$ENELE BEN Hr y a \ c ”‘60 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAT‘URE AT BILASPUR WRIT ?ETITION HO. gglg [BME PETITIONER : \A/QF‘ /Jitendra K _ . Miuhrn hung” S10 Late $hr1 Knpa Shankgr Mmhra’ Resident ofJain Mandir Road, Pratapdav ward Jagdalpur (CG) /’ "...'3§Q»o Aged about 35 years x1. sate orcmttiagxh Through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralya Raipur.(C.G.] (2. {11m Manhunt, Department of Lam! Rccord, D,K‘S, Bhman, Mantralya Raipur.(C.G.} ,« 3. The Conector- Bah: , Land Racord, Collecturate Jagdaipur, Baetar (C.G.] ' 4. &nt Anna Mahapau-a (Pawn-n, Poatcd at Tahei1 offlcc Narayanpur, Distt. Bastar {C.G.} f WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONS‘H‘IUTION OF INDIA. FOR ISHIANCE OF WT IN Tl-E NA'IURE OF GERI‘IORAR! MANDAMHS E1“ AND FOR APPROPRIA'IEORDER OR DIRECTION DIRE110N$ K3 XI—HC—22 15-12-2605. $’hri Avinash Mishramounsel for the petitioner. Shri'Sandeep Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State. i.A.No.9575i2005 ion of delay in filing process fee. Learned counsel for the petitoner submits that due td bone tide mistake the petitioner couid not paid t e process fee within time and prays for condoning the delay In filing the proces fee / On the other hand learned co nsel appearing for the State submits that after obtaining interim reief the petltioner should have complied the orders passed by this Court by pa mg process fee Within the stipuiated penod Having considered the facts ‘nd circumstances cf the case and materiai'on record, the appiication (.A.No.9575[2005)wis atlowed and the 'deiay in fiiing the pro‘cess fee is condc ed. Learned counsel for’the petiioner'submits'that Vide order dated 16-9-2005 (Annexure-Pt‘t)‘ the petitio er has been transferred frorn Tahsil Ofhce. 'Jagdalpur to Tahsii Offiee N rayanpur. He further submits that the tramfer order has been issued durin the bah period. He aiso $ubm§t5 that/ the petitioner‘s mother who is aged a out 86 years is suffering from severe“ I attack of paralysis. Learned co'unsei s Ibméts that far the present the peiitioner may be given an opportunity of filing the detaiied representation before the Competent authority ofthe respondent , which shail be considered on its own Qerits in acoordanée with iaw. This is an application for condon Aecordingiy, i..A.No.9575/2005 ands disposed of. Heard. \ [eta than t XI—HC»22 .x man-i aéEa' /L/ y Having comidered amiwithoui direci§on i3 given ‘to the petitioner to his grievances befbre the competent z copy “of the petition and this order; wi representation being fiied, the compi decide the same on its own—merits, poseibie preferably within a period cf the representatien. Learned connsei for the petitic ‘ been reiieved. He prays thaf the petitic; forkthe ,eetitioner, it is directed that if may be ailowed to continue tiii the rep: With the afcresaid observations WWW WW1 amVmanéw Gowri expreseing any opinion on the merits of the caee, in the opinion ofthis Court, ends of justice will be served if a make a detaiieci representation raising mthority of the respondents‘aiong with a :hin a period of tiivo weeks, and on such atent authority of the respondents shaii in accordance with law as early as two monthe from the date of recetpt of iner eubmits that the petitioner hae not her may be aiiowed-to continue. in View of the aforesaid statemknt made by learned counsei appearing the petitioner has not been relieved he esentation is decided. ,rhis' petition stands dispqsed or. ' Conseq’nentiy, M.(W.).P.No.42'179/05 also stands disposed of. Certified copy as per ruies. ‘_l Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge [new W