IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.211 OF 2005 Mohd.Zia Ul Haq Noor Mohd.Ansari ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Ms.Anjali Patil Contractor for Applicant. Mr.R.Y.Mirza, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. FEBRUARY 2, 2005. FEBRUARY 2, 2005. FEBRUARY 2, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. 2. There are circumstances to suggest the involvement of the Applicant in the commission of the crime. Besides, Applicant has been identified by prosecution witness Suresh Kale. There is no reason to doubt the evidence, which has come on record so far. Whether the said evidence needs to : 2 : be accepted, is a matter for trial. Having regard to the seriousness of the offence, not a case for bail. 3. The Principal Judge, Sessions Court, Greater Bombay is directed to assign the case to the Fast Track Court, so as to ensure early disposal of the case, preferably within nine months from today. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.