IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.12850 of 2008 Between: R.Sunder Rao. … Petitioner And Andhra Bank, reptd., by the Chairman & Managing Director, Andhra Bank, Saifabad, Hyderabad and four others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri G.Vidyasagar. Counsel for the respondents: Dr.K.Lakshmi Narasimha. This Court made the following:’ ORDER:- At the interlocutory stage the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondents 1 and 2 in not settling and releasing the terminal benefits, including pension, gratuity, provident fund contributions and leave salary, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India. At the hearing, Sri G.Vidyasagar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that subsequent to the filing of the Writ Petition, the respondents settled the terminal benefits payable to the petitioner. He, therefore, says that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.16573 of 2008 and WVMP No.2121 of 2008 are dismissed as infructuous and the interim order dated 19-6-2008 is vacated. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:22-4-2009 MNR