IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22853-2011 (O&M) Date of decision:29.07.2011. Jatinder ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Naveen Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case registered vide FIR No.230 dated 15.03.2011, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 IPC, Police Station City, Karnal. The allegation contained in the FIR is that the petitioner Jatinder had entered into an agreement to sell house in dispute to the complainant Amit Kumar for a sum of `10,70,000/- and received an amount of `4,50,000/- towards earnest money from him. However, it has been found later on that the petitioner was not the owner of the said house as it was owned by Neelam Khurana. Learned counsel for the petitioner has tried to persuade this Court with the receipts indicating refund of earnest money to the complainant Amit Kumar. However, the true copies of Annexures P-5 and P-6 are silent about the the signatures of Amit Kumar because in Annexure P-5 there are no signatures of Amit Kumar and Annexure P-6 bears the signatures of Anil Kumar After taking into consideration the facts and circumstances, I do not find it to be a case for grant of pre-arrest bail. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. July 29, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE