1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1076 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1321 OF 2010 Smt. Bhanuben H. Tandel ...Appellant. v. Smt. Diwaliben U. Tandel & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. C.M.Kothari, adv. For the Appellant. Mr. V.B.Naik i/by Nitin Mulye, advs. For the Respondent Nos.1 to 6. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 8, 2010 P.C. 1 The original defendant has preferred the appeal against the exparte ad-interim injunction restraining him from causing any obstruction in the possession of the plaintiff over the suit land. The main application, Ex.5 for temporary injunction is still not decided and it is stated to be fixed on 15th September, 2010. The learned counsel for the appellant/defendant no.3 makes a statement that reply to the application, Ex.5 has been already filed. Therefore, in my considered opinion, following directions will meet the ends of justice: (a) The learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Daman shall hear the application for temporary injunction on 15th 2 September, 2010 and shall pass the order thereon within one week thereafter. Meanwhile, parties shall maintain status-quo. 2 The trial Court shall not be influenced by the order of status-quo passed by this Court. With these directions, appeal as well as civil application stand disposed off. Parties and the trial Court shall act upon an authenticated copy of this order. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)