RFA No.7297 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.7297 of 2011 (O&M). Date of decision:18.11.2011 Maya Singh ....Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) RFA No.7298 of 2011 (O&M) Ram Singh and others ....Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) RFA No.7299 of 2011 (O&M) Smt. Bharpai and others ....Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) RFA No.7300 of 2011 (O&M) Jilo Devi and another ....Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) RFA No.7301 of 2011 (O&M) Parkashi Devi and others ....Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) RFA No.7302 of 2011 (O&M) Nar Singh and others ....Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) RFA No.7297 of 2011 (O&M) 2 RFA No.7303 of 2011 (O&M) Mahender Singh and another ....Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) RFA No.7304 of 2011 (O&M) Ram Singh and others ....Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) RFA No.7305 of 2011 (O&M) Preeta ....Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) RFA No.7306 of 2011 (O&M) Sewa Singh and others ....Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) RFA No.7307 of 2011 (O&M) Miyan Singh and others ....Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) RFA No.7308 of 2011 (O&M) Kreshni Devi and others ....Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? RFA No.7297 of 2011 (O&M) 3 Present: Mr. S.S.Malik, Advocate for the appellant(s). * * * RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL) This judgment shall dispose of 12 appeals i.e. RFA Nos.7297 to 7308 of 2011, which have arisen out of one common award of the Additional District Judge, Karnal dated 13.01.2010. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant has very fairly stated that these appeals are liable to be dismissed in view of the judgment of this Court dated 29th July, 2011 passed in RFA No.1788 of 2011 titled as Rohtash and others vs. State of Haryana and others. In view of the stand taken by counsel for the appellant, these appeals are ordered to be dismissed. Since appeals are dismissed on merits, the question of condoning the delay does not survive. A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other connected cases. November 18, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) savita JUDGE