IN THE HIGH OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 172 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Phaku s/o Babu 2. Abrar s/o Akhlakh, Both r/o Village : Sikarodha P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar 3. Fasat s/o Kalava Rao, R/o Village : Kheri Sikohpur, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar ……… Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Senior Superintendent of Police, District Haridwar. 2. Station House Officer, Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar. 3. Sri Rishipal Singh (H.C.P.) P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar …….. Respondents ……….. Petitioners’ counsel absent. Sri D.K. Sharma, G.A. respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Petitioners’ counsel absent. Sri D.K. Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Sri Sharma, the learned Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them now has become infructuous as the police after the completion of the investigation has filed charge-sheet against the petitioners before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 26.06.2006 26.06.2006 A