IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No. 841 of 1995 Date of Decision: July 13, 2011 Jujhar Singh. ….Petitioner Versus Pushpinder Singh and another. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: None. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) I have gone through the record. The allegation of the petitioner is that the respondents are willfully disobeying the orders of this Court as the undertaking given by them was only to mislead the Court and cheat the petitioner in Company Petition No. 144 of 1987. Respondents have given an undertaking that they shall replace the petitioner as the guarantor of the Company. In reply, respondents have specifically averred that they have not violated any order of this Court because the Company petition in which the order was passed was dismissed vide COCP No.841 of 1995 order dated 06.09.1990 and further the appeal was also dismissed by a Division Bench on 13.08.1992. It is further replied that as per the undertaking the guarantees by Group headed Surjeet Kaur had already furnished with the Bank. Respondents have also tendered unqualified apology. As such, no case of contempt of court is made out under Section 12 of the Courts Act. Present petition is dismissed. July 13, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2