Crl.M.No.M 8466 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M 8466 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 22, 2010 Balwinder Kaur @ Binder Rani and another .....Petitioners v. State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Parties in person with Mr.P.S.Jammu, Advocate. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondent nos.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent nos.4 and 5. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Superintendent of Police, Sirsa, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 18.3.2010, Annexure P5, already made to him by the petitioners. As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners are major. Age of petitioner no.1-Balwinder Kaur @ Binder Rani, as per copy of Ration card, Annexure P1, is 21 years, and age of petitioner No.2-Raj Kumar, as per copy of Identity Card, issued by Election Commission of India, Annexure P2, is 20 years as on 1.1.2002. They got married on 17.3.2010, as per marriage certificate, Annexure P4. Photographs of the marriage are Annexure P3. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, Crl.M.No.M 8466 of 2010 (O&M) -2- i.e., Superintendent of Police, Sirsa, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 18.3.2010, Annexure P5, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioners. 22.3.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge