1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Criminal Writ Petition No.439 of 2006. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, office Memoranda of Coram Court's or Judge's appearances, Court's orders or directions order and Registrar's order. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. A. Agrawal, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. D.B. Patel,, A.P.P.for the State. CORAM: K.J.ROHEE & C.L.PANGARKAR,JJ. DATED : November 28, 2006. 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. From the reply filed on behalf of respondent no.2, it seems that Crime No. 189/20006 under Sections 279/337 of I.P.C. was registered at P.S. Chandur Bazar on the basis of information that one Manikrao Janrao Aware who was riding a motor-cycle was hit by truck and was injured. Subsequently the injured viz. Manikrao Janrao Aware succumbed to the injuries and offence under Section 304-A of I.P.C. was added. It seems that the charge sheet is yet to be filed. 3. The petitioner is the driver of the offending truck. According to the petitioner he had informed the Police the names of some eye witnesses. However, their statements were not recorded by the Police 2 during investigation. It is apparent that if the Police have not recorded the statements of the witnesses suggested by the petitioner, the petitioner may examine them as defence witnesses in case charge sheet is filed against him. Thus there is no merit in the present petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed in limine. JUDGE JUDGE halwai.