IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 8882 of 2001 Between: Sri Chalasani Venkateswara Rao, S/o.Late Subba Rao, R/o. Bhatla,Penamurru Village, Movva Mandal Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Krishna District. 2 The RDO at Bandaru, Machilipatnam. 3 The MRO, Movva Mandal, At Chilkalgudi, Krishna Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to pass an order or a direction or a Writ more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents not to allot house sites on the bunds of the drainage cannal situated in Survey No.295, Bhatal Penmamurru Village, Krishna District which occupies in an extent of one acre 12 cents as it is violative to Article 19 of the Constitution of India and also violative of principles of natural justice and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.Y.VISWESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR REVENUE FOR R The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.8882 of 2001 O R D E R: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 04.11.2008, this writ petition was directed to be listed for dismissal today. Today, though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither is the counsel for the petitioner present nor is there any representation on his behalf. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J 5th November, 2008. PNV