^^A2^f;te^ .R.No.-^^ip^nO^^ (!....-•" J- ^.,...... snt'^1^*"'^ . ....".-••••""" ^-)^^ presen."- ^ _^,,..^.^.- dated....--^:\o') ^? A IN THEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. fONO. &€>\\ /2010 Santosh Kumar, S/o- Shri Mangal Singh, Aged about 30 years, R/o- Village-Halahuli, Tehsil-Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh, Presently working as Sarpanch Gram Panchayat-Halahuli, Tehsil-Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER VERSUS 1. Pardeshi, S/o- Shri Kushwaram Sidar, Aged about-39 years, R/o- Village-Halahuli, Tehsil-Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. /2. Anup Ram, S/o- Shri Ramnarayan Sidar, Aged about-Not known to the petitioner, R/o- Village-Halahuli, Tehsil-Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ^3. Sunita Bai, W/o- Anil Kumar, Aged about -Not known to the petitioner, R/o- Village- Dumarbhantha, Tehsil-Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh, C.G. Presiding Officer (Polling Booth No. 112) Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari, Sub Engineer, Water Resources, Dharamjaygarg, Distt. Raigarh, C.G. . Presiding Officer (Polling Booth No.113 Shri Leelaram Sahu, Prashikshak Mandal, Sanyojak, Baramkela, Distt. Raigarh, C.G. /6". Presiding Officer (Polling Booth No. 111) Shri C.L. Sidar, Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School-Baramkela, Distt. Raigarh, C.G. Sub Division- 7. Sub-Divisional Officer, Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ^ RESPONDENTS i ^£) ^^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^"^ .^ ^^s-e^ : .'^ 'N:^^l'?sr-^ %. ^ssass^j ^ t^^':J U& HLGH_CQUETOF_CHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR WRJTJ>ETITION_(Q No, 601 lof2010 PETmQNER RESPONDENTS'" ' Santosh Kumar. VERSUS Pardeshi & Others. .WRIT PElTnON LWDER ARTICLE 226,'227 OF THE CONSTnTjTION OF INDIA Preseat: Shri Manoj Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitibner. Sliri A.V.Shridhar, Panei Lavn-er forthe State. Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate fbr the Caveator- (Passsd on2.181 dayof October, 2010) 2. Leained counsel appearing fbr tiie petitioner, on insti-uctions, seeks pennission oftlus Court to withd-aw this petition. Leamed couHsel appearuig for other side have no objection. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequeatly, tlie wnt petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Anst