1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. COMPANY PETITION NO.768 OF 2006 Ravindra Poonamchandra Angara ..Petitioner. Vs. Hindustan Dorr-Oliver Ltd. ..Respondent. ... None for the Petitioner. Mr. Girish Pednekar i/b M/s. PDS Legal for the Respondent. .... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 25th April, 2007. P.C. : On 23rd March, 2007 when Counsel appearing for the Petitioner was absent, the Court passed the following order : “Counsel appearing for the Petitioner is absent. Counsel appearing for the Respondent states that parties are in the process of reconciling the account and seeks an adjournment in order to enable the parties to explore a settlement. To be placed on 18th April, 2007. Should parties not be able to settle the matter, affidavit in reply shall be filed on or before 13th April, 2007. No further adjournment will be granted.” On 8th April, 2007 an adjournment was granted since the Court was 2 informed that a memorandum of understanding was arrived at between the parties and the Petition was directed to stand over to 25th April, 2007. Counsel appearing for the Respondent has placed on the record a Memorandum of Understanding that was arrived at between the parties. Counsel appearing for the Petitioner is absent. The Petition is disposed of with liberty reserved to the Petitioner to move the Court for the revival of these proceedings or by fresh proceedings in the event that there is any further default on the part of the Respondent. The Company Petition is disposed of.