IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3278 OF 2009 Sanjay Rajaram Chougule. ....Petitioner V/s. M/s.Toolex Engineering Pvt. Ltd. ....Respondent Mr. P.D. Dalvi for the Petitioner. Mr. Paras Kuhad i/b M/s.Paras Kuhad Associates for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 7TH JANUARY, 2010. P.C. :- 1. The impugned order warrants no interference. The Industrial court has dealt with the entire case exhaustively. The only question raised before me is that the Petitioner did not get a raise in his wages which some of the other workers were given. There is no agreement regarding the raise in wages. Thus, the only question was whether the Petitioner was being treated unfairly. 2. The Industrial Court has considered a comparison sought to be made by the Petitioner with other employees. For instance, in respect of one Bhimrao Patil, the learned Judge observed that his salary is bound to be higher than that of the Petitioner as he was senior to the Petitioner. The Petitioner did not have produced, the said employees salary details for the relevant period. The case of one Sunil Yadav is also not comparable. He was also not given a wage rise initially. Subsequently, he was given a wage rise as he had improved his performance. 3. I see no reason to re-appreciate the evidence. It is also pertinent to note that the Petitioner has expressly admitted that there was no animosity between him and the employer. He also admitted that he had not been threatened by the employer. 4. In the circumstances, Writ Petition is dismissed.