IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24491 of 2009 SATRUGHAN BHAGAT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 04-11-2009 Heard. It is a renewal prayer, earlier prayer for bail having been rejected by an order passed in Cr.Misc.No.29869 of 2008. I have mentioned in the last paragraph of the order as follows:- “This is an illustrative case which could be cited as an incident under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.” Considering that observation I am not inclined to review the order earlier passed. The learned Sessions Judge has reported that the case was being tried by Ist Assistant Sessions Judge, Aurangabad and I have reason to believe that it must be lying in a vacant court. Hence the case must be withdrawn from that court and placeed before any Fast Track Court who shall attempt to dispose of the trial by examining the remaining witnesses within a further period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. In case the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period of nine months, the trial court shall itself release the petitioner on execution of a bond to its own satisfaction in connection with Barun P.S. Case No.92 of 2008. Petition is dismissed. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J ) BTiwary/