IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2008 / 30TH ASWINA 1930 W.A.No.2096 of 2008 ------------------------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.26960 OF 2008-H, DATED 18.09.2008) -------- APPELLANT/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C):- ---------------------------------------------------------- R.V.S.M. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PRAYAR P.O., OCHIRA - 690 547, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER A.JAYANTHAKUMAR, AMRUTHESWARY, PRAYAR. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.K.JAGADEESH SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN W.P.(C):- ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ALAPPUZHA. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MAVELIKKARA. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.MEERA. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:- H.L.Dattu,C.J. & A.K.Basheer,J. -------------------------------------------- W.A.No.2096 of 2008 -------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 22nd October, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu,C.J. This Writ Appeal is directed against the orders passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C).No.26960 of 2008 dated 18.09.2008. (2) The one and only direction that was sought in the writ petition was, to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the statutory authority to consider and dispose of the review petition said to have been filed by the petitioner. (3) The learned Single Judge, noticing that the writ petition and the Writ Appeal filed by the petitioner for the very same relief have already been rejected by this Court, has observed that question of directing the respondents to consider the review petition, said to have been filed by the petitioner, does not arise for consideration and decision in the writ petition. Accordingly, has rejected the writ petition. We do not find any infirmity in the orders passed by the learned Single Judge, which would call for our interference in appeal. Therefore, the Writ Appeal requires to be rejected and it is rejected. Ordered accordingly. H.L.Dattu Chief Justice A.K.Basheer Judge vku/-