/\ $-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3081t2010 GAURAV MlrrAL rhrouoh none ..... Petitioner Through none VCTSUS ..... Respondent . STATE & ORS Through Mr. Sunil Sharma, Addl. PP for the State lO Sl Suresh Kumar with the complainant. Mr S.K. Ambudar with Mr.Satish Dayanandan for Respondent No. 2 +=_ CORAM: JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA ORDER % 26.10.2010 l> None has appeared for the petitioner despite a pass-over. lt is stated by the counsel for respondent that no compromise has been entered into between the petitioner and the respondent. He states that the petitioner has placed on record of this Court fake documents. Additional Addl. PP for the State also states that lO had visited the complainant and it was informed to the lO that no compromise was arrived at and the documents produced by the petitioner are fake. The complainant is present. He also states the same thing. It seems to be the reason for non appearance of the petitioner. i'tF SHO, P.S. Barakhambha Road, New Delhi, is directed to register atFlR against t\b the petitioner in respect of filing of fake documents in this court and initiate action. Copy of documents filed in this petition be fonruarded to the SHO along with a copy of this order. II The petition is dismissed. I ks, SHIV NARA)|"Tff DHINGRA,J ocToBER 26,2010 acm Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified