Criminal Misc.-M No. 19840 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 19840 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 3.11.2011 Jyoti .. Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Munish Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G. S. Brar, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Vinay Puri, Advocate for the complainant. ... Rajesh Bindal J. While issuing notice of motion, following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner were noticed: “Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been named in the FIR got recorded by the father of Nazia, who had run away with the brother of the petitioner and solemnised marriage against the wishes of her parents. Both got protection from this court vide order dated 22.6.2011 in Criminal Misc. No. M-19159 of 2011. The petitioner had nothing to do in the love affairs of his brother with the daughter of the complainant. Both of them are happily residing after marriage.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation. He further submitted that the boy in the present case is living with his wife at his in-laws' house, i.e., parents of the wife. Criminal Misc.-M No. 19840 of 2011 [2] Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from SI-Amarjit Singh, did not dispute the aforesaid facts. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 6.7.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 3.11.2011 mk