(Spl.-H.C.A.S.,C.D.,78-e) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPELLATE SIDE SECOND APPEAL NO. 85 OF 2003 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Note, Office Memoranda of Quorum, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s Orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri J. E., Coelho Pereira, Senior Advocate with Shri S. Karpe, advocate for the appellants. Shri V. K. Bodke, advocate for respondent nos.2(a) and 2(d). CORAM : D. G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 22nd March, 2004 P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the appellants. He relies on a Judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Ishwar Ishwar Ishwar Dass Jain (dead) through LRs. Dass Jain (dead) through LRs. Dass Jain (dead) through LRs. vs. vs. vs. Sohan Lal (dead) by LRs. Sohan Lal (dead) by LRs. Sohan Lal (dead) by LRs., reported in AIR 2000 SC 426, and contends that the finding of fact reached by the courts below is erroneous and is reached without considering all material evidence on record and hence a substantial question of law arises. The Courts below have concurrently held that the appellants have not proved title - 2 - to the suit property. In my opinion, no substantial question of law arises in this Appeal. Hence the Second Appeal is dismissed summarily. D. G. KARNIK, J. mc.