IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 20895 of 2004 Between: Mohd. Akbar, S/o Late Mohd, Qhasim, R/o H.No. 18-8-223/57/A, Rajasatnagar,Hyderabad - 500 059. ..... PETITIONER AND Chief Work Shop Manager, Railways, Lallaguda Work Shop, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation dated 5-10-2004 for appointment on compassionate ground to provide job to the deceased children under bred winner scheme and on sympathetic grounds giving effects to the letters No. LGDS/P/268/Comp/Vot dt.27-7-2K, No. LGD/P/565/Comp/CLIV. dt. 20-1-01 and No. LGD/WS/Com/CA/MA/dt. 12-7-2001. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.MOHD.GHOUSEUDDIN Counsel for the Respondent: MR.G.S.SANGHI The Court at the admission state made the following: ORDER: 1. The petitioner contends that his father worked in the respondent- Organization and died on 6-2-1988 while in service. The petitioner is 24 years old as on today and he was a minor by the date of the death of his father. He contends that he made an application to the respondent organization for appointment on compassionate grounds. Subsequently, on 20-2-2000, 27-07-2000 and 12-7-2001 he received letters from the respondent-Organization calling him to appear before them with original certificates for the purpose of consideration of his request for compassionate appointment in Group-D posts. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that subsequently the respondent did not issue any communication regarding his request for compassionate appointment. On 5-10- 2004 he submitted another representation regarding the inaction of the respondent and requesting them to pass appropriate orders regarding his request for compassionate appointment. The grievance of the petitioner is that so far the respondent did not pass any order on his request for compassionate appointment. He therefore, approached this Court through this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent to consider his representation dated 5-10-2004, for appointment on compassionate grounds. 3. In the light of the submissions made by the petitioner, the respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders on the representation made by the petitioner dated 5-10- 2004 according to rules regarding his request for appointment, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. The writ petition is accordingly, disposed of. No order as to costs. __________________ Dr.G.YETHIRAJULU, J Dated: 16-11-2004 LSK/VS To 1. Chief Work Shop Manager, Railways, Lallaguda Work Shop, Secunderabad. 2. Two C.D. copies.