IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16034 of 2010 Deo Nandan Ravi Das Son of Late Mangal Ravi Das, At + P.O. Belchhi, P.S. Belchhi, District Patna Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Secretary Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes, Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. The Secretary, Bihar State Co-operative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Registrar, Bihar State Co-operative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 4. The Bihar State Scheduled Caste Co-operative Development Co- operation Limited, through its Managing Director, Malyanil Bhawan, Budha Colony, Patna 5. The District Executive Officer, Saran Chhapra Bihar State Scheduled Cast Co-operative Development Corporation Limited. 03/ 27.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the Office Order No. 7 dated 8.7.2009, Annexure-1, passed by Respondent no. 5, whereunder he has been directed to superannuate on attaining the age of 58 years with effect from 31.7.2009. 3. Counsel for the petitioner assails the order dated 8.7.2009, Annexure-1 on the ground that the Bihar State Scheduled Caste Co-operative Development Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation) adopted Bihar Service Code in the year 1979 which, inter alia, was amended by the State Government under Resolution dated 24.3.2005 extending the retirement age from 58 to 60 years and according to the learned counsel for the petitioner the - 2 - retirement age of the employees of the Corporation should be 60 years and not 58 years with effect from 24.3.2005. 4. I regret not to accept such submission in view of the fact that the Corporation has not taken any decision to extend the retirement age of its employees from 58 years to 60 years in the light of the Resolution of the State Government amending Rule 73 of the Bihar Service Code and appreciating the aforesaid aspect of the matter, this Court has already dismissed other writ petitions raising similar issue under order dated 9.9.2010, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14812 of 2010 and for the reasons indicated in the said order, this writ petition is also dismissed. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)