IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 12693 of 2008 Between: 1 Kum. Vemala Neelima Rani.D D/o.Rama Rao Rep.by her father and natural guardian Rama Rao R/o.Seebilli Peddavasala(V) Makkuva(M) Vizianagaram District 2 Kum. Vemala Bharathi D/o.Bhaskara Rao Rep.by her father and natural guardian Bhaskara Rao R/o.Seebilli Peddavasala(V) Makkuva(M) Vizianagaram District 3 Sri Karri Sasi S/o.Krishna Rao Rep.by her father and natural guardian Krishna Rao R/o.Seebilli Peddavasala(V) Makkuva(M) Vizianagaram District ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Technology Rep.by its Vice Chancellor IIIT Campus Gachibowli Hyderabad 2 Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Techonology rep.by its Decan L.V.A.R Sharma O/o.IIIT Decan Lakadikapool, Hyderabad 3 The State of A.P rep.by its Principal Secretary Higher Education Department Secretariat,Hyderabad 4 The State of A.P Rep.by its Principal Secretary Information Technology & Communication Dept Secretariat Hyderabad 5 The Revenue Divisional Officer Pravathipuram Vizianagaram District 6 The State Council for Higher Education Government of Andhra Pradesh Masabtank Hyderabad 7 Marpina Paravathi D/o.Simhachalam, R/o.Santhesawaram(V) Makkuva(M) Near Bobbili Vizianagaram District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ,order or direction declaring the action of the respondents in not including the name of the petitioner in the provisional list/ﬁnal list for admission into RGU IIIT in Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Techonoligies under 85% quota earmarked for rural mandals and also 33% reserved for woman candidates as illegal and arbitrary and it is in conﬂict with the admission procedure and the admission rules which were contemplated for such selection and direct the respondents to admit the petitioners to six years integrated programme in Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Techonologies as per the admmission procedure and the rules framed by the University and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : O R D E R : Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition reserving permission to petitioner Nos.2 and 3 to apply for admission into Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Technology as and when notiﬁcation with regard to CBSE (Reserved) candidates is issued. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed reserving the liberty to petitioner Nos.2 and 3 to apply for admission into Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Technology as and when notification with regard to CBSE (Reserved) candidates is issued. 29th August, 2008. (B.Seshasayana Reddy,J) tnb ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{BMR} THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.12693 OF 2008 29T H AUGUST 2008