IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36675 of 2008 ISHWAR KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.11.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Learned Counsel submits that the statements in Para 10 of the application of grant of anticipatory bail to the proprietor is an incorrect statement of fact. In fact it has been rejected. The petitioner is an employee of the godown for LPG apprehends arrest in a Police case under Sections 406. 420, 120B of the Penal Code and Sections 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The allegations are of sale in black market depriving the genuine customers. The anticipatory bail of co-accused is stated to have been rejected and he has been enlarged subsequently on regular bail. No special circumstances have been urged to accord any different treatment to the petitioner. This application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merit including grant of regular bail to co-accused without being prejudiced by the present order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)