1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.339 OF 2009 Jaya Bhojwani. ..Petitioner. Vs. Sanjay Bhojwani and anr. ..Respondents. Advocate Mr. A. Jayakar along with Ashwin Jhete i/by M/s. Khaitan Jayakar Sud and Vohra. Mr.Sanjay Bhojwani present in person. Mrs.Vandana Jaisingh for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 14th Sept.2009. PC: 1 This is a contempt petition filed by the petitioner-wife alleging a breach of the order dated 31.5.2008 passed by the Family Court at Pune. By the said order, the consent terms filed and executed between the parties and which were marked at Exhibit-20 in the record of the family court were accepted and made part and parcel of the decree. Under the consent terms, certain 2 unspecified articles belonging to the petitioner wife were returnable to the husband. These articles were lying in premises which were attached by the respondent No.2 bank. Now, in the contempt petition, it is alleged by the petitioner wife that several articles as specified in Para-12 of the petition read with an inventory prepared under the order of the Supreme Court were not returned by the husband. The record indicates that so far as husband is concerned, by an order dated 31.10.2007 passed by the DRT, he was allowed to take out articles belonging to him. The record further indicate that the father of the respondent No.1 on behalf of himself and certain other co- owners has given receipt indicating that movables have been taken by him except movables belonging to the husband-respondent No.1. In so far as movables of husband are concerned, the father of respondent No.1 had stated that other co-owners had permitted Indusind Bank to deliver the same to the respondent No.1. The stand of the respondent No.1 is that 3 from whatever he has received, the articles belonging to his wife were delivered to her family members. In my view, there is serious doubt as to what exactly are the belongings of the petitioner. These are matters which can be decided in execution proceedings. With liberty to file execution proceeding, this petition is rejected. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)