hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO. 6105 OF 2009 Shri. Krishna Hanumant More ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.Rupesh Nalavade for the Petitioner. Mr. V.S. Masurkar, Government Pleader with Mr.S.N. Patil, A.G.P.for R. Nos. 1, 2 and 5. Mr. Nitin B. Patil i/by Mr. Uday Warunjikar for R. Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 09, 2009 P.C. The Petitioner approached this court against the order of his suspension of the year 2007. Ordinarily this court would not interfere in the order of suspension. In such cases, it is for the respondent to review whether to continue suspension or not. On behalf of the respondent state, the learned counsel submits, on instructions, that they have been informed that in fact the inquiry is over and report has been submitted. We do not propose to go into that controversy, suffice it to say that the Disciplinary Authority within one month from today will go into the issue of continuation of suspension and pass appropriate orders according to law. With the above observations, Petition disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)