IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No.2001 of 2007. Date of decision: 12.03.2010. State of H.P. & Another …Petitioners Versus Shri Jagbir Singh …Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Dev Darshan Sud,J. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kuldip Singh,J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr.P.K. Sharma, Additional Advocate General with Mr.P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. For the Respondent: None. Per Dev Darshan Sud,J.(Oral). This writ petition has become infructuous. The grounds urged do not survive for adjudication. It is undisputed that after the respondent was granted work charged status, his services have been regularized. In these circumstances, the ratio of the judgment in Secretary, State of Karnataka and Others vs. Uma Devi (3) and Others, (2006)4 SCC 1, is not applicable in the present case. It is not the case of the State that such regularization has been made 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 contrary to the Recruitment and Promotions Rules. This writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. All interim orders are vacated. All miscellaneous applications are disposed of. (Dev Darshan Sud) Judge. March 12, 2010 (Kuldip Singh) (aks) Judge.