RSA No.1571 of 2008 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. R.S.A. No. 1571 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12 - 7 - 2011 Satpal and others ....Appellants v. Shardha Nand and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA *** Present: Mr.Vijay Kumar Jindal, Advocate for the appellants. Mr.Rajinder Chhokar, Advocate for respondent No.1. *** KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) In CM No.2708-C of 2011 In this application notice was issued to the respondents. Mr.Rajinder Chhokar, Advocate has caused appearance for respondent No.1 and stated that he has no objection in case the present application is allowed and RSA No.1571 of 2008 is allowed in terms of compromise deed dated 16.2.2011, Annexure `A1', to which this Court has assigned as Ex.A1. C.M. is allowed as prayed for. RSA No.1571 of 2008 Mr.Vijay Kumar Jindal, learned counsel appearing for the RSA No.1571 of 2008 (O&M) [2] plaintiff-appellants states that he will not press any claim against defendant- respondents No.2 to 7 in the suit filed by him. Mr.Jindal further states that respondents No.2 to 7 had already admitted the claim of the appellants, therefore, they are not necessary for adjudication of the present appeal. This Court had already taken on record compromise deed dated 16.2.2011, Annexure `A1' and assigned Ex.A1. Statement of defendant- respondent No.1 to the suit has been recorded separately. Mr.Chhokar, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1- Shardha Nand has stated that present appeal be allowed in terms of compromise deed Ex.A1. Consequently, the present appeal is allowed in terms of compromise deed dated 16.2.2011, Annexure `A1' to which this Court has assigned Ex.A1. It be read as a part of this order. Since Mr.Jindal, learned counsel for the appellants has stated that respondents No.2 to 7 be deleted from the array of parties, decree be drawn qua respondent No.1 only. ( KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA ) July 12, 2011. JUDGE RC