( 1 ) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Second Appeal No. 727 of 2007 With Civil Application Nos. 12787/2008, 12788/2008 and 12789/2008 (In Second Appeal No. 727 of 2007) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................. Mr. M.M. Bhokarikar, Advocate, for the appellant (Absent). Mr. A.I. Deshmukh, Advocate, for the respondent. .............................................................................. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 6TH MAY 2010 1. Mr. M.M. Bhokarikar, learned Counsel for the appellant, absent. Mr. A.I. Deshmukh, learned Counsel for the sole respondent, present. 2. The plaintiff, being aggrieved by the concurrent findings of both the courts, is in Second Appeal. ( 2 ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders 3. The theory of loan of Rs. 13,000/- propagated by the plaintiff, on evaluation of evidence, is not accepted by both the courts. 4. The Second Appeal sans merit and it is accordingly dismissed. Consequently, the Civil Applications are also disposed of, as they do not survive, in view of dismissal of the appeal. ( K.U. CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bgp/sa727