Criminal Appeal No.8 OF 1994 (U/S.) [Appeal against the judgment and order dated 29.1.1994 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Saran, Chapra in Criminal Appeal No.2 of 1990] MASHUQUL HAQUE, SON OF LATE ZUMRATI SARDAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BODHICHAK, P.S. PARSA, (NOW MAKER), P.O. PIRMAKER, IN THE DISTRICT OF SARAN (COMPLAINANT) …………………….. Appellant Versus 1. HADIS MIAN SON OF LATE ABDUL RAHMAN MIAN, RESIDENT OF VILALGE BODHICHAK, P.S. PARSA, (NOW MAKER), P.O. PIRMAKER, THE DISTRICT OF SARAN 2. MOSTT. NAZIBAN, WIFE OF MD. YUSUF, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PAIGH SHEIKHPURA MOHANA, P.S. AND P.O. AMAUR, IN THE DISTRICT OF SARAN 3. SHEO PARSAN RAI, SON OF SURAJ RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BODHICHAK, P.S. PARSA, (NOW MAKER), P.O. PIRMAKER, IN THE DISTRICT OF SARAN (ACCUSED PERSONS) ---------------------- Respondents For the Appellant : Mr. Rajendra Kishore Prasad, Advocate Mr. Manojeshwar Pd. Sinha, Advocate Mr. Rohit Kishore Prasad, Advocate Mr. Suresh Chandra Pd. Sinha, Advocate Mr. Ratan Kumar Sonal, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Birendra Naht Mishra, Advocate --------- P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH Anjana Prakash, J: The appellant is aggrieved with the judgment dated 29.1.1994 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Saran, Chapra in Criminal Appeal No.2 of 1990, by which it has allowed the appeal of the respondent nos.1 to 3 against the judgment dated 21.12.1989 passed in Complaint case No.805 of 1980 Trial No.576 of 1989 by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Chapra. On going through the appellate order, I find that it has - 2 - considered the factum as well as the legal aspects of the matter and no reasonable person can disagree with the conclusion arrived at by the Appellate Court. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Patna High Court Dated, 5th April, 2011. NAFR/ Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )