1 6 caf.3808.11 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3808 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 399 OF 2011 1(a) Farida Abubakar Memon and others. ... Applicants Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. ... Respondent ----- Mr. S.M.Gorwadkar i/b Khilnani and Company for the Applicants. Mr. N.V.Walawalkar, Senior Counsel, a/w Mr. Vinod Mahadik for the Respondent / BMC. ----- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 07 th September, 2011. P.C. . Not on board. Taken on board. 2 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3 The learned senior counsel appearing for the Respondent opposes the application. 4 The prayer in this application is for extension of ad-interim relief till the disposal of the appeal preferred by the Applicants under Section 47 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. 2 6 caf.3808.11 The grievance made in the application appears to be that though the appeal is preferred by the Applicants before the State Government, there is no order passed on the prayer for interim relief. In fact, the remedy of the Applicants is to file appropriate proceedings seeking appropriate relief against the State Government. 5 The ad-interim relief granted by this Court is to operate for a period of twelve weeks from 16 th June, 2011. 6 To enable the Applicants to take appropriate steps, it is directed that the ad-interim relief granted earlier will continue to operate till 30 th September, 2011. Application is disposed of. [ A.S.OKA, J ]