IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. } $ 4%; OF 2005 . + VV, WV Rw g W PETITION©E% bi ’j ‘ /¢ JIP. Mishra S/o Lat€ Shri Durga Prasad Mishra Aged about 50 years, Cwxmmmggm; Raipur (C.G.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Department of Co- operative, D.K.S. Building Raipur (C.G.) Deputy Registrar, Co—operative Societies, Near Co—operative Bank, Rajbandha, Raipur‘ (C.G.) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE ONSTITUTION OF INDIA. . van ‘ / W C XI-HC-22 24 25.4.2005 Mr. L.C. Dash, caunsel. for he petitionEr. t Mr. Bhaskar Pyasi, Pancl Lawyer for the State. Heard. By way of thi$ petition under Article 226 / 227 of the Constitution the. petitioner has questioned the legality and propn'ety of order dated 10. 1 1.2004 (Annexure- P'— 1) whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Raipur Division to Dantewada DiVision. The case of the peti‘ioner is that the senioiity of Class—III employees are being maintained division Wise whereas by way of the impugned transfer order the petitioner is being transferred to another v division. Further case of the petitioner is that petitioner’s Wife is working as Assistant Teacher in the Education Department at Raipur rand as per State Government policy husband and wife who are working in the Government departments, as far as possible, be posted at one place. Further case of the petitioner is the treatment of his son, who is mentally sick, is going on and prOper medical facility is not available at the transfer place. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner may be allowed to make a repre sentation to respondent No.1 along with copy of this petition raising all his grievances and respondent No. 1 be directed to decide his representation, to which counsel for the respondents have no objection. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having regard to facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is allowed to make'a representation along with copy ofthis petition within a period i ima Ag‘ m «ale/e? XI-HC-22 WW mm mmmm 65mm?W§wWK WW L «A éawm of 01m week from today to raspondent No. 1 raising all his grievances and in tum respondmlt No.1 is directed to decide the replesentation of the petitioner within anot her one month from the date of receipt of the representation in an ohjective manner after considering all the grievances raised by the petitioner in accordance with law. With the direction aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.W.P. No. 1205/05 & LA. Nos.3014[05~ also :tands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. // Sd/- f / L.C.Bhadoo Judge