THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM W.A.Nos.2034 & 2035 of 2004 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J) The subject matter of these two writ appeals is about the acceptance of the option given to the appellants to work either in the A.P.TRANSCO or in the APNPDCL. The appellants preferred the second option. The respondents however appear to be insisting on the appellants to work in A.P.TRANSCO. Out of the six appellants in W.P.No.2034 of 2004, five have already withdrawn and the writ appeal is pending with reference to only one appellant. In W.A.No.2035 of 2004, out of the five appellants, two have already withdrawn the writ appeal and it is pending with reference to three of them. After hearing learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondents, we are of the view that in the changed scenario, that emerged with the division of the State, the matter needs to be examined afresh. It is brought to the notice of this Court that though there were no vacancies in the APNPDCL, at the relevant point of time; due to large scale repatriation of the employees consequent on the division of the State, vacancies are available now. Therefore, we dispose of the writ appeals, leaving it open to the appellants to pursue the remedies with the concerned authorities in this behalf and the respondents shall consider the same in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. The miscellaneous petitions filed in these appeals shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J ______________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J Date: 24.07.2014 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM W.A.Nos.2034 & 2035 of 2004 Date: 24.07.2014 JSU