IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1807 of 2009 Bhagwan Yadav, son of late Lakhan Yadav, resident of village- Chatrubhujwa, Bettiah, P.S.-Shikarpur, District- West Champaran, Bettiah. ……..Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Gaya Sharma, son of late Laxmi Sharma. 3. Surendra Sharma, son of Gaya Sharma. 4. Bharat Sharma, son of late Laxmi Sharma. 5. Suman Sharma @Sughun Sharma, son of late Laxmi Sharma. 6. Jai Narayan Sharma, son of late Laxmi Sharma. (All are residents of village- Chatrubhujwa, Bettiah, P.S.-Shikarpur, District- West Champaran, Bettiah) ……..Opposite Parties ---------------------------------- 3. 12.12.2011 The informant petitioner has preferred this revision application against the judgment and order dated 17.08.2009 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, West Champaran, Bettiah in Sessions Trial No.299/2007 by which the accused opposite party nos.2 to 6 have been acquitted. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. While passing the order of acquittal through his judgment dated 17.08.2009, the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, West Champaran, Bettiah has discussed the evidence produced on behalf of both the parties. 2 After having heard the learned counsel for both the sides and after going through the judgment, I find that the view taken by the learned Trial Judge was the probable view and in that light, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)