IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1962 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1962 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1962 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra ... Applicant Vs. Sou. Lilabai Nana Gade & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. A.A. Mane, APP for Applicant - State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J : R.S. MOHITE, J : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE DATE DATE : 17TH JULY, 2008 : 17TH JULY, 2008 : 17TH JULY, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. :- :- :- 1. This is an application for leave to Appeal. 2. The accused have been acquitted for allegedly committing offence under Sections 498-A, 232, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. On reading of the impugned judgment and order, I find that the acquittal is based on cogent reasoning. The story of demand has been dis-believed, as it is found that the accused was earning substantially. The demand was allegedly made for part of a salary. As regards the cruelty, the learned lower Court has dis-believed 2 the alleged story of cruelty. Two neighbours were examined and they have not supported the case of the prosecution. There is no injury certificate. Several improvements made by the complainant have been referred. 4. In the circumstances, It is not the fit case for interference in an Appeal against acquittal. Leave is refused. Consequently, Appeal papers to be filed. ( R.S. MOHITE, J.) R.S. MOHITE, J.) R.S. MOHITE, J.)