IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-27180 of 2008 Date of decision : 1.12.2008 Raj Singh @ Raj Kumar .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. J.P.Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Manjari Nehru, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab S. D. ANAND, J. In support of the averment that the petitioner had actually married the prosecutrix and that the latter was major, learned counsel relies upon Annexure P/2 (voter Identity Card issued by the Election Commission of India) where the age of the prosecutrix (as on 1.1.2006) is given to be 18 years. Reliance is also placed upon certification Annexure P/1 issued by the Gurudwara Jiwan Sudhar Sabha, Sector 32-C, Chandigarh certifying the solemnisation of marriage between the petitioner and the prosecutrix. Without expressing any opinion on merits, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. December 01, 2008 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE