Crl. Misc. No. M-12408 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-12408 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 02.05.2011 Rinku Gollan @ Surinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus Priyanka and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Bhim Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 18.03.2011 (Annexure P3) passed by the learned Sessions Judge, whereby the revision filed by the respondents was allowed and it was held that respondent No. 1 was entitled to receive an amount of Rs.2000/- per month and respondent No. 2 Aditya was entitled to receive an amount of Rs.1000/- per month as interim maintenance allowance from the date of filing of the application till final decision of the main petition. It was further held that respondents were also entitled to receive an amount of Rs.5000/- as litigation expenses and the petitioner was directed to pay arrears of interim maintenance allowance and litigation expenses within one month. As per record, petitioner is earning Rs.6000/- per month and agriculture land has been shown in the name of his father. Initially the respondents have been granted maintenance at rate of Rs.1000/- to respondent No. 1 and Rs.500/- to respondent No. 2. In the present scenario, the lower Court has rightly modified the Crl. Misc. No. M-12408 of 2011 (O&M) -2- orders dated 21.05.2010 and 15.01.2011 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Kapurthala and has allowed the revision petition filed by the respondents. In view of the above, impugned order dated 18.03.2011 does not suffers from any infirmity. Dismissed as having no merits. May 02, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) G.Arora JUDGE