M JET HEGE §Q§ 5? QF .J’i'Jbgté; iJE % iE { 1 ES L IEE‘E’XF f: u of m attisgarh {hrsugh the ancmtaw E‘amhay“? Avam Gramm Vikaw Vibimg {Elm Bhaw'm Rwmy L315? Rznpur (P h} Thr‘ D‘v gecniar; Pancmy'it Amm Chum}; MM Vi [nagw I3Kf> Bh’mzu , mpur Dlw . Raxpsr—(C.G.) 37 Iiiendra Kumm Raihma, $iii} E§gineen Rurai Engineering Services, fanpad ?z§gchayat Lm'mj, Eisiz‘ici, Béiawm‘ (Q46; m 9“ M‘fQN m; hm? AWE“ m m 1%?ggemwmkgn I“ 2%3 x/ E‘M§$%e}w : C L Dxhne S‘aH D T‘ahue I wedwoui 2b veaw nub Fuwme: Ruiai Engnmeung §e>rnces Jaiipad anvhaw: P'mdaxawa Pufncfiéa V'amha (I C” H€ard. The challenge in this vs 16/04/2003 (Annexure Pf 1) working as Sub Engineer, Rt Panchayat Pandariya, Dist. K Baloda, Dist. Janjgir Champa in the same capacity. It is also submitted that ihe petitioner also submitted that though representation (annexuie P/ 3) not yet been decided by the respondent. ‘Being aggxieved groached this Court for relief. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and‘ material on record, in the opinion of this Court, ends of justice will serve if a direction detailed representation along \\eompetent authority Within hfteen days from today and on such \ . rrit ptatition is to the order dated whereby the petitioner, who was n‘al Engineering Services, Janpad awardha, has been transfen‘ed to has bee transfeITed illegally. It is the petitioner has submitted his dated 26/04] 2003, the same has \\ is given to the petitioner to make a with a copy of this order to the x \ [113% W \ \, therewith the petitioner has ap XI-HC-22 \{Q 3m ,‘mgwwqgy/ W mg E g 311w air WW- mix TfagR , W sires WI manW % Wm? V 02i05£2003 A Shri P. Diwakar counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ranbir Singh, GA for the State. Kcj Ll XI-HC»22 we W, Wm:W m crizama W 290 ma \ 871%?! E» W W51 W? am WWT?WW $ WW ‘ \ ’ ‘ representatiou being iiled tha competent authority shall decide the same by passing a masoneml order in accordance with law Within two months from the date of production of representation. If any adverse order is passed and the petitioner thereby feels aggrieved, he may file the petition afresh challenging the said. order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the meiits of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been relieved and he is still continuing. If that be so, he shall not be relieved till consideration] decision of the representation. With the aforesaid observations, this petition stands ‘JL disposed of. // i" Consequently, M.W.P. 1297/2003 and I.A.No. 3928/2003 for urgent hearing also stand disposed of. Certified copy as per rules