IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15657 of 2010 1. DILIP MODI, SON OF SUKDEO MODI 2. SUKDEO MODI, SON OF LATE AYODHYA MODI 3. SHARDA DEVI, WIFE OF SUKDEO MODI 4. RINKI KUMARI @ RINKI DEVI, DAUGHTER OF SUKDEO MODI 5. RAKHI KUMARI @ RAKHI MODI, DAUGHTER OF SUKDEO MODI RESIDENT OF MOHALLA – FARAKA, KALI MANDIR, P.S. FARAKA, DISTRICT MURSHIDABAD (W.B.) ---- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. PINKI DEVI, WIFE OF DILIP MODI AT PRESENT RESIDING AT MOHALLA DUMARIA, P.S. KISHANGANJ, DISTRICT KISHANGANJ --------- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 03.09.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 8.10.2007 passed by Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj, in Complaint Case No. C701 of 2007 by which he has taken cognizance under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code on the ground that Court at Kishanganj had no territorial jurisdiction in the matter. The Opposite Party No. 2 has appeared who apprises the Court that in fact, now four witnesses after charge have been examined and have stated that part of the occurrence also took place within the jurisdiction of Kishanganj. In view of such, this Court declines to entertain the application. The application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)