05.08.2024 Item No.559 Ct. No. 30 Aloke SA 312 of 2001 Rajen Biswas @ Rajen Peter Biswas Vs Smt. Karan Biswas & Ors. Mr. Souma Bhattacharya …. For the respondents Learned counsel for the respondents is present. But there is no representation on behalf of the plaintiff/appellant in the present case. The present second appeal of the year 1999 was preferred against a judgment and decree dated 23rd August, 1999 passed in Title Appeal No. 93 of 1986 by the learned 2nd Additional District Judge, Hooghly, affirming the judgment and decree dated 19th January, 1986 passed by the 1st Assistant District Judge, Hooghly in Title Suit No. 10 of 1972. A copy of the death certificate in respect of the sole appellant in the present case has been placed before this Court. It appears from the said copy that the sole appellant in the present case expired on 22.10.2021. There is neither any representation nor any prayer for substitution on behalf of the plaintiff/appellant. In view of such fact the present appeal abates and is accordingly disposed of. 2 Let a copy of this order be sent to the Court of the 2nd Additional District Judge, Hooghly and the 1st Assistant District Judge, Hooghly, for information. (Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)