•-/' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Wnt Pet1t1on No 37-/^1 / 2004 Petitioner Uined Ram Sahu S/o Late Sube Rani Sahu Aged About 28 Years R/o Vm. Chedia, Post Taarri, Teh. Gurur, Distt. Durg Chhattisgarh VERSUS 1 sufvtlWW u ' ' '- AlfyB >C 6.1 iNOU Respondents 1. State of Chhatdsgarh, Through: Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Divisional Forest Ofiicer, Forest Division, Durg, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE GOfrlSTITlJ^-iON OF INDIA > XI-HC-22 -ysi ^rrpTRTI(, ydl-y'itf, 'iNwHy w^ TR%-^( ^ / 3,1 •qriTFTT^TOra"""""""""""""""""""ff:r 200 fq^s' 3iri?i^! -re^Ri'ZT|^?I 'iKHWBftt' Sl-12-2005 ail^i ^rmw 'ui?" ^irafeFfrT tIPRtr" fezt'riWZR •?; a'Rn.ai^l Petitioner by Shri Shri Sandeep Dubey~Govt. Advoca| CT.^^Tv^vy^a Advocate. he employee has occurred on or after 1 -1 ;e. for the State. l-1eard. This case relates to compassionat^ appointment consequent upon the death of an ^mployee serving in the State. Learned cpunsel for the petitioner cjategorically stated that in this case, the death of -1997 and not earlier. It is further submitted that |n bateh of cases bearing W. P. No. 1322/20p2 involving the same question orders have been jsassed by this Court on 20/12/2005. He prays that similar oKlere may be passed in this case ! biso. I Learned counsel for the State does i^ot dispute the above fact a'nd state that the State bf Chhattisgarh has taken a decision t^ consider the cases of dependants of those pmployees who died on or after 1/11/1997 |strictly in accordance with the policy prevalent at that time. In view of the submissions made |vithout expressing any opinion on the merit^ of the case, in the opinion ofthis Court, ends of |ustice will be sen/ed if a direction is giveri ;oncerned to consider and decide the cas |to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities ^ of the petitioner in accordance with the policy. (>revalent at the time of death of the empl^yee concerned. If the petitioner found eligible, ^ppointment orders will be issued as earlyjas possible on or before 30 Aprit, 2006. The lt)etitioner 13 also directed to render due co-dperation to the authorities. It is made clear that if ^ny grievance still remains, the petitioner 1 ' ipcluding fiting ofthe petition before this Coi With the aforesaid obsen/ations. this Certified copy as per rules. Copy to the State counsel, who wi ijespondents for compliance. by learned counsel appearing for the parties, may avail the remedy available under the law trt. petition stands disposed of. |1 be obliged to communicate the order to the » .0 ^/^ • i:SS».i--^..;'.';^•,:: '^ Ms'E^ff'SSMSi.SiS';:'/, :\'':^^^s^ sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^ ES tMss B 1 88 >