IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 12TH DECEMBER 2011 / 21ST AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 33073 of 2011(H) -------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. NIBIN MATHEW, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.MATHEW CHERIYAN, KUNNELPUTHENVEEDU, PATHIYOOR.P.O., BHAGAVATIPPADI, ALLEPPEY. 2. ABIN ABRAHAM, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.ABRAHAM THOMAS, AMBATTU HOUSE, PAMBAVALLEY, NORTH.P.O., ERUMELY. BY ADV. SRI.K.A.MANZOOR ALI. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (CUSAT), REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, THRIKKAKKARA.P.O., KOCHI-22. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (CUSAT), UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, THRIKKAKKARA.P.O., KOCHI-22. R1 & R2 BY SRI. S.P.A. PILLAI, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/12/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.33073/2011-H: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:- EXHIBIT P1- TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT SHOWING THE REMITTANCE OF FEES FOR REVALUATION OF IST PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P2- TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT SHOWING THE REMITTANCE OF FEES FOR REVALUATION OF 2ND PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 33073 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the examination was declared, they had failed in one paper. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge