1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.682 OF 1994. Vithal Krushnaji Zade .vs. The Education Officer (Sec.), Z.P.,Yavatmal. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. Mr.Adgokar, A.G.P. for respondent no.1. Mr.H.K.Pande, Adv. for respondent no.2. Coram: ANOOP V. MOHTA and C. L. PANGARKAR, JJ. Dated : 1st SEPTEMBER, 2008. None for the petitioner. In view of para no.6 of return filed by respondent no.1 which is reproduced as under, “Considering the facts and circumstances already mentioned in the foregoing paras, although it is crystal clear that the petitioner has been given all the financial 2 benefits and claims from the date from which he was given approval and he has actually worked on promotion as Sr.Clerk, it remains nothing.” we are of the view that there is nothing survived in the petition. It is dismissed accordingly. JUDGE. JUDGE. chute