CHARURVEDI,000U:A.G.F LME SHIR .NVORTH, 3.1L, SURGUJAmISTTmmxKAPm{M.P.) —Versus- REsmmiéi 1) STATE OF MADHYA PMDESH: TmOUGH:sEcREMRY DEPARTMENT VALLABH BHAWAN,BH0PAL(M.P. OF FOREST, ) .; : 2) KORBA‘.,DISTT:B&LASPUR DIVI$IONAL FOREST OFFICER (M.P.9. V 5,5 DIVISIONA’L FoRmT DWI (ER NURTH SURGUJA,AMBIKAPm (M.P 4; CONSERVATOR OF FOREs‘ GIRCLE BILASPUE, .DISTTwILASPUR {M.1J.). _L . : E 9f : 2 :; i wKg)’ze4i/05 _;§n$§E;§£2§YA N EagwgagggiiwiiigaQELILELE; 2352£§§;§2&2E.§2@INI§EEAT;2§.2RIBUNAL -_ ‘ 0.A.NO@OF 1997“) ’la t w. APPgggg‘y‘g: P.c.cmRURvEDI,AGEB ABOUT m lééH (N‘ P. (S) mmm‘a; .. ma um;(W) Lam”wizo / ‘mmitiém'w aananémwim mmmma mm#%m aiwanést B: HON’BLE SHRI MA S NI 22.02.2010 When the matter was the pstitioner and the matt call, none appears for the. Shri Arvind Dubey’ P' Earlier a fixed date S no one appears for the peti‘ his behalf, the petition is dii §u m ”Va RA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA J. called out for hearing, none appears for r was passed over. Even on the second titioner nor ajly representation is made. mel Lawyer for the State} respondents. RC. was issued to the petitioner. Since tioner and no representation is made on unissed for want ofprosecution. Sd/r Manindra Mohan' Shrivastava Judge an. w . p ,