IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 23360 of 2008 Between: N.Arjun Rao, S/o. Late N.Gurulingam, AP State Housing Corporation Ltd., Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The AP State Housing Corporation Ltd., 3-6-184, Street No.17, Urdu Galli, Himayat Nagar, Hyderabad- 29, Rep by its Managing Director. 2 The Board of Directors, AP State Housing Corporation Ltd., 3-6-184, Street No.17, Urdu Galli, Himayat Nagar, Hyderabad - 29, Rep by its Chariman. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus: i. declare the inaction on the part of the 2nd respondent in not considering petitioners appeals submitted on dt.12-12-2000, 1- 4-2004 and 30-4-2008 as illegal and arbitrary. Alternatively, declare the impugned proceeding No.A2(1)/7708/88 dt. 1-6-2000 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary and set/a/side the same ii. consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioenr into service duly granting all other consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.VASUDEVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.K.MOHAN RAMI REDDY The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 23360 of 2008 O R D E R: This writ petition is ﬁled being aggrieved by an order made in Proceedings No. A2(1)/7708/88 dated 1.6.2000 dated 1.6.2000, by the 1st respondent, whereunder the petitioner was dismissed from service after conducting a detailed enquiry into certain allegations made against him. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he has ﬁled an appeal against the impugned order dated 1.6.2000 on 12.12.2000 and further made representations on 1.4.2004 and 30.4.2008, there is no response from the 2nd respondent. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on merits, the 2nd respondent is directed to dispose of the appeal purported to have been ﬁled by the petitioner on 12.12.2000 being aggrieved by Proceedings No.A2(1)/7708/88 dated 1.6.2000, passed by the 1st respondent, if not already disposed of, as per law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. C.V. RAMULU, J. Date: 29-10-2008. MVB.