IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 25087 of 2006 Between: 1 Sri.K.V.Ramakrishna Sarma S/o.late Rama Jayanth Sarma R/o.H.No.1-7-110/98/555, Shyamlalpet, Begumpet, Hyderabad. 2 K.V.Annapurna D/o.Late Rama Jayanth sarma R/o.H.No.1-7-110/98/555, Shyamlalpet, Begumpet, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of A.P., rep. by its Special Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Hyderabad. 3 The District Collector, Hyderabad District at Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, declaring the inaction of the respondents herein in disposing the application dt. 16.06.2006 made by the petitioners herein for regularization of the schedule land situated in Survey No.129/98 (New) and Old Survey No.403, of Shaikpet Village Banjara Hills, Hyderabad District, as illegal, arbitrary, against all cannons of fair-play and natural justice and contrary to the provisions of Revenue Laws and consequently direct the respondents herein to dispose the application dt. 16.06.2006 made by the petitioners herein for regularization of the schedule land situated in Survey No.129/98 (New) and Old Survey No.403, of Shaikpet village, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad District, and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioners : MR. SITA RAM CHAPARLA Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.25087 OF 2006 ORDER : It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and therefore no further adjudication is necessary. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _____________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 22.12.2008 gbs