1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2307 OF 2010 Shri Gahininath Seva Mandal } Bavi, Tq . Ashti, Dist. Beed } Through its Secreetary } Shrimant S/o Hiraji Sonwane } .... PETITIONER V E R S U S 1. The State of Maharashtra } Through its Secretary } In the Department of School Education Mantralaya, Fort, Mumbai – 32. } 2. The Director of Education } Maharashtra State, Pune. } 3. The Dy. Director of Education } Aurangabad region, Aurangabad. } 4. The Education Officer (Secondary) } Zilla Parishad, Beed. } .... RESPONDENTS Mr. V.M.Chate, Advocate for Petitioner. Mrs. A.V.Gondhalekar, Assistant Govt. Pleader for State. CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE OF JUDGMENT : 19/03/2010 2 ORAL JUDGMENT : ( PER – S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. We have heard Mr. V.M.Chate, Advocate for Petitioner and Mrs. A.V.Gondhalekar, Assistant Govt. Pleader for State. 2. Vide the present Writ Petition, limited grievance is made by the petitioner i.e. proposal submitted to the respondents dated 14/7/2005 has not been considered nor the same is decided. Taking into account the limited prayer made by the petitioner, we hereby direct the respondents to decide the proposal of the petitioner dated 14/7/2005 within the period of 4 months and communicate the decision to the petitioner. 3. Rule thus made absolute in the above terms with no order as to costs. [ S.V.GANGAPURWALA ] [ P.V.HARDAS ] JUDGE JUDGE knp/WP 2307.10 ( J )