l''r3^—— S.B. (ServiceMatfer) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHAmSGARHV WRIT PETITION (S) N0.<30^0 /2011. PETITIONER: SintRaniula Patel, wife of Shri Chandnlal Patel, aged about 42 years, workingas Head Mastier, Govt. Naveen Primary School, Kodatarai, t>ussour, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. Respohdents versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan,Raipur, Chhattisgarh ^V^Z ..^S^A ^^^ y^^N?-/ ^'7^w^>:: ' './•"'c^'''^'' . ^•""J^'.--"' ^y^ <s<r.^ './'^a"^\ ^^~<^ i^S< 1 S ^TS ^ 1. 3. 2. District Education OfBcer, District Raigarh, CUhatdsgarh. 3. Block E>lucation OfGcer, Pussour, Distaiet Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 4. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raigarh, District Raigarh, C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 QFLTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As inentioned in the Cause title. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: As mentioned in the Cause titie. PARTICULARS OP THE CAUSE/ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETITION IS MADE/ SUBJECT MATTER IN BfQEF: .f' ! ht;>13. ®:ii®;f'i;fi:B',;r^K:<,.:: ISflSio^'V/.-Sif'SS^STSK-v.-j^.t•a3f- ^ XI-HC—78 sn^si ^i Vw* wn an^i gfflw '3'ST '<<l'41d^, oilt'M'is, fs«ni^1< ..U.t.^...^6S.f.//..l. aiic;!;il<sl* (^3^?) ^<iw ^rfsff sn^i fSB : Hon'bleShri Maniadr 24.6.2011 Shri C.J.K. Rao, coiinst SIiri N. Naha Roy, Pa^ copy. Leamed counsel for petitioner has passed D. Ed\ therefore the petitioner is she has completed the D.E(j submits tliat the issue involl the decision tn fhe case oj Municipal Corporatlon, C.G.96) & Gopesh Kumar| Chhattisgarh and anothei submits fhat fhis aspect hej Court in the case of State Badrlnarayan Acharya etc.e] leamed coi.msel for the petitic In view of fhe submissl fhe petitioner, it is directed claim of fhe petitioner in tl judgment, which have been qn<<Ift41-< •OMfif ^t fst6 <.h*^K ^siRnsn^r Mohan Shrivastava. J,J 1 for the petitioner. il Lawyer for the State, on advance the petitioner submits that the Examination in the year 2004 and enjtitled to two advance increments, as (. tramlng at her own expenses. He red in fhe writ petition is covered by Yasfawant Kumar Bbaradwaj Vs. D|urg & another [2006 (II) MP.JR Verma Vs. the State Govt. of [W.P. (S) No.4130/05). He also js been considered by fhe Supreme >f Madhya Pradesh & aaother Vs. :{:c (AIR 1996 SC 2779). Accordtng to ^ner fhe petitioner's case is ideritical. 'Spns so made by leamed counsel for piat respondents shaU consider the |e light of her submission and the r^fereed to and if it is found that ftle ,i?'':-.~s.il' ,.,•'"ii'r "i S'i^^ )r Srf' -.»-<''J1 'Taf'/!Xl-HC—JS ^ST •<ii<)i<n'4, si-iil-M'is, fsjdl'l-iyi *<iHf(r aiNieh 3TI^?I 'T^T ('yf^il'^ET) sn^T^iT R-I1+ wffsn^rwqw Praveen (WWdfel 311^1 -L^ petitloner is also identicaUy extended to the petltioner. With the aforesaid disposed of. otjservations, the petition is tmally Sd-/ ManmdraMohanShrivastava y^ Judge ^^f^iN 'RF^ft' ^f "fe^ i^'^r< ^siRnsn^r situated, fhe benefit shall also be