IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS THURSDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2011 / 17TH CHAITHRA 1933 OP (FC).No. 1388 of 2011(R) -------------------------------------- OP.919/2010 of FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD .................... PETITIONER (S): ----------------------- SUJANANDAM, AGED 37 YEARS, D/O.SARVESAN NADAR, AMALA BHAVAN, CHITHANKALA, OTTASEKHARAMANGALAM.P.O. BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SRI.V.VIJULAL RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ EASWARA DAS, S/O.BALAKRISHNAN NADAR, AGED 40 YEARS, R/AT MULAMOOTTUVILAKOM EDAVAL,OTTASEKHARAMANGALAM, CONDUCTING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE AS EASWARA VILAS, MANGALLYA SAHABI, 105, MARTHANDAM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES BUILDING, NORTH STREET, MARTHANDAM.P.O., MARTHANDAM-695 125. THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ O.P.(FC) No.1388 of 2011-R ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 7th day of April, 2011 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the Family Court, Nedumangad to pass final order in I.A.No.1837/2010 in O.P.No.919/2010 in the wake of objection to vacate the injunction within such time fixed by this Court. 2. Briefly put, the case of the petitioner is as follows. Petitioner is the respondent in O.P.No.919/2010 before the Family Court, Nedumangad. Petitioner and respondent are wife and husband. Plaint schedule item No.1 property to the extent of 13cents 835 sq.links was purchased in the joint names of petitioner and respondent. Item No.2 is having an extent of 2 acres 78 cents. Alleging that the petitioner has attempted to sell the properties respondent filed a suit. Ext.P1 is the interlocutory application filed. Ext.P2 is the order passed on Ext.P1 application. Petitioner filed Ext.P4 objection to vacate the injunction. Ext.P5 is the application to advance the hearing. 3. We heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Petitioner has already filed Ext.P4 objection. It is stated to be filed on 29.3.2011. Petitioner obviously wants a decision to be taken urgently OPFC 1388/2011 -2- on her objection in view of her contentions. Petitioner has also filed an application to advance the hearing of the interlocutory application. We dispose of the Original Petition by directing that it will be open to the petitioner to impress upon the Family Court, Nedumangad the urgency of passing orders on Ext.P4 by seeking orders on Ext.P5 application to advance the hearing of Ext.P4 objection. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS