CWP No. 17352 of 2007 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CWP No. 17352 of 2007 Date of Decision:29.08.2008 M/s Swami Dayal Enterprises ...... Petitioner Versus Punjab Financial Corporation and another ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Onkar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.H.S. Lali, Advocate for the respondents. **** Ajay Tewari, J. The petitioner has challenged the resumption order dated 26.9.2007. Counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner had purchased the property in auction. However, subsequently, it came to light that there was a dispute regarding the title of the property in so much as one Bhupinder Singh had filed a civil suit claiming a prior interest in the same property. Consequently the petitioner was not liable to make the payments since not only did the pending civil suit cast a cloud on his title, he was not able to run the mill due to an interim order. Thus it is urged that the impugned resumption order is liable to be set aside. In our opinion since the CWP No. 17352 of 2007 2 question regarding title of the property in dispute is pending in civil suit, it would not be permissible for this Court to enter into this thicket of controversy, more so since the petitioner is admittedly a party therein along with the respondents. It would be open to the petitioner to seek his remedy in the pending civil suit. Consequently, this petition is dismissed, however, with no order as to costs. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE August 29, 2008 sunita