IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No. 55 of 2009 Amar Singh Kandwal ………….Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand & others …..……Respondents. Mr. S.K. Mandal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 4. Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous on account of the fact that the road from Budna to Palakurali has already been constructed. It is, therefore, prayed that the instant writ petition be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the respondents states that he has no objection to the acceptance of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J) 19.5.2010 Avneet