"} ^ t.Fl' D1 IN THE HIGH COITBT GF JUDICJKfy»E< eHH<? TISGA !__:_BILA3PUR. WRIT PBTITION N0< ajp QF 2001 PETITIONEKS $ s !• Food Corporafcion of I©dia^ Through- it(s Senior Regional Manager^ fiai^ur Regi^n^ Raipur^ (C.G^) 2* Disfcricfc Maaager, Pood Corporation of India, Raipur» DistrJLet-. Raipur (C.G.) • VLE__R S U S Shhattisgaxh, RESPONDENTS : : l^" TIaeState G£'Kada?alQC3systert(, Througto^ secretary^ Deparfcment of Food, Mantralaya, Raip^ir (chhattisgarta) 't^'-m-^••^^V ^ ^0< ^? ^"' ^y ^ ~ ..^^ / ^ 2^ Collecfeor Food Section Raipur^ 3^ Coiximissloner Raipur Division^ Raipur» (Chhattisgaria) 4, M/S Viaod Par BojLling Industry, Through- it€s sole Pxoprietor, Vlnod Kumar jajLn, Son ef late Shri L«C< Jain, I^@ JteB^H^^K l®H^NPiyR, Distriet-. Raipar, (Chhafctisgarh) k^. ^ WRIT PETITIGN UN03R AfSnCLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITOTION OF INDIA Xl-HC-22 ^"^ "^FTi^ra, '^"?TTT?, 'f^TRTy 'W1?(T^P71^^S:.^.&k..^ „ •^-^ •ST^^-^T fc^F ^^ ^RW^rflTf 28-10-2002 Shri B.P. Gupta, counsel for fhe petitioner, Shri Saojay K Agarwal, Dy, Adv, General for respondent No.l to3. Shri M. Shrivastava, counsel for the respondent No,4. It is fairly stated by Shri Ghipta, couiisel for fhe petitk>ner | that m view of the order passed ia W.P. No. 226/2001, he would not Uke to proceed with the wiit petition aad waats to withdraw tlie same, Accordiagly, ftie i petition staiids disposed of as j such. P.C. Naik Judge ^T^FTH ^T^ ^ ttr-3t TNT?R ^ 3TRR' .STT^ -'fe^v ^/:^ '%.