1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.6668/2010 Sunil Vs. State Date of order : 16/7/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Ashvin Garg for the petitioner. Shri Amit Punia, P.P. for the State. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that even in the FIR that has been lodged by the husband of the prosecutrix, it is stated that the prosecutrix left her house on the very third day of marriage and the husband even expressed doubt over someone, who ultimately was found to be petitioner, by the police. Statement of prosecutrix has already been recorded wherein she has alleged that no rape was committed upon her. On the contrary, from the tenor of her statement, it revealed that she herself went with the petitioner out of her own free will. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into 2 consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail. In the result, this bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Sunil S/o Bhikharam shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No.142/2010, P.S. Nawalgarh, Distt. Jhunjhunu for offence u/s.363, 366 and 376 of IPC on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/