IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36653 of 2008 VIJAY KUMAR MISHRA ….. PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ….. OPP. PARTY For the petitioner : - Sri Gouranga Chatterjee, Advocate For the O.P. : - Sri D. Mehta, APP ----------- 3. 12.11.2008 Heard Sri Gouranga Chatterjee, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri D. Mehta, APP for the State. Similarly situated accused Yogendra Prasad has been granted bail by the A.C.J.M., Jhanjharpur by order dated 28.2.2004. The resistance comes from the informant on the ground that the petitioner could not appear in spite of the best efforts made in that behalf nor he could be arrested in spite of the police going to the house of the petitioner on four occasions. The further contention is that if the petitioner is released on bail might be he is not available to the court for trial. Under the facts of the case and in the light of the fact that similarly situated accused persons have been granted bail, one by the A.C.J.M., Jhanjharpur, let petitioner Vijay Kumar Mishra be released from custody on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Jhanjharpur in connection with Jhanjharpur P.S. Case No. - 2 - 68 of 1997. The bailors must be the residence of Jhanjharpur and they shall furnish either their photo identify cards or driving licence attested by an Advocate practicing in the court there, besides the petitioner shall attend the proceedings on all dates, even if there is no purpose of attending the court, which could be trying the above noted case, any breach on the part of the petitioner would be sufficient for remanding him to custody. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)