IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 12TH JUNE 2007 / 22ND JYAISHTA 1929 Bail Appl..No. 3492 of 2007() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.538/07 OF KUNNAMKULAM POLICE STATION : PETITIONER: ---------------------------- PRADEEP, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. SUBRAMANIAN, MANDAKATHINKAL HOUSE, VETTUKKAD, ALOOR VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMACHANDRAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNNAMKULAM POLICE STATION, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR P.N.SUKUMARAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. No. 3492 OF 2007 ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 12th day of June, 2007 O R D E R Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail on the allegation that the Kunnamkulam police are at his heels in connection with Crime No.538/07 registered for offences punishable under sections 447, 324 and 308 read with section 34 IPC. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the 1st accused in the case and two other identifiable assailants had attacked the defacto complainant with iron rod, etc. and since none of the accused has been acquitted so far, it is not revealed so far as to whether the petitioner was involved in the occurrence. Since the petitioner has not so far been arrayed as an accused in the case, the apprehension of arrest and harassment entertained by the petitioner is unfounded. However, if the petitioner is hereafter arrayed as an accused in the case, he can very well approach the Magistrate concerned for regular bail. Leaving upon this right of the petitioner, this petition is dismissed. (V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE) aks