BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF'_CHHATTISAGARH_AT BILASPUR (C.G.1 «.».....a^a-»-3 CIVIL REVISION No55 /2010 s1*"^"' """'"•"" AAPPLICANT /DEFENDANT Shambhucharan Panda S/o Chamaruram Panda, Aged about 60 years, R/o Village- Vishwanathpali, Tahsil 85 District- Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS XON- /'APPLICANTS 'ff^-"" S/o Shri A. Pyarelal • Gupta Kunjbihari Gupta, 2. Gautam Prasad Gupta S/o Shri Chaudchandra Gupta, Both by caste- Kolta, R/o Village- Vishwanathpali, Tahsil & District- Raigarh (C.G.). fPLAINTIFFS) ^f' State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Collector, Raigarh (C.G.). (DEFENDANT N0. 21 CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 B^: -HG—78 »(1*{CTI ShHRi 3%T "4iqid.q, ytil'H^lfi, fqclKHy ...a^...,..2S.....f.-\0... 3(1^1 'tpRT (1clt^sl<IEI) sn^i ^r P;-<i<*i W^ 3T1^?T sh*i|ch ^iiWHfersn^i Sahu S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. fw 12.03.2010 Shri SKTiwari, Advocate fo Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Learned counsel appes instructions, seeks permission revision with liberty to raise statement which the applicant under Order 7 Rule 1 1 of CPC be| Prayer is allowed. Consequently, the revision| the above stated liberty, How^ applicant raises such objection ir| below shall frame issue on thps^ accordance with law on their ownl ring for the appticant, on t>f this court to withdraw this jll the grounds in the written h^s raised by way of application Fore the court below. ^N?pih twrcif-cf fe^ tfsi^re ^T •nfin •sn^r hwal the applicant. tovt. Advocate for State. is dismissed as withdrawn with 'ver, it is directed that if the the written statement, the court points and decide the same in merits. No order asto costs. Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge •jfasS^^sSS^S^