1^^'t. •: :..;;':.'"^.::^'t';:^ .^ ,:?..::'':^.^^:^'^yMF'<s<i(1^'^^^^^^]^^^^^^ ^-">y^<'-^^i^n-^B^^^^ s 2B Bll: lTffiH<£3WLB^(^H;£:OS '';£^ i^ •:^'^iA/RTT.^il;TIOiNlrSy^N^ PETITKaNEFt -..."-' / ^ Atfff*' ^' '^^ fr' ^SPOIMDEMTS 1% . : ;T'l:lSrtft.Afu|ya^Baghel^^ 3s aroQw?BagRel,;..aged^^^ , ~^29iyears,'Resiaent6f^Dara Baraclwar, District Janjg^^^^^ ,^^;<^.(l.).'::'..:i^.l,;.:;' •VESSIJS::.::1'^:;.;.^';:". :: •••l..:';J''^v,'^^^ '•Ss:''•'.'••'••'. ':;.""-•••''':'•••.•.•'•.'.••:• ••' •.:';^'..:'.'. .."":- ;.'-'' '•.:• •'^•"- .'••'.'. • l."-StatedfChtiattisgarh,Thr6ygh^'^^ TKe' Secretary, 'Deparfment^^ ^ Urban ^ Aamini^rStion,^ .K.K.S.; i; 'Bhawari,:^ipur:CC.G.). .^-:'^ %®^1'hg',fA'aditional^^([ec:tQF,^ /^:^:^^::?i0isfric^:S]^ri3§^ ^TBpai<© j?IS^^^Ttie^:CTie1^Munici:j:)alf'^ f^ ^'.Panchayat •'.'BaradwSr,^'^^^ Janjgir-CliarriRa^G.G^. ^^^. """'Sga'i; » 4^ IMbhitiKumgrrSon^^^o^ .;syi^aWanlhi,^'':^CR^!d:ent^% BaraClwar,?Wra^Nb.A,.Ta^l^akli,,| ,^..;:: •: ^Dis ica:::3anBiT-G;tTOmR^^(:G:.e.3.:^^ •VtfRl^PeTITTONriJN^^ttSg^S®^ ::Y'I'.'.:-.^INE>IA%.'.;';-;:,:®:I:^/;' » "ris^S; HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTiSGARH:B!LASPUR WRiT.PETiTiONIS) N0,7702 QF 2007 PETITIONER RESPOF-4DENTS Smt. Ahiiya Baghe! Versus Sfats of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ oetition under Article 227 of the Constitytion of Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J Present:- Shri P.P. Sahu, Advocate for th®pefitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panet Lawyerforthe State. Shri K.N. Nande, Advocate for ths respondent ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on ihis 28;" day of October, 2009) 1. W'ith the consent of iearnsd counsei appearing for the parties, the petitlon Is heard finaSSy. 2. Chaiienae in this petition ts to the order dated 5-12-2007 (Annexure - P/9) passed by the Additionai Coilector, Janjgir-Champa. in appea! N0.6S/A-89 (5)/06-07 whereby the appoinfment of the pstitioner on the Dosf of'Shiksha Kar;~si Grade - !i was canceiied on account of ths fnct that 12 marks was gsven io the pstitsoner on the basis of exoerience certificats, which Is a fcrsed ons and ii v/as 'directed to aDDoint the resDondent No.4 herein on the basis of marks obtained bynim. 3. ! have heard learned counse! appearing for the oarties, psrussd the Dieadinas and the documents aooended thereto. 4. From imDugned order dated 5-12-2007, it Is evident that an objection was raised that one S'nri Harishankar Dhirtiahre and Shri Burishrav Kurre had also made aDpiications for aoDointment on the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade - !i. The said objection was relected on the sround that no aopiicatlon has been moveci. The Additional Coiiector ^ further obsewed that he had gone fhrough the documents and it is found thai the navt candidat®who hsd obtained more marks is respondent No.4. Thus, ihe appointment of th®petitionsr herein would be cance'ied and the respondenf No.4 herein wouid be appolnted in place of the petitioner. On perusai of the documenis submitted by ths respondent No.4 annexed to the return datea 29-2-2008. it is found that the totai marks obtalned bv Shri Harishankar D'nirtlahr® is 43.20 and the resoondent No.4 has obtalned 40.32. Shri Harishanxar Dhirtiahre. who was not afforded any opportunity of hearing, had gos ?no?s marks thsn the respondent No.4. Thus, the impugned order suffers from inflrrnfry. Ths Additionaj Co!!ector has not looked into She documents, therefore, the impugned order directlng appc.jnting the respondent No.4 is contrary' to the facts avaiiabis on rscora'. There is a clear Infirmlr/ and iileaality in iaw aiso. in viev/ offorsaolna. the impugned ordsr dsted 5-12-2007 i'Annexure - P/9) is quashed. The mstter is remittsd cack to the office of the Additional Coitector, Janjfiir-Champa. ••"ith a dlrection to hear the 8 to al! t! matter afresh after affording an opportunity of hearing to Dersons concerned and further afier examinina ths • obtained by sSl She candidates, who raada appiications for appointTient on the post of Shlksha Karmi Grade - IS In Nagar Panchayat, Naya Baradv/ar and pass appropriate order, in accordance with law and on its own msrits. 7. Accordingly, ths writ petition is allowed to the exteni indicated above. No order asto costs. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge /