H @ @NQQE @EMEH Cf/fga/f-d REFORE THF‘. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S)N0.”0?(/2006 (SB). PETITIONER tr” B. L. Naik, aged about 54 rs; S/o Shri P. L. aik. O/o. Executive Engineer. Tanduia Water RESPONDENTS f. 1) State of Chhattisgarh . f Through: Secretary; Water Resources Department Mantralaya. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur .Raipur (C.G.). The Exeutve Engineer, Tandula Water. a Resources Divieion. Durg. P. O. \and Distt. Durg(C.G.). WRIT ‘ PETITION UNDER ARTICLF) 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION FOR 1SSUANCE OF A WRTT OF CERTTORARE &. MANDAMUS AND ANY OTHER WRIT] ORDER/ DIRECTION [n— ARTICULARS OF THE FETITIONER. AS given in cause title. p 2 PARTICULARS OF THE R As given in cause titlet L11 w l1: :> i. Za 2 a. J2 i Resources DiviSion, Durg, P. O. ‘glnd‘D‘i‘SV‘ft. j D urg “(’C‘TG . ) ;j VERSUS respondent No.1 and in turn, he be dir cted to decide the same in accordance with law, to which Smt. Ahuja, learned Dy. ovt, Adv, for the State has no objection. Having heard learned counsel or the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, witho t expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the petitioner is allowed to make a detailed representation to respondent No.1 raising all the grievances within 10 da Sefrom today along with copy of this petition and in turn, respondent No.1 to decid the representation of the petitioner within a period of 3O days from the date of rec ipt'of representation in accordance with law after considering all the grievances rai ed by the petitioner. With the direction aforesaid. th petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.31 8/06 & l.A. No.760’l/06 also stands disposed of. l Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge ‘/ / RT.O. XI—HC-78 3am, Wm,W umm ‘ UWw’L: .9. m 200 31 W EmW . WWW WW (W) mm‘&’f€‘2°rri%rw > wwwm Waf—r‘(mm ‘\, 10.8.2006 Shri BR, Ghosh, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt, Anju Ahuja. Dy, Govt. Advocate for the State on advance copy. Heard By this petition, the petitionei has chaiienged her transfer order dated 4.7.2006 (Annexure P—1) whereby he h as been transferred from Durg to Bemetarar The main ground of challenge is that the petitioner is suffering from the disease of paratysis and taking reguiiar treatment at Jawharlai Nehru Hospital & Research Centre, Sector-9, Bhilai and the place where petitioner has been transferred proper medical facility is nct available. Moreover, the petitioner’s wife is working as Teacher in BSP School; hilai and his daughters are also studying at Bhilai and if the petitioner is forced toj in at the transferred place, then same will be prejudicial to the health of the petitione . Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in the circumstances, the petitioner may be llowed to make a detailed representation to