IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 359 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Smt. Sneh Lata W/o Aditya Chaudhary 2. Aditya Chaudhary S/o Bishambhar Singh Both R/o Village Kheda Jat, P.S. Manglaur, District Haridwar. …….. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Senior Superintendent of Police, Haridwar. 2. Station House Officer, P.S. Manglaur, District Haridwar. 3. Smt. Preeti W/o Priyank Chaudhary, D/o Late Bhupendra Singh, Presently R/o Village Bahadarpur Jat, P.S. Pathri, District Haridwar. ……. Respondents Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent No. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent No. 3. 2. Mr. H.C. Pande, the learned Addl. Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners Smt. Sneh Lata and Aditya Chaudhary seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them, now, has become infructuous, as the Police, after the completion of the investigation, has filed charge sheet against the petitioners before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 01.07.2006 01.07.2006 G