IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9185 of 2009 Between: A.Govinda Raju S/o.A.Narasimha H.No.29-1434/1/36 Kakatiya Nagar Naredmet,Malkajgiri(M) R.R District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police Cyberabad,having office at Cyberabad Hyderabad 2 The Station House Officer P.S Neredmet,Cyberabad 3 M.Bala Lingam S/o Laxman Malkajgiri Municipal Council H.No.27-136/37 Neredmet,Malkajgiri R.R District .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MOHD.MOIN AHMED QUADRI Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2:AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.2 is interfering with the life and personal liberty of the petitioner at the instance of respondent No.3 with whom the petitioner has got pending civil disputes. In paragraph 7 of the counter-affidavit filed by the Inspector of Police, Neredmet Police Station, Cyberabad, Hyderabad, it is stated as under: “It is submitted that respondent No.2 never interfered with the personal liberty of the petitioner by way of calling and summoning the petitioner for the purpose of settling the civil dispute pertaining to the residential house bearing MC.No.29-1434/1/36 on Plot Nos.36 and 38 under Sy.No.283, 284 and 285 admeasuring 700 Sq.yads at Kakatiyanagar, Neredmet, Malkajgiri, Ranga Reddy District.” At the hearing, Sri Mohd.Moin Ahmed Quadri, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the stand taken by respondent No.2 in the above-reproduced portion of the counter-affidavit, the writ petition may be closed. Having regard to the same, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.12030 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 11th JUNE, 2009. kvni