IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4507 of 2010 PROF.(DR.)NANHU PRASAD SAHU SON OF LATE THAKUR PRASAD SAHU, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- DALHATTA BAZAR, P.S. KOTWALI MUNGER, DISTRICT- MUNGER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM- SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA 2. THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 4. TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR 5. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR 6. THE REGISTRAR, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR 7. THE FINANCE OFFICER, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR 8. THE PRINCIPAL, R.D. & D.J. COLLEGE, MUNGER. ----------- 2 16.03.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the respondent-University. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has superannuated on 7th February, 1993 from the post of Professor in Physics from the respondent University. It is submitted that although the petitioner is receiving the monthly pension of Rs. 8023/- instead of Rs. 8200/-, and as such, the authorities are obliged to revise the pension of the petitioner and to consider the claim of payment of some other dues in terms of the extant instructions. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- University submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.6. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the representation of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable could also be paid to the petitioner along with statutory interest, if any, as per the rule. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)