1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 30 of 2011 with Criminal Application No. 31 of 2011 and Criminal Application No. 32 of 2011 Jugalkishor v. State of Maharashtra; Santoshkumar v. State of Maharashtra and Smt Shakuntalabai and ors v. State of Maharashtra ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr S.N. Bhattad, Advocate for applicants Mr D.B. Yengal, Mr M.K. Pathan and Ms Kalyani Deshpande, APPs for respondent Coram: A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 8th June 2011 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Applicants made application under Section 408 Cr. P. C. before the Sessions Judge, Akola with prayer that anticipatory bail applications bearing nos. 101/11, 106/11 , 129/11, 146/11 and 147/11 may be placed before one and the same Sessions Court since subject-matter arises out of one Crime viz. Crime No. M-1/2011. Learned Sessions Judge rejected the said application vide order dated 27.4.2011 holding that the same is misconceived and contrary to the mandate of the provisions of Section 408 Cr. P. C. 2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutors appearing in these applications have jointly given no objection if the applicants’ anticipatory bail applications, referred to above, are placed before one and the same Sessions Court competent to deal with them. 2 3. Having heard learned counsel for the applicants and in the light of no objection given by respective Additional Public Prosecutors, impugned order is set aside. Learned Sessions Judge, Akola is directed to place anticipatory bail applications bearing nos. 101/11, 106/11 , 129/11, 146/11 and 147/11 filed by the applicants before one and the same Sessions Court empowered to deal with the same. Applications stand disposed of accordingly. Hamdast. Judge. hsj