~p c^ r\ \ol.' C:3. fft IN IHE HIGH COURT O? JUDICAOTBE AI BILASTOR (CG) 1-TRIT PBTITION N0. •2-°b 3 O? 2004 ?^; /^ BETWEffl ^G^ r-^??- o ^^ . . . —i: .CCT-- Dilip K-mar Rahile S/o Na-yiuj i Rahile, aged about 43 years, ^; s,s^'. occupation •rorest Guard, posted at Rainga'Khar •porest Range, f ~S : 'EOrast Division KawarcTna Dis-fcrlct I&birdham (CG). tC' S ? ^ £-s 1y PEIITIGNER •>">x ,^^2. ' ^y '• •^f' •^ >€^.._-.-...:~"- \r~y^vVn.lon of Itidia, ^'•^P> drough -ti-ie Secretary Department of tersonal <''A " ant3 Trsining , Ministry of Home A^airs, New Delhi, .&' ''p^, ^•^lc^ 3. •^-^- '%® .'y The Director (SRS) Goveniment of Iidia Personnel Fublic Grievances and Patsion Mantralay, Personnel and 'iralnlng Department, IIIrd •E'loor, Lok Nayak ffiawan, Vay. Market, New D3lhi» Bie State o-f Gihattisgarh, 'lhrough -the Secretary Department of TOrest, Mantralgty, D.K.s.Bailding, Raipur (CG). Ihe State of Madhya Eradesh, Ihrough tihe Secretary Depar'tment o-F TOrest, Mantralay, vallabh Bhawan, BHOPAL (M"P) . Pradhan MuKhya 'van sanrakshak, dihat-tisgarh, Raipur . 6. Pradhan IWkhya Van sanrakshal':, Madhya Eradesh, ^ ftiopal (MP) '6'\ '/.\ ^tehe Divisional 'S'orest Qff:icer, 7*y^A ;5 •sorest Division, Kawardha, ?£?/O'':'y' Distr-ict Kabirdham (CG). RESPONDENTS WRTT PETITIO-I UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 O? mg COHSTI'IUTICN O? INDIA <caiS XI-HC-22 -3'St ^qiqRPl, 'S^FIS, faclK-iy IIICTI sniicfi an^?T 'q^% ^s-f- t^S'> fa'biiSI" •^ 200'?: 311^1 %I R-ii.* sn^i sh*( ^I^I aii^i ^aiw ^iftd <h|t|tyl41-1 4|t(tfl •?'fe'zt ifat^K •^aiPgqsn^i petit^oner. Shri Ajit Singh, counsel for the Shri Dashrath Gupta, Panel Lawyer|fi yso Applieation (I.A.No.4823/04) for i Heard. The matter relateg to aUocation. submits fhat for the present ends ofjustiee| a representation a&esh before respondent as possible in accordance with law. Leamed State counsel has no objectj Having considered and without the case, in fhe opinion ofthis Court, ends gwen to fhe petitioner to make a gdevances before respnndent No.3 along| order, wiflun a fifteen, and on such shaU decide the same on its own meritsl possible preferabiy witfain a montfa fi-om (h|e It is made clear tfaat if any grievance still| remedy avaflable vmdei flie law. With fhe aforesaid observatioas, flus] Consequendy M.W.P.NO. 1852/20(f4 disposed of. er|forthe State. ufeent hearing is aBowed. Leamed counsel for the petitioner wifl be served if he is aUowed to make >.3, which shaB be considered as'earlv »n. expressmg detdiled repretentation any opinion on (he merits of ^fjustice wffl be sen'ed ifa dirsction is representation afresh raisii^ his |wi(h a copy of the petition and Ifais being filed, respondent No.3 in accordance with law as early as |e date of receipt of the representation. remains, the petitioner may avafl fhe Ipetition staads disposed of. & I.A.No.4849/2004 al^ stands A^l——- Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge