IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 24TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 27718 of 2010(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- KOMALAVALLY VIJAYAN, AGED 58, W/O.LATE VIJAYAN, USHAS, POOMALA, VELLIYAMATTOM VILLAGE, THOOVAKANDAM, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DIST. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB CHACKO SRI.B.V.JOY SANKER RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, IDUKKI - 685559. 2. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, MOOLAMATTOM, IDUKKI - 685559. BY G.P.SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH FOR R1 S.C.SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P(C)No.27718 of 2010 ---------------------------------------- Dated 15th September, 2010 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is regarding the erection of a Transformer in a most inconvenient manner inasmuch as it has been erected on the centre of the road boundary of her property. There is yet another contention that the stay wires were fixed in her property without her consent. In the said circumstances, she has submitted Ext.P2 representation to the second respondent. The petitioner has approached this Court on account of the inaction on the part of the second respondent in taking action based on Ext.P2 representation. I have heard the learned standing counsel appearing for the second respondent as well. The fact that the second respondent had already received Ext.P2 representation is admitted. When such a representation carrying an objection is received from the petitioner, the second respondent should have taken appropriate steps in accordance with law. The learned standing counsel for the second respondent submitted that though the Transformer has been erected, it is yet to be energised. In the said circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to refer the matter to the first WP(C).No.27718/2010 2 respondent and with a further direction not to energise the Transformer without obtaining further orders from the first respondent. C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS