Civil Revision No. 4795 of 2008 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4795 of 2008 Date of decision: 23.4.2010 Punjab State Electricity Board, the Mall and another ...Petitioners Versus M/s Sadhu Singh and Co. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Sukhbir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.C.Chaudhary, Advocate for the respondents S.D.ANAND, J. The petitioners (Punjab State Electricity Board and Chief Engineer Thermal Design PSEB, Patiala) are in revision against order dated 13.2.2008 vide which the learned Additional District Judge upheld the order dated 27.7.2006 of the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Patiala, making the impugned award dated 26.12.1996 a rule of the Court. It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the arbitration proceedings were not competent at all in view of the fact that the parties had arrived at a consensual arrangement. Reliance, in support of the advocated view, was placed upon U nion of India and another Vs. M/s L.K. Ahuja and Co. AIR 1988 Supreme Court 1172. The plea deserves to be negatived. The reliance placed upon M/s L.K.Ahuja's case is misconceived on account of the fact that there is Civil Revision No. 4795 of 2008 -2- **** no parallel on facts between that case and the case before this Court. In the present case, there is nothing, at all, to indicate that parties had arrived at a consensual arrangement, Even in the grounds of appeal before the Appellate Court ( a copy whereof was placed on record), no such plea had been averred. The petitioners cannot raise the above indicated plea for the first time in the revision. The petition shall stand dismissed. The impugned order shall stand affirmed. April 23, 2010 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge