IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.102 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.218 OF 2002 Shri Girdharlal Mohanlal Gangani .... Petitioner Vs. Mrs. Juliet Coutinho and others .... Respondents Shri E.P. Lobo for the Petitioner. Ms W. Coutinho for the Respondent No.l. Shri S.S. Kantak, Advocate General, with Ms R. Chodankar, AGA, for the Respondent No.4. Shri C.A. Ferreira, Asst. Solicitor General, for the Respondent No.5. CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & N.A. BRITTO, JJ. DATED: FEBRUARY 20, 2006 P.C: Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner. Perused the application. Considering the facts disclosed and the difficulties faced in serving notice on the respondent No.2, the application is allowed in terms of the prayer clause 9(a). However, in addition to affixation of service, the petitioner will have to also publish the notice regarding the hearing in two newspapers, one in English and one in Vernacular. The notice shall be returnable in the week commencing from 24-4-2006. Application stands disposed of. (N.A. Britto, J.) (R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/220mca102.6