IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20019 of 2010 RAJ KUMAR PANDIT . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 04/ 11.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under sections 379, 420 406, 407, 411 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been falsely implicated in the instant case as he is neither the driver of the Van in question nor any incriminating article had been recovered from his possession. He further submits that the stolen property was recovered from the house of Jai Shankar Tiwari. He further submits that it is falsely stated that on the statement of the petitioner the said articles had been recovered, although petitioner had made no such statement at all. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the antecedent report called by this court has been received which shows that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent but inspite of it he is in custody since 11.02.2010. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. Let the petitioner, namely Raj Kumar Pandit be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 2 C.J. M, Patna in connection with Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No. 54 of 2010. Ranjan (S. N Hussain, J.)