Versus RES?0HDEI§TS a 'a HiGii COURT OF ChmTTISGARi-I AT BILASPUR PET! - l9..E-.S j; a, V 'a"ry State of Chhattisgarh and others Onier @st for H 4-2008w . Sdl~ I Dhirendra Mismail, .5 hulge « WRI'T‘ FETIT‘iGi? {C1 N‘o. i624l2008 Saajay Kumar Shukla "\ I; fen IJ'R‘T‘ ftF (iiiHA'T'TISGARH AT BiLASPiiR RIT PETH‘IQH £9} He. 1524/08 Sanjay Kumar Shukla, Sjo FTGS E’TIINER Indrajcct Shukki, agcd about 30 vears, Rjo Cjo R. Mishra, Or. No. 471, BMY Charsda, Zens—1, Distt. uurg (cu; State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secmh‘ ', D€§axtment of Highsr Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) '2. Pandit Ravishankar Shukia Universitv, Raipur (CG) through: the Ragi‘strar, Pandit 'Ravishankar Shukla Universitv. Raipur (CG) 3. The Director, Stata Educaticnal Research and Training institute Shankar Nagar, Raipur (CG) 4. The Dilector, institute of Teacher Education, Pt. Ravisharm Shukla Universitv, Raipur (CG) Present RP. Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Sh Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State, Shri Vinay Pandey,- Advocate for Pt. Ravi Shankar Shulda University: INDIA O-R D E R 7I-4-2-OD8 am w urn n nun: u unnumvunn nn'nmur‘nn u 1v1IDriRA,u n. . DD: hOh Dun} oru Counsel for the petitioner submits that identical matter bearing W.P.(C.) No. 61 i/‘2C!08 (Vishnu Prasad and others —v- State of Chhattjsgarh and others) involving the simiiar question has been allowed by order dated 9-4-2008 and simiiar orders mav be passed in this matter also. Learned counsel for the respondents do not oppose the above prayer. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed in tenns of onier passed in W.P.(C‘) No. 87l/2008 dated 9-4-2008 and it is dilected that the petitioner shall be permitted to continue his studies in the institution and they shall also be allowed to appear in B.Ed. examination for 2007-08. 6’” e"/y $IGH CG W Snn ri 2 “ w, ,