IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 7TH AUGUST 2009 / 16TH SRAVANA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 4367 of 2009() -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------------- ALEX THOMAS, S/O.THOMAS, AGED 45 YEARS, C-30, JAL VAYU VIHAR, MUNDAMVELI P.O., KOCHI-682 507. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI P.CHALY RESPONDENTS: -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. S.I. OF POLICE, THOPUMPADY, ERNAKULAM. SRI. TEKCHAND, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T. SANKARAN, J. --------------------------- B.A. No. 4367 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 7th day of August, 2009 O R D E R Apprehending arrest by Sub Inspector of Police, Thoppumpady, on an accusation of having committed non bailable offence, the petitioner has filed this application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner had filed B.A. No.3776/2009, which was disposed of by the order dated 13/07/2009 by this Court. The said order reads as follows: “Apprehending arrest as he was called to the Cyber Cell, Ernakulam, this petition is filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code for Anticipatory Bail. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that though petitioner was called to the Cyber Cell to enquire on a complaint filed by his father-in-law, no crime was registered and there is no intention to arrest him as no material against the petitioner was obtained. Recording the submission the petition is dismissed.” B.A. No. 4367 / 2009 Page numbers 2. It is stated by the petitioner that after disposal of B.A. No.3776/2009, the defacto complainant had filed another complaint, putting forward the very same allegations before the Director General of Police. It is stated that the Director General of Police forwarded the petition to the Sub Inspector of Police, Thoppumpady. That is the reason why the petitioner says he has approached this Court again. 3. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the Director General of Police had forwarded the petition to the Commissioner of Police, Ernakulam, who in turn had forwarded the same to the Sub Inspector of Police, Thoppumpady. The Sub Inspector of Police called both parties and directed both of them to settle their disputes amicably. No crime is registered against the petitioner. It is also submitted that there is no intention to arrest the petitioner on the petition filed his father-in-law. The submission made by the learned Public Prosecutor is recorded and the Bail Application is closed. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE scm