HISH^OURT OF CHHATnSSARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENGH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI JA6&ISH 6UAUA. Ag. C3. HON'BLESMRI SAtISH K. ASNIHOTTSI. J. Writ ADpea! No. 270 of 2007 Appellant Resoondents ^Francis Xavier Beck, S/o Late l^abil Beck, aged about 38 years, R/'e Indira Nagar village Fundurdihar'i, Ambikapur, Distnct Sarguja, (Chhattisgarti). Versus 1. Stdte of Chhattisgarh, Through ; Secre'tary t-lome O.K.S. Bhdwan Raipyr, District Raipur, ^hhattisgarh). 2. Director Seneral of Police Chhattisgarh, Raipur, district Rdipur, (Chhcrttisgarh). 3. Inspector fienerat of Police, Chhdttisgarh, Raipur, t)jstrict Raipur, (Chhatt-isgarh) 4. Superihtendent of Police Sarguja; tiistrict Sarguja, (Chhattisgarh) 5. Ashwini Shriwastava, Sub Inspector (M) 10th Wohjni, Cbhattisgorh Arms forcs Sarguja (Ghhattisgar+i). Writ ADpeal under Section Zft^o'Rlthe C.& Hiqh Court, ApBeal'to Division BenehlMct 2QQ6 PresenT:' Shri JSBdrtk,,Goui'(asill$ot'|-ftie^a|)pel)flnt.i,.:::.lr Shri NK AgpiMWal, l3te^i.Hy |®oviei*BmentAdyoGOte; for • the Stat®.\ ' ' !; l'^":,-l;l';';:' '- 'i • ; :1 i ! : l;i 1^1:; 111 OgALORbER (Passed on 29th October. 2007) The following orot order of the Court was passeS by Hon'blejagdish Bhalla.Ag. C.J. - This appeal arises out of judgmenf passed in writ petition (S) No.4856/2007 by Hon'ble Single Judge dismissing the writ petition filed by the petil'ioner/dppetlant wherein the petitioner has challenged jhis transfer order ori the bcsis of malice alleged against one State Minister. When enqyired about the details of the State Minister, we have been informed by learned counsel for the petitioner •that he is not (Mwar®about porl-folio of •tih^sfflicl minister, whetHer 1-lome Depoirtment or some other depdrtmen-t-. t-earned counsel for the (ippellant further informs that tlie ^inister concferned has iwr'il^n a letfer for transfer 6f respondent No.5 at Surguja. 1-lewever there js n6 recommendation that the petitjoner should be dispkiced in the process. Ths petitioner has been transferr^ on -riie tocali arrangemen-t- by tt'ie SLiperintendent^of Pdtice, uri'io has o.11 the authorMy to transfer personinhiSowndistrict.: ; The tnansfer orders ean only bemterfered in viewiof judgnnents of the Apex Coup^cmy^othe^ Righ GotirtS;<>n 'the ^.^' '' -'^. ^ ' . ^ • of violation ofloworm^i^i^t'T'here^isno atlfegostion regar'diri^ ^eviolation ofilcw. Mowever.l-lTer^ isfaintaiiegiation^^^b agctjnst the 5tateli Mihister, ^whjch' ^•ftie peti't'ioner COBI(I| s substanticrtB before the Hon'bte Single Judge. f:wA\er, Mmistet' was not impleoded as parfy to cfeferid himself. Leamed coynsel for the Qppellant failed to substantMite poiots raised by him. Even though we afforded an OppoTtunity to tearhed counsel for the petitioner, he could not substantiorte the same. In absence of the ingi'edients referred to hereinabove, no interfer'ence is warnmtecl in thisappeal. Accordingiy, thjsappeal isciismissed. Saos1 Sd/- ActmgChiefJ^ce ^^Bbow 3ud&e V" |il!lli: Wii 1.11 :! ^is'l:' ;H " ii' i