IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 1770 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: February 18, 2009 M/s Ganpati Rice Mills …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA Present: Mr. Vikas Mohan Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Piyush Kant Jain, Addl. AG, Punjab, and Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab, for the respondents. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. Learned State counsel has placed on record the refund payment order dated 17.2.2009 (Mark ‘A’) showing that interest on the refund already made, has also been paid to the petitioner. In view of the above, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (H.S. BHALLA) February 18, 2009 JUDGE Pkapoor