Crl.M.No.M-23480 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-23480 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 18, 2010 Parshotam Dass Bansal .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Ashok Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.43, dated 20.6.2010, under Sections 272, 273, 420, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Sector 19, Panchkula. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully. Brief allegations are that there was a secret information against the present petitioner and co-accused Swaran Singh that they were indulging in manufacturing duplicate butter and ghee and selling the same to innocent customers as pure ghee. Hence, a naka was laid. Vehicle bearing registration No.PB65-F-7221 was intercepted from which 1 qtl. 80 kg. of duplicate butter was recovered. Co-accused Swarn Singh was arrested and he disclosed that he alongwith present petitioner-accused was indulging in manufacturing of duplicate butter. Petitioner-accused used to run a milk diary, though he has taken a stand that the same has been closed now. It has been contended that petitioner-accused is suffering from many ailments. However, perusal of ultrasound report shows that he is having right renal calculus and is getting treatment from PGI, Chandigarh. Anticipatory bail application of co-accused Satnam Singh has already been Crl.M.No.M-23480 of 2010 (O&M) -2- dismissed by this Court in Crl.M.No.M-20100 of 2010, vide order dated 16.7.2010. Hence, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Parshotam Dass Bansal, for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 18.8.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge