IN THE HIGH COURT 6F CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) WRIT PETITION IS) NO. §%4 /2006 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER Shyam Bandhu Patel, aged about / 47 years, son of Shri Ghansiram Patel, Upper Division Teacher — Government Tribal Higher Secondary School, Tamta, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. state of Chhattisgarh, through / — secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Oét§ /0 o\ 0 y? s 2. The Commissioner, Department / Of Tribal Welfare, Raipur (C.G.) r; Q \se 3. Assistant ' Commissioner,/ .9 Department of Tribal Welfare, District Jashpur Nagar (C.G.) 0‘9 4. The Principal Government Higher/ Seconoarv (Tribal) School, Tamta, District Jashpur (c.G.)' ( 2 5 . HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (s) No. 5481 of 2006 Pe‘rifioner : Baij Nu'rh Prasud Nanci Versus Respondenfs : Sfu‘re of ChhaHisgarh & ofhers W. P. (s) No. 5484 of 2006 ’ Pefifioner : Shyam Bandhu Pa'l'el Versus Responden'rs : Sin-re of Chhaffisgcrh 6: ofhers W. P. (s) No. 5485 of 2006 PeTi‘rion'er- : Bahadur Singh Sidar Versus Eesponden'rs i 5'l'a1'e of Chho‘Hisgar-h & o‘rhers W. P. (s) No. 5487 of 2006 Pe‘ri'rioner : Devial Kurre Varsus Responden'rs : Sfa're of Chha‘H’isgorh & ofherg W. P. (s) No. 5488 of 2006 Pefifioner : Afma Ram Rae Versus Responden-rs 51'a‘re of Chha‘H’iSgarh & o'rhers W. P. (s) No. 5489 of 2006 Pefifioner 2 Suni! Shrivosfava . Versus Responden'l's : Sfa‘fe of Chho‘H’iégarh & ofhers ‘ W. P. (s) No. 5490 of 2006 Pe‘ri'l'ioner : Dadu Ram Pafel Versus Respondem's : S'ra‘l'e of Chho‘H’isgarh & ofhers And W. P. (s) No. 5491 of 2006 Pe‘rifioner' : Suman Kumar Kujur Versus Responden'rs : Sfa‘re of Chho‘f‘l’isgarh <3: o'l'hers Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Jusfice $a1-ish K. Agnihofri. Shri A. N. Bhakfa, Advoca‘re for ‘H'Ie Pefi‘l'ianers. ‘ 5hri Sumesh Bajaj, 60W. Advocafa for fhe respondenfs/S'rafe. ORDER (10” ember, 2006) . Learned counsel appearing for The pe‘ri‘rioners submifs 'H’m‘r while working as Assisfanf Teachers/Upper Division Teachers, The pe‘iii’ioners have gone on 'h'aining To improve Their qualificaTions on Their own expenses and acquired B.Ed./B.T.I ExaminaTion CerTificaTes. . The presenT wriT peTiTions, being W.P.(s) Nos. 5481/2006, 5484/2006, 5485/2006, 5487/2006, 5488/2006, 5489/2006, 5490/2006 and 5491/2006 involve similar facTs and common quesTion of law. Thus, These 'peTiTions are being disposed of by This common order‘ . According To learned counsel for The peTiTioners, The peTiTioners are enTiTled To Two advance incremenTs in View of The decision of This CourT in The case of VashwanT Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal CorpomTion, Durg and anoTher {2006 (II) MPJR-C6 96}. This CourT in The case' of YashwanT Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal CorporaTion, burg and anoTher (Supra), came To The conclusion ThaT The Teachers, who had obTained B. Ed./B.T.I. Examina‘l’ion @ C 3 ) Cerfificafe on his own expenses, are covered by +he circular da'red 24.12.98 issued by 111a Sin-re Governmenf of Madhya Pmdesh. 4. Learned counsel for 1'he pe'l'H'ioners fur‘l’her submi'l’s Tha‘f fhe facts and ques‘l’ion of law involved in The presenf cases nre V squareiy covered by decision of ‘H‘n’s Cour'r in fhe case of Vashwan'f Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corpora'rion, Dung and anofher (Supra), fo which learned counsel appearing for The respondenfs fairly concedes and agrees wi‘l'h The avermen‘l made by learned counsel appearing for The pe‘fifioners. 5. Accordingly, 1'he wri'l' pei'i'l'ion is allowed in 'l’erms of ‘l‘he order passed in ‘rhe case of Yashwani Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and ano'rher (Supra), subjecl' in verifica'rion of fhe facf as +0 whe‘rher The peTiTioner-s have acquired B. Ed./B.T.I. ExaminaTion Cer‘l'ifica‘l'es on Their own expenses or noT. No order as o cosTs. T Sd/— i Satish K. Agnihotri _ Judge Bablu