... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4633 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.4633 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.4633 OF 2005 IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.1935 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.1935 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.1935 OF 2005 ...................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ...................................................... Mr R.K. Mendadkar for the Appellant. Mr J.J. Xavier for the B.M.C. Mr M.K. Shukla for the Respondent No.4. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. : A.S. OKA, J. : A.S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 13, 2006. : MARCH 13, 2006. : MARCH 13, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Rule. Respondents waives service. Considering the findings recorded by the Trial Court and the Policy of the Respondent No.1-Corporation regarding protecting mezzenine floors and lofts, the suit structure cannot be demolished during the pendency of the First Appeal. 2. Hence, it is directed that till the final disposal of the First Appeal, the parties to the Appeal will maintain status-quo in all respects as of today in respect of the suit structure. 3. The Civil Application is disposed of in above terms with no orders as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE