1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5623 OF 2009 Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd., Mumbai Regional Office at Plot No.180, Vasant Nagar, Nanded Through its Managing Director/ Grade I Officer, M.S.C.Bank, Nanded, Nanded Pay Office .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Hon’ble Cabinet Minister for Co-operation, Marketing and Textile, Mantralaya, Mumbai 2. The Liquidator/District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Oil Industries Ltd., Latur, Taluka and District Latur 3. The Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Latur, Tq. and Dist.Latur .. Respondents Shri P.S.Dighe, Advocate holding for Shri V.R.Dhorde, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.V.Kurundkar, Addl.Government Pleader for respondents CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ DATE : 26th August 2009 2 ORAL JUDGMENT [ PER P.V.HARDAS , J ] 1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties these petitions are heard finally at the stage of admission. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader Shri S.V.Kurundkar accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 3. The petitioner, by this petition prays for directing respondent No.1 to decide the pending revision which had been filed some time in April 2009. In the light of the limited nature of relief which is prayed for in this petition, we deem it appropriate to decide this petition finally at this stage. 3. Since the revision is pending since April 2009, we are inclined to allow this petition and direct respondent No.1 to expeditiously decide the said revision and as far as possible within six months from the date of communication of this order. The petitioner, obviously would be at liberty to urge before respondent No.1 any application seeking interim relief, if the same is maintainable. 3 4. Rule is thus made absolute on the above terms with no orders as to costs. ( A.V.POTDAR ) ( P.V.HARDAS ) JUDGE JUDGE vvr/5623.09wp 4 WRIT PETITION NO.5623 OF 2009 Date of decision : 26th August 2009 For approval and signature THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE P.V. HARDAS THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE A.V. POTDAR 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers } may be allowed to see the judgment? } Yes. 2. To be referred to the Reorter or not? } Yes/No 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment? } No. 4. Whether this case involves a substantial } question of law as to the interpretation } of the Constitution of India, 1950 or } any Order made thereunder? } No. 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the } Civil Judges? } No. 6. Whether the case involves an important } question of law and whether a copy of } the judgment should be sent to Mumbai, } Nagpur and Panaji offices? } No. [ V.V.RASAL] Personal Assistant to the Honourable Judge