IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1746 of 2006 KUMAR CHANDRA VIKRAM Versus REENA SAHAY ----------- 2 12.8.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, the amount of Rs. 3,000/- fixed as monthly maintenance payable by the petitioner to the wife, opposite party, is neither illegal nor excessive. This Court cannot ignore the fact that the petitioner even as per his salary statement of the year, 2005 was having a gross salary of Rs. 9,923/- out of which he was contributing Rs. 6,500/- towards provident fund only. If that be the approach of savings of the petitioner for his own rainy days, he is also liable to save and secure present of the opposite party by paying a sum of Rs. 3,000/-. That being so, this Court does not find any error in the impugned order and accordingly, this civil revision application is hereby dismissed. The petitioner must pay the arrears and the current amount to the opposite party within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order failing which the Court below will be at liberty to take coercive 2 means including sending an order to the employer of the petitioner for deducting the amount and depositing the same in the bank account of the opposite party. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)