IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.1900 of 2009 ( O & M) Date of decision:- 28.07.2009. Banwari Lal ...Petitioner. Versus Haryana State ...Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present:- Mr. Divay Sarup, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N.JINDAL J. Counsel for the petitioner has urged that due to inadvertance he could not bring it to the notice of the Executing Court that he was also entitled to interest. This objection could be raised before the Additional District Judge, Hisar to passed the order calculations were submitted by the petitioner. As such, this petition is dismissed with the liberty to the petitioner to have recourse to the remedy as provided under law. July 28, 2009 (A.N.JINDAL) vj JUDGE