c^ Ao +- 0> IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION N0. 1 716 OF 2004 PETITIONER t...^ I.M.E. University of Technology, Raipur, A Private University established, incorporated and notified under Chhattisgarh Nizi Kshetra Vishwa Vidyalaya (Sthapana ^ .^.w Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 2002, / ^L-.~? • ''^ ^\ rm ^ ^0< '^ , ^^ ^ >y's"'^ >"•'. ^^^ its Authorised Signatory Sliri Vinod Gupta, S/0 Shri L.D. Gupta, Aged about 49 years, F-1, Anupam Nagar, Raipur (C.G.). A»-^ RESPONDENTS: / ^'" v,v.-'1.- .«| - Versus - State ofChhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Department ofHigher Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). Regulatory Commission, Constituted- under the Chhattisgarh Nizi Kshetra Vishwa Vidyalaya (Sthapana Aur Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 2002 (No.2 of 2002), C/o Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan,Raipur (C.G.). University Grants Commission, Through: Its Chainnan, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi. All India Council of Technical Education, Indira Gandhi Sports Complex, I.P. Estate, New Delhi- 110002. Medical Council oflndia, Through: Its Secretary, Aiwan-E-Galib Marg, Opp. Mata Sundari College for Women, New Delhi - 110 002. 004 f ...^"1 6. Pharmacy Council of India, Combined Coimcils Building, Kotla Road, Aiwan-Galib Marg, P.0. Box No.7020, New Delhi - 110 002. 7. National Council of Teachers Education, Indira Gandhi Indoor Stadium, I.P. Estate, New Delhi- 110002. 8. Nursing Council of India, Kotla Road, Temple Lane, New Delhi-110002. 9. Bar Council of India, 21, Institutional Area, Rouse Avenue, NewDelhi-110002. 10. Distance Education Council, Through: Its Director, DEC Building, IGNOU Campus, Maidan Garhi, NewDdhi-110068. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 / 227 OF THE C^NSTITUTION OF INDIA .L. XI-HC-22 3TI^T^T (q^ichW^T ^ir^^rfN' Anjaiii '^7 ^ 3^T ^jMKrt^, ^Tfl^^Ko, Rt^tKiy 3TT^T ^f^^h 079 ^ll^<<11 »>^ich ^.V!:.{..^.13:j.^ 200 3TI^T^<iT^K^Tf?cT aBs HON'BLE SHRI JVSTICE A.K.PATNAIK, C.J & HON'BLE SHRI DILIP RAOSAH6B DESHaiUKH. J 23.09.2005 None appears for the pe| Mr. Ravindra Agrawal, Chhattisgarh. Mr. Agrawal states tha| had challenged the Vishwavids^alaya (Sthpana Au| 2004 by which the Chhattij (Sthpana Aur Viniyaman) judgment of Supreme Court ii| v. St.ate of Chhattisgarh an^ provisipns III 420$ the provisions of Vishwavidyalaya (Sthapana) have been declared to be therefore this writ petition ha$ After considering the Agrawal, we find that this ^| and we accordingly dispose Sd/- Chief Justice ct)i^?<n4i'i ^H<nT ^' te^ <F3i^a< ^3Tf^T3T}^T itioner(s). P.L. has appeared for the State of jt in this writ petition the petitioner of Chhattisgarh Niji Ksh^ra Viniyaman) Sansodhan Adhiniyam, ^garh Niji Kshetra ViBhwavidyal^ Ad^iniyam^ 2002 was amended, B^a the case of Prof. Yashpal and athers another reported in 2005 (5) SCC;. the Chhattisgarh Nyi Kshefra Aur Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 20CT2 illtra vires of the ConstitutiQn, and become iiifructuous, ^ubmission made by Mr, Ra\dndra 4t petition has become infructuous oflthe same._ Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge (^^f^)