1/3 (1)-S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 5973/2005. (Smt. Bhanwari Devi Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) (2)-S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 5967/2005. (Dhoola Ram Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) (3)-S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 5964/2005. (Sukh Ram and Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) (4)-S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 5972/2005. (Bhanwara Ram and Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) (5)-S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 5971/2005. (Pema Ram and Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) (6)-S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 5965/2005. (Vishnu Lal Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) (7)-S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 5966/2005. (Devi Lal Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) (8)-S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 5974/2005. (Badri Ram Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) DATE OF ORDER : 19.11.2007. HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Rajeev Purohit, for the petitioners. Mr. Shyam Ladrecha, Additional Govt. Advocate. 1. Both the learned counsels submit that these matters relating to correction in mutation entries in revenue records, are covered by a decision of this Court in bunch of matters namely S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1649/2003 (Hazari Ram Vs. State and Anr.) decided on 20.10.2003 and these writ petitions can also be disposed of in the same terms. 2/3 2. The principal contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that on the basis of an order passed by the State Government, the local authorities have straightaway changed the revenue record without affording an opportunity to the petitioner. This contention is not disputed. 3. Whatever is the merit of the case, before an adverse order was passed against the petitioners, it would have been proper only if a notice was given and opportunity of hearing was afforded to those whose names are removed. 4. In this view of the matter, the order of correction of entries is set aside and the parties are relegated to the concerned Tehsildar. There the petitioners will be heard and the petitioners will be permitted to raise all legitimate objections. In the light of the objections and directives of Law, the matter will be decided objectively by the concerned Tehsildar. The parties will appear before the concerned Tehsildar on 18.12.2007 for representing their case. 5. With these observations, these petitions are disposed of. In case, any grievance remains to the petitioners, they will be at liberty to approach appropriate forum, in accordance with law. 3/3 (Dr.VINEET KOTHARI)J. Sr.No.24-31 /gandhi