IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2223 of 2009 Date of Decision : 5.11.2009 S.D.Katyal and another .....Petitioners versus Smt.Shanti Devi .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Mandeep S.Sachdev, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Puneet Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition has been preferred by the landlords against the order dated 12.2.2009 passed by the Appellate Authority, Jalandhar, whereby the application under Order 23 Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC, moved by the petitioner-landlords for withdrawal of the eviction petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action, has been dismissed. Notice of motion was issued and passing of the final order by the Appellate Authority, Jalandhar was stayed. C.R. No.2223 of 2009 2 Learned counsel for the parties jointly state that during the pendency of this revision petition, the parties have settled their dispute vide Compromise Deed dated 28.10.2009, a copy whereof has been placed on record (Annexure P-9). In terms of the Compromise deed, the respondent-tenant has agreed to vacate the demised premises and to hand- over the vacant physical possession thereof to the petitioner-landlords within a period of one month from the date of execution of the Compromise Deed. Petitioner No.1 as well as the respondent are present in Court and they have separately deposed on oath in support of the compromise. In this view of the matter, this revision petition is disposed of in terms of the Compromise Deed dated 28.10.2009 (Annexure P-9) arrived at between the parties. 5-11-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE