IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49835 of 2007 PAPPU RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANOTHER. ----------- 3. 07.5.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the informant. Admittedly petitioner and his relations have filed cases under Section 48(E) of the B.T.Act prior to 31st March, 2007 seeking conversion of their right as under raiyat of the informant into right of raiyat under the State. These applications were filed soon after the informant purchased the land in respect whereof the petitioner and his relations are claiming right of under raiyat. The first information report has been lodged after those cases were filed under Section 48(E) of the B.T.Act. The alleged incident of looting, as depicted in the first information report, has not been witnessed by anyone else although, according to the information, the action complained of is a wild action. In the circumstances I think petitioner has been able to make out a good case for grant of anticipatory bail. The application is allowed. - 2 - In the event of arrest or surrender of the petitioner within six weeks from today, let the petitioner, namely, Pappu Ram be released on bail on his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case no. 46/2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. dk ( Barin Ghosh, J )