Crl. Misc. No. M-12927 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-12927 of 2011 Date of Decision: May 5, 2011 Pardeep Singla …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.G.S. Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) In view of the earlier two petitions for pre-arrest bail having been dismissed by this Court, no ground is made out for re-appreciating the same pleas. However, counsel for the petitioner submits that after the decision of earlier petitions for pre-arrest bail by this Court, new facts and circumstances have come into existence entitling the petitioner for the concession of pre-arrest bail. Crl. Misc. No. M-12927 of 2011 [2] The subsequent events pointed out by counsel for the petitioner may be put before the Sessions Court for appreciation by filing an application for pre-arrest bail. It is made clear that in case there are glaring subsequent events indicative of innocence of the petitioner, it will be open to the said Court to consider the said circumstances and grant concession of pre-arrest bail. Disposed of with the abovesaid liberty. May 5, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE