1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 235 OF 2009 City Corporation Finance India Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Swapnil Mali & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. S.P. Bharti, advocate for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 23rd JUNE, 2009. P.C.- 1. None appeared for the respondent though time was sought on 4th May 2009. Considering the averments made and as there is no denial to the saying, the case is made out by the petitioner for appointment of Receiver. The respondents are using/utilizing those machineries without due payment. The payment is due since March-2009. Therefore, the petitioner have also being initiated the arbitration proceeding. In view of this, to secure the amount as well as to avoid further damage to the property and to avoid further SKT/- 2 complication, I am inclined to grant prayer clause (a). Having once the prayer clause (a) granted, there is nothing survive in this petitioner. The petition is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). However, liberty is granted to the respondents to furnish security of this amount and/or settle the matter. 2. The petition is accordingly allowed with liberty. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) SKT/-