S. £E'^'.-i'. c r-if^-^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OFLCHiIATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) N0. 3L/gO /2010 PETITIONER ^^<i? ^..-••^•^.- ^^SK^ ^-^wv" y..-^"" .A°^'" tf"RESPONDENTS / Dayalu Ram Sahu, S/o Shri Sriram Sahu, aged about 46 years, R/o Village Joratarai (SE) post Soiloti, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^IIf^'^^®^.^^^':;".^ ;: ..^ ?-.;t. HIQH COURTOF CHHAniSGARH: BILASPUR Sfnote Beneh: Hon'bte Shri Manindra Mohan^lwtosteva^J, PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (Sl N0.348(M2010 Dayalu Ram Sahu Versus State of Chhatti^iarh and others WWT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE Zffi OF THE CONSrTUTION OF iNEgA Present: - Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vinod Tetam, Panel Lawyer for the State. OTSALORDER (Passed on 15th Juiy, 2010) 1. The petitioner was appointed on 11/(^/1982, on probatton on a fixed pay scale of Rs.150/- and subsequently, after completion of his probation, he was granted reguiar pay scale of Rs.545^25/-. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue invoived in the case is as to whether, the petitioner is entiUed to regular ^y seale with effect from the date of initia! appointment or after completion of probaUon period. 3. The issue invoh/ed herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in OA.No.2745/88 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others v. State of M.P. & others), wherein it was heid ttiat the simiiarly situated teachers are entitled to regutar pay scaie with effect from the date of InHial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'bie Supreme Court upholding ttie decision of ^"2X\ ^-^ -^ <l"^s^^i , T"B3i '», '^. .^ ^ T the Tribunal to the effect ttiat the Teachers/Assistant T&achere ars entftfed to reguiar pay scale from the date of initial appointment. ^ - 4. Leamed counsel appearing for the peUthmer further submits that Vtws Court, while considenng the same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu & ofceis v. State Govt. of Chhattisgwh & another, W.P.(S).No.813 of 2007, by order dated ^2/0/2/2007, has grantsd regular pay scale witti effect from the date of inttial appointment. 5. Leamed counsel appearing for the partte jointiy submit Siat the case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Ram Kumar Sahu & Othere v. State Govt. ofChhattisgarh & another (siif»a). 6. In wew of that, this petffion Is allowed on ttie same tsnns, subject to verification ofthe facte. No onter as to coste. .—ssu"a'"" Ossilli