: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.79 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.92 OF 2008 Virbasappa Balasaheb @ . Shivalingappa Ghugare & Ors. ....Appellants V/s. Vijay B. Ghugare & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.Amit Borkar for the Appellants. Mr.G.S. Godbole for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2008. P.C. : 1. There is no warrant for interfering with the refusal to grant any interim reliefs. The Appellants case is based on the alleged partition of the year 1927 in which the suit property allegedly came only to the share of the Appellants’ father. 2. It is contended that though no interim reliefs have been granted since the suit was filed in the year 2001 at the appellate stage, interim reliefs ought to have been granted in view of the cross-examination of the Defendant. According to the Appellants, in the cross-examination the partition is admitted and so is the Plaintiffs’ possession. : 2 : 3. Prima-facie it appears that the admission, if any, is only by a person from one branch of the family. Defendant Nos.6, 7, and 8 for instance belong to the other two branches. The admission therefore, will not, atleast prima-facie bind them. 4. Faced with this, the Appellants sought to protect their exclusive possession of the property. No interim reliefs in respect thereof had ever been granted. I see no reason to grant any interim reliefs today. The application for interim reliefs today is founded upon the cross-examination. It is contended that the exclusive possession of the Appellants is admitted. The cross-examination properly construed contains no admission that the Plaintiffs are in exclusive possession in their individual/personal capacity to the exclusion of all other members of the family. 5. In the circumstances, the Appeal from Order is dismissed. The Civil Application is accordingly dismissed. Ad-interim relief was granted ex-parte without notice to the Respondents. There has been no interim reliefs for seven years. In the circumstances, the application for extension of the ad-interim reliefs is rejected.