IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM THURSDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2010 / 1ST ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 21036 of 2010(D) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- S.AYYAPPAN, S/O.SUBRAMANIAN, CHURAKKULAM ESTATE, LOWER DIVISION, VANDIPERIYAR. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SANTHAMMA RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE MANAGER, CHURAKKULAM ESTATE, VANDIPERIYAR. PIN-685 533. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, IDUKKI. 3. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION COURT, KOTTAYAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR R2 & R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BIJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.21036 of 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T ---------------------- The writ petition is filed complaining about the inaction on the part of respondents 2 and 3 in taking effective steps to realise amounts covered under Ext.P1 judgment. The petitioner filed a Workmens Compensation Case before the 3rd respondent, against the 1st respondent, which was awarded through Ext.P1 judgment. The petitioner was permitted to realise a sum of Rs.1,01,664/- along with interest, towards compensation from the 1st respondent. Eventhough the petitioner approached the 3rd respondent seeking execution of the order, no effective steps was taken after issuance of Ext.P2 show cause notice. Hence the writ petition is filed seeking appropriate directions. 2. During pendency of this writ petition, it is submitted by both sides that the 1st respondent had W.P.(C).21036/10-D -2- deposited the principal amount covered under Ext.P1, before the 3rd respondent. According to the petitioner, the balance amount of interest is due as per terms of Ext.P1. It is made clear that the petitioner is free to approach the 3rd respondent seeking for issuing revised requisition, for recovery of the balance amount, and also for release of the amount in deposit. If any such approach is made, the respondents 2 and 3 shall take effective steps for realising the balance amount due under Ext.P1. The writ petition is disposed of based on the above observations. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. okb