”7 ND(§\YL(\ ‘ u C mand Gupta ad Rameshar ras Gupt abut 3 years, s/o. o 6 a, R/o‘ Vilge Prsa, Polic Stion— Ambikapur, Distt, Srgua hattisgarh. ’ ” te of Chhattisgar hrough ; (Comercial an Tax partmen The Insctor Genel la a e at uj Ch / VERSIm Principal Sretary, Raipur. Chhtisgarh aipur, Registration) M.P‘, Now 3 e District Reg 2) att, R ( (C istrar (Rgistration Dirict Sga G) e) st uruj The olect, District (Chhattisgar ajh um Gupta cumen er (Sittig at Reistrati Office Ambikaur) Distt. SuujChhatsgar) ITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTIN OFVINDIAT 4) Surguj, Ambikaur a p aged about 1 ears, , /o, /o. ri Rameshwar Mayapur Prasad uation Gupta, — 3 y s r Sh , Occp “cg , , ._.._g,w* / 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH mT PETITION No, I l Q g /2002 PETITIONER Raan ge w Pad RESPONDENTs “y Sta h, T m d Det), pe ra ec ) Th Clor h) 5) Res Kar Dot Writ n gon , p rgaKtih f ix WRIT PET @ HIGH COURT m: CHHaQTXi§GARH AT EBgASPuR WRET PE“§“§"§“§@N Ml 11$Q§F 2mm §>emioner Ramanand Gupta Vemus Resgondenig WRET PETVHON UNDER ARTICLE 226i227 OF THE C$N$"¥"i"§'UTION OF iNDlA i$$ : Homhm ML $a‘iish K, Agnihoiri, J.) Presen‘: :« Shri Shantanu Kumar, Adycsate farthe petmcmer. Shri Sha3hank Thakur, Panei Lawyer for the Stats. State 0f Chhaftisgarh & Qthers QR§§R {(3RAL! {inassed 0n 15‘” day 3f sepmmber; 204. 0,) Leamed counsei appearmg for ihe petmnner, submits that Wifh the passage 3f time: the pefhéion has became inf’ructuous. Learned caunse! appearing for oiher side dbes mt controverf the abeve submi$sion m view of the above, the writ petitian is dism§ssed, a$ having became . mfruciuoua i Sd/-« i ‘ Sau'sh K. Agnihotrif Judge i N \ r