WP(C) 5573/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr AK Hussain, learned counsel for petitioner; as well as Mr P. Ro y, learned state counsel, appearing for the respondent nos.1 to 5. Petitioner by the present petition has prayed for a direction to state r espondents, namely respondent nos.1 to 5 not to select private respondent nos.6 to 8 for rendering voluntary service as Anganwadi Worker & Anganwadi Helper in J annatpur N.C. Centre under Matia ICDS Project and to select candidates who are t he residents of Baladmari Char village falling within the Centre. According to p etitioner, since the respondent nos.6 to 8 do not belong to the village Baladmar i Char, they are not entitled to be interviewed, either for Anganwadi Worker or for Anganwadi Helper, as on that ground, their applications were required to be summarily rejected in view of guidelines issued for that purpose, but the author ity had decided to call the said respondents to appear in the interview held on 18.9.09. According to petitioner, pursuant to the said interview held, no select list has been prepared or published as yet. It may happen that respondent nos.6 to 8 are not selected and the petitioner is selected. The grievance of the petitioner at this stage without publication of select list cannot be scrutinized. In the eve nt the select list is published and the petitioner is not selected or the respon dent nos.6 to 8 are selected, it is open to the petitioner to challenge such sel ection on the grounds taken in the present writ petition. The writ petition file d by the petitioner is premature and hence, dismissed. The writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.