IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35030 of 2009 1. DAROGI MEHTA SON OF TANUK LAL MEHTA. 2. SINGHESHWAR MEHTA, SON OF SITARAM MEHTA BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAJGANJ, TARHA TOLA, P.S. BIHARIGANJ, DISTT.MADHEPURA. ------ PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14/12/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been made accused only on the basis of suspicion. It is stated that the petitioners were not involved in the murder rather the informant, who was herself a lady of easy virtue, managed the murder of her husband. The ground aforesaid may be a good ground for grant of regular bail. However, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. S.Ali (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)