IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8260 of 2009 KAILASH SAHNI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 20.07.2009 After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State this Court is not inclined to adjudicate the matter at this stage because the nature of the dispute requires to be looked into by the local authorities and take cognizance of the allegations and grievance made in the writ on verification of facts at the local level and sort out the problem, if the allegations made in the writ application are otherwise true. Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the statements made in the writ application, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the District Magistrate, Samastipur who after due verification of the allegation will ensure passing an appropriate order or direction to the concerned authority. The Court expects a decision within three months from the date of filing of such application. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)