IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8176 of 2011 GAYA PRASAD ABHAGA @ GAYA MANDAL @ GAYA KUMAR ABHAGA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 23.05.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 23.10.2010 in a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the I.P.C. The F.I.R. was lodged on recovery of dead body of son of the informant. It is alleged by the informant that one day prior to recovery, Kiran Devi the wife of Rajesh Mandal informed the informant that her husband Rajesh Mandal and this petitioner are planning to eliminate the son of the informant. It appears that wife of Rajesh Mandal eloped with the deceased earlier. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except these, there is no direct evidence available against the petitioner. Kiran Devi who alleged to have given the name of the petitioner to the informant and Kiran Devi has not been examined by the police. 2 It is submitted by Mrs. Veena Rani Jaiswal, learned counsel for the State that there are circumstantial evidences against the petitioner as victim was seen in the company of the petitioner and others prior to occurrence. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur, in connection with BGP G.R.P.S. Case No.71 of 2009. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)