c ^^o^t^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE MATTER OF W.P. /2004 1<* •.<> <\ RESPQNDENTS: PETITIONER: M/S R.R. CIVIL SERVICES THROUGH PROPRIETOR SHRI RAMESH KUMAR RATHORE, SON OF LATE SHRI R.L. RATHORE, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE & POST KAUDIA, TAH. SEEPAT ,DISTRICT BILASPUR [C.G) VERSUS 1. THE EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, MINISTRY OF LABOUR, GOVT. OF INDIA) THROUGH THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, REGIONAL OFFICE, RAIPUR (C.G.) THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER & QUASI JUDICIAL AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 7-A OF EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUNDS 85 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT 1952, SHRI BIBHISHAN PADHAN, REGIONAL OFFICE, RAIPUR [C.G.] STATE BANK OF INDIA, THROUGH THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, SEEPT, BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT/ORDER OR DIRECTION AS DEEMED FIT ;/ 3. i^^^:.;; T XI-HC-22 STT^T^T f^ri^F3T^T 5ti^i<=h ^f^a 'l,J ^. ^ ~s^ ^ll^lld<LI, ^Tii<i^<o, l^^i^y 3ir^r x^ra? WRWgTW^ **"'"*" *"W^ 200^ '^^r'"""""""""""""" ^TT^T ^RTT^T "^cT 20.09.2004 On a xnention beiag xnade Ku.SuxutaJoin, counael Application for Heard. tirgcn.1 licaj|ing 1 fhe matter is taicen up, fe{r tibe petltioner(s). ju» allowcd. petitio|»er competbnt It is stated tiiat the uiidcr Exaployccs Prov^lcnt Act, 1952. Leamicd counsel far| Bixxployeee Psx>vident Fund labourcrs/eiaployees are aot are in great difficulty and Uiey fturttier submlts fhat for tlie oxi opportaxuty of filirtg fb^ Respondent no,2/the considered on its owa merits in Havtag considercd aad fbe inerits of tfae caae, ixi the op|3 wiil be seived if a diiiccliou is deteiled representetion raisin| tio,2/fhc coinpctexit aufhority" fhis order, wifhiu 10 days. aad tiie competent aufhority of fbe bv a reasoned order on ite OWDI early aa poasible preferobfy of the reprcsentatbn. It is remaias, fhe pardes mcludiog available under the law, Wifh the aforesaid disposed of. Consequenfly app!icatioE| dlsposed of, C.C. as per rules. Aclcount be|ng pr^sent a^xig witfapbci ixiaflie Ifae cbi^(<n<flrt 'RP^rf"? 'f^st ^t^K ^r 3^Ni=r ^[^ is a contractor wMo is eovercd Fubd and Misc^Uancous Provisions fhe i^titioaer submitted fhat fhe haa be^a sei^sd aad fhe paid their dues, as such tliey {|ire at the ver^e of starvation. She the peUtioi^rs may t»e glven detcdled a^epreeeittation before aufhority, which shall be ^ccordance wiffei law. ^lfbout expressmg aay opialoxi oa oplinion ofthis Court, ei3ds ofjustice feiveu lo tbe peUiioiwi's to inakc a gt'ievances befo?iR respondent wifh a copy of tihc pctltiiMi. aaid jan such reprcsetitation being fited. ^espondents shafl decide the same merits in accordairce wifh law as 4 weeka ficora tfae date of receipt ciear that if any grievanee stiil petitioner msy avail fhe remedy ob^eryatioais t^ ryatioais^ thie petition ^tande for uiterim rdief also stands Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [Ti^ ^Rsi^