I IN THE HI6H COURT OF JUbICATURE AT BILASPUR M.C.C. N0._^3^ /Z010 ®» IN THE MATTER OF:- >.l356/: Second Appeal No Appellants: Versus Respondents; APPLICANTS 6/1999 BETWEEN Mst. Lachhani & others Mst. Pakali <& others 1^-Mst. Lachhani, widow of ^{^> Bpndka Mahra, aged about 60 ^ ^ years, Cultivator. y:^ »<-' -^' o-8 y <•>• ^ <<ss '^ •^ NON-APPLICANTS 2. Sonmati, daughter of Bondka Mahra, aged about 40 years, Cultivator. 5., Panchmi, wife of Khejuram Mahra, aged about 45 years, Cultivator. / ^basmi, wife of Anturam Vs Mhara, aged about 35 years, Cultivator. All residents of Village Bastar Tahsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar. 1. Mst. Pakati, w/o Chainu Mahra, aged about 60 yegrs, Cultivator. '. Lachhman, d/o Chainu Mahra, aged about 40 years, Cultivator. 3. Kamalwati, w/o Sudu Mahra, aged about 35 years, G Ci •^ .^ rpi— L- ^ Cultivator. ,4. Bomla,d/o Sudu Mahra,aged about 13 years, a minor. i. Bhairi d/o Sudu Mahra, aged about 11 years,a minor. < Shanti, d/o Sudu Mahra, aged about 22 years, Cultivator. ../7. Maata,son of Lachhu Mahra, ^" aged about 5 years, Cultivator, AAinor. I. Budhsan son of 6oju Mahra, aged about 65 years, Cultivator. 9< Bhalu, w/o Budhru Mahra, aged about 58 years, Cultivator. IQ," Thirli alias Sukhdeo, Son of Budhru Mahra, aged about 35 years, Cultivator. U. Ludu Son of Budhru Mahra, aged about 30 years, Cultivator. ;2. Masu, son of Budhru Mahar, aged about 28 years, Cultivator. >3. 6oma, son of Budhru Mahar, aged about 27 years, Cultivator. y/14. Ludaru, son of Budhru Mahar", 1 ^ ~ 3 ^^^.-^s-,^^ S^ws% aged about Cultivator. 23 years, 1S. Dayalu, son of Budhru Mahar, aged about 21 years, Cultivator. . 16. Sulo, son of Budhru Mahar, aged about 25 years, Cultivator. 17. Padmani, daughterof Budhru Mahar, aged about 22 years, Cultivator. Respondent No.4, 5 <& 7 being minors through their next friend and guardian Lachhman (Respondent No.2). All residents of Village Bastar Junagudapara, Tehsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar. The State of Madhya Rradesh, through the Colleetor, Bastar, Jagdalpur (MP), (Defendant No.18) APPLICATOIN FOR RESTORATION OF S.A. N0.1356/99 OISMISSEb FOR WANT OF PRO&ECUTION VI&E ORDER bATEb27'"7.2010 an^i qii !<•)!* w sv^t **ii<* K- 'S^ -^ww-tf, ^fll^'l'a, fsRTRTy ^—.^z^^^.:..53>6Z..L£ 3iI^rT15RT(^i3'r^cT) wnm^ftaw^f S.B. Hon'bte Shri Justtee Prdshant Kxmnr Mislwa 29.09.2018. Shri Kshitiz Shanna, cot(n^l for the appiieants Heard <m I.A. No.1 On due considCTatton ^ applteation, prayer Tor condonslti The delay in filing the Heard on apfriteatim 1^6/19^, which was Courton 27-07-2010. The reasons assgne<l considered and found to Accordir^ly, the M.C.C. Second Appeai No. 1^E number. ffanet Lawyer for Uie State. for CTtndonation of d^ay. ^id for the regfions assigned in the i|tion of delay is allowed. re^twatton appiicsrtion is cond&ned. T<t restoration of Second Appeal No. dianis^d for want of prosecution by this •*l<<Icl<il-f *<|t|i"ii ^fIvS <ra($i< •^•sffim .311^1 for defautt in a^t^irance is be su^sient. )s altwved. 5%?1999 is restored to its originat Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge wioO'r A*r ii!;"iid<i, aB.ri?']H —FS/T47—2/2UI n—i,00,000. .;.,*,. ^f f ^ .S. i:'^ i.^.^^. A.-, •! ..:.»•^-" J...^' •/^, .^...^. ...A.J,.