IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 186 OF 2008 Padmashali Shikshan Sanstha & Anr. ...Petitioners. v. Shri Vidyadhar Jagtap & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.I.M.Khairdi, adv. For the Petitioners. Mr. Nitin Jamdar, adv. For the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.A.I.I.Patel, AGP for the Respondent No.3. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : APRIL 22, 2010 P.C. 1 Petition was filed alleging that the education officer had not complied with the directions given by this Court on 30th April, 2008 in Writ Petition No.361/2008 to consider the proposal within a period of two weeks from the date of the order. Petition was filed on 4th June, 2008. The learned counsel for the parties admit that the Education Officer had infact complied with the said order on 11.7.2008, i.e., even before the notice in this matter was received. It appears that there was some delay but the order has been complied. Therefore, in my considered opinion, no purpose will be served in proceeding further with contempt petition. – 2 - 2 Contempt Petition stands dismissed accordingly. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)