^?/^^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTCSGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (5} N0.^^3./2010 PETITIONER y ?-^ .^y^^ v^" '^'yi-\^>-7" ^ '^>'' ^"-~ f ^ ^^':...•"•"" '^•••" RESPONDENTS •^^ \' ^" Daneshwar Kumar Verma, Son of late Basant Kumar Verma, aged about 30 years, working as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, Govt. Primary School, Teligundara, R/o. Village Pandar. Tahsil Patan, District Durg (C.G.), VERSUS 1. ' The Stateof Chhattisgarh, Through -the Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (.C.G.) 2. The Secretary, School Education Department,Mantralaya, b.K.S. Bhawan/^wg (C.G.). ^ /^r 3. District Education Officer, Durg, bistrict burg (C.G.) ^" 4. The Collector, Durg, District Durg (C.6.) ^ 5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Patan, District - Durg (C.G.), WRIT PFTCTCON UNbER ARTECLE 226 OF THE miJN^TCTUTCON OF INDIA. ^-78 ^rr^t^ ^jch ^T8ff •STT^fT »t*-lW WHdT »)*ll<sb ^ST *<)i<ii<n^ ^tfl<Hq<o, [stdt<ylj,< .^....Mf.6').^..-....te^.lfe- ^.....ir..y......^..-.-.;....-..^.7:..Y..^^Q ^ri^t}X^ (^rfgp^) y^HW(rf^^TT^ SB ; Hon'bie Shri Manindra Fvlohah Shrivastava. J. s^rvlce OS=Q8'2Q1Q Shri R.S. Patei, counsei for the Ms. Smita Ghai, Panei Lc Heard. The petitioner has fiied this peti) Extension Officer, who died whiie in compassionate appointment and he Shiksha Kanrii, Grade-iii. The petition^r as Assistant Teacher accordlng to the Learned State counsei submlttN given an opportunity of fiiing the d^t respondent authority, 'which may be 4 with law. Having considered and vvithou1| case, in the opinion ofthis Court, ends| to the petitioner to make a detaiSed r^pr competent respondent authority aion^ vvithin slx w'eeks from today, and on respondent authority shaii decide the as eariy as possibie preferably within a| j of the representstion. if sny grievan^e remedyavaiiable underthe ia'vv. With the aforesaid observation,| Certilled copy as per ruies. betitsoner. Bwyer f{)r the State. <^i€(ki€d»i'wi^if ^* f^si' <r3i^i< ^3tRW3ff^?T tion on the ground that he is a ward of Viilage ;. The petitioner moved an appiication for (ias been glven appojntment on the post of i^r submitted that he is entitied to be appointed l/ojicy. that for th^ present, the petitioner may be i^taited representation before the competent ^onsidered on its own merits, In accordance expressing any opinion cn the merits of the lofjustjcewiii be served, if a djrection is given •^presentation raising nis grievance before the with a copy of the petition and this order, representation being fiied, the competent slame on its own merits in accordance vvitih iaw I period' offour months from the date of recelpt i4e stiiE remains, the petitioner may svaii the "^jp S|jch the this petition stands dlsposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge J-