THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22625 of 2009 ORDER: Respondent No.4 filed W.P.No.15750 of 2008 before this Court against respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and the petitioner herein, complaining that the petitioner has made unauthorised construction and respondent Nos. 1 to 3 did not take any action against him. The writ petition was disposed of on 22.07.2008, directing respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to consider the representation of respondent No.4 and pass appropriate orders thereon. Accordingly, an order was passed on 06.09.2008, holding that the construction made by the petitioner is illegal and requiring him to remove the same within seven days from the date of receipt of the order. The petitioner submitted an application to avail the benefit under the Building Penalisation Scheme (B.P.S.) for regularisation of the unauthorised construction. That application was dismissed on 06.08.2009. Thereafter, respondent Nos.1 to 3 demolished the offending structure. The petitioner claims to have preferred an appeal before the appellate authority against the order, dated 06.08.2009. This writ petition is filed with a prayer to direct the appellate authority to expedite the hearing and not to interfere with the work of re-fixation of windows and doors that were removed in pursuance of the order of rejection. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3. It is not in dispute that the petitioner made unauthorised construction without obtaining permission. Respondent No.4 initiated steps and the same resulted in the order, dated 06.09.2008. The petitioner made an attempt to save the unauthorised construction by filing application under B.P.S. Even that application was dismissed. Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 are said to have caused demolition of the structure mainly by removing the windows and doors. The petitioner availed the remedy of appeal. There cannot be any plausible objection for issuance of a direction to the appellate authority to dispose of the appeal at an early date. However, the request of the petitioner to permit him to refix the windows and doors cannot be acceded to. He has to await the outcome of the appeal. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing that the appellate authority shall pass appropriate orders in the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order, dated 06.08.2009, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:22.10.2009 kdl