IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10373 of 2011 Madhuri Verma, Alias Madhuri Sinha, Wife of Mr. Sunil Chandra Sinha, Resident of Mohalla – Kastharnighat Road, Fort Area, P.O. - Munger, P.S. - Kotwali (Munger), in the town and District of Munger. . ..... Petitioner Versus 1. The Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University through its Registrar, Bhagalpur. 2. The Vice Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 3. The Registrar, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 4. The Finance Officer, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 5. The Principal, Sunderwati Mahila College, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. .......... Respondents ----------- 2 01.07.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in the name of petitioner. Heard Sri Diwakar Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ashok Kumar Keshri, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents/Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. The petitioner who retired on 31.12.2000 as Head of the Department of Psychology from Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, has prayed for directing the respondents for making payment of retiral dues which are as follows:- 2 I. Amount wrongly deducted from Gratuity of the petitioner -- Rs. 1,04,110.80 II. Amount wrongly deducted as Penal rent – Rs. 12,840 III. Leave Encashment in new rate. IV. Dues revised U.G.C. pay scale from 01-01-96 to 31-12-2000. V. Dues salary from 01-01-82 to Dec.' 1995 VI. Other dues and interest on dues. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the aforesaid claim petitioner has represented before the competent authority however till date no decision has been taken. With the consent of parties the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no. 2/Vice Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed it is expected that respondent no. 2 will examine the same in accordance with law and dispose it of within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no. 2 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine he is also required to pass order for 3 payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal respondent no. 2 is required to pass a speaking order within the said period. The writ petition stands disposed of. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)