[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2220 OF 2008 Dinesh Chandrakant Pawar ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mrs.Revati-Mohite Dere Advocate for Applicant Mr.S.S.Pednekar APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 21, 2008 DATE : JULY 21, 2008 DATE : JULY 21, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in CR No.28 of 2008 of Vishrantwadi Police Station, Pune. The said case is mainly under Section 302 of IPC. 3. The learned advocate for the applicant has pointed out that co-accused Sukhdev Chandrakant Pawar has been granted bail and the case of the applicant is similar to that of Sukhdev Pawar. This statement is not controverted by the prosecution. Hence, I am inclined to grant bail to [-2-] the applicant. 4. The applicant-Dinesh Chandrakant Pawar to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rs.thirty thousand only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant to report to Vishrantwadi the police station, Pune once in a week till the conclusion of the trial. 5. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]