IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17273 of 2011 Shiv Kumar Yadav @ Lala Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 4. 30.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant brother’s power tiller was stolen away. Subsequently the same was recovered from cattle shed of the petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that one Guddu Kumar gave his confessional statement that he actually committed theft of power tiller and sold it to this petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner is bonafide purchaser from Guddu Kumar on payment of Rs. 81,000/- and he was not aware about the power tiller being stolen property, moreover the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender 2 before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Pandarak P.S. Case No. 09 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Pandarak, Barh, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)