IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17002 of 2008 BAL MUKUND PRASAD . Versus THE STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS . ------- 03 24.12.2009 With the supplementary affidavit and rejoinder, obviously, dispute has traveled to a level where the elements of criminality emerges from the same. Petitioner categorically states that forged and fabricated documents have been used in the supplementary affidavit to justify the payment of Rs 44,000/- which petitioner claims to have never received. If the petitioner is so convinced about his submission and the affidavit, let him go and lodge a police case before the concerned police station having jurisdiction in the matter. So far as the payment of loan and deduction is concerned, it will have to be paid on the basis of grant of the loan which was to the tune of Rs 2 lakh. If the petitioner is willing to resolve the matter with the bank at this stage, he may do so and the bank will be obliged to de-freez the salary account, which was consequence of the present dispute. So far as final settlement with regard to borrowing is concerned that adjustment will be made subject to the outcome of the police investigation provided the petitioner decides to lodge a case in this regard. No final direction or opinion in the dispute is recorded by this court in view of the above observation in the writ application. The writ application is disposed of with the limited observation and liberty. shahid (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J))