IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19938 of 2010 NAKUL SAW Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.06.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Kasma P.S. Case No.22 of 2010 for offence punishable under Section 47(A) of the Excise Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to the statement of allegation as set out in the F.I.R, submits that the informant who is a Sub-Inspector of Police, himself has taken note of the statement of the petitioner that the seized excise goods were for the purpose of celebration in the family of one Harendra Prasad Gupta. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the antecedent of the petitioner is clean and he has never been involved in any other criminal case. He further submits that no case under Section 47 A is made out against the petitioner who is an individual and not a company. 2 Having regard to the submissions aforesaid, let the petitioner namely, Nakul Saw be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Kasma P.S. Case No. 22 of 2010. Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)