, , ( (/ IH 'mE HISH GOURI OF JCTDIGAIUBE A2 JABM-KTR «<E» NOAJS-^. | /2000 Steel Stiteheei-by of iBdLa L-bd» Bhilal S-teel Plaa-t^ Btiilai repieseated by Bxeeutive Biaeatoa (E'in«) ». Petit.ioner ^ Ver sas ^^^i^'^'g:^^ ^ 2, 3, Addi-bioaal Goinnd.ssioaeiE Coiroaerea.al T®t Baipai Assistaa-t Coramissio&eE QoitmaEQial Tax, Duzg. A<a<ai-bieEial Oommeaeial Taas Officee aain 'Bafasil!aa3:» Burg State sf Madfaya PzeEdesla •tlaaougli Seaeetaay Vanijiyik Kaas Vibtiag Vailabh Bbawaa», BhepaX o»e «oo Bespondeats TISION_gHDSB, ABTISX.iE, _226/ 2 23 OS~ THE _eOHSTIT@TXON ©FISBIA ±tA .-!<.•> T- XI-HC-22 'T5I 3n<)ld4, ®T!!'9<IS,'fa?ITCT3< _^:.e:.tSS:Sr.'S.3,}\^000 311^1 ^RHwaftCT ^NwiR iTFRif •?'feTzi ^T srtSgt1 sn^i Shri Ashish Shrivasta^a with Miss. Rupal Singh, counsel for the petitioner. | SIiri Gautam Bhaduri| Deputy Advocate General tbr the State. I Thls order shaU als^ dlspose of W.P.No.2521/2000, 153/2001, 155/2001 and| identical. Petitioners have filed 156/2001, as fhe niatter is these writ petitions against the order dated 08.3.2001 pass^d by fhe Additional Comniissioner in Revision chaUengkig fhe levy of entry tas @ 10% on Slow Silica Lime Stones and Hi^li SUica Lime stones and otlier questions upheld in th^ revision by the Additional Commissloner. It 1s submit|ted that on representations made by the petitioners, the Stat^ Govemiaent has agreed to settle thc dispute outside the cou^t and on such settlement it was J . . -. .-„?>. decided to reduce the rate ofl entry tax from 10%to 6% subject to the condition that petitioriers withdraw the writ petitions. Accordlngly, leamed cAunsel for the petitioners want to withdraw fhese writ petitio^s and pray that fhe matter be rcmittcd back to thc | Additional Commissioncr for reconsideration of other i^sues. The applieations for the purpose have also been fUed| Wrs ?fe74 VT "uiT*. T Ai-n^--. ~s^i ^ipnwt, 'S^OTS, f°«ni'Mi< 3^'?n 'f^iwaiii?; ^Hicii ^f^ -ey sn^i^giwafttt ^pifefft1! Twaf'S'rels> ^SWSR iT3rf:OT3)^ Shrl Bhaduri, learnedjDeputy Advocate General submits fhat if the settleuient has Uen arrived at there is no objection to the pra^'er madc by fhe pptitioners regarding withdrawal. In view of the above, tlie matter is remitted back to the Additional Coiamissioner foii such a settleinent 1s arril reconsiderationofotherissuee. If fed at between the parties, the Additional Comiuissioner s1jifl11 proceed with fhe raatter and pass the order after hearini law. The petitioners are all^wed to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh in case ^ny cause of action still sLirvives. Accordingly these writ he petitioners in accordance with jpetitions are disposed of. A photocopy of this order be placed m W.P.No. 153/2001, W. P. 155/2001 andW.P. 15^/2001. C.C, as per rules. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge '..JJi^ '''^^•^, •^i.'C.i .