* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 88/2010 UMESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in Person. versus KISHAN GANESH & ANR ....' Respondent Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv. with Respondent in person. COMM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL ORDER o/o 23.L1.20L0 RC.REV. 88/2010 & CM 20847/2010 & CM No.20465/201Q Petitioners who appears in person submits that he is not pressing the petition on merits and prays that he may be given time till 30.06.2011 to vacate the premises in question. The respondent is present in person. Under the instructions from the respondent, the counsel for the respondent states that the respondent has no objection in granting time to the petitioner up to 30.06.2011 and the respondent will not execute the eviction order till then. In view of above statement given by the petitioner and the respondent, the present petition and pending ap.plications stand disposed of as not pressed. The petitioner is granted time till 30.06.2011 to vacate the premises in question subject to filing of usual undertaking within two weeks with a copy to the respondent. Renotify on 2L.L2.2OLO. In the meanwhile, the respondent shall not execute the eviction order till the next date of hearing. The parties to appear in person on the next date. \ I I c<l ,l "rr-' ;t/ VEENA BIRBALJ NOVEMBER 23,ZOLO ssb -/",//,/.'"4V t** 6/*r' (wlEgixu I'thL6,+tc) LJ -)l- zole Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified