IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 839 (M/S) OF 2006 Ganga Parashad S/o Sri Rehtu Lal Sharma R/o village Kharanja-Kutubpur, P.O.-Kaksar, District Haridwar (Uttaranchal). ..Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary Higher Education, Dehradun. 2. Vice Chancellor, H.N.B.G.U. Sri Nagar Garhwal 3. Registrar, H.N.B.G.U. Sri Nagar Garhwal. .......Respondent Dated 5.7.2006 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Sri Sanjeev Singh & Atul Bahuguna, Advocates for the petitioner and Standing Counsel for the State. Both the parties have agreed that let the matter be finally disposed of at the admission stage. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to provide 15 additional marks of teacher wards to the petitioner and also direct the respondents to consider the petitioner for B.Ed. Session 2006. Briefly stated, the petitioner has passed his graduation in the year, 2000 and thereafter in the year 2002, he appeared in the post graduation examination with English from Chaudhary Charan Singh University. In the year, 2005, he appeared for the B.Ed. Entrance Examination, 2005 of Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna University, Sri Nagar-Garhwal. Thereafter, the University has published a list of candidates, who were eligible for the next counseling on 16.06.2006 in the B.Ed. Management Quota and the last group which was selected according to the merit, the qualifying marks is to the extent of 226, when in point of fact, the petitioner has secured only 213 marks. The petitioner has requested for 15 additional marks in order to qualify in the merit list and approached the authority concerned in pursuance of the Item No. 12 of B.Ed. Admission Form, 2005. The same is quoted below. fu;ekad fu;ekad dk fooj.k ftlds vad pkgrs gSA izek.k&i= nsus okyk vf/kdkjh vfrfjDr izek.k&Ik= 1-ekU;rk izkIr ek0fo0 ds 2-f’k{k.ksRrj deZpkjh dk okMZ ftyk f’k{kk vf/kdkjh 15 Vadsk dk ;ksx 15 Liberty is given to the petitioner to approach the authority by making a representation with in period of one week. In case the representation is filed, the respondent no.2, is directed to dispose of the representation and consider the case of the petitioner within 15 days from the date of production of the certified copy of the order. Writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) 5.7.2006