.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1586 OF 2006 Kanti Jain ...Petitioner. Versus Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Petitioner in person present. Mr.G.Hariharan with Mr. R.C.Master Advoctes for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.Naphade, Sr.Counsel with Mr.J.Saluja i/b. M.V.Kini & Co. Advocates for Respondent No.3. Mr.S.B.Prabhavalkar, Advocate for Respondent No.4. .... CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : JULY 11, 2006. JULY 11, 2006. JULY 11, 2006. P.C.: . The dispute is, to whom was the draft payable, whether to a company or a proprietary concern. Both of them are not registered in the country. Apart from that there are several other disputed questions of fact. There being disputed questions of fact, it is not a fit case for this Court to exercise its extra ordinary jurisdiction. It would be open to the petitioner to take out appropriate civil proceedings to which he is entitled to in law. With the above observation, Petition stands disposed of. [F.I.REBELLO,J.] .[2]. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]