IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17637 of 2008 BHOTU DOM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 6.5.2008 This is an application for grant of regular bail in a case of dacoity under sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the Explosive Substance Act against eight unknown miscreants Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant Ajay Kumar Jha has not named the petitioner in the first information report but he has named the petitioner in his further statement. He submits that the informant and the nephew, Amritesh Kumar Jha, of the informant have also named the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner was put on T.I.P. in which the informant and his nephew Amritesh Kumar Jha and the Driver Bachchu Singh did not identify the petitioner. He further submits that no stolen article was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He, therefore, submits that the petitioner, who is in custody from the month of December, 2007, be released on bail. Considering the submissions made, the petitioner, Bhotu Dom, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in connection with Kajraili P.S.Case No.43 of 2007, G.R. No.3118 of 2007. Md.S. (Anwar Ahmad)