^ C )- f 'a^ INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT^PETITION IS1 N0. €:f^ /2007 FS.B.1 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS .^y. ^y ^••'t^y" ^"'.<!)' ' ^y ^ //' % ^ 's^- ^^\^ '' Smt. Sarswati Bai Markam. wife of Fagnuram Markam, aged about 29 years, resident of village Darigawa, Post Sahaspur Lohara, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham [C.G.]. VERSUS 1] The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Mahila Avam Bal Vikas Vibhag, C.G. Raipur. / 2] The CoUector/Additional CoUector, Kabu-dham [C.G.]. ^3] The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Sahaspur Lohara, District Kabirdham [C.G.]. ^4] The Project Officer, Mahila Avam Bal Vikas, Sahaspur Lohara, District Kabirdham [C.G.]. ^5] Smt. Anusuiya Bai wife of Sewakram, aged about 26 years, Resident of vllage- Darigawa, Post Sahaspur Lohara, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham [C.G.]. 9V^^ o' ^ .^' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1] PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONEBL- HiQH COURT OF CHHAniSSARH AT B&ASPUR W"t PeS*JoR (sl No. 9S8 of2007 Petitioner : Smt. ^rswati Bai Marte'R Versus Respondents The State of ChhaUsgarh and others SB Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotrl. J. Present: Mr. Malay Kumar Bhaduri, counsdfor ths petffioner. Mr. SaSsh Gupta, E3y. Gcvt. Advocats fcr ths r»pondsnte,'Ststs. 1. ORD6R {Passed OR fess 2nttl day of Fsbruary, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submitethat the petitioner wants to withdraw this oeBtion. It is ordered accordingly. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as wittidrawn. No order as to costs. Sd/- SaushKAgmhotn Judge iiablu