1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.518/2008 Ashok Gulabrao Shelke ...Versus... The Chief Executive Officer, Z.P., Amravati and another -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri P.S. Patil, Adv. for petitioner] [Shri S.R. Chaudhari, Ms S. Chaudhari Advs. for respdts.] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 28.07.2008 Heard learned Counsel for the rival parties. An interlocutory order made by the Industrial Court, refusing to continue interim relief pending decision of the complaint is under challenge in the present writ petition. It appears that the State Government issued directions to the respondents to make adjustment in the department, since there was no grant available for salary and dearness allowances. In this type of typical situation, the respondents had no alternative but to shift the petitioner from one place to another. 2 Learned Counsel for the respondents states that the place where the petitioner has now been posted is at 25 kilometers. I do not find any fault if the petitioner attends the duties at 25 km., because of the genuine difficulty of the respondents. Hence, the petitioner should be allowed to join the duties at the place of posting. If the petitioner desires, he can join immediately. The issue whether the petitioner is entitled to salary for the period he did not work will be decided by the Industrial Court on its own merits in the pending complaint. The Writ Petition is dismissed. The petitioner is, however, at liberty to raise all the issues in the complaint pending before the Industrial Court. No order as to costs. JUDGE ssw