IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14555 of 2010 AJAY KUMAR TULSEYAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Raushan Lal Baraulia ----------- 2/ 26.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that allegations are apparently false. Business transaction is there in between the parties and not to return the dues, this case is lodged never justifying refusal of anticipatory bail. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 2249 of 1996, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M., Ist Class, Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)