1 wp2534-11 jpc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVILWRIT PETITION NO. 2534 OF 2011 Ravindra Shamkant Shivrame .. Petitioner Versus Sou. Sarojini R. Sulochane and another ... Respondents Ms. Deepa Matwankar for the petitioner Mr. V. N.Tayade for Respondent No.1 Ms. Uma G. Wagle for Respondent No.2 CORAM : R. Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 3rd October, 2011 P.C. 1. Head learned advocates on both sides. 2. The decree passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division Nashik on 24th April, 2002 in Special Civil Suit No. 375 of 1997 is confirmed in the First Appeal St., No. 31599 of 2010. In view of this, the property covered by decree dated 20th April, 2002 is required to be attended to, to comply with the said decree. On the basis of record, it is clear that the said properties which are covered by the decree will have to be sold, as the the property cannot be divided conveniently. However, the petitioner has offered a particular figure to the contesting respondents saying that by accepting a figure which is in the tune 2 wp2534-11 of Rs.2 laks and odd amount, the contesting respondents should give up their shares. Such a submission cannot be accepted when the contesting respondents are not agreeable for this suggestion. It is in this circumstance, the impugned order is properly passed. No interference is required in the impugned order. The petition is dismissed. 3. There shall be no order as to costs. (R. Y. GANOO, J.)