AB 231/2010 BEFORE HON\BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Heard Sri K D Chetri, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri B S Si nha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. This application under Section 438 CrPC, has been filed by petitioners, namely, Sri Madhurjya Phukan and Sri Gunin Phukan, seeking anticipatory bail, ap prehending their arrest in connection with Lahowal Police Station Case No. 139 o f 2010, under Sections 448/ 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Also perused the Case Diary. Considering the materials collected by the Investigating Officer, I am o f the view that the if the petitioners are granted anticipatory bail, the Invest igating Officer will be deprived of custodial interrogation. I am also of the vi ew that since the name of the assailants have not been mentioned in the FIR, the Investigating Officer may also require proper identification of the accused per sons. Hence, the bail prayer is rejected Accordingly, the interim bail granted on 18.01.2011, is hereby vacated. With the aforesaid directions, this Bail Application stands disposed of.