15c. cr appa 977-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 977 OF 2010 IN APPEAL (ST) NO. 588 OF 2010 Shama Hussain Shaikh .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the Applicant Mr. V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the State CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J DATE : 14th SEPTEMBER,2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant-original accused has been convicted under Section 326 of IPC. The appeal preferred by the applicant against the said order is pending. The applicant is now seeking bail. 3. The case of the prosecution is the incident took place on account of some dispute between the applicant and Farida. PW 11 Dr. Pankaj Thackery has stated that Farida sustained burn injuries ranging from 18 to 20%. 1 15c. cr appa 977-10.doc 4. Learned advocate for the applicant stated that besides this case, the applicant has a clean record. He further stated that the applicant was on bail during the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. Both these statements have not been controverted by learned APP. Thus, looking to the nature of injuries and all above facts and also considering that the applicant is a lady, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. Hence, the order: O R D E R 1. Applicant Shama Hussain Shaikh be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- [Rs. Twenty Five Thousand Only] with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The Applicant shall report to the Palghar Police Station once in a month till disposal of the appeal. 2. Application is allowed in above terms. [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 2 15c. cr appa 977-10.doc 3