BA-739-11.sxw 1 Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.739 OF 2011 Ramusing Chauhan ... Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra, Thru' Kalamboli Police Station, Panvel, Raigad ... Respondent Mr. Aniket Nikam for the Applicant. Mrs. A.A. Mane, APP, for the Respondent. CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 28 TH JUNE, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. The learned Advocate for the Applicant submits that the co-accused have already been released on bail. According to him, there is no sufficient material against the Applicant so as to justify his further detention in custody. 3. Mrs. Mane, the learned APP, however, submits that, in this case, charge has already been framed on 20th June, 2011. She states that the muddemal articles have been deposited in Court. If that is so, the trial can be expected to be over within a short time. BA-739-11.sxw 2 Dixit 4. Since the trial can be disposed of at an early date, I do not go deeper into the merits of the Bail Application and examine the same. It would be proper to direct the trial to be expedited and dispose it of within the specified time. The prayer for bail can be considered, should the trial be not over within that time. 5. The Bail Application is rejected. 6. However, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and complete it by 6th August, 2011. 7. Liberty to the Applicant to apply afresh for bail, should the trial be not over by that time. [A.M. THIPSAY, J.]