Bi :*. ;aA ^ ^e'^g' Hi-ffii <TQ |NTHEHtGH€©Uf^O^®HHAyTISGAR^ WRITPET1TtC>N<S)NO.^J^^ ^^ (•EIITIONER RESPON&ENTS ^^^^ ^cs^ ^ ^<, -ii%- ^'^y^ ..-'.*?£-€-1'" . Amira Bai (Deserted lady), aged abbut 28 years^ wjfe of Shri Deo Kumar; daughterof Dhansai Paikra, residence of — Gram Panchayat KUrkel Khajri, Tahsil Patthalgaon, DistrictJaslipur(CG) VERSUS ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary; Department of Womeii and Child Development, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawari, Raipur S.:1:..<C.G.)::: :•..:.:,;:.;.' ^••'^ »S-.;V' ./•^•^ .^•^ ^.y ^. The DktriGt CoIIector, Jashpur :1(C.G.) •. :'::.;:::; ^ /3. District V/omeit and etiild^Welfare ;::ciffi<3ei',':1Di<>t(,.}9sliRiui^rtCG)::^1"',. •,^4.: |:^h|e^aExecutive^j^{fi!6ei^i]anR^ %1:®ijl*anGliayat'::^^JPattHalga<}^ %g? ^^pur;(€.G.)./^:'::.::s^';;):'^ ^^^ ^"Fhe jProject Qfflcer, Departtnent l^ (SKjld and Woman^^^^ ^ Ift ¥,l'a(thalgadnDistt.)aiihpur(GG) :,^.6^:gj^(^:^g<^ary,::G:raiTi^n^a)(at~;' :,:::^^U!rkgl^:^|iajri,!^iTaH^:£|^l;^^ :.y%l%D>istt..:Jashpur(G.Gi^%.f^^ ..^.jSigrhe ,SyV:E)!ivisiona|, ^fficiSjlRfiv)!': iPiitthalg^Qn, Distt.5asllpui-(^G) / 8.|J||Smt.%||^ltowBai^^^fe|ii)fy!Shri^ , ^^II^is!iai^i/'.^<3ramg;PalKhayafc^:--::.::: ^ glSurket KhajilK T^^ ^^.||I^HCfc;|]asH|}ur^.G.):^'^^:::;^..^ :WRiliiiliiiliMBBSIiiill ^$^ ':.:::;l''?:;®;.%^^:innnnw iaife; •:va •Si9 ^IS ~~y-- HIGHCOURTOFCHHATriSGARHlBlLASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.5569 OF ^06 PETITIONER RESPOMDENTS Amira Bai Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Safish K. Agnihotri, J. Present;- Shri Tarun Dansena, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Goyernment Advocale for the State. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on this 1st day of April, 2011 ) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to other statutory forum, which may be available under the provisions of law. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. It is ordered, as prayed for. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above-stated liberty. 5. Certified copy of the impugned order may be returned back to the petitioner onretaining a photocopy of the same. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ashok