THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.291 OF 2006 ( DATED: 27.03.2006) Between: Shaik Abdul Rahiman S/o Shaik Hussain Saheb Temporary employee, State Bank of India, Nandyal Branch, Kurnool District. …Appellant A n d State Bank of India rep. by its Regional Manager Hyderabad & Another ….Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.291 OF 2006 JUDGMENT:( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard both sides and at their request, the main appeal itself is taken up for disposal. The appellant is the unsuccessful writ petitioner whose writ petition seeking a Mandamus for a direction to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment in Bank’s subordinate service treating 268 days service put in by him and also to declare that non-consideration of his case as bad and illegal. After hearing the counsel on either side and on perusal of the material, it is seen that the order under appeal, which is challenged now, was passed as long back as on 20.3.2002. Though several grounds are sought to be urged now they appear to be raised for the first time in this appeal. Those grounds are not reflected anywhere in the order or anywhere such a ground is urged. The learned counsel for the appellant points out that similar such employees have been given the benefit. But, the respondents can take into consideration the case of the petitioner only when a proper representation is made. Therefore, we do not find any justification to entertain the appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the appellant to approach the respondent by filing proper representation, which will be considered and disposed of on merits in accordance with law. No costs. __ __________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J 27.3.2006 ________________ D.APPA RAO, J RAR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO. 291 OF 2006 DATED: 27.03.2006