1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1752 OF 2006 Prakash Shah ... Petitioner Vs. Municipal Corpn of Gr. Mumbai and anr. ... Respondents Mr. S.A. Sawant for Petitioner. Mr. M.More, A.G.P. for R. Nos. 1, 3 to 5. Mr. R.A. Thorat for R. No. 2. Mr.G.D. Utangale for R. No. 6. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : 12TH JULY, 2006 DATE : 12TH JULY, 2006 DATE : 12TH JULY, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . In annexure II, the Petitioner’s premises is shown as residential. In para 2 of the affidavit of Mr. Pramod Salve, it is set out that the Petitioner is eligible for 225 sq. ft. and has been allotted transit accommodation. The grievance of the Petitioner is that their premises were commercial and of a larger area. The Petitioner has already preferred an appeal. It is open to the Petitioner to pursue his appeal. Respondent NO. 4 is directed to dispose of the appeal within four weeks of a copy of this order, being served on the respondents. With the above directions, petition disposed of. All contentions left open. 2 (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.)