CRR No.1487 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.R. No.1487 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 07.01.2011 Jagir Singh …Petitioner Versus Ishar Singh …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI -.- Present: Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner. *** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. This revision petition has been filed against the judgment and order dated 16.01.2010 passed by learned Appellate Court whereby the respondent No.1 has been acquitted. Learned Counsel has vehemently argued that the learned Judicial Magistrate had rightly convicted the respondent also and no cogent reasons have been given by the learned Appellate Court for differing with the view taken by the learned trial Court. The learned Appellate Court has passed its decision on CRR No.1487 of 2010 (O&M) -2- the fact that the respondent was 80 years old and he is father of the complainant and learned Appellate Court has also noticed that no act except lalkara was attributed to the said respondent. In my opinion, there is no sufficient basis to determine the culpability of the said respondent for the offence alleged against him and learned Appellate Court has rightly passed the judgment and order dated 16.01.2010. Consequently, this revision petition is dismissed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) January 07, 2011 JUDGE ashish