1) Crl. Misc. No.M-19291 of 2011 (O&M) Gulshan Kumar Vs. State of Haryana 2) Crl. Misc. No.M-19277 of 2011 (O&M) Gulshan Kumar Vs. State of Haryana Present : Ms. G.K. Mann, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, A.A.G., Haryana. ******* AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This order shall dispose of CRM-M Nos.19291 & 19277 of 2011. CRM-M No.19291 of 2011 has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of interim bail to the petitioner in case F.I.R. No.258 dated 1.9.2009 registered under Sections 302/34, 120-B IPC and Sections 25, 54, 59 of the Arms Act at Police Station Ambala Cantt. CRM-M No.19277 of 2011 has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of interim bail to the petitioner in case F.I.R. No.98 dated 3.3.2010 registered under Sections 302, 332, 353, 186, 307, 34, 120-B IPC and Sections 25, 54, 59 of the Arms Act at Police Station Ambala Cantt. The averments are that mother of the petitioner needs to undergo by-pass surgery at PGI, Chandigarh and the arrangements therefore have been finalized and the prayer here is that the petitioner may be released on interim bail. It is further stated that the petitioner has only one brother who is a proclaimed offender. It is further stated that to arrange the money for the operation there is a buyer who will immediately purchase the shop of the petitioner. Crl. Misc. No.M-19291 of 2011 (O&M) -2- On instructions from ASI Balbir Singh learned Assistant Advocate General has accepted the factual assertion that the mother of the petitioner is required to undergo by-pass surgery and that his brother is a proclaimed offender. However, learned Assistant Advocate General has very vigorously argued that the petitioner is a very bold criminal and the fact that his brother is a proclaimed offender also points to his propensity. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner would have no objection if he is escorted by the police even while on interim bail. On instructions from Jaswinder Singh, DDA, Prisons learned Assistant Advocate General has accepted that the State would be able to muster the necessary security to escort the petitioner at all times. In this view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to grant interim bail to the petitioner w.e.f. 16.08.2011 to 26.08.2011. Ordered accordingly. In all these times, the petitioner would be in the custody of the police who are directed to make necessary arrangements to ensure that the petitioner surrenders on 26.08.2011. Bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate with the above stipulations. Petitions stand disposed of. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of a connected case. ( AJAY TEWARI ) August 09, 2011 JUDGE ashish