1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7247 OF 2009 Koregaon Krushi Utppan Bazar Samiti .. Petitioner versus Ismail Magbul Shaikh .. Respondent Mr.S.P.Kadam for the petitioner. Mr.N.M.Gosavi & Mr.Rohan Ambekar for respondent No.1. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 1st February 2010. P.C: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has impugned order dated 24th March 2009 passed by the trial Court, the operative part of which reads thus: “1. The application Exhibit 118 is hereby allowed with costs. 2. The agreement dated 14.11.1991 between the plaintiff and the defendant is hereby exhibited and it is given Exhibit No.as Exhibit 158 and it be read in evidence as secondary evidence.” 2. The order impugned is purely interlocutory in nature which is capable of being challenged in an appeal which may be preferred by the petitioner against the decree which may be passed in the suit, if the same be adverse to the petitioner. 3. Though no case for interference at this stage is made out, it must be clarified that the issue relating to the proof of contents of document marked as Exhibit 158 and the evidential value thereof are expressly kept open. Subject to what is observed above, no case for interference is made out at this stage. Writ petition is disposed of. (A.S.OKA,J)