C.R. No.2448 of 2004 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.2448 of 2004 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.08.2009 Ashok Kumar Sangwan .....Petitioner Versus Shri Baba Mastnath Ayurvedic and Sanskrit Sansthan Trust and others ....Respondents Present: Mr. R.S. Tacoria, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondents. 2. C.W.P. No.3246 of 2004 Maharishi Dayanand University .....Petitioner Versus Shri Baba Mastnath Ayurvedic Degree College and others ....Respondents Present: Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1. Civil Revisions No.2448 and 3246 of 2004 arise against the same order passed by the Additional District Judge, Rohtak dated 04.05.2004. By the impugned order, the Appellate Court had set aside the order passed in an interlocutory application permitting the C.R. No.2448 of 2004 (O&M) -2- University to issue a Migration Certificate for a student who sought for a transfer from one college to another. The impugned order came to be passed at the instance of the college, which objected to the issuance of the Migration Certificate by the University without concurrence from the college. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the student submits that during the stage of the civil revision, this Hon'ble Court had passed an order dated 20.11.2004 permitting the student to join the transferee college and complete his course. Accordingly he has taken the examination and the issue whether the Migration Certificate could have been granted or not has no longer any relevance. 3. Even without going into the merits of the case, in view of the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner, I find that no further orders are necessary. Both the civil revisions are disposed of on the basis of a subsequent event that is reported to have taken place in the matter indicated above. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 07, 2009 Pankaj*