//§ Cg $7 QIGH COURT OF JUDIC/XTUPF CF‘F?AT¢I§ARV AT PIILAIEPUF? mam. 3w /2oo3./ Shri Gandheshwarnath Mahadev Mandir, Sirpur Trust , Through l-r Managing Tpuvstee -' QhgLBisan La]. Chandrakn‘ir " f Age<i about 63 yearS, ’ $/0 L&te Kanhaiy-alal Chandrakar, R/o Station Read, Mahasamun§ District Mahasamund (CG). VERSU3 x4 v Bhishmagiri 3/0 Ramgiri, Pujari; 2) Hemgiri 'S/‘O Ramgiri & other 3O Family Members Roth C/o Ganaheshwar Nath M§hadev Mandir, $irpur TruSt, Mahasamund, Distt.MahLs&mund (CG)§ (In the Qrr‘xer impugneé dateé ; 18.77.2003 it has been mentiimed that Hemgiri 5/‘1 Rangiri 5211630 Family Members, but the names 0f 3O pers~tms era not thErein x recard mentinned QV€r in thr? the sane application was n‘Wt which was filtd before the Registrar hence to give their details is net possihle for the petitioner) . 3) The Registrar, Public Trust & Collector, Mahasamund Dietrict : Mahasemund (CG) . 4) 3tate of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Reipxir‘ (CG) . if WRIT PETETION UNDE}? ARTICLE 226/??7 ’7F THE CONSTITUTION OF LN D Le Revenue Department,DK$ Bhawan, ‘ / . y HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA M SB: Hen’bie Sim $atish K. A#m'hot ' J. Present: Shri Anatad Dadariya, Advocate for the petitionér. Shri M.P. S. Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate for the State. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 18t day of October, 20 10) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner pleads no instructions. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In View ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want of 5x; mbgmfp.‘ ,g mgmtm ,M . \ WRIT PETITION No. 3111 (£2003 PETITIONRR Shri Gandheshwarnath Mahadev Mandir, Sil‘pur Tmst VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Bhishmagiri & Oihers Prosecution. u r Sd/. Satish K. Agm'hotrii ’ V, Judge 'ri