( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1927 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 39 OF 2007 Nilima Nitin Chaudhari and another. APPLICANTS VERSUS Santoshimata Merchants Cooperative Credit Society Ltd., and others. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. V.D. Hon, advocate for the applicants. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 16th February, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. Mr. Hon submits that the dismissal of the petition is due to technical reasons. Considering the explanation given in the application, it appears that the delay is unintentional. It appears that the dismissal of the petition was due to non-removal of office objection. Mr. Hon is ready to comply with the directions and remove the objections immediately. ( 2 ) Having regard to unintentional delay and nature of the dismissal order, I deem it proper to accept the explanation stated in the application. Hence, the delay is condoned. The dismissal order is recalled if the objections are removed within three (3) days. The office to accept the legible copies immediately. The petition is restored to its original position. The civil application is accordingly allowed. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/ca1927-2010