IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 24815 of 2008 Between: Yanamadala Surya Naga Pratyusha D/o. Y. Surya Loknath R/o. 74-31/3-17/2 ,Moulana Street, Kishore Nagar, Penamaluru, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Andhra Pradesh State Council of Higher Education Rep. by its Convener for EAMCET-2008 (Admissions) Sankethika Vidya Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action the respondents in not extending the benefit of sliding through web counseling for admission into Engineering Colleges under EAMCET 2008 for physically handicapped category as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice and violative of article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to admit the petitioner in Civil Engineering course in any Engineering College in Andhra University Area by extending the benefit of sliding through web counseling for physically handicapped category. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.L.V.S.NAGARAJU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.24815 of 2008 Order: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the interim directions given by this Court on 13.11.2008, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 21.09.2008, and pass appropriate orders within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the order, the respondents have passed final orders on 26.11.2008, and in that view of the matter, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is closed giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the orders, dated 26.11.2008, if he so chooses. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 22.01.2009 VGB