(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 5300 OF 2009 Dagadu Pandurang Kauthale, Age : 55 years, Occupation : Labour, R/o. Koregaon, Taluka : Shrirampur, District : Ahmednagar. .. Petitioner. versus Superintendent Engineer & Administration of Command Area Development Authority, Nagar-Aurangabad Road, Ahmednagar. .. Respondent. .......................... Mr. P.V. Barde, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.N. Kendre, Assistant Government Pleader, for the respondent. .......................... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 18TH DECEMBER 2009. COURT'S ORDER : 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the (2) award dated 13th February 2009, passed by the learned Judge of the Labour Court, Ahmednagar, in Reference (IDA) No. 11/2003, thereby answering the reference in the negative. 2. Mr. P.V. Barde, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the learned Judge of the Labour Court has failed to take into consideration the fact that the petitioner had completed 240 days and, as such, ought to have answered the reference in the affirmative. 3. The scope of interference into finding of fact is very limited. Unless finding is found to be perverse, it would not be permissible for this court to interfere in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 4. The learned Judge of the Labour Court, upon the evidence placed before him, has found that the petitioner had utterly failed to establish that he had completed 240 days and he has also failed to prove that the persons junior to him were appointed. 5. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp5300