IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.26639 of 2011 Urmila Devi @ Geeta Devi wife of Sri Kameshwar Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2/ 09.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 395/397 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code and section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. Considering that the petitioner is being sought to be arrested in the name of Geeta Devi, event though she is Urmila Devi, it is ordered that in the event of surrender of the petitioner, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in connection with Sessions Trial No.537 of 2006 arising out of Bairganiya P.S. Case No.9 of 2003, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Fast Track Court No.4, Sitamarhi, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C., and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if she is, she shall not be released on bail and further the petitioner shall undertake to be represented on the first date after cognizance if the 2 investigation in the case is still pending and in case she fails to do so, her bail bond will be liable to be cancelled (iii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after her release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (v) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)