:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 776 OF 2000 IN SUIT NO. 422 OF 1998 Kisan Narayan Keni and anr. .....Plffs. vs. Mrs. Jeetu Alisher Khan and ors. .....Defnds. Mr.D.H. Mehta a/w. N.M. Shah Mr.D.H. Mehta a/w. N.M. Shah Mr.D.H. Mehta a/w. N.M. Shah for the plaintiffs. for the plaintiffs. for the plaintiffs. Mr.Chandrakant Chavan Mr.Chandrakant Chavan Mr.Chandrakant Chavan for defendant no.7. for defendant no.7. for defendant no.7. Mr. Laxman Thakkar i/b. S.P. Nagvekar Mr. Laxman Thakkar i/b. S.P. Nagvekar Mr. Laxman Thakkar i/b. S.P. Nagvekar for defendant no.5. for defendant no.5. for defendant no.5. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 9th September, 2005. P.C. :. 1. Learned counsel for the plaintiff tenders draft amendment. Amendment granted. Amendment to be carried out within one week from today. :2: 2. The plaintiff and the defendant no.7 has tendered consent terms dated 9.9.2005 duly signed by them and their advocates. Consent terms taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. There shall be decree in terms of the consent terms. Suit as against the other defendants stands dismissed. Undertaking given under the consent terms accepted. 3. In view of the disposal of the suit itself, Notice of Motion does not survive. The same is dismissed as infructious. Refund of court fees,if any, as per rules. SD/- **********