IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 17591 of 2002 Between: M/s.Bhagyalakshmi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., rep.by it's President K.Koteswara Rao,Office at No.104, 1st Floor , Anuradha Apartments , Srinagar Colony,Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 T.R.Ashok Kumar, s/o. late T.R.Ratnaiah, R/o. 3-10-4,Trimulgherry, Secunderabad. 2 The Deputy Register of Co-operative Societies (Housing ), Office: Near Exhibition Grounds, M.J.Road, Hyderabad. 3 The Registrar , Co-operative Tribunal, Hyderabad , A.P., .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in C.T.ANo.127/2000 on the file of Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad and quash the orders dt.7.5.2000 passed in C.T.A.No.127/2000 and consequently set aside the order dt.6.3.2000 passed in A.R.C.No. 22/1999 on the file of 2nd respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.RAMAKRISHNA Counsel for the respondent No.1: Mr. P. Sridhar Reddy. Counsel for the Respondent No.2 and 3: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : O R D E R: The President of the petitioner-society by name K.Koteshwara Rao filed a withdrawal memo stating that the petitioner-society has entered into an agreement with the respondent and therefore, the managing committee of the Society authorised him to withdraw the writ petition and accordingly sought permission for the same. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions about the withdrawal memo filed by the petitioner-society, but, he could not dispute the signature of its President contained in the withdrawal memo from that of the vakalat. As the petitioner-society represented by its President wants to withdraw the present writ petition, I do not see any objection for permitting the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the memo filed by the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J Dated:04-03-2005 CCM To 1 The Deputy Registrar of Co-op., Societies (Housing) Office, Near Exhibition Grounds, M.J.Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Registrar, Co-operative Tribunal, A.P., Hyderabad. 3. Two CCs to GP for Cooperation, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 4 2 CD copies