IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2248 of 2011 Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Sahni Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 6 22-07-2011 A joint compromise petition is filed on behalf of the parties and apart from that, Photostat copy of draft of compromise petition of Matrimonial Case No. 59 of 2008 has also been filed. Both the parties alongwith their counsels, appear and submit that they would file compromise petition in present case as well as in Matrimonial Case No. 59 of 2008 soon after receiving the money and passing of the present order. It would appear from order dated 29.03.2011, that parties have resolved their dispute amicably with happy note of compromise and in compliance of the aforesaid order, Rs 30,000/- was paid to the father of the complainant by the petitioner but on account of some apprehension in the mind of the complainant, she did not file compromise petition before the learned court below and again, the aforesaid matter was raised before this court. Again, parties were persuaded by this court with assistance of learned counsels and the above-said persuasion brought result and accordingly, rest amount i.e. Rs 35,000/- is paid to the complainant by the petitioner in presence of father of the complainant as well as other persons. The parties assured before this court that they would 2 file compromise petition in both the cases on the very next date of the case. This court expects from the parties that they would do the needful in compliance of their promises. The concerned courts should try to dispose of cases pending in their respective courts as early as possible, so that both the parties may lead their separate life peacefully and happily without having any further apprehension in their minds. In the aforesaid circumstances, the order dated 08.03.2011 by which the petitioner had been granted provisional bail is, hereby, confirmed. Accordingly, this Cr. Misc. Case stands disposed of. Let this order be communicated to the court of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, West, Muzaffarpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 1622 C of 2007 as well as to the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur in Matrimonial Case No. 59 of 2008 through fax at the cost of the parties. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)