IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16446 of 2011 Chetan Sinha @ Chetan Kumar Sinha Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 24.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 420 and 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that the complainant was persuaded by this petitioner and one Shivesh Kumar for becoming the stockist of the Kosi area on behalf of Royal Gold Mustard Oil for which the draft of Rs. 4,00,000/- was given to the company and cheque of Rs. 2,00,000/- were given to the petitioner and one Shivesh Kumar but muster oil was not supplied to the complainant and subsequently, the cheque was issued which got bounced. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cheque was issued by Vijay Kumar Tripathi and the agreement was between the 2 complainant and the company. Hence, the petitioner cannot be held responsible, moreover, other similar situated accused person has been granted anticipatory bail. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Complaint Case No. 1257C/2006, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)