IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14086 of 2010 Date of Decision: May 29, 2012 Ashok Nanda ..... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others ..... RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT . . . 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? . . . PRESENT: - Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Sandeep Khunger, Advocate, for respondent No.3. . . . Surya Kant, J (Oral) 1. Learned State counsel states that reversal order has since been withdrawn, rendering this petition as infructuous. 2. This writ petition is disposed of as infructuous CWP No.14086 of 2010 [2] with a clarificatory direction that retiral benefits of the petitioner be fixed keeping in view that he retired from the promotional post of Assistant Corporation Engineer. Needful shall be done within a period of four months. (Surya Kant) May 29, 2012 Judge avin