IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19221 of 2010 SATENDRA KR. SINGH @ SATENDRA KR. S/O Late Wakil Rai @ Wakil Mahto, R/O Khemichak, P.S. Ramkrishna Nagar, District- Patna......................................................................................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR.....................................Opposite Party. 2. 27.05.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 27.01.2010 in connection with a case registered under Section 392 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that on the statement of the petitioner the alleged chain was recovered from possession of one Pradip Kumar. It submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that recovery has not been made from possession of the petitioner and in order to implicate the petitioner it has wrongly been recorded during investigation that on the statement of the petitioner recovery has been made from possession of Pradip Kumar. Apart from the present case the petitioner is involved in two other cases in which the petitioner is on bail. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner for the purposes of bail only, let the petitioner, Satendra Kr. Singh @ Satendra Kr., be 2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Patna, in connection with Kankarbagh P.S. Case No. 331 of 2009. If the petitioner fails to appear on two consecutive dates during trial the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)