HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI C.R.P. No:2872 OF 2010 Dated: 9.7.2010 Between: 1. Mohd Maqsood Ali and others ..Petitioners And 1. The Additional Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Secunderabad Division, North Zone, Secunderabad and another. .. Respondents. This Court made the following HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI C.R.P. No:2872 OF 2010 ORDER: This revision petition is directed against the order dated 15.6.2010 passed in CMA.No.36 of 2009 by the I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad confirming the order dated 7.10.2009 passed in I.A.No.165 of 2008 in O.S.No.262 of 2008 by the learned XIII Additional Senior Civil Judge (FTC), City Civil Court, Secunderabad. The petitioners herein are the plaintiffs and the respondents are the defendants before the Court below. For the sake of convenience, the status of the parties will hereinafter be referred to as arrayed in the suit. The plaintiffs filed I.A.No.165 of 2008 in O.S.No.262 of 2008 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 r/w Section 151 CPC seeking to grant temporary injunction restraining the defendant-Corporation, its employees, subordinates, workmen and any person or persons acting under it from demolishing or otherwise the suit schedule property in any manner. The Court below dismissed the above application with costs. Hence, the plaintiffs carried the matter in appeal in CMA No.36 of 2009 before the lower appellate Court. The lower appellate Court also dismissed the CMA with costs. Hence, the present revision is filed by the petitioners-plaintiffs. Heard the learned Counsel and perused the material available on record. The material on record goes to show that the petitioners- plaintiffs without obtaining permission from the defendant-Corporation raised cellar + two upper floors in the schedule property and that the application of the plaintiffs for regularization of unauthorized constructions under the BPS scheme was rejected. From this, it can be said that the plaintiffs got knowledge about the unauthorized constructions. However, irrespective of the fact as to whether the plaintiffs raised unauthorized constructions or not, the present facts and circumstances of the case, do not disclose any prima facie case in favour of the petitioners-plaintiffs. Therefore, I feel that the orders of the Courts below do not suffer from any illegality or irregularity warranting any interference by this Court. Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ____________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari Date: 9th July, 2010 Nn. HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI C.R.P. Nos:2872 OF 2010 09.07.2010