^ COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fQ No. 7220 of2007 Ashish Paliwal, S/o Shri Teekam Chand Paliwal, Aged about 32 years, R/'o Mahesh Colony, Pulgaon Naka,Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) \ RESPON'DENTS . : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Food, Civi! Supplies & Consumer Protection Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bliawan, Raipur (CKliattisgarh) 2. Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahakari Vipanan Saagh Maiyadit, 880, Civil Lines, Mukliyalaya, Raipur (CUhattisgarh) Ihrou^i its Managing Director, Raipur (Cliliattisgarh) 3. Collector (Food) District Durg (Chhattisgarh) 4. Zila Vipanan Adliikari Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahakari Vipanan Sangh Maryadit, Durg (Chhattisgarh) WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmJnON OF WDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Asnihotri, J. Present: Shri Manindra Shrivastava, Senior Advocate with Shri Amit Venna, Advocate for the petitioiier. Shri Arvind Dubey.Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1 & 3. (Passed on 13U1 day of December, 2007) Leamed counsel appearins for the petitioner submits. that flie pstitioner is aegrieved by the fact that the petitioner has beea denied the beaefrts of circutar dated 31.10.2007 issued by the Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection tepartment and as such he is not eettmg the benefit of custom millmg system. »= He lurtfaer submits fhat the petitioner has submitted a representation to fhe Collector (Food) Durg, on 19.11.2007 (Annexure P/16). Despite all efforts, the Collector, Durg is proceeding with the agreements with other parties without deciding his representation. In the facts and circumstances of fhe case, it is expedient fhat the Collector, Durg be directed to consider and decide the rqaresentation dated 19.11.2007 (Armexure P/16) m accordance with law within a period of one week and the Colleetor shall pass a reasoned order on the issue. 3. In yiew ofthe foregoins, the petition stands disposed of. 2. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge Amit 't-- T[I t"'1?'' ('ET-~