1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O. No.1347/2010 in M.C.A. St. No.16319/2010 in Writ Petition No.375/2001 (D) ( The Manager, Marathwada Prestress Pvt. Ltd. ..Vs.. Shri Lalbahadur Yadav & another ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms Anjali Joshi, Adv. for applicant. Mr. D. Duvvuri, Adv. for respondent no.1. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & A.P. BHANGALE JJ. DATE : 1 4.2. 2011 . Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the respondent no.1. Civil Application No.1347/2010 is moved by the applicant for condonation of delay of 830 days in filing the miscellaneous civil application for restoration of the writ petition. The learned counsel for the applicant states that in the civil application the reason for inordinate delay has been mentioned. It is, therefore, contended that in view of the reason given in the civil application, the delay may be condoned. The learned counsel for the respondent no.1 has opposed the civil application on the ground that the delay is 2 inordinate and not properly explained. Considered the rival contentions canvassed by the learned counsel for the parties. In our view, the reason given for the inordinate delay caused by the applicant in filing the civil application for restoration of the writ petition is wholly inadequate to justify the same. In this view of the matter, civil application is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE Tambaskar.