IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9215 of 2008 ANURADHA KUMARI, W/o Bhagat Singh, resident of Village-Panapur, Gram Panchayat Raj-Bhawanandpur, Prakhand + P.S.-Birpur, District- Begusarai. ..............Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. District Magistrate, Begusarai. 4. District Superintendent of Education, Begusarai. 5. Block Development Officer, Birpur, District-Begusarai. 6. Block Education Extension Officer, Birpur, District-Begusarai. 7. Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj, Bhawanandpur, Prakhand-Birpur, District- Begusarai. 8. Azara Praveen, W/o Md. Asharaffuddin, Village-Bhawanandpur, P.S.- Birpur, District-Begusarai. ...............Respondents. ----------- 2/ 16.04.2010 I.A. No. 2701 of 2010. Interlocutory application has been filed by the petitioner for adding one more relief in the prayer portion of the main writ application due to subsequent development. However, in course of submission, the counsel for the petitioner has prayed that he may be permitted to pursue his case before the District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal in the light of order passed in C.W.J.C. No. 15381 of 2009 (Annexure-13) as the order which is under challenge in the present writ application relates to appointment of respondent No. 8, who is petitioner in C.W.J.C. No. 15381 of 2009. I find that otherwise, also the writ application filed by the petitioner for quashing the selection of respondent No. 8, vide order dated 28.05.2005 has become infructuous. Since, subsequent order issued by the Panchayat Secretary, contained in Letter No. 26 2 dated 24.09.2009; the appointment of respondent No. 8 has been cancelled. In the given facts and circumstances of the case, the interlocutory application as well as the main writ application is being disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner either to file his separate appeal or file an application in the pending appeal of Azra Parween, for being impleaed as party. In case, the petitioner has filed separate appeal, the District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal will decide both the appeals analogous. In case of filing an application by the petitioner for being impleaded as party and the appeal preferred by Azara Praveen, the tribunal will consider it and allow the petitioner to be impleaded as party. In any case, the matter be adjudicated by the Tribunal, within the statutory period. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)