IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED WRIT PETITION NO : 18807 of 1993 Between: C.Subbalakshmamma W/o.Sidda Reddy, Sanitary Workerin S.V.School for Deaf, TTDs at Warangal R/o.Warangal ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Executive Officer Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 2 The Head Master Sri Venkateswara School for Deaf Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams Hanumakonda, Warangal. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not authorising to the petitioner the regular scale of pay applicable to the post held by the petitioner and not considering her for absorption in TTD service on regular basis as arbitrary, discriminatory unjust and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to absorb the petitioner in TTD service in the existing vacancy with all consequential benefits and in the meanwhile to continue the petitioner in service and pay her in the regular scale of pay applicable to the post held by her. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Respondents : MR.A.K.JAYAPRAKASH RAO The Court made the following : ORDER: This Court by its order dated 25.06.2004, after hearing the learned Counsel for both parties, passed the following order: “Heard. The only grievance of the petitioner is that in spite of the appointment and continuing in service, her case has not been considered. This Court has already granted interim directions in W.P.No.23703 of 1993 for continuing the petitioners in service and the same is still subsisting. Having regard to the same, it is not necessary to go into the merits of the c as e. However, it would suffice the interest of justice to direct the respondents to consider the petitioners case for regularizing her service and pass necessary orders in accordance with law.” In pursuance of the above orders, the respondents issued proceedings dated 24.09.2004 stating that they have examined the case of the petitioner and decided to consider her case for regularization of services as per the rules issued by the Government from time to time, as and when her turn comes. In the above view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition. However, it is made clear that the respondent shall consider the case of the petitioner as stated by them in their proceedings, dated 24-9-2004. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. 25.11.2004 MRKR/KK To 1. The Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 2. The Head Master, Shri Venkateswara School for Deaf Tirumala TirupathiDevasthanams, Hanumakonda, Warangal. 3. Two C.D copies