f^v^^ ;: •••;.. ^-... ^i fcli.: RF C^-^-ff'^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILAi £? LP.(S) No. ^ / 1 / ^e> .....^'" ..^y. ^s^^ '>--"\^0i'~ff^-' ^y .-••' s?'"' ..•'' s>- ^,° ^:^-- >USF S.N. Ti Govt. , Bloi (C.G. i, S?b. .Shri ri, aged about 42 years, as Assistant teacher, School - Retawand The Secretary Department School Education D.t (C.G.) ^-3. Block Education Officer, lock - Bastar, WRIT PETITION HI6M COURTOFCHHATTES6ARH AT KELASPUR W. P.fS^No. 919 of 2007 Petitioner : Sushil Kumur Tnwari Versus Respondents Stateof ChhattiqGu-h Aothers Singte Bench: Hon'ble Mr. JusticeSatidi K. Agmhotri. Mr. Sontosh Supta, Advocate for -the Petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panet Lawyer for -Hie State/respondwits. ORDER (Passed on Ihis 19th &oy of February, 2007) 1. Learned counsel oppearmg for the petitioner aibmtts Ihat the petitioner is working as Assistont Teacher in -the fiowrnnient Middte School-Retitwund, Block-Bastair, Oistrkt-Bostar. The petitioner obtcmed B. Ed. ExaniJnatfon certificorte on 23.(B.l994, on his own expenses. 2. Learned coimsel oCTienrmg for Ihe petitioner submi-ts that Ihe question nwohwd, herein asto whelttw the tencher, who obtahed B. Ed. Exflunhation Certificate on his otm expwises is enlftted to 'two advance increments. 3. According to leomed counsel for Ihe petitioner, Ihe petrtioner is entitled to two adwnice tocrements in view of the deci^on Of Ihis Court m -the case of Vashwant 16im€r Bh«rudNx»iVs. Muntc^wl Corporution. Ourg and anotlw {2006 QX) UPJft-Ce 9€}.This Court- m 1+ie case of Yashwient Kumar BtnradwnJ Vs. Afcinicyal Corportttion. '^) Durg and ano-ther (Supm), come to the conchiafon that 1fae teachers, t»hohad obtained B. Ed. /6.TX Examinatfon CerMficate en their own expeanses, are covered by •the circular deriied 24.12.W issued by •the State Sovemment of Machya ppaetesh. Leamed coun^l fpr Ihe petitionw furKier aiAnuts 'that Kw faets ond questipn of [aw hwolwd m the preaait caae ws sipjnrety covered by decision of •rtiis Courl' in 1+ie cnse of ya^u»ant Kuniar Bhan<h»<(j Vs. Murfc^al Corporatfon, Owg and tmothu" (Supni), to trfiich leamed counsel dppearhi9 fw •th®resporwlents fnh'ly concedes ond agrees with ttie uverment made by teamed counsel appeurmg fer •the petitioner. Accordnigly, •Hie (»rit(»titjonis allowed m terms ef Ite enter pasMed 'm Ihe case of yash«Kmt 16iin<r BlwruAwij Vs. Corporatlon. Durg and uwrtiu" (Si^>ro), subject to wertficuMon of Ihe fact as to whether Ihe petttwier hnsac^iired 8. Ed. Btam»witfon Certificatte on his own expenses as per the circularsdated 2442.1998 & 1.3.1999 and furtiier wihe-ther he has been paid 1w» advunce increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sabhesh