IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.20866 of 2008 SUNITA KUMARI Vrs. THE STATE OF BIHAR **** /3/ 28.07.2008 Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the bail application. 2. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State. 3. Petitioner is the Child Development Project Officer. As per the allegation, she is said to have identified Rehana Begum @ Shajehan Begum though appointment was made as Shahjehan Begum. Counsel for the petitioner submits that she has identified the photographs on the basis of report of Mukhiya and by comparing the candidate with her photograph subsequent to appointment made much earlier. 4. Considering the facts, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner, Sunita Kumari, is allowed. She is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, on her surrender before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 85 of 2007 to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahna, East Champaran at Motihari, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )