IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9107 of 2010 1. Ram Snehi Das, son of Ram Das, resident of Village- Ashthua, P.S. Singhwara, District-Darbhanga. 2. Shankar Sah, son of Rameshwar Sah, resident of Village- Karauni, P.S. Singhwara, District-Darbhanga. ……….Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar ……………………………Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 15. 03. 2010. Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Nirbhay Kumar Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners are accused in a case instituted under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are not named in the F.I.R. and no incriminating articles have been recovered either from the house of the petitioners or from their possession. It is also submitted that they have not been put on Test Identification Parade till date and only on the basis of suspicion they have remanded in the present case in view of requisition made by the Police. Learned counsel for the State has pointed out that there are some criminal cases against these petitioners. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners namely, Ram Snehi Das and Shankar Sah are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief 2 Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, in connection with Bisfi P.S. Case No. 97/07, subject to conditions (a) that one of the bailors must be Govt. Servant or close family member of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner, (b) if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the information/prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned and (c) the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. m.p. (Birendra Prasad Verma,J.)