IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3230 of 2011 SUNIL SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Although petitioner is named in the FIR but admittedly, the informant has not seen the actual killing of the deceased. It appears from submission of learned counsel for the petitioner as well as report of list and computer department of this court that having more or less similar allegation, co-accused, namely, Janardan Singh has already been granted privilege of bail by this court vide order dated 03.11.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 23895 of 2009. Learned counsel appearing for the informant opposed the bail on the ground that the aforesaid co-accused, Janardan Singh has surrendered before the court below whereas this petitioner was arrested by the police, so on the basis of aforesaid conduct, the petitioner is not entitled for bail. The further contention of learned counsel for the informant is that the petitioner as well as his henchmen are giving threatening of dire consequences to the informant as well as his other family members. Taking into consideration the above-said facts and - 2 - circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely, Sunil Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sessions Trial No. 183 of 2010 arising out of Wazirganj (Tankuppa O.P.) P. S. Case No. 156 of 2007 to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, (F.T.C. No.III), Gaya. It is made clear that the conditions imposed except condition No. 2 upon co-accused, Janardan Singh vide order dated 03.11.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 23895 of 2009 shall apply to the petitioner also. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)