IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21100 of 2010 1. AKAL RISHIDEO @ AKALU @ RISHIDEO 2. RAM SAGAR GOSWAMI Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 25/06/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioners in a police case under Sections- 302/34 of Indian Penal Code from the impugned order of rejection is that the prosecution case rests on circumstantial evidence when the co-accused named along with petitioners have been enlarged on bail in Cr. Misc. No.46320/09. Considering grant of bail to co-accused Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case let the petitioners above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Suppl. Banmankhi P.S. Case No.24 of 2009. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)