IN TOB HIQB C©BrRT @P JIIBieATlTBE AT BIIASPIIS (€•©•) WRIT PETITIQB N©.'^7». ©P2@@l BETWEBS Naad Rnniar fihardwaj s/e ^iri Ctehe^aa ©asBbardiiaj^ aged ateoat 3@ y®ars»Secretary, Qram Panchayat Maro^ Resideaat of ^illag®and Post. Mar@» Tahsil Nawagarii MstricbBarg, 1. 2<? 3. 4,' PETITICWER A N B 2fee Stafee @f CShhattisgarh^ tihr@agh ttee Seeretary BepauFtnent @f Panchayat, Mantralay^ ©•K<Buildlag, fiaipiir^ • -.... '.,.. ,.- -.. -. ",- ©olleetor(Panefeayat) Barg^ Bistrlet BBref* €feie£Bxecative @ffi©er» JaBpad-Panchayat.NawaGrarh, EiLstriet Burg* Sarpaneh^Gram Panehayat Mar@^ Ttoroath Haada Ra® sahu^ sarpaiich^ ©ram Paneliayat Naro» Tahsil Mawagaife district IBarg. Saresh RGuaar Tlwari, ©rarn Panehayat Seerefeary, Mar®, i-aifesil aaiiagarh Mstrict Biarg,' ^.- BBSP@IIB®ITS WRXT PETrTI©B1JRBBR ARCTCLES 226/227 ©PTHE et T^TS¥^E^"W^Wa(-"-!'"' " - >?,.. '.. A.^.-.'A.. ". r" XI-HC-22 ^^ ^ra<n<4, ^Ttlwt<o, I®i<vt}^y ^l^F^T K^iN^ ^^^w^? ^p-l^ll%%^^>.£^:.^.2/2^ "fes^" 08-03-2002 Heard Shri Diwakar with S^ for the petitioner and Shri Sanjay ^eneral for respondent NoJ and 2. The petitioner has in this pe in the nature of rnandamus directin^ respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to allow the petitioner to perform his duti^ Panchayat, Maro and respondent !s|o.5 be restrained from functionirig as Secretary. The petitioner has filed this permitt-Jng him to produce a docum^nt as document No.l which is the resoiution passed on 22.1.2002 respondent No.4 herein. It is stated in the applics^ presided by Sarponch of 6ram Panc| <^t<rfwL&<i <-i(*t<?ff"t'feE^<R(N^K ^^Pa^ ^^F ri Bharat Rajput, ieamed counsei Kumar Agrawal, Deputy Advocate Htion proys for issuance of a writ s on the post of Secretary/eSram applicoition I.A.No.1239/2002 for [by the <5ram Panchayat, Maro- tion that tiie said meeting was layat Maro a8id in the said meeting 11 panchas were present. The^ proposal no.3 was taken for consideration for reposting of th^ petitioner in the panchayat as [^^ ^.Ra^ XI-HC-22 "^? •^piRpr, ^-aiwi^ ^i^^t ^P^II-^^I^.L)..'B. .J^..7^^ ^ii^l^F f^FF^3^ ^^i^T'Hlict ..h' /. -,^, ^ao/Murthy panchayat karmi and the soid propj as per document No.l. LA.No. 1239/2002 is aliowed produce the said document. The document No.l shows thjst 4 respondent has passed the resoiution to repost the petition^r in the panchayat as panchayat karmi, In the circumstances, infructuous, If, for any reason this res41ution is not given effect to by respbndent No.4, the petitioner is ^t liberty to fite an application for appropriate relief before this Court.j Accordingly, the writ petitjon is disposed of wlth iiberty aforesaid. ^14fa<rll4 ^i^-^fe^ <fo^s< '^r3ipg5?%^r sal was passed with fuil majority The petitioner is permitted to th |the writ petition has become Sd/- Chief Justice |^"^fe4