IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19733 of 2011 Arun Ray @ Arun Kumar Ray Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. ----------- 03/- 27/07/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant with general allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. However, as submitted, petitioner still intends to resume and continue the matrimonial relationship with the complainant who is his one and only wife, and further, agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 500/- (five hundred only) per month to the complainant by way of interim maintenance, subject to any order on the point by the competent court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on the event of filing an application before the court below stating such intentions as stated above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the petitioner, namely, Arun Ray @ Arun Kumar Ray, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with Complaint Case No. 966 of 2010, T.R. No. 1967 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is 2 earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation or even on single default in payment, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)