:I^A^:' c 'i-lB?- c ^ Bl HIOMGOURTOFtMHATTOOARHAtBILftSPUR E51VISlGNBiNC?H 1 Coram HONWE^HI^R^JlliV<NyP'TA»C^.& HON'BI..ESHRlSVNll.KUIVIARSINMA,J. M.A.No.1041of2(»04 APPELLANT NON-APPl-IG^NTS RESPGNbENfS .Shanke^^am;<^N:eta^^l:^S/o^ Rarn^nd^agedaboutSS^ars^ Teacher, PS & ^ Chi.treha Colliery. District-Koriya .(CG)''1;,^.;.:1'.;\...':1.'' VERSUS 1 Smt MuhnibaJ, W/o Late Matuk^hariPaniRa,ag@40y^ire 2 Ram Kumar, S/o late R4atul<c iari Panika.agelSyears 3 Raj Kumari, D/o Late M^tukdhari Panjka, age 10 yeang (Mlnor) through her Mother (Guardian) IVIunniBAI All resident of Village Chi.ircha Cojliery Maharan?i Pratap COIony, PS & Tahsil - BaiKuntHpur, District —Koriya(GG) 4 Fulkuwar, D/o Late M Panika, & Raghava Ram, ^ about 32 ywEA, e/0 Village Sirsi, PS & Tahsil ~ Surajpur, District - Surguja(CG) 5 The United India Insyrjance Company Priyate l-imit|d, BranGh, Near Ram Mandir af Ambjkapur, Distt-Surguja(CG) API:>EAI-U/S1730FM<:yTORVEHIGLEACT.4988 Present: Shn Neeraj Mehta leanied counsel for tMe appetlant. ORDER (1?mDecember,2008) t -; I'c ll^! M: c m' z subbu Th6 following order 6f the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: Shri Neeraj Mehta, learned counsel fbr the appellant, In view of the fact that the appettant is not r^ponding to his communication for sending the receipt of the mandatory deposit under Section 173 ofthe Motor Vehicles Act.seeks permission to wjthdraw the appeal filed by the appellant, owner of the offending yehicle, against the award dated 24.06.2004, passed in Motor Claim Case No.13/2003, with liberty of tiling another appeal against the impugned award as andwhen the deposit receipt is madeavailablebytheappellant. 2) Perrnisslon granted. 3) With the above liberty, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4) Registry is directed to retum the certifled copy of the award to learned counsel for the appellant. SdA ChiefJustice Sd/- Sunil Kumarsinha Judge ^ r"