IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No.75 of 2008 Order on the Bail cancellation application. CRIMINAL SIDE Riayasat S/o Akhtar ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ------- Opposite party Dated: December 17, 2009 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Adv. for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. GA for the State as well as Mr. H.C. Pathak, Adv. for the respondents. By way of this bail cancellation application, the applicant has prayed to cancel the bail of the respondents no.2 to 7 granted by this Court on 13.12.2005, 20.12.2005 and 22.3.2006 respectively. The sole ground raised by the learned counsel for the applicant for cancellation of bail is that the applicants-accused are threatening the witnesses. It is admitted by the learned counsel for the parties that all the prosecution witnesses have been examined before the trial court and the case is now fixed for final arguments. In view of this situation, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the bail cancellation application has been rendered infructuous. The bail cancellation application is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. However, the trial court is directed to decide the trial expeditiously. (Dharam Veer, J.) 17.12.2009 Rajeev Dang