IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 114 of 2011 (S/B) Dhiraj Kumar Saini ….…… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ……….Respondents Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel for the State / respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. B.D. Pandey, Advocate for respondent No. 3. Date of Judgment: 13.07.2011 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. BARIN GHOSH, C.J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the writ petitioner seeks extension of time to file supplementary affidavit. The request is rejected. 2. Proceeding on the basis that the Government, on 22nd June, 2002, decided that the post reserved for female will not be carried forward and the same will be supplied by available male candidates, the present writ petition has been filed, in as much as, in the instant case, the post available for woman in the Other Backward Class has been carried forward. Learned counsel for Uttarakhand Public Service Commission has brought to our notice the subsequent Government Order dated 28th December, 2004, which specifically provides that such post shall be carried forward, at least, for three times. 3. We, accordingly, dismiss the writ petition. (Servesh Kr. Gupta, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 13.07.2011 13.07.2011 Amit