THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1972 of 2011 Dated 02nd February, 2011 Between: G.Ravi Kumar …Petitioner And Government of Andhra Pradesh, Agriculture and Cooperation (Marketing) Department, rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri S.Girmoji Rao Counsel for respondents: GP for Agriculture The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a certiorari to quash proceedings in Roc.No.572/2010, dated 23.12.2010, of respondent No.4. I have heard Sri S.Girmoji Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, and perused the record. By the impugned proceedings, the petitioner, who is in occupation of shop No.4, Market Yard Complex, Kurnool, owned by respondent No.4, was called upon to attend the office of respondent No.4 on 29.12.2010 at 10.30 am for negotiations in view of the proposal to take possession of the shop by giving a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The Impugned proceedings are thus in the nature of a notice, which has not determined the rights of the parties. Therefore, the petitioner has not suffered any order prejudicial to his interest, giving raise to cause of action of instituting substantive proceedings. The petitioner is entitled to participate in the negotiations and if any action adverse to his interest is taken, he is entitled to invoke the remedy of arbitration as envisaged in Clause-xvii of the lease deed entered into between him and respondent No.4. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.2412 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 02nd February, 2011 VGB