IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 12TH AUGUST 2010 / 21ST SRAVANA 1932 RP.No. 346 of 2008 IN W.P.(C) No.33078 of 2006-K -------------------------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.33078/2006 Dated 19/02/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER: ------------------------------------------------------ SAJI, S/O.KARUNAKARAN, ASARIPARAMBIL HOUSE, AYMANAM P.O. KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHAN V.NAIR SRI.TOMY SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, TRIVANDRUM. 2. TAHASILDAR, DEVIKULAM TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 3. DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, DEVIKULAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 4. RANGE OFFICER, MARAYUR, MARAYUR VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R1 TO R4 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH , J. ------------------------------------------------------ R.P.No.346 of 2008 in W.P.(C) No.33078 of 2006-K ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 12th day of August, 2010 O R D E R This Court by the judgment under review had relegated the petitioner to prefer appeal against Ext.P13 before the appellate authority and further directed that a decision shall be taken therein. There was also a direction to the District Collector to conclude the enquiry pending before him within three months from the date of receipt of copy of the judgment. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the fact that after the filing of the review petition the District Collector has by order dated 22.3.2010 disposed of the petition in favour of the DFO and taken the view that the claim of the petitioner over the land in question does not exist. In the light of this development, the Review Petition is dismissed. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. MS