BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Eighth day of June Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.S.RAMANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.7800 of 2011 A.JEYARAMAN ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs. STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI, IN CR.NO. 25 OF 2011, MADURAI DISTRICT. ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.SATHISH KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 34, 120(b), 420, 468 and 471 I.P.C., in Crime No.25 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a bonafide purchaser and he purchased the land from one Seetharaman in the year 2008 and the defacto complainant also alleged to have purchased the land from one another Seetharaman, who claims to be the owner of the property. As the petitioner is the bonafide purchaser, he seeks anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that A1, Seetharaman taking advantages of the similarity in the names, sold the property, belonging to the defacto complaint, to the petitioner. The petitioner is the purchaser. 4. Considering the fact that the petitioner has purchased the land from the first accused and the original owner was one Neelakandan and without knowing the identification, he purchased the property, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 28/06/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, MADURAI. 2 -Do-Thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI, MADURAI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. S.SATHISH KUMAR Advocate SR.No.20512 akm/30.06.11 /2p-6c/ ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.7800 of 2011 Date :28/06/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/