1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.64 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.1051 OF 1999 Ms.Namta V. Adnani ....Plaintiff V/s. Manish J. Adnani & Ors. ....Defendants Mr.Ashok M. Saraogi for the Plaintiff. Mr.Y.Sakhare i/b M/s.YKS Legal for Defendant No.3. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 26TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- 1. This is the Plaintiff’s Chamber Summons to amend the plaint. 2. The plaint as filed merely sought a declaration that the consent terms between the Plaintiff’s mother and her late father are not binding upon her and that the Plaintiff had not given up her right, title and interest in the estate of her deceased father. 3. By this amendment, the Plaintiff seeks a declaration as to her alleged 1/4th share in the estate of her deceased father and for consequential reliefs. 4. There is no inconsistent cause of action. The reliefs claim would be the consequence of a declaration in the suit, as filed. Whether the claim is well founded or not is the subject matter pertaining to the merits of the rival contentions which are not relevant at this stage. Needless to add 2 that all the contentions of the parties in this regard including as to the question of jurisdiction, are kept open. 5. In the circumstances, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer (a). The amendment is subject to limitation. The amendment shall be carried out within six weeks from today. 6. The Chamber Summons is accordingly disposed of.