-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6065 OF 2010 Chandrakant Baburao Bhoir and Ors. ..Petitioners. Versus Smt. Vimal P. Khalapurkar and Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Kiran J. Kandpile for the petitioners. Ms. Rachana Chavan i/b D. S. Pagare for the respondents. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : April 20, 2011. P. C. : 1. Heard at length learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. The petition pertains to the recording of mutation entry. It is settled position of law that the mutation entry does not create or extinguish rights of the party and the same are recorded for the fiscal purposes only. A reference can be made to the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Balwant Singh & Another v/s. Daulat Singh, reported in 1997 (7) SCC 137. 3. Remedy of the parties is to approach the Civil Court to get adjudicated their rights. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to entertain the petition and interfere with the impugned order in writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition is therefore dismissed. srp -: 2 :- 4. It is made clear that if such a suit is filed by any of the parties, it shall be decided on its own merits without being influenced by the orders impugned in this petition. In order to enable the parties to approach the Civil Court, parties are directed to maintain status quo in respect of the property in question for the period of four weeks from today. (RANJIT MORE, J.)