THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.3497 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner and respondents 3 and 4 are brothers. They own a tobacco barren in common. The petitioner filed O.S.No.259 of 2009 in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Giddalur, for partition, against respondents 3 and 4, and it is said to be pending. Respondents 3 and 4 applied for renewal of their licence, in respect of the barren. The liecence is said to have been renewed. The petitioner seeks a declaration to the effect that the action of respondents 1 and 2 in renewing the licence is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2. Admittedly, the petitioner has approached the civil Court for partition. Respective shares, vis-à-vis the barren, are to be determined by that Court. The only ground urged by the petitioner, vis-à-vis renewal of licence, is the pendency of the suit. Unless the petitioner had obtained an order of temporary injunction, the action of respondents 1 and 2 cannot be found fault with. The Writ Petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his remedies in the pending suit. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.17.02.2010. GJ