IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20303 of 2008 CHHOTU SINGH @ CHHOTU @ AVTAR PATEL S/O-Birval Singh, R/O-Rampur Sarotar @ Khokada, P.S.-Goraul, Distt.-Vaishali. Presently resides Dighi Kala near D.C. College, P.S.-Hajipur Sadar, Distt.-Vaishali. …………..Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 7/ 10.11.2008 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel for the informant and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected twice, this is the third attempt. Prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected considering the fact that he has been described as the sole assailant of Rajesh Kumar. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the informant’s son has been kidnapped and the boy is still traceless. The firing was made to prevent the kidnappers from committing the kidnapping. So the case does not come under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, it has come under general exceptions. Considering every aspects of the case prayer for bail has been rejected earlier. Considering the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly his prayer for bail is rejected. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)