: 1 : IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.3518 OF 2006 PETITION NO.3518 OF 2006 PETITION NO.3518 OF 2006 Sou.Rohini Sampat Gaikwad & Anr. ...Petitioners V/s. Ramesh Sambhaji Pagare ...Respondent Mr.S.V. Sadavarte, Advocate, for the Petitioners. CORAM CORAM CORAM : R.M. SAVANT, J. : R.M. SAVANT, J. : R.M. SAVANT, J. DATE DATE DATE : March 7, 2007. : March 7, 2007. : March 7, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard Mr.S.B. Sadavarte, learned counsel for the petitioner. The petition takes exception to the order dated 09.01.2006 passed by the learned 4th Adhoc Addl. District Judge, Pune in Misc. Civil Appeal No.117 of 2004, by which order the Appeal filed by the petitioners came to be dismissed. The said order passed in Appeal confirms the order passed on Exhibit-5 which was an interim injunction application by the original Plaintiff i.e. the Respondent herein. Both the Trial Court as well as the Appellate Court on the basis of the material available before them came to a conclusion that the original Plaintiff i.e. the Respondent herein has made out a prima-facie case for grant of injunction. . I have perused the said orders. I do not find any illegality or infirmity committed by the Courts below for this Court to interfere in its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence the petition is summarily dismissed. : 2 : (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. SAVANT, J.) SAVANT, J.) SAVANT, J.)