IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48143 of 2008 SHIV MUNI RAM @ LAMBU SON OF SRI CHEDI RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHANIHARI,P.S.DURGAWATI,DISTT.KAIMUR(BHABHUA) Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.8457 of 2009 RAMASHISH YADAV SON OF LAL BACHAN YADAV RESIDENT OF MOHALLA BAHELIYA TOLA,P.S.BHABHUA,DISTT.KAIMUR AT BHABHUA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 15.4.2009 Since both the above applications arise out of one and the same police case, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners seek bail in a case which has been registered for offence under Section 364(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Informant is a resident of Maharashtra State and according to him, his brother-in-law has been kidnapped who was an Electrical Supervisor of a Company which was engaged in construction of a bridge over Sone river. There was demand of Rs.50,00000/- for releasing him. In course of investigation, the victim has been recovered and he has described how he was kidnapped. Case diary indicates that the petitioners have also played important role in connection with kidnapping and realization of money. The prayer for bail of other co-accused namely Satyendra Ram, Bijendra Yadav and Nirmal yadav has been rejected. Considering all these, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for bail is rejected. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)