IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 669 of 2008 Between: Jakkula Sathaiah, s/o. Late Jangaiah, R/o. Kasaram Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of A.P., Rep by Principal Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionarate, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 3 Mr. Ramchandrudu, Station House Officer, Shamshabad Police Station Officer, Shamshabad Police Station, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in interfering in the civil dispute pertaining to agricultural land comprised in Survey Nos.91, 92, 93 and 95 admeasuring Ac.9.23 guntas, Ac.8.16 guntas, Ac.12.38 guntas and Ac.7.13 guntas respectively of Kecharam Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and perused the record. A perusal of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition shows that civil disputes are in existence between the petitioner and his other family members and respondent No.3 is allegedly interfering in the said disputes by bringing pressure on the petitioner to give up his rights over the above mentioned properties. The Inspector of Police, Shamshabad Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District filed a counter affidavit, in which, it is stated that on the complaint filed by Mr.Erragolla Sathaiah @ J.Sathaiah (the petitioner), a case was registered against respondent Nos.4, 5 and some others vide Crime No.266 of 2007 under Sections 420 and 427 IPC on 11.08.2007, charge sheet was filed, it was taken cognizance vide C.C.No.649 of 2007 by the concerned Magistrate and is posted to 01.05.2008 and that on the private complaint given by respondent No.4 before the learned VIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar against the petitioner and others, which was forwarded by the learned Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., Crime No.13 of 2008 under Sections 447, 435, 454 and 506 IPC was registered on 09.01.2008 and investigation was taken up. It is further alleged that the investigation prima facie revealed that the offence against the petitioner and others is not yet established and investigation is still pending. While denying any interference in the civil disputes, respondent No.3 undertook to complete the investigation into Crime No.13 of 2008 expeditiously and file appropriate report/charge sheet before the jurisdictional Magistrate. Inasmuch as respondent No.3 categorically denied his interference in civil disputes except to the extent of registering the crimes and investigating into the same, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition as infructuous. Ordered accordingly. As a sequel to disposal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.776 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 22nd APRIL, 2008 kvni