IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI TUESDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2009 / 26TH JYAISHTA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 421 of 2009() ---------------------------- OP.136/2006 of FAMILY COURT,KOZHIKODE .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT : ---------------------------- V.M.ZUHARABI, D/O MAMMAD KOYA, NADUVILAKAM HOUSE, P.O.ARAKINAR, MATHOTTAM, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN SMT.BINDU GEORGE RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: ----------------------------- C.V.HASSAN KOYA, S/O IMBICHI MAMMU, NADUVILAKAM VEEDU, NADUVATTAM AMSOM DESOM, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SMT.P.K.RADHIKA THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. -------------------------------------------------- Mat.Appeal No.421 OF 2009 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 16th DAY OF JUNE, 2009 J U D G M E N T Basant, J. This appeal is directed against an order passed by the Family Court, wherein the respondent/petitioner/husband was declared to be having exclusive right, title and ownership over the petition schedule property. The appellant herein and her men were restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from causing obstruction to the respondent from entering into the petition schedule property and from interfering with his possession and enjoyment over the same. 2. When this appeal came up for admission, the respondent/husband has entered appearance. It is reported that the parties have settled their disputes amicably after the impugned order was passed by the Family Court. A joint statement duly signed by the rival contestants and counter signed by their counsel has been filed. It is reported that the settlement was reached on the basis of Annexure A agreement Mat.A.No.421/09 -2- between the parties. Both parties and their counsel have prayed in the joint statement that this appeal may be allowed and the impugned order passed in O.P.No.136/06 may be set aside. 3. We are satisfied that the joint statement of compromise can be accepted and this appeal can be allowed. 4. In the result, (a) this appeal is allowed. (b) the impugned order is set aside accepting the joint statement and Annexure A agreement annexed to the joint statement. (c) the joint statement and Annexure A agreement shall be appended to this appellate judgment. R.BASANT, JUDGE. M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE. dsn