si^^a^si^ssf"s!ssys'ss9 SINGLE 8ENCH /OT?2-- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.t WRIT PETITION fS) N0. 4i<&3 OF 2006 PETITIONER ..:<^ ..••"X8r'' .r>"'^' , ^•y^..^" ^y ../^^ -"^' ..-f'' .^'^v>\.. <^/ ^ RESPONDENTS ^.:'S?\ & y •^'•"'r-?. ¥^^ ^/f ^•y-^ »'»- /(' i^':t/ '"'Sa^^^^SS^^ 1. Philip Parichha, Son of Late Shri Bhima Parichha, aged about 52 years, Presently working as Accountant, District Education lur, Distdct Surguja of Surajpur, ^^s-^ v-^- Resident District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Under Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Difector, PubliC Instructlon, Dlrector^Raipur (C.G.). 4. The Collector, District Surguja Ambikapur (C.G.). 5. The District Education Officer, Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). 6. Shri Vedram Bharadwaj, Accouritant, Block Education Office Malkharouda, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). •3ia NOiiiaiHoyd 'snw.vaNvw 'iyvyoiiyso do ayniVN 3H1 N1 liyM V dO 33NVnsSS'yOd VIQNI dO NOIinj.IlSNOS 3H130Z.ZZ/9ZZ 3~13IiyV VSQNH N011113d TFSTK XI-HC-78- STT^T^Tl^IR? HW3II^T»Hi<t> ~s^ '^ww^, ^ww, Ricii'yy . luP- S.- ^kS^Ob 414^1 g^n^ •"'•'••••••••••••• •'•••^200 3T[^?TTgg? (lkcl'AS"S]iT) gTdiw fffer an^T 30-8-2006 Dor loiter Mr. V.K. Pandey,counsel Mr. Satish Supta, &epu'l No.l to 5, on advonce copy. Hea'd both the counsel. By this writ petition unde^- the petitioner, who is workin9 bistrict Education Office, Sui| transfer order dated 21-8-20016 whereby he has been transfe^ Office, Surflypur to Block Educa^ ©rievanceof the petitio^e wife is o heart patient who i^ Roipur. The concerned doctor petitioner's wife and due to Surcypur is necesscry. Therefore, learned petitioner mcy be allowed to respondent .1 be directed appearing for the Having heard learned and circumstances of the case the case, the prayer made by reasonable. Therefore, the all his niake tt> State/re^>onc|ents coubsel leahned rgwasan+n+inn rni'jing y cbl<f^1<frl RlT-^ft ^ fe^t ^a.ri^iTsn^r the petitioner. y &ovt. Advocate for the State/respondents Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, on the post of Accountott in the Office of •qjpur, &istrict: Surgtya, hos challerged his fi (Annexure P-1) pcesed by respondent No.2, •red from Office of the bistrict Education 1'ion Office, Malkharouda, t>istrict; Jenijgir'. is that he is a handicopped person ond his taking treatment at Escorts Heart Centre, |has found 90% blockage in the he<rt of the reason the presence of the petitioner at this cotiisel for the petitioner submits that the a representotion to respondent No.l and decide the same to which learned counsel No.l to 5 hos no objection. for the porties, having regard to the facts fnd without expressing any opinion on merit of couisel for the petitioner is just, fair and petitioner is allowed to make a detaited evanceSi annexing a copy of this wmt petition annexing P.T.O". 1l"^B-3Esm==s XI-HC-78 T5? •^WM^, SiTfltf'IS, IsfMltiy HIHWI Sh*1|ch ^ 200 sn^Tirag? (yl^q^ff) STI^T^iTR-ii* Hsrrsn^TsbHi^ Soma ?^TTWHf?a'-n^?T -z- and its anhexyres to reqionde(rt r-espondent No.l is directed tj; within a period of 30 days froi|n objections raised by the law. With the direction ofordsaid Consequently, M.(W.)P.N<>.: Parties ore entitled for i< No.l within 10 days from todcy and in turn, j) decide the representation of the petitioner the date of its receipt, after considerirg the petiti^ner in cn objective manner, in accordance with +i.sif<-i'in-< irmat'ffteizttRiwK ^iSTfWTSn^T said, the petition stands disposedof. i.3961/2006 also stonds disposed of. srtrfied copy of this order; Sd/- L.C-Bhadoo P.T.O. '^1 ^^y^LT»"^EU.^5 y-