:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION MISC. MISC. MISC. PETITION NO. 6 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 6 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 6 OF 2007 IN IN IN T. T. T. & I.J. PETITION NO. 643 OF 1988 & I.J. PETITION NO. 643 OF 1988 & I.J. PETITION NO. 643 OF 1988 Jagannath Govind Hedavkar & Ors. ...Petitioners. V/s. Vijay Govind Hedavkar & Ors. ... Respondents. Mrs. Jyotsna Pandhi for the Petitioners. None for the Respondents ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 03RD 03RD 03RD OCTOBER 2008. OCTOBER 2008. OCTOBER 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . The Petitioner has filed this Petition seeking directions to Respondent No.1 to execute the deed of transfer alongwith Petitioner No.1. 2. At the hearing of this Petition which is filed invoking this Court’s jurisdiction under Sections 301 and 302 of the Indian Succession Act, 1945, Mrs. Pandhi appearing for the Petitioner states that Mr. Vijay Govind Hedavkar has expired. The directions were sought against the said Vijay and he having expired, Section 226 of the Succession Act come into force. Same consequences are provided in Section 312 of the said Act. :2: 3. In such circumstances, the present Petition seeking directions against the deceased Respondent No.1 is rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)