IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14536 of 2010 SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, SON OF RAM SEWAK SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA-MULABAGH, P.S. ARRAH NAWADAH, DISTRICT-BHOJPUR (ARRAH). ………………………………………………….PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PATNA. 3. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, PATNA SADAR, PATNA. 4. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND REFORMS, DANAPUR, DISTRICT-PATNA. 5. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, PHULWARISHARIF, DISTRICT-PATNA. 6. RABHUBANSH SINGH, SON OF SHRI RAMDAYAL SINGH. 7. SANJAY SINGH. 8. SHANKAR SINGH. BOTH ARE SONS OF SHRI RABHUBANSH SINGH, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE-SHEKHPURA, P.S. PHULWARISHARIF, DISTRICT-PATNA. ……………………………………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. D.N. Yadav, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Namrata Mishra, GP-IX. For the Respondent : Mr. Sheojee Mishra, Advocate. Nos.6 to 8. ----------- 6 10.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, for the State and for the private-respondent nos.6 to 8. This Writ Petition is a Public Interest Litigation, seeking removal of alleged encroachment from public land. 2 The stand of the State as well as the private- respondents is that the land belongs to one Prayag Mahato and this has been verified after measurement by the Amin. In the aforesaid factual situation, it is not possible to order for removal of alleged encroachment in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. It goes without saying that if the petitioner wants to pursue his grievance further in representative capacity, he may initiate appropriate legal proceeding in accordance with law. P.S./ Sanjay-II (Shiva Kirti Singh, J) ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)