IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M. No. 757-CII of 2009 & CR No. 119 of 2009 Date of Decision: 23.9.2009 Babu Lal Choudhary ....Petitioner. Versus Gyarsi Lal and another ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. C.M. No. 757-CII of 2009 Allowed as prayed for. C.R. No. 119 of 2009 The petitioner has approached this Court by way of instant revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 24.10.2006 passed by the trial court whereby the application filed by him under Order 39 Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short “the Code”) was dismissed and also the order dated 27.10.2008 vide which the order of the trial court was upheld by the lower appellate court. The grievance of the petitioner is that the trial court vide the interim order dated 13.1.1996 restrained the defendants from improving the shape of the shop and the same has been violated by the respondents. C.R. No. 119 of 2009 -2- On appreciation of the evidence led by the parties, the trial court held that there is no evidence on record to corroborate the statements of the witnesses produced by the petitioner and that the petitioner had failed to prove that the respondents had violated the order dated 13.1.1996. The application filed by the petitioner was accordingly dismissed. The said order of the trial court was affirmed on appeal by the lower appellate court. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not point out any material to show that the order dated 13.1.1996 had been violated which may hold the respondents liable for action under Order 39 Rule 2A of the Code. In view of the above, there is no merit in the instant revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed. September 23, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE