HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RE8PONDENTS WRTTPETmON(Q No.ll3of2007 Durga Motor Service Jiten Prasad Aged about 80 years, S/o Shri Ava^iada Prasad Sao, Bus Stand, Ambikapur, Distt. - Sarguja (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State Transport Authority D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Secretary, State Traiisport Authority, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETmQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTETUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Asnihotri. J. Preseiit: Shri Sonikant Yerma, Advocate for the petitioner. Slm Shashank ThaJair, Paiiel Lawyer for Ihe State/respondents. Shri Santosh Gupta, Advocate for fhe interveners. ORALORDER itS (Passed on 24m day of November, 2008) 1. Withtheconsentoftheparties,thematteristakeniq)forhearingfinally. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits tiiat the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage as nolhing survives for adjudication. However, the respondent-aufhorities may be directed to consider and decide the application ofthe petitioner, in case he makes a fresh application for grant ofregular pennit, in accordance with law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible. 3. Leamed counsel appearing for the other side have no objection. 4. Shri Thakur, leamed Panel Lawyer for the respondents submits that in case, a li-esh application is made, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible. 5. In view oflhe foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. 6. Consequentlv, I.A. No. 840/2007 and 886/2007, also stand disposed of. Aniit Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge