IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 25694 of 2008 BETWEEN : 1 Dendukuri Jayasri, w/o. Late D. Krishna Prasad, R/o. D.No. 20-3/1-9A, 4th Lane, New Ayodya Nagar, Vijayawada Krishna District, and Legal Hairs of Late D. Krishna Prasad 2 Dendukuri Srinivasa Siva Naga Krishna Syam, S/o. Late D. Krishna Prasad, R/o. D.No. 20-3/1-9A, 4th Lane, New Ayodya Nagar, Vijayawada Krishna District, and Legal Hairs of Late D. Krishna Prasad 3 Dendukuri Phanindra Kumar, S/o. Lae D. Krishna Prasad, R/o. D.No. 20-3/1-9A, 4th Lane, New Ayodya Nagar, Vijayawada Krishna District, and Legal Hairs of Late D. Krishna Prasad ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Collector, Guntur District. 2 Debt Recovery Tribunal, Hyderabad Rep by the Presiding Officer 3 Andhra Bank, Balanagar Branch, Hyderabad Rep by Chief Manager 4 Dendukuri Visweswara Sharma, S/o.Late D. Hanumath Rao, of M/s. Techno Dyanamics, R/o. D.No. 12-11-1327, Boudha Nagar, Warsiguda, Secunderabad - 500 061. 5 Dendukuri Subramanyam, S/o.Late D. Hanumath Rao, R/o. D.No. 5-44-19; 4/9th Road, Block No. 4, New Ward No. 3 Raghava Nilayam, Broadipet, Guntur. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly a writ of mandamus declaring the actions of the respondent No. 1, 2 & 3 in proceedings against the share of the property held by the petitioners as illegal and arbitrary and it further consequently prayed that this Hon'ble Court to set-aside the order of the Respondent No. 1 vide No. D.Dis.No. 2804/07-D1, dated 12-2-2008. Counsel for the Petitioners : MSP.S.BHRAMARAMBA DEVI Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER : (Per Hon’ble Sri Anil R.Dave, CJ) Learned advocate for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition, so as to enable the petitioners to approach the concerned authority for ventilating their grievances. Permission granted and the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. _________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 26th November 2008 ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J ajr