IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14854 of 2006 Dr.Baidyanath Singh, son of late Ram Shewak Singh, resident of village Garura, P.O. + P.S. Sanjholi, District Rohtas, at present working as H.O.D. Hindi Department, Ram Lakhan Singh Yadav College, Aurangabad … Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Magadh University, Bodh Gaya through its Registrar 3. Prof. (Dr.) Shamsad Hussain, the Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya 4. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya 5. Sri Ganesh Prasad Singh, Ex-Proff. Incharge, Ram Lakhan Singh Yadav College, Aurangabad 6. Md. Rayazuddin Ahmad, Proff. Incharge, Ram Lakhan Singh Yadav College, Aurangabad 7. Proff.(Dr.) Banshidhar Lal, C.C.D.C., Magadh University Bodh Gaya 8. Prof. (Dr.) Rana Pratap, H.O.D. Geography, P.G. Magadh University 9. Prof. (Dr.) Vishwa Nath Singh, Deptt. of Sco. Technical Education Incharge, Magadh University 10. Prof. (Dr.) Shyam Bihari Roy, N.S.S., Samayojak, Magadh University 11. Dr. Mazhar Hussain, Principal, Nalanda College, Bihar Sharif 12. Dr. Madan Murari Principal Gaya College, Gaya 13. Dr. Jai Ram Prasad, College Inspection, Arts, Magadh University 14. Dr. Kapildeo Singh, Reader, Eco. Department Incharge, Legal Cell, Magadh University 15. Md. Mazhar Hussain, O.S.D. Legal Branch Office, Magadh University 16. Md. Fahimuddin son of Late Mamaruddin @ Kamo Miyan, (G.S.(I) D.S.O. Magadh University 17. Md. Salaudin Khan, P.A. to V.C. Magadh University 18. The Member of Syndicate Committee, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya … Respondents ----------- 4. 7.7.2011 Having regard to the fact that the issue relating to absorption of the services of teaching and non-teaching staff of 4th phase Colleges including the College in 2 question Ram Lakhan Singh Yadav College, Aurangabad has already acquired finality by the report of Justice S.C.Agrawal Commission as approved by the Apex Court in the case of the State of Bihar & ors. vs. Bihar Rajya M.S.E.S.K.K. Mahasangh & ors., reported in 2005(1) PLJR 464, this Court would not like to go into the same issue, inasmuch as it is the only persons who have been recommended by the Agrawal Commission who will now have a right to be absorbed in the services of the University. Admittedly the petitioner was not recommended for absorption in University Service in the report of Justice S.C. Agrawal Commission and therefore he cannot now get any relief as prayed for by him in this writ application. That being so, this application is wholly misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/