aw K @ 8> -EK m THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION m No. 553?? of 2009 Petitioners (1)’/M/s Saha Brothers Biri Works Pvt. Ltd. a Company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 having its registered office P.O. Dhuliyan, Distt-Murshidabad, West Bengal through Gauri Shankar Agrawal, S/o Narsinh La! Agrawal aged about 52 years, resident of Shailendra Nagar, Raipur, (C.G.) Shri Gauri Shankar Agrawal, Slo Narsinh Lal Agrawal aged about 52 years, resident of Shailendra Nagar, Raipur, (C.G.) SE%£E EEN$§§ Versus / Resgondents (1) State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Department of F; Commercial Tax, D.K.S. ,Mantraiaya Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest Produce (T&D) Cooperative Federation Limited, A-25 V.i.P. Estate Near V.i.P. Ctub Khamardih Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) through Managing gee/Director. ‘ (3) Managing Director District Minor ’ V Forest Produce Cooperative (2) H Before: ) Q Union Ltd. & Conservator of Forest, Raipur (C.G.). (A (4) Commissioner Commercial Tax Vanijyik Kar Bhavan, Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.) Hon'ble the Chief Justice and his comganion iudges of the Hon'bie High Court of Judicature Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur. 1nq?n§5qh5@mag3gg§§§3L \Lw (I? W200 mmm mm wW %31‘fim311%a SB i Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Aqnihott . 1—10—2010 _ Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Shr Sharma, Shri B.D. Guru, Shri Par TiWari, Shri Ajay Mishra, Shri Ha Patel, Shri Ratan Pusty, Shri A Dalpati, Shri P.K. Badhuri & ShrH for the respective petitid’ners. Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, DepuT State/respondents. ‘ Common order has been p‘ No.2060 of 2002 (M/s Shyam Biri Chhattisgarh & Others) including tr Signed and dated. On the request of learned petitioners, the effect and operaty M/s. Shyam Biri Works Ltd. (su‘ matters shall not be given effect t< from today. Certified copy as judgment & order. per Gowri Neelabh Dubey, Ms. Smiti kaj Shrivastava, Shri V.R. 'sh Wardhan, Shri Sanjay ,mrito Das, Shri Akhilesh .nup Majumdar, Advocates ‘y Advocate General for the assed & delivered in W.P. Works Ltd. v. The State o is petition, counsel appearing for the on of the order passed in pra) and other connected , for a period of four weeks rules along with main a: ragsoi [ sd/- ‘5» f ‘ ‘ K.Ag1tthmri i Judge ’ " ."$atish ‘ —yer .k tourist. uTn‘a‘zmfa — ’ PSI! t7~2r20l0 ——:,oo,ooo. amm (W) f ’