IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31484 of 2009 BRIJNATH SINGH @ BAIJU SINGH. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. ----------- 3. 12.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a Police case under Section 302 and other provisions of the Penal Code is that he is one of the 29 named accused with omnibus allegations and that at best he may have been a member of the mob only considering his advance age of 72 years. The post-mortem report shows that the deceased had as many as 8 injuries on his person. The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merits including his advance age without being prejudiced by the present order. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)