IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Writ Petition No. 1676 of 2004 Saibaba Video Games .. Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the Petitioner. Mr. F.R. Shaikh, APP. for the Respondent. CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & S. RADHAKRISHNAN, JJ. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, JJ. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, JJ. DATED : 30.08.2004. DATED : 30.08.2004. DATED : 30.08.2004. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr. Saraogi for the Petitioner. Dr. Shaikh, APP. appears for the Respondents. All that the Petitioner is praying is that the application for grant of video licence be decided at the earliest. Dr. Shaikh has no objection. In the circumstances, we direct the Respondents to decide the pending application at the earliest. The only thing which we observe in that context, is since, the Application is for video parlour and which it is sought to be set up in the sub-way at the Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus, the Respondents should consider, whether at such a location a video parlour ought to be permitted. The Petition stands disposed of. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)