1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.1879 OF 2010 Fule-Shahu-Ambedkar Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha, Balirampur, Tq. Dist. Nanded, through its President Shri Pandurang Sambhaji Engade, Age major, Occ.Social Service, R/o Balirampur, Tq. Dist.Nanded. ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra through Secretary School Education Department, Maharashtra, Mumbai. 2. The Deputy Director of Education, Railway Station Road, Aurangabad. 3. The Education Officer (Primary), Zillha Parishad, Nanded. ... Respondents. ... Mr.S.D.Dhongade, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.K.Kadam, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the State. ... CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 25.03.2010. 2 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per S.V.Gangapurwala,J.) 1. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to delete Respondent No.3. Leave to delete granted at the risk of the petitioner. 2. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission. 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking directions that the Respondents should accord recognition to the Primary School run by the petitioner and to extend all consequential benefits. It is brought to our notice that the proposal is filed by the petitioner on 12.5.2008 and the same has not yet been decided by the Respondents. In view of the fact that the proposal is still pending, we direct the Respondents to decide the said proposal on its own merits in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) months from 3 today. 4. Rule is made absolute in above terms with no order as to costs. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (P.V.HARDAS,J.) asp/office/wp187910