IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 25TH JULY 2011 / 3RD SRAVANA 1933 RP.No. 540 of 2011() ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.16374/2011 Dated 24/06/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER/PETITIONER ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHANDRIKA AMMA, W/O.LATE KESAVANKUTTY NAIR, CHITRA NIVAS, PAZHAYANNUR POST, THALAPPILLI TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. PRAKASAN @ GOVINDANKUTTY, S/O.CHANDRIKA AMMA, NIVEDHYA HOUSE, KOORATTIKARA, KADAVALLUR POST, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.H.BADARUDDIN SMT.B.SHAMEERA RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------------------------------- 1. SARAMMA, W/O.JOHN JOSEPH, KAKKANADU PARAMBIL HOUSE, ENKAKKAD VILLAGE, ENKAKKAD POST, WADAKANCHERRY, THALAPPILLI TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 587. 2. CHAKRAPANI P.S., S/O.SIVARAMAKRISHNA VAIDHYAR, THEKKATHARA, KINATHINKARA MADAM, PAZHAYANNUR, THALAPPILLI TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 587. 3. RAMASWAMY GURUKKAL, S/O.NANU GURUKKAL, N.R.V.MANDHIRAM, PAZHAYANNUR, THALAPPILLI TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 587. 4. RAMESH, S/O.P.K.MADHAVAN, VADAKA POTTA, PUTHENCHERIKKAL HOUSE, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 680 741. 2/- -2- RP.NO.540/2011 5. SANTHOSH, S/O.SANKARAN, KUMBALAKODE, THADATHIL HOUSE, PAZHAYANNUR VILLAGE, THALAPPILLI TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 587. 6. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAZHAYANNUR POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 587. 7. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PAZHAYANNUR POLICE STATION, THRISSUR - 680 587. R1 TO R5 BY ADV.SRI.RANJITH XAVIER R6 & R7 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.R.BINDU THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts R.BASANT& K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- R.P.No.540 of 2011 in WP(C) No.16374 of 2011-V ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th July, 2011 JUDGMENT Basant, J The petitioners have filed this application for review of the judgment dated 24.6.2011. We have heard the learned counsel for the review petitioners. We are not persuaded to agree that there is any error apparent on the face of the record. No new contentions are raised. All contentions raised have been taken into consideration before passing the judgment dated 24.6.2011. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the impugned order is causing difficulties to the petitioners when the matter is taken up before the Sub Divisional Magistrate. 2. We have not expressed any opinion on merits about the dispute before the Sub Divisional Magistrate. We do not in these circumstances find any merit in the grievance raised. This review petition is in these circumstances dismissed. sd/- R.BASANT JUDGE sd/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE /true copy/ css/ P.S.TO JUDGE