CRLR No.49-06 Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. None is present for the revisionist even in the second revised call after lunch. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, is present for the respondent. The Court itself has perused the impugned judgment and order and has considered the merits of the case. The revision has been filed challenging the award of maintenance to the tune of Rs.1,500/- per month to the respondent from the date of application i.e.19.5.2003 u/s 125 Cr.P.C. against the revisionist. At the time of filing the revision, the maintenance amount was reduced to Rs.1,000/- per month. It was also made clear that if such amount is not paid by the revisionist then the stay order will come to an end automatically. However, nothing has been revealed by revisionist regarding the proof of payment to his wife. At the same time, he is also absent whereas the name of his counsel also appears in the list. Revisionist has been said to be a truck driver having ancestral land of about six acres besides the milk yielding buffaloes in his family. Thus, his income is quite sufficient to enable him to make this much of maintenance to his wife. The Court also do agree with the quantum of maintenance, as awarded by the trial court. There is no force in this revision which is liable to be dismissed. Revision is accordingly, dismissed. Inform the court below. The maintenance, as awarded by the trial court, is upheld since the date of moving application by the respondent. (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) 01.03.2013 Rdang