IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7483 of 2010 BINOD MURMU . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 12.03.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 419, 420 and other provisions of the Penal Code is that even as per allegations it was the petitioner who was impersonated and it is the beneficiary Bhagwat Yadav who was performing duty who was liable to answer rather than the petitioner. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R. K. Mishra, Judicial Magistrate, lst Class, Bhagalpur in Kotwali (Tilkamanjhi) PS Case No.742 of 2007. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)