IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6433 of 2009 Between: 1 Bollinadi Vijayakumar, S/o Rama Rao, R/o. H.No. 4-75, NCRC Road, Raithupeta, Nandigama Village & Town, Krishna District. 2 Rama Rao, S/o B. Appa Rao, R/o 4-165, NCRC Road, Raithupeta, Nandigama-525185. 3 Mrs. Badramma, (A-3), W/o Rama Rao, R/o 4-165, NCRC Road, Raithupeta, Nandigama-525185. 4 B. Srinivas, (a-4), S/o Rama Rao, R/o 4-165, NCRC Road, Raithupeta, Nandigama-525185. 5 Mrs. Lalitha, (A-5), W/o Koteswara Rao @ Koti Babu, R/o 4/165, NCRC Road, Raithupeta, Nandigama-525185. 6 Mr. Koteswara Rao @ Koti Babu, (A-6), S/o Y. Narsimha Rao, R/o. LIC Colony, Guntur District. 7 Mrs. Laxmi, W/o V. Sarath Babu, R/o Nandigam, Krishna District. 8 M.Narsimha Rao, S/o late NArsimha, R/o 04/164, NCRC Road, Raithupura, Nandigama-525185. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Home Department, Secrtariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nandigama. 3 The Superintendent of Police, Krishna District at Machilipatnam. 4 The Station House officer, Vatsavai of Krishna District. 5 B. Madhavi, W/o. B. Vijayakumar, R/o.H.No. 2/3/368, Road No.4, Sai Nagar Colony, Nagole, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.PETTEM RAJAIAH This Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 5 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and filing of C.C.No.170/2008 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Jaggaiahpet, Krishna District by setting aside the same against the principles of natural justice.” After realizing the folly of the petitioners in filing this writ petition despite being unsuccessful in their endeavour to seek quashing of the criminal proceedings by filing Criminal Petition No.854 of 2008, which was dismissed by this Court by order, dated 20.03.2009, Sri P.Rajaiah, learned counsel for the petitioners sought for withdrawal of the writ petition unconditionally. Though serious exception is required to be taken on the conduct of the petitioners in filing this writ petition in the face of dismissal of their criminal petition earlier, this Court is inclined to accept the request of the learned counsel with caution to the petitioners not to repeat this conduct in future. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP.Nos.8400 and 8401 of 2009 filed by the petitioners for interim reliefs are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 12th JUNE, 2009. kvni