mmmma WM1§WW *Wm w .6856 zoo Distn: ‘t Raigarh (CG) (Petition U/ A 226 f Constitution of India) 08.12.2008 i Shri Sanjay Patel, counsel or the petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel L er for the State. Heard. By the present petition the petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to pay in rements and seniority nom the date of his initial appointment in the ' ht of decision rendered by the M.P. State Administrative Tribunal ' O.A. No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. d others) dated 24.8.1992 and also this Court in WP; (s} No.5976/0 , dated 7.11.2006. Case of the petitioner is at he was appointed on 3. 12.1984 as Assistant Teacher on probation or a period of two years on the nxed A‘s? .1 PETITIONER Babulal ‘ymdur S/ o Late Manbodh Smdur, aged about 52 yeals Head Master Governm ant Primaly School Bade Bhandar Block Pusour, Distt. Raigarh (CG) : Vs RE3PONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through z the Secre1ary, School Educational Depaxtment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distri :t—Raipur (CG) r 2. The Director, Public Instruction, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. 3. Distriot Education O$cer Raigarh District Raigarh (CG) 4. Block Education O$cer, Block—Pusour WW Wm agahwm ‘2, pay scale of Rs.300/ -. After completion of his probation period, he was regulan'zed but he was not given regular pay scale from the date of his Jmtlal appointment. Other sinnlarly situated teachers moved the State Adminisaative Tribunal, Ja ur for regular pay-scale wherein leanled Tribunal vide order d ted 24.8.1992 allowed, the same. This same issue in WP. (s) No.5976/06 . vide order dated 7.11.2006 irected the respondent authorities to consider the case of the peti 'oners. The petitioner approached the ' respondent authorities to acc rd the same treatment as he is also similarly situated, but, the res ondents have not paid any heed. Learned counsel for th petitioner submits that the petitioner may be allowed to make a repr sentation to the competent authority of "Court also While considering the respondents for giving simiilar treatment to the petitioner and same pay-scale, which has alread een sanctioned to. other similarly situate teacher on accoun of the order of State Admnistrative Trbunal a is ourt. Learne f the State h o objection if the petition is disposed with a directio to th resndnt to oider the case of the etitione. pr Having heard learned cunsel for the parties, having gard to th fts d circumstanc he ca n t cidere onion of this Court he limited pra‘ made by learned counsel for the . petitione appears to be reanable an therefore, the pitioner is alloed to akeaprsenio Within a pri f two eeks from oday to th competent authrit of e responnts rasing all his rvances and, in turn, the opetent authority of the respondent shall dcid th aid repsentaton, an oj manne, w a ee e s rei in bective r ithin b p e y b d s i i i nd th C d or as n n e poes cns o re e ac an es of t se, i he onsd pi t yn r so d et w minre'etatn eod o w t e oy th de i gie cm mmmm wg/V‘ pcxiod of eighf weeks from the after considering all the points r2 account the oxders passed by 1 'COUIt. Aécordingly, the petition direction; wwm WW éa‘mwm ate of receipt of such representation, Lised by the petitioner and taking into he Administrative Tribunal and this is disposed of with ,the aforesaid Sd/— Dhirendra Mishra Judge [View