.^ ^- .L C^ ^^7 (. SSN6LE BENCH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. rs)No^3LIC> /2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENT(S) ^w cK67 '/^~ y^ ^'y / <4/ /v^ / Lal Bahadur Shah S/o Late Gopinath Shah Aged about 49 years R/o F-3, Kelo Project Colony, Lochan Nagar, Raigarh (CG) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Water Resources Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. Chhatdsgarh State Scheduled Tribe Commission, Through its President, 61, Jal Vihar Colony, Raipur (CG) 3. Engineer-in-Chief Water Resources Department Sihava Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 4. Shri P.D. Toppo Assistant Engineer Water Resources Department OfficeoftheSDO(E/M) Workshop Sub-Division, Atma Nagar, Machadoly, Distt. Korba (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT Or CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON'BLE MR..JUSTICE PRITINKERDIWAKBR.' PETJTI03NLBR W.P.fSi.NO. 5340/201X Lal Bahadur Shah veraus State of C.G. 8& Others Shri P.S.Koshy, counsel for the petiticner. Shri Praveen Das, Dy, A.G. forthe St&te. WRIT PETITION UNDBB.ARTICLE :286 QEt THB COJfSTITUTION OF JWDIA ORDER (12.09.20111 This petition is directed against the notice/letter dated 1.8.11 issued by the resp. No.2 asking the. petitioner certa:in documents'fbr verification of his castc. Contentiori of Shri Koshy^ counsel for the petitioner is that the respondent N0.2 is asking the petitioner to submit the revenue reoord prior to 1950 whereas as per the cii'cular of the State Govemment (Annexxjre P/ 13) dated 21.7,03 such documents cannot be asked from the petitioner. He further. submits that purpose of filing this petition vv'ould be ser^ed if direction is issued to the resp. N0.2 not to insist for the record v^hich cannot be called from the petitioner other^ise, State counsel points out that all the defence and a^erments ma.de by the petitioner in. the present petition can be made before the resp. Nc\2 while answering to the letter dated 1,8.201.1. He submits that let the petitioner bring all the facts within the knowledge of reap. No.2 and the same would be considered in accordai^oe with law. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner ' to apprise the resp. N0.2 about the correct factual and legal position and in the eventuaiity of doing so:^ it is expected from the resp, No.2 to decide the same in accordance with law without keeping any prejudice against the petitioner. With the above observation, the petition stands disposed of. ^^ VltK .$uA§e 1