IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 2046 of 2005 Date of decision: December 02, 2010 Parmod Kumar Jain .. Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Chaudhary, AAG, Punjab for the respondent. A.N. Jindal, J The accused-petitioner was slapped with sentence vide judgment dated 13.10.2004 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, passed by the trial court. However, they instead of filing the appeal (which was competent) preferred the revision petition before the learned Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, whereupon, learned Additional Sessions Judge (Ad-hoc) Ludhiana dismissed the revision petition. Now he is before this Court in the second revision petition. It appears that the petitioner has chosen the wrong forum while filing the revision petition instead of filing appeal before the learned Sessions Judge, Ludhaina. Any way, this second revision petition being not maintainable is dismissed. December 02, 2010 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge