REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 233 of 2011 in -1- CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 9079 OF 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION: August 19, 2011. Parties Name Paushtik Agro Food (I) Pvt. Ltd. ...PETITIONER VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasbir Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg PRESENT: Mr. Rupinder S. Khosla, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Advocate, for respondent No. 4 Jasbir Singh, J. (oral) Order. This application has been filed to review an order dated February 2, 2011, which reads thus: “At the time of arguments, counsel for respondent No. 4- HSIIDC states that during pendency of this writ petition, the petitioner has received the compensation for the land which is subject matter of dispute in this case. REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 233 of 2011 in -2- CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 9079 OF 2009 If that is so, we are of the opinion that in view of the ratio of the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in Jaswant Singh & Ors. vs. The State of Haryana & Ors. in CWP No. 19676 of 2005” decided on 23.07.2007 and also in Darshan Lal & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Ors. in CWP No. 7186 of 2010 decided on 13.10.2010, this writ petition is not maintainable. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. However, it is made clear that if information given by counsel for respondent No. 4 is found to be incorrect, the petitioner is at liberty to get this writ petition revived.” In this application, it is stated that the information given by the counsel for respondent No. 4 on February 2, 2011, was not correct. Taking note of the same, notice was issued. Shri Kamal Sehgal, Advocate, for respondent No. 4 very fairly states that the averment made by the applicant is correct. In view of above, we recall our order dated February 2, 2011 and restore the writ petition to its original number. Put up for hearing as per roster. ( Jasbir Singh ) Judge (Rakesh Kumar Garg) Judge August 19, 2011 DKC