IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND TEN WRIT PETITION No.4521 of 2010 Between: T.V.V.Ramakrishna Rao. … Petitioner And: Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Bharath Bhavan 1 to 4 & 6, Curriumbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai-400 001 and others. … Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri P.V.A.Padmanabham. Counsel for the Respondents: Sri O.Manohar Reddy for R1 & R2. None for R.3. This Court made the following: ORDER:- The petitioner, who is one of the applicants for grant of license for LPG distributorship of the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited-respondent No.1, filed this Writ Petition, feeling aggrieved by non-disposal of his representation made to the Grievance/Complaint Redressal Committee constituted by respondent No.1. A perusal of the record shows that in his representation the petitioner raised objections regarding the proof of income, experience and other aspects of respondent No.3. According to the petitioner, respondent No.3 misled respondent No.1 by making misleading claims regarding his income, experience etc., on the basis of which respondent No.3 was placed at Serial No.1 in the rank list, while the petitioner was placed at Serial No.2. Under Guideline No.19 of the Selection Guidelines issued by respondent No.1, an applicant who appeared for the interview is entitled to send his complaint if he is aggrieved by the selection, and the said complaint will be examined by the oil company after notice to the complainant and thereafter decision on the complaint will be taken. In view of the above Guideline, it is not necessary for this Court to refer, in detail, to the allegations made by the petitioner as he has already brought the alleged irregularities, in the selection of respondent No.3, to the notice of respondent No.1. It will suffice if respondents 1 and 2 are directed to dispose of the petitioner’s representation/complaint in accordance with the above mentioned Guideline and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As the petitioner has raised a grievance that certain information asked by him has not been furnished by respondent No.2, he is permitted to represent to respondent No.2 in this regard within a period of two weeks from today. If the petitioner approaches respondent No.2 with an application for furnishing information relevant to the selection in question, respondent No.2 shall furnish the same to enable the petitioner to raise additional objections, if any, to the Corporation. Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:08-04-2010 MNR