IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH R.S.A. No. 5839 of 2003 Date of decision Februrary 6, 2007 Mukhtiar Singh .......Appellant Versus Piara Singh and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL Present:- Sh. H. S. Kamboj, Advocate for the appellant. Sh. L. S. Sidhu, Advocate for the respondents. **** Viney Mittal, J (Oral) The defendant No.14-Mukhtiar Singh is appellant before this Court. He has lost concurrently before the two Courts below. A suit for joint possession of the land in question was filed by the plaintiffs. It was claimed that originally, the land in question was owned by Ranga Singh son of Surain Singh and the plaintiffs are three daughters and defendants No.1 to 4 are his four sons. According to the plaintiff, defendants No.1 to 4 had got the mutation of inheritance of Ranga Singh in their favour, illegally and wrongly, and defendants No.5 to 14 claim themselves to be co-sharers and transferees of the suit land. On that basis the plaintiffs claimed a decree for joint possession. Both the Courts below have up held the relationship of the plaintiffs with deceased-Ranga Singh and consequently, up held their claim for joint possession, as per their own entitlement. Nothing has been shown that the findings of fact recorded by the two Courts below suffer from any infirmity or are contrary R.S.A. No. 5839 of 2003 -2- to the record. No question of law, much less any substantial question of law, arises in the present appeal. Dismissed. (VINEY MITTAL) JUDGE February 6, 2007 archana