IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.242 of 2007 SANJAY YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4. 18.5.2009. Heard. This revision application has been directed against the order dated 20.12.2006 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bihar Sharif, Nalanda in Maintenance Case No.21(M) of 2004, whereby it had directed to pay a sum of Rs.800/ per month to opposite party no.2 as maintenance from 4.1.2004. In the instant case, vide order dated 18.4.2007, notice was issued to opposite pasty no.2. On 18.8.2007, this court called for the lower court records and the impugned order was stayed. Mr. Anjani Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that opposite party no.2 and the petitioner are living together and they are present in court also. Learned counsel for the opposite party does not expressly deny the aforesaid position. He submits that he does not have any instruction in this regard. As the opposite party no.2 is living with 2 her husband, this court does not find it necessary to interfere with the impugned order passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court. However, in case, if at any time, the petitioner neglects or does not maintain his wife, it would be open to the opposite party no.2 to file an appropriate application for enforcing the aforesaid order passed in the maintenance case. With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed off. ahk (S.P.Singh,J.)