IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 738 of 2008 (M/S) Mahendra Pal Singh & others. ……. Petitioners Versus Karan Pal & others. ……… Respondents Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. M. K. Agarwal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. R.B. Agarwal, advocate for respondent No. 3. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I feel that in the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned Tribunal ought to have released the amounts in question in favour of the petitioners because the petitioners have attained majority. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 31st March, 2008 is set aside. It is directed that the amounts apportioned in favour of the petitioners vide the operative part of the judgment and award dated 20th April, 2006 shall now be paid to the petitioners and not remain in any Fixed Deposit. The writ petition is allowed and disposed of. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 18.12.2008 G