IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 18TH OCTOBER 2011 / 26TH ASWINA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3439 of 2011() -------------------------------------- FIR IN CRIME NO.1674/2011 OF KOTTARAKKARA POLICE STATION. ........ PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED -------------------------------------- VINOD, S/O. HARIDASAN, PANAYIL PUTHEN VEEDU, PARUTHIYARA, ODANAVATTOM, VELIYAM VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. K.SIJU SRI.MOHAMMED RAFFI RESPONDENT(S): STATE ------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM.682 031. 2. VIJAYAN PILLAI, S/O. KARUNAKARAN PILLAI, VIJAYAVILASOM, VILANGARA, UMMANNOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK.691 506. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss CRMC. NO.3439/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)ANNEXURES A1:-THE COPY OF FIR WITH FIS IN CRIME NO.1674/2011 OF KOTTARAKKARA POLICE STATION. A2:-THE COPY OF LEGAL NOTICE AND THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 10-8-2011 ISSUED TO THE DAUGHTER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.3439 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of October 2011 O R D E R Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1674/2011 of Kottarakkara Police Station. The crime was registered alleging commission of offences under Secs.341 and 354 of IPC and also under Sec.119(a)(b) of the Kerala Police Act. It is contended that the complaint was lodged by a neighbour alleging that the petitioner had taken the photographs of his daughters. There is also allegation that petitioner has outraged the modesty of the complainant’s daughter (her name is shown in the F.I.S.). There is specific allegation that photographs of his daughters were taken by the petitioner herein. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had advanced money to the complainant’s daughters and only because he demanded for return of money such a false complaint has been given. Crl.M.C. No.3439 of 2011 -: 2 :- Truthfulness of that version would also be gone into at the time of investigation. Now it is only in the crime stage. The investigating officer has to look into those aspects at the appropriate stage. It is not proper for this Court to interfere with the investigation. Hence, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt