1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3066 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO.3066 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO.3066 OF 2003 Shri Ramesh Baburao Sainder & Anr. .. Petitioners. vs. Shri Machindra Nivrutti Gorde. .. Respondent . Mr. P.N. Joshi for petitioners. Mr. G.S. Godbole for respondent. CORAM : A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM : A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM : A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 6th November, 2006. DATE : 6th November, 2006. DATE : 6th November, 2006. P.C. . The respondent instituted a suit for injunction and along with the plaint filed an application seeking temporary injunction to restrain the present petitioner from using the approach lane. The trial Court rejected the application and aggrieved thereby the respondent preferred a Miscellaneous Civil Appeal. The First Appellate Court has allowed the application and granted interim injunction as prayed for. Aggrieved thereby, this writ petition came to be filed in the year 2003. For the last three years there is no interim order operating and the order passed by the 2 First Appellate Court holds the field. 2. Perused the order. A plausible view of the matter is taken by the First Appellate Court which does not call for any interference. Even otherwise, in my opinion, ends of justice would be met by directing the trial court to decide the suit expeditiously and as far as possible within a period of six months from today. In the result, the writ petition is summarily rejected. The trial Court is directed to expeditiously decide the suit and I expect a decision within a period of six months from today. (A.P. Deshpande, J.) (A.P. Deshpande, J.) (A.P. Deshpande, J.)