1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 7 OF 2009 AND CRI. APPLICATION NO. 2 OF 2009 The Secretary, Smt. Ramdulari Brujrajnath Tiwari Sanskruik Kendra ...Petitioner Versus Chandramani Devraj Tiwari & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. C.K. Thomas for the Petitioner Respondent No. 1, in person, present Mrs. P.H. Kantharia, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: AUGUST 26, 2009 P.C.:- This Contempt Petition has been filed against the first respondent for initiating contempt against him for writing a letter dated 28th January, 2008 to the learned Chief Justice. This letter was also an annexure to a Review Petition filed by the present first respondent, being Review Petition No. 5 of 2008 in 2 Letters Patent Appeal No. 156 of 2003. The Court dismissed the Review Petition with the following observations:- “4. This is a mischievous application for review only to malign the Judges of the Court and the petitioner wants to blackmail and get the order passed in his favour. We are restraining ourselves from proceeding in contempt against the petitioner for the reason that Court always shows restraint in dealing with such behaviour. We hope that the petitioner will not indulge in such gimmicks in future.” 2. Since we have already earlier declined to take action against the respondent for contempt on same grounds, initiation of contempt now would not be appropriate. It is not alleged that after the orders in Review Petition, any act which can be considered contemptuous was made by the first respondent. The Contempt Petition is dismissed. 3. Consequently, Criminal Application No. 2 of 2009 is also dismissed. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J.