IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 844 OF 2007 Ravindra Dyanoba Sartale & Ors. ..... ..... ...Appellants. V/s Shriang Sada Shinde & Ors. ..... ..... ...Respondents. Mr.Prashant P. Jadhav, Adv. for the appellants. None for the respondent. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 18th FEBRUARY, 2009. PC: The defendants had moved the Tahsildar under section 143 of the Land Revenue Code claiming right of way. Tahsildar had granted said right in favour of the defendant. Aggrieved by the order passed by the Tahsildar the plaintiff moved the civil Court under sub-section 4 of section 143 with a prayer to set aside the order passed by the Tahsildar and also sought injunction against the defendants, their servants and agents not to disturb the peaceful possession of the plaintiff over the suit property. On the basis of evidence on record the trial Court has found that the approach way claimed by the defendant was closed 30/40 years back and hence decreed the suit and granted relief prayed for. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the trial court defendant/appellant herein filed an appeal. The first appellate court concurring with the view taken by the trial 1 court confirmed the finding of trial court and grant of relief of injunction in favour of the plaintiff and dismissed the appeal. Against the said judgment present appeal has been filed. Perused the impugned judgment. Same does not call for any interference. No substantial question of law emerges for consideration. Hence appeal is summarily dismissed. 18.2.2009. 2