$-24-33, 35-39, 67-71 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LA.APP.24/2009 RAJ SINGH & ORS. Through: Appellant UOI & ANR. Through: versus Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. LA.APP.25/2009 CHOTU & ANR. Through: Appellants UOI & ANR. Through: LA.APP.34/2009 SHRI BRAHMA Through: versus Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. Appellant versus UOI & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. Page 1 of 8 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified LA.APP.36/2009 RISHI RAJ RANA& ANR. Through: Appellants UOI & ANR. versus Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. LA.APP.47/2009 M.P.GUPTA Through: Appellant versus UOI & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. LA.APP.48/2009 RAGHUBIR SINGH Through: Appellant UOI & ANR. versus Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. LA.APP.55/2009 BHULLAN @ BHULE & ANR. Through: Appellants Page 2 of 8 versus K' UOI & ANR. Through: Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. LA.APP.56/2009 M.P.GUPTA & SONS Through: .Appellants Versus UOI & ORS. Through: Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Rannesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. + LA.APP.57/2009 MEHAR SINGH & ORS. Through: .Appellants Versus UOI & ORS. Through: Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. LA.APP.58/2009 SANJEEV TUSHIR Through: .Appellants Page 3 of 8 s Versus UOI & ORS. Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. + LA.APP.127/2009 JAI NARAYAN & ORS Through: .Appellants Versus UOI & ANR. Through: Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. LA.APP.85/2009 LAKH I RAM Through: .Appellant Versus UOI & ANR. Through: + LA.APP.78/2009 GURDEV SINGH Through: Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. .Appellant Page 4 of 8 Versus UOI & ORS. Through: Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. LA.APP.77/2009 RAJ SINGH (D) THRU LRS Through: .Appellants Versus UOI & ORS. Through: Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. + LA.APP.76/2009 NISHA GUPTA Through: .Appellant Versus UOI & ORS. Through: Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. LA.APP.340/2010 RATTAN SINGH Through: Appellant Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate. Page 5 of 8 versus UOI & ORS. Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.indrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. LA.APP.341/2010 CHARAN SINGH & ORS. Appellants Through: Mr.Kuldeep Baihara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate. UOI & ORS. versus Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.indrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. LA.APP.342/2010 RAGHUBIR SINGH Through: Appellant Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate. UOI Si ORS. Through: LA.APP.343/2010 ANGOORI Si ORS. Through: versus Respondents Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.indrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. Appellants Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate. Page 6 of 8 versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for PDA. + LA.APP.344/2010 HEM CHANDERSHARMA DECD. THR LRs Appellant Through: Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate. versus UOI Si ORS. Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ramesh Ray, Advocate and Mr.Ashish Tanwar, Advocate for UOI. Ms.lndrani Ghosh and Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for PDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG ORDER % 02.06.2011 1. The instant appeals pertain to lands situated in the revenue estate of village Ghevra, and the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 with which 1 am concerned was issued on 6.2.2003. 2. The Reference Court has assessed the compensation @ ?1,18,367/- besides other statutory benefits as per the Land Acquisition Act 1894. 3. Deciding a batch of appeals lead matter being LA.APP Page 7 of 8 No.489/2008 Chiranii La! Vs. UP! & Anr. today itself, with reference to a decision dated 19.12.2008 passed by a Division Bench deciding LA.APP.No.193/2006 Pratao Singh (through LRs) Vs. UO! & Ors. I have determined the fair market value of the lands in village Ghevra at ^4,03,425/- per bigha as of 6.2.2003. 4. The appeals stand disposed of decreeing the same enhancing the compensation payable to the appellants @^4,03,425/- per bigha; additionally decreed that the appellants would be entitled to the statutory benefits as per the Land Acquisition Act 1894 including the decision of the Supreme Court reported as 93 (2001) DLT 569 Sunder Vs. Union of India. 5. The appellants would also be entitled to proportionate costs. 6. Pending applications, if any, in the appeals stand disposed of in terms of the prayer made in the application. ^■^*1 PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. June 2, 2011 dk Page 8 of 8