1 jpc/­ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 522 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 80 OF 2009 Rakesh V. Shetty .. Applicant Vs. Shri N. C. Patil and others .. Respondents Shri Kedar J. Patil, for the Applicants Shri J. P. kharge, APP for the Respondent­State CORAM :SMT. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 22nd September, 2009. P. C. 1. Heard. 2. This application is preferred for restoration of the Revision. Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the criminal revision is filed by the original complainant against the order of transfer of the Sessions Case No. 17 of 2007 from the file of Additional Sessions Judge Ichalkaraji to the Sessions Judge, Kolhapur. It is submitted that due to communication gap between the counsel and clerk, the Revision was dismissed in default on 21st August, 2009. Learned counsel submits that the copy of this application for restoration is also served on the learned counsel for the respondents on 10th 2 September, 2009. 3. Considering the reasons stated herein above, the application is allowed. Criminal Revision Application 80 of 2009 is restored to file. 4. Applicant to serve the respondents, afresh, returnable after six weeks. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)