IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Writ Appeal No. 788 of 2008 And Writ Petition No.18278 of 2000 Writ Appeal No. 788 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 20/06/2008 in Writ Petition No.18278 of 2000 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Smt Mirapa Suguna W/o Late Gopaludu R/o Jonnagudi, Vizianagaram ... APPELLANT AND 1) The Dy. Inspector of Police Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2) The Inspector General of Police, Visakhapatnam. 3) The Superintendent of Police, Vizianagaram. 4) S V V Prasad Rao Sub-Inspector of Police, I-Town Police Station, Vizianagaram. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: MR.B.SESIBUSHAN RAO Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for Respondent No.4: MR.C. SADASIVA REDDY Writ Petition No.18278 of 2000 Between: Smt Mirapa Suguna W/o Late Gopaludu R/o Jonnagudi, Vizianagaram ... PETITIONER AND 1) The Dy. Inspector of Police Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2) The Inspector General of Police, Visakhapatnam. 3) The Superintendent of Police, Vizianagaram. 4) S V V Prasad Rao Sub-Inspector of Police I-Town Police Station, Vizianagaram. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in refusing to grant sanction to prosecute the 4th Respondent vide proceedings No. C.No.1596/A- 3/Petn./99 dt. 31/8/2000 as arbitrary, illegal, null and void and to set aside the same and to issue a consequential direction to the 1st Respondent authority to issue a sanction letter to the petitioner ton prosecute the 4th Respondent in the private complaint D.D.R.No. 3398/1998 ﬁled by the petitioner on the ﬁle of the Addl. J.F.C.M., Vizianagaram and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem ﬁt and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.RATNA SAGAR Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4: MR.C.SADASIVA REDDY The Court made the following: Judgment: (Per Shri Anil R. Dave, Chief Justice) Learned advocate for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal as well as writ petition so as to enable the appellant – petitioner to approach the State Government to obtain necessary sanction for prosecution of respondent No.4 under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Permission granted. Writ appeal as well as Writ Petition No.18278 of 2000 stands disposed of as withdrawn. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ August 06, 2008 R. SUBHASH REDDY, J svs ........REGISTRAR To 1. 2.2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WA {MUK}