Letters Patent Appeal No.531 OF 2001 ----------- Against the order dated 12.4.2001 passed by Hon’ble Mr Justice S.K.Katriar in IA no.1568/2001 arising out of F.A. no. 608/2000. ---------- RAM PRAVESH SINGH-------------------------------------------------(Appellant) Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR----------------------------------------------(Respondents) For the appellant: Mr Yogendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State: Mr Shashi Bhushan Kumar SC 16 P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BARIN GHOSH THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE J.N.SINGH The Hon’ble Mr Justice Barin Ghosh & The Hon’ble Mr Justice J.N.Singh, JJ The appellant filed Title Suit no. 130 of 1994/69 of 1996 against the State of Bihar and another. By a judgment and order dated 27th July,2000 the suit was dismissed on contest with cost. Being aggrieved thereby the appellant filed an appeal. In the appeal he filed an Interlocutory application wherein it was stated that he is an indigent person and was declared so by the court below and accordingly had no obligation to pay court fee. In the application he had also stated that the appellant had not ceased to be an indigent person. In the application prayer was made for waiving the obligation of the appellant for payment of required court fee. This application has been dismissed by the order under appeal and hence the present Letters Patent Appeal. - 2 - The said application was not contested. It does not appear from the order under appeal that the Government pleader or the respondents in the application disputed the statements as were made in the said application. There is no finding that the court below did not declare appellant as indigent person. In the circumstances, in terms of Rule 1 of Order 44 of the Code of Civil Procedure there was no necessity of further enquiry as to whether applicant is an indigent person or not. The application in the circumstances ought to have had been allowed. In the circumstances, we allow the appeal, set aside order dated 12.4.2001 passed in F.A.no.608 of 2000, restore the appeal filed by the appellant and allow the interlocutory application of the appellant waiving his obligation to file court fee. Let the appeal be heard. (Barin Ghosh, J) ( J.N.Singh, J ) Patna High Court The 9th July,2008 Shahid /NAFR