[ 3183 ] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY- WRIT PETITION NO: 9047 OF 2022 -- Between: 1 Gangadhara Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Late Rajaiah Petitioner AND 1. The State of Telangana, rep by its Prl. Secretary, Revenue Department- Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad 2. The District Collecior, Bhadradri Kothagudem District at Kothagudem - 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District - 4. The Tahsildar, Dammapeta Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District - 5. Dara Tara Rao, S/o. Late Dara Ramalignama, Aged major, R/o. Dammapetl Village Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District Respondents WHEREAS the Petitioner above named through his Advocate SRI PENUBALLI RAMESH BABU presented this Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ. Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in passing the proceedings vide Rc No. 8/'1236/2019, dated 26.07.2019 in connection with the petitioner agricultural lands to an extent of Ac.2.14 gts in Sy No. 188 of Peddagollagudem Village of Dammapeta Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District by informrng that basing on the old PPB issued in favour of the Sth respondent as per revenue records the present Tahsildar has done DS in favour of the Sth respondent, is highly illegal, arbitrary and against to the principles of natural justice by settjng aside the proceedings dated 26.07.2019 and consequently direct the 4th respondent to remove the 5th respondent name from the revenue records and issue the PPBs and TTDs in favour of the petitioner in the interest of justice (sHow oAUSE NOTICE BEFORE.ADMTSSTON) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri PENUBALLI RAMESH BABU Advocate for the Petitioner, directed issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this WRIT PETITION should not be admitted. You viz Dara Tara Rao, S/o. Late Dara Ramalignama, Aged major, R/o Dammapeta Village Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District are directed to show cause on or before 04.04.2022 to which date the case stands posted as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the affidavit filed therewith (copy enclosed) this WRIT PETITION should not be admitted. The Court made the following: ORDER Notice to R5. Personal service to R5 permitted. List on 04.04.2022. 1 To, SD/- T. KRISHNA KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// p SECTION OFFICER 1. Dara Tara Rao, S/o. Late Dara Ramalignama, Aged major, R/o. Dammapeta Village Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District (addresses 1, by RPAD- along with a copy of petition and affidavlt) 2 One CC to SRl. PENUBALLI RAMESH BABU Advocate [OPUC] 3. TwoCCsto GP FOR REVENUE (TG), High Courtforthe State ofTelangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 4. One spare copy i,' HIGH COURT BVRJ / DArED:2110212022 NOTE: LIST ON 04.04.2022 NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION -- WP.No.9047 oJ 2022 .$ \