/••" 5' IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR (C.6.) ^^0°) W.P. (S) N0. /2010 PETETIQNER // ^'^ ^^ ^ ^^ly'''^ :^7 ^'^ 'i>.. RESPONDENTS : 1. ^s^ ^)^(^ ^y y. ^T „' s^ <^'.^" ..••'- ^"^/ •^^'" . •^' ^AA^~ Kishore Kumar Sharma, Aged about. 51 years, S/o Vishram Prasad Sharma, Upper bivision Teacher, Government Higher Secondary School Dongergaon, District-Rajnandgaon (C.6.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. birector, Public Instructions RailpUr(C.G.) 3. District Education Officer Rajnandgain (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer bongergaon, bistrict- Rajnandgaon (c.e.) 5. The Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, Don9er9aon, bistt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETETCON UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF THE CONSTCTUION OF INblA F -HC-22 ^Ti^T^T i^ii^ '3^1 ?t>^icb ^rif^ T ~^^ ^IHH^. ^Tll^^Ko. f®l<ni<1^< 3Tli?T ^(^K ^......U.£.^...M....^(» ^(^<?1I ^W^ fci^dsy* ^TT^T '^'^[T^R ^rft?T S.B.: HON'BLE JUSTICE MR. PRJETINKBR DIWAKBR 15-12-2010 Shri K.S,Pawar, couusel foi Shri Vaibhav'Goyerdhaxi, P Gri.evan.ee -of the petiti.on.er in the year 19f17. fl-ie petitioner on a fixed pay scale of Rs. 100 after coinpletion of probation, he ofRs. 169-300. ! tlie petitioiier. •- \L. for ftie State. [ia. fhe present. petiti.cn. is fhat. ^7as a.ppo:mted as Dy. Tea.ch.er [for a period of tovo years aiid [was graoled regular pay scale atid Contention of the counsel enti.fl.ed for regiil.ar pay scale wit.1 appoiiituient and his case is sqi decisions passed by tliis Coiirt by fhe M.P, State Adm.iB.istrative 2745/89 IMadhufcant Yadu & 5(< Others) whereia it has been hel4 are entitled for regulai- pay scal^ appoiiitBient, It is not disputed by both taken up by the State to the Ape^ disndssed by tbe Apex Coiirt Tribunal to the effect fhat the T^ entitEed for regular pay scale appoiritam.ent. In view of tlie above subni: cnHf<n<flti +iiH<yiT ^ Fs^l <p3i-^i< '^^^TR.yn^T |br the petitioner is that he is h, efiect from. the date of initial ^arelv covered wifh nuniber of also fhe judgnient reiidered 'ribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No- 6 Others Vs. State of M.P. & that siaiilarly placed teachers from. the date of their iiiitial :h.e parties that the .m.a.tter was Court but th.e appeal was also ipholdmg fhe decision of the achers/Assistant Teachers are rom the date of their iriitial. .ssion .made by the counsel for "the-paT-tieo, the-^e-tition is-di^po^d.^fJxiJ±i£Laam.e.t£jjiL%i^...J^.e^ l-ft^ i-fT-r, \1 + ^-HC-22 ^ ~3~^r ^ii^ld<Ll, ^•nlw<5, i®i<ni^y •^-^ STT^T 'CR^ WWTT 9hH(<^ "W^ 200 '^^ST' ^?I ^T f^ri^T'sn^? $t)^ich ^ri^^f 3TT^T ^RTf^H: ^?r petitioner is granted libeity to advisedy ia the Mght of the albres^ dated 13.1.09 (Annextire P/2) rcspondent is directed to conside] and in its perspective. If the footiag as per order passed by tb m Madhukaiit Yadu (supra) and Suprem-e Cdirt in. Special Leave F order dated 3.1.1995, the petitio reMef accordmgly. It is expected froni fhe stat order after diie scrutiay of fhe fac^ 4iake a representatiou, if so ^id judgnient and the circular ^nd in tujri, fh.e conceiTied their ca.se cn its own merits pejtitiouer stands on the saxne State Adia-mistrate Tribuxial sjubsequently confirmed by the fetition (Civil) No. 6892/93 by |ier m.ay be entitled to saine It is raade clear that this opniiori ou nierits of tlie case would be at liberty to decide accordance with law. ^N^^I'I Hi^<nT1?'feT^I' <r3l^l< i73:Tf^R'3n^T autliorities to pass suitable •.s. pourt has not expressed aay ^nd fh.e au.thori.ty concemed Ipie representation strictly io Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge f-.ft^ -S-fe^