ef i^-Q^ ^ S.B. (Service Matterl IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) N0. r2>Z^1 /2010. PETITIONER: <3b^^' ^""^:i y' ^•••",..^y" .b-"" Sint.Fuljencia Minj, wife ofHenry Minj, aged about 45 years, working as Head Misti^ess at Govt. Girls Middle School, Kunjara, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. '%:. .^" versus Respondents ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Departinent, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ^ 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ^-3. Asst.Cominissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. ^4. Block Education Officer, Kunkuri, Disti-ict Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^v ^fi^^ir ~S^ ^WW^, ^Tl1<ri^<o, [^Qll^^< ^1^1^S>[/^... ^ 200 ^^ r!^! (^(^^) ^^ ^T ^Jch WT 3TI^T sb^Jch ^^TW^rft^ ^T^T Qbl^id^l^ iTO^f ^ fe^ ^N^R ^ ^t^H 3^?^[ SB: Hon'bte Shri Manindra Mohan Shrhfastava. J. 09-07^010 Shri C. Jayant K. Rao with Shi petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Law^ advance copy. Heard. |i Harish Khuntiya, counsel for the ^er for the Stat^respondente on Learned counsel appearing fcjr the petitioner submits that ttie petitioner is entitted to benefit of two ^idvance increments on account of she having passed B. Ed. examinationjbefore her appointonent at her own cost It is submitted that the issue invjolved in the present petition is no longer res integra and the same has t^een finally decided by the Hon*ble Supreme Court in the case of Asha ^axena vs. State of M.P. & Ors., 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59. It is further | taken a similar view in his ord^ W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned COLJ attention of this Court to order dated submitted that this Court has also dated 06-02-2W9 passed in nsel for the petittoner further draws >9-04-2010 peesed in Writ Appeat No.124 of 2009, wherein relying upon ^he judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) arjd the order passed by th®Court in another Writ Appeal No.87^2009, consideration of the case for grant circular dat®J21-09-1974 issued by verification ofthefacts pteaded in the Learned counsel for the resr iirections have been issued for two advance increments as per State of Madhya Pradesh. after ition. petitioner would also be considered on tents submite that case of the the same lines. \<f5R^Pt<T —FS/147—2/2010 —1,00,000. ^s^^,^^^.. ^^^^ '%,. t 1 'c; ^ o^ '^.:s^ W*<^ST^»ST^ ^oEf ^ijqjcnq^ ^tli^^Ko, [o|<ni^^< ^...^.1,LC.}..^.,^1>/1.^-^200 ^T^T TRW ('^f^^T) 3T^? ^T f^^i4) TT^TI 3TT^?T $b+ii<^ ..^ Tumane >^nw T?f^?r 3:n^r _z- In view of the statement n\ disposed of witti a direction to the decide the claim of the petitioner for| per circulardated 21-09-1974 issuep after verification of the facts pleaded | weeks from today. <=hl4(F<n<fll 'RTWJf ^* f^zt Tf^$K '^3tf?R3Ty^T iade above, ttiis petition is finally re^pondent authorities to consider and jgrant of two advance increnr^nts as by the State of Madhya Pradesh, |n the petition within a period of eight Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^