:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE REVIEW APPLICATION NO.5 OF 2008 REVIEW APPLICATION NO.5 OF 2008 REVIEW APPLICATION NO.5 OF 2008 IN IN IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.440 OF 2001 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.440 OF 2001 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.440 OF 2001 Shravan Dhanu More & Ors. (Since Deceased) ...Applicants. v. Dattatray K. Aslekar Retd. Military Soldier ...Respondent. Mrs.Suhasini Mutalik , adv. for the Applicants. Mr.Vishwanath Talkute, adv. for the Respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 17th July, 2008. DATE: 17th July, 2008. DATE: 17th July, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The respondent is landlord and he had filed Civil Revision Application No.440 of 2001 against Rejection of his application by the competent authority under Section 13A(1) of the Bombay Rent Act mainly on the ground that the landlord was co-owner of the property alongwith some other persons and all of them were not joined as parties. Revision Application was allowed by this Court by the judgment dated 27th February, 2008 after hearing the parties and after minutely considering the facts and the legal position. The tenant has filed this application for review of that order on the ground that the respondent/landlord had :2: also taken possession of some other property from a different tenant pending the revision application and, therefore, this revision application could not have been allowed. I am unable to accept this contention. While allowing the revision application, in paragraph 9 of the judgment, this Court had clearly noted that if the landlord does not occupy the premises or re-lets either the whole or any part of the premises within two years, the Competent Authority can pass the appropriate order under Section 31J on the application of the tenant for restoration of possession to him. In view of this, I find no substance in the present revision application. 3. Review Application stands rejected. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)