1 SBCW NO.9374/2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 9374/2008 Pappa Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others ......... Date of Order : 13/03/2009 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. R.S.Choudhary, for the petitioner. Mr. R.L.Jangid, Addl. Advocate General for the respondents. BY THE COURT The only grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner applied for the post of Prabodhak under the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Service, Rules, 2008 (for short 'the Rules of 2008' hereinafter) in pursuance of the advertisement Annex.5. He was called for interview, faced the interview and according to the petitioner he stands tentatively selected, however, in the final select list, his name does not appear. According to the petitioner, he submitted a representation Annex.8 dated 01.10.2008 to the respondent No.3 District Education Officer, Elementary, Jodhpur which has not yet been decided. 2 SBCW NO.9374/2008 In my view, there can be no reason for the respondent to keep the representation filed by the petitioner pending for such a long period and therefore, the respondent No.3, District Education Officer, Elementary, Jodhpur shall consider and decide the representation Anex.8 dated 01.10.2008 filed by the petitioner utmost expeditiously strictly in accordance with law. With these directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp 3 SBCW NO.9374/2008 S.B.Civil Misc. Stay Petition No. 16076/08 In S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 9374/08 Date of Order : 13/03/2009 HON'BLE MR. H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. R.S.Choudhary, for the petitioner. Mr. R.L.Jangid, Addl. Advocate General for the respondents. Since the writ petition itself has been disposed of, the stay petition also stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp