^F ,S- • . -"••••-—- _-^ w^ss^-WS'^^£SS^y^^^i^^^^^^^ IN THS KICTi COURT OF JUDICATUR3;CHHATTISGA3K jBIL;^SPUR ^'" . ^^ Writ Petition No. \_/2001 1» Ihe State or Chhattisgarh through Divisional Employroent Orflcer, Korba, DistrictsKorba. (Chhattisgarh)-s^^-^ ^^.--—•^r^sr'' 1, Nirry.Behrai S/o Shri Babarya Behra, Adile Mohalla» Bablu Chal^ iSiear Kali Mandir» Korba (Chhafetisgarh) 2o The Presiding Officer/ Labour Court, Bilaspur Under Industrial Dispute Act» Bilaspur (Ghhs'fc'tisgarh) 'wf'^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICuES. 226/227_uF_TgS CCWS3':ITUa?Ip^ OE' IITOIA iXI-HC-22. •S^'^Kv^S^Sw'if^w'wy. snt?i?Bi FTRi^an^l ^THN^'^ftn _U>£:/'&:..&&a<^^ 200 Iq^a sii^i'g^nw.'FiiCT ^iqTSTTR "m?S'? feCTt ;rf ^7 Sifigtl .STI^I 08-07-200a Shn Raabir Singh, Govfc Ad^ocate for tfae petitioner. Sliri S.P.Kale, leamed coun^el foii-the respondents. Having heard Shri Ranbir S^ngh, leamed counsel for the petitioner, fhe Court is not inc^ined to entertain fhis writ petitiou. The tennination of fhe respondent No. 1 has been quashed for non-coinpliance ofpr4vMions contained ia Scction | 25(F) of thc Industrial Disputes A^t, 1947. It is not disputed 1 that fhe said respondent No. 1 ha4 served under the petitioner 1 - -- ._-^ - __J 1 fiioin May 1990 to Januaiy 2000 when his semces were ! termiaated. It is furfher not dispiijted fhat a suin of Rs.3730/, which was eqiuvalent to onc mont^i's salaiy was ofiFered, which was obviousty not iu coD&miily w^fh fhe provisions conlauied I inSection25(F)offheAct | 1 I On the above admitted position no crror has been j conunitted by fhe Laboiir Court, Eiflaspur, ia settu^-aside the i j order of termination and orderiog reaistatement wifh back i wages. | In view of above observa^ions, the petition s^ads dismisscd. Sd/- P.C. Naik Judge