// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8603/2008 Lalchand S/o Shri Rudha Ram Versus The State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order ::: 11.09.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Smt. Anupama Chaturvedi with Smt. Aradhana Sharma, Counsel for petitioner Shri Amit Ratnawat, Advocate, for Shri R.B. Mathur, Counsel for respondents #### By the Court:- Admit. Shri Amit Ratnawat, brief holder of Shri R.B. Mathur, Advocate, appears for the respondents. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the respondents submits that the appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 9-A of the Rajasthan Excise Act against the order, impugned in this writ petition, has been allowed, therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous. A copy of the order dated 8th September, 2008, passed by the Excise Commissioner, Rajasthan, Udaipur, has been made available to the learned counsel for the petitioner. // 2 // In view of the order passed by the Excise Commissioner, Rajasthan, Udaipur, in the appeal of the petitioner, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition in case necessity so arises. The permission is granted. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//