IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7020 of 2007 HARIDWAR GOND, SON OF JAGAN GOND, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BASANTPUR, P.S. ARRAH, MUFFASIL, DISTRICT BHOJPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, PATNA DIVISION, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BHOJPUR AT ARRAH. 4. THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, BHOJPUR AT ARRAH. 5. THE ESTABLISHMENT DEPUTY COLLECTOR, BHOJPUR AT ARRAH. 6. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BHOJPUR AT ARRAH. 7. THE NAZARAT DEPUTY COLLECTOR, BHOJPUR AT ARRAH. 8. THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, BHOJPUR AT ARRAH. ----------- 02. 20.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the State. 2. Petitioner and the intervener have been serving as candidate peon in the Collectorate and attached offices at Bhojpur, Ara. Considering the service rendered by them as candidate peon, they were empanelled for appointment against Class-IV post available in the Collectorate and attached offices at Bhojpur, Ara. In the light of their position in the panel as also the vacancy position order no.61/2010-11 bearing Memo No.10 dated 6.7.2010 has been issued under the signature of the Chairman, Selection Committee cum District Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara, 2 copy whereof is contained in Annexure-9 to the supplementary affidavit. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner and the intervener that the aforesaid office order was issued as far back as on 6.7.2010 but till date the District Education Officer, Bhojpur has not issued the appointment letter. 4. Let petitioner and the intervener appear before the District Magistrate and the District Education Officer, Bhojpur who should ensure compliance of the order bearing Memo No.10 dated 6.7.2010, as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before the authorities. It is made clear that if the authorities have any difficulty in complying the order dated 6.7.2010, they must indicate reasons for non-compliance by passing another order within the time indicated above. 5. Both the writ, intervener petition(s) are, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)