IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2160 of 2007 SANDEEP KUMAR Versus THE BIHAR INTERMEDIATE EDU.COU ----------- 2. 05/08/2008 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that being unsatisfied with his result of Intermediate Science examination held in the month of March, 2006, petitioner applied for re- evaluation of the marks of papers of Physics-II, Chemistry-II, Math-I & II and English-II. Learned counsel for the Council submits that since there was no provision of re- evaluation under the Rules, the Council only held scrutiny of the answer papers of the petitioner and except for Math-I paper no flaw was found in the award of marks in other papers. So far as paper of Chemistry-II is concerned, marks of the petitioner obtained could not be scrutinized as the answer paper of Chemistry-II of the petitioner was found misplaced. In Math-I paper it was found that he was wrongly allotted 55 marks whereas actually he had secured 71 marks. Taking advantage of the fact that the answer paper of the petitioner of Chemistry-II - 2 - is misplaced, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be allotted average marks in Chemistry-II paper. Since due to own mistake of the Council, Chemistry-II paper of the petitioner could not be scrutinized, it is directed that the petitioner may be allotted average marks in Chemistry-II paper and result of the petitioner may be revised accordingly. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ application stands disposed of. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)