IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 18 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 285 OF 2006 GURUDAS B. PEDNEKAR, PANAJI-GOA. ....Applicant Versus MR. S.A. DESHPRABHU AND 2 ORS., ....Respondents Applicant In Person, Mr. Sudesh Usgaonkar, Advocate for R.3. Coram:- DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 11th September, 2006 P.C.: Heard the petitioner/applicant in person. We have perused the Order dated 8th August, 2006 against which review is sought. The petitioner, in person, states that the petitioner will not even serve a copy of this Review Petition on the respondent, as he has exhausted all his resources. We have perused our Order dated 8th August, 2006 which very clearly records that no case was made out and that constructive res-judicata would operate. Hence no case is made out for review. Review Petition stands dismissed. DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. sl.