IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15126 of 2008 MAGISTER MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 20.8.2008. Heard counsel for the petitioner and opposite party no.2. Petitioner is husband. He is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint case no.1860 of 2007 registered for offence under Section 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code. In the application for grant of anticipatory bail though it has been stated that the petitioner is ready to live with his wife and has filed a case for restitution of conjugal life. I find that he has made allegation of adultery against his wife in the petition filed for restitution of conjugal life. The intention of the petitioner is not very much convincing. Considering this fact prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. However, in case petitioner files his application for granting bail and dispute in between the parties is compromised, petitioner’s prayer for bail be considered by the court below in accordance with law. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J)