IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14063 of 2011 ARUN YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 21.06.2011 It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that name of the petitioner has wrongly been typed as Arun Kumar in place of Arun Yadav. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Admittedly, victim has been recovered and her statement under section 164 of the Cr. P.C has been recorded. In the aforesaid statement, victim stated that one Pintu Yadav and Arvind Yadav forcibly kidnapped her and subsequently, she was raped by co-accused Pintu Yadav. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Arun Yadav, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in Gamhariya P.S. Case no. 22/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)