gst 1 wp6397-96.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO. 6397 OF 2010 AND WRIT PETITION NO. 6396 OF 2010 Sharif Hasan Abdul Rauf Anwar Ul Haque Hasan Raja ... .... .... Petitioners. V/s Mun. Corpn. Of Gr. Mumbai & Anr. .... .... Respondents. Mr.M.V.Holmagi, Adv. For the petitioners. Ms.Savina Bangera, Adv. For respondent No.2. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 19th April, 2011 PC: The petitioner challenges the order dated 17.7.2010 in Suit No.5473/04. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 states that the suit is already decreed on 26.8.2010. Copy of the said decree is placed on record. Mr.Holmagi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the decree which is passed has been passed without following due process of law and without giving an opportunity to the petitioner and also behind the back of the petitioner. 2. If the decree is passed behind the back of the petitioner the petitioner can very well file an application for setting aside the same. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the decree on merits he can very well challenge the said decree by filing an appeal and taking the grounds which he seeks to raise by the present petition. 3. In that view of the matter I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition in extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Writ petition stands dismissed. 4. In view of disposal of writ petitions civil application Nos.386 and 388 of 2011 do not survive and the same also stand disposed of.