1 WP-618-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.618 OF 2011 M/s.Machtool Automation Pvt. Ltd. ..Petitioner Vs Gajanan Maruti Pise ..Respondent -- Mr.T.R.Yadav, for petitioner. Mr.V.H.Shekdar, for respondent. -- CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 27 th SEPTEMBER, 2011 P.C.: The learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent have tendered the consent terms dated 27 th September, 2011 duly signed by Mr.Vinayak Bhosekar, Managing Director of the petitioner and its advocate as also by the respondent and his advocate. 2] The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Mr.Vinayak Bhosekar, Managing Director of the petitioner is present 2 WP-618-11.sxw in the Court. The learned counsel for the respondent states that he has explained the consent terms to the workman who has confirmed and accepted the correctness thereof. In view of this, the consent terms are taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. 3] The learned counsel for the respondent acknowledges that he has received a demand draft no.970317 dated 15 th September, 2011 drawn State Bank of India payable at Pune in the sum of Rs.One lac. 4] After perusing the consent terms, I am satisfied that the controversy between the parties is lawfully settled in terms of the consent terms. Hence, petition is disposed in terms of the consent terms. [R.G.KETKAR, J.]