[1] S.B. Review Petition No.11/2008 in S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1796/07 Takhat Singh Kothari Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER: 01.04.2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. Pankaj Sharma for petitioner Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. By filing certain documents on record, it has been contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that these documents were not filed alongwith the writ petition but these documents show that the petitioner is in possession of the land. The scope of review is limited, it is not open to re- appreciate any evidence while deciding review petition, the error apparent can be rectified. Obviously, in this case, by way of filing documents alongwith the review petition, the petitioner wants to make out a case that he is in possession of the land but those documents were not on record at the time of adjudication, therefore, at the time of deciding review application, the new [2] evidence cannot be taken on record. The petitioner is trying to make out a case by way of filing documents with the review petition that he is in possession of the land so also pursuing business as per Annex.A/2 dated 10th April, 2007 but this fact itself give strength to the observation made by this Court that petitioner is not in possession of the land because in whole of the writ petition it is nowhere contended by the petitioner that he is pursuing business. Therefore, no case is made out for review of the judgment given by this Court. Hence, this review petition is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS) J. jpa/s-2