e BBI] C./^Y-yo ^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. S.NO. ^oc^ /2006 PETmONER ^^ >'^'> y.-w^'' ^"~ ^^ ,^c,W '^'-•••'1'/'.'••'' ^^y s^yi i.-.-'' ^yy^ '^•••"" ^* Bahoran Lal Manikpuri,/^ S/o- Shri Sukhram Manikpuri Aged about 43 years R/o- Imlipara, Bilaspur Distt - Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^.^: .00S-t o c <i.y?\s» 3. State of Chhattisgarh, / Through the Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Additional Commissioner, <- Tribal Welfare Department, Bijaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) Collector, Bilaspur District '' Bilaspur (C.G.) ^&^' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA HI6H COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTIS6ARH: BIbtSPUR Single Bench: Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Petitioner W. P.fe) No. 5097 of2006 Bo^ioran Lat AAanikpuri Versus Reqaondents ; State of Chhatt-isgarh A others Mr. Anond Kumar Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. V.V.S. Moorthy, Depvty Advocate Seneral with 5mt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Sovernment Advocate for the respondents/State. OR t> E R (T11 November. 2006) 1. AAr. V.V.5. Moorthy, leamed Deputy Advocate fieneral with Mrs. Anju Ahuja, learned Deputy fiovernment Advocate appearing for the respondents/State submits that the petition has become infructuous as the impugned order dated 28.7.2006 (Annexure P/2) has been withdrawn by order dated 22.9.2006 (Annexure R/l) and the petitioner has been granted salary as per revision on the bosis of St Pay Commission. 2. Mr. Anand Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for the ® petitioner agrees with the submissions made by leou'ned counsel appetiring for the respondents/State. 3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge Bablu ^^^•LS^^^^saEy^^;^^^ ^^f^,^-^^^-^-^^^^^^^^^