IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14410 of 2009 1. KITABUDDIN ANSARI S/O ISUF ANSARI VILL- PHULWARIA, P.S-PHULWARIA, DISTT- GOPALGANJ. .... Petitioner. Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 2. THE CHAIRMAN BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER- ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION DIVISION, ARAR MORE, GOPALGANJ, DISTT- GOPALGANJ. 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GOPALGANJ. ... Respondents with CWJC No.14459 of 2009 1. VINDHYACHAL CHOUDHUR S/O DAMODAR CHOUDHUR R/O VILL- PHULWARIA, P.S- PHULWARIA, DISTT- GOPALGANJ. ... Petitioener Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THROUGH THE CHAIRMAN, BIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 2. CHAIRMAN BIHAR STATE ELECCTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER-ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION DIVISION ARAR MOR, GOPALGANJ, DISTT-GOPALGANJ, 4. THE DISTRICT MGISTRATE , GOPALGANJ. .... Respondents. ----------- 2 4.12.2009 These two writ petitions raise an issue of violation of human rights at the hands of the Electricity Board. Two persons were going on a bicycle when high tension cable of the Bihar State Electricity Board broken and both were electrocuted on the spot. Prima facie, the reports of the authorities themselves accept this fact. Petitioners, who are dependent have been moving the authorities for fixing responsibility and for just and adequate compensation for untimely demise of their bread earners by ,prima facie, act of 2 negligence violating their rights. It is submitted that denial of compensation in such an event is direct infringement to Human Rights In my view, in this summary jurisdiction there may be difficulty in adjudicating upon basic fact. The State Human Rights Commission has adequate machinery and provision to make all such enquiry and decide the issue including recommendation with regard to grant of compensation. That, in the facts of the present case, would be a more appropriate forum for the petitioner to agitate the matter. I, therefore, direct the petitioner of both the writ petitions to make appropriate applications before the State Human Rights Commission, which would deal with it in accordance with law for redressal of grievances and complaints of the petitioners at the earliest possible. In view of these observations, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw these applications to move State Human Rights Commission . Leave is granted and the writ petitions are accordingly permitted to be withdrawn. Singh (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)