1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. 3rd Bail Application No. 6505/2009 Vishwajeet Singh & Anr. vs. State of Rajasthan Dated : 01.09.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. Manphool Ram with Mr. Pawan Sharma, for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor. This order governs the disposal of third bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. by Mr. Manphool Ram and Mr. Pawan Sharma Advocate on behalf of the applicants pertaining to FIR No. 119/2007 of police station Sawar, District Ajmer in the offence under Section 19/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as also the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and perused the relevant material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners have canvassed that seven witnesses have been examined by the prosecution but nothing has emerged against the petitioners in their statements. He took me through the statements of PW-7 Rajesh Verma, Investigating Officer of this case and contended that he also did not depose that the alleged recovery of liquor was made from the possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have been in custody for quite a long time, hence, they may be granted indulgence of bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application on those very grounds enumerated in the first bail petition adjudicated on 19.06.2009. 5. Having considered the submissions made at the bar and scanned the relevant material on 2 record, I, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, do not find any good ground to change my earlier view and the third bail petition also deserves to be dismissed. 6. In the result, the third bail petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the accused-petitioners stands dismissed. 7. However, keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned trial court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial within a period of two months, as the petitioners have been in custody for quite a long time. (MAHESH BHAGWATI)J. Mak/- 16