IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 475 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- MAYANKBHAI NAVINBHAI PATEL Versus SULOCHANABEN D/O CHATURBHAI NATHABHAI PATEL -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR NS SHETH for Petitioner No. 1 MR SA DESAI for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA Date of decision: 04/02/2003 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Learned Advocate for the petitioner Mr. N.S. Sheth submits that the Hindu Marriage Petition for divorce is disposed of on 27.12.2000 and this Revision Application is filed against an interim order passed in the said HMP. Therefore, the learned advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sheth seeks permission to withdraw this Revision Application. Permission granted. This Revision Application stands disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Stay if any granted earlier shall stand vacated. 2. An amount of Rs.27,500/- is deposited by the petitioner in the Registry. Some amount has been paid to the opponent out of the amount deposited. Registry is directed to refund the remaining amount to the petitioner or the learned Advocate for the petitioner. (J.R. Vora, J.) p.n.nair