IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU MONDAY, THE 19TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 28TH KARTHIKA 1929 RPFC.No. 84 of 2004() --------------------- MC.208/2001 of FAMILY COURT, KOZHIKODE .................... REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------ HUSSAIN. V., S/O. PANARTHODIKAYIL MUHAMMED, PANARTHODIKAYIL HOUSE, EDAKKARA P.O., MOOTHEDAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.RAJAN VELLOTH SRI.SAIJO HASSAN SRI.SABU SREEDHARAN SRI.VIMAL KUMAR.A.V. SRI.A.G.GIRISH KUMAR RESPONDENTS: PETITIONERS: ------------------------- 1. N. NABEESA, NEROTH HOUSE, CHEROOPPA P.O., MAVOOR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. V. JASENA, (MINOR AGED 14 YEARS) D/O. N. NABEESA, NEROTH HOUSE, CHEROOPPA P.O., MAVOOR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, (MINOR 2ND RESPONDETN REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN/MOTHER, THE 1ST RESPONDENT). THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.R.UDAYABHANU, J. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R.P.(F.C).No.84 of 2004-A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 19th day of November, 2007 O R D E R The revision petitioner is the counter petitioner in M.C.No.208/2001, the proceedings initiated under Section 125 Cr.P.C, by the wife and minor child of the counter petitioner. He is under orders to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.500/- each per month. It is the contention raised herein that the revision petitioner/counter petitioner is impotent and incapable of procreation. The marriage is admitted. I find no such contention has been raised before the court below. In the circumstances and considering the fact that the amount of maintenance ordered is only reasonable, I find there is no ground to interfere in the order of the court below. The revision petition is dismissed. K.R.UDAYABHANU, Judge ms