1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1018 OF 2009 Sau. Mumtaj Tabrej Halgeri & Ors. ...Petitioners. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.S.S.Deshmukh,adv. For the Petitioners. Ms.S.V.Gajare, APP for the Respondent No.1/State. Mr.Indrajeet Joshi, adv. For the Respondent No.2. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : JUNE 16, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. It appears that the respondent/complainant was in need of money and the petitioners/accused approached him to purchase their property. Complainant agreed to sell the property to the accused for the consideration of Rs.2,20,000/-. Amount of Rs.20,000/- was paid to him and standing loan of Rs.2 lacs in his name was to be re-paid by the accused. On these terms, the sale deed was got executed and registered but later on, accused persons failed to pay full loan amount of Rs.2 lacs and paid only one lac and thus, according to the complainant, they had cheated him. On their complaint, J.M.F.C. Kolhapur directed enquiry under Section 202 of the Cr.P.C. and after enquiry issued process under 2 different sections. That process is sought to be quashed by this petition. 2 Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances, I do not find it to be a fit case to quash the proceeding. 3 Petition stands dismissed. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)