IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48785 of 2007 Madhu Singh, W/o Late Durga Singh, Resident of Mohalla Jagdeo Path More, Bailey Road, P.S. Shastrinagar, District Patna. --------- Petitioner Versus 1. State of Bihar. 2. Ajit Kumar, Son of Sri Rajeshwar Prasad Singh, Resident of Village Murlichak, P.O. Veterinary College, P.S. Gardanibagh, Dist. Patna. -------- Opposite Parties ----------- 3 29.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Sometimes good sense prevails but only after interference of the court. Here in this case, after filing of the complaint petition, the amount which was admittedly owned by the petitioner has been returned to the opposite party no.2. In this circumstance, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 submits that the opposite party no.2 is no longer interested in continuing with the trial of the complaint case. In that view of the matter, this application is allowed on concession and the impugned order taking cognizance is herby set aside. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)