./" c^ IN THE mGH COURT OF CHHATHSCSARH AT BILASFUR (CHHATtlSGAKHl WRITPETITION N0. '2> ^l^ /2003 ^ PETITIONER \^^ o^*?^-'*' .. y f3'.-:'L •''' e%^-""< RESPONDENTS Rom Nath Sahu, son of Pati Ram Sahu, Posted as Accountant, Office of the Block Educatiori OfBcer, Gunderdehi, TehsU Gunderdehi, Dist. Durg (C.G.) Presently residing at C/o Sheikh Sharif Near Mosque, Gunderdehi, Tehsil Gunderdehi, Dist., Durg (C.G.), Permanent address- ViUage Anda, TehsU & Dist. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS y ' • : ' . 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through the secretary, Department of School Edueation, Govt. ofChhattisgarh, D.K. Bhavan, Raipur ( C.G. ) 2. The District Education Officer, Durg(C.G. ) _ 3. The Block Education Officer, Gunderdehi, TehsU Gunderdehi, Distriet Durg( G.G. ) 4. Shri K.R.Hirwani, AcGQuntant, oHice ofthe BloCEkEdufc^tiort Officer Crunderdehi Tehsil Gunderdetiil Districtj Durg ( C.G. ) n^ J WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDI^FOR ISSUANCE OF WMT/WRITS, ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION 1 ^IREGTIQNS^ IN THE NATXJRE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORAM. OR OF ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE NATURE 01) PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As per cause title. 02) PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: As per cause title. [t 03) PARTICITLARS OF ORDERS AfiACTST WHICH THE 3lESENTP^nTIONlSBEINGMADE: --T\^^ ^Sffi;fcit*£^&-h^ij.-ii.j'E..;-^ ''isi^^.ii'i^ XI-HC-22 sn^[^ii ^FTR; 311^1 •anwgfN TSEf 'sipiRfq, ^y'is, wcii'yy ...^ *!INCTI %t||ch aiK^i •^giwc.'Hf^t ide 03.11.2003 Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, coimse\ Shri Ranbir Singh Murhas,j respondents 1 to 3. Heard bolh the counsel. By -this writ petition under India, the petitioner seeks to 24.09.2003, which was fonmrded by| The leamed counsel for the p^ is working as Account in the Office| woa transferred at •(he present pla^e da+ed 23.09.2002 <md he joined on[ period of one year, the petition^ Oistrict; S>urg, and •the tronsfer after issuance of the notification Commission of Indio, which is Commission. The leamed counset fori The petitiorwr's father is aged ab< required to look after him at petitioner may be allowed to make ej to which the learned ©ovt. Ad\ respondents 1 to 3 has no objectiorh fo^ the petitwner. 6ovt. Advocate for the State/ ^iiqfepin ^iFRff 4 felfl tf^R?iT •^aiPgiTsn^r lArticle 226 of -rfie Constitution of ct^altenge Ihe transfer order dated respondent No.2 on 10.10.2003. stitioner submits •that the petitioner [of respondentNo.3. The petitioner of posting (6underdehi) vide order [that post on 10.10.2002. Within a has been tnmsferred to Batod, hcis been issued in the back date |dated 06.10.2003 by the Etectton the directions of ihe Election •the petitioner furthersubmits that (ut 75 years and the peTitioner is In the drcumstances, •the representation to respondent No.l ^ocate oppearing for the S'tate/ orqer agaitist Sundlerdehi. |;J^@il3ia!'I!E@ IB' XI-HC-22 ^^ •^ff'iiOT, 'Ntws, f««iwy r ( ^e- WTOff W*<1<») ^^^^±s^/. •'M/200^ an^i'^ •feTi?; an^l gnwgf^i Soma sTC^'^giWHl^ circumstortces tfa l-lavin9 heard +he learned regard to the facts ond allowed to make a representation from today raisin9 all his grisvonce^ decide The representation wi'thin the r^»resentation, in an objectiv^ considermg all •the grievances of the diall not be relieved from The alreaaly been retieved. With the above observations |disposed of. Con^quently, AA.(W.)P.No. |s1wid di^osed of, Parties are entitled for certifietl c^unsel for the parties and having of the case, the petitioner is respondent No.l within ten cbys and in tum, respondent No.l shall thir^y days from the docte of receipt of manner wi-th a reasoncsd order jpetitioner. Till then.the petitioner pkiffie of posting, if he has not pres^nt l*r4<-l<ii-f tll4?if 4 'fe'zt <FI]^K ^siPgqan^i and directrons -the petition stands .3140/2003 and I.A.No.9964/2003 atso copy of -Hiis order. Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge