@ HEGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH AT BIL FUR Wfit MW (5} N0,3332 Of 209? Petitioners 1. Vinod Kumar Gupm Slo Shri Ramanand Gupta Age abbut 38 years. Assistant Teaaher. Govt. Primary Schuol, Tekari (Kunda), Block - Arang. Om - Raipur (C.G.) 2. Mohan ' La! Yadav Slo Shri Bhukhan Lal Yadav A96 about 38 years, Assistant Teacher. Govt. Primary $chool. Barbanda. Biock - Dharsinva, Distt. - Raipur @S.) Versus ,&esmMmB 1 . state of Chhamsgarh Through Secrabry, Educamn Department, D.K.S. Bhavan. Raipur (0.6.) 2. District Education Ofiicer. Raipur (ca) (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of he ConWon of India) i Be h: 'ble s ‘c atish K. i Present : Shri Ajay shrivashva, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Baiai. Govt. Advocate far the State. ORDER (Passed on 11$ July. 2007) The question of law invoived-herein is as to whether he petitioners are entiued to regular pay scaie w.e.f. the date d inm appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. Leamed counsoi appearing for fhe petiiioners as weii as for the State/respondents joinw submit that the fads and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in W.P. No.14mm6 (Aernan Jain Vs. The State Govemment of Chhath’sgarh & another), which was allowed Vida order dated 10.1 1 .2006. In view of the above-stated submissions made by leamed counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms subject to verification of the facts. No order as to costs. Sd/- lndu Satish K.Agnihr)tiri i» Judge ;