// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3045/2008 Bahadur Madda S/o Miththu Lal Versus Smt. Shanti W/o Pradeep and Another Date of Order ::: 28.07.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Naseem Uddin Qazi, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The plaintiff-petitioner filed a suit for permanent injunction in respect of disputed property in the trial court along- with an application for temporary injunction, which was dismissed by the trial court. Being aggrieved with the same, an appeal was preferred but without success, hence this writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the plaintiff. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner in the light of reasons assigned by both the courts below while rejecting the application for // 2 // temporary injunction filed by the plaintiff- petitioner and, after considering the same, I find that both the courts below have recorded a finding in respect of prima-facie case, the balance of convenience and irreparable injury in favour of the defendants and against the plaintiff-petitioner. The said finding cannot be interfered with by this Court. I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in both the impugned orders so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//