THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.19916 of 1997 ORAL ORDER: The learned counsel for respondents filed a letter dated 19.1.2003 into the Registry stating that the petitioner, who is an employee of Respondent- ECIL filed the present writ petition challenging the promotion of fifth respondent, and after filing the writ petition, he applied for voluntary retirement and the Respondent Corporation had accepted his request and the petitioner was relieved from duties on 14.8.2001, therefore, no cause survives in the writ petition for adjudication. Recording the same, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 21.2.2007 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.19916 of 1997 21.2.2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.19916 of 1997 Date: 21st February, 2006 Between: B.B.Narsing Rao .. Petitioner And Electronics Corporation of India Ltd, represented by its Chairman and Managing Director ECIL, Hyderabad & others. .. Respondents