WP(C) 4230/2008 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. B Rahman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. H K Sarma, learned standing counsel for the ASEB. 2. The petitioner was entrusted with the responsibility of submission of tr ansformers’ load survey report for single point power supply scheme for 3 differ ent areas under the Samaguri Electrical Sub-Division. But because of the delay i n furnishing of the report(s) by the petitioner and considering the urgency in t he matter, the impugned order dated 11.8.2008 (Annexure-B) was passed granting f urther 7 days time to the petitioner for submission of the report(s) pertaining to DTR Gatanga and DTR Owama. But in respect of the DTR Belaguri, to expedite th e matter, the work was entrusted to another person. 3. The ASEB Authorities have filed their affidavit where in Para 5 it is re flected as follows: That with regard to the statements made in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the writ petit ion, the deponent respectfully states that the petitioner was allowed by a lette r No.NED-II/T-66/2008/1589 dated 22.5.2008 to conduct load survey of the consume rs under 3 (three) numbers of DTR namely Gatanga 250 KVA DTR, Owana 100 KVA DTR and Beloguri 63 KV DTR under the supervision of the Sub-Divisional Engineer, Sam uguri Electrical Sub-Division and also to submit a report through Sub-Divisional Engineer, Samuguri to the office of the Nagaon Electrical Division-II, CAEDCL, Nagaon. The deponent further states that the writ petitioner has not intimated a ny information for delaying of submission of DTR survey report till 11.8.08 and the main aim and object of the scheme for single point SPPSS for rural area is t o give a better and reliable service to the consumer, reduction of losses and pr evention of pilferage and also proper revenue billing and collection. But, as th e writ petitioner has delayed in submission of the report before the office of t he respondent No.4, the earlier order of allotment date 22.5.2008 was modified b y an office order No.CAEDCL/NED-II/T-62/2008/2611(A) dated 11.8.2008 and only 2 (two) numbers of DTR i.e. Gatanga and Owana as mentioned above reallotted to the petitioner and the remaining DTR i.e. Beloguri was reallotted to Shri Nripen Sa rgiary who is a local unemployed of Beloguri area. The deponent further states t hat after issuance of the order dated 11.8.2008 at Annexure-B to the writ petiti on, the writ petitioner and Sri Nripen Sargiary have submitted their load survey report and other relevant document . 4. It appears that after the impugned order dated 11.8.2008, the petitioner has submitted the load survey report(s) in respect of DTR Gatanga and DTR Owama , whereas in respect of Belaguri DTR, a separate report has since been furnished by the other person. On the basis of the reports furnished, the ASEB is to nomi nate the agencies for collection of revenue from the consumers of the concerned area. 4. It is admitted by Mr. Sarma that the order granted to Nripen Sargiary in respect of Belaguri DTR has already been furnished to the counsel for the petit ioner and if the petitioner has any grievances on the same, he may re-agitate th e matter in an appropriate proceeding. 5. Mr. Rahman appearing for the petitioner makes submissions that he may be permitted to challenge the consequential decision of the ASEB Authorities. 6. In view of above and considering the reason for the impugned order dated 11.8.2008, I see no justification to entertain the writ petition which is found to be without any legal merit. Accordingly the same is dismissed without any co st.