IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43530 of 2010 1. PAPPU YADAV @ LALHA 2. ARVIND YADAV @ THULBA, BOTH SONS OF YUGAL YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 2.2.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 120 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners were refused bail by an order dated 28.6.2010 vide Cr.Misc.No.43028 of 2009 but were granted liberty to renew their prayer for bail after framing of charge. It has been submitted that even before the present order was passed charge was framed on 4.5.2010. Considering the same, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Addl. District Judge, F.T.C. Vth, Lakhisarai in S.C.No.87 of 2010 arising out of Lakhisarai P.S. case No.122 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor shall be the brother/father/mother of the petitioners and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the 2 petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash,J.)