IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23648 of 2008 NOOR ALAM & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 16.07.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the State. Complaint Case No. 976/03 was instituted by complainant Jamila Khatoon within one month of her marriage alleging the commission of offence under Section 498A of the IPC and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioner no. 1 is the husband and petitioner no. 2 is the father-in-law of the complainant. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the reason behind institution of present case is that petitioner no.1 resides in the village working as teacher and complainant is not ready to live in the village. After the marriage she always lives with her parents at Muzaffarpur and only because petitioner no.1 is not ready to live with her at Muzaffarpur, present case has been filed with false allegations. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners, namely, Noor Alam land Md. Tasalim is allowed. In the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in the court below, they will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 976 of 2003 to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J)