Crl. Misc. No. M-25744 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-25744 of 2010 Date of Decision: October 27, 2010 Nazar Singh and others ........Petitioners Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent ****** CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present : Mr. Hukamit Singh, Advocate for Mr. J.S. Bhandohal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Mr. N.S. Tiwana, Advocate, for the complainant. SABINA, J. Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.167 dated 9.8.2010, under Sections 452/447/511/323/427/148/149 of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Mandi Gobindgarh, District Fatehgarh Sahib. At the time of issuance of notice of motion on 1.9.2010, the following order was passed by this Court :- "Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that all the offences are bailable except Section 452 IPC and the alleged occurrence took place within Lal Lakir of the village and the complainant party had tried to encroach upon the Crl. Misc. No. M-25744 of 2010 2 same. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners have not caused any injury to anybody rather the accused party received injuries and are ready to join the investigation. Notice of motion for 27.10.2010. In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on interim anticipatory bail to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. They shall join the investigation as and when required by the Investigating Officer. They shall also comply with the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which are as under :- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer; (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.” Learned State counsel, who is assisted by H.C. Jaswant Singh, has submitted that in terms of the above order the petitioners have joined investigation. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the interim bail granted by this Court on 1.9.2010 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. (SABINA) October 27, 2010 JUDGE Anand