IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2008 / 28TH POUSHA 1929 OP.No. 5098 of 2001(F) ---------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ M.J.FRANCIS, PARTNER, ELECTRICAL SALES CORPORATION, M.G.ROAD, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.NELSON J.MANAYIL SRI.BINO BABU R. RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE PRINCIPAL GENERAL MANAGER, DEPT. OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, ERNAKULAM TELECOME DISTRICT, KOCHI 682 011. 2. THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER (TR-V), OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL GENERAL MANAGER, DEPT. OF TELECOMMUNIKCATIONS, ERNAKULAM TELECOM DISTRICT, KOCHI 682 011. 3.THE CHAIRMAN, TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, SANCHAR BHAVAN, NEW DELHI 110 011. BY ADV. SRI.N.NEELAKANTAN ELAYATH,ADDL.CGSC GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.V.MANOJKUMAR. THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: O.P.5098/2001 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF LETTER DT. NIL ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF BILL NO.58144620 DT. 5.6.1999 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2A TRUE COPY OF BILL DT. 5.6.99 NO.58144637 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2B TRUE COPY OF BILL DT. 5.6.99 NO.58147417 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2C TRUE COPY OF BILL DT. 5.6.1999 NO.58147423 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DT. 30.6.1999 SENT BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF LETTER DT. 6.4.2000 ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- Original Petition No.5098 of 2001 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 18th January, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner approached this court aggrieved by Exts.P1 and P2 whereby the annual rental value of private wire connection was enhanced from Rs.1,400/- to Rs.24,558/-. On 15.2.2001, this court passed the following order :- “There will be an interim stay on condition that the petitioner pays an amount of Rs.7,500/- within a period of one month. Standing Counsel to file a statement. If necessary, in the meanwhile, a revised bill also should be issued.” There is no statement yet. The writ petition is hence disposed of in terms of the interim order making it clear that in case any further action is to be taken in the matter, the petitioner shall be issued notice, his objections shall be considered and only after passing orders on the objections with notice to the petitioner, any such action shall be taken. C.M.P.No.8498/01 : Dismissed. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- Original Petition No.5098 of 2001 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 18th January, 2008.