IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.3088-M of 2010 Date of Decision:10.5.2010 Ajaib Singh and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. I.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. B.S. Sidhu, Advocate for respondent No.2-complainant. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.82 dated 7.4.2008 registered under Sections 406,498-A,120-B IPC at Police Station City Moga. Reply by way of affidavit of Balwinder Singh, DSP, City Moga, District Moga, has been filed in Crl. M. No.36100-M of 2009. The said Criminal miscellaneous is filed by co-accused of the petitioners. In para No.1 of the preliminary submissions of the said reply, it is stated that enquiry was conducted by Shri Gurdarshan Singh the then DSP Dharamkot wherein all the accused except Vardev Singh (husband of respondent No.2) were found innocent. Thus the challan has been filed only against accused Vardev Singh. In view of the reply filed by the State in the connected criminal miscellaneous as mentioned above, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition at this stage being infructuous. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage. 10.5.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE