IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1925 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision: 28.10.2009 Rajender Parshad ......Petitioner(s) Versus Smt. Anuradha Gupta, IAS, Secretary ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Kuldeep Khandelwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) CM No.25290-CII of 2009 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. COCP No.1925 of 2009 The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that vide judgment dated 17.4.2009, CWP No.4183 of 2006 was allowed in terms of order passed in CWP No.19693 of 2004 titled as Sushil Kumar v. State of Haryana, by which the petitioner has been held entitled to compassionate appointment under the policy of 1995 on the ground that his father was invalidated from service on medical grounds. The question as to which rules would be applicable for granting compassionate appointment to a dependent of the employee, which were applicable on the date of invalidation/death of such an employee or date of consideration of the case of such a dependent of the employee, has been referred to a larger Bench, in CWP No.5335 of 2009, vide order dated 2.4.2009. In view of the aforesaid fact, at this stage, it cannot be said that the respondents have disobeyed the order passed by this Court, therefore, I am not inclined to take cognizance of this petition. Dismissed. October 28, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE