IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10523 of 2011 MD. MURTUZA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 31.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and admittedly, the informant is said to be an eye-witness of the alleged occurrence. The informant has stated specifically against Mahendra Yadav and Ramawatar Yadav, who are said to be assailants of this case. It appears from perusal of the impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge that the name of this petitioner came in this case during course of the investigation as assailant. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Birpur (Supaul) in connection with Kunouli (Dagmara) P.S. Case No. 19 of 2009. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )