IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2011 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 34446 of 2011(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- KARIPODI SRI (THIROOR)MUNCHILOT BHAGAVATHY KSHETYHRA GOVERNING COMMITTEE REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, A.V.KRISHNAN, REGISTERED NO.265/92, KARIPODI, P.O.BEKAL-671318, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.K.SHRIHARI RAO MS.N.SHOBHA MR.K.S.BALAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT ANNEX, TRIVANDRUM- 695039. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, VIDHYANAGAR, KASARAGOD-671123. 3. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, KASARAGOD AT KANHANGAD, PIN 671315. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, COLLECTORATE, VIDHYANAGAR, KASARAGOD-671123. 5. THE UDMA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SPECIAL GRADE SECRETARY, UDMA P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT-671319. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.MUHAMMED SHAFI FOR R1 TO R5. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 34446 of 2011(E) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXHIBIT-P1. TRUE COPY OF THE EYE SKETCH SHOWING THE LIE OF THE TEMPLE,RESIDENTIAL HOUSES AND THE BURNING GROUND. EXHIBIT-P2. TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 22.11.2011 OF THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT WITH ANNEXURES. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. ..... // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No.34446 Of 2011 ---------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2011. J U D G M E N T Writ petition is filed for a direction commanding the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 representation submitted by the petitioner within a time frame. 2. When the matter is taken up for consideration today in the admission list, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Ext.P2 representation is pending before the 2nd respondent and requests this Court to issue a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 3. In view of the limited prayer sought for in the writ petition, this Court is of the view that the writ petition can be disposed of without issuing notice to the respondents. In the facts stated above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 representation within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, 5th respondent and other affected parties, if any. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-