?'?'?:; g" ^l?'"'1' ";;:;~%g CP(o^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASUR FC.G.] WRIT PETITION FS1 NOSV^~/2006 PETITIONER A^<\^ .^>^>y ^M:^ RESPONDENTS ,;• tt i^ \ J^- ^rfa^ Chandra Shekhar Soni, / S/o Late Shri Ram Kurnar Soni, aged about 40 years, Working as Patwari, P.H.No. 14, Jheel Patan, R/o Jheel, Patan, Durg, Districti Durg, [C.G.] Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh through its --' Secretary,Department of Revenue^ 'i- Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan^Raipur [C.G. 2. Collector [Land Revenue]^ " Branch Durg, District Durg [C.G.] 3. Sub Divisional Officer Patan, Durg H.O. Durg District Durg [C.G.] 4. Tehsildar. Patan, Durg Dista-ict Durg [C.G.] WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS XI-HC-22 3D^T^T R-ii+sn^r SbHich 'uTsfl &adma tnWfTShllth fsf -^M\v\^, wi5\wis, Rifii^y 3:fT^T*4ath ShiKn ' 200x Rl<)«d 18.10.2006 Smt Fouzia Mirza, counse| Shri Utkarsh Verma, by Heard on admission and or) Vide order dated 23.06. District Ciurg to Oistrict Rsipui] filing this petition on 12.10.20061 been transferred without compl^ will be effected by this tronsfer So far period of three yi years does not constitute the gs As far as seniority is concerned that case, petitioner s seniority prescribed Rules. Therefore, t order passed by the Soyernmen t>ur9 to Oistrict Raipur. In the result, the petitioi accordingiy dismissed. In the light of above ord. stand disposed of. +i<<(ci'sfl-i t<iKdTfftoit<R]K]< ^Stf^T 311^1 for the petitioner. 'A for the State/respondents No.l to 4. M.(W.)P.No.4342/2006. 306, petitioner has been transfer'red from Petitioner has challenged the order by infer-alia on the 9round that petitioner has iting three years at Durg and his seniority iars is concerned; non-completion of three |ound of m.alice on the part of Sovernment. if seniority is maintained district wise, in s going to be reguiated in accordance with lere is no material to interfere with the to transfer the petitioner from t>istrict is liable to be dismissed summarily and is [r, IA Nos. 10141, 10193 & 10194 of 2006 Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge (<Ny^)