IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 13105 of 2002 BETWEEN: R. Venkateswaramma W/o. late Sudarshan Reddy, Kothapet, Kurnool District. ... PETITIONER AND Kurnool Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Kurnool. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondent in interfering with peaceful possession of property situated in Sy.No.136 to an extent of Ac.3.59 cents in Kothapet, Kurnool Town and District as illegal, arbitrary and violating Art. 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent not to interfere with petitioner's possession to an extent of Ac.3.59 cents situated in Kothapet, Kurnool and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.SRINIVAS MANTHA Counsel for the Respondent: MR.A.SREEDHAR SC FOR MPL The Court made the following: ORDER: When the matter has been taken up for hearing on 01.08.2008, as none appeared, it was directed to be listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Today, when the matter is listed ‘For Dismissal’ and taken up for hearing neither the petitioner appears nor there is any representation on her behalf. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J August 8, 2008 DSK