^ .^. TI Slngle Bench IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Cr.M.P. No. ^^) / 2011 PETITIONER : RESPONDENTS •i;^'. • Kisan Kumar Gajendra, S/o Shri Haricharan Gajendra, aged about 43 years, R/o Shanker Nagar Mahasamund, Tahsil and Distt.- Mahasamund (C.G.) Praveen Kumar Khanna, S/o. , ^\<\ ^5 Rajkumar Khanna, aged about 30 xv"5s^C«'"" Yeare> R/o"ward No' 21 lmlibhatha >C~\y^ Mahasamund, Tahsil and Distt.- VERSUS .^••^^' ^.3i'"\ .••• '-^^' ,\^^ y^o Mahasamund (C.G.) PETITION UNDER SECTION 482"OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CQDE1973 .^ ^ A...-^^ S y^A^ .'Q SB : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICB SSANINDRA MOHAM SHSIVASTAVA *VAi>* • Versus iiisaii Kumar Gajendra Praveen Kuaiar Khanna PBTJTIONU3SDER SBCTION 482 0¥THB CO-DE O^CSBSS&Mi Shri N.K-Chatterjee, counsel for fhc petitioner. Counsel for fhe petitioner submits tbat though the appUcation for suspension of seatence and grant of bail filed by the petitioner was allowed, while aUowiag ttie app3ication, condition for deposifiag the ainouDt of coinpensatiou was iraposed upon him. He subaits fhat the trial court ordered tor paym.ent of coiupensation of Rs. 1,85,000. Thougb ia tbe petition it has been stated that tbe petitioner is no't in a posiuon to deposit tfae amount of coinpensatioD. it has not been. stated aaywhere wifh. regard to fhe financial condition of tBe petitioner or his status but a baid statemeat has been. iaad£. Consideriiig that the petitioner has beea coavictcd by fh.e trial Court aad in appeal the senten.ee has been siispended tsy tmposu^ condition. of paynient of compensation, I d.o not find fhat the condition iinposed is so harsh for the petitioner or it is impossible for him to fiilfiU particularly wheu the petitioner has not disclosed in tfae petition the status or Jiis fmaacial coadition. However it is oidcred fhat fhe ainount deposited by the petitioner sh.an be kept in. a fixed The oetitiou is accordinglv, disposed of. ^- • -M. ^ s^stava ^>^»IAs.'"