IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 378 of 2010 Decided on: 6.4.2011 Roop Ram …Petitioner Versus Mr. Vaneet Kumar …Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : In sequel to order dated 5.1.2011, respondent Mr. Vaneet Kumar is present in person. He submits that the judgment in question rendered in CWP(T) No. 7727 of 2008, decided on 16.6.2010 shall be implemented in letter and spirit subject to the outcome of Letters Patent Appeal, which has been preferred against the above said judgment, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment. 2. In view of the fair stand adopted by Mr. Vaneet Kumar, the present petition is disposed of. Notice is discharged. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge April 6, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?