IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.358 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.256 OF 1999 Pukhraj Bansilal Sancheti ...Applicant. v. Popatlal Bansilal Chordiya & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.R.D.Soni i/by M/s.Ram & Co., adv. For the Applicant. Mr.Sarang S. Aradhye, adv. For the Respondent Nos.1A to 1D. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : 5th August , 2009 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the Parties. 2 The appellant, who is respondent in the present application has challenged decree for specific performance and obtained stay to the execution of the decree. Having obtained stay, he executed sale deed in favour of the respondent no.5 about the suit property. By the order dated 13th March, 2009, this Court had restrained respondent no.5 from further alienating in suit property or from creating any third party interest thereon. No reply has been filed thereafter by the respondent no.5. I do not find this case to be fit for appointment of Court Receiver as prayed in prayer clause (c). 3 Therefore, respondent no.5 shall not create any third party - 2 - interest in the suit property and shall maintain status-quo in respect of the suit property. 4 Application stands disposed off. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)