In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 736 of 2009 Date of decision: September 16, 2009 Amar Kaur and others .. Petitioners Vs. Nirmla and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Manish Kumar Singla, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 3. Mr. P.K. Garg, Advocate for the respondent No.2. A.N. Jindal, J The petitioners have invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for setting aside the order dated 10.1.2009 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Moonak. Both the parties agree that the petitioners are to pay court fee but they would pay it only qua their ½ share and they are also not bound to pay the court fee on the subsequent sale deeds. Under these circumstances, this revision petition is disposed of with the observations that the petitioners would pay the court fee qua their ½ share of the property (i.e. the relief claimed) and qua the sale deed executed by Reshma in favour of Nirmla. September 16, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge