IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 10523 of 2005 Between: P.V. Muralidhar Raju, S/o. P. Venkatram Raju, T.S. No. 6, Block L. Ward No. 3, D.No.4/6/B, Moola Mattam Thota, Papavinasanam Road,Tirumala, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 the Govt of A.P., rep. by its Prl.Secretary, Revenue ( Endts.III) Department, Secretariat Bldgs, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 the Sepcial Deputy Collector ( Land Acquistion) TTD. Tirupati, Chittoor Dsitrict. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to Issue, a writ order or direction more particualrly one in the natureof writ of Mandamus declaring the publication made by the respondent undr Sec. 6 of the land Acquistion aCt, 1894Dt. 7.4.2005 in respect of the premises bearing D.No. 4/6/B. situated in T.S. No.6, block No.L, Ward No.3, Moolamattam Thota, Papavinasanam Road,Tirumala as illegal, arbitrary and vioaltive of Art. 14.21 and 300 (A) of the cosntitution of India besides being the provisions constemplated under land Acquisition ACt and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioenr fromthe property bearing D.No.4/6/B, Situated in T.S.No.6 Block NO.L, Ward No.3, Moolamattam Thota, Papavinasanam Road,Tirumala and to pass necessary order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.C.KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: As none were present on 18-04-2008, the matter is directed to be listed for dismissal. When the matter is taken up today, none for the petitioner. No representation either. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 29-04-2008 pvks