IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7978 of 2009 ***** 1. Grand Chandra Apartment Owner's Association, an Association of the Flat/Apartment Owner’s of Grand Chandra Apartment, situated at Fraser Road, P.S. Gandhi Maidan in the District and Town of Patna, through its Secretary Md. Hasan Imam son of Late Mojibur Rahman, resident of Flat No.104, Grand Chandra Apartment, Fraser Road, Patna. 2. Rupak Singh son of Sadanand Prasad Singh, resident of Flat No.101, Grand Chandra Apartment, Fraser Road, Patna. 3. Md. Belaluddin Khan son of Dr. Nihal Khan, resident of Flat No.102, Grand Chandra Apartment, Fraser Road, Patna. 4. Sayed Pravaiz Hassan son of Late Md. Raisuddin, resident of Flat No.401, Grand Chandra Apartment, Fraser Road, Patna. …. …. Petitioners Versus 1. The Patna Municipal Corporation through its Municipal Commissioner, Patna, Bihar. 2. The Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna, Bihar. 3. M/s Yunus Constructions Pvt. Ltd. a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at Grand Hotel Premises, Fraser Road, Patna-1. 4. Sri Harinder Prasad Singh son of Sri Chandradeo Singh, resident of Mohalla-Kadamkuan, New Area, P.S. Kadam Kuan in the town and district of Patna. 5. Sri Nagendra Prasad Singh son of Sri Chandradeo Singh, resident of Mohalla-Kadamkuan, New Area, P.S. Kadam Kuan in the town and district of Patna. 6. Sri Dilip Singh son of Sri Chandradeo Singh, resident of Mohalla-Kadamkuan, New Area, P.S. Kadam Kuan in the town and district of Patna. …. …. Respondents ----------- 2. 21.7.2009. Heard counsel for the parties. A supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no.3, the builder, wherein an order dated 18.7.2009 passed by the authorities of the Patna Municipal Corporation has been brought on record by virtue of this order the respondent Company has been directed to stay the construction of the 8th floor on what is known as Grand Chandra Apartment. Since the authorities have received certain complaints from the occupiers of the building, who are also petitioners in the present writ application. After having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondents, this Court is of the considered opinion that no - 2 - adjudication of any kind is required to be made by this Court at this stage because it is the sanction granted by the municipal authorities which is causing annoyance to the petitioners and it is being reconsidered, if I can use that expression, as it is reflected from the said order which has been passed. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim of the either side the matter is being relegated back to the municipal authorities that they shall hear the parties to the dispute and then decide the matter which shall in turn guide the future course of action by the either side. The writ application stands disposed of with above observation with a direction that the municipal authorities will try to expedite the matter and decide the lis at the shortest possible time, if due cooperation is rendered by both the sides. The Court expects adjudication preferably within eights weeks from the parties appearing before the authorities. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)