^T^. IN THE SIGS CQQBS O? JTO)ICMBRS_A3',BILASPQB__(CHH.A22£SGAgHl. WEIT PB'riTIOB' Mo. -24-5-6 QF 2006 PBNII05ESBS:- 1. As'flish Tiwari, aged at>out 23 years, Son of Erisnna Kumar Siwari, residen-b of Sattipara, nea.r Karbala, P.0. AmbitEapur, Dlst: Sarguja (C.S). ^•:^' .^••f^'"^'' <>-/.<*'<i>.-t^kV -.-*'" ..-^^-^ ^>y/" •c,^ <^'»&.-"' y'" s&gpossms. :- WEI'E 2. Prasanna Parimal, aged atiout 19_yeai Son of S.B.Badelt, resideat of B.T.I. Colony, Bajaalpara, P.0. Saraipall, Bxs'fc: fiahasaiaiand (C.G) 3. Abhisnefc Prasad Beo, aged about 20 years, Son of Ajit Prasad Deo, resident (i) Gaandra Bhawan, Kastur Tovn, P.0. Baidyaaatfi Deo 6'aar, Jiiarlmand. (ii) House Mo.30, honse of Suresh Sharna, Patel nagar, Sitaranpara, Patna (Bihar). Vsss'aa 1. Pt.Ravi Shaalsar Shukla D'niversity, Raipur; tflrougia its Registrar. 2. Proctor-eum-Gflainaan, Anbi-ragging GeBaBi-btee, Pt.Bavl Snankesr Sh-akla ITniversity, Balpur(0.&). AEIICLS 2£6/227.e?_THE,COHa;IsroiOi_OE_^SSIA BEI'.ajES OF im jffiTCTIGN !2/' HIGH COURT OP JUlWCATURB^CTIHATTISaAItH: BILASPCK Siagle Bench: Hon'ble Shrt Satish K. Agnlhotri, J. W.P. No. 2456 OF 2006 Petitioners Versus Respondents Ashish Tiwari & ofhers. Pt. Ravi Shaxikar Sbukla Universily, Raipur aad another. Dr. Shailesh Ahuja, counsel for the petitioners. None for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (11th May, 2006) Leamed coitnsel appearing for the petitioners subniits that the petitioners were rusticated by order dated l.10.2005 foUowed by a directioa for eviction fium the hostel, The petitioners chaUeaged the order of rusttcation before this Court in W.P. No. 5247/2005. This Court by order dated 25th Januaiy, 2006, quashed fhe unpugned action of the Uiuversity, rusticating the petitioners/students, on the gtioiind that the inipugned order was passed without coniplyuig with fhe maadate of the principles of natural justice and fair play in actioiL This Court, however, reserved the Uberty to the University to take appropriate action against aU the petitioners/students, in accoidauce with law and in the light of the said order. Purauant to or in fiuAerance of, the 5. 6. said order, the Registrar respoiident/uaiversity by fhe order dated 1.2.2006 (AruiexuTe P-2) suspended the petitioner No.l/student ditring the pendcncy ofenquuy in exercise of power under para 13(3) of the Ordinance No.7 issued under the Chliattisgarh Vishwa Vidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1973. It is submitted by leamed counsel for fhe petitioners that identical order has been issued ia case of other petitiDners also. Leamed counsel for the petitioners submits that keepiag in view the carcer of fhe petitioners/students, fhe enquuy be concluded expeditiously. Having heard, leamed cozinsel for the petitioners and haviug perused the docuinents appended to the petition, fhis Court is of the view fhat in the pubUc uiterest, it is desirable that the enquiry be coiapleted as expeditiously as possible, preferably wittun a period of six weeks, froin the date ofreceipt/production ofa copy ofthis order. For the reasons stated above, fhe inatters stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per Rules. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge