IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44288 of 2008 TUNTUN MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 15.6.2009 KHAN Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under section 302/34 of the Penal Code and under section 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged by the informant that on the order of accused Dinesh Mahto, the petitioner Tuntun Mahto and co-accused Ravi Mahto fired upon his father as a result of which he fell down and succumbed to the injuries. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the injuries caused to the informant could not be fatal as he continued to run even after receiving the injury. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is rejected. (S.P.Singh,J)