1 MCA-1.09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1 OF 2009 Poonam Dattatraya Doiphode .... Applicant Vs. Dattatraya Lahnu Doiphode .... Respondent Shri H.E. Palwe for the Applicant. S/Shri Vaibhav Gaikwad i/b A.M. Kulkarni for the Respondent. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JULY 23, 2010 P.C: This is an application by wife for transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No.186 of 2008 pending before the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar to the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nashik where she resides. She claims that she has already successfully fought Hindu Marriage Petition No. 86 of 2006, for restitution of conjugal rights in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar and also an appeal against that judgment before the District Judge at Ahmednagar. The learned counsel for the respondent states that the difficulty of the 2 MCA-1.09 applicant in travelling from Nashik to Ahmednagar can be taken care of by compensating her and her father for the travelling expenses. In view of this, since the applicant has not expressed any other difficulty in her application, the application is rejected. The respondent would reimburse to the applicant and her father the expenses for travelling from Nashik to Ahmednagar for every date of hearing and the learned Judge could pass appropriate order in that regard. Learned counsel for the parties state that the husband has already filed his evidence in the form of an affidavit and that the learned counsel for the applicant-wife may cross-examine the husband on any date. The learned counsel for the respondent-husband states that the husband would also endeavour to complete the cross-examination of the wife on one date, subject to convenience of the Court. The learned Judge would endeavour to dispose of the petition pending before him as early as possible. The petition is disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)