IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 19517 of 2008 Between: 1 R.Suresh kumar S/o. Late Lingamaiah R/o. Flat No. 102, Plot No. 6-1-283, Darani Suryasai Apartments, Padma Rao Nagar, Secunderabad. 2 Smt. R.Jaya W/o. Late Ashok Kumar R/o. 8-2-399, Kummariguda, Secunderabad 3 R.L.ravi Kumar S/o. Late Lingamaiah R/o. 8-2-400, Kummariguda, Secunderabad 4 R.Ramesh kumar S/o. Late Lingamaiah R/o. 8-2-399, Kummariguda, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of A.P., Revenue Department, rep. by District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad East, Mukramjahi Market Road, Hyderabad. 3 Tahasildar Qutubullapurre Taluk, Qutbullapure, R.R.District. 4 Addagutta Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., rep. by its President ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.3 in not considering the representation dated 18-06-2008 ﬁled by the petitioners for rectiﬁcation of the wrong entries made in pahanies pertaining to land in Sy.No. 329/10, of Gajularamaram Village, Qutbullapure Taluk, R.R.District and consequently direct the respondent No. 3 to rectify the Pahanies showing our names as Pattedars and Possessors as legal heirs of Karnam Laxminarayana. Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.P.GIRI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : Order: This writ petition is ﬁled by the petitioners questioning the inaction on the part of the 3rd respondent – Tahsildar, Qutbullapur Taluk, in disposing of their representation dated 18.6.2008 seeking rectiﬁcation of the entries made in the revenue records. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue and at their request, the writ petition is taken up for ﬁnal disposal at the admission stage. Since the only grievance of the petitioners is non- consideration of their representation dated 18.6.2008 by the 3rd respondent, as agreed to by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, without going into the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioners dated 18.6.2008, seeking correction of entries in the revenue records expeditiously. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.10.9.2008 msv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Government of A.P., Revenue Department, rep. by District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad East, Mukramjahi Market Road, Hyderabad. 3 Tahasildar Qutubullapurre Taluk, Qutbullapure, R.R.District. 4 2CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad 5 2CD copies