c?n^^- ^^-s-z_ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION(c) NO...'i-ZL/of 2007 PETITIONER Pawan Kumar Sahu S/o Shri ^"..-••"\.- '/-''w •••'' Gangadeen Sahu, aged about 40 (/^•&'^'.""'...-""" ^ea^8,' Resident of Village chorbhatti, Tahsil-Kurud Dist. Dhamatari(C.G. ) VERSUS RES^ONDENTS 1 . 3 .4 "I ^- 8 State of Chhatisgarh through, Secretary Panchyat & Social Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Sub Dlvisional Officer cum Presiding Officer (R) Kurud Dist. Dhamatari (C.G.) Lokeshwar Sahu S/o Shri Ram Dayal Sahu, Ashwani Sahu S/o Shri Shobha Ram Sahu. Ghanshyam Sahu S/o Shri Ramcharan Sahu, The respondent No 3,4 & 5 are resident of Village- Chorbhatti, Tahsil- Kurud, Dist. Dhamatari (C.G.) The Returning Officer (Panchyat) Tahsildar Kurud Dist. Dhamatari(C.G.) S. K. Rathor S/o Shri Lakbeer Singh Rathore, aged about 40 years, (Presiding Officer Gram-Panchyat Chorbhatti) O/o GOvt. College Dhamatari Dist. Dhamatari (C.G.) C.L.Mishra S/o Shri Rajaram Mishra, aged about 52 years, (Presiding Officer Gram- Panchyat Chorbhatti Tahsil- Kurud), O/o Aurvedik Chikitshalay, Kodegaon B, Dist. Dhamatari (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CEERTIORARI, MZkNDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, OBDER OR ORDERES: sn^T^ii K;-<i.tl 311^1 gnwaffg »- DeepK! 'S^t •^WMI, yfw'ie, hwvy ^,^C^-/o^-. ^ww[ '*<<l-*" ' -"""""v7^""""'"g^ 2( SIT^T i^tigT ^lftcf SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastas^. J 07-03-2011 Shri R.S. Patel, counsei Tc Shri Suryakant Mishra, and2. By this petiUon, the legalt by the Election Tribunal by whii has been challenged. From the facts pleaded impugned, it is revealed that the January, 05. If that being so, etection is under chatlenge, is a petitioner submitted that there ar order of the Tribunal is pewers^ those issues because the issue The petition is finally infructuous. ^i^Fcf^Tl TTF^ff ^ 'feT^ '^R^R ii'siRtmsn^r >|- the pet'rtioner. P^nel Lawyer for the State/ r^pondent No.1 (y and validity of order dated 7/3/07 passed fh the election petition has been dismissed, in the petition and also from the order return candidate was etected in the month of |the tenure of the return candidate, whose ready over. Though teamed counsel for the ^ severat illegalities and irregulariUes and the and illegal, it is not necessary to go into all las become academic in nature. Idisposed oif as having been rendered Sd/- M.M. Shrivastava Judge [ift^ifS^r