IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL REVISION No. 402 of 2006 SHANKAR LAL V/S J.V.V.N.LTD.& ORS. Mr. GJ GUPTA, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. VK BHADU, Mr.DS SODHA for Mr.KULDEEP MATHUR, for the respondent Date of Order : 16.7.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the impugned order. The application was filed under Order 7 Rule 11. In my view, the suit cannot be said to be barred, so as to attract the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the provisions of Section 207 of the Tenancy Act. Suffice it to say that those provisions only confer exclusive jurisdiction on the revenue Courts, but then that doesn't bar maintainability of the suit at all. In that view of the matter, though for different reasons, I do not find any sufficient ground to interfere with the impugned order. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/