1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2739 OF 2010 Smt. Qureshi Kausar Kureshi Kalim .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, and others .. Respondents Shri V. D. Hon, Advocate h/f Shri A. D. Shinde, Advocate for the Petitioner. Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent No. 1. Shri S. T. Shelke, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. Shri R. S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 30TH MARCH, 2010. ORAL ORDER [Per NARESH H. PATIL, J. ] : . Heard. 2. The petitioner's nomination paper was rejected on the ground that the petitioner did not furnish caste validity 2 certificate along with her nomination paper, as per the provisions of Section 5-B of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act. Prima facie we find that there is no error apparent on the face of the order. The election process is already set in motion. No interference is called for. The writ petition is dismissed. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] bsb/Mar.10