IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU C.R.P.NO.1704 OF 2010 Date:17.03.2011 Between:- Dr.Kranthilal Jain ..Petitioner/Respondent And Trishla Alekhya Jain and another .. Respondents/Petitioners ORDER:- This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 10- 06-2009 in I.A.No.1001 of 2008 in F.C.O.P.No.685 of 2006 on the file of Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad, whereunder and whereby, the petition filed by the respondents herein for payment of school fees of Rs.75,000/- was allowed directing the petitioner herein to pay the school fees of respondent No.1 herein of Rs.75,000/- for the academic year 2009-2010 and report compliance. 2. Respondents, who are minors, are represented by their mother, who is wife of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner filed income tax returns for the last five years to show that it is over burden on him to pay the education fees of both the children and that the mother of the respondents has sufficient means to educate both the children as the premises owned by the family members of the mother of the respondents was leased to Vasan Eye Care Hospital. Hence, he prays to set aside the impugned order. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents contended that the first respondent is studying Intermediate and the second respondent is studying X class, and that half of the expenditure for the school fees and other expenses is being met by the mother of the respondents and therefore, there is an obligation on the part of the petitioner, who is father of the children, to pay the remaining 50% of amount, and that the mother of respondents has nothing to do with the property of her parents and she is not getting any income of her own by way of rents, and hence, there are no grounds to interfere with the impugned order. 5. It is not in dispute before this Court that the first respondent is studying Intermediate and second respondent is studying X class in reputed institutions. The case of the respondents is that their mother was incurring 50% of the expenditure from out of her income for educating them. It is also not in dispute that the petitioner is also a Doctor and he filed income tax returns to show that his income is about Rs.3,00,000/-. Therefore, considering the fact that the children are at pre-graduate stage, the amount can be reduced from Rs.75,000/- to Rs.60,000/- per annum for both the children. However, this order will not preclude the respondents herein to file necessary application in case they incur more expenditure in future. 5. The Civil Revision Petition is partly allowed to the extent indicated above, by reducing the amount from Rs.75,000/- to Rs.60,000/- per annum. There shall be no order as to costs. _​_____________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 17th March, 2011 AMD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU C.R.P.NO.1704 OF 2010 Date:17.03.2011 AMD