^SSSKS^,, ^.. C-78 ^vSf '-^l^llrt^, tp-nl^^Ko, fcirti^yx *ii*irti a»iTT^ 3TI^?T tra<P (yii^q«g) ^200 OT^^TcpTf^Hc^ ^snsTr^^T^mcp ?^TTWr ^?T 31T^$T YSinale Bench; Hon'h W.P. PETETCONER (Petition U/A Ishwai about Chhati (C.G.). Vs RESPONDENTS 1. St< be] Bh( 2. Th( De| Jai 3. Col Ch< 4. Thi We Present: Mr. H.S. Patel, Advocate for the p Mrs. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for 17.11.2008 The petitioner has impugne passed by respondent No.4 wherel vide order dated 14.2.1994 of Ann circular dated 4.6.2002 issued by Learned counsel for the p< squarely covered by the orders o1 in W.P. (s) No.2125/02 & 3846/0 <ni^ic'»<nvi^i^c")T^T^Lci ^Fjitci^ ^3Tf^T3n^9T Mr. Ju^tice bhirendra Mishra) s1 No.6393/2008 !6 of Constitution of India) Lal Patel, Son of Dev Prasad Patel, aged 38 ycars, Jalwahak, Adivasi Balak avas, Baloda, District Janjgir-Champa fe of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, >artment of Tribal Weifare, &.K.S. iwon, Raipur (CG). Commissioner, Tribal Welfare )artmen1\ Janjgir-Champa, District ijgir-Champa (CG). ector, (Tribal Welfare Branch), Janjgir- :mpa (CG) District Organizer, Department of Tribal Ifare, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) -titioner. "he State. jd the order of Annexure P-1 dated 3.8.2002 ^y regular pay scale granted to the petitioner ilsxure P-3 has been withdrawn on the basis of Ihe respondent No.4. ^titioner submits that the instant matter is 1 this Court dated 18.1.206 & 5.7.2007 passed respectively wherein it has been held that ^^^^ ;^^'; C-78 ^pcT '^i<4irt^, u>Ti1'<-t<i<o; Rrti^y< TPTOT^m^ 3TT^?T q?<P (licl^61<£?) W-1200 3TT^^TcpTf^TT<^ cTSn3TT^$T?CTTc}) .A g^TTT^R ^?T 3H^$T ^2_- once a right of particular pay with law, the same cannot be wi' hearing. Since in the instant cas^ to fix monthly pay scale after regJL withdrawn on the basis of opportunity of hearing to the petil The above fact is not dispu| In that view of the mdi (Annexure P-1) is hereby quashed) entitled for the pay-scale from impugned ordcr. No order as to Certified copy as per rule^ sca e has been granted to a person in accordance |hdrawn without affording any opportunity of the petitioner has already acquired the right reg|ularization of his services, the same cannot be sorrte administrative circular without affording tioner. t-ed by learned counsel for the State. |itter, the impugned order dated 3.8.2002 and it is directed that the petitioner is also t^e date the same has been withdrawn by the €pi^ic*>^n<i+11+10^"'^'fe^i ^Fji^i^ ^•3ri^T3T1^3T cdsts. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge