COCP No. 1606 of 2010 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1606 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.8.2010 Mahinder Singh .....Petitioner Versus Tara Singh and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Malkeet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) The petitioner is the plaintiff in a suit for declaration to the effect that he is owner in possession of the land measuring 16 kanals. The petitioner and defendant No. 2 are sons of Tara Singh, defendant No.1. Thus, the dispute is within the family regarding the sale deed executed by defendant No.1 in favour of the petitioner and defendant No.2. The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of an ad- interim injunction order passed by the learned trial Court restraining defendant No.1 from dispossessing the plaintiff forcibly, still the plaintiff has been dispossessed. COCP No. 1606 of 2010 (O&M) [2] Keeping in view the nature of the relationship and the dispute between the parties regarding possession of the property alleged transferred by the father of the petitioner to the petitioner and defendant No.2, I do not find that any case is made out for initiating the contempt proceedings. If aggrieved the petitioner is an efficacious alternative remedy under Order 39 Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. [ HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 18.8.2010 ds