(Spl.-H.C.A.S.,C.D.,78-e) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 183 OF 2004. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Note, Office Memoranda of Quorum, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s Orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. M.S. Sonak, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.S. Kantak, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Mr. G. Shirodkar, Additional Government Advocate for the respondent no. 2. Coram : S.A. BOBDE AND N.A. BRITTO, JJ. Date : 7th June 2004. P.C.: Heard Mr. Sonak, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Kantak, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 and Mr. Shirodkar, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent no. 2. 2. We are not inclined to entertain this petition. Nevertheless we direct the Commissioner of the Corporation of City of Panaji to treat the representation, dated 6th - 2 - February 2004, of the petitioner as an appeal filed against the suspension order issued by the Municipal Engineer and dispose of the said appeal as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of 2 months from today. Nothing survives in the petition and, therefore, the same is, hereby, disposed off. The petitioner shall be heard by the said Commissioner before disposing the said representation/appeal, dated 6th February 2004. S.A. BOBDE, J. N.A. BRITTO, J. ed’s.