IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3338 of 2011 BETWEEN Appani Lingaiah. ... PETITIONER AND Appani Rajaiah. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. V. SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent: --NONE APPEARED-- The Court made the following: ORDER: Petitioner, who is the plaintiff in the suit, had filed an application being I.A.No.767 of 2010 in O.S.No.66 of 2009 to send Exs.B1 and B2 for examination by the handwriting expert but that application was dismissed under the impugned order dated 29.06.2011. Hence, this civil revision petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. The affidavit filed in support of the aforesaid application is very laconic and does not even convey what the petitioner wanted to convey. Apart from that the suit is already part heard and defendant’s evidence is already closed and now the suit is said to be coming up for plaintiff’s evidence. The application filed by the petitioner, at this stage, without laying foundation for seeking such a relief was, therefore, rightly rejected by the Court below. Hence, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. The application for sending the documents for expert’s opinion, however, can be filed by the petitioner, if so advised, at a later stage after leading evidence in support of his plea that Exs.B1 and B2 are forged documents. In that view of the matter also no interference is warranted. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J September 9, 2011 DSK