IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36388 of 2008 PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel appearing for the complainant, who has appeared suo motu. The petitioner, who is the husband, apprehends arrest in a complaint case under Sections 498A and other provisions of the Penal Code and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted that only after the petitioner filed a case for divorce within three months of the marriage, the present allegations have been made two months thereafter. Counsel for the complainant does not dispute the submission that he has also entered appearance in the divorce matter, but, submits that she is still desirous for revival of matrimonial harmony. Considering the institution of earlier divorce case and absence of heinous allegation, let the petitioner, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Begusarai in Complaint Case No. 1439 C/06. The aspect of revival of matrimonial harmony is a matter which shall appropriately be kept in mind by the Magistrate during the course of the trial. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)