IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. No. 7386 of 2011. Decided on: 08.09.2011. Rajinder Kumar Sharma ….. Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and another …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner. : Mr. Dhruv Shaunak, Adv. For the respondents. : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): Petitioner claims the benefit of ad hoc/tenure service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in Paras Ram Vs. State of H.P. and another Latest HLJ 2009 (HP) 887. As prayed for, it is open for the petitioner to bring this fact to the notice of the respondents, who shall examine the same. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, alongwith representation and a copy of the writ petition as well as the copy of the judgment referred to above, by the petitioner. Pending application(s), if any also stands disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 08, 2011. (bhupender/K. Attri)