m WWHIGH COURT OE JUDICA'A‘URE AT -LLASPU, Eggéé'i‘ilSQAiig Khiiash Klunar Vanna. I” sze- Late Paymal wring, Aged about 28 years3 R10—_ViHaga/Past~861u¢ Tghsil-Pamy Distt-Durg. a‘ Chhattisgarh, PETHIDNER VERSUS State of Chhaitisgarh, Thicugh—Secretary§ Dew, 0f Genera} Admiliistraticn, Mankalaya, Ragmg Chhattisgarh, Secretary, Depth 0f Watér Resaurces, D,K.S, Bhawan, Manaalgyag §?°i&§xe Mp1“, 9f CG. Madhya Pradesh, 9?“w...-""' wa‘“ $\\‘\ /’<n(’ 3 b0 Thmugh-Secretary, Deptt. of Water Resumes, v”\ Secretariat- Bhopal, MP, Executive Engineer, I’M/.1), No.1, Durg Digit Durg, Chhattisgarh; , Sub Divisional Officer, P.W,D,(B & C), Divi$ion- Patan, Digit 13mg Chhatiisgafh Limon of india, msugh—Direcmr, Departmgnt QfPsr-sannel, Training and Public Grievancas, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, Naw Delhi. EESPUNDENI‘S ‘ ’ ié§% 7‘ y ‘ f a @> (3 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI ETC. mm,“ ma§~w<—mT,. A, .w «A . a HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILA$PUR ‘N WRW PETITION NO. 4687 OF 2004 I‘ PETITIONER M Khilesh Kumar Verma Versus RESPONDENTS N I ) State of Chhattisgarh & Others? (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 0f the Constitution o! Singie Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K Agnihotri, :J. indie) f Shri Shri N.N. Pawan Roy, Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer Advocate fo forthe pétitinner. :7 l r the State. ORDER ORAL ‘ (Passed on this 29 " day of March, 201 O) V ‘Learned counsel appearing for the petitioe on instructn 7a....— it is ordered, as prayed for. Aocordingiy, the writ petition is dismissed-asg’ above-stated iiberty. wiihdrawn with the ; nr ios