IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 362 OF 2009 SHRI. J. S. ALMEIDA ... Petitioner Versus MRS. OLGA ALMEIDA (DECEASED) THROUGH LR'S ... Respondent Mr. D. J. Pangam,Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. C. A. Coutinho, Advocate for respondent no. 1(a), 1(b) and 1(c). Ms. S. Linhares, Additional Government Advocate holding Mr. Vivek Rodrigues, Aga, for respondent no.3. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 25th March, 2011 P.C. Mr. D. Pangam, is present on behalf of petitioner and Mr. C. A. Coutinho, is present on behalf of respondent no.1(a), 1(b) and 1(c) and Ms. S. Linhares, Additional Government Advocate holding Mr. Vivek Rodrigues, Aga, for respondent no.3. 2. The undertaking filed by the respondent no. 1(b) is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. By the said undertaking respondent no.1(b) undertakes to demolish the illegal construction ordered to be demolished by the Deputy Director of Panchayats, Margao. The said undertaking is accepted. 3. Mr. Pangam appearing for the petitioner states that in order to avoid any further dispute, it would be appropriate to ensure that demolition is carried out in the presence of Block Development Officer Margao or his representatives. 4. I find merit in the submission of Mr. Pangam. 5. Respondent no.1(b) shall inform in writing the date of demolition at least seven days in advance to Block Development Officer, South Goa Marga. The Block Development Officer shall either personally remain present or depute his representative at the time of demolition of illegal construction undertaken to be demolished by respondent no.1(b). He shall ensure that demolition is carried out in terms of judgment passed by Deputy Director of Panchayat, South Goa Margao. Respondent no.1(b) shall also give notice of date of demolition to the petitioner. 6. Although undertaking is signed by the respondent no.1(b), Mr.Coutinho states that respondent no.1(a) and (c) also have no objection for demolition of illegal construction. Statement made by Mr. C. A. Coutinho, Advocate is accepted. 7. In view of above, nothing survives in this Writ Petition and hence, Writ Petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. A. P. LAVANDE, J. vn