IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4055 of 2011 GUDDU KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Counsel for the petitioner seeks and is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion during course of the day. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 30.08.2010 in connection with Agam Kuan P.S. Case No. 191 of 2010. Allegedly, the petitioner alongwith co-accused were caught by the informant and other persons while they were fleeing away after committing theft in the shop of the informant. It is specific assertion on behalf of the petitioner at paragraph-6 of his bail petition that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was working in the shop of informant at the relevant time and some hot exchange of words had taken place between the informant and the petitioner on account of non- payment of his wages as a result of which, the petitioner has been implicated in this case by the informant. Considering the above-said submissions and period of detention of the petitioner in judicial custody as well as this - 2 - aspect of the matter that the petitioner has a clean antecedent, let the petitioner, namely, Guddu Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Agam Kuan P.S. Case No. 191 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)