:1: :1: :1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1218 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s Orders Orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.S.P.Srivastava, Adv. for the petitioners. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 25TH FEBRUARY,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, an inter-locutory order of the competent Authority under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act for dealing with cases of eviction of licensees from the licensed premises has been challenged. 2. The said inter-locutory order has not been interfered with by the Revisional Authority. The Revisional Authority has observed, and in my opinion rightly, that the :2: :2: :2: matters are not concluded. If the Competent Authority passes an adverse order to the petitioner, then, a Revision is also available to challenge that adverse order. During the course of such challenge, the Revisonal Authority has permitted the petitioner to raise all pleas. In such circumstances, I am of the opinion that interference at this stage would only frustrate and defeat the mechanism provided for expeditious disposal of proceedings between the Licensor and Licensee. Petition dismissed. No costs. sd/- *******