IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI TUESDAY, THE 31ST AUGUST 2010 / 9TH BHADRA 1932 WA.No. 1412 of 2010 -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.19732/2010 Dated 13/07/2010 .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER: S.DEEPAKUMARI, AGED 32 YEARS D/O.SUKUMARA KURUP, WORKING AS U.P.S.A P.G.M.G.H.S PARAKODE, PATHANAMTHITTA RESIDING AT REMALAYAM, EZHAMKULAM, PARAKODE P.O. PATHANAMTHITTA BY ADV. SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION KERALA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION PATHANAMTHITTA AT THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT PIN 689 645 5. THE HEADMISTRESS, P.G.M.G.H.S. PARAKODE PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT PIN 691 554 6. THE MANAGER, P.G.M.G.H.S. PARAKODE PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT PIN 691 554 7. T.SMITHA RAJAN, UPSA, P.G.M.G.H.S. PARAKODE PO PATHANAMTHITTA PIN 691 554 8. ARYA ARAVIND, W/O.P.VINOD, ANUPAMA AERAM THADICADU PO, ANCHAL, KOLLAM PIN 691 306 GOVT. PLEADER SMT.SMITHA SUKUMARAN THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: A.K.BASHEER & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A.No.1412 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 31st day of August 2010 JUDGMENT Basheer, J. This appeal is directed against an interim order passed by the learned Single Judge in a writ petition which is still pending. 2. We have carefully perused the order impugned. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and respondent No.7 at length. 3. Learned Single Judge has made it clear in the impugned order that appointment of respondent No.7 would be subject to the result of the writ petition which is yet to be heard finally. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having considered the entire materials available on record, we are satisfied that there is no room for interference with the interim order passed by the learned Single Judge. It will be open to the appellant to raise all her contentions before the learned Single Judge in the writ petition which is even now pending. With that liberty reserved in favour of the appellant, writ appeal is dismissed. A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE jes