WIRE AT PARTY’S COSTS TO 1. THE COMMISSIONER, GHMC, HYDERABAD 2. THE DY. COMMISSIONER, GHMC, HYDERABAD-1 3. THE ASSISTANT CITY PLANNER, CIRCLE NO.10, GHMC, HYDERABAD-1 BY ORDER OF HIGH COURT DATED 17-08-2009 IN W.P.NO. 16957 OF 2009 FILED BY THE PETITIONER VIZ SRI K. BHASKAR RAO. WHILE ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION AND SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 13-08-2009 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT- CORPORATION UNDER SECTION 636 OF THE ACT. NOW THAT THE RESPONDENT-CORPORATION HAS ISSUED NOTICE TO THE PETITIONER SECTION 452 OF THE ACT, HE IS DIRECTED TO SUBMIT HIS EXPLANATION, IF ANY, THERE TO, WITHIN A PERIOD OF TEN DAYS FROM TODAY. ON THE PETITIONER SUBMITTING HIS EXPLANATION, THE RESPONDENT-CORPORATION SHALL CONSIDER THE SAME AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS THEREON, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. TILL SUCH EXERCISE IS UNDERTAKEN, BOTH THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO MAINTAIN STATUS QUO OBTAINING AS ON TODAY ORDER FOLLOWS HIGH COURT W.P.NO. 16957 OF 2009 For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR-