1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL WRIT No. 164 of 2007 MOHIT JOSHI V/S CENTRAL BOARD OF SEC. & ORS. Mr. NARPAT SINGH, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 15.2.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has been informed that the application was received in the Board on 1.12.2006 i.e. after expiry of the specified date. No material has been placed before me to show this allegation to be wrong, or to show that the application was received in the Board prior to 31.10.2006. The application of course has been filed by the petitioner requesting for summoning the original envelope from the Board. In my view, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, 226 jurisdiction is not required to be extended to the extent of making roving enquiry as contended by the petitioner. It is not the case of the petitioner in the writ petition that as a matter of fact the envelope was received prior to 31.10.2006, and the stand of the Board is wrong rather the case is that the petitioner had despatched the form on 21.10.2006, and from that alone the petitioner wants this Court to assume that 2 the form was received in time, and the communication Annexure-4 is sought to be interfered. In view of the above discussion, I do not find any sufficient ground to entertain the writ petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/