IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2011 / 2ND POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 34923 of 2011(M) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- M/S.SANTHIMADOM HERBAL CITY TRUST, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN DR.RADHAKRISHNAN, S/O.NARAYANAN,SANTHIMADOM,N.PARAVUR,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.PRADEEP KUMAR. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) III, KERA BHAVAN,KOCHI - 682 012. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -2, ERNAKULAM. R1 & R2 BYSRI. JOSE JOSEPH, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.34923/2011-M: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM AND STAY PETITION DURING THE PETIOD 2007-2008 APPEAL NO.75/CENT/CIT(A) III-2010-11. EXHIBIT P2. TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM AND STAY PETITION DURING THE PERIOD 2008-2009 APPEAL NO.76/CENT/CIT(A) III-2010-11. EXHIBIT P3. TRUE COPY OF APPEAL MEMORANDUM AND STAY PETITION DURING THE PERIOD 2009-2010 APPEAL NO.75/CENT/CIT(A) III-2010-11. EXHIBIT P4. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT ON 15.11.2011. EXHIBIT P5. TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DURING THE PERIOD 2007-2008. EXHIBIT P6. TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DURING THE PERIOD 2008-2009. EXHIBIT P7. TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DURING THE PERIOD 2009-2010. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Prv. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No.34923 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext.P4 order passed by the appellate authority under the Income Tax Act, in a petition for stay filed along with an appeal against assessment order passed by the assessing authority, whereby the petitioner has been directed to pay Rs.14 lakhs out of a total demand of Rs.27,71,238/-. The petitioner only seeks two more weeks' time to pay the said amount as per Ext.P4. 2. This is opposed by the Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department. However taking a lenient view, I direct the respondents to grant the petitioner two more weeks' time from today to pay the amount covered by Ext.P4. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE //True copy// P.A. TO JUDGE shg/