IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 9TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 18TH BHADRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 5393 of 2010() ----------------------------- (CRIME NO.216/2010 OF VENMONY POLICE STATION) AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN BA.5016/2010 Dated 30/08/2010 CMP.5139/2010 of J.M.F.C.-I, CHENGANNUR .................... PETITIONER: 3RD ACCUSED ------------------------------- PRAKASH, S/O.NARAYANAN, PRATHEESH BHAVAN, ASARIVILAYIL BHAGOM, MUDIYOORKONAM MURI, PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.B.RENJITHKUMAR RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HIRTHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.RAMKUMAR, J. ---------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.5393 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 9th day of September, 2010 ORDER The petitioner, who is the third accused in Crime No.216/2010 of Venmony Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 457 & 380 read with Section 34 I.P.C., seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 22/7/2010. The petitioner was arrested on 27/7/2010. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending inter alia that the petitioner is involved in yet another theft case. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, Bail Appln.No.5393/2010 : 2 : therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj