IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34009 of 2011 Bijoy Marandi son of Mohan Marandi Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 17.10.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 353, 302, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 3, 4, 5 of the Dian Act. Considering that there is no specific overt act alleged against the petitioner and he undertakes to be personally present on each date during trial, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Banka in connection with S.C. No.313 of 2011 arising out of Chandan (Anandpur O.P.) P.S. Case No.123 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor shall be Dilip Hansda, brother-in-law of the petitioner and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he - 2 - shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner shall be physically present on each date during trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, his bail shall stand automatically cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )