IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42540 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Manoj Singh @ Mukesh Kumar 2. Mukesh Singh @ Mukesh Kumar .... .... Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== 2 14-12-2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 379 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner is that on expiry of the lease, structure with regard to the crusher machine were removed by the informant but the crusher machines and other articles were left on the spot but subsequently, it was found that the petitioner was running the crusher machine. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the seizure list was not served on the petitioner as nothing was found around crusher machine nor any detail of any structure was given in the seizure nor it contains the signature of petitioner and his any employee. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Muffassil P.S. Case No. 223/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Amrendra Kumar/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)