IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1817 OF 2001 Sevagiri Shikshan Sanstha, Bhosari, Pune & Ors. .... Petitioners V/s. Rajendra D. Gundil & Ors. ...... Respondents Mr.S.J.Rairkar, Advocate, for the Petitioners Mr.A.M.Joshi, Advocate, for Respondent No.1. Mr.Rakesh S. Patil, i/b Deepak R. More, Advocate, for Respondent No.2. Mr.A.I.Patel, AGP, for respondent No.3. CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. DATED : AUGUST 04, 2008. P.C. 1. By filing this petition, the petitioners have challenged the judgment and order dated 28-02-2000 passed by the Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Pune, in Appeal No.92 of 1996. The said appeal was filed by respondent No.1 herein. The Tribunal allowed the appeal and passed an order of reinstatement in favour of respondent No.1. 2. At the time of admitting this petition on 02-04-2001, this Court found that so far as order of reinstatement is concerned, the same has already been complied with and the respondent No.1 is in employment. The Court therefore, rejected the prayer for interim relief. The Court also granted liberty to the petitioner to take out appropriate proceedings for reimbursement of back wages with respondent No.2. 3. Today at the time of hearing, the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner has submitted that he has received a letter from the petitioner No.2 pointing out that now there is no dispute which is required to be decided in the present proceedings. The learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that thereafter, he has sent various letters to the petitioner-management, but he has not received any reply. It is submitted by him that he is not in a position to argue this matter as he has not received any instructions from the petitioner-management. The letter dated 13-11-2006 is taken on record and marked as Exh.1. 4. Since the learned Advocate for the petitioners submitted that he has no instructions to proceed with the matter and is not in a position to argue this matter, he prayed that this Court may dispose of the petition accordingly. 5. In view of what is stated hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. Rule discharged. ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )