R.S.A No. 2402 of 2008 ::1:: IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A No. 2402 of 2008 Date of decision : December 11, 2008. Smt. Sona Devi and others, ... Appellants. Versus Partap Singh and others, ... Respondent. *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate for the appellants. *** 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This appeal has been filed against concurrent judgments of both the Courts below dismissing the suit of the plaintiffs/appellants for injunction thereby restraining the respondents from interfering in their possession. Both Courts have held that actually the respondents are in possession and, therefore, the plaintiffs/appellants were not entitled to file a suit for injunction but should have filed a suit for possession. The learned lower appellate Court has found as follows :- “26. The statement of Shyam Singh carried admission of two important facts. The first is that Rajinder Singh did not take possession of the suit land from the plaintiffs R.S.A No. 2402 of 2008 ::2:: and that he is in possession of the suit land from a time before the birth of this witness. The other admission appearing in the statement of this plaintiff is that the plaintiffs were not in possession of the suit land at the time of the filing of the suit....” In this view of the matter, I find no infirmity in the judgments and decrees of the Courts below and consequently hold that the questions of law proposed do not arise in this appeal. Dismissed with no order as to costs. December 11, 2008 ( AJAY TEWARI ) `kk' JUDGE