IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Rev. No. 910 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 21, 2011 Anand and 7 others .............................. Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana ........................ Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Gorakh Nath, Advocate for the petitioners. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 10.3.2011 whereby the petitioners have been summoned to face the trial under Sections 148/341/307/302 IPC. Counsel for the petitioners has argued that the charge has been framed without passing a speaking order. Subsequently, the challan has been presented and all the documents have been gone into while framing the charge. No merits. Dismissed. 21.4.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE