IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3375 of 2010 1. SMT.DEWANTI DEVI W/O KRISHNA BIHARI SINGH R/O VILL.- SINHA, P.S.- BARAHARA ( KRISHNA GARH ), DISTT.- BHOJPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH COLLECTOR, BHOJPUR AT ARA 2. THE D.C.L.R. BHOJPUR AT ARA 3. THE ANCHAL ADHIKARI BLOCK- BARAHARA AT BARAHARA- BHOJPUR 4. RAMAWATAR SINGH S/O RAM PRAVESH SINGH R/O VILL.- SINHA, P.S.- BARAHARA ( KRISHNA GARH ), DISTT.- BHOJPUR ----------- 2. 25.02.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that while passing the impugned orders dated 28.3.2005, 29.08.2006 and 10.10.2009, contained in Annexures 3,4 and 5, the revenue authorities including the Collector of the district have ignored the possession of the petitioner over the lands in-question although the same was reported to by the Halka Karmchari in his report dated 13.11.2004, Annexure-2 but ignoring the possession of the petitioner mutation has been allowed in favour of private Respondent No. 4. It is also submitted that petitioner was put in possession of the lands in-question after execution of the agreement to sell but ignoring the contents of the agreement for sale and factum of possession private respondent has obtained sale deed of the lands in-question from a stranger and on the basis of which mutation has been allowed without notice to the petitioner and the matter is now subjudice in a title suit bearing no. 314/2005 pending in the court of Subordinate Judge-I at Ara. 3. Having heard counsel for the petitioner and the State, I am of the view that the findings recorded in the three impugned orders dated, 28.3.2005, 29.08.2006 and 10.10.2009, Annexures-3,4 and 5 shall be subject to the result of Title Suit No. 314/2005 and in case the possession of the petitioner over the lands in-question is threatened on the basis of the aforesaid three impugned orders, petitioner shall have the liberty to approach the Civil Court for restraining the private respondent from interfering with her possession. 4. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition is disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)