BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPQR WRIT PETITION 1L} NO. g/g’z OF 2009 l 1 M/s Nakoda Transport Company Malviya Nagar, District Durg, through ‘Niya‘ Chand Jain, Ex-partner Ms/ Nakoda Transport, Durg (C.G.) VERSUS ETITIONER - L’.’ 1. Recovery Officer and- Regional i Provident Fund, Commissioner, ‘ Office, Indira Gandhi —D, Scheme Vyavasaik Parisar Block ESPONDENTS f. Regional /No. 32 Pandri, Raipur (c.G.). ‘2. Assistant Provident ‘ Fund Commissioner, Assistant Provident Commissioner, ChhattiSgarh, Regional Vyavasaik M.P. Indore, now ; Fund l Office, Indira Gandhi Parlsar Block ~D, Scheme No. 32 Pandri, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22 6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE *OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI OR DIRECTI i N OF LIKE NATURE. : 3 450 _ mm"..uuuWQLL)?>IE> . V200 a mm(‘a§i§w> mmm WWW wW énifa‘nm SB : HON’BLE SHRE JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER 03.07.2009 Shri H.N.Vyas, calmsel for m6 peti‘rimaer. Shri Pradeep Saxena, c )unsel for rcsgmndants No. 1 (SI, 2. Learned counsel for th‘ petitionar submits that he wants to withdraw the present pet' ‘on with a liberty to file suitab1e appiications before respond nt No. l 65 2 raismg all the grievances as raised in the p sent petition. He is oermitted to do s . , According1y, the petiti is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. in the eventuality of tiling suitable applications, it is expected from the respoxidents No. l 8r. 2 to decide those applications stxictly in accordance with law. Sdl- Pritinker Diwaker f Judge 7v