MC 2313/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY in WP(C) No.6457 of 2005 Heard Mr.D.P.Borah, learned counsel for the applicant-writ petitioner and Mr. M .Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department, Assam. The applicant is the widow of the writ petitioner No.1 in the ac companying Writ Petition (C ) No.6457/2005. Her husband had approached this Cour t with the said writ petition being aggrieved by the contemplated recovery of so me amount from his salary/entitlement on the ground of excess payment made to hi m earlier. The applicant has stated that her husband expired leaving behind him her wife(applicant) and two daughters. Mr. Borah, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted on in structions that their daughters are minors and are represented by the their moth er and natural guardian. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on a consid eration of the averments made in the application as well as the relief sought f or, this Court is of the considered view that the prayer for substitution ought to be allowed. Ordered accordingly. The applicant would stand substituted in place of the original writ petitioner No.1 in the accompanying Writ Petition (C) No.6457/2005. Office would make necessary corrections in the cause title Misc case is allowed in the above terms.