IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15985 of 2011 Vimal Choudhary @ Vimla Choudhary, W/O Anil Chaudhary, R/O Village-Mustafapur, P.O. Pawapuri, P.S.- Giriyak, Block - Giriyak, District – Nalanda. . . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The District Magistrate, Nalanda. 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Rajgir, District Nalanda. 4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Rajgir, District – Nalanda. 5. The Block Development Officer, Giriyak, District – Nalanda. 6. The Block Supply Officer, Giriyak, District – Nalanda. . . . . . Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2/ 15.10.2011 The petitioner, who is the licensee under the 1984 Unification Order as well as under the Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2001 prays for quashing the memo issued by the concerned authorities, directing refund of value of undistributed rice to the tune of 99.75 quintals under 50 % and 30 % of Sampurna Gramin Rojgar Yojana in between the years 2002 to 2006 at APL rate. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would either deposit 15% of the value of undistributed rice to the tune of 99.75 quintals at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within two months. This order would not come in the way of petitioner, if she wants to deposit the value of rice or rice itself in excess of 15%. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)