IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1003/2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.442/2010 TIKARAM MANIKRAO DHENGRE ..VS.. SMT. SONDERBAI DAMAJI NAVGHARE & ORS Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or judges Orders. CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE: 23 /7/2010 Heard Shri Chahande learned advocate for the appellant, Shri Najbile, learned advocate for respondent no.1 and Shri R.AKayal learned advocate for respondent no.2. Though the applicant claims to be in possession of the suit property, it is observed by the trial court that the applicant has lost the possession at the time of execution of the agreement of sale. There is serious dispute between the parties about the possession over the suit property. In such circumstances, it would not be in the interest of justice to grant an order of temporary injunction restraining the non applicants from dispossessing the applicants from the suit land. Instead, the parties are directed to maintain status-quo during the pendency of the first appeal, as both the parties are claimed to be in possession of the property. Civil application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. JUDGE SMP.