IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.4510 OF 2003 PETITION NO.4510 OF 2003 PETITION NO.4510 OF 2003 ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Note, Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders Memoranda of Coram appearance, Corut’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders: ------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.S.V.Sadavarte, for the Petitioner Mrs.S.S.Bhende,AGP for the Respondent 2 to 5. Mr. K.V. Tembe, for the Respondent No.1. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 10th March, 2005 : 10th March, 2005 : 10th March, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The Respondent bank has obtained a certificate under the provisions of Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. The challenge to Section 101 has been negatived by the Division Bench of this Court. Against the certificate issued under Section 101 the petitioner is entitled to remedy by way of Revision. The petitioner did not resort to the Revisional remedy and instead chose to come directly to this Court. Considering the above and the main challenge itself no longer subsists no interference called for. It is still open to the petitioner if he is advised to prefer a Revision according to law if he has any other grievance after depositing the amount as contemplated for preferring a Revision Application. With the above observations, Writ Petition rejected. No order as to costs. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (S.P. (S.P. (S.P. KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.)