IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Review Application (MCC) No. 821 of 2011 In Writ Petition (S/S) No. 627 of 2008 Harish Chandra Agarwal ...Petitioner Versus State of U.P. and others …Respondents. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) 1. Heard Mr. Alok Dalakoti, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. H. M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand on review application. 2. The writ petition was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 2.9.2011. However the direction was that the post retirement dues, which were pending be given to the petitioner. The post retiral dues have been paid to the petitioner. Since there was no direction regarding the interest on post retiral dues, he has filed the present review application. There is no occasion for adding such direction by way of a review application. The grounds to review an order are extremely limited. Since grounds are not available to the applicant, the review petition (MCC No. 821 of 2011) is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. 3. In view of the above, it is not appropriate to pass any order in the Delay Condonation Application. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 14.12.2011 Kuldeep