.^ y M m vmwc^ i .eaft_jMftBMit*. *w«.^SH__?a' 3SB»S, K ,F.HS. yiS98 jPETEEIONERi VB»S®» Sbiv ShaaKas TiwEi* »/o ^xi Saakatha pcasaa Ti.»-aEi»aged ,«beut 54 years. BcesideBA* fcbsil Saagfeaesb Sa»tfei« | geadEa Rosd,district-BU aspux; E/a Hew Bas Sfceaad, pen^ra Sead. Peadr*, dlstEiet-BilaspUE<,KP. l.Stata ef M.i'** throu^b- Sehool Bdaeatioa BepaEtaent Mad^-» pradesh<Bhopal. 2«enBBissi©tteE,E&blie last.BEctions (Bducatiea) HaSbya I>ca6esb,Bhopal. 3.&ssistaat CGBunissieaeE Adivasi vik.as Bil«spar» aisttiet BlliaspuE.H.P* 4.GollectoE vil»spwCt distriet Bilaspuc. S.&ssist.uat Direct®r (Educatioa) Bil«spttE» elisteiet BilaspuE,lil.l>. a E'ETXTION tJBBSE, A&TICLE 226 OP TBE COSaTXTOTIQM OF iHBflii, >»itl.. -i ..tU.:.^ w, it;i,t.i!-t;t.t.(iBt,u£Adia(!ui&au>ia»a PetitiDncr Rcspondents HIGH COURT OP JITOICATURB CHHAmSGARH: BUASPUR Single Beach: Hoa'ble Sbzl BsOsh K. ^nlliotrl, J. W. P. Mo. 3786 OP 1995 Versus Shiv Shankar T^wari State of M.P & others None for thc pctitioner. Shri P&nkaj Shrivastava, Panel lawyer for fbe respondeuts/ State. ORAL ORDBR (6*- Mardt, 2006) The matter was caUcd fbr hearing twice. On bofh occasions, none appeared nor aay reprcsentation was inade on behalfofthe pctitioner. Accotdingly, fhe writ petitiou is disxaissed for want of prosecution. Sd;- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge B!