1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 508 OF 2009 Tata Motors Finance Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Eagle Travel Agency & Anr. ...Respondents. Mr.Chinmay Gupte i/by M/s. Mohit Gadkari & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. Digvijay Singh for Respondent No.1. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 13th AUGUST, 2009. P.C.- 1 This Court has already admitted the Petition and granted relief in terms of prayer clause (e), on 30th July, 2009. Considering the averments made and as the Respondents though agreed, not made regular payment and using the said vehicles and as the averments remained uncontroverted, I see there is a case made out by the Petitioner to grant the reliefs as prayed. 2 The learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.1, the Principal Borrower has conceded that the order in terms of prayer clause (d) may be passed. 3 In view of this, and even otherwise, the Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (d) and (e). No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)