IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-10663 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION : 18.07.2008 Kala .... PETITIONER Versus State of Haryana ..... RESPONDENT CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kadian, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajeev Kawatra, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana. * * * This is third petition filed by the petitioner for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 152 dated 29.8.2005 under Section 302/34 IPC and 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station City Rewari, District Rewari. His earlier petition (Crl. Misc. No. 49903-M of 2007) was dismissed by this Court, while making the following observations : “After hearing counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the role alleged to be played by the petitioner and the fact that out of 29 prosecution witnesses, 15 have already been examined, I am not inclined to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner at this stage. Dismissed. However, the trial court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months.” Crl. Misc. No. 10663-M of 2008 -2- Counsel for the respondent-State informs that in this case, out of 29 prosecution witnesses, 28 have been examined and the remaining one witness will be examined on July 26, 2008, the date fixed before the trial court. The trial court has already been directed to conclude the trial expeditiously. Keeping in view the aforesaid fact, at this stage, I do not find any fresh ground for the grant of bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. July 18, 2008 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE