IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CWP 12037 of 2011 Date of Decision:18.11.2011 Shri Sanatan Dharam Girls College, Bathinda . . .Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others . . . Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. ***** 1. Whether reports of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment: 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Sanjiv Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Vipul Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.3. ***** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) 1. The official respondents as well as respondent No.3 have filed their replies/affidavits, which are taken on record. 2. As per the averments made by the official respondents, the requisite grant in aid has been released to the petitioner-College w.e.f. 01.01.2006 except the arrears of salary, which shall be released as and when sanction is received. 3. In view of the fact that substantial relief has been granted, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the official respondents to take appropriate decision regarding payment of arrears of revised salary w.e.f. 01.01.2006 as early as possible and preferably within four months form the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (SURYA KANT) NOVEMBER 18, 2011 JUDGE ‘raj’