IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2043 of 2008 MD. NASEEM ABDULLAH Versus SMT. JANAK NANDANI SINHA & ORS ----------- 2 5/12/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court it has not become clear as to what portion of the order dated 2.7.2008 has not been sought to be recalled. Earlier by order dated 2.7.2008 the disputed signature of the plaintiff-opposite party on being verified in the plaint, affidavit and Vakalatnama was sought to be compared with the specimen signature to be given in the Court. When such prayer was allowed and the plaintiff had appeared in the Court and had given his specimen signature. Obviously comparison of forged signature was to be made by looking into the specimen signature. From the impugned order it appears that the Court has refused to allow the petitioner to take photograph of the specimen signature given by the plaintiff in the Court and comparison is sought to be made amongst the forged disputed signatures. If that be the purport of the 2 impugned order, it would definitely run contrary to the earlier order dated 2.7.2008. Be that as it may, the petitioner is given liberty to approach the court below and file a clear application that he wants the specimen signature to be compared with the forged signature in the plaint, affidavit and Vakalatnama and the Court below is directed to consider the same in terms of its earlier order dated 2.7.2008. With the aforementioned observation/direction this application is disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Abhay Kumar