IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH JULY 2007 / 20TH ASHADHA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1984 of 2007() ------------------------------ CRA.17/2005 of ADDL. SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC), PATHANAMTHITTA CC.93/2004 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-I, PATHANAMTHITTA .................... REVN. PETITIONER: APPELLANT/ACCUSED ----------------------------------- SALAMMA MATHEW, W/O YOHANNAN MATHEW, AGED 48 YEARS, VEERAPALLIL VEEDU, KANNAMKODE MURI, ADOOR VILLAGE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS SRI.ROSHEN.D.ALEXANDER RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. BASHEER,(DIED)SARWADEEN BHAVAN, CHIRANICKAL, PUTHUMALA P.O., ADOOR VILLAGE. 3. RASHEEDA, SAVADEEN BHAVAN, CHIRANICKAL, PUTHUMALA P.O., ADOOR VILLAGE. (LEGAL HEIR OF R2 IMPLEADED AS ADDL. PARTY AS PER IN CRL.M.P.1685/06 DT.19.10.06 ON THE FILES OF ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE(AD HOC)COURT-1, PATHANAMTHITTA) BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.GIBI.C.GEORGE THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Crl.R.P. No. 1984 OF 2007 ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 11th day of July, 2007 O R D E R The revision petitioner, who was the accused in C.C. No.93/2004 on the file of the JFCM-I, Pathanamthitta for an offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against her concurrently by the trial court for the said offence. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter and have filed Crl.M.A.No.7481/2007 under section 147 of the Act for recording the composition entered into by them. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. The composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal within the meaning of section 320(8) Cr.P.C. Money, if any, paid by the revision petitioner pursuant to orders, if any, passed by the lower appellate court shall be refunded to the revision petitioner. This revision petition is disposed of as above. (V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE) aks