IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL MCC No. 353 of 2009 in Writ Petition No. 553 of 2009 (MS) Ajit Singh Bhola …... Petitioner Versus Smt. Poonam Chadha and others …… Respondents …….. Mr. T.S. Bindra, Advocate for the review petitioners. Mr. V.K.Kohli, Senior Advocate with Mr. I.P.Kohli, Advocate for the opp.party (petitioner) Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. After arguing for a while, Mr. T.S.Bindra, learned counsel for the review petitioners, seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the review petitioners/plaintiffs to lead rebuttal evidence in the suit after the closure of the evidence of the defendants. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is observed and directed that after the evidence of the defendants in the suit is over, the petitioners/plaintiffs shall be at liberty to produce rebuttal evidence. This, however, is subject to the directions contained in the Court Order dated 16.04.2009 with respect to the expeditious disposal of the suit and the specific direction that the suit has to be disposed of by or before 30th June, 2009. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 04.06.2009 A