1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.811/2007 (Ramji Das & Ors. Vs. State& Anr.) Date of Order : 23rd October, 2007 HON'BLE MR. H.R. PANWAR, J. Mr. H.R. Chawla for petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, P.P. By the instant criminal misc petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has challenged the order dated 19.05.2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sri Karanpur, District Sri Ganganagar (for short `the revisional court') whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioners against the order dated 23.02.2006 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sri Karanpur, District Sri Ganganagar (for short `the trial court') was dismissed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the orders passed by the courts below. 2 By a well reasoned and detailed order dated 23.02.2006 which runs into five pages, the learned trial court took note of each and every facts and prima facie came to the conclusion that there are sufficient ground to take cognizance against the petitioner for the offences under Sections 341, 323 and 379 IPC and accordingly took cognizance of the said offences and issued process. On the revision against the order dated 23.02.2006 passed by the learned trial court, the revisional court did not find any reason to interfere with the same and affirmed the findings arrived at by the trial court. Both the courts below currently found a case against the accused petitioners. In my view, it cannot be said that the impugned orders would result in serious miscarriage of justice or abuse of the process of the Court warranting any interference under the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. The petitioner has already availed remedy of one revision as envisaged under Section 397 Cr.P.C. and in the grab of petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks to avail remedy of second revision, which is barred by Section 397(3) Cr.P.C. 3 The instant criminal misc. petition is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R. PANWAR), J. vij