IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2045 of 2006 Between: Bandaru Rama Rao ..... PETITIONER(S) AND Sri Brahmarambha Malleswara Swamy Temple .....RESPONDENT(S) HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2045 of 2006 ORDER: Petitioner, who is the judgment debtor, files this revision under Section 115 C.P.C. inter alia seeking to assail the correctness of the order of arrest passed in execution petition, which has been filed by the respondent-decree holder in pursuance of a decree for recovery of money. Heard both sides. Perused the material available on record. The chief affidavit of the respondent-decree holder filed before the Court below clearly shows that though the petitioner was having sufficient means to discharge the decreetal debt, he wantonly avoided to pay the same. So, the revision petition is devoid of merits and hence the same is liable to be dismissed. However, taking into consideration the submission that the petitioner has deposited half of the amount mentioned in the execution petition in compliance of the interim order of this Court dated 19.04.2006, he is permitted to deposit the balance amount within three months from today. It is made clear that in case of default the order of arrest passed by the Court below stands revived. Subject to the above observations, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J 15th July, 2010 CVRK