IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39727 of 2009 RAMESH CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 24.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. Submission of the learned senior counsel representing the petitioner is that the petitioner is in custody since 18.9.2009 when Kumarkhand P S Case No.91 of 2009 came to be instituted under sections 341, 323, 324, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The reason for institution of the case is that there are some disputes over construction of a Chhajja over a piece and parcel of land of the informant, which led to some heated discussion and assault. It is stated that a minor scuffle has been given a serious issue and effort has been made by obtaining medical certificate from private doctors to make out a serious case. The petitioner and the informant are agnates and therefore, in the above circumstances, keeping the period spent in custody, petitioner be enlarged on bail. Looking at the allegation and the period spent by the petitioner in custody, coupled with the background to the dispute, let the petitioner Ramesh Chaudhary be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in Kumarkhand P - 2 - S Case No. 91 of 2009. One of the surety will be executed by the father of the petitioner and other by a close relation on due identification by the court below. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)