IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13898 of 2009 DUDHESHWAR PANDEY S/O LATE MUKHDEO PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILL.- PANDEY DEHRI, P.S.- KARAKAT, DISTT.- ROHTAS, AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF E-6/1, JAWAHAR PARK, DEVLI ROAD, P.S.- KHANPUR, NEW DELHI --- Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE & PROHIBITION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. COMMISSIONER, EXCISE & PROHIBITION DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE & PROHIBITION DEPARTMENT, ROHTAS. 4. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL OF BIHAR, PATNA. --- Respondents ----------- 4. 4.2.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State as also the learned counsel appearing for the Accountant General. Mr. B.K. Labh, learned counsel appearing for the Accountant General submits that the authority for payment of the revised pension has already been issued and a copy of the same has also been sent to the petitioner. As regards the claim for payment of provident fund dues and the balance amount towards unutilized leave, it has been stated in paragraph 10 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondents no.2 and 3 to the effect that the authority for payment of the G.P.F. amount for a sum of Rs.1,82,991/- and difference amount of earned leave to the tune of Rs.2,192/- has already been availed by the petitioner. In view of the statements made in the counter affidavit as also the submissions made on behalf of the Accountant General, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case may be disposed of. However, it will be open for the petitioner to place before 2 the authority concerned with regard to any other balance claims remain to be settled. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of with the liberty aforementioned to the petitioner. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)