IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14444 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 16, 2010. Gurpreet Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Pardeep Bajaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks quashing of the memo dated 14.7.2010 (Annexure P-5) whereby the price of 85 LIG Houses situated at Ludhiana and earmarked for allotment to eligible riot affected persons has been fixed by the State Government. The petitioner's grievance is that these flats ought to be allotted to the general public on 'first come first get' basis in terms of the scheme launched on 22.4.2003 and in response to which, the petitioner had also applied. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned communication dated 14.7.2010 (Annexure P-5), which apparently suggests that these houses/booths are C.W.P.No .14444 of 2010 2 exclusively meant for the riot affected persons and the petitioner admittedly does not belong to that category. He has, thus, got no right to seek allotment of these flats. So far as the petitioner's grievance that no flat has been offered to him though he had applied in the year 2003, suffice it to observe that the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach respondent Nos.3 & 4, who, in turn, are directed to redress his grievance in accordance with the Scheme by passing a speaking order at the earliest. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 16, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE