HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 1286 OF 2009 Dated: 09-11-2009 Between: The Commissioner of Employment & Training, Government of Andhra Pradesh, BRKR Buildings, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad and two others ... APPELLANTS AND Laural Industrial Training Center, Hanamkonda, rep., by its Principal K. Manikyam S/o Prabhuswamy, r/o. H.No. 4-6-30, Kumarpally, Hanamkonda, Warangal District and five others ... RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 1286 OF 2009 JUDGEMENT: (per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) Being aggrieved by a common order dated 29-06-2009 passed in Writ Petition No. 17766 of 2007, this appeal has been filed by the original respondents – official respondents. 2. The facts giving rise to the present appeal in the aforestated writ petition, in a nutshell, are as under: The respondents – original petitioners are institutions running courses for industrial training. There was an allegation that the amount of scholarship which was given to the students of the respondents – original petitioners had been misappropriated by the respondents and in the circumstances, a show cause notice dated 09-06-2007 was issued and thereafter by an order dated 27-10-2008, their recognition had been cancelled. Being aggrieved by the said order, the aforestated writ petition had been filed alleging that the said order was not a speaking order. After hearing the concerned advocates, the learned single Judge came to the conclusion that the order passed by the authority was not a speaking order as no reason of whatsoever type was assigned in the order, whereby the recognition had been cancelled. The learned single Judge, therefore, allowed the writ petition with costs. 3. The learned Government Pleader for Labour has submitted that a criminal case has already been filed against the respondents and there is a prima facie case against them and, therefore, the order whereby the recognition was cancelled is just and proper. 4. Be that as it may, the fact remains that the order whereby recognition has been cancelled does not give any reason and, therefore, in our opinion, the learned single Judge has rightly allowed the petition by setting aside the said order. 5. Looking to the facts of the case, we direct that no amount of scholarship for students or any financial aid of whatsoever type shall be released in favour of the respondent – institutions till the institutions are heard afresh and appropriate order, as directed by the learned single Judge, is passed by the appellant – authorities. We also quash the order with regard to awarding costs. 6. In view of the above order, the appeal stands disposed of as party allowed with no order as to costs. 7. As a sequel to the above, WAMP No. 2687 of 2009, filed by the appellants for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 09-11-2009 ks