IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN WRIT PETITION No.1950 of 2010 Between: Prabha Naidu. … Petitioner And The Andhra Pradesh State Housing Board, Reptd., by its Vice-Chairman & Housing Commissioner, Gruhakalpla, M.J.Road, Hyderabad and another. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: None appeared Counsel for the respondents: Sri D.Ranganatha Kumar for R.1. None for R.2. This Court made the following: ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1 in issuing proceedings, dated 12-1-2010, insisting on payment of Rs.82,500/- towards 10% cost for construction of LIG double bed room flat at Venture-II, Phase-IV of Kukatpally, without considering the request of the petitioner for extension of time, vide: her letter dated 29-1-2010, as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. Sri D.Ranganath Kumar, learned Standing counsel for A.P. Housing Board-respondent No.1, on instructions, submitted that immediately after giving letter, dated 29-1-2010, to respondent No.1 seeking extension of time for payment of the said amount by two months, the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition; and that respondent No.1 has taken a decision to extend the time by two months for payment of the amounts in respect of every one, including the petitioner, which was published in Eenadu Telugu Daily on 19-2-2010. In view of the above submission of the learned Standing Counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel, interim order, dated 3-2-2010, is vacated and WPMP No.2616 of 2010 is disposed of as infructuous. ------------------------------------- C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:20-9-2011 MNR