HIGH GCMJRT OF GWWn-ISGARHATBH-ASPUR W.P. No.lS32of2004 Petitiohers 1. Khwaja Gulam Ahrned, Aged abut 32 years, S/p Shri G.M. Ahmed, District Presidsni M.p. AbnuBandhit Kustha Kiarmehan Samiti, Ambikapui', Dist, Sargup^hhattjsgarii) 2. w ^/\JF £ <'• 3 5. AshokKumarPandey.Asedabout yeare, 8/oLateShriRqaramPandey, NMA, Sector-Wadrafnagar, Dist. Sarguja (Ghhaiffisgarfi) Biharf Lal Singh, Aged about 31 years, S/o Shri Ram Chandra Singh, N.MA. Sector —Dsonagar, Rainanujnagar, EMsfrict Saiguja (ChhatUsgarh) Neraj Kumar Singh, /^ed about 32 Years, Sft^Shn Bunlesh Singh, N.M.A. SectO!"—Bhusu, Stepur, Oist. Sasguja <Chhaffisgarh) Raj Mangat Singh, /^ed about 33 years, Sfe Shri Harihar Singh, RAa (^darpur, Dist. Sarguja <ChhatBsgarh) RameshKumarRajwade.Agedabout 30 years, S/o Sfui Ram Pyari Ra^wsSe, R/o PHC-7, Bha^ara (Uatr^,Di^.Safguja<ehhaffisgari^ Prabhu Narayan Sahu, Aged about S&years, S^SHriJokhanRaHiSahU, N.MAfSectoF-Jainssar.R/oVillage Rampa, Pfl. Surasayr, DistrkA Sarguja, (GhnatfisgarM) Vereus Respondente 1. Stet& of GhhatEisgahr, Through the ' : S^tetatY, pi^^ t^W^^ ^ Vteffars, I3.K^. Bha%®n,Sflantrateya, fia^j.it ^ttatB^art^ ^ Direetor Healtfi SefVicss, Govemraent o^ChhatfegaFh,l:?aipU''(C;hhaffisgarh) GtsfR^^^-^rosy ©fflcer, Oistrict — 6. 2. 3. IShiaf' MBdiral & l-teaifh Officer, ^urguja {Crthafflsgart^ Djsfrict Collector, Suiguja (ChKattjsgafti) ? 6; Jila Kustha UnmulanSaniiti, Through te Secretery, Sarguja ^Ihhattisgatfi) 7. Uraon of 'ndsa, Through ihe SecretEBy/Ministry DeRartmerA df Hea . FamilyWelfare, New Delhi. SB: Hon'bte Mr. JusSceSatish K. Agnihotri, J ShnJjtendraPai(,Advocateforttiepetitioners. ;_ Shri S. K. BeRwal.StaridingGounseSforth&FsspondentNo. 7. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Depiity Govt. Advocats for the respondente No. 1 toS. <y' ^. QR&ER ( Passed on this 21st dayof Marei-i, M07) ThefoltowingorderoftheCourt is passed bySatish K. Agnihofri, J. 1. BythispeGtioni!nderArficte226Q27bfthe Constitution of Indja the petitioners seek to challenge the legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 22.6.2004 ^nnexure P/T), whereby their services hav'e been terminated, in visw of the ordsr issued by ttie Govemmerrt of !hdia,Directsrateoff-fealthServtGes,NewDe!hi;afteroRemonthQfthe orderdated 22.6.2004. 2. The petitioners wereaRpointed of various poste in the year 1994 vkie various orders (Annexure P/3) ynder the terms and eonditions iaid down in the sasd orders. Tftsreafter the petifioners continued to work qn the same pest til! the impugned order dated 22.6.2004 ^nnexure P/1) was psssed ghnng sffect to after a psriod of one month fram that .'date.• ' • - -1 . . • . .' ; ' : -• . • , 3. Leamed counsel apRearing for the pstitioners, as wetl as for th® respondents submit that the facts and question of law involvect in ftte presentpetiBonJSsimilartOthatin^theWritPetitionNo. 1794/2003 ^ar^h KtmrarSatoVs.State^Cfthaffisgarh&othet^whiishwas disposed <rf vide'orcterdated 28362003, whereinithas bsen direcfed that "if the petitioner mafees a representetjon ts'ithirTa peripd of qffis fflonthfromtoday.cpncernedauthorityshaHlTOKiritothemgt^ ^ 'hakui ttieser/JcesOfthfrpetitionercanbeabsorbedthenttieycanGonsider his casafor absorptton/appointment." 4. tn viewofthe above.this petition stancte disposed of with the directfon thatifthepeGBoner'stnakearepresentationtotheeoncsmedauthority wthin ffperiod<rfonemonttift<3m{odayt it shalicohsjder and dscide tihe same on ite own merite. in accordance wjth taw, wthin a reasonabfe period. If it is permitted to absGrb the peti'Boners, then they shouldconsider theirGasesforabsoiption/re-appointmentJnssrvices. Consequentiy.MOAOPNo. 1732/2004 and 40252004 stenddisposed ^. : : .1 ! ' .. .'—-„ Sd/'- ' satisilK.Agmhotri / Judgc