IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.39997 of 2010 Date of Decision: 30.6.2010 Krishan ......Petitioner Versus Jai Bhagwan etc. …..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Shri Ashish Gupta, Advocate, for Shri Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J (Oral). Challenge in the present petition is to the order passed by the learned first Appellate Court on 21.5.2010, whereby an application filed by the petitioner for impleading subsequent vendee during the pendency of the appeal was dismissed by observing that subsequent purchaser is hit by the doctrine of lispendens and the purchaser shall be bound by any judgment qua the suit land, which is sold during the pendency of the suit or appeal. I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the impugned order which may warrant interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. [ HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 30.6.2010 ds