IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 1559 of 2001 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 21/09/2001 in WP NO : 12588 OF 2001 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 Bajaj Electricals Limited having its Registered Office at 45/47, Veer Nariman Road Mumbai- 400 023 Rep. by its General Manager Sri.V.Ramachandran 2 Vishnu Yashwanth Parab S/o.Yashwanth Vishnu Parab 19/554, Nehru Nagar Kurla East, Mumbai- 400024 ..... APPELLANTS AND 1 The Hyderabad Urban Development Authority 1-8-323, Paiga Palace, Police Lines, Secunderabad-3 Rep.by its Chairman 2 The Chief Engineer, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, 1-8-323, Paiga Palace, Police Lines, Secunderabad-3 3 M/s BSES Limited BSES House 1-11-219/1, Gurumurthy Lane, Begumpet, Hyderabad Rep. by its Managing Director .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:M/SC.KODANDA RAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.S.SATYAM REDDY The Court made the following : ORAL JUDGMENT: (per THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI) Ms. Anjali Agarwal, Advocate, appearing on behalf of the Mr. C.Kodanda Ram, learned counsel for the Appellants, submitted that the Writ Appeal has become infructuous. Recording the same, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to cost. ____________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari _______________________ Justice Ramesh Ranganathan July 28 2008 MAS. ........REGISTRAR To 1. 2.2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WA {LOBIS}