cra2996.11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2996 OF 2011 Sanjay s/o Dayaram Dhongardive, Age-40 years, Occu:Business, R/o-Devnandini, Behind Bibika Makbara, Aurangabad. ...APPLICANT. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra. ...RESPONDENT. ... Shri.H.M. Salve Advocate for Applicant. Shri.S.G. Nandedkar, A.P.P. for Respondent. ... CORAM: T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATE : 21ST JULY, 2011 PER COURT : 1. This Application is filed for anticipatory bail in Crime No.I-82 of 2011 registered with Begampura police station, cra2996.11 2 Aurangabad, for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 324, 323, 504, 506, 143, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 25 of Indian Arms Act. The papers of the investigation were made available. Both the sides are heard. 2. Crime is registered on the basis of report given by one Prashant Zare. He has made allegations that he was contacted on his mobile phone and he was called near the gate of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad by Santosh Bhingare. He has made allegations that he went there with his friend Sunil More and there complainant and five other persons assaulted him. He has made allegations against Santosh Bhingare and Satish Bhingare that they used sharp weapons like sword and the blade used in hair cutting shop. The allegations are made that Applicant gave him feast and kick blows. cra2996.11 3 3. The injury certificate shows that one abrasion and CLW were found on the body of the complainant and all the three injuries are described as simple. The patient was however, referred to surgery and further treatment. The injuries were caused by hard and blunt object. The police papers show that Sagar Bhingare and Gagan Shinde are arrested but two main accused namely, Santosh Bhingare and Satish Bhingare are not yet arrested. The age of the Applicant is given as 40 years and it was submitted that he is a businessman and there is possibility that out of some previous enmity, he is falsely implicated. 4. In view of the nature of the allegations made against the Applicant, this Court holds that his custodial interrogation is not necessary. The interim relief granted by this Court by order dated 14th July 2011, is confirmed. The Applicant to appear before the Investigating Officer on every Sunday between 9 a.m. to 12 noon, for a cra2996.11 4 period of one month from today, for interrogation and he is to cooperate with the investigation. The Applicant is not to tamper with the prosecution witnesses and not to commit similar offence. Criminal Application is disposed of. [T.V. NALAWADE, J.] asb/JULY11