CR No. 6960 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 6960 of 2010 Date of decision:- 26.10.2010 Jang Bahadur Singh and another ......petitioners vs. Arshnoor Singh and others ......respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. R. S. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) CM No. 27139-CII of 2010 Application is allowed. Filing of certified copy of Annexue P-1 is dispensed with. CR No. 6960 of 2010 Petitioners are the purchaser of the property from defendant No. 2 during the pendency of the civil suit for declaration filed by the plaintiff respondent No. 1 claiming title over the suit property. Learned trial Court found that the petitioners cannot be permitted to take the plea of the bona fide purchaser since they are the purchaser during the pendency of the suit but in order to protect the interest of the purchaser, petitioners have been allowed to defend the present suit along with defendants. Thereafter, the case has been fixed for documentary evidence on behalf of defendant No.2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the case has been fixed CR No. 6960 of 2010 -2- for the evidence of defendant No.2 but the petitioners are not permitted to lead oral and documentary evidence as may be led by them to protect their interest as the assignee of defendant No. 2. I do not find that the inference sought to be raised by the petitioners are available from the reading of the order passed by learned trial Court. But in any case, it is clarified that it shall be open to the petitioners to lead oral and documentary evidence in respect of title of their vendor i.e. defendant No. 2 With the said observations, revision petition stands disposed of. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 26.10.2010 preeti