IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 62 of 2010 Dr. Deepak Bhandari & others …Petitioners. Versus Public Service Commission and another …Respondents. Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, Advocate for the petitioners. Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J, (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that there are a number of technical defects in the instant writ petition, and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action by removing the technical defects. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforementioned. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 22.4.2010 Avneet