In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Criminal Misc. No.M-2337 of 2009 ..... Date of decision:21.4.2009 Karan Singh .....Petitioner v. Santosh and another .....Respondents .... Present: Mr. Tapan Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. None for respondent No.1. Mr. K.C. Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.2-State. ...... S.S. Saron, J. As per office report, notice that was issued to respondent No.1 for 26.2.2009 has been received back served on 2.3.2009. As per the notice, respondent No.1 stood served for 26.2.2009. However, despite that no one has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in compliance to the order dated 2.2.2009, the petitioner appeared before the trial Court and has furnished his personal bond and surety to the satisfaction of the Court. The petitioner has been summoned as an accused vide order dated 2.9.2008 (Annexure-A.1). Besides, Shiv Rattan, the co-accused of the petitioner has been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 27.1.2009 (Annexure-A.2). In the afore-noticed circumstances, the interim bail granted to Cr. Misc. No.M-2337 of 2009 [2] the petitioner on 2.2.2009 is made absolute. The petitioner during the trial of the case shall remain on bail on such terms and conditions as may be fixed by the trial Court and to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The criminal miscellaneous petition stands disposed of. April 21, 2009. (S.S. Saron) Judge *hsp*