IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18350 of 2011 Chhabila Ram, Son of Ram Lal Ram, Resident of Village – Laxmanpur Milki, P.O. – Narhana Gopalpur, P.S. – Bihta, District – Patna. --------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Treasury Officer, Patna. 4. The Registrar, Registry Office, Patna. 5. The Additional Registrar, Barh, District – Patna. 6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 7. The State Bank of India through the Regional Manager, Regional Administration, Patna. 8. The Regional Manager Reason / Administration State Bank of India, Patna. ---------- Respondents ---------------------------------- 2 18.10.2011 Heard Sri Binod Murari Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Harish Singh, learned A.C. to Government Pleader No. 20, who appears on behalf of respondent /State and learning counsel appearing on behalf of respondent/Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. The petitioner, who retired as Class IV employee from Registry Office, Barh, has prayed for directing the respondents to revise his pension. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after retirement all the retiral dues have been paid to the petitioner but pension of the petitioner has not been revised. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner may be granted liberty to approach the authority concerned for the relief sought for in the present writ petition. In view of prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file representation for the relief sought for in the 2 present writ petition before respondent no. 6 /Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. If such representation is filed, the court expects that the respondent Accountant General, Bihar, Patna, will examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. If he considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to issue authorization in accordance with law within aforesaid time. The writ petition stands disposed of. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)