IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34057 of 2009 1. RAJ KISHORE RAM @ RAM KISHORE RAM SON OF MATHURA RAM. 2. GEETA DEVI WIDOW OF LATE MATHURA RAM. BOTH ARE REDIDENTS OF VILLAGE TAHDIYA, P.S. BARHIYA, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 27.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The offence alleged is under sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the bail application on behalf of Petitioner no. 1, Raj Kishore Ram @ Ram Kishore Ram, as the petitioner is desirous to surrender in the court below. Accordingly, the application against petitioner no. 1, Raj Kishore Ram @ Ram Kishore Ram is rejected. It is submitted that petitioner no.2, Geeta Devi has been implicated in this case vaguely. As a matter of fact, this is a dispute between husband and wife and this petitioner cannot be held responsible. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, Geeta Devi, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 2 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M. Sheikhpura in connection with Complaint Case No. 294 – C of 2006 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)