1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.756 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 9TH FEBRUARY, 2010. 1. The grievance made in this Petition is that the advertisement to invite applications to fill up the various posts in Respondent No.2 department, was issued selectively in Mumbai and Pune. According to the Petitioner, this has caused discrimination and is violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. 2. This argument does not commend to us. 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders We can understand if there was express rule or regulation requiring issuance of advertisement in every District of Maharashtra. No such provision has been brought to our notice. Publication issued in the newspaper having wide circulation in Pune and Mumbai is substantial compliance of the requirement of public notice. More over the learned A.G.P. for the Respondents has brought to our notice that the advertisement was duly displayed on the Web-site of the Respondents "http://oasis.mkcl.org/cpd". 3. The fact that such publication was done through Web-site as is noted in the brochure at Page 15 of the paper book, is not in dispute at all. 4. Considering the above, We find no 3 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders merits in this Petition and the same is dismissed. [S.S. SHINDE,J.] [A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.] asb/FEB10/wp756.10