1 nms3012.06.sxw ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3012 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO. 2303 OF 2006 Krishnamilan G. Shukla ....Plaintiff. Vs. The Pubjab & Maharashtra Co-operative Bank Ltd., & Ors. Defendants. Mr. Vikas Pandey i/by Mr. B.P. Pandey for the Plaintiff. Mr. Rahul Rao i/by Mr. I.V. Rao for Defendant No.2. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 9th FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C.: In a suit for specific performance, the Plaintiff has taken out this motion for interim protection/ injunction, in August, 2006, but till this date, it was never persuaded and is pending since then without any interim relief. 2 The learned counsel appearing for the Defendants makes statement that pursuance to the agreement, third party rights have already been created and some parties are joined as party to the suit. 2 nms3012.06.sxw ssm Any way, there is no point in keeping this motion pending. However, the liberty is granted to the Plaintiff to take out appropriate motion to bring update record. 3 The motion is accordingly dismissed with liberty. No costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)