appp 442-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. APPLICATION NO. 442 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3304 OF 2009 Prabhawati B. Parkhi .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra & Anr .. Respondents Mr. Sudhir Halli for the Applicant Mrs. Geeta Mulekar, APP for the State CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J DATE : 12th OCTOBER, 2011 IN CHAMBER AT 2.40 P.M. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant - original accused no. 1 and learned APP for the State. 2. This application was preferred by the applicant during the time when the trail was pending before the Trial Court. The learned counsel for the applicant states that thereafter the trial was concluded and the applicant was convicted under Sections 120- B, 420 read with 511, 468 and 471 of the IPC and sentenced to seven years on each count. The learned counsel for the applicant further states that the applicant preferred an Appeal against the said judgment and order of conviction and 1 appp 442-10.doc sentence. Learned APP states that in the said Appeal, the applicant has been released on bail by order dated 29th April, 2011. In this view of the matter, the present applicant for bail has become infructuous and is disposed of as such. [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J ] 2 appp 442-10.doc 3