CWP No. 8912 of 1991 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 8912 of 1991 Date of Decision: November 07, 2011 M/s. G.E.O. Miller & Co., (P.) Ltd. …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Addl. A.G., Haryana for the respondent-State 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, Acg. CJ. 1. The instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for quashing of notification dated 16.12.1988 (P-1) issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity ‘the Act’) and declaration dated 14.12.1989 (P-3) issued under Section 6 of the Act. On various grounds, the aforesaid notifications were challenged and this Court had granted the interim directions vide order dated 12.06.1991, when the writ petition was admitted and dispossession was stayed. CWP No. 8912 of 1991 2 2. Mr. Kamal Sehgal, learned Addl. A.G., Haryana has placed on record a copy of the notification dated 29.01.2003 notifying the same land for acquisition for the purposes of SEZ. The Khasra numbers given in para 2 of the writ petition have also found to be notified under Section 4 of the Act. Mr. Sehgal, further states that this has culminated into award after issuance of declaration under Section 6 of the Act. According to learned State counsel, even the subsequent acquisition proceedings are subject matter of challenge before this Court in CWP No. 2568 of 2006, which in fact have been adjourned sine die. It has further been stated that in similar circumstances CWP No. 3590 of 1990 has been disposed of having been rendered infructuous on 30.06.2010 by this Court. 3. In view of the subsequent development, this writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. (M.M. KUMAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE November 07, 2011 Atul