1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.901 OF 2006 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO.95 OF 2006 The Commissioner of C. Excise .. Applicant. Versus M/s.Ispat Industries Limited .. Respondent. Mr.R.V.Desai, senior counsel, Mrs.S.V. Bharucha, Mr.Y.R. Mishra, Mr.S.D. Bhosale for the Applicant. Mr.P.K. Shetty for the respondent. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 3RD April, 2008 DATED : 3RD April, 2008 DATED : 3RD April, 2008 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the resopndent. Perused the affidavit filed in support of the Notice of Motion. The Motion is filed for condonation of 68 days delay in filing the above appeal. Sufficient cause is shown for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the applicant. Notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Notice of motion is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. 2. List the Appeal for admission after two weeks, subject to numbering. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.