IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46458 of 2009 1. GAUTAM KUMAR 2. Amar Sahni 3. Pintu Sahni Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 01.02.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application of petitioner no.2, inasmuch as he has been arrested during the pendency of the application. Such permission is accorded. Accordingly, the application of petitioner no.2 is dismissed as withdrawn. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Recently a case was lodged against informant’s party. Injuries are found simple caused by hard and blunt substances. Demand of Rangdari and theft are disbelieved at the stage of cognizance, even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest which can never be justified. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner nos. 1 and 3 is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Kadamkuan P.S. 2 Case No. 278 of 2009, above named petitioner nos. 1 and 3 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Patna subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)