IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-38681 of 2011 Date of decision : December 21, 2011 Sukhvir Singh @ Sukhi ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab ....Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. KS Kahlon, Advocate, for the petitioner L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) Accused Sukhvir Singh @ Sukhi has filed this petition for anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 148 dated 1.11.2011, under sections 323, 324, 34 IPC and section 326 IPC added later on, registered at Police Station Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the case file. The complainant in all suffered 12 injuries including two grievous injuries. Injury falling within the purview of section 326 IPC i.e. grievous hurt with sharp weapon is attributed to the petitioner. Consequently, he does not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail. Criminal Misc. No. M-38681 of 2011 -2- Counsel for the petitioner vehemently contended that according to report Annexure P/3, injury no. 2 was caused with blunt weapon. The contention cannot be accepted at this stage. Firstly, report Annexure P/3 does not specifically refer to injury no. 2. Secondly, this report was given three days after the injured was medico legally examined and the report was given on the basis that it was lacerated stitched wound measuring 0.3 cm. However, injury no. 2 is incised wound measuring 0.7 x 0.2 cm as per MLR, Annexure P/2. Consequently, report Annexure P/3 does not pertain to injury no. 2. In any event, injury no. 2 being incised wound was caused with sharp weapon as also specifically mentioned in the MLR. Dismissed without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the case. ( L.N. Mittal ) December 21, 2011 Judge 'dalbir'