COURT OF CHHAniSGARH AT BILASPUI 3!T PETITION (S) No,13i9 of 2007 ;ur. years, s/o Ra| Suyog Parisar, extensi Nagar, Ratlam, Dist( Satli ;ar Mukherj' n,(M.P.) 1CMTS ^h* Thia ni ^p f^, \ ^.U.J 2. The Coiiector, District Mai untant Geni ?Uiii »<>tisy\ PETiTION U! l,nai' ARTICLE 226 OF THE COi lasamund, (C.<3.) e of Chhattisgarh, mTUTSON OF ra ^.^- itlUBt, i&y 4f^»frS^A iiii,. oiiilia uuai, ra'isi Lawysi lur llicstatts/l t? tate/'respondent No. 1 shri A.K.Barik, Advocate appearing on behalf o1 Advocate for the respondent No. 3 wiai (Passed on 28th day of February, 20Q< .1] 1118 U( .1-. !1 USI ^- IS v t, in the matter of 'A'.P. NQ. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Vs. The State of Chhattlsgarh & Others) and other connected 'r of j a-i i ii; duss as ths disputed questlon of facts wsre invoived. The Committee constltuted by the Qovernment, pureuant to the order 19.06.2006 in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Kela Bai Chandrakar Vs. Government and others) and order 13.03.2008 'sn M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Ghhattisgarh & Others Vs. Baiinath IVanda! and another). Thus, this petitlon Is squareiy covered &y thejudgment and order dated 31st of Januan/, 2008 in ¥»'.°.No. 4642/2004 Baiinath (supra) as submitted by •al Wlth the consent of the D£ of In the i.e dlrected to send ths from ths Eion !< the office ol the to the Committee, e af rsceipt of a copy of the petitlon from thi •s nn soUce to ths petitloner period of 15 days. The '4 tft*i^*l a. within a turth o ths pstitloner. The petiti iddltiona! documerts, if wment of retirai dues, tfithin a of four months from the of recelpt of a copy of -sis order v' sxtra c< !UUUI The petltioner shs Panei Lawyer for t'ns SSate/respondents 1 and 2 and Shri Bari'K Advocate Tor the respontient No. 3, for forwarding the same to thi r^i ol grievs :^ai 'u ies, "rt is not necessary to fiie a writ petition befors t'nis Court Ths an be moved before ise to s! stated above. The Psnsion Coi Eain the representatlon/applicatK itts 'ctiv iV. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge A-nut