IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2009 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 1421 of 2009() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.178/2006 OF BADIYADKA POLICE STATION CMP.485/2009 of J.M.F.C.,KASARAGOD .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED -------------------------------------- RABDIN @ SALIM, AGED 34/09, S/O. NAGUR PICHAI, ARUNACHALAM COLONY, KARAMBAKKAM, PORUR, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU. BY ADV. SRI.T.B.SHAJIMON SMT.GOVINDU P.RENUKADEVI RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT --------------------------------------------------- THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BADIYADKA POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = B.A.No.1421 of 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated, this the 24th day of March, 2009 ORDER Petitioner who is the accused in Crime No.178 of 2006 of Badiyadka Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 120(b), 449,395 and 302 IPC seeks his enlargement on bail. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the legal injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Dated this the 24th day of March, 2009 V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) sj