IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 12TH AUGUST 2011 / 21ST SRAVANA 1933 RPFC.No. 32 of 2011 --------------------------- MC.66/2010 of FAMILY COURT, THIRUVALLA .................... REVISION PETITIONER/COUNTER PETITIONER: BINU MATHEW, S/O.MATHEW, MANJAKKAL, CHITTAZHA, VATTAPPARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.K.SATHEESH KUMAR SRI.K.S.PRAVEEN RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: SHERIN VARGHESE, D/O.LATE P.C.VARGHESE, THALASSERIL PUTHEN PURAYIL, OTHERA, ERAVIPERROR VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA, PIN 689 101. BY ADV. SRI.T.P.PRADEEP THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.S.Satheesachandran, J. ------------------------------------------- R.P.(FC)No.32 of 2011 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of August, 2011 ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for withdrawal of the revision without prejudice to his right to canvass the grounds raised in appropriate proceedings in relation to execution of the order awarding maintenance to the respondent. Learned counsel submits that the revision petitioner/husband is entitled to raise the offer even at the stage of execution of the order and such right may be preserved while granting him permission to withdraw the revision. Without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to raise whatever right available to him under law, revision is permitted to be withdrawn. Revision is dismissed. (S.S.Satheesachandran, Judge) tkv