HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.387 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION NO.387 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION NO.387 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 294 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 294 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 294 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 256 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 256 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 256 OF 2008 Smt. Nirmaladevi Ramkripal Kori and Anr. ... Applicants Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr.M.A. Dharmaraj for the Applicant. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, A.P.P. for State. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATED: APRIL 21, 2008 DATED: APRIL 21, 2008 DATED: APRIL 21, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . In our opinion, considering the judgment of the Supreme Court in State of Kerala Vs.M.M. Manikantan Nair, AIR 2001 SC 2145, the review would not lie in Criminal proceedings. . The learned counsel drew our attention to the judgment of the Division Bench of Madras High Court in the case of Balasundara Pavalar, AIR(38) 1951 Madras 7. We have perused the said judgment. That judgment only holds that the second bail application is maintainable. That is not the authority for the proposition that the review lies. . Considering the above, in our opinion, the present review application is not maintainable. Hence, rejected. . We make it clear that if the applicant is entitled to move fresh application, disposal of this review application will not stand in his way. Application accordingly disposed of. (K.V.CHANDIWAL, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (K.V.CHANDIWAL, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (K.V.CHANDIWAL, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)