1 CRA 822/2009 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 822 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. A.S. Khandeparkar i/b Khandeparkar & Associates for the applicants. Mr. G.V. Nagarsheth for respondent nos.1 to 5. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 19TH JANUARY 2011 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this revision application, the applicants challenge the judgment and order dated 18th August 2008 passed by the District Judge-II, Palghar, dismissing the appeal of the revision applicants against the decree for eviction. 3. The revision applicants are the tenants 2 CRA 822/2009 and the respondents are the landlords. A decree for possession was passed against the revision applicants on the ground of bonafide requirement and default in payment of rent. So far as the default in payment of rent is concerned, admittedly the notice of demand was served on the applicants and admittedly they did not pay the rent within the statutory period. The two courts below also recorded the concurrent finding of fact about the bonafide requirement of the respondents and the said finding is a possible finding of fact which requires no interference in exercise of revisional jurisdiction. The revision application is rejected summarily. 4. Request of the learned counsel for the applicants for continuation of the interim relief is rejected. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)