© ^ Singte Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) .../4.K.^./..... of 2011 PETITIONERS 'A'5^v .^>y ^5-- ^ RESPONDENTS r^M?^ y>'~~<w r?/.. ..^'<^ ^S.R.^/6(kLil !^ l/ Sammelal Kenwat, S/o Late Shri Brijlal, aged 56 years Occupation- Service, presently posted as peon, in the office of Pradhan Mantri Gramin Sadak Yojna (Unit No.l) Raigarh (C.G.) 2. Jyoti Ram Yadav S/o Late Shri Dasi Ram Yadav, aged 47 yrs, Occupation- Service, presently posted as peon, in the office of Executive Engineer, R.E.S. Division, Jashpur, Dist- Jashpur (C.G.) Versus if State of Chhattisgarh. ThroUgh- its Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Development Commissioner, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Cornraissioner, Bilaspur Division Dist- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Block Developinent Officer Tribal, Block Development Kharsia, Dist- Raigarh, (C.G.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^A miGH .COURT Or CHHATTISGARHAT- 8ILA8N?fi •SB : HOH-'BLE MR. JUSTZCE PRITINKBR-mWAKBR PETITIONBRS RBSPONDRWTS W.P.rSJ.NO. 4859/2011 Sammela! Kenwat & Another veraus State of C.G. 8& Others Shri Indra Sen Sahu, counsel for the petitioners, Shri A.V.Shridhar, P,L. for the State, WWT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 OP THB CONSTITUT!fflIj^1 IND3A ORDBR (25.08.2011) Challenge in the present petition ia to the order-dated 6,3.1998 and 20.7.1998 whereby the grant of reguiar pay scate to the petitioners has been withdrawn. Counse! for the petitioners submits that the case ofthe petitionerB is squarely covered by the decisioxi of this Court passed on 27.2.07 in W.P.(S) No. 1861 of 2005 (Rafh Dulare prajapati 85 Others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh 8s Others} and other connected matters. He further submits that •the petitioners have already-xnade representations along with the copy of the order passed.by this Conrt before the resp. authorities but till date the same has nbt been considered aiid decided. At this stagey counsel for the State submite that the representations of. the petitioners ^ pending before the respondent authorities shall be considered and decided within the stipulat&d period,, Accordingly, it is direoted that th.e coacerned authority &hall tal^e steps to decide the repreaentations of the petitioners in the light of the decision of this Courty on its own merits and .in accordaiice with law within. a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. With the above obseryation^, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge r"