C.W.P. No. 13558 of 2007 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 13558 of 2007 Date of decision : 25.3.2008. ... Satpal Singh ................ Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and others .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasbir Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Vivek Suri, Advocate for the petitioner Sh. Harish Rathee, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. ... Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) By filing this writ petition, petitioner has laid challenge to the order vide which he was compulsorily retired from service. However, at the time when notice of motion was issued on 30.8.2007, following contention of counsel for the petitioner was noticed by this Court:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is not challenging the order of his premature retirement. However, the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not releasing the pensionary C.W.P. No. 13558 of 2007 -2- benefits to him as he has been acquitted in a criminal case under Section 379, 411 IPC by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Kurukshetra vide judgment dated 5.6.2007(Annexure P-2).” In reply filed, it has been stated that all retiral benefits have been released in favour of the petitioner. However, this fact has been disputed by the petitioner. Be that as it may. Such like disputed facts cannot be decided at this stage. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to make a representation and raise his claim with regard to any amount due, which he feels has not been paid to him. If any such representation is made, the same shall be decided within two months from the date of its receipt. Disposed of. ( Jasbir Singh ) Judge ( K.C. Puri ) 25.3.2008. Judge chug