IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 84 OF 2008 SHRI. EDWARD JOSE SALVADOR AREZ AND ANR., ... Appellants Versus SHRI. MANUEL FRANCISCO GUSTAVO AREZ ... Respondent Mr. J. P. D'souza,Advocate for the appellants. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 6th October, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard Mr.D'Souza, learned Counsel for the appellants. 2. By this appeal, the appellants, who are the original defendant Nos. 1 & 2 in civil suit No.85/2004 challenge the order dated 27th August, 2008 granting injunction against the appellants restraining them from doing construction in the suit property. 3. Having heard the learned Counsel for the appellants and having perused the record, I don't find any legal infirmity in the impugned order. By the impugned order, the Trial Court has granted injunction by which status-quo in so far as the construction in the suit property is concerned, is granted. It is well settled that an appeal against an order granting or refusing injunction, is an appeal on principle and unless there is perversity in the findings of the Trial Court, the Appellate Court should not normally interfere. I don't find any perversity in the findings recorded by the Trial Court. Hence, no case is made out for interference by this Court. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA