IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-25256 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 23.8.2011 Amarjit Kaur ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Mr.G.S.Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The grievance of the petitioner stems from a threat to her possession of some property. The plea that this Court should intervene under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to grant her protection by giving appropriate directions to the respondent-State, is totally misconceived. The petitioner has efficacious remedies to protect her possession by filing appropriate proceedings. Likewise, in the wake of some grievance against the persons, who are threatening her possession by indulging in activities that are violative of law and invite criminality, the petitioner has an equal efficacious remedy to approach the court of competent jurisdiction under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. The powers of the Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in the Crl.Misc.No.M-25256 of 2011 (O&M) -2- given set of circumstances are not the remedy. Consequently, the instant petition being devoid of merit is dismissed. 23.8.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss