IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2008 / 4TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 18935 of 2006(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ DR.G.MONY, DEVI NAGAR, KALADY, KARAMANA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SECRETARY, KATTAKKADA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KATTAKKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. AJITHA BEGAM, PRESIDENT, KATTAKKADA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KATTAKKADA. 5. THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NATIONAL HIGHWAY DIVISION, (PWD), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTAKKADA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 7. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, NEYYATTINKARA. 8. THE TALUK SURVEYOR, SURVEY DEPARTMENT, NEYYATTINKARA. BY Sr.Govt. Pleader Sri.Basant Balaji THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.C.NO.18935 of 2006 EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT INDICATING PAYMENT OF LAND TAX. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 27-11-2005 EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 27-5-2006 EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY DATED 24-6-06 EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 7-7-06 EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 11-07-2006. EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11-7-06 ISSUED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT. /True Copy/ PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(c).No.18935 OF 2006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 25th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT The grievance which the petitioner has voiced in this writ petition is that he is being dispossessed of his properties without recourse to law. It is seen from documents - Exts.P5, P6 and P7 that the authorities such as Deputy Collector, District Collector and the Executive Engineer whom the petitioner had approached had passed orders granting relief to the petitioner to a certain extent. The writ petition accordingly is disposed of on the basis that it is not at present necessary to grant the relief. It is however made clear that this judgment will not stand in the way of the petitioner approaching this court again in the event of any genuine cause of action surfacing. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE sv.