IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.35825 of 2009 LAXMAN CHAUDHARY @ LAXAMAN CHOUDHARY, S/O- SHATRUGHAN MAHTO @ SHATRUGHAN CHAUDHARY, R/O VILL- MAHESHPUR, P.S- PEAR, DISTT- MUZAFFARPUR …………………………………………………..…. PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ………………… OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner:- Mr. K.N. Diwakar, Advocate. For the State:- Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 4. 11.12.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Perused the report with regard to antecedents of the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is not named in the first information report. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he has not been put on T.I. Parade though he is in custody since 25.10.2008. Petitioner’s name has surfaced only on the basis of suspicion. Learned counsel for the State submitted that apart from this case, petitioner is also accused in other cases. Having regard to the facts and circumstances 2 of the case, I direct the petitioner, namely, Laxman Chaudhary @ Laxaman Choudhary to be released on bail on his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Pankaj Mishra, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 115/08, Tr. No. 3459/09, subject to the condition that one of the bailors must be either of the parents of the petitioner, who shall swear an affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy showing his relationship with the petitioner. It is also made clear that if the petitioner, after his release in this case, again involves himself in a criminal case of similar nature, it would be open for the concerned court to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds of the petitioner. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )