THE HON'BLE SRI BILAL NAZKI, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 2010 of 2005 Date:19-10-2005 Between: A.Suryanarayana Reddy ..Appellant And The Chief Engineer and others ..Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI BILAL NAZKI, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 2010 of 2005 J U D G M E N T (Per the Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, ACJ): Heard learned counsel for the parties. The only ground agitated before the learned Single Judge was that the authorities have taken the working hours as’9’ instead of ‘6’. The learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition reducing the amounts on the basis of this argument. Now, this writ appeal has been filed altogether on a different argument that the penalty amount could be imposed at the rate of Rs.6/- per unit and not at the rate of Rs.9/- per unit. This was never the case of the writ petitioner/appellant before the writ Court and a new case is tried to be projected in this appeal. As such, the writ appeal is not maintainable and the same is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. _____________________ (Bilal Nazki, ACJ) 19th October, 2005 ___________________ (R.Subhash Reddy,J) vrn