CWseV BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH K W AT BILASPUR /“ 4 pf 3' J" In the Matter of w.P.No. \‘WM. /2oo3. PETITIONERv Janardan Pandey, aged about 32 / yeaps, son of Late Shri K.K. / V J .w.‘ ? K, , andey, occupation a — Service constable in D.S.B. (District Special Branch) Bhilai, Durg , Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh). wa VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through: Secretary, Department of Home, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. ate. of Madhya Pradesh, through Secretary, Department of ome, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, Madhya Padesh. Union of India, through : Secretary, Ministry of Home, New Deli. Director neral of Police, Police Head Quarter, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). Deputy Inspector General of Police (intellient), Gupt Warta), Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Superintendent of Police, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh). . i y , w TV St : H r h Ge g ( PETITION THE NATURE O RANTO; UNDER ARTICLE fix CONSTITUTION OF F INDIA MANDA'MUS. FOR CERTIO gI” OUO 2‘ 6 227 6F ISSUANCE OF‘f‘.‘ RIT IN THE I" WAR WW mmwmw m @ . @ W 200} WW Wm #WW i 1.7.2003 Petitioner by Shri Sushil Dubey, Advocate. State by Shri Rajssh Pal [(1631, Governumnt Advucate. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Add}, C6ntral Govarnment Standing Counsel for the Union of India Shri RS. Jha, Addl. Advocate General for the State of M.PV Heard finally. Counsel for’ the petitio 1e1(‘s) submits that they have supplied the copies of the petitions with Annexu'res to the comlsel for the State of C.G./M.P . and the Union of India. However, one extra :opy be supplied and the acknowledgements thereof bc obtained. Counsel for the petitione r(s) submits that these matters are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in W.P.No.2353/2002 (Mahesh 'Kumar Tiwari Vs. Union of India and others) decided on 28.42003. They pray that similar orders may be passed in these cases also as they are similar. It is stated that the statement is made at the Bar after due verification. Counsel for the respondents submit that the petitioners have approached belatedly and it is not possible to decide the [View XI-HC—22 representations by the Central 1“}ovemment within the time .N0.2353/2003 decided on 28.422003. Counsel for the pe ’tioners are not in a position to dispute this. They, however pray that their matters be considered. V Accordingly, reiying on th statement made by counsel for the parties on the instructi ns received, as stated, the petitions are disposed of with observations as made in, 'W.P.iVa.2353/02 (Mahesh Ku ‘ar ‘I‘iwari Vs. Union of India and others) decided o 28.4.2003 subject to the ‘modifieation that the petitioner , if so desire, may make a detailed representation raising t eir grievances alongwith the documents within ten days om today to the Central Government addressed to t e Government of india, Department of Personnel and Tr ’ning, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensio Market, New Delhi (State Reorg the representation duly support d by all relevant documents be also sewed on the concern d Department of both the States after obtaining the ack ’wledgement and both the States may forward the. same to he Central Government With their comments and the requisi e information and complete details in order to enable the C ntral Government to decide mafia schedule as mentioned in W. Loknayak Bhawan, Khan sation Cell). Said copy of ! i e ' n ‘ XI-HC«22 the representation. It is open m the C(entml Govemment to seek such further information from the State Governments and on Such requisition be‘ g made from the Central Government; the State Govern ems will supply the same. On such representation being m de, the Central Government may consider and decide the ame expeditiously by passing ‘ appropriate orders as deemed 1t and proper, in accordance With law. In View of the above, .W.P and I.A., if any, stand disposed of. Certified eopy as per rule . r $dl- Judge t Fakhrudd‘“