1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.565 OF 2010 Shreekumar Pillai : Petitioner (Orig.Complainant) V/s. Navnitlal Purshottamdas Parekh & Ors. : Respondents .... Ms R. Y. Siddiqui for the petitioner. Mr.A.S.Shitole, Addl. Public Prosecutor for respondent no.7. ... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : MARCH 05, 2010. P.C.: By way of the present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 17.12.2009 by which the learned Magistrate has directed the complainant to lead evidence under section 200 Cr.P.C. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the basis of the complaint of the petitioner is forgery, the learned Magistrate ought to have directed an investigation under section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. by the police machinery. The learned Magistrate has given reasons as to why an order under section 156(3) is not necessary and as to why the petitioner is directed to lead evidenced. No perversity is found in the reasons 2 recorded by the learned Magistrate. 3. Criminal Writ Petition is rejected. B. R. GAVAI, J.