]IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.R.No.2236 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 16, 2010 Kapil Dev Singh .....Petitioner v. Smt.Mridula Shekhawat and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Sanjay Vij, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present revision petition has been filed against order dated 13.5.2010, passed by learned District Judge, Family Court, Gurgaon, vide which the present revision-petitioner has been directed to pay Rs.15,000/- per month as interim maintenance, during the pendency of the main petition for maintenance of both the respondents, i.e., wife and daughter of the petitioner. Heard. Relationship is not disputed. There is no dispute that the present petitioner is highly qualified and he used to get salary of Rs.1,25,000/- per month and however, now after leaving the job, he is doing his own business. Hence, he must be having sufficient income to maintain the respondents. Though respondents demanded Rs.45,000/- per month as interim maintenance, however, learned District Judge, Family Court, Gurgaon, has allowed only Rs.15,000/- per month maintenance besides educational expenses of respondent no.2. Hence, in view of these facts, no interference in the impugned order is called for. It cannot be said that the impugned order is in any way illegal or erroneous. There is no merit in the present revision petition. The same is, hereby, dismissed. 16.8.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge