IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1682 of 2010 1. RUPA DEVI W/O SRI ABHIRAM PRASAD SHASTRI R/O AT P.OO. MENIJOHARA, P.S.GOH,DISTT-AURANGABAD Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT GOVT.OF BIHAR,PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR , PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT GOVT.OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE COMMISSIONER MAGADH DIVISION , GAYA 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AURANGABAD 6. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATI RAJ OFFICER AURANGABAD 7. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER-CUM-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILA PARISAD, ARURANGABAD,DISTT-AURANGABAD ----------- 2/ 04/04/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is stated to be the Chairman of the Zila Parishad, Aurangabad. She is aggrieved by the orders dated 11.12.2009 and 19.12.2009 directing an enquiry with regard to certain claims and appropriate action against the concerned. The apprehension of the petitioner appears misconceived at this stage. If any enquiry has been held, as contended on behalf of the respondents in the counter affidavit, then unless and until the petitioner was a part of the enquiry with opportunity to defend herself she shall have to be given an opportunity to defend herself in light of any findings in the enquiry only whereafter can she be visited with any adverse orders imposing liability. The writ application stands disposed with the aforesaid observations. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)