IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3238 of 2009 1. NAVIN KUMAR @ NAVIN SAH, son of Gulab Sah 2. Pushpa Devi, wife of Navin Sah 3. Praveen Sah, son of Gulab Sah 4. Gulab Sah, son of Late Kutai Sah All resident of Station Road, Sultanganj, P.S.- Sultanganj, District Bhagalpur Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 07.04.2009 let the husband and the father-in-law of the complainant, namely, Praveen Sah and Gulab Sah be impleaded as petitioner nos. 3 and 4 in this application and vakalatnama filed on their behalf be taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 4 are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Section 498A and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioner no.3 is already in custody in the said case. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner no. 3, Praveen Sah as also other petitioners that notwithstanding the allegations in the complaint, they are ready and willing to continue the matrimonial relationship with the complainant and for that purpose they shall file written undertaking in the court below within four weeks from today. No sooner the aforesaid undertaking is filed in the court below, petitioners, Navin Kumar @ Navin Sah, 2 Pushpa Devi, Praveen Sah and Gulab Sah be admitted to the privilege of provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Rs. Five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Jamalpur P.S. Case No. 15 of 2008 and notice be issued to the complainant, Pinki Devi and once she appears, the petitioners in presence of the Court should persuade her to come back to the matrimonial home not only by words of mouth, but also with suitable gesture and conduct which should generate confidence in her. In the event complainant, Pinki Devi comes back to the matrimonial home or the matrimonial dispute is resolved or the complainant is found to be unreasonable, provisional bail allowed to the petitioners should be confirmed, failing which the court below shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law considering the reasonable of the stand of the parties. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioners. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)