IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN TUESDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2009 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 14099 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MUHAMMED MUSTHAFA, S/O. MUHAMMED HAJI, CHEERANGAN HOUSE P.O THENNALA, TIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTNDENT OF POLICE, MALAPPURAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTTAKKAL, POST KOTTAKKAL, MALAPPURAM DIST. 3. KRISHNAKUMAR, S/O. M.D. NAIR, KAPRAT HOUSE, POST VENNIYUR, TIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DIST. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.A.SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & P.BHAVADASAN, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 14099 of 2009 ------------------------------- Dated this the 26th May, 2009 J U D G M E N T Raman, J. The allegation of the petitioner is that in a civil dispute pending between him and the third respondent, police is interfering and asking the petitioner to come to the police station. The allegation that he is asked to come to the police station is not supported by any material produced. However, the fact remains that no complaint as such is received by the police from any quarter against the petitioner, and as such, the presence of the petitioner is not required at present. Needless to say that if, towards an enquiry or investigation, the presence of a party is required, the police will have to refer to the provisions contained in Section 160 of Code of Criminal Procedure and issue notice W.P.(C) No.14099 of 2009 2 asking for such appearance. With the above observation, the writ petition is closed. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE P.BHAVADASAN , JUDGE. nj.