^ iyi •^. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) Writ Petition (S) No._6\S<5_/2010 PETITIONER : Smt. Amba Humne, W/o Late l^i ^,m3la^ Sudesh Humne, aged 35 years, .^ Occupation:- Presently ^:^5^" ^o-- t^--"" Versus RESPONDENTS working as Peon at Dr. B.R. Ambedkar N.N. Girls Higher Secondary School, Bilaspur (C.G.), R/o Magarpara, Bilaspur (C.G.) t. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Urban Administration and bevelopment bepartment, Manatralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. y2. Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, Through its Gommissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Principal, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar N.N. Girls Higher Secondary School, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNbER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1950 /_ /" ;C—78 3TI^T^ Ri'licb WT ^T^T'^TRW NI*ICTI <i»Tn^» 's^ ^ww^, ^>^\w[S, |s«ni-M'j,< ^..M^..^^.^^^^d ^200 ^TI^?T TRiF (T^35^) ^PRTTW ^Ti?<? 3T^ff <^l^t<n<lil 'WI^ff "^f fe^ iFai^K ^3ffiR^lt?T SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICB PRITlNKER DZWAKER 26.10.2010 Shri Malay Shrivastava, coui^ ShriAjit Singh, P.L. for the S^ Grievance of the pefcitioner in| sel for the petitioner. .ate. the present petition is that she was appointed on compassionate grou^id on 9.1.06 and though she is performing her duties regularly ne|ther she has been paid her salary nor she ha.s been regularized. According to the counsel f<(>r the petitioner^ on the ba.sis of circular dated 5.3.2008 (Annexure ^ regularization. In the petition^ it has not .be(j she has filed representation before Court is of the considered view thatl the resp. No.2 by making a detail^ expecfced from the resp. No.2 to decijJe the same in accordance with law after considering all the facts in| ^/3) the petitioner is entitled for her |n pleaded that at any point of tirne I'espondeiit N0.2 and therefore this the petitioner has to first approach |d representation and in tum it is [^luding the circular of the State Government. The resp. No.2 would|be further obliged to examine as to why the petitioner has not been pai(| salary since April 2010. Accordingly, the petition is | petitioner to make a representation] two weeks form the date of receipt <j respondent N0.2 shall decide the re^resentation of the petitioner within further period of two months in an ci It is made clear that this Coi|irt has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authcjrity concerned would be at iiberty to decide the saine after due scrutinjy of fa.cts, in accordance with law. [lisposed of with a direction to the [before resp. No.2 within a period of ^f copy of this order and in tum the bjective manner. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker judge