HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CM No.9123 of 2011 in/and CWP No.4149 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.07.2011 **** Dr. Sukhwinder Singh . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. GPS Bal, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG Punjab for respondents No.1 to 3 &6 Mr. KS Dadwal, Advocate for respondent No.4 Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, DAG Haryana for respondent No.5 ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 09.02.2011 (Annexure P7) declining the benefit of service rendered by him in Health Department, Haryana. He also seeks quashing of the conditions No.4&5 of his appointment letter dated 20.08.2010 (Annexure P2) vide which while putting him on probation, the petitioner has been directed to do rural service for three years. Further, a direction for issuance of ‘no objection certificate’ for CWP No.4149 of 2011.doc - 2 – getting admission in PG Degree Course at respondent No.4-University, has also been sought. (2). Notice of motion was issued and pursuant thereto learned counsel for the parties have been heard. An additional affidavit dated 20/21.07.2011 filed on behalf of respondent No.5, is taken on record. (3). Mr. BS Chahal, learned DAG Punjab has placed on record the ‘no objection certificate’ dated 20.7.2011 issued in favour of the petitioner. (4). Mr. Dadwal, learned counsel representing Baba Farid University states that the University shall have no objection against the petitioner’s doing PG Degree Course against the seat already reserved for him. (5). In view of the above-stated stand taken by the parties, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous, however, with a direction to the respondent- University to formalize the admission of the petitioner and do the needful within a period of three days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (6). The petitioner’s claim regarding payment of salary shall also be decided by the competent authority at the earliest. (7). The miscellaneous application as well as the writ petition are disposed of accordingly. Dasti. CWP No.4149 of 2011.doc - 3 – 21.07.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge