BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:21.06.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN Crl.OP(MD)No.7269 of 2011 M.Ayyammal :Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District. 2.Mr.Palanichamy, The Sub Inspector of Police, Austinpatti Police Station, Madurai District. 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID,Madurai District. :Respondents PRAYER:This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to transfer the investigation from the 2nd respondent to the 3rd respondent in connection with Crime No. 131 of 2011 on the file of the 2nd respondent. For Petitioner :Mr.R.Venkatesan For Respondents:Mr.P.Kannithevan,Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER This Petition has been filed to transfer the investigation from the 2nd respondent to the 3rd respondent in connection with Crime No. 131 of 2011 on the file of the 2nd respondent. 2.It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner is one of the accused in Crime No. 131 of 2011 and the case has been foisted on the petitioner and her unmarried daughter by the police after receiving huge amount from the de-facto complainant and the petitioner's family was also illegally detained and his daughter was also remanded to judicial custody and they apprehend that they may not get justice if the investigation is conducted by the second respondent. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that on the complaint given by one Pandi, a case was registered against Muniyandi, the petitioner and four others for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC, and the accused were arrested and the investigation is pending. 4.As the petitioner is one of the accused in Crime No. 131 of 2011, the respondent police have taken action and registered a case against the petitioner, the petitioner cannot have any grievance against the respondent police for having arrested his daughter as the petitioner's daughter was also arrayed as accused in the said case. If the petitioner has got any grievance against the de-facto complainant or against the second respondent, it is always open to him to give the complaint to the higher officials or to make a private complaint before the competent authority and on that ground, he cannot seek for transfer. 5.I do not find merits in this Petition. Hence, this Petition is dismissed.Consequently,connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (P&A) / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District. 2.Mr.Palanichamy, The Sub Inspector of Police, Austinpatti Police Station, Madurai District. 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Madurai District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor,Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,Madurai +1CC to Mr.R.Venkatesan, Advocate. SR.No.19737. RP/05.07.2011/1p/6c. Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 7269 of 2011,21.06.2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/