IN THE HIGH COURT OF EARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED TIllS TIlE II DAY OF YJNE 2010 BEFORE THE HON t BLE MR.JUSTICE A.5.PACHHAPURE CRIMINI APPEAL NO.989 OF 2009 BETWEEN 1. YAMIJNAPPA 5/0 BHIMAPPA KORAGASRA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS OCr : ARRACK rONTRACTnR R/ A MALLENAHALL I SHIKARIPUR TALUK SHIMOGA. APPELLANT (By SRI : N . M DESHAPANDE ADV , FOR APPELLANT. ) I KRISHNAPPA 5/0 NARASIMHAPPA ILIGERA AGED ABOUT MAJOR 0CC: ARRACK CONTRACTOR PJA HIREKERUR TALUK 2 JAGAD:SR S / 0 DEVENDRAPPAKALAL Pi 1 JT Tc oc. ARR:K ONTRACTOR R/ A HIRFERUP TALUK 3 DAGARAJ Sf0 DE TUDPAPPA D: ARRACK BUSINESS R/D IIREKERUR ALUY. RESPONDENTS DPLA. FILED U/S.378(3 & () CRP.C BY ADV., FOR THE PPELLANi PRAYiNG THAT THIS HON1 BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 291O.09 PASSED BY THE C.J. JR.DN.) & JMFC., SHIKARIPUPP. IN C.CN0.833/2CO — ACQUiTTING 1SF RESPuNDENTSiACCUSED FOR THE Q’FFEI’4CE P’U’S34I, 324 ANt) 42 P1W SEC. 34 OF IPC. THIS CRLA.COM±NG ON FOR ORDERS, THIS flAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Learned Counel for the appellant absent. Tar: days time grarted to comply the Office ohjectiona If the Office objections are not complied within the rime granted, the appal stands dismzsed without reference ± n thc> Rgnrh SD/— JUDGE / / /“ —/ r 13 3 0!’ ‘ ttaRa I