1 SB Civil Writ Petition No.1366/2009 Nitin Kumar. vs. Rakesh Kumar & Ors. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1366/2009 Nitin Kumar. vs. Rakesh Kumar and others. Date : 25.2.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.P Sharma, for the petitioner. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, though the petitioner's application was allowed by the trial court vide order dated 24.1.2009 but the trial court allowed the meeting of the petitioner with his son Bhuvans only at the place of residence of minor Bhuvans which in fact is residence of rival contesting party against which the petitioner has already raised serious objections in his application and the trial court has not looked into that facts stated in the application and pressed before the trial court. Since the petitioner's contention is that he 2 SB Civil Writ Petition No.1366/2009 Nitin Kumar. vs. Rakesh Kumar & Ors. pressed his point for meeting with his son at a place other than the place where his son is residing and that fact is not in the impugned order and the said fact is in the application (Annex.4) of the petitioner, therefore, the petitioner is given liberty to first move for review of the order dated 24.1.2009 so that the court below may apply its mind whether it will be just and proper to permit the petitioner to meet with his son Bhuvans at the place where Bhuvans resides. With this liberty, this writ petition is disposed of. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya