IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11370 of 2011 Date of decision: 05.07.2011 Smt. Roshni ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Ms. Sharmila Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly stated that civil suits filed by both the parties involving question of title and possession are pending before the competent Civil Court, therefore, present petition be disposed of with the direction that parties shall abide by the ultimate decision in the civil suits and revenue authorities shall correct the entries as per judgment passed in the pending civil suits. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is totally justified and legal. Therefore, present petition is disposed of with the direction that parties shall abide by the ultimate decision in the pending civil suits between the parties and necessary correction shall be carried out in the revenue record as per the judgment passed in the pending civil suits. While deciding the civil suits, learned Civil Court or Appellate Court shall not be influenced from the impugned entries. (Alok Singh) Judge July 05, 2011 R.S.