IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SUNDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 9206 of 2004 Between: 1 M. China Raghava Reddy, S/o. China Anki Reddy R/o. Chinnagangam (V), Chinnaganjam (M), Prakasam District. 2 R. Masthan Reddy, S/o. Peda Raghava Reddy R/o. Chinnagangam (V), Chinnaganjam (M), Prakasam District. 3 S. Subbarami Reddy, S/o. Venkatappa, R/o. Chinnagangam (V), Chinnaganjam (M), Prakasam District. 4 S. Nagendra Reddy, S/o. Venkatappa, R/o. Chinnagangam (V), Chinnaganjam (M), Prakasam District. 5 M. Rosamma, W/o. Sriramulu Reddy, R/o. Chinnagangam (V), Chinnaganjam (M), Prakasam District. 6 S. Krishna Reddy, S/o. Venkateswarlu Reddy, R/o. Chinnagangam (V), Chinnaganjam (M), Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Joint Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Chinnaganjam (M), Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for records relating to file in D. Dis NO.5536/03(D2) from the file of 1st respondent, examine the same and declare the order Dt. 25.1.2004 is illegal, irregular, without jurisdiction violative of principles of natural justice and also unconstitutional, being violative of Art. 14 19 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the provisions of A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act and rules framed there under and also hit by A.P. Board Standing Orders and consequently direct the respondents to restore the pattadar passbooks and title deeds and not to dispossess the petitioners from the possession of their respective land. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : O R D E R:- This writ petition is filed for a writ of certiorari to quash the order, dated 25.1.2004 passed by the 1st respondent-Joint Collector, Prakasam District. The petitioners filed this writ petition aggrieved by the action of the 1st respondent whereby he cancelled the pattadar passbooks and title deeds granted in the favour of the petitioners on the ground that the assignments made in their favour in the year 1975 were subsequently cancelled. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue placed before me a Fax Message, dated 9.7.2008 sent by the Tahsildar, Chinnaganjan, Prakasam District wherein it is stated that in pursuance of the order dated 27.12.1979 passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ongole, the Tahsildar conducted a denovo enquiry and issued proceedings dated 11.4.2006 confirming the order of assignment made in favour of the petitioners by the Tahasildar, Chirala in the year 1975. He also enclosed the copies of those proceedings of the fax message. He stated that though messages were sent to the petitioners, they have not applied to Tahasildar for issuance of pattadar passbooks and title deeds in pursuance of the said order and as and when the petitioners apply for issuance of pattadar passbooks and title deeds the same will be issued following due procedure. In view of the above stand taken by the Tahasildar, the cause in this writ petition does not survive for consideration and the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to the disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.11828 of 2004 and W.V.M.P.No.1737 of 2008 are also disposed of as infructuous. No costs. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J. 9th July, 2008 bcj