IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6392 of 2010 KAPILDEO MAHTO SON OF GANESH MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – GOKHULA FATEH PUR P.S. SIKANDRA, DISTRICT - JUMAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 26.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that there is no material against the petitioner, save and except, mere suspicion that petitioner was last seen with the deceased in the toddy shop from where they had taken toddy. It is further submitted that as a matter of fact, there is land dispute between the parties for which cases are pending in the court. Petitioner has been implicated in this case falsely. Learned counsel for the State is not in a position to refute the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jumai in connection with Sikandra P.S. Case No. 21 of 2006 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)