!CftQ HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH. BILA8PUR W.P.tSt Mo. 6180 of 2007 PETITIONER Smfc Kamal Jeet Kaur Bhatiya Age about 41 yeara, Astt. Teacher W/o Sr. Jasmit Singh Bhatiya Govt. Primary School Budhawan Para Don^argarh, Block- Dongarsaph, Distt.- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus RBSPOITOENTS l. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through ; The Secretaiy Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt.-Raipur (C.G.) 2. Dratdct Educatfoa Officer Dtetfc Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PBTITION UKDBR AR'nCLE 236 OF THE COirenTOION OFIBDIA Appearance: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, coiiasel for fhe petitioner. Shri Satish Gupte, Dy. Govt. Advocate for fhe Statc on advaucecopy. ORALORDER (09.10.2007) SUML KUMAR SIMHA. J. Heard on arilinission. Leamed counsel for the petitioner siihnnts that the petitioner has passed B.Ed. cxanunafion on her own expenses, fherefore, she is entitied to receivc two advance increiaents according to circulars dated 24.13.1998 and 01.03i.l999. He also subnuts that ia many identfcal niattera, fhe petitions liave heen allowed in tenns of tlic oider passed in fhe case of TttSluiMWt Kwmar ShcraSwt^ Vs. Wunic^pat Coipurcrtion, Durg cund aiwther {3006 {Z^ JHPJR-CC 96}. He submits fhat ber casc is squarefy covered by fhc said Judgment Tbis legal position is not disputed by thc Teamed counsel for thc Statc. However, he siibimts fhat the oider inay be passert io tenns of fhe said judgment, but it sftaU be sntojected to verification regarding petitioner's such qualtGcation. Accoiduigly, tlie writ petition is allowed in terms of fhe oxder passed in case of YashiiMnt Kumar BharajCbacg Vs. Whmidpal CorpoTccKiwi, Durg and another (Supra) subjcct to fhe verification of the facts as to whether the petitioner bad acqiurcd B.Ed. Examination Cerdffcate on her own expenses as per circiilars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and furthcr whefher she has been paid two advance incremcnts or not The petition stands finally disposed of. No onler as to oosts. Sd/- i Sunil KumarSinha