1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO.410 OF 2009 R.D. Gupta ..Petitioner. Vs. Union of India ..Respondent. .... Mr. S.U. Kamdar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Chetan Kapadia i/b Jurists Uno for the Petitioner. Mr. H.K. Vardhan with Mr. V.B. Tiwari for the Respondent. .... CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 4th March, 2009. P.C. : 1. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties for some time. We have serious doubts as to the very maintainability of the writ petition questioning the legality of the order passed on 19th December, 2008 by the Learned Single Judge of this Court on the Official Liquidator's report as well as the order dated 22nd December, 2008. 2. Be that as it may, it is not necessary for us to examine the 2 legality or otherwise of this objection, in view of the directions that we propose to issue on this writ petition. In our considered opinion the order dated 22nd December, 2008 is an administrative order simplicitor and ex facie does not cast any stigma upon the Petitioner. 3. The Petitioner submits that he has made a representation keeping in view the letter of the Official Liquidator dated 22nd Decembr, 2008 referring to the complaint of the advocates etc. If such a representation has been moved to the competent authority, the respective authority shall deal with it in accordance with law and if necessary after giving the Petitioner an opportunity of hearing. The Petition is disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.