IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18573 of 2009 BHARAT YADAV, S/o Parmeshwar Yadav, Resident of Mohalla- Dih Jamalpur, P.S.-Jamalpur, District-Munger. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Mahabir Bhagat, S/o Late Laxami Kant Bhagat. 3. Kaushalya Devi, W/o Sri Mahabir Bhagat. 4. Anand Kumar, S/o Sri Mahabir Bhagat. Sl. Nos. 2 to 4 are resident of Bekapur, P.S.-Kotwali, District- Munger. ----------- 02. 21.06.2011 The petitioner who is the complainant is aggrieved with the order dated 27.11.2008 passed by Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Munger in Complaint Case No. 385C of 2008 by which it has taken cognizance only under Section 138 N.I. Act but not under the provisions of Indian Penal Code. Since even at the subsequent stage the Court can frame charges if such offences are made out, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is disposed off with the direction to the Court below to consider the grievances of the petitioner at the appropriate stage. With these observations, the application is disposed off. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)