^ <p HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSCyUtH ATBUASPUR DIVISION BBNCH: APPBLLAMT ireTITIONER RBSPONDBNT HON'BLBSHRIT.P.SHARMA & HON'BLBSHRI R.L. JHABWAR. JJ. F.A.tMiscl N0.67/2009 Sint. Sheetal Jiuieja w/o Shri Amit Juneja, aged about 25 yeara, Occupation nothiag, R/o Presently Purani Basti Mangal Bazar KUarsia, Distnct Raigarh (CGS) Versas Amit Juaeja s/o Shri Radha Kishan Juneja, aged about 32 years, occupation : Business, fhrough ; Shri Viaod Ccnient Wale Ka Makaa D-Block, Samadhiya Colony Lashkar Gwalior (M.P.) APPBAL UNDBR 8E("riQW 19 OF THE FAMILY^OURTSACT Present: Shri Bipin Punjabi, counsel for the ap^feBaat. Shri. Amit Sharma, coiinsel for the respondent. ORDJER (Passed oa8dlJu]y, 2010) Per T. P. Shariaa, J. *v \~. •\ '^- \" •\ "• "Y 1. Heaid. 2. Learaed counsel for fh.e parties submit tfaat botfa flie pardes are not iu a position to reside togefher aad fhey Iiave entered iato aa ^reeiaent to dissolve the inamage by a decree of divorce ia tenas of Sectioa 13 (B) of fhe Hladu Marriage Act, 1955, They are liviag separately slace Noveiuber, 2005 andseek to withdraw fhe appeal wifh. liberty to fHe a fresh writ petitmn before the competent Family Court for dissolution of mscmays by a decree of divorce ia terms of Sectton 13 (B) of the Hiadu Marriage Act. 3. In view of the above, {he appeal is disniissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberly. 4. No order as to costs. •g^vY"i1p" «' Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge Sd/- R.L. Jhanwar Judge ^ '.;. ^" I\ ^< '•••^' \~.