1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.782 OF 1999 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.19 OF 2006 Baldeosingh Pabla ..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Ms.Purnima Mittal i/b G.J.Mohan Rao for the Petitioner. Mr.A.P.Vanarse, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. Mr.Vijay Patil for Respondent No.5. .... CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : F.I.REBELLO, J. AND F.I.REBELLO, J. AND F.I.REBELLO, J. AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. J. J. 24th February, 2006. P.C. : The grievance in these proceedings under Article 226 relates to (i) the unauthorized user of 2 the premises by the 7th and 8th Respondents for industrial purpose in a residential zone and (ii) the unauthorized construction alleged to have been carried out by the 7th and 8th Respondents. Without going to the merits of the controversy, this Petition can be disposed of by directing the 5th Respondent to treat the Petition as a representation and to pass the orders in accordance with law after hearing the affected parties within a period of two months. The Petition is disposed of. In view of the disposal of the Petition, the Civil Application is rendered infructuous and is accordingly disposed of. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.) ‘