1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1295 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1295 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1295 OF 2007 Ramadhar Ramgarib, .. Petitioner. Vs 1. Rev.Father Joseph and ors. .. Respondents Mr Vipin Mishra, for the petitioner. (absent). CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATED : 06th JULY, 2007 DATED : 06th JULY, 2007 DATED : 06th JULY, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. This petition was heard by the lerned Single Judge on 13.4.2007 when the following order was passed. "The question raised in this petition is in respect of order passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court, directing that chamber summons and two notices of motion would be taken up for hearing in chronological order. Advocate R.S.Mishra i/b Vipin Mishra, who is also present in the court seeks an adjournment saying that Advocate Navin Parikh has been instructed by them and he is not available today. it is tragic that the question of the order in which the applications are required to be decided by the Judge of City Civil Court, should have been dragged into this court by filing a writ petition, and the further tragedy is that the counsel seeks an adjournment after the matter was already adjourned twice. Since the counsel insists that the matter has to be argued by Adv.navin Parikh, in order to leave the client with a satisfaction of having his matter argued by the counsel of his choice, the matter be adjourned to 27th April, 2007 by way of last chance." 2 2 2 Today when the matter was called out, none appeared for the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid order and that none appeared for the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed for nonprosecution. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)