WP(C) 2406/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P.KATAKEY Heard Mr N Medhi, learned counsel for petitioner. Also, heard Dr B Ahmed, learne d standing counsel for the irrigation department appearing for respondent nos.1, 3,4 to 8, and Mr D Gogoi, learned counsel for respondent no.2. As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is t aken up for disposal at the motion stage itself. Grievance of the petitioner, in the present petition, is for non-payment of a sum rupees three lakh ninety-eight thousand two hundred and fifty-three wh ich, according to petitioner, is due and payable for the works done by him. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the matter in issue has alre ady been answered in Tamsher Ali -vs- State of Assam & ors, 2008(4) GLT 1 and as such urged that this matter may also be disposed in terms of the directions con tained therein. In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Chief Engineer, irrigation department, Chamdmari, Guwahati, to verify the claim of th e petitioner and on such exercise if any amount is found to be due and payable t o him, his name shall be enlisted in the register maintained by the department f or that purpose ~ in terms of the directions contained in Tameher Ali’s case(su pra) ~ and payment shall be made chronologically. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.