HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI B. PRAKASH RAO W.P.No. 15993 of 1996 and S.A.No.1150 of 1996 Date: 25-11-2010 W.P.No.15993 of 1996: Between Veer Shetty ………… Petitioner And The Joint Collector, Medak at Sangareddy and others. …… Respondents HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI B. PRAKASH RAO W.P.No. 15993 of 1996 and S.A.No.1150 of 1996 COMMON ORDER: Since both the matters arose and involved in respect of similar claims, they are taken up together for disposal. The petitioner in the writ petition, who is the appellant in the second appeal, is claiming his occupancy rights in respect of the land to an extent of Ac.5-37 guntas, whereas the respondent also set up his claim on the same land. Ultimately in both the proceedings before the Civil Court as well as before the authority as constituted under the provision of the A.P. (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, it has been specifically found initially, no doubt, that both the parties are entitled to half each. However, subsequently, the appellate authority under the said Act and also in Appeal on the civil side, which arose out of a comprehensive suit filed for declaration, it has been held that the petitioner, who is the appellant in the second appeal, is not entitled to any such half share, and the contesting respondent is only entitled to the exclusive rights of the property in its entirety basing upon the finding that he is in possession. Having regard to the finding of fact and also in view of the parallel proceedings one, on the revenue side and another on the civil side, it is not open for this Court to interfere with the same since no substantial question of law arises to warrant any interference. There are no merits in the writ petition and also in the second appeal. Accordingly, the Writ Petition and the Second Appeal are dismissed. No order as to costs. ____________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, HACJ Date: 25-11-2010 YCR