IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc. Ivth Bail Appl. No. 2259/2010 Radheyshyam VS. State of Rajasthan Dated : 26.02.2010 HON'BLE MR. MAHESH BHAGWATI,J. Mr. Pradeep Mathur, for the petitioner. Mr. GS Fauzdar, Special P.P. for JVVNL. *** This order governs the disposal of IVth bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. by Shri Pradeep Mathur, Advocate on behalf of the applicant Radheyshyam pertaining to F.I.R. No.212/2008 of police station Kaithoon, District Kota, in the offence under Section 136 of Indian Electricity Act, 2003. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the material on record. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for JVVNL has opposed the bail petition. 4. Having considered the submissions made at the bar and perused the relevant material available on record, I do not find any good ground to change my earlier view and this Ivth bail petition is dismissed on those very grounds as enumerated in first bail order Dt.27.02.2009. -2- 5. In the result, the bail petition filed under Section 439 of CR.P.C. on behalf of the accused petitioner Radhey Shayam S/o Shri Ramlal stands dismissed. 6. Vide order dated 31/08/2009, the learned trial Court was directed to expedite and conclude the trial preferably within a period of three months but on account of the Advocates being on strike for about 4-5 months the trial could not be progressed. The strike has been called off by the advocates only in January, 2010. 7. Since the petitioner has been in custody for quite a long time, the learned trial Court is again directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order. In case, the trial is not concluded, the learned trial Court is directed to apprise this Court with the status of the trial, alongwith an explanation for not complying with the time frame. (MAHESH BHAGWATI)J. Pcg