IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-16710 of 2011 (O&M) Udai Sharma @ Shanty .. Petitioner vs State U. T. Chandigarh .. Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Anurag Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rakesh Nagpal, Advocate, for U. T. Chandigarh Rajesh Bindal, J. By filing the present petition, the petitioner is seeking pre- arrest bail in FIR No. 96 dated 4.5.2011, registered under Sections 323, 506, 34 IPC, with Police Station Industrial Area, Chandigarh. On 27.5.2011, while noticing the following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner, notice of motion was issued:- “Counsel for the petitioner states that the real facts are that a scuffle had taken place between the complainant and the petitioner and that the prayer for anticipatory bail was declined only on the ground that the motor cycle of the petitioner was to be recovered. He further states that the petitioner is ready to deposit the motor cycle with the Investigating Officer.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a student. The motor cycle has already been surrendered by him. Learned counsel for Union Territory, Chandigarh on instructions from ASI Malook Singh submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation. Considering the aforesaid facts, the order dated 27.5.2011, vide which the interim bail was granted to the petitioner, is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. 25.7.2011 ( Rajesh Bindal ) vs Judge