1 Review petition no. 19 of 2011 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE REVIEW PETITION NO. 19 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1896 OF 2005 Sohansingh Mansingh Purohit ... Petitioner Versus Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation... Respondents Mr. Prathamesh Gokhale holding for Advocate Ambar Joshi for Petitioner. CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J. DATED : MARCH 25, 2011 P.C. This review petition seeks review of the order dated 29th September, 2010. Mr.Gokhale, the learned counsel for the review petitioner states that the only reason for filing the review petition is statement made by the counsel for the original petitioner and the respondent to the review petition on 29th September, 2010 which statement is recorded in the order. The counsel had made a statement that the heirs of deceased 2 Review petition no. 19 of 2011 respondent no. 1 to the petition had already been brought on record in original proceedings i.e. Regular Civil Suit No.466 of 2010. The learned counsel states that the statement is factually incorrect and that the heirs are yet to be brought on record in the original proceedings. He states that there is not even an application made before the trial court for the purpose. Even if that is so, there is no question of reviewing the order dated 29th September, 2010. It is because the order merely records statement made by the counsel for the original petitioner. Hence, review petition is dismissed. [Judge]