1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3750/2008 Amba Bai and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 27.7.2010 HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J. Mr. S.P. Sharma, for the petitioners. Mr. P.C. Sharma, for the respondents. Counsel for the petitioners states that the controversy involved in this petition for writ is no more res integra in view of the Division Bench judgment in D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.467/2009 (Bheru Lal and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.). I have gone through the judgment aforesaid wherein Division Bench of this Court quashed the declaration made by the State government under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act of 1894' hereinafter). The notification which was subject matter in the appeal that came to be decided by the judgment referred above is also subject matter of instant petition for writ. The contention raised in this writ petition to challenge the notification dated 5.10.2007 are the same as considered by 2 the Division Bench in the judgment dated 18.5.2010. Accordingly, this petition for writ too is allowed to the extent that the declaration under Section 6 of the Act of 1894 is made on 5.10.2007 is quashed and set-aside, and the report is made by OSD on 27.2.2007 is also quashed and set-aside. The authorities are, however, left free to proceed in the matter but strictly in accordance with law and while keeping in view the observations made in the judgment dated 18.5.2010. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. RM/