In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 2950 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: May 22, 2009 Malti Devi .. Petitioner Vs. Nirmala and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J The petitioner has assailed the order dated 15.5.2009 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Kurukshetra, closing the evidence of the defendant by order while observing that it was the seventh opportunity to the defendant to produce entire evidence. On examination of the record it transpires that after the amendment of the written statement on 17.3.2009, it was the second opportunity. In any case, it appears that the intention of the defendant was not to prolong the matter, as such with an object to impart complete justice to the parties and to provide full opportunity to the defendant to lead evidence, I allow the petition and the court would provide one month to the defendant to conclude his evidence from the date of receipt of copy of the order, subject to payment of Rs.2000/- as costs. This petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondents with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondents as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondents may move to this court for recalling this order. May 22, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge