:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1020 OF 2005 Sarjerao Bapu Shinde ... Applicant versus Changuna Sarjerao Shinde and another ... Respondents ... Ms.Vaidehi Mhaispurkar, for the Applicant. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 20th April 2005 P.C.: . Heard Counsel for the Petitioner. I see no reason to interfere with the concurrent view taken by the two Courts below. The revisional Court has also examined all aspects of the matter and has negatived the plea of the Applicant that the Respondent wife had sufficient income to maintain herself and it was no more necessary to provide for her maintenance as was determined by :2: the Court on the earlier occasion. There is no infirmity either in the approach or the finding recorded by the two courts below. Not a case for interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Dismissed. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)