- 1 - rng IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.131 OF 2009 in FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.83 OF 2009 Smt Bhavana Sudhir Pashankar ... Applicant vs Sudhir Dattatraya Pashankar ..Respondent .. Ms.Tanmaii Gadre i.b Mr.N.P.Deshpande for Applicant Mr.Manoj Patil i.b Mr.A.B.Vagyanhi for Respondent. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR AND R.V.MORE,JJ DATED: September,16, 2009 P.C.: 1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Since it is not in dispute that when the matter was pending in the Family Court, Pune the respondent-husband was paying Rs.1500/- p.m. to the applicant-wife and considering the fact that son of the respondent is studying in 12th standard, it would be just and proper to direct the respondent-husband to pay Rs.2000/- p.m. to the minor son Tejas and Rs.1000/- to the applicant-wife so in all Rs.3000/- be paid to the applicant-wife during the pendency of the Family court appeal. The order of the trial Court granting decree of divorce is stayed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the - 2 - case, hearing of the appeal is expedited. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. R.V.More, J P.B.Majmudar, J - 3 -