1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.680 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5009 OF 2005 Shaikh Mudir Alisahab & Ors. ..Applicants. Vs. Nashik Mahanagar Palika Kamgar Karmachari Mahasangh & Ors. .. Respondents. .... Mr. P.N. Joshi for the Applicants. Mr. R.V. More for Respondent No.1. Mr. M.S. Karnik for Respondent No.3. Mr. A.D. Shetty for Respondent No.4. .... CORAM : KSHITIJ R. VYAS, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. 6th March, 2006. P.C. : It is the grievance of the Applicants that though while disposing of Writ Petition 5009 of 2005 on 27th October, 2005, this Court has given directions to the Assistant Labour Commissioner, the Assistant Labour Commissioner is not considering the claim of the Applicants since nothing is stated in the said order. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the Applicants that in the list submitted by the contractor to the Corporation the names 2 of the Applicants are already there. If that is so, the Assistant Labour Commissioner shall consider the claim of the Applicants after hearing the parties. With this clarification, the Civil Application is disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.