IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14381 of 2005 RAM NANDAN SHARMA Versus B.S.R.T.CORPORATION & ORS ----------- 3 25.7.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner approached the High Court because he was not being given the benefit of time bound promotion and the consequential monetary benefit arising out of the same. But then for a long time of period the respondent Bihar State Road Transport Corporation has had precarious financial condition. Not only this there have been certain orders passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in some dispute which travelled before the Court why payments and other financial benefits was not accruing to its employees. A counter affidavit has now been filed by the respondents in which they have stated that vide Office Order No. 522 dated 3.10.2007 the Corporation in its wisdom has now extended the benefit to its employees in terms of the said decision. The stand is that the grievance of the petitioner with large number of other employees of the Corporation are being considered in the light of the said decision In view of the above no adjudication is required in the matter. This writ application is disposed of with a direction that the respondents would be well advised to do the needful in terms of their own decision which has been brought on record. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)