IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.12286 of 2011 Dr.Santosh Bansal ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.N.K.Malhotra, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner was paid C.P.F. for the period she remained on probation. The petitioner had made representation to permit her to deposit C.P.F. to count this period towards her pensionary service. Grievance is that this representation is pending and is not being decided. Without going into the merits of the controversy, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner preferably within a period three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. July 15, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE