(Delay Condonation Appl. No.11933 of 2011) In CLCON No.123 of 2011 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Mr M.S. Tyagi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr Dinesh Gahtori, Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 & 2. Mr Manish Arora, Advocate for respondent nos.3 to 6. Delay condonation application is allowed. Affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no.2 is taken on record. Heard. In paragraph 9 of the affidavit, respondent no.2 has submitted that on 05.11.2011 the allotment of the Fishery Pond has been made in favour of Sahkari Matasya Jeevi Samiti Ltd., Zhabredi Kalan on annual rent. Learned counsel for respondent no.2 submitted that in view of the fact that allotment has been made in favour of Sahkari Matasya Jeevi Samiti Ltd., Zhabredi Kalan, the contempt petition has rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that order passed by this Court has not been complied with in letter and spirit as Sahkari Matasya Jeevi Samiti Ltd., Roorkee is not the Sahkari Matasya Jeevi Samiti Ltd., Zhabredi Kalan. Since allotment has already been made, this Court does not think it proper to keep this contempt petition pending and accordingly, contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous. It is always open for the petitioner to challenge the order of allotment dated 05.11.2011 before appropriate Court. (V.K. Bist, J.) 24.11.2011 Arti