IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5656 of 2010 Satyendra Pd. Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 2 01.08.2011 Heard Mr. Rajendra Nath Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner. There is no representation on behalf of the State. The writ petition has been filed for removal of encroachment caused by the private respondent No.6. Mr. Sinha relying upon the order in a proceeding instituted under Section 147 of the Code of Criminal Procedure submits that the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Darbhanga has clearly held that there is an encroachment by the private respondent No.6 on a Gairmajarua land. He submits that the finding of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate as can be found at Annexure-3 has also been supported by the Circle Officer, Darbhanga in its memo dated 25.04.2006 placed at Annexure-4. From perusal of the order passed in the proceeding under Section 147 Cr.P.C. it is evident that a complaint had been made by the petitioner regarding obstruction to the common passage by the private respondent No.6. 2 The nature of dispute being completely private in nature this Court would not dwell upon the issue in exercise of power under 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is dismissed. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J.)