IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5317 of 2010 PRAMOD MANDAL,son of Shri Bishun Deo Mandal Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 23-02-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 392, 395/411 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the FIR but subsequently on suspicion his house was raided and certain articles were recovered from his house which was purportedly not the subject matter of the case. However they were not identified by any of the witness. There are altogether eight witnesses in the case, out of them only three witnesses have been examined and the petitioner is in custody since 02.12.2007. Under the circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-Ist, Supaul in connection with S.T.No.121 of 2008, arising out of Birpur (Balua) P.S.Case No.146 of 2007, subject to the conditions (a) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (c) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (e) that the petitioner will be well represented on each 2 date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. AH/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )