IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2385 of 2005 ZULFEKAR ALI BHUTTO @ ZULFEKAR ALI Versus SAIDA KHATOON ----------- 4 18.07.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the opposite parties. The impugned order dated 21.9.2005 passed by the Court of Munsif holding that the suit filed by the petitioner to be not maintainable before Civil Court does not suffer from any jurisdictional error inasmuch as it is absolutely clear from the prayer made in the plaint that the plaintiff-petitioner had sought a declaration from the Civil Court that the defendant Saida Khatoon is his divorced wife. Such declaration sought for would essentially make the suit maintainable before the Family Court and not before the Civil Court. On perusal of Section 7 of the Family Court Act it is found that jurisdiction for entertaining such suit has been exclusively vested only in the Family Court. In that view of the matter, there is no error in the impugned order. Accordingly this Civil Revision application is dismissed. BCJ (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)