ir c^ ' ! rs-ir. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Wnt Petition (Sl No. ^5~^\ /2009 PETITIONER: •^•F'y> ^ ^ ^F^ ^yy >*' RESPONDENTS: Umeshwar Prasad Daftuar, S/p^Xkhileshwar Prasad Daftuar, Aged 40 years, Occupation:- Service, Posted as Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Chuhankdand, Block:- Lakhanpur, Ambikapur District:- Sarguja (C.G.), Presently Working as Cluster Acadeinic Coordinator at Cluster Centre, Amgashi, R/o Village- Lakhanpur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) - Versus - State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Education Development, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) ^ 2. Collector, Ainbikapur District:- Sarguja (C.G.) ^ 3. District Education Officer, Ambikapur, District:- Sarguja (C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 'lll:! 31^1 WlnW 7T^i 73iR?r spi^F ^s o NWdl shMl<*i ^-ac[ ,-it|it||<«|.y, a-alwis, Fqtar^t ^_....tAi^:Xs3..'%i-u..^^. 200c) 3<lt?I1<W? (" 'TOTOtflfeian^l SB : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICB PRlfTINKBR DIWAKER 30.07.2009 Shri Sunil Tripathi, counsel Ms. SunitaJain,P.L. forthe Chaltenge in the present 30.6.2009 passed by the responde4t No.3 bywhich the petitioner who is working as Assistant Teacher l"|as been transferred from Primaiy School, Chuhltandand, Block Lal^hanpur to the option of District Education Officer, Ramanujgary. Contention of the counsel he has been transferred to a according to him, the seniority maintained district wise and thi compelled to @o on transfer he will decided in accordance with law. Counsel for the peUtioner Accordingly, the petition is 'tlNd'-il'l fm'S ^ ffS <{a|«Slt ii^Rragi^r ?or the petitioner. State. petition is to the order dated for the petitioner is that Block Lakhanpur coines within the educafion district of Ambikapur whereas yifferent Education district and of Assistant Teachers is being |refore if the petitioner is being tuffer an irreparable loss. Contention of counsel for tl|ie State is that let the petitioner make a representation to the respotident No.3 and the saine would be ^grees to make a representation. However he submits that till hi^ representation is decided, the petitioner nnay be given some prote<(tive order. 4isposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a representatio^ within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of the copy o|F this order, the saine would be decided by the authorities concem^d within a period of three weeks from the date of its receipt. Till thefi the impugned order shall not be given effect to and the petitmner |would be allowed to perform his duties in his present placeof postin^. -— —— Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ^)