CR No.1881 of 2009 - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.1881 of 2009 Date Of Decision: 23.09.2009 **** Naresh Kumar . . . . Petitioner VS. Phool Chand . . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Bhag Singh, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated March 3, 2009 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rewari permitting the respondent-plaintiff to lead evidence in rebuttal. The petitioner-defendant’s grievance is that the evidence permitted to be led, ought to have been brought by the respondent in affirmative. Counsel for the respondent-plaintiff, on the other hand, has pointed out Issue No.4 to the effect that “whether the suit is maintainable for mis-joinder and non-joinder for necessary parties?” - framed on account of the preliminary objection raised by the defendant. He submits that the evidence in rebuttal has been led by the plaintiff only against the issue No.4. In this view of the matter, the revision petition is disposed of with a clarification that the evidence led by the respondent in rebuttal shall be read against issue No.4 only. Dasti. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE CR No.1881 of 2009 - 2 – 23.09.2009 shonkar