C^- r3^s IN THE HIGILCOURT QF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR^ WRIT PETITION (c) N0. 3^1^ of 2011 PETITIONERS ^ rJIWS^-, €^ t;» Kumar S/o Shri Singh 1. Krishna Kshatriya, Jhandu Kshatriya, aged 46 years, Occupation- Teacher, Governruent Middle School, Piparpara, Tahsil- Kota, District- Bilaspur, R/o D.P Law College Road, Ashok Nagar, Sarkanda Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Smt Shakun Kshatriya, W/o Shri Krishna Kumar Kshatriya, aged 45 years, R/o D.P Law College Road, Ashok Nagar, Sarkanda Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3. Brijesh Singh Kshatriya, S/o Shri Krishna Kumar Kshatriya, aged 22 years, R/o D.P Law College Road, Ashok ht* G Nagar, Bilaspur, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Sarkanda District- Vs RESPONDENTS l'. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Technical Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ' 2. The Director, Department of Technical Education, Polytechnic Premises, Barren Bazar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Government Engineering College, Through its Principal, ., Koni, Bilaspur, / Chhattisgarh 4. The Principal, Government Engineering College, Koni, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER (S): As per the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENT (S):- As per the cause title. Bifl"! :iS-S?^-/Sr^s^'^~;J^ :?^ .'^. ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSOARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETmON fQNo. 3610 <rf2011 PETmONER jiUESPONDENTS Krishna Kumar Kshatriva & Others. VERSUS State ofChhasttisgarii & Otfaers. g^»i»'«t«nw» WRTT PE1THON UNDER ARI1CLE 226 OF THE CONSTirUION aF INDIA 8B: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenthotri. J. Present: Shri Sameer Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A^sy Dwivedi, Deputy Govemment AdvocaSe for fce State/respondents. ORDERrORALI (Passed on 08ta day afJuly, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearu^ fw the petitioners suhmits that the petitioner No. 3 is tiie son of petitioner No. 1 and 2, who has completed his Baehelor of Engineering ftwn respondent No. 3/college. Shri Shrivastava fiullier suhmits that tte petitioner No. 3 is entitled to refimd ofthe tuiticm fee whieh he bss ah^dy paid, in accordance with the circular dated 31,10.2002 whieh adopted the circular dated 30.11.1989 as the petiti<mer No. 1 and 2 are the @-een card holders. Shri Shri'rostava next coHtends thad the issue involved in fhis petition has already been eonsidered aml decided bythis CourtinDr. (Maj'or) Thakur Ajit Singh &. Others v. State <tf Chhattisgarh & Other^. Thus, this petition may also be disposed ofin the same terms. 2. Leamed counsel appearu% for the State/respondents submits that admittedly, the issue with regard to exemption and refund of tuition fee ofthe childrai ofthe green card holders was cuisidered by this Court in the aforestated petition and fhis petition may also be disposed ofin the same terms, however, liberty may be reserved to tfae State/respondents to verify the facte, as pleaded in the petltion. 3. In view of the above submissiaas made by leamed counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is disposed of in tenns oflhe order passed in Dr. (Major) Thctoa- Ajit Singh & Others (supra), subject to verification ofthe facts. Satish K. Agi Judge 'W.P.(C)No. 7222/2009.decidedon 27.09.2010 r