IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 24470 of 2010 Date of decision: 25.11.2010 Seema ........ Petitioner Versus Nanak Chand .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. H S Brar, Advocate for the petitioner None for the respondent -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of complaint No. 56-1 dated 04.10.2006 (Annexure P2) as well as summoning order dated 08.07.2008 (Annexure P3) and order dated 12.03.2010 (Annexure P4) passed by the Courts below. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that since the petitioner has been discharged vide order dated 03.11.2010 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur, the present petition is rendered infructuous. A photo copy of the order dated 03.11.2010 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur, discharging the petitioner from the charge has also been placed on record. Dismissed as such. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge November 25, 2010 mohan