1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 2984/99 Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli ..versus.. Member, Industrial Court and Another AND Writ Petition No. 2985/99 Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli ..versus.. Member, Industrial Court and Another AND Writ Petition No. 2986/99 Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli ..versus.. Member, Industrial Court and Another =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-== Mr. J.S.Mokadam, counsel for Petitioner Mr. V.N.Morande, counsel for respondent no.2. C ORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 10th AUGUST, 2010. The Employee in Writ Petition No. 2984/99 worked for 151 days, in Writ Petition No. 2986/99, worked for 181 days and in Writ Petition No. 2985/99, worked for 104 days. 2] After substantially arguing the matter and 2 placing reliance to the several judgments, few of them being Jaipur Development Authority vs. Ram [(2006) 11 SCC 684]; M.P.Administration vs. Tribhuwan [(2007) 9 SCC 748] and judgment of the learned Single Judge of this Court concerning backwages in the matter of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Akola, reported in 2008 (2) Mh.L.J. 503, the learned counsel for Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli, on instructions, informs that, all the three employees/respondents in the present writ petitions are brought on Converted Regular Temporary Establishment (CRTE) by Government Resolution dated 4th October, 2001, and consequently they are drawing regular salaries of employee and discharging their duties in the Zilla Parishad. 3] During the course of submissions, the learned counsel representing each of the respondents, on instructions, informs, considering the nature of controversy and the statement made by the learned counsel representing Zilla Parishad, the employees shall not claim the back-wages, though there operates a direction from the Learned Judge, Labour Court, Chandrapur, incluidng continuity. 4] With the above statement, the order under challenge remain unaltered to the extent of reinstatement. It is set aside for payment of back wages 3 and continuity in service. The writ petitions are disposed of as above. Rule partly made absolute. No costs. (K.U.Chandiwal) JUDGE. Rvjalit