IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8562 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE N.N.MATHUR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? No. 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No. J 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? No. 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? No. 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? No. -------------------------------------------------------------- PREMJIBHAI NATHABHAI GOHIL Versus STATE OF GUJAAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR CH VORA for Petitioner MR YS MANKAD for Respondent No. 1,3 and 4. MISS HARSHA DEVANI, A.G.P. for respondent no.2. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE N.N.MATHUR Date of decision: 08/05/96 ORAL JUDGEMENT Rule. Mr. Y.S. Mankad, learned Advocate waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondents no.1, 3 and 4. Miss Harsha Devani, learned A.G.P. waives service of notice of rule for respondent no.2. 2. Learned Counsel for the parties submit that this matter is identical to Special Civil Application No.8239 of 1995 decided on 26-4-1996. 3. For the reasons stated and conclusions arrived at in the aforesaid judgment in Sp. C.A. No.8239/95 dated 26-4-1996 the present Special Civil Application is allowed and the respondent Bhuj Nagarpalika is directed to consider the entire matter sympathetically in its right perspective if the petitioner make a representation within a period of 4 weeks from today. If representation is made within the period of 4 weeks, the same shall be decided within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. 4. Rule made to the aforesaid extent. No order as to cost. -0-0-0-0-0-