IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH JULY 2007 / 27TH ASHADHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 905 of 2007(S) ------------------------------ JUDGEMENT IN WPC.14917/2005 Dated 04/01/2006 .................... PETITIONER: ----------------- 1. SMT.HELEN JEROME, 39 YEARS, W/O.JEROME ANTONY, TECHNICAL OFFICER, DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, KOLLAM. 2. E.SALAHUDEEN, TECHNICAL OFFICER, DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. G.RAJMOHAN, TECHNICAL OFFICER, DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.P.NARAYANAN RESPONDENT: ------------- T.BALAKRISHNAN, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.SHYSON P.MANGUZHA. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. .......................................................... CONT. CASE (C)No.905 OF 2007 ........................................................... DATED THIS THE 18th JULY, 2007 J U D G M E N T Mr.P.Narayanan, counsel for the petitioners submits that he has been informed by the petitioners that in purported compliance of the directions in my judgment, orders have been passed. The respondent is directed to communicate the order to the petitioners forthwith. If the petitioners are aggrieved by the order, it is open to them to initiate separate proceedings for challenging the order. The Contempt of Court Case will stand closed. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) tgl WP(C)N0. -2-