IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2790 of 2011 RAKESH RANJAN, SON OF RAJMANI RAJESH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 11.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is husband of the deceased and his marriage had taken place in the year 1999. It is apparent from the First Information Report itself, that the petitioner and deceased were blessed with two children out of the aforesaid wedlock but as per the informant, their married life was not peaceful and petitioner used to put pressure upon the deceased to fetch more money from her natal place. It is stated that on 11.10.2010 the deceased consumed a tablet of Sulphos at the instigation of the petitioner. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that deceased was a working lady and there was no occasion for the petitioner to pressurize her for the money. He further submits that according to prosecution case itself, the deceased herself consumed Sulphos tablet. Although, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for bail but considering the above stated facts as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 176 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )