IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 7TH JANUARY 2011 / 17TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 4429 of 2009(B) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. MALABAR CLAY PRODUCTS, 1/2-B, CHEMBRA, THIRUVEGAPPURA P.O., OTTAPPALAM TALUK, PALAGHAT DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR M.A.ASHRAF, AGED 39, S/O.ADIMAKKUTTY, MANATHATTU HOUSE, MALIKAMPEEDIKA, ALANGADU P.O., ERNAKULAM. 2. M.A.ASHRAF, AGED 39, S/O.ADIMAKKUTTY, PROPRIETOR, MALABAR CLAY PRODUCTS, THIRUVEGAPPURA P.O., OTTAPPALAM TALUK, PALAGHAT DISTRICT, HAVING PERMANENT ADDRESS AT MANATHATTU HOUSE, MALIKAMPEEDIKA, ALANGADU P.O., ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS. SRI.MOHAMED AYUB SRI.V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR) SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE KIZHAKKAMBALAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PATTAMBI POLICE STATION, PATTAMBI. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PATTAMBI. 4. MR.K.MUSTHAFA ALIAS MUTHU, AGED ABOUT 40 S/O.MOHAMMED ALIAS KUNJIMAN HAJI, KINANGATTIL HOUSE, CHEMBRA, PALLIPPURAM, THIRUVEGAPPURA 679304 5. MR.SAINUDHEEN ALIAS SIDDI, AGED ABOUT 45 S/O.MOHAMMED ALIAS KUNJIMAN HAJI, KINANGATTIL HOUSE, CHEMBRA, PALLIPPURAM, THIRUVEGAPPURA 679304 R1 TO R3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.CHARISHMA R4 & 5 BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. *********************** W.P(C) No.4429 of 2009 ***************************** Dated this the 7th day of January, 2011 JUDGMENT BASANT, J. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments after filing of this Writ Petition, the petitioner does not want to seek any further relief at this juncture in this Writ Petition. Stop memo has been issued to him. He has to take necessary steps which shall entitle him to continue the work. Without any fetter on him to approach this Court later, if necessary, this Writ petition may now be dismissed as withdrawn, submits the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. We accept the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner. This Writ Petition is, in these circumstances, dismissed as withdrawn. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE) rtr/