IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.399 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.3123 OF 1984 Bank of India ..Plaintiff Vs. M/s. B.P. Steel Enterprises & Ors. ..Defendants None for the Plaintiffs and the Defendants CORAM: A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATE : 3rd MAY, 2010 P.C. None appeared for the plaintiffs and the defendants. It appears that the prayer in chamber summons is for to accept xerox copies of the documents listed along with the chamber summons as the secondary evidence under Section 65(a) of the Evidence Act. Mere xerox copies cannot be accepted as the secondary evidence. The plaintiffs are at liberty to modify the prayer and seek liberty to produce certified true photostate copies duly notarised before such documents can be accepted as the secondary evidence as prayed for. With these observations, the chamber summons stands dismissed. The plaintiffs are at liberty to take out fresh chamber summons. (A.P. BHANGALE, J.)