IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3250 of 2011 ARUN KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 366(A), 372, 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4/5 of the Immoral Traffic Act. It is alleged that the informant’s daughter went missing on 26.09.2010 for that the F.I.R. was lodged on 01.10.2010. In the F.I.R. though the petitioner is named as one of the co-accused who helps C. T. Devi and Rajesh Kumar. Subsequently, the victim girl was recovered in company of two boys whom the victim claimed to be her friends. The 164 Cr. P.C. statement reflects that on the alleged date of occurrence she was being enticed away by one lady named C. T. Devi. The 164 Cr. P. C. statement reflects that physical relationship was established by one 2 Rajesh Kumar. In 164 Cr. P.C. statement the victim girl has alleged nothing against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the informant submits that during investigation it has come that the petitioner used to visit the house where the victim girl was being kept. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the informant that the victim girl was kept at Kako and the petitioner is resident of same place and the other co-accused has made statement that he saw the victim girl at the house of the petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that such contention of the learned counsel for the informant does not get corroborate from the 164 Cr. P. C. statement of the victim. Considering the fact that the victim has not alleged anything against the petitioner in 164 Cr. P. C. statement, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event 3 of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 411 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Nawada, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)