IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24112 of 2010 SUBOD MANDAL @ SUBODH MANDAL & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being neighbours of the informant are apprehending their arrest in connection with Kahalgaon P.S. Case No. 58 of 2010 in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 325, 354/34, 324 of the I.P.C. and Section 3(i)(x) of the S.C./S.T.(Prevention of Atrocities)Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that there was only petty scuffle in which simple injuries were caused. However, the allegation of teasing the informant’s grand-daughter is against Janardan Mandal who has been granted bail by the learned court below. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioners is rejected. However, I see no reason the learned court below will give a different treatment to 2 the petitioners in view of the fact that other accused Janardan Mandal has been granted bail. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioners in view of the aforesaid observation and preferably dispose of regular bail application on the same day. Let the order be transmitted through fax at the cost of the petitioners. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)