Civil Revision No.2023 of 2009 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2023 of 2009 Date of Decision: 17.4.2009 Anju Bala ......Petitioner Versus Punjab and Sind Bank and another .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. Present: Shri Kulbir Shekhon, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J (Oral). The challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned trial Court on 24.01.2009, whereby an application filed by the plaintiff for permission to lead additional evidence, was allowed. The argument raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that by allowing the additional evidence, the plaintiff has been permitted to fill up the lacunae in the evidence, which is not permissible. Vide the impugned order in the revision petition, the plaintiff has been permitted to examine the Hand Writing Expert, to prove the documents allegedly signed by the defendant (the present petitioner). Such evidence would be relevant and necessary for the proper determination of the suit. The defendant- petitioner will have a right to rebut the evidence so led by the plaintiff. Therefore, the petitioner cannot be said to have suffered any prejudice, when the plaintiff is permitted to lead additional evidence. Consequently, I do not find any patent illegality or material Civil Revision No.2023 of 2009 (2) irregularity in the impugned order, which may warrant interference by this Court, in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 17.04.2009 ds