IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY, TWO THOUSAND TEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3526 of 2010 Between: Sri Vanka Pratap … Petitioner And State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: None Counsel for respondents 1&2: AGP for Home This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3526 of 2010 ORDER:- In this writ petition, the only grievance of the petitioner is that investigation into crime No.92 of 2007 registered against him at the instance of respondent No.3 has not been completed. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that investigation has not been closed, as respondent No.3, who is complainant, has not submitted evidence in support of the allegations made therein. In my considered opinion, if the complainant does not cooperate with the police, they cannot keep the investigation pending infinitely and they should take steps to see that appropriate charge sheet/final report is filed on the material available during the investigation. The writ petition is therefore disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 to complete the investigation and file appropriate charge sheet/final report before the jurisdictional Magistrate within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.4618 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 05.03.2010 ES