1 wp-8631-10.sxw dgm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8631 OF 2010 Krishna Maruti Shelar and ors. .... Petitioners vs State of Maharashtra and ors. .... Respondents Mr. S.P. Thorat for the petitioners. Mr. V.S. Gokhale, AGP for respondents no.1.. CORAM: D. K. DESHMUKH & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : October 18, 2011 P.C.: The learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioners press for relief in terms of prayer (a). Prayer (a) of the Petition reads as under: “(a) That the record and proceeding in respect of land bearing no. adms. 81R from Survey No.31 at Village Mhasve may be called for from the office of Special Land Acquisition Officer and it may be declared that the land which is distributed in favour of Respondent no.4 and 5 is contrary to the order/mandate passed by the Ld. Civil Judge Senior Division in Regular Civil Suit No.246/89.” 2 wp-8631-10.sxw 2 Thus, according to the Petitioners, allotment of land made in favour of Respondents 4 and 5 is contrary to an order passed by a Civil Judge, S.D in Regular Civil Suit No.246/1989. If that is so, the remedy of the Petitioners would lie for enforcing that order. A writ petition for enforcement of an order passed by the Civil Judge, S.D is certainly not maintainable. The Petition is rejected. No costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (D. K. DESHMUKH,J.)