IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32820 of 2011 1. Savitri Devi wife of Bachan Yadav 2. Rinki Devi, wife of Santosh Yadav Both are residents of village- Bechuya Bigha, PS Hulasganj, District Jehanabad Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2 25-10-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner no.1 is mother-in-law of the victim lady and petitioner no.2 is Gotini. Considering all the facts and circumstances as well as the allegation made by the father of the deceased in a case u/s 304B of the IPC, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no.1, Savitri Devi is rejected. This order shall not prejudice her case for regular bail. Considering that petitioner no.2, Rinki Devi is Gotini of the deceased and she is not a direct and close relative of the husband being herself daughter-in- law of the family, her prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. Let the petitioner no.2, namely, Rinki Devi 2 in the event of her arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Hulasganj PS case No. 44/2009 subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. BKS/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)