FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1122 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION ST. NO. 92 OF 2010 _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Shri R.M.Deshmukh, advocate states that he has got the instructions to appear for respondent no.1 and he shall file the Vakalatnama till 31 st March, 2010. The said statement is accepted and taken on record. Heard Shri K.C.Sant, advocate holding for Shri P.R.Adkine, advocate for the applicant; Shri R.M.Deshmukh, advocate for respondent no.1 and Shri P.P.More, APP for respondent no.2. This is an application preferred by the applicant (original accused) for condonation of delay of 283 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Revision Application. For the reasons mentioned in the application, it is apparent that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily and said delay does not appear to be willful, deliberate and intentional. Hence, present Criminal Application No. 1122 of 2010 is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and 283 days delay caused in filing Criminal Revision Application stands condoned and accompanying Criminal Revision Application St. No. 92 of 2010 be registered. -2- Present Criminal Application No. 1122 of 2010 stand s disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) 24.3.2010 dbm/crap1122.10