IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.12255 of 2009 Between: M/s. M. Ameeruddin & Co., Commission Agent, Gaddiannaram, Hyderabad, Rep., by its Managing Partner. … Petitioner And Agricultural Market Committee, Gaddiannaram, rep., by its Chairman & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri P. Gangaiah Naidu Senior Counsel for Sri N. Bharat Babu Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri V.V.N. Narayana Rao SC for Agricultural Market Committee This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12255 of 2009 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for a Writ of Certiorari to quash order dated 17.06.2009 passed by respondent No.1. This writ petition was elaborately heard in the forenoon session. Sri V.V.N. Narayana Rao, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 Market Committee requested for a pass over to get instructions from his client whether it is willing to issue a fresh notice to the petitioner and pass an order after considering the explanation, if any submitted by the petitioner. Accordingly, the case was passed over. In the afternoon, Sri S. Krishna Reddy, Chairman of respondent No.1 Committee has been present in the Court and after consulting his client, learned Standing Counsel conveyed to the Court that respondent No.1 agreed for issuing a fresh notice in the face of the plea raised by the petitioner that he was denied proper opportunity to submit his explanation. In view of this concession made on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2, the impugned order is set aside. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are given liberty to issue a show cause notice to the petitioner and pass a fresh order after considering the explanation, if any received from the petitioner in accordance with the procedure prescribed under Rule 52 of the Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Live Stock) Markets Rules, 1969. The writ petition is accordingly allowed. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition in the manner indicated above, WPMP.No.15827 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 24.06.2009 Note:- Issue CC in three days. B/o. ES