-1- Civil Revision No.97 of 2011. IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Date of Decision: January 06, 2011. Civil Revision No.97 of 2011. Dalip Singh ... Petitioner VERSUS Shila Devi ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL. 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr.Jagat Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- MOHINDER PAL, J. The challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the trial Court on 4.12.2010 whereby the petitioner-plaintiff has been ordered to pay ad valorem Court fee on the sale consideration of Rs.10,07,000/- in respect of sale deed No.3269 dated 23.11.2007. -2- Civil Revision No.97 of 2011. In the suit filed by the petitioner-plaintiff against the respondent-defendant for a declaration to the effect that he (plaintiff) was owner in possession of the land in dispute and that the sale deed No.3269 dated 23.11.2007 allegedly made by the plaintiff in favour of defendant-respondent was wrong, illegal and had come in existence by fraud, misrepresentation and deceitful means, the defendant-respondent filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure making a prayer that the petitioner-plaintiff may be directed to make payment of ad valorem Court fee on the sale consideration of Rs.10,07,000/- in respect of the said sale deed. The said application of the respondent-defendant was allowed by the learned trial Judge and the petitioner-plaintiff was directed to pay ad valorem Court fee on the sale consideration of Rs.10,07,000/-. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner- plaintiff and perusing the impugned order, I do not see any ground which may warrant interference by this Court. Admittedly, Court fee is to be determined as per the market value of the land, which, in this case is Rs.10,07,000/-. The learned trial Judge has rightly directed the petitioner-plaintiff to pay ad valorem Court fee on this amount. Hence, this revision petition is dismissed being without any merit. ( MOHINDER PAL ) January 06, 2011. JUDGE ak -3- Civil Revision No.97 of 2011.