IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 4671 of 2009 Between: Sri Guru Nanak Co-operative Building Society Limited (Regd.No.2564) rep.by its President Sri Hari Mohinder Singh Sahani Resident of 27-18-28, Congress officer Road Governorpet,Vijayawada ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner,Vijayawada Municipal Corporation Vijayawada 2 Vijayawada, Guntur, Tenali,and Mangalagiri Urban Development Authority, rep.by its Vice Chairman Governorpet, Vijayawada 3 Pavan Kumar Sharma S/o.Late Sham Sunder Sharma R/o.Plot No.71, Sri Guru Nanak colony Vijayawada 4 Ramesh Kumar Sharma s/o.Late Sudesh Kumar Sharma R/o.Plot No.71, Sri Guru Nanak colony Vijayawada 5 Susheel Kumar Chandha S/o.Prem Prakash Chandha R/o.Plot No.47, Sri Guru Nanak colony Vijayawada 6 Praveen Kumar Chandha S/o.Prem Prakash Chandha R/o.Plot No.47, Sri Guru Nanak colony Vijayawada 7 Atluri Jahnsi Lakshmi D/o.Atluri Venkteswara Rao R/o.Plot No.47, Sri Guru Nanak colony Vijayawada ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue of writ order or direction more particularly writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of 1st and 2nd respondents in stopping unauthorised constructions carrying by the Respondent Nos.3 to 7 in Plot Nos.71,47 and 70 in Sri Guru Nanak Co-operative building Society Limited (Regd.No.2564) as arbitrary, capricious and illegal, and consequently direct the respondents No.3 to 7 not to permit the constructions being done in violation and deviation of the Approved plan and Regulations Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.ARAVINDU MATURI Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.G.JHANSI The Court made the following : Order: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner questioning the inaction on the part of respondents 1 and 2 in stopping the unauthorized constructions being carried by respondents 3 to 7 in Plot Nos.71, 47 and 70 in Sri Guru Nanak Cooperative Building Society. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned standing counsel for the Vijayawada Municipal Corporation and the learned standing counsel for the Vijayawada, Guntur, Tenali and Mangalagiri Urban Development Authority and at their request the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage. The petitioner is a Cooperative Building Society. It is its grievance that respondents 3 to 7 are making unauthorized constructions in the colony and, therefore, it made representations to respondents 1 and 2 herein to take necessary action to stop the unauthorised constructions but so far no action has been initiated and taking advantage of the situation, respondents 3 to 7 are proceeding with the construction work. The learned standing counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submit that since the representations of the petitioner are pending with the authorities, instead of this Court going into the merits of the matter, the authorities may be directed to consider and dispose of the said representations, for which course of action, learned counsel for the petitioner also agreed. In the circumstances, without going into the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.2.2009 after giving notice and opportunity to the unofficial respondents and take necessary action in accordance with law expeditiously. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.6.3.2009 msv