IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 29TH MARCH 2010 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 10657 of 2010(F) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- VELAYUDHAN KUNNEKKATT, SANTHINILAYAM, CHENNARA.P.O., MANGALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.MANSOOR.B.H. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, CIVIL STATION, MALAPPURAM. 2. DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER(HEALTH), MALAPPURAM. 3. STATE OF KERLA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE (M) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARAIT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.10657 of 2010-F - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 29th day of March, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioner is stated to be a social worker focusing mainly on health issues of the general public. He is aggrieved by the action taken by the Hospital Management Committee, alleged to be in violation of Ext.P1. The District Hospital, Manjeri is now converted as General Hospital and renamed as Sihab Tangal Memorial Government General Hospital, by Ext.P1. There is a rider therein that the Hospital Management Committee of the Hospital shall discharge only routine functions and shall not make any new financial commitment and shall not make appointment of any new staff. Alleging that the Hospital Management Committee is proposing to make temporary appointments, etc., this writ petition has been filed. 2. In the light of Ext.P1 order, I do not think this court, at this stage, need consider the grievance raised by the petitioner in such matters. It is up to the petitioner to move the Government or any other authority who is empowered to take action in these matters, if there is an alleged violation of the conditions provided in Ext.P1. Therefore, the writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) wpc /2010 2 kav/