In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … COCP No. 640 of 2009 Date of decision: August 11, 2009 Dev Raj Bainsla son of Shiv Narain ..Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr. R.B.Garg,Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Jindal, Addl.A.G.Haryana for the respondents. ,,, Rakesh Kumar Garg,J(Oral) In response to the show cause notice issued by this Court, reply has been filed on behalf of respondent no.2 wherein it has been submitted that in compliance of the orders passed by this court, order (Annexure R-1) has been passed in the case of the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner does not dispute this fact. However, he states that the petitioner be given liberty to challenge the aforesaid order in accordance with law. With the aforesaid liberty, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. August 11, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE