{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 11 OF 2004 Jitendra Shantilal Mutha PETITIONER VERSUS Managing Committee, Grave Yard & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. P.F.Patni, Advocate for petitioner Mr. L.B.Sayed h/f Mr.S.S.Kazi Advocate for respondent No.1 ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 19th March 2010 PER COURT: 1. It appears that respondent No.1 had filed RCS No. 13/2001 before the Maharashtra Wakf Tribunal, Aurangabad against the appellant and respondent No.2. The said suit was in respect of the recovery of possession of the properties mentioned in para 1 of the said suit i.e. area admeasuring 124 feet east-west, 40feet north-south, a part of old survey No.77. Municiapl No. 5-15-111/2/3 CTS No.17379 and 17380 situated at Kranti Chowk, Aurangabad, boundaries of the said property are also given in the said suit. Application for temporary injunction was also filed in the said suit, which was granted. {2} 2. In the present Civil Revision Application, the order of injunction is under challenge. According to learned counsel for the applicant, subsequent to the impugned order dated 06.09.2002, the Wakf Board, has executed a lease deed in favour of the applicant-original defendant No.2. Initially, the lease period was for 3 years i.e. commencing from 16.11.2005 and was renewable at the option of the parties. According to the learned counsel for the applicant, after expiry of the previous lease period, the same has been renewed. Zerox copy of the lease deed executed in the year 2004 is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. In view of this subsequent development, it is urged that now the civil revision application has become infructuous. Accordingly, the civil revision application is disposed of as infructuous with no order as to costs. Rule issued on 24.02.2005 stands discharged accordingly. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/cra11-04 {3} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9270 OF 2003 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 11 OF 2004 Jitendra Shantilal Mutha APPLICANT VERSUS Managing Committee, Grave Yard & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. P.F.Patni, Advocate for applicant Mr. L.B.Sayed h/f Mr.S.S.Kazi Advocate for respondent No.1 ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 19th March 2010 PER COURT: 1. As the civil revision application No.11/2004 is disposed of, the present civil application does not survive and hence disposed of accordingly. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/cra11-04