1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.03.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD).No.2866 of 2011 S.Kumaravel : Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief Internal Audit Officer, Board Office Audit Branch, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai 2. 2.Mrs.H.Sumathi, Assistant Audit Officer, Board Office Audit Branch, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Regional Office, Vilupuram Region, Vilupuram. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders on merits on the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 14.02.2011 for inclusion of his name in the panel of Junior Auditors and Auditors and for consequential promotion of the petitioner in the posts of Auditor and Assistant Audit Officer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board with effect from the date on which the petitioner's junior namely H.Sumathi, the second respondent herein was promoted. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul For Respondent No.1 : Mr.V.Kasinathan Standing Counsel O R D E R ********** Mr.V.Kasinathan, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice on behalf of the first respondent. In view of the limited order to be passed hereunder, I am not ordering notice to the second respondent. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders on merits on the representation submitted by him dated 14.02.2011 for inclusion of his name in the panel of Junior Auditors and Auditors and for his consequential promotion in the posts of Auditor and Assistant Audit Officer, Tamil Nadu Electricity https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Board with effect from the date on which, his junior, namely H.Sumathi, the second respondent herein was promoted. 3. The petitioner, seeking such relief, has approached the first respondent with a representation dated 14.02.2011. Since the same was not considered, he has come up with the present Writ Petition for the reliefs stated earlier. 4. Considering the limited scope of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the claim made by the petitioner, I direct the first respondent to consider and dispose of the said representation of the petitioner dated 14.02.2011 on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The Writ Petition stands ordered accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(LA) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To The Chief Internal Audit Officer, Board Office Audit Branch, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai 2. +1cc to Mr.A.Rahul Advocate, Sr.No.5891 ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD).No.2866 of 2011 Dated:- 11.03.2011 SML SMA/18.03.2011/3C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/