IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18487 of 2004 Between: Kum. C.R. Swathi, D/o Sri C. Raghuramulu, R/o House No. 19-1-620, Outside Doodbowli, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Bahadurpura Mandal, Hyderabad. 2 The Joint Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. 3 Bhojireddy Engineering College, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad, rep. by its Secretary & Correspondent. 4 The Convenor, EAMCET-2004 (Admissions), Sankethika Vidyavihar, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not issuing the caste certificate on the petitioner's application dated 23-7-2004 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st respondent to issue Caste Certificate in favour of the petitioner herein, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.CH.RAVINDER Counsel for the Respondents: 1.GP FOR REVENUE (for R1 & R2) 2.Kum. C.Sindhu Kumari (for R3 & R4) The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.18487 of 2004 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus with the following substantial reliefs:- “declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not issuing the caste certificate on the petitioner’s application dated 23.7.2004 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st respondent to issue Caste Certificate in favour of the petitioner.” At the hearing, Sri Ch.Ravinder, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that in view of the subsequent events, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous. This order is without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedies, if any, available to/availed by her. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP Nos.24315 and 24316 of 2004 filed by the petitioner are disposed of as infructuous. _____________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 09.06.2008 v v To 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Bahadurpura Mandal, Hyderabad. 2 The Joint Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. 3 2CCs to 4 2CD copies