1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REV. APPLICATION NO.230 OF 2006 Altaf Yusuf Ali Mukadam .. Applicant Versus Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents Taraq K. Sayed for applicant Mr.R.Y.Mirza for respondent No.1 Mr.S.S.Pednekar, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 10th November 2006. P.C. . Learned Advocate appearing for applicant 2 states that office objections will be complied with within Ten days from today. 2. In the light of this statement and for the reasons set out in the application, delay in filing restoration application for seeking restoration of revision application, which is dismissed in default, is condoned and the Revision Application is restored to file. 3. Explanation for not being able to comply with the office objections within time is accepted. Criminal Revision Application No.549 of 2002 is restored to file. However, applicant to pay cost quantified at Rs.1000/- to Maharashtra Legal Aid Authority within the period in which office objections are to be complied with. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)