1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.7637 OF 2008 Shivbhushan s/o Laxmanrao Jadhav, Age : 36 years, Occu.Agril. And social work r/o Patoda Tq. Patoda, District Beed ..PETITIONER VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, Rural Development Department, State of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, Mumbai 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad 3. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samittee, Bhoom, District Osmanabad 4. The Registrar/Village Development Officer, Grampanchayat Ieet, Tq. Bhoom, District Osmanabad 5. Anand s/o Babasaheb Jadhav, Age : 36 years, occu.Business r/o Near S.T. Bus Stand Patoda, Tq. Patoda, District Beed ..RESPONDENTS Mr N.L. Jadhav, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr N.N. Jadhav, AGP for respondent no.1; 2 Mr S. B. Ghute, Advocate for respondent no.2; Mr K.J. Ghute Patil, Advocate for respondents no.3 & 4; Mr N.S. Kadam, Advocate for respondent no.5. CORAM: P.V. HARDAS AND R.K.DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 24th JUNE, 2009. ORAL JUDGMENT: [PER P.V. HARDAS, J.] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ directing respondents to decide the complaint of the petitioner dated 18.2.2008. In the light of the limited relief which the petitioner has prayed for in this petition, we deem it appropriate to decide this petition at this stage. 3. We have heard Shri N.L. Jadhav, learned Counsel for the petitioner; Shri N.N. Jadhav, learned A.G.P. For respondent no.1; Shri S.B. Ghute for respondent no.2; Shri K.J. Ghute Patil, learned Counsel for respondents no.3 & 4 and Shri N.S. Kadam, learned Counsel for respondent no.5. Mr K.J. Ghute Patil, learned Counsel for respondents no.3 & 4 states 3 on written instructions from the respondents that since notices have been issued on the basis of the complaint received from the petitioner, the respondents would decide the said complaint in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from today. We accept the aforesaid statement as an undertaking to the Court. 4. This petition is accordingly allowed accepting the statement made on behalf of the respondents that the complaint of the petitioner would be decided in accordance with law within four weeks from today. Rule is thus made absolute on the above terms with no order as to costs. [ R.K. DESHPANDE, J ] [ P.V. HARDAS, J ] amj/wp7637.08 4