IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-33060 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 25, 2009 Gurdeep Singh. …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others. …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present: Mr. Rajeev K. Kapila, Advocate, for the petitioner. S.D. Anand, J. (Oral) Crl. Misc. No. 59680 of 2009 Allowed, as prayed for. Crl. Misc. No. M-33060 of 2009 The petitioner is the complainant in the relevant case. Without going into the correctness or otherwise of the averment in the course of the petition qua the competence of the second enquiry, it is apparent that the petitioner shall have to be compulsively afforded an opportunity of hearing before the cancellation report furnished by the police is taken up by the learned Illaqa Magistrate for consideration. That being so, the petitioner would be entitled to file a protest petition, if he is so inclined. In the light of that apparent position, learned counsel states that the present petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Disposed of accordingly. Copy of the order shall be forwarded forthwith to the learned Illaqa Magistrate concerned. November 25, 2009 ( S.D.Anand ) vkd Judge