IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 11.11.2010 COCP No.1771 of 2010 Raj Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Arun Goel and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr. M.K.Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Sahu, AAG, Punjab, for the respondents. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) In the reply filed on behalf of respondent No.3, it has been pointed out that the withheld amount of gratuity and interest on the said amount has been paid to the petitioner. In the reply, it has been also pointed out that no recovery on account of retrenchee as well as special increments has been effected from the petitioner, whereas the retrial dues such as death- cum-retirement gratuity, leave encashment, GIS and pension have already been released. In view of the above, no further orders are called for in the present contempt petition. The same is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to submit a representation, if the petitioner has any other subsisting claim from the Department. 11.11.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE