mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2667 OF 2008 Nivrutti Kashinath Kokare .. Petitioner versus Govind Damodar Deshpande .. Respondent ... None present for the petitioner. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 14th July 2008 P.C.: 1. None present for the petitioner. Dismissed for non prosecution. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J) Later on Later on Later on 2. Advocate for the petitioner mentioned the matter that at the relevant time he was busy in another court. For sufficient cause, petition is restored to file to its original number and proceed with the petition. 3. Heard counsel for the parties. 4. I see no reason to depart from the view taken by the court below at this interlocutory stage. The view so taken is a possible view. Hence, no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is warranted. Hence, petition is dismissed. 5. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner prays that atleast the suit be expedited. That request be made before the trial court who in turn will consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)