IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.3900 of 1987 Date of Decision:9.11.2011 Baldev Singh alias Bihari and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Kannan Present: None. Mr. S.S. Sahu, A.A.G. Punjab. **** K. KANNAN, J.(Oral) There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. There is dispute with reference to water course of sanctioned between the petitioners and second respondent. The counsel for the State says that second respondent has made a statement on 11.4.2011 and the same has been recorded by Zilledar Sahib Baghapurana that she has installed her own tubewell and she will not raise any objection against the petitioner securing the course of the channel in the manner that he has sought for in the writ petition. The counsel has produced the copy of the statement duly attested by Zilledar Sahib Baghapurana. The same is taken on record. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the impugned orders are set aside in terms of the statement made by the second respondent. 9.11.2011 ( K. Kannan ) rajeev Judge