.ai<! •r> l^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.1 ~733 QF 2005 PETITIONERS DEFENDANTS 1. Kalashashi Bishwas, son of Sudhanna, aged about 45 years, ' resident of - Bayasi Colony, 1 Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (DEAD1 / a7WA^7 .. ..^\ 1.1 Smt Gyanoda, widow of Late •/ y^--" y^ Kalashashi Bishwas, aged about ^* 70 years ( D EAD ) ^ .J \^~/. ^y/^ /^ / ^'y.45 w~ ^p fk. w" •" '" ^/^, ^''-.,. /-- .. f.r^ft- „. ••" ' ' -^ \ 1.2 §ushil Kumar, aged about 55 years, son of Kalashashi, 1.3 Smt. Kutorani, wife of Mangal Choudhari, aged about 52 years, 1.4 Sunil Kumar, son of Kalashashi (DEAD) THROUGH - LEGAL HEIRS 1. Smt Malati, widow of Late Sunil Kumar, aged about 42 years, resident of Bayasi Colony, 2. Seema, daughter of Surril Kumar, aged about 32 years, ^r'^-iKi^i—..^ 3. Sushma, daughter of Sunil Kumar, aged about 30 years, 4. Sulabha, daughter of Sunil Kumar, aged about 28 years, 5. Sheela aged about 26 years, dadghterdf Sunil Kumar 6. Basudeo, aged about 22 years, son of Sunil Kumar, 7. Asha, daughter of Sunil Kumar, aged about 20 years, SI.No, 1, 6 and 7 are resident of Bayasi Colony. Sl. No. 2 & 3 are resident of Durgapur Colony. ^ I^SI. NJ0.4 R/o Dhavainyiiga^Colon^: Rojga^. Sl. No. 5 resident of Rajpur, Tah. Lailunga, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) s^ ^^f- ^^' s"1 ^•1 - 1.5 Smt Jankirani, widow of Nakul, aged about 45 years, 1.6 Nikhil Kumar son of Shri Kalashashi Bishwas, aged about 42 years, /1.7 Badal Kumar, son of. -Shri Kalashashi Bishwas, aged about 40 years, lo ^ 1.8 Amal Kumar, son of Kalashashi Bishwas, aged about 38 years, 51. No. (1.1 , 1.2, 1.4 to 1.8) are resident of Baisi Colony, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, Distt. , Raigarh. 'SI.No. 1.3, resident of Bangali Colony, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS PLAINTIFFS / Kalipad Bishwas, son of Shri Ananda Bishwas, aged about 12 years (Minor) through next friend - Surendra Mandal, son of Yadava Mandal, resident of Baisi, Punarvas Colony, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (DEAD1 THROUGH : LEGAL HEIRS !^^^tuai;ia.^t»»aia*t XI-HC-22 V sn^rqiT f^TRiW^T aitii^uled 'sss •^nw^, vs^ww, Ridi'yy 3TT^?rq^^i ^^.^.Al.^.l; HT(T?tT'9><ncfi 200p^ 3:n^r?TcnWBfer 06.05.2005 Shri AN Bhakta, couns^ Shrl Panka) Shrtvastaval Heard on admisskxi interim relief. In CM1 suit No.l-A/9^, vide Order dated 21.02.2003 ] names and acklresses of all party before Supreme Court order has been challenged ln| constitutton of tndia. During the argument grie'reince in incorporating the| From the averment annexed with it, it is dear Bishwas had died and in the names of his legat shown to be contesting N0.7297Q002 in Supreme Taking into account 1he| commit any iltegal'rty or irregul|i +l'i|f<-l41-l ?TR5Jffffai<;l <Rl+dK. ^isrf^Tsn^r for ttie petttteners. <f Panel tawyer for the State. M.(W.)P.No.1403/2005 (or grant crf arld }, Chril Judge Cfass I, Dharamjaygarh, |dir»tedthe plaintlff to incorporate the t|ie parties who were shcwn to be the |in concemed Civll Appeal. The said this p^itlon under Artlcle 227 of the tl-le (wtitioner contencted that he has no nam^ of teg^\ heirs of the (tefendant. coi|italned In the peUtion and documents the plainUff/respondent Kalipad before the Hon'ble Hlgh Court were brought , who were in Uie cause titte of Civil Appeal that procjeedings repr^sentatives pany !C<turt. said fact teamed lower Court cb'd not irregul|arity, whkdi requires any correcfion or XI-HC-22 \ sn^rqii f^iwan^T sh*<i+tiRd u! padma 3^? •^l'illl-i^, ®^U'16,Rldltiy 5Tq?rai «fTOMI'ai»l(cti 3<1^1 ^WIW^cT modificaUon, hence the imp^ interference. Therefore, th^ dismissed. Accordingty, M.(W.] °bl'i|t<?)'Ifl.f t||t<c)Tfffec^<Rlt<i;K ^iarf^Tsn^r igned wder does not call for any p^tion frted ty the pdltioner is P.No.140af20(B is disposed of. Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge