IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS FRIDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2010 / 18TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 20529 of 2010(M) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- KUPPUSWAMY, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.DWARAISWAMY, THOTTATHIL VEETIL, VEDASANTHOOR, THATTARAPATTY.P.O, DITINAL DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT SABARIGIRI VEETIL, PUZHAVATHU MURI PERUNNA, CHANGANASSERY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.AJITH MURALI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY SUPRENDENTANENT OF POLICE, KOTTAYAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 686 001. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHANGANASSERY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 686 001. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHANGANASSERY POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 686 001. 4. SURESH, AGED 40 YEARS, SWARNADHARFA, PAZHAVEEDU, ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 688 001. 5. MURUKAN, AGED 35 YEARS, SWARNADHARFA, PAZHAVEEDU, ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 688 001. 6. NAJEEB, AGED 26 YEARS, NAJEEB MANZIL, LAYANATH MURI, ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.20529 OF 2010-M PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1.TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.415/2010 OF ALAPPUZHA SOUTH POLICE STATION. K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.20529 of 2010-M ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 9th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. The prayers in the writ petition are as follows: “i. to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondent Nos.1 and 3 to provide adequate police protection to the life and property of the petitioner and their family members from the threat of the respondent No.4 to 6 and their hirelings; ii. to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondent Nos.1 and 3 to provide adequate police protection for conducting the textile shop of the petitioner without the obstruction and threat of the respondent No.4 to 6 and his hirelings.” 2. We have already passed an interim order in this matter on 1.7.2010. Though served there is no appearance for the party respondents. We heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. We dispose of the writ petition by making the interim order absolute. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS