Crl. Misc. No.M-59 of 2011 (O&M) ****** Krishna and another Vs. State of Haryana Present : Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Shalini Attri, D.A.G., Haryana. ******* AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that inadvertently in the head-note and body of the petition the police station has been mentioned as Bahadurgarh instead of GRP Bahadurgarh. Therefore, it should be read as Police Station GRP Bahadurgarh. This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioners in case F.I.R. No.64 dated 24.09.2010 registered under Sections 147, 149, 427, 353, 186 IPC and under Sections 150, 174 of the Indian Railway Act at Police Station GRP Bahadurgarh. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the said F.I.R. was lodged against the mob and not a single person as well as the petitioners have been named specifically in the F.I.R. On the other hand, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana states that petitioners have indulged in large scale of violence, vandals and damaged the public property and charges have also been framed against them. However, keeping in mind the fact that the petitioners have now been in custody since 25.09.2010, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners behind the bars. Crl. Misc. No.M-59 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in my considered opinion, it would be in the interest of justice if the petitioners are released on bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Jhajjar only on furnishing a heavy security so as to protect any future recurrence. Ordered accordingly. The petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) January 28, 2011. JUDGE ashish