IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44594 of 2009 RAM AWADH SINGH S/O BALESHWAR SINGH R/O VILL NASIRPUR AKAWANI,P.S.NARHI, DISTT-BALIA(U.P.) ……PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 02. 21.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is stated to be the husband of the deceased against whom initially a complaint case came to be filed namely Complaint Case No. 632©/2005 and later on it was registered as a police case as Simri P.S. Case No. 151 of 2005. According to the initial complaint lodged, the marriage of the petitioner was performed with the deceased Sunita Devi sometime in the month of May, 1994. Allegation is that subsequently there was demand and harassment for dowry and she died in unexplained circumstances. Submission of the counsel is that the case has been instituted on wrong assumption of facts and in fact realizing the mistake even a petition in this regard came to be filed by the complainant way back in the year 2006 before Chief Judicial Magistrate. Looking at the time frame when the marriage was solemnized and the so called incidence does not seen 2 very convincing and that the petitioner is willing to cooperate in the trial though trial has begun but only one witness has been examined, let the petitioner Ram Awadh Singh, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 15,000/-(fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.D.J., F.T.C.-V, Buxar in connection with Simri P.S. Case No. 151/2005(S.Tr. No. 422/08). Both the sureties will be executed by the close relative of the petitioner on due identification of the Court below. Petitioner will cooperate in the trial and appear on each and every date either himself or through his counsel. If he commits breach of the conditions, he may loose privilege of bail granted to him. Shageer (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)