C.W.P. No. 6366 of 2009 Ajmer Singh and another vs. State of Haryana and another Present: Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. *** Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the claim of the petitioners for being considered for promotion is being flouted and that posts which have been lying vacant for the past two years are not being filled up regularly. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he would be satisfied if respondent No.1 decides the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P-1) by passing a speaking order thereon within a reasonable time since petitioner No.1 is to retire in July, 2009. I find this to be a fair request. Consequently this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to decide the representation (Annexure P-1) of the petitioners by passing a speaking order thereon within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE April 28, 2009 sunita