:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5626 OF 2004 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.950 OF 2004 Goving Babu Karalekar .. Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.J.B.Kocheta for applicant. Smt.V.R.Bhonsale, APP for the State. CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED : 18th January, 2005 P.C. Heard. 2. It cannot be said that there is no evidence establishing the complicity of the accused to the crime. Besides direct evidence of PW2 and PW5, there is circumstantial evidence against the accused-applicant. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant was on bail during the trial. The situation has surely changed thereafter as in the course of trial, the evidence has come that connects the accused with the crime. :2: 4. No case for bail is made out. Criminal application is rejected. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA, J.) LODHA, J.) LODHA, J.) (R.S. (R.S. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) MOHITE, J.) MOHITE, J.)