1 SB Civil Writ Petition No.10081/2008 Anirudh Kumar. vs. Smt. Chando Devi & Anr. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10081/2008 Anirudh Kumar. vs. Smt. Chando Devi and another. Date : 7.1.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.JK Bhaiya, for the petitioner. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition to challenge two orders passed by two courts below – trial court dated 23.5.2008 and appellate court dated 9.9.2008. The petitioner's application for grant of injunction was rejected by the trial court and the appellate court also upheld that finding after observing that there is no prima-facie case in favour of the plaintiff/petitioner nor there exists any legal right in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner's total claim was that 2 SB Civil Writ Petition No.10081/2008 Anirudh Kumar. vs. Smt. Chando Devi & Anr. he was having irrigation facility through the land of the respondents/defendant with the consent of the respondents since last 8 years. However, admittedly that consent is said o be oral consent and according to the petitioner, he invested Rs.20 lakhs for laying down water channel through this land. Two courts below have considered all these facts in detail and thereafter, concurrently held that there is no prima-facie case in favour of the petitioner. In view of the above, this writ petition, having no merits, is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya