CRLR No. 91 of 2011 with CRMA No. 461 of 2011 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Shri K.S.Bora, Advocate, present for the revisionist. Heard. This revision is directed against the order dated 11.02.2011, passed by Judge Family Court, Hardwar, in Case No. 181 of 2006,whereby said court has directed the revisionist to pay ` 1,000/- per month as interim maintenance to the respondent (wife of the revisionist). From the impugned order it appears that the marriage between the parties is not disputed. It is also not disputed that the respondent is not employed with any organization. Learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that there is decree passed by the court under section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, which is on record passed in the year 2009. But the maintenance case is pending since 2006. In the above circumstance, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this court is of the view, that it is not a fit case for interference with the impugned order passed by the trial court, but this court would like to observe that the trial court shall consider the decree said to have been passed in favour of the revisionist under section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, at the time of final hearing of the application moved under section 125 of Cr.P.C.,with these observations the revision is dismissed. (Stay Application No. 461 of 2011 also stands dismissed). (P.C.P., J.) 10-05-2011 NP