IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.Rev. No. 18 of 2011 Decided on: 16.3.2011 State of H.P. and others …Petitioners Versus Rajinder Paul …Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioners : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the respondent : None Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : There is no error apparent on the face of record. Consequently, there is not merit in the present petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge March 16, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?