1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:09.11.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.(MD)NO.6065 of 2011 K.Subitha Beevi .. Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. .. Respondent This writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.05.2011. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Manikandan For Respondent : Mr.M.Ravishankar ORDER Perusal of the prayer made by the petitioner will clearly show that it is suffice that the petitioner's representation made on 19.05.2011 is directed to be disposed of by the respondent in accordance with law within a time frame. 2.In the light of the above, a direction is issued to the respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation, dated 19.05.2011 (a copy of which is found enclosed in the typed set) in accordance with law within a period of Twelve weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The result shall be communicated to the petitioner without fail. 3.It may be that the respondent would not have received such a representation or it would not be readily available in their file. Hence the petitioner is directed to send a representation along with the copy of the order within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4.Accordingly, the writ petition will stand disposed of on the above terms. No costs. vsn Sd/- Assistant Registrar[CO] /True copy/ To Sub Assistant Registrar The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. 1P/2C W.P(MD)NO.6065 of 2011 RPB : 17.11.2011 DATED:09.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/