1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1399 OF 2010 IN REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO. 1246 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 889 OF 2009 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office } Memoranda of Coram, } Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's } orders or directions } and Registrar's orders } ___________________________}___________________________________ Mr. S.S.Chaudhari, Advocate holding for Mr. N.D.Kendre, Advocate for applicants. Mr. R.B. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondents. ........................... [ CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR, J. ] DATE : 10/02/2010 PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. Delay condoned. The review application is filed on the ground that the equity was considered by the courts below. This court held that the trial court or the first appellate court can not 2 identify shares at the time of granting partition decree. The liberty is already granted to the purchaser to make appropriate representation to the Collector in order to put-forth their claims. No need to review. Dismissed. [ V.R.KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE knp/CA 1399.09 in SA 889.09