IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 5TH OCTOBER 2010 / 13TH ASWINA 1932 RP.No. 830 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.13860/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS IN WP --------------------------------------- 1. BINOY JOSEPH, AGED 32, S/O. JOSEPH, VLIYAMURUTHANGAL HOUSE, ANGAMALY KARA, ANGAMALY TALUK. 2. AJITH C.NAIR, AGED 31, S/O. CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR, MULAMKUNNATH HOUSE, ANGAMALY KARA, ANGAMALY TALUK. 3. RAJI SHAJU, W/O. SHAJU, AGED 36, THEKKEL AIROOKKARAN HOUSE, PADMAPURAM.P.O, KARUKUTTY, ANGAMALY. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT IN WP ------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, RESUVEY DISTRICT OFFICE, KAKKANAD. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF SURVEY, ERNAKULAM, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD. 4. ANTONY, S/O. MATHAI, PULLAN HOUSE, NADUVATTOM KARA, MALAYATTOOR VILLAGE. 5. REV. FATHER PAUL CHULLY, VIKAR,ST. ANTONY'S ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, NADUVATTOM, MALAYATTOOR VILLAGE. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.ANTONY MUKKATH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== R.P.No. 830/2010 in W.P.(C).No. 13860/2007 ================== Dated this the 5th day of October, 2010 O R D E R The petitioners in this review petition seek review of my judgment dated 6.8.2010 in W.P.(C).No.13860/2007. One of the grounds urged is that on the date of hearing, the counsel for the petitioners could not be present and, therefore, the counsel could not place arguments of the petitioners on record. Taking a lenient view, I allow the review petition and recall my judgment dated 6.8.2010. Post the writ petition along with S.A.No.748/1998. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge