IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 26578 of 1999 Between: 1) Nadimpalli Subbaraju, (died) as per LR S/o. Seetarama Raju, R/o. Medaline Village, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 2) Peddireddi Narayana Swamy, S/o. Laxaman Rao, R/o. Medaline Village, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 3) Uppu Venkat Rao, S/o. Arjunudu, R/o. Medaline Village, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 4) Uppu Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Venkata Rao, R/o. Medaline Village, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 5) N. Subba Raju S/o. Veera Venkata Seetarama Raju R/o. Kakinada, E.G. District. Petitioner No.5 brought on record as LR of deceased Petitioner No.1 as per court order dt. 28-2-2005 in WPMP 31661 of 2004 ... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 2 The District Collector, East Godavari District, Kakinada. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 1st respondent in demolishing the buildings belonging to the petitioner and further action of the respondents in seeking to dispossess the petitioners and assign to third parties an extent of 19 cents of land in Sy.No.31/1B, 9 cents of land in Sy.No.31/1A2 and 3 cents of land in Sy.No.31/1A4, situated in Medaline Village, Kakinada, East Godavari District, belonging to us, as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, without jurisdiction, highhanded, violative of the Fundamental and Constitutional Rights guaranteed to the petitioners under Articles 14, 19(1) (g), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and issue a consequential direction to the respondents to pay compensation to the petitioners for high handedly demolishing the buildings belonging to the petitioners and further direct the respondents not to dispossess them from the above said lands or assign the same to third parties and pass such other order. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.SRINIVAS REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ASSIGNMENT Thde Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ________________ C.Y.SOMAYAJULU, J Dated : 15.03.2005 RAR To 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 2 The District Collector, East Godavari District, Kakinada. 3 2 CCs to G.P for Assignment,High Court Bldgs,.Hyd.(OUT) 4 2 CD copies.