IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3798 of 2006 RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Satish Chandra For the respondents: Mr. Suraj Bansh Roy --------- 03. 05/08/2008 During the pendency of the writ application the dispute now boils down to payment of disability pension from 7th June, 2002 till 30.9.2005. Earlier payment has already been made as would be evident from the counter affidavit which has been filed on behalf of the State Bank of India. It is also stated in the counter affidavit that the bank has written a letter to respondent No.2 i.e. Chief C.D.A. (Pension), Allahabad to issue a duplicate copy of the sanction letter so that petitioner’s claim with regard to this period can also be redressed. Payment after the month of October, 2005 is being made to the petitioner as is evident from the pleading. In view of this limited issue which is holding back the payment to the petitioner for the period indicated above the writ application is disposed of with a direction upon respondent No.2 C.D.A. (Pension), Allahabad that he shall take cognizance of the bank’s letter addressed to him and issue a duplicate copy of the sanction letter to facilitate the payment of disability pension to the petitioner. Let it be done within a period of three months from the date of communication/production of a copy of this order. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)