' ^ (^y { s-v/_ r? ^q^^-. ''-~ ^SByS^ "~5eT>;%h IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH —^3-TSo°^ W.P.(S) N0. /; PETITIONER:- .h/^. V/.ff' ,••' _^y ^w /' -A' S'" <'?•' .^ .•?' .yr / .•!s»'~ .;?' / ^'(/ ^ y^ Sadanand S/o Late Neel kanth Dadsena aged 46 years, Occupafion Service "Choukidar" (Watchman),placed at Mand Store Kharsiya Electricity/ Engineerinj Light 8s Machinery Tube well 8s Gate Sub Division Raigarh District Raigrh (C.G). VERSUS RESPONDBNTS:- 1. State of . Chhattisgarh Through ' ./ %• fi ^''^"" ^ :S<<i"J?' Secretary Water Resources D.K.S Bhavan Raipur (C.G). 2. Executive Engineer Water Resources Division Raigarh (C.G-). 3. Executive Engineer Electricity /Engineering Light Machinery Tube well Division Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G). 4. Sub Divisional Officer Electricity /Engineering Light Machineiy Tube well Sub Division Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G). 5. Collector Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^rsvr-r^'v-s'- a sn^I W i<-<i+ •inian^ignN; i3' '3^ '*II<IIC1<1, ®-al'M<IS,f°«'1l'H'j,< ,,^,^,,^...........U-.fc..C&:>-^5'^ *11*4rtl t»i*<|e(»y 31^1'q^F ('i^A'l'i?) wiw ^ifta 3?i^i HOK'BLE JUSTICE J 16.07.2009 SIiri S.N.Nance. counsel Shri Ai'\"nd Dubev, P.L. f< .Challenge in the oresd 30.06.2009 (Annexure P/l) pas^ Contention oi eounsel ;or| ' a. eias's IV empioyee and ' is -\j submits that the resnondenf Nd .petitioiier. and if aGmmistra.ti'j|1 transferred oniy by respondent he was a daily wage empioyee a| reguiarized byt has been transfe|r On the other hand c&u) petitioner tias &een shittecl in ti'll is going to be caysed to the petij as the authority of respondent concemea, tne same can be aci whom the oetifioner can make the petitioner maxe a reoresenl same would be decided in a.ccord Accordingly, the petition oetitioner to n~;ake a representat period of fifteen days from the] eventuality of fiiing any such decided strictiy in accordancel ccnsictenng ali tlie gnevances oi ^il^^ 'RW^ff^ fs^ ^R'1-^K ^affira sii^i 'RITIISKER DIWAKER .51 zi.ls i3sxir.ioi-:.d> r the Sta.te. nt petition is to the oraer aatea fed by the resoondenr. No.2. the petitioner is that the oetkioner is ?orking under resocndent No.3. He .2 is not the authoritv to transfer the s exigency so requires, he can be No.3, He further submits that earlier ~id lust ten months back he has been Ted as a pumsnment. isel for the State subraits that the ; ^ame district and therefbre no harm tioner. He rurther submits that so far Mo.2 Sbr transierring the Detitroner is judicated by the respondent No. 1 tp 3. representation. He submits that let ition to the respondent No, 1 and the iance witn law. is disposed of with a direction to the :ion to the respondent No. 1 within a date of receipt of this order. In the •representation the same wouia &e with, iaw by the respondent No. 1 Ithe oetitioner. Sd/- Pnori^akrt iudge |iiB;»i