IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH JUNE 2011 / 18TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 14958 of 2011(T) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- T.A.MOUNAGURUSWAMY, S/O.LATE T.L.RAMASWAMI PILLAI, AGED 54 YEARS, NOW RESIDING AT THOKKUVETTIL HOUSE ADIMALI P.O.,VIVEKANANDA NAGAR, ADIMALI-685561 BY ADVS. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI SRI.BENHUR JOSEPH MANAYANI RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR) KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION,KATTAPPANA, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 508. 2. THE KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, (KFC),VELLAYAMBALAM, TRIVANDRUM REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,PIN - 695 004. 3. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY TO FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,TRIVANDRUM - 695 001. R1, R3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN R2 BY ADV. SRI.M.M.SAYED MUHAMMED, SC, KFC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.14958 of 2011 ------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of June, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is the guarantor with respect to various loans availed from the 2nd respondent. Certain property belonging to the petitioner, which were mortgaged for securing the loan, were sold pursuant to the revenue recovery steps initiated. It is evident that by virtue of Ext.P1 judgment, this Court had set aside the sale of one item of property, on the basis of deposit made by the petitioner to the extent of the sale amount. 2. It is revealed that the petitioner had filed a review petition seeking a direction for release of the above said property. Since this Court was not inclined to entertain the review petition, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the same with liberty reserved to pursue the matter before the 2nd respondent, seeking one time settlement. 3. It is stated that the petitioner had now submitted Ext.P3 representation before respondents 2 and 3, seeking to consider the matter for 'one time settlement' under the schemes available. In this writ petition the petitioner is seeking a 2 W.P.(C).No.14958 of 2011 direction for an early consideration and disposal of Ext.P3 representation. 4. Heard ; learned standing counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent. It is pointed out that the 2nd respondent had received Ext.P3 representation only a few days back. It is further stated that the said representation will be processed and placed before the appropriate authority for taking a decision in accordance with the terms of the scheme formulated for one time settlement and in accordance with policy decisions adopted by the Corporation on the subject. 5. The above submission is recorded and the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to take effective steps for consideration and disposal of Ext.P3 representation. A decision on the basis of such request shall be taken at the earliest possible, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, at any rate within a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, Judge ami/