1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders C.P.NO.327/2007 Mr. A.S.Bayas adv. for petitioner Mr. S.K.Kadam, AGP for State. Mr. A.B.Dhongade adv. for R-2. CORAM : R. K. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 20 TH NOVEMBER, 2009. 1. By an order dated 22.03.2004 this court had granted interim relief in terms of prayer clause D and E of the petition directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with continuity and consequential benefits including the arrears of pay and promotion etc. Similarly, the effective operation , implementation of the order dated 13.1.2003, claim of the petitioner was also stayed and suspended. Inspite of this petitioner was not paid with monetary benefits. Hence, this contempt petition is filed. 2. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 has filed a pursis dated 13.11.2009 stating that order has been complied with. Shri Bayas the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner does not dispute this 2 position, however, argues that order has been complied with after a period of more than four and half years. This affidavit has been filed by one Pradip Shantinath Khobare Divisional Controller M.S.R.T.C, Osmanabad and in paragraph No.3 of the pursis he has stated as under :- “3. That the Deponent has obliged the orders of the court and there is some delay which is not deliberate or intentional for which the Deponent begs unconditional apology. The respondent no.2 in the Contempt petition is at present dismissed from service and the deponent has taken the charge as Divisional Controller, M.S.R.T.C at Osmanabad on June, 2009.” 3. In view of the aforesaid explanation, I do not find any reason to proceed with this contempt petition. Said is dismissed. [ R. K. DESHPANDE, J. ) ... Dt : 20.11.2009 aaa/327.07