1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION No. 614/2011. Anandrao Bhojraj Gawrane -VERSUS- Adiwasi Vividh Karyakari Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit and others. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : 13.06.2011. Heard Shri I.N. Chaudhari, learned Counsel for petitioner, Shri M.R. Parkhi, learned Counsel for respondent no.3 and Shri J.B.Jaiswal, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos.4 and 5. Challenge is to appointment of respondent no.3 as Secretary, by respondent no.1 Cooperative Society. During arguments, learned Counsel for petitioner has pointed out that petitioner has made representation to respondent nos. 4 and 5 on 15.11.2010 and till date no cognizance thereof has 2 been taken. According to him, therefore, the petition is required to be filed. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondents, point out that such a writ against society is not maintainable. We find that the grievance of the petitioner can be partly redressed by directing respondent nos. 4 and 5 to look into his representation and to take appropriate decision upon it, in accordance with law and as early as possible and in any case within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order to it. With this directions and without recording any finding on merits of the matter, Writ Petition is disposed of. Consequently, pending Civil Applications (W) Nos. 1400 and 1401 are also disposed of. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Rgd