CWP No.437/2006 10.08.2006 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ashwani Pathak, Central Government Counsel, for the respondents. A perusal of the petition shows that this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain this Writ Petition. The entire proceedings against the petitioner took place in Punjab and the orders were conveyed to him in Punjab, as far back as in 1988. There is nothing to show that any part of the cause of action arose in Himachal Pradesh. The only reason for filing the Writ Petition in this Court is that the petitioner, after retirement, has settled down in Himachal Pradesh. This is not a sufficient ground to clothe this Court with jurisdiction to entertain this Writ Petition. Hence, dismissed. ( Deepak Gupta ), J. August 10, 2006(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J.