BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE (Cl N0. (?3^ /2011 (ARISING OUT OF AN ORDER DATED 07.07.2011 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI IN W.P. (C) N0.2630/2009) PETITIONER 1) Swaroop Chand Jain, S/o Lt.Shri Mohanlal Jain, Agend about 50 years, %,'& Sainbhalpur, Dist. KankerfC.G-; ?^€%r 2' ^•'^ RESPONDENT 1) 2) 3) Suresh Jain, S/o Lt. Shri Mohanlal Jain, Aged about 46 years, R/o Sambhalpur, Dist. Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS Prafull Kumar Kesar, Aged about 51 years, Divisional Forest Officer, Department of Forest, Purp Bhanupratapur, Dist.- Kanker (C.G^ Nirmal Kumar Khakha,. Aged about 53 years, The Collector, Dist. Kanker (C.G.) Dr.D.S.Anant, Aged about 55 years, Secretaiy, Department of Forest, DKS Bhavan, G.E.Road, Raipur (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 10 OF CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT 1971 BI^I^TtoTSi; iwraii^ian^ Dsepii ^ST •*l!*)|(v)t), riiTlly'l^, 'f^TRT^ (C')wo.^>^cl//( "^iod ^e sn^'1 'v!9 (^(j»)<^st) wnw ^aftsf an^i !. SB L HQn'ble Shn Manindta Mohaji Shnvastaya^v, 10-1 n-2011 Shri Adhiraj Surana, counsel dated 7/7/2011 passed in W.P.(C ^t^i^ ITTO^Jf ^ fS--'^ Tf^^j!. ^sTRmsn^Ti IForthepetitJoners. Learned counsel for the petitjoners very fairly submits that against the order > No.2630/09, the petitioners as wetl as the respondent / State in the writ petjUon have preferred appeal which is pending considering. In that view of the matter, i a^i not inciined to issue notice at this stage. The petition is therefore dibposed off however, reserving liberty to the petitioners to revive the contempt p^tition if the eyemuaiity so arrees,_,,. ? Sd/- , Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge •• I'BIIW, n'a.lI<?ITi—!''S;;<o—2720' i —1,50,000. J...