IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28597 of 2010 ABINASH KUMAR @ SHIV PUJAN SINGH son of Ranjan Singh , resident of village Naokothi, Police Station Naokothi, DistrictBegusarai … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…. Opposite Party For the Petitioner: Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the State: None ----------- 3 25.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. However, none appears on behalf of the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 452, 302, 386, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner’s prayer for bail had earlier been rejected by this Court on 08.03.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 44015 of 2009, however, liberty was granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after completion of one year of his judicial custody. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 03.06.2009 and he has completed more than one year in custody. It is further submitted that on earlier occasion one of the reasons for rejecting the prayer for bail of the petitioner was that the prayer for bail of the similarly situated co-accused, namely, Rajesh Kumar Singh 2 and Arvind Singh, was rejected by a Bench of this Court. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co- accused Rajesh Kumar Singh has subsequently been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 06.08.2010 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 15410 of 2010. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, I direct the above named petitioner, ABINASH KUMAR @ SHIV PUJAN SINGH, to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Begusarai, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 955 of 2009, arising out of Naokothi Police Station Case No. 40 of 2009 with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be his father. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation shown by him, then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)