IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 294 of 2008 (M/S) Mohan Lal …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …… Respondents …….. Mr. P.C.Jhingan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Brief Holder for respondent no. 1. Mr. B.D.Upadhyaya, Advocate for respondent no. 2. Mr. D.S.Patni, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C. J. Vide judgment dated 08.11.2004, Additional District Judge / Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Tehri Garhwal has clearly issued an injunction against the persons concerned against evicting the petitioner from the tin-shed in question forcibly. In the said judgment, a clear observation was also made that petitioner can be or could be evicted by adopting the procedure prescribed under law. Whereas the concerned authorities were restrained from evicting the petitioner forcibly, they were also given liberty to initiate proceedings for his eviction by adopting due procedure. That liberty still continues. But, until the petitioner is in occupation, the respondents could not circumvent the aforesaid judgment of the Court by disconnecting the electricity or water supply. In this background, disconnecting the electricity or water supply, definitely would amount to frustrate, disobey or circumvent the judgment of the Civil Court. The petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to re-connect the electricity and water supply within two weeks from today. This is subject to the petitioner’s paying all dues and charges. (V. K. Gupta, C. J.) 18.09.2008 A