IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2011 / 28TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1738 of 2011(N) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ SEETHAL.K.R, AGED 15, MINOR, STD. X, ST. THERESA'S CGHSS, ERNAKULAM, REP. BY HER FATHER K.K. RAMESH, AGED 41 YEARS, KAYYAPPILLY LANE, ELAMAKKARA, COCHIN-26. BY ADV. SRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, O/O THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -14. 3. PROGRAMME COMMITTEE CONVENOR, 51ST KERALA SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2010 -11, KOTTAYAM - 686 001. 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM IN THE CAPACITY OF PROGRAMME CONVENOR, ERNAKULAM REVENUE DISTRICT YOUTH FESTIVAL/KALOLSAVAM, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN - 30. 5. ANCHANA RAJANESSH, STANDARD X, ST. MARY'S ANGLO INDIAN GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, FORT KOCHI, KOCHI -682 001. R1,R2 & R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. DILIP MOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 1738 of 2011 N ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 18th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T In the Ernakulam Revenue District School Kalolsavam, petitioner participated in the item 'Kuchuppudi'. She secured the 4th place with 'A Grade'. Complaining that the music was not audible in the stage and that affected her performance, petitioner filed an appeal, which was rejected by Ext.P2 order. It is challenging Ext.P2 order, this writ petition is filed. 2. Ext.P2 order shows that the appellate committee did not find the case of the petitioner true. That apart, the appellate committee has also noticed that there is a difference of 29 marks between the petitioner and the 1st prize winner. Nothing has been placed on record by the petitioner to prove her contention to be factually correct to reject the conclusion of the appellate committee. For that reason and also taking note of the wide disparity in the marks, I am not persuaded to W.P.(C) No.1738/2011 : 2 : interfere with the matter. Writ petition fails and it is dismissed. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge