m THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsGARH AT BILASPUR M.c.c. No. g 6 12005 $§ngk €39wée§u oi Aged about 24 y6ars, , w, * R/oL Village Kosir, Tehsilr Sarangarh, )y f O} iDistrict— Rajgarh (C.G.) A‘ \W ORDER RULE C.P.C. A DDT ‘I’f‘ AT'I' >/ APPLICANT : f Santoshi Jaisawal, W/o. $hri Rakesh Kumar’Jaisawal’, Aged about 22 years, R/o. Present Address Village Boirdadar. Tehsil Rajgarh, DistriCI Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT : / Rakesh Kumar Jaisawal, ./_ § S/o. Ganesh Prasad Jaisawal, XI—HC-22 Wm mam. mmwm ' E‘W‘adww .. 3‘3 daR', ‘ mm 0311112006 Shri Sunil Otwani, learned counsel for the applicant. None for non-applicanl (served). Heard. I appellant Taking assigned into considera‘on in the apJication the duly reasons supported for non-appearance with an affidavit, of it the is proved that the appellant was prevented by suflicient cause trom appearing when the appeal as called. Therefore, M.C.C.No.86f2005 is allowed and the appeal beari F.A.No.91/2004 is readmitted foyaring. A copy of this order be vept in F.A.No.91il2£04_.j: A i sw- Vijay Kumar Shrivastava Judge Raju . (who W)