IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 2ND SEPTEMBER 2010 / 11TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 27158 of 2010(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. ASWATHY P.S., DAUGHTER OF PRABHAKARAN, AGED 22 YEARS, SITHARA, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, KOYILANDY. 2. MANJU V.R., DAHGHTER OF P.K.VELAYUDHAN, AGED 22 YEARS, 'VANAMALI', KAKKATTUTHAZHAM, P.O.PUTHIYANGADI, PAVANGAD, CALICUT-21. 3. SUNEESH, SON OF RAMACHANDRAN, 21 YEARS, F-612, VIKAS NAGAR COLONY, CHAKKORATRTHUKULAM, CALICUT-673006. 4. BHAVYA A., DAUGHTER OF PRABHAKARAN, AGED 22 YEARS, AMBADI HOUSE, PALLIKURUP P.O., PALAKKAD-678 593. 5. ANJALI MADHUSUDANAN, DAUGHTER OF MADHUSUDANAN, AGED 23 YEARS, 'ANJALI', PUZHAKKATTIRI P.O., ANGADIPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 6. SHILPA SURESH, DAUGHTER OF SURESH, AGED 22 YEARS, CHOLAKKADI PARAMBA, POORATHARA ROAD, PAVANGAD, CALICUT-21. 7. ASWATHY THOMAS, DAUGHTER OF THOMAS, VETIKUZHIYIL, AGED 22 YEARS, CHAKKITTAPARA P.O., KAYANNA VIA., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 8. SRUTHI T.M., DAUGHTER OF SREEDHARAN, AGED 22 YEARS, 'S.S.VIHAR', NARATH ULLIYERI P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.MOHAMMED ASLAM WPC NO.27158/10 -2- RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP. BY REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, 'PAREEKSHA BHAVAN', UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.27158 OF 2010(T) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B. Tech Degree Course. It is stated that in respect of 6th and 8th semester examinations, they have failed in some of the papers and seeking revaluation of those answer papers, Exts.P1 to P8 applications were submitted. Petitioners submit that they have been recruited from the Campus for employment and the delay in completing the revaluation sought for is what is complained of in this writ petition. 2. Although the learned Standing Counsel for the University points out the practical difficulties and stated that the revaluation can be done in the order of priority in terms of the regulations, still I am not impressed by the said objections. This is for the reason that if the revaluation is inordinately delayed, that will result in the petitioners loosing the job opportunities. 3. Therefore I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been WPC.No.27158 /2010 :2 : received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/