WP(C) 641/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE IA ANSARI Heard Mr. A Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Ms. M Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department, appearing on behalf of responden t. The petitioner’s father, while working as Headmaster of 1199 No. Teracherra LP S chool, under the Inspector of RK Nagar Education Block, Karimganj, retired, on a ttaining the age of superannuation, on 31-12-1998. The petitioner applied for ap pointment to the post of LP School Teacher under a scheme of the Government, whe reunder 10% of the total number of seats is kept reserved for the sons and unmar ried daughters of teachers of primary to secondary level schools. Claiming that the petitioner’s application had not evoked any response, the petitioner filed a writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for appr opriate direction. The writ petition gave rise to WP(C) No. 3765 of 2009. The wr it petition came to be disposed of, on 04-09-2009, with the following directions : In that view of the matter, this petition is disposed of with a direction to th e State respondents that as and when a selection process for appointment to the post envisaged to the above notification is initiated, the case of the petitione r, if he participates therein, would be considered for appointment and depending on his merit assessed against the quota prescribed subject to his satisfying ot her condition of eligibility prescribed by the notification. This, however, shou ld not be construed to be a direction to the respondent to appoint the petitione r in any post. On the ground that the petitioner had not appeared in any selection process for assessment of his merit and also considering the fact that the petitioner did no t have minimum educational qualification to be appointed as a teacher in LP Scho ol or ME Schools inasmuch as he has passed only HSLC examination and not Higher Secondary examination, which is the minimum prescribed qualification, the reques t for appointment was turned down by the respondent No. 2, namely, Director of E lementary Education, Assam, Kahilipara, Guwahait, by an order issued, on 19-09-2 009, which reads as under: However, if the petitioner acquire the requisite Educational Qualification may apply to fill up the vacant post under 10% reserved quota as and when advertised and same may be placed before the respective District Selection Committee alone with other similarly situated person for consideration of appointment against 1 0% quota. In view of the fact that the petitioner has, admittedly, not appeared in any selection process and is not even qualified for being appointed to the post of Assistant Teacher in LP School or ME School, this Court finds no infirmity i n the order, dated 19-11-2009, aforementioned, which stands impugned in this wri t petition. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ petition is dismi ssed on the ground that the petitioner has not been able to make out any case wa rranting this Court’s exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 2 26 of the Constitution of India. No order as costs.