CWP No.7042 of 2008(O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.7042 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.09.2011 Gurmail Singh ... Petitioner Versus Financial Commissioner, Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. Sanjay Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana, for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. H.P.S. Ishar, Advocate, for respondents No.5 and 6. ***** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (Oral) Learned counsel appearing for the parties have fairly state that first appeal arising out of the civil suit is pending disposal before the Additional District Judge, Yamuna Nagar. Learned counsel appearing for the parties further stated that no decision, finding or observation in a summary proceedings for correction of Khasra Girdawari shall be taken as res judicata in a civil suit or pending appeal arising out of civil suit and pending appeal shall be decided without being prejudiced from any observation finding or decision recorded in the impugned orders. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General states that necessary correction shall be carried in the Khasra Girdawari as per the final verdict in a suit, which is pending at the appellate stage. In view of the statements made by the learned counsel for the CWP No.7042 of 2008(O&M) [2] parties, present petition is disposed of with the direction that the appeal pending between the parties shall be decided on its own merit in accordance with law without being prejudiced from any observation, finding or decision in a summary proceedings for correction of Khasra Girdawari, which is a subject matter of this petition. SEPTEMBER 21, 2011 (ALOK SINGH ) Rajan JUDGE