@ C?/m7/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P5No. 'l 1% /200§L (3.13.) PETITIONER /Sfnt. Madhu Pandey /. RESPONDENTS 1/ State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretaly , Education Department , D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 1 ,2/ Director of public Instruction Pensionbada Raipur (C.G.) W WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA / 9" [<JMA W/o Shri Sunil Kumar Pandey, I \oAfr v -' ‘. aged about 41 years, R/o ’ I . Kyvr Takhatpur, Bilaspur (C.G.) «$9 \g *§K¢% ......... / VERSUS /’” ‘\ HIGH couaT oF CHHAmseARH AT anAsPun é l w. P. (5) No. 1166 af 2007 Pefi'rioner : Sum. Madhu Pondey Versus RespondeMs sum of ehhmiswh a. meme.- Singl: Bunch: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sufish K. Agniha‘h'i. Mr. Kumnresh Tiwnri, Advoca‘l'e for me pe‘ri‘rioner. Sm‘l'. Anju Ahuja, Depu‘ry Govzmmn'f Advocn‘re for 1h: Side/respondents. O R D E R (Passed on mis 28'” Day of February, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for fha pefifioner aubmi'ts That the pe'ri'l'ioner is working as Assistant Teacher/Lee'turcr. The petitioner obtained B. Ed. Examirmion certificate in the year 1992, on his own expenses. Learned counsel ¢pearing .for the petitioner submits that the question involved, herein asto whether the teacher, who obtained B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses is entitled to two advance increments. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Vashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mmicipal Corporation. Durg Md another {2006 (H) MPJ'R—C5 96}. This Court in the ms? of Yashwant Kuniar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B. Edi /8.T.I. Examination Certificate on their own expenses, are covered by 'l'he circular dated 24.12.98 issued by ‘the 5mm Govemmen‘l’ of Mudhya Pradesh. Learned counsel for the pe'l'i'fioner furfher wbmifs 1'hai ‘rhe fads and question of law involved in 1he present case are squarely covered by decision of this Courf in the case of Vashinn‘t Kunar Bhoradwaj Vs‘ Municipal Corporation, burg and anofher (Supra), 1’0 which learned counsel appearing for he respondents fairly concedes and agrees wiih the averment made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Vashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation. burg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. l Sdl- l l l Satish K. Agnihotri l l Judge Subhash