IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3907 of 2010 M/S PRAKASH TRADING & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 5.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Submission of learned counsel is that the notice issued to the petitioners for possession under section 13(4) of SARFAESI Act is in breach of the requirement of law under section 13(2) of the said Act. His contention is that his objection with the Bank in terms of annexure-1 has not been answered and the consequential action of taking over possession of the property has been taken. By no stretch of imagination annexure-1 can be said an objection filed on behalf of the petitioners under section 13(2) of the Act because annexure- 1 is only a prayer made to the Bank to allow the petitioner to deposit the loan amount in instalments and to provide opportunity to compromise it within a given time frame. It is no objection in the eye of law under section 13(2) of the Act and the Bank is not bound to respond to the same. The consequential action cannot be said to be an illegal action on their part. This writ application has no merit and it is dismissed as such. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)