IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2007 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 28511 of 2007(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- P.V.VISWANATHAN, 16/63, BINCY BUILDING, KALMANDAPAM, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD. 2. K.R.NALLASIVAM, 13/462, ELAYIDATHIL HOUSE, MANKAVU, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNA MENON SRI.M.JITHESH MENON GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.R.SABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.28511/07 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.C3/1857/2006/P DT.25.9.06 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.C3/2705/2007 DT.7/07 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT.31.7.07 SUBMITTED BY THE PEITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 28511 OF 2007 T ===================== Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2007 J U D G M E N T Through Ext.P3 representation filed before the 1st respondent, what the petitioner seeks to achieve is to object to the tentative timings that have been settled in favour of the 2nd respondent. Since Ext.P2 itself says that the settlement is subject to objections to be considered in a timing conference and as the petitioner has filed Ext.P3, 1st respondent has to take up the objections that are filed and consider the same in a timing conference. This the 1st respondent shall do, as expeditiously as possible, with notice to all parties concerned and finalise the proceedings within six weeks of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp