1 wp-4200.00 Ash IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4200 OF 2000 Ganpat Dashrath Gholave, since deceased through legal heirs:- 1. Murlidhar Ganpat Gholave & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs Shivaji Baburao Rajebhosale & Others. .. Respondents -- Shri P.B. Shah for the Petitioners. Shri Surel S. Shah for Respondent Nos.2, 4A, 4D and and 4E. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 29TH NOVEMBER, 2010 P.C.: Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners and learned counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 2, 4A, 4D and 4E. None appears for the 1st Respondent who is contesting Respondent. 2. By the order impugned, the State Government has rejected the revision application preferred by the Petitioners under Section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The challenge in the revision application was to the orders passed by the Additional Commissioner in Cross Revision Applications. It was 2 wp-4200.00 held under the impugned order that the 2nd revision application was not maintainable. 3. A decision of this Court in the case of Gurudassing Nawoosing Panjwani Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Others ( Letters patent Appeal No. 55 of 2003 ) holds that the second revision application under Section 257 of the said Code against the order passed by the Divisional Commissioner in a revision application under Section 257 of the said Code is maintainable in law. 4. Hence, the impugned order will have to be quashed and set aside only on the ground that the revision application preferred by the Petitioner was maintainable. Accordingly, the Petitions are disposed of by passing the following order. ORDER (a) The impugned order is quashed and set aside and the revision application preferred by the Petitioners before the State Government is restored. It is held that the revision application is maintainable. (b) Revision application shall be decided as 3 wp-4200.00 expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the date on which an authenticated copy of this order is produced. (c) Ad-interim relief granted on 16th August, 2000 will continue to operate till the disposal of the revision application. The Revision application to be decided without being influenced by grant of interim relief. (d) All contentions of the parties on merits of the revision application is kept open. (A.S.OKA, J)