THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 699 of 2010. Bhagat Singh S/O Sri Sohan Singh … Petitioner. Vs. Union of India and others. …Respondents. Mr. R.C.Joshi, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Pande, learned Standing Counsel Union of India for the respondents. Date August 16, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Interim Relief Application No. 6819 of 2010) By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the discharge certificate of the petitioner (Annexure No. 2 to the writ petition), whereby the petitioner had been discharged from the Army on 29-4-1999 on the ground of unsuitability. Mr. Vikas Pande, learned Standing Counsel for Union of India appearing for the respondents has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has alternate remedy to approach the Armed Forces Tribunal having jurisdiction under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007 for redressal of his grievance. On the ground of alternate remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed in limine on the ground of alternate remedy. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP