1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3981 OF 2010 Motilal Dhondu Lohar, Age 70 years, Occ. Business, R/o Main Road, Ramsing Nagar, Amoda Road, Shirpur, Tq. Shirpur, District Dhule ... PETITIONER VERSUS Omprakash Sitaram Agrawal, through general power of attorney Ganesh Sitaram Agrawal, Age 55 years, Occ. Business & Agri., R/o Shirpur, Tq. Shirpur, District Dhule ... RESPONDENT ..... Shri S.P. Brahme, Advocate for the petitioner ..... CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 29th September, 2010. ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. Heard. Rule was issued on 2.8.2010. Ad-interim relief was granted in favour of the petitioner by order dated 7.6.2010. The short controversy that revolves is, in a suit, the defendant (petitioner) desired to examine the attesting witness to the sale deed and the learned Judge has refused the same. It was informed to the learned Judge by the plaintiff that defendant 2 (petitioner) was protracting the matter on several pretexts. It is also informed by the plaintiff that in the affidavit, defendant did not disclose of any such attesting witness or his examination nor he has furnished list of witnesses to be examined. The Court had granted last chance to the defendant to lead evidence. In spite of this, application was moved. The rejection by order dated 30.3.2010, by the learned Judge, does not call for interference as it is in tune with the record and also defeat the protraction practice adopted by the defendant. Writ Petition dismissed. Rule discharged. Ad-interim relief is vacated. No costs. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE