1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 3910 OF 2002 Mr.Shahabuddin U. Virani. ..Plaintiff. V/s. M/s Avdesh Corpn. & Anr. ..Defendants. Mr.Rajiv Narula i/b M/s.J.,Narula & Assoc. for Plaintiff. Mr.Bharat Mehta for defendant No.2 Defendant No.2 and 5 present. Mr.B. Trilokani for Defendant No.3, 4, 7 and 8. Mr.S.M.Khaire for defendant No.5 and 6. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : AUGUST 17, 2005. DATE : AUGUST 17, 2005. DATE : AUGUST 17, 2005. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Counsel for the parties states that parties have amicably settled the matter out of the court. The terms of settlement have been reduced into writing in the form of Consent Terms, which are duly signed by the parties and their advocates dated 17th August, 2005, which is tendered across the bar, taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The plaintiffs as well as defendant No.2 and 5 are present in the court, who are also signatory to the Consent Terms. Undertaking given in clause-6(a) of the consent terms is accepted. Suit is decreed in 2 terms of Consent Terms. Refund as per rule.