lijj. •^- PETITIONER Plaintiff/ ResDondent-1 H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRITPETITION N0.3072 OF 2004 Rakesh Dua, S/o Late Prannath Dua, aged 43 years, R/o Main Road, IVIungeli Naka Chowk, Kududand, Bilaspur (CG), P.S. Tah. District Bilaspur (CG). DEFENDANTS & Appeiiant 1 & 2 Def.No. 3&4 Res.No. 2 & 3 Def. No. 5 Res.No. 4 Def. No. 6A & 68 Res.No. 5 & 6 Versus 1. Madhur Dua, S/o Nikesh Kumar Dua, aged 21 years. 2 Smt. Anita Dua, W/o Late Nikesh Kumar Dua, aged 42 years. Both 1 and 2 R/o near Devkinandan Crematory, Sarkanda, P.S. Tah. Distt. Bilaspur (CG). 3. Ashish Dua, aged 38 years, S/o Krishna Kumar @Sushil Dua. 4. Akash Dua, aged 33 years, S/o Krishna Kumar @ Sushi! Dua. Both 3 and 4 Rto iyiain Road, Sarkanda.P.S. Tah. Distt. Bilaspur (CG). 5 Smt. Kiran Bala, W/o Shri Bhusan Kumar, aged 55 years, R/o Qr. No.5/25, Bungalow Priyadarshini Nagar, Bilaspur, P.S. Tah. Bitaspur (CG). 6. Amit Dua, aged 31 years, S/o Late Ashok KumarDua. 7. Alok Dua, aged 38 years, S/o Late Ashok Kumar Dua. Def. No. 7 Res.No. 7 Appellant No.3 Def.No.8 Both R/o Ashok Rice Miil, Main Road, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, P.S. Tah. Distt. Bilaspur (CO). 8. Krishna Kumar @ Sushil Dua,S/o Late Kashiram Dua, aged 62 years, R/o Main Road, Sarkanda, P.S. Tah. Distt. Bilaspur (CG). 9. Smt. Neeta Dua, Wto Late Naresh Kumar Dua, aged 38 yeara, R/o in bank pfArpa river, Gond Para, P.S. Tah. Distt. Bilaspur (CG). Def.No. 9 10. State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, Res.No. 8 Bilaspur,District Biiaspur (CG). (Writpetition under Articte 226/227 of the Constrtution of india) '^ Single Bench : Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Ravish Verma, counsel for the pelitioner. Shri Ramakant Pandey, counsel for the respondent No.2. Shri Rawndra Agrawal, counsel for the respondents No. 3, 4, 5 & 8. Shri Ratnesh Kumar Agrawat, counsel for the respondent No.9. Shri Vinay Harit, Dy. Advocate General for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 25 day of September, 2008) Lsarned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw Uiis petition, to which learned counsel appearing fbr the respondents have no objection. 2) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as wiiftdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 3) Consequently, M.(W.).p.Nos.2681/2004 stands disposed of. Gowri Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge