1 S.B.Civil Execution First Appeal No.6/2007 Shanker Lal and another. vs. Brij Narayan Agarwal. Date : 20.9.2007 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.JK Chanda, for the appellants. - - - - - Heard. It is an admitted case that the appeal has been preferred against the original decree in which no interim stay order was granted by the appellate court. In the execution proceedings, the appellants sought time on the ground that the appellant wants to obtain stay order from the High court. The appellants' other contention was that the attachment order has been passed to attach the petrol pump and the diesel, petrol and other mobile oil lying in the petrol pump. According to learned counsel for the appellants, these articles are not belonging to the appellants as the appellants are only dealer of said petroleum products. After going through the impugned order passed by the trial court, I do not find any illegality in the 2 same. There is no reason of staying the execution of the decree simply because of pendency of the appeal and in which no stay order is granted by the appellate court. The other objection is absolutely frivolous. In view of the above reasons, this appeal, having no merits, is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya