IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3209 of 2009 DURGA NAND SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 17.3.2009 Surendra/ Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. In view of the statutory alternative remedy available to the petitioner this writ application as with regard to cancellation of his appointment is presently not maintainable. It is true that in terms of the report of the Block Development Officer certain orders have been issued by the Collector and the District Superintendent of Education but then the service of the petitioner had yet to be terminated. As and when the service of the petitioner would be terminated the petitioner will have the remedy to approach the District Appellate Tribunal which is now the competent statutory body to look into the grievance of the teachers of Panchayat/ Prakhand level. That being so, this application is wholly misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)