IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.396 of 2010 MANZORR ALAM S/o Late Hakim Ansari Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04 09-03-2010 Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar No.1, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.7, learned counsel for the informant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Bettiah Mufassil P.S. Case No.06 of 2009 for offences under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears from the order dated 18.1.2010 that learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted that the informant is ready to support that the case has been lodged on account of some confusion. Accordingly, learned counsel for the informant has appeared before this Court and he supports the stand of the petitioner. He reiterates that due to confusion this case was lodged. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that one of the accused, though she was mother-in-law, has already been granted bail by this Court vide Cr.Misc.No.31062 of 2009 on 10.9.2009. - 2 - Without going into the merits of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Bettiah Mufassil P.S. Case No.06 of 2009 with a condition that on each and every date fixed by the court below petitioner shall remain present, failing which his bail bond shall stand automatically cancelled, provided that in special exigency the petitioner can file a petition before the court below for prior permission for his non- appearance on a particular date and the court below may examine such prayer on its own merit. With the above observation and direction, the bail petition is allowed. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J)