1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1633/2006 (Nakchhattar Singh Vs. Smt. Naseeb Kaur & Ors.) Date of order :: 05.03.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.J.S. Bhaleria, for the petitioner. Mr.O.P. Boob, Addl. Govt. Advocate. Mr.Dron Kaushik, for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The application under Order 22 Rule 3 and Order 1 Rule 10 CPC filed by one Mukhtyar Singh, who is alleged to be the power of attorney holder of late Smt. Naseeb Kaur, who filed the suit against the petitioner, is pending before the Assistant Collector cum S.D.O., Pilibanga. The applicant while showing order-sheets of the trial court submitted that on 04.04.2007, it was submitted on behalf of petitioner that in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1633/2006, an interim order dated 06.10.2006 has been passed in favour of petitioner by this Court. But on the next dates of hearing dated 30.05.2007 and 31.07.2007, though this Court has vacated the stay vide order dated 24.04.2007, but this fact was not brought 2 to the notice of the trial court. Therefore, in this petition, the applicant has filed an application for impleading him as a party respondent before deciding the said application. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, the applicant is directed to appear before the trial court and submit the certified copy of the order dated 24.04.2007 passed by this Court on the next date of hearing within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In that event, the trial court is directed to decide the application filed by the applicant under Order 22 Rule 3 and Order 1 Rule 10 CPC in accordance with law positively. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. A.K. Chouhan/-