BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Ninth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.11508 of 2011 1 BOOMINATHAN 2 POTTU AMMAL 3 KALIMUTHU ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2,6 & 7 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALLATHUR POLICE STATION SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT CR.NO.203/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.R.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.203 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are arrayed as A2, A6 and A7 in Crime No.203 of 2011. He further submitted that already A1 and A3 to A5 were enlarged on bail and they have also deposited the value of the damage caused by them and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor fairly conceded that a case has been registered against seven persons on 21.08.2011 and the value of the damaged property is worth about Rs.1 Lakh and while, A1 and A3 to A5 were enlarged on bail, they have deposited the amount and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that while, A1 and A3 to A5 were enlarged on bail, they have deposited the amount and even though the petitioners were not arrested neither they interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi and on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. Sd/- 09/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KARAIKUDI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTATE SIVAGANGAI 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALLATHUR POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. A.R.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate SR.No.30957 ssk/13.09.2011 /6c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11508 of 2011 Date :09/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/