IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9930 of 2011 Sarwar Sajeev @ Sibu Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 04. 14.09.2011 The petitioner being the husband is facing the prosecution in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of assault and kicking out from the matrimonial house. The petitioner and opposite party no.2 are present. The opposite party no.2 claims the marriage with the petitioner being performed in the year 1974 and out of wedlock there is a son and two daughters. All the children are staying with the opposite party no.2. The petitioner denies the marriage. The petitioner is also not ready to make payment of any maintenance amount. In the circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner surrender before the learned court below and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks in connection with Compliant Case No. 224C of 2010 pending in the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria. 2 Let the learned court below consider the regular bail of the petitioner without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. With the above observation, this application is dismissed. Amrendra/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)