-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1610 OF 2011 M/s. Siddhivinayak Grain Dealers Association. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. ..Respondents. Mr. H. G. Wakshe i/b S. S. Suryavanshi for the petitioner. Mr. C. R. Sonawane, AGP for the State. Coram : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & RANJIT V. MORE, JJ. Date : February 22, 2011. P. C. : 1. Matter is not on board. Taken on board by consent of the parties. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the respective parties. The grievance of the petitioner is that his dealer’s licence is suspended by the 2nd respondent. Admittedly, the revision filed by the petitioner is pending before the 3rd respondent. In the circumstances, in our opinion, the only appropriate order that can be passed is to direct the 3rd respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s revision application as expeditiously as possible independently and in accordance with law. Mr. Sonawane has no objection if such an order is passed. Hence following order. srp -: 2 :- -: O R D E R :- (i) The 3rd respondent is directed to hear and dispose of the petitioner’s revision application, a copy of which is annexed to the petition at Exhibit-D, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within the period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (ii)Result may be communicated to the petitioner. (iii)It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. (iv)Writ petition stands disposed of. (Ranjit V. More, J.) (Smt. Ranjana Desai,J.)