1 CriA-295-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 295 OF 2010 Lalitkumar Mohanlal Kanaya ... Applicant Vs. Mrs. Savita Lalitkumar Kanaya nee Ms. Savita Chander Chhugani & Anr. ... Respondents Mr. Dharmendra Joshi,Advocate, for the applicant. Ms. Savita Lalitkumar Kanaya, respondent No.1 in person present in Court. Smt.A.A.Mane, APP, for the respondent respondent No.2 - State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 10th August, 2010. P.C. 1. The Consent Terms marked "X" are signed by the Advocate for the applicant and the respondent No.1 in person, who is identified by the Advocate for the applicant. 2. The parties inform that divorce has already taken place between them and they have settled their disputes. The respondent No.1 also makes a statement that she does not want to prosecute the criminal case. 3. In view of the consent terms and the above statement, the proceedings in Criminal Case No.3084/PW/2008 pending on the file of the Metropolitan 2 CriA-295-10.sxw Metropolitan Magistrate, 17th Court at Borivli, Mumbai, stands quashed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)