RSA No. 148 of 2000. 15.12.2010 Present: Mr. Jagan Nath, vice counsel for the appellant. Mr. Vikrant Chandel vice counsel for respondent No.5. The learned counsel for the appellant has stated that respondent No. 6 has died in the year 2002. The factum of death of respondent No. 6 has already come on record on 22.10.2010, but despite that no steps have been taken for bringing on record the legal representatives of respondent No. 6. The respondent No. 6 was plaintiff No. 2 alongwith appellant who was plaintiff No. 1 in the suit and the suit was decreed by the trial court on 15.1.1998. The learned District Judge on 18.11.1999 set-aside judgement and decree dated 15.1.1998, allowed the appeal and dismissed the suit against respondent No. 1 herein. The judgement and decree dated 18.1.1999 against respondent No. 6/ plaintiff No. 2 has become final in absence of legal representatives of respondent No. 6. The appeal by appellant in absence of legal representatives of respondent No. 6/ plaintiff No. 2 is not competent. Hence, in absence of legal representatives of respondent No. 6/ plaintiff No.2, the appeal stands abated. December 15, 2010. ( Kuldip Singh ), (Hem) Judge.