IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8527 of 2011 GOVIND HARIJAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 25.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 14.09.2010 in a case registered under Sections 302 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the F.I.R. it is alleged that this petitioner and others have threatened the victim. The informant has clearly stated that after enquiry he came to know about the hands of the petitioner in the occurrence, hence, it is alleged that all the three named accused persons jointly came to informant's house. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the State that the occurrence took place 10.09.2010 whereas, the F.I.R. was lodged on 11.09.2010 but, on 13.09.2011 Sangita deposed as an eye-witness and alleged that the petitioner was the real assailant. Sangita Devi is non-else than the wife of this petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Rupesh being the daughter-in-law of the 2 informant has filed a case against the informant under Section 498A of the I.P.C in which the petitioner was the witness and as a retaliatory measure the petitioner has been implicated in the present case. The informant has admitted that he lodged the case after thorough enquiry from the neighbouring people but it appears that neighbours were also not the eye-witnesses. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court of F.T.C.-IV, Purnea in connection with Sessions Trial No. 1376/10 arising out of Jalalgarh P.S. Case No. 72 of 2010. Let the petitioner make necessary correction in the prayer portion. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) 3