'lj IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) Vlo^1!1'!/2011 PETITIONER ^w ^<y^' ^^.. '<?'6>--' ^"~ RESPONDENTS Smt. Sangita Dorle (after marriage Bansod) W/o Shri Satish Kuniar Bansod aged about 43 years, Upper Division Teacher Govt. Boys Middle School Mopka, Block- Bilha District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipyr (C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Block- Bilha District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC—78 3Ilt% ?>I l^fNi ,' ^wasi^rgnw T -S^ •^rq^-TT, g^fTI^, TSTcTOy .M.1^J.^:^^..1''^S SO^T ^ra^ ('^rfyi^q) TCiTWilfN an^t SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Moh*n Shrivastava. J. 29^9-MII Shri Ajay Kumar Barik, cour Shri Chandresh Shriv State/respondents on advance GO|: Heard. Grievance ofthe petitioner entitled to receive two advance ir Course, the same has not been gr Counsel for the petitioner ^ Isel fbr the petittoner. ^stava, Panet Lawyer fbr the ;|y. |i the present petition is that though he is fcrements pursuant to passing of B. Ed. •brted to him. fLibmits that his case is squarely covered with number of decisions passecj matter of Asha Saacena Vs. Sta fSCJ 59. He submits that in view c( representation before respondent] for the petitfoner ateo craves for deoide the said representation as Counset for the State ateo by the petitioner, shatl be decidj possible. Aocordingly, the petition i^ aforesaid. However, if the petiti): •Wqf?PiT-f 'qK-fc'ff 4' fSvQ •^SRgTC ^affiraan^T by this Court including the one in the |e ofM.P. & Others, 2009 (Ul) M.PJ.R. this judgment besides many othere, the petittoner may be permitted to witfidraw this petitton with liberty to make a 'No.S, raising alt his grievances. Counsel direction to the competent authority to sxpedittously as possible. assures that representatton, if any, made id in accordance with law, as early as dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as ner makes a representatton within one month from the date of receipt of (^opy ofthis order, the competent authority shalt decide the same within a fur(ter period oftwo months from the date of its receipt in accordance with law.l _ _ _ ^-=-=-^ Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge