IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH JULY 2008 / 25TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 21384 of 2008(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- K. VIVEKANANDAN, 21/3462, KOMMEDATH HOUSE, WEST VATTAKANIAR, MEENCHANDA,KOZHIKODE 673 018. BY ADV. SMT.K.A.ANGEL TREENA RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY) KOZHIKODE. 2. THE COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP. BY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. BEJOY CHANDRAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No.21384 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this court praying that order may be passed on Ext.P1 representation extending the benefit of one time settlement scheme to the petitioner in the light of Ext.P2 and a direction is sought to issue to the petitioner statement of liability under one time settlement scheme. Ext.P2 gives the details of the amnesty scheme, which is brought into force with effect from 1.4.2008. 2. Learned Government Pleader points out that petitioners may not be entitled to any relief on the cause of action pleaded in the writ petitioner, because Ext.P1 is not in the form which is prescribed for availing the benefit of one time settlement scheme. 3. I see force in the contention of the learned Government Pleader. If the petitioner is desirous of availing the benefit of the amnesty scheme, petitioner has to apply in the proper form. In such circumstances, while dismissing the writ petition, it is made clear that it will not stand in the way of the petitioner applying for the WPC.21384/2008. 2 benefit of the scheme in the prescribed form within the time provided therein. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb