WPCRL No. 864 of 2009 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. B.S. Bhandari, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Advocate present for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder present for respondent State. Learned Brief Holder for the State makes a statement that after completion of investigation charge sheet has been filed against the petitioners Smt. Himuli Devi and Omed Singh Papola, as such, as against them the prayer for quashing the F.I.R., has become infructuous. As far as petitioner No. 3 Suraj Singh Papola is concerned, having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, as mentioned in the F.I.R. and other papers on record, this Court is not inclined to quash the F.I.R. filed against said accused. He is said to be absconding. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous as against petitioner No. 1 Smt. Himuli Devi and petitioner No. 2 Omed Singh Papola. As against petitioner No. 3 Suraj Singh Papola the writ petition is dismissed on merits. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 05.03.2010 HN