HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 2396 01‘2088 PETITEONERS . Dhal Singh Bisen, aged about 41 years: son of Shri Nemi Chand Bisen, presently working as ~ Paiwari, Haika No. 32, Tab. Rajnandgaon (CG) 2. Ripusudan Prasad Upadhyay, aged about 52 years, son of Shri Akhand Manda} Prasad Upadhyay, working as Revenue Inspector, Coliectorate (Land Record), Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS . State of Chhattisgarh, through the Chief Secretary, Dau Kaiyzm Singh Bhawao, Raipur (C.G.) 2. State of Madhya Pradesh, through the Chief Secretaxy, Goverrmlent of Madhya Pradesh, Bailabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP) 3. Commissioner, Land Records and Settlement, State of Madhya Pradesh, Gwalior (MP) 4. Commissioner, Land Records, State of Chhartisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 5. Union of India through — Ministry of Personnel Public Grievarlces and Training, Khan Market, New Delhi. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satieh K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri V.Vijay, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Amrito Das, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondeni No. 1 and 4. Shri Kashif Shakeel, Advocate for the Union of Indiafrespondent No. 5. ORAL ORDER (Passed on Olst day of May, 2008) I With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing the matter finally. '2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that he does not want to press this petition on merit, except that the petitioners be permitted to make _a representation to the Committee in light of‘xthe judgment. and order dated 17th April, 2007 passed by this Court in I /. . B.R.Godbola Vs. Municipal Corporatian Durg and others {2007(2) CGLJ 41 7}? to which learned counsel appearing for the respondem/State have no objection. Accordingiy, the petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. the Committee so constituted is directed to consider the representations made by the petitioners, if their representations are not considered earlier. In the event: if it is not considered eariier, the fresh representation may be considered: as early as possibie within a period of four months from the date of receipt of representation. This exercise on the part of the Government of India may be completed Within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit