-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 16 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8389 OF 2005 Rajendra Waman Waghmare ...Applicant Versus Ramesh SureshKamble and Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. R.K. Mendadkar with Ms. H.K. Mandlik for the applicant. Ms. Varsha Palav for respondent No.1. Mr. R.M. Patne, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Ms. Nisha Dabhade & Ms.Gita Joglekar, instructed by Mr. A.J. Bhor, for respondent No.4. CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR, Ag. C.J., & D.B. BHOSALE, J. DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 2006 . P.C. By this petition, the petitioner seeks review of the order passed by this Court on 14th December, 2005, which reads thus: “Rule. Implementation of order dated 5.12.2005 stayed until further orders. To be heard along with W.P. No. 8301 of 2005.” It is obvious, therefore, that the order dated 14th December, 2005 is an -2- interlocutory order of which review is not permissible in law. Moreover, Civil Application NO. 356 of 2006 is also pending for vacating of that order. Hence review petition is dismissed.