CW 4959/08 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.4959/2008 Manju Kumari Versus State & (3) Ors. Date of Order ::: 28/05/08 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Jitendra S. Tanwar, for petitioner Instant petition has been filed seeking direction of this Court to terminate services of applicants whose names though are included in prayer clause but have not been impleaded as party respondents. From the record, it appears that at one stage, in course of meeting of Gram Sabha Gothara Panchayat Samiti, Dausa held on 20/08/07, three applicants were selected for different posts but one Rashmi Upadhaya challenged selection of one of applicants (Santosh Devi) before Additional Collector, Dausa, who accepted her grievance and selection of Santosh Devi was set aside and according to petitioner, at a later stage, Zila Parishad Dausa vide letter dt.26/03/08 (Ann.7) conveyed decision of Gram Sabha taken in its meeting dt.10/03/08 for having cancelled the selections made earlier in meeting dt.20/08/07. Counsel submits that since those applicants are still working despite their selection being cancelled, the authorities be directed to terminate their services and hold CW 4959/08 //2// selections afresh. Submission made by Counsel is without substance. Once selections made have been set aside and if not given effect to, petitioner is free to make complaint to the competent authority and no interference is called for in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction U/Art.226 of the Constitution. Consequently, writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p.2/4959CW08-2805.doc