-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.1319 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.1319 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.1319 OF 2005 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: MAY 4, 2006. MAY 4, 2006. MAY 4, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Advocate for the Appellants. The Appellants are the original defendants. The Trial Court passed a decree for partition which is modified to some extent by the Appellate Court. 2. After having heard the Advocate for the Appellants, I find no reason to interfere with the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the Courts below regarding the share of the original Plaintiff in the suit property. No substantial question of law arises. Second Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. -2- Judge. Judge. Judge.