[IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS WMT PETITION (S) No. 3435 of2007 1. Ghasiram Goutam Aged about 50 Years, S/o. Sliri Narayaii Prasad Goutain, Head Master, Primary School Kokanpur. 2. Chabilal Sahu Aged about 50 Years, S/o. Shri Bodhan Ram Sahu Assistant Teacher, Primary SchooS Paleva. 3. Prahlad Meshram Aged about 58 Years, S/o. Shri Patirain Mesliraiii, Assistaat Teacher, Middle School Udkuda.. All are at Block Charama. Distt. Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretar^', School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director, Public Instruction DepartiTient Raipur(C.G.) 3. District Educatioa Officer, Kanker, Digtriet Kariker(C.G.) 4. Treasury & Funds Departmeirt KaiAer (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjTIQN OF INDIA Present: 1. 2. 3. Sinele Bench : Hon'ble Justice Shri Satish K. AgnihQtn. Shri D.N.Prajapati, Advocate fortfae petitioners. Slni Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for theState/'respondente. (Passed on 22Ba day of June, 2007) The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioners are entitled to renilar pay scale vy.e.fthe date ofmitial appointment or from the date ofcompletion ofprobation period. Leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the'facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same as to that of in W.P.(S) No. 5976/2006 (SushB Tiwari and others Vs. State Government of CMiattisgarh & CWhers), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. ^ In view ofthe above-stated submissions made by learaed counsel for the parties,the writ petition is allowed in fhe same terms. No order as to costs. Ka-una Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge &. ^ ^^-••••^•^