<*»- itf H!GH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR PET1T!ONER RtSPQNDENTS WRIT PETiTEON N0. 2514 OF 2003 Atul Shukla, S/o Shri Sudama Prasad Shuk!a, aged about' 33 years, R/o Green Park CoJony, Jarahabhata, Biiaspur (CG). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Mlning, Mantralaya, PKS Bhawan, Ralpur 2. Director, Mining, Directorate Gsology & Mjnlng, Khanij Bhawan, Ring Road - 1, Raipur (CG). 3. Coiiector, Mahasamund. 4, Officer on SDecial 'Dutv, Dlrectorate Geoiogy and Mlning, Khanij Bhawan, Rmg Road-~1,RaJpur(CG). 5. Deepak Jalswal, S/o AchheSal JaiswaS, Devendra Nagar, Riapur (CG). (Writ petitlon under Article 226/227 of the Constitutlon of Sndia) SlngEe Bench : Hon'ble Shri S.atish K. Agnihotrl, J. Present:" Shri Chandresh Shrlvasfava, counsei for the petjtioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State- Ms Monsha Chhatri, counsei for the respondent No.S. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 11th day of August, 2009) . Learned counsel for .. the petltloner, cn instructions, subrnits that with the passage of tlme, thls has become Infructuous, to whlch iearned counsel appearlng for the respondents have no objectlon. • 2. It Is ordered, as prayed for. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become j-nfi-uctuous. Consequently, M.(W.).P.No.2301/2003 stands dlsposed of. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge