THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. Writ Petition (S/S) No. 56 of 2005 1. Pushkar Singh S/O late Sri Amar Singh, R/O village & P.O. Bhanara, Tahsil Didihat, District Pithoragarh. 2. Ramesh Singh, S/O Sri Tej Singh. R/O Village & P.O. Agera Tahsil Didhat, District Pithoragarh. 3. Liladhar, S/O Bhola Datt, R/O village Rangaon, Tahsil Didihat, District Pithoragarh. 4. Dan Singh, S/O late Sri Trilok Singh, R/O village Nimathi, P.O. Sandov, Tahsil Didihat, District Pithoragarh, 5. Madho Singh, S/o Sri Chanchal Singh, R/O village Agera, Tahsil Didihat, District Pithoragarh. 6. Rajendra Singh, S/O late Sri Nain Singh, R/O village Bhargoan, P.O. Atalgoan, Tahsil Didihat, Distt, Pithoragarh. ………..Petitioners. Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through the Secretary, Lok Nirman Vibhag, Uttaranchal Shasan, Dehradun. 2. Chief Engineer, Parvatiya Samanvaya, Lok Nirman Vibhag, Almora. 3. Superintending Engineer, 12th Circle, Lok Nirman Vibhag, Pithoragarh. 4. Executive Engineer, Provincial Division, Lok Nirman Vibhag, Pithoragarh. ……….. Respondents. Sri Alok Mahra, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Dated January 19, 2005 PC: (Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J.) Heard Sri Alok Mahra, learned counsel for the petitioners and leaned Standing Counsel, Who has accepted notices on behalf of all the respondents. 2 By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 7-9-2000 passed by the respondent no. 4 (Annexure- 2 to the writ petition) and further prayed for a direction to the respondents to pay the due salary to the petitioners in the scale of Rs. 2550-3200 along with other allowances. Both the parties have agreed that the writ petition is covered by the judgment of this Court in W.P. No. 236(S/S) of 2000, Pooran Singh Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others, W.P. No. 1257 (S/S) of 2001, Deewan Singh & others vs. State of U.P. and others, and W.P. No. 2039(S/S) of 2001 Kunwar Singh and others Vs. State of U.P. and others decided on 25th September, 2003 as well as W.P. No. 1601 (S/S) of 2004, Mohan Chandra Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others decided on 24.12.2004. Counsel for the petitioners has confined his prayer that the present writ petition may be decided in the same terms and conditions of the aforesaid judgment. Consequently, the writ petition is finally disposed of in terms of the judgment of this Court in W.P. No. 236 (S/S) of 2000 Pooran Singh V. State of Uttaranchal and others, W.P. No. 1257 (S/S) of 2001, Deewan Singh and others Vs. State of U.P. and others, W.P. No. 2039 (S/S) of 2001, Kunwar Singh and others vs. State of U.P. and others decided on 25th September, 2003 and W.P. No. 1601 (S/S) of 2004, Mohan Chandra Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others, decided on 24.12.2004. (B.S. Verma, J.) RCP