IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5148 of 2011 Ram Tahal Singh, son of late Teera Singh, resident of village-Dhawdarh, P.S. Sasaram, District- Rohtas ----- Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Sasaram at Rohtas. 2. The District Magistrate, Sasaram (Rohtas). 3. The Additional Collector, Sasaram (Rohtas) 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sasaram (Rohtas). 5. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms (D.C.L.R.), Sasaram , Rohtas. 6. The Circle Officer, Sasaram, Rohtas. 7. The Block Development Officer, Sasaram, Rohtas (Hauhatta Block) 8. Executive Engineer, Rural Work Department Work Division-2, Rohtas, Sasaram --------- Respondents. ---------- 4. 10.5.2011 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Heard Mr. Shyam Kishore Sharma, learned Government Advocate No.3. We have also given indulgence of hearing to Mr. Rajan Ghosharve who seeks permission to appear on behalf of the intervenor Mukhiya of Dhawdarh Panchayat which may be impleaded as party respondent. The Dhawdarh Panchayat through its Mukhiya is impleaded as respondent no.9 in the interest of justice. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition in the nature of public interest litigation seeks a direction to construct Panchayat building at 2 Dhawdarh, rather than Chitanwanpur. Learned counsel for the newly-added respondent submits that the Panchayat Bhawan is really being built at Dhawdarh, and not at Chitanwanpur which is a tola in this Panchayat. It thus appears that the writ petition is without any basis, and does not disclose any cause of action. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar,J. ) ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)