IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5860 of 2007 SATYENDRA DUBEY, son of Ram Sakal Dubey, resident of Khairadeep, P.O. Khairadeep, P.S. Daudanagar, District Aurangabad ... Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Secretary cum Commissioner of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The Director of Primary Education, Bihar, Patna 4. Regional Deputy Director, Magadh Range, Gaya 5. District Education officer, Aurangabad 6. The Sub-divisional Education Officer, Aurangabad 7. Block Extension Officer, Aurangabad 8. Block Extension Officer, Daudnagar, District Aurangabad 9. Block Extension Officer, Navi Nagar, District Aurangabad 10. Block Extension Officer, Goh, District Aurangabad 11. Block Extension Officer, Hanspura, District Aurangabad 12. Block Extension Officer, Hanspura, District Aurangabad 13. Block Extension Officer, Barun, District Aurangabad 14. Mukhia Gram Panchayat, Belawa, District Aurangabad 15. Mukhia Gram Panchayat, Tejpura Obra Block, District Aurangabad 16. Mukhia Gram Panchayat, Ebrahimpur, District Aurangabad 17. Mukhia Gram Panchayat Naur, Navi Nagar Block, District Aurangabad ... Respondents ----------- 2. 28.10.2010 Having heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State as also taking into account that the following prayer of the petitioner in this writ application: “(A) An appropriate writ, order or direction may be issued to the 2 respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of a teacher in Govt. School. (B) The Hon’ble High Court may direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of teacher in the light of the direction of the Hon’ble Supreme Court passed in S.L.P.No. 23187/1996 and also in C.W.J.C.No. 13246, 6661/2003 (Nand Kishore Ojha and others vs. the State of Bihar & ors.)” is absolutely vague, inasmuch as so far it relates to a direction on the post in a Government School. It is well settled that the Government schools have different categories and the post of teacher in all these Government schools are filled up in view of different Rules and Regulations. The petitioner cannot claim his appointment on any post of the teacher in Government school as a matter of right only because he is trained graduate. The other part of the relief that in terms of pending case of Nand Kishore Ojha before the Apex Court S.L.P.No. 23187/1996 a direction should be issued for his appointment is also misconceived, 3 inasmuch as monitoring by the Apex Court is already being made wherein the next date is 30th November, 2010. If the petitioner by virtue of being a trained graduate has already filed application and his counseling has been completed he may also await the compliance of the order of the Apex Court requiring appointment on the post of trained teachers in accordance with law. With the aforementioned observation, this application is disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/