IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.18985 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 03, 2012 Saudagar Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.B.S.Bhalla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, DAG, Punjab, for the State. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner is a guarantor. The loan amount for which he stood as a guarantor has not been cleared. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the person, who has taken loan, has been rejected today. The petitioner would appear before the Investigating Officer and furnish an undertaking to the effect that in case the main loanee fails to discharge the entire loan liability, he would be liable to pay the loan amount as a guarantor in accordance with law. The order staying the arrest of the petitioner shall continue only on furnishing of such undertaking before the Investigating Officer within two weeks. The present petition is accordingly disposed of with the above directions. January 03, 2012 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE