THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P. No. 5196 of 2009 Oral order: This C.R.P. is directed against the order dated 09.09.2009, passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy, marking the promissory note dated 18.12.2002 as Ex. A1 subject to objection. The learned counsel for the petitioners-defendants submitted that since the pro note is deficiently stamped, the same cannot be marked in evidence, but the Court below without deciding the question as to whether the pro note is deficiently stamped and whether it is admissible in evidence, has marked the same in evidence as Ex. A1 subject to objection, and therefore, the marking of pro note as Ex. A1 in evidence, is liable to be set aside. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners- defendants, I see no reason whatsoever to interfere with the order under revision marking the pro note as Ex. A1 in evidence, and more so when the same is marked subject to objection, which is the normal practice. If according to the petitioners-defendants, the pro note is deficiently stamped, he can take that plea at the time of arguments, but certainly, he cannot ask the Court not to mark the same, unless and until the issue whether the pro note is deficiently stamped or not is decided, and more so if the pro note is deficiently stamped, the same can be got impounded, for collection of stamp duty and penalty thereon. For the foregoing reasons, I find no reason whatsoever to interfere with the order under revision in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The C.R.P. is devoid of merit, and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: December, 2009. KSR