IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3937 of 2011 Decided on: 31st May, 2011. Tilak Raj. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & another. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Aggrieved by Annexure P-2, order of transfer, the petitioner has pointed out his grievances before the second respondent by way of Annexure P-3, representation. We are informed that the petitioner has not yet been relieved pursuant to the impugned order of transfer dated 22nd April, 2011. There will be a direction to the second respondent to look into Annexure P-3 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. 2 2. In case the petitioner has not been relieved as on today, further proceedings in that regard will be deferred till orders are passed, as above. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 31st May, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr) Judge. 3