Cr.M.M.O No. 26 of 2006 15.12.2008 Present: Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.J.S.Guleria, Law officer, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Raj Paul Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. M. S. Guleria, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Cr.M.P.No.785 of 2008 & Cr.M.M.O.No.26 of 2006 The respondent-State has moved an application seeking permission to file the challan against the petitioner in the court, as the investigation revealed the involvement of the petitioner for the offences under sections 420, 467, 479, 471 & 120-B of the Indian Penal Code along with his co-accused. In fact vide order dated 17.3.2006, this court had ordered that investigation in the FIR in question may go on if respondents No.1 and 2 decide to do so, but no final action shall be initiated against the petitioner without the leave of this court. Now as per the result of investigation the petitioner is found to have been involved in this case, therefore, the interim order passed on 17.3.2006 is vacated. The application Cr.M.P.No. 785 of 2008 stands allowed, thus disposed of. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the main petition at this stage, with a liberty to take all the points raised in this petition as well as the other grounds if available to the petitioner, at the time of considering the matter on charge. In view of this the main petition is dismissed, as not pressed, with the above liberty. Miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of. December 15, 2008 (Surinder Singh),J. (D)