Crl.M. No. M- 7786 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M- 7786 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 1.6.2011 ... Chando Rani ................Petitioner vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. K.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner Sh.Amandeep Singh Rai, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Sh.P.K.S. Phoolka, Advocate for the complainant. ... K.C. Puri, J. The allegation against the petitioner is that she alongwith her husband and daughter had committed the murder of Parveen Kumar. Motive for the occurrence was stated to be that deceased had illicit relations with the daughter of the petitioner. The gravity of offence does not make out a case for grant of bail. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no evidence and on that account the petitioner is entitled to the Crl.M. No. M- 7786 of 2011 -2- concession of bail. However, I have considered the said submission. The case is stated to be fixed for recording the statement of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. All the evidence has been recorded. This Court could not appreciate the evidence at this stage. The trial Court is the only Court, where the evidence is to be appreciated. So, no ground for grant of bail is made out. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed. ( K.C. Puri ) 1.6.2011 Judge chugh