IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 21338 of 2001 Between: 1 N. Balakrishna S/o Late Vasudeva Rao TRT Quarter No.13, Ground Floor, Industrial Housing Colony, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad. 2 A. Subba Raju S/o Late Subba Raju TRT Quarter No.25, Ground Floor, Industrial Housing Colony, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad. 3 G.V. Subba Raju S/o G. Ramamkrishna Raju TRT Quarter No.28, Ground Floor, Industrial Housing Colony, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad. 4 P. Gopala Krishna Raju S/o Late P. Venkata Raju TRT Quarter No.16, Ground Floor, Industrial Housing Colony, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad. 5 Shaik Mahmood S/o Late Shaik Mahaboob TRT Quarter No.12, Ground Floor, Industrial Housing Colony, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Labour, Employment, Training & Factories (LAB-III) Departmen Secretaritat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner & Inspector General of Registration and Stamps, Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Labour, Tanguturi Anjaiah Bhavan, RTC 'X' Roads, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad. 4 The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad. 5 The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad Tank Bund, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ order or directions, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in not registering the TRT Quarter Nos. 13, 25, 28, 16 and 12 in favour of the petitioners by collecting the cost discriminatory, arbitrary and illegal and consequentially direct the Respondent No. 3 to register the TRT Quarter Nos. 13, 25, 28, 16 and 12 in favour of the petitioner by collecting the cost of the excess land as stipulated in G.O.Ms.No.67 dated 28-11-2000 by the 1st Respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.NARENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN Writ Petition No.21338 of 2001 ORDER: Sri M.Srikanth Reddy, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri M.Narender Reddy, Learned Counsel for the Petitioners, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. __________ 6-11-2008 asp