1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 4699/2007 Mr. Trimbaksing s/o Nathusingh Shingane Vs. Pandharinath Sansthan @ Vithal Mandir Sansthan Jiwanpura and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE, J. DATED : 06/08/2008. Heard Mr. Dangre, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bapat, learned counsel for respondent no.2. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 16.3.2007 passed by District Judge-1, Achalpur in Misc. Civil Appeal No.32/2006 by which the appeal preferred against the order dated 21.7.2006 passed by Civil Judge, Sr. Dn., Achalpur in Regular Civil Suit No. 61/2006 below Exhibit 5 has been dismissed. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused record, I find that the findings recorded by both the Courts below cannot be termed as perverse warranting interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Mr. Dangre, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that hearing of the suit be expedited. Without ascertaining the exact 2 position of the pendency of matters before the trial Court, I am not inclined to pass any order as sought by Mr. Dangre. However, liberty to the petitioner to file an application for early disposal of the said suit before the trial Court. If such an application is filed, needless to mention that the trial Court shall decide the application on its own merits. Needless to mention that the trial Court shall dispose of the suit uninfluenced by the findings given by both the Courts below in the impugned orders. The petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Ambulkar.