chandka 1 APP-1003-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 1003 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1971 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 1972 OF 2010 Ruth Samson Schmidt ..Appellant versus Dr. Meena K. Gadre @ Ruth Erulkar & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. E. P. Barucha, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sachin Chandarana, Ms. Pooja Krishnasagar, Ms. Pranika Bhatia, Mr. Shravanth Paruchuri, Ms. Ruth Samson i/b. M/s. Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co. for Appellant. Mr. Kiran Bhosale with Ms. Devika Nigad with Mr. Vinay Bhanushali i/b. Divya Shah & Associates for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. 24 January 2011. P.C. : The Appeal is taken on board by consent. 2. This Appeal arises against the Order of the learned Single Judge chandka 2 APP-1003-10 declining ad interim relief. We are of the view that the interference of this Court at this stage is not warranted since the Motion is still pending for hearing and final disposal. Pleadings in the Motion are complete and parties have agreed that they would apply before the learned Single Judge for expeditious hearing, and we have no doubt that such a request would be considered by the learned Single Judge subject to the exigencies of the Board. The learned Single Judge has furnished reasons for declining ad interim relief including on the ground of delay which cannot be regarded as erroneous. For these reasons, the Appeal is dismissed. However, we clarify that our observations are confined only to the disposal of the Appeal against the ad interim order. The learned Judge shall hear and dispose of the Notice of Motion uninfluenced by all the observations contained in the impugned order as well as in the present Order. (Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud, J.) (Anoop V. Mohta, J.)