Bam .C^7 y' <3~Q IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. ^^^? / 2006 PETITIONERS ^y/ 4g?7 V'V-N^ »' ^y ^ ^-T^-^o¥^ ^F^/^c^ 7" ^^ ^/^s?c% - ft. ^ ^iss ff^y' ...•^":-s^ ffs-y ...^f.cy.i1' v'"v\ %«S11ir 1. Ghanshyam Singh Raj, S/o. Shri/^ Anand Ram Sidar, aged about - 37years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Ragjapara, Block - Sakti, Distt. - Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 2. Bajrang Singh Raj, S/o. Shri Ful/ Singh Raj, aged about 38 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Boirdih, Block - Sakti, Distt. - Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3. Smt. Dhatree Paikra, W/o. Shri/ Indra Pal Singh Paikra, aged about 33 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Ragja, Block-Sakti, Distt.- Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 4. Indra Pal Singh Paikra, S/o. Shri/ Main Singh Paikra, aged About 31 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. MiddleSchool, Ragja, Block - Sakti Distt.- Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 5. Dadu Lal Sidar, S/o. Shri Beni Ram, Sidar, aged about 37 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Arjuni, Block- Sakti, Distt.- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ,-afei^it*iiiainEB=^E;E-~ •s-'^ ^ Sukhi Lal Kanwar, S/o. Shri Chanduwa Ram Kanwar, aged about 37 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Aamapali, Block- Sakti, Distt. - Janjgir Champa (C.G.) I/ Ajay Kumar Kurrey, S/o. Shri Megh Singh Kurrey, aged about 37 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School - Parsahi, Bolck - Akaltara, Distt. - Janjgir Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 3. State of Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary Department of Education D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Director, Public Instruction Ghhattisgarh Govt. Raipur District Education Officer, Distt.-Janjgir Champa (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block - Sakti, Distt.- Janjgir Champa (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block - Akaltara, Distt.- Janjgir Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/aTrt. OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT. WRITS. DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IJJTHEMArTER, ^•- r~^^' XI-HC-22 sn^rw fepiraan^r ShH flfetT ;a<- v^ :Jy \ 3^^rara:T, ®T(lwis,l°i<'iwy _.^f&>.^(£?{ HTWn Sh*<|th 200^, Rre% sn^rg^tiwgfitr Dy$A 24.11.2006 Shri A.S. Rajput, couns^ Shri Satish fiupta, Heard. It is not disputed by Administrative Tribunal in reached its finality. Having considered both the parties and wi'thou't) the case, it is directed representation along with Authority within a period of shall decide that representat! of 30 doys from the dat^ considering all the points rais^ the order passed by tiie No.1452/1998. With the aforesaid Ihe dA +i*itd'in.< tniRffirte^ <.fSit<i<. ^?si)^T3n^?r 1 for the petitioners. for the State/reqiondents. State that the order pussed by the No.1452/1998 dated 31.01.20)0 has ar^uments advanced by teamed counset for expressing any opinion on -the merit of •fhat petitioners may submit detailed c((py of this petition to the Competent ^ne month from today; and who, in turn Vpn in cn objective nuinner within a period of receipt of representation after is^d by the petitioners ond the impact of 'ribunal dated 31.01.2000 m the OA direjction, the petition stmds disposed of. Sdi- V.K. Shrivastava Judge (^y^) 'v