1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 522 0F 2010 *** Yunus Sardar Patel Versus The State of Maharashtra and others *** 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule, made returnable forthwith, heard finally with the consent of the parties. 3. Petitioner has raised a grievance in this writ petition. In view of the earlier order, of this Court, this petition is taken up for final hearing. 4. Learned A.G.P. has filed reply affidavit which is sworn in by one Mr. Tukaram Sonawane, Block Development Officer. In this affidavit, para 7, statement is made that the appeal filed by the present Respondent Nos.4 and 5 is already heard by the learned Divisional Commissioner on 6th February, 2010 and matter may be concluded at the earliest. Petitioner's grievance is that elections of the members of Village Panchayat is likely to be processed within one month. He, therefore, seeks early disposal of the matter by the learned Divisional Commissioner. Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 and 5 submits that the matter is finally heard and the learned Division Commissioner may pass 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. appropriate order. 5. In the facts and circumstances, Respondent No.2 is directed to decide and dispose of the appeal on or before 17th of March, 2010. 6. Petition is partly allowed and disposed of and rule is made absolute in above terms. without any order as to costs. [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.] Dated:25/02/2010. ans/522