IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Date:- 06.01.2010 Coram The Honourable Mr. Justice M. CHOCKALINGAM and The Honourable Mr. Justice T. RAJA O.S.A. Nos.386 and 387 of 2003 and C.M.P. Nos.21142 & 21143 of 2004 and C.S. Nos.725 & 726 of 2002 Fiat Avio S.P.A., rep. by its P.A. Holder Anoj Menon ... Appellant in both appeals and Plaintiff in both suits ..Vs.. Ashley Investments Limited, having its registered office at 19, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 001. ... Respondent in O.S.A. No.386/2003 Ashley Holdings Limited, having its registered office at 19, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 001. ... Respondent in O.S.A. No.387/2003 Ashley Holdings Limited, by its Director, 19, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 001. ... 1st defendant in C.S. No.725/2002 Ashley Investments Limited, rep. by its Director, 19, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 001. ... 1st defendant in C.S. No.726/2002 Ashok Leyland Limited, rep. by its Managing Director, 19, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 001. ... 2nd defendant in both suits https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Original Side Appeals filed against the order dated 28.4.2003 passed in C.P. Nos.543 and 544 of 2000 on the file of this Court and Civil suits filed to direct the defendants jointly and severally to make payment to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.6,27,75,342/- together with further interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the principal amount of Rs.5,50,00,000/- from the date of plaint till the date of decree and thereafter till the date of realisation. For Appellant : Ms. Anitha Sumanth For Respondent : Mr. R. Prem Kumar for M/s. King and Patridge JUDGMENT (Judgment was delivered by M. CHOCKALINGAM, J.) On the last occasion, when the matter was posted for settlement, it was represented by the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties that two more suits in C.S. Nos.725 and 726 of 2002 were connected to these appeals and the compromise memo was to be filed in respect of these two appeals and also those two civil suits. 2. This day (06.01.2010), when the above matters are taken up for consideration, a compromise memo has been filed before this Court and the same is recorded. According to the learned counsel, compromise memo would cover all the four proceedings viz. two appeals and two suits. The same is recorded. Accordingly, the aforesaid appeals and suits are disposed of. The compromise memo shall form part of the Court proceedings. 3. In view of the fact that the suits are settled, the respective parties are entitled for Court fee. Accordingly, the Registry is directed to refund the Court fee on making deductions thereon in respect of civil suits. Consequently, the connected C.M.Ps. are closed. No costs. ssa. Sd/- Asst. Registrar //True Copy// Sub Asst. Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ To The Sub Assistant Registrar (Original Side), High Court, Madras. + 1 cc to M/s. King & Partridge, SR No.938 + 2 ccs to Dr. Anita Sumanth, Advocate SR No.945 KSK(CO) SR/21.1.2010 O.S.A. Nos.386 and 387 of 2003 and C.S. Nos.725 & 726 of 2002 and connected C.M.Ps. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/