IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1821 OF 2005 Shri Shrikant Vijay Birmal ...Applicant Versus Maharashtra State Electricity Board & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.M.S.Mohite for Applicant. None for Respondent No.1. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. APRIL 13, 2005. APRIL 13, 2005. APRIL 13, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. The controversy in this Application can be resolved by directing the Applicant to appear before the concerned Magistrate and complying with the formalities of furnishing surety and bond in response to the bailable warrant issued by the : 2 : appropriate Court against the Applicant. Learned A.P.P. fairly accepts that such a course is permissible in law. 3. Accordingly, this Application is disposed of with the above direction, provided, the Applicant take steps to comply with the necessary formalities within one week from today. 4. I am disposing of this matter on the assumption that the course indicated above will be acceptable to Respondent No.1, who is not before the Court. In case, the Respondent No.1 has any grievance regarding this order, it will be open to the Respondent No.1 to approach this Court for appropriate relief, as may be advised. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.