HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR “Irit Petition (S) No. 3213 9f 2893 PgTlTIQNER Dr. Satish Kumar Agrawal, S/o Shn‘ Ramavtar Agrawal, agec‘; about 49 years, Posted as Professor (Commeme) at Thakur Chhedilal Post Graduate Govememm College, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. VERgUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhatiisga‘i‘, ‘ 11‘64gh the Secretauy, Dépaunem 0f Higher EdJcatiQH DKS Bhavaa Mantaalaya, Raipm', Chhattisggu‘h. Commisgionsr, Depaxtment 0f Highm‘ Education, IQ Science Callege Palisar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Additional Dix'ector {T), Diracterate of Higher Education, Science Coliage Parisai‘, Raipur, c1 Santesh Kumar Agrawal, Iii-charge Pi'inci al, Thakur Clihediial Post Gfaduaite Gevemment Caliege, Ian-“if nistz‘ict Iaizjgiy Chaimia, Chiiattiwarh. (VJRIT PF. i l l ION UNDER ARTICLE 22g OF THE CONSTH‘I TTION OF INDIA} g? Agnihen‘L .3.) P L f : Shi'iSailjayKumajAgrawal Ariveaate faith-e patitianer. Shri Y.S. '1“haku£ Deputy Advocate Generai for tha State. “Hr Ago- 3QPI‘I a, . -W. QRAL QRDER (Passea on this 26m aay at June, 2668) Leai‘ned eouusel appeaiing' f0: the petitioner wbmits that the petitiotter dees iiet want ta contest the mattet‘ on merit at this stage. However, the petitioner prays that his representation dated 01.05.2008 (Annexui‘e P/13) be considered and decided in accordance with law expeditiously, to which teamed counsel appeariiig for the State has no objection. \ , n K Shri Y.S‘ Thakm‘, Ieamed caumeE appearing 153? the State, submits that there is n0 reasdn Elsie why the reg'asentation of the petitioner dated 01.05.2008 (Annexm'e 13/13) should not be decided expeditiously. In View of the foregoing, this petition is diSposed of with a direction to the authmity concerned to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 01.0-2008 {Annexm‘e Pl?“ in accordance with low, as early as possible, prefemb!y within a period of four weeks noin the date of receipt of a copy ofthis Oiden _ -91, Sd/_ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge