vf INTHEHIGUCOUR'FOF.ntDICAtUREATailASPtMtfC.G.r WJ3.^ 227) No; ^d ( of201^ BETWE6N / Komaf Kjshor Agrcawal, aged about years S/o Mahavir Prasad Agrawal R/o Near Mahadev Laf Sanjay Kumar by pas road, Post: Chas, District: Bokaro, Jharkharid; af present R/o C/o Mahadev Agrawal, A-3, Annupama lnclave,Kashi Vidhyapeecth, Varanasi-2, U.P. PETmONER AND [- The Bocffd of Revenue, Ohhattisgafft, Ctrcuit Court Raipur, throuQh its President, Boardof Revenue, Chhaftisgafh, Bilaspur. Tehsit & DisWc}; Bilaspur, phhattisQarh. ^^- BhajanLal Ncn'athi S/o GendhM Vasnifc Nanciuram Marathi S/o Janvant Mankar; / ^ ^A- Smt Vimla Bai W/oTulsiram Kewat; S- Kawu flw-M sia pevfess^wi ^ -ss 6-fr Kumarj bat Ncu W/o Baturam; No Durga S/o Bablu Rawat; 'a-T* Ghanshyam Rajpuf S/o Ramsohag'rf; 5>'-e- Ashwani GondS/QAnkafhaThakur; /<'-9- 8adr? Kotwat S/o Ramprasad; - 2 tQl$>Qre resident of'tn front of New Gajmsincfi. Dharricta Road, [t No-9, Sikola Ourg, Tehsil &. District: Ourg, ^hattisgarh. RESPONDENTS PARnCUtARSOFTHEPEnnQNERs HIGHGOU^OOF<SWtMKl'^S<SftRHl^Blt^ VWITPETn-ION^227^N@.2010FE2a't1 RETmONER l^miEilKislior.Agrawat Versus , T'he Board ^^^^^^^^ R Gtihattt^arh, Circuit Coyrt Raiipur Ihrough its^ Presid^nt, BoardotRewenye, Chhatttsgarh, Bilaspurandothers. WRrTPBTn-l<^yNDER^tTlCI.£2!Z70FTHE ^.•<JONS'FffiUWNiWliSSDiMN^^^ (SinaleBencti: Hon'bleShnN.K.^aarwal.J.l Present i ShnRak^SahUiCOunselforthepetttioner^ •CWftt.-ORBER'.'.. ;. • -- '. . (Passeddn 1.4th dayofrdanuary.ZOII) Heardonadmission. 2. The instant petition ts directed against the order dated 12-07^10 passedbytheBOarelofRevenue,Bilaspureireult CQurt, Raipur in Revenue Revlsion No. R.N.i®5/RiW-7Qffi84/20Q dismissing the pelitiorier^ reyision and affirming the ordere of Adctitionat Coltector, Durg, Sub Oivisional Offtoer and the order of Tahsildar. ,- 3. Ttie petitioner flled an application under Sectjon 250 of Chhatti^arh Land Revenye Code before the Tahsildar. The 'Tatlsildar vide its ©Fder ctated 28-04-a3(» dismlssed the application. 4, All the Revenue Authorlti^ includina the Board of Revenue have affirmed the ab(^ order.^^^ T ctaiming title over the suit land on the strer^^ o^^^ alleged to be executecl fey his grahd mother Foir that, the petltioner's remecly lies befbrethe Civit Court. ^ order ampygniediis cont^n^, 1 d6 not find any ill^ infilroity, pas^dlby^ffirrning^lle concyrrent findings reeorded by all the Revenue Authorities warrantlna Interferenee in ...J' Kw exercise of Its e)draOFdinary^urisyiction under^^ 227 M the Constitutjor'i oflndia. 5. tt is well settled principte of lawthatthis Court, in exerolse of its super^ory jurisdictipn under Article 227^^^ (^^ Constitutionoftoaa,shoyldrefraini^tflTomi(rterferi^^w order passed bythe Court below,exceptin such caseswhere perversity, illegality.lrreguiarityorjurisdletionalerrorlswitterge onthefaceofthereGprd,WhlchlSn6tirrthepreserrtcase. 6. AccordinQly, the petition being devoid of substance is tiable to be and is hereby reiected. Noorder asto costs. Sd//- N.K.A^rawal Judge i\...