/ /-• IN THEHIGH COURTOF JUDICATUREAT BILASPUR. (C.G.t W.P. N<? 7 ^ 8/2005 PETITIONBR: ^. »l-s-s" -'^^"•^ .-^e6N ^' p-yess-"-" ,, ^^ dated."-"re" VERSUS /"_Vijay Kuniar Ramteke Aged about 24 years S/0 Late Namdev Ramteke R/0 EWS 119 Padmanabhpur District Durg (C.G.) RESPONDENTS: , 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department of Education DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ^2. Director Directorate of Public Education, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ^ 3. Collector District Durg(Ch-hattisgarh) , 4. District Education Officer District Durg (Chhattisgarh) ^5. Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat Durg District Durg (Chhattisgarh) / 6. State of Madhya Pradesh Through Secretary Department of Education Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) /7. Directorate Directorate of Public Education Madhya Pradesh Bhopal (M.P.) /" ^r 8. Unionoflndia Through Secretary Human Resources Department ^ New Delhi NBTmON UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FQR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- XI-HC-78 3TT^r^>Tf^TW cTSTT3TR?T^TW ^l^dl sb^lcb 3^ "41<11c1<<, t$Tfl^^<o, {^Krll^iy ,T^^..C'^^t/^ ^ 200 3li^i ^5i<ft (^i^^) 5^n'^K^f^f3n^T 20.6.2006:- Shri Prateek Sharma, coun] Shri Ashutosh Kachhawahl to4. Shri Satish Gupta, counsel| Shri S.K. Beriwai, Standingl Heard. The grievance raised by t^e belongs to SC community and h| theGovernment Mode! Girls on 23-4-2000 white in service. 0] the death of his father, he mo(> appointment but no orders were Now, in the repiy filed bl mentioned that application ofthe| the competent authority. The Disf appiication for compassionate apd Ziia Panchayat, Durg who in Coijector, Durg. Copy of the sam^ Moreover, considering ti| compassionate appointment the dated 31st October 2000 had alret that if he satisfies eligibiiity criter| ground. In view of the above, the case of the petitioner and same appointment, the respondent^ turh <=bi^f<n41<ri ^i*4^iT^tel:^'<Ri<^i< ^3:rf^T3TT^?T sel for the petitioner. 3, Govt. Advocate for respondents No.1 |for respondent No.5. Counsel for respondent No.8. l^e petitioner in this writ petition is that he |s father was Upper Division Teacher in High|er Secondary School, Dyrg. He expired peath certificate is Annexure-P/2. After |ved an appiication for compassionate p^ssed on that appiication. ^ respondents No.1 to 4 it has been IpetJtioner is under consideration before trict Education Offjcer has forwarded the ^ointment to the Chief Executjve Officer, has forwarded the application to the ^ is Annexure-R/1. |ie application of the petitioner for IDirector Public Instructions vide order ^dy asked the Distnct Education Officer |on, he be appointed on compassionate r^spondents have already examined the has been fon^arded for compassjonate to ensure that the petitioner XI-HC-78 3^T ^iqicnq, ^Tfl^^Ko, ^1<H^< +11*1^1 s»»*1ic»t ^ 200 c&'O 3TT^TcraR?(^1 3TI^TcF)T^i<=b cTSTT3TT^T$h^icb Bgrve '^ y^ Q, ?^TT^T^f?cT3n^FT is appointed on compassionate gro the post and satisfying the eljgibilit^ The writ petition is disposed Consequently, M.(W.)P. N1 &1496/2006 aiso stand disposed oi Parties areentitled for certifi Gbi^F<n41Ti ^i^<nT^'tel:^'<Ri<^i< ^3rf^T3:n^r jnd, of-course, subject to availabiiity of criterion by the petitioner. of accordingly. >.4580/2005 and I.A. Nos.9658/2005 ^d copyofthisorder. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge