:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE SECOND APPEAL SECOND APPEAL SECOND APPEAL NO.570 OF 2008 NO.570 OF 2008 NO.570 OF 2008 Akubai Ramji Kamble (Since deceased through her heir) Pandurang Ramji Kamble ...Appellant. v. 1.Shri Dnyanu Babu Bansode & Anr. ...Respondents. Mr.M.V.Limaye , adv. for the Appellant. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 10th September, 2008. DATE: 10th September, 2008. DATE: 10th September, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. This is second appeal filed by the original plaintiff. According to the plaintiff/appellant, he is the owner of the house bearing no. 182 and the defendant is owner of the house bearing no.181 situated at Mouje Alsund, Taluka: Khanapur, District: Sangli. According to him, between the two houses, there is 2 and half ft. wide common lane and the defendant had encroached upon that common lane by making construction. He sought decree for removal of construction. Claim of the plaintiff was denied by the defendant. According to him, he had made construction on his own plot and that there was no lane between the two houses. After hearing the parties, the trial Court dismissed the suit filed by :2: the plaintiff. Plaintiff preferred regular civil appeal no.129 of 1998. Appeal was also dismissed. There is concurrent findings of the fact by both the Courts below that the defendant has constructed on his own property and there was no lane between the two houses. In view of this, there is no substantial question of law involved in the present appeal. 3. In the result, appeal stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)