IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.721 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 18.01.2010 Hari Ram .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.M.K.Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Charu Tuli, Sr.DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Ms.Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of the order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to seek counter-reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioner seeks quashing of the orders dated 7.1.2008 (Annexure P-5) and 18.1.2008 (Annexure P-6) whereby his pay has been re-fixed and thereafter, an amount of Rs.1,69,083/- is sought to be recovered from him. C.W.P.No .721 of 2010 (O&M) 2 During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this case stands settled by the decision dated 27.5.2009 rendered by this Court in a bunch of writ petitions including CWP No.5568 of 2008 (Charan Dass and others versus State of Punjab and others). The writ petition is accordingly allowed in terms of the afore- stated decision of this Court in CWP No.5568 of 2008 (Charan Dass and others versus State of Punjab and others). Dasti. 18-01-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE