IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWPs No. 717 of 2011 & 720 of 2011. Decided on: 24th Feb, 2011. CWP No.717 of 2011: Richa Arya Versus State of H.P. and others. CWP No.720 of 2011: Rachna Sharma Versus State of H.P. and others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr.R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr.J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim the benefit of contract service for the purpose of increment, pension and vacation salary. As far as the increment and pension is concerned, this Court has already held that contract service cannot be equated with ad hoc service followed by regular service and it is for the government to consider the matter. As far as the vacation salary is concerned, the matters are now covered in favour of the petitioners by the decision of this Court in Baldev Singh versus State of H.P. & Others. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the second respondent to release the vacation salary to the petitioners in case 2 the same has not been granted to them so far. As far as the other grievances are concerned, it will be open to them to approach the first respondent. 2. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 24th Feb., 2011 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tilak/cs) Judge.