THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.28576 of 2008 Dated:20.10.2010 Between: Nomula Sailu and others .. Petitioners And The Station House Officer, Manchal Police Station, Rangareddy District and others .. Respondents ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.1 and 2 in interfering with and threatening the petitioners with regard to the civil disputes between them and others, as illegal and arbitrary, and to direct 3rd respondent to register a crime against the 2nd respondent based on the complaint dated 26.12.2008 filed by them and to conduct a detailed enquiry. The case of the petitioners is that they are pattedars of the land situated at Japal Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and are cultivating the same. It is stated that O.S.No.132 of 2007 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Ibrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District has been filed by third parties against them and the same is pending. The plaintiffs in that suit filed a petition in I.A.No.742 of 2007 for police protection and the same was dismissed. As such, the plaintiffs in that suit approached respondents 1 and 2 herein to settle the matter out of Court. In that regard, the respondents 1 and 2 herein, time and again, summoning them to the police station to settle the matter. Since they are not interested to settle the matter out of Court, respondents 1 and 2 bore grudge against them and threatening them with dire consequences. Therefore, on 26.12.2008 they approached the 3rd respondent and gave a complaint, but no action has been taken against the same by the 3rd respondent. Hence, the writ petition. A detailed counter affidavit has been filed by respondent Nos.1 and 2 denying the allegations made by the petitioners. It is stated that a suit in O.S.No.132 of 2007 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Ibrhimpatnam, Rangareddy District, is pending between the petitioners and others, but, the respondents never interfered with the civil disputes between the petitioners and others nor threatened them to settle the matters out of Court. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Home. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents 1 and 2 not to interfere with the civil disputes pending between the petitioners and others. Further, the 3rd respondent is directed to treat the complaint purported to have been filed by the petitioners on 26.12.2008, which is part of the material papers in this Writ Petition, as a complaint and make a detailed enquiry into the same and take appropriate action as per law. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J 20.10.2010 KH