CR No. 3861 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CR No. 3861 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.09.2010 Subhash Chand Gulati and another ....Petitioner Versus Narinder Pal Singh and another ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Arun Luthra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Keshav Kataria, Advocate for respondent No.1 and 2. Mr. Aditya Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.4. ... Alok Singh, J.(Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 14.5.2010 whereby application of the petitioners seeking impleadment in the eviction petition claiming themselves to be co-owners, was dismissed. Learned counsel for the tenant argued that eviction petitioner who has filed earlier eviction petition is not the landlord. Learned counsel for the tenant further states that the present petitioners have also filed CR No. 3861 of 2010 2 eviction petition against the tenant in the same very Court, which was listed for 30.8.2010. The question as to whether present petitioner is the landlord or the eviction petitioner is the landlord, who has filed eviction petition which is subject matter of the controversy, shall be decided by the Rent Controller. However, in view of the fact that present petitioners have filed eviction petition against the tenant, it would be appropriate that both the petitions filed by the present petitioner as well as Narinder Pal Singh shall be heard together to avoid conflicting judgement. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 27.09.2010 sk.