1 wp-2303-10.sxw dgm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2303 OF 2010 Ramjanam Govind Yadav .... Petitioner vs The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent None for the petitioner. Mr.D.P. Adsule, APP for the State. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 10th August, 2010 P.C.: This is a petition received from the Jail. By the order dated 1.8.2009 the petitioner was granted furlough leave and he was expected to avail the said leave before 1.12.2009 (within a period of four months). The said period was extended and finally by the order dated 29/30th March, 2010 he was informed that the period to avail the furlough leave could not be extended any further and he was called upon to submit a fresh application for furlough leave. Hence, this petition. 2 The only ground raised by the petitioner is the likely delay to avail furlough leave if a fresh application was required to be submitted for the same. In any case, the petitioner has already lost more than four months and it cannot be presumed that this petition would be decided within a limited period. It would be, therefore, in the interest of the petitioner that he submits a fresh application 2 wp-2303-10.sxw for furlough leave. 3 In case he submits a fresh application, we direct that the same be decided within a period of 45 days as has been directed by this court in the earlier orders and the petition is disposed accordingly. 4 Let a copy of this order be communicated to the petitioner at his present Jail address, through the Superintendent of the same Jail. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) ( B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)