1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7605 OF 2008 Varun Jagdish Birla .. Petitioner Versus Smt.Pournima Rajendra Raut .. Respondent Mr.Rahul Kadam for petitioner Mrs.Lalita Panchakshari for respondent CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 26th June 2009. P.C.: 1] This matter was adjourned from time to time as it appears that initially parties had agreed to have the main dispute resolved by mediation. They approached a Mediator after an order was passed in that behalf. The Mediator has reported that no settlement is possible. After hearing parties, I am of the opinion that there is no reason to interfere at this stage, in the jurisdiction conferred upon this Court by Article 227, with the order under challenge. The said order permits an amendment to written statement in a pending suit. That application made by the respondents before me has been allowed by the Trial Court on 12th 1 September 2008. In my view, it would be open for the petitioner plaintiff to raise all pleas pertaining to the impugned order in case the final order in the suit is adverse to him. All contentions in that behalf of both sides are kept open. Petition dismissed accordingly. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)