ITLTHJ; HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.MO^O OF 2011 PETITIONER : -^ v-\..^' .' ^^w ^.-^^ ^•<?1<?-<:"" ...• :\^'"'^ \.--" l>ff i ®!&& iiffl\ k^.'sl ^ ^. -*'"•"» Jagannath Dadsena, S/o Sitali Ram, aged about 50 years, presently posted and working as Peon in the office of Senior Agriculture Development Officer, Bilaigarh, District Raipur (CG). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Agriculture, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 2. Collector.Raipur (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^•-" '^' RESPONDENTS: <^ ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRIT PETmON (S} No. 4080 of2QU Jagannath Dadsena. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PE'rmQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TEffi CONSTTI'UTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J, Present: Shri B.D.Gum, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer farthe State/respondents. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 28th day ofJuly, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for tfae petitioner, on instmctions, seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation to the respondent authorities. 2. Leamed couxisel appearing for ofher side has no objection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is disniissed as withdrawn with the aforestated observation, ifso advised. Sd/- , .,; ^^AgmboW Judge