IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.57531 of 2007 ASHOK PASWAN …..Petitioner Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. MAHESHWAR PRASAD GUPTA ……Opposite parties ----------- 5. 12.11.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the opposite party and perused the impugned order dated 2.5.2007 granting bail to opposite party no. 2 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 19786 of 2007. The ground for cancellation of bail as per learned counsel is that opposite party no. 2 has not compromised all outstanding disputes as per direction given by this Court. On the other hand, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 submits that opposite party took all efforts to compromise all outstanding disputes but due to the attitude of the petitioner he did not succeed in the matter. Considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to cancel the bail so granted to opposite party no. 2. Accordingly, this application is rejected. However, endeavour should be made by the court concerned so that both the parties may take all efforts for settlement of their outstanding disputes. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)