•i (^ c l^r.:- ^t>' IN THE HJGH CO(?RT OF JUDICATURE AT JABM*PUR WRIT PETITION N0, ^}^ GF 1997 - PETITIONER S Marati sharan Mehar' son of shri IoC» Mehar aged abou.te 49 y^ars^ • resldenfe ©f Birpara^ near Turing Talkies^ TaIi@ilwSaraaggarh Di©trict-RaigadIie(M<P«) V_E R S__U_S KESPGNDEMTS !• The Stafce o£ Madhya Prad@@h tlirough the Secrefeary^ Deparbment ©fLaw<( Satpufl& Bhawan^Bhopal (M.P<.)' l\2^ The Regisfcrary General^ M<P,High Courfe, jabalpur. 3« ShsS. J.K.S«.Rajpu.b, Diafcrict ^and stfrs©ionsJxadg® Sarguja^J bikapur o 4e Shri L<sD«T©nde^ ag@d aboufe.55 year@^ p£,esently working a® Msfcriete Nazir (U«Q«C,) Disfertet Court sarguja, i bikapur» 5« Shri K.P.Pandeytf age<3 abput 52 years presenfcly worklng as U^D^C^ District'Court-SargyjayARibilcapuz. 6« shri Vashisht®Mishr&» aged about 58 years preseafcly working as U.D.c.Disfcrict Court Distriet-sarguja^Anbjllcapur* WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTIGLE 226/227 GF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA^ HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 690 of 1997 Petitioner Maniti Sharan. Mohar Versus Respondents The State of Madhya Pradesh & ofhers Sin^le Beach : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. None for fhe petLtioner. None for fhe rcspondents. ORAL ORDER (218tApril,2006) The foUowmg oi-der of the Court was passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. The matter is called for hearmg twice. On bofh the occasions, none appears nor any reprcsentation is made on behalfoffhe petitioner. 2. In view of the above, fhe petition staads dismissed for waat of proseciition. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Bablu