:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.166 OF 2006 ARBITRATION PETITION NO.166 OF 2006 ARBITRATION PETITION NO.166 OF 2006 Romi Kumar Wadhwa ..Petitioner. Vs. M/s.Shriram Security Services and Detective Agencies P. Ltd. ..Respondents. Mr.A.M.Saraogi with Mr.S.K.Chaurasia for the Petitioners. Mr.Rahul Chitnis with Suchitra Kamble for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 19TH JUNE, 2006 DATED : 19TH JUNE, 2006 DATED : 19TH JUNE, 2006 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : By consent, the petition is admitted and heard finally. 2. The Petitioner seeks an injunction restraining the Respondents from acting upon or implementing a notice of termination dated 7.3.2006. 3. The termination notice was served by the Respondents upon the Petitioner in respect of franchise agreements dated 11.3.2003, 13.11.2003 and 29.9.2004. There is no question of restoring the possession of any premises from which the franchise :2: agreement was being carried on. The premises belong to third partie, the educational institutions. Separate franchise agreements have also been entered into with other third parties who are in possession of the said premises. 4. There is nothing else to protect at the interim stage. If the Petitioner continues to act under the said franchise agreement, he does so at his risk. It is clarified that in these circumstances, I have not dealt with the merits of the contentions between the parties. 5. Needless to add, all contentions between the parties including as to whether the Petitioner is entitled to specific performance of the agreement before the learned Arbitrators, are kept open. Petition is disposed of accordingly. All parties to act on an ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by the Personal Assistant.