IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 3621 of 2010 Date of decision: 18.03.2010 Kavita and another ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: None for the petitioner Mr. Gourav Dhir, Haryana for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Reply of Deputy Superintendent of Police (HQ) on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3 has been filed in Court today. The same is taken on record. As per the aforesaid reply, both the petitioners have approached respondent No. 3 for setting out their grievances and sworn affidavits to the effect that their parents have recognised their marriage and that there is no requirement of police protection to safe the life and liberty of the petitioners. In view of the above, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Disposed of as such. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge March 18, 2010 mohan