1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- WRIT CONTEMPT No. 95 of 2008 RICHPAL SINGH V/S BHAGWAN SAHAI MEENA & ORS. Mr. KC SAMDARIA, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. IS PAREEK AGC, for the respondent Date of Order : 4.11.2009 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI GOVIND MATHUR,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the parties. Despite time having been granted on 7.10.2009 no rejoinder has been filed. A perusal of the reply shows that cheque has been given to the petitioner i.e. the amount has been deposited in his account which fact is not disputed. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to contend that despite payment of this amount the petitioner is entitled to be paid some more amount if calculated as per the judgment of this Court dated. 15.7.2005. In the totality of circumstances, we do not feel inclined to continue the contempt proceedings for these calculations, and discrepancies. Since the order has been substantially complied with, the contempt proceedings are, therefore, dropped. It is, however, clarified that if the petitioner feels that he is entitled to some more amount than what has 2 been paid to the petitioner, then it will be open to the petitioner to execute the judgment of this Court dated. 15.7.2005 by filing appropriate execution application before the principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction concerned, and it is also directed that in the event of any such application being filed, the judgment shall be executed as decree of the Civil Court in accordance with the provisions of Order 21 C.P.C. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /Sushil/