•-i HIGH COURTOFCHHATnSGARH. BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 7020 of201 PETITIONER Bhupendara Singh Chauhah, S/o Jaipal Singh Chauhan, aged about 50 years, Murrarpara Pendra Post/Tehsil Pendra, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Chhattisgarh Board of Secondary Education, Raipur , WRIT PETITIONUNDERARTIGI-E 226^27 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFWDIA ADbearance : Dr. ShaileshAhuja, Advocate fbr the petitioner. Mr. AjayDwivedi, Dy. Govt.Advocate for theSfate/respondent No.1. . il:, . \ .-' • ,' : •: •. ^ :: Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Adyocate with Mr. Pankaj Agrawal.Advocate fbr respohdentNo.2. ORALORDER (07.02.2011) SUNILKUMARSINHA. J. l-1eard finally with the consent of learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner's son Master Abhishek Singh Chouhan appeared in HigherSecondary 12 (10+2) examination, 2010. This examination was cohducted by responderit No.2/Board. The petitioner's son applied for revaluationof two papers namely Hindi and Chemistry. He was informed by the Board vide letter dated 27.8.2010 that 5 marks have been increased in Chemistry subject during the re-valuatiohof the said paper, however, it was intimated thatanswer-sheetof l-1indi subject was not traceable. The petitioner therefore filed this writ petition for necessary directions to the respondents regarding re-valuation of the answe^heet of Hindi paper of his son. Respondent No.2/Board of Secondary Education submitted reply that the answer-sheet of Hindi paper was hot W.P.CONo. 7020 of2010 traceable, therefore, it was not possible for the Bo^irdto^e6nduct re- valuation of the saidSpa^j. On th^gg|^ reply, this Courton 25.1.2011 directed that the Chairman of Board/respondent No.2 shall remain present on 7 February, 2011.It was also directed that ifthe required answer-sheetis traced, then simply information shallbe submitted to this Court and the Chairman will not be required to remairi present. Mr. Agrawal has filed I.A. No. 2/2011 informing that the answer- sheet of Hindi paper was traced and it was re-valuated and 10 marks were increased in Hindi paper and the same has been intimated to the son of the petitioner on 3.2.2011.A copy of the information dated 3.2.2011 (Annexure-Ato I.A. No. 2/2011)hasalso been filed. In this view ofthe matter, when e petitioner's main grievanGe is already redressed and answer-sheet of Hihdi paper of his son has alreacly been re-yalyated and 10 mark$ haye increased, 1 deem it appropriatet6dispQse;^thewFit;RietitjoniaMhi&stage. In viewoftheabove, thewritpetitisn isfinailydisposedot No orders asto cost. Sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge !<t•tt;!