HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI C.R.P No:2621 OF 2010 Dated: 9.7.2010 Between: 1. K.N. Jyothi and another ..Petitioners And 1. K.V. Ranga Rao and another .. Respondents. This Court made the following HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:2621 OF 2010 ORDER: This revision is directed against the order, dated 31.5.2010 passed in I.A.No.1387 of 2010 in A.S.No.129 of 2010 by the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The revision petitioners herein are the appellants before the lower appellate Court. Originally, the suit in O.S.No.308 of 2007 was filed by the 1st respondent herein against the petitioners herein and another seeking permanent injunction restraining them from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the car parking place allotted by Vasudha Estates, for four vehicles of four wheelers on the Eastern side of Lift and Staircase. The suit was decreed. On that, the petitioners herein filed the appeal before the lower appellate Court along with the present application in I.A.No.1387 of 2010 under Order XLI Rule 5 (1) of CPC seeking to grant of stay of operation of the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.308 of 2007 by the learned XVI Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The lower appellate Court dismissed the above application. Aggrieved by the same, the present revision has been filed. Heard the learned Counsel and perused the material available on record. The main grievance of the petitioners is that they are parking their vehicles in the parking places allotted to them for the last decade and they are not interfering with the parking place of the 1st respondent herein and if the 1st respondent- plaintiff is allowed to prevent them from parking under the guise of the decree in the suit, they will be put to serious loss and injury. In view of the facts and circumstances and the nature of the proceedings, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, it is just and proper to direct both the parties not to interfere with each other in respect of the respective car parking places pending the appeal. Accordingly, the CRP is disposed of. No order as to costs. However, in view of the controversy between the parties, the lower appellate Court is directed to dispose of the appeal, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. ________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari Date: 9th July, 2010 Nn. HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:2621 OF 2010 09.07.2010