IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER MONDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2008 / 26TH JYAISHTA 1930 WA.No. 1240 of 2008 ---------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENTIN WPC.16125/2008 Dated 30/05/2008 . ................... APPELLANT/ PETITIONER: ------------------------------------- THOMAS VARKEY, S/O.VARKEY, AGED 67 YEARS, VADAKKEKARA HOUSE, MUTTOM, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 2. THE IDUKKI DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., VAZHATHOPPU, IDUKKI REPRESENTED By ITS GENERAL MANAGER. R1 - BY SPL.GOVT.PLEADER SRI.A.G.ANEETHA. R2 - BY ADV.SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L. DATTU, C.J. & A.K. BASHEER, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A.No. 1240 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of June, 2008 Judgment H.L. Dattu, C. J: This appeal is directed against the orders passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.No.16125/2008 dated 30th of May 2008. 2. In the writ petition the only prayer sought for by the petitioner is to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to pay the balance outstanding towards the dues as per Ext.P1 award, in 30 equal monthly instalments. 3. It is not in dispute or can be disputed by the petitioner/appellant that an award came to be passed before the Lok Adalat in Adalat Case No.144/200. Before the Adalat the parties have compromised. Accordingly an award has been passed on 8th of September 2007. 4. Petitioner, without even questioning the correctness or otherwise of the award passed by the Lok Adalat, is requesting in the writ petition to grant him instalment on the ground that petitioner is unable to comply with the award passed by the Lok Adalat. In our opinion, without questioning the said award, petitioner is not entitled to any one of the reliefs sought for in the writ petition Keeping in view the aforesaid legal position, the learned single Judge has rejected the writ petition. We do not see any infirmity in the orders passed by the learned single Judge. Therefore the appeal is rejected. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU Chief Justice A.K. BASHEER Judge an.