cwp1026.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1026 OF 2010 1) Smt. Ushabai Maroti Mehetre, R/o- Prabhat Nagar, Nanded and others. ...PETITIONERS. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra (through Home Secretary, Govt. of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, Mumbai) and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri. V.C. Dharurkar Advocate h/f. Shri. Gunratan Sadavarte Advocate for Petitioner. Smt. R.K. Ladda, A.P.P. for Respondent. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATE : 23RD MARCH, 2011. cwp1026.10 2 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for respective parties. 2. The Petitioner No.1 submits that her husband Maroti Mehetre was murdered on 10th August, 2010. The police were not carrying out investigation properly. The Petitioner alleged that Police Constable attached to Bhagyanagar Police Station, Nanded, at the relevant time, demanded money from the Petitioner for investing the matter. The counsel further submits that Petitioner is a poor, illiterate lady. The complaint was filed to Superintendent of Police dated 31st August, 2010 but inspite of the same, no action was taken against the said police. 3. Consequent to issuance of notice, Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 filed affidavit in reply. cwp1026.10 3 The learned A.P.P., based on reply and instructions received, submits that charge sheet has been filed in connection with Crime No.210 of 2010, registered at Bhagyanagar Police Station. 4. The learned A.P.P. further submits that in respect of allegations made by the Petitioner, enquiry was conducted, report came to be filed in this regard, copy of the same is annexed at Exhibit R-4. 5. The learned counsel for Petitioner submits that Petitioner is not satisfied with the reply filed and the enquiry conducted. The enquiry was not conducted fairly. The counsel prays that direction be issued to lodge cases against the Respondents concerned. 6. Considering the material placed on record, in exercise of our extra ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution cwp1026.10 4 of India, we are not inclined to issue such directions as prayed by the Petitioner. 7. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to resort to alternate remedies as permissible in law. The Writ Petition stands disposed of. [T.V. NALAWADE, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/MAR11/cwp1026.10