1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.742 OF 2007 Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Anil Nagpal & Anr. ...Respondents. .... Mr. Nikhil Mehta i/b. Disha Karambar for the Petitioner. Mr. Mubin Solkar for Respondent No.1. Mr. I. A. Bagaria for Respondent No.2. ..... CORAM :DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. January 31, 2008. P.C.: At the hearing of the Arbitration Petition, Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Counsel appearing for the Respondents are agreed that the following order may be passed in these proceedings under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, without further recording any reasons: (1) Within a period of three weeks from today, the Respondents shall jointly furnish security to the satisfaction of the Prothonotary & Senior Master to cover the claim that has been 2 preferred by the Petitioner against the Respondents in the arbitral proceedings; (2) The Petitioner agrees to furnish to the Respondents true copies of the six loan accounts of the Respondents within a period of two weeks from today; (3) The aforesaid order is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties in the arbitral proceedings. No other point is pressed on either side. The Arbitration Petition is accordingly disposed of. ......