IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14464 of 2011 1. Suraj Ram S/O Late Kripal Ram P.D.S. Dealer, Bhurwal, R/O Vill.- Bhurwal, Block- Karakat, P.S.- Karakat, Distt.- Rohtas 2. Arvind Tiwary S/O Late Ramashish Tiwary P.D.S. Dealer - Osaon, Vill.- Osaon, P.S.- Kachhwa, Block- Karakat, Distt.- Rohtas 3. Ram Naresh Tiwary S/O Late Hridyanand Tiwary P.D.S. Dealer - Gharwasdhi, R/O Vill.- Gharwasdhi, P.S.- Kachwa, Block- Karakat, Distt.- Rohtas 4. Gorakh Nath Singh S/O Late Tega Singh P.D.S. Dealer - Jay Shree, R/O Vill.- Jay Shree, P.S. & Block- Karakat (Gorari), Distt.- Rohtas 5. Bhiya Ram S/O Late Babu Lal P.D.S. Dealer, Jorwarpur, Vill.- Jorwarpur, P.S. & Block- Karakat (Gorari), Distt.- Rohtas 6. Vikrama Singh S/O Late Mundrika Singh P.D.S. Dealer - Pandey Dehri, R/O Vill.- Pandey Dehri, P.S.- Karakat (Gorari), Distt.- Rohtas 7. Bhrigunath Prasad S/O Late Deo Narayan Sah P.D.S. Dealer - Modha, R/O Vill.- Motha, P.S.- Karakat (Gorari), Distt.- Rohtas 8. Raj Kishore Paswan S/O Late Bhikhan Ram P.D.S. Dealer - Kaupa, R/O Vill.- Kaupa, P.S.- Karakat (Gorari), Distt.- Rohtas 9. Manoj Kumar S/O Late Sakhichand Prasad P.D.S. Dealer - Motha, R/O Vill.- Motha, P.S.- Karakat (Gorari), Distt.- Rohtas Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Rural Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna 2. The District Magistrate, Rohtas 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Rohtas 4. The Block Development Officer, Karakat, Rohtas 2 26.9.2011 The petitioners, who are P.D.S. dealer at Karakat block in the district of Rohtas, seeks quashing of the order dated 18.6.2011 passed by the Block Development Officer, Karakat whereby they have been directed to refund the value undistributed rice under S.G.RY. Scheme at the A.P.L.rate of Rs.13.75 per Kgs. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. KHAN As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would also govern the instant writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection, as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioners would either deposit 20% of the value of their respective undistributed rice at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within two months. This order would not come in the way of petitioners, if they want to deposit the value of rice or rice itself in excess of 20%. (S.P.Singh,J)