1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No. 496 of 2009 IN Writ Petition No.4051 of 2000 [decided] [Shreechand L. Jethani Vs. M/s. Sadhana Sahakari Bank Ltd. & another] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr.J.L. Bhoot, Adv., for the appellant. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND P.B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : 25th February, 2010. 1. Heard learned Adv. Mr. J.L. Bhoot for the appellant. 2. Admittedly, appellant was pursuing personal grievance. A personal grievance could be agitated if the complaint is in relation to Item No.9 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act. 3. The Item No.5 of Schedule-IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act has relevance with the Trade Union-related practices. 2 4. Appellant's grievance is simply due to supersession, and as found by learned Single Judge, it revolved around the “power of selection” in the process of promotions guided by merit-cum-seniority. The Judgment of learned Single Judge, therefore, cannot be assailed as erroneous. 5. No indulgence is called for. 6. In the circumstances, Appeal has no merit and is rejected. Judge Judge |Hedau|