IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39485 of 2009 1. BIRENDRA KUMAR JHA 2. SMT. NIRMALA JHA 3. PRAVEEN KUMAR JHA ALIAS SANJAY Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. ROZI JHA ----------- 2/ 14/01/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State as also for Opposite Party No.2 who has appeared suo motu. The allegations are under Sections- 323, 498A, 379, 380 of Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of D.P. Act. Considering the institution of a divorce case earlier on 18.3.2009 when the present allegations have been made subsequently on 19.5.2009, there being no heinous allegation, let the petitioners above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Pandaul P.S. Case No.93/2009, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. The submission on behalf of Opposite Party 2 No.2 for revival of matrimonial harmony is more appropriately a matter to be considered both in the divorce suit, as well as, the present trial. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)