IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2011 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 12563 of 2009(M) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. DR.VINNETH KUMAR, PALATHINGAL HOUSE, MANNUMKAAD LANE,CHEROOR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. P.V.MOHANAN,PALATHINGAL HOUSE, MANNUMKAAD LANE,CHEROOR P.O.,THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. K.K.SUSHEELA,PALATHINGAL HOUSE, MANNUMKAAD LANE, CHEROOR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.C.S.AJITH PRAKASH SRI.T.D.SALIM SRI.C.S.YESUDAS SRI.PAUL C THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIYYUR POLICE STATION, VIYYUR,THRISSUR. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,THRISSUR, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,THRISSUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. SATHYAN,PUZHATHI HOUSING COLONY, THANA,KANNUR. R1 & R2 BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.C.M.CHARISMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 12563/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER, DATED 06/04/2009 IN BA.1979/2009, BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT. P2: COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER, DATED 15/04/2009 IN BA.1979/2009, BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT. P3: COPY OF THE PETITION, DATED 16/04/2009 SENT BY REGD. POST, TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P4: COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 16/04/2009. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- WPC No.12563 of 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th March, 2011 JUDGMENT Basant, J. The petitioners are an eligible bachelor and his parents. The first petitioner is alleged to have agreed to marry the daughter of the third respondent. The marriage did not take place for various reasons. The third respondent, an influential person has lodged a complaint before the police. A crime has been registered. Investigation is pending. The petitioners apprehend danger to their lives and person from the third respondent and his men. It is with these allegations that the petitioners came to this Court with this petition. 2. This petition was filed on 20.4.2009. It was admitted on 21.4.2009. The Bench which dealt with the matter on 21.4.2009 issued an interim order, “directing respondents 1 and 2 to see that the life of the petitioners is adequately protected.” 3. After that date, there has been no subsequent wpc No.12563/2009 2 postings. The life of the persons has been adequately protected till now. The matter has come up for hearing today as listed by the Registry along with other long pending unnecessary matters. Respondent No.3 though served has not chosen to enter appearance. 4. We turned to the learned Government Pleader for submissions. The learned Government Pleader submits that in the perception of respondents 1 and 2, there is absolutely no threat to the person or life of petitioners 1 to 3. An interim order was passed on 21.4.2009 and there has been no instance of any untoward incident against the petitioner. In these circumstances, it is not necessary to continue the interim order endlessly. No specific directions under Article 226 are necessary now. If there be any threat to the life of petitioners 1 to 3 at the hands of the third respondent or his men, necessary action shall be taken by the police, if complaint is received, submits the learned Government Pleader. 5. We accept the submissions of the learned Government Pleader. We are satisfied that no further wpc No.12563/2009 3 directions are necessary in this writ petition. 6. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed. R.BASANT JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE css/