In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No. 16605 of 2004 Date of decision : 22.8.2008 Reliance Communications Infrastructure Limited ..... Petitioner vs The State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Sindhu, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondents. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the vires of Haryana Local Area Development Tax Act, 2000. It is not disputed that a Division Bench of this court vide judgment reported as Jindal Strips Limited and another vs State of Haryana and others (2007) 29 PHT 385 (P&H), has already held the Act to be ultra vires to the Constitution of India. For the reasons stated in Jindal's case (supra), the petition is allowed in the same terms. It shall be open to the respondents to seek their remedy in accordance with law. 22.8.2008 (Rajesh Bindal) vs JudgeIn the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No. 16605 of 2004 Date of decision : 22.8.2008 Reliance Communications Infrastructure Limited ..... Petitioner vs The State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Sindhu, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondents. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the vires of Haryana Local Area Development Tax Act, 2000. It is not disputed that a Division Bench of this court vide judgment reported as Jindal Strips Limited and another vs State of Haryana and others (2007) 29 PHT 385 (P&H), has already held the Act to be ultra vires to the Constitution of India. For the reasons stated in Jindal's case (supra), the petition is allowed in the same terms. It shall be open to the respondents to seek their remedy in accordance with law. 22.8.2008 (Rajesh Bindal) vs Judge