Crl. Revision No.1098 of 2005 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Revision No.1098 of 2005 Date of Decision:-14.10.2010 Sukhmander Singh. ......Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana. ......Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL. Present:- Mr. Gurcharan Singh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. J.S. Rattu, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for respondent-State. *** A.N. JINDAL, J.(ORAL) Challenge in this petition is to the judgment dated 31.3.2005 passed by Sessions Judge, Sirsa dismissing the appeal against the judgment dated 21.7.2004 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sirsa convicting and sentencing the accused to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- for an offence punishable under Section 377 of Indian Penal Code. However, during the appeal the sentence was reduced to five years. Mr. J.S. Rattu, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana has Crl. Revision No.1098 of 2005 #2# produced the custody certificate furnished by Mr. J.S. Sethi, Superintendent, District Jail, Sirsa on an affidavit which reveals that the accused has already undergone the entire sentence. Even otherwise having scrutinized the impugned judgment the same is well founded and well reasoned. The evidence appears to have been appreciated in the right prospective. The ocular version is supported by medical evidence and re-appreciation of the evidence is not permissible at this revisional stage. No error apparent on the face of the record has been indicated which may result into miscarriage or failure of justice inviting interference by this court at this revisional stage. No ground to interfere. Dismissed. ( A.N. JINDAL ) JUDGE 14th October, 2010 Vinay