IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH L.P.A. No. 29 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.8.2009 Ms. Avtar Bala ......Appellant Vs. The State of Haryana and others. ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY PRESENT: Mr.Shakti Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the appellanrt. **** ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. (Oral) 1. The appellant is aggrieved by the dismissal of writ petition against selection of private respondent as Headmistress of the school. The appellant also participated but was not selected. 2. Main point raised was that the Managing Committee was not duly approved by the Director of Education and the whole process was illegal. 3. Learned Single Judge held that there was dispute between two managing bodies which was subject-matter pending in C.W.P.No.11244 of 2000 and the appointment was made after following due procedure. Some arrangement had to be made pending decision of the dispute between the two rival claimants. There was no ground to set aside the appointment. L.P.A. No. 29 of 2008 [2] 4. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant who reiterated the arguments raised before the learned Single Judge. 5. Admittedly, the appellant had participated in the selection process and was not selected. The private respondent has already been working for more than nine years. 6. We do not find any ground to interfere with the view taken by learned Single Judge. 7. The appeal is dismissed. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE (DAYA CHAUDHARY) August 11, 2009 JUDGE raghav L.P.A. No. 29 of 2008 [3]