1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7512/06 Kishan Devi vs. Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam & Ors. Date of order : 20/8/2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Raj Kumar Sharma for the petitioner. Ms. Ashish Sharma for the respondents. ****** This writ petition has filed by the petitioner challenging the order of transfer dated 7.9.2006. The petitioner has challenged the order of transfer on the premise that there was no administrative exigency which warranted her transfer because the place where the petitioner was earlier posted is vacant and no other person has so far been posted there. The petitioner was merely transferred at the instance of respondent no.3 as she could not fulfill his unwanted demands. Petitioner is a Class-IV employee and also a widow. Ms. Ashish Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the writ petition and submitted that transfer was made due to the administrative exigencies 2 inasmuch as the petitioner who holds a transferable post cannot insist on continuing in that post forever. It was argued that there were some complaints against the petitioner and warning was also issued to the petitioner. Having regard to the facts of the case and keeping in view the fact that the order of transfer has remained stayed since 22nd September, 2006 when the interim oder of stay was passed by this Court, while upholding the right of the respondents to transfer the petitioner, I set the petitioner at liberty to make a representation to the Chief Personnel Officer of the JVVNL raising her grievances, particularly the fact that she is a widow having small children and that the post from which she was transferred is still vacant. Such representation shall be made within a period of one month and the Chief Personnel Officer aforesaid is directed to decide the representation within a period of two months from the date such representation is submitted to him, keeping in view the conduct for the petitioner for the last two 3 years. The interim order of stay as passed by this Court on 22.9.2006 shall remain operative for this period of three months and no more and the subsequent placement of the petitioner shall abide by the final order passed by the respondents. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/