IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 12TH DECEMBER 2011 / 21ST AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32969 of 2011(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. RAGIN LAL K.P, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O K.P.RADHAKRISHNAN, SUBEENA HOUSE, CHORODE PO, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DT 673 106. 2. ABDUL LATHEEF K.M AGED 24 YEARS, KARIYAMMAKOOL, KUNINGHAD, PURAMERY, KOZHIKODE 673503. 3. SHAHID N.U, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.UMMAR, NECHIKKADAN HOUSE, THANISH PO, KARUVARAKUNDU, MALAPPRUAM 676523. 4. ANWAR SADATH U.P. AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.U.P.MUHAMMED ALI, URUNIYAN PULAKKAL HOUSE, CHEMMALASSERY PO, MALAPPURAM 679323. BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN WPC NO.32969/11 -2- RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DT. 2. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DT. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.32969/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 29.11. 2011 SUBMITTED BY FIRST PETITIONER. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 1.12.2011 SUBMITTED BY SECOND PETIITONER. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 1.12.2011 SUBMITTED BY THIRD PETITIONER. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 28.11.11 SUBMITTED BY FOURTH PETITIONER. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 32969 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 12th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 3rd Semester and the 1st and IInd Semester (Combined) B.Tech examination was declared, petitioners failed in some papers. They applied for revaluation as per Exts.P1 to P4 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the University for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp //True Copy// PA to Judge