IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2300 OF 2008 Sunil Gulab Jagtap and others ... Petitioners Vs The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Districts and others. ... Respondents Mr. Susheel Mahadeshwar i/by Ms. R.J. Todankar for the petitioners. Ms. Lopa Munim i/by M/s. Rajesh Kothari & Co. for the respondent No.2. Mr. K.S. Patil for the respondent No.3. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., & S.A. BOBDE , J. DATE : 7TH OCTOBER , 2008 P.C.: We have earlier directed the learned counsel for the respondent No.2 to take instructions. Today she prays for further time. We have no reason to decline her request. 2. Prayer made in the present writ petition cannot be granted as stated. However, the claim of the petitioners would have to be covered by the Division Bench judgment of this court in Writ Petition No.563 of 2007 decided on 21st June, 2007 (Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi v. Security Guards Board for Gr. Bombay and Thane Dist. and others). 3. Writ petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid Division Bench judgment of this court. Respondents shall take appropriate steps and decisions within time stipulated in the aforesaid judgment, commencing with effect from today. Writ petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. Parties concerned may take any alternative remedy available to them in law. CHIEF JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE, J.