IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS MONDAY, THE 6TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 15TH BHADRA 1932 WP(Crl.).No. 203 of 2010(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- LEELA, AGED 37, W/O. SEBASTIAN, JYOTHI VIHAR, OPP. ANNA TRADERS, OTTAPANAVILA, UCHAKKADA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.PRADEEP RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE HOME SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POOVAR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POZHILIYOOR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. JINS, S/O. CHOODAN APPU, AGED ABOUT 24, NELLUVILA VEEDU, UCHAKKADA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. SHEEJU, S/O. SAKTHI NADAR, AGED ABOUT 25, OTTAPANA VEEDU, UCHAKKADA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. DHANUSH, S/O. DAS, AGED ABOUT 22, OTTAPANA VEEDU, UCHAKKADA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADDL.R7.SELVANATHAN, S/O.DEVADAS, MATHA KOVIL STREET, ARANGAKODI NAGAPATINAM, TAMILNADU ADDL. R7 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DT.14.7.2010 IN IA.NO.9462/2010. IN W.P.(CRL) 203/2010. G.P. SHRI. K J MOHAMMED ANZAR, R1-3 ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP FOR R-4 SRI.V.VIJULAL FOR R-4 GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS JJ., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (Crl.)No.203 of 2010 S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 6th day of September, 2010. JUDGMENT Basant J., This judgment must be read in continuation of the earlier orders passed resting with the order dated 3.8.2010. 2. Today when the case is called, the petitioner is represented by her counsel. The learned Government Pleader after taking instructions informs us that the alleged detenue and the 7th respondent are now residing together. Though it was directed by the police and agreed by them that the alleged detenue and the 7th respondent shall appear before the Court in person, they have not complied with the undertaking given by them on account of financial difficulties, submits the learned Government Pleader. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to seek any further relief now. According to the petitioner, the alleged detenue, who was residing along with her as per the court order, has now become a major and has chosen to go with the 7th respondent and is residing with W.P. (Crl.)No.203 of 2010 S 2 him. In these circumstances, no further directions are necessary, submits the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. This submission was made on the last date of posting also. But the alleged detenue has been sent by this court along with the petitioner as per order dated 6.7.2010. We deemed it necessary that the personal presence of the alleged detenue must be ensured and insisted. Today also the alleged detenue is not present. We accept the statement of the learned Government Pleader, who submits after taking instructions from respondents 1 to 3, that the alleged detenue is now residing with the 7th respondent in Tamil Nadu. 4. We are, in these circumstances, satisfied that the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no orders are necessary in this Writ Petition now and request to close the proceedings can be accepted. Request is accepted. This Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. R. BASANT, JUDGE M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE dl/