IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2010 / 13TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 17146 of 2010(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ANIL KUMAR.C, KUZHIYAM VILA PUTHEN VEEDU, KUZHIYAM VILA, PAYATTUVILA PO. BY ADV. SRI.D.SOMASUNDARAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. GENERAL MANAGER DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DEPUTY REGISTRAR,OFFICE OF THE GENERAL MANAGER, DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY SENIOR GP K C SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO.17146 OF 2010 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 3rd DAY OF JUNE, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner has applied for selection and appointment to the post of Clerk in the District Co-operative Bank, Thiruvananthapuram pursuant to a notification issued by the Public Service Commission (PSC), in the quota earmarked for the employees of the affiliated primary societies. He was short listed for selection by the PSC and he was required to produce an Experience Certificate issued by the Registrar. He has filed this writ petition complaining that the Deputy Registrar has not issued such an Experience Certificate. Therefore, the petitioner seeks appropriate directions for the issue of such a Certificate. 2. Adv.Alexander Thomas, who appears for the third respondent points out that the petitioner has left the service of the Primary Society and is now working in some other society, as is evident from Ext.P2. Inasmuch as the petitioner is no longer in the service of the Primary Society, he is ineligible to claim appointment in the quota earmarked Wpc 17146/2010 2 for the employees of the affiliated Primary Society. It is therefore submitted that in any event, the petitioner is not entitled to an appointment. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was an employee of the Primary Society at the time of submitting the application as well as on the date of appearing for the interview. However, it is to be noticed that the appointment is sought by the petitioner in the quota that is earmarked is for the employees of affiliated Primary Societies. Having left the service of the Primary Society on 2.7.2008, the petitioner is not a person who is an employee of the said Society. Since in any event, the petitioner is ineligible for appointment in the quota that is referred to above, the petitioner is not entitled to any of the reliefs claimed in this writ petition. In the above circumstances, this writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE lgk