1 CRAPL NO.3715/2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 26. APPLN/3715/2011 SANJAY MADHUKAR PADALKAR [Criminal] AND ANR V/S THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. J.V.Deshpande and Mr.B.N.Magar, Advocates, for the applicants. Mr.N.B.Patil, APP for State. ... CORAM: A.H.JOSHI AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATE:OCT., 3rd, 2011 1. Heard learned Advocate Mr.J.V.Deshpande, for the petitioner. 2. It is argued that the contents of the FIR, which disclose alleged marriage on 13th July, 2011, are not believable and that the legality of the marriage itself is in controversy, on whatever is averred in the FIR. 3. Based on this submission, learned Advocate has urged that the applicability of Section 498-A as well as other Sections of IPC, comes under serious cloud of doubt. He, therefore, prays for quashing of the FIR. 2 CRAPL NO.3715/2011 4. We have perused the FIR and contentions raised in the petition and tested the submissions of the learned Advocate. 5. In the way and manner in which the case is argued and articulated, it is conveyed that this Court should, at this stage itself, believe that the contents of the complaint are untrue. 6. It is also urged in the alternative that the contents of the complaint do not describe commission of offence. This contention is based on a foundation that the marriage referred in the complaint is not legal. This submission, in turn, brings the believability of the complaint in question. This type of scrutiny cannot be done at this stage. 7. We, therefore, dismiss the application. (A.R.JOSHI) (A.H.JOSHI) JUDGE JUDGE ... agp/3715-11crapl