IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 16.12.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.28564 of 2010 * Mrs.M.Rajam .... Petitioner ..Vs.. 1.The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai 2.The Tahsildar Polur taluk Polur, Thiruvannamalai District ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.11.2010 sent to respondents regarding the issuance of patta in respect of the property situate at No.111, Karuvimalai Village, Kalasapakkam Post, Polur Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District comprised in Survey No.160/66, measuring to an extent of 3 cents, which comes under, the classification of Natham Poromboke and issue patta to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.Prabudoss For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramanian (R1 and R2) Special Government Pleader O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 18.11.2010, on merits, within a specified period. 3. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 18.11.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the other persons concerned, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 18.11.2010, to the second respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar 4.1.2011 *Corrected as per the Order of this Court dated 22.1.2011 and made herein. Sd/- Asst.Registrar 31.1.2011 /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar arr To 1.The District Collector, |to be substituted to the Order Thiruvannamalai District, |already despatched on 20.1.2011 Thiruvannamalai | | 2.The Tahsildar Polur Taluk Polur, Thiruvannamalai District. 1 cc To Mr.Prabudoss, Advocate, *SR.4896 1 cc To The Government Pleader, SR.90398 Writ Petition No.28564 of 2010 ng(co) pmk.6.1.2011 Pmk.31.1.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/