1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. C.A.W. NO.77 OF 2011. IN WRIT PETITION NO.2383 OF 2009 (DECIDED) SHRI DATTATRAY ATMARAM GANFADE VS DISTRICT SUPDT. OF POLICE, CHANDRAPUR AND 2 OTHERS ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. K. D. Deshpande Advocate for the applicant. Mr. M. J. Khan, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATE : 17th JANUARY 2011. 1. This is application for speaking to the minutes. 2. In the Judgment and order passed by this Court on 18-10-2010 in Writ Petition No.2383 of 2009, the following wording is seen “We find that these letters being subsequent in time could not be placed before the Tribunal and since now there is a reasonable offer in the said lattes and further offer by the petitioner to forgo the 'entire' back wages, in our opinion, the mater is required to be sent back to the Tribunal exercising power of review”. [Quoted from page no.8 & 9 of application paper book] 2 3. By this application, the petitioner is taking exception to the word “entire” appearing with back wages. 4. Learned Advocate Mr. Deshpande further prays for correcting the date “12-10-2010” appearing in paragraph nos.3, 5 & 6 to “19-7-2010”. 5. In the pursis, the petitioner had offered that he will be foregoing 50% back wages. However, one amongst us (Hon'ble Shri Justice A. B. Chaudhari who was Member of earlier Bench) distinctly recollects that offer to forego entire back wages was made during oral submission by the learned Advocate for the petitioner. 6. In view of this, no change or modification for correction whatsoever by deleting the word “entire” or substituting by 50% is required or warranted. 7. It is seen that the date “12-10-2010” corresponds to the date of pursis. The letter of the Additional Superintendent of Police relied upon by the petitioner is dated 19-7-2010. 8. The date “12-10-2010” appearing in paragraph nos.3,5 & 6 of Judgment and order passed in Writ Petition No.2383 of 2009 dated 18-10-2010 be substituted by “19-7-2010”. 3 9. We, therefore, partly allow this application to the extent of para no.8 only. Judge Judge |muley|