IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.17314 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision.20.09.2011 Pawan Kumar son of Jagan Nath r/o Lajpat Rai Nagar, Gali No.6, Kotkapura .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through Secretary Home, Punjab, Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. P.P.S. Duggal, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the purchaser from the landlord has been creating trouble to his peaceful enjoyment when he has been running a sweet meat shop as a tenant. As I perceived, it is a civil right, which the petitioner claims against the landlord and his successor. He apprehends serious threats at the instance of the purchaser from the landlord with the local police officials. The petitioner states that he has already given a complaint Annexure P-9 to the Superintendent of Police, Faridkot. The 2nd respondent shall enquire and find out whether there is any criminal offence made out and if so, to direct proper investigation and take action as per law within a period of one week from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 2. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 20, 2011 Pankaj*