IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.905 of 2008 MITALI KUMARI, D/O-NILKANTH MANDAL, WIFE OF SRI BISHWANATH MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BALARPUR, P.S.& DISTRICT-BANKA, AT PRESENT AT BIJAY NAGAR, NEAR DURGA MANDIR ROAD, P.S.& DISTRICT-BANKA. VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESORUCES DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BANKA. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, BANKA. 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BANKA, DISTRICT-BANKA. 6. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, BANKA, DISTRICT-BANKA. 7. MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT DOMUHAN, BANKA, DISTRICT- BANKA. 8. PANCHAYAT SEVAK, GRAM PANCHAYAT DOMUHAN, BANKA, DISTRICT-BANKA. 9. KUMARI MENNAKSHI, WIFE OF RAVI SHANKER RAVI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-KARHARIA, NEAR DURGA ASTHAN, P.S.& DISTRICT- BANKA. ----------- 2/ 21.01.2010 Petitioner is aggrieved on account of appointment of respondent No. 9 as Panchayat Teacher against a post which fell vacant, on account of cancellation of appointment of one Rita Kumari. The District Panchayat Teachers Appointment Appellate Tribunal, had not been constituted when the petitioner had filed this application. Since August, 2008, the Tribunal is authorized to decide objections relating to appointment and other service conditions of Panchayat/Prakhand Teachers. Accordingly, this application is being disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner for filing an appeal, as provided under Rule 18 of 2008 Rules, before the District Panchayat Teachers Appointment Tribunal, Banka. In case the appeal preferred within one month from today, which should be considered and decided on merit within the statutory period. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)