IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 8997 of 2008 Decided on: 25.2.2011 Desh Raj ……….Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others ...….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No. 1 & 2. None for respondents No. 3 to 5. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Petitioner is aggrieved by issuance of the final seniority list of Extension Officer (Industries). It has come in the reply that the respondents-State shall rectify the omission in final seniority list of Extension Officer (Industries) as on 30th June, 2000 issued on 22nd June, 2001 by issuing corrigendum. There is nothing on record to suggest that the corrigendum has been issued. 2. Consequently, the writ petition stands dispose of with a direction to the respondents-State to do the needful, if not already done, by issuing corrigendum, as undertaken in paras 7 & 8 of the reply, within a period of six weeks from today, failing which the consequences shall ensue. No costs. February 25, 2011. (Rajiv Sharma) (hl) Judge 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.