IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8673 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 12, 2010. Subhash Chander and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.K.Arya, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Kamaldeep Singh Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. Notice of motion. Mr.Kamaldeep Singh Sidhu, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of the order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to seek any counter-reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioners seek a mandamus directing the respondents to consider their case as per their merit in view of the order dated 18.3.2010 passed by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.11111 of 2009 (Parminder Kaur versus State of Punjab and others). C.W.P.No .8673 of 2010 2 I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. The controversy involved in this case has already been settled by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.11111 of 2009 (Parminder Kaur versus State of Punjab and others), decided on 18.3.2010. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the aforesaid Parminder Kaur's case (supra). Dasti. May 12, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE