IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASP CHHAmSGARH Contenapt Case (Civill No. '2- OF 2009 AppUcant •^on-applicant -^y \^\ '•••f' 9^^" !• •^^^^' ^^ ?^^ tespondent Contemnor /Balaram Singh Bais aged about 75 Years S/o Late Shri Mukund Skig Bais Retired Head Master -, f )^"Govt. Prmcipal School Matia Lrix£ Post Urmal Distt- Raipur Presently Residing at ViUage Biranpur, P.0. Devpur Nagri Distt.Dhamtari(C.G.) Versus Smt. R.Bambra W/o G.S. Bambra Aged about 56 years, Distt. Education OfEcer Raipur Disst- Raipur (C.G.) Conteinpt petition under Section^l2 ofconteinpt ofCourt Act 1971 read with article'215 of Constitution oflndia. L^3 "\ \" 311^'! ^I h-u* sn^v Sti^l'^ ^f?TT T5T •^l'iOcf'1!, ®fl1*f'is,fadl^y sn^r xra^? V) QrvA-CobQe.l'^-O • <?t| t<11CTI »t<iqi " " "'"'\''^ 20° iN^si' 311^1 ?Ti!IWHl%!I SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohd 1041-2011 Shri Vipin Banjare, counsel fjorUie petitioner. Shri Sumit Verma, counsel f4>r the respondent. Learned counsei for the pe The pedtion is disposed off. <^)^[<n^rl +i!+i(yiT'^ ^>^1 <r3)<-^i< ^arfSgifsil^l n Shrivastava. J. itioner submits that though belatedly, the order has been comptied with by ttte respondent and therefore, ttie petitioner does not want to press this petition) Considering that the order Ipassed by the Court has been complied with bythe respondent, the rule is ((ischarged. — —- Sd/- Manindra Mohari Shrivastava Judge