1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO.588 OF 2010 AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO.589 OF 2010 AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO.590 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.656 OF 2003 (ANANT PURUSHOTTAM TRIVEDI VS. MAHESHKUMAR RAMKISHORE GUPTA & OTH.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.P.Kariya, Advocate for Appellant. CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A.NAIK, J. DATE : APRIL 28, 2010. 1. Heard Shri Kariya, the learned counsel for the applicants. 2. By these applications the applicants seek condonation of delay in filing application for substitution of their names on record, for setting aside abatement, if any, and for permission to substitute their names in place of the deceased appellant on record. 3. None appears on behalf of the respondents. The respondents have also not filed any reply to the civil 2 applications. The statements of facts made in the application for condonation of delay in filing the application for substitution and for setting aside abatement remained uncontroverted. 4. Hence, for the reasons stated in the said applications, the delay in filing the application for substitution is condoned. The abatement, if any, is set aside and the applicants are permitted to substitute their names on record. The necessary amendment may be carried out within a period of two weeks. 6. All the three applications are allowed and disposed of. JUDGE RR..