(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 468 OF 1999 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 468 OF 1999 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 468 OF 1999 Kamgar Utkarsha Sabha ...Petitioner Versus M.T.R.C. Electronics Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents ..... Mr. Avinash Fatangare h/f Mr.K.S. Bapat, counsel for Petitioner Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.5. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 1ST MARCH, 2005 DATED: 1ST MARCH, 2005 DATED: 1ST MARCH, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. It is alleged that the order passed by the Labour Court on 24.2.1999 has not been implemented. If that be so, the petitioner Union has remedy U/Section 48 of the M.R.T.U. and P.U.L.P. Act, 1971 and when such an alternative remedy is available in special statute, this contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 need not be entertained at this belated stage. The contempt petition is, therefore, rejected summarily.