1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30/06/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN Writ Petition (MD) No.7078 of 2011 A.Dominic ...Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner Integrated Child Development Scheme Commissionerate for Integrated Child Development Scheme Taramani, Chennai – 113. 2.The District Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Scheme Kanyakumari District,Nagercoil. 3.The Divisional Child Development Project Officer, Karungal, Paramananthapuram Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents herein to regularise the service of the petitioner in the post of Sweeper as per the guidelines issued by the government of Tamil Nadu in G.O.Ms.No.528 P & AR Department dated 10.10.1988 and in view of further clarification issued in Govt. Letter No.127293 P & AR Department dated 25.01.1989 with all service and monetary benefits, within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court. For petitioner ...Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For Respondents ...Mr.B.Pugalendhi Spl. Government Pleader O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing. 3. The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition for a mandamus directing the respondents herein to regularise the service of the petitioner in the post of Sweeper as per the guidelines issued by the government of Tamil Nadu in G.O.Ms.No.528 P & AR Department dated 10.10.1988 and in view of further clarification issued in Govt. Letter No.127293 P & AR Department dated 25.01.1989 with all service and monetary benefits. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. Seeking such relief, the petitioner has sent a representation and a proposal has been sent by the second respondent along with service particulars. However, the same has not been considered so far and hence, the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition for the relief stated earlier. 5. Considering the limited scope of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the claim made by the petitioner, I direct the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 13.04.2007 in the light of the proposal made by the second respondent on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. RR Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Commissioner Integrated Child Development Scheme Commissionerate for Integrated Child Development Scheme Taramani, Chennai – 113. 2.The District Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Scheme Kanyakumari District Nagercoil. 3.The Divisional Child Development Project Officer, Karungal, Paramananthapuram Kanyakumari District. +1 cc to Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu, Advocate SR.No.21066. W.P.(MD) No.7078 of 2011 Dated:30.06.2011 2P/5C RPB 13.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/