1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.Criminal Misc. Bail Application NO.3537/09 Umed Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order :: 21st July, 2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr.Manish dadhich, for the petitioner. Mr.Aneesh Bhurat,P.P. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material/case diary made available to me during the arguments of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations against the accused petitioner is that he wrongfully identified the witness of one registered sale deed whereas the other co accused person Malu Singh against whom similar allegation was there, has been granted bail by this court vide order dated 06.5.2009 in S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application NO. 2539/09; he further contended that the order granting bail to Malu Singh could not be placed on record before the learned Sessions Judge who rejected the bail application of the petitioner on the ground the bail application of Malu Singh had been rejected by the said court. A Copy of order 2 dated 06.5.2009 was referred during the course of arguments. After considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, examining the record and the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I think it fit and proper to allow this application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. Hence, it is directed that accused-petitioner namely Umed Singh S/o Deep Singh, be released on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.,in FIR No.81/08 Police Station Bichwal District Bikaner, registered under Sections 420,467,468,471 and 120 IPC provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) together with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. ns.