1 lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6723 OF 2009 Sharad Educational Institute : Petitioner. Versus State of Maharshtra & ors. : Respondents. Ms. Kumud Bhatia for the Petitioner Mr V P Malvankar, AGP, for Respondent No.2. Mr Rajiv Chavan a/w Mr R Lokhande, Mr S D Bhosale for Respondent No.5 Mr Nitin Patil a/w Mr U P Warunjikar for Respondent No.4. CORAM : S B MHASE & R M SAVANT, JJ. DATE : 4th August 2009 P.C. 1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. 2. This Petition is similar to the group of the Petitions which have been decided along with Writ Petition No.5884 of 2009. In the present petition and the above referred group of Petitions, the Petitioners have prayed for getting permission and affiliation from the State Government and the concerned authorities since the NCTE has granted 2 permission in their favour. For the reasons stated in the judgment delivered in Writ Petition No.5884 of 2009 and companion matters, this Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause 32(a) which reads thus :- “32.(a) That a writ of certiorari, writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order of direction be issued calling for the records of Petitioner’s case and after examining the propriety and legality of the action of Respondents, this Hon’ble Court be please to direct the Respondent No.1 to immediately grant their Resolution for permitting the Petitioner to commence the B.Ed. Course during the academic year 2009-10 and further direct the Respondent No.2 to grant approval to the Petitioner Institution to admit the students for B.Ed Course during the academic year 2009-10 in pursuance to the approval granted by NCTE order dated 22.11.2008.” Rule is accordingly made absolute. [R.M.SAVANT, J] [S.B.MHASE, J]