IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 16TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 25TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 28667 of 2010(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- VENUGOPAL.M.K,GED 41 YEARS, S/O.LATE MADHAVANUNNI NAIR,RESIDING AT MADATHIL VEEDU,POST KANNIPARAMBU,VIA MAVOOR,KOZHIKODE, PIN-673661. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.JOSE SMT.TESSY JOSE RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695 001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR,VYTHIRI TALUK,POST VYTHIRI WAYANAD DISTRICT,PIN-673 576. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,KUNNATHU EDAVAKA VILLLAGE,VYTHIRI.P.O,WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN-673576. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 28667 OF 2010 (G) ===================== Dated this the 16th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T The complaint of the petitioner is regarding the alleged refusal of the 2nd respondent in accepting the land tax in respect of the property belonging to the petitioner. It is seen that complaining of the above, petitioner has filed Ext.P1 representation before the 2nd respondent. According to the petitioner, no action has been taken on the representation. 2. Having regard to the above, I direct the 2nd respondent to pass orders on Ext.P1. This shall be done within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the claim and it is entirely for the 2nd respondent to deal with the same. 3. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp