WP(C) 3543/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C. UPADHYAY Heard Mr. H. Hoque, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Mr. S. Sam aria, learned Standing Counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondent-Agricultur al Department. The grievance of the petitioner is that he was allotted with a contract for cons tructions of Boritapa Thutikata Milan Bazar under Nalbari District Regulated Mar ket Committee. However, even in spite of partial completion of the contractual w ork, he has not been paid the running bill amounting to Rs.3,07,607/-. Learned counsel for the parties are agreeable if this writ petition is disposed of by issuing a directions to the respondent Department to settle the dispute in terms of the directions issued by this Court in 2008 4 GLT 1 : Tamsher Ali & Or s. Vs. State of Assam & Ors. Accordingly, I propose to dispose of this writ petition at the admission stage i tself by issuing a simple direction to the respondent authority to dispose of th e representations, dated 02.01.2010, submitted on behalf of the petitioner, and consider payment of the contractual dues to the petitioner, in terms of the dire ctions issued by this Court in Tamsher Ali(supra). This writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the above observations and dir ections.