AB 1969/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K MERUNO Heard Mr. TJ Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. BS Sinha, lear ned Addl.Public Prosecutor for the State in AB No. 1969 of 2011 and AB No. 2014 of 2011. These two bail applications have been filed against the same FIR filed by the complainant, Anowar Hussain on 04.06.2011 alleging mis-appropriation in t he name sub-teachers of Assamese Department with regards to financial assistance of ‘ 6000/- per month totalling amount of ‘ 72,000/- by way of secret conspirac y. Though he is also entitled to receive the said assistance, he has been left o ut at the moment as being mis-appropriated by the accused persons named in the F IR. The petitioner in AB No. 1969 of 2011 is the principal of the said College n amely, Numberpara was Anchalik Junior College and the petitioners in AB No. 20 14 of 2011 are the president of the Executive Committee of the said college and two other executive members of the said college. After hearing the learned couns el for the petitioners as well the learned Addl.P.P. who has read out from the case diary which has been furnished by the Investigating agency, the statement o f which recorded in this court presumes as per the submissions of the learned Ad dl.P.P. The learned Addl.P.P. is mainly stressing on the submission of the clear k of the college who has made a statement contrary to the statement that has bee n made by the petitioner. The petitioner has also relied on the additional affid avit on which a copy of the resolution dated 17.05.2011 has been annexed. It is the submission of Mr. Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioner that the compl ainant himself was a member of this department and has also signed the said reso lution and his name is at serial No.12. Considering the resolution of the Executive Committed held on 17.05.2011 and als o the role of the said college for the year 2010-11 which is annexed at Annexure 2 to the additional affidavit. It is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the FIR was lodged by the complainant on 04.06.2011 after th e resolution have been adopted and the complainant had participated in the said resolution. Considering the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the parties and the relevant documents as relied upon by the learned counsel, I am of the view t hat the Investigating Agency needs more time to complete its investigation. Howe ver, for the perusal of the bail application and the materials raised before thi s Court, I am of the view that the petitioners would be enlarged on pre-arrest . It is therefore directed that in the event of the arrest of the petitioners in AB No.1969 of 2011 and AB No.2014 of 2011, the arresting authority shall release the petitioners in connection with Abhayapuri Police Station Case No. 182 of 20 11 ( CR Case No.273 of 2011) under sections 120(B)/ 420/409/352/294/506/34 of th e Indian Penal code on bail of ‘ 10,000/- each with one local surety of like am ount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. With the above observations and directions, these two anticipatory bail applicat ions stands disposed of.