IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2011 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 11928 of 2011(M) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- GEETHA.V.K,W/O.RAJU,AGED 50 YEARS, 'VAZHAKKALAYIL HOUSE',P.O.KOLANI,THODUPUZHA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 'NELLICHOTTIL HOUSE', PURAPUZHA.P.O,THODUPUZHA. BY ADVS. SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN SMT.P.G.BABITHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. THE INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT,(IHRD),PROJOE TOWERS,VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. R1 BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE R2 BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHANDAS, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 11928/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND RESPONDENT 01/02/2001. P2: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 23/08/2001. P3: COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. P4: COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 26/02/2009 IN WPC.4838/2009. P5: COPY OF THE ADMISSION TICKET ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. P6: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC. NO.10380/2010 AND CONNECTED CASES. P7: COPY OF THE LIST PREPARED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT. P8: COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONMDENT. P9: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs s T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 11928 of 2011-M - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 13th day of June, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner is a part time sweeper in the College of Applied Sciences at Thodupuzha, which is managed by the second respondent. the main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the second respondent to consider Ext.P9 representation along with other representations received pursuant to the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court and to consider the same and regularise the services of the petitioner. 2. It is pointed out that the petitioner was appointed on 7.2.2001 and was continued to be engaged till 14.11.2006 and after the said period there was a short break and subsequently she was recalled and even now continuing as a part time sweeper. Pursuant to Ext.P3 notification, even thought the petitioner submitted an application, that was not accepted and the same was the subject matter of W.P.(C) No.4838/2009 wherein an interim order was passed, a copy of which is produced as Ext.P4. It is pointed out that thereafter she appeared for the test and the selection process was under challenge before this Court in various writ petitions and finally the writ appeals were disposed of by a Division Bench of this Court. wpc 11928/2011 2 It is further pointed out that in the light of the direction issued by the Division Bench, some of the persons who had five years service, had been regularised and the petitioner is also seeking an identical relief. 3. Heard learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent. It is pointed out that in similar writ petitions, the Division Bench has only directed the second respondent to consider the applications of similarly placed persons. My attention was drawn to the judgment in W.A. No.1613/2010 and connected cases. Therein, the petitioners are directed to submit their representations before the Director of the second respondent herein, within seven days and a further direction was issued to the Director to take a decision expeditiously. 4. Herein, the copy of the representation filed by the petitioner is Ext.P9 and learned Standing Counsel submitted that the same will be considered in accordance with law after taking into account various aspects. It is also pointed out that representations of similarly placed candidates are still pending. 5. Therefore, I am not expressing anything on the merits of the matter. The second respondent will consider Ext.P9 and pass orders along wpc 11928/2011 3 with the claims of other similarly placed candidates in accordance with law, and the same will be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/