1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 10697 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 10697 OF 2010 *** 1. Heard Advocate Shri D. N. Nagode for Petitioner/ plaintiff, Advocate L. P. Pallod for Respondent/ defendant. 2. The trial Court has, by impugned order, refused leave to amend to petitioner/ plaintiff. Learned counsel states that amendment could not be sought earlier as plaintiff has grown old and on many occasions forgets some facts. According to him, nature of suit remain same and no prejudice is caused to other side. 3. The perusal of application for amendment, as filed, shows a reason of old age, of forgetting the facts, of not giving information to counsel while drafting plaint, as it was drafted hurriedly. The trial Court has looked into all those and found the same not sufficient as recording of evidence of petitioner/ plaintiff is already over. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 10697 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. 4. As all relevant facts are looked into, there is no jurisdictional error or perversity. Petition rejected. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:17/01/2011. ans/10697