{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.827 OF 2010 in CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.66 OF 2010 Mrs.Padminbai Dashrath Zanzane APPLICANT VERSUS Tuljiram Haribhau Zanzane & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. M.A.Tandale, Advocate for applicant Mr. N.B.Patil, APP for respondent No.4 State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 4th March 2010 PER COURT: 1. By this application, the applicant has prayed for condonation of delay of 106 days and hence no necessity to issue notice to respondents No.1 to 3. Issue notice to respondent No.4. Learned APP accepts the notice. 2. Heard. By this application the applicant has prayed to condone the delay of 106 days caused in preferring the revision application challenging the judgment and order dated 12.08.2009 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Beed in Special (Explo) Case {2} No.02/2009, whereby the original accused are acquitted. For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the delay is not deliberate or intentional and hence the same needs to be condoned. In the result, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “A” and “B” and stands disposed of. The delay is condoned. Applicant to take circulation after registration of the criminal revision application. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln827-10