1 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 295 OF 2009 IN APPEAL (L) NO. 733 OF 2008 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 62 OF 2005 IN PETITION NO. 1220 OF 1998 Jethibai Bhagwandas Parmar .. Appellant Vs. Sangeeta Motilal Parmar .. Respondent Mr. Pankaj S. Shah for appellant. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & C. L. PANGARKAR, JJ. January 27, 2010. P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. The appellant has filed Appeal under Lodging No. 733 of 2008 but belatedly. As per the appellant the appeal is beyond time by about two 2 years and four and half months. Hence, this Notice of Motion for condonation of delay. We have gone through the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion and we are satisfied that the delay caused deserves to be condoned but by levying costs. Hence the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of payer clause (a) subject to payment of costs quantified at Rs.2000/-. The costs amount to be remitted to the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority within two weeks from today. (C. L. PANGARKAR, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)