IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 20TH MAY 2011 / 30TH VAISAKHA 1933 WP(C).No. 13503 of 2011(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.S.MOHAMMED SAMEER, M/S.K.K.IMPEX, DOOR NO.X/11, UC COLLEGE P.O., ALUVA-683102. BY ADV. SMT.T.RADHAMANY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER-II, ALUVA. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, APPEALS, COMMERCIAL TAX, ERNAKULAM. 3. INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, MATTANCHERRY. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.P.PRADEEP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ....................... W.P.(C).13503/2011 ....................... Dated this the 20th day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT After passing Exts.P1 to P3 orders by the Deputy Commissioner cancelling the original assessments for the years 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05, Exts.P4 to P6 notices were issued proposing to revise the assessment, by the first respondent, the Commercial Tax Officer , which were responded from the part of the petitioner, by submitting Exts.P7 to P9 replies. After considering the facts and figures, the first respondent passed Exts.P10 to P12 revised Assessment Orders; against which, the petitioner has preferred Exts.P13 to P15 appeals along with Exts.P19 to P21 petitions for stay which are stated as pending consideration before the second respondent-Appellate authority. Petitioner is stated as aggrieved by Ext.P22 RR notice issued by the third respondent without any regard to the pendency of the above proceedings. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the second respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate W.P.(C).13503/11 2 orders on Exts.P19 to P21 petitions for stay, in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Coercive proceedings pursuant to Ext.P22 shall be kept in abeyance, till such time. 4. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition before the second respondent for taking further steps. Writ petition is disposed of as above. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, Judge mrcs