WP(C) 3705/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE I.A. ANSARI Heard Mr. M. K. Choudhury, learned Senior counsel, appearing on behalf of the pe titioner, and Mr. G. N. Sahewalla, learned Senior counsel, appearing on behalf o f the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Heard also Mr. N. Anix Singh, learned counsel , appearing on behalf of the caveator. The caveat stands discharged. Appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3, Mr. G. N. Sahewal la, learned Senior counsel has produced the relevant records in order to show th at the envelops, containing the tender papers submitted by the respondent Nos. 4 , 5 and 6 herein, were properly sealed. Thus, it has, now, become a disputed qu estion of fact as to whether the envelops, in question, were or were not properl y sealed, as required under the terms and conditions of the relevant Notice Invi ting Tender and the bidding documents connected therewith. Since the outcome of the present writ petition, now, largely depends on the findings of the said dis puted question of fact, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the peti tioner, now, wishes to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach civi l court of competent jurisdiction for remedy of his grievance. Considering, therefore, the matter in its entirety and in the interest o f justice, this writ petition is disposed of as having been withdrawn by the pet itioner with liberty granted to the petitioners to take recourse to such provisi ons of law, as may be permissible, for remedy of his grievances.