IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 645 of 2008 (M/S) Vishnu Prakash Agarwal, S/O Sri Vishambher Saran Agarwal, R/O Mohalla Sidhiyan, Member, Kashipur Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. Kashipur ( Udham Singh Nagar). …… Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Registrar, Co-operative Society Dehradun and three others. … Respondents. Sri Arvind Vashist & Mr. H.M.Bhatia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri K.P. Upadhyay, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the respondent no. 1&2-State. Sri Manoj Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent no.3. Sri G.K.Verma, learned counsel for the respondent no.4. Date April 16, 2008. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Stay Application) Sri Manoj Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.3 files his power. The same is taken on record. This writ petition has been filed to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned notice/order for delimitation and reservation of the ward/area for reconstitution of the committee of management dated 3-4-2008 (Annexure No.1). Prayer to restrain the respondent nos. 1 and 2 from conducting the proceedings for delimitation and reservation of the ward/area in pursuance of the aforesaid notice/order has also been made. Heard. During the course of course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a prayer that he has already 2 filed objection before the District Assistant Registrar as required under Rule 450(5) of the Uttarakhand Co-operative Societies Rules 2004. The petitioner is a member of the society and, before expiry of the term of the Management Committee, he was chairman of the outgoing Committee of Management. By the impugned advertisement (Annexure No.1), provisional determination of the constituencies for the election of delegates of the Kashipur Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. was published in the newspaper on 3-4-2008 under Section 29(3) of the Uttarakhand Co-operative Societies Act 2003 read with Rule 450 of the aforesaid Rules. According to the petitioner, he had already filed objection. The objection is yet to be considered and decided on the 13th day from the date of publication of election notice (Annexure No.1) by the District Assistant Registrar as per Rule 450(7) of the Rules and on 15th day, final determination of the constituencies shall be made as per Clause (8) of the said Rules. The writ petition has been filed much before the expiry of 13th day from the date of publication of notice. The writ petition is premature and is liable to be dismissed outright at the threshold. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. All pending applications stand disposed of. ( B.S.Verma, J. ) RCP 3 4