1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.PETITION NO.2058/2010 Yogesh & Anr. Vs. State Date of order : 3/11/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri D.D. Khandelwal for the petitioners. Shri Peeyush Kumar, P.P. for the State. Shri Ripunjay Sharma for the complainant. ****** This petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the accused-petitioners challenging the order of charge dated 25.10.2008 for offence u/s.332 and 353 of IPC. It is contended that during the pendency of the present petition, the matter has been compromised between the parties and that respondent no.2 has filed his affidavit to the effect that he has compromised the matter with the petitioners and he does not want any action against the petitioners. He would have no objection if the proceedings in the present case are quashed. Shri Ripunjay Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.2 has also made similar submissions and has argued that respondent no.2 now has settled the dispute with the petitioners and that he wants to put an end to this prosecution and therefore the present petition may be allowed and the impugned order dated 25.10.2008 and the proceedings pending before the court below be quashed. 2 The compromise deed is on record, which has been signed by both the petitioners and the complainant, who have been identified by their counsels. Having regard to the fact that the complainant himself has come forward to say that he does not want the prosecution to go and the proceedings may be quashed because he has compromised the matter, there is no likelihood of prosecution now succeeding, therefore, there is no point in keeping such proceedings pending. In view of above, the petition deserves to be allowed and is accordingly allowed. The impugned order dated 25.10.2008 framing charge for offence u/s.332 and 353 IPC is quashed and set aside and the proceedings pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.6, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Criminal Case No.186/2008, State vs. Yogesh & Ors. are quashed and set aside. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/-