:1: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.529 OF 2008 M/s. Frooti Beverages. ..Applicant. Vs. K.N. Govindan and anr. ..Respondents. Mr. Aruna Singh for the Applicant. Mr. Rajesh More, APP. for the State. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 8th August, 2008 PC : 1. Heard Advocate for the applicant. 2. Perused the affidavit of service. None appears for the other side though served. In my view, application involves arguable points. The question as to whether notice can be said to be bad merely because the name of the Proprietor has not been specifically mentioned requires reconsideration. The point as to whether evidence can be accepted in absence of the verification also needs consideration. Hence, leave granted. Consequently the appeal to be numbered. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 1. Heard Advocate for the Appellant. 2. Admit. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)