IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH APRIL 2008 / 20TH CHAITHRA 1930 OP.No. 38833 of 2002(W) ----------------------- PETITIONERS: -------------------- 1) N.P. SANKARANKUTTY, PRESIDENT AKHILA KARALA VISWAKARMA MAHA SABHA, CHENGANNOOR P.O., RESIDING AT LEKSHMI SADANAM, PUDUPADI P.O., MOOVATTUPUZHA. (LATE). Addl. 2) V.K.SEKHAR, PRESIDENT, AKHILA KERALA VISWAKARMA MAHA SABHA VARKKUTHUSSERIL, KIDANGUR SOUTH P.O., KIDANGOORKARA. (Addl.2nd petitioner is impleaded as per order in IA.No.4628/2007 dated 4.7.2007) BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN(SR) SRI.S.SUJIN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHENGANNOOR. 2. P.R. DEVADAS, S/O. S. RAGHAVAN, KAUSALYA BHAVAN, AYATHIL, KOLLAM-17. BY ADV. SRI.E.R.VENKATESWARAN GOVT.PLEADER SMT.N.SUDHA DEVI. THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OP.No. 38833 of 2002(W) ORDER ON CMP.NO.65433/2002 IN OP.NO.38833/2002-W. DISMISSED. 9.4.2008. Sd/- T.R.Ramachandran Nair, Judge. Petitioners' Exhibits:- P1: Copy of the judgment dtd.8.4.2002 in OP.No.30506/2001. P2: Copy of the judgment dtd.19.3.2002 in OP.No.4335/02 on the file of this Hon'ble Court. P3: Copy of the judgment dtd.12.6.2002 in MC.No.1813/01/C on the file of the first respondent. P4: Copy of the order dtd.12.12.2002 in MC.No.1813/01/C on the file of the first respondent. Respondents' Exhibits:- Nil. ( true copy ) PA to Judge. kvs/- T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ========================= OP.No.38833 of 2002-W. ========================= Dated this the 9th day of April, 2008. J U D G M E N T Aggrieved by Ext.P4 order by which an interim order of stay was vacated by the first respondent, the petitioner has approached this Court. The issue relates to the dispute between the petitioner and the second respondent relating to the affairs of Akhila Kerala Viswakarma Maha Sabha. There have been several disputes between the parties. In between, the second respondent had moved the Sub Divisional Magistrate for getting an order regarding publication of Karmayugam monthly issue. Earlier the declaration for publication of the magazine submitted by the 2nd respondent was accepted which was subjected to a review petition by the petitioner before the statutory authorities. By Ext.P3 that was dismissed. The order of stay was also vacated and challenging the same this writ petition is filed. Obviously the petitioner wanted to OP.No.38833 of 2002-W. -: 2 :- challenge the basic order by filing an appeal before the appellate authority. Even though the writ petition was admitted there was no interim order in force during the pendency of this writ petition. It is also reported that a civil suit between the parties is also pending. 2) The petitioner will be free to pursue his statutory remedy of appeal. With liberty to do so, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. kvs/-