.<^ c^ •o. ,rf«rf.t.. PreseBted ey Sh3t..S'..'..^'^.—..^..— dat8d....-j6..^;LL.^°^................ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fC.G.1 i WRIT PETITION f S •) NO.t-'^-^OF 2006 BETWEEN ^' 1. Smt. Ramkumari Nagdeve W/o. Shri Vijay Nagdeve, aged about 43 years, Occupation Service, Posted as Assistant teacher posted at Primary School Parsada( Bemcha) r/o. Ward No. 21 Adarsh nagar behlnd Gas Godown Mahasamund, Distt.- Mahasamund (C.G.) ^ 2. Vijaypuri Goswami S/o. Haripuri Goswami, aged about 42 years, Occupation - Service, Posted as Assistant teacher R/o. Ward No. 18 Dr. Radhakrishnan ward Kumharpara Mhasamund, Tahsil & Distt.- Mahasamund (C.G.) ^3. Smt,. Umeshwari Deewan W/0. Shri Laxman Deewan aged abourt 39 Years Occupation- Service posted as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School ^) Churki, r/o. Vitlage Churki, Post- Mohandi, P. S. ^ ^ jQ f\ ^ Bagbahara, Tahsil & Distt.- Mahasamund ( C.G.) C7 /v/4" !^'{s/ ^' ^ .vV 4. Smt. Manju Godane W/o. Shri Jaykar Godane aged about 58 years by caste mahar, occupation - Service posted as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Gourkheda, r/o. Ward No. 19 Clubpara Mahasamund, Distt. - Mahasamund ( C. G. ) PETITIONERS AND 1- Y' 2- The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Department of School Education, D.K.S. Buitding, Raipur (C.G.) The Commissioner of , Tribal Welfare Development Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) <"^,:- 'iss'ss.ssisa^sisssssswssj^-^jg^^^vss^^^^^s ^ <'' 3- District Education officer, Mahasamund, Distt.- Mahasamund (C.G.) 4- The Director, public Instruction pension Bada Raipur Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) ^ RESPONDENTS WRFT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/^ OF CONSTITUTION OFINDIA '. p. Pe+itioners ; Smt. Ramkumari Nagdeve Aothers Versus Respondents : Sta+e of Chhattisgarh & others SB; Hon'bte AAr. Justice Satish K. Agnjhotri. J Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Sunita Jain, Ponet iawyer for tiie respondents/State. Subhash m i.J. yassed on this 15 doy of December, 2006) The following order of the Court 'is possed by Satish K. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as we!t as learned Panet Lawiyer appearing for fne respondents/State jointty submit that the facts of the present case are similar to that of in W. P. No. 3893/2006 (Ctevendra Tiwnri ys. State of Chhattisgarh & others), which was disposed of vide order dated 7.8.2006 (Annexure P/5). TTiey further submit +hat ttie question of !aw invotved is also the same. 2. In view of the above stated submissions made by iearned counse! for the parties this petition is dvspoaed of in terms of Ihe order dated 7.8.2006 Tiwari vs. by this Court in W. P. No. 3893/2006 (Devendra )f Chhatl-isgarh A. others). No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge K^^l'KSS^^^^^^^^^^^