IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6216 of 2009 SIMA KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 18.5.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. Normally when the Government would create a mode of ventilation of grievance, the authorities so authorized must do the needful to make the policy of the Government meaningful and successful. Here in this case, the State Government while issuing the guidelines in the year 2006 for appointment, selection and other conditional service of Angan Bari Sevika had made a provision under Clause 10 thereof that any decision for removal from service would be taken up by the Collector of the district and such a decision of the Collector of the District also would be the subject matter of an appeal before the Divisional Commissioner. The grievance of the petitioner in this regard is that though such an appeal has been preferred by the petitioner on 15.7.2008 vide Misc. Appeal No. 14/2008 before the Divisional Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa, the 2 same till date has not been disposed of. This Court instead of keeping the matter pending for ascertaining the reasons for not disposing the appeal would find it more expedient in the ends of justice to direct the said Divisional Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa (Respondent No.3) to ensure that the appeal after hearing the concerned person, Shiv Ragni Devi (Respondent No.6) as also the petitioner, be disposed of within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. It is, however, made clear that any further delay on the part of the Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa in disposing of the appeal will only make him accountable to explain in his order as to why the disposal of appeal could not be made by him in a period over one year but also liable to be proceeded for committing contempt of this Court. With the aforementioned observations/ direction, this application is disposed of. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)