IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25444 of 2010 OM PRAKASH SINGH @ O.P.SINGH, S/o Vijay Bahadur Singh. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 28.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 379, 411 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the arms of the Police Constable were recovered from the possession of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it within a reasonable time. It is surprising that no case under the Arms Act was instituted in the facts of the case. Let this order be sent to the S.P. Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 204 of 2010 to consider the First Information Report and as to whether any offence under the Arms Act also would be made out against the petitioner. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)