... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.839 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.839 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.839 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1238 OF 2004 Maruti Mahipat Jathar ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Shri P.V. Samant for the Applicant. Shri U.V. Nikam, A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : AUGUST 19, 2006. : AUGUST 19, 2006. : AUGUST 19, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocates appearing for the parties. The Appeal was dismissed for default. As a result, bail granted in favour of the Appellant stood cancelled. The Appeal has been restored. Therefore, the Applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 2. Hence, Application is disposed of by passing following order: (i) The Applicant be enlarged on bail on the terms and conditions incorporated in order dated 17th December, 2004 in Criminal Application No.5699 of 2004 and order dated 18th October, 2005 in Criminal Application No.6070 of 2005 subject to ... 2 ... the Applicant filing fresh bonds within period of two weeks from today. (ii) Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE