$5 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHRI JAGDISH BHALLA, Ag. CJ WP. (C) No. 4051 of 20a? PETITEONERS 1. Yog Singh Thakur, 8/0, Shri Jahan Singh, aged about 30 years Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Mainpur Bloc}; Development Gariyabandh,’ District Raipur. 2‘ Piluram Yadav, S/o. Shri Toshuram Yadav, aged about 33 years, Secretary Gram Panchayat Mainpur, Block Deveiopment Gariyabandh, District Raipur, VERSUS RESPONDENT$ ‘r. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Ministry of Panchayat; D.K.Sr Bhawan, Raipur. 2. The Sub Divisionai Officer (Revenue) i Presiding Ob‘icer, Gariyabandn, Raipur‘ 3. The Gram Panchayat, Mainpur, Block Development Gariyabandh, District Raipur. Petition under Articie 226/22? of the Consrihrrinn nf india Present: Shri 8P. Sharma, counsel for the petitionere Shri U‘N‘S. Dee, Govt. Advocate for the State Shri Kunai Das, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Anoop Majumdar, counsei for the oaveatori ORAL ORDER (Passed on 27m September, 2067) Petitioners are EX—Sarparich and EX-Secretary respectively of Gram Panchayat, Mainpur —2r On the basis of certain complaint a preliminary enquiry was helo' wherein it was found that the petitioners are prima facie guilty of hnancial irregularities. Thereafter the petitioners were called upon to submit their reply so that the matter can be hnaily decided. Petitioners took time twice to file their reply but tailed to do sot Accordingly final order was passed and petitioners were held guilty and recovery of Rs,7:85,2QOI- to be //»7/" equally divided between them was ordered to be made Aggrieved by the §Q said order petitioners med an appeal before the Addit‘iona! CoHector who while entertaining the appeai has decline to pass an interim order on 20‘“ April, 2007‘ Aggrieved by the said order the petitioners med a revision before the Director, Panchayat Who too dismissed the said revision by order dated 29-05-200? Hence this petition. The matter is pending in the appeals it has been informed to this Court on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have tried to file their respective reply but the same was not taken on record, interest of justice would suffice if the petitioners<bring WQW 51V t eir reply before the Appellate Authority ‘who shall consider the same while deciding the appeal. With the observation made above, writ petition is disposed of. l l Sd/- l Acting Chief Justice kamJlL,