IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2007 / 18TH PAUSHA 1928 WP(C).No. 33405 of 2006(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- MARY, AGED 47 YEARS, W/O.K.P.PAUL, KANNAMPILLY HOUSE, IMURY KARA, KOOVAPPADY P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.K.SAJEEV SRI.M.V.JOY RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE PRINCIPAL, MAR ELIAS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KOTTAPPADY P.O., KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, EDAPPILLY, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.J.MATHEW R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. M.R. SREELATHA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC. 33405/2006. APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT. P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE DISCHARGE SUMMARY ISSUED FROM THE HOSPITAL. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE DATED 29.11.2006 IS ALSO ISSUED FROM THE HOSPITAL. EXT. P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 13.12.2006. EXT. P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE ATTENDANCE REGISTER CONTAINED THE REMOVAL ORDER DATED 30.11.2006. EXT. P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR READMISSION DATED 2.1.2007. RESPONDENTS' EXTS: EXT. R1 : TRUE COPIES OF THE RELVANT PAGES OF THE ATTENDANCE REGISTER. EXT. R1(a) : TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN ASSURANCE DATED 9.10.2006. EXT. R1(b) : TRUE COPY OF THE PROGRESS CARD OF THE PETITIONER'S SON FOR THE CURRENT ACADEMIC YEAR. K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No.33405 OF 2006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of January, 2007 JUDGMENT Petitioner had approached this court against the removal of the petitioner's minor son for continuous absence for more than 15 days. Thereafter an application was moved for readmitting the student and it is submitted today by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent that the son of the petitioner has been readmitted. In the light of this no further orders are necessary. Counsel for the first respondent submits that it should be made clear that it is open to the first respondent to take action if there is any act of indiscipline. Needless to say, it is open to the first respondent to invoke the powers available under law, if such a situation arises. The writ petition is closed as above. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb K.M.JOSEPH, JJ. - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A. No. OF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT Dated this the day of February, 2006.