IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39644 of 2009 1. MIYAN CHAUDHARY 2. JARSI CHAUDHARY 3. AJAY CHAUDHARY 4. BHAJJU CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 20-11-2009 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners, namely, Miyan Chaudhary, Jarsi Chaudhary, Ajay Chaudhary and Bhajju Chaudhary are accused in Kashichak P.S. Case No. 31 of 2009 for offences punishable under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Substance of allegation as set out in the F.I.R. is that these petitioners had jointly committed the unnatural death of the informant’s daughter who was married to the brother of the petitioner nos. 1 to 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioner nos. 1 to 3 are the brothers of the husband of the deceased whereas petitioner no. 4 is the uncle of the husband of the deceased. Learned counsel with reference to the statement made in the F.I.R. submits that except of the direct allegation made against the husband of the deceased of causing death of the daughter of the informant by assaulting her on the head by means of ‘Balaitha’, no specific - 2 - allegation has been spelt out against either of these petitioners and that they have been roped in the present case merely because they happen to be either brothers or the uncle of the husband of the deceased. Learned counsel thus submits that the allegations are general and omnibus and that no offence is made out against these petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances set forth, let petitioners, namely, Miyan Chaudhary, Jarsi Chaudhary, Ajay Chaudhary and Bhajju Chaudhary be released on bail upon each one of them individually furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Kashichak P.S. Case No. 31 of 2009. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)