1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7245 OF 2009 Dilip S/o Harakchand Jain and Another. ... Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. ... Respondents. -------- Miss. Surekha Mahajan, Advocate for petitioners. Smt. A.V. Gondhalekar, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATE: 7th NOVEMBER 2009 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The petitioners claim to be members of the Trust. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that there are two groups in the management. If the petitioners have any 2 grievance regarding wrong implementation of the reservation policy, it could be brought to the notice of the appropriate authorities. 3) The writ petition is disposed of. (K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.7245.09