IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.666 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Narendra Kumar S/o Rampal R/o Village Chandpur, P.S. Badgaon, District Saharanpur ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: September 1, 2010 __________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.227 of 2009 Under Sections 302, 307, 120B, 34 and 212 of IPC, P.S. Ranipur, District Haridwar ________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is not named in the FIR and he is not cited as a conspirator. He further submitted that no evidence has been collected by the I.O. to connect him with the said crime. Learned Addl. GA for the State submitted that the present applicant has criminal history of one case. In this regard, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been released on bail in that case. He further submitted that all the co-accused of the present case has been granted bail by this Court and the present applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Narendra Kumar be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 1.9.2010 RG