M/V (. IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR First ApnealNg. '2'#/0 law Qiv'as'im‘g Beaak / I APPELLANTS Rain Singh s/o Late Bharau Vishwakarma, aged about 50 years, caste- Lohar. Mongra Bai w/o Rain Singh Vishwakarma, aged about 45 years, caste- Lohar. Dinesh s / o Rain Singh Vishwakarma, aged about 23 years, caste— Lohar. Minor Ravikishan s/o Rain Singh Vishwakarma, aged about 11 years, caste — Lohar, Minor Ku. Tripti Vishwakarma D/o Rain Singh Vishwakarma, aged about 14 years, caste- Lohar, Minor Appellant No. 4, 8r, 5 are represented by their natural guardian 8a Father Appellant No. 1 Rain Singh All R/o Village Majarkatta, Thana 85 Tahsil‘ Gariyaband, District Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS )1. Chetan Yadav s/o Late Ram Lal Yadav, R/o near High School, Gariyaband, Thana 8r, Tahsil Gariyaband, Diatrict Raipur (C.G.). 2. Chhattisgarh Electricity Board, through President/ Chief Engineer / Executive Engineer Office, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Executive Engineer/ Junior " Engineer, ,Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Branch Office Gariyaband, Thana Gariyaband, District Raipur (C.G.). ' 4. State of Chhattistgarh, through Collector, Raipur, District Raipur' RESPONDENTS ' (c.G.). 5. Birjhu s/o Dwarika Prasad Sahu, aged about 29 years R/o MaJarkatta Thana Garlyaband Dlstrlct Ra1pur (C (z ) MEMO OF APPEAL UNDER SSECTION 96 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE QODE mmmw IDB: Hon’ble Mr. T.P. Shaxma Hon’ble Mr. N.K. Aggwgl, JJ‘_ 24/02/2010 None fOr thc appellants. .Shri AShish Shukla, G.A. Nbne appears on behalf c called out for 3rd time h6aring. ‘ option is left exCept to dismiss 1 ‘ Accordingly, the Fixst ap} ‘No order as to costs. Sd/- ‘ ’ 'T-‘P- Sharma : JUdge for the State] respondent NO. 4. f the appellants when the First appeal is In absence of representation on behalf of the appellants. No ihe First appeal for want of prosecution. )eal is dismissed for want of prosecution. f Sdl- N.K. AGARWAL Judge / / /’