IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.W.P.No.979 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 8.9. 2009 Kewal Krishan Sharma ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : None for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. Two similar petitions filed by the same person and through the same counsel with the same prayer had come up earlier which were dismissed as withdrawn. This court on earlier occasion also had specifically put a question to the petitioner that how this petition under the provisions of Section 482 Cr.P.C. is maintainable for quashing of the notification. Now the petitioner once again filed this petition with similar prayer seeking quashing of the FIR and notification by filing a criminal writ petition. The office note also reveals that they had put an objection twice to the petition regarding its maintainability but yet the petitioner insisted that the matter be put up before the Bench. Case has been called out twice. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner. Obviously the petition is frivolous and has resulted Crl.W.P.No.979 of 2009 (O&M) -2- in sheer wastage of time of the court. The counsels are expected to play a more responsible role and they cannot be permitted to file such baseless petitions which are not in consonance with the provisions of law and procedure. They are supposed to be trained persons with adequate legal acumen which should be reflected in the pleadings and the remedy availed and not show ignorance and a stubborn indifference to the procedure. In this view of the matter, the petition is dismissed with costs of Rs.20,000/- which shall be recovered from the counsel who has filed this petition. The costs so recovered shall be deposited with the State Legal Services Authority, Chandigarh. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh is directed to ensure the compliance of this order. 8.9.2009 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss