IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 22209 of 2003 Between: M.Upender Reddy, S/o late Seetaram Reddy, (Under suspension), Nagarjuna Grameena Bank, presently R/o at Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chairman, Nagarjuna Grameena Bank Head Office, Khammam. 2 S.Raghavachari, Inquiry Officer and Branch Manager, Nagarjuna Grameena Bank, Pochampally, Nalgonda District. 3 The Branch Manager, Nagarjuna Grameena Bank, Shaligowraram, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein not to proceed further in the departmental inquiry initiated against the petitioner herein vide charges in Head Office letter No.V&DP/269/212/2000 DT.15-4- 2000, V & DP/269/55/2002 DATED 18-2-2002 by declaring the action of the respondents in proceeding further in the departmental inquiry pending criminal case viz., Crime No.60/2002 on the file of S.H.O.,Police Station Shaligowraram as illegal and violative of principles of natural justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.VENKAT RAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.SRINIVASA MURTHY The Court made the following : ORDER : The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. ____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J MARCH 12, 2009 KSH