IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH MAY 2011 / 20TH VAISAKHA 1933 WP(C).No. 13295 of 2011(J) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. C.VIPIN, S/O. C.GOVINDANKUTTY, AGED 24 YEARS, RESIDING AT VRINDA, SASTHA NAGAR, ENGINEERING COLLEGE POST, AKATHETHARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. PRASANTH C.P., 18/692, SUNDRAN NAIR COLONY, KARALA STREET, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVESITY, CALICUT UNIVESITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVESITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVESITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673 635. R1 & R2 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI P.C. SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.K.MOHANAN,J. ----------------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.13295 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of May,2011 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioners is that though the petitioners had preferred an applications for re-valuation of their answer scripts of the 4th and 6th Semester Examination of B.Tech Automobile Engineering Degree course, the same have not been considered so far and no result is published. 2. The Ist petitioner applied for revaluation of the paper on EN 04 Engineering Mathematics IV of the 4th Semester examination vide Ext.P1 application and he also applied for revaluation of the paper in AM 04 606 (Finite element Method in the 6th Semester vide Ext.P2 application. 3. The 2nd petitioner preferred Ext.P3 application for revaluation of the paper on EN 04 401 (Engineering Mathematics IV of the 4th semester and he preferred Ext.P4 application for revaluation for the paper on AM 04 603 (Auto Electrical and Electronics) in the 6th Semester Examination. 4. Standing counsel for the respondents submitted that if the applications preferred by the petitioners are proper, the same can be directed to be disposed of within a reasonable time. 5. In the light of the above facts and circumstances involved in the case and in view of the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to revalue the papers of the petitioners as requested by them if the said applications are otherwise in order and publish the result within ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment which will be produced by the petitioners. The writ petition is disposed of as above. V.K.MOHANAN, Judge. kvm/-