IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-5980 of 2010 Date of Decision:31.3.2010 Anil .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjeev Sura, Addl. A.G. Haryana. Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) As per the allegation in the FIR, injury No.4 is attributed to the present petitioner, which is stated to be simple in nature. The petitioner is in custody since 19.11.2009. Bail to the satisfaction of chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridabad. 31.3.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE