IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1288 of 2008 1. RAM EKBAL SAH 2. RAM NATH SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 22.07.2010 Heard. Petitioners assail the order dated 08.07.2007, passed by 1st Addl. District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in Sadar P.S. Case No.363 of 2004, whereby their application for discharge made under section 227 Cr.P.C. has been rejected. Petitioners have assailed the impugned order on various grounds. It is stated that there is gross violation of section 50 of the NDPS Act. Admittedly the shop from where recoveries have been made was being visited by several persons including the employees of the petitioners. It is next contended that no independent witness has supported the prosecution case. In my view, these issues can well be raised at the time of trial. They do not justify interference with the order which otherwise is in accordance with law considering the scope of the jurisdiction invoked by petitioners in the court below. The application is accordingly disposed of. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )