1 47 cas 658.09.doc k IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 658 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 152 OF 2009 Ranjana Shivaji Jagdale ..Applicant. Vs. Mahadeo Maruti Magar & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr. S.K. Shinde i/b Sagar Kasar for the applicant. Mr. A.M. Kulkarni for respondent no.2. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 08/10/2010. PC: 1 Heard learned counsel for the Parties. 2 By this civil application, the applicant has prayed for injunction restraining the respondents from disturbing and obstructing their possession in the suit land. This court on 30th July, 2009 directed the parties to maintain status-quo as on the date of the order. This order is operating till this date. 3 The appellant is original plaintiff, who filed suit for injunction simplicitor. The suit was decreed by the trial court 2 47 cas 658.09.doc vide the judgment and order dated 29.06.2005, which judgment has been reversed by the appellate court by an order dated 07.03.2009. 4 The respondent no.2 claims to be a tenant in the suit. Though he failed before the tenancy authorities in establishing his claim of tenancy, his revision application, challenging those orders, is pending before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal. Keeping that in view and considering the order of status quo passed by this court on 30th July, 2009, in my opinion, this Civil Application deserves to be disposed of with direction to the parties to maintain status quo till disposal of the Second Appeal. Order accordingly. 5 Civil Application is disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale, J.)