IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH MARCH 2011 / 19TH PHALGUNA 1932 LA.App..No. 94 of 2006 (C) ----------------------------- LAR.110/1999 of ADDL.SUB COURT,N. PARAVUR .................... APPELLANT(S): ADDL. 2ND RESPONDENT ---------------------------------------------- THE SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, KALADY. BY ADV. SRI.B.S.KRISHNAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.K.ANAND, SC, SANSKRIT UTY. SMT.LATHA KRISHNAN,SC,SANSKRIT UTY. SRI.M.K.DAMODARAN SR. ADVOCATE, SRI.P.K.VIJAYAMOHANAN SRI.ALAN PAPALI RESPONDENT(S): IST RESPONDENT & CLAIMANT ------------------------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY DIST. COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 2. ITTEERA OUSEPH, PATTATHY HOUSE, KALADY. GOVT. PLEADER SMT.T.T.JOSEPHINA THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & N. K. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ L. A. A. No.94 of 2006 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 10th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J The appeal comes up in the defect list. It is submitted by Sri.Alan Papali that Sri.B.S.Krishnan is no longer the Standing Counsel for the Requisitioning Authority and that M/s M.K.Damodaran Associates of which he is a constituent is the present Standing Counsel. He submitted that he does not have any papers with him. On going through the impugned judgment, we find that the enhancement granted by the Reference Court is limited to 45% over what is awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. This Court has in other cases approved enhancement at that rate. We are, therefore, not inclined to entertain this appeal further. The appeal will stand rejected. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE N. K. BALAKRISHNAN JUDGE kns/- -2-