/^. ^Io"tf' HtGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petjtion (S) No. 423 of 2008 Petitioners 1. Yadunandan Singh Verma, S/o Shri Udai Singh Verma, Age about 40 years, Asstt. Teacher. Govt. Primary School. Rudri, Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) 2. Atul Ransingh. S/o Shri P. R. Ransingh. Age about 40 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School. Leelar, Distt. - Dhamlari (C.G.) 3. Smt. Tanuja Ghorpade. W/o Shri Santosh Rao Ghorpade, Age about 41 years, Asstt. Teacher. Govt. Boys Primary School, Gokutpur, Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) 4. Pda Ram Nishad. S/o Late Shri Rama Ram NJshad. Age about 34 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Gangrel. Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) 5. Smt. Anjaji Sharwah, S/o Late Shri Umesh Kumar Sharwah, Age aout 40 years, Asstt. Teacher. Govt. Primary School, Gangrel, Distt. -- Dhamtari (C.G.) 6. Gopal Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri Ramadhar Sahu, Age about 35 yeare, /testt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School. Borklkhurd, Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) 7. Bharat Lal Sahu. S/o Shri Bhunu Ram Sahu, Age about 48 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Boridkhurd, Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) 8. Radheshyam Netam, S/o Shri Angad Ram Netam, Age about 48 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School. Tumabujurg, Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) 9. Kundan Lal Sahu, S/o Shri Tulsi Ram Sahu. Age about 39 years. Asstt. Teacher. Govt. Middte School. Tumarabhara, Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) 10. Jitendra Kumar George, S/o Late Shri George Fassac, Age about 45 years, Asstt. Teacher. Govt. Boys Middte School, Potiyadih, Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) ^"^-, ^-^^^.^ 11. Versus Respondents 1. 2. Pankaj Rawate. S/o Late Shri Narendra Kumar Rawate, Age about 40 yeare, Asstt. Teacher. Govt. Primary School No.1, Dhamtari, Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Education & Tribal Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education OfRcer, Dhamtari (C.G.) Distt. - WRIT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTtTUTION OF INDtA Singte Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, ^. Thakur Shri Somkant Verma, Advocates for the petitioners. Shri Satish Gupta. Depufy Govt. Advocate forthe respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on this 22nd day of January, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as leamed counsel appearing for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts and question of law, involved jn the present writ petition. are the same asto that of jn Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, DWQ and another (2006 (tl) MPJR-CG 96), which has been disposed of vide order dated 3.4.2006. Accordjngly, the writ petition is aJlov/ed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwa] (supra), subject to vertficatjon of the fact asto whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.I. Examination Certificates on their own expenses. as per the drculars dated 24.12.1998 and 1.3.1999 and further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge