^- li: i: Jiad admitted of sexual relationship wi+h Dogaram. Therefore, the report of the F.S.L. did not by itself establish the guilt of the appellant under Section 376(2)(g) beyond doubt. For the gforesaid reasons, the appellant is, in my consideFed opinion, entitled to benefit of doubt. ; '' :: ; ^ • • • : -' ' i: 17. In the? result, this appeal is allowed and the conviction o'f the e^pellcmt undei^ Section 376(2)(g) aml 323 read with Seeti^ ^::.'iw''::;1 ., '.:: ...' ..^ '••'';''' .- l' , ::'' ' ^•' ISiJ i ^ the I.P.C. anclil-he ^ntence ywarcled •I'hereurider are set asicfe.i l rThe appeliant is aequitted orid shttll^be sef at liber'ty forrtiwith, if not required in dny other case. Fine, if paid, shalll be refunded toi|the appellant. Sdf- DilipRaosahebDeshmukh Judge