IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 14TH JUNE 2010 / 24TH JYAISTHA 1932 RP.No. 442 of 2010 --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WA.5/2010 DATED 4.2.2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT: -----------------------------------0-------- DILEEF B,FORESTER, FOREST RANGE OFFICE,ANCHAL,KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM VAKKANAL, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.AUGUSTINE JOSEPH RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT & RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4: ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. BIJU.S,FORESTER, RANGE OFFICE,RANNI. 2. STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY THE SECRETARY, FORESTS & WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS IHRD,FOREST HEAD QUARTERS,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE PRINCIPAL,KERALA FOREST SCHOOL, ARIPPA,KULATHUPUZHA,KOLLAM. R1 BY ADV.SRI.ELVIN PETER.P.J. R2 TO R4 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.MEERA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.Chelameswar, C.J. & P.N.Ravindran, J. ------------------------------------------ R.P. No.442 of 2010 in W.A.No.5 of 2010 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 14th day of June, 2010 ORDER Ravindran, J. Heard Sri.Abraham Vakanal, learned senior counsel appearing for the review petitioner. 2. After going through the review petition and hearing the submissions made at the Bar, we are not satisfied that adequate grounds have been made out warranting a review of the judgment in W.A.No.5 of 2010. What the petitioner seeks is a rehearing of the writ appeal which is not permissible in a petition for review. In such circumstances, we find no grounds to entertain the review petition. The Review Petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. J.Chelameswar, Chief Justice P.N.Ravindran, Judge vns