1 W.P.No.2479.95 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2479 OF 1995 The Executive Engineer, Mechanical Division, Tillarinagar, Tal. Chandgad, Dist. Kolhapur. ... Petitioner v/s Maharashtra Rajya Veej Pat Bandhare Kamgar Sangh, Pune. ... Respondent Mr.A.D.Kango, A.G.P. for the petitioner. Mr,.K.S.Bapat, amicus curiae for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 30TH AUGUST, 2010 P.C.: 1. The complaint was filed by the respondents under Items 5, 6, 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of the M.R.T.U. & P.U.L.P. Act, 1971. The Industrial Court had directed the petitioners to confer permanency on the concerned workmen from the dates they completed 240 days in service and to further grant them consequential benefits. 2 W.P.No.2479.95 2. According to the learned A.G.P. the claim of the respondent union in the complaint filed by them has been granted by the petitioners. An affidavit has been filed by Sachin B. Pardeshi, Deputy Executive Engineer, Office of the Executive Engineer, Mechanical Division, Tilarinagar, H.Q., Kolhapur, in which he has stated as under:- “I further state that in the light of the above circumstances, all employees of the respondent Union have been made permanent in furtherance of the terms and conditions of Kalelkar Award. At the same time, the names of the persons mentioned in the said letter at Sr.Nos.5 and 8 even though they are working with the division of the petitioner department, they are not interested in going further with the present litigation. The same time the reliefs which they have claimed in the original application on page 31 of the compilation of the writ petition, most respectively as per prayer clause (b), that they have received the permanency.” 3. In view of the aforesaid statement contained in the affidavit, the petition has become infructuous and therefore stands dismissed as such. ..... 3 W.P.No.2479.95