S S tl 'd- ^•SuSt C.^ISQ^- IN_THEmQH CO_URT OFLCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR c WRIT PETITION N0. . .^^>.Lf..OF 2009 PETITIONER -•y^^' .aft"'' ^" RESPONDENTS ?.L>^ cv .^1 l.ol y.es^ ^ G?^TUl €•?. E»i w iL 2] ^ •-Kenabhata Chhote, Tahsil Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: CoUector, Raigarb [ CG] Sub-Divisional OfBcer, Sarangarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Tahsildar, Sarangarh, Distt- Raigarh WR]T^E3'IT!ON UNDER ARTICLES 226 P THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ¥-- HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6<4RH: BILASPUR Sii^le Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. W. P. (0 No. 230 of 2007 Petitioner : Duryodhan Kotunr Versus Respondents State of Oihattisgar+i and others Present: Mr. Ashok Vaishnav, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Utkarsh Verma, Deputy ©ovemmentAdvocate for State/respondents. OR&ER (Passed on 14th Day of February. 2007} 1. Learned counsel appearing for 1+ie State/respondents submits that the application dated 12.7.2004 (Annexuce P/6) pending before the respondents-outhorities, shall be considered and decided, in accorckmce with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 2. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel oppearing for the respondents/State, learned counsel appearing for- the petitioner submits that nothing survives in this matter. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge Subhash