-:1:- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 893 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 893 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 893 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1113 OF 2006 APPEAL NO. 1113 OF 2006 APPEAL NO. 1113 OF 2006 Mr. Nandkumar Pandurang Ghadge. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Mr. Nandkumar Pandurang Ghadge, Applicant present in-person. Mrs. A.A. Mane, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. DATE DATE DATE : 05TH AUGUST, 2008. : 05TH AUGUST, 2008. : 05TH AUGUST, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . This is an application in-person by the Appellant/Accused who is enjoying parole. By present application he has requested to allow him to argue the case himself. He does not want to take assistance of his earlier Counsel Mr. Nitin Sejpal or he does not want the Advocate from Government Legal Services. According to the Accused/Appellant he is M.Sc. and he was in service at Bhabha Automic Research Centre, Trombay at the material time. He submits that he will be in a better position to give justice to his case as the matter revolves on technical aspect of handling computer. He reiterates that he has to argue his case in English and if permitted, in-between, in Marathi. -:2:- 2. I have repeatedly asked the Accused/Appellant considering the gravity of the matter to reconsider all his prayer. However, after 3 or 4 days persistent visits to this Court, the Applicant/Accused is bent upon to pursue his contention to argue the matter himself. 3. Hence, Mr. Nitin Sejpal is discharged. The Accused/Appellant is allowed to argue the matter himself at his risk. 4. Stand over for hearing the matter to 11th August 2008. 5. Application is allowed. (K.U. (K.U. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.)