1 wp1786-10+ agk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1786 OF 2010 AND WRIT PETITION NO.1954 OF 2010 The Fashion House ...Petitioner Versus The Union of India & Others ..Respondents. Mr.Deven Parikh with Mr.Vivek Shetty i/by DSK Legal for the petitioner. Mr.R.V. Desai, Senior counsel with Mr.A.S. Rao for the respondents. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ. DATE : 29th April, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. By consent of both the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing. 2. In these two writ petitions, the petitioner has challenged the order-in-original dated 17-07-2008 as also the order in appeal dated 5-7-2010. By the said orders, it is held that the petitioner has not fulfilled the export obligation on the ground that no documents in respect thereof have been furnished by the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner states that the relevant documents were in fact furnished and they are ready and willing to 2 wp1786-10+ submit any other documents, as the respondents may deem fit. 3. In these circumstances, the adjudication order dated 17-07-2008 as also the order in appeal dated 5-7-2010 are quashed and set aside. The Adjudicating Authority is directed to pass a fresh order in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 4. Both the writ petitions are disposed off in above terms. No costs. (A.A. Sayed, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)