IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.74 of 2009 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF-CUM-SPECIAL SECRETARY, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, SOUTH BIHAR CIRCLE, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, BIHAR PATNA 5. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, SOUTH BIHAR CIRCLE, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, BIHAR PATNA 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER-CUM-ENQUIRY OFFICER, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, BIHAR PATNA 7. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, BIHAR, PATNA 8. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PATNA Versus SUBODH SINGH S/O SHRI RAJESHWAR PRASAD SINGH, R/O QR. NO. C/1, BANK ROAD, P.S.-KOTWALI, DISTRICT- PATNA ----------- For the appellants :- AC to SC-3 ---------------- 3 10/02/2009 Respondents- appellants, aggrieved by the order dated 18.12.2007 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No. 10604 of 2007, have preferred this appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. AC to SC-3 appears on behalf of the appellants. The learned Single Judge quashed the order of suspension as in its opinion it smacks of bias and malafide in law. For the same reason the learned Single Judge had quashed the charge. We are of the opinion that the conclusion arrived at by the learned Single Judge is on consideration of relevant - 2 - material which cannot be said to be illegal in any way. This appeal stands dismissed in limine. (Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, ACJ.) (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) avin