..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1732 OF 2008 1. Mr.Balu Sahebrao More, 2. Mr.Rahul Narayan Bhoigad,& 3. Mr.Sukhdev Kundlik Salunke. ..Applicants. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.Vikas Shivarkar, Adv. for Applicants. Mr.H.J.Dedia, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 7th July, 2008. DATED : 7th July, 2008. DATED : 7th July, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants-orig.accused Nos.2 to 4 are seeking bail in C.R.No.17 of 2008 of Paud Police Station. The said case is under Sections 394, 427 r/w. 34 of IPC. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicants states that he is not pressing this application for bail as far as applicant Nos.1 & 3 are concerned, and he is pressing this application for bail only in respect of applicant no.2. Hence, ..(2).. this application is being considered only in respect of applicant No.2 Rahul. 4. The prosecution case is that all the three accused robbed a truck and took away the mobiles worth Rs.15 lakhs. Mobiles worth of Rs.13,82,740/- were recovered from applicant No.3 Sukhdev and mobiles worth of Rs.2,17,260/- were recovered from applicant no.1. There is no recovery at the instance of applicant No.2. Hence, I am inclined to grant bail to applicant no.2. 5. Applicant No.2- Mr.Rahul Narayan Bhoigad to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. Applicant No.2 shall report to Paud Police Station once in a week, till conclusion of the trial. 6. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)