THE HON'BLE HIGH COURTOF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. S. N0. ^3,-^S^OF 2011 PETITIONER : Bhuneshwar Kaushik S/o Shri Ganesh Prasad Kaushik, aged about-50 years, R/o Sector 2, Ganga Nagar, Manlga, Tahsil 8& - Distt. Bilaspur (G-.-G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, School Education Department, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). 3. District Education Officer, Bilaspur ^ Distt.BUaspur (C.G.). \\^^ ..••' 4 Principal, - Govt. Higher Secondary •\'^y.--/y^ ^ School, Kunda,Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) ^''/^''^1" \4/°'_ \^/.^'^' .^f''\'\Q''~ 5. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts, ''•^(^' ^y' t^\^^ Pension, BilaspurDistt. Bilaspur (C.G.). PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner respectfully begs to subrnit as under:- 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER. As shown in the cause titl'e t >, . As showri ^n the cause title 3. PARTICULARS OF THE CAUSE/ORDER WHICH THE PETITION IS MADE: SUBJECT MArTER IN '. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) .P.(S)No. 6375 of 2011 Bhuneshwar Kaushik VERSUS State of Chhattisaarh and others it: Shri Santosh Bharat, counse! for the petitioner. Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, PL for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner Is entitted for benefit of two advance increments on account of he having passed B.Ed examination before his appointment at his own cost. It is submitted that the issue involved in the present petition is no !onger res integra and the same has been finaily decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of A-sha Saxena Vs. State of 2. It is further submitted that this Court has also taken a sfmltar view in its order dated 06.02.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No.6257/2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the order dated 29.04.2010 passed in Writ Appeat No.124/2009, wherein reiying upon the judgment.of the Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the order passed by this Court in anotherVA/rit Appeat No.87/2009, directions have been issued for consideration of the case for arant of two advance incremen.ts as per circular dated 21.09.1974 jssued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of the facts pleaded in petitioni ' 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that the case of the petitioner wou!d a!so be considered on the same !ines. 4. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to.the respondent authorities to decide the ciaim of the i;-lf;^7TFTJrT^' Q_- (^) Priya petitioner for grant of two advance increments as per cireular dated 21.09.1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of the facts pleaded In the petition within a period of eight weeks from today. 'w4^*u ' ludgP lllll llllfl-