1 BA 1053 OF 2011 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1053 OF 2011 Mr. Naim Abdul Shakur Kacchi .. Applicant -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. Shekhar Ingawale, for the applicant. Mrs. M. R. Tidke, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 22nd December, 2011 P.C. 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a scrap dealer, who claims to be dealing with Cast Iron Scrap and not C.R.C. scrap, is alleged to have received scrap of C.R.C. worth Rs.6,71,820/- which was sold by co-accused. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has not received any such scrap. All the same, to show his bonafides and without prejudice to his defence, applicant would deposit within a period of four weeks a sum of Rs.6,71,820/- with the learned trial Magistrate, which amount the learned trial Magistrate shall invest in the interest earning deposits in the State Bank of India. In view of this the presence of applicant may not be necessary. Therefore, in the event of applicant's 2 BA 1053 OF 2011 arrest in C.R. No.463 of 2011, registered with Kalamboli Police Station, Navi Mumbai, he be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs.25,000/-, on the following conditions :- i) The applicant shall deposit within a period of four weeks a sum of Rs.6,71,820/- with the learned trial Magistrate, which amount the learned trial Magistrate would invest in the interest earning deposits in the State Bank of India, and shall deal with the same at the end of the trial as per result of the trial. On applicant's failure to deposit the entire amount within the stipulated period, order shall stand revoke. ii) The applicant shall make himself available on 28th December, 2011 at 11.00 a.m. for interrogation by the Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required by the Investigating Officer. iii) The applicant shall also furnish his mobile telephone number and address and other details to the investigating officer. iv) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; v) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. vi) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of 3 BA 1053 OF 2011 Maharashtra and ors, reported in A.I. R. 2011 (SC) 312. vii) The application stands disposed of . (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)