hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5254 OF 2010 Sanjay Ananda Salve ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. S. Rupwate and Mr. Milind INgale and Mr. Santosh J. Parad for Petitioner. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, A.G.P. for R. Nos. 1 to 3 and 5. Mr. K.S. Bapat for R. Nos. 6 and 7. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & MRS MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : JULY 08, 2010 P. C.: Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and Respondents. It is brought to the notice of this court that the Petitioner has already made a representation dated 4.2.2010 regarding non compliance of Rule 45 of the Secondary School Code by the Head of Respondent No. 6 school to the Education Officer. However, till this date, Education Officer has not taken any decision. The learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 has submitted that there is no breach of Rule 45 committed by these respondents. In the circumstances, we direct the Education Officer to decide the said representation pertaining to the grievance of the Petitioner viz a viz. non compliance of rule 45 of the Secondary School Code in accordance with the law and procedure applicable in this regard within the period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order. With these directions, writ petition disposed of by keeping all the contentions raised by the counsel open. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (D.D. SINHA, J.)