#5‘1 IN THE HIGH GOURT OF JUDIGATURE AT BEASPUR EHHATTISGARH w.p N0. 458 g (299g §gggi§ Ram, Ag§§ gbgm 3§ ygggs, QINM BEW PETITIONER 5/9, §gkh£aj Ram, R/Q. Village Kgtkegat, Past Lghpatfa, Tah Ambikapur, DiStt $11rggzj‘a KEG) VERSUS $tat¢ of Chhattisgarh, ihrgggh; Secretary Pgwhgya: .8; Gramm Vjk§§ Vibhgg, DKS §h§W§Q, Raipyrfg,.G;) S.D.O. Ambikapur, Disirict - Surguja (CG) Chief EX¢¢uiiV¢ GmQear, Janpaé Raygayat, Mpg; S.grggjg, Di§gigt @xggja (9Q) Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Katkona, Jangad Panchayat Katkona, Surguja District Surguja (CG) (f WRIT FETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 225, 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA m HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition N9. 2683 of 2006 Petitioner Sumit Ram Vsmus Resyandfmts State of Chhattisgarh and others s3: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotti, Vacation Judge 3 4.5» Shri V. A. Goverdhan, Advocate for th€ pstitioner. Shri Yashwant Sihgh Thakur, Govt. Advocate. for respondents No. 1 6:. 2. ORAL ORDER ( 5m Juno, 2006) Tho following onicr of tho Court was passed by Sati$h K“ Agnihotri, Vacation Judge. 1, v Laamed counsol for the potitioner, on instruction, Sllbmits that tho patitioner does not Want to pursue. this “agattex: and seeks to withdraw the petition, Learoed counsel fm‘ the respondents/State. has no objectioo. 2. The petitioner is permitted to Withdraw the petition. 3, As a result, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. r Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Vacation Judge [11‘