U , i t t J . ... ‘ gLGHHGQLJRT QF aJUDIQATgRE 9§HATT!5GARH : akASPUR Dim-$0M agNQH CORAM : HGN’BLE SHRI SR. NAYAK, QJ. HQNELE $HR! DR. QE$HMLAKH, LL ‘ ( WRIT PETITIQN NO. 121,0 OF 2005 PEEETigNgR Smt. Meenakshi Chandra, W” Wiage -— Jaijaipui‘, The“ - Jaijaipur, 5 Désti. Janjgir Champa (CG) Versus aEgnEQNgENTs 1. State {3f Chhattisgarh Through Coliector Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 2. Tah3iidar Korba Distt. Korba (C.G.) Pre$e§t : $hri H5. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Mg Sangeeta Mishra, ieamw amécus curiae for €he peiitiwes’. Shri V.V.S. Munhy, learned Dy. Advecate Gené‘rai f0? the 5::tate. (QRAL QRQERA (P‘asseti an 2W Feiii‘éiary, 2935) L K~ The fenewmg arder of the Cam was. pa$5ed by $.R. Nayaét, QJ. The petiticmer is the benefidary of an award passed by the Cemmissioner fer Weykmen Cempensationwaum-LabeLJ! Caurt, BHaspur dated 22—1V'2(3Q1. The getitime? in her gatter addmaed to the Ghief Jwtice. which has been tmateii a5 writ petitien. ha$ complained that ihe authorities under the Ghhattisggarh Revenua Reccvery Aci have mt taken appmpriate $teps ta .recovei' the mmpensatinn awarcied by the Caminieeioner for Workmen Campeneation. On the basis 0f the said Better. naticee were ieeued te the reeeendents herein. This caee hee undergene number ef edjeurnments in / erder te feeiiitete the respenderrts—eutheritiee te find. mi: ihe whereabouts of the em’pieyer ahd ateo to know whether he has any property situate within the gr 1 U territcria! jurisdintiw ef this Court !n the affidavits and the repdrts submitted to Ehe Cicurt, it i$ QQEnted out that the empbyer !efi: the: ChhattiSgarh Eitate evén befere the award Wm pa5$ed by the Cemmieeiener f0! Workmen Qemheneatieh and despite eifms made by the respondenteauthorities, hie whereaboute could net be knewn. The Qisti’ict Coilectcf in his tateet rehort dated 4~2—2006 hae etated that the empieyer hae not ieft any property in the Chhatti5garh $tete, We are eatistiec! that the reepondents—authoritiee have taken appmhtiete etepe te find eut the Whereebetsts cf the empieyer, bet in vain. There w he potnt'in keeping thie writ petition hending. in the eiteumetence, the writ petition is diepeeed ef. Ne eoste. 7 ' i Sd/- i y Chief Justice i Sdl- Dilip Raosaheb Demukh i Judge ite , , , , / J sh i L