Review Application No. 98 of 2010 in -1- CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10985 OF 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION : September 24, 2010. Parties Name Subhash Chand and another ...PETITIONERS VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Yogrdh Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioners-applicants. Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana; Mr. Baljinder Singh Virk, Advocate, for respondent No. 5- Gram Panchayat. JASBIR SINGH, J. ORDER: This application has been filed to review order dated November 16, 2009, ordering dismissal of Civil Writ Petition No. 10985of 2009 in terms of the order passed in C.W.P. No. 9180 of 2009, on that very day. When notice was issued in this application, following contention of counsel for the applicants was noted by this Court: “ Counsel for the petitioners states that instead of CWP No. 9180 of 2009, petitioners' prayer was covered by order Review Application No. 98 of 2010 in -2- CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10985 OF 2009 passed in CWP No. 3723 of 2009. He further states that both the petitions were disposed of on the same date and due to some typographical error, the petition filed by the petitioners was ordered to be disposed of in terms of CWP No. 9180 of 2009.” Perusal of the paper book indicates that the petitioner has not laid challenge to the policy dated February 1, 2008, which was upheld by the judgment passed in CWP No. 9180 of 2009. Rather he was claiming benefit under above said policy. Those writ petitions, in which petitioners were claiming benefit under the policy, were disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners therein to approach the Deputy Commissioner concerned to get the requisite relief. Order, passed in C.W.P. No. 3723 of 2009 on November 16, 2009, reads thus: “ In view of order passed today in Civil Writ Petition No. 9180 of 2009 upholding the validity of order dated February 1, 2008, (P-1), re: allotment of 100- 100 Sq. yards of plots to members of the Scheduled Caste, Backward Class (A) and weaker section of the society, the petitioners may approach the Deputy Commissioner concerned for redressal of their grievance re: allotment of 100- 100 sq. Yards of plots to them. The Deputy Commissioner, Gurgaon, is directed to look into their grievance and if they are eligible as per parameters set down under the Scheme, requisite relief be granted to them. Disposed of.” State counsel has fairly admitted that the case of the petitioners Review Application No. 98 of 2010 in -3- CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10985 OF 2009 is covered by ratio of the judgment in CWP No. 3723 of 2009. Counsel for the Gram Panchayat has put in appearance, he states that the petitioners – applicants were eligible under the policy and the Gram Panchayat shall make an effort to satisfy their claim. In view of facts, mentioned above, this application is allowed and order dated November 16, 2009, is modified and it is ordered that the petitioners in C.W.P. No. 10985 of 2009 shall approach the Deputy Commissioner concerned to claim benefit under the policy mentioned above. ( Jasbir Singh ) Judge September 24 , 2010. DKC