(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. Writ Petition No. 746 of 2009 Jambhlekar Trading Company, Tamsa, Taluka : Hadgaon, District : Nanded, Through its proprietor, Govind Vijay Labhshetwar, Age : 38 years, Occupation : Business, R/o. Tamsa, Taluka : Hadgaon, District : Nanded. .. Petitioner. versus The Maharashtra State Cooperative Marketing Federation Ltd., Registered Office at Narsi, Natha Street, Kamnur House, Mumbai - 400 009. .. Respondent. .................. Mr. S.S. Nirkhee, Advocate, for the petitioner. .................. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 17TH JUNE 2009. COURT’S ORDER : 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the learned Judge of the Cooperative Court No. (2) 1, Mumbai, dated 19-12-2007 in Case No. CCI/47 of 2005, thereby rejecting the application filed by the present petitioner for recalling the plaintiff for cross examination, and the order dated 22nd July 2008, passed by the learned Member of the Maharashtra State Cooperative Appellate Court, Mumbai, in Revision Application No. 6/2008, thereby dismissing the revision filed by the present petitioner. 2. Mr. S.S. Nirkhee, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that both the courts have erred in rejecting the application for recalling the plaintiff. He submits that since the matter in dispute involves a huge amount, it would be in the interest of justice, that the plaintiff ought to have been recalled. 3. Both the courts have given cogent reasons for rejecting the application. It has been found that the petitioner has not pointed out as to in respect of what new documents the plaintiff is sought to be recalled. 4. In that view of the matter, no interference is warranted in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 5. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE ...................... bgp/wp746