IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32400 of 2010 RAJESH PUNISIA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 4.3.2010 in a case registered under Sections 302 and 120B /34 of the Indian Penal Code. The F.I.R. was lodged against Madan Yadav and Sarswati Devi. It is specifically alleged that Madan Yadav used to give threatening to the deceased. Subsequently, during investigation Madan Yadav made a confession that this petitioner had committing offence for Rs. 5,000/-. Considering the fact that there was specific allegation against Madan Yadav in the F.I.R. whereas petitioner’s name sprang up in the confessional statement of Madan Yadav, let the petitioner namely, Rajesh Punisia be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II, Supaul in connection with S. Tr. No. 93 of 2010 arising out of Partapganj P.S. Case No. 19 of 2008. 2 Since, the petitioner is an accused in one other case, learned Court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner if he fails to appear on three consecutive dates or gets involved in similar nature of offence. Anand Kr. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)