^d^ ,^s^fs-f,K ES\Sn SI^SLE S;;t^^r3 .^••"'••i^'ff\Ly-> ^•^•^^^c ^^gvy^.1 Oi*aii'"" IN THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, CHHATTISGARH At BILASPUR Writ Petition No.J^^T-T'2006 PETITIONER V. S. Vijayan S/o Late Shri. Shivram Pillai, Aged about 48 Years, Employed as Assistant Grade-III, O/o Sub-Divisional Officer, E&M, Repairs and Reclamation, Sub-Division, Water Resources Department, DURG Residing at: MIG-543, Padmanabhpur DURG (CG). Versus RESPONDENTS : ^° -A". 's\ 'v"'?-?'^'^ // .^'"' s's-f •'^-y ^i£££^a ^ -^0?1^ <-" 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, RAIPUR- 491002 (CG) 2. TheChiefEngineer, Water Resources Department, Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Lines, RAIPUR-492001 (CG) 3. The ChiefEngineer, Mahanadi Project, Raipur Water Resources Department, S.R.P.Chowk, ShankarNagarRoad, RAIPUR-492001 (CG) 4. The Superintending Engineer, Electrical and Mechanical Division, Water Resources Department, Civil Lines, RAIPUR - 492001(CG) The Executive Engineer, Heavy Equipment (E&M) Division, Water Resources Deptt. OCM-Chowk Irrigation Department, RAIPUR (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 QTL^THE CONSTITUTION OF mDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS m THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY, MANDAMUS ETC. XI-HC-78 *11*<MI Sh*1|ch 3^'-qraT?ra', ®xflM'i6,R^itiy w.1p....^.y..f'.^ ^[200 311^1 4ath (vt^l'i'T) SD^T ?)T f^HR; iprr sn^r gOTRi S^tTWflfl(T3tI^T 21.7.2006 tKe inspilje sttows Shri B.P. R<m, Advocate for Y^e Shri Satish ©upta,by. 6ovT. Heard. The main grievance of the p4ti been granted annual increment 11 Perusal of Annexure P-4 Executive Engineer, Heavy Bqulpmer^t recommended the cose of The Enqineer, E <& M Division, WR&, Rai| respondent No.4. Therefore, without expressin|g petitioner may approach respond( bivision, WRD, Raipur and in turn, respondent No.O- fcxecutive trngine^r liaipur and pass appropriate orders two months from today. With the aforesaid, the peti Certified copy as per rules. petitioner. ^dv. for the State on advance copy. qii<<t<'i41i wsi ff fs<Si tRitAK ^arf^rrsn^r p4titioner in this petition 'is that he has not ot passing typing exanination. that on 3.7.2006 respondent No.5- (E<&M) Division, 'WRQ, Rdpur has already peti^-ioner to respondent No.4-Superintendinq fpw, which is pendirg consideration before ssin|g any opinion on the merits of the case, the ^nt No.4-Superintending Engineer, E<SM Ihe is to consider the recommendation of ', Heavy Equipment (E&M) t)ivision, WRt>, |n dccordance with iaw within The per-iod of ion stands disposed ot. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O. fc>