IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10669 & 10670 of 2011-G. Decided on: December 12, 2011. 1. CWP No. 10669 of 2011-G Sh. Baldev Chand, s/o Prabha Ram, R/o Village Nalta, PO Hari Bahna, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, presently working as Shastri in Govt. Sr. Sec. School Kashapat, Tehsil Rampur, Distt. Shimla, H.P. ……….Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Himachal Pradesh through its Principal Secretary (Education) to the Government of H.P. Shimla-2. 2. Director of Elementary Education, Govt. of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-1(HP). 3. Deputy Director of Elementary Education, Shimla, Tehsil and District Shimla, H.P. ……….Respondents. 2. CWP No. 10670 of 2011-G Sh. Nand Lal Verma, s/o Sh. Kanshi Ram, R/o Village Darkoti, PO Pounta, Tehsil Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P. presently working as Shastri Teacher in Govt. Middle School, Poabo (Dhumi), Tehsil and Distt. Shimla, H.P. ……….Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Himachal Pradesh through its Principal Secretary (Education) to the Government of H.P. Shimla-2. 2. Director of Elementary Education, Govt. of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-1(HP). 3. Deputy Director of Elementary Education, Shimla, Tehsil and District Shimla, H.P. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. For the petitioners: Mr. Lakshay Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners in these cases were originally appointed as JBT on adhoc basis and thereafter they were appointed as O.T., on tenure basis. The period they were appointed on adhoc basis as JBT will count as qualifying service for the purpose of pension only, whereas tenure service in O.T. will count for the purpose of pension and increments as well, in view of the judgment of this Court in CWP No. 4550 of 2010, titled as Ravi Kumar versus State of H.P. & ors. The needful shall be done including disbursement of consequential benefits within a period of 4 months from the date of production of the copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment, referred to above. 2. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. December 12, 2011, ( Justice Dev Darshan Sud), (karan/vs) Judge.