1 criap-99.04 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 99 OF 2004 1. Laxman s/o Bhikaji Paradhe, Age 60 years, Occ: Pensioner r/o. Vishalnagar Plot No.28, Garkheda Parisar, Aurangabad. 2. Shantabai d/o Namdeo Lokhande, Age 50 years, Occ: Household, R/o. Nageshwarwadi, Aurangabad. 3. Sawitrabai w/o Baliram Bansode, Age 45 years, Occ: Household, R/o. Milind Nagar, Osmanpura, Aurangabad. 4. Savitabai w/o Madhukarrao Lokhande, Age 55 years, Occ: Household, r/o Janapuri, Tq. Loha, Dist. Nanded. 5. Vimulbai w/o Tukaram Bhagade, Age: 45 years, Occ: Household, r/o. C-3, Near Town Centre, CIDCO, Aurangabad. 6. Daiwatabai w/o Shidhram Suryewanshi, Age: 45 years, Occ: Household, R/o Nagsen Nagar, Osmanpura, Aurangabad. 7. Sunil Vithalrao Suryawanshi, Age: 38 years, Occ: Service R/o. N-2, CIDCO, Aurangabad. 8. Premlabai Vithalrao Suryawanshi, Age 45 years, Occ: Household R/o Thakre Nagar, CIDCO, Aurangabad. 9. Anusayabai w/o Laxmanrao Kamble, Age 44 years, Occ: Service, r/o Samta Nagar, Aurangabad. 10. Sakhubai Hariharrao Sonule, Age 55 years, Occ: Household r/o Vikas Nagar, Nanded. 11. Anita Madhavrao Wathore, Age 32 years, occ: Household, r/o Samatanagar, Nanded. 2 criap-99.04 12. Gunwant Satwaji Gaikwad Age 36 years, Occ: Service, r/o. Nagsennagar, Osmanpura, Aurangabad. 13. Rohidas Shankarrao Shingare, Age: 45 years, Occ: Service R/o. Nandanwan Colony, Aurangabad. 14. Mayadevi d/o Kamaji Gachche Age: 46 years, Occ: Business r/o Nageshwarwadi Aurangabad. PETITIONERS versus 1. The State of Maharashtra THROUGH the Commissioner of Police Aurangabad. 2. The Police Inspector, Police Station, Cantonment, Aurangabad. 3. Shamsherkhan s/o Bashirkhan Pathan, Age 60 years, Occ: Agriculture r/o Satara, Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad. 4. Lalkhan s/o bashir Khan Pathan, Age 40 years Occ. Labour 40, Satara Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad. 5. Chand Khan s/o Bashir Khan Pathan, Age years, Occ. Labour 40 Satara Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad. 6. Khaja s/o Basir Khan Pathan, Age 36 years, Occ: Labour 40 Satara Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad. respondents ------- None for the applicants. Shri N.B.Patil, A.P.P. for Respondents no.1 and 2. ------- Coram: A.H.Joshi & A.R.Joshi, JJ. Date : 17th October, 2011. Oral Judgment (Per: A.H. Joshi, J.) 1. Read the application. It is seen that the applicant has challenged the FIR registered under Crime No.45 of 2003 3 criap-99.04 with Cantonment Police Station, Aurangabad, for offences under Sections 420, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. It appears that the crime was registered on 24.2.2003. The application has been filed on 9.1.2004. Though the application was admitted by order dated 8.7.2004, interim relief, by way of stay to investigation was not granted. 3. In this background of the matter, no purpose would be served by keeping the application pending. 4. We, therefore, dispose of the application and discharge the rule. (A.R.Joshi, J.) (A.H.Joshi, J.) pnd/criap-99-04