^;^t« 1'.; '''• • 1N THE H1GH COURI' OF CHHA'n'lSGAKH : B1LASPUK Writ Petition No. 465 ot a005 Petitioners 1. Susluna Visliwakarina, Aged about 23 years, D/o Shri RaBUiiaiiohar Vishwakarma, R/o 132 KB, Sub Station Chliattisgarh, State Electricity Board, new Colony, Tifra., District Biiaspur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Swechha Karhade (after inarriage Pamiar) aged about 24 years, W/o Shri Ritesh Panaar, C/o Viaay Bakre, TUaknagar, Bilaspiu- (Chhattisgarh) Versus , Respondents 1. State » of Chhatisgarh, Throi.^h the Secreta(7r, Departiaeat of Highr Education, D.k.S. Bhawau, Mautraiaya, Raipui- (Chhatisgarta) 2. Vk Chfi-rvfini^ •J-i.<SUJL;t-' llor, Gw Ghasidi visliwavidyaiaya, Uilaspur (Ctmattisgarii) 3. Registrar, Guru Ghasidas Vishwa'.idyalaya, Bilaspur (CIuiatdsgarh) 4. Priiicipal, Govemnient Girls Post Graduate Degree College (Autonoiuous), Bflaspui (Chhattisgarti) 5. Director, Higher Education, Goveraineiit of Chliattisgarh, Science College Campus, Raipur {Chliattisgarh) WRn'J'ETITQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQMSTn'UrLQN__OE'JJMDlA (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Ms Bhartf Soni, Advocate on the aufhority of Shir Jiteadra Pali, Advocate tbr the petitioners. Shri Rajendra Aganval, Paael Law^'er for the respondents No. 1, 4 aaa o. 1. 2. 3. Ttuakur QRDE R (Passed on this 3rd day of November, 2008) Leamed counscl appearing ibr the petitioners, on uistructions, subinits that tlie petitionei's seek to witttdraw ttus petition, as with tfae passage of time^ttus petition has beconie iafructuous. Leamed counsel appearing tbr the respondents/State tias no obiection. In view ofthe above, Uie petxtion 1s disniissed as wlftidrawii, as haviag becoxae iafructuous. Consequently, aU pendiug applications are also dlsinissed. [ 1 Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1