IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC NO.9527 OF 2010 1. KRISHNA CHANDRA SHRIVASTAVA S/O LATE VISHVAMBHAR PRASAD R/O DHARMSHALA ROAD, NAGAR, PARISHAD, WARD NO.10, P.S.SUPAUL, DISTT-SUPAUL, DISTT-SUPAUL 2. RUPESH KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA S/O LATE VISHVAMBHAR PRASAD R/O DHARMSHALA ROAD, NAGAR, PARISHAD, WARD NO.10, P.S.SUPAUL, DISTT- SUPAUL, DISTT-SUPAUL 3. KUMAR NILESH S/O LATE VISHVAMBHAR PRASAD R/O DHARMSHALA ROAD, NAGAR, PARISHAD, WARD NO.10, P.S.SUPAUL, DISTT-SUPAUL, DISTT- SUPAUL 4. KUMAR ANILESH S/O LATE VISHVAMBHAR PRASAD R/O DHARMSHALA ROAD, NAGAR, PARISHAD, WARD NO.10, P.S.SUPAUL, DISTT-SUPAUL, DISTT- SUPAUL ………………………………………………………………………………….PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE REVENUE SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA, NEW DELHI 3. THE ZONAL MANAGER, POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA, PATNA 4. THE CHIEF MANAGER, POWER GRID CORPORATION, SAHARSA 5. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, POWER GRID CORPORATION, SUPAUL ………………………………………………………………………………RESPONDENTS ********** 3 17/09/2010 In view of the order passed by this Court in Misc. Appeal No. 72 of 2009, the writ petitioners cannot complain that the respondents have installed electric poles over the lands of the petitioners. At paragraph 11 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, it has been stated that there is a provision that if any damage is caused to the standing crops etc. during the installation, the person so affected will be duly compensated. Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with liberty to move before 2 the authority concerned, in case any damage is caused to the crops, trees etc. standing on their lands as a result of the installation of the electric poles. This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )