IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2008 / 14TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 11401 of 2008(G) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN IA 257/08 IN OS.169/2007 of SUB COURT,KOTTARAKKARA .................... PETITIONER: ------------ PANKAJAKSHI AMMA, AGED 53 YEARS, D/O.LEKSHMI AMMA, KUZHIVELIL VEEDU, NADUKUNNU MURI,MELILA VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.V.JOJO RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. LEKSHMI AMMA, D/O.KALYANI, KUZHIVELIL VEEDU, NADUKUNNU MURI, MELILA VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK. 2. KAMALAKSHI AMMA, D/O.KALYANI, KUZHIVELIL VEEDU, NADUKUNNU MURI ¦ MELILA VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK. 3. KOCHUKRISHNA PILLAI, S/O.KOCHUNARAYANA PILLAI, KUZHIVELIL VEEDU, NADUKUNNU MURI MELILA VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK. 4. RAGHAVAN PILLAI, S/O.KOCHUNARAYANA PILLAI, KUZHIVELIL VEEDU, NADUKUNNU MURI MELILA VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK. 5. GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI, S/O.KOCHUNARAYANA PILLAI, KUZHIVELIL VEEDU, NADUKUNNU MURI MELILA VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN,J. ------------------------------------------------ W.P.C. No 11401 of 2008 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 3rd April 2008 JUDGMENT This writ petition is preferred against the order of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Kottarakkara in I.A. No 257 of 2008 in O.S. No 169 of 2007. The above application was filed to allow the petitioner to take away two almirahs and one sewing machine from the plaint schedule item No.1 family house. The court below considered the question and held that at this stage it cannot be permitted because the question is with respect to the partibility of the property. I am not going into the other details because it may affect the contentions of one of the parties. The court below has correctly observed that if at all the petitioner has got such a claim over the movables it is premature to decide the same at the present stage with the available evidence. So leaving open the contention of the writ petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- M.N. KRISHNAN Judge 03/04/2008 en [true copy]