IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1644 of 2011 1. SHEO MOHAR YADAV SON OF ANGRAHIT YADAV 2. KAMLESH YADAV SON OF BALESHWAR YADAV 3. DHANJI YADAV SON OF SHEO MOHAR YADAV R/O- VILLAGE UTTARDAHA, P.S.- TIYER, DIST. BHOJPUR. 4. BIJENDRA YADAV SON OF SAMHUT YADAV R/O- VILLAGE YADOPUR, P.S.- TIYER, DIST. BHOJPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BHOJPUR 3. D.C.L.R.JAGDISHPUR, P.S.- JAGDISHPUR, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR 4. CIRCLE OFFICER, JAGDISHPUR, P.S.- JAGDISHPUR, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR. 5. RAJNATH YADAV SON OF LAL MOHAR YADAV 6. MAHAVIR YADAV SON OF SHEO JI YADAV R/O- VILLAGE MANUDIHARI, P.S.-TIYER, DISTT. BHOJPUR. 2 27.01.2011 Petitioners are aggrieved by all the three orders passed by the respondent Circle Officer, D.C.L.R. and the Deputy Collector in connection with a mutation proceeding. Thus, there is concurrent findings of facts against the petitioners recorded by all the three courts. This Court is, therefore, not inclined to interfere with the orders impugned. Petitioners, if so advised, may take recourse to any other legal forum available in law. The application is disposed of. pkj (Kishore K. Mandal, J)