ca13236.09 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13236 OF 2009 ,In SAST/24687/2009 MOHAN GANGARAM MANGNALE VERSUS ARCHANABAI PIRAJI BURANGAL AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Deshpande Murar V. Advocate for Respondents : Mr.Kedar Balbhim R. For R-1 B B ... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. Dated: November 18, 2011 ... Heard. The learned Counsel for respondents vehemently opposed the application for condonation of delay. He submits that the delay is not properly explained. 2 Upon perusal of para 5 of the application, I find that the delay is satisfactorily explained. The respondent No. 2 is wife of the appellant - applicant and ca13236.09 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ respondents No.1 and 3 are daughters. 3 In the facts and circumstances of this case, delay is condoned. Application allowed and stands disposed of. Second appeal be listed for admission on 25th November, 2011. The learned Counsel for respondents submits that respondent No.1 may be allowed to withdraw the amount of Rs. 5000/- deposited in the Registry of this Court. The prayer is not opposed by the Counsel for the appellant. The learned Counsel for respondent No.1 is allowed to withdraw the amount of Rs.5000/- without any condition. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) PLK/*