IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27871 of 2011 1.Rajpati Devi wife of Bhagwan Thakur 2.Asha Devi wife of Ashok Thakur 3.Ashok Thakur son of Bhagwan Thakur All are resident of village-Piparpati, P.S.- Jogapatti, District- West Champaran 4.Bubun Devi wife of Pramod Jha, resident of village-Bakhari, District-Muzaffarpur, at present resident of village-Piparpati, P.S.- Jogapatti, District- West Champaran. Versus The State of Bihar ----------- 3. 26.8.2011. The present application has been filed on behalf of petitioners for modification of the order dated 15.7.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No.22764 of 2011 by this court. It is to be noted that petitioner no.1 is grand mother-in- law, petitioner no.2 is mother-in-law, petitioner no.3 is father-in-law and petitioner no.4 is aunt-in-law of the informant. Learned counsel for petitioners submit that in course of argument he made submission on the basis of oral instruction given by one Rakesh Prasad, a registered Advocate Clerk of Sri Kesari Nandan Mishra, an Advocate of Bettiah Civil Court and had mentioned the age of petitioner no.1 to be 90 years, petitioner no.2 to be 65 years, petitioner no.3 to be 70 years and petitioner no.4 to be 65 years. He further submits that subsequently after the order granting anticipatory bail was passed, he could come to know that as per voter identity card the age of petitioner no.1 is 48 years, petitioner no.2 is 44 years, petitioner no.3 is 40 years and petitioner no.4 is 24 years. Having heard learned counsel for petitioners I am of the 2 view that before making submissions at Bar learned counsel must assure himself that what he is stating is true and correct and should not rely upon oral instructions given by a stranger to the case and make submissions on the basis of that. The court relies upon the statement made by learned counsel at Bar in course of argument. Since the order granting anticipatory bail dated 15.7.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No.22764 of 2011 was not dependent solely on consideration of age but on other facts and circumstances of the case also, the aforesaid order dated 15.7.2011 is modified to the extent that age of petitioners mentioned in the order be ignored and the period of surrender for the purpose of furnishing bail bonds before the court below is extended by three weeks from today. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present application is disposed of. Md.S. ( Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)