1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5862 OF 2009 Mr. Balbir Singh S/o. Sant Singh Nanra. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents. ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 441 OF 2010 Tejinder Singh S/o. Gurdip Singh. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. M.M. Saraogi for the Applicant. Mrs. P.P. Bhosle, APP for the State. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 02 FEBRUARY 2010. P.C. :- Leave to amend to include names of the other relatives of the Applicants, who have been made parties to the Application. 2. The proceedings are under Domestic Violence Act. However, after negotiations and discussions, the husband and wife have decided to end all the differences and disputes and reside together. Both are present in Court. Both confirmed that they have no grievance against each other. The Original Complainant/Respondent No.2 – Wife is present and states 2 that she has no subsisting grievance even against the in-laws and would have no objection if all proceedings under the said Act are quashed by this Court in its inherent jurisdiction. 3. Finding that the continuation of the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of the Court, more particularly, once the husband and wife have decided to come together, interest of justice would be served if Application No. 5862 of 2009 is allowed and the proceedings being Case No. 307/N/2009 pending before the 52nd Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Kurla are quashed and set aside, so also in Application No. 441 of 2010, FIR No. 122 of 2009, registered under the Provisions of Section 498A, 406, 506 r/w. 34 of I.P.C. is quashed. The Applications are allowed in these terms. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)