IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1312 of 2009 PANDEY VANKTESH PRASAD SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5 28-07-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. On perusal of notification of the Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar dated 31-7-2009 it transpires that all the directions of the writ court have been complied with. The petitioner has been treated to be in service for all practical purposes from the date when his junior was so appointed i.e, 14-12-1985. In accordance with the direction of the writ court his pay has also been fixed notionally by treating him to be in service from that date.The only grievance of the petitioner is that on account of completing required length of service his juniors have now been given benefit of A.C.P. whereas petitioner has not been given such benefit from the date his juniors were given those benefits. There is no direct adjudication on the said point but the authorities will keep in mind that petitioner cannot be disciminated vis- à-vis his juniors in any matter except that he has not been held entitled to receive actual salary for the period he did not work. With this clarification this contempt application is disposed of . If petitioner files any representation the same should be considered expeditiously in accordance with law. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) 2