^^ 5) IN THE HIGH COURr OF CHHATnSGARH : BILASPUR Petltiouers Writ Petition (S) No. 1292 of 2009 1. Aiaar Siagh^ S/o Shri Payrelal, aged about 32 years, Occupatioii - Shiksha Kanni Grade-IiI, Posted at Priniary School Kholwa, Janpad Panchayat Sahashpur Lohara, Distt. Kabmlham (C.G.) 2. Jai Nara^^an^ S/o Shri Ishwar Lal, aged about 24 yeai's, Occupation - Shiksha Karmi Grade-Ili, posted at Priiaary School Patpar, Janpad Pauchayat Sahashpur Lohai-a, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) 3, Puran Lal Sahu, S/o Shri Parasram, aged about 34 years, Occupation- Shiksha Kanm Grade-III, posted at PriniQry School B, Nagar, Jaupad Paiicha}rat Sahashpur Lofaara, Distt. Kabirdhata (C.G.) 4. Rotdt Kuinar Sahu, S/6 Shri Santosh Ram, aged about 31 years, Occupation - Shiksha Kanni Grade-III, posted at Pri3ii%!3r School Khainiha, Janpad Panchayat Sahashpur Lohara Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) 5. Imran Khan, S/o Shri I.D,Khan, aged about 24 years, Occupation SMksha Karaai Grade-III, Posted at Prmiary School Singhaupuri, Jaapad Panchayat Sahashpur Lohara, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) 6. Dwarikaram, S/o Shri Dhaniram, a^ed about 26 3^ears, Occzipation Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, posted at Pnniary School B. Nagar, Jaupad Panchayat Sahashpur Lohara, Distt. Kabirdham (C,G.) 7. Chandiakant Sahu, S/o Shri Ramadhai' Sahu, aged about 25 years, Occupation SMksha Karmi Grade-III, Posted at Primaiy School B. Nagar, Janpad Panchayat Sahashpui' Lohara, Distt. Kabixxlham (C,G.) 8. Uiua Bai, W/o Shri Shyani Lal, aged about 34 years, Occupatiou Shiksha Karmi Grade-111, posted at Priinary School Majdaon, Janpad Panchayat Sahashpur Lohara, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) 9. Rajendra Kuraar, S/o Shri Latinar, aged about 28 years, Occupation Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, Posted at Pnmary School Kejedah, Janpad Panchayat Sahashpur Lohai-a, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) 10. Jyoti Sahu, D/o Shri Iswar Sahu, aged about 25 years, Occupation Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, posted at Prfcmar}^ School Dumriya, Janpad Panchayat Sahashpur Lohara, Distt. Kabirdhaai (C.G.) Versus ^ 7. ^-^ Respondents 1. 2. 3. State of Chhatflsgarh, through it's Secretary, Departoient of Paachayat & Rural Development, D,K.S. Bhawan, Raipiir (C.G.). CoUector, Kabudham (C.G.) Jila Panchayat Kabirdhaisi through its Chief Executive Ofiicer, Distt, Kabirdham (C,G.) Jaapad Panchayat Sahashpur Lohara, through its Chief Executive Officer, Distt. Kabiidham (C.G.) WRIT FI'ITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OPTHE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AgmhotriJ.) Shri Vmay Pandey, Advocate for the petitioncrs. Shn Yashwant Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents No. 1 & 2/ State. 0_E_D,EE (P&ssed on this 5th day of March, 2009) 1. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for tlie parties, the matter is heard fmatly. 2. Learned counsel appearix^g for fhe respondent No.l/State faurly subinit that the issue uivolved in this case asto whefher the petitioners, who ai'e Shiksha Karmis, have been afforded aa opportunity of headng befbre termmation from their post, caine uito consideration before ttais Court ia Uie raatter of Ku« Punam aad others v. State of Clihattisgarti & others1. Learned counsel further subinits that siace no notice was given before teraiination, the authorities shall take appropriate steps m terms of the judgment and order passed ia Ku. Putiam (supra), befbre passiag any order. He subinits that show cause notice shall be issued to the petitioners grantmg them two weeks time to file rcply and after hawwg considercd 12008(2)CGLJ366 i^SS^i^^ 3. C5f. -^ the reply, fhe State auttionties shail pass appropriate order, in accordaace with law, The concemed authorities will tory to coraplete the whole exercise withia a period of three weeks. In view of the foregoiag, accordiag to learned counsel appeadng for the petitioners, nothing sunnves in this petition for adjudication. Having regard to the facts situation of the case and the judgment passed in the matter of Ku. Punam (supra), the impugned termination orders dated 17.2.2009 aad 26.2.2009 (Annexure P/ 1) are quashed. However, Uberty is rcserved to the respondents/ authorities to take appropriate steps ia accordaace witfi law, as above-stated by leanied Deputy Advocate General withia a period of three weeks. The petition is allowed to the above extent. No order asto costs. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge