^" ^P ^s^i IN THE HIGH CQURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. o ^ / 2007 PETITIONERS v^^c .^>-'-' ~^~" ,<iSr ^^^•°...-•' q^^^,.--"' ^'v^ ^^-- .c°r ^^> ^. ^" o- : ^- Paras Ram Sahu, S/o. Shri Loknath Sahu, aged about 41 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Hr. Sec. School - Sihava, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) ^,2. Rajendra Kumar Shakshi, S/o. Shri Nathela Ram, aged about 40 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Hr. Sec. School - Sivaha, Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) RESPONDENT'S ILitfrII^ :»•»^TVf, <'i'®!'i'i».*-%'~ 'Ai ''>/J*S.^ .^'.'S '";, ''*.*>^~»»£ Scfh1 'f^' .si^'^^'" 1. State of The Secretary Department Tribai Weifare D.K.S. Raipur(C.G.) ^-2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare ChhattisgE Govt. Raipur 3, Assistant Commissioner, / Tribal Wetfare, Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTiCLE 226 OF TH! OF INDIA FOR JSSUANCE OF SUITABLE DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTSCE IN THE MATT XI-HC-78 *II*IMI sbw^ S^-qraRPT, (STfl^t'is, Rldl+l^< ^•P.C^rJs-~700f W^ 200 ^ 3Ti^?rira^? (^crfg^Er) 3II^T?)T^:IR> (Tsn'^TT^Tai^icb Bab'u WtTRRflfgHgn^r 'hl^vl^ ^WvftiffM <(i|WK ^3(1^311^1 Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, coujisel for the petitioners. AAr. Sushli bubey, ©opernment Advocate for the respondents/State. Vl/ith the consent of lea 'ned counsel appearing for the parties, the matters are heard f|nally and disposed of. Common order dictated |n W.P. (s) No. 707 of 2007 in open Court, passed separately. A copy of 1+',is order b^ placed on record in connected •<vrit petition. Sd^ SatishK^ Judgec ^ P.T.O. ^ M.i.em i-yyK !_yr (..nnfljj jioe-rtKn <°>! o.iLnorvK W. P.rS) No. 707 of 2007 Petitioner : Khilanond yaduraj Versus Respondents ; State of Chhcttisgairh andothers W. P.fS) No. 709 of 2007 Petitioners : Paras Rcsm Sahuand another Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh cnd others SB: Hon'ble AAr. Justice Sotish K. AgnihQtri, J Present: Mr. Ani! Singh Rajput, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sushil Dubey, (Sovernment Advocate for the respondents/State. OR & ER .,' Bablu -rt-h Passed on this 7T" doy of February, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing fo" the petitioners as we!! as for the State/respondents jointiy submit that the facts of the present writ petitions are similar to that of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushi! Tiwari csnd others vs. Stat®©overnmentof Chhatrisgarh &. others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. Tliey fur-ther submit that the question of law Involved is also the same. 2. In view of the cbove-stated submissions made by learnsd counse! for The parties. these writ pe+itions are aliowed in terms of the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by this Court in W.P. (5.) No. 5976/2006 (Sushi! Tiwari and others vs. State ©overnmentof Chhattisgar-h & other's). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record in other connected writ petition. ~-----————.-;_ .Sd^;...: Satish3K.l?