1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 8 OF 2007 Manubhai Paragji Vashi ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Santosh Narawade i/b. M.P.Vashi & Associates for the petitioner. Mr. Ravi Kada, Advocate General with Mr. K.R.Belosey, Addl.Govt. Pleader for respondent No.1. Mr. Jai Karade i/b. G.S.Godbole, Advocates, for respondent No.2. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 21st January, 2010. P.C. 1. Insofar as prayer (a) of this petition is concerned, the High Court has already filed an affidavit before the Supreme Court in terms of the Judgment in Jamshed Gajdhar’s case. The transfer of jurisdiction to the City Civil Court is now seized of by the Supreme Court. In these circumstances, insofar as that prayer clause is concerned, it will not be possible for this Court to grant any further relief. 2. Learned Counsel refers to prayer clause (c) which is to enhance the 2 jurisdiction of the Small Cause Court upto Rs.25,000/-. This is purely a legislative function. Such relief cannot be granted by this Court as no mandamus can lie. It will be open to the petitioner to pursue the matter with the appropriate authorities. 3. Considering the above, in our opinion, nothing further survives in this petition which is accordingly disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)