1 cp16-11.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO.16 OF 2011 Times Innovative Media Limited .. Petitioner Versus Naaptol Online Shopping Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent Ms.Priyanka Master i/b. Halai & Co. for petitioner Mr.Vyapak Desai i/b. N.Desai Associates for respondent CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 22nd December 2011. P.C.: 1] It is stated that this is a company petition which is admitted. However, post admission the claim of the petitioner has been settled by the respondent company to its satisfaction and, therefore, the petitioner does not wish to press this petition. On the earlier occasion when this statement was made, considering the fact that the petition was admitted, the parties were directed to comply with the mandate of the Rules and insert such advertisement as is permissible thereunder, inviting claims and objections from third parties, who wish to substitute themselves as petitioner. The affidavit of publication is filed and the 2 cp16-11.doc same indicates that the notice of proposed withdrawal was duly published in daily “Maharashtra Times” dated 29th November 2011 and “Free Press Journal” dated 30th November 2011. Having perused this affidavit and the advertisement, I am satisfied that compliance is made with the rules, enabling withdrawal of company petition, which is admitted and advertised. 2] In such circumstances, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn, when no claims or objections are received nor is any creditor or contributory is present before this Court, in pursuance of the public notice and dismissed as such. No costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)