IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Judge’s Order NO.120 of 2007 In Suit No.2869 of 1986 Mrs.Sumati Parshuram Tawde and Ors...Plaintiffs V/s Mrs.Purnima Vilas Tawde and Ors. ..Defendants Mr.A.H.Shukla i/b Shuklal and Shukla for Plff Mr.S.A.Bhagwat for deft IA to IE CORAM:S.R.SATHE,J. DATED:10th April 2007 P.C.:- 1. Heard both the learned Advocates for the parties. 2. The learned Advocate for the defendants strongly objected for the present Judge’s Order particularly pointing out that on previous day i.e. 2-2-2007 the plaintiff had in fact made a statement that he has closed his evidence. However, if we peruse para no.2 of the said order, it is very clear that even on that day the plaintiff wanted to ask for witness summons for production of certified copies of mutation entries. So, taking into consideration the fact that defendant’s evidence is not yet started, in the interest of justice issue witness summons as prayed. Witness summons is issued for 5-6-2007. Witness summons is to be issued only for production of certified copies of mutation entries. 3. Judge’s Order is made absolute in these terms. 4. Judge’s Order is signed separately. (S.R.SATHE,J.)