IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition P.I.L. No. 95 of 2011 Deepak Singhal. ………. Petitioner Versus Union of India & others. ..………. Respondents Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Seema Sah, Standing Counsel (Central Govt.) for respondent No. 1. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent Nos. 2 to 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J. BARIN GHOSH, C. J. (Oral) Cure of hemophilia, as has been highlighted in this writ petition, is not easily available. For that, one has to spend a lot of money. There are many poor people, who cannot afford treatment of hemophilia. The present writ petition seeks a direction for arranging treatment of people suffering from hemophilia at the cost of the State. It has not been indicated in the petition from where the cost of such treatment will come. We can only make a request to the State to look into the matter, but cannot issue a direction upon the State to incur such cost. 2. We, accordingly, dispose of the writ petition by making a request to the State to look into the matter and to do the needful in its wisdom. (U.C. Dhyani, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C. J.) 20.12.2011 20.12.2011 G