1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. MISC. CIVIL APPLN.(REVIEW) NO.1297 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2678 OF 2006(D). GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPTT & OTH. Vs SHRI VISHWANATH RAMKRISHNA PATIL) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Shri Anoop Parihar, A.P.P. for Applicant. Shri D.T.Shinde, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & R.C.CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : MARCH 13, 2009. 1. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor argues that the observations contained in paragraph 13 of the judgment of this Court, which read as below : “.... There is no answer from the respondent as to why the petitioner's case could not have been referred to the Government for sanctioning his appointment under the aforesaid Circular. In view of this, we find it extremely difficult to gather reasons as to why the petitioner's appointment came to be suddenly terminated by the impugned order and, therefore, do not agree with the reasons given by the Administrative Tribunal for upholding the impugned order.” are recorded without adverting to the Government Circular dated 4th March, 1991. It is seen that even otherwise, copy of the said Government Circular was not brought on record in the writ petition. 2 2. It is seen that by failing to refer the matter to the Government respondents No.2 and 3 had taken the matter to themselves instead of permitting the Government to take a decision. 3. In these premises, we find that the grievance does not refer to the error apparent on the face of record. The point urged cannot be regarded to fit in the format of an error apparent on the face of record to be a ground for review. 4. Therefore, no ground is made out for review. 5. The Misc. Civil Application is, therefore, rejected. 6. In the circumstances parties shall bear own costs. JUDGE JUDGE RR.