IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. : 5452 of 2008. Decided on: 9th August, 2010. ____________________________________________________ Raksha Kaushal. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Yudhbir Singh, Advocate vice Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge(Oral): Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Assistant Advocate General has placed on record a copy of the enquiry report which was instituted against the petitioner for willful absence from duty. Mr. R.P. Singh informs the Court that in sequel to the inquiry report, the petitioner was dismissed from service. In view of this, the petitioner is now required to assail her dismissal order as per law. 2. Accordingly, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Disposed of as infructuous. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to assail her dismissal order in accordance with law before the appropriate Forum. It is made clear that the limitation will not come in the way of petitioner in view of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge 9th August, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.