IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34480 of 2010 MANENDRA SINGH @ MAHENDRA SINGH S/O RAMENDRA NARAYAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 06.04.2011 Due to inadvertence in the order dated 19.7.2010 the petitioner’s name has wrongly been typed as “Mahendra Singh” instead of “Manendra Singh @ Mahendra Singh” Let the petitioner’s name be read as “Manendra Singh @ Mahendra Singh”. The order dated 19.7.2010 is modified to that extent. The petitioner was allowed bail by an order dated 19.7.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 23839 of 2010 since no serious injury had been caused to anyone and that the occurrence had been taken place on land dispute. However, the petitioner was required to file an affidavit that he is not an accused in any other case. It transpired that the petitioner was accused in other cases therefore, such an affidavit could not be filed and he remained behind the bar. The prayer for bail had been renewed on the 2 ground that the petitioner is the accused in 3 other cases but the informant disputes this fact and states that he is accused in 5 other cases. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that initially he was accused in 5 other cases but he has been acquitted in 2 of them, this may be verified by the Magistrate before releasing the petitioner on bail. Considering that the petitioner on merit deserves to be granted bail by the earlier order, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Khagaria in connection with Sessions Trial No. 158 of 2010 arising out of Khagaria P.S. Case No. 102/2009, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailors shall also state 3 on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)