^^ IN^THE HIGH COUH? OF CIiHAT'ITSSARH AT m:lA^TJR (C.G») w,,P, No«»^^'t~*./20-05 Petitloiier k ^ fcl^ .^ ^^>0;-' ^\^"y r.^^" ^l^-' Respondffits ^ ^ibodfo Kacaar Jha> aged 43 years? a/o late Shrl Kedaxaa-feh <Tha» daily .'tfeges Office AsstW? »anlcipal Coypomtioia, ^ilai, Mstt»£3UHa(C.G<). " (1) Th@ State Qovt.of Chhatti.s@trh, Through l^e Secretery, Nagery Pr@sbashaB & Bevelopa^it Dsparfcffl^at, aovt, of Chhattls^irh, Ralpur, (C»S.)• (2) Miiaioipal Cotporatioo, B3hilal» Th^ugb the GomaigsloBes' Nanicipal Corpoa?atlon Bhi3ai, Distt* Barg (C,Q»)« ^ Wa'E PETITIQN WDSB ARTICte 226/22f OF THE GONS3STUTION OF INOTA, .^-^ _£;a^^:^.. XI-HC-22 131^1'^T t^F^n^? ^<!w '^ritcT ^? ^lt^ld^f, ^^1<i<t<o, fa<rtl^y .^^^, •€y N1^8<nS W^8l<^ 3:n^r xra^ ,.....^.S..%lfe.x.^...^ ^ •i^r^T' 311^1 ^WIWtrf^t 11.02.2004 SIiri N.L. Shrivastava, q Shri Ranbir Siiigh, Govt Tlie petitioner lias prefe 226 &227 ofUie Constitution 3unsel for the petitioner. Adv. for the State. |red tliis writ petition mider Article bf India. ^The petitioner's case i^ wago^ einployee on 20,10. contiiiued to discharge his du|ies aJl of a sudden feU Ul ao.d fhat Iie was apponited as daily 1986 as Of&ce Assistaat ao.d he .u^ies tiU 25.10,1989. The petiUoner relmamed 1U tiU 25.02.1997 aad he dutifcks could not perform his 26.02.1997 wifh a mcdical c / hc wa^ not aJlowcd to work unk.< Assistaiit Cominissiors.er. Murs Secretaiy^ Deparfcoient of Urb^ GoveramentofC.G. on 10.02. has not been repHed tiU date. Leamed counsel for petitioner inay be aUowed to <3hHid141rt ^H<??( "9 fe^ <Rn'^i< ^'3?^FT3??^T Thereafter, he reported cn ;ili&cate, which was acccptcd but aid hi^ casc was fon¥ardeclby thc ^.cipal Corporation, Bhiloi to Under jm. Adsiiinistratioii & Developm.ent, £001for tastractions but fhe saine ^he petitioner subm.its that tlie ^nake a detsfled rcprcseutation to XI-HC—78 aTi^r^i^fW ^T^T 3iR^T ^^W '^ ^sr '^TRT^FT, %9Tl1<H^<o, f®idiylj>< <^? '^\ ^iw^n'^iw^ M...:7>S.^/.€3^•^200 ^n^T Tra^ (^t^1?) 1^?^T ^ift^f ^iT^l respondent No,!, to w^hiclji objection. Haviag heard the havmg rcgard to fhe facts petitioner is allowed to make| his grievaiices wifhm ten d^ aiid io. tum, respondent No. 1| of the petitloiier shall decidej of tliirtv days from the date leat-ned 4iid No. 10,220/2003 for urgent Ceitified copy a©per n^les, 'wrf^zjt^ TTFr^ff ^* ft^ '^[^PFgR ^ 3;tfW3TT^T learaed State counsel has no counsel for the parties aad circuinstaaces of tlie case, Uie |a detmled rcpresentation raisiag all i4ys froin today to respondent No.l after cousidermg all ftie grievao.ces Uie represeiitation vdttim a period cjf receipt of the sanie tn aa objective law. maiiner in. accordasice with tJIie Witli fhc abovc dircctiojas thc pctition stauds disposcd of In vicw of fhis ord^r, M.(W.)P.No.3225/2003 &:. I.A. hJearirLg staiid disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge r%- •^