IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.1279 of 1986 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.02.2011 Subrati (deceased) through LR ...Appellant Versus State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Ashish Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. A perusal of the paperbook shows that after the elevation of the counsel, who filed the present appeal to the Bench, repeatedly notices were issued to the appellant. However, the same were received back unserved. There is one report dated 5.3.2004 stating that the appellant had expired. A perusal of the impugned award shows that for the purpose of assessment of compensation, the learned court below had relied upon its earlier award pertaining to the same acquisition. There is no information available with the court at the moment whether any further enhancement of compensation by this court or Hon’ble the Supreme Court for the land acquired by the same notification, has been granted. In view of the aforesaid factual situation, this court does not have any other option but to dismiss the appeal in default. Ordered accordingly. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 03.02.2011 sharmila