CR No. 6782 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 6782 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 04.03.2011 Hansa ....Petitioner Vs. Anubhav Nagar and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present:- Mr. S.K. Panwar, Advocate, for the petitioner. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) This petition assails the order dated 11.03.2010 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Faridabad, and order dated 05.08.2010 (Annexure P-2) passed by the Appellate Court, dismissing the application of the plaintiff- petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'the petitioner') under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC restraining the defendants-respondents (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondents') from dispossessing them from the suit land. The case of the petitioner is that he had agreed to sell his land and had signed the typed sale deed (which was registered by the Sub Registrar). However, he has stated that he never appeared before the Sub Registrar for registration of the sale deed on 10.10.1996; received the sale consideration or parted with the possession as alleged by the respondents. Thus, the petitioner has sought injunction against the respondents, while claiming possession over the suit property. CR No. 6782 of 2010 2 Having scrutinized the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, no such infirmity or perversity has been detected suggesting interference by this Court. It would be pertinent to mention here that the sale deed dated 10.10.1996, which the petitioner says that he never got registered, is a registered document and it contains a recital that the petitioner as well as respondent No.3 had delivered the possession of the suit land to respondent No.1. There is a clear endorsement at the back of the sale deed indicating that a sum of Rs.80,000/- was given by respondent No.1 to the petitioner and defendant No.3. At the same time, the petitioner has failed to prove on record any document in order to prove his possession over the demised premises. Resultantly, finding no merit in the petition, the same is hereby dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) 04th of March, 2011 JUDGE ajp