IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 693 of 2010 Date of decision: August 16, 2010 State of Haryana .. Petitioner Vs. M/s Sethi Seed and Pesticide and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate for the respondents. A.N. Jindal, J Assailed in this petition is the order dated 28.7.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra, allowing the revision petition filed by the accused- respondents against the order dated 26.5.2009 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kurukshetra, framing charge against the accused under Section 19 (a) of the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985 and under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Having perused the records of the case, it transpires that the prosecution has only a report Ex.P2 to enable the court to frame the charge, otherwise, there is no evidence as to how and in what manner and from which place the samples were taken and, whether the samples were intact and also in a fit condition to be sent to the Chemical Examiner for analysis, in the absence of which it is difficult to hold that there was a prima facie case for framing charge against the accused. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. August 16, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge