1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 433 OF 2007 IN IN SUIT NO. 323 OF 2006 Aristo Realty Developers Ltd. ...Plaintiffs. Vs. Rama Shashikant Mehta and Ors. ...Defendants. AND Mrs. Jigna Prakash Shah ...Respondent. Mr.Rajesh Maravoor i/by M/s. Maravoor Wamorkar & Co. for the Plaintiffs. Ms. V.Mirasee i/by M/s. Shah & Sanghavi for the defendant No. 3 to 6. Ms. Reena Salunkhe for defendant NO. 1 & 2. CORAM : A.A.SAYED, J. DATE : JUNE 16, 2009. P.C. 1. Learned Counsel for defendant No. 1 & 2 and the learned Counsel for defendant Nos. 3 to 6 have no objection if the Chamber Summons of the plaintiffs is allowed. 2. Chamber Summons is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today. Amended copy of the plaint and proceedings be served upon the defendants. 3. Chamber Summons to stand disposed of. [A.A.SAYED, J.] 2