IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 345 of 2002 Between: M/s. Sri Chakra Cements Limited, Rep. by its Manager, Secretarian, 6-3-668/10/66, Durganagar colony, Punjagutta, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.P. TRANSCO., Rep. by its Managing Director, Vidyut Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. 2 Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Red Hills, Hyderaabad. 3 The Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, (A.P.TRANSCO), 4/7,Brodipet, Guntur. 4 The Divisional Engineer, Operation Circle, (A.P.TRANSCO), Macherla, Guntur District. 5 The Assistant Divisional Electrical Engineer, Operation Circle, (A.P.TRANSCO), Guntur. 6 The Financial Adviser & Chief Controller of Accounts, A.P.Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, Tirupathi. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order of orders or direction declaring as illegal, the demand for Rs. 63,02,900/- towards additional consumption deposit made through their letter No. SE/O/HT/ACD dated 20.7.2001 issued by the 3rd respondent, The Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, Guntur, Guntur District and the subsequent letter of the Controller of Accounts, A.P.S.P.D.C.L, Tirupathi (reppondent no.6) bearing Lr.No MD/FA & CCA/SAO (R & E)/HT/D.No. 630/01, dt.20-12-2001 consequently direct the respondents, the 3rd respondent in particular to make the review as contemplated under condition 28.2 keeping in view of the consumption of the petitioner company from TRANSCO from billing month of April, 2001 and further direct to refund the amount payable to the petitioner company after such review. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms.S.VANI Counsel for the Respondents: Mr.O.MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that subject-matter in this Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J 10th March, 2008 Tsy