IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32672 of 2010 PASHUPATI NATH MANJHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 08.09.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 30.05.2010 in a case registered under Sections 18(c), 27 (b) (ii), 18 (a), 27 (a)of the Drugs and Cosmetic Act. It is alleged against the petitioner that one bottle of medicine was recovered by the police which bears no batch number, date of manufacturing hence it appeared to the informant to be spurious one. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is small medicine vendor and only one bottle does not bear the batch number and date of manufacturing for which petitioner can not be held liable. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has never been involved in similar nature of offence and the statement to that effect has been made in the petition. Learned counsel for the State submits that apparently the medicine appears to be 2 spurious one. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no verification or chemical examination of the seized medicine has been done as yet. Considering the nature of allegation, period under custody and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Siwan, in connection with Andar (MH Nagar) P.S. Case No. 55 of 2010. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)