1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 3701 of 2009 Dyneshwar and anr v. The State of Maharashtra -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr V.A. Brahme, Adv for applicants Mr A.S. Fulzele, APP for State Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 11th January 2010 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned APP for State. Interim anticipatory bail was granted in favour of the applicants vide order dated 17th December 2009 subject to certain conditions. Learned APP is not in a position to state as to whether applicants were arrested pursuant to the said order and granted benefit of interim anticipatory bail. Even though it is alleged that complaint was made on 6th October 2009 itself, there is no material to show that complaint was received by the police on the day of incident. If the date of complaint is taken as 31st October 2009, as it appears from record, there is unexplained delay in lodging FIR at this stage. Moreover, final report in respect of viscera and cause of death is still awaited. There is no complaint that during the interregnum the applicants have violated any of the conditions imposed by this 2 Court while granting them benefit of anticipatory bail. 2. In view of the aforesaid discussion, I am inclined to confirm the order dated 17th December 2009. Hence, order granting interim anticipatory bail dated 17th December 2009 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions as are contained therein. Application disposed of accordingly. Judge. Hsj