^^M" ^y"- •^^ ,^^ '<- \£f^ ^yv. '^-""" • 'T ^" INTHE HIGH_CQJJRT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTIS ?H AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No. h 1_2Q06. A^.uodla.nt DefendantNo. Versus 'Sanjay Agrawal Aged about 39 years S/o Shri R.S.AgrawaI, Partaer M/s Agrawal Consultant and Engineers, 2/5 Nehru Nagar, Bhilai, Dist : DuTg-(C.G,j Respondent No, 1 intiff Resuoiulent Nu.2 lyefendant No.2 M/s Nawkar Construction Partnership Firiu, through - Partncr -fnderchand Dhariwal, R/o 45/4, iadar Bazar, RaipuT-iC.G.) FLli.ci.y^. Alok Kumar, Proprietor Alok Bhandar, Shop No.26, Nawkar Bhawan, Choubey Colony, Swami Atmanaiid Ward, Raipur-fC.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATIQN OF- THE APPEAL.N0180/2006 DISMISSED IN DEFAULT ON 12~06.2006. XI-HC-78 'SSSf yilillcf'4, ®Tl1wis,faciray sn^r^rR-ii't) ((aiTSTRWgi^R' ijn-.c.c . t^. S *41Nrtl sb*iicn 'x g^ 200^ 3< 1^1 MslSR ('ilt^s.a') ^cnwgfecrsn^i 20.6.2006 *i'iifd41-i tii*<<riTftTs'<rl <Rit^i<. ^i3R^T3I1^T Shri Ktehore Bhaduri, None for respondents. Learaed counscl foil |;ounsel for applicaat. fhe applicant submits that on 12.6. %)06, the appeal has l]een dismissed for non-appearance of appellant. He further subn^its that on that day, both the parties were absent, therefore, this daatter cau be heard without notice to respondents aud cau be de^ heard and decided. Considered. Prayer aU(| Heard. l^king iiito account application duly supported wj ;ided. He prays fhat the matter be wed. the groiinds inentioned ia fhe |th an affidavit, I ani satisfied with the fact that fhere is sufi5cient| @-ouud fi>r non-appearance of the appellant on 12.6.2006 wh^n ftie appeal was calted out for hearing. AppUcation is atlowed. First Appeal No. 100/2(] A copy of fhe order be kept in Acconlingly, M.C.C. No. 106 is rcstored to its or^inal nuinber. fhe records offhe First Appeal. 1318/2006 stands dfaposed of. Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge