IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :31.10.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE D. HARIPARANTHAMAN Writ Petition No.7079 of 2011 V.Murali Proprietor M/s Kishan Star Vision No.2/95 Pushpa Illam Nethaji Nagar, Mookandapalli Village Hosur Taluk Krishnagiri District .. Petitioner /vs/ 1.The Post Master General Department of Posts O/o The Head Post Master(HSG-I) Krishnagiri 2.Vijayakumar .. Respondents PRAYER: This Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.2.2011 within a stipulated period. For Petitioner : Mr.P.T.Perumal For Respondent No.1 : Mrs.S.Seethalakshmi-R1 (Senior Panel Counsel for Central Government ) ORDER The petitioner is doing cable T.V. Business at Hosur. It is stated that he has been running the business from the year 2009. The second respondent had entered the same business in the year 2010 and that is the reason for filing this writ petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. It seems that there is a business rivalry between the petitioner and the second respondent. Allegations are made against the second respondent and a First Information Report was also lodged against the second respondent. The petitioner has also given a petition to first respondent to cancel his registration. In the said circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court to pass orders on his representation. 3. In my view, this Court cannot be used to settle business rivalries. No case is made out for maintaining the writ petition. The writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. No costs. Sd/ Asst. Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar ari To The Post Master General Department of Posts O/o The Head Post Master(HSG-I) Krishnagiri +1CC to S.Seethalakshmi, Advocate SR.65907 W.P.No.7079 of 2011 RSI(CO) KSA (17/11/2011) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/