® -< .-" ^ ;„...... L.-.. ,—f ^O' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ( S ) N0. I 4-\ ^ / 2009 PETITIONER: VIJAY SINGH RAJPUT, Aged about 37 years, S/o Shri Saryu Singh Rajput, R/o Near Sarda Temple, Tahsil Janjgir, ( District Janjgir-Champa (CG) L Versus RESPONDENTS: 1. ..-•^ Y-. ^r ^^ ?s^' ^y'y^ STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, Through : . The Secretary, Department of Fisheries, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 2. DIRECTOR,l Directorate ofFisheries, Raipur (CG) 3. Dy. Director, Department of Fisheries, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Assistant Director, L Department of Fisheries, / District Janjgir-Champa (CG). WRIT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. li .1 <^f L /l/ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.1414 OF 2009 PETITIONER Vijay Singh Rajput Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & others (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Amrito Das, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyerforthe State. QRDER(ORAL1 (Passed on this 7th day of March, 2011) 1. At the very outset, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State submits that if a representation is made by the petitioner in view of the fact that he was initially appointed and in view of the subsequent change of policy the petitioner has been removed from the service, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits, as early as possible preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 2. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall make a representation within a period of one week. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. _.__ Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge