IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SECOND APPEAL No 430 of 1982 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- TRUSTEES OF HAIDARSHA PIR NO TAKIYO Versus LADHUBHA DEVAJI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR DEEPAK M SHAH for Petitioners MS MITABEN R TALREJA for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE Date of decision: 11/02/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Mr. Deepak M. Shah, learned Advocate for the appellants, appears and places on record a xerox copy of a settlement arrived at between the parties in the year 1988. It be taken on record. He states that the disputes between the parties are resolved and there is no dispute surviving since 13th January, 1988, the date on which the document is executed. Ms. Mitaben R. Talreja, learned advocate for the respondent is not present when the matter is called out. However, Mr. Shah states that he has already informed her about this settlement and about his intention of placing it on record. 2. In view of the statement made at the Bar by learned advocate Mr. Shah, this appeal does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly with no orders as to costs. [ A.L. DAVE, J. ] gt