IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 6692 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 6692 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 6692 OF 2007 Smt. Pamela Rose Daniels & ors.... Petitioner versus Joseph Cardijn Technical School and others ...... Respondent. Ms. K.C.Michani for the petitioner. Mr. Clive D’souza for respondents 1,2,4 to 6. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 01ST DATED; 01ST DATED; 01ST OCTOBER, 2007 OCTOBER, 2007 OCTOBER, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The petitioners are original plaintiffs who filed a suit for declaration and perpetual injunction, apprehending dis-possession at the hands of the respondents/defendants without following due process of law. In the said suit the petitioners produced eight documents, some of which have been exhibited whereas the other documents have not been exhibited on the ground that the same are not proved in accordance with provisions of the Evidence Act. The petitioner’s evidence is yet not over and they have a chance to prove the said documents in accordance with the law. Hence at this stage I do not propose to interfere with the impugned order. Leaving all questions raised in the petition open to be agitated at an appropriate stage before appropriate forum, Writ petition is thus summarily dismissed. In view ofthe dismissal of the writ petition, the civil application is also dismissed. ...