IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8895 of 2011 Date of Decision 04.11.2011 Saroj Gupta --Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and another --Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.R.B.Gupta,Advocate,for the petitioner Mr.Balraj Gujjar,Advocate, for the complainant RAKESH KUMAR JAIN,J: (Oral) In this case, learned counsel for the petitioner had made two statements which are patently false. Firstly, he had stated that no charge has been framed against the petitioner whereas learned counsel for the complainant has shown a copy of the charge sheet dated 03.3.2011 in which charge is framed against the petitioner and secondly he had stated that the charge could not have been framed because there was a stay by this Court but the said order was passed after the framing of charge. But still after arguing for some time, when he failed to persuade the Court, he prays for withdrawal of this petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. 04.11.2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) rr JUDGE