IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31050 of 2011 ============================================= Bipin Yadav @ B.P. Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ============================================= For the Petitioner : Mr. Yogesh Chand Verma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ram Vijay Singh. For the State : Mr. Narendra Kr. Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 2 14-09-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. No eye witness of the scene of firing, number of accused eleven, number of firing three or four and the previous enmity in between the parties are the points submitted to doubt the prosecution case and petitioner’s involvement but in the instant case, deceased was taken away in presence of the informant then after a little interval, firing was shot can never be doubted for the lack of eye witness, as about number of accused eleven exoneration of all can never be justified rather involvement of all is more proper. Reason for killing including motive was existing that land dispute was there in between the parties that has also earlier been taken into consideration while petitioner’s prayer was refused. Accordingly, the same is again rejected. Shailendra Bhushan Prasad/- (Mandhata Singh, J.)