THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23689 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners claim to have made representations, dated 09.09.2009 and 16.10.2009, to respondent Nos.1 and 2, alleging that their immediate neighbour, respondent No.3 herein, is making construction in violation of the building byelaws and statutory provisions and complain that no action has been taken thereon. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are under obligation to ensure that no construction is made without the sanctioned plan or in deviation thereof. When the petitioners have brought to their notice that respondent No.3 is undertaking construction contrary to the building byelaws, a spot inspection ought to have conducted and necessary steps ought to have taken. There cannot be any justification for respondent Nos.1 and 2 in not taking any steps on the representations made by the petitioners. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to cause inspection of the premises in which the construction is being undertaken by respondent No.3. In case any deviations are noticed, necessary steps shall be taken strictly in accordance with law, duly putting respondent No.3 on notice. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:04.11.2009 kdl