IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.1558/2010 Hanuman Sahay and Naina Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor Date of Order ::: 21.05.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Rajesh Goswami, Counsel for petitioners Shri Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor #### By the Court:- Upon hearing learned counsel for petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and perusing the material available on record, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Bail application is accordingly dismissed. When leanred counsel for petitioner cited the anticipatory bail granted by the court below to co-accused Chhote Lal by order dated 28.01.2010 in Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.136/2010, against whom there is direct evidence of demand of dowry in the statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., learned Public Prosecutor submitted that he would take steps to apply for cancellation of his bail. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//