1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 3470 of 1994(O&M). Date of Decision: 5.9.2011 *** Balwan Singh & Ors. .. Petitioners VS. Haryana State Electricity Board & Ors. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR, Present:- Mr. R.K. Malik, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Renu, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sudhir Kumar Hooda, Advocate for the respondents. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The petitioners are seeking direction for their employment in the respondent-Electricity Board in terms of the policy of the Board to employ one member of the family whose land has been acquired for construction of the Thermal Power Plant at Panipat. The writ petition was admitted for final hearing. With the filing of CM No. 3377 of 2011 the petitioners have prayed for disposal of the instant writ petition in terms of directions issued by this Court while disposing of CWP No. 16243 of 1993, titled as Raj Pal & Ors. Vs. Haryana State Electricity Board & Anr., on 29.6.2010, while relying upon the case of Rameshwar & Anr. Vs. HSEB & Ors. (CWP No.3159 of 1993). However, it has been brought to the notice of this Court that the directions issued by the learned Single Judge in the CWP No.3159 of 1993 were modified by the Division Bench of this Court while disposing of LPA No. 259 of 1995, decided on 19.5.1995, but the same could not be 2 brought to the notice of learned Single Judge while disposing of CWP No. 16243 of 1993. Faced with the situation, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioners has confined his argument that the present writ petition be disposed of in terms of decision rendered by the Division Bench in LPA No. 259 of 1995. Learned counsel for the respondents has failed to show that the case of the petitioners herein is distinguishable from the case of petitioners in the aforesaid writ petition. In view of this, the instant writ petition is disposed of in terms of directions issued by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 259 of 1995 by dint of which the directions issued in Rameshwar's case (supra) were modified. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE September 5,2011 Jiten