IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12846 of 2009 DILCHAND CHAUDHARY & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 21.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. Petitioners are in custody in relation to Guraru P S Case No.31 of 2008 which was instituted initially under sections 323, 341, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and later section 302 was added. According to the allegation made in the FIR a dispute within the family took place with regard to tieing of animals at a place which led to some hot exchange and assault by lathi and other implements. It is also stated that there is counter case also to the said case and all the accused persons and informant of both the cases are close relatives of each other. It is urged on behalf of the petitioners that this is not a case of pre-meditated crime and keeping the background to the case petitioners deserve to be released on bail. Learned counsel for the informant submits that although petitioners are still to face trial but there is specific allegation of assault so far these two petitioners are concerned. The Court is of the considered opinion that since it is not a case of premeditated crime and petitioners are still to have suffer trial of their indiscretion committed by them., let petitioners Dilchand Chaudhary and Ramchandra Chaudhary alias Ram Chand Chaudhary be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- each with - 2 - two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Guraru P S Case No. 31 of 2008. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)