1 cri.appln. no. 543 of 2011 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLEATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 543 OF 2011 The State of Maharashtra ... Applicant Versus Pavan Shantaram Salunke and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATED : JULY 22, 2011 P.C. Heard the learned A.P.P. for State. Perused the evidence of witnesses. Admit to the extent of respondent no. 1 Pawan Shantaram Salulnkhe. We are not inclined to admit the appeal to the extent of respondent nos. 2 and 3 as at the time of assault on deceased Nutan, 2 cri.appln. no. 543 of 2011 they were not in the house. None of the witnesses have attributed any role to respondent nos. 2 and 3. The reasoning given by the learned Judge is cogent. Consequently leave refused to the extent of respondent nos. 2 and 3. Action under section 390 Cr.P.C. be taken in so far as respondent no. 1 is concerned. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.)