IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5740 of 2011 BIRENDRA MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in this anticipatory bail application during the course of the day. Petitioner is one of the named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant carries general allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. and having second wife without any specific details. Such allegations have been denied. Petitioner intends to continue marital life with the complainant who is his only wife who as appears from the order of the court below in spite of taking steps do not turned up for negotiations at any point of time. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation, in the event the petitioner filing an application before the competent court under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act and submitting proof of such filing and in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks, let petitioner, namely, 2 Birendra Mahto, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M. Vaishali, Hajipur, in connection with Complaint Case No. 92/2008. Subject to condition under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, and in the event of failure on three consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)