IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2011 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 1795 of 2011() ----------------------------- CC.192/2007 of J.M.F.C.,CHITTUR .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED --------------------------------------- 1. THANKARAJ, S/O. VELLINGIRI, AGED 28 YEARS, MOONKILMADA KALAM, GOPALAPURAM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. SHANMUGAN, S/O. MANOHARAN, AGED 32 YEARS, NEAR RTO CHECKPOST, GOPALAPURAM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. DINESHKUMAR, S/O. PAZHANISWAMY, AGED 26 YEARS, MOONKILMADA KALAM, GOPALAPURAM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 4. MURALI, S/O. MAYILSWAMY, AGED 28 YEARS, MOONKILMADA KALAM, GOPALAPURAM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT ----------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY S.I. OF POLICE, KOZHINJAMPARA POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------------- Bail Application No.1795 of 2011 ------------------------------- DATED: 04.03.2011 O R D E R Petitioners, who are accused in C.C.No.192/2007 on the file of the J.F.C.M, Chittur, seek anticipatory bail. 2. Admittedly, non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioners. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioners should not surrender before the Magistrate and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioners surrender before the Magistrate and file an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same day on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioners and also after considering the explanation offered by the petitioners for their previous non-appearance. With the above observation this application is disposed of . Dated this the 4th day of March, 2011. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. sj