1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Second Bail Application No. 3519/2010 Prahlad Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 14.5.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr SR Surana - for the petitioner Mr Piyush Kumar, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that main allegations exist against Smt Vimlesh who has been granted bail by the coordinate Bench so as other co-accused. Case of the petitioner is not distinguishable to that of other co-accused more so when substantial charge has been framed against Vimlesh. Thus, petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Otherwise also, he would face the trial. 2 On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After considering the rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and it is directed that petitioner namely, Prahlad may be released on bail under Section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 242/2009 registered at Police Station – Sadar, Hindaun District – Karauli for offence under Section 302/149, 147, 323, 341 IPC provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- together with one local surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma