G- y • IN THE HIGH COURT OF^JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. No. 2^2-8/l':T/20Q(8'(S.B.) (Other matter) PETITIONER ,l?.fe'^ ^^^- ...jis>^-">>"" .,»°*" c.\l<^**'*.. ^.•••*** A'y"'^^.-'' ^^ A-'"' ^ ( M/s. Anil Engineering Works Through Partner Shankar Lal Sharma S/o. Late Mangtu Ram Sharma, aged about- 66 years R/o. Jhunjhunwala Complex, Darri Road Korba, Tah- SE Distt.- Kprba (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS i€ ^- ,'-•'2' -' Y-i' ^ ^lt '^ State of Chhattisgarh Through: - The Secretary Industries Departraent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.; General Manager, District Trade and Industries Centre, Korba, Distt.- Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226^227'OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE^F SUITABLE WRIT, WRITS, DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. '^ HICT COURT OF CWATn.S6AW: BILASPUK Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. W,P, No.228of Petitioner- ; M/s. Ahil Engineering Works Versus State of Chhattisgarh and anolher Si'^ y- Present: AAr. N.K. Chatterjee, counsel for -riie petitioner. Mur. Utkarsh Vermc. t)eput/ Sovernment Advocate for OR&ER l+h (Passed on 14T" Day of Februory, 2007) 1. Lsarned coun%l appecring for the petitioner seeks permission of •i+iis Court- to withdraw fnis petition wi1+! iiberty to pursue the repr'esentation pending before respondent No. 2. He further submits thot a direction be issued to tiie concemed aul+iority for deciding the rept-esentation within the stipulated thne. It is ordered accordingiy. . 2. The respondent No. 2 is directed to consider ond decide the representation within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of ct copy of ihis order'. 3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as witiidrawn with tiie above stated libsrty. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Subiiash