1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1121 OF 2011 Smt.Manik Moreshwar Jaokar Applicant versus Sadashiv N. Kadam and others Respondents Mrs.Sonal Parab i/by M/s.Rajeev Sawant and Associates for applicant. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP for State. CORAM : R.V.MORE, J. DATE : 2nd December 2011 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for State. The applicant is complainant in Criminal Case No.353/SS/2005 filed under sections 454, 455, 379 r/w 114 of Indian Penal Code. The complaint is at the stage of trial. An application filed by the applicant in Criminal Case No.353/SS/2005 for examining the bank manager as a witness came to be rejected by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 22nd Court, at Andheri vide order dated 8th March 2011. The said order came to be confirmed by the learned Appellate Court in Criminal Revision Application No.483 of 2011. Against that order the applicant has filed present revision application. 2. Learned advocate for the applicant states that to prove charge under section 454 of IPC, the Manager of the Bank is required to be examined. He further submits that the applicant wants to rely on the pass book entries to show the ownership of premises in question. The application is rejected by the Magistrate on the ground that Manager or the pass book of the bank will not prove the applicant's ownership to the said premises. The learned Appellate Court also confirmed the order of Magistrate. 2 3. The complaint made by the applicant is of criminal trespass. Certainly the version of Bank Manager and entries in the Pass Book of bank will not help the applicant to prove the ownership. I, therefore, do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned orders in my jurisdiction under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Hence, criminal application is rejected. (R.V.MORE, J.)