IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 225 of 2004 (M/B) M/s PCL Intertech Lenhydro Consortium Joint Venture, Having its Office at Plot No. 18, Kotla Lane, Rouse Avenue, New Delhi, Through its Power of Attorney, Sri P. Nageshwar Rao S/o Sri Pitchaiah, District Guntur (A.P.), Presently residing at 4 Manvendra Nagar, Rishikesh (U.A.) ........... Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, Through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 2. District Magistrate, Tehri, District Tehri Garhwal. 3. Superintendent of Police, Tehri, Tehri Garhwal. 4. General Manager, THDC, Koteshwar. .......... Respondents Mr. M.S. Bisht, Advocate on behalf of Mr. A.K. Gautam, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondents Nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No. 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon. Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon. M.M. Ghildiyal, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. M.S. Bisht, Advocate on behalf of Mr. A.K. Gautam, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondents Nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No. 4. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition, now, has become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 11.05.2006 11.05.2006 A