IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2011 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32127 of 2011(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S) : ----------------------- C.J.RAPHEL, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.C.L.JOSEPH, PROPRIETOR, CHEMMANNUR JOSEPH & SONS, GENERAL MERCHANTS AND COMMISSION AGENTS, OLARIKKARA, THRISSUR. BY ADVS. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S) : -------------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAVELI BHAVAN, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 020. 2. MANAGER (PURCHASE), THE KERALA STATE CIVIL SLUPPLIES CORPORATION, MAVELI BHAVAN, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 020. 3. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), TALUK OFFICE, THRISSUR, PIN - 680 020. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SMT.MOLLY JACOB,SC, FOR SUPPLYCO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.S JAMAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AMV WPC NO.32127 OF 2011 (M) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS : P.1 : COPY OF THE GOODS ISSUE SHEET ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT DEPOT THRISSUR OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD: 06.01.2010. P.2 : COPY OF THE LETTER DTD: 08.12.2009 OF THE 1ST RESPONENT CORPORATION. P.3 : COPY OF THE LETTER DTD: 09.12.2009 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT CORPORATION. P.4 : COPY OF ONE OF THE BILL EVIDENCING SALE OF WHEAT DTD: 15.01.2010. P.5 : COPY OF THE LETTER DTD: 27.11.2010 OF 1ST RESPONDENT. P.6 : COPY OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P.7 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD: 29.11.2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE AMV S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 32127 of 2011 ================== Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner purchased wheat from the Civil Supplies Corporation. The petitioner paid full price of the wheat so purchased. The petitioner has now been asked to pay differential costs of wheat, which, according to the petitioner, he is not liable to pay. The petitioner has filed Ext.P7 representation in this regard before the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on the same expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents also. 3. I am of opinion it is only appropriate that the 1st respondent considers Ext.P7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P7, as expeditiously as possible, within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Till orders are passed on Ext.P7, coercive recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge - : 2 :-