4 \ f ! %04.05.2006 Present: Mr.Altaf Hussaln for the petitioner Ms.Iram Majid for Ms.Zubeda Begum for respondents 2, 3&4 +Cont.Case fCl No.773/9.nn3 * 1. Whereas petitioner claims to have set up a temporary structure before writ petition was filed and therefore would be entitled to the benefit of order passed on 25.7.05 directing status quo to be maintained, DBA asserts that petitioner re-surfaced and set up temporary structure after status quo orders were passed. 2. Under normal circumstances, one would have required the parties to lead evidence and resolve this issue, but for the reason I have today disposed of the writ petition holding the same to be not maintainable m view of the civil suit filed by the petitioner, I exercise my power not to conttaue with the contempt proceedings. 3. Needless to state, issue of contempt is between the court and the contemnor. 4. Notice of contempt is discharged. 5. Petition stands disposed of. May 4, 2006 PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. vg Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Signing Date:05.02.2024 14:43 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified