IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11084 of 2010 ARBIND KUMAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 19.05.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for offences punishable under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act and Section 35 of Explosive Substance Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he was not named in the F.I.R. but subsequently he has been implicated in the present case due to the statements of co- accused Babloo. He further submits that the said Babloo had specifically stated that before the occurrence, the petitioner had fled away. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the abovenamed petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M, Patna City in connection with Malsalami P.S.Case No.212 of 2009. V.K. Pandey (S.N.Hussain, J.)