s. Nt- HIGH COURTOF GHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR WntPefitton<S]iNu. 7540-0f2006 ; • 1:' '•,1 —•••^'•i-, MQhan;Rafii Sahu, S/o Shn T^aHka. Ratn Sahu, aged ''ab<?W62',years; l(Retired ..emp'oyee); K'o-^Village ^aTay»Bpur, Ppst B6uneshwarpur, T'ahsil-;Suiguja, Dastt..8urgiya'(CG).:,'-::-,, .r-'1 . • • .'•^ ^:'-1-..... :, . RESPQNDE. TSJ-: '.1. 'gtste.-&f<3hhattisgarbAro"ghTl}s5Bcretary,Tubl<c •^-..'—.''..'..••• "; '...•' •'.; •'••;..: ' ' •'. ' . .. ' .• ^,-,..^' -,'•''• '^•. -.''.•..'•" Ilsaltl1f^ Fsnlilv ^rdferc Osoartiiient.lQl^.S ^ha.wa.n. mr Dt^U RairtiirY(-(Ti - 2;-T^,(^fMe4iealA^aUhOfficer,,,S^ Surguja,Distt. Surgi}a.(C©).. , /. L:;' .- 3. Th&; Seiupr Ascou&t Officer, Throu@fa£^©fficeof .AocouiifaHtGeaeralgRaipurBistt.RaipUF^^^ 4, T&e:X8^nct Treasury Officer, ."AmhikgpurpSurguja • 'Dtsft..Surgiya(CG)>/'"'..;;. - 1^'-;'::SS~'?:''~.'' 5. The Block Medical OfficCT, Ramanujnaga!^; Tahsil Surajpui,'Distt. Surgu}a{GG). ": . 't '^S'r7 . .. (WRTT PETmONTJNDKR AR'nC]'^ 226 OF THE.CXW^TTTimON OgjB*®IA) ; (SB: 'Hon^bleMr. Sattsli K.Agnihotri, J.) .:• -•S^" ; ; ' 1 Present : Shripushpendra,Patel.Adyoca.tc fbrthepetitioner. Shri Amritp Das.cPanel Lawver for the State. . ' ~ : Shri Ajay BarifcAdvocate fcr therespondeirtNo. 3. :-'.:.: •• " <Passed'on:l(i5°ldayofMay,2008) • ;.:::.::.•-.':. 1. This petition pertaias to paymenfofretiralbenefits, / ' .. ^ 2- Th's Court, ia the matter'jvfW.P. No, 4^42/2004 (Baynatfa Mandal Vs. The State of Glitiattisgffirfi and' otfaers) and other conriscted tnatters, directed tiie Gonimittee t&jeoHsider the'mafte'" oflhe retsral'dues as the dispn+ed question of ..factg wera .i:""e''yftd. - .The Commiittse ; was constitutsd by .the -. state ^Gpveiliment, •;gursuaat te the .prder dafed 19.06^006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 {Smt.Keja Bai Chandrakm- Vs. State Gc'vemment and others) aad orderdated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. "No. 105/2008 (State of Chhattisgarh a"d othsrs Vs. Baijnatii Mandat and mother). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31 of Januar^', 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. TheState of Chhattisgarh and othei-s) and other connected matters, as submitted by the leamed counsel appearingfor the pm-ties. I. This petitioa is disposed of in t!ie sanie temis i.e. t!ie Qffice of tlie AdvocBte Osiisral is dirsctsd to se'iid th©c&ss to the Ooimiittee, within a period pf 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, tiie Committes sha" issue notice to the petit'oner acd the offieei's coacemed,within a fiirther period of 15 days. The Coniniittee shal' consider and pass order, in accordance wit'i !aw, after affording proper oppoi'tunify offaeafitig to tbe petitioner. The petitioner aiid tlie officei-s concei-sied may file add'tiocal documents, if necessafy. The entire exercise, iacluding paymeat of retiral dues, if any, to tlie petitioner, be completed witiiin a period of foui m"nths from the date ofreceiptofacopyoftiHSorder. ^ - 4. One ext coov of the "aoers of the oetition s?iall be suoolied bv tiie leamed couase' appearing for t!ie pstitioner to Shri A-tBnto Das, Paiie' Lav.yer and Shri Ajay Barik, CounsQr for the respondent No. 3, tdday itself, for ti-ansfemng the same to the committee. Sahu Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotrl Judge