THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 8293 OF 2010 Dated 15th April, 2010 Between: Awazi Kumara Swamy …Petitioner And Patil Veerabhadra Goud and three others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Devineni Vijay Kumar Counsel for respondents 2 to 4: AGP for Home The Court made the following ORDER: In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.2 has been unduly interfering with his right to enjoy the land with respect to which, he had dispute with respondent No.1. The petitioner specifically pleaded that in connection with the dispute over an extent of Acs.12.68 cents in Survey No.163B of Palthur Revenue Village, respondent No.1 filed O.S.No.87 of 2001 in the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Uravakonda, for permanent injunction against him and others and that the said suit was dismissed in favour of the petitioner on 17.02.2009. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite dismissal of the said suit, respondent No.1 prevailed over respondent No.2, who has been preventing him from entering the land and enjoying the same. The petitioner is stated to have made representation dated 29.03.2010 to respondent No.4, wherein he has specifically referred to the undue interference by respondent No.2 with his right to enjoy the property. Feeling aggrieved by the inaction of respondent No.4 in responding to the said representation made by the petitioner, the present writ petition is filed. When a grievance is made against his subordinate officers, it is the bounden duty of respondent No.4 to make an immediate response thereto and take appropriate action against the erring officers if the allegations are found correct. Therefore respondent No.4 is directed to enquire into the representation made by the petitioner by summoning him and recording his statement. If respondent No.4 finds truth in the allegations made by the petitioner, he shall protect the interests of the petitioner apart from initiating appropriate action against respondent No.2. Subject to the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP No10687 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 15th April, 2010 Note: Issue C.C in one week vrn