IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2402 of 2011 SUDHIR KR. SUPAULIA AND ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 28.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for petitioner no.3 as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner no.3 is not named in the FIR but it is stated that sixty pieces of looted recharge coupons were recovered from his house. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner no.3 is that one co-accused, namely, Prakash, in whose confessional statement the name of the petitioner no.3 has been figured, had given his motorcycle to the petitioner no.3 for repairing and when petitioner no.3 handed over the aforesaid motorcycle to above stated co-accused, the said co-accused gave the above stated coupons to petitioner no.3 in security of the charges claimed by the petitioner no.3 for repairing of the motorcycle and the said fact has specifically been stated by the petitioner no.3 when his statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. was recorded. Petitioner no.3 does not have any criminal antecedent. Taking into consideration the above stated fact as well as this aspect of the matter that petitioner no.3 is languishing in jail custody since 06-10-2010 without having any criminal antecedent except the present case, let the petitioner no.3, namely, Mukesh Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Birpur in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No.43 of 2010. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)