IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5713 of 2010 01. DAYANAND MANJHI 02. Ram Bahadur Manjhi Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 26/02/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence is of false implication under Sections 307, 323, 324, 450, 452, 380 of the Penal Code when he is not named, while the named accused have been granted bail by the A.C.J.M., Danapur leading to presumption under Section 307 found not to be applicable. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.P. Sukla, J.M. Ist Class, Danapur in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 84 of 2008. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)