IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28148 of 2009 Bibi Jahooka Khatoon, wife of Md. Naseem, resident of village- Hathiyouda, Bihariganj, P.S.-Bihariganj, District- Madhepura. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Bibi Anjum Ara, wife of Md. Kasim. 3. Md. Kasim, son of late Md. Munir. 4. Bibi Samina, D/o Md. Ismail. (All residents of village- Milki, P.S.-Bihpur, District- Bhagalpur) 5. Bishwajit Kumar Verma, son of not known, Deed writer, Registry Office, Bihpur, P.S.-Bihpur, District- Bhagalpur. ----------- 2. 23.08.2011 The informant-petitioner has preferred this application against the order dated 3.07.2009 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Naugachia in Bihpur P.S. Case No.157/09 by which the bail has been granted to the accused opposite party nos. 2 to 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the learned Magistrate has observed that it is a case of civil nature and secondly the accused persons are threatening the petitioner not to depose in the case against them and also to withdraw the case. Learned counsel for the State submits that no 2 interference in the impugned order is required by this Court. After hearing the learned counsel for both the parties, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The petitioner is at liberty to raise her grievance before the learned trial court, who will look into the grievance of the petitioner. In the result, this application stands disposed of. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)