IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 8339 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: AUGUST 1, 2011 Gurdev Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS Union of India & others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Ashok Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Namit Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.1-A. None for respondent Nos.1 to 3. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner, who is an applicant for being deputed in the Army Postal Services, has a grievance that he was selected and wait listed at No.1. The candidate at serial No.1 in the merit list was found unfit and accordingly, the petitioner was made to undergo medical examination. Initially, he was found to be suffering from some infirmity, which was temporary in nature. The petitioner got himself treated and in the meantime prayed for review Medical Board. The grievance of the petitioner is that the review Medical Board instead found some another infirmity to reject him on the ground that he is medically unfit. Counsel for the petitioner mainly contends that the petitioner should have been given further right to have one chance to seek review of this infirmity found fresh. Otherwise, there is no Civil Writ Petition No. 8339 of 2006 -2- serious dispute that the review Medical Board could test him medically and could arrive at a decision whether he was fit or not and this may not on the ground on which he was found unfit earlier. I do not see any justification or reason to interfere in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Once the petitioner has been found to be unfit for service in the Army by duly constituted Medical Board, writ Court will have hardly any role to play. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. August 01, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH) monika JUDGE