IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.414 of 2011 MEENA DEVI WIFE OF DAMODAR ROY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ISMILEPUR (HARAULI), P.S. HAJIPUR SADAR, DISTT. VAISHALI ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. I.G. BHAGALPUR ZONE, BHAGALPUR. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BEGUSARAI. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 12.1.2011. Heard Shri Kaushal Kishore, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ritesh Kumar, learned A.C. to AAG III. Petitioner’s husband was in police service. She has prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of all the retiral dues and arrears of salary to the petitioner. It was submitted that petitioner’s husband was an A.S.I. and he was relieved for joining Godda. However, he could not join the new place due to some accident. He remained absent for long time and subsequently, as per the petitioner, her husband superannuated with effect from 1.12.2007. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing has been paid to the husband of the petitioner. It was further submitted that husband of the petitioner is not in a position to move. For N.H./ the aforesaid grievances, the petitioner has also filed a representation before the Director General of Police, respondent no.2. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 i.e. Director General of Police within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, the respondent no.2 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order for redressal of all the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. In case of refusal, the respondent no.2 is required to pass a speaking order within aforesaid time. With aforesaid observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)