IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI MONDAY, THE 8TH JUNE 2009 / 18TH JYAISHTA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 320 of 2007 ---------------------------- O.P.NO.645/2004 OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM AT ETTUMANOOR PETITIONER: APPELLANT/RESPONDENT ------------------------------------ K.V.THOMAS, S/O. VARKEY, AGED 57 YEARS, KOONANICKAL HOUSE, (KADUVAKULANGARA), ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., PADINJATTUMBHAGOM KARA, ATHIRAMPUZHA VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.J.JAMES RESPONDENT : PETITIONER -------------------------- SMT. ELSY KURIAN, D/O. KURIAN, AGED 38 YEARS, IRUMBUVETTIYANICKAL HOUSE, KATTAMBAKKU P.O., KATTAMBAKKU KARA, NJEEZHOOR VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.MATHAI VARKEY MUTHIRENTHY FOR R1 THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/06/2009 ALONG WITH MAT.APPEAL NO.321 OF 2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ------------------------------------ C.M.Appl.No.1235 of 2007 in Mat.Appeal Nos.320 of 2007 & C.M.Appl.No.1235 of 2007 in Mat.Appeal No.323 of 2007 and Mat.Appeal Nos.320 and 323 of 2007 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of June, 2009 ORDER/JUDGMENT BASANT, J. The Mat.Appeals are directed against a common order passed by the Family Court. These appeals have been filed along with applications for condonation of delay. 2. When these applications for delay and the Mat.Appeals came up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner submits that all outstanding disputes have been settled between the parties. All the amounts payable have been paid. In these circumstances, the appellant does not want to prosecute the petitions for condonation of delay and the Mat.Appeals. The learned counsel for the respondent accepts that the entire amounts due under the impugned common order have already been paid. C.M.Appl.No.1235 of 2007 in Mat.Appeal Nos.320 of 2007& C.M.Appl.No.1235 of 2007 in Mat.Appeal No.323 of 2007 and Mat.Appeal Nos.320 and 323 of 2007 2 3. Recording that submission of the counsel for both sides, these petitions for condonation of delay and the Mat.Appeals are dismissed as agreed. Needless to say, the order of attachment passed shall stand vacated. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) rtr/-