(^l^ 3E;8'8][-P i r.V v^ IN THE mpH COURT 0_F_CHFIATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. »^ / 2005 PETITIONER ^ <^ ^y> >9U'., y'!f'\..-'^ \^-" ^^ ^c/ Laxmikant Gaikwad S/o Late S.D. Gaikwad Age^, about 54 years, Working as T.I, P.S- Chinniri Dist- Koria (Baikunthpur) C.G Versus RESPONDENTS sf ^'L ^) 2^^^ / 1. StafeofChhattisgarh Through Secretaiy, Department OfHome (Police) Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipui' (C.G) / 2. Superintendent ofPolice Dist- Koria (Baikunthpur) Chhattisgarh 3. C. S. Sharma Working as Town Inspector Patna, Dist- Koria (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRJT ORDER OF DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. SwT-«i« irt<.i, y-CTtwifi, firtKiyt lTTOr^Tt^--^^oi-^14^^200 3IT^91'R^(>jc|ij6|<g) sn^sTtpT R-ii<h ?PIT3tI^STst)lith ) S'RIISR?rf^3 SIT^ST .•a_B_s tj — h/— coUnsel Shri H.S. Ahlywalia, colin S'nri Bhasknr Pyasi, F^ No.l and 2. TTse petifioner ha? pr^t by the order dated 31-3-20q! has been transferred from P] I hcve heard ieorned c( Learned counssi for where the Detitioner has b^en Pa+nQ- Secona grievance petiTone" is that the petitior at BalaahGt from 1997 to 3 once.fne police officer posl| for the Dosting of his choid posted is oarl- of Naxaiitss] Detitioner's trwisfer is bed. tearned counsel furthler ailowed to make a detciied rfe; yiTtrfW^T *<1'llo't'^f (•s*^£t'duRCR ^5^|R*13II^?I Linsei for fne petitio.ner. Cf bnel Lawyer for the State/resoondsnts rerred this writ petition being aggrieved ;assed by respondent No.2 whereby he 5. Chirmiri to P.S. Patna. surisei for the oetitoenr'. fhe pstitioner' subiTsitteci that ths pia-se en transferred there is no oost of T.1., ond posted at P.5. advanced bv iearned counsel for the ier has alreadv worked in NaxaiiTes areas ;000 and ss Dsr the iSoverrsments soiicv ed i'n^the_Naxaiites arsas, he is entitted 3 .a=ttie-pua^~ii"u^^ iace where the petitionar has now been affecTed areas. On This. counr aiso The submitted •friat the petitioner moy be epresentation to respondent Nc.2 and he ^CT| <-i)K4lrt<l, t»-ct|<(-i<i<o,[6irtitiy<< *II*ICTI ®TT^ 3II^<1WTR-ii* ?raTan^sTdi*(ich ^-^ sn^ST cRpp (ijciijci.d) W^ 200 bs directed to clecide +h| respondents No.l and 2 has i'| Havina henrd iearned the fscords ond also lookin<t counsel for the petitiofier oetitioner is allo< To reSDondent N®.2within a respondent No.2 wiii decl^ within a psriod of one m^ representation after cons petitioner i" an objeetiv®mai^ maitn With the clirection afd Consequentiy, M.(W.)fl aiso sta-td diSDOSed of. Parties are entitled fo| ibWfd41-< IFRff^'fetSt x(ul«l< ^3|R|13II^8T scme to which learnea counsei for |o objection. ^ounsel for the petitionsr, hsv'ing perused kin^ to ths limited requsst mctds by iear'nsd which appears To be Just and fair, the i^ake a detaiied representation before p^riod or 10 days from todoy and in turn l(fe the reoresentation of 1+ie oeTitioner mAn'J+l from the date of "eceiD.t of ths tderina at! the Doints raised by the matlncr in aeeordAnce witii !aw. af4rwsaid, the petition stcmds disposed of- t N0.1327/200S and I.A. No.3293/2005 ' certified CODV of fnis or'der. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo