IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1877 of 2010 1. Shyam Kishore Paswan @ Bhim Paswan son of Sri Mundrika Paswan. 2. Mundrika Paswan son of Sri Kailash Paswan. 3. Bachiya Devi wife of Sri Mundrika Paswan. All resident of village- Kharkhura Tarbana, P.S. Delha, District Gaya. … Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR .. Opposite party ----------- 2. 22.02.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioners, counsel for the complainant as also counsel for the State. The fact that allegation under Section 498 A and 323 I.P.C. has come out on a date after filing of an earlier application filed by husband-petitioner no. 1 for restitution of conjugal right and that there is nothing specific as with regard to demand of dowry against the petitioner no. 2 and 3, father-in-law and mother-in-law, this court taking into account the totality of the circumstances is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioners no. 2 and 3. That being so, petitioners no. 2 and 3 namely, Mundrika Paswan and Bachiya Devi, in the event they would surrender within a period of four weeks from today, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial 2 Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 513 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. So far as petitioner no. 1, husband is concerned, in view of nature of allegation in the complaint case, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)