1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION No. 4326/2010. Vidarbha Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, Nagpur -VERSUS- Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : 06.06.2011. Heard finally by consent of Shri A.A. Naik, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri B.G. Kulkarni, the learned Counsel for respondent. The petitioner had applied for starting M.B.A. Course for the education session 2010-11 and by the present petition, the petitioner is seeking refund of deposit then paid to the respondent University along with the proposal. Shri Naik, the learned Counsel for petitioner contends that, since October 2009 the deposit is lying with the respondent University. 2 Shri Kulkarni, the learned Counsel for respondent states that the process is governed by Ordinance No.3/1994 and as the University has recommended the proposal to the State Government, the petitioner is entitled only to refund of 1/3rd amount. He states that accordingly the file has been processed and in due course the petitioner will get back the necessary amount. He further contends that as there are large number of cases, the refund may take 4/5 months. In view of the rival contentions, it is apparent that the entitlement of petitioner to refund of 1/3rd amount is accepted by the respondent University and they have initiated the action for the same. The respondent University shall arrange to refund the amount at the earliest. With this direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Rgd