IH ^iE^MitDHa PKA3SSK snTS ADMINISTKATIW m2;IBLT3AZ, P;tI?iCIPAL E3NCH AT JABAI,?UR(".P.l t^A.HO.i ' \ll QF 1995 } ,yff\ \c\^»,^ l^fi) i o T9 P.D.DI»A3,AGEB ABOUT £7 Z.;s.H3,S/0 smi B.D.MiittH, 0/0 SuPST.SNGla3EK,HA.NIKRI KASD30 OiaCtS,3IL&SPUa, DIST'tIS'Ti^ITASPUKd^J?.) . . . .APFIiICAtiT l)S?ji.TB OF KADH7A. PHAOBS4 THSiOUGHs SECR3TA.KT, ISRIQaTIO;? D3N.HTK3NT, n LUS H B a ;an," HOPA L , B HOPA t{M.P.). 2 }S UPSHItTCENDENTj.NGia'BSR. mainRi asDEO c-raoit DT3TT; BIUSPUR(M.?.} •Sj^ ^ S)E;XSCUTIT@ TSQlT.Sii Kia.KAaO IKKIGATI03 DEFTT DIST?: 3lIASPUR(H.P.). 9*9* 3S.SU BBSPOriDEHrS D3TAILS QF &?PLICA?ION PA.HTT^;"'A"?! n1?-^^.E- n Q3-T" • n"^——.- --L. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.1099 of 2005 PETITIONER P. D. Dhwan Versus RESPONDENTS State of Madhya Pradesh and others Sinale Bench: Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Present: - None for the petitioner. Shri A^V. Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for fhe State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 06 day of November, 2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. On boft occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. (2) In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed Torwant of prosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner forthwith. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge jTiane