HK»<COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT KLASnjR W.P. (C) No. 5116 of 2007 PETmONER RESPONDENTS Smt. Lalita Devi Kumar, Wfo Shri Trigart Kumar, Aged sAout 50 yeas, Ex-Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Sanlar-Jwik, Tahsil and District Mahasamund (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of ChhatU^arh through fte Secretaiy, Department of Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. Coltector, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (CG). 3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pithora, Tahsil and Disfa-ict Mahasamund (CG). 4. Prssiding Officer & Naib Tahsitdar, Pithora, Tahsil aml District Mahasamund (CG). 5. Sub-Divisional OfRcer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (CG). 6. Shri S.K. Jsuswat, Collector, Mahasamund, Distrfet Mahasamund (CG). 7. DX.. Verma, Sub-Divisfonal Officer, Mahasamund, Dishtet h4ahasamund yX3). 8. The Secretary, Gram Panchayat Sankara- Jonk, Tahsil and Oistrict Mahasamund (CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjTION OF INDIA) Sinate Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Present : ShriRaghaven*aPradhan,AdvocateforUiepetitk>ner. Shri Vivek Sharma, Panel Lawyer fw the State/respondent No. 1,2,4and5. WVDER (Passed on 23rd ofAugust, 2007) LCTned counsel appearmg for the petiUoner, on inshuctions, sitomits that fte petifioner does not warrt to press other polrts, exce(< thsrt the reference pending before the Coltector, Mahasamund, under SecBon,21<4) of Chhatti^arh Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj AtUiiniyam, 1993, flor short Ihe Adhmiyam, 1993') be coreidered and deeided in accordance witti taw, expedifiously, to which the teamed counsel appearing for tte Stat^respondent No. 1,2,4 and 5 has no objection. ^JL^A. The CollectDr, Mahasimund, wherein ttre reference under Sedion 21(4) of the Adhiniyam, 1993, is pending consideration, is directed to conshler and decide the same in accordance wift law, on fts cwn merit, expedffiously, as far as possibte, within a period of two months from the date of passing of thfe order. In view ofthe above, this petiUon stands diqwsed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sdiu t