IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 4007 of 2008 Decided on: 17.09.2010 Kehar Singh …Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1.No For the petitioner. : None. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner is seeking regularization by claiming that he had worked for 10 years and completed 240 days in each calender year. Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General has drawn attention of this Court to Annexure A-1. A bare perusal of Annexure A-1 reveals that the petitioner has only completed 240 days in 1986. However, the petitioner has not worked for 240 days in each calender year w.e.f. 1987 to 1996. 2. Since, the petitioner has not worked for 10 years continuously and has also not completed 240 days in each calender 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- year except 1986, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge September 17, 2010 (K. Attri)