IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 24-06-2008 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.29562 of 2006 O.A.No.2490 of 1996 1.G.Bheemen 2.B.Bheemen 3.V.Sankaranarayanan 4.V.Natesan 5.S.Ramakrishnan 6.R.Venkataraj 7.A.Rathinasamy 8.K.Thiagarajan 9.P.Gnanapragasam 10.L.Ponnusamy 11.V.R.Jayaraman 12.M.Annamalai .. Petitioners/Applicants Versus 1.Director of School Education, Madras-6. 2.The Chief Educational Officer, Udhagamandalam, Nilgiris District. 3.The Chief Educational Officer, South Arcot Vallalar District, Cuddalore. 4.The Chief Educational Officer, Tiruchirappalli. 5.The Chief Educational Officer, Dharmapuri. 6.The Chief Educational Officer, North Arcot Ambedkar District. Vellore. .. Respondents/Respondents Prayer: This petition has been filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to fix the scale of pay of the applicants in Special Grade of the first level promotion post as per G.O.Ms.No.304, Finance (P.C.) Department, dated 28.3.90, and G.O.Ms.No.216, Finance (PC) Department, dated 22.393. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Petitioners : Mr.S.Mani For Respondents : Mr.T.Sreenivasan Government Advocate O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. Though the prayer sought for by the petitioner in the present writ petition is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioners, dated 20.9.1995, is directed to be disposed of by the second respondent, on merits, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, without going into the merits of case, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 20.9.1995, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the parties concerned, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if it has not been disposed of till date. The petitioners are directed to furnish to the second respondent a copy of the representation, dated 20.9.1995, along with a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Csh Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ To 1.The Director of School Education, Madras-6. 2.The Chief Educational Officer, Udhagamandalam, Nilgiris District. 3.The Chief Educational Officer, South Arcot Vallalar District, Cuddalore. 4.The Chief Educational Officer, Tiruchirappalli. 5.The Chief Educational Officer, Dharmapuri. 6.The Chief Educational Officer, North Arcot Ambedkar District. Vellore. + 1 cc to the Government Pleader, SR No.32062 Writ Petition No.29562 of 2006 GV(CO) SR/7.7.2008 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/