IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA! IISGARH A BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (g) No. £2 U“ (2008 VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh (/2. The Director. 3$ “ t 0»? Near D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. C.G. 3. District Ayurved Officer, Bilaspur, C.G. Shankar Lal Patel, ‘ Compounder / Aushadhai Sanyojak, Govern ment Ayurved Hospital Ghuma, District Bilaspur, C.G. - gyf if Lt. «ii ((6 C33 Gopiram Mandway, rS/o Shri Jhagruram Aged about i years, R/o Khutag at Tehsu Kota, District Biiaspur, C.G. Working as a Compounder, Government Ayurved Hospital JuniLine Biiaspur, C.G. Through the Secretary Department of Health and Family Welfare, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. C.G. Directorate of Ayurved, Yog, Prakritik Chi‘ktsa, Unani, Sldh evam Homeopathy (Ayush), 'iVNRIT PETITION UNDER A / RTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 6 g“ EINDIA I.» WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agm'hotri, J. Present: Shri Hemant Kesharwani, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. GA. for the State/respondents 1 to 3. Shri P.K.Patel, Advocate for the respondent No. 4. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 03¢ day of February, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents 1 to 3 submits that the yetitioner has already continued at the original‘place of posting for more than 11/2 year on aocount of interim order dated 26.6.2008 and granted by this Court Thus, the State/respondents 1 to 3 may be granted liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in view public interest and administrative exigency. Shn' Bhatia turther submits that the State/respondents 1 to 3 shall not insist upon compliance of the 3 impugned order dated 09.06.2008 (Annexure P/ l). In view of the above submission, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at this stage, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. In view of the above, when no eEect could be g'ven to the impugied order dated 09.06.2008 (Annexure P/l) on account ofthe interim order dated 26.6.2008, it is not necessary to go into legality and validity ofthe impugned order dated 09.06.2008 (Annexure P/l). 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed ofwith liberty reserved to the Statefrespondents 1 to 3 to pass appropriate orders keeping in View the public interest and administrative exigency, without insisting on compliance ofthe order dated 09.06.2008 (Annexure P/l ). 5. Interim relief granted on 26.6.2008 is vacated. i/, / Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge / /,¢.t HIGH COURT OF CHHATI‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3215 .of2008 PETITIONER ’ : Gopiram Mandway. VERSUS RESPONDENTS State ofChhattisgarh & Others.