ladda IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 3222 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No. OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant. vs. Pramod Dattatray Shinde & Ors ..Respondents. Mr Rajesh More, A.P.P. for the Applicant-State. CORAM: BILAL NAZKI AND A.R.JOSHI,JJ DATED: 14TH OCTOBER,2009 P.C.:- 1. The respondents-accused were tried by the Judicial Magistrate, F.C. Roha, District Raigad and were convicted for the offence punishable under Section 326 read with section 149 of the I.P.C., and they were accordingly sentenced to undergo R.I.for the period of 12 months and to pay fine of Rs. 3000/-each. The respondents went in appeal before the learned Sessions Judge, Mangaon, District Raigad and they were acquitted by the learned Sessions Court for the reasons mentioned in paragraph 30 of the impugned judgment. Paragraph 30 of the impugned judgment reads as under:- The Medical Officer has admitted in the cross-examination that injury Nos.1 and 2 (CLW) are possible if some one comes in the contact with tin sheet, iron bar or iron sheet etc. The injury No.4 is possible if the person falls from the tree or from the scooter or wall. It may be noted that complainant is an agriculturist and such accidental injuries are also possible . 2. The above reasons can be ascertained from the evidence produced. Since these conclusions are possible to be drawn. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any ground to interfere in the impugned judgment and order. In this view of the matter, leave to appeal is rejected. Application is disposed of. (BILAL NAZKI,J) (A.R.JOSHI,J)