HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (227) No.31 98 of 201 O PETITIONER: Non—applicant Mukesh Kumar Pipariya, S/o Khomnath Pipariya, aged about 37 years, R/o Qr. No.6-B, Street No.4, Sector-2. Bhilai, District Durg(CG) -Versus- RESPONDENT: Appiicant Smt. Vaishaii, W/o Mukesh‘ Kumar Pipariya, aged about 33 years, R/o C/o Lav Kush Deshmukh, village Birejhar, PS Thanaud (Anjora), District Durg (CG) Present: Shri H.S. Patel with Shri Varunendra Mishra, counsel for the petitioner. ’ (7-2010) . The petitiner filed dice etition gainst the resndent and the same wa diissed by amil Court and an order of perannt alimony at the ate of Rs.3,500/— per mnth was passed in favour f the respondent wife. h petitioner’s appeal nst he final judgment and ecree passed by the Family Cour s n further dismised y this Cot vide order ated 1‘“ ovembe, 00. ln a execution proceedi nitiated by the rndent wife, the petior moved an objection and stated that mainance payable o the ndent per interim order assed by this Cou in F(M) No.24/2007 hould b calculated at the rat of Rs.2,500/— per onth and not as per rder o he Family Court and te aforesai objection has been rejected ugned order. . Since Frst ppea preferre the etitioner herein has already been ect by this ourt and th order of the Family Court has een upheld, qestion payment of perent alimony at the te of Rs.2,500/- per mnt i o a no r Th mm o a vor p a po s sm the Fy me r o o Te agai t d t ha bee s b ur d 2 Nr 29 n ng i espo tine nte t respo as' p rt A s e e m o f t h d by the imp i Al d by p rejed C e b u of man ra oh as per interm rder dted 25-6-2007 does t aise. . e trial Court has not coitted any illegality, infirmity or jurisdictional error in passing the impugned order warranting interference of this Court Barve Sinqle Bench: Honble Shri Dhirendra Mishra, J. ORAL ORDER 5— under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia , The petition is accordingly dismissed. Sit/- j l Dhirendra Mishraj : l Judge M W Vi Vii L'4::3:,::