IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.855 of 2011 RAVI SHANKAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 29.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and admittedly, both victims have already returned to their home safely and furthermore, their statements were recorded in course of investigation. Although learned Addl. Sessions Judge I, Motihari has referred paragraphs 104 and 105 of the case diary but from perusal of the aforesaid paragraphs, it would appear that both the victims have not named the petitioner. It appears from perusal of paragraph 54 of the case diary that name of this petitioner came in the confessional statement of co-accused Chandra Shekhar Singh @ Chandeshwar Singh who has already been granted privilege of bail by another bench of this court vide order dated 4.7.2005 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 2159/2005. Although several paragraphs have been referred by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge in his impugned order but the aforesaid paragraphs do not suggest the complicity of the petitioner in the alleged crime. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let petitioner, Ravi Shankar Singh @ Damgu Singh, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, - 2 - Motihari, East Champaran in Chhatuani P.S. Case no. 66 of 2004 subject to the condition that one of the sureties must be co-relative of the petitioner. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)