IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO : 857 of 2009 Between: Sri Md. Khaja (died) and others ..... PETITIONERS AND The Assistant City Planner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Khairatabad, Hyderabad and another. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: The deceased first petitioner filed W.P.No.17327 of 2002 alleging that respondents 1 to 3 did not take any steps against the second respondent, who is making constructions in the neighbourhood of the petitioner contrary to the relevant provisions of law. The writ petition was admitted and interim order was passed on 07.10.2002 in W.P.M.P.No.21743 of 2002 in W.P.No.17327 of 2002, directing the 2nd respondent not to make any constructions. C.C.No.234 of 2003 was filed alleging that the 2nd respondent made constructions in violation of the interim orders. The contempt case was disposed of by this Court on 29.08.2003, accepting the apology of the second respondent by taking note of the part of the portion was removed. This contempt case is filed alleging that the second respondent made further constructions thereafter. A counter affidavit is filed by the second respondent denying the allegations. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent and the learned counsel for the second respondent. The petitioners assert that the second respondent has undertaken constructions in contravention of the orders of this Court. It is, no doubt, true that some finishing touches were given to the building. The grievance of the petitioners was mostly about the opening of the windows. The second respondent has clearly stated that the windows and doors opening towards the site of the petitioners were closed with bricks. The various aspects of the matter need to be considered at the hearing of the writ petition. The Contempt Case is closed, directing the Registry to list the writ petition for hearing next week, before the Court concerned. ______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J Date:20.10.2009 sj