1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3629 OF 2009 Laxman S/o.Sakharam Gayakwad, APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Mr.Sachin Deshmukh, learned counsel for applicant. Mrs.Y.M.Kshirsagar, learned APP for State (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 25/11/2009 PER COURT : 1. This is an application by the applicant to release him on bail in connection with CR No.46/2005 who had run from the jail while in the Magistrate Custody. 2. When the fact is brought to the notice of learned advocate for applicant that when the accused, who ran away from the jail while in Magistrate Custody, can it be said that honestly he will face the trial and not jump the bail. This is not a fit case where the Court to consider the case of the applicant on merit and as such there is no guaranty of the fair trial because of attitude and behaviour of the applicant. In the premise, learned advocate only seeks leave of this Court to give directions to the Trial Court/Sessions Court to finish 2 the trial pending against the present applicant expeditiously. This request is accepted. In the premise, the application deserves following order : O R D E R 1. Application for bail stands rejected. 2. The Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli is hereby directed to dispose of the sessions case pending against the present applicant and two others within the period of 6 months from the date of receipt of writ of this order. 3. While calculating the period of 6 months, the adjournments if any asked by the accused/defence to be excluded. 4. Application to be disposed of accordingly. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/NOV 2009/cri.appl.3629-09