IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21055 of 2011 Rajendra Mahto @ Rajendra Mehta & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/- 20/07/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Out of ten petitioners, two petitioners, namely, Surajdeo Mahto and Kishore Mahto (petitioner nos. 4 & 7 respectively), as submitted, has already been apprehended. Hence, the prayer as regard to them stands infructous, consequently dismissed. Remaining eight petitioners are named accused in this case of altercation between the two villages and under almost similarly situated circumstance eight accused persons have already been granted the privilege by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.12.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33383 of 2010. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the petitioners, namely, Rajendra Mahto @ Rajendra Mehta, Ugrah Mahto, Nandeo Mahto, Birendra Mahto, Raghu Mahto, Rajendra Mahto, Santosh Mahto @ Santosh Mehta and Moti Mahto, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Obra P.S. Case No. 22 of 2009, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each 2 and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)