1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.789 OF 2004 Union of India & anr. ..Petitioners. Vs. Diwan Singh Puri ..Respondent. ... Mrs. N.V. Masurkar i/b Vinay S. Masurkar for the Petitioners. Mr. Ramesh Ramamurthy i/b Saikumar Ramamurthy for the Respondent. .... CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J.& DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J, 27h August, 2004. P.C. : 1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 13th October, 2003 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, Mumbai. In the order, the Tribunal directed the authorities to reconsider the matter as regards the imposition of punishment in the light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in State of U.P v. Raj Pal Singh (2002(2) SC SLJ 60) and also keeping in view the quantum of punishment imposed against the other officers who were charged with same delinquency along with 2 the petitioner. We find no infirmity in the order. This petition, being totally devoid of any merit, is dismissed. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that time for implementation of the order be granted. We direct that the order be implemented within two months from today. CHIEF JUSTICE DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.