THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.6556 OF 2005 ORDER: The petitioner-third party filed this revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 {“CPC” for brevity}, inter alia, assailing the order dated 09.11.2005 in E.A.No.150 of 2005 in E.P.No.51 of 2005 in O.S.No.295 of 1984 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Narsapur, West Godavari District, in rejecting the application filed under Order XXI Rules 97, 99, 101 and Sections 47 and 151 CPC seeking joint right in schedule properties along with several members in the family. The claim of the petitioner is that even though she is having such right and possession, she has not been impleaded. The respondents obtained preliminary decree and subsequently, they obtained final decree also. Since she is not the party, her right in possession will be affected and hence, she filed the present application seeking joint rights. On considering the submissions made and on perusal of the material available on record, the Court below rightly observed that the petitioner, who claims certain rights, vis-à-vis, not party to the suit for partition, necessarily has to seek the remedy of regular appeal against the preliminary decree or the final decree. In the absence of which, the petitioner cannot possibly invoke any right under Rule 97 or Rule 99 or Rule 101 or Order XXI CPC. The application, as framed and filed, is not maintainable in view of such comprehensive remedy available to the petitioner and with liberty to avail such remedy, I do not find any merits to interdict with the order passed by the Court below. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 17th June 2010 RRB