@%9 BEFORE THE STATE ADM1N1$TRATIVE TRIB’mAL BENCH RAI?UR(M P ) .. Janardan Giri aged 42 years, Son cf Dubari Giri warden District Jail Durg Tahsil and District Burg. APPLICANT Versus RESPONDENTS The 3tate Govt.of M.P. Thtough The Secretary Jail Department Vallabh BhaWan, BHOPAL. 2. Director General of Prison, 01d Central Jail, Bhopal. 3. Superintendent Central Jail, Raipur. 4. i Superintendent, DiStrict Jail, Raigarh. .w- 3 APPLICATION U/S 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ACT, 1985 a < WW,WE.W am W . ...w..€.,§.z..3.zg%c5 200 mm ma l mam mwizrg'a Sinha mmfiwm $Wm‘ ‘WW , . 17.03.2010 Shri V.K. Chakravaity, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the petiti 3ner. Shri Bhaskar Payasi, Pan I Lawyer for the State. > By this petition, the petiioner has assailed legality and validity of nexure A—1). communication dated 16.7.1999 Earlier an order was pass d by the respondent on 17.2.1995 deciding wherein it was ordered that period from 3.1.1995 to 10.1.1995 shall be t eated as leave without pay as the petitioner was absentWom duty without prior sanction of leave by the Competent Authority. Petitioner did not chall nge that order. Letter dated 16.7.1999 is only s leave case attained finality in view of the order dated 17.2.1995 and if he petitioner had any grievance he could approach the Jail Headquarters. The petitioner has neith r assailed legality and validity of the order dated 17.2.1995 (Annexure R—1) Vield by the respondents, nor has approached the higher authority if at all he h d any grievance against the said order dated 17.2.1995. In this view of the matte , in the opinion of this Court, this petition is misconceived and is hereby dsmissed. lt will however be open for the yetitioner to approach the Comp tent Authority as stipulated in communication dated 16.7.1999 (Annexure A-1). There shall be no order a to costs. '3 the leave case of the petitione, i a communication intimating that n