IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13940 of 2010 RAMESHWAR PRASAD SON OF LATE YUGESHWAR SAH RESIDING AT VILLAGE – KISHUNPUR P.O. SRIPATPUR, P.S. KOILWAR, DISTRICT – ARRAH. Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA. 3. FINANCE CONTROLLER NO.1, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA. 4. GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER, TRANSMISSION ZONE PATNA 5. ELECTRIC SUPERINTENDING ENGINEERING TRANSMISSION, DEHRI ON SONE SASARAM. 6. ELECTRIC EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TRANSMISSION DIVISION, ARRAH. 7. ACCOUNTS OFFICER, TRANSMISSION CIRCLE ARRAH. ----------- 02. 26.08.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the respondent – Board. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of July 2009 as Sansthapak Koti - 1 from the office of the respondent no. 6, all the retiral dues have not been paid with interest admissible to the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner is being paid only 90 percent of the pension and the balance 10 percent has not been sanctioned without any valid justification despite representation. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- 2 Board submits that the averments made in the writ petition as well as in the representation is not clear in order to consider the claim of the petitioner. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 6 with a copy to respondent nos. 3 and 4. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)