IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1625 of 2010 Between: Dasari Ghanasyam & others. ..... Petitioners AND Ganagalla Paparao & another. .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri N.G.K. Nair for Sri A. Ravishanker Counsel for the respondents: Sri M.V. Suresh Kumar The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1625 of 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of order dated 25.02.2010 in E.P.No.1 of 2010 in O.S.No.71 of 2008 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Sompeta, Srikakulam District, whereby the Court below has directed delivery of possession in the E.P. filed by the respondents. I have heard Sri N.G.K. Nair representing Sri A. Ravishanker, learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. The respondents have obtained decree in O.S.No.71 of 2008 inter alia for delivery of plaint schedule property from the possession of the petitioners. The petitioners pleaded that they have filed an application for setting aside the ex parte decree under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and that as there was delay of 45 days in filing such application, they have filed I.A.No.294 of 2009 for condonation of delay. It is their further case that the respondents filed E.P. much after the filing of the abovementioned applications by the petitioners and without disposing of their applications, the Court below has passed the impugned order. At the hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that in pursuance of the impugned order, possession was delivered to the respondents. In view of the above subsequent event, no relief can be granted in this revision petition. However, the learned Senior Civil Judge, Sompeta, is directed to dispose of the petitioners’ applications, referred to above, if not already done, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order without regard to the fact that possession was already delivered in pursuance of the ex parte order. Subject to the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the Civil Revision Petition, CRPMP No.2170 of 2010 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is also dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 04.02.2011 ES