'tEJB"!" ^•-^^ .,. .^.••^-:^'^"""^...-"' ^:^s^::--"""" N1^1 |F PF'IIP' £=tsfa. S^ Sk*A '6-, iy? ^-? 'y^.-'- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH_AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. ^^.....OF 2006 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Ku Manju Devi Shrivas D/o- Shri Satruhan lal Shrivas Aged about 25 years R/o.- Daupura Mungeli District - Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS / 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Panchayat Ss Social Welfare Deptt. DKS Bhawan, Raipur /' 2) The Collector Bilaspur Distt- Bilaspur. .3) Janpad Panchayat MungeU through Chief Executive Officer Mungeli Distt- Bilaspur. 7 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. "T.. fe XI-HC—78 SfII^I ^iT ft-fi'k WII SV^lf Stltfill ~^- Df- T WHW S(»*)|th 3^ '^iiqiciq, ®-a1u'ito,fadiyy ..^•.J:...N.Q.....3..-3.:?./.o.6Wt. 200 an^?r 'qiW (yit^'iyi) TOiiw^ftaan^r S.B: Hon'ble Justice Mr. PritlnkerDiwaker tor 29-06-2009: ShriSameer Sahu, cour|sel Shri Shashank Thakur, Shri Arun Sao, counsel After arguing at length,| seeks permission to withdraw the petition, petitioner has l^rmi. Shri Sahu further subrrlits to file afresh, in case the caus4 Permission granted. With the above liberty,! withdrawn. bjeen 4ii<yTdt^;? w^v^^^S Tt^R^R ^siftnaiitsT sel for the petitioner. >.L for State/respondents No.1 & 2. respondent No. 3. learned counsel for the petitioner |he present petition as after filing of again appointed as Shiksha ttiat liberty may be given to him still survives. the writ petition is dismissed as Sd/- Pritmker Diwaker Judge r"