IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD DATED: THIS the 30th day of April, 2011 PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRL.P.No. 3744 of 2011 Between: Nallabothula Chinna Rangaswamy And others ..Petitioners and The State of AP and another Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRL.P.No. 3744 of 2011 Order: This petition is filed under section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the criminal case - C.C.No. 1142 of 2010 on the file of the court of XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, L.B.Nagar. Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are stated to be the police officers, themselves, and the third petitioner is stated to be in private service and associated with petitioner Nos. 1 and 2. The offences alleged in the case are those punishable under sections 363, 506 read with 109 IPC. The allegations in the charge sheet show that the first petitioner was already involved in a criminal case and he abducted the present victim girl to prevent her from deposing against him in that criminal case. 3. It is not necessary to go into other details. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners invited my attention to various documents, including certain statements to show that the whole case is highly improbable. All these contentions are within the realm of disputed questions of fact, which have to be decided only on evidence. The allegations in the FIR do disclose the offences and this is not a case, where the allegations even if believed to be true, do not disclose any offence. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioners in support of his contention placed reliance on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in All Cargo Movers (India Private Limited v. Dhanesh Badarmal Jain[1]. It is a case pertaining to offence punishable under sections 406 and 420 IPC i.e., criminal breach of trust and cheating. It may be noted that in a prosecution relating to cheating or criminal breach of trust the documents may probablise the case of the accused that the matter is of a civil nature. That is not the situation here. In the present case the offences are those punishable under section 363 and 506 IPC relating to kidnapping of a minor girl. In these circumstances, I regret that I am unable to agree with the contention of the petitioner’s counsel that the case can be quashed on the principle laid down in the above decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. 6 Accordingly for the aforesaid reasons this petition is dismissed. _____________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J. Dated:30—04—2011. *BVS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRL.P.No. 3744 of 2011 Dated:30—04—2011. [1] 2007 (14) SCC 776