@ @ $§§§€i§i§ $§§§§$H IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHATTISHGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. w.P.(S)No......E39. .......2011 Cg: ‘Hw’//q / PETITIONERS 1. Radheshyam Verma S/oTejramverma Age 58 Years, Head-Master, Govt. Primary School, Kunda Block Arang, Distric Raipur C.G. / 2. Shyam Sundar Bandhey , s/o Shri manglu ram Age 55 Years, LecturerL, Govt. Middle School, Kosrangi Block Arang, , / Distt. Raipur C.G. 3 Shantanu Banjare S/o Jhadu das Banjare 61years headmaster Primary School Nara Post Thansoj / Block Arang Distric Raipur (C.G) 4 Ramadhar Ghidore s/o Chandulal Ghidore 55years Headmaster Primary School Nara Block Arang District Raipur (CG) Smt Dhanrnat Gaikvgard w/o Nilkanth, age 5876Headmaster Primary School Nagpura, Block Arang Distric Raipur (C.G) Bhu’wanlal Sangsurtan s/o Bhaiyalal, Ag655 years Headmaster Middleschool nagargaon, Block Dharsiva , District Raipur (C.G) Awadhram Verma S/o Sujan Singh Verma Age 6O years Upper Division Te/acher/ Govt / Balak Middlle School, Mandir Hasaud,D&Ir%/}’ (C.G) Chandu Prasad Tendon S/ O premlal60 years Headmaster Block Arang District Raipur (C.G) Kamtaprasad Banjare S/ogulabi Prasad, AgeSSyearsA Lecturer Higher Secondry School Bhansoj’ District Raipur (C.G) ® é) 10 BholaPrasad Chandrakar S/o romlal‘ age 61years/ HeadMaster Primary School Khamahriya, Block Arangpistrict Raipur (C.G) 11 Dhansai Chatur S/o Shyamratan chatur,Age 55 years , Upper Division Teacher; Govt High School ’I‘ulsi. Baradera , Dharsiva Raipur (C.G) 12Hemraj Gilhare S/o kartikram, Age 55 Govt Primaly School Dhansuli Block Arang, District Raipur (C.G) 13Dinkar Das Manilpuri (Panka) S/o Mukhi das '54 years Upper Division Teacher Block Arang District Raipur (C.G) 1 4Pardeshi Rain Verma S / O l a 9 k a? kejauram Age55 years Upper Division Teacher Block Arang District Raipur (C.G) VERSUS (1T The State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Through — The Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (CTG.) /. (2) District Education officer Raipur C.G. RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR MANDAMUSIDIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. RESPONDENS W @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1090 of2011 PETITIONER : Radheshyam Verma & Others VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & Another. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agniho’tri, J. K.“ Present: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. ‘ Shri Y.S.Thalmr, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ‘ ORDER ORAL l. (Passed on 25 day of February, 201 I) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation in the light of circular dated 05,01201 I, passed by the Government of Chhattisgarh, School Education Department. 2.‘ Learned counsel appearing for other side has no obj ection. 3. No permission ofthis Court is required to make representation to the respondent authorities. Thus, such direction cannot be issued. However, ifthe petitioners make a representation to the respondent authorities, the same may be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits and perspective. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is dismissed. Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge