1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 759 of 2011 Smt. Leena Singh W/o Umesh Veer Vikram Singh R/o 162, Civil Lines, Meerut (U.P.) …..…Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary, Ministry of Home, Sachivalaya Annexee, Dehradun 2. Director General, Uttarakhand Police, Police Headquarter, Dehradun 3. Senior Superintendent of Police, District Dehradun 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Dalanwala Dehradun 5. Devendra Singh Yadav, S/o Shri Sadhuram, R/o Village Kutubpur Kusani Post Nivada Sivay, District Saharanpur ……….Respondents Mr. Umesh Veer Vikram Singh, Advocate, with Mr. M.S. Bisht, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Mr. T.C. Aggarawal, Addl. G.A., present for the State. Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. 2. By means of this writ petition moved under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the 2 petitioner has sought direction that the investigation of crime no. 116 of 2011, relating to offences punishable under section 420, 406, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Dalanwala, District Dehradun, be transferred to Central Bureau of Investigation. 3. The allegations in the First Information Report are that the complainant, and his wife were cheated of ` 5,10,000/- by the accused by promising to provide Government job. It is also alleged that other persons were also cheated by the three accused named in the FIR including the petitioner. Earlier also a writ petition no. 631 of 2011, was filed by the accused for quashing of the FIR, which was dismissed by this Court vide its order dated 28.07.2011. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent, and false allegations have been made by the dismissed employee of the petitioner's organization, in the FIR in connivance of the State Police. The factual pleas of innocence cannot be examined by this Court in its writ jurisdiction. However, having considered submissions of learned counsel for the 3 parties, and after going through the papers on record, this Court does not find any sufficient reason to transfer the investigation of the case at this stage. 5. Therefore, without expressing any opinion as to final merits in the matter, the writ petition is dismissed summarily. (Stay application no. 9130 of 2011, stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Parul 12.09.2011