IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10290 of 2007 KUMARI MEENA BHARTI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2/ 6/5/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner questions the appointment of respondent No.9 on the post of Angan Bari Sevika with a claim that she was better suited for the post. Learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage confines his submission for an appropriate direction to the respondents to dispose the representation of the petitioner in this regard at annexure- 5. The writ application is thus disposed with directions to respondent No.3 to decide and dispose off the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The respondent shall be required to hear all concerned before passing appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the matter which shall remain within the discretion of the respondents in its entirety. The application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )