11m H,“ Hl_. n$ "”P (CH‘vu 7 $2016 Jawahar‘ La: Nehru Mi$sion, Director Delhi 1 N "a Raip'lr Deveicpment Antho'ity, in front 01 the Mahanad: Dwai Mantralaya ' Ramur— '492001 vhhat‘isgarh Turouyh Thar Chie. Executive Offcer Navdee‘p Singh Chawia 8/0 Triiochan Triiochan Singip Chawi-a, S/o Late Surjeet Singh Ehawala, aged about 63 years, Harinder Kaur lo Trilochan Singh Chawla ageda m? 61 wars Amaxjeet Kaur W/o Nan/deep $ingh‘ Chawala aaed about 36 vears Pray”; Tnlochcan et Smut? Si gh Chaw!a C5aWla aqeél about S/G 32 years r-Aii Rfo Surieei Niwas. 31'51. Ravi Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh. § RESPGNDENT$ mate of Chna’r‘isgarh miough their Chief Secretanf Mantralaya DKS Bhawaw Raiyur Cnhatusgarh india. Through: "Their Union of Secretary, Ministry of' Urban Developmei‘it Govt of im‘ia, Nirmari Bhawan,7New Dew—1 . Urban Renewai MiSsion Urban VDeveiop'went Nirman Bhawa'i New i.mroUg‘rT . i.meii‘ x Mlhistiy oi ' Nat r'ai Hrghways Authort‘, of indie G-s & a Sectm 10 Dwarka. New Delhi- 110 075. Director Raipur bhhattiégarh. Naga' Tatha Gram Nivesh, Chhamsgarh Ervrrvnment Cchservatic’n Board, Through Then Member Secretary,’H.N.! Tilak Nagar _ Shiv Mahdir Chowk, Main Road, Avanti Vihar, Raipm. Chhattisgarh. M/s Sheladia‘ Associates inc in JV _ Vas eunsuirauts Private 'Ltd- NHAI _ mouave Oid Dairyk‘k I! Farm, i Vishékhapatnam Andra» 5300 ‘ Pradesh- 0“ )h. x_ CD 1 COURT 0" ”hHATTi"GARI-i BELASPUR ‘Singh Chawlae afed aboui 36 years, aL @ WP. (C) No. 73": 91'201 G WRIT PéTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE ¢ONSTETUTIGN OF iNmA Ah iapearage: Mr. Rajkarnai Singh, Advocate for the petiiione _ Mr: Mr} Arvind Sumesh Dubey Bajaj, and Advaca:e Mr, Shashank and Ms. Thakur, Trépté game! ewangan, Lawyers Advocate for the State. appeax's oni Ebehah‘ of Mr. A.S. Kacahhawaha, Advocates fot New Raipur Devé!opment Autherity. ' ‘ l Mrs.§ Fouzia Miiia. Assi$iani Solicitor Generai if“ Union of india. (09.03251 1) QRAL oRsER i . 1 SUML KUMAR S!NHA,J. eara. Theée are the bunch of six writ petition; Mr. Sumesh Baja‘j, teamed couneei for New Raipur Deveie‘pment Authotity‘ has submitted a document dated 23.02.2011 (in WP.(C) Ne. 1350:2010), which : shows that seme compromise has taken piece between the petitioners and the concerned authority and now the petitioners have agreed to take baok'ihis writ t p” tition. Mn; Raj‘amai .Singh‘ teamed counsei for the petitioners, in View of the document: ‘ dated k 28.02.11, seeks r permission . . to Withdraw . this . writ . petition l. . wu‘n ‘ .L ? 7 . iibeny to fiie another writpetition, if future deveiopments so warrant. ,_ i 7 Permission granted. Z Aocordin'giy, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid: tiberty granted in favour of the petitioners. Sd/- p . Sunil Kunfar Sinha _ Judge Ctfie y s ie erid cop a per rus.