-: 1 :- wp-1745/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1745 OF 2010. Surekha S. More. ..Petitioner. Versus M.C.G.M & Others. ..Respondents. Mr. V. B. Pandey for the petitioner. Ms. K. R. Punjabi for BMC. Mr. P. T. Parkar for R-2. Mr. A. B. Ketkar for R-3. Coram : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & R. V. MORE, JJ. Date : September 21, 2010. P. C. : 1. The petitioner is the sister-in-law of the 2nd respondent. Both the petitioner and the 2nd respondent are claiming right over Room No. D-22 situated at Siddharth Nagar, Bapti Road, Mumbai – 6. Respondent no.2 has made an application to the 1st respondent for getting the said room transfered in her name. The room, in fact, stands in the name of the petitioner. Surprisingly in the suit filed by the respondent in the City Civil Court at Mumbai, the 2nd respondent has not made the petitioner a party. The petitioner has, therefore, prayed that the 1st respondent should dispose of the 2nd respondent’s application after hearing her. Considering the fact srp -: 2 :- wp-1745/10 that the room in question stands in the name of the petitioner, we feel that the 1st respondent must hear the petitioner. Hence, we direct that the 1st respondent shall dispose of the 2nd respondent’s pending application in respect of transfer of Room No. D-22, Siddharth Nagar, Bapti Roat, Mumbai- 6, after hearing the petitioner. Notice may be issued to the petitioner in that regard. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (R.V. More, J.) (Smt. Ranjana Desai,J.)