IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.19066 of 2007 Date of Decision: October 27, 2009 Gurpreet Kaur .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Ranjodh Singh Sidhu, Advocate, for Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent No.1. None for respondent Nos.2 to 5. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing selection of respondent Nos.2 to 5 for the post of Physical Training Instructor (PTI-Female Backward Class). Learned counsel for the respondent- State contends that the facts need not be gone into in detail in so much as the entire process CWP No.19066 of 2007 [2] has been re-initiated. The petitioner has been asked to appear before the Selection Committee on 19.10.2009. Claim of the petitioner would be considered afresh. If the petitioner comes in merit, appropriate orders favouring the petitioner would be passed. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent-State, the petition is disposed of. (AJAI LAMBA) October 27, 2009 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?