WP(C) 5194/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI Heard Mr. RP Sarmah, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. M Goswa mi, learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of respondent No. 5. None h as appeared on behalf of the remaining respondents, though notices stand served on them. Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty given to the respondent No. 5, namely, Dep uty Commissioner, Hailakandi, to examine the grievances of the petitioners, in t he light of the guidelines (Annexure-B to the writ petition), which have been is sued by the National Highway Authority of India and the representation, dated 06 -07-2011, and, then, pass appropriate order(s) thereon, within a period of two w eeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by the respondent No. 5, n amely, Deputy Commissioner, Hailakandi. If the petitioners feel aggrieved by the decision(s), which may be taken by the respondent No. 5, namely, Deputy Commiss ioner, Hailakandi, and/or by the order(s), which may be passed by the respondent No. 5, the petitioner shall remain at liberty to take recourse to appropriate p rovisions of law. The petitioners may furnish to the respondent No. 5, namely, D eputy Commissioner, Hailakandi, a certified copy of this order along with copies of the writ petition and annexure thereto.