IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.7072 of 2010 Date of Order: 2.2.2011 Hari Om and another .....Petitioners Vs. Shyam Sunder and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr. Gautam Kailey, Advocate for Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Sanjay Vij, Advocate for respondent No.1- plaintiff. JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL) Grievance of the petitioners in the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is against the order dated 22.9.2010 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Divn.), Gurgaon whereby their application for amendment of written statement has been dismissed. Learned counsel for respondent No.1-plaintiff points out that after filing of the present revision petition, learned trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 17.11.2010 has passed preliminary decree of partition against which the petitioners have filed an appeal and, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous. Proxy counsel appearing for respondent No.1-plaintiff is unable to refute the aforesaid contention. Dismissed as infructuous. February 02, 2011 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE