IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 24975 of 2003 Between: M/s. A.L. Sudershan and Company, Rep. by its partner A.L. Rajashankar, S/o. A.K.Lakshmipathi 7-3-720, R.P. Road, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintending Engineer, Electrical, North Circle, A.P.C.P.D.C.C.L Mint Compound, Hyderabad. 2 The Divisional Engineer, City Circle -IV, A.P. Transco, Ferozguda, Secunderabad. 3 Asst.Divisional Engineer, Operation, A.P.Transco Old Boinapally, Secunderabad. 4 Assistant Engineer, Operation , A.P. Transco, Old Boinapally, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction prefereably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in proceeding with the laying of Electrical Towers for supply of High Tension Electricity supply through the petitioner's site to an extent of 4,200 Sq. Yards situated in Sy.No.33/Part, Boinapally, Secunderabad, without following due process of law, as arbitrary, illegal contrary to section 42 of Electricity Supply Act, 1948 and also violative of Articles 19 (1)(g) and 300-A of the Constitution of India; and consequently direct the respondents to drop the said proposal, to enable the petitioner to enjoy the said site; and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.KANAKAIAH Counsel for the Respondent No.: O.MANOHAR REDDY(SC FOR APTRANSCO) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 24975 of 2003 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed challenging the action of the respondents in proceeding with laying of electrical towers for supply of high tension electricity supply through the petitioner’s site as illegal and arbitrary. It is submitted by the learned counsel that as much as electrical towers have already been erected, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly closed. No order as to costs. ____________ 22-6-2009 asp