IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20832 of 2009 MUKESH PASWAN @ MUKHO @ MUKHWA PASWAN, SON OF BUDHAN PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SALEMPUR, P.S. AMARPUR, DISTRICT-BANKA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.10.2009 Heard. This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that that the petitioner was on bail but he absented before the trial court as a result of which his bail bond was cancelled on 26.6.2004 and on 2.7.2007 he was declared absconder and permanent warrant was issued against him. Further submission is that the petitioner has been arrested on 19.3.2009 and since then he is in custody. The learned counsel says that the petitioner has remained in custody for a period exceeding seven months and thus he has been sufficiently penalized for his absence before the trial court. It is also submitted that charges have already been framed against the petitioner. The learned counsel says that he undertakes on behalf of the petitioner that in future the petitioner will remain regular in his appearance before the trial court. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Mukesh Paswan @ Mukho @ Mukhwa Paswan is admitted to bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount - 2 - each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No.2, Banka, in Sessions Trial No. 140 of 2004, Tr. No. 569 of 2009, arising out of Amarpur P.S. Case No. 119 of 2002. (C.M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-