IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.460 of 2011 1. Mithilesh Singh, Son of Sri Shyam Kishori Singh, a resident of Village- Harauli, P.S. Barh. 2. Rajesh Kumar @ Pappu Singh, Son of Sri Rama Kant Singh, resident of Barh, P.S. Barh, District- Patna...........................................Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR..........................Opposite Party. ----------- 3. 04.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 453 of 1995 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 324, 307, 302, 353 of the I. P. C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that though the petitioners were named in the formal part of the F. I. R. but during investigation nothing has come against the petitioners and still investigation is pending against the petitioners. It is also submitted that similarly situated accused person, namely, Mathura Mahto has been granted anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. no. 40819 of 2005 on 03.01.2007. Let the learned court below verify the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners and if the aforesaid submissions 2 are correct then the learned court below may consider the regular bail application of the petitioners in view of the fact that other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail and try to dispose off the application on the same day when the petitioners surrender and pray for regular bail. With this observation, this application is disposed off. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)