HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L. NAGESWARA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2204 OF 2011 O R D E R: Notice has been ordered to the other side but not returned. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the revision is filed against the order in E.P.No.64 of 2011 in O.S.No.162 of 2007 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tenali, Guntur District, where-under the properties that were sought to be sold in execution of the decree. 2. Evidently, the properties were attached even before the judgment and the decree was passed on 24.02.2011 and on the same day, the attachment was made absolute. So far as the order of the lower Court is concerned, it does not suffer from any infirmity since when the property was attached in July, 2007 no objection was raised and no security was also given. But, however, when the E.P., was filed for realisation of the decretal debt the said attachment is being challenged. I do not find any merits to challenge the attachment. But, however, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner represents that further proceeding with execution, the petitioner is prepared to discharge the decretal debt within 3 or 4 instalments and therefore, a direction may be given. 3. Therefore, in view of the above submission, the petitioner is permitted to pay the decretal debt in four instalments and the 1st instalment of Rs.50,000/- shall be paid within one month and the 2nd instalment of Rs.50,000/- shall be paid within one month thereafter and the balance shall be paid subsequently within two instalments. Accordingly, Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. Till the period of completion of four instalments further steps in the execution petition may be deferred by the lower Court after payment of the 1st instalment. No costs. _________________________ N.R.L. NAGESWARA RAO, J Date: 01.08.2011. INL