1 1347.11-ao IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1347 OF 2011 Shri Nimuli Developers ... Appellant. V/s. Malati Balkrushna Katekar & anr. ... Respondents. Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Sr. Counsel with Ms. Yogita Deshmukh i/b. P.V.Thorat for the appellant. Mr. N.V. Walawalkar, Sr. Counsel i/b Jeetendra Sachdev for respondents CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATED : 14th December 2011. P.C. : It is informed by the respondent that the property in dispute has been transferred in favour of one M/s.Jai L.K. Planet Builders. The counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the appellant be permitted to implead the purchaser as well as CIDCO as parties to the suit and thereafter to pray for interim relief against the newly added parties as well as the defendants. Considering the developments taken place during the pendency of the suit, leave is granted to the appellant/plaintiff to tender an application for impleadment of M/s.Jai L.K.Planet Builders as well as CIDCO as party to the suit. After consideration of application for impleadment of 2 1347.11-ao parties, the trial Court may take into consideration the application for interim relief that would be tendered by the appellant/ plaintiff. The application that would be tendered by the plaintiff afresh shall be considered in accordance with the provisions of law and on its own merits without being influenced by any of the findings recorded by the trial Court in the order which is impugned before this Court. 2. With this direction, appeal from order stands disposed of. In view of disposal of appeal from order, pending civil application does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (R.M.BORDE, J.)