AB 622/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K. MERUNO Heard Mr. N. Haque, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as wel l as Mr. B.S. Sinha, learned Addl. PP for the State. By this application, the petitioner, namely Nazrul Hussain Laskar, is praying fo r pre-arrest bail. The learned Addl. PP has also produced the CD of the case. A fter hearing the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties and on per usal of the CD, it reveals that during the investigation, it has been ascertaine d that the petitioner, Nazrul Hussain Laskar, had sheltered the accused, Babul G oala and the kidnapped girl, Smt. Rimma Sinha and in spite of intensive search a nd investigation, the said petitioner has been aiding in concealing the kidnappe d girl and the accused, Babul Goala. The petitioner has also filed an affidavit to the extent that the said accused, Babul Goala and the kidnapped girl, Rimma S inha, have entered into marriage and has filed the copy of the affidavit and the copy of the certificate issued by the Notary Officer, Hailakandi to that effect . Whether the accused, Babul Goala and the kidnapped girl, Rimma Sinha, have en tered into marriage or not is not concerned before this Court since the alleged case has been registered under section 366(A) and 376 IPC. Therefore, this purpo rted marriage through affidavit and certificate is not the material while consid ering the pre-arrest bail. Further, from the Case Diary, it reveals that the sai d Babul Goala and Rimma Sinha have been evading arrest by traveling to various places with the aid of the petitioner and the said accused, Babul Goala is yet t o be arrested and the girl also to be recovered. Granting pre-arrest bail to the petitioner will surely hamper the investigation of the case. In this view of th e matter, this anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner, Nazrul Hus sain Laskar, is hereby rejected.