IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6311 of 2011 1. MAHESH SINGH @ RAMU SINGH SON OF DEVILAL SINGH. 2. KAMLESH SAH SON OF FULO SAH. ------------ PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 28.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 379, 411 and 278/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. Since, the petitioner no.2 has been arrested, his application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous. So far as petitioner no.1 is concerned. It is alleged that from the hut of the petitioner, the people were found taking out the K. oil from a Tanklory. It is submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners that no shortage was found by the Tanklory owner nor the petitioner was found at the spot. Moreover, the petitioner does not claim the 2 hut, in question. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner no.1, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Tajpur (Bangra) P.S. Case No. 339/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)