IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.57800 of 2007 DOMAN MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 5. 10.09.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2. The allegations are under Sections 498A of the Penal Code and Section 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The ground urged in the cancellation application is that the opposite party no. 2 was not a minor as represented before this Court. Be that as it may, there is no sufficient allegation against her which are generalised and omnibus in nature. Whether she be a minor or not to this Court is hardly relevant for the purpose of cancellation of the bail considering the matter on its own merit. This application is disposed with directions that the trial itself may be expedited and concluded at an early date for which it is submitted on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 that she shall be rendering all necessary assistance. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)