IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11417/2008 Decided on:23.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Hans Raj. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. .…Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ansul Bansal, Addl. A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he has put in requisite number of years and has completed 240 days in each calendar year, however, his case for regularization has not been considered by the respondents. It has come in the reply filed by the respondents that the case of the petitioner shall be considered for regularization as per the policy. However, the reply was filed on 15.4.2005. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 2. Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur submits that his client has completed more than 10 years continuous service with 240 days in each calendar year. 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with the policy framed in this behalf, within a period of two months from today, with all the consequential benefits, after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 23.12.2010 *awasthi*