IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.39218 of 2008 KHAGAN YADAV, SON OF LATE BIRANCHI YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – NEW TOLIA BHIMRI, P.S. – PASRAHA, DISTRICT – KHAGARIA ....................PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR .................................... OPP. PARTY ----------- 2 24.03.2009 In the instant application the petitioner prays for transfer of Sessions Trial Case No. 326 of 2004 arising out of Pasraha P.S. Case No. 95 of 2004 under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code to any other Sessions Division. The petitioner is the informant of the case. He has sought for transfer of the case from the present court to any other competent court. Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is rumour that the other side approached the court, where the case is presently pending. The petitioner apprehends that he would not get justice from the court. Learned counsel for the accused submits that they want speedy disposal of his case. He submits that accused has no objection, if case is transferred to any other competent court. He submits that the case is at the stage of argument. The grievance of the petitioner was also considered by the learned Sessions Judge and finding no merit in the submission of petitioner, rejected his petition, having no concrete basis. In the above circumstances, this Court finds that apprehension of petitioner is misconceived and the petition is accordingly rejected. Let the order be communicated through fax to the court concerned at the cost of either of the parties. Kundan (S. P. Singh, J.)