1 Cont.Pet.No.590_2010.sxw jsn FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 590 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.590 OF 1991 Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Vivek Salunkhe i/b. Mr. P.B. Shah, for the Petitioner. Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP for Respondent No.1 CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 21st December, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. On instructions, he states that Petitioner does not desire to press the Petition. 2. Perused the affidavit in reply filed by the Deputy Collector. The perusal of the reply filed by the Deputy Collector shows that there is a substantial compliance with the order of which the breach is complained of. Moreover, the learned counsel 2 Cont.Pet.No.590_2010.sxw appearing for the Petitioner states that the statutory appeal preferred by Petitioner under the provision of Maharashtra Land Revenue Court, 1966, has been allowed. 3. No case for initiating action under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is made out. The Contempt Petition is disposed of. [ A.S.OKA, J ]