CRM No. M 6695 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 6695 of 2010 Date of decision: 12.08.2010 Sarmail Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: None for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for issuing of direction to respondents No. 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner which is being infringed at the best of respondents No. 4 and 5. Notice of motion was issued. Pursuant thereto, reply by way of affidavit of Wazir Singh, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Zira on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3 has been filed. As per the aforesaid reply, an application dated 27.02.2010 was received in the office of Senior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur which was marked to the DSP for inquiry and report. The matter was inquired into thoroughly and it was found that the allegations of the petitioner regarding the taking of mobile CRM No. M 6695 of 2010 2 phone, DBBL Gun and Jeep along with milk drums was false. It was also found that only Sarmel Singh-petitioner was called to the police station for recording his statement. It is wrong that Hardeep Singh and Baldev Singh were ever called by the Station House Officer, Police Station Mallanwala, as alleged. They were also not threatened for the involvement in any false cases. The allegations of the petitioner as contained in para 6 of the petition were found to be false. It was further submitted that Beant Kaur wife of Jarmal Singh moved an application against her husband Jarmal Singh, Lakhwinder Singh son of Joginder Singh, petitioner Sarmel Singh, Hardeep Singh son of Gurbachan Singh and Baldev Singh son of unknown before the Station House Officer, Police Station Mallanwala with the allegation that she is being maltreated at the hands of her husband and threats were being given to her by accused party including Sarmel Singh with a gun to eliminate her. Today, Mr. K S Pannu, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions from HC-Narender Singh, Police Station Mallanwala, states that in pursuance to the said complaint, FIR No. 46 dated 02.06.2010 under Sections 498, 494-A IPC has been registered at Police Station Mallanwal, Ferozepur against the present petitioners. In view of the reply that the petitioner was never threatened and FIR is registered against him, no further order is required to be passed in the present petition. Dismissed. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge August 12, 2010 mohan