THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.3237 and 3246 of 2011 COMMON ORDER: Petitioners are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.57 of 2007 on the file of VIII Additional District Judge (FTC), Warangal. On their behalf, P.W.1 was examined and as the respondents/defendants have not cross- examined P.W.1, the Court below closed the evidence of P.W.1 and passed ex parte order on 09.06.2011, as such, the respondents filed I.A.Nos.434 and 435 of 2011 for reopening the case for cross- examination of P.W.1 and to set aside the ex parte order. The said applications were allowed by the Court below by separate orders, dated 18.07.2011. In these Civil Revision Petitions, it is contended by Sri T.S.Anand, learned counsel for the petitioners that number of opportunities were given to cross-examine P.W.1 and in spite of the same, the respondents have not availed the same. In view of the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of I.A.s filed before the Court below and as it is observed by the Court below in one of the impugned orders that the case was transferred from one Court to another Court, I am of the view that the Court below rightly allowed I.A.Nos.434 and 435 of 2011 by the impugned orders, which does not suffer from any illegality warranting interference by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. As it is stated that the suit is of 2007 and the evidence was already commenced, I deem it appropriate to direct the Court below to dispose of O.S.No.57 of 2007 as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of six (6) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. For the aforesaid reasons, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed with the direction as indicated above. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 10th AUGUST, 2011. kvni