-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1875 OF 2007 Gangaram V. Kadam and others ... Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents Mr. M. J. Jamdar for the petitioner. Ms. A.K. Savla for the Corporation. Ms. Asha Bhambwani for the MMRDA. Ms. S. Sreedharan, Assistant Government Pleader, for the State. Mr. S.P. Thorat for respondent No.3. Mr. S. P. Kadam, instructed by M/s. Kadam & Co., for respondent No.15. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & V.M . KANADE, J. DATE: APRIL 04, 2008. P.C. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that as far as prayer clause (b) is concerned, the averments made in the writ petition would be considered and if on examination anything is found, the State will act in accordance with law. -2- 3. In relation to other reliefs claimed in the petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wishes to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appropriate representation before the High Power Committee constituted by the State in view of the Full Bench judgment of this Court. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Representation be filed before the Committee within four weeks from today. Respondent No.1 will abide by the statement made in Court today. CHIEF JUSTICE V.M. KANADE, J.