IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.38690 of 2010 1. ANTU DOM, 2. Vijay Dom, 3. Jhalaku Dom all sons of Bari Dom & 4. Sipahi Dom S/o Late Maharaj Dom Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 16.11.2010 Supplementary affidavit on behalf of the petitioners is being filed. Let it be kept with the record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 341, 504, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. Considering that the petitioners are in custody since 10.7.2010 and only simple injury was sustained by the injured that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, in connection with Nokha P.S. case no.84 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are - 2 - implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse,(iv) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (v) that the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)