CRLR No.89 of 2002 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the revisionist. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for respondent no.1. Mr. L.K. Tiwari, Advocate for respondent nos.2 and 3. Learned counsel for the parties fairly submitted that in view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court, in the case of Adalat Prasad Vs. Jindal and others, reported in (2004) 7 S.C.C., 338” the revision is not maintainable against the summoning order and only a petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is maintainable. In view of the above, the present revision is dismissed as not maintainable. However, the liberty is given to the revisionist to avail the appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum. Interim order dated 9.10.2002 stands vacated. (D.V.,J.) 12.8.2010 RG