IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P. NO :5622 of 2009 Between: Santosh Kumar Sadh ..... PETITIONER AND Smt. Fareh Zeba Khan .....RESPONDENT The Court made the following : HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:5622 OF 2009 ORDER: Aggrieved by the judgment dated 9.9.2009 passed in R.A.No.224 of 2007 by the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad confirming the order of the learned Principal Rent Controller, Hyderabad in R.C.No:295 of 2005, dated 31.08.2007, the present civil revision petition has been preferred. The revision petitioner is the tenant and the respondent is the landlord. Originally, the landlord filed the above RC seeking eviction of the tenant from the petition schedule premises. The Court below allowed the above RC directing the tenant to vacate the schedule premises and hand over vacant possession of the schedule premises within two months. Hence, the tenant carried the matter in appeal and the appellate Court dismissed the appeal by confirming the order of the Rent Controller. Having aggrieved by the same, the present revision petition is filed by the tenant. When this matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner-tenant submitted that the petitioner-tenant files an affidavit undertaking to vacate the schedule premises within six months. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner-tenant, I feel it appropriate to grant six months time to the petitioner-tenant to vacate the schedule premises. Accordingly, six months time is granted to the petitioner-tenant to vacate the schedule premises subject to the condition that he shall file an affidavit in the registry by tomorrow. The affidavit that would be filed by the petitioner-tenant shall form part of the record. Subject to the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari Date:10.12.2009 Nn. HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:5622 OF 2009 10.12.2009