IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1883 of 2009 Date of decision: 6.05.2009. Naresh Singh Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. S.S.Khurana, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. It is apparent from the record that though the petitioner did avail of number of opportunities to adduce his evidence, the impugned closure of evidence was inappropriate because the petitioner had already applied for the summoning of certain official witnesses. On account of filing of process fee (and depositing of diet money in time) it was for the learned Trial Court to issue appropriate process for the presence of those witnesses. In the light thereof, the petition shall stand allowed subject to payment of Rs.5000/- as costs. The petitioner shall be allowed one opportunity to conclude his evidence. May 06, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge