1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.APPA 223 OF 2009. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA. VS DILIP PANDURANG PILLEWAN ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri V. A. Thakre, APP for applicant State. Coram : A.H. JOSHI, J. Date : 30th March, 2010. 1. This is an appeal preferred by the State against the judgment of acquittal. 2. Learned Special Judge has acquitted the accused for the offence punishable under Section 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. 3. It has come on record in prosecution evidence that money was handed over to him for the purpose of giving it to his superior officer. Same is the defence as suggested in the cross examination as well as disclosed in the statement under Section 313 of Criminal Procedure Code. 2 4. Learned Special Judge found this defence to be most probable and therefore, preferred to disbelieve the prosecution story. 5. The judgment which is based on strong probabilities and the defence as disclosed has resulted in the order of acquittal.. 6. The Judgment impugned is based on strong reasons and does not call for interference. 7. Application and appeal have no merit and are rejected. Judge |mule|