IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29114 of 2010 FEKU DOME Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 12.02.2010 in a case registered under Section 395 of the I.P.C. Though the F.I.R. was lodged against unknown but subsequently the petitioner was arrested on suspicion but nothing was recovered from his possession. Moreover, when the petitioner was put on T.I. Parade the informant refused to appear and identify the petitioner. From the impugned order, it appears that the witnesses have only said that the petitioner was seen near the place of the occurrence on the alleged date of occurrence. Considering the nature of allegation and the period under custody, let the petitioner, Feku Dome, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Patna City in connection with Khajekala P.S. Case No.240 of 2009. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)