1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 66 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 910 OF 2006 M/s. Carona Ltd. ... Petitioner Versus The Union of India ... Respondents Mr. C.U. Singh with Ms. Sona Singh i/by M/s. Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for Petitioner. Mr. Rafique M. i/by Paras Kuhad & Associates for R. No. 2. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2006 DATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2006 DATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . It is pointed out on behalf of the Review Applicant that subsequent to order of this court dated 14.3.2006, A.A.I.F.R. instead of hearing the issues only on the point of Rs.16 lacs. has heard the entire appeal itself in the month of June, 2006. But till date the judgment has not been pronounced. Considering the above, AAIFR to dispose of the pending appeal at any rate not latter than four weeks from today. Copy of this order be forwarded by the parties to AAIFR. . In the event, for whatever reasons, AAIFR is not in a position to dispose of the appeal, then to comply with the directions of this court as contained in order dated 14.3.2006 within two weeks from the copy of this order being produced before it. 2 (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)