cp16.11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.16 OF 2011 Sayyad Sajid Hussaini s/o Sayyad Sajjad Hussaini Chisti Jagirdar .. PETITIONER VERSUS S.N.M. Qureshi .. RESPONDENT Mr. S.S. Kazi, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Y.B. Pathan, advocate for the respondent. ===== CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 20 th APRIL, 2011. PER COURT : 1 Petitioner is alleging non-observance of the order passed by this court in Civil Application no. 8830/2010 in Writ Petition no. 2105/2009. Directions are issued in pursuance of the statement made by respondent no. 2 i.e. the District Wakf Officer that he would handover possession of the land with proportionate share of the petitioner within a period of one month. 2 An affidavit in reply has been presented on behalf of one Syed Naseruddin s/o Mohiuddin Quadri who is serving as Additional Collector and cp16.11 2 was the Chief Executive Officer at the relevant time, who made statement before the court. In the affidavit in reply presented by the contemnor, it is stated that the directions issued by this court have been complied with and the possession of the land to the extent of proportionate share of the petitioner has been handed over to him. Copies of the panchanama as well as possession receipt are annexed to the affidavit in reply. 3 Considering the contentions raised in the affidavit in reply as well as on consideration of the documents annexed to the affidavit, I am convinced that the undertaking given to this court has been observed by the contemnor. Considering this aspect of the matter, instant contempt petition need not be entertained and the same stands dismissed. 4 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE dyb