13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV. P. 580/2009 SANJEEV KUMAR Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Khowal, Advocate versus STATE Respondent Through: Mr. Pawan Behl, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN ORDER % 03.06.2010 Today counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he is not pressing this revision petition as far as conviction of the petitioner is concerned. However, a prayer has been made for showing some leniency to the petitioner as far as sentence of imprisonment awarded to him by the trial Court and confirmed by the Appellate Court is concerned. On being asked as to whether the petitioner is willing to compensate financially the dependants of the deceased, learned counsel submitted that petitioner is not in a position to pay any money as compensation. I have gone through the judgments of the two Courts below convicting the petitioner under Sections 279/338/304-A IPC despite the fact that the same are not being challenged now on behalf of the petitioner and I find no infirmity in the judgements. CRL.REV. P. 580/2009 Page 1 of2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified The petitioner has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/-for his conviction under Section 304-A IPC and six months for conviction under Section 338 IPC. Considering the fact that a precious human life has been lost because of the rash and negligent act of driving by the petitioner, I am of the view that trial Court has already shown mercy to the petitioner by awarding him sentence of imprisonment only for a A period of one year and there is no scope for any further reduction in the sentence awarded to the petitioner. This revision petition is accordingly dismissed. is JUNE 03, 2010/pg CRL.REV. P. 580/2009 Page 2 of 2