IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 13TH MARCH 2007 / 22ND PHALGUNA 1928 WP(C).No. 15504 of 2006(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ AMBILI K.S., W/O. GOKUL DAS N.N., `BUDDHA', T.C.11/1288, MANNUTHY POST, THRISSUR-680 651. BY ADV. SMT.LATHA PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BLOCK OFFICE, OLLUKARA POST, THRISSUR-680 655. 2. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, NATIONAL SAVINGS DIRECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR. *3. THE POST MASTER GENERAL, OFFICE OF THE PMG, HEAD POST OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. *4. THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POSTS, HEAD POST OFFICE, THRISSUR. (* IMPLEADED AS ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 3 & 4 IN THE WP(C) VIDE ORDER DATED 13/03/2007 IN I.A.No 11719/2006.) BY ADV. SHRI.N.MANOJ KUMAR, GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV.SHRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, FOR ADDL. RESPONDENTS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------- WP(C) No. 15504 of 2006 U ----------------------------------------- Dated, this the 13th day of March, 2007 J U D G M E N T The petitioner’s grievance appears to be that an agent collecting deposits under the National Savings Scheme has cheated her. However, since petitioner did not have details of payments made and respondents in the writ petition also do not have, petitioners impleaded additional respondents 3 and 4. The learned Standing Counsel for respondents 3 & 4 submitted that the additional 3rd respondent will furnish details of deposits made in the name of the petitioner and her son. Accordingly this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 3rd respondent to furnish details called for by the petitioner based on Ext.P13, a copy of which will be furnished by the petitioner along with a copy of this judgment to the additional 3rd respondent. There will be direction to the additional 4th respondent to conduct enquiry about the agent against whom petitioner has complained and if any irregularity is noticed, he will file police complaint against the agent concerned and take steps to cancel agency, so that no one gets cheated at least in the future. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.) jg