IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13506 of 2010 AMARNATH SINGH, Son of Nagendra Singh, R/o village Shahpur Junaid, P.S. Sakra, District Muzaffarpur ….. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …. Opposite Party ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Dr. I.K.Srivastava, A.P.P. ----- 3 12.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier, the prayer for bail of the petitioner had been rejected at that stage vide order dated 26.11.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 41401 of 2009 as contained in Annexure 1 to the application. It is submitted that cognizance has now been taken in this case and other co-accused Md. Mumtaz, from whom possession also certain incriminating articles had been recovered, had already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 31.3.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 2917 of 2010. It has also been submitted that the antecedent of the petitioner is clean and he is in custody - 2 - since 10.8.2009. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, AMARNATH SINGH, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No. 292 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the petitioner. If, after his release in this case, the petitioner is again found implicated in similar nature of cases, then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for - 3 - cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)