-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6713 OF 2005 IN CRI.APPEAL NO. 958 OF 2005 Vicky Ratilal Parmar ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.V.V.Purwant Advocate for Applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : OCTOBER 24, 2005 DATE : OCTOBER 24, 2005 DATE : OCTOBER 24, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail. The applicant has been convicted under Section 394 of IPC and sentenced to R.I. for three years. It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that the applicant was on bail pending trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. This statement is not controverted on behalf of the prosecution. -2- The learned advocate for the applicant on instructions states that the applicant is not involved in any other case. It is further submitted that the appeal preferred by the applicant is not likely to be heard within the period of three years, hence, the applicant be released on bail. Looking to the above facts and the evidence on record, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. 3. The applicant-Vicky Ratilal Parmar to be released on bail of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties to make up that amount. During the pendency of the appeal, the applicant shall report on every Sunday to Andheri Police Station. 4. Application is disposed of. [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]