^\^ ^1 fflGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENT8 Smt. Kaleshwari W/o Panmendar Smgh, Aged about 30 yeazs, R/o village Rajq»ur, Tehsil Surajpur, Distt. SurCTJa(CG). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarii, through The Secretary, Department ofWomen and Child DevelofMnent, DKS Bhawaxi, Raipur (CG). 2. The CoUectw (Wmueu and Child Develotmient), Surguja (CG). 3. The Prcgect Offica, Women and Ould Development, Siu^uja, Distt. Surguja (CG). 4. The Chief Executive QfBcer, Isaapad Pandayat Surguja, Distt. Surguja (CG). 5. SmL Kalawati W/o Bew Sai, R/o village Rajapia', Tdsil Surajpur, Distt. Siu^uja (CG). (WRTT PETmQN UNDER ARTIOLE 226 OF THE CCBsfSTTTUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'Me ftfr. Sattsh K. Agnflwtei, J.) Preseirt : N<meforlhepetftioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on 24th ofjanuaiy, 2008) The matter is called fw hearing twice. On botii oecasions, none appeais nor any rqa-esentMion is made on behalf of flw petitioner. The petitioner inay not be inte-ested ia the malter. In view oflfae above, the matter is disinissed for waut ofprosecution. Saftni Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge