IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30770 of 2009 RUPAK MISHRA @ ABHANAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 7.9.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a Police case under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 307 of the Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and ¾ of the Explosive Substance Act. The submission is that no one sustained injuries. There is no evidence of explosion of bomb. Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has criminal antecedent revealed in Paragraph 11 of four cases. The impugned order of rejection notices that there was no injury and that the submission appears to be correct and convincing. Having considered the fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 50,000/- (fifty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Samastipur Town P.S. Case No.156 of 2009. Both the sureties of the petitioner must be his father and mother respectively whose photographs and proof of residence must be appended to the bail bonds. In the event that the petitioner defaults in appearance, the Court below shall be at liberty to appropriately proceed against 2 the sureties also and if he misuses the privilege of bail then the prosecution shall be at liberty to move before the Court below for cancellation of the present bail of the petitioner. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)