MCC No. 942 of 2010 In WPMS No. 1273 of 2004 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Arvind Vashisth, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Brief Holder for the State. Cause shown is sufficient. The restoration application is allowed. Order dated 08/10/2010 is recalled and the writ petition is restored in its original number. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The present writ petition has been filed against the order of the trial court deciding issue No.6 with regard to the valuation of the court fee. In my opinion, the writ petition is not maintainable and it would be open to the petitioner to challenge this order after the suit is decided by raising it as a ground u/S 105 of the C.P.C. The writ petition is dismissed. The court finds that the suit is of the year 1999. The trial court is accordingly directed to decide the suit within six months. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial court within a week. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 10.11.2010 Shiv