IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9287 of 2011 SANJAY KUMAR SINGH Versus GOVIND SINGH ----------- 02. 21.06.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed against the order dated 15.04.2011 passed by Munsif, Aurangabad in Eviction Suit No.3 of 2006 whereby the learned Court below has directed the petitioner to deposit the arrears of rent from December 2006 to March 2011 amounting to Rs.26,000 in Nazarat in two installments within a period of two months and has further directed that the current rent of Rs.500 shall be deposited each and every month on 15th day. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in fact, he is not tenant under the plaintiff rather he is tenant under one Rajnath Singh. Admittedly, Rajnath Singh is not party to this Eviction Suit. The learned Court below by the impugned order has directed that after deposit, the plaintiff will not withdraw the amount deposited by the defendant. In my opinion, this order passed by the learned Court below is well within four corners of Section 15 of the B.B.C.J. Act. Accordingly, it is not a case where supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to be exercised. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Saurabh ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)