IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-6937 of 2011 (O & M) Date of decision: 06.09.2011 Vivek ..... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.S.K. Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sidharth Sarup, DAG, Haryana. for respondent No.1-State. **** RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) This is a petitioner under section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.108 dated 05.02.2011 under sections 323, 452, 324 and 506 IPC. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Rajpal, submits at the outset that the statement of the complainant has been recorded by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karnal. According to him, in view of the same, the investigating agency proposes to submit a cancellation report before the court below. Aforesaid statement is not controverted by counsel for the parties. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, it appears that prayer made in this petition has been rendered infructuous. The present petition is, thus, dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE September 06, 2011 sukhpreet