C.W.P No.20481 of 2008 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. C.W.P No.20481 of 2008 Date of Decision: 04.12.2008 Sher Mohammad and another ....Petitioners. Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr.Justice J.S. Khehar Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Ms. Monisha Lamba, Advocate for the petitioners. ... J.S. Khehar, J. (Oral). Through the instant writ petition, the petitioners have impugned the orders of partition, which eventually culminated in the order passed by the Financial Commissioner, Haryana, dated 2.9.2008 (Annexure P-4). It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners, that the partition effected between the respective shareholders, is not equitable. The precise grievance of the petitioners, is that small “taks” of land have been provided to them so as to benefit respondent No.6 – M/s. SAP Private Limited. We have considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners in reference to the site plan placed on the record of this case as Annexure P-5. Although, there can be no denial about the fact, that petitioner No.1 – Sher Mohammad has been granted three separate small “taks” of land, yet it is also clear from the site plan, that there is express access provided from one “tak” to the other. The same is the C.W.P No.20481 of 2008 2 position in so far as petitioner No.2 – Fateh Mohammad is concerned. We are of the view, that the partition effected is most equitable on account of the fact, that each of the three shareholders, namely, Sher Mohammad, Fateh Mohammad and M/s. SAP Private Limited have been allowed almost equal access to the PWD road. For the reasons recorded hereinabove, we find no merit in this petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. ( J.S. Khehar ) Judge ( Nirmaljit Kaur ) Judge. 04.12.2008 sk.