^b F^ •<)l'i<(«*!, »t(l«'16,RtMl«3< ^ p.^o^gS-3^ 3'd^B t'lOl ('jqE^alS'f) sn^w w R.fi'th TOTan^?r*'<i* ^awdfFaan^i '*14icl<fi'f WTCTf 41^^ TT'ft^K ^r aiRfti 3nt?r Deveiidija Shnvas, S/'o Late Sliri P.N. aged about 42 years, Post Assistant Shrivas; Grade w.'•ianianaKaia i.i.K L;litiatti$ V SS'Sliw SI R/o Noith Power House Road, Ambikapur, District Sarguja, Sgarn TS l. Statej ot cjtinatttsgarn, Utrougn Uie >tji^-i ^(t.dj. y, Mmi^ti-y, D.K.B. yiia.wan, Kaipur (CU) 2, Th." iii^ Btate, Vikag 3. The 1D"4L O/sl^ SJ.lcLK.SX Kore, 'sxnyTT1 WTtjfTivf\va VTiarvr^, ¥¥A^Aa £~aSs m x, a. &^f&v ^iv&fS'i^. i--*-<-4Tr r\^^^ ^-'G-Gpcrs.LivC ijcpHmiicnr Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Aiitvavashyak Sahakari Vitta Avaai M^fYQry> Ti^<s¥^7<a..4^+ TP^r^^iy //^n^ J.'ti.^cU.u. iV.lcxljyciu.At.^ r\.cUpLU ^v-/\^7j Couector, .+T-!1->T-^//^/^t^ Distt. Korea, -DcLLCi.^tlllJ.pUl ^'-/'^^ ^. Execititive Ulticer, Uistt. AntyavasttyaK -i Vikas Samiti Man'adit, District <h Bailcunthpur fCG) AftTICl-is* />f>*i Q¥?Tl?4Icl rtrtw<a'Tt?'r¥TJTt?rk^ fsa ^ss.t^s 'ta^B1 A a*uf ^/^r*%»?AS a ^ A s'u^Ai »F- iHUlA. 20-1-2009 BITTI AloK Uevangan, Aavocate, tor Uie peuuoner. Smt. Smit Ghai, Panel Law^'er, for the State. Heara. 'l'tie peuuoner lias tilea me mstant peUtion and nas praved tor cluTecuon to Uie ••espondents to pav the entire salaiT Ironi Aupust, 2U08 tiU d&te wim aiTeai's unposmg smtable /^\ I :-"XI-HC—78 3(]^F 'W (<•)!'•»> '^TT<RT^5T^^N> ^ 's^'^twvw, swftwfe, fsKiwy u,^C^^.^9^E>& *IWCW^»WWt aif^t 43t* ('yijdj^) TOIIWfffefSfi^I ^nfepN ^iwf 4 ft'st'^R?!T ^siRnsii^i interest upon mem anci tuiftner direction to uie respondents to allow ttie petitioner to discn&rge rus WOI'K. Unevance ot me peUti<)ner is mat wmie iie was worlang as Assistant Grade III in the ^Uice ol fhe District Antyawavasayi Cooperative uevelopment stood revolcea as per provii cnnamsganti civu Hervices Bociety, Kona, uaikunUipur, me •. respondent No. 'd put miT( und.er suspension vide order ot Annexure P-l. 'l'lie petitiotier was not paict any subsistence auowance cliinng ITIS susteiision. As no cnarge sneet was issued to me petiGoner wiUtui 45 ctavs, me orcter ot suspension .o I to sub-rule S(a! ot Kule y ol me (Classiticanon, Control ancl Appeal) Kules. Accorauiglv, me petiuoner gave ms louing on ^U-iU- 2008. However, the petitio4er was not assigned any work eveii atter ms louiuig aad no salan' was paid to Uie peunoner atter August, 2008. The petitiorfer submitted his representation on 27-11-2008 before fhe resp4>ndent No. 3/ChiefExecutive Oflicer ot tde UisUict ^'aiic-nayat, pionya vide Annexure r-'d. i-le also addressed a memo dated 3j-12-2008 to the Execunve Officer of District Antyav^'avasayi Co4>perative Society vide Annexure P-4 ana to tiie collector, uistt. ition.va vicle Annexure P-5. However, no action lias Deen tafcenj on ms representation. l-le ttirUier '^ ,'•-' XI-HC- an^T-^i^iw g'm aii^Fwia^ '3^ •^tllKrt^, afllwtS, fsK'll-H^i' Lof.c^^o.^9^ tWK ^»ESK 3!I^'T'<R%'(^°ffj<<^f) TwniT^fe»a»KW cti^«tlCT<il*i'5?Psi??f ^ f^^ <F^<^!< ^rsrfmsn^ suDmits tnat dunng pend^nc^' ot t&is peuuon, on 15-l-^uuy, tlie petitioner was sei-ved wffa a charge sheet dated 29- 11-2008. Leamea counsel tor peUtion may tse disposed ot wim liDenv to me peutioner to tUe tresn representation beior^ ttie responaents No. 3 ana 4 tor reclressal ot ms grievance, ^ responctents De du'ectect td responclents No. 'd and 4 me petiuoner suomits tnat uiis no may be turtner clu'ected to aecide ttie same wittun a specitieifl penoct and in ttie meanwmie, me aisDurse ms salan' m accomance witn law. AccQrcluigly, Uie instpnt petiUon is ctisposea ot wim a du'ection to tlie petitioner tb file fresh representation before fhe or redressaj. 01 ms grievaace along with a certified copy of Utis order wifhia 10 days. On such representauon beuig uea, tlie same wittun a penod ot the concemed authoritv' shall decide two weeks fi'om fhe date of receipt of the representation. In Uiejmeaiiwhile, the petitioner shall be paicl ms niont&iv salaiT ui ^ccoraance wi iaw. .—-- ^ta e! Sdl- ^dfa^sWa 3uA6(