@ WRIT PETITlpN (S) No.6601l2011 PETITIONER Jogiram Dhruv, aged about 47 years, son of Ramratan Dhruv, at present working as a Upper Division Teacher, Government Middle School, Karpawand, Bakawand, Jagdaipur, District Basiar (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Department, Raipur, t District Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Bastar, at Jagdatpur,District Bastar (C.G.) 3 The District Education Officer, Bastar at Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) 4 Assistant Education Officer, Bakawand, District Bastar (C.G.) A WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA Appearance : Mr. Vishnu Koshta, Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Prasun Bhaduri, Panei Lawyer forthe respondents. ORAL ORDER (11.11.2011) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on admission. The petitioner is working on the post of Upper Division Teacher. He is also incharge Principal. By the impugned order WRIT PETITION (S) NO.6601I2011 dated 15.072011, he has been transferred from Middle School, Karpawand, Bakawand to Middle Schooi, Aalor, Farasgaon on administrative grounds. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made representations against the order of his transfer vide Annexure P/3 and P/4, but the same have not been decided. The petitioner is posted in Karpawand since last 2 years, as stated by learned counsel for the petitioner, and he has been transferred on administrative grounds. lt is a general transfer order, which has been issued for as many as 37 persons. lt has not been disputed that the petitioner is holding a transferable post. Transfer is an incidence of service, no person working on a transferable post can make his claim for posting at a particular place. lt is for the employer to see as to who should be posted at which place, keeping in mind the better functioning of the department as also the public interest. Unless the order of transfer is shown to be vitiated by malafides or extraneous considerations or it is shown to be passed against any statutory Rule or the Act, normaily such orders are not to be interfered by a Court of law, is the settled view of the Apex Court in many cases. in view of the above, l do not find any good ground to ~ interfere in the impugned order of transfer of the petitioner. The writ petition, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily However, the petitioner wouid be at liberty to pursue his representations earlier made by him. l Sd/— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge W , shyna