IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1931 WA.No. 307 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.36916/2008 Dated 16/02/2010 .................... APPELLANT(S): PETITIONER/ADDL. 4TH RESPONDENT --------------------------------------------- C.A.JOSE, S/O. ANTONY, CHAKYATH HOUSE, OLANAD KARA, ALANGAD VILLAGE, PARAVUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW SRI.SATHISH NINAN RESPONDENT(S):/RESOIBDEBTS/ PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 ---------------------------------------------- 1. C.A.DEVASSY @ DAVID, S/O. ANTONY, CHAKKIYATH HOUSE, OLANAD KARA,ALANGAD VILLAGE, PARAVUR TALUK. 2. THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, VARPUZHA, PIN-683517, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTIRICITY BOARD, VYDHUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.P.M.BENZIR FOR R1 SRI.JAICE JACOB SRI.G.G.MANOJ FOR R1 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ W.A.No. 307 OF 2010 ------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of February, 2010 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. We do not find any infirmity whatsoever with the order of the learned Single Judge. As noticed by the learned single Judge in the impugned order, the judgment in the writ petition was one on the basis of agreement between the parties and on the terms of that agreement, the appellant was to be given just four months time for shifting his workshop from the building belonging to the respondents. The learned Single Judge under the impugned order granted seven days time on the basis of consent from the respondents through their counsel. Before us also, the learned counsel for the respondents would stiffly oppose the request of the appellant for grant of further time for shifting the workshop. However, as persuaded by us, the learned counsel agreed that two more weeks can be granted. Accordingly, we dispose of the writ appeal at this stage itself granting to the appellant time till 22/3/2010 for vacating W.ANo.307/2010 2 the workshop in question. It is made clear that under no circumstances further extension will be granted. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM , JUDGE dpk