IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1744 of 2007 DEEPAK KUMAR CHOUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Purshottam Kumar Jha For the respondent nos.1 to 6 : Mr. V.M.K.Sinha, S.C - III --- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice And Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chandramauli Kr. Prasad --- Dated, the 29th August, 2008 We heard the counsel for the petitioner. 2. On 16th January, 2006, while disposing of the writ petition filed by the petitioner, a Division Bench of this court passed the following order: “Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that he will make again a fresh representation within two weeks to the District Magistrate (respondent no.2). Upon such a representation being made, obviously, the District Magistrate (respondent no.2) will look into it and will take appropriate action as he may deem fit and proper. It is further clarified that we are not expressing any opinion about the issues raised including the right to advance the grievance voiced in this petition under the banner of the Public Interest Litigation. With this observation, the petition shall stand disposed of at the admission stage, as having been withdrawn.” 3. A fresh representation in terms of liberty granted by the order dated 16th January, 2006, was made by the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that no proper steps in response to 2 the petitioner’s representation dated 25th November, 2005 have been taken. 4. The respondent no.2 has shown cause. It is stated therein that upon receipt of the representation from the petitioner, respondent no.4 has been directed to lodge a First Information Report against alleged illegally appointed Head Clerk, namely, Jeevan Ratan Kushwaha. 5. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the action taken by the respondent no.2 is only an eyewash and the person who has been instrumental in the wrongful act has escaped action. 6. We are afraid, the contention is wholly misconceived. This court did not direct any particular action. We are, thus, satisfied that no further action needs to be taken by us in the matter. 7. MJC stands disposed of accordingly. R. M. Lodha, CJ. Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, J. Neyaz/-