IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2657 of 2011 MD. SOHRAB @ CHHOTU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.4094 of 2011 MD. MONAJEER HASSAN @ GUDDU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 15.04.2011 Both the above stated petitions arise out of Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case no. 278/2010 registered under sections 25(i-b)a, 26,35,29 of the Arms Act and accordingly, above stated petitions are being disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioner in Cr. Misc. no. 2657/2011 was caught with 150 live cartridges whereas petitioner in Cr. Misc. no. 4094/2011 was caught along with three country made pistols and three empty magazines. Although learned counsels for the petitioners submit that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case at behest of their enemies who hail from the district of Nalanda and that is the reason all the seizure list witnesses belong to district Nalanda. It is also pointed out by them that the brother of petitioner in Cr. Misc. no. 4094/2011 has filed complaint case against the above stated persons as well as police officials. Taking into consideration the above stated facts as well as submissions of the parties, I do not feel it proper to release the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for bail stands rejected. However, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioners and if the trial of the petitioners is not concluded within four months from the date of receipt of this order, the petitioners may renew their prayer for bail. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)