IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.11069 of 2011 PREM LATA JHA - Petitioner/s(s) Versus SMT. KRISHNA DEVI - Respondent/s(s) _____________ 2. 13.07.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application is directed against the order dated 20.1.2011 passed by Sub Judge VIth, Darbhanga in Partition Suit No. 88 of 2005 whereby the learned court below allowed the amendment application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the transposed plaintiff for amendment of the plaint. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that at the very belated stage amendment application has been filed by the plaintiff respondent and the transposed plaintiff has no right to amend the plaint filed by the deceased original plaintiff Yogendra Jha. From perusal of the impugned order it appears that the learned court below found that on the death of the original plaintiff Yogendra Jha the defendant No.1 2 Smt. Krishna Devi has been transposed as plaintiff and further that during the pendency of the suit some documents have been crated. Accordingly, the said facts appear to be subsequent events and therefore, the learned court below allowed the amendment. Since it appears that on the basis of subsequent events the amendment application has been allowed by the learned court below, I find that the order is within the jurisdiction of the court below and it cannot be said that grave injustice has been done to the petitioner. Accordingly, I find no merit in this writ application. Thus, it is dismissed. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)