HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Mm DIV:ON BENCH 5! CORAM : HON’BLE MR. S.R.NAYAK, C.J. AND HGN’BLE MR. SAT!SH K. AGNiHQTRl, J. WRIT PETITION NO.1547 OF 2001 Petitioners : 1. M/s Swastik Wires a partnership firm. duly registered under the releva‘qt’é provisions of the Partnership Ai’ 1932 having its principai piece of business at Bhanpuri industrial Area, Raipur C.G. A.L.Agrawai son of Shri B.L.Agrawal, Adult, partner M/s Swastik Wires. resident of Near Kankali Talab, Raipur CrGr Vei’SUS Resgondents : i. The State of Chhattisgarh threugh the Collector, Raipur 2t The inspector General of Registration and Superintendent of Stamps, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, presently working at Gwalior 3r The District Registrar and Coliector of Stamps, Raipur 4. Bank of Baroda. a body corporate having common seal and perpetual succession having inter alia amongst other branches a branch at K.K.Road, Raipur C.G. WRIT PETiTiON N0.1990 0i: 2aoa Petitioner M/s Kripal Springs (indie) Ltd, a company duiy incorporated under the relevant provision provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 having its principles piace of business at Main g XI—HC*78 h) Road, Bargarh versus State of Chhattisgarh through the Coilector, Raipur The xnspector Genera‘ of Registration and Superintendent of Stamps, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, presently working at Gwalior 3. The District Regisirar and Couector of 4‘ Andhra Bank. a bedy corporate having common sea! and perpetual succession having inter aiia amongst other branches at Govt. Hospitai Stamps, Raipur Resgendents Road, Bargarh ifor the petitioners in both the Deputy GovernmentAdvocate for Mr‘ B.P.Sharma, counse petitions. Present Mr. Utkarsh Verma‘ respondents Mr. Yashwent No.1 Tiwari to 3 with in both Mr. the Amiyakant petitions. Tiweri, counsei for respondent No.4 in Writ Petition No.1 547 of 2001 . None appears for respondent No.4 in Writ Petition No.1990 of 2003. oRAL QBDER seed on 19‘; of September, 2906) (Pa xwf ’ The toiiowing order of the Cou >S.R.Nayat<, C.J. '. rt was passed by Learned counSei appearing tor ali the parties wouid submit tions is squarely covered h of this Court dated 11—32005 passed 0.1 450 of 1996 (M/s Ramesh Rolling Miils Private Limited that the point that arises for decision in these peti by the judgment of a Division Benc in Writ Petition N and others vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others). 2. In View of the above joint submission, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the above judgment and for the same reaeons set o 't :6; Gdpai out by this Court in that judgment. No costs. Sdl— i Sd/—é ,_ Satish K. Agnihotri 7a : ChiefJustice ‘/ i1 Judge j,