1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6945 of 2011 alongwith CWP No. 7105 of 2011. Decided on: 2nd September, 2011. 1. CWP No. 6945 of 2011. Asha Rani Vs. State of H.P. & others 2. CWP No. 7105 of 2011. Ram Prakash Vs. State of H.P. & others Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate in CWP No. 6945 of 2011. Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate in CWP No. 7105 of 2011. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim the benefit of ad-hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in 2 their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State of H.P. As prayed for, it is open for the petitioners to bring this fact to the notice of the respondents, who shall examine the same. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action, within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, alongwith their representation(s) and a copy of the writ petition(s) as well as a copy of the judgment referred to above, by the petitioner(s). 2. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 2nd September, 2011. (Justice Surinder Singh), (cm/hl) Judge.