IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25770 of 2010 UDIT KUMAR UDAY S/O DEO NARAYAN PRASAD YADAV, R/O VILLAGE-RAHTA, P.S. KUMARKHAND, DISTRICT- MADHEPURA. --PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. KUMARI PRABHA D/O SIKANDAR PRASAD YADAV, R/O VILLAGE-KOLHAIPATTI, P.S. MURLIGANJ, DISTRICT-MADHEPURA. --OPP.PARTY 5 02.02.2011 A supplementary affidavit has been filed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. None appeared on behalf of opposite party no.2. Petitioner is named accused in this case, being husband of the complainant and in view of earlier order dated 25.8.2010 one Matrimonial Suit no.45 of 2010 before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Madhepura, has already been disposed of on the basis of compromise entered into between the parties who are, as appears from the order of the Court, residing together and leading happy marital life. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within four 2 weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, in Complaint Case no. 573 of 2009, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad