S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9593/2008 Rukhsana Bano Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others Date of order : 17.02.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. Arjun Purohit for the petitioner. Mr. Govind Suthar on behalf of Mr. R.L.Jangid for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that she made a representation ventilating her grievance to the respondent State vide representation Annex.6 dated 3.11.2008 but the same has not yet been decided. There can be no reason for the respondents delaying the decision on such a representation. In my view, it would be more appropriate to direct the respondents to consider and decide Annex.6 representation filed by the petitioner within two months from the date of producing the certified copy of this order strictly in accordance with law. With these directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp S.B.Civil Misc. Stay Petition No. 16471/08 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9593/2008 Date of order : 17.02.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. Arjun Purohit for the petitioner. Mr. Govind Suthar on behalf of Mr. R.L.Jangid for the respondents. Since the writ petition itself has been disposed of, the stay petition also stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp