C^ [00 Z- IN THE HIGH CQURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ~5^^T WRIT PETITION (S) No. Of2007 PETITIONER / : Pawan Kumar Khadatkar , aged about 44 years S/o Late Shri Jago '...^"^'^Rao Khadatkar, Assistant Grade - 2, r.-<^ ..••'"" ^)/° ^olnt Director , Veterinary "^^" Services , Jagdalpur Distaict Bastar (CG). .^^'^ ^"y lys- y .a.-"'^'';'L\9-" \y VERSUS RESPONDENTS -< l.The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretaiy, Departm.ent of Veterinary Services , Mantralay - D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. Director , Directorate ofVeterinaxy Services , Near Guru Tej Bahadur Park, G.E. Road, Raipur (CG). /.^^ ^ y-v>' 'S^K ^/APA^.V^ fi*ljl''%^VA-U <1- \CG^fc?^/J^ '^€iW%^ 'V:'si''i~!J-.^-'\i* '•' <;^'-T^"S- 3. Joint Director, Veterinary Services, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG). 4. CoUector, Bastar District at Jagdalpur(CG). > 5. Treasury Officer, District Treasury , Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG). /" . WRIT ra;TITIQN_UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -au^SS^^S^2 fr5ffl®'^^^ss^?®' HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISHK. AGNiHOTRI. J. Petitioner WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.564 OF 2007 Pawan Kumar Khadatkar vereus Respondents : The State of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.580 OF 2007 Petitioner : Pardeshi Ram Verma versus Respondents : The State of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner Respondents WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.585 OF 2007 Lokeshwar Kumar Sahu yersys The State of Chhattisgarh and ottiers Present : Mr. S.K.Thomas, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents. ORDER (Passed on 29th Day of January, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the parties joindy submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present wrtt petitions Sopal are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Smt Sujats Thakur vs. State of Chhatttsgarti and anaOier (Writ Petition (S.) No.3912 of 2005). dated 30-8-2006. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ pefitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the mrtter of Smt Sujata Thakur vs. Stete af ChhaWsgarti and anottier (Supra). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the connected writ petitions. atish K. AgB>.l*otr Judge »ai