1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.750 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.1861 OF 2002 Raishi Shivji Chheda & ors ..Plaintiffs V/s. Dhirajlal Raishi Chheda & ors .. Defendants Mr.G.S.Bhat, Advocate, for defendant No.1 Defendant No.1-in-person Mr.J.G.Shukla, Advocate, for the plaintiffs CORAM : SMT.R.S.DALVI, J. DATE : 9TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 P.C. . This suit is filed for a declaration that plaintiff No.1 is the sole owner of the suit properties. Several documents have been challenged. An Order in respect of the revocation of the certain licenses stated to have been granted is prayed for. Defendant No.1 is a son of plaintiff No.1. He has filed certain documents and counter claim for enforcement of family settlement read with a Deed of Dissolution and for a declaration that various other documents are 2 valid and subsisting. Based upon those documents, he has claimed possession of the suit properties and compensation. 2. It is clear that the suit rests initially on documentary evidence. The documents are disputed. The very stamp paper on which they are executed is of much dispute. The stamps have been sent to India Security Press, Nasik for verification. Certain other documents are required to be seen by the authority to consider their genuineness in terms of the stamps. So soon as that exercise is completed, plaintiff No.1, who is aged 86 years, must stand trial. 3. Hence, the following order. (i) As soon as the final report/opinion in respect of the stamps with regard to the family settlement read with two MOUs relied upon in this suit is obtained, the suit shall be placed on board for framing issues and the plaintiffs shall file their affidavit of examination-in-chief. (ii) The Chamber Summons stands disposed of accordingly. (SMT.R.S.DALVI, J.)