IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13496 of 2010 1. AJEET KUMAR @ AJIT MISHRA 2. SUJIT KUMAR @ SUJIT KUMAR MISHRA BOTH ARE S/O RAMAJANAM MISHRA 3. RAM JANAM MISHRA S/O LATE JAGDISH MISHRA R/O VILLAGE KANTA, P.S. GAIGHAT (BENIBAD) DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. 4. AMIT KUMAR S/O NARESH SINGH R/O VILLAGE ROHUA P.S. VARIS NAGAR DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR ………………… Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………. Opposite Party ----------- 2. 13.12.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 21.10.2009 passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Muzaffarpur in Gaighat P.S. Case No. 270/08, by which he has taken cognizance under Section 376, 511, 323, 34 I.P.C. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the facts of the case no offence under Section 376, 511 I.P.C. is made out and, therefore, charge sheet was submitted under Section 354 I.P.C. Considering that at the stage of cognizance this minor discrepancy in describing the Sections in which cognizance has been taken has no relevance, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )