&/ 6v” IN THE HIH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.P. N0$2920f 2003 / SHIVCHARAN PATEL, SON OF LATE RAGHUNATH PATEL, f AGED 53 YEARS, RESIDENT OF MAHALPARA, SARAIPALI, DISTT. MAHASAMUND. ?§’”ETITIONER VERSUS 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINSTRY I OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, MAHASAMUND. RESPONDENT RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION 'OF INDIA FOR THE g‘g‘ ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE \OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI AND/OR ORDER(S), AND/OR DIRECTION(S)’ IN THE NATURE OF WRITS The humble petition ofthe Petitioner above named: MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH (1) PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: G / W g 's\ XI-HC-22 , $5.122993 P€titi031€r by Shri BP. S1: Rasimndsnts/ Stat€ by Aévocaw. By this Writ Petition 1 Censtitutiea of India th€ P€tit dated 027, 10.20()3 Annex-um Pl been irailsferred from Gove‘ Sécondary School, Saraipali to Office, 'Amhékapur, Sarg‘uja. The petitionof’s caS€ i: Ascomltaot in tho Govt. Ad School, Saraipali. H6 was faithfully arid diligontly. All of $eSsion, the respondentfAu petitioner on 0710,2003 iron District Education Ooicer, Petitioner’s main challenge is ‘who cannot b6 transfa‘red arma, Advocate. Shri Ranbir Singh, Govt, mdei‘ Article 226/227 of the .011e1“ has challenged “the order f 1 byvwhich the pefitioner has miment Adérsh‘, Boys Higher the o$ce of District Education ; that he is working as an arsh Boys Higher Secondary performing his duties with a sudden during mid academic :hority has; transferred the . Saraipali to theofdce of the The at he iS a Class—III employee, oni one dietrict to another egulations made by the Govt. _ issible under the law. Arabikapur, V Sarguja. .1 r district. As per the Rules and inter district transfer is not pe I have heard the learned ounsel for the party ma? = U WWmW @ 3a W, m, mm; am m mimngzagéiwia m WW wW WWW $armm Learneci c0u11se1 fof the #aiticnez‘ submits that tkm - petitioner may 136 allowed tQ I make a representatian to Rasspondent No. 1 am}. the Res 1d€nt No. 1 may be dirséted to d€cidc the same, far which 16 i16<i Govt. Aavacate has no objecticm. E“ Havmg heard the Immed (201211561 for 1:116 parties wld having regard to the facts and C' ‘cumstancee Gf the caee, the petitioner is aHGWed to make 1‘ pi‘esentatien to Respondent No. 1, mieing all his grievanc Within a period of 10 daye {Tom tcxiay and. £31 turn the. Res ondeut No. 1 will decide the replesentaiion of ihe petitioner eidering all hie grievances Within another period of 30 day from the date of receipt of the representation by passing a asoned order. if the petitioner is not ah ady reiieved, he should not ‘oe/ relieved till the represen tion is decided r by the Respondent No. 1. With the allove observat s this oetition is decided finally. The parties are entitled for certified copy of this Older. Sdl- L_C.BHM309, Judge \. I I l WeW p 1 e n i n