1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 2037 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 2654 OF 2009 Chinmay Milind Bhalerao & Anr. ...Plaintiffs. Vs. Milind Bhalerao & Ors. ...Defendants. Mr. Harshad Parekh for the Plaintiffs. Mr. A.G. Damle for Defendant No.2 Mr. Mahesh Shukla for Defendant No.1. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 4th JANUARY, 2010. P.C.- 1 Considering the averments made and as there is no objection, the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). The amendment to be carried out on or before 07/01/2010. 2 The learned counsel appearing for contesting defendant No.1, on instructions, makes statement that they have no objection if the prayers are granted. Respondent No.2 has also no objection for the same. 3 The matter, according to me, can be settled by the parties. 4 S.O. to 11/01/2010, for filing consent terms. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)