IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 11968 of 2008. Decided on: 27th December, 2010. Man Singh. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. J.R. Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that the respondents are giving artificial breaks to him. It is evident from the Mandays-Chart filed alongwith the reply by the respondents that the petitioner has not been given any artificial breaks w.e.f. 1999 onwards. However, in the interest of justice, the respondents are directed not to give any artificial breaks to the petitioner because after putting in ten years’ continuous service, he is entitled to regularization. 2. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 27, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - - 3 -