W.P(C) No.1021/2003 Page 1 of 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P(C) No.1021/2003 % Date of Decision: 20.02.2009 Satvir Singh …. Petitioner Through Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate. Versus Krishna Bus Service (P) Ltd …. Respondents Through Mr.K.C.Mittal, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR 1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? YES 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NO ANIL KUMAR, J. * This writ petition has been listed for rehearing as the parties contended that in another writ petition being W.P(C) No.3275/2001 between the parties which was dismissed, pursuant to an order of the Division Bench, a review application has been filed which is pending and WP(C) 3275 of 2001, a settlement has been arrived at between the parties, pursuant to which this writ petition can also be disposed off. Consequently the present writ petition is taken up for hearing. This is a writ petition seeking quashing of award dated 31st January, 2002 and seeking direction to the respondent management to reinstate the petitioner back on duty with continuity of services. W.P(C) No.1021/2003 Page 2 of 3 The petitioner has agreed to take a total sum of Rs.60,000 in full and final settlement of all his claims from the respondent. Mr.Manjeet Singh, Director of the respondent No.1, M/s.Krishna Bus Service Pvt Ltd is present and he has tendered an amount of Rs.30,000/- in cash out of Rs.60,000/- settled with the petitioner. The amount has been paid to the petitioner in the presence of the counsel who has satisfied himself with the amount given to him. This amount has been paid out of Rs.60,000/- settled by the petitioner with the respondent No.1 in settlement of all his claims for back wages and in lieu of his reinstatement in his services and all the claims on account of overtime, leave and bonus and all the claims raised by the petitioner in his application under Section 33 C(2) of Industrial disputes Act. The parties have also agreed that after receipt of this amount of Rs.60,000/- out of which Rs.30,000/- has been paid today in the Court and another amount of Rs.30,000/- is lying deposited which was deposited by the respondent No.1 in the writ petition No.3275/2001, which the petitioner shall be entitled to withdraw, no claim of the petitioner against the respondent shall survive. This has been specifically agreed that after receipt of this amount of Rs.60,000/- no claim either under Section 33 C(2) as claimed in writ petition No.3275/2001 or any amount on any account shall be due from the respondent No.1 to the petitioner. W.P(C) No.1021/2003 Page 3 of 3 Since the parties have compromised a part of the amount has been paid and another part which is lying deposited in this Court which the petitioner shall be entitled to withdraw, no further orders are required and the writ petition is, therefore, disposed of accordingly. FEBRUARY 20, 2009 ANIL KUMAR, J. “k”