IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.3252 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: December 15, 2009. Reena ...Appellant(s) v. Kulwinder Singh & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri Nonish Kumar, Advocate, for Shri Munish Mittal, Advocate, for the appellant. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): This is claimant's appeal for enhancement of compensation. Along with this appeal, no certified copy of the impugned award has been attached. Instead, an application was filed for granting exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned award. On October 9, 2009, none appeared on behalf of the applicant- appellant, however, in the interest of justice, the case was adjourned to November 5, 2009. On November 5, 2009 again, none was present on behalf of the appellant and the application filed by the appellant for granting exemption from filing certified copy of the judgment was rejected and the appeal was ordered to be listed for 15.12.2009 for further consideration. Certified copy of the impugned order has not been placed on record even during the interregnum. Thus, there is no properly constituted appeal before this Court as provided under Order 41 Rule 1 CPC. In these circumstances, I have no option but to dismiss this appeal being not properly constituted. Dismissed. December 15, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge