THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH C.R.P.No.2850 of 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 19-04-2010, passed in E.P.No.101 of 2009 in O.S.No.332 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri, wherein the application filed by the respondent herein under Order 21 Rule 46 of CPC for attachment of additional monetary benefit of the deceased Inti Prabhakar, who worked as conductor in APSRTC Mangalagiri Depot, lying in the hands of the Depot Manager, APSRTC, Mangalagiri, which is not exempted under Section 60 CPC, was allowed. Aggrieved thereby, the present application is filed. The respondent herein obtained a decree in O.S.No.332 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri, against Inti Prabhakar alone and the petitioners herein are the legal heirs of the said Inti Prabhakar. The petitioners herein, being the legal representatives of the deceased, were brought on record and the said E.P. was filed for attachment of additional monetary benefit of the deceased-judgment debtor. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the court below ought not to have ordered attachment of additional monetary benefit, as the additional monetary benefit is exempted from attachment under Section 60 (m) of CPC. On the other hand, it is the case of the respondent that under Section 60(m) CPC, an expectancy of succession by survivorship or other merely contingent or possible right or interest, is not liable for attachment, but the additional monetary benefit cannot come within the aforesaid proviso and, therefore, the court below has rightly ordered for attachment of the said amount. Under Section 60 of CPC, various items of salary are not liable for attachment and one of such item is Section 60 (m) of CPC. I am of the opinion that if the judgment debtor survives, his salary amount, which is liable to be attached, can be attached. In the instant case, the judgment debtor is no more. The additional monetary benefit is granted to the dependants of the deceased in lieu of compassionate appointment. If that be so, additional monetary benefit, which was paid in lieu of compassionate appointment, cannot be attached, as the additional monetary benefit is exempted under Section 60(m) of CPC. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the court below erred in allowing the said application and, therefore, the same is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed setting aside the order, dated 19-04-2010, passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri, in E.P.No.101 of 2009 in O.S.No.332 of 2007. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 12-08-2011 Prv