IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13404 of 2008 LAXMAN THAKUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Pakridayal P.S.Case No. 26 of 2006 registered under sections 323/341/406/420 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is the Uncle (Fufa) of the complainant and it has been alleged that he has taken the Tractor for cultivation fro the complainant although the tractor was the family tractor of the complainant. The further allegation is that this petitioner had promised to pay Rs. 5,000/- per month. It is further submitted that the allegations are absolutely false and the case has been lodged only to humiliate the petitioner, who is a senior member of the family. Considering the submissions as noticed above, the allegations levelled in the first information report, the averments made in the petition as also the materials brought on record, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, the petitioner, Laxman Thakur be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Pakridayal P.S.Case No. 26 of 2006, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)