1 caf544-11 rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 544 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 317 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. ..... Mr. Vinay J. Hegde for the applicant. Mr. Vinod Mahadik for respondent No.1 – BMC. Mr. R. A. Thorat h/f. Mr. P. J. Thorat for respondent No.2. ..... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 29, 2011. P.C.: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant, the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent. The application is opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. Appeal has been admitted and, therefore, action of demolition on the basis of the notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal 2 caf544-11 Corporation Act, 1888 will have to be prevented subject to terms and conditions. 2. Hence, I pass the following order: :: O R D E R :: i. There will be interim relief in terms of prayer Clause (ii) of paragraph No.(6) of the application subject to condition that the applicant shall maintain status-quo in all respects in respect of the suit structure. (A.S.OKA, J.)