IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 1695 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: August 10, 2011 Suhagpati .. Petitioner Vs. Ram Kumar and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 5. Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana for respondent No.6. A.N. Jindal, J Assailed in this petition is the judgment dated 26.2.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehabad, dismissing the appeal filed by the accused- respondents against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 22.7.2008 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Fatehabad, with the modification that they were ordered to be released on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act. The only prayer made by the complainant/injured in this case is that no compensation has been awarded by the appellate court in the terms of Section 5 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 to the injured for the loss suffered by them on account of the injuries. Learned counsel for the respondents has offered to pay a sum of `10,000/- as compensation to the injured victim with the object of maintaining peace of harmony in the locality. This offer has been accepted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the consent of the parties, this revision petition is disposed of with the direction that the respondents No.1 to 5 would deposit a sum of `10,000/- (rupees ten thousands only) in all with the trial court within one month from today which would be received by the petitioner and the other injured in equal shares. August 10, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge