:<r^. r-^' ^ c^- u-^- SIN8LE BEf»eH IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W;P.(Cri)NO. fi^^ /2010 PETITIONER ^ ^••; '^^/^ •^w ^' <^y } ^//'(y ^ ^~ f.^' ^" ^^. 1. Dev Kumar Lahre, S/o Shri Bali Ram Lahre, aged about 36 years, R/o Village Pamgarh^ Janjgir-Champa^ (C.G.)« 2. Yashmin Akhtar, D/o Md. Yakub, aged aobut 20 years, R/o village Tilda., post - Tilda, Raipur, (C.G.). 3.^abban Khan, S/o Md. Hafiz Khan, aged about 3'5 years.l R/o Village- Aarang, Raipur, (C.G.). 4.Habbib Khan, S/o Md. Subhan Khan Aged about 43 years, R/o Vilkige Paragaon, Arang, Raipur, (C.G.), 5. Urmila Suryavashi, D/o Shri Goverdhan Prasad, aged about 27 years, R/o village Pakariya, post - Kodabhat, Shivrinarayan, Janjgir-Champa, (C.G.). ^ 6. Kamal Narayan Banjare, S/o Karam Say Banjare,. aged about 40 years, R/o Mohatra Kasdol, Raipur, (C.G.). 7. Chaman Lal Sahu, S/o Nathu Ram Sahu., aged about 41 years, R/o Viliage - Biida, Post - Buda, Kasdol, Raipur, (C.G.). ^ 8. Dhannu Kumar Sahu, S/o Manrakhan Sahu, Aged about 40 years, Village Bachara, Post - D^makhada, Si^ma^aOr).' ^^-Ks^f^' ^ v VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2: M/s Mahila Jagrukta Abhiyan, Through its State Director Slirl Ramji Prasad Jaisv/al, S/o I.ate @— feg 3:/ 4. ^ 5: 6. 7. 8. <^ Gaiies]? Prasad Jaiswal, R7o Dube Complex, First Floor, Pratapur Naka, P.0. - Ambikapur, Distt. - Sarguja, Ramji Prasad Jaiswal^ S/o Late Ganesh Prasad Jaiswal., R/o Dube Complex, First Floor, Pratapur Naka, P.0. - Ambikapur, Distt. — Sarguja, The Director General of PQlice^ iChhattisgarh., Police Headquarter, Raiupr(C.G.) The Collector, Raipur (C.G.) Tbe Collector, Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) The Superintendent ofPolice, Raipuir The Suerintendent of Police, Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) r"" WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. .'f^^^-^%L ^ ^ ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cr) No. 6381 of2010 PETmQNERS RESPONDENTS Dev Kumar Lahre & Others VERSUS The State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Acinihotri. J. Present: Ms. Renu Kochar, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 11th day of November, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, submits that the petitioners do not want to press any other relief in the matter. However, the petitioners may be permitted to make a fresh representation. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event, the representation is made, the Collector, Raipur shall look into the grievance made by the petitioners and take appropriate steps in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. 3. Itis ordered as prayed for. 4. In view of foregoing, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Arun