IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1641 OF 1994 PETITION NO.1641 OF 1994 PETITION NO.1641 OF 1994 Union Bank of India Employees Trade Union Congress ..Petitioner Vs. Union Bank of India & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.Mahesh Londhe i/b.Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr.A.D.Shetty for Respondent No.1. Mr.M.K.Nesari for Respondent No.6. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2006 : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2006 : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for he Petitioner, the learned Counsel for Respondent No.1 and the learned Counsel for Respondent No.6. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that in spite of repeated attempts, there are no instructions from the Petitioner-Union. The learned Counsel for Respondent No.1 Bank Mr.Shetty categorically states that the Petition has become infructuous. In view thereof, Rule stands discharged. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)