Crl.Misc No.M 30755 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : November 07, 2011 1. Crl.Misc No.M 30755 of 2011 Pamma Ferozpuria @ Pawan Kumar vs State of Punjab 2. Crl. Misc No. M 31361 of 2011 Avtar Singh @ Ghappa vs State of Punjab 3. Crl. Misc No. M 31659 of 2011 Vikas Kaushal vs State of Punjab 4. Crl. Misc No. M 32562 of 2011 Deepak @ Machher and another vs State of Punjab 5. Crl. Misc No. M 32580 of 2011 Rohit Victor vs State of Punjab *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Gurvinder Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S.Gill, DAG Punjab *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioners seek grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 54, dated 1.6.2011, registered under Sections 452, 363, 366, 323, 148, 149, 376 (added later-on) of the IPC, and Sections 25, 27, 54, 59 of the Arms Act, at Police Station Rampura, Bathinda. Crl.Misc No.M 30755 of 2011 ::2:: On 12.10.2011, the following contentions were noticed in Crl. Misc No. M 30755 of 2011 :- “ Learned counsel has argued that the falsity of the FIR can be gazed by the fact that the daughter of the complainant had eloped with the main accused and they had moved an application for protection before this Court and the daughter of the complainant thereafter moved a complaint in respect of the present FIR alleging that her father had got a false FIR recorded and got her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C to the same effect recorded before the Magistrate, Rampuraphul.” Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from ASI Gurjant Singh, has accepted the factual assertions but has stated that thereafter the daughter of the complainant suffered yet another statement in which she has changed her stand. In these circumstances, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Consequently, in the event of their arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail by the Investigating Officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Petitions stand disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 07, 2011. JUDGE `kk'