1 MNM IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 9959 OF 2009 Shrinivas Rajayya Gundeti ...Petitioner Vs. Sou. Rajita Shrinivas Gundeti ...Respondent Mr.R.S. Alange, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A.S. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent CORAM : SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 4TH MARCH, 2010 P.C. : 1. The Petitioner husband has challenged the order of interim maintenance granted to the Respondent wife in a sum of Rs.2000/- p.m upon considering the husband’s income. The husband is a qualified M.B.A. He claims to be an educated unemployed, non-working individual. The learned Judge has considered that he is shown as a Director of one Gayatri School of Management. The Petitioner husband as a qualified M.B.A is seen to have been running a School of Management. He is, therefore, a businessman. He has not shown his income. He has contended that he gave up his job at the instance of his wife and has since being unemployed, 2 living with his father. 2. The learned Judge has considered his income under the parameters of the Minimum Wages Act. The learned Judge has been extremely kind and generous to the Petitioner husband. If the husband does not show his income and he is shown to be the Director of an Institute, the income claimed by the wife to be the income of the husband is otherwise accepted. Nevertheless, the learned Judge has not accepted the income of the Petitioner husband as claimed by the wife. He has in fact only considered the most minimum amount that the Petitioner husband in his position would be capable of generating for himself. 3. The Writ Petition is completely misconceived and, therefore, dismissed. (SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.)