IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.28543-M of 2010 Date of Decision:14.2.2011 Sukhdev Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Ms. Gurveen H. Singh, Addl. A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The applicant-Sukhdev Singh has moved this telegram to this Court alleging that he be saved from the hands of Paramdeep Singh Gill, DGP, Punjab, on the allegation that Mr. Paramdeep Singh Gill DGP was bent upon to eliminate him and his family and further bent upon to involve him in a case under Section 302 IPC in which the applicant is complainant and the said case is pending before Sessions Judge, Faridkot for 17.9.2010 titled as State v. Gurbachan Singh and others. The said telegram has been taken up on judicial side and treated as criminal miscellaneous petition. Upon notice, reply has been filed on behalf of respondent-State submitting therein that case titled as State v. Gurbachan Singh and others for the offence under Section 302 IPC had already been decided by the Court of Sh. Fatehdeep Singh, District and Sessions Judge, District Faridkot in which Gurbachan Singh and others were convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for life. The said judgment dated 22/24.9.2010 is attached Crl. M. No.28543-M of 2010 -2- alongwith the reply as Annexure R-1. It is further submitted in the reply that the petitioner is a hardened criminal and about 17 criminal cases stand registered against him. In view of the above, the apprehension of the petitioner that he may be involved in a case titled as State v. Gurbachan Singh and others is ill founded. The accused in the said case have since been convicted for the life imprisonment. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. 14.2.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE