IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 88 of 2007(S/B) Smt. Shanti Yadav w/o Sahab Lal Yadav, C/o Radha Kishan Puneda, District Pithoragarh .……. Petitioner Versus 1. Sachiv/Mahaprabandhak, Pithoragarh Zila Sahkari Bank Ltd. Pithoragarh, Uttarakhand. 2. Mukhya Sakha Prabandhak, Pithoragarh Zila Sahkari Bank Ltd. Pithoragarh Uttarakhand …….. Respondents None for the petitioner. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S.Rawat, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) None for the petitioner. On 17.11.2007 also, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner for pressing the writ petition. 2 As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 3 The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. (J.C.S.Rawat, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 20.11.2007 20.11.2007 A