IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 30552 of 2011(T) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. JAVID.P, S/O.KUNHIMOHAMMED PULIKUTH, PEERAKUZHIYIL HOUSE, VEEMBOOR, MARIYAD P.O, MANJERI VIA,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. ARUN BHASKAR, APARNA NIVAS, KARIMBAYIL THAZHAM, CHEVAYOOR P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. ASWIN M.C., PANAGATT HOUSE, NEAR CHETHANA PHARMACEUTICALS, PERINTHALMANNA P.O., MALAPPURAM DSITRICT. BY ADV. SMT.MEDONA LOPEZ RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENJIPPALAM, KOZHIKODU-673 636. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENJIPPALAM, KOZHIKODU-673 636. BY ADV.SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AV WPC.NO.30552/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS : EXHIBIT.P1 : COPY OF THE MARK LIST SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXHIBIT.P2 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXHIBIT.P3 : COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF RS.390/- REMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXHIBIT.P4 : COPY OF THE MARK LIST SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXHIBIT.P5 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXHIBIT.P6 : COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF RS.390/- REMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXHIBIT.P7 : COPY OF THE MARK LIST SUBMITTED BY 3RD PETITIONER. EXHIBIT.P8 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY 3RD PETITIONER. EXHIBIT.P9 : COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF RS.390/- REMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NL /TRUE COPY/ P.A TO JUDGE AV ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 30552 of 2011 T ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 16th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petitioners submit that they appeared for B.Tech examination and failed in some papers. They submitted applications for revaluation and filed this writ petition seeking an order for expeditious revaluation and declaration of their results. 2. I heard standing counsel appearing for the University also. 3. Having regard to the facts pointed out, it is directed that the University shall complete the revaluation sought for and declare the result of the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, provided the applications have been received and are otherwise in order. W.P.(C) No.30552/2011 : 2 : 4. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the University for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/16/11 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge