EN TkE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR w.P.No. 9.70 0 (2001 FETITIONER :M/s Mahendra Steels, A Propri’etership concern, through i£“s Proggzétor i5hwer Chandra Agarwal. S/o LateShri B.D.Agarwala hagevd about 54 years R/o 300, Samta Colony, Raipur . - VerSus - z la Asisistant Commissioner(P) Central Excise Head Quarters, Central Revenue Building Civil Lines, Raipur. 2. Customs, Excise ana Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, through its 1 Registrar . WWLE 226/227 or THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. FOR LSSUANCE OF A ‘ SUITABLE NRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION. HIGH COURIOEGHHATTlsGARH AT BILASPUR " WRIT PETITION NO. 2100 OF 2001 Petitioner Mls. Mahendra Steels Versus mm I _ I. AssistantCGmmissionef& V Another ‘ WRIT PETITION UNDER'ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon’ble Mr. Salish iQ Agnihotri, J.) Present :- Shri V.R,Tiwari,Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panei Lawyer for the State. «g V (Passed en ORgR 18 day af §D§&) November, 2010) ‘f‘lv Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits‘that with the passage of time, the petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side does not oontrovert the above submission. 3. In View of the above; the writ petition is dismissed, as having \ edl‘ : Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ' 7, .....,,,,, 7 become infructuous.