IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 19TH JUNE 2009 / 29TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 16989 of 2009(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SADANANDAN, USHA NIVAS, SASTHAVATTOM, PERUMKUZHY, VEILOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MUHAMMED RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, KAZHAKKOOTTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, MANGALAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B FOR R1 & 2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.16989 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of June, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that on 30.12.2008, the power supply to his premises was disconnected on the allegation that the meter was in an adjacent premises. According to the petitioner, since then he has been representing for restoration of power supply, but however respondents have not taken any action on the representations so made. The petitioner says that, thereupon he has filed Ext.P7 complaint before the first respondent, which also remains unattended. It is with this complaint the writ petition is filed. 2. Taking into account the above complaint raised in this writ petition, I feel at this stage, the grievance of the petitioner will be redressed, if the first respondent considers Ext.P7. WP(c).No.16989/09 2 Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P7, if the same has been received and is pending. Orders shall be passed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment, with notice to the petitioner. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.16989/09 3