1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.62/2004 In Writ Petition No.364/1997 (Decided) [Shri Ashok s/o Rambhau Dhule .vrs. The Chief Officer, Nagar Parishad, Anjangaon-Surji and others] ........................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................... ................................ Mr. N.R. Saboo, Advocate for the applicant, Mr. A.M. Deshpande, AGP for respondent nos. 2 to 4. .......... CORAM : K.J. ROHEE AND R.V. MORE JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 18, 2008. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. On 23.1.2001 an interim order was passed in several writ petitions including Writ Petition No.364/1997. It was directed by this Bench that the information as regards the petitioner therein should be sent by the Municipal Council to the Regional Director of 2 Municipal Administration for considering them for the appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher. It seems that after passing of the said order, the petitioner amended his petition. The pleadings as well as prayer clauses were amended. Prayer Clause (iii)(a) was to the effect that the court should be pleased to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner in the process of regularisation of adhoc teachers in the respondent Municipal Council. 3. By order dated 6.10.2003 writ petition no.364/1997 came to be dismissed by this Court. It seems that prayer clause (iii) (a) was not brought to the notice of this Court and hence the Court proceeded on the assumption that prayer clause 1 and 2 only were pressed. It has been brought to our notice that the Municipal Council did not forward the 3 papers relating to the present petitioner to the concerned authority and that is why the concerned authority did not consider the candidature of the petitioner. 4. In view of this, we find that order dated 6.10.2003 needs to be recalled. Accordingly, we do so and proceed to pass the following order : 5. The application is allowed. Writ Petition No.364/1997 is restored to file. Place the matter in the next week. JUDGE JUDGE asg