1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.570 OF 2002 [Mr.Vilas Raghunath Khedekar. Vs. Arvind B.Gujbare & State.] ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, office : Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, : appearances, Court’s : orders or directions : and Registrar’s orders : ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.R.D.Suryawanshi, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.R.S.Kate, Adv. for Respondent No.1. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : DATED : DATED : 21st June, 2007. P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant-orig.accused, the learned Advocate for respondent No.1-orig.complainant and the learned APP for the State. Applicant-orig. accused and respondent No.1-orig. complainant are present in Court. 2. By order dated 21st June, 2007 passed in Criminal Application No.170 of 2007 in Criminal Revision Application No.570 of 2002, this Revision Application is restored to 2 file. 3. In the present case the applicant has been convicted under Section 138 of N.I.Act. The parties have stated that they have amicably settled the dispute amongst themselves. The consent terms which have been arrived at by the parties have been tendered. The said consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 4. Revision Application is disposed of in terms of the consent terms and the offence under Section 138 of N.I.Act stands compounded. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]