i ' $ihgie Benéh IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH Afr BILASPUR w. P. (S) No. L\\%%;I ' OF 2002: v v("‘ Staw Ku. We: Bhagat, §/o. Shri / ii/ Jag Mohan Bhagat, aged ‘ahmlt ‘ 26 years, High School Chandeli, PETITIONER Block—Charama, Distrid Kanker, (c. G.) ‘VERsus f) :1‘. State of Chhattisgarh,_ Through g The Secretary, RESPONDENTS ’ Department of Panehayut 8b Rural j Development, D.K.S. Bhawa‘n, Mantralaya, Raipur (C. G.) 2, WChie-f Executive Offirm'. ‘ Kanker, District—Kanker (C. ’G.) 3. r/The Principal, ‘ High School Chandeli, DiStrict— Kanker, (Ci G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TH_E_ ' CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner begs to submit as underz~ mmw?(s)€(83z mwqérgaia) 111 2007 WWW ammm m W m WW§@W §§ aifd'q m $3 : HGN"BE.E SHRE’ JUSTK‘E E’RETINKER DIWAKER 31.8‘2GQ'9 Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the patition‘er‘ Shm' Vivek Shamm, PL. for the State. Challenge in the present petition 1's to the order dated 31.7.2009 passed by the respondent No.2 by which the petitioner who is working as Shiksha Karmi Grace—II has been transferred from Govt. High School, Chandeii to Middle School Gondahur, Pakhanjur, ..\ Block Pakhanjur, Distt. Kanker. Contention of the counsel fcr the petitioner is that in her appointment letter itself it was mentioned that the petitioner would be on probation for two years in the school where she is being appointed and her services are not transferable during that period. He further submits that the Shiksha Karmis are not being transferred by the government and therefore the order impugned is bad in the eye of law. . On the other hand, counsel fpr the State fairly submits that the matter consideration requires consideration ty the competent authority and therefore the petitioner may file a representation before the K respondent No.2 and the same would be considered in accordance with law. To this proposition of the f§tate counsel, counsel for the petitioner showed his agreement. However, he prays for an interim protection till the representation of the petitioner is decided by the authorities concerned. mm 1T1 209 WWW EHWM§ $31‘mm Accordingly the petition is d the petitionsr makes a representa‘. within abiperiod of ten clays from i order, the authorities concerned further period of three weeks from t order impugned shall be kept in at Detitipnar. > sposed of with a direction that if .ion to the authorities concerned he date of receipt of copy of the shall decide the same Within a he date of its receipt. Till then the yeVance so far as it relatea to the mm (We) WW