IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.23036 of 2006 Between: Soorada Danamma … Petitioner And The Joint Collector, Visakhapatnam District & another. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : None Counsel for the respondents : AGP for Civil Supplies This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23036 of 2006 ORDER:- In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner in short is that her representation dated 29.10.2006 for re-verification of stocks seized from her fair price shop on 26.10.2006 has not been disposed of by respondent No.1. On 06.11.2006, this Court directed the respondents not to sell the seized stock, but observed that the said order will not preclude the authorities from conducting re-verification of the stock on the representation submitted by the petitioner. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies is unable to state whether any re-verification was done. In these facts of the case and in the light of the relief claimed in the writ petition, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.1 to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 29.10.2006 and pass appropriate order, if not already done, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.29344 of 2006 and WVMP.No.941 of 2007 are disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 11.06.2009 ES