IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 10244 of 2005 Between: 1.K.C.Nagaraja Naik, S/o. K.C.Pratap Naik, R/o. Flat No.304, Chandrapirya Apartments, Adimthy Nagar, Anantapur. 2.K.Bharat Singh Naik, S/o. Narasimha Naik, R/o. D.No. 7-17-372, Mallikarjunapet, Guntur. 3.N.Ravi Babu, S/o. Ramana Rao, R/o. Allur Villge & Post, Via Nizampatnam, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Union Public Service Commission, Government of India, rep.by Chairman, New Delhi-1 2 The AP Public Service Commission, Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by Chairman, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more in the nature of writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not considering the representation of the petitioners dated 31.3.2005 and 7.4.2005 seeking reschedule of the 1st phase of the Group I mains in consonance with the schedule of the 1st respondent as being descriminatory, arbitrary, bias, illegal and unconstitutional as opposed to the guarantes embodies in articles 14,15,16,19,21 and 46 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent Viz. the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Hyderabad to reschedule the Group I main examinations in so far as the SC and ST candidates are concerned and pass such other order or orders or as are deemed fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. B.Prakasam for MR.B.S.V.PRAKASH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: MR.KANTHI NARAHARI Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Mr.M.vijaya Kumar The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER Sri B.Prakasam, Advocate representing Sri B.S.V.Prakash Kumar, counsel for the petitioners states that the grievance in this writ petition no longer survives. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. __________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 13TH JUNE 2005 *TSNR To 1 The Chairman, Union Public Service Commission, Government of India, New Delhi-1 2 The Chairman, AP Public Service Commission, Government of Andhra Pradesh,Hyderabad. 3 Two C.D.Copies.