RSA 20/2006 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P. G. AGARWAL Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This second appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the appe llate court in Title Appeal No. 21/2001 whereby the appeal was dismissed and the judgment and decree passed by the trial court in Title Suit No. 277/93 was affi rmed. The substantial question of law as raised by the appellant before us is th at the suitland described in the plaint is altogether different from theland cov ered by sale deed No. 571/94. We have perused the written statement filed by thepresent appellant that no such plea was raised in the written statement and such a plea cannot be allowed to b e raised for the first time in the second appeal. The learned counsel has further submitted that the ad-velorem court fees were no t paid of Rs. 5000/- although that amount was mentioned in the Bainapatra. ***********************