IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.54 of 2010 The Bihar State Board of Religious Trusts, Bidya Pati Marg, Patna- 800001 through Its Administrator cum Special Officer. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Department of Art, Culture and Youth Affairs, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Kishori Pandey, S/o Late Dev Nandan Pandey, R/o village- Baikathpur, P.S.-Khusroopur, District-Patna. 4. The Trust Committee of Radha Ballam Bhawani Shankar Gauri Baikunthnath Mahadev Mandir (Baikathpur Shiv Mandir), Village + P.O.- Baikathpur, P.S.-Kahusroopur, District-Patna through its Chairman. 5. The Chairman, Trust Committee of Radha Ballam Bhawani Shankar Gauri Baikunthnath Mahadev Mandir (Baikathpur Shiv Mandir), Village + P.O.- Baikathpur, P.S.-Kahusroopur, District-Patna 6. The Secretary, The Chairman, Trust Committee of Radha Ballam Bhawani Shankar Gauri Baikunthnath Mahadev Mandir (Baikathpur Shiv Mandir), Village + P.O.- Baikathpur, P.S.-Kahusroopur, District-Patna ----------- 6. 29-09-2010 Having heard Mr. Ambuj Narayan Chaubey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, The Bihar State Board of Religious Trust as also Mr. Pushkar Narain Shahi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner no. 3, opposite party, this court is of the considered view that there has been an apparent error in recording the statement of the parties in the order of this court dated 7.1.2010 in C.W.J.C. No. 17565 of 2009 wherein has been recorded that the Board has been dissolved and the administrator has been appointed. The fact remains that the term of the Board having been completed, Special Officer was appointed whereafter the Board had already been constituted. In that view of the matter, there is no requirement 2 of going to the consequence of supersession of the Board in as much as the Board still remains functional. Consequently, we would substitute the word „Board‟ in place of the „State Government‟ in the operative portion of the order containing the direction issued by this court in its order dated 07.01.2010 which would now read as follows: “In view of the aforesaid, we direct the competent authority of the Board to look into the grievance of the petitioner pertaining to management of the temple and take appropriate remedial measures so that such an ancient temple is protected and taken care of. We hope and trust that the Board shall not fail in its duty.” With the aforesaid modification in the order dated 07.01.2010 in C.W.J.C. No. 17565 of 2009, this review application is disposed of. Sujit (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J.)