IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30903 of 2009 1. RANJEET KUMAR 2. RAJU KUMAR ------------------ PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 5.11.2009 By order 8.9.2009 application on behalf of petitioner no.1 was permitted to be withdrawn. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner no.2 and the State. I agree with the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner no.2 that no offence under section 368 or 307 IPC is made out which only are non-bailable offence as act of section 307 IPC is pressing of the neck of the informant without injury and no allegation for offence under section 368 IPC is made out as dispute was prevailing in between the parties for ancestral property including the house which also is resolved now and to corroborate the same, an affidavit has been filed in the court below. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner no.2 Raju Kumar shall be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender within 2 one month from the date of communication of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in Jehanabad P.S.Case No. 157 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) A.I.