1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Civil Application No.2871 Of 2010 In Civil Application No.10915 Of 2009 In First Appeal Stamp No.17059 Of 2009 Antram s/o Nagorao Pinate ... Applicant. Versus Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Through Divisional/Regional Officer, Latur & Others. ... Respondents -------- Mr. N.D. Kendre, Advocate for applicant. Mr. Shrirang S Dande, Advocate for respondent No1. Mr. S.N. Janapurkar, Advocate holding for Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar, for respondent No.2. Mr. V.D. Rakh, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent No.3. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE: 1st OCTOBER 2010 2 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is brother of original claimant before the reference court namely Madhav Nagorao Pinate. The applicant has share in the compensation amount, therefore, the applicant has prayed for adding him as party respondent and claimant to the proceedings. 3) The applicant admittedly was not claimant before the reference Court. The applicant even did not initiate reference proceedings. In this view of the matter, the applicant may resort to appropriate remedies as permissible in law. 4) The civil application is rejected. Sd/- Sd/- (K.K. TATED, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ ca.2871.10