WP(C) 6331/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. M. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. A . Dasgupta, learned counsel for the respondent Bank. The grievance of the petitioner is in respect of non-payment of incremen t, variable pay, encashment of PL and LFC. Mr. Dasgupta, learned counsel for the respondent Bank submits that the petitioner had already tendered his resignatio n from the Bank’s service. Be that as it may, the Bank authority may examine the claim of the petitioner. If it is found that the petitioner is entitled to the amounts in the aforesaid h eads, the Bank authority may pay the same facilitating which the petitioner may submit a representation to the Bank authority indicating his claim under head wi se. In the event of making such an application, the authority may decide the sam e in accordance with law. Whatever may be the outcome of consideration of the ca se of the petitioner, same shall be communicated to him. Entire exercise shall b e carried out as expeditiously as possible preferably within two months.