IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 22ND KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 12764 of 2009(M) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SREEKUMAR.M.A., MANAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHERANELLOOR. BY ADVS. MR.SIBY MATHEW, MR.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU, MR.B.PREMNATH. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,ERNAKULAM. 3. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACQUISITION), VALLARPADOM INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TRANSSHIPMENT TERMINAL PROJECT,ELOOR. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. M.P. SREEKRISHNAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/11/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 12764 OF 2009 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The petitioner claims that he has not been paid the entire amount due in terms of a rehabilitation package in relation to the acquisition of land for Vallarpadom International Container Transshipment Terminal Project. His allegation is that he has been denied the benefit of the package and the value of two cents of land at DLPC rates. 2. Ext.P1 shows that the petitioner obtained title to a plot of land, which is 'A' schedule therein. 'B' schedule gives him ½ right over a pathway and ½ title over that piece. The materials would disclose that the petitioner had accepted the package and had even executed the sale in favour of the State. The respondents are therefore justified in contending that his present attempt is only to include an item over which he had undivided interest also, into the rehabilitation package. The petitioner is not entitled to such relief. The Writ Petition fails and the same is accordingly dismissed. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge ps