IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Civil Review No.84 of 2010 in CWP No.427 of 2008. Date of decision: 12.08.2010. Govind Ram … …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. … …Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Dev Darshan Sud,J. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kuldip Singh,J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 No. For the Petitioner: Mr.M.L. Sharma, Advocate. For Respondents No.1 to 3: Mr.Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. Dev Darshan Sud,J. This review petition has been preferred by the petitioner herein against the judgment of this Court passed on 25th March, 2010 dismissing the case of the petitioner herein. 2. The petitioner seeks to challenge it on the ground that the case of the petitioner needs to have been considered under Rule 13.5(4) of the Punjab Police Rules for regulation etc. In the judgment, we have considered in detail the fact that the basis of the claim for seniority of the petitioner is from the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? Yes. 2 seniority list of 1963 which cannot be challenged in 2007. The review petition is nothing but a means for arguing/rearguing the entire case again. This petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (Dev Darshan Sud) Judge. August 12, 2010. (Kuldip Singh) (aks) Judge.