Cr.MMO No.28 of 2011. 24.05.2011 Present: Mr. N.K. Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Dheeraj Kumar Vashisht, Advocate, for respondent No.2. This petition under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the father-in-law and the husband of respondent No.2, praying that proceedings pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Court No.2, Amb, under Sections 498-A, 406, 506 read with Section 34 Indian Pendal Code, as alleged in FIR No.99 of 2008, dated 13.7.2008 be quashed and set aside. Notice of this petition was issued to respondent No.2, but she was unable to attend Court because of her advanced stage of pregnancy. She is represented by counsel Sh. Dheeraj Kumar. It is undisputed before me that she has re-married after obtaining divorce by mutual consent. She has filed an affidavit, which is taken on record and states that divorce had been obtained by her and her husband on mutual consent basis. She has re-married with one Sh. Naveen Thakur and that she has compromised all the matrimonial disputes with her husband. Learned counsel Sh. Dheeraj Kumar appearing for respondent No.2 submits that he has instructions to state on behalf of complainant Smt. Aman Kumari that she does not wish to pursue this case against her previous husband and father-in-law. Taking into consideration the affidavit filed and the law laid down in Preeti Gupta vs. State of Jharkhand, (2010) 7 Supreme Court Cases 667 and Full Bench judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court in Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, VOL.CXLVII-2007 (3), PLR-439, I accepts this petition. Accordingly, it is diected that the FIR No.99 of 2008, dated 13.7.2008, under Sections 498-A, 406, 506 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code, filed with the Police Station, Gagret, District una is quashed and set aside. Consequently, all subsequent acts thereto including any case instituted on this First Information Report is quashed and set aside. The petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. May 24, 2011 (rkv) (Dev Darshan Sud), Judge.