IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 22ND FEBRUARY 2010 / 3RD PHALGUNA 1931 CRP.No. 218 of 2008() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 19/12/2007 IN IA.4000/07,IA.4095/07 IN OPMV.160/1990 of MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, KALPETTA .................... REVN. PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ----------------------------------- ELIYAMMA @ MOLY, AGED 48 YEARS, D/O. MATHAI, KALLIKKADAN HOUSE, KEEZHILLAM KARA, RAYAMANGALAM, MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADV. SMT.P.V.KOCHUTHRESIA RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------------- 1. RELSY, D/O. RUBY, RESIDING AT KAVANAL HOUSE, MEKKADAMBU P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA. 2. ROOSY, D/O. RUBY, RESIDING AT KAVANAL HOUSE, MEKKADAMBU P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA. 3. K.A. THOMAS, S/O. ANTONY, KAROTTEKUNNUPURATHU, PALAKKUZHA, KOOTHATTUKULAM. 4. BABU KURIAN, S/O. KURIAKOSE, OLIKKAL HOUSE, MUNNAMKUNNU P.O., KOOTHATTUKULAM. 5. T.M. JACOB, S/O. PYLEEKUNJU, POTHANATHU HOUSE, PUTHENCRUZ. 6. DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO., KULANGARA TOWERS, MUVATTUPUZHA. 7. ELIYAMMA, W/O. SCARIA, KAVANAL, KADATHY, MEKKADAMPU P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA. 8. SCARIA, KAVANAL, -DO- -DO-. 9. LILLY, D/O. SCARIA, -DO- -DO-. 10. STANLY, S/O. SCARIA -DO- -DO-. ADV. MATHEW JACOB FOR R6 MARY BENJAMIN THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.BHAVADASAN, J. ------------------------- C.R.P No.218 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 22nd February, 2010 O R D E R In this revision petition, the petitioner seeks to have the order dated 19.12.2007 in I.A No.4000/07 in O.P 160/90 of the MACT Kalpetta quashed. 2. Petitioner is the claimant in O.P No.160/90 before the MACT Kalpetta and an Award was passed by the M.A.C.T. The Insurance Company deposited the amount covered by the Award. 3. In the meanwhile, petitioners preferred an appeal before this Court as MFA 7/98. By judgment dated 21.10.2004, this Court allowed the appeal and enhanced the compensation by Rs.43,875/- with 9% interest thereon. Thereafter, it appears that the petitioner has filed E.P. No.31/2005 for execution of the award before the M.A.C.T Muvattupuzha and for necessary reliefs. That Court on an assumption that records were before the MACT Kalpetta, dismissed the petition and hence the revision. C.R.P No.218 of 2008 2 4. Learned counsel appearing for the Insurance Company pointed out that he has sought information from the Insurance Company as to whether the enhanced amount has been paid and award has been satisfied to that extent also. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner pointed that he will be satisfied with a direction to consider the matter again and dispose of the matter by the MACT Muvattupuzha, as expeditiously as possible, There will be a direction to the MACT Muvattupuzha to consider and dispose of the matter, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of appearance on 17.3.2010. The Civil Revision Pension is disposed of, as above. P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE ma C.R.P No.218 of 2008 3 C.R.P No.218 of 2008 4