THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH Dated this the 13th day of October, 2009. Writ Petition No. 25163 of 2006. Between: Khaja Khan ………Petitioner vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sanga Reddy and another. ……..Respondents. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH Writ Petition No. 25163 of 2006. ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking to issue an order or writ more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the agricultural land of the petitioner in S.No.267 to an extent of Ac. 5.00 situated at Siddapur village, Sadasivapet mandal, Medak District as illegal and arbitrary. The case of the petitioner is that he is the absolute owner and possessor of agricultural land of an extent of Ac. 5.00 in S.No. 267 of Siddapur village, Sadasivapet mandal, Medak District. As his father was landless poor person, he (his father) applied to the then Tahsildar for assignment of land in the year 1962 and that the Tahsildar conducted enquiry and after having satisfied, recommended for assignment of land in their favour and accordingly the assignment patta in respect of the above land was issued in his name. Eversince the assignment of land, himself and his father have been cultivating the land and they have also been issued Pattadar Passbooks and Tittle Deeds and their names were reflected in the pahanies for the years 1994 to 2005. While so, some officials of the 2nd respondents came to his land and started taking measurements of his land on 25.11.2006 and when he asked them as to why they were taking measurements of the land, they replied that the land belong to Government and though he represented to them that the land was assigned to him, they did not hear and that on 26.11.2006 he approached the 2nd respondent for information, but he was not furnished any information. In the circumstances, the petitioner is before this Court for the relief already adverted to above. Though the writ petition was instituted in the year 2006, the respondents did not choose to file any counter. Having regard to the averments made in the affidavit and having regard to the fact that the respondents did not file any counter either disputing or admitting the averments made in the affidavit, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the land in dispute and dispossess him, without following the due process of law. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. __________________ G.CHANDRAIAH,J. 13.10.2009. Krb. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH Writ Petition No. 25163 of 2006. Dated this the 13th day of October, 2009.