IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.706 of 2006 RAJ KUMARI DEVI Versus BIPAT SAH @ DEOKI SAH ----------- 3 21/8/2008 This case has been listed at the instance of counsel for the petitioner. Due to mistake of stenographer the orders passed separately in two cases, namely, C.R. No. 706 of 2006 (Raj Kumari Devi Vs. Bipat Sah @ Deoki Sah) and C.R. No. 707 of 2006 (Ram Narayan Sahni Vs. Bachhi Devi), which were heard and disposed of on the same date i.e, 16.7.2008, unfortunately got mixed in course of typing out the order, in as much as, the order passed in C.R. No. 706 of 2006 was typed in C.R. No. 707 of 2006 and vice-versa. This being purely typographical error on the part of the stenographer, this Court would direct to correct the error by treating the following order passed in C.R. No. 706 of 2006:- “Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. Thakur, fairly submits that the remedy of the petitioner was before the Court which has passed the decree not before the Executing Court and consequently he would seek permission to withdraw this application with liberty to move the appropriate Court. This Court without expressing any opinion on such submission of the counsel for the petitioner, would accord permission to the petitioner to withdraw this application. 2 Accordingly, this Civil Revision application is dismissed as withdrawn.” (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar