@ HIGH COURT OF cHHATTISGARH AT BILAsPUR w. P. (5) No 4222 of2oo7 Laxmi‘ Prasad Sahu $Io. Shri Neelkahth Sahu, Aged about — 39 years, By Caste r— Sahu (O.B.C.), R/o.-Village Birgahni (Champ), Tahsil & Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Versus 1. Chairman. Coal India Limited 1O Nemji ‘Subhash Road. Ko’lka’ta’ (W.B.) Director (P. & IR.), Coal lndia’Ltdq L 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Koikota (W.B.) Member Secretary, JBCC-Vl Joint Bipartite Ccmmittee for The Coal Industry). Coal India Ltd. 10, Netaji Subhash Road. Kolkota (W.B.) Chairman-cum-Managlng Director, S.E.C.L. Head Qtr. Seepat Road. Bilaépur ’(C.G.) Chief General Manager, Korba Area, Distt-Korba, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri) $hri Rahal Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Praveén Das, Advocate for the respondents. Petitioner Respondents 3. ORDER (Passed on this 20$ d‘a’y‘ of July; 2007) , 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is similarly situated to that of the respondents in the matter of Chairman, Central Coalfields Ltd. & others Vs. Jivendra Prasad Tiwari 8: others (Civil Appeal No. 1714 of 2007). ‘Learned‘ counsel further submits that the said Civil Appeal has been disposed of vide order dated 29‘“ March, 2007', passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Learned counsel further submits that this case may also be disposed of in the same terms. which the learned counsel appearing for the respondentsIS.E.C.L. does not controvert. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of in the same terms. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge No order as to costs. Ease . “A.“ BI— .