1 Appln 4094-10 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4094 OF 2010 Sujit Narati Indrekar ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Ms Shilpa Kapil i/b. Mr.Chidanand Kapil, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.R.V.Newton, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 16TH NOVEMBER, 2010 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. This is an application for bail by a person, who participated in a dacoity by robbing complainant cash of Rs.50,000/-. The applicant was caught along with other miscreants after a chase. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was not caught on the spot and time of arrest 2 Appln 4094-10 is shown as 19:45 hours i. e. 7:00 hours after the incident. Time of performance of arrest panchnama need not necessarily coincide with the actual time when the applicant was apprehended after chase. Therefore, this discrepancy does not help applicant. Given the nature of allegations leveled against the applicant and also the fact that applicant is involved in another offence in which he claims to have been bailed out, Criminal Application is rejected. 3. The learned Counsel for the applicant now seeks leave to withdraw Criminal Application. Leave refused. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)