IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R No.4708 of 2010 Date of Decision: 5.10.2010 Bir Sen. ....... Petitioner through Shri S.K.Yadav, Advocate. Versus The State of Haryana and others. ....... Respondent nos. 1 & 2 through Shri Kulvir Narwal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. Respondent no.3 through Shri Arun Walia, Advocate with Shri Amit Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? .... Mahesh Grover,J. This revision petition is directed against order dated 22.5.2009 passed by the Additional District Judge, Gurgaon whereby payment of 50% of the awarded amount of compensation has been ordered to be released on furnishing of security/bank guarantee. After hearing the counsel for the parties and noticing the fact that the controversy herein is squarely covered by the order passed by this C.R No.4708 of 2010 -2- .... Court in C.R.No.3912 of 2009- Samay Singh Versus State of Haryana and others, decided on 12.10.2009, the instant revision petition is disposed of in terms of order dated 12.10.2009 (Annexure P2). October 05,2010 ( Mahesh Grover ) “SCM” Judge