: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. Chamber Summons No.945 of 2005 Chamber Summons No.945 of 2005 Chamber Summons No.945 of 2005 In In In Admiralty Suit No.5 of 2004 Admiralty Suit No.5 of 2004 Admiralty Suit No.5 of 2004 Universal Capsules Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ...Plaintiffs. V/s. P & O Nedlloyds Ltd. & Ors. ...Defendants. And Maersk Line Ltd. ...Proposed Defendant Mr.Rahul Narichania i/b Vikrant Deshpande for the Plaintiffs. Ms.Jimi John i/b V.Subramanian for the Defendants No.1 and 2. CORAM: S.R.Sathe, J. CORAM: S.R.Sathe, J. CORAM: S.R.Sathe, J. DATE : 24th November, 2005. DATE : 24th November, 2005. DATE : 24th November, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Perused Affidavit. Heard the learned Advocates for the Plaintiffs and Defendants. 2. Amendment, that is being sought, is infact of formal nature and no prejudice is likely to be caused to other side. Moreover, the learned Advocate for the Plaintiff submitted that notice has been issued to the Proposed Defendant, however, he has not appeared. : 2 : Hence, amendment in terms of clause (a), (b) and (c) is allowed. Plaintiff to carry out amendment within four days. (S.R.Sathe,J.) (S.R.Sathe,J.) (S.R.Sathe,J.)