IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34025 of 2009 PRADEEP KUMAR SINHA @ PRADEEP KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 26.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The offence alleged is under sections 376, 511/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that from the allegations on the face of it no offence can be said to be made out for the offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. At best, it is a case under Section 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer bail and submits that in view of the nature of allegation, petitioner is not entitled to privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, Accordingly, prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected. However, in case, petitioner surrenders in the court below and makes an application for regular bail, the same would be considered on its own merits without being prejudiced by the present order. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)