{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3766 OF 2010 Sow. Lalita Rajendra Nikam Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.P.G.Gunale, advocate for petitioner Mr.K.G.Patil, A.G.P. for respondent no.1. Mr.V.S.Panpatte, advocate for Respondents No.2 and 3. CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND R.M.BORDE, JJ. DATE : 22 nd November, 2010 PER COURT: 1 The petitioner seeks a direction from this Court against Respondents No.2 and 3 to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Anganwadi Supervisor without requiring the petitioner to go before the District Selection Committee. 2 The direction, which is sought, is totally contrary to what has been laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Rajendra Pandurang Pagare Vs. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2009 (4) Bom.C.R. 928, wherein it has been held that it is not permissible for the State Government to grant appointment {2} to the project affected persons without following due process of selection. In that view of the matter, the prayer sought in the petition cannot be granted. 3 Writ Petition, therefore, stands rejected. R.M.BORDE B.R.GAVAI JUDGE JUDGE adb/wp376610