WP(C) 1539/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. BARUAH Heard Mr. A.Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. P. Chakrabort y, learned standing counsel, Social Welfare Department who accepts notice on beh alf of respondents 1 to 3. The respondent authorities taking note of the office order dated 21/12/2010 and reply thereto by order dated 11/1/2011 directed the petitioner to shift her orig inal place with immediate effect. Being aggrieved by the said order, the petitio ner has approached this Court to issue a direction to the respondent authority(s ) to dispose of her representation (Annexure-H) submitted on 9/12/2011 with the Deputy Commissioner, Darrang, Mangaldai in particular. It is contended in the wr it petition that on account of issuance of such order (Annexure-E) directing her to shift to the original place, the petitioner filed representation (Annexure-H ) dated 9/12/2010. It is the case of the petitioner that despite submission of t he representation, the same is not taken care of by the respondent No.3 and is s itting tight over the matter. Mr. A. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of direct ion made vide letter dated 11/1/2011, the petitioner’s representation requires d isposal by the respondent authority(s). In view of the contention passed in the writ petition and in view of the filing of the representation (Annexure-H) by the petitioner, this Court finds no impedi ment but to issue direction to the respondent authority to disposed of the repre sentation (Annexure-H) within a period of one month. For the purpose, the petitioner is directed to submit a copy of this order along with the copy of the representation and the writ petition to the respondent aut hority(s) so as to enable them to take appropriate decision. With the above directions, writ petition stands disposed of.