HIGH COURT or CHHATTxsaARH, BILASPUR mung) No. 5926 or 2006 (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Apyearance: Shri Deepak Jain, counsel for the petitioner. Shn' Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer, for the State on advance copv {24;082007) sum, KUMAR SINHA, J. ORAL ORDER Heard on admission. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has passed D.Ed. examination on his own expenses, therefore, he is entitled to receive two advance increments according to circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. H'e also submits that in many identical matters, the petitions have been allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwai Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}. He submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the said Judgment. This legal position is not disputed by the learned counsel for the State. However, he submits that the order may be passed in terms of the said judgment, but it shall be subjected to verification regarding petitioneris such qualitication. PETITIONER Ashok Kumar Verma son of Shri Shobharam Velma, aged about 41 years, Assistant Teacher, Middle School, Raja Nawagaon, Block-Bodla, Distm'ct Kabirdham (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1 State ofChhattisgarh, Through— The ‘ Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 2 District v Education Officer, Kabirdham (C. G.) 3 Block Education Otiiccr, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 2 W.P.[S] No. 6926 of2006 Accordingly, this Writ petition is allowed in terms of the ordor passed in case of Yashwant Kumar Bhafadwaj Vs. Municipal Comoration Durg and another (Supra) subject to verification of the facts as to Whether the petitioner had acquired D.Ed. Examination Certidcate on his own expenses as per circulars dated 24. 12. 1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. The petition stands nnally disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge f I