IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2113 of 2006 DAYANAND JHA, S/O LATE SITA RAM JHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DULLIPATTI, P.S. JAYANAGAR, DISTRICT- MADHUBANI……………………………………..PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR REPRESENTED THJROUGH SHRI AMIR SUBAHANI, COMMISSIONER-CUM- SECRETARY, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 2. SHRI HARIBANSH NARAYAN, DIRECTOR, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 3. DR. JAWAHAR RAM, REGIONAL DIRECTOR, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, DARBHANGA RANGE,DARBHANGA. ………………………………………………OPP. PARTIES ----------- 6 08-09-2010 Heard the parties. According to the opposite parties the consequential benefits by way of salary etc. have already been paid to the petitioner. On behalf of petitioner also it is admitted that he has been paid an amount of Rs.4,78,284/- only by way of consequential benefitS. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the consequential benefits have not been paid in full and petitioner is not satisfied with the amount and the calculation. Considering the nature of the order passed and the stand of the State, this court is satisfied that no case is made out for proceeding against the opposite parties in contempt. This application is, therefore finally disposed of. It goes without saying that if the petitioner is not 2 satisfied with the calculation and quantum of consequential benefits, he would be at liberty to file representation or pursue his remedy through appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)