Wp 959/11 1 SRS. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.959/2011 Rajeev Jain Petitioner Vs. The M.C.G.M.& Anr. Respondents Mr.Suresh Dubey for petitioner Ms.Gharpure for respondent CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE: 17 th November,2011 P.C. 1 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has preferred an application for regularisation of the construction in question, though the same is not annexed to the petition. 2 In case any such application is filed, appropriate authority may take decision within three weeks from today after hearing the petitioner. Till then the impugned notice issued under section 53(1) of Wp 959/11 2 the M.R.T.P.Act may not be implemented. 3 However, if no such application is given by the petitioner, it is open to the concerned authority to take the decision as per law. 4 The petitioner initially to appear before the authority on 29/11/2011 during office hours to pursue his application. 5 It is clarified that in case no such application is pending, it will not be necessary for the Corporation to wait for the implementation of the notice in question. 6 In case the decision is adverse on the application for regularisation of the petitioner, said decision may not be implemented for the period of one week . Subject to what is stated above the petition is disposed of. ( MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )