IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33293 of 2010 RAMPATI DEVI & ANR . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 12.10.2010 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case under Sections 341, 323, 354, 353, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant who is the Head Mistress of the school had to select ‘Tola volunteers’, selection was completed on 10.2.2010. It is alleged that while informant was teaching the children Arjun Ram along with his wife Rampati Devi and one Hiramati Devi pulled her out of the class room and assaulted her it is also alleged that they took away her chain. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this case has been instituted because of the fact that the petitioner had lodged Gaunaha P.S. Case No. 28 of 2010 because the children of the S.C./ S.T. had forced to sit away from the other children. It is also submitted that the allegation of pulling the chain is ornamental, whereas there is no serious allegation as far as the factum of assault is concerned. Be that as it may petitioners namely Rampati Devi and Hiramati Devi are directed to be 2 released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of eight weeks in connection with Gaunaha P.S. Case No.28 of 2010 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. Amit (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)