IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 23452 of 2004 Between: B. Pocham, S/o. Balaraju, Grampanchayath, Godisiryal, Kadem Mandal, Adilabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary to the Panchayath Raj Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector (Panchayath wing), Adilabad District, Adilabad. 3 The Divisional Panchayath Officer, Nirmal, Adilabad District. 4 The Extension Officer, (PR&RD), Kaddam, Adilabad District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to Issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondent No.1 in not granting any stay suspending the order in Proc. No. 893/k4.pts/03 dated 26.10.2004 passed by the respondent No.2 against which the petitioner preferred a revision dated 10.11.2004 and not fixing any date for hearing the said Revision, is arbitrary, illegal, null and void and also violative of section 264(2) of the A.P. Panchayath Raj Act and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to dispose of the Revision of the petitioner filed on 10.11.2004 against the order in proc No. 893/K4.pts/03 dated 26.10.2004 passed by the respondent No.2 at an early date until the disposal of the Revision by the respondent No.1. For the Petitioner: MR. C. HARI PREETH, Advocate. For the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner in effect seeks a direction to the first respondent to dispose of the Revision preferred by him against the order passed by the second respondent in Proc.No.893/K4.pts/03, dated 26-10-2004 at an early date. When the writ petition came up today for admission, the learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development appearing for the respondents submits that the first respondent is going to pass orders on or before 20-12-2004 on the Revision preferred by the petitioner. In the circumstances, no orders are necessary in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ______________ N.V. RAMANA, J Date: 16-12-2004 Svv To 1 The Secretary to Panchayath Raj Department, Government of Andra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector (Panchayath wing), Adilabad District, Adilabad. 3 The Divisional Panchayath Officer, Nirmal, Adilabad District. 4 The Extension Officer, (PR&RD), Kaddam, Adilabad District. 5 Two CCs. to the Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, High Court Buildings, A.P., Hyderabad (OUT). 6 Two CD copies.