COUBT OF CHHATTISaAHH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS: W.P. {Cv) Np. 4007/2009 1. Deepak Tiwaii Aged about 32 years S/o Raai Kuniar Tiwad R/o Korar District Kaaker (C.G.). 2. Ram Kumar Tiwan Aged about 61 years S/o Late Mohaa LalTiwari Head Master, Middle School, Kokanpur District Kaaker (C.G. ) 3. Saroj Thvari, Aged about 59 years W/o Shri Ram Kumar Tiwari R/o Korar Distiict Kanker (C.G.), 4. Smt Rashmi Pathiak Agcd about 29 years, W/o Vikas Pafhak R/o of Bhanpuri District Bastar (C,G.), 5. Srat Seenia Bajpai Aged about 35 years, W/o Satish Bajpai R/o Komia Khan Distdct Mahasamuiid (C.G.). 6. Satish Bajpai Aged about 35 years S/o Shri Jageshwar Bajpai R/o Koina Khan Distdct Mahasamund (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh Through fhe Secretary Honie Department D.K.S. Bhawasi, Maiitralaya Raipur (C.G,). Station House Incharge Maliila Pollce Station Durg (C.G.). Arti Tiwari W/o Deepak Tiwari, Aged about 31 years R/o House no. 3-A, Street No. 39, Sector-5, Bhilai District Durg (C.G.). Senior Superintendent of PoUce Durg (C.G.). Precaa Rao Sub-Inspector, Mahila PoUce Station Durg (C.G.). Shii Subhash Paadey, Aged about 62 Years S/o Late Chaadra Deep Paadey R/o House no. 3-A, Street No. 39, Sector 5, BhUai Distt. Durg (C.G.). PETITION UNDER ARTICLB226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IIiDIA. (SB :Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) 6. Preseufc- Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, P.L. for the State. ^l^ ORAL- ORDER (Passedon 20/04/2010) By this petition under Article 226 of ttie Constitution of India, petitiouer has prayed for qushiaent of fhe crbiiiiial proceediag pendiag before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Durg ia crmiiual case No. 207/2009 and fhe First Infonnation Report. registered agamst fhe petitioner at fhe iastaoice of respondent No. 3 Ai'ti Tiwari. Mr. Varun Shaiiaa, leaoied counsel for fhe petitioners and Ms. Saiigeeta Mishra, P.L, for fhe State ai'e heard. At the out set both fhe parties fraakly admits tliat previously these petitioners had prayed for quashinent of First Information Report uuder Section 482 ofthe Code ofCrimmal Procedure, 1973 (ia short the Code) same has been disniissed vide order dated 11/8/09 ia Crimmal Misc. Petition No. 222/2009 by fhis Court. Order dated 11/8/09, copy of charge sheet aad order mipugned perused. By takiag cognizaace of the offence punishable under Sectiou 498A/34 of fhe Indian. Penal Code learaed Court below has not committed any iUegaUty warraiitmg aay issuaace ofwrit. Matter has already been eonsidered aiid decided ia Crimmal Misc. Petition No, 222/2009 by this Court vide order dated 11/8/09, I do not find aiiy substance in. fhis petition, Consequenfly, this petition is Uable to be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed. However, considering the rival contentions of fhe parties, Court below is directed to expedite tlie tdal aiid decide the case as early as possible preferable wifhm 6 mouths from fhe date of filmg of tlie copy of the order on behalf of tlie petitionex's, Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^