IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH : HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST (1ST) DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Crl.P.No.11979 of 2010 & Crl.P.No.12021 of 2010 Crl.P.No.11979 of 2010: Between: P. Madhukumar & others … Petitioners And: The State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of A.P., Hyderabad & another … Respondents Crl.P.No.12021 of 2010: Between: Hamid Dasthi … Petitioner And: The State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of A.P., Hyderabad & another … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Crl.P.No.11979 of 2010 & Crl.P.No.12021 of 2010 COMMON ORDER: The petitioners and 2nd respondent in both the matters present. Sri Syed Tousif Basha (learned counsel for the petitioners in Crl.P.No.11979 of 2010 and 2nd respondent in Crl.P.No.12021 of 2010) and Sri M. Amarnath, (Learned counsel for the petitioner in Crl.P.No.12021 of 2010 and 2nd respondent in Crl.P.No.11979 of 2010), are also present. 2. It is stated by both the parties that they have dissolved the disputes amicably outside the Court and entered into compromise and executed Memorandum of Understanding, the copy of which is placed on record. In pursuance of the compromise, both the parties are withdrawing the respective complaints given by them to the police against one another. Both parties have further stated that in view of the compromise, they are no longer interested in prosecuting the matters. 3. Having regard to the fact that the disputes have been settled out side the Court and both parties have entered into memorandum of understanding and both parties are no more interested in prosecuting criminal proceedings against each other, it is considered that no useful purpose would be served by continuing further proceedings in Cr.No.449 of 2010 and Cr.No.450 of 2010 of PS Bowenpally. It is therefore considered a fit case to invoke inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash further proceedings in Cr.No.449 of 2010 of PS Bowenpally, against the petitioners in Crl.P.No.11979 of 2010 and further proceedings in Cr.No.450 of 2010 of PS Bowenpally, against the petitioner in Crl.P.No.12021 of 2010. 4. In the circumstances, further proceedings in Cr.No.449 of 2010 of Bowenpally PS, against the petitioners in Crl.P.No.11979 of 2010 and further proceedings in Cr.No.450 of 2010 of PS Bowenpally, against the petitioner in Crl.P.No.12021 of 2010, are held liable to be quashed and are accordingly quashed. 5. In the result, both the criminal petitions are disposed of as stated above. ____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J Date: 01.12.2010 bss