IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26092 of 2010 MD.IRSHAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.07.2010. The petitioner was granted bail on 21.05.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 14571 of 2010 in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 67 of 2010 registered under Sections 414/34 of the I.P.C. The learned C. J. M., Bettiah, West Champaran, was directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner as well as the fact that the seized vehicle is registered in the name of the petitioner’s brother-in-law only then the bail bonds were to be accepted. Subsequently it was found that the vehicle in question was registered in the name of the brother-in-law of the petitioner but that registration was found to be forged. Hence the petitioner could not be released in pursuance to the order dated 21.05.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14571 of 2010 which necessitated to file the present bail application. It is submitted that Annexure-3 reflects that the brother-in-law of the petitioner purchased the vehicle from Arshul Majeed on whose confession the present case 2 was initiated which gave bonafide belief to the petitioner that vehicle was registered in the name of his brother-in-law. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not involved in any other case except present one. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, Md. Irshad be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 67 of 2010. The learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner fails to appear on three consecutive dates or he gets involved in similar type of case. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)