1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.792 OF 2008 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.956 OF 2008 Shri Pritesh Yogendra Parekh .... Appellants & Ors. Vs. Shri Kishore Tukaram Patil .... Respondent Mr. Atul G. Damle, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. Suresh Mali, Advocate for respondent. Coram : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J Date : 22nd September, 2008 P.C. 1. This Appeal from order challenges refusal of ad- interim injunction to the appellants to restrain the respondent from carrying out any construction over the suit property. At the time of the application for ad-interim reliefs, the respondent appeared before the court and stated that he is not claiming any right to the property. It is his wife who is in unauthorised possession of 132 sq. mtrs. of land out of the suit land. Therefore, the trial Court has directed the appellants to join wife of respondent as defendant no. 2 to the suit by taking out Chamber Summons. The Court is informed that the Chamber Summons has already been taken out by the appellants. Mr. Mali, learned Advocate for respondent states that the 2 respondent would be consenting for the orders in the Chamber Summons. 2. Perusal of the plaint shows that the allegations made at paragraph 4 thereof are vague and without necessary particulars. It is alleged that on 16th July, 2008, respondent trespassed the suit property and started the construction of chawl on the suit property. The appellants do not specify the extent of the work allegedly carried out by respondent. In these circumstances, it cannot be said that the order of refusal of ad-interim reliefs is perverse. Hence, Appeal from Order is dismissed. 3. In view of the disposal of the Appeal from Order, the Civil Application does not survive. The same is accordingly disposed off. (SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA,J)