1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 4 OF 2011 (Suresh Shankarrao Waghmare ..vs.. S.M. Haste, Jt. Director, Vocation Education and Training Regional Office and another) =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- None for the petitioner, Shri S.J. Jichkar, A.P.P. for the respondents. C ORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND S.B.DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED : 06-09-2011 It appears that originally this petition was filed as a contempt and was listed before the Single Judge of this Court. The Single Judge of this Court by order dated 22-3-2011 directed that this petition be placed before the Division Bench as the statement of the contemnor would amount to an offence punishable under Section 2(c)(i) of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971. Accordingly, this petition was placed before the Division Bench of this Court. It appears that the Registry had raised an objection that second set of the petition along with annexures had not been supplied by the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The matter was, therefore, listed before the Division Bench and the Division Bench adjourned the matter to 29-7-2011, observing that none was present for the petitioner. 2 This petition was again listed before the Division Bench of this Court on 29-7-2011 and the learned Counsel for the petitioner agreed to remove the objections. The Division Bench of this Court, therefore, directed that the objections be removed within two weeks and for placing the matter for admission before the Division Bench. The note of the Registry shows that the objections had not been removed and the second set remained to be filed. The matter was consequently listed before this Court on 22nd August, 2011. This Court also directed that the objections be removed within two weeks from the said date and granted last chance. The note of the Registry shows that the aforesaid objections has not been removed. This petition was called out in the morning in the first round and none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The to day after tomorrowmatter was, therefore, kept back and accordingly is called out again when the matter came on the second occasion, none appears on behalf of the petitioner. In that light of the fact that the learned Counsel for the petitioner has not supplied second set despite opportunities being granted by this Court, we are inclined to dismiss the contempt petition for want of prosecution. Contempt Petition is accordingly dismissed for default. JUDGE JUDGE. pma