1 CP NO.329/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 329 OF 2011 ,In WP/11135/2010 BHAGWAN KONDIBA BANGAR ...PETITIONER VERSUS PATILBUWA YESHWANTA BANGAR DECEASED AND ORS ...RESPONDENTS ... Mr. Mundhe Shrimant S ., Adv., for the petitioner. Mr.V.H.Dighe, AGP for Respondent State. Mr. A.N.Nagargoje, Adv. for R.Nos. 5, 8 to 11. ... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. Dated: November 22, 2011 ... PER COURT :- 1. Heard learned Counsel for the Contempt petitioner and learned Counsel for the respondent. 2. A confusion is sought to be raised by the parties, litigating in respect of order dated 31st Jan.,2011 (Page No.159) which reads as under: “1. Heard. Rule. 2. Hearing expedited. 3. Parties to maintain status quo as on today.“ 2 CP NO.329/2011 3. Mr. Nagargoje, learned Counsel for the respondent informs, the order of status quo, in all material particulars, will have to be read in the context of prayers in the writ petition and, particularly, prayer clauses B and C of the writ petition. He reiterates that the status quo referred on 31st of Jan.,2011, will be revolving and restricting to prayer clauses B and C and the respondent does not mean that the status quo deals with possession of the parties litigating. 4. Accepting the above position, since there is already a civil suit being RCS No. 177/2011 before the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Patoda, both the parties are at liberty to dwell upon and agitate their respective claims and contentions. I do not see any action to be taken against the respondents. Notices, if issued, are discharged. Contempt Petition disposed of. ( K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. ) ... agp/329-11cp