IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 21861 of 2008 Between: Priyadarshini Institute of Technology & Science For Women, Chinthalapudi, Tenali, Guntur District, Rep. by its Correspondent, Ch. Rama Rao ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Principal Secretary. 2 A.P. State Council for Higher Education, Mahavir Marg, Masab Tank, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Secretary. 3 Convenor, EAMCET-2008 (Admissions) C/o. A.P. State Council of Higher Education, Mahavir Marg, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a direction order or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in not according permission for inclusion of the petitioner college in the process of counseling for admission into Engineering Programme vide Impugned proceedings No. APSCHE/Secy/CETS/ September, dt. 24-9- 2008 as arbitrary, illegal, and for a consequential direction to the respondents to ensure that the seats in the petitioner College are ﬁlled up in accordance with law for the academic year 2008-200. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.SRI RAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication and it has become infructuous. Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. __________ 14-10-2008 rkk