IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 10.08.2010 COCP No.856 of 2010 Anant Ram ...Petitioner Versus B.K.Sharma and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. H.S.Dhandi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate, for the respondents. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Mr. Chatrath, learned counsel for the respondents states that the pensionary benefits for the period claimed in the writ petition i.e. from 1973 to 1999 have been granted to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that though such benefits have been paid, but the petitioner has not been granted benefit of ad hoc service in calculating pension and that he has not been paid any interest on account of delayed payment of pensionary benefits. In the writ petition, the petitioner has claimed interest on the retrial benefits, but there is no direction in the order passed by this Court granting interest on the payment of the retrial benefits. In view of the said fact, I do not find that the order passed by this Court has not been complied with. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to seek his remedy either for pension for ad hoc period or for interest in accordance with law in appropriate proceedings. Consequently, the present contempt petition is disposed of. Rule discharged. 10.08.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE