C^fcTE? 2— IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S).NO.S'S~3/ /2006 PETITIONER .^: ^^ .-•Cft-V •^>"..*>u RESPONDENT ^C^VEP-COPY c^.^-;^ FaizMohammadMansuri .. S/o Shri Sekh Subarati Age 41 years, Asstt.Teacher, Primary School Gumiya Block - Kartala, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 1. StateGovt.ofChhattisgarh ,^ Through Secretary Educationat Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt.-Raipur(C.G.) 2. Distric Education Officer /" Korba, Distt.-Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTLCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / L <. HI6H COURT OF CHt-IATTESeARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (s) No. 5529 of 2006 Petitioner ; Shushil Tiwari Versus Respondents ; State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & another Petitioner Respondents Petitionef' Respondents Petitioner Respondents W. P. (s} No. 5530 of 2006 Smt, Savita fcishyap Versus State ©ovt.of Chhattisgarh & another W. P. (s) No. 5531 of 2006 Faiz Mohommad Mansuri Versus State ©ovt.of Chhattisgarh & another W. P. (s) No. 5532 of 2006 Sdideo Kumar Singh Paikara Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & another Single Bench: Hon'ble fAr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, ©ovt.Advocate for the respondents/State. ORDER (10th October, 2006) Leamed counsel appeanng for the petitioners submits that while as Assistant Teachers/Upper Division Teachers, ths petitioners have gone on training to improve thsir qualifications on their own expenses and acquired B.Ed./B.T.I Examination Certificates. 2. The present writ petitions, being W.P.(s) Nos. 5529/2006, 5530/2006, 5531/2006 cuid 5532/2006 involve similar facts and common question of law. Thus, these petitions are being disposed of by this common ordsr. ^ (^) 3. According to leamed counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners are entitted to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Dur^ and another {2006 CEI) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwoait Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, Durg cnd another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachsrs, who had obtained B. Ed./B.TJ. Examination Certificate on his own expenses, are covered by the circular dated 24.12.98 issued by the State ©overnmentof Madhya Pradesh. 4. Leamed counsel for the petitioners further submits that the facts and question of law involved in the present cases are squarely covered by decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, burg and ouiother (Supra), to which learned counset appearing for the re^sondents fairly concedes and agrees with the averment made by leamed counse! appearing for the petitionsrs. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yadiwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B. Ed./B.TJ. Examination Certificates on their ovm expenses or not. No order as to costs. Bablu Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge