IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30662 of 2010 LAV KUSH TIWARY SON OF LATE SAKALDIP TIWARY, R/O VILLAGE- SARWARPUR, P.S.- MEHANDIA, DISTRICT- ARWAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 22/09/2010 Heard Mr. Akhileshwar Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected twice. Grievance of the petitioner is that though he is in custody since 21.3.2007 but up-till-now only four witnesses have been examined and they have not supported the prosecution case. The informant is deliberately avoiding his appearance, so the trial is unnecessarily being delayed. Report received from the learned trial court shows that four witnesses have been examined but informant, Investigating Officer and other prosecution witnesses are yet to be examined. Charges have been framed on 8.10.2007 and the trial court is taking all steps to conclude the trial at the earliest. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased of a case registered under Section 304B/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the role of the petitioner, his prayer for bail is again rejected. 2 However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail before the learned court below after examination of the informant. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) avin