IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.3123 of 2011 Date of decision : 21.4.2011 Suresh Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Ms.Alka Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The only grievance that has been raised by the petitioner is that no notice was given prior to terminating his services. On due consideration of the matter, I am of the opinion that such a notice was not required. The petitioner was employed as a Guest Faculty Teacher purely on contractual basis and during the course of employment he absented himself on various occasions. He being a Guest Faulty Teacher was merely working under an arrangement set up by the State to tide over its problems of shortage of faculty and since the services of the petitioner were purely contractual, the same could be dispensed with without issuance of notice and by taking into consideration his conduct. No ground to interfere. C.W.P.No.3123 of 2011 -2- Dismissed. 21.4.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss