IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.O.P.C. (T) No. 125 of 2008. Decided on: 29th September, 2010. Umesh Kumar Parashar. …Petitioner. -Versus- Ms. Renu Sahani and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Sunny Dhatwalia, Advocate vice Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent No. 3. : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. None for respondent No. 4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The only direction issued to the respondents was to consider the case of the petitioner after taking into consideration the relevant testimonials. It has come in the reply that the case of the petitioner was duly considered, however, he was not found suitable. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge September 29, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?