Crl. Misc.No.M 29543 of 2010 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc.No.M 29543 of 2010 Date of Decision:-26.10.2010 Charanjit Singh @ Tinku @ Billa. ......Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab. ......Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH. Present:- Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG Punjab. *** JASWANT SINGH, J(ORAL) Prayer is for grant of regular bail under section 439 Cr.PC to the petitioner-Charanjit Singh @ Tinku @ Billa in case bearing FIR No.56 dated 12.7.2010 under sections 363, 366-A Indian Penal Code (376 IPC added later on) registered with Police Station Dugri, District Ludhiana. It is submitted that petitioner Charanjit Singh @ Tinku @ Billa and Sumita, daughter of complainant Tirath Ram, due to their lover affair had performed marriage on 11.7.2010 after elopement and against the wishes of complainant. They approached this court by Crl. Misc.No.M 29543 of 2010 #2# filing Crl. Misc.No.M 19677 of 2010 seeking protection as they were apprehending threat to their life and liberty at the hands of the complainant. This Court vide order dated 19.7.2010(P2) disposed of the said petition in view of the statement of complainant that he shall not cause any harm to the petitioners, i.e. Petitioner Charanjit Singh and Sumita. Learned counsel further submits that subsequently Sumita had returned to her parental home and complainant Tirath Ram isnow pursuing the FIR lodged prior to 19.7.2010, which fact was not disclosed to this court on 19.7.2010. It is further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 20.7.2010. It is also submitted that Sumita of her own sweet Will had remained with the petitioner from 7.7.2010 till date of arrest of the petitioner i.e. 20.7.2010. Learned State Counsel on instructions from ASI Hardev Singh submits that investigation is over and challan has been presented in the present case. Without expressing anything on the merits of the case, keeping in view the fact that the investigation is over, the petition is allowed and prayer for grant of regular bail is accepted. Petitioner is directed to be released on bail subject to satisfaction of the CJM/Duty Magistrate Ludhiana. ( JASWANT SINGH ) JUDGE 26th October, 2010 Vinay