IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.185 of 2009 BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION . Versus SUDHIR KUMAR & ORS . ----------- 3/ 11/08/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent No.1. On the submissions made on behalf of the parties it is more than apparent that both, the petitioner and respondent No.1, must share the blame equally for not having brought proper facts to the attention of the Court that during pendency of the writ application itself on 30.1.2008, a fresh show cause notice had been issued to the respondent No.1 duly replied by him on 15.2.2008. If this Court found certain errors in the show cause notice earlier issued and the errors have been rectified by the issuance of a fresh show cause notice, there is no occasion for the Court to review its order dated 7.8.2008. The respondent No.1 has already responded to the fresh show cause notice. The petitioner is not precluded in any manner by reason of the order in C.W.J.C. No.13738/06 from taking a fresh decision thereupon in accordance with law and the earlier order of this Court does not prevent or inhibit the petitioner in any manner from doing so. The review application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)