Crl.M.No.M-11035 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-11035 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 21, 2010 Bikar Singh and others .....Petitioners v. State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Ashu Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of FIR No.136, dated 23.8.2003, under Sections 498-A, 406 and 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Sidwan Bet, Police District Jagraon. Heard. A perusal of file shows that earlier also Crl.M.No.M-40583 of 2003 was filed by present petitioners for quashing of this FIR and a coordinate Bench of this Court passed the following order on 17.10.2008: “Learned counsel for respondent no.2 has taken instructions from his client in the context of order dated 13.8.2008. Learned counsel states that the respondent- complainant would not oppose quashing of FIR in case the share of property of Charanjit Singh is transferred in the name of his children. Learned counsel for the petitioners, under the circumstances, prays for an adjournment to enable the petitioners to transfer the share of property of Charanjit Singh in the name of his children. Adjourned to 21.01.2009. The needful be done before the next date of hearing.” Subsequently another coordinate Bench of this Court passed Crl.M.No.M-11035 of 2010 (O&M) -2- the following order on 21.1.2009: “Counsel for the petitioner states that as per instructions given to him, property shall be transferred by the petitioners in the name of Charanjit Singh's children, to give effect to the orders dated 13.8.2008 and 17.8.2008 passed by this Court. Counsel for the petitioners and respondent No.1- State submit that it has been held by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab 2007(3) Recent Criminal Reports 1052 that compromise not only promotes peace in the society but also saves parties from litigation. The present petition is disposed of with the direction that in case within two months from today the property, in terms of the orders dated 13.8.2008 and 17.8.2008 passed by this Court, is transferred by the petitioner in the name of Charanjit Singh's children, the trial Court shall drop the proceedings in view of compromise arrived between parties, otherwise the Court shall proceed with the trial, in accordance with law.” Petitioners have failed to show this Court whether the said order has been complied with by them. The said order has become final as the same has not been challenged. Be that as it may, in view of order dated 21.1.2009, passed by this Court in Crl.M.No.M-40583 of 2003, the present petition for quashing on the same facts is not maintainable. Hence, the same is dismissed. 21.4.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge