N N THE HIGH COURT F A F CHHATTISGARH T BILASPU m H" m BENE "§( gfi [2010 wP.s.)-N0.- , ur 17 S l o mt.,Jyot1 Baa‘ ewangan W h ’ 'Hemkant Dew ' gan ,Aged‘ ear Asswta; e e nma coo ' gh Dg ( G.) .V 'ETITION PER‘: ‘ S f 1 abu Teachr Govrnment Pry v Shl Block osamnar Ra1ar 1str1ct‘Ra1arh C ’ ‘ S VERSU St f Chhtgrh tae o at1sa hrou e Secretar ucatmn Deartmen awan RaJpur ) ’ a1ar 1sr1ct aJgar 3)“ Th Bk er e lco Educat10n Offic RESS PONDENT N D 226 ONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT I ATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR AN THER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC ‘ M W @ I O JUDICTURE O " “ A R 46, ‘ ys, nt ot Ka Tgh Th y School Ed pt ' ,D K S Bh, (C G ‘ / The D1str1ct Educa on Offlcer“ Rgh Dt Rh (C G ) (CG) WRIT PETITIO UNER ARTICLE OF THE C N N Y O XI HC—78 WWWW ‘ w (CQmQIqYuw mm m zoo mm<w§w> mwfaaia: WWW mmm mm w®w $simm SB : Hon’ble shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 05-08-2010 Shri D. R. Patel, counsel for th a petitioner. L e Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel ‘ r for the State/respondents on advance copy. Heard. Learned counsel appearing or the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitied to benefit of tw advance increments on account of she having passed B. Ed. examinatio before her appointment at her own cost. It is submitted that the issue i volved in the present petition is no longer res integra and the same has been finally decided by the Hcn’ble Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena vs. State of MP. & 01's., 2009 (ill) MPJR (SC) 59. lt is furth submitted that this Court has also taken a similar view in‘ his or er dated 06-02-2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned c unsel for the petitioner further draws attention of this Court to order da 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal No.124 of 2009, wherein relying upo the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena (supra the order passed by this Court in another Writ Appeal No.87l2009, directions have been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21-09-1974 issued by he State of. Madhya Ptadesh, atter verification of the facts pleaded in the petition. Learned counsel for the res ondents Submits that case of the petitioner would also be considered o the same lines. t ) d mm unnuun‘ E1200