IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15992 of 2008 SURENDRA YADAV @ VIP YADAV @ RAJU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 14-05-2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is accused in a case under Section 302, 364 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code ands Section 27 of the Arms Act. The allegation is that accused Ramayan Sharma along with 10-15 unknown persons entered into the house of the informant and shot dead the informant’s mother Sushila Devi. They kidnapped the informant’s nephew Piyush Kumar and took him away. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The victim boy returned back on 23.4.2006. His statement under Section 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. was recorded in which he did not name the petitioner. He further submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case merely on the basis of suspicion. Learned counsel pointed out that the F.I.R. named co-accused Ramayan Sharma has been allowed bail by another Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 224 of 2007. He submitted that two more accused have also been allowed bail by this Court and the case of the petitioner is also similarly situated. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely, Surendra Yadav @ VIP Yadav @ Raju Yadav is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Maharajganj (Siwan) P.S. Case No. 43 of 2006. S.Sb/- (Madhavendra Saran, J.) 2