IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MISCELLANEOUS-APPEALNO. ^ I /2010 S^^-^^m' APPELLANT Plaintiff ^^ \J<^^\ Y^09' >:-L"..^A^> ^'" ^^ :^ ^^' ^^f^ .^.^'^ %^"^'^ ^•^^ v>4"" VERSUS Bhupendra Tamaskar, S/o late Krishna Rao Tamsakar, aged about 68 years, R/o Tilak Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 1. Shri Nagendra, aged about 57 Defendants years, S/o late Shri Nilkanth Tamaskar, Occupation Service Central Bank of India Mumbai, 2. Smt. Sushila Tamskar, W/o late Late Shri Nilkanth Rao Tamakar, aged about 82 years, Both are R/o F-31 Central Complex, Behind S.T. Workshop, Parera Nagar, Panch Pakdi, Thane, Mumbai (Maharashtra) 3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Collector, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 fr ) OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE. 3^T'?FT^fhF Tf^TT ^n^T 5^^i^ -*- ^/^ INN(; ^ 4 ^; N1*1^1 51»*<|Ch ?%r':=^pn^Fr, ytiiwKo, f®i<riwl|< ..^.o.:....5.^&0.^ 200 3TT^?T XF^F ('<i^f35t^T) 5'wiW ^f^a ^H^T ^.B. Hon'bie Shri Justsce N.K. ^aarwai 12.09.2011 Shri Anup Majumdar, coi Smt. Renu Kochar, coura Shri S.R.J. Jaiswal, Pa |nse! for the appeiiant. ^e! for respondent No.1. hel Lavvyer for the State/respondent No.2. Learned counse! appeal may be disposed of dir^cting vvlthln a speclfied time frame. Prayer Is reasonable anc| Accordingjy, the misc. ^ court Is dlrected to decide th< wlthjna period ofsix months order. No order as to costs. appear(ng for the appeliant submjts that this the triai Court to declde the sult is aiiowed. (ppeal stands disposed of. The tria! suit as eariy as possibie preferably the date of receipt of a copy of thjs frbm ^ <sM<4{<n<ili 'W^ff ^ "fe^ <Fn^i< '^3TRW3H^T Sd/- N.K.Agrawal Judge