IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41296 of 2009 SITTO MANDAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.11.2009 Heard. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. which contains direct allegation only against the husband of the deceased of murdering her with the help of his accomplices. The attention of the Court was drawn to the submission made in the court below by the petitioner that the witnesses examined in paragraphs 62,63, 64 and 65 have stated that the petitioner had contributed in disposal of the dead body. The learned Sessions Judge has not rejected the contention and has simply noted that the statements showed the complicity of the petitioner in the commission of the offence. The contention is that there is no allegation of killing the deceased against the petitioner and he is simply alleged to have helped the accused in disposal of the dead body. Considering the above facts, let the 2 petitioner Sitto Mandal be directed to be released from custody on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in Sanokhar P.S.Case No. 15 of 2009. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)