IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 5111 of 2011(L) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ SMT.T.N.DEEPA, KATTIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KUPPADY VILLAGE, NOOLPUZHA, WAYANAD. BY ADVS. SRI.S.EASWARAN SRI.P.MURALEEDHARAN (IRIMPANAM) SRI.M.A.AUGUSTINE RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, KERALA HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695001. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 5111 of 2011-L - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 25th day of February, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner is working a Upper Primary School Assistant in Government High School, Kallur, Sulthan Bathery. The petitioner is having post graduate degree in Physics with B.Ed. 2. The petitioner submitted an application for appointment as HSST. The dispute that is raised herein is with regard to the deletion of the name of the petitioner from Exts.P2 and P3 seniority lists. According to the petitioner in Ext.P1 list her name was included, but that was deleted in the revised list published as per Exts.P2 and P3. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Ext.P4 representation in the matter. 3. Learned Govt. Pleader on instructions, submitted that the petitioner is not having the qualification in SET and therefore her name was deleted. But according to the petitioner, since she is having more than 10 years service as H.S.A., that is not required also. 4. Since the grievance is with regard to the seniority list, the petitioner will have to challenge it before the Government. If the petitioner files an appropriate representation before the Government along with a copy wpc 5111/2011 2 of this judgment within one month from today, the same will be entertained and appropriate decision will be taken after hearing the petitioner, within a further period of two months. The writ petition is disposed of as above. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/