In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R. F. A No. 4991 of 2001 (O&M) Dev Raj and others ..... Appellant vs Union Territory of Chandigarh ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. R. K. Dhiman, Advocate, for the appellants. Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Advocate for Ms. Lisa Gill, Advocate, for Union Territory, Chandigarh. Rajesh Bindal J. The landowners have filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts are that the land in Village Palsora (Chandigarh) was acquired vide notification issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, on 8.7.1994, for the development of third phase of Chandigarh (Sector-56). The Land Acquisition Collector vide his award dated 14.3.1995 awarded compensation @ ` 3,38,100/- per acre. Aggrieved against the award, the landowners filed objections which were referred to the learned Reference Court, who keeping in view the material placed on record by the parties, determined the market value of the acquired land @ ` 5,36,000/- per acre. It is this award which is challenged before this court. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the claim made in the present appeal is squarely covered by judgment of this court in RFA No. 1095 of 2000 – Ronki vs Union Territory, Chandigarh , decided on 18.5.2009, whereby compensation payable to the landowners for the acquired land was further enhanced to ` 12,54,880/- per acre. Learned counsel for the respondent did not dispute this factual position. Accordingly, for the reasons recorded in Ronki's case (supra), the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms. It is also directed that in case of any short-fall in respect of the Court fee, the same shall be made good by the appellants within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 13.12.2010 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge