{N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAT'HSGARH AT BIL£3PUR WRIT PETiTiON NO IO$ OF 2m) ?LIE u tnE in 1. £wadhesh Kumar Shrwastav aged 30 year Sic Rama Shanka! La! Shrivastav Rw Patna m§€t RZQRm {$5.} 2. Bhaghkranand Kushwaha aged 28 years Sic ¥iamdavar Kushwaha Rm Patna ms? "em. {c m PERTIONERS . THE STATE OF CHHATTlSaARH THRO’JGH CQLLECTGR Eixik‘IJNT?UR,_ §i§Ti KéWix iii) . THE CHEF EXECUTNE OFHCER JANPAD PANCHAYAT , BMKUNTPUR DISTT. KORIA {C‘GJ 3N ATTER GF: VERSLE RESPGNDENTS PETWION UNDER ARTICLE 22-6 i232? W; THE CONSTHU'HOE OF {HDIA / WNW/mg mm m 200 azwm (Wu) WWW gmwam WW#@W wmm %a?‘%q3név 25-6-2003 Shri Sunil Otwani, Advocaw for the petitioners. Miss Sofia Khan, Dy.‘ Gcvt. Advocate for the State. Hoard. Counsel for the petitioj‘lers submits that the present petition is not against a parucular order but the petitioners have tiled the present petition on the ground that the f procedure adopted by the respondents for appointment of the teachers on contract basis is hgainst the Rules and arbitrary. Counsel submits that petitioners submitted the representation (Annexure-P/ 1p before the Collector concerned which has not been decided. Having considered and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the opinion of this Court, ends of justice will be served if a direption is given to the petitioners to make a detailed representation before the competent authority along with a copy of the petition, Within a month KW J’ / /2000e—50,000l Xl—HC—78 31mm (Wm WWW ammm WWW ’2; WW§®€IW %ai§man%$r kg” from today, and on such representation being filed, the I‘ competent authority shall decide the same in accordance with law as early as possible preferably within three months from the date of production of representation. If any adverse order is. passed the petitioners may challenge the same in accordance with 1am With the aforesaid observations, this petition stands disposed of. In Vicwof the above: LA. No.465/ 2003 stands disposed 'of. Sdl- Fakhruddin 1 x Judge u’: ,U M‘P- No‘ [032003 Wm W200