IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23211 of 2011 Sunil Rai @ Guddu Rai ---- Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar ---- Opp. Party ----------- 2. 15.07.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody in Nasriganj P.S. Case No. 163 of 2009 giving rise to S.T. No. 348 of 2010 pending in the court of Additional Session Judge, F.T.C. II Rohtas at Sasaram. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the informant has been examined in this case as PW 3. In the sessions trial in her evidence she has not assigned specific role to the petitioner as has been assigned in the FIR. The learned counsel produced a certified copy of the evidence of PW 3. From perusal of the evidence of PW 3 who is informant in this case it appears that she has specifically stated that three persons including this petitioner killed the deceased. The prayer for bail has been rejected twice earlier. In view of the above facts, I am not inclined to give bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)