IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18393 of 2010 1. MISRI LAL RAI 2. Umesh Rai 3. Ramawatar Rai 4. Lal Babu Rai 5. Madhuri Rai Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 28.06.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the prayer of the petitioners no. 1 and 2, inasmuch as during the pendency of the application they have been arrested. Such permission is accorded. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn as against petitioners no. 1 and 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is land dispute in between both the family members. Petitioners neither have been alleged for committing theft nor for specific assault. There is specific allegation against only Misri Lal and Surendra Rai. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the petitioners no. 3, 4 and 4 for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within 2 one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No. 31 of 2010, above named petitioners no. 3, 4 and 5 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)