1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3439/2005 (Dilip Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) Date of order : 18.1.2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. PR Singh,for the petitioner Mr. SKM Vyas, for the respondents Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the order of suspension which has been challenged by the instant writ petition has been revoked and he has also been paid subsistance allowance @ 50% of the salary. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that beyond the period of six months from the date of suspension, petitioner is entitled for subsistance allowance @ 75% of the salary for which he would make a representation to the respondents. In this view of the matter the main relief of challenging the order of suspension has already been granted to the petitioner by revoking the order of suspension and therefore, it would be appropriate to direct the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents ventilating his other grievance, if any, within one month from today. If such a 2 representation is made, the same shall be decided in accordance with law within a period of three months therefrom. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Stay petition also stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (H.R.PANWAR),J. rm/