IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1303 of 2010 SHAMBHU YADAV SON OF PARMESHWAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 15.3.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 449, 302, 201, 379/34, 411 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It has been alleged by the informant that the petitioner along with Pappu Yadav entered into her room and thereafter there is an allegation that the petitioner fired. The further allegation is that co-accused Pappu Yadav fired at the deceased, due to which he died. Two other accused persons entered into the room of the informant and also fired, due to which one child of the informant lost his life. In view of the nature of the allegations, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. It is submitted that the informant has been examined during the trial and she has not supported the case of the prosecution and, therefore, I find that the trial is at the fag end. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial so as to conclude it expeditiously. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )