IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4708 of 2009 KAMALA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.05.2009 No body appears on behalf of the petitioner. Counsel for the State is present. The petitioner, who is father-in-law of the victim(deceased), has approached this Court for grant of anticipatory bail in a case instituted under section 304B/34 IPC and section ¾ of the Dowry prohibition Act. The allegation in the FIR is that within a year of marriage, the victim(niece of the informant) was done to death in the matrimonial home in a very suspicious circumstance. It appears that the victim was set on fire leading to her death. It is stated that the petitioner was not present at the house when the incident took place. It is further stated that it was a case of accidental fire and/or suicide. This Court finds from the impugned order that in course of investigation, several witnesses have supported the prosecution case. The supervising authority has also found the case true against the petitioner. Having regard to the allegations and the materials available on record, this Court is satisfied that no good case for extension of privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is made out. The application is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )