^ Thakur HSGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BSLASPUR W.P.rS)No. 730 of 2008 Petitionsr Mahendra Kumar Pathari, aged about 34 years, S/o Shri Ramkhjiawan Pathari, R/o vHlsge & Post Sargaon, Disirid Bitaspur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State Govt. of ChhatSisgshr. through- Secretary, Road and Transport, Syiantra'ays. D.K.S. Bhavan, Ralpur (C.G.) 2. Managlng Director, Chhattfsgarh Infrastructure Development Corporatjon (CJ.D.C.) (Transport Diyjsion), D.K.S. Bhavan, Rajpur (C.G.) 3. Divisionai Manager, Chhaffisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporatjon (Transport Division), Bilaspur (C.G.) WRST PETSTOSN UNDER ARTSCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTSON OF INDJA SlngSe Bench : Hon'ble iMr. SsSssh K. Agnihotri. J. Shri Devesh Chandra Vsrma. Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi. Deputy GovS. AcSvocate for the respondent/State. ORALORDER (Passed on t'nis 4th day of February, 2008) 1. Lsarned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on jnstructsons, submits that the petitioner seeks to withdraw this psttti'on, •w§th ilberty to take recourse to the Labour Court under the provjsions of law. 2. Learned counseS appearing for the rsspondents has no objectjon to the abovs submissjon. 3. In vlew of the above, the petltion is djsmissed as wlthdrawn, wlth the abovestated !Iberty. No order asto costs. 4. The Labour Court Is at Ijberty to consider th©appSlcation for condonation ofdeiay on Its own merits, In accordance with iaw. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge