IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST JANUARY 2007 / 11TH MAGHA 1928 WP(C).No. 35298 of 2005(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. DR. V.GOVINDARU, SCIENTIST-C, GEO INFORMATICS, INFORMATION KERALA MISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. B.N. SHIRAZ, ASSISTANT MANAGER, INFORMATION KERALA MISSION, PRATHEEKSHA TOWERS, SREEKARIAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. V.S. SAJEEV KUMAR, RESEARCH ASSISTANT, INFORMATION KERALA MISSION, PRATHEEKSHA TOWERS, SREEKARIAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. SRI.S.RAMESH SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH SRI.NAVEEN.T SRI.T.G.SUNIL (PRANAVAM) POOJA SURENDRAN SRI.C.X.ANTONY BENEDICT RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR, CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF IMAGING TECHNOLOGY (C-DIT), CHITRANJALI STUDIO COMPLEX, THIRUVALLOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-27. 3. THE EXECUTIVE MISSION DIRECTOR, INFORMATION KERALA MISSION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-33. R1 BY G.P. SHRI P.A. SALIM R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.KOSHY GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX EXT.P1-TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 24.3.2000 ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR ALONG WITH THE APPENDIX EXT.P2-TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 8.7.2003 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENTS EXT.P3-TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION DATED 4.4.2005 ISSUE DBY THE GOVERNMENT EXT.P4-TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION DATED 11.4.2005 ISSUED BY THIRD RESPONDENTS EXT.P5-TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 7.4.2005 ISSUED BY THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR IKM. EXT.P6-TRUE COPY OF NOTE TO THE THIRD RESPONDENT DATED 26.4.2005 ISSUED BY R2 EXT.P7-TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 23.3.2004 ISSUED BY THE C-DIT. // TRUE COPY // T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) NO.35298 OF 2005-B - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATED THIS THE 31ST JANUARY, 2007. JUDGMENT In the above writ petition, by an interim order dated 25.5.2006 the second respondent was directed to reinstate the petitioners in service. In compliance with the interim order, the petitioners have already been reinstated in service in the parent department. Learned counsel for the petitioners therefore submit that no further orders are required in this writ petition. The writ petition is therefore closed. (T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) JUDGE. kav/