IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M- 6465 of 2011 Date of decision:- 17.3.2011 Ravel Singh ...Petitioner Versus The Central Bureau of Investigation and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. T.P.S. Tung, Advocate for the petitioner. RITU BAHRI J. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 10.11.2010 whereby the petitioner Ravel Singh has been summoned to face trial under Section 319 Cr.P.C. by the trial Court vide order dated 19.11.2009 has been affirmed. Mr. T.P.S. Tung, Advocate has argued that in the investigation, conducted by the CBI, Constable Ravel Singh was stated to be official driver of the vehicle, hence, CBI did not challan Ravel Singh. The evidence recorded by the Magistrate is not sufficient to proceed against the petitioner Ravel Singh for his trial. The order dated 10.11.2010 is based on the testimony of complainant Balbir Kaur corroborated by PW2 Paramjit Singh and based on the document Ex.D8/2 regarding posting of Ravel Singh at Police Station Chabal, which was not part of the evidence, collected in the investigation. The powers under Section 319 Cr.P.C. have been rightly exercised. The criminal miscellaneous petition is hereby dismissed. March 17, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Vijay Asija JUDGE