IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6365 of 2011 HIRALAL YADAV SON OF LATE DEVAN YADAV. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ------- 2. 28.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the Electricity Act. It is alleged against the petitioner to have illegally consumed the electricity for running flour mill and on seeing the raiding party, the accused fled away. Due to the electricity theft, the Bihar State Electricity Board has suffered a revenue loss of Rs. 3,43,240/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the motor was purchased on 27.11.2009 and the seizure was made on 17.12.2009, when the motor was even not installed. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the Electricity supply to the area is not more than an hour, hence, the calculation of loss is absolutely frivolous. The seizure is only of some wire. Let the petitioner file an affidavit before the learned court below that he will deposit the admitted dues - 2 - within a period of three months. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- (fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Bisfi P.S. Case No. 286/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Devendra/ ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)