1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO.352 OF 2002 1. The Betul Sports Club, registered under Societies and its President Shri Remedios Simoes, r/o. Novowaddo, Betul, Quepem. 2. Shri Mercus Simoes, Secretary of the above Club, Novo-waddo, Betul, Quepem. 3. Shri Antonio Simoes, 4. Shri Manuel Simoes, 5. Shri Ivon Fernandes, 6. Shri Luciano Fernandes, 7. Shri Antonio Simoes, 8. Shri Conceicao Simoes 9. Shri Ranzil Simoes, 10. Shri Cruz Simoes, 11. Shri Julio Simoes all r/o Igrejawaddo,Betul, Quepem, Goa. 12. Shri Romeo Simoes, 13. Shri Seby Fernandes, 14. Shri Pedro Simoes, 15. Shri Jack Simoes, 16. Smt. Christalina Simoes, major of age, all r/o. 2 Tankewaddo, Betul,Quepem, Goa. ... Petitioners. Versus 1. Smt. Martina Simoes, aged about 65 years, widow, agriculturist and 2. Shri Lourenco Simoes, major of age, married, agriculturist and both r/o. H. No.90, Tankewaddo, Betul, Quepem, Goa. 3. Smt. Shamir Simoes, major of age, married, agriculturist and 4. Smt. Beena Simoes, major of age, widow, agriculturist, both r/o. H.No. 91, Tankewaddo, Betul, Quepem, goa. 5. Smt. Constantina Simoes, major of age, widow, agriculturist, r/o. H.No.89, Tankewaddo, Betul, Quepem, Goa. ... Respondents. Mr.N. Sardessai, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. J. E. Coelho Pereira, Senior Advocate with Mr. V. Korgaonkar, Advocate for the respondents. Coram :- S. A. BOBDE, J. Date : - 31th March, 2008. ORAL JUDGMENT : 3 1. Heard. There is no dispute that the suit itself is deemed for final decision and the Court has commenced the recording of evidence. In these circumstances, it is not necessary to decide this writ petition which challenges the order of injunction passed by the District Court. However, pending the decision of the suit though there shall be injunction restraining the petitioner's co-owners from parting with any rights in respect of the suit property to anybody including the Betul Sports Club, Quepem, the said co-owners shall be entitled to exercise such rights as they were exercising prior to the suit. In these circumstances of the case, the trial Court is directed to dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible. 2. The impugned order stands modified to the extent indicated above. Rule disposed of. S. A. BOBDE, J. SMA