HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Msc. Appeal Uls 3O of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 Presentf Shri Pravin Das, counsel forthe appellant. Shri S.P.Kale, counsel for respondent No.1 ORAL ORDER (Passed on 15“ of January, 2008) Heard on admission. It is not disputed that the compensation awarded by the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation, Labour Court, Bilaspur in Case No.2NVCA/99{NF} Claim has been disbursed to the respondent No.1 and that the respondent No.1 has superannuated from service on 01-01-2004. It is also not disputed that the , appellant had sentthe respondent No.1 fortreatment at K.E.M. Hospital, Bombay where rods were implanted in both the legs of respondent No.1 during knee replacement operation. lt is also not disputed that the respondent No.1 :was employed as Loader with the appellant. Having considered the undisputed facts mentioned abdve, I have perused the record and the impugned award. l am of the considered opinion, in view of the para 13 of the impugned M v judgmentLthe finding recorded by the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation, Labour Court, Bilaspur that the respondent No.1 had sustained disability due to accident arising out of and in the course of employment, is impeccable. ln this view 'of the matter, no substantial question of law arises for determination in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed at the stage of \ admission. ‘t ~ M.(C.)P.No.355/2004 for grant of stay stands disposed of. \ 96" “a“ \ ow? «““v e9“ o9¢ Tumane / \ Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. M.A.No. 263 of 2004 E Appellant South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. through: Sub- Non-Applicant Area Manager, Banki, PO. Banki — Mongra. Dist. Korba. versus Respondents 1. Ram Charan Burman, S/o Lahru Burman, Applicants Aged about 60 years, Loader, SECL, Banki, R/o Vill. Barbhata, PO Salkhan, Dist. Janjgir—Champa. 2.’ Commissioner Under the Workmen's y ‘ Compensation Act, Bilaspur.