1 Kambli IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.232 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3249 OF 2011 ... Shri Vijay Ramrao Pawar ...Appellant v/s. Saraswati Shikshan Sanstha and ors. ...Respondents ... Mr.A.M.Joshi for the Appellant. Mr.M.S.Lagu for Respondents Nos. 1 & 2. ... CORAM: D.K.Deshmukh & Anoop V. Mohta, JJ DATED: 25th August, 2011 P.C.: By the order impugned in the appeal the learned single Judge has permitted the Respondent in an appeal before the School Tribunal to amend the written statement. Only additional ground of defence is being raised by the amendment. 2. In our opinion, the learned single Judge was justified in allowing the amendment. It is always open to the Appellant to 2 argue against the ground at the final hearing of the Appeal. The Appeal is, therefore, rejected. (Anoop V. Mohta, J.) (D.K.Deshmukh, J.)