In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 4844 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision:August 26, 2009 Garja Singh and others ---Petitioners versus Ram Singh and others ---Respondents Coram: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA *** Present: Mr. Manoj Kumar,Advocate, for the petitioners *** SABINA J. Petitioners have filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking setting aside of order dated 30.3.2009 passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kharar (Annexure P-6). Ram Singh and Nasib Singh had filed a suit for partition and the said suit was decreed vide judgment and decree dated 15.2.1992 by Sub Judge Ist Class, Kharar. Thereafter, an application was filed by plaintiffs Ram Singh and Nasib Singh for final partition by metes and bound after appointment of Local Commissioner. A Local Commissioner was appointed and the report was submitted by the Naib Tehsildar, Kharar. Objections to the said report were filed by the plaintiffs-Ram Singh and Nasib Singh. Vide impugned order dated 30.3.2009, the said objections Civil Revision No. 4844 of 2009 (O&M) -2- were allowed and Tehsildar, Kharar has been appointed as local Commissioner with a direction to visit the spot and demarcate Khasra No. 201 and to prepare proposed partition plan/report, Tehsildar, Kharar has been further directed to submit two proposed plans, suggesting the mode of partition of the suit land. He has further been directed to take in account the shares of the parties, the construction raised by the respective parties in the suit property as well as the fact that there is a main road on the Western side of the property and a street on the Eastern side. The commercial aspect and the market value of the property is also to be taken into consideration by the Tehsildar, Kharar and he shall further report regarding the existing construction on the spot and assess the value of the construction. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, I am of the opinion that the instant revision petition is devoid of any merit. Vide the impugned order, Tehsildar, Kharar shall submit the two proposed partition plans suggesting the mode of partition. The petitioners would be at liberty to file objections to the two plans submitted by the Local Commissioner if the same are not acceptable to them and take all the pleas available to them as per law. Hence, no ground for interference is made out. Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed. (SABINA) JUDGE August 26, 2009 PARAMJIT