Mmmm W? “4% / 5 c/wwLF G PETITIONER THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 05%9r OF 2011 / Narad Patel S/o Shri IGueduram Patel, aged about 57 yéars R/o Koshthapara Ward Jalampur, Dhamtari, Tahsil, Than’a and District Dhamtari (CG). VERSUS The Secretary, Yatimkhana Usmaniya, Anjuman Islamiya Committee, Dhamtari (CG). The Chhattisgarh Rajya Waqf Board, Raipur, through C.E.O. Raipur (CG). Sub Divisional Oiiicer cum Assistant Survey Commissioner, Waqf , Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (CG). Revenue Inspector, Dhamtan‘, District Dhamtan‘ (CG). f V g. WRIT PETITION UIA 226 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA 1 h .. I -_ 9? HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 3707 of2011 WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Slur: Satish K. Agnihom, J. Present: Shri AwadhTripathi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Praxeek Shanna, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. Shri Sashank Thaw, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 3' and 4. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 13 day ofJuly, 2011) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to alternative statutory forum as provided under section 83(2) ofthe WakfAct, 1995. Learned counsel appearing for other side have no objection. It is ordered aecordingly. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty, if so advised. Shri Shanna, learned counsel appearing for the Wakf Board submits that no coercive steps on the basis of the impugied order shall be taken against the petitioner for a period of 10 days ham today. On the request of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, certified copy ofthe impugted order may be returned back to the petitioner, on retaining a photocopy ofthe same. / “it Sdl- A ‘ satish K. Agnihotri V W f t ‘v l, Judge i7 Vii , x . PETITIONER Narad Patel. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The Secretary, Yatimkhana Usmania Anjuman Islamiya Committee & Others.