R.S.A No. 3598 of 2007 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M No.10026 C of 2007 and R.S.A No. 3598 of 2007 Date of decision : November 03, 2008 Dalel ...... Appellant through Mr.Harkesh Manuja, Advocate v. Dariyav Singh and others, ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) C.M.No.10026 C of 2007 For the reasons recorded in the application, delay of 46 days in filing the appeal is condoned. C.M stands disposed of. R.S.A No.3598 of 2007 The appeal has been filed against concurrent judgments of the Courts below dismissing the suit of the plaintiff/appellant for declaration that he has become the owner of the land in dispute. The plea of the plaintiff/appellant was that his father had given the land in dispute by way of a family settlement about 22 years prior to the filing of the suit. Both Courts have found that the plaintiff/appellant has not been able to substantiate the plea of entering into the family settlement and have R.S.A No. 3598 of 2007 ::2:: consequently dismissed the suit. Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to persuade me that the findings of fact, recorded by the Courts below, are perverse or cannot be held to have arisen from the evidence recorded. Consequently, I hold that the substantial questions of law proposed do not arise in this appeal. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 03 , 2008. JUDGE `kk'