IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5282 of 2008 AMIT KUMAR @ RAIMMI @ REMI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 5.5.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner’s prayer for bail in a case under sections 395, 3976 and 120B of the Penal Code read with section 25 (1-B)A, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act and sections ¾ of the explosives Substance Act was rejected on 13.8.2007. The allegation is that some persons including this petitioner allegedly looted cash of Rs.50 lakhs from U.T.I. Bank which was being transported by a van to another bank situated in Mahatma Gandhi Nagar. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a supplementary affidavit today in which it has been stated that the trial has commenced and nine witnesses have been examined including the informant. The depositions are annexed with the supplementary affidavit. All the witnesses have been declared hostile and the informant, PW 9 has not identified the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid affidavit, the petitioner Amit Kumar @ Raimmi @ Remi is directed to be released on bail in S.T. No. 245/2007 arising out of Sultanganj (Agam Kuan) PS Case No. 318/2006 on furnishing bail bond of rupees ten thousand with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl.District & Sessions Judge V, Patna with the conditions that the petitioner should attend the trial on each and every date as required by the court and if he is absent even for a single date without cause, his bail bond shall be cancelled. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)