IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 9987 of 2011 Date of decision August 19, 2011 Des Raj Gupta and another ....... Petitioners Versus Chandigarh Administration and another ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Manjit Singh, Advocate for Mr. Puneet Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J. R. Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Counsel for the respondent states that election notification has been made on 21.6.2011 and the declaration of result would be made on 26.9.2011. The order passed by the Deputy Commissioner's office at Chandigarh is taken on record and having regard to the information supplied, the writ petition has become infructuous. 2 The writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 19, 2011 archana