IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8320 of 2009 1. RAMASHRAYA YADAV, SON OF LATE RAMDHANI YADAV, RESIDENT VILLAGE SAHORA, P.S. CHANDRADIP, DISTRICT- JAMUI AT PRESENT SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLICE LINE, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. 2. NIRAJ KUMAR, SON OF LAL NARAYAN PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- AZADNAGAR MANASPURI, P.S. TOWN, DISTRICT-EAST CHAMPARAN, AT PRESENT SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLICE LINE, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH HOME SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OFBIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT,PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. THE A.D.G.P. (HEADQUARTER) GOVERNMENT OF OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MUZAFFARPUR ZONE, MUZAFFARPUR. 5. THE DY. INSPECTOR GENEAL OF POLICE, TIRHUT RANGE, MUZAFFARPUR. 6. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SITAMARHI. 7. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,MUZAFFARPUR. ----------- 2. 20.7.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners are holding the post of Sub-Inspector of Police. They are aggrieved by the transfer made under District Order No.307/2009 dated 7.3.2009, Annexure-4 where under they have been transferred from Sitamarhi to Muzaffarpur. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the transfer order is contrary to the provisions contained in Section 10 of the Bihar Police Act,2007, - 2 - N.H./ where under they could be transferred out of a district only after completing period of six years. Petitioners have already joined the transferred post. 4. As the petitioners have already joined the transferred post, it is deemed expedient to grant them liberty to represent before the competent authority highlighting the grounds raised in this application that the transfer is contrary to the provisions contained in Section 10 of the Bihar Police Act,2007 and if the authorities are satisfied that the transfer order has been issued ignoring the provisions contained in Section 10 of the Bihar Police Act,2007 then appropriate orders in accordance with law be passed as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt of the representation. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. ( V.N. Sinha,J.) - 3 -