THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 17935 OF 2010 Dated: 17.08.2010 Between: Santhoshi Latha Enclave Welfare Association, represented by its President G.A.S.N.Srinivas ..... PETITIONER AND Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 17935 OF 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents 2 to 5 herein in not taking any action against the 6th respondent for removal of the alleged unauthorized construction made in the cellar portion of the premises bearing No.30-265/8/16/101, Sri Santoshi Latha Enclave, Venkateshwara Nagar Extension-2, Malkajgiri, Hyderabad is arbitrary and illegal. The members of the petitioner-Association claim to be the owners of the plots in Sri Santoshi Latha Enclave. Alleging that the 6th respondent herein has been making illegal and unauthorized constructions in the cellar portion of the said building, the petitioner made several representations including the representation dated 13.06.2009. Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents 1 to 5 in considering the representations of the petitioner-Association, the present writ petition has been filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 4. As the material available on record shows that the representations made by the petitioner-Association complaining about the alleged illegal and unauthorized constructions being made by the 6th respondent was acknowledged by the office of the Corporation, the learned standing counsel states that the same would be considered and appropriate action would be taken in accordance with law. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to the correctness of the allegations made, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents 1 to 5 to consider the representations made by the petitioner-Association and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law after giving an opportunity to the 6th respondent to rebut the allegations. Such exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. No costs. ___________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 17.08.2010 Ivd