1 cri appln 1111.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1111 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant Versus Ramchandra Baburao Nalawade .. Respondent Shri T. S. Lodhe, A.P.P. for the Applicant/State. Shri R. P. Adgaonkar, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : S. S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 31ST JANUARY, 2011. PER COURT : . Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the applicant/State and learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. Upon perusal of impugned judgment and record and proceedings which is made available, it appears that, it is admitted position that complainant turned hostile. In this view of the matter, entertaining this matter further would be futile exercise. No other evidence has been brought before this Court so 2 cri appln 1111.10 as to take different view than taken by the learned Special Court. It is well settled principle of law that, even if the another view is possible on the basis of evidence brought on record, that is not ground to interfere in the order of acquittal. 3. For the reasons stated above, I do not find any merit in this application seeking leave to file appeal from the judgment and order in Special Case No. 03/2007 dated 14.12.2009 passed by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge - 2, Latur stands refused. The application stands rejected. [S. S. SHINDE, J.] bsb/Jan. 11