..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2603 OF 2008 Suresh Waman Kedar. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.Rahul Kate, Adv. for applicant. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP, for State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 6th August, 2008. DATED : 6th August, 2008. DATED : 6th August, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.I-159 of 2007 of Dombivali Police Station. The said case is mainly under Section 302 of IPC. 3. The prosecution case is that the complainant who is a Balwadi teacher sought help of deceased Sandeep to open the lock of the school. Sandeep tried to open the lock, however, he could not succeed hence he went towards his house probably to get a hammer to open the lock. At that time, the applicants questioned Sandeep ..(2).. and both of them assaulted him mercilessly with fist blows and kick blows. The fist blows and kick blows were on the vital part of the body. Nine injuries were found on the body of Sandeep. All of them are contusions. Two contusions were on the left side of the chest. One contusion was found on the scapula. The assault was so merciless that there was fracture of the skull of Sandeep. The statement of the complainant Sunita clearly implicates the applicants. Looking to the statement of the complainant and other eye witnesses and the post-mortem notes, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant bail. Application for bail is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)