:1: :1: :1: HIGH HIGH HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. CRI. CRI. REV. APPLICATION NO. 126 OF 2005. REV. APPLICATION NO. 126 OF 2005. REV. APPLICATION NO. 126 OF 2005. Shri. Mohammed Sajid Maniyar. ..Applicant Versus. Mrs. Shameen Banu Maniyar & Ors. ..Respondents. --- Mrs. Smita R. Kadu @ Gawai for the applicants. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE, D.B.BHOSALE, D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE: DATE: DATE: MAY 3, 2005. MAY 3, 2005. MAY 3, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel Mrs. Smita Kadu for the applicant. Perused the application and impugned judgment. By the impugned judgment, the maintenance amount has been enhanced by the trial Court, after taking into consideration the change in circumstances and the present cost of living. In the circumstances, no interference is called for. Criminal Revision Application is, therefore, rejected. 2. In view of the disposal of the main application, criminal application No. 2721 of 2005 does not survive. It is accordingly disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)