FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION C.A.NO.3088 OF 2006 IN F.A.ST. NO.13073 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms.Deepa Chavan i/by M/s. Little & Co. for the Applicant. Mr. S.N.Gawade, AGP. for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : September 12, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant and the learned A.G.P. for the State Government. Office Noting shows that the contesting respondents have been duly served. There is no reply filed to the application. Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (A.S. OKA, J.) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION C.A.NO.3089 OF 2006 IN F.A.ST. NO.13073 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms.Deepa Chavan i/by M/s. Little & Co. for the Applicant. Mr. S.N.Gawade, AGP. for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : September 12, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.P. appearing for the State. The contesting respondents have been duly served. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant, on instructions, states that the compliance has been made with ad-interim order dated 23rd February, 2007 by depositing the requisite amount. In view of this statement, ad-interim relief granted earlier deserves to be continued as an interim relief. 2. Hence, application is disposed of by directing that ad interim relief granted on 23rd February, 2007 will continue to operate as the interim relief. 3. This order will not preclude the original claimants from making an application for withdrawal of the amount. If such application is made it will be considered on its own merits after hearing the applicant. 4. If such application for withdrawal of the amount is not made by the original claimants within a period of three months from today, the amount deposited by the applicant shall be invested by the Trial Court in fixed deposit in any Nationalised bank and the fixed deposit shall be renewed from time to time till the disposal of the appeal. (A.S. OKA, J.) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION F.A.ST. NO.13073 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAL, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms.Deepa Chavan i/by M/s. Little & Co. for the Appellant. Mr. S.N.Gawade, AGP. for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : September 12, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Admit. Printing is dispensed with. 2. Time of eight weeks is granted to remove all office objections. If all the office objections are not removed within the stipulated time, the Appeal will stand dismissed for want of prosecution without further reference to the Court. 3. Private paperbook along with Decree Form shall be filed by the Appellant within a period of one year from today. If compliance is not made within stipulated time, the Appeal shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution without further reference to the Court. (A.S. OKA, J.)