1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 1163 of 2010 Sandip v. The State of Maharashtra ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr K.S. Narwade, Adv for applicant Mr A. Parihar, APP for State Coram: A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 27th August 2010 1. It is the contention of learned counsel for the applicant that he is in custody since 7th August 2009 and despite direction issued by this Court to the trial Court to decide trial within three months, learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad has expressed his helplessness on the ground that many cases are pending before the Court including civil and MACT cases. 2. Under these circumstances, I think, applicant cannot be detained in custody for indefinite period considering his right to have a speedy trial. If sessions trial cannot be concluded inspite of specific direction by this Court issued on 8th February 2010 in criminal application no. 104 of 2010, applicant deserves to be released on bail. Hence, the following order is passed. 3. Applicant be released on bail on his executing PR in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- with two or more sureties in the equal amount provided 2 further that he will attend each date of hearing before the trial Court and applicant shall not tamper with prosecution evidence in any manner. Applicant is directed to inform his fixed address together with telephone/ cellphone number, if any, to the Court concerned and shall communicate change therein, if any, forthwith in future. Application stands disposed of accordingly. Judge. hsj