IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14754 of 2010 GAYA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION . Versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ORS . For the Petitioner:- Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the N.C.T.E.:- Mr. S.N. Pathak, Advocate ----------- 02. 16.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the N.C.T.E. The petitioner institution applied for recognition. It is not in controversy as a matter of fact, that the application was deficient. Consequently, no inspection was even held and as alleged without opportunity to remove deficiencies, the application was rejected. The petitioner allegedly removed the deficiencies during the pendency of the appeal. The appeal has been rejected with the observation that the petitioner may apply afresh after removal of deficiency. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since no inspection was done in pursuance of the original application, the petitioner may not be required to redeposit a fresh inspection fee and the fee deposited earlier may be adjusted. Learned counsel for the N.C.T.E. relies upon Rule 12 of the Regulation, Norms and Standards that fresh inspection fee shall have to be deposited. 2 If the petitioner deposits the necessary fee and requests for inspection, the submission that deficiencies have been removed during the pendency of the appeal, the Court expects the N.C.T.E. to act fairly and reasonably in the matter and take a final decision after such inspection on the aspect of recognition in accordance with law preferably within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The application stands disposed. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)