J: IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BHASPUR (CHHAinSGARHl W.P. (SlNo,^'2'^'^ /2011 (0 PETITIONER Prabhat Kumar Kaushik S/o. Late T.R. Kaushik, aged 57 years, working as Asstt. Grade - IIII Nagar Panchayat Sitapur Dist. Sarguja, (C.G.) --^ RESPONDENTS VERSUS (1)^ State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Transport Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) v ' ,? N\ >wyv ;.y >qwy i7A<^ >• JW^ Q?-' s-' ^ ^y €^y <?<;'; .s' (2) Secretary, General Administration, Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) (3)" Secretary, Urban Administration & Developinent Departinent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) (4) Cormnissioner, Urban AdministrattOn & Development Department, Directorate, Raipur (C.G.) u^ (5) Nagar Pa&ehayat Sitapur , Sarguja through its Chief Municipal OfBcer, Sitapur Distt. Sarguja(C.G.) (6) f Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Developinent Corporation, through its Managing Director, C.I.D.C., Shastri Chowk, Raipur (C.G.) ^ tf Divisional Maaager, Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Department, Divisional Office, Bilaspur(C.G.) / '. (8) Dy. Director, OfEce of Directorate, Urban Administrative and Development, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA [^run^cwri HIGH COURT OF CHHATTtSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S1 N0. 2377 of 2011 PETmONER : PrabhatKumarKaustiik RESPONDENTS VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WR1T PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTION OF SA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satjsh K. Aanihotri. J. Present: Shri P.S. Koshy and Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Governm;ent Advocate for the State. Shri Ratan Pusty, Advocate forthe respondents No. 6 and 7. (Passed on 61" day of May,2011) By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent aufhoritiestoconsiderthecaseofthepetitioneTforabsorRtionofsen/ice of the petitloner in Nagar Panehayat; Sitapur, District-Surgujato the post, of Assistant Grade-ili according to the decision taken by the State Government in respect of absorption of the employee of the erstwhiie Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation. - At the very outset, iearned counsei appearing for the parties fairly and jointly submit that the issue involved in this petition has aiready been considered and decided by this Court at length in O.P. Singh v. State of Chhatt'isgarh & Ofhers . Thus, thispetition may be disposed of in terms ofthe order passed bythis Court in O.P. Smoh (supra). In view ofthe aforesaid submission made by learned counsei for the parties, this petitiori is disposed of in terms pf O.P. Singh (supra). c^ SdA SaaishK.Agnihutri Judge ' W.P.(S)No.5521 of2010(^eeidedon21;01,'20Il)