IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31095 of 2009 RAMA KANT TIWARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 8.9.2009 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the Counsel appearing for the State. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner’s name has been roped in the case, though no role has been played by him in advancement of loan in favour of the informant for purchasing a tractor. Petitioner is the owner of the agency which supplies Sonalika tractor, in case of advancement of loan. Petitioner released the tractor in favour of the informant, as per the direction of Bank, since money was deposited in the account of the petitioner’s agency. Considering this fact that there is no allegation that petitioner has cheated the informant either by sanctioning the loan or by releasing the tractor, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above named surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in Dehri Indira - 2 - Puri P.S. case No. 299 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.kumar