^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR W.P.(C)No.995/2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1 Gram Panchayat - Tikuiiya, Janpad Panchayat & Tahsi! Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) Through the Sarpanch - Smt. Rekha Sahu,W/o Shri Santosh Sahu Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Panchayat & Rural DevelQpment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2 The Collector, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 The Sub Divisionai Officer, Bhatapara, District Raipur 4 The Tahsildar, Bhatapara, DistrictRaipur(C.G.) 5 Neelkanth Sahu, S/o Jagdish Sahu, Aged about 36 years, Occupation - Doctor (RMP), R/o Village Tikuliya, Tahsil Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERART1CLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Mr. A.K. Shukla, Counsel forthe petitioner. Mr. Shasank Thakur, Panel LavvyerfQrthe State on advancecopy. ORALORDER (21.02.2011) W.P.(C)No.995/2011 ^ SUNILKUMARSINHA.J. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the provisions of Section 248 of the C.G. Lahd Revenue Code, 1959, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avait the statutory remedyavailable to thepetitioner under the law. . Permission granted; Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. ,- Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge r ySa^-