IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41413 of 2010 MD.RAHMATULLAH SIDDQUE . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 03/ 26th March 2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has prayed for anticipatory bail in a case which was initially under Section 307 and other Sections of the IPC against 13 named persons. Subsequently, injured Shashi Kuer died and Section 302 IPC has been added. On the basis of Annexure-6 order passed in Cr.Revision No. 167/2010 on 09.10.2010 by Additional Sessions Court, Sitamarhi it has been submitted that Revisional Court has found action of the police to be illegal and improper in substituting the name of the petitioner with that of his father in place of name of one Haji Guddu S/O Md. Isha. It has been submitted that witnesses have named only Guddu Haji in course of investigation and not the petitioner in view of the revisional order. In the facts of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within six 2 weeks, let the petitioner, MD.RAHMATULLAH SIDDQUE be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, Distt-Sitamarhi in Bajpatti P.S. Case No. 108/2010, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)