px€ENO..-. 2y IN THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPLB. WRIT pETITION N0. :7 /o2 v/ PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH ARTICLE 227 FOR ISSUANCE OP WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITAE WRIT OR WRITS ORDER OR ORDERS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. RajKumar S/o. Ralggrasad Aoe 25 years. Purushottam 3/0. Hira Ace 42 Years. Shlv Balak Bansor S/o. Ghanshyam Age 32 Years. Jalesh S/o. Narayan ‘Sahu [I Age 3O ears. Mum Ram S/o. Ramjl Sarthl Age 4O years. Bhulau S/o. Kejaha Sahu Age 4,5 years. Salik Ram S/o. Samelal Sahu Ae 3O years. 8. B/kuru Ram S/o. Saraha Sahu Age 32 years. 9. Shiv Shaner Bansor S/o. Banshi La Age 35 years. 10. P ETITIONERS : Santosh S/o. Dhani Ram Nai Age 32 years. ’11. Mohan S/o. Anjori Sahu Age 28 years. 12.- Manharan So. Jagoc Sahu Age 24 years. 13. Shatruhan S/o. Banshi Basor Age .28 years. 14. Dinesh S/o. Rugwa Yadav Age 30 years. 15. Duj Ram S/o. Kejha Age 28 years. 74 BL 2‘ y I g /: k l l / nun."‘ -2- 16. Buduk S/o. Punau Sahu Age 42 years. 17. Lalit S/o. Kangla ¥adav Age 35 years. 18. Latkhcr S/o. Dhalgan Sahu Age 32 Years. ‘19. Munna Lal S/o. Jhumuk Lal Earlvas‘ Age 42 years. 20. Budh Ram S/o. Sukhau 1 Age 45 Years. All R/o Vi1leoe Hardibandh rah. Loémi Dish. Bilaspur (c.G.) RESPONDENTS : 1 . The Registrar Co-Operative Societies ,State of C G Raipur.‘ 2. The Collector Bllaspur D1s1: BilaSpur (C G ) The Deputy Registrar Co—operative Soeieties, Bilaspur. 4. Pavan Das, Presldent Samuhlk Krlshl Sahakar1 Sanshthal‘ Sam1t1 Maryadlt Hardl Bandh P s. Donganya, rah. Lorml Dist. BilaSpur (C.G.) PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS. As given in the cause tle above. ti PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS. As given in the cause title above. PARTICULARS OF THE MATTER SSUBJECT) AGAINST WFDICH PETITION IS MADE. Petition is attracted against the deliberate partial acts of the respondents whereby the petitionershave been refrained from membership of SAMUHIK KRISHI SAHAKARI SANSHTHA (SAMITI) MARYADIT HABDI—BANDH 'i So to farm upon -3- Cg? -2— 16. Buduk S/o. Punau Sahu Max‘s. T? R.D.Drtlaro s/o t M) Comparative Insecqor the oz‘fice af Daputy Reigtrar, emoperatve societieas, Eiaspnr. hiah , va om p E g i l i w”.‘ V“ WW).wwmw i i ‘ 3X1—HC-22' i I 1 1 , Wm. W :P.:N07’é?‘ WW 2&0 q ma. m $Wm mmw ~ g d uin ta mtte t reef claime in th titio eme Ho i stae y he lear counse for te etitioners that the petitioers who al low th overt line ar entied tol allotent of lan an Other nits. If tht be o, it is for te petiiioners approach the apriate authorit undr t relevan provisos or seeing reef. The claim fr allotment and otr benehts canot be cs md by h ot in tese proceedings u i se such ap aon is moved, e hall be coided and dsposed f on heir own merits, in acrdance I i with relevant provisions. With the aforesaid obse anon/direction, the petition \stands . disposed of as infructuous. Consequently, I.A.Nos. 1716/02, 1716-A/O2, 66; 4/02, 1762/02 and 4685/02 also stand disposed of. ; W i a i1 ie r G r t S. Mdr hr, t f’ dly th t w p w aime 15.1 1;2002 Shr R.N.Jh, Counsel for 1é ietitionrs. Shri Ranbi Singh, ~.A. fo he tate Shri anina Sivastava Counsel for msponden No.3. Heard. ‘ Admitte, e Society. o hich membershi as; cld has one uner Eq‘datio. In is View of the ar, he li d e pen has bco i11&uctuous. wever, it s td b t ned l h p n e be e py e tl m d d beef a s h to ppro y e he t in f k li o he n oni e tis Cur h bt n ca p 'cti th same s nsre i o t co