((-1-)) HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 358 OF 2006 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 188 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd. ... Respondent Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2007 DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2007 DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Question No. 2 is covered by the Supreme Court Judgment reported in 290 ITR 667 and the first question is covered by the judgment of a Coordinate Bench of this Court dated 18.2.2002, in Income Tax Appeal No. 741 of 2000 in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd. a S.L.P. against which was dismissed on 10.11.2003. Appeal dismissed as the questions of law do not survive. The Motion is also dismissed as infructous. Refund of court fees as per rules. C.C. expedited. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)