IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 572 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 572 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 572 OF 2008 The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay. ... Appellant. V/s. MR.Anant Rajaram Palav. ... Respondent. Ms.Geeta Joglekar i/b. R.A.Malandkar for the appellant. Suresh Gole for the respondent. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 16th July 2008. DATED: 16th July 2008. DATED: 16th July 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard leaned counsel for the rival parties. 2. No case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. On being asked, learned counsel for the appellant states that the alleged order of revocation, which alleged to have been passed by the Corporation, is not available since the same is missing. In this view of the matter, I do not find any merit in this appeal and is liable to be dismissed. However, the trial Court to treat the suit as expedited one. 3. With the above observation, appeal from order is dismissed with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)