IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13652 of 2011 1. Rajendra Singh, aged about 55 Years S/O Late Baijnath Singh R/O Vill.-Chainpur, Mubarakpur, Block And P.S. Siswan, Distt.-Siwan. 2. Sheoji Pandey, aged about 54 Years S/O Late Prbhu Ram Pandey R/O Vill.-Saraut, Block and P.S. Siswan, Distt.-Siwan. 3. Dinesh Kumar Pandey, aged about 51 Years S/O Parshuram Pandey R/O Vill.-Tarenwa, Block And P.S. Siswan, Distt.-Siwan. 4. Awadh Kishore Dubey, about 50 Years S/O Kamaldeo Dubey R/O Vill.-Noujapatti, Block and P.S. Siswan, Distt.-Siwan. 5. Ganesh Prasad, aged about 55 Years S/O Sitaram Prasad R/O Vill.- Ramgarh, Block & P.S. Siswan, Distt.-Siwan. 6. Chandeswar Manjhi, aged about 60 Years S/O Jai Manjhi R/O Vill.-Siswankala, Block And P.S. Siswan, Distt.-Siwan. 7. Ramji Singh, aged about 40 Years S/O Deodhari Singh R/O Vill.- Asar, Block And P.S. Siswan, Distt.-Siwan. 8. Jitendra Kumar Singh S/O Gautam Singh R/O Vill.-Bakhandi, Block and P.S. Siswan, Distt.-Siwan. 9. Umesh Prasad Singh, aged about 55 Years S/O Bacha Singh R/O Vill.-Nirkhapur, Block and P.S. Siswan, Distt.-Siwan. 10. Ramnath Singh, 55 Years S/O Late Jaleshwar Singh R/O Vill.- Babandih Tole Bangra, Block and P.S. Siswan, Distt.-Siwan. 11. Chandrika Lal Sharma, aged about 55 Years S/O Late Dhama Sharma R/O Vill.-Ghurghat, Block & P.S. Siswan, Distt.-Siwan. 12. Prabhunath Shahi, aged about 42 Years S/O Rajendra Shahi R/O Vill.-Pandgari, Block and P.S. Siswan, Distt.-Siwan. 13. Om Prakash Rai, aged about 42 About S/O Late Dharmnath Rai R/O Vill.-Kishunbari, Block and P.S. Siswan, Distt.-Siwan. 14. Kamleshwar Mishra, aged about 62 Years S/O Dhramnath Mishra R/O Vill.-Kachnar, Block and P.S. Siswan, Distt.-Siwan. 15. Dilip Singh, Aged about 42 Years S/O Baliram Singh R/O Vill.- Subahi, Block & P.S. Siswan, Distt.-Siwan. 16. Rama Shankar Prasad, aged about 60 Years S/O Late Basudeo Prasad R/O Vill.-Gangpur Siswan, Block & P.S. Siswan, Distt.- Siwan. 17. Abdul Rahman, aged about 40 Years S/O Abdul Gafoor R/O Vill.- Shekhpura, Block & P.S. Siswan, Distt.-Siwan. 18. Rajmangal Singh, aged about 62 Years S/O Late Bankey Singh R/O Vill.-Bhikhpur, Bhagwanpur, Block & P.S. Siswan, Distt.- Siwan. 19. Dilip Kumar Sah, aged about 38 Years S/O Jawahar Lal Sah R/O Vill.-Hussaina Bangara, Block and P.S. Siswan, Distt.-Siwan. . . . . . . Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The District Magistrate, Siwan. 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Siwan. 4. The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Patna. 5. The Block Development Officer, Siswan, P.S. Siswan, Distt.- Siwan. . . . . . Respondents. 2 ---------------------------------- 2/ 12.09.2011 All the 19 petitioners, who are the licensee under the 1984 Unification Order as well as under the Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2001 pray for quashing the order dated 05.07.2011 issued by the Deputy Development Commissioner, Siwan (Respondent no.2), directing them to refund of value of undistributed rice under 50 % and 30 % of Sampurna Gramin Rojgar Yojana in between the years 2004-2005 at APL rate of Rs.13.70 per Kg. The petitioner submits that way back in the year 2008 they wanted to return the undistributed rice allotted to them. In this respect, petitioners refer to representation dated 16.01.2008 (Annexure-2). Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would also govern the instant writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as 3 mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioners would either deposit 15% of the value of undistributed rice at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within two months. This order would not come in the way of petitioners, if they want to deposit the value of rice or rice itself in excess of 15%. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)