IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2552 OF 2004 Shri. Ram Prem Goyel & ors. ... Petitioners Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Stamps, Mumbai & ors. ... Respondents Mr. Kumar Tolani with Mr. I.J. Nankani & Assocaiets for Petitioner. Ms. Geeta Shastri, A.G.P. for Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO,J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 P.C. 1. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The Petitioners by the present petition has challenged the demand notice dated 21.3.2002. On behalf of the Respondent, learned counsel points out that there seems to have been some procedural infirmity on behalf of the Respondent in as much as the Petitioners were not heard on the application of adjudication. It is further submitted that they will give hearing to the petitioners and after considering all aspects of the matter, including the judgement of the Division Bench of this court, will pass appropriate orders according to Law. In the light of that, the following order : (1) Respondents are directed not to act on the order dated 21.3.2002. (2) The Respondents are further directed after giving fresh opportunity to the petitioners and considering the contention as also judgments placed by the petitioners, to pass speaking order within the period of eight weeks from today. . Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. . Personal Secretary to issue authenticated copy of this order. (F.I. REBELLO,J.)