IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37317 of 2009 RAJESHWAR MAHTON @ RAMESHWAR MAHTON, SON OF SRI RAM SWAROOP MEHTA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHILIAMA, P.S. SIMRA, DISTRICT AURANGABAD. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 12.03.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner’s earlier attempt for grant of bail was refused by this Court as the counsel for the petitioner could not inform this Court about the antecedent of the petitioner. In paragraph-11 of this petition the antecedent of the petitioner has been detailed, wherefrom it appears that besides the present case he is accused in seven other cases for the offence under Sections 395, 396 and other allied Sections of the Penal Code. Present case is for the offence under Section 307 and other allied sections of the Penal Code in which others have been allowed bail. Counsel submits that in this case petitioner has not been named in the First Information Report but has been arrested later on. As the antecedent of the petitioner is bad and he has not yet been released in one of the seven cases, as such, no useful purpose will be served by releasing the petitioner on bail in the present case. The prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is reject with liberty to apply for bail in the present case after he is released in all the seven cases. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha,J.)