3mm) BgnEh‘ CD Q/ N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. S No. éOéL [2006 PETITIONER’S Smt. Kamla Bek, W/o. Shri Leda / Bek, aged about — 39 years, Assistant Teacher Govt. Girls Primary SchooL Pakhnakot, Block — Dharmjaygarh Distt. — Raigarh (C.G.) ii Smt. Padma Bai Patel (now/ ji. Dongare) W/o. Shri Shyam Dongare, aged about 35 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary Schooi Ghui-Chuwa, Block-Pali, Distt. —Korba (C.G.) VERSUS ’ 1. State of Chhattisgrh, Through/— The Secretary Department of Tribal Welfare D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner Tribal Welfare / Department , Chhattisgarh Government Raipur Tribal / Welfare, District- Raigarh (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal / Welfare, District— Korba (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF > THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA for ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT, WRITS, DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. I RESPONDENTS @ $IN$LE §$N¢H § HOMI LEMR; 5ATI$H K- AGN'WTEhJw wRrr PETITIoN {swwasm .eF zansum smt. KamiaBokmdamther . versus Respondens: Stats-of chmmhaand’otharsw WNT PM‘TW {$4 “awn 9F 3m Petitiw'ler Dhyanu Singh Kanwap VBY$H% Sme ofvChhwsgam and others: Prasent‘ >: Mr. Anil singhsRajpm, counse! .far: mapetitioners i‘n bath the petitions; for Mr. Ajay Dwivedi. Panel Lawyer f'orma‘wspandamsiasrate" in w.P.(s.) Maison/2006. Ms. Deepali Panday, Panel Lawyar- {espondanwwexin' W.P.(S.) No.6062/2006; ' u1e ORDER (Passed on 7m afNdvemher, 2006) ‘ By this petition undatNticissQzS/zzTof meCanstimtim of lndiai ma petitionavs seeka‘ direction to the respondons iooay he; increments and senioriw «on the basis of the dag of thoir initiat: ‘ //@ appointment- in the light oftheldedsion rendared by‘the Inmad Staten Administrative. Tribunal; Jabalpur in Origina! AppManN¢145z of“ 1998 (Harish Chand Singh. and othersvvs; Stehof 'M.P. and OM) dated 31-1 -2000. Original Application No.802 of 19%‘(Amm and others vs. 3mg a! MadwaaPmdeshcand others) md Otiginal Application No.991 of 1998(Ramayen PrasadWWW vs. Staie of M.P. and others). 2. Learned counsel rappearingrfot morrpetiticnetswptacad'on record a copy of the 0tder datedr12—10-2008zpassed:by‘vthisrCourt in _ Writ Petitian (5.) No.5593 of 2006 (Smt Ashe Ekkav:(nowekaushik} and ‘ another vs. sate of 'Chhath'sgarh ardoihers) and submits hat thy , petitioners are-similarly situated, therafore,‘ the similar ordor‘may be passed. 3. The present writ. petitiens; being; Writ Petiians‘ ($3. Ne.6062 of 2006 and 6078 of 2006 invoive‘similar fem endacommon: question of Iaw. Thus. mess,petitioneare-‘beingdispoeed ofbythrs ~ common order. 4. Thevcases of theoe§tioners~ are that they were appeinted-u; as Teacher in the School Education ‘Depamnent on orobetlon for av period, of two years with the. hxedhsalaryi. However; later on, after completion of twosyears' probation. the. petitioners .werevreguierizod, but, they were not given the regular pay-scale Outer similarly situated: teachers movedstheStete Mministm Tribunairdabalpurrbr regular w pay-scale, wherein rleamedaTribunel. vlde order‘datedv 31-1-2000, allowed the same. The petitioners made several representationsato» X accord me same treatment as: they V étasaksa: simihrw;sm¢t¢aam;‘ - 5. Learnad wunsel‘ ion than Wows ksubmha m an r, pah‘kioners may be-_a%lawedrto. maksa an, Iraptesmtatim w 1mm. Na;1' kc give-simihrgmmm,m:melpo§imandism:samavpay-sam~ J whichrhas» been, “waned ha» other. similmymsmsad»: Mew 0m :r account: of me. ordw of the W AdministWee‘vEribtmal. datedwm4- 200a, to which; learnedi counsels’far tha respondanwsmawhassnn: =: objection. 6. regatdntortherfaea‘ and eimtmmgasni’mGmdname aplniun aim Com;._the. iimimdz prayernmadewby ‘Iaamad‘,munselefan wouwhnem‘ i appears: to be: reaaonabia‘.“ Thezefore;,_mv pawonom an anewedm: _ make, ayrepresenhh‘an within a, petiodxofatwarwaelsfrom my to » respondentNoA; raising: anathairsgyiavames and, in. tum; respundmtétv I m1 shandecmmajsamimmesam mambbativmmnorwmm a period of‘wrdays fmm thew data of receiptvofsunhrreprmntaiiom amt . a. ~ considering; an the: poinsc raised by the Warsaw whine; intm: Having heard: leamed‘ .coaasulfermaparaesandhaung ’ a Adminisuative Tribunal: in OligimisAppIicaiion: Na;14§2,ef~ 1898.- anéifv z the peiitiensrs stand on ‘m:»samehfoah‘nas. asntmmpetiiienamsin me: ' Otiginal-Appli ion. M1452 of: 1998;”Ien'they'haalsa‘saach'madJM5: same.-pay~scaie and samamy - - The wnt pwiuans ate» accerdingly dispased of wmma 7. aforssaidtdireetion. Naorderasncosa; «KQD A copy of this otderbo plaosd on' the record of the connectwwxit'petitian.» , 5 1 Sd/- Judge I $ Satish K.Agnihotri ‘ ‘ Gopal ¥ L