1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO.545/2010 IN M.C.A. 4792/2010 JITENDRAKUMAR RUKHMANAND @ SHANKARLAL AGRAWAL & ANOTHER ..VS.. BABULAL SAGARMAL AGRAWAL & ANOTHER Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order . C ORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK,J. DATED : 24/06/2010. Heard Shri A.V. Bhide, the learned advocate for the applicant and Shri Deshpande, the learned AGP for the respondent no.2. None appears on behalf of respondent no.1, though served. Hence for the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 20 days in filing the application to sue as indigent person is condoned. Civil Application is allowed and disposed of. JUDGE M.C.A. STAMP NO.4792/2010 Heard learned counsel for the applicant an the learned AGP for the respondent no.2. 2 By an order dated 27.4.2010, this court had directed the Government Pleader to make an enquiry in regard to the financial condition of the applicant and submit a report. Shri Deshpande, the learned AGP states that the Tahsidlar Arvi has by communication dated 16.6.2010 submitted a report that though the applicant does not have any landed property in Arvi tahsil, he has a two storied house on a land admeasuring 16 x 64 ft and the market value of this property is approximately Rs.10,00,000/-. The communication further states that one of the sons of the applicant is serving in Delhi. The communication dated 16.6.2010 is accepted on record and is marked as Exhibit ‘Z’. The communication dated 16.6.2010 clearly shows that the applicant is not a pauper and hence would not be entitled to file the appeal in forma-pauparis. M.C.A. is therefore, dismissed. Applicant is granted 4 weeks time to deposit the court fees, as a last chance. JUDGE SMP