IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19385 of 2010 ALO ALAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 09.08.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and for the informant. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 307, 302, 201, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the First information Repot with regard to the deceased Mitarjeet Yadav, there is specific allegation against the co-accused of having caused his death but with regard to the deceased Pradeep Yadav the allegation is that one Kapal Yadav told the informant that the petitioner and Shalo Alam had committed his murder. During investigation the said Kapal Yadav was examined who supported this fact. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the serious nature of the offence. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )