IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH MARCH 2009 / 22ND PHALGUNA 1930 RPFC.No. 98 of 2004() --------------------- MC.117/2002 of FAMILY COURT, KOZHIKODE DTD. 27/10/2003 .................... REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------------------------------- PULAYANKANDY RAJEEVAN, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. KUNHIRAMAN, MANIYOOR AMSOM DESOM, MANIYOOR ( P.O.) PAYYOLI (VIA) VADAKARA TALUK. BY ADV. MR.SANTHARAM.P RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER: ----------------------------------------------- MOLY, AGED 30 YEARS, D/O. KUNHIRAMAN, THACHOTH POYIL VEEDU, KARUVANCHERI AMSOM, MEENATH KARA DESOM, PALAYADU NADA P.O., IRINGAL (VIA), VADAKARA TALUK. BY ADV. MR.V.N.RAMESAN NAMBISAN THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss M.N.KRISHNAN, J ===================== RP(FC) No.98 OF 2004 ===================== Dated this the 13th day of March 2009 O R D E R This revision petition is preferred against the order of the Family Court, Kozhikode in M.C.No.117 of 2002. The wife is the petitioner and the court below has granted a sum of Rs.600/- as maintenance to the wife. It is against that decision, the husband has come up in revision. 2. The wife is a rheumatic patient with a partial blindness. The husband is maintaining a child who is also rheumatic besides his mother and two sisters. Though evidence attempted to be solicited to establish that the husband was having an income of Rs.20,000/-, rightly the Family Court did not accept it for want of materials. The Family Court found that being a young energetic man he will be able to make an earning of Rs.150/- to Rs.200/- per day as a coolie. It has to be remembered that the wife is incapable of doing any work and for the bare existences of a human being an amount of Rs.600/- will not be even sufficient. Therefore a physically able husband, who is capable of doing work is ordered to pay maintenance of Rs.600/- it cannot be considered as on the higher side. Therefore I RP(FC) 98/2004 -:2:- concur with the finding of the Family Court and dismiss the revision petition. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE Cdp/-