IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.702 of 2011 Chhote Chauhan …Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar …Opposite party ----------- 2. 24.06.2011 Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioner assails the judgment and order of conviction recorded by learned trial court in T.R. No. 1383 of 2006, whereby he was held guilty under sections 25(I-B) and 26 of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo R.I. for two years with fine and R.I. for one year respectively. Aggrieved thereby, he preferred appeal being Cr. Appeal No. 047 of 2006. On a reappraisal of the evidence, learned appellate court held him guilty only under section 25(I-B) a of the Arms Act and inflicted a lessor punishment of R.I. for one year with fine having default clause. The conviction recorded under section 26 of the Arms Act by learned trial court was, however, found not sustainable. In other words, the appeal was partly allowed. Learned counsel for the petitioner made diverse submissions to assail the order impugned. There is concurrent finding of guilt. Submissions of the counsel do not demonstrate any perversity in the consideration of the matter by learned appellate court. A submission has also been advanced on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner deserves a lessor quantum of sentence for the proven charge(s). It appears that learned appellate court has already 2 reduced the sentence from R.I. for two years with fine having default clause to R.I. for one year with fine having default clause. In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the judgment impugned. The application is dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )