IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 7TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 16TH KARTHIKA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3590 of 2008() ------------------------------ CRA.343/2006 of ADDL.DISTRICT &SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC-2), THRISSUR CC.384/2003 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, CHAVAKKAD .................... REVISION PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT:ACCUSED: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- C.A.BHARATHAN, S/O.AYYAPPU, CHAKKANDAN HOUSE, P.O.THRITHALLUR, VATANAPPALLY, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT SRI.RANJIT BABU RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. SURESH BABU, S/O.GOPALAN, VATHIYATH HOUSE, P.O.ENGANDIYUR, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, TRICHUR DISTRICT. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.M.NAZAR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J. =========================== Crl.R.P. NO. 3590 OF 2008 =========================== Dated this the 7th day of November,2008 ORDER Revision petitioner is the accused and second respondent the complainant in C.C.384/2003 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court,Chavakkad. Petitioner was convicted for the offence under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to simple imprisonment for three months and a compensation of Rs.31,500/-. Petitioner challenged the conviction and sentence before the Sessions Court, Thrissur in Crl.A.343/2006. Learned Sessions Judge confirmed the conviction but modified the sentence to imprisonment till rising of the court and a compensation of Rs.31,500/- and in default simple imprisonment for three months. 2. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that petitioner is not challenging the conviction or the modified sentence and petitioner CRRP 3590/2008 2 may be granted two months time to pay the fine. In view of the submission, revision is dismissed granting two months time to the revision petitioner to pay the fine. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE tpl/- M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. --------------------- W.P.(C).NO. /06 --------------------- JUDGMENT SEPTEMBER,2006