lA'aV^ ^- (S) ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS^ARHA'LSILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRYT PETITION N0. { 2^3 2L /2004 PETITIONER Sideshwar, aged about 45 years, son of Shri Phool Singh, resident of village - Dhodhopuri (Ghoghopuri) Tah. Gurur, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS L. RESPQNDENTS 1. .^p' .4 ^0'..' ^'c^, \^- ^- ;^ 3. 4. S^ate of Chhattisgarh, through : The Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Chhattisgarh Board of Ayurvedic and Unani System of Medicine and ^aturopathy, Raipur : through : Its Registrar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The State of Madhya Pradesh through : Its Secretary Department of Health and Family Welfare Mantralay, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) r^ The MP Board ofAyurvedic and Unani System of medicine and Naturopathy, Madhya Pradesh, through : The Registrar, Shyamla Hills, Bhopal (M.P.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLES 22i6/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA iXI-HC—78 ^iT^y^ f<riii<* IWTF^^T^T^W l!:'j. *ii*i<»ii%»^icn ^^T ';?n?:n^pt, ^w i<o, [s<idiy!^ .(^J..€...i4t?&loLi<...»....!•^200 3fl^?T TR^ ('jqi^q^f) ?'NW^f^T3^T 1S,2,2QQS Shri P.P. Sahu^ counsel for |;he pefcitioner, Smt. Fouzia Mii^a, Panel LNwyer for the State. The; petitioner has preferrec| ihe Constitution of India auestiorl resDondenr No,2^ had refused to the pu.rpose of applying for registr| The case of the petitioner is| ^his.writ petitiQn underArticIe 226/227 of |ing .the action of respondent No.2 whereby lupply enroilmerit form to the petitioner for Kiun as: Ayur/edic practmoner. |that hei had aoquired quaHficafion In Vaidya Vishamd from Hindi Sahitya SamINieIan Prayag, which wa^ reoognised uuder rhe Adhiniyam, 1970, but by noti|lcationl dated 4J11.8°, the sai.d recognition was withdrawn .with effect from 4.1 obfameci the degree. before 4,11| therefore, wnen ;he started the p^ claim of the petitioner is that in tn| Writ .Petition No.287/90 between No,2 ought fo nave supplied the fc|: fche light ofjudgment passed by Ml Having heaixi learned coun facts and eircumsfances b£.theoa< enrolliTient forrn to petitioner and a decisiox^ about the eligibility of judgiiient passed by M.P, High Col.irt in W.P, No.287/90, With the aforesaid directiorl Conaequently, M..W. P. No. | disposed of. Certified copy as per rules . <=ni<4(<n<il<i ^l^^f ^ f^t lf^H:$R ^3tfOT3TT^T ,|111.89. The claim of the petitioner is that he |:80: and since then he is, practicing :a.nd I'actice, ;the degree was recogmzed. Further jlight of thejydgmenfcGf.H,P.High Court in IShekhar Jain v^ Stafce of M,P/, respondent jrm and! consideii the case ofthe petrtioner in |P- High Court, Annexure P-I, L^el for the parties and having regard to the [e, respondent No. 2 is direeted tQ.supplythe jafter rebeiving fcljie forni, respondent No.2 to ascertain and exaraine the claim. 4^^-de te the petitioner :and thereafter to take ,he petifcioner for registration in the light of , the petition stands disposed of. .155/04 & I.A.NQ.2094/04 .also ' stand Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge