$€ HEGH C§URT aF CHHATTSS§ARH : BILASPUR WRET PETIT!ON i51 MG 64%0 §F 2908 $E?!T!§NER RL. Rathare, ageai 44 year$, son of Manik Lal Rathore, Upper Division Teacher, Govi. Midd!e Schaci, Junwani, Bhilai, District Burg {CG} Versus 1. State Govemment of Chhatti$garh through ihe Secretary, School Educaiior; Department, D.K.S. Bhawaii, Raipur (CG). 2. Disi‘rict Eciumai‘ion Offmer, Burg, Dist. Burg {CG), §§$PGNEENTS (Wrii peiition under Amcie 226 of the $onstitution 9f india) $ingle Bench : Hon’ble Shri $ati$h K. &gaihotri, J. Present :a Shfi So‘mkaai Verma‘ counsel for the iaetitioaer. Sai‘xri YB. Thakur, Dy. Aa'vocate General for ihe 5tate. \\ ORAL ORDER (Passed an this 25m day of February, 2G09) > Shn Y.S. Thakur, iearned By. An'vocate General appearing far the 8tate wbmits t‘nat the impugned Orn’er {laten' Bt-tQ-QOQS (Annexure—P/t)‘ ha5 aémittediy neen passed Without affording onportunity 6f hearing to the petitioner. Shri Thakur runner whmits that the State shalt recai! the order anct the State may be granted titaerty to take apprepriate stees after issuing Show cause netice and affording an apportunity of hearing to the petitienet, in accetdance with law. tn View of the above categoricei statement made by the learned Dy. Advocate General, according to learned counset for the petitioner nothing survives in thie petition for adjudication. iiberty. Accordingty. the petition etands disposed or with the aforesaid Consequentiy. interim order passed eariier stands diseharged and the pending applications, if any, aiso stand dispesed of. / Sdl— Saesh K. Agnihm‘ Judge Gowri ’ a)v.