^ ^). / /^ INJ'HE^HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHAmSGARH WRIT PETITION N0 ^-3/T~ OF 2004. PETITIONER -^^' ..••'"i^' 'l.*' ff, ^A^^ ^f^ . .•••". "^\>" ^••^.^'''^ ^" ..-•'' t^> ^v VERSES Mukund Mohani raj manohar, Jay kisan Beej Bhandar anand bhawan Gadeshram Nagar Raipur Tehsil and distt Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENT / Anant Rai Majethiya aged about 63 year S/o Durlabji Majethiya R/o Civil lines Raipur, Tehsil and Distt- Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 w '3^'-'(j<fljel«,''aiTi)'u<w,t'(wti'S3< 3TT^?T 11^7 . W-^o,5S4-/^a^. "W^ 200 •fluen aiHich ^%r' 311^1 ?iT R-ii.'sb sn^r ^l^ ^f^fl Ki^ "-V l^, aii^i wnw(?ato Shri Ritesfa Ahuja, Ad-VQcat' ApplicatiQn for urgent hear}ng is allowed. I.A. No, S97/-2004for urgerlt hearmg is allowed. Heard. The :has been filed 2003 whereby thei Court betow against the order dated 9-10- jias aUowed an application for ^mendment filed by the responde^it/plaintiff. The trial coitrt has ;oiisidered and allowed the appycation on the ground fhat if it |s iiotallowed, it wiU result in !]|i^]ltiplicity of proceeduigs. The (trial Court had the jurisdicticjri and it had exercised the Rurisdiction on souiid reasons. Having considered the facts ^tid on perusal of the order of t Ifhe'law laid down by fhe Apex (|'x>urt in fhe case of Si-uya Dev^ pai vs Ramachander Rai j-gportep inAER .2003 SC 3044 aswell as in fhe case of Raniit Singh J33004 {4} SG'.,A2»:::in the opirjien of this Court, there is' no grrbr of jurisdiction nor any ill^gality in the .impugiied order warraiiting interference i-md^r. Article 226/227 of the 'onstitution of India. This petition fails and is d}; ';onsequenfly,| M.W.P.No..:. of. chf'q[<n<il'i 'WRTf '4l^t^ if^R^K i? aifigir an^i • , for the petitiorier. -and-cireunistances offlie case te Court below and in view of ws Ra»i Prakasb. reported ^ in smissed. 06/2004 also stands disposed Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge. III 'u «a B ww