THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI W.P.No.33741 OF 2010 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R. Radha Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent and with the consent of both the counsel, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. The petitioner claiming to be the owner and possessor of house bearing door Nos.18-5-15 to 32 situated at Lal Darwaza, Hyderabad has filed this writ petition apprehending threat of demolition of the said premises by the respondent-Corporation. The petitioner pleads and asserts that she is the owner of the premises bearing door Nos.18-5-15 to 32, Lal Darwaza, Hyderabad by virtue of registered sale deed dated 28.06.1971 executed by one Mohiuddin and another. It appears, the said premises has been assessed to tax, which the petitioner says that she has been paying. It appears that the respondent served notice on her in Lr.No. 35/ACP/C4/GHMC/2010 dated 24.11.2010 under section 636 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’) directing to pull down or remove unauthorised construction of ground floor in premises No.18-5-35. The petitioner states that she has nothing to do with the said premises bearing No. 18-5-35, but in the guise of service of notice dated 24.11.2010, the respondent is proceeding to demolish the premises bearing door Nos.18-5-15 to 32. The petitioner, therefore, has approached this Court to declare the action threatening to demolish the said premises of which she is the owner as illegal. A perusal of the notice issued by the respondent dated 24.11.2010 would show that action has been initiated under Section 452 of the Act with reference to the premises bearing door No. 18-5-35, but not the premises bearing door Nos.18-5-15 to 32. If that be so, the respondent cannot legitimately proceed in respect of the premises Nos. 18-5-15 to 32. There is also no indication from the said notice that there are any unauthorised constructions in the said premises. It must be therefore, be held that the respondent cannot either demolish or remove the premises bearing door Nos.18-5-15 to 32. If there are any illegal constructions in the premises No.18-5-35, the respondent is at liberty to proceed against the same in accordance with law. The writ petition is allowed subject to the above observation. NOUSHAD ALI,J Dt. 31.12.2010 Note: cc in two days b.o. lvl THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI W.P.No.33741 OF 2010 Dt. 31.12.2010