1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3853/2009 (Rajendra Kanwalada & ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & ors.) Date of order :: 24th April 2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr.B.M.Bohra ) Mr.D.L.R.Vyas) for the petitioners Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and having perused the material placed on record, this Court is unable to find any reason to consider issuance of any writ, order or direction in this matter at this stage; and this petition could only be dismissed as premature and bereft of cause of action. The petitioners have filed this writ petition essentially with the submissions that a mining lease covering an area of about 10 sq. kms. was granted in favour of the respondent No.4; and such mining lease area comprises of their khatedari land too. According to the petitioners, the period of said lease as earlier granted has expired and the respondent No.4 has moved the application for renewal. The petitioners have averred that no mining operations could be permitted on the mining lease so far it comprises of their khatedari land; and that neither at the time of granting of the mining lease in question nor even at the time of filing of renewal application, 2 their consent was ever obtained. The petitioners have further averred that they have already stated their objections to the authorities concerned. The petitioners have stated their so-called apprehension in the manner that the respondents are going to renew the disputed mining lease under the pressure of the respondent No.4 while ignoring their objections. According to the petitioners, the respondent No.4 somehow wants to get the mining lease renewed even in their khatedari land without their consent. There appears hardly any basis for such an apprehension on the part of the petitioners for it cannot be assumed that the authorities while dealing with renewal of mining lease would be acting beyond or contrary to law. As per the averments taken in the writ petition, the matter of renewal of mining lease is pending with the authorities concerned. Unless the authorities have taken a specific decision on such renewal application, no cause of action could be said to be available to the petitioners. The apprehension suggested in the petition is without any rhyme or basis. The petition as framed and at the present stage could only be considered as premature and is, therefore, rejected. 3 MK (DINESH MAHESHWARI),J.