HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR CONTEMPT PETITION No.209/2007 PETITIONER Smt. Gaya Bai Kashyap, W/o late Shri Gore Lal l^shyap, aged about 63 years, R/o Malhar, Police Station Masturi, District Bitaspur (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1 Shri Gaurav Dwivedi, (Former Collector Bilaspur), Managing Director, Marketing Federation, Civil Line, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Shri Subhodh Kumar Singh, Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 Shir N.K.Oswal, Secretary, Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 4 Naval Singh Mandavi, Director, Bhu-Abhilekh, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMFT OF COURT ACT Appearance: Mr. M.L. Pastore, Counsel forthe petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, Counsel for respondents No. 1&2. Mr. Raja Sharma, Counsel for respondents No.3 &4. ORAL ORDER (03.12.2009) SUNILKUMARSINHA.J. Heard. Petitioner Smt. Gaya Bai l^shyap has filed this petition for initiation of proceedings of contempt against the respondents for the alteged defauft in compliance of the order dated 12th of December 2006 passed in W.P.No.171 9/2005. This Court while disposing the said writ petition passed the following order: y1/ CONTEMPT PETITION No.209/2007 "3. Admittedly, the husband of the petitioner was convicted under the provisions of the Act,1988 and the appeal filed by the petitioner against the conviction is pending consideration before the High Court. The respondents may release the provisional pension and other retrial benefits under provisions of law, if permissible, to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order." Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, learned eounsel for respondents No. 1 & 2 makes statement on instructions that after passing of the order on 12 of December 2006, the concerned respondents paid a sum of Rs.2,72,806/- on 21.05.2007 on account of GPF. On 14.02.2007, a sum of Rs.10,919/- was paid on account of Family Benefit Scheme. He further submits that prior to all this, a sum of Rs.1455/-was paid on account of General Insurance and Rs.21,478/- was paid as Interim Gratuity and in this manner, the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.1719/2005 on 12th of December ^)06 has been complied wlth in its letter and spirit. In view of the above categorical statement made by leamed counsel for respondents No.1& 2, l do not deem it appropriate to proceed further in the matter of cqntempt against the respondents. Accordingly, the Contempt Petitlon is dropped at this stage. . —— Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge shyna