S'ngte B@nch IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG^ WRIT PETITION (S) N0. /2011 •^' *? WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. PETITIONER ^^£ •^-s^-"7" ^••••{V^Y'^ RESPONDENTS ^Smt. Scolarist Tirkey, W/o. Anthoni Lakda, aged about 59 years, occupation - Asst. Teacher, Shaskiya Buniyadi Prathmic Shala - Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (CG) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchalnalaya, Directorate, Raipur (CG) Joint Director (Treasury, A/c & Pension), Nutan Chowk, Bilaspur. Distt. Education Officer, Distt. ^ Jashpur (CG) 5. Block Education Officer, Btock - Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (CG) 2. 3. 4. ^ 3TT^T'^T^?N? ^^T ^T^T$TOW ao \: ^IPIfir ^iMl^i ^sf •^l^Kn^, ^•(liwi(o, i®Krtl-(-<lj,< ^-^^•^^u -^200 3TT^T TF^^ (yii^^q^) ^WI^K tii^a SB : Hon'ble Shri Vanindra SVIohan Shrivastava. J. 22-08-2011 Shri A. N. Bhakta, counsel for Shri A. V. Shridhar, Panel L| advance copy. Heard. Learned counsel appearing petitioner is entitled to benefit oftwo ^ having passed B. T I. examination submitted that the issue involved inl integra and the sarne has been find Court in the case of (SC) 59. it is further submit^ similar view in his order dated 06-0] 2008. Learned counsel for the petj Court to order dated 29-04-2010 <pa\ wherein relying upon the judgment Asha Saxena (supra) and the order Appea! No. 87/2009, directions have case for grant oftwo advance increm| issued by the State of Madhya pteaded in the petition. Leamed counsei for the Government had issued a circular petitioner would be examined in thl Government he petitioner. a^er for the State/respondents on ^i^f^fr? "RR^f ^* fe^ 'iF^I^K ^^tRR 3?I^T |for the petitioner submits that the Idvance increments cn aocount of she b^fore appointment at her own oost. !t is |the present petition is no ionger res |!ly declded by the Hon'bie Supreme \vs. of M.P. & Or&, 20)9 ffil) ^d that this Court has also taken a t-2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of tftioner further draws attention of this ^sed in Writ Appeat No. 124 of 2009, y the Supreme Court in the case of ^assed by this Court in another VVrit Ibeen issued for consideratjon of the i^nts as per circuiar dated 21-09-1974 Pr^desh, after verifioation of the facts res(3|Dndents submits that nov^ the State t>n 05-01-2011 and the case of the i| light of the decisjon ot' the State \ '••"^;.. S%JV- ^XI-HC—78 HWMi ^»*tle^ '3~s? -^ww^, ^•ri1^i<A, f^dt^^< —....^...!.-.£^;2i?.r/Li..•^200 3Ti^T <TT5RT (^qi^q^) ^i^r^? ^jch '<TSH ^n^T^FHT^T ^^ITW^H^^T^I In view of the statement made of with a direotion to the respondent aiji claim of the petitioner for grant of twc| law laid down as also in view of circ{|jlar, State Government on 05-01-2011, aft^r the petition wjthjn a period of three rrjonths copy of thi's order ^bove, this petition is finally disposed .jrthoritles to consider and decide the advance inorements In view of the ^ijilar, which has been issued by the verification of the facts pleaded in from the date of receipt of a 'wrf^N ^HH^ff ^* 'fex2t <P»l^l< ^)'^tf?RW^T Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge