1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6125/2010. (Smt. Asarsbai w/o Bhaskar Gore Vs. The Sub Divisional Forest Officer, Beed and Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.AN Nagargoje, Adv. for petitioner; Mr.KS Patil, AGP for Resp.Nos. 1 to 5. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 7 th October, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) Learned Counsel for petitioner has placed before me a copy of order dated 29th July, 2010, passed in a bunch of litigations commencing from WP No.3077 of 2007. In paragraph 3 of the said order, the Division Bench has remitted and the allowed the petitioners to avail the remedy available to them under law. The appellate authority is directed to decide the appeals, if filed by the petitioners against the impugned orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. The Division Bench also directed, no coercive action be taken against the petitioners pursuant to non- renewal of their licenses. 3) Both the learned Counsel accept to act 2 in tune with the directions of the learned Division Bench, referred in para no.3 above. 4) Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed. The petitioner is at liberty to approach the Appellate Authority and till the Appellate Authority decides the claims of the petitioner, no coersive action be taken against the petitioner, as is indicated in para 3 of the said order. 5) The concerned authority shall consider the point of limitation on its own merits. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/