E ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 2-fct2>3 / 2011 PETITIONER MOHD. SHAFI S/o Mohd. Jumma Aged about 34 Years, Uneinployed, Residing at: Village : Bijhara, Tehsil & Post: Katghora, District: Korba (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS R^SPONDENTS ^^^ .....r^V^ »^^-2. ^yr' 4. State of Chhattisgarh & Others. Through : The Secretary, Panchayat Department, D.K.S.Bhwan, Mantralaya, RAIPUR (CG) The Controller ofExamination, Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board, C/ 168, Tagore Nagar, RAIPUR (CG) The ChiefExecutive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Ambikapur, District: Sarguja (C.G.) The District Collector, Collectorate Office, (Ambikapur) Sarguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUT10N OF INDIA A. .^^..d.sa-.ca.. -CT3 'C-^LI—;—3C^-I^U^I^l-d~l^ILdC.^A—Tr] sn^ivi k-w* '^IT STT^Tstitff^? ^epti wtRfr a>*ii<ft ^°r-^ww^, w-^ww, hv\wy ii^,P-(&V^D.5£,SAy V^ 200 gn^n TpRi' (1pf3^^) TOIIWflfei 311^1 SB: Hon'bte ShrlManindra Moha<i Shrivastaya, j. irrebularity 13-05-2011 Shri Dhirendra Mishra, couns^l Shri Sushit Dubey, Govt. Adv| The grievance of the petitior|er, the petitioner was setected for appo) of counseling which was issued to| 9/2/2011 whereas the counsetling w^s fault of the petitioner, he was deprhfed the petitioner submits tiiat this irrebul; Chief Executive Officer vide Annexiire to be the appeliate authority unde|- Karmi (Recruitment and Conditions) Ruies of 2007), an application / aprieai been decided. The Coiiector is the designal 2007. The grievance of the petitiorjt by the Collector as a designated Accordingly, respondent No.4 is d| petitioner as appeat and decide theina With the aforesaid obsewati(ins, q>l<(I<1«ilt IIHcil tf IS^t <r<<t^l< iTaifinan^T il for the petitioner. forthe State/ respondent No.1 and 4. r, as set put in the petition is that even ntment as Shiksha Karmi, Grade-11, ietter the petitioner was served as late as on already hetd on 3/2/2011 . Thus, for no from counseling. Learned counsel for was brought to the notice of the P/6 and since, the Coilector happens the Ruies of C.G. Panchayat Shiksha of Service) Rules, 20)7 ( for short" the was aiso made, but the same has not (ed appellate authority under the Rutes of fer therefore, is required to be iooked into aFlpellate authority under the Ruies of 2007. frected to treat the representation of the thehatter in accordance with law. >, the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge