HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Review Petition No.56/2007 Singte Bench: Hon'ble Shri Di!ip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. ^) PetitiQners Piaintiffs Respondenfs 2. 3. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Devi Prasad Bajpai, S/o Savitanath Bajpal, Aged 56 years. Durga Prasad Bajpai, S/o Savitanath Bajpai, Aged 54 years Jagdish Prasad Bajpai, S/o Savitanath Bajpai, Aged 50 years. (Ali residents of Subhash Nagar, Bilaspur, MP, Now Chhattlsgarh) Versus Mus. Vetwati, Aged 70 years, W/o Narsingh Prasad, R/o Bhagwati Nager Mallava, District Hardoi, (UP) Rajendra Kumar Shuk!a, Aged 36 years, S/o Shiv Datt Shukla, R/o 102, Praphulia Kumar Shukla, Aged 35 years, S/o Shiv Datt Shukla, R/o 104/302, Shishamau, Bada Chowraha, Kanpur Narendra Kumar Shukla, Aged 33 years, S/o Shiv Datt Shukla, R/o 104/302 Shishamau, Bada Chowraha, Kanpur, 11. 12. 13. Akhilesh Kumar Bajpayee, Aged 30 years, S/o Gaya Prasad Bajpayee, Tilak Nagar, Biiaspur (MP now Chhattisgarh) Simalesh Bajpayee, Aged 22 years, S/o Gaya Prasad Bajpayee, R/o Tilak Nagar, Bilaspur (W now Chhattisgarh) Anj'ana Bajpayee, Aged 29 years, D/o Gaya Prasad Pandey. Ranjana Pandey, Aged 28 years, D/o Gaya Prasad Bajpayee. Nirupama Bajpayee, Aged 27 years, D/o Gaya Prasad Bajpayee. Vandana Bajpayee, Aged 26 years, D/o Gaya Prasad Bajpayee. Anupana Vajpayee, Aged 24 years; D/o Gaya Prasad Bajpayee. (SI.No.7 to 11 all residents of Tiiak Nagar, Bilaspur, MP now Chhattisgarh) Jaya Prakash Pandey, Aged 32 years, S/o Narayan Prasad Pandey. Shriprakash Pandey, Aged 29 years, S/o Narayan Prasad Pandey. Vijay Prakash Pande, Aged 25 years, S/o Narayan Prasad Pandey. (Ail -three residents pf Chitragupganj, Behind,TelisilandDistrictSt>ind,M13) 15. Umesh Bajpayee, Aged 60 yeare,S/o Kedamath Pandey, TilakNagar, Bilaspur; MP now Chhattisgarh.q 16. Smt. Uma Mishra, Aged;55 years VWb SidhnathMishra, Threugh Viyek'Mishra,; :l.l.HardOi:UP. .;.:/^, .'•;;•;.^ ADolication under Order XLVII Rule 1 Read_wi i Section 151 of the Gode^oT Civll Pro<sedure,^'t908 for rev!ewo£0!al>ludgment,dated%07.M07 iMssed; in Flrst Appeal No.219/1997 Present:- : . : .': .^': i' \. ' '' - •'^ 1 Shri RanbirSingft Marhas, counsel forthe petitioners. €• ' .:. ; ' : :; OR»LORDER : " . (Passedon 10tbSeptember, 2007) | y Heard., : : ' . • : ' , ! ' '.: : : 1 '.11 No such illegality or manifest error apparent on the face of record as woyld justi^ review ofthe impugned judgment dated25.07.2007 is pointed outbytheleamedcounselfbrthepetitioner. Accordingly,ReviewRetitionisdismissed_____——~—'', ,J Sd/- ..i.1F '~~"'~<^"' DUiyRaosahebDeshinukhl Judge [ "k!