IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 295 OF 2008 Shri Shabbir Ali Mohammad Sabuwala ...Petitioner. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Harshad Inamdar i/by M.S.Karnik, advs. For the Petitioner. Mr.A.I.I.Patel, AGP For the Respondent No.1. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : APRIL 22, 2010 P.C. 1 The learned counsel for the respondents points out that the award was passed on 14.6.2000 and the possession of the land was also taken as per the said award. Even though in the order dated 8th February, 2008 in the Writ Petition St. No.3439/08, it was recorded that statement was made by the learned AGP that the possession had already been taken, on 8th February, 2008 this Court only directed not to take any further steps till the next date. The learned AGP points out that even in the contempt petition, there is no mention that any steps were taken after 8th February, 2008 and thus, there is no breach of the order of this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner could not point anything about the breach of the said order. Therefore, I find that no contempt of this Court has been committed. - 2 - 2 Therefore, the contempt petition stands dismissed. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)