WP(C) 5660/2006 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B K SHARMA Heard Mr. M R Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also Hear d Ms. P Chakraborthy, learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Deptt. The petitioner who appeared in the selection for appointmen t as Supervisor has filed this Writ petition claiming her supersession in the ma tter of appointment. According to the petitioner, she had occupied merit positio n at serial No. 15 but candidates below her have been appointed ignoring her cas e. In the Counter affidavit filed by the Respondents, it has been stated that out of 7 (seven ) Advertised vacancy, two vacancies were earma rked for BTAD area and in the remaining 5 (five) vacancies, appointments have b een made according to the merit position in the select list and also following t he reservation policy. It has been stated that since the petitioner did not come within the zone of consideration, she could not be appointed. The aforesaid stand of the Respondent has not been denied by the petitioner by filing any reply affidavit and thus the said stand cause r efuted. Consequently, no direction can be issued for appointment of the petition er. The writ petition is dismissed.