CWP No.10694 of 2010.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10694 of 2010 Date of decision : 28.05.2010 Tejender Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL **** Present: Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) The only prayer made in this writ petition is for directing respondent No.3 to decide the application filed by the petitioner for restoration of appeal dated 20.2.2001 in respect of Booth No.40, Sector 30, Faridabad, and thereafter, to decide the appeal on merits. It has been averred in the writ petition that the appeal was dismissed in default on 28.6.2001 vide Annexure P-3 and an application for restoration of the same was filed on 9.7.2001 (Annexure P-4), but that application has not been decided by the appellate authority so far. Learned counsel prays that a direction be issued to respondent No.3 to decide the application (Annexure P-4). In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is considered appropriate to dispense with issuance of notice of motion in the writ petition. However, the same is disposed of by directing respondent 1 CWP No.10694 of 2010.doc No.3 to consider and decide the application (Annexure P-4), if not already decided, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. May 28, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) atulsethi JUDGE 2