1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.(MD).No.8085 of 2011 And M.P.(MD).Nos. 1 & 2 of 2011 T.Kathamuthu ... Petitioner -Vs- 1. The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Pudukottai Region Rep. by its General Manager Pudukottai 2. The Branch Manager Pudukottai Town Branch of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Pudukottai Region Pudukottai ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the transfer order dated 02.07.2011 passed in Ref: TNSTC/Kumba/PuMa/PaPi1/042/11 by the first respondent, quash the same in so far as transferring the petitioner from Pudukottai branch to Pattukottai branch of the first respondent Corporation and consequently direct the respondents to permit him to continue to work in his original place at the second respondent branch and to treat the period from 14.07.2011 to the date of permitting him to join duty in his original place at the second respondent branch as his duty period and to pay him all benefits including wages. *** For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents: Mr.B.Pugalendhi Special Government Pleader O R D E R No representation for the writ petitioner. 2. The impugned order of transfer dated 02.07.2011 passed by the Management of the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Pudukottai, is inter alia challenged, on the grounds that, though there was no request made by the petitioner, the reason assigned in the impugned order that there was a request made by the writ petitioner is incorrect. The order is challenged on other grounds as well. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. Having regard to the man ground, Mr.B.Pugalendhi, learned Special Government Pleader, was directed to take notice on the respondents and get instructions. 4. On this day, when the matter came up for hearing, on the basis of the instructions from the respondents, Mr.B.Pugalendhi, learned Special Government Pleader, submitted that due to typographical error, the words mutual consent had crept in inadvertently. 5. He submitted that the earlier orders would be withdrawn. He also sought for liberty to issue fresh administrative orders. The submission of the learned counsel for Transport Corporation is placed on record. 6. In as much as, the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Kumbakonam, has come forward seeking permission to withdraw the earlier order, liberty is granted. If the first respondent has power and authority to revise an administrative order, it is always open to him to do so and there need not be any deviation to that effect. In view of the submission of the Corporation, the petitioner shall not be disturbed. 7. With the abovesaid directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (A.S) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (C.S) To 1. The General Manager The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Pudukottai Region, Pudukottai 2. The Branch Manager Pudukottai Town Branch of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Pudukottai Region, Pudukottai + 1 cc to Mr.S.Arunachalam, Advocate, SR No.25084 W.P.(MD).No.8085 of 2011 And M.P.(MD).Nos. 1 & 2 of 2011 26.07.2011 vsg RJ/29.7.11 (IT) 2p/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/