CWP No.18572 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CASE NO.: CWP No.18572 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION: October 30, 2008 JATINDER SINGH ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA. PRESENT: MR. S.K. JAIN, ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER. ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J.(ORAL) Pursuant to advertisement dated 29.8.2007 (Annexure P-1), the petitioner applied for appointment to the post of DPE(Master). The petitioner applied in the Physically Handicap category. Counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.4 who had secured 54.4479 marks has been selected and appointed as DPE(Master) whereas, the petitioner who had secured 56.1542 has been ignored. A perusal of the select list (Annexure P-9) shows that the petitioner had applied in the Handicap category (Ortho) whereas, respondent No.4 had applied in the Handicap category (Deaf & Dumb). Learned counsel submits that the petitioner had applied as handicap candidate being deaf and dumb. In support of it he has placed reliance on Annexure P-7 dated 26.9.2007. A perusal of the Certificate (Annexure P-7) shows that it has been procured after the last date of filing of the applications. Even the CWP No.18572 of 2008 -2- select list (Annexure P-9) does not show that the petitioner had applied in the Handicap category being a deaf and dumb candidate. Thus, in this view of the matter, we do not find it a fit case for interference in writ jurisdiction. The petitioner is, however, given liberty to file an appropriate representation before the competent authority. In case any such representation is filed, the same be decided within a period of two months from the date of filing of the representation. Writ petition disposed of. (ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA) JUDGE October 30, 2008 (RAJAN GUPTA) Gulati JUDGE