1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2690 OF 2009 Mohamed Hussain Haji Abdulla .. Petitioner Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2691 OF 2009 Sarvar Ali Sayyed Ali .. Petitioner Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai .. Respondents Mr.V.R.Tripathi for the petitioners Ms.V.S.Gharpure for respondent / B.M.C. Mr.A.H.Khatri i/b Mr.G.K.Wadhawa for the intervenor CORAM : J. N. Patel, Acting C.J., B.R.Gavai, J. DATE : February 2, 2010 P.C. : 1. The petitioners have approached this court seeking writ, orders or directions to respondent Corporation that they should hear the petitioners and then 2 proceed to pass the order as the order impugned in the petition came to be passed by the respondent Corporation without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and on the terms that the petitioners have failed to place on record documents in support of their claim. 2. In the course of hearing it was pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have placed on record documents in support of their case which was duly received by the office of the respondent Corporation. On this fact being brought on record, the respondent Corporation have now submitted that they will give a fresh hearing to the petitioners and appropriate orders will be passed in the matter thereby the order impugned does not survive and therefore, the same is quashed and set aside. 3. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) (B.R.GAVAI, J)