IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18888 of 2010 SATYENDRA NARAYAN ROY S/O LATE MANKI ROY, R/O MOH. NORTH PATLIPUTRA BEHIND USHA APT P.O.+ P.S. PATLIPUTRA, DISTT. PATNA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIATE, VIKASH BHAWAN, PATNA. 2. THE BIHAR STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD (REP) THROUGH ITS ADMINISTRATOR PANT BHAWAN, BAILY ROAD, PATNA. 3. THE ADMINISTRATOR BIHAR STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD PANT BHAWAN, (REP), PATNA 4. UNDER SECRETARY BIHAR STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD PANT BHAWAN,(REP) PATNA. ----------- 2 19.11.2010 Heard Mr. B. K. Singh Chauchan learned counsel for the petitioner, State as also the respondent nos. 2 to 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 30th of April 2008, the retiral benefits of the petitioner have not been correctly calculated taking into consideration the period spent by him while serving in the Bihar State Agro Industries development Corporation. It submitted that the matter has been considered by this Court in its order dated 28th of January 2009 passed in C.W.J.C No. 16370 of 2004 as contained in Annexure- 12/1 wherein this Court directed to calculate the retiral benefits by taking into consideration the period spent by the concerned employee with the Bihar State Agro Industries Development Corporation. Petitioner also claims for payment on account of arrear of leave encashment. Mr. Chauhan learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 2 to 4 submits that the grievances of the petitioner would be considered in the light of the judgment as contained in Annexure 12/1. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner proposes to represent his grievances by way of representation before the respondent no. 3 with a copy to respondent no. 1. In case such representation is filed stating details of the grievances as also the copy of relevant document in support of his claim with a certified copy of the present order the representation of petitioner may be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four month on receipt of such representation so that the grievances may be settled to enable the petitioner to receive the correct and full pensionary benefits with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Amrendra ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)