IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16771 of 2010 RAJENDRA YADAV . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 21/05/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a police case is under Section-396 of I.P.C. is that his name has transpired on confession of co-accused when the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The application is disposed of with the observation that any prayer for regular bail of the petitioner may be considered after he completes like period of custody as co-accused Sitaram Yadav keeping in mind that the co-accused who named him has himself been enlarged on bail, without being prejudiced by the present order. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)