1 lpa130.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 130 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4234 OF 2011 WITH LETTERS PATANT APPEAL NO. 129 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4233 OF 2011 _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | orders or | Court's or Judge's Orders directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Shri N.D. Sonawane holding for Shri V.D. Hon, Advocate for appellant in LPA No. 130 of 2011. Shri V.M. Kagne, Advocate for the appellant in LPA no. 129 of 2011. Shri S.P. Brahme, Advocate for respondent no.2 in LPA no. 130/2011 and for respondent no.1 in LPA No. 129 of 2011. Shri S.S. Choudhary, Advocate for respondent no.4. ..... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. Date : 22nd July, 2011. . The Letters Patent Appeals are directed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in several Writ Petitions, which were heard together. By this order, the learned Single Judge has held that the order impugned in the Writ Petition, passed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner on 5th March, 2010, was legal 2 lpa130.10 and proper. The Court observed that the appellants, who are the members of the Managing Committee had continued in the office without any reason though their term had expired in 2008. It was also observed that the applications of the persons for being enrolled as members have been received after the cut off date and the Managing Committee was trying to enroll them as members in order to ensure that they voted in the elections, which were to be held on 7th March, 2010. The learned Judge has found that the Assistant Charity Commissioner has rightly directed that the elections would be held on the basis of the undisputed list of voters i.e. the list prepared on 16th October, 2005. Accordingly, the elections have been held. However, the results have not been declared. 2. On a perusal of the impugned order, we see no reason to interfere with the same, as the learned Judge has reached proper conclusions. Appeals dismissed. The interim order granted by this Court is vacated. 3. The learned Advocate appearing for the appellants seeks continuation of the order passed, directing that the status-quo should be maintained and the results of the 3 lpa130.10 elections should not be declared. Mr. Brahme, the learned Advocate appearing for respondent no.1 opposes this application, by contending that the results ought to be declared immediately as the appellants are continuing in the office even after the elections have been held for almost one and half years. 4. In our opinion, there is no need to grant any relief to the appellants. In case the appellants are aggrieved by the result of the elections held, they can always challenge the same in appropriate proceedings. 5. In view of the dismissal of the Letters Patent Appeals, all civil applications are dismissed. ( M. T. JOSHI, J. ) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J) ga s/lpa130.10