1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.65 OF 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr.S.A.Dhengale, learned counsel for applicants. (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 30/04/2010 Heard learned counsel for applicant. By the present civil revision application, the applicants have assailed the order dated 20/07/1998 at Exh.28 passed in M.C.A.No. 19/1996, in RCA No.343/1994. As this is a revision, the Court require to consider whether there is any apparent error or perversity in the order impugned at the hands of concerned. After perusal of the order passed below Exh.28, it appears that no steps were taken by the applicants herein, who are also appellants before the Courts below to complete the service on the proposed legal heirs of respondent no.3 for 2 years. Even 2 though the order was passed to complete the service on the legal heirs of the deceased respondent by paper publication, and an order was passed at Exh.51 on 18/12/1997 to deposit the publication charges, but for considerable period, these charges were not deposited, hence the application was rejected vide impugned order. After going through the order, this Court did not see any perversity in the orders passed, or any apparent error of law in the order passed at the hands of courts below. The revision applications sans any merit, hence rejected. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/APRIL 2010/cra65-06