[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1195 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1195 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1195 OF 2007 Smt. Rohmeet @ Dimple Gurjet Dhingra ..Applicant V/s Shri Gurjeet Singh Dhingra ˆ Anr. ..Respondents. Mr.Yogesh R. Israni, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Rajendra Bidkar, Advocate for respodnent NO.1. Mrs. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the State. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 23RD APRIL, 2007. DATE : 23RD APRIL, 2007. DATE : 23RD APRIL, 2007. P.C. . Heard Mr. Yogesh Israni, learned Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Bidkar, learned Counsel for respondent No.1 and Mrs.Mhatre, learned APP for the State. Perused the record. 2. The applicant and respondent No.1 were married in the year 1979. However, some disputes occurred between the two and the respondent, who is the husband, filed FIR No.140/98 at Malbar Hill Police Station. The offence under section 454,380, 201 of IPC came to be registered against the wife, who is the present applicant. Even before that the Marriage Petition [2] No.A-1505/1997 was filed by the present applicant before the Family Court. On 10/5/2000, The consent terms were filed by the parties before the Family Court, whereby they agreed to take divorce by mutual consent. According to the applicant, after divorce, the applicant and respondent No.1 have reconciled and they have remarried again and are living together now. Therefore, she seeks that the proceeding arising out of Crime No.140/98 be quashed. The learned Counsel for respondent No.1 has no objection and he concedes for the same. In view of the peculiar facts of this case, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.)