- 1 - 19.rpl.14.09 ss.3358.05 skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.14 OF 2009 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3920 OF 2005 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3358 OF 2005 Rashid Irani ..Petitioner -Versus- Hanif S/o Haji P. Kunhi Ahmed & Ors. ..Respondents .......... Mr.Pranav Sampat i/b Thakore Jariwala & Associates for the Plaintiff. Mr.S.P.Srivastava for Respondent No.2. .......... CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 29TH JUNE 2011. P.C. 1 There is no warrant for reviewing the order dated 25th February 2008. It is alleged that the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the review petitioner/plaintiff wrongly stated that the avernemnts in the plaint are through inadvertence. That, however is not a ground for review. If the statement was made through inadvertence, the petitioner is always at liberty to take out a fresh Notice of Motion to withdraw the same. - 2 - 19.rpl.14.09 ss.3358.05 Needless to add that all the contentions in such a Notice of Motion and any other proceedings would be without prejudice to the rights of the parties. The Review Petition stands disposed of. -