1 caa1347 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1347 OF 2009 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.964 OF 2010 Rajdeep Raheja Finance Corporation ...Applicant vs. Smt.Pushalata Amrut Gandhi & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Vineet Naik i/b M/s.Doijode Associates for the applicant Mr.V.A.Thorat Sr.Adv.i/b Mr.R.A.Lokhande for respondent nos.3 and 5 Mr.D.A.Nalawade for the respondent no.4 CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : FEBRUARY 8,2011 P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Admittedly, during the pendency of the application for injunction in the trial Court, there was no ad-interim relief granted in favour of the applicant. It is stated that the application for injunction was filed in the year 2009 but the trial Court did not grant any ad-interim relief on the said application. Therefore, as of today, no relief can be granted in favour of the applicant. As the suit is pending and the appeal is pending, it is obvious that if any further third party rights are created by the respondents, the same will be subject to further orders which may be passed in the appeal and or in the suit. 2 The pendency of this appeal will not operate as stay to the proceedings of the suit and the trial Court is free to proceed with the suit. Application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE