IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 15TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3676 of 2011(H) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- DEVASSYKUTTY A.M., S/O.MATHAPPAN, ACHANDIVEETTIL, MANIKAMANGALAM, P.O.THOTTAKAM - 683 574. BY ADV. SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY SRI.G.HARIKRISHNAN (TRIPUNITHURA) RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, THRISSUR - 680 001. 2. SHRI.MOHANAN V.R., VELLAPPILLY VEEDU, POOLANI, MELOOR P.O., THRISSUR - 680 311. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 3676 of 2011 H ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 4th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P4 order issued by the District Collector, exercising his powers under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008. It cannot be disputed that the order is amenable to revision under Section 28 of the Act and, therefore, it is for the petitioner to seek revisional remedy before the Government. 2. Be that as it may, in order to enable the petitioner to file the revision and seek appropriate interlocutory orders, I direct that further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P4 order of the District Collector shall be kept in abeyance for a period of one month from today. Needless to say that, this judgment will not entitle the petitioner to alter the nature of the land in any manner during the aforesaid period. 3. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment and writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks