IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY MONDAY, THE 18TH JULY 2011 / 27TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 16630 of 2011(C) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ PARAMESWARIAMMA, AMMASSAM VEETTIL HOUSE, P.O.ANDATHODE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-679 564. BY ADV. SMT.R.SUDHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSIONER, G.P.O.COMPLEX, NEW DELHI PIN - 110 023 *ADDL.R2 IS IMPLEADED *ADDL.R2: UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME DEPARTMENT, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI. *ADDL.R2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 30/6/11 IN I.A.NO.10153/11 BY ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASG OF INDIA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.16630/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY PETITIONER DATED 16/9/09. P2 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY ONE BALAKRISHNAN. P3 COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE JFCM, KUNNAMKULAM DATED 4/6/2010. P4 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 24/11/2010. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts B.P. Ray, J. ==================================== W.P.(C)No.16630/2011 ==================================== Dated this the 18th day of July, 2011. JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Solicitor General. 2. The prayer in this writ petition is to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to act upon Ext.P4 representation and to dispose of the same in a time bound manner. The allegation of the petitioner is that the Manager of the Union Bank of India, Alappuzha branch in collusion with some others had disbursed loans to different persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that she has filed private complaints before the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Kunnamkulam and cognizance has already been taken under Sections 120B, 406, 409, 420, 465, 468, 467, 471 and 474 read with Section 34 I.P.C. and case is pending as C.C.590/2010. In connection with the crime, process has already been issued to the Manager, Union Bank of India. In that view of the matter, there is no need to direct the respondents to conduct a vigilance enquiry W.P.(C)No.16630/2011 -:2:- against the Manager of the Bank because, the concerned Manager is already facing criminal prosecution. Writ petition is hence dismissed. B.P. Ray, Judge. sl.