IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.172 of 2009 1. Raj Kumar Mahto, son of late Sukhdeo Mahto resident of village Massa, Tola Dhankaul, P.S. Jalley, P.O.Karwa, District Darbhanga. 2. Mohan Mahto son of Jaikant Mahto, resident of village Massa, Tola Dhankaul, P.S. Jalley, P.O.Karwa, District Darbhanga. …...Defendant 2nd party-Appellant 2nd party-Appellant 2nd party-Petitioners. Versus 1.Ram Sewak Mahto, son of late Sukhdeo Mahto, resident of village Massa, tola Dhankaul, P.S. Jalley, P.O. Karwa, District Darbhanga. ……Defendant 1st party-Appellant 1st party-Appellant 1st party. 2. Jai Kant Mahto, son of Shri Chan Mahto 3. Pragash Mahto, son of Jagdish Mahto Both resident of village Massa, Tola Dhankaul, P.S. Jalley, P.O. Karwa, District Darbhanga. ... …Defendant 2nd Party-Appellant 2nd party-Appellant 2nd party. 4. Ram Pratap Mahto, son of Mushar Mahto 5. Ram Lakhan Mahto, son of Mushar Mahto Both resident of village Massa, Tola Dhankaul, P.S. Jalley, P.O. Karwa, District Darbhanga. 6. Smt. Ram Pari Devi, w/o Sukhdev Mahto, resident of village Basopatti, P.S. Harlakhi, P.O. Harlakhi, District Madhubani. 7. Smt. Ram Kali Devi, w/o Pachchu Mahto, resident of village Bahera, P.s. Nannpur, District Sitamarhi. 8. Tej Narain Mahto, son of late Hira Mahto, resident of village Nanpur Bahera, P.O. Pupari, P.S. Pupari, District Sitamarhi. … ..Plaintiffs-Respondents 1st Party-Respondent 1st Party 9. Kari Mahto, son of Jagroom Mahto 10. Ram Dayal Mahto, son of Pritam Mahto, 11. Ram Dahin Mahto, son of Pritam Mahto, Nos. 9 to 11 resident of village Massa, Tola Dhankaul, P.S. Jalley, P.O. Karwa, District Darbhanga ..Defendant 3rd party-Respondent 2nd party-Respondent 2nd Party. 12. Biltu Mahto, son of Ram Swaroop Mahto, Resident of village Massa, Tola Dhankaul, P.S. Jalley, P.O. Karwa, District Darbhanga. …..Defendant 4th Party-Respondent 3rd party-Respondent 3rd 2 party. 13. Fakira Mahto, son of Bhadai Mahto, Resident of village Massa, Tola Dhankaul, P.S. Jalley, P.O. Karwa, District Darbhanga. … Defendant 5th Party-Respondent 4th party-Respondent 4th party- opposite parties. For the petitioners : Mr. Rabindra Nath Kanth, Advocate. For the opposite parties : None. ----------- 05/ 11.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. This case has been filed for review of order dated 26.03.2009 by which this court dismissed S.A. No.323 of 2005 at the stage of hearing under Order XLI Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Although learned counsel for the petitioners argued at length, but from the facts and circumstances of the case, it is quite apparent that there is no error apparent on the face of the record nor there is any fresh material which was not available earlier to take a different view. In the said circumstances, this civil review petition is dismissed. harish/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )