'v' ^•-K^ •.'a INTHEHlGHCX>ltt ( aUDICao-tIREJO-BllJ RURfG.G.11 "^^W6::;:-'..:l.:-;':: &A.flai^~ faos rf&. ARPELI.ANTS .j^aintiffs^. ^, \A^ ry'^'./-''' '^e^r i(>J<i9/"t1t^ v^&^.; ^^ ^ '^^ Ramdas SAi- Hira Lal aged aboyt SOyears, Nirasha Bai W/o- Ramdas aged about 46 years, Both resident of village Dodki - Bpdritola, P.S.- Kelhari Tahsil- Manendragarh, District- Korea ;(C.G.) •' ,1'; :.','•':,. ^ Hiroundia Bai | W/o- Molairam Gondagedabout3&years, Sukhsen S/o- unknown aged about6years(minoi^ S Through hernaturalguardian Both resident of village- Dodki, P.S. Kelhari, Tahsil Manendragarh, DistrictKorea (C.G.} ; MEMOiOR SEGOND APPE^I. UNDCR^SECTION ItOO O^^^t^^ CCI©E@FCIVILPROeEDURE. RESPONBENTS ifendents VERSUS L 2. XI-HC-78 3^'"i||t|lciq, ®T)1«<IS,fst<ni*fy Um^llsh*4icb •"^•^•^•^•^^•-^r 200<$ '^^^ft "^ 3:n^?T<ra^? ('^fga^sT) \^ sn^TEfiTf^IRi traT3TI^TsbH ~< ^ 5TdTW:flf?(T3n^T 7. None for the appellant. Evsfcn in the second cali noneappeared for the appellant. This is the second appeal matter is listed on default. The su|bstantial questions of iaw have not been <t>i'iifa41-f tiitictT^te^'cRiwK ^aTf^TsiT^r under Section 100 of the C.P.C. The mentioned in the memo of appeal.l Since neither the appellaitit nor his counsel appeared when the case is called, the appeal iadismi^sed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Shirendra Mishra Judge