IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.911 of 2009 NIVA TRIVEDI @ NIVA PANDEY, WIFE OF ANAND PANDEY D/O SRI TRIBHUWAN TRIVEDI, RESIDENT AT ANNUPRANIKA KAUTILYA NAGAR (BEHIND S.G.I. S.S. MAIN ROAD) A.G. COLONY P.S. SHASTRINAGAR DISTT PATNA. Versus ANAND PANDEY @ DEEPAK SON OF LATE SRI RAM PANDEY, R/O M.I.G. 78, ADITYAPUR 2, JAMSHEDPUR-831013, JHARKHAND. For the Petitioner : M/S Ranjan Kumar Sinha,Advocate Seema,Advocate ----------- 2. 21.1.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This civil revision is directed against the order dated 9.3.2009 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, patna in Matrimonial Case No.590 of 2007, whereby he has granted interim maintenance of Rs.34,300/-(rupees thirty four thousand three hundred) to the opposite party. The question arises in this case is as to whether the forum of civil revisional jurisdiction of this Court would be available for challenging the impugned order. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that in view of the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Jagdish Pd. Chouhan v. Bhuneshwar Chouhand and anr., reported in 2009(4)BBCJ,442 the civil revision may not be maintainable, however, it is further submitted that even if there is bar under section 19(5) of - 2 - N.H./ the Family Courts Act, 1984 (hereinafter to be referred to as “the Act”) for filing any revision against any judgment, order or decree other than which has been described in section 19 of the Act itself, there should not be a bar on challenge being made under Article 227 of the Constitution of India or any other remedy available to him under law. This goes without saying that if any remedy is available to the petitioner under law, no liberty is necessary to be granted for availing the same. In the above view of the matter, respectfully relying upon the decision rendered in the case of Jagdish Pd. Chouhan (supra), I hold that this civil revision is not maintainable. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merit of the respective cases of the parties. ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J.)