ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1503 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 1503 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 1503 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.Rameshwar N.Gite for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 12th November, 2008. : 12th November, 2008. : 12th November, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . The Petitioner-Plaintiff has moved this amendment application at the stage when matter is already fixed for evidence. The learned Trial Court, after considering the nature of the suit and the averments already made with regard to the Fragmentation of Consolidation of Holding Act, rejected the application by impugned order which according to me, in the facts and circumstances of the case, is correct. There is no case made out to interfere with the said interlocutory order under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2. The Petition is dismissed. ( 2 ) [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]