..i-nsBis»",a,^—c mCH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No^2730of2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Prasanna Kumari Tirkey, afler marriage Prasanna Kumari Ekka, wife of Xavior Ekka, aged about 50 years, working as Assistant Teacher Govemment Primaiy School Girhaildih, Tehsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur(C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Seeretary, Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Commissioner, Educatioaal Department, Pandit Ravishankar University, Campus, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education OfBcer, District Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA S.B. : HON'BLEJUSTICESHRISATISHK.AGNIHOTRI Preseirt: Mr. Harish Khuntia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vinay Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State / respondents. ORDER (Passed on 7th day ofMay, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointlysubmit that the fact and question oflaw involved in the present writ petition are tfae same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, ', and another (2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appeaiing for the respondents does not controvert the said subinission. L... 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kuniar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whetiier the petitioner has acquired B.T.I. Examination Certificate on her own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 aiid 01.03.1999 and farther whetfaer she has been paid two advance increinents or iiot. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satisli KAgnihotri Judge ^,.^-.—-—\