FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4722 OF 2009 (FOR STAY) IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1814 OF 2009 [Girish Uttamrao Kohok V/S. Ratan Hiraji Deore & anr.] ____________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : Court’s or Judge’s orders orders : ____________________________________________________________________________ Mr. M.M. Sathaye, adv.for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Kulkarni, adv.for respondent no.1. Mr. S.S. Prabhu, adv.for respondent no.2. CORAM : A.P. DESHPANDE, & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATED : 5th MAY, 2010. P.C. :- 1. For the present, the learned counsel for the applicant-appellant restricts his prayer for interim relief only to the following extent :- (i) That respondents no.1 and 2 be directed to disclose the fact of pendency of this appeal to the prospective purchaser in case the suit property or part of the suit property, either before or after the development, is sold, alienated or transferred. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents, in all fairness, does not oppose the said prayer and agree that as and when the suit property or part of it, either before or after development, is sold, alienated or transferred, the prospective purchaser would be informed in writing about the pendency of the appeal and the said fact will also be placed on record of the Court by both the respondents. In that view of the matter, no orders are necessary to be passed. 3. With this, the Civil Application stands disposed off. [A.P. DESHPANDE, J] [SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J]