1 Appln 2937-10 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2937 OF 2010 Mohammed Hanif Abdulkarim Shaikh .Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors .Respondents Mr.S.V.Marwadi i/b.Mr.V.V.Katti, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.Geeta Mulyekar, APP, for Respondent No.1  State Mr.A.M.Saraogi, Advocate, for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 23RD AUGUST, 2010 P.C. . This is an Application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted by the learned Judge, Additional Sessions Court, Greater Bombay dated 7th May, 2010 to the Respondent - Sanjay Panchal, who had sold a Innova car bearing No.MH-15-B N-6432 which belongs to some one else, taken a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- + Rs.21,232 x 2 + Rs.50,000/- by a cheque. The car was stolen from the custody 2 Appln 2937-10 of the Complainant. The allegation is that after this Car was stolen and after statement of the Respondent was recorded by Lonavala police, the Respondent encashed the cheques. The Respondent seems to be dealer of cars, who runs business by name Panchal Motors. The learned Judge could have refused anticipatory bail granted to the Respondent saying that money which the Respondent had received was to be recovered. Instead of that he chose to grant anticipatory bail to the Respondent observing that custodial interrogation was not necessary. It cannot be said that he was totally wrong in granting anticipatory bail. 2. In view of this, no case for cancellation of anticipatory bail is made out. Application is rejected. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)