MP 1 WP6915_10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6915 OF 2010 Rajvansh Jagnarayan Singh and another ... Petitioners Versus Arvind Ratilal Mehta and others ... Respondents Mr. M. J. Jamadar for Petitioners. Mr. Mandar Soman for Respondent No. 1. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. MONDAY, MARCH 28, 2011 P. C. : The petitioner challenges the order dated 11th June 2010 in Chamber Summons No. 20 of 2010 vide which the Chamber Summons filed by the respondent for amendment of the plaint came to be allowed. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that from the perusal of the prayer clause which is now permitted to be inserted, it would reveal that the entire nature of the suit has been changed. 3. The learned Counsel for the respondent-plaintiff fairly concedes that the respondent-plaintiff does not press the amendment insofar as amendments to the prayer clauses in the plaint are concerned. 4. In that view of the matter, the petition is partly allowed. The impugned order insofar as it allows the amendment to the prayer clause is concerned, stands quashed and set aside. MP 2 WP6915_10 5. Needless to state that the respondent would always be at liberty to file a separate suit for the reliefs sought to be brought on record by way of amendment. (B.R. GAVAI, J)