IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43277 of 2008 1. TASLIM MIAN, S/o Hafiz Mian, R/o Village – Gopalpur, P.S. Mushari, Distt. Muzaffarpur and 2. Ramesh Mahto, D/o Baleshwar Mahto, R/o Vill. – Prahladpur, P.S. – Mushari, Distt. Muzaffarpur. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.12.2008. Heard. On a complaint, cognizance was taken under Sections 323, 504 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. It was alleged that a sum of Rs. 65,000/- was snatched from the complainant. On a revision, cognizance has also been directed to be taken under Section 3(x) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for having had called the complainant by his caste name. The earlier complaint filed by the complainant against the petitioners was rejected in 2003. Petitioners also filed a complaint against the complainant, which complainant has been resolved by a settlement. Taking into account all these factors, the application of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender of the petitioners - 2 - within six weeks from today, let the petitioners, namely, Taslim Mian and Ramesh Mahto be released on bail on their furnishing bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Complaint Case No. 403 of 2004 (Tr. No. 711/08), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. dk ( Barin Ghosh, J. )