IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1759 of 2008 SMT. JYOTI DEVI Versus DR. RAJ KISHORE LAL DAS & ORS ----------- 4. 27.11.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. All that has been done therein is that the wife of the plaintiff has been added as a co-plaintiff. The reasons for such exercise of discretion is also apparent from the perusal of the plaint itself where from paragraph no.39 onwards the wife’s role in the disputed land while contesting the mutation proceeding has been sought to be relied by the husband plaintiff for getting the relief. When there is a specific finding, right or wrong of the revenue authorities that the original plaintiff was in possession of the land through his wife as recorded in the order of the D.C.L.R., Benipur dated 11.1.2007, which of course was passed on an application contested by the wife of the plaintiff, now sought to be made as a co-plaintiff, the approach of the court 2 below in allowing the prayer of that wife for being added as a co-plaintiff under the impugned order does not suffer from any error. This civil revision application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/