1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi WRIT PETITION NO. 923 OF 2009 . Mr. Raju Purushottam Yadla. ..Petitioner. vs. State of Maharahstra & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr. Sanjeev Singh, for Petitioner. Mr. Prakash Hegde, for Respondent No.2. Mr. J. Salvja, AGP, for Respondent No.1. .... CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 5TH AUGUST 2009. P.C. By this writ petition, the petitioners have impugned the supplementary invoice (Exhibit-P to the petition) issued to them by respondent no.2 requiring petitioners to pay an amount of Rs. 1,01,830/-. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the said bill/ invoice is not in accordance with the directions given to the respondent no.2 by the Appellate Authority by its order dated 3 rd January 2009. The learned Advocate appearing for respondent no.2 submits that the amount of Rs.1,01,830/- is incorrectly claimed by respondent no.2. 2 He has submitted that the said bill be set aside and a fresh bill shall be issued by the respondent no.2 to the petitioners in accordance with the order of the Appellate Authority dated 3 rd January 2009. 3. In view thereof, supplementary invoice issued by respondent no.2 to the petitioner, Exhibit-P to the petition, is set aside . The same shall be of no consequence. Respondent no.2 is directed to issue a fresh bill to the petitioners in accordance with the order passed by the Appellate Authority dated 3 rd January 2009. 4. In view thereof, above writ petition stands disposed of with no orders as to costs. [ S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ]