IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH OCTOBER 2009 / 15TH ASWINA 1931 RP.No. 842 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.18492/2009 Dated 24/07/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- DINESHAN PUTHALATH, MOTOR VEHICLE INSPECTOR, DEPUTY TRANSPORT COMMISSIONERS OFFICE, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT SMT.R.LEELA RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA - REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORT (C) DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- R.P. No.842 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) No. 18492 OF 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of October, 2009 O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing on both sides. 2. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.18492 of 2009 is the petitioner in this review petition. He is presently working as Motor Vehicles Inspector in the office of the Deputy Transport Commissioner, Kozhikode. The grievance voiced by the petitioner in the writ petition was that though the Government had directed the Transport Commissioner to post him in a non-sensitive post in his native district, pursuant to the directions issued by this Court in Ext.P4 judgment, the said direction was not complied with. 3. When this writ petition was heard and disposed of on 24.7.2009, I proceeded on the basis that the petitioner was thus ordered to be transferred on reinstatement in service after revocation of the order of suspension. The judgment dismissing the writ petition was delivered on the erroneous assumption that the petitioner was ordered to be transferred to a non-sensitive post upon R.P. No. 842/09 2 his reinstatement in service after revocation of the order of suspension. I am therefore of the considered opinion that the judgment delivered by me on 24.7.2009 dismissing the writ petition requires to be recalled. In the result, the review petition is allowed and the judgment delivered by me on 24.9.2009 dismissing W.P.(C) No.18492 of 2009 is reviewed and recalled. The registry is directed to post the writ petition for admission as per roster. P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE vps