IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 299 of 2004 Date of decision: 31st July, 2009 Bharat Singh … Petitioner Versus Jagdev Singh and another … Respondents CORAM: HOB’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) On July 17, 2009, this Court had passed the following order: “Present revision petition has been filed against the order of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rohtak, whereby he ordered that the plaintiff should pay ad-valorem Court fee. This order was assailed. The Court had ordered that suit shall not be dismissed for non-payment of ad-valorem Court fee. Counsel for the petitioner is unable to state the outcome of the suit. Registry is directed to obtain a status report from the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rohtak regarding pendency of the suit. List on 24th July, 2009.” In compliance with the said order, the trial Court has submitted a report and has stated that the plaintiff had withdrawn the suit and on 2nd March, 2007, Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Rohtak had passed the following order: Civil Revision No.299 of 2004 “Plaintiff has made the statement that the matter has been compromised and he does not want to proceed with this case. In view of the statement, the suit of the plaintiff is dismissed as withdrawn. File be consigned to the record room.” Counsel for the petitioner submits that since the suit was withdrawn on the basis of compromise, the suit has not been adjudicated and no decree has been issued, therefore, present petition has been rendered infructuous. As prayed, dismissed, having become infructuous. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE July 31, 2009 rps 2