1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4990 OF 2010 (Shridhar Haribhau Khakre vs. The Collector & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. OCTOBER 13, 2010. Heard Shri Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Joshi, learned AGP for respondents No. 1 to 3 and Shri Kathane, learned counsel for respondent No. 5. It is apparent that the petitioner is indirectly questioning the validity of a resolution in favour of Respondent No. 5. The impugned order passed by the Collector, therefore, cannot be said to be without jurisdiction. The other grievance made by Shri Jaiswal, learned counsel is about objection raised in terms of Section 11 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act before Respondent No. 3. He states that Respondent No. 3 should be directed to decide the same within stipulated time. Shri Kathane, learned counsel as also Shri Joshi, AGP have no objection. In the circumstances, Respondent No. 3 shall decide that objection as early as possible and in any case within a period of six weeks after the date of receipt of 2 this order. With these directions, writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. A copy of this order be furnished to AGP. JUDGE *GS.