IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 13TH MARCH 2009 / 22ND PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 8021 of 2009(W) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------- KAIRALI MARKETING & PROCESSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.A.986, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, ALLEPPEY-688 001. BY ADV. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) SRI.V.K.RAJANANDAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE (PA) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURE OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 8021 OF 2009 (W) ==================== Dated this the 13th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner states that in pursuance to Ext.P1, they were designated to procure paddy, and that acting upon the said direction, they had procured 4347.84 metric tons of paddy. Petitioner submits that in terms of Clause 5 of Ext.P1, they are entitled to handling charges, which according to them has not been paid so far. Urging their claim in this behalf, petitioner has filed Ext.P6 before the 1st respondent. Orders have not been passed on that claim either. It is in these circumstances the writ petition is filed. 2. Now that the petitioner is staking their claim for handling charges in pursuance to Ext.P1, and as a final decision on the claim has not so far been taken by any of the respondents, I dispose of this writ petition itself directing the 1st respondent to pass orders on Ext.P6. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 3 months of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp