IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24770 of 2009 RAM DAYAL RAM SON OF LATE NASHIB RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AGRER KHURD, P.S. SURAJPJURA, DISTT. ROHTAS. ----- PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 16/11/2009 Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. The case is under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The F.I.R. was instituted by the petitioner himself in respect of his missing nephew. Subsequently, the dead body of his nephew was found from Canal and suspicion has been raised against the petitioner himself of having killed the deceased on account of some land dispute. Case diary was called for and, after going through the same, learned State Counsel has submitted that some witnesses have raised suspicion against the petitioner on account of dispute of property. However, he was unable to point out any substantial evidence which could give credence to the suspicion raised by the prosecution side. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 17.3.2009. It is also said that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this application is allowed. Let petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas, in connection with Surajpura P.S. Case No. 84 of 2008 with conditions as laid down in sub-section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. S.Ali (J.N. Singh, J.)