-!S3?~ /?^..J\ 1 ^S^s^*-1""*'^ ^ V}TC| ^WIVW. U-S\W\d, Rril'tiy'i *1l*l«l^TT^ ....UQ. ^.2.^7.. <s.?. ?. /./.°i- • • • • <w. ^••'••-•••••••••••••••... .^. 311^91 tRq? ('jclljcl^) 3n^?iwR-ii<b ?raT3ni?idi*ficb swrsR^ifeTsn^CT PETITIONER: -vd RESPONDENTS: rsus- t1. 5. 14. (Writ Petition under Artic Single Bench: Hon' 27-11-2008:- Shri Santosh Yadu, couns^l Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Advcjc Heard. By this petition, the petitij Annexure P-1 dated 24.10.2008i posted as Tahsildar in Tahsil- B^i Tahsil- Narharpur, District-Kanke( <ni<<[no1i iiinVtffe^) •(lut'^K ^3rf^gn^?r Ku. Silly Thomas, D/o Thomas Abraham (Tahsildar), aged about 34 years, R/o Tahsildar Berla, Distt: Durg (CG) State of Chhattisgarh, through Upper Secretary Revenue and Disaster Management, Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt: Raipur (CG) The Collector Durg, Distt: Durg (CG) State Election Commission, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) Election Commission of India, through- Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission of India, New Delhi l|e 226 of the Constitution of India) Itle Shri Dhirendra Mishra, J. for the petitioner. ;ate General for the respondents ner has impugned the transfer order of whereby the petitioner, who is presently •la, District-Durg, has been transferred to ll*l»l^IT^ \3w| '«i«irt«, y-rf|<H<|d, Rri|'dy<( ,.^.'.?:C.S2..^..I.^^ ^200 311^51 q^^ ('yljd^) ant?rwT R-iicb (T8IT3lAs'(5BWP 5 ?^ntR^lfl(T3II^?T ? Learned counsel for the pi been passed by the respondent present place as the petitioner w Annexure P-3 dated 13.10.20081 18.10.2008. Learned counsel for the p< frequent transfers and the same medical leave. The petitioner h< transfer order of Annexure P-3, to District-Durg on the ground th; representation was not consider^ again subjected to transfer by th( to Narharpur, District Kanker. From bare perusal of the| above transfer order has been pi Chief Election Officer of the Stat^ resident of District -Durg and th|< Court, her transfer to a different questioned only on the ground of| The petition being devoid is accordingly hereby dismissed •b|tifn<!1iiiinT^'fat^l ^Rl^M ^3ll^»T3n^?T jtitioner submits that the above order has (ithin a short duration of her posting at the ^s posted at this place only vide order of and vide order of Annexure P-2 dated lititioher further submits that it's a case of (as been passed while the petitioner is on |is filed representation against her earlier [i/hereby, she was transferred from Arang ^ Durg is her home district. However, her ^d and only after short duration, she has impugned orderfrom Berla, District Durg impugned order, it is observed that the ^ssed in compliance of the direction of the The petitioner, on her own admission, is irefore, in the considered opinion of this istrict ori administrative ground cannot be Frequenttransfers. )f substance is liable to be dismissed and the admjssion stage itself. Dhirendra Mishra Judge