[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.1186 OF 2007 Mr.Nitin @ Vidyadhar Eknath Rupwate ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.M.Janardhanan Advocate for Applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : APRIL 13, 2007 DATE : APRIL 13, 2007 DATE : APRIL 13, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.I-98 of 2006 of Vithalwadi Police Station, Ulhasnagar-4. The said case is mainly under Sections 364-A and 385 of IPC. 3. On instructions, the learned A.P.P. states that trial in the present case is going on and moreover, the applicant is involved in two other cases and one case is similar in nature. Looking [-2-] to the above facts, I am not inclined to grant bail at this stage. However, liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for bail if the trial is not over within a period of one month from today. 4. Application is disposed of. [Smt. V.K.Tahilramani, J.]