FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4428 OF 2009 Shiney Suraj Ahuja V/s. State of Maharashtra _____________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court s orders : ’ or directions and Registrar s’ : Court s or Judge s orders ’ ’ orders : _____________________________________________________________________________________ Mr.Shrikant Shivde & M.S.Mohite for applicant Mrs.P.P.Bhosale, APP CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 27th JANUARY, 2010. PC :- 1. Heard. 2. The application made by the applicant accused to supply him with documents and more particularly, the copies of the communication/ letter addressed by the Investigating Officer to the Medical Officer and concerned Forensic Laboratory, copies of the register in which record is maintained about receipt and despatch of the materials analysed by DNA Experts and further data including photos, documents etc. in relation to the DNA Test. 3. Such an application was made and it is common ground that the learned APP appearing in the case had specifically stated before the trial court that the State has no objection to the documents being supplied as prayed. 4. Yet, the learned Judge has rejected the application. 5. It is not necessary to go into all contentions including as to whether the learned Judge could have rejected the application at this stage or whether his view that such an application lies at a later stage, is correct or not because it is agreed before me that copies of the above documents will be supplied to the applicant accused at his own costs within fifteen days from today. The said documents be provided within 15 days and on ensuring the same are supplied, the learned Judge to proceed and frame charges. Application disposed of. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.)