1 IN TEE HIGH. COURT OR RARNPTA1, CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OP DECEMBER 2009 PRESENT THE HON ‘HUE lvi RJUSTICE ID. \/.SHYLENDRA RUMAR AND THE HON ‘ELF; MRJUST1CE bLNRES1 IAVANARAYANA CJO. 1367 2OflLI BETWEEN: OANAPAT1, iC GuflARiE hArk TUt AOE:47, 0CC: FLOOR MILL BUSINESS, F/C BELLUBI31, TQ&D1ST: BIJAPUR COMPLAINANT (By Sri VS. Kotennavar, Advj AND: SANUANABASA PEA, S/0 HANMANT KALYANI ACE: 37, 000:VIOE PR ES! DENT CONGRESS BLOCK COMMI’VrEE MAMADAPUR AND SECRETARY ORAMA MANDAL,R/0:BELLUBBi TQ B DIST:PJJAFUR 2. MALEPPA 5/0 PAD EPPA HOSAMANI AOL 42 Ocr AGPI( ULTIJPF &ND EX-VV’L PRESIDENT SDMC, CFLPSCHOOL BELLUBBI. R/O:BELLUBBI 7 . B iJ5 9 t AP P 3. SIDDU Sb HANAMANTH.YARNAL AGE: 37, OCC:AGRICULTURE. MEMBER OF S,D.M.C OF THOTADASHALE,BELLUBBI R/O:BELLUBI,TQ & DIST:BIJAPUR 4. SURESH 5/0 MALEPPA NYAMAGOUDHA AGE: 38 OCC:AGRICULTURE,MEMBER OF S.D.M.C. GOVERNMENT HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL BELLUBBI,R/O:BELLUBBI TQ & DIST:BIJAPUR 5. SURESH S/O SANGAPPA DIVATAGI AGE: 35 0CC :AGRICULTURE, EX-MEMBER BELLUBI ,R/O:BELLUBBI TQ & DIST:BIJAPUR 6. BIMAPPA S/0 KAKLLAPPA YARANAL AGE: 26 OCC:AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS,R/O:BELLUBI TQ & DIST:BJJAPUR 7. SHARANAPPA S/O BHIMAPPA BASHEYFI AGE: 39 OCC:AGRICULTURE AND SECRETARY OF MANASA GANGOTRI EDUCATION INSTITUTION, R/O:BELLUBBI TQ & DIST:BTJAPUR 8. RAMAPPA S/0 SANGAPPA ULLAGADDI AGE: 40 OCC:AGRICULTURE.EX-MEMBER OF TOTADASHALE S.D.M.C,BELLUBBT TQ & DIST:BIJAPUR 9. BASAVARAJ S/0 SANGANABASAPPA DIVATAGI AGE: 38 OCC:AGRICULTURE,R/O:BELLUBBI TQ & DIST:BIJAPUR 10. SIDDAPPA Sb SHIVAPPA KOLAKAR AGE: 27 OCC:AGRJCULTURE 3 R/O:E3ELLUBBI,TQ & DISTL:BIJAPUR 11. MALEPPA Sb MALEPPA BASHETFI AGE: 66 OCC:AGRICULTURE,R/O:BELLUBBI TQ & DIST:BIJAPUR 12. SIDARAYA Sb HUCHAPPA DHARIGOND AGE: 36 OCC:AGRICULTURE R/O:BELLUBBI TQ & DTST:BIJAPUR 13. SHIVALINGAPPA S/O.GANGAPPA UPPAR AGE: 31 0CC :AGRICULTURE, R/0:BELLUBBI TQ& DIST:BIJAPUR 14. MALLYYA 5/0 MALAYA MATHAPATHI AGE: 46 OCC:AGRICULTURE R/O: BELLUBBI TQ & DJST:BIJAPUR 15. ARJUN Sf0 ADIVEPPA UPPAR AGE: 41 OCC:AGRICULTURE R/O:BELLUBBI TQ & DIST:BIJAPUR 16. GOVIND Sb HANUMANT KAMAT AGE: 43 OCC:AGRICULTIJRE R/O:BELLUBBI TQ & DIST:BIJAPUR 17. SMT.DUNDAVVA W/O KBHIMAPPA GANGER AGE: 46 OCC:AGRICULTURE & MEMBER OF MANDAL PANCHYAT.JANAPUR R/O:BELLUBBLTQ & DIST:BIJAPUR 18. HANAMANTH Sf0 SANGANBASAPPA KALYANISHETIY AGE: 71 OCC:AGRICULTURE,R/O:BELLUBBT TQ & DIST:BIJAPUR 4 19. ERAPPA S/O KMALLAPPA SHIROL AGE: 63 OCC:AGRICULTURE &L BUSINESS R/O:BELLUBBI.TQ & DIST:BIJAPUR 20. MALLAYYA 5/0 SHIVALINGAYVA BADAGIMATH AGE: 62 0CC AGRICULTURE EX MEMBER OF GROUP GRAMA PANCHYAT,HANGARGI & TRUSTEE OF RAJATESHWAR DEVSTHAN, BELLUBBI R/O:BELLUBBI,TQ &L DIST:BIJAPUR RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED THIS CCC IS FILED U/S 11 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR FILING FALSE AFFIDAVIT AND AVERMENTS IN WP NO.2870/2008 DTD: 26.5.08 AND PUNISH ThEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. ThIS CCC COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, SRI. D.V. SHYLENDRA KUMAR, J. DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT This contempt petition by the first respondent in Writ Petition No.2870/2008 (GM-RES-PIL) is not on the premise that there is any violation or dis-obedience of the court order but for the reason that the writ petitioners who are arrayed as respondents — accused Nos. 1 to 20 have all sworn to a false affidavit by stating incorrect facts before this Court in Writ Petition, S therefore, they are liable for the action in contempt jurisdiction. 2. We notice from the order passed in the Writ Petition that the Writ Petition itself was dismissed without granting any relief to the petitioners but with the observation that it is open to the petitioners or the other aggrieved persons to approach the authorities like the Pollution Control Board or the District Medical Officer, if any licence or permission is granted to start the Flour Mill in violation of the provisions of the Statutory provisions and etc., When the Writ Petition itself having been dismissed, the first respondent should have felt happy but has taken route to come back before this Court in contempt petition against the respondents. 3. It is not necessary for us to go into the question as to whether the petitioners had placed some incorrect facts or otherwise before the Court, as the petitioners have not been given any relief at all in the 6 Writ Petition and the Writ Petition having been dismissed, it is not necessary for us to enable him to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents. The Contempt Petition is dismissed. sd/i, JUDGE Sd/ JUDGE P1*