IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No.2379 of 2005 --------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memo- Court’s or randa of Coram,appearances Judge’s orders Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order. --------------------------------------------------- Shri N.A.Kulkarni for petitioner CORAM: A.P.SHAH AND CORAM: A.P.SHAH AND CORAM: A.P.SHAH AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD JJ. 20th June, 2005 20th June, 2005 20th June, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The application made by the petitioner is totally vague and does not even mention when the petitioner Union started functioning. The application is also totally silent on the point as to whether the petitioner Union was in existence during the period of six months prior to filing of the main petition. There is nothing on record to show that the petitioner is in existence in respondent no.2 Company. In the circumstances, the application for impleading the petitioner was rightly rejected by the Industrial Court. Petition is dismissed.