IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40247 of 2008 KEDAR YADAV, son of late Gasho Yadav @ Pragash Yadav, resident of village-Tartar P.S.-Ghoswari, District-Patna. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05/ 19-02-2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that Arjun Yadav was the main assailant of the deceased but he is acquitted in the case, photostat copy of the judgment has been annexed with this petition as Annexure-2. After going through the same, it is apparent that there was an observation to conclude the trail within a period of eight months. None of the witnesses turned up. Pursuant to the direction of this Court, the case was disposed of after closing the prosecution case. Thus, it appears that it was not innocence, rather observation of this Court to facilitate one of the co-accused, namely Arjun Yadav for his acquittal. There is overact on behalf of all including this petitioner, resulting into death and injuring to severals. So, I find that it is not a fit case for bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. A.H./ (Mandhata Singh, J.)