IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29969 of 2010 INDAL MANJHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.08.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the state. It would appear from the F.I.R. that one country-made pistol was recovered beneath the bed of the petitioner whereas another country-made pistol was recovered from the roof of the house kept in a gunny bag. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the pistol which has been recovered beneath the bed of the petitioner is admittedly has not been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and so far as the second pistol is concerned, the same has not been found effective as mentioned by the I.O. in Paragraph-25 of the case diary which has been specifically asserted by the petitioner at Paragraph-9 of this bail petition. Although learned counsel appearing for the state opposed the prayer for bail but considering this aspect of the matter that petitioner is rotting in jail custody since 23.04.2010 without having any criminal antecedent as well as this aspect of the matter that 2 the recovery has not been made from conscious possession of the petitioner Indal Manjhi, I direct him to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Khizersarai P.S. Case No. 92 of 2010 to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Gaya. AKV/ (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)