IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17711 of 2009 1. NILAM DEVI 2. KIRAN DEVI 3. MALA DEVI 4. KUMAR GAURAW @ KUMAR GAURAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 02.09.2009 Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse sections of Indian Penal Code including Section 307 IPC. It is contended that allegation against the petitioners is/are that when the informant along with the advocate went to the disputed plot for measurement of the land in order to prepare the final decree, the petitioners pelted stones that caused some damage to the car on which they arrived at the disputed plot. It is contended that absolutely no injury was caused to any human being including the informant or his counsel. Learned A.P.P. looking to the case record does not dispute the narration of facts made by learned counsel for the petitioners. Looking to the special facts of the case, this court is persuaded to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. In the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, let petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran Motihari in connection with Pakaridayal P.S. case no. 60 of 2003 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )