1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1111 OF 2010 Stree Shikshan Sanstha, Dhule & others .. PETITIONERS VERSUS The Deputy Director of Education & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. V.D. Sapkal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mrs. A.N. Ansari, Advocate for respondent no.3. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 7th APRIL, 2010 PER COURT : 1 Parties to the petition have settled their dispute amicably. Respondent no. 3 in view of the full and final settlement of the controversy has agreed to accept amount of Rs.2,70,000/- and Demand Draft dt. 7-4-2010 for the like amount has been tendered to respondent no. 3. Respondent no. 3 is present in the court and acknowledges the receipt of Demand Draft. The terms of settlement are placed on record. Those are duly signed by respondent no. 3 as well as the representative of the management i.e. petitioner no. 2. Those are marked as 2 ‘X’ for identification. Petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 4 are present in the court and accept the correctness of the terms of the compromise deed. Concerned parties as well as their counsel have signed the terms of settlement. In this view of the matter, order impugned in this petition passed by the school tribunal on 27-11-2009 is quashed and set aside. So also the order of dismissal issued by the management on 31-1-2006 is also consequently quashed and set aside. The employee has tendered resignation. The copy thereof is annexed alongwith the terms of settlement. Respondent no. 3 in terms agrees to have tendered resignation and the management has also accepted the same. In this view of the matter, respondent no. 3 shall have no right or entitlement to the post. Instant petition stands disposed of in accordance with terms of the settlement placed on record. 2 In view of disposal of petition, pending civil application, if any, stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp1111.10.odt