HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILJUSPUR DIVISION BBNCH CORAM: HON'BLEMR. T.P. 8HARMA & HON'BLEMIR. R. L. JHANWAR. JJ. oc. K. «o.isa/aoao APPUCANT COMPLAINANT VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS 1. Ku. Manisha D/o Shankar Prasad Gupta, aged about 17 years, through her fafher and natiiral guardlan SIiaiikar Prasad Gupta s/o late Qhanshyam Prasad Oupta, aged about 45 years, R/o VUlage Jarhi Bhatgaon, P.S. Bha^aon, District Sui^uja (C.G.). Sonu Smgja@ Maiiish Singh @ Raja s/o late Ramashankar Singh @ Shivnath Singh Gupta, aged about 26 years, R/o Village Shaktt Nagar, Jarhi, District Surguja (C.G.). (ACCUSED) The State of Chhatdsgarh, throu^i P.S. Bhalsaon, Distorict Sai^uja (C.O.). (PROSECUTION) CRIMINAL REVISION UNDER SECTION397/4010F THE CODB OP CRiaDNAL PROCE»mtE. Present- Shri A.K. Prasad, Advocate for fhe appllcant. Shri R.R. Sinha, P.L. forthe State/non-appUcant No. 2. Non-appllcant No. 1 not noticed. 2. ORAL-ORD]^ (Passedon 04/04/2011) The followina iudement of ttie Court was oassed bv T.P. Sharma. J:- 3. 4. By ttus criminal revislon iiader Section 397/401 of &e Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the 'Code') agsiinst the judgment of acqulttal dated 10/2/2010 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Surajpur District Surguja (C.O.) in Sessions tidal No.15/2009. Leamed counsel for fhe applicant submits that he seeks to withdraw this crimmal revision with liberty to file appeal against the judgment of acqiiittal in accordance with the proviso of Section 372 offhe Code. Prayer aUowed. Consequentfy, crumiial revision is dismlssed as wittidrawm wlth aforesald Uberty. Certified copy of the judgment impugaed be rettM-ned to the leamed counsel for fhe applicant on subaiission duly photostatted copy ofthe same. Sd/- T.P.Shai'8118 Judge Sd/- R.L. Jhanwar Judge