IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24242 of 2010 RITESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 21.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In the nature of the order dated 27.10.2009 in Cr. Misc. No. 25904 of 2009, arising out of Complaint Case No. C1/1451 of 2008 pending before the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi , there is no occasion for this Court to reconsider the prayer for anticipatory bail. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 5.5.2010 his remedy lies before the Court below itself. The observation in the latter order with regard to moving the application for regular bail before this Court are superfluous and reflective of non-appreciation of the nature of the order passed by this Court. The application is disposed with the aforesaid observation. The trial Court is obliged to act in accordance with the directions of this Court contained in the order dated 27.10.2009 in context of any regular bail application on behalf of the 2 petitioner. Let a copy of this order be communicated through FAX to the Court of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Complaint Case No. C1/1451 of 2008, at the cost of the petitioner. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)