IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39046 of 2008 SHYAM LAL RAI @ SHYAM RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.10.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Police case under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Penal Code and Sections 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Only for the reasons stated in Para 2 of the impugned order or rejection that while Counsel for the petitioner had copy of the case diary available with him and insisted for disposal of the case when despite request police would not submit case diary to the Court this Court is not persuaded to entertain the present application. This application is accordingly disposed with the direction that if the petitioner files an application within four weeks for fresh hearing of the anticipatory bail petition the court below shall proceed to decide the same afresh in accordance with law after examination of the materials in the case diary without being prejudiced by the present order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)