IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.421 of 2011 Ghanshyam Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar &Others ----------- 02. 19.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is against alleged highhandedness of the respondents no. 8 to 10 who forcefully entered into the house of the petitioner and attacked, as a result, petitioner had no other option except to lodge a complaint case bearing Complaint Case no. 393C/2011 since the police official is not taking appropriate action against the aforesaid respondents. It is submitted that the aforesaid complaint case is pending in the court of C.J.M., Begusarai for enquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that notwithstanding the pendency of the aforesaid complaint case, these respondents though basically stops the petitioner for entering into the house/his land for which petitioner has also given an information to the concerned S.D.M for taking appropriate action in which notices have been issued but no final decision has been taken as yet. Learned Advocate General appearing for the State submits that the recourse available to the petitioner, is to 2 agitate the matter in the court below but not through this writ application. Considering the rival submissions of the parties and on perusal of the averments made in the writ application as also paragraph -33 of the writ application, I am not inclined to interfere into the matter. Accordingly, this writ application stands disposed of. However, it will be open for the petitioner to pursue his remedy before the authority concerned as also in the court below. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)