IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 858 of 2008 Jeevan & another ….. Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ….. Respondents Mr. Rakesh Thapaliyal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Rakesh Thapaliyal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. 2. Learned Brief Holder for the State submits before this Court that it has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit that the police has completed the investigation and after completion of investigation the police has found that there is a prima-facie case against the petitioners, and as such the police has submitted the chargesheet against the petitioners, namely, Jeevan and Geeta, before the Circle Officer concerned. It was further submitted that in view of above the writ petition filed by petitioner seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them has, now, become infructuous. The police is likely to submit the chargesheet against the petitioners before the court concerned in the near future. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. However, interim order dated 31.10.2008 shall remain operative till the chargesheet is filed before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 22.04.2009 LSR