IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10140 of 2005 Jitendra Kumar Singh, S/o Late Jayram Singh, village – Pran Bigha, P.S. – Hulasganj, District – Jehanabad ………………. Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. Secretary, Bridge Construction Corporation, Patna 3. District Magistrate, District – Jehanabad (Bihar) …………….. Respondents ---------------------------------- 02. 09.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The writ petition has been filed for a direction upon the respondents to appoint him in the Bridge Construction Corporation or anywhere under the State Government on the ground that his family is starving due to the reason that from the river from which he earned his livelihood has been connected by bridge and this petitioner who was running his boat in the river is left unemployed. This Court can only express its sympathy for the position in which the petitioner is, but cannot do much in the matter. The petitioner has not shown any right or the violation of any statute or policy of the Government, which would enable this Court to interfere in the matter and pass any order in favour of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been moving before the authorities, but nothing has come out of the same. Be that as it may, the writ petitioner is at liberty to 2 pursue his remedies before the authorities concerned. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed off. SKM (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)