IN THE HJGJiCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURfC.G.I CONTEMPT PETmON N0: APPLICANT PETmONER 2005 N0N-APPLICANTS ^^rii^.-<g^^ >^' wff^- y'Smt. Kiran Pandey W/o Arvind Pandey Aged about -45 years, R/oSenior M.I.G, 728, Sector-2, Pt. Deendayal Upadhyay Nagar, Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS' 1) Dr. A.J.V. Prasad, S/o Ho+ <'^ou^ Aged about 48 yrs., Coramissioner and Higher Education Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur 2) Dr. Laxman Chaturvedi, S/o ^^he±^u,^ ' Aged about 57 yrs., Vice Chancellor, Pt. Ravi Shankar Shukla University, Raipur Contempt Petition under Article 215/ Constitution of India read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act. The applicant named above most respectfully begs to submit as under:- That, the applicant Is a permanent Professor, in the Pramila Gokul Das Daga Girls College, Kachahari Chowk Raipur (C.G.). And being a citizen of India. She is entitled for ail the rights as granted and inshrined by the Constitution of India. 2) That, the applicant had filed a writ petition on 04-05-2005 before this Hon'ble Court against the illegal and callous action of the management as well as the State and the University. The same writ petition ,-was registered as writ petition No. 3296 of 2005. And challenged the illegal action of the respondents/State. That, vide order dated 05-08-2005. This Hon'ble Court had become pleased to issue a direction to the non-applicants No. 1 and 2. And it was also directed that at the occasion of filing of detailed representation by the applicant alongwith the certified copy of the order. The competent authority shall considered the same IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURfC.G.V CONTEMPT PETmON N0./^-3 2005 ^^ ^'^l u ^'n> ,0 Req^>ndeat Bb» 2 T'^^' Reglstrar, »t, ItavisharkeE Shdela UniveEstty talpur (@tba^<dsgatlt) /t^, -^ HK3H COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Single Bench Hon'bte Shri H.L. Dattu, CJ. PETITIONER RESPQNDENTS Contempt Petition No. 123 of 2005 Smt. Kiran Pandey Versus Dr. A.J.V. Prasad and another Present: Shri P. M. Shrwas, counsel for the petitioner. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 28TH February, 2007) As on today, in my opinion, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- Chief Justice