-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1038 OF 2005 Mr.Niyaz Ahemad & ors. .. .. Petitioners v/s. The State of Mah. & ors. .. .. Respondents Mr.A.M.Saraogi for petitioners. Mr.A. Sayed for res.No.1. Ms.A.K.Savla for res.No.2. Mr.Rajiv Narula for res.No.5. ---- CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & S.C.DHARMADHKARI, JJ. S.C.DHARMADHKARI, JJ. S.C.DHARMADHKARI, JJ. DATE : 15TH APRIL 2005 DATE : 15TH APRIL 2005 DATE : 15TH APRIL 2005 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioners are making a grievance with respect to a development scheme. The petitioners are having some commercial premises. Mr.Narula appearing for respondent No.5 points out that the petitioners are being accommodated. Even an occupation certificate is also issued. The grievance is with respect to some use of the foot-path. That is also answered by SRA that nothing of kind is happening. We cannot -2- interfere in such matters. Petition is rejected. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)