IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.674 of 2009 Ritesh Rao @ Ritesh Kumar Gupta son of Sri Vijay Gupta resident of Muhalla Nutan Nagar, P.S. Civil Line, Under Town Gaya, District-Gaya (Bihar) ------ Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Gaya (Bihar). 4. The Officer-in-charge, Delha, P.S., District-Gaya (Bihar). 5. The Officer-in-charge, Rampur P.S., District-Gaya (Bihar). 6. The Superintendent of Police, Buxar (Bihar). 7. The Officer-in-charge, Town P.S., Buxar, District-Buxar (Bihar). 8. Sri Sachidanand Pathak son of Late Nathun Pathak, 9. Smt. Bindu Pathak wife of Sri Sachidanand Pathak, 10. Sri Rajan Pathak son of Sri Sachidanand Pathak, 11. Ranjit Pathak son of Sri Sachidanand Pathak. 12. Smt. Khusboo Rani, wife of Ritesh Rao and daughter of Sachidanand Pathak, Respondent nos. 8 to 12 are permanent residents of Muhalla-Gazodharpur, near L.B.T. College, Under Town Buxar, P.S. Buxar, District- Buxar (Bihar) and they are at present residing at Quarter No. 27/D, Railway Colony, Marshalling Yard, P.S. Delha, Under Town-Gaya, District-Gaya(Bihar). ---- Respodnents. ------------ 5. 7.1.2010 Heard Mr. B.N. Sinha ‘Suman’ for the petitioner, Mr. P.K. Verma, learned Assistant Counsel to Standing Counsel No.10, and Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Upadhyay for respondent nos. 8 to 12. The two sets of respondents have filed their counter affidavits. The petitioner claims to have married respondent no.12, her parents are not recognizing the marriage and have separated them. The writ petition has, therefore, been preferred for a direction to her parents who are respondents herein to allow her to go to her matrimonial home. It appears that the petitioner has already approached the concerned Family Court. In that view of the 2 matter; we would not like to proceed further in this matter for identical relief. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar ,J. ) (Kishore K. Mandal,J.)