IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA TEST SUIT No.1 of 2003 SMT.MAYA SINHA Versus NEERAJ KUMAR SINHA & ORS. with TEST SUIT No.1 of 2005 NEERAJ SINHA & ORS. Versus SMT.MAYA SINHA & ANR. ----------- 62/ 02.04.2010 Learned counsel submits that on the first page of judgment dated 23.03.2010, the spellings of the names of defendant nos.2 and 4 of Test Suit No.01 of 2003, who are plaintiff nos.2 and 4 of Test Suit No.01 of 2005, are not correct, as it should have been Harshit Sinha and Vineet Sinha, respectively. He also avers that defendant no.3 of Test Suit No.01 of 2003, who is plaintiff no.3 of Test Suit No.01 of 2005, namely Rachita Sinha is the daughter of Neeraj Kumar Sinha and not the son of Neeraj Kumar Sinha. Learned counsel further states that the spellings of the names of defendant nos.2 and 4 of Test Suit No.01 of 2003, who are plaintiff nos.2 and 4 of Test Suit No.01 of 2005, have been miss-spelt in the said judgment. It is also submitted that in the fourth line at page no.16 of the said judgment the word ‘nay’ has been wrongly typed before the word ‘manner’, although it should have been ‘any’. Learned counsel is correct. Let the said judgment be modified accordingly. harish/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )