IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8779 of 2008 GANESHWARI SHARMA, son of Late Ramji Sharma, resident of Village-Mananbigha, P.S.Parasbigha, in the District of Jehanabad. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Director General and Inspector General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Additional Director General, Bihar Military Police Force, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Commandant, B.M.P.-11, Jamshedpur, Tata,in the State of Jharkhand. 4. The Commandant, Jharkhand Military Police Force-6, Jamshedpur, in the State of Jharkhand. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 18.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears on behalf of the State. However, Mr Dhruba Mukherjee, learned counsel appears for respondents no.3 and 4. On behalf of the petitioner submission is that the petitioner retired from the office of respondent no.3 as a Constable with effect from 1st of March, 1989 before the bifurcation of the State. The grievance is that the petitioner has not been paid his arrears of pension as also certain arrears of salary. Learned counsel appearing for respondents no.3 and 4 submits that since the petitioner has retired prior to the bifurcation of the State, he has to seek his relief from respondents no.1 and 2. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Additional Director General, Bihar Military Police Force, Bihar, Patna (respondent no.2), with a copy - 2 - each to respondent no.3 and 4 for sending the necessary information/papers in order to consider his claim by respondent no.2. In case such a representation is filed stating the details of his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled to enable him to receive the admitted dues, if any, with interest permissible under the rules. However, upon consideration, if any of the claims or any part of the claims is found not admissible, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)