1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2241 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2009 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2248 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2009 Shri Sandeep Ramesh Sancheti .... Applicant. V/s Shri Haribhau Gadhve & Anr. ..... Respondents. Mr. Mandar Soman i/b Mr. T.D. Deshmukh for th applicant. Mr. U.B. Nighot for respondent No.1. Mr. J.P. Kharge, APP for the State. CORAM: V. M. KANADE, J. DATE : 28TH JUNE, 2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant, the learned APP for the State and the learned Counsel for the original complainant. 2. There is delay of 143 days in filing the appeal. 2 According to the applicant, his father-in-law was not well and, therefore, he was not in a position to file the applications in time. Counsel for the respondent, on the other hand, vehemently opposes these applications. He submits that the applicant’s father-in-law expired in February, 2009 and, thereafter, after lapse of two months the present applications have been filed. It is submitted that sufficient cause has not been shown for condonation of delay. 3. In my view, taking into consideration the explanation given by the applicant, delay of 143 should be condoned since the cause shown by the applicant, according to me, is sufficient. Delay is condoned. Applications for condonation of delay are allowed and disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.) 3