IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2199 of 2011 SUNIL KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 19.05.2011 Heard the parties and perused the order dated 27.04.2011. Petitioner wants clarification in the following passage appearing at the end of the order:- “In view of that order, it is expected that the Transport Department of the State of Bihar will not linger with the appointment of 20 selected candidates and complete the appointment in the light of the recommendations made by the Commission at the earliest, preferably within four weeks.” In our view, the word “expected” used in the said part of our order is a clear indication that the State of Bihar has to complete the appointment of 20 selected candidates in the light of the recommendation already made by the Commission at the earliest, preferably within four weeks. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the delay is being caused at the behest of some deputationists, who want to continue with the ad hoc 2 arrangement and to work in the same capacity. Their number is said to be around 62 and they do not want regular appointment to materialise. We are of the view that the order passed by us is quite clear and in case there is attempt to delay the appointment of selected candidates, the remedy of the petitioner would lie in not seeking clarification but in enforcement of the aforesaid order. This application stands disposed of. SC (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)