IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(C.G.) WRITPETITION A/0.............^/..^.^:..... OF 2002 Petitioner Resopndents ..-^-^Xl .".•'•'"c^'fa^ ^^y ;v> v.*' 6.^ (1). S.R.Nayak, Age about 32yrs. S/o Shri Dharam Lal Nayak, Residense ofT.P.Nagar, Korba, Distt. Korba Beurau Chief, Sangharsh Ke Sewar. (2); Sushil Kumar Agrawal Age about 28yrs. S/o. Shri Vishnu Prasad Agrawal. Residence of Bamhanidih Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) (3). Anil Singhania S/o. Shri Shankar Lal Singhania, Vill. Bannhanidih Tah. Champa Distt. Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) Versus ^,(-T). State of Chhattisgarh .Th. Secretory-Revenue Dept. •> D.K.Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) (2). The Chief Executive Officer, D.K.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) (3). Collector, . Janjgir-Champa.(C.G.) (4). C.L.Markandey Naib.Tehsildar, Champa (C.G.) (5). Dr. Mohan Lal Sahare S/o. Budgoo Sahare Cast . Mahra, Residence ofBamhanidih Teh. Champa Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) (6). Chief Medical Officer, Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) _,.,,--'' Writ petition under Article 226/227 ofthe constitution of India for issuance ofwrit in the nature of mandamus etc. and or the^pther writ or writs/order, directions. E-^ t 1[ '•s-^^s FXBfie-227!: ^'^gtgSpa'cSaBgj^iwya.j \.^^5^ l:t.-S?^".S^2-^^-5S-:^ ^&'^~^SSss^S\s3 • ;;asS^;- flrq'swaRiirai •m. •SII^TgiI • R-iii*'3:[@?[ :sti+lic^'-'9F?<f: ")- sn^i^iiw^rftB DB:H(m'Ue^^slliceE.H;N.K|m-anga,;C.J. •&. Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. G, Bha^oo, J. , 23.4.2003 Peutioners isy Sliri.Hanainait Respoiidents TSEb. 1 to 4 and |Agarwal; A.divoGate.^ ;• |- ;^ ^ :1.: ^byQr-N.E.SIiuHa.AdditiQnal Advoeafe'Cjeneral. The ^grieYaace;.of flie petiti' '- respondeirt .No.5,.}ias.encroached ^oeis in this 'petition 'is' tKat tlie some eonstruction. (Souasel fcr tH' submitted tliat the coastiTictioB w!ijch was put up on'liig ericroached part pf tfae park has been demolish^d by the Tehsildar, ECliampar-This act hasn<^ beeq disjmted.by th^cjounselfor tlie petmonCT^ fbr the respdndents fsfe. t td 4 aj respondentNo.4 hasissiieii'anoticet the respondent No.5, whielr is; .alstj) ;petitioBers^ Counse! ^for^ 'ifa& •resp^iulents • No. 1 to '.4 and' 6 ^ also ^l^i<rl^^ .-HFfc^ ^I^^ll ^[Sj-^R: '^;3lPtP:I'3:n^T, :^ ; ipon eBildren's paEk aad 'piit up *.' . .: • ^': .:.' '•• • ••:'••• ": ••'." :••'••••.''"'.•^.••"-••'•': respbndents Nfi-jl tb 4 aiid 6 :id' 6 lias also subiaitted tlia.t"t{ie ferTecbvery ofthe Bne.amouiit to not dispirted by cpnnsel &r,tlie •/' XI-HC-22 "^^wi?fe4^^i(6;:SRgiHy,, ,?;%tSTTTr^? "st¥-^t4°'N''B2^-" asi asi *ii*<?wainish :^ 2BO •i^fl' . 3)1^1351 K-iisb SII^F 5t>H\^ ^Ig^ ,'3n^il?CTwaf??( submkted fhatlhe Tehsildar would thepar£tQitsprigiiial,positi6ii.;1?liis In the circunistanees w8 areofl be dismissed aad the same is dismt any,1}erefBnded:fo:'fh&!petifioneTS.' vy -^A; c.' c. %w Sd/- ChiefJustice qil'llTl'fl-l *1l1<'lf'?''fte<3f <r°l*il<, '^T3i{SgH;3iT^r taKe'appropriate steps to 'restore submissidn isplaced Qnreoord.. the'opinion that ihi^petition IS.IB sed.^HQwever, secunty::aiaount if. Sd/- LC.Bhadoo ^ ^Ra^l r® ^ <(^- •^- ft^