IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-13829 of 2011 Date of Decision: May 10, 2011 Sandeep @ Bhanja . ….Petitioner Versus State of Haryana. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Bijender Dhankhar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that after the dismissal of the bail application by this Court vide order dated 16.03.2011, two material prosecution witnesses were examined, however, both of them have not supported the prosecution story and have been declared hostile. He has further stated that since material witnesses have not supported prosecution story, therefore, petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail in view of Section 437(7) of the Code Crl.M.No.M-13829 of 2011 of Criminal Procedure. He has fairly stated that he shall move application before the learned Trial Court under Section 437(7) of the Code, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition. Present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. In the event of moving bail application, the same shall be decided in accordance with law at its own merit, without being prejudice from the rejection of the bail application by this Court. May 10, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2