@) H16H COURTQF CHHATTISGARHAT BtLASM^R vwwrpEnnoN7silMa^2lof;mT PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Smt. Indira Shukla, W/o Shri Harlshanlcar ShuMa, aged about 39 years, R/o Naila, Janjgir (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Stete of ChhsdUsgartt, Through Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Kiawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director af Publte Pensionbada, Raipur (C.G.) Insfruotton, WR1T PETmON UNDER ARTICI-E 226 OF THE CONST1TUTION OF tNDW\ SingteBench : Hon'ble Mr. Justlce Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Mr. Kumaresh Thwari, Advecate for the petltioner. Mr. Arvind Dubey, fanel lawyer for ttie r^pondents/Stata. Bablu CTtDER (Passed on 13ttl day of June, 2 7) Learned counsel appeartng fer the peSUoner as well as for the State/respondmits jointly sutmiit ttiat the fact and quesBon of law involved in the present writ petfUon are tte same to that of in Yashwant Kumar BharadwaJ Vs. Municipal Corporatton, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which tas been di^aosed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. Accordingly, the writ petition is altowed in tenns of the erder ^ssed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subjed to verificatlwi of the fact as to whether the petiUoner has acquired B.Ed. ExaminaUon Certificate on her own expenses as per the circuteis dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether she has been pakl two achrance increments or not. No order as to costs. i sd/- 1 Satish K. Agnihotri Judge