: 1 : USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2211 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.616 OF 2009 Dattaram S. Tirlotkar & Ors. .. Plaintiffs v/s. Anand S. Rao and Ors. .. Defendants ......... Mr. Pankaj Kawli i/by P.P. Kulkarni for the plaintiffs Mr. Pooniwala i/by Y.R. Shah for defendant no.2 Mr. Swapnil Bangur i/by Prakash Devji Goriya for defendant nos.3 to 5. ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 17th JUNE, 2010. P.C. : 1. As the motion was called out, learned Counsel for the plaintiffs states that plaintifs would like to amend the plaint and thereafter apply for a fresh motion for appropriate interim reliefs. : 2 : 2. In view of this submission across the bar, the request can be granted as it is reasonable. Hence, the following order. ORDER (i) Motion is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to apply for amendment of the plaint and after the plaint is amended, plaintiffs are free to take out appropriate motion for appropriate interim reliefs. (ii) No views are expressed on the merits of the matter. There shall be no order as to costs. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)