IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) N0. <5^o '7- / 2011 PETITIONER : Sanj'ay Kumar Jaiswal, S/o. Shri Ramsubhag Jaiswal, Aged about 25 years, R/o. ViUage Bedmi, Block/TahsU- Odgi, Distt. Surguja (C.G.j VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^^ v^v$£' ^•••••y ,..--\v .A'» 1. State of Chhatdsgarh Through - The Secretary, Departaient of Panchayat and Rural Developraent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur C.G.) 2. Chief Execution OfBcer, Janpad Panchayat, Odgi, Distt. Siirguja (C.G.) 3. Grain Panchayat, Bedmi, Through: Secretary, Vfflage Panchayat - Bedmi, Tahsil/Block- Odgi, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA an^awfette gi'nw^iwiw T ^ -S^ ^TiqRTq, ^TOI1S, f^TRTS? ...u....('....c§2..-?.e7Ar........ 311^1 Tt^Crtsi^T) SB : HON'BLE MR. 3USTICfi PRITINKER DIWAKER •^lRfspfN ^TO^ ii fe%t'!fsR?R ^•Sffim 315^1 14.12.2011 Shri A. N. Pandey, Adv^cate for the petitioner. Shri N. N. Roy, P.L. for^he state. Sliri Pandey fairly sub|nits that there exists an alternative remedy for the f(etitioner to file an appea! before the Collector and ther^fore he may be permitted to wfthdraw this petition wi^h liberty to approach the authority concemed. He, h<t;wever, submits that the appelfante authority may be directed to decide the appeal within time frame. Learned State counselj has no objection if the petitioner prefens an appeal ajnd the same is decided by the authority in accordance wjth law. Permission granted. | Accordingly the writ |3etitioq is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaifl liberty. Needles to say that in the eventuality of filin|g any such appeal by the petltioner, the same would bej decided by the concerned authority in accordance witl^ law as expeditiously as possible. Stl/- Pritinker Diwaker ie