1 fca-55-10 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 93 OF 2010 Aruna Nabh .. Petitioner Vs. Raj Kanwal Nabh .. Respondent Ms. Sumangala for appellant. Ms. Amarjit Kaur for respondent. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U. D. SALVI, JJ. DECEMBER 21, 2010. P.C. 1. In our last order dated 22/11/2010, we had recorded the settlement between the parties and reduced in writing in the form of “Consent Terms”. The settlement has been signed by both the parties on 25/10/2010 and so as to comply with the terms of the said settlement, the respondent was granted some time, and today the documents placed before us indicate that a Demand Draft in the sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) drawn in favour of the Registrar, Appellate Side, High Court, Bombay has been deposited on 14/12/2010. 2 fca-55-10 2. The marriage between the parties has already been dissolved by consent and the grievance in this appeal was limited to the issue of maintenance and the same has been settled. 3. Hence, the appeal is allowed in terms of the Consent Terms dated 25/10/2010 and marked as “X” for identification. 4. The Registry is directed to issue a fresh decree accordingly. The amount deposited, i.e. Rs.10 lakhs, is allowed to be withdrawn by Nikita Nabh, provided the said amount is invested in fixed deposit with a nationalized bank and the deposit receipt shall be deposited with the Registrar (Judicial) of this court, with a photostat copy to be kept with her, until further orders. 5. Civil Application No. 93 of 2010 does not survive and stands disposed as such. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.) 3 fca-55-10