IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9765 of 2009 SITAL PRASAD, son of Late Gunni Gope, resident of Mohalla Brahmpure, P.O. + P.S. Phulwarisharif, District Patna. ----PETITIONER Versus 1. The Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. 2. The Executive Officer, Nutan Circle, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. 3. The Chief Accountant Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. ----RESPONDENTS ----------- 2. 17.8.2009 A Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of the respondent-Corporation. Keep it on record. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-Corporation. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of difference of pension as also the difference of salary as stated in paragraph 1 of the writ application. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Corporation submits that in case the petitioner files representation stating the details of his claims, the same would be considered as per law. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna (respondent no.1). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents in support of his claims along with the certified 2 copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the respondent no.1 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without further delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)