WP(C) 1128/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE A C UPADHYAY Heard Mr. K. K. Phukan, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, and Mr. B. K. S harma, learned Standing counsel, Social Welfare Department, Government of Assam, appearing on behalf of the respondents. The petitioner’s case in brief is that the petitioner being a local resi dent of Gobardal village (Lanka Supa), under Tihu Police Station, applied for th e post of Anganwadi worker in Pachim Ansha Lanka Para Anganwadi Centre, but to h er utter surprise, her name did not find place in the select list, instead, resp ondent No. 5, namely, Smt. Sewali Barman, was selected and appointed for the sai d post in spite of the fact that respondent No. 5 is not a local resident of Pac him Ansha Lanka Para. Hence, being aggrieved by the action of the authority in selecting and appointing the respondent No. 5 against the post of Anganwadi work er in Pachim Ansha Lanka Para Anganwadi Center, the petitioner is before this Co urt by filing the instant writ petition with a prayer for quashing and setting a side the order of appointment of respondent No. 5. Considering the grievance raised in this writ petition, and as agreed to by the learned counsel appearing for the parties concerned, this Court deems it fit to direct respondent No. 2, namely, Director of Social Welfare, Assam, to m ake an inquiry with regard to the fact raised by the petitioner as to whether th e respondent No. 5 is a local resident of Pachim Lanka Para and, if the above fa ct is found to be true, to pass necessary order(s) accordingly. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of four weeks fro m the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. With the above direction, this writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. No costs.