IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10336 of 2005 ONKAR PRASAD SINGH . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 3. 25.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, for the State and for the Bihar School Examination Board. The argument that date of birth was changed unilaterally in the service book does not appeal to the Court as even the original entry of the date of birth in the year 1969 initialled by the petitioner is not free from doubt and patently suffers from overwriting and correction. The date of birth of the petitioner, therefore, becomes a serious disputed question of fact, which cannot be inquired into in writ jurisdiction, but only before a competent civil forum based on evidence that may be led in support of and against the claim including oral evidence with regard to the overwritings and corrections in the service book. The writ application stands dismissed. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)