1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. LPA No.199/2007 Municipal Council, Pawani Vs. Diwakar s/o Abaji Harde and another. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE AND R. V. MORE, JJ. DATED : 10TH AUGUST, 2007 Heard Mr. Dhatrak, learned counsel for the appellant. The appellant takes exception to the order by which the learned Single Judge allowed Misc. Civil Application No.1240/2006 and set aside order dated 27.4.2004. passed by learned Single Judge of this Court. Respondent no.1 challenged assessment of tax and filed an appeal against the present appellant which was delayed by 18 days. Learned Judicial Magistrate First Class dismissed the appeal on the ground of limitation and the order was maintained by the Revisional Court, learned Single Judge of this Court by order dated 27.4.2004 dismissed Writ Petition No.987/2004 filed by the appellant. By the impugned order dated 25thJune 2007 passed by 2 learned Single Judge granted review of the order dated 27.4.2004 on the ground that there was mistake on the part of the Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant in not filing the application for condonation of delay and, therefore, the petitioner should not suffer. Mr. Dhatrak, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that learned Single Judge has not properly exercised jurisdiction in allowing review application. However, Mr. Dhatrak fairly submitted that respondent has already paid taxes of Rs. 1478/- . In this view of the matter, we are not inclined to interfere in LPA against the impugned order. By the impugned order, substantial justice has been done. Therefore, we are not not inclined to exercise the appellate jurisdiction against the impugned order. For the reasons aforesaid, LPA is hereby rejected. JUDGE JUDGE MLA.