WP. (C) No. 105/2011 PETITIONERS 1. g‘ RESPONDENTS 1. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Vivek Bisen, S/o Shri J.P. Bisen. aged about 27 years, R/o CSEB Colony, Tifra, Bilaspur, District. Bilaspur (C.G.) Saurabh Tyagi, S/o Shri M.K. Tyagi. aged about 26 years, R/o Flat No. 503, Ekta Endave, Raipur, District— Raipur (C.G.) Kunal Paul, S/o Shri KR. Paui, aged about 27 years, R/o Avanti Vihar, Mowa, Raipur, District- Raipur (C,G.) Nazia Begum, D/o Mohd. Hushain, aged about 27 years, R/o QNo. 7C, Street 32, Sector 8, Bhiiai Nagar, District- Durg (C.G.) Kunjbihari Tarak, S/o Shri DR. Tarak, Aged about 28 years, R/o Tarak Computers, Ful ChoWk, Lalita Chowk Road, Raipur, District— Raipur (C.G.) Ku. Nikita Minz, D/o Shri Nickolas Minz, aged about 27 years, R/o Jawahar Nagar, Nayapara, Rambhata, Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chattisgarh, through Secretary Department of Medication Education. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Secretary, Department of Health Services, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Director, Health Services Directorate Health Services, Raipur (C.G.) Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru Memorial Medical College, Raipur, Through the Dean, Raipur (C.G.) ,(C.G.) Director, Medical Education Directorate Medication Education, Raipur (C.G.) 2 W.P. (C) NO. 105/2011 f) k4 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (15.02201 1) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA,J. Heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for the parties. “w Mr. Prateek Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the petitioners appeared in the pre medical test (PMT) in the year 2002. After selection they were given .admission in MBBS Course in respondent No. 5 Coiiege. Petitioners 1 to 4 were directed to fu'rnish bank guarantee of Rs. 75,000/u and petitioners 5 & 6 were directed to furnish bank guarantee of Rs. 40,000/— for the period from 15‘“/18“‘ or March, 2006 to 31.03.2010 for the reason that after obtaining the MBBS Degree, they will serve in the Rural Areas of Chhattisgarh State. Accordingly, all the petitioners furnished the bank guarantee. After completion of their MBBS courses, the names of the petitioners were sent for giving appointment, but the concerned respondents did not issue appointment letters in favour of the petitioners and a long time elapsed. Thereafter, the bank guarantees were encashed by respondent no. 5 and presently, the amount(s) in question are pending with respondent No.5. Mr. Prateek Sharma submits that in similar writ petitions i.e. W.P.(C) No. 1986/2010 & W.P.(C) No. 2731/2007, orders have been passed that the petitioners are entitled to principle amount as also interest @ 6% per annum subject to,verification of facts. He submits that the present writ petition may also be disposed of in terms of the orders of above 2 writ petitions. Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned panel lawyer appearing on behalf of the State, fairly agrees that the issue involved in this writ petition is covered by the two r. “orders passed by this Court in the above 2 writ petitions and the present writ petition can be disposed of in terms of the orders passed in the said writ petitions. In view of the above agreed submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is finally disposed of in terms of the orders passed in W.P.(C) 2731/2007 on 04.09.09 & W.P.(C) 1986/2010 on 01.07.2010. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge No order as to costs. Rahul w