1 ABA 966 OF 2011 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.966 OF 2011 Harish Anantrao Gaikwad .. Applicant. -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. Prashaant P. Jadhav, for the applicant. Ms. S. V. Sonavane, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 29th November, 2011 P.C. 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a person, who is alleged to have indulged in bashing of a hotel keeper and put him into a loss of Rs.1,50,000/- and also snatched Rs.30,000/- cash from the hotel. Learned counsel, for the applicant states that the applicant has not indulged in any such activities. All the same in order to show his bonafides, the applicant would deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with the trial Court, within a period of four weeks. In view of this, in the event of applicant’s arrest in C.R. NO.231 of 2011, registered at Karveer Police Station, District: Kolhapur, he be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs.1,00,000/- on the following conditions : i) The applicant shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- 2 ABA 966 OF 2011 before the trial Court, within a period of four weeks from the date of this order, which amount the learned trial Court, shall invest in the State Bank of India, to earn maximum interest and shall deal with the same at the end of the trial as per result of the trial. If the amount is not deposited within the stipulated period, the order shall stand revoked. ii) The applicant shall make himself available on 5th December, 2011 at 11.00 a.m. for interrogation by the Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required by the Investigating Officer. iii) The applicant shall also furnish his mobile telephone number and address and other details to the investigating officer. iv) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; v) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. vi) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial 3 ABA 966 OF 2011 Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, reported in A.I. R. 2011 (SC) 312. vii) The application stands disposed of . (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)