IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 4913 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision : 25.9.2007 U.H.B.V.Nigam & Anr. ..........Petitioners Versus M/s Satpal & Sons Rice and General Mills & Ors. ......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present : Mr.Jagdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. **** VINOD K. SHARMA, J. (ORAL) The present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 22.9.2006 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Karnal granting injunction in favour of the plaintiff respondents against recovery of amount claimed on the allegations that they were committing theft of electricity. It was conceded before the learned Courts below that matter with regard to the tampering of meter was still under consideration as the meter was yet to be sent to the manufacturer. The other evidence brought on record did not justify the allegation of theft. In view of this, the learned Courts below have held that there was a prima facie case in favour of the plaintiff respondents and that plaintiffs/ respondents would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction as prayed for was not granted. Consequently, the learned lower appellate Court allowed the injunction application moved by the plaintiffs respondent. C.R. No. 4913 of 2007 (O&M) -2- The impugned order does not suffer from any jurisdictional error which may call for interference by this Court in revisional jurisdiction. Dismissed. 25.9.2007 ( VINOD K. SHARMA ) 'sp' JUDGE