CORAM‘. HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON’BLE SHRI MANENDRA M. SHRIVASTAVA, J. Appeliant Claimant Smt. Bisouni Bai, Wio Shri Dhanush Ram Sahu, aged about 40 years, R/o Vinage Mehna Police Station, ’ Nandghat, Tah. Navagah, Distt. Durg. VERSUS Mushu, S/o Patiya Swami, Caste- Dewar, aged about 31 years, Viiiage —- Kumripatti, P.O. Singayam Punri, Tirppthur Nagar, Distt.. Shivamangai (Tamiinadu) present address - C/o Kamai Kumar Jain, S/o Ratanlai, Sadar Bazar, Bhatapara, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) (Driver) P. Bejoo, S/o Ponnu Swami; R/o Parmyakandu Piroun Road, Kumar Manglam; Post Office Tiruchengotu, Distt. Namkai (Tamil Nadu) (Owner) Kama! Kumar Jai, S/o Ratan Lai Jain, aged about 4§ years, R/o Sadar Bazar, Bhatapara, Tahsil Bhatapara, Distt. Raipirr. Attorney Hoider by Shri P. Beioo, Sfo Ponnu Swami, owner Vehicle I No.T.N.28U/9393 (Owner). United lndia lnsurance Company Limited 164, N. Kumar Complex, Tiruohengotu, Distt. Namkal ‘W (Tamilnadu) (insurer). Respandentso HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH Misc. Appeal N0. 771 Of 2005. Appeal under Section 173 0f the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Present : None for the appeliant. Shri GS. Patel, counsel for respondent No.4. ORDER (1 1‘“ December, 20(19) The foHowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appeltant. 2)“ ‘ As there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of o prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution, Sd/- Sdl— ! j Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Chief Justice“ l subbu Judge