IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 27TH MAY 2011 / 6TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 14260 of 2011(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHIRLY DANIEL, W/O.ROBERT MATHEW, JAISON VILLA, KOLLAKADAVU, CHENGANNUR FROM CHAWEKAYIL, CHERIYANADU, KOLLAKADAVU, CHENGANNUR (UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, APNM CMS UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, KULATHUPUZHA). BY ADV. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND SRI.T.NIKLAVU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATIONAL DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695001. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PATHANAMTHITTA AT THIRUVALLA. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVALLA. 5. THE CORPORATE MANAGER, CMS SCHOOLS, DIOCESE OF MADHYA KERALA DIOCESAN OFFICE, BISHOP GIL MEMORIAL BUILDING, CATHEDRAL ROAD, KOTTAYAM. R1 TO R4 BY G.P. SMT. RANI DIOTHIMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 14260 of 2011-F - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 27th day of May, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner is working as Upper Primary School Assistant in one of the schools managed by the fifth respondent. The matter of dispute is regarding the non approval of appointment of the petitioner as LPSA. It appears that the approval was declined for the reason that the school was an uneconomic school. The petitioner is relying upon various Government Orders. 2. Ext.P5 is a revision petition filed by the Manager before the Director of Public Instruction as early as on 9.2.2010. The petitioner has also moved the Director of Public Instruction by filing Ext.P7 revision petition. 3. There will be a direction to the second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P5 revision petition filed by the Manager along with Ext.P7 revision petition filed by the petitioner, after hearing the petitioner and the Manager, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy wpc 14260/2011 2 of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the second respondent for compliance. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/