1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE REVIEW APPLICATION (ST) NO. 21408 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 6001 OF 2000 MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION. .. APPLICANTS Versus RAVINDRA KUMAR G. SHINDE & ORS... RESPONDENTS Mr. G. S. Hegde with C. M. Lokesh for applicants Mr. C.K. Bhangoi i/b R.K. Mendadkar for petitioner Mr. C. R. Sonawane, AGP for R-1,2 & 4 CORAM:-SMT. RANJANA DESAI & D. B. BHOSALE, JJ. DATED:-8/6/2007 P.C. . We have heard the learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. In the circumstances of the case, in our opinion, the order requires to be slightly modified. The 1st sentence in paragraph 4 shall now read as under: 2 . "However, as observed by the committee, if the petitioner is found eligible and/or entitled to protection of the Government Resolution dated 15/6/95 and, if he is found suitable his services cannot be terminated only on the ground that he does not belong to Scheduled Tribe and his certificate belonging to that category is invalidated." 3. With this modification of the order, review application is disposed of. JUDGE. JUDGE. 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 639 OF 2007 IN REVIEW APPLICATION (ST) NO. 21408 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 6001 OF 2000 MHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION. .. APPLICANTS Versus RAVINDRA KUMAR G. SHINDE & ORS... RESPONDENTS Mr. G.S. Hegde with C. M. Lokesh for applicants Mr.C.K.Bhangoi i/b R.K. Mendadkar for petitioner Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP for R-1,2 & 4 CORAM:-SMT. RANJANA DESAI & D. B. BHOSALE, JJ. DATED:-8/6/2007 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. . For the reasons stated in the application delay 4 is condoned. Application is disposed of. JUDGE. JUDGE.