1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.110 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9178 OF 2005 NRC Employees’ Union Appellant vs. N.R.C.Limited & ors. Respondents Ms.Hutoxi Tavadia with Mr.M.M.Thorat for the appellant. Mr.P.K.Rele with Mr.R.P.Rele, Mr.Vinod Tayade i/b.Mr.Piyush Shah for the respondents. CORAM : R. M. LODHA & A.S.BAGGA, JJ. DATED : 27th June, 2006 P.C. Even if we assume that the writ petition did not suffer from laches and delay, we find that the dismissal of the writ petition by the learned Single Judge on the grounds set out in paragraphs 7 and 8 of the impugned order cannot be said to suffer from any error of law. No case for interference is made out. The increase in the licence fee towards housing accommodation to the workers by the circular dated 4th April, 1997 is not exorbitant. 2. Dismissed in limine. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) (A.S. (A.S. (A.S. BAGGA,J.) BAGGA,J.) BAGGA,J.)