IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(s.) No. WA éf /2009 PETITIONER: Prithwi Raj Patel S/o Shri Padum Lal Patel Aged about 50 years, Head Master, R/o at Post Jatari, Tahsil 8a District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh: Through The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) The Block Education Officer, Lailunga, District Raigarh (.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22 HE 6 OF T x CONSTITUTION OF INDIA C QO W200 7 ’m'm (Wu) mmf‘aaia? wmm mmm WWW $5€IW a: aimm : HR: JUSTICE ? 19.8.2009 Shri Somkant Vem'xa, coun ‘ 21 for the petitioner. Ms. 'Sunita Jain. PL. for the State. Counsel for the petitioner s bmits that number of identical petitions have been decided by this Court and the benefit of regular pay scale has been granted to‘the imilarly placed persons. In View 4 of this, at this stage, he wants to hdraw this petition with liberty to file representation before the respondent No.2. He however submits that in the eventuality o filing any such representation, direction may be issued for decidin the same expeditiously. Counsel for the state has n objection if the representation is made by the petitioner and the same is decided in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is smissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid libertyi In the eve tuality of filing any such representation by the petitioner be re the authority concerned, the same is expected to be decided exp ditiously. Pritinker Diwaker r Judge Sd/- R: t i