BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twelfth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12039 of 2011 PARIMALA SELVI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NANGUNERI POLICE STATION, THIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.272 OF 2011. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.KANNAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No. 2 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b),427 and 506(1)I.P.C. and Section 3(1) of T.N.P.P.D.L Act, in Crime No.272 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner arrayed as A2 and the alleged occurrence took place on 17.06.2011 and a false case has been registered against them under Sections 294(b),427 and 506(1)I.P.C. and Section 3(1) of T.N.P.P.D.L Act, and hence, she prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submits that due to previous enmity the petitioner and another criminally trespassed into the de-facto complainant's house and cut the Coconut plants, Neem Plants and damaged the grill gate doors and other items and caused damage worth about Rs.20,000/- and also threatened the de-facto complainant and the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of this application. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, the alleged occurrence took place on 17.06.2011 in the de-facto complainant's house and she caused damage worth about Rs.20,000/-. Even though the case has been registered on 17.06.2011 and even though she was not arrested and she neither interfered with the investigation nor absconding from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner on condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the credit of Crime No.272 of 2011 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, and on receipt of the same, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of her arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri and on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 5. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. Sd/- 12/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATEM, NANGUNERI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTATE, TIRUNELVELI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NANGUNERI POLICE STATION, THIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. V.KANNAN Advocate SR.No.31158 ssk/14.09.2011 /6c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12039 of 2011 Date :12/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/