,T/' \^ RT Review Petitton No.9 of 2010 PETITSONERS: 2. 3. s. 9. 12. Anil Shukia. aaed about 45 vears, S/o Shri S.P. Shukia, Head Master, Government Prs-Middle Schoot, Takiyapara, District Durg (CG) & Ors S.S. Bargoti, agsd about 61 years, s/o Sate Shri Matook Sirigh, R/o i.T.i Campus, Koni, Biiaspur (CG) Dr. H.C. Yadav,. aged about 60 years, s,'o Ramagya Yadav, R/o Taiapara, Siiaspur (CG) Virendra Pa! Singh, aged about 59 years, S/o Lats Shri Surajniai, H.M. GOV. Middie School, Amarpur, Pendra, District Bilaspur (CG) Dr. Santosh Tiwari, aged about 48 years, S/o Shri J.N. Tiwari, R/o Y'adunandan Nagar, Biiaspur (CG) Mahesh Verma, aged about 47 years, s/o Shri Shripat Verma, H.M. GOV. Pre-Middle Schooi, Gunderdehi, District Durg (CG) R.K. Dv/ivedi, aged about 45 years, S/o Shri R.K. Dwivedi, H.K/1. Govt. Pre- Middie School, Baghera, District Durg (CG) G.S. Thakur, aged about 58 years, s/'o Shri A.S. Thakur, H.M. Govt. Pre- Schooi, Sikosa, District Durg Ramnarayan Ram, Aged About 48 Years, S/o Shri Ram, H.iVI. Govt. Prs- Middie Schooi, Thanaud, District Dur{ (CG) D.R. Sahu, aged about 57 years, s/o Shri R.P. Sahu, H.W. Govt. Girts Pre- Middle School, District Durg (CG) Abhimanyu Chauhan, aged about 46 years, s/o Shri Doman Chauhan, H.M. Govt. Pre-Middle Schooi, Bhatgaon, District Durg (CG) Anii Singh, aged about 45 years, S/o Shri V.D. Slngh, H.M. Govt. Pre- Middle Sehool, Dandesara, District Durg (CG) —s'- -'^ ::^.^^^&^-^^'•'^^^^-- 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21 22. 23, 24. Ajay Chandrakar, aged about 48 years, s/o Shri Parmanand Chandrakar, H.M. Govt. Pre-Middte Schooi, Dandesara, District Durg (CG) J.K. Shukla, aged about 40 years, S/o Shri C.P. Shukia, H.M. Govt. Pre- Middie Sc'nool, Faridnagar, District Durg (CG) G.P. Singh, aged about 43 years, S/o LaSs Shri B.L. Singh, H.M. Govt. Pre- Middte School, Katro, District Durg (CG) A.K. Gupta, aged about 43 years, S/o Shri G.C. Gupta, H.M. Govt. Pre- Middie School, Khedamara, District Durg (CG) Ku. Anupa Gayakwad, aged about 47 years, D/o Shri B.H. Gayakwad, HM. Govt. Pre-Middie Schoo!, Basin, District Durg (CG) S.C. Nayak, aged about 48 years, S/o Shri Shridhar Nayak, H.M. Govt. H.S. Thodiya, Durg (CG) Tu'aram Chandrakar, aged about 40 years, S/Q Shri B.L. Chandrakar, H.M. Govt. Navin, Pre-Middle Schooi, Durg (CG) ju Gupta, aged about 46 years, w/o Shri Abhay Gupta, H.M. Go\it. Pre- Middle Schooi, Katulbod, District Durg (CG) Smt- Pushpa Joshl, aged about years, W/o Shri R.K. Joshi, H.M. Govt. Pre-Middle School, Model Town, Bhiiai, District Durg (CG) Ku. Manju Lakra, aged about40years, D/o Shri S. Lakrs, H.M. Govt. Prs- Middte Schooi, Titurdih, District Durc (GG) Arjun Prasad Ray, aged about 51 years, S/o Shri Prasad Ray, H.K4. Govt. Girls Pre-Middie Schooi, Supeia, District Durg (C-G) Sangeeta Anand, aged about 41 years, w/o Shri A.K. Anand, H.M. Govt. Middie Schoo!, Devdera, District Durg (CG) .--^..£ :T3!?SJ°^S: ^^^^,^^ .A.-. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31 32. 33. 35. Dhananjay Verma, aged about 43 years, s/o Shri N.K. Verm, H.M. upgradecs Govt. Pre-Middle School, Shivpuri, Jamul, District Durg (CG) Smt. R.K. Chita, aged about 40 years, w/o Shri M.S. Chita, H.M. Govt. Glris Pre-Middle School, Utai, District Durg (CG) H.S. Tomar, aged about 44 years, s/o Shri D.S. Tomar, H.M. Govt. Pre- Middle School, Vorigarika, District Durg(CG) U.K. Cnandrakara, aged about 50 years, s/o iVI.L. Chandrakar, H.?»1. Govt. Pre-iViiddle School, Machandar, District Durg (CG) S.A. Narang, aged about 39 years, s/o Shri K.L. Narang, H.iVI. Govt. Pre- Middle Schooi, Khopli, District Durg (CG) Smt. Sharda Verma, aged ab< years, w/o Shri T.S. Verr Govt. Pre-Middle Schoq^Sector-9, ihitei, District Durg (C< 'ndrajeet Bhoi, aged about 43 years, w/o Shri Jagjeet Singh Bhoi, H.M. Govt. Pre-Middie School, Keiabadi, District Durg (CG) Rajiv Kumar Sharma, aged about 47 yesrs, S/o D.N. Sharma, H.M. Govt. Giris Pre-Middie School, Sargaon, District Biiaspur (CG) Shri Shirish Kumar Pandey, aged about 47 years, S/o Shri S.P. Pandey, H.M. Govt. Middie School, Karkena, District Bilaspur (CG) Surendra Singh Baghei, aged about 47 years, S/o Shri S.P. Baghei, H.M. Govt. Middle School, Biiaspur (CG) Ravi Pradhan, aged about 43 years, S/o Shri Late K. Pradhan, H.M. Govt. Pre-Middle Schooi, Subhash Nagar, Bhiiai, District Durg (CG) Versus RESPONDENTS: State of Chhattlsgarh, Through the Secretary', Schooi Education Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) •Sf r %°E3a>!>-.. "y^"\ ^ft _ 1% •ft. %.,_,<"i £' ^lf 2. Director. Directorate Public instruction Pension Bada, Raipur (CG) 3. Chhattisgarh Pubifo Sen/ice Commission, Through the Secretary Shankar Nagar, Raipur (CG) Dsv!sion_Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dhirendra MishraA Hon'ble Shrl R.N. Chandratar. JJ_. LoSL- 1. By this petition, th®petstioners have prayed for review/reca!! of the ordsr dated 29 July, 2009 passed in WP(S) No.6046 of 2008 (Mohan Lal Patel and others Versus State of Chhattisgarh and another and oiher connected writ petitions) whereby the ititioners' chaiienge to the constitutiona! vaiidity of RuSe 6 and Scheduie-11 of the Chhattisgarh Schoo! Education Gazetted Service (School Levei Service) Recruitment and Promotion Ruies; 2Q08 as amended on 27 Novembsr, 2008 was rejected. 2. The scope of interference in review petition is well settied. The parameters are prescribed in Order 47 CPC. The petitioners pray for review on account of mistake or error apparent on the face of record. iyiistake or error apparent signifies an error which ss evldent per se from the record of the cas.e and does not require detalled examination, scrutiny and eiucidation either of the facts or the iegal position. If an error is not self-evident and detection thereof requires iong debate and process of reasoning, it cannot be treated as an error apparent on the face of the record for the purpose of Order 47 Ruie 1 CPC {Reliance is piaced in State of West Benga! and others Versus Kamal Sengupta and another, [(2008) 8 Supreme Court Cases 312]. 3 Perused the grounds taken by the petitioners in the petition for review. 4. The order under review has been passed after elaborately considering the arguments advanced by the respective parties and in view of the above settled 3: ^- \-:'^^^»^ „" .^^SE^-''^-^;.^1.., .. ^^' Sao/e m pos'tlon of law, no ground for review is avaiiable to the petitioners against the Impugned order. 5. The petition is without any substance, the same deserves to be and is hereby dismlssed. ' — Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Sd/- R.N.Charidraka;• 'e ssn: •^>^~,