1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 699 of 2008 [Harikeshav Shriramji Gadwhe Vs. State of Mah. & another] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. P.A. Teni, Adv., holding for Ms. Priti Rane, Adv. [appointed] for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Fulzele, APP for respondents. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 04th March, 2009. 1. In our order dated 6th January, 2009, we had to express if petitioner makes out a case for a premature release considering a special work done by him, the Govt., should consider it. 2. Learned APP seeks liberty to place on record in this petition instructions received by him, through a FAX which is a letter dated 18th February, 2009. Copy of the letter is tendered before us. We have perused the same. 3. It is seen that the Govt., has considered the matter, and it is pointed out therein that the work done by the petitioner was done jointly with many other prisoners, for which he was remunerated according to Rules. 2 4. Whatever the petitioner claimed to have done as a matter distinction cannot be considered in isolation and in contrast with rest of the prisoners who had also joined hands for the said work. 5. In these premises, the petition filed by the petitioner for his early release work having done a special work, which is considered by the Govt. within its Executive powers, does not call for any interference at the hands of this Court. 6. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. 7. This order be communicated to the prisoner through the Superintendent of Jail concerned. 8. Copy of this order be furnished to learned APP free of cost for communication. Judge Judge |Hedau|