IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26783 of 2008 ANIL SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 03.09.2008 Heard. The rejection order speaks that the petitioner was making calls for certain payment of ransom money by a particular mobile number. Some paragraphs of the case diary were also referred in the rejection order. However, after perusing the relevant paragraphs of the case diary what came out is that the mobile number by which the calls were received by the informant, was completely different from that which has been mentioned in the rejection order. Besides, whatever material appears against the petitioner that is not acceptable for drawing an inference of participation in any manner in the occurrence. Let petitioner Anil Singh be released from custody on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. III, Rohtas in Sessions Trial No. 310 of 2008 arising out of Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 50 of 2003. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J)