1 cac340.11 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 340 OF 2011 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICAITON ST. NO. 6842 OF 2011 Ardeshri K. Dhondy. ....Applicant. Vs. Mrs. Mehroo Ganesh Udyavar & ors. ....Respondents. Mr. Rajendra R. Rathod, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. J.S. Deo, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Zubin Behramkamdin i/b. M/s. FZB & Asso. Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5. CORAM:- GIRISH GODBOLE, J DATED:- AUGUST 26, 2011 P.C. 1. The Applicant had initially filed a Writ Petition, which was allowed to be withdrawn by Order dated 12/1/2011 with liberty to file CRA which is filed on 21/2/2011. The time taken to file and prosecute Writ Petition bonafide will have to be excluded. Hence, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Prayer clause (b) is identical and hence need not be granted once prayer clause (a) is granted. Office to number CRA and list the same as per CMIS. (GIRISH GODBOLE, J)