THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.18244 OF 2005 DATED 22-09-2005. Between: B.K.Ramachandraiah Achary and 3 others …. Petitioners And The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District and 3 others …. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.18244 OF 2005. ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the 2nd respondent in involving in the dispute, which is purely civil in nature, and insisting the petitioners on returning the pronotes executed by the 4th respondent and consequently direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners by calling them to the police station. It is the case of the petitioners that the 4th respondent has borrowed some amounts from them and executed promissory notes. When they demanded for repayment of the amount covered by the pronotes, the 4th respondent has approached respondents 1 to 3 and at his instance, the respondents 1 to 3 are interfering and insisting the petitioners on returning the said prontes to the 4th respondent. In the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of respondents 1 to 3, it is stated that neither the petitioners nor the 4th respondent has lodged any complaint at any point of time. Further, the dispute is of civil nature, as such, they are not interfering and harassing, as pleaded by the petitioners. Having regard to the fact that there is no evidence with regard to interference by the respondents 1 to 3 and also in view of the averments in the counter-affidavit that the respondents are not interfering and insisting for return of promissory notes, I dispose of the writ petition placing the stand taken by the respondents 1 to 3 on record. It is further made clear that if there is any interference by the respondents, contrary to the counter-affidavit, it is open to the petitioners to approach this Court. No costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY,J DATED:22-09-2005. Lrkm