WPMS 375/2009 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Sri R.C. Upadhyay, Advocate holding the brief of Sri R.V.S. Khokhar, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that he does not wish to press the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sri M.S. Tyagi, the learned counsel for the respondent nos. 8, 9, 10 and 12 has filed an application for being transposed as petitioners since their interest with the main petitioners is the same, and that they would be adversely affected if the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Since the writ petition has been dismissed as not pressed, it would be open to the respondent nos. 8, 9, 10 and 12 to file separate writ petition, if they are so advised. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 25-10-2010 SP