IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2148 of 2011 RAJESH BHARTI & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 23.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, informant and the State. The petitioners being the brothers of the deceased are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 302,328,120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that the informant being the wife of the deceased received information that her husband was assaulted and thereafter he was poisoned by them. There is general allegation against the entire family. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the petitioners’ side tried to grab the share of the informant’s side hence the victim was killed. The post mortem report does not corroborate the accusation levelled in the F.I.R. Though it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that 2 during investigation it has come that the victim died due to poisoning. Considering the fact that there is general accusation against the entire family members including the petitioners and the fact that the accusation was also not being corroborated by the post mortem report, let the petitioners, Rajesh Bharti, Ramesh Bharti, Arun Bharti @ Arun Kumar Bharti and Sijay Giri @ Sijay Bharti, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Kasma P.S. Case No.12 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Aurangabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)