1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 1373 OF 2010 Vinod s/o Shivhari Thakre v. The State of Maharashtra & anr. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's and Registrar's orders orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. V.S. Bapat Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. D.B. Yengal, ApP for respondent no.1. ..... CORAM: A.B.CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 3 rd SEPTEMBER, _2010. Heard. Mr.Bapat, learned counsel for the applicant argued that after the remand order made by this Court, the trial has started afresh from the stage, as was directed by this Court. The counsel for the applicant has strong belief and apprehension that the finding recorded by this Court in the revisional order may influence the learned trial Judge while deciding the fate of the trial. This Court while deciding the revision application had already directed that the trial shall be decided afresh, which clearly means that the Court should consider the matter and the submissions made by the parties afresh. 2 Therefore, there is no need to add superfluous words to the judgment of this Court. Criminal Application No. 1373/10 is disposed of. JUDGE /TA/