INTHEHIGHeOURTOFJUDICATUREATBILASPUR \ CRIWIINAL MISCELLftNEOUS PETITIONNO. /^?OF 2006. . Sinfll§Beach Rrabhu Lal Gond, aged abpt.it 70 years, Son of 'late Jahitam Gond, ^resident of Sakin Moja, R.S. Parsoda, Kumhari, Tehsil; Patan.District: Durg , Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh Thraugh: "Fhe.DistFiet Magiistrate, ®urgj|District DurgifChhatfisgarh Ratanlal Sahu, aged ; about 30 years, Spn of PJFeefSahu, K£C^VE0-COP^ ^M^^' CiSSKto 3. Kumar Sahu, aged about SOyears, S/o Ghasiya Sahu 4, ^Rajaram Sahu, aged abeut 25 years, S/o. Pardeshi Sahu 5. Pannalal Sahu, aged about 30 years, S/o JagatFamSahu 6. Kamdev Sahu, aged about .22 years, S/o. Manrakhan Sahu 1 7. Moolchand Sahu, aged ab6i.it ^52 years,S/o . ManrgkhanSahu f'f • • .• A'....•'•. 8. BhujBarPFasaclfSahu, gged .abouK 56 yeare, S/d. Ramdular Sahu ;9. Santurarh Sahu, aged •J about^SKyears, Sfo. , . ^ • BirjhuFam.'Satiu . w ;» 10. lyianoharlal Sahy, aged i^ about 40 years, S/o. Ramak • 11. Netym Sahu, aged about 30 years, S/o. Saroop Sahu . ' 'lt- •• • •'. '•• •• . • ".'..•, . • :' . • • •'•. 12. Neelkhant Sahu, aged abQul 45 years, S/o. ^Jethuram Sahu 'I'r. :.'.:;-:,.:'.-:/::: Jat _ ... - -':_.'.- ' ^ .' Saligi-am Dubey, aged about 4QyeaFS, Coeiperator- Municipal CorpQration, Parsada 14,- Vimal aged .about 30 . years, S/6. Thakur Rarri 'Satiu • ^ 15. Poshan, aged.abouf 29 yeacs, S/o. Bhalau Ram Sahu ': • 16. Virendra Dheemer, aged about 25 years, S/o. Mannu Dheemer 17. Bhalau.aged about58 years, S/o. Teksingh Sahu All Respondentsfrom 2to 17 are resident pf Sakin-Mooja , " Parsada, P.S. Kumhari, Tetlsil: Patan, District: Durg, - Chhattisgarh. APPUCATION L^DERiSE<3MQN 482E;^)R-;I:l-IEi:iie@DES0R CRIMINAL 13R<:ngBi3ugE^973£^iElSlNlggSlR@iIlMSl::R!§M THIS NONI'BLB^OUI^i'.-^^iiMlilNii'U^ MAGISTRATE, SE(UR©0' BSSSll^nffiS^I.MBgl^i^lAB ARPRQRRiATE ^l^fR INgiBMEiSiOMRIiAINT UNREGIST'ERED-lPENDINGSEROReNlMK FACTSOFTHECASE llt-i.'i iM- ^^''^ ^-^•i.' ^-' t^^: lls^ W;! ' 118.1 '.K K^ .^i- ^J' XI-HC-22 sn^rw 'R-ii+sn^r ^TT^^riw Shtlltl TST "i)l<41d'4, ^TTly'IS, (Sfdiyy q^ct) <TT(TPTT9>*<1<*| Sll^l ^SICft ..(jt:.^.f.:M.l06 W( 200 ^ Ri<>^ 3n^?r ?TaTW (:rf?(T 21.02.2007 Shri Saurabh Dangi, Heard on admission. This petition has beea| in the matter of Prabhulgy? CompUaat Case N6. Additional ChiefJudicial Leamed couusel for fhough the coinplaint was but fhe Court below has not| registration/dismissal of pending since the said dat^. directioa be given to fhe early as possible so fhat fhe Perused fhe order anaexed as Annexure A-3. Ttie order sheets woultt on 11/7/2005 and fhe date the police report. Thereafterj purpose on 16/11/2005. also, tiiae was given for on 28/6/2006, when fhe leanued counsel for fhe titae. Qounsel for the applicant ebi^tfi^l-i 4mdTir'te(d'<(«t'wi< ^ari^iTa.n^r |£tfcdfor passing an appropriate order vs. Ratan Lal Sahu aad others, pending in fhe Court of s, Dui^ (C.G.). appKcant/coinplainant aiyies fhat in fhe said Court on 11/7/2005, |taken any substaatial step regarding complaiut and the sanie is kept He also' submits fhat a suitebte betow to take appropriate steps as ^natter is expedited at the earliest. of the trial Court, which is Gbnd (unre^istered) Ma^istrate, tile ftcd thls Coilrt sbeets show that lliis complaint was filed |of 25/8/2005 was fixed for receiving another date •waa given for fhe same ^Then, on various subsequent dates the police report and ultimatefy, was taken up for ai^uments, coia^laiaant/applicant himselEprayed for recei|ving ntatter -) (cf^Eif^) XI-HC-22 an^rw f??R;3TJ^T ?bKi»byRd iFi; ^ ft. 3sr ^i'io^'y, ^>Ti1'y4i^, fa^i-yy tTTWTTSi^r* 311^1 4!)th _.A....)L):.JO.:..(..^.iiG<; ^••^•'••'•'••'•••••••'••'^2( R|<)<A _\ 3)1^1. ^WIW^tI dn tbat ald materfal cos^aa^saat ga|Tdmg Without conuiienting deem it proper to observe wait for fhe police report accordance wifh fhe before Tiim by fhe 200, 202 ofCr.P.C. and'to p^ Section 203 of Cr.P.C.'ref under Section 204 ofCr.P.Cl is fhe basic requirement un4 tfae Code of Cruninal when fbe complainf is made Ttus petition is disp^: Magistrate wiB essentialfy to^ shaU proceed in accordancc by the appUcant as back as| expeditiousty. Let fhe eopy of ttds| uumediatcty. ProcedttFe ^pfe^ WfRif ff Fst^TXf^RZK 2-- ^is^irsn^T the steps taken by fhe Magistrate, I fhe M^strate is not requiBed to he is to proceed in the inatter in avaOablc before him or brought wifhia the p'urview of Scctibiis LSS an appropriate order either under dismissal of fhe complaiat or regarding issuance of process. This er Chapter - XV and Chapter XVI of ue, which the Magistrate is.to foUow johim. >sed of wifh a direction fhat the A iuto the aforesaid provisions and wifh law so fhat the complaint filed on 11/7/2005 inay be disposed of order be scnt to fhe Magistrate Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ('ft^^fa^') fc^-