IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17225 of 2011 Shiv Chandra Prasad Singh, son of late Baidyanath Singh, Resident of village Bhaluahi, P.O. Nayagaon, P.S. Sheohar, District Sheohar. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Treasury Officer, Sheohar, District Sheohar. 3. The State Bank of India through the General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna. 4. The Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna. 5. The Deputy General Manager, State Bank of India, Central Pension Processing Centre, Judges Court Road, Anta Ghat, Patna. 6. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Sheohar Branch, District Sheohar. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 3. 14.10.2011. Heard Shri Vijay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Suresh Sharma, learned A.C. to G.P.16, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2 and Shri Mukund Jee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.3 to 6/State Bank of India. The present writ petition was filed with a prayer to direct the respondent/Bank to make payment of retiral dues in view of pension payment order issued by the office of Accountant General. Shri Mukund Jee, learned counsel for the respondent/Bank, on instruction, informs the court that as per the PPO issued by the 2 Accountant General, amount has already been transmitted to the account of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the fact, but submits that there is some discrepancy in the D.A. portion. In view of the fact that as per the PPO issued by the Accountant General, the amount has been transmitted to the account of the petitioner, the court is of the opinion that no purpose will be served in further keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a representation indicating therein discrepancy in respect of amount of D.A. before respondent no.4/Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Patna within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.4 is required to examine the same and if he considers that there is some discrepancy, he will correct the same within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. It is indicated that while filing representation 3 before respondent no.4, the petitioner may also serve a copy of the same to the Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Sheohar Branch. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)