IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1442 of 2010 In (CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE 7243/2008) Prithwiraj Shrivastava S/O Late J.N. Lal R/O Mohalla- D-3, Vijay Narain Nagar, Hanuman Nagar, Kankarbagh, P.S.- Patrakar Nagar, Kankarbagh, Distt.- Patna ………Appellant. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Commissioner-Cum-Secretary Department Of Personnel And Administrative Reforms, Government Of Bihar, Patna 3. The Special Secretary Department Of Personnel And Administrative Reforms, Government Of Bihar, Patna 4. The Deputy Secretary Department Of Personnel And Administrative Reforms, Government Of Bihar, Patna …………… Respondents. For the appellant : Mr. AsbtoshKumar, Adv. For the State : Mr.Madhuresh Prasad, G.P.12 : Mr.Prabhat Ranjan, A.C. to GP.12. ---------------------------------- 4. 9.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the State. The writ Court has considered various objections of the appellant/writ-petitioner to the order imposing some punishment and come to a finding that the procedure which was followed for conducting the departmental proceeding was in compliance of Rue 55 of the Classification, Control and Appeal Rues, 1930. The learned writ Court has also noticed that so far the issue of non-examination of witness is concerned charges for which examination of witness was essential have been found to be not proved on that ground and the charges which have been found proved are based on 2 documents on record. In the facts of the case, we do not find any error in the judgment and order of the writ Court. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Jay/ ( Shiva Kirti Singh,J) (Shivaji Pandey, J)