IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.5594 of 2004 Between: M/s Balajinagar Housing Board Colony Welfare Association, Rep. by its President Sri Anji Reddy S/o N. Chandra Reddy, MIG H.No. 177, Balajinagar Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad- 500 072. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Andhra Pradesh Housing Board, Rep. by its Vice- Chairman, Gruhakalpa, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 The Andhra Pradesh Housing Board, Rep. by its Executive Engineer(Housing) North Division, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. 3 Andhra Pradesh Housing Board, Rep by its S.E. North Zone, Bharatnagar Colony, Moosapet, Hyderabad. 4 Commissioner ,Kukatpally Municipality, Moosapet, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or direction, more particularly one in the Nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents in trying to auction the area earmarked for shops as commercial plots abutting 30' feet road opposite to MIG houses, without getting the layout sanctioned for dividing the area into plots from HUDA, and without considering the welfare of the public and traffic on the road, as illegal, arbitrary and against the original layout, and in violation of Sec. 184 (2) (4) (ii) of A.P. Municipalities Act, and consequently to restrain the respondents from auctioning the items 1 to 9, in the list of Plots, put up for sale by the 1 and 2 respondents and further direct the Respondents to widen the existing Road from 30 feet to 60 feet, taking into consideration the moving of vehicles on the road and the existing congested road. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.SUDHAKAR REDDY & NEERAJA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : MR.J.PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : MR.M.VISWANATH The Court made the following : ORDER: Though the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”, none appears for the petitioner. Obviously, the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. _________ 27.01.2005 sh To 1 The Vice Chairman, Andhra Pradesh Housing Board, Gruhakalpa, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 The Executive Engineer (Housing), Andhra Pradesh Housing Board, North Division, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. 3 The Senior Engineer, Andhra Pradesh Housing Board, North Zone, Bharatnagar Colony, Moosapet, Hyderabad. 4 Commissioner ,Kukatpally Municipality, Moosapet, Hyderabad. 5 2CD copies.