1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7687 OF 2008 Central Bank of India .. Petitioner Versus Mrs.Kusum Rajaram Kulkarni & Ors. .. Respondents Ms.Bharti J. Thakker i/by M/s.Consulta Juris for the petitioner. Ms.Kanta Pawar i/by Mr.Sanjay Kshirsagar for respondent No.1. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 17 th August 2009. P.C.: . The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks time to take instructions. 2. Looking to the nature of the challenge in this petition, time cannot be granted. The prayer in this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for quashing the proceedings of the civil suit filed by the respondent No.1. An application for temporary injunction filed in the said suit has been allowed by the trial Court. There is another order passed by the trial Court on 08 th October 2 2008 by which plea of bar of jurisdiction has been negatived by the trial Court. There is no challenge in this petition to any order passed by the trial Court. The first prayer is for quashing the proceeding of the suit and the second prayer is for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the learned trial Judge to vacate the order of temporary injunction granted by him. The petition is misconceived and the same is not entertained. However, it will be open for the petitioner to challenge the order of temporary injunction passed by the trial Court by filing appropriate proceedings. It will be also open for the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings for challenging the order dated 08 th October 2008. 3. Subject to what is observed above, writ petition is rejected. All contentions of the petitioner and all remedies of the petitioner are kept open. (A.S.OKA,J)