IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR NO.4929 OF 2009 DECIDED ON : 31.08.2009 Avtar Singh ...Petitioner versus Rajesh & others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Hari Om Attri, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This revision petition has been filed against the order dated 22.11.2008 of the Courts below declining the plea of the petitioner for permanent injunction with regard to 7 kanals 18 marlas of land comprised in Khasra No.548/1/2 (5-7), 2/2/1 (2-11), 2/2/2 (0-7), 549/2/2 (3-12), 3/2 (5-7), 4/2 (5-7), 5/2 (5-7), Khewat No.2436/4981 Khatoni No.3202 on the allegation that he was an old tenant on the land in dispute under the previous owner. Learned counsel has placed specific reliance on some agreement dated 17.09.2008 (which is not placed on record) and copy of Nehri Girdawari for the period 2008-09 Annexure P-3 & P-4. Apart from other infirmities in the case of the petitioner, I find from a perusal of Annexures P-3 & P-4, that the land mentioned in them is different from the land in dispute. In these circumstances, I am constrained to hold that the petitioner has sought to over-reach this Court. Apart from this both the Courts below have rightly CR No.4929 of 2009 -2- come to the conclusion that there is nothing on record to show that the petitioner is an old tenant on the land in dispute. Neither is there any lease deed nor is there any evidence of any payment of lease amount. Even the solitary jamabandi as well as latest khasra girdawari placed on record name the owner in the column of cultivation. Consequently, this revision petition is dismissed with the costs of Rs.10,000/- to be deposited in Lawyers Welfare Fund. It is further directed that the suit shall not proceed further till the receipt of payment of costs is shown to the Trial Court. August 31, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE