1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7242/2008 Haribhau Rajendra Narwade .. PETITIONER VERSUS M.I.D.C. through C.E.O.Mumbai & Ors. ..RESPONDENTS .... Shri N.K.Kakade,Adv.for petitioner. Shri S.S.Dande, Adv. for Respondents 1 to 3. ... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & R.K.DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE :21/07/2009 ORAL ORDER : Present petition arises out of purely contractual rights between the parties and also involves various disputed questions of facts which we are afraid cannot be gone into under the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence 2 petition is rejected. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent M.I.D.C. makes a statement that the respondent M.I.D.C. would refund the amount to the petitioner which was deposited by the petitioner towards earnest money, within a period of 3 weeks from today. R.K.DESHPANDE] [B.R. GAVAI] JUDGE JUDGE umg/wp7242-08