IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 24813 of 2001 Between: 1 Ramesh Chander, S/o, Ramdhan, R/o. 8-13-69, Opp. National Police Academy, Sivarampalli, R.R. District. 2 Master Rahul Kumar, S/o. Siva Kailash, R/o. 8-13-69, Opp. National Police Academy, Sivarampalli, Ranga Reddy District. 3 Master Punith Kumar, S/o. Siva Kailash, Rep.by their Natural Guardian&father Siva Kailash, (Pettioners-2 and 3 are minors) ,R/o. 8-13-69, Opp. National Police Academy, Sivarampalli, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Rajendranagar Municipality, Rep. by its Commissioner, Rajendranagar, R.R. District. 2 Raghavendra Coop. Housing Society Ltd., (TB No. 803) Rep. by its Secretary, Professor's Colony, Raghavendranagar, Opp. National Police Academy, Sivarampally, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st Respondent herein and his subordinates in proposing to demolish the compund wall of the Petitioner's Plots bearing Nos. 29/A, 29/B, and 29/C situated in D-Zone of S. No. 50/4m 50/5 and 50/6 of Raghavendranagar Colony, Within the 1st Respondetn Municipality, Sivaramapally, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to law and consequently direct the 1st Respondent and his subordinates not to interferewith the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said property by the Petitioners and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.KANAKAIAH Counsel for the Respondent No.1: MR.V.VISWANATHAM The Court made the following : ORDER: When the matter was called on 10.04.2008, none appeared and it was posted to next week under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today also none appeared. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:17.04.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VVS}