- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7327 OF 2007 ... Shaikh Shaukt Ali Mohammad Ali ..Petitioner v/s. Union of India & 4 ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.Niyaz Ahmed for the Petitioner. Mr.R.V.Govilkar with Ms.Rituja Ambekar for Respondents. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & V.M.KANADE, JJ. DATED: 9TH JANUARY, 2008 P.C.: 1. The order imposing punishment on the Petitioner was passed in the year 2000. Feeling aggrieved by that order he filed an appeal before the Deputy Inspector General, Central Industrial Securities - 2 - Force (SZ). That appeal was dismissed by order dated 16th March, 2001. The period of limitation for filing revision against that order is six months. But the revision was filed on 12-7-2006. No application for condonation of delay was made. The Revisional Authority by order dated 10-11-2006 rejected the revision as barred by law of limitation. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that this court should condone the delay in filing the revision and the revisional authority should be directed to consider the revision application on merits. 3. In our opinion, it would not be proper for this court to condone the delay in filing the revision and to direct the revisional authority to consider the revision on merits. It was for the Petitioner to file an application for condonation of delay along with proper documents and having not done so the Petitioner cannot ask this court to do that. There is no substance in the petition. Petition is rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) - 3 - (V.M.KANADE, J.)