IN THE HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCG) WRIT PETITION N0.4-66_3 /2005 PETITIONER M/ y^/ y J^w^ ~.*^w ^y?y <ly^ <^ RESPONDENTS p-00^ ^^ ^ U,.J ;.;iLiU.i_=»«.- ^ Sitarain Rai, son of Shri Pakir Rai, aged about 60 years, occupation - Assistant Teacher, Adhikshak Balak Ashram Jabgunda, Vikas Khand OrGhha, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS /•l. TheStateofChhattisgarh,. through ; Its Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Cpllector, Distt. Basfar (CKhattisgarh) The Block Education Officer, Block - Abujhamar, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) ^4. • Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Abujhamar Orchha, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) ^5. Gajendra Nag, Shiksha Karmi Warg III, Primary Schpol' "^?akeli, i Janpad Panehayat - Orchha (Abujhamar ) Distt. Bastar (Chhattisgarh) ^ ^- 04 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, *linc»ia>'TTq» \»wi-qioicw, yTilWld; RriI'Hy^ ^. f. ^30· ^ C, .b.3 2; 3ii^?i «Rpp(^pfg^s) Wl200^ aii^sTiisTR-fi* n'^sn^CTaiqw ap 17.10.2005 Shri A.N.Bhakta, coyn^el Shri Pankaj Shrivastav^, I.A.No.8381/2005 beten This is an application Bisard. This application stand; W.P.No.4669/2005 The petitioner, who is Assistant Teacher and is al Ashram, Jabgunda, Vikas challenged the postingof re^ Jabgunda videorder dated 1. of the impugned order has The submission of l^ respondent no.5 js posted th< charge of Adhikshakto respo| action of respondent no.Sin the said Balak Ashram is not; In this writ petition, fo( focys-stencff of the petitior) respondent no.5 issued by i| allowed to challenge the or4 authority on technical ground( Learned counsel fortH' petitioner, who Fs holding <RI<ffCTJl'l*<l*inl"^"l5l^l'(lul'{^l'( ^•a)^H3il^»T ^el for the petitioner. i, P.L. for the State on advance copy. irurgent hearing. The matteristaken up on disDosed of. Isresently working on the sybstantive post of ^o holding the charge 'of Adhikshak Balak |Khand Orchha, Distt. Bastar (C.G), has Ipondent No.5 as Adhikshak, Balak Ashram, 1.6.2005 issued byresponctentno.3. Acopy lenfiledasAnnexureP-1. . [arned. counsel for the petitioner is that if |re, the petitioner shall haye to hand-over the ident no.5, Learned counsel submits that the >osting respondent no.5 as Vr\e Adhikshak of in accordance with law, the reliefs of above nature 1 do not flnd the er to challenge the order of ppsting of sspondent no.3. A co-employee cannot be er of posting of another co-employee by an |e petitionercouldnot point out as to howthe su^stantive post of Assistant Teacher, would be '/FS/2005-20,000 iri!:iriFn;i[ir 35E[-<<rairt<(, u'-rflt-i'ld, felni'Hyx -s—.y-^;-^o:-^kJ»-a>_-..-..:.. HI*1eM ^TT^ """"""'"""""'""—^"—'—• sn^sT qa^p(tyij«i<s) z^ ^200^ an^siwR'ii* cr./'gn^CTiTOro ^ s'RiTSR^iftcran^T adversely affected by the im am not inclined to entertain s The petition has no mi CQnsequently, M.W .f i|3ugnedorder passed by respondent no.3. ipch petition filed bythe petitioner. ^rit and the same is dismissed. l.No3786/2005 stands disposed of. <BIo[c»<i1l*11*)«Y<t"|s'<3'<Kllt<;l'< ^3ri^Ha?i^?r Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge SP/FS/2005-20,000 ^....^^.•s' ^y-^0 ¥¥€f^ ltiil]'1!tll""rflTI"'n^--'p;"sl