IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 270 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 252 OF 2009 DR. SRICRISHNA BALCHANDRE KENKRE (DECEASED) THROUGH LR'S AND ANR ... Applicant Versus MR. UMAKANT BALCHANDRA KENKRE (DECEASED) THROUGH LR'S AND 4 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. S.D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. Kankonkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Ajit R. Kantak, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5. Mr. M. Sonak, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. Coram:- D. G. KARNIK & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 20th September, 2010 P.C. 1. By this application, the applicant prays for an injunction restraining the respondents from alienating or transferring the suit property. The appellant filed a suit for setting aside an alienation. The suit has been dismissed by the trial Court. The appeal against the decision of the trial Court has been admitted in which the present application is made. 2. In our view, Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act sufficiently protects the interest of the appellant. We, however, direct that in any event the respondents want to transfer the suit property or any part thereof, they shall inform to every purchaser/transferee about the pendency of the appeal and shall mention about the pendency of the appeal in the every deed of sale/alienation or agreement for sale/alienation to be made by them. Needless to say, the alienation, if any, made by the respondents during the pendency of the appeal shall be subject to the result of the appeal unless the specific permission therefore is obtained under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act prior to the sale/alienation. 3. Civil Application is disposed of. D. G. KARNIK, J. F. M. REIS, J. at*