1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1892/2004 Hakam Ram vs LRs of Gangu And Ors. Date of order : 11.12.2007. HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Vijay Aggarwal,for the petitioner. Mr.HS Sandhu,for the respondent. <><><> The document in question was sent for impounding and payment of stamp duty by the order of the trial court dated 2nd April, 1996. The trial court said order was challenged by preferring this writ petition on 3.8.2004. This court stayed the operation of the said order dated 2nd April, 1996 and directed the trial court to continue to proceed with the trial expeditiously. The office after inquiring from the court below reported that civil original suit itself has been decided by the trial court on 7th Nov., 2007. In view of the above reason since the document itself has been admitted in evidence and suit has been decided, therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, the party aggrieved against admitting the document in evidence may raise its objection before the appellate 2 court in case any appeal is preferred and the appellate court may decide the objection in accordance with law only. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-