IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24714 of 2011 1.Sudhir Singh Mukhiya son of Vijay Singh @ Lucy Singh 2.Lallu Singh son of Tanik Singh 3.Ghutuk Singh @ Ghutua Singh son of Shekhar Singh. All residents of village-Gonama, P.S.- Harnaut, Dist.-Nalanda. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 27.7.2011. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The allegation as per the first information report is that the informant made a complaint regarding payment of wages under the scheme of NAREGA and on being offended by such complaint, petitioners are alleged to have abused the informant calling her caste name. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that apart from section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3(i) (x)(xi) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 all other sections are bailable in nature. It is submitted that from the first information report itself it would transpire that insult or intimidation to the informant was not made in a place within public view and, thus, ingredients of the offence under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act would not be attracted. Taking into consideration the aforesaid submissions let the petitioner, namely, 1.Sudhir Singh Mukhiya, 2.Lallu Singh and 3. Ghutuk Singh @ Ghutua Singh in the event of their arrest or 2 surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/communication of the order be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda in connection with S.C./S.T. P.S. Case No.8 of 2010. Md.S. ( Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)