1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1113 OF 2010 Mukesh Umakant Tiwari .. Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr.Tushar Sonawane for the applicant. Mrs.A.A.Mane APP for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 13/10/2010. PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is the second application for bail. The earlier application for bail was rejected on merits. It is true that at the time of rejecting the earlier application, a liberty was granted to the applicant to apply for bail afresh, if the trial does not commence within six months from the date of the order. To my specific query made to learned counsel for the applicant, he fairly submitted that the applicant did not approach to the trial Court for expeditious hearing of the case. Keeping that in view and for the reasons recorded in the order dated 13.7.2009, on merits, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Hence the application is rejected. The trial is expedited. It is open to S 2 the applicant to apply for fixing early date of hearing before the trial Court. If any such application is made, the trial Court shall fix the case for trial expeditiously. With these observations the application is rejected. (D.B.Bhosale, J.)