IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 8951 of 2008 Between: Smt.Kasipakam Laxmi W/o.late Kasipakam Chandraiah R/o.Ashok Nagar, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Secretary, Municipal Administration of A.P., Hyderabad. 2 The Municipal Commissioner, Ramagundam Municipality, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District. 3 Sri.B.Rajalingam, Honourable Chairperson, Ramagundam Municipal Council, Karimnagar District. 4 Kandi Sampath S/o.Kandi Ankus R/o. Quarter D 765, Gandhi Nagar, Godavarikhani, Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction, declaring the action of the 2 and 3rd respondents for appointing Fourth Respondent as son of deceased under Compassionate appointment and even after receiving Representation and notice from the petitioner the respondent No.2 and 3 not canceling the appointment of Fourth Respondent under proceedings Roc.No.CI/4042007 posting Orders as Ph worker dated 8.6.2007 and also insisting the petitioner to withdraw the complaint as illegal arbitrary and against to the Principals of Natural Justice and further to direct the Respondents No.2 & 3 to appoint Smt. Sharadha i.e,. Eldest Natural daughter deceased and Petitioner under Compassionate Appointment as per Roc.No.C1/2784/2006/K3-1, dated 29.3.2006, of the C&DMA AP, Hyderabad and pass any other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.T.H.SOWBHAGYA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 8951 of 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition, with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the A.P. Administrative Tribunal. Permission is accorded and the writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out her remedies in the A.P. Administrative Tribunal. There shall be no order as to costs. ________ 24.04.2008 JSU ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KURR} THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 8951 of 2008 Date: 24.04.2008 JSU