1 mp t IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1995 of 2008 Noor Mohd.Jamman Shaikh .. Applicant versus N.C.B & State of Maharashtra .. Respondents ... Mr.Atul Sarpande for the applicant. Ms.Revati Dhere with Rutuja Ambekar for respondent. Mr.Rajesh More APP for the State. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 19th November 2008 P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. This is a second bail application at the instance of the applicant accused. By an order dated 20th November 2007, the previous bail application has been rejected for reasons recorded therein. In my view, there is no change of circumstances entitling 2 the applicant to a bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that there is a change of circumstance in as much as hearing of the trial has commenced and eight witnesses have been examined and the evidence of such eight witnesses does not disclose complicity of the applicant of the crime. Firstly, it may stated that copies of the deposition of the eight witnesses are not annexed to the application and it is not possible to rely upon the ipse dixit of the applicant that the eight witnesses do not disclose complicity of the accused. Secondly, if eight witnesses have been examined the trial must be nearing its conclusion. At the midst of the trial, it would not be appropriate to grant a bail. 4. In the circumstances, application is rejected. (D.G. KARNIK, J)