IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2594 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 2594 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 2594 OF 2007 1. Union of India & 4 ors. ] .. Petitioners Versus Shri V.S. Solanki ] .. Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul G. Walia for the respondent. CORAM: S.B. MHASE, & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 11TH JUNE, 2007 P.C. : . Heard Mr. Suresh Kumar. Perused the scrutiny carried out by the Central Administrative Tribunal (for short "CAT"). Basically, the evidence in respect of the swallowing of money is absolutely discrepant. The CAT has also found that the officers have acted under the influence of the Vigilance Cell and, therefore, ultimately it is found that the findings recorded by the Enquiry Officer were perverse and without any evidence. We have gone through the judgment of CAT and we are satisfied that proper scrutiny has been carried out by the CAT and, therefore, we refrain to entertain the Petition because it involves appreciation of evidence in : 2 : the departmental enquiry which has been properly considered by the CAT. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- [R.S. MOHITE, J.] [R.S. MOHITE, J.] [R.S. MOHITE, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.]