IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY, TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT. THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3030 of 2008 Between: M.Manik Niwas Rao. … Petitioner. AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Wakfs and Minorities Welfare, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad, represented by the Secretary and three others. …. Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri B.Nalin Kumar. Counsel for the respondents: Asst.Govt. Pleader for Revenue for R.1 & R.2. Sri Abdul Nazeeb Khan for R.3 and R.4. THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3030 of 2008 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus to set aside order dated 20-7-2007 issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad, respondent No.2 herein, in his proceedings No.H/1287/2006. Heard Sri B.Nalin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abdul Nazeeb Khan, learned Standing counsel for respondents 3 and 4. A perusal of the impugned proceedings shows that the Chief Executive Officer, A.P. State Wakf Board (respondent No.4 herein) issued proceedings dated 30-6-2005 under Section 54(3) of the Wakf Act, 1995 (for short “the Act”) and in the process of execution of the said order, the impugned proceedings were issued. When the Court pointed out that the petitioner has got an alternative remedy by way of approaching the A.P. Wakf Tribunal (for short “the Tribunal”) under Sections 54(3) and 83(2) of the Act, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that copy of order dated 30-6-2005 passed by respondent No.4 has not been communicated to the petitioner, whereby he was disabled from approaching the Tribunal. In the light of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent No.4 is directed to furnish a copy of order dated 30-6-2005 to the petitioner within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Liberty is given to the petitioner to question the said order as well as the order impugned in this Writ Petition before the Tribunal under Sections 54(3) and 83(2) of the Act. For a period of two weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of order dated 30-6-2005 by the petitioner from respondent No.4, the impugned proceedings shall not be given effect to. Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 14-2-2008 Note: Registry to communicate operative portion of this order by wire at party’s costs. (BO) MNR