IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 47 of 2010 Date of decision: 25.11.2010 Lower Lohara Cooperative Cho Reclamation and Soil Conservation Society …Petitioner. Versus The State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vivek Thakur, Addl. A.G. For the applicant: Mr. Saneev Kuthiala, Advocate. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) 1. Shri Ajay Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner states that as far as relief (a) is concerned the same has been granted to the petitioner-society. He submits that as far as the reliefs (b) & (c) are concerned, in view of the affidavit of the Registered Cooperative Society dated 7th October, 2010 wherein he has stated that action shall be taken in accordance with law, he does not press this petition at this stage. 2. The petition is dismissed with liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court again if he finds it necessary. 1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes. 2 3. In view of the dismissal of the main petition, it is not necessary to decide CMP No.560 of 2010 for impleadment of the party moved by Gopi Ram, applicant. It is, however, made clear that I have not dealt with the merits of the contention of the parties as to whether Gopi Ram was a necessary party or not and the application is being disposed of only in view of the withdrawal of the petition. In case, applicant Gopi Ram has any grievance he can raise the same before the appropriate authority if permissible under law. 25th November, 2010 (Deepak Gupta) ™ Judge