IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Rev. No. 2925 of 2003 Date of Decision: April 23,2009 Mahabir Singh ................................................................Petitioner Versus Babu Lal ........................................................................ Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Ashutosh Mohunta Present: Mr. Atul Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. ... ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J. (Oral) The tenant has filed this revision petition impugning the judgment passed by the Rent Controller, Narnaul, dated 1.10.1999 and the judgment dated 31.10.2002 passed by the Appellate Authority vide which both the Courts have held that the rent of the shop in question was Rs.165/- per month and not 115/- per month as being claimed by the tenant. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the rent was only Rs.115/- and not Rs.165/- per month and that the landlord has tried to interpolate the figures. Thus, in sum and substance the dispute relates to a difference of Rs.50/- only per month in the rent. A perusal of the impugned judgments shows that both the parties had arrived at a compromise whereby the rent of the demised premises was agreed to be Rs.165/- per month. This figure is being disputed [ 2 ] Civil Rev. No. 2925 of 2003 by the petitioner who claims that the rent of the shop was agreed at Rs.115/- per month. Both the Courts have returned a concurrent finding of fact that the rent of the demised premises was Rs.165/- per month. In view of the aforementioned facts, I find no ground to interfere in the impugned judgments of both the Courts below and, accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed. 23.4.2009 ( ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA ) Rupi JUDGE