IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT TUESDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2008 / 14TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 7514 of 2008(T) ------------------------- CP.84/2007 of J.M.F.C.-I, KOLLAM .................... PETITIONER: ------------ LOY ROZARIO ALIAS LOY LAMBERT, ROZARIO'S HOUSE, NAMED AS LIJI LAND, NEAR KEEKKOLI MUKKU, KUREEPUZHACHERI P.O., THRIKKADAVOOR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.SHEEJO CHACKO SRI.M.N.MANOJ RESPONDENTS: ------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.GIKKU JACOB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 7514 OF 2008 T ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 4th day of March, 2008 J U D G M E N T The short request of the petitioner is that C.P.84/07 pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Kollam may be disposed of expeditiously. The petitioner's name is included in the PSC rank list. The unnecessary continuance of this proceedings may affect his chance for employment. It is hence that the petitioner wants the case to be disposed of expeditiously. 2. The request of the petitioner does appear to me to be legitimate. The petitioner must have moved the Magistrate at the first instance. Without moving the learned Magistrate, I find no reason or justification in the conduct of the petitioner rushing to this Court with this petition. 3. However, I am satisfied that the petitioner can be given an opportunity to move the learned Magistrate for WPC.7514/08 : 2 : expeditious disposal of his case. The learned Magistrate must consider such application on merits and expeditiously. 4. Hand over copy of this order to the learned counsel for the petitioner for production before the learned Magistrate along with his application. Needless to say, the petitioner can request the learned Magistrate to consider his request in the light of the decision in Kamalaksha Vs. S.I. of Police [2007 (1) KLT 299]. 5. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) aks