IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 4TH DECEMBER 2009 / 13TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 34443 of 2009(A) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- NAUSHAD M.N, S/O. SAIDALAVI, MAMPILLY NHJALIL HOUSE, THRITHALA P.O., PIN-679 534, PALAKKAD DIST. BY MR.P.CHANDRASEKHAR, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD. 3. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PATTAMBI P.O., PIN 679 303, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 4. THE MANAGER, C.E.U.P. SCHOOL, PARUDUR P.O., PIN 679 303, PALAKKAD DIST. BY MR.T.T. MUHAMOOD, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.34443 OF 2009 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of December, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner herein is an Arabic Teacher in the C.E.U.P.School, Paradur. He has been continuing from 18.07.2007 as Arabic Teacher in the school. The appointment of the petitioner has been duly approved by the 1st respondent and the petitioner was receiving pay and allowances also. During the year 2007-2008, as per the staff fixation order, the petitioner was allowed to continue in the post of Arabic Teacher applying 1:40 teacher-student ratio. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that from 14.07.2007, the petitioner was not being paid salary though he had been working in the school. The petitioner approached this Court by filing W.P.(C) No.5805/2008 and during the pendency of the said writ petition, staff fixation order was revised resulting in retrenchment of the petitioner. The petitioner thereafter filed W.P.(C) No.8162/2009 which was allowed as per judgment dated W.P.(C) No.34443/2009 2 06.07.2009 and Exhibit P1 is the copy of the said judgment. In the subsequent year also namely, in 2008-2009 no post was sanctioned to accommodate the petitioner. The Manager filed an appeal against Exhibit P2 staff fixation order and the said appeal was rejected as per Exhibit P3. 3. Challenging Exhibit P3, a revision petition has been filed by the Manager as per Exhibit P4 which is pending before the 1st respondent. The petitioner prays that the same may be directed to be disposed of within a time frame. There will be a direction to the 1st respondent to take a decision on Exhibit P4, after hearing the petitioner and the Manager, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition for compliance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp