IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. No. : 6757 of 2008. Decided on: 30.07.2010. _________________________________________________________ Keshwa Nand. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate vice Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge(Oral): It is jointly represented by the parties that the present list is squarely covered by the judgment dated 19.05.2009, rendered by this Court in Paras Ram Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, CWP(T) No. 7712 of 2008. 2. Accordingly, the petition is partly allowed. The respondents are directed to count the period of ad hoc service rendered by the petitioner before his regularization (i.e., 31.05.2000) for the purpose of pensionary/retiral benefits and annual increments. The needful shall be done within a period of ten weeks from today. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 30, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?