IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST AUGUST 2011 / 9TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23571 of 2011(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- NISHANA M.A., D/O.M.K.ARUMUGHAN, AGED 22 YEARS, "ANUGRAHA", KALLAMPARAMBU, DHONI P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673635. SC SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 23571 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBIT EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 23.8.11 (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).23571/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 31st day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioner applied for revaluation of 8th semester B.Tech 'Information Technology' Engineering Examination vide Ext.P1 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within ten weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. 4.Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs