IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11871 of 2008 1. Deepak Kumar, Son of Shiv Nandan Mahto @ S. N. Mahto. 2. Shiv Nandan Mahto @ S.N. Mahto, son of late Mangal Mahto. 3. Bimla Devi, wife of Shiv Nandan Mahto @ S.N.Mahto. 4. Sandeep Kumar Son of Shiv Nandan Mahto @ S.N.Mahto. All are residents of Mohalla- Indira Nagar, Sector-22, Makan No. 22/141, Police Station-Gajipur Police Chauki, District- Luknow(U.P.)At present resident of Mohalla- Jankipuram, Mariyabu, Quarter No. E/2/682 Sector-8, District- Luknow(U.P)..................................................................Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Mamta Kumari, Wife of Deepak Kumar, D/O Sri Shivjee Mahto, Mohalla- Bakerganj, Police Station- Laheria Sarai, District- Darbhanga...........................................................Opposite Parties. ----------- 3. 05.05.2010. No one appears for the petitioners. However, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and the counsel for the State are in appearance. In the present application, the order of cognizance dated 04.06.2003 by which the cognizance has been taken in Laheria Sarai P.S. Case No. 241 of 2002 under Sections 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act has been challenged. It is submitted on behalf of the opposite party no.2 that after obtaining bail in the matter, the petitioners are not appearing as a result of which their bail bonds have already been cancelled. 2 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that by the order under challenge dated 04.06.2003 the cognizance has only been taken against the petitioner nos. 1 and 2. Hence the present application is not maintainable on behalf of the petitioner nos. 3 and 4. Since the order of cognizance is dated 04.06.2003 and the present stage of the case is not available before this Court hence, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. This application is dismissed. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)