aiSs^t^'^,'-'- ^ Writ Petition (Si No.3916 of 2007 PETITiONER Lok Nath Patei. S/o. Shri Hiradhar Pate!, Aged about 48 years, Assistant Teacher, Janpad Boy's Primary Schoo!, Chandrapur, Biock Dabhara, Dist. Janjgir-ChaiTipa (CG). RESPONDENTS Versus 1) 2) 3) 4) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secrstary, Schooi Educatfon Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distr'ct - Raipur, CG. The Director, PubHc instruction, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (CG). The District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Ralgarh, (CG). Block Education Officer, Block Dabhra, Disfrict Janjgir-Champa, (Writ Peti SB underArticie 226 ofthe Constitution of india) Hon'bie Mr. JusticeSatish K. Agnihotri Present: Shri Sanjay Pats!, counsei for the petitione.r. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. (Passed on 11th Juiy, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher on probation for a period of three years. Thereafter, in view of the judgment and order dafed ,7-11-200-6 passed Writ Petition (S) No. 5976 of 2006 (Sushii Tiwari & others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & others), the petitioner is entitied to payment of reguiar salary from the initial date of aoDointment. 2. On perusal of the appointment order (Annexure P/1), the petitioner was never appointed on probation. He was appointed for a psriod of two years on payment of fixed pay l.e., Rs.150/-, thereafter Rs.250/- and !ast!y he was granted a pay scate of Rs. 169-300/-. Vide order dated 1-7-1981 pay scale of the petitioner was revised to Rs.545/- - Rs. S25/-. 3. The cas®of SushiS Tiwari (supra) is on different facts as it is wei! estabiished position of !aw that If a person is appointeci on probation and if he completes probation successfuiiy he shouid normaiSy be granted reguiar pay scale with effect from the date of initiai appointment. It Is not the case in tbe present petition. The petitioner was never appointed on probation, but the petitioner was granted dlfferent pay scaies at different times. 4. Learned counsej appearing for the petitloner has not raised any other point for grant of revised pay scale with effect from iniiial appointment which was on a fixed pay scaie of Rs.150/-. 5. As a resuit and for the for^going reasons, ihere is no merit in the case. Accordinglv, the Detition is dismissed summariiv. Sd^ Satish K.Agnihotri Judge . raju ^*