IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CC.G.) M.A. (0 No. ) &^4 Of2009 Ai?PELLANTS ^^ .^^f' .-•••".^lA^ ^•^•^ ~ ^! RESPONDENTS VERSUS ^",^' Smt. Mankunwar Sahu, W/o. Girdharilal Sahu aged about 53 years, Occupation- House Wife Girdharilal Sahu, S/o Mitthulal Sahu, aged about 55 years, Both R/o. Pahadi Chowk, Gudiyari, P.S. Gudiyari, Teh. & Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) B.R. Sahu, Owner of Motor Cycle, R/o. Pahadi para, Gudiyari, Raipur, Teh. & Distt. Raipur (C.G.) The New India Insurance Company Limited, Through- Divisional Manager, Division Office Kutcehri Chowk, 3ail Road, Raipur (C.G.) ^-" APPEAL UNDER_SECTION 173 OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT s<''—.M--S.*M*ia!U."<K>-u)l /fr^\ 11 HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH HCTI'BLE MR. T.P. SHARMA & HON'BLE MR. R. L. JHANWAR. JJ. M.A. (Cl No. 1044 Of 2009 1. Smt. Mankunwar Sahu, W/o Girdliarilal Sahu aged about 53 years, Occupation-House Wife 2. G-iidharilal Sahu, S/o Mitthulal Sahu, aged about 55 years, Both R/o Pahadi Chowk, Gudiyari, P.S. Gudiyari, Teh. & Distt. Raipur (Chliattisgarh), APPELLANTS VERSUS 1. 2. B.R. Sahu, Owner of Motor Cycle, R/o Pahadi para, Gudiyari, Raipur, Teh. & Distt. Raipur (C.G.). The New India Insurffiuce Company Limited, Through Divisional Manager, Division Of&ce Kutcehri Ch.owk, JaU Road, Raipur (C.G,). APPBAL UNDER SECTION 173 Of MOTOR VEHCELES ACT. ricscj.iL.- ^nn o.n.. ^juiiay AavocaLe lor Lne appeiiaiiLs. Shri Shailendra Sharma, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. None for the respondent No. 1. ORAL-JTJDGEMBNT (Passed on 38/07/2010( The foUowiag iudRiaent of fhe Court_was passed_bY T.P. 1. 2, Heard. This is a appeal agamst the award dated 14/11/08 passed by Second Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Raipur iu Claioi Case No. 57/2008 whereby fhe Claiiu petition of the appeUants have been disniissed on the ground that deceased himselfwas negUgent in driving. »-.) -^ ^...••s... "^ •-^, -^ ^SS^^%3", "''SSa.^.-sF''-1 L: 3. Learaed counsel for flie appeUants seeks to wifhdraw this appeal with Uberty aud permission to ffle appropriate appUcation for solatiuni ainount under Section 161 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. 4. Prayer is aUowed. 5. Consequently, this appeal is disniissed as withdrawn wifh aforesaid Uberty. Certified copy of fhe award impugned be returaed to fhe appellants after furaishing duly Photostat copy ofthe saine. 7. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge Sd/- R.L. Jhaiiwar Judge v