^jy \zT^y-^ IN THE HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (Sl N0. '^^Wi. /2010 PETITIONER ^/^J-"" Sunil Kuinar Sharma S/o. Shri Parmesh Prasad Sharma Aged about 55 years, R/o. Geetanjali Park, Maharshi School, Road, Mangala, Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) >»- ^- VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary Forest Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). 2. Prime Chief Conservator of Forest (Admn.), Aranyak Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^3. Conservator of Forest, Bilaspur Circle, Bilasur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE^26 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT, DIRECTION, QRDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER iE—"1" XI-HC—78 sn^Ti ^ [<-<j+ W(I SIT^TI giqpf; -+ 3~5T '<<I^M<-1, ©Tli'M'Ka,ra|(v|iy'j,< VJA.^.<y.:3^ll}.^. SiT^T TT5Ri' (Tpfgq^ET) ?ww(!fNan^( SB : Hon'bte Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava. J. 15.07^)10 Shri Bhupendra Singh, counset f(ir the petittoner. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel La advance copy. Heard. Grievance of the petitioner as s| gradation list of Deputy Rangers, th| S.No.306 showing him to be appointec) 25-06-2003 whereas petitioner was pr<jmoted on the said post vide order dated 28-07-1994 as referred to in (Annexure P-2). It is submitted that on has been kept down below in the grad^tion list, whereas he is entjtled to be plaoed in the list just after S.No.qi4. Highlighting this anomaly, the petitioner preferred a representatbn iijrimediately after the gradation list (Annexure P-1) was issued, vide his wrfi?rfN-WTCif ^'fs-ist TfSRgTC ^T sffipEi an^i ^yer fbr the State/respondents on ^t out in the petition is that in the • petitioner has been placed at on the post of Deputy Ranger on posting order dated 19-08-1994 accoynt of this mistake, petitioner but, no decision has been taken. Ther^after, the Divisional Forest Cfficer vide his memo dated 21-10-2009 recorfimended the case ofthe petitioner for consideration and correctbn of ser(iority list, but till date, no decision on the same has been taken nor grac(ation list correoted. On acoount of suoh illegal placement, petitioner stiffered supereession also when number of junior Deputy Rangers ^/ere promoted vide order dated 10-10-2008 (Annexure P-5). From a perusal of order datecj petitioner was promoted and posted a^ Deputy Ranger in the year1994 whereas in the gradation list (Annexuif representation dated 03-09-2008, 19-08-1994, it is found that the ^ P-1) was shown to be promoted .^"^^ f&^ ' '^ Sir'1. ^ ^ 1,. >^^L.^'"X1-HC—7S |l—lNBft< Sli^I^iI^fRi ws sn^i *4i* Tumane '3^ •<ll<ll<vl'il, ®Tiiy'is,[sioiyy ...^.l.yi^.:.!7>LiM^ SH^T •q?W (•ipf^^ET) on the post of Deputy Ranger in ciroumstances, respondent No.2 is claim of seniority within a period of a copy of this order, With the afbresaid direction, the +wk']41-< im?ff 'S fs^ <(»i<^i< '^affinan^! the year 2003. Under these hei^by directed to decide petitioner's of thr^e months from the date of receipt »titionis finally disposed of. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge