IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 10045 of 2003 DATE OF DECISION: July 13, 2010 Harbans Singh and another .........PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab and others ......RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present: Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. B.S. Chahal, DAG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus issuing directions to the respondents to pay equal pay and allowances to the petitioners, which the counter-parts of the petitioners are getting. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the services of the petitioners have already been regularized and cause of action does not survive. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has filed a para wise reply in Court, which is taken on record. 4. As per the reply, services of the petitioners have been regularized during pendency of the petition. 5. The petition is disposed of as infructuous on the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner. 13.07.2010 (AJAI LAMBA) shivani JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?