GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 508 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 508 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 508 OF 2004 Dada Suryavanshi ...Petitioner versus Jain Sales and Services Pvt.Ltd ...Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Dhananjay Lonkar for the petitioner. Shri D.R.More APP for State. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 22ND JUNE, 2005 22ND JUNE, 2005 22ND JUNE, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The original complaint was dismissed for default. Therefore an application for revision u/s. 397 read with 401 Cr.P.C. was filed and the same is allowed by the learned Sessions Judge. The powers u/s. 397 are wide enough to cover such a contingency where a complainant suffers because of some default on his part giving an opportunity to correct that default cannot be said to be an error of jurisdiction. Hence petition is dismissed. ....