IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL C-482 No. 637 of 2010 Suresh Kumar Verma and others ……..Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand and another ….Respondents. Present: Mr. Mohd., Advocate for the applicants. Mr. Nanda Arya, AGA for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent no.1. Mr. S. K. Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent no.2. Date of Decision: 28.08.2010 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J(Oral) Heard Mr. Mohd. Azim, Advocate for the applicants, Mr. Nandan Arya, AGA for state of Uttarakhand/respondent no.1 and Mr. S. K. Chaudhary, advocate for respondent no.2. This Criminal Misc. application under Section C-482 has been filed challenging the charge-sheet and the subsequent summoning order dated 10.2.2010 issued to the applicants in Criminal Case No. 386 of 2010 State Vs. Lalit Kumar Varma and others by the court below. As per the charge-sheet an offence is said to have been committed by the present applicants under Sections 498-A, 323 of IPC read with Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Brief facts of the case are that an F.I.R. was filed against the present applicants under Sections 498-A, 323 of IPC read with Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Admittedly, the present applicants are father, mother and brother (applicant nos. 1, 2 and 3 respectively) of Lalit Kumar, who is husband of the complainant and the principal accused in the matter. Admittedly, they reside in the same house in which the complainant resides along with her husband. The allegations as per the FIR prima facie seem make out a case against the present applicants. Consequently, the charge-sheet and the subsequent summoning order dated 10.2.2010 was issued against the applicants by the court below. In another case (C-482 No. 359 of 2010) on behalf of the uncles of the husband (who is the main accused) and who reside in a different house stood allowed by this Court today itself i.e. on 28.8.2010. However, the nature of evidence against them is entirely different and the reason for interference in this case was established. No such case is made out against in favour of the present applicants. This Court finds no good ground to interfere in the impugned orders passed by the court below. This is for the trial court to examine the matter on its merit. This is not for this Court to examine the matter under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The present C-482 application is absolutely without merit and is liable to dismissed and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the court concerned for necessary compliance. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J) 28.08.2010 Kuldeep