IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.956 of 2009 1. PANKAJ KUMAR SHARMA SON OF SHRI CHANDRIKA SHARMA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BABHANAIA, POST PAHARPUR, POLICE STATION GARKHA, DISTRICT- CHAPRA. 2. AJAY KUMAR RAY SON OF SHRI BACHCHA RAY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHAMDA MANGAL TOLA, POLICE STATION GARKHA, DISTRICT- CHAPRA. 3. ROSHAN RAY SON OF LATE RAM NATH RAY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BABHANAIA, POST PAHARPUR, POLICE STATION GARKHA, DISTRICT- CHAPRA. 4. TARKESHWAR RAM SON OF HULAS RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DUMARI KUNAR, POST DUMRI, POLICE STATION KHAIRA, DISTRICT- CHAPRA. 5. RAJ KISHORE RAM SON OF LATE DHUPAN RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHAMDA, POLICE STATION GARKHA, DISTRICT- CHAPRA. 6. RIMA DEVI WIFE OF SHRI UMESH RAY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST MAHAMDA, POLICE STATION GARKHS, DISTRICT- CHAPRA. 7. LAXMAN SINGH SON OF RAM PRIT SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE + POST MAHAMDA, POLICE STATION GARKHA, DISTRICT- CHAPRA. 8. RAM NARESH PRESD GUPTA SON OF MAJOGI PRASAD GUPTA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HUSSE CHAPRA, POLICE STATION MUFASSIL, DISTRICT- CHAPRA. 9. SHIVDHAR RAY SON OF LATE GANGA RAY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MANGAL TOLA MAHAMDA, POLICE STATION GARKHA, DISTRICT- CHAPRA. 10. RAM EKBAL RAY SON OF LATE JANKI RAY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LADHPUR, POST GURUKUL MEHIAN, POLICE STATION GARKHA DISTRICT- CHAPRA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, CHAPRA. 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, CHAPRA. 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, GARKHA, CHAPRA. 5. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, GARKHA, CHAPRA. 6. THE INVESTIGATION OFFICER, GARKHA, POLICE STATION, CHAPRA. ----------- 4 28.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and 2 the State. The prayer of the petitioners is for quashing the Garkha P.S. Case No. 27/2009 registered on 27th February 2009, for the offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the allegations in the FIR to the effect that the appointment of two persons, namely, Ajay Kumar and Pankaj Kumar Sharma, was made as Siksha Mitra in the year 2003 by showing Ajay Kumar as a major and Pankaj Kumar, even though, was matriculate with second division, however, in the merit list he was shown to be the first division having 63% marks. Learned counsel submits that both the allegations are factually incorrect. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that these are the matters of investigation. Considering the rival submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. However, it goes without saying that the aforesaid Police Case be investigated expeditiously without unnecessary delay. The writ application stands disposed of. Amrendra/ (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)