IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.6995 of 2011. Decided on: 12th October, 2011. Munshi Ram vs. State of H.P. & others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Avinash Jaryal, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers : “a) That the case of the petitioner has already decided in favour of him and benefits which are required to be granted to the petitioner are being delayed on the unnecessarily ground which are not tenable in the eyes of law and justice. b) That the petitioner submits here that he has been seeking justice since 1996 which he had filed an original application before the then Administrative Tribunal and while deciding his case by this Hon’ble High Court has allowed the case of the petitioner and inspite of this the petitioner is being deprived from the relief for which he fully deserved and held entitled.” 2. On both prayers, the issues are covered in favour of the petitioner in the writ petition, the first prayer in terms of LPA No.36 of 2010 titled Sita Ram vs. State of H.P & ors 2 and the second prayer in terms of case titled Dilip Kumar vs. State of H.P & Ors. 3. There will be a direction to the second respondent to look into the case of the petitioner in the light of the above decisions and grant eligible benefits to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of production of the copy of this judgment by the petitioner before the second respondent. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 12th October, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (cs) Judge.