1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. ARBITRATION PETITION NO.56 OF 2008 Caprihans India Limited. ...Petitioner. Vs. The Hindoostan Spg. & Wvg. Mills Ltd. ...Respondent. .... Mr. K.D. Shah for the Petitioner. Mr. Ranjit Shetty with Mr. V.Indurkar i/b.Hariani & Co.for the Respondent. ..... CORAM :DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. February 15, 2008. P.C.: The Arbitration Petition has been moved under Section 27 (1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for a direction to the Chief Manager of the Parel Branch of City Bank to produce and give evidence in regard to the interest charged and payments made by the Petitioner to the Bank and to produce records for the period from April 1995 to March 1997 in respect of the loan amount of Rs. 4.40 crores. In paragraph 1 of the Arbitration Petition, it has been averred that the 2 Petitioner has, in fact, produced a fax copy of the Bank Statement duly certified, but a dispute is raised in regard to the authenticity of the statement which has also been annexed at Exh.A to the Petition. There is no reason why the issuance of summons as sought should not be granted. The Arbitration Petition is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) with the modification that the required information shall be produced before the Arbitral Tribunal on 24th March 2008 at 11 a.m. at the venue which has been fixed, namely, 31st Floor, Seminar-II, World Trade Centre, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai-400 005. Judge' s order is separately signed. ....