IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-19342 of 2008 Date of Decision: December 09, 2008 Harpreet Singh Bajwa .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. G.P.S. Bal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Shilesh Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, assisted by Mr. L.M. Gulati, Advocate. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No.467 dated 2.12.2007 under Sections 363, 366, 34 IPC, Police Station, Civil Lines, Amritsar. In Para 12 of the petition, it has been brought out that Naveen Kaur (victim) daughter of the complainant had made a statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. It has further been stated that the victim had been going around with the petitioner and it was not a case of forcible abduction or use of force. It has further been stated that “In other words, the statement recorded under Section 164 Crl. Misc. No. M-19342 of 2008 [2] Cr.P.C. does not advance the case of the prosecution at all, hence in the present the complainant had lodged a false complaint in this regard having alleged something contrary to the proceedings at the ends of Naveen Kaur, the subject matter of the FIR”. Learned counsel for the respondent has referred to the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. in verbatim. It is brought out that Naveen Kaur has stated that she had been held by hands and pushed into car of the petitioner by the petitioner. Two persons sitting on the back seat had covered the mouth of the victim. The victim was threatened that she would be done to death if she raised hue and cry. They took the victim in the car around the city. When it became dark, she was taken to some house. In the house, there was a lady and two other persons who can be identified if they are brought before the victim. They tried to forcibly get her married to Harpreet Singh (petitioner). Naveen Kaur was threatened saying that if she said no, she would be raped by all the four persons. Considering the contents of the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., no ground for interference is made out. It would be for the Trial Court to consider the issue after recording evidence whether the offences as alleged are made out or not. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) December 09, 2008 JUDGE avin