IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.203 of 2010. Decided on: March 16, 2010 Bali Ram ….. Petitioner. Versus H.P.M.C. and others …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. B.N. Mehta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ajeet Saklani, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure P-1 order of transfer dated 14th January, 2010. It is submitted that the petitioner had already submitted Annexure P-6 application for retirement under VRS scheme. Still further, it is submitted that in any case the petitioner has around only one year to retire from service. Yet another contention is that both the petitioner and his wife are under medical treatment and hence, transfer at this stage would cause severe hardship to the petitioner. It is for the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the first respondent. In the event of the petitioner filing an appropriate representation within a period of one 2 month from today, the matter will be duly considered by the first respondent and appropriate order shall be passed in accordance with law expeditiously. It is made clear that if the petitioner cannot be retained at the present station, the first respondent shall take a decision on the application for retirement under VRS scheme . Till such orders are passed by the first respondent, interim order passed by this Court will continue. The Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 16, 2010 (Justice R.B. Misra), (rks) Judge.