IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2941 of 2010 SHAMBHU PASWAN, Son of Puranchand Paswan, R/o Bhimpur, P.S. Bhimpur, District Supaul …… Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR …. Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Arun, Advocate For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, A.P.P. ----- 3 19.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he had been made accused in this case by the informant only on the basis of suspicion that he used to talk to the girl and she was missing. However, it is submitted that during the course of investigation it has come that the girl was alone seen moving towards the station by witnesses and it has also come that she had gone to Pathankot and Kashmir with co-accused Md. Fakruddin who used to supply milk on the tea shop of the petitioner. Only on that basis the petitioner has been made accused. Learned 2 counsel further submits that none of the witnesses have stated that the petitioner was also seen in company with that girl at the time or thereafter when girl is stated to become missing. Petitioner is stated to be in custody since 2.11.2009. Learned counsel for the State submitted that this petitioner has been made a suspect by the informant on the basis that he used to talk with the girl on mobile phone. It has also come during the course of investigation that on-accused Md. Fakhruddin was also missing and he was seen with the girl at Pathankot and perhaps gone to Kashmir. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, SHAMBHU PASWAN,, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 108 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the 3 concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the petitioner. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)