HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.1548 OF 2008 DATE: 05-08-2011 BETWEEN: T. Venkatesh and five others. - - - Petitioners/ A-1 to A-6. AND B.A. Bala Krishna and The State of A.P., Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. - - - Respondents/ Complainant. This Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.1548 OF 2008 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the Petitioners/A-1 to A-6 under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the proceedings in P.R.C. No.60 of 2007, pending on the file of X Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri, Ranga Reddy District. 2. Whereas the Petitioners are A-1 to A-6, the Respondent No. 1 herein is the De-facto Complainant in the Preliminary Registered Case. 3. For the sake of convenience, I refer the parties as arrayed in the Preliminary Registered Case. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the Accused and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the Respondents-State. 5. The prosecution version is that the accused trespassed into the house of the de-facto complainant situated at Malkajgiri, Hyderabad on 04-02-2007 at 09-30 p.m. and threatened to kill his family members and abused him in filthy language touching his caste and they also threatened that they would burn the house and car of the de-facto complainant into ashes and also his family members. 6. It is the contention of learned counsel for the accused that similar cases were filed at the instance of de-facto complainant but they were dismissed and it shows that the de-facto complainant involved in filing false cases and on that ground the P.R.C. now in question is liable to be quashed. 7. Now the point for consideration is whether there are sufficient grounds in order to quash the proceedings in the P.R.C. Case? 8. I have gone through the record. There are specific allegations against the accused with reference to the alleged offences. Therefore, even supposing that similar other cases filed by the de-facto complainant against them ended in acquittal, the same is not a ground to quash the proceedings in question. Hence, the Criminal Petition is liable to be dismissed. 9. It is also represented that the Petitioners/4 to 6 are ladies and their presence before the trial Court may be dispensed with, unless it is so necessary. For the foregoing reasons, The Criminal Petition is dismissed, however, since the accused Nos.4 to 6 are ladies, their presence before the trial Court is dispensed with till the commencement of the trial of the case. __________________________ G. KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY, J Dated: 05-08-2011. Dsh. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY 239 CRIMINAL PETITION No.1548 OF 2008 August, 05, 2011 DSH