MRi R RFNCs" iSS^Ui-E.. BS-5's*'" IN THE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) WRITPETITIONfS)NO. 2-2 O /2QQ7 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22®~OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER .y° Af^ ^•"/•- \?:-;' ^l^w ...>:»>" s^y !y RESPONDENTS A -./••»> ^ "^^ .\3' ^ ' " ^\A .A^ V} ^ G>* <p ^- ^Harsit Sarkar (D.ED.) aged about 48 years, son of Shri Mahadeo Sarkar, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Tribal Primary School - Kerakona, Gram Panchayat Amlitikra, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, Distt.Raigarh (CG) VERSUS \^ State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipyr (C.G.) 2. _ Assistant Commissioner, Deptt of Tribal Welfare, Raigarh (C.G.) 3: Block Education officer, Vikas Khand Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) _^> XI-HC-78 r^) *IIHWI gi*frai 3'5T •<)|i|lcl<<, (STnyis, Rfcll^y _w >?^^-°^^_^Z. ^ .-^. :.\:.-.'........... -^ 200 311^1 4d* ('i?l^'!«<]ST) 3Ti^?r^iTR-ii+ traTsn^Tstiiiii < Bablu BTaTWHfttTSI^T 18.1.2007 AAr. Ajay Shrivastava an<^ petitioners. Mr. Satish 6upta, bepufy Sovemment Advocote for the respondenfs/State. With the consent of tearna are heanl finally and disposed of. Common order dictoted in V| passed separately. A copy of this order be pl writ petitions. ?;raifeTift;T WRffit te^ rf^resrc ^isri^R'an^T A.N. Bhakta, Advocates for the counsel for the porties, the matters tf. (s) No. 221 of 2007 in open Court, Aeed on the record of the connected Sd/-. Satish KAgnihotri Judge P.T.O. HI6H COlfiT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR SIN^.EBENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WKTT PETmON (S.) No. 221 OF 2007 Petitioner Responclents versus Jhafa Ram Kurre The State of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETTTEON (S.) No.222 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Punit Ram Bonjare The State of Chhatt'isgarh and another WRIT PETmON (5.) No.223 OF 2007 Petitioner Reqiondents versus Udho Ram bahare The State of Chha.tttsga.rh and another WRTT PETmON (S.) No. 228 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus l&uladipati Nayd< The State of Chhattisgcu-h and others WRTT PETTTION (S.) No. 229 OF 2007 Petitioner : Rajkumar Patel verais Respondents State of Chhatt-isgarh and cmother WRTT PFmTEON (S.) No. 230 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Harsit Sarkar The State of Chhatl-isgarh and another WRIT PETTTION (S.) No. 231 OT 2007 Petitioner ftesoondents versus Smt. Sangita Narang State of Chhatt'isgarh and others WRTT PETmON (5.) No. 232 OF 2007 Petitioner : Krishna Ram Patel versus Respondents S'tate of Chhat)-iS9arh and others WRFT pEm-tON (S.) No. 233 OF 2007 Petitioner : Soverdhan yadav versys Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PETITION (S.) No. 234 OF 2007 Petitjoner Verais Respondents ^ichael Tirkey @ AAikhile Tirkey State of Chhattisgarh and others And WRTT PETTTION (S.) No. 235 OF 20)7 Petitjoner ; Smt. Prabha Sharma Verais Rea»ondents Stnte of Chhattisgarh and another Present : Mr. Ajay Shrjvostava and Mr. A.N. Bhakta, Advocates for the petitioner-s. Mr. Satish 6upta, Deput/ Sovernment Advocate for the State/respondents. OROER (Passed on 1his 18th Day of January, 2007) Leamed counsel oppearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/re^iondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present batch of writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in 'the case of yas/Hmnf Kimw Bharadwetj vs. Mumclpal Corporation, Durg and anathei^ . 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (Seyiesfi KIHW Vetma vs. TVie Stats Swrt. af Chkattisywrfi and wmthei) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15-12- 2006, puraiant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, BcxH-d of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospec-tas of Diploma in Education Examiriation, it was clarified that the nomenclature of the Basic Trouning Institute, i.e., B.TJ. has been changed ond renamed as Diploma in Education, i^., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Sopedi Kwnai- Verma vs. Jhe State Sovt. of Chhattisgcs^i and eaiolhei) (Supra). 3. For the aforeinentioned reasons, the wrjt petitions are. disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matt-er of Yadiwwit Kumar WianidwaJ (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.TJ./D.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 apd further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of this order be placed on the record of -the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Bablu 1 20CteQI)A JR-C696