IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15737 of 2009 GUDDU KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 22.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire allegation is false and frivolous as his wife had died due to acute diarrhoea which would be apparent from the prescription of the doctor (annexure-2). Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the informant who happens to the brother of the victim lady has filed a petition of compromise in the learned court below stating that the deceased had died due to ailment and F.I.R. has been lodged on the basis of wrong information given by the villagers and that the petitioner has not committed any offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner also avers that he is in custody since January, 2009. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. Let the petitioner, namely Guddu Kumar shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Patepur P.S. Case No. 11 of 2008. harish/ ( S.N.Hussain, J)