IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7396 of 2011 SUSHIL KUMAR YADAV @ SUSHIL KUMAR SUMAN & ANR . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 17.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the State and for the Zila Parishad, Supaul. The petitioners are aggrieved by the final order dated 21.2.2011/15.3.2011 in Encroachment Case No. 01 of 2010-11 passed by the Circle Officer, Triveniganj. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought to demonstrate that the order was contrary to law and also mala fide for reason of demolition done in part and in haste even before expiry of the period of limitation for filing an appeal. The appeal was filed barely days after the impugned order on 21.3.2011 registration of which was refused and simultaneously partial demolition carried out on 25.3.2011. Once the petitioner had filed a memo of appeal, the appellate authority was bound to register it and decide in accordance with law. Let the appeal of the petitioner be registered and considered in accordance with law and disposed off by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of two months from the date of 2 receipt/production of a copy of this order before the appellate authority. The appellate authority shall be bound to also decide the issue of the presentation of the memo of appeal, the date of the same, the allegation that registration was refused and simultaneously demolition carried out within that period. If the petitioners file application for interim relief before the appellate authority, it is required to be disposed off in accordance with law within a maximum period of one week from the date of receipt and/or presentation of such application for interim relief pending disposal of the appeal. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)