:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5184 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO.5184 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO.5184 OF 2004 Mr Ananda Pandurang Pachupate & Anr Petitioners vs Smt Sonabai Shivram Pachupate, .. Respondent Mr Dilip Bodake, for the petitioners. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : MAY 02, 2005. DATE : MAY 02, 2005. DATE : MAY 02, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. This petition is directed against the order passed by the revenue authorities in the RTS proceedings initiated at the instance of the respondent-widow. Mr Bodake, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the revenue authorities, while passing the impugned order, did not take into consideration the rights determined by the civil Court vide its judgment dated 30.3.94 in Regular Civil Suit No.18 of 1990 filed by the respondents. If that be so, it is always open for the parties to approach the revenue authorities to get the revenue entries rectified on the basis of the rights determined by the civil Court. Keeping that option open to the petitioners, this petition is dismissed. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) :2: :2: :2: /rrt/db-05/b-2505/wp5184-04