IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2011 / 2ND POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 34833 of 2011(D) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- ROHIT GOPAKUMAR S/O GOPAKUMAR T.A. AGED 22 YEARS, KRISHNA KRIPA ELIYODAN PARAMBU NELLIKODE P.O., CALICUTT -16. BY ADV. SRI.E.NARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., PIN - 673 636. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PIN - 673 636. BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHER, SC FOR UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SD WPC NO. 34833/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION OF ANSWER PAPERS OF THE B Tech FIFTH SEMESTER EXAMINATION 12/2010 P2 COPY OF the CHALAN RECEIPT DATED 04.12.2011 FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE FEE FOR REVALUATION RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE SD ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).34833/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioner applied for revaluation of two papers in the 5th semester B.Tech Examination vide Ext.P1 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. 4.Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs