IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-37775 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 14.12.2011 Bhupesh Wadhwa and others …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondents ………. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. *** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners has vehemently argued that offences punishable under Section 420 and 406 IPC can be compounded with the leave of the Court as provided under Section 320 (2) Cr.P.C. He has further argued that parties were relegated to Mediation and Conciliation Centre and with the effort of Mediation and Conciliation Centre matter has been settled amicably between the parties. He has further stated that even police has recorded the statements of both the parties to the effect that matter has been settled. He seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to move an appropriate application before the competent Magistrate under Section 320 (2) Cr.P.C. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. If application under Section 320 (2) Cr.P.C. is moved before the competent Magistrate seeking leave of the Court to compound the offence, learned Magistrate shall pass order thereon in accordance with law within 30 days. ( Alok Singh ) December 14, 2011 Judge Anand