IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10035 of 2005 Between: 1 Kantu Mallaiah, S/o.Thirupathaiah, R/o.B.Annaram village, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda Dist. 2 Kantu Pitchaiah, S/o.Thirupathaiah, R/o.B.Annaram village, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda Dist. 3 Dhanavath Badru, S/o.Late Hanuman, R/o.B.Annaram village, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda Dist. 4 Dhanavath Devojee, S/o.Hanuman, R/o.B.Annaram village, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda Dist. 5 Kantu Ganga Raju, S/o.Late Bizamaiah, R/o.B.Annaram village, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda Dist. 6 Chavala LIngamma, W/o.Gopaiah, R/o.B.Annaram village, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda Dist. 7 Kantu Venkaiah, S/o.Bixamaiah, R/o.B.Annaram village, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda Dist. ... PETITIONERS AND 1 Land Acquisition officer, & Spl.Dy.Collector, AMR preject (aliminate Madhava Reddy Project) Gandhavarigudem, Nalgonda District. 2 Special Collector, SRSP, AMR project HUDA Complex, Tarnaka, Secunderabad. 3 Executive Egineer, R&B Miryalaguda Nalgonda Dist. 4 Government of A.P. rep.by its Secretary, Irrigation (I&CAD), Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. ....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.L.PRABHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : O R D E R: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition itself is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not depositing the compensation amounts, in terms of the judgment and decree dated 17-03-2003 in A.S. No.1830 of 2002, together with statutory benefits as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, Sri L.Prabhakar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that after this case came up for hearing on 04-09-2006, the respondents have deposited a part of the decretal amount. He further stated that the petitioners will be satisfied if the civil Court in which E.P.No.4 of 2004 is pending is directed to dispose of the E.P expeditiously to enable the petitioners to realize the decretal amount in full. As I find this request of the learned counsel reasonable, the writ petition is disposed of and the learned Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda is directed to dispose of E.P.No.4 of 2004, if not already disposed of, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP No.13020 of 2005 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Dated 18th June, 2008 Note: Copy of this order shall be sent to Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda. vrn