HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA C.M.A.NO.892 OF 1996 Dt.1.6.2010 Between: Satyaprakash Sharma ..Appellant And Santosh Sharma ..Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA C.M.A.NO.892 OF 1996 ORDER: (Per Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) When the matter was taken up for hearing on yesterday, neither the appellant nor his counsel were present and there was no representation on their behalf. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal.’ This Court passed orders on 9.7.2008 and 31.5.2010 as follows: “Heard the learned counsel for appellant. Though served none appeared for the respondent-wife. During the course of arguments, it has been submitted by the learned counsel for appellant that the respondent-wife has already got married, which is a new circumstances to be taken into consideration for disposal of the matter on merits. Hence, we deem it appropriate that the matter needs conciliation and refer the same to the Secretary, A.P.High Court Legal Services Committee. Pursuant to the orders passed by this Court on 9.7.2008, the matter was referred to the A.P.High Court Legal Services Committee and in turn the Committee sent five notices to both the parties on 9.2.2010, 9.3.2010, 20.3.2010, 6.4.2010 and 24.4.2010. But, both the parties did not appear before the Legal Services Committee. When the matter is taken up today for hearing, none appears. Post for dismissal on 1.6.2010” Even today also, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, none appears for the appellant and there is no representation on his behalf. In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. __________________ B.N.RAO NALLA, J. 1.6.2010 kpr