IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 17TH OCTOBER 2011 / 25TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 27377 of 2011(V) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ SAJEESH. K.K., S/O. KESAVAN, AGED 25 YEARS, KUTTIYATTIL HOUSE, NANNAMUKKU P.O., MALAPPURAM DIST. (OWNER OF KRZ-6525) BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE/ REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR-680 003. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KODAKARA POLICE STATION, KODAKARA.P.O., THRISSUR-680 684. 3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR-680 003. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.MOHAMMED SHAH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/10/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 27377 of 2011(V) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.21582/11 DATED 8-8-11. EXT.P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN B3-13941/11 DATED 20-9-11. EXT.P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 30-9-11. EXT.P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM APPLICATION FOR INTERIM CUSTODY OF THE VEHICLE IN REVISION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 30-9-10. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- BIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 27377 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 17th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T Aggrieved by Ext.P2 final order passed in a proceedings under the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001, petitioner has filed Ext.P3 revision before the 3rd respondent along with Ext.P4 application for interim custody of the vehicle. Orders have not been passed either on the revision or the application for interim custody, and therefore, the writ petition is filed. 2. I heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. Taking note of the pendency of Ext.P3 revision, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the 3rd respondent shall expeditiously dispose of the revision with notice to the parties concerned. In the meantime, the 3rd respondent shall pass orders on Ext.P4 application for interim custody without any delay in the matter applying the principles laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in Shan C.T. v. State of Kerala [2010(3)KHC 333]. WPC No. 27377/11 :2 : Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 3rd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp