IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.481 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 5.2.2010 Smt.Usha Devi ..Appellant. Vs. Shashi Bhushan and others ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present : Mr.Mukesh Yadav, Advocate for the appellant. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. The appellant has challenged order dated 6.11.2009 passed by Civil Judge (Sr.Divn.) Yamunanagar at Jagadhari passed on an application filed under Section 372 of Indian Succession Act. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that this Court has already held in the case of Jitender Kaur and others Versus Jaskirant Kaur and others FAO No.2524 of 2007 decided on 25.2.2009 reported in 2009 Vol.III RCR (Civil) 98 that if the case under Section 372 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short `the Act') has been decided by Civil Judge (Sr.Divn.) exercising the powers of District Judge, then appeal would lie to the District Judge under Section 388(1)(2) of the Act. Hence, counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to file in accordance with law. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 5.2.2010 JUDGE Meenu