HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH A 1 BILASPUR PETITIONER WRTI* PET1TION (S) No. 4920 of2008 Akhileshwar Tiwari S/o Shri Amar Dev Tiwari, aged about 46 years, Assistatit Tea<dier, ft-iiiiary School, Parsagydi, Block Rajpur, Distt. Ambilsapur (C.G.) \7ERSUS RESPONDENT8 : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Seoretary Deparfanent of Education D.K.S. Bhawaii, Raipur 2. Director, Public iostmction Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur(C.G.) 3. District Educatioa Officer, Distt Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE €QN8TITUrnasiQFMDIA SB!Hoii»bleShriSattshK.A^n^ Preseiit: Shri A.S.Rajput^ Advocate forthe petitioiier. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govenanent Advocate forthe State/respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 08th day of September, 2008) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner; on iiistrucAion. subnAs tiiat the petitioner does not wairt to contest fhis matter on merit. However, fbe petitioirar be pemiitted to file ar^resentatioiabefbi^tiierespQi^ of fhe somejudgments passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court aadthis High Court. Shri Bhatia, leamed counsel appearing for 1he State/respond^ts submits that in fhe event, a representation is made, tiie sam6 shall be considered and cbcided in accordance with law, on its o^n merits, witfain a period offour weeks from tiie date ofreceipt offhe representation, In view of the clear and categorical statement made by leamed Deputy Goveniment Advocate, accordiag to Shri Rajput, leam^icwnselappearixigfar the petitioner,nothing survives inthis matter. Accordmgly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Axnit Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge