IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.981 of 2007 M/S NAMAN SMOKELESS FUEL INDUS Versus THE BIHAR STATE CREDIT INVESTM ----------- 03 14.5.2008 We have heard learned Counsel for the appellant. By an order dated 19.4.2006, the undertaking given on behalf of the present appellant was accepted and it was recorded that petitioner-appellant must liquidate the balance dues alongwith interest on the unpaid amount in six equal installments. It is an admitted position that despite undertaking, the appellant has not liquidated its dues. As a matter of fact, the order dated 19.4.2006 is clear that if the direction is not being complied with, the petitioner may expose itself to a consequential penalty for breach of the undertaking. In this view of the matter,the order passed by the learned Single Judge - 2 - on MJC No. 2033/2006 cannot be faulted. In so far as MJC No.1233 of 2007 filed by the appellant for initiating a proceeding for contempt against Bihar State Credit & Investment,Corporiation Ltd. is concerned, we are informed that the said contempt petition is pending. In view thereof, we are not inclined to make any further observation in this regard. Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed in limine. R.M.Lodha,CJ. C.K.Prasad,J. A.Kumar