IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 21ST KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 32393 of 2009(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. PRASANTH.T.G,S/O.GANGADHARAN, THAIPARAMBATH HOUSE,KODUNGALLOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. SAJEESH,S/O.SASIDHARAN,EZHUVATHRA HOUSE, AREEPPALAM.PO,THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. MIDHUN NARAYANAN,S/O.NARAYANAN, OORAPRA HOUSE,PARAMBAYAM, NEDUMBASSERY.PO,ALUVA. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.ANIL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,REP;BY ITS VICE CHANCELLOR, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV.SRI.T.A.SHAJI, STANDING COUNSEL FOR MG UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J ------------------- W.P.(C).32393/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 12th day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioners appeared for the eighth semester B.Tech Degree examination conducted by the Mahatma Gandhi University in April-May 2009. The results were published in August 2009. The petitioners failed in the paper “Artificial Intelligence”. They have therefore applied for revaluation and scrutiny of their answer scripts by submitting Exts.P1, P1(A), P2, P2(A), P3 and P3(A) applications, all dated 31.8.2009. It is stated that requisite fee has also been paid. The petitioners submit that they had done well in the examination and are sure to secure a pass, if their answer scripts are revalued. It is also stated that they have passed all the other semester examinations and that unless their answer scripts are expeditiously revalued, they will be put to serious prejudice. 2. Sri.T.A.Shaji the learned standing counsel appearing for the Mahatma Gandhi University submits that if the applications for revaluation are in order and the requisite fee has been paid, the University will take steps to revalue the petitioners' answer scripts expeditiously. As regards W.P.(C).32393/09 2 scrutiny, he submits that scrutiny can be arranged within ten days. In the light of the said submission, I dispose of this writ petition with the following directions. The Controller of Examinations shall within ten days from the date on which the petitioners produce a certified copy of this judgment before him make arrangements for scrutiny of the petitioners' answer scripts described in Exts.P1(A), P2(A) and P3(A) applications. The Controller of Examinations shall also take expeditious steps to have the petitioners' answer scripts described in Exts.P1, P2 and P3 applications revalued and communicate the results to them by 15.12.2009. P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge mrcs