IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11411 of 2010 RAJDEO RAI, S/o Ayodhya Yadav, R/o village Ashok Chak, P.S. S.K.Nagar, District Patna ………. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …. Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Sushil Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, A.P.P. 2 26.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been named in the first information report only on the basis of the statement made by co- accused Dharmendra Kumar from whose possession the stolen motorcycle has been recovered. It is submitted that the petitioner’s antecedent is clean and there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, RAJDEO RAI, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of 2 Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 47 of 2010, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be his father. If, after his release in this case, the petitioner is again found implicated in similar nature of cases, then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)