CLMA Interim Relief Application No. 8613 of 2008 In WPCRL No. 1014 of 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Mr. Manish Arora, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent no. 1 and 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a Mandamus directing the respondent no. 1 and 2 to safeguard the life and liberty f the petitioners and further directing the respondent no. 3 not to interfere in the married life of the petitioners. The petitioners have a remedy before the State Government on the administrative side, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition. However, it is open for the petitioners to approach the State Government, if any action is due on the part of the police agency. On failure on the part of the State Government in taking any step regarding protection of the life and liberty of the petitioners, the petitioners may approach this Court. The petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. (Sudhanshu Dhulia) (P.C. Verma, J.) 18.12.2008 18.12.2008 Rathour