- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8743 OF 2006 Shri.Ananda Dnyanu Patil. ...Petitioner VS. 1.The Special Land Acquisition officer no.3, Sangli & ors. ...Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.8744 OF 2006 1.Shri.Shrikant Tukaram Ambi and another. ...Petitioners VS. 1.The Special Land Acquisition officer no.3, Sangli & ors. ...Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.8745 OF 2006 Shri.Nitin Mahadeo Patil & ors. ...Petitioners VS. 1.The Special Land Acquisition officer no.3, Sangli & ors. ...Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.8746 OF 2006 Shri.Narayan Bapu Patil ...Petitioner VS. 1.The Special Land Acquisition officer no.3, Sangli & ors. ...Respondents - 2 - AND WRIT PETITION NO.8747 OF 2006 Shri.Patang Tatoba Patil. ...Petitioner VS. 1.The Special Land Acquisition officer no.3, Sangli & ors. ...Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.8748 OF 2006 1.Shri.Shivaji Bapu Gavade & anr. ...Petitioners VS. 1.The Special Land Acquisition officer no.3, Sangli & ors. ...Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.8749 OF 2006 Shri.Ramchandra Krishna Patil ...Petitioner VS. 1.The Special Land Acquisition officer no.3, Sangli & ors. ...Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.8750 OF 2006 Shri.Nivrutti Shivram Patil ...Petitioner VS. 1.The Special Land Acquisition officer no.3, Sangli & ors. ...Respondents - 3 - AND WRIT PETITION NO.8753 OF 2006 Shri.Shamrao Hari Nikam ...Petitioner VS. 1.The Special Land Acquisition officer no.3, Sangli & ors. ...Respondents --- Mr.Pratap Patil, for Petitioners. Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for Respondents. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 25th January,2008. DATED: 25th January,2008. DATED: 25th January,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C.: . The notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act was published in the official gazette on 14.2.1991. It was published on Chawadi in the village on 9.4.1991 and the notification under Section 6 of the Act has been issued on 2.4.1992. Obviously, therefore Section 6 notification has been issued within a period of one year from the last publication of Section 4 notification. The only ground of challenge in the petitions is that Section 6 notification has not been issued within a period of one year from the last publication of Section 4 notification. From the dates mentioned above, it is clear that the contention of the petitioners is not well founded. There is no substance in the - 4 - petitions. Hence, the petitions are rejected. ---