IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15392 of 2009 RAMJEE CHAUDHARY,S/o Jamun Chaudhary,resident of village- Amaithi,P.O.-Sarbadipur,P.S.- Gayghat,District-Muzaffarpur. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Prabhu Chaudhary,S/o Dev Narain Chaudhary,resident of village- Mahinda,P.S.& P.O.-Jandaha,District- Vaishali. 3. Sudha Devi,W/o Ramjee Chaudhary, resident of village-Amaithi,P.O.- Sarbadipur,P.S.-Gayghat,District- Muzaffarpur. ----------- 02/ 05-05-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that though there is allegation for demand and cruelty for its non-fulfilment and petitioner is the husband but after settlement of the differences a compromise petition has been filed on behalf of the parties and still petitioner is apprehending his arrest, which cannot be justified, in my view also. Accordingly, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No.2314 of 1997, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )