IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 9184 of 2008. Decided on 8th December, 2010. Bihari Lal. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. R.P. Singh and Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate Generals. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 08, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 -