#39 16.12.2010 Present: Mr.Harpreet Singh & Mr. Rajash Gupta, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. R.N. Vats, APP for the State Mr. P.K. Mishra, Adv. for the connplainant with complainant in person +Crl.M.A No. 181624/2010 in CrI.M.C. No. 3898/2010 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CrI.M.C. No. 3898/2010 This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.188/2009 registered at P.S. Paschim Vihar under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC on the complaint of respondent No.2 Reason for seeking quashing of the FIR is that the FIR was the result of a matrimonial discord between the parties which has been amicably settled and now there is no dispute left between the parties. Petitioners No.l, 3 to 5 are identified by Shri Harpreet Singh, Advocate who states at Bar that he has instructions from petitioner No.2 to make statement oh his behalf. Respondent No.2 is identified by her counsel Shri P.K. Mishra. Signing Date:05.08.2024 16:58:50 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Parties confirm tliat they have amicably settled the matter and the terms of settlement are contained in the copy of the memorandum of settlement, which has been placed on record as annexure-P-2. It is stated by the parties that original memorandum of settlement was signed by them and pursuant to the settlement arrived at between the parties mutual consent divorce has already been granted. Respondent No.2 submits that she has settled the matter with the petitioners of her own without any inducement or threat from any corner. As per the settlement the petitioners agreed to pay her a sum of ? 16.5 lakhs in full and final settlement, out of which she has already received ^ 13 lakhs and balance ^ 3.5 lakhs is paid to her today in Court vide bank draft No.002585 dated 7.12.2010 drawn on HDFC Bank. Respondent No.2 further submits that she was given a cheque bearing No.765474 drawn at Oriental Bank of Commerce for ?3.5 lakhs as a security which she has returned back to the counsel for the petitioners. Respondent No.2 states that now there is no dispute left between the parties and that she does not want any action against either of the petitioners and that she has no objection if the FIR No.188/2009 registered witli P.S. Paschim Viliar and tine proceedings arising out tlie same are quaslied. Mr. R.N. Vats, learned APR for the State submits that since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement, there is no purpose of continuing with the investigation of the case and the State has no objection to the quashing of the FIR and the proceedings arising out of the same. Since the parties have arrived at a settlement and now there is no dispute left, no useful purpose will be served in l<eeping the matter alive and prosecuting the petitioners. Accordingly FIR No.188/2009 registered at P.S. Paschim Vihar, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPG and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Parties shall be bound by the terms of settlement. Petition stands disposed of. Order dasti. (AJIT BHARIHOKE) JUDGE DECEMBER 16, 2010 aj