LPA No. 1788 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 1788 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision 21.12.2010 Dayanand Medical College and Hospital Ludhiana through its Principal & others -----Appellants Versus The Educational Tribunal, Punjab, Chandigarh through its Registrar. ---Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. Balram Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anamika, Advocate for the appellants. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The instant appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against interlocutory order dated 28.10.2010 rendered by the learned Single Judge. The grievance made is to the second part of order whereby learned Single Judge has granted liberty to the appellant to move appropriate application, in case, enquiry officer finds that Dr. Kuldip Singh-respondent No.2 is obstructing in ongoing enquiry. It would obviously mean that if any witness is sought to be influenced by Dr. Kuldip Singh-respondent No.2 or any record is sought to be tampered with or any other thing of that nature happens then the appellant is at liberty to move an LPA No. 1788 of 2010 (O&M) -2- appropriate application. In view of the aforesaid liberty granted by the learned Single Judge, it would not be possible for us to come to a conclusion in a blanket manner that respondent No.2 would influence the witness or tamper with the record. We find that there is enough room in the interlocutory order left for the appellant to move an appropriate application. 2. In view of the above, we do not wish to interfere in the arrangement made by the learned Single Judge by the impugned interlocutory order. 3. Accordingly, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (RITU BAHRI) JUDGE December 21, 2010 Atul