IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8674 of 2010 PRAMOD CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 23.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail since 07.11.2009 in connection with a case registered under Sections 489(B), (C), 420/34 of the I.P.C. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that from the possession of co-accused Bishwajeet Mishra three 500/-rupee notes and two 50/- rupee notes were recovered which appeared to be fake. Hence no recovery was made from the possession of the petitioner and petitioner was roped in the present case only because he was in company with the co-accused Bishwajeet Mishra. It is further submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and a statement to that effect has been made in paragraph No. 12 of the present petition. Moreover it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that Bishwajeet Mishra has already been granted bail though no order has been produced in this regard. Learned counsel for the State admits that the recovery of the fake currency note was made form the possession of Bishwajeet Mishra and petitioner was a 2 companion. Considering the fact that recovery was not made from the possession of the petitioner, let the petitioner namely Pramod Chaudhary be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Bramhpura P.S. Case No. 147 of 2009. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)