IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21132 of 2011 Anil Singh @ Guddu Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- Lawyer for Petitioner- Mr. Girish Chandra Sharma-Adv. Lawyer for State- Mr. T. Sharma- A.P.P. --------- 03. 11.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is alleged for making demand of ransom with threatening by his mobile with further allegation that on his direction when informant’s servant Moti Ram went with Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) his money was snatched. Mobile and its SIM number are seized from the possession of this petitioner. He is uncle of the informant in no way minimizes the gravity of the offence. There is no any document to show the enmity in between the parties. Accordingly, petitioner’s prayer for regular bail stands rejected. However, petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer after framing of the charge. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)