IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 20TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 29TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 31362 of 2009(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. VISHNU M, AGE 21 YEARS, S/O.MOHANAN, EETTIVILAYIL HOUSE, ELAMANNOR P.O., MANGAD, ALEYILPADI, PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. ARUN REJEE, AGED 20, S/O. REJI, VALIYAVEETTIL HOUSE, MAHADEVIKAD P.O., KARTHIKAPPALLY, ALAPPUZHA. 3. JITHIN ROY JOSEPH, S/O. ROY JOSEPH, MEKKATT HOUSE, VAKAYAR P.O., KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA. 4. MIDHUN M, AGED 20, S/O. MURALEEDHARAN, MIDHUN BHAVAN, VETTITHITTA P.O., ALIMUKKU, PATHANAMTHITTA. 5. ARUN SOMAN, AGD 20, S/O. SOMARAJAN, MANTHANETHU HOUSE, PAYYANAMON P.O., KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA. 6. ADARSH B. AGED 20, S/O. BHUVANESWARAN, MURUPPEL VADAKKATHIL VALLICODE, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI.G.BENO SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE PRINCIPAL,SAHODARAN AYYAPPAN SMARAKA SNDP YOGAM COLLEGE, KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. DR. BINU, VICE PRINCIPAL, HEAD OF HINDI DEPARTMENT, SAHODARAN AYYAPPAN SMARAKA SNDP YOGAM COLLEGE, KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST. 3. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, M.G. UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM DIST. ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R1,2 SRI.S.SUJIN FOR R1 SMT.NITA.N.S. FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 31362 of 2009 APPENDIX Petitioners Exhibits: Ext.P1: True copy of the suspension memo of the 2nd petitioner. Ext.P2: True copy of the letter of the 1st respondent. Ext.P3: True copy of the representation of the petitioners to the 1st respondent. True copy/ P.A. To Judge THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (C) No. 31362 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 20th day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T Following earlier orders, the petitioners and their parents were heard by the Managing Committee of the institution. The parents of the girl students at whose instance the petitioner were being proceeded against, also had discussions with the parents of the petitioners. As a consequence, the petitioners would express unconditional apology before the College Council. This should put the entire issues to a happy end. The writ petition will therefore stand ordered directing that the petitioner will abide by the decision of the management following the aforesaid. The request of the petitioner to regularize their attendance will also be considered sympathetically by the appropriate authority. ( THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) jma