IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 31ST JANUARY 2008 / 11TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 3611 of 2008(E) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- M.K.RAVINDRAN, S/O.KARAPPAN, AGED 60 YEARS, MUDAVANGATTIL HOUSE, CHAZHOOR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, (R.C.OWNER OF SC VEHICLE KL-8AE.413). BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 3611 OF 2008 E ===================== Dated this the 31st day of January, 2008 J U D G M E N T By Ext.P1, permit was granted to the petitioner subject to the counter signature. It is also stated that by Ext.P2 counter signature was also granted by the sister RTA. Initially petitioner was granted thirty days time from 22/10/2007 for production of current records. It is stated by the petitioner that he could not comply with that requirement, but submitted Ext.P3 application for extension of time by three months as is permissible in the rules. Petitioner submits that orders have not been passed on Ext.P3 and therefore has approached this court seeking a direction to allow him time by three months for production of current records. In view of the prevailing rules, I do not find any reason for declining the relief sought for. Irrespective of that, now that WPC 3611/08 :2 : Ext.P3 is pending consideration of the 2nd respondent, I direct that the 2nd respondent shall pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within three weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp