Crl.M.No.M-27552 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-27552 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:September 21, 2010 Azam Parvej .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Gautam Dutt, Advocate and Mr.Jamshed Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.49164 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-27552 of 2010 The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.145, dated 25.4.2009, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Nuh. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully, including the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nuh, vide which application filed on behalf of the present petitioner for anticipatory bail was dismissed. Brief allegations are that complainant is Non Resident of India. He was owner of some land. However, the land was sold by impersonating the real owner and the person who impersonated him was identified by the present petitioner-accused. Hence, documents have been forged and fraud has been committed on complainant and the real owner of the land in dispute by petitioner-accused in connivance with the alleged impersonator. Crl.M.No.M-27552 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Hence, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. Rather his custodial interrogation is necessary. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Azam Parvej for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 21.9.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge