IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.559 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Pushkar Singh S/o Sri Gulab Singh Rawat R/o Village-Mawakot, Patti Motadhak, Tehsil Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: June 3, 2010 Arising out of Crime No.648/2010 Under Sections 304/201 of IPC P.S. Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. G.S. Negi, Advocate for the applicant as well as Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. Government Advocate for the State and also perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is not named in the FIR. He further argued that the case rests upon the circumstantial evidence and chain of circumstances is not complete to connect the applicant with the alleged crime. It is further argued that the co- accused Tajwar Singh and Beena Devi have already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 1.6.2010 and the present applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Pushkar Singh be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of CJM, Pauri Garhwal. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 03.06.2010 RG