IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33922 of 2010 PERVEZ AKHTAR @ MD. PRAVEZ AKHTAR @ MD. AKHTAR PRAVEZ Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 04.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. It appears that petitioner and other accused persuaded the complainant to take loan from a private company to facilitate their business and subsequently, they collected these amounts from the informant in the name of processing the loan. Admittedly, co-accused Md. Israr and Md. Reyaz is the father and brother of the petitioner, respectively have already been granted bail by the C.J.M, Ara and both the aforesaid co-accused persons are continuously depositing the amount in question with the concerned court. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions petitioner, namely, Parvez Akhtar @ Md. Pravez Akhtar @ Md. Akhtar Pravez @ Md. Parvej Akhtar @ Akhtar Parvej @ Akhtar Pervaj, in the event of his arrest/surrender within thirty days from the 2 date of communication of this order, shall be released on bail in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 169 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Ara subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. It is also made clear that if the above stated co- accused persons commit default in depositing the payment with the court concerned then in that circumstance the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)