IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 272 of 2002 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 30/01/2002 in WP NO : 1602 OF 2002 on the file of the High Court.) Between: M/s.Sri Krishna Wines,IL-24 New Madhavaram,Vontimitta Mandal Cuddapah Dist, Rep.by its Licencee Y. Krishna Reddy ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The Proh. & Excise Superintendent Cuddapah District Cudapah 2 The Commissioner of Proh & Excise Govt of A.P Hyderabad 3 Government of A.P Revenue Excise-III Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad rep.by its Prl.Secretary/Officer on Spl Duty 4 M/s.Sai Brothers Wines New Machavaram,Vontimitta Mandal Cuddapah Dist. Rep.by its Licencee P.Chandra Mohan Reddy .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.AMARNATH GOUD THODUPUNURI Counsel for the Respondents.: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO :272 of 2002 JUDGMENT: ( Per the Honourable Smt.Justice T.Meenakumari) When the matter was taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel for the appellant that nothing survives for adjudication in this appeal and thereby, the cause of action in this appeal has become infructuous. Recording the above submission, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. _______________________ Justice T.Meenakumari ____________________________ Justice Ramesh Ranganathan Dated: 25.9.2008 Nn/gurc. HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO :272 of 2002 (Judgment of the Division Bench delivered by the Honourable Smt.Justice T.Meenakumari) 25th September, 2008