1 abs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 64 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 2401 OF 2007 Kasim Ismail & Ors. .. Plaintiffs V/s Purushotam Meghji & Ors. .. Defendants Mr. R.B. Paranjape for the plaintiffs. Mr. P.G. Lad, A.G.P. for defendant no.5. Mr. R.D. Soni i/b Mr. S.D. Mishra for defendant no.6. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 26th APRIL 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. By this chamber summons, the plaintiffs seeks leave to amend the plaint. I have perused the draft amendment as well as the plan proposed to be annexed to the plaint by means of an amendment. Amendment appears to be clarificatory in nature and I see no reason to disallow the amendment. 3. Learned counsel for the defendants submits that the amendment does not clearly describe the suit property and 2 the measurements are not given. It is open to the defendants to raise these objections and other objections, if any, after the plaint is amended. Amendment cannot be refused on the ground that clarification is not complete. 4. In the circumstances, the chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment shall be carried out within 2 weeks. Amended copy of the plaint be served on the appearing defendants through their attorneys and the others personally. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)