IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3902 of 2004 HARENDRA PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.13492 of 2003 SRI PRASAD THAKUR & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.9138 of 2004 NAGENDRA KUMAR RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6 19.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Contention of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners is that despite observation of the Division Bench contained in annexure-13 the respondents are taking steps to fill up the regular posts but without giving preference or relaxation in age. Appointments have not been made till date. As per the submission of learned counsel some kind of exercise is going on. In that view of the matter the stage for petitioners to approach this High Court will come when the final decision is taken. This Court can not pass any direction at this stage only on the expected kind of exercise. The Division Bench observation is there and the petitioners have freedom to approach the competent authority before the process of appointment begins. This writ application stands disposed of with the above observation. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)