IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27062 of 2011 1. Balram Sah, son of Late Jangle Sah 2. Sawari Devi, wife of Balram Sah 3. Birendra Sah, son of Balram Sah 4. Kavita Devi, W/o – Birendra Sah 5. Rajesh Kumar, son of Balram Sah All are resident of Pratapganj, P.S. – Pratapganj, District – Supaul. 6. Renu devi, D/o – Balram Sah, Wife of Raj Kumar Sah, resident of Hanuman Nagar, P.S. – Manumannagar, District – Saptari (Nepal). ---------- Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar ------Opposite Party ***** With Criminal Miscellaneous No.29755 of 2011 Raj Kumar Sah, son of Balram Sah, resident of Pratapganj,P.S. – Pratapganj, District – Supaul. -------- Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Priya Devi, wife of Raj Kumar Sah, D/o – Sitaram Sah, resident of Durgasthan Hardi, P.S. – Supaul, District – Supaul. --------Opposite Parties. ***** 02. 06.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 110/2011, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul. The petitioners are named accused in this case being in-laws of the informant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. The petitioner, husband, intend to resume and continue marital life with the informant who is one and only wife of the petitioner and further intends to pay a sum of Rs. 500/- per month by way of interim maintenance to the informant subject to any order of competent court on the point. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of filing an application before the court below stating such intention and start making payment, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 110/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition with respect to husband of the informant to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation or any default in payment, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)