IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1063 of 2009 VINAY KUMAR 'PAPPU' Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the appellant : Mr. Dronacharya, Advocate For the respondents 1 to 4: Mr. Harendra Prasad Singh, GA -VI 2 20/8/2009 Heard Mr. Dronacharya, counsel for the appellant and Mr. Harendra Prasad Singh, counsel for the State. In view of the order proposes to be passed, it is not necessary to issue notice to any of the respondents. The present appellant is aggrieved by an interim order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 4.8.2009. Now election which was scheduled to be held on 5th August, 2009 has been stayed. Even if we look into the matter on merit and set aside the said order, no useful purpose will be served because the date of election is already over. Under such circumstances without going into the issue raised in this appeal, we request the learned Single Judge to take the writ petition (CWJ. 2 No.8603 of 2009) for disposal on merit on the date fixed and to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible. With the above observation, this letters patent appeal is disposed of. Neyaz/ (P. K. Misra, CJ.) (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)