3%' CF0000008964 ^ INTHE MADHYA PRADESHSTATE ADMINISTRATIVETRTIBUNALAT JABALPUR M.A. N0. OF 2000 c<^^^-^(6'r~ 1. Prof. N. K. Mishra S/o Late Shri Aditi Nandan Mishra Aged about 59 years, Government P. G. College, Jagdalpur District Bastar (M.P.) 2. Prof. Vimal Chandra Awasthi S/o Late Shri J. C. Awasthi, Aged about 58 years, Government P. G. College, Jagdalpur District Bastar (M.P.) ••f • ' " . _ . _. .._ .. • 3. M. L. Lakhanpal S/o Late Shri K. C. Lakhanpal, Aged about 46 years, Assistant Professor, Government P. G. College, JagdalpiTr District Bastar (M.P.) M. Ali S/o of Shri S. A. Ali, Aged about 41 yea.rs, Assistant Professor, Government P. G. College, Jagdalpur District Bastar (M.P.) Surya Kant ShirvastavaS/o Late Shri S. G. Shrivastava, Aged about45 years, Assistant Professor, Government P. G. College, Jagdalpur District Bastar (M.P.) ....APPLICNATS -VERSUS- ^•V1. Shri V. N. Kaul, Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, BHOPAL (M.P.) A Shri R.Tandekar, Commissioner, HigherEducation, Satpura Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) 3. Shri Vivek Dhand, Commissioner, Bastar Division, Jagdalpur (M.P.) 4. Shri K. L Sahu, Treasury Officer, Jagdalpur (M.P.) 5. Dr. R. D. Dass, Principal, Government P. G. College, Jagdalpur District Bastar (M.P.) i' <ii" I'li' ....RESPONDENTS '" CONTEMNERS APPUCATIQNUNDERSECTION170FTHEADMINISTRATIVETRIBUNALSACT.1985 iglteants, namedabove, beg to sybmit as under : y.-s y Kuni^?S;, ^^^ ;. f ^S.KM 'I 911 :|i|]-iB iN2^.' ^^-^3.-' A o ^^'''(^^; •' ..,>,.'^i:-'.,-/-y".- :;s4^^^S^t^^^s^^w^^hli^t^'^^^*;w^^i±^^iB^ .;:/,<i!^ V i::b'ln'B'Sfek S. I. "WSSS'% N-HC-22; an^l^l ft-ii.di ani^r sft^i^ fl^ 1' ? r ^||<<Ht|, yiai'y'is, 'fawi'My SlT^r.XR^ tiwcii aitich •qg^T .Q^l^s^^•}^f^^ 200 ' Iq^^T' 3iit?i Wtigr ^if??i SB : Hon'ble Shn Manjndra Mohan 23-03-2011 Shri Sandeep Dubey, counsel Heard. This contempt petition was fili Administrative Tribunal (In short 'the, order dated 11-09-1998 passed b^ No. 3259 of1991(Annexure A-1). Learned counsel for the petil order was passed by the Tribunal ft House Rent Allowance to the petitior( till date. He submits that at the rele\t different authorities have forwarded tt Principal ofthe College, Additional D| the Commjssioner, Higher Education| 2000 (Annexure R-2/111) filed alongl sanctioning payment to the petitioneij date, no payments have been ma<jle Treasury Officer impleaded as resp4 had rajsed certain objections and 4 payments have not been made to th^ After abblition of the Tribunal Court and in this petition; notices havl Taking into consideration the till date, po contempt proceedingl •*l''<I<'l<il-f ^wvS 4 fe^ <fatji< ^T srfigT 311^1 Shrivastava. J, for the petitioners. id by the petitionera before the State Tribunal") alleging non-compliance of the Tribunal in Original Applioation ioners submits that even though the y payment of Special Allowance and ers, the same has not been paid even |ant time, after the order was passed, re case of the petitioners including the rector, Higher Education, and later on, had issued a revised letter on 22-04- with the return of respondent No.2, fe. He submits that even thereafter, till He ftjrther submits that the then indent No.4 in this oontempt petition, ecause of those objections, till date, petitioners. this petition was tra.nsferred to this 3 not been issued to the respondents. 3ng pendency of this petition, and that have been initiated against the [Tft®'?feT! "t, XI-HC-22 sn^r^ir 1^;ii3i''CT^r 9TqR?^f?g -^ ^ Tumans i rh ...j^ :^M' i ; f/^{ ^^ •<11<<1<1''<, STi1y'l<B, («lc)ltiy< Sff^T^xra^ -S^.J.^.^ ^>'1^l ^^' ^WIsbKW------—^"-^200' ^€. f^ff' sii^r^snw'Hte •2_' WlfepfrT.WRff'? fci<ii <R|^|< ^r stfign sn^r respondents tonsideration the submission made by iat respondents No.1, 2 & 5 have died am not inolined to prooeed further in the matter. Rule is therefore disc^arged. However, the petitionere may bring to the notice and knowledge j)fthe present inoumbent ofthe office of Treasury, Jagdalpur, about the ord^r passed by the Tribunal on 11-09-1998 in Originat Application No.3259 of (1991 and various orders and directions issued by different authorities fron|) time to time including the letter dated 22-04-2000 (Annexure R-2/111) i^sued by the Commissioner, Higher Education, for oompliance of the cjrder. The petitioners would be at liberty w . '.. . ' . .... L to revive this contempt petition/ple afresh contempt petition, in oase, eventuality so arises. With the aforesaid obsen/at|on, the petition is tinally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shnvastava Judge '. / [4®''fe'i;