IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.R. No.: 263 of 2003. Decided on: 02.11.2011. _______________________________________________ Prem Chand and others. … Petitioners. Versus Ramesh Chand and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Rajnish K. Lall, Advocate vice Mr. K.D. Sood, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): It is jointly represented by the learned counsel for the parties that since the matter has been compromised between the parties, the present revision is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 02, 2011. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?