1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 371 OF 2009 Manoj Bhanudas Nagrale .vs. State of Mah. & others ________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders. Registrars orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & P.B. VARALE, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 11, 2009. Heard Mrs. S.W. Deshpande, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.J. Jichkar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the grievance of the petitioner is in respect of inaction on the part of the respondent authorities to process the application filed by the petitioner dated 10.12.2008 for grant of parole leave on account of illness of his mother promptly. The learned A.P.P. has submitted that the respondents processed the application without any delay and as per the procedure applicable in this regard. It is contended that the application submitted by the petitioner was dated 10.12.2008 for grant of parole leave. Before taking decision on this application, the Competent Authority has to obtain police report as to whether the facts mentioned in the application are true and correct as well as whether the release of the petitioner is detrimental to the interests of the society. It is contended that the Competent Authority after following due procedure applicable in this regard has granted parole to the petitioner on 12.1.2009. It is, therefore, contended that the grievance of the petitioner is unfounded. 2 On the backdrop of the above referred facts, it appears that the delay, if any, was procedural and not deliberate or intentional. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for showing any indulgence. The Criminal Writ Petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE. J.