IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 397 OF 2006 Pramila Suman Singh, Thakur ... Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondent Mr. A.A. Bookwala for the petitioner. Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP for respondent No.1. Mr. S.G. Surana, Interveneur in Ch.S. No. 80/06 Mr. G.D. Utangale for respondent No.3. Mrs. P.A. Purandare for respondent No.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, : F.I. REBELLO, : F.I. REBELLO, ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 29th March, 2006 : 29th March, 2006 : 29th March, 2006 P.C. . The case of the petitioner is that she has applied to respondent No. 3 for development under Regulation 33(10). That application is still not disposed of. Shri Surana appearing for Bhavani Co-op. Housing Society submits that SRA Scheme has been sanctioned for TPS 569. Considering above, respondent No. 3 to hear the petitioner and if needed Bhavani Co-op. Housing Society and then to pass appropriate orders according to law within four weeks. 2. With the aforesaid reasons, the petition is disposed of. ( 2 ) 3. In view of the disposal of petition, the Chamber Summons becomes infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]