1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 6602/2010 Ramavtar Bairwa Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 9.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Pankaj Gupta - for petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not involved in the matter. In court statement, prosecutrix has not made allegation of rape against petitioner. Hence, petitioner may be granted bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. He submits that bail application of Anandilal had been rejected by the co-ordinate Bench and case of the petitioner does not stand on better footing than Anandilal. Petitioner is also involved in the matter. Hence, he may not be 2 granted benefit of bail. After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, the bail application is dismissed. However, learned trial court may expedite trial and, if possible, conclude the same within four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma