CRL.M.NO.13258-M of 2010 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRL.M.NO.13258-M of 2010 DATE OF ORDER: 16.8.2010 Ritu and another .....Petitioners vs. State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Yashpal Malik, DAG, Haryana for respondent Nos.1 to 5. Mr. Sanjiv Kadyan, Advocate for respondent Nos.6 to 9. JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL) Petitioners in the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C have prayed for issuance of directions to respondent Nos.2 to 5 not to harass or interfere in their peaceful married life at the instance of respondent Nos.6 to 9. Petitioners claim themselves to be major and solemnized their marriage on 4.5.2010 against the wishes of family members of petitioner No.1-wife. After their marriage, they are residing at Village Loin, Narwana, District Jind whereas respondent Nos. 6 to 9 are residents of Village Rohnat Tehsil Buwani Khera, District Bhiwani. Upon notice, separate replies on behalf of respondent Nos.1,3 and 4 and respondent Nos.1,2 & 5 were filed. In the reply filed by DSP, CRL.M.NO.13258-M of 2010 #2# City Bhiwani on behalf of respondent Nos.1,3 & 4, it has been stated that after investigation, it was found that petitioner No.1-Ritu Devi is of 17 years and 4 months as her date of birth recorded in her Secondary Examination Certificate is 8.1.1993. Accordingly, FIR No.18 dated 17.5.2010 under Sections 363/366/120-B IPC, Police Station Buwani Khera has been lodged on the statement of Vinod, brother of petitioner No.1-wife. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that an another petition bearing Crl.M.No.851-M of 2010 has been filed by petitioner No.1- husband Surender and others praying for quashing of FIR No.90 dated 7.5.2010 under Sections 363/366/120-B IPC, P.S. Buwani Khera wherein proceedings have been stayed by this Court while issuing notice of motion for 20.8.2010. In view of the fact that Surender Singh, DSP, Narwana, District Jind has stated in his written statement that the life and liberty of the petitioners would be protected as per law and that petitioner No.2 along with his family members have already taken recourse to filing of a petition whereby FIR No.90 dated 7.5.2010 lodged by the parents of petitioner No.1-wife, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press this petition any further. Dismissed as not pressed. August 16, 2010 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE