IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3417 OF 1995 PETITION NO. 3417 OF 1995 PETITION NO. 3417 OF 1995 M/s. Gannon Dunkerley & Co.ltd.... Petitioner versus The Presiding Officer II Labour Court, Mumbai & ors...... Respondent. Shri R.V.Paranjape with S.D.Puri for the petitioner Ms. Jyostna N. Pandhi for Respondents 2(b) & 2(c). CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. A.P. DESHPANDE, J. A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; DATED; DATED; 13TH MARCH, 2007 13TH MARCH, 2007 13TH MARCH, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The petitioner and the respondent nos. 2(b) and 2(c) have resolved the dispute by entering into a compromise and the Consent Terms are filed on record. The same are taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for idntification. 2. A joint request is made by the learned counsel for the petitioner so also respondents 2(b) and 2(c) for disposal of the writ petition in consent terms. The respondents 2(b) and 2(c) are present in the court and they admit the consent terms to be true and correct. Hence petition is disposed of in the consent terms. 3. C.A. accordingly does not survive and hence diposed of. ......