•innB^^ CJ THEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. '5°>2^of2002 1 :'!. Petitioner Respondent ^' >ur Santosh Rumar Kewat, S/o Late Shankar Lal Kewat Aged about - 25 years R/o- Jarhabhata, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. VERSUS .^^ 1. Sub Divisional OfEcer Post & Telegram ( Now Telecommunication Deptt.) Ambikapur, Surguja, C.G. . .••''^y/ 2. General Manager, -?^''," !^, ./<• Telecommumcation, C.G Circle y^-'-'y G.E. Road, Raipur. ^,?' -\s",^' AS'.*" ..^' y Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constifaition of India 3. Umonoflndia Through: Secretary Telecommunication, New DeBu -^" -^ Xi-HC—78 •y^ ^|<i|c1--!, »" ^ 32..^/. o 7 TT^^' (TT^H^^^' CTR^R? BI^TOS? ^fiwgftff aiit'" te4h wf^i -^ fgiA •(f^re^T ^a-mTOs^r 17/4/2003 Smt. Hamida Siddique fdtr the petitioner. i Shri V.V.S. Murthv. Addl. -Standing Coi.msel for Union t)f Indla. 1 Heard. •This petition is uleiil by fhe petitioner for 1•ompassionate appointnient. i Return has been filed. Counsel for respondent/pnion oflndia has very fairly I ^! stated in the return at pai'agraplis 5.5 and 5.7 that the i J- UE •' .. betition of the petitioner caiiih in the office of Telecom, pistrict Engineer, Raigai-h jsn 22/12/1995 alongwith 1 • . S Linwillingness letter and ra.edlc.al certificate of his elder ibrother Shri Ramsunder Kewal death certificate(photo 'opy) of late Shri Shaiikai'lal Ke^vai. On perusal of The case, i blank application form was is^ued to the petitioner, which !was filled in and submitted on 3 >/' 12/ 1995 in the office. The ps— +• -HC—78 ^sr ^TPTRTT, ^aTCPTs, lcicni^y _.....^f..32.^/!..^ 31. R^7(" SII^'^T ~^l T^N; •'i:-i' •^it'S^i S)u(c?! 1 •g^traT ^fta' 3i7^l ^-n ^i^i^l^i'l <4H<vii ^i iS^E <i^ S^f 3SI 's japplication of the petitioner -^as submitted-to the Chief peneral Maiiager, Teleconi, M.IJ'. Teleconi Circle, Bhopal on ^5/1/1996. Due to difference in death certificate of Shri phankai-lal Kewat, application ojf thc petitioner was retui~ned cie ieiiiT;r dated 23/4/1998. Necessan" con'ecnons in the ^pplication of the petitioner wasj made and again resubmitted 1:0 the Chief General Manafeer on 20/7/1998. Two "epresentations ofthe petitioner|were received in the office on J13/8/1997 and 20/10/1997.| In this regard, the elder jbrother of the petitioner wa^ asked to subrait certain Llocuments, but the saine have hot been submitted eifher bv jtlie petitioner or his elder broth^r. Learned couiisel for Ubion of Iiidia subiuits that i i pertain forniuJaties are requirec| t.o be done by the petitioner ^nd he is not rendermg due c^-operation. If fhe petitioner jivants employment; he must rei| der due co-operatlon. "S^ -^Wv'M, fSVWW, T^ireHT r"""""""""""""""""""""""""""^ 2< ^ ^fr^r' u '' 0*^9-ff \ SH^[ "^q? ("^^1^^) ^^?; ^i i^-n^' ^^•{'i '^ji^^l ?r^'J-]^J-;r^ TwiW: fiN a^si «~"5 — ^S^S^SI ^_.-U-L ^i.iraqii wrcfl ^w Tfeen ^? siRw ss 1 Let the petitioner appea^ before the Telecom District L . -. . . ,-...[. Engineer, Raigai-h aiid do the |legal fon'iiulaties, who shall i itlecide the inatter as earlv as pibssible ureferablv within one iiionth froin the date of appcart ilm. in.cc of the pctitioner before •1iisposea With the aforesaid ob^en'ations, this petition is sed ofadlU; ^ -^ UW.^^,^ ^^ yctaA! %UA^W i Cx>nsequeatly, M.W.P.! No.541/02 ai-id I.A. ^0.2034/02 stand disposed of. 1 " ' ' Certified cop}r as per rud^s. - ' Fakhruddin Judge