IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 11TH MARCH 2010 / 20TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 7978 of 2010(V) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. VIJI, AGED 40 YEARS, W/O.THILAKAN THOTTIPARAMBIL HOUSE ,CHERUVATHERY PALISSERY VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. T.V.CHANDRAN, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.VELAYUDHAN,THOTTIPARAMBIL HOUSE,CHERUVATHERY , PALISSERY VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.BINOY RAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. TOWER VISION INDIA (P) LIMITED MUSCAT TOWERS, IST FLOOR, S.A. ROAD,KADAVANTHRA. 2. AVINISSERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH AVINISSERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT REP BY SECRETARY, AVINISSERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH AVINISSERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. SINDHU, W/O.SUNILAN CHOVOORVALAPPIL HOUSE, CHERUVATHERY PALISSERY VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. SC FOR R1 SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.R. DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.7978 OF 2010 (V) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T Challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P9, an interim order passed by the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions in I.A.No.141/2010 in Appeal No.114/2010. Ext.P9, being an interim order pending further consideration of the appeal filed by the first respondent, I do not think that this court should examine the validity of the said order. If the petitioners are aggrieved by this order, it is for the petitioners to get themselves impleaded as parties to the appeals and seek variation of the said order before the Tribunal. Having regard to the above, I do not find any merit in the writ petition. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :