IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.5473 of 2008 Date of Decision: 07.07.2009. Dharam Singh .....Petitioner Versus Shri Hari & Anr. .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. N. JINDAL Present: Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Atul Yadav, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 7. A.N. JINDAL, J **** Respondent No.9 has refused to accept notice. Respondent No.10 is proforma respondent. As such service is complete. After hearing the counsel for the parties at length it is directed that the petitioner shall make the payment of the court fee in the light of Section 7 as amended by Haryana Act No.22 of 1974 and the suit shall continue. However, the Court would be at liberty to frame issue with regard to the Court fee and decide it along with other issues on merits. At that time impugned order will not stand in the way of the Court decide the issue of Court fee. Disposed of accordingly. July 07, 2009 (A.N. JINDAL) Sham JUDGE