1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 1252 of 2008 [D.M. Umarkar Vs. Mah. Edn. & Welfare Society & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. M.A. Sable, Advocate for the petitioner. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 27th March,2008. 1. Heard. 2. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the Judgment of the School Tribunal dismissing his appeal. 3. The petitioner claimed to be in the employment since August, 1997. 4. It is seen that the petitioner has sought production of documents through Annexure- P-V. This request was rejected by the Tribunal. Petitioner approached this Court by filing Writ Petition No. 2141 of 2006, where the Management gave assurance to produce documents at Serial Nos. 12 and 13 of the List. 5. It is seen that the petitioner never 2 craved for or made any attempt to seek production of documents to prove that he was working during the year 1997 till his alleged termination dated 1st August, 2000. 6. It is further seen that the petitioner has placed reliance on some stray records allegedly signed by Shri Bhoyar, whose being a Headmaster is also in dispute. 7. Petitioner's failure to prove his employment, and assuming that he does not possess documents to prove it, his failure to secure production of documents through employer speaks in volumes. 8. The Judgment of the School Tribunal, therefore, cannot be faulted. Tribunal is right in holding that the petitioner has failed to prove his employment and consequential termination too. 9. In the circumstances, no interference is called for. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. Judge |Hedau| 3