o^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR M.A.NO. -^-^ 120 APPELLANT . Sabit Sahu, Aged about 32 ON-APPLICANT N0.2) ^years S/o Shri Bhanu Ram {Ch'~ Sahu, R/o Rest House, ''- »*''*? to.^^r Palari, P.S. Palari, Distt. Raipur, (C.G.) (Owner ofVehicle) VERSUS RESPONDENTNO.l /(CLAIMANT) / Tameshwar Prasad Baghel Aged about 59 years, S/o Late Narayan Prasad Baghel, R/o Village Semradih, P. S. Suhela, Tah. Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur, (C.G.). RESPONDENT N0.2 (^ON-APPLICANT N0.3) The New India Insurance Company, Through Branch Manager, P.0. Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur, (C.G.). RESPONDENT N0.3 (N'dN-APPLICANT N0.4) The N,ew India Insurance Corapany Limited, Divisional Office, P.0. Raipur, Dist. Raipur, (C.G.). w3r RESPONDENT N0.4 /APPLICANTNO.l) 4. Prem Lal Verma Aged (NON- about 20 years, S/o Ganesh Ram Verma, R/o Villae-Suhela, P.S. Suhela, Distt. Raipur, (C.G.) (Driver ofthe Vehicle) / MEMO OF APPEAL UNDER SECTION r73 OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988. XI-HC-22 sn^i'^i h-u* sn^i sbli'sb^lfig raiu w. 's^ "ill^li'l'il, axilu'is, facii'uy f^-fr 11*1?IT»11ch ^ 3ff^T,Tra^ /^- Q-^ s&........................... .....r > •^ 200 i fc|fc<ST' 3H^t ?^!IW(Tl?g ShriY.C. Sharma. Couns Lcamed counsel for this aopeal wifli Ubertv to file Considered. Appeal is disniissed as tl for tbe lappetlant pravs for witMraw 'tesh m accoidaiice .witli law. tlidrawu vuifh: aforesaid libei'h", chl<4ifl41l T{lH^f ^ fe1^ '•(.f^^R ^? stfigii an^r Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge