IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 17TH JULY 2009 / 26TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 20094 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- WEST COAST LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.A-964,POONKAVU,PATHIRAPPILLY.P.O, ALAPPUZHA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,(GENERAL),ALAPPUZHA. 3. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL)OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,AMBALAPPUZHA. 4. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, GOVT. SECRETARIAT,TRIVANDRUM. MR.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.20094 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 17th day of July, 2009 J U D G M E N T The prayer sought in this writ petition is to direct the 1st respondent to pass orders on the application made by the petitioner for renewal of the classification already granted to the petitioner Society. The petitioner submits that it is a Labour Contract Co- operative Society, which was accorded A -class classification as per Ext.P1. It is stated that on its expiry, an application for renewal has been made, which is now pending consideration of the 1st respondent. It is seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to expedite orders, the writ petition is filed. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, the application for renewal of the classification is pending, there is no reason why the matter should be inordinately delayed. Therefore, I direct the 1st respondent to consider the application referred to above, and pass orders thereon as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy WP(C) No.20094/2009 -2- of this writ petition. 3. The petitioner to produce a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition, before the 1st respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg