1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4477 OF 2008 (Prakash Madhavdas Heda vs. The Additional Collector, Nagpur & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DECEMBER 01, 2008. Heard in the background of the fact that Civil Suit, questioning the document of relinquishment, is already filed and pending vide Regular Civil Suit No. 1166 of 2008. Shri Mundra, learned counsel states that the relinquishment deed, on the basis of which name of the petitioner has been deleted, is an unregistered one and also he points out that when the petitioner purchased the property, he was placed in possession by present respondent No.4. Shri Mehta, learned counsel who appears for respondent No.4 is strongly objecting to this statement. Shri Kankale, learned AGP appears for respondents No. 1 to 3 supports the impugned order. It is apparent that the Civil Suit is pending in which the validity or otherwise of the entire 2 exercise has to be gone into and will be gone into by the Civil Court after the parties are given appropriate opportunity to place their side on record. The entries in revenue record and present mutation is not binding on Civil Court and cannot create hindrance while appreciating the facts of the matter. I, therefore, find that the petitioner is not prejudiced at least at present in any case by the impugned order. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. JUDGE *GS.