IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 1760 of 2009 Between: K.Sathemma, W/o. Late Gangaram R/o. Korutla Proper and Mandal, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Korutla Municipality, Rep by its Commissioner, Korutla, Karimnagar District. 2 Guntuka Rajaram, S/o. Rajalingam, R/o. H.No.1-1-338, Kallur Road, Korutla Proper and Mandal, Karimnagar district. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus or any other writ order or direction declaring the action of the respondents no.1 in passing any orders considering the representations submitted by the petitioners dated 23-6-2008 and dated 28-7-2008 and in pursuance of the notices issued by the respondent No.1 dated 13-6-2008 and 29-7-2008 for canceling the house number allotted i.e., 1-4-178/1 in favour of the respondent No.2 in the land belong to the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal, null and void and also violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of principles of natural justice, consequently direct the respondent no.1 to consider the representations submitted by the petitioner dated 23-6-2008 and dated 28-7-2008 and the notices issued by the respondents no.1 in pursuance of the representations submitted by the petitioners and pass appropriate orders for cancelling the houses number allotted i.e, 1-4-178/1 in favour of the respondents No.2. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.P.RADHAKRISHNA The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner stating that she owns an extent of 280 square yards of land in Sy.No.1272 around which she constructed a compound wall. The 2nd respondent claiming to be the owner of an extent of 109.62 square yards in Sy.No.1266/1 got allotted house number 1-4-178/1 to the compound wall constructed by her and, therefore, she made a representation to the 1st respondent stating that the land in Sy.No1266/1 is not situated at the road side and that the land in Sy.No.1272 is only situated on the road side and requested for enquiring into the matter by looking into the documents submitted by the 2nd respondent. Even the Mandal Surveyor after conducting survey issued a trench plan. Pursuant to the said representation, the 1st respondent issued a notice dated 13.6.2008 to the 2nd respondent asking him to submit the relevant documents or else to cancel the allotment of house number. The grievance of the petitioner is that after issuing the said notice, no action has been taken by the 1st respondent even though the 2nd respondent has not submitted any documents and hence this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the 1st respondent Municipality and at their request the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. Admittedly, pursuant to the representation made by the petitioner, the 1st respondent has already issued notice to the 2nd respondent but has not taken any action pursuant thereto. Therefore, since the representation of the petitioner is still pending consideration before the 1st respondent, he is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on the said representation after giving opportunity to the 2nd respondent to putforth his case. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.18.2.2009 msv.