IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY THE SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ELIPE DHARMA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 14489 of 2005 Between: M./s Sathyam Associates rep by its Managing Partner, P.Ramakrishna Reddy, S.Nos: 532 and 534. 2/and 3 of Gudipalliapdu-II, Kodurupadu Gram Panchayat, Kothakalva Kodurupadu Road, in Mypadu Road Opp to circar Paper Mills Ltd., Kodurupadu Nellore, Rurals R/o.Nellore. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Collector and District Magistrate, Nellore District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Nellore District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer Nellore. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representations dt.21.12.2002 and 16.5.2005 in terms of GO Ms.No.252 Revenue (Asn.I) Department, dt.9.4.1998, and GO Ms No.712 Revenue (Asn.I) Department, dt.20.6.2003 and pass appropriate orders there on by issuing a wring order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.RAMA GOPAL Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court at the admission stage made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representations made by the petitioners dated 21.12.2002 and 16.05.2005 in terms of G.O.Ms.No.252 Revenue (Asn-I) Department, dated 9.4.1998 and G.O.Ms.No.712 Revenue (Asn-I) Department, dated 20.06.2003. The petitioner is a partnership firm and it owns an extent of Ac.7.80 cts in S.No.532, 534/2 &3 of Gudipallypadu-II, Kodurupadu Gram Panchayat, Nellore Rural. After obtaining necessary permissions from the concerned officials and also borrowing some amount from the banks towards working capital, the petitioner firm established a small scale industry. It is stated that the petitioner was informed by the revenue officials that the land purchased by it was the assigned land and upon the said information, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 21.12.2002 to the 1st respondent requesting to assign the land purchased by it in its favour in pursuance of various Government orders. On the said application, the petitioner firm was directed to appear before the 2nd respondent on 18.01.2003 for the purpose of enquiry and accordingly the petitioner firm appeared. Contending that no orders have been passed so far in spite of several reminders, the present writ petition is filed. Heard and perused the material available on record. On considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to direct the 1st respondent to consider the representations made by the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to dispose of the representations made by the petitioner dated 21.12.2002 and 16.05.2005 and pass appropriate orders within a period of eight weeks from today, after hearing the petitioner. No costs. ________________________ (ELIPE DHARMA RAO, J) Dated:06.07.2005 MRKR To 1. The Collector and District Magistrate, Nellore District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Nellore District. 3. The Mandal Revenue Officer Nellore. 4. Two C.Cs to the government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. 5. Two C.D.copies. ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MPL}