1 112.11-apl+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION NO.112 OF 2011 M/s.TPI India Ltd. .. Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents Smt.Pravina J. Kanani for the applicant. Mr.Vinayak Katti i/b. S.V.Marwadi for respondent No.2. Mr.J.P.Kharge, APP for State. CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 2, 2011 PC. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Prayer clause (a) of the petition reads as under: “a) Allow the applicant and the respondent No.2 to compound the proceedings of C.C.No.1556/SS/07 pending on the file of Learned Special Metropolitan Magistrate, Small Causes Court, Mumbai as per the terms and conditions appearing in the memorandum of understanding dated 14/09/2009 entered into between the parties and pass appropriate orders for adjourning the said case sine die.” 2. Both the learned Counsel submit that substantial amounts are paid by the drawer of the cheques to the creditor payee and few installments are left. 3. It is between the parties to resolve the controversy. They can compound the offence by filing an appropriate application before the learned Judge in C.C.No.1556/SS/07. As a consequence, the matter is dragged before this Court since February, 2011. It is accordingly disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL,J.)