. ,,..'ili'ln;;--...,. Xf.^ ';sfcal3GS!% .^.'L-ft.i^' !37] Proposed Applicant (Plamtiffl 1) 2) Mahesb Dubey, aged about 45 years, S/o late Prayag Prasad Dubey, Caste Bramhan, R/o Gondpara, Bilaspur, Tab.sU and District Bilaspur (C.G.). Rambai, W/o late Lakhan Lal, aged about 70 years, R/o ViUage a»inen, Takhatpus District Bflaspur (C.G.). Pradunuia Paudey, aged about 43 years, s/o B.P. Pandey, Caste Bi-amhan, Occupation, ClUtivation, R/o 27 miou, BUaspur, TahsU aad District Bilaspur(C.G.). Aaup Tiwari, aged about 32 years, S/o Sahebram. Tiwari, Caste Bramhan, Occupation Business, R/o Shastrmagar, BaaKaii Para, New Sarkanda, BUaspur, Tahsil and District 4). BUaspur (C.G.S, 5) 6) 7S Raniesh Kuniar Dubey, aged about 50 years, S/o Sudarshaa Prasad Dubey, Caste Bramhan, "inrs ^p'rvir'p R/n iT-P '^^"jr'^"-^-"- ^^^''-^<-, i^/^ ^,.. . Viliar Colony, Mangla Road, Bilaspur, (C.G.). Kaustulya Bai, D/o Parasuram, Aged about 75 years, Caste Sattiami, R/o VUlage Sakan, Tahsil Takhatpiir, Bilaspur(C.G.). State of Chliatusgrh CoUector, Bilaspur (C.G.). Anand Dehaokar, aged about 48 years, S./o Shri T.D. Dehaukar, R/o Chaatapara, Tahsil Bilaspiir, Distdct Biiaspur (C.G.). District through (SB :Hon'bie Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.l Present:- Shri Ram Kuia.ar Tiwari, Advocate for fh.e petitioner. • Shri K.K. SinRh, Advocate witli Shri Bliarat Rajput, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Shri Suiuit Jhauwar, P.L. forthe State/respondent No. 6. None for the respondents No. 2 to 5 &7. ;« -^- fpnacpd nn 13/ftQ/oni 11 ^ wy^CT^/^a »»** ^*^ l •*^^'f <—i^/^^^ 1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India petitioner has chaUenged the legality and propriety of fhe order dated 4/12/2010 passed by F'irst Additional District Judge, Bilaspur (C.G.) ia civil suit No. 45-A/07 whereby application filed iinder Order 1 Rule 10 read witli Section 151 ofthe Code of Civii Procedure, 1908 by the petitioner has been disiuissed. 2. Shri Ram. Kuniar Tiwari, Advocate tbr fhe petitioner, Shri. K.K. Siugh, Advocate with Shri Bharat Rajput, Advocate for flie respondent No. 1 aad Shri Suinit Jhanwar, P.L. for the State/respondent No. 6 are heard. 3. Order impugned, copy of the plaiat, copy of the application and copy ofthe issues framed are perused. 4. Court cannot coiupel to fhe plaintiff to inuplead or uiake a person as a party agaiast wishes of the party' but ia case of non-jouider of necessar;r party, Court is conipetent to dismiss the suit. In fhe present case, on tbe basis ofpleading Court has fraiued issue No. 3 which reads as foUows:- "3- TOT ^.ST <ni?I^T ^ft ^ ^WcT TlTFTOur |^ ^ if^r ff Plk4lRd tTPTT -rm ^TTX qiT^' W ^ ysir ^ S^ •y? 5. Alfhough, without itapleading legal representatives of deceased Prayagraj Dubey, any finding on a&resaid issue would not be legally possible but considering the claiia of fhe plamtiff/respondent No. 1 fhat they wUl not implead petitioner as party, petition is stands disposed ofwith the foUowing observation that:- Court shall provide opportynity to amend the plaiat relatinf to deletion ofpleading relatuig to Prayagraj Dubey and transaction with Prayagraj Dubey and ftiereafter proceed to decide suit. ilNt'WBB ,!y s- :^slS8Slk 6. Wifhout providiag opportunity of heariag to fhe petitioner, aay order or finduig upon any issue agaiast such person would not be legally possible. If petitioner is not made as party then judgment aad decree passed ia suit shall not be binding upon petitioner. No order as to costs. Interiin application staads disposed of. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge