Respondente HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BtLASPUR Writ Pefition (Cr.l No. 1250 of2007r Petitioners 1. Thandaram Son <rf Shri Etwar Sai, aged about 30 years 2. Teejram, S/o Shri Etwar Sai Aged about 25 years 3. Ram Bai, W/o Late Shri Mohit Ram, agedabout22years All resident of villate Nartalo, Thana Dharamjaygarh, Dist. Raigarh, Chhatti^arh Versus 1. StateofChhatti^iarhThroughState House Officer Police Station Dharamjaygarh Dist. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 2. Shobhit Ram, S/o Sadhram Rathia, aged about 35 years 3. Komal Prasad, S/o Bedram Rathia. aged about 23 years 4. Heturam, S/o Mudrakl Ram Rathla, aged about 22 years 5. Bhuneshwar, S/o Muktiram Rathia, aged about 21 years 6. Yuvraj, S/o Basantram Rathia, aged about21 years 7. Rajesh, S/o Roop Singh Rathia, aged about 20 years 8. Bodhram, S/o Lohra, aged about 20 years 9. Sindhu Ram, S/o Lohra, aged 23 yeare 10. Sonadas, S/o Unknosw, adult 11. Prem Singh, S/o unknswn, adult 12. Bhoklu Ram, unknown, adutt All resident ofvillage Narkato, Thana Dharamjaygarh, Dist.Raigarti, Chhattsgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ART1CLE 227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION QEJNDIA > SB: Hon'bleJusticeShriSatSshK.Agnihotri ¥-- Present: Mr. Anand Venna, Advocate for the petttioners. ORDER (Passed on this 18°*dayofApril, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the prtitioners submite that the petitionere want to pursus the matter before the Judicial Magistrate Firet Class, Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh in the pending case for ••»^-,. ^. r II B/- proper and eiyeditious invesSgafion. He seete permission of this Court to withdraw this peUtion with the above stated liberty. 2. It is ordered accordingly. 3. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as w^idrawn yMh th® above stated liberty. Noorderastocosts. _-__ - ' - Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge f'