IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WPCRL No. 633 of 2008 Satish Kumar and another ……….. Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …………… Respondents Mr. S. Dhulia, learned Senior Counsel with Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Government Advocate for the respondent State. Mr. Sanjeev Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3. JUDGMENT Hon’ble V. K. Gupta, C.J. After hearing the detailed arguments of Mr. S. Dhulia, learned Senior Counsel with Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate, I feel totally disinclined to interfere in the matter in exercise of this Court’s jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petition is dismissed. However, the bail application be heard and disposed of on the same day it is filed. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 11.8.2008 Avneet