IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 16464 of 2008 Between: V. Saraswathi, W/o. Venkata Rao, R/o. Door No.12-2-10, Plot No.F2, Central Point Apartments, Dantuvari Street, Kakinada, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, East Godavari Dsitrict at Kakinada. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 3 The Tahasildar, Kakinada Rural Mandal, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly , one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in proposing to alienate the land of the petitioner admeasuring Ac.2.50 cents in Sy.No.297/1 of Timmavaram Village, Kakinda Rural Mandal, East Godavari District and in proposing to dispossess the petitioner therefrom, pending disposal of the statutory appeal being A/144/2007 before the 2nd respondent which was filed against the order in Ref.B/236/1996, dated 24-8-2007 of the 3rd Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. VENKATESWARLU POSANI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 16464 of 2008 Order: As against the order dated 24.08.2007, passed by the 3rd respondent, namely the Tahsildar, Kakinada Rural Mandal, East Godavari District, resuming the land in question to the Government, the petitioner preferred an appeal along with stay petition before the 2nd respondent, namely the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District, on 12.11.2007. While the said appeal is pending, the petitioner states that the respondents are trying to dispossess her from the land in question and alienate the same to some third parties. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: The 2nd respondent, namely the Revenue Divisional Officer, kakinada, East Godavari District, is directed to consider and dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, expeditiously. Till the disposal of the appeal, status quo obtaining as on today shall be maintained by the parties. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 30.07.2008 Note: Issue CC in two days (B/O) Nsr