IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1423 of 2006 RAMAUTAR PRASAD Versus RAM JANKI SHARAN & ORS ----------- 2. 19.11.2008 Surendra/ No one appears for the defendant-tenant- petitioner. It is only vexations attitude of the petitioner that an eviction suit filed in the year 1999 is still pending for final disposal. The impugned order takes note of such plea and has held that audacity the defendant tenant is exceeded to such an extent that he had come out with a prayer to lead certain document in evidence about which not a trace much less reference was made in the written statement or in the application seeking leave to contest the suit. The plea of illness of the wife for delaying in recording of evidence also has been gone into. This Court would not find that there is any jurisdictional error on the part of the court below in passing of the impugned order. Normally in absence of stay order it is expected that the eviction suit must have proceed. This Court would, therefore, while dismissing this civil revision application, direct the court below to ensure that the eviction suit of the year 1999 gets disposed of within a period of three months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)