HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR D.B.: HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE SUNIL KUIVIAR SINHA^ HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE T.P. SHARIVIA WRIT APPEAL N0.176/2011 APPELLANTS RESPONDENTS 1 Pravir Kumar Shah, aged about 45 years, S/o Late Ravindra Kumar Sh9h R/o Darogapara District Raigarh through power of Attorney Holder Om Prakash Patle, aged about 44 years, S/o Chindu Patle, R/o Darogapara, District Raigarh 2 M/s. Nishant Traders Proprietorship Firm Having its registered office at Sindhi Colony Road, Kharsia District Raigarh, through its Proprietor Shri Rajendra Kumar Mirani, aged about 58 years, S/o Shri Chandu Lal - MJrani, R/o Sindhi Colony Road, Kharsia District Raigarh Versus 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary Commercial Tax Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2 Chhattisgarh State MJnor Forest Produce (T & D) through its Managing Director, Cooperative Federation Ltd. A-25, VIP Club Khamrdih, Shanker Nagar, Raipur 3 Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Vanijyik Kar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur ^' ^'^. ^'^-^ •I, ^. '^^ '%... '^' WRIT APPEAL N0.176/2011 erfc 4 Managing Director, District Minor Forest Produce Cooperative Union Lts.& Conservator of Forest, Bilaspur WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2(11 OF THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH1 ACT. 2006 Appearance: Mr. Parag Kotecha, Counsel for the appeilants. Mr. M.P.S. Bhatia, Government Advocate for respondents 1 & 3. Mr. A.S. Kachhwaha, Advocate appears on behalfof Mr. Kishore Bhaduri, Counsel for respondents 2 & 4. ORATORDER (27.04.2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Sunil Kumar Sinha. J. Heard on I.A. No.01/2011, an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. On due consideratjon of the submissions made by jearned counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the appeilants have shown sufficient cause for not filing the appeal in time and the delay in filing the appeal deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, I.A. No.01/2011 is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. .Learned counsel for the parties are also heard on admission. This appeal is directed against a common order dated 01.10.2010 passed in a batch of writ petitions. Against the said common order, many writ appeals, including W.A. No.452/2010, were filed. It is stated at bar that all the writ appeals filed against the common order have been dismissed by a DJvision Bench of this Court by a common judgment datedl 9th ofApril 2011. ^ '^Mii?^ 1 1 <^ysi'^ i / / .-^" WRIT APPEAL N0.176/2011 1°? Learned counsel for the appellants submits that this appeal may also be dismissed/disposed of in terms of the above common judgment dated 19 of April 2011 passed jn W.A. No.452/2010 and other connected writ appeals. In view of the above, the present Writ Appeal Js dismissed in terms ofthe common judgment dated 19th ofApril 2011 passed in the above batch of writ appeals. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge