."i 33 # %. 23.09.2010 Present: Mr. Jaidev Sharma, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State with ASI Om Prakash, P.S. Patel Nagar. Mr. Deepak Joshi, Adv. for the complainant. +Crl. M.C. No. 3037/2010 * Petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 were married according to the Hindu rites and ceremonies in the year 2004. On account of matrimonial discord they started Uving separately. On the complaintofrespondent No. 2, FIR in question was registeredin the Crime Against Women CeU, Kirti Nagar, New Delhi. Now, parties have settled their disputes amicably before the Mediation CeU, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi on 21^^ j^ly, 2008. In terms of settlement, they have obtained decree of divorce by mutual consent from the court of Additional District Judge (North), Delhi on 2^^^ February, 2009. Remainingsettled amount of ^ 40,000/- has been paid by petitioner No. 1 to respondent No. 2 by way of demand draft bearing No. 975736 dated 28^^ August, 2010 drawn on Oriental Bank of Commerce, Dabri Road Branch, Dwarka, New Delhi. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified < 4^ In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, no fruitful purpose would be served by compelling the parties to continue to litigate a protracted trial. In the larger interest, I quash the FIR No. 669/2007 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPG registered at police station Patel Nagar and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. September 23, 2010 rb A.K. PATHAK, J.