1 SSK/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5045 OF 2009 Shri Manohar Harichandra Thakur ....Petitioner Versus Shri D. G. Pawar & Ors. ...Respondents Dr. P. K. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. C. G. Gavnekar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Ms. P. S. Cardozo, AGP for Respondent No.4. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 6TH JULY, 2010. P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. By the impugned order, the Chief Executive Officer, Raigad - Respondent No.3, by way of punishment, extended the probation period of Respondent No.1 by a period of six months. The probation period was extended, as the Respondent No.1 issued two birth certificates in respect of birth of Miss Rupali Manohar Thakur-daughter of the Petitioner. An explanation from Respondent No.1 was called for, by Respondent No.3. The Respondent No.1 accordingly gave explanation that by mistake two 2 birth certificates of different dates were issued. This explanation was accepted by Respondent No.3 and by way of punishment, the probation period of Respondent No.1 was extended by a period of six months. I do not find any justification to interfere in the impugned order. Even otherwise also, the Petitioner has no locus to challenge the impugned order by filing the proceedings under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition is accordingly dismissed. (R. V. MORE, J.)