1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No.9314 of 2004 Mr.Dagadu Tukaram Kamble Petitioner Vs. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Solapur & ors. Respondents Ms.Seema Sarnaik for petitioner. Mr.Nitin Jamdar for resp.nos.1 & 2. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. November 27, 2007. P.C. . Heard Ms.Sarnaik, the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of process issued by the learned Judge of the Labour Court in a criminal complaint filed under Section 48 of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971 and the said order was successfully challenged in revision application under Section 44 of the said Act. In short the petitioner is praying for quashing of the order of the revision Court. The revision under Section 44 of the MRTU and PULP Act has to be treated on par with the revision under Section 397 of Cr.P.C., in the instant case and consequently the petition would lie on the criminal 2 side. . Hence the petition be listed before an appropriate single bench on the criminal side. (B.H.MARL