IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6001 of 2011 MUKESH YADAV SON OF GORELAL YADAV. ------------- PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that he is ready to keep the complainant with full dignity and honour. This stand of the petitioner gets reflected from the impugned order also. It is also submitted that the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 800/- per month to the complainant from May, 2011. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) 2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Complaint Case No. 649C/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Let the learned court below issue notice to the complainant and if she is willing to resume the conjugal life, the petitioner will take back the complainant to her matrimonial house to keep her with full dignity and honour. If the matrimonial harmony is substantially restored then the petitioner is not required to make any payment. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)