f^^ t^-1 '^^^" s r Slngle Bench PETITIONER IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l W. P. (Sl N0. 3^^3/2009 Triveni Jharia, S/o -Shri Tej Rai Jharia, Aged about 43 years R/o VHlage - Katkona, Block - Lakhanpur Presentlyworking as Upper Division Teacher, In Middleschool Sirkotanga, Block - Lakhanpur, Distt. Sarguja, Chhattisgarh, VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Secretaiy, Departm.ent of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawgtn, Mantralaya, Raipur, sChhattisgarh, Collector, Anibikapur, Distt. - Seu-guja, CKhattisgarh,. District Education OfEicer, Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja C.G. RESPONDENTS li l-1i WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIAFORISSUANCEOFAPPROPRIATE WKT Hfc^UE N^iHRE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI ETC. 1. PARTICULARS 0»THB PETITIONER As mentioned in the cause title. r 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPQNDENTS As mentioned in fhe cause title. :-^U ?aiT77lS?IE^^^S^?? .^^A.i^l^^iS^ '''!c=f£?S23i£i^.2£^ XI-HC—78 3?T^i ^T'f^I^ 7TSff Sf^! SFi^icft W*R'lTt(>Wq> T5T "'ii'iiiw't), »Tilwis,fadi'wy. Jj.:f:.^j^c..;3&5^, ^^ an^T^raq? (" TOIIW^fel3i!^I •wiferit^•wnif^ ft^t tfw?R i;3iRnsn^i Af.! SB: Hon. r. Justice Shri Neeraj Mehta counse Shri Yashwant Singh Ti 'Lforthe re 1 for the petitioner. jakur Dv'. AG with Shri Shashank bnts/State. » ChaiEenge in this petitior) passed by respondent No.3 by as Upper Division Teacher, ^ Sarguja has been transferred Lundra, District Sarguja. Contention of the coun^ impugned trsnsfer order has fact that in the present place completed about two and haif petitioner is stilt working in the today he has not been reliev^i administrate exigency in passin^ is to the order dated 30.6.2009 |which the petitioner who is workine jliddle School, Sirkotanga, District Middie School, Dumardih, Biock sunsei ror tne respf petitioner make a suitable propositlor, of the State counse his agreement. However, he pr inker Dii bden i^el for the petitioner is that the passea' without considering the lof posting the petitioner has just [years. He further submits that the l^resent place &f posting and as on fed which shows that there is no the order impugned. sportdents/State submits that let the epresentation to the authorities concerned 'which wouid be deciHed in accordance with law. To this , counsel for the petitioner showea' sys for an interim protection ti!S the representatlon of the petitionpr is decided by the authorities concerned. sf^si^T r<;-ii«h 'tT^H 3TI^T Siqf^ ^o <<•• HWCtTWtK^ 's^ •^WM^, sitilyis, fadtyy ^...y:£a2^..^^ ^3 StI^fT^; ('jqlys't) TOIIW ^ifttT ai^; •2.' ^!^<-t^1 TETR^f ^ f^^ ^N^.T(: ^rsi^Hsn^r Accordingly, the petition the petitioner rnakes a repres^it within a period of 10 days frorfi order, the authorities concem< further period of three weeks order impugned shail be kept j[ fe disposed of with a direction setitioner. ? IA/IA 'lf itation to the authorities concerned the date of receipt of copy of this d shall decide the same vvithin a the date of its receipt. Till then the abeyance so far as it relates to the Sd/- Pririnker Diwaker Judge -*i.