IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 27TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 5TH ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 22650 of 2007(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ K.P.SATHYAN, KIZHAKKEPURAYIL HOUSE, P.O.KUNHIMANGALAM, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR, REPRESENTED BY ITSL SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. SABU M.R. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 22650 of 2007 -------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of September, 2007 J U D G M E N T Petitioner had approached for a regular permit and modification of the route was made by Exhibit - P1. However, the 1st respondent has rejected the application by Exhibit-P2 order without taking note of modification applied for by the petitioner in Exhibit-P1. Since it is a fact that petitioner had sought modification, the rejection of the petitioner's application ignoring the same is illegal. For that reason, I quash Exhibit-P2 and direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's application in the light of its modification as per Exhibit-P1. This shall be done within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the respondents, for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) ma K.THANKAPPAN,J CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999 ORDER 25th May, 2007