CRM No. M 3306 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 3306 of 2011 Date of decision: 07.04.2011 Ekta Tuli and another ........ Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C praying for issuance of direction to respondent No. 2 to 5 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners by providing adequate police protection which respondents No. 2 to 5 are not providing despite the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 20.01.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners had approached this Court by filing CRM M 1705 of 2010. The same was disposed of vide order dated 20.01.2011 with direction to the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana to look into the grievances of the petitioners. However, CRM No. M 3306 of 2011 2 despite the said order and despite the fact that the petitioners were threatened by respondents No. 6 to 11 but no action was taken. Accordingly, they made a second representation to the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana on 21.01.2011. Still no action was taken. Reply has been filed. As per the reply, on receipt of the orders of this High Court, the commissioner of Police, Ludhiana directed Shri Jagdev Singh, Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police III, Ludhiana to make enquiry into the grievances of the petitioners vide order No. 9079 dated 28.01.2011. ASI Harbhajan Singh was directed to comply with the orders of Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana. ASI Harbhajan Singh called both the petitioners Ekta Tuli and Neeraj Tuli. Their statements have been recorded. Both the petitioners have stated that there is no danger to their lives from respondents No. 6 to 11. They also stated that nobody is harassing them and they need no security and were living happily. In these circumstances, no security was provided. In view of the above, no further order is called for. However, in case, the petitioners still feel threatened, they are at liberty to get their grievances redressed as per the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No. 6717 of 2009 titled as Asha Kaur v. State of Haryana and others, decided on 15.10.2010. Disposed of accordingly. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 07.04.2011 mohan