C.R.No.5177 of 2009 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.5177 of 2009.(O&M) Decided on: September 15, 2009. Karam Singh .. Petitioner VERSUS Union of India and others .. Respondents * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT NONE M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Miss. Application allowed. Vide impugned order dated 06.06.2009, the executing Court has dismissed the execution application on account of failure of the petitioner-decree holder to furnish the list of property. In this revision petition, it has been claimed that the counsel for the petitioner was not present in the Court on 06.06.2009, as he had inadvertently noticed the date of hearing as 17.07.2009 and after calling the case execution application was dismissed on the ground that the petitioner has not been able to comply with the order of the Court despite three opportunities. . . . 1 C.R.No.5177 of 2009 (O&M) As it is claimed that on account of mistake of the counsel the execution application has been dismissed, this revision petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file an application for restoration of execution application which is claimed to have been dismissed by wrongly marking the presence of the counsel for the petitioner. In case the application for restoration is filed with affidavit of the Advocate of the lower Court that he was not present on 06.06.2009, and the application has been dismissed by wrongly marking his presence, the trial Court will consider the same and if deemed appropriate restore the execution application by giving one opportunity to the petitioner to furnish the list of property, which is required to be submitted in the execution application. In case no such application is filed within a period of 15 days, this petition will be deemed to have been dismissed. Disposed of. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE September 15, 2009. rka . . . 2