f €^ '^^ii IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BtLASPUR (C.G.l W.P. N0. A?^\ Cv 72005 PETITIONER ^f"., .^^< .^•<'n')-y"...•••" ^y^ ^ ...<1<^^>'" ^^^' ^y^ 'y" RESPONDENTS / Narsingh, S/o. Chamaru Gada Aged about^.-?..years R/o. Sanpanthi, P.C.No.10, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS / .....o / ^ ^ .^ ^ <°^ /2- €^' ^ ^- \ ^^t^ f^r -^ry ^.'\^i^ :1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary Department of Revenue D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya ^'X Raipur(C.G.) y Board of Revenue, Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Through: Its Presiding Officer Circuit Court, Raipur District-Raipur(C.G.) ^ 3. Sub-Divisional Officer Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) Naib Tahsildar Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 5. Smt. Dhanmoti, Wd/o. Jaikishan, R/o. Sanpanthi, P.C. No.10, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund(C.G-) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^' XI-HC-22 STT^T^T {^?TN?3TI^T sbHW^rf^T 3Fa^ ^ii<<i<rt<i, ^TnwKo, (®i<m'yy -_A?3®3?^^/E^' ^i^cii (»»HJ<t»»»»*^»^»»*»*^^**» ^F^/ 200 3TI^ST ?^cTOK ^if^T 14-9-2005 Mr. Raghavendra ^ Mr. Yashwant Siad State/respondeats| ^radhan, counsel for the petitioner, [h, Govemment Advocate for fhe |No.l,3and4. Revctaue learbed llas lor The petitioner ha^ aad correctoess of fhe oide^ passed by fhe Board of 46/2003-04, whereby the aside thie order passed by Divisioaal OflScer (Revenue), Divisional Officer (Revenue) decidmg fhe case, The mam. fhat as per the amended Chhattisgarh Laad Revenue Bojard of Revenue is not a specific bar imder fhe provis|o 1 • . •, . .. the Code. Having heard fhe counsel for ftie rcspondents N^ ppiaion fhat fhe order ioipug4e ifherefore, it is liable to be set /perverse aiid illegal, which / issuaace of notice to the the proceedings, as such fhe| Cdde, aufhotised ioipug4ed i^ respojadent cbNld^Nl^dT^fte^ifa^K ^3:rf^T3TI^T qiiestioned fhe legaUty, proprlely dated 18-5-2005 (Aimexure P-1) in Revenue Appeal No»305/A- Board ofRevenue, after settmg ^he first ap^llate Court ie, Sub- remaoded fhe case to the Sub- taking additional evidence aiid fenevance of fhe petitioner hereia is ^rovision of Section 49(3) of fhe 3|de, 1959 (henceforth <fhe Code% the to remand tiie case as fhere is to sub-section (3) of Sectioa 49 of |counsel for fhe petitioiier and fhe ^ 1, 3 axid 4, I aai of fhe considered is patentiy illegal and peryerse, ^side, and as fhe order impugped is liable to be set aside, fherefore, No,5 is goiag to further delay notice is not beiag issued to fhe XI-HC-22 3n^r^r R^icb^n^r Sb*llcb^ri^cf 3F5^^<l^ld^, ^i{iwi<o, (®«ruyy *41*{dl d*Ni**' ^lll*^^llll* * * ^t 20° 1^^' 3TI^ST ^^<1IW ^\W respondent No,5, However, by fhis oider, she wiU be modi&cation ofthis oxder aad ti^e rcspondent No.S, iffeels aggrieved |at Uberty to move fhis Court for |she wiU be heard tfaereafter, |sub-section (3) of Section 49 of fhe The provisions of\ Code are as under : - Sec. 49 : "Power <»fappeIIa|teautliority. - (1) xxxx xxxx xxxxx (2) xxxx (3) After heariagl may coixfirm, against; or may may consider nec^ssary for passmg fhe parties, the AppeUate Aufhority or rcverse fhe order appealed lake such additional evidence as it ite orda:: va|y Provided remaad the case subordmate to it^ Para 6 of tfae impl Board of Revenue has recordc aad first appellate Court a| accordance with law aad fh^ Divisional Officer (Revenue), Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenu| after considering fhe existingl material available on record cbN?d41-l ^l^dT^te<:^<(^<^K ^3:rf^R'3:n^?T xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx fh^t the AppeBate Aufhority shall not for disposal by any Revenue OfiBcer impjigned order shows (hat fhe teanied jd that fhe orders of fhe trial Court ajre set aside same being not ia matter is reniaaded to the Sub- paiaipati witfa a direction tfaat fhe s) shall take additiosial evidence aod |aad additional evidence aad ofher ajad hearing fhe parties shall decide (^t^^) aSpnf oopeqg 'yr^ -/PS 9vy. ^Sropxooov 'apoo aipjo fe)6frl aoirepioooB in ^Badd^ aq^ appop o^| 3TO. pUB 3p|8B ^38 81 p9Tl8ndl(Il J3pic| J<t? pBHpisiAta-qns w^ ^q uorepop joj ^ ^oa SBM 3iiu9A9y| jo pcreog ^q^ ^^BiO ^TiH^A^a ^XI@ ^q I^sodsip ^poipnB ^ysf^dd^ ^xy. vsxy. p^piAox^ 3T[| 3pp^p plie ^OII3pIA3 TeUOT^ppB | ^nn^Aay jo PIBOQ ^qj, •j^pio ^T ^BTO ^I €?B aOIX3pTA9 (B€COT»lppBI{0ns| J9plXO WQ. 88J9AM JO ATOA <uugnoo| 9ip. s3piAOiid qoTqM pire 3AoqB poy »Wjo 6ft? uoi^oag jo (g) uoi^oas-qnsl CT OTlI19A3y JO plIBOg OI[^ jo j3p3:o sny, li^ueit^te^ 11211^^a^^jl^tlhi4^bdtfe •saiiu joft SB Adoo pagpjaQ •PS»MOI{Bspue^s uotypsd |aOT»03gJO SUOTSIAOlld 3TR IRIM |p9»03jip ST anu^Aoy jo piBog 3Ip ^plSM OIp HI *(3nu3iA3y[) j^oggo 3pi^o ^ip. pireiEiai o» p^spoipn^ laiojM^qj, ^T o^ ^BTOpioqns ^SBO 9ip prremax ^on neqs j^ipjnj U93q SBT{ ^i 'J^BTO ^B^ o^ p^suoq^UB U93q 8Bq S^nssBd 10} Ajress^oou jepisuoo 35{B^ Q^ JO ^SUreSB p3p39ddB [o^ jaTpiai A^uoipna aiBd^ddB 4^4X3 H33q saq qoiqM <^POQ Ijo ^uoreiAojd 3ip o^ AjaQuoo 's^paux uo qssige JQI^BUX 3ip D^lft>fell^a ^ l^lte .&^............... OOZ y^^ ^—"'° ttoiHiu II^HIH -sa/^l£>^{^' ^mi^y <o)i^yi^ 'b^ibtk- in-p ^^ >' ^ I^u?s*o D^J^tfelhMS l^lkMbj^b] Itfe l^t^ ZZ-3H-DC