IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.16642 OF 2011 NIKHIL PANDEY, S/O SHRI KRISHNA NAND PANDEY, R/O VILLAGE BIHRA, POLICE STATION PACHGACHHIYA, DISTRICT SAHARSA. …………………PETITIONER. VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR. …………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 03/ 11.08.2011 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. Considering the fact that the petitioner’s prayer for bail was earlier allowed by this court on 07.12.2009 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 42305 of 2009 on a condition that his criminal antecedent must not exceed of being accused in more than one case but that the petitioner being accused in three cases, could not be released on bail in view of the conditions imposed in aforementioned order dated 07.12.2009. Counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the petitioner has remained in custody for a period of over two years and that the trial has made no progress. That being so when petitioner was even earlier found to be entitled for grant of bail by this Court in its order dated 2 7.12.2009, it would now direct for release of the petitioner, namely, Nikhil Pandey on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Araria in connection with Narpatganj P.S Case no. 50 of 2007, subject to the following three conditions:- i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioner will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and his absence even for a single day would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of his bail. (iii) The petitioner in case is now made accused in any other criminal case that would itself lead to cancellation of his bail. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)