IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13677 of 2006 1. PRANAY PRIYAMBAD, SON OF SHRI OM PRKASH SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – KESHOPUR, ROAD NO. 6, P.O. + P.S. JAMALPUR, DISTRICT – MUNGER, BIHAR. 2. RAKESH ROSHAN, SON OF SHRI SHYAMAL KISHORE YADAV, RESIDENT OF B-1/126 YAMUNA BIHAR, P.S. YAMUNA BIHAR, NEW DELHI-53. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. SECRETARY, BIHAR VIDHAN PARISHAD AT BIHAR VIDHAN PARISHAD SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 5. CHAIRMAN, BIHAR VIDHAN PARISHAD AT BIHAR VIDHAN PARISHAD SECRETARIAT, PATNA. ----------- 02. 5.8.2010 The Court has not intentionally expressed any opinion on the question or argument made at the bar against the order of termination passed against the two petitioners, keeping in mind that they have filed a review application against the order of termination and which is pending before the Chairman, Bihar Vidhan Parishad for a long time now. On a specific assurance being given by the counsel representing the Bihar Vidhan Parishad that a final order in review would be passed, the writ application is disposed of with a hope that a final opinion on the review would be expressed within a reasonable time frame as has been stated by the counsel representing the Parishad. If the petitioners are still not satisfied with the outcome of the decision they have remedy under the law. Since 2 the earlier review was filed almost four years ago petitioners are directed to file a copy of the review application afresh along with a copy of this order for consideration. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observation/direction. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)