^ HIGHCOURT OFCHHAmSGARHAT BILASPUR SinaleBench ; Hon'bIeShri iJaadishBhalla. Aa. C.J, WrltSeti'BoiiNo. 2S5 of2»Xi3 Petltioner Respondents ^- Tilak Dubey aged 36 years S/o Daya Prasad Dubey Place-Dondi, Tahsil-Balod, Distt. Durg (C.G.) (Non-aBB!lcantNo.2) Versus 1. Kartikram S/o Suklal Halba, age 45 yeare (ClaimantNo.1) 2. Devdhar S/o Kartikram, age 25 years. (Claimant No.2) 3. Hemlal S/o Kartikram, age 16 years. (CialmantNo.3) 4. Kamdev S/o Kartikram, age 12 years (Claimaht No.41 5. Anita D/o Kartik Ram, age 14 yeare (Claimant No.5) 51. .No. 3,4,&5 through Guardian - Kartikram S/o Suklal, All Caste-Halba, R/o Place-Dondi, Tahsil- Balod, Distt. Durg(C,0.) 6. Harvindar @ Bittu |S/o Resham Singh, Panj'abi R/o Place-Near Gadarpul, Purana Market, Datlirajhara, Tah. Balod, Distt.- Durg(C.G.) (Driveralleaedl 7. New India Company, l-1ead Cffice, Raipur (Lnsurance Comoanv) Writ Petition under Artiole 227 ofthe Constitution of India Present : Shri Sameer Sahu, oounsel for the petitioner. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 17fh August, 2007) Learned counsel for the petitioner informs that this petition has become infructuous. Acoordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. K- 8d/- Acting ChiefJustice