IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43983 of 2009 1. NAND KISHOR SINGH 2. Nabal Kishor Singh 3. Prasant Singh Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 22.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Parties are said gotias having land dispute, for which submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is also a counter version of the case on behalf of the petitioners’ side against informant’s party for the incident of the same day. Firing has been taken for making out a case under Section 307 of I.P.C., but that did not injure anyone, theft is super addition and nothing burnt bringing the case under section 436 of the I.P.C. Even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest which is not justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Saharsa Sadar (Sonbarsa Katchary) P.S. Case No. 559 of 2007, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saharsa subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)