:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 535 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 535 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 535 OF 2006 Smt. Vithabai Bajirao Bagal ..Petitioner versus Somnath D. Bagal & Ors. ..Respondents Shri S. M. Sabrad for the Petitioner. CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY,2006 DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY,2006 DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY,2006 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : . The First Appellate Court has furnished cogent reasons for vacating the interlocutory order of injunction in paragraphs 4, 7 and 8 of the impugned order. Interference of this Court at the interlocutory stage, under Article 227 of the Constitution, is not warranted. Petition is dismissed. . However, it is clarified that all the contentions of the parties on merits are kept open at the trial. The learned Trial Judge shall dispose of the suit uninfluenced by any of the observations in the impugned order. Subject to the aforesaid, the Petition is dismissed. :2: (DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)