IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24228 of 2010 SANTOSH RAJBANSHI son of Ram Sukhi Rajbanshi, resident of village Mahurai Pachhiyari Tola, Police Station Haspura, District Aurangabad(Bihar) … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…. Opposite Party For the Petitioner: Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, Advocate For the State: None ----------- 3 25.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. However, no one appears on behalf of the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner’s prayer for bail was earlier rejected by this Court on 12.11.2009 in Cr. Misc. No. 38763 of 2009. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons and other family members have already been enlarged on bail. However, the petitioner, who happens to be the husband of the deceased, has remained in custody. However, on consideration of the facts of the case, this Court had already rejected the prayer of the 2 petitioner on 12.11.2009 in Cr. Misc. No. 38763 of 2009 and the petitioner could not point out any fresh ground for grant of bail. In the above view of the matter, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. However, I have perused the report of the trial court kept at Flag “X”. The trial court is directed to take all possible steps for expeditious disposal of the trial preferably within six months. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)