IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8635 of 1989 Date of decision: 30.03.2010 Shil Kumar ….Petitioner versus Food Corporation of India and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ------ Present: None for the petitioner. Mr.J.S.Basu, Advocate, for the respondents. ----- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? ----- K.Kannan, J (Oral) The case is of the year 1989. There is no representation for the petitioner and the counsel for the respondent is present. Registry reports that notice issued to the petitioner has been received back unserved with the report that the said person at present is posted somewhere in Delhi. The counsel who has appeared for the petitioner initially has been since elevated. The petitioner ought to have himself takes steps for effective representation but he has not so done. The case is, accordingly, dismissed for non prosecution. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 30.03.2010 sanjeev