1 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 682 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 394 OF 2002 Abhyudaya Co-op. Bank Ltd. .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents Mr. Milind More for applicant. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for State. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. May 07, 2010. P.C. Not on board, taken on board. Register. We have noted that despite service of notice, on admission of this appeal, respondent nos.2 and 3 i.e. Shri Sanjay Waman Ghadi and Shri 2 Ashok Raju Sheregar have not caused their appearance till this date. Mr. More, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-bank had issued Advocate’s notice to the said respondents to cause their appearance before us and the postal envelopes have been returned on the ground that the addressees are not available on the given address. As per Mr. More the bank does not have any record of the present address of respondent nos.2 and 3. The learned APP states that the appeal cannot be finally decided unless respondent nos.2 and 3 are before this court. Hence, the Registry is directed to issue bailable warrant against respondent nos.2 and 3 and the warrants to be executed by the concerned police station i.e. GB CB CID, Mumbai. Warrants be made returnable on 9th June, 2010. Criminal Application disposed off accordingly. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)