IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2009 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 9776 of 2009(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SUMA, JOSEVILLA, KUREEPUZHA CHERI, THRIKKADAVOOR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.PRATHEESH.P RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 2. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, L.A.(.N.H), KOLLAM. GOVT. PLEADER SMT. K.R. DEEPA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 9776 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 26th March, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed an application under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act for enhanced compensation for the property acquired by her on the basis of an award in LAR No. 122/2000, which, according to the petitioner, is in respect of a property similarly situated and acquired under the same notification. Ext. P3 is the order passed by the 2nd respondent in that petition. The petitioner challenges the same. I am of opinion that if the petitioner is aggrieved by Ext. P3, the petitioner's remedy lies in filing an application under Section 28A(3) of the Land Acquisiton Act for reference to the court. Therefore, without prejudice to that right, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.