IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA THURSDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2008 / 7TH CHAITHRA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1091 of 2007(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.27603/2006 .................... PETITIONERS IN WPC: ------------------------------------ 1. KIZHAKKELVALAPPIL RAJAN, S/O.KUMARAN, THEJUZ, EACHUR P.O., KANNUR. 2. P.P.SURENDRAN, SASIKALA NIVAS, KADACHIRA P.O., KADAMBOOR AMDOM DESOM, KANNANNERI, KANNUR. 3. SUDHEER KUMAR, MATHAN HOUSE, KIZHUTHALLY P.O., KANNUR. 4. M.K.SUKESH, MANIKOTH HOUSE, KIZHUTHALLY, THAZHE CHOVVA, KANNUR. 5. MATHAN SUMITHRA, KOROTH HOUSE, MISSION COMPOUND, CHOVVA, KANNUR. 6. MATHAN BABU, KOROTH HOUSE, MISSION COMPOUND, CHOVVA, KANNUR. 7. MATHAN BABY SUDHA,KOROTH HOUSE, MISSION COMPOUND, CHOVVA, KANNUR. 8. MATHAN SURENDRAN, KOROTH HOUSE, MISSION COMPOUND, CHOVVA, KANNUR. 9. MATHAN SUDHEESH, KOROTH HOUSE, MISSION COMPOUND, CHOVVA, KANNUR. 10. K.C.MADHAVI, NALLAKANDY HOUSE, MAVILAYI P.O., KANNUR TALUK, CHOVVA, KANNUR. 11. SUJATHA, NALLAKANDY HOUSE, MAVILAYI P.O., KANNUR TALUK, CHOVVA, KANNUR. 12. RATHI.N., NALLAKANDY HOUSE, MAVILAYI P.O., KANNUR TALUK, CHOVVA, KANNUR. 13. NIRMALA.N., NALLAKANDY HOUSE, MAVILAYI P.O., KANNUR TALUK, CHOVVA, KANNUR. 14. VANAJA N.K., NALLAKANDY HOUSE, MAVILAYI P.O., KANNUR TALUK, CHOVVA, KANNUR. 15. USHA, NALLAKANDY HOUSE, MAVILAYI P.O., KANNUR TALUK, CHOVVA, KANNUR. 16. LATHA, NALLAKANDY HOUSE, MAVILAYI P.O., KANNUR TALUK, CHOVVA, KANNUR. 17. UDAYABHANU N.K., NALLAKANDY HOUSE, MAVILAYI P.O., KANNUR TALUK, CHOVVA, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.SERGI JOSEPH THOMAS RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT IN WPC: ------------------------------- ISHITHA ROY, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY WORKING AS THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSHKUMAR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.HEMA, J. ----------------------------------------- Cont.Case (C).NO.1091 of 2007 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th March, 2008 J U D G M E N T Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that Exhibit P3 is not disposed of only because the reasons beyond control. The above order in L.A.R.No.126 of 2002 has been challenged in appeal, LAA.161 of 2006 with a petition to condone the delay. Hence, without disposing of the appeal, it may not be possible to dispose of Exhibit P3. This submission is recorded. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that a direction may be given to dispose of Exhibit P3 within a reasonable time after disposal of LAA.161 of 2006. Hence, respondents are directed to dispose of Exhibit P3 expeditiously as possible after disposal of L.A.A.161 of 2006. With this direction this petition is disposed of. K.HEMA, JUDGE vgs.