1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 7 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 933 OF 1997 WITH SUIT NO.933 OF 1997 Vrajlal T. Gala and ors. ..Plaintiffs. Vs. C.P.Kapadia and ors. ..Defendants. And Mrs.V.J.Kapadia and anr. ..Respondents. Meera A.Kulkarni i/by Purnanand &Co. for the plaintiffs. None for the Defendants. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 15th June, 2010 PC : 1 Heard Advocate for the plaintiff. She states that copy of the chamber summons has been served upon the advocate for the defendants and produces the acknowledgment on her copy. Name of the Advocate for the defendants is shown on the board but the Advocate for the defendants is absent. Chamber summons is for bringing the heirs of the deceased defendant No.2 on record after setting aside the abatement. It appears that the chamber summons has been taken out when the Advocate for the defendants informed about the death of defendant No.2 and the chamber summons is filed thereafter. The contention of the plaintiff is therefore, that there is no delay in filing the chamber 2 summons. In the circumstances, chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). Amendment to be carried out within 4-weeks from today. Chamber summons stands disposed off. SUIT NO.933 OF 1997 1 Advocate for the plaintiff states that pleadings are complete. In the circumstances, both the parties are directed to file their compilation of original documents within four weeks supported by an affidavit in support of the documents. Parties are also directed to submit the draft issues which will be settled on the next date. S.O. for 4-weeks for framing of issues. Copy of the compilation/affidavit to be exchanged before the next date. Suit to be listed after 4 weeks for framing of issues. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)