1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.1253 OF 2005 Shri Mohanrao Ramchandra Yadav : Petitioner V/s. Tahasildar, Kadegaon & Ors. : Respondents ... Mr.R.V.More for the petitioner. Mr.A.H.Palekar, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the respondents. ... CORAM : S.A. BOBDE, J. June 20, 2005. P.C.: 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr.Palekar, learned Asstt. Govt. Pleader, appears and waives service of rule on behalf of the respondents. Head by consent. 2. The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Government in a Revision filed under section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The only reason given in the cryptic order is as follows:- "This revision application filed by you are 2 disposed of as it is not complied with the important conditions of appellate and Revisional Provisions of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code of 1966." 3. Revisions cannot be dealt with in this manner. The parties are entitled to known the reason for the decision in their case, which must be stated in the order itself. The impugned order is, therefore, set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Government for fresh decision, in accordance with law. The Government shall ensure that proper reasons are given while deciding the revision which shall be decided on merits, as expeditiously as possible, and not later than eight weeks from the date the parties appear before the Government. The parties are directed to appear before the Government on 4.7.2005. 4. The rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. S.A. BOBDE, J.