THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.630 OF 2004 Date: 9.4.2010 Between: Smt. Saroja ..... Appellant AND The Commissioner of Land Administration, Hyderabad and another. ...Respondents THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No.630 OF 2004 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) This writ appeal is directed against the order dated 11.2.2003 of the learned single judge made in Writ Petition No. 4851 of 2000, whereby and whereunder the learned single judge allowed the writ petition filed by the 5th respondent herein. The facts in brief are that the 5th respondent, who is the writ petitioner filed the aforementioned writ petition before the learned single judge challenging the order of the 1st respondent dated 6.3.2000, whereby the 1st respondent confirmed the order of the 2nd respondent. It is the case of the writ petitioner that she has purchased an extent of 90 sq. yards comprised in Plot Nos. 49 and 50 of Naveen Nagar situated in Survey No. 126 of Yousufguda village, Hyderabad District. She also claimed to have constructed a house thereon. However, subsequently, when she came to know that the land purchased by her was a Government land, she approached the third respondent seeking regularisation of occupation of the said land. The third respondent in turn, directed the Mandal Revenue Officer, Khairatabd Mandal, the 4th respondent herein, to inspect the said land and submit a report and basing on the report of the fourth respondent, the third respondent directed for issuance of a patta in favour of the writ petitioner on payment of the market value of Rs. 6,000/-. Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant herein preferred an appeal before the Collector, Hyderabad, the 2nd respondent herein, who, in turn, allowed the said appeal by cancelling the patta certificate issued in favour of the writ petitioner. Thereafter, the writ petitioner preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Land Revenue, the 1st respondent herein, which also ended in dismissal. Feeling aggrieved the writ petitioner preferred the aforesaid writ petition. The learned single judge while taking into account the fact that the appellant herein did not comply with Condition No.3 of the patta certificate and also the fact that the Revenue Divisional Officer has allotted the land to the writ petitioner in accordance with G.O. Ms. No.331, dated 21.4.1991, has allowed the writ petition through the impugned order. Aggrieved by the order of the learned single judge, the appellant filed the present appeal. When the appeal has come up for hearing today, learned Government Pleader for Revenue has placed before us a copy of the proceedings bearing No. C1/B2/535/1996, dated 22.12.2009 issued by the District Collector, Hyderabad, wherein it was stated that through proceedings dated 21.12.2009, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad has issued possession certificate to Smt. Surekha Rani, D/o. Smt. Saroja, the appellant herein, accommodating her at Flat No. 17 Ground Floor of Afzal Sagar. The said proceedings are taken on record. While recording the submission of the learned Government Pleader that possession certificate has been issued in favour of the appellant herein allotting her a flat at Afzal Sagar, the writ appeal is closed. No costs. ___________________ T.MEENA KUMARI,J Date: 9th April, 2010 _________________ SANJAY KUMAR,J pnb