IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.220 OF 1990 State Bank of India ..Plaintiffs Versus M/s.Twinkle Diamonds ..Defendants ---- Ms.Arti Banarjee i/by Little & Co. for plaintiffs. ---- Coram : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J Coram : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J Coram : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J Date : 5th September,2007 PC 1. Counsel for the plaintiffs submits that she has received oral instructions from the appropriate authority of the plaintiffs that the plaintiffs are not interested in pursuing the present remedy as the matter has been amicably settled with the defendants. There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the statement made by the Counsel for the plaintiffs. On the basis of statement of the Counsel for the plaintiffs, the suit is allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally. Refund as per rules. 2. Counsel for the plaintiffs however, suggested that this order can be passed in the next week as she is awaiting further instructions. In the event contrary written instructions has been received by the Counsel, it will be open for the Counsel to get : 2 : this matter produced for re-call of the order already passed. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)