1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10887 of 2011-I Decided on: 15th December, 2011. Ratan Lal, S/o late Sh. Nand Lal, R/o Sharma Bhawan, Near Durga Temple, Kelti, P.O. Kelti, Tehsil and District Shimla (HP). ......Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Himachal Pradesh through Secretary (Education) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-2. 2. District Education Officer, Shimla. 3. The Principal Sr. Sec. School Dansa, Distt. Shimla, H.P. .....Respondents. Civil Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India seeking issuance of appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents in the facts and circumstances of the case. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. B.S. Ranjan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. 2 Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the alleged order of termination from service as Laboratory Attendant, while working under the third respondent. It is something happened in the year 1998. In case the petitioner has still any grievance left, he may approach the second respondent, so as to ascertain as to what was the mode of appointment and why the appointment has been terminated, in which case, the second respondent will look into the matter and take appropriate action, in accordance with law. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 15th December, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/hl) Judge.