661% IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF‘CHHArrIsGARH AT BILASPUR (c.G.) WRIT PETITION (s.) No. 33W /2009 gmgge ggnch / PETITIONER : Budhu Ram Shori, aged about 44 Years, son of Shri Jugnath Shori, at present working as a Head Master, Primary School, Koschiddi, Block Kondagaon, District Baster (C.G.) VERSUS 1. / State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The RESPONDENT : Secretary, Tribal Welfare Depart- ment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2./ Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jagdalpur, District Baster (C.G.), 3. The Collector, Jagdalpur, District Baster (C.G.), 4. / Block Development Officer, Tribal Welfare Kondagaon, District Baster (C.G.), / 5. Block Development Officer, Triabl Welfare Farasgaon, District Baster (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON$I- TUTION OF INDIA FOR IS§UANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OR MANDAMUSIQERTIORARI,ORDER/O&DERS, DIRECTION/ DIRECTIQNS ETC. WWW HEDN 37 /W2Oj mm (Wu) am mmmw m W Raw W m . . I Emiwi V £§grg¥f1§$ - . ‘ ii W, w !E ~ n " EMEZEQQQ Shri Vishnu KCShta asun$e§ the pe‘ciim‘na. Shri Sumesh Bagaj GA far th {espandent3/State. Chaiiemge m Ems §e€iti0n Ea §he smsr dsa i a0093§a pasgad by :‘espondem M32 by which ha paiéiioner has been €z’ai‘?$‘e¥red i’am Wimary Schem, Déngi’ipara ?aii§ Shack Kendagam i0 §3{imary Schcéi, Gsdma, Bk Farasgaon, an admini$iraiiye Con‘ientiom of the counse fa? ‘L'he petitiener §s éhat tha petitioner is a vicim 0f frequew’i tr n“ L-‘e submita that vade Grder axed 1W 490i ~‘spe518!on of %h petmcner was mvoxed and was given i’he pestmg at Pramari Schoal Pam Dwgripara, Biock Ksiidagagn. herea‘ter vide wider daied 26.2.2069 ha was ’promsieci aid pasted at Prirr§arv 'Schoai, Kamhiddi, Bmck J gKowciaqaon l anii “10w by he impugned 01w? he has agam . ,seen ansfewed Ha submits mat Mfg o; he yetmonsr *3 ai 0 a :govemmem servani am snE as pcatecz at Primary whaoi, Kamagam itsesf Csunse! ior he. rVspcndePtss’Séate sumus *ha: :t is n0. a case b of frequeni traasfer because by the fzrst tamer datad 191 .2 S7 m3 suspe‘aamn arder 9f the pehnener was revmed vineleas e‘y Greer e’é e 2 20m he wee gmen mmeaon. He hewever suemits mat $u ‘ fx r ' ) am&§mmm$ mm'M£@wg3m/Q5wi zoo mm (We) mm afg’er m “Z/ iei ihe petitioner make a suitabie concerned wwch wouid be decidec propas§€§9n of me S%ate counseL c his agreemam. However, he prays represemaéien 0f {he petétiener cancemee. Accei’dingw, the peiitmn is d the pe‘ii‘iiener makes a representa‘ W§thin a period of 1D days frem i‘r arder, i’ne auiherities corsoemed x ‘ v i i t spesed 0f wtth a direction Lita it 10a to the aurheriries cencemed e dare 0f receipt 0f cepy er this 'haii decia‘e the same wrihm a furmey period 0f rhree weeks frorm e dare er‘ ire receiet. Er is made c%ear iha‘: t'ms Com as mi commemed on the Merirs cf h - »:-r O r1 accordance with !aw. represeniarion of the petitioner sirictiy § é I ! r i ,r r tese am‘ the authorrties c0r§cernee§ are free to deciée theM Sci/- Pritinker Eiwaker Judge Warwwewmrr *aa‘msrréw representaticn t0 the autherttiee i in accorcrance with iaw. Tc this ounser for éhe peté’réoner showed . for an tnterim pretection tit} the és decided try the authcririee