Petmoner Versus Respondents 1. Mo l > r V ‘ y ‘ Hig-tj QOURT OF CHHATT!$GAR!;£ &T BILASEUR Writ Petifion {5) N6, 13%3 9f 2008 Mithl‘esh Kumar Pandey, son of ‘ Vishrhudev Pandey, aged about ,47 yeare residence of Kailash Mod Satipé‘ra, Ambikapur, District- Sargeja: Chhétisgarh. State 0f Chhattisgarh. Through Secretary, Water Resources Department. DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (£16.) Chief Engineer. Water Resource Department, Hasdeo Basin, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Learned counset appearing for the petitioner, on instructions. submits that the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation. He prays that the concerned authority be directed to consider and decide the representation in accordance with raw, within stipulated period. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above-stated iiberty. The concerned authority shaii consider and decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law. expeditiously. 1 ' 3d]— r’ Satish K. Agnihotri V r , V Judge r Thakur Shri C. Jayant K. R30, Advocate for the petitioner. shri U. N. S. Deo. Govt. Advocate for the respondents: WBIT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLR 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION 6F INDIAL Singie Bench : Hon'bie Mr. SatiSh K. Agnihotri, J. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 3m day of March. 2008)