: 1 : wp-10348-10=.doc USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10348 OF 2010 Dr. Gunjeet Kaur Pasricha .. Petitioner v/s. The Registrar, University of Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents ......... Mr. C.K. Thomas i/b C.K. Thomas & Associates for the petitioner Mr. R.A. Rodrigues for respondent no.1 Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP for respondent no.3 ......... CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATE : 5th AUGUST, 2011. P.C. : 1. After hearing Counsel for the parties, in deference to the observation made by the Court, the Counsel for the petitioner in all fairness submitted that petitioner would first exhaust the remedy before the Grievance Committee of the University, which is a statutory body. It is agreed between the parties that the issues raised in the present petition can be conveniently answered by the Grievance Committee. Accordingly, instead of examining the grievance of the petitioner directly in exercise of writ jurisdiction, we may permit the petitioner to withdraw this petition so as to pursue the matter before : 2 : wp-10348-10=.doc the Grievance Committee. 2. We have no manner of doubt that the Grievance Committee will consider all issues raised by the petitioner on its own merits, after giving opportunity to all concerned and record reasons for rejection or acceptance of the contention to be raised by the petitioner so that if any party is aggrieved, would be free to challenge the said decision of the Grievance Committee by way of appropriate proceedings. All questions are left open. 3. Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed, for the reasons recorded hereinbefore. (R.Y.GANOO, J.) (A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)