HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5006 OF 2007 Date:08-07-2010 Between: G. Mahesh Goud S/o. Ramulu Goud and others …. Petitioners AND G. Ramulu Goud S/o. Pedda Balaiah and others …. Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5006 OF 2007 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioners – plaintiffs against order dated 02-01-2007 in I.A. No.668 of 2006 in I.A. No.427 of 2003 in O.S. No.188 of 1994 of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar, a petition under Order VI, Rule 17 C.P.C., for correction in the Preliminary Decree dated 31-07-2000 passed in the above suit. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The contention of the petitioners is that prior to passing of the preliminary decree, a petition for amendment was allowed; and in the preliminary decree a clerical error was crept in and for correction of that error, they filed the impugned petition. Respondents filed counter affidavits denying the allegations and prayed for dismissal of the petition. 4. The trial Court, on hearing both sides, dismissed the impugned petition observing that there is no specific mention in the preliminary decree about the sketches, which the petitioners now want to include in the preliminary decree by way of correction and that the preliminary decree was passed long back and therefore, the question of entertaining such petition does not arise. Hence, this revision is filed. 5. Having heard the learned counsel for both sides and on perusal of the material on record, in a preliminary decree which was passed long back, an application for correction of a clerical error in the preliminary decree in view of the application for amendment which was allowed prior to the passing of such preliminary decree, would not entitle a party to seek correction of such clerical error, as that decree has become final. Admittedly, no appeal is filed against the said judgment and preliminary decree. In the circumstances, there are no grounds in this revision. 6. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J July 08, 2010 KTL