IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 7782/2008 Decided on:30.11.2010 _____________________________________________ Rama Nand. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. V.D. Khidta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner was conferred with work charge status on 11.7.1977. He was made work charge converted under the regular establishment with effect from 2.12.1981. Case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he has not been considered for the post of Clerk against 10% quota. It has come in the reply that 10% quota is only prescribed for regularly appointed Class-IV employees like Peon etc. etc. Since the petitioner has not been converted into regular establishment, 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 his category does not fall in the feeder category to the post of Clerk. However, in case the petitioner has been regularized, his case shall be considered for promotion to the post of Clerk against 10% quota within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. In view of above observations/discussion, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 30.11.2010 *awasthi*