IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 3RD JULY 2009 / 12TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 17542 of 2009(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MUHAMMEDKUTTY, S/O.KUNHAVA, KALARIKKAL HOUSE, K PURAM P.O., TANUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MALAPPURAM. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TANUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. ASMABI, D/O.HAMSAKKOYA, LAMUTTAKKATH, UNNIYAL, NIRAMARUTHUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.A.SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & P.BHAVADASAN, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.17542 of 2009 ------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd July, 2009 J U D G M E N T Raman, J. Petitioner's elder son, Al-Ameen, married the third respondent. Subsequently, he divorced her. Third respondent submitted a petition to the Circle Inspector of Police, the second respondent herein, for getting back the gold ornaments and an amount of Rupees One Lakh said to have been taken by the petitioner's son. Now, it is alleged that on the basis of the said complaint, second respondent is harassing the petitioner and his family. It is further stated that petitioner has nothing to do with the gold ornaments and the money and he has not received any such things from his son. It is alleged that such being the facts, the attempt of the second respondent to demand back the gold ornaments and the amount from the petitioner is nothing, but harassment. W.P.(C) No.17542 of 2009 2 2. The learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the State submits that no crime is registered against the petitioner till 28.6.2009. As at present, there is no complaint. This submission is recorded. However, it is made clear that in case the presence of the petitioner is required, a notice as contemplated under Section 160 of Code of Criminal Procedure may be issued. The writ petition is closed with the above observation. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE P.BHAVADASAN , JUDGE. nj.