§§W§3§ F Wfwmr; c2: \w/f ® IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIom “1}0. £9“ /2o1o CW! PETITIONER : / Bhawna Gardia, D/o Shri S.N. Gardia, aged about 25 years, R/o Lakhagarh, P.S. Pithoura, District Mahasamund (C.G.), VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Home Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.), Inspector General, Raipur (C.G.), Superintendent of Police, Mahasamund, District Maha- samund (C.G.), The Station House Officer, Police Station Pithoura, District Mahasamund (C.G.), RESPONDENTS //"1 . WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. HEGH COURT OF CHEATTISGARH AT HILASH 1R WRYT PETWWON (Cr.\ Nn‘ 69m oF’lm f) i’ETiTiONER : Bilawm Gardiav, VER SI IS Staig of Chhaitisgarh & Othsr& RESPONDENTS WRET E’E'ETION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TX-E CONSTIHJ'I‘IQN OF WDIA SB: Him’He Shri Satish K. Agnihntr‘i, J. hesent: Shri J.K.Shastri5 Advocate for the petiiioner, mxr£ Ai‘uii Sac, Gavmitizéiit Advocate with Shn' Shaghank E‘hakuri Panel Lawyer for the State/mspondantg: a L “RDER ORAL (Passed on 14‘ day 01 uuoher, 2011) 1, In the mmn‘t petition, the petitionar segks 9 diraction to the respondent authorities ‘io reg'eter a ease mid arrest the accused persons in Crime No. 300/2009 for the oifenee registered under sectioo 384 ofthe Indian Pena} Code, N) At the very omset Shri Saoe learned eounsel appealing for the Siat’e/respondems submitS that a compiaint ease has aiready been filed by the petitioner before the Judicial Magisiraiee Firm. Class. (for Short The JMFC’ ’) Pithorai District. Mahasamund (Aimexore R13) which ie already pending oonsideration hefore the JMFQ Pithora.‘ Thee; this oetition is not maimainahle for the same relie£ Ifthe netitioner hae still any grievanoe. there i3 an anpropriaie stamtorv fomm availabie to which the peiitioner may take recourse, Thus. this petition may be dismissed“ on this eount alone. \V/ 3‘, Ewing considered a1! the aspects ofthe marten it is found that. the petitioner is taking recourse to two forums? one by going to the criminai coon. under the provieions of Code ofCriminal Prooednre and in the same time. filing the instant petition for the same reiief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India The netitioner cannot. he aliowed to pursue two yarahel prooeedingsa for the same relief, 4, In view of the above? the writ petition is dismissed. No order asto 1’ costs. ; w? i t ' Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri" Judge