IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4783 of 2010 DAMODAR PRASAD, Son of Bagar Raut, resident of village Mahana Kuli, P.S. Chanpatia, District West Champaran …. Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ….. Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Lallan Kumar Verma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, A.P.P. ------ 2 03.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 489(A, 489(B), 489(C) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been named in the first information report on the basis of a disclosure by a co-accued Ragho Prasad, who was allegedly apprehended along with 25 pieces of currency notes of Rs. 500/- denomination, which are said to be counterfeit. Learned counsel submitted that apart from that there is nothing to connect the petitioner with the case. However, it is also contended that the aforesaid co- accused Ragho Prasad had already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide Annexure 2. 2 In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, DAMODAR PRASAD, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah in connection with Chanpattia P.S. Case No. 52 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the petitioner. If, after his release in this case, the petitioner is again found implicated in similar case, then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)