/2- c^ IN THB HIGH COURt OF CHHAmSGARH AT BHASPUK WK[TPE3T[T!ON(SUfc^l^^ /20tl PETITIONER /^^-:- ^.g^l^ '^y' '^" , , ",!• RESPQNDENTS Madhav Singh Kushwaha, S/o., Shri B.L. SingK Kushn'aha, ^ggS about 54 years, presetitly worlang as S.D.O. P.W.D. sub divisioii, Chui Khadan, Distt. 'RajnandgaOn . (C.G.) . , , • • :'":;, VERSUS ' 1^'State of ChhattisgarM, through its \ •' • ' ' ''•:•:• •.:• •'."' Secretary, Publie 'WorKS Department, D.K.S. Bhawstti, Raipur(C.G.) / ': ; : •: . •..;'/^^ 2. E^ngineer in Chief, Public Wffrk& Departinent, Sirpur Bhawaff, Raipur(C.G.) WMTPBTITIONUNMSjlRTKa^ 226/2:270F THE CONSTlTOnON OF INOIA IN HIGH COURT OF CMHAmSGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.1967 OF 2011 PETITIONER MadhavSinghKushwaha Versus 6-r RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh &An6ther <si-% Gowri (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) SingleBench:Hoh'bleShriSatiShK.Agnihotri,J. Present:- Shri P.S. Koshy.Advocate for thepetitioner, ShriA.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER(ORALy (Passed oh this 11th dayofApril, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, oh instruGtions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation before the appropriate authority, if so advised. 2. Learned PgneF Lawyer appearing fpr the State Opposes the aforesaid prayer. 3. However, inthefactsoftheCasethepetitionerispermittedtomake a representation before the appropriate authority. If the represenfationis made, the same may be considered and decided in accordance with law and on its own ments, as expeditiously as possible. 4. Accordingly,thewritpetitionjsdisposed6f. Sd/- SatishK.Agroh0 Judge