IWTHEHIGHCGURTOF.JUDICATUREATBILASPUR PETITIONER WRITPETITION(S)No.^-/2S"OF2Q06 ^ G.P.Das Aged about 53 Years S/oLateShri P.P.Das Occupation:'Service Presentlyworking as' Additjonal Superintending Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, R/o Qtr. No. N.C. 6, CSEB New Colony, Tifra.Bilaspur, ChhattisgaFh RESRONDENTS l'..^7'> ^i^^- ^SF"' ^^^^;':.. ;\- '.<€^ y'- ^' '^^ ^"^i c ^ ^ VERSUS ^ 1. State of:Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Government of Chhattisgarh Department of Energy Mantralaya.DKS Bhawan Raipyr, Chhattisgarh 1 . • . / 2; ChtiattisgarM State Etectricity Board, Through its.Secretary • CSEB Headquarters Danganiya, Raipur.Chhattisgarh ^ 3. Ghairman . Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board Danganiya, Raipur / 4. SupeFihtending Engineer (O&M) Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh / 5.ShriA.P.Namdeo Secretary (Retired) , ChhattisgaEh State ElectricityBoard Through Secretary, CSEB Danganiya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh / 6. ShriG.L.Patel Superintending Engineer (O&M) Chhaftisgarh State Electricity Board Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh y 7. ShriA.R.Choudhary Retired Superintending Engineer (STI?E) Construction Circle, CSEB Bilaspur, Thtoygh SeGretary, CSEB .Dangahiya,Raipur,Chhattisgarh ^: 8.,ShriA,N,AgFawaj • .: Additional Chief Engineei-(Ret]red).',:.; • ehhattisgaFh.State'ElectFicityBoard"^ R/otilG (R) Bi.g6;,,:ParijatExtension,CQl0nS(gg| Ring'Road'Bilaspur, Ch-hattisgarh 1'' ,:sQ||g|S !'^sSsm WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OR WRITS IN^THE NATURE OF DIRECTION QR DIRECTIONS ORDER OR ORDERS, CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS OR THE LIKE HI6H COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHAmSSARH: BILASPUR ingle Bench: Non'bie Shri Sotish K.Agnihotri, J. W.P.(s)No. 5125 of 2006 Bablu Petitioner 6.P. Das Versus Respondents State of Ghhattisgarh & others Shri Ranbir Singh AAarhas, counset for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel lawyer for the respondent No. 1/5tate. CT?&ER (20th Septembw. 2006) 1. Lsgrned counsei appearin9 for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner wonts to withdraw tiiis petition, to which leorned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1/Stcte has no objection. 2. Consequently, ttie writ petition is dismissed as wittidrawn. No order OtStOCOStS. ___ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge &