THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8609 of 2011 Dated 01st April, 2011 Between: Smt.T.Padmaja …Petitioner And The Joint Collector, Krishna at Machilipatnam and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri M.M.M.Srinivasa Rao Counsel for Respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside order, dated 27.11.2010, of respondent No.2, whereby he has suspended the petitioner’s fair price shop authorisation. The petitioner, apart from questioning the said order of suspension, felt aggrieved by the inaction of respondent No.2 in completing the enquiry and passing a final order. As regards the relief claimed by the petitioner against the order of suspension, as the said order was passed as far back as 27.11.2010, which was not questioned in appeal, it is not appropriate for this Court to interfere with the said order at this stage. However, I find justification in the petitioner’s grievance against non-completion of enquiry and passing a final order, though more than four months had elapsed from the time of suspending the petitioner’s suspension. Accordingly, while declining to interfere with the order of suspension, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 to complete the enquiry and pass an appropriate order in accordance with the provisions of the A.P.State Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2008, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.10695 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 01st April, 2011 Note: Issue CC in one week. (b/o) VGB