THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1758 OF 2010 DT.30.04.2010 Between: Macherla @ Tiruveedhula Haritha and another ……………..Petitioner Vs .None O R D E R: This revision petition is filed by the petitioners assailing the order passed in I.A.No.1243 of 2009 in H.M.O.P.No.173 of 2009 on the file of the Court of Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District Judge, Guntur, dated 17.12.2009, wherein and whereby the application filed by the petitioners under Section 13 of Family Courts Act to permit them to engage counsel to prosecute their case and also under Section 109 (2) of Civil Rules of Practice to advance the said O.P., from 11.06.2010 was dismissed holding that under Section 13 (b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, only Supreme Court can relax six months period prescribed by the Section by virtue of powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India and thereby rejected the application. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Having regard to the fact that the prescribed period for which the petitioners are seeking the relief is likely to be over by June 2010, I do not find any reason to interfere with the order passed by the court below and I see no merit in the revision petition. The revision petition is, therefore, dismissed. No costs. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO J., Dt.30.04.2010 tjs