IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 340 of 2010 Date of decision: 22.11.2010 Kamlesh Kumari …. Petitioner Versus Shakuntala Devi. ….. Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting? No For the petitioner: Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr.Ajay Sharma, Advocate. _____________________________________________ Deepak Gupta, J.(Oral) 1. Sh.Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the prayer for setting aside the order dated 24.6.2010. His only prayer is that the learned Trial Court be directed to decide the application filed by the petitioner under Order 9 Rule 13, CPC at the earliest. In case any such application under Order 9 Rule 13, CPC is pending, the learned Trial Court shall make an effort to decide the same at the earliest. Interim order dated 24.6.2010 is vacated. The parties through their 2 counsel are directed to appear before the learned Executing Court on 3.1.2011. 2. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. November 22, 2010 ( Deepak Gupta ) (m) Judge