EZ61. I^^ Ih^JK £0^. Z9fr mfa i^me js.h b^ue |jr^hyKs/<t>b^ii-ift' &><Ay abfek]K»/ctila^iie' iiS&"^ f-v--f'""^p 1^ (•ll.'fi) ^Sl^-ll^ '^h-l^ '[Plby(0> 11-1te K<P|'h "^UAti Iblte JM5 ^^llft Oli.Ofi (•li.'fi) ^&ll^-U^ 'Mlftlb l±^-U±ll6 'Mlnlb J±^- -e§' MtUJ^ ££. 'II^F' -S-3 -«» ^"j^ lUy ^IR> 11^'f^ U>(fclh.l^J TTOZr S^^ 'ON 'd'MiO ('li.'fl) ^^iKiy '°>l^^^(p<n hi*>ihii7" ba.F\ r?|^^i^+ IifiG—7S ^ST "4iAii<nAi, ^Til'M'i'o, feiray ..<2r.'AA^?.:....UA..:...s?.rZl^ sn^i '^95 ('^&^^ff) Sfl^I^I'feN? ^T!in STT^T ?h*ii<=ti ^inre'nfta sn^i I fi-11 -2011 Shri Abdui vv'ahab Khan, courtisei for the petitioner. Ms. aunita Jain, Panei Lawvel Tnougn Dy tnis petition, tne] <=tii*<l<vi4)i *<i^?if'^'fe(3t<r<n-^K ^sifgiran^r Shrivastava, J. for the State on aavance copy. petitioner nas prayed ror quasning of oraer dated 13/4/2010 as also order framina char.ges against the petltioner In criminat I" " ~ ' case and for quashing of the criminal proceedings, at this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner connnes his praye and a direction mav be issued to ext>edite the triai and conciude the same within a reasonable time. nis prayer ls not opposea oy tt has Deen submittea mat crtarges nave been framea on 13/4/10. till aate, not a singie prosecution witness n^s Deen examinea. Learnea couhsei for tne petitioner submits that the petitioneri that in any case, non-examination lyi vears has resuited in undue present is a Magisteria! trial. The averments made in thet againstthe petltioner on 13/4/2010. witness so rar, is ciearty inaicanv^ t)f prosecution witnesses, even after expiry of entitled to speedv trial. Present is Deen examinea. Non-exammation adverseiy affected petitioner's right ^fspeedytriai. by submitting thai the triai has been delayed iearned counsei for the State. is approaching his retirement. It is submitted aeiav in conciusion OT tne tnai wnereas tne petition show that the charges were framed However, non-examination of any prosecucon of unaue aeiay conciusion of triaf. 'he petitioner is facing trial after framinb of charge as back as on 13/4/10 and he is not a case that some of the witnesses have 0T not a singie witness DV me prosecution nas W-,. V 1 -HC—78 ~3^1 •<\ww^1,, ®Ti1y<is,fewy c^ ^ww yRVff^fj . »^o.SzS-/U •^ sn^i 'WK (i^ifg^if) sn^tw h-u'h '^^\ 3T1^?Tsh*iich •^ ,-• - u Deepii ^ ^FaiWHfetai^i 5- Accordingiv, this petition is fl trial Court shali make ail endeavor^ ' wiininan outer iimit.oT; Ssix-rBonms ! * '•- •i'J ^>iqf<vl<ilT 'RTq^ff ^ff^^ ^<^< ^siRnsn^i Inally disposed off observing that the learned to expedite the trial and conciude the same rrojm the date of receipt of copy of this order. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge r: -j -+- ^