(“4Q I WGLE 3mg 1N THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) ‘ WRIT PETITION IwNo MVao OF 2010 W ) Miss'Minakshi Singh D/o Shri J. P. Singh, aged about 23 'years, R/o Near State Bei’hk of India, Chirmiri, Bartunga CQlony', S.E.C.L. Chirmiri, District Koriya (C.G.). At present Ro Sarkanda, Bilaspur (C.G.). PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS / The Director General of Police, Police Headquarter, Raipur (C.G.). r 2. The Superintendent of Police, Koriya, District Koriya (C.G.). 3./ The Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). /V 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Chirrniri, District Koriya (C.G.). 5. Station House Officer, Police Station City Kotwali, Bilaspur (C.G.). T! J P Singh S/o D P Singh aged about 50 years , Bilaspur, District 7;. 'Manish Singh S/o Shri J. P. Singh, aged about 27 years. Both R/o Near State ank of India, tChirmiri, Bartunga Colony,. S.E.C.L. Chirmiri, District Koriya (CTG.). /i WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / W B HIGH COURT OF CH}IATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETITIQN (CL) N0. 1980 of2010 {iss Minakshi Singh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : T116 Director General ofPolice & Others. Present: Shn Shaliendra Dubev Advocate for the petitioner. Qhn 1 to 3 M P S Bhaua D‘v G A. m1 the State/respondent No. Shri Vhay Pandey, Advocate for the reapondent No 6 and 7 ORDER GRAL ‘ (Passed on 07 dayof October 2010) By this petItlorL ihe penuoner seeks a dlrectlon to the respondent ‘Jo 1 Lo 5 I e the pohce authormes to ensure plotectlon to the hie and liberty ofthe petmoner, against the respondent N0. 6 and 7. On 04.05.2010, due protectionwas granted to the petitioner by this b) Court. L)A Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No 6 and ’7 ie the parents of the petltloner submlts that smce thelr daughter had‘ decided to hve mdependently 1n the house of one Raj Mrshra as paymg guest, the parents have no objection and they have nothin to say in this matter. In View of the above, since the respondent No. 6 and 7 have nothing to sav and there is no apprehension to the hie and liberty ofthe petitionei nothlng survwes for adjudication 1n the matter 5. Accordingly, the Writ petition is disposed o£ w” ./ 4/ Sd‘], m 0 g