Crl. Rev. No.318 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Rev. No.318 of 2011 Date of Decision: 07.02.2011 Narinder Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Vivek Suri, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a revision petition against the order dated 17.01.2011 passed by Special Judge, Patiala, vide which, an application for modifying the charge sheet has been dismissed. It is contended that earlier the challan was filed alleging that the petitioner possessed disproportionate assets to the tune of `1,76,235.76 ps. However, subsequently the supplementary challan was filed stating that the disproportionate assets were reduced to ` 47,235.75 ps. The said application was dismissed vide order dated 17.01.2011 by observing that the prosecution has already concluded the evidence. The case is at the final stage and the charge has already been framed. The detail of income and expenditure and disproportionate assets, if any, is to be worked out on the basis of evidence already adduced on record. In view of the above, there is no ground to interfere in the well Crl. Rev. No.318 of 2011 2 reasoned judgment passed by Special Judge, Patiala vide his order dated 17.01.2011. Nevertheless, it goes without saying that the trial Court shall take into consideration the supplementary challan at the time of final arguments which will be co-related with the evidence before it. Disposed of as above. Order dasti. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 07.02.2011 JUDGE gurpreet