IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 471 of 2008 Gurmeet Singh and another …… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ……. Respondents None for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Ms. Sangeeta, Advocate on behalf of Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the respondent No.3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. None for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Ms. Sangeeta, Advocate on behalf of Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for respondent No.3. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case submitted the chargesheet against the petitioners before the Circle Officer concerned on 03/11/2008 and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit chargesheet before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been made in para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 02.04.2009 Shiv