IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.} W.P. S No. ' ‘ 2011 Ram Prasaei Marya s/o Shn' Shobha Ram Morya aged about 32 years R/o. R.N.T. Hospital Kondagon Distt. Bastar (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS (1) State of €hhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Heaith and famiiy Welfare ‘ Department, D.K.S_ Bhawan, W X Raipur, (C.G.) fr?“&\\ (2) /Chief Medical And Helth officer office of Chief Medical and Health officer Bastar, Jagtlalpur {C.G.} (3) /Block Medicai and Health offmer, Community Health Centre Pharasgon,Bastar (CV G.) 7 /A (4) Shri Anand Kumar Swi S/o Shri Gopal Singh Aged about 3S years, R/ o Shiv Mandir Ward, Jagdalpur, Distt. Jagdalpur (CG) WE? ?E’i‘§?§§§ §E§E§ $RE§€LE 22d THE CONSTITUTION OF EEQEEé‘; /’ WW,W,W mmwm/W 7fjgaggéi, mm (Wu) aMwfai'eH ammm’m WWW WW Wm §E3Wawé¥t $3 : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrkrastava, J. 12.12.201 1 Shri RS. Koshy, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Y.S’ Thakur, D: V.‘ Advocate General for the State/ respondents 1 to 3 on advance copy. )roached this Court aggrieved by the pointment. At the outset, learn d counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that earlier, wri petition was filed before the Court challenging process of appo tment through which the petitioners were selected and appoint d and that writ petition was allowed and writ appeal was also d smissed. He however submits that in those matters, the petition rs were not impleaded as party and they had no notice and‘kno ledge. Therefore, the petitioners have now approached this Cou by filing this petition Challenging the order of cancellation of a pointment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that du ‘ng the pendency of the writ petition, , orders of appointment we e issued on 16/11/20 10, which fact Was not brought to the noti e of the concerned Court by any of the parties. He further submi knowledge of the appellate ourt also. The petitioner has] apj order of cancellation ofhis that'this fact was not brought to the XIvHC—78 Wm m 20° mm (Wm mmm ammm mmm ~g_ mgggfgm ~ . I am afraid, this Codrt cannot come to any aid of the petitioner; The gaunds which have been raised by the petitioner ‘Cannot be allowed to be raised in a separate petition. Upon being inquired, it is informed that me petitioner has not tiled any review petition before the Writ Couri or even in the writ appellate Court. Leaving the petitioner to avail such remedy as may be available under the law, this petition is disposed of. i/w; Sd/— . Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Praveen