1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTIC OF MOTION NO. 591 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO. 275 OF 2007 Indian Airlines Ltd. ...Plaintiffs Vs. Bharatiya Kamgar Sena & Ors. ...Defendants Mr. S.M. Dixit with Mr. Sandeep Mahadik Advocates for Plaintiffs Ms. Purnima Verma i/b. Mr. A.K. Menon for Defendants 1to 3. CORAM: SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED: 25 TH MARCH , 2009 P.C. 1. The Defendant is one of the 8 recognised Unions of the Plaintiffs. Defendants 2 and 3 are its members. The Plaintiff has alleged unlawful activities by shouting slogans, raising abuses, gheraoing the officers and holding of meetings etc., in their premises. Under the Interim order dated 8th December 2006 the activities of Defendants 1 to 3 were confined to New Terminal Building, Mumbai, Airport of Vileparle (East), Mumbai- 400 099. It was clarified that the Defendants shall not carry out the activities referred to, in the Notice of Motion anywhere else. The representative of the Defendants 1 to 3 made a statement that only peaceful 2 demonstrations will be held and that the members of the Union will not indulge in disrupting, preventing, interfering, instigating or adopting any other tactics which would disrupt the working of the Plaintiffs or any of its officers. He also made a statement that no activities, permissible or otherwise, would be carried out by Defendants 1 to 3 in the vicinity of the residential premises of the officers of the Plaintiffs. The statements and assurances were accepted. 2. In the Notice of Motion the Defendants had appeared on earlier dates of hearing. Thereafter, the Plaintiffs' name came to be amended. Affidavit in reply is also filed. 3. Though the Defendants may have a right as employees of the Plaintiffs to enter upon the premises of the Plaintiffs and also to strike lawfully, the Defendants will have no right to shout slogans, demonstrate, hold meetings, disrupt the working, interfere or prevent officers of the Plaintiffs, gherao them or abuse any one in any part of the premises. 4. Since the Defendants have made statements before the Court which are accepted in the interim order dated 8th December 2006, that order is continued pending the suit. 5. The Notice of Motion disposed off accordingly. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.)