IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.1432 of 2010 1. PAIRU PASWAN 2. BINESHWAR PASWAN, SONS OF LATE NARAYAN PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR **** /3/ 05.03.2010 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that the occurrence is of the year 2002 and the recovery was also in the same year, despite which the petitioners have surrendered only in August, 2009, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners for the present. 4. The prayer for bail is rejected. 5. However, they may renew their prayer for bail after framing of the charge. It is made clear that the petitioners’ case will not be signally committed to the Court of sessions just to expedite framing of charge. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)