IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1223 of 2008 BIPIN SHARMA S/O NAGRIK SHARMA R/O VILL- MATIHANI, P.S. MATIHANI, DIST. BEGUSARAI. --- PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAJEEV SHARMA S/O RAM DARESH SHARMA 3. RAM DARESH SHARMA, S/O FAGU SHARMA 4. KARI SHARMA, S/O RAM DARESH SHARMA (OPPOSITE PARTY NO.2 TO 4 ARE R/O VILL MATIHANI P.O.& P.S. MATIHANI DIST. BEGUSARAI. --- OPP. PARTIES. For the Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, Advocate. ----------- 02 30.06.2010 Heard both sides. Learned counsel for the petitioner seems to be not ready with the brief. On query as to when order taking cognizance was passed by the learned Court below, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is not aware. Petitioner, who is complainant, is aggrieved by the order dated 12.08.2008, whereby application filed on his behalf under Section 216 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been considered and disposed of. On perusal of the order dated 12.08.2008, this Court finds no infirmity in the order meriting interference. There is no merit in this application. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)