IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 23016 of 2001 Between: 1 S. Divkar Rao S/o. Late S.Subbaiah, R/o.B-40,F-5,I Floor, P.S.Nagar, Vijaynagar Colony, Hyderabad. 2 C.V.R.K.SubbaRao S/o.Somayajulu, R/o.B-40,F-II floor, P.S.Nagar, Vijaynagar Colony, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Regional Manager, A.P.Housing Board, Kukatpally Region, Bharathnagar,Kukatpally, Hyderabad. 2 Deputy Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Circle IV, Khairathabad, Hyderabad. 3 Kasim Mirza, R/o. B-40, F-6,Ground Floor, P.S.Nagar Vijaynagar colony, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: NONE APPEARED. Counsel for the Respondents: --- The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the inaction of the respondents Nos.1 and 2 in not taking any action upon the representation made by petitioner No.1 dated 5-11-2001 as null, void and illegal and arbitrary and further directing the respondents No.1 and 2 to take immediate action upon the representation dated. 5-11-2001 and to demolish the unauthorised construction including the shed (garage) constructed by respondent No.3 in open space on the ground Floor B-40, F-6, P.S.Nagar,Vijaynagar colony, Hyderabad and earmark space on the ground floor for each flat.” Both on 13-03-2009 and also today, there has been no representation for the petitioners. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing their cause in this writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in default. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 16th March, 2009 vrn