CR No. 6503 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 6503 of 2008 Decided on : 26-11-2008 Dev Raj alias Pappi ....Petitioner VERSUS Jai Kishan and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for the petitioner. MAHESH GROVER, J This revision petition is directed against the order dated 11.11.2008 by which the prayer of the petitioner for adducing additional evidence by invoking the provisions of Order 18 Rule 17 A CPC has been declined. The petitioner is a tenant who is facing ejectment proceedings since 2002. The evidence of the respondent-landlord was concluded in the year 2003. The petitioner himself concluded his evidence in the year 2004. Ejectment of the petitioner is sought on the ground of sub-letting. It has been pleaded by the respondent-landlord that the petitioner shifted his business elsewhere. The petitioner now contends before this Court that in fact premises where he is alleged to have shifted belongs to his wife and his wife has sold the same and this fact is necessary for proper adjudication of the matter. CR No. 6503 of 2008 2 The allegation of shifting his business to a shop other than the demised premises is existing right from the beginning. It has to be viewed independently of any other factor. The fact that the petitioner or his wife has sold some property in the year 2006 does not has any bearing on the aspect of the sub-letting which is alleged by the respondent-landlord. There is no reason to allow his prayer and particularly when there is no infirmity in the impugned order. Dismissed. November 26, 2008 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge