DCRLR No.21/2007 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri R.S. Sammal, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Sanjeev Kumar Sah, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State. Delay Condonation Application There is delay of 308 days in filing the present revision. The delay has been explained by a sufficient cause in para no.7 of the affidavit of I.S. Rathore filed along with the delay condonation application. Delay is hereby condoned. Delay condonation application is allowed. Amendment Application No.539/08 This amendment application is moved on behalf of the revisionist with the prayer to set aside the order dated 27.11.2001 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Nainital in Misc. Criminal Case No.112/2001 u/s 125 Cr.P.C. may kindly be strike out and only order dated 31.05.2006 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court in Misc. Criminal Case No.66/04 u/s 127 Cr.P.C. is under challenge. He has submitted that in the present revision, he wants to challenge the order dated 31.5.2006 passed in Misc. Criminal Case No.66/04 u/s 127 Cr.P.C. only. Hence, the amendment sought by the revisionist is allowed. Let the amendment be incorporated within three days. I have perused the judgment and order dated 31.5.2006 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Nainital in Misc. Criminal Case No.66/04, Smt. Poonam Rathore Vs. I.S. Rathore. Admit the revision. Summon the trial court record. List thereafter for final hearing in due course. (D.V.,J.) 03.09.08 RG