IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12319 of 2010 VIJAY RAM, son of Late Fakira, resident of Mohalla-Yarpur Ambedkar Colony, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S. Gardanibagh, District Patna. ---Petitioner Versus 1. The City Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. 2. The Chief Accounts Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. 3. The Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 3.8.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Corporation. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the revision of pensionary benefits as also the claim for the difference of salary admissible to the father of the petitioner, who was working as a Sweeper in Ward No.6A of the New Capital Circle of the Respondent- Corporation. Mr Bishwa Bibhuti Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent-Corporation submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be considered as per law. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the City Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna (respondent no.1). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, 2 the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled at the earliest and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)