THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO :3639 of 2011 ORDER: This revision is filed against the order dated 11.2.2011 passed by the III Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, rejecting E.A.No.150 of 2011 in EP (SR) No.3820 of 2010 in O.S.No.2070 of 1990, filed by the petitioner-Decree holder to dispense with the filing of certified copy of decree in O.S.No.2070 of 1990. The petitioner-decree holder filed the suit in O.S.No.2070 of 1990 for specific performance against the respondent and obtained decree and the appeals filed by the respondents were also dismissed and hence, the decree has become final. For the execution of the decree, the petitioner filed the EP along with the impugned application viz., EA No.150 of 2011 to dispense with the filing of C.C. of decree of lower Court in the suit. The Court below rejected the EA on the ground that as per Rule 210 of Civil Rules of Practice, each execution petition shall be accompanied by certified copy of judgment or order and under Rule 211, a petition, which has not complied with the provisions of CPC or Civil Rules of Practice, shall be returned or rejected. Hence the present revision. Heard the learned Counsel and perused the material available on record. The reason assigned by the petitioner is that he applied for certified copy of judgment and decree in the suit and the appellate Court for the purpose of executing the decree, but the said application was returned on the ground that the records were not received from the High Court and he made an application before the High Court in CD No.5299 of 2007 for obtaining certified copies, however, the High Court returned the copy application with an endorsement that the records were already sent to the lower Court and thereafter he made another application before the Court below and till this date, the judgments of both the Courts below are not traceable even though the records were sent by the High Court to the lower Court and hence, the copy application has been kept pending. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed Xerox copy of the decree and he undertakes to produce the certified copy of the same as and when the same is furnished to him. In the above facts and circumstances and in view of the above submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to direct the Court below to register the E.P. and take necessary action for obtaining the decree from the Court, which passed it and the petitioner is also directed to furnish the certified copy as and when the same is furnished to him. Subject to the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ___________________________ Justice Ghulam Mohammed Date: 16.9.2009 BCJ THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO : 3639 OF 2011 16.09.2011 BCJ