CWP (T) No. 14574 of 2008 11.11.2009 Present: Mr. P.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General with Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 3.. The petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No.4 as Anganwari worker, Gater. The petitioner has not placed the appointment letter of respondent No.4 on record. In absence of appointment letter, the appointment of respondent No.4 cannot be quashed. It appears from the pleadings that respondent No.4 was initially appointed at Bemu and was subsequently transferred to present place of posting. It is clear from the Notification Annexure A-6 that as far as possible efforts should be made that Anganwari workers have not to travel from long distances. It is apparent that respondent No.4 has been transferred to present place of posting, that is, Gater as per Annexure A-6. Consequently, there is no merit in the Writ Petition. The same is dismissed. ( R.B. Misra ), Acting Chief Justice. November 11, 2009. ( Rajiv Sharma), (rks) Judge.