IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29029 of 2010 MADHU ROY @ RAM AWADHESH SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10. 08. 2010. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bihta P.S. case No. 43 of 2010, registered under Section 384 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged that ransom was demanded for which indiscriminate firing was made, though, no injury was caused to the informant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has no criminal antecedent, but he has been implicated in this case only because he is co-villager of the informant. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence prayer for bail is rejected. However, learned court below may consider regular bail application considering the fact that there is no criminal antecedent of the petitioner and there is general allegation of firing in which no injury has been caused to the informant. m.p. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)