IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1930 R.P.No. 988 of 2008 ------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.16870/2008 Dated 04/07/2008 ................................ REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS: ------------------------------------------- 1. V.C.THOMAS, VALAVARA KADUPPIL MEENADOM PO., KOTTAYAM. 2. V.C.PHILIP,VALAVARA KADUPPIL MEENADOM PO., KOTTAYAM. 3. K.P.MONICHAN, KOORAKKATT, MEENADOM PO., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM. 3. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. MEENADOM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MEENADOM, KOTTAYAM. 5. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS KOTTAYAM. 6. DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, KOTTAYAM. R.P.NO. 988/2008 7. JOYCE SKARIAH, VAYALILKOLLATTU, MEENADOM, KOTTAYAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. T.T. MOHAMMED ADV. M.K. CHANDRA MOHAN DAS, SC FOR PCB THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== R.P.No.988 OF 2008 IN W.P.(C) NO. 16870 OF 2008 (G) ==================== Dated this the 4th day of November, 2008 O R D E R Heard. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioners is only regarding the finding in para 5 of the judgment upholding the validity of Exts.P1 to P4. It is stated that in view of the findings in the judgment, the remedies available to the petitioner against these orders are foreclosed. Considering this submission, it is clarified that the findings in regard to Exts. P1 to P4 mentioned in para 5 of the judgment are based on the materials produced in the writ petition and that these findings will not cause prejudice to the petitioners if they are pursuing their remedies against the said orders. It is clarified that if the petitioners challenge the said orders before any appropriate forum, the same shall be decided untramelled by what is stated in para 5 of the judgment. The judgment is clarified as above and the review is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp