1 APPW.139-2010 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 139 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 84 OF 2005 AND CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 85 OF 2005 Mrs. Margaret Fernandes w/o Mr. Joseph Luis Fernandes ...Applicant. Vs. M/s Vatsa Corporation Ltd. & Ors. .....Respondents. ----- Ms. Mona Malhotra, for the Applicant. Mr. Kiran Kulkarni a/w Mr. Mahesh Dixit for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. P.A. Pol, PP, for the State. Mr. N.D. Desai, C.A. For Respondent No.6. ---- CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D. SALVI, JJ. JUNE 21, 2011. P.C. 1 We have heard the learned Counsel for the applicant. 2 By our separate order passed today, we have disposed Criminal Writ Petition Nos.84 of 2005 and 85 of 2005. The applicant prays 2 APPW.139-2010 for directions for repayment of the deposit with interest based on the report submitted by the Commissioner. Similar prayer was made in Criminal Application No.107 of 2010 filed in Criminal Writ Petition No.84 of 2005 by another depositor and the applicant relied upon the order dated 6.10.2010 passed by this court in the said application. This court had directed the Registrar (Judicial) to consider the claim of the applicant on merits and pass appropriate orders. 3 In view of the fact that the Supreme Court, by it order dated 9.5.2011, has upheld the constitutional validity of the MPID Act, the proceedings in MPID Special Case No.9 of 2000 will commence for the trial and the applicant has to apply before the said court and the learned Special Judge is competent to consider her application on the basis of the Commissioner’s report. 4 Hence, the Criminal Application is disposed with liberty to the applicant to move an appropriate application in MPID Special Case No.9 of 2000. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.) 3 APPW.139-2010