é. bég @{k $§m§s gm}: IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(S) No. El 5/ ? (2009 pETITmNERs ; 1. /Smt. Archna Tirki, W/o Manoj Tirki, aged about 29 years, Resident of Village —Aour1'jor, Village Panchayat~ Haradand, Tahsil- Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 2./ Smt. Bindabati Bai, W/o \Kamleshwar Ram, aged about 32 years, R/o Village Samarkona, Village Panchayat — Bhadri, Tahsil- Kunkuri, Distt. - Jashpur (C.G.) Smt. Kanta Bai, W/o Manohar Singh, aged about 3O years, R/o r Village ~— Ganjhar, Village Panchayat Bhadri, Tahsil— Kunkuri, Distt. — Jashpur (C.G.) 4. Smt. Abhya Tigga, W/o Rajesh Tigga, aged about 31 years, Resident of Village Pagura, Village Panchayat, Khutgaon, Tahsil~ Kunkuri, Distt. 9’\ ' Jashpur (C.G.) ‘ VERSUS ' / RESPONDENTS : '1. State Of Chhattisgarh Throughw» :L «Then Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development, Department, / D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ' 2. Collector, Jashpur Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 3. Chief Executive Officer, ‘Janpad Panchayat, Kunkuri, / Distt. - Jashpur (C.G.) _4. Project Offlcer, Woman and Child Development Department Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 5. Smt. Jayanti, W/o Benadict Kerketta, aged about 42 years, R/ o Village —Dumart01i, Tahsil- I Kunkuri, Distt. — Jashpur (C.G.) 6. Smt. 'Premshila Panna, W/o Vijay Panna, aged about 32‘ years, R/o Aourijor, Tahsil- .Kunkuri, Distt. (C.G.) 7. Smt. Anita Xalxo, W/o Ranjan Xalxo, aged about 32 years, R/o Village— Bhandari, Tahsil- Kunkuri, Distt. —Jashpur (C: G .) —xJashpur Ca)” M HIGH COURT OF CHHAT'HSGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition gSz No. 7517 of2009 Petitkmers Smt. Archna Tirki & others Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & others (Wn't Petition under Atticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) I (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotli J.) Shri N. K. Chatteijee, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Shri N. N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. Shri C. Jayant K Rao, Advocate and Shri Han'sh Khuntiya, Advocate for the Caveator. ORDERgoral) ( Passed on this 7th day of January, 2010 ) Heard. Leamed counsei appearing for the respondents/State submits that the State of Chhattisgarh, Women and Child Development Department, Raipur has issued instwctions on 2.4.2008 in regard to appointment of Anganwadi Karyakarta Anganbadi Sahayika and Mini Anganbadi Karyakarta. Clause ll oftheabove inStructions provides for appeal. Sub clause (Ka) of Clause 11 ofthe instructions reads as under: 11. arm :— Mew/weeegeeeuemaene %§%enmeetewm$umeemgtn:_ $.WnmmW/%gm%dnr3m‘ W/teggnmeemfa%atr%ma§nenm memwm1993$uwem%. We meanwwn I” 10 In View of the above, learned counsei hppearing for the pet£tioners, on instmctions, seeks permission of this Court to withdrawn this writ petition with liberty to take recourse to the 'altemative forum, in accordance with law. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State has no objection. I In View of the foregoing; the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the above-stated libexty, if so advised. / ~ 77/ /, //SN— 'hotf.‘ \ f‘shK. Agn‘ 1\‘ ::Sa Judge \‘ \ . i