IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH AUGUST 2009 / 21ST SRAVANA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 918 of 2009(S) -------------------------------------------- (THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.8092/2009 DTD. 18/06/2009) .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- C.VIJAYAN, S/O. PADMANABHAN NAIR, AGE 50 YEARS, "SABARI" HOUSE, GURUVAYURAPPAN COLLEGE P.O. KOZHIKODE 673 014. BY ADV. MR.K.PRAVEEN KUMAR. RESPONDENT: --------------------- Z.R.ANSARI, (AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, MALABAR BOTANICAL GRADEN SOCIETY, GURUVAYOORAPPAN COLLEGE P.O. KOZHIKODE. BY ADVS. MR.V.G.ARUN, MR.T.R.HARIKUMAR. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/08/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. -------------------------------- Cont. Court Case (C) No.918 of 2009-S ---------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of August, 2009. J U D G M E N T The respondent has entered appearance through counsel and has also filed an affidavit wherein he has stated that the directions issued by this Court in Annexure I judgment have been complied with. He has also tendered unconditional apology for the endorsement made by him on the certified copy of the Annexure I judgment. He has also stated in affidavit that he was under the bonafide belief that the learned Government Pleader will appear for him also. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the respondent has also filed R.P.No.752 of 2009 seeking a review of Annexure A1 judgment. I have gone through the affidavit filed by the respondent. I have also heard the learned counsel appearing on either side. On going through the affidavit filed by the respondent and after hearing the submissions made at the Bar, I am of the opinion that on the facts disclosed, no further orders are called for in this Contempt of Court Case. It is accordingly closed. Sd/- ab P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE