wr Q; 4&7 W W APPELLANT: (Piaintif‘fs) 1. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISQARH. BILASPUR ‘ $econd Appeal (PER) Na.2?81 of 2007 Shiv Bhqjcm, 5/0 Lam Gunga Rdjwar, aged about 40 yearsi Jagdheri, 5/0 Lafe Ganga Rajwar, aggd abouf 45 years, (of unsound mind by fhe nexT friend - Appellanf No.1); Bo‘rh are residen‘rs of Viliuge Duggq Tah. Surajpur, Disff. SurguJa (C.6.). Versus 1. Mohar Sui, 5/0 Lm‘e Hublal Rajwa’r, aged abo’u‘l‘ 58 years: Harinandan, 5/0 Lafe Moharsai Rajwar, \aged abom’ 25 year's; Ramwiksh, 5/0 Moharsai Rajwar, aged abouf 22 year's: Sodhadhari, S/o Maharsai, aged abou‘r 2O years; AH are residenTs of Viliage Dugga, Tah Surajpur, Disf‘r. Surguja (C‘GJ Sfafe of Chhaffisgar‘h, Through fhe Coliecfor, Disff. Surguja (Ambikapur) (ca) {Second appeal under Secfion 100 of fhe Code of Civil Procedure, 1908} RESPONDENTS/: (Defendam's) Mr. OP. Yadav, counsel for- fhe appelianfs. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the Sfaie/respondenf No.50 Single Bench: Hon‘ble Mr. T.P. Shawna, J AL ORDER (4-3-2009) \ Q 1. This appeal has been preferred affer 7&1 days of ifs limi’ra‘fion. No U applicafion for condona‘rion of delay in'filing The appeal has been filed by i fhe‘appellanfs on fhe dafe' of filing of fhisrappeal i.e. 10-9—2007 or Tiil xxQlday. @ S/ . , OR u