IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 79 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2683 OF 2003 SHRI RAJNARAYAN S. PATHAK ... PETITIONER VS. THE DY. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & Ors. Respondents Petitioner present in person. Mr. M.D.Naik, AGP, for Respondents. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. DATE : 16th December,2005 DATE : 16th December,2005 DATE : 16th December,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By order dated 4.2.2004, the Respondents Nos. 1 to 3 were directed to consider the petitioner’s request for absorption and pass appropriate orers therein in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks after giving an opportrunity tothe petitiioner of hearing in the matter. 2. The learned Counsel for the Respondents submits that the petitioner was given hearing and his request for absorption was considered and rejected by passing appropriate orders. 3. The petitioner is present in person and stated that he was given hearing but the decision taken was not communicated to him. 4. The learned Counsel for the Respondents states that by letter dated 15.10.2004, the decision was com- municated to the petitioner. An affidavit to that effect has been filed. 5. In view of this, the order passed by this Court has been substantially complied with. Now nothing survives in the Petition. The Contempt Petition stands disposed of. ---