@iW«a'f '€ tftaS.twW .-s'. (" ^"f sr0 L- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURJC.G.) •^.L'h.. !^~ W.P>9No..........^..b...^;..../200 PETITIONER: sft ..^y- .-•-v'^-;" Lal sahu S/o Shri Munchu Lal sahu, ^ Aged 35 year's Working as L.D.T. (Tribal Departinent) at Govt. Primary School, Sagarpani, R/0 Kotba, Tahsil - Pathalgaon, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) -2. Conunissioner, Tribal Welfare ,0 . Department, Pt.Ravishankar -^ Y ', <^»v' University campus, Raipur (C.G.) yf^y r] o' ^3. Asst. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/327 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER OF UKE NTURE ETC:- XI-HC-78 •sn^rwR-ficb traT3TR^la»iro Sopal *TIN<i'(Ta»*nqt 4-af •^\W^,'BnS\»'\S,RtMltty te5'^<^ \^.2£^l^ 200 3n^?T ifach (yit^o^sc) ^ e;RnwHfN3n^r 19-1-2007 Mr. R.S.Patel, Mr. Ra^ Malieshwari, Mr. Rajendra Tripatti, cour|sel Mr. Sushil Dubey, 6ovemn|ientAdvocate i Gupta, Deputy Govemmer|t Advocate for the State/respondents. •onFfi'B-i »iwnTffi^l'<Rtti;l< ^iS^ITSn^T hwari, Mr. Rahul Jha and fbr the petitloner(s). anctMr.SaUsh counsel appearbig for the parUes, the lof. Wrtt Petttion (S.) No.262 of 2007 in With the consent of toametl matter is heard finatly and dispos^d Common order dictated li|i open Court, passed separately. A copy offtiis order bepla|ced onthe record of the conrwctedwrit peBBons. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge P.T.O. S// !K ^ '^ k HISH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BU-^SPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'HLE MR. ^TISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. Petitioners WRIT PETITION (S.t N0^82 OF 2007 Sundw LalPatel and anottier versus Respondents : State <rf Chhattl^arh and ottiers PeUtioner WRIT PETmON (S.) N0.263 OF 2B87 Puna Ram Sahu versus Respondents : State Govfc of CWtatttegaihandoUiers PeSBoner WRff PETITION (S.l N0.264 OF 2007 Ranr Kunar Satame vereus Resoondents : State Oovt. ofGhhatfegarti andothas WRIT PETmON (S.i NO^eSOF 28W Petitioner : Hemant KumarSalam» Versus Respondents : StateQovt.ofChhattl^arftandoUiers PetJtioner wrar PETITIQIN (s.i NO^BS opzooy Budhnath Sa! Paikra versus Reseondents : Starte of ChhErtfegarttand ottiera wrar pETmoN <s.i NO^S? OF 2007 <L PetiUoner : Madan Lal Sahu -/- versus Respondents : StateofChhaUtegaittandothere Petifoner WRIT PETITION (S.1 N0^89 OF 2«>7 PHamberPatel versus Resoondents : aatetrfChhattisgaitiandrthers Petitioner WRIT PETmON(S.)NO^yOQF 2007 Trinsrth Gtraud»ary versus Respondents : StBtetrfGhhattisgsBhanAothers r Priitioner WRITPETITION (S.t IW.281 OF 2W7 Snrt. DeepU ^irawal veraus ResDondents : StateorChliatBsgarhMidothere Present : Mr. R.S-Patd, Mr. Ravl Maheshwari, h4r. Rahul Jha and Mr. Rajendra Tripathl, counsel for the petitioner(9). Mr. Sushil Dubey, Government A^ocate and Mr. Satish Gupta, Deputy Govemment Advocate forthe State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 19th Day of January, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for »iepariias joinBy suhmit thatthe facts and quesfion <rf law involved in the prssent b^h of writ petiUons are squarely covered by the decision ofthisCourtinthe casa of Yashwant Kumar Bhsrwhwrf vs. 1unfc<M( Cnfporattofl, Dy»ar toHi anoithei'. 2. In subsequent cases, is., Writ PetiUan (S.) hto.4130of 2005 (Sopesft KumarVwma v8. The State Sovt of efcftafffagw* aml anottiw) and other connected matters, ctecided by this Court en 15-12-2006, pursuant to tha meino dated SB-1-1995, issued by the Secretaty, Board of Secondary Educafion, Bhopal andlfte prospeclus aS DiplCTna in Education Examlnatian, it was clarified that ttie nomenclatureof the Basic Training InsUtute, i.e., B.T.I. has been 1 4 changpd and renamal as Diptcwna in Educallon, l.e., Dfd. Accordingty, the D.Ed. eertificate hoktBis are atse coverect by ttr decision in Writ Petitfon (S.) lsto.4130 of 2tX®(Goipesft KumarVwma vs. The Sfefe GoW. ofChhattsgwh aocfanoftei) (Supra). 3. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitians are disposed of in terms <rf ttie declsion of this Court f»the matter <rf Yashwait KiimarBhaiwfwa^ (Supra), subject to verification of Ure firet as to whether the peBtioners have acqulred B.EdJB.T.t./D.Ed. CerBficates at Iheirown expenses as per ths ciroularsdatad 24-12- 1998 and 1-3-1999 and further vi*iether they hava been p»ld tffo adwsawe increments or not. No ordw as to costs. Oopal 4. A copy of this order be ptaced en ttie record of the connected writpetiUons. _^_———--— — Sd/- SarishK. Agnihotn Judge 1 2006(11)MPJR-GS96 1