HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA W.P.No.24820 of 2010 ORDER (Per BPR,J): Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Solicitor General, appearing for the respondents 1 and 5, and the learned Government Pleader for Forests, appearing for the respondents 2 to 4. 2. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking to assail the correctness of the order passed in O.A.No.654 of 2008, dated 18-03-2010 on the file of the Central Adminisrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for brevity ‘the Tribunal’) with regard to the certain grievances. 3. The said O.A. was filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents authorities to summon all the records pertaining to the selection of posts under promotion quota of the Indian Forest Service for the year 2006. However, the CAT, considering the oral and documentary evidence, dismissed the O.A. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed this writ petition to set aside the impugned order by declaring the action of the respondents in not selecting the petitioner for promotion to IFS for the year 2006, under the provisions of IFS (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, as illegal and arbitrary. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that subsequently, after dismissal of the O.A., the petitioner filed an application before the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Hyderabad, under Right to Information Act, and obtained necessary particulars which have relevance and substantial effect on the result of the O.A., and thus, this material is also form and part of material for consideratoin before the Tribunal and therefore, the learned counsel seeks one more opportunity to the petitioner to put-forth his contentions before the CAT by proper pleadings and other relevant particulars, otherwise, the petitioner will loose his substantial rights to contest his case in manner. 5. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order, we are of the opinion that in view of the subsequent events regarding the petitioner obtaining relevant material particulars, if the petitioner will be given one more opportunity, no prejudice would be caused to the respondents authorities. Hence, the petitioner is permitted to file necessary and relevant material particulars before the CAT and put-forth his contention in proper manner within a period of two weeks, and on such material being filed, the CAT shall dispose of the O.A. by considering afresh all the material evidence, after giving due notice to both the parties. 6. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is allowed. The impugned order passed in O.A.No.654 of 2008, dated 18-03-2010 is set side and the matter is remitted back to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, for fresh consideration and disposal. No costs. _______________________ JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO Date: 20th April 2011 _____________________ JUSTICE B.N RAO NALLA kvr