IN THE HI^H COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BItASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 5^1^ o^^OlO PETITIONER 4^T ^\.- ^ ^' V RESPONDENTS Kumari Kaipana Khare, daughter of Late Shri Dr A.K, Khare , aged about 45 years, Occupotion- Ser.vice, presently posted as Principal, &ovt. 6irls Higher Secondary Schooi, Belgehna, Kota, District Bifospur, resident of Vishnu Ncigor, Kududand, Lav Singh Building, Biiaspur (C&) vs / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Adim Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Devefopment Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. 2. The SecretGry, Schoof Education Deportment, Mcintrolaya, D.K.S» Bhowan, Raipur. 3, The Commissioner, Adim Joti Tatha Anusuchit Jati Development Department, Raipur, . 4. The District Education Officer, District Bilaspur (C6) y5, Ashwin Kumar Sahu, son of and age not known to the petitioner, PrincipaJ, through the office of District Education . Officer, Bitaspur (C&) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA f^ I? ^b'?^W^. 1 li '^Si^®t 1 '^f COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT WRIT PETITION (S) N0. S813 OF 2010 Petltioner Kumari Kalpana Khare Versus "\^^ Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRiT PETiTiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF iNDiA (SB : Hon'ble IVir. Satash K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Sandeep Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Pane! Lawyer forthe State/ respondents No.1 to4. (ORAU (Passed on 14th day of January, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permisslon of thls Court to withdraw this petition with iiberty to file a fresh and different petltion, wherein causes of action, as pieaded in the case are different. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. Accordingiy, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated liberty, if so advised. ___ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge