IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 18273 of 2009. [O&M] Date of Decision: 4th October, 2010. Smt. Vijay Luxmi Petitioner through Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate Versus C.B.S.E. & Ors. Respondents through Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate, for respondents NO. 2 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 24.11.2009 whereby she has been ordered to be superannuated on attaining the age of 58 years w.e.f. 30.11.2009. The petitioner also seeks a Mandamus to direct the respondents to allow her to continue in service up to the age of 60 years. The afore-stated relief has been sought on the basis of certain instructions issued by the Central Board of School Education. A Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 406 of 2010 [Satinder Kaur v Union of India & Ors. decided on 22.9.2010 has held as follows:- “The bye-laws of the CBSE are mere guidelines which are required to be followed by schools affiliated to the CBSE. The said bye-laws do not govern the service conditions of teachers of the affiliated schools. Merely because the respondent school is affiliated to the CBSE for the purpose of examinations, such affiliation will not make the respondent No. 4 amenable to the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. We, therefore, decline to entertain this LPA and to go into the merits of the issues raised by the learned counsel for the appellant. Instead, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the LPA by leaving it open for the appellant – writ petitioner to seek other remedies that may be available to her in law”. Otherwise also, the respondent School being an unaided privately managed school, the petitioner can not seek a Specific Performance of her service conditions in the light of the view taken by this Court in Mrs. K.Naqvi v State of Punjab & Ors., 2004[2] SCT, 815. Dismissed. October 04, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE