1 lpa391-11.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.391/2011 Yuvraj Kondiba Nale .. Appellant Versus 1] The State Election Commission and another. .. Respondents ... Shri S.S.Choudhari,Adv.for appellant. Shri S.T.Shelke,Adv.for Election Commission. ... CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL AND T.V.NALAWADE, JJ. DATE : 9th DECEMBER ,2011 ORAL ORDER : 1] The learned counsel for the appellant Shri S.S.Choudhari submits that the appellant’s nomination ought not to have been rejected on account of the allegation that the appellant had 2 lpa391-11.odt financial interest in the work carried out by the municipal council. 2] We have perused the impugned orders passed by the learned District Judge and the learned Single Judge of this Court. Considering the provisions of Section 16(1) (i) and 16(3A) of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965, the learned District Judge and the learned Single Judge adopted the view, which according to us, is a proper and reasonable view in the facts of the case. It is submitted that the voting for the said election is to take place on 13th December 2011. Therefore, no interference is warranted. Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. (T.V.NALAWADE, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.) umg/lpa391-11