N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ww/ w.P.(s.) NO. W3>(>O /2011 / PETITIONER: Umesh Kumar Panda S/ 0 Late Shri Bhikhari Panda, aged about 55 years, Lecturer (Sanskrit) at Government High School, Chakradnar Nagar Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1) ’ State of Chhattisgarh l WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. g/xrThe petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs .to ‘sfubmit as under : Through : The Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (0G,) 2) The Joint Director Treasury Accounts and Pension Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur (C.G.) x . 9/ 3) The District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) a/ 4) Principal, Government High School, Chakradhar Nagar, Raigarh, ‘District Raigarh (C.G.) I @ a? 3a WW, @ahqng,W ummmwwPCraWV-ww l/ zoo 311%?.! W (wig-«Km I. it is not disputed by b the pmties that the matter was taken up by the State to the Apex Comt but the appeal was also dismissed by the Apex, n upheldlng the decision 6f &e Tribmal to the e§ect that the Teachers} Assietant Teachers are entitled for regular pay SC from the (late of their miiial appointment. I l, . __*l.§_i_____ 0 C a am mW mix 1m mm Wax Wwf 1§ Fag? rm mm I ‘ a: aifam 311% ‘ $.34 HGN‘BLE MR. JUS’HCE PRITEIEKER DEWAKER 94.08.2911 Shri D.R.Pats1, counsel r thE patitionsr, x , Smt. Smita Ghai, BL. f0 £116 State. Grievancé of the petitio m” in the gmsent pe‘fition is that the petitiomw was appoinmd 's A$siStam Teach€r on a fmad pay scale: of Rs. 100 for a pen'od of two yaars axxd after campletion of probationg ha as gramtad regular pay scale. 0f RS. 169—300. (V. Contciition of the coun e1 for the .petitianer is that he is entitlad for reguiar pay scale 'fh effect from the (Eats 0f initial and his case is quarely covared with numbar of appomtment decisions passsd by this Co and. also rim judgmeut rendsred by the MP. State Aéministrati e Tn‘buna}, Jabalpur én O.A. No. 2745/89 {Mmihukant Yadu 56 Others Vs. State 0f MJ’. & Others) where in it has men held that sim§ar1y §1aced teachers are entitled for regu :r pay scaie &om the date of their mma} appomtmem. XI-HC 78 x 9 3a WW, WWW—é WW WWW “=1 zoo m m Raf-$1121) r WWW WWW WW W?f 1 ‘ fgték (WK $aimané¥l 1n View of the abova su issicn made by th€ counsel for the parties, the petition is dis osed of in the same terms i.e. the petiubner is granted liberty to make a representation: if so advised, in the light of the afo said judgment and the Circular dated 13.1.2009 £31; 11.1.2011\( nnexure F72) and in tuna, the concerned respondexxt is direct d to consider their ease on its own men'te 83d in itS perspec ‘Ve. If the petitioner stamis on State tihukant Yadu (supra) emd Wmamr the same footmg as «yer der passed by the Administrative Tribunal in subsequently confirmed by the upreme Coert. £11 Special Leave Petition (Civit) NO. 6892/93 y order dated 03.01.95, the petitioner may be entitled to It is expected mm the S te authorities to pase suitable order after due scrutiny of the f cts. relief accerdingly. e it is made clear that th' opinion 0o the merits of the ca would be at liberty to decide accordance with law. court has not expressed any se and the authority concerned the representation strictly in _ Sd/— Pritinker Diwakar Judge b r a s