IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 24TH MAY 2007 / 3RD JYAISHTA 1929 WP(C).No. 14905 of 2007(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ K.N.SOMASHEKARAN, SOORYASOMA, DOOR.NO.IX/2250 & IX 2251, MUNNAR, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.TOM K.THOMAS RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- MUNNAR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY(SPECIAL GRADE), MUNNAR. BY SC SMT. AYSHA YOUSEFF. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/05/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No.14905 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 24th day of May, 2007 JUDGMENT Ext.P1 is challenged by the petitioner. Ext.P1 purports to be a notice under Section 406(2) of the Kerala Municipalities Act. 2. I heard counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Panchayat. 3. In view of the fact that Ext.P1 is only a provisional order, I feel that it may not be proper for me to entertain the writ petition at this stage. Petitioner has already preferred Ext.P15 reply. According to the petitioner he has produced documents to support his contentions along with Ext.P15. There is no reason to believe that the local authority will not abide by the mandate of the law in the matter of considering Ext.P15 and the contentions of the petitioner. The petitioner will also be heard before final order is passed. In such circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb WPC. 6107 & 10106/07. 2