'etltioners ^^SSS^^iSa; •iffs. rai Somnat'n, aged about 58 years, S/o Udeychand Aghariya. Sn-,t. Sagunmoti, aged about 73 years, W/o Udeychand Aghanya Both R/o vii!age Durgapali, Pahvari haika No. 23, Revenue Circle Bavarpur, Tehsil Saraipall. Smt. Panbudi, aged abut 61 years, D/o Udeychand, W/'o Ghasiya Aghariya, R/o viilage Loharsl, Thana Jagdalpur Tehsi'i Padampur, District Bargarh (Orissa) • Resoondsnts 1 Smt. Sumitra Bai, aged abo'jt 49 years, Dafendants D/o Udeychand Aghariya, W/o Chetan Aghanya, R/o Village Jagdalpur, Thana Jagdalpur Tehsii Padampur, D9istrict Bargarh (Orissa), 2. State of Chhatti^arh through Cotiector, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, CG Writ Pstitlon under Anicle 227 of the Constitution of tndla uresent: Shri 1-i.S Patei counsel for the petitioneFS. (Passed on 25s' Octo&e,' 2007) According to the counsel for the .pstitioners certain argumsnts were advanced before the Appeliate Authority. However, the same were not taken into consideration. Learned counsel submits that this petition may be disposed of v»'ith a direction to the Appeiiate Authoritv to consider and decide ths review petition to be filed 'oy ihe appellants. Accordingly, it would be open for the petitloners to fiie the review petition within a •<i'eek which v»'ould be considered and decided bv the Appellate Authority on merits. Liberiy is granted to the petitioners to approach this Court again, if occasion srises. The petition is thus disposed of. Sd/- ActingChiefJustice 7 L