Rng Rng Rng IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.842 OF 1983 and SUIT NO.2910 NO.842 OF 1983 and SUIT NO.2910 NO.842 OF 1983 and SUIT NO.2910 OF OF OF 1984 1984 1984 Hansraj K.Nakra & anr ... Plaintiffs Vs. B.L.Khandelwal ... Defendant Mr.Subodh Joshi i/b J.K.Majithia for Plaintiff None for Defendant CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.V.NIRGUDE, J : A.V.NIRGUDE, J : A.V.NIRGUDE, J DATE DATE DATE : 31ST JULY, 2008 : 31ST JULY, 2008 : 31ST JULY, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Joshi for Plaintiff in Suit No.842/1983. None for defendants in Suit No.842/1983. None for Plaintiff in Suit No.2910/1984. R & P of Suit No.2910/1984 is missing. Mr.Joshi tells the Court that he is appearing for the defendant in Suit No.2910/1984. He also tells me that the Plaintiff in Suit No.2910/1984 has not been attending the case although on three occasions, the case was listed on board. In any case, the plaintiff and his advocate in Suit No.2910/1984 should have attended the case. They should have attended the Court today. In view of their absence, I think that Suit No.2910/1984 deserves to be dismissed for default. In view of the dismissal, Mr.Joshi does 2 not press Suit No.842/1983. It is also dismissed as not pressed. Plaintiff in Suit No.842/1983 is given liberty to revive Suit No.2910/1984 and is restored to file. Mr.Joshi agreed to inform about this developemnt to Mr.Sakhalkar advocate for other side. { A.V.Nirgude, J } A.V.Nirgude, J } A.V.Nirgude, J }