IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1702 of 2009 Mosmat Budhani Devi, wife of Late Rajkaran Ram, resident of village-Jhikatiya, P.S.-Goh, District- Aurangabad. ………….Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Vivekanand Singh, the then Officer-in-Charge, Rafiganj Police Station, Aurangabad. 3. Dinesh Singh, Hawaldar, Home Guard, P.S.-Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad, resident of village-Temuda, P.S.- Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad. 4. Raj Kumar Prasad Singh, Constable, Home Guard, resident of village- Pratappur, P.S.-Goh, District- Aurangabad. 5. Sujeet Kumar, Constable Home Guard, P.S.-Rafiganj, resident of village- Pratapur, P.S.-Goh, District- Aurangabad. 6. Ram Lakhan Yadav, Constable, Home Guard, Akouni, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 7. Bijendra Kumar, Assistant Inspector of Police, Rafiganj police station, District- Aurangabad. 8. Sunil Khopade, Superintendent of Police, Aurangabad. ……..Opposite Parties ---------------------------------- 4. 05.12.2011 The complainant petitioner has preferred this revision application against the order dated 27.05.2007 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in complaint case no.433/2007 under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act and ¾ of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 by which the complaint case against the accused opposite party nos. 2 to 7 have been dismissed under Section 203 2 Cr.P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the State and perused the impugned order, it appears that the complainant has been examined on solemn affirmation and four witnesses have been examined in support of her case. The learned Magistrate has considered the averment in the complaint petition, evidence available on the record and also the material in the record of U.D. Case No.4/2007 and post mortem report and other circumstantial evidence. After considering the allegation and the evidence, the learned Magistrate has found that there is no evidence against the accused regarding making a conspiracy or the involvement of any accused. No witness has stated that any accused has been seen to have causing the death of the deceased and FIR had been lodged earlier, which was registered as U.D.Case No.4/2007 and after investigation that case had been held to be a suicidal death. After considering all the materials, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has not found any prima facie case against the accused persons and as such, dismissed the complaint petition under Section 203 Cr.P.C. 3 Considering the facts and circumstances stated above, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)