IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DECEMBER 2009 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 36394 of 2009(O) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 7/1/2008 IN CP.31/06 IN OS.369/2001 of MUNSIF COURT, KUTHUPARAMBA .................... PETITIONER(S)/JUDGMENT DEBTOR/DEFENDANT: --------------- KANOTH RAGHAVAN, 57 YEARS, S/O.KUNHAMBU, MUKUND BHAVAN, PUZHARI POST, THOLAMBRA, THOLAMBRA AMSOM, PUZHARI DESOM, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT SRI.K.N.ABHILASH RESPONDENT(S)/DECREE HOLDER/PLAINTIFF: --------------- AJEESH.P., (MINOR) REPRESENTED BY C.V.VIMALA, D/O.NANU, BUSINESS, AGED 44 YEARS, THALASSERY AMSOM DESOM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.36394 OF 2009 (O) ----------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of December, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is the judgment debtor in E.P.No.31 of 2006 in O.S.No.369 of 2001 on the file of the Munsiff Court, Koothuparamba. Negativing his plea of no means in execution of the decree passed in the above suit, the learned Munsiff has ordered for issuing warrant against him to realise the decree debt. Ext.P3 is the copy of the order. Propriety and correctness of that order is challenged in the writ petition invoking the supervisory jurisdiction vested with this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Having regard to the submissions made and taking note of the facts and circumstances presented, I find no notice to the respondent is necessary, and, hence, it is dispensed with. The decree executed is one passed in a suit for money and the sum WPC.36394/09 2 outstanding towards the decree debt in a suit instituted as early as in 2001 is found to be Rs.7,038/-. Perusing Ext.P3 order and considering the submissions made by the counsel, I find that there is no scope for interfering with the order under the visitorial jurisdiction vested with this Court. Ext.P3 order passed by the learned Munsiff is found to be proper, valid and correct. Writ petition lacks merit, and it is dismissed. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE prp