410 C1 of2003 other connectedmatters 1 CWP 1 Ie INTHE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARHe DATE OF DECISION2 6e1202010 1CWP No1122 of2003 1 t J Raksha Rani eeePetitioner VERSUS 1 m r HSAMB and others e e I l 00 2eCWPNol0153 of2004 RameshChand CD etitioner I Z VERSUS t HSAMB and others J 0 3eCWPNo16182 of2009 08 Ashok Kumar r eeePetitioner e 1 n Z VERSUS Qm StateAgricultural MarketingBoard and others e e 4eCWPN016787 of2005 Surinder Kumar 1 eeePetitioner t ee C VERSUS State Agricultural MarketingBoard and others e e e 4e 1e 5CWP Noe5152of2007 4 4 br Rawat Seema 2014.04.25 14: 47 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document J 1 411 Pe CWP No1122 of2003 82other connected matters 2 Sarla Devi eeePetitioner 1 VERSUS Haryana State AgriculturalMarketingBoard and others e eeRespondents 6eCWPN05202 of2007 1 ShankuntlaDevi eeaPetitioner 1 rL VERSUS 1 0 HaryanaState AgriculturalMarketingBoard and others CO e e Respondents 1s I C5 7eCWPNoe1781 of 2008 32 Kalicharan 8nd others eeePetitioners Z 2 C VERSUS Haryana State AgriculturalMarketingBoard and others 08 e e rlO 8eCWPNoe20142of2009 Ashwani Kumar and another W2 Z Petitioners 0a 1e VERSUS HaryanaState AgriculturalMarketingBoard and others e 1 9CWP N010141 of 2009 Jai Parkash t el eeePetioner VERSUS HaryanaState AgriculturalMarketingBoard and others e4 1e e e 100CWPNo217 of2010 i I 1 Rawat Seema 2014.04.25 14: 47 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 412 l W 1 CWP N001122of2003 8cother connected matters 3 BaIwant Rai J 1 eeePetitioner VERSUS 1 14 HaryanaState AgriculturalMarketingBoard and others 1 eeeRespondents 11CWP N018076 of2009 PardeepKumar eePetitioner m Q 1 VERSUS 0 HaryanaState AgriculturalMarketingBoard and others 0 7 e e I CD 12CWP No18096 of2009 I Tara Rani 1 P eeePetitioner Z 1 n r VERSUS HaryanaState AgriculturalMarketing Board and others I 08 e e ClO 130CWP No18095 OF 2009 Radha Kishan and another W2 Z eeePetitioners 11 VERSUS Stateof Haryanaand others e 14CWP No4064 of2010 Sunil Kumar Sareen l 1 1 Petitioner 4eeew VERSUS State ofHaryana and others 6 e Respondents 1 1 1 Rawat Seema 2014.04.25 14: 47 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 413 1 r 1 CWPN001122of2003 other connectedmatters 4 CORAM 1 HONBLEMRJUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI 1 PRESENT2 MrRaviKapoorAdvocate Mraveen Batra Advocate Markan Advocate MrJagatSinghAdvocate for the MrCB Geol Advocate MrAK JangraAdvocate MrAmit SharmaAdvocate 21 for 0 0 1 PermodKohli Je 0 I Z Controversyis common to thesepetitionsPrecisely the the action of the in charging petitioners are C fee interest and penaltyfrom them for grantingpermlssionto extenSlOO I C45 over the plotsallotted to them in various developdareas ralse CO claimis madefor refundof the 111theStateof HaryanaIn some petitions m2 Z interestand already Petitionersin all thesepetitions were Il plotsby the for differentcommercialpurposesfrom timeto time Ie Inview of the nature of relief claimed it is not necessaryto advert to factsof eacandevery case However brief factualmatrix is noticedfrom 1 CWPNol122of2003 1 eemmm Market Kalka hereinafter referred to as the 1 by a general auction notice invited 4a for allotment ofplotsin the Grain Market to be byHaryana State MarketingBoard namelyKalka Mandi Besides givingthe Rawat Seema 2014.04.25 14: 47 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 414 1 1 lI6 CWPNo1122 of2003 c other connectedmatters 5 1 locationof the area various other facilities to be pr6vtded in the New Grain Market were indicated The relevant extract of the above auction notice is hereunderl 1 44 This mandi 1S being with the modern wayProper in themandiis beingmade for 1 Cadda sheds Park and Rest House pucca Latrines Cooler Water electricitysewerage 1 1 m and for their drinkingwater Work of and cattle androadshave been Facility 0 puccaplatform C3 andpost office will also be provided in the f bank I C9 mand I I 1 was to be madethrough open auctior The paymentwas to Z 5t bemadein ccordancewith thefollowingschedulel Q 3114ofthe bid amount will haveto be at the spot 1 08 Il auction pricein full can be within 1 r 4 monthfrom the date of without interest or 7 one Z the same can be ln three years in 6 91 easy instalmentsOn the balance amount i of the interest at the bank rate would be 1r 1 leviableee 13 ee The was under to construct the shop e4 1 withinone year as per thedesignof the MarketCommitteee 1 The for allotment of plotand in the 1 auction heldon 1521983 at Kalka Bid of the petitioner was and Sb 1 the was allottedplotnos47 and 48 16 x 50 for an 1 1 Rawat Seema 2014.04.25 14: 47 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 7 415 1 1 r CWPN001122of2003 8c other connectedmatters 6 1 tr Earnest money of Rs80001 was adjusted towards the amountof Rs2000 1 11 price oftheplot The balance amount ofRs40001 being75010ofthe sale was to be depositedeither within 30 daysof the receiptof the allotmentletterwithout interest or in threeinstalmentSwith ist at the 1 rateof7 VIo in thefollowingorderl No of 1 Date of 1Amount of I Interest Total Remarks 1 nsalment l instalment I4952515559 1 2553 RsS0001 Rs501 Rs8150 2tld 21 25183 Rs0001 Rs6001 Rs86001 n L 1212 2211e e 4 Rs8300 l 3rd 25AS4 RsS0001 iRs300 1 15 L2232 L 1 0 0 from the interest leviable on paymentby instalments the 1 1 IC allotment letter also containeda covenant for impositionof penaltyfor paymentClause 6 relatingto imposition of penalty is Z 1 hereunder Q For l default 5Io 1 1 I For 2 default 7 WIo 08 For defaulter 10 oo It is that of the allotted plotswas not giventill mm Z claims to have made a requestfor handing over the 2001 The t vid6 letter dated 172001 P49 The petitioner was l l askedtodepositthe extension fee beforetaking vide letter dated 62001 p89 It was also indicatedthat the petitioner haSfailed to construct placed on recordsome letterswhereby theshopThe 1 1 e for deliveryof Executive Offlcerecumw 1 requestwas made 1 J Market Committeevide its lettersdated157720026Annexures P 14 and P51 asked the petitioner to depositextension feeof Rsl521001 r 9 for eachplotbeforeexteension for constructionof the shopis Tlie however for waivingoff the extension fee vide Ietter 1 lt L Rawat Seema 2014.04.25 14: 47 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 14 416 436 ev J CWPN001122of2003 other connected matters 7 1 dated31000 P169 In the year 2000 HaryanaGonment framedRules HaryanaState MarketingBoard OSale 1 of Immovable Rules 2000 6hereinaerreferredto as the 2000 Rule Rule 40fthe aforesaidRule relatestosaleby allotment and sub rule 1 1 5 the iriode for makingpaymentThe mode of is as underl In XXX XXX XXX xxx 1 balanceseventy ve percentofthe priceof plot r either be without interest within thirty 1 0 0 aysfrom the date of issue of allotment letter or in slx 1 I J 4 instalmentswith fifteen percentinterest or at 9 I such rate as may be the Board Z timeThe first suchinstalm6iltshallfall due r from time to after six months from the date of allotment letter 1 I interest on instalmentsshall accrue from the O8 date ofoffer ofpossession 13 OO Rule further deals with the which Rule 50f the wa Z readsas under Om 1 5The of the plot shall be offered to the 7 1 allotteebythe Executive Market Committeewithinthirtydaysfrom the date of issue of letter If minimum basic facility1e roads Ce 1 water electriflcationare existingand if the id Il basic arenot existingthen afterproviding the saidbasic facilities e 1 J r Rawat Seema 2014.04.25 14: 47 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 417 V 1 1 1 42 4 CWP No122 of2003 8cother connectedmatters Sub Rule of Rule and Rule 50f the 2000 Rule was amended videnotiflcation dated52002 as underl 1e andin sub rule 651the words and signs In rule 4 However interest Oll shall accrue from the dateofoffer shall be addedat the end 1 In Rule5 afler the words allotment letter the words 1 1 letters andsigns if minimum basic facilities ie rods 1 1 sewerage and electrificationare existing r andif the saidbasic facilities are not extstingthen after 0 1 e 0 providingthesaid basic facilities shall be added at the CD end 35 Ie The placedon record certificatedated712004 Z to that the constructionwas on 302003 64nnexure P r Another communicationdated 2612009 has been filed as Annexure 1 I whichindicatesthat water supplyin grainmarket has started since Pe31 1 08 f11 2612007 The has placedon record to establish thenecessary amenities in the area have not even till 7 that Z 2009 tl To thecontrary the in their replyhave pleaded thatthe I e basic such as streets electricitywater supplyroadsand office buildingetc have been in the Grain Market It is lrther t statedthat secondauctionof plot the same market on was conductedin 1 eme 30111990and 24 ut of 25 plotswere sold It is accordingly pleadedthat 1 1 thisestablishes of certain facilities even in the year 1990 It is further the case of the that the petitioner Was not intefeStedin constructionof theshops That is whythepetitioner w8itedfor 20 yearsto 1 Rawat Seema 2014.04.25 14: 47 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 418 T Scother connectedmatters 9 CWP It is also statedthat the petitionerseems to have ralse the plotfor reesale also statedthat the did 1 initialpayment of earnest money and it was notpay the instalmentsafter againstPlot April1989 that a sum of Rs325001 was only111 plotNoA8 A notice dated 951988 was NoA7 and Rs300001 against 1 served upon the to start and the constructionand andthus the pleathat 1 this the did not start lr 1 not handedover tillAugust 2001 is not well founded possessiOO was C made by the petitionerit has been Givingdetails of the 0 0 thatthe balance amount of priceof the plot was paidby the mentioned C5 to 21987 for Plot NoA7 and between 1 between 0r 2421989 for Plot N0A8 have alsopleaded that 1821986 to Z in the year 1984 but she did not possessionwas offeredto the 9 0 take have relied upon the policydecision dated tr I 291998 whereby was takento chargeextension fee iO all cases 1 08 1 periodfor constructionofshopslapsed on 161987 where two C Durinthe of the petitionandin view of the conflicting WW Z availabilityof facilities this Court vide its 1 standsof the parties 1 0 aLocal Commission to inspectthe Site in orderdated182003 1 I Mandi The Commission after spotinspectil submittedhis report J dated292003 TheCommission thatthe of the area in lS very poor andvery few shopshave be6nconstructedThe t m badcondition Electric polIs 1 roadshave beenpartly constructedand are ln 1 havebeen installedbutthe electricity is availableonlyon 4t is further mentionedthat thOUh water tank was constructedhowevesthereis 50 no system of water The seweragesysteminstalledis not working 1 1 n t Rawat Seema 2014.04.25 14: 47 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document t 1 I l 419 i 7lp r 9Wt CWP N001122of2003 8 other connected matters 10 1 The area is beingused for parkingof busesand other vehicles From the placedon record it also appears that there are very few 1 l constructed Some constructions are incomplete2oads 1 havenot beenproperlyconstructedand even where theres road it isnot rnetalledThere are busheshere and there Electric pollsare visible The land is uneven Trucksbusesand cars areparked in a manner on It vanous placesSome of these were takenin November 2009 1 with a d dated camera 0 The replyof the also does not establish that all the 0 facilities are in nor any details of facilities provided are givenIt I 1 canbe safelyand inferredfromthe above mentionedfactsthat Z the facilities havenot been provided as per the general auction notice issued Z as far back as in theyear 1984 Thoughthe hae pleadedthat m 1 0 wasofferedin the year 1987 however thereis no sucllrecord to possesslon 1 I their contention Both the sides have relied upon vanous 1 08 C0 of this Court and of the Honble ApexCourt It may beusefulto emo noticesome of thejudgments relied upon bytheparties 1 Z A DivisionBench of this Court in the case of PankajSharma and tl othersvse StateofHaryana and others 200331PLR 790 while relying 1 1 upon earlier Division Bench judgment of this Court titled as Mls Makhan Lal DalipSingh etce Ve HSAeMlCWP Noe4241 of 1992 decided on e 56l9931held as underla 1 1 41n view of the aforesaiddiscussionwe allow this writ 1 petitionand direct the to providewater supplyand sewerage facilities and other facllitiesas 1 rnentionedin the sanctioned buildingplansto all the J Rawat Seema 2014.04.25 14: 47 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document l 420 1 34sr e of2003 other connectedmatters 11 CWP plotholders in the Vew Grain MarketNaeneolaDistrict 1 Ambala within a periodof one year It is furtherdirected thatthe would not chargeinterest and penal I l interestfrom the till the water and sewerage facilitiesare to them inhe New Grain Market It isalso that the petitionerswill raise construction on the allotted plotsas 1 P 1 designwithin thedateof Q of thewaterand seweragefacilities in the New 0 0 the meanwhile the rain Market However 111 I C5 will continue to pay instalmentsofthe pl Io fixed without interest The clause of interest Z after facilities of water 5 would come into operation 7 supplyand sewerageare provided to lhd pelittoners lll thenew Grain Market If the commit any default paymentof instalments in the 111 ClO manner theywill be liable to pay interest on Sm3 Z the said default as provided in the allotment letter Lle Whatever have fallen due till today the shallpay the same to the withln a 1 7 period of two monthsIf any new defaultin thepayment eeWW the would be of instalmentsis 1 1 liableto pay interestalso 33 Division Bench in the case of Mls Fateh Sinh Jitender J Kumar vs State of Haryana and others 2000 31PLR also considred theearlier Division Bench judgment in the case of Mls Makhan 1 1 Rawat Seema 2014.04.25 14: 47 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 04 1 421 Le 1 1 IP of2003 other connectedmatters 12 CWP Lal DalipSingh etco ve HeSeAMBe supraland other judgment in th Administration 1999 caseof SukhpalSinghKang Ve 1 PLJ 1 J 11 The Annexures P6 and P7 relied upon by Shri Hoodaio not in any manner supportthecase set up 1 A careful readingofthe order 111 by the petitioner 1 Lal DalipSinh andothersv HaryanaStateand 1 shows that petitioners Mls Makhan Lal Ir others frwardwith thepleathat it could 0 DalipSinghhad come 0 constructiondue to lack of water and sewerage r not 1 IC9 connections andalso because the electric wlres were I plot The ccunsel for the 41 passlngover the 1 Z seems to have on a e 1 for the petitioner to 0 realisationthat it was I because of the existenceof electric ralse 08 wires over the plotagreed to the of condition l 10 1 thatinterest shall not be charged on the by the court Z of instalmentsThe order passedin CWP tl Nol0948of 1993 is but a reiterationof the MlsMakhan Lal DalipSinghscase direction given 111 1 1 6supralThe petitionerln our consideredview cannot take of those ordersbecause as per his own mW 1 1 showingtheconstructionhas been and and telephone have been made 1 1 availableto it 149 A ofthis Court in thecase of Vinod Mittal and others 1 Rawat Seema 2014.04.25 14: 47 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 422 C 1 1 e 1 1 3 4pv 1 CWPNo1122 of2003 8 other connectedmatters 13 1 1 1 vs State of Orse 200t41RCR Civill 528 6onsidering 1 1 issue in this context and various regulations of HUDA held as 1 f underl I Ill t 161 On a combined readingof the revant Il 1 of the A Act and the Regulations it that the basic amenities can be said to have been when the metaledroads l water sewerage and electriflcation1S 1 and madeavailableto the allottees The 1 wider which includes 1 amenity is a 1 activitieslike thetourist spots open space ParkS and play fields etc Thoughthe expression work has not been defined under 6 however for 4 the HUDA Act or the 0 the limitedpurpose of enablingan allottee to 0 utilizethe allotted site it would incIude the basic Y 10 I atnenitiesonlyand not the amenitieswhich are to 1 C5 be for the entire townshipand neednot Z be to one urban area only The are thus under a legal 1 obligationto the basic amenities and 5 Z the works before the 2 is offered 1 r 117Siinilarly the liability of an allottee to pay I lnterest on the balance allotment prlceshall accrue 1n 08 from thedateof offer of only which lIl 1 of turn can be offered only on I j r Norks It means that unlessthe works consisting of basic 7 amenities the o Z are 1 0 authoritiescannot charge interestfrom the allottee L The contentionraised on behalfof the r that the of Nork n L basic amenitiesis not a 1 for charginginterestfrom the aliotteeis thus totallymisplacedand merits In view of the above referred provisions imposing obligations upon the ae the laic down by the Honbl2 Supreme Court in a recent decision in UeTe Chandigarh Administration v Amarjeet Singh8 Ors 200911SCC 660 also do not come to therescue of the The HUDA is a 1 authorityconstituted to act as an extendedhand of the welfare State It has toact a strictlylIl accordancewith its own Sincethe local commissionerhas found as a matter of fact that the works comprising the I Rawat Seema 2014.04.25 14: 47 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 9 423 1 1 W e 3 ofe2003Eeother connectedmatters 14 CWP 1 basic amenitles were in June 1992 1 haveno hesitation in holdingthat the petitioners liabletopayinterestwith effect from 1 61992 are onwardsand not priorthereto 55 1 LearnedSingleJudge111 case of Pawan Kumar vs State of 1 Haryana and another CWP of 2008 decidedon 125009 while ofthe allotteeof the Market Committeeobservedas the rights under1 In this view ofthe matter therecan be no escapebut to 1 1 Q hold that thepetitioner defaultedin paymes of Ie 0 due installmentsas perthe agreedSchedule the 0 I have held it liable to pay penaland C5 1 conditions and no directionfor the refund thereof of the Z 1 canbe issued r Thewritpetition is of accordlglyl AnotherSingleBenchofthis Court in a bunch ofwrit petitions titled 08 r C andothers vse HaryanaState Marketing asBir SinghNain 1 a othersCWPNoe12018of 2008 and Z BoardHaryanaPanchkula and Om connectedmatters decidedon 261120091 observedas underl standof the Board that basic amenitieswere The at the time of allotment is by the 1 allotteesUnder the writ petitionthis Court will not 1 1 this issue Since the matter has alreadybeen 1 decidedby a SingleJudgeof this Court relyingupon in Mls Investments Case lpra9 ae9 haverightlypaidthepenalinterest herefore e are not entitledto any refund for making 1 Rawat Seema 2014.04.25 14: 47 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 424 1 27 Ir CWP Noe1122of2003 0 other connected matters 15 1 payment ofextension fee and penalinterest J While considering similar 1SSue Honble SupremeCourt in the case of UT ChandigarhAdministration 8 Anre Vse Amrjeet SinghSc Orse JT 2009 41 SC 39 relied upon its earlier judgmentin the case of MunicipalCorporationChandigarhve ShantikunjInvestments Pvte I l Ltd 2006 41SCC 109 and various other and observed as underl 1 1 183 As per the terms of allotment upon of the 25 per cent will be 0 handed over and rest of the 75 per cent of the 7 0 leasedamount to bepaidi a staggered manner ie 111three annual equatedinstallments alongwith I interest at the rate of 10per cent If someone wants CD to depositthe whole of the 75 per cent of the amount he can do so In that ase he will not be 1 required to pay any lnterest But if a partywants to Z makepaymentwithin a periodof threyearsthen he is under the obligationto pay10 per cent intereston the amount of installment This is the 1e obligation the part of the allottee as per the on conditionof lease and he cannot get out ofit by I sayingthat the basic amenities have not been t 06 provided for enjoyingthe allotted land therefore QO he is not liable to pay the interest 1 m3 We askedthe leamed counsel for the parties to tell Z US whichis the ofthe lessorin the lease 1 deedwhich saysthat theywill not chargeinterest J CL on theinstallmentsbefore providing the amenities Thereis neither any condition in the lease nor any obligationunder the auCtlO If the partieshave giventheir bids their eyes1Nide open they have to blame themselves It cannot be enforced by any mandamus as there is no obligation contained in the lease deed or inthe auctione eee notice It 1 I Therefore it is evident that a lesseelsuccess811 bidder cannot seek reschulingof the instalments of premium or of accrual of the interestpayable as per rules 33 1 sse9 5e 20We are not in a positionto accept the submissionof ShriBhandarethat equitywouId not 1 demandcharging of interest thoughtheplots even Rawat Seema 2014.04.25 14: 47 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 425 1 1 14 1 i 1 1 1 CWP N0e1122of2003 8 other connected matters 16 yetto be fully developedWhen partiesenter are 1 lnto contract theyare to abide by the terms and J conditionsof the same unless the same be inequitablen the presentcase qlestionof equity does not reallyarise inasmuchas the condition relatingtO interest 1S foundedon a statutoryrule viresofwhich hasnot been challenged Il 24 But the facts of this case e completely 1 differentThe auction sale was in December1996 1 TheNational Commissionhas recorded a flnding thatalmost all the facilitieslamenitieshad provided 111the year 1999 that is within about two years Thereforethe observationsOfthis court in para38 1 of will have no to these 1 as theywere made in the context cases 0 of a writ whereas we are concerned 0 with a underConsumer Protection 17 Act Wemay also refer to anotheraspect Section 7 J l of the Act empowersthe CentralGovemment to C5 levy such fees and taxes as it may consider I l I necessary shall be in add4ion to any fee or 1 1 t taxfor the time beingleviable under any otherlawl 1 1 Z in respectof any Slte or building on the transferee or the occupierthereof for the purpose of providingmaintaining or continull any amenlty t C at This provisionclearlydemonstrates r that the providingamenitiesis not linked to 1 I auctlon of plotson leasebasis and the 1 C45 paidisnot for providing any amenity The Central Governmentis requiredto lorovide amenlties by ao 1 levying fees and taxes in respectof siteslplots on 1 e the transfereesloccupiers thereof Therefore it 1S Z doubt811 whether any reduction in interestcould bemade on the ground I tl of of amenities Be that as it may 1 As we have alreadyheld that para 38 will not applywe do not propose examinethat aspectany furtherin thesecases 95 rr 4 Even though Division Bench of this Court in the case of Pankaj deee Sharma and others supralruled that liabilityto pay intereStand penalty 1 1 accrues on of facilities However a Division Bench in the case of Mls Fateh SinghJitender Kumar lpral had a clifferentopinion the liabilityto pay interestand penalilterest in 1 the event of defalilt The controvrsy has been now settled at rest by 1Rawat Seema 2014.04.25 14: 47 Scanned True Copy of Original