IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2009 / 31ST ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 16085 of 2004(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. C.S. RICE MILL, 11/107, MANNATHUKAVU, THANISSERRY, PALAKKAD-678 501, REPRESENTED BY C.S. SITARAM, MANAGING PARTNER. 2. SRI. C.S. SITARAM, MANAGING PARTNER 11/107, MANNATHUKAVU, THANISSERRY PALAKKAD-678 501. 3. C.S. PRIYANAND, PARTNER, C.S. RICE MILL, 11/107, MANNATHUKAVU, THANISSERRY, PALAKKAD-678 501. BY ADV. SMT.SALLY THOMAS CHACKO SRI.P.T.THOMAS SMT.SARAH SALVY SMT.A.B.MANJU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. CHIEF MANAGER, KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, MATHA KOVIL STREET, SULTHANPET, PALAKKAD. 3. DISTRICT MANAGER, KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, PALAKKAD BRANCH, PALAKKAD. ADDL. RESPONDENTS: 4. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR(RR), KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, K.M.M.COMPLEX, THRISSUR. (ADDL. R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DT.1.8.2006 IN I.A. NO.10459/2006.) ADV. SRI.T.V.GEORGE, SC, KFC FOR R1&2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: TRUE COPY OF LETTER ISSUED BY R2 DT.6.10.2003. P2: TRUE COPY OF REPORT ISSUED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGY DT.31.7.2003. P3: TRUE COPIES OF DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY R3 ON 22.12.2003. P4: .DO. .DO. P5: TRUE COPY OF LETTER ISSUED BY R2 DT.13.2.2004. P6: TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DT.12.3.04 IN WP(C) NO.8445/04. P7: TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT ISSUED BY R1 DT.29.3.04. P8: TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BEFORE R1 DT.31.3.04. P9: TRUE COPY OF LETTER DT.11.5.2004 ISSUED BY R1. P10: PHOTOCOPY OF DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY THE DY. TAHSILDAR(RR) DT.4.4.2006. P11: PHOTOCOPY OF REQUEST LETTER GIVEN BY 2ND PETITIONER TO THE DY. TAHSILDAR9RR) DT.15.5.2006. TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... W.P.(C) No.16085 of 2004 .................................................................... Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT This court vide interim order dated 3.1.2007 directed the petitioner to deposit Rs.92,800/- and apply for OTS benefit because the Corporation had agreed to grant OTS benefit to the petitioners on payment of an advance amount along with application for settlement. It is not known whether petitioner has filed application or the matter is settled. If the petitioners have not settled the matter, the Corporation is free to recover the arrears. W.P.(C) is closed with the above observation. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms