IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25245 of 2011 Amarendra Kumar Pandey, son of Sri Mahendra Narain Pandey, resident of village – Narayanpur Khairy, P.S. – Tajpur Pusa Road, District – Samastipur. ----------- Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ------Opposite Party ****** 03. 03.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, heard learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State who is armed with carbon copy of the case diary. Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Tajpur Pusa Road P.S. Case No. 27/2011 for offences under Sections 406/420/467/468 of the Indian Penal Code, is named accused in this case with allegation of causing defalcation of Rs. 2,82,000/- around during his tenure. Submission is that on the basis of paragraph 18 of the case diary is that no dues was found against the petitioner at the time of he being relieved but subsequently behind his back on the basis of some audit report above amount is shown against him. However, already Rs. 40,000/- has been deposited by the petitioner. The petitioner further objects the audit report and submission is that if in his presence thorough audit in account is made by competent authority especially by chartered accountant he is ready to pay the amount, if any comes against him. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, subject to result of fresh auditing or case within eight weeks on deposit of the amount with a liberty to pray for installments before the competent authority who may consider and pass appropriate order, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with Tajpur Pusa Road P.S. Case No. 27/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)