IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34449 of 2010 1. MOST.GYANIYA DEVI, D/O JATI SAH 2. RAMJI SAH, S/O JATI SAH 3. TAPESHWAR SAH, S/O RAMJI SAH, PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 3 ARE R/O VILLAGE- SONAUL MAHODAY, P.S. MAJORGANJ, DISTRICT SITAMARHI. 4. GANDHARI SAH, S/O BANSHI SAH, R/O VILLAGE HATHIAUL, P.S. SARLAHI, DISTRICT-SARLAHI (NEPAL) AT PRESENT RESIDING AT SONAUL MAHODAY, P.S. MAJORGANJH, DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. --PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 2 09.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned additional Public Prosecutor for the State Petitioners are named accused in this case arising out of dispute between the children. There is counter version also and, as submitted, parties have already entered into compromise. If it is so and the informant by appearing as witness, supports factum of compromise with his free will and consent without any coercion and also stood as one of the bailers, the petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees 2 ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in Majorganj P.S. Case no. 81 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioners no. 2 to 4 shall remain present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case. If the petitioners no. 2 to 4 fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad