1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 44 OF 2009 Kanchan Rakesh Indulkar .. Applicant Vs. Rakesh Ramchandra Indulkar .. Respondent Mr. Niranjan Mogre, i/b. Mr. Bakul B.Bhosale,Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Sandesh Deshpande, Advocate, for the respondent. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 23rd April, 2010. P.C. 1. Learned Counsel for the applicant seeks adjournment. However, the learned Counsel for the respondent points out that the Marriage Petition No.556 of 2008 filed by the respondent before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane, for divorce has proceeded without written statement. Even evidence has already been led by the respondent and the matter is at the stage of judgment. It appears that even though this Application for transfer of the matter is pending for last one year, the applicant and her counsel are not interested in pursuing the matter and getting it disposed of early. On number of occasions, the matter has been adjourned at the request of the applicant. 2 2. For the aforesaid reasons, I find that no purpose will be served in withdrawing the matter from the file of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane and transferring the same to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ratnagiri at this stage. The Application stands rejected. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)