WP(C) 6127/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. GOSWAMI Heard Mr. H.R. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. J. Pato wary, learned Standing counsel, PWD. The grievance of the petitioner as projected in the writ application is that, in terms of various work orders issued by the respondent No.3, the petitioner had completed the works in question to the satisfaction of the authorities and a sum of Rs.8,22,184/,- which is, admittedly, payable to him, has not been paid inspi te of repeated requests made. The learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the issue raised in th is writ petition is squarely covered by the Full Bench decision of this Court re ndered in the case of Tamsher Ali & others vrs State of Assam & others, reported in 2008(4)GLT 1 and therefore, submit that this writ petition can be disposed o f in terms of the guidelines and directions contained in the aforesaid judgment. In view of the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, thi s writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to deal with the grievances expressed by the petitioner in terms of the directions, guideline s and observations made in the case of Tamsher Ali & others (supra).