IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 21ST AUGUST 2008 / 30TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 23505 of 2008(W) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ K.SASIDHARAN NAIR, ( CONDUCTOR, PAPPANAMCODE DEPOT. RTD. 31.3.2007), PALAYATHUVILA VEEDU, 'AVANAVANCHERRY PO., ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. KSRTC, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KSRTC, PAPPANAMCODE DEPOT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. EDAKKODE SERVICE CO.OP.BANK REP. BY ITS MANAGER, AVANAVANCHERRY TOLL BRANCH ELAMBA PO., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SHRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN, SC, KSRTC FOR R1 & 2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/08/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.C. NO. 23505 OF 2008 W -------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st August, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner retired from the service of the respondent Corporation while working as Conductor on 31.3.2007. Alleging that he has received Ext.P2 notice from the third respondent Bank in connection with the loan taken by him, petitioner seeks out of turn payment of his pensionary benefits. Learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Corporation points out that Ext.P2 is only a notice. As far as Ext.P3 Judgment is concerned, that was a case where the proceedings were taken under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act and it may not strictly apply in the case of the petitioner. In such circumstances, I feel that I need not interfere at this stage. But, I feel that if the petitioner represents the matter before the first respondent, the first respondent can take a decision in the matter. Counsel for petitioner submits that WPC. 23505/08 W 2 unless some relief is granted, proceedings will be taken against the sureties. Therefore, I direct that if the petitioner represents the matter before the first respondent, the first respondent shall take a decision in the matter in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of the representation. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/= K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy// PS to Judge