IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7821 of 2011 NAWAL KISHORE PRASAD, SON OF LATE JAGARNATH LAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE, P.O. AND P.S. DEEPNAGAR, DISTRICT NALANDA. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, VIDUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 2. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 3. THE FINANCIAL CONTROLLER, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDHUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 4. THE GENERAL MANAGER CUM CHIEF ENGINEER, DAROGA RAI PATH, CENTRAL AREA ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA. 5. THE SUPERINDENDING ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY CIRCLE, BIHARSHARIFF, NALANDA. 6. THE ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, BIHARSHARIFF, NALANDA. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 3.5.2011. Heard Shri Satya Ranjan Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ajay Kumar Gautam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the respondents/Bihar State Electricity Board. This is the second occasion for the petitioner to approach this Court with a plea to direct the respondents to clear all his retiral dues. Earlier a writ petition vide C.W.J.C. No.13091 of 2003 was filed by the petitioner, which was disposed of on 15.2.2007 granting liberty to the petitioner to raise his left over grievance, if any. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even till date, 2 remaining 10% of pension and gratuity amount have not been paid and petitioner is getting only 90% pension amount. The petitioner had also filed representation and raised his grievances before the authority concerned, but till date, no decision has been taken. The petitioner had retired as Junior Lineman, Electric Supply Sub Division No.2, Biharshariff, Nalanda with effect from 31.10.2002. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the fact that petitioner retired long back in the year 2002 and was having clean and satisfactory service record, he is still getting 90% of pension and entire gratuity amount has not been cleared. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that representation has also been filed before respondent no.2. In view of the facts and circumstances, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 i.e. Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board within a 3 period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.2 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.2 is directed to pass a speaking order within aforesaid time. With aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)