ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY APPEAL NO. 29 OF 2005 APPEAL NO. 29 OF 2005 APPEAL NO. 29 OF 2005 IN IN IN COMPNAY COMPNAY COMPNAY PETITION NO.17/111/CLB/WR/2004. PETITION NO.17/111/CLB/WR/2004. PETITION NO.17/111/CLB/WR/2004. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms.Soomya Shrikrishna a/w Ricob Chand i/by M/s. D.S.K.Legal for the appellants. Ms. Ruby Kerawala i/by M/s. Little & Co. for the respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 24th August, 2007 : 24th August, 2007 : 24th August, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The parties have reached at the settlement by memorandum of settlement between Concast A.G. and Accumold A.G. in liquidation and SMS Concast Engineering India Private Ltd. and concast (India) Limited and Mr. Narinder Kumar Nair dated 9th July, 2007. Based upon that by order dated ( 2 ) 24/07/2007 in Writ Petition No.1482-83 of 2006, the show cause notice as well as the letter of 18/03/1999, stand quashed by the Delhi High Court. 2. Based upon that the appellants and respondents have filed the present consent terms dated 09/07/2007, marked "X" is taken on record. It is signed by the appellants and the respondents and there is no dispute about the identification, signature and authorization of the parties. The respective advocates have also signed this. In view of this, the present Company Appeal is disposed of, in terms of the consent terms with liberty. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) V. MOHTA,J.) V. MOHTA,J.)