HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH ; BILASPUR Writ Petition (Q No. 6392 of2006 Petitioner Jai Prakash Pandey, S/o Late Rajdcv Pandey, ayed. about 44 years, R/o Nedaxa Niv^, New Adarsh Nagar, Diu^, Chhatdsgarh. Versus Respondents 1. Deputy Registear, Cooperative Socjeties, Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2. Nagarik Sahkari Bank Lunited, Dui^, Throi^h its Manager, Niyaji Coiaplcx, Polsaipara Chowk, Station Road, Durg, Chhattisgarh. 3. Authorized OfBcer, Nagarik SaUkari Baals Limited, Niyaji Compkx, Polsaipara Chowk, Station Road, Dui^, Chhatdsgarh. 4. Espat Karmachan Cooperative Societies Credit Liinited, Sahkari Sadan, Avenue 'A' Sector-6, Bhilai Nagar, District Dur^, Chhattisgarh. (Writ Petition iinder Article 226 of the Constitution of India) (SB; HonTste Shri Satish K. AgnihotriJ.) Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate with Shn Sidarth Rafhore, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt Advocate for the respondent No.l. Ms Renu Kocher, Advocate for the respondente No. 2 and 3. ORDBRtorall ( Passed on fhis 3td day ofJuly, 2009) Heard. t. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner submits fhat this matter pertains to recovery of debt aad as such, the petitloner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition wifh liberty to take recourse to the Debt Recoveiy Tdbunal uader the provisions ofthe Seciuitisation aad Recoastructton of Fmancial Assete aad Extforceinent of Secunty Interest Act, 2002. 2. 3. 4. 5. Thalan Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection. It is ordered, accordingly. The writ petition is accordiagly dismissed, as wifhdrawn, wifh the above-stated liberty, if so advised. As prayed, fhe iaterun order dated 20.11.2006 shall continue for a penod .of two weeks to enable fhe petitioner to take appropriate steps, ifso advised. — Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge