THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO.27818 OF 2005 Date:17-02-2006 Between: Nirmal Development and Welfare Society …Petitioner And A.P.State Wakf Board and others …Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO.27818 OF 2005 O R D E R (Per the Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, J): The writ petition, in our view, has become infructuous, in view of the order passed by the first respondent canceling the lease. However, during the hearing of the case, certain observations might have been made by this Court and in the order now passed by the first respondent, a reference has been made to them, which in our view is not fair. The learned Advocate appearing for the Wakf Board assures that an amended order will be passed and reference to the observations of this Court shall be deleted. During the hearing of this matter, we have received a letter allegedly from respondent No.3. This letter was ordered to be placed on file and was shown to the learned Senior Advocate appearing for respondent No.3 at the time of last hearing. Today, respondent No.3 is present, but denies having written such a letter. In this view of the matter, no further action is necessary against respondent No.3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. However, if respondent No.3 is aggrieved of the order of cancellation of lease, he may seek appropriate remedies available to him in law. No order as to costs. WPMP No.3204 of 2006 and WPMP (SR) No.13649 of 2006: No orders are necessary to be passed in the implead petition, which is accordingly dismissed. Since the writ petition itself has been disposed of, if the petitioner/third party has any grievance, he is at liberty to file a separate writ petition. _____________________ (Bilal Nazki, J) 17th February, 2006 _____________________ (G.Chandraiah, J) vrn