1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.781 OF 2008 PETITION NO.781 OF 2008 PETITION NO.781 OF 2008 BCH Electric Limited : Petitioners versus The Union of India : Respondents. Ms.S.Srikrishna i/by M/s.P.D.S.Legal for the petitioners. Mr.V.S.Masurkar, Government Pleader for Respondent No.4. Mr.K.R.Choudhary with Mr.Kiran Kandpile for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & : BILAL NAZKI & : BILAL NAZKI & S.S.SHINDE, S.S.SHINDE, S.S.SHINDE, JJ., JJ., JJ., DATED DATED DATED : JUNE 24, 2008. : JUNE 24, 2008. : JUNE 24, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the issues raised in this petition are no longer res-integra and have 2 been decided in Writ Petition No.5856 of 2007 and the writ petition has been dismissed. Following the same judgment, we dismiss this petition. However the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that protection be given to the petitioner as far as the goods which were circulated in the market prior to 1st April 2008. She further submits that in Civil Application No.1054 of 2008 in Writ Petition No.5856 of 2007 such protection was given. We have seen the order passed in that application. In that application, a statement had been made on behalf of the respondents that in respect of the goods which were cleared before 31st March, 2008 they will not take any action. No such statement is made in the present case by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents and as such we are not in a position to give such directions, as already given by other Bench in the earlier application. [BILAL [BILAL [BILAL NAZKI, J] NAZKI, J] NAZKI, J] [S.S.SHINDE, [S.S.SHINDE, [S.S.SHINDE, J] J] J]