IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1195 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6354 of 2010 ====================================================== Tribhuwan Roy, S/o Shri Ramdin Roy, R/o Village Pahleja, P.O. Jaipur, P.S. and District-Arwal, At present R/o Mohalla- Ashokpuri, Khajpura, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, Distt.- Patna. .... Petitioner .... Appellant Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary Transport Department, Govt. of Bihar, Bailey Road, Patna. 3. The State Transport Commissioner, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Transport Department, Bihar, Patna. 5. The Joint Secretary-cum-Conducting Officer, Transport Deptt., Bihar, Patna. .... Respondents.... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Jitendra Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nadim Seraj, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kaushal Kumar, S.C.-4 with Mr. Amish Kumar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 5 29-09-2011 Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 28th January 2011 passed by the learned single Judge in above CWJC No.6354 of 2010, the writ petitioner has preferred the present Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. Patna High Court LPA No.1195 of 2011 (5) dt.29-09-2011 2 The appellant, a Government servant, has been facing a disciplinary proceeding on the charge of amassing wealth beyond his known sources of income. Pending the disciplinary proceeding the supplementary charge has been issued on 15th February 2010. It is the said supplementary charge which was the subject matter of challenge in the writ petition. The writ petition has been dismissed by the learned single Judge. We have heard learned counsel Mr. Jitendra Singh extensively. No interference at this stage of enquiry is warranted. In the event the charge is held to be proved and a penalty is imposed upon the appellant, in challenge to such order, the appellant can raise all available grounds including the ground of maintainability of the charge. Subject to the above observation, the Appeal is dismissed in limine. Anjani /- (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)