IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 22ND MAGHA 1931 CRP.No. 1355 of 2003() ---------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 27/02/2003 IN EP.8/01 IN FDIA.861/84 IN OS.48/1977 of SUB COURT, KASARAGOD .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS: -------------------------------- 1. RADHAKRISHNA BHATT, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O.VENKATARAMNA BHAT, HINDU, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDING AT THAIRE AT THEKKIL VILLAGE P.O.THEKKIL KASARAGOD TALUK. 2. RAMACHANDRA BHAT, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.VENKATARAMANA BHAT, HINDU, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDING AT THAIRE OF THEKKIL VILLAGE, P.O.THEKKIL KASARAGOD TALUK. 3. ACHUTHA BHAT, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O. VENKATARAMANA BHAT, HINDU, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDING AT THAIRE AT THEKKIL VILLAGE, P.O.THEKKIL KASARAGOD TALUK. 4. GOVINDA BHAT, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.VENKATARAMANA BHAT, HINDU, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDING AT THAIRE OF THEKKIL VILLAGE, P.O.THEKKIL, KASARAGOD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS: -------------------------- 1. T.MADHAVA BHATTA, AGED 72 YEARS, S/O.KRISHNA BHATTA, HINDU, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDING AT THAIRE OF THEKKIL VILLAGE, P.O.THEKKIL, KASARAGOD TALUK. 2. P.VASUDEVA BHAT, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.T.MADHAVA BHATTA, HINDU, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDING AT THAIRE OF THEKKIL VILLAGE, P.O.THEKKIL KASARAGOD TALUK. CRP.1355/03 3. T.PADMANABHA BHAT, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O.T.MADHAVA BHATTA, HINDU AGRICULTURIST, RESIDING AT THAIRE AT THEKKIL VILLAGE, P.O.THEKKIL KASARAGOD TALUK. 4. T.GANESH, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O. T.MADHAVA BHATTA, HINDU, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDING AT THAIRE OF THEKKIL VILLAGE, P.O.THEKKIL, KASARAGOD TALUK. ADV. SRI.L.GOPALAKRISHNAN POTTI FOR R1 THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER IN I.A.NO.469/2003 IN C.R.P.NO.1355/2003 DISMISSED. 11.2.2010 S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------- C.R.P.NO.1355 OF 2003 () ----------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of February, 2010 O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the revision has become infructuous. Revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE prp S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------- C.R.P.NO.1355 OF 2003 () ----------------------------------- O R D E R 11th day of February, 2010