1 ca709.07 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 709 OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 23045 OF 2006 [Shaikh Ambir Sk Shahabuddin vs. Asadullakha Nasrullakha & Ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. M.M. Joshi, Advocate for applicant. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 9TH NOVEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant. Though respondents are served, none appears for them. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the applicant invited my attention to para-4 of the application and submitted that, though there is delay of 1314 days deserves to be condoned in the facts and 2 ca709.07 circumstances of this case. 3. It is true that, there is considerable delay in filing the second appeal. However, length of delay alone is not important. The explanation/sufficient cause disclosed in the application is required to be considered. 4. In the light of para-4 of the Civil Application for condonation of delay, I am satisfied that, delay deserves to be condoned. Delay stands condoned. 3. Civil Application for condonation of delay is allowed and stands disposed of. . Second Appeal to be placed for admission on 23-11-2011. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/NOV11