-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1290 OF 2006 Nandkumar R. Gaikwad and Ors. ... Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr. Indrajeet Joshi for the applicants. Smt. A.S. Pai, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the respodnent. CORAM: KSHITIJ R. VYAS, C.J. DATE: APRIL 07 , 2006 . P.C. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicants as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, I see no reason to entertain this successive application for bail preferred by these applicants who, along with other 14 accused, are charged for the alleged offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 326, 302, 323, 324 and 504 of Indian Penal Code. They have previously applied for bail before the II Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, who released some of the accused and later on before this Court whereby this Court also released the remaining accused except the present three applicants. -2- 2. The present applicants have filed an application before this Court being Criminal Application No. 6762 of 2005 and since this Court was not inclined to grant the relief, the applicants withdrew the said application on 23rd November, 2005. In this view of the matter, in the absence of any changed circumstances, I see no merit in this application. It is rejected accordingly. CHIEF JUSTICE