IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4928 of 2009 SUBODH CHAUDHARY & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 19.5.2009 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a police case under Sections 384 & 386 of the Indian Penal Code. That co-accused apprehended on the spot has been granted regular bail, and that there has been a subsequent compromise between the parties when submission is of an alleged contractual dispute are matters to be appropriately considered in regular bail on behalf of the petitioner, without being prejudiced by the present order. It needs no reiteration that the considerations for a regular bail and anticipatory bail are entirely different and the rejection of the later cannot prejudice the consideration of the former. It is submitted that the petitioners are stated to have no antecedent. The application is rejected. (Navin Sinha,J.) A.Kumar