IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19374 of 2011 Gautam Paswan Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 24.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in not named in the F.I.R. and has been falsely implicated in this case by the informant for some oblique purpose and the petitioner is languishing in jail since 01.01.2011. It appears from F.I.R. that regarding the occurrence of dacoity in the house of informant about looting the two Nokia Mobile sets ornaments & cash Rs. 5000/- on 01.01.2011 about 0.30 AM FI.R. is lodged on 01.01.2011 at about 8.30 AM by the informant Mohan Kumar against unknown with contention that villagers have, surrendered the village to apprehend the dacoits. Paragraph 7 of the case diary shows that petitioner was apprehended with looted mobile nearby the house of informant from paddy straw. Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances I am not inclined to allow the prayer of bail at present of this petitioner. Accordingly, bail petition is hereby rejected. Kamlesh (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)