IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3436 of 2007 Date of Decision 25.03.2009 Parshan Singh ......Petitioner VERSUS Kuljit Kaur ......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: None for the petitioner. Mr.G.S.Sandhawalia, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL): The petitioner has sought this Court to exercise its powers under under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 16.12.2006 passed by Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kapurthala and the judgment dated 12.03.2007, passed by Distt. Judge, Kapurthala, whereby the petitioner-defendant (herein referred as 'the petitioner) has been restrained from reconstructing or demolishing the alleged common wall. Both the Courts below have observed that prima facie the wall could not be tempered or demolished without the consent of the plaintiff- respondent (herein referred to 'the respondent). Balance of convenience certainly lies in favour of the respondent. Hence, no grounds to interfere. Dismissed. Copy of the order be sent to the trial Court for information. March 25, 2009 (A.N.JINDAL) mamta-II JUDGE