IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CASE No.4041 of 2010 ==================================================== 1. RAJENDRA CHOUDHARY @ RAJENDRA PD. CHOUDHARY @ RAJENDRA PD. MAHTA. 2. BIRENDRA CHOUDHARY @ HIRA CHOUDHARY @ BIRENDRA PRASAD CHOUDHARY @ BIRENDRA KUMAR CHOUDHARY 3. KANJAIYA LAL MAHATHA @ KANHAIYA LAL CHOUDHARY. 4. RAMCHANDRA CHOUDHARY @ RAMCHANDRA PRASAD CHOUDHARY @ RAMCHANDRA PRASAD MAHATHA. SL. NO. 1 TO 4 ARE SONS OF LATE JAGU CHOUDHARY, RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 4, NAWADA MUNICIPALITY NAWADA NEAR MAIN ROAD (BRIDGE) NAWADA P.S. NAWADA DISTRICT- NAWADA…PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DR. SMT. SAFEENA A.N. THE COLLECTOR, NAWADA, COLLECTORATE, NAWADA. 3. SHYAM BIHARI RAI. THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, NAWADA COLLECTORATE, NAWADA. 4. SRI RUDRA NARAYAN PRASAD, THE DISTRICT LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, NAWADA. 5. UMESH PRASAD SHARMA, THE CIRCLE OFFICER, NARHAT CIRCLE NARHAT (NAWADA)…CONTEMNORS-OPPOSITE PARTIES. ==================================================== 04. 13.07.2011. Counsel for the State has filed show- cause reply annexing the order dated 05.04.2011 passed by Collector, Nawada in compliance of the order of the High Court dated 09.04.2010 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 4672 of 2010, Annexure-1, whereunder it has been held that petitioners have no legal right to claim compensation for acquisition of land which their ancestors acquired through sale-deed dated 08.07.1940 as thereunder ancestor of the petitioners acquired title over Khata No. 165, Plot No. 346, Area 15 decimal whereas the land 2 which has been acquired for raising the approach road to the bridge-in-question bears Khata No. 171. Counsel for the petitioners states that in Paragraph-1 of the order dated 05.04.2011 Collector, Nawada has described the property and there itself it is written that the Revisional Survey Khata number of the plot-in- question is 181 but she has passed the order with reference to Khata No. 171 which is apparently a mistake. Such mistake may be highlighted before the Collector who shall pass appropriate order in the matter. This contempt petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid order dated 05.04.2011 as also the subsequent order which the Collector shall pass provided it is against the petitioners. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)