KBP 2577-09.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2577 OF 2009 Maharudrappa Madivalappa Konapure ..Petitioner Vs. Rajgopal Ramrakh Zanwar ..Respondent ......... Mr.P.M.Pradhan with Mr.Shrishail Sakhare, for petitioner. Mr.Nitin Jamdar, for respondent. ......... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J.. DATE : 31 th August, 2009. P.C. : 1] The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions of the petitioner, states that till the disposal of the suit the petitioner will not part with the possession of the suit premises and will not create any third party rights therein. 2] The learned counsel appearing for the respondent original plaintiff states that the amendment was required to be applied for as the respondent had learnt that the petitioner was trying to part with the possession of the suit premises and was trying to create third party interests in respect of the suit premises. He states that in view of the aforesaid statement of the petitioner made before this Court, now the amendment is not necessary. Hence, the order: (a) The statement made by the petitioner through his counsel is accepted. KBP 2577-09.sxw 2 (b) In view of the statement, it is not necessary to carry out amendment. Hence, the impugned order dated 2 nd February, 2009 is quashed and set aside. The application for amendment stands disposed of. ( A.S.OKA, J. )