g9 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR wRrr PETITION (227) No. 6656/2011 PETITIONERS 1. Ram Sai son of Thole, aged about (Defendants) 45 years. 2. Ramdham’ son of Thole, aged about 43 years‘ 3. Ludpa, son of Thole, aged about 4O years. A11 residence of village Keradih, ’I‘ahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur, Chhatiisgarh, Caste Uraon. Versus Respondent: 1. Raimohan Bhagat, son of Rafail [Plainu'if Bhagat, aged about 4O years, caste Uraon, Occupation Aglicultum, village Pandripani, Police Station Natayanpur, Tahsil Kunkurl, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Smt. Mulo Bai, wife of Dhonde, aged about 6O years, caste Uraon, l residence of Village Kemdih, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh (respondent): 3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Jashpur, Disuict Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:— Shri C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate for the petitioners. Shrl Akhil Agrawal, P.L. for the State/respondent No. 3 Respondents No. 1 85 2 not noticedt ORDER (Passed on 14] 11/2011) 1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India petitioners have challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 6/4/ 2011 passed by Civil Judge Class—1, Kunkuri, in civil suit No. 34A] 20 10 whereby application flled under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 on behalf of the petitioners] defendants have been dismissed. 2. Alternative exhaustive remedy of revision is available to the petitioners. Consequently, petition is dismissed summarily. No order as to costs. é“ @ Inmn'm application stands disposed of. Ccrtitied copy of the order impugned be mtumed to the learned counsel for the petitioners on his submitting duly attested Photostat copy of the same. ./We SdL T.P. Sharma {1/ Judge “