FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2457/2009 (Dadabhau Vs. The State) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.N.K.Kakade, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. P.M.Shinde, APP for the respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 29/7/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard learned Counsel for the accused/applicant extensively. 2. In an incident dt.28.5.2009, at 12.30 behind backside of the complainants house, he was allegedly assaulted, robbed by nine persons in which present applicant/accused was alleged to be possessing a sword and allegedly dealt blows of sword. The Counsel minutely took me to the events as to how the incident, in fact, could not have taken place, as to how the complainant though was aware of facilities at Hospital 4 kms away at Parner, where Police Station is also located, went for treatment at a distance of 50 kms from the village, by travelling via Parner. The hospital, according to the Counsel, is of his friend. It is informed, nothing is to be recovered from him as allegedly there is recovery of the sword at the behest of the accused/applicant.// At this stage of the matter, there cannot be a minute dissection of the details as canvassed by the Counsel but the fact remains that the accused/applicant is in custody since last nearly two months. The certification produced by the Counsel informs that he was discharged from the hospital on 26.6.2009, however, the statement before the learned Sessions Court was made at the time of the order dt.4.7.2009 that he was still in hospital. 3. The mobile number which is given by the complainant as per the investigation papers appears from the State of Tamilnadu, the details are yet to be recovered, including the incoming and outgoing calls for which custody of the accused is not desired. The accused hails from the same village. The accused has made out a case for bail. Hence order. (a) The applicants/accused ( (1) Dadabhau s/o Rambhau Pujari, (2) Balu s/o Tabaji Borude, (3) Bhairu s/o Genu Pujari be released on their furnishing P.R. bond and surety in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- each in Crime No.I-182/2009, registered at Parner Police Station. (b) After their release, the accused/applicant nos. 1 and 2 ( Dadabhau s/o Rambhau Pujari and Balu s/o Tabaji Borude), they shall reside at City Ahmednagar and shall be reporting at Taluka Police Station at Ahmednagar, on every Sunday, between 9 to 3 p.m. They will give their changed address to investigating officer in Crime No.I.182/2009, including their contact telephone numbers. c) The accused/applicants shall attend the investigating officer whenever so required irrespective of the above terms of stay at Ahmednagar. d) The accused applicants No. 1 and 2 shall not leave the Ahmednagar district for a period of one year or till filing of the chargesheet. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/crapln2457-09