C.W.P. No.14996 of 2007 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 22.09.2008 Parveen Sharma and others .....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH. HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY. Present : Mr.Shiv Kumar, Advocate, for petitioners. Ms.Ritu Punj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Mr.Arvind Rajotia, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 to 4. -.- UMA NATH SINGH, J. Reply on behalf of Chief Secretary to Government of Haryana, dated 17.9.2008 with annexure, filed in Court, is taken on record. Paragraphs 3 & 4 thereof, on reproduction, read as:- “3. That the Commissioner, Gurgaon Division, Gurgaon, vide his report dated 8.9.2008 has concluded “that the Engineering Department is responsible for delay and Planning Department contributed by not putting the file to the higher authorities when the report was not forwarded by the Engineering Department”. Upon this report, it has been decided by the Government to take strict disciplinary action as per procedure provided in Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1987 against the officers responsible for causing delay in deciding the case of the petitioners regarding allotment of alternative land. The list of responsible officers is placed at Annexure A-1. Disciplinary action will also be taken against any other officer found negligent in this case. C.W.P. No.14996 of 2007 2 4. That it is also brought to the kind notice of this Hon'ble Court that it has been decided by the Government to allot alternative land out of Municipal Corporation, Faridabad land bearing Khasra No.183 near Panchayat Bhawan, to Sh.Ravi Shankar Sharma, father of the petitioners and others. A copy of the letter from Financial Commissioner & Principal Secretary to Government, Haryana, Urban Local Bodies Department, to the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Faridabad, is paced at annexure A-2.” We are satisfied with the aforesaid averments in reply. As petitioners have made a representation, we dispose of this writ petition with directions to authority concerned to decide and dispose of petitioners' representation on merits within a period of 4 weeks from receiving a copy of this order. This writ petition is, thus, disposed of. (UMA NATH SINGH) JUDGE 22-09-2008 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) *mohinder JUDGE Whether this judgment be referred to Reporter or not? YES/NO