1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. APPLICATION NO. 3477 OF 2004 CRI. APPLICATION NO. 3477 OF 2004 CRI. APPLICATION NO. 3477 OF 2004 Shri Suresh Hari Pawar & Ors. .. Applicants. V/s. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondents. ----- Mr. D.V. Kedar i/by G.V. Bhagar for Applicants. Mr. S.R. Shinde, APP for Respondent -State. ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 30.09.2004 DATED : 30.09.2004 DATED : 30.09.2004 PC :- PC :- PC :- . Heard the learned counsel for the applicants/ petitioners for quite some time. Having regard to the serious allegations made against the concerned Judge, the counsel was told that the Advocate who had appeared before the trial court, should stand by the allegations made in the Petition by his affidavit. The counsel was also told that if, ultimately after enquiry, it is found that the allegations were unwarranted or reckless, then the matter will be taken to its logical end, including by initiating appropriate action against the affiants, who have asserted the case stated in the present application. In response to this, the counsel appearing for the 2 petitioners submits that the petitioners would better withdraw all the allegations and insinuations in the application against the concerned Judge and in particular contained in paragraphs 9 and 10 of the application. In that case there is no reason to interfere. Hence disposed of. . Order accordingly. .....