1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6882 OF 2009 Jay Kisan Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Undri (P.M.), Taluka Mukhed, Dist.Nanded through its Secretary, Shivaji Namdeo Dhange, Age 35 years, Occu.Agriculture and Social Worker, R/o at Post Dattanagar, Jalkot, Tq. Jalkot, District Latur .. PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Women and Child Development Department, IIIrd Floor, New Administrative Bhavan, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032 2. The Commissioner, Women and Child Development, Maharashtra State, Pune-1 Near G.P.O. Pune -1 Taluka and Dist.Pune (3) The District Women and | Respdt.No.3 deleted Child Development Officer, | as per leave of the Class-I, Latur, Tq.and Dist. | Court dt.14.10.2009 Latur .. RESPONDENTS Shri K.T.Shirurkar, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.V.Kurundkar, Addl.Govt.Pleader for respondents 1 and 2 Respondent No.3 as per leave granted by the Court dated 14.10.2009 CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ DATE : 14th October 2009 2 ORAL JUDGMENT [ PER P.V.HARDAS , J ] 1. Shri K.T.Shirurkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to delete respondent No.3 as no relief is claimed against respondent No.3. We grant leave at the risk of the petitioner. Deletion to be carried out forthwith. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 3. According to the petitioner – trust, the petitioner trust had submitted four different proposals for opening of Balak Ashram. The aforesaid proposals are said to be pending consideration with respondent No.1. In that light of the matter, therefore, we are inclined to hear and decide this petition finally at this stage 4. Since the proposals are said to be pending consideration with respondent No.1, we direct respondent No.1 to decide the said proposals, if pending, in accordance with law, within period of three months from today and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner. 3 Rule is thus made absolute on the above terms with no orders as to costs. ( A.V.POTDAR ) ( P.V.HARDAS ) JUDGE JUDGE vvr/6882.09wp