IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2011 / 10TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23774 of 2011(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- REVATHY A.R., D/O.RAVEENDRAN, AGED 21 YEARS, 'THRIKARTHIKA', KUNNAMBATH HOUSE, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, RAMANATTUKARA, KOZHIKODE-673633. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSTIY, RAMANATTUKARA, KOZHIKODE-673633. SC SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/09/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 23774 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION DATED 22.8.11 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF THE PAYMENT RECEIPT DATED 22.8.11 FOR REVALUATION APPLICATION (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).23774/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 1st day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioner applied for revaluation of 8th semester B.Tech Engineering Examination vide Ext.P1 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the second respondent to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within ten weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. 4.Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs