IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:17536 of 1999 Between: R.Venkateswara Rao S/o Pitchaiah Aipur P.A.C.S., Noothankal Branch, Atmakur (S),Mandal, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderanad. 2 The Collector, Nalgonda Nalgonda District. 3 The General Manager, Nalgonda District Cooperative Central Bank, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 4 The Aipur P.A.C.S Rep by its President Noothankal Branch, Atmakur (S) Mandal, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:NONE APPEARED Counsel for Respondent No.4: MR. T.AMARNATH GOUD The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of certiorari to quash order, dated 23.07.1999 whereby the petitioner was placed under suspension pending enquiry into the allegations against him. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. Heard Sri T.Amarnath Goud, learned counsel for respondent No.4. A perusal of the proceeding sheet shows that the impugned order was suspended on 23.12.1999. The learned counsel for respondent No.4 says that he is not aware of the present stage of the proceedings. However, considering the fact that the enquiry into the allegations against the petitioner is not stayed by this Court, it is reasonable to presume that the enquiry would have been held and completed and appropriate order passed. In this view of the matter, the cause in this writ petition shall be treated to have become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to question the final order, if any passed in pursuance of the enquiry, if such an order affects his interests. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 18th DECEMBER, 2008. kvni