IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2494 of 2007 Date of decision: 20th October, 2008 Amrit Singh Sembhi … Petitioner Versus Smt. Raj Kumari … Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. M.L. Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Salar, Advocate for the Respondent. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) During the course of arguments, the counsel for the petitioner was unable to assail the findings of the Appellate Authority in para No.16 and has stated that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition in case one year time is granted to him. Thereafter, statements of the petitioner – tenant and counsel for the respondent have been recorded. As I intend to affirm the findings recorded by the Appellate Authority in para 16, a prayer has been made to withdraw the present petition. The prayer of the petitioner is accepted in terms of the statement made by him. Petitioner – tenant, on identification by his counsel Mr.M.L. Saini, has made a separate statement that he shall vacate the premises in case one year time is granted to him. He has also stated that he shall file an undertaking to this effect in the Court of Rent Controller. In view of the statement made by the petitioner – tenant, one year time is granted to him subject to furnishing an undertaking before Rent Controller, as stated by him in his statement. It has been made clear to the Civil Revision No.2494 of 2007 petitioner – tenant that in case the undertaking is not adhered to, his eviction shall follow forthwith. Hence, present revision petition stands dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the statement made by the petitioner. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE October 20, 2008. rps 2