lv\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIONNo. °tfc<5 /2001 , (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) PETITIONER ^{f''' .-^^'^^' ^.'-•";^^6.-- ^•^^y .-^ 1. MAHAVIRPRATHMIKSAHAKARI UPBHOKTA BHANDAR MARYADIT KHAMTARAlWARD, RAIPUR, a Cooperative Consumer Society registered under the provisions of M.P. Co-operative Society Act, 1960, having it's office at Raipur Chhattisgarh, Tah. and Dist. Raipur Chhattisgarh. ^ NAVODAYA PRATHMIK UPBHOKTA SAHAKARI BHANDAR MARYADIT, NAYAPARA ( RAJIM), a Cooperative Consumer Society registered under the provisions of M.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 having it's office at Nayapara (Rajim) Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. MAMTA PRATHMIK UPBHOKTA SAHKARI BHANDAR MARYADIT, Mana, a Cooperative Consumer Society registered underthe provision of M.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 having it's office at Mana, Tahsil & Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 4. PRIYADARSHINIMAHILAPRATHMIK SAHKARI UPBHOKTA BHANDAR MARYADIT, a Cooperative Consumer Society registered underthe provisionsof M.P. Cooperative Consumer Society registered underthe provision of M.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 having it's office at Kota ward, Raipur Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh). //VERSUS// RESPONDENTS 2. V STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGHSEGRETARY, Food and Civil Supplies Department Mantralaya D.K. Bhawan, Raipur. The Director, Food and Civil Supplies Department Mantralaya. D.K.Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), 1 ^ri-L ^U .jn / yiaiMi Mu Noij-niiisNon ZZ79Z'S--3:l3TlM¥-i?38W~'w5IITr3d-ITar' / <: » " 3'ltW'EBI wisn^i ,,lt \^v Trot-arr f:..'v!.?.:..CI.£'?J.?^l 3i^T1q^^ (iraf3S!^T) ?imff wit'g sii^ ih WRJf tf fWt -^R^TC ^'•affOTsn^i Diviston Bench: ION'BLE SHRI A.K. PATNAIK. C.ll. & HON'BLE SHRI FAKHRUDDIN. ll, 16-03-2005. | Heard Mr. Bhadar Paya^ii, leamed counsel for ttte t»Uttoners and Mr. V.V.S. Murthy, leamed Dy. j^.G. for the State of Chhattisgarh. Mr. Bhaskar Payashi dates jUiat In this petifion ttie peUtioners have challenged tte scheme of the S^te Goverranent relatfng to the PubNc DistribuUon of essential commoditfes. H®fuiVver stetss that new schem® has now been introduced by the jState Govemment and, therefore, this writ peUtron has become infructuou^. In view of the said submis^ion, this writ pefition te dismissed as irrfructuous. However, llberty is gr^nted to the peUBoners to chalfenge #ie new scheme of Publte Distribution ^T essenBal commodlties, ifadvfeed. Sd/- Quef Justice Sdt- Fakhruddin Judge tiBS