1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Writ Petition St. No.5724 of 2008 [Sau. J.V. Gawande Vs. D.O. Chotmal & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. A.K. Choube, Advocate for the petitioner. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 23rd April,2008. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 26th March, 2008 passed by the Collector on application dated 26th March, 2008 which is Annexure-J [page 38], whereby the Collector has rejected petitioner's application seeking time to furnish further evidence. 3. The application does not specify what evidence the petitioner wants to lead. 4. In the oral submissions, learned Advocate has informed this Court that the petitioner wants to lead evidence of the Block Development Officer about evidence received by him. 2 5. The application seeking permission, however, refers to evidence that was brought before the Block Development Officer, and not of his evidence. 6. Did the petitioner have intention to bring the said evidence, she could have procured the certified copies thereof, filed on record, and in the event of dispute, could have moved for summoning the witnesses. 7. In absence of taking any steps, the application, which was randomly submitted expressing intention to bring evidence, does not inspire confidence. 8. Even before this Court, it is not shown as to how the said evidence is relevant. 9. In the circumstances, the petition does not call for any interference. It is, therefore, dismissed. Judge |Hedau|