IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2066 of 2011. Decided on: 7th April, 2011. Indira Devi. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & anr. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “A. That the writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or direction may kindly be issued quashing the Office Order dated 23.11.2010 passed by respondent No.1 only to the extent whereby the directions have been issued to respondent No.2 to terminate the services of the petitioner. B. That the writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction may kindly be issued directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue on the post of Language teacher in the school.” According to the petitioner, she is similarly situated as the petitioners in Narender Kumar and others vs. State of H.P. and another, CWP No. 8619 of 2010. In case the petitioner is similarly situated as the petitioners in the above mentioned case, a similar treatment shall be given to the petitioner herein also. The needful shall be done within a 2 period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment, referred to above by the petitioner. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 7th April, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr/K) Judge.