IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.1824 of 1984 Date of Decision.13.12.2013 Smt. Chhindo (deceased) through Gurdev Singh and others .......Appellants Versus Sadhu son of Gulab and others ......Respondents Present: Mr. B.S. Sra, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Hemant Sarin, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? Yes 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? Yes 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not prepared to argue and makes a lame excuse that records of the lower Court is not available. 2. The second appeal is dismissed for default of non- prosecution with costs. Counsel's fee Rs.5,000/-. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 13, 2013 Pankaj* Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2013.12.17 12:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh