t- INTHEHIGMCOURTOR6MHATTISGARHATBILASPUR MCCNo f^Q/20to (WA No-l 48/201 Q)' t^ OivisionBencl :..L- APPLICANTS7 RETITIONERS 1 .^ Smt. Rukmani SuryaVanshi w/o Shri Puranik Lal, aged about 47 yeaFS'-; ^ , .\ ^: : , , . : •Smt. Shashi Gautam W/o Shri Mannu Singh, aged about 43 years,: :,:,•••:;-•:•.^,, Srrit. Laxmi Verma W/o Kali '^^' 3.. ':1T 5. ^ \ Ram Verma^ aged aboyt 44 years,.:: • -:, : ' ;/ Smt ReKha Khobragade W/o Shri S. Khobragade, aged about 37years. ' . , Smt. Deosir Mankar W/o Shri Ghanshyam Singh aged about ,45years,^ " .'::',:'':.' :':';'''.:' Smt. Shyama Gaur W/o Shri Ram^hilawan, aged about 37 years . . : : : , .''.,•• Smt. Savitri Pradhari W/o Shri Sadashivageaabout41years, Appellants/Retitioners 1 to 7 posted ,as Angan badi wcirkers. block Dondilohara, Disft.Durg(G.G.) , ^^^.^-^^^ \ 1 ^ iii!'a: %BSB: sMMIIglSSI :'^ :s) RESPONDENTS f ,&,,' • -Smt Keja , Thakur W/o Shri Kanhaiya SingM aged abQut 41 years, -• ,: 9, Smt; LSta Verma W/o Shri Phool singh, aged about 39 years 10; Smt. Usha Sharma VW6 Shri Ashok Sharma aged about 38 years 11. Smt. Shashi Agarawal W/o Shri Satya Kumar aged about 42 years :' ,• Appellant/Petitioners 8 to 11 Angan badi worker, block Saja, Distt.-Durg(C.G.) VERSUS Bal Vikas PariyQJria Adhjkari, Village Dayndi(B.D.) Distt. Durg ::(C.G.}: -: ; .:' ;-;; ::; Bal Vikas Pariyojna Adhikari, Village Saja <B.D.) Distt. Durg (C.G.) ' . :' : President/Ghairman, General Administration ' Standing Committte, District Panchayat Durg Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.) . . B ^ ,A y 4. Ghief Executive Officer District Panchayat Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.) 5. Commissioner, Directorate of Women and Child Development, RaipurC. G. Q^- S.tate of Chhattisgarh through The Secretary Women and Child Development Mantralaya RaipurChhattisgarh 7,.. Smt Kamla Baghel President District Panchayat Durg Tahsil andDistrict Durg(C.G.) On behalfofthe applicants itissubmittedasunder: ^.. HIGHCOURT OFCHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.c.Gjtfassesoio DB: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.M.QUDDUSI& HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEN.K.AGARWAL.JJ APPLICANTS: RESPONDENTS: SmtRukmaniSurvanshi&others Vs. Bal Vikas Pariyogna Adhikari & others Appearance: Mr. Amrito Das.counsel fbrthe petitioner ORALORDER 02.08.2010 Heard. This M.C.C. has been filed for restoration of Writ Appeat No.148 of 2010 which wasdismissed for non-prosecution on 05.07.2010. Having heard leamed counsel for the petihoners and for the reasonsstated inthe M.C.C., itisallowed. ^tecordingly, Writ Appeal no.148/2010 is restored to its original number. SA'- LM-Quddusi Judge .^ Sd/- N.K.Agarawal Judge