IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36328 of 2009 1. KESHWAR RAI S/O LATE RUPLAL RAI VILL- MOHANPUR, P.S. SITAMARHI, DISTT. SITAMARHI 2. BHIKHARI RAI S/O KESHWAR RAI VILL- MOHANPUR, P.S. SITAMARHI, DISTT. SITAMARHI 3. SURENDRA RAI S/O KESHWAR RAI VILL- MOHANPUR, P.S. SITAMARHI, DISTT. SITAMARHI 4. UPENDRA RAI S/O KESHWAR RAI VILL- MOHANPUR, P.S. SITAMARHI, DISTT. SITAMARHI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.12.2009 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing for the state. Counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners as well as the informant, both deal in sale and purchase of land. A false case has been instituted as the petitioner demanded his share of money from the informant. It is also stated that the entire allegation including section 3(X) of the SC/ST Act is false. In fact, no offence u/S 3(X) of the SC/ST Act is made out on the basis of allegations made in the F.I.R. Considering the fact, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, the petitioners, named-above will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 88/09 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi subject to the conditions as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. AKV/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)