IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 5612 of 2007 Between: A.Ramesh S/o.Ankaiah Naidu R/o.No.576, Chatram village, Ponneri Taluk, Tiruvallur district, Tamilnadu. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer (Land Acquisition Officer) Tirupati, Chittoor District. 2 The District Collector, Chittoor, chittoor District. 3 Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Vice-Chgairman & Managing Director, Hyderabad 4 Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd., rep. by its Zonal Manager, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 5 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Land Acquisition, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of "Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned the notification in Roc.No.G2/3688/06, dt. 18.3.2006 published in Andhra Jyothi Telugu news paper on 25.3.2006, issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1984 in so far as it relates to the agricultural lands of the petitioner situated at Arur village, Sathyavedu Mandal, Chittoor District as being illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and to set aside the impugned notification and consequently the respondents be directed not to dispossess the petitioners in respect of the schedule lands mentioned in the notification and to pass such other and further orders that may be deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.V.MUNI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO. 5612 OF 2007 ORDER: Sri S.V.Muni Reddy, Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ___________ 11-12-2008 asp