Civil Rev. 2342 of 2009 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH Civil Rev. 2342 of 2009 Date of decision: 7.8.2009 Milkh Raj Petitioner vs Gurdwara Anand Bhawan, Saffuwala Respondent Present Mr. VK Shukla, Advocate M.M.S.BEDI,J. Notice issued to the respondent has been received back served. None has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent. Proceeded against ex-parte A perusal of the file indicates that vide impugned order dated 30.3.2009, the plaintiff-respondent has been permitted to produce a certified copy of the resolution dated 1.11.2003, passed by the Gurdwara Committee on the record. The application for production of the said resolution was opposed on the ground that the plaintiff wanted to delay the proceedings and that the evidence of the plaintiff-respondent stood closed. While allowing the application, the trial court observed that the plaintiff had specifically pleaded about the resolution dated 1.11.2003 in paragraph 6 of the plaint and a copy of the resolution had already been attached with the plaint. The plaintiff-respondent merely wanted to produce the certified copy of the same. I have carefully gone through the facts and circumstances of this case. The suit of the plaintiff is for recovery of Rs. 1,59,020/- on the basis of receipt-cum-undertaking dated 19.6.2002. The resolution in favour Civil Rev. 2342 of 2009 2 of the plaintiff-respondent is not the main controversy between the parties. In view of the fact that no prejudice will be caused to the defendant- petitioner by permitting a certified copy of the resolution dated 1.11.2003 to be placed on record, this petition deserves to be dismissed. No ground for interference is made out. Dismissed. August 7 ,2009 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE