IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2671 of 2011 NAG RAJ @ MITHILESH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 01.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 1791 of 2010 arising out of Jebanabad (Taregana) Rail P.S. Case No. 20 of 2000 registered under sections-399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code and section-(25-iB)A, 26 & 35 of the Arms Act. It would appear from perusal of the impugned order that the petitioner was all along on bail but his bail bond was cancelled on 19.09.2001 and subsequently, the petitioner suo motu surrendered before the court below on 25.08.2010. Although it is a case of gross misuse of privilege of bail but considering the conduct of the petitioner, particularly, keeping in mind that he has suo motu surrendered before the learned court below, I think it proper to release him on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, namely, Nag Raj @ Mithilesh Yadav is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sessions Trial No. 1791 of 2010 arising out of Jebanabad (Taregana) Rail P.S. Case No. 20 of 2000to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge - 2 - (F.T.C. No.-III), ) Patna subject to condition that the petitioner shall attend the trial court on each and every date for the period of nine months and if he fails to do so without any valid cause or reasons, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)