IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2011 / 12TH PHALGUNA 1932 LA.App..No. 663 of 2002(A) ------------------------------ LAR.6/1996 of SUB COURT, CHERTHALA .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT ---------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA),NATIONAL HIGHWAY,CHERTHALA BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. LATHA T. THANKAPPAN RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS ------------------------------------ 1. DEVAKI AMMA,GOURIMANDIRAM, KADAKKARAPPALLY. 2. KRISHNA PRASAD,GOURIMANDIRAM, KADAKKARAPPALLY. * 3. SATHEESH KUMAR,GOURIMANDIRAM, KADAKKARAPPALLY.(DEAD) 4. PADMAVATHI AMMA,GOURIMANDIRAM, KADAKKARAPPALLY. 5. RENGINI,GOURIMANDIRAM,KADAKKARAPPALLY ADV. SRI.G.GOPAKUMAR (CHERTHALA) FOR R2 *IT IS RECORDED THAT 3RD RESPONDENT DIED ON 29.9.03 AND RESPONDENTS 1, 2 AND 4 ARE HIS LEGAL HEIRS AS PER ORDER DATED 3.3.11. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = L.A.A. NO. 663 OF 2002 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 3rd day of March, 2011. J U D G M E N T Pius C. Kuriakose, J. The appeal has come up in the defect list for the reason legal representatives of 3rd respondent are not brought on record. But we notice a memo filed by the Government Pleader to the effect that the other respondents in the party array are the legal representatives of deceased R2. Hence, it is recorded that the other respondents are the legal representatives of the third respondent. We have gone through the impugned judgment. We find that it is relying upon Ext.A1 that the Court below passed the impugned judgment. It is fairly conceded by the senior Government Pleader that Ext.A1 has attained finality in the sense that the Government did not prefer any L.A.A. NO. 663 OF 2002 -:2:- appeal against Ext.A1. Going through the impugned judgment we find the reliance placed on Ext.A1 was justifiable. Under the circumstances the appeal will stand dismissed however without any order as to costs. Sd/- PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,JUDGE. Sd/-N.K. BALAKRISHNAN,JUDGE. ul/- [ True copy ] P.S. to Judge. L.A.A. NO. 663 OF 2002 -:3:- PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = L.A.A. No. 663 OF 2002 = = = = = = = = = = = J U D G M E N T 3rd March, 2011.