14.wp.2476-09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2476 OF 2009 Yogesh Shantaram More. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra and 2 others. ..Respondents. ... None for the petitioner. Mr.V.S. Masurkar, Govt. Pleader, for the State. Mr.S.B. Shetye, Advocate for respondent No.3. ... CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : 16th JULY, 2009. P.C. :- 1. The petitioner’s prayer in this Petition is that respondent No.2 be directed to forthwith decide the matter regarding validity of caste claim of the petitioner. It is submitted that respondent No.2 has already decided the matter. Though, the petitioner is not present, but, in view of the statement having been made by the Counsel for respondent No.2 that the matter is already decided by respondent No.2, we feel that the Petition has become infructuous. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by respondent No.2, he shall have liberty to take remedies that may be available in law. 2. With the above observations, Writ Petition is disposed of. [BILAL NAZKI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]