IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITON NO. 37 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITON NO. 37 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITON NO. 37 OF 2005 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2465 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 2465 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 2465 OF 2004 Eductional and Welare Foundation, Eductional and Welare Foundation, Eductional and Welare Foundation, Mumbai. ..Petitioner Mumbai. ..Petitioner Mumbai. ..Petitioner (Org.Petitioner) (Org.Petitioner) (Org.Petitioner) Versus Versus Versus Mr. Johny Joseph, Commissioner Mr. Johny Joseph, Commissioner Mr. Johny Joseph, Commissioner The Municipal Corporation of Greater The Municipal Corporation of Greater The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. ..Respondents Mumbai & Ors. ..Respondents Mumbai & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Pankaj Das for Petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Das for Petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Das for Petitioner. Mrs. Ajith Kumar for B.M.C. Mrs. Ajith Kumar for B.M.C. Mrs. Ajith Kumar for B.M.C. Mr. Milind More, AGP, for State. Mr. Milind More, AGP, for State. Mr. Milind More, AGP, for State. CORAM CORAM CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. S.K.SHAH,J. S.K.SHAH,J. DATE DATE DATE : 15th July,2005. 15th July,2005. 15th July,2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 1. Heard. 1. Heard. 2. As per the Order passed on 31.8.2004 in the Writ 2. As per the Order passed on 31.8.2004 in the Writ 2. As per the Order passed on 31.8.2004 in the Writ Petition, the plans submitted by the Petitioner have Petition, the plans submitted by the Petitioner have Petition, the plans submitted by the Petitioner have been considered by the Respondents with regard to the been considered by the Respondents with regard to the been considered by the Respondents with regard to the Khandia Play Ground located at Khandia Street, "E" Khandia Play Ground located at Khandia Street, "E" Khandia Play Ground located at Khandia Street, "E" Wrd, Mumbai. Now the dispute seems to be with regard Wrd, Mumbai. Now the dispute seems to be with regard Wrd, Mumbai. Now the dispute seems to be with regard to P.T.Mane Udyan which was not the subject matter to P.T.Mane Udyan which was not the subject matter to P.T.Mane Udyan which was not the subject matter in the Writ Petition. in the Writ Petition. in the Writ Petition. 3. Therefore, nothing survives in this Contempt 3. Therefore, nothing survives in this Contempt 3. Therefore, nothing survives in this Contempt Petition. The Contempt Petition stands dismissed. Petition. The Contempt Petition stands dismissed. Petition. The Contempt Petition stands dismissed. --- --- --- (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.)