AB 3223/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. SARMA Heard Mr. B. Choudhury, learned counsel, appearing for the petit ioners. Also heard Mr. B. S. Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam and perused the case dairy. By this application filed under Section 438 CrPC, the petitio ners, namely, Badal Biswas, Sri Dinesh Biswas and Smti. Harsundari Biswas have p rayed for pre-arrest bail in connection with Fatasil Ambari P.S. Case No. 246/20 11(Complaint Case No. 1607C /2011) under Sections 498(A)/314/307/506/34 IPC. The petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are already on interim bail. There i s no adverse report against them. The allegation made against the petitioners is that the petition er No. 1 being the husband of the informant and the petitioner Nos. 2 & 3 being the parents in law committed torture on the informant in connection with demand of dowry and caused abortion in respect of her pregnancy. Having heard the learned counsel for both the parties and con sidering the materials collected by the Investigating Officer, I do not find suf ficient reasons for extending the benefit of pre-arrest bail in favour of the pe titioner No. 1 aforesaid. Hence, the prayer of pre-arrest bail made in favour of the petitioner No. 1, namely, Badal Biswas is rejected. Considering entire aspect of the matter, I am of the opinion t he release of the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 on bail will not adversely affect the investigation of the case. Hence, the interim bail granted on 30.9.2011 is made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3, namely, Sri Dinesh Biswas and Smti. Harsundari Biswas shall appear before the Investigating officer within 10 days from this date for the purpose of recording their stateme nt in connection with the investigation, if so required.. With the above directions, this bail application is disposed of. Return the case diary.