HIGHCOURT_QF,CHHATriSGARH_^AlLB!LASPUR ^- Writ Pctition (S) No. 4096 of2008 PETITIONER : Smt. Shashi Trivedi aged about 49 years, Wife of Shri Umashankar Trivedi, Resident of Primaiy School, North Jhagrakliand, District Korea (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Department of School Educadon, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur(CG). 2. The District Education Officer, Korea, District Korea 3. Administrator/Headmaster, Primary School, North Jhagrakliand, District Korea (CG). 4. The Director, Directorate, Public Institution, Pension Bada, Raipur (CG). (WSIT PETITION LWDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITLTTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'bleMr.SatishK.AfiTOhotrtJ.) Present : Shri R.K. Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner. NIs. Sunita Jain, Panel Lavvy'er for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on 29th day ofJisly, 2008) 1. Vv/ith the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. The petitioner claims to be an Assistant Teachen working m I.E.M. School, Jhagrakhand, District Korea (CG), run and managed by the respondent No. 3. The petitioner without giving details as to what is the natiire of the School, vvhy the teachers are at par vvith other teachers; has filed this petition, praying that the respondents be directed to grant benefits of 5 Pav Commission w.e.f. 01.01.1996. 3. Be that as it may, it is difflcult to decide the issue involved for want of adequate materials with regard to grant of 5 Pay Commission to the employees. ss 4. This Court has already considered and decided the same issue 01 06.02.2007 in the matter ofA. Lall (Smt.) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others1 (W.P. NQ. 4108 of2005) and other connected matters. 5. lt is not necessary to approach this Court directly when the law on a particular issue has already been settled. The petitioner may make a representation to the concemed authorities, if so advised, in the light of law settled by this Court in the matter of A. Lall (Smt) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others (Supra). 6. Thls petition is accordiiigly disposed of with the above stated liberty. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sahu '• 2007 (1) BLJ 265