SINGLE BENCH' ^^?^~. ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fa No. °>'oo<2^' /2011 PETITIONER <^3W^' >.&»••*' AaW" RESPONDENTS / Nanak chand Agrawal, S/o Late Tarachand Agrawal, Age- 59 years, R/o - Jutemill Raigarh, Tah & Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS ^l. Municipal Corporation Raigarh,Through- Its Comissioner, Municipal Corporation Office, Raigarh Distt- Raigarh (C.G.) -.2. The Collector, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA ..'. ..-.'~So%ifk,. -u.-ik wfSSs^' l "^..J/ li^ ':tr^/^ ssss&^ k HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILA8PUR PETmONER WMT PETmON (C) No. 3602 of2011 Nanak Chaad Agrawal. RE8PONDENT8 VERSUS Municipal Corpta-ation, Raigarh & Anotiier. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OFINDIA SB: Hon'ble Sahri Satish K. Aearihotri, J. Present: Shri Anut Shanna, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri H-B.Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Smt. Meera Jaiswal, AdvocateforlfaerespondentNo. 1. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Faael Lawyerforthe State/respondent No.2. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on I4U1 day ofJufy, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for Ihe petitioner submits that the petitioner has not received any aotice in respect of tiie petition scheduled land, however, Ifae proeess of demolition has already taken place by the respondent No. 1. 2. At tfais juncture, Shri Agrawal, leamed senior counsel appearing with Snrt. Jaiswal, for the respondent No. 1 and Shri Bhaduri, leamed Panel Lawyer appearing for tfae State/respondent No. 2 suhmit that no demoUtion on the part ofthe respondeat authMiti^ shall be taken without foUowing Ae due process oflaw. 3. fa view ofthe above, accordmg to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication at thisstage. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of ^~~~ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Anrit