o :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19Th DAY OF DECEMBER 2011 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. L. MANJUNATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJULU WRIT APPEAL Noa6424-64361201 1 IEDN-EXJ BETWEEN: RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES 4Th BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE REPTED. BY ITS REGISTRAR. .APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHIVAKUMAR S BADAWADAGI, ADV.,) AND: I. BHESIDADIYA Sb. CHIRAGKUMAR CHINILAL AGE: 21 YEARS, OCC:2ND YEAR BAMS STUDENT RIO. B.M. KANKANWADY AYURVEDIC COLLEGE, SHAHAPUR, BELGAUM. 2. GOSAI Sb. DEVANG TANSUKHGIRI AGE: 20 YEARS, 0CC: 2ND YEAR BAMS STUDENT RiO. B.V. SANGHA AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE, BAGALKOT, DIST: BAGALKOT. 3. PRASHANT KUMAR MANOJ MISHRA AGE: 20 YEARS, 0CC: 2ND YEAR BAMS STUDENT R/O. B.V. SANGHA AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE, BAGALKOT, DIST: BAGALKOT. 4. PRAJAPATI Sb. SANGEESHKUMAR RAJESHBHAI AGE: 22 YEARS, 0CC: 2ND YEAR BAMS STUDENT R/O. B.V. SANGHA AYURVEDIC MEDICAL :2: COLLEGE. BAGALKOT, 01ST: BAGALKOT. 5. NEERAJ 5/0. DEVANAND CHOUDHARI AGE: 22 YEARS, 0CC: 2ND YEAR BAMS STUDENT R/O. S.G.V.AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE, BELGAUM 6. AZARUDDIN S/O. JUMAL TRUSGES AGE: 22 YEARS, 0CC: 2ND YEAR BAMS STUDENT R/0. S.G.V.AYURVEDIC MEDICAL. COLLEGE, (BELLUNGAR) BELGAUM 7. SAVAT NISAR YNUSABHAI Sb. SAVAT YUNUSABHAI AGE: 21 YEARS. 0CC: 2ND YEAR BAMS STUDENT R/O. SDM TRUST AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE. TERADAL. 01ST: BELGAUM 8. BAGANE SMITA RAJENDRA D/O. RAJENDRA BAGAME AGE: 20 YEARS, 0CC: 2ND YEAR BAMS STUDENT RIO. SDM TRUST AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE, TERADAL, DIST: BELGAUM 9. BHARONE NIKETAN SHVAJI Sb. SHIVAJI BHARANE AGE: 21 YEARS. OCC:2ND YEAR BAMS STUDENT RIO. SDM TRUST AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE, TERADAL. fIST: BELGAUM 10. CHAVARNE ADADESH RAMACHANDRA 5/0. RAMACHANDRA Cl-IAWARE. AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC:2ND YEAR BAMS STUDENT R/O. 5DM TRUST AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE, TERADAL, DIST: BELGAUM II. MAHESHKUMAR SUBHAS BIRAJDUR 5/0. SUBHAS BUIRAJEER AGE: 21 YEARS, OCC:2ND YEAR BAMS STUDENT RIO. SDM TRUST AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE, TERADAL, DIST: BELGAUM (2. ARJUN C. Sb. CHENDRABOSE AGE: 21 YEARS. OCC:2ND YEAR BAMS STUDENT RIO. SIVAYOGESHWAR RURAL AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE. INCHAL, S :3: DIST: BELGALYM 13. SUNIN VARGER S/O. VARGES AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC:2ND YEAR BAMS STUDENT R/O. SIVAYOGESHWAR RURAL AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE, INCHAL, DIST: BELGAUM 14. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDiA BY ITS SECRETARY TO MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT OF INDIAN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE & HOMEOPATHY jAYUSHJ (EDUCATION POLICY SECTION) INDIAN RD. CROSS. SOCIETY ANNEXE BUILDING NO.1, RED CROSS ROAD, NEW DEHLI-1000i IS. CENTRAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN MEDICINE REPTED. BY ITS SECRETARY, NO.:61-65, INSTITUTIONAL AREA, OPP. D BLOCK, JANAKAPURI, NEW DELHI-i 10058 16. B.M. KANKANAWADY AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE. SHAHAPUR, BELGAUM. 17. B.V. SANGHAS AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE. BAGALKOT, D1ST: BAGALKOT. IS. SGV AYURVED1C MEDICAL COLLEGE, BELGAUM, IBELLUNGARI DIST: BELGAUM. 19. SDM TRUST AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE. TERADAL, DIST: BELGAUM. 20. SHREE SIVAYOGESHWAR RURAL AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE, INCHAL,, DLST: BELGAUM. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAMESH.I.ZIRALI ADV. FOR C/R2. R3. R7. RB. R9. RIO. RI ii er 4 THESE WRiT :\PPEALS FiLED F S.D OF THE EARN A F \EA HR 1 I-I tuUR1 \c. F PRA INu rU L \SiDL 1 HE DRDFR DATED 19 10’201 I PASSED B\ THE I EARNED SINGI E It DOE \I AIDE i\ \\ P N( o D 10 DPi 1 \\D j c 1 D Do I (EDNEX). THESE APPEALS LOMING UN FOR U RDERS THIS DAY. K,L.MANJUNATH, 3, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The appellant/university is challenging the legality and correctness of the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.63810/2011 and W.P. Nos.63815-63826/20l HEDN-EXI dated 19. 1.0.2011 wherein the appellant/ university was directed to declare the results of the examination held during JuneLJulv 201 1 in which the respondents 1 to 13 have appeared. 3, The learned counsel for the respondents submit tha.t, the ord.er of the learned Single Judge may be set aside and the.. Writ Petition filed by them may be 4 :5: dismissed in view .of the amendment brought into the Universities Act in 2006. Accordingly, these Writ Appeals are allowed and the judgment of the learned Single Judge is set aside and consequently, the Writ Petition filed by the respondents is dismissed. Sd/ 3UDGE Sc!! JUDGE RKK/