:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 946 OF 1999 Jethalal L. Manjar and ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Bipin Ratilal Sakarwala and ors. ..Respondents Mr. Nitin Mhatre i/by Mr. A.K. Abhyankar for petitioners. Mr. S.Y. Salunke with Mr. P.J. Shinde for respondent nos.3 and 4. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. Date : April 26, 2007. Date : April 26, 2007. Date : April 26, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Not on board, mentioned and, therefore, taken on board. . Leave to amend to delete the respondent no.1. Amendment be carried out forthwith. . This petition arises from Obstruction Notice No. 4 of 1988 and the order passed in Appeal No. 87 :2: of 1998 arising from the said Notice. The present respondent nos.3 to 6 were the obstructionists and the learned counsel for the petitioners now states that during the pendency of this petition, the parties carried out negotiations and arrived at an amicable settlement. The terms of the said settlement have been reduced in writing and in the form of consent terms, which have been duly signed by the parties and their respective learned Advocates. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. . The learned counsel for the petitioners, therefore, prays for disposal of this petition in terms of the consent terms. . Prayer granted and the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the consent terms and the rule is made absolute accordingly with no order as to costs. :3: (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)