IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2011 / 26TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 16106 of 2011(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- PATHROSE,VARUVILA VEEDU, KANJAMPAZHINJI THIRUPURAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURA BY ADV. SMT.VIJAYAKUMARI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. R.D.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 3. THAHASILDAR (REVENUE) TALUK OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION, NEYYATTINKARA-695121 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PARASUVAKKAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695508 GP SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 16106 of 2011 EXHIBITS EXT.P1- COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.1888/10 DATED 23.9.10 EXT.P2- COPY OF NOTICE DATED 11.1.11 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PARASUVAKKAL EXT.P3- COPY OF PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RDO, TVM DATED 10.3.11 (true copy) P.A. To Judge P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).16106/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 16th day of June, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers. (i). Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction, quashing Ext.P2 Notice. (ii). To declare that Ext.P2 notice and the actions pursuant to it are arbitrary, unjust and opposed to the principles of natural justice. (ii). To direct the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P3 Review Petition on merits and disposed it expeditiously. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is given to the second respondent/RDO to consider Ext.P3 and pass appropriate orders thereon. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 4. In view of the limited nature of the relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to go into the facts and figures. W.P.(C).16106/2011 2 The writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the second respondent to consider Ext.P3 and pass appropriate orders thereon, of course after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition before the second respondent for compliance. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, Judge mrcs