IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA WRIT PETITION NO : 21161 of 1994 Between: S.Madhuri Devi,, W/o. Appala Naidu, R/o. Chinnamushirivada(V), Pendurthi (M), Visakahapatnam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Visakahapatnam Urban Development Authority, rep.by it's Chairman, Visakahpatnam. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Pendurthi (M),Visakahaptnam District. 3 The R.D.O., Visakhapatnam, (R3 is added as per court direction) ..... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to To issue a Writ or order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents in proposing to lay-down a road without acquiring the land belonging to petitioner in S.No.164/10 of Chinnamushirivada (V), Pendurthi (M),Visakhapatnam District, as illegal and arbitrary. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.V.DHANAMJAYA RAO (not present) Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Ms. Sumalini reddy (SC for VUDA) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3: G.P. for Revenue The Court made the following ORDER: In spite of reasonable opportunities given, even today when the matter came up for hearing, neither the petitioner nor her counsel is present and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. The interim orders, if any, granted by this Court in this writ petition is hereby vacated. _____________ D.S.R. VARMA, J 29th October, 2004 Isn/Krk To 1 The Chairman, Visakahapatnam Urban Development Authority, Visakahpatnam. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Pendurthi (M),Visakahaptnam District. 3 The R.D.O., Visakhapatnam. 4. Two CCs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 5. Two CD copies.