SijfaisS i iSK.aSpy iui-s'iu'n ^ C^fvs / IN THE fflGH COURT OF_CIfflATTISGARH AT BBLASPUR W.P. (s) No. ..^J.:J.........12Q Li^. PETITIONER <- ^ ^3^ '%p; <&y?^ ..-•" Radhey Kishun Pat^. S/o Late Shri Lachhan lal Pat& aged about 45 years Post - Assistant - Teacher Govt. Primary School, Chirchari kurdh Block Chhuria Distt. Rajnandgaon VERSUS y^AI ik^SESPONDENTS: 1: State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur x^J^ (C-G-) ^//\£!<AV'C?^ District Education Officer, Chhuria, O."' ^ District Rajnandgaon (C.Gs) (^- ^" ^3: Block Education Officer Block- Chhuria District- Rajpandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETmON U/A 226/2Tr0F THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WMTS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DffiECTIONS The above named petitioner most humbly and respectfally begs to submit as under:- HI6H COURT OF CHHAmSfiARH AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON-BLE Mft. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRTT PFTrriON tS) NO 464 OF 2007 Petitioner versus ftesoondents Hemrai Kumbhkar State of Chhaf'isgarh and others Petitioner WRTT PFTmON fS.) N0. 465 OF 2007 Siddharth Chaure versus Respondents : State of Chhdrttisgarh and o-thers WRTT PETTnON fS.1 N0. 466 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Respondents Panch Ram 5ohu State of Chhatl-isgarh and o-thers WRTT PETTTION IS.) N0. 467 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents yersys Manharan Lol Prthouru State of Chhattisgarh and o'thers WRTTPETTnON (S.) N0. 468 OF 2007 Petitioner KesBondents versus Yaggaya Datta Baghel State of Chhatl-isgarh and o-Hwrs WRTT PETmON fS/1 N0 469 OF 2007 Petitioner ftespondents versus Shikt Khaperdoy State of Chherttisgarh and others WRTT PETITION (S.) N0 470 OF 2007 Petitioner : Radhey Kishun Patel versus ftesoondents : Stote of Chhattisgarh and o-thers wprr pErmoN (5.} NO. 471 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus AAangonLal State of Chhattisgarh and o+hers WRTT PETITION (5.) N0. 472 OF 2007 Petitioner : Dhal Singh Sonwoni versus Respondents : Stnte of Chhatt'isgarh ond o'thers WRH- PETTTION (S.) N0. 473 OF 2007 - Petitioner : Onkar Lal Sonboir versus Respondents : S'hate of Chhwttisgarh ond o'thers WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 474 OF 2007 Petitioner : Shiv Kumar Sharma versus Respondents ; State of Chhatt-isgarh and others WRTT PETTTION (5.1 N0. 475 OF 2007 Petitioner Resnondents yerajs Rajendro Kumar Sagar State qf Chhattisgarh ond o-thers ^o WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 476 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Makhanlal Thakur State of Chhattisgarh and o-thers WKTT PETTTION (S.VNO. 477 OF 2007 Petitioner yersys ftespondents Fool Chond Kamleshwar State of Chhattisgarh and o'thers WRTT PETTTION (S.) N0. 478 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Respondents Ra^endra Kumar Dewongan State of Chhatt'isgarh ond others And WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 479 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents yersys Joyant Kumar Shendey Slate of Othattisgarh ond others Present : Mr. R.K. Jaiswul, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. 5ushil Dubey, ©ovemment Adwcate for •the Sta-te/respondents. OR&ER (Passed on 24th Dey of January, 2007) 1. Leamed oounsel oppearffig for •the petitioners as well os leamed fiovemment Advocate oppearing for the State/respondents jointly submit thdt -the facts and question of law mvolved m the present batch of writ petitions are squarety covered by -the decision of this Court m the case of Yoshwwvt Kumor Wwwehw^ vs. Munle^ol CoiyoiwrHon. Ouy tind aneirtw^. 2. In subsequent cases. i.e., Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (.Sopesfi Kumar Vsrmavs. Thc State Sovt. of ChhaMyarh end wwtfiw^ ond other connected nwrtters, decided by •this ^-><- /^ Court- on 15-12-2006. pursuant to -the memo dated 28-1-1995. isajed by the Secretary. Board of Secondar/ Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclature of the Basic Troining Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been chanyd and renamed as Diploma in EAicotion, i.e., b.Ed. Accordmgly. the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (jSopedi Kumar Vermavs, Jhe State Sovt. of Chhatfisgarfi and wwthef) (Supra). 3. For •the aforeraentioned reasons, Ihe writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of -this Court in the matter of Ya^iwant Kumar Bhai"adwaj(Suiptv}. subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.T.I./b.Ed. Cert-ificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether •they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of this order be placed on -the record of -the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006ai) PJK-C696 Thakur