IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2010 / 8TH ASHADHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 546 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.29882/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- SUNEESH.T.S, S/O.SUKUMARAN, AGED 28 YEARS, RESIDING AT THURUTHEL HOUSE, EDANADU.P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN SRI.BABY MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. M.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, KOTTAYAM. 2. JAYACHANDRAN, THE SECRETARY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, PALA MAIN BRANCH, PALA. ADV.SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J. ------------------------------------- Cont.Case(C)No.546 of 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T ---------------------- 1. Allegation is that the respondents have failed to comply with the direction in Annexure-I Judgment, to the extent that they have failed in considering waiver of interest/penal interest and expenses. Further it is alleged that, inspite of payment of Rs.75,000/- before 15.1.2010, as stipulated in the judgment the respondents have failed to intimate the petitioner about the net balance payable, after adjusting all payments and after considering waiver as directed. 2. Counsel for respondents produced a copy of the letter sent by the Bank to the petitioner, on 17.4.2010, in compliance with the direction. Through the said statement the Bank had permitted the petitioner to make payment of the balance amount in 4 equal monthly installments starting from 15.5.2010 onwards. COC.546/10 -2- 3. In view of the fact that a statement has already been supplied and time for making payment of the balance amount has been relaxed, I am of the view that the respondents could not be held liable for any contempt, eventhough there occurred some delay in issuing the balance statement, due to which the petitioner has not been put to any prejudice. In the result the Contempt Case is hereby closed. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. okb