IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16491 of 2010 KHALID KHAN . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 21.5.2010 Petitioner apprehends his arrest in relation to Patna Kotwali P.S.Case no.354/09 registered under Sections 385 and 386/34 IPC. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is alleged that the informant received repeated calls demanding ransom. He received two calls one from mobile and another from basic phone. One of the mobiles is in the name of one Satrughan Bhagsat of village Khaira, District- Chapra. When police interrogated him he admitted that call has been made from his mobile but he named this petitioner and one Munna of making the calls. It is on that basis petitioner is now apprehending his arrest in the present case. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may surrender in the court below within four weeks from today and pray for regular bail, which would be disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. singh ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)