IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5655 of 2010 1. BINAY SAHNI S/O SRI RAMPRIT SAHNI R/O VILL.- HARPUR BARAHETTA, P.S.- SARAIRANJAN, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 10.05.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Sections 420 and 406 of the Penal code as also different provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act. Petitioner is said to be the middleman. As per allegation, he had forcibly taken a sum of Rs. four thousand from Urmila Devi as the commission for being allotted Indira Awash Yojana. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for identical allegation another case was also lodged in which he has been privileged with bail. It is contended that he does not hold a public office. It is next contended that he is in custody since 14- 12-2009. Learned Spl. P.P. appearing on behalf of the State submitted that there is direct allegation of forcibly obtaining a sum of Rs. four thousand from Urmila Devi followed by threats. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Spl. Judge ( Vigilance) 2 Muzaffarpur in connection with Spl case no. 08 of 2009, Sarairanjan P.S.Case no. 30 of 2009, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioner. (ii) Petitioner shall fully cooperate in the expeditious disposal of the trial . Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)