1 upa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1780 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1780 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1780 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.1576 OF 2006 Eastern Stell Industries ).. Plaintiff Versus M/s.Technis Industries and others ).. Defendants Mr.Rajeev Kumar with Mr.V.C. Bodke i/b.M/s.Chitnis Vaity & Co. for the Plaintiff. Mr.A.V. Bajaj with Mr.R.S. Raymond and Mr.V.P. Shastri i/b.M/s.Raymond & Co. for Defendant Nos.1, 2 and 4. Mr.Arshad Hidayatullah with Mr.Birendra Saraf and Mr.Nirav Shah i/b.DSK Legal for Defendant No.3. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 27TH JUNE 2006 DATED : 27TH JUNE 2006 DATED : 27TH JUNE 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The document on which the Plaintiff relies is a Memorandum of Understanding under which the Plaintiff claims it agreed to purchase the suit property. The Plaintiff also claims to have paid the entire consideration. The Plaintiff is claiming possession pursuant to the document. A development agreement has been entered into between Defendant Nos.1 and 2 and Defendant No.3 pursuant to which Defendant No.3 claims to be in possession. It is not in dispute that the document on which the Plaintiff basis its claim is not 2 registered. 2. Hence, no ad-interim relief. 3. Reply to be filed within four weeks from today. Rejoinder, if any, to be filed within two weeks thereafter. Motion made returnable after eight weeks.