1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3102 OF 2011. Sau. Sulochana W/o Ashok Nagarikar. .Vrs. State of Maharashtra, thr. its Secretary Women and Child Development Department,Mantralaya, Mumbai and Others. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D.KODE, J J. DATED : 06 th July, 2011 Heard, learned Counsel for parties. In view of the orders being passed, learned Counsel for petitioner seeks leave to delete respondent No.5. Hence, leave granted. Learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 4 points out that petitioner has already made a representation to respondent No.3 Chief Executive Officer and same will be decided in accordance with law. He seeks time of four weeks' to take appropriate decision in this regard. 2 Learned Counsel for petitioner points out the complaint has been made on 10th June, 2011. Looking to the nature of controversy and the fact that complaint is already made by petitioner on 10th June, 2011, we direct, Chief Executive Officer to decide the representation, as early as possible, in any case within a period of two weeks' from the date of communication of this order to him after hearing petitioner and respondent No.5 (if necessary) in accordance with law. With this directions and with clarification that this Court has not considered the controversy on merits, writ petition is disposed of. Copy of this order be supplied to the parties, to act upon. JUDGE JUDGE scd//