C9 Hemant Kumar Dridankar, S/e. Shri GR. Dridankar, aged about 37 years, Assistant Tea¢her, Govt. Middle SChool - Parsapali, Block—Nagar'i, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) Roopdhan Singh Netam, S/o. Shri Anjor Singh Netam, aged about 37 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle Schooi-Birudi, Block - Nagari, Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) Chait Ram Kaushik, 8/0. Shri Chheduram Kaushik, aged about 38 years, Assistant Teacher. Govt. Ideal Middle School - FarsiwakBlock - Nagari, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.). Versus :1. Rspondents e State of Chhattisga‘rh, Through-The Secretary Department of Education DKS. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) District Education Officer, Block - Nagari Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) SB: Hon’ble'Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vinay Pandey, Panel lawyer for the respondents/State. O R D E R (Passed on this 22“a Day of March, 2007) l i Sd/— ‘ l Satish K.Agnihetri Judge HIGH GOURT OF CHHTTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S} No. 1724 of 2.007 Petiticner -1 .. ‘he question of law involved herein asto’whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. . Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for . the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved the present writ petition are the same to that ofin W.P. (s) No. 5976 of 2006 (Sushil Tiwari & others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.1 1 .2006. ln view of the above-stated submission made by learned counsel for'the parties, the-writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to l J J A . .T .,