IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 894 OF 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 04/02/2009 in WP NO : 21796 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Smt. R. Chandramani ... APPELLANT AND The Chief Regional Manager, LPG and Duly Constituted Attorney, HPCL, Cherlapally, Hyderabad and another ... RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: Sri A. Rajasekhar Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Sri M. Ravindranath Reddy The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) The learned advocate appearing for the appellant has fairly submitted that the appellant would like to go for arbitration, but, according to him, some observations made by the learned single Judge in the impugned order might adversely affect the appellant. 2. We clarify that the Arbitrator shall not consider the conclusions, if any, arrived at by the learned single Judge while rejecting the petition. In other words, the Arbitrator shall render his opinion only on the basis of evidence, which might be adduced before him. 3. In view of the above clarification, the appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel to disposal of the appeal, WAMP No. 1775 of 2009 filed by the appellant for interim relief stands disposed of as infructuous. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 15th September, 2009 ks