IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16526 of 2011 RAJA SAH @ RAJA SAHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 25.5.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Miscreants entered informant’s house, could not succeed to commit theft but later it revealed that one Mobile was stolen, recovered from one Singhania, its print out shows talk by petitioner also. I find no substance in the submission advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner that the person from whom Mobile was recovered and six others used the Mobile set are not made accused, certainly not an appreciable act of the I.O. but may not minimize the liability of the petitioner. Taking the facts into consideration, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)