IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 1217 of 2010 Sri Sohan Lal @ Sonu ………. Applicant/petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…. Respondent Present : Sri Pankaj Miglani, Advocate (Amicus Curiae ) present for the applicant. Sri S.S. Adhikari, A.G.A. present for the State/respondent. Dated : 21st December, 2010 Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. Sri Pankaj Miglani, Advocate present for the applicant. Sri S.S. Adhikari, A.G.A. present for the State/respondent. Heard. This application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been moved by applicant/accused for challenging the order dated 10.09.2010 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge/Ist FTC, Dehradun by which his application under section 233 Cr.P.C. has been rejected. According to the applicant, when applicant was arrested the Investigating officer neither got the applicant medically examined nor sent his semen to Forensic Science Laboratory for examination as the matter pertains to section 376 of IPC. The perusal of the impugned order shows that all the witnesses have been examined. Even the statement of the applicant has been recorded. He has also availed the opportunity of adducing his evidence in defence and the matter is posted for arguments. 2 Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the application of the applicant for giving opportunity of hearing at this stage is highly belated. I do not find any merit in the application. Hence the application is dismissed. (Nirmal Yadav, J.) JKJ 20.12.2010