CWP(T) No. 14405/2008 23.11.2011 Present: Mr. A. K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. A. G. for the respondents- State It is the petitioner’s grievance that Sh. Satish Kumar, respondent No.6 was appointed on the recommendations of the Committee, in which respondent No.4, who is a relative of respondent No.6, had participated. The State has not clearly responded to this aspect of the matter. Factual aspect needs to be verified by the competent authority. As such, Mr. Gupta submits that petitioner shall approach the competent authority, bringing out all his grievances, within a period of four weeks from today. Upon receipt of the petitioner’s request, respondent No.5, Sub Divisional Officer(C), Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, shall look into the same and the competent authority shall take appropriate action in this regard. Needless to add, before taking any decision all concerned shall be heard. The order shall contain reasons which shall be furnished to the parties. The decision be taken within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment along with the petitioner’s request. With these observations, petition stands disposed off. November 23, 2011 ( Sanjay Karol ), (rana) Judge.