1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.49 OF 2009 Venkatesh Karkera ..Petitioner. Vs. Jayraj Phatak The Mumbai Municipal Commissioner and others ..Respondents. .... Mr. C.K. Tripathi for the Petitioner. Ms. Shobha Ajithkumar for the Respondents. .... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 5th May, 2009. P.C. : The learned advocate appearing on behalf of the Municipal Corporation states that in pursuance of the order dated 3rd February, 2009 passed by the Division Bench the Assistant Municipal Commissioner ‘L’ ward has passed an order on 4th May, 2009. In the event that the Petitioner is aggrieved by the order, he would be at liberty to take recourse to the remedies available in law. Insofar as 2 the delay in passing the order is concerned, the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the Municipal Corporation tendered an unconditional apology on behalf of the deciding authority and stated that since the Assistant Municipal Commissioner was suffering from certain health problems, he was on leave as a result of which the order was passed only yesterday. Since an order has now been passed, it would not be expedient to pursue a petition in contempt jurisdiction any further. The Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed of. *****