1 SBCivil Writ Petition No.9479/2010 Hari Singh Riwar v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 9th December, 2010 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. G.S.Rathore, for the petitioner. .... By this petition for writ a direction is sought by the petitioner for respondent Sanjivani Credit Cooperative Society Limited for not terminating him from service. During the course of arguments learned counsel for the petitioner stated that as a matter of fact services of the petitioner have already been terminated on 20.8.2010 and as such by this petition for writ he also want to challenge his termination from service. The respondent is a multi state cooperative society, thus, an efficacious alternative remedy is available to the petitioner as per Section 84 of the Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002. I do not find any just reason to entertain this petition for writ ignoring the statutory remedy 2 referred above. It is further relevant to note that learned counsel for the petitioner utterly failed to satisfy the Court as to how the respondent society is amenable to writ jurisdiction of that court. As such without examining the issue pertaining to amenability of the respondents No.2 and 3 in writ jurisdiction of this Court the petition for writ is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy under the Act of 2002. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. kkm/ps.