IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.101 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.101 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.101 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2694 OF 1999 M/S. AKRUTI NIRMAN PVT.LTD.&ORS. ...PETITIONERS. VS. BRIHANMUMBAI MAHANAGARPALIKA & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS. MR. E.P.BHARUCHA WITH USHA R. GADAGKAR I/B. KHONA & KAYSER FOR THE PETITIONERS. MR. A.Y.SAKHARE WITH A.Y. SAKHARE WITH A.R.JOSHI FOR THE RESPONDENTS. Coram : S.K.Shah, J. Coram : S.K.Shah, J. Coram : S.K.Shah, J. Date : February 10, 2006. Date : February 10, 2006. Date : February 10, 2006. P.C. 1. The learned Counsel for the Respondents submits that the Petitioners have taken out the Notice of Motion in the same writ petition, seeking injunction against the Respondents not to enforce the notice of demand. It is submitted that the subject matter of the contempt petition and the notice of motion pending in the writ petition, is the same. Therefore, the petitioner shall move, if necessary, only after the notice of motion is decided. 2. The contempt petition is, therefore, disposed of. [S.K.Shah , J.] [S.K.Shah , J.] [S.K.Shah , J.]