IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 169 (S/B) of 2007 Old No. 7786 of 1998 Union of India & others … Petitioners Versus Central Administrative Tribunal & others. … Respondents Sri Pradeep Joshi, Standing Counsel (Central Govt.) for petitioners Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and gone though the impugned judgment. On careful perusal of the impugned judgment we find that the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad vide detailed order by adopting elaborate reasoning had allowed the Original Application filed by respondent no. 2 by directing the petitioners to issue order for the grant of Training Allowance to this respondent in terms of Memorandum issued by the petitioners which was annexed with Original Application. For coming to this conclusion the learned Tribunal was influenced by the fact that respondent no. 2 was performing such duties which entitled him to be granted the Training Allowance because such duties was instructional in nature. Even though he was appointed as a Medic Constable in the office of Divisional Organizer, North Bengal Division, Siliguri (S.S.B.), because of dearth of Instructors, from Siliguri he was transferred to Frontier Academy, S.S.B., Gwaldam, in the then State of U.P. which is now a part of the State of Uttarakhand. We feel that the Tribunal was perfectly justified in granting the aforesaid relief. Apparently, respondent no. 2 has retired in the meanwhile. The petition is dismissed. (B.C.Kandpal, J.) (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 14.05.2008 SP