IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4442 of 2010 Brij Bihari Pandey, son of Late Basudeo Pandey, resident of Turi Mohalla, Pandey Toal, P.S. Muffasil Arrah, District- Bhojpur. ………………………………………..Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Bihar State Electricity Board, through its Chairman, Bidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 3. The Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna. …….Respondents. ----------- 6. 12. 07. 2010. Mr. D. N. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna, as Respondent No. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that while the petitioner was terminated from service vide order dated 3. 12. 1994, the petitioner challenged the said termination order in the Labour Court. The Labour Court after hearing the matter set aside the dismissal/termination order and the petitioner was reinstated to his post and position by award passed on 27. 03. 2008. It is further submitted that inspite of the award, the petitioner did not receive any benefits. Learned counsel for the State submits that against that order, it was challenged by the Board by way of filing a writ application bearing C.W.J.C. No. 12147 of 2008 which is pending for admission. However, it is submitted that with regard to payment of G.P.F., the matter shall be enquired and if the payment has not been made, the admissible dues would be paid at the earliest. 2 In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the grievances as highlighted in the writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before Respondent No. 3. In case, such representation is filed along with relevant documents in support of his claim as also certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today, the grievances as raised in the representation of the petitioner be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled and admitted dues may also be paid without further delay with interest permissible under the rules. With the above observations/directions the writ application stands disposed of. m.p. ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)