:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2781 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2781 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2781 OF 2005 Bhavesh Nanalal Javeri ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Ms.Shantala Mafti for the Applicant. Mr. R.Y.Mirza A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATED : JUNE 28, 2005. DATED : JUNE 28, 2005. DATED : JUNE 28, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Counsel appearing for the parties. My attention has been invited to the order dated 29th April, 2005 passed by this Court. In the said order statement made by the Counsel appearing for the Applicant is recorded that the Applicant will deposit the sum of Rs.2 crores with Company Registrar. My attention has been invited to the further order dated 3th May, 2005 passed by this Court. By this said order this Court granted installments to the Applicant to deposit the amount of Rs.2 crores. 2. The Counsel appearing for the Applicant pointed out that the Applicant has not deposited any amount. In order dated 3rd May, 2005 this court has already recorded that the indulgence can be shown to the :2: Applicant only if the Applicant was to abide by earlier assurance of depositing Rs.2 crores as per the directions of this Court. As the Applicant has not complied with the direction given by this Court and as the Applicant has not abided by the assurance given by him to this Court, this Application deserves to be rejected. Accordingly, the Application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE