IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.91 of 2011 Date of Decision : January 04, 2011. Michal .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.V.K.Sandhir, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is working as a Building Inspector in the Municipal Corporation, Amritsar. He has two fold grievances. Firstly, he states that no salary has been paid to him from 26.7.2010 onwards after his transfer from Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana to Municipal Corporation, Amritsar and secondly, arrears of his salary over and above the subsistence allowance for the period when he remained under suspension w.e.f. 30.8.2007 to 7.6.2009 has not been paid even when no charge-sheet was issued nor any enquiry was ever held. Both the above-stated claims have been raised by the petitioner vide his representation dated 22.10.2010 (Annexure P-10) but there is no response thereto so far. C.W.P.No .91 of 2011 2 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage with a direction to the Commissioners of the Municipal Corporations at Ludhiana and Amritsar, to consider the above-mentioned claim of the petitioner and release the due amount, within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. It is further directed that in the event of inter- se dispute between the two Corporations, the Municipal Corporation, Amritsar where the petitioner is presently posted, shall release the due arrears without prejudice to its right to seek re-imbursement of the same from the Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. January 04, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE