IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. ‘70 8 /2004 .~ \N PETITIONER /\© - ®0§ S/o :C. R. Heeralal Tandya Tandya 3M QIJM £09% W N £ Town Inspector, Masturi, ' Tehsil— Masturi Dist— Bilaspur (C.G) Versus 1. State of Chhatisgarh Through Chief Secretary Home Department, D.K.Bhawan Raipur (CG) 2. W Director General of Police, Secretariat Home Department D.K.Bhawan Raipur (C.G) ’ P‘W @rl Anll Nawan‘) WM Police Bilaspur (C‘G) @dvk 4. hri M L Shandil apDggI ‘\ (awe Vev HW’ k District Superintendent of Police A)” f DSP HQ ornce 6% M Bilaspur (C.G) 2s (l6 w/Vw WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227VOF THE CONSTITUTION OF$§LC3 INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT ORDER OF DIRECTION TO ‘ ‘ DO JUSTICE IN THF MATTPR ‘u/l '1 4 ' M H§GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR \q/l WRET PETI‘HON NO. N8 OF 2Q04 Peiiticner r CR. Tandya Versus Resgondents ' State af Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA {SB : Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agmhoiri, J.) Present :— Shri H.3Ahluwaiia, Advocate forvthe petitioner. Sh¥i P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe State. GRDER (ORAL; (Passed on wt“ day {if January, 201 1) 1. Learned counsel apgearing for the petitioner submits that though the petition wae fiied after the order in appeei was passed, however, the said order couid not be oheiienged. Thus, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with iiberty to chaiienge the finai order in the ease Le. order passed in appeai. Learned counsei appearing for other side has no objection. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with iiberty to fiie a fresh petition; if so advised, as afore-stated i Sd/- i Satish K. Agnihoui Judge § _ , i , moi ,,i