r— - - ^ 'z HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR PETITIONER W.P(CJ N0.7387 of 2009 Maa Sharda Sahkari Upbhokta Bhandar Maryadit, Pratappur, through its President, Rajesh Garg, Son of Shri Chhabildas Garg, aged about 34 years, Resident of Pratappur, District Surguja (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 1 6 Versus State of Chhattisgahr, through: the Secretary, Food, Civil Supplles and Consumer Protection Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur The Collector, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) The Additional Collector, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Pratappur, Djstrict Surguja (C.G.) The Assistant Food Officer, Pratappur, District Surguja (C.G.) The Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 7 Aadim Jati Seva Sahkari SamJti Pratappur, through its Lamps Manager, District Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITJON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri V.K. Pandey, Counsei forthe petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghaj, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents No.1 to 6. ORALORDER (04.01.2010) SUNILKUMARSINHA.J. Heard finaily with consent of the parties. PetJtioner - Maa Sharda Sahkari Upbhokta Bhandar Maryadit, Pratappur, has filed this petition for the following \ reliefs: ^ W.P(C) N0.7387 of 2009 ^ 10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pieased to issue notices to the respondents returnable within early date of hearing. 10.2 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the appeal vide its appeal No.2007/2008 within stipulated period in accordance with law. 10.3 The Hon'ble Court may kindty be pleased to grant any other ancillary relief, as it may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances ofthe case. 10.4 Cost of the petition. Thus, the petitioner in substance is praying for a direction to respondent No.1 to decide the appeal filed under Clause 18 of the C.G. Publto Distribution System (Control) Order, 2004, which was filed on 16.10.2008 (Annexure P/10) and has not been disposed of by the State till date. Smt. Ghai, learned Panel Lawyer appearing on behalf of the State submits that this petition may be disposed of with a direction to the State to dispose of the appeal by granting reasonable time for the same. Accordingly, the writ petition js disposed of with a djrection that the AppeSlate Authority shall try to dispose of the said pending appeal fiied on 16.10.2008 (Annexure P/10) at the earliest preferable within a period of 4 months from the date of production of certified copy of this order along with the copy of the writ petition. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petitlon stands finally disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge shyna