IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.827 of 2008 Vijay Kumar Singh, son of Sri Harihar Singh, resident of village- Chak Faridabad, P.O. Rasalpur, P.S. Jandaha, District- Vaishali. ...... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, I.A.S., Secretary, Secondary, Primary and Adult Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. Pratima Verma, I.A.S., District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, District- Vaishali. 4. Sri Nasim Ahmad, the District Superintendent of Education, Vaishali at hajipur, District- Vaishali (Hajipur). 5. Smt. Senh Lata, the Block Education Extension Officer, Jandaha-2, District Vaishali at Hajipur. 6. Sri Umesh Ram, the Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Rasalpur Purushottam, Jandaha-2, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. 7. The Headmaster, Sri Ram Prasad Singh, Rajkiya Madhya Vidyalaya, Rasalpur, Jandaha, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. 8. Sri Raju Baitha, Mukhiya-cum- Secretary, Sukh-Suvidha Committee, Gram Panchayat Raj, Rasalpur Purushottam, Jandaha-2, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. 9. Sri Dipu Kumar, the Block Development Officer, Jandaha, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. ... Opposite Parties. ----------- 02- 18.02.2010 Heard Mr. Subodh Kumar Jha for the petitioner, and learned Assistant Counsel to Mr. Sunil Kumar Mandal, Standing Counsel No.15. This application under Article 215 of the Constitution of India, read with sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act has been filed by the petitioner of C.W.J.C. No.14552 of 2006 (Vijay Kumar Singh Vs. The State of Bihar and others), and alleges non-implementation of the order dated 17.9.2007(Annexure-1), whereby the writ petition was disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to submit an appropriate application before respondent no.9 therein which, if filed within a period of four weeks from the date of the order, shall be disposed of by a reasoned order and in accordance with 2 law within a period of four weeks thereafter. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order in question has been complied and the petitioner’s representation has been allowed. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw this application. In that view of the matter, as prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioner, this application is disposed of. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/