1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA NO.5066 OF 2009 IN FAST NO.8936 OF 2009 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S.G.Chapalgaonkar, Adv., for applicant. ... CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 10 th June, 2009 ... 1. Heard learned Counsel for the appellant Insurance Company. There is delay of 162 days in causing to file the appeal, to challenge the order in MACP No.421/2005, dt.28.7.2008. 2. The Advocate appearing on behalf of the Insurance Company communicated the decision along with opinion to the Divisional Office at Nanded on 1 st Oct., 2008. Thereafter, the Divisional office at Nanded called for opinion of the Advocate and requested to suggest as to whether there are grounds to file appeal or the same has to be satisfied. In the process, there was 2 delay. The sanction was to be received from the regional office. Considering these aspects, the delay of 162 days in causing to file appeal, challenging the judgment dt.28.7.2008, is condoned. Application allowed. (K.U.Chandiwal) Judge. agp/office/ ca5066-09