-#- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1290 OF 2006 Shri. Mevalal Horilal Gupta ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Mah. and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Harshal N. Mirashi for Petitioner. Ms. Geeta Shastri, A.G.P. for R. No. 1. Mrs. S. Ajitkumar for R. No. 2. Ms. Anjali Chandurkar i/by Purnanand & Co. for R.Nos. 4 and 5. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA JJ ANOOP V. MOHTA JJ ANOOP V. MOHTA JJ. DATE : 4th May, 2006 DATE : 4th May, 2006 DATE : 4th May, 2006 P.C.: . The Petitioner has filed a suit for declaration of his rights. The respondent have filed a suit for his eviction. Apart from that on behalf of the respondents, the learned counsel makes a statement that the premises in occupation of the Petitioner are not required to be demolished in the first phase of the construction and what is being developed is the first phase. Considering that, this is not a fit case for this court to exercise its extra ordinary jurisdiction. Petition rejected. (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)