\ 1‘ C'mo’ai’w IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BEASPUR‘C.G.] ‘ i wm'r PETITION no l 7O [zoos mx'rmNER / '1‘.s. CHOUHAN, slo. SHRI HAJARI LAL CHOUHAN, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCCUPATION- SERVICE, PRESENTLY POSTED As TOW INSPECTOR, Rs. KUANKOA, DISTRICT DTEWADA, BASTAR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 216/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI PROHIBITION AND THER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS ORDER OR ORDERS ION OR DIRECTIONS. / .I IQ"/ ‘R ‘ N ND KN /’ 1. STATE OF CHHA’I'I‘ISGARH, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME(POLICE), MANTRALAYA, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH) . . DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ( 0/ 'v\ POLICE ' HQ” RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH) / 3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HQ, RAIPUR (CHI-IATTISGARH). J 4. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BASTAR RANGE, JAGDALPUR (CHHATTISGARH) . /5. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT ‘- DANTEWADA, (CHI-IAT’I‘ISGARH.) §2 33W,m,mmg£ , m mm ' W'€%Vlo . mmataa ' WWEwW 3.8.2005 Smt. Reema Dubsy, coun sel for the petitioner. Shn' Akhil . ‘Agrawal? Pansl Lawyer Sfate/ respondents on advance copy. ' I.A.No. '6 19 1[2005 .. This all application for urgent hearing. The matter is taken up on boald. This interim «application W.P.No.3 170/2005 Heard Smt; Reema Dub «R for the ds disposed of. , counsel forthe petitioner and Shri Akhil Agrawal, Panel LaWy er for the State] respondents on advance copy. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner, who is working. n the post of Town Inspector of RS. Knankonda, District—Darn wada, has completed his 2 1/2 yeais of service in‘the nexalites a and therefore, he is entitled to be transferred to an area of 's own choice as per clause 7 of the SOP No. 1 dated 13.2.2001. A copy of the aforesaidSOP has also been med .as Annexnre —10. She submits that after completion of the aforesaid pe od as required by the SOP, the petitioner had made a represen tion to the concerned authority but, the concerned authority h s not taken any decision on the representation of the petitioner the petitioner is still working in the said area—Which accor to the petitioner is a nexalites affected area. In the present s' nation, learned counsel for the s e e d d'