1 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 406 OF 2009 Ashok Maruti Salvi & Ors. ... Petitioners. Vs. The Indian Hume Pipe Company & Ors. … Respondent. Ms. M. Sadh with Joseph Fernandes i/b Mr. Y.S. Singh, for the Petitioners. Mr. A.R. Patil, AGP for Respondent No.1. ..... CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATE : 22 nd APRIL, 2010. P.C. 1. Having heard the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Petitioners, and perusing the Order of the City Civil Court, operative part of which is at pages 70 to 79 of the paper-book, I am of the opinion that the Contemnors before this Court are admittedly not parties to the suit. It is only communication of the Order through the Registrar, City Civil Court so as to inform the Collector/Contemnors about the pendency of the proceedings that has been made the foundation of the allegations of civil contempt. 2. I am afraid it cannot be done in law when the Contemnors are not the parties to the proceedings and secondly there is no order as 2 understood in law. The Contempt Petition is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)