-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5753 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.5753 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.5753 OF 2005 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.2273 OF 2005 APPEAL ST.NO.2273 OF 2005 APPEAL ST.NO.2273 OF 2005 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: APRIL 21, 2006. APRIL 21, 2006. APRIL 21, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The report of the bailiff dated 28th February 2006 shows that the Respondent No.2 has expired on 26th May 2005. No steps are taken for bringing on record the legal representatives of the deceased Respondent No.2. Hence, Application stands abated as against the Respondent No.2. 2. Office noting shows that rest of the Respondents are duly served with the notice. None appears for the Respondents. Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 3. It is made clear that the First Appeal will stand abated as against the Respondent No.2. 4. Office will assign appropriate date for hearing as to the admission of the -2- Appeal. Judge. Judge. Judge.