IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 15158 of 2008. Decided on: 07.07.2010. __________________________________________________________ Swaroop Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Petitioner was promoted to the post in question in the year 2008. His only grouse is that his case was required to be considered from the date the persons junior to him were considered for promotion to the post of Senior Assistant. 2. Consequently, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Senior Assistant from the date his juniors were promoted, if every thing is being equal. 3. In view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. July 07, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?