IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY, TWO THOUSAND TEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1783 of 2009 Between: R. Salaiah (died) & others. … Petitioners And Sri S.S.P. Yadav & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri V.Narsimha Goud Counsel for the respondents: Sri C. Sunil Kumar Reddy SC for APSRTC This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1783 of 2009 ORDER:- This contempt case is filed alleging willful disobedience of order dated 21.04.2009 in Writ Petition No.1843 of 2009. At the hearing, Sri C. Sunil Kumar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that in pursuance of the order passed in the writ petition, respondent No.3 has settled the terminal benefits of petitioner No.1. Sri V. Narsimha Goud, learned counsel for the petitioners, while admitting that the terminal benefits were settled, sought to dispute the quantum of the amount paid to the petitioners. Inasmuch as the respondents have complied with the order of this Court by paying certain amount towards terminal benefits, they have duly complied with the order passed in the writ petition. Therefore, I do not find any reason to proceed further against the respondents for the alleged contempt. Liberty is given to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy, if they dispute the quantum of the terminal benefits paid to them by the respondents. Subject to the above observations, the contempt case is dismissed. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 29.01.2010 ES