IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1045 of 2010 TRILOKI THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 06.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that the order dated 21.05.1998 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Narkatiaganj, West Champaran in Case No. 1006 of 1992 ( Laxmi Thakur Vs. Sukhal Yadav & Ors.) under section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not being given effect to. Learned counsel for the State submits that with respect to the above grievance petitioner ought to have approached the respondent no.3 and not this Court under the writ proceeding. Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner, after some argument, seeks permission to withdraw the writ application to enable the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the respondent no.3 with regard to the grievances as highlighted in this writ application. The writ application accordingly stands dismissed as withdrawn. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)