IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.18658 of 2007 Date of Decision:06.01.2011 Mandeep Singh ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR. Present: Mr.Bikram Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Kirti Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 8. Mr.Gurminder Singh, Advocate, for Mr.Manpreet Singh Longia, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Mr.Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for respondent Nos.5 to 7. **** M EHINDER S INGH S ULLAR , J.(oral) At the very outset, learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 8, on the instructions of Sh.R.P.Makkar, Assistant Director, Elections, has stated at the bar that as the petitioner has been exonerated in the second enquiry, therefore, the instant writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the categoric stand of the State Authorities that the petitioner has already been exonerated in the indicated enquiry, learned counsel for the petitioner intends to withdraw the writ petition as having become infructuous. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as such. January 06, 2011 (MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR) seema JUDGE