•linniiBiE.. • •} c ,^' ^ ^p ^ IN THEJ-UGHCOUmLQF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. No.'^"/2001 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF PETITIONER/ RESPONDENATS CONSTITUTION OF INDIA - Smt. Sunita Singh W/o Shri R.K. Singh aged 45 years R/o Bhadara Para, Balco Nagar, Korba Distt. Korba (C.G.) Vs 1^-^State of Chhattisgarh Through •?The Secretary, Revenue Department Raipur. The Collector, Korba (C.G.) The Nayab Tahsildar Korba (C.G.) Shri Chandra Kumar Vei'ma Age 35 years Ward Member No.31 Korba (C.G.) Shri Babulal Maitri, Patwari Halka No. 3, Korba (C.G.) Shri R.K. Singh, aged 50 years S/o Shri L.N. Singh Village Padimar Korba (C.G.) 6 Bfe^I^»: !lBifll:,."i'. •!liB-8e-22- Bll aw Q an^it^if.-. R-ii?b;3II^T sh*ffct) yfifl :;i;lt^lj -».; ^^^tfflc-w^wft'H'is.'Rflwfy' NIHWI »Wqi 'l .L^I^^ 200 STI^I •TOISR'glSit .thjaf aflsres '19-3-2004; :::^:: :^''''••.: •:.:, ^l. Shri S.K. Beriwal, counsel] Shri S.C. Verma; Panel Shri H.S. Pa.tel, counsel fo'j Shri Saryay;K. Agrawal, The pelitioner has prefetT^c of the i eonstitution 6f India bein^ 'passed. by respohdent No.3, No.llO/A-68/98-99. The pefitioners case is Khasra No.l36/2g, area 0,11 and Disfrict Korba. The the said Khasra. Nuniber' an3| occupafiQn of the said land. Annexyi-e-J?/!; The land Beann^' Qovemihent laii3 and reeorded a8" i& .shoivn unauthorized possej AnnexureP/2. ^' • ' The respondent No.3 initia|t Madhya Pradesh -Land Revenue petitioner/resporident No.6 on constructed a house, aangan 0.08 acres which is part of Khasi|a 98 was registered'by the Naib passed by respondent No.3 impij)s No.6, which came^to be deposite<P P/3. ' ' |fQr'lHe petifioner.! .; . " ' ' La'lvyer.fyr resporidents :1 to :3. resportdent Np.4. ':';. : / • ' . '• ' ' ccjunsel fbr the;mteFvener. ; " • • ~ !d 'this peiition under Artieles 225/227 a.ggrieved'by'tlie'Qrderdate(i^'9-6-20Cl'l ;Bie 'Naib TefasLldar^ iri Tevenue 'caSe petiticff^er G°N? <^ 1^(yl<4l^^IH^^ fsl^i •l.pt).'(-$i< ^siPtra^ she-is ths owner bf tfie^anfS Ifcearinj sifufifed at village I'a.diBiar, Tehsil. \,;^.;.'..,^ :;,...:.'^'','.: Kas. constructed £>ouhdaTy5walt°over ,she' is • ih. ''peaceiul' possesslon-' arui bf Bhu-Adhikar Avain Rin-E'ustika is- :EHasTa::N&.:1136/l^'iarea; ^5Q.;'acres'~ts^ s forest.of big trees in which 0.08 acres ision bf respondent N0*6, which is ^ ' 'f.ed prooeedihg u.nder Section 248 of the ;ode, 1959 againsf fhe husband ofthe : allegations that he has unautKorizedly ^arden oq the govemment land area. No. 136/1. A revenue ease^No.6A/97- •, Korba. On 5-5-98, an orderwas a fine of Rs.200/- ori i-espondent by respondent No,6,as ger Annexure- th^: arid TeDisildar impi)>sini :i;3iS -N'l ;l:--i?l i^BI[jr!llte^;3fe:^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^®^ %^l@I^^jl@iill^^ i^:ilii:;?'i"i'^: ^i^:';^;^^%^^%i^^%^^^^^^^^^^^s^%^^^^^^^^^^^^@%^?-^tl^^^^ \^-'^;.'.J:i;.-:..^T3ii%§i^?t%^^ ^:''1' , •,' • •••:''1:^ ,^': flllw j;?EI-HC-2^ "as^ tl;'58B !]@l!;;i|c SD^T^T : h-U'h Sf^f *-(;fT^'^^Cl w's 3^T 1T5N? intR-Trshliqi 'WI, 200. l^re^ff' 3n^?i.;Bngt ^ffa -z— dedided The Naib Tehsildar again instffirfed a separate'pi-oceedin^ Pradesh Lan^ Revenue Code, 19; on the allegafion that he has :£JE Khasra No.136/1 and constFuctJE case No.llOA/'68/98-99 was of constryction bver Khasra Nb.l: 'was imposed end' fhat-aB'iount ^ P^5. And -fhe pUofographs' we;|i 'p/ll.\ :;..': . ' "' :'. -• Now, • the respondeiits dispossess the petitioner from 0.11 acres undgr the earb of Nd,6. - Show cause Tiotlce wa&issh-i* in the ^name of 'respon<ient consfmctions. Ori 21-12-2000,' Pafwari, Muriicipat Gorporatipn, ^ .men-tbers wOrfced .out .resportdeBt 'No. 1 was;ac]^ .able Panchanama was^^repared-as p6i). The fUFthwlcase of 'tKe. the ericroachment the ^espondetit peaceful possessionof the are demolishing the cionstruct consfru'cted after getting the Korba. jijipoffi irisfigafed fcy r^poridents 4 'and 5. ;uri<ier~'Seclion 248 oT .:fhe' Madhya )9 against the hysbaiid ofthe petitioner 'ctipied the Govemment .land bearing id a hoyse and garden. ' The revenue on 14-6-99 andL Qrder fbi- removal |36/1 was passed aridfine,of.Rs. 50Q/- \as cieposited, as {>§rAiinexures-P/4 & |e •tafeen.which are^ ftnnexures-P/6 t6 hdr issluea flhe measurenlient €> 'bWts't'ifl-l *fl*l?il'^'fe'st<Io|.<^K 'iT-gPgifan^r1.' ;^'' 4nauthdrizedly and .'illegally -wanf to land bearing Khasra No,136/2g, area r^moving encroachments of respondent by'the respondehts on 15-1;2-20QQ. N0,6 • tot remove the uriautlidrized^ Revenue InspeGtor along with: Halka Kofwar bf the village Padimar ajad ward of Khasra.No. 136/1.. .fioweyer, give^ ariy'written Beport. -•1'1'ierefore, (•.^nnexuFe-p^'16. .:. •:y^r-"'-'''K^:s^/:^ ^' ^ia,;that iil the^garb of removtrfg^ :sjare."interfering witli the legal and tk.v^.^--__ :__. ^_..'_ ::.'. •1 a^ Khasra No. t36/2g and tfaey :^ion bf the petitidner, whictl was per^nissiori of the Municipal Corporafion, S ^^?1]1a '[1TBSfo<i XI-HC-22 sn^i'^t Krti* ant?r ?h^ ^ii^ •s,^ ~S:Sl"tiMWi, 'SSIWW, 'WRtTWdraii "^ 200 l^ff' SB^T'TOIIW'Sfi^ Gtl ttot tresbassed Retum has '-been: BIed categorical reply is tfaal-ttiey are. on Khasra? No; I36/2g. 'But fhe construction which is staBding onl 1/. removingwhereas,thepetitioner's ~ of Khasra No. 136/2g. ' I have heard^the leamed records. ,"-:, ' .. • • : ':... The Tnain dispute ^between| . claimihg, that^ she .is in posse^i^ .No.l36/2g and she has riot bearing Khasra No;136/.l where^s petitiorier's husban9 has trespass| land bearing Ktiasra 'No. 136/1,) encroachnient of the petitioner's[ N6.136/1andnot the petitioner. : Iri view of th&abeive disputep- are remdving the •eHcroachrrierrt] No. 136/1 i.e.^Goverri'menf'lahd oi-l 'petitioner, whicK is. esdsting on, map on:the reGord.wheyeSy this ,whether ^particular yisputed No. 136/2g:QT Khasra.Np;136y' l' j';/, . :. ..'••' '••'•'"; Thes6 disputed.questitins; Qpmmissioner under Qrder 26 Rul •fhese disputgd :questiQns GaQnot: this^ I ain fbrtified iri nay view by port|o t9e ^p)fepft:tI(rt^'?'fetA <&I<<K i.'^afsfHsii^r- ^..,. .behalf; .of respolldents in;: which dispufirig the litlgolthe petitibner •(3ase of the::responderits is that the the part of Khasra Nd. 13.6/1 theyare |confention is thatsbe is inpQssession ,.li*^ -i . ; ; . Go^ihsel jor the partiesjand perused the Ihe parties is :that;t]ie petitioner is 'K;-'^f^ ;:" • .:;. -:^^S .'" • ''l'i'~'. .: • ; : ifc)n ;of her .fiwri land heanng.KhaSra or encroacKeiil upon the Jand i, respondents' objection is that the id and tQok irito possessiqn of part of ;:therefore,, they aj« reiiibv^ •husband which' is part of'Khasra •facts; as ta. whether the respondents wtlicl'i is .existing' on , the KKasra jthey. are removiiig .thje eonstTuction •qf I^6/3g;'^There is TiGi|a<imifted/a.greed Qoyrt'ca.TtTeach'tothe.c;onclasion:that 3rt|ioh of .the:,, land falls : 00. the KhasFa. fictvemmenf'land.. ,.':;-•'.,,• ' :. . ;e4n be decided onlyaffier appoiotingthe; !|e,^ot the.GPe.by any,©iyiiCouct.and d^idedj.nthis.wrTt^pefition^and.for tS|e;judgment< of the:H®ri'ble;Apex-Court ean fe <;t>l<<!<'l<:ll-i 'WRlt' i-1®^^R?R ^'^'Srfigtr 3iiS?t : jeaara frstSaS. & Ofs. repbrted in -«JT. tteenKeldtKat:- ^. • ' ,- Wsysyyys'^^^^^^^^^^y^^^yffKs' , siiiw^ f(;-)l°b 3i1^?T in the matter of^SItreepat v.' RS( 2000 (7)SC379iriwliicfa'it?Kas ^"The priacipal contentioEi r^ AppeIIant is ,that thougl? ,tt| regard" to, the identity of tl-j lahd ip dispute formed parjj . No.257/;I,, the; coyrts be| esta.bUshed and decreed tU on the basis of oral evi3ent the purpose 6f establishi^ dispute af the-spBt. In OUT opinion, this there was a serious di;spu| boundaries of the land in to ifs identity,' the courts sbould have got the idei} survey commission to loc4 out; whether: it formed part| No.257^1.'. . ' In fhe. preseiif ease, simi'tail' and the respondents to the effect) land fatls under Khasra No. 136/2[ disputed question e.an only be de4 ^ .Le^med counselforthepetj disposed of-^Ut^jthe petitioner-ha^ fu'ne sfae will approach fhe Givfl jused by-learrled Courisel for.the .ttliere was 'a serious dispute with (e lahd in dispute,,wltether the ^ofXhasra No.257/3^01; Khasra IQW^ did .npt get. fKe ideatity le suit, of the Respoiadent only :e whiei'j.was not suB'iaent for ijig' ;the. identity of the land in contention is correct. Since te with regard to the area arid lUestion, especially with regard Ijielow, Befere deGreeing'tbe suit established by.issuing.a |te tlie plot in; disjai.tfe 'and find- [ of Khasra- NQ.257/3;or Khasra ideiltity dispute exists between the petitioner that whether the particular disputed or Khasra No. I36/1. Therefore, tbis ided by thq.CiyiI Court,, , '' : . /-.iit- t- . '' tionei- submits thatfthewrit pefitibn is reasGnable apprehension that by the Court; for obtaining the order, the t ^[•tfc :f:a ::]M ii;aa ws X&HC-22 ^;. ;•: • ^^'^a^^B^.^"^^^^ -3ttf:-i1 l'?ll<"!1,"^ttt'9<1^,^ '"^(3RS.^: S:m-^ .tdXCTifliHtq);""""""" '""""'"^"'^S'H^rli2W.: ,^^^?':%^'^^^':iE^S.-K-:;";l:';'^'?"B^'^^'^•:i^ife:l? ailSB^it (cHi?t"3tlS?f ^Rt^^lfl^; .respiandeBts will.demolish:the;existir| the petitioner's-lftnd wifhin her owri, ^ The recjuest, made, by' the' I) appears to.be reasonafcile^.and.fair:'' to the petitioner to- approsGfa;the;cJ|< ,drders; if so. desires and ad^sed. • T[ •maintain the sfatus;quo'as existed oj %fith the' direcfiori^'aiM. stands disposedpf.^^ : . • ^ Parties'are entifled fbr.certlfiect cti, E'Hfo^lE't •RiN^f'^^f^1^'!^!'^^ i73»Pa43»^wi" •.'i./: .eonstructipii.whicK^s'exisfihg^on li^'it.'.^.y • . ^;.',:' : ',;l','%"r': tamed 'eounsel .fbr the petitioner i, foyr wfeeks ,fime is allowed. vil iCQlirfe fbr obtaining appropriate; ly'thenjTegporiderttsare-direqted^Q' Fl'today. : .':: :i^:::'!,:, ; ! •' ; ; :': .aferesaid^ti'te 3f?ri£\petitrori; ib TOeEefoi'e, cilvil otiseih?ations G0pp'of fhis, @rder< ; •y—i Sd/-r L.C. Bhadoo Judge