IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4090 of 2009 Santosh Kumar Yadav alias Santosh Rai, Son of Upendra Yadav, Resident of Village Kharka Basant, P.S. Jalley, District Darbhanga. --------- Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar --------- Opposite Party ----------- 2 8.5.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. From a bare look of this case, it appears to be out and out a case of matrimonial dispute. Initially, the petitioner, the husband, had filed a divorce case on the ground of cruelty. That was followed by the present complaint case and thereafter, the wife has filed a case for maintenance. Though, before the court below as recorded in the impugned order, the petitioner was not ready to restore relationship despite willingness shown by the wife, counsel for the petitioner now submit that even when he is paying a sum of Rs. 1500/- per month as directed by this Court in the maintenance, he is ready to restore the relationship with his wife, the informant, of this case. That being so, if the petitioner would restore his relationship and keep his wife 2 with all dignity, this Court would grant bail to him for a limited period of three months whereafter the court below will analyze the improved relationship of the petitioner with his wife. In the event, the court below will be satisfied that the petitioner and his wife, the informant of this case, have started living peacefully, such provisional bail being granted for the period of three months will be confirmed or otherwise, the petitioner will be taken into custody. Let the petitioner, namely, Santosh Kumar Yadav alias Santosh Rai therefore, surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today and on his so surrendering, he shall be enlarged on bail only for a period of three months as indicated above in connection with C.R. No. 98 of 2008 (T.R. No. 3100 of 2008) on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Samastipur, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)