IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.803 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.100 OF 2008 BALASAHEB DATTATRAYA KALE V/S STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... Shri S.B.Sontakke h/f Shri M.A.Thorbole, Advocates for applicant, Shri D.V.Tele, AGP for respondent No.1, Shri D.R.Irale Patil, Advocate for respondents 2 and 3, Shri Phute h/f Shri D.V.Soman, Advocates for respondents 5,8,10,11,14, Shri H.S.Surve, Advocate for added respondent. ... CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & A.V.POTDAR, JJ. Dated : February 4, 2011 PER COURT :- 1. At the outset, learned Counsel for the applicants seeks to delete prayer clause (A) of the application. Leave granted. Deletion to be carried out forthwith. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants states that the applicants restrict relief prayed for in this application to the relief as spelled out in prayer clause (B) of the petition that is directing respondent No.1 to sanction casual leave to the members of the applicant association who wish to attend the conference scheduled to be held in the month of February 2011 at Sangli, pending hearing and final decision of the Writ Petition. 3. Without adverting to the other facts, it would be suffice to state that similar reliefs have been granted by the Court which was seized with Writ Petition No.100 of 2008. The order dated 27.4.2010 has been brought to our notice in which the Division Bench, in the light of the CIVIL APPLICATION NO.803 OF 2011 2 earlier orders passed by this Court, has directed that the teachers who intend to attend the conference would be permitted to do so and their absence would be treated as casual leave under the orders of this Court. Learned counsel for the applicants has stated before us that the applicants would not claim either special leave or TA or DA. 4. In the light of that matter, therefore, we allow this application and direct the respondents to treat the absence of the teachers, who intend to attend the conference at Sangli in February 2011, as casual absence. Those teachers would not be entitled for any special pay / allowance and would also be not entitled to claim any TA or DA. 5. The application is allowed accordingly. 6. Registry to make available authentic copy of this order to requesting parties. (A.V.POTDAR,J.) (P.V.HARDAS, J.) ... akl