IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8413 of 1997 HARDWAR SINGH, S/o Sri Bindhyachal Singh of Village Gangpur Siswan, P.S. Siswasn, District Siwan, at present Head master (incharge) Singhashani Devi Project Girls High School, Siswan, District Siwan. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR, through the Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, New Secretariat, Vikas Bhawan, Patna. 2.The Additional Commissioner and Special Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, New Secretariat, Vikas Bhawan, Patna. 3.The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Human Resources Development Department, New Secretariat, Vikas Bhawan Patna. 4.The District Education Officer, Siwan. ----------- 5 22.7.2010 No one appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the State is present. Prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows:- “That the present application is being filed for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ/ writs or direction for quashing of the order dated 29.3.97 passed by the respondent director where under the respondents though have accepted the school to be a project school under the Project Scheme, but refuse to recognize the services of the founder teaching and not teaching staffs of the school on two grounds: (A)Appointment of the Teachers of those Schools shall be made by the School Service Commission (Vidyalaya Seva Board). (B)There is no extension of budget for the payment of salary to the staffs of such Schools which have been taken under the project Scheme under in 1988-89 (third Phase). And further for the issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus to recognize the services of teaching and non teaching staff of the said School with effect from 1.1.1989, pay their salary in accordance with the provisions of the circulars.” On a perusal of the materials on record and specially 2 the impugned order it would more than apparent that the reasons have been given in well considered manner passed by the authority after weighing the materials on record. Such reasons, in fact have also stood in the test of order passed by the Full Bench in the case of „Project Uchcha Vidyalaya Shikshak Sangh & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.’ reported in 2000 (1) PLJR 287 and that of the Apex Court in the case of „State of Bihar & Ors. Vs. Project Uchcha Vidyalaya Shikshak Sangh & Ors’ reported in 2006 (1) PLJR 483 (S.C.). That being so, nothing would survive for adjudication after pronouncement of the judgment of Full Bench and the Apex Court as stated above. That being so, this application is wholly misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. Abhay Kumar ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)