IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41171 of 2009 DEO KUMAR RAM @ DEO KUMAR JAIDEVA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 27.11.2009 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No. 68/2009 for the offences punishable under Sections 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Substance of allegation against the petitioner is of eloping with the daughter of the younger brother of his brother-in-law who is said to be a minor. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner denies the allegation and submits that the victim girl is an adult and that she had gone with him on her own volition. Learned counsel in support of his submission places Annexure-4 which is a statement made under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. of the victim girl, Jyoti Kumari and in which she has stated that she had not been abducted and that she had gone on her own volition and that she had got married to this petitioner. 2 The victim girl had herself claiming to be aged about 18 years. In the said circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been wrongfully roped in the present case. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, Deo Kumar Ram @ Deokumar Jaideva, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur in connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No. 68/2009. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J. )