IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23849 of 2009 DEEPAK MAHTO, S/o Sri Dashrath Mahto. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05. 30.11.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the bail application. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 324 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the submission that there is no injury report on record, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 04.05.2009 and has no criminal antecedent be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-XIII, Patna in connection with Malsalami P.S. Case No. 141 of 2008 (S.Tr. No. 1099 of 2009) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That - 2 - one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The petitioner will not default on two dates fixed for framing of charge and in case he does so his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)