IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST APRIL 2009 / 11TH CHAITHRA 1931 SA.NO. 277 OF 2002(Y) ------------------------------- AS.14/1996 OF SUB COURT, SULTHAN BATHERY OS.22/1982 OF MUNI-MAGI.COURT,MANANTHAVADY .................... APPELLANT(S): APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS: ------------------------------------------------------------ K.T.KUNHIKRISHNAN NAIR (DIED) 1.SANKARA KURUP, AGED 33 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, PANNIYODI VEETTIL, ANCHUKUNNU AMSOM, VILAMBUKANDAM DESOM, MANANTHAVADY TALUK. 2. M.P.SADANANDAN MASTER, S/O. C.K.RAGHAVAN NAIR, PANAMARAM HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER, VIJAYAMANDIRAM, EACHOM AMSOM DESOM, MANANTHAVADY. 3. V.SANKARAN, PANAKKAL BUSINESS, EACHOM DESOM, MANANTHAVADY TALUK. 4. P.R.BALAKRISHNAN KARTHAVU, POOKALATHIL, VILAMBUKANDAM DESOM, MANANTHAVADY TALUK. 5. E.K.KUNHIKRISHNAN NAIR, S/O. KAREINAN VEETTIL GOPALAN NAIR, VILAMBUKANDAM DESOM, MANANTHAVADY TALUK. 6. N.K.GANGADHARAN, EACHOM BHAJANA MANDIRAM PRESIDENT, ANCHUKUNNU AMSOM, EACHOM DESOM MANANTHAVADY TALUK. 7. SECRETARY, EACHOME BHAJANA MANDIRAM, ANCHUKUNNU AMSOM, EACHOM DESOM, MANANTHAVADY TALUK. 8. BALAN, S/O. MADHAVAN, VILAMBUKANDAM, ANCHUKUNNU, MANANTHAVADY TALUK. 9. PONNU, S/O. KESAVAN, RESIDING -DO- 10. RAMACHANDRAN, S/O. CHATHAPPAN NAIR, RESIDING -DO- 11. DAMODARAN NAIR, S/O. AMMAN NAMBIAR, RESIDING -DO- 12. N.K.GANGADHARAN, RESIDING -DO- BY ADV. SRI.T.A.RAMADASAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF. ----------------------------------------------------------- C.A.KUNHIRAMAN NAIR, S/O. EDACHANA AMMINI NETTIAR, AGRICULTURIST, KALPETTA AMSOM DESOM, SOUTH WYNAD TALUK. ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- S.A.No.277 of 2002 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of April, 2009. JUDGMENT This appeal came up for hearing before me on 18.2.2009 and again on 19.3.2009. That day, counsel for appellants submitted that in spite of registered notice given to the appellants, they have not turned up. Appellants were called, found absent and the appeal was posted for disposal on 24.3.2009, then on 26.3.2009, 30.3.2009 and again on this day. Learned counsel for appellants submits that he has no instruction as appellants have not turned up in spite of registered notice. Appellants are absent. Counsel for respondents submits that she is informed that the parties have settled the matter outside the court. Hence the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. C.M.P.No.797 of 2002 will stand dismissed. THOMAS P.JOSEPH, Judge. cks 2 Thomas P.Joseph, J. S.A.No.277 of 2002 JUDGMENT 1st April, 2009.