THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.11142 of 2004 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3. The main grievance of the petitioners in this writ petition is that respondent Nos.1 to 3 are not taking any action against the fourth respondent for making constructions in the area meant for park, in spite of a representation being made in this regard on 01.04.2004. This Court, while issuing Rule nisi, as long back as on 02.07.2004 granted interim directions as prayed for. When the matter came up on the last occasion, this Court directed the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development appearing for the respondents to get instructions as to the status of the subject land. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Assistant Government Pleader has produced some photographs showing that the subject land is vacant and submitted that the fourth respondent has not made any constructions. The photographs produced by the learned Assistant Government Pleader are placed on record At the hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in view of the interim directions granted by this Court on 02.07.2004, the third respondent-Gram Panchayat has prevented the fourth respondent from making any constructions in the subject land, which is earmarked for park. In spite of service of notice, none appears for the fourth respondent. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, both the learned counsel agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following direction: The third respondent-Gram Panchayat is directed to develop the subject land, which is earmarked for park, by raising some trees and protect the same from being encroached. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of, with the above direction. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date:13.04.2010 VGB