C0) 1m 2/ §W$$§E §§L£x§ir% @ BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILAsPUR (C0,) WM WRIT PETHION (C) No. /2009 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ETITIONER Chain Raj {gavozfq Li/ son of La’re Rongl<3l Bardiya, Aged about 55 yeors R/o Suyoj Bordiyo Niwos C/181 , Tigor Nogor, Roipur (CG) VERSUS ESPONDEN Sto’fe of ChhoHisgorh /]. Through — Secretory L< Department of Revenue, Dou Koly'on Singh Bhowon Roipur (CG) /2. ColleCTor, Roipur (C.G.) Roipur Developmem‘ Authority Through — Choirmon‘ R.D.A. Office, Roipur (CG) / 4. Grom Ponchoyot - Devpuri Through — Sorp‘onch, Block — Dho’rsivo, Roipur (CG) O) PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER As per couse title of the petition. 4 P / RTS F€ESF~GNDENTS , State of {Ehha‘z‘ESQarh & Gmei's {Wfi€ Peikicin undy Artide 22$ of ihe Canstiiution of imia) Sa Fwsam :— $hr§ T.K.Ti\avari, Advesaie for ihg petitisneai $§*:r§ Arun Sac: Govt Advocate far the State. $§ngi& Bench : Hw’aie S‘W Shr; $umesh Eajaj Rdvocate for f‘ne yespehdem No.3. QRSER (Passe§ 0n ihis 3? 5‘ day 0?" (Betcha; 26’s? z \, ; (Saw; t9 wi€hdraw ‘E’ni5 9eii§m r—x— P) ’3. "' V) 1. Lgag'ned munsef awewmg r2! “%‘a peiitianer $eek$ pemqisiicm 01‘ ws 0n €he g’suné thai as poin‘ted av: by h$ Séaie, sinca he §cqui$%tiaa wawedmg has been iné‘iiated, the §evr§t§m hag becema academ§£ at ih§s siage. \§Q abiact§sa rcm aiher side. gr :$ cm‘emd a3 grayed for‘ Qcwrt§ing§§a ihe writ peiii‘ion i3 di$missed as Vxiiihdi'awn. / Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge t' ‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : B§LASPUR WRIT PETiTlON (C) NO. 7419 ‘OF 2009 PET!TIONER Chain Raj Bardia Versus ESPONDENTS . State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petitian under Article 226 of the Constitutian of lndia) Singie Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri T.K.Tiwari, Advosate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Advecate for the respondent No.3. ORDER (Passed on this 31 5‘ day of October, 201 1) 1. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition on the ground that as pointed out by the State, since no acquisition proceeding has been initiated, the petition has become academic at this stage. No objection from other side. it is ordered as prayed for. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sdl- Judge Satish K. Agnihotrii am“te R