1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Contempt Petition No. 43/2009 (The Khan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. VERSUS Kamal Kishor Bhikulaji Kediya & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri G.S. Bapat, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : MARCH 24, 2009. It is the case of the petitioner that though the High Court had recorded a statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent no.7 to the First Appeal No.473/2007 that the respondent no.7 will not create any third party interest in the suit property, the respondent has created the same on 30.01.2008. I have perused the order passed by the High Court on 27.06.2007 in First Appeal No.473/2007. The Court had issued notice making the same returnable within four weeks and then recorded a statement made by the counsel for the respondent no.7 to that appeal that respondent no.7 2 will not create any third party interest during the period of four weeks. It appears that though the matter was listed before the Court on a number of occasions thereafter, the order dated 27.06.2007 was not continued. This clearly shows that the undertaking/statement made by the counsel for the respondent no.7 before the Court on 27.06.2007 ceased to operate after the expiry of a period of four weeks. In any case, the proceedings under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 cannot be initiated against the respondents for the alleged acts averred in the contempt petition as the statement made on behalf of the respondent no.7 to the First Appeal No.473/2007 operated only for a period of four weeks. In the result, the contempt petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE APTE