1/2 SB CIVIL TRANSFER APPLICATION NO.75/07 (Rajkumari Jain vs. Smt. Sushila Devi) DATE OF ORDER : 13/7/2009 HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.R.S.Mankad, for the petitioner. Mr.Deepak Menaria, for the respondent. This transfer application has been filed under Section 24 of CPC claiming transfer of suit no. 214/2004 from the Court of Learned ADJ No.1, Udaipur to any other Court outside Udaipur. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no lawyer is ready to represent the case of plaintiff as one of the defendants was advocate of the bar at Udaipur and even his son, who is on record after his death is also an advocate practicing at Udaipur. In the additional affidavit filed by the plaintiff-petitioner it is stated that she had contacted as many as seven lawyers but they have refused to represent her case in the said Court. These averments are disputed and denied by the learned counsel for the respondents, who submits that suit is listed for final arguments in the Court and no good ground is made out for transfer of the proceedings. Admittedly, there are no allegations of bias against the Presiding Officer. It is also not understood that in such a big bar as is 2/2 available at Udaipur no lawyer is ready to represent the case merely because two of the defendants are practicing there as advocates. This reason sought to be made out for transfer of proceedings outside Udaipur is not appreciated and understood by this Court. Accordingly, transfer application is rejected. (DR.VINEET KOTHARI), J. item no.52 baweja/-