IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 21ST OCTOBER 2010 / 29TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 32249 of 2010(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- FRANCIS BERNARD,AGED 62 YEARS, S/O.JULIAN BERNARD,RESIDING AT PARADE ROAD, 1/297,COCHIN CORPORATION,MANAGING DIRECTOR, BERNARD FARMS POWER PVT.LTD,UPPARAPUL, CHATHURANGA.P.O,IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.ANTONY KUREETHARA SRI.C.AJITH KUMAR (KALLESSERIL) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. M.L.LEGESH,AGED 24 YEARS,S/O.LAMBODARAN, MUNDAKKAL HOUSE,BISON VALLEY VILLAGE, POTHENKADU KARA,UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK-685584. 2. M.L.LENESH,S/O.LAMBODARAN ,MUNDAKKAL HOUSE,BISON VALLEY VILLAGE,POTHENKADU KARA, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK-685554. 3. SAROJINI,MUNDAKKAL HOUSE,BISON VALLEY VILLAGE,POTHENKADU KARA,UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK-685554. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SANTHANPARA-685619. 5. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SANTHANPARA-685619. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 32249 of 2010 E ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 21st day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Inaction of the fourth respondent on Ext.P6 complaint made by the petitioner led the petitioner to file this writ petition. 2. In Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [2008 (2) SCC 409], the Apex Court has already held that in such a situation, the remedy of the aggrieved is to move the jurisdictional Magistrate and that a writ petition is not the appropriate remedy. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to seek his remedy before the appropriate Magistrate Court. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks