!^- <^ IN THE HIGH COURT QF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CG^l W.P.No.^2-J% 2006 'P ^.s^ y^c^ .^s^^ ^y^-'"' y"" ^" Petitioner ., Shri Duryodhanlal Sahu aged 43 years ^ Son of Shri T.R.Sahu, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Salhejalhal, Tribal Dev. Block Mohala District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus Respondents ... .. .^. 1 . The State Government of Chhattishgarh, / Through the Secretary, 'Efitel Welfare.D&PartBeti-i;. D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) ^c 2.. Principal High School, Dangarh, Block Mohala District Rajnandgaon ^v> Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution oflndia for the issudnce of WRIT in the nature of Mandamus certiorari, Prohibition and for any other suitable writ or writs Order or orders, direction qi_ direction XI-HC-78 *<l*1^tl 9rHI<*> g^ ^|<<|d*l, ^Tl1yjl<i,(«lc1iuy ^ ..^f.^.^S:6(^ 200 3<i^i 4d* (>ici^'si'<ir) 3I^RTqilf??W TOT 311^1 *Ki* tlt Baroe '^ CTmwBfitTsn^T 5.7.2008 Heard Shri R.S. Shrivastaval Miss Dipali Pandey, Panel' advance copy. By this writ petition, the pe «bi<<I<vt41^tiiK<rfTfftel<!) <Ri+<t< ^si^iiTsn^r counse! forthe petitioner. Lawyer for the State/respondents, on fitioner has prayed that respondents be prohibited fromstopping/recoverini the benefit of two advance increments paid to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the dstitioner submitted that two advance increments were granted to the| petitioner on account of acquiring the petitioner is apprehending that je increments and also they recovered quaiification of B. Ed. and now] respondents may stop two advanc^ the amount already paid. So far no notice of recovery passed and ths petitioner has fiiec las been issued or any order has been this petition merely on the ground of apprehension. Therefore, this wi(t petition is premature and same is dismissed. However, as and when caus^ of action arises, the petitioner wiil be at liberty to approach appropriate Fot-um. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge