IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 211 of 2011 Estkar Ahmad ……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & another ………. Respondents Mr. S.R.S. Gill, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Nandar Arya, A.G.A. for the State/respondents Date of Judgment : 24.03.2011 JUDGMENT Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. The First Information Report says that a stolen vehicle was recovered from a place belonging to ‘X’. It further says that when the recovery was made, ‘Y’ fled. It is now being contended that ‘X’ named the petitioner as the ‘Y’. The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the First Information Report. No ground, far less any reasonable ground, has been made out for that purpose. 2. The writ petition is disposed of with the observation that the petitioner should cooperate with the investigation and, if he does so, appropriate regard therefor shall be given. (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 24.03.2011 Aswal