CWP No. 264 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 264 of 2010 Date of decision 11 .1.2010 Union of India and another ... Petitioner Versus Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench and another ... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr. Joginder Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Banni Thomas ,Advocate for the petitioner 1.To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 2.Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? M.M.KUMAR, J. The instant petition preferred by Union of India under Article 226 of the Constitution is directed against order dated 15.7.2009 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (for brevity 'the Tribunal'). The Tribunal has found that the order passed by a Division Bench of this court on 24.3.2005 in CWP No. 383 CAT of 2004 directing the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal submitted by the applicant respondent have not been strictly complied with and the appeal has not been decided by keeping in view the observations made by the Division Bench of this Court. We have perused the impugned order dated 15.7.2009 passed by the Tribunal, order dated 24.3.2005 passed by the Division Bench of this Court and the order dated 10.11.2006 passed by the Appellate Authority. We are in agreement with the Tribunal that the order dated 10.11.2006 CWP No. 264 of 2010 2 passed by the Appellate Authority is not in conformity with the directions issued by a Division Bench of this Court. Therefore, no occasion is provided to interfere with the directions issued by the Tribunal. The appeal is wholly without merit. Dismissed. (M.M.Kumar) Judge (Jitendra Chauhan) 11.1.2010 Judge okg