Against the judgment and order dated 26.3.2008 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge FTC No .IV, Jehanabad in Cr. Appeal no. 88/2006/01/2008. -------------- CRIMINAL REVISION No.513 OF 2008 Ramdeo Prasad @ Harilal S/o Late Shankar Sao resident of village Nabiganj Sharen @ Tehta P.S. Makhdumpur Dist. Jehanabad Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR-------------------------Opposite party ---------------- For the petitioner: Mr Krishna Singh, Sr.Advocate For the Opposite party: Mr J. Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ------------- P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANDHATA SINGH ------------- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. After arguing the case at length, learned counsel for the petitioner centralizes himself only on the point of quantum of sentence awarded to the petitioner. In this regard submission is that for the same allegation, he(petitioner) was facing departmental enquiry also and that ended in his dismissal from service which is more than any punishment can be awarded by a criminal court. He has remained in custody since 7.8.1995 to 23.8.1995 (during trial) and 13.5.2008 to 3.6.2008 (after conviction). Learned counsel for the State is present and he conceds the fact raised on behalf of the petitioner. A title suit filed on behalf of the informant was dismissed. So the validity of the deed through which any crime was committed remained in- tact. Therefore, the period undergone by the petitioner till today can be observed sufficient towards the sentence awarded to him. I agree with the submission. Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed with this - 2 - modification in the sentence. (Mandhata Singh, J) The Patna High Court The 5th August, 2009 shahid/ NAFR