THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3494 OF 2011 Date: 24-08-2011 Between V. Reddy Hussain …..Petitioner And Perala Madhava Reddy …..Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3494 OF 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against order dated 15- 07-2011 in O.E.P No.157 of 2010 in O.S. No.384 of 2008 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati, whereby and whereunder the Execution Petition to order attachment of salary of the petitioner - judgment debtor for realisation of the decretal amount was allowed attaching salary of the petitioner at the rate of Rs.4,000/- per month. 2. The petitioner is the judgment debtor. The respondent is the decree holder. The respondent filed the aforementioned O.E.P. under Order 21 Rule 48 of C.P.C. before the Executing Court seeking attachment of salary of the petitioner-judgment debtor. The Executing Court, by the impugned order allowed the said application. Hence, the petitioner filed the present revision petition. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner is drawing a net salary of Rs.6,301/- per month and, therefore, the Executing Court ought not to have attached his salary to the extent of Rs.4,000/- per month. He further contended that application to set aside the ex parte decree is pending and without deciding the same, attachment is ordered. Therefore, he prays to set aside the impugned order. 4. As seen from the record, it is clear that the petitioner was drawing a net salary of Rs.18,680/- per month. It is not in dispute that the amount of Rs.8,000/- which is being deducted towards bank loan, is a non-government deduction and does not come under standard deductions. Thus, it can be said that the petitioner is getting a net salary of Rs.18,680/- per month. In such a case, attachment to the extent of Rs.4,000/- per month from his salary cannot be said to be contrary to Section 60 of C.P.C. Therefore, the impugned order needs no interference by this Court. 5. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file an application before the trial Court as per law to raise the attachment. No costs. K.C. BHANU, J 24-08-2011 ks