IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 22960 of 2008 Between: 1.D.Parameswara, S/o. D.Chennakesavulu, R/o. H.No.8/274, Patel Road, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District. 2.C.L.N.Lakshmi Narasimham, S/o. C.L.Sundarsam, R/o. H.No.1-3-704, Somanatha Nagar, Near Ramalayam, Ananthapur,Ananthapur District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Registrar, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 2 The Director, School of Continuing and Distance Education, J.N.T.U., Masab Tank, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not allowing the petitioners to appear for B.Tech (CCC) IV year on the ground that the petitioners did not complete the course within prescribed period and they have less than prescribed credits in their name as arbitrary, illegal and unjust and consequently direct the respondents herein to extend the duration of programme to enable the petitioners to secure required maximum 200 credits out of 228 credits. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.V.PRATAP REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA Writ Petition No.22960 of 2008 ORDER: This Court by an order, dated 21.10.2008¸ directed the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 24.04.2008, and pass appropriate orders within a period of two weeks. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents produced a copy of the order, dated 27.11.2008, rejecting the plea of the petitioner. In that view of the matter, no orders can be passed in this writ petition. If the petitioner has any grievance, he may have to challenge the said order, dated 27.11.2008. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. _______________________ Gopala Krishna Tamada, J Dt.02.12.2008. VGB