^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) CIVIL REVISION N0 . ^ /20 H^l^^ ^yii , APPLICANTS :1. Heerabai, Wd/o. Purshottam Mahra, aged about 46 years 2. Santoshi, D/o. Purshottam ^ ^ Mahra/aged about 20 years, ^O ^..3. /3. Purnima, D/o. Purshottam ,.B.»~•••.••••d^-^^!^Mahra'aged about 18 years ^^^^^f^ ^ •*.*.-<2:rt'?T<l'? ^^ Ku. Prabha, D/o. Purshottam Mahra, aged about 10 years ^^\^. ^"y }K \^^^ ]^i^ \&&/.S/1 XESPONDENTS 5. Rakshpal, S/o. Purshottam / Mahra, aged about 13 years ('" No.4 and 5 minors, through natural guardian mother Smt. Heera Bai, Wd/o. Purshottam Mahra, All R/o. Village Mahapalli, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.) (DEFENDANTS) VERSUS :1.C Preetpal Singh Vadhava, S/o. ^ Gurucharan aged about Singh Vadhava, 40 years, R/o. Kirodimal Colony, Raigarh, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.) (PLAINTIFF) State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) (DEFENDANT N0.6) CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF THECODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ^!^?T'8RT ^SW WT^RT^TWTO <' \" ^. ?/. ^ ^w<n< »*ii<(» •g-o^ •?!H?n^T, ^Tli'y'Ko, [sK'll'ay ..CA...^..J^08. ^ -^ 200 ^n^ff ^RF (^f^^) <SWI^T^%^ .SB_LHON. SHHI JUSTICB N, K. 20-10-2009 Shri Raghvendra Pradl^ Shri Prakash Tiwari. wt the non-applicant No. 1. Shi'i Sanjeev Kumar Leanied counsel for tht an, Adv. for the applicant. h Smt. Shradclha Naidu, Adv. for A^rawal judicata could only be decid^ the issue iii this regai'd aiid an application under Ordeit matter can be remitted bad issue of res judicata after fj regard. Prayer of learned co reasonable. Therefore, the mipugi: matt.er is remitted back to ti frame'pi^lmiinaiy issue on decide the same on its own n Witli these obsei-vation disposed of ^Wferq^-qp^ ^ fe^'(t^?R ^sqlroa^Sl Adv. for the State. pai'ties submit that issue of res ;d by the trial Court aiter fi'aiiilng should not have been decided ou 7 Rule 11 of C.P.C. Therefore, to tlie trial Court to decide the Taming prelimmary issue m tliis ansel for both the paities is jed order is set aside aiid the ic ti'ial Court witli a direction to |:he question of res judicata aiid lerits m accordance witii law. aiid dii'ections, tiiis revi.sion is Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge ^mi^l^^N ^Tl^? TW?f^TT^—FS/95—1 1/2008—1,00,000.