IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.305 of 2009 MADAN SINGH SON OF LATE KALI SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BAIRON, P.S. SIMRA (KUTUMBA) DISTRICT AURANGABAD (BIHAR) Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE BIHAR PATNA 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE MAGADH ZONE, GAYA. 4. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE MAGADH REGION, GAYA. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AURANGABAD (BIHAR) 6. THE OFFICER IN CHARGE MAHANDIA POLICE STATION DISTRICT AURANGABAD. 7. DUDHESHWAR RAI SON OF LATE BRAHAMDEO RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BAIRON, P.S. SIMRA DISTRICT AURANGABAD. AT PRESENTLY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JASOIYA, NEAR (AIRSEL TOWER), P.S. AND DISTRICT AURANGABAD (TOWN) ----------- 05. 13.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner who the informant in Criminal case in question is that despite conviction and sentence of the respondent no. 7 in Sessions Trial No. 105 of 1980/79 of 83 as per judgement dated 27th of July 1996 followed by dismissal of the Criminal Appeal no. 277 of 1985 as also the Special Leave Petition 1408 of 1996 before the Supreme court as stated in paragraph 5 of the writ petition, respondent no. 7 is not being apprehended to undergo the sentence. Learned counsel for the State submits that steps have been taken and the processes have been issued under Sections 82 and 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and other steps have also been taken. Considering the submission of the parties, this court is not inclined to interfere in the matter at this stage, however, the trial court may take all possible steps permitted under the law against the respondent no. 7 so that he may be apprehended and undergo sentence. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)