IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.82 of 2011 1. LALITA SINHA W/o Ram Kishore Prasad Sinha & 2. Ram Kishore Prasad Sinha son of Bindeshwari Lal Sinha Both resident of village- Siyani, P.S.-Kanda, District- Sheikhpura (Applicants in the Tribunal) …Appellants Versus THE UNION OF INDIA represented through the General Manager, East Railway, Kolkata (Respondent in Tribunal) …Respondent ----------- For the appellants : Mr. Anant Kumar, Advocate For the respondent : Mr. Anil Singh, Advocate ---------- 3/ 10.03.2011 Heard the parties. The appellants are aggrieved with the judgment and order dated 30.06.2009 passed in OA00214 of 2004 by which the Railway Claims Tribunal, Patna Bench, has refused compensation to the appellants for the alleged accidental death of son of the appellants. On going through the judgment impugned, I find that the Tribunal has disbelieved the factum of occurrence for two reasons i.e. no information was given within the jurisdiction where the accident took place and the matter was reported twelve days later at the Patna Medical College & Hospital, Patna, after the death had occurred. The second reason for disbelieving the occurrence is that there was no record before the railway authorities to indicate that the accident had taken place at the time and place as alleged. Since the judgment is well reasoned and substantially justified, I do not find any merit in the appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)