THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 721 of 2010 Dated: 23.02.2010 Between: K.Lakshminarayana Reddy … Petitioner And K.Kesava Reddy and 5 others. … Respondents THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 721 of 2010 O R D E R : The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.371 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anantapur. The suit is filed for partition and separate possession of his 1/5th share in the suit schedule property. Pending the suit, the 6th respondent herein filed I.A.No.741 of 2008 under Order 1 Rule 10 of C.P.C. with a prayer to implead him as a defendant to the suit claiming that the 5th defendant acquired title to suit property under a gift deed dated 25.11.1991 and one Bhumireddy Kalayavani purchased the said property from the 5th defendant and made it into house plots and out of the said plots he had purchased one plot under a registered sale deed and was put in possession. Thus, it was contended that he was proper and necessary to the suit. The Court below, after hearing both the parties, by order dated 11.02.2010, allowed the said application. Aggrieved by the same, the present revision petition is fled by the plaintiff. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the material available on record, I do not find any justifiable reason to interfere with the said order. The Court below, on appreciation of the facts and circumstances and for the detailed reasons assigned, arrived at a conclusion that the presence of the 6th respondent herein was essential for effectual and complete adjudication of the controversy between the parties. Such discretion exercised by the Court below does not warrant interference by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The contention of the revision petitioner/plaintiff that the 6th respondent who purchased the plot in question during the pendency of the suit did not acquire any valid title and that he was brought into picture at the instance of the other defendants to the suit only to defeat the rights of the plaintiff, needs no consideration at this stage. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. . _____________ G. ROHINI, J. Date: 23.02.2010 KLP