V IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP. No. WKW’ /2003 SUMENDRA RAM KURREY, S/o Shri 6L; WQmey aged baout 30 years, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat NipanL Tahsil Balod, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Petitioner VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through : Principal Secretary Panchayat & Welfare Department Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) Gram Panchayat Nipani Through Chief Executive Officer Gram Panchayat Nipani, Tahsil Balod, Distt. Durg (CG) The Additionar Corrector, L; Durg (Chhattisgarh) r; 1 The Sub Divisional Officer, V (Revenue), Balod, S Tah. Balod, Distt. Durg (C.G.‘a) Respondents Shri T. R. Maheshwari Nayab Tahsildar, Balod, Tahsil Balod, Distt. Durg (C,G.) Slate Of l E‘;A5PUR t Ul i / ¢ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 2X26/227;GF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA“. ‘ jx WWfifgétm A %awma1%s1 SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Nioh an Shrivastava J. 1?:93-2011 Shri V.G. Tamaskar, counsei for the petitioners. and 4. $hri Suryakant Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the Stateirespondents 1, 3 Shri Subhash Yadav, couns el for the respondent No.2. Learned counsel for the partieS‘jointty submit that during the pendency of the petition, the tenure of the etitioner has already come to an end and even the disqualification specified in the impugned order has aiso come to an end. Learned counsel for the etitioner raised an apprehension that the respondents may take action to ards recovery, in view of the impugned order. However, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that in the order impugned, there is no or er of any kind of recovery against the petitioner. record. The submission of learned counsei for the respondents is piaced on Therefore, the petition is r ndered infructuous and is finally disposed i rs off. r tees ‘ V7, Deepti /’ \ _ Sd/— l ‘ , Manindra Mohan Shrivastava v . 4 ‘. Judge ii, / r