w&'"' W Vf. '^<'\ :4^ ^f -§.»°> INTKBHI®HCQiyKTQFiIIJ®IGATI?REATBII,ASPITR •;':'^:;'vl":^t<SHHA^IS<^imi::^.-;: • ;1" :,^':': : WRIT PEllTIQNNo. ^63^^^^^^/ PETITIONER 1. Raoikuwar , aged abqut 66 }?earsW/o Late RamdhatEfB5CCasteGond,R/ff ¥iM:age'FHoFaTah.Pend!!a?Eao<I 2. SitaBal aged al)out 30 years W/o'RajendiaSingl^t%eSi^l3y ^;^^ Sarpanctt R/o yUtage Deorikurud Tah. I'endra Raod Distt. Bilaspur. VERSUS RESPONDENTS i/^"^ •^eW / f^s^ f^ \^^oy ../'^<3(?&<a>'^ .yy ^^ y^ <-'.«^"./- 1. TheState ofChhattisgarh, Ttirough Secretary, Panchayat and RiiralDepartiiienf,D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2. Director OfPanchayat, 3. Asstt... CoUectbr PendFa RaQd, Distt. Bilaspur /- •'... ' • :• . ' ' '. •••..: •'• ..'•*"• 4. Sub Divisipnal Qfficer (Revenu<^ Pendra Raod, Distt. @ilaspi.lr . 5., -AnsilitiyaBai,:^:. ":!'.' ^ .' ,,,':. Village De6rikurud,/Tah. Pendra Raod, Distt. Bilaspur WRITPETITm KIBI%^i< g^:bE;:22&!3<iN» 'CONSTIT' g[>IO; ;:'Ql>^t»DtA.''-':'l;:'.": :~ .'•'-:••," Particular 6fatli,e"l*etiii0ne;r.;- As menfioned alidve in'l^ cau As iaeii^nedJaifc't3ifeGa'iis& fitle. ^I^rtlenlars'ioffiMBSalacd^Saliainst^wliit^ IIBI UiBS ''^SS^^SS^^St SD^t^I f?;iH;3iii?i '^lNi' •^Iid 5l9f wwss^.- SL-w\ Sc-J'M^J- •s^ •^sFSRn, ~s€twre,iiiwK-iy u ?,fJ^)'?^}^M^ sni^rTOiiw^ifta 23,01,2004 coitnsel Padel R^ipi Shri Parag Kotecfaa, Shri Akhi1 Agarwal, Heard. The petitioners have 226/227 offhe Constitution dated 14.01.2004 (Annexure i.e., Director of Panchayat, vacated the stay order dated Additional Commlssioner, tUl Leamed counsel for fht Director of Pauchavat has dated 15/03/2003 passcd tfae appeal is stiU pending. / Haviag heard thc regard to fhe facts and Director of Panchayat, Raipiijr appeal, it would be approprial Raipur to decide thc appeal Therefore, the Direcfor of fhe appeal itself wifhm a receipt ofcopy ofthis order. With fhe aforesaid obj petition staads disposed of. and I.A.NO.461/2004 also Pardes are entitled for ct leam^d stafad ^il^'f^ 'HR^f^ 1^t^ •(P>lt$l< ^T 3rfS(Tq-sn^i for ftie petitioner. Lawyer for the State. prtferred this writ petition under Ai-dcle |of India being aggrieved by fhe order p-10) passed by tbe respondent No.2 R^ipur, by which learaed Difcctor has 115/03/2002 which was passed by ftie PIC decision of fhe appeal. petitioner subruits that fhe leamed pa^sed fhe order vacating fhe stay oider byl the Additional CoimiussiDner though counsel for the parties and haviag cutl-um.stan.ces of fhc case, as leamed ipiijr had vacated that stay pendiag fhe |je to direct the Director ofPaachayat, ptsetf wifhin a period of one inouth. Pat^chayat, Raipur is directed to decide pei^od of one nionfh froin fhe date of .ervations and directions, this writ Consequently, M.W.P.No. 154 f 2004 disposed of. ;rtified copy oftfais order. Sd/- LC.Bhadoo Judge