IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2675 of 2008 ASHA KUMARI & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 17.04.2009 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the State. In CWJC No. 1334 of 2007 this Court set aside the order of termination of the appointment and directed consideration of the case of the petitioners based on their qualification obtained from Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Allahabad. Learned Counsel for the petitioners relies upon a decision of this Court dated 7.4.2009 in CWJC No. 10748 of 2008 holding that the policy decision of the State Government dated 20.11.2008 refusing to recognise the qualifications from Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Allahabad was prospective in nature. He submits that the appointment of the petitioners could not have been terminated on that ground prior to the date of policy decision. Counsel for the opposite parties rightly points out that the order on the writ petition has been complied with when appropriate orders disposing the case of the petitioners after reconsideration has been passed on 27.9.2008 much prior to the order dated 7.4.2009 sought tobe relied upon by the petitioners. In view of the limited jurisdiction of this Court in contempt proceeding, this Court does not consider it prudent to go into this issue in the present jurisdiction. The contempt application is disposed with the observation that in so far as the issue of contempt is concerned, the order of the Court having been complied with nothing survives for adjudication in the contempt jurisdiction. Nothing in this order shall be construed as a affirmation on the merits of the order dated 27.9.2008 in view of the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners which can only be tested in a freshly constituted writ application. This application is disposed off. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)