IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 4.2.2010 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.2003 of 2010 K.PRAKASH S/o A.Kandasamy, NO.1, ADHITHYA APARTMENTS, BHARATH PETROLIUM STAFF COLONY, NO.1, RANGANATHAN GARDEN, ANNA NAGAR, CHENNAI 40. .. PETITIONER .Vs. 1.THE MEMBER SECRETARY, C.M.D.A. NO.1, GANDHI IRWIN ROAD, EGMORE, CHENNAI 8. 2.THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PEERKANKARANAI TOWN PANCHAYAT, PEERKANKARANAI, CHENNAI 63. 3.MRS.ARUNAMBAL W/o Meenakshi Sundaram PLOT NO.13, NILE STREET, T.T.K. NAGAR, PEERKANKARANAI, CHENNAI 46. .. RESPONDENTS Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to inspect the Plot No.13 Nile street, T.T.K. Nagar, Chennai – 43, belonging to the 3rd respondent and initiate action for on going unauthorized construction as per law by considering petitioner's representation dated 11.11.2009. For petitioner : Mr.G.Justin For respondents: Mr.I.Paranthaman, (for R1) Mr.J.Rajakalifulla,G.P. (for R2) O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.Though the prayer sought for by the petitioner, in the present writ petition, is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 11.11.2009, is directed to be disposed of by the second respondent, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first and the second respondents, had no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 11.11.2009, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and to the third respondent, as well as to the other persons concerned, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5.The petitioner is directed to furnish to the second respondent a copy of the representation, dated 11.11.2009, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar lan/vs To 1.THE MEMBER SECRETARY, C.M.D.A. NO.1, GANDHI IRWIN ROAD, EGMORE, CHENNAI 8. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PEERKANKARANAI TOWN PANCHAYAT, PEERKANKARANAI, CHENNAI 63. 1 cc To Mr.J.Raja Kalifulla, Advocate, SR.6844 1 cc To Mr.I.Paranthaman, Advocate, SR.6709 Writ Petition No.2003 of 2010 BKY(CO) sra 12.02.2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/