IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY , NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2719 of 2007 (Sadashiv Balaji Kukde .vs. Venubai Leeladhar Parate & Ors.) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : R.V.More, J. DATE : January 15, 2008. Heard Mr.S.D.Garad, Adv. for the Petitioner and Mr.Joharapurkar, Adv. for the Respondents. By the order impugned in the present petition, the legal heirs of the deceased decree holder are brought on record in the execution proceedings. The contention of the present petitioner is that there is delay in bringing legal heirs of decree holder on record and in absence of the application for condonation of this delay, the legal heirs cannot be brought on record. The learned executing Court, however, in view of the provisions of Order XXII, Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, negatived the contentions of the petitioner/Judgment Debtor and the respondents/Decree holders are directed to carry out amendment. There is no error apparent in the impugned order calling for interference by this Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition is devoid of merits. Hence, the same is dismissed. The interim relief is vacated. JUDGE ssj