( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Appeal No. 356 of 2003 State of Maharashtra vs Govindsingh Thakur and others. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr. M.P. Badar, Adv. for appellant. Mr.Anoop Parihar, APP for R-1 & 2. Mr. R.G. Joshi, Adv. for R-3/applicant. Coram: A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 26th August, 2009 According to the learned Advocate for the appellant as also the respondent No.3, it is not in dispute that the order regarding seized weapons Articles No.2 to 9, which were forfeited to the Government, in view of the impugned judgment and order, the accused had preferred an appeal before Sessions Judge, Nagpur claiming custody of the seized weapons. The ( 2 ) appeal is pending, therefore, question before this Court is only involving challenge to the acquittal. Parties shall be ready on next date for final hearing. S.O. to 14/09/2009. Judge. Khunte