i^^^s mGHCOURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPIJR Writ Petttion (2271 No. 7061 of 2008 PETITIONBRS !<'- -,^ RESPONDBNTS 1. Ramu, s/o Hathiram, Caste Sataanu.aged about 67years 2. Kashiram, s/o Hatiurain, Caste Satnami, aged about 30 years Bofh are R/o viUage Parsiya, Tehsil Kfungeli, Distt. Bilaspur Vs. Lalji, s/o Aditya Prasad, R/o yitl^e Parsiya, Tehsil Muugeli Distt. Bilaspiu- (C.G) - (died) Throueh Leeal ReDresentatives (A) Devkumari, aged about 75 years,iwidow of Lalji (B) Laxmi. Bai, aged about 40 years, W/o Arua Kumar Dubey, Daughter of Lalji Both are R/o Mohhala Sarkanda, Bangalipara, TehsU/ Distt. Bilaspur (C.G) (Wrlt Petitioa under Article a27ofthe Coastltution pflndial Appearaace: Shri H. S. Ahluwalia, counsel for the petitioners. Shri H.B.Agrawal, Sr. Advocatewith Snat. Meera Jaiswal, couasel for the respoadents. ORDER (07.10.2009) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J Heard. Leamed counsel for the petitioners seeks perraission to withdraw fhe writ petition with liberty to file a cwil siiit .ia the coinpetent court of civU jurisdiction. He also prays that the intertm order graated by this Court on. 27.01.2009 inay aSso be directed to t>e continued for one inonth. II This is not opposed Uy the couusel for the respondents, .•2-- Rcw Writ Petition (2271 No. 7061 of 2008 Accordmgfy, W.P(227).No.706l/2008 is dismissed as withdrawn with fhe liberty .to the petitioners to file a civil suit before a competeut court of ciyU jurisdfction. It is also directed tiiat the iaterun order giyited by this Court on 27.01.2009 shaU contmue for a further period of one inonth trom today and after the lapse of said period, the iaterim order shaU. autoinatically lose its ef&cacy. This petition, thus stands dteposed of, wifh fhe aforesaid liberty/directions. ; No order as to costs. 'l ^. Sd/- ^ , Sunil Kumar Sinha ^ Judge _1_^