HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10829 of 2008 Date: 09.11.2010 Between : E.Subramanyam Reddy & others. …….Petitioners And The District Collector, Chittoor District & another. ….Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10829 of 2008 ORDER : In this writ petition, the petitioners seek directions by way of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents in interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment over their land admeasuring Ac.0.20 cents, Ac.0.40 cents and Ac.0.20 cents respectively, in Sy.Nos.128/5 and 128/6, situated at Vemuru and Pangam villages of Tirupati Rural Mandal in Chittoor District, as illegal and arbitrary. It is the case of the petitioners that they are the owners and possessors of the aforesaid land and that there is standing mango garden, supported by a Well, for irrigation purpose, in the aforesaid land. It is the grievance of the petitioners that the respondents are trying to interfere with their possession over the aforesaid land illegally, without acquiring it under the Land Acquisition Act. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents, that without any cause of action, the petitioners have approached this Court and that the respondents are not interfering with the possession of petitioners over the land in question. In view of the statement made by the learned Government Pleader that the respondents are not interfering with the possession of petitioners over the land in question, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the possession of petitioners over the land admeasuring Ac.0.20 cents, Ac.0.40 cents and Ac.0.20 cents, covered by Sy.Nos.128/5 and 128/6, situated at Vemuru and Pangam villages of Tirupati Rural Mandal in Chittoor District. However, it is made clear that if the possession of petitioners is unauthorized, this order will not preclude the respondents from taking steps in accordance with law. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 9th November 2010 ajr