IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2010 / 14TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 17355 of 2010(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.N.BABU, EMPANELLED CONDUCTOR,KSRTC, KODUNGALLOOR OPEATING CENTRE, NORTH PARAVOOR DEPOT, NORTH PARAVOOR. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN SRI.N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY IS MANAGING DIRECTOR,TRANSPORT BHAVAN,FORT,THIRUVAANTHAPURAM. 2. ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER, K.S.R.T.C.,NORTH PARAVOOR DEPOT. SHRI V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.17355/2010-T ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 4th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner claims that he is working as an Empanelled Conductor at the Kodungallur Operating Centre under the second respondent. It is pointed out that the first respondent has invited applications for the posts of Empanelled Conductors from persons who have registered under the Employment Exchange, by way of a notification. The petitioner had submitted an application to the said post and, accordingly, he was appointed. The issue that is raised by the petitioner herein is with regard to the non inclusion of his name for regularisation of certain provisional employees who have completed 8 years of qualifying service with the Corporation. The said decision has been arrived at as per the memorandum of settlemnt executed by the Corporation with the registered Trade Unions. 2. Since his name has been omitted inspite of fulfilling the requirements provided, the petitioner has filed Ext.P3 representation before the first respondent. 3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation. It is upto the first respondent to consider the claim raised by the petitioner in Ext.P3, in terms of W.P.(C). No.17355/2010 -:2:- the relevant records maintained by the Officers concerned, and an appropriate decision will be taken and reply will be furnished to the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms