HEGH COURT OF CHHA'E‘TISGARH AT BILASPUR ‘WRIT PETI’l‘IQN (S) N0. 123 0f2% PETITIONER : Mangalin Bai D/o Shri Ganga Ram? aged about i9 yaaw, R/o. Viilage Muiagaéaih, E’ost Baksahi: Tahsi] ‘Pali, Digit. Korba (CG) VERSUS Siate 9f Chhaitisgarh, Thmugh Secyetaxy, Pubiic Wm'kS Depam‘neui, Maniralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) '2. 3% Divigionai GEicer, Sub Divisiénai N0. 1, ‘ Public Works Department (FWD) Katghora., Disit. Kerb-a (CG) WRIT 1’E’1‘ITION UNDER AR'I‘ICLE 226 OF THE CON$’§‘1TU'HON OF 1NDIA RESPQNDENTS $3 HQn’hie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Vinod 'I‘ekam. Advocate for the yeiitioner. Shri Ajay Dwived‘é, Pane} Lawyer far 111a $mt~e/raspondents. QRAL QRDER (Pas‘ged m 24 t3! d‘ay af Janrikmy, 2008) By 1km petition, learned coungel appearing fox the petitioner submits {hat me petitioner was emp1oyed on 01.04.1985 as permanent Gangman in the Puhiic Werks Department. Katghora. Distxict Korha Whe has worked for more than 'ZS‘yearS as Gangman Seeks: a‘ reiief that the oetitioner beiog yermanent gangman be retired at the age of 62 years in accordance with the Chhatiisgarh Shashkiya Sevak. (Adhivarshikj-Ayu) Adhim'yam, 1967 (for short ‘the Act. 1967’) read with Fundamental Rule (fey short ‘F.R.’) 56. According to learned couasei for the petitionen the petitioner attained the Status of permanent employee. as defined under Rule 2(c) of the Chhattisgarh (Workcharged anti Contingency Paid Employees} Pension Rules 1979 (for shoxt ‘the Rules, E979). iiamed under Attiole 3G9 of the Constitution of India. Aii'er having attained the status of the pennanent I)x. empioyee, lbs petitioner wouid retire on attaining me aga Qf §2 yeam on superannuation uncier the grovismns ofthe Acg 1967. Laamed eounsel appearing for the peiitianer wouid submit that the case of the petitner is squarely covered by the decisicn ofihis Court passeii an 4m Januaryr 290? in Wi’. No. 108/2005 (Gomsi Vs. Staw 9f Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters. Learned. cmmseE appearing fer the respondemgfsmte does not disguie the subssion made by learned counseé f0! the pemiener. Accordingly, the petitiomr, who is a pemaaent gangmam is entitled to retire on atfaining the age of 62 years in accordance with the Act, 1967. The petitiorx is accoréingw ailowmi subjeci to verification ofthe facts. No erder M: Sd/- ‘ V ’ Satish K.Agnihotri \ ' Judge ‘ a to COStS 8 . io mi