:1: I IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH, 2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MORAN REDDY R.F.A. No.722 OF 2005 BETWEEN: I. CHANDRAGOUDA YALLAPPAGOUDA MUDIGOUDRA, AGED 31 YEARS, RIO KUMBAR ONI, NAVALGUND, NAVALGUND TALUK, DISTRICT: DHARWAD-582 208. APPELLANT. (BY SRI. J S SHErrY, ADV.) AND I. SHANKRAPPA 5/0 BASAPPA CHAVADI, RIO NAVALOUND, NAVALGUND TALUK, DISt: DHARWAD-582 208. 2. SIDDAUNGESHWARAGOUDA YALLAPPAGOUDA MUDIGOUDRA, AGE: 22 YEARS, RIO KUMBAR ONI, NAVALGUND, NAVALGUND TALUK, DIST.: DHARWAD-582 208. RESPONDENTS. (BY SRI: S S PATIL & SRI. SHRIKANTH B ADVS. FOR R. 1 SRI. S.Y MUDIGOUDRA, R.2 SERVED)b THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 90 CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT A’JD DECREE DATED:15J22004 PASSED IN OSNO. 155/2001 ON T.Hi..• PILE OP THE I ADDLCIVIL JUDGE (SRDN) & DHARWAD, PARTLY DECREEING TIlE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION. THIS DAY, THE COURT DELPv 1 ERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Sri. J.S. Shettv, learned counsel for the appellant files a memo stating that the matter is settled between the parties outside the Court and seeks leave to dismiss the appe and direct refund of half court fee. Memo is taken on record. Appeal is dismissed without refund of Court fee since the retpondents’ counsel submits that there is no agreement of settlement between. the parties. JUDGE