1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No.3586 Of 2007 The Osmanabad Wholesale Dealers Retailers and Hawkers Licencees Assocation, Ganesh Nagar, Osmanabad. .. Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents. -------- Smt. M.A. Kulkarni, Advocate for petitioner. Shri. K.B. Choudhari, Additional Government Pleader for the respondents. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE: 5th APRIL 2010 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) In paragraph 7 of the affidavit-in- reply filed by Additional Supply Officer, 2 Osmanabad it is averred : “7. In reply to para No.5 of the petition, I say and submit that, for the convenience of the petitioner, the option was called for by issuing the notice to the petitioner as per Rules and Regulation, and thereafter as per the answer given by the petitioner to the above notices, as per their request Kerosene quot has already distributed through wholesalers to retailers and hawkers and not through the semi wholesalers as the petitioner and members of his organisation demanded.” 3) In the light of the above, no interference is called for by this Court in exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4) The writ petition is disposed of. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.3586.07