IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH APRIL 2007 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1929 WA.No. 910 of 2007() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.4452/2007 Dated 13/02/2007 .................... APPELLANT: PETITIONER: -------------------------------------- P.A.NIAMATHULLA, S/O.P.M.ABDULKAREEM, KANNATTUPADAVIL HOUSE, U.C.COLLEGE P.O., ALUVA PIN CODE NO.683102, ALUVA TALUK, ALUVA WEST WILLAGE. (PROPRIETOR, NRB TRADERS, U.C.COLLEGE P.O., ALUVA-2). BY ADV. SRI. P.A.NIAMATHULLA (PARTY IN PERSON) RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE TRANSFORMERS AND ELECTRICALS KERALA LTD.(TELK), REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, ANGAMALY SOUTH P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (PLANNING AND STORES), THE TRANSFORMERS AND ELECTRICALS KERALA LTD.(TELK), ANGAMALY SOUTH PO, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, KOCHI. 5. THE ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, KANNANKERI ESTATE, 3RD FLOOR, MARINE DRIVE, SHANMUGHAM ROAD, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.M.PATHROSE MATTHAI (SR.) SRI.SAJI VARGHESE SMT.MARIAM MATHAI SMT.RADHIKA RAJASEKHARAN P. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.MEERA THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, AG.C.J. & M.N. KRISHNAN,J. = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.A. NO. 910 OF 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 12th day of April, 2007. J U D G M E N T Radhakrishnan, Ag.C.J. The writ appeal is preferred against the judgment in W.P.C. 4452/07. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant referred to Ext.P8 Government direction to keep in abeyance the sale and send a detailed report. Counsel further submits that respondents 2 and 3 are violating the direction of the Government. We are of the view that if the Government orders are violated the appellant/petitioner can bring it to the notice of the Government in the event of which the Government will take note of the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The writ appeal is disposed of as above. K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-