// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5963/2007 Ramlal S/o Shri Lallu Singh and Another Versus Civil Judge (J.D.), Kama, District Bharatpur and Others Date of Order ::: 03.07.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Sriram Yadav, Counsel for the petitioners #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Plaintiff-petitioners filed a suit for injunction in mandatory form in the trial court along-with an application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC. The trial court dismissed the application for temporary injunction. Being aggrieved with the same, the petitioners filed an appeal which was also dismissed by the first appellate court vide impugned order dated 27th April, 2007. The aforesaid both the orders have been challenged by the plaintiffs in the present writ petition. I have examined both the impugned orders passed by both the courts below in the light of submissions made on behalf of the petitioners // 2 // and I find that both the courts below have decided the essential ingredients for grant of temporary injunction i.e. prima-facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss against the plaintiff-petitioners. I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in the orders passed by both the courts below so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//