IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.903 of 2005 Between: The Urban Huts and Slum Dwellers Development Association, rep.by its General Secretary Syed Ismail, S/o.S.A.Khadar, ..... Petitioner AND 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Uppal Mandal R.R.District and two others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.TULASI DAS Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE GP FOR ASSIGNMENT The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in proposing to dispossess the members of the petitioner’s Association by way of demolishing the existing structures in the assigned land in Sy.No.58 of Fathullaguda Village, Uppal Mandal, R.R.District as being discriminatory, arbitrary, bad in law, violative of the right to freedom of movement and violative of right to life as guaranteed under Articles 14,15,19 and 21 of the Constitution of India apart from being violative of the judgments rendered by this Hon'ble Court and consequently direct the respondents to induct the remaining beneficiaries into physical possession in terms of the Judgment passed in W.P.No.14377/2001 dt.3.9.2001 and to pass such other order or orders.” At the hearing, Sri S.Tulasi Das, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as the members of the petitioner Association were already evicted, the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as such. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, interim order, dated 27.01.2005 is vacated, W.P.M.P.No.1191 of 2005 is dismissed and W.V.M.P.No.949 of 2005 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 30.12.2008 va