IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8838 of 2010 1. KHEDU PASWAN 2. SIKANDAR SAHANI 3. HARUN HAZAM . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 12.03.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse sections including Sections 307/353 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that altogether 26 accused persons are named besides 150 unknown persons. Allegation is general and omnibus that obstruction was provided to the police personnel in discharge of their duties followed by assault. Learned counsel handed in an order dated 24.12.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40083 of 2009 whereby similarly placed co-accused have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail noticing the submissions of the petitioners. The said order is placed on record marked “X”. It is contended that the case of the petitioners stand on identical footing. Learned A.P.P. does not dispute the aforesaid submission. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Raxaul, District- East Champaran in connection with 2 Adapur (Harpur) P.S. case no. 1 of 2007 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )