IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45398 of 2008 SUJIT KUMAR SINGH, S/O SHAMBHU NATH SINGH, R/O VILLAGE- PURANDAH, DOGHARIA, P.S.- KOCHADHAMAN, DISTRICT- KISHANGANJ Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 08/12/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under sections 370, 372 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and section 16 of the Child Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Act 1986. The informant in his written application has alleged that his daughter aged about 14 years was called by Binod Mahto, thereafter she disappeared. Submission is that the daughter of the informant has given her statement under section 164 of the Cr.P.C. in which she has stated that she was called by the wife of Binod and left at Chapra and she has married with Dharmendra Kumar according to her own will. Further submission is that the case was lodged on account of confusion and later on compromise petition has been filed in the court below. The victim in her statement under section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has not named the petitioner Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Sujit Kumar Singh is directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Kishanganj in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 233 of 2008. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)