IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.617 of 2006 ASHGAR ALI Versus MOSTT.HASAN TARA KHATOON & ORS ----------- 4 24/10/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the opposite parties. Counsel for the opposite parties has raised preliminary objection with regard to maintainability of this civil revision application by stating that the impugned order is an inseverable order arising out of a partition suit and since this civil revision application on account of non compliance of the order dated 7.1.2008 has stood dismissed as against opposite party nos. 1 and 5 to 8, this application as a whole has become incompetent. Counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to explain this aspect. He however submits that the order of this Court dated 7.1.2008 had been complied on 11.1.2008 and as such the dismissal of this Civil Revision Application as against Opposite party Nos. 1 and 5 to 8 as recorded in the office notes is itself incorrect. 2 This Court on perusal of records would find that the peremptory order dated 7.1.2008 had not been actually complied and there is an order to this effect on 30.1.2008 that this civil revision application as against opposite party nos. 1 and 5 to 8 has stood dismissed. That being so, this civil revision application has become incompetent and is accordingly dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. ) Abhay Kumar