IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8047 OF 2004 Dadabhau Genuji Chavan Petitioner versus Maharashtra State Khadi and Village Industries Board and others Respondents S.V.Pitre, adv. for petitioner. V.P.Vaze, adv. for R-1. CORAM : A.P.SHAH AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 1st November 2004 PC : 1. Heard advocates. 2. Perused affidavit filed on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. 3. The petitioner has been asked to proceed on leave in view of proposed disciplinary inquiry. Having regard to the seriousness of the charges levelled against petitioner, in our opinion, this is not a fit case for our interference under Article 226 of Constitution of India. 4. Learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 states that arrears of salary of petitioner’s, if any, will be paid within two weeks from today. 5. Petition is accordingly disposed of. (A.P.SHAH, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)