THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.636 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner filed W.P.No.18566 of 2010 before this Court, feeling aggrieved the permission accorded to the respondent to construct a building in his neighbourhood. After the writ petition was filed, the Municipal Corporation itself is said to have kept the permission in abeyance, through order, dated 10.08.2010. Bringing that fact to the notice of this Court, the petitioner filed W.P.M.P.No.23495 of 2010. An interim order was passed on 01.03.2011 granting interim injunction as prayed for. This contempt case is filed alleging that despite the interim orders of this Court, the respondent proceeded with the construction and completed the same. The respondent filed a counter affidavit stating that the construction was commenced on the basis of the permission accorded by the Municipal Corporation and that she is not aware of the interim order passed by this Court on 01.03.2011. It is stated that neither in the writ petition nor in the contempt case, notices were sent to the proper address. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. The interim order was to the effect that the respondent shall not proceed with the construction in the premises in question. The petitioner himself brought to the notice of this Court, when the contempt case came up for admission that the writ petition was dismissed on 08.08.2011. Initially, notice was ordered, obviously to know whether the construction was made after the copy of the interim order was received. Since there was an endorsement to the effect that the respondent refused to receive the notice, the contempt case was admitted and N.B.Ws. were issued. The version of the respondent is that she has not received the copy of the order, which is addressed to the premises bearing No.3-5-10 and that her correct address is H.No.3-5-1091/15/1, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad. Be that as it may, the fact that the respondent completed the construction was taken note of by this Court, while dismissing the writ petition. Writ Appeal filed against it is also said to have been dismissed. Under these circumstances, this Court does not find any basis to proceed against the respondent. Therefore, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 28.11.2011 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.636 of 2011 Date: 28.11.2011 JSU