IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2009 / 17TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(Crl.).No. 172 of 2009(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- D.SUSHEELA, WIFE OF GIVINATHA PANIKAR, POTTUMANA, VALLIKUNNAM SOUTH MAVELIKARA ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNAN A.R.EASWARLAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. ZAKIR HUSSAIN, S/O. MUHAMMED,KUNJU, PUTHUKATTUTHARAYILVALLIKUNNU SOUTH, MAVELIKARA. 2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CHENGANNOOR. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MAVELIKARA. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VALLIKUNNU, MAVELIKARA. BY G.P. SRI. K.J. MOHAMMED ANZAR ADV. SRI.SUNNY MATHEW FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT & M.C. HARI RANI, JJ. ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(Cri) No. 172 of 2009-S ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT Basant,J. At 1.45 p.m., after the Court rose after the pre-lunch session, we had interactions with Ms. Laya, her mother - the petitioner herein as also her husband the 1st respondent. It appears to us that it is not possible at this point of time to persuade the petitioner to accept the relationship between her daughter - the alleged detenue, and the 1st respondent. She asserts that she is not willing to accept the marriage between the 1st respondent and Ms. Laya and that she will look after the alleged detenue if she alone returns to her. Ms. Laya is not willing for such a course, though she expresses her willingness to accompany the petitioner if she will accept the marriage between her and the 1st respondent. W.P.(Cri) No. 172 of 2009-S -: 2 :- 2. A harmonious settlement appears to be impossible now and, in these circumstances, we are satisfied that the proceedings in this writ petition can be closed. 3. Ms. Laya – the alleged detenue, is permitted to leave this Court with the 1st respondent who is now her legally wedded husband. 4. This writ petition is accordingly closed. Sd/- R. BASANT (Judge) Sd/- M.C. HARI RANI (Judge) Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge W.P.(Cri) No. 172 of 2009-S -: 3 :-