"^l'3S "!3'li? WMT PETITION ( S '> No. 7629 of2007 PARWATI BAI Yadav D/o Shri Mani Ram Yadav, Age about 60 years, Occupation - Service as permanent Gangman, R/o Shyam Nagar, Katora Talab, Raipur, Distt: Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS : (1) STATE OF CHHA''n'ISGARH Through 'its Secretary, Dspartment of Public Works, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD Sub Divisioii OfficerNo. 1 & 2, Distt: Raipur (C.G.) P.W.D. Sub (3) SUB DIVISIONAL OFFI •ci^Tr'r'i? •D ^/X^I^, DivisionNo. 2, Distt: Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjl OFINDIA Shri Yogesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. ihri S.K.Mishi'a. Paue! Law\'er for the Sfats/respondents. »nd (Passed on 02"°day of January, 2008) Sy fhis petitioa, the petitioner, vAo has worked as Gangmaa (permanent), seeks a relief that the petitioner beine permanent ganginan be retired at the age of 62 years in accordance with the Chhattisgarh Shashkiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-A.^i) Adhimyani, 1967 (for s'hort 'the Act, 1967') read with Fundameatal Rule (for short 'F.R.') 56 Accordina to leamed counsel for the petitioner, tfae petitioner attained the status ofperaianait employee, as defined under Rule 2(c) ofthe ClAattisgarh (Workcharged and Contmgency Paid Employees) Pension Rules, 1979 (for short 'the Rules, 1979), framed under Article 309 of the Coastitutioii of Jndia. After havins attained fne status of the permaiient employee, the petitioner would retire on attaming the age of 62 years on superannuation uaderthe provisions ofthe Act, 1967. Leamed couasel appeariag for the petitioner would submit fliat the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the dedsion oftliis Court passed on 4,<th Januarv, 2007 in W.P. No. 10 Others) and other coruiected matters. 4. Learaed counsel appeariag for the respondents/State does not dispute the submission made by leamed coimsel for the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner, who is permanent gangman, is entitled to retire oa attainine tlie aee of 62 veare in accordaiice with tlie Act, 1967. Tlie petition is accordingly allowed, s-abject to verification ofthe facts. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge B S@s 1 ^