IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22210 of 2010 RAM KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 467, 468, 420 and 504 of the I.P.C. It is alleged against the petitioner that he sold the Maruti Car to the complainant but has not delivered the original owner book and other papers of the vehicle in question. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the original paper has been misplaced and he is ready to get created the duplicate papers and will hand over to the complainant within a period of six months. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that delay in filing of anticipatory bail application is due to stay granted in quashing application. In view of the aforesaid 2 undertaking, let the petitioner, Ram Kumar Singh, be released on bail on his surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. (Distt. Gaya) No. 362 of 2005 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Sherghatti at Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. If the petitioner fails to deliver the duplicate paper of the vehicle in question to the complainant or does not return the consideration money within the aforesaid period of six months then the complainant will be at liberty to file cancellation of bail of the petitioner. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)