IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42185 of 2010 SUNIL KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 31.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Hindrance raised by Mukhiya was reported by filing a first information report in course of investigation that was corroborated by witnesses also but later some witnesses appeared about incorrect preparation of muster roll without any substance and petitioner is apprehending his arrest which never can be justified. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Narhat (Sitamarhi) P.S. Case No. 143 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Safik ( Mandhata Singh, J.)