IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** C.W.P. No.394 of 2011 Date of Decision:20.12.2011 Manjit Kaur .....Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. G.S. Bal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Kavita Arora, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Yashwinder Paul Singh, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) The prayer made in the petition is for issuance of direction to the respondents to release the pensionary benefits to the petitioner including CPF, DCRG, leave encashment, pension etc. upon her retirement and all consequential benefits arising therefrom. Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.3 and 4 submits that necessary payment has been made to the petitioner and now nothing remains due to be paid to the petitioner. Learned counsel has also filed an affidavit in this regard wherein it has been mentioned that the petitioner has been released salary and other retiral dues. In response to this, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is difference in calculation and the payment has not been made to the petitioner as per her entitlement. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for respondents No.3 and 4, the present petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as having rendered infructuous. However, in case, any difference of calculation is there, the petitioner is at liberty to move a representation by mentioning all details and the respondents are directed to look into the representation and pass necessary order. December 20, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE