l^iliii^liJiSi^BSSI^^ ^•Sl^':''";^wi ^^lp^ ^^ ^^-- m^nSB^I!^^<X»8Rlk@y^HHATTISGARH ATBILASFUR MISC.JUPPE^^^^l^ DivistoiTBenctf' ApraaAMir AN»UCANT ^. NirmalXlamarKaii Kaushik, Aged about 29 years, R/o Village Chu]^iat{ChhLilghat),P.S.-T^diatpur, District - BUaspur (C.G;).| VERSUS RESPONDENT )N-APPLICANT n KaushikW/oNirmalK^ Kau^hik, aged^^^a^ Dayaram Chandrakar Rjo^^^^^^V^ ChhiueiKhadaan^Village -JLaxam^ District- Rajnandgaon (G.G.) MEMO OF APPEAL UNDBR SBGTION 19 ( t l OF THE FAMIKY COURTS ACT. t984 | 1 ./i^"\ / '^^ss^ I ^ ^ -V HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH. BILASPUR CORAM: Hon'bleShri I.M. Quddusi. J. & Hon'Me Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra.J. MA.No. 700 of 2006 APPELLANT RESPONDENT Nirmal Kumar Kaushik. Versus DeepikaKaushik. Appearance: Non®for Ihe appeBarrt, ORAL ORDER (1W03/2011) of the Court wa? p^ist^ by Followino oral order LM^uddusLA Ust is being reyised. (^e iscaltecl <»rttwi(», l^ on^isu^^ press ttiis appeal: theret^.we have nQ<^r^w but to<lisn^ instantappeal for non-prosecution. In view ofthe aboye. theapi^alis dtemiss^for iwn-pi'^ecuUon. Sd/- I.M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge