((-1-)) MST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.183 OF 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, Court’s or appearances, Court’s Judge’s order orders or directions & Registrar’s orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr.P.J.Pawar for applicant. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 28th March 2007 PC : 1. The impugned judgement and order records that the Trial Court dismissed the suit filed by the petitioner on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. A regular appeal against the decree dismissing the suit was filed by the petitioner in the District Court which has been dismissed. 2. Learned advocate for the petitioner states that a second appeal ought to have been preferred against the impugned decree. He, therefore, ((-2-)) MST seeks permission to withdraw this revision application with liberty to file appropriate proceedings. Revision application is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such with liberty as prayed for. (A.S.OKA, J.)