^iSaLiduaB* HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2359 of 2005 i' ^s» Respondents 4. 5. Versus 1. IIWM^ Petitioners 1. Harihar Sahu, (Staff No. 87328), son of Late Shyaatiswar Sah.u, aged 54 years, Accounts Officer, 4th Ploor, Auto-Exchange Biuldmg, G.E. Road, Raipur(C.G-) 2. Ajit Kumar Datta (Staff No. 87638), son of Late Gopiaafh Datta, agd 54 years, Accounts Officer, Ruabaoidha Telcom Quarter, Bhibi, Distnct Durg (C.G.) 3. Subhash Chandra Goldar (StafiF No.88590), SOD. of Late R. K. GoMar, Accounts Officer, J- 1, Shatabdi Nagar, TeUbaadha, Raipur (C.G.) Anil Kumar Menon (Staff No. 88011), son of Late R. Rauiaa Menon, aged 40 years, Accounts Officer, 12B, Street-IX, Sector V Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) S. Ramesh (Staff No. 88031), son of T.S.Sankaran, aged 43 years, Qtr. 2, Telephone Staff Quarters, Tatibaadh Exchaage BuUdiag, Raipur (C,G.) Union of India, fhraiigh Secretary, Department ofTelecommunications, Saachar Bhavaa, 20, Ashoka Road, mew Delhi - 110 001. 2. The Chau-maa and Maxiagmg Dinector, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Liaiited, Statesman House, Barakhamba Road, New DeUii - 110 001. 3. The Dircptor (SU-1), Department of Telecommuiiications, Mmisfay of Commimication aad Information Technology, Sanchar Bhawan, New Dellii - 110 001. 4, The Assistaat Director Generai, (SEA) Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., 201-B, Statesman House Barakhiamba Road, New Delhi -110 001. 5, The Chief General Manager, BIiarat Saachar Nigam Ltd. C.G. Circle Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 6, The Chief Accouuts Officer, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., C.G.Circle Raipur (Chhattisgarh). (Writ Petition under Article 226f 227 ofthe Constitution ofladia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotri J.) Shri S. S. Rajput, Advocate for fhe petitioners. 1. 2. Thakur ORDBR ( Passed oa this 15th Day ofApril, 2009) Leamed coiuisel appearuig for fhe petitioners, on iastructioiis, submits that fhe petifloners seek permission of tiiis Court to withdraw this petition with Uberty to take recoiirse to any ofher forum that may be available to them under provisions oflaw. In view of fhe foregoing, fhis petition is dismissed as wifhdraiwn wifh fhe above-stated liberty. ^—____ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge