1 C.A. No. 1933 of 2010 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATRE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1933 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 13011 OF 2010 Dagadu Krishna Mane and anr. ... Applicants Versus Mahananda Vithal Sapate and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Anand Kulkarni, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. Surel S. Shah for respondent no. 4. Mr. Sandeep S. Jinsiwale for respondent no. 5. CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J. DATED : APRIL 28, 2011 P.C. This application is for condonation of delay of 610 days in preferring the First appeal. It appears that soon after the dismissal of the claim petition, the appellant had approached this court with the appeal proceedings. However, the appeal could not be filed since there was an error in the main order. The appellant therefore, had to approach the Tribunal for correction of the order. That correction was carried out only on 13th August, 2009. Considering the facts of the case, in my opinion, the applicant has made out sufficient case for 2 C.A. No. 1933 of 2010 condonation of delay. Hence, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to number the appeal and place the same for admission in due course. [Judge]