IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1792 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO. 1792 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO. 1792 OF 2004 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO. 339 OF 2001 APPEAL NO. 339 OF 2001 APPEAL NO. 339 OF 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 4th February, 2005. : 4th February, 2005. : 4th February, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Shri Rajesh Behere appearing for the Applicants states that prayer (b) is not pressed. He states that the Applicants have been served with the notice of Appeal five years after filing of the Appeal. He states that the Applicant No.1 is a senior citizen and therefore, the hearing of the appeal should be expedited. He submitted that a fixed date of hearing may be given. 2. As the Applicant No.1 is a senior citizen, the Appeal deserves to be expedited. As the Second Appeals from the year 1983 onwards are pending for final hearing, fixed date cannot be given. Civil Application is partly allowed in terms of prayer clause (c). Judge. Judge. Judge.