CRLR No.80/04 Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. None turns up either on behalf of the revisionists or for opposite party no.2 even in the revised call up to 3:25 PM. However, Sri Nandan Arya, AGA for the State is present. It appears that this revision was filed by the wife and her minor daughter against the judgment and order granting maintenance of Rs.2,000/- in total to her, against the opposite party no.2 u/s 125 Cr.P.C. She claimed the maintenance in her petition for Rs.4,500/- per month but the learned Court thought it proper, after hearing on merits, to grant the maintenance, as above. Feeling disgruntled, the revisionists Smt. Farzana Khatun and Km. Fija have filed this revision. Having gone through the facts and evidence, which adverts the source of income of Mohd. Islam, this Court finds that the grant of maintenance to the tune of Rs.2,000/- (Rs.1,500 + Rs.500) on 16.4.2004, from the date of application, is quite appropriate. If the amount is insufficient, on account of escalation of prices, then Smt. Farjana is free to move another application u/s 127 Cr.P.C. With the above observations, the revision is finally disposed of. Let the lower court record be sent back to the trial court concerned. (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) 22.11.2011 Rdang