HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT APPEAL NO.1719 of 2002 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.Prakash Rao) The unsuccessful petitioner is the appellant, who seeks to assail the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition where he sought for a mandamus assailing the correctness of the proceedings dated 17/05/2002 whereby his services were terminated. Though several grounds were urged on behalf of the appellant/petitioner, however, having regard to the fact that the petitioner has got efficacious alternative remedy under the provisions of the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious and Endowments Ac, 1987, permitting the same, the writ petition was disposed of. Hence, this writ appeal. Having heard the learned counsel on either side and on perusal of the material on record, we are in entire agreement with the learned Single Judge, and especially, in view of the remedy available, it is not open for the appellant to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed subject to availment of alternative efficacious remedy. The appellant is permitted to file a revision within a period of four weeks from today. No order as to costs. _________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J _____________ K.C.BHANU, J Date: 09-09-2009 Note: Furnish C.C.by one week. B/o. SKM