1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3559 OF 2011 Shashikant Girdhardas Bagdi & Others Vs. Additional Collector & another. .......................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders .......................................................................................................................................... Mr. S.V. Purohit, Adv. for the petitioner. CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 29th JULY, 2011. The above petition takes exception to the order dated 31.3.2011 passed by the Additional Collector, Nagpur, by which order the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal against the order passed by the Rent Controller dated 10.1.1997 came to be rejected. The facts in the above proceedings disclose that an order came to be passed by the Rent Controller on 10.1.1997 granting permission to the respondent no.2 landlord to issue quit notice. It is the case of the petitioners that they acquired knowledge of the same in the year 2001 when the quit notice was served upon them pursuant to the said order dated 19.1.1997. It is required to be noted that the appeal against the said order dated 10.1.1997 was filed on 20.11.2009. The aforesaid conspectus of facts have been taken into consideration by the appellate authority and has thereby rejected the application filed for condonation of .....2/- 2 delay. In my view, the said conspectus of facts disclose the indolence and negligence with which the petitioners have prosecuted the proceedings. Writ court obviously cannot come to the aid of such litigants. In that view of the matter, no case for interference is made out. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE Hirekhan ...../-