/^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OP CHHATFISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l WRITPETITIQNNO. 3 8^ /2006 PETITIONER .Y^ -...-•^. ^;..^^' ...^^^•-•-"" A^-l"\ '"E:l-:-" ^•""^^''^y'" ^'?""^w '''}^">'" ?'°°", ....•-•" '^•"" RESPONDENTS Srat. AIka Phflips, aged about 34 years, wife of Shri Nitish PhJlips, resident of - Mission Road, Korba, Tah. And Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS ^ ^ «-^a^"si M "' o.el 'i^. '^^/ ° fc ''' ,bl-- 1. StateofChhattisgarh, through ~ the Secretary, Department of Ttibal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipiu- (C.G.) 2. Assistant Coimnissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Kansabadi, Korba (C.G.) y3. The Rrincipal, Goverrunent ffigher Secondaiy School, Mission Road, Korba (CG). 4. Smt. Rini Dubey, Leeturer (Eng.) Government High.er Secondary School, Misslon Road, Korba (C.G.). 1 /••-- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION 0:F INDtA. •^-u^y ^' .. /^v 9- ,^ XI-HC-78 *41*1MI ShWVh 3^ '<<l<llcl<l, STfl^'IS, Rtdlti^ rra- .^ .^,y6: Af?.lUP. W^ 200 3n^?T4a<t> ('i^t^'a^ff) 311^1^)1 R-fi<<) craTSn^TshHiti S^IRTC flf?tT 311^?T 7.8.2006 Shri Aneesh Pandey Advoccrt^e for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bcycy, 6ovt. Ad^ Heord. Higher Secondary School, Missior^ «h|t|?i-l<fl-lWRff ff fei^t ;rfSR3R ^i3Tf^1T3n^T ocate for the State on advance copy. By this petition the petition^r has chatlenged her transfer order dated 7.7.2006 (Annexure P-1) Mfhereby ^ie has been transferred from Sovernment Road, Korba to 6irls Education Higher Secondary School, Chowki, Rcynandg|aon. The main grievance of the p^titioner is that respondent No.4 vide order dated 4.9.2000 (Annexure P-3) wlps transferred from &overnment Higher Secondary School, Korba to Sover^iment Higher Secondary School, Chaitma, bistrict Korba, but in pursuance relieved and continued to work in Mission Road, Korba and now witho| been transferred declarin9 her a^ after the petitioner, therefore, be| hove been tr'ansferred. Therefore, learned counsel petitioner may be allowed to make a Shri Bajaj, learned ©ovt.Adv. for tl^ Having heard learned counsri merit of the case, the petitioner \a to respondent No.l raising all the ^ of that order respondent No.4 was not I'he Sover'nment Higher Secondary School, ut amending that order the petitioner has surptus, whereas, respondent No.4 came ing a junior to the petitioner she ought to for the petitioner submits that the detailed representation to respondent No.l and in turn, he be directed to decid^ the same in accordance with law, to which e State has no objection. for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the c^se, without expressing any opinion on the allowed to make a detailed representation rievances within 10 days from today alon9 P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3:5T -<<|qic|<<, ®Tnt1']$,[sldiuy *TTW:'n Sb*<l<*> ^ 200 31T^?T'4ach (yil^5)^) STI^T^irRFTR; (raTan^rgiiTR; .^1;, Roshan/- STaTWHfsa'sii^T -zl in turn, respondent No.l to decide the t^ithin a period of 30 days from the date of acc()r-dance with law ofter considering all the with copy of this petition and representation of the petitioner receipt of r'epresentation in 9rievances raised by the petitionetf. Till the decision of the r^pr-esentation, the petitioner' should not be relieved, if already not relieved. With the dir'ection aforesai|d, Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.^c Certified copy os per rules. Sd'- ..C. BhsEiGiO ae WTfepftT Wqcff ifteit Tf^RTC ^srf^Tran^T I, the petition stands disposed of. 986/06 also stands disposed of. P.T.O. '^ ^