IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 6344 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 6344 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 6344 OF 2007 Proposed Saurabh Tower Co-op. Hsg.Sty.Ltd. .... Petitioner versus Divisional Joint Registrar...... Respondent. Co-op.Societies & ors Shri Milind D. Parad for the petitioners. CORAM; A.P. DESHP ANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHP ANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHP ANDE, J. DATED; 07TH DATED; 07TH DATED; 07TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 SEPTEMBER, 2007 SEPTEMBER, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. A proposal for registration of society was rejected and agsinst the said rejection, the petitioner filed an appeal, and as there was delay of more than two years in filing of the appeal, the application for condonation of delay was filed. The petitioner contended in the application for condonation of delay that the petitioner was never informed about the decision in the matter and the petitioner was not aware about the rejection of his application and on this ground prayed that the delay be condoned. The First Appellate Court on perusal of the record and the rozanama of the Deputy Registrar, has found that the petitioner has signed the rozanama acknowleding the noting of the decision of rejection of the proposal. As the appellate authority found that the plea for condonation of delay was dishonest, has rejected the application. Aggreived thereby the present petition has been filed. 2. As it is revealed that the petitioner has raised a false plea for seeking condonation of delay, then there is no reason to exercise the discretionary jurisdiction in favour of the petitioner. In the result the writ petition is summarily dismissed.