IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19042 of 2010 SUDHIR KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Niranjan Kumar Singh, Adv. For the informant : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. Ram Priya Saran Singh, A.P.P. ------ 2/ 26.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsels for the informant and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail since 25.03.2010 in a case registered under sections 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the first information report that the petitioner being the teacher in the school gave mobile to the victim when the call came from victim’s house. After that the victim went in the orchard and thereafter she was missing. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a teacher in the Government School and it is alleged only that the petitioner gave his mobile to victim on coming of call from house of the victim on the mobile of the petitioner, thereafter the victim went in the orchard to talk and thereafter she did not return. Hence on mere suspicion the petitioner has been roped in the present case. The petitioner brought on record Annexure-2, an affidavit sworn by the victim to the effect that she is 19 years of age and has married with one Govind Kumar in a temple and - 2 - in that affidavit she has not named the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that after the mobile was handed over by the petitioner, the victim got traceless. Considering the aforesaid submissions, for the purposes of bail, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Korha P.s. Case No. 55 of 2010. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) BTiwary/