IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 62 OF 2005 (S/S) Dalip Singh Negi ……………..Petitioner. Versus State of Uttaranchal & Ors. ….Respondents. Mr. M.C. Kandpal, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned counsel for the respondents. 25th September, 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 6.1.2005 passed by the Commissioner Garhwal Mandal, Pauri contained in Annexure No. 6 to the writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer to the extent that the petitioner’s representation, which is contained in Annexure No. R.A. 7 to the Rejoinder Affidavit may be disposed of only by which the petitioner has claimed the promotion to the post of Naib Tehsildar, which is a promotional post under Clause 4 of Rule 5 of the U.P. Subordinate Revenue Executive (Naib Tehsildar) Rules, 1944. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that he will have no objection, in vacation of the stay order in case representation is considered and 2 decided. Accordingly, stay order dated 19.1.2005 is vacated. 4. Petitioner is directed to submit the copy of the representation contained in Annexure No. R.A.7 to the Rejoinder Affidavit along with the copy of this order within a period of ten days. Thereafter, said representation of the petitioner shall be decided within a period of one month after receipt of the representation. 5. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of finally. (P.C. Verma, J.) 25.9.2008 Rathour