{‘0 HIGH 006R? a? C§IHAT?§$G xR§i fin? 3ILA$§9UR ?ETiTiGNER WRIT §ET§?§®N §\§@. 2WW2€W6 Rajkumar Sahu, Aged about 25 years, 3/0 Tek!a§ Sahu, Rfo V§Elage Ganiya, Tahsil Navagarh, DiSiriCi Durg(C.G.) V5. RE$PONDENT$ 1 Siaie of Chhai'tisgarh,‘ Threugh: Secretary, Tribai Weifai'e Separiment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur {c.G.) Collecior, Dantew’ada, Dismct Dakshén Bastar, Dantew'ada (CG) Direcmr, Panchaya’i amd Gramin Vikas Vibhag, Chhatt§sgarh, Raépur, District Raipur (C.G.} Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bhairamgiarh, D§strict Daniewada (C.G.) Biock Educatim Officer, Jaripad Panchayat, Bhairamgarh, District ,Dantewada (SQ) Chief Execuiive Officer, Z§§a Panchayat, Dantewada, District Damewada (OG‘) WK? PEiiTiQN UNDER ikRTEGLE 22$i22? 6F 'i‘HE Q$N$HTUH6§§ OF iNDiA .ii‘epiaearemce: Shri Mano} Paranjpe, Counsei for the peiiiioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panei Lawyer for the $tate/r3sp0ndants No.1 ,2, 3 & 5. 0mg. GRgEg {92.94.2999i SUNIE. KUWW SiNHii! J. Hearci The petitioner has chalienged the impugned order daied 3m .2005 (Annexure P/g) passed by respondent No.5, Whéreby, the Officer Inchai‘ge of ihe concerned insi‘iiu‘tion has been directeoi i . WE No.2197/2006 that‘ the order dated 20.1(12005 (Annexure PIE) passed by the Jarwpad Panchayat, Bhairamgarh appointing Shiksha Karmi, Grade- lil, be not given effeci to without the permi‘ssion of the District Coitector, Dantewada. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that aimost simiiariy pieced petitioner has aiso fiied another Writ Petition bearing No.1223l2006 and the same was dieposed of by order dated 25th March 2006 (Annexure P42), therefore, this petition may aiso be disposed of in terms of the order dated 25th March 200‘s passed in the said writ petition, because, here also, the petitioher has made a representation (Annexure PM 1), which is pending for its disposai. The aforesaid prayer is not opposed by teamed counsei tor ,the State. The eariier writ petition was disposed of in terms of the foiiowing order: “6. Having heard teamed counsel for the parties, in the facts and circumstances 0t the case, the respondents are directed to consider and deeide the representation (Annexure Pit t), in accordance with taw, within a period of three weeks, from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order." With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is s disposed of in terms of the order dated 25th March 2006 passed in W.P.i\io.1223/2GG6 and the respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation (Annexure Pitt) in accordance with law within-a period of 3 weeks from the date of receiptfproduction of the copy of this order. The petition stands tinaiiy disposed of. Accordingiy, M.{W.)P.No.1 673/2006 atso stands disposed. i J45 Sd/— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge