IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. L.P.A. No.1410 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision: 16.12.2009 Haryana Urban Development Authority & others. -----Appellants Vs. Dhani Ram Saini & others. -----Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present:- Mr. Manish, Advocate for the appellants. --- ORDER: It is not disputed that LPA No.1070 of 2009 Haryana Urban Development Authority & others v. Harsh Kinra & others, arising out of the common order in connected writ petitions, has been dismissed on 10.12.2009. Only point of distinction made in the present case is that the land acquired was less than 75% of the total land holding, in which case entitlement to allotment to plot does not arise under the policy. Learned Single Judge rejected this submission by holding that neither this was a ground mentioned in the order passed, rejecting the claim of the writ petitioner, nor it could be LPA No.1410 of 2009 disputed that as far as the writ petitioner is concerned, his 99% land has been acquired. Thus, even if acquired land was less than 75% of the total area, in absence of any other co-sharer having been allotted plot, there is no ground to interfere with the direction for allotment of one plot to the writ petitioner. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE December 16, 2009 ( GURDEV SINGH ) ashwani JUDGE 2