IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2388 OF 2010 Between: Syed Tajuddin …Petitioner And 1. The State of A.P., Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad & 2 others … Respondents This Court made the following: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2388 OF 2010 ORDER: After hearing the petitioner’s counsel and after perusing the order passed by the lower Court, I am of the opinion that some more time need be granted to the revision petitioner to comply with the order passed by the lower Court by way of payment of arrears to the extent of Rs.30,000/-. I do not find any valid or legal reasons to disturb the order passed by the lower Court, particularly when the petitioner’s counsel stated that the petitioner does not intend to go to jail and that the delay in depositing the amount occurred because he was out of the Country in Jedda. 2. In the result, the Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed. But however, four (4) weeks time from today is granted to the petitioner to deposit the entire arrears of Rs.30,000/- in the lower Court or to deposit in the Bank Account of the first respondent. This deposit is subject to the result of Criminal.R.C.No.1687 of 2009. ______________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J December 24, 2010 KL HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2388 OF 2010 December 24, 2010 KL