IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 5321 of 2008. Decided on: 30th August, 2010. Rattan Chand. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate vice Mr.K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Respondents No. 3 to 5 are exparte. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. D.P. Gupta, learned vice counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that in view of the reply filed by respondents No. 1 and 2, there is no merit in this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge August 30, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?