IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3875 of 2004 DR.GAURI SHANKAR PATHAK, son of late Pandit Ram Lakhan Pathak, resident of village Pathakhaulia, P.O. Fakrabad, Police Station – Kudra, District – Kaimur (Bhabhua). ____ Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Department, New Secretariat, Vikas Bhawan, Patna. 2. The Additional Secretary, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Department, New Secretariat, Vikas Bhawan, Patna. 3. The Deputy Secretary, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Department, New Secretariat, Vikas Bhawan, Patna. ______ Respondents ----------- 04. 21.7.2010 The Court does not have to record a detailed order in this matter in view of the fact that another writ application namely, CWJC No.15307 of 2001 in similar circumstances filed by one Dr. Sidheshwar Singh was taken up by a learned Single Judge and an order was passed on 30.9.2008. Taking note of some of the submissions including the fact that certain juniors similarly situated had been given the benefit of second time bound promotion denying the petitioner such a benefit as also taking note of the fact that no notification with regard to cancellation of that benefit granted to the juniors had been actually produced, the matter was allowed in the sense the petitioner of that case was given liberty to bring all these facts to the notice of the concerned respondents and they were given three months time to decide the issue. Stand of the petitioner is that matter is identical and a similar order ought to be passed in the present case as well. The writ application is disposed of with liberty to the 2 petitioner to file an application before the competent authority with a copy of the order passed in CWJC No. 15307 of 2001, who shall pass an order in given set of facts preferably within a period of three months of the filing of such a petition. The writ application is disposed of with the above direction and liberty. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)