IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL WRIT No. 4055 of 2005 BANWARI LAL V/S LR'S OF VISHNU KUMAR & ORS. Mr. OP MEHTA, for the appellant / petitioner Ms. HEMLATA CHOUDHARY for Mr. CHAITANYA GAHLOT, for the respondent Date of Order : 25.1.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned judgments. Both the learned Courts below have found that the petitioner has another shop in the name of his daughter-in- law, which was acquired some 5 years ago, and that could be used for the purpose, for which the necessity is alleged being the necessity of the son (husband of the daughter-in- law). Inter-alia with these findings, both the Courts below have negatived the contention, about the plaintiff's bonafide and reasonable necessity. I do not find any sufficient ground to interfere with the finding of fact. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/