L.P.A. No.976 of 2001 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 04.02.2009 Swatanter Swami and another .....Appellants versus The Haryana State through Collector and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL. Present : Mr.Vijay Singh, Advocate, for appellants. Ms.Ritu Bahri, DAG, Haryana. -.- UMA NATH SINGH, J. This order shall also dispose of the connected L.P.A. No.23 of 2002 (Ram Piari and others versus State of Haryana and another) as both these appeals are directed against the judgments of a learned Single Judge passed in various regular first appeals impugning same notification. Learned counsel for parties state that vide order dated 28.9.2005, a Division Bench of this Court remanded some identical LPAs to the Single Bench for a fresh consideration. Said order passed in LPA No.697 of 2001 reads as: “Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, the learned counsel for the appellants states that an identical matter i.e. LPA No.441 of 1985 (Nishan Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana and another) has been disposed of vide judgment dated December 16, 2004 and has been remanded to the learned L.P.A. No.976 of 2001 2 Single Judge for decision afresh, and that a similar order should be made in the present appeal as well. We accordingly allow the present appeal, set aside the judgment of the learned Single Judge, and remand the case to the learned Single Judge for decision afresh in accordance with law. To be heard alongwith RFA No.890 of 1993.” In view of the aforesaid, these LPAs also need to be allowed and thus, the impugned order is set-aside. Resultantly, these matters are remanded to the Single Bench for a fresh consideration in accordance with law. (UMA NATH SINGH) JUDGE 04-02-2009 (A.N.JINDAL) Mohinder JUDGE