IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39745 of 2009 1. AJAY KUMAR JHA 2. Sulochana Devi Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 19/01/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners who are husband and wife apprehend arrest in a complaint case under Sections- 420, 427, 423, 467, 468 and 120B of Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the State submits that the cognizance has been taken against the petitioners in 2002 itself, the revision and applications under Section-482 Cr.P.C. against which have also been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter relates to a saw mill licence for which the complainant had unsuccessfully filed C.W.J.C. No.8475/99. Considering the nature of the tug of war going on between the parties for the saw mill let the petitioners above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of 2 Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri. V. Kumar learned Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Complaint Case No.34/02. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)