C-482 No. 195 of 2004 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. (Delay Condonation Application No. 76 of 2008) (Restoration Application No. 163 of 2008) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on the delay condonation application and perused the record. I find sufficient ground to allow the delay condonation application. Accordingly, the delay condoantion application is allowed. The delay in filing the restoration application is hereby condoned. Also heard on the restoration application. I find sufficient ground to allow the restoration application. The order dated 07.01.2008 is hereby recalled. Accordingly, restoration application is allowed. Let the petition be restored to its original number along with interim stay order, if any. Having considered the submission advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the view that there is no flagrant injustice and abuse of process of court in this case. I do not find any merit in this case at this state. Accordingly, the petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed in-limine. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that both the parties have entered into compromise and have settled their dispute outside the court. If it is so, the parties are directed to bring this fact in the knowledge of the trial court where the matter is pending and the trial court after considering this aspect that the parties have settled their dispute outside the court will decide the case expeditiously and without causing any unreasonable delay. (B.C.K., J.) 26.02.2008 ASWAL