IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T)No. 3248 of 2008. Date of decision: 3.7.2009 Dr.Raj Kumar …. Petitioner Versus State of H.P & ors. .... Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Surinder Singh, J. Whether approved for reporting ? For the petitioner: Mr.S.D.Gill, Advocate. For the respondents: Sh.R.K.Bawa, Advocate General with Sh.R.M.Bhisht and Rajesh Mandhotra, Dy.Advocate Generals for respondents. Deepak Gupta, J.(Oral) Sh.S.D.Gill, learned counsel for the petitioner states that as far as prayer No.(i) is concerned, the same does not survive since the petitioner has already adjusted at the place of his choice. The petitioner’s main grievance is with regard to the prayer No.(ii) whereby he had prayed that the respondents be directed to release the salary of the applicant. Mr.Gill states that his client shall be satisfied in case a direction is issued to the concerned officer to dispose of this request of the petitioner in accordance with law within a specified period. In case the petitioner makes a representation to the Principal Secretary (Health) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh on or before 31st July, 2009 making a prayer for release of salary, the Principal Secretary (Health) shall after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner dispose of the representation within three months thereafter. Needless to say that if the decision is against the petitioner, he shall be at liberty to approach this Court again. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Dasti copy. ( Deepak Gupta ) Judge July 3, 2009 (Surinder Singh) (m) Judge