CR No.1299 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CR No.1299 of 2009 Date of decision March 18, 2009 Som Parkash and another ....... Petitioners Versus Punjab Financial Corporation ........Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- None. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? Yes 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? Yes 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? Yes K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called. The case was being represented by the petitioner himself at the previous hearing. 2. The matter in revision is against the action taken by the District Judge for bringing to sale the property by virtue of the powers conferred on him under Section 28 of the State Finance Corporation Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). The objection is made to such process in revision by the judgment debtor contending that the property is a residential house and there is a statutory bar against attachment of the residential property. The contention is not tenable in law in view of the fact that the proceedings under Section 28 of the 'Act' involves no attachment but it is a property mortgaged in favour of the Financial institution. The proceedings have not actually taken place under the Civil Procedure Code by order 21 Rule 11 but it is a process of sale under Section 28 of the State Finance Corporation Act, 1951. The CR No.1299 of 2009 2 objection of the judgment debtor is not tenable. 3. There is no error or illegality in the orders passed by the Court below. The Civil revision is dismissed at the stage of admission itself. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 18, 2009 archana