IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 9578 of 2008 Decided on: 29.12.2010 Hari Krishan …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner is seeking regularization to the post of Junior Draughtsman w.e.f. 1.4.1990. He had completed more than 10 years' continuous service in 2002 with 240 days in a block of 12 calender months, however, he has not been regularized. 2. Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner was required to be considered for regularization as per Para-1 of notification dated 8.7.1999. 3. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization from the due date with all consequential benefits, strictly as per Para-1 of Annexure R-1, dated 8.7.1999, within a period 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner, No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 29, 2010 (K. Attri)