iesiiondents Writ Versus 2) •3; Satish Kuma' Pandev. S/o. Akshav Kumar Pandey, aged about 41 years, R/o. PandripanL Tahsii & Dist. Raiaarh, CG.. State of ChhatSisgam, through the Secretan', School Eduoation Department, D.K.S. Shawan, The Upper Secretaiy; Schooi Educatlon Department, D.K.S. r^ -^, ^~., ,/Mw r~)^:n i >i" f^>/~' fc;fis'wsri; KSipur; uu,. The District Education OlTicer. Dist. Raigarh, CG. T.C. Patei, S/o. Motichand, aged about 57 years, rlo. • Viljage -atssar, Tahsii Sakti, Dist. Janjgir Ghampa, CG y; (Petition under Articie 228 ofthe Constitution of India) iinotri Present: Shri R.K. Shukal, counse! forthe pstifionar. Ku. Sunita Jaln, Panei Lawyer for the State ^S^I f^SSf^i (Passed o" 7''" May, 2007) The petitioner is impugning She order dated 29-4-200S (Annexure P/4) w.hereunder and whsr.eby ons Shn T.C. Pate! - responasni No.4 has been piaced under suspension. 2j Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner submits that, at the relevant time, respondent No.4 was not posted as inchafne District cducation Officer at Raigarh, but the petitioner was posted at Raigarh. 3) Be that as it may, it is the subject matter of tne enquiry and the pesitionsr cannot be aggrieved by the impuaned order of susoension w,iiCh is oassed Sd/- „ Satish K.Agnihotri - Judge .,