IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 230 of 2010(O&M) Date of decision:17th August, 2011 Dalbir Singh .......Petitioner Versus Smt. Neelam and others ........Respondents BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr. Vikramjit Singh, Advocate for Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar Ghangas, Advocate for the respondents. A.N.Jindal, J.(Oral) Admittedly, respondent No. 1 is a wife and respondent Nos. 2 to 5 are minor children. ` 800/- p.m to the wife respondent No. 1 and ` 300/- p.m to each have been awarded as maintenance to respondent Nos. 2 to 5. Now a days even a daily wager is earning ` 200/- per day therefore, his prayer that he is unable to pay the maintenance to wife and his minor children cannot be accepted. No ground is made out to interfere. Dismissed. [A.N.JINDAL] JUDGE 17th August, 2011 Shivani Kaushik