IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.25985 of 2001 Between: Rep. Secretary-S.M.S.R.Mosu. S/o. M.S.R.Mosu, D-12, Industrial Estate, Mulugu Road, Warangal. St.Lousis Educational Soceity, ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner and Director of School Education. Saifabad, Hyderabad. 3 The National Council for Teachers Education (NCTE), Rep. by its Regional Director, Southern REgional Committee, 125, Infantry Road, Bangalore. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to pass orders, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the orders of the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.2322/N2-2/2000, dated 08/11/2001 as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the section 12 and 14 of NAtional Council for Teachers Education (NCTE) Act, and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India, if necessary by declaring para 3 (iv) of G.O.Ms.No.398, Education Department, dated 04/12/1997 and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to issue no objection certiﬁcate and forward the same along with petitioner's Application for permission to start B.Ed. College, and grant such other. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.KASAJAGANMOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.25985 of 2001 ORDER: When the matter has been taken up for hearing on 21-04- 2008, none appeared for the petitioner and, therefore, the matter was directed to be posted after summer vacation. On 29-07- 2008, when the matter has been taken up for hearing, none appeared for the petitioner and as such, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption “for dismissal”. Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, neither learned counsel for the petitioner is present nor is there any representation on its behalf. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 05-08-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{ANURADHA}