^ HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISOARH. BIIASPUR W.P,(S) N0^7293 of 2007 PETITIONER RESPOWDBNTS Sanjay Siagh, S/o ShriT.G. Singh, aged about 40 ycars, Asst. Teacher, Govt. H^her Secondaiy School, Pharasgaon, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) R/o Gandhi Chawk, Pharasgaon, District Bastar (C.G.) Versus 1 State of Clihattisgarh, Through - Secretaiy, Tribal Developiuent fWeifere) Department, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.) 2 District Education Officer, Bastar, District Bastar (C.G.) 3 Secretaiy, Piaance Department of Chhatt^arh Stete, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Conunissioner, Tribal Developinent Departnieiit, Raipur (C.G.) S. Collector, Bastar, District Bastar (C.G.) 6. Secietaty, School Education Department, D.K.S. Raipur(C.G.) yiWTrvnnQ^vmi1^f^rjcLEji2^o^T»E^^syn'ruTtov! OF INDIA Appearance: Smt Meena Shastri, cozmsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Pradeep Singh, Panel Lawyer for fhe State on advance copy. ORAL ORDBR (10.12.2007) SUWL KUMAR SINHA.J Heard on adinission. Leamed counsel for fhe petitioner subinits that fhe petitioner has passed B.Ed. examination on lus own expenses, therefore, be is entitled to receive^ two advaace increments accorimg to circulars dated 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999. He also submits that iu maay identical matters, the petitions have been allowed ia terms of the order passed ia the case of y<ishu»nnt Kwfnar BheiretSwaf Vs. SSunlclptd Corporatipn, Durg and W.P.(S)No.7292/2007 - £ another f2006 00 JHPJR-CG 96?. He subimts that fhe case of the petitioner is squarely covered by fhe said judgmeat. This legal position is not disputed by the leamed counsel for the State. However, he subniits that the order inay be passed ia terms of the said judgment, but it shaU be subjected to verification regarding petitioner's such quaUfication. Accordingly, fhls writ petition M aUowed iu tenns of the order passed in case of Yashwant Kumocr Bharadwaj Vs. Murucipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to verification of the facts as to whether the petitioner had acquired B.Ed. Exaiaination Certificate on his own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 aad further whether he has been paid two advance iacreiuents or uot. The petition stauds finally disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Shyna ¥'=. •aM.»"ft.i»'.iuiE.BS^JlUn.lS.iiffi«UMKajUBuUUutB,;r3