$§é§i§i§ Bmgfwg CD C/Qwa IN THE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATrISGARH AT BILASPUR ‘r WRIT PETITION (S) No. é?£8 OF zqog PETITIONER Chhatlal Kashyap, S/o Shri I LakhanlakKashyap, aged about 40 years, Presently Posted as Patwari in Patwari Halka No. 22— Juna Bilaspur, Tahsi! & District Bilaspur (C.G.) ‘ VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Revenue Q7”A‘ / & D.K.s. Aapda Bhawan, Prabandhan Raipur Department, (C.G.) ‘yéxm ..... ‘ 2. The Commissioner, (Land Records) Raipur (C.G.) / 3. The Collector, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) / . . I ' ‘4. Additional Collector, District— Bilaspur (C.G.) i s. 5. The Tahsudar, Tahsii Biiaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA S1_.__DIAD:EICILI,A_D_C_QE:ELLE_DETTTTA l\I E D , , , " Arun PETITIONER H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BELA$PUR WRET PETmON (S‘) NO.6728 OF 2009 Chhatiai Kashyap Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petit§on under Articie 226 of the Constitution of :ndia) Single Bench : Hon’blie‘Shii Satish K. Agni‘notri, J. $hri Bhaskar Payashi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, Fane§ Lawyer fctr the State‘ RESPONDENE Present :~ ORDER ORAL Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that with the passage of time the petition has become infructuous. No objection from other Sade. Accordingiy, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become infrucmous. f Satish K. Agnihotri g p; Sd/— Judge Mo (Passed an this 5“ day of April, 201 1)