BEt^;^ ± ...k ^w IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) N0^lf 12009 (S.B.) PETITIONERS ^'.'.^ \y-^^^ ^^•^ ..•••• ...^ ^ RESPONDENTS 1. Brijendra Kumar Rathore, S/o Late Shri Harprasad Rathore, aged about 47 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Turekela, Distt. - Raigarh (C.G.) 2. Brijendra Kumar Singh Bais, S/o Shri Subhkaran Bais, aged about 45 years, R/o Vyayam Shikshak, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Turekela, Distt. — Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raigarh, Distt. - Raigarh (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, Raigarh, Distt. - Raigarh (C.G.) 1. ^ s- 'y-r 2- &) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. HIGH COXJRT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 7374 of2009 Petitioners Brijendra Kumar Rathore & another Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others (Writ Petition Under Article 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri Somkant Venaa, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri P. K. Bhadun, Panel Lawyer for fhe State/respondents. O R D E RfOralt (Passed on this 17th day ofDecember, 2009) Heard. Learned counsel appeanug for the petitioners subniits that pursuaiit to the letter dated 20,8.2009 (Annexure P/3), issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Raigarh, to the District Education Officer, Raigarh, simdlarly situated Teachers have been considered for absorption and they have been absorbed as per order dated 3.8.2009 (Annexure P/6). The petitioners are sioiilarly situated and they have opted for absorption ia the Education Departnient, !. Learned counsel appeaiing for the petitioners further subiaits that the petitioners m.ay be permitted to nxake a representation ia the Ught ofthe above subraissions to consider their cases and the concerned authority niay be directed to pass appropriate order in accordance with law. S. Learned counsel appeariiig for the respondents/State has no objection, k In view ofthe foregoiag, the petitiou stands disposed ofwith the above-stated Uberty, ifso advised. No order asto costs. Thakur. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge