IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-13389 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 7, 2010 Paramjit and another .....Petitioners v. State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Vivek K.Thakur, Advocate for the petitioners. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondent nos.5 to 7 not to harass the petitioners and with further directions to respondent nos.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners. Heard. It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner no.2 has already moved application, dated 30.4.2010, Annexure P2, before respondent no.2, i.e., Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar, in this regard, and that the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent no.2 is directed to look into the same, in accordance with law. Hence, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, i.e.,Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 30.4.2010, Annexure P2, already stated to have been moved to him by petitioner no.2, in this regard. 7.5.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge