IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 6594 OF 200 PETITION NO. 6594 OF 200 PETITION NO. 6594 OF 2003 Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union ....... Petitioner. versus Security Guards Bo ard for. Bombay & Thane District & Ors. ...... Respondents. ..... Shri S.S. Pakle for the petitioner. Mss. Lundi with Mrs. Lata S. Desai for the Respondent. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR & MRS. MRS. MRS. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. DATED; DATED; DATED; 23RD AUGUST, 2004. 23RD AUGUST, 2004. 23RD AUGUST, 2004. P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. Heard the learned counsel for petitioners and Respondents. 2. The issue involved in this petition is covered by the decision of this court in W.P.No. 1538 of 2001 (Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshad Aghadi Vs. The Security Buards Board for Gr. Bombay and Thane and ors.) decided on 5th February 2003. 3. Mr. Pakale learned counsel appearing for the petitioners stated that the concerned security guards will apply to the Board for registration within two weeks from today. The board shall decide the application within four weeks from the date of receipt thereof and allot the concerned security guards as per Board’s sceheme. 4. Petition accordingly disposed of. 5. Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order. ....