<s~v r at iisi.fc BE^ •—Ili •]!<•] //!// P.(S)No,$'2&0/; [T] ...-••:^b .4^€^:> .5^y State ofChhattisgarh and Bakward Class Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) f' VlataRukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti. HlUi rTlTTtRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON fS) No. 5860 of2009 PETITIQNER RESPONDENTS Salikram Lahai'e. 'VERSUS itate ofCliliattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shi-i Satlsh K. Agmhotri. J. Present: Shi'i S.P.Kale, Advocate tbr the petitioner. Ms. Smiita Jam. Pasicl Law\'er for the StateTesoondents 1 & (ORAL' (Passed on 09"' day of October, 2009) Heard leanied counsel for the parties. 1. Leanied counsel appearmg tor the pelitioiier submits that fhe instant petition is squarely covered by the decision ofthis Court rendered m Smt. A.Latl v. State of Chhcfttisgarh & Others , thus the petitioner iiiay be penmtted to make a representation to decide liis case in the light of aforestated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No. 3-Institute is a Govenmient Aided school and the pstitioner is a teacher witiiinfiie sanctioned strensth. 2. Learned couasei appearing for the State submits that in the event; the petitioaer makes a representation, the same will be considered aiid decided, in accordance with Savv- witliin a period of four wseks irom the date of receipt ofthe representation. 3. In view of foregomg, according to the leamed counsei appearing for the petitioner, nothiag survives inthis petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ pelition is disposed of Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ' 2007 ('11 BLJ 265