1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2832 OF 2010 Vijay S/o Govind Sapkale ..PETITIONER -VERSUS- The Chief Officer ..RESPONDENT ......... Mr.P.R. Katneshwarkar, advocate for petitioner. Mr.G.V. Wani, advocate for respondent. ........ (CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) DATE : 4 th August, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard counsel. 2. The Petition arises out of the orders rendered by Labour Court and Industrial Court, whereby the interim relief has been refused to the petitioner. The petitioner was appointed in Fire Brigade Department of Municipal Council. Subsequently, he has been removed on the ground that he was not eligible to get appointment on the post. The main dispute is pending before the Labour Court. It prima facie appears that the interim relief has been refused by the Labour Court as well as Revisional Court for the reason that the petitioner did not possess the heavy duty driving licence as on the date of application. At the present stage, no 2 opinion is required to be expressed on merits. However, prima facie, it does appear that the requirement may not have been complied with and as such, the interim orders of the Courts below require no inference for want of perversity. The Petition is disposed of accordingly. The main complaint application be expedited for final hearing and shall be decided within a period of eight months as far as possible, on merits thereof. (V.R.KINGAONKAR) JUDGE gas/wp2832.10