IN THE Ci3URT OF STATE ADNENXSTRATI‘VE TREBUNAL BENCH, RAIPUR q’ CG.) w 2/ v @W X 5" ) // ORIGINAL APPLICAHONNO. /200f Shri J . K. Nayak S/o Shri Mbfilal Nayak . Age~ about 35 years Agtt. Teachgr , M.S. Khorigozm ‘ Blo¢k —Baramkela , Tahsil - Saxangarh. Distt. Raigarh ( C. G. ). l'émm' WWjF-f‘ U 1. Secretary, through Chhattisgarh govt. Schooi Educatimx depazimem, 11K. Bhawan, Raipur ( CG. ) Baspandem‘ : 2. Collector , Raigarh ( C,G. ) 3. Disit. E(1txcati0n Officer, Raigarh (CG) AyyLmAHON Ufs. 19 OF M.P.STAm ‘Axymsmm TRIBUNAL ACT. HIGH COUR! OF QgHATTi§GAR M QILASEQR WP. (S) No. 3781 oi 2005 g, SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Saiish K. Agnihotri, J Shri H. K. Sahu , Advocate for the petitioner. V. V. S. Murthy, Deputy Advocate Generar with Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Gcvt. Advocate for the respondents/State. .1. O R D E R (Passed on this 9‘” day or Mam, 2007) The fouowing order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri. J. 1. The petitioner whiie working as Assisiant Teacher in Primary School. Khorigaon, District — Raigarh was transferred to Primary School. Lendhra, on the same terms and conditions. vide order dated 31.7.2001 (Annexure N1). 2. The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Raipur vide interim order dated 14.9.2001 directed to maintain status quo in regard to the position of the petitioner as it was prevailing on 13.9.2001. By virtue of the interim order the petitioner is continuin§ at the original piace of posting. Be that as it may, with the paseage of time this petition has become infructuous as period of transfer is not appiicabte forever. At this point of time there is no question to examine the vaiidity of the transfer order. However, the respondents are at liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in View the pubtic interest and administrative exigency, without insisting on compiiance of the impugned transfer order 4. it is weil settled principle of law that transfer rs an Incrdent of servrce and it is for the employer to decide as to where a particular offcerlemployee be posted‘ keeping In View public interest as well as administrative eXigency This court has limited iurisdiction to interfere in the transfer matter and this Court can interfere only in the case of proved maiahde, non-competence of authority passing the transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity with the rules and reulations. 5. in view ofthe above. this petition stands’disposed of. No order as to costs. og - - 1 ~ Sdl— Satish K Agn1hotr1 Judge ‘ ,. Thakur l Petitioner J. K. Nayak Respcndents