IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No: 26781 of 2008 BETWEEN: S. Lingam S/o. Narasimha, R/o. H.No.3-5-30F, Bharathnagar, Ramanthapur, Ranga Reddy District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 Phool Chand Singh S/o. Budharam Singh, R/o. H.NO.10-02, and 1- 3, Peerzadiguda, Ranga Reddy. 2 Birguban Singh S/o. Ranjith Singh, R/o. H.NO.10-02, and 1-3, Peerzadiguda, Ranga Reddy. 3 Rana Pratap Singh S/o. Late Ramchander Singh, R/o. H.NO.10-02, and 1-3, Peerzadiguda, Ranga Reddy. 4 Tej Pratap Singh S/o. Late Ramchander Singh, R/o. H.NO.10-02, and 1-3, Peerzadiguda, Ranga Reddy. 5 Shamsher Singh S/o. Late Deep Chand Singh, R/o. H.NO.10-02, and 1-3, Peerzadiguda, Ranga Reddy. 6 Shyam Sunder Singh S/o. Late Deep Chand Singh, R/o. H.NO.10- 02, and 1-3, Peerzadiguda, Ranga Reddy. 7 The Special Court under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad, B.R.K.R. Bhavan, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. 8 M.A. Sattar S/o. Md. Khasim, R/o.16-11-16/B, Saleemnagar, Malakpet, Hyderabad. 9 Surendranath Singh S/o. Randeep Singh, R/o. Peerzadiguda, R.R. District. 10 The Commissioner, Uppal Municipality, R.R. District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order passed by the Special Court Under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad in I.A.No.962 of 2007 in L.G.C.No.50 of 2000 dated 1st July, 2008 as illegal, arbitrary and set aside the same by receiving the documents filed in I.A.No.962 of 2007 in L.G.C.No.50 of 2000 and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.VENKATASWAMY Counsel for the Respondent No.7: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J ______________ K.C. BHANU, J December 10, 2008 DSK