S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Application No.5636/2007 (Krishan Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : November 19, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.D.L.Mothsra, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It has not been disputed that the petitioner was found stealing the electricity. Earlier also, he committed similar nature of offence. This shows that the petitioner is habitual in committing the theft of electricity. In the circumstances, therefore, in my view, it is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail, on the contrary, a custodial interrogation is necessary. The bail application filed by the petitioner under section 438 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-