kbp 1 4246-09.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4246 OF 2009 Kamlabai Appasaheb Wale and ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Tejasvini Kishor Shah and ors. ..Respondents ....... Mr.Prashant Jadhav i/b.Mr.S.D.Patil, for petitioners. Mr.S.S.Patwadhan, for respondent nos.1 and 2. ....... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J.. DATE : 7 th OCTOBER, 2009. P.C. : 1] Advocate for the first and second respondents states that the impugned order has been implemented in the sense that the Court Commissioner has already carried out the commission work. 2] The order impugned is purely an interlocutory order which is capable of being challenged in an appeal which may be preferred by the petitioners against the decree passed in the suit. Moreover, the petitioners can file objections to the report of the Court Commissioner and can even apply to the trial court seeking permission to cross examine the Court Commissioner. 3] Subject to what is observed above the writ petition is not entertained and the same is rejected. ( A.S.OKA, J. )