IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 27832 of 2011 Date of decision:- 30.09.2011 Krishan Kumar and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present:- Mr. Surinder Thakur, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Gill, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. **** AJAY TEWARI, J. This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 92 dated 14.07.2011 registered under Sections 323, 324, 326 (Section 326 added later on vide DDR No. 44 dated 26.07.2011) at Police Station Bullowal, District Hoshiarpur, Punjab. On the last date, learned counsel for the petitioner had withdrawn the petition with regard to the petitioner No.1 and today he also states that the petitioner No.1 has surrendered before the Police. On 15.09.2011, the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel has argued that Section 326 IPC has been added later on.” Learned Assistant Advocate General on instructions from SI, Kamaldeep has accepted these factual assertions. CRM-M No. 27832 of 2011 -2- In view of the fact that the main accused has since surrendered, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner No. 2. Ordered accordingly. Petitioner No.2 is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 11.10.2011 and on any other date as and when his presence is required. On his appearance, the Investigating Officer would release him on bail subject to the condition envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr,P.C. Petition stands disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) 30.09.2011 JUDGE shabha