IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD FEBRUARY 2010 / 14TH MAGHA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 1360 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.12524/2001 Dated 26/02/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.I. SALI, S/O. M. ISMAIL, AGED 48 YEARS, ASST. ENGINEER, PWD ROADS SECTION CHENGANNUR, RESIDING AT SHALIMAR, KOLLAKADAVU, CHANGANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.C.UNNIKRISHNAN (KOLLAM) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SURESH KOILERIAN, CHIEF ENGINEER, P.W.D. (ADMINISTRATION) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. P. LATHIKA, CHIEF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION (ADMINISTRATION) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. TOM JOSE, SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF KERALA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. K. JAYAKUMAR, SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF KERALA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.T.T.MAHAMOOD THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/02/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== Contempt Case (C) No.1360 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 3rd day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner complains of non-compliance with Annexure A1 judgment. It is admitted that as per Annexure 1 judgment an order has been passed. But in respect of the same, the petitioner has a complaint that reckoning of the period of suspension is not correct. That is a matter which the petitioner has to take up in a challenge against that order. Without prejudice to such right of the petitioner, this contempt case is closed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2