IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 1288 of 2010 Date of Decision: 27.1.2010. Krishna Yadav --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Vipin Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.S. Kundu, Addl. A.G., Haryana has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents-State. In response to the advertisement inviting applications for selection/appointment for the post of Sanskrit Lecturer, the petitioner submitted her application. The selection was to be made on the basis of the written test followed by the interview. On completion of the selection process the result was declared on 9.10.2008. It is admitted case of the petitioner that in the female category the last selectee has got 124 out of 225 marks. It is also admitted position that the petitioner has secured 112 marks in written examination out of 200 and 8 out of 25 marks in the interview. Thus, the petitioner's merit is less than the last selectee. Petitioner applied under RTI Act for supplying copy of OMR sheet. It is stated that the same was not supplied and the petitioner filed an appeal before the Appellate Authority and her appeal has been rejected. She has also filed an appeal before the State Information Commission which is still pending. The petitioner has challenged the entire selection for the post of Sanskrit CWP. No. 1288 of 2010 -2- Lecturer in the present petition. At the first place petitioner has not impleaded the selectees as party-respondents. Otherwise also the only ground in the writ petition is that she applied for supplying copy of the OMR sheet which has not been given to her. This cannot be a ground to challenge the entire selection. No ground much less a legal and valid ground for challenging the selection has been made out in the writ petition. No merit, petition dismissed. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 27.1.2010. lucky