IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39369 of 2009 MD.SUHAIL AHMAD @ JAFFAR . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . with Cr.Misc. No.39844 of 2009 MD.HAFIZ AZIZUR RAHMAN . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . with Cr.Misc. No.41647 of 2009 1. AJIT JHA 2. Md. Pyare Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 17.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, for the State and learned counsel for the Informant. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a Police case under Sections 302, 307 and other provisions of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The common defence in all the three applications is that only Md. Nayeem and Md. Islam are alleged to have been present when the assault took place by them. There is no reference of presence of any third person even by the person accompanying the deceased at the time of assault. Counsel for the State points out that the allegations are of alleged conspiracy done about a month earlier. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Madhubani in 2 Sakari P.S. case No. 433 of 2008, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)