Crl.Misc.No.M-34494 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-34494 of 2008. Decided on: September 07, 2009. Gurbachan Singh .. Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and another .. Respondents * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT Mr.R.S.Bains, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.N.S.Pawar, Additional A.G., Punjab. M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner along with Raghbir Singh and Boota Singh has been arrayed as accused in a complaint case under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, pertaining to the same incident regarding murder of Jaswinder Kaur wife of Jaswant Singh. FIR was registered by Jaswant Singh and Labh Singh, husband and father-in-law of the deceased alleging that on investigation of the police it was found that Labh Singh and Jaswant Singh had actually committed the offence and that they were responsible for the murder of Jaswinder Kaur. The case lodged by Labh Singh and Jaswant . . . 1 Crl.Misc.No.M-34494 of 2008 Singh was found to be false. They preferred a private complaint contending that Jaswinder Kaur had been kidnapped by Lala Singh, Zore Singh, Kuldeep Singh, Kesar Singh and Rajinder Singh. Complainant Mohan Singh came out with a third version regarding the occurrence. The petitioner along with Raghbir Singh and Boota Singh has been summoned in the said complaint. Vide orders passed in Crl.Misc.No.34252 and 34255 of 2008, both the co- accused of the petitioner have been granted concession of pre-arrest bail in the private complaint. The petitioner pursuant to the interim order dated 29.12.2008, has been appearing before the summoning Court as well as before the trial Court after commitment, as such, he can also be granted the same relief as has been granted to his co- accused. The petition is allowed. The interim order dated 29.12.2008, is hereby confirmed. The petitioner will remain on bail during pendency of the private complaint filed by Mohan Singh subject to the conditions that he will not absent himself without sufficient cause and will not tamper or hamper the further proceedings of trial. In case of any such eventuality, it will be open to the trial Court to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE September 07, 2009. rka . . . 2