•:.^i:.^"W(:S' ffilSi IN THE HICH GOURT O.P 3'UD3:eATU 0£ NADHX& PRADS.SH AT. JAB,ALPH t8K-St;:Siet±tJ.onl3Stl^'t~te£9&. .- .^^233', •EBT32E'I©^E•03SB3SK:- •WWE<XS.S 226 &•: S'2'7 O'P.'Hffi, G0KSTI'Em'T&N©BT»D3:A. ' PETl'riONEB. P atidar Furniture Ho-use , Proprletor Deojibhaipatel.son of Premj'i BhaiPafcel, aged 5X years, New Timber Harketa Pataaih,\ Raipur. >(M.P.) versus '/^^^ w /^^ ^^&^ ,• RESPONDSI'TTS -. C !'• Additional CommarcialTax/Officer, Raipnr Circle I, civil Linesl, Raipur. (K»P,) 2. Divisional Deputy Cfcimttiissioner of Commercj.aI Tax, Civil Lines, Raipur. (M.P.) / 3. State o£ Madhya Pradesh, • TKrough the Secretary, Department of Commercial Tgxes, Vallabh Bhawan. Bhopal -462,004 fto<v •& r^—^^^.'"^^^ °'^mi&AOV^^^^ »6MTA3!LS OF THB PETITXON PETITIQNER RESPONDENTS Present:- HIGHCOURTOF CHMATTISGARH: BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.3947 OF .1998 Patidar Furniture Mouse Versus Additional Commercial Tax Officer & Others (Writ Petition underArticles 226 & 227 ofthe Gonstitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K.Agnihotri, J. Gowri ' ^ None for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 6th dayofJuly, 2011) The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor is any representation made on behalfofthe petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want 6f prosecution. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge M ^::;i iffl f'a 13