1 WP .1079.07 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1079 OF 2007 Dattatraya s/o Bhagwanrao Satpute... Petitioner Versus The Chairman/Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar & Others. ... Respondents. ------ Shri. N.V. Gaware, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri. S.P. Shah, Advocate i/by Shri. P.M. Senior Counsel, for respondent No.1. Shri. N.B. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent 1-A. Shri. S.S. Jadhavar, Advocate for respondent No. 4. ------- CORAM:NARESH H PATIL & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE: 22nd JUNE 2009 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was already promoted. The petitioner seeks deemed date and consequential benefits. 2 WP .1079.07 3) The petitioner may make appropriate representation in this regard. No interference is called for in exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4) The writ petition is disposed of. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.1079.07