IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.944 OF 2009 Kishan Narayan Keni and another. ... Petitioners Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others. ... Respondents Mr. D.H. Mehta with Mr. D.D. Mehta i/by M/s. D.M. Legal Associates for the petitioners. Ms. Geeta Jogalekar for the BMC. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 29TH JULY, 2009 P.C. The learned counsel appearing for the Corporation submits that the impugned order has been passed after hearing the petitioners. However, the competent authority would not mind hearing the petitioners again and petitioners may even produce the registered agreement in their favour. However, the leaned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners claim of ownership has already been accepted by the Corporation from time to time and they will produce registered agreement or in the alternative photo copy of the registered agreement to which the Corporation will be at liberty to verify and whatever other documents are in their power and possession during the course of hearing. 2. We, therefore, remand the matter to the competent authority which shall hear the petitioners and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks from today. The Corporation will be free to pass such order on the documents which are produced before the Corporation but we do indicate that the Corporation would keep in mind the earlier reports and the affidavits where they have accepted the petitioners or their attorney's right. Petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid terms. CHIEF JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.