CWP No.12986/2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION: 12.10.2010 Sucheta Swami and another ...Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI PRESENT: Mr.GS Kaura, Advocate for the petitioners Mr.RD Sharma, DAG, Haryana for respondents no.1 to 5 Mr.ND Achint, Advocate for respondents no.7 to 10 Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) This petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondents no.1 to 6 not to help the private respondents in the complaint filed by the petitioners. On 7.9.2010, the parties were called and they were given opportunity to interact with each other and thereafter the matter was taken up. However, it appeared that father of the girl is adamant and is against any mutual settlement. Women Cell/Protection Officer was then asked to file status report. In the status report filed in the form of affidavit, it is stated that the petitioner has not cooperated with the enquiry made by the Enquiry Officer, despite communication on mobile and landline numbers as also written notice. The complaint was lodged by the petitioner before the CWP No.12986/2010 2 concerned police. The petitioner herself is not cooperating with the enquiry. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would cooperate with the enquiry in the complaint filed by her within a period of 10 days. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with the observation that the Women Cell/Protection Officer may proceed according to law after granting opportunity to the petitioner to record her statement. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 12.10. 2010 MFK CWP No.10585 of 2010 3