IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9261 of 2010 NAGESHWAR PRASAD S/O LATE SURENDRA RAI R/O VILL.- PIPARAHI, P.S.- AMNOUR, DISTT.- SARAN. ……….. PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM- SECRETARY BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (PERSONNEL AND WELFARE) BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMINISTRATION), BIHAR, PATNA …………. RESPONDENTS ----------- 2. 07/04/2011 In view of earlier orders of this Court, representation of the petitioner has been rejected by the respondents vide Annexure-6 and petitioner has been denied promotion from the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police to the post of Sub-Inspector of Police on the ground that he has not passed P.T.C. examination. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier petitioner had not passed in one subject but now during the pendency of this application he has passed in all the subjects. In the circumstances, since as per submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, petitioner has become eligible for such promotion now, it is appropriate for him to file formal application before 2 respondent Inspector General of Police enclosing the result of his examination. If the respondent Inspector General of Police is satisfied with regard to the eligibility of the petitioner in view of the said result, he shall take appropriate steps for consideration of the case of the petitioner for promotion to the rank of Sub-Inspector of Police and other benefits of scale etc. as may be claimed by him in his application. Any final decision in this regard shall be taken in accordance with law by the respondent Inspector General of Police preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of such application by the petitioner. The writ application is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)