IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 75 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 75 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 75 OF 2007 Shivraj K. Singh ... Petitioner. V/s. Union of India and Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. Ramprakash Pandey i/by Mr. Uday Shankar Samudrala. Mr. Sureshkumar for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 20th April, 2007 : 20th April, 2007 : 20th April, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act-1996 (for short, "The Arbitration Act-1996"). As respondents, though necessary, yet not measured the work done by the petitioner. There is an arbitration agreement between the parties. The petitioner has already invoked the said clause of arbitration. The constitution of the Tribunal is in process. However, considering the fact that even otherwise, it is necessary to have measurement of construction work done by the petitioner, I am inclined to grant order in the following terms. ( 2 ) 2. The respondents to take joint and final measurements of the work within three weeks. Petitioner to approach the respondents’ office within a week. 3. In view of this, the petition is disposed off. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]