COCP No.1379 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Date of Decision:-9.10.2009 M/s Surya Cooperative L&C Society ...Petitioner Versus M.R.Sharma, Executive Engineer ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.Hemant Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): The grievance of the petitioner before this Court is that despite direction dated 4.5.2009 issued by this Court in CWP No.6727 of 2009, the respondent has failed to settle the claim of the petitioner and release the amount found payable to it. In response to the show cause notice issued by this Court, short reply on behalf of the respondent by way of affidavit of M.R.Sharma, Executive Engineer, Municipal Corporation, Gurgaon has been filed wherein it has been submitted as under:- “That in compliance of the above said orders of this Hon'ble High Court order no particular name of work was given in CWP however the then Municipal Engineer Mr.Bhopal Singh in charge of the work as reported that work relates to Sh.Chunni Lal Contractor to whom payment has already been made. The said contractor has also furnished affidavit Annexure R1 before the respondent, in which he has mentioned that the said COCP No.1379 of 2009 2 work was allotted to him completed the same and also get the payment and nothing is due with the office of Municipal Corporation Gurgaon. Hence the order of the Hon'ble High Court has been complied with and there is no willful and intentional delay on the part of the deponent.” In view of the specific stand taken by the respondent that nothing is payable to the petitioner, I am not inclined to proceed further with this petition. Rule discharged. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to revive the present petition if the stand taken by the respondent is false. (Rakesh Kumar Garg) 9.10.2009 Judge AS