Sin ka gench w v C® IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. NO. 4—438 /2004 PETITIONER 2 if” DPENDRA KUMAR DESHLAHRE Q S/o Shri Manrakhan Lal Deslahre, agsd about 43 Years occupation — Assistant Teacher Middle school Bhalera Block-Aarang I District Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS ” x 1. The State of CG. Through the Secretary of Department of School Education RESPONDENTS D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector Raipur(C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Raipur 4. Deputy Director Education Department Raipur(C.G.) T PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI ETC OR ANY OTHER DIRCTIONS OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER “ / 3aWWW“ Fi" WWf$ ¢ I W \“iTiK n ,l 3g 1Q§§ 2 Smt. Kochar, counsel Shri Yashwant Singh, Application for urgent Heaxd, Leamed counsel for matter relates to transfer o: that for the piesent the petitioner may be given an opportunity sentation before the competent t which shall be considered on its thlaw 1 Without expressmg any opinion the opinion of this Court, ends of ection is given to the petitioner to ion raising his grievances before he respondents along with a copy the competent authority of the respondents shall decide tlhe same on its own merits in ‘ accordance with law as. early months from the date of rece of ming a detailed repre authority of the ’mspondents own melits in accordance w1 Having considered ant on the merits of the case, in justice will be served if a dil make a detailed re'presenta1 the competent authority of t of the petition and this ordier, Within 15 days, and on such representation being med, for the petitioner. Govt. Advocate, for the State hearing is allowed. the petitioner submits that the E'the petitioner. He also submits as possible preferably within two ipt of the iepiesentau'on. GRI {J FS/JJO 12/2000—50,000, atr” azié‘w rm; (Wu) WWWWW a‘Wzfm Wig? if f???W § 15J 1212004 XI-HC 78 Ww W2? (13f:{a§a) 72m“76$§ @Légwg Wkm . i 37%itanfm ‘ wmmm mm£me Wwaawi’m H 2, l $WW etitioner submits that the petitioner has not been relieved. He prays that the pe11'tioner ‘may be allowed to It is directed that if the pe ‘u'oner has not been relieved and other person has not joined warned counsel for the continue. place of the petitioner, the petitiongr may be allowed to con ue‘ h'll the representation is decided. It is made clear that if e petitioner has already been relieved or other person has alrieady joined in place of the petitioner, this order will not entigtle the petitioner to rejoin at a l With the aforesaid observiation, this petition stands disposed of. M.W.P.No. No.8942/ 2004 also stand dispose of. Certified copy as per riiles. i the earlier place of posting. i I 4783/2004 and LA. Consequently, Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge