-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.915 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.915 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.915 OF 2006 Parisa Aappanna Koregave & ors. ...Appellants vs. Sumati Annaso @ Kallu Magdum & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.P.R.Arjunwadkar for the Appellants CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 6, 2007. : JULY 6, 2007. : JULY 6, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Advocate for the Appellants. Second Appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law : i) Whether the Appellate Court committed an error by not treating the property bearing Gat No.634 and 636 as ancestral property in as much as in the receipt at Exh.54, the Respondent herself stated that the said property was an ancestral property ? ii) Whether the Appellate Court committed an error by calculating the share of the Respondent on erroneous assumption that the property in question was self acquired property of Appanna ? 2. Second Appeal is admitted on the aforesaid substantial questions of law. Printing is dispensed with. The Appellants are directed to file private paper book within a period of one year from today failing which the Appeal will stand dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to the court. -2- JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE