... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.415 OF 2004 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri G.C. Sawant for the Appellants. Shri Ujjwal S. Patil i/by Anilkumar Patil for the Respondent No.1. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 20, 2006. : JULY 20, 2006. : JULY 20, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate appearing for the Appellants. The Appellants are the original Plaintiffs. The suit filed by the Appellants for redemption of alleged mortgage executed by the mother of the Appellants was dismissed by the Trial Court. The decree of the Trial Court has been confirmed in the Appeal. After having heard the learned Advocate appearing for the Appellants, I find that no substantial question of law arises. In view of the findings of fact recorded by the courts below, the Second Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE