IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. 21771 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 22nd July, 2011. Nafe Singh Petitioner through Mr. Neeraj Gaur, Advocate Versus State of Haryana. Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] In this second petition, the petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in the case FIR No. 648 dated 31.12.2010, registered under Sections 406/409/420/467/468/471/120-B IPC and Section 7/13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, at Police Station, Nuh, District Mewat. The afore-stated FIR has been registered on the report submitted by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Chief Minister's Flying Squad, Faridabad. The petitioner earlier also approached this Court by way of Criminal Misc. No. 12282 of 2011 which was, however, withdrawn by him on 16.05.2011 with the following liberty:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the Ilaqa Magistrate. The petitioner may thereafter seek his release on regular bail and in case he does so, the same shall be disposed of in accordance with law preferably on the same day but not later than two days”. The petitioner was one of the Sub Registrar posted at Nuh who is alleged to have registered certain sale deeds at the instance and in connivance with the then Land Acquisition Collector at Nuh. One of the petitioner's co-accused, namely, Mohd. Ishaq also approached this Court vide Criminal Misc. No. M-12794 of 2011 which was dismissed on 31st May, 2011 for the reasons already assigned by this Court in the order dated 16th May, 2011 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 2999 of 2011 [K.K.Amrohi v State of Haryana] which was filed by the main accused – K.K.Amrohi. In this second petition, no changed circumstances have been referred to which may persuade this Court to entertain this petition. Contrary to it, the petitioner failed to avail the liberty granted by this Court vide order dated 16.05.2011. As the matter involves syphoning of a huge amount of the public funds by the main accused in the alleged connivance of the petitioner and other associates and for the reasons already assigned by this Court in the order dated 16th May, 2011 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 2999 of 2011 [K.K.Amrohi v State of Haryana], I am of the considered view that no case to grant the concession of pre-arrest bail is made out. Dismissed. July 22, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE