3; Th^ Director iGenerai of Polic-e, Police Headquartsr- Raipnr(CG). 4. TheDiree1;9F,Ge|!iei-alofPQlice, Special Foree, Bhilai Distt.Durg (CG). 5. The Director General ofPolice, Police Headquarter, BhopaI(MP). 6. Centrai Ciovernment (Union of India) through- Secretary; Pub'ic Grievance, Khaii Market, New Delhi. ^r ••vaf OVRFT PETmON WFDER ABTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjTIONOF INDIA) ISB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Aenihoti-*. J.V Pr<=l(.:-f*nt ^f'n w 'l tl! m M Sahu Mtss Pushpa D^.^'fidi, Advocate for tiie petitioners. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, DeputyGovt. Advocate for the State. Shri K.asliifShskiL A;dvQic3t'£fbs'ths rssDoudent'No. 6.. ORALORDER i (Fitssed wi G711' day ufMay, 2008) Witl-' the consent oftiis parties, the inatter 's take" up for hearing 'finalSy. • ! . ;, , . . • ^ , '. . . • Learued fcounse! appearing for the petitionei-s sr.bm'ts that she does npt waiit to press this petition on rnent except tiiat the petitioners be pemutted to make a represenlation to the Comaiittpe m the Hght ofthe judgment and order dated 17 April, 2007 passed by this Court in B.R, C'odbole Vs. Mimicipal Corporation Durg and othei-s {2007 (2) CGLJ 417}p to whicli Isamed counse! npp<&aii£ig fbr tibe otliei' side have;i[o ohiiF-^^tioTi- ~ '] \ Accordingly, Ae petition 's d'spose4 of in fhe same terms i.e, fbs Cominittee so coastrtuted is 4ireGted to consider the represeBtaffi&as:yj£ made by 'fhe petitioners, if .their^ reprssentabons.; srS tiof consi{Ia^dyit||J 9W't earlier. I" .th". event, ,if tt.is not considered .eariiei, the i&]esli3i|;!£ reprssentation may be considered, as early as possible within a pei{l9di||»l| offbw mpnths from the 3ate ofreceipt|Bfrepresenta;tion. This ^xe,^tasej.j|j||^ .pn the part of the Govenunent bf India may be compl^ted .5Vttliljn|^j3|s? period o.F&nr months fi-om tfie date ofreceipt ofacopy of:t!Ms^cinipF.i |!|||||>i SdA iffi; . SatishK.Agnihotri |||| Judge l'«f;;'! ^ilB ;a;KI '^:.!;J:5:;i .;^^i s,Mff/ SiBIB G iil'J sfliII m