1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.163 OF 2010. IN WRIT PETITION NO.644 OF 2009. Prerna Bapurao Bahe Vs. Ambadas Vamanrao Shelke, Secretary, Ajinkya Education Society and others .......................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................... Shri P.S. Patil, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri Y.P. Kaslikar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mrs. Rashi Deshpande, AGP for Respondent No.3. CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 25th JULY, 2011. The statement made in the affidavit filed by the respondent no.3 that the petitioner has been paid salary for the period from August, 2006 to 31.07.2008 which was of Rs.,123,659/- is not disputed by the petitioner. The petitioner has placed on record the affidavit stating that the petitioner had worked from 30.06.2008 to 31.01.2009. However, this position is disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the Management. The direction of this Court of which contempt is complained of is regarding submission of the pay bills by the respondent .....2/- 2 Nos.3 and 4 in respect of the petitioner for the entire period when the petitioner was in service. The case of the Management is that after 30.06.2008, the petitioner was not in service. In view of this, the petitioner is at liberty to adopt all such remedies as are available to him to claim benefits for the period from 30.06.2008 to 31-1-2009, during which period he was in service. In view of the aforesaid position, this contempt petition cannot proceed. The same are, therefore, dropped. JUDGE NSN ...../-