-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WEALTH TAX APPEAL NO. 619 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Wealth Tax-3 ... Appellant vs. Bajaj Auto Ltd. ... Respondent Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant. Ms. Vasanti Patel for the respondent. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & J.P . DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE: NOVEMBER 26, 2008. P.C. The revenue has filed this appeal raising three questions of law. In all the three questions of law, the Tribunal has followed its earlier decision and the matter was adjourned from time to time to take instructions in the matter as to whether the revenue has filed appeal against the order of the Tribunal in the case of the assessee for earlier years. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that inspite of repeated instructions, the department is unable to get instructions in the matter. In this view of the matter, there is nothing on record to show that the revenue has challenged the decision of the Tribunal in the case of the assessee for earlier years which is against the revenue. In view of the above, -2- we see no merit in the appeal. Appeal is dismissed. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J.