IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.54804 of 2007 KAUSHLENDRA KUMAR SINGH, Son of Late Dineshwar Prasad Singh, resident of Village- Mojari, P.S. Sheosagar, District- Rohtas ------------------ Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Raghav Das, Son of not known, resident of Village- Samardiha, P.S. Sasaram (M), District- Rohtas ------------ Opp.Parties. ----------- For the petitioner: S/Sri Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr.Advocate Mithilesh Kr.Singh, Advocate For the State: Sri M.N.Jha, A.P.P. ---------- 04 27-09-2010 Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the State. The sole petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has only made a prayer for quashing of the F.I.R. i.e.Sasaram ( T) P.S. Case No.516 of 2007 registered under Sections 467,468,420 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while pressing the present petition, has submitted that it was a case of purely civil dispute. Earlier in Title Suit No.107 of 1992, some order was passed in favour of the petitioner. It has further been submitted that in relation to the same occurrence, earlier also a case was instituted vide Sasaram( T) P.S. Case No. 520 of 1991, in which the police after investigation submitted final form showing the dispute as civil dispute , which was finally accepted by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas . On the aforesaid ground, it has been prayed to quash the F.I.R. of Sasaram ( T) P.S. Case No.516 of 2007 2 registered under Sections 467,468,420 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State has opposed the prayer of the petitioner. I have perused the F.I.R. of Sasaram( T) P.S. Case No.516 of 2007, which has been registered for offences under Sections 467,468,420 of the Indian Penal Code. The F.I.R. discloses commission of offences and, as such, I do not find any merit in the present petition. Besides this, the petition is liable to be rejected on the ground that without pendency of any proceeding before the court below, a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not sustainable. The sole prayer in the present case has been made to quash the F.I.R. In the entire petition, there is nothing to suggest that after investigation, chargesheet was submitted or not. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected. In view of rejection of this petition interim order of stay dated 26.3.2010 stands automatically vacated. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned Superintendent of Police. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)