1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (s) NO.775 /2011 in SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 12250 /2011 (Keshav s/o Shriram Vidhate and another vs. Motiram Bombolkar (Dead ) Through LRs) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. V S Kukday, Adv. for appellant/applicant Mr Desai,Adv.for respondent. CORAM : A.B.CHAUDHARI,J. DATED : 20th September,2011. Heard. In view of the pendency of Review Application before the District Court, in my opinion, there are good and sufficient grounds for condoning the delay of one year 39 days which is caused in filing the present Second Appeal. Delay condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs. 500/- to the counsel for respondent. Counsel for the respondents submits that the subject- matter of the Second Appeal was remanded on as many as four occasions and the respondents got success every time. Thus, he submitted that the instant Second Appeal itself be decided finally so as to end the litigation one way or the other. The request is accepted. 2 Place the Second Appeal at the end of the Board on 5 th October, 2011 at 2.30 p.m. Call R & P. In the meanwhile, parties to maintain status quo. JUDGE sahare