IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 8856 of 2008 Between: Sanapala Srinivasa Rao S/o. S. Appa Rao R/o. H.NO.5-115, Narava Village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Home, Secretarait Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam. 3 Asst. Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam. 4 Circle Inspector of Police, Pendurthi Police Station, Visakhapatnam. 5 Sub Inspector of Police, Pendurthi Police Station, Visakhapatnam. 6 Gandreddi Kanakamahalakshmi Naidu S/o. Sriramulu R/o. Peda Narava Village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam. 7 Gandreddi Srinivasa Rao S/o. Sriramulu R/o. Peda Narava Village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.VENUGOPAL FOR MR.T.C.D.SEKHAR Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR HOME Counsel for Respondent Nos.6 and 7: --- The Court made the following : Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: ‘It is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, preferably a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.1 to 5 herein in supporting respondent Nos.6 and 7 herein in interfering with petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property, namely dry land admeasuring Ac.2.40 cents, situated in Survey Nos.24/1 and 24/4 of Narava Village, Pendurthy Mandal, Visakhapatnam, which is subject matter of civil suit O.S.No.130 of 2007 now pending on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam District, as being illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India; and consequently direct respondent Nos.1 to 5 herein not to harass the petitioner by foisting false cases in connection with the subject matter of civil suit O.S.No.130 of 2007 now pending on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam District; and to pass such other and further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.’ Having regard to the contents of the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.4, Sri P.Venugopal, learned Counsel representing Sri T.C.D.Sekhar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, sought for permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. The request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is accepted. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.11744 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ____________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 29th April, 2008 LUR