WPMS No. 1850 of 2009 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. By means of the petition, the petitioner has prayed to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 04.04.2009 passed by IInd Additional Civil Judge (S.D.), Dehradun in Civil Suit No. 713 of 2005 as well as judgment dated 23.10.2009 passed by Additional District Judge/1st F.T.C., Dehradun in Civil Revision No. 46 of 2009. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner Jagdish Kumar filed a civil suit before the Civil Judge (S.D.) and the court concerned appointed the Amin of the Civil Court to submit his report with regard to the situation of the property in question vide order dated 26.08.2006. On the direction of the trial court, the Amin filed his report before the court concerned. The petitioner moved an application before the trial court for appointment of Survey Commission, which was dismissed vide order dated 04.04.2009. Feeling aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner preferred a revision, which was also dismissed vide order dated 23.10.2009. Hence, the petitioner preferred this petition before this Court for setting aside the aforesaid orders. Heard Sri T.A. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record available before me. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued before the Court that the Amin has no power to measure the land in question. He was appointed only for the purpose of inspection. In order to support his case he has relied upon decision of High Court of Bombay, 2008(4) Civil Court Cases 386 (Bombay), Smt. Shamlat & others Vs Vishwaswara Tukaram Giripunje & another. After going through the citation placed before me, I find that the citation is not applicable in the present case. As far as the submission advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner is concerned, there is no force in the submission advanced by him. The revisional court has rightly dismissed the revision after considering the evidence available on record. I do not find any illegality in the impugned orders passed by the courts below. The petition lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in- limine. (B.C.K., J.) 06.11.2009 ASWAL