IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3214 of 2005 Between: Sunku Siva Prasad Gupta & 2 others .... PETITIONERS And Jayavarapu Lakshminarayana ....RESPONDENT The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3214 OF 2005 ORDER: 1. This revision is by the judgment debtors, who have suffered a money decree. 2. The decree holder had filed E.P.No.89 of 2004 for execution of the money decree alleging that all the judgment debtors are brothers and they are jointly doing various businesses and that they are well off but they are avoiding to discharge the decree debt. The judgment debtors had filed E.A.No.1028 of 2004 before the executing court which was allowed by giving opportunity to them to contest the matter. During the enquiry made by the executing court, the affidavit evidence on behalf of decree holder as well as the judgment debtors was considered and the executing court on evidence came to the conclusion that the judgment debtors have sufficient means and as such they are liable to satisfy the decree failing which arrest for evading the decree was ordered. The said order was questioned by the judgment debtors in this revision by order dated 07.07.2005. 3. While admitting the C.R.P., this court granted stay of arrest subject to the petitioners/judgment debtors depositing one-fourth of the decreetal amount and costs. The said order is said to have been complied with. 4. It is also stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that as per his instructions, the parties have reportedly settled the matter. However, he is not in a position to get written instructions from the party. Even otherwise, the findings of the executing court show that all the judgment debtors/petitioners have sufficient means and as such I do not find any infirmity in the impugned order. In the circumstances, no ground is made out warranting inference. However, if the matter is not settled between the parties as represented, the petitioners are granted one month’s time from today to pay the balance amount if any already paid, failing which the executing court shall be free to execute the decree. 5. The civil revision petition therefore is dismissed subject to the above. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J August 03, 2010 KL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR C.R.P. No.3214 OF 2005 August 03, 2010 KL