IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11166/2008 Decided on:21.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Sher Bhadur. …Petitioner. Versus H.P. State Forest Corporation and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Bhupender Thakur, Advocate. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. Shashi Shirshoo submits that the case of the petitioner is covered by the judgment rendered by the learned erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in Ram Lal versus H.P. State Forest Corporation and another, O.A. No. 1445 of 2004 decided on 4.7.2005. 2. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in view of the principles laid down in above cited judgment, within a 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 period of two weeks, from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 3. In view of above directions, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 21.12.2010 *awasthi*