In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … Civil Revision No. 7293 of 2010 Date of decision: November 10,2010 Kitab Singh and another ..Petitioners Versus Inder Singh ..Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr. Susheel Gautam, Advocate for the petitioners. ... Rakesh Kumar Garg,J.(Oral) This is defendants revision petition challenging the impugned order dated 10.8.2010 whereby the Additional District Judge, Panipat has directed the parties to maintain status quo with regard to the existing position of the suit land till the decision of the suit on an appeal filed against the order dated 27.4.2010 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Panipat, in an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. In nutshell, the plaintiff-respondent is claiming that he is owner in possession of the suit property whereas the defendant-petitioners are claiming that the suit land is a Nalah and the plaintiff respondent is trying to encroach upon the same by filling the earth and raising a wall. It will not be out of place to mention here that as per the report of the Local Commissioner, there exists no Nalah. However, some dirty water was found stagnated. The question whether the suit land belongs to the plaintiff- respondent or that the same is a Nalah can be adjudicated after evidence is led by the parties. Simply because dirty water has accumulated ipsofacto, will not establish at this stage there exist a Nalah through the suit property. Keeping in view the aforesaid factual situation which could not be disputed from any material on the record of the revision petition, I find no error in the impugned order. Dismissed. November 10, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE