CR NO.6476 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR NO.6476 of 2011 Date of decision:21.10.2011 Kamala ...Petitioner Versus Smt.Shikha Rani and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr.R.S.Budhwar, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. The present revision petition is directed against the order dated 28.9.2011 (Annexure P-2), whereby the evidence of the petitioner was closed. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. From the perusal of record, it emerges that vide order dated 28.9.2011 the evidence on behalf of defendants No. 1 and 2 was closed by order. The petitioner/defendant No.1 was present at the time of passing of the impugned order. He tendered documents Ex.D9 to D11 and closed his evidence. It is also alleged that the petitioner and respondent No.2 entered into an agreement with Ami Singh on 6.10.2005 and therefore, he wants to examine Sh.Ami Singh to prove the said agreement to sell. In the fact situation, this Court feels that the evidence sought to be placed on record may materially effect the outcome of the litigation pending between the parties. In view of these facts, the present petition is accepted and the CR NO.6476 of 2011 2 impugned order dated 28.9.2011 (P-2) is set aside and learned trial Court is directed to grant one more opportunity to the petitioner to examine Ami Singh son of Shri Banka Singh as his own risk and responsibility subject to payment of `10,000/- as costs. The trial Court shall fix a date for examination of Ami Singh. 21.10.2011 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) Mks JUDGE