IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10522 of 2010 2 26.4.2010 Chandu Sharma @ Chandu Sutihar S/o late Ramphal Sharma, R/o vill.-Hariraha, P.S. Karjain, Distt. Supaul ...... Petitioner VERSUS The State of Bihar ..... Opp.party ------- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Petitioner is husband of the complainant in a case under Section 498A and other sections of the IPC. Considering the entire facts and circumstances, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is willing to keep his wife, the complainant with dignity and honour. In that view of the matter, it is observed that if the petitioner surrenders within 10 weeks and satisfies the court below that he has compromised his differences with the complainant, in that event he shall be enlarged on bal on furnishing bail bond of Rs.7000/- to the satisfaction of SDJM, Birpur in connection with complaint case no.177(c)/08. Otherwise, 2 his prayer for bail shall be considered on its own merit. For a period of 10 weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner in the aforesaid case. (Shiva Kirti Singh,J.) sk