1 N.1907.08.sxw JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NO. 1907 OF 2008 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 351 OF 2008 IN AWARD DATED 18TH NOVEMBER 2005 Citifinancial Consumer Finance India Ltd. ... Decree Holder. Orig.Claimant. V/s. Kartar Singh Bhatti & Ors. ... Judg. Debtors. Orig. Respondents. Mr. Samir Suryawanshi i/b. Mohit Gadkari & Co. for the Decree Holder. None for the Judgment Debtors. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 5th JANUARY 2011. P.C. :- Affidavit of service is filed. Respondent No.1 is served. Though Bailiff’s report of September 2010 shows that Respondent No.2 was not found, no steps have been taken to serve Respondent No.2 again. 2. Today, learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks more time. Request is rejected as the Award is of 2005. 2 N.1907.08.sxw 3. As Respondent No.1 has remained absent, Notice under Order XXI Rule 22 of C.P.C. is made absolute so far as Respondent No.1 is concerned. Execution to proceed so far as Respondent No.1 is concerned. Notice under Order XXI Rule 22 of C.P.C. is not served on Respondent No.2. Hence, Notice is accordingly dismissed. Consequently, decree cannot be executed against Respondent No.2. The Execution Application stands dismissed so far as Respondent No.2 is concerned. There shall be no order as to costs. (R.Y. GANOO, J.)