IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2010 / 19TH JYAISTHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1066 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.7261/2007 ................................................ PETITIONER: --------------- DR.K.SARALA DEVI, W/O. C.N. GOPINATHAN, AGED 62 YEARS, LECTURER, RASTHRIYA SANSKRIT SANSTHAN(DEEMED UNIVERSITY), GURUFVAYOOR GAMPUS, PURANATTUKARA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, RESIDING KEERTHANA, DR. V.K. NARAYANA MENON ROAD, THRISSUR- 680 005. BY ADVS. MR.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY MRS.N.SANTHA MR.PETER JOSE CHRISTO MR.S.A.ANAND RESPONDENT: --------------- C.S. KANNIYAL, REGISTRAR IN CHARGE, RASTRIYA SANSKRIT, SANSATHAN (DEEMED UNIVERSITY), 56-57 INSTITUTIONAL AREA, JANAKAPURI, NEW DELHI, PIN 110 058, ADVS. MR.KRB.KAIMAL, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R1 MR.N.M.MADHU,SC,RASHTRIYA SANKRI SD UT FOR R1 MR.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN,ASST.SOLICITOR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------------ Contempt Case(C) No. 1066 OF 2009 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of JUNE, 2010 J U D G M E N T In view of the fact that the directions in the judgment have been substantially complied with, I do not think it necessary to continue proceedings in the contempt case. However, it would be open to the petitioner to agitate further claims, if any, appropriately. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed without prejudice to the above right of the petitioner. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd