1 wp1511.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1511 OF 2011 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. P.V. Barde, advocate for the petitioner. 1. Heard Advocate Mr. Barde. He tries to point out to this Court that there was no express termination in the matter and hence, the proceedings were filed before the Industrial Court to secure the work under Item 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of the M.R.T.U. & P.U.L.P. Act. He further points out that as of now, the petitioner is about 63 years old. 2. Perusal of the complaint itself shows that on 15.11.1999, when the petitioner demanded the helper, he was driven out of work. 3. In this situation, the view taken by the Industrial Court appears to be just and proper. The petitioner has to approach the Labour Court for grant of appropriate 2 wp1511.11 declaration and thereafter only his entitlement to regularisation can be considered. The Petition is not entertained. No costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE. 14.03.2011 gas/wp1511.11