1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC No. 460 of 2011 Decided on: 21.10.2011. Ram Singh ....Petitioner Versus Srikant Baldi …Respondent The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy Advocate General Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner is actually aggrieved by Annexures P-2 and P-4, orders. Though, an attempt has been made that the same are passed in contempt of the judgment, Annexure P-1. We are afraid that this contention cannot be appreciated. There is no willful disobedience or violation. The petitioner has to pursue his remedy in appropriate proceedings challenging Annexure P-2 and P-4. Without prejudice to such liberty, the COPC is dismissed. Rule discharged. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. October 21, 2011 (Justice Surinder Singh), (hl/priti) Judge.