In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Criminal Misc. No.M-9755 of 2010 ..... Date of decision:14.7.2010 Om Parkash .....Petitioner v. Puran Chand and another .....Respondent .... Present: Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.S. Budhwar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. K.C. Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.2-State. ..... S.S. Saron, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in compliance to the order dated 1.4.2010, the petitioner appeared before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jagadhri on 27.4.2010 and his bail bonds and surety bonds have been accepted. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in a complaint case which has been filed by Puran Chand (respondent No.1) against the petitioner alleging commission of offences under Sections 420, 466, 468 and 120-B IPC. The complainant (respondent No.1) is to establish his case by leading evidence. Being a complaint case, the custody of the petitioner is not required for the purposes of investigation. The case is based primarily on documentary evidence. Cr. Misc. No.M-9755 of 2010 [2] According to the learned counsel for the petitioner the complaint has been lodged after 4½ years of the demarcation that was carried out in Village Isharpur, Tehsil Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar. It is alleged that the petitioner with a view to show that he has not encroached any land has made a cutting in the demarcation report dated 13.7.2009. The petitioner has his defence of the same. This aspect, however, is to be considered by the learned trial Court after evidence has been led. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 1.4.2010 is made absolute. The criminal miscellaneous petition stands disposed of. July 14, 2010. (S.S. Saron) Judge *hsp*