IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2031 of 2010 1. RAMDAHIN YADAV SON OF RAGHUNATH YADAV 2. JITAL YADAV SON OF RAGHUNATH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 2.2.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 25(1-b)A, 26 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that for recovery of Sten-gun and empty cartridge and a country made pistol respectively, the petitioners have remained in custody since 26.3.2009 and there is no other case of similar nature against them, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Kasma P.S.case No.11 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse of bail and (iii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be - 2 - present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. The learned Magistrate will verify the fact that the petitioners are not accused in any other case of similar nature before releasing the petitioners on bail. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )