AT BILASPUR LIIG CURT OF CHHATTISG . , Writ Petition No. 14.28 or2004 2 g ETII‘EIONER A Prangya Mahlla landal Vlllage Bhansula through PreSIdent S t BmJhwarm Ba1 Aged about 50 years W/o Devar Qmgh R/o Bhansula Tah Chowk1 Dlstt RaJnandgaon (CG) %- VERSUS ‘ RESPoNDENTs : 1. r _ g E State of Chhattisggarh through Secretary, Panchay'at & Social Welfare, ‘DKS Bhawan, - Rmpur (CG) » 2. CEO Janpad Panchayat Ambagarh ChowkJ Tah Chowkr D1stt Rajnandgaon (CG) Collector, Rajnandgaon (CG) Maa Laxmr Mah11a Mandal Vlllage Bhansula through Presldent D1geshwan Bal, R/o vrllage l Bhansula Tah Chowk1 Dlstt Rajnandgoan 1' (CG). ‘ ' € PE” (WRrr PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTIIUHON OF INDIA) i g (SB Hon'ble Mr Satish K. Agmhotn, J ) Bg freseIlt Shn Narendra Chandel Advocate for the petmoner Shn V1nay Ham, Deputy Advocate General for the State A ORAL ORDER ' (Passed on 25m day of September, 2008) W1th the consent of the partres the matter 1s taken up for hearmg ‘ finally :The petmoner by thls petmon seeks a wrlt 1n the nature of mandamus agamst the respondent No 1 to 3 to comply w1th the order dated 13 03 2000 (Annexure P/l) ‘ Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that thei financlal approval has been granted for a sum of Rs 83 200/- to: L 7' construct commumty hall 1n the v1llage Bhansula, Gram Panchayat Pongan Dlstt Rajnandgaon ' V‘ 1 - EH O P W l ‘ 0n perusal of the .order dated 13.03%.2000 (Annexure P/rl),it is ‘ Eevident thaf this is not a financial sancti'lon order passed by the State i Government, l but is a technical sanction of Sub Divisional Officer of 1 the concerned department i.e. Rnral Engineering Services l Department. Shri Harit submits that the order dated 13.03.2000 is not'a' budgetary/administrative approval. The said order is in the form of f estimate, not the Sanction. ' . By no stretch of imagination, it can be hold that it is a§ budgetary/administrativeapproval. of the State Government. This is mere a technical sanction which was to be sent to the State i Government for budgetary/administrative approval. Nothing has i happened after technical approval of the Rural Engineering Department. Thus, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. This is not a case where financial sanction has been granted by the State . Government and despite approval, the fund has not been released. . The petition is meritless, hivolOus and deserves to be dismissed. The petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. l i Sdl- Sau.§1 K Agnihoui ‘ I Judge ‘ w : i