IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 6767 of 2002 Between: Sri Nadipelli Muralidhar Rao, S/o Nadipalli Srinivas Rao, Ramagundam Municipality, & Joint Secretary, T.R.S., Karimnagar District. Committee, Karimnagar. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Chief Devisional Manager, Himayatnagar Hyderabad. 2 The Manager Indian Oil Corporation Warangal District. 3 The Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, Rep. by its Secretary Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi. 4 The District Collector, Krimnagar District. 5 Tam Tam Pedda Guruva Reddy, Rep. by its Propriter/General Manager No.1427, 18th Main, 2nd Cross J.P.Nagar II Phase, Bangalore 560 078 6 M/s ABC Engineering Works Engineering Block No.G.20, Plot No. 23, 24, II Road, Jawahar Autonagar, Vijayawada 520 007 7 L.C.C. Company, Rep. by its Propriter/General Manager, OCP I Project stie, SCCL Mining Area, Kamanpur Mandal Karimnagar District. 8 Susheela High Tech Company, OCP Project II site, SCCL Mining Area, Kamanur Mandal, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus Declaring the ction of the land 2nd Respondent in allowing Respondents 5 to 8 to draw H.S.D./Lube Oil, Petrol etc., as being violative of the Lr.No. P-21017/12/92- Dist. dt: 13-8- 96 of the 1st Respondent, and bad in law and consequently direct the respondents 1,2,3,4, restrain themslves from sanctioning Consumer Pumps to Respondent 5 to 8, or any other similar Company in Singareni Collieries Mining area of Karimnagar, Warangal, Khammam District, in the interest of Justice Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.SUDHAKAR REDDY & NEERAJA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 6767 of 2002 ORAL ORDER: As there was no representation, when the writ petition was called for hearing, on 11.6.2009, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. ____________ 12-6-2009 asp