IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10392 of 2011 Anand Kumar Versus Parmendu Priyadarshi ----------- 02. 05.07.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This application has been filed against the order dated 04.05.2011 passed by Sub Judge I, Patnacity in Title Suit No.206 of 2008 whereby the learned Court below rejected the application filed by the petitioner to recall P.W.1 and P.W.2 for cross-examining them on the point of compromise. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below found that the compromise application was not pressed by the plaintiff and it is stated that the defendant is not agreeable to the condition mentioned in the compromise application. In such view of the matter, I do not find any illegality in the impugned order and, therefore, it is not a fit case where supervisory jurisdiction should be exercised under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)