:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NO. 940 OF 2008 NO. 940 OF 2008 NO. 940 OF 2008 IN IN IN EXECUTION EXECUTION EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 151 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 151 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 151 OF 2008 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1791 OF 2004 SUIT NO. 1791 OF 2004 SUIT NO. 1791 OF 2004 M/s. Raj Dairy Products. ... Plaintiffs. V/s. M/s. Panjabi Ghasitaram Halwai Karachiwala. ... Defendant. Mr. S.G. Lakhani for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendant. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 16TH 16TH 16TH DECEMBER 2008. DECEMBER 2008. DECEMBER 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . On the last occasion, a Advocate was present and he stated that the Defendant/Judgment Debtor has received the Notice but would like to file a reply. At the request of the learned Advocate, matter was adjourned till today. Today, neither is the Judgment Debtor present nor his Advocate. It is apparent from the earlier order that the Notice is duly served. In these circumstances, and when all ingredients of Order XXI Rule 22 are satisfied, the Notice is made absolute. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)