IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2515 of 2010 1. MANI KUMARI D/O LATE JAY BALLAV LAL DAS R/O MOH NEW DAMARIYA ,P.O.ANISHABAD,DISTT-PATNA AT PRESENT POSTED AS BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER,KISHANPUR,DISTT-SUPAUL Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. EDUCATION COMMISSIONER BIHAR,PATNA 3. VICE-CHANCELLOR MAGADH UNIVERSITY , BODH GAYA 4. DIRECTOR ,PRIMARY EDUCATION NEW SECRETARIAT,BIHAR,PATNA 5. DIRECTOR DISTANCE EDUCATION DIRECTORIATE MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BODH GAYA 6. DIRECTOR MASS EDUCATION BIHAR,PATNA ----------- 2. 11.03.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel for the State and the learned counsel for the Magadh University. The petitioner desires admission to the Distance Bachelor of Education course in the respondent University for the Session 2009-2011. It is her case that she has been appointed as Block Education Extension Officer in the untrained category subject to the condition that she acquires training qualification within four years and thus her desire for such admission. It is fairly submitted that the University stipulates that before taking admission in a Distance Bachelor of Education course the candidate must have two years of teaching experience which the petitioner does not possess. Nonetheless, the petitioner having qualified in the written examination is entitled to be considered for admission. Counsel for the University rightly submits that condition of eligibility for admission to a course is for the University to decide in accordance with law. A candidate desiring admission is required to fulfil the same. The submission on behalf of the University is unexceptional. The Court cannot re-write the conditions of eligibility for admission to a course. The grievance of the petitioner that she may be deprived of her appointment if she does not secure admission to the course and acquire training, inclusive of any relaxation of the conditions, are matters to be appropriately considered by the respondents themselves in accordance with law. The petitioner is stated to have represented before the Commissioner of Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar. It is for the concerned respondent to take an appropriate decision in the matter in accordance with law. Since the Court is informed by the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner that the session is delayed and the counseling for admission has started in January 2010 only, this Court expects that the Education Commissioner shall act promptly in the matter so that if he be of the opinion that the petitioner is entitled to the relief, mere delay in disposal of the representation may not prejudice the petitioner. This Court expects that such decision in the aforesaid manner shall be taken preferably within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)