^^^^- 'v^^,-^"" ...- 'v^^-'"'" ?.B.^°-';^,Z.ft^£V^...---"" ^e3!:5>'s>x>u'""""' c^. AaW*--- f^~lQ^__^ IN THE mGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH ^•3'b WRITPETITION N0. ^ ~ OF 2006 w PETITIONER D.C. Kinger, S/o Shri H.R. Kinger, Aged about 45 years, Presently working as Medical Officer, Civil Hospital, Kharsia, District Raigarh (CG). Versus RES1PONDENTS «y ^ ^y ^*t ^j^ ij^y ^y.^ f"'1 Union oflndia Through the Secretary, Department of Personnel Public Grievance and Pension, Third Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi. State ofChhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). State ofMadhyaPradesh Through the Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP). .^•i. ^ €:^ Director, Health Services, State Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE^226_^227^FTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA of >A XI-HC-78 sn^T^rf^iRi OTT.^n^rawte il; l' Bari/e '^ J//l° <\ ^ Y< Bi'Wirtittiiii Hwcn 9>ffv<*> 3ST ^ww-ti, tSTflu'Kc, Rldl«y< • ^V4 ^-* IV* «***l*^*oC* ife * sn^Tiraq? (^gfg^sr) STBTmflfersn^T Shri B.D. Guru, counsel fot" Shri Ashok Verma, Standifig Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy (^. Heard. The petitioner who is ^ Hospital, Kharsiva, District Rai.abrt Articie 226/227 ofthe Constitutic The case of the petitionej he v/as allocated to the State of October, 2002 he was re!ieved,| was stayed and now, the responijiei Learned counsel for v/as stayed at the request of t| cannot be stayed forever. As the sep/ices of the pet|t M.P. as back as in the year 200p, directed to relieve the petitioner) StateofM.P.. With the direction aforesaid, Consequentiy, M.(W.)P.I\jo. stand disposed of. C.C. as per RuSes. responijients resp(|>ndents «tll<lf<l41-f111I'lTfffelA<[a|WK ^sri^R'an^r the petitioner. Counsel for respondent No.1. .A. forthe State/respondent No.2. ^orking as Medical Officer in the Ci'/il g^rh has preferred this writ petition under oh of india. is that after reorganization of the State, |V1.P in the year 2002 and in the month of but before relieving, the relieving order are not relieving him. submitted that the refeving order t^e petitioner himseif, buf relieving order itioner have been ailocated to the State of P, therefore, respondents No.2 and 4 are immediately to enable him to ioin in the jd, the petition stands djsposed of. 3.3357/2006 and I.A.No.7887/2006 a!so Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge P.T.O. *?A'-'^PC is^^'^^^^-R