IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-31112 of 2011 Date of Decision : November 29, 2011 Atma Ram .... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Ms. Madhulika Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Gorakh Nath, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Senior DAG, Haryana. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Ram Singh, state that the petitioner has since been arrested, and therefore, the instant petition for anticipatory bail has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. November 29, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE