IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 12822 of 2004 Between: Gone Prakash Rao, s/o G.Chalapathi Rao, r/o 43/A, Old M.L.A.Quarters, Hyderguda, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Higher Education, rep., by its Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner, Technical Education-cum-Convener EAMCET-2004-05, BRKR Bhavan, Tank Bund, Hyderabad, A.P., 3 The All India Council for Technical Education, (A statutory body of the Government of India), rep., by its Chairman, Indira Gandhi Sports Complex, I.P.Estate, New Delhi. 4 The Takshasila Educational Society, H.No.7-2-40, Mankammathota, Karimnagar-505 001 rep., by its Secretary and Correspondent. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction one in the nature of mandamus declaring action of the 1st respondent in granting NOC and subsequent approval granted by the 3rd respondent in favour of the 4th respondent to establish Sri Chaitanya College of Engineering, Thimmapur, Karimnagar, for the academic year 2004-05 as contrary to the Regulations, Norms prescribed by the AICTE, the 3rd respondent herein and consequently direct the 2nd respondent not to allot students to the 4th respondent college. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.V.MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3.: GP FOR EDUCATION Counsel for the respondent No.4: Mr.S.Satyanarayana Prasad. The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: (Per Hon’ble the Chief Justice): We are not inclined to entertain such a writ petition as public interest litigation where the petitioner without approaching the third respondent and giving sufficient time to consider the petitioner’s representation has approached this Court. With leave and liberty granted to the petitioner to approach third respondent, this petition is dismissed. No costs. _________________________ DEVINDER GUPTA, C.J. _________________ C.V. RAMULU, J. Dated: 22-7-2004 Kvrk To 1 The Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Higher Education, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner, Technical Education-cum-Convenor EAMCET-2004-05, BRKR Bhavan, Tank Bund, Hyderabad, A.P., 3 The Chairman, All India Council for Technical Education, (A statutory body of the Government of India), Indira Gandhi Sports Complex, I.P. Estate, New Delhi. 4. Two CCs to G.P. for Higher Education, High Court of AP., Hyd.(OUT) 5. Two CD copies.