*1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3737/2009 Sharad Bhagwan Shinde and others. ..Applicants ­VERSUS­ The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent ............... Mr.Ajay A. Joshi, Advocate for the Applicants. Ms.P.P.Shinde, A.P.P., for the Respondent/State. ............... CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. Dated 25th September, 2009. PC:­ 1 An offence has been registered against the present Applicants in Crime No.34/2009 with the Pandharpur Police Station for the offences under Sections 363 and 366 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2 Apprehending arrest, the present Applicants moved the Sessions Court by an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Sessions Judge by order dated 27.04.2009 did grant anticipatory bail as prayed for. The relevant portion of the order reads thus:­ “The interim bail granted to the Applicants as per order dated 02.03.2009 below Exhibit­4 in Criminal Misc. Application No. 54/2009 is hereby confirmed till filing of the charge sheet.” However, after laying down the conditions for grant of *2* anticipatory bail, the Sessions Judge has issued yet another direction which runs contrary to the direction extracted herein above. The said direction is as under:­ “After period of two months from today the Applicants shall move regular court for regular bail”. 3 The learned counsel for the Applicants relying on the judgment reported in 2008(2) Bombay C.R. (Criminal) 138 (Prashant Kishor Mehta Vs. State of Maharashtra), urges that the first part of the order grants anticipatory bail till filing of the charge sheet whereas other part of the order mandates the Applicants to move the Court for regular bail which is uncalled for and runs contrary to the earlier part of the order. Thus, limited prayer is made for deletion of the said condition/direction which reads thus:­ “After period of two months from today the Applicants shall move regular court for regular bail”. 4 The learned APP has no objection for deletion of that part of the directions. 5 In that view of the matter, following condition/direction appearing in the order dated 27.04.2009 passed by the Sessions Judge granting anticipatory bail shall stand deleted:­ “After period of two months from today the Applicants shall move regular court for regular bail”. 6 The Application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. ­sd­ (A.P. Deshpande, J)