1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.08.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P(MD)No.9353 of 2011 P.Samraj .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Assistant Director, Khadhi and Village Industries, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2.Circle Head, Regional Chairman and General Manager, Rural Banking Section, Circle Office, Indian Bank, Tirunelveli. 3.The Branch Manager, Indian Bank, Kaliyakkavilai, Kanyakumari District. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to take immediate action to waive the agriculture(beehives) loan taken by the petitioner, based on the letter of the second respondent, dated 03.12.2008 and 04.01.2010 and hereby waive the agriculture loan taken by the petitioner and return the original property document No.149 of 2003. For Petitioner : No Appearance For R-1 : Mr.M.Govindan, Special Govt. Pleader For R-2 and R-3 : Notice is dispensed with O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the third respondent to take immediate action to waive the agriculture(beehives) loan taken by the petitioner, based on the letter of the second respondent, dated 03.12.2008 and 04.01.2010 and to return the original property document No.149 of 2003 to the petitioner. 2. At the time of hearing, no representation on the side of the petitioner and Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for R-1. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. In view of the order which is going to be passed, notice is dispensed with for R-2 and R-3. 4. The petitioner has made a representation to the third respondent on 04.02.2011 for waiving the agriculture loan taken by the petitioner. Since the grievance of the petitioner has not been considered so far, the petitioner has come forward with this petition. 5. Without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the third respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 04.02.2011, on its own merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned is free to deal with the matter on its merits as per law. 6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No Costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (writs) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The Assistant Director, Khadhi and Village Industries, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2.Circle Head, Regional Chairman and General Manager, Rural Banking Section, Circle Office, Indian Bank, Tirunelveli. 3.The Branch Manager, Indian Bank, Kaliyakkavilai, Kanyakumari District. +one cc to Special Government Pleader, Sr.No. 28538 W.P.(MD)No.9353 of 2011 19.08.2011 pm SMA/07.9.2011/5C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/