acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1173 OF 2009 Paramount Chemical And Acid Corporation …Plaintiff. Vs. Aura Oil Industries & Ors. . …Defendants. ---- Mr. Vipul Shukla for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. ---- CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 20TH NOVEMBER 2009. P.C.: 1. Affidavit proving service of writ of summons at the addresses mentioned therein, is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. 2. Mr. Shukla, learned Advocate for the Plaintiff produces the original documents along with list, they are taken on record, and marked ‘X-1’ for identification. 3. On perusal of the plaint and the original documents, it is apparent, the summary suit is filed on a written contract as evidenced by the delivery challans and bills. The goods mentioned therein have been received and there is no protest from the defendants. They were called upon to make the payment under the invoices, which have not been made. The demand notice also is duly received. 1 Apart from making payment of Rs.20,000/-, nothing has been paid thereafter. In the result and when I am satisfied that the suit is maintainable as summary suit, this court has jurisdiction to entertain and try the same and the claim of the plaintiff is within limitation, that I proceed to pass decree. There shall be a decree as prayed. 4. Advocate’s costs to be computed as rules. 5. Refund of court fees as per rules. ( S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) 2