IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.16031 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : APRIL 19, 2011 AJIT SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Ishwar Lal, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. A.K. Sharma, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. JS Toor, Advocate, for respondents No.3 to 7. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 Ajit Singh (petitioner) and Gian Singh, Ram Parkash, Amar Singh, Gurdip Singh and Darshan Singh (respondents No.3 to 6 and 8, respectively), as identified by their respective counsel, are present in Court. 2 On 27.1.2011, the following order was passed:- “Learned counsel for the parties contend that the disputes between the parties have been settled. Learned counsel further states that the terms of partition drawn and as settled between the parties would be drawn and presented before the Tehsildar for giving sanction and making entries in the revenue record. Adjourned to 28.02.2011.” 3 Learned counsel for the parties have placed on record of the court a document viz. compromise deed, which is taken on Civil Writ Petition No.16031 of 2009 2 record as Annexure P-12, along with its translated copy as Annexure P-12/A. The compromise deed is signed by the parties. 4 Learned counsel for the parties contend that in view of the above, order dated 31.12.2001 (Annexure P-7) be modified in terms of the compromise (Annexure P-12). 5 Ordered accordingly. 6 Tehsildar, Patiala, is directed to make relevant entries in the revenue record, in terms of compromise (Annexure P-12). 7 The petition stands disposed of. April 19, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?