IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3689 of 2011. Decided on: 24th May, 2011. Dhani Ram ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and Ors. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the respondents-state: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is physically challenged person. He is aggrieved by his transfer. According to him, as per the present transfer he will have to change three buses and it will cause severe hardship to him . There are other grievances as well. It is also pointed out that if the transfer is made only to accommodate the fifth respondent, who is in and around Talmehra for the last around 5 years. All these aspects, the petitioner may point out before the second respondent within a period of three days from today, in which case the second respondent will look into the matter and take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law, justice and equity within another two weeks. Till the orders are passed as above, in case the petitioner has not been relieved as on today, further proceedings in that regard will be deferred for the time being. Needless to say that the parties to the writ petition will work in their respective places prior to the order of transfer till such time. The petitioner will produce a copy of the order along with a copy of the writ petition before 2 the second respondent and will also serve one copy each on the private respondent. 2. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 24th May, 2011 ( Justice Sanjay Karol ), (c/rana) Judge.