1 FARAD CONSTITUTION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3188/2007 Sau Pushapabai Lahu Diwane ...Versus... State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai – 32 and others -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (S/Shri S.J. Khandalkar & R.N. Meshram, Advs. for petitioner) CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 23.07.2007. By the present petition, the petitioner has questioned the validity of the orders passed by the Additional Collector as well as Additional Commissioner in the proceedings relating to motion of no confidence against the petitioner. Shri Khandalkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued that under Rule 2 (2) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Sarpanch And Up-Sarpanch (No Confidence Motion) Rules, 1975 copy of requisition is required to be supplied to the petitioner and other members of the Panchayat, but that was not done in this case. The 2 Courts below have found no substance in this contention on facts for want of proper evidence. There is no need to interfere with the impugned orders in extraordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court. Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE ssw