HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.4359 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.03.2011 **** Inderjit . . . . Petitioner VS. The Pepsu Road Transport Corporation & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner, who retired from service w.e.f 31.07.2000 on attaining the age of superannuation, seeks a mandamus to direct the respondent-Corporation to grant him pension and other retiral benefits/dues in terms of the Pepsu Road Transport Corporation Employees Pension/Gratuity and General Provident Fund Regulations, 1992. (2). This Court vide order dated 03.03.2011 passed in CWP No.19084 of 2009 titled as Malkiat Singh & Anr. v. Pepsu Road Transport Corporation & Ors. and other connected writ petitions, keeping in view the financial crunch being faced by the Corporation, has set out some specific time-frame for payment of the retiral dues etc. to the writ petitioners, apart from other directions, which shall be equally applicable in the present case as well. (3). The writ petition is, thus, disposed of in terms of Malkiat Singh’s case (supra). (4). Dasti . 10.03.2011 Vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge