S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10517/2009 Shahbuddin Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 9.12.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA,J. Ms. Nupur Bhati,for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner was appointed on contract basis and as per contract, his contract come to an end on 30.09.2009. The petitioner was informed vide communication dated 30.06.2009 that State Government has not sanctioned the post which the petitioner is holding, therefore, his service is to has come to an end w.e.f. 30.09.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the same post of Computer Programmer, the extension was given to one Shri Pareen Rawal vide order dated 03.03.2009 and therefore, it cannot be said that State Government has not sanctioned the post. It is also submitted that it cannot be presumed that post for one place in the State of Rajasthan has not been sanctioned by the State Government and post has been sanctioned for other place in the State of Rajasthan. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. Admittedly, the term of the appointment of the petitioner has come to an end w.e.f. 30.09.2009 and there is no reason to disbelieve that the Government has not sanctioned the post of Computer Programmer. In the order dated 3.03.2009, which has been passed by another organization i.e., Zila Parishad, Udaipur there is no mention that the State Government has sanctioned the post whereby extension of services of Sh. Pareen Rawal has been granted from 1.03.2009 to 28.02.2010, therefore, it cannot be a basis to presume that the decision taken by the respondent at Jhalawad by saying that post has not been sanctioned by the State Government is factually wrong. In view of the above, since there is no sanction by the State Government for the post concerned, and it was only contract employment therefore, petitioner has no right to seek continuation on the post. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA),J. Bharti