( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3322 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3322 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3322 OF 2007 The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant. Versus Mr.Raju Kanhyalal Khetwani & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for applicant. None for respondents. ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3324 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3324 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3324 OF 2007 The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant. Versus Mr.Suraj Parmar .. Respondent. Ms.A.T.Javeri, A.P.P. for applicant. None for respondents. ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3326 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3326 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3326 OF 2007 The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant. Versus Mr.Manish Devkinandan Khandelwal .. Respondent. Mr.H.J.Dedhia, A.P.P. for applicant. None for respondents. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 25th April, 2008. DATED : 25th April, 2008. DATED : 25th April, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned A.P.P.s for the applicant - State. None for the respondents as notice not issued. 2. The respondents had the benefit of the order dated 3.7.2007 by which they were granted anticipatory bail. The offences involved relate to Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 r/w. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is required to be mentioned that the FIR ( 2 ) complainant, who had complained to the E.O.W. has not come forward to challenge the order of grant of anticipatory bail. The State has also not proceeded to arrest the present respondents for the reasons best known to the E.O.W. In a set of these circumstances, I am of the view that right now, no case for cancellation of anticipatory bail is made out and the applications are required to be dismissed in limine. Hence the order. a) Application Nos.3222 of 2007, 3324 of 2007 and 3326 of 2007 are dismissed in limine. (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)