IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10076 of 2011 Poonam Devi W/o Arvind Das, R/o village & PO- Baikhatpur P.S- Khusrupur Distt- Patna---------------------------------------Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Patna 3. The District Programme Officer, Patna 4. C.D.P.O., Khusrupur 5. the B.D.O., Khusrupur, Patna 6. Prakhand Panchayat Raj Padadhikari/Panchayat Sewak Baikatpur Khusrupur, Patna 7. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Baikatpur, Patna-------Respondents ---------------------------------- 2 8.9.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Annexures 4 and 4/A are only communications at the level of the District Magistrate to enquire into the matter with regard to engagement or appointment of the petitioner against which complaints have been made right upto Chief Minister. Mere direction of an enquiry to find out the actual state of affairs does not give cause of action to the petitioner to prevent the authority for carrying out such an exercise. In the opinion of this Court this writ application is premature at this stage. It is made clear that there may be an occasion for her to approach this Court if something against her interest is recorded by the respondents on the basis of the enquiry report. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)