1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION No. 9 OF 2007 Ranjit Gangadhar Narnaware v. Mohanlal Mohta & anr. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders Mr.Prashant Shende Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.V.V.Bhangde Advocate for Res. no.1. Mr.Nilesh Adbe Adv. for Res. no.2. .... CORAM: A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 16 th AUGUST, 2007. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Having seen the order dated 24.2.2006 made by this Court it appears that this Court issued a direction that in case any vacancy arises in future respondents 2 & 3 shall proceed in accordance with the provisions of Clauses (2) & (3) of the Circular dated 9.7.1987. 3. Before me, the counsel for the rival 2 parties have a serious dispute as to whether really vacancy is available or not. It is not possible to decide such an issue in contempt proceedings. The only remedy available to the petitioner is to approach the appropriate forum by substantive writ petition. In view of this, writ petition disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach with substantive writ petition. Contempt notice discharged. JUDGE /TA/