HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.20102 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.09.2011 **** Faqir Sing . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. RK Verma, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG Punjab ***** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) (1). Learned State counsel has placed on record the orders dated 14.01.2011 whereby due benefits have been released to the petitioner, a Photostat copy whereof be handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner. (2). In case the petitioner is still dissatisfied with the revision of pension or other retiral benefits, liberty is granted to him to submit a self-explanatory representation which shall be disposed of by the respondents by passing a reasoned order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Suffice it to mention that the consequential benefits flowing from the above-mentioned order dated 14.01.2011 passed by the respondents shall be released within a period of one month thereafter. (3). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 02.09.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge CWP No.20102 of 2009.doc - 2 –