BA-756-11.sxw 1 Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.756 OF 2011 [For Cancellation of Bail] The State of Maharashtra, Thru' Matunga Police Station, Mumbai ... Applicant V/s. Yasir Nasir Qureshi & Anr. ... Respondents Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP, for the Applicant. Mr. Kamlesh Tripathi for the Respondents. CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 28 TH JULY, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. The Respondent No.1 is said to be a 'juvenile'. I am informed that the case against him ended in acquittal. This application for cancellation of bail indicates that the same is also for cancellation of bail granted to the Respondent No.2 i.e. the mother of Respondent No.1. 3. Mr. Tripathi, the learned Advocate for the Respondents says that the mother of Respondent No.1 is not an accused at all in the said case. In spite of BA-756-11.sxw 2 Dixit specific questioning, he maintains that the mother is not an accused in that case either wanted or arrested. 4. The Application, so far as it relates to Respondent No.1, has become infructuous and stands dismissed as such. 5. If the Respondent No.2 is not an accused at all, there would be no question of ‘cancellation of bail’ as regards her. The learned Advocate for the Respondents states that he has no objection, if an order is passed to the effect that, ‘if the Respondent No.2 is an accused in the said case, her bail should stand cancelled’. 6. Based on his statement, it is directed that ‘the bail of the Respondent No. 2 shall stand cancelled, if she is an accused in the said case and if she is on bail presently’. 7. With this, the application for cancellation of bail stands disposed of. [A.M. THIPSAY, J.]