1 S. B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.538/2006 MOHAN LAL V. R.S.R.T.C. & ANOTHER. DATE OF ORDER :::: 27/02/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI Mr.Bheem Kant Vyas, for Petitioner. Mr.M.S.Godara for Mr.V.K.Mathur, for Respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, due payment, as accrued to the petitioner, was made, but, then the claim of the late payment remains. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that petitioner was given voluntary retirement under the Scheme, but at that time, the Corporation was not knowing that the petitioner remained behind the bar, hence in view of the above, the petitioner was not even entitled for the benefit of the Scheme of voluntary retirement. It was further submitted that even after issuance of the order of retirement, dated 18.01.2005, last due payment accrued to the petitioner was made, after completion of necessary formalities by 20th April, 2005, therefore, there was no delay in making the payments accrued to the petitioner on 2 retirement. Since satisfactory explanation has been given by the respondents on the issue raised by the petitioner for pursuing this writ petition, I do not find any ground or justification for grant of benefit of interest, because after completing necessary formalities, due payments of retirement were made to the petitioner almost within a period of four months, inasmuch as, last payment was made to the petitioner on 20th April, 2005. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. (M.N. BHANDARI), J. scd