1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5820 OF 2008 Abhay Arya s/o Yakubalikhan @ (Ahesanalikhan s/o Yakubalikhan) ...Petitioner Versus Sau. Vidyawati w/o Abhay Arya @ Ahesanalikhan s/o Yakubalikhan) ...Respondent ..... Mr. None for the petitioner Mr. B.G. Deshmukh, advocate for respondent No. ..... CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2009 PER COURT:- 1 This Court on 15.9.2009, has taken a note of the fact that the matter is being adjournment from time to time i.e. on 31.7.2009, 17.8.2009 and on 1.9.2009 only because the counsel appearing for the petitioner remained absent. As a last chance, on 15.9.2009, again the matter was adjourned to today. Today, when the matter is called out, none appears for the petitioner. 2 With the assistance of the learned counsel for the respondent, I have perused the affidavit in reply and on perusal of para 2 it clearly 2 appears that the impugned order can be challenged some where else and remedy is available to the petitioner to avail appropriate steps by way of filing second appeal/cross objection etc. Therefore, writ petition is not maintainable, hence, the same is dismissed. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. *****