IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41651 of 2008 AKHILESH RAY, SON OF PRAHALAD RAY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BAIKUNTHPUR, P.S.- GARKHA, DISTRICT- SARAN AT CHAPRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22/10/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in paragraph 16 of the petition. Altogether five persons are named as accused but allegation against the petitioner is of firing and causing injury on the informant’s minor son aged about six years on his below the knee of right leg. Shanti Devi also received injury on account of assault. Submission is that section 307 of the Indian Penal Code is not made out because there was no intention to cause murder. There was no intervening circumstances. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. The implication is on account of the fact that the petitioner’s father lodged a case vide Garkha P.S. Case No. 126 of 2006 against Pannu Lal Rai and others including Dina Rai and Ramjeevan Rai and after investigation case was found to be true under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was opposed by the learned counsel for the informant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Akhilesh Ray is directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the - 2 - like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Saran at Chapra in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 194 of 2007. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)