THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3833 of 2009 ORAL ORDER: Heard both sides. 2. Challenging the order, dated 19.06.2009, passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge-cum-Appellate Authority under A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, Vijayawada, in R.C.C.M.A.No.166 of 2008, confirming the order, dated 20.08.2008, passed by the Rent Controller- cum-IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, in R.C.C.No.94 of 2007, the tenant has filed the present Civil Revision Petition. 3. I have carefully perused the impugned order, passed by the Court below. I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the impugned order calling for interference by this Court. 4. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner- tenant submits that since the petition schedule property is a residential premises, some reasonable time may be granted to the petitioner to vacate the same. 5. Having regard to the said submission and also keeping in view various other factors, I deem it appropriate to grant some time to the petitioner-tenant to vacate the petition schedule premises. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to vacate the petition schedule premises on or before 31st July 2010 and to that effect, she shall give an undertaking before the Court below. Till such time, the petitioner shall continue to pay the rents of the petition schedule premises to the respondent- landlady. 7. Subject to the above observations and directions, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA​ 19th March 2010 dr