IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 1635 of 2010(D) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- T.B.REMA, D/O.BHASKARA PILLAI, AGED 50 YEARS, SREE VALSAM, KRISHNAPURAM, KAYAMKULAM. NOW WORKING AS CLERK, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER, K.S.R.T.C.KAYAMKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SRI.V.VIJULAL RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE KERALA STATE TRANSPORT WORKERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.T.133, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THAMPANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. 3. THE ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER, K.S.R.T.C., KAYAMKULAM. 4. N.P.VARGHESE, NALUKANDATHIL, VARAPPUZHA P.O., ERNAKULAM. 5. SUSAN CHACKO, MURINDASSERIL, KOTTARAKAVU, MAVELIKKARA P.O. ADV. SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR,SC, KSRTC FOR R1TO3 SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR,SC, KSRTC FOR R1,3 SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN,SC KSTW CO.OP SOCIET FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J -------------------------------------- W.P(C).NO.1635 OF 2010 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of April, 2010. J U D G M E N T The complaint of the petitioner is that recoveries were being made from her salary towards the debt due from the 4th respondent. The petitioner was the surety for a loan availed by the 4th respondent. It is submitted that the 4th respondent has retired from service and his retirement benefits are due from the first respondent. It is also submitted that the 4th respondent has consented to the amounts due to the second respondent being recovered from the DCRG of the 4th respondent. The complaint of the respondent is that in spite of the above, the amount has not been paid to the second respondent. The standing counsel for the first respondent submits that the first respondent has no objection to recovering the amount due to the second respondent from the DCRG of the 4th respondent and paying the same to the 2nd respondent. 2. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to recover the amount due W.P(C).NO.1635 OF 2010 2 from the 4th respondent to the second respondent, from the retirement benefits of the 4th respondent and to pay the same to the second respondent within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. K.SURENDRAMOHAN, JUDGE. pm