IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1502 of 1993 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ ICHCHHUBHAI U PATEL Versus SURAT JILLA SAHAKARI DUDH UTPATAK SANGH LTD (SUMUL DAIRY -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 1502 of 1993 MR PC MASTER for Petitioner No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD Date of decision: 29/06/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT Heard learned advocate Mr. Master for the petitioner. Though notice has been served upon the respondent, after the elevation of Justice P.B. Majmudar, no one has remained present on behalf of the respondent. In this petition, the petitioner has challenged the award made by the labour court in reference No. 42 of 1980 dated 29th August, 1992 wherein the reference has been rejected by the labour court concerned. This petition was admitted by the Court on 15th March, 1993. Today, when the matter has been taken up for final hearing, learned advocate Mr. Master appearing for the petitioner has placed on record letter dated 17th December, 2000 written by the petitioner wherein the petitioner has addressed the said letter to Mr. Master and has requested that he is not prepared to proceed further with the matter as there was talk of settlement out side the Court with the respondent directly by the petitioner. In view of this letter dated 17th December, 2000 addressed by the petitioner to Mr. Master, learned advocate Mr. Master has sought leave to withdraw this petition. Leave is granted. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. 29.6.2002. (H.K.Rathod,J.) Vyas