1. We; W 2. 11: faxTm, W W 3. gray mm W WGm) 4. aWfégwwWwfW ($31.) 5. W 13W 13‘ W fafrw W W m 31W W WW (Em) W 31W 311%? —226 227 WW: W HIGH COURTQF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR \ WRIT PETITION NO.101 OF 2001 PETITIONERS Smt. Sushma Tamrakar RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Versus $ingie Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K: Agnihotri, J. Present :— None for the petitioner Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, Advocate for the respondent No.4. ORDER (Passed on this 28” day of September, 201 1) The matter is cailed for hearing twice None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioners. The petitioners may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. In view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. P“ Sdl- l Satish K. Agnihotri I Judge r v J