1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 608 OF 2010 1] Shardabai Shamrao Navsupe Age 50 years, Occ. Agri, R/o. Brahmhangaon, Tq. Ashti, Dist. Beed. 2] Shahaji Shamrao Navsupe Age 24 years, Occ. Nil R/o. Bramhangaon, Tq. Ashti Dist. Beed. .. petitioners Versus 1] Shamrao Bhau Navsupe Age 59 , Occ. Agri, R/o. Brahmangaon, Tq. Ashti Dist. Beed. 2] Sumanbai Shamrao Navsupe Age 59 years, Occ. Household R/o. Bramhangaon ,Tq. Ashti Dist. Beed. .. Respondent. --- Mr. N.V. Gaware, Advocate for the petitioner, CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 19th April, 2010. PER COURT :- 1] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, taken up for final hearing. 2] The original defendants presented an application on 12/1/2010, in a pending suit bearing R.C.S. No. 291/2006, urging the trial court to permit 2 them to place on record copies of the documents noted in the list annexed to the application. There are 7 items illustrated in the list annexed to the application. 3] The original plaintiff has admitted Item Nos. 1 to 5 and apparently, does not have any objection for tendering those documents by the defendants on record. The original plaintiff has objected for acceptance of the documents noted at Sr. Nos. 6 and 7 in the list. The trial court, however, has rejected the application tendered by the defendants in its entirety in view of the order passed on 12/1/2010. 4] I have perused the application as well as the impugned order ad heard the learned counsel for the parties. The order passed by the trial court is obviously erroneous for the reason that there was no objection by the plaintiff in respect of the item Nos. 1 to 5 in the list presented by the defendants. The application was not liable to be turned down in its entirety. The counsel appearing for the respondents has no serious objection for permitting the defendants to place on record the certified copies of the proceedings mentioned in the list of documents at Sr.Nos. 1 to 5. 5] In this view of the matter, the writ petition deserves to be allowed and the same is accordingly allowed. The order passed by the trial court in R.C.S. No. 291/2006 dated 12/1/2010 is set aside. The trial court shall permit the defendants to place on record the documents mentioned at Sr. Nos. 1 to 5 in the list annexed to the application tendered by the defendants on 12/1/2010. Rule is made absolute to that extent. In the circumstances, there shall no orders as to costs. [R.M. BORDE,J.] Grt/- 3