1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. APPEAL NO.846 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.529 OF 2002 Vinodchandra Keshavlal Shah .. Appellant v/s. M/s.Manilal Patel & Co. and ors. .. Respondents Mr.S.N.Deshpande for the appellant. Mr.K.S.Bapat i/by Mr.J.K.Desai for the respondent No.1. CORAM : R.M.LODHA AND D.G.KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 19th November, 2005 P.C. Heard Mr.S.N.Deshpande, the learned counsel for the appellant. We also perused the order dated 9th April, 2001 upon which reliance was placed by the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. By the order dated 9th April, 2001, the Industrial Court declined to frame issue of jurisdiction and to decide the same as preliminary issue. In the said order, the Industrial Court has not recorded any finding about the maintainability of complaint or otherwise. In this view of the matter, the observation of the learned Single Judge that the aspect regarding the jurisdiction and the maintainability of complaint shall be decided at the time of the hearing of the complaint, cannot be faulted. 2 3. The impugned order does not call for any interference. The appeal is dismissed in limine. (R.M.LODHA, (R.M.LODHA, (R.M.LODHA, J.) J.) J.) (D.G. (D.G. (D.G. KARNIK, J.) KARNIK, J.) KARNIK, J.)