1 arbp592.10.sxw ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 592 OF 2010 Upendra Purshottam Sathe. .. Petitioner versus Shaila Manohar Sathe. .. Respondent. Mr. D.S.Sabnis, advocate for petitioner. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 14TH FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C. 1 On the last occasion, it was stated that the sole petitioner has expired but the Petitioner’s advocate was absent and therefore the matter was adjourned till today. The Petitioner’s advocate states that the heirs and legal representative of the Petitioner are trying to arrive at workable settlement with the respondent. No orders can be passed on the Petition, which stands abated and dismissed as such on the death of the sole Petitioner. It is for the heirs and legal representatives to take steps for reviving the proceedings. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)