pvr 1 Ap1366-1367-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.1366 OF 2010 1.Sanghi Enterprises & Anr. ...Petitioners vs. HDFC Bank Ltd. ...Respondent AND ARBITRATION PETITION NO.1367 OF 2010 1.Sanghi Transport Co. & Anr. ...Petitioners vs. HDFC Bank Ltd. ...Respondent --- Mr.A.M.Vernekar @ Girish Thakur, for Petitioners. Mr.Ms.V.K.Srivastav i/b. M/s.Consulta Juris, for Respondent. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 7th July,2011. P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for petitioners. Perused the record. The Awards of the learned Arbitrator are based only on the findings of facts. Admittedly, loan was taken. pvr 2 Ap1366-1367-10 There was default in paying the installment. Therefore, the claim was made by the bank. So far as the counterclaim is concerned, the learned Arbitrator has relied on the memorandum of understanding. The case of the petitioners was that the petitioner was forced to sign that memorandum of understanding. If the criminal force was applied for getting memorandum of understanding signed, there is no complaint made to the police, no complaint was lodged for alleged criminal force. As the Awards are based only on the findings of facts, in the limited jurisdiction of this Court under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Awards cannot be interfered with. The petitions are, therefore, disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) ---