1 5 S.B. CIVIL WRIT CONTEMPT PETITION No.292/2007 IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1502/2005 [SHOJI RAM MALI VS. SHRI MATI LAL JAIN] Dated : 10.03.2008 HON'BLE MR. MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, J. Mr.R.S.Saluja for the petitioner. Mr.Kamlesh Rawal for Mr.K.L.Mathur AAG for the respondent. ***** By way of this contempt petition, the contempt petitioner has alleged that the judgment of this Court dated 12.10.2006 has not been complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that pursuant to the judgment aforesaid, the respondents have passed an order on 11.06.2007 providing benefit of 3rd Selection Scale w.e.f. 01.09.1997 instead of 01.01.1998. The dispute now raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is only in regard to the pay scale. Inasmuch as according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, petitioner was entitled for higher pay scale on completion of 27 years of service, but a lower pay scale has been given by the respondents. Perusal of the judgment does not show that any direction has been given by this Court to allow the particular pay scale to the petitioner, rather the contents of the judgment shows that dispute raised by the petitioner was only in regard to the date of admissibility of the benefit of 3rd Selection Scale i.e. as to whether it is to be given from 01.09.1997 or w.e.f. 01.01.1998. This Court directed to the respondents to 2 provide benefit of 3rd Selection Scale to the petitioner w.e.f. 01.09.1997 which otherwise has now been given by the respondents vide their order dated 11.06.2007. Thus in view of the above, in my opinion, no contempt is made out. However, while dismissing the contempt petition , the petitioner is given liberty to other remedies if at all he has aggrieved by the action of the respondents regarding grant of particular pay scale. So far as the contempt petition is concerned, the same is dismissed. Notices are discharged. (MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI), J. mamta