IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18901 of 2009 DILIP GUPT, son of Ravindra Gupta @ Baijnath Sah, Resident of Mohalla- Dargah Road, Near Terahe Ki Masjid, P.S.-Sultanganj, District-Patna. …………………. Petitioner Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Rinki Devi, wife of Dilip Gupta, D/o- Ram Babu Sah, at present resident of Mohalla- Begampur, Sidhe Bazar, P.S.-Chauk(Patna City) District- Patna ……………….. Opposite Parties ----------- 2 28.05.2009 The petitioner is the husband and the son-in-law of the complainant respectively, he apprehends his arrest in Complaint Case No. 935 of 2006 instituted under Section 498 (A) I.P.C. read with Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner submits that it is not the wife who is complainant, he believes that the wife is ready and willing to stay with the petitioner who stay separate from his parents. Both the parties are of the same locality and because of undue interference by the complainant mother-in-law and differences in the neighbourhood, the marriage is being pushed to such strained relationship. In may view its a fit case in which privilege of anticipatory bail should be granted because in case, it is rejected and the husband is asked to surrender no self respective person then admit to 2 reconciliate between the parties having been put beyond the bar at the instance of the other side, that would be disastrous. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, the petitioner above named shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M. Patna City in Complaint Case No 935 of 2006 subject to all conditions as laid down in Section 438 (2) of Criminal Procedure Code. Bibhash (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)