THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.25961 of 2006 Between: 1. V.Nageshwar Rao, s/o. late Rathaiah. 2 .B.Venkatesh, s/o. Janakirami Sastry. 3. K.V.Chalapathi, s/o. Daiva Prasada Rao. …Petitioners. and 1.The Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, rep.by its Commissioner, Tank bund, Hyderabad. 2. Dy. Commissioner, M.C.H.circle-III, Abids, Hyderabad. …Respondents. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.25961 of 2006 ORDER: The matter is coming for admission. Heard Sri K.Vinaya Kumar, learned counsel representing the writ petitioners and Sri Ganta Rama Rao, learned Standing Counsel representing for respondents, who had taken notice on behalf of the respondents. This Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate order or direction declaring the inaction of the respondents in maintaining the park situated adjacent to Mother Dairy, SBI Colony, Bakaram, Gandhinagar, Hyderabad, in the light of representations submitted by the petitioners on 29.11.2005, 04.01.2006, legal notices, dated 12.12.2005 and 15.06.2006 and also not expediting the road work (leading from Vaisrai Hotel to SBI Colony) as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of Constitution of India and to pass such other Orders. Several factual details are narrated and it is stated despite several representations made by the petitioners, no further action is being initiated in this regard. In the light of the facts and circumstances well narrated in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, in para Nos.2 to 7 in particular, this Court is of the considered opinion that the Writ Petition be disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the representations submitted by the writ petitioners, dated 29.11.2005, 04.01.2006, legal notices, dated 12.12.2005 and 15.06.2006 in accordance with law, as earlier as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this Order. No costs. ______________ (P.S.Narayana,J) 15.12.2006. vv/bsb