CWP No.16547 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16547 of 2008 Date of decision: 19.07.2011 Tonder Mal ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. R.D. Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.4 & 6 to 10. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) The only grievance in the present matter, as per learned counsel for the petitioner, is that respondent No.2 is not executing eviction order dated 31.3.2006 (Annexure P-1) duly confirmed by appellate authority vide order dated 31.12.2007 and thereby is permitting the private respondents to enjoy over encroached panchayat land. Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.4 and 6 to 10 states that there is a dispute regarding the identity of the land, therefore, respondent No.2 be directed to decide execution application in accordance with law after hearing private respondents. He has further stated that respondent No.2 should not dispossess the private respondents from the land which was not part of the proceedings under CWP No.16547 of 2008 2 Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, respondent No.2 is directed to take decision on application (Annexure P- 3) and representation (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law after hearing objections of respondents No.4 to 10, if any, preferably within six months. Both the parties shall appear before respondent No.2 on 30.7.2011 for further orders. Petition stands disposed of. (Alok Singh) Judge July 19, 2011 R.S.