IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. 13525-M of 2008 Date of Decision: 17.7.2008 Sarabjit Singh @ Pappy and others. .....Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present:- Mr. S.K.Garg Narwana, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. I.P.S.Sidhu, Sr. DAG, Punjab. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This is a petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 204 dated 12.5.2008 registered under Sections 307, 323, 341, 506, 427, 148, 149 IPC and Sections 25/27/54/59 Arms Act, Police Station, Sanaur, P.S. Sadar, Patiala. Notice of motion was issued in this case. Counsel for the State on instructions from ASI Vijay Kumar submits that an inquiry was conducted by Sh. Devinder Singh DSP (Rural) in which he has found that commission of offence under Section 307 IPC and Sections 25/27/54/59 Arms Act is not made out and other offences are bailable. In view of the above statement made by the State counsel, the other offences being bailable, this petition for anticipatory bail in bailable offences is misconceived and is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. July 17, 2008 (Rakesh Kumar Jain ) rekha Judge