IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 10453 of 2010 Date of decision:29.7.2010 Gurjinder Singh Petitioner vs. State of Punjab Respondent Present: Mr. Arvind Thakur, Advocate. Mr. PS Bajwa, DAG, Pb M.M.S.BEDI,J. A perusal of the file indicates that the only evidence against the petitioner is that Mandhir Singh had made a statement to the effect that the petitioner had approached said Mandhir Singh on 7.5.2009 and made a disclosure statement that Kewal Singh had been murdered by the petitioner on 21.4.2009. The application for bail, filed by the petitioner, has been dismissed by the learned Sessions Judge, SBS Nagar on the ground that Mandhir Singh is yet to be examined. It is contended by the counsel for the petitioner that Mandhir Singh is being summoned but he has not till date been examined. It has also been argued that in report u/s 173(2) Cr.P.C., copy of which was supplied to the petitioner, name of PW Mandhir Singh was never mentioned. This petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial court to record the statement of Mandhir Singh within a period of two months from today or from the date of two months after the receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that in case within a period of two months, granted to the prosecution agency, the said Mandhir Singh is not examined, it will be open to the trial court to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner. July 29 ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE