IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15740 of 2008 NAGESHWAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 21/10/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case under Sections- 302, 147, 148, 149, 341, 307, 323, 324, 353, 427 and 435 of I.P.C., 27 of the Arms Act, and 17 of the C.L.A. Act. It is submitted that the petitioner is not one of the 18 named accused who were accompanied by 26 other male and female extremists. The impugned order of rejection, from para- 105 of the case diary and paragraphs-7, 20, 32 of the case diary, notices that the petitioner was a contractor. That he had allegedly given food and accommodation to the extremists. Learned counsel for the State points out to the impugned order to submit from para-128 of the case diary that ‘sufficient materials’ had been collected against the petitioner. The impugned order of rejection does snot consider any further materials except what has been noticed above from the case diary. In any event, the recitals in the impugned order do not reflect his - 2 - participation in the occurrence at this stage. Considering all of the same, let the petitioner above named surrender before the court below within six weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail during the period of investigation, till submission of charge-sheet upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Amas P.S. Case No.103/07, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )