IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2007 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1929 WA.No. 879 of 2007() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.6969/2007 .................... APPELLANTS: PETITIONERS 1 & 3 IN W.P(C) ------------------------------------------------- 1. CHELLAMMA, W/O.LATE RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR, RAJESH BHAVAN, KAVUMBHAGOM POST, CHERUVALLY KARA AND VILLAGE, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK. 2. M.M.JOSEPH, S/O.MATHEN @ M.M.MATHEW, MANJAKKAL HOUSE, KAVUMBHAGAM POST, CHERUVALLY KARA AND VILLAGE, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.KURUVILLA JACOB RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS & 2ND PETITIONER IN W.P(C) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VAIDHUTHY BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KSEB, MAJOR SECTION, PONKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KSEB, MAJOR SECTION, PONKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KSEB, MAJOR SECTION, PONKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 5. KUNJUMON ALIAS SAJIMON, CONTRACTOR, KOLLAKUZHYIL HOUSE, CHERUVALLY POST AND VILLAGE, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK. 6. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM. 7. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (GENERAL) AND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KOTTAYAM. 8. RAJAPPANACHARI, S/O.KRISHNAN ACHARI, MUNJANATTU PUTHENVEETTIL, KAVUMBHAGAM POST, CHERUVALLY KARA AND VILLAGE, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK. R6 & R7 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.MEERA R1 TO R4 BY SRI.JOSE J.MATHEIKEL, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/05/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------ W.A.No. 879 of 2007 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 23rd day of May, 2007 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. After arguing the matter for quite some time, learned counsel appearing for the appellants seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ appeal. Permission is granted and the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is reserved to the appellants to file an appropriate review petition, if they so desire, before the learned Single Judge. Ordered accordingly. H.L.DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE vns