IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER FRIDAY, THE 13TH JULY 2007 / 22ND ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 10484 of 2007(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- ANNIE T.K., W/O.ANTO, AGED 42 YEARS, JUNIOR FULL-TIME ARABIC TEACHER, G.S.R.C.L.P.SCHOOL, MULLASSERY, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENTS: -------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION JAGATHY, TRIVANDRUM-14. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VALAPPAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 6. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MULLASSERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 7. THE CORPORATE MANAGER, CORPORATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY ARCH-DIOCESE OF TRICHUR, CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP'S HOUSE, THRISSUR-680 005. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADERSMT.M.R.SREELATHA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX (WP.10484/07) EXT.P1: COPY OF INSPECTION REPORT DT. 29/6/2005. EXT.P2: COPY OF ORDER DT. 15/9/2004. EXT.P3: COPY OF ORDER OF APPOOINTMENT DT. 28/9/2004/2/11/2004. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DT. 16/7/2005. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF PROCEEDINGS DT. 14/11/2005. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DT. 25/4/2006. EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF APPEAL PETITION DT. 18/5/2006. EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF CIRCULAR DT. 29/8/1992. A.K. Basheer, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No.10484 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 13th day of July, 2007. J U D G M E N T It appears that petitioner was initially appointed as a Junior Full Time Language Teacher in the school under the management of respondent No.7. However later, the Department took the view that there was no sanctioned post . This was done after approving the appointment of the petitioner and also after declaration of probation. Anyhow it is on record that petitioner had unsuccessfully challenged the order passed by the Controlling Officer before the Director of Public Instruction. 2. Learned counsel submits that petitioner has preferred a revision petition before the Government against the order of the Director. Ext.P13 is stated to be the memorandum of revision petition. He submits that petitioner will be satisfied if an appropriate direction is issued to respondent No.1 to take a decision on Ext.P13 expeditiously. 3. Learned Government Pleader submits that if Ext.P13 has been preferred as contended by the petitioner, a decision thereon will be taken without any delay. In the above facts and circumstances the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and pass orders on Ext.P13 strictly on its merit and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to mention that the petitioner shall be afforded sufficient opportunity to be heard before any orders are passed. A.K. Basheer an. Judge.