IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 11596 of 2009 Between: Vittla Nagabhushamma W/o. Mallikarjuna Rao R/o. Sitharamapuram Talaprolu, Ungatur Mandal, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Tahsildar, Unguturu, Krishna District. 2 The Collector, Krishna District at Machilipatnam. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nuzvid, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent trying to assign the land of Sy.No.1169/1, admeasuring 1-09 cents, Telaprolu Village, Unguturu Mandal, Krishna District, in favour of third parties without cancelling assignment of the petitioner as null and void and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.H.V.R.R.SWAMY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: The writ petition is premature and is also mis-framed. The writ petitioner seeks a declaration that the action of the 2nd respondent in “trying to assign the land of Sy.No.1169/1 admeasuring 1-09 cents, Telaprolu Village, Unguturu Mandal, Krishna District in favour of third parties without canceling assignment of the petitioner”, as null and void. The Tahasildar, Unguturu, the Collector, Krishna District and the Revenue Divisional Officer, Nuzvid are impleaded as respondents and neither the State nor an Instrumentality of the State are parties to the writ petition. Even according to the petitioner, no order of assignment has been passed assigning the land, which is already claimed to have assigned to the petitioner, in favour of the third parties. In the absence of any order of assignment passed in favour of the third parties, no cause of action accrues. The writ petition is premature and is also mis-framed and is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _______________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 15th June, 2009. GRR