IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. App. No. 458 of 2008 Old No. 1683 of 1997 Mohd. Waheed Khan & Others. …….. Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. …….. Respondents Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A for respondent no 1. Mr. Navnish Negi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. G.S. Negi, Advocate for respondent no. 2. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A for respondent no. 1. Mr. Navnish Negi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. G.S. Negi, Advocate for respondent no.2. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C for seeking relief and for quashment of the F.I.R dtd. 23.01.1997 in case crime no. 67/1997 u/s 498-A IPC & ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, lodged against them. This petition was filed during the course of the investigation and accordingly an order was passed on 01.10.1997 granting relief to the petitioners. 3. In view of the judgments passed by the Allahabad High Court in R.L. Yadav V. State reported in 1989 A.Cr.R page 118 at 125 and in Mrinal Kant Malik Vs. State of U.P reported in 1999(1) Allahabad Criminal Reports 106, this petition under section 482 Cr.P.C is not maintainable. 4. Moreover, the chargesheet has been filed before the court concerned after filing of this petition and challenge has been made against the cognizance order as well as for quashing the chargesheet before this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 5. Under the aforesaid circumstances, the petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as infructuous. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 27.11.2008 V.K