IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 30th day of October, 2006 Crl. Bail Application No. 1009 of 2006 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE 1. Irfan S/o Majeed 2. Iqubal S/o Majeed 3. Gufran S/o Majeed All R/o Raheempur, P.S. Gangnehar, District Haridwar. ……….. Applicants Versus State of Uttaranchal ………. Opposite Party Arising out of Crime No. 63 of 1999 Under Sections: 498-A, 452, 323, 504, 506, 307 of I.P.C. & Sec. ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act. Police Station: Pathri. District: Haridwar. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard Mr. Siddhartha Sah, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sanjeev Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned A.G.A. Applicants Irfan, Iqubal and Gufran, who are in jail in connection with crime No. 63 of 1999, relating to the offences punishable under Section 498-A, 452, 323, 504, 506, 307 of the I.P.C. and that of offence punishable under Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, P.S. Pathri, District- Haridwar, have sought their release on bail. All the three applicants are brothers-in-law (JETH) of the complainant. The police has submitted final report in the crime. The cognizance appears to have been taken against all the accused, including the present three applicants. In the circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, in the opinion of this Court, the applicants deserves bail. Let the applicants Irfan, Iquabal and Gufran be released on bail on executing a personal bond by each of them and furnishing two sureties for each one of them of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt. 30.10.2006 H.Negi