IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15356 of 2005 SITARAM SINGH KUSHWAHA SONOF LATE RAM DAWAR SINGH KUSHWAHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JIGINI (DAMODARPUR), P.S. BHABHUA DISTRICT KAIMUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. D.G. CUM I.G. OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. A.I.G. (WELFARE), BIHR, PATNA. 4. A.I.G. (PERSONNEL), BIHAR, PATNA. 5. D.I.G. (HUMAN RIGHTS), BIHAR, PATNA. 6. S. P. KAIMUR AT BHABUA 7. D.I.G. HOMEGUARD, BIHAR PATNA. 8. COMMANDANT HOME GUARD, BIHAR, PATNA. ----------- 2 20/09/2010 This is the second visit of the petitioner. His earlier writ application being C.W.J.C. No. 6858 of 2003 was disposed of with a direction upon the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner on the question of granting certain benefits to him. A reasoned order has now been passed contained in annexure-8. The order states that there are no rules based on which the petitioner can demand appointment as a constable or the benefits merely because he received injury during the course of so called performance of the duty because the petitioner is or was a Homeguard and not holder of a civil post as such under the respondent State. In absence - 2 - of any serious legal challenge to the reasons given in annexure-8, no interference is warranted with the impugned order dated 25.02.2004. So far as the discrimination which is being pleaded now by the petitioner in terms of his statement made in paragraph 13 is concerned, a bald statement like that does not make out a case of discrimination under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. This writ application is dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)