^. Siut. Rikta Paul aged about 45 years, W/o Late Shri T.K. paul, Resident of Old CoUege Cami Chhota Bazar Cbirmiri (C. 0.1 State of ClAattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Departaieat of School Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) The District Education Ofiicer, Korea, District Korea (C.G.) AdEainistra.tor tlirough Principal, Laluri Multipurpose, Higher Secondary School, Chirmiri, District -Korea(C.G.) The Director, Dh-ectorate, PubUc Institution, Pension Bada, Raipur, (C.G.) Shri R.K. Jaiswal, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Suniit Venna, Paael Lawyer for fhe State oa copy. 12.11.30071 Heard on adinission. Leamed counsel for the petitioaer argues fhat fhe husband of tiie petitioner was a goverrunent servaat and he was entifled to receive benefit of recominendatioii of 5th Pay ComTnission at par wifh the counter part iu the Goveniment Institution. It is subnutted fhat fhe benefits of 5tfl Pay Commission was to be grauted witli effect froua 1.1.1996 ia acconlaace \vifh tb.e Madhya Pradesh Revision of Pay Rules, 1998. He further submits that inaay petitions have been filed in this regard and fhey have beeu disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to malce representation before tlie concemed autliorities and fhe said authorities have been directed to consider the i^presentation. However in fhose i»|j!j»»-l,3<B.a-;;l.:-;.(!.SK;.;.-;,»: W.P. (S) No. 6358/2007 cases the petitioners were govenunent servauts but in this case fhe petitioner is vrife of the deceased, who was a goveminent servaiit. He also subinits that fhis Court by judginent aad order dated 6.2.2007 in case of Smt. A. LaU Vs. State of Chliattisgarh and ofher comiected matters (W.P. No. 4108 of 2005) held fhat fhe teachers worldng in fhe Govenunent Aided Scliools are entitled to the benefit of recominendation of ttie 5th Pay Coirunission. The petitioner has claimed for saoae relief. He prays for giviag Uberty to the petitioner to file a representation before fhe concemed Accorditigly, this petitiou is disposed ofwith a direction fhat if so advised, the petitioner niay file representation before the concemed authorities witbin a period of 3 weeks froni today along \vifh copy of fhis order and copy of order passed ia W.P. No. 4108/2005 and if such a representation is filed fhat shall be decided on its own raerit in accordance witih. law in light of fhe judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 passed by fhis Court in fhe inatter of Sint. A. LaU Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and other coruiected raatters (Supra). The petition is accordiD^gly disposed of. No orders as to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge : vatti