1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3754 OF 2006 Girish Chunilal Mandali & Ors .. Petitioners Vs Nashik Municipal Corporation & Ors .. Respondents G.S. Godbole for the petitioners Shri. R.S. Apte for respondent no. 1 CORAM : A.S. OKA, J DATE : 28th JULY, 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard learned advocate for the petitioners who are the original plaintiffs. In a suit filed by the petitioners, they applied for temporary injunction. The application was rejected by the trial court. The appeal preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed by the District Court by order dated 13th February, 2006. 2. After having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, I find that at this stage, no case is made out for interfering with the discretionary orders passed by the court below, especially Rma wp3754-06.sxw 2 when from 13th February, 2006, there is no interim or ad interim relief operating in favour of the petitioners. 3. No case for interference is made out. Writ petition is rejected. It is, however, made clear that the observations made by the courts below in the impugned orders are tentative observations and the trial court will decide the suit as early as possible without being influenced by the said observations. JUDGE Rma wp3754-06.sxw 3 Rma wp3754-06.sxw