IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7443 of 1997 KUMARI LALMANI SAROJ daughter of Shree Ram Lakhan Prasad village at P. O. Khanstu via- Pariya, P. S. Tekari, District Gaya….. Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The District Magistrate, Gaya. 3. The Director, Primary Education, Patna. 4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Magadh Division, Gaya. 5. The District Superintendent of Education, Gaya. 6. The District Education Establishment Committee through its Secretary. 7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Paraiya, Gaya. …. Respondents. ----------- 4. 15.07.2010 Heard Counsel for the parties. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows : - "This is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ/direction for quashing the order contained in Memo no. 2094 dated 25.6.1997 passed by Respondent no. 5 whereby and where under the petitioner has been removed from the post of Assistant teacher in Primary School, Ubhai, Paraiya district-Gaya. The petitioner further prays for payment of arrear of salary and for also grant any consequential benefits for which he is found entitled at the time of having." The impugned order dated 25.6.1997 (Annexure-1) reads as follows:- 2 ^^dk;kZy; ftyk f'k{kk v/kh{kd] x;kA dk;kZy; vkns'k dqekjh ykyef.k ljkst] f'kf{kdk] izkkFkfed fo|ky; me;] ijS;k }kjk Ny iwoZd laLdqr e/;ek dh ;ksX;rk ds vk/kkj ij bl dk;kZy; ds Kkikad 8150 $ 8408 fnukad 25-6-87 }kjk fu;qfDr gkfly dh Fkha tkapksijkUr ;g ik;k x;k fd Jhefr ykyef.k ljkst mRizsf"kr laLd`r e/;ek ugha FkhA Jherh dqekjh ykyef.k ljkst }kjk ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; esa nk;j fjV ;kfpdk la[;k 10841@94 esa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 7-9-95 dks ikfjr vkns'k ds vkyksd esq Jherh ljkst dks LFkkiuk lfefr dh cSBd fnukad 18-10-95 esa fy, x;s fu.kZ; ds vkyksd esa mUgsa dk;Zof/k dk Hkqxrku bl dk;kZy; ds Kkikad 2688 fnukad 26-10-95 }kjk fd;k x;k rFkk mUgs fo|ky; esa mifLFkfr ugha cukus dk vkns'k fn;k x;kA ftyk f'k{kk LFkkiuk lfefr us viuh cSBd fnukad 8-6-97 esa Jherh dqekjh ykyef.k ljkst }kjk Ny iwoZd fu;qfDr gkfly djus dk dkj.k fnukad 26-10-95 ls lsok lekfIr dk fu.kZ; fy;k x;k gSA rnuqlkj fnukad 26-10-95 ls mudh lsok lekfIr dh tkrh gSA ,oa ml vof/k dk dksbZ Hkh Hkqxrku ugha gksxk D;ksafd bl dk;kZy; ds Kkikad 2688 fnukad 26-10-95 }kjk muls Li"Vhdj.k ekaxrs gq, vuqifLFkfr ugha cukus dks dgk x;k FkkA g0@& v'kksd dqekj ftyk f'k{kk v/kh{kd] x;kA** After some argument, Mr. Rajendra Prasad Singh, learned senior counsel for the petitioner realizing the fact that the issue raised in this writ petition involves the pure question of fact as to whether the petitioner had played a fraud in course of seeking appointment on the post of teacher by claiming to be a Madhyama Utprashit (sent up candidate), would seek permission to withdraw 3 this writ petition in order to file statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned order. That being so, this writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn with the aforementioned liberty. It is, however, made clear that the appellate authority shall not throw the appeal over board on the ground that the same is barred by limitation inasmuch as, he will have to keep in mind that the impugned order was passed on 25.6.1997 and the petitioner had already filed this writ petition on 20.8.97 i.e. well within the prescribed period of filing of the appeal. kanchan/ (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)