1^^ ....-••^®^-"""" ^;^y ^ c- S'\o<34( •tfiiS^t C KSi-i- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR w.p. NO . 1354 L2006 PETITIONER ^' Vs RESPONDENTS Baisakhu Ram, son of Shri Bodhan Lal , by caste- Scheduled Tribe, aged about 46 years, resident of fcl^S^^60 pan^wy-) ft.ci-l'f'"*- • y 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Ministry of Home, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. /2. The. Inspector General of Police, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Raipur. / WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. sn^c^i i<;-)i* sn^i S^HRt^I?^ ?»•.. Barve ^ [ p -•^a ^,.W^49C^)^D antn'^giigT^ftg 4ittiivRn 4W<"il" ^ fs^S ifs^K qr artitFT 3»I^f 26-4-20uS: - Shri Ajit Singh, counsel for th< Shri Ashutosh Kachchwahi respondents. Heard bcth the counsel. By the instant petition, the i propriety of ,the order dated 3' petitioner's sen/ices were termin; unauthorizsdly absent from the dut i.e.for-384days. From the record, it appears t! the snquiry a!so. This petition hs about 10 years, tterefore, on the maintainabte. Hence the pstition is petitioner. Govt. Advocate for the State/ letitioner ha?,.question6d tegality and t-8-96, Annexure-P/2, whereby Uie ited on ths ground that he *was with effect from 22-10-93 to 9-11-84 ist the petittoner didnot participste in been filed after the iapse of round jround of iatehes this petltion is not iismissed. : Sdl- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [Tt^^fw ir[U.iiKi\^n3iUE tK^-ltefe3-^'?.;"^-"'':;3^^='^'- •. ;: •. ^~'^-^^:'±''::^S^W'^e!SS^^a^svi,^^^^^^.^