1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 102 /2010 [Rajesh Balkisan Ravidas vs. State of Maharashtra ) ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr A M Jaltare Adv.for applicant CORAM : A.P.BHANGALE, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 9, 2010. Heard learned Advocate for the applicant. The applicant seeks bail in connection with Crime No. 182/2009 registered at Sakkardata Police Station, Nagpur for offence punishable under section 395 read with section 34 IPC read further with Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. It is contended on behalf of the applicant that the accused were arrested subsequently after the occurrence, with a sum of Rs. 1400/- in their possession ; whereas it is alleged that the robbery in the sum of Rs.1,50,000 was committed by three persons including the present applicant. 2. It appears that previously the application for bail by the applicants was rejected by learned Addl. Sessions Judge Nagpur on 5.11.2009 by passing order in Misc. Cri. Application No.1983/2009 on the ground that applicants were specifically named in serious accusations. Be that as it may, although applicant appears to be aged about 22 years, has given fixed address as “Old Bidipeth, Near Boudhha Vihar, Sakkardara, Nagpur”. I 2 think, it appears insufficient information in respect of fixed residential address where the applicant can be available/located in the event he is released on bail. It is necessary for any accused applying for bail to give full particulars of his fixed residential address and give sufficient information as it would be always necessary to ensure presence of the accused at the trial. Learned Advocate states that he will furnish information as regards fixed address and file fresh application giving full particulars of the residential address of the applicant as well as proposed names of the sureties. This application is rejected for the above reasons with liberty to apply afresh. JUDGE sahare