1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4007 OF 2010 Maestros Association of Apartment ..Petitioner versus Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Society Pune & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. S. S. Deshmukh for Petitioner. Mrs. Neha Bhide – AGP for Respondent No. 1. CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : JUNE 25, 2010. P.C. : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned AGP for the respondent no. 1. 2. The following facts are not in dispute : That this Court vide order dated 4th March, 2010 passed in writ petition no. 2638 of 2008 in paragraph 3 has observed thus: “3. In view of this statement, with the consent of the petitioner the order at Exh. H dated 31-8-2007, the order at Exh. I dated 17-10-2007, the order at Exh. J dated 15-10-2007 and the order dated 2-12-2007 at Exh. M, the 2 order dated 31st March, 2008 passed in Revision Application No. 387 of 2007 Exh. O are set aside, with liberty to the Respondent No. 2 to make fresh applications claiming same reliefs before the appropriate authorities. In case such applications are made, the Respondent No. 1 i.e. the Deputy Registrar shall pass orders thereon in accordance with law after granting an opportunity of being heard to every person who is likely to be affected by the orders as expeditiously as possible.” It is also not in dispute that in view of the said order, the respondent no. 2 filed a fresh application before the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Pune, and on the basis thereof the notice is issued to the petitioner calling upon to submit its explanation. 3. In view of the above referred undisputed facts, we are not inclined to show indulgence in respect of the proceedings initiated by the Deputy Registrar, at this stage. However, it is open for the petitioner to submit its proper explanation to the said notice. With these observations, writ petition is disposed of. (D. D. SINHA, J.) (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)