IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2784 of 2007 ARBIND KUMAR Versus MAGADH UNIVERSITY BODH GAYA & ORS. ----------- 16. 4.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the opposite party-University. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is receiving the current salary, but small portion of arrears on account of dispute in calculation has not been settled. Mr Jai Shankar Barnwal, learned counsel appearing for the University submits that the admissible arrear of the petitioner has been audited by the Auditors appointed by the State and the payment has been made, which is being disputed by the petitioner. Considering the submissions, however, since the order of this Court has been complied with, this contempt application need not proceed further. The same is, accordingly, disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)