THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No :1456 of 2008 DATED:31-01-2008 BETWEEN: Kajjapu Shiva Kumar. ..... PETITIONER AND The Gram Panchayat, Rep., by the Village Secretary, Peddapalli, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENT ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents in making construction of a Sulabh complex on the 12 feet lane, in front of the shopping complex of the petitioner bearing Dr.No.4-8-83, situated at Janda area, Pedapalli, Karimnagar, as illegal, and arbitrary. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that he is the owner of the shopping complex bearing Door No.4-8-83 situated at Zanda area, Pedapalli. It is stated that the public is using the said 12 feet lane dividing the shopping complex belonging to the Gram Panchayat, and the shopping complex of the petitioner. It is stated that the suit filed by the brother of the petitioner earlier for grant of interim injunction was dismissed for default and the application filed for restoration of the said suit is allowed. It is not known for what purpose the said suit has been filed and what is the effect of interim injunction. It is further stated that the injunction is not prohibiting the respondents to construct the Sulabh Complex. The grievance of the petitioner is that if the Sulabh Complex (toilet) is constructed in front of the shop of the petitioner it may affect the hygienic condition of the area. Sulabh complexes are being constructed in the interest of the public. If the Sulabh Complex is constructed at a suitable place the persons in and around the area will get benefit, but however, it is for the respondent to select a suitable place and construct the Sulabh complex in the interest of the general public. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, Writ Petition is disposed of, but however, it is for the respondent to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner keeping in view the aforesaid observations. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J 31st January, 2008. Tsy