IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1277 OF 2005 IN APPEAL NO. 299 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2516 OF 2004 Godrej Industries Ltd. .. Appellant V/s Rajaram R. Sah .. Respondent Mr.M.M. Varma i/b Mr.Rajesh Gehani for the Appellant. Mr.S.C. Naidu with Mr.Shailesh Pathak for the Respondent. CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 8TH AUGUST 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. : 1. A praecipe has been taken out by Mr.Naidu on behalf of the Respondent for speaking to minutes of the order passed by us on 5th May 2005. The submission is that the order grants the revised wages as per the affidavit of the employer, but it does not say anything about the other benefits and they are claimed to be continued under our order. The question agitated by the Appellant employer was with respect to these other - 2 - benefits and, therefore, when the order was passed, we granted stay as prayed, but made it clear and recorded that the employer had offered revised wages as per the affidavit filed by the employer before us. Impliedly, the workers were to be enitlted to what was stated as per the affidavit only. 2. Praecipe stands disposed of. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)