1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.451 OF 2010. SHRI GULSHAN S/O PRITHVI RAJ PUNWATKAR VS STATE OF MAH THOUGH PSO PUSAD ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri N.A. Vyawahare Advocate for the applicant Shri D. B. Yengal APP for respondent State. Coram : A.H. JOSHI, J. Date : 29th March, 2010. 1. This is an application for bail under section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code. 2. Offence under Section 366-A, 342 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code has been registered in crime no.49 of 2010 of Police Station, Pusad. 3. Perused the First Information Report and statement of the witnesses contained in the case diary. 4. Perusal complaint reveals as follows: (a) The complainant is of 17 years of age. (b) The accused took her and kept under confinement for some time. 2 (c) The complainant was taken to unknown place and she did not know the exact address of the said location and the said act of confinement has occurred at said place. 5. Whatever has come on record, does not describe the commission of offence under Section 366-A of Indian Penal code. However, the description of event is prima facie adequate enough to bring the case within the compass of Section 355 of the Indian Penal Code. 6. In this background, the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail. 7. Learned APP states that the chargesheet is expected to be filed within 2 weeks. 8. Applicant is at liberty to apply after the charge-sheet is filed. 9. Application is rejected. Judge |mule| 3