IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15641 of 2008 MD.NURUDDIN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 18.7.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel for O.P. No.2. The petitioner who happens to be the husband of the complainant (O.P. No.2) apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.656 of 2005 under Sections 498-A, 494, 379, 406 and 323 I.P.C. As per the complaint petition itself, the complainant was married some 12 years back and it appears that after the death of her father, her in-laws started demanding that her mother should execute immovable property and keep the amount derived therefrom with the husband and his family members. There is also allegation under Sections 494, 379, 406 and 323 I.P.C. for which the learned counsel for O.P. No.2 is unable to justify these allegations. In the aforesaid facts and the circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below by the petitioner, Md. Nuruddin, within three weeks from today, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of Shri B.K. Srivastava, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Rosera, Samastipur or his successor in his office in connection withy Complaint Case No.656 of 2005 subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. P.S. (Abhijit Sinha,J)