IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURIS APPELLATE JURIS APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.2031 OF 2006 Premnath alias Kashinath. ..Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. Mr. Makarand Adkar i/b Mr. S.R.Ganbavale,Advocates for the Applicant. Mr. Rajesh More, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM :K.J.ROHEE,J. :K.J.ROHEE,J. :K.J.ROHEE,J. DATE DATE DATE :19/05/20 :19/05/20 :19/05/2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. . . Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and A.P.P. for the State. 2] Puja, daughter of Advocate Tripathi practising at Waranasi, was married with Mithilesh on 17.6.2005. After marriage she continued to reside with her parents and it was only on 13/2/2006 that she was taken by her husband, mother-in-law and the present petitioner at Dombivali, District Thane. Within a couple of months i.e. on 5.4.2006 Puja died in railway accident. Death of Puja was obviously in misterious circumstances. It was the police who informed the father of Puja about the accident. On 14.4.2006 Advocate Tripathi filed F.I.R. 3] It clearly shows that the applicant was residing with Mithilesh though it is the contention of the applicant that he was not residing at Dombivali but was residing separately at Kandiwali. Apart from that whether he was residing with Mithilesh or not, there is specific averment in the F.I.R., that the petitioner also joined the husband and the in-laws of Puja in demanding Maruti 800 Car. 4] Considering the circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. 5] The application is,therefore,dismissed. (K.J.ROHEE.J.) (K.J.ROHEE.J.) (K.J.ROHEE.J.)