IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.368 of 2009 Date of decision 22.1.2009 Mohinder Kaur .....Appellant versus Jaswinder Singh and another .....Respondents Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Kannan. Present: Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. K. Kannan, J (Oral) The direction of the Appellate Court while disposing of appeal against the interim order of the trial Court that any alienation shall be done only after obtaining permission from the Court is challenged before this Court in revision. It is urged by the counsel that the property which was the subject matter of the alleged agreement has already been acquired by the Government and that the Acquisition Officer is not prepared to entertain any claim for payment of the compensation on account of the pendency of the proceedings and by virtue of the order passed by the Additional District Judge. The reasons of alleged refusal by the Acquisition Officer or the entitlement to compensation or otherwise will have to be pursued by reference to the relevant procedure prescribed under the Land Acquisition Act itself and there could be no fetter to the Acquisition Officer to pass an appropriate orders by the pendency of any case before the Civil Court. I find no error or illegality in the order passed by the Additional District Judge and the revision petition is accordingly dismissed. 22.1.2009 ( K. KANNAN ) A. Kaundal JUDGE