IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 15598 of 2007 DATE OF DECISION: February 17, 2009 Const. Jaspal Singh Rana .........PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Union of India and Others ......RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present: Mr. Sandeep Bawa, Advocate, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Garg, Advocate, for respondents. AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondents states that the petitioner was required to file a revision petition before appropriate authority which has not been done and, therefore, this petition is premature. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that there is inherent defect in the impugned orders in so much as the petitioner on the given date was on medical rest. The leave period was regularised by the competent officer in accordance with Rules. In such circumstances, the petitioner could not even have been charged. This petition is disposed of to enable the petitioner to file a revision petition to which issue of limitation shall not be raised. The C.W.P. No. 15598 of 2007 -2- revisional authority would consider the revision petition and take a decision within 90 days of its filing. 17.02.2009 (AJAI LAMBA) shivani JUDGE