1 UNREPORTED IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.3368 OF 2010. Vyankateshwar Shikshan Samitee, Latur, through its President Mallikarjun Madhavrao Navande, Age 56 years, Occ.Retired, R/o Near Shivaji Chowk, Latur. ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, School Education Department, Government of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2. The Director of Education, Maharashtra State, Latur. 3. The Dy.Director of Education, Latur, Region Latur. 4. The Education Officer (Secondary),Zilla Parishad, Latur. ... Respondents. ... Mr.S.G.Rudrawar, advocate for the petitioner Mr.S.K.Kadam,Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the State. ... 2 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3373 OF 2010 Gurukrupa Adiwasi Mahila Shikshan Sanstha, through its President Jayashri Gyandeo Gavit, Age 48 years, Occ.Service, R/o Pinjarzadi, Tal.Sakri, Dist. Dhule. ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, School Education Department, Government of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2. The Director of Education, Maharashtra State, Pune. 3. The Dy.Director of Education, Nasik, Region Nasik. 4. The Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Dhule. ... Respondents. ... Mr.S.G.Rudrawar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.K.Tambe, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the State. ... WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3374 OF 2010 Damodher Bahuudeshiya Samajik and Shaikshanik Trust, through its President, Madhukar Damodher Sawant, Age 44 years, Occ. Social work, A-1, First Lane, Ramanagar, Kranti Chowk, Aurangabad. ... Petitioner. 3 Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, School Education Department, Government of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2. The Director of Education, Maharashtra State, Pune. 3. The Dy. Director of Education, Aurangabad, Region Aurangabad. 4. The Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. ... Respondents. ... Mr.S.G.Rudrawar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.K.Tambe, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for the State. ... CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 23.04.2010. ORAL JUDGMENT (Per P.V.Hardas,J.) 1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, these petitions are heard finally at the stage of admission. 2. At the outset, learned counsels for the 4 parties agree that the controversy raised in the present petitions stand squarely covered by the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.355/2010, dated 8.4.2010. The learned Asstt. Govt. Pleaders state on instructions that pursuant to the aforesaid judgment, the Government would examine the proposals of the petitioners afresh in accordance with law by the end of May, 2010. 3. We accordingly allow these petitions in the light of the judgment of this Court rendered in Writ Petition No.355/2010 dated 8.4.2010 and accepting the statement made by the learned Asstt. Govt.Pleaders, we make rule absolute on the above terms with no order as to costs. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (P.V.HARDAS,J.) asp/office/wp336810