IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 23 OF 2011 MR. RAJENDRA NAYAK ... Petitioner Versus MR. RAVINDRA NAYAK ... Respondent Shri. C. Mascarenhas,Advocate for the Petitioner. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 14th January, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. C. Mascarenhas, learned Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. Having heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and having perused the record, I find that no case has been made out by the petitioner for this Court to exercise the supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. By the impugned order the trial court has rejected the application for amendment filed by the petitioner on the ground that the trial has already begun. Needless to mention that the dismissal of this writ petition will not come in the way of the petitioner from challenging the impugned order in the event decree is passed against the petitioner. A. P. LAVANDE, J. MF/-