HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTIS6ARH : BILASnjR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAY/U<, CJ. PETITIONER RESPQNDENTS Writ Petition No. 3190 OF 2006 1. Ku. Reetu, aged about 10 years, d/o unknown, Through her mother, legal guardian - Ku. Sewati Bai, Dfo. Baldauram Verma, agedabout26 years, R/o. village - Sakari, P.S. Balodabazar, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Vs. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of General Administration and Public Grievances solution, Mantralaya D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Peeluram Verma, aged about 50 yeare, s/o Nanduram, R/o Viltage - Sakari, P.S. Balodabazar, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Present: Shri Virendra Sharma, learned counsel for ttie petiUoner. Shri Yashwant Singh, leamed G.A. for ttieStateofC.G. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 4tn July, 2006) A fully private dispute is brought before this Gourt by filing this writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the ConstituUon of India. The facts are simple and straightforward. According to ttie petitioner, out of the wedtock between her mother Sewati Bai and the third respondent, she was born, but, the third respondent disputes thatthe peUUoner is his daughter. In the circumstances, the writ petttion is filed for a direcUon to the State Govemment of ChhatUsgarh and the Collector, Raipur who are arrayed as respondents one and two respecUvely, to conduct a DNA test for respondent no. 3 and to decide his relationship with the peCfener. In addition, certain ottier reliefe are also sought. This wit petition does not invoh/e enforcing any public law obligaSon. If the third respondent f^s<A disputes parenthood of the petiUoner, it is for the peUtioner to workout her legal remedies in a properly instituted civil suit before the jurisdictional civilCourt. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. Nocoste. Sd/- ChiefJustice