IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 1st day of June, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 536 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Tajwar Singh .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party With Ist Bail Application No. 541 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Beena Devi .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Part Arising out of Case Crime No. 648/2010, U/s 304/201 IPC, PS Kotdwara, District Pauri Garhwal. June 01, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Since both these bail applications pertain to same crime number involving common incident, hence these bail applications are being decided by this common order. Heard Mr. Siddharth Sah and DCS Rawat, Advocates for the applicants and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned Counsel for the accused applicants argued that the applicants are not named in the FIR. It was further argued that the case against the applicants rests upon the circumstantial evidence and the I.O. has not collected any evidence to connect them with the alleged crime and the chain of circumstances is not complete to connect the applicants with the alleged crime. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicants deserve bail at this stage. Let the applicants Tajwar Singh and Smt. Beena Devi be released on bail on executing a personal bond and 2 furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, by each of them to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 1.6.2010 PRABODH