IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2010 / 2ND ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 19581 of 2010(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MUNEER V.P S/O.MAMMED, AGED 25 YEARS, FULL-TIME URDU TEACHER, VALLIAYI U.P.SCHOOL, PO.MUTHIYANGA, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT ANNEX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PANOOR PO,PANOOR, KANNUR DISTRICT-670 692. 4. THE MANAGER, VALLIAYI U.P.SCHOOL, PO.MUDIYANGA, KANNUR DISTRICT-670 691. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.DILIP MOHAN FOR R1 TO R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 19581 of 2010 W ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner was appointed as a Full Time Urdu Teacher as per Ext.P1 order dated 02-06-2008 in the fourth respondent's School. However, the said appointment of the petitioner was approved only as a Part Time Urdu Teacher. The petitioner was actually appointed against the retirement vacancy of Sri.Ahammedkutty, who retired from service as a Full Time Urdu Teacher. The Full Time Urdu Teacher's post was sanctioned to the said school by virtue of 'Group C' diversion. Therefore, according to the petitioner, by virtue of Ext.P3 Government Order dated 13-11-2000, the petitioner is entitled to get his appointment approved as Full Time Urdu Teacher. In the said circumstances, the petitioner has approached the second respondent raising grievances against the approval as Part Time Urdu Teacher. However, the second respondent, as per Ext.P5, rejected the said claim of the petitioner. Feeling aggrieved by Ext.P5, the matter was taken in revision before the Government through Ext.P8. Ext.P8 is now pending before the first respondent. WPC.19581/2010 : 2 : In the aforesaid circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P8 revision petition filed by the petitioner, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, with notice to the petitioner and the fourth respondent, in the light of Ext.P3 Government Order. Sd/- (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge