IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO : 10239 of 2001 Between: 1 Karodi Ramana Reddy S/o Venkataswamy Reddy Peyyalapalem Village, Kondavalur Mandal, Nellore Dist. 2 Karodi Pulla Reddy S/o Venkata Reddy Peyyalapalem Village, Kondavalur Mandal, Nellore Dist. 3 Karodi Kameswaramma S/o Harzarath Reddy Peyyalapalem Village, Kondavalur Mandal, Nellore Dist. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Joint Collector, Nellore Dist. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Dagadarthi Mandal, Nellore Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of mandamus declare the action of the R2 in seeking to dispossess the petitioners from an extent of Acs.75.79 1/2 cents in old Sy No.43/4 & 43/6 of Uchaguntapalem Village, Dagadarthi mandal, Nellore Dist & also refusing to furnish the copies of the fair adangal register, 10 (1) adangal & procd of the Settlement Officer in L.Dis.No.1038/70 as illegal, arbitrary & unjust by issuing an appropriate writ or direction Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.V.S.SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VEENA} HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR W.P.No.10239 of 2001 ORDER: After arguing the matter at length, the learned counsel for the petitioners fairly concedes that several disputed questions of fact would now fall for consideration including the dispute as to whether the petitioners had notice of the order dated 31-12-1968, passed by the Estate Abolition Tribunal, Nellore, and knowledge thereof, as alleged in the counter affidavit. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition to enable the petitioners to take up appropriate legal proceedings as advised in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________________ 6th February 2009 KVR