CWP No.2414 of 2009 17.7.2009 Present: Mr. B.C. Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma and Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate Generals for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Sharwan Dogra, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Mr. B.C. Negi, Advocate has drawn the attention of the Court to para-4.5 at page 16 of proceedings of the Meeting of Heritage Committee, which reads as under:- “Smt. Trishla Sharma for residential accommodation on Khasra No.179/1 and 180 at Up Mohal Raj Bhawan, Chaura Maidan, Shimla. Proposal examined and recommended for onward transmission to the Government.” Thereafter the matter was again debated in the meeting of Heritage Advisory Committee and the following decision was taken:- “Plannning permission case of Smt. Trishla Sharma for residential accommodation on Kh. No.179/1 and 180 at Up-Mohal Raj Bhawan, Chaura Maidan. The proposal was submitted for construction of 2 storey residential building on open plot. The sub division of land into 8 plots was approved by the Town and Country Planning Department. Permissions in 7 plots were accorded prior to notification of heritage regulations. The Committee decided to inspect the site and take decision on merit in the case.” We are of the considered view that the interest of justice will suffice, if the respondents are directed to arrive at the decision in view of these two recommendations. The respondents are directed to take a decision within a period six weeks from today. In view of these directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. (Jagdish Bhalla), C. J. (Rajiv Sharma), J. July 17, 2009. (rkv)