IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41706 of 2008 BHOLA PANDIT @ JITENDRA MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 8.12.2008 Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. The case is under section 328, 302 etc. of the Indian Penal Code and the allegation is that in order to dismissing a compromise between the parties, the deceased was called to his house by the petitioner and on his return from there the deceased stated to the informant, his wife, that he has been poisoned by the petitioner and went to the N.M.C.H. The attention of the Court has been drawn to many facts in the case diary specially deposed by Shankar Rai in paragraph-57 in which it is stated that the informant had relationship with one Raj Kumar Mahto and the deceased was not liking it and he wanted to end his life in one occasion. His further statement is that on that particular night also he had seen the deceased indulging in similar act which ultimately ended his life. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Patna City, in connection with Mehandiganj P.S.case no.14 of 2008. Sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha, J ) - 2 - sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )