IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14576 of 2010 1. HIRDYA NAND SINGH, son of Shiv Pujan Singh 2. Bathu Singh, son of Shiv Pujan Singh Both residents of village – Mowap Khurd (Jeevan Tala) P.O. and P.S. – Imadpur, District – Bhojpur. -------------- Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --------- Opposite Party. ------- 04. 11.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. It is submitted that petitioner no.2 Bathu Singh had already been arrested. Hence, the prayer to his extent become infructuous. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous with respect to petitioner no.2. So far petitioner no.1 Hirdya Nand Singh is concerned, he is one of the named accused, but carries allegation of giving one Lathi blow to Raj Bansi Singh in protest of Panchayati. There is nothing regarding injury report of said Raj Bansi Singh in the order of learned Sessions Judge, in spite of the fact that he has before passing order gone through the case diary. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks of receipt of the copy of this order, petitioner, namely, Hirdya Nand Singh, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara, in connection with Imadpur - 2 - P.S. Case No. 04 of 2010, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, the liberty shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)