:gV »» (WK J UD ICATURE AT B ILA SPUR , IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATT I SGAHR . w.P. uni-57,2? /2002. : RAM LAL YADAW AGED 5 5 years Son of Sri Shiv Prasad Lab outer of Mahanadi Yadaw , J a 1 P rah andh Sub-Division I , Rudri , Tahsil & Distri ct gHThamtari Chhattisgarh , Resident of Korta, Tahsi]. Kurud , District Dhamtari . Chhat t i sgarh . PET IT IONER Shearsh @‘v / _, v1 Q Village Lohar—Pathra , Post { VERSUS. - 1. STATE 01.? CHHATTISGARH ;’ Through Secretary Department DKS Bhawan I Chhat t i sga rh . 2 . THE EXECUT IVE ENG INEER Maha‘nadi Jal Prahandh , Dam Division II , Rudri , District Dhamt ari Chhat t i sgarh . 3 . SUB —D IV I SIGNAL V OFF ICER , Mahanadi Sh ear sh J a1 P rabandh Sub-Division I , Rudri , Dhamtari RE SPONDENT S of Wat er Resouces Mantralay Raipur r Tahsil & Di strict Chhat t i sgarh . WRIT PETITION f” UNDER ARTICLE 225 FOR IssUANcE 'OF OF THE APPROPRIATE CONSTITUTION WRIT OFwmDLA ,‘WRITs . ORDERS , , ‘ ‘ DIRECTIONS ETC. ‘ Contd. . .2 w‘haumv'r 'XI-Hc- 78 WWW mmm mm(m) WWW 29—9—2004 Petitioners through their re State by Shri V.V.S. Munl' Heard. WWW f€ém taffmm 2. This batch of cases relate tt Resources Department. Since the similarilhey are being decided by 3. Counsel for petitioner sub1 iv deals wi’th Accounts of W Registration and Payment of Dz Para 4.003 reads thus:- 4.003(A) Casual Labow casujal labour gangs the < rolli which will Show the the work done and the amc r01 s ifnecessarv. maV be c (B) Permanent Gangs- \(a) (b) i (e) ,3 (d) (e) Any recruitment Io ré permisxion ofSE. La‘m 'empioe011Limled in spective counsel. iy, Dy. Advocate General. 3" .w" y > Gangman, Chokidar etc. ofihe Water luestion involved in all the petitions is this common order. nits that P.W.D. Manual. Volume l Cper mks and Stores. Para 4.003 deals w lilv Casual LabourxRegular Labour Gangs. 1r Gangs- When work is to be done by day ubordinate incharge shall prepare a muster names of the Wotk~people; their'attendance. tunt l pavable on this account. Monthlv muster ose'd after seven days \01‘ as convenient. gular gangs. will be clone only with the ut‘ers more than 58 V'ears ofage shall mt he el gang“ guar s. vd-’C‘ ; hat ith il XI-HC—78 x WW, m, W13; , WWW J Counset fol petmoner gab 2044/2004), the Addmonal Sec F/l3/1L/S/2000 has issued dire should not be allowed to work reféranco to the above letterh the / employees vide its letter dated per Annexure P-3 that the emplc 55 years are 1'. Chokidar (2) L Civil (5) Mali (6) Khalasi (7) Ge it was made Clear that the ordet daily wage employees and theV Counsel fol petitioner submittec 'on\a dam lon m Umon of lndla c andanothei: reported in 2003 (5 untied tha the as pg: amiexure P- (W \o “etary v1de letter dated 9 3 2000 bearing no. .tion that the daily vsage em$lovees labouis on attaining more than 53 yeam of age. In Govemment has clarified the category of the .5‘7-2000 bearing no. F/13 11J'31/Sa/2000 w iyees who should not be allowed to work attei‘ abour (unskilled), (3) Helper (unskilled), (4) ngnan and (8) Process Surveyor. In the letter. under reference will not be applied on other may be kept in service till 60 yeuis of age. that it is discrimination. He‘plaeed reliance nd another »v- International Trading Co. Ltd. ) SCC 437 and-State of Orissa and others —v— _ I Titaghuf Paper \lilh repooee i1 AIR‘xl985 SC 1293 During the Course of hearing the deuston of high C utt of M P 111 W P VO 3200 2003 (State of \ladhva Pradesh and others —v~ Smt Bhagwan Ba1 and another) dated 23 3- 4. It is submitted that they submitted that bv a notification, 1 e is no change in the Manual. He further nanual cannot be superseded. 2003 was also brouaht to the notice ofthis Court 6. Counsel lo: petitioner er dated 17 4 2000 as per annemre P 4 and ised diections that the order rther submitted that me Sat te Governmtrt . issued another direction Vide le direcung retirement of e‘n Oyees of \t at“ su r . p my;m (We?) mmW at?“ mm aream train“ 311%?! Resources Depmtmenl attaining t submitted that Department has ’subrmtted that they have been 2000 (Annexure P-2) and subs 2000 have not been eonsldered. , 7. Learned DV Advocate C ' ' xdecmon taken by the State on 1 /3 1/2004 whereby the age in 11 as 60 years. Theletter dated 16- the age of 55 years, are cancelled. He timber not been fair in removing the employees. He removed pursuant to notification dated 9«3- ,q'uent notitioation dated 174—2600} and'3-7- Fhere is not a whisper in the order. ' ‘reneral brought to the notiogf'of the Court the 6-8g2004 vide letter bearing no. F 14-53;] Ell. l Water Resources Department has been kept —2004 is quoted below:~ ‘y/v WW3e41/31/W/ a 2000. 0__‘. mWmWWW %%WWWW% mmfwhawtertei /Watrnmttmwm tmwwfmnnel mwwmmtenel eWEtWWWW Memn5s W Het.w*r‘izf5§éet%nwmil ' mam 09 03 ;/. ewcremti emm WWWW mammw WWWan 6? a? eng e En" 2W t 44; gM‘-‘ g;e—. v , ‘n—v WM . »: V 3 SEW m,1%mmg{ 67/ mm.p 7 x. kLoo mm(m‘0 mmw' mmm; " mmm Wamiffsétm $a‘mm m W (W) q/ R ag 7 7/WbA Wt 200 mafa‘am WEWI mfjW H W“, @rm'w%r% BEWW 1%mgWaom’T1géaawmgm Wa§w$n§mém§x§ww WW WW $aim3néw u,» Counsel for the petitioner ubmitted that inspite of this decision ofthe State Govemment dated 16-840 4, the department has not mkeli any step. In. last para of the above order, th State Goveimnent has decided that in the FublicWVor-e Depaitment, the a e of supermmuation be kept 60 ye‘ns as it was earlier- :xnc‘ after takmg/ epse th State Govermnent' be infemnd inmmiiatalv. The contention i3 ‘hat now the State Govenmiczit h > ' d-ecisicn and 1'11 spite oftha daC-isio x, they are not implamsming {he same. 9. d i0 be vpasSed by the 'Depa‘rmmnt. Let {he taken steps mid orders are requ / » diyected malt iill ordars are passed l lO. Sub ect to directions and bsewations made above, the petitions slaw-3 If. Consequently all dispQsed disposed 0f. 11. A'copy ofthis Court be pl e peiition’ers beailowed t9 commue. and 1.1%. also staz'ld pendixlg M.W e . ‘ed in all The connected matter a M/> In View of the order (iate 168-2004. the Department ought to have orders bepassed in accordance \ ‘ith the order dated lo-SQOQL‘L it is further i ‘ w: ; v a '