IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M 9326 of 2009 Date of decision: 07.05.2009 Gurdarshan Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARBANS LAL Present: Mr. Ram Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Hoshiar Singh Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Kaushik, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana *** Harbans Lal, J.( Oral) This petition has been moved by Gurdarshan Singh under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for issuance of appropriate and necessary direction to the District Magistrate, Yamuna Nagar – respondent No.3 to accept surety bonds as per Warrant for the Temporary Release dated 20.02.2009 (Annexure P-1) issued by respondent No.1, whereby, the petitioner has been granted six weeks' parole for the purpose of agricultural operations. In reply, filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 & 3, it has been admitted that agricultural parole was granted to the petitioner after completion of legal formalities. It is averred that the papers were thereafter sent to the answering respondent i.e. the District Magistrate, Yamuna Nagar – respondent No.3 for acceptance of the bail bonds / surety bonds of the petitioner, but in the meanwhile, the Model Code of Conduct for the guidance of political parties and candidates came into operation because of the coming Lok Sabha elections. CRM No. M 9326 of 2009 -2- I have heard the learned counsel for the parties, besides perusing the record with due care and circumspection. This petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate, Yamuna Nagar – respondent No.3 to accept the bail bonds / surety bonds as per warrant for the temporary release dated 20.02.2009 ( Annexure P-1) issued by respondent No.1 within a period of one week from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Disposed of accordingly. May 07, 2009 ( Harbans Lal ) amrit Judge