IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2104 of 2007 BACHU YADAV & ORS Versus RAGHU YADAV & ORS ----------- 3 21.8.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, the impugned order, setting aside ex-parte judgment and decree, does not suffer from any jurisdictional error inasmuch as the Court below after giving a detailed consideration of the matter has come to a finding that the defendant, opposite parties on the basis of material on record had a valid cause for such setting aside the ex-parte decree. The Court below in fact even thereafter had allowed such prayer of the defendant opposite party after imposing a cost of Rs. 2,000/- and therefore, it is apparent that the delay or harassment caused to the plaintiff, petitioner was also duly compensated. In that view of the matter this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. This civil revision application is in fact wholly misconceived and accordingly the same is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)