1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1547/2006 (Jeevan Ram Vs. State & Ors.) Date of order : 20.5.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. V.D. Vyas, for the petitioner. Mr. Shyam Ladrecha, Govt. Counsel. In this case, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of order dated 6.6.2005 (Annexure-5) as well as the consequential order dated 5.7.2005 (Annexure-6). The Director Director, Sanskrit Education, Rajasthan, Jaipur vide order dated 6.6.2005 while modifying the order dated 27.10.1999 has ordered to forfeit the period of service of petitioner commencing from 12.2.1993 to 29.7.1997. The contention of the petitioner is that earlier after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner order dated 27.10.1999 Annexure-2 was passed by which the period of service commencing from 2 27.9.1996 to 29.7.1997 was forfeited and without any notice to the petitioner and contrary to law, the said order has been modified vide impugned order dated 6.6.2005. So also, the order which has been passed against the petitioner in the year 1999 cannot be reviewed after expiry of six years without assigning any reasons. Therefore, the order impugned dated 6.6.2005 is per se illegal and have no foundation to stand before eye of law because there is no provision to review the order passed by the competent authority upon the same charge after expiry of seven years. In this view of the matter, the order dated 6.6.2005 Annexure-5, which is not sustainable before eye of law, is hereby set aside, so also, the consequential order dated 5.7.2005 Annexure-6 is also set aside while upholding the order dated 27.10.1999 Annexure-2. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to grant all the consequential benefits to the petitioner as a result of quashing of order dated 6.6.2005 withing a period of three months from today. No order as to costs. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun