IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.21294 of 2010 Date of Decision: November 30, 2010 Gurmeet Kaur .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab and others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. G.K.S. Taank, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing selection and appointment of respondent Nos.3 to 6 as Peons in District Courts, Sangrur. 2. The only contention of learned counsel is that the petitioner is better qualified than the private respondents and therefore, per-se the petitioner was required to be selected and appointed. 3. It is not in dispute that selection CWP No.21294 of 2010 [2] process involved interview and the petitioner was also interviewed. The selection process itself is not under challenge. 4. No ground for interference in extraordinary writ jurisdiction is made out. 5. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) November 30, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?