IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4089 of 2008 Bahadur Sah , Son of Late Prameshwar Sah, resident of Village- Ithari, Police Station- Maruana , District-Supaul ------------------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Water Resources & Rehabilitation Department,Bihar,Patna 2. The Director , Land Acquisition, Water Resources Department,Bihar,Patna 3. The Rehabilitation Officer, Medium Irrigation Project, Bhagalpur -------------------------------- Respondents. ---------------------------------- 03 23-08-2011 Sri Ravindra Nath Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority by filing a representation for the reliefs sought for in the present writ petition. Sri Grijesh Kumar, learned A.C. to A.A.G. no.1 submits that counter affidavit has already been filed, wherein it has been indicated that the petitioner’s service was not confirmed and, as such, he was not entitled to get the benefit of A.C.P. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority by filing a detailed representation. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, the Court expects that the authority concerned will examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of such 2 representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)