// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6988/2007 Abdul Gani Haji Leelagar S/o Shri Basarat Ali Versus Ramswaroop Nai S/o Shri Sagarmal Nai Date of Order ::: 28.07.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Anil Kumar Tailor, Advocate, for Shri N.K. Mishra, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ petition, on behalf of the plaintiff, is directed against the impugned order dated 31st July, 2007 passed by the trial court whereby his application for closing the written-statement of the defendant has been rejected. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the defendant was served with the summon on 6th January, 2006 and he appeared in the trial court on 9th February, 2006 but he did not file his written- statement within a period of of 30 days or within a period of 90 days, therefore, his // 2 // right to file the written-statement be closed. The application was contested by the defendant explaining the reasons for not filing the written-statement at an early date. It was also contended that he has already filed his written-statement on 3rd June, 2006. The learned trial court dismissed the application of the plaintiff and passed an order that the written-statement filed by the defendant is taken on the record. I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in the impugned order so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in the writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//