IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.28363 of 2010 KANAHIYA LAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 03.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Informant’s father went with this petitioner and one, Bharat Sah and thereafter, disappeared is corroborated by several witnesses. Stress is on the statement of witnesses recorded in paragraphs 79 and 80 of the case diary to the effect that victim was a drunkard and in habit disappeared earlier also but only after a years of the case may not negate the assertion made by witnesses at early stage. Even till today informant’s father is traceless. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)