IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1219 of 2007 1. KRISHNA NAND JHA @ KANHAIYA JHA, SON OF GOPAL JEE JHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-LABANI, P.S. BAHERA, DISTRICT-DARBHANGA. …………………………………(DEFENDANT 2ND PARTY). 2. YOGI YADAV @ JOGI. 3. BINDESHWAR YADAV. BOTH SON OF LATE JAGESHWAR YADAV. RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-JARSOCHAKARSEN TOLA TIRMUHANI, P.S. BAHERA, DISTRICT-DARBHANGA. ………………………………(DEFENDANT IST PARTY) …………………………………………….PETITIONERS. Versus UMA KANT PODDAR, SON OF LATE KANCHI PODDAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-TRIMUHANI, P.S. BAHERA, DISTRICT-DARBHANGA. ……………………………PLAINTIFF..OPPOSITE PARTY. --------- 3. 18.2.2010. After some argument, Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw this Civil Revision to raise the issues involved in this Civil Revision as ground in appeal, if the suit concerned is decided against the petitioners and if any appeal is preferred against such decree, in view of the provisions as contained in Order XLIII Rule 1 of the C.P.C. In the above view of the matter, this Civil Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)