Civil Revision No. 370 of 2010 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 370 of 2010 Date of decision : 20.1.2010 Arun Duggal ....Petitioner Versus Chander Singh Yadav and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Arvind Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. S. D. ANAND, J. It was a suit for specific performance which Chander Singh Yadav-respondent had filed on the basis of agreement dated 11.1.1992. The case was fixed for recording of evidence of defendant therein when the petitioner came forward with an application under Section 151 C.P.C. to obtain the leave of the Court to forward the relevant agreement to the General Manager, Indian Security Press, Nasik (Maharashtra). The indicated purpose was to obtain a report about when exactly the revenue stamp of Rs.1/- had been printed, supplied and marketed for sale. The learned Trial Judge declined the plea by noticing that Rs.1/- stamp came to be issued by the Government of India for the first time with effect from 13.5.1994. It was on that factual premises that the learned Trial Court felt that no useful purpose would be served by forwarding the stamp to security press. I find myself in complete agreement with the line of reasoning adopted by the learned Trial Judge. It is apparent from the pleadings of the parties that the suit had been filed on the basis of agreement dated 11.1.1992. Rs. 1/- stamp came into vogue with effect from 13.5.1994. In that view of things, it was obviously for the affected party to raise whatever plea it wanted in the light of facts noticed above. Faced with the predicament of having to wriggle out of the facts noticed above, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner Civil Revision No. 370 of 2010 -2- **** states that the petitioner appears to have missed out certain facts from the application which (facts) may have relevant bearing on the adjudication of such like plea. This petition shall stand dismissed. The petitioner, may if he so likes, file a plea afresh before the learned Trial Court. The plea, if at all comes to be filed, shall indicate what exact information/facts had been left out from the earlier presentation. Disposed of accordingly. January 20, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE