IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2010 / 30TH ASHADHA 1932 Crl.MC.No. 2551 of 2010() ------------------------- CRIME NO.95/2009 OF ANCHUTHENGU POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONER: IST ACCUSED -------------------------- SHAHEEN SHIHABUDEEN, SHAMLA VIHAR, VILABHAGAM, VETTOOR VILLAGE, VARKALA. BY ADV. SRI.P.A.AHAMMED SRI.M.SREEKUMAR SRI.THOUFEEK AHAMED RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT & STATE ---------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM RURAL, KOWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADDL.R3: SHANI ALIF, SHAL MUMTHAS HOUSE, NEAR MARKET, VILABHAGAM, VETTOOR VILLAGE, PIN – 695 312. (ADDITIONAL R3 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN CRL.M.APPL.NO.4249/2010 DATED 21/072010) PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHIK ADV.SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY FOR R3 THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.RAMKUMAR, J. --------------------------------- Crl.M.C.No.2551 of 2010 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of July, 2010 ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner who is the first accused in Crime No.95/2009 of Anchuthengu Police Station registered for an offence punishable under Section 498A read with Section 34 I.P.C. and the learned counsel appearing for the additional 3rd respondent/complainant who is the petitioner's wife. The matter is still in the crime stage. The only order which is called for in this M.C. is to permit the petitioner to go abroad for a period of one year from the date of his departure after leaving his local address as well as his address abroad before the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Varkala and also before the investigating officer. He shall also furnish the name, address and phone number of the local advocate before the Magistrate and the investigating officer. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will not cause any sort of annoyance or disturbance to the additional 3rd respondent wife who is Crl.M.C.No.2551/2010 : 2 : already in the U.A.E. If so, there cannot be any apprehension for the petitioner's wife. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal M.C. is closed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj