HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETJTIONER WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3022 of2007 : 1. Smt. Manju Mishra Aged about 47 Years, W/o. Shri Jagdish Mishra, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Arjuni, Kanker. 2. Smt. Kalpana Haldar Aged about 44 Years, W/o. Shri R.N.Haldar Assistant Teaeher, Primary School Bevrati, Kanker. 3. Ku. Shail bala Chand Aged about 47 Years, D/o. Late Alfrade Chand Assistant Teacher, Primary School Marvada Lal Kanker. 4. Sunder Singh Kashysp Aged about 43 Years, S/o. Shri Somnath Kashyap Assistant Teacher, jS/fiddle School Nathiva Gaon. ^'Ul are at Block Kanker, Distt. Kaiiker (C.G.) RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretarv, Schoo! Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director Public Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer Kanker District Karicer (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer Kaiueer (C.G.) 5. Treasury & Funds Dspartment Kanker (C.G.) WRrr pETmoN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THECQNSTnunON OFINDIA, Present: Sinsle Bench : Hon'bie Justice Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. Mr. D.N.Prajapati, Advoeate for the petitioner. Miss Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for ths State/respondents. -»- (Passed on llfh day ofMay, 2007) The question of law involved herein is asto whether ths petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f the date of initial appoiatment or from the date ofeompletion ofprobation period. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for fhe State/resoondents jointlv submit that the facts and auestion of law involved in the present writ petition are the same as to that of in W.P.(S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh & Others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. In visw of fhe above-stated submissions made by leamed counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. TJiakm- Sd/- SatishK.Agnitott1 ]udge