IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 209 of 2006 (M/B) Smt. Vedwati Singh W/o Sri S.P. Singh, R/o P3/40 Yamuna Colony, Dehradun. ………. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Secretary, Irrigation Department, Dehradun. 2. Chief Engineer, Irrigation Department, Dehradun. 3. Executive Engineer, Irrigation Department, Dehradun. 4. Sri S.K. Balooni, Dairy Wale, R/o Moh. Govind Garh, Dehradun. 5. Sri S.K. Gupta, Executive Engineer (Retd.), R/o Govind Garh, Dehradun. 6. Sri R.C. Sharma, Junior Engineer, Vidyut Vibhag, Dehradun. 7. Sri K. Kaushal, Retired Head Clerk, R/o Mohalla Govind Garh, Dehradun. …… Respondents Mr. Abdul Wahid, Advocate for the petitioner. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon. Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon. M.M. Ghildiyal, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Abdul Wahid, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Petitioner Smt. Vedwati Singh has filed this writ petition styled as ‘Public Interest Litigation’ for the following reliefs: “i. Issue order or direction to the respondent No. 1, 2 & 3 that immediate enquiry may be set up for legal action against the unauthorized occupants. “ii. Grant any other or further relief which this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the present case.” 3. From Annexure 4, we gather that the petitioner has submitted a complaint before Lok Ayukt, Uttaranchal also for the redressal of the grievances projected in the writ petition and the same is pending enquiry before the Lok Ayukt. 4. In this view of the matter, the petitioner cannot be permitted to pursue parallel proceedings in this writ petition. 5. The petitioner, however, shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application before the Lok Ayukt for expeditious disposal of the petitioner’s complaint. 6. With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 02.03.2006 02.03.2006 G