IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 4TH OCTOBER 2010 / 12TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 26458 of 2010(F) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- SMT. KAMALA, W/O.RAVICHANDRAN, AGED 38 YEARS,H.NO.X/1389, MUNNAR COLONY, MUNNAR P.O. BY ADV. SRI.N.M.VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE (R) DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR IDUKKI DISTRICT COLLECTORATE, KUYILIMALA,IDUKKI. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, DEVIKULAM TALUK TALUK OFFICE, DEVIKULAM. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SVS/ ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 26458 of 2010 F ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 4th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Prayer sought in this writ petition is to direct the respondents not to disturb the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property of the petitioner covered by Ext.P1 and to restrain the respondents from interfering with the above. Petitioner relies on Ext.P5 judgment, wherein this Court has recorded the submission made on behalf of the respondents that petitioner's possession will not be disturbed otherwise than in accordance with due process of law. It is complaining that this undertaking has been violated, this writ petition is filed. 2. Learned Government Pleader submits that although steps were taken for demarcation of the property, nothing has been done by them to disturb possession of the property of the petitioner. 3. Although the submission of the learned Government Pleader is disputed by learned counsel for the WPC.26458/10 : 2 : petitioner, having regard to the fact that so long as Ext.P5 judgment is in force, the petitioner is entitled to peaceful possession of the property, I direct that peaceful possession of the property of the petitioner shall not be disturbed, otherwise than in accordance with due process of law as held in Ext.P5 judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks