-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 178 OF 2010 WITH REVIEW PETITION (st.) NO. 20747 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2836 OF 2009 Gurunath Arjun Dalvi. ..Applicant/Review Petitioner. Versus Shivkrupa Majoor Sahakari Sanstha ..Respondents. Mr. Kishor Patil for the applicant. None for the respondents. Coram : RANJIT V. MORE, J. Date : February 11, 2011. P. C. : 1. By the above review petition, the applicant is seeking review of the order dated 24/6/2010 passed in the Writ Petition No. 2836 of 2009. Since there is delay, the aforesaid civil application is also filed for condonation of delay. 2. Heard Mr. Kishor Patil, learned counsel for the applicant. By the order impugned in the writ petition, respondent no.1 - society was re- constructed under section 19 of the MCS Act. There is no dispute that the petitioner is member of respondent no.1 society and therefore said srp -: 2 :- order does not prejudice the petitioner’s interest in any manner. Mr. Patil, however, submitted that the control of respondent no.1 society is taken over by a person who poses to be a member of the society. The submission, in my view, has no merit as the remedy of the petitioner lies somewhere else and in any case the dispute about membership of society cannot be gone into, for the first time, in writ petition. Taking overall view of the facts and circumstances into consideration, I am of the view that no case is made out for the review. Hence, review petition as well as civil application are rejected. (RANJIT V. MORE, J.)