FARAD CONTINUTION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Revision Appln no l of 2006 -------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office Court or Judge’s Order Memorandum of Coram appearence,Court’s Orders & Directors and Registrar’s Order --------------------------------------------------- Mr T D Deshmukh for applicants CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. DATED l6.l.2006 DATED l6.l.2006 DATED l6.l.2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The learned counsel for the applicants fairly states that in view of the amended provisions the remedy of revision is not available to the applicants against the impugned order. He submits that the applicants may be permitted to convert the present proceedings into a civil writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution. Even if that request was to be granted, I see no purpose would be served in permitting the applicants to convert the present proceedings into a writ petition for the simple reason that the order impugned is an interlocutory order and passed as back as in l997. The suit is pending since l997. Instead the trial court may be well advised to expedite the hearing of the suit. With these observations revision is disposed of.