HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.9993 of 2008 Between: V.Nageswara Rao and another Petitioners And The District Collector, East Godavari District, Kakinada and three others. Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. B.Satyanarayana Counsel for the Respondents: Ms.G.P.for Co-operattion for R1 and R2. Counsel for the Respondents: Ms.S.Srinivas Reddy for R.3 and R.4 The Court made the following Order: HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.9993 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents in not considering the representations made by the petitioners dated 18.04.2003, 03.05.2005 and 28.02.2008 respectively requesting for fresh appointment as Electrician cum Lift Operator and Sweeper in the regular vacancies in the 3rd respondent-Bank is arbitrary and illegal. This Court, while directing notice by order dated 01.05.2008, directed the 1st respondent to consider the case of the petitioners also along with other eligible candidates for the post of Sweeper or equivalent category. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents 3 and 4, it is stated that the pursuant to the interim order of this Court, the Board of Management of the Bank had passed resolution No.11 in its meeting held on 31.07.2008 resolving to appoint the petitioners herein as Electrician cum Lift Operator and Sweeper cum Gardner respectively on temporary basis with a consolidated salary of Rs.4,000/- per month keeping in view their past service rendered to the Bank and since there are no vacancies in Cadre VI which is the last Cadre in the Bank. It is also stated that pursuant to the said resolution, the 4th respondent issued proceedings dated 18.08.2008 duly appointing the petitioners herein as Electrician cum Lift operator, Sweeper cum Gardner respectively and the petitioners have joined service on 18.08.2008. It is also assured that priority will be given to the petitioners as and when regular vacancies arise in future in Category VI. The above said facts have not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioners. In the circumstances, no further enquiry is necessary in the writ petition and the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 28-08-2009 Note: Issue C.C. in 2 days. B/o KLP