H COURT Oi Tifi "i'i l 'iiS^S ^iF\.n. . SSii^^.^- liNGLE WW_PETmONiSl NQ.ZOfie.OE 2007 iSCTiTI 4 Sevak Ram Patel, S/'o. Late Shr'. Sonau, aged about 59 years, R/o. ViSlage & Post Amera, Tehsi! Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (C.G.) Ajay Patel, S/o. Shri Ghanshyam, aged about 50 years, Village Lavanvan, Post Pangaon, Tehsii Baioda Bazar, District Raipur (C.G.) Thukel Dheemar, S/o. Jhadi, aged tbout 58 years, R/o. Villag®Lavanvan, Post Pangaon; Tehsi! Baloda Bazsr, District Raipur (C.G.) Agrahit Sshu, S/o. Pusau, aged sbout 56 years, R/o. Village & Post Risda, TehsiS Baioda Basar, Districf Raipur (C.G.) Srichand Sahu, S/o. Kejau Sahu, aged about 53 yea"s, R/o. Viilage Rajpur,. Post Karahl, Tehsii Baioda Eezar, DistrictRaipurfC.G.) . COM'^^-i '^*tf*f ^ ^^H^ NT: 2. ^tis^^ ftf Chhstt3p,n??Th Thrrlij^h '-^^—'^^. l»1'i ^^' ^ i ^ -^^M^^-t^^^t.i i B t ^ < ^ i ^/Vq.^ 3 ^i Tt^ - -^- •- .' . - . - • • -j, Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantrataya, D.K.S- Bhawa", Raipur (C.G.) Ena'neer in CHIEF JUSTICE Public Works Department, Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Shri Sushil Sahu, counsei for the petitioners. Svis. Deepali Pandey, Panel Lav/yer for the State / resDondents. <> •CK (Passed on 03rd Apfii, 2007) ty this petit'on, isarnsd counsel appear'sng for the oetitioners submits that the oetitioners namelv, Sevak Rarri Pate!. Aiav Patsi. Thuka! Dhesmar, Srichand Sahu anc Acrahit Sahu wsre emoioved on 01.01.82. 07.03.73. -^' 05.05.72, 18.9.79 and 25.5.69, respectively as Gangmen. The petitionere, who 'nave worked for more than 15 years have attained the status of permanent Gangmen. They seek a relief that the petitioners being perrnanent gangmen be retired at the age of 62 years in accordance with the Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Ssvak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu)Adhin!yam, 1987 (for s'nort 'the Act, 1967') read with Fundamenta! Rule (for short 'F.R.')56. 2. Accord'sng to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petifioners have attained the status of permanent empioyees, as defined under Rute 2 (c) of the Chhattisgarh (Workcharged and Contingency Paid Emp'oyees) Pension Ruies, 1979 (for short 'the Rules,1979'5, framed under Artjcle 309 of the Const'rtution of india. After having attained the status of the permanent empioyee, the petitioners would retire op. attaining the age of 62 years on superannuation underthe provissons ofthe Act, 1967. 3. Learned counsei appearing for the petttioners woufd submit that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the iecision of thls Court passed on 4"' Januar/, 2007 ir, 'A'.P. No.108./2Q05 (Govind Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ofners) and other connectecj matters. 4. Learned counsel appear'ng for the respondents/State doss not disputs the submlssions macte by learned counsel for the petitioners. ^- 5. AccordingSy, the petitioners, who are permanent gangmen, are entitled to retire on attaining the age of 62, years In accordsnce with the Act. 1967. The petltion is accordinai'v ailowed. No order as t6 costs. —~—^ <A^ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge