s .: i gmmEggw$maat 4m;mwmmgx girzamgaumgmgrgwm) * i§~§wum§$iwwaé «2 a ’19 :a‘ § w7'w; W2 7 ‘ileiign sw’ Hrap/Rsrtnerr 51:1 ‘n ’Yvis ’sen &f (mat Emwn) , aconut merchant, Sri Jégannath Trust building, Gudlyari. Raipur (C.G) § H~m3f¥1wét¢§as:- 041 /2(a) Smt.Ham1da Bano,widow cf Suleman. irfan“ son of late Suleman. , intiazr,sen ‘o£ late Sul eman. a *‘Akara‘m’,s’c’n of “late Sulemam Smt. Asma Bane, aged about 25 years, wife of Mahdmmiz, resident of‘ Hasaiakapada Manzil,station mad, :Dhauraj‘i Glj‘aleat). wggu£ar3aumage¢ MaMiHamza; abggt tomman 23w3ars, Sammy. 1% »g i §surat ”(@jarét). ’ h/Q‘ y ‘h§é“fd°3& fga'wi iagediab0ut§33yyaars, Imdul‘ka éGa a Sidqnit of 4 Va Bai, . i rs , oi anmai manaz‘,2i:aq q¢gabqgt gag wea ngwuua gea$fan ugsmdent it ai , ) t Versus g Sri Jagannah Mandi rust reitered de th . c Trust c through 5n Dec Klshan Tapadlya, aged about 70 t r T gs uar e M P.Pub11 At years, son of late Mulrag Tapadiya, resident of Gudiyari, Tah‘ & Dt Raipur(CG) Dec Kishan Tapadiya, aged about 70 years, / eon of late Mulraj Tapadiya,resident cf Gudiyari, Tah. & Dt. Raipur (C. G) is ‘Y 1 a u § I ‘ c g ¥ r " ( ‘ “We £ x e w 4 wm (magazt ghM § ‘ ‘, , (5. ) é E. ‘ r442 *Véxshakmagaw iBhl wanting (ma ‘ t- , bout g irAg‘rgéaiwaiJw :«aged about ’i fn éqf I. iléa‘lg‘irnath‘ lAglra’wa; ,‘ am ag‘ er mwig gen-wt: Raipu r. H/m' éma‘mialaiwaoenkra, aged about 48 years, ‘f/ J son af'haxm’inaraya‘n Goenka,resident M’. of Gudiyar-i, Raipur. ” /8-. Jagdish praSad Lahoti, aged abeut 42 } I; years,‘ son of Ratanlal Laho‘ti, : i resident of 'Gudiyari, Raipur. Radheshyam Agrawal, aged about 45 i years, son 9f Satyanarayan Agrwal, resident of Gudiyari, Raipm'. Jagdish Prasad 'Pogaliya, aged about 65 years, son of Banshidhar Pogaliga, resident of Gudiyari, Eaipur. a J sehanLal‘ iapaciiym aged abaut 52' Years’ “‘5 7 v sQn ;3£4:Mu;11$ajwTa9adi¥aire3vidmt °f ' :Gudi$ax£.,: éaaiiépru r. 5M2}: ‘Slé‘réw €Ag’rawa15; aged ‘éa’bonut £38. syears, a H awn go} (Jagdiah‘ mgraWaJu {resident of fiaged‘ ggabout 38 gyeers, Eawahq grea‘ixdent of DETAILS OF THE PETITION « Ié Q] ‘m e i I§g XI-HC-78 Hw,m,f§m mm ‘ .w£§$;9..ki1i% 21E 200 WW(W) maxim wmm m m w m 8.2.2007 Dr. Shaiiesh Ahuja, Advonate for the petitioners. Heard. This petition is directed a 8.1 1 .2006 whereby the applicat 13 Rule 2O of CPC has been r Ciass—H, Raipuiz The grievance of the petit 3 dated 8.2.2006 the court bek Shri Manoj Joshi as witness and directed him to come with the record. The above witness appeared in *he Court in pursuance of that summon, but without record. In these circumstances, the above apptication was fiied by the petitionerstdefendarts and'the same has been rejected by ition that the certified copy of document s is already present on record and. , 3 summon the original record. nsel for the petitioners and perused the WW§WW éamm ;ainst the order of Annexure P-2 dated on of the petitioners filed under Order ejected by the teamed 2nd Civii Judge, ioners is that vide order of Annexure F?-. )w had summoned Revenue Inspector the court below with an observe relied upon by the defendant therefore, there is no necessityt l have heard learned cou impugned order. The reason assigned t application suffers with no i'nfirr the petitioners because of abov to be dismissed and it is dismiss Consequently, M.W.P. Nc ed at the admission stage itself. ry. the court below- for rejecting the "lity and no prejudice is likely to cause e order. Therefore, the petition is liable 409/07 also stands dismissed. Sd/- Judge Dhirendl‘a MiShTa P.T.O.