IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO.754 OF 1995 SUIT NO.754 OF 1995 SUIT NO.754 OF 1995 Bank of India ...Plaintiffs Versus Niraj K. Gupta ...Defendant None for the Plaintiffs. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : AUGUST 29, 2007. : AUGUST 29, 2007. : AUGUST 29, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. When this suit was called out on 13th August, 2007 it was noticed that in this Summary Suit of the year 1995 the Plaintiffs had not applied by way of Summons for Judgment for a decree. Hence, a specific order was passed by this Court directing the office to set down the suit for dismissal in accordance with Rule 227 of the High Court Original Side Rules. Notwithstanding the said order, the suit has been again set down under the caption of "directions". This is another instance which shows that the office of the Original Side is completely ignoring the orders passed by the Court. 2. None appeared for the Plaintiff on the last date. Today, when the suit is called out, none appears for the Plaintiff. Hence, suit is dismissed for non prosecution. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE