IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr Misc No 40342 of 2008 HARE RAM KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.09.2008 While granting bail, by order dated 30.04.2008 in Cr Misc No 45747 of 2007, this Court had directed the petitioner to disclose to the trial Court the full and correct identity of the two co-accused as named by him so that the police may complete investigation in the matter. It was further ordered that if the police is unable to trace out the said co- accused, the Court shall make the note for future. Petitioner states that he had not made any such confessional statement before the police. He further states, now with reference to case diary, that even before the police, in his further examination, he has clearly stated that it is out fear, he named two fictitious persons as co-accused otherwise he does not know any such person. It is stated that because petitioner is unable to disclose the names as per orders of this Court, he is not being released on bail by the trial Court. Having considered the matter and having considered the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 15.04.2007, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in relation to Sonepur Rail Police Station Case No 22 of 2007 to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Sonepur without insisting on any further disclosure of names of co- accused. With this observation, the earlier order stands modified. 2 Let the order of this Court be communicated to the trial Court by FAX at the cost of the petitioner. M.E.H./ (Navaniti Prasad Singh)