CWP No.12893 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CWP No.12893 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.07.2011 Tarsem Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Ms. Naiya Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. ... Alok Singh, J.(Oral) CWP No.12893 of 2011 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner has very fairly stated that she is not intending to challenge the suspension of the petitioner in view of Section 20(3) of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, however, petitioner cannot be removed from the post of Sarpanch because, for removal of the petitioner from the post of Sarpanch, conviction is sine quo non as per Section 208 of the Act. She further contends that no removal order can be passed under the Act during the pendency of the trial. Therefore, she may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to take appropriate legal action, if any removal order is passed against the petitioner in violation of Section 208 of the Act. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 22.07.2011 sk.