IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 12353 of 1996 Between: K.Appala Naidu, S/o K,Tata, Age 30Yrs., Working as Attender, Andhra Pradesh Vikalangula Co-operative Corporation (Training-cum-production Centre) Gajapathinagaram, Vizianagaram. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh Vikalangula Co-operative Corporation, Venkataramana Apartments, A.C.Guards, Hyderabad. 2. District Manager, Andhra Pradesh Vikalangula Co-operative Corporation, Gajapathinagaram, Vizianagaram District. 3. S.Eshwar Rao, Junior Assistant, Tricycle Manufacturing Unit, Andhra Pradesh Vikalangula Co-opearive corporation, Gajapathinagaram, Vizianagaram. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction or a writ particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring that the action on the part of respondent is arbitrary, discriminatory, illegal in not posting the petitioner to the post of Junior Assistant on par with the 3rd respondent and thereby direct the respondent for the payment of all the consequential benefits from the date on which the petitioner is eligible to hold the post of Junior Assistant. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.SAMINENI KISHORE Counsel for the Respondents: MR.K.RAMANUJACHARI The Court made the following : ORDER: The complaint of the petitioner is that he is entitled for promotion on par with one Mr.Eshwar- third respondent. It is brought to my notice that the third respondent was reverted from the promoted post. Thereafter, though the third respondent challenged the same by way of a writ petition, in view of the altered conditions as to reconstructing of the special pattern in the corporation, he had withdrawn the writ petition. Therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. __________ 14-10-2004 klp To 1. The Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh Vikalangula Co-operative Corporation, Venkataramana Apartments, A.C.Guards, Hyderabad. 2. District Manager, Andhra Pradesh Vikalangula Co-operative Corporation, Gajapathinagaram, Vizianagaram District. 3.2CD copies