IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27029 of 2010 1. DHARM LAL YADAV @ DHARAM LAL YADAV, S/O LATE CHICHAI YADAV, 2. DASRATH YADAV @ DASHRATH YADAV, S/O LATE CHICHAI YADAV, 3. MADAN YADAV, S/O DHARAM LAL YADAV, ALL R/O VILLAGE BALUAHA, P.S. SONBARSA, KACHAHARY, DISTRICT-SAHARSA. --PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, 2. MANITA DEVI, W/O LATE RAM KUMAR YADAV, R/O VILLAGE-BALUAHA, P.S. SONBARSA KACHAHARY, DISTRICT-SAHARSA, PRESENTLY MORAKHI, P.S. BAKHTIYARPUR O.P. BALWAHAAT, DISTRICT- SAHARSA. --OPP.PARTY 2 23.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The three petitioners are named accused in the complaint case, being two brothers of deceased husband of the complainant and son of one of the brothers, i.e., petitioner no.1, carry allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. of the widow, complainant who is blessed with one female child before her husband left for heavenly abode. The dispute further appears relating to share in the family property. It is submitted, during course of argument, that nothing as regard 2 to share of the complainant and her daughter in the family property is denied and further to secure and develop her confidence the petitioners undertake to get an Savings Bank Account open in nearest nationalized bank in the name of complainant and her minor daughter and deposit Rs.10,000/- without having any claim over said deposit. Taking into consideration the gesture as shown on behalf of the petitioners on opening of the account and deposit of the amount, the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in Complaint Case no. 787 C of 2007, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with additional condition that petitioners no.1 and 2 shall remain present before the court below on each and every date for one year or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioners no.1 and 2 fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed 3 to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad