THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5098 OF 2009 DT.29.04.2010 Between: Darapaneni Kesava Rao ……..Petitioner Vs. Sir Sringeri Jagadguru Mahasamsthanam, represented By its Honourary Agent Ch.Jagan Mohan Rao ……………..Respondents. O R D E R: Heard Sri P.Gopal Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri P.R.Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. At the instance of both the learned counsel, the revision petition is being disposed of. The present revision petition is filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated 07.10.2009 passed in I.A.No.1947 of 2009 in R.C.C.No.1 of 2009 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, wherein and whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order 8, Rule 3 (a) and Section 151 C.P.C., seeking to condone the delay in filing the documents and to receive the same was dismissed on the ground that the documents showing the payment of rents are not relevant. On hearing both the learned counsel and on perusing the material placed before this court, I am of the view that at the time of receipt of documents into court, merits cannot be gone into nor such documents can be refused to be received and if at all there is any objection with regard to the relevance, the same can be pointed out at the time of marking the documents. Therefore, the application at the present stage is pre-mature. Normally, such applications are usually allowed without going into the merits of any document. The revision petition is, therefore, allowed. The order passed in I.A.No.1947 of 2009 dated 07.10.2009 is set aside and the I.A. is allowed. It is made clear that the respondent herein is entitled to raise any such objections to which he is entitled to under law and on filing such objections, the same may be considered by the court below. No costs. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO J., Dt.29.04.2010 tjs