IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19506 of 2011 1. Parmod Kumar, S/O-Sri Rama Shankar Ram 2. Puna Devi, w/o- Ramashankar Ram Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. ----------- 02 08.07.2011 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners points out that in first page of the application, in the address of the petitioners, in place of P.S. Mohamdabad, it has inadvertently been typed as P.S. Mohamsabad. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in first page of the application. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner no. 1 is husband whereas petitioner no. 2 is mother-in-law of the complainant. It would appear from perusal of Annexure-2 to this petition that petitioners were granted privilege of anticipatory bail on 10.07.2009 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Buxar in A.B.P. No. 121 of 2009 till the disposal of regular bail in the light of a decision reported in 1999 CCR 107 K.L. Sharma Vs. State & others (SC) & 2009 BBCJ 119 Vaman Naraian Vs. State of Rajasthan (SC). Although, there is some sort of allegation of torturing as well as demand of dowry against these petitioners but submission on behalf of the petitioners is that the complainant lodged a police case in Mao district, Uttar Pradesh. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Complaint Case No. 255 C of 2005. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)