IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24546 of 2011 1. Vinod Kumar, Son of late Tilakdhari Mahton. 2. Usha Devi, wife of Vinod Kumar. 3. Anuradha Kumari, D/o Vinod Kumar. All resident of village-Barhi Pahari, P.S.-Laheri, District-Nalanda. ………..Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar. ……..Opp. Party. For the petitioners: Mr. Gauri Shankar Prasad, Adv. For the State: Gulnar Begum (APP) ----------- 2. 25.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. The petitioners have come against the order taking cognizance of the offence and summoning them to appear before the court in connection with a case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 341, 323, 506, 504, 380 and 34 of the IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that from the materials collected in course of inquiry, no offence under the aforesaid sections is made out. I have seen the complaint. I find there are sufficient materials in compliant itself and there is no illegality in the order passed by the learned Magistrate while taking cognizance of the offence and summoning them to appear before the court. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Sanjeet/ (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)