THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 683 of 2010. Mahendra Kumar S/O Late Pyare Lal … Petitioner. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others. …Respondents. Mr. Gopal Narain, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.C.Tiwari, Brief Holder, learned counsel for the respondents. Date August 16, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. On 11-8-2010, direction was given to the State counsel to seek instruction as to why the petitioner was not permitted to work as Accountant, while he had already joined his duty on 7-7-2010, which has been inadvertently transcribed as 07-07-2008. Let the order dated 11-8-2010 be corrected accordingly. Learned Brief Holder for the respondents states that instructions have been received from the Transport Commissioner. It has been informed that there are two separate post-one of accountant and the other of assistant accountant. On the post of accountant, the petitioner is working. A copy of the instructions has been produced before the Court. Let it be placed on record. A copy of the same has also been supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner. The Transport Commissioner has mentioned that the petitioner has not been stopped from working as accountant. He has not been relieved from his duties. It is also mentioned that no cause of action has arisen to the petitioner. In view of the instructions received from the Transport Commissioner, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP