HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.23832 of 2011 Date : 8-9-2011 Between: Smt. Najma Begum .. Petitioner And The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Represented by its Commissioner, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri Thoom Srinivas Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 : Sri R.Radhakrishna Reddy, Standing Counsel The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed complaining inaction on the part of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in taking action against respondent Nos.4 to 6 for the raising the alleged illegal constructions. At the hearing, Sri R. Radhakrishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation representing respondent Nos.1 to 3, submitted on instructions, that on 13-5-2011, a notice under Section 452 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short "the Act") was issued to respondent Nos.4 to 6 and that they have submitted their explanation. He further submitted that the said explanation is under consideration of respondent No.3 who will dispose of the same and take appropriate action depending upon the decision taken by him. In the light of the above submission of the learned Standing Counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.3 to consider the explanation submitted by respondent Nos.4 to 6 to the notice issued under Section 452 of the Act and take a decision thereon within a period of one week from today. If respondent No.3 comes to the conclusion that respondent Nos.4 to 6 have raised the constructions illegally, he shall take action in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of passing the order on the explanation submitted by them to the notice issued under Section 452 of the Act. As a sequel, WPMP No.29198/2011 is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Date : 8-9-2011 AM