-^. Amit /^~^ &n HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPEnTIQNNo,2713of20QJ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Deen Bandhu Saheb Gumgoswami/ aged about 70 years, son of Late Asthir Saheb Gumgoswami- resident of Hatkeshwar Bag, District Dhamtari (Cliliattisgarh) VER8US 1. State of Clihattisgarh, through Secretar}7, Department of Revenue (Land Revenue) Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector, Distt. Dhanitari (CG) 3. Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Coimcil, Dhamtari. WKTI PETmON LWDER ARnCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTH'UTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Slni Satish K. Agmliotri, J. Present: Shri Pawan Kesharwam, Advocate appeamig on behalf of Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri Alok Bakshi, Govenmient Advocate for the State/respondeiit No. 1 and 2. QRALORDER (Passed on 18 day of October, 2008) 1. By tliis petition, the petitioner impugns tlie ietter dated 15 February, 2005 (A?inexi?re P/l) written by the Chief Mumcipal Officer, Dhamtari, to fhe Tehsildar, Dhamtari whereby the Tehsitdar has been dii'ected to produce the records before the Collector, Dhamtari, with regard to constmction in respect of shops constnicted by the Municipal Council- Dhamtari. The petitioner is aggrisved by this coiimiusiication and impugiis the acquisition ofhis propeily. 2. On pemsal ofthe conimumcation, it appears fhat no effective order has been passed either to acquire a particular land or to make allotment to any other person. There is no merit m this case. The petition is frivolous and thus, is accordmgly dismissed in limine. No order asto costs. 3. Consequently, M(W)P No. 2249/2005, for interim reliet: also stands dismissed. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge