IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 1205 of 1999 to CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 1208 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA ============================================================== ============================================================== JAYANTIJI KHODAJI THAKORE &10 - Applicant(s) Versus CHAMPALAL GOPIRAM AGRAWAL &10 - Opponent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : MR DIPAK R DAVEfor Petitioner No(s).: 1,2, 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10. MR AJ PATEL for Respondent No(s).: 1,2, 5,6. 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? RULE SERVED for Respondent No(s).: 3,9. UNSERVED-EXPIRED (R) for Respondent No(s).: 4,10,11. RULE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent No(s).: 7,8. =========================================================== CORAM :HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA Date : 12/07/2005 COMMON ORAL JUDGMENT Mr. Dipak R. Dave, learned advocate of the petitioners seek leave to withdraw the petitions in view of the amendment made under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure with a view to file petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Mr. A.J.Patel, learned advocate for the Respondents has no objection is leave as prayed for is granted. Hence, leave to withdraw the petitions is granted. Petitions stand disposed of as they are withdrawn with no order as to costs. Rule is made absolute in each of the petitions. (A.M.Kapadia,J) Jayanti*