1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1785 OF 2010 Kisan s/o. Bhaga Rasal & another ....Petitioners. Versus Balu Trimbak Sangale & others ....Respondents. Shri. H.D. Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri. V.S. Bedre, Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 24th March, 2010 PER COURT : 1. Heard respective counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In a suit presented by the petitioners/original plaintiffs, claiming a decree of perpetual injunction, an application was presented, seeking an order of interim injunction during the pendency of suit. The application, tendered by the petitioners came to be rejected by the Trial Court. The order of rejection of an application passed by the Trial Court has been confirmed by the First Appellate Court while dealing with the 2 Misc. Civil Appeal No. 87/2009. Thus, there is no order of injunction operating in favour of petitioners/original plaintiffs since the institution of suit. The concurrent findings recorded by the Courts below in respect of factum of possession of the parties over the suit block need not be interfered with while exercising the powers of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition is devoid of merit, hence, stands rejected. [ R.M. BORDE, J. ] ssc/wp1785.10