IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10066 OF 2010 Raosaheb Kondiram Kamble & anr. ... PETITIONERS VERSUS Ramchandra Sahebrao Satpute & anr. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri Ajit Kadethankar, Advocate for the petitioners ..... CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 25th October, 2010 PER COURT : 1. An order passed by the trial Court, appointing the Court Commissioner for local inspection is subjected to challenge in this petition. Considering the interlocutory nature of the order passed by the trial Court, no interference is called for in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner may have liberty to raise objection to the Court Commissioner’s report and may also have liberty to call the Commissioner for examination or cross-examination. The trial Court is expected to consider the objections those would be raised by the petitioner to the report and deal with the same while disposing of the suit. Writ Petition stands rejected. R.M. BORDE JUDGE fmp/wp10066.10