mwHE HIGH coURT OF CHHA'mSGARH AT BxmswR I Writ Petition NOS éé {2&05 PE§TIT10NERS M1”, S. K, Malewar sge Late Shri G. N. 4i Malewaxy aged about 41 yeara, _} ua SEL'Raiay, Rjo ‘ Grd W Daafikhurd , Bila$pur (- .G .) . amesh Kum Si o La Shri R ar w Ramahandra Yadav, ‘aged abau 4 yars, uard, S.E&R&i1way, R] o New Loco Colony, Bilaspr (Ca). B. K. gre lo Lam ri Chaitra angre, aged about 49 yaaw, Guard .E‘Railwa, R1 o R.T.S. Cony, Bilaspur (.G.) D. Si amaiah $3! 0 Shri D, Ne u w R; d, (CG R ar R! on Dallrajhafa, Dimrid: Durg (C.Cr.). 3. Moryaui Sl Late Shri Gr. i) Nan ? y ‘t 1 e G u fj De S $h m D S¢y ol C. ta‘ R , eliah, aged abot 56 years; Guard, S‘EéaRailay} 0 Railway Colony, Bhilai Marshalling Yar Bhilai ..). P. K. Ray 3f orSlli‘i M. D. ay, agal abéut 46 yeaw, Gud, S.E.C. Railway, o RailWay Coly i .D.Moryi, agecl about 5’ ear, Guard, S.E9Rai1way. Rf o Deepak Niwas, Katoratalab, Raipur {so. i C 1 } X M V5 R Raju Sfo Late Shn M Rama RaJu aged about 4° yeals, Guard, SXEF‘Rallway, Rf g Lam Calony, Raipur (QGJ. RESPONDENTS -Versus—. Union of India, Through the General Manager, Sauth Eastern Railway, Garden Reanh, Calcutta — 43. The Divisional Railway Manager, 53011111 Ea$ter1$'Rai1Way, Bilmpur (C.G.). The Senior Divisional Personnel OEoer, S.E.C. Railway, Raipur L The Ge11eral "Manager, South Eaot Central Railway, Headquarterg Oooo, Personnel Department, Bilaiipur (C.G.). The Senior Divisional Fersonnel OEooi‘g SEE. Railway, Bilaapur {C.G.). The Central Adminiotrative, Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench, Jabalpur through itss Registrar, CAT, Jaballaur (MR). 7(C.G.). “TRIT ' PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA FOR IS‘WLANCE OF A W'RIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS‘“ PROHIBITION CERTIORARI ETC OR :RNY OTHER DIEECTION OR ORDER TO DO JTJ%TICE {N THE MATTER /?. / Details of the petition. XI—HC—22 HWWM Wffé€©fA Division Bench:- Hon’ble Shri A.K.Patnaik CJ : Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra 04-04-2005 Shri G.S.Ahluwalia, iearne Shri Vinay Harit, ieam indialrespondents. The petitianers are work Railway. When they were prom they were given a salary which w post. Being aggrieved, they iii Central Administrative Tribunal, J Tribunal disposed ofthe Original will me a detailed representatio Raihmay, Garden Reach, Calcutta S.E.R., shall consider and dispo wo months from the date of re speaking, detailed and conside 2on4 of the Tribunal, the petition said representation has been G9.11.2004. Being aggrieved b have med a writ petition‘under Art ln LCharrdra Kumar VstUm'on of India and others, the Constitution Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme counsel for the petitioners. d Sr. Standing counsel for the Union of ng as Guards in the South Eastern Central ted to the p'ost of Guard trom the lower post, s less than what they were getting in the lower d Original Application Nor 8221999 before balpur. By the order dated 20‘“ April 2004, the plication with the direction that the petitioners before the General Manager, South Eastern through proper channel and General Manager, e of the said representation within a period of eipt of the said representation by passing a order. Pursuant to the order dated 20‘“ April rs liled a representation before GM. and the sposed of by the GM. Vide order dated the said order dt. 09.11.20G4, the petitioners ole 226/227-of Constitution of lndia. Court has held that the jurisdiction conferred upon the High Courts under Articles 226327 against the order passed by the A? wisdom t r 8 Mi ' p i XI—HC—22 @ mmmm QX w fyég/o @ r