: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.473 OF 2009 Indira Shyamacharan Yadav ... Applicant V/s. Kulwant Singh Sadaram Singh & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.M.R. Singh for Applicant Mr.V.S. Pandey for Respondent No.1 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2010 P.C.: 1. The present civil revision application has been filed against the order by which the trial Court has set aside the ex-parte decree passed against the respondent. 2. It is contended on behalf of the applicant that the respondent has not explained why he was unable to attend the Court, assuming his advocate did not do so for various reasons. It is submitted that till the application was served on the defendant i.e. the respondent herein, he took no steps to ensure that his case was represented before the trial Court. It is contended that the decree was passed after 9 years and therefore, the respondent ought to have been more vigilant and not rely only on his advocate. : 2 : 3. The trial Court has considered all the various aspects in the matter and after taking note of the judgments of this Court has observed that the respondent had shown sufficient cause for setting aside the ex-parte decree. In my view, there is no need to interfere with the impugned order. 4. Civil Revision Application is dismissed. 5. The suit has been filed in 2000. Therefore it must be expedited. Accordingly, the suit shall be disposed of within a year from today.