-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2947 OF 2004 IN W.P.NO.1050 OF 2000 Mr.Mahavir Prasada Sarawagi ...Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents ... Ms.Seema Gupta i/b A.M.Saraogi Advocate for Applicant Mr.K.V.Saste A.P.P. for State Mr.Ganesh Gole Adv. for Respondent No.2 ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 31,2006 DATE : JULY 31,2006 DATE : JULY 31,2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned advocate for the Respondent No.2-original complainant. 2. This application is for restoration of Cri.W.P.No. 1050 of 2000 which was dismissed for non-removal of office objections within the stipulated time. -2- 3. W.P.No.1050 of 2000 was preferred for quashing of process in C.C.No.923 of 2000 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate F.C. Court No.1, Bhiwandi, Dist. Thane. Mr.Gole, the learned advocate who appears for the Respondent-original complainant states that complaint has been dismissed. In this view of the matter, the present application as well as writ petition do not survive and are disposed of as such. Liberty is granted to the applicant-petitioner for revival of the application as well as writ petition in case the complaint is restored or to prefer a fresh writ petition. 4. Application is disposed of [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]