THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.5676, 5844, 5859 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: These three civil revision petitions arise out of a common order, 18.11.2009, passed in Miscellaneous Petition Nos.304, 305 and 306 of 2009 filed in F.C.O.P.No.1016 of 2008 on the file of the Additional Family Court, Hyderabad. The petitioners filed the F.C.O.P. against the respondent with a prayer to declare them as guardians for the two minor children of the respondent through his wife Zakiya Begum, who is the daughter of the petitioners. The trial of the F.C.O.P. commenced and the evidence on behalf of the petitioners was concluded. The evidence on behalf of the respondent is also said to have been concluded. At that stage, the petitioners wanted to file certain documents in relation to the denial of anticipatory bail to the respondent, his involvement in S.C.No.482 of 2004 and progress reports etc., of the minor children. The trial Court partly allowed the applications by directing that document Nos.1 to 4 shall be taken on record without the necessity of recalling the witness or reopening the F.C.O.P. and that document Nos.5, 6 and 7 are not necessary. The petitioners feel aggrieved by the same. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent. The trial Court itself found that document Nos.1 to 4 are relevant and they can straightaway be taken on record without the necessity of recalling the witness. The petitioners contend that document No.5 is relevant to prove the duration of imprisonment of the respondent and document Nos.6 and 7 for the purpose of apprising the Court, of the manner, in which, the minor children are being imparted the education. This Court is of the view that those three documents also can be taken on record in the same manner as document Nos.1 to 4 were taken. Hence, the civil revision petitions are allowed and the common order, dated 18.11.2009, is modified to the effect that the other documents mentioned therein, namely, document Nos.5 to 7 shall also be taken on record. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:03.08.2010 kdl