IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32369 of 2009 BHUPENDRA RAJAK @ BHUPENDRA BAITHA @ SANJEEVAN JEE Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 16.03.2011 This case has been brought under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of learned counsel for the petitioner who points out that in the earlier order dated 11.9.2009 while directing the court below to conclude the trial of the petitioner, the relevant police case number has not been mentioned as a result whereof court below is not in a position to carry out the direction given thereunder. When a communication has already been made by the Office vide Memo no. 23136-37 dated 5.12.2009 as with regard to the aforementioned order dated 11.9.2009 which was with regard to release of the petitioner on bail in connection with Guraru P. S. Case No. 20 of 2009, there would be no need to mention the case number again inasmuch as it will be understood that the directions given in the order dated 11.9.2009 was in respect of concluding the trial within the prescribed period as with regard to trial arising out Guraru P. S. Case No. 20 of 2009. 2 That being so, there would be no need to modify the order dated 11.9.2009. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)