IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) 11825 of 2008. Decided on December 6, 2011. Satish Kumar son of Sh. Kanshi Ram resident of Village & PO Sajao, Piplu, Tehsil, Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. …Petitioner. Versus. 1. State of H.P. through its Secretary (Education) to the Government of H.P., Shimla. 2. Director of Education, Govt. of H.P., Shimla. 3. Deputy Director of Education, Mandi, Distt. Mandi, H.P. 4. Deputy Director of Education, Lahaul Spiti, Distt. Lahul Spiti, H.P. 5. Headmaster, Govt. High School, Tindi, Distt. Lahul Spiti, H.P. 6. Headmaster, Govt. High Coiurt Hawani, P.O. Ropari, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate, with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Asstt. AG. Surjit Singh, Judge (oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner says that in view of letter dated 31.3.2005, issued by respondent No. 2, on the basis of interim stay granted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, petitioner is continuing as Para Teacher and will continue to work as such, till further orders. He says that in view of the above stated position, present matter may be disposed of, with right reserved to the Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - petitioner to move the Court again, in case some adverse order, affecting his service, is issued. Petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid submission. December 6, 2011 (PC) (Surjit Singh), J.