IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2010 / 29TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 26562 of 2010(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. VIJAYAKUMAR P.P., DRIVER PC D 8272, CBCID, H.H.W - III, KOZHIKODE. 2. ARAVINDAKSHAN M., DRIVER HC 6730, CBCID, H.H.W - III, KOZHIKODE. 3. UNNIKRISHNAN M.,DRIVER PC 4574, CBCID, H.H.W - III, KOZHIKODE. 4. VIJAYAKUMAR P., DRIVER HC 7542, CBCID, H.H.W - III, KOZHIKODE. 5. SAJITHKUMAR E.N., L.D.CLERK, CBCID, H.H.W - III, KOZHIKODE. 6. MADHAVAN.C., DRIVER PC 5289, CBCID, E.O.W - III, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN SRI.P.P.RAMACHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 10. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 10. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CBCID, H.H.W - III, KOZHIKODE - 673 001. 4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CBCID, E.O.W - III, KOZHIKODE - 673 001. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.26562 OF 2010(U) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of August, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners 1 to 4 and 6 are working in the driver category and the 5th petitioner is working as LD. clerk. Their claim is that their previous military service have not been reckoned for higher grade. It is stated that this claim has already been upheld in Exts.P4 and P5 judgments. Petitioners are also referring to Ext.P6 Government Order, where according to them, similar benefits have been extended to some of their colleagues. It is stated that the seeking identical benefits they have filed Exts.P7 and P8 representations before the respondents 3 and 4 and orders have not been passed on the said representations and therefore the writ petition is filed. 2. Having regard to the grievance of the petitioners that Exts.P7, P8 and similar representations filed by them are pending before respondents 3 and 4, I dispose of this writ Petition directing the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P7 and similar representations filed by petitioners 1 to 5. Forth respondent is also directed to consider Ext.P8 representation filed by the 5th petitioner. WPC.No. 26562/2010 :2 : Orders shall be passed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/