6 ^ .^ M/w ^yy ..^ / IN THE HIGH COURT QF GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0 6?/3? /2010 PETITIONERS 1 Mujeeb Rahman S/o M.S Rahman^aged about 38 year R/o ChirminDist Koria (C.G). 2. ' Naushad Rahman S/o M.S Rahman aged about 47 year R/o ChirmiriDist Koria (C.G). 3.' Jagdish Kujur S/o Jagan Kujur. aged about 44 year R/o Ghirmiri Dist. Koria(C.G). .4. M.K Chaudhry S/o R>N Chaudhry^ aged about 40 year. R/o Chirimiri Dist. Koria (C.G). 5. U.K Vishwakarma S/o J.P Vishwakarma^aged about 42 year R/0 chirmiri Disf. Koria (C.G). 6. Vijay Kumar Shrivasfava S/o Shreenath Shrivastava ^ aged about 39 year R/o Chirmiri Dist. Koria (C.G). 7. Raj Kumar Mehta S/o Ramlal Mehta^aged eibout 41 year^ R/6 Chirmiri Dist. Koria (C.G). 8. Sanjeev Kumar S/o L.S Chandra. aged about 40 year R/o| Ghirmiri Dist. Koria (C.G) 9. Naveen Gupta S/o S.S. Gupta aged aboT-it 41 year, R/o Korba . Disf. Korba(C.G). 10. N.K Sahay S/6 S.D. Sahay aged about 40 year R/o Korba Dist. Korba(C.O). II .i^ IK' KJl- 11. ^C.D Bairagi S/ o R.D Bairagi, aged about 44 year. R/o Kusmunda Dist. Korba (C.G). 12. 13. 14. 15. Y 16. 17. 18. 19, Sanjay Chakraborty S/6 S.R Chakraborty^ aged aboyt 44 yeae. R/o Jamna /Kotma Dist. Sahdol (M.P). Asit Kumar Raha S/o A.N Raha, aged about 44 year R/o Jamna Kotma Dist. Sahaol (M.P). 1 Santosh Kumar Tainrakar S/o RsunmanQhar, aged^fabout SR/o Jamna Kofma Dist. Sahdol (M.P). Prakash Chandra Ramawat S/o R.N. Ramawat aged al)out 44 year R/o Jamna Kotraa ' Dist. Sahdol(M.P). . Sandeep Das S/o S.R. Das aged atioi-tt 44 yeai- R/o Jamna Kotraa Disfc Korba^M.P). 1 S. Bagchi S^o M.M BagcM aged about 45 year R/o Kusmund^ Dist. KprbafC.G). l J. Panickar S/o P.K.V Panikar aged about 47 year R/fQ KusmiM-tda; ©ist.Korba (C.O). ! P-KSingh S/Q C.S Ghandel agedi about 52 year R/o Kusmunaa| Di.st. Korba(G.G). Hanneet Singh ,S/o Lakhwant Sin^i aged about 42 year ^R/ 6 Kusmunda Dist. Korba (C.<^. •ll l' ^ll '^-^1^H^'':^'^^;.^;^ RESPONDENTS Union of India, Through the Secretary, Ministry ofCbal, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. < Coal India Litnited, Through the Chairman, Coal India Limited, 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kblkata 700 001 South . Eastem Coal Fields Limited, Through the CMD (Chairman-cuDa-Managing Du-ectdr) S.E.C.L. Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspiir (C.Gr.) The Directpr (Personnel) , South Eastem Coal Pield Ltd. Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) The Director (Personal & Industrial Relations) Coal India Lunited, 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata 700 001 WRIT PETmON UNDBR AIKHCLE 226 OF I'HE^ CONSTlTU'nONOKlNDIA ^ ri^ ii ^ i" 1!S Iti H' M i y sll sn^r vi r<i-fi4 '?Tti?T 3rTI^T'afEif^T 3^ef ^i<ii(rt<), ®Ti1^<i<o, f»<dl<-iy,< ...l<?;..Pi$)...H&....^.5.1^ sn^Tf '(I??T ('yl-l8!^) (wiw: ^ifta sn^i S.B:_HON'BL.E JUSTJCEJAR, PRnllNKER DIWAKER 18-11-2010; Shri Arv'ind Kumar Dubey, Smt. Smitha Ghai. counse jcounsel for the petitioners. ! for respondent No. 1. Advbc As Shri Praveen Das, South Eastern Coalfields Limited. to accept the notice on behatf of Counsel for the petitioner^ i.e. W.P. (S) No. 3657/2010, tl^ii 22.7.2010 and the present ofthesaid order. Counsel for the responde^its petition is aiso disposed of in th< passed by this Court.. Petifioners who are pres^r (Technical and Supervision) No. 3, have approached this of thei'r case for promotion in promotion contained in offlcj promulgated by the Coal India Submisslon of tearned accordlng to the policy, 40% of year in various discipline inciudi^ up by way of promotion on Ltti ^T^r4h '^^ ^ ts^ <f^^l< ^? SffifT 31I^?[ ate who normally appears for the l.is present in the Court, is directed fhe respondents No. 2 to 5. submits that in an idenfical matter jis Court has passed the order on petjtiijin can also be disposed of in terms onde^its have no objection if the present iht of the order dated 22.7.2010 Gr^de Cdurt ^nt!y working as Foreman incharge r^de-A in the service of respondent aggrieved by non-consideration with the exisfing poiicy pf memorandum dated 7/3/2007 ., the holding company. cjounse! for the petitioners is that post to be filled up in the financiai I'tig mining are required to be filled ita! basis from amon.ast the •' a-i- 113 Blll liillM nisia llllll lltllli im -HC—78 an^rwfnw wnsii^-anw D/- T^ r<1l'LII<'1A|, ®11iyi<o,[c(^|y^< 3TI^?TTra^' ('ipf^q^T) wirar ^ifta aii^r ^iiiffi'fl-t'v^ •? fs^ft <r>it<;i< ^afRiHsii^r eligi'bie officers holding feeder adhering to the policy and while 2007 the eligible candidates are according to the exlsting policyj highlighting grievance, a repr to respondents No. 2, 3 and petitioner remains unredressed. Taking into consideration appropriate to direct responde^ grievance of the petitioner. Acco) made in this regard to the promotion shalli be consideredj promotional scheme in accordaij not take any decision on p{ jrievances are not redressed, it| approach this Court or take available to them under the law. With the aforesaid observ^ ^osts but the respondents are not lirect recruitment is going on, since !not being considered for promotion of promotion. It is submitted Shat itation has been made on 11/10/09 but even then grievance of the he nature of grievance, it would be rts No. 2 and 3 to consider the •dingly, on a detailed representation indents No. 2 and 3, their claim for in accordance with the existing ice with law. If the respondents do ititioners' representation or their would be open for the petitioner to to such remedy as may be restourse tions, the petition is finaily disposed Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ^