1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No.944 of 2008 In Income Tax Appeal Stamp No.345 of 2008 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for Applicant/Appellant. Shri A.A. Naik, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : A.M. Khanwilkar & R.C. Chavan, JJ. DATE : 6th June, 2008 1. Counsel for the respondent points out that the appeal itself is not maintainable. That question will be considered at the appropriate stage. For the time being, in the interest of justice, we are inclined to condone delay of 67 days in preferring appeal, as sufficient cause is made out in the application. 2. Application is allowed. Delay is condoned. JUDGE JUDGE pdl