'>' IN THE HON'SLE HE5H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH Cr. M.P. No. ATBILASPUR tl5^ 2A 1 b PETTTIONER Sanjay Ambashta 5/0 Shri M. 6. Ambashta,aged about 39 Years, R/o. &arriparo Ambikapur, Distf.- Sargujcf ( C.6.) RESPONDEMTS VERSUS 1. \$^ .'~.->''~...\-^'''' f^.v<"- ^^'^ 'L^v .-^& Stafe of Chhaff^isgarh, through, Sfation House Officer. Police Station- Ambikapur, District- Sarguja, (C.6.). 2. Rampyari Devi W/0 Chamru Lal Sahu, aged abouf 55 years R/0 Infronf of Shyam Medicaf Store, Sadar Road Ambikapur. DtSfricf- Sarguja, (c.e.) MEMOR/IN&UM OF PETTriON UN&ER SECTION 482 OF CRMUNAL P80CEDURE COOE FOR QUASfllNfi OF FXR. AS WELL AS CH/IR6ESHEET FOR CRIME N0. 47^ OF 2009 RE6ISTEREO AT POLK£ STATION AMBIKAPUR AN& ALSO QUASHEN6 OF THE PROCEE&IN6 FOR CRIMINAL CASE N0. 1772 of 3)09 PQsffiINe^ BEFPRE Oti€F JUMCTAL MA6ISTRATE.SAR6UJA AMBIMPUR. WWCH WBJVTES r0 •mEPETTTCONER. n ^l •'T'. », 'r. The petitioner named above beg to submit this Petition on the following facts and grounds: - teS;s?f:" •.-;:- ::'HlQHi3E^yi^®F^I-t8jSWSG^M^^MllJkSP(.lFt. (Hon.MKjustreefc^mltei'IElnwalceF) :Gr.l^mMo.|2Mof.284(>-:.^:1.''','',:.^^ .laE1'n'IGMER^:^:::l':l-:--.:',--;:;: ;'--.&-1^ '.ri:::',.'VtRSUS',"''.:"'':'-:'^ RESPONDENTS ^tate of ChhattisgarlTancl another' BSN; w H8B ? ^ Shr^|u^ ^r|^tt^eoyrreeI$torthe^R^ :;^;J:'.^St^P(^ge!r^E^asjp^^.i .isfoBir^p(^ ,.,..,.;::,^'.N<^ie:te^FespGJT^rtt;^o.%,thougtit^^^ ^PPI.ieffl^l©N.yNDE SEGTI@ <l^a(^1-H@^OE|ff(3i|=©(^l^^ V i^^:,NQiR2D,3SRs.^::;;^^'^'^-/1:::'^ :-€.^;;i<20|Oi^011:SS;.;:''.'^:^^r Witbffie^enserrtoftKep^^^t^^^ ^^^^^ TO ^PhaTO<^reiis^for^u^jng tfiie tslR^ ? Cnirie No; ^l^^%C^^T|gi^^|<i^^ g|^)ffences;lindeFsegtic^s^3^^B^(:i|^^tF%.Thfep^ .' a ... •'1 : ':;_^.'.''-~.^.:::'l.l^.''':-^s&IK$'i1^^^^ :..:'.-''•'.11' ga^ quashmentofthe (Srirninal^a^ ^ (^ijefJudiejal MagislTateSu^a.^robil^u^ C 2^^ ^ eyen ifthetprosecuticnRas€K^s^ mai^ ;oiA ag^n^ ^ petitio^ petitiorie^fi^StnitplypHrchasedttliestamp^^ ^ J^ibeeri rinierffloned in^ffie ee^ ^^;eve^|^|^^rrti^ialleg^on^^n,^he^RR" ^wl^sge^lsjl^^^againsthirnsHesf^ tt^polKig||ie||>eJ|lic»Rer?i^^o ma(ae^ ^ tia!SbeeRi[!-(^e|i||^|i|^|i|Hl^!|^^<^ume>htSi^<My^ S-'basis^Qf.alleg^iOt^les^lS^llBffiift^RinQ;.'^ ^•^ailnst|-;:M|n^^and^:.'¥eiy^||^FeBgB|^^ ll.pry^ution;': Y. ; :''.!'.:^,': ::/-:'^ it? »!: 9K ^:s,::' ii%^.; !^^:i ;:^- •2-'-1'' ; :.'• .,: -' ' ' ;•• 3. On the other hand opposing the case ofthe petjtioner^^^S arguedby^estatecQur^ihatthepetitionerh^beennamedinth&^^ alohg y^K othercQ-accused persohs and^a attnbutedtohim.^Mefurthersutim oflhepetitionerthattMelahywasadisputectlandfoFwhichaGivilsuitwas pending, in which senior a^^ engaged by the Gomplainant party and alf the relevant files and docurrferSs crfthelandwereinpossessionandkrK^edgeo^thepetK^ vretl avrareabouttheow^ershtpand^^^^^^^ appearslhatths petitionerhassoFnemonetaryinferesta|soaindther®ft»'e, the agreement was executed by him and Rs. 2,00,CX)Owas paid to the complainant and the presenf petitioner had further agreed to setl ttie said piece of land to one Kishori Sonj for consteieration ofRs. 72,00,000. He further stibmitsthatthe present petitioner Kas cpnspired alongwith other co-accdsed persons irrcludingffiestompvendortoche^ apoortadYt^Je^ingawHanclthisappearstohaW ttevaluablepEOpertyofthecomplainant.HefurthersubmitstlTateven beforethJsCourtthepetitipnerhasriotflledtMecompletechargesheetand documents as filed by the poliee. •^'. ' '.' •; " .'•' . '.'.'••". '•'' .: '.:• " .":'•. '••':. •• "••;'.'"••.•'-....• : ;.'':••'. • " "":-';'., •' '.. :•:'.;:, 4. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. .;,-:' ;, .:",.::; ^ ...-':•' . : ' :; 1''1 SFrpmtherecorditappearsthatthereiseooughmaterialarai^^ recordagainstthepresentpetitionerandhisinvolvementisveryappiarent. Law in r^pect of jnterferenee in a petitlon under sectlpn .482 of the Code ofCriminal Procedurejswell Settled. Present isa casewhere ita^eare that a poor lady has been cheated by the accused persons tnciuding tte petitioner by hatchfng up a conspiracy. The petltk^r hasfiied va^ docurrieritsinsupport6fthepresentp®tltionLbutm6stofth^eclocuments are subsequent docyments.v^h have been filett^a J'hedefence of the petitioner carmot be considered at^ petition heis no substance and the same is liable t6 be dismisseciand accordinglyitisdismissed. Sd//- Pritinker Diwaker Judge