IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY APPEAL SUIT Nos.1557 ad 2997 OF 1999 A.S.No.1557 of 1999 Between: The Land Acquisition Officer, (Special Deputy Collector), Khammam. … Appellant And N.Padmaja … Respondent This Court made the following: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY APPEAL SUIT Nos.1557 & 2997 OF 2000 COMMON JUDGMENT: - (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy) These two appeals by the Land Acquisition Officer under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity, “the Act”) against the common order of the Senior Civil Judge, Khammam dated 07.06.1999, whereby nine O.Ps. were disposed of by a common order fixing the market value of the acquired land at Rs.50,000/- per acre with all statutrory benefits. It is also brought to our notice against the common order passed in O.P.Nos.104, 101, 105 107, 103 and 108 of 1992, A.S.Nos.2976, 2994, 2999, 3000, 3019 and 3085 of 1999 were preferred by the Land Acquisition Officer and the same were disposed of by this Court by a common order dated 28.07.2000 (to which one of us i.e., AGRJ is a party) confirming the fixation of the market value at Rs.20,000/- per acre. Further, the appeal value in both the appeals is Rs.10.735/- and Rs.482.50/-. Having regard to the involvement of trivial and insignificant amount, this appeal, in our considered opinion, ought not to have been preferred by the State. In view of the same, the present appeal is also dismissed. It is needless to say that the claimant is entitled to all the statutory benefits on the enhanced compensation, as per the law declared by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sunder v. Union of India {AIR 2001 SC 3516}. __________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J ____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 29th April 2010 lmv