IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 928 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 6.5.2009 Sukhnandan Singh .. Petitioner v. Gurmej Singh .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Yogesh Aneja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M. K. Upneja, Advocate for the respondent. .. Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though initially, he was instructed to state before the Court that he was ready and willing to pay the decretal amount to the respondent. However, thereafter the petitioner is not responding inspite of repeated calls by him. A perusal of order dated 6.3.2009 shows that notice of motion was issued only on the statement of counsel for the petitioner regarding willingness of the petitioner to pay the decretal amount. As the petitioner is not ready and willing to pay the decretal amount, the petition is dismissed. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 6.5.2009 mk