SI£€$iE WE &E @ //1// w mmmaammT OFJUDICATUREAT BILASPUR C G w P. {S} Non§3§b /2009 C/Q7&§L~ ETE’E‘EONER Kalyan Prasad Tande S/O Late Dholaram Age about 41 y6ars, Q . R/o Mata Rukmani Sewa Sansthan ‘ gv Dimrapal, Jagdalpur (C.G.) VERSUS l , } . State ofChhattisgarh Through— Secretary, Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Bakward Class Welfare Department, D.K¢S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) 2. The Commissioner, Tribal Development Raipur (CG) The Secretary, Mata Rukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tah, & District~Jagdalpur (CG) W WPEHHGNUNBERARHCLESmOFHIE CONS'HTUTION @F llNDIA P @WM HIGH COURT OF‘CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 5250 of2009 Kalyan Prasad Tande. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF NDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri S.P.Ka1e, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt.’ Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER ORAL) (Passeti on 14 day of September, 2009) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Smt. A.Lall v. State of Chham'sgarh & Others}, thus the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to decide his case in the light of aforestated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No. 3-Institute is a Government Aided school and the petitioner is a teacher Within the sanctioned strength. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks hom the date of receipt of the representation. 3. In view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. t r PETITIONER .1 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of? l l Sd/— 'i Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2007 (1) BLJ 265 ,_,,, g