IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 100 OF 2011 MR. LAWRENCE DIAS ... Petitioner Versus STATE THROUGH THE P.P ... Respondent Mr. Arun Bras De Sa, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. C. A. Ferreira, Public Prosecutor for the State-Respondent. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 5th October, 2011 P.C. Heard Shri Arun Bras De Sa, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Shri C. A. Ferreira, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State-Respondent. 2. After hearing the learned Counsel and on perusal of the impugned Order, I find that there is no jurisdictional error committed by the learned Sessions Judge whilst passing the impugned Order which calls for any interference of this Court at this stage. The only apprehension of Shri Arun Bras De Sa, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner is that any statement made by the witness in the cross examination may not be considered by the learned Sessions Judge at the stage of the final disposal of the criminal complaint. This apprehension cannot be accepted as it is well settled that the whole evidence of the witness which includes the examination in chief, cross examination and re-examination, if any, has to be read as a whole while appreciating the whole evidence on record while disposing of the Criminal complaint at the final stage. 3. For the aforesaid reasons, the Petition stands dismissed. F. M. REIS, J. arp/*