IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 10TH DECEMBER 2010 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1346 of 2010(S) ---------------------------------------------- [THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.34490/2009 DATED 02/12/2009] .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- P.L.ELSIE, AGED 68 YEARS, W/O.LATE ARALAPPAN, PLOT NO.A.24, SANTHI NAGAR ANNEXE, RAJAGIRI P.O., SOUTH KALAMASSERY, KOCHI-683 104. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH. K.RAJU. RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------------------- REGHURAMAN, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, S/O.VENUGOPALAN .R., SECRETARY, KALAMASSERY MUNICIPALITY, KALAMASSERY, RESIDING AT JYOTHIS, EROOR-683 104. BY ADV. SRI.M.K.ABOOBACKER. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------ Cont. case (C).No.1346 OF 2010 ------------------------------ Dated this the 10th day of December, 2010 JUDGMENT Heard. An affidavit is filed by the respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in the affidavit, the action taken has been disclosed. He further says that there is enormous delay in taking up necessary steps. It is pointed out by the counsel for the respondent that the judgment dated 2.12.2009 did not provide any particular time frame and the delay was attributable to the involvement of the respondent in the preparation of voters list. This contempt of court case is hence closed without prejudice to the petitioner seeking appropriate relief in the event of any further delay in the matter. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.14/12.