: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.310 OF 2008 Mrs.Alka Goyal & Ors. ....Appellants V/s. Tukaram Genuji Kawade & Ors. ....Respondents Mrs.Anita A. Agarwal for the Appellants. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 2ND APRIL, 2008. P.C. : 1. The impugned order warrants no interference. Defendant Nos.4 to 7 have taken out an application for injunction in the Plaintiff’s suit. The Plaintiff has sought a declaration that the documents executed in favour of Defendant No.1 are void. The Appellants are Defendant Nos.4 to 7 who claim to have acquired an interest to a part of the property pursuant to the documents executed by Defendant No.1 in their favour as power of attorney holder. 2. There are several issues which will arise between the Plaintiff and Defendant Nos.4 to 7. If the rights of Defendant Nos.4 to 7 under the alleged : 2 : agreement are affected, it would be necessary for Defendant Nos.4 to 7 to adopt independent proceedings for establishing the same. 3. With the aforesaid clarification the Appeal from Order is dismissed.