IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31974 of 2008 1. RAM NATH YADAV 2. Sandesh Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 2. 4.8.2008 Heard. The renewal prayer is on the ground that the victim who has been examined in the trial has neither identified the petitioners nor named them in his evidence as his abductors or captors. Considering the statement of the victim, annexure-3 in that behalf, let the above named two petitioners be directed to be released from custody on their furnishing bonds each of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court Vth, Bettiah, in Sessions Trial No. 326 of 1995 arising out of Nautan P.S. Case 125 of 1993. The present order shall be on the following conditions: (i) that the petitioners shall remain physically present on each and every date to be fixed by the trial court 2 even after no progress could be made, and (ii) the absence of the petitioners must be supported by a reasonable ground and documents in that behalf. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)