Civil Revision No. 3226 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3226 of 2011 Date of Decision: 29.7.2011 *** Pritam Singh & Anr. .. Petitioners Vs. Balwant Kaur & Ors. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The present petitioners are the plaintiffs in the suit for declaration and injunction to the effect that they are owners in possession of the suit land and the defendants be restrained from interfering in their possession thereupon. Along with the suit an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC seeking ad-interim injunction for restraining the defendants from raising construction upon the suit land and from changing the nature thereof. However, both the Courts below dismissed their said application, leading to the institution of the present revision petition. Heard. It is apparent from the records that the alleged sale in favour of the plaintiffs was not from specific khasra numbers and no measurement of the land was given in the sale-deed as their alleged land was found comprising in three different khasra numbers. The khasra numbers out of which the defendants allegedly purchased land measuring 2 kanal 15 marlas, the plaintiffs were found having only three marlas of land and it was not shown that vendor of the plaintiffs was in exclusive possession of the suit land. In this view of the matter, finding that the ingredients essential for Civil Revision No. 3226 of 2011 2 grant of ad-interim injunction, are missing, the Courts below rightly declined their prayer. There is no illegality or perversity in the impugned order. The revision petition, being without merit, is accordingly dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE July 29, 2011 Jiten