1N THE HIGH comm” OF mwmwmwsa AT JABALPUR vw.p. No.73‘3 OF 199g _Heeralal Yadav & another - Versus a MP3E1ectricity Board & athers BESPONDENTS. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226[227 5F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUING A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIQRARI, MANDMUS ETC ETC. AND ALSO FOR ISSUING NECESSARY DIRECTIONS / e. PETITIONER5 Partlculars of the Petltloners : 1- Heeralal Yadav S/o Late Shri Munnalal Yadav,V aged about 26 years, resident of Jamalpara, ard No. 19, Rajnandgaon (MP) ' RaJeev snukla s/o late bhn D K. bhukla, aged about 25 years, reS1dent of Bramhanparam Rajenandgaon (MP). ,articular§-of the Respondents : F 1- MP nlectr1c1ty Board, hrough 1ts $ecretary, 5hakt1 Bhawan, Rampur, JABALPUR. 2‘ The Executxve Engineér(0&m). Rajnandgaon Dn., MP lectr1c1ty Board Rajnandgaon. 8* Partlculars of the crders agalnst whlch the petltlonei § s made The petltloners are challenglng the order dt. 18 8 93 passed by the Executlve Englneer(O&M) Dn I MPEB, eBurg. The petltioners are-also challenglng the clrcular dt. 24‘3.93passed by the respondent Noe1. 4 . Delay 1n flllng the petltlon, 1f any, ane the explanatlon for 1t, 1f any . iNot appllcable. . . W , , 1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTI$GARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W.P.’ No. 739 OF 1996 Petitioncrs z aeralal Yadav 85 another Versus Respondents : MP Electn'city Board 8a Others None for the petitioners. None for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (4th April, 2006) 1. The matter was called for healing twice. On both occasions, none appealed nor any representation was made on behalf of the petitioners. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. / . ‘\ \ SATISH K. Sdl- AGNIHOTRI Judge H l