1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 5849/2010. Mehboob Abdul Aalam Surtane -: VERSUS :- State of Maharashtra and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : DECEMBER 09, 2010. Heard Shri S.K. Sable, learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 3. It is apparent that the petitioner has lost right to purchase and those proceedings reached right upto to this Court and orders against petitioner have been maintained. Because of that respondents are now seeking restoration of possession. Learned Counsel for petitioner states that the petitioner has got crops standing and hence at least time till February, 2011 should be given to harvest those crops. Learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 to 3 has opposed the petitioner. 2 As I do not find any jurisdictional error or perversity in the judgment delivered by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. However, petitioner is at liberty to move the Tahsildar for grant of time, if the same is permissible in law. Writ Petition is accordingly rejected. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.