IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28168 of 2008 NAVIN BHARTI @ MOLHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.38676 of 2008 PANJAH KUMAR @ PANKAJ SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 18.12.2008 Heard Sri Sanjeev Verma, Advocate for the petitioner Navin Bharti @ Molha, Sri Satish Chandra, Advocate for the petitioner Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Singh and the learned A.P.P. for the State. None is named in the FIR. As may appear from the subsequent material collected in the case diary, some witnesses have claimed that they saw the petitioners or either of them taking away the deceased after awaking him from sleep. The contention is that if those witnesses had really seen the occurrence, as they claim to have, then the name of the petitioners ought to have appeared in the FIR. Let the above named two petitioners in the two petitions be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Begusarai in Cheriya Bariyarpur P.S.Case No.167 of 2007. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )