IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO 963 OF 2008 Ms.Minakshi Maheshwari ...Petitioner vs K.P.M.G. (India) Pvt.Ltd & 4 ors... Respondents. --- Mr.C.S.Balsara i.b Ms.Ameya Tamhane for Petitioner. Ms.INdu Malhotra Sr.Advocate with Mr.Kevic Setalvad, Mr.T.Kanvian, Ms.Sonal Matker i.b AZB Partners for Respondents CORAM: D.K.Deshmukh & N.D.Deshpande, JJ DATED: 18th November, 2010 P.C. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that he should be granted leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to prosecute his complaint which according to him is pending before respondent no.3. 2. The learned counsel appearing for respondent nos.1 and 2 disputes the position that any complaint of the petitioner is pending before respondent no.3. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to prosecute her complaint before the respondent no.3 if it is found to be pending. All contentions available to both the sides are kept open. D.K.Deshmkh, J N.D.Deshpande, J