IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 8550 of 2008 Decided on: 24.12.2010 Ishwar Dass …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr. B.S. Ranjan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General, with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. None for respondents No. 3 to 5 Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The only ground taken by the petitioner assailing the appointment of respondent No.5 for the post of Part Time Water Carrier in Government Primary School, Sainj, Block Sunni, District Shimla is that his close relatives are in government service. However, neither the relationship nor the posts held by these persons have been disclosed. 2. Since, the suitability of the petitioner and respondent No. 5 has been gone into by the duly constituted selection committee. Consequently, this Court will not sit in appeal over the recommendations made by the selection committee. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- 3. However, the rejection of the petition will not debar the petitioner from making any representation for the redressal of his grievance, if so advised. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 24, 2010 (K. Attri)