IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.12987 of 2009 Date of Decision: August 25, 2009 Harinder Pal Singh & Others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. R.K. Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) In this petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, prayer is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for granting benefits to the petitioners in terms of judgment dated 21.7.2008 (Annexure P-1) rendered by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.15554 of 2007 whereby Circular dated 29.7.2003 (Annexure P-6) allowing commutation of pension to the petitioners at reduced rate has been quashed. Directions have been issued to restore commutation of pension to the petitioners at reduced rate in accordance with revised table CWP No.12987 of 2009 [2] issued as per Circular dated 31.10.2006. Learned counsel states that the matter would be covered by decision dated 6.7.2009 of this Court rendered in Civil Writ Petition No.9652 of 2009 titled ‘Bishan Singh & Others vs. The State of Punjab & Others’. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Heard. It is not in dispute that issue raised in this petition is covered by decision rendered in Bishan Singh’s case (supra), in which reliance was placed on Order dated 30.3.2009 passed in Civil Writ Petition No.7446 of 2008 titled `Sohan Singh vs. State of Punjab & Another’. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of in the same terms as Order dated 30.3.2009 passed in Civil Writ Petition No.7446 of 2008 titled `Sohan Singh vs. State of Punjab & Another’. (AJAI LAMBA) August 25, 2009 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?