IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.43 of 2008 UEPNDRA SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4. 12.11.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the order passed on 11.1.2008 does not suffer from any such error apparent on the face of record which can be reviewed by this Court. The grievance of the petitioner that there was no relief involved in the connected writ application out of which contempt application had been filed is only to be noted for its being rejected. All that has been said in the order dated 11.1.2008 is that there is a substantive criminal case pending against the petitioner for defalcation of Government exchequer and in that view, as a circular of the State Government prohibits payment of full pension i.e. 100% pension including the gratuity, the same cannot be directed to be paid and there was no contempt if such payment was not made. That being so, this Court finds hardly any scope to review the 2 aforementioned order. This review application is wholly misconceived and is hereby dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/