^/^ Ihgle BencK IN THE HON'BLE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No. "^- / C fRelated Writ Petition (Civil) No. 137^/2010 1 Vs. State of Chhattisgarh &0rs" dismissed for want of prosecuti'on today on 06.12.2010]. PETITIONER: ^Harinder Kaur W/o Trilochan Singh Chawala, aged about 61 years, all R/o Suijeet Niwas, 3/51, Ravi Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS^. ^-;€$ State of Chhattisgarh through their Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 02^ Sub Divisional Officer, Land Acqisition Officer, Raipur, Tahsil: Raipur, Chhattisgarh. OJ3. Collector and Ex-officio Deputy Secretary, Revenue Department, Chhattisgarh Govemmeiit, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ^4. Naya Raipur Development Authority, In front of the Mahanadi Dwar, Mantralaya, Raipur - 492001, Chhattisgarh. Through: Their Chief Executive Officer. '^ APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF WRIT PFTmON (C) No.i3^-2010. It is most respectfully submitted as under: HIGH COURT OF CHHATT8SGARH AT BiLASPUR M.C.C. N0.716 OF 2010 Petitjoner Versus Respondents Harinder Kaur State of Chhattisgarh & Others APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OFW.P.(C) No. 1377/2010 (SB : Hon'ble IVIr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Rajkamal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 08th day of December, 2010) 1. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the counsel for the petitioner could not appear on account of bona fide mistake, therefore, W.P.(C)No.1377/2010, whichwas dismissed on 06.12.2010 may be restored to its file. 2. It appears that the petitjon was dismissed on account of mistake of the Advocate himseif. This applicatlon has been filed immediately on the next date i.e. 7.12.2010. Though, rt is well settled that an application or petition etc. fiied in the Court should not be supported by an affidavit of Advocate. However, in the facts of the case, where the mistake was on the part of the Advocate, and he has expressed regret, the above-stated requirement of filing of affidavit of the applicant/petitioner in support of the application or petition etc. is dispensed with. 3. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P.(C) No. 1377/2010 is restored to the original file. 4, A copy of this order be placed on record of the original writ petition and the same be listed for hearing. _——- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok