IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4054 of 2010 BELTRON TELECOMMUNICATION LTD. 5th floor, Block-A, Maurya Lok Complex, Patna -800001 through its Managing Director. Versus 1. THE Union Of India Through The Secretary, Department of Telecommunication, Govt. of India, New Delhi . 2. The Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited through the Principal General Manager, Telecom District Patna, Telephone Bhawan, Patna. 3. The Principal General Manager, Telecom District Patna, Telephone Bhawan, Patna 4. The General Manager-Development, Telecom District Patna, Telephone Bhawan, Patna. 5. The Deputy General Manager-Finance, Telecom District, Patna Respondents ----------- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Arun Kumar Srivastava, Advocate For the B.S.N.L. :- Mr. J.P. Karn, Sr. Advocate Mrs. Parul Ranjan, Advocate 3/- 21.01.2011 The present M.J.C has been filed against the non-compliance of the order dated 21.07.2008 passed by a Division Bench of this Court In L.P.A. No. 487 of 2008. The said order has recorded the submission made by the respondent for withdrawing Communication dated 7/15.11.2007. The said Communication was addressed to the petitioner herein requesting him to bring down the rates for repairing wok so that the payment may be released. Subsequent to such withdrawal a letter has been sent to the petitioner on 17.11.2008, requesting him to nominate a member from his side to settle the dispute amicably. The claim of the petitioner is with reference to 2 non-payment of bill of Rs. 9,78,900/- which also remained unpaid till today by the respondents herein. But however, in view of the fact that the letter dated 15.11.2007 has been withdrawn and the subsequent correspondence to show that the department also wanted to settle the issue amicably, for requesting the petitioner to nominate a member from his side to settle the issue at the earliest. Learned Standing counsel for the B.S.N.L. submitted that the Department requires four weeks’ time to settle the issue amicably, accordingly, the same it would suffice, if a direction is issued to the petitioner to nominate a member so that both the parties can settle the issue amicably with reference to the correspondence entered between the parties. It is also made clear that if the petitioner is aggrieved by any of the order he would agitate his right before the appropriate forum. With the above said observation this M.J.C. is disposed of. Ashwini/Ranjan (T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Gopal Prasad, J.) 3