1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4111 OF 2010 (Ramesh Fakirchand Gujre vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 19, 2011 Heard Shri Sambre, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri Mujumdar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent nos. 1 and 2, and Shri Gilda, learned Counsel for the respondent no. 3. In the present petition, the grievance of the petitioner is in respect of order of suspension issued by the respondent Management. Be that as it may, it is brought to our notice by Shri Gilda, learned Counsel for the respondent Management, that enquiry against the petitioner is in progress and the same shall be 2 concluded within a period of six weeks from today. In view of the above referred facts as well as statement made by Shri Gilda, learned Counsel for the respondent Management, it will be futile to adjudicate upon the issue of suspension at such a belated stage when the departmental enquiry itself will be concluded within six weeks from today. Needless to mention that so far as payment of subsistence allowance is concerned, we expect the respondent Management to act in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard. With these observations, we dispose of the petition keeping the issues raised in the petition open. JUDGE JUDGE khj