IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 16193 of 2010 Date of Decision: 9.9.2010. Roshni Devi --Petitioner Versus U.H.B.V.N. & others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. S.K. Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate present in the Court has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. Husband of the petitioner namely Sh. Baljit Singh was appointed on the post of Shift Attendant on regular basis on 16.4.1979. He was promoted as A.S.S.A and S.S.A. He expired on 17.11.2006. The grievance of the petitioner is that retiral benefits of her deceased husband have not been paid to her despite Govt. Instructions dated 1.8.2006 (Annexure P-1). Petitioner served a legal notice (Annexure P-7) in this respect but no decision has been taken thereon till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the legal notice served by the petitioner, referred to above. CWP. No. 16193 of 2010 -2- In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take decision on the legal notice served by the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 9.9.2010. lucky