Civil Revision No. 2774 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2774 of 2008 Date of decision : 19.2.2010 The Punjab State Cooperative Supply & Marketing Federation ltd. ....Petitioner Versus M/s Satyam Electronics and anr. ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Karmender Singh, Advocate for the petitioner S. D. ANAND, J. The learned Rent Controller ordered dismissal of the petition in terms of Order 9 Rule 8 C.P.C. on account of non- furnishing of correct address of the respondent, inspite of the grant of 6/7 adjournments for the purpose aforementioned. Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, states that the respondent concern is functioning at that very address. In support thereof, learned counsel invites attention of this Court to the fact that the respondent itself had furnished that address in the course of the litigation under reference. Learned counsel states that a verbal presentation to that effect had been made before the learned Rent Controller which did not take cognizance thereof. The learned counsel, however, concedes that the no documented presentation in the context came to be made before the learned Rent Controller. A verbal presentation of the indicated category is foreign Civil Revision No. 2774 of 2008 -2- to the system of dispensation of justice in India. If the petitioner herein felt that the report recorded by the Process Server was incorrect, it ought to have made a presentation to that effect in writing. Whether oral presentation was, infact, not made or whether it was indeed made but not noticed by the learned Rent Controller is not relevant for the moment. The essential idea underlying the system of dispensation of justice is that adjudication of a cause must come about on merits thereof and the Court must endeavour effecting of service upon the parties to the cause. In the light of foregoing discussion, the petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner herein shall appear before the learned Trial Court on 15.3.2010 and make a written presentation of facts in the context of the report recorded by the Process Server. The learned Trial Court shall notice the documented presentation and grant whatever further orders are deemed appropriate in accordance with law. Disposed of accordingly. February 19, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE