IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 29TH MARCH 2011 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 139 of 2011(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- LINTOMON, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O. ANDREWS, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, MALAINCHI KARA, KARUMANNOOR, UDUMBANOOR VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.THOMAS J.ANAKKALLUNKAL SRI.UNNI SEBASTIAN KAPPEN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. RAGHAVAN NAIR, PERUDUKKAM HOUSE, KOTTODY.P.O., RAJAPURAM VIA, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 671 121. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KASARAGOD. 671 121. 3. THE S.I. OF POLICE, RAJAPURAM POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD.671 121. ADV. SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH FOR R1 SMT.HEMALATHA FOR R1 R2 & R3 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI C.M.KAMMAPPU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(CRL).NO.139 OF 2011 A PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF MONEY BY THE REGISTRAR OFFICE, THODUPUZHA FOR RECEIVING THE APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 5 OF SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE AGREEMENT DATED 03.02.2011. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE SWORN STATEMENT GIVEN BY THE DETENU BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, HOSDURG, DATED 08.02.2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// PS TO JUDGE K.M. JOSEPH & M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(CRL).NO. 139 OF 2011 S ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 29th March, 2011 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a Writ of Habeas Corpus for production of the daughter of the first respondent. Allegation of illegal detention is made against the first respondent. 2. Today, the alleged detenu was present before us. So was the petitioner and his mother. The first respondent was also present. 3. The alleged detenu would tell us that there is no illegal detention as such and she does not want to go with the petitioner. We allowed the alleged detenu to interact with the petitioner. Thereafter, again, we called the case and we interacted with the alleged detenu, her father, the petitioner and his mother. The W.P.(CRL).NO.139/2011 S 2 alleged detenu reiterates that she wants to go with her father. In such circumstances, we see no illegal detention as alleged and we close the Writ Petition. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE kbk. //True Copy//