IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9263 of 2011 1. Meera Devi, wife of Fulo Sao. 2. Nutan Devi, wife of Manjan Sao, wrongly mention as Ranjan Sao, resident of Village- Paprour, P.S. Brauni, District- Begusarai……………………………………….Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & OTHERS………………………………….Opposite Parties. ----------- 2. 11.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the mother and wife of the elder brother of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323,304B,201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The marriage was performed six years prior to the occurrence and there was demand of motor cycle and T.V. but the thrust of accusation is against the husband. Though there is general accusation against the entire in-laws family including the petitioners. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the victim was living separate from the husband much prior to the occurrence which gets reflected from Annexure-2. Though accusation against the petitioner no.2 is to have illicit relation with the husband even prior to 2 marriage which has been denied by the learned counsel for the petitioners. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No. 26 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Begusarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)