IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37591 of 2009 RIKKI KUMAR @ RITESH KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 21.12.2009 Heard. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. for committing the offences under Section 386 and various other sections of the Penal Code. The petitioner wanted rangadari to be paid to him by one of the tenants of the informant who was running a shop in the complex built by him and on being refused to be paid, he came again in a few minutes with some hoodlums so as to assaulting the shopkeeper as brutally as to causing severe injury to him. The report on the antecedent of the petitioner was sought for by me and that is available at Flag ’A’ indicating that as many as five criminal cases were pending against the petitioner and further that three cases were reported on a single date, i.e.,11..2.2009. That, probably, could indicate the criminal bent of mind of the petitioner and considering that, in the light 2 of the facts of the case, I am not inclined to direct release of the petitioner on bail. The petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)