IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3246 of 2008 1. Gajendra Kumar Singh 2. Jayendra Kumar Singh 3. Amrendra Kumar 4. Shivendra Kumar All sons of Late Laganbarti Devi and Late Birendra Kumar Singh, all residents of village Bahadurpur, P.O. Karauta, P.S. Bakhtiyarpur, District Patna. 5. Asha Devi, daughter of Late Laganbarti Devi, wife of Sri Pramod Kumar Singh 6. Usha Devi, daughter of Late Laganbarti Devi, wife of Somnath Singh Both residents of village Saidanpur, P.O. Nandlalabad, P.S. Gaurichak, District Patna. 7. Nilam Singh, daughter of Late Laganbarti Devi, wife of Mannu Kumar, resident of village Akauna, P.O. Punpun, District Patna. ………Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Sri Vishwanath Singh, Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. …….Opposite parties. For the petitioners : M/s Abhay Kr. Thakur and Sanjay Kumar, Advocates. For opposite party no.1 : Mr. Diwakar Yadav, AC to AAG 6 For opposite party no.2 : Mr. Nikesh Kumar, Advocate. ----------- 12/ 05.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the opposite parties. 2. This petition has been filed for initiating a contempt proceeding against the Commissioner of Patna Municipal Corporation for his disobedience of order of this court dated 30.06.2008 by which C.W.J.C. No.15629 of 2006 was disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation within two weeks from 30.06.2008 along with a copy of that order and a copy of her application dated 16.08.2005 filed before the said authority and also along with 2 other relevant documents available with her and if such an application is filed within the aforesaid prescribed time, the said authority of the Corporation will look into the matter in detail along with the provisions of the Vth and VIth Pay Revision Committees’ Reports and pass an appropriate speaking order with respect to proper accounting of various heads of retiral dues payable to the petitioner on the basis of the aforesaid Pay Revision in accordance with law within eight weeks thereafter and also if any amount was found payable to the petitioner it must be paid to her within eight weeks of passing of such order by the Commissioner. 3. A show-cause as well as a supplementary show-cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite parties tendering unqualified apologies and also producing an order dated 27.04.2010 (Annexure–C) passed by the Commissioner of Patna Municipal Corporation which shows that the said order of this court has been complied, but belatedly. Learned counsel for the opposite party (Corporation) also states that the admitted dues as per the aforesaid calculation are lying with the Corporation and the substituted heirs of the sole petitioner may approach along with Succession Certificate on any date and the said amount shall be paid to them. 4. However, learned counsel for the petitioners is not satisfied with the calculation made in the said order of the Commissioner of Patna Municipal Corporation dated 27.04.2010. 3 Hence he will be at liberty to challenge the said order before an appropriate authority. 5. Accordingly, in view of the said compliance and apology, this petition is disposed of. harish/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )