THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED C.M.A.No.840 of 2004 JUDGMENT: This appeal is filed under Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 (for short ‘the Act’) against the award, dated 01.12.2003, passed by the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad (for short ‘the Commissioner’) in W.C.No.9 of 2002 filed by the first respondent-claimant, claiming compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by her. She pleaded that on 10.12.2001 at about 5.00 PM herself and others were working at Crusher machine of Jattarpally village, Pargi Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and when they were waiting for loading the stones in the tractor, the driver of the tractor took the vehicle reverse in a rash and negligent manner and hit the claimant, as a result of which, she sustained grievous injuries to her knee. The case was contested by the appellant. Through the order under appeal, the Commissioner awarded a sum of Rs.70,182/-towards compensation to the claimant payable by the appellant and the second respondent, within 30 days from the date of the said order. Aggrieved by the said award, the appellant- insurer, filed the present appeal. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for respondent No.1, who filed caveat. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant contended that the Commissioner ought not to have taken note of Ex.A8-disability certificate, which was marked after trial, without there being any evidence of the Doctor, who issued the said certificate. 4. From a perusal of the award impugned, it is evident that claimant filed Ex.A8 after her evidence was completed and that as per Ex.A-8, the physical disability of her is 50% and that she sustained injuries while she was in employment. Taking into account the said disability, the Commissioner awarded a sum of 62,394/- together with the sum of Rs.7,487/- being simple interest @ 12% per annum from 10.12.2001. Court fee and Advocate’s fee at Rs.100/- and Rs.200/-respectively were also added to that amount and in total, a sum of Rs.70,182/- was awarded to the claimant. Since the Commissioner has awarded just and reasonable compensation to the claimant, I do not find any infirmity in the award impugned warranting interference by this Court. 5. Hence, the civil miscellaneous appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J Date: 22.07.2010 sj