IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.6374 of 2002 Between: Panniswamy, S/o.Tukaram Doulaw, R/o.29-14 Neerdmet, Malkajgiri, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Srinath Reddy, Station House Officer, Neeredimat P.S., Malkajgiri Mandal & Municipality, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Station House Officer, Neeredimet P.S., Malkajgiri Mandal & Municipality, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Divisional Superintendent of Police, Malkajgiri, Ranga Reddy District. 4 The Superintendent of Police, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. Ranga Reddy District. 5 The Director General of Police, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. Ranga Reddy District. 6 A.Sanjeeva Reddy, R/o.Plot No:20, 19-79/20, Ayodhya Colony, ECIL Post, Hyderabad-500062. 7 Jayasheela Devi, W/o.Sanjeeva Reddy, R/o.Plot No:20, 19-79/20, Ayodhya Colony, ECIL Post, Hyderabad-500062. 8 Sattaiah, The Incharge Station House Officer, (on 31-3-2002 night) Neeredimet P.S., Malkajgiri Mandal & Municipality, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in Nature of Writ of Mandamus set aside the notice of the 2nd respondent issued on 3.4.2002 purport to have been sent U/s.91 of Cr.P.C., calling for documents pertaining to the petitioners plot, after declring the action of the respondent in not booking the case under proper provision, by receiving the continuation complaint on 1.4.2002, as illegal, arbitrary and against Principles of Law, and consequently direct the Respondent No.1,2 & 8 not to interfere with reconstruction of the demolished shop, room and compound wall direct the Respondent No:1, 2 & 8 to book Criminal Case/modify provisions of Sections in Cr.NO.80/2002, on the file of 2nd respondent, including case under A.P.SC & ST(Prevention of ) Atrocities Act 1989, by receiving the continuation compliant on 1.4.2002 as illegal, arbitrary, and against Principles of Law, and consequently direct the respondent No.1,2 & 8 not to interfer with reconstruction of the demolished shop, room & compound wall reconstruction of the demolished their illegal activities and direct recovery of the property worth Rs.1,43,2590/- taken away by the respondent No.6 & his henchmen, in the interest of Justice3 and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.SUDHAKAR REDDY & NEERAJA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TML} THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.6374 of 2002 O R D E R: When the matter was taken up for hearing on 9.04.2008 none appeared for the petitioner and it was posted to 16.04.2008, and on 16.04.2008 also none appeared for the petitioner when the matter is called and hence the matter is directed to be listed today under caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today also, when the matter is called, none appears for the petitioner either in the morning session or in the evening session. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 23.04.2008 Dsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Station House Officer, Neeredimet P.S., Malkajgiri Mandal & Municipality, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Divisional Superintendent of Police, Malkajgiri, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Superintendent of Police, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. Ranga Reddy District. 4 The Director General of Police, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. Ranga Reddy District. 5.2CCs to 6.2CD copies