IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 1st Bail Application No.960 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Riyasat Ali .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party __________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.2792/10, U/s 3/25 of Arms Act, PS Tanakpur, Distt. Champawat __________________________________________________________ Dated: November 9, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. BS Adhikari, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. BS Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that though the arrest was made at the public place, however no public witness was shown at the time of recovery and even at present there is no report of the Expert that the weapon shown to be recovered from the possession of the applicant was in the working condition. Lastly he is in jail since 19.9.10. After considering all the facts and circumstances and without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Champawat. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) November 9, 2010 Rdang