Petg‘tmner Respomients 1) k) v 3) HIGH CGURT 9?: €HH§Tf§SG£RH: $§L¢KSFUR RJ. Katkam, aoee‘ abaui 83 ‘years‘ sun of Amanda Singh Katiam, retired Devemsment Extension O§Ecen Jarspad Panchay‘at, Gundei‘dehi, Distiict Burg (CG) Rio Vi§iaae and P‘O‘ Bhaihagaon (R) BEec-k GunderdehE, Disific-t Burg {Ct-G), $¥esent: Versus £xccountant Generai of CG. through ihe Senior Accounts Offécer {Lekha avam Haqdari) Dwitiya, Nidhi Nag, Ra‘pur {CG}. State of Chhat€isgarh Panchayai & Rurai Deveiogment Rapurf ‘m Dept, Pu’lantraiaya1 DKS. Ehawan; The Acidi. Assi Commissianer, Janpad Panchayat. Doundi; District (Writ Peiiiion under Amde 2267227 of the Cormitutmn of india) $3: Heiféyae win $atis§a K. AgMhoW, d‘ caun ei for t'n ooner 3’"; Sunita Jam, Panel Lawer tome State‘ Shri Ajay Baraik, Advocaie appears on behaif of Shri SK Beowai, Siano‘ino Counse‘ for Umon of india. Shri RK. Kes‘narwa 0mg. GREER {Fas$ed on 3Qm'day of Aym, mag; With consent of ieameo’ counsei appearing for the oaniesl the matter is heard fmaiiy. This case pertains to ggievance of non—gmnt of reiirai dues. This Court, in the rna’rier of VV.P.No.4642I2004 (Baiinath Mendai Vs‘ The \ State of Chhatfisgarh & others) and oiher connected maiere, direcieo‘ :he Committee to consider the matter of rerria! dues as rhe dreamed Question of racis were invoiveo'. The Commitree was cone‘ti‘ru'red by the Stare Government, pursuant to the order dared woo-20% gassed in WP.No.1961/2UOE {Smt Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. Siare Government of Chnamsoarn and or‘nereL and oreer oareo‘ 13-3-2008 passed in MCC. No. “:65 of 2GG8 (State of Cn‘nart‘rsoari‘. and others Writ ?etition Non 5933 o§ 2905 ems 3??) Vs. Baijnath Manda} ana‘ another). Thus, this peiiiion is squareh; covered by the }L:dgmen€ and Drder dated 315‘ Januayy, 2068 passed in WPNo. 454212004 (Baiinath Mandai (supra) i as submmed by ieamed counsei appearing for the DameS, 2§ This petition is accordingw disposed of m the same terms 1.6., the omce of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to ‘t’ne Commiitee, wiihin a perkod o? 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of ihis order‘ Thereader, the Committee shatt tssue notice to the petitioner and the otrioets comertted’, within a further period of t5 days The Committee shatt consider and ease order, to accordance With law, after affording oroper opportunity ot heartr‘sg to the petitioner The petitioner and the officers concerned may fiie additionat documents, if necessary The entire exercise, inciuding payment of retirai dues, tf any, to the petitioner) be compieted within a period of tour months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3) The petitioner shaii suppi'y one compiete set of the petitiot to the State counsel as weii as to the counsel for Union of india for onward transmission to the Committee. Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge