@ m THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASBUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.NO.'S.-S' /200Z WMT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227_OF^ CONSTITUTION QF INDIA PETITIONERS x €^'^^.- .-''.•* -v^'i'y' ^^y^7 ^^^ * b.^ <<^> y > RESPQNDENTS 1. VmodSingh,aged38years S/o. Late Harihar Singh 2. SaileshKumarSmgh,aged35years S/o. Late Harihar Singh, Occupation Agriculture Smt. Lilavati, aged 50 years Wd/o. Late ShriNivas Singh Occupation house wife 4. Santosh Singh, aged about 20 years S/o. Late Shri Nivas Singh * ~" • ' . . •• 5. Pradeep Singh, aged 18 years S/o. Late Shri Nivas Singh Petitioner No.4 & 5 are Students 6. Smt.Nirmala Siagh, aged 45 years Wd/o. Late Shrikant Singh Occupation House wife 7. AvmashSmgh, aged 18 years, Occupation student 8. Rajan Singh, aged about 14 years Mmor through mother & Natural guardian Smt. Nirmla Singh AllK/o. Vill. Indarpur,P.O. Odagi P.S. Bhaiyathan,Tah. Surajpur, /bistt.Sarguja(C.G.) ' RSUS : 1. TheStateofChhattisgarh Through TheCollector, Ambikapiu-(C.G.) -^l //2// 2. The Sub-Divisional Officer Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) '3. Jai Smgh, S/o. Gajroop, Caste Gond 4. Belasiya, Wd/o. Gajroop, Caste Gond, No.3&4 R7o. Vill. Indrapur Tah. Surjpur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) •••'y: XI-HC-22 SD^I.^t R-ii* sn^r **1 ^^fl i^ f^i'fSSS-.^i'X'VSSGfSS-v'^li^^ ^•3 f.»i|t4td<!<^Emi'y'Ko, 1<st<l)Mli<.. WRTf ar(ili^» '. t^-s':.^.^^'^. ^200^ sii^r^raim^itei 31.01.2003 Shri S.K.Beriwal, counsel'fi Sbri Ranbir Sm.gh, G.A. ft^Ffhe petitioners. ' fi^r fhe State/RespGSilehtsNo.l and 2. !•• Though ttns inatter was IL! fhe short pouit uivolved ia this teamed couitselJfbri the petition^r State coTinsel, itis being dispose4 .Heard; jted for adismssion, <X)D.siderulg |wiit petition, on the piayer of aud with the -coQsent of the The.case/6f'tlJLe?p'e(j;t&igig:FS:!| oflate Slat, Gaaga'Devlwho had on 14.3.1967 withpermissiOu bf was-graiited ia Revenue Case NQ< all this, the petitioners assert, th( has filed au application under Se^ No.2 who has aUowed tlie appliee(tion be resfored to the original owner. According to the petitione| aa appeal was preferred by the ^ ,4)l^[d<ft'T *fl*i<^^'f?1!3^-<faf$!^' . .'^-sgPgH sii^r of at fhe admission. stage, ligjliKat'ftlfiy.arE the legal heirs Ipurchased the1aud|ln question pieCbUector, Aiilbikapur, wluch |49-A/21 of 1965-66. Ignoriag owner ofthe land in question j;tion 170 (B) bcfQre respondent and directed that property s, agatn.st fhe Qrder of S.D.O. etitioners before ftie CoUector, 11[':[T^1^Rg^ XI-HC-22 ^nt-'wm^ ^SS!^"3' WwenfsRWS s'w^s ~"T^t'-2W»'1 F%t. ^sl^Ri^i s^^^t'^i^a 'f^ (B Suiyija alongwifb. an appUcafion appeal hasvbeen eiiljertained, th^ rejectEd wtuch order 1s fhe subjed wrif petition, It is subinitted on bchalfof appeal has been adinitted, uiider of the case;, fhe respoiident No.l the application as dispossession to the Qri^inal owner wili iufructuous. Ha.viug heard leamed coyns^ State, the Cpurt is of fhe.optnion be served ia keepiug ftie writ petit| be disposed of by granting urtenm{ which fhe Gourt considers, onth^ tbe case, to be appropriate. stay passed by respoadent Noj Appeal No.ll/A-2&/2002-03 is sc| the opeiatioa of the orier dated '9-00<;fai/4 TTtT' ?lnT"t—T'^'it7t'<:*i/S-ytlal-iT~^4?fi/''><atf ^g •^^EHii stay. However, tb.ougb.the 1 stay applicatibn Uas been |inatter of challenged in. this |tie petitioners fhat suice the (he facts aud cu-GUinstaaces ^as not justified ui rejecting a^d restpration of ftie property v^FtuaIly ruake ftie appeal |I for the petitiQners and fhe tjiat uo useful purpose woiild t^)n penduig as fhe same can gprotection to fhe petitioncrs Bfacts and citcuaistarices of AcclonliD. anliD.gly, ftie order lefusiug 1-CoUector, Ambikapur ia asidc aud it 1s diTccted ffaat 19.11.2003 (Aiuicxure P/l) 'SiTrwa-IvtTi.-r'' i*TTt ' .I?<n'iit^"--rii1ijf=>l^l'ai:ol^:l XBH@-22 ^^''wwan, ^f;;%&B Dmfitiu<<t<*c 200 'fa.bt^' SM'STWI &K?taanS-n St>*ffift -3- Nt>.83/A-23/2002-03 shall remain :adency offhc appeal. It is inade e^pressiag auy o.puiion on the xiicrits With the above observations ^^ ^VW^ —^— suspeaded diiruig fhe ;lear fbat th& Court is not t)fthe pefitioaers appeal. aad directions, fhiis writ ^tition is disposed of Consequen^ly,i M.W.P.N6.3Q/2003 fbr gjia:Bt pf interun relief and I.A.No. 16^/2003 for tu^ent hearing ajso staad dispdsed d£ { Certified copyas perrules. ^ v r NTaii Judge •I RiS'^1 MS^Ssl K81 3S^^! ;i^i^ sai BB! i^ti "xs '.?.< Bt^ K^"-^1 B^S^S :^IV