SlnftoBwrh IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PBTITION (C) N0 54% ^ /2011 WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER ^^ .-^ Ay^>"' €^^' 'v>--"' RKSPONDENTS k^\\ ^.^^ ^.],, '/^, Arvind Mishra, S/o Shri Shatrughan ^ W^~ Mishra, Aged about 35 years, R/o- •••^^ - - ~. _ - Purana Toli, Jashpur, Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS '^ (l)Regional Transport Authority, Ambikapur, Surguja (C.G.) (2)Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Ambikapur, Surguja (C.G.) i 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER ^^^-:W^;sh Y.^€- 1»*^» RETITIONER RESPONDENTS HIGN COURTjQR©hMATTIS©ARH:BILASPUR : WKIT PEtiTION (0 N0.3484 OF 2011 ArvindMishra Versus Regional Transport ^ujthority, Ambiksapur &Another (VVriti?etition under Article 226 of the Constltution o? India) , Bingte Bench: Hon'bte Shri SatishK ^nihotri, ± Pri^nt^ ^hrl^ZK. Rao»Achweateforfho^petjtioi^ ShriShashankThakur.F'anelLawyepfortheState. s"::<5Rbl:R^BALy..;'':.^:';'l'::^::....;.:'1';':;;:^^ ^(Passed on mte O^ 1) ; 1) ©rievanceof 4he petitioner fe thafe on 1CM33.2011 ^nnexure P-1), tte pBt^O^^T^^ stagecamage perm^^w Dujclula, Patra^ one retum trip daily. HCTin^er, till date^^t^ same has not feeen declded by ^'the:re§pon(l^. lll';'''-l';'': ' —'- 11~:1 ,:/:—' 1 - ^—^111-.—.-:„.- 1 .. 2) tjearn^^^^ for ttie petitifiiner submits that this petitian may be disposed of with a direction tp^ the respontitente to ^ saiet appli(?ation exped| c^^ ^ ^^^^^^ l^ petitipner ^teK be^considf^ acacor(j|nlioe wth law and on its own merite^ within a perio^ of six weete^ of» -.copyfl^'thjs'ofder.,'"'^' -.-'...--1 -"11:" ^- ^ .- -.'. .1 -:F.-^;,, . . .., 4) In yiew pf fore^pjng, this pefition is dispc^ed of with a dllrecfien to ttie responde^ to dwM^^ fil@dby1hep^jQn®rwitMnapen<^ ofacofsyofttijsoixter; ^ , 5) ^xo^jngly, e w(|t^^p^ Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge ashok