1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.578 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.554 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.578 OF 2009 Kochucherukan Radhakrishnan .... Petitioner Vs. M/s. Sangita Metal Corporation & Anr. .... Respondents Shri C.S. Joshi for the Petitioner. Shri D.R. More, APP, for the State. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. DATED: FEBRUARY 17, 2010 P.C: 1. The present revision application arises out of the order passed by the Special Metropolitan Magistrate & Judge of Small Causes Court, thereby convicting the petitioner for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and the order passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, thereby upholding the conviction, making slight modification in the order so far as the sentence is concerned. 2 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that substantial question of law arises in the present revision application in as much as though the amount was paid in cash to the employee of the complainant, the same was not taken into consideration by the Courts below. 3. In so far as this contention is concerned, it is found that except bare statement by the accused, there was nothing to substantiate the said contention. Leave aside, there is no cogent material in this respect. In that view of the matter, no perversity was noticed in the concurrent order so as to warrant interference. Hence the revision application is rejected. 4. In view of rejection of the revision application, the Criminal Bail Application No. 554 of 2009 stands disposed of. B.R. GAVAI, J.