IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.541 of 2011 RABINDRA PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 04.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 420/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged against the petitioner that he used to share the money from the beneficiaries of “Indira Awas Yojna”. During investigation, it appears that some witnesses have supported the prosecution case but the beneficiaries have denied the accusation. The new trend has developed that in the Indira Awas Yojna’s money, the persons who are authorized to sanction and disburse the money, they are not held responsible but some irrelevant persons naming them to be middlemen are being involved to save the skin of responsible persons. Let the Superintendent of Police, Nalanda, fix the accusation in the case with regard to actual officers and panchayat 2 representatives who sanctioned and disbursed the money. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Ekanagar Sarai P.S. Case No. 71 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A. C. J. M. Hilsa, (Nalanda) subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is submitted by Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned counsel for the State that investigation is going on and it is expected that the petitioner will co-operate during investigation. Petitioner’s non co-operation will give liberty to the informant to file an appropriate application before this Court. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)