1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.502/2006 (Deelip s/o Uttam Patil Vs. The Sabhapati, Krushi Utpanna Bazar Samiti,Amalner ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.VY Patil, Adv. for petitioner; Mr.Girish Rane, Adv. for sole respondent. ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 27 th September, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) Rule was issued on 18.4.2006 without any interim relief. 3) The petitioner was appointed with the respondent-Market Committee as a peon and he thereafter got, according to him, favourable position. His services were terminated allegedly on 25.10.1991 without following due process, which was the subject matter of challenge before the Labour Court, who by order dated 16th April, 2005, after going through the merits of the record, did not concur to the urge of the petitioner and consequently the Reference (ID) No. 12/2002 came to be dismissed. 4) The learned Presiding Officer of the Labour Court has observed that there was no bias in dealing with the petitioner 2 from the employer/Committee. The petitioner could not indicate that he was continuously in service with the Respondent-Market Committee since 8.6.1988 as a Peon on monthly wages of Rs.940/- and that he has completed 240 days in a year. The learned Judge, on analysis of evidence, also found that when the petitioner was not working as Peon with the Respondent-Market Committee, the question of illegal termination dated 25.10.1991 would not arise. These observations of the learned Judge do not call for any interference. 5) Writ Petition lacks merit, it is dismissed. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/