F^' T I-HC-22 '3^ "41<41cii2i, Sfll'M'16, faffKiy SW^ l^^K '1 lilHWI 9>W* "^ 200 fq^ff' sii^i ?n h-i'w s^v ?ti*llct) ^ft^T SIN&E BENCH: HON'BLE JUSTICE &HIREN&RA MISHRA "s CT^T ^Riiwtrit? (Petition UM 226 of th^ Constitution of India) PCTmONi N.K. Sha'ma, sf 42 yeors, Bi^ek Shikhsa Misiti [Chhatti^srh.21 Vs RESPONbBslTi 1. State of Secretsry', Z. The Director, B cht'4^<i1i +ii^ci?^ ^^\ ^<^i< ^?3rf?gqaii^r 'o Late C.L. Sharma, oged about Coordinator, Riy'iv ©andhi iion, Pali, District Korba Chhattisgarh through the School Education Depcs'troent, D.K.S. Bhaw|in. Ralpur (C.6.) iector-cum-District Mission Sotjiv 6andhi Shikhsa Mission, 18,06.2008 Korbu, t>istifict Korba, Chhattisgarh. 3. The Contnissioner, Tribai weifare Departraen^, Raipur, (Chhattisgeffh). 4. bistrict Pr4Ject Co-ordinator, R<yiv eandhi Shikhsfli Mlssion, htorba, District Korba, Chhattisgar|i. 5. Bbek Edui|:i3tion Officer, Psli, &.!strist Korba, Chh^ttisgarh. 6. Shri O.P. Si(orma,s/o Shrl B.P, Shukla, <gsd about 50 )|ears, U.b.T. Higher Secondary Schoo!, ^eharchuwan, Block to-tula, bistrict Koi(ba [Chhattis9<»*h.]. Mr. AM. Prasad, Advocate for fie petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Agarwai, Pcnel La|uyer for •rtie State. Miss Dsepali Pandey, Advocate Heard. for respondent No.6. ig^ XIjhC-22 ^ h-u* sv^v Stlli'sll ^ft?f :T TST -i|l'llld'l<, »Ti)+l'l(»,l°<01+iy,< HWW WWW •fg^w 311^1 ^WIWdft^ F)- ^-> 'ioiler By this petition the petitior^er Annexure P-1 dated 28.7.i whereby •Hie services of 1+ie department and he was posted at Barpali. However, by virtue of order has not been aiven effect tj as Coordinator, Rajiv 5andhi Shiksita Learned counse! for the psr^ if the petition is disposed of by order whereby 1+ie petitioner ha( Secondary School, Barpaii after pejtitioner stc(y subntission In view of 1+ie above petition is disposed of wi-t+i a direjction be returned to his original competent authority of the origin41 the petitioner at ony place. Conseauentiv, I.A. No.l also Certified copy as per ruies. i*i'i|F<'l'lil-< W^! '? fe^t <fa|*41< ^SI^OTSII^I has impugned the tronsfer order of by the respondent No.2 herein titioner was returned to his original Governmen^ Higher Secondary Schooi, order dated 17.3.2008 the impuqned is Mission, Pali. Mes submit that they have no objection fctt-ing aside that part of •t+ie impugned been posted at Govemment Higher k'eturning his serv'ices to the original ot tiie re^ective parties, this that 1tie petitioner services may and it would be open to 1lie department to utiiize the services of ptands disposed of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge [^iRg^