IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.706 of 2009 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AVIATION, A-WING, JANPATH BHAWAN, JANPATH, NEW DELHI, 2. BUREAU OF CIVIL AVIATION, SECURITY, MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIATION, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, A-WING, JANPATH BHAWAN, JANPATH, NEW DELHI. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITY (CIVIL AVIATION) BUREAU OF CIVIL AVIATION, SECURITY, MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIATION, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, A-WING, JANPATH BHAWAN, JANPATH,NEW DELHI. 4. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF SECURITY (CA), BUREAU OF CIVIL AVIATION, SECURITY, MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIATION, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, A-WING, JANPATH BHAWAN, JANPATH, NEW DELHI. -APPELLANTS Versus 1. EX-ARMYMEN'S PROTECTION SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, SON OF LATE SHYAM BIHARI LAL, 105 W, KESHAV PALACE, KHAJPURA, POLICE STATION-SHASTRI NAGAR, DISTRICT-PATNA. -PETITIONER-RESPONDENT 2. THE DIRECTOR (SECURITY), AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA, HAJI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI. 3. AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR,JAI PRAKASH NARAYAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, PATNA. -RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS ******* For the Appellants : Mr. Sarva Deo Singh For the Respondents: M/s Y.V. Giri & Ashish Giri 4 28.08.2009 Heard Mr. Sarva Deo Singh for the appellants, and Mr. Y.V. Giri, for the respondents. 2 The present appeal has been filed by the Union of India and other Officials against the order dated 25th March, 2009 passed by the learned single Judge in CWJC no. 758 of 2009 whereunder the learned single Judge had issued direction to the present appellants to furnish certain documents and to the present contesting respondents to offer opportunity of post decisional hearing. It is not in dispute that thereafter the present appellants have already offered post decisional opportunity of hearing and passed a final order on 20th April, 2009 and confirmed the earlier order. Subsequent order has been challenged by the present respondents in CWJC no. 5221 of 2009. It is stated that such writ petition has subsequently been heard and judgment has been reserved on 20th May, 2009. The present appeal has been filed on 19th May, 2009. We do not think that there is any necessity to entertain this appeal as the question raised would be academic inasmuch as the impugned judgment of the learned single Judge has already been complied with by the present appellants. The Court is not expected to waste time in considering infructuous matter or academic matter. 3 Accordingly, we do not entertain this appeal. However, it is made clear that it would be open to the appellant to raise any question of law as and when necessary at the appropriate stage. (P.K. Misra, CJ.) (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) AAhmad