IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12652 of 2010 DEV NARAYAN MAHATO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Considering that no injury was caused to any one and the occurrence took place on account of land dispute, let the petitioner above-named, who is in custody since 16.11.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Assistant Sessions Judge-1st, Khagaria in connection with Sessions Case No.61/2010 arising out of Gangaur (Khagaria) P.S. Case No.412/2009 subject to the following conditions :- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner (ii) That 2 the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (iii) The petitioner is directed to be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. It has been submitted that in the same occurrence another case i.e. Gangaur (Khagaria) P.S.Case No.413/2009 was instituted. The concerned court will consider amalgamation of the two cases in view of Section 220 Cr.P.C. V.K. Pandey (Anjana Prakash, J.)