IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6814 of 2011 BACHAN RAM, SON OF RAM BILASH RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 04.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner along with several other accused were made accused in Tarari P.S. Case No. 44 of 2004 and subsequently, altogether 13 accused persons were put on trial in Sessions Trial No. 158 of 2006. It is further pointed out by him that after the full-fledged trial, all the above stated 13 accused were acquitted by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, Ara vide judgment dated 16.06.2009. It is contended by him that the charge sheet against the petitioner was submitted showing him as an absconder but, as a matter of fact, the petitioner had no knowledge about the institution of the above stated case and subsequently, the petitioner was arrested and remanded in the above stated case. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with above stated Tarari P.S. Case No. 44 of 2004. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )