IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA C.W.P. No.500 of 2011 Date of decision: 8.4.2011 ------------------------------------------------- Dr. Arun Kumar Sood. Petitioner Versus CSK H.P.Krishi Vishvavidyalaya & another Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, J. Whether approved for reporting1? For the petitioners: Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate. For the respdt No.1: Mr.Lokender Paul Thakur, Advocate. No.2: Mr. Tarlok Chauhan, Advocate. Per V.K.Ahuja(oral). The petitioner has filed the present petition challenging the order passed by respondent No.1 transferring him from KVK Station, Kangra to KVK Station, Berthin. Notice of the petition was issued to the respondent. Reply has been filed by both the respondents. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record. 3. The petitioner, who was posted as Scientist/ Associate Professor at KVK Station, Kangra has been transferred to KVK Station Berthin in District Bilaspur against a specific project//scheme vice respondent No.2. The grievance of the petitioner is that both the posts are not equal, the scales applicable are different and that since he is a permanent employee he has been sent against a respondent No.2, who has been appointed against a specific project/scheme and against an ex-cadre post. Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? 2 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.2 who was posted against the post of ICAR Scheme/KVK , which post is co-terminus with the project. The grievance of the petitioner also is that respondent No.2, who is junior and has been posted against an ex-cadre post in a project has been posted against permanent post vice the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.2 cannot be posted outside the project i.e. KVK Station at Berthin as she is not covered by the transfer policy. 5. All these questions are to be determined by respondent No.1. The petitioner is directed to file a representation to respondent No.1 alongwith a copy of the writ petition in which he shall put his grievances in the representation filed by him, he can also make other submissions apart from what he has alleged in the writ petition. 6. Accordingly, respondent No.1 is directed to consider all these questions and pass appropriate order in accordance with Rules. The representation as above alongwith a copy of the order, shall be presented to the first respondent within 15 days from today and he shall decide the question as far as possible within three weeks thereafter He shall also give personal hearing to the petitioner and respondent No.2, if prayed for. 7. It is made clear that till the orders are passed by respondent No.11 on the representation, the position as it exists today, shall be maintained qua posting. Copy Dasti. 8th April, 2011 ( V.K. Ahuja ),J. (SDS)