Mgn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.57 OF 2009 Limboni Niketan .......Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .....Respondent Mr. Abhay Patki, for the Petitioner. Mrs. Anjali Helekar, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. G.D. Utangale, for respondent No.3. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2010 P.C. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The petitioners were running a school which was demolished pursuant to the orders passed by this Court. The petitioners thereafter approached this Court by Writ Petition No.742 of 2006 claiming rehabilitation. By order of April 7, 2006 the petitioner was directed to move the Conservator of Forests, the Competent Authority for rehabilitation. Subsequent to that the Competent Authority by order of 12th May, 2006 has held the petitioner eligible and accordingly has written communication to the Chief Executive Engineer, S.R.A. 3. The present petition by the petitioner is to contend that till date they have not been rehabilitated. 4. On behalf of the Respondents S.R.A., a rely has been filed by Y.R. Sarode, Sub Engineer of Respondent No.3. Our attention is invited to paragraphs 6 and 7 of the said affidavit. Considering the averments in para.7 which sets out that the petitioner will be accommodated in Building No.1 for which plans have been approved and the commencement certificate is issued they propose to rehabilitate the petitioner in the said building or another vacant area which will be made available for construction of the school building for the petitioner. It is also pointed out that the S.R.A., duly approved plan for two buildings and commencement certificate has been issued. Building S-2 consisting of 62 rooms is to be handed over to M.C.G.M. Another school on Building No.1 is the building in which the statement is made that the petitioners will be rehabilitated. 5. On a specific query to Counsel for S.R.A., learned Counsel on instructions from the officers who are present and considering the statement made on affidavit states that the petitioners will be accommodated in the building No.1 as soon as the building is completed. Statement made on behalf of the S.R.A., is accepted. The S.R.A., is directed as soon as the building is completed to hand over to the petitioner an area as per their entitlement. 6. Rule made absolute accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)