1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1735/2010 ( Syed Saif Tauheed s/o Late Syed Abdul Kalam and two others .vs. State of Maharashtra ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. Abdul Bashir, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. J.B. Jaiswal, APP for Respondent. .......... CORAM : P.D. KODE, J. DATED : JANUARY 20, 2011 Heard. The applicants have been granted ad-interim protection vide order dated 28.10.2010 in connection with Crime No. 294/2010 for offence under Section 324 read with 34 of I.P.C. The reply filed by the prosecution discloses that the investigation is practically complete and the prosecution is likely to file the charge sheet within a short while. The learned APP has also not pointed out any circumstance of applicants having committed breach of conditions imposed while granting them ad- interim protection. Similarly no other circumstance is brought to the notice by the learned APP for varying with the earlier order passed. The perusal of the reply and the stage at which the investigation stands, it is difficult 2 to perceive any reason for presence of the applicants being necessary for custodial interrogation. Having regard to all these circumstances, the ad-interim anticipatory bail granted in favour of the applicants deserves to be confirmed on the conditions on which the same was granted. Application stands disposed of. Hamdast allowed. In view of disposal of Criminal Application No. 1735/2010, Criminal Application (APPP) Nos. 1065/2010 and 1156/2010 also stand disposed of. JUDGE halwai