IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12308 of 2009 MOST.KANTA MANDAL WIFE OF LATE AMBIKA PD. MANDAL, EX. CIRCLE INSPECTOR RESIDENT OF MOHALLA SACHIDA NAND NAGAR SOUTH OF AIRODRUM, P.O. + P.S. TILKA MANJHI, DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPTT. OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, BHAGALPUR 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BHAGALPUR 4. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, NATH NAGAR DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, NATH NAGAR, DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR 6. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, SANHOLA, BHAGALPUR 7. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA 8. THE PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, BHAGALPUR 9. THE TREASURY OFFICER, BHAGALPUR ----------- 5 10.02.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon the death of her husband on 13th September, 2008 in harness while working as Circle Inspector under circle Sanhola, District-Bhagalpur, the pensionary benefits have not been settled as yet. The petitioner has been sanctioned only the provisional family pension and has been paid the part amount of the Group Insurance. As regards other claims on account of the leave encashment and provident fund dues have remained to be settled besides giving effect to the assured career progression allowed in favour of the petitioner by making the payment of the arrears as also revision of the family pension. Learned counsel for the State submits that the claims which have remained to be settled as yet shall be considered without delay as per law and the admissible dues shall also be paid. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his claims, as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the District Magistrate, Bhagalpur (respondent no.3). In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating distinctly the details of all the unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents in support of the claim, the respondent no. 3 shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and admitted dues along with statutory interest could also be paid to the petitioner. However, if any of the claims or part of the claim is found not admissible, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with sufficient reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)