SSM 1 28.wp.343.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 343 OF 2011 Kamalakar D. Gholap ....Petitioner Versus Ashok V. Gholap and another ....Respondents ______ Mr. A. A. Garge with Prerana Silimkar for the Petitioner. CORAM: B. R. GAVAI, J. DATED : 23 rd FEBRUARY, 2011. P.C.: The present Petition is arising out of interlocutory order. 2. In that view of matter, I am not inclined to entertain the present Petition in the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Rejected. 3. Apart from it, it can be seen that the Agreement of Sale, SSM 2 28.wp.343.11 which the Petitioners seek impounding of, does not provide a clause wherein the possession of the property has been handed at the time of the execution of the agreement. 4. In that view of the matter, no interference is warranted. (B. R. GAVAI, J.)