1 CAA No.1418/10 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1771 of 2010 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1418 of 2010 Mr.Arun s/o. Ambalal Trivedi ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents ... Mr.A.M.Saraogi with Rajiv Gupta for the appellant. Mr. G.S.Godbole with Chandan Athani i/b V.K.Mahangare for respondent no.4. Ms.K.K.Soraan for BMC respondent no.3. Mr.P.G.Lad for respondent nos.1 and 2. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 23rd December 2010 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Appeal has been admitted and in my view, a prima facie vase for grant of an injunction during the pendency of an appeal is made out. In 2 CAA No.1418/10 paragraph no.19 of the plaint, the appellant plaintiff has alleged the use of muscle power by the office bearers of respondent no.4 in trying to dispossess him and acts of vandalism and theft of movable property in the flat which is admittedly in his possession. The appellant has also reported the facts to the police vide letter dated 30 October 2010. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellants statement has been recorded. The appellant has also annexed the photograph to show the destruction of the fittings in the flat. In the circumstances, it would be appropriate to grant an injunction. Hence, there shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) till the disposal of the appeal. (D.G.KARNIK, J)