IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.520 of 2010 RAYAN KUMAR SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02 06.07.2010 We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is the husband of respondent no.8, aggrieved by the actions of his father-in-law respondent no.7, whom he considers an impediment in matrimonial harmony inasmuch as respondent no.7 refuses to permit them to unite. We are satisfied that the present is not a matter strictly speaking, making out a case of habeas corpus illegal detention contrary to law. The petitioner has adequate and efficacious alternate remedy available to him under Section 97 of the Cr.P.C. We dispose off this application with the direction that, if the petitioner files any such application under the aforesaid provisions before the statutory authority, the authority is required to consider the same expeditiously in accordance with law. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.) (Jyoti Saran, J.)