IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP-T No.: 2772 of 2008. Decided on: 09.11.2010. __________________________________________________________ Rajinderjit Singh. … Petitioner. Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board. … Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate. For the Respondent : Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Case of the petitioner has not been considered for promotion to the higher post since he remained on unauthorized leave from 3.9.1977 to 6.12.1987. This period has been treated as “dies-non”. Ms. Anjula Khajuria, learned counsel for the respondent-Board fairly submits that the case of the petitioner can now be considered for promotion in view of Instruction No.4 appended below F.R. 17-A. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-Board to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the higher post strictly within the ambit of Instruction No.4 appended below F.R. 17-A, within a period of two months from the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - date of production of certified copy of this judgment. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 09, 2010. (sck).