IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.331 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO.331 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO.331 OF 2004 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Anil Singh i/b.D.R.Shah for appellant. Shri Arshad Handaday for respondent nos.1A to 1B abd 1D to 1K. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 27th August, 2007 : 27th August, 2007 : 27th August, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The Trial Court by an impugned order dated 22nd August, 2003 has directed parties to maintain status quo. This Court has also grant the status quo as of 21st January, 2004. This order of status quo has been inforce since than. The learned counsel for respondent makes statement that inspite of status ( 2 ) quo order granted by the Trial Court as well as the High Court the appellants are constructing structures on the suit property. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant is denying the same. The respondent is therefore at liberty to take appropriate action. However, the order of granting of status quo shall continue till further order. 2. The Civil Application is therefore disposed off accordingly with liberty. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]