IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43413 of 2009 AFTAB ALAM Versus 1. The STATE OF BIHAR 2. Nujhat Nigar ----------- 5/ 26.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. There is allegation of torture for non- fulfillment of demand of dowry which is denied on the ground that differences are matrimonial and complainant is residing with her parents’ family deserting this petitioner and to justify her desertion, this allegation is levelled may never justify refusal of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 1440 of 2009, Trial No. 3702 of 2009 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Siwan subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)