IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 20TH MAY 2010 / 30TH VAISAKHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 362 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.22463/2009 Dated 02/11/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- K.G. RAJEEVAN, S/O.K.P.GOPALAN NAIR, AGED 57, (RETIRED COMMERCIAL TAX INSPECTOR) KAMYAKAM (AREEKULAZHIKATHU VEEDU) MANJAKKALA, AAVANEESWARAM.R.S.P.O, PIN - 691 517, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. MARA PANDIAN, COMMSSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. K. JAYAMOHANAN PILLAI, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, KASARAGODE. 3. SUGATHAN, INSPECTING ASSITANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX CHECK POST, BANGARA MANJESWAR, KASARAGODE DISTRICT GP ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- C.O.C.362/2010 -------------------- Dated this the 20th day of May, 2010 JUDGMENT The only surviving complaint of the petitioner is that he has not been paid his commutation benefits. Learned Government Pleader points out that the petitioner has not submitted an application in this behalf and it is therefore, the commutation benefits have not been disbursed. If that be so, if the petitioner files an application, I see no reason why the respondents shall not consider the request of the petitioner. In view of the above, the Contempt of Court case is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs