1 CR.APL NO.904/2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 2. APPLN/904/2011 PARASRAM @ VIKY EKNATH GHODESWAR [Criminal] V/S THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.G.Chapalgaonkar, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. K.M.Suryavanshi, APP for State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:24/3/2011 ... 1. Heard. The accused/applicant, in custody from 10th April, 2010, on the accusations for infraction of Sections 363, 366, 376 of IPC, seeks bail basically on the ground of ill- health of his mother. 2. Learned Counsel submits, two other associates of the accused are released by this Court and, consequently, same scale could be applied for releasing the accused. 3. Release of two accused was specifically as their involvement in the sexual abuse was not demonstrated. The victim, a 13 2 CR.APL NO.904/2011 years old girl, pointed finger to the accused, known to her, having dragged her, took her aside in bushes, ravished her against her wish. Prima facie, the accused knew that the victim is a teenager and against all odds, succeeded in his act. 4. While dealing with Application No.367/2011 of Yogesh and another, this Court has recorded that on earlier occasion, the learned Sessions Judge was directed to complete the trial as far as possible within a period of six months by order dt.24th August, 2010. By the above referred order, the learned Sessions Judge was reminded of earlier directions. 5. It is informed, charge is framed and matter is posted for evidence. Learned Sessions Judge will ensure to complete the trial in the time frame. Application lacks merit, dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/904-11crapl