(1) WP 4271.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4271 OF 2011 Bhiva Chaitram Bhil (More) and others PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors. RESPONDENTS AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8696 OF 2011 IN W.P.4271 OF 2011 Rajendra Gaybhu Patil and ors. APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. V.D. Hon, Advocate h/f. Mr. A.D. Shinde, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. Mr. S.R. Barlinge, Advocate for the respondent nos.4 & 5 ..... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 6TH SEPTEMBER, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent. 2. The petitioners by way of present Petition challenge the order dated 03.02.2011 passed by the respondent no.1, thereby granting approval for shifting the respondent no.5-school from village Rajwad, Tq. Parola, to Parola, Tq. Parola. (2) WP 4271.2011 3. The petitioners claim to be the parents of the students taking education in the said school at Rajwad. It is the grievance of the petitioners that on account of shifting of the said school, the students are suffering. 4. However, it could be seen that the State Government vide its order dated 18.8.2011 has directed the respondent nos. 4 and 5 to run one Bhagshala at Rajwad. It can thus be seen that respondent no.5 is required to run a parallel school at Rajwad, thereby running one section each from 5th to 10th standard. The said order also stipulates that unless and until a new high school/secondary school is established at Rajwad, the respondent nos. 4 and 5 would be required to continue to run a parallel school at Rajwad. 5. One Shri Chimanrao Patil, Chairman of respondent no.4 has also filed an undertaking stating therein that he would abide by the conditions as imposed by the Government vide its order dated 18.8.2011 and would continue to run Bhagshala at (3) WP 4271.2011 Rajwad till the Government grants permission to start a new school at Rajwad. 6. In that view of the matter, the interest of the students at Rajwad is amply taken care of and no inconvenience would be caused to the students of Rajwad. 7. The Petition is therefore disposed of by taking on record the undertaking filed on behalf of respondent nos. 4 and 5, which is marked as "X" for identification. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms with no orders as to costs. Consequently, Civil Application no. 8696 of 2011, seeking intervention also stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- [M. T. JOSHI, J.] [B. R. GAVAI, J.] arp/