IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP Nos. 2144, 2146, 2147, 2148 and 2149 of 2011 Decided on: April 19, 2011 1. CWP No. 2144 of 2011 Ajay Kumar vs. State of H.P. and ors. 2. CWP No. 2146 of 2011 Ravi Bhushan Singh vs. State of H.P. and ors. 3. CWP No. 2147 of 2011 Mohinder Singh vs. State of H.P. and ors. 4. CWP No. 2148 of 2011 Krishan Chand vs. State of H.P. and ors. 5. CWP No. 2149 of 2011 Sham Singh vs. State of H.P. and ors. _______________________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Haresh Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A. G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) These writ petitions are filed with the identical prayers, one set of such prayers is as follows:- “a. That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner to be re-designated as pump-operator in facts and circumstances enumerated as above. b. That the respondents may kindly be directed to decide the representation for considering the case of the petitioner to be re- designated as pump-operator.” 2. There will be a direction to the fourth respondent/competent authority to take decision on Annexure P-6, representation (s) in accordance with 2 law within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner concerned. 3. With the above observations, writ petitions stand disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice April 19, 2011 (Justice Sanjay Karol), (Rana/pankaj) Judge.