Civil Contempt Petition No. 400 of 2005 Hon. P.C. Pant, J. Heard. There is no direction in the order dated 19.11.2005 against the respondent to regularise the services of the petitioners. Rather, only it is provided that the petitioners may approach the competent authority for their regularisation, as the Scheme has been formulated in this regard. Since, there is no direction to regularise the services of the petitioners in the impugned order, it cannot be said that there is wilful disobedience on the part of the respondents of any direction contained in the order dated 19.11.2005, passed in writ petition No. 40 (S/S) of 2004. The petitioners are at liberty to seek their remedy available if their regularisation is rejected by the respondents. With this observation, the contempt petition is dismissed. (P.C. Pant, J.) Dt. 16.02.2006 HN