1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 1170 of 2010 (Laxmi Jwellers, Karanja and another -: versus :- Shwetanbar Jain Mandir) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : MARCH 18, 2010. Heard Mr. P.A.Gode, learned Advocate for the petitioner. In the suit for removal of encroachment, after completion of his cross-examination, the petitioner/plaintiff wanted to place on record the plaint map and also wanted to correct the four boundaries of the suit property. The trial court has, for the reasons recorded, rejected that prayer. The contention before me is the nature of the suit does not undergo any change and no prejudice is caused to the respondent/ defendant. Though, the nature of the suit may not undergo any change, the prejudice caused to the respondent/defendant is apparent. I am, therefore, not inclined to interfere in the matter in writ jurisdiction. However, looking to the nature of controversy, the petitioner/plaintiff is permitted to challenge the said order rejecting his prayer for placing the plaint map on record, after the final adjudication of the suit, if occasion therefor arises. Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE Diwale