IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12475 of 2009 RAMESH KUMAR . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2 7.12.2009 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the state. I.A. No.7706 of 2009 has been filed by Guddu Kumar Son of Shri Parmanand Singh, for being impleaded as respondent, as he is the person who was selected for appointment in Husaina Gram Panchayat. The petitioner has challenged the selection process of Husaina Gram Panchayat. The Intervener- respondent’s prayer is that he should be impleaded being a necessary party in the writ application. I.A. aforesaid is allowed and Guddu Kumar is impleaded as respondent no.13 in this writ application. Petitioner has filed this application for quashing the order dated 12.8.2000 passed by the Member, Appellate Tribunal, Nalanda at Biharsharif, in appeal No. 324 of 2009 contained in memo No. 286. The Appellate Authority by the impugned order has rejected the prayer of the petitioner for cancelling the counselling conducted by Husaina Gram Panchayat in Sarmera Block in the district of Nalanda for 2 panchayat teacher’s appointment. On perusal of the impugned order, I find this finding recorded by the Appellate Tribunal that on the same day counselling was going on in Mirnagar Gram Panchayat, where the petitioner has participated and also been selected for the post of Panchayat Teacher. Petitioner did not participate ind the counselling at Husaina Panchayat.. In this view of the matter, so far Husaina Panchayat is concerned, I find that the petitioner did not participate in the counselling. Considering this finding, I do not find any error in the order impugned. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar