S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 89/2008 (Abid Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 11.02.2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. Sandeep Mehta for the petitioner. Mr. J.P.S.Choudhary, P.P. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and public prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the age of the prosecutrix is 19 years and she at her own accompanied the petitioner. From the perusal of the statement of the prosecutrix, it appears that while the prosecutrix was going Kakroli, on the way at Chopati, the petitioner approached her and asked where she is going, on which she stated that she is going to her friend's (Saheli's) house, then he asked her to take juice and took her to a juice shop and offered the juice. It is stated that after taking the juice, she started feeling giddiness and thereafter saying that he would take her to hospital, instead of taking her to a hospital, he took her to a different place and ultimately handed over to co-accused Suhail who alleged to have committed rape on her. Keeping in view the statement of the prosecutrix and the allegation that the prosecutrix was taken by a deceitful means and subsequently she was subjected to forcible sexual intercourse by co-accused Suhail, in my view, it is not a fit case to grant bail. The bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp