^^,>2Sii(?££?^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION {Art. 2271 N0. 4289 OF 2010 PBTITIONERS (Decree holders) 1. 2. 3. 4. VERSU8 RBSPONDBNT AMRIT RAO THAKRE, aged about 47 yem's, S/o Late Baburao Thakre, KU. HEMLATA THAKRE, aged about 41 years, D/o Late Baburao Thafcre KU. LATA THAKRE, aged about 32 years, D/o Late Baburao Thakre SMT. MEENA GAYAKWAD, aged about 39 years, D/o Baburao Thakre, W/o Shri Dilip Gayakwad. AU R/o Sarkaada, BUaspur (C.G.). STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH: The District Education Officer, BUaspur, Distarict BHaspur (C.G.) (Not nientioned in fhe order sheet/particular), WRIT PETZTION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SNDIA. |SB sHon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Preseut:- Shri Gui-adev I. Sharao., Advocate for fhe petitioaers. Shri Rakesh Jha, Dy. G,A. for tlie State/respondent ORAL- ORDER (Passed on 20/08/2010) 1. Heard. 2. Order impugned dated 2/7/2010 passed by First Civil Judge Class-1, Bilaspur ia civU execution case No. 75-A/80 whereby appUcation uuder Section 151 of tlie Civil Procedure Code, 1908 filed on behalf of fhe petitioners for clami of mterest of 12% per annuni has been disraissed perused. 3, As per contention aad contents ofdecree whUe passing fhe decree Coiul below has not awarded aay iaterest fherefore Court below was justlfied ia disraissiag such appUcation which was beyond the scope of executive Court, I do not fmd aay itlegality m fhe order icapugned. Consequently, this petition is Uable to be dismissed aad is hereby dismissed. 4. No order as to costs. I T.P. Sharma Judge -17-