IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH OCTOBER 2010 / 5TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 31418 of 2010(B) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- UNNIKRISHNAN, S/O.MOHANAN PILLAI, CHAKKALAKKIZHAKATHIL, KAPPIL MEKKU MURI, KRISHNAPURAM VILLAGE. BY ADVS. SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAYAMKULAM. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAYAMKULAM. 4. PRAKASH, S/O.SIVADASAN AACHARI, AASARIPURAYIDOM, KAPPIL MEKKU, KRISHNAPURAM VILLAGE, KAYAMKULAM. 690533. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS R4 BY ADVS. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR SRI.K.JAGADEESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SVS/ WP(C).No. 31418/2010(B) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 25/07/2010 P2: COPY OF THE C.M.P. NO. P3: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BEFORE THE 1ST AND 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL /TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE SVS/ K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. * * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P.C.No.31418 of 2010 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of October 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.JOSEPH,J The petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs: i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the respondents 1 to 3 to grant protection from the illegal threats of 4th respondent and their gang. 2. Allegations are made against the 4th respondent, essentially who is the brother-in-law of the petitioner. There is reference to proceedings before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Kayamkulam. 3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the 4th respondent and the learned Government Pleader. The learned counsel for the 4th respondent denies the allegations made by the petitioner. He would submit that he has no intention at all to cause any threat to the life of the petitioner. W.P.C.No.31418 of 2010 2 4. We record the same. Besides recording the same, we dispose of the writ petition by directing that in case any complaint is brought to the notice of the 3rd respondent of any threat to the life of the petitioner from the 4th respondent, the 3rd respondent will look into it and if it is found to be genuine, protection to the life of the petitioner against the 4th respondent shall be afforded by the 3rd respondent. We further make it clear that if the matter comes before any court/forum, the said court/forum shall proceed to dispose of the matter untrammeled by anything contained in this judgment. We also make it clear that we have not pronounced on the correctness of the allegations made by the petitioner against the 4th respondent. (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge W.P.C.No.31418 of 2010 3 W.P.C.No.31418 of 2010 4 K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. .No. of 200 ORDER/JUDGMENT 30/082010