IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2947 of 2006 JAGAT NARAIN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 4.8.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that since he has not been able to contact his client he is not in a position to rebut the statement and evidence which has been brought on record by the respondents. The benefit of second time bound promotion and the consequential payment of Rs. 53182.00 has already been authorized in favour of the petitioner. The respondents have also brought evidence on record to show that even the Accountant General, Bihar has been required to make corresponding correction in the Pension Payment Order issued earlier in favour of the petitioner. In view of the above no adjudication is required in the writ application. If there is any discrepancy in accounting or otherwise the petitioner can approach the respondents for settlement of the account, if the occasion arises. This writ application stands disposed of with the above direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)