1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 2103 of 2011 [Dr. Rajkumar Sadashiv Chavan Vs. State of Maharashtra & others] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. A. P. Kalmegh, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. Parihar, AGP for respondents. ----- CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE : 07th September, 2011. Learned AGP Mr. Parihar is seeking time to file reply, and states that one of the grievances of the petitioner is that his representation dated 18th January, 2011 has not been decided so far. He contends that if the representation is not already decided, the same can be directed to be decided within a reasonable time. Learned Adv. Mr. Kalmegh appearing for the petitioner states that for the present the grievances of petitioner will be satisfied if that representation is directed to be decided in a time bound manner. 2 In this situation, we direct the respondent no.1 to take appropriate decision on that representation, if it is not decided so far, within a period of three months from today. If necessary, opportunity of hearing shall also be extended to the petitioner while taking that decision. With liberty to the petitioner to approach again if cause of action arises, and keeping all his contentions open , petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. Judge Judge |Hedau|