IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 5029 of 2010 Decided on 20.8.2010 Suresh Kumar Garla Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the Petitioner : S/Sh. Rajesh Kumar and Rajinder Thakur, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- (i) That the order of posting of the private respondent against the petitioner and termination of the petitioner may kindly be quashed with consequential benefits while issuing the writ of certiorari. (ii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to release the salary of the petitioner which has not been given to the petitioner after the sanctioning of the Grant in Aid to the petitioner and also to work and the benefits consequential may kindly be granted from the date of termination. (iii) That the petitioner may kindly be allowed to work as PTA teacher with all consequential benefits from the date of illegal termination as per grant in aid rules while issuing the writ in the nature of mandamus and further the respondents may kindly be directed to release the Grant in aid to the petitioner or any other order which may deem fit be passed in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned Senior Additional Advocate General submits that only a regular teacher has been appointed in the post occupied by the petitioner and by the very fact that the petitioner is a PTA teacher, the petitioner has to give room for a regular teacher since the PTA is only an adhoc arrangement made by the Parent Teacher Association. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that there are several vacancies available to accommodate the regular teacher and the fourth respondent need not be appointed in place of the petitioner and in case the fourth respondent is accommodated, the petitioner will have to go out and there is no other place where he can be accommodated since he is only PTA teacher. 4. It is certainly open to the petitioner to point out this aspect before the second respondent, in which case the second respondent will consider whether the fourth respondent can be accommodated at any other suitable place so that the petitioner can continue. Necessary orders in that regard shall be passed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the representation along with a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. ( Justice Kurian Joseph ), Chief Justice August 20, 2010(K/HL) ( Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge