BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD)No.16072 of 2011 R.MANIKANDAN :PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.6 -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI DISTRICT. (CR.NO.83 OF 2011) :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.MOHANASUNDARAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 120(b), 419, 468, 471 and 420 I.P.C in Crime No.83 of 2011 on the file file of the respondent police and seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been arrayed as A6 and he has been implicated on the allegation that A2 said to have fabricated the document and the petitioner alleged to have stood as a witness in the power of attorney document. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. 3.Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner has been arrayed as A6 and he has been implicated for signing the document as an attestor in respect of the fabrication of power of attorney document. 4.The fact remains that the main allegation of fabrication of document made against the other accused and as far as the petitioner is concerned, he has been alleged to have stood as an attestor. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Judicial Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 5.30 p.m. for a period of four weeks and thereafter, he shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Judicial Magistrate No:I, Madurai 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District. +1CC to M/S. M.MOHANASUNDARAM Advocate SR.No.44745. RP/21.12.2011/1P/6C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16072 of 2011,Date:19/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/