^ l^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.1 CIVIL REVISION N0. APPLICANT :^ .. p^A1 Babulal Bansal, Son of Shri OF2o05 SINGLEBENCH ^wy - ^s^ ^ t>^ R.ESPONDENT Tarachand Agrawal, aged.about 39 years, Resident of Village Baghima, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS /State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Collector, Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.). CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE,1908 1 »«.|r]~» "—^•""-T" .TS^s-' ?38p3B^Ba—-' • • XI-HC-22 ^•s? ^pn^ra, ^ft^ms, •fq^irey .^-i.:.^o,..\^ 0^-^:5 200 SS: an^i^T h-u'h sv^v ^+ll(tl -^^ } ^..^ sii^i'FRnwdf?^ 25/Ol/2K)06 Shri Sushfl Dubey, CoiuMeI Shri Akhil Mishra, Panel No.l/State. Heanl on M.C.P. No.l682/2pa'5, an appUcation filed under Sectiou. 5 offhe Liinitatkin Act for 4onidonatk>n ofdelay. Leamed counscl for the ap^ instaat revision hc has chaUengct] <=bl<4i<*i41'l ^iH<nT ^ f^L^ \F^'^.i< ^sipaiisn^r for fhe appUcant. Lawyer for fhe non-appUcant lUcant submits that under fhe fhe order dated 29/09/2004 passed by the Court below. He fi^rther subaaits fhat fhe revision has been filed by a delay of 171 d4ys along wifh an appUcation for condoaation of delav. Leanled Panel Lawver for non- appUcant/State submits fhat ]For condonation of delay, no satisfactory grouhd has been as^igned by fhe appUcant in his applicatkin. apjplication, Froin bare readm^ of fhe condoiiation of delay of 171 days assigned in the appUcation, there^ire, be disinissed and is accordingly di^missed As fhe applicaton for disnussed, fherefore, the revisi|3n 29/09/2004 is also liabfeto be dis^mssed plication, it is Baanifest fhat for no suffkaent ground has bcen :, fhe appUcation dpservcs to coAdoiiation of delav has been agamst fhe order dated [Tft^ ^f<^^ XI-HC-22 3(^1 ^il 1gsri?T 3iit?i ^hW^ -yf?^ !? -s^i ^wivi^, v-S\w\s, -fq^rey ^n raju sii^rwnwCTt^T Ai Heard on revision against The order datcd 07/05/t application f3ed by the applicat reviewing the order dated 29/09/^ aweU reasoned order, has dismis^ does notcall for anv interference. luthe result, fhe revision is +l<l[f)<fl-]t|IK<-il''? fe3t tfSRSR i? sipgT snt?i orderdated 07/05/2005. 2005 is passed on a review it before the Court below for 004. The teamed trial Court by ied- the revfew appUcatioa which isnussed. Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge