1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2540 OF 2006 Nahalchand Laloochand Pvt. Ltd. ... Petitioner Vs. M.M.C. & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. J. Reis with Mr. R.N. Kachare for Petitioner. Mrs. P.A. Purandhare for Respondents. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: OCTOBER 03, 2006 DATED: OCTOBER 03, 2006 DATED: OCTOBER 03, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Rule. Heard forthwith. . The Petition involves adoption and maintenance of the R.G. area. We have made reference to circular in the order in companion Petition No. 2571 of 2006 which we have disposed of by the separate order. . It is the case of the Petitioners that they have first preference to adopt and maintain the R .G. area in terms of the policy of Respondent Corporation and they have applied for the said purpose. . On behalf of the Respondent Corporation, their learned counsel makes a statement that they have invited offers for adoption and maintenance of R.G. 2 area. Apart from Petitioners, there is one more party which has applied. Both the applications will be considered and disposed of according to law. In the meantime, till such decision, considering letter dated 29.10.2005, addressed to the Petitioners, the Petitioners will maintain the said R.G. area till such time as the decision is taken by the Corporation. Statement made on behalf of the Corporation is accepted. The Petitioner is allowed to continue maintaining the R.G. area till such time the Corporation takes decision according to law. . Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)