1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR : O R D E R : S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4869/2006 (Mrs. Sushila Saharan Vs. RPSC & Ors.) Date of Order :: 05.08.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.Mahendra Singh on behalf of Mr.R.S. Saluja, for the petitioner. Mr.Tarun Joshi, for respondent RPSC. Mr.B.L. Bhati, Dy. Govt. Counsel. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this case, petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents to provide 21% reservation on the post of Lecturer (Home Science) for OBC category in the total vacancies of current year. Further it is prayed that if petitioner comes within the preview of posts reserved for OBC category then her candidature may kindly be considered for appointment on the post of Lecturer (Home Science). The petitioner has applied for recruitment on the post of Lecturer (Home Science) in pursuance of advertisement issued 2 by RPSC in the category of OBC and claiming her right on the ground that vacancies were not correctly determined. In ground (A) of the reply, it is specifically stated by the respondents that reservation has been provided as per Roster and out of 41 posts, 9 posts were backlog vacancies and in remaining 32 posts, reservation has been provided as per Rules in which there is no illegality. I have perused the advertisement. When specific reply has been filed clarifying the correct position, then in my opinion there is no illegality in determination of vacancies because out of 41 posts, 9 posts were filed in as backlog vacancies and for remaining 32 vacancies reservation has been provided as per roster which is in accordance with rules. In this view of the matter, there is no force in the writ petition. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS),J. A.K. Chouhan/-