IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH JANUARY 2009 / 8TH MAGHA 1930 Crl.MC.No. 393 of 2009() ------------------------ CRIME NO. 267/07 OF KALIYAR POLICE STATION CC.252/2008 of JUDL. MAGI. OF FIRST CLASS-I (FOREST OFFENCES), THODUPUZHA .................... PETITIONER//ACCUSED: ---------------------------------- FIROZKHAN @ FIROZ, S/O. K.M. SHAMSUDHEEN AGED 29 YEARS, KALARIKKAL HOUSE NETTOOR P.O. MARADU, ERNAKULAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, REP. BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALIYAR POLILCE STATION IDUKKI DIST. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. P.A. SALIM THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C.No. 393 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of January, 2009 O R D E R Queried as to how the impugned order framing charge, which is a revisable order, is being challenged under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and not invoking the revisional jurisdiction, the learned counsel for the petitioner only prays that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this Crl.M.C. without prejudice to his right to challenge the impugned order by filing an appropriate revision petition. Request accepted. 2. This Crl.M.C. is dismissed as not pressed, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the impugned order in revision. Return copy of the impugned order to the learned counsel for the petitioner forthwith. (R. BASANT) Judge tm