:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 567 OF 2008 K. Sundar Shetty ..Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner of Police Mumbai and ors. ..Respondents Mr. Prakash Shetty i/by Mr. P.K. Deshmukh for petitioner. Mrs. A.S. Pai, APP for State. Mr. Sudarshan Shinghrani for respondent nos.6 and 7. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & J. H. BHATIA,JJ. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & J. H. BHATIA,JJ. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & J. H. BHATIA,JJ. Dated: June 12, 2008. Dated: June 12, 2008. Dated: June 12, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner who has approached this court in the second round. In the earlier round, the petitioner had filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 2392 of 2007 which was disposed off on 18/2/2008. This court noted in the order passed on 18/2/2008 that F.I.R. was registered vide C.R. No.63 of 2008 on 17/2/2008 on the basis of the complaint filed by the petitioner and the investigation was in progress, including the recording of the statement of some of the witnesses. This court, therefore, noted :2: that no further order is required to be passed. 2. This petition in the second round states that in the FIR registered on 17/2/2008 on the basis of the complaint filed by the petitioner is not being investigated properly and it prays that additional charges of forgery be added for investigation. 3. In fact, the petitioner’s complaint arises from the management of Karnataka Yuvaka Mitra Mandali which is a Public Trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 and the petitioner could have approached the Charity Commissioner with an application to inquire into the alleged mismanagement of the said Trust on the basis of the so called resolution on which the petitioner’s signature was allegedly forged. The learned counsel submitted that the accused ought to have been arrested by now. The intentions of the petitioner are thus writ large and he wants the accused to be arrested. 4. Having noted that the FIR has been registered and the investigation is in progress, Criminal Writ :3: Petition No. 2392 of 2007 was disposed off and we do not find any reason to doubt that the investigation would not be taken to its logical conclusions. We are, therefore, not inclined to entertain this petition which was presented on or about 11/3/2008 hardly giving any further time to the police to complete the investigation and submit the report to the appropriate court. We have noted the undertaking of the learned APP that the investigation will be completed and the report will be submitted to the competent court as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a month, if the same has not yet been done. 5. Petition is disposed off accordingly. 6. Certified copy is expedited. (J.H. Bhatia, J.) (J.H. Bhatia, J.) (J.H. Bhatia, J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)