IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16606 of 2009 SRI JAGARNATH SINGH …PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. ASHISH ANAND @ CHHOTU …OPPOSITE PARTIES For the petitioner :Mr. Sandeep Kumar For the State :Mr. R.B.Roy ‘Raman’ ----------- 02. 27.01.2011 Heard both sides. Petitioner is the informant being he father of the victim girl. He is aggrieved by order dated 30.03.2009, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Patna in A.B.P.No.1990/2009, whereby on a consideration of materials available on record including the stand taken by the victim girl, O.P.No.2 has been granted anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while seeking bail, o.p.no.2 had made wrong statements about his age. He refers to different annexures in order to support the aforesaid contention. It is submitted that furnishing got up documents relating to his age, the order of bail was obtained. On a perusal of the order impugned, this Court finds that the learned Sessions Judge has assigned adequate reasons for grant of bail, particularly keeping in view the stand of the victim girl. In my view, no case for cancellation of bail is made out. The application is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )