IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16921 of 2011 Kashi Nath @ Kashi Nath Paswan Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03/ 12.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the complainant. Petitioner is husband of the complainant and he is in jail custody since 17.3.2011. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that prior to filing of the present complaint case petitioner had filed a suit for restitution of his conjugal right but the complainant does not want to lead her conjugal life with the petitioner. Learned counsel for the complainant points out that the complainant filed a maintenance suit in the court of Faridabad and in spite of order of the aforesaid maintenance court, petitioner does not make any payment of maintenance to the complainant. So, this court should direct the petitioner to make payment of maintenance to the complainant. I am not at all impressed with the submission of the learned counsel for the complainant because this is not an execution court and this court does not think it proper to give any direction in respect of case pending in the court of Faridabad. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Kashi Nath @ Kashi Nath Paswan, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in 2 Complaint Case no. 2976/2004. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)