CRP 436/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. T.H. Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. S. Shyam, l earned counsel appearing for the respondent. The petitioner, who is the opposite party in Misc. Arbitration Case No.446/2011 has filed this petition challenging the order dated 12th December, 2011 passed b y the learned Additional District Judge, Kamrup at Guwahati. By the said order, the learned Additional District Judge, in view of the order of status-quo passe d on 1st October, 2011 refused to pass any order in the petition filed by the pr esent petitioners, which has been registered and numbered as Misc. Case No.557/2 011. The respondent has filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and C onciliation Act, 1996 (in short, the Act ), which has been registered and number ed as Misc. Arbitration Case No.446/2011 praying for an interim order. The Addit ional District Judge, upon hearing the learned counsel for the applicant and upo n perusal of the averments made in the application was pleased to pass an order of status-quo on 1st October, 2011 while issuing notice. The present petitioner s thereafter, entered appearance and filed an application for vacation and/or cl arification of the aforesaid order of status-quo dated 1st October, 2011, which was registered and numbered as Misc. (J) Case No.557/2011. The learned Addition al District Judge, however, upon hearing the learned counsel appearing for the p arties vide order dated 12th December, 2011 has refused to entertain the said ap plication on the ground that an order of status-quo has been passed. To a pointed query made, Mr. Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioners has s ubmitted that apart from the application filed in Misc. Case No.557/2011, the pe titioners intend to file an objection against the prayer made under Section 9 of the Act, which would be file on the next date fixed, i.e. on 23rd December, 201 1. Since the petitioners are going to file an objection against the prayer made und er Section 9 of the Act, the present petition is disposed of directing the learn ed Additional District Judge, Kamrup at Guwahati to consider the said objection alongwith the petition filed in Misc. Case No.557/2011 and hear the parties imme diately on reopening of the winter vacation on 3rd January, 2012 and to pass nec essary order in accordance with law. The respondents may, by 23rd December, 201 1, file objection to the petition filed in Misc. Case No.557/2011. The revision petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.