IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 30TH JUNE 2011 / 9TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 17676 of 2011(H) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ K.R.BAIJU, FATHIMA MANZHIL, POWER HOUSE WARD, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADVS. SRI.SIBY MATHEW SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU SRI.B.PREMNATH RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, COMMISSIONERATE OF RURAL DEVELOPMNET, KERALA STATE RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, CSI BUILDING, PULIMOODE, TRIVANDRUM.PIN-695 001 2. THE EMPOWERED STANDING COMMITTEE, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, KERALA STATE RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, CSI BUILDING, PULIMOODE, TRIVANDRUM.PIN-695 001 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.17676/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 4/6/2007 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE GEOLOGIST. P2 COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 5/7/2007 ISSUED BY THE GEOLOGIST TO THE PETITIONER. P3 COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 14/5/2007 ISSUED BY THE R.D.O. TO THE PETITIONER. P4 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 22/3/2007 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR. P5 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 26/2/2007 IN WP(C)NO.5489/07 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. P6 COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. P7 COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 19/7/2010 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. P8 COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 10/2/2011 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE RESPONDENT. P9 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 28/2/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. P10 COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 26/2/2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J -------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.17676 OF 2011 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of June 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner is stated as aggrieved of Ext.P8 order passed by the 1st respondent, whereby the contract awarded to the petitioner was terminated for the reasons stated therein. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, being aggrieved of Ext.P8, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P10 Appeal, which is pending consideration before the 2nd respondent and that, the petitioner will be satisfied, if the 2nd respondent is directed to consider and pass final orders on Ext.P10 within the shortest possible time. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 4. After hearing both the sides, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider Ext.P10 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, of course after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 'six weeks' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 5. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the Writ Petition before the 2nd respondent W.P.(C) No.17676/2011 2 for taking further steps. The recovery proceedings, if any, pursuant to Ext.P8 shall be kept in abeyance till such time. The Writ Petition is disposed of. vdv P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE