IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2008 / 18TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 10257 of 2007(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ D.DOMINIC, S/O.MANUAL, AGED 45 YEARS, THAYYATTUKUNNIL HOUSE, PULICKACHIRA P.O., PAIPPAD, CHANGANASSERY. BY ADV. SRI.R.MURALEEDHARAN PILLAI SRI.P.V.LONACHAN SRI.P.G.PRESANNAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THRIKKODITHANAM POLICE STATION. 2. DEVARAJAN, PLAKULANGARA, CONVENOR, C.I.T.U. HEAD LOAD WORKERS UNION, P.C.KAVALA POST, PAYIPPAD. 3. PRASANNAN KESAVAN, PRACKADIKKAL HOUSE, CONVENOR, T.K.U.C. HEADLOAD WORKERS UNION, P.C.KAVALA POST, PAYIPPAD. 4. ANTONY DEVASSIA, EZHUVANTHANA, CONVENOR, INTUC HEADLOAD WORKERS UNION, P.C.KAVALA POST, PAYIPPAD. 5. ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER, CHANGANASSERY. 6. P.K.THANKAPPAN, PALAKKULAM HOUSE, P.C.KAVALA P.O., PAYIPPAD. WPC 10257/07 7. S.RAJI, THOTTACHIRA HOUSE, NALUKODY P.O., PAYIPPAD. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.A.SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC 10257/07 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS. EXT.P1 - TRUE COPY OF PETITION DATED 4.2.2007 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 - TRUE COPY OF CERTIFICATE NO.PPD-172 DT. 31.12.07. EXT.P3 - TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 14.3.2007 FILED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P3(a) - TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT ON 14.3.2007. EXT.P4 - TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DT. 20.3.2007 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 10257 OF 2007-U ----------------------------------------- Dated 8th January, 2008. JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair, J. This Court has already passed an interim order on 26.3.2007. The learned Government Pleader submitted that at present there is no law and order situation warranting the continuance of the said interim order. In view of the said submission, the writ petition is closed. But, this will not affect the right of the petitioner to approach this Court again, if cause of action arises in future. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. Nm/