WPSS No. 473 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate on behalf of Mr. N.K. Papnoi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Brief Holder for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. Mr. V.K. Kohli, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. I.P. Kohli, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the advertisement No. 2 of 2009 by which applications were invited by the respondents on various posts. The grievance of the petitioner is, that he is a contract labour and as per the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Steel Authority of India and others Vs. National Union Water Front Workers and others, [2001 (91) FLR 182], the petitioner was entitled to be given the preferential treatment of relaxing the condition of age and other academic qualifications which has not been mentioned in the advertisement and, consequently, the petitioner is entitled to apply for the said post. In this regard, the petitioner has raised his grievance before the Deputy Labour Commissioner which is pending consideration. Considering the facts and circumstances that has been brought on record, I dispose of the writ petition directing the Deputy Labour Commissioner to look into the grievance of the petitioner and pass orders accordingly after hearing all parties concerned within three months from the date of the production of a certified copy of this order. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 25.06.2010 Shiv