1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR M.C.A.NO.1061 OF 2009 IN W.P.NO.3125 OF 2008 (D) Prakash Bhauraoji Kadu and anr. ..vs.. Suresh Krishnaraoji Dhore and ors. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- C ORAM : C.L.PANGARKAR, J. DATED : 1st October, 2009. Heard Mrs.Harshada Prabhu, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr.M.R.Joharapurkar, learned counsel for the respondents. This application has been filed for review of the order passed by this court on 7th July, 2009. A writ petition was filed before this court challenging the order passed by the District Judge whereby injunction was granted in favour of the respondents. The matter was heard by this court on merits and the court found that there was no reason to interfere with the order passed by trial court. 2 The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the observations made by this court may come in the way of the appellants and therefore, this court should observe in the order that the observations of this court shall not come in the way of the learned judge of the trial court while deciding the suit. I do not think that such observations can be made here in review application.. The learned counsel for the appellants makes a request that the learned judge of the trial court be directed to decide the matter early. Such a direction cannot be given in a review application. The application is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE. Chute