[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.610 OF 2007 Appa Rajaram Varadm ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Sunil Waghmare counsel for Applicant Ms.S.V.Gajre A.P.P. for the State Mr.T.Radhakrishna for Respondent No.2 ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : MARCH 9, 2007 DATE : MARCH 9, 2007 DATE : MARCH 9, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant-original accused, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 original complainant, the learned A.P.P. for the State and the complainant who is present in Court. 2. The applicant is seeking quashing of Case No. 575/PW/2005 which is pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 29th Court, Dadar, Mumbai. The said case is under Section 498-A of IPC. The learned counsel for the respondent no.2 states that parties have amicably settled the dispute and the [-2-] complainant does not wish to persue her complaint. The complainant has also stated that she does not wish to pursue her complaint and the case may be quashed. In view of this statement, and in view of the decision of the Apex Court in in the case of B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of Haryana and B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of Haryana and B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of Haryana and another reported in Judgment Today 2003(3) S.C. another reported in Judgment Today 2003(3) S.C. another reported in Judgment Today 2003(3) S.C. 277, 277, 277, Case No. 575/PW/2005 pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 29th Court, Dadar, Mumbai is quashed. 4. Application is disposed of. [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]