Civil Revision No. 7496 of 2009 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No. 4807-CII of 2010 and Civil Revision No. 7496 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 26 , 2010 Preeti and another ...... Petitioners Versus Smt. Mahindro alias Mahinder Kaur and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. CM No. 4807-CII of 2010 For the reasons recorded, this application is allowed and the matter is preponed to today with the consent of learned counsel for the petitioner. Civil Revision No. 7496 of 2009 This petition has been filed against an order rejecting application under Order 7 rule 11 CPC filed by the petitioners praying that the plaint filed by the respondents be rejected on the ground that the same is barred by limitation. The learned Court, after hearing the parties, has come to the Civil Revision No. 7496 of 2009 (O&M) 2 conclusion that in the given circumstances the question of limitation raised by the petitioners is a mixed question of law and fact. Learned counsel has not been able to persuade me that this finding suffers from such material irregularity as to be liable for interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Consequently this revision is dismissed. Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE February 26 , 2010 sunita