vs PA?iE No .3. ^•^^"wm- ^'xw" i^S*'3S4 5^1'''^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR M.A.(C) NoA°k\ /2010 ftPPELLANT DEFENDANT N0.3 £i:;l ..^CttlL .^..W.-.I.Q.. RESPONDENTN0.1 ^ELAIMANT N0. 1 IFFCO- TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, through the Branch Manager, Iffco- Tokio General Insurance Co.Ltd, 3rt Floor 345-347, Lalganga Shopping Mal, G.E Road Raipur (CG) V^RSUS Smt. Amrika Suryavanshi, W/o Late Pawan Suryavanshi Aged about 27 years. RESPONDENT N0.2 ^LAIMANT N0. 2 Ku. Shradha Suryavanshi D/o Late Pawan Suryavanshi Aged about 5 years.(Minor) Respondent No. 2 is minor, represented through Guardian mother Smt. Amrika Suryavanshi. RESPONDENT N0.3 CkAIMANT N0. 3 Pancho Bai Suryavanshi W/o Late Ramdas, Aged about 55 years. All three Above are R/o Village Koshmanda, Tahsil .-Champa, Dist- Janghgir-Champa(C.G.). RESPONDENT N0.4 DEFENDANT N0.1 RESPONDENT N0.5 ^tfEFENDANT N0.2 Jayram Gond, S/o Firtu Ram Gond, Aged about 25 years, R/o-Saliha Bhanta, Urga, Police Station- Urga, Tahsil & District.-Korba. (Driver of the Truck) Manager, M/s-Preminet Global Ltd., Ring Road No.-2, Raipur (C.G.) (Owner of Truck) ¥J?f%fe.a^@s ^ =AE^ T AA -l=^s 9t~^.S 9£.T & ./i Itfco-Tokio fieneraiInsuronce Co. Ltd. ?S«^.._..^^.aaA_- , yashwant Singh Thakur, Advocate for the aDoellant. h*h ^..-^. ftf'i.'s ^S.1* 1. Heard on admission. 2- The apDellant-Insurance ComDany has fiied this aDpeal under Section 173 Act. 1988 oaainst the award dated 22.1.2010 Accideiit Ciaimfi Tribuns! sassed bv +ha leifned 2 Addi+ional F'TCj, Janjqir (C6) ffor brevitv the clairns tribunal] in Claim Case No.60/2009 awardino comoensatlon to the tune of Rs.3.88,750/- to the ciai! 3. The resoondents No.l to 3/claimants. who ar'e wjdow and chiidren of the deceased Pawan Kumar, have filed a cfaim oetition under Section 166 of the Act before the ciaims tribunal statina therein thaf on 17,6.2009 at 'ith Raiu was comina towards trom Jata on the motorcycle bear'ina reaistrotion number C611-2418 and when they reac.hed near B.eniband Pond turn of Kosmanda. the truck bearjna reaistratjon number OR14-J-8516. driven Jn rash and nealiaent mnnner. dashed the motorcycte of the deceased as a result of which the deceased carne under the truck and died 'nstantaneously. Rsoort of the incident was lodoed aqninst the non-aDoiicant No.l in thi 'olice 5tation Chamoa, 5ince the claimants were deDendent on the deceasea' and due to his untimely death thev are unabie to mans themseives and therei Rs.23,00,000/- on varjou; 4. The clnims tribunal vide imDuaned award d'ated 22.01.2010 alloiived thi ie claimants Q! po the c!aim petition tiil the date ot actual payment. It W t wos neal •e neQSiaence it buf the ctaims of the deceased I vident thnt the deceasei instead of holdiTO thi Therefore, he nrayed that the amount of award be reduced suitably. Derused th< sDutably. the aDDellant - Insurance ComDanv has not obtainsd the ission under Section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act. 1988. which "170. Imote^ins snsurer* IH certasn cases.—Wherein the course of any iriauiry. the Ciaims Tribuna! is satisfiecf that t'fie ciaim is >S Taiiea insurer to .be re< ; iiable in r cn ciai roieadeci as a iDleaded shali there is insurer so !ce To tne Drovisions con+ained in sub-section (2} of section 149. the riqht to contest the claim on all or any of the arounds that are avdiiable to ." Tiie maT1 others reoorted in 2003'f3l TAC 293 fSO the Hon'bte ^@x r, ieia Tnu11<?'. '^. "31. We have already held that unless the conditions precedent specified in Section 170 of 1988 Act is satisfied, Insurance Company has no right of appeal to challengsthe award on'merits............." of the aDoeilant Insuronce ComDanv, in absence of Dei-mission under Section 170 of the Act 1988. is not maintainable 'ia T Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- N.K.Agarawa] le <;osrian/-