RSA 583 of 2007. 17.9.2008 Present: Mr. Lalit Sharma, counsel for the appellants. Mr. Subhash Sharma, counsel for the respondents. This is the defendants appeal against the concurrent findings of the two Courts below decreeing the suit of the plaintiffs for possession of the suit land to the extent of 0-0-03 bighas of land as described in the plaint. The learned trial Court, in addition to the other evidence on record, also concluded that the defendant admitted that the demarcation carried out by the local commissioner was correct. In appeal, the entire matter was considered afresh by the learned appellate Court and no infirmity was found either in the appreciation of evidence or the conclusions arrived by the learned Court below. Learned counsel for the appellants has emphasized that the learned Courts below should not have based the judgment on the demarcation report and that the demarcation report was not proved in accordance with law. As noticed by the learned Courts below, the report was not the sole basis for passing the decree in favour of the plaintiffs. What needs to be emphasized is that it was one of the supportive /corroborative materials. On -2- facts, I do not find that the Courts below have committed any illegality in arriving at the conclusions. No question of law, much less substantial question of law, arises for determination in this appeal, which is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending application(s) shall stand dismissed. September 17, 2008 (PC). (Dev Darshan Sud), J.