IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 4345 of 2008 Decided on: 30.07.2010 Parkash Chand …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Cooperative Bank Ltd. & Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate. For the respondent No. 1 : Mr. Tarlok Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondent No. 2 : Mr. R.K.Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the respondents No . 3 to 13 : None. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner is an employee of the H.P. State Cooperative Bank Ltd. He is aggrieved by the various orders passed by the respondent-Bank. However, in view of the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Chandresh Kumar Malhotra versus H.P. State Coop. Bank and others, 1993 (2) Sim. L.C. 243, the petition is not maintainable against the H.P. State Co-operative Bank. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed being not maintainable against the respondent-Bank. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to pursue his remedies, available to him in 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 accordance with law. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge July 30, 2010 (K. Attri)