IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.R.BANNURMATH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER THURSDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2009 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 RP.No. 380 of 2009 -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WA.2518/2007 Dated 16/09/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/3rd RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------ CICILY KALLARACKAL,KALLARACKAL HOUSE KOZHICHAL PO, CHERUPUZHA, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.A.SALIL NARAYANAN RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT AND RESPONDENTS 1 & 2: ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. VEHICLE FACTORY ,MINISTRY OF DEFENCE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, JABALPUR, MADHYAPRADESH. 2. THE NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JANPATH BHAVAN(OLD INDIAN OIL BHAVAN) 5TH FLOOR, 'A' WING JANPATH, NEW DELHI 110 001 3. THE KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SISU VIHAR LANE VAZHUTHACAUD,SASTHAMANGALAM P.O. TRIVANDRUM 695 010. R1 BY ADV. SRI.MOHAN IDICULLA ABRAHAM THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.R. Bannurmath, C.J. & A.K. Basheer, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P. No. 380 OF 2009 IN W.A.No. 2518 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of December, 2009 JUDGMENT A.K. Basheer, J. This Review Petition is at the instance of respondent No.3 in WA No.2518 of 2009 which was disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 herein to pay a sum of Rs.2 lakhs in full and final settlement of the claim made by the review petitioner/respondent No.3. 2. In the review petition it is now contended that the amount fixed is unreasonable and totally inadequate. It was not fixed in accordance with the advice given by the review petitioner to her counsel. 3. A perusal of the judgment rendered by the Division Bench will show that both sides had agreed that a reasonable amount can be fixed by the Court. It was after such agreement that the Division Bench had, after considering the circumstances of the case, fixed a sum of Rs.2 lakhs as just R.P. No. 380 OF 2009 IN W.A.No. 2518 OF 2009 -:2:- and reasonable to be paid to the Review Petitioner. The Division Bench noted in the judgment that both sides had agreed on the amount. 4. We have carefully perused the grounds raised in the Review Petition. It has to be noticed at once that the review petitioner was represented by a different counsel before the Division Bench. This Review Petition has been filed through another counsel. That also, in our view, will dis-entitle the review petitioner to raise the present contention in this review petition. Even otherwise, we find no merit in the plea now being made by her. The Review Petition fails and it is accordingly dismissed. S.R. Bannurmath, Chief Justice. A.K. Basheer, Judge. ttb R.P. No. 380 OF 2009 IN W.A.No. 2518 OF 2009 -:3:-