@o f wa; g Pmm w\%_ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (QHHATTISGARH) W.P. s No.‘ 210 2010 PETITIONER : /' Girdhar Lal Yadav, S/o. Shri Kartik Ram Yadav, aged about 43 years, R/o. Mukam 85 Post — ...... .. ’ Lohsi, Tahsil 86 Distt. Dhamtari 'l I ' ...‘.. (C.G.) V ERSUS RESPONDENTS /(1) State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division (Samanya), Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) (3) Depot Officer, office of Depot Offlcer (forest), Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA W ‘{' ‘ “I- we FM W mm N’Ptb)%7l O) W 2 WEI Wm WW mmmafsa WWI§WW % 31Wm t 5.3.: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. PRITEENKER DIWAKER 09 12 2010 Shri Vinod Dcshmukh, counsel Smt. Smita Ghai, P.L. fror the Grn’evance of the petitioner in though he is entitled for his regumn‘za‘don Guard, he has been regularized on Counsel for the petitioner ave completed all the formalities f0 avour of the petitioner and therefore may be permitted to Withdraw the to me a fresh. representation before same may be directed to be decided expeditiously as possible. Counsel for the State submits the fact he cannot make any Government is Willing to regularize on the post of Forest Guard or tobjection if the petitioner makes a authority concerned and the accordance with law. /, Accordingly, the petition is that in the event of any representation before respondent No.2 raising his fer the petitioner. Skate. the present petin'on is that on the post of Forest f1e post ofwatchman. submits that the respondents r passing necessaxy Older in at this stage the petitioner plesent petition with liberty respondent No.2 and the in accordance with law as that without ascertaining statement whether the State 1he services of the petitioner not. However, he has no representation before the sane is decided by it in disposed of with a direction, flied by the petitioner grievances, the same. is [mi-95 tie . ............................... ..............................................m .......... ......W 200 mmmm WW WW awtmsném authority concerned in decided by the xpected to be ccordance with law as expedin'ousl y as possible. It is made clear that this Cc opinion on merits of the case an would be at liberty to decide the rep strictly in accordance with law. vurt has not, expressed any d the authon'ty concerned resentation of the petitioner _g Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge we aw e a