^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.O) No. 4591 of 2005 Petitioner Smt. Sarojbata, W{fe of Shri VInod Kumar Sinha, AQsistant Toacher, Agod about 39 yssrs, Posted at Govt. Primary School Namnakaia, BSock & Dtetrict Amb'kapur (Surguja), C.G. Versus Respondent 1. State of ChhatSlsgarh. Through Secretary, Schooi Education DspartmsnS, D. K. S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Director, Pubh'c (nstructions. Pens'on Bsds, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, District AmblRapur (Surguja), Chhattssgarh. SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotn, w* Shri Anupam Dubey, Advocate for ihe petitioner. •Sh" V. V. S. Murthy, Deputy Advocate Gensrat w'rth -Smt. Anju Ahuja, Depufr? Govt. Advocate for the respondents ORDER (Pass©don this 30th day of ftflarch, 2007) The fo!towjng crder ofthe CoUi't is passed by Satlsh K. Agnthotrs, J. 1. The petjtloner has SSed this petitson cha!{snging the transfer order 4.10.2001. By vjrtue of the jntsrim stay granted by the Madhya Pradesh Admjnistratjve Tribuna! at Raipur the pe^tioner ss contjnusng at the origlnal p!ace of postlng. 2. Be that as It may, with the passage of time this petjtion has become jnfructuous as period of transfer is not appSicabie forever. At Uils point of time there is no questson to exsmine ths validity of the transfer order. However, the respondents sre at {ibsrty to pass appropriats orders ksepjng sn vle'vv the pub!Sc Interest and adminjstrative exigency, wjthout insjsting on compllance ofthe Smpusnsd transfer order. 3. tn v?sw of the above, thls petitjon stands dlsposed of. No order as to costs. — Fhakur Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge