Whether reporters of the Local Papers are allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA. Regular Second Appeal No. 371 of 2009. Decided on: July 21, 2010. Amin Chand. …… Appellant. Versus Roshan Lal. …….Respondent. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, J. Whether approved for reporting? For the appellant : Mr. S.D. Gill, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate. Surinder Singh, J (oral). The appellant is a plaintiff. He filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction, restraining the defendant from the suit land, on the ground that he is the owner in possession thereof alongwith others and the defendant has no right, title or interest in the suit land and so much so, he has nothing to do with the suit land, whereas, jamabandi Ex.P1 discloses that defendant was one of the co-sharer. The evidence further reveals that he had purchased one marla land from Durgi Devi in the suit land, which fact was suppressed by the appellant in the suit and the discretionary relief of injunction was declined, - 2 - precisely on the ground that he suppressed the material facts from the Court and that he did not approach the court with clean hands. 2. In appeal before the learned District Judge filed by him, the said findings were affirmed. On hearing the parties and going through the record, I do not find any illegality in the impugned judgments of the courts below, thus in my opinion, the discretionary relief was not wrongly granted to him. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed in liminie. CMP No.608 of 2009. Dismissed. (Surinder Singh ) Judge July 21, 2010. (Pds) - 3 -