IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3560 of 2011 AJAY KUMAR SINGH @ AMAR @ CHANDAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR -------- 02/ 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Initially, case was registered under section 392 of the IPC but subsequently, section 395 of the IPC was added. The first information report was registered against unknown persons. In course of investigation, some persons including petitioner were arrested and it is stated that one mobile and some cash were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that seized mobile is not looted property of the case and so far as recovery of cash is concerned, the same belongs to the petitioner. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was put on TI Parade but he was not identified by any of the witnesses. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let petitioner, Ajay Kumar Singh @ Amar @ Chandan, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge I, Saran at Chapra in Sessions Trial no. 659 of 2009 arising out of Doriganj P.S. Case no. 57 of 2009. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)