IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8763 of 2011 DR.RAZIA HASAN (GULNAR), W/O MD. MAHMOODUL HASAN, RESIDENT OF BHIKHAMPUR, P.S. ISHAKCHAK, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, TILKAMANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 3. TILKAMANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR. 4. THE AUDITOR, TILKAMANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 5. THE AUDITOR, FOR THE STATE OF BIHAR, POSTED AT TILKAMANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 16.5.2011. Heard Shri Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Prabhu Narayan Sharma, learned A.C. to learned Advocate General, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 5 and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 to 4/Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 28.2.2010 as Professor (Zoology) from Post Graduate Department, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur Univewrsity, has prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of his retiral dues in view of U.G.C. scale (revised pay scale) and also for direction to pay (a) Arrear of amount of Gratuity that amount is approximately 3,50,000/- in which only 3,32,000/- has 2 been paid and rest 18,000/- is dues, (b) Arrear of provident fund amount i.e. Rs.22,600/-, (c) Arrear amount of Group Insurance, (d) Arrear amount of Leave Encashment for 208 days, (e) Arrear amount of 50% merger of D.a. and (f) Arrear of difference amount of salary as per U.G.C. scale (revised pay scale) from July 1982 to July 2005 along with admissible statutory interest. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has also filed representation before the authority concerned. However, no decision has been taken. It was submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to file a fresh representation. In view of the stand by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the court is of the opinion that writ petition can be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2/Vice Chancellor, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, it is expected 3 that respondent no.2 will examine the same and pass appropriate order within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. So far as prayer for merger of 50% Dearness relief on his basic pension is concerned, the writ petition stands allowed in terms of order dated 3.12.2010 passed in C.W.J.C.3616 of 2010 (Dr. Himanshu Bhushan Vs. Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University and others) and other connected writ petitions. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)