IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 25TH JULY 2011 / 3RD SRAVANA 1933 RP.No. 496 of 2011 ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.19732/2010 DTD.23.03.2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/ PETITIONER: ---------------------------------------- S.DEEPAKUMARI, AGED 32 YEARS, D/O. SUKUMARA KURUP, (U.P.S.A.,P.G.M.H.S, PARAKODU - PRESENTLY RETRENCHED) PATHANAMTHITTA RESIDING AT REMALAYAM,EZHAMKULAM,PARAKODE PO. BY ADV. SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION KERALA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION PATHANAMTHITTA AT THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT - 689 645. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689 645. 5. HEADMISTRESS P.G.M.G.H.S PARAKODE PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT 691 554. 6. THE MANANGER, P.G.M.G.H.S PARAKODE PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT 691 554. RP.No. 496/2011 7. T.SMIHTA RAJAN, UPSA P.G.M.G.H.S PARAKODE P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT - 691 554. 8. ARYA ARAVIND, W/O.P. VINOD ANUPAMA AERAM, THADICADU P.O ANCHAL, KOLLAM - 691 554. BY SRI.V. VIJULAL, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: RP.No. 496/2011 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE 1: COPY OF RELEVANT PAGES OF WP(C) 19732/10. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. // True Copy // P.A. to Judge. smp T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- Review Petition No.496 OF 2011 IN W.P.(C) No.19732 OF 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of July, 2011. O R D E R The petitioner has filed this review petition by pointing out that the writ petition filed was not one challenging G.O.(P) No.10/2010/G.Edn. dated 12.01.2010 and the case was wrongly included in the batch of cases wherein the challenge was against G.O.(P) No.10/2010/G.Edn. dated 12.01.2010. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition is one challenging the appointment of the 7th respondent under the Compassionate Appointment Scheme which is covered by Rule 51B of Chapter XIV-A of Kerala Education Rules. A perusal of the writ petition shows that the challenge was not against G.O.(P) No.10/2010/ G.Edn. dated 12.01.2010. R.P. No.496/2011 2 Therefore, the review petition is allowed and the judgment is recalled. The writ petition will be reposted. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp