IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No. 2806/2010 Randheer Vs State of Rajasthan 5.4.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Mahendra Shandilya - for the petitioner Mr GS Fauzdar – for complainant Mr Sanjeev Mehla – PP BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner deposited the amount for transformer with the company but the same was not installed. Some hot exchanges were taken place however FIR has been lodged with a delay of three hours. Hence, anticipatory bail may be granted to him. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After taking into consideration rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, but looking to the facts of this case, I allow this bail application under Section 438 CrPC. Therefore, the SHO/IO of the Police Station – Surajgarh, District - Jhunjhunu is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Randheer in FIR No.35/10 registered for offence under Section/s 332 and 353 IPC, he shall enlarge him on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i)He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii)He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)He shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (iv)He shall not commit same and similar offence during the period of bail. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma