1 (4) WP 5451/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Amk WRIT PETITION NO. 5451 OF 2010 Deepti Bhushan Kedar .. Petitioner Vs. Bhushan Dattatrayay Kedar & Anr. .. Respondents Ms. Deepa Matwankar for the Petitioner Mr. S. D. Rayrikar AGP for Respondent No.2. Mr. H. E. Palwe for Respondent No.1. CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. Date : 19th October, 2010 P.C. 1. The Petitioner’s Advocate states that the original Divorce Petition has been disposed of. The order challenged in this Writ Petition is the interim order of maintenance in the Divorce Petition. Upon the disposal of the Divorce Petition the interim order comes to an end. Application for enhancement, therefore, does not survive. 2. However the interim amount of maintenance which is directed to be paid has to be paid pending the Petition. If that is not paid, application in execution would not survive. Similarly another application by the wife for maintenance alone is also maintainable. The Advocate states that such an application is filed. That application would be considered by the Competent Court on its own merit. The execution application, if any, for the amount which is due and payable pending the Petition would also be considered by the Competent Court on its 2 (4) WP 5451/10 own merit. This Petition has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. ( ROSHAN DALVI, J.)