IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31045 of 2010 AKSHAY LAL BHAGAT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 12.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is husband of the deceased alleged for demand causing torture for the same soon before the death within 7 years of the marriage in matrimonial house and unnatural death. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that two of the co-accused having similar allegation have been allowed bail by different Benches of this Court and there is no external injury on the person of the deceased but petitioner cannot be equated with his elder brother and his wife who have been allowed bail in this case, as they were residing outside the province. Postmortem Report also goes to show that death was not natural one. Remaining of injury is not necessary and in 304B of the I.P.C. cases when discussed ingredients exist, it is for the accused to explain the cause of death which he is lacking. If some witnesses appear to favour him about quarrel and suicide by the deceased that also does not favour him, presumption is there for abetment in the case of suicide also. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)