IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 486 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision:- 18.8.2010 Atma Ram ......petitioner vs. Kamal Kant Goel, and others ......respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. Kashmir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Meenu Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. S. S.Sahu, AAG, Punjab for respondents No. 3 to 5. HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for respondents No. 1 and 2 states that demolished shops have been reconstructed. Learned counsel for the petitioner accepts that the shops have been reconstructed. In view of the said fact, no further orders are called for in the present contempt petition. Consequently, the same is dismissed as having been rendered infrucutous. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 18.8.2010 preeti