IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-11-2007 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition Nos.7568 and 7569 of 1999 Writ Petition No.7568 of 1999: Mrs.M.R.Varija .. Petitioner. Versus 1.Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai. 2.The District Registrar, Chengelput District, Chengelput. 3.The Sub Registrar of Registration, Thiruporur-605 110. .. Respondents. Writ Petition No.7569 of 1999: 1.M.R.Premkumar 2.M.P.Aliveni 3.K.R.Sakunthalamma .. Petitioners. Versus 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai-600 028. 2.The District Registrar, Chengelput District, Chengelput. 3.The Sub Registrar of Registration, Thiruporur-605 110. .. Respondents. Prayer in W.P.No.7568 of 1999: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the 3rd respondent in P.91/97, dated 15.5.97 and proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Ka.No.3511/A1/98, dated 12.6.98, and quash the same and forbear the respondents from demanding or collecting any additional stamp duty other than the amount payable as per the face value of the document and any https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ penalty in respect of Pending document No.P.91/97, on the file of the 3rd respondent. Prayer in W.P.No.7569 of 1999: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the 3rd respondent in P.92/97, dated 15.5.97 and proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Ka.No.3512/A1/98, dated 12.6.98, and quash the same and forbear the respondents from demanding or collecting any additional stamp duty other than the amount payable as per the face value of the document and any penalty in respect of Pending document No.P.92/97, on the file of the 3rd respondent. For petitioners : Mr.T.S.Sivagnanam For respondents : Mr.V.Manoharan Government Advocate COMMON ORDER Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners had submitted that the issue involved in the above writ petitions is covered by the decision of this Court made in W.A.Nos.1114 to 1124 of 1997, dated 16-12-1997 (SAS Relators Private Limited Rep. by its Director T.S.S.Krishnan Madras-17 and others Vs. The Sub-Registrar, S.R.O.Adyar, Madras-20 and another). Hence, nothing survives in these writ petitions. 2. In view of the above submission, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Sd/- Asst. Registrar. /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar. csh To 1.Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai. 2.The District Registrar, Chengelput District, Chengelput. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The Sub Registrar of Registration, Thiruporur-605 110. 2 ccs to Mr.T.S. Sivagnanam, Advocate, sr. 67361 2 ccs to Government Pleader, Sr. 67644, 67643 Writ Petition Nos.7568 and 7569 of 1999 SJ (CO) kk 20/11 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/