IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 506 8 OF 2005 RP. Shukla, S/o- Late Shri Rémpati PETITIONER: Shukla, About— 40 Years, Occupation— Chief Executive Officer (Suspended) Janpad Panchayat Patthalgaon,« R/o- Block Colony Patthalgaon, Distt.Jashpur (C.G.) RESPONDENT (S) / 1 State of Chhattisgarh Through 1t’s Secretary .0? Department of Adlm Jat1 Anusuchlt Q Jatl V1kas D K S Bhawan Ra1pur w“ C G /2. Under Secretary Department of Adim Jati Anusuchit Jati Vikas , D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 3. Collector Distt.Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE £6/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF ,AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS / CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION / ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE. / / ‘l WWWW w? 5068 mmmm u-I “i200 W31W (W) The pefifioner, who h 226/227 of fhe Consi‘i'rufio The impugned order da‘red a order of suspension passed c MP(C6) Civil service's (aassi Learned counsel for aforesaid order fhe peli‘rion The aforesaid rules on 28/E has been filed as Annexure F Learned counsel su 28/09/2005, Ibui fhe‘same l In ’view of The pe‘no‘ inclined lo in‘l’erfere in This However, if is direcfe sfill pending before fhe Ai been disposed of by The. Am as filed This Wri‘r Pe‘rifion under Ar'ricle 1 of India has challenged fhe validi'ry of 20/09/2005 (Annexure P-l), which is an igainsT ‘rhe pe‘ri‘h'oner under Rule 9 of The ficmion, comm arid Appeal) Rules, 1966; fhe pe’rifioner submifs *rha-r against The er has filed an appeal under §ule 23(3) of /2005‘ The copy of “rhe memo of appeal —3. 3mi‘rs fha‘r The appeal was filed on as noT been disposed of so far. ency of deparTmenTal appeal, I am noT ‘A/riT PeTiTion aT This sTage’ ad ThaT if The appeal of The peTiTioner is ipellaTe AuThoriTy and The same has noT )ella‘i’e AuThoriTy; The Appella‘re AuThoriTy I/ f/ SP/FS/ZOOS - 20,000 mmwmst mmwk'wm , $mms‘ 4 21/10/2005 Shri Vinay Pandey, learned counsel for ‘rhe peTiTioner. Shri Pankqj Shrivas‘mm, Panel Lqwyer for fhe S‘m‘re/respondenfs on advam e copy. Heard. granrpuézjfg m Wm; wzoo amt W5 (iafw) mmm anéw WW#%W $Wanéw pppeal as early as possible preferably Ln dafe of filing of The cer‘rified copy- of H peTiTion before The said austhorify‘ peTi‘l'ion sfands finaHy‘ Wi’rh fhe above obss irvafiom‘ 7his disposed of. CC. as per rules. shaH ’rry ’ro dispose of The wifhin a period of 6 weeks fro #his order and copy of This wri Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge A‘ak 4‘. y