: 1 : Cri. Appln-208-11=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.208 OF 2011 Shri Deepak @ Shrikant Mahadeo Waghmode .. Applicant v/s. The State of Maharashtra (At the Instance of Sr.P.I. Baramati Taluka Police Station) .. Respondent ......... Mr. Kuldeep Patil i/b Prashant Hagare for the applicant ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 5th APRIL, 2011 P.C. : 1. This is the 3rd bail application filed by the petitioner. It is required to be noticed that the petitioner had filed Bail Application No. 2640 of 2010 in this Court. Same was pending. Today both i.e. this application as well as Criminal Application No.2640 of 2010 were on board. As the Criminal Application No.2640 of 2010 was called out, learned Counsel Mr. Deokar appearing on behalf of the petitioner applied for withdrawal of the same. Same is allowed to be withdrawn by passing appropriate order. : 2 : Cri. Appln-208-11=.sxw 2. It is noticed that the petitioner is trying to snatch an order from the court by filing bail application one after the other through two different advocates. This practice followed by the advocates required to be deprecated. Hereafter, if such bail application is filed by the petitioner, it will have to be placed before this Court only (Justice Mr. R.Y. Ganoo,) because earlier bail application filed by the petitioner was also dismissed by me. 3. It is required to be noted that there is no change in circumstances for the purposes of granting the bail application. When this was pointed out to the advocate for the applicant, he though it fit to withdraw this bail application. Hence, Criminal Application No.208 of 2011 is allowed to be withdrawn. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)