1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 11 OF 2009 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1187 OF 2008 Gopal Bharatkumar Mehta ... Petitioner v/s Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai ... Respondent Mr.P.M.Havnur i/by D.M.Shah for the petitioner. Smt.K.K.Soraan for the Corporation. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 7TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C.: 1. It appears that the order dated 5.11.2009 indicates that the statement of the learned advocate for the Corporation that the written statement has already been filed in the suit, was accepted. However, the roznama reflects that the written statement has not been filed. 2. Therefore, review petition allowed only to the extent that the order dated 5.11.2009 is modified by directing the 2 Corporation to file its written statement within two weeks from today. 3. The learned advocate for the applicant states that since the regularization application has been filed after the order dated 5.11.2009, this Court should grant the review petition. In my opinion, the review petition cannot be granted since it is based on events which have occurred subsequent to the order passed. ..... 3