IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr.M.P (M.) No. 407 of 2010. Date of Decision: 26.05.2010 __________________________________________________________ Nomeshwer. ….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh. ….Respondent. ___________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the Petitioner: Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. __________________________________________________________ Dev Darshan Sud, J. The learned Assistant Advocate General submits on the instructions received from Inspector Swroop Kumar, Investigating Officer, that the petitioner is joining in the investigation, as such his custodial interrogation is not required at this stage. This application is according allowed on the following conditions:- (i) That the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called for by the police. 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2 (ii) The petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence, try to overawe the witnesses or threaten them in any manner. (iii) He shall not abscond from the jurisdiction of the learned Sessions Judge, Mandi. He shall appear in the Court on each and every date of hearing. (iv) The petitioner shall furnish bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of arresting officer. 2. This order shall be valid till the time when the challan is put up in the court, where after petitioner is free to apply for bail before the Court. Dasti copy on usual terms. May 26, 2010 (Dev Darshan Sud), (KRS) Judge