{1} ao2111.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 21 OF 2011 Nandlal s/o Champalal Bhoma and another Appellants Versus Ashok s/o Shankarrao Patil and others Respondents Mr. B.R.Waramma, advocate for appellants. Mr.A.D.Kasliwal, advocate for Respondent No.4. CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 04 th May, 2011 PER COURT: 1 It is informed that before considering the application at Exhibit-5 and passing of the order thereon, the property in dispute is already alienated, as such, the application came to be rejected. There was again an attempt on the part of respondents to create third party interest and, therefore, an application is moved to the trial Court at Exhibit-39. It is also informed that on consideration of the application, the trial Court has directed the parties to maintain status quo. 2 So far as instant Appeal from Order is concerned, as the property in dispute has already been alienated, there was no propriety in granting any restraint order, as prayed for by the {2} ao2111.odt appellants. The application was rightly rejected by the trial Court. 3 It would be open for the trial Court, however, to consider the application, as presented by appellants at Exhibit-39, on its own merits. 4 Appeal from Order stands rejected. R.M.BORDE JUDGE ******* adb/ao2111