MC 2248/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA By means of this application, the applicant, who has appeared in person, has prayed for restoration of the writ petition being WP(C) No. 4186/20 10, which was disposed of on merit by order dated 18.5.2011. For a ready referen ce, the order is reproduced below: By means of this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the Managing Director of the respondent Corporation to implement An nexure-D dated 27.04.2007 followed by further note dated 04.01.2010 (Annexure-H) by which the President’s Secretariat (Public Section), Rashtrapati Bhavan, New Delhi desired disposal of the petition filed by the petitioner for reconsiderati on of his case. The petitioner is a dismissed employee of the respondent Corpora tion and such dismissal was pursuant to a departmental proceeding relating to ch arge of long unauthorised absence from duty. The petitioner had earlier approach ed this Court by filing a writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 1978/97 which was dis missed by order dated 17.03.1998. Thereafter he had filed another writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 3943/1999 which was also dismissed by order dated 12.03.2004. The judgment was carried on appeal being WA No. 10/2005 which was also dismissed by judgment and order dated 18.12.2007 upholding the order of dismissal. The respondents in their counter affidavit have brought on recor d the Annexure-5 communication dated 26.03.2010 by which the aforementioned repr esentation of the petitioner was disposed of. In the communication it was record ed that the petitioner was dismissed on establishment of the guilt and thus ther e is no question of review of the order of dismissal. Thus, the prayer of the pe titioner for disposal of his representation has already been met with. Moreover, after dismissal of the petitioner from service which has also been affirmed by this Court, there is no question of reconsideration of the matter. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed. From the above, what is seen is that the petitioner was dismisse d from service pursuant to a departmental proceeding. The petitioner had earlier approached this Court by invoking writ jurisdiction. This Court dismissed the w rit petition against which the petitioner preferred a writ appeal which was also dismissed. After that he had approached the President of India for appropriate direction to the departmental authority to review the order of dismissal. Certai n communications were made by the Secretariat of the said authority, in terms of which the respondents disposed of the matter and intimated the same to the peti tioner by communication dated 26.3.2010. The matter having attained finality before the Division Bench, t his Court cannot reopen the same. All the material facts have been briefly narra ted in the order dated 18.5.2011, by which the writ petition was dismissed. The petitioner, who has appeared in person, seeks to argue the whole matter on merit . I am afraid such an approach cannot be permitted in a matter which has attaine d finality. For all the aforesaid reason, I do not find any merit in this ap plication and accordingly, it is dismissed.