7. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 774/2010 • SANDEEP SAHNI Petitioner Through: Dr. Sushil Kumar Gupta, Advocate with l^r. Amit Sahni, Advocate versus CBI Respondent Through: Ms. Sonia l^athur, Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Ahuja, Inspector, CBI, EOU, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI ORDER % 09.02.2011 A status report has been filed by the CBI limited to the point raised by the counsel for the petitioner on the last date of hearing and recorded in the order dated 14.12.2010. The present petition is filed by the petitioner under Sections 397/401 of the Cr.PC praying inter alia for quashing of the order dated 26.08.2010 passed by the Special Judge (CBI), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in SC No.15/09/08 arising out of FIR No.EOU-I/2005-A-0010. On the last date of' hearing, counsel for the petitioner had submitted that the main grievance of the petitioner is that despite pendencyof an applicationfiled by the petitionerpraying interalia for framingseparatechargesagainsthim and for conductingseparatetrial CRL.REV.P. 774/2010 Page 1 of 2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified and despite the fact that arguments were address on the said issue, the Sessions Court has not considered and decided the same in the impugned order. Limited to the aforesaid aspect, the CBI has filed a reply stating inter alia that notice was not issued on the aforesaid application filed by the petitioner in the trial court and no specific order has been passed in the aforesaid application. It is submitted by the counsel for the CBI that in view of the fact that the order on charge has already been passed on 26.08.2010, the application filed by the petitioner has been rendered infructuous. Be that as it may, as it is stated that the next date of hearing in the matter is fixed for tomorrow, learned Special Judge (CBI) is requested to dispose of the pending application of the petitioner one way or the other, in accordance with law. The petition is disposed of. A copy of this order be given dasti to the parties under the signatures of the Court Master. FEBRUARY 09, 2011 rkb CRL.REV.P. 774/2010 HIMA KOHLI,J Page 2 of 2