IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 763 OF 2010 MRS. MALINI NAGESHKAR AND 4 ORS, ... Petitioner Versus THE CONFRE OF THE CONFRARIA OF SANTISSINO SACRAMENTO E DE NOSSA SENHORA DE GUIA ... Respondent Mr. A. D. Bhobe,advocate for the petitioners. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 13th December, 2010 P.C: Heard Mr. Bhobe, learned counsel for the petitioners. By this petition, the petitioners challenge the order dated 30/6/2010 passed by the Civil Judge, Jr. Divn., Vasco in Execution application no.12/2009/C dismissing the objection of the petitioners,judgment debtors. Having heard the learned counsel and having perused the record, I am of the considered opinion that no case has been made out for interference with the impugned order. The impugned order is in consonance with the decree passed by the appellate court. It is also pertinent to note that the second appeal filed by the petitioners was also dismissed. As such, the objections taken by the petitioners if accepted would amount to varying the decree which is not permissible. Mr. Bhobe, learned counsel for the petitioners further states that the petitioners are given time of six months to comply with the decree and the period will expire on 30/12/2010 and as such, the petitioners be granted further time to comply with the order. The petition challenging order dated 30/6/2010 was filed on 16/8/2010 and was mentioned for urgent circulation on 10/12/2010. As such, I am not inclined to grant any extension of time in favour of the petitioners. However, the petitioners are at liberty to seek extension before the Executing Court. Needless to mention that if such an application is filed before the Executing Court, the Executing court shall deal with the said application in accordance with law. The writ petition stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ap/-