(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 199 OF 1992 M/s. Sanghvi Times Industries P. Ltd., F-23/2, MIDC Industrial Area, Chikalthana, Aurangabad. .. Petitioner. versus 1. Association of Engineering Workers, 33, Municipal Shopping Centre, Behind Roxy Cinema, Aurangabad, through Mr. S.J. Chandanshive, Joint Secretary, Aurangabad. 2. The Member, Industrial Court, Osmanpura, Aurangabad. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. S.D. Karkare, Advocate, holding for Mr. P.K. Joshi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. U.S. Sawji, Advocate, holding for Mr. T.K. Prabhakaran, Advocate, for respondent no.1. Respondent no.2 is formal party. ........................ (2) CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 31ST MARCH 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. Adv. Mr. S.D. Karkare, holding for Adv. Mr. P.K. Joshi, for the petitioner, states that despite best efforts, his office could not secure instructions from the petitioner / establishment. 2. Adv. Mr. U.S. Sawji, holding for Adv. Mr. T.K. Prabhakaran, for respondent no.1, invites attention to order dated 21st February 1992 and 7th January 2010, to urge that conditions imposed by this court while granting interim orders and admitting the petition are still not complied with and even affidavit, as directed by this court, is still not filed. 3. Perusal of the order dated 7-1-2010 reveals that four weeks time was given to the petitioner to file appropriate affidavit explaining compliance. That affidavit has not been filed so far. 4. In view of the statement made by Adv. Mr. S.D. Karkare, it is apparent that the petitioner has lost interest in the matter. (3) 5. In this situation, the petition is dismissed with costs of Rs. 5,000/- [Rupees five thousand], payable by the petitioner to respondent no.1. Rule is accordingly discharged. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp199