IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 5TH AUGUST 2010 / 14TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 23432 of 2010(D) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ JEEVAN MATHEW MANAYANI, AGED 24, S/O.ADV.JOHNSON MANAYANI, MANAYANI LANE, MONASTRY ROAD, COCHIN-11. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.SUNIL RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENHIPALAM PO, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENHIPALAM PO, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENHIPALAM PO, MALAPPURAM, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR. 4. THE BAR COUNCIL OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN, HIGH COURT OF COMPLEX, ERNAKULAM. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY , GOVT. SECRETARIAT,TRIVANDRUM. 6. GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE, TRICHUR, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL. R5 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.P. NARAYANAN. R1 TO R3 & R6 BY ADV. MR.P.C. SASIDHARAN, SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/08/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ---------------------- W.P.(C). No. 23432 of 2010 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 5th day of August, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a student of L.L.B. course in the 5th respondent's College. He failed in the 10th semester examination in the subject “Human rights” and he applied for revaluation. He was informed that in the revaluation, there was no change in the marks. Petitioner submits in Thichur Law College, the percentage of pass is very low compared to other college and the petitioner apprehends some irregularity in the valuation process. The petitioner, therefore, seeks valuation of the answer papers again by an expert. 2. When it was pointed out by the learned counsel for petitioner that the Supreme Court has categorically held that the High Court shall not order revaluation unless there is a specific rule provided for the same, the learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer for a direction to the Vice Chancellor of the University to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 representation filed by the petitioner expeditiously. 3. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. W.P.(C). No. 23432 / 2010 2 4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this Writ Petition with a direction to the second respondent-Vice Chancellor of the university, to consider and pass orders of Ext.P4 as expeditiously as possible at any rate within a period of one month from the date of a copy of this judgement. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ln