IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2073 of 2006 CHANDAN KESHRI Versus LORD SHIVJEE & ANR ----------- 05. 12.05.2009 Heard both the sides. The order impugned herein appears completely unsupportable in law. There are decisions of this Court that no third person could be allowed to be impleaded in a suit for eviction if he comes up with claim based on title and interest in the property. The Court has held in several decisions that such impleadment could not be made in favour of a person who is a stranger. In that view of the matter, the impugned order is hereby set aside. The impleadment of O.P. No. 1 is hereby declared non est and the court below is directed to proceed with the trial of the eviction suit from the stage where it could be as if the O.P. No. 1 was never a party to it. The present order could not be prejudice to the case of the O.P. No. 1 if he has preferred a suit before any competent court. The Court wants to remind the learned Munsif, I, Gaya that Eviction Suit No. 10 of 2005 is older by four years and the very purpose of filing the suit could be defeated if the suit is not disposed of at the - 2 - earliest. It is high time that the court below buckles its belt up and decides the question of eviction within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this present order before it. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)