IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8070 of 2010 1. MD.SALIM son of Late Usman 2. Md. Sarfraz Ansari @ Laddan son of Md. Salim Both resident of Village-Khalishpur, P.S.-Kako, District- Jehanabad Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 12.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioner no. 1 being father-in-law and petitioner no. 2 being husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 498(A) and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation of physical and mental torture. However, the restitution suit on contest has been allowed which suggests that the complainant does not want to stay at the village home of the husband rather she want to stay at Gaya for which the petitioner submits that he is not capable for. Learned counsel for the complainant raises apprehension with regard to the behavior of petitioner no. 1. However, now the complainant is ready to go with the husband house if he keeps her with full dignity and honour. In that view of the matter both the petitioners are directed to be released on provisional bail for a period of six months. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let 2 the petitioners, namely (1) Md. Salim (2) Md. Sarfraz Ansari @ Laddan be released on provisional bail for a period of six months on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 675 of 2008 (Tr. No. 1026 of 2010). Let petitioner no. 2 and the complainant appear in the Court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gaya on 26th July, 2010 from where the husband will take the complainant to her matrimonial house. Learned S.D.J.M. Gaya will confirm the provisional bail on or before expiry of provisional bail if the matrimonial harmony is restored or if the complainant refuses to stay with the husband. Anand Kr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)