IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 1460 of 2007. [O&M] Date of Decision: 14th July, 2009. Jatinder Kumar Petitioner through Mr. Arun Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate. Versus Man Mathan Lal Respondents through Mr. G.S.Sawhney, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) This Revision Petition is directed by the petitioner – tenant, who has been ordered to be evicted from the demised premises comprising shop No. 187, situated at Piara Chowk, Yamuna Nagar by the Rent Controller, Jagadhri vide his order dated 7.11.2005 which has been further upheld by the Appellate Authority vide its order dated 26.2.2007. Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto, learned counsel for the parties are present. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner-tenant, who is present in Court, states that the petitioner does not want to contest the revision petition on merits, provided he is granted one year's time to vacate the premises. Learned counsel for the respondent – landlord fairly agrees to the offer made by the petitioner, who has also stated on Oath that he shall hand-over the peaceful vacant possession of the subject premises to the respondent – landlord on or before 31.07.2010. He further undertakes that the arrears of rent, if any, shall be paid within one month from today and he shall continue to pay the monthly rent before 10th day of each English calendar month till he vacates the shop, as stipulated above. The revision petition is disposed of in above given agreed terms and conditions which shall remain binding upon the parties. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 14, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE