IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20820 of 2011 1. Niraj Rao S/O PREM NARAIN RAO, 2. PANKAJ RAO S/O PREM NARAIN RAO, 3. PREM NARAIN RAO S/O MAHENDRA RAO. ALL R/O VILLAGE-BAIRAGI, MATH, P.S. NAUTAN, DISTRICT-WEST CHAMPARAN. --PETITIONERS Versus The State Of Bihar --OPP.PARTY 2 19.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners are named accused in this Case relating to refusal to execute sale deed after taking consideration money and on demand using abusive words. There is counter version by way of Complaint Case no. 861 of 2009. Moreover, the case appears squarely covered by Jorgia Pentiah V. State of A.P.; 2009 (1) BCCR 153 (SC). Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks of communication of the order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, in Hajipur S.C./ S.T. P.S. Case no. 30 of 2010, 2 subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioners shall remain present before both the court below on each and every date for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. AAhmad ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)