IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 4TH JULY 2011 / 13TH ASHADHA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 585 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.30613/2008 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C): ---------------------------------------------------- RANJINI P.H.S.A(HINDI) NAMHS,PERINGATHUR, THALASSRY ,KANNUR DISTRICT R/A.PANICHINCANDAVIDA HOUSE, ANIYARAM P.O., VIA CHOKLI, KANNUR DISTRICT.PIN-670672 BY ADV. SMT.JAYASREE MANOJ RESPONDENT/4TH RESPONDENT IN W.P.(C): --------------------------------------------------------------- E.P.DHANOOJA, AGED 52 YEARS, W/O.KARUNAKARAN, P.A.TO DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THALASSERY, KANNUR DIST, IN FULL CHARGE OF DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,THALASSERY,AND RESIDING AT PANNIANKANDY HOUSE, P.O.KOLACHEERY,KANNUR DIST-640601 BY GOVT.PLEADER SHR V.VIJULAL THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN COC.585/11 PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE 1 : Certified copy of the judgment in W.P.(C)No.30613/08 dt.3.2.11 of this court. ANNEXURE 2 : Copy of the letter dt.13.3.2011. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE dsn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------- Contempt Case(C)No.585 Of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JULY, 2011 J U D G M E N T The learned Government Pleader brought to my notice a communication from the District Educational Officer dated 17.6.2011 stating that the appointment of the petitioner for the period from 13.8.2004 to 31.3.2005 has been approved on daily wage basis and from 1.6.2005 on regular basis. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Manager has already taken up the matter with the District Educational Officer for approval on regular basis, the period from 13.8.2004 to 31.3.2005. If the petitioner has got any grievance in the matter, she can also take up the matter with the appropriate authorities. Leaving open the said remedy, the Contempt of Court Case is closed. SD/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn