I T_A§RXNISTX EYRAIPUR 6rinal §$ah ND; al p§11mL$ 9 1998 f Apgli: iq uni Ch& ag au 4 y aan s Sl a aara gd bm£ 3 a “ m $ Pa.a, Tar, :5dnn 9F Bhariual Ba, 5andChww,Raipu ‘.. Sankirtan Sahu, ah&u yaar aan m? Bih Lal Sahu, Villagw Parsahal, P.0° asna; $£t.— Raipux m.Pe Basdan% E; Q . a ; gh £ § pwns: 1a The astetary Sf&te wf éo W.P §f Thrwu .§. Scgmi £n e%ian ,, &laya,Va1aBw awana Bwalg (M.P} Tha Cammiiorf Birr Puic Inuc9ns» Bhapal .P} 2a ssna ac a bl 3a Th&. Dictgr Eca£imng ct£a Hi$$£ic. Raipux {m.Pv) mmumm; ct; 19 g 4 H — W N TH m P. SETEQE’VE TQixUN L,BENCH ¢$ 9 ganux%ann§r Ex~aash &1t KaVda &,k‘z, F aga& t 39 a wri & i B Di a Varsus duca Dap £ ma rl Bh ha . s x i (N¢ y¢ re du Edgaw t~ APPLImTmN imam smvmw 19 aF THF AmINTWQATIVE A %. @ w..‘.&‘ta..)ma.2ér.39 20$ mm (Wu) mwm WWW ammm \ WW wm *mm 8.3: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. ITINKER DIWAKER 03-08-2009: Shri Anupam Dubey, coun el for the petitioner; Shri Shashank Thakur, Pa e1 Lawyer for the State. ' With the consent of the pa ies, the matter is heard finally. Counsel for the petitioner ts to withdraw the present petition with liberty to tile fresh re resentation before the State of Chhattisgarh' in view of the ci ular dated 9.6.2008. He however submits that directed may be is ued for deciding histrepresentation expeditiously to which counsel fo the State has no objection. Accordingly, the writ petit on is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. The represe tation if filed by the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same is expected to be deci ed by the competent authority within a further period of four months fr m the date of its receipt. it is made clear that this ourt has not expressed any opinion authorities concerned would be at liberty to decide the representati n strictly in accordance with law. i I upon the merits of the case and Sd/— i a 1 Pritinker Diwaker " Judge ' n