IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ No.144 of 2011 Ramdeo Jha Versus The State Of Bihar And Ors. ---------------------------------- 6/ 30/11/2011 Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Vigilance and kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel representing the Vigilance. Also gone through the averments made in the counter affidavit more particularly paragraph-7 whereupon much stress has been given by the learned counsel for the Vigilance. It has been submitted on behalf of the Vigilance that as the village in question still remains inundated therefore, it is not feasible for them to record the statement of witnesses for the present but assured and virtually undertook to have the statement of the witnesses recorded in the month of January 2011. The instant writ has been filed for having the enquiry completed at an earliest so that prosecution case should ensue. The Court at least should pose its belief 2 upon the undertaking, more, so far present case is concerned there happens to be no contradictory statement at the end of petitioner to discredit para-7 of the counter affidavit. Expecting that the matter will be concluded by 29th of February 2012, giving one month more time to the Vigilance, the instant petition is disposed of. However, if the Vigilance fails in putting standby to its undertaking, certainly will be accountable for duping the Court. A copy of this order be served upon Sri. Rama Kant Sharma, learned counsel for Vigilance for its strict compliance. perwez ( Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)