Govt. Appeal (SJ) No. 38 OF 1995 In the matter of an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. ************ The Sate of Bihar ……(Appellant) Versus 1. Suresh Singh. 2. Dinesh Singh. Both sons of Bindhyachal Rai. 3. Rameshwar Singh, S/o Bhikhari Singh. 4. Randhir Singh, S/o Ram Tahal Singh. All R/o village-Admapur, P.S. Raghunathpur, District-Siwan. 5. Noor Hsan, S/o Khalil Khan, R/o Village-Khujawa, P.S.-Raghunathpur, District-Siwan. 6. Md. Alam. 7. Md. Hassan. Both R/o Registry Officer, P.S.-Siwan, District- Siwan. ……………(Respondent) ************* For the Appellant : Mr. R.B. Roy “Raman”, APP. ************ P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH Anjana Prakash, J. 1. The State has appeared against acquittal of the Respondents No. 1 to 7 for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) IPC by a judgment dated 19.08.1995 recorded by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Siwan in G.R. No. 457 of 1989, Tr. No. 286 of 1995. 2. On going through the judgment of acquittal and the accompanying records, I find that the acquittal was recorded for good reasons and there is no justification for interfering in the matter. The appeal is dismissed. (Anjana Prakash, J.) Patna High Court, Patna, Dated, the 5th May, 2011. NAFR/Vikash/-