BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16297 of 2011 1 C. NEHRUPANDIAN 2 M. BERKMANS 3 A. GANESAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED No.4,5 & 6 Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI, CRIME NO.82/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.PALANISAMY Advocate For Respondent : M/S.C.RAMESH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 387, 406, 420, 467, 468, 120(b) and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No.82 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been arrayed as A4, A5 and A6 and they have been implicated on the allegation of granting loan to the de-facto complainant and on the ground of default in payment of the same, grabbed the land in respect of the settlement of dues and the occurrence said to have taken place in the year 1995-1996. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. 3. Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioners have been implicated on the allegation of granting loan to the de-facto complainant and on the ground of default in payment of the same, grabbed the land in respect of the settlement of dues and the occurrence said to have taken place in the year 1995-1996. 4. It is seen that the petitioners have been implicated on the allegation as stated above. The fact remains that the occurrence said to have taken place as early as in the year 1995-1996. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, this Court is inclined to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Judicial Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 5.30 p.m. for a period of six weeks and thereafter, they shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I MADURAI 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.A.PALANISAMY Advocate SR.No.44664 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16297 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 SMA/21.12.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/