IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.332 of 2011 SHIV CHANDRA THAKUR SON OF LATE RATNESHWAR THAKUR, R/O VILLAGE- DHANDUAH, P.S.- JANDAHA, DISTRICT- VAISHALI ………………………..PETITIONER Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, C.G.O., COMPLEX, LODI ROAD, NEW DELHI BY NAME ( K. M. SINGH) 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL C.I.S.F. (EAST ZONE), PATLIPUTRA COLONY, BORING ROAD, PATNA BY NAME ( BINOD KUMAR GUPTA) 4. THE ASSISTANT INSPECTOR GENRAL (RECRUITMENT) CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE, HEAD QUARTER, NEW DELHI BY NAME (DEO SINGH RAWAT) 5. THE DY. INSPECTOR GENRAL C.I.S.F., B.C.C. UNIT, P.O.- KOYALA NAGAR, DHANBAD (JHARKHAND) 6. THE COMMANDENT C.IS.F., UNIT DHANBAD, B.C.C.I, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, KOYALA NAGAR, DHANBAD BY NAME (B.S. VERMA) …………………………….RESPONDEN ******** For the Petitioner :- Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Union of India :- Mr. Raghib Ahsan, A. S. G. ************* 2 08/03/2011 This contempt application has been filed alleging violation of order dated 16.7.2009 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in L.P.A. No. 711 of 2009 wherein direction was issued to the Union of India for consideration of the candidature of the appellant for compassionate appointment in accordance with the policy decision of the Union of India, if any. An order has been passed on 5.5.2010 by the respondent department which was also communicated to the petitioner herein informing him that as per his qualification, he is not eligible to claim compassionate 2 appointment. In view of the above facts, we do not find any violation of the order passed by this Court and we give liberty to the petitioner to challenge the same before the appropriate forum, if so aggrieved. With the aforesaid observation, this contempt application is disposed of. (T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) avin