IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.10057 of 2009 UDAI CHAMAR, SON OF YADUNANDAN RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BASDIHA, P.O. HARIHARGANJ, P.S. KUTUMBA, DISTRICT AURANGABAD……………………..PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………………OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2. 01.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears for the State. This case is misuse of privilege of bail. It is stated that the petitioner was not named in the first information report and he was implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused. Earlier he was granted bail by the Court but thereafter he did not appear in the case and his bail bond was cancelled. After he came to know about the cancellation of his bail, he surrendered to the court on 15.10.2008 and since then he is in custody. It is stated that the petitioner is a labourer and he had gone out of station to earn his livelihood and so, he left pairvi of the case to a clerk of the court who did not take any prompt step in this regard. Considering the fact that the petitioner is a labourer and he remained in custody for about six months, the application is allowed. Petitioner (Udai Chamar) is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten - 2 - thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in connection with Sessions Trial No.214/98/120/99 arising out of Aurangabad Town P.S. case No.26/98, subject to the condition that he will attend the court on each and every date personally and co-operate in the trial failing which the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bond and take steps for his arrest. B.T (J.N Singh, J)