IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16015 of 2008 SHYAMANAND PRASAD son of late Bangali Lal, resident of Ward No.4, Supaul, P.S.-Supaul, Dist.-Supaul. ……… ……Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR …… …..Opp.Party. ----------- 2. 25.6.2010. No one appears for the petitioner. Sole petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this court under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of the order which was passed long back on 9.5.2006 by Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saharsa, in Complaint Case No.855C of 2005. By the said order the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offences under sections 323, 406, 420, 465, 120B and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. I have perused the materials available on the record as well as the impugned order. It appears from the record that after filing of the complaint petition, the complainant was examined on solemn affirmation and in support of the complaint petition three witnesses were examined and the learned Magistrate, after being satisfied that prima facie case is made out, has passed the order of cognizance on 9.5.2006. I do not find any defect in the impugned order. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)