IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH: HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5195 OF 2008 BETWEEN: Somu Rajeswari …. Petitioner AND Alapati Nageswara Rao (died) and others …. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5195 OF 2008 ORDER: Heard both sides. 2. At the request of the learned counsel for both sides, the revision itself is taken up for disposal. 3. This revision is made against the order dated 16-07-2008 in I.A. No.615 of 2008 in O.S. No.260 of 2004 passed by the learned IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur. 4. The revision petitioner is impleaded as defendant No.6 in O.S. No.260 of 2004 as per the impugned order. 5. Respondent No.6 herein, who is plaintiff in the suit, has filed the impugned application seeking to implead the revision petitioner as defendant No.6 in the suit. The claim of the petitioner is that he is unnecessarily sought to be impleaded in the suit, though there is no relief with regard to his claim over the property in question. 6. The Court below, after taking into consideration the respective submissions and having found that the claim of the petitioner would ultimately help in disposal of the main suit and the questions involved therein, allowed the impugned application. Aggrieved of the same, this revision is filed. 7. Having regard to the findings of the Court below, I do not find any reason in the impugned order, warranting interference by this Court. Hence, the revision is liable to be dismissed. 8. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J February 19, 2010 KTL