IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31861 of 2010 DILIP SADA Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 10.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Embezzlement of allotted money for different schemes is the allegation. Submission is that the same has been leveled by nephew of ex-mukhiya whom this petitioner defeated rather illegal appointment of informant’s wife and niece was detected and action was taken in their termination otherwise nowhere it has come in course of investigation that work was not done. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 47 of 2009 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saharsa subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)