hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE REVIEW PETITION NO. 92 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8481 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra and Ors. .. Petitioners Versus Suhas Sitaram Damdhere and Ors. .. Respondents Smt. Manorama Mohanty i/by Mr. S.K. Srivastava for Petitioners. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, A.G.P. For R. Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : MARCH 08, 2010 P.C. This court had granted ad interim order on 7.9.2006 after hearing the parties. The Petition was admitted on 7.9.2006. Thereafter, an application was moved for vacating that order. This court vide a reasoned order dismissed that application. The Review has been preferred against the said order by application dated 7.6.2008, which has come up for hearing today. We have heard learned A.G.P. appearing for the Sate. We find that the Petitioners have filed objections on 1.7.2005. There is nothing on record to show that the Petitioners were given personal hearing. Even otherwise, this court has permitted the respondent State to proceed with the acquisition proceedings. In the light of that, in our opinion, no case made out for review. Application for review rejected. (D.G. KARNIK,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)