1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3898 OF 2011 (Rajkumar s/o Sampatraoji Kuthe vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri R.L. Khapre, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.D. Sonak, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent nos. 1 to 4. Shri A.A. Madiwale, Advocate for the respondent no.5. Shri Samarth, Advocate for the respondent no.7. --------- CORAM : R.M. SAVANT, J. DATED : AUGUST 11, 2011 The above petition takes exception to the order dated 2/8/2011 passed by the Collector, Gondia whereby the objection filed by the petitioner in respect of nomination of the respondent no.5 as a representative of the respondent no.6 Society for participating in the elections of the Gondia District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. came to be rejected. The reasons why the objection has been rejected are mentioned in the impugned order. 2 In my view, the said reasons are unexceptional in the context of the summary enquiry that the Collector is required to carry out in terms of the Rules in question. In that view of the matter, no case for interdiction is made out. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. However, it would be open for the petitioner to adopt such proceedings as are permissible in law after the elections are over, if occasion arises. JUDGE khj