IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46662 of 2009 1. SHAMBHU KUMAR SINGH 2. Aneeta Devi @ Sarita Devi Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 02.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that all the false allegations are leveled against petitioners only to justify non- execution of sale-deed which could be possible only after the order of the Court. Really, according to the learned counsel, agreement to sell for the land was executed but sale-deed executed only after filing of the suit and resistance of his brothers with conspiracy of this petitioners could also be removed by the order of the Court for giving vacant possession after opening of the lock of the rooms but in any case, according to the learned counsel, if the relation was so much so strained, it was not possible to entrust the petitioners any money for preparation of passport. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 90 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Madhubani subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)