IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.3985 of 2008 Decided on : 06.01.2010 Gurdeep Singh & another ... Appellants versus Harjinder Singh etc. ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. R.K.Singla, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. B.D.Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1. **** 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This appeal has been filed against the judgment of the ld. Lower Appellate Court reversing that of the Trial Court and thereby dismissing the suit of the appellant-plaintiff for eviction of the respondent No.1 from the shop in dispute (which is admittedly situated in a rural area). After arguing for some time, parties have agreed that respondent No.1 shall continue to be in possession of the property in dispute till 31.03.2011 and that he would not be liable to pay any further rent/damage till the said date. RSA No.3985 of 2008 -2- Statement/undertaking of the parties in this regard have been recorded separately. In view thereof this appeal is allowed in the above-said terms. Since the main case has been decided, all the pending civil miscellaneous applications, if any stand disposed of. January 06, 2010 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE