SB Crlmb No.9284/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CR.MISC.2nd BAIL APPLICATION NO.9284/2010. Ritesh Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 27/10/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ J Shri Shailesh Kumar Panwar for petitioner. Shri Peeyush Kumar, Public Prosecutor for State. ****** Heard learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for petitioner is that co-accused Deshraj and Banji were enlarged on bail vide order of this Court dated 16/7/2010 on which date, bail application of the petitioner was rejected because it was argued on behalf of the complainant that he had subjected brother of the complainant, Suresh to beating on the very next day of the incident. The fact is that Suresh was neither brother of the complainant nor was cited as a witness in the present case. Subsequently, another co-accused Annu has also been enlarged on bail vide order dated 4/10/2010 passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court. It is contended that fatal injury sustained by Rajesh has been assigned to another co-accused Chhitar and not to the present petitioner. Apart from this case, no other SB Crlmb No.9284/10. 2 criminal case is pending against the petitioner. Petitioner is behind the bars since 8/7/2010. Trial of the case will take long. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application but could not controvert the aforesaid facts. Considering the submissions made at the bar, the nature of accusation, the materials on record and all other facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. In the result, this second bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Ritesh S/o Shri Chhitar Lal @ Sita Ram Gurjar shall be released on bail in FIR No.209/2010 P.S. Khanpur, District Jhalawar for offence u/Ss.341, 323, 325, 308, 147, 148 and 149 IPC on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing until conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil