IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT FRIDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2008 / 28TH POUSHA 1929 RP.No. 771 of 2007(L) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.17333/2007 Dated 12/06/2007 .................... PETITIONER: --------------------- PREMADASAN, AGED 37 YEARS, MOOPATH THODUKATTIL HOUSE, EZHUVANTHALA P.O., NELLAYA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANU RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. ICICI BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS OFFICER, MANAGER (COLLECTION), BABU SREEJITH, S/O.C.V.MUKUNDAN, AGED 29 YEARS, HAVING OFFICE AT: CHENNAI MAIN BRANCH, P.B.NO.1610, DARE HOUSE, ANNEXE 44, MOORE STREET, CHENNAI-600 001. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.S. BREEZ THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/10/07, THE COURT ON 18/1/08 PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT, J. ------------------------------------------------- R.P. No. 771 OF 2007 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of January, 2008 ORDER This application is for review of the judgment dated 12/6/07 in W.P.(c) No.17333/07 passed by this Court. That judgment was appealed against and by judgment dated 29/6/07 in W.A. No.1565/07 the said appeal was dismissed. The learned Judges of the Division Bench, however, had made the following observation in para-2 of the said judgment: “2. If the appellant desires and wishes, he is at liberty to file an appropriate review petition before the learned Single Judge for appropriate reliefs.” 2. Accordingly, this review petition has been filed. No new contention has been urged before me which has been omitted to be considered by me when the matter came up for R.P. No. 771 OF 2007 -: 2 :- consideration on the earlier occasion. This review petition was not disposed of earlier as the connected W.P.(c) No.23402/07 was also pending before this Court. The said petition is also being disposed of by a separate judgment today. 3. I need only mention that I find no error apparent on the face of the record which can persuade me to review the judgment in W.P.(c) No.17333/07. 4. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- (R. BASANT, JUDGE) Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge