.^^ ^ ^'/^w^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION^NO.^^3? /2006 ^$^ ^e^yy ^^/ ..••••^A?\^'" .<^yy- ^./" RESPONDENT8 r <€Cc§5^^. ^Ci>l"'--;s%?^ f/..^.^ -' X'^!' ^^/~ .^ p., _ V£-?.. ^•^^K'y ^-.?-;'' ••/-. ..<-" .^i~\l PETITIONER ^- Smt. Vina Tiwari, W/o. Hi.meshwar Prasad Tiwari, Aged about 42 years, Working as Assistant Teacher in Govemment Girls Prunary School, Janjgir, Development Block Nawagarh, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The District Education Officer, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). 3. ThePrmcipal, Govemment Girls Primary School, Janjgir, Development Block Nawagarh, District Janjgu'-Champa (C.G.) ,4. The CoUector, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE '226/227 OF-_J'HE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT/WRITS.ORDER/ORDERS.DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS IN NATURE OF WRITS OF MANDAMUS, CERTIQRARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. ./"- ^'^.^>^.^^ 20^: ^ ^. ^"o ' \<9' ^- s(5 .0 ^ ^w,ra- &" XI-HC-78 *11*IWI Sh<41<»> a^'.^fprRTtr, ^^'1(0, [sirtwy ^..t?.f...<l^/9.^. 200 3TI^?T 4a<o (licit^<!tS.ff) an^T^TfeN; (iwaii^istiKi'f ^^ ^' '^ gTgiWHfefan^T 17.8.2006 Shri Kiahore Bhaduri, Advoc^te for the petitioner'. Shri Satish 6upta, &y. <?ovt. Hear'd. The only ywvcmce roised b^ per Rctionalization Scheme, 2006 ^dv. for the State on advance copy. then oniy the junior most teacher-s ^re to be included in the surpius list and to be tr'ansferred cs per scheme. Wh^reos, in the present case, there ore many junior teachers to the petitiofler, |>ut their- names have not been inctuded in the iist ond the nome of the petitii^ner has been included in contravention of the scheme. Against th'is irr-eguiar-ity & il bound to consider the grievance correct according to the schema, cu'(d to corr'ect the some. Since the petitioner' hos ovailable, therefore, he shouid authority and the authority to cons With the direction aforesaict Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.3; Certified copy as per- rules. <hi<ilci41-t WRff ft te^t iRi<^ii ^;3ri^TT3n^T ^ the petitioner- in this petition is that os |n ease of surplus teachers in cny school, ^aality committed by the fespondents. the petitioner has the remedy to file a^ oppeal before the appel!ate authority os per- clsuse-7 of the rationalizcttic^i scheme and the appellate authority is ^if the petitioner', if the same is found equally efficocious alternative remedy ^ir-efer on oppeal before the appeilate jder the points raised by the petitioner'. The time taken by the peti')(oner in filing this petjtion till its disposal shail be condoned in pre-ferrmg the^ippeal before the appellote authority. , the petition stands disposed of. 66/06 also stands disposed .oj L.C. Bhadoo Judge E^/ yK