IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5803 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- PRAMILABEN B RAT Versus DIRECTOR EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE SCHEME -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 5803 of 1991 MR TR MISHRA for Petitioner MR LR PUJARI, AGP for Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI Date of decision: 24/09/2003 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. When the matter is called out, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will make a representation within two weeks from today to the respondent authorities, pointing out that in case of other employees on whom the liability to pay the amount was proportionately distributed alongwith the deceased employee, the liability has been set aside by the Gujarat Civil Service Tribunal by its order dated 11-4-1991. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent authorities states that if such an application is made by the petitioner, the concerned authority of the respondent will consider the same in accordance with law and take an appropriate decision in the matter within four weeks from the date on which the representation is received, and if the representation is accepted, the dues of the petitioner will be released within four weeks thereafter. 3. In view of this arrangement, the petitioner states that the petitioner does not press for this petition at this stage without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner, and seeks permission to withdraw the same. Permission granted. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. [R.K.ABICHANDANI, J.] parmar*