IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2010 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 23420 of 2010(Q) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- THOMAS MATHEW, S/O.MATHEW, AGED 39 YEARS, MELATHUCOCHIYIL HOUSE, IRIMPANAM, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.SABU THOZHUPPADAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOCHI CITY POLICE, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM. 3. RAJ. P. @ KUMAR RAJ, BINDHU NIVAS, THOTTAKKATTUKARA P.O., ALUVA-8, ERNAKULAM. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.I.V. PRAMOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs M.Sasidharan Nambiar, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C)No.23420 of 2010 Q -------------------------- JUDGMENT This petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for a direction to the first respondent to entrust investigation of the complaint filed by the third respondent against petitioner seeking police protection and directing first respondent to initiate appropriate proceedings in Exhibit P5 petition submitted before City Police Commissioner seeking investigation on the complaint filed by the third respondent. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner was heard. 3. Complaining police harassment, petitioner approached this Court by filing W.P.(C)No. 22258/2010. By Exhibit P4 judgment, recording the submission of the learned Government Pleader that police are only enquiring into the complaint, the writ petition was disposed. It is thereafter this WPC 23420/10 2 petition is filed. I find no reason to direct an investigation of the complaint filed against the petitioner by the third respondent at the instance of the petitioner, when, admittedly, no crime has so far been registered. In such circumstances, petition is dismissed. 2nd December, 2010 (M.Sasidharan Nambiar, Judge) tkv