IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17529 of 2010 RITESH KUMAR @ AMOD KUMAR, SON OF LATE HARI PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 07.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The informant has stated that he received information that his sister had died because of a headache but when he reached there, he did not find his sister or the accused persons, and, therefore, alleged that in fact, his sister had been killed by the in-laws. The plea of the petitioner is that in fact, the deceased was suffering from epilepsy and had fallen down on account of it and had broken her head due to which she died. The brother of the deceased also supported the fact that the deceased had suffered from epilepsy. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in Hajipur Town (Industrial Area) P.s. Case No. 622 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The 2 bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)