IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.R. No.: 205 of 2008. Decided on: 17.12.2010. _________________________________________________________ Het Ram. … Petitioner. Versus Mahesh Pal Sharma and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Vinay Thakur, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J.(Oral): With the consent of parties, appellate order 26th August, 2008 is set aside. Appellate authority is directed to re-hear the appeal and complete the proceedings within a period of four months from today. It is made clear that the appellate authority shall appraise the entire ocular and documentary evidence produced by the parties. In order to avoid delay, the parties are directed to make themselves available before the appellate authority on 31st December, 2010. Records are ordered to be re-transmitted to the first appellate authority within one week. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 17, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.