-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.424 OF 2007 APPEAL NO.424 OF 2007 APPEAL NO.424 OF 2007 Narhari Pandurang Gondale ...Appellant vs. Municipal Corporation of City of Pune ...Respondent Mr.P.J.Pawar for the Appellant CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : DECEMBER 19,2007. : DECEMBER 19,2007. : DECEMBER 19,2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Appellant. The Appellant is the original plaintiff. The Appellant-plaintiff filed a suit against the Respondent-Corporation for injunction. According to the case of the Appellant-plaintiff, he had obtained a permission from the Respondent-Corporation for carrying out repairs to the suit premises. The Corporation granted 15 days time. The permission was subject to no objection from the resident of the first floor. On 27th August 1992 the Officers of the Corporation demolished certain part of the suit premises. The demolition was carried out on the basis of notice issued by the Respondent-Corporation that the premises are in dilapidated and dangerous condition. 2. The courts below have recorded a concurrent finding of fact by holding that the action of the Respondent-Corporation was legal and proper. 3. After having heard the learned Advocates for the Appellant, I find that no substantial question of law arises. Second Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. -2- JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE