V gawk @ . IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG; was No... V3 F? 3 .../2009 /' Udho Ram Sahu Aged about 44 years, 5/0 Shri Chain Ram Sahu, Presently posted as Assistant Garde 111, Kanya Shiksha $§W§§§> gwwgw M ‘ PETITIONER: Parisar, District Rajn'andgaon, CG. i‘ ; VERSUS / , RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh , Through the Joint Secretary/ Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Collector' District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal welfare, Rajnandgaon , (Chhattisgarh) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: I ' As stated above in the cause title. @ mmwswlxw/ ' Hizooq mam (W) mmm mw§wm énimm li~#y SB: Hon. Mr. Justice P *itinker Diwaker 12.08.2009: Shri Jitendra Paii, counsel for the petitioner. h k Shri Yashwant Singh T ur, Deputy. Advocate General for the respondents/State. is to the order dated 30.6.2009 passed by respondent No.1 by hich the petitioner who is working as Assistant Grade ll has be n transferred from Kanya Shiksha Parisar, Chowki, District Rajn dgaon to the office of Assistant Commissioner, District Bastar, administrative ground. Contention of the coun el for the petitioner is that the petitioner is an assistant grade i and the seniority of the assistant grade ll is maintained district se. He further submits that if the petitioner is forced to go and join in the transferred place, his seniority would be adversely affe ted. Counsel for the respon ems/State submits that let the petitioner make a suitable presentation to the authorities concerned which would be deci ed in accordance with law. To this proposition of the State counsel counsel for the petitioner showed his agreement. However, he pr ys for an interim protection till the representation of the petition r is decided by the authorities concerned. Accordingly, the petition i disposed of with a direCtion that if l ' " the petitioner makes a represen ation to the authorities concernedl Challenge in this petitlo n i e within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of copy of this ed shall decide the same within a )m the date of its receipt. Till then the 1‘ abeyance so far as it relates to the Sci/- Pritinker 73iwaker order, the authorities concerr{ further period‘of three weeks frJ order impugned shall be kept i petitioner. Judge