L (WV @.. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR C.G. Misc. APPEAL (C ) N09?’ OF 2006 3mgm Eamh Sonu Mahajan D/o. Shri Jaeet Singh aged about 23 years, by caste — Punjabi APPELLANT f/Claimant @ r/ o. Hatkeshwar Ward Dhamtari Tahsil and Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS . 1 RESPONDENTS Rajkumar S/o Krishna Ram Patel r/ 0. Ashok Nagar Gudiyari, Raipur Tahsil ‘ &Distt.— Raipur(C.G.). Gopi Chand Chhelani S/o. Vishanu Ram Chhelani, r/o. Janta Colony Gudiyari, Raipur , Tahsil 85 Distt.— Raipur (C.G.). The New-India Insurance Company, Ltd. Thakkai' Bhawan G .E. Raod Bhilaj, Distt.— Durg (CG). MEMO RANDUM OF MISC APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT w” ,yla XI—HC—78 HW,WW,W M‘rAxc . WW ~~~~.~.~ .”5¢HOK WWW WWW mmm 15.11.2006 Shri Sunil Sahu, counscl fc r the appellant. Leanied counsel for the appellant presses this appeal only on the learned M.A.C.T. for ;76 gound that the amount of Rs. 6,( the damages sustained to the jeep‘ However, leamed counsel evidence of the mechanic‘who ha‘ leamed M.A.C.T. nor did the'clah getting the vehicle repaired. He a] ' Was also not iilcd before the learn above situation awarded a sum of under Section 147 (2) (B) ofthe N In view of the abovevfact : learned M.A.C.T. cannot be faulte The appeal being devoic’ admission. )00/- awarded by the Nas inadequate. for the appellant admitted that neither the irepaired the jeep was adduced before the nant hle any bills forexpenses incurred in so admitted that the policy of the Insurance ed M.A.c.T. The leaned M.A.c.T. in the Rs. 6,000/- which was the maximum limit [otor Vehicles Act. tituation, the compensation awarded by the a with. of merit, is dismissed at the stage of .WJ/l/ eb Deshmllkh Judge “w Li Sd—/ Dilip Raosah Z'e 7/! P.T.O. a1 200g mm<W> mmdww atmm