IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36984 of 2010 VIJAY PRAJAPATI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 07.10.2010. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner, Vijay Prajapati, is in custody since 17.07.2010 in connection with Sasaram (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.395 of 2010 instituted under Sections 385, 506, 387 and 120 (B) of I.P.C. According to F.I.R., the informant gave a written report alleging that from mobile No.9771284017 and another mobile number in F.I.R. were threatening the informant and his father- in-law to withdraw the case instituted by father-in-law. It is further alleged that sometimes this petitioner, Vijay Prajapati, was also threatening. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is in custody since 17.07.2010 and there is no evidence and moreover except threatening, no further allegation has been made by the informant and, therefore, Section 387 is not applicable. On the other hand, the learned A.P.P. objected the prayer for bail. Considering the nature of allegation and period of detention, I direct that the petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rs.Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sssaram (Mufassil) P.S. Case No.395 of 2010. Sanjeev/- ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.) 2