1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2183 OF 2010 Mrs. Varsha Vaibhav Haldankar ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ----- Mr. Kuldeep S.Patil for Applicant Mrs. R.V. Newton -APP for State Mr. Nivas Patil for Respondent No.2 ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 22ND JUNE, 2010 P.C. 1. The Applicant is the original Complainant. She had filed her complaint which was registered with the Pant Nagar Police Station, Ghatkopar for the offence punishable under section 498-A, 406 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Thereafter a petition was filed for divorce by mutual consent by the Applicant and her husband in the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai and in the said petition, consent terms were filed and in the said consent terms, the Applicant had agreed to withdraw the criminal complaints filed by her and in view of the said undertaking given by the Applicant in the Family Court, the present application has been filed by her. 2 2. Since the Complainant herself has filed this petition for quashing the complaint, in my view, the application needs to be allowed. 3. I have perused the consent terms filed by the parties. In paragraph 4, it is stated that the Applicant has agreed to withdraw the complaint filed by her. 4. Under these circumstances, therefore, application is allowed and is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed of. (V.M. KANADE J.)