IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43037 of 2010 RUKHI DEVI wife of Late Kewal Yadav, resident of village Pachrukhiya, P.S. Gobardhana, in the District of West Champaran. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.3.2011 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. Petitioner is an accused for offences punishable under section 304(B)/34 of the Penal Code. 3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that even though the case was instituted under Section 304(B) of the IPC charge-sheet was submitted under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. 4. He avers that in the said circumstances the husband of the deceased has been enlarged on bail by the orders of this Court dated 17.3.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No.45260 of 2010. Learned counsel argues that the petitioner of the instant case is the mother-in-law of the deceased and has been falsely implicated in this case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within fifteen days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the petitioner, namely, Rukhi Devi, is directed to be enlarged on bail on executing bail bond of Rs. 10,000.00(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha 2 in connection with Gobardhana P.S. Case No. 16 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Prakash (S.N.Hussain, J.)