IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 14542 of 2008 Between: 1 Chinthala Cheruvu Bharathamma W/o. D. Eswar Prasad Rao Head Post Office, Nakkalagutta, Hanumakonda, Warangal District. 2 D. Eswar Prasad Rao S/o. Rameshwar Rao R/o. H.No. 2-9-699, N.G.Os Colony, Hanumakonda, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Station House Officer Subedari Police Station, Subedari, Hanamakonda,. Warangal District. 2 Mr. Indurthi Venkateshwara Rao S/o. Sathyanarayana Rao Hanamakonda,. Warangal District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue appropriate writ order or direction most preferably one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in calling the petitioners to Police Station without registering any FIR and G.D. Entry has been illegal, and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents not to call the petitioners/harass the petitioners without following due process of law. Counsel for the Petitioners : MR. P.SRINIVAS REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.14542 2008 ORDER : This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a declaration that the alleged action of the respondents in calling the petitioners to the police station without registering any First Information Report (FIR) and in the absence of any entry in the General Diary is arbitrary and illegal. The Circle Inspector of Police, Subedari Police Station, Hanamakonda, ﬁled a counter-aﬃdavit denying the allegations made by the petitioners and stating that as of now no complaint whatsoever is received against the petitioners and that he never summoned the petitioners to the police station. Having regard to the statement of the respondents in his counter-aﬃdavit, no further enquiry is necessary in the writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, recording the statement of the respondents, with a direction not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioners in any manner whatsoever without following due process of law. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 02.09.2008 gbs