16. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF RC.REV.229I2OLO ASHOK RAHEJA Through: VCTSUS DELHI AT NEW DELHI Mr s.K ahattacha?i5\i1in"' Mr. Niraj Bobby, Adv. rt} PRAKASHWATI GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Malhotra with Ms. Sonali Malhotra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTTCE VEENA BTRBAL ORDER 09.LL.2010 RC.REV. 22912010 & CM 1727sl2010 After some arguments counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is not pressing the petition on merits and prays that petitioner be given some time to vacate the premises in question. The respondent is present in person. Under the instructions from the respondent, the counsel for the respondent states that the respondent has no objection in granting time to the petitioner up to 10.05.2013 and the respondent will not execute the eviction order till then. ln view of above statement given by the counsel for parties the present petition and pending application stand disposed of. The petitioner is granted time till 10.05.2013 to o/o Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified /n vacate the premises in question subject to filing of usual V undertaking by'the petitioner within two weeks with a copy ," I the respondent. In the meanwhile, the respondent shall not execute the eviction order till the next date of hearing. Renotify on 01.12.2010. The parties to appear in person on the next date. u-t- VEENA BIRBALJ NOVEMBER 09, 2O1O srb -U*W5Afr/A