1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1010/2008 (Vijayu Purushottam Raut & others VERSUS The State of Mah. & another) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Mr. Kalbande, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : MARCH 7, 2008. Heard. The writ petition is directed against the impugned notice of election dated 11.02.2008 issued by the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Region, in which the procedure in respect of submission of nomination form, scrutiny and the date of election of members of Nagpur Metropolitan Planning Committees is mentioned. Considered the contention canvassed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the text of the impugned notice of election. The notice of election merely shows the modalities and procedure to be followed by the candidates who had to submit their nomination papers as well as the date of election including the date on which the scrutiny of nomination papers is to be conducted. In that view of the matter, no case is made 2 out by the petitioner, hence, the writ petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE APTE