WP(C) 334/2008 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. A. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. R. Chakraborty, learned State Counsel for the respondents. The petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to finalise the tender process initiated vide NIT dated 17.4.2007 for settlement of Balisat ra bi weekly market. It appears that a writ petition being WP(C) No. 2363/2007 w as filed making a challenge to the tender process. The writ petition has been wi thdrawn as per the order dated 7.1.2008. Prior to that the tender notice was sta yed vide order dated 21.5.2007. In view of the above, it is the case of the petitioner that since there is no impediment towards settlement of the market, the authority should finalize the process towards settlement of the market in accordance with law. Having regard to the limited grievance raised and as agreed to by the le arned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of providing that t he respondents more particularly the respondents No. 3 and 4 may take a decision in the matter in accordance with law. Writ petition is disposed of.