b§7/z®7//\ ® IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT LPETITION (C) NO. ?ql&rl 2009 PETITIONER : / Mohammad Shahzad Ali S/o. Enayat AH, aged about : 35V years, R/o. Village + Post : Ghatmunda, Tahsil : Kunkuri District : Jashpur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS /1] Appellate AuthOrity & Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue) Kunkuri, District: Jashpur (C.G.). ' /2] Tahsildar & Assistant Registration Officer, Kunkuri, District : Jashpur (C.G.). Vimla Bhagat W/o. Baldev Bhagat, aged about Unknown, R/o. Village + Post Ghatmunda, Tahsil / Kunkuri District : Jashpur (C.G.). /4] The Collector and District Election Officer, Jashpur, District : Jashpur (C.G.). /S] State Eiection Commission, Through : Chief Eiectoral Officer, State of Chhattisgarh, Rai‘pur, District : Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 22 OF THE N N ONSTITUTION OF INDIA . C . SB:HON. $ 17—12-2009 Shri P.K. Patel, Ad . f6rthe petitiona‘. sm Sushii Dubey, Goxét. Advocate, fa: the State. Heard. ‘ ' > . Shri'Sushil Dubey Govt. Adv. 'takés notice 0n b6ha1f of the respondents No. 1, 2 and 4‘ } JUS ICE NJ‘K. AGARWAL' ‘ H The instant petiti is difected against the order dated 10—11—2009 passed by L respondent No. 1. Brief facts of the c se are as under:- Vids order Ann xure 13—3 dated 15—9—2009, the Registration Omcer (P chayat), Kunkuri ordered deletion of the name of the petitio r from the Voter List. There against, the petitioner Went in ppealr before the Appeilate Authority i.e. the respondent No. in terms of provisions contained in sub—Rule 5 or Ruie 2’ of the Chhattisgarh ‘Panchayat Nirvachan Niyam, 19 . The Appellate Authority neither allowed the appeal nor r je‘cted it. Hence this petition. Shri Patel, lear counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Appella Authority ought to have decided the appeal on Inerits. By r ferring the order of the Registration Officer dated 15—92009, he would submit that the order for deletion of petitioner’s ame from the Voter List has already R e e 9 n ,* m m ‘ _ m 200 m EW,W.W @