HON’BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO S.A.NO.1291 OF 2010 DATED: 21.06.2011 BETWEEN: Khais Abdullah .. Appellant And Raj Kumari Chaudhari (died per LRs) and others .. Respondents HON’BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO S.A.NO.1291 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: Heard both sides. Perusal of record shows that both the Courts below have concurrently held that after issuing Ex.A.1-quit notice dated 15.06.2004, the appellant/plaintiff received rents and the mere acceptance of the rent after expiry of lease does not amount to renewal of the lease or waiver of notice seeking termination of tenancy. Further, issuance of second notice on 19.11.2004 does not invalidate the previous notice. It is rightly held by both the Courts below that two quit notices issued by the respondent under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act are valid. No, substantial question of law arises for consideration in this second appeal. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant undertakes on behalf of the appellant that the appellant would vacate the premises if some time is granted. Therefore, the second appeal is dismissed. The appellant/tenant is directed to vacate the premises within a period of three months from the date of this judgment. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ Date: 21.06.2011 R. KANTHA RAO, J kvrm HON’BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO S.A.NO.1291 OF 2010 DATE: 21.06.2011