1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 3786, 3625, 3627 & 3634 OF 2010. M/s. Forward Securities Ltd and another. -: VERSUS :- Ramesh D. Honawar and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 13, 2010. Heard Shri R. Darda, learned counsel for petitioners. Challenge is to order dated 07.03.2009 passed by the State Commission refusing to admit the appeals filed by the petitioner Company. Today affidavit has been filed stating that the orders dated 07.03.2009 passed at Nagpur were communicated to petitioners and that letter was received by them at Mumbai on 22.10.2009. They then requested their Advocate to apply for certified copies and certified copies were received on 27.01.2010. Thereafter present Writ Petitions are filed on 17.04.2010. Contention on merits of the controversy is all assets of the petitioners are already attached by the Debt Recovery Tribunal and hence petitioners have no funds whatsoever to meet their liabilities. Learned Counsel has 2 therefore earnestly requested this Court to protect the petitioners at least for a period of three months so as to enable them to get those properties released and to arrange for discharge of their liabilities, after the properties are released. I am not satisfied with the affidavit explaining delay and latches as filed. The order dated 07.03.2009 has been assailed in the writ petitions filed on 17.04.2010. The affidavit does not show any bonafides at all. I am, therefore not inclined to interfere in extra ordinary jurisdiction. Writ Petitions are therefore dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rgd.