WPMS No. 635/2005 M.C.C. No. 136/2010 CLMA No. 1639/2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala J. Mr. R.C.Upadhyay, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Chauhan, the learned counsel for the opposite party. The delay in filing the restoration application has been sufficiently explained. Therefore, the delay condonation application No. 1639/2010 is allowed and the delay in filing the restoration application is condoned. Also heard on the Restoration Application No. 136/2010. Cause shown in the restoration application is sufficient. The restoration application is allowed. The order dated 13.11.2007 is recalled and the petition is hereby restored in its original number. Inspite of time being granted, no counter affidavit has been filed. The petitioner was given a contract from the respondents. It is alleged that he had carried out the work within the stipulated period and that he submitted the bills for payment, but full payment has not been paid till date. Considering the facts and circumstances that has been brought on record, I dispose of the writ petition with the direction to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for payment of the balance amount alongwith necessary details before the authority concerned. If such an application is moved, the authority concerned will decide the matter expeditiously. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated: 22.3.2010 Nishant