IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7080 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 7080 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 7080 OF 2005 Shri Govind Trimbak Karve & ors. ... Petitioners V/s Deputy Registrar, Co-op. Societies, Pune & ors. ... Respondents Mr. A.S. Desai for the petitioners. Ms. Vaidehi Mhaispurkar, A.G.P. for Resp.Nos.1, 2 & 4. Mr. P.S. Dani for the respondent Nos. 5 to 7. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATED: 22ND NOV., 2005 DATED: 22ND NOV., 2005 DATED: 22ND NOV., 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. The present petition is filed challenging the order by which the applicants were allowed to be added as party respondents in revision application before the Divl. Joint Registrar, Co-op. Societies, Pune, in Appeal No. 46 of 2003. The only ground is that the applicants are not the members of the Society and thus not a necessary or proper party to the liquidation proceedings. Reliance is placed by the petitioner on the order passed in Writ Petition No. 4528 of 2003 dated 23.2.2005. In the present case, the applicants 2 are claiming that they are interested in the property as they are purchasers of the society’s property. In my opinion, if they are purchasers and having interest in the property of the Society, then they are necessary party in the liquidation proceedings. In any event it is purely an inter-locutory order and does not call for any interference under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India. 2. Petition fails and stands dismissed accordingly with no order as to costs. .....