IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34088 of 2010 1. SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH 2. Mritunjay Kumar Singh 3. Balbir Singh 4. Atul Kumar Singh Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 04.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Theft is said ornamental. For the offence under Section 3(I)(x) of the S.C/S.T (prevention of atrocities) Act, it is said that the same is leveled against petitioner no.3 only and now, parties have compromised resolving their differences. Placed circumstances entitle the petitioners for bail except petitioner no.3, who is alleged for abuse in name of informant’s caste. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioners no. 1, 2 and 4 is allowed and at the same time, prayer of petitioner no.3 is rejected. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Singhia P.S. Case No. 08 of 2008 above named petitioners no. 1, 2 and 4 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Rosera, Samastipur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. However, petitioner no.3 is directed to surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail which shall be decided on the same day without being prejudiced by this rejection order 2 considering the compromise in between the parties. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)