1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2148 OF 2009 Sumit Babasaheb Dongare Versus State of Maharashtra and another. Mr. Sachin Panale, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. B. R. Khekale, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. 1. Heard. 2. In an incident dated 8th February, 2009, the Accused/ applicant allegedly entered the clinic of Dr. Anil Sanap, he had altercations with the said doctor and consequently the Accused/ applicant whipped out a Kukari which was concealed at his waist side and threatened the said doctor with dire consequences and also asked him as to why he was not providing treatment to the patient at priority, though the concerned doctor informed he was indeed attending a patient in I.C.U. unit of the hospital. Considering the nature of accusations, though there is a protection in favour of other accused, by this Court, I do not see, at this stage, to entertain the pre-arrest application as apparently the incident is not due to sudden provocation but the accused/ applicant has threatened 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. and created panic in the mind of the complainant, the medical practitioner. Consequently, the application lacs merit. Rejected. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:28/07/2009. ans/2148