IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29149 of 2010 KIRAN DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being a lady is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Sections 447, 341, 323, 325, 307,504,506/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that initially Tunni Bind and Vijay Bind gave 10-15 Lathi blows to the mother-in-law of the informant and when she fell down the petitioner assaulted the victim. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the injury report suggests that either the informant has not seen the occurrence or some developed version has been recorded in the fardbeyan because against the alleged assault of giving 10-15 blows there are only three injuries caused to the informant’s mother-in-law of which injury nos. 1 and 3 are lacerated marginal size whereas injury no. 2 suggests that the teeth of the injured was uprooted. It is further submitted that fardbeyan does not reflect that any injury 2 was caused to the mother-in-law of the victim by assault of the petitioner. Considering the contradictions between nature of allegation in the fardbeyan, the injury report and the fact that the petitioner is lady and neighbour of the informant, let the petitioner, Kiran Devi, be released on bail in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Hilsa (Karai Pasurai)P.S. Case no. 92 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. Hilsa, Nalanda, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)