1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application (CAO) No. 271 of 2010 in M.C.A. (St.) No. 3747 of 2010 in A.O. No. 77 of 2004 (D) (Union of India ..vs.. Smt. Parvatibai Wd/o Baban Sontakke and others) =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- None for the applicant. Mr. S.K.Sable, Advocate for the respondents. C ORAM : Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota, J. DATED : 26th February, 2010. None for the applicant. The civil application for condonation of delay is dismissed for default. In view of dismissal of the civil application, the M.C.A.. (St.) No. 3747/10 does not survive. The same is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE. LATERON Mr. N.P.Lambat, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. S.K.Sable, Advocate for Respondents. On the oral application of Mr. Lambat, the learned counsel for the applicant, the civil application and M.C.A. are restored to file. This application is taken out for condonation of 2 delay in filing an application for restoration of appeal from order, which was dismissed on 04/1/2010. The learned counsel for the applicant states that due to inadvertence the matter was not noticed on board and the learned counsel also did not come to know about the dismissal of the appeal until 16th February, 2010, when the application filed by the respondent was placed on the board. Respondent do not oppose the application. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed. Office to place the restoration application on board. Stand over to 12th March, 2010. JUDGE Diwale