IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2009 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 13809 of 2009(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- BEENA.A., D/O.KUMARAN, 'MANNIKKAM', AZHIYOOR, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.A.P.JUBYRAJ SRI.P.P.SUDHEER (ALUVA) SRI.VARGHESE K.PAUL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. VADAKARA CO-OPERATIVE RURAL BANK LIMITED NO.F 1264, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, V.O.ROAD, VADAKARA, PIN 673 101. 2. DEPUTY REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE VIGILANCE, O/O.DY.S.P., NORTH ZONE, KANNUR. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CO-OPERATIVE VIGILANCE (NORTH ZONE), DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BUILDING, KANNUR-1. 4. CO-OPERATIVE VIGILANCE OFFICER/ DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CO-BANK TOWERS PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. I.V. PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.13809 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 26th day of May, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that the first respondent Society had notified certain vacancies of Peons and Salesmen. According to the petitioner she was also an applicant. It is stated that along with other applicants, she was also called for written test which was held on 1.2.2009. It is stated that results were not published. But however, the Society conducted yet another written test on 9.2.2009, and is proceeding to make appointments of certain favoured candidates, who appeared in the written test held on 9.2.2009. According to the petitioner, the selection process starting from the examination held on 9.2.2009 is totally illegal and she has made Ext.P3 complaint to the 2nd respondent which has been forwarded to the 3rd respondent for investigation. The allegation in the writ Petition is that no action has been taken on Ext.P3. It is in these WP(c).No.13809/09 2 circumstances the writ petition has been filed. 2. On instruction Government Pleader submits that, so far no appointments has been made and that even the select list has not been finalized. It is stated that complaints were received from various quarters and the 3rd respondent conducting investigation into the allegations being investigated. 3. From the submission made by the Government Pleader, it is revealed that the allegation made by the Petitioner regarding the inaction on Ext.P3 and other complaints made against the selection process is incorrect. Now that the investigation by the 3rd respondent is continuing, I dispose of this writ Petition recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned Government Pleader and directing that the enquiry initiated shall be continued and concluded in accordance with law. (ANTONY DOMINIC) vi JUDGE WP(c).No.13809/09 3