IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36744 of 2009 SHYAM BIHARI RAI SON OF LATE JAI KISHUN RAI RESIDENT OF MIRAMPUR,P.S.RAGHOPUR,DISTT.VAISHALI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 28.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner seeks bail in Raghopur P.S.Case No. 27 of 2006. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected twice. The recovery was of commercial quantity of ganja and the petitioner is facing trial under Section 20(B)(1) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. The provision of grant of bail to an accused who is involved in offence relating to recovery of commercial quantity is prescribed under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act and the accused is entitled to be released only if the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offence and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. There is nothing on record from which these inferences can be drawn. Considering the mandate of law, I am 2 not inclined to reconsider the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is again rejected. However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)