IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7500 of 1993 M/S NANDLAL & COMPANY Versus STATE & ORS with CWJC No.10145 of 1993 UPENDRA PRASAD YADAV Versus STATE & ORS with CWJC No.7499 of 1993 BHARAT SHAH Versus STATE & ORS with CWJC No.10162 of 1993 ASHOK SINGH Versus STATE & ORS with CWJC No.7509 of 1993 SACHI KANT MISHRA Versus STATE & ORS with CWJC No.9812 of 1993 LACHHAN DEO SINGH Versus STATE & ORS with CWJC No.9801 of 1993 ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA Versus STATE & ORS with CWJC No.9577 of 1993 RAM PRAVESH RAI & ORS Versus STATE & ORS ----------- 06. 06.05.2010 No one appears for the petitioners. None for the State. The claim in these applications is for refund of sales tax on a works contract with interest. The writ 2 petitions were directed to be heard along with C.W.J.C. No. 7966 of 1993. The latter has been allowed by a Division Bench on 30.09.1999. Presumably for that reason the petitioners have lost interest to pursue the matter. It needs no reiteration that when a writ petition is allowed on a question of law, it applies to all similarly situated and they are not required to produce separate orders. This becomes more onerous when the writ petition is directed to be heard along with similar matters which has already been disposed off by reasoned order. The writ petitions are allowed in similar terms as C.W.J.C. No. 7966 of 1993(M/S National Building Construction Corporation Limited versus The State of Bihar and Others) with like directions. Shageer (Navin Sinha, J) (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)