IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2008 / 11TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 9615 of 2008(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ THITHIMMU W/O.HASSAN HAJI, NEDUVANCHERY HOUSE RANDATHANI POST, KALPAKANCHERY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.K.P.SUDHEER RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SUB INSEPCTOR OF POLICE KALPAKANCHERY POLICE STATION KALPAKANCHERY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MALAPPURAM. 3. MOIDEENKUTTY, S/O.SAIDU MOHAMMED NEDUVANCHERY HOUSE, RANDATHANI POST, KALPAKANCHERY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY GOVT.PLEADER SHRI SALIM P.A. FOR R1 & R2 ADV. SRI.A.KRISHNAN FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C)No. 9615/08 PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF PETITION DATED 1.3.2008 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF FIR DATED 1.3.2008 IN CRIME NO.108/08 OF KALPAKANCHERRY POLICE STATION TRUE COPY K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR AND P.N.RAVINDRAN, JJ. --------------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No. 9615/08-T ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 31st DAY OF MARCH, 2008 J U D G M E N T Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioner has approached this court alleging that the 3rd respondent is threatening her and harassing her. The said respondent is her brother-in-law. The petitioner's husband and 3rd respondent purchased a plot of land having an extent of 10.62 cents in survey No.101/2 of Kalpakancherry Village. Now the 3rd respondent is trying to alienate the property to third parties without her husband's knowledge or consent. So, her husband filed a suit claiming partition of the property. The 3rd respondent is irritated by that step and he has started threatening her. Therefore, she moved the Police for protection. Since the Police did not extend any help to her, this writ petition is filed seeking appropriate reliefs. 2. The learned Government Pleader upon instructions submitted that the parties are relatives. There is dispute between them concerning the above said property and also W.P.(C)No. 9615/08-T -2- regarding the right to pluck coconuts from another 30 cents of land owned by the petitioner's mother-in-law. There is no situation warranting interference of the Police or extension of Police protection. The 3rd respondent has filed a counter affidavit. According to him he has no intention whatsoever to harass or harm the petitioner. In fact he was attacked by her and a crime has been registered against her. We record the submission of the 3rd respondent that he has no intention whatsoever to harm or harass the petitioner. Recording that submission, this writ petition is disposed of. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. dsn