IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH Civil Rev. 2048 of 2009 Date of decision: 2.9.2009 Harvinder Singh and another Petitioner vs Veer Singh Respondent Present Mr. JP Sharma, Advocate Mr. JC Nagpal, Advocate M.M.S.BEDI,J. Respondent Veer Singh had obtained a decree for possession after his suit for specific performance stood decreed. Sale deed has already been executed by the Local Commissioner in favour of decree- holder- respondent regarding 10 bighas 5 biswas of land in dispute. The respondent had also applied for issuance of warrant of possession. Vide order dated 10.3.2009 warrants of possession were issued for 21.4.2009. learned counsel for the respondent has placed on record a copy of the report of the Patwari and Field Kanungo indicating that the possession has been delivered to the decree holder. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the operation of the impugned order had been stayed on 18.4.2009 by this court. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the proceedings dated 16.4.2009, it is apparent that the petitioner had already been dispossessed before the stay order was passed in his favour on 18.4.2009. In view of the above, no ground for interference is made out. Dismissed. September 2 ,2009 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE