IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1909 of 2011 VIJAY TELANG AND ANOR ..VS.. M/S SPENTEX INDUSTRIES LIMITED - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. D A T E : APRIL 21, 2011. Heard Shri Meghe for the petitioner and Shri Puranik for the respondent. The Industrial court, Nagpur did not commit any error in rejecting the application filed by the petitioners under section 30(2) of the M.R.T.U. & P.U.L.P. Act 1971 seeking a stay to the effect, implementation and operation of the order dated 6.9.2010 issued by the respondent denying the medical allowance to the petitioners. The Industrial Court, on an appreciation of the provisions of clause 26 of the settlement dated 7.7.2009 observed that it prima-facie showed that the medical allowance could have been discontinued, if the contingency as provided in clause 26 of the settlement existed. The court found that there was nothing on record to show that the medical allowance was excluded from the term “Medical Benefits” as appeared in clause 26 of the settlement. Even otherwise, granting of interim relief in this case would have resulted almosdt in granting final relief to the petitioners though the Industrial court was of the view that the petitioners did not have a prima facie case. Since the order passed by the Industrial Court is just and proper, the same calls for no interference in exercise of the writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE SMP