IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34670 of 2010 GHANSHYAM SAH, son of Nathuni Sah Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/- 10.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Petitioner, namely, Ghanshyam Sah apprehends his arrest in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 3 of 2010, registered under Section 7 of the E.C. Act. As per the First information Report four bags containing 50 kg rice and one bag containing 60 kg. rice were recovered from the shop of the petitioner but he was not made accused in the First Information Report. Subsequently, during the course of investigation, he was shown as accused. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner deals food grains business and as a matter of fact, the aforesaid seized articles had been kept by the petitioner for selling in open market. He also points out that First Information Report named accused, Pawan Kumar Sah having similar allegation has already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by the another Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No 16867 of 2010. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within 30 days from receipt of the order, the petitioner, named above shall be released on bail on furnishing 2 bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 3 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. Ashwini/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)