IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35868 of 2009 1. MOHAMMAD MUKHTAR ANSARI , 2. Chhotu Ansari alias Manaur Ansari, both sons of Amanullah Ansari, residents of village Kantari, P.S. Deo, District Aurangabad … … Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR… ..OPPOSITE PARTY For the Petitioners: Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Meena Singh, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, Advocate ----------- 2 26.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are accused in a case registered under sections 328, 379 and 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that one person, namely, Mithilesh Singh was apprehended by the police on the Railway Station and he had confessed the guilt that he was a member of the gang operating in the area and they used to induce intoxicants upon the passengers for the purpose of looting the articles. He had also disclosed the names of the petitioners being leaders of the gang. It is further submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are owners of a shoe-shop and the aforesaid accused Mithilesh Singh had once demanded a shoe free 2 of cost, which was denied to him, therefore, he has falsely implicated the petitioners in this case. It is also submitted that there is nothing against the petitioners except the confessional statement of the aforesaid accused Mithilesh Singh. The petitioners are stated to be of clean antecedents and are in jail custody since 27.05.2009. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, Mohammad Mukhtar Ansari and Chhotu Ansari alias Manaur Ansari, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Railway Magistrate, Gaya, in G.R.P.S. Case No. 71/09 on further condition that one of the bailors must be close relative or family member of each of the petitioners. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)