IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5808 of 2011 Date of decision: September 21, 2011. Smt. Mohinder Kaur & Another ... Petitioner v. Amarjeet Singh ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Shri Randeep Singh Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia , J. (Oral): Present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying that the order dated 31.5.2011 (Annexure P-1) passed by the court of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Khanna, whereby evidence of the defendants was closed, be set aside. Shri Randeep Singh Rana, Counsel for the petitioner- defendants, has stated at the Bar that after the evidence of the defendants was closed, plaintiff had led no evidence in rebuttal and now the case is fixed for arguments. Counsel states that one opportunity be granted to the defendants to examine defendant – Mohinder Kaur and one official from the revenue department to fortify the case of the defendants. After hearing Counsel for the petitioners, this Court is of the view that balance equities and fair play demand that one opportunity should be granted to petitioner No.1 to step into the witness box herself and examine an official of the revenue department. Counsel says that both the witnesses shall be examined by the petitioner at her own risk and responsibility. Accordingly, the present petition is accepted and the impugned order dated 31.5.2011 is set aside. The trial court is directed to proceed in the matter in view of the observations made above, subject to payment of costs of Rs.3,000/-. [Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia] September 21, 2011. Judge kadyan