g^q- ^ii-iiicKi, ®Tf)tf'i(o,Isi^wy NI*<<»11 **<l<h' WI. 200 sn^?T ^RW (^qfg'si^i) aii^r.^ir R-fi'ti W 3IRW sh1 WW^lfelSII^T W.P(q. Ko. 27lOF^OW fBbuSe BeBcIi; Hon'ble Illr. JusUce lAlrien<hti MUhral pBnnoinBR Vs RESPOmDBIIT 14.01.2008 Inderj4«t Singh, S/o Late Shri Rajendra. SinghJ ecysd about 47 yeais, R/o C- 66,Sa^ita Cotony Raipur, Tahsil aad Distri4t Raiour^C.G.l State |Bank of IiuUa, Mam Branch, Jaista4ibh Chowk, Raipur (CG) Shri Bhaskar Payashi Heard. The pctitioner has action of respondent-Stat^ Bank in cxercise of thc p^ 13 (4) read with Rule Reconstructioa of Financif Security Interest Act, 200^ taken possession of the| petitioner as security for failure to pay thc installm^nts couitisel However learned withdraw this petition witl^ proceedings availablc und( Debt Recovcry Tribunal. { * q)l<tl^l<ft^ *ll*1<rfl "f T^^ <T^i^l-< ip 3fRpT<w^<i coynsel for the pestitioner. ftled this petition against the Bank of India whcreby the wers confcrrcd under Section of the Securitisation and il Assets and Enforccmcnt of (for brevity 'Act of 2002') has property mortgagcd by the .he loan taken by him on his and iatcrests thereon. for thc petitioner seeks to the liberty to file appropriate r the Act of 2002 bcfore thc ^Nti'ffi'l) ^t^T —FS/59— 8/2007 —30,000. C—78 311^'t ?iT ft;-fl'* W 30^1 sbtli* N 3^cT^TPTT?5T, ®Tfl^'IC,Rlrtl'My KIN^I *MI* "^ 200 sn^r'wi^ (Tpf^^iT) 'reiiWHfsg OT^T Aecordingly, the with libcrty to the remedy available under p|etition i8 dismisscd as withdrawn pe|titioncr to avail the appropriate Ithe Act of 2002. ^i^i^i-^ii +ii+i<;iT Tf.f^<<^ <^i-t$K ^affiPTsn^l Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge