Crl.Misc.No.M-27146 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-27146 of 2008. Decided on: February 26, 2010. Jagir Singh and others .. Petitioners VERSUS The State of Punjab and another .. Respondents * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI * * * PRESENT Mr.B.S.Kathuria, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Arshvinder Singh, DAG, Punjab, for the respondent-State. M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioners Nos.1 to 3 are father-in-law, mother-in- law and husband of Kulwinder Kaur, complainant who has alleged that she was married to petitioner No.3, on 09.02.2003. There are allegation that her husband and her in laws maltreated her on account of not meeting the demand of dowry. List of the articles is given in the FIR which was not returned despite demand. Counsel for the petitioners submit that there are vague allegations. It would be appropriate at this stage, in the . . . 1 Crl.Misc.No.M-27146 of 2008 exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to enter into the niceties of the trial and determined whether any offence is made out against the petitioners or not on the basis of alleged vague allegations. The petitioner No.3, is stated to be an army pesonnel. No ground is made out for quashing of FIR. However, in the interest of justice, taking into consideration the age of the petitioner Nos.1 & 2, it is ordered that in case they move an application for exemption from personal appearance, the trial Court will allow the same subject to any conditions imposed upon them. It is made clear that the said concession will not be permitted to be misused by petitioner Nos.1 & 2. With above observations, the petition is dismissed, without prejudice to the rights of the parties during trial. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE February 26, 2010. rka . . . 2