In the Punjab and Haryana High Court, at Chandigarh. CRM-M- 14356 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on Aug 12,2011 Hardeep Singh --Petitioner vs. State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Jagjit Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr.Sagar Deswal, AAG,Haryana Rakesh Kumar Jain,J:(Oral) This is a petition for regular bail pending trial under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 (for short, Cr.P.C.) in a case FIR No.34 dated 09.3.2011, under Sections 323, 324, 307, 285, 506, 34& 25/54/59 Arms Act IPC, at Police Station, Kalanwali. Allegation against the petitioner is that he had caused one injury to Rajender on his right elbow and another to Gurpreet on his left arm with a kirpan. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both the injuries have been found to be simple in nature and the petitioner is in custody since 22.3.2011. Earlier, the petitioner was agitating that he was a juvenile but now vide order dated 11.8.2011 passed by the learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Sirsa, he has not been found to be juvenile. A copy of the said order is produced on record by the learned State Counsel. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had earlier caused grievous injury to Rajender, as a result of which FIR No. 194 dated 16.10.2010 was registered in the same police station, therefore, CRM-M-14356 of 2011 (O&M) -2- he does not deserve the concession of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that in the said case, the petitioner was released on bail and would not repeat any such thing after having been released on bail by this Court and in order to ensure it, this Court may impose any stringent condition on the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody for causing simple injuries from almost five months and the challan has already been presented. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case but without making any observations on the merit, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds with heavy surety to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court and also with the condition that he will mark his presence every day in the Police Station Kalanwali, District Sirsa, during the investigation of this case. It is made clear that in case the petitioner does not comply with the condition so imposed, then the State is at liberty to move an application for cancellation of his bail. A copy of this order be given to the learned State Counsel under the signatures of Bench Secretary of this Court. August 12,2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge