¥ -6 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. Applicants Appellants/ Claimants WICCNo.300of2011 1 Santu Ram, S/o Ganpat Vishwakarma, aged about 43 years 2 Smt Sushila Bai, W/o Santu Ram, aged about 50 years Both R/o village - Mudhipar, Near the Railway Station, Police Station - Somni, Tehsil & District Rajnandgaon (CG) VERSUS Non-apDlicants 1. Bhairav Prasad, S/o Ramcharan Respondents Gupta, aged about 38 years, Village Mudhipar, Near the Railway Station, Police Station - Somni, Tehsil & District - Rajnandgaon (CG) 2. Smt Bhagwati Devi, W/o Ramcharan Gupta, aged about 70 years, Village Mudhipar, Near the Railway Station, Police Station - Somni, Tehsil & District - Rajnandgaon (CG) 3. The United India Insurance Company Limited, through Branch manager, Branch Office, Kamthi LinCt Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon (CG) •t- A^plications for restoration of Wlisc Appeal (C) No.60/2006 Present: Shri Yogesh Pandey, counsel for the petitioners. l<1ff.^?- ORDER (13th June, 2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri Yogesh Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners is heard on the restoration petition. 2) The petitioners are seeking restoration of M.A.C.No.60 of 2006, which came to be dismissed for want of prosecution vide orderdated 08.04.2011. 3) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, we are satisfied that the absence of the petitioners'/appellants' counsel on 08.04.2011, when M.A.C.No.60 of 2006 was taken-up for hearing, was based on bona fide grounds. 4). M.C.C.No.300 of 2011, therefore, is allowed and M.A.C.No.60 of 2006 is restored to its original number. Sd/- Chief Justice subbu Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge