:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.64 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.64 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.64 OF 2007 IN IN IN PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.96 OF 2006 INTEREST LITIGATION NO.96 OF 2006 INTEREST LITIGATION NO.96 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Applicants V/s Sunil S. Vichare ..Respondent. Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni, AAG for the applicants Mr.Sunil S.Vichare-in person- respondent CORAM CORAM CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND : J.N. PATEL AND : J.N. PATEL AND A.A. A.A. A.A. SAYED, JJ. SAYED, JJ. SAYED, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 21ST SEPTEMBER, 2007 : 21ST SEPTEMBER, 2007 : 21ST SEPTEMBER, 2007 P.C. 1. Heard. 2. On going through the application, we find that the authorities have taken cognizance of the matter and have taken steps and have filed two separate affidavits, one by the Collector, Ratnagiri and other by Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division Chiplun, who are the in-charge of the rehabilitation process and therefore, this Court is inclined to recall its order dated 5th September, 2007, as there has been substantial compliance in the matter. The Civil Application is therefore, allowed in terms of :2: prayer clause (b) and (c). The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would like to file affidavit-in-rejoinder. After doing so, the matter be listed after four weeks. ( J.N.PATEL, J.) J.N.PATEL, J.) J.N.PATEL, J.) ( A.A. SAYED, J.) A.A. SAYED, J.) A.A. SAYED, J.)