:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1857 OF 2005 Mahobbob Mahamulal Nadaf ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr.I.M.Khairdi, for the Applicant. Mr.V.B. Konde Deshmukh, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 23rd March 2005 P.C.: . Learned A.P.P. fairly states on instructions that the Applicant is entitled for bail on parity with co-accused Ramchandra Nivarutti Pawar, who has already been released on bail by this Court. Accordingly, this application succeeds on the same terms on which co-accused Pawar has been released on bail on the :2: following terms. (A) The Applicant is directed to be released on bail in connection with CR.No.II-22/1999, registered with Solapur Taluka Police Station, Solapur, on executing personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with one or two local sureties in the like amount. (B) The Applicant shall not influence the prosecution witnesses or tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner whatsoever. (C) The Applicant shall report to the investigating officer once in a week on Saturday between 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. till filing of the chargesheet. (D) The Applicant shall extend full co-operation to the investigating officer as well as to the trial Court for early disposal of the trial. If the trial :3: Court is of the opinion that the Applicants are responsible for delay in trial, that fact be recorded in the roznama, which can be a ground for cancellation of bail. . Application disposed of on the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)