IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A. N0. SO /2011 '^B^.^/*f?^ ^s';s.^^~?Ji; ^TS^^ l^^'£SS**?i APPELLANT : 3 ^^:s s^ ^w^^y^^r^ T^!S3^T^} ,.****'*7v <° \ >o^d-""^ r-' M/s Rajat' Enterprises Partner Company through Partnership Shri Mahavir Kumar Golchha S/o Late Kanwar lal Ji Golchha, R/o 'Naveeri Bajar Raipur, Tah 8s Distt RaipurfC.G.) RESPONDENTS: VERSUS 1) Khageswar S/o Shri Dashrath R/o Gohrapadar, Police Station Deobhog, Tahsil Gariyaband, District Raipur (C.G.). 2) Murli Ram. S/o Domuram Rawat, Occupation Truck Driver, R/o Village and Post Gohrapadar, Police Station Deobhog, Tahsil Gariyaband, District Raipur (C.GJ • 3) The United Indialnsurance Company Limited, City Branch Office No.2, Raipur Through : Divisional Manager Divisional Office, Kutcheri Chowk, Jail Road, Raipur (C.G.) MEMO OF APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43^RULE !,OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE ^ Being aggrieved by the order dated 27/11/2010 passed by the court of 14thAdditional Metor Accident Claims Tribunal iWs Rajat Enterprises naftiicl L>ufiipialiy Versus Khageswar and others. APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE .'M< Present : None for the appeltant. (Passed on 1K day of March, 2011) The matter is caiied twice. On both occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behaif of the appeiiant. The appeliant msy not be interested in prosecuting the matter. 2. In viev; of the above, the appeai is dismissed for want of scutlon. Sd'- N.K. Agarwal JiidBe Kw ^