3w. c Plea L. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. {gaff/200% (3.13.) PETITIONER : ,rSmt. Kalpana Tiwari, . " W/o Shri Vanshdhari Lal Tiwari, aged about 46 years, Ro Near Hardev Lal Mandir, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSS U RESPONDENTS 15 Statc of Chhattisgarh, / Through Secretaly , Education Dcpartment , D.K.S. Bhawan Rajpur(C.G.) Director of public Instruction , Pensionbada Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA 3% / HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (5) N0. 1G85 of 200i Pe‘fi'rioner : Smf. Kalpana Tiwari Versus S‘i’a‘l’e 0f Chhaf?€sgurh & ano‘fher Respondenfs Siagie Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Jusfice 5a?ish K. Agniho'rri. AM. Kumaresh Tiwari, Adyocate for The pe‘mioner. 5m1’. Anju Ahuja, Depui’y 6nvernmen? Advoca'fe far- fhe Sfafe/respendenfs. O R D E R (Passed on 'H'Iis 26““ Day of February, 2007) Learned counsei appearing for The pe‘H’iioner submi‘i's fna'r The pe‘ri'fioner is working as Assishn‘i’ Teacher/Lecturer. The pe‘i’ifioner obfamed S. Ed. Examinafior: cerfificafe or 23-5-1994, art his awn expanses, Learned counsel appearing for “the pe'ri‘l'ioner submi‘rs ‘i’ha'i‘ ‘rhe quesnon involved, herein asio whether “the Teacher, who ob‘iained B. Ed. Examina‘iion Ceriifica‘i’e on his own expenses is en'riHed 1'o Two advance incremeni's. Aocording fo ieorned counsel for 1he pefifioner, “fhe pe‘i'i-lioner is en'l’i'l'led To iwo advance increments in View of fhe decision of This Cour? in 'rhe case of Yashwam Kumor Bhamdwaj Vs. inunicipol Conporoiion, Dung and onoi’her {200$ (II) MPJR-CG 96}. This Cour'f in 'ihe case of Vashwan'r Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and anoiher (5upna), came ‘l’o ihe conclusion Thai fhe 'feachers, i who had obfained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examina’iion Ceriifioa'ie on Their own @ expenses, are covere& by fhe circuiar dufad 24.12.98 issued by 'i'he 5fafe Governmeni' of Madhya Pradesh. Learned counsei for- ‘fhe pe'rifimier fur‘fher submi‘i's 'i'ha‘i’ The facfs and quesi’ion of law invcived én 'i'he presen‘i' case are squarely covered by decisian of f'nis Cour-r in 'Hne case of Yashwan'f Kumar Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipal Corpora'i‘ion, Durg and ano‘fher (Supra), fo which {earned counsel appearing for fhe rasponden'i’s fairiy concedes and agrees wi'i'h ‘Hne avermerrf made by iearned counsel appearing for ’i'he pefi‘i’ioner. Accordingly, 'l'he wri‘i' pe'ri'i'ion is aiiowed in ierms of fne order passed in ‘i’he case‘ of Yoshwan‘i’ Kumar Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipai Corporai-ion, Durg and anoi'her, (Supra), subject +o verifica'rion of fhe facf as fo whefher f'ne pe‘rifioner has acquired B. Ed. Examina'rion Cerfificafe on his own expenses as per fhe circulars dafed 24.12.1998 6i 1.3.1999 and fur'l’her whefher he 'nas been paid Two advance incremenfs or not No order as fo cosfs. 1 i Sdl- 1 J Satish K.Agnihem 3 Judge ‘A 5ubhash ‘