- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION NO.215 OF 2007 IN APPLICATION NO.507 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1450 OF 2006 Santoshkumar S.Roy ..Applicant Vs. The State of Mah. & Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.Aslam Shaikh Advocate for Applicant Mrs.A.S.Pai APP for State ... CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 05, 2007 DATE : OCTOBER 05, 2007 DATE : OCTOBER 05, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant came to be granted furlough by this Court. While granting furlough, a condition came to be imposed on the applicant that he shall furnish local surety. The applicant is seeking modification of the said condition. It is stated that the applicant is unable to furnish local - 2 - surety i.e. from Pune and he is willing to furnish surety from the State of Bihar. We are of the opinion that no case is made out to modify the earlier order and allow the applicant to furnish surety from Bihar. However, it is made clear that if it is not possible for the applicant to furnish local surety from Pune, the applicant is at liberty to furnish surety anywhere from the State Maharashtra. As and when the applicant is able to furnish such surety, the applicant be released on furlough on the usual terms and conditions. 3. Application is disposed of. [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]