IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI BILAL NAZKI, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 12588 of 2005 Between: Konda Brahmam Raju S/o. Kotam Raju R/o. Kondur Village, Atchampet Mandal, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, P.S. Kosur, Guntur District. 2 The Station House officer, P.S. Bellampally, Guntur District. 3 The Circle Inspector of Police, Sathenepally Circle, Guntur Distirct. 4 The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District. 5 The Director General of Police & Inspector General of Police, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 6 The Home Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus direct the Respondents herein to prioduce the detenus namely i) Konda Raju Bhadra Raju S/o. Brahmam Raju, aged about 28 years, Occ; Agriculturist R/o. Kondur Village, Atchampet Mandal, Guntur District. ii) Jemmalamadugu Yesu, aged About 25 yrs, Occ: Labourer R/o. Mannesulthanpalem. iii) Valla Danial S/o. Venkatratnam, aged about 22 yrs, Occ: Labourer R/o. Mannesulthanpalem, Bellamkonda Mandal, Guntur District before this Hon'ble Court and record the statements of the detenus and set them free and basing on their statements, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct them Respondent No.5 herein to punish the erring Police Officials and award appropriate compensation to the detenus herein and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.RAGHUNATH Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following : O R D E R (Per the Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, ACJ) In response to the allegations of wrongful confinement of the detenus, it has been stated in the counter-affidavit that they were arrested in connection with certain offences and were produced before the Magistrate, who has remanded them to judicial custody. In this view of the matter, no further orders are necessary to be passed in the writ petition, which is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. However, the petitioners may work out their remedies in appropriate forum. __________________ (Bilal Nazki, ACJ) 22nd June, 2005 __________________ (G.Chandraiah,J) vrn To 1 The Station House Officer, P.S. Kosur, Guntur District. 2 The Station House officer, P.S. Bellampally, Guntur District. 3 The Circle Inspector of Police, Sathenepally Circle, Guntur Distirct. 4 The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District. 5 The Director General of Police & Inspector General of Police, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 6 The Home Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 7 Two C.Cs to the Advocate General, High Court Buildings, A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 8 The Section Officer concerned, PIL Cell, High Court Buildings, A.P., Hyderabad. 9 The Secretary, A.P. State Legal Advisory Board, High Court Buildings, A.P., Hyderabad 10 The Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 11 Two C.D copies. 12 The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Hyderabad.