IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 30TH MAY 2011 / 9TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 14340 of 2011(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- RADHAMANY, AGED 45 YEARS, D/O. PUSHPAVALLY AMMA, CHANDRA VILASAM VEEDU, VENKULAM MURI, EDAVA VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.ANIL KUMAR SRI.AJITH MURALI RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE CIRCILE INSPECTOF OF POLICE, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3. SASIDHARAN NAIR, ADAPPINAKATHU VEEDU, VENKULAM MURU, EDAVA VILLAGE, EDAVA (P.O.), CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY G.P. SRI.T.K. VIPINDAS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 - A TRUE COPY OF INVITATION LETTER OF THE PETITIONER'S DAUGHTER'S MARRIAGE. EXT.P2 - A TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 24/5/2011 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. R. BASANT & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 14340 of 2011-N ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT Basant,J. The petitioner - a woman aged 45 years, has come to this Court with this petition for issue of directions under Art.226 of the Constitution to respondents 1 and 2 to afford protection to the petitioner for the peaceful and orderly conduct of the wedding of the daughter of the petitioner on 2/6/11 and the wedding party to be held on 31/5/11. 2. According to the petitioner, all arrangements have been made for the wedding of the daughter. The 3rd respondent is threatening to illegally obstruct the peaceful conduct of the wedding on 2/6/11 and the wedding party on 31/5/11. 3. There was a Vanitha Swyam Sahaya Sangham. The said Sangham owes liabilities to the Bank. The 3rd respondent's wife is also a member of the Sangham. The 3rd respondent wants the petitioner to discharge the entire liability to the creditor. As the petitioner is unable to do the same, she is being threatened that the marriage of her daughter will be illegally obstructed. 4. The matter came up for admission hearing on 27/5/11. W.P.(C) No. 14340 of 2011 -: 2 :- Notice was ordered to the respondents. The 3rd respondent has been served. There is no appearance for the 3rd respondent. 5. We are satisfied, in these circumstances, that the petitioner's prayer can be allowed. There is absolutely no indication to suggest that there is any other reason for the apprehended obstruction on the part of the 3rd respondent. 6. The learned Government Pleader submits that Ext.P2 complaint has been received by the police and necessary action shall be taken to afford protection for the petitioner. 7. This writ petition is, in these circumstances, allowed. Respondents 1 and 2 are directed to afford adequate and sufficient police protection to the petitioner for the peaceful and orderly conduct of the marriage of the daughter of the petitioner on 2/6/11 and the wedding party to be held on 31/5/11. 8. Hand over a copy of this judgment to the learned counsel for the petitioner. Sd/- R. BASANT (Judge) Sd/- K. SURENDRA MOHAN (Judge) Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge