1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.92/2009. (Jaishree w/o Vilas Taide Vs. Vilas s/o Pandharinath Taide & Anr.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Hemant Surve, Advocate for Petitioner; Mr.MC Ghode, Adv. for Respondent No.1; Mr.VD Godbharle, APP for State. ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 7 th September, 2009. ... 1) Heard both learned Counsel. 2) The controversy revolves to a purported letter addressed by the wife (Copy annexed with the Affidavit in reply by husband Vilas). 3) Mr.Surve has a grievance that this letter could not be read by the learned Judge of the Family Court, as it is not legally proved. He adds, asking the wife to join the husband at this stage is a betrayal, as the husband has illegally performed second marriage and he is blessed with a child. These allegations are denied by the counsel for husband. 4) During the course of submission, as prayed by both the Counsel, the matter 2 needs to be remitted as both the parties independently want to place adequate evidence against each other. 5) Consequently, the matter is remitted to the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Aurangabad to decide the Petition No.E-19/2007 afresh. This follows that the order dated 21.4.2008 shall not be operating and it is set aside. 6) The parties to appear before the Family Court, Aurangabad on 5th of October, 2009. 7) With these observations, the revision is disposed of. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/crrv92.09