ash 1 cac-147.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.147 OF 2011 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.464 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri M.P. Vashi i/by M/s. M.P. Vashi & Associates for the Applicants. Shri A.M. Sethna with Ms Triveni S. Jani i/by Shri Shardul Ramaiya for the Respondents. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 14TH DECEMBER, 2011 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. This is an application for amendment for adding additional contentions in the Revision Application. One of the contentions is that as far as ground of acquisition of suitable residence is concerned, the suit was barred by limitation. Reliance is placed on a decision of this Court in the case of Shashikant Yeshwant Limaye & Anr v. Chintaman Vinayak Kolhatkar since deceased through L.Rs. Smt. Vijaya Vishwas Ukide & Others (2010(5)Mh.L.J. 527). The said contention of bar of ash 2 cac-147.11 limitation is sought to be raised only on the basis of the facts which are already on record. The second contention sought to be raised is that the cross- examination of the original first Defendant could not be completed as he expired and therefore, his evidence will have to be kept out of consideration. The amendment will have to be permitted. Accordingly, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. (A.S.OKA, J)