IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 8539 of 2010 Decided on: December 29, 2010. Narain Singh. ….Petitioner Versus HRTC. ….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:- “(a) to issue a writ of mandamus, appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, directing the respondent Corporation to consider and promote the petitioner with all the consequential benefits to the post of Inspector w.e.f. 27/09/2008, when the incumbents junior to the petitioner were considered and promoted by the respondent Corporation with all the consequential benefits and arrears alongwith interest thereon 18% pa;” 2. Annexure P-10, notice has already been served on the respondent. There will be a direction to the respondent to look into Annexure P-10 and take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment by the petitioner. While taking action in the matter of promotion, it is made clear that any promotion, if made in the meanwhile, will be subject to the decision thus taken by the respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. December 29, 2010. ( Justice V.K. Sharma ), (vs) Judge. 2