fe a<li<(] W R-ll'ti '(WT 3II^?T sb*<N> .Y *nwii thWift 3'S^T '^l'4|(yf4, S'al'M'IS, FqMI'yy .1^ -9CS) Mo.q3%2-/08 ^^...^......^..^^........................^^^QQ ai1^1 'q^T (1i?f3^?) ?«nw«^dolF^ PBTTTIONER versus RESPONDENT^ 1 Babu Das K/TEtTTt L°-Jt"kA-t'A? Faaait Mac|! Nagss, Kurt UlSLl. UUI^ Food C-ori Director, yaralsliailiba u^uraj Tlie Exed india, Kajiekar, ] The Oen^ral c tadja. R{ 5, The Empj Through and 9th Cli'cus, N WRIT PBTITIOn UnuBR ART: »B:HON, SHFu DHIREijwDRa, BIISHRA, j 6-1-2009 Shri B.P. Suigh , Advocat^ Shri B.P. Gupta, Adv. for l|he The petiUOHer was workjii^ respondents Food Corporation 4 wlule he was posted at Distt. Q fUed for a direction tp fhe respoj <*l<lf<'t41'f Mllcil' if fe^t <[i|«fi^ ^? sifipi sn^T ManiKpun, K/o Late Kewra Uas aged about 59 years, R/o Behind aa Mohan Malviya School, Siiivaji id. Rosid. Kolika.. BliiJai. Tahsil azid [CG) ^oiation of India, through Managing Head Quarter, New Delhi, 1620 Lane, New Delhi ^ltiye Director, Food Corporation. of Arma, Buuding, Near Aaant |P.S. Baudm (East), Mumbai Manager, Food Corporanoii of {ng Road Choiiliara, Telflinjidha, Raipiu-, C[ulialtisgai-u The Are^L Manager, Food Corppration of India, M^deena Building, iJail Road, Raipur, Chnattis^arh [oyees Provideiit Fund Oi^anizadon, Comissioncr, Rcgional Of&ce, 8t!l Ploor. Mavur BhaAvan, Connaii^ht |sw Dci 11 i — 1 . Il?LB 2%0 OF-THEjCuNSTIruTION Qtf INDIA for the petttioner. respondents. Lag as Assistaat uraae 11 wit& tlie >f India. He retiiTed on l't J'uly, 2004 |Uice, Kaipur. 1'tus petiUon lias been ndents Food Corporatiop_ofindia for ^tTgii'lteKI lW4k'li<<—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000. -;V. -a --^; £•!; >'~t——'''' dll^ifl VI l<'f W <tff^ «>*1 <;.! wwn a)*n«»> 3^ -41*11^1^, si-fllyis, fawiyy ..:, ..to^^2Mo...l<3^^ ^........,..=...3..-^<»..^..:..^....^.;^200 aii^r 'qaqi' (y?3«i<^) ^fliW ^itet <»ft^ wiuun leadued nxation ot tis pension as even pension iias not been tixea. Learaea counsel tor Uie petition may b.e disposed ofwif|i representation for redressal of betore responctent no. l ana t&e) to decide his representation Shri B.P. Gupta, responaents/ foocl Uorporatiofl petitioner tues tpesn represeutaqon complying wiui necessan^ same shaii be decided withiu 4 In view ot tne subruissicla parties, fhis petition is dispose|l inove a representation Detore Ui4 gnevauce aloug witn a copy ot me iiecessanr tomiaunes, anc^ auiected to consifler anct clecide trom. Uie ctate ot receipt ot repre; ^fier lapse of inore thaii 4 years, liis tormatities issida <i>i<i(<"i41'f 'niRJf^'^^ <Fai<si< ^? aiRlH sii^r 1 petltioner subnuts that ttie instant libei-ty to the petitioner to ffle fresh pis gnevances raisecl in ttus penuon responctent No. l be tiuttier du'ected a specmect penod. counsei appearmg tor tQe ol india suomits Uiat ui case Ue along with copy offhis onder after beibre the respondent No. 1, the itiont&s. inacte Dy learaed couasejl tor tne of with Tabei'Vf to the petitioner to respoiideut No. 1 for iTedressal olhis |this order after (GSy complyiag with fhe respondeut No. I is furttier (he same witbia a penod of4 nionths •ntauon. ————gjy_ Dhirendra Mishra Judge ara^T^stegs«iRW(Rnt!?iw—fs/95— i)/zoos—i,00,000.