SBCWP3963/1997 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3963/1997 Nemi Chand Saini and Harish Kumar Saini Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order ::: 25.02.2010 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq None present for petitioners Shri Ganesh Meena, Government Counsel and Shri S.D. Khaspuria, Additional Government Counsel for respondents #### By the Court:- Case called. No one appeared on behalf of petitioners even in second round. This writ petition has been filed by petitioners aggrieved by rejection of their candidature for appointment on the post of Senior Teacher. According to petitioners, they have been serving the aided institution and possessing requisite experience, but respondents did not consider them eligible for appointment on the post of Senior Teacher and rejected their candidature treating them inexperienced. Petitioner No.1 Nemi Chand Saini has placed on record certificate of experience issued on 25.06.1997 in his favour by Principal of Saini SBCWP3963/1997 // 2 // Senior Secondary School, Alwar. Petitioner No.2 Harish Kumar Saini has also produced on record certificate of experience issued on 25.06.1997 in his favour by the same School and same Principal. The respondents contend that certificates produced by petitioners were not genuine inasmuch as therefrom it is not proved whether petitioners were working in aided institution against aided posts. The certificates are vague. Further they contend that so far petitioner No.2 is concerned, he was give benefit of his being handicapped and therefore he was given appointment against that quota. Further, however, the case of petitioner No.1 was liable to be rejected because he did not possess requisite certificate. In view of the clarification furnished by respondents and considering the fact that petitioner No.2 has already been appointed and case of petitioner No.1 was rejected on the ground of his not having requisite experience, I do not find any merit in this writ petition and the same is dismissed. A copy of this judgment be endorsed to the petitioner No.1 for information. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//