IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.31046 of 2011 Ranjay Thakur son of Pradip Thakur Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2/ 20.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 304-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that initially when the petitioner’s wife consumed poisonous medicines she was removed to the hospital but she died for which the petitioner gave a statement upon which UD case was instituted. It has further been submitted that the petitioner had taken care to save the life of his wife and later on the informant also resiled from his earlier statement and filed a petition in this regard which is annexed as Annexure-3. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No.17 of 2010 subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to 2 do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)