IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Special Appeal No. 170 of 2007 Himendra Pratap Singh. .……… Appellant Versus Board of Uttarakhand State Seed Certification Agency & others. ……… Respondents Mr. Sudhanshu Dhulia, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. V.K. GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) The learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner vide the impugned judgment on the ground that for being absorbed as Seed Certification Inspector in Uttarakhand State Seed Certification Agency, he had given false declarations with respect to there being no adverse entry against him in the confidential reports. Actually, the learned Single Judge noticed that there was adverse entry against him. He has reproduced the following entry in the judgment under challenge also in this appeal: “He is not faithful for Corporation. Overall Grading “C”. Reporting Officer I agree with Jt. C.S.P.O. He is not trustworthy and involves in corrupt practice. Approving Authority.” In addition to the aforesaid, the appellant was also given a censure entry for his indecent behaviour and act of indiscipline, which was communicated to him on 20th February, 2001. The petitioner also concealed the fact of his having made representations against the aforesaid adverse entries and the rejection thereof. 2 Based on the aforesaid, the petitioner was repatriated to his parent Department i.e. Uttarakhand Seeds and Tarai Development Corporation Ltd. After hearing Mr. Sudhanshu Dhulia, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant / petitioner, we find that the learned Single Judge has correctly appreciated the facts and rightly upheld the order of repatriation of the petitioner. No interference is warranted. The appeal is dismissed in limine. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 27.06.2008 27.06.2008 G