IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 29258 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: November 15, 2010. Surinder Kumar ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. M.K.Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.D.Sachdeva, Addl.A.G., Punjab. Mr. Mohd. Yusuf, Advocate for the complainant. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) CRM No.59031 of 2010 Requests for placing on record amended petition on the plea that subsequently offences under Sections 420/467/471/120-B IPC were also added. Application is allowed and the amended petition is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. CRM application stands disposed of. CRM No.M-29258 of 2010 CRM No.M-29258 of 2010 The present petition is for regular bail filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.122 dated 09.08.2010, under Sections 406/465/468/420/467/471/120-B IPC, registered at Police Station City Malerkotla, District Sangrur. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in this case on account of civil dispute between the petitioner and complainant and that he has been continuing in custody since 03.09.2010. It has been stated by learned counsel for the State that though investigation of this is complete and however, challan could not be filed as inquiry is pending with higher police authorities as to whether petitioner is involved in this case. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Surinder Kumar is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Sangrur. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) November 15, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2