BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Tenth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14585 of 2011 1 R.RAJESWARI 2 KAMMADACHI @ KAMATCHI 3 MOOKKAN 4 MUTHUMARI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.2 to 5 Vs STATE, REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SANKARANKOVIL, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.24 OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.THIRUVADIKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S. K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police, for offences under Sections 48-A, 406 and 506(i) of I.P.C. and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, the petitioners have come up with this petition, seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, the first petitioner has got illicit intimacy with the first accused. The first accused is the husband of the de-facto complainant. The second petitioner is the mother-in-law and the third petitioner is the sister-in-law and the fourth petitioner is the sister-in-law of the de-facto complainant. It is alleged that the first accused demanded dowry and harassed the de-facto complainant. It is further alleged that these petitioners joined hands with the first accused and committed the above crimes. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would deny the above allegations. According to him, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He would submit that the first petitioner has got no connection at all with the first accused and she is not a relative of the first accused. So far as the other petitioners are concerned, the second petitioner is an aged woman and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the fourth petitioner has been given in marriage already and the third petitioner is aged 50 years. Thus, according to the petitioners all the family members have been roped in. 4. I have considered the above submissions. 5. Having regard to the above facts and the overt act attributed to these petitioners and all other attendant circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners but with conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil, on executing separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks, without fail. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. sd/- 10/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SANKARANKOVIL 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SANKARANKOVIL, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. A.THIRUVADIKUMAR Advocate SR.No.39020 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14585 of 2011 Date :10/11/2011 SMA/12.11.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/