IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 11TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 20TH KARTHIKA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 6985 of 2010() ---------------------------------------- IN RELATION TO CBCID CR NO.9/CR/SII/09 (CR. NO.819/2008 OF VADAKKEKARA POLICE STAITON ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. ............. APPLICANT/5TH ACCUSED ----------------------------------------- BAINU.K.K, S/O.KUTTAPPAN,PARACKAL HOUSE, KUMARANALLOOR,KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.MVS.NAMBOOTHIRY RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................. Bail Application No.6985 of 2010 ..................................................... Dated: 11th day of November, 2010 ORDER Petitioner, who is the 5th accused in Crime No.819/2008 of Vadakkekara Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 489A, B, C and D read with Section 34 of I.P.C., seeks his enlargement on bail. The petitioner was arrested on 16.9.2010. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioner, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) dmb