IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 4303 of 2010 Date of decision:- 31.03.2011 Dharam Chand and others ....Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana and others. ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present:- Mr. Jagbir Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Ramesh Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. N.R. Dahiya, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2, 4 to 7. Mr. Sukant Gupta, Addl. A.G. Haryana. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) Respondent No. 3 is stated to have expired. Since Jagdish, Ramesh, Sammat and Narender sons of respondent No.3 are already on record, therefore, there is no requirement to implead them. This petition assails the order dated 10.06.2010 (Annexure P-2) passed by the District Judge, Rohtak, declining to grant injunction to the petitioners. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. However, the Appellate Court is directed to dispose of the appeal within two months positively. (A.N.JINDAL) 31st of March, 2011 JUDGE ajp