IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2009 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 29709 of 2008(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MAGIC BROTHERS TOURISM PRIVATE LIMITED, 1/189, BEACH ROAD, KUZHUPILLY, AYYAMPILLY P.O ERNAKULAM - 632 501, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR.KARL TOM BYRNE. BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, CHIRAYINKEEZHU. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, EDAVA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SR. M.A. SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPEDIX Ext.P1. True copy of the certificate of incorporation issued to the petitioner by the Registrar of Companies dated 21.10.2005. Ext.P2. True copy of the Sale Deed No.963/07 of SRO, Varkala dated 13,.3.2007 Ext.P3. True copy of the Sale Deed No.964/07 f SRO Varkala, dated 13.3.2007. Ext.P4. True copy of the report of the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent dated 16.10.2007. Ext.P5. True copy of the report of the 2nd respondent to the Ist respondent dated 12.11.2007. Ext.P6. True copy of the legal opinion of the District Government Pleader, Thiruvananthpauram submitted to the Ist respondent o 1.3.2008.\ Ext.P7. True copy of the representation submitted by the petitioner to the Ist respondent dated 29.5.2008. // true copy // P.A to Judge. ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No.29709 OF 2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of March, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner, a company incorporated under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act acquired certain immovable properties as per Exts.P2 and P3. It is stated that there upon, they sought mutation of the property in their favour by filing Ext.P7 application before the 2nd respondent. Orders have not been passed and thereupon this writ petition is filed. 2. Learned Government Pleader on instruction confirms the pendency of Ext.P7 application and according to him Ext.P7 has been forwarded by the 2nd respondent to the first respondent and that the matter is pending before the Ist respondent. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P7 and pass orders WP(c).No.29709/08 /2/ thereon as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.29709/08 /2/