IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No.10381 of 2011 Date of Decision:17.10.2011 Krishan Lal .... Petitioner Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panchkula and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. A.S. Tewatia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Mr. J.P. Bhatt, Advocate for the respondents. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 6.5.2011 (P-2). Short affidavit of P.K. Sharma, Secretary, HUDA, Panchkula, has been filed in the Court today. Para 2 of the said affidavit reads as under: “2. That the petitioner Sh. Krishan Lal (Seniority No.164) has been promoted as Assistant on 16.6.2011 and posted in the O/o Estate Officer-II, HUDA, Gurgaon as per seniority of Office Associate without prejudice to the finalization of the seniority list. Further his promotion is subject to the coutcome of pending court case and seniority dispute, if any. Promotion letter of petitioner is annexed as R-IV and C.W.P No.10381 of 2011 -2- he joined in the O/o Estate Officer-II, HUDA, Gurgaon on 12.9.2011 is annexed at R-V.” In view of the said affidavit, the present petition is rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such. 17.10.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE