IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 17708 of 2005 Between: Vidyanjali Educational Society (Regd) Kaikalur Krishna District, Rep by its Secretary/Correspondent Sri Ala Vinay Kumar Reddy, S/o. A. Chinna Reddy, aged 37 years, R/o. Kaikalur, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P. State Council of Higher Education, Masab Tank, Opp : Mahaveer Hospital, Hyderabad, Rep by its Secretary 2 The Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur rep by its Registrar 3 Vikas Educational Society, Lokamudigaruvu Village, Mandavalli Mandal, Krishna District, rep by its Secretary/ Correspondent Sri Veera Venkateswar Rao, S/o. Veera Venkata Rao, aged 30 years. 4 Vignan Educational Society, Eluru Road, Kaikalur Village & Mandal, Krishna District, rep by its Secretary Correspondent Sri Pandu Ranga Rao, S/o. Appala Narasaiah, aged about 45 years. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a direction or an order, or a writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st respondent in giving permission to the respondents 3 and 4 to start new degree colleges more particularly to the 3rd respondent under Proceedings No. APSCHE/SECRY/NDC-288/ANU-35/2005-06, dt.27-6- 2005 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional as it is violation of the norms and rules laid down under the Educational Code, consequently set-aside the proceedings No. APSCHE/SECRY/NDC-288/ANU- 35/2005-06, dt.27-6-2005 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.S.BHATT Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1&2: GOVT. PLEADER FOR HIGHER EDUCATION. Counsel for the Respondent No.3: MR. O.MANOHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.4: MR. Y.RAMARAO. The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:24th June, 2009. cs ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}