IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2727 of 2010 Between: Manchala Krishna Rao @ Krishna Murthy ..... Petitioner AND Yadam Papa Rao .....Respondent Counsel for the petitioner : Sri T. Tejeswara Rao Counsel for the respondent : Sri K.S. Murthy The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2727 of 2010 ORDER: The order passed by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Ichapuram, cannot be deciphered. However, from the perusal of the record and the facts stated by the learned counsel for both the parties, it is evident that the petitioner sought to file an E.A. with a prayer to the Court below to issue notice to him under Order 21 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’) and to direct the respondent, decree holder, to pay necessary process. This E.A. has been returned by the lower Court. It has come out during the course of hearing that the petitioner suffered a decree and in the E.P. filed by the respondent a garnishee order was issued for attachment of his salary. The petitioner failed to bring to the notice of this Court any specific provision of CPC in violation of which the said garnishee order has been passed. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by such an order, he is entitled to file a substantive application in the Court below for redressal of his grievance. Subject to the above observation, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. The registry shall place the file on administrative side to consider the poor quality of the order passed by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Ichapuram. As a sequel to dismissal of the Civil Revision Petition, CRPMP.No.3663 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 21.01.2011 ES