^y H10H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 3249 of 2005 \fL.. PETITIONER JPSaiiititTs RESPONDENTS Defe«idaiits -^r-' 1. Pakla 8/0 Hari, aged 80 years. 2. Smt. Kuware Bai Widow of late Buddhu, aged about 57 years. 3. M^angal Das 8/0 Hera, aged 55 years. 4. KaiTtiu 8/0 Hera, aged 47 years. All 1 to 4 Caste Sataami R/o village Rmgriga Tah. Kota, Ditt. Bilaspur (CG). VERSUS 1. Hirondiya Bai W/o Gandram, aged 50 years. 2. Mahesh Ram 8/c Siyaram, aged 41 years Caste Gond, both are R/o village Ringriga Tah. Kota, Ditt. Bilaspur(CG). 3. Sagar Bai, aged 43 years, W/o Ganesh Ram 4. Bhagwan Singjh, aged 18 yrs. S/o Ganesh. 5. Mahendra Singh, aged 10 yrs. S/o Gaxiesh. 6. Ku. Kanti Bai, aged 17 yrs. D/o Ganesh 7. Ku. Shanti Bai, aged 15 yrs. D/o Ganesh 8. Ku. Surti Bai, aged 13 yrs, D/o Ganesh 9. Ku. Shukwara Bai, aged 11 yrs D/o Ganesh respondent No. 5,7,8,9 are minor thi'ou^i their natural giiardian mother Sagar Bai respondent No. 3, all respondent No. 1 to 9 are Cast Gond, R/o village Rmgriga, Tah. Kota, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). lO.Kamala Bai, aged 23 years D/o Ganesh Caste Gond, Ry'o village Kotmi, Tah. Pendra Road, Distt. Bilaspur (CO). 11. Raniya Bai, aged 68 years W/o Mukund. 12. Kalyan Singh, aged 48 yrs. S/o Mukund IS.Radho Singh, aged 38 yrs. S/o Siyaram. 14.Bharat Singh, aged 28 yrs. 8/0 Siyaram Caste-Gond all 11 to 14 are R/o Rin^-iga Tali. Kota, Distt. Bilaspur(CG). 15.Govmd Bai, aged 53 yrs W/o Padman Siagh Caste ^•"t^\ Sahu K\9- Gond, R/o village Sukhera Tah. Kota, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). 16.Tumodiya Bai, aged 48 yrs. W/o Mohati Singh, Caste Gond R/o Village Mohalee Tah. Kota, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). 17.Ahilya Bai, aged 30 yrs. W/o Bharat Singh, Caste Gond, R/o Village Kasaibahara, Tah. Kota, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). 18. State ofChhattisgarhthrough Colleetor, Bilaspur (CG). (WRIT PE'HTION UNT)ER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) CSB: Hon'ble Mr. Sattsh K. Aamhotri, J.) Present : None for the petitioner. No.ne for the respoiidents. ORALORDER (Passed on 30U> day ofJasauary, 2009) 1. The matter is called for hearmg twice. On bofh occasions, none appears nor any rq>resentation is made on behatfofthe petitioner. The petitioner mav not be interested in the matter. 2< In view ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. 3. Consequently, M(W)P No. 2774/05, stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge