/ 1 / IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1732 OF 2006 Shri.Shailesh Sadashiv Ugale & Anr. ...Petitioners V/s. Shri.Mohanlal Dhanraj Oswal @ Jain ...Respondent Mr.S.M. Kamble for Petitioners. Mr.Rajesh S. Datar for Respondent. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : 6th FEBRUARY, 2008. P.C:- 1. Petitioners are challenging the order passed by the Trial Court dated 28/11/2005. By the said order, the Trial Court rejected the application of the Petitioners/Original Plaintiffs to exhibit certified copies of the documents which were not in possession of the Respondent/Defendant. The Trial Court has observed that the Petitioner have not complied with the provisions of Section 65 and 66 of Indian Evidence Act and therefore, these documents cannot be exhibited as a secondary evidence. 2. It is an admitted position that these documents are in possession of a person in whose favour these documents have been executed. / 2 / Petitioner can very well call upon this witness to produce these documents and thereafter, if the documents are not produced, he may apply to the Court for bringing on record certified copies of these documents as a secondary evidence. Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to ask the witness to produce original documents. With these clarification, writ petition is disposed of. . V.M. KANADE, J.