1 (APL 667 of 2011) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.667 OF 2011 Otaram Amraramji Choudhary & Ors. ...Applicants Vs. Ganesh Ashok Pathare & Anr. ...Respondents ----- Mr.G.K. Jadhav for Applicants Mr.Prem Sagar Bind for Respondents Mrs. V.R. Bhosale -APP for State ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE, & A.M. THIPSAY, JJ. DATED: 27th September, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants, Respondents and the learned APP for the State. 2. The Applicants have filed this application under section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the FIR which is registered with A.P.M.C. (Agricultural Product) Police Station, Navi Mumbai for the offence punishable under section 51 and 63 of the Copy Right Act, 1954. The Respondent No.1 who is the Original Complainant has filed an affidavit in reply, in which he has stated that pursuant to the complaint filed by him the goods were seized by the police and it appears that the goods 2 (APL 667 of 2011) which were seized by the police are genuine goods and there is no infringement of the provisions of sections 51 and 63 of the Copy Rights Act. In the affidavit in reply, therefore, it is stated that the allegations made against the Applicants are withdrawn by him and he has no objection if the complaint is quashed. 3. In view of the affidavit in reply filed by the Respondent No.1, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 10(a) and disposed of. 4. The learned APP for State, after taking instructions from the Investigating Officer, who is present in the court submits that the goods which were seized are in fact genuine goods, which were stored by the Applicants at the behest of the some other party. (A.M.THIPSAY J.) (V.M. KANADE J.)