IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 30TH JUNE 2011 / 9TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 41060 of 2003(K) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- PARAGON STEELS PVT.LTD, NEW INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA, KANJIKODE. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR M.PARAMASIVAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.SRIKUMAR SRI.K.MANOJ CHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY POWER DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM PALACE.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, STATE SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE SPECIAL OFFICER(REVENUE), KSEB,VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM PALACE.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 & R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.N.SUDHA DEVI R2 & R4 BY ADV. SRI.P.SANTHALINGAM, SC, KSEB SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB FOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.41060/2003 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER NO.GO(MS)71/90/PD DATED 21/5/1990. P2 COPY OF THE BOARD ORDER NO.BO.PLG.COM/2015/90 DATED 19/6/1990. P3` COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER NO.GO(MS)NO.4/92/PD DATED 6/2/1992. P4 COPY OF THE BOARD ORDER NO.B.O.NO.559/92/PLG.COM DATED 27/3/1992. P5 COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE NO.HTB 1/154 DATED 18/12/2003 ISSUED BY THE BOARD. P6 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18/12/2003 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE KSE BOARD. P7 COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN WP (C)NO.38311/2003. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 41060 OF 2003 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T Counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-