:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO.791 OF 2007 NO.791 OF 2007 NO.791 OF 2007 IN IN IN SUMMONS SUMMONS SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.58 OF 2007 FOR JUDGMENT NO.58 OF 2007 FOR JUDGMENT NO.58 OF 2007 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO.2999 OF 2006 SUIT NO.2999 OF 2006 SUIT NO.2999 OF 2006 Atma Prasad Pandey ..Appellant Vs. Mr.Kedar Pandey & Ors. ..Respondents None for the Appellant. Mr.M.G.Barve for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2008 : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2008 : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . None appears for the Appellant. In any event, no Letters Patent Appeal lies against the order granting un-conditional leave to defend in a Summary Suit. Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)