Crl. Misc No. M 24329 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M 24329 of 2011 Date of decision : October 14, 2011 Parveen, ...... Petitioner v. State of Haryana, ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Virender Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG Haryana for the respondent. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in case FIR No.347, dated 18.8.2010, registered under Sections 302/34 of the IPC and Sections 25, 29(A)(B), 54, 59 of the Arms Act, at Police Station Sampla, District Rohtak. On 23.8.2011, the following contention was noticed :- “ Learned counsel has argued that Manoj has been placed in Column No.2 by the police but the allegation against him is much more serious than those against the petitioner who has only been accused of grappling with the complainant.” Counsel for the petitioner has further argued that even the pistol which was allegedly used by co-accused Vikas was purchased by him Crl. Misc No. M 24329 of 2011 ::2:: and that the petitioner has now been in custody since 20.8.2010. Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from ASI Baljit Singh, has accepted these factual assertions. She has further stated that only two out of twenty two witnesses have been examined. In these circumstances, without commenting upon the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner. Bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, Rohtak. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) October 14, 2011. JUDGE `kk'