-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6641 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2665 OF 2004 Vijay Vasant Dhavale ..Applicant Vs. M/s.Beena Enterprises & Ors...Respondents ... Mr.G.B.Bhatt Advocate for Applicant Mr.J.A.Udaipur for Respondent No.1 Mr.R.S.Khadapkar A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : OCTOBER 10, 2005 DATE : OCTOBER 10, 2005 DATE : OCTOBER 10, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned advocate for the respondent-original complainant. 2. By order dated 12.4.2005, this Court rejected the application of the applicant for quashing of process and directed the trial Court to decide the case within a period of six months. In the said case, witnesses have been examined and -2- cross-examined, the statement of the accused under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. has been recorded, defence witness has also been examined and the matter is kept for arguments today. Now the applicant who is the original accused in the said case is seeking extension of the period to complete the trial by a further period of six months. No good ground is made out for extension of time. Hence, this application is rejected. [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]