1 WP.738-2011 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 738 OF 2011 Ms. Krhshna Satish Singh ...Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents. ----- Ms. Krishna Satish Singh, Petitioner present in person. Mr. D.P. Adsule, APP for the State. ---- CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D. SALVI, JJ. JUNE 30, 2011. P.C.: 1 Heard Mrs. Krishna Singh, petitioner party in person, who is present in the court. Mr. Adsule, the learned APP appears for the State of Maharashtra. 2. In Criminal Writ Petition No.3358 of 2010, the statement of the learned APP,based on the instructions, was recorded that the investigation was in progress and it would be completed within a month. Hence, this court had directed that the Petition to be listed on 8.6.2011 for submission of the report by the learned APP. 2 WP.738-2011 3. However, on 8.6.2011 and on subsequent two dates, no report was submitted. Even today when the Criminal Writ Petition No.3358 of 2010 was called out for hearing, the learned APP expressed his helplessness as the concerned Police Officer was not present before the court. He prayed for further time till Monday i.e. 4th July, 2011, for submission of the report. He also made a statement that the investigation is completed and the charge-sheet is likely to be filed soon. If that be so, the reliefs prayed for in this Petition, namely compensation for delay in investigation cannot be considered separately. However, issues raised in this Petition are also subject to the income in the L.P.A. filed by the Petitioner challenging the order passed by the Single Bench on 17.9.2010 in Writ Petition No.5323 of 2010. 4. In our view this Petition is premature and does not deserve any adjudication, at least, at this stage. 5. Hence, the Criminal Writ Petition No.738 of 2011 is rejected. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.) 3 WP.738-2011