IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 408 of 2010 Date of decision:- 13.10.2010 Prithi Singh ......petitioner vs. Vir Vikram Singh and another ......respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. Naveen Daryal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. R.S. Kundu, Advocate for the respondents. HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) Mr. Kundu has filed an affidavit on behalf of respondents pointing out that the period of work charge service has been counted towards pensionary benefits and arrears have also been paid to the petitioner. Consequently, the same is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. However it shall be open to the petitioner to seek its remedy as may be available to them according to law in respect of any other subsisting grievance. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 13.10.2010 preeti