IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44405 of 2009 SRIDHAR PATHAK Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22.2.2010 KHAN Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case under sections 341, 323, 324/34 of the Penal Code and section 3(X) of the SC/ST Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no case under section SC/ST Act has been made out and co-accused Ram Murti Ram has been allowed by the court below itself. He further submits that there is no specific allegation against any of the accused. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, if the petitioner surrenders and pray for regular bail, the same would be disposed of preferably on the same day after taking into consideration that co-accused has been allowed bail by the court below itself. Let this order be communicated through fax at the cost of the petitioner. (S.P.Singh,J)