1 Cri.A.264.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 264 OF 2010 [Priyadarshani Mahila Nagri Sahakari Bank Ltd. Vs. Sharda Shivaji Javare] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.M.S.Karad,Advocate holding for Shri.S.S.Thombre,Advocate for Applicant. Respondent is absent although served. .... CORAM: SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATE : 29TH APRIL, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 273 days, caused in filing accompanying Appeal. 3. For the reasons stated in the present application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. It also appears that the 2 Cri.A.264.10 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders said delay is not willful, deliberate and intentional, and hence, same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 5 In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause [B] thereof and delay of 273 days caused in filing accompanying Appeal stands condoned and present application is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- [SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J.] MTK