HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAIW: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CKANDRAKAR,J Applicants Appellants M.C.C.No. 866 of 2011 1 Neel Kanth S/o Prahalad Nishad R/o C/o Adhirdas S/o Janaki Das Bangali Bagdehi Para, Nava Para (Gobra)Tehsil & Distt Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 Adhir Das S/o Janki Das Bangali R/o Bagdehi Para Nava Para (Gobra) Tehsil & Distt Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Non-applicants Respopndents Versus 1. Kanhai Ram S/o - Mansha Ram Patel Age 45 years 2 Puniya Bai W/o Kanhai Ram Patel, Age 44 years 3 Sauhadra Bai D/o - Kanhai Ram Patel, Age 05 years 4 Vishnu S/o Kanhai Ram Patel Age 12 years Respondents No.3 & 4 Minor through Natural father Kanhaiya Ram Respondent No.1. All Resident? of Rajim Distt Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 5 The Oriental Insurance Co. Pvt Ltd., Through Divisional Manager Circle No.1 Jail Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Application for restoration ofM.A.C. No. 68 of 2010 M.C.C. No. 866 of 2011 Present : Shri Uttam Pandey, counsel for the petitioners. ORDER >th (12InDecember,2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. On due consideration, I.A. No.01/2011 is allowed and the delay in filing the restoration petition is hereby condoned. 2) Shri Uttam Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners is heard on the restoration petition. 3) The petitioners are seeking restoration of M.A.C. No.68 of 2010 which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide orderdated 18.06.2010. 4) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, we are satisfied that the absence of the petitioners' / appellants' counsel on 18.06.2010, when M.A.C. No. 68 of 2010 was taken up for hearing was based on bona fide grounds. 5) M.C.C. No. 866 of 2011, therefore, is allowed and M.A.C. No.68 of2010 is restored to its original number. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge subbu