In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Criminal Revision No.679 of 2008 Date of decision: 2.4.2009 State of Haryana ......Petitioner Versus Jagtar Singh and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Sidharth Sarup, AAG, Haryana. Ms.Swatanter Kapoor, Advocate, for the respondents. **** SABINA, J. Vide this revision petition, State has challenged the order dated 16.10.2007 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Yamunagar at Jagadhari, whereby the accused-respondents were discharged for want of sanction for prosecution. Vide the impugned order, the accused were discharged and it was observed by the trial Court that the prosecution has a legal right to file the charge sheet again after obtaining the requisite consent. Since sanction for prosecution of the accused under the Arms Act had been obtained, the police may file separate challan for Criminal Revision No.679 of 2008 -2- that before the Court of competent jurisdiction. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Rajinder Singh, has submitted that now sanction for prosecution of the case for commission of offence under other Sections of Indian Penal Code had been obtained; fresh challan had been presented and accused have been summoned by the concerned Magistate for 10.6.2009. In these circumstances, no further interference is called for. This petition is disposed of accordingly. (SABINA) JUDGE April 02, 2009 anita