IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6183 of 2011 Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03/ 19.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioner is the main assailant in a case which had occurred on 22.3.2006 and it has specifically been stated that he opened fire from rifle which caused fire arms injury on the chest of the informant’s son namely, Sagar Yadav as a result of which he died then and there. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that, as a matter of fact, childish quarrel took place and in the aforesaid quarrel persons from both sides sustained injuries It is further contended by her that if the prosecution story assumed to be true, then also, first information report demonstrates that there was no intention of the petitioner to commit murder of any person and that was the reason it was not stated in the first information report as to whom petitioner aimed to kill. It is further pointed out by her that in the aforesaid occurrence one Tuntun Yadav sustained injury on his head and now he has become paralytic. It is also pointed out by her that wife of the aforesaid Tuntun Yadav lodged Harnaut P.S. Case no. 75/2006 against the prosecution party. Taking into consideration the above stated submissions as well as materials available on the case diary, particularly, keeping in mind the allegation levelled against the petitioner, I do not feel it proper to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for 2 bail in connection with Harnaut P.S. case no.45/2006 pending in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda stands rejected. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)