IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 3459 of 2008 Decided on: 30. 07. 2010 Gopal Dass …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?. No For the petitioner. : None For the respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the respondent No. 4 : None Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The petitioner is aggrieved by the office order dated 21st July, 2006, issued by respondent No. 3. Since, the petitioner has already completed his normal tenure at the present place of posting, this Court will not exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 30, 2010 (K. Attri) Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?