L.3?^'t.a /B,?^fl 5?*iT' .''*';% .•?nU-LJ A'T~T~TCi'n' ..^"^a^i 115*T1 -^ ,m' U&M fcUURI y t.MHifti J1&&ARM, BiLA&"UR lhnl ^siu'^wi!--'.^ Km 1^^ ^ ^'Hn^ •iVif, 3^i%:? jiSijV? 3 ^'^iSrf'. <n.iit3?-!? Vt £»ii,>?'«'^- PE 11 TIONER: D.F'. So.raf. S/o Khstanond Saraf, aqed 50 yea-s., R/o Qua.No.E-22, 15 Biock, S-E.C.L. Color.y, Korba, C.Q. Versus RESPON&ENT; Bharat Petroieum Corporotion Limited, L-6, Bharat Bha'/an, Bellard Estate, Karim Bhai Road, Mumbai, Through Chcirman, 8herat . Petroleum Corporation Limited. (Appiication Linder Section 115 o'f the Code of Civil Procedure} Present: Petitioner in person. AAr'. T.P. ShamiQ, J ORDER (18-2-2009) 1. Heard'. 2. The petitioner submits that decres for pQssession of iand along with money has been Dassed bv' this Couri- in Second Ao&eal No.16/2006. Only on the requsst of the respondent tims fer compiiance of decree was extended tiii 31-8-2008, but tlii today decree 'nas not been complied by' the responde.nt. Ths petitioner further subrnits that he is contestsng the ca.se personcliy, the decree be executed against ths respondent and possesswn be handed over to him. The petitioner a!so submits that he wil! fi!e suitable process for reaiizatjon of th&decreta! amount. The petitioner seeks to file appropriate ^ process before the Court beiow for' execution of the decree of possession a"'>c! clso the decreta! amount. With this iiberry he seeks to withdraw this revision. 3. The revision is ciisrnissed as withdrswn with aforesaid iiberty. The trial Court i.e. the 4 CivH Judge Ciass-I, BiSaspur, is directed to issue warrant of possessioh a warrant for.realization of th.e decretai amount ond execute the decree, in accordance with iew, on filina of process fees by the petitioner wlthin 20 doys from today. 4. A copy of this order be sent to the concerned Cour't. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge •M-'<