BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANT: M.C.C..r?.^./.../2010CS.B) 'Smt.Sarvjeet Pathak W/o-Ajay Pathak now ^_ aged about 38 years R/o- Q. No. 24/B, \(w^'^y's.. Avenue- B,Sec.l Bhilai Tehsil and District ^--.^f-S^ " Durg (Chhattisgarh). !,n-^»" ..\^1 ^•" ^^' VERSUS ^•" NON-APPLICANT --Surendra Kumar Jain S/o Sona Pal Jain 'R/o Azmera Traders ,shop no.306,307 Zonal Market , Sec.IO Bhilai Nagar, Bhilai Tehsil & Distt- Durg (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF F.A.65/2010 DISMISSED IN DEFAULT ON 30:^.2010. T XI-HC—78 ^ T -^ww^, ynly'Ko, fqdiyy, sil^l 'VR; ('yl^'^) 3v^v ^ii R-fi+ mTs^giiTOi' Sahu 'RTOTC ^fS^ «1^I S.B. Hon'Me Shri Justice N.K. Adarwrf 02.07.2610 Ms. Rani Pathak, Advocate for appBcant. application for resl|oRrtton of FA No. 65fi01©. for the applicant submits that co|tikl not appear @n aecount af F^ No. ^/2010, wNch was (•estwed to Its original fite. Heard on Leamed counsel appearing| the counsel for the appellant bonafide mistake, therefore, dismissed on 30.04.2010, may be On due consideration, 1 anfr appellant Is succeeded in e)q>lair|lng therefore, the applieation is allojwed restored to its orlginal THe. A copy of this order be appeal and the same be llsted fo< weeks. ^Rfe-Ffri iTFtRtf 'cf fSIA •!^R?R ^•atRmail^T satisfied that the counsel for fhe cause of hls absence, and PA No. 65^018 te pltwsed on record of the origlnal hearing immediately after two Sd/- N.K.Agarawal Judge