IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.8532 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.5.2011 Sandeep ......Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & others ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Jitender Nara, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar, J.(Oral) In the present case, the petitioner has laid challenge to mutation of land in dispute whereby ownership has been changed in the name of Gram Panchayat, Village Silani Jalam, Tehsil Jhajjar, Distt. Rohtak in view of provisions of Act No.9 of 1992 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulations) Act, 1961. In support of his case, the petitioner has submitted that in view of a Full Bench judgment of this Court in the case of “Jai Singh versus State of Haryana 2003 (2) RCR (Civil) 578, the proprietors of land of “Mushtarka Jumla Malkan Wa Digar Haqdaran Hassab Rasad Rakba Khewat” cannot be deprived of their rights in the land on the basis of provisions of Act No.9 of 1952. However, this Court finds that there is not an iota of evidence to establish the factum that the petitioner is a proprietor of the village or he/his predecessor-in-interest have contributed any land to the land in dispute. It seems that the factual foundation is lacking. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file fresh one after giving better particulars. With the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn. May 13, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE