IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48081 of 2008 Mantu Sah, son of Deo Narayan Sah, resident of Village-Barhari, P.S. Barhara, District-Purnea…………………………Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Anita Devi, wife of Mantu Sah, D/o. Parmeshwar Sah, resident of Mohballa, P.S. Rupauli, District-Purnea……..Opposite Parties. ----------- 3. 26. 03. 09. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No. 101 of 2008 for offence under Sections 498 A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in this case for ulterior purposes. He is already a married man as it would be evident from marriage certificate contained in Annexure-2 series. It is further submitted that on perusal of the F.I.R. it would appear that date of marriage of the petitioner is claimed to be 8. 6. 08 whereas other petitions given to the police official the date of marriage was different. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that father of the petitioner has also filed a complaint case against the father of Anita Devi (informant) alleging that the son i.e. petitioner was abducting by the informant. Learned counsel for Opposite Party No. 2, submits that the complainant desirous to live with the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is - 2 - directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today the petitioner namely, Mantu Sah shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, in Barhara P.S. Case No. 101 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Sub Section 2 of Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)