IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2011 / 21ST CHAITHRA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 2718 of 2011() ----------------------------- CP.145/2007 of J.M.F.C.,THIRUVALLA CRIME NO.449/2007 OF THIRUVALLA POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED A2-A5 --------------------------------------------- 1. LISON K.J., AGED 28 YEARS, KIDANGAN HOUSE, PORKULAM VILLAGE, THALAPPALLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. JOMON, S/O.JOSE, AGED 27 YEARS, THARAYIL HOUSE, CHIYARAM VILLAGE, THALAPPALLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. ALEX, S/O.DASAN, AGED 27 YEARS, NANDAN THIRITHIL HOUSE,CHIYARAM VILLAGE, THALAPPALLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.AJITH MURALI RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ----------------------------------------------- Bail Appln.No.2718 of 2011 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 11th day of April, 2011 ORDER Petitioners, who are accused Nos.2, 5 & 4 in C.P.No.145 of 2007 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Thiruvalla, seek anticipatory bail. 2. Consequent on the non-appearance of the petitioners in C.P.No.145 of 2007 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Thiruvalla, non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioners. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioners should not surrender before the Magistrate and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioners surrender before the Magistrate and file an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same day on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioners and also after considering the explanation offered by the petitioner for their previous non-appearance. With the above observation this application is disposed of. Dated this the 11th day of April, 2011. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. skj