1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirty First day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14138 of 2011 T.THIRUGANAM ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED-9 Vs STATE REP.BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE C.C.I.W., NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. CR.NO.2 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.RAJASEKARAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for alleged offences under Sections 406, 408, 467, 468, 471, 477(A) r/w 120(B) IPC in Crime NO.2 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, the petitioner has come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of prosecution, the petitioner was working as Legal-cum-Inspection Officer in the Co-operative Primary Agricultural and Rural Development Bank, Moonjirai. It is stated that during the period between 17.03.2001 and 31.03.2001, a sum of Rs.2,70,000/- was found unaccounted for properly. An enquiry was conducted under Section 81 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act and based on the same, the present complaint has been given. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence and he is no responsible for any amount. According to the petitioner, he is only the Legal Officer of the bank. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.I have considered the above submissions. 5.Having regard to the fact that all the transactions are borne out by records and the transactions were pertaining to the year 2001, besides the fact that the petitioner is only the Legal Officer of the bank and all other attendant circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but with conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kuzhithurai on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 31/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, KUZHITHURAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, C.C.I.W., NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. V.RAJASEKARAN Advocate SR.No.37186 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14138 of 2011 Date :31/10/2011 TR :01.11.2011: 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/