THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH C.R.P.No.2971 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner herein is the plaintiff, who filed the suit in O.S.No.14 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Bapatla, for specific performance of contract of sale, dated 02-06-2006, in which he wants to implead one Vani as third defendant in the suit as the 1st defendant is said to have executed a gift deed in her favour. Therefore, he filed I.A.No.911 of 2009 seeking to implead the 3rd respondent as the 3rd defendant in the suit. The court below dismissed the said application on 06-11-2009. Aggrieved thereby, the present application is filed. In a suit for specific performance, the proposed respondent is not proper and necessary party. But, however, if the petitioner wants to examine her, he can as well cite her as his witness and examine her. Therefore, I am of the opinion that the court below had rightly dismissed the said application and as such, I do not find any infirmity legal or otherwise in the impugned order so as to call for interference by this Court. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 12-08-2011 Prv