IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13989 of 2010 WAZIR AHMAD @ WAZIR MAHMOOD Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 07.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Parties are heirs of common ancestor but by two wives. Petitioner is niece and there is a land dispute in between the parties, though has been alleged for committing rape upon the victim lady but with cooperation of rest of the co-accused is not believable due to their closely related with each other. One of the co-accused Mukund Mian faced trial and acquitted as the victim herself did not support the allegation of commitment of rape by any of the accused persons. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 162 of 1989, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., West 2 Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)