IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 17856 of 2004 Between: A.V.R.Thrimurthulu, s/o late Venkata Ramana Murthy, D.No.2-77, Vakatippa, U.Kothapalli Mandal, E.G.District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh rep., by its Secretary, Information Technology & Communications Dept., Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The District Level RSDP Steering Committee, East Godavari at Pragathi Bhavan, Kakinada, rep., by its Chairman-cum-District Collector. 3 The District Level R.S.D.P.Steering Committee, East Godavari District, Kakinada, rep., by its Member- Convenor-cum-Executive Director, E.G.District, SC CS Ltd., Pragathi Bhavan, Kakinada. 4 The Superintending Engineer, APEPDCLtd., Rajahmundry, E.G.District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the letter issued by the 2nd respondent in Lr.Rc.No.S10/1413/2003, dated 02-07-2004 as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents to accord permission to the petitioner to collect electricity bills and other services through his R.S.D.point without insisting upon him to enroll himself in the Common Interest Group. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR. N.SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : MR. O.MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.17856 OF 2004 ORDER : It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and therefore no further adjudication is necessary. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 04.12.2008 gbs