1 S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.5155/06 Date : 17.11.2006 HON'BLE MR. SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. Rajesh Panwar for the applicant. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor for State. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that prima facie it would appear from perusal of the complaint that allegations are not made infact against the applicant. He submits that prior six years of the marriage of the deceased, the applicant was married and she is in government employment and working as teacher elsewhere, therefore, the applicant's case requires consideration. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. I have considered the submissions made before me and carefully gone through the material available on record and the statements recorded in this case. 2 Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I deem it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest of applicant Kamla Devi D/o Chhoga Ram W/o Govind Ram by I.O./S.H.O. in FIR No.230/2006 P.S. Basni, she shall be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- alongwith two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of Investigating Officer on the following conditions:- (i)That she shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii)That she shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and; (iii)That she shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vij