IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43052 of 2009 SHAMBHOO SAHNI @ SHAMBHOO KEWAT S/O DHANIK LAL SAHNI @ KEWAT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.12.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 342, 324, 347, 387 and 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the kidnapping was not for the purposes of ransom or killing and subsequently the matter was compromised between the parties, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 24.9.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Samastipur in Warisnagar P.S.case No.41 of 2000, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail and (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. The fact that the informant has compromised the - 2 - matter will be verified by the Magistrate concerned before releasing the petitioner on bail. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )