IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 14621 of 2009 Between: 1 Smt. Rani Bai W/o. Late Sri Thakur Bal Ram Singh, Alias T. Bala Ram Singh, 68 yrs Occ: Housewife, R/o. 16-2- 147/3/2A (380) Dayanand Nagar, Malakpet, Hyderabad. 2 T. Pushkar RajSIngh S/o. lateSri Thakar BalRam SIngh Alias T. Bala Ram Singh, 37 yrs Occ: Service, R/o. 16-2-147/3/2A (380) Dayanand Nagar, Malakpet, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep.by the Principal Secretary to Government Revenue (Endowments.II/1) Department A.P. Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by the Deputy Commissioner Endowments Department, Boggulkunta Hyderabad. 3. K.Ashok Kumar R/o.H.No. 12-1-106/1,Asif Nagar Hyderabad. 4. L.Ramana Reddy S/o. P.KrishnaReddy R/o.B 16/1,Karolbagh,Mehidipatnam Hyderabad. 5. Y. AjanthaRani W/o.Y.Ananda Reddy R/o.5-9-22/44, Adarsh Nagar, Hyderabad. 6. Y.Ananda Reddy S/o. AdinarayanaReddy R/o.5-9-22/44, G1, Adarsh Nagar, Hyderabad. 7. G. Chandra Sekhar S/o. G. Balanarayana R/o. D3/75, Shanti Shikhara Apartments, Raj Bhawan Road,Hyderabad. 8. The Assistant Commissioner Endowments Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh Bogulkunta,Tilak Road,Hyderabad. 9. Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple Devilnikunta, Rep. by Its SingleTrustee E.Sham Sundar,Humayun Nagar, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction preferable in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the 1st respondent in not passing orders in Revision petitions filed by the petitioners dt. 19-7-2006 referred to in its Memo No. 39927/Endts. II(1)/2004 dt. 30-11-2006 at Ref. Nos. (2) and (3) on par with the orders dt.16-6-2009 already passed by him in the Revision petition of the3rd Respondent dt. 28-10-2004 is arbitrary illegal, unjust and further pray to direct the 1st Respondent to pass orders in Revision petitions of the petitioners dt. 19-7-2006 pending before him. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.MANIK RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.14621 of 2009 Order: The main grievance of the petitioners in this writ petition is that though the first respondent-Government has heard the revision petitions, dated 19.07.2006, filed by them against the orders, dated 09.05.2006, passed by the Regional Joint Commissioner, Endowments Department, MZ-III, Hyderabad in R.P.Nos.20 and 21 of 2006, along with another revision petition, dated 28.10.2004, filed by the third respondent herein, relating to the same subject matter, on similar grounds, and reserved for orders, through its order, dated 16.06.2009, the first respondent allowed the revision petition preferred by the third respondent and kept pending the revision petitions preferred by them. Hence, they filed the present writ petition seeking appropriate directions in this regard. At the time of hearing, the learned Government Pleader for Endowments, on instructions, submitted that the matters are still pending and that the first respondent would dispose of the revision petitions preferred by the petitioners in due course. In the circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits, the writ petition is disposed of, at the admission stage, directing the first respondent-Government to consider the revision petitions preferred by the petitioners and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, expeditiously, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 29.07.2009 VGB