LNTHEHlGHCOUKTOPCHHATriSQAKH : B1LASPUR Writ Petition No. 2285 of 2002 Petitioner M. P, State Road Traasport Corporation, Through its Divisional Manager, M.P.S.R.T.C. Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through flie Secretar^7, Transport, D. K. Bhavaa, Secretadat, Raipur (C,G.) The Regional Traasport AuUiority, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) The Secretaiy, Regioaal TransportAuthority cuni R.T.0. (Regional Traiisport Officer), Bilaspur. Shri Nami Khaa, Bus Operator, R/o. Maiiendragarh. 2. 3. 4. WRI'I' pETITON UNDEK ACT1CLE 226 & 227 QpTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB: Hon^Dle Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J,) Shn Yogesh Paadey, Advocate for fhe petitioner, Shn Shashank 'I'hakur, Paael Lawyer tbr the respondents No. 1 to 3. None for fhe respondent No.4. 2. O R D ER (Passed on this 10th Day ofNovember, 2008) The petitioner iinpugns fhe order dated 1.10.2U02 (Annexure P/3), whereby admittedly fhe permit was graated to ffae respondent No.4 to run fhe vehicle bearing C,G. 16-A-0316 froni Aaibikapur to Maaendragarh via Latori, Datieiainod, Bishrampur, Soorajpui*, Srinagar, Baikunfhpur, Nagpur, Sajapahad aad back for a period ofone inonfh from. 2. 10.2002 to 31.10.2002. This permit period has atready coiue to an end, 'l'hus nothmg reiaains for adjudication of fhe dispute as no ottier issue is tavolved. Learaed counsel appeariag for fhe petitioner admits tiiat wifh ttie passage of tibxie ftus petition has beconie mfructuous. Thus, ftie petition is disiaissed as having becoiae iiifiractuous. ConsequenUy, M(W)P No. 1340/2002 is also dismissed. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge