IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. ORDER S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO.2172/2006 Jagram Meena. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. 01.02.2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Shri Laxman Meena, for the petitioners. Shri Arun Sharma, Public Prosecutor. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that notice (Annexure-3) issued under Section 344 is vague and it is not specified in the notice as to which part of the testimony constitutes the offence. So far the above statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner is concerned the petitioner is at liberty to raise the aforesaid objections in reply to the notice that the notice is vague. In the facts and circumstances subject to the above this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of. The petitioner is directed to appear before the court concerned on or before 3rd March 2008. (DALIP SINGH),J. Ramchandrkhatri,PS