1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4674 OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra and another ...Petitioners Versus Motilal Kacharulal Lohiya and another ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4680 OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra and another ...Petitioners Versus Maheboobkhan Dulekhan Pathan and another ...Respondents ..... Mr. M.L. Dharashive, AGP for petitioners. Mr. P.N. Kalani, advocate for respondents ..... CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 17TH AUGUST, 2009 PER COURT:- 1 These two writ petitions are filed by the State of Maharashtra challenging the order dated 14.3.2008 passed in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 35 of 2007 and the order dated 6.3.2008 passed in Misc. Civil appeal No. 34 of 2007 by the District Judge, Parbhani. 2 It is not in dispute that Misc. Civil Appeal No. 35 of 2007 arising out of R.C.S. No.51 of 2007 and Misc. Civil appeal No. 34 of 2007 arising out of 2 R.C.S. No. 48 of 2007. In both the mattes, the respondent approached the lower appellate Court for interim relief and upon hearing the parties, the lower appellate court granted interim relief in favour of the respondents. The petitioners herein, State authorities were directed to remove the seal of saw Mill pending disposal of the R.C.S. No. 51 of 2007. Similarly in another civil appeal, same relief was granted in favour of the respondent therein. By way of direction No.3, the trial court was directed to dispose of pending suits i.e. R.C.S. No. 48 of 2007 and R.C.S. No. 51 of 2007 within two months from the date of order. 3 Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has tendered a copy of judgments and decree dated 9.4.2009 passed in R.C.S. No. 48 of 2007 and 51 of 2007. The certified copies of judgment and decree are taken on record and marked “X” (Collectively) for identification. Since the suits, which were pending before the trial court are themselves dismissed finally, the interim relief granted by the lower appellate court do not survive thereafter in view of the dismissal of the suits bearing R.C.S. No. 48 of 2007 and 51 of 2007 and thus, the present petitions have become infructuous and the same are disposed of as infructuous. 4. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. *****