1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Thirteenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13575 of 2011 BASKARAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEELAVALAVOO POLICE STATION, MELUR, MADURAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.143/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.MP. AMALAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDI, Addl.Public Prosecutor( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police, for offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 324, 307 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.143 of 2011, the petitioner has come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, in a Tata Sumo car, some unidentified persons came and attacked the de-facto complainant with aruval resulting in injuries. The injured has been discharged from the hospital. Later on, investigation has come to light that one of the assailants is from the village of the de-facto complainant. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the name of the petitioner does not find place in the first information report. Had it been true, if the petitioner is one of the assailants certainly, his name would have been in the first information report. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor is not in a position to explain as to why the name of the petitioner is not mentioned in the first information report and the first information report states that some unidentified persons came and attacked the de-facto complainant. Thus, involvement of the petitioner is not clearly established at this stage. Having regard to the above, prima facie, I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a case for grant https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 of anticipatory bail. Therefore, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but with conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 13/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MELUR. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KEELAVALAVOO POLICE STATION, MELUR,MADURAI DISTRICT. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/S. S.MP. AMALAN Advocate SR.No.35630 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13575 of 2011 Date :13/10/2011 PA/18.10.2011/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/