IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.738 of 2010 1. Shri Jai Kishore Prasad Singh S/O Late Ram Lakhan Singh R/O Vill -P.O. Uphroll, P.S.Desari,Distt-Vaishali Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Human Resources Department Through Its Secretary Patna Secretariat, Patna, 3. Secretary, Higher Education Department, Patna Secretariat, Patna 4. Bhim Rao Ambedkar, Bihar University through its Vice Chancellor, Muzaffarpur 5. Vice Chancellor ,B.R.A.B.U. Muzaffarpur 6. Registrar,B.R.A.B.U. Muzaffarpur 7. Incharge Principal, B.P.S.College Desari 8. Secretary, Governing Body, B.P.S.College Desari, Distt- Vaishali ---------------------------------- 5. 29.8.2011. Heard Mr. Amit Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Harendra Kumar Tiwary, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent noss.4 to 6. The petitioner is a founder member of the Bir Chandra Patel Smarak Mahavidayalay, Desari, Vaishali having donated 2.27 acres of land for the establishment of the College, which took place in 1983. It is not in dispute that the said College is affiliated with the Bihar University in the year 1987. 2 The grievance of the petitioner is that whereas Section 60 of the Bihar University Act, 1976 providing for constitution of the Governing Body of the college, inter alia, also provides for appointment of a donor’s representative in the Governing Body, to be elected by the donors from amongst themselves but despite the mandate of section 60(1)(v) of the Act, the University has taken no steps for appointment of a donor’s representative in Governing Body of the college. Today, a second supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Bihar University and in which they have enclosed the status report dated 25.8.2011 issued by the Registrar of the University mentioning therein that the University would complete the process of appointment of a donor’s representative for the Governing Body of the college in question within a period of three months. Considering the submissions made by the Registrar of the University, in the second supplementary counter affidavit filed 3 today, the grievance of the petitioner as set out in para-1 of the writ petition, stands redressed. The writ petition thus stands disposed of in view of the categorical stand taken by the Registrar of the respondent University on the issue raised by the petitioner. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)