CWP No.3351 of 2011.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.3351 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.02.2011 **** Harbhajan Singh & Ors. . . . . Petitioners VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate for the petitioners ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). Notice of motion. Ms. Monica Chhibber Sharma, learned DAG Punjab and Mr. Jagjeet Singh, Advocate appearing on behalf of Mr. HS Brar, Advocate accept notices on behalf of respondent-State and GMADA, respectively. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to call upon the respondents to file their counter-reply(ies) at this stage. (2). The petitioners, who are said to be 1984-riot victims, seek regularization/allotment of the LIG flats in terms of various Government policy decisions. (3). Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the controversy involved herein stands settled vide order CWP No.3351 of 2011.doc - 2 – dated 14.09.2010 passed in CWP No.16345 of 2009 titled as Kuljit Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. and a batch of other writ petitions. (4). The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of Kuljit Singh and other’s case (supra). (5). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 24.02.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge