^^ec:^, 1 ^"^T ^jl^td^, 'S^ftWTS, f^<r{l^^< MWWt «»*11<t» •^200 ^TT^T TR^ ((ic<iTl<sl<^) 3TT^T ^T T^'ii4i '^STT 3TI^?T sft^iqT NNN^' ^?HW ^f^T ^TT^T WritPet1fcipn(SlNo.5718/2008 PETITIONBR R.P. N^ik, years, Chhatti|sgarh Town, Chhat.tti|sgaiii 1 Versus RBSPONDBNTS 1, Chhatti^garh State Electricity Board through Secretary, Daaganiya, Raipur, 2. 3. 4. the Chhatt^ Chief Electric^ Superii| Chhatt^ Chhs atti^garh ;f I Engmeer (RR),Chliattisgarh State |[ty Board, Raipur, Chliattisgarh l^tending Engi&eer (O & M), .atti|sgarh State Electdcity Board, Raipur, .atti^garh Executi Electrid Writ Petitioa U/A 22| S.B. HON'BLE SHm DHIRENDl 16.10.2008 Shri Sanjay Kii. Agrawal, Shri Yashwant Suigh respondents/ Chhatdsgaiii Stat^ Heai'd. Grievan.ee of the petition^ as Juiiior Engiiieer iii tlie Ch] conmiunicated adverse remarkd the Supeilo.tendin.g Engraeer f(| cbl^f<r1^1^ HiH<n1 if f^^ <P»i^i< ^r ^tRm ^TT^T S/o Shri K.R. Naik, aged about 39 sresentiy posted as Junior Eugineer, State Electdcity Board, Shakti Shakti, District Janjgir-Chaaipa, ^e Engmeer, Chhattisgarh State ^ty Board, Maliasaniund, Chhattisgarh & of the Cosistitutioa of Is&dia EtA. MISHRA., J. couusel for tiie petitioner. Thakur, Advocate appears for the ^ Electodcity Board. T is tliat tlie petitioner, who is workiag [lattisgarh State Electricity Board, was vide Annexure P-1. dated 23.5.2007 by ) & M), C.S.E.B, Raipur. The petitioner XI-HG—78 3TT^I ^)T f<^Jch '^2TT ^^\ 9^^i<=h , ^ .^k^ > ^v. ^"^ ^l^tQl^, 8>tl1-H^|(o, fs|dl<Lt^< HW<^t »»*iich """"""""""""""""""""""""^ 200 'sn^r 'q^r (^f^sf^r) ^Rrrw^fin ^IT^T ^ made his representation agaicj Annexure P-6, dated 31.7.20( considered, he agaui addressec^ 14.12.2007. However, his reprc his confidential report has not b| Leaaied counsel for tlic petition may be disposed of consider fhe representation rexnarks in his confidential re speci&ed period. Shri Yashyant Singh Tl C,S,E.B,/respondents submits petitioner agaiast tlie comint confideiitial report, shall be dec| In view of above submisl parties, nofh.nig sur^ives iii tlii^ disposed of 1st the aforesaid communication vide |7, When liis representation was not a reramder of Annexure P-7, dated |sentation agamst tlie adverse entry ia ^en considered, petitiouer submits thiat tiie iiistaiit |wifh direction to the respondeuts to |f tlie petitioner against his adverse toort and decide tlie saoie witlxin fhe CMCif<n<fli 'HTH^ff ^f 'fe^t if^l^K '^'3tRR3TT^T [.akur, Advocate appears on behalf of lliat the representation subniitted by tlie bnication of adverse remark m his ^ded wifhio. a period of two niontih.s, sions inade by leanied counsel for tlie petition aad the petition is accordingly Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge