IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 29553 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: November 10, 2010. Anil Goswami ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana and another. ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. S.K.Garg Narwana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh, A.A.G., Haryana. Mr. R.S.Rai, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Karan Pathak, Advocate for the complainant. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.170 dated 28.07.2010, under Sections 406/420/506 IPC, registered at Police Station NIT, Faridabad. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. CRM No.M-29553 of 2010 It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been continuing in custody since 30.08.2010 and that investigation has already been completed and challan filed and the case is triable by Magistrate. Further contends that charge in this case has not been framed so far and hence, trial is not likely to be concluded in near future. Learned counsel for the State has not disputed these facts. However, bail application has been opposed by learned counsel for the complainant. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Anil Goswami is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Faridabad. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) November 10, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2