IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 12-02-2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN W.P.No.2646 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 A.Deivanayagi W/o. Arumugam .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Head Office, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 2. The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Jyothi Nagar, Ernavoor, Chennai – 600 057. 3. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Jyothi Nagar, Ernavoor, Chennai – 600 057. .. Respondents. Prayer: This petition has been filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus and thereby direct the respondents to stop construction and installation of "Transformer" on the eastern side of petitioner's plot situated at Plot No.25, Kalaingar Nagar, Thiruvottriyur, Chennai – 600 019 and measuring 1750 Square Feet bounded on the North by Plot No.24, South by 20 Feet Road, East by 40 Feet Road, West by Plot No.26 within the Sub Registration District of Thiruvottriyur, Registration District of North Madras and consequentially direct them to remove the materials piled on the eastern side of petitioner's plot disturbing his ingress and egress to access his plot on the eastern side. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vijay Anand For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. Though the prayer sought for by the petitioner, in the present writ petition, is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 08.02.2010, is directed to be disposed of by the third respondent, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the third respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 08.02.2010, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The petitioner is directed to furnish to the respondent a copy of the representation, dated 08.02.2010, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. ogy Sd/- Asst. Registrar //True Copy// Sub Asst. Registrar To 1. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Head Office, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Jyothi Nagar, Ernavoor, Chennai – 600 057. 3. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Jyothi Nagar, Ernavoor, Chennai – 600 057. + 2 ccs to Mr. S. Vijay Anand, Advocate SR No.9331 W.P.No.2646 of 2010 TEJ(CO) SR/24.2.2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/