IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5919 of 2011 DR.UPENDRA SHARMA, S/o Late Suraj Narain Sinha, Resident of Village-Shankerwar Tola, P.O. & P.S.- Mokama, District-Patna. …………………. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Vice Chancellor, Bhagalpur T.M. University, Bhagalpur 3. The Registrar, Bhagalpur T.M. University, Bhagalpur. 4. The Finance Officer, Bhagalpur, T.M. University, Bhagalpur. 5. The Principal, B.N.M. College, Barahiya, District – Lakhisarai. ……………….. Respondents ----------- 2 04.04.2011 Heard Sri Naresh Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Naresh Prasad, learned A.C. to Standing Counsel No. XXI appearing on behalf of respondent no. 1/State and Sri Anil Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 2 to 4/Bhagalpur Tilka Manjhi University, Bhagalpur. The petitioner, who superannuated with effect from 30.04.2009, as University Professor, Department of Chemistry, B.N.M. College, Barahiya under Bhagalpur Tilka Manjhi University, Bhagalpur has prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of difference of D.A. of G.P.F., amount of gratuity, leave encashment and G.I.C. The petitioner has also prayed for making payment of arrear of salary. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is getting his pension regularly and besides the 2 aforementioned amount other dues have already been cleared. So far as, the claim made in the present writ petition is concerned, the petitioner has filed a representation before the competent authority. However, till date, no decision has been taken. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to file a fresh representation. The writ petition stands disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner, to file a fresh representation before respondent no. 2/Vice-Chancellor, Bhagalpur Tilka Manjhi University, Bhagalpur, within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no. 2 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order, in accordance with law, redressing the grievances of the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of filing of representation. In case of refusal also, he is required to pass speaking order within the aforesaid time. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)