IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.9747 of 2008 Between: Sri Ram Hanuman Mutt, rep.by its Mahant Rambharose Das, S/o.Late Mahant Moti Das, R/o.Sri Ram Hanuman Mutt, Goodsheds Roas, Near Nampally, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Principal Secretary, Revenue (Endowments) Department, Secretariat Hyderabad 2 The Regional Joint Commissioner, Endowment Department, Tilak Road, Hyderabad 3 The Assistant Commissioner, Endowment Department, Tilak Road,Hyderabad 4 Pilli Guru Murthy S/o.Late Narsimhulu R/o.Flat No.108, Rohini Chambers, Tilak Nagar, Hyderabad 5 Sri Hanuman Bhajan Mandali, rep.by its Secretary, Nampally, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to declare the inaction on the part of the 1st respondent in not passing orders either on the stay petition or on the revision petition filed by the petitioner under section 93 of the AP Charitable and Hindu Religious Institution and Endowments Act 1987 while questioning the proceedings RP.No.1056/2004 dated 19.3.2008 passed by the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, and unjust by issuing appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.V.S.SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.9747 OF 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 17th February, 2009. IBL