IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.02.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.NO.33614 OF 2006 P. Sathasivam .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai – 4. 2.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Seerudai Paniyalar Thervu Miam, (Police Recruitment Board) Chennai – 20. .. Respondents PRAYER : Original Application No.10873 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, praying to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent in O.Mu.No.124945/R.&D (3)/97 dated, 28.7.97 and quash the same and direct the respondents herein to appoint the applicant herein as Grade-II constable and provide him due seniority and other monitory benefits on the basis of his selection in the year 1987- 88. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition For Petitioner : Mr.C.Godwin For Respondents : Mr.B.Vijay Government Advocate O R D E R Original Application No.10873 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, praying to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent in O.Mu.No.124945/R.&D (3)/97 dated, 28.7.97 and to quash the same and to direct the respondents herein to appoint the petitioner as Grade-II Police Constable and provide him due seniority and other monetary benefits on the basis of his selection in the year 1987- 88. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. 2.The petitioner has made a representation to the first respondent on 2.6.1997 for the above said relief and it was negatived by the Director General of Police stating that for the year 1987-88, the test was conducted and all the vacancies were https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ filled up and hence, the claim of the petitioner cannot be considered. 3.It is not clear as to whether the petitioner was subsequently granted the relief. The rejection was only on account of want of vacancy. The petitioner if still aggrieved due to non-employment, he can seek appointment as and when vacancies are notified or applications are called for. No relief can be granted to the petitioner by setting aside the impugned proceedings, which is only a letter communicating the vacancy status as of the year 1987-88. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar /True Copy/ Sub.Asst.Registrar vsm To 1.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai – 4. 2.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Seerudai Paniyalar Thervu miam, (Police Recruitment Board) Chennai – 20. + 1 cc to Government Pleader,SR.9009 W.P. NO.33614 of 2006 BVR(CO) EM/26.2.10 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/