IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2008 / 14TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 16651 of 2008(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: PETITIONER ---------------------- BINDU.K.S, OPTHALMIC ASSISTANT, GRADE-I, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTER, KONNY. BY ADV. SRI.T.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, HEALTH DIRECTORATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTER, KONNY. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.R.SREELATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M. JOSEPH, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 16651 OF 2008 G ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 4th day of June, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner calls in question Ext.P3. Ext.P3 is a proceedings dated 27.5.2008 by the 2nd respondent ordering general transfer. Petitioner is serial No.59 in the said proceedings. She is transferred from Primary Health Centre, Konni to Taluk Head Quarters Hospital, Chalakudy. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner has already preferred Ext.P5 representation before the 1st respondent. 2. I heard the learned Government Pleader also. He points out that the petitioner should have filed Ext.P5 representation before the 2nd respondent. There is no case of malafides as such. I do not find any good ground to interfere with the impugned order under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner has already filed Ext.P5 before the 1st respondent. In such circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of as follows. WPC.16651/08 : 2 : 3. The 1st respondent will make over Ext.P5 representation to the 2nd respondent within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Upon receipt of Ext.P5 representation, the 2nd respondent will treat it as a representation addressed to him and take a decision thereon in accordance with law, within two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation from the 1st respondent. Sd/- (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) aks /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE