1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Appeal No. 196 of 2009 [Harshad N, Katkoria Vs. Deepak S. Kommalu] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. G.P. Naphade, Adv., for the appellant. Mr. Sudhir Mahajan, Adv., for respondent. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 01st April, 2010. 1. Heard. 2. The prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act has resulted in acquittal. 3. The learned Trial Judge did not believe the complainant, as the Trial Court found that the story suggested by the accused was probable. 4. The complainant has failed to prove the transaction of lending. 5. In this situation, the appeal does not have any merit. No indulgence is called for. 6. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Judge |Hedau| 2