IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.623 of 2011 NEELAM DEVI W/o Late Manoj Ram R/o Musallahpur Haat Dom Khana, P.S.-Sultanganj, Dist.- Patna Versus 1.PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION through its Mayor, Budh Marg, Patna 2.Municipal Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Budh Marg, Patna 3.Chief Accounts Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Budh Marg, Patna 4.Executive Officer, Bankipur Anchal, Patna Municipal Corporation, Lohanipur, Patna ----------- 2. 12.1.2011. Heard Mr.Manoj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Bishwa Bibhuti Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents-Patna Municipal Corporation. The petitioner’s husband, who was a Sanitary Worker in Bankipur Anchal, Patna Municipal Corporation, died on 15.5.2010 in harness. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that despite filing representation, the respondent- authorities have not paid death-cum-retiral dues of the husband of the petitioner and other retiral dues. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 i.e. Municipal Commissioner- cum-Chief Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Budh Marg, Patna within a period of three weeks from today. If such representation is filed the respondent-authority particularly respondent no.2 is directed to examine the same and pass an appropriate order for redressal of the grievances of the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of filing of such 2 representation. In case of refusal, the respondent no. 2 is directed to pass a speaking order within the aforesaid time. With the above observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)