IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29759 of 2008 RAJ KUMAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. AYODHYA MALI. ----------- 2/ 30/9/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is the husband apprehending arrest in a complaint case under Sections- 498A of I.P.C. and ¾ of D.P. Act. Learned counsel fairly submits that in an earlier criminal prosecution filed by the brother of the petitioner against the complainant and his family members, they appeared in the court below whereafter they were enlarged on bail. In the acrimonious relationship between the parties, this Court finds no reason to grant any different treatment to the petitioner. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioners shall be considered in the same manner and disposed off appropriately as that of the bail application of the complainant and his family members, without being prejudiced by the present order. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )