IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5026 of 2011 BHOLA YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 27.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 08 of 2007 registered under Sections 8 (C) and 20(B) of N.D.P.S. Act. The recovery is of commercial quantity of Ganja. It is submitted by senior counsel for the petitioner that neither F.I.R. nor the case diary reflect that the alleged Ganja was weighed as there is no reference of any weighing equipment being used. Hence, it is submitted that given weight is only speculative one. It is also submitted that recovery was made from the joint family house when only the petitioner is being chased by the police. Moreover, the female members were admittedly present in the house but even then their signature was not obtained on seizure list. It is submitted that charges have already been framed. 2 Let the trial court expedite the trial and try to conclude the trial within a period of nine months keeping in view the aforesaid contentions of the learned senior counsel for the petitioner. Let the trial court conclude the trial on day to day basis. If the trial will not be concluded within a period of nine months from today the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after nine moths. With this observation, this application is disposed off. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)