1 fca99.05 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 99 OF 2005 Milind Pandurang Behere. ....Appellant. Vs. Sau.Manasi Milind & Anr. ....Respondents WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.207 OF 2005 Milind Pandurang Behere. ....Appellant. Vs. Sau.Manasi Milind & ors. ....Respondents None for appellant. Shri Jaydeep S. Deo for Respondents. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED:- AUGUST 9, 2010 P.C. 1. None appears for the Appellant when the matter is called out. 2. Counsel for the Respondent wife had invited our attention to the fact that she has filed application being Civil Application (st.) No.18788 of 2010 praying 2 fca99.05 for striking out the defence of the Appellant husband on the ground that he is persistently in default and he has not paid monthly maintenance amount, which is around Rs.1,76,000/-. In any case, as none appears for the Appellant, dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, nothing survives for consideration in the Criminal Revision Application. The same is also disposed of accordingly. (A.A.SAYED, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)