IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 25665 of 2000 Between: D.Lakshmana Reddy, S/o Venkateswara Reddy, R/o Vijayawada, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue (Endowments-IV) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Endowments, Endowments Department, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Endowments Department, Vijayawada. 4 Y.V.Prasad, the fit person Sri Bhavaji Math, Vijayawada, Krishna Distirct. 5 Velagalapudi Sambasiva Rao, R/o Sobhandeswara, Rice Mill, Vijayawada. 6 Velagapudi Sri Ramprasad, R/o Sobhandeswara, Rice Mill, Vijayawada. 7 Velagalapudi Shankara Babu, R/o Sobhandeswara, Rice Mill, Vijayawada. 8 Velagalapudi Shiva Prasad, R/o Sobhandeswara, Rice Mill, Vijayawada. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of "Writ of Mandamus" declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in permitting to sale the property admeasuring 1328.50 sq.Yards situated in Door No.11-62-146, Assessment No.7653, Ward No.6, NTS NO.352, belonging to the 4th respondent in favour of the respondents 5 to 8, as illegal, void, arbitrary and malicious, and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to sell the said property in favour of the petitioner, and pass other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.R.AVULA Counsel for the Respondent : MR.M.ADINARAYANA RAJU FOR R GP FOR ENDOWMENTS FOR R MR.N.GURUGOPAL & S.R.SANKU FOR R The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per Anil R. Dave, CJ) Sri V.R.Avula, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission granted. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with no order as to costs. ______________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 18th June, 2008 _________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J GRR To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies