IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 68 of 2005 (S/B) Dr. N.C. Tiwari & others. .……… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. .………. Respondents. Mr. B.N. Molakhi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.K. Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. B.D. Pande, Advocate for respondent No. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states, that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous, and as such, the same may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents state, that they have no objection to the disposal of the instant writ petition, in terms of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 20.07.2010 20.07.2010 G