IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40139 of 2010 VIJAY MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 19.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Sahiyara P.S. Case No. 67 of 2009 registered under sections- 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the petitioner alongwith Rama Shankar Mahto committed rape upon the informant’s minor daughter on 04.07.2009 and, subsequently, the case was lodged on 17.07.2009. The contention of Learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner and informant; are Gotiyaz and as a matter of fact, some dispute took place between them for which an informatory petition was filed against the informant and others on 14.07.2009. Thereafter, the informant lodged this false case against the petitioner and others. He further submits that the medical evidence also does not support the prosecution story but I am not at all convinced with the above-said submission, there is specific allegation of rape against the petitioner. Hence, his prayer for bail stands rejected. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)