IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATnSGARH s^& ^^ WritPetitionNo3fcl:t of 2005 ,.\ / -..-'?v-'t> .••• ,^^^.. ^ft^-^S-^.^' ^•••"^^'€.--""" cS^'V''..^-" <^5':il" y ^ s- RESPONDENTS: - Versus - 1. Kum. Neha Rawlani, D/o Dr. Prakash Rawlani, Aged abOAit 18 years, R/o Shyam Nagar Road, Katora Tala, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Deptt. of Health & FamilyWetfare, D.K.S. Building, Mantraiaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. The Director, Medical Education, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Science (CIMS), Bilaspur, Through the Dean, CIMS, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRrTS. DIRECTIONS ETC.. IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT QF LIKE NATURE \3^>q '«i<<ic)«,ui-alt-ns, Rlril<Hy'< ^^^v^--^.^.^^..[^^200 3ii^sTmR')i<h P!'ITaiI^CTd>tlicb San/e 3n^?TVFS (ijc|ij<s|<g) ?^Tr8R?ifeTan^?T 30-9-2005 Shri V.R. Tjwari with Shr Shri Sandeep Dubey, *l«fd41-1*ll«ldl"^fe><a^Rf^K ^3lf^T3II^?T B.D. Guru, counsel for the pefitioner. Sovt. Advocate for the State/respondente No.1 and2. Shri Manindra Shrivasftva, Sr. Advocate wnth Shri Amrito Das, Advocate for respondent No.3.') The main grievance of ^he petitioner in this writ petition Is that the counseiing which was eon+cted for payment seat has not been conciucted in a proper mannerjtherefora, respondents be direcSed to fill-up complete seats as shown in ^ie prescribed table i.e. 8 seats of women unrsserved category of manag^ment quota (payment seats). After passing the orde^ No.3642/2004 filed by Sudeed by the Full Bench of this Court in W.P. Shrivastava, this petition does not survive for the reason that in the Full ^ench order fte system of payment seat has been quashed and it has been on the basis of merit subject t^ those candidates. directed.that respondents shouid admit the students against 41 seats whi^h were meant for the payment seats strtetly 1 reservation and claim fee to be chaiged by Therefore, in view of t Court, this writ peUtion does and it is accordingly dismissecj fie order passsd by the Fult Bench of this hot surviye, same is liable to be dismissed I. Nocoste. —_ Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge