HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.763 of 2010 Dated: 05-03-2010 Between: Sriram Chandran Kumar. … Petitioner And Thota Pullaiah. … Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.763 of 2010 ORDER: In this civil revision petition, the petitioner-plaintiff has challenged the validity of the order, dated 23rd November 2009, passed by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Mahabubabad, in I.A.No.300 of 2009 in O.S.No.78 of 2009, rejecting the application of the petitioner for appointment of Advocate-Commissioner to inspect the suit schedule property with reference to the given boundaries, and to note down the existing physical features/constructions made therein and to file his report. 2. The suit is filed for injunction simplicitor. It is for the petitioner-plaintiff to prove his possession as per the boundaries mentioned in the suit schedule property. But, on the ground that some constructions are being made over the property, he cannot seek for appointment of Advocate-Commissioner, at this stage. In view of the valid reasons recorded by the Court below while rejecting the application, I do not find any merit in this revision petition, warranting interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. For the aforesaid reasons, the revision is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 5th March 2010 ajr