HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.7095 of 2010 30th March 2010 Between: Dr. S.Venugopal … PETITIONER(S) and The Chief Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, G.H.M.C. Building, Lower Tank Bund, Hyderabad and another … RESPONDENT(S) HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.7095 of 2010 ORDER: Heard Sri D.V.Sudhir Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Corporation. At their request the Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission. The petitioner herein claims to be the owner of a house admeasuring 230 sq. yards bearing H.No.2-2-185/55/4/A & B (Mega City No.938) and H.No.2-2-185/55/4/C (Mega City No.937), situated at Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad, having purchased it from his vendors through registered sale deed in document no.1009 of 2009 dated 29.04.2009 in the office of the Sub-Registrar, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad. According to the petitioners there existed an old building on the land which they purchased; the said building was assigned municipal door number; and was assessed to property tax. The petitioner claims to have approached the respondent-Corporation for grant of permission for construction of the building. It is his case that the application submitted by them was not entertained on the ground that the TSLR Certificate and the “No Objection Certificate” from the revenue authorities was not annexed thereto. Both counsel would agree that the subject matter of this Writ Petition is covered by a judgment of this Court in HYDERABAD POTTERIES PRIVATE LIMITED vs. COLLECTOR, HYDERABAD DISTRICT AND ANOTHER[1]. Following the said judgment, this Writ Petition is also disposed of directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s application for grant of building permission without insisting upon his furnishing the TSLR Certificate and No Objection Certificate from the Revenue Department. The respondent-Corporation shall ensure that the plan submitted by the petitioner is in accordance with the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955, the Rules and Regulations made thereunder, the building bye-laws and any other statutory provisions which are required to be adhered to for grant of permission for reconstruction of the building in question. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. However, in the circumstances, without costs. _____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J 30th March 2010 CVRK/asp [1] 2001 (3) ALD 600