-^. ;'\ %9 ^sss '<'1...^°> i)^' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETmON No. 3667 of2005 Chhotu Ram S/o Budganwa Aged about 60 years Caste Mannewar (S.T.) Occupatiou Farmer, R/o Villaee SukhariKhurd Tah. & Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretar^' Deparbnent of Revenue D.K.S. Bhawaii, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Board ofRevenue Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. The Co|lector, District Korba (C.G.) 4. Sub Divisional OfBcer (R) Tahsil aiid District Korba(C.G.) 5. Leeladhar S/o Satroghan Singli, aged about 49 years. 6. Mangali Bai D/o Satroghan Singh, Aged aboirt 49 years. 7. Sadhin Bai D/o Satrughan Singh, Aged about 43 yeare. No. 5 to 7 are R/'o village SukhariKhurd, Tahsil md Disti-ict Korba (C.G.) WSrT PET1TION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Asnihotri. J. Present: None for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Law>'er for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on 22"° day of January, 2009) The matter is called for hearingtwice. None appears nor any representation is made on behatfoffhe petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. InView ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. Sd/- satish K. Agnihotri Judge