HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.17837 of 2007 Dated 28th July 2011 Between: Nalla Lokanatham …Petitioner And The District Collector, Srikakulam and two others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri K.Bheema Rao Counsel for respondents: GP for Land Acquisition The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue any writ more particularly in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent in issuing notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, published in Andhra Bhoomi daily dated 27.09.2006, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the A.P. Agricultural Land (Conversion for non-agricultural purposes) Act, 2006.” At the hearing, Sri K.Bheema Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, stated that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.22863 of 2007 filed by the writ petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 28th July 2011 DR