XI-HC—78 3TT^T ^T'f^fhF ^T^T 3T1^T 5b*licr) <f *ll*lCTl (h*1icf» ^oEf r^t|<L||^|<L|^ ^itl1<H^<o, [®|<r11<H^< ^P.CS3-^o.^3-g8/02 •"^ 200 31T^?T TT^' (ll?^<B<<i^) ^RHW Trf^T 3?T^T PETITIONBRS Kalicliferan Choull Divisic) Metricl Distt. M^PONDBltTS 1. State Secret^ry D.K.S.I 2. The (^ (CG) 3. AssisU Jashpt 4. Block Distt. Writ Petitioa U/A 226/1 S.B. HOrBL®SHmj>HI.RENEJ 22.09.2008 Shri S.K, Bajpai, counsel| Shri P.K. Bhadiiri, Paiiel] HeaiU. This petitiou i,s directecjl passed by tlie Collector, petitioner has been suspended| (Classification, Controland Ap^ <=i>)i€<(<>i<i1i 'W^ff ^ 'fe^t <P»i<^i< i:)'3tRW3TT^T Chouhan S/o Late Chainru .an, aged about 52 yeai's, Upper »n Teacher/ Superintendent of Post Boy Hostel, Posted at Patthalgaon, Jashpur (CG) Versus of Chhattisgai'h, through the department of Tribal Welfare, Bhawan, Raipur (CG) ?ollector, JashpLir, Distt, Jashpur ^iit. Commissioner; Tribal WelfaTe, \ir, Distt. Jashpur (CG) Education Ofilcer^ Patthaigaon^ ^Tashpur (CG) ?27 oftlie Constitution oflndia RA MISHRA. J. [for the petitioner, [La^vyer, for tlie State. against the order of Aniiexiire' . P~ 1 Ti^bal Welfare, Jashpur, whereby the lunder Rule 9 ofthe C.G. Civil Seivices l>eal) Rules, 1966. | ^WWI W*11<!|» 7^ ^i^icn^,^Til^^<o,[^cni^^< /-p-r^^o. ^2.8S/^g V% 200 w ^n^r^^K (<i?^^) ^^ 'sprk^ WT ^^ ^^ <(/ 'S^TW^feT ^T^T beto Learaed coiuisel for the not coBipetent to pass the impngr pf the petitioner is Asstt. Coiiirais argued th.at the petitioner has iastance of the Block Edwation O On fhe other hand, leanied the petitioner has alteinative rem the above rules aad fhe m.stao.t pe grouiid of availability of alteraativ Having heard learaed tlie fact tliat petitiouer has Court is not inclmed fo interfere ir The petition is accordiagly d petiyioner <4)i^id^i'i HW^ ^f t^^ <r»«^i< ^T 3TRfH 3TT^ siibiidtted tliat tlie Collector is [ed order as the appoiiiting autliority ^ioner, Tribal Welfare. It was furfher suspended on false ground at the Ricer. l^ounsel for fhe State, subimtted that |edy to ffle appeal iinder Rule 23 of ^titiou is liable to be dismissed on tiae reraedy, for the paities, haviiig regaixl to reisiedy of filmg appeal, this the iiapugned order. dlisniissed. "~ Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge pe|tit counbel alteilnative ^^t7T ?N^ H^lt^, ^WTra- —FS/S97—3/2008 —40,000.