THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 15019 of 2010 O R D E R: It is the case of the petitioner that he filed complaints dated 28.5.2010, 25.6.2010 and 26.6.2010 before 2nd and 3rd respondents but no action has been taken by the respondents. It appears, petitioner filed suit in O.S. No. 132 of 1995 for specific performance of agreement of sale alleged to have been executed by one K. Kondadu and the same was decreed on 12.2.2001. Aggrieved by the same, it appears, the said Kondadu filed A.S. No. 986 of 2001. 4th respondent and others impleaded in A.S. No. 986 of 2001 and the said appeal is pending. While that being so, even respondent No.4 filed O.S. No. 357 of 2004 claiming title to the property and he obtained injunction against the petitioner. However, the same is the subject matter of C.M.A. before this Court in C.M.A. No. 772 of 2006. According to both the learned counsel, arguments were heard in C.M.A. as well as A.S. and orders were reserved. According to the petitioner, in the meanwhile respondent No.4 is bent upon committing mischief by entering into the land and raising structures. Further, it is also brought to the notice of the Court that the R.D.O., invoking Section 145 of Cr.P.C., directed both the parties to maintain status quo in M.C. No. 78 of 2010 and the same is still pending. In spite of this, according to the petitioner, respondent No.4 is trying to enter the land and raise structures. Under those circumstances, without expressing any opinion merits, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Narsipatnam is directed to see that both the parties do not enter the land in dispute until the case is disposed of by him and, if necessary, the R.D.O. shall take the help of police for maintaining status quo orders granted by him. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU. Date: 5-10-2010. MVB.