^^& 'fc;, -i%,. I?1 VSsiS3^. ^ ^^^-^tA^ ^.'lir^ '^-•^'^' 'K^s''^.?"y''' ni.^ y Petifloner COURT OF CHHATTISG^RH:_3Si-ASPyR Writ (Cl No. 832 of20S9 ihisham Chandravanshi, S/o. Shri Dhan Singh, aged a&out 38 yers, r/o. vlllage Jangaipur, Post — Ruse, Tahsi! - Pandariya, District - Karbircfham (CG). Versus issoonaents z. State of Chhsttisgarh, through the Secretar/, Department of Panchayat, Bilaspur (CG). The Additionai Coliector, Kabirdham. Distt. Kablrdham (CG). The Sub Divisionai Officer (Reveriue)/ Prescribed Authority, Pandariya, District Kabirdham (CG). (Writ Petition under Articte 226/227 of Constituiion of indiai SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satlsh K. Aanihotrl, J. Present: Mr. Sunii Ofevani, counsel for the pectioner. Mr. Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate Gsnera! for the Stats. ORAL R3H (Passed on this 9s" day of February, 2009) Learned counse! apoearina for the Detitioner submits that under Drovlso to Section 40 (15 (c) of the Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhlniyafn,1S93, the application has to be decided within 90 days from the date of issue of show cause notice to ihe concerned office 'oeare'. The matter was remitted back to the Sub Divisiona! Officer, Pandarlva, Distt. Kabirdham, on 12-9-2008 i'Annexu:'e P/4'). Since then the matter is oending consideration and no action has been taken til! date. !t is further submltted that the Sub Divisiona! Officer is bound to consider the matier and pass appropriate order within 90 days from the date of issue ofshow cause notice. Since needful has not been done, thus, this petition bsfore this Court. 2) Be that as it may, ! have perused the provisions of iaw. Accordlngiy, it is directed that the Sub Divisional Officer, Pandariya, Distt. Kabirdham.'respondent No.3 to consider and decide the appiica'aon on ifrs own merits, in accordance with.iaVt', as ear!y as possibie, preferabiy vi/ithin a perioa of four weeks from ths date of receiot of a CODV ofthls order. 3) Inviev/oftheforegoing, this petition isdisposed of. __..——-' Sd/- Satteh^Af Judge ihotri