IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 19TH OCTOBER 2010 / 27TH ASWINA 1932 RP.No. 902 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.2197/2009 Dated 06/07/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RES. 1-3 IN THE WPC ----------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, TOURISM DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF TOURISM, PARK VIEW, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, TOURISM DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER & R4 TO R7 IN THE WPC ----------------------------------------------- 1. JAYAKUMAR S., NOW WORKING AS HOSPITALITY ASSISTANT, GOVERNMENT GUEST HOUSE, KOVALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, RESIDING AT OOTTUKUZHI KALLUVILA VEEDU, MANGALATHUKONAM, KATTACHALKUZHI P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. T.P.SAJEEVKUMAR, BUTLER/CARETAKER, GOVERNMENT GUEST HOUSE,THRISSUR. 3. B.GOPINATHAN NAIR, BUTLER/CARETAKER, GOVERNMENT GUEST HOUSE,THRISSUR. 4. V.M.ABDUL SALAM, BUTLER/CARETAKER, GOVERNMENT GUEST HOUSE, PONMUDI. 5. JAYAKRISHNA, BUTLER/CARETAKER, GOVERNMENT GUEST HOUSE, KOZHIKODE. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------------- R.P.NO.902/2010 in W.P.(C) NO.2197 OF 2009(J) ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of October, 2010 O R D E R The contention, on the basis of which, the review petition is filed is that the petitioner does not come within the feeder category for promotion to the post of Butler. It is on that basis the review petition is filed. 2. However a reading of paragraph 4 of the judgment shows that the finding that the petitioner is in the feeder category, has been entered into on the basis of the averments in the counter affidavit filed by the first respondent itself. In that view, I do not find anything erroneous in the judgment. Review petition fails and is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/