IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2009 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 13760 of 2008(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- DR.KUNH AHAMED KUTTY, HONORARY PRESIDENT ASSOCIATION FOR WELFARE OF THE HANDICAPPED, P.B.NO.59, 17/194-A, M' SQUARE COMPLEX, PAVAMANI ROAD, CALICUT - 673 001. BY ADV. SRI.T.P.KELU NAMBIAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), CALICUT. 2. K.P.MOHAMMED, S/O.MOIDEEN KOYA, "DHANIYA", NELLIKKODE AMSOM, DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE - 17. ADV. SRI.SUNIL JACOB JOSE FOR R2 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.13760 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext.P9 order of the District Registrar of Societies, Kozhikode, wherein he has accepted the list of office bearers of the Association for Welfare of Handicapped, submitted by the 2nd respondent. The counsel for the petitioner submits that in so far as three suits have been filed between the parties in respect of the subject matter, the validity of Ext.P9 also can be gone into in those suits. Therefore, the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be disposed of without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the validity of Ext.P9 also in the said suits. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent as also the learned Government Pleader. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the validity of Ext.P9 also in the suits which are admittedly pending. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2