IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.38940 OF 2009 PHOOL KUMARI, WIFE OF LAKHINDER PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHANTH MANIARI, POLICE STATION MANIARI, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ********** 2 24/12/2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case under Sections 420, 469 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was granted regular bail. After cognizance, summons was issued to the petitioner and bailable warrant of arrest was also issued. It is alleged that without any service report, non-bailable warrant of arrest was issued canceling the bail bonds of the petitioner. The petitioner is directed to appear before the Court below and if demonstrated to the Court below that no summons were ever served on her after the order of cognizance and if the Court below is satisfied that no service was affected on the petitioner after the order of cognizance, then naturally the petitioner would be entitled to bail. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)