IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35091 of 2010 1. TETAR RAM, S/O LATE SHEO TAHAL RAM, 2. SUMITRA DEVI, W/O TETAR RAM, 3. POONAM DEVI, W/O PRAVINDRA RAM, 4. PRAVINDRA RAM, S/O JAGDISH RAM, ……….PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 10.11.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application, as during the pendency of this application, petitioner no.1 has been arrested. The prayer is allowed and this application is dismissed as withdrawn as against Petitioner no. 1. For petitioner nos. 2,3 and 4, heard learned counsel for the parties. Grievance of the complainant is that the money which she received after death of her husband from the company where he was working was distributed by petitioner no. 1 in three parts and inheritance of ancestral property was given to her daughter, thereafter 2 there is further allegation about torture, cruelty, ouster and keeping of her ornaments, but that is negatived by statement made in para 19 of complaint that when some talk was there in between the complainant’s parents and accused persons, demand was made for money Rs. 40000/- given by the complainant’s father which was refunded. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner nos. 2,3 and 4 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 1930 of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Bhardwaj ( Mandhata Singh, J.) 3