IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20519 of 2011 1. Ram Pravesh Kuar, S/O Sukhdev Kuar, 2. Laxman Kuar, S/O Sukhdev Kuar, 3. Veena Devi, W/O Laxman Kuar, 4. Mirtyunjay Kuar, S/O Ram Pravesh Kuar, All are R/O Vill- Masha, P.S.- Shyampur Bhattha, Distt- Sheohar. …… Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar ….. Opp. Party. ----------- 2 09.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mrs. Veena Kumar Jaiswal, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Shyampur Bhattha P.S. Case No. 42 of 2006 for the offences punishable under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar at Sitamarhi, are named accused in this five years old case being father in law, uncle in law, aunt in law and brother in law of the deceased’s daughter of the informant, who died under suspicion circumstance within few months of her marriage. Submission is that during investigation police did not sent up petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 3 for trial, simply submitted charge sheet against the husband and petitioner no. 4 was shown absconder. But taking different view, 2 cognizance was taken against all the accused persons, but only husband of the deceased who was in custody faced trial and ultimately has been acquitted on 28.05.2009 in Sessions Trial No. 487 of 2008. Further submission is that petitioners be granted the privilege sought. In view of the conduct of the petitioners, who in spite of knowing fully well everything since before avoided appearance at earlier stage of trial. But come out before the court after two years of achieving their ultimate goal of getting inmates of their family, i.e. husband of the deceased acquitted. They appear not entitled for the privilege sought. Accordingly, this application for anticipatory bail is dismissed. Bhardwaj (Akhilesh Chandra, J)