FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.900 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.900 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.900 OF 2006 Mahendra Jaswant Patel ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Shekhar A.Ingawale for the applicant. Mr.A.S.Shitole APP for the State. Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Date : 24.4.2006. PC 1. Heard both sides. Rule. By consent, rule made returnable forthwith. Leave to amend the surname of the applicant. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2. I have seen the certified copies of the orders. It appears to be the correct position that the order passed in Criminal Revision Application 163/99 has an error in so far as the discharge ought to have been given to the accused persons in respect of RCC No.1/1989 to : 2 : 3/1989. It appears that the mistake has crept in because judgment and order was passed on the same day in companion matter bearing Criminal application no.162/1999 and is probably copied by the Stenographer without making necessary changes. This position is fairly conceded by the APP. Certified copies of the judgment and orders passed in Criminal Application No.163/1999 and 162/1999 are taken on record and marked "X" and "X-1" for identification. In the circumstances, rule made absolute in terms of prayer clause-(a). (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J)