(D $9 SINGLE BENCH IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. w. P. (S) No. \ (a; of 2011 / :1. Yogesh Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri Chhabilal Sahu, aged about 3O years, R/o Banjaripara, Ward No. 10, Utai, District—Burg (C.G.) 2. Sunil Kumar Patel, S/o K.R. Patel, aged about 24 years, R/o Behind Murrabhatta, Gayanagar, Durg, District-Burg (C.G.) 3. Heman Lal Sahu, S/o Ghanshyam Sahu, aged about 36 years, R/o Dhuniyar Chowk, Ward No. 8, Utai, District-Durg (C.G.) 4. Kamlesh Kumar Thakur, S/o Kanwal Singh, aged about 32 years, R/o Bijebhatha, Post-Karela, Tahsil- Patan, District-Durg (C.G.) Ganeshram Sahu, S/ Pusauram Sahu, aged about 45 years, R/o Nehru Nagar, Ward No. 9, Utai, District-Durg (C.G.) 6. Ashok Kumar Dhimar, S/o Chamarram Dhimar, aged about 36 years, Ward No. 9, Utai, District- Durg (C.G.) 7. Yaadram Sahu, S/o Sujan Singh, aged about 36 years, R/o Village- KuthreL Post—Batrel, P.S.-Ranchirai, Tahsil-Gunderdehi, District-Durg (C.G.) 8. Narayan Prasad, S/o Ajulal, aged about 35 years, R/o Pongri, Post- Gotkapar, Tahsi|—Gunderdehi, District—Durg (C.G.) 9. Sanjit Kumar, S/o Rajulal, aged about 35 years, R/o Lamoro, Post— Tamora, Tahsil-Gunderdehi, District— Durg (C.G,) PETITIONERS o \\ @ Ahilya Bai,W/o Late ltwari Ram, aged about 40 years, R/o Bazar Chowk, Ward No. 3, Utai, District— Durg(C.G.) 11. BhuvanlaL S/o Amrit, aged about 35 years, R/o Kanakot, Tahsil—Patan, District-Durg (C.G.) 127/ Yashwant Kumar, S/o Thukel, aged about 37 years, R/o Khola, Post- Dhamna, Tahsil-Patan, District—Burg (C.G.) VERSUS r RESPONDENTS :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Under Secretary, Department of Urban Administration, K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Nagar Panchayat Utai, District-Burg, through its Chief Municipal Officer, Utai,. District-Durg (C,G.) 4. The Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Utai, District—Durg (C.G.) 5. The President, Nagar Panchayat, Utai, District—Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I D. \AO HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1565 0f2011 PETITIONERS : Yogesh Kumar Sahu & Others. VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON STITUTION OF INDIA $B: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri ACSahu, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent N0. 1&2. ORDER (ORAL (Passed on 28 day of April, 201 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly and fairly submit that the issue with regard to applicability of circulars dated 23.09.2010 and 05.03.2008 was considered in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others v. The State ofC/1ham'sgarh d2 Ofhersj. This Court, after hearing all the parties, considered the issue and passed the order in Virendra Das Manikpuri & OthersJ. This petition may be disposed ofaccordingly. 2. Thus, having regard to the facts situation of the case, wherein the issue involved in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others] as well as in this case are one and the same, the instant petition stands disposed of in the same terms and order passed in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others] . Sdl- SATISH K. ANGNIHORI Judge 1 W.P.(S) N0, 7450 of 201 O, decided on 10.02.2011