: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.70 OF 2004 M/s.Saurashta Chemicals Ltd. ....Plaintiff V/s. M/s.Mehta Sulpites (I) Ltd. ....Defendant Ms.Payal Gandhi i/ M/s.Shah & Singhvi for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 17TH JANUARY, 2008. P.C. : 1. The suit is filed to recover the price of the goods sold and delivered by the Plaintiff to the Defendant. No appearance has been filed. No written statement has been filed. 2. The Plaintiff has filed a compilation of documents which are taken on record and marked Exhibit "A" collectively. 3. The sale of the said goods was on the terms contained in and evidenced by the invoices. The invoices also stipulate the interest at 21% p.a. : 2 : 4. There is no reply to the Plaintiff’s advocates notice demanding payment. There is noting on record that militates against the Plaintiff’s claim. The averments and submissions contained in the plaint and the record clearly establishes the Plaintiff’s claim. 5. In the circumstances, the suit is decreed as prayed. Refund as per rules.