CWP No. 1098 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION: 22.01.2010 Subhash Chander ...Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana & Others …Respondents CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI PRESENT: Mr.N.K.Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.RKS Brar, Addl.A.G., Haryana Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.RKS Brar, Addl.A.G., Haryana who is present in Court has been asked to accept notice on behalf of the respondents. With the consent of the counsel, this petition is disposed of at motion stage. The petitioner has joined the respondents-Department as Baildar on 16.7.2004. He was having ITI qualification at the time of his appointment. He was promoted as T-Mate vide order dated 14.2.2008. The petitioner is claiming higher pay scale on the basis of technical qualification possessed by him. The petitioner made a representation (Annexure P-7) claiming pay scale on account of his qualification, but no decision has been taken CWP No. 1098 of 2010 2 thereon. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the respondents are directed to take a decision on the representation. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take a decision on the representation (Annexure P-7) within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is furnished to the competent authority. Needless to say, in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, it shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 22.01.2010 MFK