IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2010 / 29TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 20616 of 2010(B) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- K.J.JOSEPH, VALIYAVEETTIL KALAPPURAYIL, PAKALOMATTOM P.O., KURAVILANGAD, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT- 686 642. BY ADVS. SRI.V.G.ARUN, SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, MVIP SUPERINTENDING OFFICE, MUVATTUPUZHA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 661. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.V.I.P PROJECT, KOOTHATTUKULAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT- 686 662. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/07/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 20616 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 20th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T Near to the petitioner's property, a bridge has been constructed. The petitioner submits that, the people of the locality are seriously prejudiced because of the unscientific way in which the bridge has been constructed. According to the petitioner, in order to make the bridge useful for the people of the locality it is imperative that the bridge be reconstructed. Taking this contention, the petitioner has filed Ext.P6 representation before the 1st respondent. Petitioner now confines his relief for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 as expeditiously as possible. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 as expeditiously as W.P.(C)No. 20616 of 2010 -2- possible, at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE shg/