IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.929 OF 2006 DATED:07.09.2010 Between: Bommati Narayana … Petitioner And The Municipal Commissioner Warangal and another … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.929 OF 2006 ORDER: Though the case is listed in the interlocutory matters, at the request of the learned counsel for the parties the writ petition itself is being disposed of finally. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction by way of Mandamus to declare the action of first respondent in not taking action, in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Corporation Act, on the representations made by the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner along with others was statedly granted occupancy rights certificate in respect of the land in Sy. Nos.11, 87 and 196 of Lashkar Singaram Village, Hanmakonda Mandal, Warangal District, under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955. The grievance of the petitioner is that when some third parties are making encroachment of the land and are trying to make constructions in the said land, he along with others filed representations before the first respondent seeking protection from encroachments and to stop the unauthorized constructions, but no action is taken on the said representations. I have perused the copies of the representations filed by the petitioner along with others. The said representations are very vague. The extent of the land held by the petitioner, as an occupant, and the details of the alleged unauthorized constructions made in the said land are not given. In the absence of the same, no direction as prayed for can be granted. If third parties are trying to enter into the land of the petitioner, it is open for him to pursue his remedies available under civil law, but under the guise of making representations, the petitioner cannot seek any relief in this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is devoid of merit. However, if any constructions are made in the land unauthorizedly and without any approval of plans by the competent authority, it is open to the petitioner to approach the authorities concerned by giving details of such constructions by way of representation. I am sure that if such a representation is made, the authorities concerned will look into the matter and take necessary steps. Subject to the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. _____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 07.09.2010 bnr