IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.3106 of 2010 DATE:01.04.2010 Between: Punukollu Sivaramakrishna and 2 others. …… Petitioners/Accused. And: Yarlagadda Veerakumari and another. …..Respondents. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.3106 of 2010 ORDER: This petition is filed by A-1 to A-3 in Crime No.23 of 2010 of Challapalli Police Station relating to offences punishable under Sections 354, 326, 324, 506 and 34 I.P.C. It is alleged that on 05.03.2010 at about 6.00 P.M when the 1st respondent/defacto- complainant was in her field alone, A-1 came there in drunken state and fell on her shoulders and that when she questioned, A-1 pulled her by holding her hands towards his chest and hugged her and forcibly thrown her on ground and sat on her stomach and had torn her jacket and squeezed her breasts and that when she raised cries, A-2 came there and abused her in filthy language by holding her tuft and hair and beat her four times and that A-3 also came there with a rod proclaiming to kill her and that the accused beat persons who came to her rescue and caused bleeding injuries. These allegations prima facie attract the offences for which the crime was registered. 2) It is contended by the petitioners’ counsel that on the previous day, the 2nd petitioner gave report to the police against the prosecution party herein and it was registered as case in Crime No.22 of 2010 for offence punishable under Sections 324/34 I.P.C and that the present case is foisted with false allegations as counter blast to the case filed by the 2nd petitioner, with malafide intention. Both the cases are registered on one and the same date i.e., on 05.03.2010. Truth or falsity of the case in Crime No.23 of 2010 cannot be gone into and decided in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. It is for the police to investigate into the matter and to come to appropriate conclusion and file final report before the Magistrate. Simply because there is another case registered at the instance of the 2nd petitioner/A-2, one cannot jump to the conclusion that this crime is false or motivated. It is for the police to investigate into both the crimes and arrive at a proper conclusion based on proper evidence. There are no merits in this petition. 3) Hence, the petition is dismissed. _______________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J April 1, 2010 KSH