. mmJ‘g HERVE m? C ? E".omHizwwmwEmmcwm. ii; gi 3ai=annaa31nam%$; W . .“pr. Rev. No 7 ““E anna; §ZA§Q99m; 200 a€mim § a&w 2#/O7/2001 $hE1 Awadh Tripath applicant. Shri R.K. Jajodiya State; learned counsel for the la The applicant is a by the trial Court directi against the applicant unde Section 15(2)‘Gf the Freve From the challan papers it allegations are that the a Rs.27 lacs while from all- than Rs.1A lacs and odds. his income could not be mew , learned counsel for the ggrieved by the Order passed ng‘to frame the charges r Section 13(1)(e) read with ution of Corruption Act.- appears that the prOsecution )plicant had spent about :he sources available to him Learned counsel f0 before submission of the to him to explain his asse s, therefore, the charge could not be levelled against hi . the‘applicant submits that allan no Opportunity was given In the opinion of his Court this argument' cannot be allowed to stand because during the Course of trial’the applicarm shall . pesition and assets. The e entitled to explain his ev1sion petition is dismissegy/\\ SdL R.S. Garg Judge