4 ^f- 5=^2— IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETmON (S) N0. •2-<5 -^-QF 2007 PETmONERS s ..••'t^ ^'" ..• .••:"^-''~ / -, y^cy' / K^ ^y ^.^ ^•<;'' y J^'\ ..-• '^/ :»y .?-'>J:-: ~~s^. ^ '& & V's^^W3Ls^ "~ 9 ®.x SSV-' RESPQNDENTS 1, Smt. S.anjulata Sinha wife of Shri Rakesh Kumar Sinha, aged about 37 years, Occupation Service, Presently working as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Shivnandanpur, Block Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). 2. Smt. Philomina Ekka wife of Shri Birendra Masih, aged 40 about years, Occupation Service, Presently working as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School Shivnandanpur, Block Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). 3. Hermanus Minj Son of Shri Alwis Minj, aged about 38 years, Occupatioh Service, Presently working as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Nayanpur, Block Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. , The Director, Public Instructions, Raipur(C.G-). ^^wf^- ^^^^ :^ The District Education Officer, Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). 4^-- The Block Education Officer, Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). WRFT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226KOF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI. PROHIBITION ETC. .R~ ''.";- • ^i.'^ i*?='.s^?-?.f>F..'' HISH COURT OF CHH^TTISS^RH AT BILAS>UR W. P. (&} No. 257 of 2007 Petitioners : Smt. Sanjulatn Sinha ond others Versus State of Oihattisgarh and o-thers SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Mr. V. Vijay, Advocate for the petitioner. Miss Sunita Jnin, Panel iawyer for the responden+s/State. OR&ER (passed on 19th day of Januo.ry, 2007) The following order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotr'i. J. 1. Leamed counse! e^ipearing for the petitioners as weit as leamed Ponel Lawyer appearing for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts of the pre^nt case are similar to 1+iat of in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006 (Sushil Tiwari & oihers Vs. State Govt. of Chhatf-isgarh & oihers), uritidi was alloweS vi<le or<ler dated 7t November, 2006. TTiey furlher submit that the question of taw involved is also the aune. 2^ In view of tiie above stated submissions made by Jeamed counset for the parties, the writ petition is atlowed in terms of the order dated 7th November, 2006 passed by -this Court in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006. No order as to costs. Bablu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge