1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.951/2009 Suraj s/o Arvind Thakare ...Versus... State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. Rajura P.S. Tah. Rajura, Distt. Chandrapur -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri Firdos Mirza, Adv. for applicant] [Shri D.B. Patel, APP for non-applicant] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 19.03.2009 Heard learned Counsel for applicant and learned A.P.P. for non-applicant. I have perused the case diary produced before me by the learned A.P.P.. It appears that the applicant led mob of about 500 people of industrial unit and started agitating. To make an agitation may not be objectionable and the applicant may not be blamed for it. But then the mob under the leadership of the applicant started abusing police personnel in filthy language and not only that even they were assaulted. If the applicant had no ability to control his people, he 2 should not have led the mob. The point is ultimately the machinery which is supposed to maintain law and order itself has been attacked, which is not a good sign and for which I do not think benefit of anticipatory bail should be extended. In view of above, I make the following order. Criminal Application for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. Applicant may apply for regular bail and if such application is made the concerned Court shall forthwith decide the same. Criminal Application stands disposed of. JUDGE ssw