IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 6558 of 2004 Between: Y. Purthvi S/o Late Y. Mallaiah R/o Plot No. 34, Ambedkar Nagar,Kanajiguda, Alwal, Ranga Reddy District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Malkajgiri Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 2 The Revenue Inspector, Mandal Revenue Officer, Malkajgiri Mandal, Ranga Reddy District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particulalry one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering the peaceful possession of the petitioner house plot No. 34 admeasuring 90 Sq.yds. situated at Kanojiguda, Alwal, Malkajgiri Mandal, Ranga Reddy District without any notice is null and void Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.BUCHI BABU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ASSIGNMENT The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: Writ Petition is filed alleging that the respondents and in particular the 2nd respondent is interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioner’s house plot No.34 in an extent of 90 sq.yards in Kanojiguda, Alwal, Malkajigiri Mandal. The first respondent has filed a counter affidavit stating that Weaker Section Housing was proposed in the Gram Kantam area as per a layout prepared by the District Social Welfare Officer and Revenue Divisional Officer. The petitioner’s mother one Balamma was allotted a house site patta on 6.7.1991 in plot No.34 by the RDO, Chevella Division, in an extent of 90 square yards. On 20.1.1995, the petitioner submitted an application that as his mother Balamma had expired on 28.2.1994, the 1st respondent transfer the house site patta in his name as his other brothers had given an affidavit that they have no objection for the same. After due enquiry, the 1st respondent granted a house site patta to the petitioner by proceedings dated 27.3.1995. The first respondent denies the petitioner’s allegation that the property is being visited frequently with a view to dispossess the petitioner. The first respondent states that after filing of the writ petition, the answering respondent visited Plot No.34 in Kanojiguda Village, for enquiry and found one Smt. Lakshmi Bai, W/o K. Maisaiah, residing in the house plot allotted to the petitioner. The first respondent categorically denies the petitioner’s allegation that the State or any State agency intends to dispossess the petitioner. The petitioner has not filed any pleading rebutting the averments in the counter affidavit. In the circumstances, there are no merits. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. GODA RAGHURAM, J Date: 21.4.2008 cvm