IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 21ST KARTHIKA 1930 OP.No. 13705 of 2001(F) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- NISSAM.E., AGED 33 YEARS S/O IBRAHIM KUNJILAPPA, PULIMOOTTU VEEDU, MASTHANMUKKU, KANIYAPURAM.P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SMT.DAISY THAMBI RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE GENERAL MANAGER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REGIONAL CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS, UNION LTD. PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M.R.BABU SRI.K.ANAND (A.201) FOR R3 SMT.LATHA KRISHNAN FOR R3 THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/11/2008, THE COURT ON 12/11/2008 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OP.No. 13705 of 2001(F) C.M.P. NO. 21845 OF 2001 IN O.P. NO. 13705 PETITION FOR DIRECTION DISMISSED SD/- S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE 12.11.2008. APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 - A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE MEDICAL BOARD ON 10.2.1997. EXT.P2 - A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF APPOINTMENT NO. TD/PER/57/92/VOL.VIII/ 1471 DATED 7.5.98. EXT.P3 - A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 29.8.1998. EXT.P4 - A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 28.9.1998. EXT.P5 - A TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(P) NO. 18/99/P& ARD DATED 13.10.1999 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P6 - A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. EM 10912/B2/98 DATED 14.10.1999. EXT.P7 - A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON 26.10.1999. EXT.P8 - A TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM NO. P&E/PD/II/997/RECT. EE/C1/2736/2000-01 DATED 1.9.2000 ISSUED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER OF THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. EXT.P9 - A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 6.3.2001. /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE rhs S.SIRI JAGAN, J ================== O.P.No.13705 of 2001 ================== Dated this the 12th day of November, 2008. J U D G M E N T This original petition came up for hearing in the hearing list in the week commencing from 10.11.2008 and the same was taken up for hearing on 11.11.2008. When the case was called neither the petitioner nor the counsel was present. Therefore the same was adjourned to today. Today also when the case was called none appears for the petitioner. The petitioner is also absent. In the above circumstances, the original petition is dismissed for default. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs