IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6550 OF 2008 DATE OF DECISION : September 10, 2009. Parties Name Devender Rathee ...PETITIONER VERSUS Haryana Urban Development Authority and others ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, AAG, Haryana, for respondent No. 1 and 5. Mr. Suvir, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 to 4 JASBIR SINGH, J. (oral) ORDER: In this writ petition, it is prayer of the petitioner that despite land of the petitioner having been acquired, the respondents have not allotted a plot to him, as per the rehabilitation policy for those owners, whose land was acquired. In reply, serious dispute has been raised regarding entitlement of the petitioner to get a plot. Counsel for the petitioner states that the calculation of share of the petitioner, in the land acquired, is not correct. To say so, he has made reference to a document Annexure P-9. By making further reference to the affidaivt filed by the co- sharers that they have no objection, if plot is allotted in favour of the petitioner, counsel for the petitioner states that allotment of a plot has CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6550 OF 2008 -2- wrongly been denied to him. Counsel for the respondents states that affidavit by the co- sharers was executed after the draw of lots. A Division Bench of this Court in Amar Singh v. HUDA and others, CWP 15433 of 2006, decided on November 29, 2006, by taking note of statement made by Shri S.S.Dhillon, the then Chief Administrator, HUDA, has ordered that Oustees Adalat and Apex Appellate Body be constituted to settle dispute(s) of the land owners regarding allotment of plot(s) against the acquired land. The present dispute can better be settled by the Oustees Adalat. In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of by giving option to the petitioner to apply for allotment of plot before the above said Adalat and if any application is made within three weeks from today, the competent authority shall decide the same within two months thereafter, as per law. ( Jasbir Singh ) Judge September 10, 2009. DKC