(1/ HEQH GQURT OF GHHATTESGARH QT B!L1E:Sf-‘UR DNI$§QN EENGH GOPAM: HQN’BLE SHR! H‘L. DATTU, QJ, 4% HGN’QLE $HR§ QR. DE$HMUKH, J. WE'Et Paiiiarg M35 of ‘m92 1‘ Rakesh Kumar Goyal 810 Sm RC, Goya! aged about 45 years, present!y posted as the In—charge Executive Engineer, PWD Durg Division Durg {(36) Cg.“ 2‘ Deepak Kumar Ptadhan S/o RS Pradhan aged about 48 years, Dresentty postad as the Offg. Executive Engineer. PVJD Divisian, Kondagaon {CG) Suresh Sharma, Slo Late SR Sharma, aged about 43 years, preaentiy posted as in-charge Executive Engineer, PWD Division, iiaepur(CG) 4. DKr Sahgal, S/o Shri riot known, aged about years, presently posted in- Charge Executive Engineer, PWED Division, Raigarh (CG) Umashankar Sahu 8/0 8P. Sahu, aged about 43 years, presently posted as Offg. Executive Engineer, PWB Division No.2, Raipur (CG) 8r Ajay Trivedi, S/o Shri KK, Trivedi, aged about 45 yeare, presently posted as incharge Executive Engineer, PWD Division No1, Raipur (CG) Ashok Kumar Mancihan, Sfo Late Soeumai Mandhan, aged about 44 years, preeentiy posted as incharge Executive Engineer, Naiionai Highway Division No.2, Raipur (CG) 8. Arum K Chakrabaity, Sie Nani Gopai Chakrabaity, aged 44 years, presentiy posted as Offg Executive Engineer, evvo Division Noe, Raipur (co) Raiu Saiwant iviangruikar, Sio VR. Mangruikai, aged about 45 years, presentiy posted as in—eharge Executive Engineer, PWD Division, Mahasamund (CG) 10‘ SKParoha Sio D_Kr Paroha Aged about 51 years, posted Executive Engineer, National Highway, Biiaspur (CG) 0) O‘i i\ CD Versus \.- Respondents Sanjay Rusia, Sub Divisionai Officer PWDr, B& R Sub Dn, Nofi, Jabaipur / / Writ petition under Articles 22$!227 0f the Congtituticn of indie. Present : 8hri Amrito Das, coun5$3 for the petitionerS. Shri VR. Tiwari, counse3 fer respendent Nofl, 8hr; Sumesh Bajaj, GA. for the atate, URN. QRDER (Passed on WEE April, 20W} The fanowing oral order of the Court was passed by EALL. Era’eée, GJ. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioners states that as on today the reiiee sought for by the petitioners in this writ petition, would not survive for consideration of this Court. {2) .aking note of the statement made by teamed counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition ie of (MP) 2‘ Staie of Madhya Pradesh Thmugh Secretary, Lok Mantrafaya, Vallabh Bhawan, (MP) 3‘ EngineeF-in—Chfef, MP‘PJ/VD‘ Saipura Bhawan, Bhopa! 4. C.P. Agrawal, Assistant Engineer, O/o Engfneer in Chief; P‘WD. Bhawan, Bhgpa! v, 5. Siate of Chhattisgarh Secretary, Pubiic Warks Mantralaa, D K S Ordered accordingly. sdl_ MT" Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh A‘ i ~47; :4 e ‘