IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH MAY 2008 / 7TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 10806 of 2008(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SIDDIQUAL AKBAR, MUBARAK MANZIL, VANDIPERIYAR. BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENTS: ------------- REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY IDUKKI, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY IDUKKI. BY Government Pleader MR.K.V.MANOJKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC.10806/08 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR TP DT.3.10.2007 EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE FIELD OFFICER'S REPORT DT.14.11.2007 EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE RESPONDENT DT.5.2.2008 TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W.P.(C) No. 10806 of 2008-J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 28th day of May, 2008 J U D G M E N T What is sought for in this writ petition filed by the petitioner is a direction to the respondent for the consideration of Ext.P1 application for temporary permit made on 03/10/2007. 2. According to the petitioner, though the matter was brought up for consideration of the respondent, it is getting indefinitely adjourned. Petitioner further submits that on receipt of Ext.P1 application, respondent called for a report from the concerned field officer, and the said report, Ext.P2, was submitted on 14/11/2007. Thereafter, as per Ext.P3 proceedings, the Regional Transport Authority has adjourned the matter calling for the details of the route from other districts of Kottayam and Pathanamthitta. It is contended that Ext.P2 report covered that districts as well. The additional report called for as per Ext.P3 has not been received by R.T.A so far. In these circumstances, petitioner has filed this writ petition, seeking fixation of a time frame for receipt of the additional report and for expeditious consideration of Ext.P1 application. W.P.(C).No.10806/2008-J -: 2 :- 3. In the facts of this case, it may not be proper to set any definite time frame for passing orders on the application. In view of the above, if report as called for in Ext.P3 is not received, R.T.A will take steps for the expeditious receipt of the report and on receipt of the same Ext.P1 application shall be considered without further delay. The writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge ms