1 WP 9170/10 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9170 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. S.D. Patil for the petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 13TH JANUARY 2011 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner challenges the order of the trial Court directing restoration of water supply to the existing toilet. No exception can be taken to the aforesaid order. Hence, the writ petition is rejected summarily. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no objection for the tenant constructing another toilet at his 2 WP 9170/10 own cost and that statement has been recorded in the order dated 2nd December 2010. By requiring the tenant to construct another toilet and obtain water supply at his own cost, the petitioner cannot deny his obligation of tenantable repairs. Hence, that cannot be a ground for admission of the writ petition. The writ petition is rejected summarily. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)