IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 29TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 RP.No. 1026 of 2010(J) ---------------------- ( AGAINST THE JUDGEMEN IN WPC.22093/2010 Dated 15/07/2010) .................... REVIEW PETITIONER: ------------------------------- N.SUGUNANANDAN, S/O.K.R.NARAYANAN, JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT, STATE MUSEUM AND ZOO, THRISSUR, RESIDING AT SOUPARNIKA, SREE NAGAR-270, PATTATHANAM PO, KOLLAM, (PRESENTLY WORKING AS JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT, DIRECTORATE OF MUSEUMS AND ZOOS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS -------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT, CULTURAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR, MUSEUMS AND ZOO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: VK ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------- Review Petition No.1026 of 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of November, 2010. O R D E R By judgment dated 15.7.2010, W.P.(C) No.22093/10 was dismissed, on the ground that on account of the disciplinary action, the authorities were justified in cancelling the probation and declaring the same reckoning the service after reinstating the petitioner. However, it is now disclosed from Annexure A order that his promotion was with retrospective effect and that if the probationary period is counted from that date, he had already completed the probation judgment was rendered without considering Annexure A order, which certainly is a reluctance while considering the case of the petitioner. In that view of the matter, the basis on which the judgment has been delivered, is factually erroneous. For that reason, this review petition stand allowed and the writ petition will be posted for admission. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge. ami/