IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4266 of 2011 JAI NANDAN SINGH, son of Late Ram Charitra Singh, Permanent resident of village – Sajanpura, P.S. – Bahera, District – Darbhanga, presently residing at House No. 8, Bikramshila Cooperative Society, Hanuman Nagar, P.O. & P.S. – Patrakar Nagar, Kankarbagh, Patna, District – Patna. ----------- Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CBI, ACB, PATNA ------- Opposite Party ----------- 02. 09.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Special Public Prosecutor for the Central Bureau of Investigation. Earlier vide order dated 21.09.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10739 of 2010 under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the prayer for anticipatory bail made on behalf of the petitioner was refused by this court mainly on two counts each of them alone was independently sufficient for refusal of the prayer as observed in the last paragraph therein (1) the huge unaccounted amount worth Rs. 55 lacs said to have earned in different ways by the petitioner contrary to known sources of his income (2) besides attempts said to be taken by him, prohibiting the witnesses from appearance in the court during trial.” Undisputedly, the petitioner preferred Special Leave Application to Appeal No. 9114 of 2010 before the Apex Court which has been dismissed vide order dated 22.11.2010. The petitioner has renewed the prayer only on the ground that as regard to DA case his assertions has been affirmed by the Income Tax Appellate Authority on 05.07.2010 as well as by Appellate Tribunal of Income Tax on 16.12.2010. No doubt order of Tribunal has come not only after order of this court as well as order of the Apex Court, but this alone is not sufficient to enable the petitioner to file second application. 2 Considering the facts and circumstances, I find no reason to give any other thought to the decision already arrived. Accordingly, finding no merit in this application, it is hereby dismissed. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)