FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4184 OF 2010 [Anagha @ Saroj Anil Akolkar vs The State of Maharashtra and ors.] _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Shri S.G.Jadhavar, advocate for the applicant Smt. Y.M.Kshirsagar, A.P.P. for respondent no.1 Shri D.B.Shinde, holding for Shri R.S.shinde, advocate for respondent nos. 2 to 7 ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 31 st March, 2011. PER COURT :- 1 Heard Shri S.G.Jadhavar, advocate for the applicant, Smt. Y.M.Kshirsagar, A.P.P. for respondent no.1 and Shri D.B.Shinde, holding for Shri R.S.shinde, advocate for respondent nos. 2 to 7. Respondent no. 8 is reportedly expired. 2 Learned counsel Shri Jadhavar for the applicant, on instructions, submits that the applicant, who is the first informant/victim shall prefer appeal before the Sessions Court in accordance with the amended proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and requested to withdraw the present application, with liberty to file such appeal. (2) 3 In view of the said submission, present application stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. 4 However, it is made clear that the aspect of limitation will play its own role and if the applicant prefers any application for delay condonation before the Sessions Court, it shall be decided in accordance with law. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) dbm/crap4184.10