^rs, ^ /• -^' . C ^; 1^>^_ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR ^^ '°(, s W.P.ISINQ. ^ u /2Q08 PBTITIONER Ahilya Miahra, aged about 29 years, D/o SItri V.N, Mishra, R/o Shiv Sadan, Ravi Nagar, Kasturba •IMagar, Smdhi Colony, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS ^" RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through ; Secretary, General Adiainistratio.n Department, ..•••^/ D.K.S, Bhawan, Raipur (C,G.) ,^.,S<U3/ / 2. The Secretary of Home ^ •'fLj-fi^' Department, D.K.S, Bhawan, •••^'Sy Raipur (C.G.) ^•^•<^ <L*.'r ...-•''' ^ i 3, ' Chhattis&arh PubUc Service ^ /.d? / Commisaon, Through : The ^O ^ Secretary, Shaiikar Nagar, ^^^... s'"^r ,^^..&-'' 4.-^ RoktmiaRai,D/OShriD.P, Ko' Ral, Aged about 32 Years, R/0 D.P. Rai Bhawan, Naya Sarkanda, Bangalipara, Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Gropi Cliand Mesbram, aged ahaut 26, Deputy ^\ Superintendent of Police , 1 jj R/0 C/0 C.G. Police f^f/ Academy, C.haadr,akhuri, ^/ Mandir Hasod, District Raipl.iT (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA 1 i\\v HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 3065 of2008 Petitioner Ahilya Mishra Versus Respondents Stete of Chhatdsgarh & others WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA. (SB: Hon'ble ShriSatfah K. AgnihotoriJ.) vf Ms Sunita Jain, Advocate for fhe petitioncr, Shri Yashwaat Siagh Thakur, Deputy Advocate Greneral for fhe respondents No. 1 & 2/State. Shri B. D. Guru, Advocate for fhe respondent No. 3/ PSC. ni «* ORDBR (oraB (Passed onfhis 16th day ofNovcmber, 2009) Heard. By fhis petitiou the petitioner seeks to quash fhe select/merit Ust dated 17th May, 2007, issued by the Chliatdsgarh PubUc Service Commission on the grozind that it is violative offhe Chhattisgarh Police Executive (Gazetted) Services Recruitment aud Proiaotion Riiles, 2005 (for short 'fhe Rules, 2005') aad further a direction to ftie respondent authorities to issue a fresh select/merit Ust in accordaace wifh fhe Rutes, 2005 for fhe post of Depuly Superintendent of Police with aU consequential benefits. Leamed counsel appearing fdr the pardes joiafly subinit fhat fhe issue iavolved hercin this petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court, pronounced today i.e. 16th November, 2009, m Ricba Midu-a Vs. State of CUiattisgarh 85 ofhers aad other coimected inatters. In view of the foregoing, fhis petition stands disposed of in terms ofthe judgment ia Richa Mishra (supra). No order asto costs. Thnkur Sd/- Satish K. Agi Judge