IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6845 of 2008 HARENDRA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 15.5.2008 Petitioner, Harendra Yadav, is an accused in a case instituted under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard the learned Advocate of the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P. for the State. It has been submitted by the learned Advocate of the petitioner that as per the evidence available in the case diary, the petitioner was admittedly not present at his house at the time of the alleged occurrence. The learned Advocate referred paragraphs 6, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 29 of the case diary in which the witnesses have stated that from two months ago the petitioner was in Punjab. The learned Advocate submitted that in the subsequent statements, the informant at paragraph 6 and the mother of the deceased at paragraph 29 of the case diary, have stated that this petitioner, who happens to be the husband of the deceased, was in Punjab since two months ago. Considering the submissions of both sides, petitioner, Harendra Yadav, is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast track Court No. IV, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Sessions Trial No.642 of 2007 arising out of Jogapatti P.S. Case No.241 of 2006. BT (Syed Md. Mahfooz Alam, J)