IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 24th day of August, 2009 Bail Application No. 742 of 2009 Criminal Side Rajkumar S/o Bhullan R/o Village Sherpur, P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar …….Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…..Opposite Party. Arising out of Case Crime No. 186 of 2009, Under Sections: 394 & 411 I.P.C., P.S.: Kotwali Roorkee District: Haridwar. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard Mr. Manish Arora, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Brief Holder for the State, and Mr. Manav Sharma, learned counsel for the complainant. Applicant – Rajkumar, who is in jail in connection with Case Crime No. 186 of 2009, relating to offences punishable under Sections 394 & 411 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the crime due to enmity. It is further submitted that the complainant and all the accused are of the same Village Sherpur. It is further submitted that co-accused Shiv Kumar with similar role has already been directed to be enlarged on bail vide order dated 06.07.2009. Co-accused Bhullan Singh, father of the present applicant, has already been directed to be released on bail by Sessions Judge, Haridwar. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the complainant, without expressing any opinion as 2 to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail. Let the applicant- Rajkumar be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt.24.08.2009 NS