IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33508 of 2008 1. MAHENDRA YADAV S/o late Gaiv Yadav 2. Dinesh Yadav S/o late Raso Yadav 3. Chaitu Yadav S/o Sri Mahendra Yadav 4. Bijo Yadav S/o Harchu Yadav 5. Rangi Yadav S/o late Beku Yadav 6. Lagan Yadav S/o Sri Patwari Yadav. Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 4/ 27.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there was enmity between the parties and allegedly incident took place on 6.6.2008 in which only hard and blunt substances were used but victim was taken to hospital on 7.6.2008. I think, the learned counsel mean to say that it may not be a case of 302 of I.P.C., apart from petitioners’ innocence but enmity was existing which can be taken a reason for incident. There are several circumstances, including economy of the family to approach the hospital. Admittedly, injury is found on the person of the deceased may be of hard and blunt substances but resulting into death. So, I do not find this is a fit case for grant of bail. Accordingly, the application is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)