IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8675 of 2009 KHAR CHAMAR, S/O CHIRKUT CHAMAR, R/O VILLAGE- NANWA, P.S.-BHABHUA, DISTRICT-KAIMUR ………………PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR …………OPPOISTE PARTY. ----------- 2 24.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR and there is no material except statement of one Naga Bind recorded during the course of investigation after months of the occurrence. He submits that the statement of Naga Bind is also of general and omnibus nature. However, from the impugned order it appears that the petitioner is involved in 12 cases, mostly for the offences of dacoity, robbery and Arms Act including kidnapping for ransom and rape etc. Considering the antecedent of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the petitioner and the same is dismissed. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)