IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10382 of 2010 1. SATYENDRA KUMAR YADVENDU, S/O YUGAL KISHORE YADVENDU, R/O KARMA, P.S. KONCH, DISTRICT- GAYA------------------petitioner Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF TELECOMMUNICATION, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. THE SECRETARY OF TELECOMMUNICATION, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 3. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, B. S. N. L. TELECOME CIRCLE BIHAR,PATNA. 4. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, B. S. N. L. TELECOME CIRCLE , GAYA. 5. DIVISIONAL ENGINEER (A&P) B. S. N. L. TELECOME DIVISION , GAYA G. B. ROAD, GAYA.----------------------------------respondents ----------- For the petitioner :M/S S.Hafeez Ahmad Surendra Kr.Singh,Advocates For the Union of India:Mr.Md.Abu Haider,C.G.C. ---- 2. 09.7.2010 The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the authorities of the B.S.N.L. relating to non- payment of several bills to the tune of Rs.8,20,090/- for the work done by him under the agreement dated 7.12.2004. Learned counsel refers to various letters issued by the authorities of the B.S.N.L. in which there is admission regarding pendency of the said bills but it is also stated that the same require to be rechecked physically. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no decision has been taken by the authorities although those letters had been written on 19.5.2007 and 17.11.2007. Learned counsel for the B.S.N.L. submits that the present writ application is not maintainable as there is no admission of any dues by the 2 authorities of the B.S.N.L. and further there is provision for arbitration in the agreement in this regard. In the above circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to either approach the authorities of the B.S.N.L. for redressal of his grievances or take recourse to arbitration proceedings. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) Spal/