IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.1329 of 2011 Date of Decision : January 24, 2011. Gurnam Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.D.S.Pheruman, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is working as a Lower Division Clerk in the respondent-Corporation. He is aggrieved by his transfer from Amritsar to Sangrur. The petitioner has explained the hardship in para No.6 of the writ petition to urge that the impugned transfer order dated 7.1.2011 (Annexure P-4) needs to be interfered with by this Court. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the fact that the transfer is an incidence of service and there are no extra-ordinary circumstances which may warrant interference by a writ Court, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to represent the respondent-authorities explaining the hardship as mentioned in para No.6 of the writ petition. If any such C.W.P.No .1329 of 2011 2 representation is made by the petitioner, the respondents are directed to consider the same sympathetically and dispose of the same within a period of one month from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. January 24, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE