1 S23 S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.6190/2009. Sita Ram Vs. The State of Rajasthan Date of Order :: 24th November 2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. Shambhoo Singh, for the petitioner. Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi,Public Prosecutor for State. .... BY THE COURT The learned counsel for the petitioner has pressed on the bail plea of the petitioner particularly with the submissions that the petitioner is in custody since the year 2006 and then the trial of this case relating to offences under Sections 302, 307, 450, 323, 325, 149 IPC proceeded too but, for the arrest of certain other accused persons later, the witnesses have been re-summoned and the process of further trial is only leading to delay in disposal of the matter; and for the co- accused persons having been granted bail, and no specific injury in relation to the weapon attributed to the petitioner being directly available on the record, the petitioner also deserves to be granted bail. After taking into comprehension the totality of the facts and circumstances and more particularly the fact that as many as 13 witnesses have already been examined in the matter and looking to the nature of accusations, it does not appear 2 appropriate to grant indulgence to the petitioner in this bail application but then, looking to the age of the sessions trial and the overall facts and circumstances, it is considered appropriate and hence observed that if the petitioner makes the request before the learned Trial Court for expeditious proceedings, the same be given due consideration and the matter be attempted to be decided with expedition. With the observations aforesaid, this bail application moved on behalf of the petitioner Sita Ram s/o Deva Ram under Section 439 Cr.P.C. stands rejected. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. s.soni