1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.06.2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN Writ Petition (MD) No.6352 of 2011 Malaisamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. 2.The Hindu Marriage Registrar/ Sub Registrar, Kulathur Sun-Registrar Office, Keeranur, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 30.03.2011 within stipulated time fixed by this Court. For petitioner ... Mr.S.Vanchinathan For respondents ... Mr.T.R.Janardhanan, A.G.P. O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2. 2. By consent, this writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that he got married Anandhavalli on 29.06.1995 and the same was registered in the 2nd respondent office under the Madras Hindu Marriage (Registration) Rules, 1967. The 2nd respondent also issued marriage registration certificate. It is stated that there is a mistake about the caste of the petitioner in the registration certificate. It is also stated that there is another mistake in the name of the father of the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further stated that while he belongs to Hindu Chakkilian caste, in the marriage registration certificate, it is stated that the petitioner belongs to Vadugan community. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner enclosed the community certificate of the petitioner issued by the Revenue Department as well as the Transfer Certificate issued by the school authorities, in support of his submission. 5. The petitioner made representation on 30.03.2011 to the 2nd respondent to make necessary correction in his marriage registration certificate. But, no order is passed by the 2nd respondent. Therefore, the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition for the relief stated earlier. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 30.03.2011 and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. The Writ Petition stands disposed of on the above terms. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Accounts) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. 2.The Hindu Marriage Registrar/ Sub Registrar, Kulathur Sun-Registrar Office, Keeranur, Pudukkottai District. +1 CC to Special Government Pleader (SR.No.19128) W.P.(MD) No.6352 of 2011 17.06.2011 arul NSV/20.6.11/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/