IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32366 of 2007 SUNIL KUMAR SINGH ……..PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. KAMALA SINGH ……..OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 5. 10.11.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as opposite party no. 2. This application for cancellation of bail has been filed only on the ground of criminal antecedent. However, on perusal of the impugned order dated 19.6.2007 it appears that the opposite party no.2 is not the assailant of the victim. This is a case under Section 307 IPC. Under the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order granting bail to opposite party no.2. Accordingly, this application is rejected. However, opposite party no. 2 is directed to fully co-operate in early disposal of the case without making any hindrance failing which court below shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bonds. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)