IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4140/2008 Kashiram Thakre ..vs.. Udaram Thakre ================================= CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE:23.10.2008 Heard. The lower appellate court has refused to interfere in M.C.A. after noticing that the dispute about the sale deed raised by petitioner did not appear to be prima facie correct in view of the execution of the will deed on very same date. However, while so doing on 15.7.2008, the lower appellate court expedited civil suit and directed its decision within 6 month. Period of 3 months has already expired after that order. As the suit is expedited and issue is prima facie considered, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter in writ jurisdiction. Advocate Kshirsagar has tried to contend that affidavit at page 66 with writ petition was on record, but then lower appellate court has erroneously found that there is no such document on record. As the period of more than 3 months has already expired and suit is expedited in view of application of mind, mentioned above by the lower appellate court, there is no need to consider the issue in limited jurisdiction at this stage. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. No cost. JUDGE smp.