... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.937 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.937 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.937 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri U.V.Nikam, A.P.P for the Respondent. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 20, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 20, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 20, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned A.P.P pointed out that against the order of conviction and sentence, the Applicant had preferred Criminal Appeal No.315 of 1994. The said Appeal has been dismissed and this court has not granted benefit of section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to the Applicant. 2. In view of this statement, it is obvious that by this Application, benefit under section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 cannot be granted. Hence, Application is rejected. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE