IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4701 of 2010 ANIRUDH RAI Versus PARAS SINGH & ORS. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Abhinay Raj, Advocate ----- 2 16.03.2011 Heard Mr. Abhinay Raj, learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears on behalf of the opposite parties. Present application has been filed by the petitioner for modification of order dated 22.9.2010 passed in M.J.C. No. 3500 of 2010, whereby aforesaid M.J.C. No. 3500 of 2010 has been allowed and the civil revision was restored as against opposite party nos. 3, 4 and 7 to 11 and 13. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that civil revision was also dismissed as against opposite party no. 6 and this fact was brought on record in paragraph no. 2 of the aforesaid M.J.C. No. 3500 of 2010 and the substitution petition has already been filed on 10.8.2010. Thus, aforesaid M.J.C. No. 3500 of 2010 was though allowed as against opposite party no. 6 also but that does not - 2 - seem to be reflected in the order. I find force in the submission raised on behalf of the petitioner. The prayer was also for restoration of application against the opposite party no. 6, the same stand reflected from paragraph no. 2 of the aforesaid application as well as orders dated 1.4.2010 passed by the Lawazima Board, in the order dated 19.5.2010 and office note dated 13.8.2010. In above view of the matter, let the aforesaid order dated 22.9.2010 be deemed to have been passed with respect to opposite party no. 6 also. Accordingly this application stands allowed and the order dated 22.9.2010 stands modified to the extent as indicated above. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)