IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7119 of 2008 GUL MOHAMMAD & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 2/7/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners was rejected earlier in Cr. Misc. No. 45433 of 2007 under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. In Paragraph-42 of the case diary was noticed that the petitioners were found not to have distributed the foodgrain given to them for distribution under Antodya Scheme. Renewing the prayer for anticipatory bail, learned counsel submits that the case diary contains no materials to link the allegedly seized grains from the truck to the petitioners. He refers to paragraph-43 of the case diary to submit that the grains seized, in fact, did not belong to them as the police on verification of stocks and stock registers as well as sale registers, has found no discrepancy. This was stated not to have been placed appropriately on the last occasion. The fresh submission from the case diary is not controverted by the counsel for the State. The provisional bail granted to the petitioners on 16.4.2008 in Pothia P.S. Case No. 70/2007 pending before C.J.M. Kishanganj is hereby confirmed. S.Ali (Navin Sinha, J.)