IN THEHON7BLE HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION f227) N0.7^7' /2010 ^ PETITIONERS , 1] Kewat tw^.m^ ^° ^9 ,\».' y.^ ^ ^yv ,/ ^y ^ ^' J^^' '^w""<e; V/ \"^.\ > (IM^a^-l j ^ j Kz-^} Machhuwa Swa Sahayata Samuh, Gram Panchayat : Ulkhar, Tahsil : Sarangarh, District : Raigarh (C.G.). Through Its president Smt. Noni Bai W/o. Petlu Nishad, aged about : 40 years, 2] Sharda Swa Sahayata Samuh, Gram Panchayat : Ulkhar, Tahsil : Sarangarh, District : Raigarh (C.G.) Through : Its president Smt. Lalita Devi W/o. Ramdas Khurana, aged about : 28 years, Both are R/o. Village : Ulkhar, Tahsil : Sarangarh, District : Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, 7\ Fisheries, Department Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, District (C.G.). Raipur 2] The Additional Collector, Raigarh, District : Raigarh (C.G.). 3] The Sub Divisional Officer / Prescribed (Panchayat), Authority Sarangarh, District : Raigarh (C.G.). ^^.. 4] Samanya Machhuwa Sahkari Samittee, Maryadit, Ulkhar, Through Its president Krishna Kumar S/o. Dhani Ram Jaiswal, aged about : 36 years, R/o. Village : Ulkhar, Tahsil : Sarangarh, District : Raigarh (C.G.). J:ts'll:>"°. / Hyr). <aj^*0 5] Gram Panchayat Ulkhar, Through : Its Sarpanch, Gram Panchay.at Ulkh^r, Tahsil : Sarangarh, Djstrict : Raigarh h;(7y). ^^c^- ^^ T (C.G.). 6] Gram Panchayat Ulkhar, Through : Its Secretary, Gram Panchayat Ulkhar, Tahsil : Sarangarh, District : Raigarh (C.G.). ^of). US/fPV^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . HIGH COURT OF CHHMTISGARHAT BILASPUR Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Juskice Prashant Kvmar Mishra Writ P^ition (2271 No.787 / 2010 PETITIONERS REVtSIONERS RESPONDENTS Versus Kewat Machhuwa Swa Sahayata Samuh and another. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ S State of Chhattisgarh & others. Shri Pushpendra Kumar Patel, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Sushit Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the Starte. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICUE 227 OF THE CONSTrrUTK3N OF JNDIA ORALORDER (24.02.2010^ ChaUenge in this petition is to the interim order passed by the Addittonat CoUector in Reviston Case No. 35/A-89/2009-10, by which the stay appltoatton moved by the petitioners have been rejected. This Court ordinarily does not interfere wtth the interim order passe^l by the Courts below, in exercise cyf power under Arttete 227 of the Gonsttertion of Inctia. The revision is still pending adjudication before the AdditJonaJ Collector. This petition under Articte 227 of the Constitution of India is disposed of with a direction to the revisional authority to decide the petitioners revision as eariy as possibte and preferably within a period oftwomonths. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge ^-