1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2603 OF 2009 Mr.Dharmesh Parikh & Anr. : Applicants V/s. Nishima Industries & Anr. : Respondents .... Mr.P.A. Siddiqui for the applicants. Mr.Avesh Kayer with Mr.K.S.Pachoo for respondent no.1. Ms M.H.Mhatre, Addl. Public Prosecuor for the State. .... CORAM : S.A. BOBDE, J. DATE : JULY 30, 2009. P.C.: 1. This is an application under section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for quashing and setting aside the F.I.R. in respect of infringement of trade mark under sections 63 and 51 of the Copyright Act. The applicant has approached this Court for relief on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties i.e. between the complainant and the applicant. The statement is on record at exh.`B’ to the affidavit of Parag Harshad Kamdar, Partner of the respondent no.1. The parties admit the statement which is styled as a Deed of Undertaking whereunder mutual rights and liabilities of the parties in relation to the trade mark in question has been 2 settled. Having regard to the fact that the dispute between the parties is in the nature of a private dispute where the rights of the parties alone are involved and the public at large are not concerned with, I consider it appropriate in the interest of justice to accept the plea of the parties and quash the F.I.R., having regard to the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Madan Mohan Abbot v. State of Punjab [(2008) 4 SCC 582] and Manoj Sharma v. State & Ors. (MANU/SC/8122/2008) = (2008 (4) KLT 417 (SC). In the circumstances, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor has no objection. 2. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). S.A. BOBDE, J.