s1; fflGH CQT.mT QFCHHATTJSGARHATBILASPm PK-TITIONERS Wiit.PetitiOT]L{SlNo,3172of2C^ L Bhagwat Prasad Sidar S/o Parasram aged 57 years address Priman7 School Taga Tahsil Akaltara District Jaiijgir Champa (CG), 2. Bhtiratiai Sahoo S/o Ghasiram aged 50 years, Asstt. Teacher Primaiy School Hardi R//o Hardi P.S. Balouda Tahsil Balouda District Janjgir Champa (CG). 3. Bhakaloo Ram Kaiwart S/o Bhulauram address Primaiy School Raimond, Parsada Head Master R//o Nariyara, P.S. & Tahsil Pamgarh District Janjgir Champa(CG). 4. Jawahar Singh S/o Judawan Singh aged 50 years A^ddress: Govt. Higher Secondaty School Bawali Block Development Pathariya Tahsil Mungeli Distt. Bilaspur(CG). 5. Khuboo Ram Suryavanshi S/o Ghasiya Ram aged 52 years Address: Primaiy School Kirari, Block Development Maltara Distt. Janjgir Champa (CG). 6. Radhe Shyam Patel S/o Shiv Prasad Patel, aged 54 vears. Address Primar/ School Jelar Block Development Pamgarh Distt. Janjgir Champa (CG). 7. Sitaram Sahoo S/o Makhanlal Sahu aged 59 years Address: Boys Primaiy Schoo! Nariyara Tahsil Akaitara, District Janjgir Champa (CG). 8. Sosiau RamNirmalkar S/o Sadhuram aged 55 years, Address : Primar/ School Jhalmala Block Dcvelopment Akaltara Distiict Janjgir Champa (CG). 9. Vijai Singh S/'o Judawan Singh aged 54 years Address Primaiy School Usalapur, Block Development Takhatpur Distt. Bilaspur (CG). VERSUS BE8PQ ^TS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, School Education Development, DKS Bhawan,Ratpur(CG). 2. District Education Officer, Jaiijgir Champa (CG). 3. Block Education Officer, Block Janjgir Champa, Distt. JanJgir Champa (CG). (W^TV PETmON TJNDBR ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE, CONSTTTTJHON OF INDIA) (SB: Hoii'Me Mr. Satlsh K. Agiiihotri, J.) Present : Sliri 8.K Mishra, A^dvocate for the petitioners. Sliri M^P.S. Bhatia, Dq?uty Govt Advocate for the State/respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 25th day ofJinie, 20(^) With the consent of the parties, the matter is tafcen up for hearing fisially. "5^ 1. The petitioners were appomted as A^ssistant Teachers on fixed pay of P.s. 100A. AAer completiosi ofU¥oyears ofprobation period, they were granted regular pay scale. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the issiie involved m the case is. asto whether, the petitioners are eirtitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date mitial appomtiiieiit or after completion ofprobation period. 2. The issue invoived, herein was considered bythe Madhya Pradesh State Admmistrath?e Tribuna!, Jabalpur m OA. No. 2745/89 (Madhukaiit Yadu and 56 others Vs. State ofM.P. & others), wherem it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. Tlie matter was takeii up to Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petifion (Civil)No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon^ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistasit Teachers ai'e entitled to regular pay scale fi'om date ofmitial appointaient. 3. Iii view ofthe above stated submissions made by leamed coytisel for the pailies, the writ petition is disposed of m the same temis i.e. the petitioners are gmsited !ibe!wb/ to make a represeiitatioii, if so advised, to consider their case, ifthey staiid on the same footisigs as per order dated 24.08.1992 by the Madhya Pradesli State Admmistrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, in OA. No. 2745 of 89 Madhukmit Yadu (supra) aiid subsequently coiifiniiedbyorderdated 03.01.1994 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93 asid grant relief accordiiig!y. 4. In view ofthe foregoing, this petitiosi is disposed of. No order asto costs. Thakor Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge