IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 7952 of 2010 Decided on: 16.12.2010. _____________________________________________________ Tej Singh. …Petitioner. Versus. The State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. ___________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral). The writ petition has been filed for following prayers: “(i). That the writ petition may very kindly be allowed and the salary, as ordered to be fixed vide Annexure P-5 and Annexure P-6 may kindly be declared void ab-initio and same may kindly be set aside, in the interest of justice. (ii). That the respondents may kindly be directed to pay the revised pay scale and other benefits from the date of initial appointment to the petitioner, as is being paid to the similarly situated teachers, with all consequential benefits.” 2. Petitioner has submitted that he is similarly situated as the petitioners in the decision rendered by this Court in CWP (T) No. 14232 of 2008, titled Nek Ram and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 17.11.2009. It is further submitted that the decision has also been implemented. In 2 case the petitioner is similarly situated person as the petitioners in the judgment referred to above, similar treatment shall be given to the petitioner herein also, after verifying the facts within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the first respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. (Justice V.K. Sharma) Judge. December 16, 2010. (cr/virender)