IN THB MI©HGOyRT OF eHHATTZSGARH AT BIL^SPtIR WRl!^J TlTIor NG^. ?>^3jT©F200§ BETITIONER VERSy® Marari Ra^ So^ of latee Sri Ramdas, aged ateout 50 years^ resident ef Qsiiartei: Noo 487^ Bistiran^ir Golliery^ permaneat resident: @f villa^es JogitoaQdfa, Tehsil $ Amblkapiar Disfct s Surguja ( C.G. ) Rg®pQNDiWg8E^ /^y / / A/^'/ ^w / .K>^y / ^M./ ^'..ey y^y •^' South Eas^ejm Goalfields Lt<a throiagh the G^ieral MQBQter^ Seepate itead^ Bilaspmr ( C^G^ ) ^ Ttie ©y^Chief Personnel Manager, S»S«G.lt»» Bishra^>iir Area^ Distt t Surfuja ( G G ) ^3, The Stib Area Manager, Jainagar, S.E,C,L» BishrajB^ur, Bis'bfe ; Sxarguja ( C,G, ) /i. Tteie Mixies Si.iperixrbendent^ Jainagai^^ 3/4 Mxies^ Bishrampia.r C^lliexy^ Mstfe : Sursruja ( C,G, ) ^ . '" WRZT SETITION UNDER ARTIGLES 226/227 OF THB CONSTITUTION OP INDIA POR ISSUANGS OF WRIT IN TH@ NATURE Or; MANQAMUS, [rp^, ff»?TJ\^ ^y^y^l CEi3E>i°iARI »••.•••:.<•::•...•: • E^;'1; ^J<^ '-^ ^^i'^rl^TW 'OTr^Ttli'^Tf^' "5^ ;^KT^T, 'S^FTS, f^QTT^3'<: M'P'^o. •^3B^ sn^r^s^C^i^^r) ^2005' i°^rw^fer w^r (8-08-200S W.P.No. 339S of200S Heard Shri V.K. Pondey, ^TRfe^ 'RFT^f ~^ fe^ I^^R '^^mH^i^r coimsel for -rtie pelitioner and Shri P.S. (Co^iy. counsel for njspondents No. 1, 2, 3 ond 4 on advonce copy. The aibmi^ion of tearv^d counsel foi* llw petitioner is that ^ie petitioner, who was w()r*<ln9 on ^ne Post 0^ Turnier in the Sou'Hi Bastem Coalfields Limited has been retired on 30-4-2005 on account of a^mpt^tkm of his age of superonnuatkwi holdin9 hte date of birth as 7-4-1945. Shri Pandey submits that this is a wrong date of birth ojf Itie petitwner and in fact the date of birlh of the petitio^er is 15-8-t955. He further ajbmits that when a dispute wa^ roised h relation to the age, his matter was referred to Kie A^e Determination Conimittee OB'K;! •the Committee has also exounm^d the case of the petitioner on 23-4-2005. He also submit^ that though the Comroittee examined the case of the pe^jtioner on 23-4-2(X% but the decision of -riie Committee wa^ not wtnmunicated to him and ut-Kmately he was superannuated on 30^-2005. Gi. PRJ—FS/350— 12/2000—50,000. 4- ari^r'^•'f^te' 'w?^^?^^ 's^ ^n^n^T, 'g^twrre', 'f^rray . W,.^o< 339^ •^?^T^^^ ( ^I^^) 11?TW ^^ ^^ -2- ^prf?riN ^iw^^ fe^ ^^^R ^'^i^r3?ii^ At this stage. leamed cojunsel for the petitioner mates a limited proyer that for the ipme being 1ftis petitiwi may be disposed of with a direclion to|the respondents to communkate the decision of Ihe Q>mmit*e^ to -Hie petitioner. He -(iirlfier prays -that if -rtie decision of -(he Commit^ee goes in favour of •the petitioner then consequen^ses of the decision may also be directed to be foltoiwed by the ije^ondents. To this limited proyer, i|iade by leamed counsel for the petitior»r, learrwd counset for tfie re^ondents, has no objection. Cbnsequently -rtie proyer j^allowed. It is hereby directed ^hat if -the Age Determination Comntittee has not taken any decision m the matl'er of the petitioner. the decision shall t|e taken by •them and -the same shall be communicated to -th^ concemed flulliorities of the respondent ond Ihe concemed 4uthorities shall communicate the souBe to -the petitioner. The the copy of •this order before stjtioner dwll be obliged to file atl the respondents and alt the obove exercise shatl be complet^d by them within a perk>d of six weeks from the date of produc^ion of copy of this order by the Gi. PRJ—FS/350—12/2000—50,000. XI-HG—78 ^IT^T'^T'f^N' "^§TT 3^^T ^-Hfi^ ^ \-: ^7 ^ ^ Gowri v 34 ^pmi^??T^^ ^3"^ ^qrqM^, '^^TT?^, f^rray ^M^o.<ilci^. ^T^"^^ (^fg^^) ^m^iT ^ft^ 3TI^T c^nse<y a<> Cert-ified copy as per rut^s, ^i^fer^'Hiwif ^ f^t I^?R ^^H3:H^¥T of the decision taken petitioner before them. The by the Cbmmittee Aall toike (t^owi course reyxrding Ihe service benefits of the petitior»r, With the aforesaid petiti^ ^tan'ids finally clisposedjof i ot)servatfon< and directions 'thc at this stage. Consequently, I.^*No.64^2/(% also stands dispoaed of. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge