1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR JUDGEMENT D.B. Civil Review Petition No.116/07 Poonam Chand Bhandari vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 2nd September, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. NARAYAN ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Poonam Chand Bhandari-petitioner present in person Heard Mr. Poonam Chand Bhandari, who appears in person. This application has been filed to review the order dated 18.07.07 passed by the bench of this Court in D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.8421/06. The writ application was in the form of PIL. The grievance of the writ petitioner in the PIL was that persons, while remaining in government service, also passed LL.B Course from Rajasthan University, therefore, a prayer was made to issue direction to the authorities to enquire into the matter and take appropriate action against such persons who obtained LL.B. Degree. The Bench of this Court however disposed of the PIL application on the premise of a decision rendered by this Court in the case of Padam Pandit vs. Rajasthan University, Jaipur & Anr.-D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.559/07 decided on 29.5.07. The bench of this Court, however, observed that LL.B course not being casual or part time, candidates who were working under the government, could not have been allowed to complete the course, and in view of the direction in Padam Pandit, the writ application was disposed of. 2 Mr.P.C. Bhandari, the petitioner however submits that in the light of prayer made in the writ application, the bench of this Court could have passed necessary orders at the face of the pleadings of the petitioner. In sum and substance, Mr. Bhandari submits that appropriate action should be taken against those persons who obtained LL.B degree while also functioning in the government offices. The scope of review is limited and the Court has to see as to the errors apparent on the face of the record. For the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner to take action against the defaulting government employees, who had obtained LL.B degree, in our view, cannot be a ground for review / recall. At the same time, it appears that the bench of this Court had taken sufficient care of the decision rendered in the case of Padam Pandit and observed that the observations made by this Court in paragraph 12 of the judgement in the case of Padam Pandit would be applicable to the full time employees of the State Government who seek to pursue the LL.B Course. It was further observed that in the light of the judgement, the University of Rajasthan as well as the State Government shall act accordingly. For the reasons aforementioned, therefore, we do not find any merit in this review application as no error apparent is pointed out. This review application is accordingly dismissed. (Mohammad Rafiq),J. (Narayan Roy), C.J. ravi/-