{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3019 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.464 OF 2002 Sanjay Ramesh Vaidya APPLICANT VERSUS Sau Aruna w/o Sanjay Vaidya & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. S.P.Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for the applicant Mr. S.R.Andhale, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mrs.V.A,Shinde, APP for respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 9th August 2010 PER COURT: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Issue notice to the respondents. Mr.Andhale accepts notice for respondent No.1 and learned APP accepts for respondent No.2. 2. By this application, the applicant has prayed to dispose of the criminal writ petition No.464/2002 in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. Copy of the compromise deed, which was submitted before JMFC, Ambad, is {2} annexed with the present application. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Considering the fact that now the parties have settled their dispute as per the compromise deed, the present application deserves to be allowed. Consequently, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “A” and stands disposed of. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/criapln3019-10 {3} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.464 OF 2002 Sanjay Ramesh Vaidya APPLICANT VERSUS Sau Aruna w/o Sanjay Vaidya & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. S.P.Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for the applicant Mr. S.R.Andhale, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mrs.V.A,Shinde, APP for respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 9th August 2010 PER COURT: 1. As the parties have settled their dispute in terms of compromise deed, executed before JMFC, Ambad and in view of the order passed today in Criminal Application No.3019/2010, the present criminal writ petition does not survive and hence disposed of accordingly. Rule discharged. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/criapln3019-10