bsb IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1797 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1797 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1797 OF 2006 The Employees’ Provident Fund Staff Union & ors. ... Petitioners V/s State of Maharashtra, U.O.I. & anr. ... Respondents Mr. K. Babu Rajan for the petitioners. Mr. P.G. Lad, A.G.P. for the respondent No.1. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: R.M. LODHA & R.M. LODHA & R.M. LODHA & SMT. SMT. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED: DATED: DATED: 9TH JANUARY, 2007. 9TH JANUARY, 2007. 9TH JANUARY, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C.: Mr. P.G. Lad, the Assistant Government Pleader fairly concedes that he is not able to defend the impugned order of the Collector, Mumbai Subarban District in directing the petitioners to discharge the duties mentioned in Exh.B regarding the examination MH-CET 2006. 2. Now, since the impugned order dated 28.4.2006 has been carried out, no order needs to be passed in that 2 regard. However, it is declared that the Collector, Mumbai Subarban District, shall, henceforth not issue any such direction to the petitioners to carry out the duties as was ordered by the order dated 28.4.2006, unless such power is traceable in the law. 3. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. ( R.M. LODHA, J. ) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. )