IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3877 of 2008 SURESH RAO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 30.4.2010. After having heard Sri Pathak Dhananjay Kr., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also heard the learned A.P.P. for the State, I do not find that the proceeding could be quashed. What I direct the court below is to consult the provisions of enactment under which the accused persons have been summoned and to go to the penal provisions of those enactments and to frame charges against the accused under the appropriate provisions of law, even the provision which is the definition provision of the act has been indicated in the order of cognizance. This shows rather a pathetic approach of the magistracy towards as serious an act on the judicial side of the court as passing an order of summoning. The petition is dismissed with the above observations. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )