IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-22144 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.9.2009 Manoj .. Petitioner v. State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. S. C. Chhabra, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ritu Punj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. .. Rajesh Bindal J. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, who is accused in FIR No. 514 dated 22.12.2008, registered under Sections 302/120-B/34 IPC at Police Station, Civil Lines, Sonepat. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner in the present case has been falsely implicated merely on the statement of the co- accused,which is otherwise not admissible. The petitioner cannot be implicated even with the help of Section 120-B IPC, as there was no criminal conspiracy, as alleged. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submitted that there are specific accusations made to the petitioner in the statement of the co-accused. It is a fact that the petitioner was also involved in property dealing with the parties involved in the present case. The murder was also committed on account of a dispute of property. The petitioner had actively helped the main accused in committing the crime. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the seriousness of allegations against the petitioner, I do not find this to be a fit case for grant of bail to the petitioner at this stage. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had pointed out to the main accused the presence of the deceased in the hospital and further helped him in running away from the spot in the car. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 22.9.2009 mk