IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 22910 of 2011 Date of decision December 9, 2011 Rupinder Kaur ....... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ........ Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Gursharan K Mann, Advocate for the petitioner. **** K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The petitioner shall have appropriate remedy under the provisions of the Cr.P.C. seeking for directions of investigation through the jurisdictional Magistrate. If the fourth respondent is guilty of any criminal offence the appropriate remedy cannot be by a writ petition. The protection which the petitioner seeks is quite needless at this stage, for, there is no basis for her own self inflicted apprehensions of visiting the fourth respondent and finding that fourth respondent is living with another woman when she must be concerned about her own personal safety. 2. The complaint which the petitioner has given to the Commissioner itself could be the basis for approaching the jurisdictional Magistrate for appropriate directions. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 9, 2011 archana