CR No. 1448 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 1448 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.03.2011. Damandeep Singh .......Petitioner Vs. Santokh Singh and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Satinder Khanna, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... SABINA, J. Petitioner has filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 claiming compensation on account of injuries suffered by him in the motor vehicle accident. Vide impugned order dated 8.2.2011, the evidence of the petitioner was closed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has examined two witnesses in support of his case. The doctor, who had given treatment to the petitioner, has since retired. Due to this reason, the petitioner could not examine the doctor on the dates fixed for his evidence. Now, the petitioner wants to prove on record the disability certificate. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves to be allowed. CR No. 1448 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Although, the petitioner has availed seven opportunities to lead his evidence but in the facts and circumstances of the present case, it would be in the interest of justice to allow one more opportunity to the petitioner to lead his evidence to enable him to establish the disability suffered by him. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. The tribunal is directed to grant one opportunity to the petitioner to lead his evidence. (SABINA) JUDGE March 01, 2011 Gurpreet