^- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. SILASPVR W.P.fSlNo. 6969 of 2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Smt. Indu MaUik, aged about 43 years, W/o Shri Suiul MalUk, Lecturer (EngUsh), Qovenunent Higher Secondaiy School, Selud Block - Patan, R/o MIG II, 306 Amdi Nagar, Hudco, Bhilai, Distnct Dwg (C.G.) Versus 1 State Govt. ofChhattisgarh, Through : The Secretaiy, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 The Director, Directorate of Public Instructions, Cbliattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The District Education OfBcer, District Dm^ (C.G.) 4. Joiut Director, Treasuiy, Accounts aad Pension, Raipur (C.G.) (Writ Petitloa uaderArticle 226 ofthe ConstituUon oflndlat Ap^earance: Shri Rakesh Anthony, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Pradeep Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. ORAL ORDBR (22.11.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard on admission. Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that flie petitioner has passed M.Ed. examiuation on her own expenses, therefore, shc is entitled to receive two advauce increnients according to cireulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also submits fhat iu many identical inatters, fhe petitions have been allowed ia terms of the order passed in the case of yashuxuit Kumar Bheuw/thmd Vs. Stunicipal Corporation. Zturg and anothcr {2006 ffQ MPJK-CG 96J. He subxuts that fhe case of fhe petitioner is squarely covered by the said Judgment. This lcgat position is not disputed by fhe learaed counsel for the State. However, he submits fhat fhe order may be passed ia term.s offhe said judgment, but it shaU be subjected \ to verification regarding petitioner's such quaUfication. Shyna W.P.<SYNo.6969 of2007 Accordingly, fhis writ petition is allowed iu terms of fhe oider passed iu case of Yashwcint Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Muniapal Corporation, Dwg cmd arwther (Supra) subject to vertfication of the facts as to whether the petitioner had acquired M.Ed. Examination Certificate on her own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether slie has been paid two advance iacreinents or not. The petition stands finatly disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ^-- --L--'~—.^'-:;^'t3^iftdiij^ "