IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. 44 of 2010. Decided on: 19th November, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Chander Kumar and Others. …Petitioners. -Versus- The State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. Praveen, Advocate vice Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge: There are three petitioners who have approached the learned erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, seeking their regularization. According to the petitioners, their cases were required to be considered as per law laid down by their Lordships of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya versus State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supplement (2) Supreme Court Cases 316. Learned Tribunal had ordered their regularization on the basis of the ratio of the law laid down in Mool Raj Upadhyaya’s case, however, subsequently the State has preferred a review petition bringing to the notice of the Court that in fact only Ashok Kumar had completed 240 days before 31.12.1993 and as far as Chander Kumar and Gagan Singh are concerned, they have completed 240 days from 1994 onwards. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. Consequently, the Court after going through the mandays-chart, recalled the judgment dated 11.04.2007 as far as Chander Kumar and Gagan Singh are concerned. Since Ashok Kumar was engaged before 31.12.1993, his case has rightly been decided by the learned Tribunal. 2. However, fact of the matter is that petitioners, namely, Chander Kumar and Gagan Singh were engaged in the year, 1994 and have completed 10 years’ continuous service with 240 days in each calendar in 2003. 3. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the cases of petitioners, namely Chander Kumar and Gagan Singh for regularization immediately after completion of 10 years continuous service with 240 days in each calendar year as per the policy framed by the State Government in 2000 with all consequential benefits, within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge November 19, 2010. (bhupender)