1 PGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No.9935 of 2009 M/s.Rajendra Trading Company .. .. Petitioner v/s. 1.Tasgaon Taluka Sahakari Kharedi Vikri Sangh Ltd. Tasgaon & ors. .. Respondents Mr.Vijay Mane for Petitioner. Mr.T.I. Ingale for Res.No.2. ----- CORAM : SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 23rd February, 2010 P.C. : 1.Rule, returnable forthwith. 2.The Writ Petitioner as well as two others being one Rashtriya Chemical and Fertilizers Ltd. (RCF) and Renuka Krishna Sevakendra were three parties who were allotted certain plots on lease by Respondent No.1. There have been identical separate proceedings by and between these parties and Respondent No.1. Upon the orders being passed by the relevant Authority, execution came to be levied and ultimately culminated in the order directing handing over of possession. 2 3.The Petitioner filed earlier Writ Petitions when this aspect came to be considered. The reliefs prayed for by the Petitioner in the earlier Writ Petitions were also considered and seen that for identical reliefs numerous Petitions have been filed to evade handing over of possession. Yet in this Petition, the Petitioner has contended that the order passed against RCF is sought to be executed against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has not produced the order passed in the lis which was between the Petitioner and Respondent No. 1. Respondent No.2 has produced the relevant order. Due process of law has been followed. 4.Under the circumstances aforesaid, there is absolutely no error shown in the impugned order. The Writ Petition has no merit. It is dismissed only with the clarification that the order which is passed against the Petitioner shall be executed against the Petitioner. Rule is discharged accordingly. 5.No order as to costs. (SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.)