IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 17TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 2505 of 2008(W) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ KATHREENA CLEETUS, AGED 52 YEARS, W/O. CLEETUS, KADEPPARAMBIL HOUSE, PUTHENPALLI, VARAPUZHA P.O., VARAPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.V.JOJO SRI.JOSE PAUL (POOVAN) RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 2. ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, PARAVUR. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, VARAPUZHA VILLAGE OFFICE, VARAPUZHA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 2505 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: February 6, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner submits that by submitting Ext.P2 he had applied for effecting mutation in respect of 7.5 cents of land in Sy.No.343/9A of Varappuzha village. That was replied by the 2nd respondent in Ext.P3 wherein he has stated that he has been advised that the request can be considered only after the disposal of A.S.No.220/2003 pending consideration of this court. 2. It would appear that, according to the petitioner, the subject matter of A.S.220/2003 is not the land in respect of which he has applied for mutation. According to him the subject matter of the appeal suit is 41 cents of land in Sy.No.343/9 and not the land in Sy.No.343/9A of Varappuzha village. However, from the records produced, it is not clear that the petitioner has brought this fact to the notice of the 2nd respondent on receipt of Ext.P3. 3. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing that in reply to Ext.P3 it will be open to the petitioner to explain to the 2nd WP(C) 2505/08 Page numbers respondent his contention that the land which is the subject matter of AS 220/2003 is different from the land in respect of which he has applied for mutation in Ext.P3. If the petitioner furnishes such details, the 2nd respondent will consider Ext.P2 in the light of the details so furnished and pass appropriate orders in the matter without delay. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-