IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30567 of 2010 HEMA DEVI D/O LATE DAYANAND THAKUR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HASSANPUR, RANIGANJ, WARD NO.8, P.S. RANIGANJ, DISTT. ARARIA AND WIFE OF SRI SANJAY THAKUR, SON OF SRI SURYA NARAYAN THAKUR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JATUA, WARD NO.18, P.S. VIRATNAGAR, DISTT. VIRATNAGAR (NEPAL) ….. PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SANJAY THAKUR, SON OF SRI SURYA NARAYAN THAKUR 3. SURYA NARAYAN THAKUR SON OF LATE ACHMIT THAKUR 4. MANJU KUMARI D/O SURYA NARAYAN THAKUR 5. GAJENDRA THAKUR, SON OF AMIRI THAKUR 6. ANJU DEVI WIFE OF SRI GAJENDRA THAKUR 7. AMIRI THAKUR SON OF NOT KNOWN 8. SANJAY THAKUR SON OF LATE RAMJIT THAKUR 9. REKHA DEVI WIFE OF SRI SANJAY THAKUR 10. DINESH THAKUR, SON OF YOGANAND THAKUR 11. ROHINI DEVI WIFE OF DINESH THAKUR, OPPOSITE PARTIES NO.2 TO 4 ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JATUA, WARD NO.18, P.S. AND DISTRICT VIRAT NAGAR (NEPAL) PERMANENT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PATHARDEO, O.P. PHULKAHA, P.S. RANJIGANJ, DISTRICT ARARIA, OPPOSITE PARTIES NO.5 TO 7 ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JANAKPUR, P.S. JANAKPUR, DISTT- SITAMARHI, OPPOSITE PARTIES NO.8 AND 9 ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARANNA RANIGANJ, P.S. RANIGANJ, DISTRICT ARARIA, OPPOSITE PARTY NO.10 AND 11 ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JAGATA KHARSHAHI, P.S. RANIGANJ, DISTRICT ARARIA ….. OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 8.9.2010 The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 16.3.2010 passed by the Sessions Judge, Purnia in Criminal Revision No.15/103 of 2010, by which he has set aside the order of cognizance on the point of territorial jurisdiction even though the petitioner had come against the order of cognizance only against limited persons. In my view, since the order impugned is well - 2 - considered and in fact the complaint does not make out any offence within the jurisdiction of Araria, this application is dismissed. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )