IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1018 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1018 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1018 OF 2006 Prajwal Bhimarao Jamkhandikar ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Maharashtra & 3 ors. ] .. Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr. N.Pandit, AGP, for the respondents No.1 and 3. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 19TH APRIL, 2006 P.C. : . Reply has been filed by the respondents. In the first Caste Certificate of the petitioner, the caste is shown as "Hindu Machgar" and his father is shown to hail from Bijapur, District Karnataka and hence, a migrant. This was issued on 16th December, 1994. Petitioner thereafter produced one more Caste Certificate of 21st July, 2000 showing against the caste as "Machigar", but then showing the address as of Solapur. The petitioner thereafter produced a third Caste Certificate showing the caste as "Chambhar (SC)" issued at Solapur. : 2 : 2. The petitioner’s Caste Certificate had been forwarded to the Committee. The Committee, on considering the material, including Vigilance Report, noted that the Caste Certificate issued and showing the petitioner belonging to "Hindu Machigar" has been cancelled and as such, he is not entitled to the benefits. From the material placed by the respondents, it is clear that the entire case of the petitioner is based on fraud. 3. Writ Petition rejected. Sd/- [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]