In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-18350 of 2009 (O&M) Tarsem Singh and others ..... Petitioners vs State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. D. S. Sidhu, Advocate for Mr. N. S. Sodhi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Rajesh Bindal J. The petitioners have approached this court for protection of their life and liberty and also seeking an advance notice of 7 days in case they are sought to be arrested in any case registered on account of matrimonial dispute between petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 6. Apprehension of arrest is there on account of the fact that father of the girl is a Deputy Superintendent of Police in Punjab Police. The marriage of petitioner no. 1 was solemnised with respondent no. 6 on 24.10.2004, but due to differences, both are residing separate since the end of year 2007. Presently a complaint filed by respondent no. 4, father of respondent no. 6, against the petitioners is under investigation. As far as the joining of the petitioners in investigation being carried out on the complaint of respondent no. 4 is concerned, no exception can be taken to the same, however, it is directed that in case after investigation any case is registered on account of matrimonial dispute between petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 6, and the petitioners are sought to be arrested therein, three days advance notice be given to them before their arrest. Disposed of. 6.8.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge