C.R.No.5249 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.5249 of 2009 Date of Decision : 14.09.2009 Dr. Mandip Singh ...Petitioner Versus Simardeep Kaur ...Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned trial Court on 22.8.2009, whereby an application filed by the petitioner under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure for stay of proceedings under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act'), initiated by the wife, was dismissed. The petitioner has sought challenge the said order on the ground that he has filed a petition under Section 9 of the Act in the year 2006 i.e. much prior to the filing of petition for dissolution of marriage by the wife, which is now pending before the learned Addl. District Judge, Bathinda. I do not find any patent illegality in the order passed by the learned trial Court, only for the reason that Section 9 petition was filed earlier in point of time. But I deem it appropriate to order the said petition to be decided alongwith petition under Section 13 of the Act filed by the respondent-wife. Such process will avoid the possibility of contradictory judgments. C.R.No.5249 of 2009 2 Consequently, the petition titled “Dr. Mandip Singh Vs. Simardeep Kaur” pending in the Court of Shri Baljinder Singh, Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Bathinda shall stand transferred to the Court of Shri S.K.Sachdeva, Addl. District Judge (FTC), Bathinda. Parties to appear before the transferee Court for further proceedings. Revision petition stands disposed of in above terms. 14.09.2009 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE `