THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 162 of 2010. 1. Bhola Dutt Sati, S/O Late Sri Hari Dutt Sati, R/O 283/B Vipin Garden, P.O. Nawada, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059. 2. Amba Dutt Sati, S/O Late Sri Hari Dutt Sati, R/O Sector No.-4 L.O. 58 State Flat No.-2 Vijay Vihar Vikram Chowk, Rohini, Delhi. 3. Bhuwan Chandra Sati, S/O Late Sri Hari Dutt Sati, Lekhpal Tehsil Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand. 4. Girish Chandra Sati, S/O Late Sri Hari Dutt Sati, through Bhola Dutt Sati, R/O 283/B, Vipin Garden, P.O. Nawada, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059. 5. Narayan Dutt Sati, S/O Late Sri Hari Dutt Sati, through Smt. Sashi Sati, W/O Sri Narayan Dutt Sati, Forest Department (Seed Unit), Haryana Forest Pinjor (Haryana). … Petitioners. Vs. Mohan Chandra Sati, S/O Late Sri Hari Dautt @ Gusain Dutt, R/O Village Jai Devpur, Lokmanipur, Patti Haldu Khata, Tehsil Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal. …Respondent. Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioners. Date February 17, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Interim Relief Application No. 660 of 2010) Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. The only prayer made in this petition is that a direction in the nature of mandamus be issued to the Commissioner, Garhwal Mandal, Pauri to decide the Revenue Revision No. 6 of 2007-08, Mohan Chandra Sati Vs. Bhola Dutt Sati and others pending before him expeditiously as far as possible. According to the petitioners, the petitioners filed an application for mutation in Mutation Case No. 313 of 2004-05 Bhola Dutt and others Vs. Hari Dutt @ Gosain Dutt in the court of Tehsildar Kotdwar, under Sections 34/35 of the Land Revenue Act on the basis of a registered will. Respondent Mohan Chandra Sati filed objection against the application. Ultimately the application for mutation was 2 allowed by the Tehsildar vide order dated 10-7-2006. The respondent having been aggrieved by the said order preferred an appeal before the Assistant Collector, which was registered as Revenue Appeal No. 3 of 2006. The appellate court did not find favour with the respondent and dismissed the appeal by his order dated 17-8-2007. Further aggrieved by the said order, the respondent Mohan Chandra Sati filed a Revenue Revision under Section 21 of the Land Revenue Act bearing No. 6 of 2007, Mohan Chandra Sati Vs. Sri Bhola Dutt Sati and others before the Commissioner Garhwal Mandal, Pauri Garhwal. The said revision is pending for disposal since 1-10-2007. Considering the fact that the revision is pending since 1- 10-2007, it is a fit case in which direction for expeditious disposal may be issued to the Commissioner. Accordingly, the Commissioner Garhwal Division Pauri Garhwal is directed to decide the Revision bearing No. 6 of 2007, Mohan Chandra Sati Vs. Sri Bhola Dutt Sati and others, on merits, pending in his Court, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Both the parties shall co-operate with the revisional court in the speedy disposal of the said revision. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP 3