1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5090 OF 2000 Smt Meena Bindurao Kulkarni and ors .. Petitioners. -versus Vyayam Mandal, Satara & ors .. Respondents Mr.Kirankumar Pakhade, i/nb S. S. Pakale, for the Petitioners Mr Vivek Salunke i/b P. B. Shah, for the respondent Nos l & 2. Mr. S. D. Rayrikar, AGP for the respondent No.6. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED: 1st April, 2010 P.C. 1. The challenge is made to the order dated 15.3.2000, passed by the Presiding Officer, Shivaji University and College Tribunal and College Tribunal, Pune, whereby while dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant, permitted them to approach the Grievance Committee of Shivaji University under section 57 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, l994 or any other appropriate forum for claim of their relief about full compensation, gratuity, Provident Fund, Pension and other benefits. 2. While admitting the petition on 25.9.2000, this Court refused to grant interim relief. 2 3. Admittedly the respondent No.4 Shivaji University, requested the Government of Maharashtra to grant permission to close college under section 92 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, l994. Statement is made that the permission/approval was granted and accordingly the College is closed since l998. Therefore, even on that ground it is difficult to accept that the termination order so passed is illegal or bad in law. 4. Even otherwise while college is closed after getting approval and as liberty/permission was already granted to the appellants to raise their grievances before the Committee. 5. In view of the above, without observing anything further I see there is no reason to interfere with the order already passed. The petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule discharged. No costs. ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)