IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.675 of 2009 VIDHAN KUMAR, Son of Mohit Rai, resident of Bajitpur Saidat, P.S. Bidupur, District- Vaishali. . . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through Principal Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Patna. 2. The Director General of Police, Bihar. Patna. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Vaishali at Hazipur. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sadar Vaishali, District- Vaishali at Hazipur. 5. Officer-in-charge, Bidupur, District- Vaishali at Hazipur. 6. Dinesh Kumar Mishra, Sub Inspector of Police cum Investigating officer, Bidupur Police Station, District- Vaishali at Hazipur. . . . . . Respondents. ----------- 3/ 01.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner prays for constituting an enquiry into the accusation against him in respect of his arrest on 31.03.2009 in Bidupur P.S. case no. 79 of 2009, which was registered on 02.04.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that information regarding Bidupur P.S. case no. 79 of 2009uder Section 392 of the I.P.C. was given on 02.04.2009. The petitioner asserts that he was arrested on 31.03.2009. In support of his submission, learned counsel has drawn attention to a reporting in daily newspaper ‘Hindustan’ dated 01.04.2009. Learned counsel submits that subsequently, the police in order to falsely implicate this petitioner and save some other persons, has prepared an arrest memo showing his arrest on 02.04.2009 when in fact he was arrested on 31.03.2009. He further submits that it is conspicuous as to why the F.I.R. was not instituted on 1st April, 2009 itself, when the matter in respect of offence appeared in the newspaper on 1st April, 2009. - 2 - A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of State. Learned counsel for State submits that the petitioner was arrested on 02.04.2009. He further submits that the petitioner has signed the arrest memo mentioning the date of arrest as 02.04.2009. Heard counsel for the parties, the grievance of the petitioner is that he has been arrested on 31.03.2009 without institution of any case till 02.04.2009. He has also referred to the Newspaper report. In my view, if petitioner has any grievance in respect of fairness of the police officer, it will be open for him to represent to the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Muzaffarpur, Range, who would look into the matter. With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)