THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.28263 of 2010 Date:15.11.2010 Between: Smt.Guntupalli Venkatasubbamma ..... Petitioner AND The District Collector, Guntur and others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri G.Pedda Babu Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4: Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies Counsel for Respondent No.5: -- The Court made the following: ORDER: The petitioner, who is the Sarpanch of Gottipadu Village, Prattipadu Mandal, Guntur District, filed this writ petition feeling aggrieved by the action of respondent No.3 in appointing respondent No.5 as Implementing Agency in addition to the existing Implementing Agent, by name, Smt. Guntupali Naga Lashmi. The petitioner pleaded that respondent No.3 has appointed respondent No.5 without following the procedure envisaged in G.O.Ms.No.94, Education (SE-PROG-I) Department, dated 25.11.2002. The petitioner has further averred that as per the procedure prescribed in the said G.O., the Panchayat Secretary shall arrange a meeting to be attended to by the Sarpanch, all ward members, the parents, all the self-help groups of the Village and select the best among them as Implementing Agent and that respondent No.3 has given a complete go-by to this procedure. The petitioner has claimed that she has sent two representations to respondent No.1 and that these representations have not been attended to by the latter. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the record, I am of the opinion that respondent No.1 needs to look into the grievance of the petitioner as stated to have been espoused in her two representations. The learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to state as to when these representations were sent to respondent No.1. If such representations have been received, respondent No.1 shall cause necessary enquiries made into the manner of appointment of respondent No.5 and if he feels that the procedure referred to above has not been followed, he shall take remedial measures after giving notice to the concerned parties, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.36058 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 15th November, 2010 Note: Issue CC in one week. (B/o) GHN