:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1798 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 1798 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 1798 OF 2008 Saeeda Bi Wd. Mohd. Hanif & Ors. ..Petitioners versus Chimane Sanmitra Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. & Ors. ..Respondents Ms. Shabana Shah with Mr. R. J. Rathod for the Petitioners. Mr. Pradeep Jadhav, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 - State. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. DATE : 20TH AUGUST, 2008. DATE : 20TH AUGUST, 2008. DATE : 20TH AUGUST, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard. 2. The petitioners have challenged the Order of the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, rejecting the revision filed by late husband of the petitioner No. 1 against the proceedings for recovery initiated by the respondent No.1 Co-operative Society. 3. According to the petitioners the property in :2: question cannot be proceeded against for recovery of debt against the respondent No. 2 Ramprakash Tilakdhari Pandey because the late husband of the petitioner No. 1 has purchased the property. This contention was raised in Revision also. The Revisional Court has observed vide paragraph 7 that the applicant failed to prove the ownership as per Agreement dated 4.12.1996 because it is not registered and stamp duty has also not been paid. The Revisional Court has further observed that the society has proved that according to the Mortgage Deed dated 27.3.1999, the Respondent No. 2 Ramprakash Tilakdhari Pandey is the owner of the gala in question and his wife and not the applicant. There is thus no merit in the petitioners contentions. Petition is dismissed. (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.)