IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER TUESDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2008 / 24TH ASHADHA 1930 W.A.No. 1476 of 2008 ------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.17336/2007 DATED 09/06/2008 .................... APPELLANT/4TH RESPONDENT: ---------------------------------------------- E.NARAYANAN, CHAIRMAN (WRONGLY DESCRIBED IN THE CAUSE TITLE OF THE WP(C) AS MANAGING COMMITTEE MEMBER), STATE CO-OPERATIVE UNION, KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3, 5 & 6: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.S.ANIL, KOMALAZHIKATHU HOUSE, MANNADY, ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. CASHEW EMPLOYEES WELFARE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO.P.T.200, ADOOR, REPRESENTED BY ITS HONORARY SECRETARY. 3. STATE CO-OPERATIVE UNION, KERALA TRIVANDRUM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY/ ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, TRIVANDRUM. 4. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (G) PATHANAMTHITTA. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, CO-OPERATION (C) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. ADOOR URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. R1 BY ADV.SRI.P.P.JACOB R2 BY ADV.SRI.V.SETHUNATH R3 TO R5 BY SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.A.G.ANEETHA R6 BY ADV. SRI.JACOB P.ALEX THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & A.K.BASHEER, J. ------------------------------------------- W.A.No.1476 of 2008 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 15th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. Fourth respondent in the writ petition is the appellant in this writ appeal. He calls in question certain observations made by the learned Single Judge while disposing of W.P.(C) No.17336 of 2007 dated 9th June, 2008. 2. The 4th respondent is elected as the Chairman of the State Co-operative Union, Kerala which is the third respondent in the writ appeal. That appointment is made pursuant to the so-called request of the petitioner for acceptance of his oral resignation. The appointment of the 4th respondent as the Chairman of the third respondent State Co-operative Union is not disturbed by the learned Single Judge while passing the impugned order. Therefore, it cannot be said that the appellant is in any way aggrieved by the observations made by the learned Single Judge while disposing of the writ petition. 3. In that view of the matter, we decline to entertain this writ appeal. Accordingly, the writ appeal requires to be rejected and it is W.A.No.1476 of 2008 2 rejected. It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the orders passed by the learned Single Judge. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (A.K.BASHEER) JUDGE vns