Civil Revision No.4260 of 2010(O & M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4260 of 2010(O & M) Date of Decision:13.07.2010 Gurdev Singh .... petitioner Versus Hardev Singh .....respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? 4. Present: Mr.Sanjay Gupta,Advocate for the petitioner **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): This is defendant's revision petition challenging the impugned orders whereby application for ad interim injunction in favour of the plaintiff-respondent has been allowed. The only grouse of the petitioner before this court is that while passing the impugned order, the Additional District Judge, Ropar has made some observations which amounts decision on the merits of the appeal pending before him and the same were not warranted. However, a perusal of the impugned order would show that while allowing the appeal, the Lower Appellate Court has clearly stated that any observation made in the impugned order shall have no bearing on the merits of the main case. In view of the aforesaid observations, the contention raised Civil Revision No.4260 of 2010(O & M) 2 by the petitioner is frivolous. No other point was urged. Revision petition stands dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 13.07.2010 neenu