SSK/912 1 WP/4103.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4103 OF 2011 Shri Babu @ Maruti Dattu Shelke ....Petitioner Versus The State of Maharshtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Pradeep Gole, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. Molina Thakur, AGP for the State. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & RANJIT MORE, JJ. DATED : 24TH JUNE, 2011. P.C.: We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. We have also heard learned AGP for the State. 2. Learned AGP has drawn our attention to the affidavit of Mr.Dattu Ramdas Navale, District Rehabilitation Officer, Satara. Paragraph 4 thereof reads as under : “4. Subsequently, this respondent addressed a letter to the respondent no.5 calling upon respondent no.5 to initiate action in accordance with law. I say that this respondents shall reconsider the partition as set out in R.C.S.No.231/1939. The official note dated 15.6.2011 has got approved from Collector, Satara. The proposal to SSK/912 2 WP/4103.11 reconsider the partition set out in R.C.S.No.231/1939 for fixing the slab was sent to Divisional Commissioner, Pune by letter No.Punarva/Urmodi/Kavi-511 dated 15.06.2011 of this office. I say that this office will strictly follow the order of this Hon’ble Court dated 1.2.2005. The petitioner will be heard while deciding the matter, complying the order of this Hon’ble High Court dated 01.02.2005.” In view of the affirmative statement made by the District Rehabilitation Officer, Satara that the Order dated 1st February, 2005 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.1225 of 2004 will be strictly complied with, in our opinion, the petition has worked itself out. The petition is disposed of accordingly. (RANJIT MORE, J.) (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)