IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-28900 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: September 21, 2011 Neeru Rani & another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. L.S. Padda, Advocate, for the petitioners. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Contention has been made on behalf of the petitioners, in this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. that they got married. Respondent Nos.4 to 8, however, are not accepting the marriage and therefore are threatening the petitioners. 2. Notice of motion. 3. On the asking of the Court, Mr. B.S. Saini, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. Three copies of the petition have been handed over to him. Crl. Misc. No. M-28900 of 2011 [2] 4. At this stage, Mr. Atun Jain, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.4. 5. Respondent No.4, Baldev Raj, father of petitioner, Neeru Rani is present in Court as identified by his lawyer Mr. Atun Jain, Advocate. Respondent No.4 states that he or his family members shall not cause any harm to the petitioners. 6. In view of the stand of the private respondent, no further direction is required to be issued. 7. The petition is accordingly disposed of. 8. In case, at a later stage, if the petitioners perceive any serious threat from the private respondents, they would be at liberty to approach the Incharge of the concerned Police Station, who shall ensure protection of life and liberty of the petitioners. (AJAI LAMBA) September 21, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?