^^^^ E1 ^^^.i..-^.;-,'' ^^Nl2i|,^ IIEN^H 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP(Q Number...../../.^..4,77^.../2010 ).b[2. ^- PETITIONER: ^\^x.y" •^1^ l~7"n'/ ^A^ ,0^ /r. <J/%> ,^^p. .,.^ ^ Maita'i Educational and Culhiral Association, Bhilai ThroughSri K. Sudhakaran, President, aged about 70 years, S/o Late Shri R.Keshawan, R/o 13/31-B Ispat Nagar, Risali, Bhilai ,Dist. DURG, Chhattisgarh running Bhilai Maitri College, Risali Sector, Bhilai-Durg (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS t<5 VS^^ RESPONDENT: Pandit Ravishankar Shukla Vishwavidyalaya Through Regista-ar Raipur (Chhattisgarh) .^.y •y^ PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE Ofl^PPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTI RI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRFTS AND DIRECTIONS:- a^RSj^ETHfiPETITIQNER: £-° HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETITION (C) N0.1422 OF 2010 Maitri Educational and Cultural Assodation, Bhilai RESPONDENT Versus Pandit Ravishankar Shukla Vishwavidyalaya (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Jitendra Pali, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate for the respondent. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 8th dayof December, 2010) 1. Shri pali, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that in view of the subsequent development, the petition has become infructuous. 2. Shri Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that there is no reason to oppose the statement of the petitioner that the petition has become infructuous. 3. In view of foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Arun