IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 26530 of 2008 Between: Vasireddy Mahesh S/o. Sharabaiah R/o. Torregudipadu Village, Nandigama Mandal, Krishna District, presently Residing at Keerakalapadu Village, Kanchikacherla Mandal, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Krishna District at Machilipatnam. 2 The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nandigama, Krishna District. 3 The Circle Inspector of Police, Nandigama, Krishna District. 4 The Station House Officer, Kanchikacherla P.S., Krishna District. 5 Are Vasundara Devi W/o. Rambabu R/o. Thimmapuram Village, Koresapadu Mandal, Prakasam District. 6 Are Rambabu S/o. Subba Rao R/o. Thimmapuram Village, Koresapadu Mandal, Prakasam District. 7 Battini Sujatha W/o. Krishnaiah R/o. Thimmapuram Village, Koresapadu Mandal, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondent police to produce the wife of the petitioner viz., Sai Sudha Rukmini, aged 20 years, who is presently in the illegal custody of the respondent Nos. 5 to 7 herein before this Hon'ble Court and to handover her to the petitioner herein, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.VENKAT YADAV Counsel for the Respondent No.: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION No.26530 of 2008 ORAL ORDER : (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R.Varma) When the matter came up for consideration, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and, therefore, nothing remains for adjudication in the writ petition. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA _________________________ JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO 23-06-2009 Msr. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION No.26530 of 2008 23-06-2009 (Msr)