g3 Q? ( 676 A @mga‘i"; E§§M§E IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. s. No. 355 2‘ OF 2009 / Shiv Narayan Chaubey S/o Shri B.L. Chaubey , aged about—4O years, R.H.E.O. ( Rural Horticulture Extension Officer) R/o Village— Bandhi P.O. Bachharwar Tahsil— Pendra Distt, Bilaspur (C.G.). PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1./State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, . Agriculture Department , D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2.(/Director, Fruits and Gardens , Raipur C.G.) . Assistant Director, Govt. Fruits Gardens Distt. Bilaspur. o 93?. t 3 \fc ”Gardens Superintendent, Fruits Gardens, .6 ‘ f Patgawan Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ’ t c @ g H§$H CQUR? 9F CE—EHKE‘HSgGH K? BELASPUR éHan. EV iuszéce §3ritinkenr Eiiwakw; Wr§i Pemaa%1 {S} M). 3352 0f 2W§ Shiv Narayan Chaubey PE?§TE®E‘§§R ' VERSUS RESP$NBENTS State of Chhatiisgarh and others. 3m MK. Sinha counsel fGr the petitioner‘ Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur and Shri Shashank Thakur, PL for the respcndents/State. WRW PETETSGN UNDER ARTECIE 22$ OF THE CONSTlTUTwN OF lNDiA ORDER maeizeaa) With the consent of the coun3e§ far the parties, the matter is heard g. finaHy. ChaHenge in this petition is to the order dated 30.6.2009 (Annexure P4) passed by respondent No.1 by which the petitioner has been trans? rred from Frui’rs and Gardens, Patganwan (Pendra) to 8ioci< Charema, District Kanker, on administraiive grounds. Counsei for the petitioner submits inert the petitioner may be permitied to withdraw this petition with liberty io make a representation to the authorities concerned. A direction to the authorities conoemed for eariy disposai of the representation has aiso been prayed for, to which oouneet for the respondents/State has no objection Accordingty, the petition is dismissed as wtthdrawn with tiberty as aforesaid tt is directed that if the petitioner makes a representation within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same wouid be decided by the authorities concerned within a further period ot three weeks from the date of its receipt strictiy in accordance with iaw. it is made ciear that no opinion on the merits of the case has been expressed by this Court and the authorities concerned shaii be at iitoerty to decide the representation strictiy in accordance with iaw. i, Sd/- I , 1x Pritinker Diwaker Judge i