1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. MCA No. 963 of 2011 In WP No. 5019 of 2010 Smt Ragini v. The Registrar General, HC and anr -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr S.J. Khandalkar, Adv for applicant Mr S.V. Manohar, Sr. Advocate for respondents Coram: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & A. P. BHANGALE, JJ Dated: 11th October 2011 1. Heard. Perused order dated 3rd February 2011 passed in Writ Petition No. 5019 of 2010. It is apparent that representation of petitioner dated 2.11.2001 for grant of time- bound/assured promotion in terms of Government Resolution dated 8th June 1995 was rejected by the District & Sessions Judge on 8.11.2001. Against that rejection, representation was made to the High Court on 14.6.2007 and that was rejected on 23.1.2009 and thereafter Writ Petition came to be filed before this Court for release of said promotion with effect from 31.3.1999. 2. On 3.2.2011 this Court noticed that petitioner was promoted as Senior Clerk with effect from 2.11.2003. It is apparent that in view of said promotion, the benefit of time- 2 bound promotion could not have been claimed on 11.10.2010 when Writ Petition No. 5019 of 2010 was filed. In view of the said development which was not disclosed in the petition but was pointed out by respondents in their reply dated 27.1.2011, this Court disposed of the petition vide order dated 3.2.2011. 3. Though in review petition it is contended that the Government Resolution dated 8th June 1995 has not been looked into by this Court while passing said order dated 3.2.2011, the circumstances in which the actual promotion granted with effect from 2.11.2003 was not or could not be pointed out, are not disclosed. We find that no case is made out for interference in review jurisdiction. MCA rejected. Judge. Judge joshi