IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14106 of 2008 Between: 1 Maraboyena Raju Yadav S/o.Rajaram R/o.H.No.1-3/1/1,Kondapur village Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 2 Verath Ananad S/o.Satyanarayana R/o.H.No.15-49,Siddiq Nagar Gachi Bowli, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District 3 Thalari Narasimha S/o.Balaiah R/o.H.No.114/136,Anjaiah Nagar Gachi Bowli, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District 4 Smt.K.Shobha Rani W/o.Yadaiah R/o.H.No.46, Telicon Nagar, Gachi Bowli, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District 5 G.Gal Reddy S/o.Venkat Reddy R/o.H.No.103, Siddiq Nagar Gachi Bowli, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector,Ranga Reddy District at Lakdikapul Hyderabad 2 The Tahsildar,Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 3 The Municipal Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District,Hyderabad 4 The Circle Inspector of Police,Rayadurgam Police Station, Ranga Reddy District 5 The Managing Director, M/s.Ramki Infrastructure Pvt Ltd., Raj Bhavan Road,Opp:Subbi Ramireddy office Somajiguda, Hyderabad 6 The Managing Director, M/s.Vasantrha Constructions C/o.Site Office situated in Sy.No.135, Gachibowli village,Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents No. 1 to 5 without taking any action against the respondents No.5 and 6 for their illegal, blastings which cause sound pollution and damage to the petitioners houses is as illegal, arbitrary, and against the principles of natural justice in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.KILARUKHADER BABA Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following : ORDER: No representation on behalf of the petitioners. It indicates that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution at the admission stage. No costs. ________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:31st October, 2008. cs ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RLD}