IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 29TH MARCH 2010 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 10625 of 2010(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- MOHAMMED, S/O.UMMER, THARIPPALAPARAMBIL HOUSE, KASRASSERRY P.O., 673 602, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.FIROZ RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ THE SECRETARY, KARASSERRY GRAMA PANCHAYATH KARASSERRY, KOZHIKODE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 10625 OF 2010 (C) ===================== Dated this the 29th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that on the strength of Ext.P1 permit, he constructed a residential building. According to the petitioner, although construction was fully in compliance with Ext.P1 and the approved plan, Panchayat issued Ext.P2 requiring the petitioner to demolish the construction on the allegation that the construction was made deviating from the plan approved by it. Ext.P2 was followed by Ext.P3. On receipt of the aforesaid communications, petitioner filed his objections by Ext.P4. It is stated that orders have not been passed on Ext.P4. It is at that stage the petitioner has filed this writ petition apprehending that without considering Exts.P2 and P3 in the light of Ext.P4, the Panchayat might demolish the structure. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, on receipt of Exts.P2 and P3, he has filed Ext.P4 objection, necessarily, the Panchayat should consider Ext.P4 and pass orders thereon. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing the respondent to consider Exts.P2 and P3 in the light of Ext.P4 WPC No. 10625/10 :2 : objection filed by the petitioner and with notice to him. It is directed that until orders are passed as above, further proceedings pursuant to Exts.P2 and P3 will be kept in abeyance. Petitioner shall immediately produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp