IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4122 of 2007 INDRADEO BHAKT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02/ 18.02.2010 Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh for the petitioner, Mr. Jainendra Kumar Sinha, assisting counsel to G.A. 10 for the State and Mr. Sanjay Kumar for the Accountant General are present. Learned counsel for the petitioner admits to the redressal of the grievance of the petitioner as set out in the writ petition save and except the grievance relating to payment of arrears for the period 1996 to 2006. Learned counsel for the State does not dispute the claim of the petitioner for payment of arrears of salary but submits that the petitioner himself has not clarified the exact period for which he is claiming the arrears of salary. Learned counsel thus submits that if the petitioner files a representation indicating the period in question, the same should be considered and disposed of and the amount admissible to the petitioner would be paid. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions, this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the respondent no. 3, the District Superintendent of Education, Muzaffarpur setting out his claim for arrears of salary together with 2 supportive details as required by the respondents and which representation of the petitioner would be considered and disposed of by the concerned respondent in accordance with law and the admissible amount of the arrears of salary would be paid to him within three months from the date of filing of such representation. The writ petition stands disposed of. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)