IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14213 of 2009 CHANDAN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 18.6.2009 The petitioner is an accused in a case under sections 366,368,376 and 120B of the I.P.C. and section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel submits that in view of the very nature of the allegation no case under section 376 of the I.P.C. would be made out. Learned counsel submits that the complainant stated that the petitioner married her in temple by putting vermilion. She stayed together for three months also. He submits that it would appear from the complaint case itself that the informant / complainant subsequently married another person, namely, Subodh Ram. In the circumstances, the petitioner, Chandan Yadav, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Rosera, Samastipur in Bithan P.S.Case No.71/07. Anilkrsinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)