wp1738.11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO1738 OF 2011 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Mr.K.N. Lokhande, Adv. for petitioner. Mr.P.V. Barde, Adv. for respondent. CORAM: S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 08th July, 2011. This petition has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 26th April, 2010 passed by the Industrial Court, Ahmednagar below Exh.U-2 in Complaint ULP No.1/2010 by which the application filed by the original complainant was allowed and the petitioner herein, who is original respondent was directed to provide work to the complainant regularly and also to pay wages for the work done by him. wp1738.11 2 2 The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that even the complainant had challenged the departmental enquiry before the Industrial Court which is not permissible. However, he fairly concedes that the complainant is working in pursuance to the order of the Industrial Court with the petitioner and he is being regularly paid. 3 On the other hand, the learned Counsel for the respondent submits that still the complaint is pending and if the petitioner has any grievance, he can agitate the same before the Industrial Court. Since the interim order is assailed in this petition, this Court may not exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution. 4 Upon hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, I do not find any reason to interfere in this petition. Only the wp1738.11 3 application below Exh.&-2 has been considered by the Industrial Court and equitable order has been passed thereby directing the petitioner herein to provide the work to the complainant and it is also worthy to note that in pursuance to the order of the Industrial Court, the respondent is working with the petitioner. I do not find any reason to entertain this petition. The petitioner can agitate, if he has any grievance, before the Industrial Court. Writ Petition stands dismissed. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) PLK/*