2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8630 OF 2009 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 134 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5309 OF 2002 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : P.R. BORKAR.J. DATED : 05.09.2009 1. Heard Adv. Shri V.D. Patnoorkar for the applicant. He points out order of this Court dated 14th July, 2009, in which it is said that the petitioner shall take suitable steps regarding issuance of notice to respondent No.2 within two weeks, failing which the petition shall stand dismissed against respondent No.2 without referring back to the Court. Present petitioner has filed this Civil Application on 27th July, 2009. So, it appears that the application was filed on the last day of two weeks, if we are to apply principle of the Limitation Act, that the day of order on which the order is passed is to be omitted. In this view 2 of the matter, in my opinion, notice can be issued to respondent No.2. So, the application is allowed. Issue notice to respondent No.2, returnable after eight weeks. 2. The order of dismissal mentioned in the title of Contempt Petition No. 134 of 2009 is hereby set aside. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2009/SEP09/ca8630.09