IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35908 of 2008 1. RAM SEWAK SINGH, son of late Suraj Singh @ Suraj Narain Singh 2. RAJIV SINGH, son of Arbind Singh Both residents of Village – Sakh Mohan, P.S. Bibhutipur, District – Samastipur ____________ PETITIOENRS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR________OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 02. 30.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. Petitioners have been named as one of the prime accused in the FIR in Bibhutipur P. S. Case No. 101 of 2003 under several sections of the Indian Penal Code including 302 and 27 of the Arms Act. Submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners is that though their names figure in the FIR but no overt act has been alleged against them. Not only this, similarly situated accused persons have been enlarged on bail by the High Court. The case of the petitioners is no different. In fact, case of petitioner No.1 is on better footing because he was hospitalized on the date concerned. These are matters to be decided during the trial but in the totality of the facts mentioned above, let the petitioners Ram Sewak Singh and Rajiv Singh be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20, 000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A C J M, Rosera, Samastipur, in Bibhutipur P S Case No. 101 of 2003. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)