BT~~ t^ <^^- glNSLEBENCH IN THB HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^-^ W.P.fSl N0. (1 L ^^ /2010 rS.B.t PETITIONER T,v ^ ^ ^/ ^ ^ .<-9%-c ^./c^%> RESPONDENTS Prashant Kumar Shukla, aged about 30 years, S/o Shri Kailash Prasad Shukla, presently working as Steno to Superintendent of Police, South Bastar, District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh, Permanent address: R/o Ward No. 16 Sagar-Pesa, House No. 65, Chhindwara, District Chhindwara (M.P.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through- The secretaiy, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Home Affairs, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Union of India, Through - The Secretary, Deprtment of Personnel Training Public Grievances and Administrative Reforms, 3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi. 3. , State of Madhya Pradesh, Through - The Secretary Home, Government of M.P. mi7ir-" REIZ ® Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, (M.P.) 4. The Director General of Police, Government of Chhattisgarh, Police Head Quarter Raipur (C.G.) i:_ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. \., j Arun HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.4262 OF 2010 PETITIONER Prashant Kumar Shukla RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri B.P. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ShriA.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyerforthe State. Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate forthe respondent No.2. Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocate for the respondent No.3. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 18th day of January, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing forthe petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 2. No objection from other side. 3. It is ordered, as prayed for. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge