IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8569 of 2008 ANARUL HAQUE Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 9.7.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. Reference may be made to the earlier order of this Court dated 16.5.2008. Pursuant thereto, Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not in a position to settle the dispute inasmuch as the demand of Rs. two lacs as being made by the opposite party is wholly exorbitant. He further denies that the male child allegedly borne to the opposite party no.2 actually belongs to the petitioner. This Court on being assured earlier by the learned senior counsel as recorded in the order dated 16.5.2008 had expected that the whole dispute will come to an end and the life of a young victim girl would be saved. When this is not possible, the law must take its own course. Consequently, the petitioner being accused for an offence under Section 376 and other allied offences under Indian Penal Code is not entitled for being released on bail and his provisional bail granted by the order dated 16.5.2008 would stand cancelled after expiry of a period of eight weeks and thereafter, the petitioner must surrender failing which he will be taken into custody by the Superintendent of Police. With the aforementioned observations/directions, this application is dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)