..RESPONDENTS Mr M.S. Karad, Advocate for the petitioners; Mr K.J. Ghute Patil, A. G.P. for respondents no.1 to 3; Mr S.B. Bhosale, Advocate for respondent no.4. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ DATE : 28th April, 2010 ORAL JUDGMENT [ PER GANGAPURWALA , J ] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties the petition is taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission. 2. By the present petition the petitioners challenge the impugned letter dated 14.11.2007 and the letter 18.12.2007 wherein it was directed that the sale deed presented by the petitioners cannot be registered. 3 3. It transpires that the circular by virtue of which the sale deed was not being registered came to be withdrawn by the respondents pursuant to circular dated 4.2.2010. In view of the fact that the said circular has been withdrawn, there is no impediment for the authorities to register the instrument of conveyance. We direct the respondents to effectuate registration of instrument of conveyance, if presented by the petitioners and if otherwise it complies with all other legal requirements. 4. Rule is thus made absolute on the above terms with no order as to costs. ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) ( P.V.HARDAS ) JUDGE JUDGE amj/wp3883.10