f-.. HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTRiGARH SINGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ. WRIT PETITION N0.1618 OK 2006 PETITIONER Smt. Lata Tiwari, W/o Basant Thi/ari, fioed about 45 years, R/o Hathni Para, Sheetal Mandir, Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) Vs. RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, DepartmentofHome, D.K.S. Buildtng, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhatttegarh. 2. Director General of Police, Police Headquarters, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Superintendent of Pofice Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. State House Officer, Police Station Hirri, DistrictBUaspur (C.G.) Present: Mr. B.D. Guru, teamed counsel forthe petftioner. Mr. Sanjay S. Agrawal, learned G.A., for ttie State <rf C.Q. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 5"' AprU, 2006) The crux of the allegation is that two brothers of the petttioner are implicated In a erime without any basls. It is stated that a representation is made by the petitioner to the Chief Minister of the State, which has been fbwarcted to the third respondent, Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur, wffii a direction to look into the complaint of the petitioner, but, no adion has been taken by the third respondent. If the brothers of the petitioner without any basis have been implicated in a crime, the brothers of the petltioner or the petitioner can work out legal remedies provided under the Code of Criminat Procedure. In the conte)d of the case, the relief sought in this writ petitfon cannot be granted. The writ petition 1s, therefore, dlsmissed. ,- Sd/- Chief Justice <;^- ^'