IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 794 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 35 OF 2010 SHRI. CHANDRAKANT BABU NAIK AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus SHRI. ROHIDAS SUKDO NAIK AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. G. Shirodkar, Advocate for the Applicants. Ms. R. Kantak, Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 and 2. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 31st January, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. G. Shirodar, learned Counsel for the Applicants and Ms. R. Kantak, learned Counsel on behalf of Respondents Nos. 1 and 2. Ms. Kantak has filed pursis stating that respondent No. 3 has expired on 28.9.2009. The same is taken on record. She further states that she has no objection if the legal representatives of appellant No. 2 are brought on record. In view of the above, the application is allowed. The legal representatives of appellant No. 2 are ordered to be brought on record in S.A. No. 35/2010. The amendment to be carried out within one week. The application stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. MF/-