IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32291 of 2009 SHASHI RANJAN @ HARINANDAN KUMAR @ HARINANDAN MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 11.09.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. Nobody appears on behalf of the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 420, 406, 409, 467, 468, 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that co-accused Raj Kumar Singh, opened Gramin Bank and certain amounts were received from different villagers. Subsequently, the amounts were not refunded. Learned counsel submits that the F.I.R. discloses specifically the complicity of aforesaid Raj Kumar Singh. So far as petitioner is concerned, he has been named, but in what manner he defaulted, the informant has not been disclosed therein. Referring to Annexures -2 and 3, it is contended that he is in Government service since September, 2005. Presently he is posted as Junior Engineer in Indian Railways, Madhupur. Referring to Annexure- 4, it is contended that the informant realized the mistake in naming him and therefore has approached the Court by filing an application. 2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from today, shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Dharhara P.S. Case No.59 of 2009, G.R. No. 940 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner shall also deposit with the Civil Court a sum of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand Only) which will remain deposited in the Civil Court until final decision of the case. It is made clear, no sooner the case is taken up for trial, the petitioner shall appear in person as and when called upon by the trial court. P.K. (K.K. Mandal, J.)