hvn 907//appln//2174.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2174 OF 2010 Baburaj Kanakappan and Ors. ... Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ... Respondents Mr.A.H.H.Ponda, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. Rajesh More, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 P.C. Heard finally. This is petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking quashment of process for offence under section 465 Cr.P.C. so confirmed by the revisional court in Revision Application No. 1029 of 2009 dated 20.2.2010. The order of the revisional court, does not inform of any primary illegality to appreciation of the facts. 1 hvn 907//appln//2174.10 Several issues touching the affairs of the society, filling of M-20 form, resolution, draft resolution are argued. The controversy culminates to a short question in respect of issuance of letter by the authorities of Cooperative department to open a bank account when there was no such power and competence with the accused/applicants as the office bearers of the society to do. The office of the Cooperative department had confirmed that such letter without date and no outward number has not been issued by their office even if it bears signature of Deputy Registrar. The resolution to which reference is made by the accused/applicant itself is in cloud. The ego fights between two fractions of the office bearers of the society is primarily indicated in the complaint. Consequently at this stage, it cannot be said that no case is made out for proceeding against the accused for offence under section 465 I.P.C. Petition lacks merit. Dismissed. Heard. The stay granted earlier is extended for the further period of eight weeks. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) 2