IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34218 of 2011 Shama Singh S/o Late Thakur Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 18.10.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 323, 341, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 9.9.2011 vide Cr.Misc.No.29360 of 2011 but had been given liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge is his case is not bifurcated for purposes of commitment or charge. It has been submitted that now charges have been framed without bifurcation of this case. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned District and Sessions Judge, Gopalganj in connection with Sessions Trial No.246 of 2011, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor shall be the brother/mother of the petitioner and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The - 2 - bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )