IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2010 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 21025 of 2008(Y) ----------------------- PETITIONER : -------------------- NEETHU PARVATHY P.K., D/O.KANNAN, POOVATHUMKADAVIL HOUSE, P.O.PANANGAD, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DT. BY ADVS. SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI.K.S.RAJESH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. BOARD OF HIGHER SECONDARY EXAMINATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 2. THE DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REP. BY THE REGISTRAR. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, CHRIST COLLEGE, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DT. 5. THE PRINCIPAL, ST.JOSEPH'S COLLEGE, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DT. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. RANI DIOTHIMA R3 BY ADV. SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN, SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 21025 of 2008(Y) -2- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE MARK LIST DATED 15.5.2008 ISSUED BY THE 1ST & 2ND RESPONDENTS. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF IMPROVEMENT EXAM DOWN LOADED FROM THE WEB SITE. EXT.P3 : COPIES OF THE INTERVIEW CARDS DATED 5.7.08 & 7.7.08 ISSUED BY THE 4TH & 5TH RESPONDENTS. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.21025 Of 2008 C ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 8th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking for a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to issue the original mark list of the improvement examination for 'Accountancy with Computer Accounting' in plus two course. As per the interim order this Court directed respondents 4 and 5 to consider the petitioner's claim for admission on the basis of the mark list of the petitioner down loaded from the website of the Government of Kerala for the purpose of admission. Going by the averments in the Writ Petition, the petitioner was expecting the issuance of the original mark list by 14th or 15th of July 2008. But the interview was scheduled as per Exhibit P3 series before that date and it is in this context that the petitioner filed this Writ Petition. 2. The learned Standing Counsel for the University submitted that the matter has become infructuous. The petitioner would have received the mark list also by this time. The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/-( T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.) dsn