THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.27456 of 2010 DT.08.11.2010 Between: Smt.Kambam Chinna Nirmalamma … Petitioner And The State of A.P., rep.by District Collector, Kadapa and others … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.M.N.Narasimha Reddy Counsel for respondents: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following ORDER: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of Acs.8.00 of land in Survey No.937 of Chinna Chouk Revenue Village, Kadapa Mandal and District, pending adjudication of the validity of re-survey conducted by respondent Nos.2 to 6 on 25.02.2005. I have heard Sri M.N.Narasimha Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, and perused the material. The petitioner claims to be the owner of Acs.8.00 of land in Survey No.937. It is the pleaded case of the petitioner that at the instance of certain third parties, when the respondents sought to survey the land, she filed W.P.No.23523 of 2004 for a mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in seeking to re-survey the land as illegal and that when the said writ petition was pending, the survey authorities have surveyed the land and submitted a report to the District Collector stating that the land in Survey No.937 is a patta land and that the petitioner is in occupation of Acs.6.00 in Survey No.919/1 and Acs.2.00 in Survey No.937. That challenging the said re-survey, she filed O.S.No.144 of 2006 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Kadapa for declaration that the boundaries shown in the re- survey and the plan prepared by the survey authorities on 05.03.2005 is illegal. The said suit is pending. The immediate cause of action for the petitioner to file the present writ petition is that when the paddy crop is ripe for harvesting over Acs.5.00 of land, respondent Nos.2 to 6 at the instance of labourers, entered the land, measured, planted stones, trampled and spoiled the paddy crop. In my opinion, the present writ petition cannot be entertained because the alleged action of the respondents is a consequence of re-survey conducted, in which, it was allegedly found that the petitioner is in possession of Acs.6.00 of land in Survey No.919/1, which admittedly does not belong to her. However, it is the case of the petitioner that the entire extent of Acs.8.00 of land is situated in Survey No.937. Inasmuch as the petitioner has already filed O.S.No.144 of 2006 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Kadapa questioning the very re-survey proceedings, it is appropriate for the petitioner to approach the said Court with an appropriate application to protect her interests over the property in dispute. Therefore, this writ petition filed raising disputed questions of fact cannot be entertained. In view of the apprehension expressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that by the time his client approaches the civil Court, the respondents may spoil the whole crop and the further fact that the Advocates of the civil Court are said to be on strike, the parties are directed to maintain status quo in all respects relating to the land in question, for a period of two weeks. Subject to the above direction, the writ petition is dismissed, without going into the merits of the case, with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedies as indicated above. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.Nos.35057 and 35058 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief are disposed of as infructuous. (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Date: 08.11.2010. VGB