IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34995 of 2008 MD.NAUSAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner, who is the husband, apprehends arrest in a complaint case under Sections 498A, 323 of the Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The submission is that the petitioner has filed a suit for restitution of conjugal rights. The reconciliation before the court below failed when the complainant refused to go to the matrimonial home. The allegations are of the petitioner assaulted the complainant with iron rod. This Court, therefore, finds it difficult to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail on the submission made. The application is rejected. In any application for regular bail, the court below shall appropriately keep in mind his willingness for revival of matrimonial harmony and dispose off the application of regular bail in the light of the guidelines laid down by this Court in 498 A matters without being prejudiced by the present order. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)