1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR S.B. Crl. Revision Petition No.289/2010 (Gopal Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of Order : 22.03.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI Mr.N.S.Shekhawat for Mr.M.K.Kaushik, for the petitioner. Mr.Laxman Meena, PP. By the Court: By this revision petition, the order dated 04.12.2009 has been challenged whereby the charges have been framed against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charges have been framed against the petitioner for offence under Sections 363, 366, 366A, 342, 376(2) (G) of IPC. The petitioner is not involved in the matter, which is now coming out from the affidavit submitted by the prosecutrix herself and otherwise, written request was made to the I.G. Police for fair investigation, however, all these aspects were ignored and charges have been framed against the petitioner. It is alternatively prayed that if the order for framing of the charges is not quashed, then a direction may be given to the Court below to expedite the trial. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2 At this stage of framing of the charges, new material cannot be looked into at the instance of the petitioner. Whatever material exists on record was looked into by the trial Court and charges have been framed accordingly. In view of the aforesaid, I am not inclined to interfere in the order impugned herein. Accordingly, the revision petition so preferred by petitioner is dismissed. The Court below is, however, directed to expedite the trial and if possible then to complete the same as soon as possible. (M.N. BHANDARI),J. Preety Item NO.9