FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CA/13185/2010 NIRMALA V/S VIDYASAGAR 1. Heard respective counsel. 2. It is not in dispute that applicant was working with respondent No.1 as an Head Mistress. Her services were terminated. Said order was challenged by her before the School Tribunal by filing an appeal. Her appeal was dismissed. Said judgment and order is challenged in Writ Petition No.3550 of 2008 in this Court, which is pending adjudication before the learned Single Judge of this Court. 3. Shri Suryawanshi, learned Advocate for respondent No.1 fairly conceded that respondent No.1 is party to the said petition. However, according to him, applicant has no nexus with the present petition and therefore, she can not be allowed to intervene in this petition. 4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the contentions raised in the Civil Application, in our view, this application needs to be allowed. 5. In the result, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). The applicant be arrayed as party-respondent to the present petition, within a week. List the Writ Petition on board on 25.10.2010. No order as to costs. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) Dt.4.10.2010 akl