fim Cf. 16 '• IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR,(M.P,) %3^ CR.IMINAL REVT.SION No« APPLICANTS ! GF 2000 NO&T^APPLICAiKiT l^Smt<,Kala Devl AgrawalffBged about 52 years^ wife of Shrl R^S^Agraw-al 2»Ashok Agrawal»aged about 30 years^ son of Shrl R.«S^Agrawal Bo.th are resldent of Transport Hagara Korba ^Dlsfcrlcfc 5 Korba ^Clvll ,Dlstrlct s Bilaspur 9 (M <»P <,) -vs,- State of Madhya Pradesh through Police Statlon Economlc Offences Bureau,Bhopal Unlt - Raip'ur pDistrlct: Ralpur ^ (M<,P<,) CRIMINAL REVISION UNDER SEGTION 397/401 OF THE•CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE « XI-HC-22 W^T^T 'RFri^^n^ ^RW^W <^ ^^ -::^n^R, •g^N7re. "N^i^ ^TH^II-^Hf^ ( Qr-@-<P'v •'^Qt R^G|^6-t, "^ 200 ^rr^i i^n^R ^1N findty hear^todoy the 28-04-2006 Shri Avinc^h Mishra, learnet} Shri Ashfeh Siukta, G'ovt. The Revision te Jhe cspplicants are Qggrj@v| passed in M.J.C.No.19/1999 by the appli'cation for releasing got^ jnvestsgcstion of the offence undt Corruption Act., 1988 ^as rejecte^. Learned counse! that in the year 1994, Economic had sejzed ©oldASiJver ornamenl Devi Agrai^al dwmg a rdd conduct^ husband of appjjcant No.l. It was has not been fited b^ ths Economi< Shri R.S.Agrawol. It wos also e| No.720/1995 vide order doted Madhya Prodesh had ^iven a fjle the charge sheet wthin Q peri to the appjicant to repeot the 00 supurdnoma. Since a chdllan hasj period, the impugned order refusjn^i Sitver ornaments to the appJJcant counsei for the appljcants. ^flvocate for the State. cfiRfd^N 'R1WT? ^ fe^ Ti^1?K ^^[Ha^T ;d by the order dated 11-10-1999 Specld Judge/ BStaspur t^hereby & silver ornaments seized during ;r Section 13 (1)(E), Prevention of |?n behdf of the applicants argued pffences Wing, Bhopal. Unit-Raipur from the applieant t^o. l Smt. KclQ nductjsd on the house of Shri R.S.^rawal, tilso argued that titi dats the chQllan Offences Wing, Rdpur Unlt against j>ntended thot m Criminal Revteion p-09-1995 !-ton'ble Hjgh Court of sp^clfjc direction that the State should M of 4 months reseryjng the liberty app|ication for release of -Hie property jnot been filed within the stipulated to grant the custody of the Sold <S h|o.l, desfirves to be set aside. hk) M XI-HC-22 -3-ST ^PTFFf. •^W!%, t^ra^ ^T^T^T f^W'3^1 ^^w "^F^ O -t^^M' :WR<?TI'ww^ ^^A^O "^ 200 371^1 "^TF^R ^fi^ On the other hand, SNr opposed the appJi'cation, thougl^ foi HavJng ^nsidered rival| opinion that thte revision dese| order dated 27-09-1995 Hon%[ directed that the charge she^1 months, fdjing which the pra^ property on her ^upurdnamQ wojuld SyndcrbhaJ Ambald Desat 'i Ashteh ShukSa/ Sovt. Advocate has formoljy. submjssions, I am of the considered lv©sto be dbi^ed. It is seen that yjde !e High Court of Modhya Pradesh had |t should be fited t^ithin a persod of 4 ^r of the applicant for release of the be considered by the trjal Court. In Vs. State of Suirat with CM. MuddiQr Vs. S^ate ^f Su^nit reported 2002-A.I;R.-S.C.W.-5301. the Section-451 ofCr.P.C. should b4 and thc artjcles should not stotion. In the present case, ir^ Revision No.720/1995, upon fai wthln a ^tipulated penod, th| grcsnted the custody of the gc Numb€rB'51/1994under Sectioni Act.. 1988 from the house of been fjled^eventhough Q period The appjicants are entitled to seized m the aforesaid Crime N thus, manjfestlycrroneous and ^zjfe^ THq^ ^ ft^ i[f^5^ ^^^Fr-sn^f 1n Apex Court held that powers under exercised expeditiously ond judicjously ^ kept for a long time at the poHce ytew of the direction jssued in CrimJnal }ure of the E.O.W. to f?!e charge sheet ^ learned trial Judge ought to hove ild $& silver ornaments seized in Crime 43 CE) & (II)/Prevention of Corruption ^hri R.S.Agrc^d. hte charge sheet hos ]of more than 11 years has now elapsed. ^ustody of the ^old & Silver ornaments !{jmber-51/1994. The impugned order is 4ontrary to l<w. XI-HC-22 371^1^1 'f^ra'^rl^I '^'RN'-'^ft^ ^.^. » •^-^l '^?ra?^T, '^W1%, ^iTQy , - ..cy...''..^^.."......^:.^J <2-A'C3 ° ^m^T^^ra?""""'"""""""""""""""B^: 200 ^T^T ^^T^R 'H^T In thts vie^ of the matt4 Impugned order dated 11-10-1^99 Bila^pyr is set aside. It te djrecte^ seized from the house of Shri ft applicants on their executing a sattefaction of Special Judge,Bi| ^j^f<n<?1ti ^IH^ ^.ft^ li^^R '^^TPw^n^i _^ <r r, thfe Crimind Revision te allo^ed. passed fc^ the Specid Judge, that the ©olden<& Silver ornaments LS.Agra^al shall be r^turned to the supurdnamQ for Rs. 3 Lakhs to the taspur. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge