IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19408 of 2011 Umesh Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 16.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 24.3.2011 since he has been arrested with the stolen motorcycle which was the subject matter of murder case. In view of such, I am not inclined to review the earlier order. The prayer for bail is rejected. Now the Trial Court is directed to proceed with the Trial even in absence of the petitioner since Section 273 Cr. P.C. enjoins the Court to record evidence even in the absence of the accused in presence of his Pleader. The Trial Court (Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar) is directed to send a list of the witnesses fixing specific dates for production of the witnesses along with a copy of this order in connection with Krishna Braham P.S. Case No. 270 of 2010 to the Superintendent of Police, Buxar, and the Superintendent of Police, Buxar, is directed to ensure production of the witnesses on the date so fixed by the Trial Court so that there is no further 2 delay in the trial. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)