IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 432 of 1986 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3. Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of judgment? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- BHARATBHAI GANESHBHAI PATEL Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR IS SUPEHIA for Petitioner MR D.A. BAMBHANIA, ADDL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 1, 3, 4, 5 MR YN OZA for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 23/05/96 ORAL JUDGEMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr I S Supehia states that this writ petitioner has become infructuous and as such it may be dismissed as having become infructuous. The learned counsels for the respondents have no objection for the dismissal of the writ petition as having become infructuous. Order accordingly. Rule discharged with no order as to costs. ***