:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1154 OF 2008 TAX APPEAL NO.1154 OF 2008 TAX APPEAL NO.1154 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax, ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Aldowiet Engineering Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.J.S.Saluja for the Appellant. Mr.S.J.Mehta for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, S.J.KATHAWALLA, S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2008 : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2008 : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Both the learned Counsel for the parties categorically state that the questions of law raised in the above Appeal have been squarely answered by the judgment of our Court in the case of CIT Vs. Neo Pharma Pvt.Ltd CIT Vs. Neo Pharma Pvt.Ltd CIT Vs. Neo Pharma Pvt.Ltd 137 137 137 ITR 879 ITR 879 ITR 879 against the revenue and in favour of the Assessee. In view thereof, the Appeal stands dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)