Civil Revision No. 5792 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 5792 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 07.11.2011 Ashok Kumar and others ....Petitioners Vs. Ramniwas and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present:- Mr. P.R. Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioners Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) This petition assails the order dated 17.09.2011 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mahendergarh, allowing the application filed by the plaintiff-respondent No.1 (hereinafter referred as 'the plaintiff') for providing police help. The plaintiff sought injunction against the defendants- petitioners (hereinafter referred as 'the defendants') for not interfering in the ownership and possession of the house, shown as EFGH in green colour as well as the passage, shown in the site plan, situated in Killa No.15//20/1 in the area of village Beri, Tehsil and District Mahendergarh. The trial Court, vide order dated 05.07.2010, directed the parties to maintain status quo regarding possession and construction in the disputed land. Civil Revision No. 5792 of 2011 (O&M) 2 Thereafter, the plaintiff moved an application that despite the order of status qua regarding possession and construction, the defendants were creating obstructions in the passage. Learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that plaintiff, though has claimed passage in Killa No. 15//20/1, yet under the garb of such plea, he claims passage over Killa No. 15//20/2 and pass through it. Having heard rival contentions, both the parties concede that the passage is on the eastern side of Killa No. 15//20/1. As such, in order to ascertain the existence of the passage, as mentioned in the plaint, demarcation of the same and appointment of Local Commissioner has become essential. In this view of the matter, this petition is accepted; the impugned order is set aside and the trial Court is directed to appoint a Local Commissioner (a revenue Officer not less than the rank of Tehsildar), who would demarcate the suit property with the help of relevant revenue record and make a report, as to where the passage, as claimed by the plaintiff comprised in Killa No.15//20/1, exists. The trial Court would complete this exercise within one month and modify the order of status quo, passed by it, in accordance with law. (A.N.JINDAL) November 07, 2011 JUDGE ajp