1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Summons for Judgment No. 702 of 2004 in SUIT NO. 122 OF 2004 Mrs. Manda S. Panchmatia . . .... Plaintiff vs. M/s. Jayantilal Khandwala & Sons., & ors. . ... Defendants Ali Murtaza i/b. Law Charter for Plaintiff V. N. Kantawala i/b. Kantawala & Co., for defendant CORAM: S. U. KAMDAR J. Date: 28/9/2005 P.C. Both the parties to the present suit have tendered the consent terms duly signed by the parties and their respective advocates. Consent terms taken on record and marked “X” for identification. There will be decree in terms of the consent terms. Undertaking given in para 5 of the consent terms accepted. In view of the consent terms between the parties the learned Magistrate before whom the proceedings between the same parties, under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, being case No. 3916/S/05 is 2 pending shall dispose of the same in terms of the compromise. Suit disposed of in terms of the consent terms. minutes of the order. In view of the disposal of the suit Summons for Judgment does not survive and dismissed as infructuous. Refund as per rules. (S. U. KAMDAR J.) -x-