IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8271 of 2009 SUNIL KUMAR YADAV SON OF VISHNUDEO YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TARATOL BARAHI, P.S. JAINAGAR, DISTRICT MADHUBANI. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 08-05-2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner produces certified copy of the compromise petition filed on behalf of the parties in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani. Let it be kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioners seeks bail in a case under sections 307, 379/34 and other ancillary sections of the I.P.C. as well as section 27 of the Arms Act in which seven persons are named as accused and the petitioner is one of them. The informant/ Mukhia of Dullipatti Panchayat has alleged that while he was returning from Jainagar Block on his motorcycle, in the way the informant was restrained and he was forced to sit on the Bolero vehicle and later on he was assaulted by the butt of pistol by two accused persons. Submission is that section 27 of the Arms Act is not made out because no firearm was used. Later on the informant has filed a compromise petition saying that he is - 2 - not willing to contest the matter. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in Jainagar P.S. Case No. 252 of 2008. ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J ) BTiwary/