HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25366 of 2009 Dated: 24.11.2009 Between: V.Sailaja and another … Petitioner And: The Greater Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, reptd by its Commissioner, Hyderabad and eight others. … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25366 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners claim to be the owners of Flat No.106, Sky High Enclave, Gudimalkapur, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad. According to them, the fourth respondent constructed a pent house on the terrace of the building and respondents 5 to 9 are in occupation of the same and respondents 4 to 9 have undertaken several unauthorized and illegal activities affecting the water supply and other amenities of the petitioners. They seek necessary directions in this regard. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. On the face of it, the writ petition is not maintainable. The grievances pointed out by the petitioners are civil in nature and the determination thereof needs recording of evidence. The petitioners have to approach a civil court to work out their remedies. So far as the alleged unauthorized construction of pent house is concerned, the petitioners can certainly make a representation to the first respondent-Municipal Corporation, and as and when such a representation is made, necessary action thereon shall be taken in accordance with law. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing that: - (a) it shall be open to the petitioners to submit representation as regards the construction of pent house on the terrace and the constructions made in the parking area to the first respondent- Municipal Corporation; (b) as and when such an application is made, necessary action in accordance with law shall be taken by the first respondent-Municipal Corporation after duly issuing notice to the affected parties; and (c) as regards the other grievances of the petitioners vis-à-vis the private parties, it shall be open to them to work out the same in the civil Court. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Dated:24.11.2009 dr