1 caf258-09 rpa FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 258 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1115 OF 2005 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Mr. Balkrishna D. Joshi for the applicants. Mr. Rohan Surve i/b. Mr. Sachindra B. Shetye for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : JUNE 24, 2011. P.C.: The learned counsel appearing for the applicants on instructions of the applicants states that the applicants are in possession of the flats in question. 2. In view of this statement, prayers (a) and (b) directing the first respondent to pay proportionate share in Municipal Taxes and maintenance charges cannot be granted. As far as prayer (c) is 2 caf258-09 concerned, considering the controversy involved in the Appeal and the nature of the decree passed, said prayer cannot be granted at this stage. 3. Hence, application is rejected by keeping all questions on merits of the Appeal open. (A.S.OKA, J.)