WP(C) 3564/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. A.M. Barbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.J. Ghosh, learned counsel for the official respondents. In terms of the order dated 14.09.2009 Mr. Ghosh has produced the relevant offic ial records. Having regard to the nature of the grievance expressed and the reli ef prayed for, this petition is being disposed of at the admission stage. Briefly stated the case of the petitioner is that while serving as Forest Guard in the Forest Department of the State he has been by the impugned order dated 04 .08.2009 transferred from Hailakandi Division to Karimganj Division. Prior there to, vide order dated 30.07.2009 he was transferred from Hailakandi Sadar Beat to Adorkona Beat Office. The petitioner has approached this Court contending inter alia that he being a Grade - IV employee could not have been transferred and th at the same is opposed to the letter No.ABP. 116/01/7 dated Dispur the 22nd May, 2002. The petitioner has pleaded that this transfer having regard to the lower r ung of service to which he belongs is highly prejudicial to him. The petitioner in his additional affidavit filed on 14.09.2009 has stated that without prejudic e to his rights and contentions he has meanwhile joined at the new place of pos ting in Karimganj. He has also brought on record the fact that on a representat ion submitted by one of such persons similarly transferred like him by the sai d order dated 04.08.2009, his transfer has been cancelled. The official records produced by the learned State Counsel has been perused. On a consideration thereof, and having regard to the limited scope of interference with the impugned order of transfer, this Court considers it expedient at this stage to close this proceeding by leaving the petitioner at liberty to submit an appropriate representation to be laid before the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Assam(Respondent No.2) against his transfer on grounds as available to him in law. In case, if he does so, the aforementioned authority would conside r the representation in accordance with law and dispose it on merits. No costs.