FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WP/9545/2010 WITH WP/10513/2010, WP/448/2011, WP/2106/2011, WP/2152/2011 & WP/3758/2011 RAJENDRA DAULAT PATIL AND ANR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Shri Pawar Ajay D. AGP for Respondent(s): Shri Suryavanshi K.M. ... CORAM : D B BHOSALE & S B DESHMUKH, JJ. Dated: June 29, 2011 ... 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Shri Pawar, learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners will be satisfied if they are allowed to submit proposals for time bound promotion to the concerned respondent and directions are issued to consider their proposals in the light of the orders passed by this Court in Writ Petition Nos.2362 of 2009 and 1485 of 2010 dated 21.4.2009 and 30.7.2010 respectively. He submits, in that event, he has instructions not to press these petitions on merits. The petitioners states that when they made an attempt to submit their proposals, through their employer, the respondent did not accept the same. Keeping that in view and considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, we are satisfied that these petitions can be conveniently disposed of by the following order. (A) The petitioners shall submit their proposals to the concerned respondents through their employer / management within a period of four weeks from today. (B) If the proposals, as aforementioned, are submitted by the petitioners, concerned respondent FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS (2) WP/9545/2010 shall consider and decide the proposals as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the proposals, on merits in accordance with law. (C) It is open to the petitioners to rely upon the orders passed by this Court in the aforementioned Writ Petitions in support of their claim. (D) If for any reason, prima facie, the concerned respondent is not inclined to allow the proposals, he shall grant an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners before disposing them of. (E) It is needless to mention that the concerned respondent shall communicate the order passed on the petitioners proposal within a period of four weeks from the date of the order. 3. With these observations, all the Writ Petitions are disposed of. It is made clear that while passing this order, we have not examined merits of the case. All contentions of the parties are kept open. (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) akl