(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 7439 OF 2008 Rajesh s/o. Sakaram Choudhari, Age : 37 years, Occupation : at present, nil, R/o. Kusumba (Ner), Taluka and District : Dhule. .. Petitioner. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra (Through Secretary of Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.) 2. Additional Director General of Police, Training and Special Cell, Maharashtra State, Mumbai. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Nandurbar, Dist. Nandurbar. .. Respondents. .......................... Mr. P.B. Patil, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Kadam, Assistant Government Pleader, for the respondents. .......................... (2) CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 1ST SEPTEMBER 2009. COURT'S ORDER : 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the petition with further liberty to take recourse to alternate remedy under the provisions of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. 2. Hence, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is made clear, that if there is delay in filing application before the Tribunal, the petitioner shall be entitled for the benefit under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, for the period during which the petitioner was bona fide prosecuting the present petition. ( N.D. DESHPANDE ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp7439