IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11285 of 2009 RAM PUKAR MAHTO, son of Late Baue Lal Mahto, resident of Mohalla- Mahadev Math, Ward No.1, P.S. Rosera, District Samastipur. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Minor Irrigation, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Executive Engineer, Tubewell Division, Madhepura. 3. Director, Provident Fund, Patna. 4. The District Provident Fund Officer, Madhepura. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 01.09.2009 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary corrections in paragraphs 1 and 6 of the writ application. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has not been paid the full amount of provident fund. According to the petitioner, the provident fund amount would be more than Rs.5,00,000/- whereas he has been paid a sum of Rs.3,26,000/- and odd as per the sanction order issued by the District Provident Fund Officer, Madhepura on 6.8.2008, as contained in Annexure 4. The learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the amount claimed by the petitioner needs to be verified. However, he submits that in case the petitioner files fresh representation stating the details of his claims before the authorities concerned, the same would be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, 2 as raised in the writ application, the petitioner proposes to file fresh representation before the Executive Engineer, Tubewell Division, Madhepura (respondent no.2) and the Director, Provident Fund, Patna (respondent no.3) separately. In case such representations are filed stating the details of the claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the respondents no.2 and 3 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner could be redressed without delay and the admissible payment with statutory interest will be made. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)