bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.154 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4112 OF 2009 Jawahar Hiralal Naik ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.S.R.Borulkar i/b. Mr.Manoj A.Patil for petitioner. Mr.V.S.Masurkar, GP for respondent – State. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & A.A.SAYED,JJ. DATE : 9TH DECEMBER,2009 (At 2.40 in Chamber) P.C. 1. Heard. Perused Review Petition. 2. The petitioner is seeking the review of order dated 10th September, 2009, whereby and whereunder, the above petition was dismissed in limine on the ground of latches and un-explained delay in moving the petition. The cause of action arose in the year 2001 whereas, the petition was filed in the year 2009 without explaining delay. 3. By this Review Petition, the petitioner is trying to explain the delay to seek review of the order dated 10th September, 2009. On being asked, learned Counsel for the petitioner concedes that the subsequent explanation explaining the delay cannot be a ground for Review. On his own submission, the Review Petition is liable to be dismissed. Order accordingly. (A.A.SAYED,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)