SftiGt.EBJENCff IN THEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(227)NO. S^\ OF 2010 PET1TIONER ^ , .s.e.--^'vy''W^~ >»••'/Rft-lC-,^,l ^•••' ^^' '^^' RESPONDENTS (Claimants before the Claims Tribunal) VERSUS 1< 2: Sri Ram General Insurance Company Ltd. Corporate Office E8 EPIP, R IICO, Industrial Area, Sitapur, Jaipur - 302 022, Rajasthan, Through Its Manager, Authorized Officer on behalf of the Sri Ram General Insurance Company Ltd. Smt. Jamuna Sinha, Wd/o Late Tijau Ram, Aged about 40 years, Rupendra Kumar Sinha, S/o Late Tijauram, Aged about 19 years, •-'SK Driver of the offending vehicle. Owner of the Vehicle. Formal respondent, said to be financer of tractor causjng accident belonging to respondent No.5. 3. ^ Smt. Manki Bai, Wd/o Somnath Sinha, Aged about 70 years, All the respondents No. 1 to 3 are R/o Village Jhajharkheda, Tahsil Magarload, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) /^" — 4.' Rajkumar Nishad, S/o Bandhyram Nishad, Aged about 32 years, R/o Village & Post Borsi, Police Station and Tahsil Magarload, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) 5. ' Hincharam Dhruv, S/o Raisingh Gond, Aged about 55 years, R/o Village Bhaluchua, Post Borsi, Tahsil Magarload, Distt. / Dhamtari (CG) 6. Manager, ICICI Bank Ltd. Kachhari Chowk, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur(CG) fc °? PETITION UNDERARTICLE227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA N •/\ \^ Petitioner ResDondents HiGWSOURTORCHHATTtSOARH^TBlLASPUR A ^l^Pe cma^)^^^^2MO y^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Sri Rwi General Insurance Company -Ltd., :.; . :.;,-- ;.^.;,, ..:.,.^.--:^-^ Vefsus Smfc^amunaSirihaandothers <WritPe ionynderArtiGle227ofttieConstitutfonoflndja) (SB: Hbn'bteMr.T.P.Shanna.J.) Present:- ;, • : ^::::;.'1:.:;-..:;;,::, • :.1: :.: ..:,: : •,';• ;-..-.i,.:..'.^»^ f; MrAbhishekhSjRhawithMr,GhanshyamPatel,counsetf6r^&^ NohepreserrtforresporKJenteNo.'tto3. Mr.P.P.Sahu.counsel ft>r respondents No^t and 5. Mr.J.SP. Chandrasen, counselfer resppndentNoA ORALOiRDBl {Passedon6a'August,201B) 1. Heard. 2. I have perused the oreler dateel 30,3.2Q'(Q passed byflie Chief, Mofor AccKtont ClaimsTril^nal(ft>rtshortWeTribunal^,DhamtariinCiaim©aseNo^^ whereby leamed Tnbunat hasdismissedthe appUcation fi under OrderS Ruie 17 ofttie C.P.C. foramenclment fn writtenstatement oh the ground ofmalafide. 3. The petiUoiner has n<rt taken irwwnsistent defence by amerri^ ^^ment arKi only^ftasttiedto s)qal^ closjng ^the evideiwe of the pa^ opportunity of hearing to the p^es, the Tribunal was under^ allowed ttie application, niaytaesubjectto cost. 4. Consiequentiy, the petition is atlowed. pixtor impugned is hereby sst adde. ApplK^^nforaroendmentjnwriltenstatementfiledont^ alsoattow®cl,suyeettocostofRs.1000^pa^teletorespondeiW ctaimantswithm45daysfromtoday.0pposjtepartymaym^ alnendment. No order as to eosts. T.P.Sharma t Judge £-'/V ^ • .^—-' / /- ^ 6 & ^ ^ " RK;^ K¥-'s ^^5 KS Ei^% >^;:;?: