Crl. Misc. No. M-4004 of 2011 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-4004 of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 09.05.2011 Kulwaran Singh ..........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. SS Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioner. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. Crl. Misc. No. 7382 of 2011 Application is allowed as prayed for. Crl. Misc. No. 25319 of 2011 This is an application for placing on record Annexures P-10 and P-11. Application is allowed and Annexures P-10 and P-11 are taken on record. Crl. Misc. No. M-4004 of 2011 The present petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of Kulwaran Singh for quashing of complaint No. 206/1/08 dated 24.10.2008 and summoning order dated 29.7.2010 passed by JMIC, Phillaur. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that mandatory provision of Section 204 Cr.P.C. has not been complied with. He also submits that the present complaint is the counter blast to the earlier Crl. Misc. No. M-4004 of 2011 (O&M) (2) litigation between the parties as earlier the complaint was against respondent No.2 on the basis of which FIR No. 170 dated 26.9.2008 under Sections 326,323,324 IPC at Police Station Goraya was registered. Heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and have also gone through the complaint as well as summoning order. The argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the present complaint is the counter blast to the earlier FIR registered against respondent No.2 does not carry any weight. There are specific allegations against the petitioner and the case of the complainant is supported by the statements of CW-1 to CW-4. CW-4 (Doctor) has also proved on record the MLR and as such the oral statement has been supported by medical evidence. The argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner that mandatory provision under Section 204 Cr.P.C. has not been complied with is also contrary to the facts as the statements of witnesses, list of witnesses is also there. There is no merit in the present petition and the same is dismissed accordingly. May 09, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE