IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3493 of 2010 MITHILESH SAHNI S/O BIPIN SAHNI R/O VILLAGE SOHARTHA, P.S. VAISHALI, DISTRICT-VAISHALI. --PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. UMA DEVI WIFE OF BHUPAN SAHNI R/O VILLAGE VIJAY CHHAPRA, P.S. AHIYAPUR, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. --OPP.PARTY 6 21.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant, carries allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc., besides having second wife who has also been impleaded as accused no.4 in the complaint petition. On previous date, time was granted after hearing to file supplementary affidavit stating specifically about the allegation of second marriage with accused no.4, Urmila Devi. Today supplementary affidavit has been filed but there is complete silence on the main issue though it is mentioned that court below has taken cognizance only for offence under Section 498 A but not under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code. 2 Considering the facts and circumstances, I do not find it a fit case wherein privilege sought may be granted. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad