CWP No.23434 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION: 24.12.2010 1.CWP No.23434 of 2010 Suraj Bhan ...Petitioner VERSUS HUDA and another …Respondents 1.CWP No.23468 of 2010 Chand Ram ...Petitioner VERSUS HUDA and another …Respondents CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI PRESENT: Mr.Rajesh Malik, Advocate for the petitioner Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr. J.P. Bhatt, Advocate who is present in Court has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this order will dispose of both the writ petitions at motion stage since common questions of law and facts are involved. The petitioners were owner in possession of their respective lands CWP No.23434 of 2010 2 having half share which were acquired for development of Sector 52, Gurgaon. The respondents have issued various policies for allotment of plots, residential/commercial to the land owners whose land is acquired for development purpose. The petitioners claim allotment of plots under the Oustee Schemes formulated by the respondents from time to time. The petitioners submitted their respective applications (Annexure P-4 in both the writ petitions), but no decision has been taken thereon. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if respondents are directed to take decision on their applications. In view of the above, both the writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the applications of the petitioners within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon the competent authority. Needless to say in the event the claim of the petitioners is to be rejected, it shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. Copy of this order be placed on record of each concerned file. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 24.12. 2010 MFK CWP No.10585 of 2010 3