IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 21294 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision: May 18, 2010. Niranjan Singh and others. ...... PETITIONERS Versus State of Haryana and others. ...... RESPONDENTS CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.M.Anand, Addl.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Ranjiwan Singh, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 10. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking direction for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 10. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. In reply filed on behalf of respondent – State it has been admitted that petitioner Nos.3 and 4 have married. However, it has been CRM No.M-21294 of 2009 stated that private respondents have given statement that they does not want to interfere in the married life of petitioner Nos.3 and 4. However, it has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are not being allowed to enter the village by private respondents and they have not been allowed to live peacefully in their house. Hence, in view of these facts, respondents No.1 to 3 are directed to assess the threat perception to the life and liberty of petitioners and to protect the life and liberty of petitioners, a right which is available to every citizen of India under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) May 18, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2