IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13786 of 2009 SUNIL KUMAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.6.2009 Heard. The allegations and facts have been discussed in my earlier rejection order contained in Annexure 1, while refusing the prayer for bail earlier made by the petitioner. A copy of bail order in favour of a co-accused passed in Cr.Misc. No.6868 of 2009 has been produced but considering the facts and the allegation which appear against the present petitioner, I am not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner. The petition is dismissed. It was informed that the trial court is sluggish in taking up the case and is not enforcing the production of witnesses. The trial court must identify its duties and dispose of the case as quickly as possible. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)