IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.10843 OF 2010 Between: Mithra Biotech, Rep. by its Chief Executive Mr. G. Dayakar Reddy .... Petitioner AND The Commissoner & Director of Agriculture of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. .... Respondent HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.10843 OF 2010 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for both sides submitted that the subject matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court dated 14-09-2007 in Writ Petition No.19551 of 2007 and batch. It is also stated that following the same, another Writ Petition No.12149 of 2008 also was disposed of by this Court by an order dated 13-06-2008. 2. Since the subject matter of this Writ Petition is covered by the orders passed in the abovementioned writ petitions, this writ petition is also disposed of with the following directions: (a) It shall be open to the petitioner to submit a sample of 5 kg., of each product dealt with by it, together with the corresponding literature, throwing light upon the manufacturing process as well as the contents thereof, to the respondent herein; (b) Within two (2) weeks from the date of submission of the samples and the literature by the petitioner, the respondent shall get the same analyzed in a suitable laboratory and intimate the result of the analysis, to the petitioner; (c) In case, the analysis reveals that the products dealt with by the petitioner answer the description of the products mentioned in Schedule –II to the Control Order, the petitioner shall be entitled to deal with the products, only after obtaining licence under the Control Order. On the other hand, if the result is found otherwise, the petitioner shall not be subjected to the regime under the Control Order or the Act; and (d) If the respondent fails to intimate the result of the analysis within two (2) weeks from the date of submission of the samples and the literature, it shall be open to the petitioner to deal with the products, notwithstanding the impugned letter and the memo, as long as the products are not insecticides or chemicals. 3. No order as to costs. _______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J May 05, 2010. KTL