IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15818 of 2010 Kala Vs. The Divisional Forest Officer, Territorial Forest Department, Fatehabad & another Present: Mr.Tara Chand Dhanwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The claim of the petitioner was declined on the ground that even if he had worked for 240 days, it will not lead to retrenchment in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court as he was a daily wager. Otherwise also, the material was produced before the Labour Court to show that the petitioner had not worked for 240 days. No infirmity, thus, is seen in the view taken by the Labour Court. Dismissed. September 06, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE