IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 24TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 37063 of 2007(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ K.S.SUDEVAN PILLAI, AGED 40, S/O.N.SREEDHARAN PILLAI, PULAKKAD HOUSE, PONNADU P.O., MANNANCHERRY, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR SMT.BHAVANA VELAYUDHAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. KAVUNKAL KSHEEROLPADAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO. A181 (E), A.P.W.S., KAVUNKAL, MANNANCHERRY, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.ANU SIVARAM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W.P.(C) No. 37063 of 2007-K ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 13th day of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner states that a revision filed by him before the Kerala State Co-operative Tribunal is not being entertained by the office of the Tribunal, on the allegation that the revision is barred by limitation. The question whether a proceeding is barred by limitation is a matter for judicial consideration and the office of the Tribunal cannot preclude the opportunity for the party to deliver reasons before the Tribunal, as to why, in his plea, the proceedings are not barred by limitation. Hence, this writ petition is disposed of directing that the revision petition of the petitioner shall be placed for consideration of the Tribunal and the Tribunal shall pass an order, after hearing the petitioner. The Tribunal will consider such question, at the earliest, on filing of the revision. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge ms