6%Taal Girls Higher Dharamjalgarh, Disr’r. Raigarh CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 4. Sla’le of Chhallisgarh, lhrough — Secrelary, Deparlmem‘ of Tribal Welfare, Dau Tribal - Welfare, (00.) »—\ Sancholok), Accounfs, /3. Assisfanf Direclor (Sahayak Treasury and ChhaHisgarh Government, Bilaspur, Near Nufan Chowk, Sarkanda, Disff. Bilaspur (ca) 4. Principal, Govf. Tribal Girls Higher School, DisH. Raigarh Secondary Dhoramjaigarh, (Chhoh‘isgorh) WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, O1. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER As per cause Ti’rle. ® Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Asslslan’r Commissioner, Depll of DisH. Raigarh 7,_’/' ,WRIT PETITION (S) NO. £5 /2007 PETITIONER / Manmohan Singh Pawar, aged abouf 47 years, son of Shri Raghuraj Singh, Lecturer, Governmen’r Tribal Sec. School, IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CG F}&\QL\W \6 H§GH CGERT OF {LIHHATTESGARH 1 B§LASPUR ‘xj‘;¥RIT E3E?§TION {’8} NS~4§5 QF 20G? PETiTiONER Maamaham $mgh 9awar Vefsus RES R‘JNEENTS Siaie 0:” Chhati§$garh 8e Ot§1ers {Writ Petiimn umdea’ Ariime 226 m’ the Corasiiiuiéon cf mdia} Singm Bench : Horz’blé Smi $a‘i§sh K. {Agm‘miri J. §5sent :— Shr§ AN Bhakia, caunse! forms pemimer. Sm AV. Sridhaf, Pane! Lawyer for the State. QRQER (GRAD {Pasged an 'tms 8‘“ day sf Februayy, 2m G) By ‘chis §Ei§%im, the petiiione? prays f0? quashmem 9f the ‘1. With the mnseni 0f :eamed courjsei appearing {or the @arties, the peimen is heard fir1a§§y. ? Ix §mg>ugned enaarsgment daiea§ 84-2130? (Annexure — W?) maae in ihe sewice book a?” the peiéimner whereby afid whereunder the increments granted to ihe petitkmar an accoun’i cf asquisitian of BEd. qua§ifica€im were canceiied and it was wrecked io'recaver the emcunt eaid eawer fmm ‘ihe pemmner. The reievem facts o§ the case fei“ edguijicaeom are that imi§a§$y the eetmener wee apgmimed en 16—12-198? ii‘a ihe i'eepondeni deparimem amd we?“ ta that Ehe pe‘xitiomer esmp§eted BEG. degfee in ihe year @984 ea his own expeneee. Thefefefe, on the basis of the etate Gwemmem circuiers {we advanee imcrements wefe ga'anied ta the @etitioner beef. §8~iD—2GG3. (!x §e l)» Hawever, ai's sf a sudden wiihcut issuing Shaw sause Home 3r affording an Gppaé’iumw 0f hearing anti wi’ihaut faiiowmg ihe due proce3s of Law by andcrgemeiit dated 84—29%? {Annexurs — W1) made m we service beak of the pemioner, V ‘ihe incremenfis granted to Ewe pei§fc§sner on accoant of acquisiiisn (3f EEG. quaiiimaiicn wefe camcegied and it was ‘ directed t0 recover {he amount fmm me pemicnar. Thus, ihis pewmn. Learned ccunsei’ agapearing far the petiimner subm%t$ ”maé the §ssue invoived in {he pre$ent case is m) kmger yes imegra as Ehe same ms beer} camiciered and deciwed '33; me Supreme 39W in Ashe 9“ m”: v Siafe nf MP. 5'; Ora? 95 we“ a: *has Cam”: 3’: Yashwaai Kumar gharaafwaj v. Mumcipal Carperaim, Durg and anofher? and m other caiena i3? r§ec§s§ona Learned caunsei further $ui3m§ts ihai we in'siant petiticn is squarea’y covered by me deMsion as afere$taied Thus; $he pemkmer may Se gramed simiiaf re§isi i have heaw Seamed munssi appaaring far the partéea perused ‘Ehe pieaciings and the dacumenis appended fheraic. ’s‘he circula¥ dated 24-?2—39Q6 §s very cieaf “in: the affec% ma? ai¥ €he teaahers who have Obtained aEa; Mi‘id” B.T.§. em mining cariifica‘te are smé‘iieci m twe advance increments. 3n tha pressm case, me peii"tisnar Wm hag, amama‘eci 8&3. u. :u v "V1.“ v. v u w I. um: ‘. y exammation cemf‘icaie in ihe year 1%84 $3 gquarew gcwemeii by the circuiar daied 24-1 2-1 998‘ For éhe masons memicned hereinabove‘ me may direcimg reccvery of the amoum, which was paid 0n accoum of acquisition af two inca’emani‘s, is quashea‘ and 'ihe pei§iione¥ wauiii be entiiged to the payment of iwe advance incrameratg from “the date i% was granted eiame; can ascoum af @w33e3$mm of EEci. degrae. The feswndems are accordimgiy dimmed m do the fieed'mi wkhm & periad m“ fmee manihs mm ihe date 0f receipt of a copy €3f th'aS ordef! subject m verificatmn m? facts. in the resuii: ihe writ petmcn i3 aiiowed i0 ihe ex‘xen‘t indicated above. No ardef asto cosis. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri 3 Judge Gowri 4‘