Crl. Misc. No. M-12928 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-12928 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.7.2010 Sonia Pushkaran and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Ms. Upasana Dhawan, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, Deputy Advocate General Haryana. Rajan Gupta, J. (oral) Learned State counsel (on the instructions from S.I. Rajpal Singh, who is present in court) submits that the petitioners no longer require security as parents of petitioner No.1 (respondents No.4 and 5) have reconciled the matter. This contention has not been opposed by the learned counsel for the petitioners. She submits that in view of this, the petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of above, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 16.7.2010 'rajpal'