In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRR No. 2015 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 05.09.2011 Smt. Seema ....Petitioner Versus Deepak ....Respondent. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Kul Bhushan Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. ... A.N. Jindal, J.(Oral) Heard. The evidence reveals that respondent has not much income, but only Rs.3500/- per month, being temporary employee with the Metro Rail, therefore, I am helpless to hold that the maintenance awarded to the wife on the basis of the income of the husband so disclosed, is proper. However, if the petitioner is able to lay her hands on any other income being earned by the husband, she may move for varying the said order. Dismissed. ( A.N. Jindal ) Judge 05.09.2011 sk.