IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.12933 of 2009 AINUL ANSARI @ AINUL HAQUE ANSARI, son of Anaitulla Ansari, resident of village- Janamghuttu, Police station- Barari, District- Katihar … Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR … OP ----------- 4/ 16.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 302,201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and from the FIR itself it is apparent that it is the petitioner, who informed about this occurrence to the informant and later on he has been made accused in this case because certain articles of the informant were recovered from the place of occurrence. It is further submitted that it is quite absurd that the person, who informs about the occurrence, would leave his articles at the place of occurrence to be detected later on so that he can be made accused. Considering the submission and the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 2.10.2007, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge, Katihar, in connection with S.T. no.51 of 2008 arising out of Korha P.S. case no.186 of 2007. Since the trial is proceeding, the petitioner is directed to be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)