lg t581 :\i '* (^/^/-ao^- IN THE HIGtLCOURJOF CHHATTtSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.S.NO. S'~IG':L-/2006 PETttIONER Gaurishankar Dubey ^ -•>, v^' S/o- Motilat Dubey *5/Sr 1-— Aged about t-lQjyears, /v?"^' / - . .... . *L< .^, p'" ..••'' R/o- Milan chowk, Kududand ^A^ / \e'o^yy ?v.--^^y /" 'y^'i^ y >'^w " 6Si' ^^tp' w ' ^ RESPQNDENTS 1!°1 )|^.| MALViYA ^ wq^ ^•'-'•' < ^^ 0°:s^- ^f^-\ ^[1^y c^ -^^^ Bilaspur District, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 3. StateofChhattisgarh,^ Throughthe Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan,Mantralaya, Raipur(C.G.) Adfditional Commissioner,^ Tribal Welfare Department^ Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) Collector, Bilaspur District/^ Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITtON UNDER ARTICLE 226^^F ^THE CONSTTTUtIONOF INDIA 1. PARTECULARS OFTHE PETITIONER As mentiQned above in the cause title. ^t HI6H COURT OF JUDICATUKE CHHATTIS6ARI-1: BILASPUR Si»gte Bench: Hon'ble Shri Sattsh K. Agnihotri. J. W.P.falNoSlOZofZate Petitioner 6auridi<mkar Dubey Versus Respondents State of Chhatt-isgarh & others Mr. Anand Kumar Tiwarj, counselfor the petitioner. Mr. V.V.S. Moorthy, I:>eputy Advocate Senerat with Smt. Anju Ahujd,Depu1y66vernmentAdvoc<rfefortherespondents/State. ORDER (T* Nowmber, 2006) 1. Mr. V.V.S. Moorthy, leamed &epu'ty Advocate 6er»rdl with Mrs. Anju Ahyja, learned Oeputy fiovernment Advocate oppearing fbr •Hie respondentS/State submits 1hat the petition has become infruchwus as the impugned order chted 28.7.2006 ^Aniwxure P/2) has been withdrawn by order dated 225.2006 (Annewjre R/l) and -the petjtipner has been granted salary as per revision on the basis of 5 Pdy Commission. , 2. Mr. Anand famar Tiwari.learned counsel appearing for the petitionerdgrees with the submissions made by laarned counsel 1 cppearing for the reSpondents/State. 3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as haying become infruc-hjous. No orderasto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge :u