IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38748 of 2008 SINGHESHWAR KUNWAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 18.03.2009 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. No one appears on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 despite having entered appearance. Affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Superintendent of Police. The petitioner is stated to be father-in-law. The submission is that the complainant is his daughter-in-law complaining after 14 years of marriage in collusion with the husband, the son of the present petitioner, for ulterior motive. The affidavit of the Superintendent of Police states that warrant of arrest have been issued by the trial court against the husband but that the same had not been released by the Court and served upon the Police Station. The submission appears to be inherently contradictory. This Court directs that the Superintendent of Police, Samastipur shall ensure that the Officer Incharge of Rosera Police Station collects the warrant of accused no. 2 from the court of the Magistrate concerned and shall execute the same within a period of two weeks from the date that the warrants are handed over to him. The provisional bail granted to the petitioner by order dated 23.10.2008 in Complaint Case No. 891 of 2007 pending before the SDJM Rosera is hereby confirmed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)