IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO. 35 OF 2006 NO. 35 OF 2006 NO. 35 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2822 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 2822 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 2822 OF 2005 1. The Secretary, Kala Vidyamandir ] Trust & Anr. ] .. Appellants (Ori.Petitioners) Versus 1. Ms. Hemlata B. Nikam & 2 ors. ] .. Respondents (Ori.Respondents) Ms. Varsha Palav for the appellants. Mr. Rahul Thakur for the respondent No.1. Ms. Mamta Sadh, AGP, for respondents No.2 and 3. CORAM: R.M. LODHA & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 02ND MARCH, 2006 P.C. : . Heard. 2. The compliance of the order dated 30th July, 2001, by the appellants shall obviously be subject to the Writ Petition that has been admitted by the learned Single Judge and such compliance shall not create any equity of any nature whatsoever in favour of the respondent No.1-employee. : 2 : 3. With the aforesaid observation, Appeal is disposed of. 4. Appellants are at liberty to apply to the learned Single Judge for expeditious hearing of the Writ Petition. [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]