1 C.S.No.908 of 2000 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. This is a suit pertaining to the year, 2000. After the constitution of this Commercial Division with effect from 01.01.2018, the suit was transferred to the Commercial Division and is listed today for determination of jurisdiction. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff would submit that the present dispute arise out of passing off of the Trademark of the Plaintiff by the defendant and said dispute squarely comes under the definition of 'Commercial Dispute' under Section 2(1)(c)(xvii) of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015, which reads as follows:- “intellectual property rights relating to registered and unregistered trademarks, copyright, patent, design, domain names, geographical indications and semiconductor integrated circuits” 3. This Court, on perusal of the plaint and in the light of the aforesaid submission made, is of the view that the present dispute comes within the meaning of Section 2(1)(c)(xvii) of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015. Hence, this Court assumes jurisdiction to hear the suit. Accordingly, the suit is taken on file. http://www.judis.nic.in 2 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. arr 4. Mr.Anand Dasgupta, the learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiff submitted that they have given the change of vakalat. Mr.K.Premchandar, learned counsel entered appearance on behalf of the plaintiff. Hence, the Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.K.Premchandar, as learned counsel for the Plaintiff and post on 06.08.2019. 5. There is no representation on behalf of the defendant. Hence, the Registry is directed to print the name of the defendant as well. Post on 06.08.2019, for filing draft issues. 23.07.2019 arr C.S.No.908 of 2002 http://www.judis.nic.in