IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 22703 of 2004 Between: 1 Smt. Gurrenkala Sivamma W/o.G.Balaiah R/o.1-13, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally, Mandal Ranga Reddy District (A.P.) 2 Smt. Gurrenkala Susheela W/o.Narsimha R/o.1-13, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally, Mandal Ranga Reddy District (A.P.) ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Mandal Revenue Officer Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District. 2 District Collector Ranga Reddy District, Lakdi-ka-Pool Hyderabad. 3 Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ more appropriately a writ of Mandamus to declare in action of respondents particularly 1st and 2nd respondents in correcting the necessary entries in the Pattadar pass books of Petitioners in respect of their land in S.No.166/A of Gopanpally Village as illegal and further direct the respondents to make necessary corrections in the Pattadar Pass Books of the petitioners as Ac .4.26 guntas ie., Ac 2.13 guntas each in S.No.166/A of Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District as per the Registered Sale deed No.1133 of 1982 dt.12.2.1982 forthwith and pass other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.K.RAJANNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court at the admission stage made the following: ORDER: The petitioners claim to be absolute owners of land admeasuring Ac.4.26 guntas in Survey No.166/! situate at Gopanpally village, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.District, having purchased the same vide registered Sale Deed dated 12.02.1982. The petitioners allege that after purchase of the said property, they made an application to the 1st respondent/Mandal Revenue Officer for mutation of their names in the revenue records and pattadar pass books, but the 1st respondent/Mandal Revenue Officer wrongly noted the extent as Ac.4.22 guntas instead of Ac.4.26 guntas in the pattadar pass books. It is further submitted that the petitioners made a representation dated 20.05.2003 to the 1st respondent for correction of entries, but so far the same has not been considered. Hence, the writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. Both the counsel agreed for disposal of the writ petition at the stage of admission. Since the representation of the petitioners dated 20.05.2003 is said to be pending consideration before the 1st respondent, without going into the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent/Mandal Revenue Officer to consider the representation dated 20.05.2003 and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Dated: 24.01.2005 Dsr/Tvk ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To: 1 Mandal Revenue Officer Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District. 2 District Collector Ranga Reddy District, Lakdi-ka-Pool Hyderabad. 3 Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records Ranga Reddy District. 4 Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 5 Two CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MPL}