IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1085 OF 2009 Between: Dadireddy Siva Reddy .....PETITIONER AND Kanchanagari Narayana Reddy (died) by LRs. And others ....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1085 OF 2009 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition, under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (for short, “C.P.C.”) is directed against the order, dated 12.02.2009, in E.P.No.202 of 2006 in Original Suit No.29 of 2003, on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kadiri, whereunder and whereby, the Execution Petition, filed under Order XXI Rules 37 and 38 C.P.C., for realization of decretal amount of Rs.1,24,903/-, was allowed. 2. Heard. 3. On 05.03.2009, this Court, while admitting the revision petition, directed the petitioner to deposit half of the decretal amount to the credit of E.P.No.202 of 2006. In pursuance of the said order, the petitioner/judgment debtor deposited half of the decretal amount and he has to pay the remaining half of the decretal amount together with costs and interest. Complying the interim order of this Court by the petitioner would go to show that the petitioner has means to pay the remaining half of the decretal amount together with costs and interest, but he is wantonly evading to pay the decretal amount. Therefore, the trial Court rightly passed the order of arrest. There are absolutely no grounds to interfere with the impugned order. However, considering the request of the petitioner to grant some time to deposit the remaining decretal amount, some reasonable time can be given to the petitioner so that he can pay the remaining half of the decretal amount. Hence, the impugned order is kept under abeyance for a period of three months from today to enable the petitioner to pay the remaining decretal amount together with costs and interest. If the petitioner/judgment debtor fails to pay the remaining half of the decretal amount, the order of trial Court shall be given effect to without further reference to the Court. 4. With the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C. BHANU, J December 16, 2010 MD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1085 OF 2009 December 16, 2010