IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-4035 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 19.12.2011 Rakesh Sharma ...Petitioner Versus Krishan Kumar ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH. Present :Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ajit Sihag, Advocate, for the respondent. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file revision petition to challenge the summoning order. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. At this state counsel for the petitioner states that because of the pendency of the present petition there would be delay in filing the revision petition. In case an application for condonation of delay is moved by the petitioner along with revision petition, the trial Court shall take into consideration the factum of the pendency of the present petition before this Court and pass an appropriate orders in accordance with law. 19.12.2011 (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) adhikari JUDGE