- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1412 OF 1999 State Bank of India ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents Mr.Bhave i/b Bhave and Co. for Petitioner Smt.S.M.Dandekar AGP for Respondent-State CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 14, 2006 DATE : NOVEMBER 14, 2006 DATE : NOVEMBER 14, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.P. for the State. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the issues involved in the present writ petition, are squarely covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in (1999) 5 SCC 708; ICICI Vs. State of (1999) 5 SCC 708; ICICI Vs. State of (1999) 5 SCC 708; ICICI Vs. State of Maharashtra and others. Maharashtra and others. Maharashtra and others. The learned A.G.P. appearing for the State, also states that issues involved in the present writ petition are squarely covered by the decision in ICICI Vs.State of ICICI Vs.State of ICICI Vs.State of Maharashtra (supra). Maharashtra (supra). Maharashtra (supra). In these circumstances, Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). No order as to costs. [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] - 2 - [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]