IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No. 1396 of 2004 Date of Decision: July 27, 2011 H.B. Malhotra ….Petitioner Versus Sh. D.S. Jaspal and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: None. Alok Singh, J. Present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner with the allegation that the respondents intentionally and willfully violated the orders of this Court dated 02.02.2004 and 23.07.2004 in Civil Writ Petition No. 14907 of 2002 and in Review Application No. 119 of 2004 respectively vide which this Court directed the respondents to pay all the pensionary benefits due to the petitioner within two months. In reply, filed by respondent No.1, it is specifically submitted that the orders of this Court have COCP No. 1396 of 2004 been fully complied with as the pension was already approved by Accountant General, Punjab, vide its letter dated 27.12.2004. As per the case of the respondents, the pensionary benefits have already been approved by the office of Accountant General, Punjab, vide its letter dated 27.12.2004 and it appears that by now the petitioner is enjoying the pensionary benefits and that is why neither the petitioner nor any one has appeared on his behalf, meaning thereby that he might be fully satisfied with the relief claimed in the writ petition. Otherwise also, the respondents have tendered unqualified apology for the delay occurred in releasing the pensionary benefits which is accepted. In view of this, present petition id disposed of and notice served on the respondents stands discharged. July 27, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2