IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8153 of 2011 KAMLESHWERI YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 25.3.2011 Heard. The petitioner is father-in-law of the complainant of Complaint Case no. 725 C of 2006 and is in custody since 1.12.2010. The case is under section 498A of the IPC and sections ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The rejection order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge does not contain any reason as to why the prayer of the petitioner should not have been allowed. The learned judge has simply translated the allegations in paragraph 5 of his order and has gone on to refuse the prayer without even considering the defence of the petitioner. This court simply disapproves of the approach of the learned Sessions judge in rejecting the prayer for bail of such an accused, considering which, let petitioner Kamleshweri Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.3000/(three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M. Supaul in Complaint Case no. 725 C of 2006. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)