;inaie 3g IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. -^^- /2004 ^ssSSWS, piasis..-"--— PETITIONER iC^-G^ ^JW^.. ^••••\^.:.-'^< ^^.^y^ ..•*•' ... .••••'"".,•3^"'.^ ^"p,^<.^4 '^>r t.ttv RESPONDENTS B.S.Paikra s/o BaJ.ga Singh Paikra, aged aboat 40 years, R.E.S. aib Divislon No. 2, (Udaipur), r/o Udaipur, Distr.i.ct surguja. C.G. VE R SU 3 1. The state o£ Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Paachayat & Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, C.G. 2. Avar Sachlv, Panchayat Evam Gramin V.i.kas Vibhag» D.K.S. Bbawan, Raipur, G.G. 3. Executive Engineer, R.E.s. Dlvlslon No. 1, Ambikapur, Distrlct surguja, C.G. ^ 4. Ramanuj sbarma, sub Engineer Iteter Resources Department, Div.i.sion No, l, AmbJLkapur, DJ.str.i.ct Surguja, C.G. ./'?""'^ ->—"*is:- l:f; / ^T^ "'^?^ .. ^^,'1' .l^A^AUQ W.IT^ PE_T.rTIOH_UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ^iNDJA. XI-HC—78 aiR^'^1 wsffsn^i ISJiSS:!E!SBi8-^/ tB^H«tgte«iS i-il;"-:"<'~>y- 'TST •^ii'^i^i^, s9xil'H'ito, rsicii-yy L^). p. »-LU-'-(5^ i-/A^ •31I^?11T=Ri' (' E«r) 'renwofeisn^i 9-12-2004 SIul A.K. Prasad, Adv. I^r llie petitioiicr. Shri Siidhir Agrawal, P.) Application for urgcnt hj qi)*lfepftsT HWvS ^ fS^! iPal^K ^r siRpT sii^i .. for the Stete ;aring is aUowcd. Counsel for the petiticjiner submits that the matter relates tp transfer of the petitioner. It is submitted that by the iinpugned order, he has bccp transferred froni Udaypur to Rama.nujganj, distt. Sarguja. |He further submits that for tlie present the petitioner may bp given an opportunity of filin^ the detaUed representation before the competent authority of the respondents, which shaU jbe considered on its own merits in accordance with law. 1 1 Havlng considered and fFithout expressing any opmion on the merits ofthecase, tn t^ie opimon ofthis Court, ends of jusLice will be served if a du-eqlioii 1s giveii lo tlie pctilioiier to make a detfliled representation raising his grievances hefore thc compctcnt authority of fhy rcspondcnts along with a copy of the petition and £his order, wittun 15 days, and on such representation bemg filed, the competent authority of the respondents shall decide fhfe sam.e on its own ments m accordaiice with law as early 4s possible preferably witliin two months frora the date of receipt of the representation, XI-HC—7i d^ '^[•'IKW, ^irTra'iio, T^^iR-fy . (jJ.?.idB. 4S3^-/fell ^E;). S'R^I^'RflT i T:a? 3T^I Bitm?4 ?«iTW:^ftci SiT^I ;a(i-;ySBg •i*"s?'!is:gsB-'"s'° ^N?pfl~1'WRfi ^ fS^ Tf^T!: ^sffirEtsni?! Leamed counsel.fbr th4 petitioner subiaits that the petilioiier lias uol beeu rclicv^d. He prays Uiat the pelilioiicr may be allowed to continiie. It is du^ctcd fhat if thc |x;titioncr has not bccn rcUcvcd and other person has not joijaed in place of petitioner, the petitioner may be allowed to cc^ntinue till the representation is decided. It is raade clcar thajfc if fhe petitioncr has already been reUeved or other person Ihas ah'eady joined m placed of the petitioner, fhis order witt not entitle the petitioner to rejom at the earller place of pqstlng. With the aforesaid obs^rvations, fhis petition stands disposed of. | ConsequenUy M.W.P.IM^. 4869/2004 also stands disposed of, | CerlUied copy as per rulds.__, Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge "j ^yJ^- !^J''!S:S!:l<!?3?<Siffi'eiSfe