CWP No.989 of 2007. 20.03.2008 Present: Mr. R.S. Chandel, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. According to the petitioner, she was appointed by the Parent- Teacher Association as Teacher on 31st May, 2006. Thereafter, since she was not allowed to continue, she has approached this Court with a prayer that the petitioner be allowed to continue to work as Drawing Teacher in Government Middle School, Gaglot. Learned Counsel further relies upon order contained in Annexure P-1 and submits that the said order is her appointment letter. It is admitted case of the parties that the appointment letter of a Teacher is issued by the President of the Parent-Teacher Association. However, we find that this alleged appointment letter has been signed by the Pradhan, Gram Panchayat and it is not issued by the President of the Parent-Teacher Association. Therefore, the foundation of the appointment letter is bad in law and without jurisdiction. The petitioner has approached this Court after more than one year of the alleged appointment letter. Since the appointment letter has not been issued by the appointing authority it cannot be the appointment letter in the eyes of law. No interference is warranted in this writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed. CMP No.1660 of 2007. In view of the dismissal of the writ petition this application is also dismissed. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. March 20, 2008. ( V.K. Ahuja ), J. (rc)