1 FARHAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 751 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Smt. M.B. Gangwal (Patni), Advocate for petitioner. Shri. N.B. Patil, A.G.P. for State. CORAM: V.C. DAGA & A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATED: 13th JULY 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. After having gone through the order of Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal and having examined the documents, particularly the document Exh. D-1, we find that they unequivocally demonstrate that two candidates i.e. respondent Nos. 3 and 4 have secured marks more than the petitioner. 3. The tribunal has taken reasonable, possible view of the matter. No perversity could be demonstrated in the order by the petitioner. The view taken by the tribunal cannot be 2 faulted. This Court not being the court of appeal, is not expected to substitute its views in place of the order of the tribunal. In this view of the matter, the petition is without any substance and the same is dismissed in liminie with no order as to costs. [A.V. POTDAR, J.] [ V.C. DAGA, J.] ssc/wp751.09