THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Rev. CMP No.7910 in C.R.P.No.610 of 2009 and Rev. CMP No.7911 in C.R.P.No.611 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: These applications are filed with a prayer to review the common order, dated 25.08.2009, passed in C.R.P.Nos.610 and 611 of 2009. The respondents in the C.R.Ps. filed these applications. In the review petitions, several facts, which have bearing upon the events subsequent to the passing of the order, are mentioned. Much of the discussion is about the way in which the respective parties have understood the order. This Court does not find any basis to review the order, since it is not even mentioned that this Court has wrongly referred to any factual situation or that the order runs contrary to the judgment rendered by the superior Court. On the other hand, it is stated that this very order was carried in appeal before the Hon’ble Supreme Court and that it was affirmed. However, one aspect, which this Court finds acceptance, is that in sub-para (a) of the order, this Court did not indicate the date of reconstitution of the general body. Mentioning of the date becomes relevant in view of the fact that several such reconstitutions have taken place from time to time. Reconstitution mentioned in that paragraph is referable to the one carried out on 02.11.2008. Hence, the applications are partly allowed limited to the extent of mentioning the date of reconstitution in sub-para (a) of the concluding portion of the order. Hence, it is directed that in sub-para (a) of last paragraph, after the words “general body”, the words “as on 02.11.2008’ shall be added. In all other respects, the order shall remain intact. It is also made clear that if the society has any registered byelaws, the observation made by this Court about the submission made across the Bar, shall not come in the way. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:02.07.2010. Kdl