WPSS No.1779 of 2011 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Shri I.P. Kohli, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Anil Bisht, learned Brief Holder for the State/ respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that during last fifteen months, the petitioner has been transferred to nine different places, once on administrative ground and eight times in public interest. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that by frequent transfer orders, the petitioner has infact been harassed by the authorities. The frequent transfer orders are against the Transfer Policy of the State Government. He further submitted that the petitioner is going to retire in the month of August, 2012 and as per the transfer policy of the State Government, the petitioner could be transferred at any of the three options of his choice. Petitioner gave his representation on 10.10.2011, mentioning therein the options of his choice for his posting, but the respondents have not considered the same. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the Chief Conservator of Forest, Garhwal Region, Dehradun to consider and take decision on the representation of the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of the order. It is provided that till the disposal of the representation of the petitioner, the impugned transfer order dated 07.10.2011, shall be kept in abeyance. Stay application (CLMA No.12970 of 2011) also disposed of. ( V.K. Bist , J.) Arpan 13.12.2011