1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.961/2008 (Surajmal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : March 07, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Ramesh Purohit, for the petitioners. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the police investigation diary. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have been transporting the liquor under a valid permit issued by Competent Authority (Excise), Madhya Pradesh, by which the liquor was transported to Arunachal Pradesh from Madhya Pradesh i.e. Barwala, Indore, Ujjain, Ratlam, Mandsour, Durgapur, Shahjahpur, Gaziabad, Lacknow etc. Learned counsel has shown me a copy of the permit. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that a copy of permit is also available on record and this fact also appears from the order of the trial court. The petitioners have been transporting 2 the liquor under a valid permit. Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merit of the case and taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners Surajmal s/o Ghissa Ram, Suresh s/o Shyam Sunder and Devi Lal s/o Jagdish be released on bail in FIR No.75/2008, P.S. Pratapgarh provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-