FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10983 OF 2008 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.12235 OF 2000 (Laxmibai w/o Vithalrao Atle Vs. Vithalrao s/o Irreddy Atle & anr.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Shri S.V. Kurundkar, Advocate for the applicant ... CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 15th November, 2010 1. Heard. Since the revision applicant could not remove office objections, the Civil Revision Application Stamp was rejected. The matter was heard at least on 9 occasions. Considering the controversy, though there is delay of 2009 days, since the rights of the applicant in the immovable property are involved, for which she moved execution application against the purchaser. It is informed, that there was already a charge created on the property purchased by the purchaser-respondent. In the set of above facts, though the delay is exorbitant, however, considering the apathetic condition of the revision applicant, delay is condoned on costs of Rs.2000/- to be paid within 30 days. Other objections to be removed within a week from today. Application for restoration is allowed on above terms. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE fmp/ca10983.08