IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.6346 of 2011 Date of Decision : April 08, 2011. Sudagar Singh .....Petitioner versus Punjab Mandi Board and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Surinder Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is working as a Junior Engineer with additional charge of S.D.O. (Civil) with the respondent-Board. He is aggrieved by his alleged repeated transfers. It is averred that the petitioner has been transferred for five times within a period of one year. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and also having regard to the fact that the transfer is an incidence in service which would ordinarily warrant no interference by a writ Court and as prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation before the respondent- authorities highlighting the mitigating circumstances, if any, and if any such representation is made by him, the competent authority shall consider C.W.P.No .6346 of 2011 2 the same sympathetically and dispose of by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receiving such a representation. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. April 08, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE