HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DlVlSiON BENCH COMM: HON’BLE $HRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. & HON’BLE SHR! SUML KUMAR SINHA, J. Miscellaneaus Appeal No.27? of 2664 1 APPELLAN?S CLAEMANTS Smt Shivkumari, widow of Biharilai, aged 28 years Naveen Kumar, S/o Biharilal, aged 16 years Praveen Kumar, S10 BiharilaL aged 14 years Ku. Suman, D/o Biharilai, aged 10 years Ku. Rajani, D/o Biharilal, aged 8 years Ku. Ragini, D/o Bihariiai, aged 6 years Ku. Ranjana, D/o Biharilal, aged 4 years Appellant No. 2 to 7 are minor through their mother Smt‘ Shivkumari, widow of BiharHal, R/o Kota, Tahsii Kata, District Biiaspur (C.G.) Versus Bhoia Prasad, S/o MP Sharma, Rlo Vyapar Vihar, Biiaspur (CG) (Bus Owner) Ganesh Bahadur; S/o Nagesh (Driver) C/o Bhola Prasad, Vyapar Vihar Bilaspur (CG) The United indie insurance Company Ltd, through its Branch Manager, Rajendra Nagar, Bilaspur (C.G.) Kanhailai Shrivastava (since deceased), S/o Chamarulal Shrivastava, aged 65 years, R/o Padavpara, Kargi Road, Kota, Bilaspur (CG) Through the foliowing LRs : — 4(a) Ambika Bai, W/o Kanhaiiai, aged 6O years 4(b) Ku Laiita Shrivastava, D/o Kanhaiyaial, aged 25 years RESPONDENTS O‘lhlm\- 4 (c) Satish Shrivastava, S/o Kanhaila§ LRs 4 (a) to 4 (c) are R/o -#adaVpara, Neaa’ Santashi Mandir, Kargi Road, Kota Bitaspur (CG) 4 (d) Pawan Kumar Shrivastava, S/o Kanhaiyalal Shrivastava, R/o Dak Bangla, Near Rest House, Kota, Bilaspur (CG) Aggeal under Sectien 1?3 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 m: V Present: Shri lndrasen Sahu, ieamed cqunsei for the appeilants. r [Elone for the respondents. ' ORDER (18m Nevember, 2&98) The foliowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri lndrasen Sahu, learned counsel for the appeants n seeks permission to withdraw the appeai fiied by the appellants/ciaimants for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the 4m Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunai, ‘ Bilaspur, vide award dated 10.11.2003, passed in Claim Case No. 61/2002, with the liberty of fiiing a cross-objection for enhancement of the compensation in MA. No. 1188/2003 filed by the Insurance Company against the award. 2. Permission granted. 3. With the aboVe liberty, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. ///?dl:// V V y ., WMJ; _ i; ”Sdl-\ . smiKumarSi“",E/«i Chief Jusuce '}“f‘§e//;. , subbu ’7’: ii