1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.949 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri A.V. Chatuphale i/by A.A. Salvi for the Petitioner. Shri S.V. Sadavarte for the Respondent. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C.: . Not on board. Taken on board. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. His grievance is that without considering the prayer for grant of ad-interim relief, a Notice of Motion filed by the Petitioner was fixed for hearing and the Trial Court is not hearing the Notice of Motion. The first substantive prayer in the Petition is for grant of ad- interim injunction. The second prayer in the alternative is again for grant of injunction. Such relief cannot be granted in writ jurisdiction when the Notice of Motion is pending. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the trial Court be directed to 2 consider the prayer for ad-interim relief or the Notice of Motion be ordered to be disposed of immediately. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent has produced on record a copy of the order dated 31st December, 2009 which records “therefore, in my view at this stage, no ad-interim relief can be granted.” 4. This order shows that prayer for ad-interim relief has been turned down by the trial Court. Remedy of the Petitioner is to challenge the said order. At this stage, prayer for fixing time bound schedule for disposal of the Notice of Motion cannot be considered. Hence, the Petition cannot be entertained, and subject to what is observed above, the same is rejected. (A.S.OKA,J ash