IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29240 of 2009 1. CHAMPA DEVI, wife of Udan Das 2. Dahu Das, son of Udan Das 3. Sheo Dulari Devi, wife of Bharos Das 4. Shanti Devi, wife of Dahu Das All serial nos.1 to 4 are residents of village-Bahurar, P.S.-Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi----------------------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that they have no concern in any way with disappearance of the victim if it was kidnapping. Though they(petitioners) have been named in the F.I.R., the victim appeared and made statement under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ignoring all the accused persons including this petitioner but making specific allegation that it was co-accused Suman Kumar Das who took her to Delhi and kept there for two months. But something is hidden due to influence of her family members that about her very consent and cooperation to follow Suman Kumar Das to Delhi. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Pupri, Sitamarhi, in connection with Nanpur P.S. case no.33 of 2009 , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )