1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1171 OF 2010 Hanuman Sukhdeo Chauhan Petitioner versus Sitaram Dashrath Chauhan and others Respondents Ms.Snehal Ratnakar i/by A.S.Patil for petitioner. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 26th February 2010 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is the original plaintiff. An application was made by the petitioner under Rule 1 of Order XXXIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The said application was rejected by the Trial Court and directed the petitioner to pay the court fees by 11th March 2002. Being aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner purported to file a revision application. As there was delay in filing the revision application, an application for condonation of delay was taken out which was rejected by the impugned order. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions states that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the court fees payable on the suit. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the court fees will be 2 paid within a period of six weeks from today. The statement is accepted. 3. In view of this statement, the petition is disposed of by passing following order :- A) If the petitioner pays the court fees payable on the suit within a period of six weeks from today, the Trial Court will extend the time for payment of court fees. If amount of court fees is not paid within six weeks, the order dated 12th February 2002 passed by the Trial Court will stand; B) The writ petition is disposed of in above terms. (A.S.OKA, J.)