HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : EELASF’UR \ WRH’ IPETWCN (T) N3. 4486 {3F 2039 PETITIONER 1 ‘ Kama} Sing , 36 yrs., Sic Malkét.3ingh,‘ Pandr§, Bul -Stand, Ravi Nagar, Shuk!a Colany, Raspur, by generai attorney Akashdeep Gm, 20 yrs., S/o Lakhwant Singh Giii, Mahendra Traveis. Fandri, Raipur. Versus ‘ REEPONDEN‘ras 1. Taxatien Author§ty cum Regicnal Transport dfficer, Raipur. 2. M15 Kankér Roadways thra' Prep. Preetam Singh Gamhé,’ Near Gandhé Udyaan‘ CM} Lines, Ra§pur. (whit petition under Articie 226 of the Constiiuiion of india) Singie Bench :‘Hon’bie Shri $atish K. Agnihotri, J. Presem :- Shri Raia Shamra, counsei for the petitidner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. GRDER ORAL (Passeci on this 17.‘ day of August, 2909} Leamed counsel “appeai'ing for the petitioner submits that the appiication dated 13-5-2009 (Annexuie - W5) fiied by the peiiiionei‘ is peading consideration befare the Regionai Transport Authority and Taxation Authoriiy, Raipur and ever since no action hae been taken on the said appiication. Shri Sao, teamed Govt. Advocate appearing for the $tate, submits that the peneiing appiication of the petitioner would be considered and decided, in accordance with law ané on its own merits, with'm a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thie order. in View of foregoing, according to the learned counsei appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for ae‘iudication. Sdr— .. - tlsh K.’Aghih0tri ~ Judge Gown ' a ‘ Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of ‘