In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 3065 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: May 26, 2009 Subhashs Chand .. Petitioner Vs. Smt. Santosh .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J On examination of the impugned order, it transpires that the trial court after adjusting the amount of maintenance which has been paid to the respondent, awarded further sum of Rs.5000/- per month payable to the respondent. Had the court ordered Rs.18000/- then certainly the petitioner had to pay only Rs.5000/- more and it is just a way of making observations and nothing more. It cannot be said in any manner that adjustment of Rs.13,000/- has not been made in the order of interim maintenance passed by the learned District Judge, Karnal. The observations made by the Apex Court in case Sudeep Chaudhary vs. Radha Chaudhary, AIR 1999 Supreme Court 536, are not in any way disputed. While keeping in view all the facts and circumstances of the case, including the fact that the petitioner has an amount of Rs.2.00 crores which he had earned out of the sale proceeds and also the valuable land he possesses, the court in its own words had adjusted the amount and awarded Rs.5000/- more to the petitioner under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Dismissed. May 26, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge