IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 602 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and MR.JUSTICE S.M.SONI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- SARPANCH, SINGORVA GRAM PANCHAYAT Versus SAGAR DRUGS & PHARMACEUTICALS LTD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: SUO MOTU for Petitioner MR BR SHAH for BN DOCTOR for Respondent No. 1 SERVED for Respondent No. 2 GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and MR.JUSTICE S.M.SONI Date of decision: 11/08/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr. B.R. Shah, learned counsel appearing for the unit has drawn our attention to our order dated 17.3.1997 and has pointed out that by mistake, the figure of the highest turnover of a year out of the last three years was stated as Rs.13 lakhs. He has stated that the actual figure should be Rs.14,89,49,019-35 for the year 1993-94 being the highest turnover out of the last three years. Rounding it of Rs.14,90,00,000/-, learned advocate states that 1% thereof shall be paid in the manner indicated in our order dated 17.3.97. 2. Learned counsel Mr. Shah submitted that now the unit has got authorisation from the GPCB under the provisions of Hazardous Waste (Management & Handling) Rules, 1989, and, therefore, the unit will now be able to dispose of its solid waste in accordance with the rules. Mr. Shah further submitted that the unit is not discharging any trade effluent and part of the effluent is evaporated in the lagoons and part is incinerated. GPCB has also submitted its inspection report in this behalf. In the circumstances, we dispose of this petition with a direction to the unit that the unit shall comply with all the directions given to it in the various orders passed by this Court earlier, as also the directions of GPCB. 3. This petition stands disposed of accordingly. 4. GPCB shall continue to monitor the unit and place before us the reports on 22nd September 1997. csm./ ----------