IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1205 OF 2006 Shivaji Gangadhar Patil....Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors..Respondents Mr. Madhav Jamdar for the Petitioner Ms. Mugdha Jadhav, AGP for Respondents 1 to 6. Mr.Shailesh Dalvi i/b. Mulla & Mulla & C.B.& Coroe for Respondent No.8 Mr. R.V. Govilkar for Respondent No.11 CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & F.I. REBELLO & F.I. REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE: 15TH JUNE,2006 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. This appears to be a classic case where attempts are made to see that the order dated 13th August, 2002 is not enforced, inspite of the fact that the application was made by the petitioner to the Registrar to enforce the order. 3. In these circumstances we direct the respondent No.3 to appoint an Officer under Section 79 of the M.C.S. Act to comply with the order dated 13th August, 2002 in Appeal No.1 of 2002 within a period of four weeks from today. Respondent No.3 to file compliance report before this Court within 3 weeks thereafter. 4. Rule made absolute accordingly. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J). J). J).