IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8348 of 2008 AMAR NATH KUNWAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 7.7.2008. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 302, 201,120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. There are four complaint petitions lodged in this case. The petitioner has lodged the first complaint petition which is complaint case no. 1085 of 2000 and thereafter different persons have lodged subsequent complaint petitions. The deceased Kishmato Devi had certain lands for which she had executed a sale deed on 18.7.2000. It is alleged that Kishmato Devi was living with the petitioner and since she had not executed the sale deed to the petitioner, he may be responsible for the alleged occurrence. Consistent case of the prosecution is that the lady was taken by Shitaran Prasad on a Jeep for execution of the sale deed in the registry office on 18.7.2000 and thereafter, she could not be traced and the dead body of the lady was recovered after12-15 days. All the witnesses and in fact all the complainants suspect each other of being responsible for the said occurrence. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that apart from suspicion, there is no direct evidence or circumstantial evidence to connect the petitioner with the said occurrence. Be that as it may, the petitioner Amar Nath Kunwar is - 2 - directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the J.M., Siwan in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 92 of 2000 giving rise to Sessions Trial No. 2885 of 2008. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)