—g -t- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petitlon (S) No. 5158_ot_2008 Petitioner ,fi' Respondents Present: Smt. Saraswati Patel, aged about-30 years, Wfe. Shrs Ramssh Kutnar.R/o. Kotadoia, Distt. Korea (CG). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgartvthrough Its Seeretary, Department of Panchayat and Rurai Devetopment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. Collector, Korea, Distt. Korea (CG). 3. Janpad Panchayat, Bharatpur, through Us CNef Exsaitive Officsr, Distt. Korsa (CG). QWrit PeBtion under Article 228 ofthe Constitution of India) SB: Hon'ble Mr. SatishK. Agnihotri, J. Mr. Vinay Pandey counset for the peUUoner. Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for ttie State. ORAL ORDER (Passedon thislS dayofSepteniber, 2008) With the consent of learned counsel af^earing for &ie parties, the petition is heard finally. 2) Leamed eounsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merits, at this stage. However,the petitioner may be permitted to make a r^reserrtation before the concerned authorities within a period of three daysandthe same n®ybe directed to be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within the prescribed thne. 3) ' Mr. Y.S. Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate Generat appearing for the State submits that if the representation is made, the same shali be considered and decided by the concemed authority, in accordance with !aw, on ite own merits, within a period of two weeks from the date of recelpt of the representation. i SliW. 8 i-1-1 Raju ^ 4) Mr. Thakur further submlts that no coercwe steps shalt be taken against the petitioner, tilithedisposalofthe representation. 5) I hope and trust that the State Govemment shatt examine the representation objectlvely in accordance with law and guidelines, issued by the Government time to time 6) in vlew of the foregoing, the petitim stands disposed of. No ordsr as to cosls. Consequently, pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. 'Sd/- SatishK.Agntliotri . Judge ^ ITi'