IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 32 OF 2006 DAMACIANO RODRIGUES, VASCO DA GAMA,GOA. ... Appellant Versus MR. MOHAN SATU NAIK AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. R. G. Ramani, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. N. N. Sardessai, Advocate for the respondent No. 1 Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. Date:- 8th February, 2008 P.C. When the matter came up for hearing, the Advocates for the parties stated that there is an amicable settlement arrived at between the parties, which is as under : (a) The respondent No.1 would pay a sum of Rs.35,000/- to the appellant on 12th February, 2008. (b) The balance amount of Rs.1,00,000/- would be paid in 4 equal installments of Rs.25,000/- (c) The first installment would be paid on or before 12th March, 2008, the second installment on or before 12th April, 2008, the third installment on or before 12th May, 2008 and the fourth and final installment on or before 12th June, 2008. The said amounts shall be deposited in this Court on or before the due date, and the appellant shall be at liberty to withdraw the same. 2. The appellant agrees to the said proposal made on behalf of the respondent and thereupon craves leave to withdraw the appeal, subject to right to revive the appeal in case of failure on the part of the respondent No.1 to pay the said amount as agreed upon. 3. The appellant and the respondent No.1 present in the Court confirms the said statement. I accept the said statement made on behalf of the parties who are present in the Court. 4. The appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to revive the appeal in case of failure on the part of the respondent No.1 to pay the said amount as agreed upon. Order accordingly. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. ssm.