1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.32 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2337 OF 2009 Nabisaheb S. Patil .... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents And Shahab Ahmed Abdul Sattar .... Applicant/ Intervener AND CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.62 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2337 OF 2009 Nabisaheb S. Patil .... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents And M/s. Star Enterprises .... Applicant WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2337 OF 2009 Nabisaheb S. Patil .... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents 2 S/Shri A.S. Khandeparkar i/b R.B. Jaiswal for the Petitioner. Shri N.P. Pandit, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri V.A. Thorat, Senior Advocate with Ms Shakuntala Mudbidri & Shri Aziz Khan i/b Divya Shah & Associates for Respondent No.3. S/Shri R.M. Thakkar i/b A.S. Tungare for Respondent No.4. Ms Mamta Sadh i/b Shri Joseph Fernandes for Respondent No.5. Shri Y.R. Shah for the Applicant in C/S-No.32/2010. Shri V.T. Dubey for the Applicant in C/S-No.62/2010. CORAM: J.N. PATEL AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED: APRIL 16, 2010 P.C: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. The prayers in the chambers summons are strongly objected to on the ground that the petitioner is claiming through the applicants in the chamber summons and it is alleged that they are hand-in-glove with each other. Our attention is also drawn to the fact that the petitioner is prosecuted by the applicant and the criminal trial is pending. After considering the affidavit in 3 reply, we do not find any merit in the prayers as the applicants in the chamber summons have independent remedy to claim damages against the petitioner. Hence both the chamber summons are dismissed. The writ petition to be listed on 20-4-2010. J.N. PATEL, J. A.P. BHANGALE, J.