HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.18260 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.12.2011 **** Parmjit Kaur . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Anr. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. AS Manaise, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG Punjab **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner seeks quashing of the result of TET Paper-II conducted by respondents on the premise that some of the answers incorporated in the ‘key’ were wrong. The petitioner, in the alternative, seeks grant of 3 grace marks in lieu of 3 incorrect questions thereby declaring him as qualified/passed. (2). Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the issue raised in the present writ petition stands answered against the petitioner by this Court in CWP No.15976 of 2011 (Anupama Gulati & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.) decided on 13.10.2011. (3). The writ petition stands dismissed in the light of order passed in Anupama Gulati’s case (supra). (4). Dasti . CWP No.18260 of 2011.doc - 2 – 16.12.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge 2