^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BSLASPUR Sinate Beneh Compiainant Appellant Petitipner Contenssor Respondent No-1 Contemnor Respondent No.2 Contemnor Resoondent No.3 Contemnor S/o Contemnor No.2 Hon'ble Shri DiSip Raosaheb Deshmukh. J. ConfcPet.No. 21 Oof 2008 . Durbadal Singh, son of Shri Amritsai, aged about 50 (54) years, oaste - Rathiya, occupation - Agricultun'st, R/o Vitl. Pakhnakot, Post - Supkalo, P.S. - Kapoo, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Ragarh (C.G.) Versus 1. Roopan Sai, son of Shri Saadhram, aged about 30 years. 2. Dilip Sai, son of Shri Sadhram, aged about 28 years. 3. Ramvilas, son of Shri Roopansai, aged about 16 years (Presentiy major - 20 years) 4. Gyani, son of Dilip Sai, aged about 25 years. AK are agriculturist, R/o vHlage Pakhanakot, Post - Supkalo, P.S. - Kapoo, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, DisSt. Ragarh (C.G.) Petition under Section 12 of the Contemot ofCourts Act. 1971 read vwth Article 215 of the Constitution of India Present : Shri A.N.Bhakta, counsel for the petitioner. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 21st July, 2009) Learned counsel for the applicant sought permissbn to withdraw this revjsion with jiberty to move an application for modification in the order dated 30.09.2cx)4 passed in Seeond Appeal No. 262/2004 to the effect that the appeliant was in possession on the clate ofthe order. 2. Reserving the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for, the petitfon is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ,^ '