IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.9746 of 2008. Decided on: 14.12.2010. Joginder Singh . ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M.Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr.R.P.Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he has not been considered for promotion to the higher post, though vacancies were available. The respondents-State has not filed any reply on this issue. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion in accordance with law within a period of two months from due date, if not already considered, after production of the certified copy of the judgment by the petitioner. In case the petitioner’s case is considered favourly, he shall be entitled to all consequential benefits. No costs. December 14, 2010. (Rajiv Sharma) (krt) Judge. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.