HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA W.P.No.18855 of 2009 ORDER:- The matter is coming up for admission. 2. Heard Sri Chidambaram, the learned Counsel representing the writ petitioner and the learned A.G.P. for School Education representing respondent. 3. The writ petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondent in not considering the representation dt.3-6-2009 for recounting of marks of the petitioner in SSC examinations held in March, 2009 vide Hall Ticket No.09-09130667 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondent to produce the answer sheets of all the subjects for perusal of this Court duly considering the representation dt.3-6- 2009 and pass such other suitable orders. 4. The instructions obtained by the learned A.G.P. for School Education are placed before this Court. 5. Sri Chidambaram however would maintain that in the facts and circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate to permit the petitioner to look into the relevant papers relating to the examinations for the purpose of satisfying herself about the marks obtained. However, the learned A.G.P. for School Education would submit that except in Maths, after recounting, it was shown as ‘44’ instead of ‘43’ originally shown and there is absolutely no change. 6. Heard the Counsel. 7. The affidavit filed in support of the writ petition is sworn to by the father of the writ petitioner B.Sai Amrutha. It is stated by the deponent that his daughter studied S.S.C. in Vaidhin Public School (Code No.08462) Mummidivaram, East Godavari District and his daughter appeared for the said examinations held in the month of March, 2009 vide Roll No.09-09130667 and the said examinations were held in S.K.Mahila Junior College, Mummidivaram, East Godavari District being center code No.02507 and she wrote all examinations very well and she expected the marks above 500 as she is very meritorious student from the very beginning. However, to their utter surprise it was declared that she passed her S.S.C. with II Division with 306 marks out of 600 marks. They obtained marks through E-Seva and those are specified below: a) Telugu - 74 (1st language) b) Hindi - 40 (2nd lagnauge) c) English - 56 (3rd language) d) Maths - 43 e) General science - 55 f) Social studies - 38 Further it is stated that having known the details of marks, the petitioner worried a lot as she has been studying in high profile from the beginning itself. In such circumstances, they applied for recounting for all subjects duly enclosing D.D. for Rs.900/- vide D.D.No.578485, dt.1-6-2009 drawn on SBI, Mummidivaram in favour of the respondent and handed over the application in the Office of the respondent on 3-6- 2009 and their office issued the receipt No.10226, however so far neither the petitioner was intimated nor they are responding though they approached personally in the Office of the respondent. In such circumstances, they are approaching this Court having fed with the bovine insensible way of persuasion of the applications for counting. Further it is also stated that it is the duty of the respondents in responding to their request. The petitioner is expected more than 500 marks out of 600 marks and they are reasonably suspecting that some mistake or error occurred while awarding or counting the marks, therefore, it is just and necessary to direct the respondents to produce the answer sheets of the petitioner for perusal of this Court in the interest of justice. If the answer sheets are perused by this Court the real truth and the injustice caused to the petitioner will come out. 8. The relevant instructions placed before this Court are as hereunder:- Rc.No.151/D9-1/2009 Dt.11-9-2009 Name of the candidate: Bayyavarapu Sai Amrutha, D/o.Bayyavarapu Pallam Raju Roll No.09130667/09 Subject Before Recounting After Recounting Telugu 74 No change Hindi 40 No change English 56 No change Maths 43 44 Science 55 No change Social 38 No change 9. Except the change of marks in Maths – 43 to 44 before recounting and after recounting, there appears to be no change at all. In the light of the same, since this Court is satisfied that further perusal of the answer sheets may not improve the situation in any way. This Court is not inclined to grant any direction whatsoever. 10. Accordingly, in the light of the instructions, the writ petition shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ Justice P.S.Narayana 17th September, 2009 smr/pn