IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 312 of 2008 Between: Kala Appa Rao, S/o. Venkanna, R/o. Patavala Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, East Godavari District, Rajahmundry, East Godavari. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer (Tahsildar), Tallarevu mandal, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 interfering with the petitioners agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 7.84 cents in Survey No. 363 in patta No. 1221 of Patavala Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District without following due process of law as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and fair play, and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner's agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 7.84 cents in Survey No. 363 in Patta No. 1221 of Patavala Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District without following due process of law. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.D.V.CHALAPATHI RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents 1 and 2 are illegally interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of his agricultural lands bearing Sy.No.363 admeasuring Ac.7.84 cents granted vide patta No.1221 of Patavala village, Tallarevu mandal, East Godavari District, without following due process of law. 3. A Counter has been filed stating that the said land is the patta land of the petitioner and the present Writ Petition has been filed on an apprehension only though there was no action of interference whatsoever, and the 2nd respondent never visited the said land and there was no interference and there are no proposals as on date for acquiring the said lands. 4. I am of the opinion that no further orders need be passed in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, recording the above statement, Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J 29th February, 2008 Tsy To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SPJS}