IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT MONDAY, THE 7TH JANUARY 2008 / 17TH POUSHA 1929 Bail Appl..No. 28 of 2008() ---------------------------------- (CRIME NO.279/2007 OF PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION) .... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2: -------------------- BASHA, S/O. SHAIKH SAHIB, DOOR NO.17/32, MUSLIM COLONY, MADHUKARA, COIMBATORE, TAMILNADU. BY ADV. SRI.MANSOOR.B.H. RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT -------------------- THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.S.U.NAZAR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT, J. ------------------------------------------------- B.A. No. 28 OF 2007 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of January, 2008 ORDER Second application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner faces allegations for the commission of offences punishable, inter alia, under Sec.379 of the IPC. Altogether, there are two accused persons. The petitioner's earlier application for anticipatory bail was dismissed as per the order dated 11/9/07 in B.A.No.5483/07. I have adverted to the facts in detail in the said order. This order must be read in continuation of the said order. I am hence not adverting to the facts in any greater detail in this order. 2. In this second application for anticipatory bail, the petitioner is obliged to show the reasons which can justify entertainment of a later application for anticipatory bail, the earlier order having not been challenged at all. The learned B.A. No. 28 OF 2008 -: 2 :- counsel for the petitioner urges the only contention that the investigation has now proceeded much. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that though days have passed, no significant progress has been made in the investigation in the crime. The learned Public Prosecutor specifically submits that the recovery of the vehicle has not been effected so far. 3. I am not satisfied, in these circumstances, that there has been any change of circumstances that would justify this Court again considering the application for anticipatory bail. No such change of circumstances have been shown to exist which can justify the favourable consideration of this second application for anticipatory bail. 4. This bail application is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- (R. BASANT, JUDGE) Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge B.A. No. 28 OF 2008 -: 3 :-