@5957? C?) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (S) No. €020 OF 2011. PETITIONERS /:1. Paras Ram Sinha, S/o. late Shri Heera Lal Sinha, aged about 56 years, Head Master, Navin Primary School Anusuchit Jati Para Jalampur, Block Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) ' Mannulal Sahu, S/o. Ram Gulal Sahu, aged about 55 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Semradih, Block Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C. G.) Shanti lal Sahu, S/o. Shri Sunhar Ram Sahu, aged about 52 years, Head Master, Govt; Primary School Navinchhati, Block Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS @? RESPONDENTS /:1. State of Chhattisgar'h, Through : The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) District Education Officer, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, (C. G.) h WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA “A W HIGH COURT OF CHHATTaESGARH AT BILASPUR MW $3 : HON’BLE MR. JUSTKCE PRM‘INKER DIWAKER W.P.§S[.NO. 50201 201 1 PETITIGNERS Pal'as Rem Sinha & Gihcx's Vfim US} RESPONDENTS State: of c. G. & Another Shri Somkant Vmma, counsel for tbs patiticmam, Shri‘Yashwant S‘mgh Thakm, Dy. AG. for the: Stats. WRITMW PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (30.08.20 1 1} Gn'evzmca of thc peritioxmm in the present psiition is that tha petitioners were appaintad as Daputy Téachers on a fixed pay seals of Rs. 100 for a pariod of Two yams and :ifrer completion of probation, they wem grantsd regumr pay scale of Rs. 169—800. ()omiantjon of the counsel for the petitioners is that they am entitled for regular pay scale with (:Eect. from the dam of initial app0intmant and his case is squarcly cavered with number of dacisions passed by this Court and also tbs judgment rendered by the M.P. State Administrative Tn'bunal, Jabalpur in O.A. .N0. 2745/89 Madhukant Yadu & 56 Others Vs. $tate af MP. & Others) Whers in it has besn hald that similarly placed. maclmrs am antifled for mgular pay scale fi'om the. date of fhc’ir initial appointment It is not disputed by both th€ yarties that. tha mattar was faken up by th€ Siam to tha Apex Court but the appeal was alSo (lisamissed by tha Apex C(iurt upholding the (lacision of thc Tribunal to thf: el‘fact that the. Teachers/ Assisfaxit Teachars are. entitled fbr mgular pay scale. from tho date of their initial appointment. in View 0f the above submission made. by the couneel for the parties, the petition ie disposed of in the same tenns 1'.e. the 1W petitionms are granted liberty to make a representation, if so advised, in flue light of the aforesaid judgment and the circular dated 5, 1 .2011 (Annexure P/S) and in tmn, the concemed respondent is directed to consider their case on its own merits and in its perspective. If the petitioner stands on the same footing as per cider passed by The State Administrative Tribunal in Madhukant Vadu (supra) and subsequently confirmed by the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) NO. 6892/98 by order dated 03.01.95, the petitioner may be entitled to same relief accordingly. It is Expectecl mm the State authon'ties to pass suitahle order after due scrutiny of the facts. it iS made. clear that this court has not expressed any opmion on the merits of the case and the. authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law. Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge