S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11332/2010 Kal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 09.12.2010 HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J. Mr. Ravindra Singh, for the petitioner. ... By this petition for writ the petitioner is seeking regularization of his services in Class-IV cadre of the respondents. A prayer is also made by the petitioner for grant of regular pay-scale prescribed for Class-IV employees with the respondents. For the same cause, a petition for writ was earlier preferred i.e. SBCWP No.2404/1995 and that came to be allowed under order dated 12.10.1998 with the following directions : “Looking into the facts and circumstances of the present case, a similar direction is required to be given to the respondents to pay the petitioner the minimum of regular pay scale of Class-IV employee from July, 1995 i.e. from the date of filing of the writ petition and also to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization.” An appeal preferred by the employer also came to be rejected by Division Bench of this Court on 27.4.2006. As such, for the same cause second petition for writ is not maintainable. Dismissed accordingly. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. Sanjay/ S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11275/2010 Mahendra Singh Sodha Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 06.12.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Pramendra Bohra, for the petitioner. ... By this petition for writ, the petitioner has assailed validity, correctness and propriety of order dated 19.11.2010 (Annex.2) passed by the Deputy Director (Establishment), State Insurance & General Provident Fund Department, Jaipur transferring the petitioner, an Upper Division Clerk from Jodhpur City to Barmer. The order impugned is appelable under Rajasthan Civil Service (Service Matters) Appellate Tribunal Act, 1976. The instant petition for writ is preferred without exhausting the statutory remedy available. I do not find any just reason to entertain this petition for writ without getting the alternative remedy exhausted. Accordingly, the petition for writ is dismissed. The petitioner is at liberty to avail alternative remedy under the Act of 1976. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Sanjay/- S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11123/2010 Smt. Kamla Gehlot Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 01.12.2010 HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J. Dr. Sachin Acharya, for the petitioner. ... By this petition for writ, a challenge is given to order dated 14.7.2010 passed by District Education Officer (Elementary Education), Jodhpur transferring petitioner from Govt. Girls Upper Primary School, Ratanada to Govt. Upper Primary School, Leharnagar, Mandore. The order effecting transfer is appelable under Rajasthan Civil Service (Service Matters Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1976. This petition for writ is preferred without exhausting the efficacious, statutory alternative remedy available to the petitioner. I do not find any just reason to entertain this writ petition without getting the statutory remedy exhausted first. Accordingly, the petition for writ is dismissed. The petitioner is at liberty to avail remedy under the Act of 1976. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. Sanjay/