IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP-T No. 5838/2008 Decided on:16.6.2010 _____________________________________________ Kiewal Kishore. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. Advocate General. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that his case was not considered for appointment to the post of Physical Education Teacher batch-wise. It has come in the reply that minimum age prescribed in column No.8 was 18 years and the maximum age limit was 38 years. The date of birth of the petitioner, as per the record, was 19.10.1960. Thus, he had already crossed the upper age limit of 38 years as on 20.10.1998. In view of this, the name of the petitioner was not sponsored. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 16.6.2010 *awasthi*