IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 978 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 978 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 978 OF 2006 Ramesh Vishnu Bhogale. ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Maharashtra & 2 ors. ] .. Respondents Ms. B.B. Dholakia i/b P.M. Patel for the petitioner. Mr. Milind More, AGP, for the respondents No.1 and 2. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 19TH APRIL, 2006 P.C. : . Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that though they have a Certificate for recovery, the same has not been executed by the respondents. The contention of the respondents is that it was not executed for want of proper address. Petitioners have now given the fresh address. Respondents are directed to execute the same at the fresh address within eight weeks from today. : 2 : 3. Rule made absolute accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]