IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47971 of 2008 KUNDAN MAHTO @ MITHILESH KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 02/12/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case under Sections- 302, 307, 147, 148, 149, 447 and 435 of I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act. The submission is that the petitioner is a Panchayat Teacher and on the date of occurrence was involved in Government activities under a Government scheme with regard to preparation of list of B.P.L. beneficiaries between 11.06.2007 to 9.7.2007 and that he has given a representation to the investigating officer also in this regard stating that he was part of a team. Since the defence of the petitioner rests on performance of certain official duties for which records shall easily be available as also evidence of the members of the team, considering that the petitioner is not alleged to be the assailant and urges false implication, let the petitioner named above surrender before the court below within four weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail during the period of 2 investigation, till submission of charge-sheet upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand )along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No.156 of 2007, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. The aspect of the petitioner being a member of a Government inspection team, quite naturally is required to engage the attention of the investigating officer. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)