IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 16106 of 2008. Decided on: 23.06.2011. _______________________________________________ Roshan Lal. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. Onkar Jairath, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition in order to enable his client to make a representation to the competent authority for the redressal of his grievance. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed having been withdrawn, so also the pending application(s), if any. However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner makes a representation, the same shall be 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - considered by the competent authority in accordance with law. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. June 23, 2011. (sck).