l»s 3 n 's y -ift. '^€v> ^ HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR DB: Hon'ble Shri N.K. Aaarwal & Hon'ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar. JJ. Medani Prasad Rathore (Dr.M.P. Rathore) S/o Late D.P. Rathore aged about 53 years, R/o Plot No.798, Niharika Road, Kosabari, Korba, Tahsil & District : Korba, Chhattisgarh. Presently posted as the Medical Officer, District Hospital, Korba, District:Korba, Vs. 1. State of Chhattisgarh Secretary, Department of Heatth S Family Welfare, Dau Kalyan Shgh Bhawan Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director, Health Services, Directorate of HeaSth Services, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. CoSlector, Collectorate, Korba, C.G. 4. Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Hospttal Superintendent, District Hospital, Korba, Tahsil & District: Korba, Chhattisgarh. 5. Dr. Omkar Singh Kanwar, Medteat officer, Primary Health Centre, Bade Gudara, Dist:Dantewada through: Director, Health Services, Directorate of Health Senrices, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Writ Appeal under Section 2 of the Chhattisaarh Hiah Court iAopeal to Division BenchS Act, 2006 Present: Shri Mjrza Kaiser Baeg, counsel for the appetlant. Shri Kishor Bhaduri, Additional Advocate General with S. Agrawal, Panel Lawyerforthe State/respondent No.1 ORAL ORDER (Passed on 21" November, 2011) ?-'y». Heard on admission. appellant has filed thls intra-court appeal against the impugned order dated 17^ October, a.(S)No.6184/2011. 1, 2. The appellant/petitioner filed writ petition for the following This Hon'ble Court may please be kind enough in setting aside the orders impugned transfer order dated 27.08.2011 & the retease order dated 29.09.2011. This Hon'ble Court may please be kind enough in directing the respondents to aliow the to work at his present place of 3. 3. The petitioner in substance was seeking quashing of the dated 27.08^011 whereby he was transferred from Any other relief & compensation and ttie cost of the petition may please ateo be granted to the District Hospitat, Korba to District Hospital, Narayanpur. 4. The learned Single Judge on thorough consideration of the submission advanced on behatf of pet'itioner did not find any infirmity in the order of the petitioner's tran^er and as such dismissed the writ petition vide impugned order dated 17.10.2011. 5. Shri Baeg, leamed counsel for the appellant submits that the order of transfer (Annexure P-4) is outcome of his complaint against respondent No.4-Civil Surgeon-cum- Chief Hospital Superintendent, District Hospital, Korba and the same is notsustainable in law. ~^7 ^•s % ^w "w^ '^•' ^ ''V& 1 II i ^-^ 4/ 6. On due consideration of the submisstons of learned counset Vijay for the parties, and the grounds takeR by appellant/petitioner in writ appeal and writ petition, we are satisfied that neither the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge nor the order of the petitioner's transfer dated 27.08.2011 suffere from any infirmity whatsoever. We, therefore, do not find any scope for interference in this intra-court appeal, the same liable to be dismissed and is dismissed summarily. Sd/- N.K.Agrawal 1 r=- Judge 1 / ( R Sd/- .N. Chandrakar Judge