^f C )- \ ETA IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. H5 /2086-9' PETITIONER /^Af ]tL/.' •'>..••' ^/-"••' ^ ..••'\^y' .M^> ^^;/ -s^ ^'.^ .'i;~\'>' ^^y V e-' RESPONDENTS ^ S3 Phulsay Paikara t/I S/o Late Shri Sukhi Ram Paikara Age about 38 years, AssistantTeacher, Govt. Primary School, Dwaripara, Block - Kartala, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) VERSUS J. State Government of Chhattisgarh Through:- Secretary, Tribal & Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) '^ ^ o^'ft''^ ^^ ^•" ?. AssistantCommissioner TribalWelfare Department, Korba(C.G.) 3. District Education Officer Korba (C.G.) 4; Block Education Officer Kartala, Distt.-Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioner most humbly submit as under :- HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P. fSl No. 111 <rf 2007 Pethioners ; Heniant Sin^i KCBWIIWT and ano-ther Versus Respondents : State Sovemment of Chhattisgarh andolhers w. p. ra No. 112 of 2007 Petitioner : Chunni Singh Markcun Versus ftespondents : State Sovemment of Chhattisgurh ondolhers W P. rSlNo. 114 <rf 2007 Petitioner : Knmal Singh Paikuro Versus Respondents : Stute Sovernment of Chhottisgorh andothers W. P. fS) No. 115 of 2007 Petilioner : Phulsny Paiknra Versus Reqwndents ; Storte Sovemment of Chhatt'isgarh and otfiers And W. P. fS) No. 116 of 2007 Petitioner : Pmmod Singh Paikaro Versus Respondents : Stnte fiovemment of Chh<rttisgarh andothers SB: Hon'bfe Mr. Justice 5atish K. Agnihotri. J Shri Ajfff Shrivastavn, /tdvocate fwr -the petitioners. Smt. Anju Ahujo, Deputy SovemmCTt Advocote for the respondents/State. W) ORDER (Rassed on 16th <fcy of Januaiy, 2007) The following order of the Cwrt is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri. J. 1. Leomed counsel oppearing for -the petitioners as »i«llas leomed Deputy Sovemment Advocerte ofyeoring for the reipondents/Stnte jointty submit that the facts of the present case are similor to that of in W. P. (s) 6108 of 2006 (Rajkumari W/o M.K. Dilliwar Vs. TTie Stnte 6ovt. of Chhuttisgorh & others), which wws disposed of vide order derted 8th November, 2006. TTiey frrther submit that the question of law invohwd is also •fhe same. 2. Ih view of the above stoited submissions niade by teamed counsel for •fhe porties, these writ petitions are disposed of m terms of tbe order dated 8<tl Nommber, 2006 passed by •fhis Court in W. P. (s) 6108 of 2006. No order ws to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record m other conneeted writ petitions. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge