t( i^o'5'2-/<„..„.„......, ftR.No—"'•-"~:F?—T"^"5?^":1 Piesentsd by Sh(;"-s.. d3ted......2.^..^..%! rh^<- eE SEi IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRITPETITION N0. " ' ' /2006 PETITIONER Smt. Lallta Khalkho W/o J.P. Khalkho Age about 46 years, Asstt. Teacher Govt. Primary School, Jamul No.2 Block& Distt.-Durg(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT „. .^-^ f <3\'>1- .'£.' ^>u^ \1. ^f, •r)-u^ ^u- r^: ^^ StateGovt. ofChhattisgarh Through Secretary Educational Department Raipur(C.G.) Distric Education Officer Durg (C.G.) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^titioner most humbly submit under :- ^S^U^ XI-HC-78 *11*1WI a»Wb 3%T '<ii^i<vi<<, »Tf1uii<o,Ritni'Hy ^..uf..^n7!.°±.^ 200 3TT^7T'4a<ti ('^351^ET) 3TI^T?>TR-<i<* gaiTsn^TshiiIti Roshan ?T(iiWHf?cr3n^r 11.8.2(»6:- cdunsel Ac|v. thfct oertlflcate Heard Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. Ac|v. The case of the petitioner js as per the tnstructions dated 24-12-9^ Teachers who have passed B.T.1., B| expenses after 22-10-64 are entitled Government is Annexure-P/1. The petil] own cost jn the year 1995 and a petitioner has not been given the bene|fit been granted two advance increment^ Court. Having heard learned counsel and circumstances of the case, without case, the petitioner is allowed to make | this petition raising al! her grievances| days from today and in tum, respond^nt the petitioner in the light of averments the representation also. If respondent situated persons have been granted the petitioner's case is also covered f() basis of Government's order, then to today, in acoordance with iaw. With the direotion aforesaid, th^ Parties are entitled for oertified <tii<<tci<ll'i *iwciTffte<^)'<Rit<;i< ^3rf^IT3TI^T for the petitioner. ^/. for the State on advance copy. she is working as Assistant Teacher and issued by the State of M.P. the Assistant Ed. and M.Ed. examination on their own for two advance increments and order of ioner passed the B. Ed. examination on her to that effect is Annexure-P/3. but the fit whereas, similarly situated persons have under the orders of the Tribunal and this |for the parties, having regard to the facts expressing any opinion of the merit of the ^ detailed representation along with copy of to respondent No.2 within a period of 15 No.2 is directed to examine the case of nade by the petitioner in this petition and in ).2 reaches to the conclusion that similariy benefit of tv/o ad^nce increments and >r grant of two advance increments on the orders within a period of 3 months from njo. the ppss petition stands disposed of. opy of this order. Sd?- 1.. e P.T.O.