HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.1398 of 2011 O R D E R: The petitioner/A.1 is accused of offences punishable under Section 498-A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The 2nd respondent is wife of the petitioner. Their marriage took place on 04.08.2001. It is alleged that at the time of marriage engagement on 26.04.2001, parents of the 2nd respondent paid Rs.5,00,000/- in cash, gold ring and chain to A.1’s family and that in addition to the same 400 grams of gold, 3 kgs of silver and cash of Rs.2,00,000/- were paid to parents of A.1 and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- was paid for household articles. The allegations further read that A.1 demanded the 2nd respondent to get money from her father and sent her away demanding her to sell her Flat at Old Boinpally and get money. Apart from the said demands, allegations are made against A.1 about harassment of the 2nd respondent in other ways. Therefore, it cannot be said that there is no triable case against A.1. It is contended by the petitioner’s counsel that the 2nd respondent came up with the present report to the police after A.1 obtained injunction order from Family Court in O.P.No.389 of 2009 preventing ICICI Bank to deliver property documents to the 2nd respondent. It shows that there is bitterness between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent since prior to giving of report by the 2nd respondent to the police alleging the above offences. It cannot be concluded at this stage that the present report is given by the 2nd respondent as a counter-blast for the order obtained by A.1 from Family Court. There are no grounds to interfere with trial of this case insofar as A.1 is concerned. Hence, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. _______________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU,J Dt.22nd December, 2011 PNV