HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO W.P.No.8402 of 2010 Dated: 27-06-2011 Between: T.D.Malathy …Petitioner AND Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Deputy Commissioner, Circle-17, Malkajgiri, Hyderabad Respondent. This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO W.P.No.8402 of 2010 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy) Pursuant to the impugned demand notice issued by the respondent-Corporation, petitioner paid a sum of Rs.50,000/-out of the total demanded amount of Rs.1,45,590/- toward property tax and filed the present writ petition contending that the impugned notice issued by the respondent-Corporation is illegal and contrary to law as no details were furnished as to how the respondent-Corporation arrived at Rs.1,45,590/- towards property tax. It is further stated that earlier, a notice under Section 220(2) of H.M.C. Act was issued calling upon the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.58,236/- towards property tax commencing from 1.10.2007. Pursuant to the same, petitioner made a representation to the respondent-Corporation on 21.8.2009. It is alleged that so far, the said representation has not been disposed of nor the amount towards property tax was reduced. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 22.6.2011, learned standing counsel for respondent-Corporation was directed to find out whether the representation made by the petitioner was disposed of or not. Today, the learned standing counsel for respondent-Corporation represents that the representation made by the petitioner is still under consideration. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the details how the respondent-Corporation has calculated the property tax have not been furnished. In that view of the matter, the respondent-Corporation is directed to consider the representation made by the petitioner in proper perspective, if necessary, by giving an opportunity to the petitioner and dispose of the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the resultant order to the petitioner. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J. __________________ JUNE 27, 2011 RAJA ELANGO, J. Tsr.