FARHAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO. 1259 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6395 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mrs. C.P. Kutti, Advocate for appellant. CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 1st July, 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant/ acquiring body. The acquiring body feels aggrieved by the enhancement in respect of land reference. Having gone through the order, I find that the learned Reference Judge has virtually doubled the compensation from the one granted by SLAO in award. However, the peculiar aspect in this land reference is the property acquired is 0.41 R. Consequently, I do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order as the compensation in the light of the acquisition of the property, being of trivial nature, should not foreclose the rights accrued to the land holders. It is clarified that dismissal of the appeal of the acquiring body need not be treated as precedent for strcking the claim in equally placed other matters from the same order/ award. Appeal is dismissed. 2 2. In view of dismissal of appeal, the civil application does not survive and disposed of. [ K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. ] ssc/fa1259.09