IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT bF‘JIJ‘bICAT’URE ’AT’ ABILASPUR CHHATTISGARH Writ Petitign (C) No. €96) or 2007 PETITIONER : «’ Rambhola Sahu, S/o Mehatar Lal Sahu, aged about 51 years, R/o Village—Birgahani (Chha.), Block- Baloda, Tahsil—Janjgir, District Janjgir— Champa (C.G.) — Versus — RESPONDENTS: m r/ / 1. Lakshiprasad Sahu, S/o Neelkanth Sahu, aged 36 years, Caste—Sahu, ”f /2. Anu Kumar, S/o Sonsai, aged 38 years, Caste—Vishwakarma, l3. Ashok Kumar, S/or‘“‘“'CBe)3H Satnami, aged 3O years, /, 4. Omprakash Patel, S/o Pitarram Patel, aged 28 years, Caste-Patel, Kanshiram, S/o Nakched, aged ,50 years, Caste—Satnami, , 6. Kunjbihari, S/o Manglu, aged 4O years, Caste—Sahu, M, 7. Krishnaprasad, S/o Dharamlal, aged 27 years, Caste-Sahu, Gopaldas, S/o Vishnudas, aged 28 years, Caste-Vaishnav, /9. Gourishankar, S/o Lachchiram, aged 33 years, Caste-Yadav, K10. Ghanshyam, S/o Mukul, aged 26 years, Caste-Patel, /.11. Chandanlal, S/o Atmaram, aged 47 years, Caste—Yadav, / 22. /23. /25. /26. MMM Hv Jairarn, S/o Chhotelal, aged years, Caste—Sahu, Dileshwar, S/o Ramlal, aged 4O years, Caste—Sahu, Deenbandhu, aged Johan, aged 35 years, Caste-Satnami, Poorandan, S/o Mahettar Lal, aged 46 years, Caste—Sahu, Dhansai, S/o Karia, aged 40 years, Caste-Satnami, Patiram, S/o Amarnath, aged 4O years, Caste—Suryavanshi, Pannalal, S/o Phoolsai, aged 28 years, Caste—Sahu, Balaji, S/o Bodhiram, aged 47 years, Caste—Sahu, Mohanlal, S/o Premlal, aged 45 years, Caste—Sahu, Rajkumar, S/o Navalsai, aged 32 years, Caste—Kevta, Rajkumar, S/o Kiran, aged 3O years, Caste—Sahu, Rajkumar, S/o Mangal, aged 4O years, Caste—Yadav, Ramratan, S/o Samelal, aged 40 years, Caste—Sahu, Sitaram, S/o Sundarsai, aged 55 years, Caste—Sahu, Hariram, S/ o Malikrarn, aged 73 years, Caste—Rathore uWE/O $33k _ 3%:g‘gi/ @wh‘q' ~ 3“ Presiding Officer, Panchaya Elections, Gram Panchayat— Birgahani (Chha.), Block—Baloda, Tahsil—Janjgir, District Janjgir— Charnpa (C.G.) ZS$ W (CW) via rfictLuJg, ayhadawpd (c‘ 0v) 1/ I” 28. Janjgjr Sub~Divisiona1 Distri Officer (Revenue), (C.G.) ct Janjgir—Champa EQGH CQURT OF CHHA’I‘TISGARH AT BILASPUR ($3 ON (C) No. 6765 of2007 : Rambhola Sahu. VERSUS : Laksmiprasad Sahu & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2267 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA NR SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. WMT PETITI PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Present: Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate for the Shri N.N.Rey, Pane} Lawyer for the State/rsspondent petitioner. N0. 28. ORDER ORAL) (Passed 1. on '27 day of July, 2010) Learned couns¢1 appearing for the petitioner, on instructions. 2. submits that tho petition has become infmctuous. Learned counsel appealing for other side does Bot controvert the 3. above submission. In View of the above. the writ petition is dismissed as having iDecome mfructuous. . .”W l Sd/— _ ‘ Satish K. AgnihOt“