^" BB|I» Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE (Q N0. ^l ^| / 2011 APPLICANTS/ PETITIONERS 5. >-" 7. Sarju Gupta Son oflate Meva Lal, aged about 36 years, Occupation Chicken Seller, R/o. Mayapur, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.), Santosh Gupta Son of late Meva Lal, aged about 26 years, Occupation Chicken Seller, R/o. Mayapur, Ainbikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). Shivnath Gupta Son of Jhuri Sao, aged 50 years, Thanganpara, Ainbikapur, Tah. and District Surguja (C.G.), Rajesh Soni, son of Baijnath Soni, aged about 45 years, Mayapur, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.), Mohd. Ghulam Mustafa, Son of Mohd. Sainsuddin, aged 62 years, Occupation Moininpura Ambikapur, (C.G.), Munawar Kainruddin Mutton Seller, (Parradand), District Surguja Qurashi, Son of Qiirashi, aged 45 yeas, R/o. Mamapur, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.), Mohd. Jabbar Qurashi, S/o Mohd. Siddique Qurashi, aged 60 years, R/o. Mamapur, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.), Anwar Qurashi S/o Sohrab Qurashi, aged 35 years, R/o. Mamapur, Anabikapur, District Surguja (C.G.), VERSUS ^ RESPONDENT •^ D.N. Kashyap, aged about 45 years, (Son of not known to the petitioner), Conunissioner, Municipal Corporation, Ainbikapur, District Surguja (C.G.), CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT FOR INITIATING OF CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE RESPONDENT FOR WII^*UL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 01^07-2011. PASSED INW.PJQ N0^317/2011. -HC—78 *II*ICTI (b*(r^» ^s[ r<ii^i<n^, ^ti1-H<i(o, 'f^Tray ^...fc?..^?,^^/;; ^200 ^Ti^r TT^F (ltcii^<Bi<^) ^R^T^T Ri'iicb "WT ^ll^l 9n*l|cb ^nwTrf^ra^T SB : Hon'bie Shri ivianindra ivlohar Shri Bhupendra Singh, cou No.217/2011. °bi^<n<fli 'HTR^ff ^* f^^it <Fai^i< ^T 3rff?R 3T?^?T Shrivastava, J. 15-07-2011 Smt. Hamida Siddiqui, coui|isei for the petitioner in contempt case (C) No.214/2011. The aforesaid two contem common order. in a writ petition fiied by the an interim order was passed on respect of the shop in question ii be maintained tisi the next date Case (C) No.214/2011 atiege tr 'i shops in Gudari Bazar and after been removed and the Corporatic in contempt petition No.21' a case for initiating contempt proj submission that the writ petitione( Drive and on 1 /7/201 1 they v</ere the interim order was passed, th^ Therefore; there is violation of int| regard, notices were aiso sent toj shift their shops to Marin Drive. isel forthe petitloner in contempt case (C) pt petitions are being disposed off by this Ipetitioners In contempt petition No.214/11 , 1/7/2011, directing that the status quo m ^ the petition, as obtains on that day, shai! of hearin.g. The petitioners in Contempt at on 1/07/2011, they were running their the interim order was passed; they have n has iocked the shops. ?/2011, the Corporation has come out with ;eedjngs against the writ petitioners on the s have already shirted their shops to Marin 'unning thelr shops in Marln Drive and after y shifted their shops back to Gudari Bazar. srim order passed by this Court and in that :he contemnors on 6/7/11 and 8/07/2011 to '•^^ ,^.^ 'fts^^-. 1 tite^^^fXI-HG—78 *11*1<MI <t»NT^ '3^[ ^l^lcn^, ^Tl|<H4|(o, f^^l^^< ^......C^.:....^.f...CQ...^-^lr ^l ^?r Tr5w (1tlG(t35T^r) 3TT^T '^FT f<^i<sh ^T^T 3H^T9TON' I—- Deepi; /^- '^nw^Tf^^i^T ^' GM^(<n<fli ^i^cnT^ fs^l <p3i^« ^" ^jRw a?n^?T Considering that in thewri|t petition, interim order has been passed on 1/7/2011 and the Corporation llias not yet flied its repiy in the matter, at present, 1 am not inciined to ertitertaln these twocontempt petltions. The petltioners (both in the contempt| appiication in the pending writ ^etitions. The parties are however granted iiberty to revive their contempt pi case (c) No.214/2011 and con] finally disposed off. petitions) are at ilberty to move appropriate stitlons, If exigency so arises. The contempt |empt case (c) No.217/2011 are therefore Sd/- Manindra IVIohan Shrivastava Judge