THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.5703 OF 2010 Dated 23rd April, 2010 Between: Nurjahan Sultana …Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh and 2 others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.T.Ravi Kumar Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Home The Court made the following: Order: The alleged inaction of the respondents in bringing the real culprits to book in Crime No.12 of 2010 registered under Section 174 Cr.P.C., is questioned in this Writ Petition. The son of the petitioner viz., Md.Ali Abbas died by jumping into a canal. The above-mentioned Crime was registered under Section 174 Cr.P.C. The petitioner filed this Writ Petition with the main grievance that the parents of a girl viz., Tasneem, who threatened the deceased against his falling in love with their daughter and his attempts to marry her, were responsible for the death of the deceased. Respondent No.3- Inspector of Police, Suryaraopet Police Station, Vijayawada City, filed a counter-affidavit wherein it is inter alia stated that the Section of law in the above-mentioned Crime was altered to Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code by showing Tasneem and her parents as accused and that the investigation is under progress. While stating that there is no prima facie evidence of the involvement of the said accused, it is further stated that after obtaining chemical analysis report from the Regional Forensic Science Laboratory, Vijayawada and a final report from the Professor, Forensic Medicine, GGH, Vijayawada, the case will be finalised and an appropriate report will be submitted before the Court concerned at the earliest. Sri T.Ravi Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that so far the Police have not examined the petitioner and recorded her statement. If this allegation is correct, I do not find any reason for the Police not to examine the petitioner, who is no other than the mother of the deceased. The Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.3 to record the statement of the petitioner, if not already done, before completing the investigation and file appropriate report before the jurisdictional Magistrate. Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.7359 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 23rd April, 2010 lur