IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION {227LNO, . ^^•••0^%. cy'" ^^fy\>~ RESPONDENT/ Ei .^ 'f 1 2008. VERSUS Kr.i.ti Bharatdwaj W/o. Shri Khomendra Bharatdwaj, aged about- 24 years, Village Semra(D), Post Dahi, Potice Station- Kurud, Tahsil and District- Dhamtari (C.G.) Khomendra Bharatdwaj S/o. Shri Manohar Bharatdwaj, aged about- 3t years, R/o.-Village- Bheja Maidani (Kaneri), Post Kaneri, Tahsil Gurur, District- Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA L- '^s.^ys^^ ••^ \ ^ T ^ y^ XI-HC—78 NWWI SbHKsb ^=[ •^II'MI?)'1!, ®fll'M'l<»,(q<fll<-l'J,< "^•^•...-^200 8 SII^T'q^T ('^3^?) sn^rqafyfR; W(I OT^I »li=n TOiTWdfeisntw HON^ SHRL_JUSTICE_N,K. Ai&ARWAL fd Shri Saurabh tiangi, counsel Shri Prateek Sharma, counsel With consent.of the pcrties, t| Ths instant petitiors is d )3-10-2Q08 passed by First Addifli iaipur, Camp Dhamtari in Civii vhereunder the petitioner's right ilaintiff's witness has been closed. The brief facts giying rise tb -he resporident examined his witnes^ •ime for his cross-examination o", ths Learned Tplal Court considerej \o cross examinstion of the petition^i It other wil'ness. : 1- : Learned counse! for .the petr 'he said witness: is essential for th eady to examine the same on any d '()i'<id41-i ^wvS ^ fs^t <r<it$it •*" ^i'sffinsii^i the petitioner-. or respondent. ie mstter is heard finaliy. rected agginst the order dated ional Principal Judge, i'-amily Court, >uit No. 36-A/2008 whereby and -o cross-examination of Deo Kumar rhis petition are that on 03-10-2008, &eo Kumar. The petitioner sought ground that her chi'd is not well, ; it as insufficient and close the right r and fixeo' the case for examination oner submits that to cross-examine just decision of the matter and is te which rnay be fixed by this Gourt ;lr .-? ~ . i^,i"K: ^o \ w^''.' "' XI-HC—78 's'si •<ii<iiinq,yalwis, ~fi«ni'M^< . t0.fC2-^^)A.f0.5-§.5~- VfWW 'SKWh 200 S sn^i 'v^; ('vfwvi) s'l^i^riviw '(TSTT ^TI^FI' sn*i)ch '/r^ TOIIW ;Hft?r a'n^i for which he is.ready to pay comp Sharmam, learned counsei forthe f\ Therefore; in the facts and| impugned is quashed and it is d towards costs, the.triia! Court shal the. witness of-'flespondent &eo | respondent, the Trla! Cburtshail j^ summons as per rules. The parties| Tric! Court on the next dats of h been fixed.' It is also made.cieap one opportunit/ To cross-examine ti With the aforesaid directiorl orjs +l^4lTl "WRfr -if [sl<il <Hn+$i< i?3ifin3ii^r snsatory costs. For that Shri Prateek espondent has no obj'ection. circumstances of the case, the order hected that on pay'iTient of Rs.200/- permit the petitioner to crcss examine luma.r and for thst if so desired by er'mit him to cal! such witness through are directed to remain present bafore learinq i.e. 28-09-2009 as has airsady frhat, that the petitioner wiil have only \ie wilness. ;, the petjtion stunds disposed of. Sd/- N.K.AgarwaI Judge