[[1]] IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. COMPANY APPLICATION No. 385 of 2006 IN COMPANY PETITION No. 3 of 2002. SICOM LIMITED. .. APPLICANT. VERSUS. THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, HIGH COURT, BOMBAY. ..RESPONDENT. WITH COMPANY APPLICATION No.386 of 2006. IN COMPANY PETITION No.513 of 1993. SICOM LIMITED ..APPLICANT. VERSUS. OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, ..RESPONDENT. HIGH COURT, BOMBAY. Mr. M.P. Rege, Advocate i/b. M/s.M.P.Rege & Co.for the applicant. Ms. K.V. Gautam, Ag.O.L., present. CORAM:S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. CORAM:S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. CORAM:S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 27TH JULY, 2006. 27TH JULY, 2006. 27TH JULY, 2006. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1] In the order passed on 5th May, 2006 [[2]] number of the Company Application appearing in the cause title be corrected as "Company Application No. 385 of 2006" instead of "Company Application No. 386 of 2006". 2] Application for Speaking to the Minutes, stands disposed of. [S.C. [S.C. [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J] DHARMADHIKARI,J] DHARMADHIKARI,J]