1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 31. CA/10600/2008 in FAST/18853/2008 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.S.B.Wadmare, A.G.P., for the applicant. Mr. A.B.Gaikwad, Adv., for respondent nos. 1 to 4. ... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 9th July, 2009 ... P.C.:- 1. Heard both the Counsel extensively. Mr.Gaikwad, Counsel, has opposed to entertain the application contending that the delay is not of 91 days only but it is more than the period indicated. He did not expand the period of delay. 2. The fact remains, on calculation, the delay is indicated to be 91 days. The order under challenge in LAR No.393/1991 is dt.5th Dec., 2007. Copy application was made on 28th Feb., 2008. It was ready for delivery on 20th June, 2008 and, after collection of the copies, the matter was moved to the respective authorities and the appeal is presented on 24.9.2008. The 2 delay in the matter, is not deliberate. It is sufficiently explained. Application allowed. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/ca10600-08