IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3647 of 2011 SUGRIV SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.03.2011 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 272, 273 of the India and 47(A) of the Excise Act. It is alleged that 70 pouches each containing 400 ml and 1100 pouches each containing 200 ml country made liquor were recovered from the shop of the petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the person who was interested in getting the shop vacated got the petitioner implicated in the present false case. Moreover the petitioner has never been implicated in any other case. Considering the nature of allegations, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. However, let the learned court below consider regular bail application of the petitioner, if possible on the same day considering the fact that the petitioner’s brother is on inimical term with the informant. Ravi (Dinesh Kumar Singh)