IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 27TH NOVEMBER 2006 / 6TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 Bail Appl..No. 6865 of 2006() ----------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN BA.5582/2006 Dated 18/09/2006 CRIME NO.173/06 OF CHEVAYUR POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED: -------------------------- P. VASUDEVAN, S/O.RAMAN NAIR, AGED 40 YEARS, PULLAT HOUSE, PAYYAIMBRA POST, KUNNAMANGALAM (VIA), KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.SHRIHARI RAO SMT.N.SHOBHA RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT: -------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI JAI GEORGE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/11/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------------------- B.A.No. 6865 OF 2006 ----------------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 27th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2006 O R D E R Petitioner, who is the first accused in Crime No.173/06 of Chevayur Police Station for offences punishable under sections 452, 341 and 323 read with section 34 IPC seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. Anticipatory bail was once refused to the petitioner as per Annexure-A order dated 18.9.2006 in B.A.No.5582/06. One of the allegations put against the petitioner was that he is involved in other crimes. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to an applicant like the petitioner. There is no reason why the petitioner should not seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the J.F.C.M.-I, Kozhikode and files an application for regular bail within one week from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably on the same date on which it is filed. With this observation this application is dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE dsn