// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT PRINCIPAL SEAT, JODHPUR ORDER In S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Appl. No.4262/2009 {Shanta Devi and Sharda Vs. State of Rajasthan} Date of Order ::: 12th August, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Shri Dilip Singh Udawat, Counsel for petitioners Shri Ashok Prajapat, PP for the State #### By the Court: Heard learned counsel for petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material/case diary made available to me during the arguments of the case. Learned counsel for petitioners contended that as per allegations in the F.I.R. the sharp-edged weapons were with co-accused- persons, namely, Ashok, Suresh and Chhagan Lal; so far as present petitioners are concerned, they are ladies and were having only blunt object, therefore, their case is distinguishable from the case of co-accused- persons, namely, Ashok, Suresh and Chhagan Lal, therefore, indulgence of bail may be granted to them under Section 438, Cr.P.C. // 2 // The above facts have not been disputed by learned Public Prosecutor on the basis of the first information report referred during the course of arguments. Taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I allow this bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Therefore, the S.H.O./I.O. of the Bagdi Nagar Police Station, District Pali, is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners, namely, (1) Shanta Devi W/o Chhagan Lal and (2) Sharda W/o Suresh, Both Residents of Adio (Amaji) Ka Badiya, Bada Guda, Tehsil Sojat, District Pali, in FIR No.98/2009 registered under Sections 143, 452 and 323 of the IPC, he shall enlarge them on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i) They shall make themselves available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii)They shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person // 3 // acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police officer; (iii)They shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. //Jaiman//