Item No. 80, DJ/- SBCWP NO. 8854/2010 Govind Singh Chouhan Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Order dt: 21st October, 2010 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8854/2010 Govind Singh Chouhan Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF ORDER ::: 21st October, 2010 P R E S E N T HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Kuldeep Mathur, for the petitioner. --- 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the communication of adverse entry vide Annex-7 dated 17.06.2005 for the year 2003-04, however, learned counsel for the petitioner drew Court's attention towards Annex-16, copy of the complete ACR made available to him under the Right to Information Act, which shows that the superior authority i.e. Additional Chief Engineer had already over-ruled such adverse entry and found working of the petitioner was good. 3. It appears that impugned communication Annex-7 dated 17.06.2005 has been issued in ignorance of remarks of the superior authority, namely, Additional Chief Engineer. However, the petitioner does not appear to have brought into the notice of the competent authority i.e. Head of the Department/DPC this facts. Item No. 80, DJ/- SBCWP NO. 8854/2010 Govind Singh Chouhan Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Order dt: 21st October, 2010 2/2 4. Considering the submissions advanced at bar by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of as prayed by learned counsel with liberty to the petitioner file appropriate representation to the competent authority bringing to his notice this fact and said authority shall decide the representation of the petitioner, preferably within a period two months from today. 5. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. A copy of this order be sent to the respondents forthwith. (DR. VINEET KOTHARI), J. DJ/- 80