IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.981 of 2009 Date of Decision: October 21, 2009 Ranjodh Singh & Others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mrs. Anu Chatrath Kapur, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) Vide Order dated 11.9.2009, the petition qua petitioner Nos.1 to 5 and 7 was disposed of as infructuous. The petition survives only in regard to petitioner No.6, Beant Singh son of Gurmail Singh. In regard to petitioner No.6, learned counsel for the respondents, on the basis of affidavit sworn on 26.5.2009 by Mr. Krishan Kumar, State Project Director, Sarva Siksha Abhiyan Authority, Punjab, contends that petitioner No.6, Beant Singh, did not come present during counselling CWP No.981 of 2009 [2] process and accordingly was not given appointment letter. No replication to the fact asserted has been filed. Petitioner has not placed any material on record to show that petitioner No.6 had joined counselling process. In view of the above, no ground for interference is made out. The petition is dismissed re: petitioner No.6, Beant Singh. (AJAI LAMBA) October 21, 2009 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?