IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8933 of 2006 M/s Pratibha Foods Pvt. Ltd. Nasriganj, through its Director, Arun Kumar Mishra, S/o Shri Sheojee Mishra, R/o Pavitra Market Bailey Road, Raja Bazar, Patna-14. -------- Petitioner Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board, through its Chairman Electricity Building, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board Electric Building, Bailey Road, Patna. 3. The Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Electric Building, Bailey Road, Patna. 4. The General Manager cum Chief Engineer, Patna Electric Supply Unit, Area, Patna. 5. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Patna Electric Supply Unit, West Circle, Patna. 6. The Executive Engineer, Patna Electric Supply Division, Danapur, PESU (West) Patna. 7. The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Patna Electric Supply Division, Danapur, PESU (West), Patna. 8. The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Industries, Bihar Patna. 9. The Secretary, Department of Industries, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 10. The Director, Industries, Bihar, Patna. -------Respondents ----------- 3 13.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the Electricity Board. The only prayer in this writ application of the petitioner is for grant of certain concession/relief in payment of the electricity bills on the ground that the petitioner is a sick industry. Learned counsel for the petitioner in this context refers to certain provisions of Industrial Policy of the year 2006 issued by the Government of Bihar. 2 Learned counsel for the Board on the other hand would submit that such grievance of the petitioner can be only considered if the petitioner comes within the parameter as fixed by the Board. That being so, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to the Financial Controller-II to consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order on filing of a self contained representation by the petitioner giving details of such concession/relief being claimed by it. Let it be made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of such claim of the petitioner. With the aforementioned observations and direction, this application is disposed of. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)