IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 890 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 165 OF 2009 HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMTED ... Applicant Versus M/S. RAMNATH D. MAUZO AND SONS THROUGH PARTNERS ... Respondent Mr. A. R. Kantak, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Ninotska Pimenta, Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- R. M. SAVANT, J. Date:- 4th November, 2009 P.C. The above Civil Application has been filed for extension of time to deposit the amount of Rs.3,00,000/- which was ordered to be deposited by this Court by Order dated 05.08.2009, within a period of eight weeks. The said period has expired on 30.09.2009. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that the cheque dated 05.10.2009 has been received by him from his client, however, on account of the time having elapsed, the said cheque could not be deposited. The reasons for the delay have been mentioned in the Civil Application. The learned Counsel for the Respondent has no objection to the said cheque being deposited. 2. Hence, for the reasons mentioned in the application, the time to deposit the said amount of Rs.3,00,000/- is extended by a period of two weeks from date. 3. Civil Application is accordingly disposed off. R. M. SAVANT, J. arp/*