IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 2125 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 02/12/2004 in WP No. 22234 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1. L. Ramalaxmamma W/o Pitchi Reddy R/o Lllirampet Village, B. Kodur Mandal, Kadapa District 2. K. Vijayamma W/o Ramachandra Reddy R/o Lllirampet Village, B. Kodur Mandal, Kadapa District ..... APPELLANTS AND 1.The District Collector, Kadapa District, Kadapa. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajampet, Kadapa District. 3.The Mandal Revenue Officer, B. Kodur Mandal, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: Mr. L.J.VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORAL JUDGMENT: (per The Honourable Sri Devinder Gupta, the Chief Justice) We are not inclined to interfere with such an order passed by the learned Single Judge relegating the writ petitioners-appellants to the remedy of preferring an appeal before the Collector against the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer. Needless to add that the appellants can take-up all grounds taken herein in the appeal to be preferred before the Collector, which, of course, has to be decided in accordance with law. The appellants pray for interim protection. The interim protection can be obtained by the appellants while preferring appeal before the Collector. The Writ Appeal, therefore, is dismissed. No costs. ______________________ DEVINDER GUPTA, C.J. 23.12.2004. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. VR. To 1.The District Collector, Kadapa District, Kadapa. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajampet, Kadapa District. 3.The Mandal Revenue Officer, B. Kodur Mandal, Kadapa District. 4. Two CCs to Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 5. Two CD copies.