IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 1643 of 2003. Date of Decision: 25th March, 2009. Jawahar Lal. Ice Factory Petiitioner through Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate Versus Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. ...Respondent through Mr. Suveer Sheokand, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) This Revision Petition has been filed against the orders dated 1.10.1999 and 5.2.2003 passed by the trial Court and the learned Additional District Judge, Faridabad respectively, on an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC. In the Civil Suit, the petitioner has challenged the demand of Rs.6,88,775/- raised by the respondent Corporation. While issuing notice of motion vide order dated 3.4.2003, this Court stayed disconnection of the electricity supply of the petitioner after taking notice of the fact that the petitioner has already deposited a sum of Rs.2,75,000/-. The afore-stated interim order is operating from last about six years. Though the suit is stated to be still pending, however, the proceedings have been substantially completed. In these circumstances, when both the parties have reconciled with the interim order, I do not deem it necessary to go into the rival contentions and rather dispose of this revision petition with a direction to the learned Civil Court to expedite and decide the civil suit within a period of six months. Till then the interim order dated 3.4.2003 passed by this Court shall continue to operate. Disposed of. March 25, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE