IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5454 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision : 06.10.2009 Baltej Singh .....Petitioner versus Surinder Singh .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.I.P.S.Kohli, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 16.12.2006 passed by the learned District Judge, Faridkot, whereby the petitioner's application for assignment of both the Civil Suits filed by him against the respondent, to one Court has been dismissed. The impugned order itself reveals that both the Civil Suits i.e. one for permanent injunction and another for specific performance of the agreement to sell, are between the same parties and pertain to the same property. The two Civil Suits are, however, pending in two different Courts. It would always be convenient to both the parties if both the Civil Suits, though may not be clubbed, are assigned to the same Presiding C.R. No.5454 of 2008 (O&M) 2 Officer and are taken together for hearing on the same date. Suffice it to observe that no prejudice shall be caused to either of the parties if both the Civil Suits are entrusted to one Court. For the reasons afore-stated, the revision petition is allowed; the impugned order dated 16.12.2006 is set-aside and while accepting the petitioner's prayer, the learned District Judge, Faridkot, is directed to entrust, both the Civil Suits titled as Baltej Singh versus Surinder Singh (suit for permanent injunction), pending in the Court of Sh.B.K.Bhatia, Civil Judge (Senior Division), Moga and Baltej Singh versus Surinder Singh (suit for specific performance), pending in the Court of Smt. Rajwinder Kaur, Civil Judge (Junior Division), Moga, to one Court. Dasti. 06-10-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE