THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1542 OF 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition, under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is directed against the order, dated 25.02.2011, in E.P.No.427 of 2010 in O.S.No.877 of 2009, on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool, whereunder and whereby, the Execution Petition filed by the respondent/decree holder against the petitioners/judgment debtor Nos.1 and 2 to sell the E.P. schedule property, which was attached before judgment in the order to realize the decretal debt as provided under Order XXI Rules 66 and 68 C.P.C., was allowed with respect to the share of petitioner No.2/judgment debtor No.2 in the E.P. schedule property. 2. Heard. 3. Petitioners herein/judgment debtor Nos.1 and 2 are brothers. The respondent/decree holder obtained a money decree against the petitioners. The respondent filed the Execution Petition, in order to realize the decretal amount, by way of sale of the Execution Petition schedule property, which was allowed vide the impugned order. Since petitioner No.1 died prior to the filing of the Execution Petition, the respondent did not press the Execution Petition against petitioner No.1 and accordingly, the Execution Petition against petitioner No.1 was dismissed as not pressed. 4. A perusal of the impugned order shows that petitioner No.2/judgment debtor No.2 pleaded to grant fifteen installments to pay the decretal amount. But, that was not accepted by the executing Court on the ground that petitioner No.2 did not take steps praying the Court to grant installments after passing the decree. The order under challenge does not suffer from any infirmities so as to call for interference by this Court. The revision petition is devoid of merit and is liable to be dismissed. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, the further proceedings in the E.P. are kept under abeyance for a period of four months from today to enable petitioner No.2/judgment debtor No.2 to pay the decretal amount. For any reason, if petitioner No.2 fails to pay the decretal amount, then the executing Court can proceed further in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C. BHANU, J August 02, 2011 MD IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1542 OF 2011 Between: S. Abdul Sattar (died) and another .....PETITIONERS AND G. Ramaiah ....RESPONDENT The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1542 OF 2011 August 02, 2011 MD