IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11306 of 2008 SANJAY R.KUMAR @ SANJAY KUMAR, son of Sri Raghunath Prasad, resident of Balkishunganj, P.S.Alamganj, Patna City, District- Patna. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar, Patna. 3. Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Excise, Bihar, Patna 4. Collector, Nalanda. 5. Excise Superintendent, Nalanda. …. Respondents. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Purnendu Singh, Advocate Mr. Mukesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the respondents : Mr. Harendra Prasad Singh, Government Advocate-VI Mr. Rajiv Kumar Singh, Junior Counsel to Government Advocate-VI ------ P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ------ Dated, the 23rd September, 2008 We heard the counsel for the petitioner. 2. It is not in dispute that the grant settled in favour of the petitioner related to the period from 20th July, 2001 to 31st March, 2002. It is also not in dispute that the quantity of country liquor supplied to the petitioner during the period of grant exceeded minimum guarantee quota. It is also admitted by the petitioner that minimum guarantee quota is fixed for the entire period of grant. If that be so, the contention of the petitioner that for the extra supply, which - 2 - was made from the month of August, 2001, the licence fee on extra supply could not have been made from 20th July, 2001 does not have any merit. In our view, for the excess supply, he was required to pay licence fee as per the terms provided in law as well in the agreement. 3. Dismissal of revision by the Member, Board of Revenue cannot be said to suffer from any legal infirmity. 4. Writ petition has no merit, and is dismissed in limine. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J. Sunil