IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6227 of 2010 1. M/S RAUNAK TRADE & AGENCIES PRIVATE LIMITED, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT LIBRARY ROAD, WARD NO.4, FARBISGANJ, DISTT.- ARARIA, THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, MANGI LAL GOLCHA S/O LATE GORDHAN DAS GOLCHA R/O LIBRARY ROAD, WARD NO.4, FARBISGANJ, P.S.- FARBISGANJ, DISTT.- ARARIA Versus 1. THE BIHAR INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY UDYOG BHAWAN, EAST GANDHI MAIDAN, PATNA, THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BIHAR INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, UDYOG BHAWAN, EAST GANDHI MAIDAN, PATNA 3. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BIHAR INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, LARGE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, BARARI, DISTT.- BHAGALPUR 4. THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BIHAR INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REGIONAL OFFICE, LARGE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, BARARI, DISTT.- BHAGALPUR ----------- 2 4.5.2010 The petitioner was allotted land by Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority at Farbisganj Industrial Area for setting up of an industry. On the ground of not setting up of industry, the allotment was to be cancelled. When petitioner was asked for time because of some personal difficulty, which was also rejected on the ground that that earlier time, as prayed for, had been granted. Petitioner has paid the entire amount that was required to be paid for the industrial plot, which is now to be cancelled and re-allotted. petitioner wants another six months to set up an industry and undertakes that if within six months he is unable to establish an industry at the site, he would vacate the premises. Having considered the matter and Hard Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Senior Counsel appearing for BIADA, in my view, 2 the request of learned counsel for the petitioner is just and proper . Industry cannot be put in any time schedule like a railway time table. There are various factors that may be kept in mind. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that family of the petitioner was undergoing to suffer because of kidnapping and murder of family member. They had intended to set up an industry and as such invested their hard earned money in getting the plot. In my view the offer of the petitioner is just, fair and equitable. I therefore, restrain BIADA from creating any third party entrance in the property and also restrain from canceling the allotment. In case the petitioner is unable to establish an industry by the end of October, 2010, BIADA would then proceed to take action as per law. With the above observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Singh (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)