c . ? -^°'{' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURfC.G.) PETITIONER ^^ f*B v^--r'^y> ^€^5//~ u<<%^" yy^ .c^y .***' ^ . RESPONDENTS W.P. N0. ^-6^2- 12QQS - Vijay Khalkho, aged about-47 yrs, s/0-Johan Khalkho , r/o-Gandhi Chowk.qyarter no-F-'l , Ambikapur, Dist-Sarguja,(C.G.) VERSUS :1. StateofChhattisgarh ^ Through : Secretary Department of Finance, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, - || Dist -Sarguja gs 3. Director , Treasury & Pension, Ratpur.(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICl.E 226/2270P THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 34 ^^ ^^ *tm<9t^7!W 'd?:^T<ii«irt«,y-^lwis, Bcii'Hy^ .w..f?.-...^.6.^.1:........ an^TTTR'fi* awan^CTditijci) SR/'FS72005-20,000 3IT^9Tqa^(^I^^,£i) <ni<<in<tli <ii«inV<t"fe'^1 'tRil'WI'i ^ari^Tan^ST W.P.No.4642/200$ Shri R.Pradhaa, ci unsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Akhil Agraw^l, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respohdents on advance ('opy. Heaid. I Leamed counsel ^>r fhe petitiouer subniits that fhe petitioner wUo is presen teansferred frojn Ambiki ly workuig on the post of TreasLuy Of&cer ia Distodet T|reasuiy, Ambikapur, has been >ur to District Pancliayat, Jashpur. He subiuits fhat this ttansfer is conb-ary tp the to-ansfer policy aad the traasfer ^ias been effected in the ban period. He further subinits that accordiag to the policy, fhe teansfer should be eflfected after (;oinpletion of more fhan three years at a place and the petitjoner has not completed three years atAmbikapur. He also ^ubaiits fhat the hoine district offhe petitioner is Jasfapiu- aad he should not have been transferred af his hoine (ifatrict-Jashpur. For the present, subniits that this petitio wifh a liberty to ti representation before leamed counsel for fhe petitioner ta inay be permitted to be withdrawn petitioner to ffle a detailed the conceraed authority and the conceraed aattiorily njiay be directed to dispose df his i^presentatiou within f|ie stipulated period granted by this Court. BiSSJ 35 \jCTf^||^|^^u>-(^^<|,fi^|i)t>)|^^ *tl^<!»*^W^ 3ii^?rwR-<ici> atiran^CTg^'mp >i.i'n^ 3IT$?TtRro(^c|ijc(^) g^ttSR^cT CT^?7 Z-. SP/FS/2005-20,000 This limited praye; petitto&er is not opposed " The prayer is aUow| Let fhe petitioner the coinpetent aufhoi (particularly the grievauf years at Ambikapur aud| fhe home district of represeHtation is filed by inonth irom today, before the competent s{ shaU dispose bf fhe said| preferably witbin a peri| filing/ receipt of fhe said Wifh fhe aforesaid fmaUy disposed of. Consequenfly, W\ disposed of. Certffied copy as p(; <Ri<<f'n<niim'nYff fe'^1 'tRt't^K ^ari^'qail^?! !•, inade by learaed coiuisel for the |by the State counsel. 3d. fped a detailed representation before i|ity, raising all his grievaaces |;e about non coinpletion of fhree also fhe grievaiice that Jashpur is the petitioner aad if sueh a |the petitioner wiftua a period ofone aloijgwifh certified copy of this ordei; ^ufhority, the competent authority representation as early as possible od of four weeks froin the date of representation. observations, the petition staads W.P.No.3768/2005 also stands r rules. Sd/- SunUKumarSinba Judge T '^^s^- '^iS^^^