@ HIGH COURT OF CHHATT1$GARH: BILASPUR Writ Peiitioi} Ea N0. 3402 of 2008 Petitioners 1) Dhanee Ram Nayak, aged about 48 years, scn of Sant Ram Nayak, Assistant Teacher, Government PrimarylMiddle Same}, Gardi ’Mohbhatta, Distt. Raipw (CG), Ramswamp Kaushiég aged aout 6 years, o 0f Shri Ramkushal Kaushék, Assistant Teacher, Gement Primary Schoo, Kcrradih,‘ Dtt. Raipur(CG}. Versus ,) Stafe of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary‘ Department of $chool Education, D Kaiya s ai 2) The District Education Smer aipu, Disit aiur (CG). mgh Bhawan, Rpur (CG). (Wrii Petition under Articfe 22 of the Constétution of iodia) > SB: Hon’bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotr, J. ?set ren: Shri Hemantsmapurkar, couoseforth petitioner. §_iri AYDw/edi Det Govt. Advocate ferthe Ste. ;_) jg‘ii, ggy ta ORAL ORbER Passed n 3*“ day or July, 2003) ( a With consent of ieamd counsei appearing fo bh t parties the tter is he iinaiiy. 2) Learned counsei appeaing for the etitioners as weii as iame cosei appearing for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts and question of Eaw, involved in the present writ petition, are the same asto that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharaowaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Burg and another {2006 iii} MPJR -CG 58}, which has been disposed oi Vida order dated $42606 and the order dated 7-2-1206? passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) ‘N’o. 697 of 2007 (A.N.V. Satyanaiayan and others Vs. State of-Chhattisgarh and others). 3) Aooordingiy, the writ petition is aiiowed in terms oi the order passed in the case oi Yas'nwant Kumar Bhardadwaj (supra) and ANV. Satyanarayan (supra), o b 4 sn ovrn l is Respondems 1 au n a, Rr . Rp 6 i ie e r ot he , ma ard r p ed un subject t0 verification of the fact astc whether BEdfDEdIBTJJMEd. Examinaticm Certm circutars dated 13 the petitioners have acquired cate cn their own expeeses, as per the -9-1 974, 24-12-1998, and 1-3-1 99g and further whether they have xx[A \er 7.x 71 Sdl- / ‘\ /V been paid twc advance increments or not. No order as to oasis. Wy _ satish K Agnihotn Judge k