IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13630 of 2010 BRAJ BHUSHAN TIWARY, Son of Late Prabhu Nath Tiwari, R/O Village- Sareya, Ward No. 6, Sadhu Chowk, Gopalganj, P.S. & District-Gopalganj. ........Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR..................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 3. 25.05.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion of the bail petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail in a case registered under Section 364(A) of the I.P.C. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he was not named in the F.I.R. and his name sprang up in confession of co-accused. The victim was recovered after ½ an hour of the occurrence and the victim in his statement under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. has not named the petitioner. The aforesaid contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner has not been controverted by the learned A.P.P. after going through the case diary. It is further contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that though the 2 petitioner is involved in three other cases in which the petitioner is on bail. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner for the purposes of bail only, let the petitioner, Braj Bhushan Tiwary, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Though) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalganj P.S. Case No. 124 of 2009, Sessions Trial No. 21 of 2010. The petitioner will appear regularly during trial and if he fails to appear on three consecutive dates during trial the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)