=1= IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION PETITION PETITION ST.NO.3710 OF 2008 ST.NO.3710 OF 2008 ST.NO.3710 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.5794 OF 2007 NO.5794 OF 2007 NO.5794 OF 2007 Shri S.V. Chindhade ...Petitioner v/s The Chief Secretary, Government of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032 and others ...Respondents Mr A.S. Shool for Petitioner. Mr S.R. Nargolkar, AGP for Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND V.M. KANADE JJ. : D.K. DESHMUKH AND V.M. KANADE JJ. : D.K. DESHMUKH AND V.M. KANADE JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 18TH OCTOBER 2008 18TH OCTOBER 2008 18TH OCTOBER 2008 =2= P.C.- 1. The learned counsel appearing for petitioner admits that there was no application made before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal for condonation of delay. In paragraph 2 of the review petition, the petitioner admits that there was delay of 86 days in approaching the M.A.T. The learned counsel submits that once writ petition was filed by the petitioner before the High Court and the High Court did not interfere because remedy of approaching the M.A.T. was available, there was no question of any further delay. In the opinion of the learned counsel, the period of limitation stops running the moment petitioner approached this Court. The submission obviously is without substance. Review petition is rejected. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary of the Court. . Certified copy is expedited. ( D.K. DESHMUKH J.) ( V.M. KANADE J.)