IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2005 of 2011. Decided on: 6th April, 2011. Bhawana Mahajan. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG, for respondents No.1 to 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner, who is a PTA appointee is replaced by the 4th respondent, a regular appointee. According to the petitioner, there are vacant posts, where the 4th respondent can be accommodated. The petitioner may obtain the willingness from the 4th respondent to work in any of the vacancies, as pointed out by the petitioner and produce the same before the second respondent along with the willingness letter, in which case the second respondent will take steps to accommodate the 4th respondent against the resultant vacancy. The petitioner may be continued against such vacancy till she is otherwise replaced by a regular recruitee. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 6th April, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr/vt) Judge.