IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH w.P. (CJ No. 109% of 2007 PETITIONER l. Lalit Tiwari, son of Late Shyama Charan Tiwari, aged 7O years, R/o. Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.) Lavanya Tiwari, son of Lalit Tiwari, aged about 42 years, R/o. Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS / 1. State of Cl'ihattisgarh through The Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K. S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgar'h) Collector, Raipur Distt. Raipur Nazul Officer, Raipur, Distt. Raipur Lokmaya magazine, through ’ Editor, Lokmaya magazine, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE {26 OF ,THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRmsp IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARY, DIRECT10N1s1 @ Petitioners Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others Dr. N.K. Shukla, Senior Advocate with Mr. Y.C. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Freshen: Mishra, Additicnai Advocate Gener iwith Mr. AS. Kachhawaha, Government Advocate for the respondents No. 1 to 3lState. Mr. B.D. Guru, Advocate for the respondent No. 4/Caveator. ORDER (Passed on 27‘“ day of February, 2007) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not want to press any other ground, except that the application (P/7) pending before the Coliector, Raipur for renewal of the lease, granted earlier be directed to be decided expeditiously. Mr. Prashant Mishra, learned Additional Advocate General with Mr. A.S. Kachhawaha, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents No. 1 to 3 states that no application is found in the record. However, learned counsel for the respondents No. 1 to 3 has no objection to consideration of the application for renewal of the lease, granted earlier, within a period of two weeks. ln view of that, the respondent No. 2 is directed to consider and decide the application (P/7) of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. lt is ordered accordingiy. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with. direction. l l l Sd/— l ‘ Satish K.Agnihotri i i Judge