1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 13 OF 2010 Nandkumar s/o Vitthal Ghumare & anr ..PETITIONERS VERSUS The Investigation Officer & ors. ..RESPONDENTS Mr A.N. Nagargoje, Advocate for the petitioners; Mr K.J. Ghute Patil, A.P.P. for respondents no.1 to 4. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, JJ. DATE : 24th February, 2010 PER COURT : Mr A.N. Nagargoje, learned Counsel for the petitioners, after arguing for some time states on instructions, that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition insofar as relief at prayer clause (A) and (D) is concerned with liberty to the petitioners to apply before the learned Magistrate at the time of framing of the charge in respect of disclosure of the offence punishable under section 395, 397 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. We accordingly dismiss this petition in respect of prayer clause (A) and (D) with the aforesaid liberty. In respect of prayer clause (B) and (C), the learned Counsel for the petitioners states on instructions that the petitioners do not press for the aforesaid reliefs. The 2 petition, therefore, stands dismissed as withdrawn in respect of prayer clause (B) and (C). In respect of prayer clause (E) to the petition, the learned Counsel for the petitioners states on instructions that the petitioners do not press for the relief at prayer clause (E) to this petition but pray for liberty to file appropriate proceedings for challenging the order dated 22.5.2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Patoda, District Beed accepting the report submitted by the respondent under section 169 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. We accordingly dismiss this petition in respect of prayer clause (E) to the petition with the aforesaid liberty. In the circumstances, there will be no order as to costs. ( SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) amj/criwp13.10