IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 28TH JANUARY 2011 / 8TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 2093 of 2011(J) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ ELIAMMA,AGED 60 YEARS,D/O.T.DANIEL, G/5 THOTTAMATTAM,PUDUPARIYARAM,PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR OF INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND GENERAL MANAGER,DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE,PALAKKAD-678 001. 2. THE PALAKKAD DISTRICT GOLD WORKERS INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, NO.C-IND(P)133,PALAKKAD,REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT,SHRI.PADMANABHAN-678 014. 3. THE ADMINISTRATOR,THE PALAKKAD DISTRICT GOLD WORKERS INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, NO.C-IND(P)133,PALAKKAD-678 014. 4. THE ARBITRATOR AND CO-OPERATIVE INSPECTOR OFFICE OF GENERAL MANAGER,DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE,PALAKKAD-678 001. R1 & R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BASANT BALAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/01/2011 ALONG WITH WPC.NO.2094 OF 2011 AND WPC.NO. 2095 OF 2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) Nos. 2093, 2094 & 2095 OF 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioners in these writ petitions are persons who have deposited money in the second respondent society. When the money deposited was not refunded, they filed arbitration cases before the first respondent. The Arbitrator allowed the arbitration cases and passed Ext.P2 award. It is stated that awards have become final. The petitioners thereupon moved the first respondent under section 76(3) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act read with rule 74(1) of the rules for execution of the awards. The execution petitions were filed on November, 2010. These writ petitions are filed aggrieved by the delay on the part of the first respondent in taking steps to execute the awards. 2. When the writ petition came up for hearing today, Sri. U.Balagangadharan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that after these writ petitions were filed, the execution petitions were returned as defective for the reason that execution petitions were not filed in the prescribed form and copies of the original award were not produced along with the execution petitions. WPC Nos.2093, 2094 & 2095/2011 2 In such circumstances, as the petitioners are yet to take steps in accordance with law to execute the award, no relief can be granted in these writ petitions except to observe that in the event of the petitioners filing appropriate petitions for execution of the respective awards before the first respondent, the first respondent shall take expeditious action thereon in accordance with law. The writ petitions are disposed of as above. P.N.RAVINDRAN, (JUDGE) vps WPC Nos.2093, 2094 & 2095/2011 3 WPC Nos.2093, 2094 & 2095/2011 4