C.W.P. No. 14985 of 2006 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 14985 of 2006 (O&M) Date of decision: 07.12. 2006 Satish Uppal and Ors. .........Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana and Ors. ...........Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE NIRMAL YADAV Present: Mr. Shailndra Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.S. Kundu, Addl. A.G., Haryana -.- ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J (Oral) C.M. No. 16480 of 2006 C.M. is allowed and the main case is preponed from 23.01.2007 to today, for final disposal. Main case Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the cases of 20 other persons, whose plots were situated in D.L.F., Phase-II, Gurgaon like that of the petitioners, have been referred to the High Powered Committee by the State of Haryana. He further submits that only the case of the petitioners has been left out and, as such, prays that the case of the petitioners be also referred to the said Committee. Learned counsel also submits that the said Committee has not decided the case of the other plots owners, whose lands are adjacent to that of the petitioners' plots. C.W.P. No. 14985 of 2006 (O&M) 2 Mr. R.S. Kundu, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, submits that he is not aware as to whether the cases of the similarly situated persons, have been decided or not by the High Powered Committee. In view of the above statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, we dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents-State that the case of the petitioners shall also be considered by the High Powered Committee, constituted by the State of Haryana, along with the cases of the other similarly situated persons, in this very sector. However, if the cases of the other similarly situated persons have already been decided, then the petitioners shall not be entitled to any further consideration. ( ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA) JUDGE ( NIRMAL YADAV) JUDGE December 07, 2006 mohan