IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.940 of 2009 Date of decision: 20.2.2009 Smt. Naranjan Kaur and another ......Petitioners Versus Parmod Kumar ......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Surinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. * * * Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. This is defendants' revision petition challenging the order dated 9.1.2009 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar whereby application under Order 6 rule 17 CPC filed by the plaintiff- respondent for amendment of the suit from that of permanent injunction into one for mandatory injunction, has been allowed. Learned counsel for the petitioners has vehemently argued that the factum of construction of alleged parapet was already within the knowledge of the plaintiff-respondent and therefore, he could not amend the suit by way of amendment application. The contention of the petitioners is misconceived. Admittedly, the suit is at the preliminary stage and the issues have not been framed. In view of the this, there is no error in the impugned order. Dismissed. February 20, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE