IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. : 8086 of 2008. Decided on: 1st September, 2010. _________________________________________________________ Dhyan Singh. …Petitioner. -Versus- H.P. State Electricity Board through its Secretary, Vidyut Bhawan, Shimla. …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 NO. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. B.S. Ranjan, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge(Oral): Petitioner has filed the present petition seeking directions to the respondent to allow him promotional scale after completion of 9/16 years service. 2. The case of the respondent-Board, in a nut-shell, is that the category of the petitioner was not covered in letter dated 31.01.1991 (Annexure A-6). However, Mr. B.S. Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record a copy of letter dated 2nd September, 2004, whereby now the category to which the petitioner belongs has been included for the purpose of grant of promotional scale. 3. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider the case of petitioner for promotional scale after completion of 9/16 years of service from the due date within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge September 01, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.