IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRI WRIT PETITION NO. 206 OF 2010. (SAU.NEETA ASHOK JAISWAL...VS... STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTH.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. S.A.Mohta, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. T.A.Mirza, A.P.P. for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. F.T.Mirza, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : A.P.LAVANDE AND P.D.KODE, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 03, 2010. By this petition the petitioner has sought direction against respondent No.3 to take cognizance of the report dated 11.09.2009 allowed by the petitioner. The reply filed on behalf of the respondents discloses that though initially the offences were not registered, on 30th June, 2010 Crime No.73/2010 for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471, 120-B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code was registered against three persons named in paragraph 4 of the affidavit. In course of the hearing we had directed respondents No.2 to file an affidavit stating therein the reasons for not registering first information report promptly and the action, if any, proposed to be taken against respondent No.3. Pursuant to this direction respondent No.2 has filed an affidavit stating that respondent No.3 has committed dereliction of duty and inquiry has been proposed against him. Be that as it may, in view of registration of the first information report the cause of action in the present petition does not survive. Accordingly the petition stands dismissed. CRI.APPW NO. 103/2010. In view of the disposal of the main petition this application stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE RR.