IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32553 of 2009 1. MD.ISRILE 2. MD. SAH ALAM 3. BIBI JABI----PETITIONERS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 9.11.2009 Heard Counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing for the State. As per the complaint petition Md. Sarwar, on assurance of marriage established physical relationship with the complainant. Subsequently on account of interference of panches marriage was solemnized but family members refused to allow the complainant and her husband to enter into their house. Lastly her husband was forcibly taken away by the accused persons and made traceless with an intention to solemnize his second marriage. Offences alleged are under Sections 376, 364, 120/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner no.1 is the uncle of the complainant’s husband. Petitioner no.2 , is cousin of the husband of the complainant and petitioner no.3 is mother-in-law of the complainant. Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code has been alleged against the husband with whom subsequently the complainant got married. Counsel for the petitioners submits that no 2 offence as alleged in the complaint petition is made out against the petitioners. The complainant in order to cover up her own misdeeds has instituted a false case. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioners is allowed. Let them surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in Jokihar P.S. case No. 154 of 2007, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar