IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3874 OF 2005 Rajendrasingh Jhajharia ..Petitioner. Vs. M/s.Weizmann Homes Ltd. ..Respondent. .... None for the Petitioner. Mr.S.A.Ghaisas for the Respondent. .... CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & F.I.REBELLO & F.I.REBELLO & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. JJ. JJ. 8th September, 2005. P.C. : Counsel for the Petitioner was absent when the matter was called out. Even otherwise, the Petitioner has a remedy of preferring an appeal under the Securitization Act against the notice issued. Considering that Petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy, no interference is called for. The Petition is rejected.