IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 17TH JANUARY 2008 / 27TH POUSHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 97 of 2008(S) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.24891/2007 .................... PETITIONER : --------------------- ANEESA, AGED 21 YEARS, W/O.NAZEER, KAVINTE PADEETTATHIL, KOMAMPALLI BHAGOM, KAYAMKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.K.JAGADEESH SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------------- K.SUDHEER, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, KAYAMKULAM MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, KAYAMKULAM. BY SC ADV. SRI. RAYA SHENOI. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cont. Case (C) No. 97 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT This court disposed of the writ petition relegating the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy and further directing that the impugned order will be kept in abeyance for two weeks. Complaint in the contempt of court case is that the decision in the appeal is not communicated to the petitioner. I would think that having regard to the judgment delivered, and in respect of which the contempt of court case is filed, absolutely no contempt has been established. Accordingly, the Contempt of Court Case is dismissed. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb