BEFORE THE LOK ADALATH ORGANIZED BY THE KERALA HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.PAREED PILLAY (RETD.CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR (RETD.JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH APRIL 2007 / 14TH CHAITHRA 1929 SA.No. 583 of 2000(C) --------------------- AS.118/1995 of PRL.S.C.,THALASSERY OS.228/1980 of MUNSIFF COURT, PAYYANNUR .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: ----------- RAMANTHALI SREE KARUANTHATTA KAZHAKAM, VADAKKUMBAD THIYAA SAMUDAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT- MUTTIL KRISHNAN PANICKER, S/O.CHANDRAN, NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESENT PRESIDENT- RAMESAN, S/O.CHIRUKANDAN, P.O.VADAKKUMBAD, RAMANTHALI, THALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.SUBRAMANIAM SRI.M.S.NARAYANAN SRI.P.T.GIRIJAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDENTS: ------------- 1. N.P.M.SYED MUHAMMED KOYA THANGAL, S/O.SAYED HAMEED KOYA THANGAL, MERCHANT, VADAKKUMBAD P.O., RAMANTHALI, THALIPPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. N.P.M. SAYED ABU THANGAL, S/O.SAYED HAMEED KOYA THANGAL, MERCHANT, VADAKKUMBAD P.O., RAMANTHALI, THALIPPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.KHALID (FOR R1 & R2) SRI.N.GOPINATHA PANICKER (FOR R1 & R2) SRI.P.VISWAMBARAN (FOR R1 & R2) SRI.R.O.MUHAMED SHEMEEM (FOR R1 & R2) THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR DETERMINATION AT THE LOK ADALATH ALONG WITH SA NO. 584 OF 2000 AND THE PARTIES HAVING SETTLED THE MATTER, THE FOLLOWING AWARD IS PASSED IN TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT: SA NO. 583/2000/C -2- ORDER ON C.M.P. NO.1489 OF 2000 IN SA NO.583 OF 2000 CLOSED. SD/- M.M.PAREED PILLAY (RETD. CHIEF JUSTICE) SD/- 4.4.2007. M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR (RETD. JUDGE) /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE jp M.M.PAREED PILLAY (RETD. CHIEF JUSTICE) M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR (RETD. JUDGE) S.A. Nos.583 of 2000 & 584 of 2000 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of April, 2007 AWARD M.M.PAREED PILLAY (Rtd. C.J. ) The parties in these two cases are same with the only difference that in S.A. No.583 of 2000 the brother of respondent is also a party. 2. The parties have settled their differences out of court and filed a compromise petition along with a sketch . 3. The said petition and sketch will form part of this Award. The appeals are disposed of in terms of the compromise. M.M.PAREED PILLAY (RETD. CHIEF JUSTICE) M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR (RETD. JUDGE) jp