IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.22988 of 2006 Between: Peddinti Pentaiah. … Petitioner And The State of A.P., reptd., by Principal Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad and three others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: None Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Home. This Court made the following: ORDER:- At the interlocutory stage, this Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner sought for a Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent No.3 in completing the investigation and arresting the accused in Crime No.248 of 2006 of Vikarabad Police Station, as illegal and unconstitutional. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that on 31- 10-2006 final report was filed by respondent No.4 before the Judicial I Class Magistrate, Vikarabad, referring the complaint as false. In view of the said submission, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to file a protest petition before the jurisdictional Magistrate. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.29265 of 2006 is dismissed as infructuous. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:22-6-2009 MNR