WPSS No. 91 of 2008 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard Sri Rakesh Thapliyal and Sri Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel, for the respondents. I have perused the affidavit, counter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit filed on behalf of the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that one Harish Chandra Dimri, who had less quality point has been given admission in Special B.T.C. course as against the petitioner, who is having more quality point. Learned counsel for the parties are agreed that this writ petition may be disposed of directing the authorities concerned to decide the representation dated 08.01.2008 (copy Annexure 7 to the writ petition). Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that respondent no. 3 (Principal, District Education and Training Institute) shall dispose of the representation dated 08.01.2008, made by the petitioner, within a period of two weeks from the date certified copy of this order is produced before said authority. The respondent no. 3 shall make an effort to decide the representation before the counseling for the admission is over. (Stay Application No. 285 of 2008, also stands disposed of). (P.C.P.,J.) 12.06.2008 NS