1 WP 181/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 181 OF 2009 Vaibhav s/o Jagannath Sasne ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. ... Respondents. ------- Shri. Sujeet D. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri. Umakant K Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent No.1. Shri. D.P. Bakshi, Advocate for respondents Nos.2 to 5. ------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE: 16th JULY 2009 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) In the facts of the case we do not find that as of right the petitioner’s application alone should be considered. 2 WP 181/2009 3) In case the respondent - Jeevan Pradhikaran desires to appoint certain officers / law officers then they would follow the recruitment process as established by law. At this stage no interference is required in exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. 4) The writ petition is dismissed. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.181.09