IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26032 of 2009 COLLECTOR YADAV, son of late Bulkan Yadav, village Barhauna, P.S. Shakurabad, District Jehanabad Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 1.9.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. Assuming everything to be in favour of the petitioner it remains a fact that the allegation made in the F.I.R. gets some sort of corroboration in form of injury though the Medical Officer has tried to give leeway as far as possible. None-the-less there is a substantive case under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner and he has remained in custody for only a period of nearly three months. That being so, this Court would direct the trial court to ensure that the trial against the petitioner is taken up out of turn and is completed within a period of six months and in the event such trial is not completed within the aforementioned period the petitioner may move the trial court again for bail and if the trial court would find that the petitioner is not found responsible for delaying conclusion of the 2 trial it would admit the petitioner on bail. With the aforementioned observations, this application is rejected for the present. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/