CWP No.1261 of 2005 11.5.2007 Present : Mr.R.K.Gautam, Senior Advocate with Mr.Naveen K. Bhardwaj, counsel for the petitioner. Mr.K.B.Khajuria, CGSC for R-1. Mr.K.D.Sood, counsel for R-2. Mr.Ajay Baluja, counsel for R-3. CWP No.1261 of 2005 & CMP No.2350 of 2005: The grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition is that he had applied for grant of retail outlet against the scheduled caste quota in between Rodda & Haroli in District Una, H.P. According to the petitioner he had been called for interview on 21.10.2005 but he was not selected. The stand of the respondents is that though the petitioner was called for interview but on scrutiny of the documents it was found that the petitioner had not filed an affidavit as per the Appendix-A required to be filed alongwith the application and therefore he was not permitted to appear in the interview. In case the application of the petitioner itself was incomplete it would have been more appropriate for the Indian Oil Corporation to have rejected the application of the petitioner and he should not have sent the interview letter calling for him for interview. Be that as it may, the petitioner has candidly admitted that he has not attached the affidavit as per Appendix-A with the application. Therefore, his application was incomplete. As such there is no merit in the petition which is dismissed. No costs. (Deepak Gupta), Judge. May 11, 2007 ( Surinder Singh ) PV Judge.