1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.26 OF 2010 Dattu Bala Garud (Pavekari) ...Petitioner Versus The Special Land Acquisition Officer No.12 & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Machindra Deshmukh for Petitioner. Mr.V.S.Gokhale, A.G.P. for Respondents 1 to 3. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATED:- APRIL 12, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. Having regard to the fact situation of the present case, we are not inclined to exercise our writ jurisdiction. It is not in dispute that the acquisition process has been completed long back. Even award has been passed and possession of the disputed property has been taken over by the Authorities. In such a situation, the challenge to the acquisition process after all these steps have been taken, cannot be countenanced. Hence, dismissed. (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)