THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO :19372 of 2009 DATED: 06-10-2009 Between: SVS Cable Network, A sole Proprietary concern, Having its office at 2nd floor, Gurukrupa Complex, R.R.Road,Chirala, Rep.,by its sole Proprietor, K.Srinivasa Rao. ..... PETITIONER And The Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District & 3 others. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: Petitioner approached this Court and filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is humbly prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to issue a writ, direction or order especially in the nature of writ of Mandamus holding that the action of the respondents in preventing the petitioner from carrying on its business at the instance of rival cable operators as being illegal, arbitrary, unlawful and violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and directing the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner’s business or in any manner prevent the petitioner from carrying on the business of supplying cable signals in the town of Chirala, Prakasam District and pass such other order or orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case”. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents. 3. On 14-09-2009, this Court while ordering notice before admission, passed an order restraining the respondents from interfering with the petitioner’s business, at the instance of his rival cable operators, and if it is needed, the respondent-police officials may proceed further in accordance with the established procedure under law. 4. Today, when this matter is taken up the learned Government Pleader submits that a case in Cr.No.239 of 2009 was registered against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957. 5. In the light of the subsequent development, this Court is of the view that no further orders need be passed. While continuing the said interim order, the respondents may proceed further in accordance with the procedure provided for under the Code of Criminal Procedure. 6. Accordingly, Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ T.GOPALAKRISHNA,J 06th October, 2009. Tsy