..-iVS^ ^;1"' ....-•° <^b '.••:"^~:\"^><" .b ^y^'"' ^^/ <:<• ^^ V-- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (Sl N0. 3 L/ 4 U /2009 PETITIONER K.P.Dindoure, aged about 46 years, S/o. Shri Mahajan Dindoure, R/o. Range Officer, Jatga Range, Forest Division Katghora, District Korba (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Joint Secretary Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 'S.P.Kaushik Office ofworking plan, Korba (C.G.) WRIT PBTITION UNDERARTJCLE 226^0F_THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT HL THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PXOHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER ^IRECTLQN OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER 'S'Sf "ill^ld^ ytll'y'Ko, fqdl'M^ .M^(^.M-3^^ 3i]?5I W T^'IRi' wii siit?r ww 's^aiwgfeisn^ STIC! 15-07-2809: Mr. Sunil Otwani, coitnsel for the petitioner. Mr. Yash'want Siriyl" Ms. Sunita Jain, PL forthe onn j.n. Lonani, cou Challenge in the ins 30.6.2009 (Annexure-P-1) v/hich the petitioner who is has been transferred from to Korba Forest Division wc Counsel for the petit! of postina he has ioined so therefore he ouaht not to hs He further submits that as forest ranaer shal! be ooste than three vears in his er petitioner, he has renderec oiaces and therefore the tri He further submits that eail for shiftina. the Detltioner representation, the same ^l was cancelied. Lastjy he been issued iust to accorr] comina in olace of the oetitl '^raf^Nt?T 'RTIMf ^ t^c^ <r3|<^R ^'atRTOsn^l Thakur, Dy. Adv'ocsts GsnsrQl w'lth Btate. fisei for responaent NO. o. :ant writ petition is to the order dated passed by the respondent No. 2 by workina on the post of Range Offlcer iataa Ranae, Forest Division Katahora |rking pian, on administrative ground. oner subm'rts that in his present piace fnetime in the month of Julv, 2007 and been transferred before 2 'A years. per the circu'ar of the Government no d in the office of v./orklna pian for more itire service career. Accordina to the more than 3 vears of service in such ansfer order is bad on this count a3so. lier also the simiiar attsmpt was made sut when the Detitioner has made a /as considered and his transfer order iubmits that me order impugned has modate the respondent No. 3 who is oner on his own reauest Bs'itw' BMB • \ sraas%. ,<^:,^t.6, a •<.; .4*' 'w>. -^. ''SHE—IS Sil^! ^iT 1^-ih; ~s"n 3lR?l aiiii* ^5£f'<<ww<i, •aviwie, hwvy. 311^1 iraqT (i|qf3^T) i^grw "Bre^ s^-ff ——2-—' On the other hand, is that the transfer is an inc petitioner can be transfei reauired. At this staae, counse the present writ petition wit respondent No. 1 raisina ail Accordlnaiv, the writ with the iibertv as reDresentation within a peric of GODV of this order, authorities concerned withln the date of its receipt. It is made clear thal ODinion upon the merits oHV\ wouid be at iiberty to d| accordance with law. qiNwih tnwif 'if 'fs^zt <fa+s;i< ^? aiRm sn^r larned counsel for the State su'omits iiderit of serace and therefore the fred if administrative exigency so for the Detitioner seeks to withdraw h libertv to fiie representatlon to the rtis anevances. petition is dismissed as withdrav/n psaid. !f the petitioner makes a |d of 10 davs from the date of receipt ^ same wouid be decided bv the a further oeriod of three v»'eeksfrom this court has not expressed anv !e case and the authorities concerned icide the reDresentation strictiv in Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge