r Gov/ri OF_CHHATTISOARH_LB8!.ASPUR. PETITiONER DEFENDANT-4 WR.tT PETjTSON N0. 2623 OF 2004 1. Anij Kumar Chandrakar, S/o Ganga Prasad Chandrakar, MIG-1-853, Amdinagar, HUDCO, Bhllai, Dlstt. Durg (Chhattisgarh). Partner: M/s Kamai Enterprises. 2. Ganga Prasad Chandrakar, S/o Siya Ram Chandrakar, R/o MIG-1/853, Amdinagar, HUDCO, Bhllai, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh). Versu® 1. Bank of Maharastra, Branch Office, Shanichari P.0. & Distt. Durg (Chhattlsgarh). 2. Avinash Verma, S/o SucShakar Verma, MIG-289, Padmanabhpur, P.0. & Distt. Durg (CG), partner of M/s Kamaj Enterprises. 3. Mfe Kamal Enterprises, Registered Partnership Firm, Shop No.3, HUDCO, B-Market, Amdlnagar, P.0. BhiSai, District Durg (CG). 4. Shri K.V. Kashyap, IXth Additional District Judge, P.0. & Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh). CWrit petition under Articie 226/227 of the Constitution of india) SingleBench: Hon'bte Shri K. Agnihotrl, J. : Shri B.R. Ghosh, counsej for the petitioner. Shri ASok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for the State. RESPGNDENT PLASNTIFF DEFENDANT-2 RESPONDENT DEFENDANT-1 ORAL (Passed on thls 4th day of September, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on Instructions, submits that with the passage oftime the petltion has become Infructuous. 2) Accordingly, the writ petition is cllsmissed as having become infructuous. 3) Consequentiy, pending appiications. if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge