1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 77 OF 2010 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 946 OF 2010 IN MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1123 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2155 OF 2005 (Smt. Sunita Rane .v. Indorama Synthetics (I) Limited) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri Samudra Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Shri R.B. Puranik, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 28TH JANUARY, 2010. Heard. Respondent has no objection. Delay is condoned. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg. 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 946 OF 2010 IN MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1123 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2155 OF 2005 (Smt. Sunita Rane .v. Indorama Synthetics (I) Limited) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri Samudra Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Shri R.B. Puranik, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 28TH JANUARY, 2010. 1. Heard. 2. Perused the judgment of Labour Court and of learned Single Judge passed in the Writ Petition. 3. Admittedly order of learned Labour Court did not contain reason whatsoever towards 100% back wages. 4. Learned Single Judge has given some credit to workman's version that “at present she does not have the employment”, and awarded 25% back wages with further protection in Review, that excess amount if paid, should not be recovered. 5. This Court is satisfied that learned Single Judge has done full justice. 6. No indulgence is called for. LPA is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.