1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.4162 of 2009 (Rama C. Khadse and others v. Maroti N. Khadse) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Smt. M.M. Shesh, Advocate for Petitioners. Coram : R.C. Chavan, J. Dated : 30 th September, 2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. This petition is directed against the order passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Umarkhed, allowing the respondent’s applications Exhibits 17 and 18 for amendment to the plaint as well as the application for injunction. In the plaint as well as the application for injunction, the plaintiff has described the suit property as field survey no.53 situated at Village Mulawa. It may be seen that the plaintiff as well as defendants No.1 to 3 are residents of Village Mulawa. The field is, however, situated at revenue Village Sukli. Therefore, the plaintiff wanted the words “Village Mulawa” to be replaced by the words 2 “Village Sukli”. The petitioners have in fact filed a counter-claim in respect of the same field at Village Sukli. Therefore, there is no dispute that the field is situated at Village Sukli and field survey No.53 is not at Village Mulawa. The other amendment is in respect of the name of person whose field is situated towards the north. Instead of “Laxman Rohidas Khadse”, the plaintiff wants to show the name of “Chandu Rohidas Khadse” Now the counter-claim also refers to “Chandu Rohidas Khadse” to be on the southern side. In view of this, the learned Trial Judge rightly held that they were only typographical or clerical error in the description of the property, which were required to be corrected. The order passed does not call for interference. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Judge. pdl