6 C?^-i ^•-"" -:.--r?s^'-i^.....--" '<^^%.^--""" ^^vW^\y'"" ?<t6S ,&-••••"" ^' IN THE HONLBLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. CHHATTISGARH at BILASPUR • ?•' p 01 l/ui-p- 22-3^ /a-f, --".ii. ^Ci 'f PETITIONER Shyam Babu Sahu S/o Late Shri. Chainsingh Sahu Aged about 65 Years, Retired Driver, M.P.State Road Transport Corpn. BILASPUR Residing at - C/o Shri. G.P.Naidu, House No. 8/46, Rajendra Nagar, BILASPUR-495001 (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^' 3. State of Chhattisgarh Throueh: The Divisional Manager, Chhattisgarh Infrastructral - Development Corporation, G.E.Road, RAIPUR The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Infi-astmctral - Development Corporation, G.E.Road, RAIPUR The Divisional Manager, Chhattisgarh Infrastmctral Development Corporation, BILASPURCCG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE :ONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ^PROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE < CERTIORARY. MANDAMUS ETC', Writ Petition No.3236 of 2006 Soma :.^ -6 /^ Mr. B.P. Rao, counsei for- the petitioner. Heard on admission. The main grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is that the petitioner is not beiry pdd retir'al benefits. The case of the petitioner is that he was working as Driver in AA.P.S.R.T.C. since 1972 and he retired from the service on 24-2-1997, th&refore, he is entitied for Provident Fund, Sratuity, Security Deposits, Pension etc., for- which he submitted et representation on 26-5-1997. In the year 2005 atso i.e. on 7-2-2005 he msde a cspresentation, but no dues are being paid to him. On cccount of absence, the petitioner' was removed from the service which was challenged before the Labour Court, Bilaspur and the Lobour Court, Bilaspur a!lowed the c!aim of the petitioner herein with 75% back wagea, same was upheld by the Industrial Tribunal in the oppesl fiied by the respondents vide order dated 16-12-2034. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that therefore, the respondents be directed to decide the representotion of the petitionef for providing retirai benefits of the petitioner. 1-iaving heard learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the petition, the prayer made by lecrned counse! for the petitioner appear-s to be just, fair and reasonable. Therefore, without expressing ony opinion on merits of the case, the respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner after considering his case, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law. With the direction aforesaid, fhe petition stands disposed of. Parties are entitied for certified copy of this order. Sd/- i L-G-Bbadoo