IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7702 of 2008 YOGENDRA JHA & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 04 27.10.2010 This matter has been listed at the instance of the petitioners. Heard. It is submitted that in paragraph no.3 at page 1 of order dated 24.09.2010, it has been wrongly stated that petitioners did receive salary from the month of November 2000 to January 2001. Referring to averments made in paragraph no. 13 of the application, it is submitted that in fact opposite party no.2 (complainant) had received the salary for the month of November 2000 to January 2001. Learned counsel for the petitioners appears to be correct in his submission. Accordingly, paragraph no.3 at page 1 of the order dated 24.09.2010 is modified/clarified in the following manner:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are documents on record that would indicate that the opposite party (complainant) did receive salary for the month of November 2000 to January 2001.” Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)