IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No.M-16089 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision : May 31, 2011. Binder Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.S.Toor, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in case FIR No.87 dated 29.7.2010, registered at Police Station Sadar Ghagga, District Patiala, under Sections 15, 25, 61, 85 of the NDPS Act and Sections 465, 468, 471 & 489 of IPC. As per the allegations contained in the FIR, the petitioner alongwith his co-accused was intercepted by the police when both of them were travelling in a car alongwith two parcels of poppy husk weighing commercial quantity. While the co-accused of the petitioner was caught hold by the police, the petitioner was alleged to have ran away. The petitioner has stated a long story to suggest his false implication. Crl.Misc.No.M-16089 of 2011 [2] Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find it a fit case to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. Suffice it to mention that the defence plea put-forth by the petitioner is a question of fact which shall be gone into by the Special Court at an appropriate stage. May 31, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE