1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11993 OF 2011 ,In CRAST/25651/2011 BALIRAM LAKHULAL KAMBLE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR ... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Ingale Vivekanand V. AGP for Respondents/State: Mr.VH Dighe. --- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 21st NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : 1) Heard Mr.Ingle and learned AGP. There is delay of 1771 days in filing the CRA. It has occasioned, owing to dismissal of claim reference on 24.8.2006 by learned CJSD, Omerga. Reading the order, it is clear, original claimant expired during pendency of the proceedings. Legal representatives were not brought on record, nor they have taken any steps within the span of the period of six months. According to learned Counsel, the claimant/revision applicant could not attend the matter as the brief was transferred from the court of CJSD, Osmanabad to the the court of CJSD, Omerga. 2) Learned AGP submits the CRA is not 2 maintainable. However, since the very claim of the claimant is dismissed for want of prosecution, CRA would, certainly, be maintainable. 3) During the course of submissions, learned Counsel for the claimant/revision applicant submits that the revision applicant shall not claim interest for the period from the date of judgment dated 24.8.2006 till the revision is registered. Accepting this statement, delay of 1771 days, being sufficiently explained, the applicant was prevented under the circumstances to prosecute the matter, is condoned. CA for condonation of delay allowed as above. The revision application to comply other office objections, if any. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/