IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 12807 of 2011 Date of decision: 02.05.2011 Sarup Singh and others ........ Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Manvinder Singh Bal, Advocate for the petitioners -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Although the prayer is for protection to life and liberty, representation (P-1) seeks direction to respondents No. 4 to 6 that they should not interfere in the land being cultivated by the petitioner. There is nothing on record to show that the land in question belongs to the petitioners or the petitioners are in possession of the same or the petitioners have a right to cultivate the same. In view of the aforesaid vague petition, no order can be passed. Dismissed. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 02.05.2011 mohan