1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2940 OF 2009 IN CRI. REVN. APPLN. NO. 138 OF 2002 Sahebrao Arjun Hon Versus Raosaheb S/o Kashinath Hon and others *** Mr. R. R. Mantri, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. K. S. Bhore, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. *** 1. Heard both the counsel extensively. The acrimonious relations between the complainant and injured with the accused/ petitioner herein has seen tooth and nail of every level of the submission, including challenging the order to the Apex Court. 2. Office objection was raised whereby the accused/ original petitioners were directed to implead Sahebrao and Arjun Datta as party to the Criminal Revision Application. Record indicate Sahebrao Arjun Hon is the party Respondent No.2. However, other injured persons, who are required to be impleaded as Respondents, are not so effected. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. 3. Considering age of the matter, and having regard to the submissions made by Mr. Bhore for the accused/ application, he will implead the injured persons as disclosed in the application in para 4, within a week. The accused/ applicant shall pay costs of rs.500/- to the other side. Application disposed of in above terms. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:07/09/2009. ans/2940