? 1#$- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C . 93612011 & Crl. M.A. No. 350012011 (Delay) SLTNIL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Kartar Singh, Advocate with Petitioners in person. versus STATE & ORS ..... ResPondents Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State with SI Ram Niwas, CAW Cell, North East. Mr. Santosh Kurnar, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 with ResPondent No. 2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER 05.05.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 199/2008 under Sections 498Al406134IPC registered at PS Seelampur, Delht. The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Santosh is present in person. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. I and Respondent No. 2/Complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent 5tl' October, 2010. As fulI and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2,the Petitioner No. I has to pay T1.20 lakhs out of which tl lakh has already been paid to her and CRL.M.C. 936/2011 Page I of 2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified \\A \ {20,000/- have been paid to her in cash today in Court. She further states \ that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between thern, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 19912008 under Sections 498N406134 IPC registered at PS Seelampur, Delhi and proceedings pursuatrt thereto are hereby quashed. Parties, who have been duly identified by their respective counsels and the Investigating Officer, have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements before this Court. The petition and the pending application are disposed of. Order dasti. wh/r& //' ' 0 t " MUKTA GUPTA, J. MAY 05, 2011 / Q-/3F//2a)3 Page 2 of 2 @:;#" 4 s:Jqn.eP-2 '.c. 936/2011