T p 1 c^^° HON'BLE D.B. IN THEHON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fHABEAS CORPUSlNo. 3fc^3> / 2011 PETITIONERS: ^>^^y /^"p" RESPONDENTS: 1. Pasel Netam, S/o Shri Mangtu Netam, Aged about 50 years, R/o Village Tumriwal, Post Mardapal, Tehsil Kohdagaon, District Bastar, C.G. Laikhan Korram, S/o Shri Birju Ram Korram, Aged about 51 years, R/o Aadnar Khaspara, Village Aadnar, Post Chema, ^ Tehsil Kondagaon, District Bastar, C.G. VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Home, Ministry, D.K.S. Building, Raipur, C.G. 2. ^ The Superintendent of Police, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, C.G. 3. Station House Officer, Police Station Kondagaon, District Bastar, C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF HABEAS CORPUS ^ ••'f^iS,., "^k."'%. i~: '. ^,n!--S 1^ g V^.{ i^ i'W "-r^^ tc) HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR '.~>. PETmONERS RESPONDENTS WRTT PETmON (HQ N0.3643 of2011 Pasel Netam & Aaother. VERSUS State ofChh^tisgaA & Otfaers. °V-J*' WRIT PETmON UNDER ARnCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITOTION OF j Coram: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri & Hon'ble Shri Radhe Shyam Sharma, JJ. Present: Shri Alok Dewan^m, Advocate far the petitioner. Shri U.N.S.Deo, Goveronwnt Advoeate forthe State/respondeirts. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 11th day ofJuly, 2011) 1. Leamed ccwuisel aiyearing for the petitioner subuats that in vfew of the statement submitted by Shri U.N.S.Deo, lesuned Govemment Advocate for the State/respondents, thM RamAar son ofpetitioner No. l was an-^ted by Police Mardqwl for the offence under section 25 and 27 offlie Anns Act in comiection wifh crime No. 12/11 on 7.7.2011. Jamdhar, brother ofrespondent No. was also arrested on 08.07.2011 in connection wifh crime No. 26^2008 forfhe offences punishable under section 147,148,149, 307 ofthe Indian Penal Code, and 25/27 ofthe Anns Act, 23, 38(2), 39(2) of flie Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and in CTime No. 30/08 for the offences pumshable under section 147, 148, 307 of the I.P.C. and 25, 27 ofthe Anns Act, 3, 5 ofthe Explosives Act, 1884 and 23, 38(2), 39(2) ofthe Unlavsrful ActivMes (Prevention) Act, 1967, Both of them were produced before the Court of J.M.F.C. Kondagaon and thereafter, tfaey were sent to Jagdalpur jail. Thus, fhis petition has become infinctuous and prays fw withdrawal offhe writ petition. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, tiie writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. _^-.— Sd/- . SIWAM SHABMA SatishK.Agnihotri ; Judge i