IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.24456 of 2002 Between: Shek Mahmood, S/o. Sheik Yusoof R/o.Kamareddy, Nizamabad Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Managing Director, A.P.S.R.T.C., Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. Nizamabad. 3 The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Nizamabad. 4 Himachal Pradesh Apple Juice Stall at APSRTC Bus Station Kamareddy, Nizamabad Dist. rep. by its Proprietor Arjun Rao. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue appropriate Writ or order/direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in allowing the 4th Respondent to run fruit juice stall in the A.P.S.R.T.C Bus Station Kamareddy without inviting tenders is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.GIRI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.24456 of 2002 ORDER: The petitioner was licensee of the vacant space in bus station of Nizamabad for running fruit juice stall. He was required to pay the monthly rent of Rs.20,186/-. It appears, fourth respondent was also given licence. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner ﬁled the present writ petition seeking invalidation of the licence granted to the fourth respondent on the ground that allotment of other open space to fourth respondent is in contravention of understanding between the petitioner and second respondent. Petitioner’s lease was for a period of three years. Therefore, nothing survives in the writ petition. Even otherwise, petitioner has not placed any material before this Court to show that respondent Nos.2 and 3 agreed not to allow other fruit juice shop in the same premises where the petitioner was granted licence. The Writ Petition is misconceived, and the same is dismissed accordingly. No costs. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 31.10.2008 vs To 1 The Managing Director, A.P.S.R.T.C., Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. Nizamabad. 3 The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Nizamabad. 4 2CCs to 5 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SRAVAN}