CWP(T) No. 1522 of 2008 29.03.2010 Present: Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. The precise case of the petitioner is that the persons belonging to other districts have been considered while making appointment to the posts of Lab Attendants. He is 75% visually handicapped. The person, whose name has been recommended, is 90% visually handicapped and is 10+2. Petitioner is only matriculate. It is settled principle that the candidates belonging to other districts can also appear for interview and can be selected against the post borne on a particular district cadre. The only restriction in district cadre is that the petitioner is not normally transferred outside the district. Moreover, it has come in the reply that the candidates who have been appointed, they belong to Shimla district alone. Petitioner has also not arrayed the selected candidates. These selected candidates were necessary parties. The petition is liable to be dismissed on this ground also. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge March 29, 2010 (bhupender)