..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1398 OF 2008 Kalidas Chandrakant Gore. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Ms.Pranali Kakade, Adv. h/f. Mr.Subhash Hulyalkar, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.H.J.Dedia, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 2nd September, 2008. DATED : 2nd September, 2008. DATED : 2nd September, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R. No.134 of 2008 of Khadki Police Station, District : Pune. The said case is under Section 395 of IPC. 3. The prosecution case is that the applicant along with other accused rang the doorbell of the flat of the complainant. The wife of the complainant opened the door. The accused persons gagged her mouth. It is stated that all the accused persons, including the applicant, were ..(2).. armed with dangerous weapons at that time. Two of the accused persons entered the house and assaulted and injured the complainant with weapons and robbed him. The complainant raised shouts. While running away the culprits came to be caught by the residents of the society. The applicant is one of the persons who was caught. Thus, it is seen that the applicant was caught red-handed on the spot. No doubt two of the co-accused have been released on bail. However, it is seen that those co-accused were not the persons who were apprehended on the spot. Thus, there is no case of parity. Looking to the fact that the applicant has been caught red-handed, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant bail. Application for bail is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)