IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 615 of 2008. Decided on: 19.07.2010. __________________________________________________________ Om Prakash … Petitioner. Versus H.P. State Electricity Board. … Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondent. : Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Petitioner is seeking regularization. Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioner has not yet completed ten years. If that is so, the respondent is directed to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization in accordance with law immediately after completion of ten years. 2. With the above observations/directions, the petition is disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. July 19, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?