Crl.Misc.No.M-1263 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-1263 of 2010. Decided on: May 04, 2010. Karam Singh .. Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and others .. Respondents * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI * * * PRESENT Mr.A.S.Barnala, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Abhishek Chautala, AAG, Punjab. Mr.H.B.S.Baidwan, Advocate, for respondent Nos.5 to 8. M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) The petitioner through the instant Habeas Corpus petition seeks the production of his son Devinder Singh in the Court alleging that his daughter-in-law, Chhinder Kaur, has illegally detained the son of the petitioner claiming that his son is a simpleton person having been detained against his wishes. Pursuant to the orders passed by this Court Chhinder Kaur and Devinder Singh are present in the Court. I have examined Devinder Singh. He understands . . . 1 Crl.Misc.No.M-1263 of 2010 all the questions put to him. Despite being his simpleton nature, he has been able to answer all the questions. He has told that he has come to the Court with his wife Chhinder Kaur. He on asking of the Court informs that he has got two children out of marriage. Chhinder Kaur is also present in the Court. I am satisfied that he has not been illegally detained by Chhinder Kaur as alleged by the petitioner. Report Annexure R1, prepared by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bagha Purana, has been placed on record. In the said report on the basis of enquiry, it has been observed that Karam Singh has transferred his land to his son Devinder Singh voluntarily and Devinder Singh has further transferred the same to his wife Chhinder Kaur. Chhinder Kaur has sold land measuring two acres and remaining one acre has been given on lease to Nachhatar Singh which is in his cultivating possession. It is apparent that the present petition has been filed without there being any basis. It is absolutely an abuse of process of the Court. The petition is dismissed with a costs of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only). However, dismissal of this petition will not prejudice the rights of the petitioner to avail any other remedy available to him. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE May 04, 2010. rka . . . 2