IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.18752 of 2010 Date of Decision : October 14, 2010. Zaibby Mann and another .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Parminder Singh Sekhon, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners seek a mandamus to direct respondent Nos.1 to 5 to protect their life and liberty which is allegedly threatened by respondent No.6 & 7. From the documents on record, it is apparent that the petitioners belong to a well to do and influential family of Sangrur and are well educated persons fully aware of their rights. There is in fact a family dispute over several immovable properties which were owned by their grand-father and in relation to which, the real uncle of the petitioners, who is a Non-Resident-Indian, is claiming his share being legal heir. The petitioners, on the other hand, are relying upon a Will allegedly executed by their grand-father. It is apparent from the record that a civil suit in C.W.P.No .18752 of 2010 2 relation thereto is pending between the parties. In these circumstances, no direction, which might be pre-judicial to the interest of either of the parties, can be issued by this Court. The writ petition is dismissed, however, with liberty to the petitioners to pursue their representation(s), if any, before the higher authorities, in accordance with law. Dasti. October 14, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE