IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7378 of 2010 LAL BABU RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 28.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he participated in the notice inviting tender relating to PMGSY package no. BR-23R-002 which related to Bariarpur to Bharatpur road in the district of Muzaffarpur. According to him he has filed his financial bid in two envelops but the steno of the Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department did not forward the second envelop which he accepts was on the account of mistake on the part of the steno. The above fact has been brought to the notice of the Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Works Department vide communication dated 7.4.2010 but instead of any response on the issue a fresh advertisement for the same work has been invited which would be evident from perusal of Hindustan Daily Newspaper dated 23.4.2010 contained in annexure-2. With the limited grievance of the petitioner this writ application is disposed of with a direction upon the Engineer- in-Chief to get the matter verified and inform the petitioner of the outcome of the said verification. If the allegation made by the petitioner is established to be true then the authority may consider taking appropriate remedial measure so far as the fresh tender is concerned. - 2 - Since new advertisement has already been issued, the Court expects a communication to be made to the petitioner preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of communication or production of a copy of this order. This writ application is disposed of with the above direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)