HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLESHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. Appellants Claimants .:-^y Respondents Non-applicants Respondents Non-applicants MiscADDeal (C) No.92 of2007 1 Gand Dhar Sagar, Age - 50 years, S/o Late Shri Maan Singh 2 Smt Jamila Bai, Age — 45 years, W/o Gand Dhar Sagar Both are r/o Village Laripur, PS Basna, Tahsil - Distt Mahasamund (CG) VERSUS ^ 1. Ghasiram Chowhan, Age notknown, S/o not known, by profession Driver, R/o Mahal Para, Saraipali, PS Saraipali, Distt Mahasamund (CG) (Driver of the Mini Bus No.CG 06- A/8286) 2. Jaswant Singh Saluja, Age 44 years, S/o Indersingh Saluja, R/o Village - Basna, PS Basna, Distt Mahasamund (CG) (Owner of the Mini Bus No.CG 06- A/8236) 3. The New India Insurance Com Ltd., Divisional Office at Madina Building, Jail Road, Raipru Distt Raipur (CG) (Ins Com of the Mini Bus No.CG 06- A/8286) 4 Bazir Singh, Age 28 years, S/o Mohan Singh Chowdhary, By profession Driver, Through MS Transport Corp of India, Tatiband, Raipur Distt Raipur (CG) Other address: Bazir Singh, S/o Mohan Singh, By profession — Driver, Through M.S. Transport Corp of India, 17/6 Mathura Road, Faridabad (Haryana) ^ 1 1 5 .!/ /^ (Driver of the Truck - Traller No.HR 51/GA/1437) 5 M.S.Transport Corp India Ltd., Tatiband, Raipur, Distt Raipur Other address M.S. Transport Corp of India, 17/6 Mathura Road Faridabad (Haryana) (Owner of the Truck - Traller No.HR 51/GA/1437) 6 The Oriental Insurance com. Ltd., Divisional Office at Madina Building, Jail Road, Raipur Distt Raipur (CG)* (Insurer of the Truck - Traller No.HR 51/GA/1437) MISC. APPEAL UNDERSECTION 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLESACT. Present: None for the appellants. Shri Anand Gupta, counsel for respondent No.3. Shri Mukesh Sharma, counsel for respondents No.4 and 5. Shri P Dutta, counsel for respondent No.6. ORDER (10th March,2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellants. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want ofprosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecutjon. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge padma