1 33 wp.2327.10 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2327 OF 2010 Abdul Sattar Abdul Aziz Khan and anr. ... Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ... Respondents ----- Mr. Akhilesh Upadhyay for the Petitioner. Mr. J.P.Yagnik, APP for the State. ----- CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and U.D. SALVI, JJ. DATE : 13 th September, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2 The grievance of the Petitioners is that the concerned Police Officer had connived with the accused named by the Petitioner in relation to FIR No. 82 of 2010. According to the Petitioners, the offence registered against the Petitioners vide FIR No. 80 of 2010 is a counter blast and in fact the Petitioners have been falsely implicated. These are the matters which will have to be tested before the trial Court. The defence of the Petitioners cannot be the basis for quashing of the FIR. We do not find any force in the submission of the Petitioners that the FIR 2 33 wp.2327.10 registered against the Petitioners should be quashed on the ground that it is abuse of process. In the circumstances, petition is dismissed. 3 Insofar as prayer clauses (b) and (c) are concerned, we keep all the contentions with regard to the said prayers open for consideration in appropriate proceedings to be resorted to by the Petitioners, if so advised. We are not inclined to examine the said contentions in the present petition in which the principal relief is for quashing of FIR registered against the Petitioners. Ordered accordingly. [ U.D. SALVI, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]