IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2609 of 2010 AMRENDRA KUMAR YADAV S/O SRI YASHODHAR PRASAD YADAV, R/OVILLAGE-PHULPRAS, P.S. PHULPRAS, DISTRICT- MADHUBANI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES AND FAMILY PLANNING, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR-IN-CHIEF, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES AND FAMILY PLANNING, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE CIVIL SURGEON-CUM-CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, MADHUBANI. 4. THE IN-CHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, GHOGHARDIHA, MADHUBANI………RESPONDENTS ………………….. 02 07.12.2010 Annexure-4, on the face of it, does not carry any date as to when the petitioner approached the Director Health Services. Obviously, the corresponding statement made in the writ application is only to justify filing of the writ application at this belated stage. Court is not impressed by the authenticity of Annexure-2. Therefore, no interference is required with the decision as such which was passed a decade years ago against many similarly situated persons including the petitioner. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the writ application to pursue any other remedy which may be available. This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the above liberty. Shahzad ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)