IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23453 of 2010 BABLOO YADAV, SON OF SRI SUBHASH PRASAD @ SUBHASH PRASAD YADAV @ SUBHASH YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAYA TOLA KUMHRAR, POLICE STATION KUMHRAR, DISTRICT-PATNA. …..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Bhatnagar (Adv.) For the State : APP. ----------- 05/ 08.09.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner’s prayer for bail was rejected earlier on two occasions considering the fact that he is husband of the deceased of the case under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation that prior to death, the victim was being pressurized to bring the additional dowry. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the doctor has given a certificate that the victim was ready to give statement before the police but the police has not recorded her statement only with a view to victimize the petitioner. A report has been called for and from the report it appears that trial was delayed to some extent due to the transfer of the Sessions Case from Patna to Patnacity. Considering the facts and circumstances 2 of the case, presently, I am not inclined to grant bail to the above named petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is again rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before the learned court below, if the informant does not support the prosecution case in course of trial. kksinha/- (Shyam kishore Sharma, J.)