ww’d //\ Smgm mm CD, a w.P. game. IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR %%§ / 2009 B.K.Sharma, S/o R.G.Sharma, Aged about 34 years, Director — Delhi Pattern School, Kasarideeh, District Durg—(C.G.) S.N.Meshram S/o Late Shri Raghunath Meshram, Aged about 41 years, Director — Siddharth Senior Secondary school, Camp— 2, Bhilai, Distt. Durg—(C.G.) Rakesh Kumar Dewangan S/o Ramavtar Dewangan, Aged about 28 years, Director —‘ Divyam Public Senior Secondary School, Sikosa, Durg, Distt. Durg—(C.G.) Shyam Bihari Mishra S/o Shri R.S,Misllra, Aged about 52 years, Director — G.S.Inter —’ College School, Shanti Nagar, Bhilai, Distt. Durg—(C.G.) H.P.Singh S/o P.R.Singh, Aged about 69 years, Director —v Umesh Kumar Memorial Senior Secondary School, Ghasidas Nagar, Bhilai, Distt. Durg—(C.G‘) V.N.Wankhede S/o Late Shri Maroti Rao Wankhede, Aged about 4O years, Director ~ .Adarsh Vishwabharti Open 8L Patrachar School, Kohka, Bhilai, Distt. Durg—(C.G.) Petitioners ’ @» /‘ Santosh Verma S/o Shri Eshwar Lal Verma, Aged about 27 years, Director — Maa Triveni Senior Secondary School, Kumhari, District — Durg-(C.G.) Rameshwar Prasad Yadav S/o Shri Saheb Lal Yadav, Aged about 49 years, Director — Suraj Convent School, Parsada, Distt. Janjgir Champa—(C.G.) I“ Basant Bharti S/o Shri K.Bharti, Aged about 23 years, Director — Bharti Senior Secondary School, Kohka, Bhilai, Distt. Durg—(C.G.) K.Venketraman S/o Late Shri K.Pentayya, Aged about 38 years, Director — Chatanya Senior Secondary School, Krishna Nagar, Bhilai, Distt. Durg—(C.G.) Versus Respondents :1.‘ i Chhattisgarh Board of Secondary, Education, Raipur, Through — The Secretary, Raipur— (co) Board of Higher Education, New Delhi, Government Registered Office, Kadkad—‘ Durriauma, New Delhi. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur—(CGJ z ¢ {ta , ’3 X/ .‘\€;‘yha1:2v.~¢,, [u 1/1. /. T /fr _\ U- HIGH COLRT OF CHHAJ‘TISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ({1} N0. 4982 0f2009 PETITIONERS : BKSharma & 0th6rs, VERSUS - RESPONDENTS : Cmaiiisgarh Board of Secondary Educatiml & Othsrs. WRIT PETH‘ION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hea’ble $hri Saitmh K. A0: nihotri. J2 reSem: A one Ior the penuonex P ahr; H B Aomwal Server aXdvoca‘Lu “11h Ms Plagya Smbh Aciwow‘re f0: ’{he 1e€p0ndsnt ho I $hr1 A V Shnohar Panel Lawyer Ior me State/respondent No 3 GRDER ORAL) (?a3sed on 12 day of November, 2G10) The matter is called for hearéng. None appears nor is any ropresen‘tation made on behalf of the peiitioner. Tho yetii‘ioner may 110i be interested in pursuing tho matter. In View of the abovs, the matter is dismissed for want of 4‘ __—_/ pTOSSCuUOII. . Sd/- ‘ i Satlsh K Agmhotrl Judge g’ r