IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERAAD Monday, the 13th day of June, 2011 Present: Hon’ble Sri Justice N. Ravi Shankar Crl.R.C..No. 1236 of 2011 Between: Badri Mahesh …Petitioner and The State of AP …Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRL.R.C.No. 1236 of 2011 Judgment The petitioner herein is the accused in S.C.No. 77 of 2010. The point is whether the court of Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Srikakulam (trial Court) is justified in dismissing the petitioner’s application – Crl.M.P.No. 47 of 2011 in S.C. 77 of 2010 on its file for recall of PWs 6 and 10 for further cross-examination. The charge leveled against the petitioner is one punishable under section 376 (2) (f) IPC i.e., committing rape on a woman when she is under 12 years of age. The order of the trial court shows that PWs 6 and 10 were already cross examined at length and again the petitioner filed this application for their recall. The trial court in dismissing that application observed that as already the petitioner’s counsel has cross-examined both the witnesses at length and no new material is placed before the court to justify the need for recalling them and held that there is no ground for their recall. The learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to point out what are the new points on which both the above witnesses have to be cross examined and nothing is mentioned about them in the grounds of this petition also. In the circumstances there is no ground to interfere with the order, as there is no infirmity or illegality in it. 3. Accordingly this revision case is dismissed at the admission stage. _____________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J. June 13, 2011. *BVS