CWP No. 14535-CAT of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.14535-CAT of 2010 Date of decision 17 .8.2010 Union of India and another ... Petitioner Versus Rampyari and another ... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr.GS Bal ,Advocate for the petitioners 1.To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 2.Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? M.M.KUMAR, J. The Union of India has filed the instant petition challenging order dated 6.4.2010 (P.3) passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (for brevity 'the Tribunal') allowing the Original Application filed by respondent no.1 holding her entitled to family pension and allowances under the Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993 (for brevity 'the Rules'). Brief facts of the case are that husband of respondent no.1 while working as Fire Man Grade “C” with the petitioner-railway met with an accident during the course of his employment and ultimately died on 11.1.1969. When no family pension or retrial benefits were paid, respondent no. 1 filed O.A. before the Tribunal seeking family pension and other admissible retrial benefits. Vide impugned order, the Original Application was allowed by the Tribunal. Rule 75 of the Rules provides that when a railway servant dies before or after completion of one year of continuous CWP No. 14535-CAT of 2010 2 service then the family of the deceased is entitled to family pension.The Tribunal, therefore rightly directed the applicant- respondent for grant of family pension under Rule 75 of the Rules or any other provision . We find no illegality in the impugned order which may warrant admission of the petition. Dismissed. (M.M.Kumar) Judge (Ritu Bahri) 17 .8.2010 Judge okg