IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6037 of 2000 COLLEGE OF COMMERCE TEACHER'S ASSOCIATION PATNA & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4. 16.09.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the University. In this writ application preferred on behalf of College of Commerce Teachers’ Association through its Secretary the relief prayed for is: (a) to give due credit for the deductions against the provident fund subscription from the salary of the teachers but which has not been deposited in their respective account along with interest; (b) The claim of arrears for promotional benefits, arrears of UGC scheme, interim relief, dearness allowance arrears etc. to be ascertained and paid. The petitioners came to this Court earlier in CWJC No. 7746 of 1992 for the same relief as in item (a) when this Court by order dated 10.9.1994 disposed of the writ application with directions to deposit the deductions made to the provident fund account. Unfortunately the petitioners are again before this Court for the same relief. In this writ application filed in July 2000 Counsel for the University now prays for time to file counter affidavit. The Court is not inclined to adjourn the matter. The writ application is disposed with directions to the Vice Chancellor to ensure that the administrative acts which should have been performed in normal course but were not, compelling the institution of this writ application, are completed within a maximum period of four months and the provident fund deductions made from the salary of the teachers are deposited in their respective provident fund account within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order along with interest at the savings bank account rate.. The Court further directs the Vice Chancellor to examine the claim of the teachers as per item (b) above and pass appropriate orders thereupon in accordance with law and pay the dues, if any, within the like period. It is unfortunate situation where even for routine administrative acts Institutions which are supposed to be headed by learned persons failed to work unless there be orders of the High Court. Should the Vice Chancellor fail to do so he shall have only himself to blame considering that the petitioners have already given enough indication of their proposed course of action in paragraph 19 of the writ application The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)