IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 11449 of 2008. Decided on: 23.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Surekha Rani. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): It is not in dispute that the present lis is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Madan Lal Tomar and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, CWP(T) No.6018 of 2008, decided on 22.3.2010. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in view of the principles laid down in the judgment cited above, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 23, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?