-..^^"f .fs-. R ^-^-^.-^,-, IN THE HIGH^COUCT OF JTJDICATTJRE-AT JABALPUR . ^4<^op T IT PETITION NO' 'OP 1997 frTRIT PETITION UKTDER ARTICIfi 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION 'GT? INDIA) PETITIONER; aftifiss' RESPONDENTS! Dr. s.K. Dhagarewar, son ofshri R.R. Dhagarawar, aged. about 35 years, Assistant surgeon, Primary Health Centre, Dantewada, Distt. Bastar (rtP). • -VersUs- 1« Union of lndia> ttirough - Ministry o£ Armeel Forces, North Block, New Delhi. 2. The Director GeneEal» Border Security Force, 10, C.G.O. Complex. L$dhi Road, New Belfai* Co-v^'T~.ai^rfa'*\^ 3. GuaiaaB^ant, 66 BataU-iaa, 6Gs ^ E'od'Ct,) | |"QLV| P"r';lc'r-3c'r"irtl-y Fnr'Ti- , Ko-rc^C'r 9<-c>A->-i* h< JaioalmoE (najaattaaiL) . .^ .'Ftr'r'^£-/4f<^nn'?. TheSuperintendentofPolice, ^ .<-"'"' ^ ,^ (^ Q.Vh 'VTVU. w^"^ ^'"1^ ^<^t Jagdulpur. Distt. Jagdal-par (MP)< TSOut-rt-b-t V-CLI-AC\ '"^)'C!LA-,f|-<t,('\^<<((&.i WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 CF TI-iE CONSTITOTION OF INDIA ^ ^' ''l'balsur HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2427 of 1997 Petitioner Dr. S. K. Dhagammar Versus Respondents Uuion of India aad others Sii^e Beneh : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. ^pihotri. None for fhe petitioner. • Shri S. K. Beriwal, Standiug counsel for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (27«hJuiie, 2006) : The foUowmg order offhe Courtwas passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. The inatter is caUed for hearing twice. On bofh the occasions, none appears nor any representation is niade onbehatfofthe petidoner. In view of fhe above, fhe pctition stands disinissed for want ofprosecution. 1. 2. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge