IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No.20384 of 2010 Date of Decision:8.9.2011 Sukhwant Singh .... Petitioner Versus Union of India and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.C. Pathela, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The petitioner herein is seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to make any recovery for the period from 2003-2008 as well as to grant all consequential benefits as per the scheme operative prior to the General Insurance (Rationalization of Pay Scales and other conditions of Service of Development Staff) Amendment Scheme, 2003. While issuing notice of motion, learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon CWP No.4571 of 2009. Written statement on behalf of respondents No.3 and 4 has been filed submitting therein that the writ petition i.e. CWP No.4571 of 2009 involving the same question of law stands decided on 27.5.2011 and a copy of the said judgment has been placed on record as Annexure R-3/1. The counsel in the said petition was also the same. C.W.P No.20384 of 2010 -2- After perusing the aforesaid order and judgment dated 27.5.2011 (Annexure R-3/1), this Court is satisfied that the matter is identical and is squarely covered by the said judgment. In view of the above, the present petition is also disposed of in the same terms as CWP No.4571 of 2009 decided on 27.5.2011 (Annexure R-3/1). 8.9.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE