IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.9364 of 2008 Between: 1 N. Sankaraiah, S/o. Balaiah, Hindu, Ex Panchayat Sarpanch, Nizampet (V), Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 2 K. Narasimha Reddy, S/o. late Subhan Reddy, Hindu, R/o. 1-5/2, Nizampet (V), Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The A.P. Panchayat Raj Officer, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 3 The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Ranga Reddy (East) District, Near Nampally Railway Station, Hyderabad. 4 The District Panchayat Officer (FAC), Ranga Reddy District. 5 The Panchayat Regional Revenue Officer (PRRO), Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 6 The Village Secretary, Nizampet (V), Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to furnish details vide B/746/2007 dt. 13-12-2007 which is relating to the enquiry held on 13-12-2007 between 11.30 A.M. and 3.00 P.M. pertaining to the complaints and statements of villagers, observations and conclusions made by the presiding officer at the above enquiry as their action is being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.RAMANA ALLU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 3 to 6: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning the inaction of the respondents in furnishing the details of the enquiry conducted on 13.12.2007. It is the case of the petitioners that their village elder namely one Sri K.Janardhan Reddy lodged a complaint with the Divisional Panchayat Officer, Ranga Reddy (East) District-third respondent herein to conduct enquiry against the irregularities committed by the Panchayat Sarpanch of Nizampet Village. Pursuant to the said complaint, the third respondent conducted enquiry on 13.12.2007 in the presence of the Panchayat Regional Revenue Officer (PRRO),Qutbullapur Mandal-fifth respondent herein and the Village Secretary, Nizampet Village- sixth respondent herein and villagers. In the said enquiry, the third respondent found certain irregularities committed by the said Panchayat Sarpanch and recorded the same in the presence of the villagers. The grievance of the petitioners is that on 17.12.2007 they submitted a representation to the respondents to furnish all the details regarding the enquiry, under the Right to Information Act, 2005. But, so far no action has been taken by the respondents. Hence, this writ petition. In response to the writ allegations, the third respondent as well as the sixth respondent filed counter-affidavits. A perusal of the counter-affidavit filed by the third respondent and the letter, dated 29.06.2009, addressed by him to the second petitioner disclose that the enquiry report, dated 13.12.2007 and other papers, as sought by the petitioners, were already sent to the second petitioner under Registered Post on 29.06.2009 itself. In view of the above, no further orders need be passed in this writ petition and the same is accordingly closed. N.V.RAMANA,J Date: 07.07.2009 va