IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARI-AT BILASPUR C.G. u 3‘ ' w.P.(C) No... ?;30 .../2009 ’ETITIONER: , / K.D.College of Education ' i ‘ Run by Kanti Darshan‘Shaikshanik v) f. ‘8 Evam Computer Sansthan, Kanti / 9"gf<§ _ Darshan Parisar, Through its ‘ % " P sid t, Ram sh Kumar .. .gwsw/w en e _ $o‘:ew‘&>€§/ ' Shnvastava Kosa Nagar (Nehru‘ .® ~ ’ Nagar) Bhilai,District Durg (C.G.), . ‘ VERSUS SPONDE/NTS: ‘ /l. _ State of Chhattisgarh kg ' L Through the Secretary, , ~ Department of School EduCahon, . DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Ralpur (C.G.) ’ L /" 2. _ State Council for Educational . Research & Training, through the Director, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) / 3.‘ PtRavishankar Shukla University ‘ Through the Registrar Raipur (C.G.) ‘ LI’ET‘ITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTI‘ON' OF INDIA /FOR‘ ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS - 1. PARTICULARS QF THE PETITIONER: ‘ As stated above in the cause‘titleaf . f V @ M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION 1C1 No. 7280 of2009 PETITIONE'R : K‘D.COHege ofEducation. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. égnihog‘ J. Present: Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondem No. l & 2. Shn' Jitendra Pali, Advocate for the petitioner. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 23‘ day 0f Jgne, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that with the passage of time, this petition has become inii’uctuous. Leamed counsel appearing for other side does not controvert the above submission. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infi‘uctuous. Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotri" Judge 4 ; \