IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15884 of 2008 SURENDRA PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14-05-2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and also learned APP on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case u/ss 395, 397 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is neither named in the FIR nor any recovery has been made from his possession. He has also not been put in T.I. Parade. He submitted that alleged confessional statement of the petitioner before the police has no evidentiary value because on the basis of that statement nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel pointed out that petitioner is rotting in custody since 27.3.06 without there being any evidence against him. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, I, Barh, in S. T. No.1383/07. BKS/ (M. Saran, J.)