CWP(T) No. 5805/2008 (OA 1412/99) 17.05.2010 Present: Mr. R. D. Kaundal, Advocate, vice Mr. A. K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. M. Bisht, Dy. Advocate General and Mr. P. M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General, for the respondents/State. Petitioner has prayed for the following relief:- “(i) That the respondents may be ordered to give officiating allowance to the applicant w.e.f. Ist July, 1990 onwards with all the benefits incidental thereof such as arrears etc. (ii) That the records of the case may be summoned in the interest of justice. (iii) That any other relief to which the applicant may be found entitled may also be granted.” 2. In the reply the respondents admit that the petitioner had in fact discharged the duties of Superintendent Grade-II during the period 16.4.1990 up to 2.6.1990 when the Assistant Manager (Post redesignated as Superintendent Grade-II) had proceeded on earned leave. Simply because a person is asked to hold additional charge would not automatically entitle him for monetary benefits. 3. Petitioner has not placed on record the order whereby he was asked to discharge the duties of Superintendent Grade-II entitling him to the monetary benefits. His reliance on letter dated 19/21-1-1993, annexed by the State also does not clarify that he was entitled to monetary benefits. That apart this letter was issued in the year 1993, much after petitioner had ceased to hold the additional -2- charge of Superintendent Grade-II. Under what circumstances the same was issued is also not clear. 4. No legally enforceable right of the petitioner stands violated. Hence the present petition without any merit is dismissed. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. May 17, 2010 (PK)