1 W.P.No.5221.10 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5221 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Petitioners v/s Shri Harischandra Vaji Bachav ... Respondent Mr.P.G.Sawant, “B” Panel counsel for the petitioners. Mr.M.B.Gawade for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 12TH OCTOBER, 2010 P.C.: 1. The petition has been filed against the order of the Industrial Court dated 15.7.2009. By this order, the Industrial Court has allowed the complaint filed by the respondent alleging that the petitioner had committed unfair labour practices under Items 5, 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of the M.R.T.U. & P.U.L.P. Act, 1971. The Industrial Court therefore directed the petitioner to give a deemed date of appointment as a driver to the respondent and all the benefits of permanency from 1.11.1989 till 29.9.2003. The 2 W.P.No.5221.10 Industrial Court has found, on the basis of the evidence led before it, that the respondent was asked to work as an oilman-cum-driver driver from 21.2.1988 and that he has been working as a driver from that date. In these circumstances, the Industrial Court has held that the wages payable to a driver must be paid to the respondent with effect from date on which he was asked to work as a driver. 2. In my opinion, no error has been committed by the Industrial Court. 3. The writ petition stands rejected. ..... 3 W.P.No.5221.10