IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-20598 of 2009 Date of Decision : August 25, 2009 Dilbagh Ram .... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG, Punjab. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Joginder Pal Singh, states that in inquiry conducted by Head Constable, the petitioner had been found innocent, but the said report is yet to be accepted by the competent authority. Presently, the petitioner is not required to be arrested in the case. In view of the aforesaid, the instant petition for anticipatory bail is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. However, if at any subsequent stage, the petitioner is sought to be arrested in the case, he shall be given at least seven days' prior notice in writing. August 25, 2009 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE