IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2009 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 36945 of 2009(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- V.S.LAILA, PART TIME SWEEPER, KRISHI BHAVAN, PAMPAKUDA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, KERALA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, ERNAKULAM. 4. AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, PAMPAKUDA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. MRS.ANU SIVARAMAN, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.36945 of 2009 (K) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 21st day of December, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner submits that being a Part Time Sweeper, she is eligible for the benefit of regularisation as per G.O.(P) No.501/2005/Fin. dated 25/11/2005, a copy of which is Ext.P6. According to the petitioner, the sweeping area being above 100 square meters, Exts.P2 & P3 proposals have been placed before the 1st respondent and that the matter is pending. The petitioner also states that she is getting the benefit of enhanced wages. Now that according to the petitioner, Ext.P2 & P3 proposals referred to above are pending consideration of the 1st respondent, I direct the 1st respondent to consider Exts.P2 & P3 proposals, in the light of Ext.P6 Government Order referred to above, and pass final orders in the matter. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg