IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 7TH OCTOBER 2008 / 15TH ASWINA 1930 RP.No. 1019 of 2008(Y) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.14693/2007 Dated 19/08/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 & 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LAND REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR LAND REVENUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR 4. KOLE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THRISSUR. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.K.BABU RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS 1 TO 3 & RESPONDENT NO.4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. T.R.KURIAN, PWD CONTRACTOR, THALIYATH HOUSE, SOUTH KOMBARA, IRINJALAKUDA, BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER RANJIT JOSE, AYMANAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. MRS. DAISY KURIAN, W/O. T.R.KURIAN, THALIYATH HOUSE, SOUTH KOMBARA, IRINJALAKUDA, BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER RANJIT JOSE, AYMANAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. MRS. SHERON KURIAN, D/O. T.R. KURIAN, THALIYATH HOUSE, SOUTH KOMBARA, ITINJALAKUDA. 4. THE KERALA KOLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION REP. BY THE CHAIRMAN, THRISSUR. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== R.P.No.1019 of 2008 IN W.P.(C) NO. 14693 OF 2007(Y) ==================== Dated this the 7th day of October, 2008 O R D E R Review sought for is of the order in IA 7739/08 directing that attachment in respect of one of the items of properties be lifted. It is now stated that the valuation shown by the writ petitioner in the IA was exaggerated. However, while passing the order, this Court had taken note of the fact that the respondents had not raised a plea that the valuation indicated by the petitioner was erroneous. That apart, even along with the review petition, the petitioner has not produced any material in support of its plea that the valuation indicated was erroneous. 2. I do not find any error apparent on the face of the order warranting review. Review petition is dismissed ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp