1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3584 OF 2010. Lokmanya Tilak Jankalyan Shikshan Sanstha, Nagpur. -: VERSUS :- Shivkumar Jaywantrao Karale and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : AUGUST 04, 2010. Heard Shri R. Joshi, learned Counsel for petitioner and Shri R.N. Sen, learned Counsel for respondent no.1. Perused the impugned order. It is apparent that the learned Presiding Officer, College Tribunal, has directed production of documents, as the documents are found necessary to appreciate the contentions of appellant before it. Shri Sen, learned Counsel for respondent/appellant states that the respondent tried to demonstrate before the College Tribunal that those documents were demanded before the inquiry officer and were not produced by the Management. 2 Shri Joshi, learned Counsel states that what ever documents were demanded by the respondent during the inquiry were already supplied to him and the records of the departmental inquiry are itself proof of these state of affairs. After hearing the respective Counsel, I am satisfied that the Presiding Officer of College Tribunal has not closed this debate at all and the debate is open. The respective counsel therefore can place their contentions for appreciation of the College Tribunal. With liberty to petitioner to approach again, if it is aggrieved in the matter, Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.