1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 68/2010 IN APPEAL AGAINST ORDER NO. 68/2010 tamrapal Pralhad Wase ..versus.. Sanjay Hardias Meshram and others =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-== Shri P..S.Wathore, Counsel for Appellant.. Miss. Udeshi, counsel for respondents 4m 6m 8, 9 . C ORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 2nd AUGUST, 2010. Heard. 2] Though several contentions are raised by learned counsel for the appellant, the fact remains, there are two sale deeds, genuineness of which is yet to be tested. Construction activities are going on. It is alleged, in between passing of the order and preferring of appeal, forcible possession was taken from the plaintiff. 3] The fact remains, as on today, at this stage, in absence of respondents except respondents 4, 6 ,8 & 9, blanket injunction need not be entertained. 2 4] However, respondents shall not create third party rights or get the property encumbered by any mode of conveyance till the next date. 5] Application allowed, as above. S.O. 17th August, 2010. Hamdast permitted. (K.U.Chandiwal) JUDGE. Rvjalit