1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2384 OF 2007 Siddharth Bholanath Srivastava ..Petitioner V/s. Powerpack Finance & Investments ..Respondents Pvt. Ltd. & anr. Mr.Subhash Zha, Senior Counsel i/b.M/s.Law Global, advocate, for petitioner Mr.Kishor Bhatia, advocate, for respondent No.1 Mr.Y.S.Shinde, Assistant Public Prosecutor, for the State CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 15TH JANUARY, 2008 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. It appears that Vipul Modi has been cross examined for a long time and still his cross examination could not be completed on 11th December, 2007 by 5.00 P.M inspite of commitment given by the learned counsel for the accused/petitioner and therefore, the Metropolitan Magistrate closed his cross examination. After some discussion, the learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement that he will not take more than two hours for cross 2 examination. According to him, the delay has been caused because the witness did not bring all the documents reqired for the purpose of cross examination. The learned counsel for the respondents makes a statement that the witness shall appear before the trial Court with all the documents which may be required by the accused/petitioner, provided the list of the documents is given to the prosecution. 2. In view of the above, Writ Petition stands disposed of with a direction that witness P.W.1 Vipul Modi shall remain present before the trial Court on 18th January, 2008 with all the documents which are already required or which may be required by giving a list by tomorrow by the accused/petitioner. The learned trial Court shall allow the advocate for accused/petitioner to cross examine witness with a condition that time limit for the cross examination shall be two hours and the learned counsel for the petitioner shall not take any more time. 3 (J.H.BHATIA, J.)