IN THE HIGH COURT OF IQQICATURE OF CHI-lA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR 3 WRIT PETITION No. [Sgj [2005 PETITIONERz- I, ( M/ s. Champion Ceramics Private limited Throughz- Sajjan Agrawal Aged about 48years S/O- Rud Mal Agrawal Industrlal area Korba Road Champa ,,...zf”§j m I.g; “" Distt— R/O- Near Jangir Railway Champa Station (C.G.) Champa o/} Distt- Jangir Champa (C.G.) / VERSUS ’ 1) Coal India Limited, through:— Its Chairman, 10, Netaji Subhash Raod Kolkata, (VVest Bengal) 2) Chairman cum managing Director, South Eastern Coal Field Limited. 10 Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Tahsiland District- Bilaspur (C.G.) / 3) The General Manager (Sales), 10 Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District ~ Bilaspur (C.G.) / 4) State of Chhattisgarh Through :- Secretary Ministry of Industrial Development D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) -/i 5) Union of India 0 5 Through :- Secretary M l Ministry of Industrial Development New Delhi § : 1% .. w @ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226z227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC—22 WWW WWW Wm‘ aamanaw ‘ 104' Shri Y.C. Shanna for the Shri Vinod Deshmukh caveat, for respondent no.4. Shri Parag Kotecha, P.L., Thakur Vijay Singh, Ass tt. Solicitor General for Union of India] respondent no.5. Application for urgent hearing is allowed. Heard on LA. No.2982/05 for exemption from filing typed copies of the documents. The application is allowr :d. Exemption is granted from filing typed copies of the docun Heard. Shri Deshmukh takes r no.1 to 3, Shri Kotecha takes no.4 and Thakur Vijay Sing respondent no.5. Learned counsel for the matter is covered by a decisim passed in WP. No.1082/05 (R: and others). He produced the ( placed on record. The aforesaid fact is not appearing for the'other side. 25 I 4/ 2005 On a mention being mad s, the case is taken up. petitioner. for respondents no.1 to 3 on lents. otice on behalf of respondents notice on behalf of respondent gh takes notice on behalf of petitioner contended that the 1 dated 1/4y2005 of this Court .shi Minerals vs. Coal India Ltd. ~opy of the said judgment. It be disputed by the learnedcounsel (daW) XI—HC-22 105 mmm wzv It is submitted that documents befom the authorit The pain} documents, which are relev thereof have been mentioned i submitted that the petitione supply of'coal as per linkage < been done by this Court in the This Court in the judgi WP. No. 1082/05 has held as “Shri Shawna, le petitioners, submits fiied the documents required on 16/ 12/2 have also submitted relevant for their u have been menti evidence. In that vie is that those petitic documents before th 16/12/2004 and ha before this Court: continue supply of co till verification, Shri the petitioners who before the authority ‘ mmifwm 35Wa1éw the petitioner has tiled the y as required on 16/ 12/2004 as )ner has also submitted the mt for its units, and reasons vith documentary evidence. It is r may be allowed to continue :onditions till verification, as has aforesaid case. nent dated 1/4/ 2005 passed in under: emed counsel for the that the petitioners have before the authority as 004 as per checklist. They the documents, which are tits, and reasons thereof med with documentary, w of the matter, the prayer ners who have filed the e authority as required on ve also filed the documents they may be allowed to xl as per linkage conditions Koshy, learned oounselfor the respondents, submits that pending decision, have filed the documents I and this Court may be allowed to continue S'ipply of coal as per linkage t conditions. " per checklist. . XI-HC—ZZ EW,'WW, W Wm - mm WPlBa/S a1 ' ‘200 m “ (\ U