IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC NO.6133 OF 2008 INDU KUMARI, WIFE OF BIRJU KUMAR @ BIRJU RAVI DAS @ BIRJU PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DINANATH NAGAR, POST OFFICE MARUI, POLICE STATION ROH, DISTRICT NAWADAH ………………………………….PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NAWADAH 3. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, ROH BLOCK, DISTRICT NAWADAH 4. THE MUKHIYA, MARUI GRAM PANCHAYAT, ROH BLOCK, DISTRICT NAWADAH 5. THE MEMBER SECRETARY, MARUI GRAM PANCHAYAT, ROH BLOCK, DISTRICT NAWADAH 6. INDRA DEO PRASAD KUSHWAHA, SON OF SHRI BARHO MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILALGE GURI GHAT, POLICE STATION KAUAKOL, DISTRICT NAWADAH, PRESIDENT OF DISTRICT JANATA DAL (UNITED) …………………………………………………………………………….RESPONDENTS ******** 2 26/04/2011 The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that the District Magistrate, Nawadah has terminated her engagement as an Aanganbari Sevika on the ground that her father-in-law is working in the Garden Rich Ship Builders and Engineering Limited, a Government of India Undertaking at Kolkata. The petitioner has been appointed as Aanganbari Sevika at Dinanath Nagar Aanganbari Centre. Subsequently, she was terminated vide Annexure-1 for the reasons aforesaid. The matter is remitted back to the District Magistrate, Nawadah to reconsider the order dated 03.03.2008 in the light of the judgment of this Court in the case of Sunita Kumari vs. the State of Bihar [2010 (3) PLJR 68]. 2 The petitioner is directed to file an application along with a copy of this order within a period of four week from today. The District Magistrate, Nawadah will reconsider the matter and pass appropriate orders within a period of four months thereafter. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )