IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2080 of 2006 BISHUNDEO MAHTO Versus MUKESH KUMAR KAPUR & ORS ----------- 3. 15.9.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. The amount of compensation is for the whole family and therefore, if the court below has tried to protect them by referring to and relying on the principles decided by this Court in the case of Rambilas Mahto vs. Mahabir Mahto & ors., reported in 1996(2) PLJR 127, no exception can be made against such impugned order. It is however clarified that in case the widow of the deceased, the mother of grand-daughter of the petitioner, furnishes sufficient proof of requirement of money for the marriage of her daughter i.e. grand-daughter of the petitioner before the court below, it will allow only withdrawal of a reasonable amount sufficient for expenses to be incurred for such marriage because out of the said amount the entire family has to survive and therefore, prayer 2 for withdrawal of entire amount at one go only for the benefit of one of the family cannot be allowed. The court below, therefore, will pass an appropriate order at the appropriate stage if it is made to be believed only the bonafide requirement of such amount. With the aforementioned observation, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/