IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.3084 of 2000 Date of Decision.31.10.2012 Smt. Sona Devi widow of Prewn Chand son of Bal Kishan Dass, resident of Kaithal, District Kaithal .....Petitioner Versus Rama Kant and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner states that the revision petition has become infructuous having regard to the fact that the landlord has resorted yet another action for eviction for the same premise and the adjudication in this case is not necessary. 2. The revision petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE October 31, 2012 Pankaj*