Crl. Rev. No. 880/01 (Old No. 822 of 1995) Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. None appear for the revisionist. Heard Sri L.M.Verma learned A.G.A. and perused the impugned judgment and order dated 3.6.1995. The revision was not admitted before the Allahabad High Court. Having gone through the judgment under question with the help of learned A.G.A., I am of the view that the evidence of the prosecution was considered properly by the learned Magistrate. The evidence of the complainant-Badriprasad was not reliable to prove the allegation that the respondent0accused trespassed into his house and criminally intimidated him. Therefore, the judgment of acquittal of the respondent-accused is based on proper appraisal of the evidence. There being no merit in the writ petition, the same cannot legally be admitted. Therefore, the revision is dismissed in limine. (Irshad Hussain, J.) Dated: 02-04-2004 Rawat