IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2009 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 CRP.No. 1309 of 2004(E) ---------------------- CMA.4/2002 of PRL.SUB COURT, THALASSERY OS.808/1999 of ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT, KANNUR (IA 3195/2000) .................... REVN. PETITIONER: --------------------- M.K.ARUN BABU, S/O. KARUNAKARAN, 'PUSHPA NIVAS', NEAR S.N.COLLEGE, ELAVAYOOR AMSOM, KANNUR. BY ADV. MR.RAJESH NAMBIAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. K.RAMESHAN S/O. KANNAN NAIR, ARTIST, 'SHILPI', NEAR BUS STAND KANNUR, MUNICIPALITY. 2. VELLUVAKKANDY PRABHAKARAN, S/O. ANANDAN, OCCUPATION BUSINESS, RESIDING OF 'SREE PRABHA' ELAYAVOOR AMSOM CHOVVA DESOM, KANNUR TALUK & DISTRICT. 3. ACHUTHAN C., ACCOUNTANT SUPER BAZAR COMPLEX, FORT ROAD, KANNUR. ADV. MR.K.V.SOHAN FOR R1 MR.SREEJA SOHAN.K. FOR R1 THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ----------------------------------- C.R.P.No.1309 of 2004 - E --------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of December, 2009 O R D E R Revision is directed against the judgment rendered by the learned Sub Judge, Thalassery, confirming the order passed by the learned Munsiff, Kannur. Petitioner was proceeded against for violating an interim order of injunction passed by the court in O.S.No.808 of 1999 on the file of the Munsiff Court, Kannur. After taking evidence on that petition with the suit learned Munsiff came to the conclusion that the petitioner had willfully disobeyed the order of injunction and thereupon he was directed to be detained in civil prison for a period of one month. Against that order, petitioner preferred an appeal as C.M.A.No.4 of 2002 before the Sub Court, Thalassery. Learned Sub Judge after reappreciating the materials produced concurring with the views formed by the court below dismissed the appeal with costs. Hence this revision. 2. I heard the counsel on both sides. 3. At the time of hearing, it is submitted by the counsel on both sides that the parties have settled the disputes out of C.R.P.No.1309 of 2009 - E 2 court with the petitioner agreeing to compensate the injury suffered by the respondent on account of the violation of the injunction order passed by the court. It is submitted that towards compensation for the injury suffered by the respondent, petitioner had paid a sum of Rs.3,000/-. Receipt of that sum as compensation is acknowledged by the counsel for the first respondent. Submissions made as above is recorded. First respondent, it is seen, was the plaintiff in the court below in whose favour the order of injunction was passed against the petitioner/first defendant in the suit. Having regard to the settlement arrived by the parties, I find nothing survives for consideration in the revision. The impugned order passed by the learned Sub Judge confirming the order of the learned Munsiff is set aside, and the revision is closed. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE. bkn/-