IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14836 of 2011 RANJEET KUMAR @ RANJEET TELI & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in complaint case alleging offences under Sections 323,324, 380, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act but cognizance was taken under Sections 323, 324 and 380 of the I.P.C. The accusation is of making assault and committing theft. Though the case was lodged under Section 307 and Section 27 of the Arms Act but the learned court below did not find prima facie case for such offences. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the accusation of committing theft is against petitioner no. 4, Arjun Prasad @ Arjun Teli who on the alleged date of occurrence was on election duty. Moreover, the complainant has admitted in paragraph no.4 of the complaint petition that both sides are adjacent neighbours and there is land 2 dispute for which some complaint was made to the local authorities earlier. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Teli, Bindeshwari Sao @ Bindeshwari Teli, Sumitra Devi and Arjun Prasad @ Arjun Teli, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 451 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J. M. IInd Class, Nawada, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)