THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.497 of 2011 Dated:- 17.06.2011 Between:- Centenary Baptist Church, Hanamkonda And others …Petitioners AND Kolla Sanjay Prabhakar and others …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.497 of 2011 ORDER:- The petitioners herein are challenging the Docket Order dated 11.02.2011 passed in I.A.No.807 of 2010 in S.O.P.No.755 of 2010 by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Warangal. 2. The petitioners herein are the respondents and respondents 1 to 5 herein are the petitioners and in the impugned I.A. before the Court below. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be hereinafter referred to as they were arrayed in the impugned I.A. before the Court below. 3. The respondents 1 to 5 herein/petitioners filed I.A.No.807 of 2010 seeking appointment of a team of receivers comprising of the elderly and non-controversial members of the first respondent society for its day to day management. Their main case is that the elections to the Executive Committee of the first respondent, which were held on 30.06.2010, are void. It is also their case that even as per the altered rules and regulations of the first respondent society, no member, who had earlier held a post, is eligible to contest in the elections and, therefore, the election of respondents 2 to 17, who have previously held posts, is illegal. The petitioners have also alleged that the respondents are guilty of various financial irregularities of a serious nature and they have furnished the particulars of all those irregularities in the affidavit and alleged that huge amounts have been misappropriated by the respondents. 4. The petitioners herein/respondents’ field counter denying all the material allegations and the said application has coming up for enquiry. During the pendency of the said application, the respondents filed I.A.No.816 of 2010 before the District Judge, Warangal to implead four others as respondents 19 to 23 in the original petition contending that those proposed respondents were already elected along with the petitioners and, therefore, they are necessary parties to the O.P. Though the respondents have filed copy of the petition in I.A.No.816 of 2010 and the copy of the affidavit filed in support of the said petition, but they have not filed the copy of the counter filed by the petitioners in the said petition. 5. Be that as it is, as can be seen from the contents of the impugned order and as submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 5 herein/petitioners, the said proposed respondents were elected for the first time as Office Bearers of the first respondent society. According to the learned counsel, respondents 1 to 4 herein, who are the petitioners in O.P.No.755 of 2010 before the District Judge, Warangal, did not claim any specific relief against those proposed respondents and, therefore, they are not necessary parties to the main O.P. The Court below observed that the proposed parties have already remained ex parte and directed the petitioners herein to proceed with the matter. 6. I have perused the entire material on record and have no hesitation to hold that there is no illegality of irregularity in the impugned order passed by the Court below. The revision is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. 7. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed without any order as to costs. _________________________ Justice B.Chandra Kumar 17th June, 2011 Bvv Note:- Issue C.C. by 21.06.2011. (B/o) Bvv