IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.41799 of 2009 RAMBABU SAHANI, S/O LATE DILIP SAHANI Versus STATE OF BIHAR **** /3/ 02.02.2010 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 302 and 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. 3. In the first information report it has been stated that the petitioner and co-accused, Sajawal Sahni, were seen fleeing away from the house of the informant where his wife had been killed. The reason for the occurrence is that earlier the present petitioner was accused in the murder of the son of the informant and accused persons, including the present petitioner, wanted the case to be compromised, which the informant and his family members resisted. 4. Under the circumstances, when the petitioner was seen fleeing away from the place of occurrence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 5. The prayer for bail is rejected. 6. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)