IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14393 of 2009 SANTOSH RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 13.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in the order no.2 dated 19.3.2009 passed in Cr.Misc.no.2999 of 2009 it was ordered that one of the bailers shall be Deepak Kumar Singh but Deepak Kumar Singh did not agree to become bailer and as such, any other person may be ordered to be a bailer in place of Deepak Kumar Singh. This Court is of the view that it does not want to modify the order no.2 dated 19.3.2009 regarding change of the name of the bailer. As such, the order stands in tact as it was. This application for modification is dismissed. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI