IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-20365 of 2009 Date of Decision: March 17, 2010 Mohinder Singh & Another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - None for the petitioners. Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent No.1. Mr. M.D.S. Gill, Advocate, for Mr. J.B.S. Gill, Advocate, for respondent No.2. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing complaint titled `Baghel Singh vs. Mohinder Singh & others’ (Annexure P-1) under Sections 323, 324, 326, 452, 506 IPC and subsequent proceedings. It transpires that the criminal complaint was filed by respondent No.2, Baghel Singh son of Rattan Singh. The Judicial Crl. Misc. No. M-20365 of 2009 [2] Magistrate Ist Class, Dasuya convicted the petitioners where-against appeal has been preferred which is pending adjudication. During the pendency of the appeal, co-accused, Baghel Singh son of Shabir Singh and Harnam Singh son of Labho died. The petitioners survive. During the pendency of the appeal, the parties seem to have entered into compromise. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 contends that the complainant would have no objection to the matter being referred to Lower Appellate Court. Since the appeal is pending adjudication, it would be appropriate for the parties to approach the Court of Appeal which Court shall take into account the changed facts and circumstances and pass orders as required by law. Ordered accordingly. The petition is disposed of. (AJAI LAMBA) March 17, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?