IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.918 of 2010 DEEPAK TANTI SON OF SACHIDANAND TANTI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.1.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner had been given liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge by an order dated 18.8.2009 passed in Cr.Misc.No.28894 of 2009 and now the charges have been framed on 17.11.2009, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 27.5.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Assistant Sessions Judge II, Munger in S.C.No.606 of 2009 arising out of Kharagpur P.S.case No.60 of 2006, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse of bail and (iii) that the petitioner will be well - 2 - represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )