IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28384 of 2008 BACHU MAHTO @ BACHCHU MAHTO SON OF KEDAR MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHAWAT, P.S. ARIARI(KASAR), DISTRICT SHEIKHPURA ---------------------PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR-------------------OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 03. 10.11.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 302/34 of the Penal Code which was registered against 5-6 unknown accused. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been implicated in this case during investigation along with one Chhotiya and Pintu Mahto as they were seen sitting over a culvert near the place and time of occurrence. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the said Chhotiya has been admitted to the privilege of bail by another bench of this Court and there is nothing to distinguish the case of the petitioner with that of Chhotiya. Let the court below verify that Chhotiya has been admitted to the privilege of bail and if he has been admitted to the privilege of bail then petitioner, namely, Bachu Mahto @ Bachchu Mahto is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 125 of 2002. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J)