IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.537 of 2007 SUBASH CHANDRA PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6 24.2.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. In the instant writ application the petitioner prays for quashing the Kotwali ( Adampur) P.S.Case No.272/07 under sections 468,471,181 and 420 of the I.P.C. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent authorities were biased with the petitioner and were not considering his application for grant of licence of a pistol. He filed writ application being C.W.J.C. No.2998/02 which was disposed of by order dated 8.11.2003 with direction to the authority to take decision within three months. The petitioner states that he had filed complaint case no.1094/97 under section 307 of the I.P.C. against the accused persons. In aforesaid case summons have been issued. However, warrant has not being executed on account of connivance, as alleged. This Court by order dated 29.5.2006 directed to ensure execution of warrant against accused persons of complaint case. The learned counsel for the State submits that charge sheet has already been submitted in this case in which petitioner is accused. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge sheet is incomplete and the same has been filed without recording statement of any material witness. It will be open to the petitioner to challenge the charge 2 sheet and further prosecution. With the aforesaid direction this writ application is disposed of. Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)