$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 158/2008 SHRI VIJAY KUMAR AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Pragya Srivastava, Advocate. versus SHRI YASHWANT KUMAR GUPTA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. J.S. Lamba, Advocate for respondent 1,2 & 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA O R D E R % 17.01.2018 IA No. 6506/2016 It is submitted by the appellant that per settlement arrived between the parties, they had deposited an amount of `12,50,000/- each totalling to `50.00 Lac with the Registrar General which was to be adjusted with the income tax liability as raised by the income tax department against which an appeal ITA 169/2001 was pending before this Court. The appeal has now been decided and the matter has been remanded to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to be decided afresh. Since the liability is not ascertained as yet and as settled the amount needs to remain with the Registrar General till the income tax liability is paid to the appropriate authority. It is the grievance of the learned counsel for the applicant that Mr.Vijay Kumar Aggarwal against whom the liability has been raised by the Income Tax Department is not cooperating. The learned counsel for the respondent says Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal was to provide the case details of the document relating to the income tax case but such details and documents have not been provided so far, though the learned counsel for the petitioner says such documents have since been provided. To avoid the controversy raised, it would be appropriate the petitioner should file an affidavit along with case details of the documents as stated in clause 7 of the settlement agreement dated 19.10.2010 within four weeks from today. List on 03.05.2018. YOGESH KHANNA, J JANUARY 17, 2018 uj