IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION (1) Company Application no.898 of 2008 in Company petition No.645 of 1988 with (2) Company Application No.1312 of 2007 and Company Application No.212 of 2008 in Company Petition No.645 of 1988 In the matter of M/s Elmot Engineering Co.Pvt.Ltd. The Premier Automobiles Ltd. ..Petitioner vs. Elmot Alternators Private Ltd. ..Applicants and Official Liquidator ..Respondent and Rathnam P.V. ..Intervener. Mr.Kirti Munshi with Mr.Ajay Fernmandes and Mre.Vaibhav Warekar i/b M/s Govind Desai and Associates for applicants. Ms.U.M.Jhaveri for petitioner. Mr.C.N.Mehta in C.A.No.898 of 2008 for applicant. Mr.S.Ramakantha, Dy.O.L.prersent. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. J. J. 3rd July 2008 3rd July 2008 3rd July 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Munshi appearing for Elmot Alternators Pvt.Ltd. After perusing the application and affidavit in support so also hearing Mr.Munshi, I am of the view that interest of justice would be subserved if the intervener Rathnam P.V. is allowed to intervene in these proceedings subject ofcourse to the right of Elmot Alternators Pvt.Ltd. to dispute the facts set out in the affidavit in support and point out that the intervener Rathnam P.V.is not the shareholder of the company in liquidation. All contentions in that behalf of both sides are kept open and without prejudice to the same the company application no.898 of 2008 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)