CW 16820/10 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.16820/2010 Dinesh Bandhu Sharma Versus State & Ors. Date of Order ::: 22/12/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Vijay Singh, for petitioner Instant petition has been filed with the grievance that learned Tribunal while dismissing appeal-721/2010 (3854/2010) vide order dt.24/11/2010 has directed the petitioner to make representation before the competent authority who was directed to decide it in accordance with law and pendente his representation, order of transfer impugned has been kept in abeyance. Counsel submits that if observations made by learned Tribunal vide order dt. 24/11/2010 are taken note of by the competent authority, certainly he will not get justice while deciding his representation. This Court finds substance in the submissions made by Counsel for the reason that once the Tribunal has come to the conclusion that the petitioner has to submit representation, it would be open for him to raise all such grievance admissible under the law to be raised and is equally open for the authority to examine it independently and not to be influenced by observations made by learned Tribunal. CW 16820/10 //2// Consequently, without expressing any opinion on merits, the writ petition stands disposed of with the clarification that the petitioner will be at liberty to raise all objections as admissible under law in his representation being submitted pursuant to order dt.24/11/2010 of the Tribunal and if made, it may be independently examined and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law without being influenced by the observations made by learned Tribunal. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p2/ 16820CW2010Dec22DsIntRlfTrb.doc