CWP(T) No. 2506/2008 (OA(D) 907/1995) alongwith CWP(T) No. 2507/2008 (OA(D)908/1995), CWP(T)2508/2008 (OA(D)909/1995), CWP(T) No. 2621/2008(OA 1552/1995), CWP(T) No. 2651/2008 (OA1677/1995) and CWP(T) No. 3144/2008 (OA719/1996). CWP(T) No. 2506/2008 (OA(D) 907/1995) 16.07.2009 Present: None for the petitioner. Mr.R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Rakesh Dogra, Advocate, for respondent No. 14. None for other respondents. CWP(T) No. 2507/2008 (OA(D)908/1995) None for the petitioner. Mr.R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Rakesh Dogra, Advocate, for respondent No. 14. None for other respondents. CWP(T)2508/2008 (OA(D)909/1995) None for the petitioner. Mr.R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Rakesh Dogra, Advocate, for respondent No. 14. None for other respondents. CWP(T) No. 2621/2008(OA 1552/1995) Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. None for other respondents. CWP(T) No. 2651/2008 (OA1677/1995) Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Rakesh Dogra, Advocate, for respondent No. 12. None for other respondents. CWP(T) No. 3144/2008 (OA719/1996). None for the petitioner. Mr.R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents. It is not disputed by the learned Senior Additional Advocate General that the facts in all these petitions are same. Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate has drawn the attention of the Court to judgment rendered by the learned Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 1764/1995 dated 30.6.2006, whereby the impugned seniority list already stands quashed and set aside. This judgment has attained finality since no writ petition has been filed in this Court. In view of this, all the writ petitions have become infructuous and are disposed of accordingly. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. July 16, 2009. Bhupender