^ 1- IN THE^IIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l S;« ^ CR.A.No. ^^ 107 (S.B.) -~i .C; ^ APPELLANT In Manihar S/o Shivprasad About 5 lyears Village Bhothali, P.S.- Anda Distt. Durg (C.G.) RESPONDENT State of Chhattisgarh Through :- D.M.-Durg (C.G.) CRIMINALAPPEAL UNDER SECTION 374 (2) OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE sn^r^ii h-U* 3IRCT sb+liqi ^lf^i -s^ •airai?rq. 'SFatOTS. [twitiy 31R(?T iRra? . s^.:^^..:i3s.s^t •-••-•-^•200 inNWI tb*ll<h fci'b^sr' 311^[i^11W(fe SB: HUi'S'UlJffi SMK1 DlilRJSMURA M1SUKA.J. ^APPELLANT v' SESPONDENT 14-9-3U07 Shri Vivfik Pandev- Advo Slin Sancleep ¥acla\'j Uy. ilus revision is [lu'ected: sentence dated 29-11-2006 oass Adclitional Kessions Judge. Uui's, u, ot l.F.c. and senteiicecl ftnn to Case ot ttie prosecution i; appellant. ne usecl to quaiTel appellant. Un tiie date ot mcidei brotSiei' MuKesli and chasecl to &ema unsuccesstul, lie picKed u{ Wlien tbe rartei' ttroke clown, fie ^ result ot wlucft Uie deceasea sust m para:3 ot ffie juagiiient ancl Hmcliliaram Katiu ^-icle lix. r-x. post mortem wnere L)r. y..N. su&mittea lus rqiort ot jh,x. P-L two tracture mjunes over ngtit an *i<)f<'i41-t iwrif^ ft^ <fati;i< i?3iP<m3ii^T l^mfiar; K;'o SliRyi'asag; a&out 31 years, village"fe hothali; P.S. Anda Disri. Dura (CG; ;fe ate ol Uitiattisgarli, tln-ougli u.M., Uurg (CU-) ate for the annellant j0\t. Affvocate tor tbe State. against ttie judgment ot conviction and order ot pd in S.T. No. 41/2006 TOiei'eby the leanied 2"" tias eonwctea tlie appeUant undei- Section j"4 Fart- (indergo S.l. tor j years. mat cieceasea lan'ilal was a notonous son ot ttie tvith lus tamily memtiers mclua'mg ttie accused II, at attOtd 1U.UU a.m. tie was c{uan'eling witli tus ;| |eat him. Ifieappellaiit tnscl to mtervene anfl on;> a ratter lymg nearby and startcd assaulting Iiim.ai jicliea up an iron Irymg pan anct assautted ftun, as a;, tmetl is-al 17 nyunes overlus-person as cSescnOecl,^! pied on t&e spot. Keport was loclged by F.W. I^y |fie deacl bocty ot tne deceasea lamlalwassent'tor;i pevangan (f.W. 6) conclucted post mqrtem ana;| and noticed 17 nyuries over tae persoi^. ot ttie3] deceased inchiding two fracture i4JBries over rigtit parietal bone and troiltal bone and| lettjaw ot me deceased. 1:31 (,.!,M.ja|.a(^> XI-HC-22 aii^r^T f<;-ti<<i 311^1 ^fcii<=o flr^ct T^ •*l]''<l<'f''1, aTil'M'ie, (qCTiyy 3ii^?T xnra? \ llflWI Shtllth"""'""""'""""""""""""'^ 200 •fci<i<isr----------- 3ii^ii^<iiw flfer Uom.'ietion ottlie appella4t F.W. 1 Hmclitiaram yaliu ana r\ statea mat tiie accusea resiaes m ownbome wliei'e the appeilant, til) ot mcident, the appellant contess^ nas murderecl uis elder son l.amlal w&ereupon tie w.ent along wrth tli{ sun'encterea betore me police. After accused ana saw tlie ciead bodv ol statemerit ot P.W. 4 Kagliunath. l|lie MmcMiaram ana F.W. 4 K.agliu^aUi consiaermg tliat tfie appellant tias| 513 ot Ur.i'.C., fias lield tte app^Uant taKmg mto consicleration tftat tti^ premedltation, msteaa ot convicl con-victecl hun under Kection .JU4 Ifart tttree vears. : Leaxsea. counsel tor me appeal against me conviction ol| nowever &e subrmts tliat tafcmg sKDulcl oBendei', therefore he 4 ofthe Probation ofOffenders A4t. On the other hand, learrieti sustamed l/ gi-ievous injunea ov^r part ot bociy i.e. aeaa and jaw. l.fe ^)t<il<n<liri 'RTO^ff'^^^ <P>i^i< ^; aipgif sn^r -I .E •s- \t is based 6n lus extra judicial eoiitession before I W. 4 Ragtiuriath. P.W. 1 Hinchharam Sahu has | llie same lane wnei'e iie resiaes. 1 amlal aied m tas .;<f wits aaa tus sonMukesli also resicle. untiie aate :E ^d betore flnn^m presenee ot KuUuya Uai ttiat Be s and asked tiim to accompany tum to police station ;: ^: accused on i'us motorcycle to poUce ^tation wlio ; retuimng bome, iie went to the iiouse ol ttie '; lamlal lymg drencfted witft blood. Kmular is tlie tnal Court consiaermg tiie stateinent ot F.\V. 1 ;: to Eie reliable and ti-ustwoitfty and turttier 3 actmitted tlus tact m lus statement unaer yection .' jUant guilty ot c.ausmg aeata ot lamlal aowevei', ' mcident occun'ed oa a spur ot moment wittiout;'; |mg tlie appellant rauler Mection JU2, l.r.C. fias:-" 11 ot l.F.c. and seiitenced to unclergo K.l. tOTi; atipeliant latrly sutanits that lie is not pressmg flle;; ttie appeUant uncter section-.jU4 Fart-U, LffV.^ |mto consicteration at the appeUant is ttie tirs(|;, be extenffea benetrt ot i SectianM: counael tor tne Mtate submits ttiat ttiei i': :;. ^;:'. rs tus person mclndtng 4 iracture m)unes on -vSaiy mjuries present over fhe person oftheyeceasedls 'tN f XI-HC-22 's^ •^l^ld^. onl«*i<o. I'Kii'My WTfiraiiitti 3H^?T 'q?ra? ...Qy:.&.^3. "Ht. 200 » •f ;r 1 ft^ar SII^T^I [<;•«<* 311^1 ?ti*iico <tf^a \ p. clearrv establisfies tne mtention eitcumstances, the jafl sentence termea to t)e;exeessive. ^ • .1 tia">.'e fiearcl leamed couns. Attei' gomg ttirougn ttie m ueseasecl ancl also considei'uig tlia as own son, l am ot tlie consiclei- impugnea orcler wtiei'eby Uie appi ana DrutaUty ot tlie appeUant and m tliese | (t tliree years K.l. uiiposed upon lum cannot be :;j rtie appeai bemg clevoia dismissea. : chl<lT<Tl4ll "RFRff^ 'f^t {faf-^K ^; 3iPOT,3ii^r fltortaeparties. :^; [uries mentioned m the post mortein repoit ot the . the above mjunes wei'e mllisted by tiie lauier to ; scl opmion ttiat no mterterence is called tor m ttte ? Uant lias tieen seiitenced to undergo H.l. tor tliree ''. ot substance is Uatfle to be and is accoraingly •; Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge