(1) wp8545-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8545 OF 2011 Kachru Santaramji Khalge PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. D.P. Palodkar, advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. ..... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 16th NOVEMBER, 2011 ORAL ORDER: As to what should be the tender conditions is exclusively within the domain of the Authority. The interference would be warranted only if the condition is found to be palpably arbitrary or totally unreasonable. In any case, two persons have already submitted their bids for sand spots at Shukla Tirth, Nimgaon. In that view of the matter, we find that no case is made out for interference. We are, therefore, not inclined to entertain the present petition. The petition is rejected. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] npj/wp8545-11 (2) wp8545-11