/y HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT B1LASPUR Sinaie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Diiip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Petitioners Respondent Contemnor Cont. Case No. 312 of 2008 1. Shri Rawatpura Sarkar Institute of Pharmacy, through its Principat, Rawatpura Sarkar Institute of Pharmacy behind Holiday Resort, village Chorha, Kumhari, Dtstt. Durg, (Chhattisgarh) earlier know as Shri Rawatpura Sarkar tnternationat institute, Department of Pharmacy, Kumhari, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh). 2. Shri Rawatpura Sarkar Lok Kalyan Trust, through its Managing Trustee, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar Lok Kaiyan Tmst, Holiday Resort, villaga Chorha, Kumhari, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) Versys Prakash Dubey, Registrar, Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University, Bhilai, Durg, (Chhattisgarh) Contemot petition under Article 215 of the Constitution of (ndia read wi$h Section 10 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1961. Present : Shri Sanjay K. ^rawal, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, counsel for the respondentteontemnor ORAL ORDER (Passed on 21" July, 2)09) Heard on admission. 2. This contempt petition arises out of an order dated 26.09.2008 passed in W.P.(C) No. 5410/2008 whereby on a submission made by the counsel for the Contemnor herein thatthe application and representationofthe petitioners shall be considered in accordance with law, on its merits, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order dated 26.09.2008, the said petition was disposed of. 3. Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, learned counset for the petitioners does not deny that as per Annexure C/4 a letter has been sent to the petttioner by the T~ Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University whereby an assurance n was given that the application of the petifioners will be considered as per the Statute of CSVTU. He does not a!so deny <ftat the petitioners have already fiied W.P.(C) N0.962/20TO for seeking a writ of mandamus and commanding the contemnor herein that affiliation be granted to the pentioners for the M.Pharm Course. 4. In view of the above, nothing survives in this petition, which is accordingly disposed of at the admission stage. fs-^l^ Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge