1 S.B.Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.2637/2007 (Rajendra vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : July 09, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.R.K.Charan, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that co-accused Usha, Bheru Lal and Smt. Manju have been granted anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. From perusal of the order impugned, it appears that the allegation against the petitioner and his wife is that they are involved in women trafficking. On the relevant date of occurrence, the involvement of the petitioner is shown. Even after the investigation, the police has filed the challan under section 299 and the petitioner was declared absconder. In view of the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jagtar Singh vs. Satendra Kaur alias Bhavana Grover & Ors., 2002 2 Cr.L.R. (SC) 807, wherein the apex Court held that when the accused are absconding, there is no question of granting anticipatory or regular bail, the petitioner is not entitled for anticipatory bail. In this view of the matter, the bail application filed by the petitioner under section 438 Cr.P.C. stands dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-