IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14401 of 2010 SANTOSH BHAGAT, SON OF KRITYANAND BHAGAT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 06.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 447, 384, 385, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that the accused persons forced the Complainant/Informant to act in a manner which was illegal. The submission is that the complaint is unduly delayed and for the same occurrence, two cases have been instituted against the petitioner, one by the father and other by the son. The petitioner is said to have filed an earlier complaint also against the Informant. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 7.1.2010 and apart from these two cases against the petitioner, there is no other case pending against him, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in Raniganj P.S. Case No. 128 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the father of the 2 petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The fact that there are only two cases pending against the petitioner including the present one will be verified by the Magistrate before releasing the petitioner on bail. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)