C. R. No. 2631 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : C. R. No. 2631 of 2010 Date of Decision : April 23, 2010 Rajesh Garg and another .... Petitioners Vs. Teja Singh and others .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. H. S. Saggu, Advocate for the petitioners. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : This is petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India filed by decree-holders, praying for expeditious disposal of their execution petition. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the case file. The facts have not been stated in correct perspective in the revision petition. There has been no unnecessary delay on the part of the Executing Court. On the other hand, coincidentally, the Presiding Officer of the Executing Court was attending a Refresher Course on one date of hearing fixed in the execution and was on medical leave on two dates of hearing, when the execution was fixed before the Executing Court. In addition to the aforesaid, respondent no.9 was reported to have died, as observed in the order dated 16.03.2009. However, no steps C. R. No. 2631 of 2010 2 for impleading his legal representatives have yet been taken by petitioners – decree-holders. In view of the aforesaid, the instant petition is completely misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. However, nevertheless it is made clear that the Executing Court shall not cause unnecessary delay in the disposal of the execution petition. April 23, 2010 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE