•f~) '-7 /: ^^- IN THEHIGH CDURT QF JUDICATURE AT BIL^IPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 2 2 2 J_ /2D03 PETmONERS 1. .^.^ ^'^c^ ^^'" ^y ^' RESPONDENTS /^-•'y .l^-^' ^c^cy--' ...••' .^^••••' * . <€>^ ~,P5-'' -VERSUS- ^2. ^3. • 4. • .^5. ^-6. ^7' Swam Jayanti Swa Sahayata Group througji its President Jogi Ram Donde, S/o Ram Prasad, aged 36 years, Occupation- Labour, R/o Village Gesdhpuri, Bloek Palari, District Raipur (C.G.) Jogi Ram Donde, S/o Ram Prasad, aged 36 years, Occupation-Labour, R/o Village (reedhpuri, Block Palari, District Raipur (C.G.} Bhagirathi Rathore, S/o Devla}, aged 30 years, Occupation- Labour, R/o Village Geedhpuri, Block Palari, District Raipur (C.G.) State ofChhattisgarhthrough Secretary, Department ofMines and Minerals, Mantralaya, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Secretaiy, Department of Industries, Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Collector Qitines), Raipur (C.G.) ChiefExecutive OfGcer, Zila Panchayat, Raipur (C.G.) ChiefExecutive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Palari, District Raipur (C.G.). Tahsildar, Palari, District Raipur (C.G.) Smt. Manki Bai Dhidhi, W/o Bhupat Ram Dhidhi, Ex-President of Swam Jayanti Swa Sahayata Group R/o Geedhpuri, Block Palari, District Raipur (C.G.) Jamunalal Sonwani, S/o Puranlal Sonwam, Ex-Secretary of Swam Jayanti Swa Sahayata Group R/o Geedhpuri, Block Palari, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226/2S? OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WMT. ORDERS OR MRECTION. " :i ^s^^iii '?^?^1^^ 11 01 B; PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS H1GH CQ^URT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.2221 OF 2003 Swarn Jayanti Swa Sahayata Group & Others Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Dy. Adv. General for the State. 1) 2) 3) ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 16th day of September, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that with the passage of time the petition has become infructuous, to which learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection. It is ordered, as prayed for. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Consequently, interim order passed earlier stands vacated and M.(W.).P.Nos.467/2004 & 502/2004 stand disposed of. SatishK. Sd/- Gowri