IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.7606-M of 2007 Date of decision: February 6, 2007. Ravinder ...Petitioner(s) v. State of Haryana & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest. Present: Shri Surinder Singh Siao, Advocate for the petitioner. ORDER The petitioner, who is a life convict, alleges that his application for the grant of parole for house repair submitted through the Gram Panchayat of his village is not being accepted by the Superintendent of District Jail, Gurgaon. There appears to be per-se no illegality in the action of respondent No.2 as the application has to be moved by the petitioner though he can rely upon the resolution/report, if any, given by the Gram Panchayat in his favour. Consequently, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an application to the Superintendent, District Jail, Gurgaon along with a report of the Gram Panchayat and if any such application is moved by the petitioner, the Superintendent, District Jail, Gurgaon is directed to look into the same, in accordance with government policy, and if he is satisfied with regard to the genuineness of the petitioner's request, to recommend the same to the competent authority for appropriate orders. The needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Disposed of. February 6, 2007. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge