IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO : 16642 of 1994 Between: 1.M. Ravi Kumar S/o. Thimmanna, aged 28 years, R/o. Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District. 2.Nadipi Ayyanna, S/o Chinna Shalanna, R/o. Alampur, Mahabubnagar District. 3.Mohd. Mastan, S/o Doulat Sab R/o Camel Steet, Near Gandla Sivakumar's House, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. The Joint Collector, Mahabubnagar. 2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District. 3. Muthyala Venkamma, W/o Chenniah, R/o Chintalapet, Gadwal Town, Mahabubnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to call for the concerned records from the 1st respondent, relating to the proceedings dated 4-7-1994 in case No. B8/2/94 wherein he had confirmed the orders of the 2nd respondent dated 3-12-1993 in No. H/1398/92 and quash the same by issuance of a Writ, Direction, or Order, particularly one in the nature of Certiorari. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.R.V.SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondents 1 and 2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Mr. V.V. Narasimha Rao. The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed against the order passed by the 1st respondent-Joint Collector, Mahabubnagar, in Case No.B8/2/94 dated 04.07.1994 confirming the order passed by the 2nd respondent-Mandal Revenue Officer dated 03.12.1993. The 1st respondent-Joint Collector, Mahaboobnagar, after going into the facts of the case and having exercised his discretion, held that no revision lies against the order of the 2nd respondent-Mandal Revenue Officer, under Section 9 of the A.P. (Rights in Land) and Pattedar Pass Books Act, 1971. The 1st respondent has given sufficient and cogent reasons in dismissing the revision filed by the petitioners. Therefore, I see no reason or justification to interfere with the order passed by the 1st respondent. However, learned Counsel for the petitioner sought leave of this Court to approach the appropriate authority for appropriate relief. Accordingly leave is granted. The writ petition is accordingly closed. No costs. ______________ 15th July, 2004 Nsr/Gsn ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Joint Collector, Mahabubnagar. 2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District. 3. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 4. Two CD copies.