HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU W.P.NO. 21015 OF 2001 DATED : 25-11-2010 Between: M.Vasantha Rao …Petitioner And Government of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Director of Collegiate Education & 3 others …Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU W.P.NO. 21015 OF 2001 O R D E R: The petitioner is a part time Lecturer in History in T.J.P.S. college, Guntur, which is the 3rd respondent herein. There was selection to the regular aided post of Lecturer in History in the same college. The petitioner, as well as the newly impleaded 4th respondent along with others appeared for interview before the interviewing committee. According to the petitioner, the 3rd respondent was not following selection procedure laid down in G.O.Ms.No.12 Education (CE.I-2) Department dated 10-1-1992 during the said selection. Apprehending injustice to him, the petitioner approached this court with this writ petition seeking Mandamus in that regard. 2. Originally, the writ petition was filed against the respondents 1 to 3. Subsequently, the 4th respondent got himself impleaded in this writ petition on the ground that he was selected and appointed as aided Lecturer in History in the 3rd respondent college in pursuance of the impugned selections. According to the 4th respondent, G.O.Ms.No. 214 General Administration (Ser.A) Department dated 08-05-2001 is the relevant G.O. which prescribed the procedure for selection and appointment. 3. At this stage and in view of the subsequent event of the 4th respondent being selected and appointed, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner has to challenge the entire selection process as well as the appointment of the 4th respondent by way of comprehensive proceeding. 4. It is contended by the petitioner’s counsel that G.O.Ms.No. 214 is not the appropriate Government Order applicable for selection to aided post in private colleges, but is applicable to selection of posts in Government colleges. Having regard to the subsequent event of appointing the 4th respondent after selection, I propose to dispose of the writ petition giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the selection procedure and appointment of 4th respondent as well as necessary G.Os, if any, coming in his way by way of a comprehensive writ petition. 5. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _______________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J Dt.25-11-2010 Mjl/*