:'2^ ^ ;-< Petitioner Resoondents Writ PetiBon No. S9 of2006 S.N. Rajput, Age 58 years, S/o. Late Shri Phaggu Ram Rajput, Retd. Asstt. Engineer, C.G. Housing Board, Raipur. 1) 2) Versus The State Govt. of C.G., through the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Environment Deptt., D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. Municipal Corporation, Commsisioner. Bhiia'i, through 3) Housing Commissioner, C.G. Housing Boarsd, H.O. Shankar Nagar, Raipur. 4) Shri Javed Asgar, Superintending Engineer, C.G. Housing Board, Shanker Nagar, Raipur. (Writ Petition under Articie 226/227 of the Constitution of india) SS: Hon'bSs hfflr. Shri Somkant Verma, oounsel for the petitioner, Smt. Binu Sharma, Panel Lawyer for the State. (Passedon 11<h February,a%) Learned counsei appearing for the petiiioner submits that the date of birth of the petitioner is 1-10-1947 and the age of retirement, after attaining the age of superannaition, is 58 years. Accordingty, the petitioner was retired on 30-9-2005 (Annexure P/1). The respondents-authorities vide oireuiar dated 31-10-2005 (Annexure P/4) increased the age of retirement from 58 years to 60 years tn case of Class IV emptoyees The petitioner claims relief under circuiar a'ated 31-10-2005 (Annexure P/4). 2) Admittedly, the petitioner was retired on 30-9-2005 after attaining the age of superannuation i.e., 58 years. The oircutar dated 31-10-2005, whereby the age of retirement was increased by two years, was issued one month thereafter. The petitioner oannot take advantage of subsequent cireular which came into operation 2-. ?8iU with eifect from 31-10-2005. There is no merit in the case as the petittoner has already been retired on attainingthe age of superannuation i.e., 58 yeare. 3) This petition is devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotrl Judge