BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. TAMILVANAN CRL OP(MD) No.14395 of 2011 G.NATARAJ : PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.5 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GUJILIAMPARAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. CRIME NO.221 OF 2011 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.PERUMAL Advocate For Respondent : Mr. K.S.DURAIPANDIAN Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused No.5 as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (criminal side) appearing for the respondent. 2. The petitioner, who is arrayed as A5 facing charges for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No.221 of 2011, on the file of the respondent-police, has come forward with this application seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the de-facto complainant lodged a complaint before the respondent police against the petitioner and 4 others. He further submits that the de-facto complainant contested in the Local Body Election and he lost in the election with the brother-in-law of the petitioner. After the results were announced, the de-facto complainant wanted to take revenge on the petitioner's brother-in-law, who was his rival in the said election. He further submits that the petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged commission of offence and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent has not disputed the fact that the petitioner is working as a Headmaster in a Higher Secondary School. He further submits that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioner, I find it just and reasonable to grant anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur and on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the Chinthamanipatti Police Station, Karur District, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed. sd/- 08/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VEDASANDUR. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GUJILIAMPARAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 5. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHINTHAMANIPATTI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. V.PERUMAL Advocate SR.No.38354 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14395 of 2011 Date :08/11/2011 NSV/11.11.11/2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/