IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 340 of 2008 Between: Kanukuntla Venkata Rajam S/o. Agaiah R/o. 12-8-308,Hunter Road Warangal ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House officer, Jagtial Karimnagar District 2 The Inspector of Police, Jagtial Karimnagar district 3 Bingi Rajesham S/o.Narsaiah R/o. 4-1-118,Jagtial,Karimnagar District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in coercing the petitioner to transfer the properties purchased by him under registered sale deeds vide Document Nos.419 and 420 of 2005 dated 11.2.2005 in favour of the third respondent as arbitrary, illegal, violative of Art.14 ,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 not to coerce the petitioner to transfer the properties purchased by him under registered sale deeds vide Document Nos.419 and 420 of 2005 dated 11.2.2005 in favour of the third respondents Counsel for the Petitioner:Mr.G. Madhusudhan Reddy Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Assistant Government Pleader for Home Counsel for respondent No.3: None appeared The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.1 and 2 in coercing the petitioner to transfer the properties purchased by him under registered sale deeds dated 11-02-2005 in favour of respondent No.3 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional. Heard Sri G. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. Though the petitioner made serious allegations against respondent Nos.1 and 2 to the effect that at the instance of respondent No.3, they have been harassing him and detained him in the police station for a day on 04-01-2008, the learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions denied the said allegations and stated that respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have not been interfering with the life and liberty of the petitioner. Without going into the correctness or otherwise of the stand of respondent Nos.1 and 2, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to them not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner in connection with the civil dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.3 in future. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP No. 355 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Dated: 24-04-2008 ks ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Station House officer, Jagtial Karimnagar District 2 The Inspector of Police, Jagtial Karimnagar district 3 2CCs to the Assistant Government Pleader for Home, Hyderabad (OUT) 4 2CD copies