IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17919 of 2009 RAMESH CHAUDHARY son of Brij Bihari Chaudhary Resident of village Karan,P.S.Baghaila (Nokha),Distt. Rohtas at Sasaram Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.19272 of 2009 RAMANAND MAHTO son of Shri Bishwanath Singh Resident of village Takiya,P.S.Sasaram,Distt.Rohtas at Sasaram Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.24212 of 2009 BAKULI @ CHITRANJAN CHAUDHARY son of Surendra Chaudhary Resident of village Bhatauli,P.S.Baghaila (Nokha),Distt.Rohtas Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 30.7.2009 All the above three applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order because they have arisen out of one occurrence. The petitioners seek bail in a case which has been registered for offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code against petitioners Ramesh Chaudhary, Bakuli Chaudhary and two others regarding robbery of Rs.3500/- from the informant. As the informant has named two accused in the first information report, namely petitioners Ramesh Chaudhary (Cr.Misc.No.17919 of 2009) and Bakuli @ Chitranjan Chaudhary (Cr.Misc.No.24212 of l2009), I am not inclined to grant bail to them presently. Accordingly, their prayer for bail is rejected. However, they may renew their prayer for bail before the court below after completing one year in custody. So far petitioner Ramanand Mahto (Cr.Misc.No.19272 of - 2 - 2009) is concerned, he is not named in the first information report. So his case is different from those two petitioners whose prayer for bail has been rejected. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner Ramanand Mahto is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned court, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S.Case No. 798 of 2008. Md.S. (Shyam Kishore Sharma,J.)