IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47320 of 2007 JYOTISH KUMAR CHOUDHARY, ALIAS SATISH KUMAR JAISWAL, SON OF SRI LAL BAHADUR CHOUDHARY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SHRIPUR, POLICE STATION- KISHANPUR, DISTRICT- SUPAUL. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. POOJA KUMARI 3. PANKAJ KUMAR BOTH MINOR DAUGHTER AND SON OF JYOTISH KUMAR CHOUDHARY, ALIAS SATISH KUMAR JAISWAL THROUGH BHARAT CHOUDHARY, RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE-GANPATGANJ, POLICE STATION- RAGHOPUR, DISTRICT- SUPAUL. For the petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the O.P. 2: : Mr. Nagendra Upadhyay, Advocate. ----------- 3 19.03.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner challenges the revisional order dated 29.6.2006 by learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-I Supaul in Cr. Revision no. 106 of 2005 (Jyotish Kumar Choudhary versus The State of Bihar & Ors). An application on behalf of opposite party nos. 2 and 3 (minor daughter and son of the present petitioner) was filed in the court below seeking maintenance. On consideration of the material(s) on record, the said application was allowed and the present petitioner was directed to pay a sum of Rs. one thousand each to the two applicants namely Pooja Kumari and Pankaj Kumar for their maintenance and educational expenditures/development from the date of filing the application seeking interim maintenance. The petitioner assailed the aforesaid order before the learned revisional court. By the impugned order, the learned revisional court on consideration of 2 the entire aspects of the matter modified the aforesaid order by reducing the amount of interim maintenance from Rs. 1,000/- per month per child to Rs. 750/- per month per child. It would thus appear that substantial relief has already been granted to the petitioner. This court finds no merit in the application. It is accordingly dismissed. The trial court shall ensure that the order is implemented in its letter and spirit. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )