IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10956 of 2011 MUNNU PRASAD MAHTO @ MUNNA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 25.04.2011 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 366, 376 of the I.P.C. It appears that accusation was found false and final form was submitted but subsequently differing with the same, cognizance has been taken in the matter. It appears that petitioner has moved against the Sessions Judge order for anticipatory bail in 2008, on that ground alone, this Court is not inclined to interfere but in view of the fact that accusation was found false, it is a fit case for grant of regular bail. Let the petitioner surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today and pray for regular bail when the learned Court below will pass appropriate order keeping in view that final form has been submitted as the accusation was found false and also considering the fact that informant has subsequently retracted from his initial version and a compromise has been filed between the parties in connection with K. Nagar P.S. Case No. 219 of 2007. Let the order of this Court be transmitted through FAX to the learned Court below at the cost of the 2 petitioner. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)