IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL REVISION NO.132 OF 2008 Washim S/o Nashim R/o Sherkothi, Civil Line Roorkee, Distt. Hardwar … Revisionist Versus State of Uttarakhand & another … Respondents Sri Pawan Kumar, learned counsel for the revisionist Sri Harish Pujari, learned Addl. G.A. for State/Respondent No.1 Dated: July 10, 2008 HON. DHARAM VEER, J. This criminal revision, preferred by the revisionist under Section 397/401 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as Cr.P.C.) r/w Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.6.2008 passed by Additional Family Judge, Roorkee, Distt. Hardwar in Case No.02 of 2008, Smt. Sajda Vs. Wasim Ahmad. 2. Sri Pawan Kumar, learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present revision with the liberty to avail the appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum. 3. In view of the aforesaid statement given by learned counsel for the revisionist, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the liberty is given to the revisionist to avail the appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum. The certified copy of the impugned order be also returned to learned counsel for the revisionist as per rules. (Dharam Veer, J.) 10.7.2008 Rajeev Dang