:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2682 OF 2006 Ratanlal Motilal Agarwal ...Applicant Versus Gopi Krishna Ramgopal Garg and Ors. ....Respondents Mr.R.A.Thorat Adv. for the petitioners. P.S.Dani Adv. for respondent nos.1 and 2. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 11th January, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. This Civil Application prays for extension of time to vacate the suit premises. :2: :2: :2: 2. The petitioner had filed a Writ petition which was dismissed by this court. The order of dismissal was passed on 9.2.2007. This court protected the possession of the petitioner applicant for three months. Thereafter, the petitioner approached the Supreme Court and the Hon’ble Supreme Court has also dismissed the petition as well as the Review petition. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant, would urge that pursuant to the liberty of the supreme Court this civil application is preferred. 4. The said premises are commercial premises. The suit is filed in the year 1999 and the decree is on the ground of unlawful subletting, acquisition of alternate premises and arrears of rent. The suit is decreed and even the Appeal therefrom is dismissed by the lower appellate court on 24.2.2006. 5. Considering that the premises are commercial and the extension granted by this court earlier protecting the petitioner’s possession, there is no reason to grant any further protection. Application dismissed. :3: :3: :3: No order as to costs. sd/- *******