HIGH COURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR WRIT PETtTION (S) No. 3426 of 2007 PETITIONERS •s 1. Shiv Prasad Sahu, Aged about 44 years, S/6. LateShri Ghasi Ram Sahu,Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Telavar, 2. Brijlal Hichami, Agedabout 43 years, S/o. Shri Shri Rai Singh Hichami, Assistant Teacher, Primary Schobl, BhatBpara More, 3. Smt, Anita Dehari, Aged about40 years, W/o. Shri Ramchandra Dehari,Assistant Teacher, Primary Sehool Kokpur, 4; Tularam Patel, Aged about41 years,S/o. Shri Gendlal Patel, Assistant Teacher, PrimarySchool;Pusavandt 5. Smt. Kamla Patel, aged about 44 years, W/o Tularam Patsl, Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Pusavand, All are at Block Kanker, Distt. Kanker VERSUS 1. State ofChhattisgarh Through Secretary, iScBoolF Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, <C.G^ 2. The Direetor, Public InstrucUon, Raipur 3. District Education Officer, Kanker District Kanker(C.G.) 4. Block Education OfRcer, Kanker (C.G.) 5, Treasury & Funds Department, Kanker WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA RESPONDENTS Single Bench Hon'ble Mr. JusticeSatishK.Agnihotri Present: Mr D.N.PrajapatEAdyocate^thepeWonere Mr. Arvind Dufsey, Panelilawyer forthe respondents/Stete. R -A'-;("?Kni»sgiit^K.;:.:-':: 3. ORDER (Passed on22"<lday pfJune, 2007) The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitionere are entitled tb regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of iniUal appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the respondent^State jointly submitthat the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition arethe same to that ofin W.P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwan and others vs. State Govemment of Chhattisgarh and others), which was allowed vide orderdated 7.11.2006. In view of the above-stated submissions made by leamed counsel appearing for the parties, the writ peU'tion is allowed in ttiesame terms. No order.as tocosts. .•Sd/-'....,. ' SatishK.^gmltotri .luag^ ^.