IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.352 of 2009 URMILA DEVI WIFE OF UMESH CHAUDHARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SAKETPURI BIBIGANJ, P.S.SADAR, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR ---PETITIONER Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM- PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME (POLICE), GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 3.THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,TIRHUT ZONE,MUZAFFARPUR 4.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MUZAFFARPUR 5.THE ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE(TOWN),MUZAFFARPUR 6.THE OFFICER INCHARTE OF SADAR POLICE STATION, MUZAFFARPUR 7.SHYAM NANDAN JHA SON OF SRI RAM BRIKSH JHA 8.SONU KUMAR JHA SON OF SHYAMNANDAN JHA 9.MONU KUMAR JHA SON OF SHYAMNANDAN JHA 10.DIPALI KUMARI DAUGHTER OF BACCHA JHA 11.MINTU KUMAR JHA SON OF PINTU JHA RESPONDENTS 7 TO 11 ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAGHUNATHPUR MADHUBAN P.S.MANIARI,DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR ----------- 7/ 10.09.2009 Heard Mr.Kailash Nath Diwakar for the petitioner, and learned Assistant counsel to Government Pleader No.1 for the respondents. It appears that the petitioner’s daughter has married respondent no.8, Sonu Kumar Jha, for which she had earlier preferred Cr.W.J.C.No. 976 of 2008 (Smt.Urmila Devi Vrs.The State of Bihar & Others), which was dismissed by a Division Bench by order dated 14.11.2008 (annexure-2). The petitioner has, thereafter, filed a criminal case at Muzaffarpur. By order dated 29.1.2009 (annexure-3), the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has directed for issuance of warrant of arrest against the said Sonu Kumar Jha. The petitioner seeks a direction from 2 this Court to the Chief Judicial Magistrate to ensure execution of the order dated 29.1.2009. It appears to us that this writ petition is an abuse of the process of the court. There is no material on record that the petitioner has taken adequate steps before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, where the main matter is pending, for execution of warrant of arrest. In that view of the matter, we do not wish to proceed with the present writ petition. It goes without saying that it will be open to the petitioner to move the court where the main matter is pending for appropriate orders including implementation of the said order dated 29.1.2009 (annexure-3), and subsequent orders. This writ petition is thus disposed of. (S.K.Katriar,J.) Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)