THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU W.P.No.27081 OF 2011 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking to issue writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the sole respondent in interfering with the peaceful possession and constructional activities of the petitioner as arbitrary and illegal and to direct the respondent not to interfere with the peaceful possession and constructional activities of the petitioner. 2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that an extent of 27,227.23 sq.yards of zeroyathi land in Sy.No.39/1A situated at Kurmannapalem, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhaptnam belonging to various land owners had been given to their firm for development and construction of apartments under a development agreement-cum-GPA. The petitioner pursued the matter by approaching various authorities and in this connection, the concerned authorities, after conducting survey, issued a Field Measurement Book plan showing the extent of land pertaining to the petitioner. Thereafter, the plan submitted to the Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation for proposed construction of apartments was also approved on 16.08.2011. So, the petitioner laid foundation and started developmental activities in the land by dumping large material by spending huge amounts. While constructing the boundary wall, the officials of the respondent rushed to the spot of construction twice on 20/22.09.2011, behaved high handedly and warned to stop the construction work. The respondent is also presently holding the incharge of Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation. The officials of the sole respondent are interfering with the construction activities without having any sort of right. Hence, the writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner is making constructions as per the approved plan and therefore, interference by the respondent is illegal and void; and hence, he prays to issue a direction to the respondent not to interfere with the construction activities of the petitioner. 4. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent, on instructions, stated that as on today, the petitioner has been making constructions in terms of the approved plan by the competent authority. 5. Recording the said submission, the respondent is directed not to interfere with the construction activities of the petitioner, if they are making constructions in accordance with the approved plan. However, this order will not preclude the respondent to take appropriate decision in accordance with law if the petitioner makes any illegal constructions or deviating from the sanctioned plan. 6. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 27th October, 2011. AMD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU W.P.No.27081 OF 2011 Date: 27.10.2011 AMD