IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.449 of 2011 GULJAR MUKHIYA . --- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SUNITA DEVI --- OPP. PARTIES. ----------- 02 15.04.2011 Heard both sides. Petitioner is husband. He is aggrieved by order dated 03.11.2010 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Motihari , East Champaran in Maintenance case no. 134 of 2010 whereby on a consideration of the materials on record and after hearing both the sides ad interim maintenance in the sum of Rs. 2000/- (two thousand) per month has been allowed payable to the applicant/wife/opposite party no.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready and willing to live with opposite party no.2 inasmuch as he has already filed an application under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for restoration of conjugal rights which is pending. Be that as it may, since by the order impugned only ad interim maintenance has been directed to be paid, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the said order. Entire issue is open before the Court where the parties may lead evidence and prove their respective cases. This Court would, however, observe that grant of ad interim maintenance in the sum of Rs. 2000/- (two thousand) shall 2 not prejudice the case of the parties while adjudicating the issues on merit finally. The application stands disposed of. Sym (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)