IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24606 of 2010 AJEET KUMAR SON OF RAM PRAKASH SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BIHAT ( Makashashpur) P.S. Barauni, District Begusarai --- petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR—Opp. Party. ----------- 2/ 02-08-2010 Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution for offence under section 379 of the Indian Penal Code regarding theft of Bolero vehicle, the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. as accused. It is submitted that the stolen vehicle has not been recovered till date. It is also submitted that the petitioner has not been put on T.I.Parade as yet. The only material against the petitioner is that he has been named by one co-accused during the course of investigation but that accused Ghutar Ram has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court which has been noticed in the order dated 23.02.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No.4706 of 2010 granting bail to yet another accused Tenni Paswan @ Dharmendra Paswan. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 03.06.2010 and there is no other criminal case pending against him, except the present one. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Lakhisarai in connection with Surajgarha P.S. Case No. 363 of 2008, subject to conditions that : (A) one of the bailors must be government servant, (B) another bailor shall be a close family member or the relation of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner, (C) if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/ prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned and (D) the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive 3 dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. BTiwary ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J)