IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39791 of 2010 BINAY YADAV, S/o Ragho Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 01.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 384 and 386/34 IPC, Section 25(1-B) A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, Sections 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act and Section 17 of the Cr. Law Amendment Act. By order dated 07.11.2009 and 19.03.2010 vide Cr. Misc. Nos. 31071 of 2009 and 9866 of 2010 the petitioner was refused bail twice considering that explosive substances were recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he has criminal antecedent, I am not inclined to review the said order. The application is once again rejected with a direction to the Trial Court to conclude the trial within a period of six months in view of the serious nature of the offence. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)