THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No.850 OF 2008 Dated 01ST July, 2010 Between: …petitioner And …respondent THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No.850 OF 2008 ORDER: Heard both sides. The petitioner is the decree holder who has obtained a decree by determining a market value towards the compensation in respect of the land which has been acquired and in pursuance thereof he laid the present execution. The quantum and the varied periods are being disputed by the respondent herein. On filing of the memo by both sides, the Court below did not find fovour with the amounts as shown in the E.P and therefore directed the petitioner to file EP in a neat form. Hence the revision. The learned counsel mainly submitted that as per the principles as laid down in both the decisions in Sunder Vs. Union of India[1] and Gurupreet Singh Vs. Union of India[2] the matter requires to be reconsidered. There is no doubt in regard to the principles as laid down in the aforesaid decisions. However, the Court below was not right in directing the petitioner to file such E.P in a neat form. It is suffice to say that in view of ultimate principles as laid down, the petitioner would be entitled to interest on solatium. In view of the above, the revision is allowed. The matter is remitted back to the court below. The court below is directed to dispose of the matter afresh according to law and pass appropriate orders, after giving opportunity of hearing to both the sides. No costs. ________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO,J) Date:01st July, 2010 grk [1] 2001 SC 3516 [2] 2006 AIR SCW 5813