.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2524 OF 2000 Shri Amar Girdharilal Bajaj ...Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr.Rajiv J. Deokar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms.M.Kajale, A.G.P., for the State. .... CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 17, 2006. NOVEMBER 17, 2006. NOVEMBER 17, 2006. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.P. for the State. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.P. for the State categorically state that the issue involved in the above Petition was squarely covered by the Supreme Court judgment against the petitioner in the case of Government of Government of Government of Maharashtra & Ors. Vs. M/s. Deokar’s Maharashtra & Ors. Vs. M/s. Deokar’s Maharashtra & Ors. Vs. M/s. Deokar’s Distillery, AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT 1216 Distillery, AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT 1216 Distillery, AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT 1216. In view thereof, Rule stands discharged. [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]