IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** C.W.P. No.7322 of 2008 Date of Decision:09.09.2011 Gurpreet Singh .....Petitioner Vs. Punjab School Education Board and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. N.D. Vasisht, Advocate for Mr. D.S. Pheruman, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.M. Singh, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Ms. Aarti Gupta, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 6. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) Earlier, on 30.5.2011, counsel for the petitioner was not present and case was adjourned to 2.9.2011. On 2.9.2011, learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 stated before this Court that the case of the petitioner is similar to C.W.P. No.1438 of 2009, which has been dismissed on 30.5.2011. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought time to go through the order passed in above said petition. Today also, a request has been made on the ground that the arguing counsel Mr. D.S. Pheruman is not available for arguments. After going through the petition as well as order passed in C.W.P. No.1438 of 2009, no ground is made out to grant any adjournment as similar petition has already been dismissed and the case of the petitioner is also the same. C.W.P. No.7322 of 2008 -2- Dismissed in view of the order passed in C.W.P. No.1438 of 2009 decided on 30.5.2011. In case the arguing counsel thinks that the case is not at par with the petitioners in C.W.P. No.1438 of 2009, he is at liberty to move an application. September 09, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE