1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW PETITION STAMP NO.6763 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5901 OF 1995 Divisional Controller, APPLICANT VERSUS Syed Mushtaq S/o.Syed Latif and others RESPONDENTS Mr.D.S.Bagul, learned counsel for the applicant. Mr.V.B.Ghatge, learned AGP for respondent no.3 Mr.G.K.Kshirsagar, learned counsel for respondent no.1 (CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.) DATE : 04/09/2009 PER COURT : 1. Since we have condoned the delay in filing this review application, this review application is heard though it is not on board with the consent of learned counsels for the parties. Since this application is not registered, we direct the Registry to register this application. 2. We have heard Shri.Bagul, learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsels for the respondents. With the assistance of 2 learned counsels for the parties, we have perused the documents and the findings recorded by the Division Bench in its judgment of which review is sought for. The learned counsel for the applicant has argued in support of the various grounds urged in the review application. Upon hearing the learned counsels for the parties, we do not find any merit in this application. Consequently this application fails and is therefore dismissed with no order as to costs. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) (P.V.HARDAS, J.) khs/SEP 2009/rast6763-09 3