IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2008 / 10TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 26274 of 2008(C) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------------- P.V.SAJI, PULIKAYATH PUTHENPURA, MAZHUVANNOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSHKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.26274/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT Ext.P3 is a judgment passed by the Tribunal, setting aside the order passed by the first respondent, declining the replacement of a stage carriage and directing to grant the replacement as sought for by the petitioner, if the request is otherwise in accordance with the rules. In pursuance to Ext.P3, petitioner filed Ext.P4 request before the second respondent for the implementation of Ext.P3. 2. In this writ petition, complaint is regarding the delay in taking action on Ext.P4 request. In view of the judgment of the STAT, it is for the second respondent to consider Ext.P4. Necessarily, if his request for replacement is otherwise in accordance with the rules, it should be granted. 2 Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the second respondent shall take necessary action on Ext.P4, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 3 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. 3