... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.162 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Mr S.J. Rairkar for the Appellants. Mr N.P. Deshpande for Respondent Nos.1 to 7. Mr G.S. Godbole for Respondent Nos.8 to 13. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : MAY 03, 2006. : MAY 03, 2006. : MAY 03, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Admit. Advocate appearing for the Respondents waives service. Taken up for hearing forthwith. The parties have arrived at compromise and consent terms duly signed by the Appellant Nos.1 to 4 and all the Respondents are annexed to the Civil Application No.778 of 2006. The Advocates appearing for the parties state that all the parties save and except the Applicant No.5, have duly signed the consent terms. The Advocates pointed out that the parties have understood the contents of the consent terms and the parties desire that the Second Appeal should be disposed of in terms of consent terms. In view of these statements, the Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of consent terms. Decree to be drawn accordingly. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE