WP(C) 4241/2008 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Heard Mr P. Sarmah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Ms M. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department appearing for responde nt Nos. 1, 2 and 3. None appeared for the private respondents. Considering the grievance raised in the writ petition and as agreed to b y the learned counsel appearing for the parties, this writ petition is being dis posed of at the motion stage itself. Petitioners’ case in brief, is that the petitioners were selected by the District Level Committee (DLC for short), Cachar, Silchar for being appointed o n compassionate ground in the posts of Assistant Teachers in different LP/ME/MV Schools against which their names were shown in the select list dated 4.6.2004 issued by the District Elementary Education Officer, Cachar, Silchar and appoint them in any other schools within the district. The respondent authorities have appointed the selected candidates of other districts on compassionate ground who were selected through the same process. But inspite of the same, the respondent authority appointed some fresh candidates in Cachar district vide appointment o rder under Memo No. EAA(B) 11/2008/212 dated 28.8.2008 instead of the instant pe titioners. Being aggrieved, the petitioners have approached this Court praying f or a direction to the respondent authority to place their cases before the DLC f orthwith. It is submitted at the Bar that the issue involved in this instant writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 03.08.2006 passed i n a batch of writ petitions, the leading case being WP(C) No. 3875/2005 (Achyut Ranjan Das & Ors. Vs. the State of Assam & Ors.) reported in (2006) 4 GLT 674 as well as order dated 2.7.2010 passed in WP(C) No. 2620/2009 ( Faziron Nessa Vs. State of Assam and others) and in similar other cases. In view of the same, thi s writ petition is disposed of with direction that the direction given and obser vation made in the aforesaid writ petitions shall be applicable to the case of t he present petitioners also. The petitioners shall serve copies of the orders passed in Achyut Ranjan Das (su pra) and Faziron Nessa (supra) along with a copy of the writ petition with the annexures appended thereto before the authority for doing the needful. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.