WP(C) 86/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE BK SHARMA The matter relates to Anganwadi Worker in Rupahi Bill Kadamtola Chuburi Anganwad i Centre No.334 of Morigaon district. According to the petitioner, the Respondent No.5 could not have been app ointed she being not a resident of the Anganwadi Centre in question. As per t he affidavit filed, the Respondent No.5 is a resident of the Anganwadi Centre in question. As to whether the Respondent No.5 is a resident of the particular Centre or not, same cannot be decided by writ Court. If the petitioner is aggrieved by appoint ment of the Respondent No.5 on the ground of being not a resident of the particu lar Anganwadi Centre, it will be appropriate for her to file an appropriate repr esentation before the Director of Social Welfare, Assam agitating her grievance preferably within two weeks. If such representation is made, the Director may de cide the same after hearing all the parties involved. With the above direction and observation, the writ petition is disposed of.