IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.23139 of 2010 Date of Decision : December 23, 2010. M/s Yogesh Jewellers .....Petitioner versus Central Bank of India and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Manoj Kumar Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct the respondent- bank to settle its account under the One Time Settlement Scheme. It is averred that the petitioner has already deposited a sum of Rs.11,50,000/- in its loan account of overdraft facilities and is further willing to pay Rs.7 lacs more. It is also averred that the offer made by the petitioner is consistent and in conformity with the One Time Settlement Scheme launched by the respondent bank. However, no decision on the offer made by the petitioner is being taken despite the recommendation made by the Branch Manager of the bank. The petitioner has also served the respondents with a legal notice dated 21.10.2010 (Annexure P-4) but there is no response thereto so far. C.W.P.No .23139 of 2010 2 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the fact that the offer made by the petitioner for One Time Settlement is stated to be as per the One Time Settlement Scheme launched by the respondent bank, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1-bank to take a final decision on the offer made by the petitioner under the One Time Settlement Scheme and convey its decision within a period of one month from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Dasti. December 23, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE