IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Writ Petition (S) No. ^^ /2011 PETITIONER : ^ A\AV^-0 c€^ RESPONDENTS : VERSUS Aditya Prasad Sharma S/o Shri Ramanuj Prasad Sharma, aged 60 years, R/o Quarter no F-07 D.N.K.Colony,Opp- Doordarshan Kendra, bharmpura -01 Jagdalpur (C.G.) Disfrict Jagdalpur (C.6.) 1. Stateof Chhattisgarh Through Secretary bepartment of Social . Walfare.Mantr'alaya, bau Kalyan Singh Bhawan.Raipur (C.6) /^ 2. Additional Secretary Department of Social Walfare Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan.Raipur (C.6) 3. Oirector, Department of Panchayat and Social Walfare.Raipur' District Raipur (C6) 4. Collector, Jagdalpur District Jagdalpur(C.S) '5. beputy Director, Department of Panchayat ond Social Walfare.Jagdalpur (C6) District Jagdalpur- (C6) WRIT PETITION UNbER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTETUTION OF INMA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTEORARI. MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRTTS. DIRECTION OR NRECTIONS. ORbER OR ORDERS ^^3&"-^^^^^5^^^^"'f^ > HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 8B :jtpM^LEMR.Jj»Snc%I^Tra_mUBRD!WAKBR W.P.fSlJIO. 3653/2011 PBTITIONBR RBSPOMDBMTs veraus AditvaPrasad Shanma State ofClihattisgM-h & anofher Sbri Sliyana M.Tctechaadaiu, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.Naha Roy, P.L. for thc State. ? H^ :^ ^-^~^"^^—~~t" WRIT PBTTTlOIt imDBR AR'HCLE 22C OP THB COMSTITOTIOW OFIMDIA ORDER (11.07.2011) Gnevance of fhe petitioaer ia the present petition is tfaat ffae petitioner waa appointed as teacher in the Blind, Dcaf & Dumb School, Raipur on 24.2.1972 aad piirsuant to tte various circulars issued by fhe Goverainent, hc ought to have bcen retiTal after attaming fhe age of 62 years whereas he has been retircd on 30dl June201l. Couasel for the petitfoner submits that the purpose of filing this petitfon wouM bc serped if at this stage tfae pctitioner is pennitted to make representation to the resp. No.l aiid ia tura tibc said respondent No.l be directed to decide tfae representation witfain the tnne fiaiae. He further subxnits fhat the case of the petitioner is squarely covered with W.P.(S) No. 2476/06. State counsel fairty subimts that the reprsseatatioa of the petitioncrwould be decjded in accoidaace with law. Considermg tfae facts and circiuastances of fhe case, fhe present petition is disposed of wifh a directk>n to fhe petitioner to laake^a represcntation to fhe resp. No.l wifbia a period of 15 days froui fhc date of receipt of ccsrw of ttus order aad ia tura flie resp. f,->*-^ -%, \rgll?J:"T'~^- .!s-.-' ff ^ No. 1 is also directed to decide fhe said representation ia an objective laanncr coasideriag aU the aspects of the case, wifhiu a flnfher period oftwo inonfhs. It is made ctear that fhla Court has not expressed any opinion on inerits offhe case aad the resp. No. 1 woiiM bc at Hberty to decide fhe representation if so naade, in accordaace wifh law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge •Ifl