IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35019 of 2011 Ranjeet Kumar, son of Raj Kumar Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- with Criminal Miscellaneous No.35810 of 2011 Steelwa @ Deepak, son of late Loha Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 24.11.2011 Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioners explaining the antecedent be kept on the record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners were refused bail by an order dated 23.8.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. 15929 of 2010 since they were a member of the mob which had killed two persons who had refused to contribute for a religious festival. The prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground that the petitioners are in custody since 21.11.2009 and there is no other case of similar nature pending against them. The specific assertion is that the charge has been framed but no witness has been examined till date. Considering the same, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of F.T.C.-IV, Patna, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 1257 of 2010 arising out of Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No. 463 of 2009, subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the 2 bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and the other shall be the father/mother of the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioners will be physically present on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail shall stand automatically cancelled. In view of the antecedents of the petitioners, the petitioners are directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Patna, within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next nine months. The conduct of the petitioners will be kept under watch in this period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioners before the court concerned. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)