: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.374 OF 2008 Balkrishna Appayya Shetty ..Appellant. Vs. Smt. Surinder Kaur Kartarsingh & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.J.S.Kini i/b.Mr.Suresh Dubey for the Applicant. Mr.R.M. Haridas for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008 DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008 DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : There is no warrant for interfering with the concurrent findings of fact. The evidence clearly establishes that the Applicant occupied the premises only under a leave and licence agreement. The same having come to an end, the Applicant has no right to even remain in the suit premises. 2. Only as a matter of indulgence, the time to vacate is extended by 31.12.2008 subject to the Applicant filing a usual undertaking on or before 31.10.2008.