1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION No. 2515 of 2010 Shri Nivrutti Harchand Vasaikar ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others ...Respondents ..... Mr. M.M. Bhokarikar, advocate for the Petitioner Mr. N.R. Shaikh, AGP for respondents ..... CORAM: S.S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 29th MARCH, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner with following prayers :- “a. The petition may kindly be allowed. b. The appropriate Writ and order may kindly be issued against the respondents that they shall correct the record regarding the area of the petitioner’s land and make the entries 2 accordingly in the revenue record regarding the Survey No. 40 of Village Dhudhale, Taluka & District Nandurbar considering the original record. c. The appropriate writ and direction may kindly be issued against the respondents that they shall furnish the details of the change of the area in the form of order, notification or in any manner, if any made by them regarding the agricultural land Survey No. 40 of Village Dhudhale, Taluka & District Nandurbar considering the original record. d. The petitioner may kindly be heard prior to take any decision which may affect the rights of the land of the petitioner, Survey No. 40 of Village Dhudhale, Taluka & District Nandurbar regrading the area as mentioned in the petition. e. Pending hearing and final decision of this petition, no any adverse action may be taken which would cause adverse effect to the rights of the petitioner regarding the property as mentioned in this petition. f. Ad-interim order may kindly be passed in terms of prayer clause (d). g. The record and proceeding of this case may kindly be called as and when necessary. h. Any just and proper order may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. “ 3 2. On perusal of prayers in the petition, it is not clear as to which order is under challenge in this Writ Petition. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner invited my attention to page No. 18 i.e. revenue entry taken by Talathi of Village Dhudhale, dated 14-08-1972. According to the counsel for the petitioner he is aggrieved by the said order passed by the Talathi. 3 It is not in dispute that the entry effected by the Talathi of Village Dhudhale, Taluka & District Nandurbar dated 05-07-1972 is as per the directions of the Collector. It appears that the present petitioner had filed Writ Petition No. 7417 of 2008 before this Court. The said petition was dismissed by this Court by order dated 12-08-2009. The petitioner has disclosed about the filing of the said petition and order passed by this Court in para No. 12 of the petition. 4. On perusal of pleadings in the petition and after hearing the counsel appearing for the petitioner, it appears that, the petitioner is aggrieved by the entry effected by the Talathi of Village Dhudhale, Taluka & District Nandurbar on 05-07-1972 in respect of survey No. 40. There is inordinate delay in challenging the entry made by the Talathi in the record in respect of Survey No. 40. 5. According to the counsel appearing for the petitioner, petitioner would be more contained if he is heard by the appropriate authority 4 and if he is supplied necessary documents, as requested by him. 6. Taking over all view of the matter, and in view of the fact that, this Court has already dismissed Writ Petition No. 7417 of 2008 on 12-08-2009, no case is made out to exercise the writ jurisdiction. However, it is made clear that, it will be open to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, as available in law to seek redressal of his grievance. With these observations, Writ Petition is dismissed. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) SDM* WP2515.10