MC 110/2005 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY In MAC 17/05 Heard Mr Islam, learned counsel for the applicant. In terms of the order dated 10.1.2011 of this Court, paper publication o f the notice of the instant Misc. case has been made in the issues dated 10.2.20 11 and 13.2.2011 of the local dailies Eastern Chronicle and Dainik Batori Kak at vis-à-vis the opposite party Nos. 2 and 3. The opposite party No.1 though al so served with the notice has not entered appearance. The opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 as well have not arranged for their representation. No prayer for adjournm ent has also been made on behalf of any of the opposite party. Upon hearing Mr Islam and on a consideration of the averments made in th e application, this Court is of the view that sufficient cause has been shown to explain the delay of 100 days in preferring the accompanying appeal. The delay of 100 days in preferring the accompanying appeal is, therefore, condoned. Misc. case is allowed.