1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1775 OF 2006 IN APPEAL (LODG.) NO.361 OF 2006 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2356 OF 2003 IN SUIT NO.1961 OF 1997 Metal Distributors (UK) Ltd. ..Appellant. Vs. Ramesh Tandon & anr. ..Respondents. .... Shri Dilip A. Taur i/b K. Ashar & Co. for the Appellant. None for the Respondents. .... CORAM: R. M. S. KHANDEPARKAR, & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ. 31st January, 2007. P.C. : Heard the learned advocate for the Appellant. None present for the Respondent. Considering the facts disclosed in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, delay of eight days has been sufficiently justified. The same is condoned and the Appeal is directed to be 2 registered and placed for hearing on admission after completion of the registration formalities. The Notice of Motion is made absolute accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. (R. M. S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)