IN THF; HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ¥ ’ AT BILASPUR ( g W.P. /A.227 N0. /2010 $iN§LE ENm‘E I / ETITIQNER : Mukundlal Agrawal S/o Bhara'tlal lanntnff‘ ; Agrawal aged 'abou’t 50 .years R/o Shankar Nagar Ralpur Tahs1l & Dlstrlct Ralpur (CG) i VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1] Dr. Gulab Singh Khatri, S/o. B.Z. Khatri, 'Defendalitsi ‘ Veterinary Doctor, Mahasamund, At present R/o. Katora Talab, Raipur,’ District Raipur (C.G.) K f 2] I State of Chhattisgarh, through: Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) .. / v 3] Pramod Sethiya S/o Karniram R/o. 97, Hanuman Nagar Kahbadl Raipur, District Raipur (C G ) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I I \ P P 3.x C \02/\ ‘0' @ 1 I 1 § HIC‘H cOURT OF CHHATTISWXRH: AT BILA$PuR Sggw Bench Hun’bw shr: Just‘ce Praghant Kumar Misa‘hm Writ Petman {22?} NO 53 I 231G) Mukund! lAgrawa! Petiticner 1. i ; I r x . v x I > Versuas 1 Respgsftdefnta Dr. Gulw S‘mgh Khatri and athers. $hr: Mane; Parampe sounsel m! the petttmaer Ms Sangeeta Mishra Pane} Lam/ya far the State Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Qanstitution 9f india. i Writ Petman {2%) Nu 535i 26w Petmoner Mukund‘a Agrawal Versus Réspondents Smt Lata Khauri‘and athers. x u $hn Mano; Parampe counsei far the petitioner Ms Sangeeta M;shra Pane? Lawyer far the State Wtit Petition wider Articié 227 af the’Canstitutinn nf $ndia. J 1 ' Q R {YE R ($4.G2.2310) ThiS Qwer Sam“ gavem the dispasai 9§ W P {22?} No.534l201i} ana W P {22?} §\§G 535I2Q10 which anse wt Df ma common angma! ' order gassed by 15‘“ Cm! Jutige Class—2 Raipur . (2) Learneci tria‘ Court'wm‘e decidmg the defendant'3 application under Owe! 'r’ Ruie 11 cf Code cf CM! Pmceulure hm; directed iihe p‘aintEff ta yame the Suit separate!y for :eRaf as {g thezyemeval {7f wper t ’ I i I . structure and to pav Caurt §ee an the sand va¥ atmn as: acrordance With j»; ? ‘aw. § ¥ ‘> v l ? \ ' (3} {Qin $erusal 0f thev {mint {Annexure P/2) it appears $hat$he :V; ' ' pta¥nté€é ha; manned rehehn para 12$) tome ffegtthat $he de€endanta ‘ be femaved I mam the p03§essmn af the smt praperty at‘ter removal ef" ’ V ,. ,x’ the guperf skmcture and the Plamw be landed ever the vacant I passe3sioh thereéfm. I i (4) Under Serum 3 of the Suit valuatmn Act read amth Section 7W) 3f Qmrt Fees Act m a seat fer pusseeewe ef §and whegem separam rehef f0: demareahon e§ euper structure 13 prayed the sue is fequiredv r k a _ te be ,veluee eepamte‘y for poeseesmn and fer remove! of euper _; . structure The said iegal pasrtren has been sewed by the gudgment er M ? High Cnurt reperted 1n Laxmr Narayan are shw Narayan 1963' r ' MPLJ 238 {5) Sn v§ew at the abeve, the present petitien wed under Artieie 22? ; , of the‘censt'rtutien eff ledia, has rre eubstanee end it ie ascerdrngly dismissed at the admieeien stage. {5) A copy ef this Order be placed on the regard ef WP» {22?} N0535l2m 0 Sd//— i Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Bini f .