?^R^ ? SEMi,^ ^ '( IN THE HON'BLE HI6H £OUKT OFCi-fWATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR & /2011 W.P. (S) N0. PETTTIONER RESPONDENTS ^.'-^' ^:^.. ^. ^'^ ^'^^' /^/rr •$•s' Ramphal Sahu, S/o Shri Sant Ram Sahu, aged dbout 55 years, Headrtiaster qt (Sovt. Primgry School (TrihQl Welfare &epartment) Sirli, Block- Pali, Distt.- Korba (G.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chliatl-tsgarh, Through - The Secretary, T|"ibal Welfare &epartment, &.K.5. Bhawgn, Raipur, Distt. -Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal WelfdFe Department, Korba Distt.-Korba (C.6.) 3. Block Education Officer, Pali, Block-Pali, Oistt.-Korba (C.G.) ^•' ^' ^- ^y' WRIT^ETrTTOhLyN6ER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSrETUTEON OF INDIA 1, P^RTICULARSS0FTHEPETI'!^ONEFL(S):- As per the Cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENT (S):- As per the cause title. 3. PARTICULAR5 OF TME ORbER A&AINST WMIChrTHE PETrTIQN 15 MADE. f>- ~.v^s^'^. U F ^^ .-'K^? r®'i'<" sjyy. XI-HC—7i •3:nt?! ^iT ft:'W 'tTE^ 3H^?[^^i^ WqCIT^iW^ 3~£T -^WW,, WQfif^S, hviWy. EA5rB(s)^.?/ /ii•^200 sn^r Tt?^l i, p^sr) ^giw^fefOT^i cbl^l<TFi1T1 t^^i ^ 'f^t' <^-^i< ^sifiiirsi'^i SB : Hon'bie Shri iWanindra Mohaife Shrivasiava, J. 09-08-2011 snn Anii singn Kajput, couns|pl ror ine petitioner. finaiiv. Shri Praveen Das, Deputy G((vernment Advocate for the State. With the consent ot leamed; counsei Tor the parties, the matter is heard The petitioner was appoint^d as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs.100-150/- in the year 1977. Afte| appointment. The matter was take Leave Petrtion (Civii) No.6892/93. 1 Supreme Court, upholding the dei successtuliy compieting me proDation penod, ne was grantea regular oay scaie. Learned counsei appearing fijir the petitioner submits that the issue invoived in ihe case is as to whether, the j)etitioner s entitied to reguiar pay scaie with effect from the date of initiai appointjnent or after compietion of probation period. 'he issue invoived herein w^s considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur jrl omers v. State of M.P. & othei's}\ wherein, it was heid ihat the simiiariy situated teachers are entitled fo regular p^y scaie with effect from the date or inftiai •i up to tne Mon'Die saupreme uoun in special 'he said petinon was dismissed by the Hon'bie :ision or tne iriDunal to me effect mat tne Teachers/Assistant Teachers are ^ntitied to reguiar pay scaie from the date of initiai appointment. Learnea counsei appeanng fipr tne petrtioner rurtner suDmiis tnat tnis coun, whlie considerina the same issu^ in Amar Sai Ram & Oiners v. State of ChhatSsgarh & Omers p/V.P.fS) iNo.4725/2006] Dy order dated 01/09/2006, aifowed the petjtioners to make a retresentation within a period often days, raising :I-H;:—. 7; Sff^l V ft-TOi (niaiT^iwm? . ^sr-<<i<ii<n'i<, •»Ti1<i< , fs<di'yy,'(. \jQfWv^) HIHdl flrqrai ?f •WI.200 3n^FiTr^ ('i?!d°'<f!t) wiwsfCT sn^i -5 ail their grievances and in turn, thj tne representanon in an oDjeciive of receipi ofthe representaUon. Accordingiy, the petitioner aii nis anevance, in me iiam OT me| and in turn. the concerned any, in accordance with law, on from the date of' receipt of the repr^sentation in view ottne roregoing, thi; ife concemed resoondent was directed to decide jnanner withm a period of 30 days from the date i& graniea [aroresaia respor|aent ;s airec 'kwtci'il-i 'wwff'? fe^t tFii^K ^atfinsd^T to make reDresentation raisin§ and circuiar dated 27/12/08, sted to decide the representation, if ;, Wiffiin a penoa OT tnree monms suDject to venncaiion or me Tacts. aisposea or. NO oraer as to costs. ManindraMohanShrivastava ludge