23 HIGH COURT OF CHEATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 2834 of 2007 PETITIONERS Santosh Kumar Maura Aged about 40 Years, S/o. Shri Ganga Ram Maura, Assistant Taachgrg Govt, Middéc SGhool HalahulL Block Kharsia, Disft. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Sacremry, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawani Raiput (C.GE) The Director Public Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) District Education OEicer Raigarh District Raigarh (C,G.) Block Education Officer Kharsia (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) “TRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA; Single Bench : Hon’ble Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. Present: RESPONDENTS 3. 4. 5 ORDER Shri Anil Mouryag Advocate for the petitioner, Shii Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. (Passed on 8m day of May, 20 7) The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay Scale w.e.f the date of initial appointment or hem the date of completion ofprobation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same as to that of in W.P.(S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh & Others), which was allowed vide order dated 7. l 1.2006. In View of the above-stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, thewrit petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge LNJA. ”3.; V Amit Sd/— l ‘ l 1