Criminal Revision No. 693 of 1989 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. Criminal Revision No. 693 of 1989 Date of Decision: 29.01.2008. Iqbal Singh …Petitioner Versus Harbhajan Singh …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. M.S.Dhillon, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondent. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) On a complaint filed by the petitioner Iqbal Singh, respondent Harbhajan Sigh was summoned by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Kharar, for an offence under Section 167 IPC. This order was passed on 17.11.1988. Aggrieved against the same, respondent Harbhajan Singh filed a revision petition before the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Ropar. The said revision petition was accepted by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ropar, and it was held that prima facie no case is borne out from the record. It was further held that approach of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, in Criminal Revision No. 693 of 1989 2 summoning the accused in criminal charge, is not correct. The order of learned Additional Sessions Judge dated 17.11.1988 has been impugned in the present revision petition. In the same, notice was issued. A perusal of order of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Kharar, which was impugned before the Additional Sessions Judge, shows that it is alleged that the civil suit was decided as in the jamabandi respondent had omitted the name of complainant. Once suit has been decreed and the veracity of jamabandi was determined therein, therefore, no interference is called for. Thus, the present revision petition, being devoid of merits, is dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge January 29, 2008 “DK”