[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.1061 OF 2007 1. Govind Pandurang Choudhari 2. Kewal Govind Choudhari Both r/o Dombivali (E) At present on bail ..Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.Sudeep Pasbola advocate for applicants Mr.K.V.Saste A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : APRIL 17, 2007 DATE : APRIL 17, 2007 DATE : APRIL 17, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Pasbola the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants have been granted bail. While granting bail, a condition was imposed on the applicants that they shall not enter Thane and Dombivali. The applicants had earlier preferred applications for modification of the conditions of bail before this Court. The said applications came to be rejected. The applicants have now again approached this Court for relaxation of the [-2-] condition that they shall not enter Thane and Dombivali. 3. The learned A.P.P. on instructions states that the trial is going on. Four witnesses have already been examined and now another six witnesses remained to be examined. Hence, it is stated that in such circumstances, the condition may not be relaxed. Looking to the fact that the trial is going on and almost half number of witnesses have already been examined, I am not inclined to relax the said condition at this stage. The trial Court shall endeavour to dispose of the trial by 16.7.2007. The jail authority and police authority shall ensure that accused are produced in the trial Court on all the dates. 4. Application is disposed of. [Smt. V.K.Tahilramani, J.]