IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1753 of 2005 RAM NIWAS SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 6.1.2010 In the supplementary show cause filed on behalf of opposite party No.2, the District Magistrate, Jehanabad, it is stated that the necessary order has been passed by him on 24.9.2005 in compliance with the order dated 31.1.2005 under contempt, by which the claim of the petitioner has been rejected. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the order under contempt stands complied with though he does not accept that it is a correct order. The contempt application is, accordingly dismissed. The petitioner, if aggrieved by the aforesaid order, may challenge the same in appropriate proceedings. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )