.^ HIGHCQURT Ci-CHHArmSGAEH^A^ BILASHJR WRIT pE'rmoN ro No. 3071 of2009 PETmONER RESPQNDENTS Manq} Kumar Kcri. age 2P yi?a^s, S/o Shri Bhuldiaii Prasad Kori, By C^te Kori, By post Sfaiksha Karmi Grade III at Go^rt. Primary School Kachari, R^ village Barbaspur, Talmt Maaendragarh, Distt. Korea (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Througih th^ Secretory, Schedule Caste atid Sdiedul^ Tribe, Trib^l Welfare Department, D.K.8, Mantralay Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Union oflndia, ttirough the Secretary, Pemonal & Piiblic Grievaiices Lokiiayak BhawaAi^ Kliaii Maxket New Delhi. 3, State Level Caste S&rutmy Coiiiiiiiittee, Through its Director, State L^vel Oaste Scmtitiy Ccromittee, Ravwhatikar UtiiveNty Campus, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), 4. Sub Divisional Magistrate (Revemie) Manendragarh- District Korea (C.G.) 5. The Cliief Education CtfBc^* (C.E.O.) Janpad Panchayat Scmhath, District Korea (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARrnCLE 226 OF THE CONSTn'UTION QF WDIA SB: Hon'ble Slui Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Preserrt: Shri Prakash Tiwari, Advocate forthepetiticffi^r. Shri Alok Bakslii, Govenmiei-it Advocate forthe StaW respondents 1, 3 and 4 Shri XA.Lohaiii, Axivocate forfhe respandesltNo. 2. QRDERCORAL) (Passed on 01st day of My, 2009) Heard. 1. By this petition, the petitioner impu^s fhe order d^ed 11.12.2008 (Annexure P/l) whereby fhe Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) i.e. the respondent No, 4, without gomg into the basic requiranetite to tesye a c^ste certificate- has rejected the application of the petitioner for grant of oaste certificate. A State Lcvel Caste Scmtiny Committee has been constituted to verifv and look into disputes relatmg to the social status of the persons residmgwithinthetemtory ofthe State ofChhattisgarh. ,j^T^^, .-^i "% '.^/./ ^ Leamed counsel appearmg forthe respond^nts submitsthat ifthe petitioner is a^rieved, the petitioner may approaeh the respoadent Ne< 4 for considerationofhis case andto gethis socxal status verifiedL Shri Tiwari, leamed counsel appearing for the petifioiier sBbmite tiiat Ae petitioner is already m service and on account of refwal to issut cast^ certificate, the petitioner may be in difflculty and steps may be taken to remove the petitioner i5>om service and as such, durmg tho pendeacy ofthe application ofthe petitioxiCT before the respond^nt No, 4. some protectioti may be grantedto the petitioner. Leamed counsel appearmg for other side have no objection tffhe petition^ is protectedtill disposal ofthe application pending before the respondexrt No. 4. In view ofttie fbregoiiig, the petition is disposed with ^ direatice tte no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner by the reapondents till ttee disposal ofhis aqpplication for verification oflhe social statos ofttie petitioner by the State Level Caste Scrutiny Committee, subject to filing of a fr©sh application by the petitioner wifhia a period ofoneweek fro»today* Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge Amii