{1} D.B. CW(Parole) No. 9785/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. Civil Writ Petition(Parole) No. 9785/2010 Chandan Singh Versus The State of Rajasthan & Others. DATE OF ORDER: 11.08.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENA V. GOMBER Mr. Nawab Ali Rathore, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Yadav, Government Advocate, for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The convict petitioner has preferred this parole writ petition for grant of second parole of 30 days. 3. Learned Government Advocate contended that parole application of the petitioner was rejected on the basis of adverse report given by Social Welfare Officer. So far as report of Superintendent of Police is concerned, the same was not against the petitioner. As per Nominal Roll, the conduct of the petitioner in Jail is satisfactory. 4. We have considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties. {2} D.B. CW(Parole) No. 9785/2010 5. Learned Government Advocate admits that conduct of the petitioner in Jail custody as well as during first parole period was satisfactory. 6. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, we are inclined to allow this writ petition and the same is hereby allowed. 7. It is directed that the petitioner Chandan Singh S/o. Shri Parsuram by Caste Banjara, R/o. Village Maharaj Kanwarpura, Police Station Ghad, District Tonk be released on second parole of 30 days on furnishing his personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousands) with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousands) each to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent. It will be open for the concerned Jail Superintendent to impose any other condition to secure the presence of the petitioner. 8. A copy of this order may be sent for information to convict-petitioner and to concerned Jail Superintendent for compliance. (MEENA V. GOMBER),J. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. Manoj Item No.11.