IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2009 / 17TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 11823 of 2009(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SOCIETY OF SISTERS OF CHARITY LOURDES CONVENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROVINCIAL SUPERIOR SR.MERCY VARGHESE, SELLERE, CHEVAYOOR DESOM, CHEVAYOOR AMSOM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.L.ALOYSIUS THOMAS SRI.T.P.SAJAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, O/O OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA. 3. THAHASILDAR, AMBALAPUZHA TALUK, AMBALAPUZHA. 4. VILLAGE OFFICER, KALAVOOR VILLAGE, KALAVOOR. 5. RAJU, S/O. THANKAPPAN, THAIKOOTTATHIL, NOW AT PAVATHAN VEETTIL, KURUPPAMKULANGARA P.O., CHERTHALA. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI. M.A. ASIF THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.11823 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 7th day of April, 2009. JUDGMENT Complaining of delay in passing final orders on the application made by the petitioner for effecting mutation in respect of the property covered by Ext.P1 petitioner says that he has filed Ext.P7 complaint before the 3rd respondent. Counsel also refers to Ext.P5, where it is stated that the 2nd respondent has also directed the 3rd respondent to effect mutation as sought for. Taking into account the case of the petitioner regarding the pendency of Ext.P7 before the 3rd respondent, it is directed that the 3rd respondent shall consider Ext.P3 and pass orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 8 weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment,t with notice to the 5th respondent. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/