IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5364 of 2005 URMILA DEVI, wife of Sanjay Sah, resident of village – Mura, P O – Semrawn, P S – Mirganj, District – Gopalganj. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through Commissioner cum Secretary, Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Collector, Gopalganj. 3. The Director, Child Development Project, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Gopalganj. 5. The District Welfare Officer, Gopalganj. 6. The Child Development Project Officer, Hathua, Gopalganj. 7. The Block Development Officer, Hathua, Gopalganj. 8. The Incharge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Hathua, District – Gopalganj. 9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Semrawn, P.O. Semrawn, P.S. Mirganj, District – Gopalgnaj. ----------- 04. 25.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The earlier order passed in Annexure-7 by virtue of which the petitioner along with some other Anganbari Sewika were removed stands drastically modified by a subsequent notification or order dated 3.12.2005. The District Magistrate has allowed the petitioner Urmila Devi to get back on her assignment. However, the order states that there will be no payment of honorarium for the period when she was removed till she was ordered to be reinstated. The entitlement of the honorarium of the petitioner for this period can at best be decided by the concerned authority provided petitioner makes out a cogent reason. No order is required to be passed by the High Court on this score as it is left open to the local administration to look into such grievance or issue or the kind of order which is required to be passed taking the ground reality. The writ application is disposed of with liberty to the 2 petitioner to make an application before the Districts Magistrate, who shall look in to the matter. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)