F [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. NO.20^^/2006 PETITIONER :- ^Ramji Mishra S/o late Tej Narayan Mishra, aged about 35 years, Assistant Grade-III, District Transport Office, Jashpur [C.G.], R/o Sarnatoli Jashpur, District Jashpur [C.G.] VERSUS RESPONDENTS ..•••"..y (1) Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Developinent Council A**' .^y^ ^y^ ,yy 9? Through: Its Managing Director ,°."••€•»?''''./•' Ravi Nagar, Raipur [C.G.] (2) Transport Commissioner, Chhattisgarh Raipur [C.G.]. (3) District Transport Officer, Jashpur, District Jashpur [C.G.]. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/ 227 OFCONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 *ii*ini s*»+<i<t> 3^ •<<I<IM<<, ®Tfl'H'i<s,Ri<fi*<y ^^ :^^S>X>...^b'^, 200 3<1^1 Math (yIgaK^tf) 3n^TwR-(i+ cWT 311^1 *H wnwBferw^T *l<<?d'!i1.< t<iqcf)'ft'fe'<!l <R|^K ^srf^ira.n^T b^ 29^-2006:- Heard Shri J.K. Shastri, Bythe instantpetition, the order dated 6-6-2006 passed Officer whereby the services of CIDC from where the petitioner Department.and He has been suspension on the ground that Section 376 ofthe i.P.C. and and Scheduled Tribes in custody from 3-4-2006 to 27-5-? Therefore, the loanee repatriate frie services of an the petitioner has been placed criminal charge and same is substance in thi's writ petition, s^ herebydismissed. Consequently,M.(W.)P. wtas coijnsel for the petitioner. t>etitioner has questioned legaiity of the respondent No.3, District Transport fie petitioner have been repatriated to sent on deputation to the Transport repatriated after placing him under ^ie was arrested under the charge of Secpon 3 (1) (12) ofthe Scheduled Castes (Prevention| of Atrocities) Act, 1989 as he remained 4006. cfep^rtment is alwayswithin its discretion to who is on deputation. SVtoreover, ujider suspension on account of serious p^nding. Therefore, 1 do not find any tme is liable to be dismissed and it is Not2343/2006 stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge ^