1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANTABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2234 OF 2009 with CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2501 OF 2009 Ramesh s/o Mansingh Patil ..Applicant. V E R S U S The State of Maharashtra. ...Respondent. Shri P.N. Kutti, Advocate for petitioner. Shri K.M. Suryawanshi, APP for the State. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 21ST JULY, 2009. PER COURT :- 1. Heard both the counsel and learned Assistant Government Pleader Shri K.M. Suryawanshi. The application moved by the complainant Babulal through his Advocate to assist the Assistant Government Pleader is allowed. 3- Vandana lodged a report against her husband and inlaws giving rise to offence under section 307, 498-A, 323, 504 r.w. 34 of Indian Penal Code at Soygaon Police Station, implicating the accused-applicant. Marital status of Vandana with Jitendra is not in controversy. It is also not in controversy that present applicant- accused has no relations with the said Vandana or with her husband Jitendra Patil. There was allegations of political rivalry and the accused-applicant feels that based on such rivalry, he has been involved in the matter. Taking statement of Vandana, at this stage will not logically require the custody of the accused-applicant for any interrogation. In the situation, application is allowed as under :- 2 i. The accused-applicant Ramesh s/o Mansingh Patil, in the event of his arrest, be released on his furnishing P.R. Bond and surety in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rs. Fifteen thousand ). ii. Accused-applicant shall not live within the jurisdiction of Taluka Jalgaon for a period of one year. He will furnish his address with phone number to the investigator of his place of stay. iii Accused-applicant shall report the concerned police of Soygaon Police Station on every Sunday between 10.00 a.m to 06.00 p.m till filing of the charge sheet. Accused shall not influence the witnesses or tamper with the prosecution. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. ) **** aaa/2234.09