1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 4116/2006 Ku. Nasimu Nisa d/o Mohd. Ramzan vs. State of Maharashtra and others. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : A.P. Lavande & R.V.More,JJ DATE : 26.9.2007 Mr. Anand Parchure, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to make representation to respondent no.3 in so far as the grievances made by the petitioner are concerned and the respondent no.3 be directed to decide the same within a reasonable time. Mr. Parchure further submits that liberty be granted to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Nagpur in case the same is adverse to the petitioner. Mr. Sambre, the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr. Paliwal, learned counsel for respondents 4 and 5 have no objection if the request made by the petitioner is allowed. In view of the above, the petitioner is permitted to make representation to the respondent no.3 within a period of two weeks to respondent no.3. In case such 2` representation is made the respondent no.3 shall decide the same on its own merits within a period of four weeks thereafter in accordance with law by following due procedure. It is made clear that all the contentions taken in the petition by the petitioner are kept open. The petition stands disposed. The parties to act upon the steno copy of this order duly authenticated by the sheristedar. Judge Judge patle