IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No. 3693 of 2009 Date of decision : December 07, 2010 Sohan Lal ....Appellant versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and another ....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. Santosh Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate, for the appellant Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate, for the respondents L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant submits that since jurisdiction of civil court to try the suit is barred by section 50 of the Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977 (in short, the Act), plaintiff-appellant may be permitted to withdraw the instant suit with liberty to the plaintiff-appellant to prefer revision petition against resumption order. Heard. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. Section 50 of the Act bars jurisdiction of the civil court to try the suit challenging resumption order passed by the Estate Officer under the Act. Consequently, jurisdiction of the civil court to try the instant suit is barred by section 50 of the Act. In view thereof, aforesaid prayer of the Regular Second Appeal No. 3693 of 2009 -2- plaintiff-appellant is allowed. Judgments and decrees of the courts below are set aside. Suit is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. ( L.N. Mittal ) December 07, 2010 Judge 'dalbir'