l^^^t.;^ ^^ ^ W^T^Tf^NF Tf^Tl ^IT^YiF^NT' ^ '3^ ^mRW, ^Tfi^iji<o, f^rey *<i*»CTf'^iN? "^200 'W^T ^R^ ( ^I^^^) ^RH^R W^T 3?T^? ^pfemh -m^f ^ fe^ Tf^?R '^3tJW3??t^T Sinole Bench; Hon'by W.P. Petitioner (Petition U//\ 2^ Paraj aboul Highj Rajn<| Vs Respondents Present: tioner. Mr. K.S. Pawar, Adv. for the peti| Ms. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer foif the State Mr. Justice Dhirendra_Mishra) Fsl No.468/09 6 of Constitution of India) ;ram 6upta, S/o Shri Ganga Prasad 6upta, Aged [ 61 years, Upper Division Teacher, Government sr Secondary School, Musra, District indgaon (C.G.) 1. ^tate of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, qducation Deportment, &.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. J(oint Director, Treasury, Account & Pension, FjajnandgQon (C.G). 3. t|istrict Treasury Officer, Rajnandgaon, District l^ajnandgaon (C.6.) 4. tjistrict Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District- l^ajnandgaon (C.6.) 5. P|"incipal/Government High Secondary School, Ajlusra, t)istrict Rajnandgaon (C.6.) 27.01.2009 Heard. The petitioner has filed "(his petition being aggrieved by the order of Annexure P-1 dated 16.1.200^ passed by respondent No.5 herein. Learned counsel for the going to retire on 31.1.2009, ho| contemplating recovery of Rs.l6| been paid in excess of his entitl^ petitioner submits that the petitioner is vever, he has been served with an order 418-/- on the pretext that the same has ment. ?^ :-?^HC—78 arf^l ^ ^it^ ??^[W^T'sFRW -/ -^551: ^H|d<4, ^StllwKo, fST<r(l-y^< NIHCTE »»Hf€(» '^200^ 3n^r ^?^ ('^3^?) 'P^?T'^fei ^^ -2-- tKe responcjlent ahd Learned counsel for impugned is per-se contrary to giving opportunity of hearing to this petition may be disposed o| representation before responde^it this petition qnd in turn, within the specified period. Ms. 6hai, learned panel that in case the petitioner filesj the same shall be considered period of three weeks from the In view of the above, th| the petitioner to make detailejd today, along with this petitio|ri respondent No.2 raising all the ^ri representation being made, re5 accordance with law within a p^r receipt of representation. I| representation is decided by reif .from the petitioner pursuant to Consequently, I.A. No.l, aj Certified copy as per rulejs. petitioner submits that the order aw as the same has been passed without ^he petitioner. However/he submits that with a liberty to the petitioner to file No.2 raising all the grievances raised in No.2 be directed to decide the same ^wfeNN 'RW^ff ^f f^^ Tf^f^K ^^RRW^T (awyer appean'ng for the State submits representation before respondent No.2, decided by respondent No.2 within a |iate of receipt of representation. js petition is disposed of with liberty to representation within ten days from & certified copy of this order, to 'ievances, raised in this petition. On such jpondent No.2 shall decide the same in ^riod of three weeks from the date of is further directed that till the pondent No.2, no recovery shall be made irder of Annexure P-1 dated 16.1.2009. jso stands disposed of. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge ^