IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.THANKAPPAN WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2006 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1928 RP.No. 1016 of 2006(C) ---------------------- JUDGEMENT IN WPC.NO.24173/2006 Dated 27/10/2006 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/2ND RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------- SAJIKUMAR.K.C., KATTANAM HOUSE, EREVIPEROOR P.O., THIRUVALLA. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER & IST RESPONDENT ---------------------------------------- 1. THIRUVALLA EAST CO-OP.BANK LTD NO. 3260, P.B.NO.4, ERAVIPEROOR P.O., THIRUVALLA, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, (GENERAL), PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADVS. SRI.T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR-R1 SRI. V.G.ARUN GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.M.NAZAR -R2 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/11/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.THANKAPPAN, J. ---------------------------------------- R.P.NO. 1016 OF 2006 IN W.P.(C)NO.24173 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2006 O R D E R The second respondent in the above Writ Petition is the review petitioner. By the impugned judgment, this Court set aside Ext.P9 order passed by the Joint Registrar and directed the Joint Registrar to consider the matter afresh and take a decision. This Court had already found that the action taken by the Joint Registrar shall not be on the basis of a complaint filed by a third party like the review petitioner. The review petitioner was made a party in an earlier Writ Petition and though notice was served on him, he did not appear. Heard the review petitioner. A review petition cannot be equated with an appeal or re-hearing of the matter. No ground is made out to review the judgment dated 27.10.2006. The Review Petition is accordingly dismissed. (K.THANKAPPAN, JUDGE) sp/ 2