In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh C.W.P. No. 9951 of 2005 Date of Decision: 31.8.2006 Ajmer Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI PRESENT: None for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana, for the respondents. JUDGMENT M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral) The petitioner has challenged the orders dated 15.5.2004 (P-5) and 21.6.2005 (P-7). By the first order the services of the petitioner has been retrenched and by the second order the District Forest Officer, Morni-Pinjore Forest Division, Pinjore, has tried to correct his error by calculating the retrenchment compensation of Rs. 3,927/-. We are of the view that the proper remedy for the petitioner would be to seek a reference to the Labour Court by raising an industrial dispute. The aforementioned orders could more properly be challenged before the Labour Court by seeking a reference, as has been held by a Full Bench of this Court in the case of Manohar Lal v. State of Punjab, 1983 PLR 666. In view of above, we dispose of the instant petition relegating the petitioner to approach the Labour Court. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (M.M.S. BEDI) August 31, 2006 JUDGE Pkapoor