IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37182 of 2010 Binod Singh @ Diwan Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 7/ 15.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. After investigation, no material could be collected by the I.O. regarding his involvement in the case. So, charge-sheet is submitted against co-accused, Suresh Pathak, Nagender Yadav and Vinay Pathak. Only in course of trial of those co-accused persons, some of the witnesses are naming this petitioner basing which petitioner is apprehending his arrest which cannot be justified. Taking the same into consideration, prayer of the petitioner for bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with S. Tr. No. 326 of 2009 arising out of Gaya Mufassil P.S. Case No. 053 of 2001 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. District and Sessions Judge, IIIrd, Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)