IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 28419 of 2008 Between: 1 Ch. Venkata Narsinga Rao S/o. Ch. Linga Rao Gudur (V), Mustabad (Mandal), Karimnagar District. 2 Gadicherla Ellavva W/o. Laxmi Narsaiah Cheppala Pally (V), Mustabad (Mandal), Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The District Collector Karimnagar Karimnagar District. 2 Chief Planning Officer Karimnagar Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the impugned order vide Proceedings No Plg.II/504/DP.07-JGL dated 03-12-2008 as constitutional and violative of Article 243 of Constitution of India r/w Schedule 11 and 12 of the Constitution of India illegal, and arbitrary and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to allot the development works to the local bodies strictly in accordance with the G.O.Ms.No. 13 Planning (VI), Department, dated 13- 06-2008. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.RAMACHANDRA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no lis to be adjudicated in this writ petition and the matter has become infructuous. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 26th June, 2009 bcj