IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23863 of 2008 RAJEEV KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 22.09.2008 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offence under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is not a named accused, however he has been implicated in this case on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused namely, Ritesh Kumar. It is further submitted that during investigation no alleged looted article was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Besides the above, it is submitted that the petitioner is a minor which would be evident on perusal of the admit card issued by the Central Board of Secondary Education, New Delhi. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the state is not in position to refute the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner. Having considered the submissions, as noticed above, and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within - 2 - a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, namely, Rajeev Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Digha P.S.Case No. 188 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)