CES g g/gonwcmyamNagcvoeggx QUWFE MPT l &no¢=mt-c .aJcsAsS9gc;;FyEw~scHE aULE m. aunrr mass ACT 1am. @@ v Sing!em IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARI-I AT BILASPUR (C.G.1 CR. M. P. No. C67?// 20:0 ACQUITTAL APPEAL No. / 201Q APPLICANT/ State of Chhattisgarh, APPELLANT Through the District Magistrate District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS NON-APPLICANT Ramratan, RESPONDET S/ o Gariba Yadav @ Ajuwa Yadav, N Aged about —35 years, R/o Chorbhatthi, P.S. Pathariya, & District Bilaspur (G.G.) APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 378131 AND MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37811! OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: 1973. HEGH CQiIRl‘ Q”? 'L‘HH&TTE§G$R£€ AT EELA$PUR $3 : HGN’ELEE‘; EVER. L?'{§%§’ \ A?PELLAN’§‘ x mSPfbNBENT CGEE The yresan t patirjc agaiiasf abs: Biiaspuz‘ in responéen ti ac 2. Bm‘ef facts of $2.6 I‘egpmxdeEi! a hers‘eif ahiazg. ainst‘ f 306 LDC. After inves‘a'ga 8. SO as to h has examiaad accussedf r€spondant Cr. P. C. guiaaded. hi5: €11 which immcs Sasaionsg CU$€ - CaSr: ccnsai namaiy L Cm. the basiis .E'EE l‘fi‘S ragistered ag affi 6a ,‘ 0} , p011 dani; accu {ioni cg; 02d $116 aceusad} respomiant guilty as many aé; was also r ;11$ :lca mid 7"” Smtf: of Ch hattiSgarh VEISES‘ 1% ffj app€31en i, LEA m V * m? igw? “ E EAgggis 3?&{32§_~ME$§Q Pm?“ w CEEME§$ bE -- AF u APEWJCATIQE FOR GR 9F PPE£ ‘M.Lmm JvDGMEm g23.a2.2013; 13 which I'mpwgnw ordm by ihe Second Ad‘di‘n-‘ionai is barraéd {n limft’a‘i‘ion 511?} jmfgmegxf (E SsSSiens Tva‘ éffrd (37.04.2036 Judgg g'Pvrvi}: acqumiug rL Siacf‘iaus 8Q§ of thé'. that on 15. 12. 200$, g stir} an .22 E IF; H? EXPj4 “7% £h§an was fijad an 3 N0, ' 21,;2009 d. of 6.26: GfiFEiace zmdér (i Eai commimegi suicik hy s€fi5 ‘ xxmérg intimatiem F" umde‘r $ecfian 2 ¢i 25)0§. km? pmsw army Stammmu of the a 0f the. gtéd agaigst him a11d .n fhs: (33% 15 witnesS‘asV scorcied undm‘ denimi 13% charges ah‘i: Stecfion 3}.“ Amisz: implicgrist}. £3 direciéd yaSsW} Vu?geh Dimzic: .d€ )‘PC. Wife. 0f m6: MNM fé'CE ym’i‘? 1% N Sim” Pravemi Des, Dy. AN $L LW R $E Ramra tan “.‘w'... \ C&.M.P.i§€l 697i2€§19 w Emggwa 4. Axfer nearmcr tn; wariies fha tm'aj Cam”? has acquiimd ‘E‘ne accaqadflesnomki t of the oif 11cc ab memwnt‘é abqVe. I-ievc present petitimi. 5. Contantion of Cshri Das. i§ thaf de<spit5 Qufiicient eviiisnca available 01 TecmY f0 4cm“ PiFa‘t 1mm the (JeaEa3m1 was subje to . i’ha Court bei‘ow has az'rai in Law ‘ CG mung the rvqpon'ieAJaccus . e s1 bmlfS that thg, mgr d1€nf§ di $60 {K3 are cieauv magi ut agaHmL the reqmm em! awhseci, w i' 6. Maihum D;ratéad {PV‘L—E fathar 9f thé ciECaitasairi has ”Kong ‘ stated That her d xlghim‘ was suh§€ctad to cyuaky bv 1 accusaii anpviiant and ThEV ’ilseri $0 quarts} with frach othtir but 11g ha% aha afimiftFd Th; fact ‘ma h? was nnt m taAxmo tems mm his daughmr mid shs was boycotisd by 1;};Le somaty for 116:1 C(mauct. He. has alsa a(1mitfed the f‘zc‘ “lat ‘Lhe fzipor? wa$ lctkgaci if; ms pah'ca $fation about one, mainh afibr thé: dsa‘th of his (:‘a‘aughrm‘. Duburm Bai {P.W,-’2) mo’rhar of ihs {iaccaSed has sfatedL Ehai marrEaga of rim &€ceas€<‘2 was performed with tha msgmnéétrxfjaccxwmi m‘zdar local} cuatoms howevaz‘, i: tmms meV quamelt‘u wxm em‘h omei axni. at times {awe {mad to bi: comgammisa befwean them. This; wimeSS ha$ also admitted the fact {ha‘i $11!: déceased was Mjvcotmd “£10111 th? soci6ty afmr mardag; anéi she. ngver usafi t0 came. to hear housxa. 3m, has further arimittai t‘m fi‘ct that €116 decaasad 3i, ms m‘spondsnffacmwad wara having om: fsmaje chiid 33d fhm‘é: was; $01116 dispute with me IPSEww‘; 3tfaccuss€L 01:: account Q1" 1w? rscommzg me x30 $6 m 1116, Lamt‘ L ha daughter. Prém f 111x133 : {Y J .Jxvi— ‘ 3'; has ‘ i {i mat he was infm‘maé by fim deCEasad that Elm accusaifa ‘9 Rant hat? 2o: 6 ‘i‘e Haryana m $5 a ciecezm 1 howwar she maxxageck to 'retum and thei‘eafaer she Ned wfh The qceueeril; vehnond‘en‘t, Mamfa Dubey (P‘Wsl 'r} 1:3.{iy CimS‘ta‘ble who reeorded “1e mac mumanan was %tme!i Lhat T1“e we m} Jqueet the v\ rm sees Eave mmemed he? i11m fhe deceNsec? bad sui‘iev d b11111 J mjum’es Whii‘e coekmg face; ana‘ a: Ln; are 0f L s :he wetmx he: and mower P? {he deceasea wexe ruse pixsenT Shx }s<: sig 1 vu n $81“ she mack men: ermuir‘; aw me allegatian whatsoever was a enmity and wa$ left Witin no othar Oytimrl but I‘o commit sui 1 Iavaiied by them against the raspam‘nmxa’accusei‘i. ”F715: 0%he1‘ witnasses Elavs net mada any aHagatimx agamst the raSpanzisn‘t agad thair evideace iS mat of much siguificance. ? Consicialmg ail ‘316 facts ami agmcts 9f €116 {3%. Yé’K: C911}? beiow has amveii t0 a cmxchmign of acquitiéng the :‘eSpGEdanig’ accumxi . 8. I fszui no mamrl to inmrfere in i116 jwigméni 0f acguitmi pax‘ticularly fha viaw takan bv the com? balaw '3 one. Cf ihve 130Ssibi€ View. It i$ a. sstfleé yosifim} of 13w i1} rdadoz} t0 caSEts agaiilsf, acquizfaL in a petiticm agamst acq_1itfal if two vréaws ars p<msfhl€ m1 the ba$is 6f tha avideace 16d hy 13m proSacufien apx the frial Cmu‘t taking one View Eiavoursc% me. accimwi; :*&V61‘$im1 0f firm fuximg$ of acquittal by th§ agxpaiiattt Court taking {Em othér ‘91aus1bka Vi€W énto consideration is not pm‘missihle in law am} themfm‘e i'his Cmzg‘t is Cf th€ cansidgred opinioa that the judgmézit img‘mgnx'ié acquittmg the respandentjaccused offaa 0ff€nc€ as ajlaged is fast 31d ismgmn Accc-rdmgiy. th€ 1mm: as sough: far hv the appiicaj1t fm' :‘sgisa‘atiaa of apyeai ageing tht: jadgmem cf acauitia} is hemhy refasad 0n the szmunci Gf Eimifatic a as weE as m1 marits, Pritinker Diwaker Judge Sd/— .