IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 19TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 30TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 5455 of 2010(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- K.A.ASHRAF,AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.K.B.ABDUL RAHIMAN,33/2854 A,SHARON,VAKKAT ROAD,CHAKKARAPPARAMBU,THAMMANAM.P.O, KOCHI-682 032. BY ADV. SRI.A.BALAGOPALAN SRI.A.RAJAGOPALAN SRI.IMTHIYAZ AHAMED SRI.K.SANEESH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ THE CORPORATION OF COCHIN,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION OF COCHIN, PARK AVENUE,KOCH-682011. SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, SC FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 5455 OF 2010 (F) ===================== Dated this the 19th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is a resident of Vakkat Road. It is stated that at the point where the said road joins the main road, there was traffic congestion and that to avoid the situation, petitioner surrendered a portion of his property for the construction of a bellmouth. It is stated that although the purpose was for ensuring smooth traffic, the area surrendered by the petitioner has been made use of by some miscreants in the area, who have erected a statue, as a result of which, the whole purpose of surrender is defeated. 2. Petitioner submits that aggrieved by this unauthorised conduct, he and others have filed representations before the respondent for taking necessary action including for the removal of the statue. It is complained that there has not been any action on the representation so filed. It is with this grievance the writ petition is filed. 3. If the facts are as stated by the petitioner, this certainly is a matter which requires the attention of the WPC 5455/10 :2 : respondent. In view of the complaint of the petitioner that there has not been any action on this representation, it is directed that on the production of a copy of this judgment, the respondent shall take necessary action on Ext.P1 remedying the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp