IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR (C.G.) M.A. fCI N0. ^£ /2009 •-, ^1'^???*'! . APPELLANT Pratima Netgm, aged about 28 years, W/o. Ratan Lal Netam, Caste-Gond, R/o. Village-Chawardhal, Post Marun Khurd, P.S. Ghumka, Tahsil and District Rajnandgaon, at present Bohardih, P.S.- Utai, Tahsil-Patan, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^^, ^st:'" \:--"^\"^-;' ;1. 2. ^ e>€ A'? 3. 4. Mohd. Asraf, aged about 20 years, S/o. Mohd. Asgar Khan __„ -— Mohd. Asgar, aged abqyt^60 years, S/o. Late Usman Khanl>^7o. Arjun Nagar, Camp-1, Bhilai, P.S. Chhawani, Tahsil and District (C.G.) United India Insurance Company Limited, Through : Divisional Office, Divisional Manager, Mahendra Complex, Kachhari Road, Raipur and Branch Office, Branch Manager, Tara Complex, G.E. Road, Bhilai, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.) Alakh Ram Thakur,aged about 478 years, S/o. Jivrakhan Ram, Caste- Gond, R/o. Village-Pauwara, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.) CLAIM BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL : AWARD AMOUNT , VALUATION OF THE PRESENT APPEAL: Rs.6,65,000/- Rs. 50,000/- Rs.6,15,000/- ro MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL U/S. 173_QETHE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT. 1988 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISIONBENCH CORAM: Appellant HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON'BLE SHR1 SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. MA(ClNo.866of2009 Pratima Netam, aged about 28 years, W/o Ratan Lal Netam, Caste - Gond, R/o Village - Chawardhal, Post Mamn Khurd, PS Ghumka, Tahsil and District, Rajnandgaon, at present Bohardih, PS Utai, Tahsil - Patan, District Durg (CG) Respondents VERSUS Mohd Asraf, aged about 20 yeare, S/o Mohd Asgar Khan Mohd Asgar, aged about 60 yeare, S/o Late Usman Khan Both R/o Arjun Nagar, Camp - 1, Bhilai PS Chhawani, Tahsil and District Durg (CG) United India Insurance Company Limited Through : Divisional Office, Divisional Wanager, Mahendra Complex, Kachhari Road, Raipur and Branch Office, Branch Manager, Tara Complex, GE Road, Bhilai, Tahsil and Distrtet Durg (CG) Alakh Ram Thakur, aged about 47 years, S/o Jivrakhan Ram, Caste - Gond, R/o Village - Pauwara, Tahsil and District Durg (CG) Miscellaneous Appeal U/S 173 ofthe Motor VehiclesAct. 1988 Present: Shri Goutam Khetrapal , counsel for the appellant. Order (26th June, 2009) The following order of the Court was pass«J by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. /£^1"\ j!*k -k. .f / '^^ ^ ^i^" Shri Goutam Khetrapal, leamed counsel for the appellant seeks permisslon to withdraw the appeal flled by the appellant for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Ninth Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Durg, vide award dated 25.02.20C®,passed in Claim Case No.08/2008, with the liberty of filing cross-objections for enhaneement of the compensation in the appeal of the owner/insurer of the offendir^ vehicle. 2) Permission granted. 3) With the above liberty, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. N, : Sd'- Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha ChiefJiistice Judge subbu