1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 185 OF 2011 ( Swati @ Rani Ram Sawant Vs. State of Mah. PSO PS Chikhaldara Distt. Amravati) ........................................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................................................ Shri A. S. Mardikar Adv for applicant. Shri D. B. Patel APP for non applicant/State. CORAM: M. N. GILANI J. DATED: 13th JUNE, 2011. . Apprehending the arrest in Crime No. 30 of 2011 registered at Police Station Chikhaldara for the offence punishable under Section 302, 201, 211. 498-A read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, the applicant has moved this Court for directions under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code. In connection with murder of Anita, aforesaid crime has been registered. Dead body of Anita was found in Bhimkund Valley which is a place 100 kms away from the place of her residence. During postmortem examination number of injuries were found on her body. On 13.04.2011 accused no. 1 (husband of the deceased) lodged the missing report and the dead body was found on 2 30.04.2011 which was in highly decomposed condition. Investigation revealed that accused no.1 was maintaining illicit relations with the wife of his younger brother i.e. Swati @ Rani who is the applicant herein. Deceased had noticed accused no.1 (her husband) and Swati (applicant herein ) in compromising position. For this reason there used to be quarrel between the deceased and the accused no.1. On 13.04.2011 the deceased was taken to a Clinic and from there she was carried to Chikhaldara. She was done to death and was thrown in the Bhimkund valley. The Court (Coram: R. K. Deshpande) granted ad interim protection to the applicant vide order dated 27.05.2011. Since then she attended the Police Station as per the directions. Meanwhile accused Nos. 3, 4 were granted anticipatory bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and accused no.5-mother of the accused no.1 was granted same relief by this Court vide order dated 08.06.2011. The evidence collected so far point out involvement of accused no.1. There is nothing surfaced on record to point out even remotely the conspiracy between accused no. 1 and the present applicant. The genesis of the crime might be illicit relations between accused no.1 and the present applicant. For that nothing 3 incriminating can be presumed against the applicant. In this view of the matter, interim pre arrest bail granted to the applicant stands confirmed. JUDGE svk