- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.2549 OF 2001 Mr.R.V.More for the Petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Parab i/b Mr.D.S.Sawant for Respondent No.1. ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. ¦ DATED: 13TH APRIL,2005 P.C.: The Petitioner by this petition challenges the order passed by the State Government dated 7th February, 2000 refusing to entertain the revision application filed by the Petitioner under the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation & Consolidation of Holdings Act on the ground that the matter is sub-judice before the Civil Court. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that this observation is not correct. The civil suit filed by - 2 - the Petitioner is for simplicity injunction, but the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner is not in a position to point out to me the nature of the suit. Copy of the plaint is neither annexed to the petition nor the copy of the plaint is produced before me. As the Petitioner has not made out a prima facie case, petition cannot be entertained. It is rejected. ...