^@:%jiiiillli © S.B. Arisine from district BILASPUR ^) INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.A. (Cl N0- °53^- /2007 Appeal valued Rs. 3, 67,336.00 Court affixed Rs. 300-^ (^ APPELLANTs RESPONDENTSs^ Gopi Singh Rathore, aged 50 years, son of Shri Hinchha Ram, resident of Girwar, tehsil & post office Pendraroad (Gaurela), district Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). (Claimant) VERSUS ^(1) The Chhattisgarh State Electricity ys.cs,\sr&£0- ^-c°^ ~1^^ yj.""."" ^. c^ ^' " ' . ^ Board, through the Secretary, Head office Daganiya, Raipur (C.G.), (2) The Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, through the Chief Engineer, Bilaspur (C.G.), • ^ ,. (3) The Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, through the Additiorial ^ ^^ ^ Superintending Engineer (Distribution ^fy ^(^\^ division) Pendraroad, district Bilaspur .^?-yr (C-G-)-.. ^, <4) The Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, through the Junior Engineer (Rural), Electricity Supply Centre, Pendraroad, district Bilaspur (C.G.). (Non-appUcant) APPEAL UNDER SUB-CLAUSE (a) OF SUB-SECTION (1) OF SECTION 30 OF THE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT. 1923. ^ ^ '2^, HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH : BILASPUR M. A. (C) No. 937 of 2007 Appellant Gopi Singh Rathore Versus Respondents The Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board & others DB: Hon'ble Mr. I. M. Quddusi, & Hon^ble Mr. Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, JJ. 'p, None for the appellant. Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate for the respondents. ORDERtorall ( Passed on this 29th day ofApril, 2011) The list is being revised. The case is called out again. No one is ,/ present to press this appeal. Since no one is present for the appellant, we have no other option except to dismiss the instant appeal for non-prosecution. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- LM.Quddusi Judge »..--s"—' Thakur