1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4380 of 2011 Bro. Henson George ...Petitioner Versus Congregation of the Missionery of St. Francis of Assisi & Others ...Respondents Ms.Ruchi Hajare i/b. M.Janardhanan for Petitioner. Mr. Uday Warunjikar for the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 Mr.P.P.Kakade, AGP for Respondent No.5 CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED:- 20th JULY, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the respondent management. The preliminary objection regarding maintainability of this petition is raised. Even if we were to ignore the preliminary objection on merits we find no reason to interfere with the order of transfer as it is not the case of the petitioner that the Management had no authority to transfer the petitioner. In other 2 words the transfer being one of the condition of service, the petitioner is bound to abide by the said discipline. To get over this position, Counsel for the petitioner submits that the transfer is in order to victimise the petitioner as he had made representation to the Charity Commissioner against the irregularities committed by the Management of the Public Trust. In our opinion, no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is warranted in the facts and circumstances of the present case. 2. Hence petition is dismissed. (R.Y.GANOO, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)