IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.10240 of 2011 Date of Decision : August 10, 2011. Jasvir Singh .....Petitioner versus The Financial Commissioner, Revenue, Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Randhir Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the orders passed by the Revenue Authorities including dated 25.8.2009 (Annexure P-20) passed by the Financial Commissioner (Revenue), Punjab, whereby the partition proceedings initiated by him have been adjourned sine-die to await the decision of the Civil Court in a civil suit filed by the respondents claiming their exclusive ownership on the land in dispute and in which the Civil Court has directed the parties to maintain status-quo vide an order dated 8.12.2005. No exception can be taken to the view formed by the Revenue Authorities. The impugned orders, thus, called for no interference by this CWP No.10240 of 2011 [2] Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, rightly contends that the private respondents have filed the civil suit in the year 2005 and it is still pending even after expiry of six years. In these circumstances, it appears desirable to direct the Civil Court, Ludhiana to expedite and dispose of the suit in a time bound manner, preferably within a period of one year from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 10, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE