1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.: 116 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 4065 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.: 6805 OF 2009 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.: 116 OF 2009. [Vasant Bhivsingh Pawar V/s The State of Mah. & Ors.] 1. We have heard learned counsel Mr. Gangakhedkar for the Petitioner for some time. He relied on a judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Bar Council of Delhi V/s Surjeet Singh and others reported in AIR 1980 S.C.1612. After arguing this petition for some time, learned counsel Mr. Gangakhedkar seeks withdrawal of the letters patent appeal with liberty to take recourse in view of the provisions of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, after the election is over. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as sought by the learned counsel for the Appellant/ applicant. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. 3. Civil application also stands dismissed and disposed of. [S. S. SHINDE, J.] [S. B. DESHMUKH, J.] Dated:10/07/2009. ans/116