?J é) IN TkiB HIGH CGURT OF JUDI$TURE AT BILASHIR (C.G. w.P.Ne. 32$? OE 2002 BEMEN giant. Kadmu mi We what-an La}. agad abaut 50 years. R/avillage Paraada. 2.0. marani; iahsil rakhatpur, District Bi) aspur (C.G.) FETI TIONRR AND ihe tau mhattisgarh,throuh hé screry mrhnan e Panchayat. ks. mii ur. cossier. asp ivsi. Blnspur mmina Bilur Dim i am Pn os. ancarn Faea P. >> -mal aarbhata Distrct amr % dditanal .Galleetor. Bilsr e Ai .m. ia xev f Janpa Panchyat khtpur. REsmNms T ETON WEE RTCLE 26/ 9F TaE ‘WRI PTII R AI 2227 ‘I‘I DI ) s ef g g eta mt f m léng, Raip t. ooa emi.-n $rph,a; hhwt usada (mue) P..m. i lau wf Ecutie e£1¢cn d a Taa DT cwsITUIGN 6F mA XI-HC-22 Wm wt zoo raw XI-HC—22 WW W w-P»(\la.253 2mL l mm “WI 200 Mmmw <l' . Collector vide 0rd€r datCd _ found that proper opportuni remanded the matter. Agé preferred before the Commis grant ofstay. The application was rejected by the impugned order dated 21-1-2002. During th was abolished with etfect frOJ who had been given ofhci preferred the present petitir )n before this Court on 30—1—2002. The matter came up for hearing on 31—1—2002 and the Court directed the partiesto maintain status quo as on that date. Counsel for the partic post having been abolished Director of Panchayat. This petition has not been admitted by Bireetor of Panehayat. This‘ _ this Court and vide order d2 ted 31-1—2002, only notice has been issued. mmftfsdm $mm ‘LO— 12—2001 vide annexure P-2. He ty was not given to the person and dnst that order, a revision was sioner along with the application for r .s period the post of Commissioner 11 3 1— 12-2002. Petitioner Kadam Bai ‘ating charge because of removal, :s submit that the Commissioner’s , ,- now the revision lies before the revision is now to be heard by the WeW Shri Rajccv ShrivaStava submits that the matter is. s reported in 2002 (2) C.L.J,, Chhattisgarh «35 others) and o and proper. It is 21130 submitte that the petitioner has no locus. vThe petition has not yet bee admitted. Only an interim orden has been passed for maintainh 1g Status quot submit that Commissioner’s post has now been abelished. Having considered the faJets and circumstances of the case and’ material on record, withomt expressing any opinion on merit it is directed that if the petitio application for stay before th: days from today, the matter i and decided on its own merits made by the petitioner, it is period, the statue quo as it exists revision within the stipulated \\t0day shall be maintained by the parties. \ [new Counsel for the pmties nor presents a revision along with a Director of Panchayat within 30 ncluding application wiil be heard in accordance With law. On prayer r directed that till the filing of the /, appearing for respondent No. 3 quarely covered by the decision 57 {Smn Ranibai vs. State 0i der passed by the collector is just XI-HC-22 With thcsc obscrvations , ths petition is disposcd of. LA. No. 2873,?2003 starj tertifled copy as per ruJ €S. Jugge [w .ds disposed of. Sdl- Fakhruddin k I WWW €1‘Wm i__‘.__,_/VJh m