CWP No. 17268 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION: 24.9.2010 Deepa ...Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana & Others …Respondents CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI PRESENT: Mr.Ajit Malik, Advocate for the petitioner Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.RD Sharma, DAG, Haryana who is present in Court has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondent no.1 and Mr.Ajay Nara, Advocate has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents no.2 to 4. Keeping in view the prayer made and with the consent of the counsel, this petition is disposed of at motion stage. The land of the petitioner comprised in Khewat No.571/680 situated within the revenue Estate of Village Risalu, Tehsil and District Panipat was acquired by the Government vide award dated 11.4.2002 for development of Sector 29, Part II, Panipat as an industrial sector. Respondents have CWP No. 17268 of 2010 2 issued Oustees Policy for allotment of residential/commercial plots to the land owners whose land was acquired. The petitioner applied for allotment of plot. When the claim of the petitioner was not considered, representation dated 12.2.2007 (Annexure P-9) was made which has been followed by legal notice dated 28.8.2007 (Annexure P-10), but no decision has been taken thereon. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the respondents are directed to consider the legal notice and take a decision thereon. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take a decision on the legal notice (Annexure P-10) within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is furnished to the competent authority. Needless to say, in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, it shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 24.9. 2010 MFK