'f 47 '< IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 793 /2011 & Crt.M.As. No.3006- 07/207r ASHISH SEHRAWAT & ANR ..... petitioners Through : Mr. Harvinder Singh and Mr. R.C. pathak, Advs. with petitioners in person. VCTSUS STATE & ANR ..... Respondents CORAM: Through : Mr. M.N. Dudeja, App for the State. Ms. Rekha Palli, Adv. for R-2 with respondent No.2/complainant in person. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI o/o %H#o' The present petition is filed by the petitioners under sections 482 cr.P.c. praying inter alia for quashing of FIR No.to2/2010 lodged by respondent No.2/comprainant, wife of petitioner No.1 and daughter- in-law of petitioner No.2, against the petitioners under sections 406/498A/3I3/323/34L/34 IPC registered with PS Vasant Kunj South, Delhi. While counsel for the petitioners contends that the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed as the parties have arrived at an amicabre settlement, as recorded in the SetUement Agreement dated 26.7.2010 arriving at between the parties in the mediation proceedings (Annexure P-3), respondent No.2/complainant, who is present in court CRL.M.C. 793/20II page I of 2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified 1_/ opposes the prayer. she is extremery agitated and states that petitioner No'1 has made her life and that of her two minor children miserable' She submits that even after the aforesaid setflement was recorded, petitioner No.1 physicaily assaurted her on 18.1.2011 and she had to rodge a compraint with the porice. she further states petitioner No.1 has stopped riving with her and the chirdren at the matrimonial house and has shifted to the residence of his mother. she further states that petitioner No.2 has filed a writ petition against her in this Court. Having regard to the aforesaid position, this court is not inclined to entertain the present petition. Further, in view of the apprehension of threat from the petitioners expressed by respondent No.2, the police is directed to take necessary steps to grant protection to respondent No.2/comprainant and the minor chirdren. The SHo of the area shall direct the beat constable to visit the residence of respondent No.2/comprainant with regurar frequency to ensure her safety. The petition is dismissed, arong with the pending apprications. MARCH sk HIMA KOHLI,J 7t,20II cRL. M. C. 793/2OrI Page 2 of 2