IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.3558 of 2011 MD. YUSUF Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 3 06.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. The petitioner is not named in the first informant report and in course of investigation, his name surfaced in this case. Learned Addl. Sessions Judge rejected the prayer for bail of the petitioner after considering paragraghs-59 & 67 of the case diary. The perusal of case diary shows that in paragraph-59, one witness , namely, Mritunjay Paswan has claimed to have seen the petitioner alongwith some other persons sitting near the place of occurrence prior to the alleged occurrence and so far as paragraph-67 of the case diary is concerned, it is supervision report of SDPO, Forbesganj. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, namely Md. Yusuf be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 94 of 2005 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)