IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.14185/2008 Decided on:17.6.2011 _____________________________________________ Harish Kumar. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. L.N. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for respondents No.1 to 4. None for respondent No.5. Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Advocate for respondent No.6. _____________________________________________________ Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No.6 to the post of Primary Assistant Teacher in Government Primary School, Tarol, Tehsil and District Solan. The last date of receipt of application was 6.10.2006. Petitioner and respondent No.6 were interviewed for the post in question on 12.10.2006 by a duly constituted Selection Committee. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 Selection Committee recommended the name of respondent No.6 to the post of Primary Assistant Teacher in Government Primary School, Tarol. Petitioner has secured 34.38 marks and respondent No.6 has secured 44.70 marks, as per the reply filed by respondents No. 1 to 4. Since the suitability of the petitioner and respondent No.6 has been adjudged by a duly constituted Selection Committee, this Court will not substitute its own wisdom. There are no mala fides alleged against the members of the Selection Committee. 2. Accordingly, in view of the observations and discussions made hereinabove, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 17.6.2011 *awasthi*