^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR DiV!SION BENCH Coram : HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SUNIL KUMAR SSNHA, J. APPELLANT PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Writ Appeal No.184/2008 Kuman Singh S/o Madan La!, aged about 42 years, resident of Parsuii, Post Office - Khertha Bazar, Tahsil Dondliohara, Dlstrict Durg, Chhattisgarh (CG) Versus 1. Ramchand S/io Madan Lal by caste - Sonkar, aged about 45 years, resident of Parsuli, Post Office Khertha Bazar, Sub Tahsll Mambangia Devri, Tahsii Dondiiohara, District Durg (CG) 2. The State of Chhattisgarh, through Coilector, Rajgarh (CG) Memo ofWrit ADpeal Under Section 2(11 of Chhattisaarh Hjqh Court ADpeal to DIvision Bench Act 2008 Read with Section 158(10Hn(BI oftheHJah Court of Chhattisaarh Ruies, 2007 Present: Shri RN Pandey, iearned counsei for the appeilant. Shri NKAgrawai, Deputy Advocate Generai forthe State / respondent No.2 ORDER (28th August, 2008 ) The foilowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: Shri NKAgrawai, learned Deputy Advocate GeneraS for the State has raised a preiiminary objection about the maintainabjjjty of the writ appeai as the Impugned order is passed by the learned Single Judge in a writ petition fiied under Articie 227 of the Constltution of India. 2) As the impugned order is passed in exercise of the writ jurisdlction under Articie 227 of the Constitution of indla, which is apparent from Page 2 of the memo of writ appeai, the wrlt appeai is iiable to be dismissed as not maintainable. 3) The writ appeai; therefore, is dismissed as not maintainabie; not withstandlng that, it is hopeiessiy barred bv limitation aiso. 1 Sd/- Chief Justicc Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge padma