IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 22t DAY OF JULY, 20 I BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JL T STICE B.V.PINTO CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1O7i6fOi1 BETWEEN: Sn. Virupaxayva a, Irriyya S/o. Daanavva Mathad Age: 29 years, 0cc: ?griculturist R/o. Bandigani, Taluk: Jamkhandi Dist. Bagalkot 2 Sri, Prahhu S/ o. Hanamanth 1hambur Age: 30 years, 0cc: Agriculturist R/o. Marapur. Tq: Mudhol Dist. Bagaikot PETITIONERS Bv Shri A. R. Patil, AcIv.) AND: The State of IKarnataka R/b’v SPP B\ Banahatti Police Station RESPONDENT (B Shri Anand 1K. Navalgimag’th, HCGP> C -2- This criminal petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C seeking to enlarge the petitioners-accused on bail in the Banahatti P.S.Crime No.148/2010 for the offences p/u/s. 143, 147, 148, 341 and 302 R/w 149 of IPC. This criminal petition coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following: - ORDER This petition is filed seeking for bail in Crime No.148/20 10 of Banahatti Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341 arid 302 read with Section 149 of TPC, on the basis of the complaint of one Smt. Shivaleela Balaram Sharma. 2. In the complaint it is stated that she has married the deceased Balaram Sharma after loving him. The accused No.1 being the brother of the complainant and the accused No.2 being the friend of accused No. I are alleged to have a grudge against the deceased for having married the complainant. It is the case of the complainant that on 04.11 .20 10. at about 7.30 pm. the petitioner along with two others have committed the F 1 murder of the deceased b means of deadly eapnns and that the said information “as given to the complainant by one Rudrappa Kittur. 3. The prosecution has filed the charge sheet against the accused shosing CWs 6 to 10 as the eyewitnesses. On a perusal of the statement of et e witnesses. it is clear that the accused have committed the murder of the deceased and the offences fall square within the purview of Section 302 of IPC which punishable with the death or imprisonment of life. It is further seen that the murder is pre planned and motive is clear. 1 am of the opinion that the petitioner is not entitled for bail. The petition is dismissed. Sd? JUDGE gab