IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5239 of 2011 RANJEET PASWAN @ RANJEET KUMAR PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498(A) of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Though learned counsel for the informant submits that the informant is ready to resume the conjugal life whereas learned counsel for the petitioner submits that divorce case was filed prior to lodging of the present criminal case and on receipt of the notice in divorce case, the present case has been filed. The said contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner has been denied by the learned counsel for the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 1500/- per month to the informant from April, 2011 by depositing the same in the account of the informant in the second week 2 of every month. The aforesaid payment will be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial or maintenance proceedings. Learned counsel for the informant undertakes to supply the account number to the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of ten days. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Sakari P.S. Case No.147 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Madhubani, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)