BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Fifth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms. Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.11639 of 2011 1 RAMESH 2 SENTHILKUMAR ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 4 & 5 Vs STATE : REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SRIVILLIPUTHUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. CR.NO.15 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498(A) and 406 I.P.C. and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.15 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that a case has been registered under Sections 498(A) and 406 I.P.C. and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act against five persons. He further submitted that A1 to A3 were already arrested and enlarged on bail, these petitioners are A4 and A5, they are none other than the brother of A1. He further submitted that the petitioners are no way connected in the alleged commission of offence and they are residing far away from the defacto complainant and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that these petitioners along with the other accused have demanded dowry from the defacto complainant's family and hence, a case has been registered against five persons. He further submitted that A1 to A3 were already arrested and enlarged on bail, these petitioners are A4 and A5 and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the petitioners are only brother-in-laws of the defacto complainant and they are residing at Bodi and A1 to A3 were already arrested and enlarged on bail and the investigation is considerably over, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate II, Srivilliputhur and on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Bodi, daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 05/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, SIVILLIPUTHUR. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SRIVILLIPUTHUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate SR. No.29839 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11639 of 2011 Date :05/09/2011 RJ/7.9.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/