1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA. C.W.P No. 2885 of 2010-C Date of Decision: 26.12.2011 Shri. Surjit Singh Rana, S/O Shri. Raghubir Singh, Resident of village Chhal Bhula, Post office Jhanjara, Tehsil & District Hamirpur, H.P. .. Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Himachal Pradesh, through secretary (Cooperation) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla 171002. 2. Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-17109. 3. Shri.Dile Ram Dhiman, Assistant Registrar Cooperative Societies Hamirpur, District Hamirpur, H.P. 4. The Jhaniara Agriculture Cooperative Society Ltd. Jhaniara, Post Office Jhaniara, District Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh, through its President. ..Respondents. Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy.A.G with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy.A.G.for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. S.D Vasudeva, Advocate, for respondent NO.4. Sanjay Karol, J (oral) My attention has been invited to the affidavit dated 5.11.2011 filed by Sh. R.D Nazeem, Registrar Cooperative Societies, H.P. It is quite apparent that inquiry report has now been submitted 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 before the Assistant Registrar (Cooperative Societies) Hamirpur for further action. Further Mr. Ajay Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner has also invited my attention to another communication dated 4.2.2011, copy of which is taken on record. Evidently, this also pertains to the audit report of the concerned organization i.e.Jhaniara C.A.S. In view of the intervening developments which have now taken place, petition can be disposed of with a direction to respondent NO. 2 to take appropriate action in accordance with law, on the report now submitted before appropriate authority(s). Needful shall positively be done, after fully comply with Principles of natural justice, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified coy of this judgment. 2. The petition stands disposed of , however there is further direction to respondent No.2 to file an affidavit in compliance within a period of one month thereafter. Copy Dasti. December 26,2011 (Sanjay Karol),Judge. (Priti)