IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.612 of 2009 SUDIN YADAV, S/O LATE JAGGAL YADAV, R/O VILLAGE-SADPUR, P.S.-SHAHKUND, DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR. ……………PETITIONER. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE D.G.P. BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BHAGALPUR. 4. THE THANA-IN-CHARGE, SANHOULA POLICE STATION, BHAGALPUR. 5. VIKASH YADAV, S/O BHOLI YADAV, 6. DHIRO YADAV, S/O VIKASH YADAV, 7. BASUKI YADAV, S/O CHHOTE CHOUDHARY, ALL RESPONDENT NOS. 5 TO 7 ARE R/O VILLAGE- SRIRAMPUR, P.S.-AKBARNAGAR, DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR. 8. SHANKAR YADAV, S/O CHAMAKLAL YADAV, R/O VILLAGE-SHAHKUND, P.S.-SHAHKUND, DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR. ……………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 20.04.2010 In this writ application petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to institute the FIR in respect of kidnapping of his minor son. A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents in which it has been disclosed that the FIR has already been instituted and preliminary charge sheet has been submitted in respect of involvement of one accused and investigation is pending in respect of other named accused persons. Thus, it appears that the purpose of this writ application stands fulfilled. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 2 the petitioner-informant is not satisfied with the progress in the investigation. If that is so, he has remedy available in law by way of filing of protest petition. So far as this writ application is concerned, it has become infructuous. Therefore, the same is dismissed as not pressed. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)