^) L^ BEFORE THE M.P. STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BENCH RAIPUR O.A. N0. 12002 ^y/^t^. APPLICANT NON-APPLICANT Pushkar Lal Shrivastava Son ofShri B.D.L. Shrivastava Asstt. Teacher Primary School, Aamgaon Gram & Post Sahaspur Lohara Distt. Kawardha VERSUS 1. StateofChhattisgarh through the Secretary Department of School Education D.K.S. Bhavan Raipur(C.G.) 2. The Commissioner School Education Govt. of Chhattisgarh D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 3. District Education Officer Distt. Kawardha 4. Principal Govt. Middle School , Sahaspurlohara Distt. Kawardha ORIGINALAPPLICATION UNDERSECTION 190FTHEM.P. STATE ADMINISTRATIVETRIBUNALACT 1985 1. ParticularsoftheApplicant: ^Ail msr • ^ ^T HI6H COURT OF CHHATTES6ARH AT BIL.4SPUR W. P._(S)No,4846of1005 P<»*i+; r La1 Shrivas Mt gDor State of Chhattisqarh A othen Ti iff+; ihotri. Shri Manish Sharma, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri V.V.5. Moorthy, Dy. ;4dvocate fieneml with Smt. Anju Ahuja, &y. Govt. Advocate for the respondents/State. ORDEB /-i 4th ^r\f\^\ 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that while working as Assistant Teacher, the petitioner has gone on training to improve his quclifications on hls own expenses and acquired B. Ed. Examination Certificate on 9.9.1993 from Barkatullah University, Bhopal (Annexure A/2). 2., Accordtng to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitied to two advoice increments in view of the decision of this Cour* 'm the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corpor'ation, Durg and onother {2006 (JJ.) /APJR- /•-<* •Cto' 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kuma" Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Ourg and another (Supra), came to the t^n^l had obtasned B. Ed. ExaminatEon Certificate on his own expenses, are covered by the ci'-cular dated 24.12.98 (Annexure A/4) issued by the State Sovernment of AAadhya Pradesh. sssSi 3. Learnad counse! for the petitioner furtiier' submits tiiat the >f !aw involved in the pr-esent case i; f squarely covered by decision of tiils Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg an< another (Supru), to which iearned counsel appearing fo" the respondents fairly concecies and agrees witii fhs averment made by tearned counsel appear'mg for the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is albwed in terms of •the. order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaf Vs. AAunicipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification i+ie fact as to wj he Detition< xamination Certificate on his own exDenses or not. No order <ufcLcsh Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge