IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 4970 of 2008. Decided on: 30.08.2010. __________________________________________________________ Bhagat Ram. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate vice Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Rekesh Bansal, Advocate vice Mr. Anand Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. None for respondent No.4. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): The present petition is filed with the following reliefs:- “(i) That the final seniority list circulated vide order dated 13.10.1997 (Annexure A-1) to the extent impugned may be quashed and set aside. (ii) That the respondents may be directed to redraw the seniority list by placing the applicant above respondent No.4 with all consequential benefits.” 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - 2. Respondents No.1 and 2 in reply to paras 6 (xx) and (xxi) have filed the following reply:- “(xx) The contents of this sub-para are not denied. However, it is submitted that representation Annexure A-15 was considered by the replying respondents and in the absence of non-submission of relevant documents the same was rejected and final seniority list circulated on 13.10.1997. Now the said final seniority list is being revised on coming into notice the factual service particulars of both the officials. (xxi) Since the seniority list is being revised in which the applicant will be shown senior to respondent No.4, therefore, the present O.A. has become infructuous which may kindly be dismissed in the interest of justice.” 3. In view of the specific undertaking given by respondents No.1 and 2 as enumerated hereinabove, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents No.1 and 2 to do the needful as undertaken by them in the reply by assigning correct seniority to the petitioner, within a period of 12 weeks from today. Needless to add that the petitioner shall be held entitled to all the consequential benefits after refixing his seniority including the promotion from due date. The pending application(s), if any also stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 30, 2010. (sck).