IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.10765 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: AUGUST 26, 2009 Rakesh Beniwal and others .....PETITIONERS Versus Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam, Hisar and others ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL --- Present: Ms.Anu Chatrath Kapur, Advocate, for the petitioners. .. SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioners states that the respondent-Nigam in CWP No.2142 of 2009 had made a statement on the basis of which the said petition was dismissed as not pressed by passing the following order:- “Shri Narender Hooda, Advocate, counsel for the respondents, on written instructions from the respondents, copy of which has been placed on record, states that the ALMs/SAs, who have been engaged on contract/out source basis, shall be given preference by the contractors for engaging them on D.C. rates for six months. He further states that the other persons shall only be considered when earlier engaged ALMs/SAs having experience are not available. He further states that these instructions will be strictly adhered by the respondents. In view of the aforesaid statement, counsel for the petitioners states that she does not want to press this petition. Dismissed as not pressed.” In view of the aforesaid statement already made by the respondent-Nigam in the above-mentioned writ petition, counsel for the petitioners does not want to press this petition. Dismissed as not pressed. August 26, 2009 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE