C.R. No.2033 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.2033 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.10.2010 Sukhdev Singh ……Petitioner VERSUS Pritam Kaur and another ……Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Retish Pandey, Advocate for the respondent. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent made statement at the bar that Judgment Debtor shall not interfere in the usage of the rasta by the plaintiff-petitioner in disobedience of the permanent prohibitory injunction decree. He further states that peti- tioner shall be permitted to use the disputed land as rasta in compli- ance of competent Civil Court’s decree. C.R. No.2033 of 2010 (O&M) -2- 2. In view of the statement made by learned Counsel for the respondent-Judgment Debtor, no further order is required. However, it is clarified, if undertaking furnished to this Court is not complied with petitioner shall be at liberty to take such legal action against the Judgment Debtor which is available under the law. 3. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( ALOK SINGH ) 26th October, 2010 JUDGE ashish