1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No.4834 of 2006 Shri Milind Bhagwan Teke Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & ors. Respondents Mr.D.B.Sawant for petitioner. Mr.A.H.Palekar, AGP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. August 07, 2006. P.C. . Heard Mr.Sawant, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Palekar, the learned AGP. The appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed by the Respondent No.2 on 23/1/2006 and against the said order the petitioner has filed Revision Application under Section 138 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that neither the revision application nor the application filed for stay has been heard and decided by the State Government during the last about six months. Mr.Palekar, the learned AGP states on instructions that the revision application would be decided within a period of eight weeks from today. . Hence, it is directed that the pending revision application against the order dated 2 23/1/2006 passed by the respondent no.2 be heard and decided on its own merits and as expeditiously as possible but preferably within a period of eight weeks from today. . The petition is disposed off accordingly. (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)