IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23024 of 2010 RAJDEO MAHTO S/O LATE BHARAT MAHTO R/O VILLAGE-MEHSAUL, TOLE LAKSHMINAGAR, P.S.- SITAMARHI, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI ………….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI KRISHNA GOPAL S/O HARI NARAIN PRASAD, R/O- MOHALLA- MAHABIR ASTHAN PURANI BAZAR, WARD NO. 6, P.S.- SITAMARHI, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI …………..Opposite Parties ----------- 2. 11.03.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved with the order dated 14.7.2009 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-III, Sitamarhi in Cr. Rev. No. 43/09/04/09, by which the order dated 25.2.2009 passed by Judicial Magistrate 2nd Class, Sitamarhi in Complaint Case No. C1/203/09 has been affirmed by which the Magistrate had dismissed the complaint petition. On going through the complaint petition even I am of the opinion that no criminal offence is made out against accused persons and, therefore, the Magistrate was right in dismissing the complaint. In view of such the application is dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)