* 1 * c.p.176.2008 19.9.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 176 OF 2008 FROM WRIT PETITION NO. 2792 OF 2008 M/s. Master Education Society .....Petitioners V/S. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents * * * * * Mr. G.T. Kanchapurana i/by. Mr. S.G. Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP for the State-respondent no.1. Mr. G.S. Hegde with Mr. P.B. Kadam, Advocate for respondents no.2 and 3-CIDCO. Mr. R.Y. Shankar i/by. Mr. R.C. Dhuru, Advocate for respondents no.4 and 6. Ms. Reshma Bhosale i/by. Mr. S.P. Kadam, Advocate for respondent no. 5. CORAM :- R.M. BORDE, J. 19 September, 2011. P.C. :- 1. The petitioner is allegedly in contempt. The contempt alleged is in respect of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court on 5th May, 2008. The CIDCO authorities had sanctioned a plan submitted by respondents no.4 and 5 to which the adjoining owner objected. While disposing off the writ petition, CIDCO authorities were directed * 2 * c.p.176.2008 19.9.2011 to consider the objection raised by the adjoining owner and decide the application tendered by the adjoining owner in accordance with the provisions of law. The CIDCO authorities accordingly have dealt with the application and turned down the objection and confirmed the plan which was sanctioned earlier in pursuance to the application tendered by respondents no.4 and 5. The adjoining owner raised a challenged to the decision rendered by the CIDCO authorities on their objection by presenting writ petition bearing number 148 of 2010 which was also turned down by this Court. In this view of the matter, nothing survives for consideration in this contempt petition. The contempt petition is devoid of any merits and is therefore dismissed. The notice issued to the respondents stands discharged. {R.M. BORDE, J]