1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No.987 of 2010. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|_______________________________________ 1. Heard counsel. 2. The petition involves several disputed questions of facts. The petitioner challenges order rendered by the Divisional Commissioner, Nasik Division, Nasik, whereby his Revision Application No.234-A/2009 came to be dismissed. It appears that the parties have filed suits against each other. The petitioner claims to be possessor of southern half area of the land in question. He has filed a suit for cancellation of sale-deed and that is pending. The Respondent No.9 has filed suit for injunction and that is pending. The disputed question as regards possession over the southern half portion of the land can not be determined by this Court since it requires fact finding on the basis of evidence which the parties are likely to adduce before the Civil Court. Consequently, this petition falls outside the pale of the writ jurisdiction and as such is dismissed. It is, however, clarified that no finding is rendered on merits and that the impugned judgment may not influence the Civil Court while considering the rival contentions. No costs. (V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) Dt.09.02.2010. asp/office/wp987.10