IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (Criminal) No.26 of 2010 Naseem Ahmad ....Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ..Respondents Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. Dated: January 14, 2010 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. IA No.181 of 2010 (Urgency Application) Heard. Allowed. W.P.C.R.L. No.26 of 2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the First Information Report dated 30.12.2009 registered as Case Crime No.3218 of 2009, U/s 498-A, 323, 504 I.P.C. & 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act at Police Station Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal. He has also prayed that he may not be arrested in consequence to the aforesaid first information report. 2 After hearing learned counsel for the parties and after considering the material available on record, this Court finds that from the perusal of F.I.R. alleged offence is disclosed. There is clear cut allegation against the petitioner that he injured the respondent no.3 by hurting her on her head by rod. Since the offence is disclosed in the F.I.R. and specific allegations are made against the petitioner, this Court would not be justified in quashing the first information report. No valid ground is seen to entertain the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed summarily. (V.K. Bist, J.) Vacation Judge 14.1.2010 Arti