IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID THURSDAY, THE 16TH AUGUST 2007 / 25TH SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 13515 of 2007(H) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- HUSSAIN,S/O.PAKARUDEEN, SHYLA MANZIL,AZHIKODE P.O., KARAKULAM,ARUVIKKODU VILLAGE, NEDUMANGAD. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. SANIL P.S., S/O.SHARAGFUDEEN, LAILA MANZIL, KACHANI,TRIVANDRUM. 2. M.SALIM, ROADARIKATH HOUSE, PANAYAMUTTOM P.O., NEDUMANGAD,TRIVANDRUM. 3. M.K.SHAJAHAN, ROADARIKATH HOUSE, PANAYAMUTTOM P.O., NEDUMANGAD,TRIVANDRUM. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,VIDURA POLICE STATION,VIDURA. 5. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEDUMANGAD. BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.A.SALIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 13515/2007 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS, EXT.P1. COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE NO. J.C./S.A/1620 OF M/S. POURNAMI CHITTY FUNDS DT. 12/6/06. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO R4 DT. 19/3/07. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BY THE PETITIONER TO R5 DT. 26/3/2007. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL. True copy tga K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 13515 of 2007 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 16th day of August, 2007 JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioner has approached this court seeking protection in view of the threat to his life from respondents Nos.1 to 3. This court already granted an interim order directing respondents 4 and 5 to look into the representations Exts.P2 and P3 filed by him. 2. The learned Government Pleader submits that Ext.P3 is not received by the Sub Inspector. The learned counsel for the party respondents submits that the petitioner along with the 1st respondent obtained a licence for running a chitty and now the petitioner wants to run it by himself. That is the dispute between the petitioner and the party respondents. The learned counsel also submitted that they have no intention whatsoever to cause any physical harm to the petitioner. This submission is recorded. If there is any threat to his life from the above said respondents, the petitioner may move respondents 4 and 5. In that event, they will look into the same and take appropriate action according to law. The writ petition is disposed of as above. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR JUDGE HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE. mt/