1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8605 OF 2008 IN MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 12086 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 105 OF 2006 (Ramkorbai Chatarsingh Suradkar and others .v. State of Maharashtra) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri S.U. Nemade, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Y.B. Mandpe, AGP for the respondent. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. 24TH FEBRUARY, 2009. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. This is an application for condonation of delay. The delay is of 31 days and the reasons are at para No. 3. Because of the illness of the attorney holder, the applicant was unable to remove the office objections. The learned AGP for the respondent has no objection. In the interest of justice, the delay is condoned and the application is allowed. MCA (ST) NO. 12086 OF 2008 The learned Counsel for the applicants submits that because of the non compliance of the 2 conditional order, the First Appeal No. 105 of 2006 came to be dismissed. The office objection was in respect of filing of the paper book. The learned Counsel for the applicants further submits that the paper book is ready. He further submits that as the appellants/applicants are residing at remote place and the learned Counsel was unable to establish the contact with the applicants to seek necessary instructions, it resulted into non compliance of the conditional order. The grounds of the inability are at para Nos.3 and 4 of the application. Learned AGP has no objection. In my opinion, in the interest of justice, it is appropriate to allow the application and the same is allowed. Learned Counsel for the applicants undertakes to file paper book within a period of three days i.e. by 27th February, 2009 and to supply the copy of the paper book to learned AGP forthwith. JUDGE *rrg.