C.R.No. 2000 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No. 2000 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision 04.05.2011 Sita Rani Petitioner versus Kamal Nain Sharma and others Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Baljinder Singh,Advocate,for the petitioner. Mr.S.C.Chhabra, for the respondent. *** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner-tenant did not argue the revision on merits but seeks some time to vacate the demised premises. In this view of the matter, the present revision petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner-tenant is granted one year and three months' time to vacate the demised premises, as agreed by learned counsel for the landlord. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, has stated at the bar that he would vacate the demised premises on 5.8.2012. At this stage, learned counsel for the landlord has submitted that on the last date of hearing, the tenant had tendered a sum of `10,000/- in Court towards rent which was received by the landlord but a sum of `2800/- was paid in excess, which he shall C.R.No. 2000 of 2011 (O&M) 2 adjust towards the future rent. In view thereof, this petition is disposed of subject to a condition that the tenant shall furnish undertaking before the Rent Controller within fifteen days of the receipt of certified copy of this order that he will hand over the vacant possession to the landlord of the demised premises on or before 5.8.2012. He would also make the payment of future rent till 5.8.2012, if the above tendered amount falls short. It is further made clear that in case there is a violation of the undertaking given to the Rent Controller, then the tenant shall be liable under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 04.05.2011 JUDGE Anoop