IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 10614 of 2011 Date of decision : 16.08.2011 Kavita and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sunil Nehra, DAG, Haryana for the State. Mr. Rajneesh Chadwal, Advocate for respondent No. 6. RANJIT SINGH J. The issue arisen in the writ petition has been decided in Civil Writ Petition No. 6432 of 2011, which is as under:- “ My attention has been invited to a Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Darshana Devi Versus State of Haryana and others , 2009 (1) PLR 174, where it has been held on the basis of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Karnataka Versus Ameerbi, (2007) 11 SCC 681 that the person working as Angarwari worker does not hold a civil post and the recruitment process is not governed by the Constitution or any statute. That being the position, the writ petition could not be maintainable as the authorities are not instrumentalities of State to be amenable to the definition of “State” under Article 12 of the Constitution of Civil Writ Petition No. 10614 of 2011 -2- India. Counsel for the petitioner, if so advised, may avail the alternative remedy as may be available to the petitioner in accordance with law. The writ petition is, thus, dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to have the alternative remedy.” The present writ petition is dismissed in the same terms. August 16, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH) rts JUDGE