IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 22ND AUGUST 2011 / 31ST SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22747 of 2011(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. BITTO JOSEPH, VADAKKEKURRATTIYIL HOUSE, POOVATHOOR POST,KOIPURAM, PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. REGHURAMV.S., VALIYAVEEDU, ANGADIPURAM POST, MALAPPURAM. 3. SAGAR.P., KALYANI SADAN HOUSE, MANAMAL POST, KOILANDI, KOZHIKODE. 4. SREEKANTH.S., THOTTUPURATH HOUSE, NADUVATTAM POST, KUTTIPURAM, MALAPPURAM. 5. SANSAR.K.MOHAN, KUTTANTHARAPPEL HOUSE, VAZHANI POST, TRISSUR. 6. RAHUL.M., SAKETHA, KARINGARAPULY, KADAMKOTTE POST, PALAKKAD. 7. HAREESH.V., SREENILAYAM HOUSE, MANGALAMPALAM POST, PALAKKAD. 8. MANOJ.R., THEKKEPAVADY HOUSE, PAZHAMPALAKODE POST, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.VINOD VALLIKAPPAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE CONTROLLOR OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, ERANJIPALLAM POST, MALAPPURAM-673635. BY SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW - SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 22747 of 2011(P) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE MEMO DTD.2.7.2011 EXT.P2: COPY OF THE EXPLANATION SUBMITTED TO THE MEMO BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DTD.15.7.2011 EXT.P3: COPY OF THE EXPLANATION SUBMITTED TO THE MEMO BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DTD.15.7.2011 EXT.P4: COPY OF THE EXPLANATION SUBMITTED TO THE MEMO BY THE 3RD PETITIONER DTD.15.7.2011 EXT.P5: COPY OF THE EXPLANATION SUBMITTED TO THE MEMO BY THE 4TH PETITIONER DTD.15.7.2011 EXT.P6: COPY OF THE EXPLANATION SUBMITTED TO THE MEMO BY THE 5TH PETITIONER DTD.15.7.2011 EXT.P7: COPY OF THE EXPLANATION SUBMITTED TO THE MEMO BY THE 6TH PETITIONER DTD.15.7.2011 EXT.P8: COPY OF THE EXPLANATION SUBMITTED TO THE MEMO BY THE 7TH PETITIONER DTD.15.7.2011 EXT.P9: COPY OF THE EXPLANATION SUBMITTED TO THE MEMO BY THE 8TH PETITIONER DTD.15.7.2011 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 22747 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of August , 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners were issued memos alleging suspected cases of malpractice in the 4th Semester B.Tech examination held in June, 2010. Explanations by Exts.P2 and P9 have been filed and as a result of the pendency of the proceedings results are withheld. It is in these circumstances directing expeditious completion of the proceedings this writ petition is filed. The learned Standing Counsel on instructions submits that the process of inquiry will be completed at any rate within six months from today. The above said submission of the learned Standing Counsel is recorded and the writ petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-