^, Writ Peti'lion No. 352 of Z'COa Petitioner Pyars Lai Yadav, aged 2S ysars, son of Shri Mangal Yadav, Up-sarpanch, Gra'm Panchayat Kumharikaia, P.O.Sarhar, vi Baradwar, Biock Bamhanjdih, Tehsu Charnpa, Dlstrict Jaiijgii'-ChaiTtF (Chhattisaarn). Versus iespondents 1) Siats of Chhattlsaarh. throuah the Sscretar/, Panchayat Dapartmeni, ipur. 2. TheDirelctor(Panchayat),Raipur(Ci3). 3) The D'strict CoiJector, Janjgir-Champa, Janjgir (Chhatiisgarh). 4) The Sub Dsvisfona! Officer (Revenue), janjgir, District Jarygir-Champa (CQ). 5) Superintendent of Poiica, .Janjgir, Districi Janjgir-Champa (CG). S) Ramphai Chauhan, Sarpanch, Gram Psnchsv^t Kuimh^riksl^. Hl Bamnanidin, Uistncs Janjgir-Ur (CG). 7) Ram Gopai Karsh, Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Kumharikaia, Block Bamhanidih, Di.strict Janjgir-Champa ff^ ?"^\ ^•\s1^, (Writ Petition under Articte 226/227 of Constitution of India) -lon'bie iVlr. Sat;sh K. Afinjhotri, J. Prsssnt^ Mr. Soninath Vsrma. coiins©lfof th9 D©t!tlon©f. Mr. A.S. Kashhawaya, Deputy Advocate General for the resoondsnts No. 1 to 5/State. None for the respondents No. 8 and 7 dessite servfee of notlce. [Passed on this 4"' day ot December 200S Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seaks permission of this Court to wlthdraw this petition on the ground that this petition has beconie infructuous, to 'n'hich iearned counse! appearing for the Slate has no objeciion. 2) it is ordered as orayed ror. 3) Accordinely, the petition is dismlssed as wittidrawn as havina becoms infructuous. Consecjuentiv, M.W.P.No.283 of 2006 also stands disrnissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge