IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO: 672 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 09/01/2004 in WP NO. 623 of 2004 on the file of the High Court.) Between: M/s. Gopala Krishna Rice Mill, Rep. By its Proprietor Sri Sangisetty Siva Nageswara Rao & Anr. ..... APPELLANTS AND The District Collector, Krishna at Machilipatnam and others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : ORAL JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) On 24.11.2009, the learned counsel for the appellants was called absent hence, the appeal was directed to be listed on 25.11.2009, on which date also, the learned counsel for the appellants remained absent. Therefore, the appeal directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal on 26.11.2009. Even today, when the appeal is listed under the caption of for dismissal, neither learned counsel for the appellants is present nor there is any representation on his behalf. Consequently, the Writ Appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to cost. ____________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari __________________ Justice Sanjay Kumar November 26, 2009 MAS.