FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.62 OF 2008 Shivaji R. Patil and ors. Vs. Shalan V. Patil and ors. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders. of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.P.D.Dalvi for the Appellants. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 02nd June, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Advocate for the Appellant. It is sought to be contended that the suit property was not the property of the father. Both the courts have concurrently held that the suit property was the property of the father and the daughters have share in it. In this view of the matter, there is no substantial question of law in the appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.)