INTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASFUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION No. 3363 / Qp 2006 SSNOLt PETITIONER ^ ^w. .-^f •^y/ ^<^/ w/' 1- Ram Lal Khairwar, S/0. Shri Chain Singh Kharwar. age about 39 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary School Pali, Tahsil Pali, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 2- Smt. Savita-i Singh, aged about 40 years, W/0. Prem Singh, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary School Pali, Tahsil Pali, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 'v.. 'e': . •^ 'f^- '& f/ "''''' .f-'"w'~-<. '^' "^ // '' .^" . ' '"•-.. RESPONDENTS 3- Shri Suresh Kuraar Anchal, about 39 years. S/0. Latel Ram Anchal Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary School Pali, Tahsil Pali, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 4- Ramgopal Singh Ueke aged about 40 years, S/O.HiralalUeke, '•" Upper Division Teacher, Primary School (Purva Madhyamik) Chawda. Tahsil Pali, Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Commissioner, Department ofTribal Welfare, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Commissioner, Publication and Instructions, ^ RaipurfC.G.) XI-HC-22 sn^rqir Rpfesn^T Eifer aniwg TS? •^ww'if, arflwis, lsi<ni«y 3ii^i Ma«t» ^^^^^:W-9S^^ 200 3<l^:il6«11Wtri%tf 11.07.2006. Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, coi^ Mr. A.S. Kachhawaha, Got/t advance copy. Heard both the cwinsel. U^per The petitioners who are have preferred this writ petition India with e prayer that the re^ Allowance and House Rent Alfowance granted to the similarly situated pt Division Teachers working since 1993 i^nder Articte 226/227 of the Gonstitution of ^pondents be directed to allow Dearness to the petitioners as has been ersons. The case of the petitioner^ Upper Division Teachere by the year 1993 on probation for a periijid years period their services were 1 and House Rent Allowance are| probation period has also not tak^n Teachers who were appointed Administrative Tribunat by ftting same was decided on 31 .01,200tp regular pay scaie during the increments. The other teachers and they have also been given Vf to consider the representation petitionNo.1890/2003. r +l'i(?<-t'ifl-1 t<WdT^'te(A<fS|'KK ^ari^iran^T lisel forthe petitioners. t. Advocate for the State/respondente, on is that the petitionere were appointed as ^rstwhite State of Madhya Pradesh in the of two years and after completion of two Iregularized, but, the Deamess Allowance not being paid to them and twp years as a regutar period. The Upper Division pn the year 1993 approached the State fpriginal Application No.1452/1998 and the and the Government was directed to pay Iprobation period and other admissible 4iade the representation to the Deparbnent :)ie benefit. This Court also gave direction ^f the Upper Division Teachers. In writ (^y^r) \- */<v XI-HC-22 sn^T^iT R-ii+sn^r Shliqi uRfl ^r^'^- T^ '^W\<-\^, wS\ww, ^v^wy. Sll^l '451^1 *ii*<CTi sniicn •••••••••••••"•••••• gq- 200 f^re% an^rwgiwgfer -^- Leamed counset for the p treatment to the petitioner and <oi<i(ct<n-i ^iticirfftecii'<Rit<;i< ^isri^iTsn^T stitioners submte that the petitioners may be allowed to make a represer^ation to the respondents to gwe similar the same pay-scale which have been sanctioned to other similarly siti<ated teachers on account of tte order of the State Administrative Tribun^l vide order dated 31.01.2000 to which leamed Govt. Advocate for the St^te/respondents has no objection. Having heard learned cot^nsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of th^ case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the timited p|rayer laid by the teamed counsel for ttie petitioners appears to be justj petiBoners are allowed to make] No.2 annexing a copy of the in weeks from today and in tui representation of the petitioners fair and reasonable. Therefore, the a detailed representaUon to respondent stant wrlt petition within a period of two rn, respondent No.2 shatl decide the fithin a period of two months from the date of its receipt, in an objective man|ier, considering and examining the points raised by the petitioners, on its o^/n meritand pass appropriate order. With the direction aforesaicf, the writ petition stands disposed of. Parties are entitled for cert|fied copy of this orde>' Sd.)- L.C. Bhscioo Judge to^- (^y^-)