IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 45 of 2003 (M/B) Uttam Sugar Mills Ltd., Libberhedi, Roorkee, District Haridwar, Through its Occupier. …. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary, Department of Cane And Sugar industries, Uttaranchal Shasan, Dehradun. 2. Cane Commissioner, Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 3. Assistant Cane Commissioner, Haridwar. 4. Cane Co-operative Society, Iqbalpur, Roorkee, Haridwar through its Secretary. 5. Occupier, Rai Bhadur Narayan Singh Sugar Mills Ltd. Laskar, District Haridwar 6. Occupier, the Maha Laxmi Sugar Mills Ltd. Iqbalpur, District Haridwar. 7. Occupier, U.P. Rajya Chini Nigam Ekai, Doiwala, Dehradun. ….. Respondents ………. Mr. Alok Mehra, Advocate for the petitioner. None for respondents 1 to 6. Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for respondent no.7. Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Alok Mehra, Advocate for the petitioner. None for respondents 1 to 6. Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for respondent no.7. 2. Mr. Alok Mehra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition now has become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 28.04.2006 28.04.2006 A