THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22706 of 2010 Date:13.09.2010 Between: M. Yadi Reddy. ..... Petitioner AND The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District and others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Avinash Desai for Sri S. Niranjan Reddy Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue Counsel for Respondent Nos.4 to 23: --. The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1 in not taking up for consideration, the appeal filed by the petitioner and numbered as F1/1718/2010 as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner sought for a consequential direction to respondent No.1 to decide the appeal. I have heard Sri Avinash Desai, learned counsel representing Sri S. Niranjan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and perused the record. Against the order of respondent No.2 granting Occupancy Rights Certificate (ORC) in favour of respondent Nos.4 to 6, the petitioner claimed to have filed an appeal on 02.07.2010 which is stated to have been taken on file and numbered as F1/1718/2010. The petitioner pleaded that respondent No.1 has posted the case to 07.08.2010 for consideration and that on the said date, he has neither taken up the case nor adjourned the case to a specific date. Having regard to the innocuous nature of the relief claimed by the petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.1 to dispose of the appeal, in accordance with law, after giving notices to respondent Nos.4 to 23 within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.Nos.28961 and 28962 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim reliefs are disposed of as infructuous ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 13th September, 2010 GHN