HIWCOURTOPWHATTISfeffiULAr^BASR.St W. P.(aNo.2642of2007 Petfh'oners ^.:>;, S^v'-:'-^^^^. j Verais Respondents 1. Smf. Dula'i Uikey Aged cdwut 41 years, W/6. Shro t^ltfiari Lal Uikey lAssistant : Teachet', Pr'imcrySchool Kodagaon 2; Smt. Parmita Thakur Agedobwft 44 yew^, "W/o. ^ni 5.R. Thakur ^ssistant Teacher, Primaty School Bevrati • 3. Jeevan Singh Netam 4g8<td?out 44ye(B-s,S/o.S11riPhool5!iigh Netam Assist<^ %acher; RnmarySchoolKodtgoon 4. Syonesh Kuma* Jurri Agecldbout 42 years, S/o. Shri Ran dayal Jurri A^istant Teachep, Priffluy School Tlkaropara. Koda^aon Atl ape ot Block Kanker, Distt. KarSwfC^ 1. State of Chhatt-i^arh, Throigh Secretary, School ^ JEaucation &epat'tfflent, 6.K.S;. Bhcnwin, R<iipir{C.&^ 2. TTleEMpiector PtA>licInstruction Etepafftment Ridipur (S^) 3. &istrict &luc<rton Officer Konker DistrictKwiker (C.S.) 4. Block Educotion OfficeF Kanker ^®-) 5. Treasury AFunds &epaptfflent Konker<C.©.) WpttPetitiOrrunderArt-icle226of<the ConstitutioriofJEndjg SB: Hon'bleShrJjiBticeSatish,K;Agnihotri. Present: Mr.AW. T^4^^^»'*<:hW<^^R^eP^ Ms. Sunita Sjan, Ponel'fcnwyer' fiopl+ie iStqte/pespsndents. O RD E R pOS3edon^his2"BDcyofMay,2007) 1. The <|uestion of law invojved henein is flsfo whether the petitioners cire entitted to pegula' pcy scate w.e.f. the date of initial q>pointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appea-ing ^for the petitionera as well as for the State/resporiden'ts jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are thesame as to thot of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/2CX36 (StBhil Tiwdiri and ottiers vs. Stote ©overnment of Chhattisgorh A others), which wos allowed vide order dated 7.U.3X)6. ^jbhash 3. In view of the above-statedsubmissions made by learned counseifor the parties^ the tn'it petition is allowed in the sane terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge MSSBBS8S sSSwMs^M xS^jsKSXSSiS iKSsSggglB—