IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERAAD Thurs, the 23th day of June, 2011 Present: Hon’ble Sri Justice N. Ravi Shankar Crl.P.No. 4899 of 2011 Between: Gaddam Kattaiah and another …Petitioners and The Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP Hyderabad and another …Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR Crl.P.No. 4899 of 2011 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. A perusal of the allegations in the FIR would show that they do constitute offences mentioned in it relating to creation of a sale deed. The complaint itself shows that the complainant has filed a civil suit against these petitioners and that is pending. The complaint allegations still further show that there is a dispute relating to the identity of the land got by the de facto complainant from his grand mother and the land said to have been purchased by both these petitioners. This is clearly a matter to be decided on evidence and the police can do it in the course of investigation and if they conclude against the petitioners, by the court thereafter. It shall also be open for the petitioners to place their documents and material before the investigating agency. Hence as the matter involves appreciation of evidence and resolution of disputed questions of fact regarding the identity of land, it follows that this is a not a fit case for interference by this court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners however made a request for the relief regarding arrest of the petitioners. As already seen supra the dispute mainly pertains to the identity of the land and in these circumstances, the police shall take a decision about arrest of the petitioners only after completion of investigation. It shall be open for the petitioners to pursue their remedies after completion of the investigation. 4. With this direction this petition is disposed of. _____________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J. June 23, 2011. *BVS Note: Furnish CC tomorrow. ( BO) BVS.