IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 25TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 3RD ASWINA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3343 of 2007() ------------------------------ CRA.160/2001 of ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA CC.553/1997 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, ADOOR .................... REVN. PETITIONER: APPELLANT/ACCUSED ----------------------------------- K.N.RAVI, ANISH BHAVAN, PERINGALA, MULAKKUZHA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.BINDU SREEKUMAR SRI.K.G.RENGANATH RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE -------------------------------------------- 1. P.V.KOCHIYAPPA, CHAKKALAYIL THEKKETHIL, MUTTATHUKONAM MURI, ELAVUMTHITTA, MEZHUVELI VILLAGE.(DIED). 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. 3. SUSY KURIAN, THAZHATHEDATHU, (NEAR POLICE STATION), KEEZHVAIPUR P.O., MALLAPPALLY. BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP M.VARUGHESE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Crl. R.P. No. 3343 OF 2007 ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 25th day of September, 2007 O R D E R The revision petitioner, who was the accused in C.C.No.553/1997 on the file of the JFCM, Adoor for an offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the trial court for the said offence. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter and have filed Crl.M.A.No.10089/2007 under section 147 of the Act for recording the composition entered into by them. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. The composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal within the meaning of section 320(8) Cr.P.C. Money, if any, paid by the revision petitioner pursuant to orders, if any, passed by the lower appellate court shall be refunded to the revision petitioner. This revision petition is disposed of as above. (V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE) aks