IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 4621 of 2003 Between: 1 K.Gouramma W/o.K.Hanumanthappa H.NO.46-1-B, A Camp, Kurnool 2 K.Lakshmamma W/o.late K.Venkataswamy H.NO.46-1-B, A Camp, Kurnool 3 K.Narsing Rao S/o.K.Ramanna H.NO.46-1-B, A Camp, Kurnool .....PETITIONERS AND The Municipal Commissioner Kurnool Municipality Narsingraopeta, Kurnool, Kurnool District ....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in taking steps to construct the drainage canal in the plots belonging to the petitioners in Sy.No.900-A of Kallur Mandal under the Kurnool Municipality without any prior notice as illegal and against the principles of natural justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.JAWAHAR (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent: MR.A.SREEDHAR The Court made the following : ORDER: When the matter came up before this Court on 20.07.2004, the learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. There is no representation. Hence, the matter is directed to be posted today i.e. 23.07.2004 under the Caption ‘For Dismissal’. Today, when the case is called, the learned counsel for the petitioners is absent, though the case is listed under the Caption ‘For Dismissal’. There is no representation. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed for default/non-prosecution. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO,J) 23.07.2004 pln ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Municipal Commissioner, Kurnool Municipality, Narsingraopet, Kurnool. 2. 2 CD copies. Form-NIC-OGS/WP{ }