IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32216 of 2008 Kamal Paswan Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- 3 11.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of cognizance dated 07.07.2008/08.07.2008 passed in Minapur P.S. Case No. 87 of 2005. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is Panchayat Sevak ,he was allotted work. It is submitted that the investigation discloses that the labourars had made complaint due to lesser wages and due to that the case is made out under Sections 406, 409, 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code against this petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner may be examined at the time of framing of charges at this stage the Court cannot assess the relevance of the material. In the circumstances, this application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to raise the points at the appropriate stage in the trial. Prakash ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)