2- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MACA No.52/2010 Date of Decision; Tulv 02. 2010 DILIP KUMAR Appellant through Mr. O.N.Sharma, Advocate versus ^ UNITEDINDIAINSURANCECO LTD &ORS Respondents through Mr, D.K.Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.l. CORAM: HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE REKHA SHARMA 1. Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the 'Digest'? REKHA SHARMA. T. (ORAL) It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that while computing compensation, the learned Claims Tribunal has not taken into consideration the percentage of disability suffered by the injured and the loss of earning on account thereof. The learned counsel for the Insurance Company does not dispute that while assessing the loss of earning, the aforesaid factors ought to have been taken into consideration and admits that had the Tribunal taken the same into account, the loss of earning would have come to Rs.1,82,000/- as against Rs.1,50,000/-. The difference, thus, is of Rs.32,000/- only. MACA No.52/2010 Page 1 of 2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified : 5 In view of the above, the Insurance Company is directed to pay to the appellant the difference of Rs.32,000/- and also an additional sum of Rs.8,000/- stated to have been incurred by the appellant towards his further medical treatment. The amount shall be paid within four weeks from now along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of the filing of the petition till realization. The appeal is disposed of. Dasti. i REiaiA SHARMA, J. ' JULY 02, 2010 PC/ka c-yo ' 17^/1J/o - MACA No.52/2010 Page 2 of 2