1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41764 of 2010 SUNIL YADAV, SON OF CHANDAR YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHESHPUR, P.S. SANGRAMPUR, DISTRICT MUNGER-----PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR------------------------------------------------OPP.PARTY ----------- For the petitioner : Mr.Sanjeev Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr.Binod Kumar No.3, APP ----- 2. 22.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional P.P. for the State. The petitioner prays for bail in a case under Sections 302, 447, 147, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present matter with respect to the land in question Title Suit No. 130/1991 had been filed by the petitioner’s father Chandar Yadav which was decreed by the judgment dated 11.3.1998 declaring the title and confirmation of possession in favour of the plaintiff petitioner’s father over the land in question as against the defendant Maluki Yadav whose son-in-law is the informant in the present case. It is thus submitted that there was no occasion for the petitioner and the other co-accused persons to be the aggressors in the present matter. 2 It is further submitted that the only allegation against the petitioner is that he caught hold of informant’s father- in-law Maluki Yadav and there is no allegation of having fired or caused any injury upon him. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal history. Learned counsel further points out that the petitioner is in jail for more than one year five months since 14.7.2009. On a consideration of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner Sunil Yadav is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC 1, Munger, in Sessions Trial No. 615/09 arising out of Sangrampur P.S.case No. 34/09. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) Spal/