IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1285 of 2011 RAM PUKAR RAI SON OF LATE MATUK RAI RESIDNET OF VILAGE ANE, P.O. TARALAHI, P.S. BAHADURPUR, DARBHANGA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2 27/06/2011 The so called impugned order which is a speaking order contained in annexure-10 has been rendered by the Principal Secretary, Finance on the earlier direction issued by the High Court when the petitioner moved the High Court in C.W.J.C. No. 17336 of 2010. A long narration to the background to the dispute has been rendered by the Principal Secretary but all that aspect is not required to be looked into by this Court at this stage in view of the fact that the earlier decision rendered by the learned Single Judge has not attained finality and the matter is still under consideration of a Division Bench and also the Apex Court with regard to the interim order in this regard. Principal Secretary has not rejected the claim of the petitioner outright. He has only opined that it will be in the interest of things to wait a final decision in C.W.J.C. No. 6751 of 2007 or may be a decision of the Division - 2 - Bench. If that be so, then no interference is warranted with annexure-10 at this stage. Petitioner would be well advised to approach the respondents or the Court as the case may be, when a final opinion is rendered in L.P.A. No. 688 of 2006. This writ application is disposed of with the observation aforesaid. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)