THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 5192 of 2006 DATED: 24.03.2006 BETWEEN: Kanugulla Venkataiah .. Petitioner And The Station House Officer, Talakondapalli and others ..Respondents THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 5192 of 2006 ORAL ORDER: The petitioner complains of the inaction of respondents 1 and 2 in providing protection to the petitioner from the alleged illegal and unlawful demands of the fourth respondent and his henchmen. The petitioner is a resident of Venkataraopet Village, Talakondapali Mandal, Mahabubnagar District, and an agriculturist. According to the petitioner, his younger brother one K.Vijay Kumar fell in love with one C.Sumathi of the same village. Both of them eloped from the village in March, 2006 without informing the petitioner. On the petitioner’s enquiry he came to know that C.Sumathi was a minor, aged 17 years. According to the petitioner, the Sub Inspector of Police, Telakondapally is calling upon him and his family members to come to the police station frequently and is threatening them with dire consequences, stating that the parents of the girl had complained. The petitioner apprehends threat to his life and property from the 4th respondent. The 4th respondent is claimed to be a mediator on behalf of the parents of the girl C.Sumathi. The learned Government Pleader for Home has obtained instructions from the official respondents and submits that no complaint about the threat from 4th respondent has been received and that as and when a complaint is received, the respondents 1 to 3 would take appropriate action after assessing the threat perception to the petitioner’s life. The learned Government Pleader also states that the respondents 1 to 3 have never threatened the petitioner nor harassed him or his family members. In view of the aforementioned instructions received on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3, to which there is no demurral on the part of the writ petitioner, no further proceedings are warranted. The petitioner is at liberty to make a complaint, which if made, shall be considered and appropriate action taken by the respondents 1 to 3. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. _________________________ Justice Goda Raghuram Dated: 24-03-2006 kvrm