IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5962 of 2007 1. NARESH PRASAD YADAV, son of Sri Jagdish Yadav, resident of village Lakshmipur PO Murli Chandwa, P.S. Udakisanganj, District Madhepura 2. Bhagyamani Kumari, D/o Sri Ramawatar Prasad Yadav, village Hanumannagar, P.O. Murho via Budhma, P.S. + District Madhepura 3. Kundan Kumar, son of Sri Lakshmi Prasad Yadav, at + PO Tanraha, P.S. Kumarkhand, District Madhepura 4. Ajay Kumar Amar, son of Upendra Yadav, resident of village and PO Bhagipur, P.S. Alam Nagar, District Madhepura 5. Punam Kumari, W/o Sri Parash Kumar, resident of village and PO Navtolia, P.S. and District Madhepura 6. Manoj Kumar, son of Sri Dipnarayan Yadav, resident of village and PO Judawaptti, P.S. Kumarkhand, District Madhepura 7. Krishna Kumari, D/o Sri Janardan Prasad Swarnkar, resident of village and PO Ranipatti, P.s. Kumarkhand, District Madhepura 8. Mahanand Kumar, son of Sri Sri Ramawatar Yadav, resident of village Hanumannagar PO Murho, via Budhma, District Madhepura 9. Bijay Kumar Mehta, son of Sri Rudal Mehata, resident of village Aurahi PO Akparaha, P.S. Gamharia, District Madhepura 10. Sima Kumari, D/o Sri Ramanand Prasad, resident of village Aurahi PO Akparaha P.S Gamharia, District Madhepura 11. Roshan Kumar, son of Sri Anil Kumar Yadav, resident of village and PO Naduwapatti, P.S. Kumarkhand, District Madhepura 12. Ashok Kumar, son of Sri Suryanarayan Yadav, resident of village and PO Dhaboli, P.S. Sourbazar, District Saharsa 13. Radheshyam Kumar, son of Sri Rambahadur Yadav, village Pipra PO Golma via Dhaboli, P.S. Sourbazar, District Saharsa 14. Ramanand Prasad Yadav, son of late Siyaram Prasad Yadav, resident of village Jalaiya PO Pastpar, PS Sourbazar, District Saharsa 15. Md. Arif, son of Md. Maniurddin, resident of village and PO Adharpur PS and District Samastipur 16. Mosharrat Parween, D/o Md. Manazir Hussain at + PO Shahpur Baghoni, via Waina, PS + District Samastipur 2 17. Iqbal Ahamad, son of Md. Munazir Hasnain, at + PO Shahpur Baghoni, via Wailli, District Samastipur ... Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through the Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, govt. of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna 2. The Secretary cum Commissioner, H.R.D. Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The Director of Primary and Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4. District Education Officer, Madhepur 5. District Education Officer, Saharsa 6. The Bhartiya Shiksha Parishad Uttarpradesh through its Director, Bharat Bhawan, Matiyari Chinhat, Faizabad Road, Lucknow 7. Director (Research and Training) Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna ... Respondents ----------- 2. 28.10.2010 Having heard counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the State as also taking into account that the claim of the petitioners for their appointment on the post of Panchayat Shikshak is based on their being a trained graduate from Bhartiya Shiksha Parishad and that this Court has already found that Bhartiya Shiksha Parishad does not fulfil the criteria fixed by the State Government of Bihar and its degree of training is not recognized in the State of Bihar, this Court will have no difficulty in dismissing the writ application, inasmuch as for the same cause of action and under the same circumstances two other writ petitions 3 have already been dismissed against which L.P.A.Nos. 509/2009 and 514/2009 are still said to be pending. In this regard it must be recorded that this issue with regard to equivalence of qualification acquired from unrecognized institutions has already been settled by three Division Bench judgments of this Court. In L.P.A. No. 28 of 2010, the State of Bihar and others Vs. Mamta Kumari and its analogous cases disposed of on 28.4.2010 a Division Bench has held that the degree of Madhyama Visharad of Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Allahabad cannot be recognized for appointment on the post of teachers in the State of Bihar. Infact the issue in hand is also squarely covered by the ratio of two earlier division bench judgments of this Court in the case of Dhirendra Kumar Singh and others Vs. State of Bihar and others reported in 2008(1) PLJR 583 and Parvez Alam and others Vs. State of Bihar and others reported in 2009(2) PLJR purpose will be achieved in awaiting the decisions of L.P.A. No. 509/2009 and L.P.A. No. 514/2009. 4 That being so, this application is wholly misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/