IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11220 of 2010 PAWAN KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 7 19.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. It would appear from perusal of contents of complaint petition that petitioner and co- accused Harendra Singh took some cash from complainant on credit and subsequently when complainant demanded his money, petitioner issued cheque in the name of the complainant and when the aforesaid cheque was present before the concerned bank the same became bounced. Although, the cognizance has been taken under Sections 420, 406, 379, 323 of the I.P.C. and 138 of N.I. Act, it appears to me that offence under Section 406 and 420 of the I.P.C. are not applicable in this case and so far as allegation of theft is concerned the same appears to be super additional. 2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail application is allowed and it is ordered that petitioner, namely, Pawan Kumar, in the event of arrest/surrender within 30 days from the date of communication of this order to the concerned court in connection with Complaint Case No.105 of 2008, shall be released on released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Bikramganj, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. PN/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)