{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4394 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.349 OF 2009 Latif Khan Quaram Khan APPLICANT VERSUS Nasiroddin s/o Ajamoddin Shaikh & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.Abdul Aziz, Advocate for applicant Mrs.Yogita M.Kshirsagar, APP for respondent No.3 State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 15th January 2010 PER COURT: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. At present issue notice to respondent No.3, State. Learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the state. 2. By the present application, the applicant, original respondent, has prayed for condonation of delay of 57 days caused in preferring criminal revision application challenging the order of acquittal rendered in Sessions Case No.08/2008. {2} 3. It is contended that the delay is not intentional or deliberate, but it has caused due to bonafide belief that the State would prefer appeal against the order of acquittal. Considering the submissions, it is not necessary to issue notice to respondents No. 1 and 2. As the delay is not intentional or deliberate, the same needs to be condoned. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause I and II of the application. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln4394-09 {3} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.349 OF 2009 Latif Khan Quaram Khan APPLICANT VERSUS Nasiroddin s/o Ajamoddin Shaikh & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.Abdul Aziz, Advocate for applicant Mrs.Yogita M.Kshirsagar, APP for respondent No.3 State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 15th January 2010 PER COURT: 1. It is informed that the State has filed an appeal challenging the order of acquittal rendered in Sessions Case No. 08/2008 and the same is numbered as Criminal Appeal No. 600/2009. In the premise, this revision is to be tagged with the Criminal Appeal No.600/2009, which is admitted on 20.11.2009. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln4394-09