1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.100 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3744 OF 2008 Sameer Krishnadhan Karr, R/o-Vishnu Industrial Estate, Varangaon Road, 15 Block, Bhusawal, Tq-Bhusawal, Dist-Jalgaon. ...APPELLANT. VERSUS 1) Manoj s/o Bansilal Biyani, R/o-Professor Colony, Bhusawal, Tq-Bhusawal, Dist-Jalgaon. (L.P.A. is dismissed as against Respondent No.1 as per Court's order dated 1st July, 2010), 2) The Collector, Jalgaon, Tq. & Dist-Jalgaon. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri. P.S. Dighe Advocate for Appellant. Shri.S.D. Kaldate, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 27TH SEPTEMBER, 2010. 2 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Appellant. 2. Shri. Dighe, learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the view adopted by the learned Single Judge while disposing of the Writ Petition No.3744 of 2008 is erroneous. The counsel submits that as mandatory provisions were not followed by the objection petitioners seeking disqualification of the Appellant, the Collector had rightly rejected the petition upholding the objections raised by the Appellant. 3. We have perused the order passed by the learned Single Judge and the order passed by the Collector, Jalgaon. We have perused the Reported Judgment relied by the learned Single Judge in the case of Mahachandra Prasad Singh vs. Chairman, Bihar Legislative Council and otehrs, (2004) 8 Supreme Court Cases, Page 747. In the light of the facts of the case and the Reported Judgment in the 3 case of Mahachandra Prasad Singh, cited supra, referred to by the learned Single Judge, we do not notice any infirmity or perversity in the view adopted by the learned Single Judge. The Appellant has not made out any case for consideration of this Letters Patent Appeal. There is no merit in the Appeal, it is accordingly dismissed. [K.K. TATED, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/SEPT10/lpa100.09