bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.916 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Kakad Property Developers ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 25TH AUGUST, 2009 P.C. Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal. 2. The Tribunal, in its order, has taken a view reading as under: 6................. In any case, once the asset is held to be a stock in trade of the assessee, provisions of Section 55A are not applicable as the same apply to determination of income from capital gains. In the case of the assessee, the profit on sale of office premises was held to be a business income and once it is being assessed under the head “profits from business”, the provisions of section 55A are not applicable. During the course of hearing before us, a question was put to the learned DR as to the date when the matter was referred to DVO u/s. 55A of the Act, against which the valuation report was received on 22nd September, 2003. Despite our query, the learned DR was unable to reply the same.” 3. Reading of the aforesaid finding would go to show that the matter was referred for valuation, against which a valuation report was received and the provisions of Section 55A of the Act were not applicable. The view taken by the Tribunal, is a reasonable and possible view. No fault can be found with the same. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine for want of substantial question of law. No order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)