^^ v^ HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR CRIIVIINAL REVISION N0.546 of 2011 APPUCANT RESPONDENT Krishnachand Malik, S/o Panu Malik, aged about 17 years, Through Natural Guardian (Father) Panu Malik S/o Baisakhu, aged 42 years R/o Chergajhanj, P.S. Pikemaal, Tahsil-Paik, District Bargarh (Orissa) Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through P.S. Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.) CRIMINAL REVISION UNDER SECTION 53 OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE (CARE AND PROTECTION OF CHILDRENi ACT. 2000 Appearance: Mr. Vikas Pradhan, Counsel forthe applicant. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (20.10.2011) v SUNfL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that during the pendency of this revision, the applicant/juvenile has been released on bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., therefore, he is not pressing this revision. The revision is, therefore, dismissed, as not pressed. Suni^^rstaba Judge t^-