IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26642 of 2010 SUJIT KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 13.12.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It is said that by breaking open shutter of informant’s shop, several items like mobile, DVD, Television were taken away. Some of the miscreants apprehended, Navnit Ujjwal is one of them confesses his guilt with further statement that Tata Sumo Victa was used by the members who committed theft. Petitioner’s father is owner of Sumo Victa. It is said that petitioner played the role of driver, but at the same time, it is said by Navnit Ujjwal that vehicle was taken on fare. Vehicle is released in favour of owner of the vehicle. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No.318 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)