IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 15TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 26TH MAGHA 1929 OP.No. 28231 of 2002(J) ----------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ A.MEENAKSHI, G.R.A. 238, T.C.2/1553 (3), KOTTARA LANE, GOWREESAPATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-4. BY ADV. SRI.J.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, DEPUTY COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (N.C), ELECTRICAL MAJOR SECTION, KESAVADASAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SMT.SUDHEESAKUMAR, ROHINI T.C.2/1553 (8), GOWREESAPATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-4. 4. G.RAMU, VALIYAVEEDU, GOWREESAPATTOM, TRIVANDRUM-4. BY SRI.N.D.PREMACHANDRAN, SC, KSEB SRI.S.V.RAJAN SRI.MVS.NAMBOOTHIRY SRI.S.ARUN RAJ SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON CMP.NO.48131/2992 IN OP.NO.28231/2002-J. DISMISSED. 15.2.2008. Sd/- T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- P1: COPY OF THE ALTERNATE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT WITH THE SKETCH. P2: COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER. P3: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT DTD.29.8.2002 RECEIVED BY THE PETITIONER ON 30.8.2002. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. ( true copy ) P.A. TO JUDGE. kvs/- T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ========================= OP.No.28231 of 2002-J. ========================= Dated this the 15th day of February, 2008. J U D G M E N T This Original Petition is filed challenging Ext.P3 order passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram under Section 16(1) of the Indian Telegraph Act. As per the above order permission was granted to draw the line from Post No.15/5 through the route CDB as shown in the diagram as it is the most feasible and least injurious one. The objection taken by the petitioner appears to be that the line is criss-crosses her property causing great injustice to her. 2. When the case came up for hearing today the learned Standing Counsel for the Electricity Board submitted that line has been drawn on certain portion only with wire-proof material which will not cause any inconvenience, injury or hardship to the petitioner. This statement is not opposed by anybody. In the light WP(C).No.28231 of 2002-J. 2 of the above, no further orders are called for in this Original Petition and the same is closed recording the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for the Electricity Board. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. kvs/-