IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.35427 OF 2008 1. RADHE SHYAM PRASAD, SON OF LATE SHRI SARYUG PRASAD 2. SMT. SNEH PRABHA DEVI, WIFE OF SHRI RADHE SHYAM PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA TOPKHANA BAZAR, POLICE STATION KOTWALI, DISTRICT MUNGER VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ******* 2 18/07/2011 Heard Counsel for the petitioners and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by the fact that the Court below has not granted further time to get certain documents marked as exhibits. It appears that this Court had passed an order regarding the marking of exhibits, in compliance of which, certain documents have been marked as exhibits, which would be apparent from the order dated 03.09.2005. The matter has been pending for the defence to put forward his case, which has not been complied for the past five years. Learned Counsel fore the petitioners insist that the documents should be marked as exhibits. It is said that they had deposited the cost for getting the documents produced before the Court, it is also submitted that the Court had delayed the matter and the Court had not taken action for getting the records from the Sub Divisional Officer. All these aspects of the matter will be 2 considered by the Court below if raised by the petitioners while placing their case. This Court is not inclined to intervene with the order impugned. This application is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )