IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 12TH MARCH 2010 / 21ST PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 8114 of 2010(L) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ARUNKUMAR, VARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU CHULLIYOOR, MARAYAMUTTOM PO, NEYYATTINKARA. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.ANIL KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. NEYYATTINKARA MUNICIPALITY NEYYATTINKARA ,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, NEYYATTINKARA MUNICIPALITY NEYYATTINKARA . THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 8114 of 2010 L ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 12th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, in the Akshaya Shopping Complex owned by the 1st respondent Municipality, 10% of the shop rooms are to be allotted to the applicants among SC/ST communities. The petitioner submits, referring to Ext.P2 list of allottees, that the Municipality has not complied with the aforesaid requirement specified by the Government in Ext.P1 order. According to the petitioner, he has, by Ext.P3, applied for allotment of a room, which has to be considered by the Municipality in the light of Ext.P1. Having regard to the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent Municipality to consider Ext.P3 application made by the petitioner in the light of Ext.P1 Government Order referred to above. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks