1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETIION NO.6949/2009 State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Ram Singh & Anr. DATE OF ORDER : 20.7.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA. Sh. Rajesh Bhati, Asstt to AAG. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The employee-respondent raised the dispute and upon which the dispute was referred to the labour court by the order of the State Government dated 3.10.1998. The labour court held that the employee-respondent worked for more than 240 days and in violation of Section 25(f) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the respondent-employee was retrenched. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent-employee work in different wing of the petitioner's department and i.e., a department of Indira Gandhi Canal Project. This aspect has been considered by the labour court and, thereafter, it has been held that the employee has served the petitioner-department for more than 240 days in a year and he has been removed without following the 2 procedure of law. I do not find any illegality in the impugned award dated 19th July, 2006 and, therefore, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed having no merit. (PRAKASH TATIA),J. Cpgoyal/-