106wp265.11.odt 1 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No. 265 of 2011 (Chainu Irrapa Wadde .vs. The Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur and Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: MRS. V.K.TAHILRAMANI & M.L.TAHALIYANI, JJ. Date : 10/06/2011. Heard Mr. N.A.Badar, Adv. (appointed) for the petitioner and Mr.T.A.Mirza, A.P.P. for the respondents. The case of the petitioner is that he was granted parole; however, the Tahsil Office did not pass the surety and they were delaying his release on parole. Hence, the petitioner has raised grievance against the Tahsil Office and has prayed that he be released on parole and action be taken against persons responsible for delay. The learned A.P.P., on instructions, states that the petitioner has been released on parole on 18.4.2011 and thereafter, the parole period has been extended by thirty days and thereafter, by another thirty days. Thus, it is 106wp265.11.odt 2 . seen that the surety has been accepted by the Tahsil Office and the petitioner has been released on parole. The Tahsildar Bhamragarh, District Gadchiroli has filed an affidavit before this Court and has given the reasons for the delay caused in passing the surety. We find the reason to be adequate and no case is made out for any action against any person. Hence, the petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE jais