IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9828 of 2010 Md. Kuttubuddin, Son of Late Jamaluddin, resident of Village- Shadipur, Police Station- Chandauti, District-Gaya……………….………Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Collector, Gaya. 3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar Gaya. 4. The District Supply Officer, Gaya. 5. The Block Supply Officer, Sadar Gaya…………………Respondents. 2. 23.12.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner’s license has been cancelled by the Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar Gaya, for the reasons as mentioned in Annexure-1 vide Memo No. 69 dated 27.01.2010. The petitioner is said to have filed his reply to show cause issued to him. The order impugned does not indicate any good reason for rejecting the show cause. The enquiry report also does not disclose what are the anomalies committed by the petitioner. There are no supporting documents which would indicate that petitioner received Kerosene Oil and sold it on a higher rate, that he had not distributed the food grains for the month of July, 2009, and that he has not 2 distributed the food grains to Red Card holders. Without conducting any enquiry, examining documents and the stock register, the impugned order has been passed. I, accordingly, remand the matter back to the Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar Gaya, who will conduct proper enquiry and thereafter pass appropriate order. The petitioner would have liberty to bring on record any such document in support of his claim that he has distributed the ration according to the provisions of the license. Copy of the petition alongwith the documents has to be filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks on receipt/production of a copy of this order before the Sub Divisional Officer Sadar, Gaya. Anexure-3 is quashed till final disposal of the petition of the petitioner. With the aforesaid observation and direction the writ petition is disposed of. U. K. ( Sheema Ali Khan, J)