IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13876 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 03, 2011 Narain Singh ...Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Jagbir Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner remained absent from duty after submitting a leave application. He was treated as absent and was proceeded against. After holding regular enquiry, the petitioner has been imposed a penalty of stoppage of one increment with temporary effect. The aspect that the petitioner had submitted an application for leave was not considered is not the valid argument, which can justify the absence of the petitioner. I am, thus, not inclined to invoke extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction of this court. If the petitioner has any grievance against non-release of D.A.bills, he may pursue his remedy with the department. Dismissed. August 03, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE