IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3840 OF 2010 DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 22, 2011 Hanuman Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. As per reply filed, necessary relief claimed in the writ petition has been granted. The writ petition, therefore, is rendered infructuous. Counsel for the petitioner, however, points out that interest has not been calculated properly, whereby some additional amount is being recovered. Let the petitioner file a representation, indicating his grievance, which shall be considered in accordance with law and appropriate order passed. Till the fresh orders are passed, recovery shall remain stayed. The petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court again in case he still feels aggrieved against the order ultimately passed by the respondents. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. September 22, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE