IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1650 of 2010 KRISHNA PRASAD, SON OF LATE RAM CHANDRA PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – TEHTA, P.O. TEHTA, P.S.- MAKHDUMPUR, DISTRICT – JEHANABAD. ….. PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH MR. C.K. MISRA, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (BIHAR) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, PATNA. 2. MR. RANA AWADHESH, THE COMMISSIONER (MAGADH ZONE), DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, GAYA. 3. DR. R.N. PANDEY, THE DIRECTION IN CHIEF, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. DR. ARUN KUMAR SINHA, THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR (MAGADH ZONE) HEALTH SERVICE, GAYA. 5. MRS. PALKA SAHNI, THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, JEHANABAD. 6. DR. KUMAR AADHESH CHAND SRIVASTAVA, THE CIVL SURGEON –CUM- CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, JEHANABAD. ……… CONTEMNORS/OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 03/ 03.12.2010 This application was filed by the petitioner for initiating a proceeding of contempt against the opposite parties for willful disobedience of order dated 19.11.2009 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 11970 of 2009. The direction of this Court was to the petitioner that he should approach the Principal Secretary, Department of Health and the Principal Secretary, Department of Health was directed to consider the case of the petitioner within eight weeks from the date of the filing of representation by disposing it off with a reasoned order, whether appointment of the petitioner was irregular, illegal or forged. Show cause has been filed on behalf of O.P. 2 Nos. 1 to 3. In para 5 of the show cause it has been stated that as per the direction of this Court the case of the petitioner was considered on the basis of the evidence and connected documents. The Principal Secretary vide order dated 02.11.2010 contained in Memo No. 1861 (4) has disposed of the petitioner’s representation and the order has been communicated to the petitioner. The order dated 02.11.2010 has been annexed as Annexure-A, from which it transpires that on consideration of the facts and the connected documents an order rejecting the claim of the petitioner has been passed. There is compliance of the direction of this Court. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved he has remedy available to move before the appropriate forum. This application is disposed of. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)