sk 1 wp5355.09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.5355 OF 2009 Shri Murlidhar Baburao Landge & Ors. : Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. : Respondents .... Mr.A.S.Daver with Mr.S.Y.Mulani i/b. M/s.Mulani & Co., for the petitioners. Ms M.P.Thakur, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for respondent no.1. Mr.S.R.Ganbavale for respondent no.2. .... CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : AUGUST 16, 2011. P.C.: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respective respondents. 2. This Writ Petition is directed against the order/communication dated 19.11.2007 passed by the Deputy Director, Town Planning, Pimpri- Chinchwad Municipal Corporation whereby the application of the petitioners for grant of TDR in view of the land affected by development of road came to be rejected. sk 2 wp5355.09 3. At the outset, the counsel for the respondent no.2 has submitted that the Planning Authority is ready and wiling to withdraw the order dated 19.11.2007 and also ready and willing to re-consider the application of the petitioners for grant of TDR submitted on 10.8.2007 afresh, in accordance with law, on its own merit and shall take a decision accordingly within a period of four weeks from today. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that if the order dated 19.11.2007 has been withdrawn in view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent no.2, in that event, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petition may be disposed of accordingly by keeping the issues open. 5. In view of the above referred facts, it appears that the order dated 19.11.2007 has been withdrawn by the Planning Authority. Similarly, by withdrawal of the said order, the proposal of the petitioners dated 10.8.2007 for grant of TDR in lieu of land affected by development of road would stand revived which would be considered afresh by the Planning Authority, in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard within four weeks. In that view of the matter, nothing further sk 3 wp5355.09 is required to be done in the present petition. The same is disposed of accordingly. (D.D. SINHA, J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)