CRM-M No. 7074 of 2011 **** Jagmohan Singh vs. State of Punjab Present: Mr. J.S. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Dr.U.S.Dhaliwal, Addl.AG, Punjab. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 133 dated 18.10.2010, under Section 376 IPC registered at Police Station Haibowal, District Ludhiana. Learned counsel has argued that the FIR reveals a concocted story because on one hand the prosecutrix states that she did not like the petitioner and on the other hand she went to his house. As per learned counsel the allegation she went to attend a phone call of her relative to his house is also wrong because in some love letters allegedly written by her to the petitioner she has mentioned her telephone number. He further states that since the complainant is admittedly more than 16 years of age, the learned Additional Sessions Judge was wrong in brushing aside the argument that she was a consenting party by mentioning that in the case of a minor consent is immaterial. In my opinion, the interest of justice would be met if the petitioner surrenders before the learned trial Court and the learned trial Court passes the order on regular bail application within three days after keeping in mind the above mentioned contentions. With this observation this petition is disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE March 18, 2011 sunita