IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13951 of 2010 VIJAY KUMAR S/O RAMBALAK PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 28.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 304 (B) 302, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. In the First Information report the allegation against in laws of the sister of the informant is that they had demanded dowry and the petitioner being the husband had thrown the deceased in front of the train for reasons of non fulfilment of the same. During investigation the station master and porter disclosed that in fact the deceased had died on account of an accident while crossing the railway line. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Mokama Rail P.S. case no. 10/2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a 2 close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)