IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28460 of 2010 DHEERAJ KUMAR SAH . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02/ 05.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was lodged in connection with theft committed at Bishnu Hotel from Room No. 1 of which two mobiles and Rs. 100/- cash were stolen and from Room No. 5 one Laptop, one mobile and Rs. 1200/- cash were stolen. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that co accused Chandan Paswan was arrested and he made confessional statement and also stated that he had sold Laptop to the petitioner and mobile to one Sikander Kumar and hence both of them were made accused. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that Sikander Kumar filed an application for bail bearing Cr. Misc. No. 20775 of 2010 which was allowed by this court on 17.06.2010 and similar is the case of the petitioner also, as the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since March-2010. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. Let petitioner, namely Dheeraj Kumar be released on bail on furnishing 2 bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Begusarai Town, P. S Case No. 73/10 ( G. R No. 464 of 2010) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Ranjan (S. N Hussain, J.)