!\ ?i > f v /- •^..-...-.-— IH THE HIGH COURT Op JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR WRIR PETITION N0._^^ OF l999» (WRIT PETITION TJNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) PETITIONER: GURCHARAN SlNOi HORA, S/o Shri Ajifc Singh»age<3 about 38 years^ Incharge ExecutiveEngineer (MechanicaD^ Raipur Development Authorifcy, Raipur (H^P^)^ //yersus// RESPONDENTS! s  -N; 1. ^ State of Ma<3hya Pradesh througb Secretary, Housing & ^nvironment Depa^tinent^ Vallabh Bhawan^ BHOPAL (MP)^ !^ Raipur Development Authority^ a body inccrporated under Section 39 of the Hagar Tatha Oram Nivesh Adhiniyam,1973^ having its office at G,E^Road, Raipur(MP)^ ^3^ The Chairraan, Raipur Development Authority^ Raip^r (M<P»)^ fs^ 4«. The Chief Execut ive Off ice r,» Raipur Development Authority^ Raipur (M.P<,)< f^-^. P.R* Narang,Executive Engineer (Civil), Raipur Development Aufchority^ Raipur, Distt.R^ipur (MP)* , ^££_PETITIONmm2R ARTICLE 226/227 Qp TME CONSTITUTION OF II®IA —78 ^T^T'^T'^fhF '<TO 311^¥T^RJ^ < ^ 'S'SEf T^NI<n<M, ^•cTl'y^Ko, f®!<r!T'93< .te.^:...i.^..^ NSNdl ^tn^-" <"— y -^ ^ 200 ^TI^T Tra^ (^qi^^) ITCTW^f^^^^ <sni<if<n<i1i ^R^ft ^f ft^ <Pn<^« ^^tRR3^T S.B.: JUSTICE MR. 23-09-2010: None for the petitioner. Ku. Pragya Singh, counselj Since none appears for th,4 petitioner even in the second round, this court has no other optlon bi|t to dismiss the writ petltlon for want ofprosecution. Accordingiy, the writ p prosecution. for respondents No. 2 to 4. &tltion Is dismlssed for want of Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge