THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 2790 of 2010 Order: This revision is misconceived. The revision petitioners are the defendants in O.S.No. 164 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole and respondents in E.P.No. 81 of 2009 filed by the 1st respondent for execution of the decree dated 31-3-2009 for Rs. 2,27,721/- towards the principal and interest and Rs.6,611/- towards costs in the suit. The execution petition was filed under Or. XXI Rules 37 and 38 of CPC seeking arrest and committal to civil prison for willful default by the revision petitioners in satisfying the decretal liability. By the order impugned herein, the Court below clearly recorded and on a cogent and rational analysis of the material on record that the revision petitioners admitted in the cross-examination to having adequate means and assets to satisfy the decretal amount but yet have failed to do so and hence ordered the execution petition and directed arrest of the revision petitioners. No error in the application of law or exercise of discretion by the Court below is apparent, warranting revisional interference. This revision is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 9th July, 2010. GRR