1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.51 OF 2000 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr.N.R.Shaikh, learned APP for State. Mr.D.S.Bharuka, learned counsel for respondent no.1 to 4 (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 17th November 2009 Record and proceeding shows that rule was granted on 20/03/2001. By the present revision application, the prosecution has challenged the order of the Additional Sessions Judge by which the charges framed against the respondents were set aside. Today when the revision petition is came up for final hearing, letter received by the office of Government Pleader, High Court, Bench at Aurangabad by the Additional Commissioner, Food, for State of Maharashtra vide communication dated 13/11/2009 informed that the case was tried against accused no.1 and 6 and they were acquitted by the Trial Court by way of judgment dated 2 22/09/2009. In view of this, according to learned APP, now the present revision application became infructuous, and hence not pressed. In view of this, rule discharged. The revision application dismissed as became infructuous. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/NOV 2009/cri-rev-appl-51-00