IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35916 of 2009 SUNITA DEVI WIFE OF LATE RAJBALI MALI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.11.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 21/22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is the tenant in the house of one Banarsi Mahto, from whose house two kgs of ganja was recovered and also the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 18.11.2008, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Begusarai in connection with N.D.P.S. case No.9 of 2008 arising out of Khodabandpur P.S.case No.119 of 2008, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if she is she shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that she will inform the court concerned if the 2 petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after her release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (iv) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )