1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6076 OF 2008 Vilas R. Ghumare .. Petitioner Versus The Regional Joint Director (Sugar), Pune and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Y.S.Jahagirdar, Senior Advocate i/b. G.S.Godbole for petitioner Mr.V.P.Sawant i/b. P.M.Jadhav for respondent Nos. 3 and 4 Ms.Jyoti Pawar, A.G.P. for State. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, CJ. & A.P.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 25th August 2008 P.C. . One of the contentions raised before us while impugning the order dated 11th August 2008 is that the petitioner was neither given the notice nor was he heard. Therefore, according to the petitioner the order suffers from basic infirmity of violation of principles of natural justice. This argument has been raised inter 2 alia but we do not propose to discuss the merits or otherwise of the matter in view of the stand taken by the respondents. It is stated on behalf of the official respondents that they do not have any objection in hearing the petitioner as well as other parties and pass appropriate orders. Until that time, the order impugned in the present petition would not be given effect to. It is further stated that they would pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and in any case not later than four weeks from today. 2. In view of the statement made on behalf of official respondents to which the learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 4 also does not have any serious objection, we dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent No.1 to hear all parties and pass appropriate orders within four weeks from today. No costs. The impugned order will not be given effect to till 3 the final decision is taken by respondent No.1 and the same will be subject to the order which will be passed by the authorities. ( CHIEF JUSTICE ) (A.P.Deshpande, J).