IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18629 of 2010 1. SRIJAY KUMAR @ SRIJAY YADAV 2. BHIKHARI YADAV ------------------------ PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 28.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Money was given for employment of informant’s son to one Binay Kumar Yadav from its base for the illegal purpose if to be paid as bribe then informant and Binay Kumar Yadav appear equally liable as accused. Petitioners’ presence is there only in course of transaction for that they undertook to take initiative to return back the money but could not succeed and now apprehending for their arrest as a witness of criminal act of the informant and of one Binay Never can be justified Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two 2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in Khargpur P.S. Case No. 24/08, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)