20.wp.402-10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.402 OF 2010 State of Maharashtra and another. ..Petitioners. Versus Shri Vilas Dhondiba Bhoite. ..Respondent. .... Mr.S.N. Patil, AGP, for the Petitioners - State. Ms.Swati Manchekar, Advocate for the Respondent. .... CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 28, 2010. P.C. 1. The order of the MAT which is challenged in this Petition is dated 25.06.2008. 2. That order has already been implemented. The respondent has been reinstated in the service and he has been paid 50% of the backwages. Submission of the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners that the petitioners want to initiate departmental enquiry against the respondent and it is apprehended that the observations that have been made 20.wp.402-10 2 in the order of the MAT may be misused by the petitioner to challenge the enquiry. In our opinion, the apprehension is misplaced because whatever observations have been made by the MAT are relevant only for the purpose of setting aside the order of dismissal which was made without holding enquiry, and those are not relevant for any other purposes. In this view of the matter, in our opinion, it will not be appropriate to entertain the Petition. Petition is rejected. (D.K. DESHMUKH,J.) (A.R. JOSHI, J.)