1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTON CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1378 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.95 OF 2009 Ashok Hanumanta Kajari .. Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.V.V.Ingawale for the Applicant. Mr.D.P.Adsule, APP for the State. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR AND V.M.KANADE, JJ. DATE: 10th December, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. Perused the relevant material on record. There is overwhelming evidence to indicate the complicity of the applicant. The eye witnesses have spoken about the involvement of the applicant, which evidence has remained unchallenged. Beside, the incriminatary evidence of blood-stained clothes has also gone unchallenged. Taking overall view of the matter, no case for bail is made out. Application is rejected. 2. At this stage, counsel for the applicant prays for expeditious hearing of the appeal. If the appeal is ready in all respects, 2 office to process the appeal as per its turn under the caption “Convicts In Jail”, which in itself is considered as expedited case as per the present assignment. As of now the appeals of the year 2002 pertaining to the said category are already on final hearing board. Hence, appeal shall proceed as per its turn under the said category. (V.M.KANADE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)