IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR’@ E Cr. M.P. No. f5 )3 /2oo7 c312 PETITIONERS 1. Nemram S/o Satyanand Patel, w aged about 45 years 2. Shivram S/o Lakshaman Patel, aged about 4O years, Both are resident of Village Kavriha, Tahsil and District ‘Raigarh C . G. VERSUS 1. Uttam Kumar S/o Satyanand Patel, _aged about 50 years, Occupation Agriculturist, R/o ° a? Village Linjir, Tahsii and District Raigarh C.G. 2. District Magistrate Raigarh / s; ' PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CRIMINAL I l . /7r , ”PROCEDURE CODE FOR RESTORATION OF THE CRIMINAL /K EVISION NO. l PR.NO. 2119/07) u ” Zar R WW.A‘MPM.. 3 a 00 WW(W) :l‘af Mmmm ‘c'vzn 31wW Wgfmm WWtE‘WW $3if<wm Shri Ralmsh Panda], Advocate, for €116 pstitioners. klsard. 5y {his pexition, film 1 brimmal KEVlslon (HKJ N0. (Jourt 0n 3l-Y—ZUUY 011 Ul€ g away 01 bb days and no supported by an affidavit wa: U16 matmr was caimd, none—z Learned counsel for t1: rev1s1on cannot be (1151111856: )Etiti01161‘ has prayed for restoration of :21 19/ 2007 which was dismissed by this rounci that the revision was flied with a application for condonation of delay s fiioc‘i a11d aiso on the ground that when LppEaI‘Ed. 011 DCnaiI Oi H16 136Ui101161‘3. .€ p€tiHOll€rS SUDmltS illat U16 CI‘imlDal l iOl‘ WSIH. OI DIOSECutiOD alld m€ Sam€ 11aS IO b€ CI€C1a€Cl OD. mEl‘ltS. From perusal of the orgier dismissing the criminal revision, it is O dlSmlSSSG. aS UIE Sm€ \Vaw61T6d CIEaI' U131 U16 same “7&5 31$ $3: iiGWEi‘E §HRJ @HIREN_D_RA M Si—IRA J. PETITIQNERS l. Npmwm Sfo Sagianand Patal, aglsu anon: 4:) years '2. Shivram S/ o Lakshamar. Patel, aged ‘.a Bout 4U years, Eeth all: r€sirient Qf vmage Kawiha, TahSii and Disuici Redgarh (CG) VEK§U RESPG‘N'EEiqTE 1. Cttam Kumar S/o Satyalmnd Pam}, agEd 1’, ‘ « abcut 50 ysars, occu?aticn Agrir: AlturiSt7 h [o vmage Lmjn‘, 'l‘ajlsu an Ulsmct F Qioarh {CG} Z} \ I .2 L lstnct 1v1ag1stram, Ralgarh 14- 1 1-ZUU7 . WW mm u., WW (Wm agw * “amW . m1 Wm WW 31m WW . Wm “ a? 31m m ¥ with a delay of 55 days Without 131mg any application for condonation ‘ of d€iay. There is no ground for restoring the criminal revision. Tho petition is dismisse i h n 5d]- MlShra , if Dhirendra Judge