IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 2099 of 2010 (M/S) Om Prakash S/o Late Sri Anil Prasad … Petitioner Versus Uttarakhand Information Commission and one another .. Respondents Mr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1. (Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J.) Heard Mr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the respondent No.1. By means of this petition the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 24-09- 2010, passed by respondent no.1. Perusal of impugned order, Annexure No.4 to the writ petition shows that the Information Commissioner in para-6 has given direction to the petitioner to supply the details of moveable and immoveable property and information about the option given by the petitioner when the State was re-organized. The petitioner has filed this writ petition on the ground that the information directed to be supplied by the petitioner is highly personal and the information sought by the applicant relates to the details of moveable and immoveable property of the petitioner as well as his dependents. But, the Information Commissioner has directed the petitioner only to give the details of his moveable and immoveable property and about the option exercised by him at the time of re- organization of the State. This Court is of the view that these informations are not personal in nature because the petitioner is a government servant and it is obligatory on his part to furnish the details of his moveable and immoveable property to the Government, as per Government Order as well as under the provision of Rule- 22 of Uttarakhand Employees Service Conducts Rules, 2002. 2 I find no illegality in the impugned order passed by the Information Commissioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed in limine. Dated: 13-12-2010 (B.S. Verma, J. ) ISB