IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31574 of 2010 1.BHOLA MISTRY, Son of Late Mathura Mistry 2.SATISH MISTRY, Son of Bhola Mistry 3.MITHILESH MISTRY, Son of Mathura Mistry All Resident of Village Sorihpur, P.S. Warisaliganj, District Nawadah. ……..Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……..Opposite Party 02/- 08-11-2010 Heard learned counsel for the three petitioners, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Petitioners are named accused in this case instituted on the basis of Complaint Case No. 1090 of 2008 with specific allegation of demolishing the house and taking away the properties. No doubt, the petitioners claim themselves as purchasers of share of a co- sharer, but from the deed in question it does not appear that over the lands purchased by them any house was in existence. Considering the facts and circumstances, I do not find it a fit case where the privilege sought for may be granted, accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 10 of 2009 pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawadah is hereby rejected. Praveen (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)