IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9132 of 2011 Deepak Kumar Garg ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr.Sandeep Kotla, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner is aggrieved against the order passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana primarily on the ground that it had wrongly applied the ratio of law laid down in CWP No.6942 of 2007. As per the counsel, the controversy involved in this writ petition is totally different as the petitioner therein was claiming the escalation, costs and interest accruing on the deposited amount from the date of deposit of the said amount till the offer of possession. Grievance is that the State Consumer Forum without going into the depth of controversy has decided the above-said appeal where the grounds are different. The petitioner has a right to challenge the same by way of appeal in case the Tribunal has wrongly decided the case. Let him invoke his remedy of appeal, rather than changing track and challenging his grievance of charging of interest by the respondents by filing writ petition. Dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to have his alternative remedy to challenge the same. May 23, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE