IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11416 of 2010 ASHA DEVI, S/0 Ram Nandan Prasad, resident of Nawaghari, P.O. Chandchaura, P.S. Civil Line Gaya, District- Gaya, represented through Ram Nandan Prasad, the power of Attorney holder, son of late Govind Prasad, resident of Nawaghari, P.S. Civil Line, Gaya, District- Gaya. … Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA , Gaya Bazar Branch through the Branch Manager, G.B. Road, Gaya, District- Gaya. 2. The authorized officer State Bank of India, Gaya Bazar, G.B. Road, Gaya, District Gaya. …. Respondents. ----------- 2. 23.7.2010 The petitioner has already filed an appeal before the D.R.T. against the notice under Section 13 (4) of the SARFAESI Act. Certain interim protection was also granted to the petitioner but it appears that the petitioner’s submission in that regard was misconceived, as the direction was that he may approach the Bank for compromise under the OTS Scheme, 2010, whereas learned counsel for the Bank submits that O.T.S. Scheme, 2010 does not cover housing loan, which is the case of the petitioner. In the above circumstances since the matter is already pending before the D.R.T., this Court does not consider it a fit case to issue any direction in the writ petition. It is, accordingly, dismissed. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )