IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) WEDNESDAY THE SIXTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE : PRESENT : THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE : J. CHELAMESWAR. AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE : M. VENKATESWARA REDDY. CONTEMPT CASE No. 460 of 2005 (Contempt Case under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon’ble Court in WPMP No. 19283/2001 in WVMP No. 1241 of 2004 in WP No. 15413 of 2001, dated 31-01-2005.) Between: 1. G. Srinivasulu. 2. K. Bathaiah. 3. P. Murali Krishna. .. PETITIONERS AND 1. Sri Ram Reddy, Commissioner, Tirupathi Municipality, Chittoor District. 2. Smt. Veena Eash, IAS, Secretary to the Government of Andhra Pradesh, MA and UD Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 3. The Secretary to Govt. of A.P., Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 4. Dr. Vijay Kumar, Commissioner and Director of Municipal Administration, AC Guards, Hyderabad. (Respondent No. 3 is not necessary) .. RESPONDENTS This Contempt case coming on for hearing and upon perusing the Case and Affidavit filed herein and the order of the High Court dated: 06-06-2005 and made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. P. Raghavender Reddy, Advocate for petitioners and the Govt. Pleader for Services-I, for the respondents 2 & 4, the Court made the following. ORDER: “ Pursuant to the notice ordered on 6-6-2005, respondent No. 1 is present. On behalf of respondent 2 and 4 applications are filed praying that their presence be dispensed with for the time being. Respondent No. 3, according to the petitioners is not a necessary party to the present proceedings. He was only added as a party to the writ petition. In the circumstances, accepting the reasons given in the affidavit filed in support of the two application, the presence of the respondents 2 and 4 is dispensed with for the time being. Learned counsel for the 1st respondent and learned Government Pleader for respondents 2 and 4 seeks time to file counter and prays that the presence of all the respondents be dispensed with. In the circumstances, two weeks time is granted for filing counter on behalf of the respondents and their presence is dispensed with for the time being. ” DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// for SECTION OFFICER contd.. 2 To 1. Sri Ram Reddy, Commissioner, Tirupathi Municipality, Chittoor District. 2. Smt. Veena Eash, IAS, Secretary to the Government of Andhra Pradesh, MA and UD Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 3. Dr. Vijay Kumar, Commissioner and Director of Municipal Administration, AC Guards, Hyderabad. (Addressees 1 to 3 BY RPAD along with a copy of petition and affidavit) 4. The Govt. Pleader for Services-I, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (By Special Messenger) 5. Two spare copies. USR HIGH COURT JCJ & MVRJ DATED : 06-07-2005 ORDER C.C. No. 460 of 2005 Dispensing with the presence of the respondents. HIGH COURT Drafted By : USR Drafted On : 07-07-2005 JCJ & MVRJ DATED : 06-07-2005 ORDER C.C. No. 460 of 2005 Dispensing with the presence of the respondents.