- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1292 OF 2008 SUMMONS NO.1292 OF 2008 SUMMONS NO.1292 OF 2008 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.3229 OF 2007 NO.3229 OF 2007 NO.3229 OF 2007 Sunil Dattaram Sogam ...Plaintiffs vs. Suraksha Realtors & Anr. ...Defendants Mr.G.N.Salunke i/b Mr.G.C.Sawant for the plaintiffs Mr.Vikram Deshmukh i/b Mr.Dhruva & Co. for the defendant No.1 Mr.N.S.Fadia for defendant No.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 7,2008 : OCTOBER 7,2008 : OCTOBER 7,2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs in support of the chamber summons. I have also heard the learned for the first defendant as well as the learned counsel for the second defendant. 2. By this chamber summons, the plaintiff is seeking amendment to the plaint. Amendment is necessitated on account of an agreement dated 7th November 2007 which has been executed by the defendants in favour of the proposed third and fourth defendants. Considering the nature of the amendment sought, the same will have to be allowed as it would not change the nature of the suit. Accordingly, the chamber summons is made absolute in terms of the prayer clause (a). The plaintiff is permitted to carry out amendment in terms of - 2 - the prayer clause (a). 3. Liberty to make an application for grant of ad-interim relief as against the added defendants after the amendment is carried out to the plaint as well as to the notice of motion. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE