^ ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WSIT PETITION (S) No. 2S81 of2008 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Dinesh Kumar Hidko S/o Shd Maya Ram Hidko Aged about 39 years Occupation - Patwari Patwari Halka no.44 Dubatota Tahsil— Konta Dist-Dantewada (C.G.) — VERSUS , .' : . ; ! State of Chhattisgarh Through, Secretary, Department of Revenue Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Dantewada, Dist- Dantewada (C.G.) WRIT PETmON LTNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTmjTION OF INDJA . SB: Hon'ble ShriSatish K. Asnlhotri, J. Present: Miss Deepali Pandey, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the State/respoadente. ORALORDER (Passed on 06m day of May, 2008) Leamed counsel appearing for tfae petitioner submits fhat the petitioner was posted as Patwari in Patwari HalkaNo. 44, Dubatota, Tahsil Konta- District Dantewada. The petitioner has been Iransferred to District Kacker, vide order dated 29.06.20D7. Thistransfer has been made onthe request ofthe petitioaer. Despite the transfer order dated 29.06.2007, the petitioner has not been relieved fromthe oldplace ofpostingtojomhisnewplace ofposting. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that as per policy, this areais speeified as a Scheduled Area and persons cannotbe relieved witheut there being substitute fprfhe same. This is a case where the petitioner has been transferred from one Scheduled Area to other Scheduled Area, thus, this clause may not be applicable to the instant petitioii. 4. The rq?resentation ofthe petitioner for fransferring on his owa e3q)ense has become Ihiitless as the State-authorities have considered his representation and passed the transfer order, but the Said transfer order has not been given efFect to. 5. Since the transfer order has been passed atlhe request ofthe petitioner, I do not find anyreason notto relieve fhe petitionerfi'pmhis oldplace of postmg. 6. The respondents are accordingly directed to make suifable arrangement within a period offour weeks for relieyiag and allowing Ihe petitioner to join his new plaee ofposting. 7. In view of the foregoing, this petition stands disposed of with above- stated directions. No order asto costs. Sd/- ,. SatishK.Agnihom ^4 Judge <«.