1 wp-8954.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8954 OF 2010 Mr.Deepak B. Wayangankar and others. ... Petitioners. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents. Kapil Shetye for the petitioners. S.N.Patil, AGP for respondent No.1. Rakesh Bhatkar for respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATED : 2nd February 2011. P.C. : The learned counsel appearing for the respondent­ Bank brought to our notice that the statement relating to the payment of salary for every month mentioned in the order dated 20th January, 2010 was not a statement made by his client but was a direction of this Court. He appears to be right. 2. In the above circumstances, the portions reading as “The statement made by the Bank” and “is taken on record” be deleted retaining remaining part reading as “that the salary of the employees would be paid every month”. Rest of the order shall remain as it is. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)