«SLE s c ^ •[°i IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. ^ ^ / 2011^ PETITIONER Smt. Sadhana Chaurasia W/o Shri Rajesh Kumar Chaorasiya, Aged about 43 years, Occupation - Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Krishna NagarSupela Bhilai Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^1 SNo.«........^liA.22. ^..'(Ki^. Datod..^.:!!!:!?: Iw^ / State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer District Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTION OF INDIA ff' ,;Aa. u 2(I-HC-22 -:3S^; ^sr •^ll'illd'1), 9Ti1'y'is, ("iwi^y 31T^?T 'VRK .&2.i^.-. ^ f^ •^ '200 iWipif thtlich Iq^I' 311^1 ^iT R-ii.di sn^r sti^i'ti yf^fl SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava. J 10-01-2011 Shri Vipin Tiwari, counsel for th|e Shri Ajit Singh, Panei Lawyer f<tr Heard. Learned counsel appearing for|the pefiUoner submits that the petitioner is ent'rtted to beneflt of two advanc^ passed B.Ed examination before h^r appointment at her own cost. It is submitted that the issue involved irl 59. order dated 06-02-2009 passed in W. have been issued for consideration •*l<<!<-t''fl-l 'WRlf fl 'fe^t tfW5R ^i'3lfTOT3lT^[ petitioner. the State/respondents. increments on account of she having the present petition is no ionger res integra and the same has been finaliyl decided by the Hon'bieSupreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena vs. Sfafts ofM.P. & Ors.. 2009 fim MPJR 6; It is further submitted that this <;ourt has also taken a similar view in its >.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner further draws atfention of this Court to order dated 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal N4.124 of 2009, wherein relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in th4 case of Asha Saxena fsupra) and the order passed by this Court in anottler Writ Appeal No.87/2009, direcUons of the case for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21-09-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification ofthe facts ^leaded in the petttion. Learned counsel for the respon(lente submits that case of tt>e petitioner would aiso be considered on the same lines. In view ofthe statement made gbove, this petition is finalty dispcsed off with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the claim M--!:-: XI^RC-22 22) ^5? -41<Llld'll, 9fll<1'IS, (sldl'My 3TI^T •q3^ t^^<,)^5 . <(3/_1| "H^ '200 WI-R'ff Shliqi sn^'i^; Ss-u'ii s^n sti^i'"n ^riicT DeepK sii^i T^!iw«f?a -9. of the petitioner for grant of two 21-09-1974 issued by the State of facts pleaded in ttie petition within a ath/ance chl^41T1 ^HCII^ f^^l <p3T<^I< ^? sifSgii aii^i increments as per circular dated ^adhya Pradesh, after verification of ths period of elght weeks from today. Sd/'- Mamndra Mohan Shrivastava Judge \T!i-