! !:.i L- •j lh i4,i Q /t.BL^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT ^ BILASPUR CIVILREVISIONNO. / 2004 ApDlicants (Defendants) / 1. Kapil S/o Umru Gond, Aged about .A^> .&y.-<^:-"- .^•<y''i&"" ./ ^%""/ ^/Y.y'. /''.•"'. -'<>''/ /' y /'iS1- C5"' /{ ^•^;' <•" ,,<^ <<€& ^ e^. IW^' ..^' &' 23 years 2^ Ramula BaiW/o Umru Gond, Aged about 50 years 3./ Laduram S/o Som Singh, Aged about 32 years Indalram S/o Sop Singh Gond, Aged about 25 years 5./ Hatiyarin Bai W/o Sop Singh Gond, Aged about 60 years. ; AU R/o Nayapara, Ghad Dongn, TehsU Nagri, Dist: Dhamtari-(C.G.) 6./ Baliadur S/o Daulat Singh, Aged about 39 years 7^ Mohau, S/o Daulat Singh, Aged about 30 years. 8. Cherka S/o Danulsingh, Aged about 25 years 9.^, Rambhuwan S/o Dauulsingh, Aged atout 20 years 10. Jai Singh S/o Danulsmgh, Aged about 24 '' years 11. Manai Bai W/o Jhadu Ram Gond, Aged <. about 35 years 12. Bhav Singh S/o Renu Ram, Aged about 30» years 13. Roop Singh S/o Man Singh, Aged about 46 ^ years 14, Shobharam S/o Devi Singh, Aged about 22 years 15. Devran S/o Kanwal Singh, Aged abput 25 years lf,i'"; -I -?" n. !| f 16. /I7. Versus Non ADplicant (Plaintiffs) ^- ^ 20: 7 22. 23. ^ (2) Dhanwar S/o Meeladau, Aged about 49 years Applicants 6 to 16 are R/oVUlage Gad Dongri, Rayatwari, Review Division Sihava, TehsU Nagri, Dist : Dhamtari- Dhanushram S/o Meeladau, Aged about 36 years Sonu S/o Meeladau, Aged about 25 years Laxmimant S/o Shobitram Gond, Aged about 40 years Usankumar S/o Shobitram Gond, Aged about 35 years Dhan Bai W/o Shobitram Gond, Aged about 60 years Rohit Das S/o Khamman Gond, Aged about 40 years Sukhmateen Bai \Wo Khamman Gond R/oA.U\ Village Ghad Dongri Post Belargaon, TehsU Nagri, Dist: Dhamtari-(C.G.) Loknath S/o Mayaram, Aged about 38 years 2. ^ Vikram Singh S/o Mayaram, Aged about 35 Years 3. 4, 5.. 6. 7. Chandaa Singh S/o Mayaram, Aged about 32 years Hemlal S/o Mayaram, Aged about 29 years Kamla Bai S/o Mayaram, Aged about 27 years Maha Bai S/o Mayaram, Aged about 23 years Budhiya Bai W/o Mayaram, Aged about 58 years 1 ^ ^ 8. >°• 11.. (3) Ramdayal S/o Bhanwar Singh Gond, Aged about 47 years Gopal S/o Bhanwar Singh Gond, Aged about 33 years Rahipal Smgh S/o Bhanwar Singh Gond, Aged about 36 years Sahadeo S/o Bhanwar Siugh Gond, Aged about 33 years Respondents 1 to 11 are R/o Ghad Dongri, Rayatwari Revenue Devision Sihawa Tehsil Nagri, Dist: Dhamtari-(C.G.) ^.. State of Chhatdsgarh.1^°^ <^ ^QtA-l.^-^''. <^ <t| —(FormalDefendant) CTVTL REVISION U/S 115 OF THE CODE OF CWEL PROCEDURE '"•'—l"^..^Au^j«Tv~-"'-in->^ pt<"I f^.ff\p,-r^ftgj-ptf^ :f^ Q3_2QQ4_nass£dJn li :^"T??T" (• ..)•;. 1-hl. V^SS-nS-3-KS •g^:ISSI i •'•; M. ^l?^"1"""1 3^ ^IMId'i], yrllyi^, r««rll^1< ^.^o^^l^ sv^i 'qsw ('plais?) ^t Vf fiiTTO 3TI^Ta»<if* ^tiiw^fefsn^i SIu-i Anaiid Dadaria.^dv. fer the applicant. Ku. Saageeta Mishraj P.L. for ftie State. Heard on adiaission. ^. i The instaat revision ils directed agamst fhe order dated 22-3- 2004 passed by the IInd (fiv3. Judge Class -1, Dhamtan ia Civil Suit No. 358-A/98 whereb^ aad whereiuider leanied tnal Court' bas passed the onler to dec^de Issue No. 14 along wifh other issues and fhe inatter was fixed fo^ plamtiffs' evidence on 1-7-2004. Shri Atiaad Dadaria, .1 subiait that fhe question wi Section 11 ofC.P.C. can be earaed coiuisel for ffae applicaat would hether or not the suit is barred uader Idecided by &; a pi-elimiaaiy issue ia this regarcl aad, fherefore| the direction ofthe leanied tria! Court to decide tlie saine along ttifh ofher issiies is iiot is. accordance wifh law aad is wifliout juri^diction. This inatter is pendia^ since 2004. Shri Dadaria is not aware as to what is fhe status of t4e suit tiU now and therefore, ia view of the above, fhe revision filed) by fhe applicant has no merit as till now the evidence m.ust have |been adduced by fhe pai-ties. Therefore, in view of t|he above, fhe revision being devoid of substance is liable to be a|id is heretoy dismissed at adiuission stage. Sd/- - N. K. Agarwal Judge