(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 146 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 146 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 146 OF 2004 Nutan Warehousing Co. Pvt.Ltd. & Ors....Petitioners Versus Mr. Srinivasan, Branch Manager Indian Bank ...Respondent ..... Mr. Mane h/f Uday Warunjikar, counsel for Petitioner ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 16TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 16TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 16TH FEBRUARY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. It is apparent from the averments made in the petition as well as the arguments advanced by Mr. Mane, the learned counsel for the petitioners that there is no case of contempt within the meaning of Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Mr. Mane, submitted that the respondents are guilty of making statements contrary to the facts and thus, creating obstacles in due course of judicial proceedings. 2. The Registry is therefore, directed to place this petition before the appropriate Bench on the criminal side as and when circulated.