IN THE HIGH COUR T OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11199 of 2011 Most.Gauri Devi, Wife of Late Kailash Prasad Thakur, Resident of Village – Ganaul, P.S. – Bihpur, P.O. – Bharatkhand (Dorhi), District – Bhagalpur. . ---------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Engineer-in-Chief, Sinchai Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 3. Chief Engineer, National Rural Employment Programme , Patna. 4. Executive Engineer, National Rural Employment Programme Special Division, Court Campus, Bhagalpur. 5. Accountant General, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna. ---------- Respondents ----------- 2 14.07.2011 Heard Sri Amod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ashok Kumar Gupta, learned AC to SC No. 16 who appears on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4/State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 5/Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. The petitioner in the present writ petition has prayed for directing the respondents to pay arrear of family pension. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is getting family pension but arrear of difference of revised family pension has not been paid. The present writ petition has been filed before this court without demanding justice from the concerned authority. Directly the petitioner has approached this court. After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to file a detailed representation before respondent no. 4/Executive Engineer, National Rural Employment Programme, Special Division, Court Campus, Bhagalpur. The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file representation before respondent no. 4. If such 2 representation is filed, respondent no. 4 is directed to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no. 4 considers the grievance of the petitioner as genuine he is required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, respondent no. 4 is directed to pass speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within three months from the date of filing of such representation. The writ petition stands disposed of. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)