IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Appeal No.4 of 2003 Decided on : December 20, 2010 State of H.P. …Appellant. Versus Kewal Ram Chauhan and others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Appellant : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General. For the Respondents : M/s Ajay Kochhar, Vivek Sharma & S.S. Rathore, Advocates. Surjit Singh, Judge(Oral) In view of acceptance of appeals against conviction, filed by some of the accused, who have been convicted and sentenced, setting aside of the judgment and remanding of the case to the trial Court, with a direction to examine the accused, under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and to decide the cases afresh thereafter, the present appeal, arising out of that very judgment, filed by the State for enhancement of sentence, is also accepted and the case is remanded to the trial Court, in terms of the judgment, delivered in Criminal Appeal No.202 of 2002, titled as Nand Ram and others versus State of H.P. and two other connected appeals. Appeal stands disposed of. Parties are directed to appear before the trial Court on 6th January, 2011. December 20, 2010(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J. Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?