:1: chandka IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 518 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 518 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 518 OF 2007 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2920 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2920 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2920 OF 2007 The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant versus Ananda S. Bhosale & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. A. S. Shitole for the Applicant - State. CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATE : 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. DATE : 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. DATE : 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard Mr. Shitole, learned APP for the Applicant - State. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay caused in filing Criminal Application No. 2920 of 2007 seeking leave to file appeal against the order of acquittal. 3. However, I noticed that the impugned order of acquittal is passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Wai, Dist: Satara, and the :2: chandka accused were tried for offences punishable under sections 341, 325, 323, 504, 427 of the IPC. 4. Hence, the Registrar (Judicial) is directed to transfer these applications to the Sessions Court concerned, in view of the amended provisions of Section 378(1) of the Cr.P.C. (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)