1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.288 OF 2010 (Mrs. Ratnamala M. Gharade vs. State and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri S.M. Puranik, Advocate for petitioner. Shri A. Parihar, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 4. Shri A.S. Bendarkar, Advocate for respondent no.3. -------- CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE AND P.B.VARALE, JJ. DATED : JULY 8, 2010 Heard learned Counsel for the parties. We have perused the prayers in the writ petition so also the reply-affidavit filed by respondent no.2. From perusal of the prayers in the writ petition, it is clear that the petitioners have strong objection for construction of a proposed new bridge. Respondent no.2 in his affidavit and more particularly, in paragraph (3) thereof, has stated that there is no proposal for construction of new bridge 2 on the said nalla and, therefore, there is no question for changing alignment of the so called new bridge so as to prevent the house of the petitioner from being submerged. In view of the statement made on affidavit, in our opinion, the prayers in the writ petition cannot and need not be considered. Hence, the petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE khj