IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15993 of 2011 JAI PRAKASH RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 22.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Kidnapped boy was recovered on the same day after persuasion of the Police from liquor depot of Rajiv Kumar Singh. Petitioner along with six others in number was found present there causing torture upon the victim boy. Submission is that petitioner is domestic servant of landlord of Rajiv Kumar Singh is of no substance as there can be no grudge to falsely implicate a poor boy in the incident may have no enmity with anyone nor any grudge. Four accused persons are only named by victim in his statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. which is more than he could do. It is not possible for a boy kept in captivity of several persons to name all. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for bail is rejected. However, Trial court is directed to expedite the trial. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)