IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH JULY 2011 / 15TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 18275 of 2011(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SHEHINA M., D/O.MUHAMMED, SHYLAJA MANZIL, KILIKOLLUR P.O., KOLLAM. 2. NITHA P., D/O.RAGHAVAN, PADINJAREKKARA, KANJIRAPPUZHA, PALAKKAD. 3. AARYA V.T., D/O.VIKRAMAN S., KUNNIL VEEDU, KUNNUKUZHY P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVs. SRI.N.RAGHURAJ & SMT.K.AMMINIKUTTY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN- 673 636 REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE REGISTRAR, THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. PIN- 673 636 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., PIN-673635. 4. THE MOULANA COLLEGE OF NURSING & PARA-MEDICAL SCIENCES, ANGADIPPURAM, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. PIN- 679 322 R1 TO R3 BY SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 18275 of 2011(H) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS P1. PHOTCOPY OF THE CHELAN RECEIPT EVIDENCING THE REMITTANCE OF REVALUATION FEE BY THE IST PETITIONER. P1(a). PHOTCOPY OF THE CHELAN RECEIPT EVIDENCING THE REMITTANCE OF REVALUTATION FEE BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. P1(b). PHOTOCOPY OF THE CHELAN RECEIPT EVIDENCNG THE REMITTANCE OF REVALUTATION FEE BY THE 3RD PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS'S EXHIBITS NIL // TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE kkj ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 18275 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are students who are undergoing the 4th year B.Sc.(Nursing) Course. When the result of the 3rd year examination was declared, they had failed in some papers. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 3rd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge