IN THE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Cr.M.P No. -/ l" _'C/_2010 Slnfile Benc' PETITIONER ,0 ...^^ "^w^^:, \\-^0 Yuvraj @ Yuraj Kanwar, S/o Ramlal Kanwar, Aged about 32 years, R/o Village Chikni (Bundiya), Post Bhatgaon, Tahsil- Pratappur, Distt.-Surguja (C.G.). ^r '-^-^^ VERSUS RESPONDENT Sangeeta, W/o Yuvraj @ Yuraj, Aged about 26 Years, Caste- Kanwar, R/o Village Mohli P.S. and Tahsil Bhaiyathan, District- Surguja (C.G.). PETITION UNDER SECTION_482 OF CQDEOF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE an^I W Vw'sh wnaiT^iWtiw <T ^ HINdl «»*<|ct» 75f -<)i<(|<iq, yialy'ie, f»«fll'HlJ,< ^..:.fr\,..€..r±;.:111fjo. io\ ST^I'q^i' (1°lfj«<<(T) WBIW^ftg 317^1 SB : Hpn'ble Shri Manindra Mbhan Shrivastava, J. 23.09.2010 beeii learined disntissed preferj-ed Shri Ashok Kumar Heard. , This pefition has (Ann.exure R-5),passed by Surajpur by which Crimin^l petitioner/revisioner was whereby stay application Leamed counsel for fhe order of grant of maintenancje application under Section 126(] ex-parte order and an applica(ic was rejected. Against which rejected without proper consid^i Taking into consideradofi ex-parte order itself has months, without entering into| counsel 'for.the petitioner, it wj fo finally decide the applicatioiji stipulated tiine, affording parti^s AcGordingly, this petitioi|i concerned Magistrate to decid|E parte order within a period of 3) Shuklja, counsel for the petitioner. Praveen (:ni<iTo*ili tTf'4<viT ^f 'f^st 'd^f^.U ^affinsn^r lication relnsion filed against order dated 21.7.2001 2"d Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Revision No. 16/2000 ffled by the confirming order dated 23.1.2010 by fhe petitioner has been dismissed. petitioner submits that when an ex-parte was passed against the petitioner, an f,) of Cr.P.C. was prefefred for setdng aside for stay of recovery was made, which has been filed which has also been Iration. that the application for setting aside the pending since last more fhan 10 merits of the claini, as prayed by learned >uld be proper to direct leamed Magistrate for setting aside ex-parte order within an •s proper opportunity of hearing. is finally disposed off with a direction to the application for setting aside the ex- months. Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge remlained