CWP(T) No. 9116 of 2008 04.04.2011 Present:- Mr. Rajesh Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Addl. A.G. for the respondents No.1 & 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that respondents in the reply have taken the stand that nothing has been specifically mentioned by the petitioner as to which claim is outstanding against the temple trust. It appears since the claim was not clearly put, therefore, the respondents have not considered the case of the petitioner in the reply properly. In these circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner may be permitted to file a proper detailed representation to respondent No.2 regarding his claim and respondent No.2 may further be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within some time bound frame. The learned Additional Advocate General has no objection if the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is granted. In these circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to file detailed representation regarding his claim to respondent No.2 within a period of four weeks and in case such representation is made, then respondent No.2 shall decide the representation within a further period of two months from the date of receipt of representation by speaking order. The petitioner shall also supply a copy of this judgment to respondent No.2 alongwith representation. The petition is disposed of on above terms. April 4, 2011 ( Kuldip Singh ) (GR) Judge