Crl. Misc. No. M-32884 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-32884 of 2010 Date of Decision: 10.01.2011. Karamjeet Kaur .......Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh. 1. Whether the reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.D.Sachdeva, AAG, Punjab for the State. ..... Alok Singh, J. (Oral). This is the petition seeking regular bail in FIR No. 11 dated 17.2.2009 under section 302/34 IPC, P.S. Rangar Nangal, Batala, Distt. Gurdaspur. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the investigation the petitioner, who is the sister-in-law (Jethani), was not found involved in the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that however, the petitioner has been summoned as an additional accused under section 319 Cr.P.C. and is in judicial custody w.e.f. 14.10.2010. Crl. Misc. No. M-32884 of 2010 -2- Learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab on the instructions of Mr. Harjit Singh, ASI, who is present in person in the court, states that the petitioner was not present at the time of occurrence. Without considering any opinion on the merits of the case, I think that the petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail. The petition is allowed. Let the petitioner be enlargted on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE January 10, 2011 gurpreet