:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1778 OF 2004 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1778 OF 2004 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1778 OF 2004 -------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders -------------------------------------------------------- Shaikh Shabhir- party-in-person. Mrs. P.H. Kantharia, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : V.G. PALSHIKAR & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 01.11.2004 P.C. . By this petition, the petitioner has made the following prayers. "(a) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue appropriate writ order or direction or set aside, directing the Respondents to produce the photographs and books and camera and slate written in Marathi. Whatever on the books written ledger book should be produced before the Hon’ble Court pending the hearing and final of this Writ Bandra Court Case No.749/P/2000 and 469/P/96 to be stayed. :2: (b) Pending the hearing and final disposal of writ petition this Hon’ble Court to be passed and order or directions to the Magistrate Court, Bandra, in case No.749/p/2000 and 469/p/96 to be transferred in the High Court at Bombay in their Writ petition for hearing. (c) Pending the hearing and final disposal of the writ this Hon’ble Court to be passed an order i.njunction restraining their officers, servants and agents Respondents to be stayed for taking any action in this matter against the petitioner. (d) Interim and ad-interim relief in terms of prayer A & C be granted. (e) Interim and Ad-interim relief in terms of prayer ’A’. (f) Interim Ad Ad-interim relief in term of prayer ’C’" The respondents were asked to file reply. Reply has been filed on affidavit, wherein it is stated that the photographs of the petitioner are required only for the purpose of identification in cases pending investigation or trial before the police. The petitioner is at liberty to give :3: such photographs, if he has any objection he is at liberty to refuse the same. In such situation we see no interference is in this regard. Petition is dismissed. [ V.G. PALSHIKAR, J.] (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]