IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10492 of 2010 JYOTI KUMARI W/O SAMBHU KUMAR SUMAN R/O VILL +P.O.BASAITHI, P.S.RANIGANJ, DISTT-ARARIYA. VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE ARARIYA 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION ARARIYA 4. MUKHIYA , GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ BASAITHI, P.O.BAISAITHI, P.S.RANIGANJ, DISTT-ARARIYA 5. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ BASAITHI, P.O.BASAITHI, P.S.RANIGANJ, DISTT-ARARIA 6. DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY ARARIYA THROUGH ITS MEMBER P.O.+P.S.ARARIYA, DISTT- ARARIYA. ----------- 02 13.09.2010 The petitioner submits that the District Teacher Appellate Tribunal, Arariya in Case No.88/09 has set aside the selection of petitioner as Panchayat Teacher which was done on 13.11.2007. After perusing the order of the Tribunal, it is clear that petitioner was neither made a party nor notice was issued to the petitioner nor petitioner granted an opportunity of hearing before the order terminating the services of the petitioner was passed. In that view of the matter, the order of the Tribunal cannot be sustained and is set aside as being void ab inito. The matter is remanded to the Tribunal, who would, after issuing the notice and hearing the parties, pass appropriate orders in accordance with law afresh. As the matter is old, the Tribunal would conclude the proceedings preferably within one month from the date of production of a copy of this order before the Tribunal. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Trivedi/ (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)