IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Appeal No.403 of 2006 in Notice of Motion No 2700 of 2005 in Suit No.2467 of 2005 Rishikesh K Sharma ..Appellant vs Krishna Mishra and Ors. ..Respondents Mr. A.M.Saraogi i/b Bharat Vashinawa and Co for appellant Mr Raju Z. Moray for respondent No.1. Mr. L.A.Munin for respondent No.2 Mr. J.Pandhi i/b Ms S.I.Shah & Co for respondent No.3 CORAM: KSHITIJ R. VYAS, C.J., & ABHAY S. OKA,J. DATE: JULY 12, 2006. P.C.:- Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having gone through the reasoning given by the learned single Judge in the impugned order dated 27th April 2006, we see no merits in the appeal. Suffice it to say that we are in agreement with the reasoning given by the learned single Judge. At this stage the learned counsel for the appellant seeks extension of ad-interim order granted by the learned single Judge. The learned counsel for the respondents makes a statement that till 2nd August, 2006 the film in question will not be released. This statement will protect the interest of the appellant. Appeal as well as notice of motion stand disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA, J.