1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 285 OF 2009 Abdulkarim Abdulla &Ors. ... Petitioners Vs. State of Maharahtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. O.K.Shaikh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. S.G.Surana, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Ms. Uma Palsule Desai, AGP,for respondent Nos. 1,3 & 5. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 11th January, 2010. P.C. 1. The petitioners are the respondents in Writ Petition (Lodging) No. 2648 of 2007 where Rule has been issued. By the present petition, the petitioners once again are seeking to quash the orders of the authorities whereby the challenge to the slum declaration has been negatived. A society has been formed for the purpose of carrying out SRA Scheme. The petitioners are members of that Scheme and the petitioners are to be rehabilitated under that Scheme. In the petition earlier referred to, interim relief was sought. That was rejected. The petitioners herein had also approached the Hon’ble Supreme Court by way of SLP 2 which is also dismissed. 2. It was sought to be contended by the petitioners that the present petition has been filed on the ground that fraud has been practised, namely, that their signatures have been forged. The petitioners, nowhere in the petition, have averred that their signatures were forged. The learned Counsel drew our attention to ground (H). However, we do not find any specific averment or submission by the petitioners herein that their signatures were forged. 3. In the light of that, in our opinion, this would not be a fit case to exercise our Extraordinary Jurisdiction. It will be open to the petitioners to challenge if they have any grievance in the pending petition before this Court. With the above observations, the petition is disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)