IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18308 of 2010 SARVESH RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 08.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 10.2.2010 in a case registered under Sections 348, 341, 323, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioner that petitioner gave a rod blow on the head of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is a land dispute between the parties and the injury is simple. Moreover the alleged occurrence is of 26.5.2009 whereas the injured informant was examined by the doctor on 27.5.2009 and the age of the injury had been given as within six hours. This contention of the petitioner has not been controverted by learned counsel for the State. However, learned counsel for the State submits that the doctor has deferred the opinion with regard to nature of injury. Considering the contradiction between the alleged time of occurrence, and the age of injury given in injury report and the land dispute, let the petitioner, namely Sarvesh Rai be released on bail on furnishing 2 bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 161 of 2009. Anand Kr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)