BC-78 ^3wT ;=ZTRnc5?r, u>TTl'<-i<i<o, Roi<<l^ *ii<ioi ^in^ ..^!&^).^D..^><^.:^...... ^p^20C^ 3fT^9T CRcp (^c|i^6|«£;) OT^^TcmRFTTc^ ?[S(T3TT^^T^^tc^ ^cTT^R ;Hf^T 3TT^$T (Sinale Bench; Hon'bM W.P. [ PETITEONER c^i^ic*><nTi+ii^c^T^Tsl^<<Fji^-ci'< ^ari^ran^^T Mr. Justice bhirendra Mishra) 1 No.6539/2008 (Petition U/A 226/1227 of Constitution of India) Sangr^im Singh Thakur, S/o Shri Kane Singh Thaku^ Aged about 46 years, Employed as Assis11ant Grade-III, O/o Executive Eng'm^er. M.R.P. bam Oivision No.2, Water Resou^ces bepartment, Mahasamund, Residi Distt. Vs RESPONbENTS \\g at Village: A/14 MRP Rudri Colony, Ibhamtari. 1. St(|iteof Chhattisgarh/through : the Se^retary, Water Resources bepartment, b.^.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur 492001 (c4) 2. Th^ Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources bebartment, Sihawa Bhawan, Civit Lines, Railpur 492 001 (CG) 3. Th| be| 4. Thi Dei L Present: Mr. B.P. Rao, Advocate for the ^ Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer f<j 24.11.2008 With the consent of heard finally. Chief Engineer, Water Resources 3artment, M.R.P., Raipur (.CG) Executive Engineer, Water Resources partment/Mahasamund (CG) etitioner. ir the State. lear|ied counsel for the parties, the petition is <,^^s^ ^OTT r^i«io^,u>-al^<i<»,Rrti'<iy TPIcH^'qTq? 31T^?T q^Zp ((lc|Ij6|c£i) ^200 ^^TcI^f^TT^ cT^n3TT^^T^HT<^ ^ ^RTTWr "^Tf^T 3TT^5T -2r petitioner may be given an op] cpi^fc*)j1Ti ^i^c^T^'fe^t^Ri^-ci^ ^3T^T3TI^?T Learned counsel for the pjetitioner submits that for the present the )rtunity of filing detailed representation before the competent author|ity, to which learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. Having considered and wit^out expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the opinion of this Cf\ is granted to the petitioner to grievances before the competen on such representation being •urt, ends of justice will be served if liberty make a detailed representation raising his authority of the respondents Qlong with a copy of this petition and order, v|/ithin a period of one month from today and filed, the competent authority of the respondents may decide the sam^ on its own merit, in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably witljiin a penod of three months from the date of receipt of the representation.j The petition is disposed oi\ Certified copy as per rule^ accordingly. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge