IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 8403 of 2010 Date of Decision: 10.5.2010 Nanha Ram ....Petitioner. Versus Managing Director, Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. R.S. Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the revised seniority list whereby his seniority has been lowered without affording an opportunity of hearing and to issue writ of mandamus directing the respondents to restore his original seniority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has sent a legal notice dated 22.12.2009 (Annexure P-3) to respondents No.1 to 3 for the same relief as claimed in this writ petition but no action has been taken thereon so far and he shall feel satisfied if a direction is issued to them to decide the same in a given time frame. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the file, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned respondent to take a decision on the legal notice (Annexure P-3) sent by the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order by passing a speaking order and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and also to respondent No.4 whose seniority has been challenged in the present writ petition. May 10, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE