THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 8604 of 2007 Date: 23.04.2007 Between: K. Habeeb Basha and another. .... PETITIONERS AND The Superintending Engineer, APSEB, Rep. by its Secretary, APSPDCL, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad and others. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 8604 of 2007 Order: The petitioners state that they worked as Contract Labour in the respondents-Organization for about four years and left the Organization in the year 2004. Thereafter, pursuant to the notification issued by the respondents-Organization calling for the applications for the post of contract Junior Lineman, they applied for the same. Since they have not received any call letters till 21.04.2007, they approached the respondents-Organization and came to know that the 2nd respondent, namely the Superintending Engineer, APSPDCL (Operation Circle), Tirupathi, issued a memo, dated 02.12.2006, stating that the candidates, who are on rolls between 06.06.2006 and 20.10.2006, will only be considered for the post of Junior Lineman. Questioning the said memo, issued by the 2nd respondent, the petitioners filed the present writ petition. When the matter is taken up for admission, it is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-Organization that there is a mistake crept in the impugned memo, and in fact they will consider the cases of candidates, who are on rolls up to 20.10.2006. He further submitted that in the present case, admittedly, since the petitioners discontinued their services in the year 2004 itself and they are not on rolls as on 20.10.2006, they cannot have any grievance about the impugned memo issued by the 2nd respondent. He, however, submitted that the cases of the petitioners would be considered as per Clause 6 (A) of the revised notification, dated 14.11.2006. Learned counsel for the petitioners expressed no objection for the same. In that view of the matter, instead of keeping the writ petition pending, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: The respondents-Organization are directed to consider the cases of the petitioners for the post of Junior Lineman in the light of Clause 6 (A) of the revised notification, dated 14.11.2006, if they are otherwise qualified. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 23.04.2007 Note: Issue CC on priority basis (B/O) Nsr/Ksr