BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twentieth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13755 of 2011 1 MAHESWARI 2 MUTHULAKSHMI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.3 & 4 Vs THE STATE REP. BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THANJAVUR TALUK POLICE STATION, CR.NO.558 OF 2011. THANJAVUR. ... RESPONDENT / RESPONDENT For Petitioner : M/S. M.DANIEL MANOHARAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S. K.S.DURAIPANDI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are accused Nos.3 and 4 in Crime No.558 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police. Initially this case was registered for offence under sections 307 and 324 I.P.C. The victim succumbed to injuries on 08.10.2011. Thereafter, the offence has been now altered into one under Section 302 I.P.C. The petitioners were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 12.09.2011. In these circumstances, they seek bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, due to previous motive, the first accused attacked the deceased with knife and these two petitioners, who are women attacked the deceased with wooden logs. The deceased has given a statement implicating these petitioners also. The investigation is pending. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would deny the above allegations. He would further submit that the second petitioner is aged about 61 years and the first petitioner is aged about 25 years. These two women, according to the learned counsel, have been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the first petitioner has got two young children, who are suffering a lot, because the first petitioner is in prison. He would further submit that the second petitioner, who happens to be a lady aged about 61 years, it is very difficult for her to continue to be in prison. 4. I have considered the above submissions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Having regard to the overt act attributed to the petitioners and the fact that both the petitioners are women and that the first petitioner has got two children and the second petitioner is an old woman and all other attendant circumstances, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioners, but with stringent conditions. 6. In the result, this petition is ordered and bail is granted to the petitioners on the following conditions:- i) The petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thanjavur. ii) the petitioners shal report before the All Women Police Station, Thanjavur, everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. sd/- 20/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II THANJAVUR 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THANJAVUR AT KUMBAKONAM 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY 5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THANJAVUR TALUK POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR. 6 THE OFFICER INCHARGE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR +1. CC to M/S. M.DANIEL MANOHARAN Advocate SR.No.36445 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13755 of 2011 Date :20/10/2011 SMA/21.10.2011/8C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/