IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1451 of 2007 (S/S) Smt. Savita Rastogi. .……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. .………. Respondents. Mr. S.K. Mandal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Ms. Beena Pandey, Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. / respondent Nos. 3, 4 & 5. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. BARIN GHOSH, C. J. (Oral) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, petitioner has been relieved by the State of Uttarakhand for which purpose the petitioner had approached this Court by filing the present writ petition. 2. In such view of the matter, the writ petition stands disposed of, inasmuch as, the grievances of the petitioner have been met. (V.K. Bist, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C. J.) 03.01.2011 03.01.2011 G