IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 8TH MARCH 2011 / 17TH PHALGUNA 1932 Mat.Appeal.No. 316 of 2008() ---------------------------- OS.196/2007 of FAMILY COURT,KOLLAM .................... APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS 2 AND 3: --------------------------------------------- 1. JERVAS BHAI CHRISTIE, S/O. JERVAS, AGED 65 YEARS, MAGLENE, KARUMALIL ROAD, THANKASSERY, KOLLAM. 2. STANLY CHRISTIE, W/O. JERVAS BHAI CHRISTIE, AGED 54 YEARS, MAGLENE, KARUMALIL ROAD, THANKASSERY, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.SIVARAJ RESPONDENTS: PLAINTIFFS & 1ST DEFENDANTS: ------------------------------------------- 1. SMITHA, D/O. XAVIER, AGED 28 YEARS, STEPHEN LAND, NEENDAKARA P.O., KOLLAM. 2. JOSHUA MAXIMUS JOSEPH, AGED 5 YEARS (MINOR), DATE OF BIRTH 18-12-2003, STEPHEN LAND, NEENDAKARA P.O., KOLLAM REPRESENTED BY MOTHER SMITHA 3. JOSEPH MANOJ, S/O. J.B.CHRISTIE, AGED 33 YEARS, MAGLENE, KARUMALIL ROAD, THANKASSERY, KOLLAM. ADDL. 4. THE MOUNT CARMEL CONVENT THANGASSERY, KOLLAM REPRESENTED BY THE MOTHER SUPERIOR IS IMPLEADED AS ADDL. 4TH RESPONDENT AS PER ORDER DT.3.9.2008 IN MAT.APPEAL 316 OF 2008 ADV. SMT.P.K.RADHIKA FOR R3 SRI.AJAYA KUMAR. G FOR R1 & 2 SRI.P RATHEESH.P FOR R3 SRI VINOY VARGHESE KALLUMMOOTTIL FOR R3 THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M. JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS JJ., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mat. Appeal No. 316 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT Joseph J., This is an appeal filed by appellants/defendants 2 and 3 against the money decree granted in favour of respondents 1 and 2, who are the plaintiffs in the Court below. The appellants are the parents of the third respondent. 2. Today when the matter came up, it is submitted on behalf of the appellants and respondents 1 and 2 that they have settled the claim between themselves. The learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submits that they have no further claim as against the appellants. 3. In the light of the same, we dispose of the appeal by recording the submission on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 that the decree as against the appellants has been satisfied. Mat. Appeal No. 316 of 2008 :2: I.A No. 2787 of 2010 in Mat.Appeal No. 316 of 2008 In view of the settlement between the parties, we order that the petitioners are permitted to take back the original sale Deed No.2242 of 88 of S.R.O Kollam from the Registry of this Court. K.M. JOSEPH, (JUDGE) M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, (JUDGE) dl/