IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-31134 of 2011 Date of decision: 19.12.2011 Inderjit Kaur ..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present: Mr.K.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sumeet Abrol, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Arun Chandra, Advocate for the complainant. * * * AJAY TEWARI, J.(ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr. P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case F.I.R. No. 87 dated 30.7.2011 registered under Sections 420, 406 IPC, at Police Station City Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, District Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar. On 14.10.2011 the following contention was noticed:- "Learned counsel has argued that even as per the FIR there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and the main allegations are against the son and daughter-in-law of the petitioner. The petitioner has constantly stayed away from them and rather had disinherited her son in the year 2007". Learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, has accepted these factual assertions on instructions from S.I. Sukhdev Singh and also stated that as per the inquiry it was found that the petitioner was involved in the crime and infact, step of disinheritance of his son and daughter-in-law was his well planned ploy. Learned counsel for tthe petitioner has again argued CRM No. M-31134 of 2011 -2- that the allegations pertains to the year 2007; the son and daughter-in-law of the petitioner went abroad 2-3 years ago and as per the FIR itself the complainant had started suspecting the intention of the petitioner after the publication of the disinheritance in the year 2007, but the complaint was filed in the year 2011. Learned counsel opposing are in denial of these factual assertions. In view of the matter, without commenting on merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In the event of arrest, petitioner shall surrender before the Investigating Officer and he shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. Petition disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) December 19, 2011 JUDGE Poonam(II)