IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKAND AT NAINITAL Misc. Application No. 7229/2010 in WRIT PETITION NO. 330(S/S) OF 2010 Dr. Vindu Mati Devi ……. Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …. Respondents. Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Shah, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 to 3. Mr. Bhuwan Joshi, Advocate for respondents 5 and 6. (Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J.) Heard Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 3 and Mr. Bhuwan Joshi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 5 and 6. Misc. Application No. 7229/2010 has been moved by the petitioner, wherein it is prayed that the writ petition be disposed of finally directing the respondents 5 and 6 to relieve her from their institution, in view of the fact that the petitioner got the appointment in Uttarakhand Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Haridwar as a lecturer. The grievance of the petitioner is that if the respondents do not relieve her, she can not join in the aforesaid institution. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 5 and 6 has stated that if the petitioner withdraw the writ petition and gives an undertaking that she will not claim any lien on the post she was working, then they will have no objection in relieving her. Accordingly the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 are directed to relieve the petitioner from their institution, within one week from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if the petitioner gives an undertaking with them to the effect that she will not claim any lien on the post she was working. With the aforesaid observation, Misc. Application is allowed and the writ petition is disposed of finally. 2 Copy of this order be supplied to the parties by tomorrow on payment of requisite fee. (B.S. Verma, J.) Dated: 30-08-2010 ISB