1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3769 OF 2005 IN APPEAL (L) NO.1283 OF 2005 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2803 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO.2648 OF 1995 Smt.Suparna Tapan Das .. Appellant v/s. Shri Alok Ajit Pal & ors. .. Respondents Mr.Pankaj Kavli i/by Mr.U.M.Jhaveri for the appellant. Ms.Susan Abraham i/by Mr.Prakash Mahadik for the respondents. CORAM : R.M.LODHA AND ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 9th January, 2006 P.C. Heard. 2. There is delay of 20 days in filing the appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the notice of motion, we are satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause in filing the appeal in time. We, accordingly, condone the delay in filing the appeal. 3. Notice of motion is disposed of. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA, J.) LODHA, J.) LODHA, J.) (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)