* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 108/2008 & Crl.M.A. No.934/2008 ALWAR TOURIST TRANSPORT SERVICES Petitioner Through: Mr. Jagat Rana, Advocate. versus D.C.P TRAFFIC(SW) & ANR Respondent Through: Ms. Meera Bhatia with Ms. Pooja Aganpal, Advocates for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA SHARMA ORDER % 24.01.2008 The petitioner is aggrieved by the direction of Delhi Traffic Police as contained in Annexure-A to the writ petition whereby he has been asked to deposit vehicle No.DL- IV B-2892; Make Toyota Innova, which he was found to be driving as a taxi at a speed of 70 kms/h. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that it is only.under Section 207 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 that the petitioner could have been asked to deposit the vehicle in question. The said Section is attracted if a person is found contravening the provisionsof Section 3 or Section 4 or Section 9 or Section 66 of the said Act. Admittedly, the petitioner has not been found to have Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified /T^ i violated the said provisions. In view of the above, the directions as contained in 'Annexure A' to the writ petition could not have been passed. Therefore, it is directed that the Delhi Traffic Police will not enforce the same. With these directions, the petition is disposed of. Dasti. JANUARY 24, 2008 s.pal REKHX SHARMAJ