1 fa1505-09 rpa FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.1505 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Mrs. Sunita N. Dabholkar for the appellant. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : JULY 11, 2011. P.C.: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. This Appeal is directed against the order dated 1st August, 2009 passed by the learned Commissioner under the Workmens' Compensation Act, 1923. There is no Appeal preferred against an order passed on the claim application made under Section 22 of the said Act. The order impugned has been passed on an application made by the appellant for setting aside the order passed on the main claim application. 2 fa1505-09 2. The impugned order is not covered by any of the clauses (a) to (e) of Sub Section 1 of Section 30 of the said Act of 1923. Hence, Appeal under Section 30 of the said Act of 1923 for challenging order dated 1st August, 2009 is not maintainable. Accordingly, Appeal is dismissed as not maintainable, however, it will be open for the appellant to adopt appropriate remedy for challenging the impugned order. (A.S.OKA, J.)