IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 28TH AUGUST 2009 / 6TH BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 25137 of 2009(J) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- ROY THOMAS, MANAGING PARTNER, 'M/S. ALLIED TIMBERS' S.H.MOUNT P.O., PERUMBAIKADU VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM- 686 006. BY ADV. SMT.A.SREEKALA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. KUMARANALLOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY KUMARANALLOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.25137 of 2009-J = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 28th day of August, 2009. JUDGMENT 1.Notice to the respondents dispensed with preserving their right to seek re-hearing of this writ petition, if aggrieved. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.Exhibit P11 is a Government notification. The petitioner states that his application Ext.P10 is eligible for consideration in the light of Ext.P11. Ext.P9 is issued rejecting the request of the petitioner for renewal of licence notwithstanding the fact that the petitioner pleads that Ext.P10 could be considered for licence on the basis of Ext.P11 which was not noticed by the panchayat authorities while issuing Ext.P9. WP(C)25137/09 -: 2 :- Without expressing anything on merits, this writ petition is ordered directing that the competent among the respondents will take up Ext.P10 and issue a decision thereon also considering the plea of the petitioner that Ext.P11 is relevant. Let that be done within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/100909