IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2008 / 13TH JYAISHTA 1930 WA.No. 995 of 2008() -------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.13943/2008 Dated 02/05/2008 .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER: ---------------------- MUHAMMED KUNHI, MANAGER, KHADI SOUBHAGYA III, KANNUR, RESIDING AT SYDARAKATHU HOUSE, THAYYIL POST, MARAKARKANDI, KANNUR-3. BY ADV. SRI.RAJAN P.KALIYATH RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE KERALA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR, PAYYANNUR KHADI CENTRE, PAYYANNUR. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,JJ. ------------------------------- W.A.NO.995 OF 2008 -------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT Raman, J. This writ appeal is filed against the interim order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C).No.13943/2008. The petitioner in the said writ petition was appointed as an Agent by the Khadi Board. Agency was terminated. Dispute pertaining to the termination is pending consideration in the writ petition. In the meantime, attempt was made to remove the goods entrusted with the petitioner by the Khadi Board. The learned Single Judge passed an interim direction that in case the goods are removed from the petitioner's shop, it shall be done only after preparing proper inventory in the presence of the petitioner or authorised representative and inventory shall be counter signed by the petitioner or such authorised representative. As a matter of fact, this is an order protecting the interest of the petitioner, the appellant herein. 2. When the matter came up for consideration, it was submitted -2- W.A.No.995/2008 by the learned counsel for the Khadi Board that inventory has already been prepared and the goods are taken over by the Khadi Board and in the circumstances, the appeal has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. P.R.RAMAN, Judge. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, Judge. kcv.