IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO.895 OF 2009 (M/S) M/s Ganga Builders a Registered Partnership Firm having its Head Office at First Floor 3 Pritam Road, Dehradun, through its partners and three others. ……….. Petitioner. Versus Surjeet Kaur wife of late Sri Gurdev Singh resident of Ganga Nagar, Rishikesh, District Dehradun and two others. ………. Respondents Date: - June 19, 2009 Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Ms. Prabha Noliyal, learned counsel for the petitioners. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought a direction to the Second Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun to expedite the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of C.P.C. filed by the petitioners for rejection of plaint in Suit No. 556 of 2008, Surjeet Kaur Versus Indrajeet Singh and others pending before the Court of Second Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun. The facts of the present case in nutshell are that the respondent nos. 1 and 2 (plaintiff in the court below) filed Suit No. 556 of 2008 in the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun against the petitioners and respondent no.3 (defendants in the court below) which was later transferred to the court of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun. The Petitioners filed a writ petition no. 2018 of 2008 before this Hon’ble Court for quashing the proceeding of aforesaid suit and this Court directed the petitioner to file an application under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. for rejection of the plaint, vide order dated 19.11.2008. In compliance of the order dated 19.11.2008, the petitioners filed application under Order 7 Rule 11 of C.P.C. before the Trial Court on 25.11.2008 and also filed their written statement and objection against the interim injunction on 12.12.2008. ON 29.1.2009, the respondents also filed their objection against application under Order 7 Rule 11 of C.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that due to delaying tactics of respondent nos. 1 and 2, the application under order 7 Rule 11 could not be disposed of till the date. The prayer is innocuous and deserves to be accepted. The Second Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun is directed to decide the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of C.P.C. filed by the petitioner for rejection of plaint in Suit No. 556 of 2008, Surjeet Kaur Vs. Indrajeet Singh and others, expeditiously as far as possible. With the said direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (Interim Relief Application No. 4900 of 2009 stands disposed of accordingly.) (B.S. Verma, J.) 19.06.2009 RMY