IN THB HI8H GS0UfiT ®JFJBDICATURB AT BIIASPUR (eHHATTISSABH) WRXT S TITOOB SO. ^5 QS' 2081 ;:a^Jesb Kiamae' BvSaeyjaon ef 'Eisks. sySBvibayfggeQ. 32 years I^R/o QuaffteB- geys-Qf Staeet lfel:»3BB S&ater-Bg' Bhllal,' yBhilai NagaBgjBisferiet Duig'. " - .- pBTirioiaia K!sV State of shhatti^dah ig ThEQugh the Seeretsary of GOv-tt. of eaihsit-tlisgarii.., Haiae (Poli.ss ) Bepae'tment (Slihsfc-tiisgarh) T.mapeiatos seasral v£ Peltee Bhi.lai» Mstt»3 Darg. S!i(pei?intendenfe of Polieey S^a'biaa H®use@SfieesgIPollee Sta1si.an ,,B-aEg Baldeo Singh Halwa ^ s®ao£ Presfeam Slagh Malwa aged; 34 y®gffs, r/o @» S Soad Malwa MaEftst '„ BaBcr. RESE>@1®ENTS es'srt'Ssws'w •eSBiK'sss 0SBH® ^WS^SW:S391'.9&^SWS83VEWES3S 0B-: 're'~©y.aiwmi>i&' ''iBeE¥:~Bii:%Q3£W3^ ~' illli H'ii II ffill Kli fi M R?'i ^- B-ii:; Bi"i3 IIUIi SK: 1-'?' .^^. ^^'^Nra^t..'B^Nfr!S, .W.-..P.....N.0......1.3/2001 'Wl 200 [:li IL SII^tqiT f^iNTan^?! . -^q •<i-lf?CT smS?!'s^nwH%?i 19/3/2001^ 'wifepN'wRif'?'fs'zt ^f5R?R '3; 3rf?gii aii^i Mr, Visbnu Kostba, learjaed GOUnseI for tbe petitiDner. Dr. N.K. Shukla, leame^ Dy.A.G. for the State. Heerd. Retuzn Ta.s.s been filed. ,_«t<TTldAA± fo/¥>... . . J_ . _ ... .. . ., ^>etition 'j.s—dismissedi}iasmuch as the instter raised •^"f 1 ttji thc prp"mt- pcti.tion aa aj since the complaint t^led byj the Court,—ltwas open to ,t^ie petj.tj.oner to talceiprodQcic tinflerl" relevait provisions of Cr.P.y. On careful perusal of peti.tion as well as reply f4.1edGn behalf of the Sfate,; I am of the view that there -i.s-no petitioner. the coap.laj.nt of for the petitioner is th?t if disHu.ssel. With- these obser\ is disposed of« According to Dr. N.K. Sbukla, ;npn-cogn±zable offence. ^ .E'urther, ' the petitJoner was dism^issedby. the ' '• ^s^ avertnents.in the .-\ scope for the High. Court tQ inter- fere in thematter. Accordl^ig to learnefi cpunsel for -ehe ttoe pet.itj-oner was rejec-fce^ simply on the ground tha-k another Cfjimplaint. filedby responderit.no. 5 was pending. :In substance, the subni.tssioia of learned connsel •ths petj.tioner 1& te take^further proceedlng the guestion of r^s Judicata nay stand In ttis way. It appears that the petltj.on^r sbould seek remedy in approprj.ate foruin under relevant provisl4ns of l-aw sgslnst the ordes: of ations snd da.rect.ton, this^petlt.J.OB