IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10640 of 2010 1. POONAM KUMARI, W/O SANJAY PASWAN, R/O VILLAGE BENGWAHI, P.S. RANIGANJ,DISTRICT- PURNIA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIAHR. 2. THE COLLECTOR,ARARIA. 3. THE S.D.O., ARARIA,DISTRICT- ARARIA. 4. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, DISTRICT- ARARIA. 5. THE B.D.O. RANIGANJ, DISTRICT-ARARIA. 6. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, BLOCK- RANIGANJ, DISTRICT-ARARIA. 7. THE MUKHIYA, null GRAM PANCHAYAT PARSAHAT,P.S.- RANIGANJ, DISTRICT-ARARIA. 8. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PARSAHAR GRAMPANCHAYAT ,P.S.- RANIGANJ, DISTRICT- ARARIA. 9. ANITA KUMARI, W/O BRAHAMDEO PASWAN, R/O VILLAGE BENGWAHI, P.S. RANIGANJ, DISTRICT- ARARIA. ----------- 2/ 21/06/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner questions the appointment of respondent No.9 on the post of Angan Bari Sevika claiming better eligibility. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that certain enquiries were also held in which the stand of the petitioner was vindicated. Notwithstanding the submission of a representation before the District Magistrate on 12.6.2008 who was competent to decide the issue, the matter remains pending. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the disposal of this application with directions to the District Magistrate to dispose off the petitioner’s representation after hearing all concerned, including respondent No.9, by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of six months from the date 2 of receipt/presentation of a copy of this order before him. Appeal shall lie to the Commissioner of the Division by the aggrieved against him. The application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)