IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Appeal from Order No.307 of 2010 Smt. Anita W/o Arvind Kumar D/o Mirkapal R/o 97, BHEL, Ranipur, Haridwar District Haridwar ……Appellant Versus Arvind Kumar S/o Sri Atar Singh R/o House No.2, Gali No.4, Krashna Nagar Roorkee, Pargana & Tehsil Roorkee District Haridwar. .…Respondent Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. Sri Lalit Tewari, Advocate present for the appellant. Sri Pramod Tewari, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rajendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondent. CLMA No.7573 of 2010 Delay condonation application No. 7573 of 2010 is allowed. Delay in filing the appeal against the order dated 28.06.2010 passed by Additional Judge, Family Court, Roorkee in suit No.37 of 2009 is condoned. Heard. The appellant has challenged order dated 28.06.2010 passed by Additional Judge, Family Court, Roorkee, in suit No. 37 of 2009 instituted by respondent for decree of divorce. 2 By the Impugned order, the trial court has allowed the application moved by the respondent under order VI Rule 17 read with section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. We have gone through the order and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the appellant, we do not find any illegality in the order passed by the trial court in allowing the amendment application (paper No.23-B). Therefore, the appeal is dismissed summarily. (Nirmal Yadav, J.) (P.C. Pant, J.) JKJ 07.09.2010