IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14260 of 2011 1. VIJAY KUMAR @ DABBU GUPTA 2. PAPPU KUMAR 3. SANJAY KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 342, 384, 420, 380 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that the petitioners used to purchase the grains from the complainant but the due amount of Rs. 2,03,160/- has not been paid by the petitioners. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that there was business relation between parties and the petitioners have paid the amount except Rs. 68,320/- which they undertake to deposit before the learned court below within a period of two months in two equal installments. The aforesaid amount will be invested in some fix deposit schemes which will be subject to the 2 result of the case. It is further submitted that the accusation of making assault and taking signature on plain paper is absolutely frivolous. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Complaint Case No. 1453/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Till the deposit of the aforesaid payment, the bail bond of the petitioners will be provisionally accepted. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)