IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22868 of 2010 PRAMOD YADAV @ KARI YADAV Son of late Biranchi Yadav, R/O/V- Parwaha, P.S.-Gamhariya, Dist.-Madhepura Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.35055 of 2010 RAMOD YADAV @ PRAMOD KUMAR YADAV, son of Mishri Lal Yadav, resident of village-Kajha, P.S.-Supaul, Dist.-Supaul Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 2.2.2011. As both the aforesaid petitions arise out of one first information report, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Both the petitioners, who are in custody in connection with S. Tr. No. 109 of 2010 arising out of Supaul P.S. Case No. 352 of 2009 for the offences under section 413 and 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code, have prayed for grant of bail. Earlier antecedent report of petitioner, Pramod Yadav @ Kari Yadav was called for which has been received and is kept at Flag-A. On perusal of the antecedent report it transpires that the petitioner is an accused in altogether eight cases. Most of the cases are relating to either for the offence under Section 392 or Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. So far as petitioner, Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar Yadav in Cr. Misc. No. 35055 of 2010 is concerned, it appears that he was not having any criminal antecedent. It was submitted by Arun Kumar Jha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 35055 of 2010, that petitioner’s name has surfaced on the confession of co- 2 accused Pramod @ Babloo, who has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 26.11.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35529 of 2010. Accordingly, let the petitioner, Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar Yadav (Cr. Misc. No. 35055 of 2010) be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-III, Supaul in connection with S. Tr. No. 109 of 2010 arising out of Supaul P.S. Case No. 352 of 2009. So far as petitioner, Pramod Yadav @ Kari Yadav (Cr. Misc. No. 22868 of 2010) is concerned, keeping in view the criminal antecedent of the petitioner as well as the fact that the case has already been committed to the court of Sessions, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner, Pramod Yadav @ Kari Yadav stands rejected. It is expected that keeping in view the period of custody, the court below will take all steps so that the case may come to its logical end without any delay. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)