1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 470/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 449/2009 Babasaheb Sonbaji Wasade vs. State of Mah. and 3 others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- CORAM : S.R.DONGAONKAR, J. DATE : 4 th APRIL, 2009 Heard Shri Gputa, Advocate, for the applicant/proposed intervenor, Shri Parsodkar, Advocate, for petitioner, Shri Sonare, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and Shri Madkholkar, Advocate, for Respondent No.4. This is an application by the applicant, one of the directors, seeking intervention in the present petition. According to the applicant, the applicant desires to have proper administration in the bank and therefore, he wants to take part in the present proceedings. He has referred to para 6 of the application which specifically says that he has duty to look after for proper administration of the bank and therefore, he wants to assist the court. Learned counsel for the petitioner has 2 submitted that he was not a party before the lower authorities at any point of time. According to him this application has been filed only to assist and help the respondent No.3 to settle the score against the petitioner and the application is malafide. Considering the circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant should be allowed only to address the court, if he wants at the time of final hearing of the petition. Accordingly, only to that extent, this application is allowed. Application disposed of. JUDGE Rvjalit