IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3040 of 2009. Decided on: 28.09.2011. Isha Sood … Petitioner. Versus LIC and anr. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, C. J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. For the petitioner : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Narender Sharma, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner has approached this Court with certain grievances pertaining to selection and appointment of Senior Assistants in LIC. In the nature of order, we propose to pass, it is not necessary to go into the merits of the case, in view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there are a few vacancies available and that in case, steps are taken to fill-up those - 2 - vacancies, the petitioner could get appointment, having been placed in the wait list. 2. In view of the submissions, as above, there will be a direction to the second respondent to see whether the petitioner can be accommodated in terms of vacancy position in the wait list. In case wait list is still alive and in case the vacancies are still available, needful action, in light of aforesaid observations, shall be taken by the second respondent within one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the second respondent. 3. The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Authenticated copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice September 28, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/pankaj) Judge.