IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO : 5232 of 1995 Between: Gummadaveli Ramulu S/o.Yadagiri R/o.Pilllamurthy (V) presently residing at Suryapet Nalgonda Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Suryapet Mandal Suryapet Nalgonda Dist 2 The Dist Collector Nalgonda. 3 The Managing Director A.P. Tourism Development Corporation Hyderabad. 4 The Commissioner of Land Revenue A.P Nampally Hyderabad. 5 A.P.Bhoodan Yagna Board Rep. by its Chairman Gandhi Bhavan Hyderabad. 6 M/s. Spencers Hotels and Resorts Ltd., rep. by its Managing Director M/s.Naga Raju Panjagutta Hyderabad. (R.6 was impleaded as per court order dt 20/2/97 Wp.No.3801/97) .... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to issue patta in the name of the petitioner herein as per the certificate of Respondent No.5 dt.31-5-1988, 0.20 Guntas village Pillalamarri of S.No.504 to the petitioner and record the same in the revenue records and quash the proceedings of Respondent No.1 dt.28-6-1993 and rejecting the application of petitioner in Memo.dt.22-2-1995 in No.A/875/95 of Respondent No.1 or any other proceedings relating to Survey.No.504,of Pillamarri village, Suryapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. K.PATTABHIRAMARAO (not present) Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.6: Mr R.Dayanand Reddy The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Initially on 02-09-2004 when the case was called the learned counsel for the petitioner absent and there was no representation on his behalf. Hence, the mater was directed to be posted for dismissal. Even today, when the case is called the learned counsel for the petitioner absent and there is no representation on his behalf. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. ______________________ (T.MEENA KUMARI,J) 9th September, 2004. Kvrm/Tsy To 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Suryapet Mandal Suryapet Nalgonda Dist 2 The Dist Collector, Nalgonda. 3 The Managing Director A.P. Tourism Development Corporation Hyderabad. 4 The Commissioner of Land Revenue A.P Nampally Hyderabad. 5 The Chairman, A.P.Bhoodan Yagna Board, Gandhi Bhavan Hyderabad. 6 Two CCs for the GP for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (O.U.T.) 7 Two CD Copies.