1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.924 OF 2009 Smt.Vimal Madhukarrao Gawande ...vs.. The Judge Small Causes Court, Nagpur. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram: S.R.DONGAONKAR,J . Dated : 21st March 2009. Heard Mr.V.G.Bhamburakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Sonare, AGP for respondent no.1. No notice was issued to respondent no.2. On perusal of the impugned order dated 6/10/2008, it appears that the plaint was rejected because the petitioner did not file the documents on record. According to the petitioner, she does not rely on any document as such and therefore, no documents were necessary to file. Therefore, the impugned order needs to be quashed and set aside with appropriate direction. 2 As the petitioner/plaintiff submits that she does not rely on any of the documents, acceptance of that statement would show that there was no necessity to file any document as observed by learned trial court. Accordingly, the order of rejection of plaint for want of filing of some documents is incorrect and not sustainable. Accordingly, the same is quashed and set aside and the learned trial judge is directed to register the suit and proceed in accordance with law. The petition stands disposed of in above terms. JUDGE. chute