IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13494 of 2011 Parmanand Singh, S/O Late Rameshwar Singh, R/O Vill.- Belsandi Tara, Panchayat- Belsandi Tara, P.S.- Bibhutipur, Distt.- Samastipur. . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Deputy Commissioner-Cum-Chief Executive Officer, Samastipur. 3. The Block Development Officer, Bibhutipur, Distt.- Samastipur. . . . . . Respondents. ----------- 2/ 25.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner is a P.D.S. dealer under Bibhutipur Block in the district of Samastipur. 3. The petitioner has stated in paragraph 5 of this writ application that he could not distribute 218.44 quintals of rice under Sampurna Gramin Rojgar Yojna and 38.22 quintals of rice under NFFW scheme because of non-issuance of sufficient permits. The petitioner submits that earlier vide letter no. 807 dated 05.05.2008 he was directed to refund the value of rice at BPL rate and now he is being directed to refund the value of at APL rate at Rs.13.70 per kg. 4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I observe that the impugned notice as contained in Memo no. 1901 dated 04.08.2011 would be treated as show-cause to which petitioner would file his representation. The authority concerned would dispose of the representation within a period of two months. In the mean time, no coercive steps would be taken subject to deposit of 15 % of undistributed rice in present form or the value of rice at the rate of 10 per kg. 5. This application stands disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)