1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR : O R D E R : S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4931/2006 (Fakir Mal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of Order :: 13.08.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS None present for the petitioner. Mrs.R.R. Kanwar, Dy. Govt. Counsel. In this case, petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- (i) by an appropriate writ, order or directions, the respondents be directed to grant arrears of salary to the petitioner after fixing his pay in the regular pay scale prevalent at the time for the period from 04.10.2001 to 12.02.2005. (ii) by an appropriate writ, order or directions, the respondents may be directed to pay arrears of salary for the period of suspension from 18.11.1982 to 04.10.2001. 2 (iii) the respondents may kindly be directed to pay interest @ 18% per annum on the arrears of salary from the date the same became due till the date of payment. The petitioner was initially appointed as LDC and thereafter vide order dated 18th November, 1982 he was placed under suspension on the basis of registration of criminal case against him. Vide judgment dated 15th January, 1987 petitioner was convicted for committing offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The petitioner preferred an appeal challenging the said conviction before this High Court. The said appeal was registered as S.B. Criminal Appeal No.22/1987 and the same was allowed by this High Court vide judgment dated 11th November, 2001. The said judgment dated 11th November, 2001 was challenged by the State by way of filing Special Leave to Appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The said appeal was registered as Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No.1032/2002 and the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated 16th November, 2005 set aside the judgment of learned Single Judge of this Court and uphold the judgment rendered by the learned trial court. Meaning thereby, finally the petitioner was convicted 3 by the Ho'nble Supreme Court. In this view of the matter, the claim of petitioner is totally unfounded. No relief as prayed by the petitioner can be granted after the judgment by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the judgment of conviction passed by the trial court. Therefore, writ petition filed by petitioner have no force. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS),J. A.K. Chouhan/-