THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA Civil Revision Petition No.3851 of 2009 Date: 06-11-2009 Between 1. Oleti Bharathi and another … Respondents/Plaintiffs/ Petitioners and K.Santhakumari … Petitioner/Defendant No.2 Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA Civil Revision Petition No.3851 of 2009 Oral Order: Heard Sri V.V.L.N.Sarma, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners. 2. This civil revision petition is directed against the order, dated 15-7-2009, passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Avanigadda, Krishna district in allowing the application I.A.No.587 of 2009 in O.S.No.128 of 2004, filed under Order VII, Rule 14 (3) and Section 151 of C.P.C., and permitting the petitioner therein to mark the documents subject to proof and relevancy. 3. The petitioners herein are the plaintiffs and the respondent is defendant No.2 in the suit before the trial Court. 4. It appears, certain documents were sought to be marked by defendant No.2 and the said documents, according to the plaintiffs, are inadmissible, inasmuch as they are notarized but not originals. 5. It is the contention of the learned Counsel for the plaintiffs that despite the objection, the trial Court permitted defendant No.2 to bring those documents on record. 6. This Court cannot express any view at this stage, particularly exercising the revisional jurisdiction. 7. On the other hand, the plaintiffs can always take this objection during the trial of the suit and the trial Court, after framing appropriate additional issue in this regard, if felt necessary, can decide the matter. 8. In view of the matter, I do not find any merit at present in the revision. 9. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission, confirming the impugned order. ___________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 06th November, 2009. Ak