IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44987 of 2009 LAL BABU DOM SON OF TODA DOM @ BATASA DOM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 6.5.2010 Supplementary affidavit filed today be kept on the record. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the first information report. Subsequently one eye witness examined in paragraph 22 of the case diary disclosed the name of the petitioner as one of the miscreants, who was seen committing the crime. Thereafter some other witnesses also disclosed certain material which connects the petitioner circumstantially with the present occurrence. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )