- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.228 OF 2004 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.172 OF 2003 ... Harilal & Co. ...Plaintiffs v/s. Supreme Hi-Tech Engineering Services Ltd. ...Defendants ... Mr.C.D.Patel i/b A.A. Jain for the Plaintiffs. Mr.L.K.Tripathi for the Defendant. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 28TH NOVEMBER,2006 - 2 - P.C.: The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff states that the Defendant has been served. Affidavit of service has been filed. Defendant has not filed any application for leave to defend the suit within the period allowed by Order 37 of the CPC. Therefore, the Plaintiff is entitled to the judgment. Heard the learned Counsel for the Plaintiff. Perused the record. Summons for judgment is granted. Suit of the Plaintiff is decreed in terms of prayer clauses of the suit. Refund of court fees as per rules. ...