Civil Revision No. 3751 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3751 of 2011 Date of Decision: 2.6.2011 *** Nirmal Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Lakhbir Singh .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The petitioner-defendant is aggrieved with order dated 23.5.2011 passed by the learned trial Court by virtue of which the application of respondent-plaintiff to get an expert witness examined in rebuttal, has been allowed. Heard. It evident from the records that the dispute pertains to one agreement to sell allegedly executed by the petitioner, to which there is denial. It is apposite to mention here that vide order dated 8.1.2002 the defendant was directed to given his specimen signature/ thumb impression, but the defendant did not appear before the Court and suit was ultimately decreed. The appeal against the said judgment was dismissed. However, this Court allowed the regular second appeal of the petitioner-defendant and granted him one opportunity to lead the evidence, with the observations that plaintiff shall have the right to lead evidence in rebuttal. It is only when the defendant produced an expert, the plaintiff filed the application to lead evidence in rebuttal by way of examination of an expert, which has been rightly granted to him in the light of the above facts. Dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE June 02,2011 Jiten