IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-10563 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.05.2011 Rohit Kumar and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. J.S. Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in private complaint No.149 of 2009 dated 12.1.2009 under Sections 323/324/326/506/34 IPC, before the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Karnal. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in compliance of order dated 8.4.2011, petitioners had appeared before the trial Court and have already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court. He has further stated that petitioners shall keep on appearing before the trial Court as and when required. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, petition is allowed. Order dated 8.4.2011 is made absolute. (Alok Singh) Judge May 05, 2011 R.S.