IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15255 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 26, 2010. Arvind Kumar .....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Girdhar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.H.S.Brar, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.H.S.Brar, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioners is A-Class Government Contractor who is said to have executed the works allotted by the respondents from time to time. It is averred that the petitioner is entitled to the payment of more than Rs.12 lacs for the works already executed by him and in relation to which the final bills have also been submitted. It is also apparent from the C.W.P.No .15255 of 2010 2 speaking order dated 20.8.2010 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Executive Engineer-respondent No.3 that the petitioner is entitled to be paid a sum of Rs.10,90,930/-, but the same has not been released so far for want of sufficient funds. In this view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to release the due and admitted payments within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 26, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE