1 Cri.W.P.No.2240/09 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.40 OF 2010 Deepak V. Mehta ...Applicant(Org. Accd.No.3). v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.41 OF 2010 Ashok J. Joshi ...Applicant v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.Praveen L. Singh, adv. for the Applicant. Ms.S.V.Gajare, APP for the R.No.1. Mr. P.V.Nelson Rajan i/by India Legal Services, advs. for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : AUGUST 17, 2010 P.C. 1 Applicant and the respondent no.2 have filed ‘Consent Terms’ marked ‘X’ for Identification. Both the revision applications arise out of the conviction in C.C.No.1278/SS/2005 filed by the respondent no.2 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. In view of the settlement, parties are allowed to compound the case. The order of conviction and sentence is set aside. The accused are acquitted. 2 Cri.W.P.No.2240/09 2 Criminal Application Nos.54 and 55 of 2010 do not survive and stand disposed off accordingly. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)