IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.O.P.C.(T) No. 210 of 2008. Decided on: 22nd October, 2010. Mangat Ram Dhani. …Petitioner. -Versus- V.C. Farka. …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondent. : Mr. P.M. Negi, DAG with Mr. R.P. Singh, AAG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): In view of the contents of paragraph No. 2 of the reply, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the petition is disposed of as infructuous. However, in case the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to make a representation to the competent authority for the redressal of his grievance. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge 22nd October, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?