1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.: 285 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders. appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. CONT. PETITION NO.:285 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.:7694 OF 2009 *** Dr. Bapurao Vaijnath Kamble VERSUS Dr. A P Manekar And Anr *** Mr. Deshpande Ajay S. And Manjusha Deshpande, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. D. V. Tele, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2. *** 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and learned A.G.P. for the Respondent/ State Authorities. 2. The Respondent No.1 has filed additional affidavit with undertaking that he will disburse the admissible amount of encashment of leave to the petitioner after getting approval from the higher authorities within a period of 40 days from today. It is further stated in the additional affidavit that the said amount would be disbursed subject to the final decision of writ petition No.7694 of 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.: 285 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders. appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. 2009. Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that he will furnish undertaking stating therein that in case the recovery is upheld or not quashed and set aside, he will deposit the entire disbursed amount with the Respondent No.1. 3. Contempt petition is disposed of. Notice stands discharged. [S. S. SHINDE, J.] Dated:18/10/2011. ans/285