INT WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 O CONSTIVTU’TION OF INDIA {IV/60 (J0 c HE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH y, WP. Noié’if/zom PETITIONEB :J"/Tikeshwar Prasad Yadav aged 33 years S/o Kuber Ram Yadav R/o Village Diwanpur Tahsil Pathalgaon Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) Vs RESPONDENATS : 1/State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Wgjz Panchayat & Rural Department M '3 Raipur. . The Collector Jashpur (C.G.) 3. The Chief Education Officer Janpad Panchayat, Pathaigaon Dist. Jashpur (C.G.) \_~w F f / - t YaH22 mw,mm x $33 wéyr m w.P.No. 1645/2001 m 290 ‘ fa'ma? aman mmw‘ga . W&4W@§Wwm q $Wem 9/10/2001 Shri Bharatlal Dembra. learned counsel fox the petitionen Dr.N.K. Shukla, learned Dy.A.G. for respondent/State. Heardg '0 R D E R The'petitioner ’was given appointment as Shiksha Karmi . Class-III (Assistant Teacher) in Primary School, Bagai Pariya (Ta‘rekala) by the Chief Education Officer, Janpa‘d Panohayat, V'Pathalgaon. vide order date 24/3/1999. While serving in the same post,’ the service of the writ, petitioner was terminated by another order issued on 28/4/2001. The revision petition was filed before the Additi ‘ l collector. Jashpur. Itewas ‘ W ¢ ‘\‘;/ disposed of on772-8/6/2001 wi a direction to tte Chief Educa- tion Officer that the petit ner's case should be considered after obtaining permission f om the Additional Collector, Jashpur. on the ground that ince juniors had been retained, the service of the Writ -peti ioner could not have been termi- nated. however, as permissi n was not available, the Chief Education Officer could not einstate the writ petitioner in service. In this regard a c unication was submitted to the Additional Director by C.E .0. However. there was no response from the Additional Director.‘ The writ petitioner filed [View .020. r mm( W”) /V mmalm WWwW¥WW{ V $a’l‘—vcmm O. 2 representation before th and thereafter represent Chief Education Officer After hearing learn well as Dr.N.K. Shukla. I am of the opinion that before the Competent Aut diSpoeed of on merit. In the result, this direction that the AreSpo shall: dispose of the rep regarding permission to 1 Qfficer within a period ‘T he reSp‘ officer shall thereafter pending before “him one re‘ him by the Collector wit In View ofthe statement by‘ ’ the Collector (knnexu re p/3) . dated 28/5/2001; re‘ sho11 be no difficulty in‘passing favourable order-re of this order. e Additional Collector on 9/8/2001 ations were also made befae the 9n 10/8/2001 and 17/8/2001. ed counsel for the petiiioner’as‘ learned Dy.A.G. for tie State, since representations at? pen; ' hority. the same ought to5have' éee‘n petition is disposed of with the ndent, no.2 4: the Collector, JaShpur ; resentation pending before him 3e given totthe Chief Education 3f 15 day‘sfrom the date of receipt 3ndent no.3 - the Chief Education . disposerof‘ the representation ‘V \ 1in a period of panother 15 daY‘ . made in paras of the order passed :eipt of suchpermission g‘.:‘v\en to Certified copy as. per rules. r Sdl- 33 Chief Justice y" 501000. 1/2001 GRPRJ—FSB 11 \k f \m {0 k§¢RM/'\V v\ §D ’.