IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 28th DAY OF MARCH, 2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. JAGANNATHAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO.10349/2011 BETWEEN: Sohan, S/o. Subhas Desai Age: 28 years, 0cc: Business R/o. Amminabhavi Tq. Dist. Dharwad PETITIONER (By Smt. S. M. Nadaf for B. V. Somapur, Adv.) AND: The State of Karnataka By PSI Dharwad Rural Police Station, Rep. by State Public Prosecutor, Dharwad, RESPONDENT (By Sri. Anand K. Navalgimath, HCGP) 2 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C SEEKING TO QUASH BY SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.01.2011 AND THE INTIMATION OF PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND ALSO THE CHARGE SHEET FILED BY THE RURAL POLICE, AGAINST HIM IN C.C.NO.29/2010, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) & JMFC, II COURT, DHARWAD. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Heard the petitioner’s Counsel and the learned High Court Government Pleader to take notice for the respondent-State. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the trial Court dismissing the application filed under Section 239 of Cr.P.C seeking discharge. Yr 3. The case in short is that, on account of the cable connection given by this petitioner to the complainant’s house, there was a electrocution leading to the complainant’s son getting electrocuted and offences under Section 304A of the IPC are alleged against the petitioner and his application for discharge came to be dismissed by the trial Court. 4. Having heard the petitioner’s Counsel and also the learned High Court Government Pleader for the State and after going through the order of the trial Court, in my view, it is the matter of evidence as to whether the petitioner to be relied on or not and this Court cannot go into that aspect while dealing with the petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. 5. It is the case of the prosecution that this petitioner gave connection to the cable T.V of the house 4 of Mehaboobkhan and the son of the complainant got electrocuted on touching the cable wire in the evening. 6. Having thus taken note of the material placed, it is not a fit case for this Court to interfere in the matter under Section 482 of Cr.PC. Hence the petition is rejected. Sd! 3UDGE gab/