PETITEONERS/ Munm La! Kesar'ichané Jain, Firm, Gudiyari, i‘ .L ‘ u II‘I‘\ Kawur' yaw}. 2. Kesnr-i Chand Lodha (Jain‘). 5/0 Sahara Raj Lad a, aged abom‘ 5O year's, Through Firm Mu m La! Kesar'i Chand; 2/0 6udiycr'iV Raipur Lodha {Jami W/c Kesari €hand Lodha w I?a n), _\. agéd (mam 4 ac na year’s, fnmijgru l i manna A: yLa: l Kes r-i Chand, Gudiyari: Raipur- $6}. 5a uosh Lodha {Jain}. 5/0 Sohan Raj Ladha, age anauT . . #0 . years, fnr-ougn ‘ I F rir‘m munna IA La! S 1 Kes ri Chand, R/o’ Gudiyari, Raipur (CG). Ch £a Sci Lodha (Jain), W/o Samosh Lodha; égé abéu?‘ 32 years, i*'r:'r‘augh Prirm murma A: 'La! l Kes r'i Chand, R/c 6udiyari, Raipur (C6). ra Bai Shri Shriman, W/o Navinchand 5h i Shriman, ugeé aban'i' 50 year‘s, +h‘r‘oug'r1 Munna La! Kesari Chand‘ Q/c Gud§yariA 7. gas n? 3ai Chapda, W/o Amri‘!‘ Lei Chopda, clge “ wow? 43 yém‘s, i’hmugh Firm H‘uvmd La? Kes r5 C‘hand; We Ka’rora ‘i‘cdab, Raipur {€61 8. Ma. Ta Parakh, W/a Surendm Parakh, aged {3%w ’i' 45 yéar‘3, i‘hr‘éug’n Firm Manna Lai Kesari 6?: d, Q/o 6udiyari, kaignur {CG}. n ’ d WW,W,W WI. m ‘.. 1F: 200 mm (W) mmm wmm WW§WW %a’i%mm%st mmm 9. Man‘u Gadia, W/o Anil Gadia; aged abou? 40 yaars, *hrough Fi... Mama Lai Késar‘i Charm}, We 1.5. Shukia iload‘, RaEpur (CG). —Versus- RESPONDENTS 1. Nemichand Bhans,ali, S/o Lafe Amoiak Chand Bhm‘sdi, agaa‘ abouf 60 yemis, Occupcd‘iw Money iender, R/o Edward Road: Raipué- (CG). Pla3n1‘iff 2. Siddaarfh Lodha; 5/0 Kesar-i Chand Ladha, aged abouf 2§ year's, l‘ K/o l wuaiyari, I‘ ‘ Rai’pur' (ya). FF\ m Lodha, 5/0 Kesari Chand Lodha: aged 1’9 yeur$, Q/o Guu'iyar'i, iQaipur' (C6). (WritPe‘rifion Lmder- Arfic e 227 of #xe Consfifu'rion of India) in €e Bench : Hon Shri Justice L.C. Bhw 29-1-2008 On a men‘rion bamg made, he case is ‘mken up. Shri Vimiash 8ajpai,‘ couns i for “the paiTiamm. Vida arder dafed 2G-11-2 0'7 H was tiared'ed To issue no‘rice 1'0 The respoadem‘s. As per fhe office r par-11. *I'he n¢1'ices have been served upon ‘rhe respmden‘fs; bu? none aypears in he ma‘H'er. Hecr‘d Qeamed counsei for he yeTi’doners. ‘By fms wrif ye%i1’ion und r Arficle 227 of fhe Cons‘rifufion of India, #he peti‘rioners have questioned iegaliw & correctness of The order dafed a S ' k ao WW,WW,W mww 394T mmm ?a_3g-9nn7 mgcad h, we gfh r "I Raipur" in Civil SuiT No.10-E peTiTioners No.1; 3; 4 & 7 To 1C wwwiwm $aimamé¥t 4dd§?§enai Distriaf Judge, Fast ?rack Caurt /2007,, whereby The applicafion fi§ed by ) for sz‘mng aside The ex parfe order dated 24—10-2007 has been rejected. e pe'ri‘rioners argued ‘F‘haf cn accoum of -2007._ The wprk of 22-40-2007 was spread e pe’mioners was busy in oTher Cour“? and he was n9? abie tn appear before #he Ceur? of 9’“ Addl. Dis?rict Judge on 24-10-2967. He submi‘r‘red thm on ‘rhaf day fhe case was fixed for evidence of rhe pioin‘riff and fhe defen 31mm nfs. Sidarfh Jain was presen‘l' on behalf of defendants No,11 & 12. Even fh piaim’iff soughf fime for adducing evideace. Ie The given sifuafion,‘ the expa fe order ough‘r To have been se1' aside; Having heard iearned ceu sel for The pefi‘l’ioners; I have perused The record. E? is admi??ed posi‘fio that 22—10~2007 was deem-ed as holiday: Therefore; if is hafurai *thm Th work of 22—10-2007 was 1's be adjusted to 23m & 24"“ Om‘ober, 200,7. As per The order shee‘!‘ dad‘ed 24-1‘3-299? The maTTer was fixed for evidenc of The plain‘riff and fhe defefideh‘rs. On 24-10-2OG7 fhe plain‘dff sough Time for adducing evidence, fhereforez fhe mefrer was adjourned 1’0 25-10 2007 for evidence of The piainTiff. In The giver: siTuaTiorii on 24-10-200 no effecTive hearing Took piace and no wimeeses of any parTy were e amined. Before recording evidence of The piainTiff, iT was noT possibie To ecord evidence of The defendanTs‘ IT has in 200 3mm (WW) Learned counsei for Ti deciaraTion of hoiiday on 22—1C over. Therefore; counsei for Ti been memioned Thaf ceunsel f( In fhe giver: sifuaWmi in muHipiicifies of The proceedinc fhe exparfe order passed agai: In View of #he above; 1+ appears “to be perverse and sun pefi‘rion is alicwed and “:he z Addifionul Dis‘l’ricf Judgef F: 10-3/2007 rejec‘ring fhe agapii )r the plaantiff was busy in some wher‘ Cour-1'. order To avoid further compiica‘Hons and s, learned ‘h‘ial Cour‘l’ ought f0 have seT aside sf The pefifioners herein. e order yassed by *he #riai Cour‘r ,ar’ima fade ge is imbie 1'0 seT aside. Aceardingiyi fhe writ arder dared 25-10-2GQ7 passed by The 9’1“ Is? Track Court Raipur; in Civii Suif No. a‘fion of The pe‘fi‘l'ioners herein for se‘Hing aside fhe exparre order is qu hed‘ Learned friai Court is direcfed 1'0 ailow the gardeners +0 par-I’icipote i fhe proceedings and To proceed wiTh ihe Trio! of rhe sui? offer giving opporf nify 1'0 The defendams ‘io cross-examine ihe piuimiff if i? needs and iherea er They be ailowed fo adduce ?heir evidence. Of course; ‘i‘he pe‘ii‘rioners her and groduce evidence as per t The friol Court wiii be en'i‘ii'iedj (foosequenfiy; I.A.No.1 s? Ceriified copy ioday. in shaii poriicipafe ii? day-io—day groceedings 1e directions of ‘ihe 'i'riai Court faiiing which o pass orders in accordance wifh idw. ands disposed of. Sd/— L.C. Bhadoo Judge W m 'FFL 200‘ Wm (W) mmfaaia; wmm mmm WWW ’.1E‘E°IW éwfmm