IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30846 of 2008 NAGINA MANJHI …. PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …. OPP. PARTY ----------- 3. 4.12.2008 Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri D. Mehta, APP for the State. The petitioner is not named in the FIR and is in custody for about one year and seven months in a case under Section 395 of the IPC. The petitioner has not been put on TIP nor anything has been recovered from his possession. The police did not put co-accused Sanjay Rajbanshi on TIP and that co-accused has been admitted to bail by Annexure – 2 by a bench of this court. The contention is that if the informant had identified the petitioner then it was expected that he ought to have named the petitioner in the FIR. Let petitioner Nagina Manjhi be released from custody on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. II, Gaya in connection with Sessions Trial No. 141 of 2007/ 737 of 2007 arising out of Atri P.S. Case No. 23 of 2007. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.) - 2 -