IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 26.08.2010 C.R.No.5321 of 2010 Jagga Singh ...Petitioner Versus Harnek Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The petitioner is plaintiff, who has filed a suit for permanent injunction. The grievance of the petitioner is that in violation of ad interim injunction granted by the learned trial Court on 11.06.2003, the defendants have demolished the boundary wall. By virtue of an application, which has been decided by the impugned order dated 08.06.2010, the restoration of the boundary wall has been declined. The questions; whether the boundary wall was demolished in violation of the ad interim injunction order or; whether the plaintiff is entitled for restoration of the same, are the questions which are required to be decided on the basis of evidence to be led by both the parties. It has been so found by the learned trial Court as well. In view of the said fact, no direction for restoration of the boundary wall can be issued in favour of the petitioner at this stage without permitting the parties to lead evidence on such questions. Consequently, the present revision petition is dismissed. 26.08.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE