IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 877 OF 200 PETITION NO. 877 OF 200 PETITION NO. 877 OF 2001 Konark Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. ....... Petitioner. versus Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation and others ...... Respondents. ..... Mr. Y.S. Jahagirdar with Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni for the petitioner. Mr. C.J. Sawant with Mr. R.M. Sawant for Respondents 1 to 3. Mr. C.R.Sonawane AGP for State -respondent no.4. NMr. V.A. Gangal for respsondent no.5. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR & MRS. MRS. MRS. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. DATED; DATED; DATED; 23RD AUGUST, 2004. 23RD AUGUST, 2004. 23RD AUGUST, 2004. P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. This petition can be conveniently disposed of by treating the demand notice dated 25-1-2001 issued by Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation to the petitioner is a notice to show cause why the sum mentioned in it be not recovered. The company has already filed a reply dated 5-2-2001 which has not been considered or decided. We therefore direct the Corporation to take into consideration this reply and decide the issues raised therein. Parties shall be at liberty to raise all points which they want to raise in relation to this issue at the time when the notice is being decided. It would be neessary however to quash the order of attachment already passed when the Corporation is at liberty after the decision to take such steps, as are permissible under law. Petition accordingly disposed of. 2. Partiest o act on an authenticated copy of this order. xxxx