IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 8182 of 2008 & connected matters. Decided on: November 11, 2010. 1. CWP(T) No. 8182 of 2008. Manohar Lal Versus State of H.P. & ors. 2. CWP(T) No. 8186 of 2008. Raj Kumar Versus State of H.P. & ors. 3. CWP(T) No. 8188 of 2008. Vinod Kumar Versus State of H.P. & ors. 4. CWP(T) No. 8377 of 2008. Hari Dutt Bhardwaj Versus State of H.P. & ors. 5. CWP(T) No. 8425 of 2008. Daulat Ram Versus State of H.P. & ors. 6. CWP(T) No. 8426 of 2008. Vasu Dev Versus State of H.P. & ors. 7. CWP(T) No. 8432 of 2008. Jagdish Chand Versus State of H.P. & ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K.Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner(s): Mr. Yudhvir Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K.Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K.Verma, Dy. AG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners in these cases claim the benefit of counting of adhoc service for the purpose of increment and pension. It is submitted that the issue is covered in their favour by the decision of this Court rendered in CWP(T) No. 8601 of 2008. There will be direction to the second respondent to look into the matter, verify the facts and take appropriate action in the light also of the judgment referred to above, within a period of three months from the date of production of the copy of this judgment, by the petitioner concerned. The 2 consequential benefits, if any, to which the petitioners are found eligible shall be disbursed to them within another two months. 2. The Writ Petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. November 11, 2010. ( Justice V.K.Sharma ), (karan) Judge.