CR No. 3114 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 3114 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.5.2011. Oriental Insurance Company Limited .......Petitioner Vs. Manoj Luthra and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... SABINA, J. Claimants have filed claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, claiming compensation on account of death of Rohit Luthra in a motor vehicle accident. During the pendency of the claim petition, an application was filed by the claimants for permission to re-examine PW-13 and PW-14 as the number of the offending truck had been wrongly typed as HR-37-B-2992 instead of HR-37-B-9229 in their affidavits. Vide the impugned order dated 7.3.2011, the said application was allowed by the tribunal. Hence, the present petition by the insurance company. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves dismissal. It appears that due to inadvertence, the number of the vehicle was typed as HR-37-B-2992 instead of CR No. 3114 of 2011 (O&M) -2- HR-37-B-9229, in the affidavits of PW-13 and PW-14 which were tendered in their examination in chief. Now the said witnesses will again appear for their re-examination and the insurance company will get the opportunity to cross examine the said witnesses. The proceedings before the tribunal are summary in nature. The application has been allowed by the tribunal by keeping in view the ends of justice and hence, calls for no interference. Dismissed. (SABINA) JUDGE May 10, 2011 Gurpreet