HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BSLASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. AppeJlants Respondents IVIIsc. AppeaS fC) No. 718 of 2010 1. Smt. Urmila Devi Nagesh, aged about 43 years, w/o late Shri Shivkumar Nagesh. 2. Manish Kumar Nagesh, aged about 20 years, s/o late Shri Shivkumar Nagesh. 3. Smt. Devki Bai Nagesh, aged about 70 years, w/o tate Shri Rammurlt Nagesh. A!i R/o Villagae-Pendridlh, Hirri- Mines, Poiice Station-Hirri, Tahsil- Bilha, district Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Amresh Kumar Pandey, s/o Shri Raghunath Prasad Pandey, R/o L/26-27, Sector-3, P.T. Deendayal Upadhyay Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Laxmi Kumar Nishad, S/o Shri Puriram Nishad, R/o Baghgahan, District-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3 NationaJ Insurance ©ompany LImited, Raipur, through Branch Manager, Office at First Floor, Taha Compiex, Rjng Road-2, Priyadarshni Nagar, Bilaspur (C.G.) ((Vllscellaneous aopeal under Section 173 of the IVSotor VehidesAct, 1988) Present: None for the appellants. ~T' llw' ORDER (22naJuly,2010) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, CJ. None for the appeilants. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. subbu Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge ^