IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.378 of 2008 BUNDELA RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 6.2.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. In the instant writ application the petitioner prays for directing the respondents to properly investigate the case of Bakhtiarpur P.S. case No.50 of 2008 instituted by the petitioner on 3.3.2008 under sections 147,148,149 and 302/201 and I.P.C. and section 27 of the Arms Act. In the aforesaid case the petitioner has named about 12 persons as accused. There is also a counter case being Bakhtiarpur P.S. Case No.51/08 dated 3.3.2008 under sections 147,148,149, 302 and 379 of I.P.C. in which some other including the petitioner are accused. The learned counsel submits that the allegations in other case seems pulpably false in view of inherent contradiction in prosecution itself. The learned counsel for the State submits that the accusation has been found true against three persons and the investigation against the rest accused persons is continuing. If the petitioner files a detailed representation bringing on record the involvement of the other accused persons and the infirmities in Bakhtiarpur P.S. Case No.50/08, the same would be examined with due care in course of investigation. With the aforesaid direction this writ application is 2 disposed of. . Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)