IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.32900-M of 2010 Date of Decision:3.1.2011 Jaspreet Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Amit Bakshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Bajwa, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Prayer made in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.157 dated 8.6.2010 registered under Sections 307/452/324/323/506/148/149 IPC at Police Station Nakodar, District Jalandhar. On 15.11.2010, the interim bail was granted to the petitioner subject to the condition that he shall join investigation as and when required by the police and shall comply with conditions specified in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. On 2.12.2010, the following order was passed: “ It is stated by the learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Ramel Singh that the petitioner has not joined the investigation. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner prays for last opportunity to enable the petitioner to join the investigation. Crl. M. No.32900-M of 2010 -2- Adjourned to 3.1.2011 to enable the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer in the concerned Police Station at 10.00 a.m. on 8.12.2010. Adjourned to 3.1.2011. Interim order to continue.” Today, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from ASI Ramel Singh states that the petitioner has still not joined the investigation. Accordingly, the petitioner does not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail. Dismissed. 3.1.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE