1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Appeal against Order No.77 of 2006 1. Manish S/o Ramniwas Gupta, Aged about 29 years, Occupation : Cultivator and Business. 2. Pravin S/o Shriniwas Gupta, Aged about 35 years, Occupation : Business. Both residents of Central Avenue, Nagpur. ... Appellants Versus 1. Narendra S/o Dayalchand Nagpal, Aged about 53 years, Occupation : Business, R/o C/o Shri L.M. Dhoble, 393-A, Indraprastha, Hanuman Nagar, Nagpur. 2. Bharatkumar S/o Shantilal Thakkar, Aged about 49 years, Occupation : Business, R/o Gandhibagh, Nagpur. 3. Arvindkumar S/o Ganpatbhai Patel, Aged about 40 years, Occupation : Business, R/o Wardhaman Nagar, Nagpur. 2 4. Anilkumar S/o Jangaldas Chelwani, Aged about 36 years, Occupation – Business, Resident of Jaripatka, Nagpur. 5. Sau. Bhagyashree w/o Milind Joshi,' Aged about 35 years, Occupation : Business, R/o Jagnath Budhwari, Nagpur. ... Respondents Shri S.V. Purohit, Advocate for Appellants. Shri V.G. Wankhede, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM : R.C. Chavan, J. DATE : 30th July, 2008 Oral Judgment : 1. Shri V.G. Wankhede, learned counsel for respondent No.1/original plaintiff, states that since the stay has been granted in this case on 13-9-2008, virtually the injunction has been nullified and, therefore, he would take steps to have the lis registered in the interest of his client and in that view of the matter, the Appeal against Order itself may be disposed of. 2. Shri S.V. Purohit, learned counsel for the appellants/original defendants, states that if the respondent/plaintiff is to register the lis to secure his interest, there will be no question of seeking an injunction by this appeal. 3 3. In view of this, rule is made absolute. No costs. JUDGE Lanjewar