G> gmglo gem?! BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w“P.ls;No. 33W /2oo9 / Smt. Sangeeta Gupta, wife of Shri BB. Gupta, aged about 4O years, presently working as Lecturer in Chemistry, Government Higher Secondary School, Jevrasirsa, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS ,9 1) State ’of Chhattisgarh — through the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, ,“ Raipur (CIGJ PETITIONER 2) (The Collector, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) K . ‘ 3) The District Education Officer, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ’37 RESPONDENTS / ‘ a WWWW mmwwwa 3w/FL2W7 mm (Wu) mmm ‘ Wam wmn aaaiwwm SB: HON’BLE JUSTHCE MR §RiTiNKER §§W13xKEF§ 1$-07-2EM32 ‘Shri PR. Patanker. counHsei fsr the petiticmer. Shri Sumesh Bajaj; Gov. Advocate forthe State. Chalienge in the instan‘ writ peiition is to the order dated sed by the respondent No. 35 by which tha petitioner who is wurking on the post of Lectwer (Chemisrryé has been transfe red from Govt. Higher Secondary School. Jewrasirsa to Govt. Hi her Secondary Sohooi; Arjunda. 06.07.2009 {Annexure P-3)‘ p Counsel for the’peiition r submits that neither the peri‘zioner is surplus nor she can be tr nsferred §n her present praoe of posting because options we invited by respondent No. 3 from the petitioner and she gave on for three other pieces whereas she has been transferred enti eiy to a different piece. He further submits that husband of petitioner is aiso a Lecturer (Chemistry) and by the o er impugned both have been transferred to different place and thus the famity itte ot' the petitioner wouid be disturbed. / Learned coGnsei for the State submits that iet the petitioner make a representation befo the Competent Authority and the same would be decided in soc rdence with iew. s r oi i i: e r £9 EH/ £2007 mm (W13) WWW wmm mmm WW WW éqaifrmm . Accordingly; the writ p t0 ’{he petitioner to fiie repres within 10 days from ihe daté same woti‘l’d be decided by further period’of three weeks accordance with law. Tiii ih given effect to and ihe petiti present piae‘e of pasting. etition is disposed of with a direction enteiien to the authorities concerned a of receipt of copy of this order. the the authorities concerned wiihin a from ihe date of its receipt striotiy in an the order impugned shaii not be oner shaii be aiiowed to work in her Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker J Judge