Kg HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON’%LE $HRI T.P. 3HARI‘v‘IA, J. Coram MAJC). (FRI No. 3692 OF 2007 APPELLANT Vinod Kumar Singh, S/o R.C. Singh, aged about 4O years, Anand Matador Transport and , Traveis Raiiway Fatak Ke Aage, a ‘ Petrol Pump Ke Baga! Main, Tifra, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG) Versus RESPONDENTS 1. Fagu Ram, Sio Dhan Sai Yadav, aged about 50 years. 2. Savitri Bai, W/o Fagu Ram, aged about 45 years. 3. Smt. Santoshi Bai, Wi'o Late Santosh Yadav. Ail resident of Kargi Road, Near Rest House, Kota, DEstrict Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Branch Manager; United India Insurance Company Limited, Bilaspur (CG). MEMORANDUM OF MISC APPEAL UN$ER SECTION 30 OF WORKIVIEN COMPENSATION‘ ACT Present: Shri Sushobit Singh, learned counsel for the appeliant. ORDER mm March, zoos; rThe’ foiiowingorder of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J‘ : Shri Shushobit Singh, iearned counsei for the appellant, in View of ihe faci that the appellant is not responding to his communication for sending e deposit receipt, seeks permission th to withdraw the appeal iiied by the appellant under Section 3Q of 3Q L i W @ the Workmen Compensation Act, against the impugned award dated 05.09.200?, passed by the Commissioner forAWorkmen Compensation / Labour Court, Biiaspur in Case No. 62/WCA/MCCXO6, with the iiberty of filing another appeal as and when the deposit receipt is made avaiiabie by the appeiiant. ‘ 2. Permission granted. ‘3‘ With the above iiberty, the appeai is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. ‘ Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the subbu impugned award to teamed counsel for the appeiiant immediateiy /i /. Sd/— Sd/- Chief Justice ‘T.P.Sharma Judge