Slni -ll .(- -•r.,' c r- ^-^T^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ~CZ ~ W.P. ru/A 226) N0. 1^12 /2008 PETITIONERS ^ ..-"^> A^.^ .^:> ^ ,.^^ ^..-y^ ^- '^ Vs RESPONDENTS 1. Vijay Chandrakar, son of Bahadur Chandrakar, aged about 37 years. 2.5harda Ram Chandrakar, son of Bahadur Chandrakar, aged about 35 yeors. 3. Heeraman Chandrakar/ son of Bahadur Chandrakar, aged about 33 years. All residents of Village Rakhi, Tehsil Arang, District Raipur. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Ministry of General Administration ^^:::::":.rr.: ^' Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. 2. New Raipur Development Authority, Raipur, through its Chief Executive Officer, New Raipur Development Authority, Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR WRiT PETiTION (C) N0.1913 OF 2008 ^8 PetltiQner VijayChandrakar Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Another WRIT PETiTiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Vivek Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 21st day ofJuly, 2010) I.A.No.3 This is an application for withdrawal of the petition with a prayer that, if the grievance stiil survives, the petitioner may be granted tiberty to take recourseto appropriate forum. Learned counselappearing for otherside has no objection. Appiication is ordered as prayed for. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated iiberty. SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ashok