-HC-22 sii^r^i R-ii.'* sn^T 5^vt\^ -M^a T"I •^IWId^, »T)i^'is,f»«ni'Mi< 3T(^?T 'V^SR ^....M,.A:...Cfe3.....^:^ 1/f^7_ IIIWI ttrtirai ftre^r" sn^r TOitwnfeT SB :HO BLE ^IM DHIREMdRA MISHRA. j M.A.fC ApPBLLANT CLAIMANT RESPONDBBT8 NOH-CLAIMAMT8 v^ 1. 2 3 20.07.2007 award dated 16.11.2006 m Q- learued Additional Motor '01<<[c]<I1-l WV-S ^ fS^S <f»l(t;l< i? aipgil 3D^i N0. 241/2007 Ramkhiiawau, S/o. BaawaUrani, By Caste Sahu, aged about 36 years, R/o. Vilalge-Chandaabuiti, Tahsil Gurur, District Dui^ (CG) Rakesh Smlia, S/o. Raiadayal Siaha, aged about 35 years, R/o. Purur, Tahsil Gurur, District Durg (CG) Occupation Drivcr Dayaratn Ji Agrawal, S/o.-, Shri Ghasiram AgrawaJ, aged aboiit 51 years, R/o. Shanti Colony, Dharatari, TahsU & District Dhamtari (CG) Braach Maaager, 'The New India Insurance Coinpany Limited, Thakkar Bhawan, G.E.Road, Bhilai, District Duig (CG) coufasel for the appeUaat. br respondent No. 1, Dr.Saajeet Shanna, Shri P.P.Sahu, couasel f: None for respondent No.|: Shri Sourabh Sharma, (jounsel for respondent No.3. Heard. The appeliaat/claunaatl has preferred this appeal agauist the paim Case No. 650/2004 whereby the Ac<|ddent Claims Tribunal, Dhamtari has > ^nn I XI-HC-22 sn^r^ii h-t sv^i ?nMicti <i^tT 'SSt ^Wv\<\, afll^y'is, fsiwwy sn^T xra^? *11*1CT| g,t,]eo—'--'--------^^gg 'iN^sr' an^I'TOIIWBfCT -s> wto awarded a suin of Rs. 25,000; the mjuries sustained by hiTit 26.08.2004 mvolving truck N( No,2 and drivcn by respondenl Learaed counsel for fh^ accident, the appeBant suffer^d whacfa tiauinatic amputation oeewaed. The injuiy was certificate of Ex.P-18 wbieh (A.W.-2). However thc tribun^l towards loss of eaming capa( 10,000/- towards inedical expjf aad sufifering to fhe appeUant.| On fhe other hand subinitted that fhe reasoning coiapensation for loss of earEJiag appeUant has not examuie<f performed sui^ery over his thi|imb I- as couipensation to fhe appeBaut for A in the inotor vehicle accident daled (. CG 05 A.0138 owned by respondent No. 1 and insured by respondent No.3. i^ appellant subinits fhat in the said pennanent disabiUty as a result of |of fhe distal phalaax of right fhumb. (luly proved by adducing disabflity proved by Dr. Vinod Kumar Paadey has not awarded any conipensatfon tily aad simpiy awarded a suin of Rs. (enses and Rs. 15,000/- towards pains Froin perusal of fhe proved by Dr. Viuod Kuma): amputetion offh.e distal pIiaiJE fhe appeUaat who is a driver <tii<<Ici<Ili imcif'^fe1^ <r«l<^l< ^? srfigT sn^r saracd counsel for fhe respondent ssigaed by the tnbunal in not aUowuig capacity M just and proper as the the doctor who has treated aad I have heaid leamed c<|iunsel for the parties aad perused the iinpugned award. dcxtument ofEx.P-18 which h^ been duly Paadey, it is found fhat tra.umatic of r^ht thuiab was performed and I^ad tost fhe vital oi^an i.e. thuinb ia the iliailaax XI-HC-22 311^1 ^iT R-ii'* 31)^1 s-h^Ich yf?a ^'3 -ilWld'4, »ii1«'ic.(siwi'yy sn^?T iRra? ^ IIICTI sniich """"""'g^ 200 'fq^ST' 3I1^!I'?RIWBft(T -?5 Rs said accident. Therefore, taking of fhe Workinen Coiupensation loss of tenninal phalanx of eaming capacity, I assess fhe 20%. Though fhe appeUant ha) 3,000/- per inonfh as salaiy bu|i appeUant before the tnbunal to fhe notional iucome of the appe]: of annual eaming capacity at appeUant as 36 & applying ttt eaming is assessed at Rs. 4^ 32,000/- is awarded towards Accordiagly fhe total suin of additional sum ofRs. 55,000/- The respondent/Insura4. additional amount of conipens^ before fhe Coiamissioner, Worlc disbiu-sed to the Woilanan. thlumb lo&s qillld'll'l HI*1CTI ^ 'fS^& <faf*i±l< ^? 3lf:gH 3D^T tosistance froni Part-11 of Scliedule 1 4ct, 1923 wherein under entiy No.IO rcsiilts in 20% of ttie loss of of eanung capacity of appeUaat at clauaed that he was eamiag Rs. ]|t no document has been filed by the t>rove the same. Therefore, assessing, ;flaat at Rs. 15000/- pcr anniim, loss i. 3,000/- & considering the age of inultiplier of 16 the total loss of S,000/- and further a sum of Rs. [•eatinent and pains and sufiferings. ps. 80,000/- is awarded and thus awarded to fhe appellant. ;e Company shall deposit the ition wifhia two inonths fix>m. today |anen Coiapensation, which shaU be Sdi- Dhirendra Mishra Judge