IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44734 of 2009 MOKIM MIAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 13.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case under Section 498A of the I.P.C. and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was married to the complainant in 1980 but the divorce was taken place in 1982, whereas in a maintenance case witnesses have deposed that the complainant has already married to some other person. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in maintenance case also notices were issued but complainant did not appear and the maintenance case was dismissed due to her non appearance. In the present proceeding also notices were issued on 19.02.2010 to O.P. No. 2 but the office note dated 12.04.2010 suggests that notices were received by the O.P. No. 2, even then she has not appeared till date. In view of the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner namely Mokim Mian, in the event of his arrest or 2 surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Complaint Case No. 2613C of 2007. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)