IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4039 of 2011 1. SURENDRA YADAV SON OF LAKHAN YADAV. 2. MAHENDRA YADAV SON OF LAKHAN YADAV, BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE: NAVADIH, POLICE STATION- BARACHATTY, DISTRICT- GAYA. .. PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 18.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Barachatty (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 150 of 2007 pending in the Court of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati (Gaya) registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 436, 427, 379 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3, 4, and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act and Section 17 of the Cr.L.A. Act. The accusation is of exploding the house of the informant by bomb. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioners and the informant are cousin brothers and subsequently informant has compromised the case and filed a petition to that effect before the learned Court below. It is further submitted that the other accused persons have been granted regular bail. I see no reason that the learned Court below will not give same privilege to the 2 petitioners. Let, the learned Court below pass an appropriate order for grant of regular bail of the petitioners, keeping in view that other accused persons have been granted regular bail and the informant has retracted from his initial version, and dispose off the regular bail application of the petitioners preferably on the same day, if the petitioners surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks. Ibrar/- ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)