IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 20246 of 2010 Date of Decision: 10.12.2010. Rajender Kumar and another --Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Rajiv Doon, Advocate for the petitioners. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) The petitioners claim for allotment of plots under oustees' quota has been rejected vide the impugned order dated 22.7.2010 on the ground that the petitioner did not apply within the time fixed in the advertisement. It is not in dispute that the petitioners' land was acquired for development of Sectors 6,7, 8 and 9, Jind. Under the policy framed by the respondents the oustees are entitled to plot of land for which the oustees has to apply within the time prescribed as and when the applications are invited. Respondents invited applications for allotment of plots to oustees' whose land was acquired and they were required to apply by 28.2.2007, the last date fixed for making such applications. The petitioners seem to have made some representation but respondents took no action on such representation which forced the petitioners to file a writ petition being CWP No. 7236 of 2010 which came to be disposed of by this Court vide order dated 23.4.2010 asking the respondents to decide the representation by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing. As a consequence of the aforesaid direction, the respondents have passed the impugned order. The main ground for rejection is that the petitioners never applied in response to CWP. No. 20246 of 2010 -2- the advertisement. There is nothing on record to indicate that petitioners ever applied in response to the advertisement. I do not find any infirmity in the impugned order. Petition dismissed. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 10.12.2010. lucky