IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30487 of 2009 BINOD KUMAR, S/O RAM SEWAK DIWAKAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KATRI, P.S.-GHATAMPUR, DISTRICT KANPUR (U.P.) ………………………………..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR .………………………………..Opposite Party. WITH Cr.Misc. No.40854 of 2009 RAMU, SON OF RAJA RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BABARPUR, POLICE STATION-AJITMAL, DISTRICT- ORAIYA (U.P.) ………………………………..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR .………………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 03/ 18.11.2009 Since both the above bail applications have arisen out of an occurrence which has led to registration of the First Information Report under Section 20 of the N.D.P.S. Act, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. It appears from the order of Cr. Misc. No. 2484 of 2009 dated 27.02.2009 that these petitioners have filed two bail applications before this Court. Considering the fact that another bail application was also filed which was tried to conceal, his bail application was dismissed. These petitioners have tried to deceive the Court so they do not deserve sympathy of this 2 Court and they cannot equate themselves with those who have been enlarged on bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the above named petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for bail is again rejected. However, as the trial has already been started, so it is directed to expedite the trial. kksinha/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J. )