IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 8TH AUGUST 2008 / 17TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 22191 of 2008(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SIMI SARA MATHEW, SRAMBIKKAL PALLATHATTAYIL, MULANTHURUTHY. BY ADV. SRI.P.P.JACOB RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANADU. 2. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, (L.A), NATIONAL HIGHWAY, NO.III, VYTTILA. 3. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, P.W.D. DEPARTMENT, SECRETARAIT, TRIVANDRUM. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THIRUVANIYOOR VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM. BY G.P. SRI.BASANTH BALAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(c).No. 22191 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of August, 2008 JUDGMENT As directed, the Government Pleader has filed a statement. Along with the statement, he has produced Annexures A, B and C, which are copies of the relevant pages of Section 4(b) notices pertaining to the notification under section 4(1). All these are dated 31.8.2005 and respectively contain endorsements of the Deputy Tahsildar, the Village Officer and six members of the local public. These endorsements will show that the claim of the Government that declaration under section 6 has been made within one year of the date of the last publication of the notification under sect ion 4 (1) is correct. Under the above circumstances, it is not possible to grant the reliefs sought for in the writ petition, which essentially are for a declaration that Exts.P1 and P2 are time barred and for a direction to the respondents to issue fresh notification on the basis that Exts.P1 and P2 have become time barred. The writ petition will stand dismissed. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE dpk .