•^. ^ IN THE HIGH CQURT OF CHIMTTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITIONNO. 2-^^^ /2QQ3 Singls PETITIONER Jamna Prasad Sharma, S/o Late Sri Devi Prasad Sharma aged about 43yrs Occy. -Asst. Grade III, Present Address 1-1, C.G. M.S.M. Awasiya Parisar, Pension Bada, Raipur, Permanent Address - H.N. 106, Kailash Nagar, Semarakala Phase-II, Bhopal (M.P.) w' 1 ^* ...^y ^' .„ ,.^^ «•!?.J^ y^ ,<'?° "^" VERSUS ,eb RESPONDENTS ^- ^' ^^) F" ..v^ ^y^ '^ I ^>. '^-'•' 3. ^ •>"?.^'6>1i Union oflndia thorpugh ^ecretary Dept. Of Perspnnel & Training, Govt. OfbidiaNew Delhi Stateof Chhattisgarh through Secretary School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan R^ipur (C.G.) Secretary Chhattisgarh Higher Secondary Board D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) Secretary M.P. Higher Secondary Board Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) State of M..P. through Secretary School Education Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (C 'G) ^- WRTT J»ETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA W THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORAM, L..^-.-—.-.--(01) PABTI^UTAB&^n^* XI-HC-22 W^ST^T {^t^3TI^T rf^cT ^rw^ 3^'^TPTT^RT, ©Tfl'M'Ko,f°tdl'9^< 3i 1^1 451®h t..^^ ^ \ s ^i^C^i Sb^lCh ----------' ^py ^QO £<>' 3T^T ^cTTW 1Rf?cT 7-4-2005 On a mention being madel Mrs. Hamida Siddique, Mr. S.K. Beriwal, Seniol- respondentNo.1. Mr. Akhil Agrawal, respondent No.2. Mr. Shailendra Shukla. Heard. Th©case of the petitionet at Raipur m Chhattisgarh reorganisation of Uie State, he as his ehJJdren are studyjng at Tragedy. Leamed counsel for Uie the petjtioner he has been low paid employee it is difficult places, as such, in the interest| make a representation to the Secondary Board and also the which learned counset for the re^F The Jimrted prayer made to be genuine, fair and make a representation to Secondary Board and Madhya| within a period of 15 days from the petitioner the respondents ajloc4ted reason^ible chi^f^<J1Ti Hi^*^te^t<f^<(-<i< ^^rf^rw^T tiie case is taken up for hearing. co|yns@J for the petitioner. Panei Counsel for the Union of India/ Pan^l Lawyer for the State of Chhattisgarh/ co|unsel for respondents No.3 to 5. is ttiat he is working as Asststant Grade-111 Higtier Secondary Board, and at <he time of ^ave optton for the State of Madhya Pradesh Qhopaj and his fsamily is victjm ofBhopai Gas j>etjtioner submits Uiat ignoring the option of to the State of Chhattisgarh, and being a for the petitioner to maintain his famiiy at tm> of justice, ttie petitioner may be allowed to Ur(ion of India tfirough ttie Chhattisgarh Higher Wadhya Pradesh Higher Secondary Board, to re^pondents have no objection. ^y learned counsel for the ptetitioner appears Therefore, the petHioner is allowed to respo^dent No.1 through the Chhattisgarh Higher IPradesh Higher Secondary B<^ird, Bhopal, ^oday, and on receiving the representation of |vjz., both the Boards after considering the ___M^fid.^- XI-HC-22 W^T^T {^:lt^3TI^T ^Rt^^f?cT ^)^|cb<T Soma 3^ •^i^Kn'4, t?Ti1-M<i<s, Rtdlti^< 311^1 M5|cb 60^ *ilN^T^Wra? f^^[ 200^ ^(^ 3T^fT?^T3EK^f?(T 's-- representation of the petitioner representation from ttie petjtioner) <tiNl<vi41'i ^i^<nT^fe^<Ri^j< ^>3:rf^T3TI^T ^hall forward ^ieir vjev^/comments to the Union of India withtn tfiree rhonths from the date of receipt of the and in turn, the Union of India shail decide the same within a period of anofher six months thereof, in accordance with law. With the direction aforesaj<|, the petition stands disposed of. Parties are entitled forcertjped copy ofthls order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge