-^J cf \^ IN THE HIGH COIiRT OF JUBICATURE AT BILASpBR (G,G.) ^Q 'r PETITI©NJER RESPGNDENTS Ac.^ ^••w ^' ;<-:^>:>' ^^y ^' X" ^;y . .<•' y Writ Petltion N@. ^83 /2004. < Rajesh Kiimar PaBdife s/©Shri M^L^Pan^it aged abo^t 44 years, Gaoiapation - Ra^ge Offieer (iB-charge FlyiM@ Sq[ta.a<d) CoP^ Circle, Raipur (C<Q.). ¥er s^ s : !• State of Chhattisgarh Throiagh s seoretary Forest D©p@tt, ©.K.S*Bhawan, Raipar (C.G.). 2^ Principal^ Ghiei eonservator ©f Blor©st,Ofiiae at Jail Road^Raipiar (C*©.). 3. CoMservator ©IForesfe, @^F,Cir©l€^ Raipur (C.G.). WR.IT PETITI©N ¥N©ER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE ©ONSTITUTION GF INBIA : XI-HC-22 3T7^T'^T f^ri^'sn^T 5^^ich ^if^a -^:' ^a? -<4t^ltd1LI, ^Tll^^Ko/ f®!<ni^1< WWTT 5h^i<!h aff^r ^S^K .^.:.e;.^.c>....^.s.^./..^ 200^ 'fq^T'" ^STT^T l^nw^f^r 27.02.2004 On a mention bemg Shri B.K.Paadit, Coiit Shri Raabir Smgh, G| I.A.No.l293/2004fo^ Heard. Leanied counsel foil petitiouer is a victiBi of fre\ witliio. 3 three years as It is further subniitted thatl as Rao.ge Ofiicer, Flyin.g Scj Belgehana Marwahi Forest dated 13.2.2004 which is the name of the petitioner mipugued order. It is also| tlie representation vide Forests, Raipur, which has Haviiig considered th<| aiid inaterial on record, dii'ection is given to representation afresh to fh^ No,2 &3 along^vitli a copy o| days aad oii such repres^ Autiiority/respoiidents No,; --^saaie as early as possible 4iade chNid^'1 ^l^<rif1?"fe1^' iP^^K ^ 3rf^m 3?T^?T ^ tlie matter is taken up, ^isel for the petitioner, A. for tlie State on advance copy. urgenf heamig is allowed, tlie petitioner submitted Uiat the luent traasfers. It is submitted that iy as six traj.isfers have been efiected, now the petitioner who was working [uad, Raipzir has been traiisferred to pivision as Forest Raiiger, vide. order [ander chaJlenge in. tliis petition aiid has been sliowu at Sl.No. 12 iii the submitted tliat the petitioner made ^nexzire P/7 to tlie Consen/rator of [iiot yet been decided. ^ facts and circunistaiices ofthe case tuds of justice wiU be seived if a petitioner to make a detailed ^ Coiiipeteut Authority/ respondents )|Tt3iis order aiid petition witiim seven |intation beiag filed, the Conipetent & 3 shall consider aad clecide the ]j)referably withta a niontli tliereafter. [1(ft^ ^Ra^ tlje XI-HC-22 ^TT^T^T [<-<i<=h ^^ 5h^ii<=b ^i[ia :c^ ^ ^^ ^^r ^l^lld^ ^Tii^^Ko, ^Kni^y 3TTi^T 1^^? wwrr^row"""""""""""""""""" ^. 200 '^^T' 3^T ^<H^T'??f^T ^- If aay grievance still subsis^ ujider the law, Leained counsel for petitiouer has uot beeu reU^ tffl the decision of tlie It is directed tliat if reMeved tiU 3.50 p.m. todayj sucli tiJl fhe decision of the i|i Witli the aforesaid dN of, Conse.quently, M,W. Ncj Ceitij5e.d copy as per repres^ntatlon, chHfd^l'i 'RTR^f ^^^ <P»l^l< ^5 <3^R3^T s, the pai'ties may avail fhe remedy the petitioner submitted fhat the ved and he be aUowed to contmue he petitioner has not ali'eady l3een he shall be allowed to contiiiue as |epresentation, ^ction, tliis petition stands disposecl ,514/ 2004 stmids disposed of. nliles, Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^^a^ 1.^.1 :A ^>