IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CASE No.4472 of 2010 ==================================================== SHAMBHU KUMAR PANDEY, SON OF LATE SIYA LAL PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MALI NAGAR, CHAK MAISI, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR(BIHAR) Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI. 2. MR. K. VIJAY KUMAR, THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, C.R.P.F. NEW DELHI, C.G.O. COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI 110003. 3. MR. RAM KUMAR SAXENA, THE ADDL. D.I.G.P., C.R.P.F. GROUP CENTRE, MOKAMAGHAT, DISTRICT PATNA. ======== 03. 01.07.2011 Counsel for the Union of India states that against the order dated 19.4.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No.6527 of 2010, Annexure-2 for which this contempt petition has been filed, the authorities of the CRPF have preferred L.P.A. No.1996 of 2010 in which notice has been issued in the limitation matter. As the appeal against the order dated 19.4.2010 has been filed and is pending, may be to consider the limitation matter, I am not inclined to proceed with the contempt petition, which is, accordingly, disposed of directing the petitioner to appear in the aforesaid L.P.A. and to contest the same. Counsel for the Union of India has, however, undertaken that the authorities of the C.R.P.F. shall abide by the final order passed in the aforesaid L.P.A. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)