:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.993 OF 2003 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2121 OF 2004 Arjundas K. Dodeja ....Plffs. ....Plffs. ....Plffs. vs. vs. vs. Bhagwandas Sons and Ors. .....Defnds. .....Defnds. .....Defnds. ------------- Ms. Shraddha Hemdev i/b. Makhija and Associates for the plaintiffs. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 22ND AUGUST 2005. P.C. : 1. The present suit is filed on the basis of two bill of exchange dated 5.10.98 and 28.10.98 for a sum of Rs.50,000/-. The defendants have filed vakalatnama and accordingly the present Summons for Judgment is taken out. Defendants are served. None appears for the parties and :2: accordingly I directed by my order dated 16.8.2005 to give fresh notice to the advocate for defendant no.1 and 2. A fresh notice is given. Advocate has produced the acknowledgment of the same. Inspite of the said notice none appears for the defendants. The plaintiff tenders an original compilation of documents. The same is taken on record and marked Ex.P.1 colly. 2. In the aforesaid circumstances, Summons for Judgment made absolute. Suit is decreed as prayed. 3. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs undertakes to file affidavit of service as well as service of notice as directed by the court within a period of one week from today. Zerox of notice and acknowledgement is taken on record. sd/- **************