IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8289 of 2009 Between: Diwakar Singh, S/o. jagdish Singh, R/o. 1-48-8/A, Mohan Nagar, Kothapet, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Divisional Engineer, A.P., Transco., Uppal Circle, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Assistant Divisional Engineer, A.P. Transco.,Uppal Circle, Ranga Reddy District. 3 Sri Gorige Bikshpathi, S/o. Bakkaiah, R/o. 2-7-4/A, Behind Uppal Masjid, Uppal, Hyderabad - 500 039 .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.TULASI REDDY Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2:MR.O.MANOHAR REDDY(SC FOR APTRANSCO) Counsel for Respondent No.3:MR. B.VIJAYSEN REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction more of particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.1 and 2 herein in shifting the existing High Tension Electrical Line from the land of the Respondents No.3 in Sy.Nos.8 and 9 of Peerzadiguda Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District adjoining to and across part of the land of the petitioner in Sy.No.219/a and 220/A of Uppal Bhagar Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction.” At the hearing, Sri V.Tulasi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to disposal of main petition as withdrawn, interim order, dated 22.04.2009 is vacated and WPMP.No.10838 of 2009 is dismissed. WVMP.No.1902 of 2009 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 10th JULY, 2009. kvni