IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR APPEAL AGAINST ORDER NO. 103/2010 (M/s. Shyambaba Rerollers Pvt. Ltd vrs. Shri Surya Mining Company Pvt., Ltd. and another) AND APPEAL AGAINST ORDER NO. 104/2010 (M/s. Shyambaba Rerollers Pvt. Ltd vrs. Shri Surya Mining Company Pvt., Ltd. and others) ................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................... Shri S.V.Bhutada, counsel for appellant H.D.Dangre, Counsel for respondent No.1 ... CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 23rd FEBRUARY, 2011. The appellant is the original defendant no.2 in both these matters and is presented by Shri S.V.Bhutada, Advocate. The respondent no.1 is the original plaintiff and is represented by Shri H.D.Dangre, Advocate. The respondent no.2 is the original defendant no.1 and is represented by Shri M.M.Agnihotri, Advocate. In A.O. No. 104/2010, the respondent no. 3 remains unrepresented. The learned counsel for the parties agree that the respondent no. 3 M/s. Vyankatesh Castings Pvt. Ltd., in A.O. NO. 104/2010, is not the contesting party. The learned counsel appearing for rest of the parties in both the appeals have filed Minutes of Order, containing the terms of settlement, dated 23rd February, 2011. The same are marked as “X” for identification in both the matters. The same are signed by the learned counsel appearing for the concerned parties and the same are taken on record. Both the Appeal Against Order, therefore, stands disposed of in terms of the Minutes of Order, dated 23rd February, 2011, marked as “X”. No orders as to costs. JUDGE Rvjalit