IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20324 of 2011 Parmeshwar Prasad Sah, Son of Late Deo Narayan Sah, Resident Of Ward No.25, Professor Colony, Forbisganj, Police Station Forbisganj, District Araria. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Vice Chancellor, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura, District Madhepura. 4. The Registrar, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura, District Madhepura. 5. The Principal, Forbisganj College, Forbisganj, District Araria. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 21.11.2011. Heard Shri Santosh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/B.N. Mandal University. The petitioner, who retired on 31.7.2005 as Lecturer, Department of Physics from Forbisganj College under B.N. Mandal University, has prayed for directing the respondents to pay remaining arrears of his pension. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that for the relief sought for in the present writ petition, the petitioner has also filed representation before the authority concerned. However, till date, no decision has been taken on his representation nor any grievance has been redressed. 2 It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before respondent no.4. The submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner has not been disputed by the University. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation regarding claim made in the present writ petition before respondent no.4/Registrar, B.N. Mandal University within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.4 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no.4 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to clear the dues within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.4 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within four months from the 3 date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)