@@ w l$ $ingle Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. C No.3553 201 1 ~\ / PETITIONER : Vimal Dutt, S/o Sunil Chandra Dutt, aged about 53 years, R/o near Labour Union Offlcer, Raigarh Jute Mill, Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1) (Municipal Corporation, Rajgarh, Through its Commissioner Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 2) /Collector, Rajgarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ; WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS, ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION [DIRECTIONS ETC. RESPONDENTS Municipal Corporation, Raigarh & Another (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Ms. Hamida $iddiqui. Advocate for the petitioner. Shri H.B.Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Sareena Khan, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Dy. Advocate General for the State. ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 28 day of November. 201 1) 1. At the very outset, Shri Agrawal, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 and Shri Murthy. learned counsel appearing for the State/respondent No.2, submit that no steps for demolishing the structure on the land in question shall be taken without attording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Since no notices have been issued till date, thus, at this stage, it is not necessary to go into further facts of the case. 2. However, it is made clear that the respondent authorities shall not demolish any structure without aEording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition sands disposed of with the aforesaid aShOK observations and direction. Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 3553 OF 2011 PETITIONER Vimal Dutt Versus