- 1 - 14.ss.1760.10 skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1760 OF 2010 Nitesh Hirachand Jain Prof. Of R.P.Sanghvi ..Plaintiff -Versus- Sudhakar B. Sable & Anr. ..Defendants .......... Ms.Nita Solanki i/b Kiran Jain & Co. for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. .......... CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 21ST SEPTEMBER 2011. P.C. 1 The suit as against defendant no.1 is allowed to be withdrawn. 2 The summary suit is based on the demand promissory note. 3 There was no reply to the plaintiff’s advocates’ notice dated 5th March 2010 demanding payment. The plaintiff has filed the compilation of documents, which is taken on record and marked ‘A’ collectively. 3 The defendants are absent, The defendant have not filed an appearance. There is nothing on record that militates against the plaintiff’s claim. - 2 - 14.ss.1760.10 4 In the circumstances, the summary suit is decreed as prayed. However, the interest after the date of filing of the suit shall be at the rate of 12% per annum. Costs to be quantified as per rules. Refund of court fees, if any, as per rules. -