IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 21ST APRIL 2009 / 1ST VAISAKHA 1931 WP(C).No. 12559 of 2009(L) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER : --------------------- KURIAN MATHEW,CHENNIKKARA HOUSE, AMAYANNOOR.PO, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.G.SANKARAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE SECRETARY,REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,KOTTAYAM. 2. GEORGE MATHEW,PATHIYIL HOUSE,KOODALLOOR, PALA. SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.12559 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 21st day of April, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner submits that in pursuance to Ext.P2, the order passed by the STAT in MVARP No.434/2008, the 1st respondent is to re-settle the timings of the 2nd respondent. It is stated that while doing so, the 1st respondent shall also consider Ext.P3, an objection filed by the petitioner. In this writ petition, he seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P3 also, as and when timings of the 2nd respondent are resettled in pursuance to Ext.P2. 2. Taking note of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P3 in accordance with law, as and when the timings of the 2nd respondent are resettled in pursuance to Ext.P2, if the same has not been already done. 3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg