IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4231 of 2008 AMRESH KUMAR, S/O SRI RAMASHRAYA YADAV, R/O VILLAGE AND P.O.-PATELIYA, P.S.-BIBHUTIPUR, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. ……………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SAMASTIPUR. 2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SAMASTIPUR. 3. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SAMASTIPUR. 4. BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, BIBHUTIPUR, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. 5. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BIBHUTIPUR, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. 6. SANJAY KUMAR, S/O LATE SATYANARAIN MAHTO, R/O VILLAGE AND P.O.-PATELIYA, P.S.- BIBHUTIPUR, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. 7. MUKHIYA, PATELIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. 8. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PATELIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. 9. SUKH SUVIDHA SAMITI THROUGH MUKHIYA, PATELIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. ……………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3 07.07.2011 Petitioner is aggrieved by the appointment of respondent no.6 as Shiksha Mitra. From Annexure-5 series, it appears that the petitioner has been making complaint against non-consideration of his case inspite of having higher marks than the respondent no.6. In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file his complaint/appeal before the concerned statutory Appellate Authority 2 constituted under the Rules. If he does so within one month, the Appellate Authority shall issue notice to respondent no.6 and other necessary parties, hear them and decide the matter preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)