HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.16759 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.09.2011 **** Promila Rani . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. GS Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) (1). Notice of motion. Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, learned DAG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Having regard to the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to call upon the respondents to file their reply(ies)/affidavit(s), at this stage. (2). The petitioner is the wife of late Vijay Kumar, who was working as Assistant Sub Inspector in the Punjab Police and died while on active duty fighting terrorism on 26.07.1992. She seeks revised pension as per the last pay drawn by the deceased employee, under the instructions dated 14.09.1998 and 18.08.1998 along with consequential benefits. (3). Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that issue involved in the present case has been broadly dealt with in favour of the petitioner by this Court in CWP NO.7462 of 2009 titled as Abdul Rashid v. State of Punjab & Ors. decided on 06.08.2010. CWP No.16759 of 2011.doc - 2 – (4). The writ petition is accordingly allowed in terms of Abdul Rashid’s case (supra). (5). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 08.09.2011 Vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge