THE HONBLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.1520 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the interim order dated 29.01.2008 granted by this Court, the petitioner was allowed to attend the interview and therefore no further enquiry is necessary in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 14.10.2008. Kgr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No: 1520 of 2008 Between: Barigala Shyam Sukumar, S/o B. Shyam Sunder, r/o H. No. 11-24-83, II Bank Colony, Warangal- 506002. Andhra Pradesh. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Registered Office: 17, Jamshedji Tata Road, Mumbai-20 rep by its Chairman& Managing Director. 2 Hyderabad LPG Regional Office, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., HCL Post Office, PB No. 2 Cherlapally, Hyderabad-500051 represented by its Senior Regional Manager, .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the order dated 19-01-2008 of the 1st respondent signed by the Coordinator, for Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., as illegal arbitrary and opposed to principles of natural justice and the same may be set a side the accept the application of the petitioner dated 31-10-2007 for HPCL LPG DISTRIBUTION SHIP IN STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH FOR LOCATION: GHANPUR STATION Submitted in response to the advertisement of the 1st respondent and published in news paper on 1-10-2007, calling for applications for being appointed as LPG Distributing in various places in Andhra Pradesh, and pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. P.KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. THOOMSRINIVAS The Court made the following: