IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 15064 of 2008 Between: Smt.P Pushamma W/o.Bikshapathi Manchirevula(V) Rajendranagar(M) R.R District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Hyderabad 2 The Deputy Commissioner G.H.M.C Serilingampally Circle 3 Hyderabad Urban Development Authority at Begumpet Hyderabad 4 Station House Officer P.S Radidurgam Cyberabad R.R District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.1 to 3 in not taking any action and not passing any order on the request of the petitioner dt 18-6-2007 Made through her advocate in respect of Land in Sy.No.116 and 117 admeasuring 3 acres 23 guntas and 1 acre 32 guntas respectively situated at Nanakramguda(V) Sherilingampally(M) R.R District as arbitrary illegal and violative 14,19(1)(g) 21 and 300-A of the constitution of India and consequently direction respondent No.1 to 3 to take action and pass appropriate orders on the request of petitioners dt.18-6-2007 made through her advocate. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.V.RAJEEVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SMT.KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Writ Petition No.15064 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition has been filed by Smt.P.Pushamma with a prayer to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in not considering the representation made by her, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner is the joint owner of the agricultural land situated in Survey Nos.116 and 117 admeasuring Acs.3.23 guntas and Acs.1.32 guants respectively in Nanakramguda village, Sherilingampally Mandal, R.R.District. Since the other sharers refused to come forward for partition, she filed O.S.No.324 of 2005 on the file of II Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, seeking relief of partition and separate possession. The suit is pending trial. When the third parties raised pillars, the petitioner made a representation to the respondents to take action against the third parties, who are making attempts to put up constructions. Since the respondents failed to act on her representation, she invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. When the writ petition came up for admission, Smt.Kalpana Ekbote, learned Standing Counsel for the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, received notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2, Sri M.Dhanamjay Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, received notice on behalf of third respondent and the learned Government Pleader for Home received notice on behalf of fourth respondent. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that some third parties dug pits for raising pillars and the activities of the third parties are required to be put to check by the respondents. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submits that the respondents 1 and 2 did not grant any permission to anyone to put up constructions on the land owned by the petitioner. If such is the situation, it is for the petitioner to approach civil Court restraining the third parties from interfering with her possession. Reserving such liberty, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ____________________ (B.Seshasayana Reddy,J) Dt.24th July, 2008 VGB