IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2092 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2092 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2092 OF 2008 Mr.Shabbir Ahmed Abubaker Shaikh. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. K.S.Patil for the applicant. Ms.P.P.Shinde, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 2nd July 2008. DATED: 2nd July 2008. DATED: 2nd July 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This application is under section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The applicant is apprehending his arrest in C.R.No.30/2005 registered with Economic Offence Wing Unit-4, Mumbai for the offences punishable under sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 420 read with section 34 of Indian Penal Code and sections 10 and 24 of the Indian Immigration Act on the basis of the complaint filed by one Babajaan Yusuf Shaikh. 3. The applicant has invoked jurisdiction of this Court after having suffered adverse order dated 20th May, 2008 passed by learned Asst.Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay; wherein the learned Sessions Judge while refusing anticipatory bail to the applicant has observed as under:- "4. In addition to the above, on 3/5/2008 Applicant was directed to remain present and the matter was adjourned to 9/5/2008. On that day, exemption from appearing was sought and matter was adjourned to 16/5/2008 and on 16/5/2008 also the Applicant was not present and the matter was adjourned today and even today the Applicant, inspite of specific directions is not present." 4. Looking to the conduct of the applicant, it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant. The application is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE