1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLN. NO. 2823 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1242 of 2009 Smt. Anjanabai Chandrakant Kamthe & Ors. .. Applicants vs. Shri Prith Pal Singh Bharara & Ors. .. Respondents Shri Vipin R.Kasle, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Amit Borkar, advocate fr the respondent No.1. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 7th October, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. First Appeal is already admitted. C.A. is filed for stay to the execution of the decree for specific performance of the contract. 3. The learned Counsel for the respondent contends that on the basis of the decree, a sale deed has been executed by the trial Court in favour of the respondent/plaintiff on behalf of the defendant/appellant. He contends that in the sale deed, there is a mention that the possession is given. However, no possession receipt or any other document is produced. There is no document to show that the decree for possession has been actually executed. According to the 2 appellant, there is a shed of the appellant on that land. 4. Therefore, pending the appeal, the parties shall maintain status quo and shall not create any third party interest nor develop the same. Application stands disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)