IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 8466 of 2008. Decided on: 17th December, 2010. Sumesh Kumar. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent No. 3. : Ms. Kiran Dhiman, Advocate vice Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has assailed the appointed of respondent No. 3 to the post of Takniki Sahayak. The suitability of the petitioner and respondent No. 3 has been adjudged by a duly constituted Selection Committee. The petitioner has secured 28.13 marks, whereas respondent No. 3 has secured 35.13 marks. Since the suitability of the petitioner and respondent No. 3 has been gone into by a duly constituted Selection Committee, this Court cannot sit in appeal over the recommendations made by a duly constituted Selection Committee. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge November 17, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.