THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI W.P.No.32403 of 2010 Date: 18.01.2011 Between : Nakirikanti Manikantha Rao … Petitioner and Union of India, Rep.by its Secretary, Information and Broadcasting, New Delhi and others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI W.P.No.32403 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed with the following relief:- “…...Writ of Mandamus (i) declaring the inaction of the respondent no.1 in regulating the telecast of untrue and fabricated news of Shri Kalki Bhagwan as illegal and ultra to the provisions of Art. 19 & 25 of the Constitution of India and also mandatory provisions of “Cable Television Network (Regulation) Act-1995” framed therein on the subject besides being violation of principles of natural justice and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case; (ii) direct respondent no.4 to 9 to produce all relevant evidential material to substantiate the news telecasted and may direct respondents 4 to 9 to conduct experiments, to disprove at their own cost, all the above mentioned experiments in the affidavit from point no. 4 to 10 which fall in the first 1 to 3 levels of the principle of Evidence Based Practice (EBP) out of the 9 levels prescribed by the International Standards and if respondents 4 to 9 fail to prove the same to substantiate their allegations they should telecast news about their failure of experiments and at the same time telecast the correctness of the experiments mentioned in point no.4 to 10 along with the actual facts of the oneness university i.e. about its inception, aims & objectives and the constitution which is striving to bring to light the greatest glory of the Indian culture along with the evidences submitted in this affidavit entirely at free of cost in a series of episodes with similar enthusiasm; (iii) and issue consequential direction not to allow from in any manner telecasting or publishing until all the care and provision in the statute are complied with.….” 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner, after being confronted with the question as to how the petitioner could maintain the writ petition in the absence of the head of the institution having any grievance, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 3. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, at the admission stage. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI 18.01.2011 Msr/ysk THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI W.P.No.32403 of 2010 18.01.2011 (Msr/Ysk)