IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 31ST JANUARY 2011 / 11TH MAGHA 1932 RP.No. 51 of 2011(V) ------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.1380/2010 Dated 01/02/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS / RESPONDENTS IN THE WPC: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. JOINT DIRECTOR OF SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, COLLECTORATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF RE-SURVEY, NEYYATTINKARA. 4. VILLAGE OFFICER, THIRUPURAM, NEYYATTINKARA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. NISHA BOSE RESPONDENT / PETITIONER IN WP(C) : -------------------------------------------------------- P.S.NARAYANAN, S/O.LATE PADMANABHAN, AGED 82 YEARS, EDAVILAKATHU HOUSE, ARUMANNOOR, THIRUPURAM, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 121. BY ADV. SMT.I.SHEELA DEVI THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- Review Petition No.51 OF 2011 in W.P.(C)No.1380 Of 2010 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 31st DAY OF JANUARY, 2011 O R D E R Heard the learned Government Pleader and the learned counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioner. 2. The Writ Petition was disposed of by Annexure A1 judgment directing the 3rd respondent to conduct due enquiry and take appropriate action within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. It is averred in the memorandum of Review Petition that the Government as per Annexures A2 and A3 have transferred the authority in respect of certain matters with the Additional Tahsildar concerned and therefore he is the competent authority to take action in the matter. Accordingly, the files have been transferred to the Additional Tahsildar, Neyyattinkara to take appropriate action in the matter. 3. In the light of the above, the operative portion of the judgment will have to be modified. Therefore, the Review Petition is allowed as prayed for. The judgment in W.P.(C)No.1380/2010 is recalled. Sd/-( T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn True copy P.A. to Judge