tliQLE.MSfefcyi r,^: m .THE.HON&BLBHIGH COURT OP CEiHATTZSSATOI AT BZliAS'UR ^ - / • ! ^ .;: * - ^ ^ ;•' s- s- writ Petifcion N^§4^^1/2005 PETITZpNER t^ ^ .RSSPOND^ENTS VERSUS ^- /^ A^'"./ 0<...-^/ ./ p^/y/. / ^.-^/t// ->:/'BS/ <5:''S/' ...-•'^?sc)/' ^'^'/^/ ^'" ^' / ^f' <vy r" ^ ^" Ram Awtar S/o Ju^|lal- :by casfce HaJL» aged 36 years^ Sarpanch of G2^am Panchaya fc" Pal i, Tah1: Takhatpur ^ Disferj.at Silaspur (C<G»$. 1) Darashrajn S/o Tihari^ by caste Qond, aged 50 years» l:i/o|i • Pal i, Talchafepu.r> Distriat .Bilaspur <c,s»)jg 2) Kanoj Kumar S/o Anand Madhav By casfce Bramhan^ aged 40 years» 3) Ashol^ IKumar S/o Balzrom by casfee Bramhan^ agcd about -50 years^ 4) iSuldeep S/o Ramlochan by casfce, Bramhan^ aged about 30 years^ 5) Delaiya BajL w/o Laharu^ by caste Gondf aged about 50 yearsi 6) Dwarika S/o Dhanaram by caste Nai, aged 46 years* 7) PAwan Bas S/o Itwariy by aaste Panika aged 47 years^ 8) VQQF Singh S/o Balwant by caste- Gond, aged about 30 years<» 9) Mahash Kuraar S/o Balwanfc by caste Qondy aged about 28 yQars^ 10) Rajkumar S/o Phool singh, by caste Ken1wat» aged about 32 years< 11) Ram Singh S/o Nakcdihed, by caste Gondt aged aboub 47 years^ 12) Shobhifc Singn S/o Shiv Singh by caste Gond, agedabout 36 years| -2» ( 2 ) 13) sukhiram S/o Sepuram^ by caste Ken^^fct aged about 4§ years^ All are R/O village Paii, Tah< T^Miatpur, Qistrict Bilaspur (C»G,)t 14) Assisfcant Retuming OffJLcer/ Tahsildar Takhatpur. Panchayat Election No, 95, village Pali, Tahsil Takhatpur, District - Biiaspur (C*G<). ^IS) The Sub D.Lvisional Offieer (Rev^i) Kota, Disfericfc Bilaspur (C»G«)i| ,-LO Thc- Co^k<?t6^ ^ Q\\^1fW(c^^ WRIT PBTITXON UNDER ARTIO^E 227 OP THE CDNSTITUTION QP_ INDIA^ XI-HC-78 *imoi^*rT^ <;i;wci^<<fi|l«^,^•ultl<l<s, Rrtl^iyt ..y.; W^200^ 3tT^?T q^?P (»jc||j6|t£;) 3TT^T<PlRrli<h ^nw^^T^b^icb ?;^Sf7 ;?rf^?T CT^^T <pi<<l0<T|ri *ii+iol'^rf^^£l<Ri<ci<< ^3lf^:f3TT^^t ^. ^ - 14-9.2005 .. 1; ; iVlr. MaiayKymar Bhadurij Mr. Parag Kotecha, Panel| Heard both the counsel. The petltloner has fl!ed Constitution of India, aggrieved Specified Officer {Sub DJvisionaj in Revenue Case; No,30/AM8^ Speclfied Officer has rej- petltioner herein on the ground (2) of the Chhattisgarh Panchay| Djsquaiiflcation for Members^ malntainabie, ! have perused the order. The petitioner herein is er|< maln election petitlon and learrj' along with the main.petjtion atth| Wlth thls obsen/ation, the| In view of this order, M.CVf of. Parties are entitled for ceil counsel forthe petitioner. [Lav/yer for the of Chhattisgarh. |this writ petition under Articie 227 of the |by the order dated 4a-7"2005 passed by the Officer (Revenue)}, Koia, District: Bilaspur, •8^(9)/2004-2005 EJection Petition, whereby j^cted the preijminary objection raised by the |hat on accoun^ of non-cbmpliance of Rule 3 ^ts (EIection Petitions, Oorrupt Practlces and lip) Ru!es, 1995, the petition is not titled to raise this objectjon In his repiy to the ed Specified Officer shali decide thls point time of disposa! of the .electlon petition. writ petition is dlsposed of. '.)P.No.3540/2005 & I.A.No.7885/2005 stand :ified copy of thls order. 8d/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge /<s .<?