IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Stay Vacation App. No. 8611/2008 In Criminal Writ Petition No. 940 of 2008 Smt. Madhu Gupta & another. .... Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. .... Respondents Mr. R.K. Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. R.K. Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against petitioner no. 1 before the circle officer concerned on 06.01.2009 and the same is likely to be submitted before the court concerned in the near future but petitioner no. 2 has not been chargesheeted as during the investigation no prima facie evidence has been collected against her. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently the stay vacation application stands disposed of accordingly. 4. Interim order dated 26.11.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet/final report before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 26.03.2009 V.K.