IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Rev.(T) No.: 32 of 2008. Decided on: 29.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Petitioners. Versus Sukh Ram. … Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the Respondent : None. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Respondent/petitioner was engaged as Beldar in the year 1984. He had completed 10 years’ service with 240 days in each calendar year. The learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal on the basis of judgment rendered by the Apex Court in Mool Raj Upadhayay vs. State of H.P. 1994 (2) SLR 377 has rightly directed the respondents to consider his case qua conferment of work-charge status with effect from 1.1.1994 on completion of 10 years’ service with 240 days in each calendar year. There is no error apparent on the face of record. Consequently, the present petition is closed, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 29, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.