IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH AUGUST 2009 / 4TH BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 24532 of 2009(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- M/S.ROPOS PLYWOOD, M.C.ROAD, PULLUVAZHI, PERUMBAVOOR, REP. BY THE PARTNER POLY THOMAS. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.THANU PILLAI SRI.K.P.JOY RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, SPECIAL CIRCLE, PERUMBAVOOR. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER(APPEAL), COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE INSPECTING ASST. COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, MUVATTUPUZHA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. MR. C.K. GOVINDAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ........................................................................ W.P.(C) No. 24532 OF 2009 ......................................................................... Dated this the 26 th August, 2009 J U D G M E N T Challenging Ext. P1 order passed by the first respondent, the petitioner has already preferred Ext.P2 statutory appeal along with Ext. P3 petition for stay before the second respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that, it is without any regard to the pendency of the said proceedings that the third respondent is proceeding with coercive steps as borne by Ext.P4 demand notice, which hence is sought to be intercepted by filing the present Writ Petition. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on the appeal as well as the petition for stay. It is further made clear that till such appropriate orders are passed on Ext.P3 petition for stay, all further proceedings pursuant to Ext. P4 shall W.P.(C) No. 24532 OF 2009 2 be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed of . P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk