HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 916 of 2008 (M/S) Sri Sri 1008 Narayan Swamy Institute of Medical Science & Research … Petitioner .. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others … Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State for Uttarakhand/respondent nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5. Ms. Krishi Shukla, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 11th December, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. List revised. Case called out twice. None appears for the petitioner. Heard Sri K.P. Upadhyay, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 as well as Ms. Krishi Shukla, Advocate for respondent no. 3. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner as it is aggrieved by order dated 3.4.2008 (annexure no. 2 to the writ petition) passed by respondent no. 5 i.e. the Director General, Medical Health & Family Welfare, Uttarakhand, Dehradun by which he has rejected the application/representation of the petitioner for running a nursing course in the institute being run by the petitioner. The reason assigned by respondent no. 5 for rejecting the application/representation of the petitioner is that the institute concerned where such training has to be imparted does not fulfill the parameters for grant of such recognition. In fact, a survey of institute was done on 17.8.2007 by a committee and it was found that the shortcomings which were earlier pointed out to the petitioner have not been removed as yet and, therefore, the petitioner does not fall in the category of an institute which can be 2 granted permission for running nursing course in the institute. This Court has perused the order dated 3.4.2008. It finds no anomaly in the same. There are no grounds on which an interfere can be made. The writ petition lacks merit and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 11.12.2009 Avneet