IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2008 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1930 Con. Case(C).No. 1074 of 2008(S) --------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.9821/2008 Dated 25/03/2008 ...................................................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C): -------------------------------------------- SUNDARESH, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O.RUGMINI AMMA, ASARIKKAL HOUSE, KUNNATHRA, KOILANDI, KOZHIKKODE DIST. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------- P.VEERAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOILANDI. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. A.J. VARGHESE THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== C.O.C. NO. 1074 OF 2008 (S) =================== Dated this the 28th day of October, 2008 J U D G M E N T The writ petition was disposed of by judgment dated 25th of March, 2008 directing the AEO to consider and pass orders on Exts. P1 and P1(a) representations made by the petitioner for revision of rent. Orders were directed to be passed within 6 weeks of production of a copy of that judgment. 2. Answering the allegation of non compliance of the aforesaid direction, the 1st respondent has filed a counter affidavit in which he has explained the steps that he has taken for complying with the judgment. As is seen from the affidavit, he has pursued the matter before the PWD authorities and he has also called for further details from the KSEB and also the petitioner. Though the time prescribed for complying with the judgment has expired, still having regard to the steps taken by the authorities as explained in the affidavit, I am not persuaded to think that there is any wilful disobedience of the judgment warranting proceedings against the respondents. Cont.Case 1074/08 :2 : 3. Be that as it may, it will be open to the petitioner to furnish the documents called for, in which case, the respondents shall complete the process as ordered, without any further delay. Contempt of court case is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp