IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7391 of 2010 Date of Decision : April 27, 2010. Bawa Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Gurminder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner was promoted as Kanungo on 25.1.1994 after granting relaxation under the Rules. He was further promoted as Naib Tehsildar on 25.1.1999. He has now been served with a show cause notice dated 15.4.2010 (Annexure P-6), purported to be in compliance with the order of this Court dated 29.3.2010, passed in CWP No.5694 of 2007, to show cause as to why the relaxation earlier granted to him be not withdrawn and he be not reverted to the original post. The petitioner, on the other hand, relies upon certain certificates of the recommendations made by the Departmental Authorities in order to suggest that there existed sufficient circumstances to invoke the relaxation power under the Rules. C.W.P.No .7391 of 2010 2 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered view that since only a show cause notice has been served upon the petitioner, he may submit his reply thereto before the Competent Authority who shall then consider the same in accordance with the Rules and pass an appropriate speaking order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in the above- stated terms. It is further directed that if the reply to the show cause notice does not find favour, the consequential order(s) shall not be given effect for a period of two weeks. Disposed of. Dasti. April 27, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE