S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2145/2007. (Gurdeo Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others) 07.01.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS ______________________________________ Mr. B.L. Maheshwari for the petitioner. Mr. Chaitanya Gahlot/Mr. B.L. Choudhary for respondent(s). Mrs. Pratishtha Dave, Addl. Govt. Counsel. The main contention of the petitioner is that upon applications filed by respondents No.3 and 4 permits were granted by the Secretary, RTA, Bikaner but, in fact, no formal order has been passed by the RTA for granting permits in favour of respondents No.3 and 4. It is contended that even in the absence of formal order, only on the basis of circulation note dated 02.03.2007 the permits have been issued in favour of respondents No.3 and 4. In my opinion, for granting any permit some formal order requires to be passed on the application for grant of permit. In this case, gross irregularity appears to have been committed by the authority and no formal order has been passed after preparation of the circulation note. Moreover, this fact is not disputed by the respondents in the reply. The writ petition, therefore, deserves to be allowed. In view of the aforesaid, while quashing Annex.-4, Annex.- 5 and Annex.-6 passed by the RTA Bikaner, the case is remitted to the Secretary, RTA, Bikaner to decide the matter afresh in accordance with law within a reasonable time. It is however clarified that in this case permits have been issued without there being any formal orders. Respondent No.1 is, therefore, directed to look into the matter and enquire whether the matter warrants any disciplinary action to be taken against erring officials of the State. (Gopal Krishan Vyas) J. Ojha, a.