...-li""... .t^-1'"";^ ••"l^.y^s: ..^-•^ ..iA^^ ,x*i 1 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETITION (S) N0. Lj0^^ OF 2011 PETITIONER > Madhukar Parkhi, S/o. Late Shri U.B.Parkhi, Aged about 35 years, Assistant Grade-3, R/o C/o Santosh Nandanwar, Street No.5, Mamta , Nagar, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Secretary, Department of Veterinary Development, Mantaralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipiu-, District - Raipur (C.G.) Du'ector, Veterinary Services, Raipur, Dista-ict- Raipur (C.G.) .3. Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, BUaspiu-, District-BUaspiir;(C.G.) 4. Dr. R. P. Sonwane, Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, BUaspur, Dista-iGt-Bilaspur (C.G.) ^s^m l< :^^>A^ i\ ^••^r \-'\ ^'..s^'yft.-^'' ^^y'y ^ WRFT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA • :':3iiSu: XI-HC—78 *II*IMI a»*ii<*i 3^ -i<NI<'1<1, ®Tl)'M'l6,faldl'M^ ^.......^•£.•... '1.^.^-]^200 311^1 xl?^7 (1c<f'l«l<itf) 311^1 W R'fi* ^w sn^TsE^N? swm ^ifs^i 3ii^i cfcl^^^'1'1 'RTH^ff Tf f^St <fal<"§1< ^aifiiiisn^i <»", '»• jra.<yfi,S-JO&rf&.A¥l£S*U..V O A A^^Cr Shri Chandresh Shrivaste Shri A.V.Shridhar, P.L. fo: Chalienge in the presei 12.7.2011 (Annexure P/l) passe Services, Rajnandgaon whereby suspension. Contention of the counsi there being any basis, on frivok put under suspension. On the other hand, S oetitioner has an altemative Director and as such the presenf At this stage, counsel for petition with Uberty to approach submits that the appellate auth< of the petitioner expeditiously. Accordingly, the petition| eventuality of filing appeal by th| date of receipt of oopy of this decide the same as expeditiousy !t is made clear that this on the merits of the case and 11 Hberty to decide the appeal stric| t?a, oounsel for the petitioner. the State. petition is to the order dated |d by the Deputy Director, Veterinary the petitioner has been put under ^l for the petitioner is that without ^us charges, the petitioner has been tate counsel foints out that the ^emedy of ffling appeal before the petition is premature. [he petitioner wants to wtthdraw this the appellate authority. He however ?rity be directed to decide the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. In the s petitioner within ten days from the order, the appellate authority shall as possible in accordance with law. ^ourt has not expressed any opinion he authority concemed would be at ly in accordance with iaw^ Sd/- ,..„ ^i >*. TSW?aK*=i ^, priti"ker.""'""