IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 9454 of 2008 Between: G. Vijaya Mohan Reddy, S/o. Raja Reddy, APSSDC Limited, Warangal, R/o. 24-3-219/II, Prakash Reddypet, Subedari (PO), Hanmakonda Mandal, Warangal District. ..... PET IT IONER AND 1 A.P. State Seeds Devepment Corporation Limited, Rep. byits Vice Chairman & Managing Director, 5-10-193, II Floor, HACA Bhavan, Opp: Public Gardens, Hyderabad. 2 Sri M. Venkateswara Rao, Deputy Collector (On Deputation to APSSDC Limited), & Enquiry Officer, A.P. State Seeds Development Corporation Limited, 5-10-193, II Floor, HACA Bhawan, Opp: Public Gardens, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT (S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to Charge Memo No. SSDC/Admn/2007/08, 5440, dated 13-12-2007 and Quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, and violation of principles of Natural Justice, and violation of Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.S.P.SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.CH.SHYAM SUNDER RAO The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.9454 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled questioning the Charge Memo dated 3.12.2007 issued by the respondents. The learned counsel for petitioner states that the petitioner has already submitted a detailed explanation to the said charge memo. Further a preliminary enquiry was conducted and it was reliably learnt that the Crop Scientist of Blackgram has given report with an opinion that the varietal admixture of Blackgram T-9 with that of similar varieties of unpolished varieties could not be found with a naked eye. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that no extraordinary grounds are made out calling for interference of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India at this stage of the proceedings. However, the respondents are directed to consider the explanation submitted by the petitioner while taking into consideration of the preliminary enquiry report dated 5.2.2007 and 20.2.2007 before proceeding further in the matter. With the above observation, the writ petition is closed. ________________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 9.9.2008 DA THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.9454 of 2008 9.9.2008