HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL W.P. No. 198 (MS) of 2003 (Old No. 11740 OF 1991) Uttara Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad ………. Petitioner. Versus Additional District Judge, Dehradun and others. …………. Respondents. Mr. K.S. Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Vashisht, Advocate for the respondent no.3. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Mr. K.S. Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Vashisth, Advocate for the respondent no.3. In this petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged mainly and primarily judgment passed by the leaned Additional District Judge delivered in terms of Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act for enhancement of compensation based upon the reference received by him from the Collector. Such a judgment and order is appeable. The writ petition is not maintainable. Counsel for the petitioner submits that in fact the petitioner has filed appeal against the said judgment. Writ Petition is dismissed on the ground of non-maintainability, but with liberty to the petitioner to keep prosecuting the appeal. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 7.7.2008 Rathour