1 APPA.692-2011 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 692 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 922 OF 2010 Sharad Mohan Pandit ...Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. ---- Ms. Manjula Rao a/w Manish Rai, for the Applicant. Mr. P.S. Hingorani, APP for the State. Mr. Ajit Patil i/b Mr. K.S. Patil for Respondent No.10. ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE & M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2011. P.C.:- 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant and the learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The applicant is original complainant and at his behest an F.I.R. bearing No.74/2007, for the offence punishable under Sections 2 APPA.692-2011 395,397, and 342 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 r/w Section 3 of the Arms Act, was registered at the Revedanda Police Station. The Trial Court had acquitted the accused and further directed muddemal properties of cash, ornaments of gold as well as silver and other properties be returned to the complainant. However, since the appeal against acquittal of the accused has been filed by the complainant against the said judgment and order passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad-Alibag, the said ornaments have not been returned. 3. Learned A.P.P. has no objection if the said order is confirmed. Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 4. Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (M.L. TAHALIYANI, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)