v Petitioner Resoondents HiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BiLASPUR Writ Pgiition No.S39 of 2002 Hirala!, aged about 71 ysars, S/o Late Sevak Ram Ubrani, Resident of Torv.'a, Biiaspur, Tah & Distt.Biiaspur (C.G.) Vsrsus 1. Stsie of Chhsttisgarh, Through ths Secretary, Department of Revenue, syiantraiaya, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. The Coiiecior, Biiaspur (Chhatiisgarh) 3. Addi.Coiiector, Biiaspur (Chhsttisgarh) 4. Sub Divisionai Oificsr (Rsvenus), Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 5. The Tahsiidar, Biiaspur (ChhatSisgarh) 6. Addi.Tahsiidar, (Chhattisgarh) Biiaspur (Writ Pstition underArtfoie 226 & 227 ofthe Constiiuiion of India) Nons present for the petitioner. Mr.Vinod Tekam. Pane! Lawyer for the respondents/State. (SB: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) ORDER (29-11-2011) 1. By this writ petition under Articie 226 & 227 of ihe Constitution of india t'ne pststioner has chaiienged the legaiity and propriety of ths order dated 27.4.2002 passed by the Additionai Tahsildar, Bilaspur, !R Rsvenue Csse No.12-A'19/2001-2092, whereby ihe Additiona! Tahsiidar has msde recommencsation. 2. The Additionai Tahsildar, Biiaspur has not passed any f!na! ordsr, he has made oniy recommendation and other order which has been passed or may be passed bythe rsvenue authorittes are appsaSabis and revisioabis under Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Cods. ;ons!dsring the aforesaid fact, ths writ petition te dlsmissed summariiy. 3. Co No order as to iN»V>Oi3. Sd/- T.P.Sharma Judge B"