1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6268 OF 2009 Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Sangh Maryadit. ....Petitioner vs 1. The Regional Provident Fund Commisioner-I & anr. ....Respondents Mr. P.K. Joshi for the Petitioner. Mrs. S.V. Bharucha for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 05TH MARCH, 2010. P.C. :- 1. The Writ Petition is premature. The impugned order merely contains certain general observations to the effect that the enquiry under Section 14B is not a quasi-judicial enquiry and that the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and Evidence Act are applicable. The impugned order does not indicate as to how the enquiry is proposed to be conducted. That, presumably, will depend on the facts of the case. If the Petitioner is aggrieved by the order that may be passed in any 2 respect, including as to the decision making process, the Petitioner can always challenge the same from the final order that may be passed. It is clarified that the Petitioner will be entitled to challenge the order on any grounds, including on the grounds that his application dated 19th November, 2008 (Page 93 of the Writ Petition) or any part thereof was not allowed. 2. With the above clarification, the Writ Petition is disposed of.