wp2007.10 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2007 OF 2010 Ankush s/o Trimbak Chavan ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents ..... Mr. Anand V. Patil, advocate for the petitioner Mr. V.B. Ghatge, AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 4 Mr. V.A. Dhakane, advocate for respondent Nos. 5 and 6. ..... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 4TH JULY, 2011 PER COURT:- 1 We have noted in our order dated 30.3.2011 that the petitioner does not desire to press prayer “C” in view of the alternate remedy available to the petitioner before the Divisional Social Welfare Officer. 2 We had directed the learned AGP to inform us as to whether an Administrator has been appointed in respect of respondent No.6 school. The learned AGP points out an order passed by the Secretary, Social Justice Department on 30.3.2011, which was wp2007.10 -2- communicated to him by letter dated 21.4.2011 by the Special District Social Welfare Officer. By this order, the State has decided not to appoint an Administrator in respect of respondent No.6 school, after conducting an enquiry. 2 In view of this order, prayer “D” sought by the petitioner for appointment an Administrator has already been considered by the State and has become infructuous. 3 The petition is therefore dismissed. The petitioner is relegated to avail of the alternate remedy in approaching the Divisional Social Welfare Officer in respect of prayer “C” in the petition. The order passed by the Social Justice Department may be challenged, if so advised, by the petitioner, before the appropriate forum. 4 The petition is rejected. ( M. T. JOSHI, J.) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) rlj/