IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17149 of 2011 1. Indradeo Yadav. 2. Shivnandan Yadav @ Shiv Nandan Kumar @ Pappu. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 24.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, complainant and the State. Petitioner no. 1 being father of the husband and petitioner no. 2 being the husband are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the complainant that both sides are ready for re-conciliation. Let the petitioner no. 2 and the complainant appear before the learned court below on 27th of July, 2011, when the petitioner no. 2 will take the complainant to her matrimonial house and keep her as wife with full dignity and honour. Considering the aforesaid stand of the parties, let the petitioner no. 1, namely, Indradeo Yadav, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of 2 the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Complaint Case No. 491 of 2010, Tr. No. 1754 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. So far as the petitioner no. 2, Shivnandan Yadav @ Shiv Nandan Kumar @ Pappu, is concerned, he permitted to be be released on provisional bail for six months on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Complaint Case No. 491 of 2010, Tr. No. 1754 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The bail bond of the petitioner no. 2 will be confirmed by the learned court below on substantial restoration of the matrimonial harmony within a period of six months, or if the complainant deliberately refuses to reside with the petitioner no. 2. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)