// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT PRINCIPAL SEAT, JODHPUR ORDER In S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Appl. No.3935/2009 {Lalit Kumar Porwal Vs. State of Rajasthan} Date of Order ::: 12th August, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Shri Sunil Mehta, Advocate, for Shri Vikas Balia, Counsel for petitioner Shri Mahipal Vishnoi, PP for the State #### By the Court: Learned counsel for petitioner contended that similarly situated co-accused Manohar Lal has been granted bail under Section 438, Cr.P.C. by the Sessions Judge, Bhilwara, whereas bail application of the petitioner has been dismissed, therefore, petitioner be also granted bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The case-diary was summoned and, on that basis, the learned Public Prosecutor drew a distinction in between the case of co-accused and present petitioner by referring the documentary as well as other evidence available in the case-diary. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and, after considering the order of the // 2 // Sessions Judge rejecting the bail application of the petitioner under Section 438, Cr.P.C., the case-diary and further that heavy amount of loan is involved in the present case, I am not inclined to allow this bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., hence the same is dismissed. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. //Jaiman//