1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1608 OF 2009 Laxmikanth G. Khanolkar ..Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondents Mr. A. B. Vagyani i/b. Mr. M. A. Patil for Petitioner. Mr. S. S. Pednekar – APP for State. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. DATED : 27TH JULY, 2009. P.C. : 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard by consent. 2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner relies on and refers to R.C. Book in which the Petitioner’s name appears as owner of the vehicle in question after he said to have purchased it from the ICICI Bank. It appears from paragraph 13 of the Order that this R.C. Book or any other similar document was not before the learned trial court. As a result the trial court came to the conclusion that the vehicle cannot be handed over to the Petitioner. Having regard to the importance of the document, in the interest of justice, the impugned order is set aside. The Petitioner shall be at liberty 2 to make a fresh application for return of the vehicle in accordance with law after producing R.C. Book of the vehicle or such other relevant material as may be permissible. The trial Court shall decide the matter afresh on merits. Having regard to the nature of the property, the trial court shall decide the application expeditiously. Order accordingly. 3. Rule disposed of. (S. A. BOBDE, J.)