IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16294 of 2011 RAJNANDAN SINGH Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3 01.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. It appears from perusal of the record that the alleged occurrence took place in the year, 1991 and case of the petitioner was committed to the court of sessions in the year, 1996. It would further appear that the petitioner was granted bail and he attended the trial court regularly till the year, 1999 and after that, representations were made on behalf of the petitioner. Though the trial court had directed the petitioner to appear physically for framing of charge and lastly, on 25.07.2002, the bail bonds of the petitioner was cancelled and subsequently, on 05.04.2011, the petitioner could be remanded in the present case from another case. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that even if the aforesaid fact assumed to be true, then also the petitioner attended the court from 1991 to 1996, near about 8 years but his trial could not be concluded. It is further contended by him that being fed up with the aforesaid delay, the petitioner entrusted his pairvi to his counsel who regularly filed representations before the court below and did not inform the direction of the court to the petitioner, as a result of which, his bail bonds was 2 cancelled and after cancellation of the bail of the petitioner, no process was served upon the petitioner. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Rajnandan Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sessions Trial No. 1133 of 1996 arising out of Bihta P.S. Case No. 40 of 1991 to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Danapur subject to condition that one of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner and shall be holder of landed property and furthermore, the petitioner shall attend the trial court for the period of nine months in person on each and every date and if he fails to do so on three consecutive dates, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)