IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31845 of 2011(E) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- M/S.EDAKKALATHUR TRADING COMPANY, ROOM NO.25/2132 AND 2138, GENERAL MERCHANTS, NEHRU BAZAR, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY PARTNER-LEMIN LAWRENCE. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN SMT.RUKHIYABI MOHD KUNHI RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, P.B.NO.2030, MAVELI BHAVAN, MAVELI ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR, KOCHI-682 020. 2. THE MANAGER (PURCHASE), KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, MAVELI BHAVAN, MAVELI ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR, KOCHI-682 020. 3. DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, TRICHUR-680 003. 4. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY), CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE, TRICHUR-680 020. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SMT.MOLLY JACOB,SC, CIVIL SUPPLY CORPORATION R3 & R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.JAMAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.31845/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE VAT REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER DATED 16/5/2007. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE INVOICE ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT, DATED 4/12/2009. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT, DATED 9/12/2009. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE INVOICE DRAWN BY THE PETITIONER, DATED 9/12/2009. EXT.P4(A) TRUE COPY OF THE SALE INVOICE DRAWN BY THE PETITIONER, DATED 9/12/2009. EXT.P4(B) TRUE COPY OF THE SALE INVOICE DRAWN BY THE PETITIONER, DATED 9/12/2009. EXT.P4(C) TRUE COPY OF THE SALE INVOICE DRAWN BY THE PETITIONER, DATED 9/12/2009. EXT.P4(D) TRUE COPY OF THE SALE INVOICE DRAWN BY THE PETITIONER, DATED 9/12/2009. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION GIVEN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER, DATED 16/2/2010. EXT.P5(A) TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT, DATED 24/2/2010. EXT.P5(B) TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER, DATED 22/2/2010. EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION GIVEN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER, DATED 01/3/2010. EXT.P6(A) TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER, DATED 15/3/2010 EXT.P6(B) TRUE COPY OF THE FILLED UP FORMAT GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER, DATED 15/3/2010. EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE KERALA REVENUE RECOVERY ACT, DATED 29/9/2011. EXT.P7(A) TRUE COPY OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 34 OF THE KERALA REVENUE RECOVERY ACT, DATED 29/9/2011. EXT.P8 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT, DATED 24/11/2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ sts P.A.TO.JUDGE S.SIRI JAGAN, J. --------------------------------- WP(C) No.31845 OF 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner purchased wheat from the Civil Supplies Corporation by paying the price as stipulated by the Civil Supplies Corporation for the same. The petitioner has now been directed to pay differential price, in respect of the wheat purchased by the petitioner. According to the petitioner, the petitioner is not liable to pay any differential price as claimed by the Civil Supplies Corporation. 2. In the above circumstances, the petitioner has filed Ext. P8 representation before the first respondent . The petitioner seeks a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P8 expeditiously. WP(C) No.31845 OF 2011 2 Having heard the standing counsel for the Civil Supplies Corporation and the learned Government Pleader, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P8 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner . Till orders are passed on Ext. P8 as directed above, the recovery proceedings for recovery of the differential price which is the subject matter of the representation shall be kept in abeyance. S.SIRI JAGAN. JUDGE mm WP(C) No.31845 OF 2011 3 WP(C) No.31845 OF 2011 4