IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1258 (SS) of 2011 Jagdish Chandra Tewari …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents Mr. Vinod Tiwari, learned counsel present for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned standing counsel present for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. Vinod Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned standing counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. The petitioner is a “Shiksha Mitra”. He states that he is eligible to undergo a training known as “Diploma in Learning Education”. According to the petitioner, he has been denied to undergo such training on the ground that he had earlier filed a writ petition bearing writ petition no. 561 (SS) of 2009, which is still pending. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the aforesaid pending writ petition does not pertain to the same issue and the petitioner has wrongly been denied opportunity to fill the form of the Diploma in Learning Education. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that if the petitioner moves a representation before the Principal, D.I.E.T., Almora, the same shall be decided by him after taking into consideration the fact that in case the petitioner is otherwise eligible to fill this form, he shall be allowed to fill up this form without further delay. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of finally. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) Dated: 19.09.2011 VKG