1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6281/2010 Kalyan Mal Jain Vs. Fakrudeein and Anr. DATE OF ORDER : 2.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J. Dr. P.S. Bhati, for the petitioner. By the order impugned, learned trial court rejected application seeking amendment in the written statement on the count that the facts now sought to be included are already available in written statement. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the facts regarding non-dependence of the landlord Razab Ali are not available on record and those are necessary to contest the issue of bonafide need of premises. I do not find any merit in the argument advanced. The respondent has entered into the litigation being legal heir of Razab Ali, and as such, he can very well press the 2 bonafide necessity of himself. The other facts are already available in the written statement, as such, the order impugned does not suffer from any error that may warrant interference of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. RM/