CWP No.12537 of 2009 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C. W. P. No. 12537 of 2009 Date of Decision: 8 - 12 - 2009 Chanchal Singh ....Petitioner v. Union of India and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA *** Present: Mr.Balwinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Anjali Kukar, Advocate for the respondents. *** KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the respondents state that there are certain discrepancies regarding the facts which have been noticed during scrutiny. It is stated that in the application for getting passport, petitioner has furnished two date of births to the authorities. Further more, petitioner is relying upon adoption deed and stated that the parents who adopted him are real parents. Counsel further state that petitioner in various records has furnished two different names and different parentage. On the observations made by this Court that for the conduct of the petitioner, is he dis-entitled to grant of passport for whole life. Counsel CWP No.12537 of 2009 [2] for the respondents state that a scrutiny can be made and after imposing any penalty, case of the petitioner can be considered as per policy and rules. Counsel state that for this, petitioner may approach the Passport Officer on any date. This Court appreciate the fair stand taken by the respondents and direct the petitioner to appear before the Passport Officer on 21.12.2009 at 10.00 A.M.. The Passport Officer may call the petitioner on any other date also to satisfy himself, whether the petitioner is entitled to passport or not. In case the petitioner is not to be issued the passport, a speaking order be passed so that petitioner is able to challenge the same before the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. ( KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA ) December 8, 2009. JUDGE RC