HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.6730 of 2008 Decided on: 22.09.2009 **** Sandeep Kumar Verma . . . . Petitioner VS. Som Nath Goyal . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Sanjiv Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Amit Rawal, Advocate for the respondent **** SURYA KANT J.(ORAL) This revision petition is directed by the landlord whose eviction petition has been adjourned sine die vide impugned order dated 24.07.2008 passed by the Rent Controller, Ludhiana to await the decision of the Civil Suit for Specific Performance filed by the respondent-tenant, against the deceased-father of the petitioner-landlord. The petitioner is admittedly the son of the owner of the demised premises. Having heard learned counsel for the parties for some time and keeping in view the principles explained by their Lordships of the Supreme Court in R.Kanthimathi and another vs. Beatrice Xaviers (Mrs). (2000) 9 SCC 339, the Civil Court is directed to expedite the hearing of the suit for specific performance and make an endeavour to decide the same as early as possible preferably within six months. The impugned order, however, warrants no interference. Disposed of. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 22.09.2009 shonkar