IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38157 of 2009 1. RAJ KISHORE SAHANI 2. NAND LAL SAHANI @ NANDU SAHANI. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 27.11.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioners have approached this court seeking anticipatory bail under diverse sections of Indian Penal Code including Section 302 IPC. Learned counsel, referring to the F.I.R., states that the injured is the informant. He has described vividly the occurrence and has named as many as 20 accused persons. Subsequent to the filing of the F.I.R., the prosecution is making an effort to implicate few more accused persons in the alleged offence including the petitioners herein. Referring to the order of this court dated 20.7.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 20311 of 2009 (Annexure-2), it is submitted that considering the said aspect of the matter, some of the similarly placed co-accuseds have been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant is not in a position to dispute the aforesaid submission. This court , having regard to the fact that some of the similarly placed co-accuseds have been released on anticipatory bail, is inclined to extend the same privilege to the petitioners. In the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, In the facts and circumstances of 2 the case, let petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., West, Muzaffarpur in connection with Paroo P.S. case no. 190 of 2008 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )