QiViSion Bsnch ®R1TPETiTiON (Ci N0. S02S2Q07 Coram : Hon'oie Shri -jagdish Bhaiia, Aciing GJ & Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. 4 s>iiiX. ^niromsHi ivistfiur. SQSCI sooLit 5'2 yssrs. w!f9 of Lsts S,R. Msthur. resident of Mill Ward, Main Road, Daili-Rajhara, Disnct Durg, through ths Power QT Attornsy @.nd her son Shri Alok Mathur, son of Late S.R. Mathur, aged about 39 years, rss'dspt of Mill Wsrd. ^isin Rosci Dalli-Raihara, District DufQ Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisaarh, throuah the Sscfstsrv. Mlnjstr^ of Pubilc Wor!® Depa'tr-ient, Mantraiava D.K.S.Bhawan. Raiour The Chief Engineer, Public Works DeDartment. Kanker Diy'sion. Kanker f^n^ ^''s/<»- ? The Executive Enaineer, Pubiic VVorR D©D2rrsTi6nt. KsnRsr Dlyislon. Kanker 'VVrit Petition under Anicie 22S of the Constitution of india Present: Shri B.P.Sharma, counsei for tne petitfoner. Shrl .A.S.Kachhay'.'aha, Government Advocate 'or the State. (Passed on 2Sm October, 2807} The following oral order of the Court »'as passed by Hon'bie Shri Jaadish Bhaiia, Actsng CJ. Learned counsei for the State submis that the imDugned oraer dated 11.07.2007 is not an order of black listing but only departmental communication. He further submits that there 'is some o'tepute and accordingiv t'ne petitioner would iike to approach the Aitiitrai Tribunat. AcoordiRgly, we have not examined the matter on merit. Therefore, it wiil be cpen fbr the petitioner to raise al! the matters before ths said Tribunal. As far as the registration is concemsd, the petitioner has atready moved an apptication for renewai of the reolstration. We do not see anv reason why the same shsii not be deoided by the responsibte authority, in accordance vi/lth iaw expeditiousiv. Sn the circumstances. no further interference is 'warranted in this petition. Acoordingly this petition is dismissed. Sd/- Acting ChiefJustice Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Syguns