IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35631 of 2010 AJAY YADAV & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 18.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned P.P. for the State. Allegedly, petitioners and other accused assaulted informant and several other persons. Admittedly, there is case and counter case between the parties. Learned counsel for petitioners points out that no specific overt-act has been attributed against these petitioners and all injured have received simple injuries said to be caused by hard and blunt substance. He further points out that no fire arm injury was found on any of the injured person but the learned Sessions Judge has wrongly mentioned that informant sustained fire arm injury over the tip of his nose. Considering the aforesaid circumstances, petitioners (Ajay Yadav and Bambhola Yadav), in the event of their arrest/ surrender within 30 days from the date of communication of the order, be released on bail in connection with Karagahar P.S. Case no. 30 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)