IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22435 of 2008 Between: P.D.V. Abraham Lincon, S/o. Devadanam, R/o. Ongole, Prakasam District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The State, Rep by the Principal Secretary to Govt. of A.P. Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Secretary to Government of A.P., Law (Law & J Courts) Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad 3 The District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole 4 Idamakanti Mallikarjuna Reddy, S/o. Not Known, Prakasam District at Ongole 5 Smt. Chiluka Latha, S/o. Not Known, Prakasam District at Ongole 6 Sri Pallapolu Venka Reddy, S/o. Not Known, Prakasam District at Ongole 7 Sri Jonnakuti Mokshanandam, S/o. Not Known, Prakasam District at Ongole 8 Sri Inakollu Venkateswarlu, S/o. Not Known, Prakasam District at Ongole ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction particularly in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction the 1st respondent not to make appointment to the post of public prosecutor for the court of principal District & Sessions court pursuant to the panel prepared and forwarded by the 3rd respondent in Rc.nO.CI/366/2008 dated 5.6.2008 and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to prepare fresh panel of advocates for the said posts in consultation with the District& Sessions Judge, Ongole, Prakasam. Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. V.R. Avula Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: G.P., Law & Legislative Affairs Counsel for respondent No.4: Mr. G. Ramachandra Reddy Counsel for respondent No.6: Mr. Syed Ghouse Basha Counsel for respondent No.7: Mr. B. Devanand Counsel for respondent No.8: Mr. I. Koti Reddy The Court made the following Order: It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. August 7, 2009 MRR ... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP {RLD}