( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 824 OF 2009 Tushar s/o Surendrakumar Bhatt .. Petitioner VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents ... Mr. Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. V.D. Rakh, APP for the respondent / State Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2 ... CORAM : A.V.NIRGUDE,J. DATED : 19th April, 2010 ORAL ORDER 1. Heard. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, petition is taken up for final hearing. 3. Despite of giving several opportunities to the complainant as well as the Investigation Agency, they are unable to show to the Court that the petitioner is directly or indirectly involved in the alleged offence committed by other two accused. The petitioner admittedly is not residing at Nanded and not managing the affairs of the company’s branch at Nanded. The petitioner is roped in this case only because he is immediate superior officer of the other two accused. The case as against the ( 2 ) petitioner is not convincing, and therefore, the petition deserves to be allowed. The petition is allowed. There shall be order in terms of prayer clause (b). 4. Rule made absolute. [A.V.NIRGUDE,J.] SRM/criwp/824/09