IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.22391 of 2009 Between: Karne Chandraiah, S/o. Late Veeraiah ..... PETITIONER AND The District Collector, Khammam and others ....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner : Counsel for the Respondents : The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.22391 OF 2009 ORDER: On 20-10-2009, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition had taken notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4, Sri Nandigam Krishna Rao had taken notice on behalf of respondent No.5 and requested time to get instructions. 2. The matter is coming up for admission. 3. Heard the learned counsel on record. 4. This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus declaring action of the respondents in not releasing compensation amount to the petitioner in view of taking over his two houses bearing No.12-25/1 of Srirangapuram (v), Manuguru (M), Khammam District for the purpose of open cost mine No.2, despite directions of respondent No.3, dated 04- 08-2009 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to record and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently to direct the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to conduct spot inspection and release the compensation payable to the petitioner. 5. Several facts have been narrated in detail in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. 6. It is stated that on 05-01-2009, notification was issued by the respondents calling for objections with regard to acquisition by the Government. On 04-02-2008, the petitioner submitted representation to respondent No.3 in the meeting convened by him in Grama Shaba. On 04-08-2009, a representation was submitted by the wives of the petitioner to respondent No.3, who in turn directed respondent No.4 to conduct personal inspection. It is also stated that on 22-10-2009 respondents are going to release compensation to the displaced persons. 7. In the light of the facts and circumstances noticed, it is stated that respondent No.3 had already forwarded the representation of the petitioner, dated 04-08-2009, to respondent No.4. Let respondent No.4 consider the said representation and dispose of the same in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ P.S.NARAYANA, J October 23, 2009 Note: Furnish C.C. of the order within one week. B/O.MD