THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKUR AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Writ Appeal No.1349 OF 2011 DATED:26-12-2011 Between: Bodagala Venkatramaiah ….Appellant And The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Secretary, I& CAD (PW) Department, Hyderbad and two others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKUR AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No. 1349 OF 2011 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur) 1. The appellant is aggrieved by an order dated 29.11.2011 passed by a learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 10000 of 2010. 2. The learned Single Judge noted that the appellant had filed an earlier writ petition, being Writ Petition No. 11991 of 2009, which was dismissed on 20.10.2009 with liberty to agitate his rights by availing of an appropriate remedy. 3. Without disclosing this fact, the appellant filed another writ petition, containing absolutely the same relief. In fact, the learned Single Judge has noted that the relief claimed in the earlier writ petition and the relief claimed in the second writ petition is verbatim the same. 4. The appellant had deliberately suppressed these facts, which came out when a counter affidavit was filed by the respondents. 5. In the present appeal, it is submitted that the appellant did not mention about the earlier writ petition since he is aged 66 years, he is a diabetic patient having heart ailments, knee pain, he fell down in November, 2009 and injured his head and suffered some memory loss. 6. There is absolutely no material to support any of these ailments. 7. We are of the view that the learned Single Judge was justified in dismissing the writ petition for concealment of material facts. 8. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed. 9. The interim application is also dismissed. MADAN B. LOKUR, CJ SANJAY KUMAR, J 26-12-2011 pnb