IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14255 of 2009 MUJIBUL HAQUE, Son of Md. Harun, Resident of Village Jagmalwa, P.S. Thawe, District Gopalganj. ……..Petitioner Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.ISHRAT JAHAN, Wife of Mojibul Haque, Resident of Village Jagmalwa, P.S. Thawe, District Gopalganj, Presently resides in village Mirallipur, P.S. Thawe, District Gopalganj, Now, Wife of Bhikar Mian, Son of Taslim Mian, Village Dharamparsa, P.S. Manjha, District Gopalganj. ……..Opposite Parties 02/- 12-10-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to insert the name of husband and present address of complainant- informant during course of the day. This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of order dated 07-11- 2003 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 237 of 2001 for the offences under Sections 498(A), 406, 307 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after cognizance taken in the case the same has been committed to the Court of Session, matter is pending there bearing Sessions Trial No. 318 of 2006. It is further pointed out that the petitioner being original husband of the complainant-informant was made accused 2 in this case, but the parties have already settled their dispute amicably. In pursuance thereof the complainant-informant has already performed the second marriage and is blessed with children from him. On basis of compromise, petitioner was granted privilege of bail by the Court, who during pendency of bail application got examined complainant-informant on such issue. In view of the facts and circumstances stated above, petitioner is granted liberty to agitate all his points before the trial court at appropriate stage preferably at the time of hearing on the point of charge, if trial is yet to be commenced. Simultaneously, petitioner is further granted liberty to request the trial court to expedite hearing, if trial has commenced and ensure appearance of complainant-informant as witness, so that truth may come into light and appropriate order may be passed at the earliest. After exhausting due processes securing appearance of complainant- informant, the trial court may also pass appropriate order in accordance with law. With the above liberty this application stands disposed of at the admission stage itself. Praveen (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)