THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 23551 of 2008 Oral order: The petitioners questioning the notices dated 07.11.2006 issued by the 1st respondent, namely the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (Now Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation), under Section 636 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the HMC Act’) calling upon them to remove the deviations and unauthorized constructions made by them on the 6th and 7th floors of the building in question, they filed the present writ petition. This Court while order dated 10.11.2006, while admitting the writ petition, granted status quo for a period of two weeks, which was later extended. The respondents filed counter taking a stand that the respondents on 03.11.2006 issued notice to the petitioners under Section 452 of the HMC Act calling upon them to show cause as to why the unauthorized constructions made by them should not be demolished, but as they did not submit any explanation, the present final notices under Section 636 of the Act, was issued, and no illegality or irregularity can be attributed to the respondents in issuance of the impugned notices. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners made applications to the respondents for regularization of the illegal and unauthorized constructions in terms of G.O. Ms. No. 901, dated, Municipal Administration & Urban Development (M1) Department, dated 31.12.2007, and the same are still pending. In view of the pendency of the consideration of the regularization applications, both the counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: Till the applications of the petitioners for regularization of the illegal and unauthorized constructions, pointed out in the impugned notices, are considered and disposed of in terms of G.O. Ms. No. 901, dated, Municipal Administration & Urban Development (M1) Department, dated 31.12.2007, the respondents are directed not to effect any demolition of the unauthorized constructions alleged to have been made by the petitioners, in pursuance of the impugned notices. It is made clear that the petitioners shall not make any further constructions or create any third party rights pending consideration of their regularization applications. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 19th January, 2009. KSR