IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30198 of 2009 AJAY SINGH @ AJAY KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 9 16.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Ornaments of the complainant is taken by this petitioner in collusion with accused no.3. Rs. 50,000/- was demanded is paid. So nothing remained for ill-treatment to the complainant and attempt was made by this Court to reconcile differences between wife and husband. The complainant went to her matrimonial house, never appeared in this Court earlier. She is present in Court with her father who took her from her matrimonial house. There is claim and counter claim that she never accompanied her husband and her grievance is that she was not taken by her husband, may be reality in both but her father is allowed to take his daughter from her matrimonial house, goes to show that differences are otherwise, not justifying refusal of anticipatory bail. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above 2 named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Complaint Case No. 2032/2007, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)