1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 48 OF 2009 Maruti Balu Kirulkar ... Appellants (since deceased, through heirs and L.R.s.) v/s Nanibai Hari Bhika (since deceased through heirs and L.R.s) & ors. ... Respondents Mr.S.S.Patwardhan for the appellants. Mr.S.S.Shah for respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 19TH MARCH, 2010 P.C.: 1. The second appeal has been preferred against the concurrent findings of fact recorded by both the Courts below. It has been held that the plaintiff has proved that she was entitled to a share in the suit and that her share was to the extent of 2 Acres and 1 Guntha in Survey No.354/2. The Courts below have further held that the plaintiff was already put in possession of the suit property and there is a 2 possession receipt in respect thereof. Both the Courts below have disbelieved that the contention raised by the defendant that the suit had been filed beyond the period of limitation. 2. In my opinion, there is no need to interfere with the concurrent findings of fact recorded by both the Courts below. They have further held that the contention of the defendant that she was in adverse possession of the suit property is also not accepted. 3. No question of law, much less, substantial questions of law are involved in the present second appeal. 4. Hence, the second appeal stands dismissed. ..... 3