THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.11239 of 2005 ORDER: The petitioner feels aggrieved by the notification, dated 14.03.2005, issued by the 1st respondent, proposing to sell a plot of land admeasuring 272.2 square yards, in premises bearing No.4-1- 71/7/1 of Naiduwada, Nirmal Municipality, Adilabad District. The 2nd respondent obtained loan from the 1st respondent and offered the said property, as security for repayment. The petitioner claims to have purchased an extent of 172.22 square yards of land, through sale deed, dated 15.09.2003. For one reason or the other, the 2nd respondent offered the property sold in favour of the petitioner also as security. Since the 2nd respondent committed default in payment of the loan, proceedings were initiated for sale of the property. The petitioner contends that the very creation of mortgage, vis-à-vis his property is untenable. On behalf of the respondents, it is stated that the 2nd respondent has since cleared the loan account, on 11.02.2009, and the entire documents, in relation to the mortgaged properties, were returned to him. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent. The petitioner, no doubt, had a grievance, as regards the proposal to sell the property purchased by him. The 2nd respondent was not at all justified in mortgaging the property that was sold to the petitioner. Be that as it may, the grievance of the petitioner stood redressed, on account of the fact that the loan has since been cleared by the 2nd respondent and the mortgage has been redeemed. Therefore, the Writ Petition is disposed of, taking on record, the communication, dated 02.03.2010, furnished by the 1st respondent, which is to the effect that the loan, in respect of which the property was mortgaged, has since been cleared. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.10.03.2010. GJ