[ 3302 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY .THE THIRTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 25730 OF 2006 Between: Sri Manrupa Meadows Private Limited, rep.by its, Managing Director M.Ramesh Babu, S./o.Late M.Gandaiah, Aged about 47 yearc, Shop No.23, Reddy Hostel Shopping complex Tilak Road, Abids, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER The Special Grade Deputy Collector and Revenue, Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Attapur, Rajendranagar mandal, Ranga Reddy District The Mandal Revenue Officer, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District The State of A.P. rep. by its District Collector, Ranga Reddy district, Hyderabad. ( R3 is impleaded as per C.O. dt. 19-4-2011 in WPMP 36658 of 2009) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ and quash the appellate order of the first respondent in file No.D/2736/2006 dated 25..1 .1.2006 and also the resumption order passed by the second respondent in proceedings No.B/706/2006 dated 18.7.2006 and direct the respondents to forbear from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the land in Sy.Nos.103/431A, 103l43lAA and 103/50/AA totally admeasuring Ac.'1 1.18 guntas situated in Shamshabad village and mandal, Ranga Reddy District and grant such other relief as it deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. AND 1. 2. J. l.A. NO: '1 OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 32995 oF 2006) Petition under Section 1 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to grant stay of dispossession of the petitioner from the lands 1031431AA, and 103/50/AA totally admeasuring Ac 1 1..18 in Sy. Nos.103/43lA, guntas situated in shamshabadvillage and mandar, Ranga Reddy District pursuant to the orders of the resumption dared 18-7 .2006 in proceedings No. 8/706 12006 by the second respondent and the appellate order of the first respondent in file No.D/2736/2006 dated 25.1 1.2006 pending disposal of the writ petition and qrant such other relief as it deems fit in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the petitioner: Sri. Vedula Venkataramana (Not present) Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER / THE I-IONOUI(AItLE Sl(l IUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PLTI'I'IO N No.25730 of 2006 ORDEIT: This petition is corrrinl', for hearir.rg since 2006' On 11 12.7006 whcrr thr.: mtrtter \{as callecl, thcre was no representation, ancl thereforc' the mattt'r n'as tlircctecl to Lre listeti today under the caption " for Dismissal". Everr todav, when the matter is cailccl, thcre is llo represetltatiou' lt seems that the petitiorrer is not interestccl to p-rl-osecutc this case' 2. Accordingly, the Writ Irctitiorr is cl isrlissecl for non- prosecution/ default. No orcler as to L-osts. 3. Pending miscellaneous applicatior.rs, if any, shall stand closecl. SD/- P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTAILT REGISTRAR //rRUE cOPY/t <1p SECTION OFFICER 1. One CC to Sri. Vedula Venkataramana, IOPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue ,High Court fdr the Siate of Telangana. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies TJ GJP To, )al)X I HIGH COURT DATED: 3011112022 ORDER oi- l- \ WP.No.25730 of 2006 \ DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS NON. PROSEC UTION/DEFAU LT WIHTOUT COSTS. ,\- ./] \ ".s $ \i$Y. k\'.u " G