,^^f}^ ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR: a B t-> lj¥li;££ MC.C.C. N0. A?X OF 2011 Applicant 4 ^/y/^ ^///^ ^"/' ^o '^o Respondent l^/ Ramlakhan Verma (Wrongly Mentioned in cause title as Ramlakhan Sharma) , S/o Late Ramkishor Verma, aged about 43 year, Sundibai, W/o Ramlakhan Verma (Wrongly Mentioned in cause title), aged about 40 years Both R/o Lalpur, Manendragarh Distt- Koriya (C.G.) Versus :. Jagjit Singh Alias Jaggu, S/o Harchandra Singh, aged 29 years, R/o G.M. Complex, Poudi, P.S. Poudi. (Owner/ Driver) ^. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Through, Divisional Manager, Opposite High Court, Bilaspur (C.G.) (Insurer) ^••^ APPLICATION FOR CORECTION/MODIFICATION QF ORDER -^ DATED 9.11.2010 PASSED BY HON'BLE COURT IN M.A. 137/^004 t __ ._n"lP>-ri--s'^a^LLrY<-»^»--<-^*- )<. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR M. C. C. No. 188 of 2011 Applicants Ramlakhan Verma 85 another Versus Respondents Jagjit Singh alias Jaggu & another DB: Hon?ble Shri I. M. Quddusi 8& Hon'ble Shri N. K. Agarwal, JJ APPLICATION FOR CQRRECTIQN/MODIFICATQIN OF THE ORDER Shri Sanjay Aganval, Advocate for the applicants. ORDERtorall (Passed on this 20th day ofApril, 2011) Per I. M, Quddusi, J. 1. 2. 3. 4. The applicant has filed this application for correction/modification of the order dated 9.11.2010 passed by this Court in M.A.No. 137/2004. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the claimants Ram Lakhan Verma and Sundi Bai had filed Claim Case No. 49/2002 wherein award was passed on 1.11.2003. Against that award the Oriental Insurance Company had preferred M.A.No. 137/2004. In the cause title the appellant had wrongly mentioned the name of the claimant No,l as Ramlakhan 'Sharma' s/o Late Ramkishore 'Sharma' and husband's name of claimant No.2 was wrongly mentioned as Ramlakhan <Sharma\ Having heard learned counsel and having perused the papers available on record, the application is allowed. The applicant is permitted to make corrections, as pointed out above, in the cause title on M.A.No. 137/2004 which was dismissed vide order dated9.il.2010. In view of the above, the M.C.C. No. 188/2011 stands disposed of. ^-» Sd/- Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Thakur I.M.Quddusi Judge Judge