IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.33610 OF 2008 KANHAIYA PRASAD SHRIVASTAVA, THE THEN DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, MADHUBANI, POLICE STATION AND DISTRICT MADHUBANI. AT PRESENT, THE PRINCIPAL, ZILA SHIKSHA EVAM PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHAN, SHAHPUR, BEGUSARAI, POLICE STATION MUFASSIL, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SONJHARI DEVI, WIFE OF BINDESHWAR SAHNI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SURANI TOLA, BISPHI, POLICE STATION BISPHI, DISTRICT MADHUBANI ******* 2 08/07/2011 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed challenging the order dated 04.03.2008 passed in Trial No. 2567 of 2008, Complaint Case No. 944C of 2007 by which the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhubani has summoned the petitioner to face trial for the offences alleged to have been committed under Sections 341, 323, 354 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The complaint petition has been filed alleging that the petitioner who is the District Superintendent of Education has not paid the wages of his domestic employee and as such the mother of the domestic employee went to the house of the petitioner and demanded the wages. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the case is malicious and has been filed to pressurize the 2 petitioner to give a regular job in Government sector to the son of the complainant. It is further submitted that on the alleged date of occurrence, the petitioner was attending a very important meeting, which would be apparent from Annexure 2 and 2/1. In short, Counsel for the petitioner submits that the story is absurd and without any basis. These aspects of the matter may be considered by the Court below, if raised, at the stage of framing of the charges. For the present, this Court finds no reason to interfere with the order impugned. This application is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )