HJGHCOURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR DIVIStONBENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ & HON'BLE SHR! L.G. BHADQQ, •J. Writ ABBeai No.10 oT2SXi8 APPELLANT ptnTJONER A.K. Verma son of Late Shri J.P. Venna aged about 55 years, Qocupation- Servioe, Presently working as Training Superintendent in Industrial Training. Institute, Premnagar under ;the of Technical Eduoatiori & of Department RESPONDENTS: 1. Manpower Planning, Soienoe Technology of the State Chhattisgarh, Resident of Near I.T.I. Buiiding Premnagar, Tahsil Surajpur, DistrictSurgujafC.G.) , VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, ThroLQh ; Secretary, Department of Maripower Ptanning, Science & Technology, Mantralava,. D.K.S. Bhawan, Ralpur (C.G.) Direotor, Employment & Training, State of Chhatti%19rh. BvrQn Bszssr RS'EXT (C.G.) : Pnnoipat, Industrial Tralning Institute, Ambikapur, Distriot Surguja (C.G.) Principal, Industrial Tralning Inst'rtute, Bi!aspur(C.G.) R.A. Ansari son of Not know to the appeltant, aged not known to the appellant, Oooupation-Seryfee, Presentiy working as Training Superintendent Jn Industrial Training !nstJtute under the Department of Technical Education, Manpower Planning, Science & Technology of the State of Ghhattisgarh, ResKlent of industria! Training Instityte, Koni, Bi!aspur$C.G.$ Writ Appeal underSectlon2(1iof Miah Court of Chhattisaarh {Appeat to DMSlon BenoM. Aot 2006 Present ShriRajeevShriyastava, iearnedlooynselfortheappellant Shrl Klshore Bhaduri, leamed Additional Advoeate General for theState. 2. 3. 4. 5. -3- JUDOMBN1' (04mFel uar'ft2Bfl^ The following judgment of the Gourt was psssed by ftajeev Supta, C-l. Heard teamed wunsel forthe parties on aAnission. (2) The appellant has filed this writ appearagainst the impi^ited juc^nneRtdated 4th January, 2008, passed in W.P.(S) No.SCOOS. (3) Appellant-A.K.Vermafiledthevwttpetltlonferthefbllowingrelt^s:- "......The petitioner most humbly antf mspectfully pra^ forthe fotlowlng rellef's: 7.1). The Hon'bteOeurt may Idnefly be pleased to call for the entlre records pertaining to the ease crf the petitionerifor the kind perusal ofthis Hon'bte Court. 7.2 TheHen'bteG^Hjitmay.WndlyA&pleasedtoissue a writ of certlotari.quashlrg the order dated •17.12.2007 baaring no. F-1-28CT07^@ passettby^the respendent No.t 7.3 This Hon'ble Gourt may kindly be pteased te direcfcthe respondents to altow the petitloner te> join at Korba in pursuance to orcter dated 27.06.2007. 7.4 Gost of the pditton may aisat»grartedtw#« pettticmer. ^ 7.5 Any other felief whishthis.Mon'bleCourtdeeins fit and proper may aiso kindly begraBisdtothepedtiwieE, iatbe: interest ofjustlce." (4) The appellant, in sutetance, was et^llenging the oreter drted 17-12-2007 wheteby ttie eartier orelerdated 27-6^2007 traiistlBn-tng^ ttiei appeltant from Rrei'o Nagarto-Korto1ita& cancelteci. (5) Submisstor'®adwuiced on betaa .o( the a^ellant. tiBnotfinet.&VGMF with the writ CouFt;F ulting inpassir^40fthe ii|npttg'ia3;.judg(neiatiwtieBet>y'l theappetlant'swritpetlttoRwasdisraissed. (6) ShriShrh/astava, learr^ eouasel fiar.ftw^ ^ vehMtia'itl^i argued ttiat the appellant vias tiansfen'egiften'i IWenB-Nagaf to W-t^ request onhumanWan greund ariclttie irapi^i'ieclereler ^aS:fT-^a-aQS iOBJ.Bt^ll.i ii • ii]r Jf:, ;li^' :as\ y9 M l"lltllUi;! iMII IIBII 11BBII! aiiii |^3gfi^^g^ga2.iSifcl.Si3!W,13sa,at£(Maa '^•'^^ ;^^^^^^^;^^^^^^^^^%%^1^^^§ -3 whereby the appellant's transter was eanoelted has r^ulted in gceat haretehlp totheappellantand his laroitymembers. (7) On due cCTisideration of tfte sutynisslms of learned eounset for the parties, we are ofthe opinlon ftatitwould be appropriate for the appellant te make a fresh repFesentationto Fespondents l\b.1 to 4 Mgtiiyhttag hte hardship and ctifRcuttles at the present ptoee ofposting i.e. Prem Nagar. We hope that the representation to be made by the appeltant would be considered by respondents No.l to 4sympa8ietlcally on humanitarian ground. (8) __VgtlTthe above dlnection, trte writ appeal Is disposeci of. Sd/- ChiefJustice .Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge Subbu