IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1631 of 2008 BIRENDRA KUMAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 24.9.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. While this Court would not accept the submission of the counsel for the petitioner as with regard to the impugned order allowing impleadment of intervener, inasmuch as if the court below has found presence of the intervener to be necessary for disposal of the suit, this Court in exercise of its power under section 115 C.P.C. would not like to interfere with such exercise of direction in terms of Order-1 Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure but the apprehension of the petitioner that the suit of the year 1992 may be delayed on account of delaying tactics adopted by the intervener now impleaded as a defendant has to be definitely taken note of. This Court would, therefore, direct the court below to ensure that the newly added defendant is not permitted to unnecessarily linger the suit and as the suit is of the year 1992 the court below would be under obligation to dispose of the 2 suit within a period of one year from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. With the aforementioned observation and direction this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/