3006wp2815.11.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR W.P.NO.2815 of 2011 Amruta Sambhaji Bure ..vs.. Punjaram Durjan Khangar and anr. ............................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ............................................................................................................................................................... Mr. S.C.Mehadia, Adv. for the petitioner. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : 30th June, 2011. 1. The above petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India takes exception to the order dated 11/3/2011 passed by the learned (Ad hoc) District Judge -I, Akola, by which order the application, Exh.15 filed by the petitioner herein came to be rejected. The petitioner is the appellant who has suffered a decree in Reg.C.S.No.143 of 2003. The petitioner has filed an appeal against the said decree, which is numbered as Reg.Civil Appeal No.102 of 2007. In the said appeal, by having recourse to Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the petitioner wanted to produce the document which is purported to be report filed by one Dadarao Mahadeorao Bure in the Police station against the petitioner. The Trial Court has rejected the said application observing that the said document is not necessary for adjudication of the appeal. The Trial Court was also of the view that said document was available with the petitioner at 3006wp2815.11.odt 2 the time of the suit being decided and therefore, the petitioner could not be permitted to produce the said document at the appellate stage. The reasoning given by the Trial Court i.e. the First Appellate Court cannot be faulted with. No interdiction is called for in the writ jurisdiction. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE chute