IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD. DATED THIS THE 17th DAY OF JANUARY 2011 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.PATIL AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL. NO. 1/ 1993(PAR/POS) BETWEEN: SHIVALINGAPPA RAMAPPA BINJAWADGI, MAJOR TEACHER, OF HUNGUND, DISTRICT BIJAPUR. APPELLANT (BY SRI. C.M. DESAI, ARVIND C. DESAI, ADVS.) (ABSENT) AND: 1. SHIVABASAPPA RAMAPPA BINJAWADGI, MAJOR, R/O ILKAL TAL .HUNGUND, DISTRICT BIJAPUR. 2. RAMAPPA SHIVABASAPPA BINJAWADGI, MAJOR. 3. MAHANTAPPA SHIVABASAPPA BINJAWADI, MAJOR. 4. SANGAPPA SHIVABASAPPA BINJAWADGI, MAJOR. 5. SHIVASHANKARAPPA SHIVABASAPA BINJAWADI, M.G. FATHER RESPONDENT NO.1 i.e. SHIVABASAPPA RAMAPPA BINJAWADI. — / 2 6. CHANDRASHEKAR SHIVABASAPPA BINJAWADI, MINOR —DO- 7. SANGAWWA RAMAPPA BINJAWADGI, MAJOR. RESPONDENTS 2 TO 7 R/O HAGEDAL VILLAGE, TALUKA HUNGUND, DISTRICT BIJAPUR. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.G. KULKARNI ADV.)(ABSENT) THIS R.F.A. IS FILED U/SEC. 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED: 25/09/92 PASSED IN 0.S. NO. 86/87, ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE, BAGALKOT, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, N.K.PATIL J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT This case is called. Neither the appellant, respondents nor their respective counsel is present. It shows that none of them is diligent in prosecuting the case. Hence, the appeal filed by appellant stands dismissed for non — prosecution. Sd/ JUDGE MBS/- Sd! JUDGE