IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY FRIDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2011 / 17TH ASHADHA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 4238 of 2009(D) -------------------------------------- [AGAINST THE ORDER IN M.P.NO. 3956/09 IN CRL.R.P.NO.12/2009 OF SESSIONS COURT, THODUPUZHA] .................... PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: ---------------------------------------- SAFIYA MOIDU, KUNHIYIL HOUSE, KALIYAR, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI. BY ADVS. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SRI.MANSOOR.B.H. RESPONDENT/STATE/COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, SUB DIVISINAL MAGISTRAGE, IDUKKI, REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. 2. SR.ANCY THENAMAMAKAL, MOTHER SUPERIOR, ADORATION CONVENT, KALIYAR P.O., VANNAPURAM, THODUPUZHA. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. JAIBY PAUL, R2 BY ADVS. SRI.MATHEW JOHN, SRI.AJEESH K.SASI. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRL.M.C. NO.4238/2009-D: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE.1: COPY OF THE ORDER IN PROCEEDING B3-3508/07 DTD. 11/11/2009. ANNEXURE.2: COPY OF THE CRL.R.P.NO.12/2009 OF SESSIONS COURT, THODUPUZHA. ANNEXURE.3: COPY OF THE ORDER IN M.P. NO. 3956/2009 IN CRL.R.P.NO.12/2009 DTD. 18/11/2009 OF SESSIONS COURT, THODUPUZHA. ANNEXURE.4: COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. B.P. RAY, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No. 4238 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of July, 2011. O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner who is the respondent in Crl.R.P. No. 12 of 2009 on the file of the Sessions Court, Thodupuzha, has challenged the order dated 18.11.2009 in Crl.M.P.No. 3956 of 2009 in Crl.R.P. No. 12 of 2009 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Thodupuzha. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that as against the impugned order, no revision lies and therefore the impugned order should be quashed. It is open to the petitioner to raise all the relevant points at the time of hearing the criminal revision itself. If such contentions are raised, the learned Sessions Judge shall consider and pass appropriate orders. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the objection has already been raised to that effect. The learned Sessions Judge shall dispose of the Criminal Revision Petition within three months from the date of receipt of a copy this order. This Crl.M.C. is disposed of as above. sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE. rv