IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 1035 of 2008 Date of Decision: 11. 11. 2008 Jagsir Singh ...... Appellant Versus Gurbax Singh and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. I.S.Brar, Advocate for the appellant. **** Ajay Tewari, J. This appeal has been filed against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below dismissing the suit of the appellant challenging the sale deed dated 8.5.90 on the ground that after a family settlement the vendor could not have executed the same being beyond his share. Both the Courts have held the said family settlement to be not proved. It has been further held that in a earlier suit bearing Civil Suit No. 423 of 9.6.90 filed by the appellant against respondent No.1 the same family settlement had been relied upon but even in that case the Court had held the family settlement to be not proved. Learned counsel has not been able to deny that that judgment has become final as no appeal is pending against the same. In the circumstances I hold that the questions of law proposed do not arise in the present appeal. Consequently the same is dismissed. No costs. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE November, 2008 sunita