IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 14410 of 2008 Between: N. Srinivas S/o.Pentaiah R/o.Sy.No.282, Information Colony Amangal, Hayathnagar, R.R.District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Andhra Pradesh Bhudhan Yagna Board, Gandhi bhavan Hyderabad, rep.by its Secretary 2 The District Collector, R.R.District, Lakidikapool Hyderabad 3 The Tahsildhar, Ibrahimpatnam Revenue Mandal Ranga Reddy District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue any appropriate order or direction or a writ more particularly a writ one in the nature of writ of mandmaus declaring the inaction of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in not evicting the illegal, encrochers from houses bearing Plot Nos.67 & 68 in EWS Bhudhan Lands Sy.No.2 Nallakancha, Ibrahimpatnam village and Mandal, R.R.District allotted to the petitioner and handover the possession to the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal, null and void consequently evict the illegal, encroachers from plot Nos.67 & 68 in EWS Bhudhan lands in Sy.No.2 of Ibrahimpatnam village, and mandal, R.R.District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SHAIK ANWAR PASHA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 14410 of 2008 Order: The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that he made a representation dated 11.01.2008 to respondent No.2-District Collector as well as respondent No.3-Tahsildar, requesting them to evict the illegal encroachers from Bhoodan Yagna Board Houses bearing Nos.67 and 68, situated in Survey No.2 of Nallakancha, Ibrahimpatnam village and Mandal, R.R. District, which were allotted to him, vide patta No.B/4094/2004, dated 14.08.2004, but till date no action thereon had been taken. Hence, he filed the present writ petition. When the matter is taken up for admission, none appeared for the petitioner. In spite of granting sufficient time, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has not reported any instructions in the matter. He, however, agreed to dispose of the writ petition at the stage of admission itself with the following directions: Respondent Nos.2 and 3, namely the District Collector, R.R. District and the Tahsildar, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, R.R. District, are directed to consider the representation dated 11.01.2008 of the petitioner, and take necessary action in the matter in accordance with law, expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 15.07.2008 Nsr