THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY And THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO W.P.NO. 12362 of 2011 ORDER: ( per AGR,J) Wife of missing person viz., P.V.Muralidhar Yadav-7th respondent invoked the habeas corpus jurisdiction of this Court for his production. The main grievance of the petitioner appears to be that her husband left Hyderabad on 15.04.2011 to Pune to appear for interview scheduled on 16.04.2011 for the post of Senior Legal Analysist and accordingly boarded A.P.S.R.T.C. bus to go to Pune on 15.04.2011. On 16.04.2011, the petitioner received phone call from her husband at 11.30 A.M. But, from 1.30 P.M. onwards, the petitioner could not contact him. Therefore, she lodged a complaint on 17.04.2011 on which basis Cr.No.321 of 2011 was registered under man missing and the matter was entrusted to the 5th respondent for investigation, but, according to the petitioner, he is lethargic in investigating the crime. Therefore, she prayed to issue necessary directions for production of her husband. Separate counter affidavits have been filed on behalf of respondents 4 and 5 and the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the 5th respondent discloses that on 05.05.2011 he addressed a letter to the Special Operations Team (SOT) to furnish call particulars of BSNL No.9494749069 and IMEA Nos. 910001152288870 and 910001152798870 of missing person and that he was on earned leave from 06.05.2011 to 25.05.2011 and after his return from leave on 26.05.2011, he has taken all possible steps for investigating and tracing the missing person with the available resources and also detailed about the investigation made by him in paragraph 6 of the affidavit. The counter affidavit filed by the 5th respondent clearly discloses that all the necessary steps have been taken to complete the investigation. Therefore, the allegation that the respondents are not taking any steps nor evincing any interest is belied in view of the detailed steps, which were taken during the course of investigation. Having regard to the above said fact, the official respondents are directed to complete the investigation and as and when the missing person is traced or investigation is completed, they shall file a report before the Magistrate concerned and a copy of the report shall be communicated to the petitioner. With the above direction, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. A.GOPAL REDDY,J RAJA ELANGO,J Dt. 25.07.2011 lvl THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY And THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO W.P.NO. 12362 of 2011 ( per AGR,J) Dt. 25.07.2011