1 S.B.Criminal Revision Petition No.199/1993 Shantilal & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan Date of Order :: 15th January, 2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Sandeep Mehta, for the petitioners. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Mr. Dharmendra Surana, for the complainant. .... This revision petition is preferred to assail validity, correctness and propriety of the judgment dated 12.7.1993 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhilwara affirming the conviction and sentence recorded by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhilwara vide judgment dated 25.5.1998. At the threshold it is contended by counsel for the petitioners as well as the complainant that the parties have entered into an agreement, therefore, they may be permitted to compound the offences for which the petitioners were convicted and sentenced. An application in this regard is also preferred by the complainant. The petitioners were convicted for commission of an offence under Section 326/149 IPC and that is not compoundable. In view of it, the application seeking permission to get the offence 2 compounded is rejected. However, by considering the evidence available on record and also taking into consideration the compromise arrived between the parties, I found it just and proper to modify the sentence awarded. Accordingly, this revision is allowed in part. The conviction of the petitioners as recorded by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhilwara vide his judgment dated 25.5.1998 is confirmed. However, the order of sentence is modified by substituting it for the sentence already undergone with a fine of Rs.2500/- against each petitioner. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. Kkm/ps.