CWP No.15180 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.15180 of 2009 Date of decision: 25-09-2009 Bal Vikas Senior Secondary School, Bahadurgarh and another ....Petitioners VERSUS The Lokayukta, Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH Present: Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. JASBIR SINGH, J. (Oral) This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to quash Order dated 08.09.2009 (Annexure P-7) passed by respondent no.1. It is contention of counsel for the petitioners that without complying with the provisions of Section 8(2) of the Haryana Lokayukta Act, 2002, enquiry has been ordered against the petitioners. Reading of Order (Annexure P-7) indicates that on a complaint made to the Lokayukta, Haryana – respondent no.1, an enquiry is going on, regarding grant of NOC to some educational institutions. At the time of argument before the respondent no.1, it transpires that regarding eight schools, the Enquiry Officer has not given any finding. Taking note of the same, the following observation CWP No.15180 of 2009 -2- was made in the order mentioned above:- "Ms Lather has also pointed out that she had confined her enquiry to the allegations made against Mr Dhankar and Mr Satdev and, therefore, she had not gone into the question as to whether the NOC/recognition to the other schools referred to in the letter had been property given or not. She has undertaken to examine this matter and submit her further report within one month. She has been asked to give adequate opportunity of hearing to the complainant who shall attend her office as and when required." Above said observation is being treated by the petitioners as an order of enquiry against them. The impression gathered by the petitioners is absolutely not correct. The Enquiry Officer has been asked to look into the circumstances under which NOC/recognition was granted to the eight schools including a school run by the petitioners, that do not amount to institutions of an enquiry against the petitioners. No case is made out for interference. Dismissed. (JASBIR SINGH) 25-09-2009 JUDGE manju