IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr. Appeal No.324 of 2003. Date of Decision_25th November,2010. _______________________________________________ State of H.P. ….Appellant. Versus. Nagender Kumar and others. ….Respondents. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. Whether approved for reporting1? For the appellant :Mr.P.K.Sharma, Addl. Advocate General. For Respondent. :Mr.Deepak Kaushal, Advocate. Dev Darshan Sud, J.(Oral). This appeal has been preferred by the State praying for enhancement of sentence on the respondents who are the appellants in Criminal Appeal No 284 of 2003. The basic ground for claiming such enhancement is that an offence under Section 498-A resulting in the death of an innocent life requires to be visited with exemplary punishment. It is unnecessary for me to consider that aspect of the case as the respondents have been acquitted of all the offences. The appeal is dismissed. (Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. November 25, 2010(R) Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment?