IN THE HIQI Gwwi‘ OF WA P$DESH AT MALPUR M.P.No. 23%;. /92 « *b<0mtg) \ PETITmNER: Abéul Rasheeé Siddiqui, s/a Late Abaul Majee& Siddiqui. agea abauiz 56 years. Advaaatm r/a Saéar Rama, Ambikapur. Distt. $arguja, M.P. IllHIl||l|||||||||ll|llll“llllll CFB000110961 VS. . Distriat Flagzstrat& Sarguja, Anbikapar. 2. 8hr: T s.Chhatwa1, Caneetor/ Diatriwt Magistrate, Sarguja, Ambikabur. 3. Executive Magistrate, Sarguja } ambikapur. RESPGNDEHP$ : yErrrIow (imam Ammws 226/227 09 THE consrITu'EION OF I‘IDIA FOR ISSUE OF A WRIT 0" APPROPQETL RATURE OR ORDER OR DIRECTION GF Lm MTURE 1 MOW a\0 C3 ,/ HIGH COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETiTiON NO. 2892 OF 1992 PETFHONER Abdu.‘ Rasheed Siddiqui, Slo Late Abdu: Maiead Siddiqui, aged about 56 yaars, Advacate, Rlo Sadar Road, Ambikapur, Distt. $urguja. t. Heard iearned counsel for the parties. '2. 8hri Ranbir Singh, leamed counsel appewing fer the petitione‘r, submits that the issue involved in this petition may not be adjudicated as on date, as the factors relevant for grant of Arms licence have completely changed. in view of that the petitioner may be granted permission to make fresh application for grant of Arms licence to the competent authority §.e. District Magistrate, Surguja. 3. Shri Amrito Des, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State, sutamlts that the matter being old of year 1992, it would be just and proper if a fresh application is made by the petitioner, the same will be considered and decided in accordance with {aw and on its own merits. in view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this writ petition for adjudication. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Consequently, interim order passed earlier stands vacated. Gcwr i Veiaus RESPONDENTS 1. District Magistrate, Surguja, Ambikapur. Shri' T.S. Chhatwaf, CoHectorIDistrict Magistrate, Surguja, Ambikapur. 3‘ Executive Sarguja, Ambikapur. (Writ petition under Aiticie 226327 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Ranbit Singh Mamas, counsel for the petitioner; Shri Amrito Das. Panel Lawyer to! the State. Magistrate, GRDER GRAL' (Passed on this 16 day of July, 2009) //’ Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotn , Judge