IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12826 of 2011 ABHIJIT PANDEY @ MUNNU PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 03.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and it appears from perusal of the impugned order that the name of this petitioner came in this case in course of investigation in the statements of witnesses, namely, Arjun Prasad and Arjun Kumar. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that Arjun Kumar is none else than own brother of the deceased and, as a matter of fact, he says that he had seen the petitioner and other accused fleeing from the place of occurrence. He further submits that had he seen the petitioner and other accused fleeing from the place of occurrence, he would have certainly disclosed the aforesaid fact to the informant before lodging the present case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City (Patna) in connection with Malsalami P.S. Case No. 209 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )