IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22599 of 2010 BINDESHRI SARDAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 20.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Dacoity is reported against unknown miscreants. Petitioner’s name appeared in confession of co-accused Jai Kishore Yadav and Dhirendra Yadav but petitioner is informant’s villager. Really, if petitioner was a participant of dacoity, he should be named and now, all the victims on solemn affirmation state that petitioner was not present in dacoity. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 12 of 2008 corresponding to G.R. No. 298 of 2008 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Araria subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)