^u? iusi'U^s? ® <TD IN THE HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cl No^S ^^ / 2006 PETITIONER Bedram , aged about 45 ^ years, S/o Shri Santosh Birha, R/o Village Dhebhikhar, Tahsil Kasdol, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ..••Vi^ > ..•• ,4^iS:// ^^%b-"' ^•.^•y~ A-^''..ri" I!':'' -e<: r^J^ ^ ^^S •^ 1^^ \.G ^fr^" The State of Chhattisgarh, /- Through Secretary, Forest Departtnent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Union of India, through Secretary Forest Department, New DelhJ Forest Range Officer,. Baranwapara (Abhyaran), Dtstt. Raipur Divisional forest Officer,^ General Forest Division, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CON8TITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 ^ 73! '^WW-t^, VnKv'W, Rdiyy trp:iwg>TfTw"""""""""" WT 200 311^1 4s|cb (>jc)I^st<^iT) an^T^f^ig; OTT an^T sfiii* -& s^iraTflfersn^T 12.10.200S Shri Parag Kotecha, counsel Shri Arun Sao, Govi. Advocal on advance cbpy. Shri Raghvendra Pradhan,ci india on advance copy. .Argumenfs heard. Order dictated as follows: OFtAL ORDER SUNIL KUMARSINHA, J. By way of this writ petiti^n Constitution of India, the petitioni directions to the State authorities constitution and etection of the with the said prayer, be has aiso praji schedules the date for eSection of thl should also be quashed. The subject matter of this V^ the subject maaers of WP No.552pi have been heard and dismissed bv Learned counsel for the petii State/respondents does not dispute In view of the above, this Wril stage on the grounds and reasons s< in W.P. No.5524/2006 andW.P. No.i °bi'iiFcf'ifl-i 4iti<-fTfftecit'<Ri<^;i< ^3i1^ff3n^T w the petitioner. 3 for the State/respondents No.1, 3 & 4 unse! for respondent No.2/ Union of - 2.10.2006) fited under Articte 226/227 of the r, has prayed for issuance of certain )o fonnuiale the rules pertaining to the m4"bere of Van Sumksha Sanvfi. Atong jyed that the memo Annexure P-3, which offlce bearers of Van Suraksha SanvS, ffiis (rit Petition is exactly identical to that of 2^!20W and W.P. No.5525/2005, which Court vide ordens dated 10.10.2006. loner as well as tearned counsel for the Ipiis factua! position. Petition is also dismissed at the motion i^ated in orders dated 10.10.2006 passed ^525/2006. Sd/. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ^^