IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 27TH AUGUST 2009 / 5TH BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 24854 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- KALATMAK RESIDENCY RESIDENTS ASSN., (A REGISTERED SOCIETY UNDER REGISTRATION NO. ER-674/08) HAVING OFFICE AT 102, KALATMAK RESIDENCY, VIDYANAGAR, COCHIN-20, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT, SRI.SUDHEER PATEL. BY ADV. SRI.GOVIND K.BHARATHAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.N.RATHEESH SMT.SUMA RATHEESH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE TALUK SURVEYOR, VILLAGE OFFICE, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS, REHABILITATION BLOCK,TRIDA BUILDING, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF COCHIN, ERNAKULAM. 4. THE SENIOR TOWN PLANNER, REGIONAL TOWN PLANNING OFFICE, GCDA, ERNAKULAM. 5. THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, CORPORATION OF COCHIN. R1 AND R2 BY GP I V PRAMOD R4 BY V K MOHAMMED YOUSEFF R3 AND R4 BY S RAMESH BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO. 24854 OF 2009 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2009 JUDGMENT Government Pleader takes notice for R1 and R2. Adv.S Ramesh Babu takes notice for R3, R4 and R5. 2. The petitioner is a residents' association, objecting to a newly coming up structure. The proposal to build that structure is challenged before the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions. The main issue appears to be the approved plan etc. The petitioner's efforts to get those documents under the RTA Act, is stated to be not fruitful. Whatever that be, Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions has to ensure that the entire files are available before it to decide on the matter. Hence it is ordered that any request of the petitioner to the Tribunal to summon the document will be considered with top priority and the matter will be disposed of, taking into consideration all the relevant matters and untrammelled by anything stated in this judgment. Obviously, the learned Tribunal would not dispose of the appeal without obtaining on record, the plan as aforesaid. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE lgk/28/8