IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS THURSDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2010 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 6714 of 2010(L) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------------- SASEENDRAN.L., S/O. LAKSHMANAN, RAJESHWARI BHAVAN, PUNNAPRA, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.P.VINODKUMAR SRI.P.S.AJITH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OS HOME AFFAIRS, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE SUPERINTENDE OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, A ALAPPUZHA SOUTH POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA. 4. THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUNNAPRA, ALAPPUZHA. 5. HARSHAN, KALIKADU HOUSE, PUNNAPRA.P.O., ALAPPUZHA. R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SUKUMARAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.6714 of 2010-L ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 4th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioner has approached this Court complaining harassment by police even without registering a crime to settle the dispute for the benefit of the 5th respondent. 2. We heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader. 3. Briefly put, the case of the petitioner is as follows:--Petitioner has obtained an injunction order restraining the 5th respondent from obstructing plaint schedule pathway. It is stated that after the filing of the suit, the 5th respondent continued with his obstruction. Petitioner had filed a petition before the 4th respondent regarding the violation of the order and also requesting to prosecute the 5th respondent. It is stated that the 5th respondent has lodged a complaint against the petitioner. It is further stated that on 12.2.2010 the petitioner was called to the police station of the 4th respondent. It is also stated that the petitioner explained the situation, however, on the basis of the undue influence by the 5th respondent the petitioner was abused by the 4th respondent using filthy words. It is stated that on the WPC No.6714/2010 -2- next day the 4th respondent directed that the petitioner should use the pathway only under the supervision and mercy of the 5th respondent. 4. Learned Government Pleader submits that complaints were received from the petitioner and the 5th respondent and that in order to avoid law and order problem the official respondent has interfered in the matter. Apparently, the matter is pending before the Civil Court. Learned Government Pleader would also submit that the official respondents will not interfere in the dispute between the petitioner and the 5th respondent. We record the above submission of the learned Government Pleader and close this writ petition. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS