1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 265 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1611 OF 2008 Kamlesh Shivaji Majethia .......Applicant And Mohan Prabhakar Amre ..... Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra ....... Respondant. Mr. P.R. Arjunwadkar for the Applicant Mr. Ajay Varma i/b H.E. Palwe for the petitioner Mrs. Usha Kejariwal APP for State. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & R. V. MORE, JJ. DATED: 14th NOVEMBER, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Arjunwadkar, learned counsel, for the applicant. It appears that the petition has been filed to demolish the construction which has been carried out by the present applicant. In these circumstances, the present applicant is a necessary party to the petition. Therefore the original petitioner is hereby directed to add the applicant as party to the petition No., 1611/08. Application is accordingly disposed of. (R.V. MORE, J.) (S. B. MHASE, J.) 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 266 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1611 OF 2008 Madhusudan Krishna Nigalye .......Applicant And Mohan Prabhakar Amre .......Petitioner. versus State of Maharashtra ....... Respondant. Mr. P.R. Arjunwadkar for the Applicant Mr. Ajay Varma i/b H.E. Palwe for the petitioner Mrs. Usha Kejariwal APP for State. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & R. V. MORE, JJ. DATED: 14th NOVEMBER, 2008. P.C.: 1. Mr. Arjunwadkar, learned counsel, for the applicant states that the criminal application No. 266/08 is for addition of parties. However, he submitted that he has already made the applicant as a party. Therefore he is not pressing the application no. 266/08 and is disposed of accordingly. (R.V. MORE, J.) (S. B. MHASE, J.) 3