CR No.6973 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.6973 of 2010 (O&M) Decided on : 26-10-2010 Bagga Singh and another ....Petitioners VERSUS Om Parkash @ Kala and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr.Deepak Sabherwal , Advocate for the petitioners. MAHESH GROVER, J Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that if the petitioners are granted only one opportunity, they will complete their entire evidence and further contends that effectually they have only availed of two opportunities. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners and perusing the impugned order, I am of the considered opinion that there is no legal infirmity committed by the learned Trial Court by closing the evidence of the petitioner while noticing the fact that the matter has been pending for the said purpose since 2008. However, purely in the interest of justice, one opportunity is granted to the petitioners to conclude their entire evidence subject to Rs.5,000/- as costs. The Court also deems it proper to dispose of the revision petition without issuance of notice of motion to other side for the simple reason that resorting to this process is likely to delay the proceedings CR No.6973 of 2010 (O&M) 2 further and equitable justice can always be ensured by compensating the other side with costs. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with an observation that the Trial Court shall grant only one effective opportunity to the petitioners subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- as costs. In this eventuality, the impugned order stands set aside. October 26, 2010 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge