1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION (LODG.) NO. 136 OF 2009 Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Ashok Hari Patil & Anr. ...Respondents. Ms. Priya Crasto for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 12TH JUNE, 2009. P.C.- 1. By order dated 24th March, 2009, this Court has already granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) with further notice to dispose of the matter finally. Though served, none appeared for the Respondents. 2. Considering the averments made and as there is no denial to the same, therefore, as the Respondents have defaulted to pay the 2 installments though agreed, it is a fit case to grant relief as prayed in terms of prayer clause (c). Prayer clause (c) reads as under:- “(c) That this Honourable Court be pleased to appoint Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay as the Receiver of the said vehicle TATA TRUCK 1510 1613 2213 2516 bearing Registration No. MH-06-K-3036 with all powers under Order XL Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure including the power to take possession of the said vehicle and sell the same and to deposit the proceeds of the said vehicle in this Honourable Court on such terms and conditions as this Honourable Court deems fit and proper.” 3. Resultantly, the present Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (c) with liberty. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)