IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 25TH JANUARY 2011 / 5TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1342 of 2011(P) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- THANKAMMA, AGED 60 YEARS, W/O. LATE RAMAN RAMAN, THADATHIL HOUSE, KUDAMURUTTI P.O., RANNI, PERUNAD, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN- 689 711. BY ADV. SRI.C.N.SAMEER RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA, 689 645. 2. PRABHAKARAN, S/O.VASU, CHIRAPPARAMBIL, ATHIKKAYAM VILLAGE, PERUNAD, KUDAMURUTTY, PIN-689 711. 3. PRABHAKARAN, S/O.VASU, KOLINCHIPATHAYIL, PERUNAD, KUDAMURUTTY, PIN-689 711. 4. THOMAS, S/O.ABRAHAM, VELLAMKUZHI, PERUNAD, KUDAMURUTTY, PIN-689 711. 5. KUNJUMOL JAMES @ ANNAMMA, AGED 50 YEARS, POONIYIL, PERUNAD, KUDAMURUTTY, PIN-689 711. 6. ANNAMMA, PERUMPUZHAYIL, PERUNAD, KUDAMURUTTY, PIN-689 711. 7. VARGHESE, CHARIVUPARAYIDATHIL, PERUNAD, KUDAMURUTTY, PIN-689 711. 8. ANANDAN, KOLINCHIPATHAYIL, PERUNAD, KUDAMURUTTY, PIN-689 711. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.P.N. SANTHOSH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/01/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P (C) No.1342 of 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 25th January, 2011 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, she made Ext.P3 application to the 1st respondent under the provisions of the Restriction on Transfer by and Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act 1999. It is stated that the application is pending and the 1st respondent should be directed to expedite the orders thereon. 2. Taking note of the limited nature of the reliefs sought for in this writ petition, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 application with notice to the petitioner and the party respondents. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case and it is entirely for the 1st respondent to decide the issue, in accordance with law. W.P (C) No.1342 of 2011 2 Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 1st respondent, for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma /True copy/ P.A to Judge W.P (C) No.1342 of 2011 3