IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 630 OF 2011 SHRI DAYANAND AMONKAR ... Petitioner Versus CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PANAJI AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Sardesai, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shivan Dessai, Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE & U. V. BAKRE, JJ. Date:- 16th November, 2011 P.C. Affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. 2. In view of the statements made in the affidavit, the main cause of action as regards the allotment of the premises, does not survive since the respondents have agreed to allot the two premises identified in the affidavit. 3. Mr. Lotlikar, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner states that the respondents be directed to hand over the possession of the said premises within the certain time-frame. 4. Mr. Dessai, learned Counsel for the respondents states that the two premises mentioned in the affidavit-in-reply would be allotted to the petitioner within a period of one month subject to the petitioner handing over the possession of the premises presently occupied by the petitioner to the respondents. The statement made by Mr. Dessai is accepted. 5. Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. U. V. BAKRE, J. SMA