IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.239 of 2010 SUDAMA SONI @ SUDAMA KUMAR SONI,son of Suraj Seth,resident of village-Dhaudarh,P.S.- Sasaram(M),District-Rohtas. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 22-02-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This revision application has been filed against order dated 30.11.2009 passed in Cr.Appeal No.58 of 2009 by the learned Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram, by which he has dismissed the appeal confirming order dated 28-10-2009 passed by the Principal Member, Juvenile Justice Board, Rohtas in G.R.Case No.1346/2008, J.J.B.No.107 of 2009, whereby he had rejected the prayer for bail of the petitioner. I agree with the learned counsel for the petitioner that once material is found sufficient to allow a co-accused on bail will equally be taken for bail to a juvenile also. In the case one Mahendra Choudhary confessed his guilt before the police and named this petitioner also. Mahendra Choudhary has been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court vide Cr.Misc.No.30218 2009. Petitioner is also entitled for bail. Therefore, order dated 30-11-2009 passed by the learned Sessions Judge as well as order dated 28-10-2009 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board is set aside. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) with two 2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with J.J.B No.107 of 2009, arising out of Sasaram (Darigaon) P.S.Case No.458 of 2008. It is made clear that one of the bailors shall be father of the petitioner who shall undertake to keep the petitioner under his observation and shall produce him whenever is required by the Juvenile Justice Board. Accordingly, this revision application is allowed. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )