IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.O.P.C. (T) No. 127 of 2008. Decided on: 22nd October, 2010. Ashok Kumar Chauhan. …Petitioner. -Versus- Shri Trilok Chand Janartha and others. .…Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. R.S. Gautam, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. N.D. Sharma, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The judgment in question has been implemented. Consequently, the present petition is rendered infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to make a representation, if he is still aggrieved by any in action on the part of the respondents. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 22, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?