N THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) ' RIT PETITION (5),,No. 4/0LI3 OF 201a PETITIONFR Govindram Komiya, S/o Late Shri Sundersingh Komiya, aged about 66 years, Retired Lecturer, R/o Mararpara Balod, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS ESPONDENTS : /' 1. R State of Chhatt:isgarh: Through: the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Accountant General, Chhattisgarh, Raipur. District Education Officer, Durg (C.G.) Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, Balod, District Durg (C.G.) " RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA‘ I W @ wt 200 ‘mm (W) mmm mm WW 'am'mm SB Hon’ble Shn Mamndra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 02-08-2010 Shri P. P. Sahu, counsel for the‘ Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel No.1, 3 & 4 0n advance copy. Shri S. S. Rajput, Standing oounset for respondent No.2 on advance copy. Thjs case pertains to grieva ce ofnon-grant of retirai dues. Learned counsei appearing for the pe tioner, on instructions, submits that the matter may be referred to the Retir i Dues Committee. petitioner. awyer for the State/respondents This Court, in the matter of .P.No.4642l2004 (Baijnath Manda! Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh 8. 0th rs). and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the atter of retriai dues as the disputed question of facts were invoived. The ommittee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the er dated 19-06-2006 passed in W.P.No.1961l2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Ch ndrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), and order ated 13-3-2008 passedin M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh nd others Vs. Baiinath Manda! and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 315' January, 2008 passed in .P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandai (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. This petition is accordingly dis osed of in the same terms i.e., tries rected to send the case to the office of the Advocate General is Committee, within a period of 15 days om the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee s all issue notice to the petitioner and officers concerned within a further peri d of 15 days. The Committee shali d i gnaw M7- rknmw @ \N?Q§'JW(WLf3/&o ' 1E 200 3a W, WW, W3; Wm mm (Wm mwm KL, consider and pass order, in accord opponunity of hearing to the petitk concerned may me additiona! documé including payment of retirai dues, if within a period of four months from order. The petitioner shali suppiy c State counsel as weii as counsei fort the eame to the Committee. in case of grievance with r dues, it is not necessary to tiie a writ representationlappiication can be Committee, as stated above. The Re to entertain the representation/appiicqtion, if so filed directly. Sd/— 7’ ra Mohan Shrivastava Judge WWW WWW WW WW éwffanm ance with iaw, after affording proper iner. The petitioner and the officers ants, if necessary, The entire exercise, any, to the petitioner, be completed the date of receipt of a copy of this Tumane ne complete set of the petition to the we Accountant General for transferring egard to non-payment of pensionary petition before this Court directly. The moved before the Retirai Dues tiral Dues Committee shall not refuse El i g Manind ii R