1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1790/2009 Vijay Singh Rathore. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date : 16.12.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.SS Rathore, for the petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Bhati, for the respondents. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is not in dispute, as not disputed by the respondents, that the petitioner, when was appointed on the post of Shiksha Sahyogi was of the eligible age of appointment. His appointment on the post of Prabhodak has been denied ignoring this fact and rule and appointment has been denied after taking into account the age which the petitioner was having at the time of advertisement issued for appointment to the post of Prabhodak. It is submitted that this Court has already taken a view in another case that if the person when has been appointed on the post of Shiksha Sahyogi and was not over-aged at that time and if he applied for the post of Prabhodak, his upper age will not be bar and that is the position under the Rules. 2 In view of the above, this writ petition deserves to be allowed, hence, allowed and the respondents are directed to consider the candidature of the petitioner for the post of Prabhodak and if the petitioner is found eligible otherwise, then he be given appointment and shall not be denied appointment on the ground of crossing upper age limit on the date of advertisement. This exercise be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order which may be sent by the petitioner to the concerned authorities. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya