V mOH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH A l' BILASPUR %7RrrpETmoN,/s) No. 1707 of2009 PETITIONER : Bharat Kumar Bai^i S/o Late Stei B.R.Bai-gali, aged about 50 yeai-s, Lab Technician, O/o Deputy Director, Vetwinflry Services, Distt Duitewada (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, throu^i fte Seeretary, Depaitment of VeterinaryServices, Mantralaya at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. The Director, Directorate of Veterinary Services Near Ourutej Bahadur Paik, G.E. Road,Raipur(C.G.) 3. Deputy Director, Veterinary Sendces, Ainbikapur, Disti-ict Sarguja (C.G.) 4. Jomt Director, Accounts, Treasuiy and Paisioti, Bilaspur, District BUaspur (C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF DSIDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satfsh K. AzaMiotri. A Preseut: Shri Rakesli Anthony, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General vrith Ms. Sunita Jain, Paael Lawyer fortiie State/respoiidents. ORALORDER (Passed on 31st day of March,20(») 1. Leamed counsel appearing for Ae petitioner, <m instructiwis, subituts that the petitioner does not want to contest the petitini on merits, however, prays that the respondent authorities may kindly be directed to consider and decide his pending represaitation (Amiexure P/6) as expeditiously as possible. 2. Shri Thakur, leamed Deputy Advocate Oeneral appearing with Ms. Jain, leamed Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents subnrits that that ifthe representatimi dated 09.05.2008 (Amiexure P/6) is pending consideration, Ihe same shall be considered and decided by the respondent-authorities in aecordance with law, on its own merits, within a period ofei^it weeks fi'om today. 3. "ta view ofthe foregoing, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the petitiwi stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit