IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39602 of 2009 1. SHOBHI MISTRI S/O SUBEDAR MISTRI, R/O VILL-BHADASI, P.S + DISTT- ARWAL Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Section 419, 420 of the Penal Code with regard to disbursement of Samajik Suraksha Pension is that disbursement was made as per the list prepared earlier in 1986-87. The impugned order reflects that after the petitioner joined he made payments to about 3-4 persons in pursuance of the aforesaid list, who had already expired. The defence that the petitioner acted bonafide in furtherance of the earlier list of the year 1986-87 is a matter to be appropriately considered in a regular bail without being prejudiced by the present order. The application is rejected. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)