IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Third Bail Application No. 2272/2010 Medha @ Mehruda Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 16.3.2010 Hon'ble Mr Justice MN Bhandari Mr Ghanshyam Brijwasi – for petitioner Mr GS Fauzdar – PP for the State BY THE COURT: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there exist contradictions in the statements of witnesses as what they stated while recording statements under section 161 CrPC is not stated in court. This is apart from the fact that only 'lathi' was recovered from possession of petitioner whereas allegation is for causing injury with 'pharsa'. Injury of the nature as alleged in the FIR does not exist. PW 3 in the statement has reiterated aforesaid position. In view of aforesaid submissions, petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned PP, on the other hand, opposed the bail application and submits that second bail application was rejected by this court on 9.2.2010 and there exist no change of circumstances thereafter. PW 3 was examined much prior to rejection of second bail application and all arguments were available or even raised while arguing first and second bail applications thus could not be raised again. After considering rival submissions of learned counsel for parties without commenting on merits of the case which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, I am of the view that petitioner is not entitled for bail . The bail application is accordingly dismissed. (MN Bhandari)J. bnsharma