IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41765 of 2010 01. SUNIL PAUL 02. IGNAS PAUL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitionerS and for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioners 1 and 2 in a Police Case under Sections 324, 307, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, is that the sole firing is attributed to the named accused Santosh Paul and there is no allegation that the petitioners were possessed of or caused any firearm injury. Let the above named petitioners surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Tribeniganj P.S. Case No. 29 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)