IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ELIPE DHARMA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 7811 of 2001 Between: V.J.Vision Media Pvt. Ltd., Rep., by its Managing Partner, Venkateshwarlu, R/o. Srikakulam, Srikakulam District, Internet Cable Net Work, (H.O.) Banglore, D.No.7-6-38, Yenugumahal Street, Srikakulam-532001, ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Municipal Commissioner, Srikakulam Municipality, Srikakkulam District. 2 M/S.J.K.Communication (Siti Cable Net Work) rep., by its Partner M.Sridhar, G.T.Road, Srikakulam. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ order or direction more particular one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the action of the respondent in rejecting permission sought by the petitioner for erecting the poles of establishing the cable net work System as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the Respondent to permit the petitioner to erect the poles for establishing Cable net work system. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. G.RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. S.NAGESWARA REDDY The Court, at the stage of admission, made the following : ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ______________________ (DHARMA RAO ELIPE,J) 20th July, 2005. tsy To 1 The Municipal Commissioner, Srikakulam Municipality, Srikakkulam District. 2 Two CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JPK}