1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.4107 OF 2009 Shaikh Abidoddin s/o Sk. Bashiroddin Through its GPA holder. PETITIONER. V E R S U S Shaikh Parvin Ahmed s/o Sk. Ibrahim and an. RESPONDENTS. Shri S.S. Thombre, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J : DATE : 2nd JULY, 2009 PER COURT :- 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the con- current findings of fact vide which the learned trial Court has allowed the application filed by the respondent/plaintiff for temporary injunction and order passed by the Appellate Court thereby dismissing the appeal. 2. Scope of interference in concurrent findings is very limited unless it is found that the findings are perverse, it is not possible for this Court to interfere with it. 3. In that view of the matter, no perversity or infirmity could be found with the approach adopted by the trial court so as to warrant interference in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. As such, the petition is rejected. Needless to state that observations made by the Courts below are only with respect to grant of temporary injunction. ( B. R. GAVAI ) JUDGE aaa/wp4107.09 ***