Cr.MMO No. 79 of 2007 02.05.2008 Present: Mr. Baldev Singh, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Guleria, Law Officer, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Suneet Goel, vice counsel for respondents No. 2 to 4. Cr.MMO No. 79 of 2007: The present petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of proceedings pending before the learned trial Court under Sections 452,323,325,504,506 and 34 I.P.C. The petitioner is the accused person summoned by the Court on a complaint filed by respondent No. 3. The petitioner has also filed affidavit of said Husan Singh, respondent No. 2 and two other complainants Smt. Surinder Kaur and Smt. Rattani Devi, respondents No. 3 and 4. The compromise has been effected by the respondents who have filed their affidavits in support of the fact that they have compromised with the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents have also submitted that a compromise has also been effected in between the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the decision of Apex Court in B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another, (2003) 4 Supreme Court Cases 675. A perusal of the judgment shows that it was observed by the Apex Court that in case the compromise has been effected in between the parties and the petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the proceedings, Section 320 ..2… would not be a bar for exercising the powers of quashing the proceedings. Keeping in view the fact that the parties have compromised and the ends of justice will be met in case the proceedings are quashed, the petition is allowed and the proceedings pending before the learned trial Court are quashed accordingly. A copy of the order be sent to the learned trial Court for information. Record of the case, if any, be sent to the learned trial Court. In view of the final disposal of the main petition, all the pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. May 02, 2008 ( V.K. Ahuja ), J. (BSS)