IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 7 OF 2010 SANGAPPA V. TENGINAKAI ... Petitioner Versus THE BRANCH MANAGER ... Respondent Applicant in person, present. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 17th March, 2010 P.C.:- Heard the Applicant in person. The Applicant does not wish to have an advocate to represent him. Perused the decision cited by the Applicant and reported in AIR 2007 Allahabad 194. This petition is filed challenging Order dated 30-1-2010 by which two applications filed by the Applicant have been disposed of. The Applicant is a Claimant in Claim Petition No.35 of 2009. The Claimant has already been examined by Orthopedic Surgeon from Asilo Hospital, and has been found with no disability. The Applicant therefore sought a direction from the learned M.A.C.T. to be examined by Goa Medical College. In case the Applicant is not satisfied with the disability report given by the Orthopedic Surgeon of Asilo Hospital, the Applicant is always free to go to any medical Officer or Goa Medical College and obtain a report of permanent disability. The dismissal of the application, in the facts of the case, therefore could not be faulted. The Applicant also contended before the learned M.A.C.T. that the written statement filed by the Respondent was false. It would be too premature to contend at this stage that the written statement filed by the Respondent is false for, as rightly observed by the learned M.A.C.T. no evidence has started in the said case, and, therefore the dismissal of the second application-Exh.15 also could not be faulted. The Petition therefore is hereby dismissed. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.