spb/- 1 wp433-2000.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 433 OF 2000 Arvind Dattatraya Sapkal ... Petitioner Vs. Shri Gulabrao Tukaram Bhosale & Ors. ... Respondents. --- None present for the Petitioner. Mr. Umashankar Upadhaya i/by S.N.Chandrachood for Respondent No.1. ----- CORAM : D. G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 07th JANUARY, 2011. P.C. 1 None present for the petitioner. 2 The matter was called for hearing on 5th January, 2011, when a request was made on behalf of the petitioner to postpone the hearing for couple of days. Accordingly, the matter was kept today. Today also the petitioner and his Advocate are absent when called. 3 The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. Intimation of vacating the interim orders be sent to the trial court. (D.G.KARNIK,J.) spb/- 2 wp433-2000.sxw FURTHER ORDER 4 Mentioned at 3 p.m. by Mr. P.B.Shah, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Umashankar Upadhaya, learned counsel for respondent no.1. On their mentioning earlier order is recalled and taken up for hearing. 5 Learned counsel for the respondent no.1 states that the matter has been settled and the petitioner has already handed over the possession of the suit premises to the respondent no.1. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute this position. The uncontroverted statement of the Advocate for the Respondent No.1 is accepted and the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. [D.G. KARNIK, J.]