BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT ORGANIZED BY THE KERALA HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.SHAMSUDDIN (RETD. JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) & SRI.K.N.SATHEESA N(RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE) TUESDAY, THE 30TH JUNE 2009 / 9TH ASHADHA 1931 RSA.No. 748 of 2003() --------------------- AS.53/2001 of SUB COURT, THALASSERY OS.252/1997 of MUNSIFF COURT, THALASSERY .................... APPELLANT (PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT): ------------------------------------------- KUNIYIL KALLAN BALAN, SON OF ACHUTHAN, PUTHIYEDATH HOUSE, P.O. OLAVILAM, CHOKLI AMSOM, OLAVILAM DESOM, THALASSERY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY MR.GEORGE MATHEW,ADVOCATE MR.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE,ADVOCATE RESPONDENTS/(DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS): ------------------------------------------------- 1. KOPPAYIL LEELA, D/O. KANARAN, CHOKLI AMSOM, OLAVILAM DESOM, P.O. OLAVILAM, THALASSERY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. PARAMMEL ACHOOTTY, SON OF CHEKKOTTI, BROKER, CHOKLI AMSOM, OLAVILAM DESOM, P.O. OLAVILAM, THALASSERY TALUK, KANNUR DIST. BY MR.CIBI THOMAS,ADVOCATE FOR R1-2 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR DETERMINATION AT THE LOK ADALAT ON 30/06/2009, AND THE PARTIES HAVING SETTLED THE MATTER, THE FOLLOWING AWARD IS PASSED IN TERMS OF SETTLEMENT: JUSTICE P.K.SHAMSUDDIN (RETD. JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) & SRI.K.N.SATHEESAN (RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE) =========================== R.S.A. No.748 of 2003 =========================== Dated this the 30th day of June, 2009 AWARD Parties and their counsel are present. Parties have settled the mater and pursuant to the terms of settlement a document has been executed by the first respondent in favour of the appellant transferring her right to the appellant in 25 cents of land in survey No.37/1B for an amount of Rs.1,65,000/- (Rupees one lakh sixty five thousand only). The document was produced before the Adalat for perusal. There was some confusion regarding the western boundary of the property which has been shown in the document as three feet byline(idavazhi). It was pointed out by the respondent and her counsel that in the previous document the western boundary was shown only as idavazhi and if the width of the idavazhi is shown as three feet it will make confusion. On behalf of the appellant it was submitted that the width was mentioned only for the purpose of registration. Parties agreed to correct the R.S.A.No.748/2003 2 western boundary only as byline(idavazhi) for the purpose of registration. However, if the Registration Department insists that the width that is mentioned in the document produced is necessary for the purpose of registration, the same may be retained. Parties have produced a copy of the document before the Adalat. Copy of the document will form part of the Award. Parties have signed the document before the Adalat. It was agreed that the document will be produced before the Registration Office for registration on 2.07.2009. In the above terms the entire disputes between the parties are settled. R.S.A. is disposed of as settled accordingly. P.K.SHAMSUDDIN (RETD. JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) K.N.SATHEESAN (RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE) dvs