IN THE WKDBXA PRADESH ADHINISTBATIVE IRIBUNAL BEHCH ESIPUR' G.A. N0. APPLIC&NT VERSXJS RESPOHDENTS y OF *( (1998))* UTP'S-^S"^il^r Sa-fcisfa Chandra Hardiha s/o Sfari Deo Narayan Hardiba aged.-abp'at years Ex-Aahoc Teacher Village and Pos-t Sarwani Tahsil Kbariaya Distt. Raigarb 1. State of Hadbya Pradesh •througli Secretary Scbool Educal-ion Bep-fct. Govt. of M.P, Ban-fcralaya Vallabh BSavan Bhopal. .2. CoiBmissioner/DirectQr pf Pub.lic Ins-fcructioia H.P. HearehetaK Bridge Bbopal. 3. Jelnt Birector of Public lastFuc-' tj.en Bllaspur Divislon Bilaspar. 4. Depaty Birecter of PBbIIe• ^ - '. iRS-tEQc-ta-on Distrie-fc Eauea-tj-®® i; Offieer SiuJLu-S^j^ w^-P l: ^'^ ••.^| t;:ff '••^^ '-^-^^ •aa EBa 8B8 FT';T^" F-"zn^ii ^i-HC-22 ~T=T^PTRTq.s^WTSi.'&MKIil.t ^%i^l 'S"ii^£l "BSSI W^ EET •i?^ SI^; arcit^'CTfig 6').'\::::'^;2_<3-& WElTtTgPI-lRR -s- 27-4-2006 Mr. K.N. Nande, counsel for t^ie petitioner. %!-. S.K. Beriwal, Deputy Adyefcate 6enKra! for the State/respbndents. Iriitjally/tHepetitionerhddoj^roachedtheStateAdministrativeTribunal, Benchst Raipur, which cam®to fae| been •i-i'onsfer'retl tothis Court andrt|egister'e<tjas-W.P.No.2532/2005. This petition was fiiedin the ^eap-l998inwhichthepetitioneFmentipned that +he petitioher his B.Cj»n exatnination in the year 19^7- Mes waa appointed as Upper Oivision Teacher| 7-9-1982 and he joined on 13-9-| 30-4-1983. The servi&es of the peti |ort ad-hpc basis of Rs.3g0/- pep month from |982. : f-lis dppointnient cohtuiued, up tp itjonerwferetarminatedwjtheffectfRornt- after due sefectiQn. .Some simiiarSy] the l-figh Court of Madhya Pradesl^ inter'viewed bythe StatutorySelect Stote of Madhya Pradesh <& others Court' and again in Ram Sahay Jha ' .M-—- ^f^id<ili *-iiy<nT'^ fs^ <iflit$i< ^Tsriigifan^ ; sboiished end therefore, thjs p'etition has^ 5-1983; The petitioner ui<X3dppoin*e^ agairist.the p03ti)fUt»per£>iki3ionTeachei' circumsfanced ad-hoc teach^ifts approached in fhe case ef Bheru Singh vs- ,$t<ri^ of tedhya Prcdesh & others deeidfed o|i 25-3-1986, mwht^htheCQUrt- passed the < : ' '' . . 1- : ^'•ii-. '••-.•••^'-' '•. .'^' 1; :'.'• ;;;1> ':".1."' onter that all such teachers who^ad heen given iqipojntment earter; wil!,be on Committeeandthesepvieesofonly^'Hose who iiuoulel not be found fit to be apjjointed 03 teachep3;wi!l be ter'minated, while »J:' . • • ' . "--^ therestwil! becomereguiarappfflrrt^3.Inthemortterofl<u.^ diiTftlar'QrderviKu^possedbythe^.P.i-ligh ^a. Stote of Madhva Ppfldesh^&others.ithet Adminjatrative Tribuncil, ©wmljor8e^h, wde order clateelt6^4996 ^^ed^im order To scrutinize •i'he cases irjdiyjduatly ahd if tliey are found etigiKiei m 11 ^[Tit^^f^T' XI-HC-22 ^sg^IAilci^, dtfly)id,. ri ig?: t||1?IfS!i1|ch .,;_..&3.SiQ-s^i. 200-5" an^r'w 1<!;n??3T]^T ^kl ^ff?T l""v- ld. it haus been WSnTloned that ttie ease of fsr'i^pointment.thentheyEieappoinT^t the petitiorien Js similar, thsrefore, <|irect the rejspondents tfcre-appoint ths petil'ionerasUppet'DjviaonTeachero^ him +o fcce th®Statutory Selection C^ Retym hasbeen filed oribehuifl ith 82 aGdhewopkedonlyupto30TnApri ^i^rf^fl^ *i!t?<:iT "rf 'f^t^ •(.f^.^K • '^SipgilSlI^T ' < td regularizetheappointmentaft'erasking nnmittee. • . .': • :»•- '., '.... of •ilis Stffii-e/respondents in whieh it has been men'i'ioned thfft 1-he petitionei* w^s appointed on!y for Oicademic year 1981- :. 1982; thereafi'er, he neither workei:! nor was appointed. The peti+ioner waa ap^ointed ini+ially for 89 dtays and •htiei'eaf+ei' with br*ecd< he worked up to 30* April,|l982. This petition has been fjled afi-era 9<ip of 17 years, therefore. the petiti4n is liable to be dismissed. I have heard learned counsei foir the parties. In Annexure A-4 filed bythe has been^miBntioHed thot the petitione|" was appoirrfed vide orderdated 7-9-1982 on ad-hoc basls at the rate of Rs.350^- per nionth. h& took charge on 13-9-1932 cmd worked UD to 3-4-1983. Therefl months on ael-hoc basi3;thereafteF, r oniv in the year. 1998 i.e. after 1S y ^re, the petitioner wortei for about 7 ^ ^moinect ^sUent <ind dpprocchedjthe Tl*ibUnal ^ars. There \a nothing\on record .that^ hiff the petitioner haS by nowercissed th pe+ition is iiable to te diismiiised on t^ 1. The petitioner's appointfflent| accr'ued irr favour of the petiti " appointmentviids madeogainst etitiorier' which wds issued on 6-3»1998,it appointrnent was again»tthe substanp-ive sonetiohed vacant poisf and moreoyer |e age pf 50 yedrs,.as such the petitioner's e fol|owin9 cotinta;- ' was pureiy ad-hoc, therefore, no nght mer antfthere is nothing on pecorcl that hjis rhe permanent seinctioned post. f^ ^fo^-^ BK RSi KSS l^ftf^y^V---.-^-^ 3^'^(ril?R, tfifllwis, INSfRq? ^•.^.•2:5^^ ni1CT(.9iHt<»> ; 200^^ "i^ar P-ftFWsniST w^^' -^f^ w,yy'-^n.y:w;:s^n'i:Mt •'' ?.'"^;"3n^f''?iR[S<atri5?! ^?.'^1^ ^''^'s^'"-"" '^^^ey^- ^ 2:'^S! R^ecision of th^: judinitent in the miatter of ^ecretapy, Sfate of. KflmatattaTand otheps V3. Uinadeyj and others repi hoc "employees 'are not enti regularized^ 3. Mor'eover^ this petitiori wasf\ th? pe1itioner> therefore^ <j deservea to be djstriissed. In the cir'cumstances, the pe'| be rro order as to cos+s. Consequently, I.A.Nos.S90/2p06 & 891/2006 sTand dispesed of. ./t \-w '1 Nt'fi^ ti 'blltcl''il-t tlTCRff-? fsi^^fiRgR iTSlPtWSft^I . "\. pex.Couri'inthepeeent Constitutiori gench ri-ed inZ006 {4} SCALE 197, tempordry sKi- itied for cohtinuatjon arid thev csnnot b<e iled onfv aft-^r 15 Ysars of the termjnal'jon of fl -the ground bf ictches dlso this petition \. itton hsving no merit is djsmissed. There wiil Sd/- L^.Bbadoo ~ ludge • ;^f^-,'