m m 3mg com? 0r mxcxwxm A'r Jampm whrr PETITI’QN‘ No; §}O:$o“r '2060 M/s Rathi 5: Campany. burg, , a registergd partnership firm through its partner Nathoolal Kathi son of late shri Mitha'lal Rathi aged 57 years resideng of Ganjparamurg. o‘ o o Petitiener VersuB k 1. State ¢£ Madhya Pradesh. ‘ through its Primipal Secretary, Mineral Rescurees Department Vallabh Bhawan, Bhgpal; k2. m Colléctor. Burg. \/ 3. Mining offiaar. Burg. 4 Government of India ' V - Ministry cf Mines ' Department ef Mines Shashtri Bhawaa. New Delhi. . o a a Respcndents . wan- pE'rITIox UNDER ARTIcLE 226 & 227 er THE wusnmoudox- man . T IGH/COURT OF CHHATTI$§ARH AT BILASPUE mT PETITION No. 5706 OF 2000 . ‘ Mls. Rathi 8: Company, Durg. Petitioner Versus 0: ‘Resgondems State of Chhathsgarh & Others Writ Petmon under Article 226 & 227 of the Ccnstttutton of Jndla) (SB Hon ble Mr Satnsh K Agnlhotn J) TNone for the petitioner Sim A;ay Dwwedi‘ Dy Govt Advocatefor the Stew , Shn Rahul Tamaskar Advocate for the Intewener (Passed on this ORDgg 07 day igRAL} of Juw; 201 . 1) The matter is caHed for hearing twice. None appears nor is a epresentation, mane 9n pehaif 0f the petitioner. The petitoner ay ny r i m ‘enot be interested in pursuingthe matter. in View of the above, the matter is; dismissed for viant of orqseMion. Registry is directedrto. eend a copy of this order to the petitioner, forthwith. , J § scu- Satieh K Agn'hm“ Judge H wM ( ‘ _