1 dgm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7409 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.P.P.Goyal for the petitioner. Mr.G.S.Godbole i/by Mr.S.S.Kanetkar for respondent no.1. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED : 18.11.2008 P.C. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order whereby the court has kept the issue to be decided along with other points, the petitioner/ defendant no.8’s application to dismiss the suit for want of jurisdiction. The trial is already commenced & is at concluding stage. Earlier such application was already rejected. The object is to delay and prolong the matter. In view of this, the objection so raised as rightly considered by the court by reasoned order. There is no perversity. The impugned order is within the frame work of law and the record. The petition is dismissed accordingly. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.]