IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10710 of 2010 RAMADHAR SINGH, Son of Late Ramdhari Singh, resident of Village- Dubhal, P.S. Magadh Medical College, Gaya, District-Gaya.....Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Baikunth Mishra, Son of Late Dineshwar Mishra, resident of Village- Chapuk, P.S. Goh, District- Aurangabad, presently residing at Baljori Bigha, near Katari Hill Road, Near-Irrigation Department, P.S. Chandauti, District-Gaya..........................................Opposite Parties. ----------- 2. 10.05.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Complainant and counsel appearing for the State. In a complaint case, the cognizance has been taken under Sections 406, 419, 467 and 468 of the I.P.C. The allegation against the petitioner is that he transferred a piece of land to the complainant in the year 1992 but the same land has subsequently been transferred to other person. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has though transferred the area of the same plot number to other person but has not transferred the same portion of the land which was transferred to the complainant but undertakes at the same time to sort out the dispute with the petitioner within a period of four months. 2 Learned counsel for the complainant has argued that other purchaser has also filed a case against the petitioner in which the petitioner moved for anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 40467 of 2009. The certified copy of the order dated 22.12.2009 has been produced which suggests that in that case also the petitioner took time to sort out the dispute and on account of that anticipatory bail was granted but till today the dispute has not been sorted out. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the efforts are on for sorting out the dispute and within next four months dispute will be settled amicably. In that view of the matter, let the petitioner, Ramadhar Singh be released on bail on his surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 1040 of 2007 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M., Ist Class, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 3 However, the complainant will be at liberty to file the cancellation of anticipatory bail of the petitioner if the matter will not be sorted out within the stipulated time. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)