IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2008 / 3RD ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 14740 of 2008(D) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- P.V.MATHEW, PULIKKAYIL HOUSE, CHOTTUPARA P.O., THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.PRASAD CHANDRAN RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.V.MANOJKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.14740/2008 D APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DTD. 7/08/2007. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 14740 OF 2008 - D = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 24th June 2008 J U D G M E N T The prayer in this writ petition is for a direction to pass orders on Ext. P1 application submitted by the petitioner for revision of his own timings. 2. Learned Govt. Pleader, on instruction, submits that Ext. P1 was considered and rejected by proceedings dated 27.9.2007. It is also submitted that the proceedings have been communicated to the petitioner which submission is disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the order that has been passed on Ext. P1, the prayer sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted. However, if orders on Ext. P1 have not been communicated to the petitioner, I direct that it will be open to the petitioner to approach the respondent in which case the petitioner will be given a copy of the proceedings. It is clarified that it will also be open to the petitioner to pursue his remedies as is permissible in law. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-