911-WP-1821-2006+ -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 911 WRIT PETITION NO. 1821 OF 2006 BHIMRAO SHYAMRAO MAHALE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1822 OF 2006 SMT. ANNAPURNA TULSHIRAM KOLI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1823 OF 2006 BALU S/O CHUDAMAN PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1824 OF 2006 VIKAS RAMDAS BODADE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1825 OF 2006 DEVIDAS S/O DHANU SHEKOKAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1826 OF 2006 PANDURANG MAHADU MALI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS 911-WP-1821-2006+ -2- WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1827 OF 2006 RAJENDRA S/O PRABHAKAR KANDELKAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1828 OF 2006 VINOD S/O MANILAL GUJRATHI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1829 OF 2006 SHRIDHAR S/O SHANKAR DHANGAR/WAGH VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..... Advocate for Petitioners in all WPs : Mr. Manoj Shinde and Mr. M.K. Goyanka AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Mr. S. K. Tambe ..… CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J. DATED : 20th November, 2019 PER COURT:- Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that all these Writ Petitions pertain to rejection of nomination in respect of election of the Society way back in the year 2006. Learned counsel accepts that all the Writ Petitions have now become infructuous. In view of the same, all the Writ Petitions are hereby dismissed as infructuous. Rule discharged. ( V. K. JADHAV, J.) vre/