In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R.F.A. No. 1875 of 2004 (O&M) Krishan Pal and another ....... Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh ....... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. P. C. Dhiman, Advocate, for the appellants. None for the respondent. Rajesh Bindal J. The landowners are in appeal before this court against the award of the learned court below under the Land Acquisition Act, 1984 (for short, “the Act”) seeking further enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts of the case are that Chandigarh Administration vide notification dated 20.8.1998, issued under Section 4 of the Act, acquired land forming part of the revenue estate of villages Nizampur Burail, Nizampur Kumbra and Kajheri for development of third phase of Chandigarh. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, `the Collector') assessed the market value of the acquired land of different villages and different rates. The land owners feeling dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Collector, filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below assessed the value of the acquired land at Rs. 13,44,000/- per acre. It is this award which is impugned in the present appeal. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the issue involved in the present appeal is covered by judgment of this Court in R.F.A.No. 3921 of 2007 –Arunash Chander Kaushik and others v. Union Territory, Chandigarh, decided on 10.2.2009, whereby the amount of compensation was further enhanced. No other issue was raised. No one has appeared for the respondent. A perusal of aforesaid judgment shows that issue dealt with therein was regarding determination of fair value of the land acquired vide same notification dated 20.8.1998. Accordingly, for the reasons recorded in Arunash Chander Kaushik's case (supra), the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms. 4.5.2010 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge