IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2009 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 11050 of 2009(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MAHARASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LIMITED SYNDICATE HOUSE, MANIPAL-576 104, REP.BY ITS ERNAKULAM BRANCH MANAGER, MR.CHRISTY BOY, S/O.JOHNSON, AGED 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT ANUGRAHA BHAVAN, H.NO.254, SRINAGAR, VADAKKEVILA P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.R.DAYANANDA PRABHU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM. 2. MR.SHABJAN.S., S/O.SULAIMAN KUNJU, KARIKUZHI VEEDU, MAYYANAD P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. MR.P.N.SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.11050 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 3rd day of April, 2009 J U D G M E N T In this writ petition, all that the petitioner seeks is a direction to the 1st respondent to pass orders on Ext.P1, an application made by the petitioner for fresh registration of old vehicle. Orders have not been passed on Ext.P1, and therefore, the writ petition has been filed. 2. Taking note of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to pass orders on Ext.P1. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, with notice to the 2nd respondent. 3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg