IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. LPA No.115 of 2009. Decided on: 26th October, 2010. Agro Industrial Packaging India Ltd. ….Appellant. Versus Jagdish Chand and others. ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Appellant: Mr. Hamender Chandel, Advocate. For the Respondents : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 7. Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for respondent No.8. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The second respondent in the writ petition is the appellant before this Court against the judgment dated 30th March, 2009 in CWP (T) No.4161 of 2008. The learned counsel for the appellant vehemently contended that the learned Single Judge has granted the relief beyond the scope of the writ petition. We find from the judgment that the learned Single Judge only directed the implementation of the Scheme for Betterment (Appointment) and Regularisation of Muster Roll/Daily Wage Workers in Himachal Pradesh. On a pointed query, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the Scheme is applicable in the Corporation. If that be so, we do not find anything wrong in the direction 2 issued by the learned Single Judge. The judgment only directs the appellant to implement the Scheme, which admittedly is applicable to the Corporation. There is nothing more. Hence, we do not find any merit in the appeal and the same is dismissed, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 26th October, 2010 (Justice Kuldip Singh), (tr) Judge.