IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2011 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 15911 of 2010(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SHYLAJAN, S/O. CHELLAPPAN, AGED 33 YEARS MANAGER OF MARATTUKULAM FARM, RESIDING AT KATTITHARA (KARTHIKA), KODAMTHURUTH MURI OF KODAMTHURUTHU VILLAGE, KUTHIYATHODU.P.O. CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.T.JAYAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. DY. S.P. OF POLICE, OFFICE OF . THE DY.S.P., CHERTHALA.P.O.,CHERTHALA. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLICE STATION, KUTHYATHODU, KUTHIYATHODU.P.O. CHERTHALA. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUTHIYATHODU POLICE STATION, KUTHIYATHODU.P.O. CHERTHALA. 4. KERALA STATE KARSHAKA THOZHILALI UNION AROOR AREA COMMITTEE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY C.T.VASU, THURAVOOR.P.O., CHERTHALA. 5. RAVEENDRAN, S/O. CHEERAN, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, AMRITAKSHARA BHAVAN, KODAMTHURUTHU PANCHAYAT WARD NO. VII, KUTHIYATHODU.P.O. CHERTHALA. 6. SRENIVASAN, S/O. CHEERAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, KUNNAPPALLY PADINJARE NIKARTH, KODAMTHURUTHU PANCHAYAT WARD NO. VII, KUTHIYATHODU.P.O., CHERTHALA. 7. VIJAYAN, S/O. VASU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS EDASSERI KODAMTHURUTHU PANCHAYAT WARD NO. VII, KUTHIYATHODU.P.O., CHERTHALA. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JAIBY PAUL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 15911 of 2010(L) ------------------------------------- EXT.P1. COPY OF THE NOTICE PUBLISHED AND CIRCULATED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT BEARING DATE 14.5.2010. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 20.5.2010 LODGED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE 2D AND 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPODENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL --------------------------------------- / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- WPC No.15911 of 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd March, 2011 JUDGMENT Basant, J. This writ petition filed as early as on 24.5.2010 remains without disposal even now. When the matter came up for admission on 25/5/2010, the case was posted to 28.5.2010 and interim orders were issued. Respondents have served. But, there is no appearance for them. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the interim order dated 28.5.2010, the apprehended danger is not there now. The petitioner may be given the option to complain to the police if there is any future threat from the party respondents. 3. This writ petition is in these circumstances dismissed, but we make it clear that the dismissal of this writ petition will not fetter the rights of the petitioner to complain to the police, if there be any future threat from respondents 4 to 7. R.BASANT JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE css/