IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2011 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 10223 of 2011(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SABU.T.V., PART-TIME SWEEPER, SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVESITY OF SANSKRIT, KALADY, PIN:683 574, RESIDING AT THANATHAN HOUSE, KALADY-683 574. BY ADV. SRI.A.G.BASIL RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. SREE SANAKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, KALADY-683 574, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, SREE SANAKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, KALADY-683 574. 3. DIRECTOR, SREE SANAKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, REGIONAL CENTRE, PAYYANNUR, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN:670 327. SRI.P.K.VIJAYAMOHANAN SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.10223 OF 2011-C --------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 31st DAY OF MARCH, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Part Time Sweeper who is aggrieved by Exhibit P5 order whereby he is directed to join the Regional Centre of the University at Payyannur. It is submitted that the petitioner, after serving for some time in the University, was granted leave without allowance as per Exhibit P3 order. On 8.3.2011, he approached the 1st respondent-University requesting the University to allow him to rejoin duty after cancelling the unavailed portion of leave without allowance, as per Exhibit P4. Exhibit P5 order is passed apparently depriving the same. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that being a Part Time Sweeper, the petitioner will not be able to survive in the present station to which he is transferred with the meagre salary he is getting. It is pointed out that there are other vacancies for accommodating the petitioner. 3. The learned Standing Counsel for the University submitted that the petitioner had applied for leave without W.P.(C).No.10223/11 -:2:- allowance before the completion of the period of probation and therefore he will have to join the centre wherein there is a vacancy. 4. I am not pronouncing anything on the merits of the matter, since Exhibit P6 representation is pending before the Vice Chancellor. There will be a direction to the Vice Chancellor of the University to consider Exhibit P6 and pass appropriate orders within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The implementation of Exhibit P5 order will be kept in abeyance till orders are passed by the University. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn