IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS LETTERS LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 150 OF 2006 PATENT APPEAL NO. 150 OF 2006 PATENT APPEAL NO. 150 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 4513 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 4513 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 4513 OF 2005 Shri Krishna R. Thakur ] .. Appellant Versus 1. Smt. Sabira U. Solkar & 2 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. Vijay Gharat for the appellant. CORAM: R.M. LODHA & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED: 17TH JULY, 2006 P.C. : . Heard. 2. In paragraph 5 of the impugned order, the learned Single Judge observed thus: "5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that his only grievance was to the effect that injunction was issued against him by the lower appellate court, however, in my view, the nature of injunction is much clear to the extent that the plaintiffs are held entitled to claim injunction to restrain the defendant from taking possession except in due course of law, which in my view, cannot be faulted." : 2 : 2. The nature of injunction having been clarified by the learned Single Judge, in our view, the grievance of the appellant is unfounded. 3. Appeal is dismissed in limine. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [S.J. [S.J. [S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.] VAZIFDAR, J.] VAZIFDAR, J.]