I ( IN TFt HI H COURT OF ARN4T JCA Ar SN 3 ORE DArED THIS THE 0TH LA? OF JUNE 1998 SEFORE HE HONBLE MRJtrrICE H,L,DAPTU WRIT PETIfION I’IOs.7508 & 9226 TO_9229 OF 1998 BETWEEN: r± ,C 4 3.Raghavendran, No.116, V Cross, Khalasipalyam New Extn., Sann1ore560 002. ..,?etitinner (Sy Sri.S,Shekar Shetty, v, for Petitioner 1, Karnataa Iec, SoarS, Rep. Dy its Secretary. 2 The 4 ±sst, ing1ncer, V,E,t, 5—5 Unit 17, City tar-ct, Switching StatIon, Sangaiore 560 002, .,.esoondent (Sy Sri,U,IC,Gupaa, v, for Respondents ) C C C 2 —2— ?Irit Petitions fUed Under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India with an ffidavit, praying to Direct the re pondents to restore the electric connections to the meters R.R,No.4ILK 18392 to 1IDG 18385 and I5 41992 having conon mean installed at Premises No.116, 5th Dross, New Khalasipalyam Extn. 00 dangalore2, forthwith acc’oring to law & etc. writ Petittoa5 coming on for Preliminary Hearing in 3’ Group this day, the crt made tne following : ORD R Since comron iet one ofaet ann law are involved in all these writ petitions they are clubbed earn and dioo’ed of ny this eomon ordr, Petitioner is the owner of premises bearine No.116, 5th Cross, New Kalasioclyam Exto,, 9lore, cording to him the resoondent board had prov 4 ded , 3 —3— five electrical insta11atons bearing RR NoWILC 1832 to IG 18385 and 15 4182 he st Executive Engineer oy his notice dated46—ll979 had directed the petitimer to surender the aforesaid elect rical installations on the ground that oetr had demolished the old building and const ructed the new buldin After issuance of the notice the respondent ithority had also disconnected the supply of oower to the oetr., installati.ns. grieved by this action oetitioner had anroached this Courts This Court by its orcer dt,3-4l9R had direred the respondent authority to restore suonly of powfr to the petitioners installations subject to the netitioners reaularlv ocying the ener’y charges for the electricity consumed by theme Pursuant to the interim ordrs grant d by this Court the respondent authorities have rest red SUr1 o ower to the oetitioners installations 4 4 4 4 * 4 e4e Petitioners afterthe receirs of the notice dated 16e12—l’)97 have filed their objections by t’ieir letter dated. 23—12—1997 and in that they rcsist t% notice issued ôy t’ie res?ondents. ft is now for the .lssistant Executive Snqine’r to teas aproori te orders on the objecti’a so filed by tha petitioners before tilting any further action. In that view of the matter, these writ petitions are disposed off and a directi - n issued to the respondent auttoritie. to cmaidar tie objecti ns filed by thpetitioners by their letter dated 23—12—1997 to the notice issued Dv chet in accord arice wit) let and in accordance with the regulations of tne board as expeditiou& y as possi’fle at any rate wit’n three months from the date of recei’at of a cony of this Court’s order. I t? thess observatixis writ netition is disposed off. Ordered accorCingly. Sd/- JTJDQE r — ICR B r.by: ‘p. A c.byt