IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 506 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ BHAVENDUKUMAR DILIPBHAI OZA Versus VIJAYBHAI RASIKBHAI VACHHRAJANI DECD THRO HEIRS -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Civil Revision Application No. 506 of 2000 MR OZA FOR NANAVATY ADVOCATES for Petitioner MR MS SHAH for Respondent .......... for Respondent No. 1/1-1/3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA Date of decision: 24/07/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT Learned advocate for the petitioner, Mr.B.K.Oza for Nanavaty Advocates is present along with petitioner, Bhavendukumar Dilipbhai Oza. Learned advocate for the respondent, Mr.M.S.Shah is also present. 2. The petitioner has submitted purshis through his advocate which is signed by him as well as his learned advocate stating that he is withdrawing this Civil Revision Application with a request to grant him time upto 31st December, 2003 to vacate the premises in question upon his as well as his other members filing undertaking before this Court, which has been signed by the learned advocate for the otherside also. Petitioner has also submitted an undertaking affirmed by him today before a Notary. Purshis and undertaking submitted by the petitioner are ordered to be taken on record. 3. In view of the above facts and circumstances, this Civil Revision Application stands disposed of as withdrawn with a direction that the petitioner shall hand over vacant and peaceful possession of the disputed premises to the respondent on or before 31st December, 2003. He is further directed to file the undertaking of his other members within four weeks from today. Rule is discharged. (R.P.DHOLAKIA,J.) radhan/