I;):l :s .^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No^^^/ 2010 PETITIONER Smt. Rupa Uppal W/o Shri Kapil Uppal, Aged about 48 years, Occupation - Principal Govt. Girls H. Secondary SchoolSupela Bhilai Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^e ^s^c .^i§^" ^<e's,cf ^ &-- 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2.' Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur ^(C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA IISiiiUi—.-^-^—- ±_ _PAPTICIII ARS OF THF PFTITinNRR—. -HC-22 'S^ •<i|tiici<i, OTilwis. [ctciwy STI^?T xra^ _.......U:.B...a.}..£<£_~^i4(.» "WI. 200 lltCTI Sh*IIct) ld*<{!ST' an^r'qiT fyipi'CT^r sciiii ^ifta SB : HON'BLB MR, JUSTICE PRtnNKBR DIWAKER •*wid'fl-( IWrtTit fc'<il (Rl^K i;3iP<n3ii^t 06.12,2010 Shri Vipin Tiwari, counse! for Shri Ajit Singh, P.L. for the St the petitioner. rte. Counsel for the petitioner |submits that the petitioner is enfcitled;,to benefit of two advance) increments on account of she having passed B.Ed. examination ajfter her appointment at her own cost. It is submitted tbat the issue no longer res integra and the sam^ Hontile Supreme Court in the case ^s! AabSi Saxena Vs. State of M.P. & On. 2009 (III)MPJR (8C) 59. .nvolved in the present petition is has been finally decided by the . It is further submitted that view in its order dated 6.2.2009 Counsel for the petitioner furthe| 29.4.2010 passed in Writ Appeal| upon thejudgment of the Supreme| (supra) and the order passed by thij 87/2009, directions have been issi grant of two advance increinents] issued by the State of Madhya pleaded in the petition. lis Court has also taken a similar issed in W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008. submits that the order dated N0. 124/2009, wherein relyins Court in the case of Asha Saxeaa Court in another Writ Appeal No. id for consideration of the case for as per circular dated 21.9.1974 iesh, after verification of the facts Counsel for the State subt'nits that ease of the petitioners would also be considered on the salme Unes. In view of above, the petitio|i is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to dec|ide the claim of the petitioner for \ grant of two advattce increment^ as per ciroular dafed 21.9.1974 ' ^•^Ft .u^-3'-'-^:^, Si ^la"'!ttt> l •| "-s-'s'^ J ^^y.,/ XI-HC-22 ^^ 'i\H\v\^, afllwie. (°l<'liyi< 3Tlt?T 'IR^R •(mor 'shHrai '^1. 200 ft-B-^' 311^1'qil 1?TO; 311^1 ^lt^TElt^cf (f sn^i ?^iTwa%?r Prad^sh issued by the State of Madhya pleaded in the petition within a perioc) It is made clear that this Couit on inerits of the case and the to decide the same strictly in authori|ty accordahce <ftt*if<n<fli TW^^ ^^ ^fst-^.K •^SlPOT 31)^1 after verification of the facts of eight weeks from today. I; has not expressed any opinion concemed would be at Uberty with law. Sd/- pritinker Diwakar Judge 1 -^ -^fj^ .^