mm man count oFmmmaa AT mmspug WRIT Parmon an.@m g WQE No...” .1. LEELARAM YADAV Agadmaws. Sin iate arm, Sitaram Yadav Residentaf mm Chm $amanda, Bilasyur (Chhattiagamj / «VERsvS- (1) Shula of chhauisgam, Through Secretaty, Dapartment of integrated child devempment Service. D.K.S.Bhavan, Manualya Raipur ($13} Union Of lndia, through Secratary, Depamnent of Persanal Puhnc Griavanoes New Delhi. Commissioner, tans. Behind D.KJ$J Ehawan Raipur. (C.G.) f District Chitd Dwaiopment Omcer, integrated child development Service Biiaapur. (CG) OND Aims Rum §X¢ FOR! E As IT D 'REC . HIGH COURT OF CHHATFISGARH AT B1LASPUR g» Writ Petition No. 1478 of 2006 Leelaram Yadav Pgtitioner Versus Regpondents Single Bench : Hon’ble Mr. Jus‘icc Satish K. Agihotri. Shri Prakash Tiwali, Advocat€ for the petitioner. Shri G. K. Beriwal, Deputy Advocate General. State of Chhattisgarh 6r, others ORAL CREER (28th March, 2006) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that father of the petitioner Shn' Sitaram Yadav died in harness on 25.12.2001 while working as peon in the omce of fhe depaxtment of Integrated Child Development Services. The petitioner made an application in proper proforma. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is covered by the decision 20. 12.2005 of this Court passed in W.P.No. 3563/2004 (Shveta Dwivedi Vs. State of Chhath'sgarh 3; ’ others) and other connected matters, wherein this Court passed the 4 following order:- “8. In View of the submissions made by leanied counsel appearing for the paities, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the ease, in the opinion of this Court, ends of justice will be served if a direction is given to the State and the authoxities concerned to consider and decide the cases of the petitioners/dependants of the employees who died on 1.11.1997 and thereafter in accordance with the policy which was in force at the time of death of the employee. Each and every individual case will be decided and if the person found eligible, appointment orders will be issued as early as possible on or before 30th April, 2006. The petitioners are also directed to render due co-operation to the @ authon'ties. It is made clear that if any grievance still remains, the petiticmers may avail the remedy available under the law including fih'ng of the petition before this Coult.” ‘ manned coutxsel for the petitioner also placed reliance on the Circular No. 942/ 264/ 2005/ 1-3, Raipur dated 8th December, 2005, issued by the General Administratipn Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, which is issued with regard to pmviding compassionate appointment on the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade-III. In view of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of iinally in terms of the order dated 20m December, 2005 passed by this Court in W.P.No. 3563/2004 and other connected mattexs as well as the Circular dated 8th December, 2005 issued by the General Adminisnation Department, Govt. of Chhattisgarh. No order as to costs. Certified copy, as per Rules. Satish K. Agnihom i’ Judge l 1‘) Sd/~ Thakur