^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition No.2998 of 2003 PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS: iNTERVENERS: 2. 3. 5. 6. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Mangal Singh, aged about 49 years, S/o Dheer Sai, Dhanuhar Tribal resident of village Dhodhatarai, Tehsil Kartala, District Korba (Chhattisgarh) Versus Board of Revenue, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Chhattisgarh, Naresh Singh, S/o Prithvipal Singh Kamlesh Singh, S/o Prithvipal Singh Both residents of Jelgaon, Tehsil Katghora, Distt. Korba (Chhattisgarh) Fatte Singh S/o Ghasiram, resident of village Kartali, Tehsil Pali, District Korba (Chhattisgarh) The Collector, Korba, District Korba (Chhattisgarh) Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Katghora, District Korba (Chhattisgarh) Kamesh Yadav, aged about 36 years, S/o Hariram Yadav, R/oVinayak Auto Shop No.4, Jailgaon, Thana Katghora, Korba. Pramod KumarAgrawal, aged 37 years, S/o Hari Prakash Agrawal, R/o Ravi Metal Stores, Shop No.3, Jailgaon, Thana Katghora, Korba. Sourab Shukla, aged 19 years, S/o Virendra Shukla, R/o Bhai-Bhai Fashion Shop No.1, Jaitgaon, Thana Katghora, Korba. Mahesh Koushal, aged 34 years, S/o N.C. Koushat, R/o Shop No.9, Jailgaon, Thana Katghora, Distt.- Korba. Ramesh Koushal, aged about 30 years, S/o N.C. Koushal, Shop No.8, Sapna Ladies Needs, Jailgaon, Thana Katghora,Distt. Korba. Raju Kushari, aged about 35 years, S/o N.C. Kushari, Shop No.5 and 6 Archana Readymade Jailgaon, Thana Katghora, Distt. Korba {Writ petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India} Soma Present: Mr. Ravindra Agrawal, counsel for the petitioner. None present for respondent No.1. Mr. Devendra Pratap Singh, counsel for respondents No.2 & 3. Mr. Shree Kumar Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anand Kumar Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.4. Mr. Sumit Jhanwar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents No.5 & 6. Mr. Parag Kotecha, counsel for the interveners. Sinqle Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma. J ORDER (14-2-2012) 1, I.A.No.1 for taking documents on record is allowed. Documents are taken on record. 2. By this writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged legality and propriety of the order dated 30-6-2003 passed by the Board of Revenue, Bilaspur in Revision Case No.230/A-23/ 2002-03. 3. The impugned order has already been challenged before this Court in W.P. No.634/2006 (Naresh Singh and another v. Board of Revenue and others) in which the petitioner herein was respondent No.2 (therein) and the said writ petition was dismissed vide order dated 9-1-2008. 4. In the light of order dated 9-1-2008 passed in W.P.No.634/2006, the petition as framed is not maintainable and the same is dismissed as not maintainable. No order as to costs. However, the petitioner may redress his grievances in appropriate manner. 5. Consequently, M.(W.)P.No.2743/2003, I.A.Nos.711/2006 & 2 stand disposed of. — Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge