IN THE HIGH COURT OP JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR •WRIT PETITION N0.1"782-/2005 PETITIONERS: EE®i;SStB!figs *s*1""—- 'P<tstT'^.-?"'T'~o^\ p&^-^; (T^ 6 ^^f^<^ \^^£^"^ ..^5^^^' •"2: ^•••":^^-"".^-<^'' ^'^•^f^^^ ,f >-~^, .XL^ •%:'^-:....-^,^ ^ ^ 1) Smt. Meena Bhagat Aged about 42 years W/0- A^-Bhagat R/0- Upper Division Teacher Govt. Higher Secondary School Dondi, Distt- Durg (C.G.) Smt. Nirmala Thakur Aged about 37 years W/0- U.S. Thakur R/0- Upper Division Teacher Govt. Middle School, Dondi Distt;- Durg (C.G.) / 3) Smt. Silwanti Puri Aged about 39 years W/0- P. Puri Upper Division Teacher R/0-Kanya Ashram, Dondi Distt:- Durg (C.G.) 4) Smt. Kalyani Ekka Aged about 38 years W/0- A.P. Ekka R/0- Upper Division Teacher Govt. Higher Secondary School Dondi, Distt- Durg (C.G.) 5) Anandi Kumar Ekka Aged about 37 years S/0- Alvius Ekka R/0- Upper Division Teacher Govt. High School Arajpuri Distt:- Durg (C.G.) VERSUS Con-"2 RESPQNDENTS:- Wws'Ssfs'ssasw'f'* ^ 1) State of Chhattisgarh Through : - Secretary, Schedule Tribes, Scheduled Caste and O.B.C. Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / 2) Divisional Deputy Director , SC/ST. & O.B.C. Welfare Raipur (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. most respectfully "5 \;iwi -qi^lciq^ t»Tfl<9<|d,Rriioy^ *tWc51SWS acLinn *ii*irti^*nq» \dwf-«rairt«,t»-(il<(i<i(»,[sirti'dyt . .UA^.t>D...Y^^.l^^.. W^ 200 isi-i»s^s»s*®®W- ^?^'^^lv*^t^^s =f^s^T 31I^?T<prR-ifcR aaiTOT^STSCTN; sile:-w.-a'jsttiac VSSssKSSSSSSSB. 3TI^?T tRiP (l^i^sl^) ?i?ai4R^riS?3ii^?T -200i Shri Y. C. Sharma, cour Shri Akhi! Agrawai, P.L. Heard both t'ne counsel The case of the petitior the year 1993 on the posis profciation ror two years wlth ^ the petitioners were regulariz^ oeriod has not been counted appoi'nied with fhs pstiiionsr^ ihe date of initiai appointmsn^. State of M.P. the State Adminj to the teachsrs from the date a reauest to the respondentsl consideffng the case or the pe( Counsei for the petitx aiiowed fo make a detaiied •^'.ifit.l^V&ifi +.-^ f^i'^.r^t.ri^ ^^ft C'-Q \iiii :s^^ivy\d v»y ^it^?i/JUi3 ii t^ Syrti t i ibjection. <pi<lfn4)i*it*f»l"^r"[s'<l•((u|«l'< ^aif^Tsn^ST fsel for the petifioners. |for the State'rsspondents. lers i.s that ths petjtioners were appointad in k (;f U.D.T.. Snitiatly they were appointed on flxea' salsr/ of Rs.1400/-. After two years, |d and given reguiar pay scaie but probation Foi'.their seniority. Other teachers who v/ere ars aeitina increrrients and senioritv from tn ths cas° of Harish Chandra Singh Vs. strative Tribuna! directed to give increfnents of initial appointment. The petitioners made for increments but the respondents are not itioners. iohera submiBed that the c'etitioRers may be r^presentatjon to respondent No.2 8nd he be to whlch counse! for respondents has no Wi ^-! ^ '3 ^5tT -«i«|i?)<4,yrilii'KS, Isirti't-iy'; *1l«1rtla»tTT^ 3TI^97<RTR-f|ch ?r8n3iii<i*«< . -&9^r-QsTve 3n^Siqgq?(4c|(j<s|^) ^200 Having heard tearned !he facts and cireumstances rsouest msde bv Issmsct cou 4:ounssi for the peiitionsi-s, havirsg ragard to bf the ca.se and also tooking to the i'mited <3^ hsei for ths DSuSioners which appsars to oe ite aiiowed to make a detaiied rspresenfation just and fair, the petitioners ai| to respondent No.2 within s respondent No.2 wili deeide fie representation of the petitoners vvithin period .of three monihs from t <ni<itn<ili*iii<')V^'fs'<l 'iluK-ei'f ^>art^i(3ii^?T period of 15 davs from todav and in turn io u&ii'c considering aii ths points rais^d by tha peiitonars Sn an objatctiv®mannsr in accordance wiih iaw. Wlth the direction aforefei Consequentiy, I.A. No.; Parties are enfitied for der said, the petjtion stands disposed of, 397/2005 aiso stands dlsposed of. ^rtlfled copy of this ord&r. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge 'M a^-f :-/ ^-