IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8611 of 2009 1. MOHAMMAD ALLAUDDIN 2. JUBEDA @ BEGAM 3. JABED @ MD JAVED 4. MOHAMMAD AKIL …… petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.13397 of 2009 MOHAMMAD SAFIK Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 9.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the State and Mr. Vevekanand Singh No.1, learned counsel for the complainant. Both the applications for anticipatory bail arise out of Complaint Case No. 723 of 2008, have been heard together. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that though there was negotiation for marriage but the act which forced the petitioners to deny the marriage because of changing of bride but making the case serious, allegation of demand of dowry has been leveled which never can be based for petitioners’ arrest. I agree with the submission. The prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the facts of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No.723 of 2008, the above named five petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the - 2 - satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur (Bhabua), subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI