c^~^ ^ !»• IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ) N0. ^° ^ . WRIT PETITION (S) N0. /2010 PETITIONER .'° .. ".-•••^- ^•^^" ^'^y::yv \>..-y ,..--".^-^0.-1-" ^""^" ..-/"' y^^ .-••" -ia*"'- R^SPONDENTS ^1 Smt. Sanjana Raj, W/o. Shri Anish Raj, Aged about 40 years, Occupation- Service, Assistant Grade-II in the Office of Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Develop- ment, Durg (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Schedule Caste 85 Schedule Tribe Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) The Coramissioner/ Director, T.R.I. Tribal Development, Raipur (C.G.). The Assistant Coinmissioner, Tribal Development Durg, District Durg (C.G.). The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development Raipur, District Raipur (C.G). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ffiOH Q3URT OZCHHATriSGARH AT BLLA8PUR PETmONER WRIT PETmON (S) No. 7023 of2010 Smt. Sanjaaa. Raj. VERSU8 8ESPONDENTS State ofChhattisgaih & Others. 2-/Z-^- WRIT PEmiQN UNDER ARriCLE 226 Cy TMi CONSTnxjlK)N CP BMDIA SB: Hon'ble Sltri Satfah K. Aenlbutri, J. Present: Shri Atam»(jttuA, Advocate forthe petitiona Sfari Shashank Thakur, Paael Lawyerfortiie ORUEft (ORAL) (Passed oa 29ttl day ofJune, 2011) LA. No. 2. Tliis is an applicrtion tbr witlMirawal ofthe writ petition, onAe groiuids stated therejn. Leained counsel appearing for ofher side has no objedioa. It is ordered accor^ngiy. Conseqiiently, the writ petition is dimni^ed as wiflidrawn. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge . Amit