39> ‘ujvuoo WW @W ' $a1‘taua11éw Aaaeaant J F3aiz$i§f Resyanégn$s1 Be§a§ém§is Heard. {Second Kioneai i gingie Eemeb : Eca’ble Shai D95 35-!E3-2m39 “hm Raja Shanna: counse. Shri Shashallk Thakur: Pa ‘Q[ 0° 1x mm V Ramlal“ 50 vrs. Mohail. 53 Vrs 80f}: S/Q namarva Qa‘mm Elli Tarainga, Kayuakal Penna, ‘ah. Bliata§a§a,Distt ”Minn Versus- Mangalchand., 45 E‘v’iaimiiamas Satnami Budharabai, 52' yrs, DswardaS Samami Taturam, 22 yrs, Sjo DewardaS Sataamé Budhiyardas, 2O yrs, Dsiwardas $amami SarHmnbai, 55 yrs Lakhan, 35 yrs Lachchanbai, 32 yrs. Chandaabai, (36 yrs. ‘5 to '7 Child of 8a 8 Suku Samaria? 1 t0 8 R/o Viil. Taram’ga,Teh. Bhatapara‘, Distt. Raipur Stais cf (1G. 8V Coikctor, Raipur .I/s. 3,00 ofthe ORG} irendra Mishra. J3 vrs 1&19 y Wci,’ o 43 W61] o Late for thi: appellants nal Lawysr for the Stats. mmmm i mm<m) mmm maimed counsel for thE apgnellemts orally prays that he may be pesmnifted to Withdraw this appeal1 with Eber’ry to {116 fmsh appeal by th€ legal reprasentativw of appaihln No. l—Ramial; 3S 6 days beforc the dam 0f filaing of the appéa}, he had <§ied. Smce the fact of ciaath of Ramlal couki not bo communicated to tho counsel appoarmg for tho aposilemtS, the above appeal has been iiled. The appéllants aro pannittevg to withdraw this apyeal with iibomr to foo fros‘n appealas yrayed for‘ Learned couned for the bppeQants prays for retma of the certified copy of the impugned jm‘igmem and (Eecree annexed wifh this appeal, Prayer is ailewecL On appeliants’ thmishing authenticated copyeof the imyugned judgment alld decree, the certjflet‘ cogf of the impugneo jmigment 'ami decree be rehmed to counsel ior {he appeHants. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge 4m , f/