IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.DENESAN TUESDAY, THE 20TH MARCH 2007 / 29TH PHALGUNA 1928 WP(C).No. 9433 of 2007(W) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ P.GIRIJA BHAI, S.R.A.20A, SREEKRISHNA NAGAR, CHAVADYMUKKU, SRIKARYAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN SRI.TOJAN J. VATHIKULAM RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE UDIO VISUAL AND REPROGRAPHIC CENTRE, PUNNAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, KERALA STATE AUDIO VISUAL REPROGRAPHIC CENTRE, PUNNAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 & 2 BY SC SMT. LATHA KRISHNAN R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SHRI. BIJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.K.DENESAN, J. ----------------------------- WP(C)No. 9433 OF 2007 W ----------------------------- Dated this the 20th March, 2007. JUDGMENT The petitioner had worked as Accounts Assistant under the first respondent. It is stated that the appointment was made pursuant to a proper selection made by the first respondent for such appointment. Subsequently her service was terminated. The petitioner understands that taking into consideration subsequent developments as well the first respondent is filling up the vacancies and in that process re-appointments also are ordered. However, the petitioner's case is not considered. She has therefore filed Ext.P7 representation before the second respondent requesting to consider her preferential right for re-employment and for passing appropriate orders. 2. I have heard counsel for the petitioner and standing counsel for respondents 1 and 2. It appears that Government is only a formal party. However, I have heard the Govt. Pleader also. 3. In the facts and circumstances there shall be an order directing the second respondent to consider Ext.P7 and pass orders having regard to all facts and circumstances, in any event, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. WPC 9433/2007 2 The petitioner shall produce the copy of the judgment before the second respondent for information and action. K.K.DENESAN Judge jj