IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15400 of 2010 1. TETARI DEVI, WIFE OF RAMASHANKER SINGH. 2. RAMASHANKER SINGH, SON OF LATE MAHADEO SINGH. BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NAWKA TOLA BHAGWANPUR, P.S.- MIRGANJ, DISTRICT- GOPALGANJ Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 09.06.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are the mother-in-law and father- in-law of the complainant Bimla Devi. They are apprehending their arrest in connection with a complaint case registered for the offences under Sections 498A and 406 of the Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted on their behalf that their son has gone to Middle East and after his departure to foreign country the daughter-in-law went to her parental house and lodged the present case. In this background it is submitted that petitioners have no objection to continue the matrimonial relationship with the complainant and to that effect they shall file a written undertaking on affidavit in the court within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in the court below. No sooner such undertaking on affidavit is filed, petitioners, named above, be admitted to the privilege of provisional bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Gopalganj in connection with Complaint Case No. 95 of 2009 whereafter the complainant should be noticed and when she appears in - 2 - the court below, in presence of the court, petitioners should persuade her to come back to the matrimonial fold not only by words of mouth but also by their suitable conduct and gesture and when the husband of the complainant returns to India efforts shall be made to persuade him to resume the matrimonial ties with the complainant. The court below should monitor the trial and ensure justice to the parties in accordance with law. In the event dispute is resolved or the complainant is back to her matrimonial home or she is found to be unreasonable, provisional bail granted to the petitioners shall be confirmed, failing which court below shall be at liberty to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law considering the reasonableness of the stand of the parties. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioners. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)