408 4 ee 1 CWP NO13975of2007 etc 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF 1CWP No13975 of2007 OcOlVll j Gurdev Singh 1X 0 VERSUS C Stateof Punjab Others 1 C5 CWP N0e19283of2006 08Ml e UjagarSingh Petitioner Il Z VERSUS Statcof Punjab Others 1 0 e e 3aCWP Noe11213 of2004 08M1 e DarshanKumar 1 C t 4 VERSUS 3 Z Others e e 4eCWPN001870of200GMJ Qe Lakha Singh l 7 VERSUS 1 StatcofPunjabcOOthers n 5eCWPNo19279 of2007 084Ml Harnek SinghSiOthers eePetitioner VERSUS Stntcof PunjabSi Others e e 6eCWPNoe3208of2009 gurdiaISinghS Others VERSUS Stateof Punjab Q Others 4 Uma 2014.03.28 14: 52 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 9 409 4 m 41 CWP NO3975 of2007 etc 2 r CORAM HONBLE MRJUSTICE PERMOD KOHLJ PRESENT MrBR SharmaMrRS Shanna MrGS Bal VKJindal 1 Walia Advocates for the 1 Q MrBSChahal DAG Punjab 0 C Permod Kohli Je 0 1 I Z Sinceall thesepetitionsinvolve coinmon questionsof Iaw and facts 12 thesame are ofbythis common order 0 The petitioners are seekingthe retiral I pension 08 thepetitioners were working as with 00 lhe StateGovernment 14 on wage basis Theywere appOinted V Z on various datesindicatedin thewrit petitionsTheywere placedin regular Cl pay scale theyhave more than20 years of serviceas watchmenThe maIn gnevance of the is that 7 thc pctitioners being granted are not the benefits whereas l siinilarlysituatedpersonshave beengrantedthepensionarybeneOts on the C SllCilgth of various judgments passcdbythisCourt in the of Baldev cases SinghVSe Stateof PunjabCWP decided Oll Rakha SinghVSe State of Punjaband others CWP No78012004 decidedon 27120051 and DangalSingh State of Punjab VS and OrSe CWP Noa15544of 2007 dccided Oll 171 le20081Similar mattcrs arc pelldlng in this Court in Some of such cases the SlateGovcnlinenthad Uma 2014.03.28 14: 52 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 410 9 1 r4 41 C 1 CWP NO13975of2007 etc 3 eirl ier releasedthe pensionbut laterwithdrew tllc same 111a similar matter lee CWP No83 112009learnedcounsel for thc Stutc had producedOll record Memo NoAS7 dated 17A2009 whereby the StateGoverninenthastakena decisionto ofthis Court 111Vlew ofdismissalofthe SLP Oledbythe State 1 1 Govcrninentbeforethe Honble Supreme Court The and substanceof sum 0 this Circular is to the of the court In this view ofthe Ca3 matlcr the petitioners ln all the aforesaidpetitions are entitled to the C5 benefits on the same analogy as in cases rcferredto hereninw abovc Z r2 r 4t A copy ofthis order bc placed on record on cach concernedfile 08 oo 1 r PERMOD KOHLO 40 wm Z JUDGE 1e72009 Qm MFK 1Pl 1 el Uma 2014.03.28 14: 52 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document