IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14628 of 2010 1. SHANKAR MANJHI S/o- Late Dasain Manjhi 2. Ranju Manjhi S/o- Shankar Manjhi Both are Rs/o- Akhtiarpur, P.S.Bikaram, District-Patna Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 01.07.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are in custody in connection with Bikram P.S. No. 192 of 2007 for offences punishable under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners herein are father-in-law and brother-in-law of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the deceased was son-in-law of the petitioner No.1 and brother-in-law of the petitioner No.2. He submits that no enmity between the families has been alleged by the informant and thus there is no reason or motive for the petitioners to commit the alleged crime more particularly, in the circumstances that the deceased was the son-in-law of the family. He further submits that the death took place in the normal course. Taking into consideration the 2 circumstances and the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners, let the petitioners namely, Shankar Manjhi and Ranju Manjhi be released on bail upon each of them furnishing individual bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Sri Sanjiv Kumar Rai, Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Danapur in connection with Bikaram P.S. case No. 192 of 2007 subject to the condition that the petitioners would ensure their representation before the Court below on each and every date fixed in the case and failure on their part to represent the Court on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the Court below would confer liberty to the Court concerned to initiate proceeding for cancellation of bail bonds of the defaulting petitioner and for taking him into custody. Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)