1 sj202.10.sxw ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 202 OF 2010 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3492 OF 2007 UCO Bank ......Plaintiffs. Vs. Vishwanath Singha ......Defendant. Ms. M.R. Patel for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendant. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE :- 11/11/2011. P.C.:- In a summary Suit the Plaintiffs- bank has claimed the balance amount of Rs.1,23,563/- with agreed interest @ 13.5 p.a. Though served, the Defendant did not file any reply to the Summons for Judgment. The averments made in the plaint and the documents so annexed remained uncontroverted. The transaction, therefore, so referred and the documents which are duly signed by the Defendant show that the plaintiff has made out the case for Summons for Judgment, as prayed. 2 There are clear admission/ acknowledgment supported by the 2 sj202.10.sxw ssm documents on record which are duly signed by the Defendant and the same remained uncontroverted and also justified to grant the Summons for Judgment so claimed. 3 The Plaintiffs have also shown the original documents which is taken note of. Therefore, as there is no defence and no case made out by the Defendant, the Summons for Judgment is disposed of as prayed. 4 In the result, the Summons for Judgment as well as Suit are disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)