HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.16438 of 2010 Dated: 21-07-2010 Between: Balkrishna Rao Pawar. … Petitioner And The Joint Collector, Mahabubnagar District & others. … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.16438 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed, questioning the action of the 1st respondent-appellate authority under the provisions of the A.P. (Telangana Area) Inam Abolition Act, 1955, in not passing orders on the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order, dated 28th of May 2010, passed in Proceedings in Case No.B/918/1998, by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Wanaparthy, and also to set aside the said order. By the order, dated 28th May 2010, passed in Case No.B/918/1998, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Wanaparthy, has passed orders, granting occupancy rights in favour of respondents 2 to 5 under the provisions of the A.P. (Telangana Area) Inams Abolition Act, 1955. As against the said orders, the petitioner carried the matter by way of appeal before the 1st respondent under Section 24 of the Act. In this writ petition, it is the grievance of the petitioner that no orders are passed by the appellate authority either in the interlocutory application or in the appeal, and on the other hand, the respondents are taking steps to alienate the property in question. At the stage of admission, Sri V.V.Narasimha Rao, Advocate, took notice on behalf of respondents 2 to 5. When the matter is taken up today, he has filed an affidavit of the 2nd respondent on behalf of respondents 3 to 5 also, with a specific averment that they will not alienate the land to any third parties pending disposal of appeal by the 1st respondent, preferred by the petitioner against the order, dated 28th of May 2010, passed in Case No.B/918/1998. In view of the affidavit, in which, respondents 2 to 5 have undertaken not to alienate the property till the disposal of appeal by the 1st respondent, the grievance of the petitioner is redressed. In that view of the matter, by recording the said undertaking, which is filed on behalf of respondents 2 to 5, this writ petition is disposed of. However, it is open for the appellate authority to dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioner in accordance with law. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 21st July 2010 ajr