IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 11446 of 1997 Between: M/s.Reliance Cellulose Products Ltd., Patancheru, Medak District, Rep. by its Executive Director Sri A.K.Jhun-Jhunwala. ... PETITIONER AND 1 Industrial Tribunal-II, Chandra Vihar Buildings, Hyd. 2 S.Bikshapathy, S/o Balarajaiah, President, M/s. Nagarjuna Steels Ltd. Employee's Union, Patancheru, Medak Dist. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order, direction or a writ particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARI after calling for the records from the 1st respondent and quash the award passed by the 1st respondent in I.D.No.139/94, dt.27-6-96. Counsel for the Petitioner : MS.G.SUDHA Counsel for the Respondent NO.1: G.P.FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent NO.2 : MR.K.BALAGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO : 11660 of 1997 Between: M/s.Reliance Cellulose Products Ltd., Patancheru, Medak Dist., rep by its Executive Director Sri A.K.Jhun-Jhunwala. ... PETITIONER AND 1 Industrial Tribunal-II, Chandra Vihar buildings, Hyd. 2 P.Purushotham, S/o Sathiraju, C/o President, M/s Nagarjuna Steels Ltd., Employee's Union, Patancheru, Medak Dist. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order, direction or a writ particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARI after calling for the records from the 1st respondent and quash the award passed by the 1st respondent in I.D.No.81/94 dt.25-6-96 Counsel for the Petitioner : MS.G.SUDHA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : MR.K.BALAGOPAL The Court made the following : COMMON ORAL ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for both parties that these two matters are covered by the judgment of this Court dated 26.09.2003, in W.P.No.11678 of 1997 and batch, wherein this Court dismissed the writ petitions. Following the same, these two writ petitions are also dismissed. No costs. __________________ 30th September, 2004 pan To 1. The Industrial Tribunal-II, Chandra Vihar Buildings, Hyderabad. 2) Two C.Cs. to the G.P.for Labour, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. 3) Two CDs.