^^i;'.'^. '"e3. <s^ ^«?^- IN THE HIGHeOUKrOfLCHHATTISSQARHATBILA^'UR . W. P. (SINo. c^. '&'^ /2007(S.B.1 PETITIONER: ^s^y' '^^hupdeo Prasad Izardar ro §hriHariram Izardar '^~~^~~~"~~ ~^~~" Aged about 46-< yeaTs, Asst. <^"^ ~ . Teacher, R/o ViUage 8s Post- Sariya, Tah.-Sarangarh, Dist : Raigarh-(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^, w^ State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Raigarh, Dist: Ratgarh-(C.G.) Block Education OfKcer Block —Raigarh District - Raigarh(C.G.) f fi<>M ^ WRIT PKnTION VNDERARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTTFU'nONOFINDlA m'^^s^ /•• 1 HI6H COURT OF CHHATHS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S) No. 905 of 2(M7 Petitioner Smt. Ishwnri Bhoi Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others 4nd Petitioner W. P.(S\ No. 906 of 2007 Bhupdeo Prasad Izarchr Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present: Mr. Vineet Kumar Pandey, counse) for •1+ie petitiorars. AAr. Ajay Dwivedi, Panel tawyer for the State/re^iondents. < OR DER (Passed on this 15th Day of Ftebruary, 2007) 1. The petitioners were appointed vide orders ddted 27.1.89 and 31.3.89 (Annexure P/l), respectively os Assistant Teachers on fixed poy scate of Rs. 300/-. After completion of one year probation, •they vae.re gron+ed regular poy scale. 2. Learned counsel appearing for -the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the case. \s asto whetiier the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w«.f. the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. 3. The issue invotved, herem was considered by •the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (AAadhukant Yadu cnd 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others). wherein "l'€ it was held that the simitarly situated teachers are entitled to regular poy scate w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matt'er was taken-up to the Hon'ble 5upreme Court m Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regutar pay scale from date of initiat oppointment. 4. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners further submits! that this Court', while considerin9 the same issue in Sushil Tiwari & others Vs. State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarfi A others (W.P. (5) No. 5976 of 2006} by order dated 7-1-1-200.6, has granted regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of initia! appointment. 5. Leamed counset oppearing for the parties jointly submit that this cnses are squarety covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Sushil Tiwari & others Vs. State 6ovt. of Chhatt'isgarh A others (Supro). 6. In view of that, these writ petitions are allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. 7. A copy of this order be placed on record in connected writ petition. Bablu Sd/- SarishK.Agnihotn Judge