IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 15242 of 2010 Date of decision : 20.01.2011 Partap Singh ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Randhir Singh Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Narender Singh, D.A.G., Haryana for respondent Nos. 1 and 3 to 5. Mr. Gautam Kalie, Advocate for Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 6. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel intends to withdraw the instant petition to enable the petitioner to raise all the points involved in this petition in a election petition along with an application for condonation of delay. 2. In this view of the matter, the instant petition is directed to be dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 3. Needless to say that the Tribunal would consider the application for condonation of delay sympathetically. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) January 20, 2010 Judge naresh.k