IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27793 of 2008 SATYENDRA @ TORWA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 16.9.2008 Heard. Learned Judge who dismissed the prayer for bail of the petitioner simply appears not applying his mind to the paragraphs of the case diary and proceeded to dismiss the prayer, if one could say so, blind foldedly. Learned Judge has mentioned that a witness in paragraph-55 of the case diary has disclosed the name of this petitioner. The date of occurrence of the case is 11.7.2005 and paragraph-55 of the case diary is dated 10.3.2004 which is improbable and the date which appears under the signature of the officer is 10.3.2006 besides the content of that paragraph does not contain any statement of witnesses. As regards paragraph-45, the statement recorded in that paragraph is the statement of witness Sanjeev Kumar, who is the son of the informant, and that paragraph is dated 20.11.2005, i.e., after more than four months of the incident and still the name of the petitioner was not appearing in the F.I.R. Let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing personal recognition bond of Rs.500/-(Five hundred only) without any surety to the satisfaction of Sri Braj Nandan Prasad, A.D.J.,(F.T.C.-II), Jehanabad, in connection with S.Tr. no.128 of 2006 arising out of Jehanabad P.S. case no.194 of 2005. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )