:^;. EV THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPURfG.G.) W.P.No....so(-2....2006 Petitioner /}J' ^ ,..••' ^ R L. Rusia, aged 69 years, S^ Late Shri G.P. Rusia, Ex-Manager (Purchase) H.S.C.L.BhilaiUmt. • R/o Shashi Sadan, Vidya Vihar, Maharaja Chowk, Opposite Bharat Gas Near Mukta Nagar, At & PO - Dure- 491001 (C.G.) Respondents Versus Chairman-cum-Managmg Dircctor, ^- Hindustan Steelworks Const.Ltd., ?i? >•> , • 'Tfc.you^ - lilwuimiyn £.inoln^mA^<n^- yi"»< 5/1, Commissariat Road, Hastings, KoUcata-700022 fW.B.) 2. GeHeraLMa&agei-E/G t1. .. Hindustan Steelworks Const. Ltd., -Tj,,-ff ^ 4<v>e'>'"•( mAtiA^v ^/,L Nirman Bhawan, Bhilai Nagar, Tah. & Distt. Durg-490001 (C.G.) Writ Petition Under Articles 226/227 of The Constitution Of India for the issuance of -WRIT in the nature of MANDAMUS certiorari, Prohibition and for other suitable wnt or writs, order or orders, direction or directions. XI-HC-78 3'E^^TPIRW, OTflu'IS, ftdltiy .U{?^?<.G'.6.(.3. *tTRdT awra»••^"f--- ^ ICT^ 200 6 3TI^?Tq'Ri' (yit^ci^eT) STI^T^T^TRi aSTT3n^Tst>ll=b \— Ban/e 6WIS]KHf^tT3tI^T 27.6.2006:- Heard Shri R.S. Shrivastava,! The grievance of the petitic|i retira! benefits as mentioned in Ad petitioner in spite of the order of th| the Writ Petition No.1682/96. Learned counsel for the petit| Rs.30,000/- has been paid against as mentioned in Annexure-P/3 hasl that in the circumstances, respond^nts the petitioner and make payment at| 1 have perused the record. V Writ Petition No.1682/96 the High respondents to decide the claim of dues expeditiously. In spite of petitioner have not been paid to hir^ again reiterated and respondents ^ petitioner and make payment as period of 2 months from today, in a4 With the direction aforesaid, Consequently, M.pA/.)P. No.^: Parties are entitled for certifi4 'biirci'fl'f '<itiCTT¥te^l'tRi^K ^Stf^ITain^T counsel for the petitioner. ner raised in this petition is that the nexure-P/3 are not being paid to the i High Court dated 16-7-99 passed in |oner submitted that only an amount of |the gratuity and the remaining amount not been paid. He further submitted be directed to decide the claim of Ithe eariiest. rideorder dated 16-7-99 passed in the pourt of Madhya Pradesh directed the the petitioner and release his retiral Ehat retirai dues as claimed by the ti, therefore, in the circumstances, it is jre directed to decide the claim of the ^dmissible td the petitioner, within a tcordance with law. (he petition stands disposed of. (303/2006 also stands disposed of. td copy of this order. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge