IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4388 of 2011 Ranjeet Kumar Yadav son of Sri Fudan Yadav Versus The State of Bihar through Vigilance with Cr.Misc. No.4316 of 2011 Sadanand Yadav son of Sri Fudan Lal Yadav Versus The State of Bihar through Vigilance ----------- 12. 23.9.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in Special case No.19 of 2009 arising out of Sikti P.S. case No.165 of 2008 instituted for the offence u/ss.419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13(2), 8/13(i)(e)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The allegation in the First Information Report is that crores of rupees meant for beneficiaries of Indira Awas Yojna was defalcated by Dehti PACS. The further allegation against the petitioners is that the money of Dehti PACS was routed through the Schools and paid to these petitioners even though the amount was meant for beneficiaries of Indira Awas Yojna. It has been submitted that the petitioners had received some cheques from Dehti PACS and explained that in fact the money was in lieu of the supply they had made to certain Schools. However considering that huge amount of money was siphoned off under a well-planned modus in which the - 2 - petitioners also prima facie colluded and poor people were deprived of the benefit of government schemes meant for them, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )