RSA No. 2142 of 2006 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No. 5282-C of 2006 and RSA No. 2142 of 2006 Date of Decision: August 25, 2009 Ranjit Kaur ...... Appellant Versus Om Parkash and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. S.K.S. Bedi, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. S.S.Dinarpur, Advocate for the respondents. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. CM No. 5282-C of 2006 For the reasons recorded in the application,the delay of 69 days in filing the appeal is condoned. CM stands disposed of. RSA No. 2142 of 2006 RSA No. 2142 of 2006 2 This appeal has been filed against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below dismissing the suit of the appellant for possession. However, during arguments a consensus has emerged between the counsel wherein it has been decided to resolve this entire dispute by payment of Rs. 20,000/- by the respondents to the appellant. Consequently this appeal is disposed of with the modification that the appellant would be entitled to Rs. 20,000/-. Learned counsel are agreed that the payment be made in favour of Chanan Singh, husband of the appellant by way of demand draft within a period of two months from today. In case the amount is not paid the appellant would be at liberty to execute the decree and in that case be further entitled to interest at the rate of 12% from today till the date of payment. It is further clarified that by this payment the respondents would have in fact purchased the share of Champa Devi and Bhushan. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE August 25, 2009 sunita