IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE NINETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.P. No.29254 of 2011 Between: Sunkari Devakka … Petitioner And The Government of A.P., Rep. By its Principal Secretary, Women & Child Welfare Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others. … Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.P. No.29254 of 2011 ORDER: This writ petition has been filed seeking for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Anganwadi Aaya (Worker) against the vacancy at Anganwadi Centre, Muttapur Village, Bhimini Mandal, ICDS Project, Sirpur (T) Adilabad District as she is fully qualified and alone eligible among the candidates to be appointed as Anganwadi Aaya (Worker) by duly declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in not issuing appointment order even though the petitioner was subjected to interview and fully qualified, as illegal and violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. The case of the petitioner is that she belongs to B.C. “D” (Munnuru Kapu) community and resident of Muttapur Village, Bhimini Mandal, Adilabad District. Pursuant to the notification dated 17.06.2010, issued by the 6th respondent, Child Development Project Officer, she applied and got interviewed for the post of Anganwadi Aaya (Worker) against the vacancy at Anganwadi Centre, Muttapur Village, Bhimini Mandal, Adilabad District. Thereafter, no orders have been passed thereon. Hence, she filed the present writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the petitioner, along with others, was interviewed, no selection list has been announced. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. The main grievance of the petitioner is that though she was interviewed for the post of Anganwadi Aaya (Worker), no selection list has been announced, either in respect of the petitioner or others. Hence, I deem it appropriate to direct the respondents to pass appropriate orders. Accordingly, the 6th respondent, Child Development Project Officer, is directed to pass appropriate orders forthwith, in the case of the petitioner pursuant to the interview faced by her. With the above, direction, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH Date: 09.11.2011 LSK