IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.695 of 2008 1. DAYA SHANKER KUMAR SON OF RAMDEO SAH 2. RAMDEO SAH SON OF LAKHAN SAH BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BARAHI, P.S. PARIHAR, DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. …PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR …OPPOSITE PARTY For the petitioner : None For the State Mr. M. Dayal, APP ----------- 03. 20.04.2011 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners. Learned APP is present. Petitioners are aggrieved by order dated 20.05.2008, passed in S.T.No.550/07 whereby the prayer for discharge made under section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was considered and rejected. Learned court below in the order impugned has recorded that paragraphs 5 to 10, 18 to 20, 31,36 and 39 of the case diary reflects adequate materials incriminating the petitioners in commission of offence. Having found so, the said application was rejected. This Court does not find any patent illegality in the consideration of the matter by learned trial court. The application lacks merit which is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )