- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8687/2010 Akash s/o Ramesh Matade, age 30 yrs., occu.service as Staff Nurse, r/o Housing Board Society, DRT 15, Shivajinagar, Barshi Road, Beed. ...Petitioner.. Versus 1] State of Maharashtra, Secretary, Medical Education & Drugs Department, Mantralay Vistaar Bhavan, Mumbai-32. 2] The Director, Directorate of Medical Education & Research, St.George’s Hospital Compound, Govt.Dental College building, 4th Floor, Near Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus, (CST) Mumbai – 400 001. ...Respondents... ..... Shri C.V. Dharurkar, Advocate for petitioner. Smt.A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 2. ..... CORAM: B.R. GAVAI & K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE: 24.09.2010 - 2 - PER COURT : 1] Heard counsel for the parties. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Petition is heard finally at the stage of admission with the consent of learned counsel for the parties. 2] By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order passed by the learned Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 21.9.2010 thereby refusing to grant interim relief in favour of the petitioner. 3] In normal circumstances, we would not have interfered with the order of the learned Tribunal. However, it can be seen from the record that in similar circumstances, in Original Application No.758/2010, the learned Tribunal has directed the authorities to allow the applicant therein to appear for written examination by issuing necessary hall ticket and reserve his result of written examination till passing further order in the said original application. 4] We do not find that there is much difference in the case of the present petitioner and the applicant in Original Application No.758/2010. 5] In that view of the matter, we allow the present writ petition by directing the respondents – authorities to issue application form to the petitioner and permit him to appear for the examination scheduled to be held on 26.10.2010 by issuing him - 3 - the necessary hall ticket. As has been directed in Original Application No. 758/2010, the result of the present petitioner’s examination shall not be declared until further orders are passed by the learned MAT. The learned MAT is directed to hear and decide Original Applications Nos. 757/2010 and 758/2010 together. Needless to state that we have not considered the matter on merits and the learned MAT would decide the said original applications on their own merits in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. Authenticated copy of this order be supplied by office to the learned AGP to act upon. (K.U. Chandiwal, J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.) ndk/c24910