11b. cr appa 743­10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 743 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 434 OF 2010 Daulatrao Nanaso Pisal .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. Dhaval A. Patil i/b Mr. S.P. Thorat for the Applicant Ms. M.M. Deshmukh, APP for the State CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J DATE : 7th SEPTEMBER, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant-original accused has been convicted under Sections 323 and 352 of IPC. The appeal preferred by him against the said conviction has been admitted. The applicant is now seeking bail. 3. Learned advocate for the applicant stated that besides this case, the applicant has a clean record. He further stated that the applicant was on bail during the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. Both these statements have not been controverted by learned 1 11b. cr appa 743­10.doc APP. Moreover, it is seen that the maximum sentence is only for three months and the appeal is not likely to come up for hearing in the near future. Thus, looking to the above facts, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. Hence, the order: O R D E R 1. Applicant Daulatrao Nanaso Pisal be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- [Rs. Fifteen Thousand Only] with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The Applicant shall report to the Bhuinj Police Station once in three months till disposal of the appeal. 2. Application is allowed in above terms. [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 2 11b. cr appa 743­10.doc 3