IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.18355 of 2007 Between: 1 K. Brahmanandam S/o. K. Daniel Ayyapurajugudem, W.G. District. 2 K. Mishak S/o. Kalyanam, Sagipadu, W.G. District. 3 K. Yesuratnam S/o. Samuel Mulagalampadu, W.G. District. 4 B. Somamma D/o. Peda Bhushanam Pothavaram. 5 K. Samrajyam S/o.K. Kantnayya Asannagudem 6 E.Jayamani D/o. E. Amanullah Buttayagudem. 7 M. Sudarsana Rao S/o. Veeraswamy Gangavaram, W.G. District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Educational Officer, West Godavari District, Eluru. 2 Church of South India, U.P. Elementary Schools, Rep. by its Manager, Gopalreddy Road, Vijayawada, Krishna District, .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue order or orders of direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the arrears of salaries and regular salaries to the petitioners as illegal, and arbitrary and consequentially direct the respondents to pay arrears of salaries of Rs.9,11,703/- each and continue to pay future salaries to the petitioners and to pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioners: SMT.K.SHYAMALATHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.2: MR. M. SRINIVAS REDDY The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU Writ Petition No.18355 of 2007 ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled questioning the action of the respondents in not paying regular salaries to the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners, submitting that pursuant to the interim order dated 01.10.2007 passed in W.P.M.P.No.23559 of 2007, the respondents have considered the case of the petitioners and passed orders on 10.12.2007 rejecting their claim, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition to enable the petitioners to challenge the said order passed by the respondent authorities. In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, leaving liberty to the petitioners to workout their remedies as available under the law. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 1st September, 2008. IBL