IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20127 of 2009 1. OM PRAKASH SINGH 2. BARUN SINGH ------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for addition of section 307 IPC in the first paragraph of this application. He is permitted to do so. Accused of the case are alleged to enter informant’s house even some of them came on the roof, shot firing injuring the informant and taking away household articles. Number of accused who shot firing is six. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that previous enmity is there in between the parties that is why all the accused persons have been named in the F.I.R. but specific allegation about firing by an accused which hit the informant is not there and similar is the position regarding looting of household articles, which were looted but without specifying articles. Moreover accused persons - 2 - are next door neighbour even then there is no recovery at all, injury has also been found simple. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named two petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in Tarapur PS Case no. 54/08, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI