1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.30 OF 2005 IN REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.23050 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3035 OF 1992 Smt.Shahnaz Hassan Sanade. ..Applicant. V/s. Shri Shivaji Education Society & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.I.S.Thakur with Rathore Sunilkumar for applicant. Mr.R.R.Bhosale for respondent No.1. Mr.S.A.Ingawale for respondent No.2. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : DECEMBER 9, 2005. DATE : DECEMBER 9, 2005. DATE : DECEMBER 9, 2005. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. This application is for condonation of delay in filing review petition. Delay is stated to be around 296 days. The cause for delay mentioned in the applicant amongst others is that the advocate on record of the applicant had met with an accident and stopped attending court, during which period writ petition was listed and disposed of exparte. It is next stated that in July, 2004, the applicant contacted the advocate on record who in turn advised the applicant to approach another advocate Mr.Dilip Bodke. Accordingly, the applicant got in touch with advocate Mr.Dilip Bodke and thereafter present 2 proceedings have been taken up after intimation was received by the applicant about disposal of the present petition. 2. In my opinion, cause for delay mentioned in the application appears to be genuine and bonafide. Accordingly, even though there is delay of 296 days, I am inclined to condone the same in the interest of justice. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).