IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35105 of 2010 BADAL YADAV @ BADAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- 03. 23.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Recovery of dead boy of unknown could be identified of one Tepu Sah. Petitioner’s name appeared in confession made by co-accused Sunil Kumar Yadav and further suspicion cast by deceased’s father and other family members, may not be made basis for refusal of anticipatory bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No.154 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)