IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.21643 of 2010 Sohan Lal & others Vs. State of Haryana & others Present: Mr.Raman B. Garg, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking writ of mandamus directing the respondents to re-evaluate 5th paper (Local Rules & Public Works Account Code) of State Subordinate Accounts Services Examination (State S.A.S.Examination), Part 1 held in May, 2010. Further prayer is for awarding 20 marks each for first two questions relating to Practical ignoring errors because of wrong figures and two marks for each of sub part of questions relating to theory to the extent of 25 sub parts correctly attempted by the petitioners as per its Syllabus (Annexure P-1) and Criteria (Annexure P-2). Prayer further is for tracing out missing loose sheets of petitioner Nos.6 and 13 and to add its marks in their results. What has been prayed for in the writ petition is certainly much beyond the jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The question relating to the same examination was raised in CWP No.15781 of 2010, decided by this court on 22.9.2010. By making reference to various authoritative pronouncements of the Hon'ble Supreme Court concerning the re- evaluation and the scope of jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 in such like matters, the said writ petition was dismissed. In view of the decision noted above, no case for interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is made out. Dismissed. December 07, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE