^ .Ac IN THEHON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. lc l NO'.^Q (/2-/200S PETITIONEI^) •peSei-c-l £^J> f'^-r j^tfclc- k^A-- trrf.c'-S' ^^^ A/ll"1 c^;r:: "^\'^ Shambhu Charan S/o Shri Hiralal Aged about - 60Years Occupation- Agriculturist R/o Village - Dongamoha P.S.- Tamnar, Tahsil - Tamnar District -Raigarh ( C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS ; 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of mines and minerals , D.K.S. Bhawan District - Raipur (C.G.) ^ 2. Collector, Raigarh Dist- Raigarh (C.G.) / 3. Sub Divisional Officer Sub Division Gharghoda, Dist-Raigarh (C.G.) / 4. Station House Officer Police station-Tamnar, Dist- Raigarh (C.G.) ^ ^5. Jindal Steel dnd Captive Powerplant. Tamnar, Through its Executive Director Kharsia Road Raigarh (C.G.) WRTT PBTJTION UNDERAKTJCI^ 226/227 OF THE CONSTFTUTION OFINDZA -^ Petitioner HSGttCOURTOFGHHATnSQARHATBlLASPUR WRn'PErmON(mN0.7D42of Shambhu Charan Versus Respondents : Stgte orchhattisgarh & Others" WRrTPETiTiON(ietNO!,6090of2009 Petitioner Respondents Versus ShambhuCRaran StatebfGhhattisgarh&Qthers WRITPETiTION(JNDERARTtCLE226ffi270FTHECONSTITUTIQNOFINDIA (SB:Hon'bleMr.SirtishK.Ji^nihotri,J.) Present:- Ms.Dipalj PandeY.AdvoeateforttTepetitioner; ShnP.I<.Bhaduri^Panel]l-®wyer?6rtheStatle/resp6ndertts :No.1;to::4i':-'l:''::'% <'^^^ Shri B.Dit3uru with Shri She^hank ThaKur. Advocates for the respondenfrNo.5. ::' •':;;.;:::;:: /; . ,' • i'•.l'..:':' J:.lfi:l ' •{Fiassed,-oh';26tB/8a^:S>efol3er»20l.O):.: ':,.:; '•^ ^ ::. 1. The casg ;c^ tRe petitiione^ jsf;ttiat thei respon^^^^^ undertaldr^ mining Qperation iirt the Isnd^^ ^ No.104/4ka, khasra No.104Ndia, ttiasra No.104?5ka, ittiiasra . No.104/®ta, khasra No.105/6, sityated at vitlage^ Dohg|nioha, Tahsil Tatnnar, Qjstriet Raigatt^; under the ownership jof the petitiqner,; whieh have hot ibeen J soid: ti^ the petitionerjjto the respondentNo;5ynauthpFisiedlyx)rillegally. j .4^ 2. A report was calledi^ the'Mining tnspedor,w report s^ing the facfr^fiBat there|s;rio ittegal irn^ .^-/:'¥.....^^<^.'^1.^ ''i^ r.:.i;.N;.]^':::;':::'.: belongingitothe.petitiGiner.,'-?^? ;'r' ^•','J.:';^; ~ '',.:^]:i i';l •.^J :: w :yM: ;:1ii lilli ~9K •e'Bite s •2 3. Be that a&it may, it is not possible for tHis Court to idel' ownership of the land on the basis of affidavits and the report and further wHether mjning operation is going on in the land hetd by the petitioner or in the land sold by the petittoner to respondent No.5, or any other land. Thus, it would be just and proper that the Collector.Raigarhniaybedirectedtolookintothegrievance ofttie petitioner and ensure that no mining'bperation takes piace in the land heid by the petitioner in any case, by the respondent No.5 or any other agency without following due process of law. 4. It is further directed that the Collector shall examine the dispute after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other cohcerned parties.The needful may^be done as eariv as possibleipreferablywittiih aperiodoffourweeks. 5. Accordingly, the writ petitiQrt is djsposed of. No onlerastofiosts. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i Ashok :£-