1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.689 OF 2006 Dinesh Kumar Gupta & Ors. .. Petitioners. Vs. Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority .. Respondents. Mr.Bipin Joshi for the petitioners. Ms.Kiran Bhagalia for the respondents. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 17TH OCTOBER, 2006 DATED : 17TH OCTOBER, 2006 DATED : 17TH OCTOBER, 2006 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondents. 2. Mr.Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press this appeal and submits that all the petitioners be given liberty to approach the competent authority with a representation/s seeking alternate accomodation within one week from today. The liberty as prayed for is granted. If such representations are made they may be considered in accordance with law and the policy of M.M.R.D.A., if any, and if the petitioners are found to be eligible for alternate accomodation they may be provided the same as expeditiously as possible and preferrably within a period of three months from the date of making the 2 2 2 representation/s. By allowing the petitioners to make the representation/s and directing the respondents to consider the representation as aforestated I shall not be understood to have granted any protection to the existing structures. . With these observations the appeal from order is disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)