FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8067 OF 2011 "M/s. Construction Technique Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." with WRIT PETITION NO. 8068 OF 2011 “Jay Bee Electrics Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. M.S. Kulkarni, Advocate for petitioner. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondent No.1. Mr. P.V. Mandlik, Senior Counsel for respondent No.2. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 14TH OCTOBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] It is the contention of the petitioners that the time for accepting the tenders was up to 5.00 p.m. on 12th October, 2011 and though the petitioners had gone to submit the tenders at 4.05 p.m., the same were not accepted. Hence, the present petitions. 2] However, learned AGP, on instructions from the respondents, makes a categorical statement that the respondents have decided to issue fresh advertisement inviting tenders. 3] In that view of the matter, the grievance of the petitioners no more survive. Writ petitions are, therefore, disposed of. [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-