: 1 : CRA-511-10=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.511 OF 2010 Kanta Tejus Maun .. Applicant v/s. Tejas Kanubhai Maun .. Respondent ......... Mr. A.V. Chatuphale for the applicant Mr. R.T. Lalwani for the respondent ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 17th MARCH, 2011 P.C. : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the respondent. Looking to the nature of the petition, it is clear that the petitioner is challenging more than one order in this petition and that too by filing the Civil Revision Application. Perusal of the record shows that the Civil Revision Application is not maintainable. After hearing this expression, learned Counsel for the petitioner applies for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings so as to challenge the order which is operating against the petitioner. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn. Petitioner to pay the respondent token costs of Rs.2,000/- for filing this petition. Cost condition precedent for further proceedings. Liberty as prayed for is granted. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)