3 iNtai ^ICB IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fSI N0. ya^H9 /2006 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ..** >..-•' <lx. c^.'^ ^^^' $:^SL-"""; —-ft^'N\.--' :- ^ Pporan Lal Jaiswal, aged 34 years, son of Manharan Lal Jaiswal, R/o village Kodwa Mahant, Tahsil Lormi, DistrictBUaspur [C.G.]. VERSUS ^ 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through— Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.]. C;:^i>t'^\ ^^'•>f^-^>-* ''•"'^' .'•••" ^y^-""" "•^'"A--"" y'/jc^0< / 2] The Director, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Bilaspur [C.G.]. /3] Janpad Panchayat Lormi, Through- Chief Executive Officer, Lormi, District Bilaspur [C.G.]. ^4] Gram Panchayat- Chliaparva, through Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Chhaparva, Tahsil Lormi, District Bilaspur [C.G.]. y . - • WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HI6H COURT OF 3UbICA71SE^HHAmS6ARH^BILASPUR Bench; Hon'ble Shn Satssh K. Agnihotri. J. a Petitioner Respondents P.CsSNo. 5249 of 200^ Pooran Lal Jaiswal Versus State of Chhcttisgarh & othei Shri Ravindra Agrawa!, counsel for tiie petitloner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, ©ovt.Advocate for the State. Bablu ilrf Sl^ &^ Ith O >4-i ^arned counsel appearing for the petltioner, on instruc submits tiiat the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition, to whlch learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection. 2. The writ petition is accordingSy dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge