CRLR No. 3 of 2011 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Shri Narendra Bali, Advocate, present for the revisionist. Smt. Mamta Bisht, A.G.A, present for the State. Shri Nagesh Aggarwal, Advocate, present for the respondent nos. 2 to 5. Shri Nagesh Aggarwal, Advocate present for the respondent nos. 2 to 5 raised the preliminary objection that since the appeal under the proviso to section 372 of Cr.P.C., could be filed the revision is not maintainable. Learned counsel for the revisionist prays for and is allowed to withdraw the revision with liberty to seek the remedy available to him under the law. The revision is dismissed with liberty as above. The revisionist is allowed to take back to certified copy of the impugned order challenged in the revision on filing attested true copy of the same in the Registry. (P.C.Pant, J.) 25.07-2011 NP