1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2035/2007 (Hari Ram Vs. Nathu Ram & Anr.) Date of order :: 22.02.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.Mukesh Vyas, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the land in question which is going to be auctioned by the Bank was earlier mortgaged with the petitioner and a suit was filed by the petitioner before the Additional District Judge, Anoopgarh against the respondent No.2, in which, stay has been granted with regard to the same property which is going to be auctioned by the Bank. After perusing the writ petition, I am of the opinion that no interference is required by this Court 2 for restraining the Bank to auction the property in question. However, the petitioner is free to implead Bank as party in the suit which is filed by him. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. A.K. Chouhan/-