IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY VPH CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATON No. 260 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL No. 1324 OF 2004 Kailas Ramchandra Shelke & Ors. ... Applicants Vs Pralhad Genba Kapare ... Respondents (represented through L.Rs.) Mr. P.J. Pawar, for the Applicant. Mr. Nitin Deshpande, for the Respondent Nos. 1-A to 1-I and 2. CORAM : A. P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : JANUARY 30, 2009. P.C.: ---- 1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on record. 2. One Mr. Ramchandra Shelke was one of the defendants before the trial Court. However, neither he nor his L.Rs. were impleaded as parties in the first appeal before the District Court. Hence, by the present Application, a prayer is made for impleading L.Rs. as party respondents. The learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the applicants be permitted to be impleaded as party respondents in the Second Appeal, as the entire dispute between the parties have been resolved amicably out of Court and a - 2 - compromise pursis has been filed. In this view of the matter, the application is allowed. Applicant Nos. 1 to 3 are permitted to be impleaded as party respondents in the Second Appeal. Application is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- [ A. P. DESHPANDE, J.]