IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S} N0. ^^ /2011 PETTTTONER • ^ .-I. . .A^- ^>%;,^-";... ..^^?c ^.•^••3.<' ...s%^ \^€^ ^asnarayan Diwakar, S/o Late Suritram Diwakar, aged about 45 years, Lecturer (Hindi) Govt. Boys Higher Secondary School, Hardi Bazar, Block- Pali, bistrict- Korba (C.6.). VERSUS ^.^ '€»' RESPONDENTS ^- : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Tribal Welfare bepartment, b.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, bistt. - Raipur (C.6.) , 2. .Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Korba, bistt.- Korba (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Pali, Block-Pali. Distt.-Korba (C.6.) WRIT PETETION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTEON OF INblA ._L^-—.....-—— ^" ;\ fh-^ VS£KI fi.HC-22 'Ys^- STT^T^T [^rli<=h 3T|^T 5h^lirt» ^f^cT ^ ~3~^[ ^ll<41d<4, ^Ti1^4i<o, f^^K-iy 3nit^r ^f^ ^...UW.2.Z.S..^l^ ^MCir 9bH(ch ^P^T' 3^r'^c?T^R Trf^T cr»i^f<n^1vi'RTR^rf ^ 'feTst <R?i^i< '^^rf^m^n^T SB ; IHon>ble Shri Manindra MEohan Shrivaatava, J.1 11.5.2011 Shri A.S. Rajput, counseljfor tiie petitioner. Shri A. V. Shridh^r, Panel Lawyer for (he State/respondents, on advance| Heard on admission. copy. Leamed counsel appeari^ig for tlie petitioner submits fhat the petitioner is entitledto be4efit oftwo advance increinents <m account of he having passe(d B.Ed. examination before his appointment at his own cos1(. It is submitted that fhe issue involved in fhe present petitio: saine has been finaUy decided the case of Asha Saxenct vs. MPJRfSC)S9. It is further subnaitted similar vie\v in its order ^i is no longer res integra and the I by the Hon'ble Supreme Coiut fcn 1 State MM-P' ^ '^^^^^^^^S^^ SBQ Aiat this Court has also taken a dated 06-02-2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Lejamed counsel for tlie petitioaer further draws attention of fhi^ Court to order dated 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal No. 124 |of 2009, wherein relying upon fhe judgment of fhe Supreiae Cdurt in fhe case of Asha Saxcna (supra) and fhe order passed by this Court in another Writ Appeal ^ JJXI-HC-22 ^5c[';^FTI^T, ^Tll^^Ko, [^<ni<-iy 3ff^r xra^? 1R8^C<1I 5h^ich*****'*<<****'********<'*<>*'****<"*tTF^ 2( 'i^^T' 3TT^T^I fqii<=n 3T1^T 5^^ict» ^f^a Praveen. .^T^l ^f^T ^rf^T z No.87/2009, directions have case for grant of two advance 21-09-1974 issued by tlie verification of the facts pleaded] Leamed counsel for the| the petitioner would also be In view of the finally disposed off wifh a to consider and decide tfae claU advance increments as per the State of Madhya Pradesi pleaded in (he petition, wifhin date of receipt of copy of fhis or b^en altn ct5|<Ll(<n<flrl 'RTH^Tf ^ ft^ <F3l<^l< '^^rf^FT^n^T Issued for consideration of ttie |increments as per circular dated $tate of Madhya Pradesh, after |in the petition. respondents submits fhat case of coilisidered on the same Unes. statem^nt made above, ttiis petition is direc|tion to the respondent aufhorities of the petitioner for ^rant of two cir^ular dated 21-09-1974 issued by (i, after verification of the facts |a period of fhree months from fhe 1der. Sd/- M.inindraMohanShrivastava Judge [^