IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 1645 of 2010 Date of Decision: February 2, 2010 Dilbagh Singh …Petitioner Versus Union of India and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present: Mr. Anand Chhibbar, Advocate, with Mr. Dilbagh Singh, petitioner-in-person. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenges order dated 11.11.2009 (P-20) passed by the Central Ad- ministrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (for brevity, ‘the Tribunal) in Contempt Petition No. 18/2009 in OA No. 472/PB/2007. In para 4 of the order, the Tribunal has concluded that the respondents have complied with its order dated 16.5.2008 passed in the aforementioned original application and no inherent right of the applicant-petitioner has been infringed. Accordingly, the Tribunal has discharged the notice issued by it. After hearing learned counsel we are of the view that the order dated 4.3.2009 passed by the respondents after complying with C.W.P. No. 1645 of 2010 the direction issued on 16.5.2008, is required to be challenged by fil- ing an independent Original Application before the Tribunal. Mr. Chhibbar, after obtaining instructions from Mr. Dil- bagh Singh, present-in-person, has stated that the petition may be per- mitted to be withdrawn with liberty to challenge the aforesaid order. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (AJAY TEWARI) February 2, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2