IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30401 of 2008 KANHAIYA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.8.2008 Heard. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and if one goes through the F.I.R. carefully one could find that there could not be any room for inducting any other name mentioned in it. The rejection order indicates that there had been some land dispute between the father of the deceased and the present petitioner. Learned Judge has utilized it for rejecting the prayer by recording that the petitioner could have the motive but could not it be on the other side of inference also, that for the said enmity petitioner could be implicated in this case, it is the contention. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Naugachhia, Bhagalpur, in connection with Bihpur(Bhawanipur) P.S. case no.213 of 2005(G.R. no.714 of 2005). sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )