IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16427 of 2009 BINOD CHAUDHARY, son of Bandhu Chaudhary, Resident of village- Barun Mohanganj, P.S.-Barun, in the District of Aurangabad. ……Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar ……Opposite Party ----------- 03. 16.10.2009 The petitioner is an accused under Section 302 read with 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Besides the allegation made in the First Information Report, it has emerged that during investigation it was found that Sunil Yadav, Baban Chaudhary and Binod Chaudhary are involved in illicit trade of liquor and Santosh Bharti used to send information about their illegal activities to the authorities. In this regard, even earlier there was some kind of fight between the deceased and Sunil Yadav and his other members of the gang that is the reason why the petitioner with others surrounded Santosh Bharti and brutally assaulted him which led to his death. There are some evidences to show that the petitioner and Sunil Yadav were seen running away from the place of occurrence. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly his prayer for bail stands rejected. Shageer (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)