S.B. Civil First Appeal No.72/1983. May 11, 2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS ______________________________________ None is present for the appellant. Mr. Rajeev Purohit for the respondent. On 28.01.2009, learned counsel for the respondent informed the Court that the plaintiff Chanda Singh expired as long back as in the year 1985 and respondent Harihar Prasad has also expired in December 1990. On that date, learned counsel for the appellant sought adjournment to find out exact position. Thereafter, on the last occasion on 17.02.2009, none was present for the appellant. An application was thereafter filed by learned counsel for the respondent under Order 22 Rule 10A, C.P.C. and copy of the same was given to learned counsel for the appellant informing that the sole respondent Harihar Prasad expired on 01.12.1990. On that date, again time was sought by learned counsel for the appellant. Today, none is present on behalf of the appellant. In view of the aforesaid, this appeal stands abated. (Gopal Krishan Vyas) J. Ojha, a.