IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS FRIDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2010 / 14TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 4275 of 2010(H) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- KALLARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KALLARA, TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI.ANAMPACHA SURESH. BY ADV. SRI.S.MOHANDAS RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL) KURAVANKONAM, TRIVANDRUM. 2. DEPUTY SUPDT.OF POLICE, ATTINGAL, TRIVANDRUM. 3. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PANGODE, KALLARA, TRIVANDRUM. 4. SRI.THULASIDHARAN, SUNGLAVIL VEEDU, PATTARA, KALLARA, TRIVANDRUM. 5. SRI.SHAMHAD, SHAMNAD MANZIL, THOTTINPURAM, MUTHUVILA, KALLARA, TRIVANDRUM. G.P. SHRI T K VIPINDAS FOR R1 TO R3 ADV. SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM FOR R4 & 5 SRI.DIPU.R FOR R4 & 5 SMT.MERCIAMMA MATHEW FOR R4 & 5 SRI.K.S.HARIDAS FOR R4 & 5 SRI.V.RENJITH KUMAR FOR R4 & 5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 4275 of 2010 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 : A COPY OF COMPLAINT DT. 21.1.2010 SUBMITTED TO 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 : A COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 23.1.2010 EXT.P3 : A COPY OF COMPLAINT DT.21.1.2010 TO 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 : A COPY OF COMPLAITN DT.21.1.2010 SUBMITTED TO 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P5 : A COPY OF REPORT DATED 29.9.2009 SUBMITTED BY THE DY.DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH TRIVANDRUM EXT.P6 : A COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 23.10.2009 SUBMITTED BY THE EX. ENGINEER, LSGD, TRIVANDRUM. EXT.P7 : A COPY OF THE REPORT DT.2.12.2009 ISSUED BY CE, LSGD. EXT.P8 : A COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT.16.3.2010 IN W.A.460/10 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : EXT.R4(a) : TRUE COPY OF THE SUSPENSION ORDER DATED 7.1.2010 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT. EXT.R4(b) : TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT NUMBERED AS O.P. NO. 961 OF 2001 BEFORE THE OMBUDSMAN. EXT.R4(c) : TRUE COPY OF I.A. NO. 20 OF 2010 // TRUE COPY// K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 4275 of 2010 H - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT Joseph, J. We heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. We have already passed an interim order. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interim order may be directed to be maintained for a period of three weeks from today. 2. In view of the facts of the case, we are inclined to dispose of the writ petition directing that the interim order will remain in force for a period of three weeks more. Ordered accordingly. (K. M. JOSEPH) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) Judge tm