1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 261 OF 2009 AND WRIT PETITION NO. 293 OF 2009 1. Dr. Sricrishna Balchandra Kenkre, ( since deceased ) represented by his legal heirs: (a) Miss Tanya Sricrishna Kenkre, daughter of late Dr. Sricrishna B. Kenkre, major of age, unmarried, resident of 1913, Garrick Drive, Pittsburg, PA 15235 U.S.A. Represented by Power of Attorney, Petitioner No.2. (b) Mr. Balchandra Neilesh Kenkre, major of age, bachelor, resident of 1913, Garrick Drive, Pittsburg, PA 15235, U.S.A. Represented by Power of Attorney, Petitioner No.2. 2. Mrs. Anasuya Sricrishna Kenkre alias Anasuya Sheila Kenkre, wife of Sricrishna Balchandra Kenkre, resident of 1913, Garrick Drive, Pittsburg, PA 15235 U.S.A. For service c/o the Manager, Hotel Mandovi, Panaji Goa. ... Petitioners in both petitions. V e r s u s 1. Mr. Umakant Bhalchandra Kenkre, son of Bhalchandra Kenkre, major of age, retired, married, residing at Kenkre House, Cabeca, St. Cruz, Ilhas Goa. 2 2. Mrs. Durgabai U. Kenkre, major of age, married, Residing at Kenkre House, Cabeca, St. Cruz, Ilhas Goa. 3. Mrs. Vanashree Fotu Kenkre, widow of late Fotu Sinai Kenkre, major of age, Residing at Kenkre House, Cabeca, St. Cruz, Ilhas Goa. 4. Mr. Nitin Fotu Kenkre, son of late Fotu Sinai Kenkre, Major of age, Married, and his wife, 5. Mrs. Pratibha N. Kenkre, major in age, wife of Mr. Nitin Fotu Kenkre, both residing at Kenkre Mansion, D.B. Marg, Near Magsons Supercentre, Miramar, Panaji Goa. ... Respondents in both petitions Mr. P. S. Lotlikar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Shivan Dessai, Advocate for the Respondent nos. 1 and 2. Mr. A. R. Kantak, Advocate for the Respondent nos. 3, 4 and 5. Coram :- A. H. JOSHI, J. Date :- 20 th JULY, 2009. ORDER : 1. Heard. Parties through Advocates agree that reason need not be recorded. In the circumstances, there shall be following order :- 3 2. In Special Civil Suit No. 56/05/B order dated 12.2.2009 passed by Civil Judge Senior Division at Panaji, is set aside. The application filed by the plaintiffs dated 26.8.2008 is hereby allowed. Upon production of documents, it would be open to both the contesting parties to lead further evidence as may be permissible in law. 3. The order passed by Civil Judge Senior Division, Panaji, in Special Civil Suit No. 56/05/B on 19.3.2009 at Exhibit 95- application dated 21.2.2009 is hereby set aside and application at Exhibit 95 is allowed. Upon production of documents, it would be open to both the contesting parties to lead further evidence as may be permissible in law. 4. Time fixed for decision of the suit is extended up to 31.10.2009. A. H. JOSHI, J. at*