IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4593 of 1996 ** For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- AKASH MANGALDAS PARMAR Versus AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR YN OZA for Petitioner M/S ANAND ADVOCATES for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT Date of decision: 09/10/96 ORAL JUDGEMENT Heard learned advocates for the parties. Rule Shri Anand, learned advocate appearing for the respondents waives service of the rule. 2. The petitioner is seeking employment in the respondent-Corporation on compassionate grounds. Learned advocate Shri Anand states that the petitioner has not placed all the relevant material along with his application for compassionate employment. Therefore, his application is not yet considered. In the circumstances it is directed that the respondent-Corporation shall consider the application made by the petitioner for compassionate employment in accordance with law within a period of two months after the petitioner completes all the formalities and submits all the relevant material to the respondent-Corporation. The petition is allowed to the aforesaid extent. Rule is made absolute accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. -oOo- karim*