-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.2025 OF 2004 NO.2025 OF 2004 NO.2025 OF 2004 Dilip N. Pathak and Ors. ..Plaintiffs V/s. Rajesh Jayantilal Muchhala & Ors. ..Defendants Mr. Om prakash Pandey i/by Pandey & Co. for Plaintiffs Mr. P.G. Sawant for Defendants CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.P. DESHPANDE, J. : A.P. DESHPANDE, J. : A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATE DATE DATE : 25TH JUNE, 2008 : 25TH JUNE, 2008 : 25TH JUNE, 2008 P.C. : . The parties to the suit have resolved the dispute by entering into a settlement. Persuant to the compromise reached between the parties, consent terms are filed on record. The plaintff No.1 is present in the Court who also holds power of attorney for the plaintiff Nos.2 and 3. 2. Similarly, the defendant No.3 is present who holds power of attorney for defendant Nos.1 and 2. The parties admit that the consent terms are explained to them and the contents thereof are true and correct. The consent terms are duly signed by the parties and the advocate on record for the parties. A joint prayer is made for disposal of the suit in consent terms. Hence, the suit stands disposed of as per the consent terms. The decree will drawn accordingly. 3. The consent terms taken on record and marked as Exh.’X’ for identification. (A.P. (A.P. (A.P. DESHPANDE,J.) DESHPANDE,J.) DESHPANDE,J.)