IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-02-2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN W.P.No.2362 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 M/s.Shri Mahalakshmi Metel and Scrap Processing (P) Ltd. H.T.Sc.No.1487, 403D, T.H.Road, Thiruvottiyur, Chennai-600 019, Rep. by its Director Arun Kumar Sharma .. Petitioner. Versus 1.Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission 19-A, Rukmini Lakshmipathy Salai, (Marshall's Road) Egmore, Chennai-600 008 Rep. By its Secretary, 2. The Chairman, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 3.The Superintending Engineer, Chennai Electricity Distribution Circle/North, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. .. Respondents. PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to adjust in future consumption bills, the sum of Rs.8,41,253/- collected from the petitioner, without the authority or approval and against para 33 of the orders of the first respondent in Miscellaneous Petition No.42 of 2008, dated 28.11.2008. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Seshadri For Respondents : No Appearance (R1) Mr.A.Selvendran (R2 & R3) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ O R D E R Heard Mr.K.Seshadri, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.Selvendran, the learned counsel appearing for the second and the third respondents. 2. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal. 3. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the third respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 8.1.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the second and the third respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the third respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 8.1.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 8.1.2010, to the third respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Asst. Registrar. /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar. Csh To 1. The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission 19-A, Rukmini Lakshmipathy Salai, (Marshall's Road) Egmore, Chennai-600 008 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. The Chairman, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 3.The Superintending Engineer, Chennai Electricity Distribution Circle/North, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. + 1 CC TO Mr.K.Seshadri, Advocate Sr 8188 W.P.No.2362 of 2010 SJ (CO) RH (2.3.10) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/