1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7931/2008. Badam Bai. VS Civil Judge (J.D.), Bundi and Others. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7931/2008. Badam Bai. VERSUS Civil Judge (J.D.), Bundi and Others. 06.07.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Ravi Chirania, for the petitioner. Mr.Deepak Pareek, for the respondents. ***** Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition has been filed by the plaintiff- petitioner challenging the impugned order dated 29.05.2008 by which the application submitted by the plaintiff for placing on record the certified copy of the mortgage-deed, which is said to be in respect of the property in dispute and which has a bearing so far as the title of the plaintiff is concerned, as claimed by the petitioner No doubt these facts are contested by the defendant-respondents and the submission of the learned counsel for the respondents is that the document in question though is the certified copy obtained from the registration department and the archiver department at Ajmer, however, the said document has no relevancy so far as the property in question is concerned and, therefore, the plaintiff is only trying to misguide the court by adducing the said document in evidence. 2 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7931/2008. Badam Bai. VS Civil Judge (J.D.), Bundi and Others. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order. The learned court below has rejected the application on the ground that the plaintiff is only trying to delay the proceedings. Having considered the submissions and having perused the impugned order, I am of the view that it is not in dispute that so far as the document in question is concerned, the certified copy of the same has been obtained from the concerned departments at Ajmer, the genuiness of the same cannot prima facie be doubted. So far as the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent that the same does not pertains to the property in dispute is concerned, that is a subject matter of investigation which can be proved by both the parties by leading evidence for and against the same. In the facts and circumstances, I am inclined to set aside the impugned order and allow the writ petition and direct the learned trial court to take the aforesaid document on record and permit the parties to lead evidence in support and against the same. Subject to the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.