C.W.P. No. 3364 of 2009 Ms. Asha Parik nee Asha Kukreja vs. Guru Jambheshwar University and another Present: Mr. D.S.Patwalia, Advocate for the petitioner. *** Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the case of the petitioner is covered by the exceptions carved out in State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi reported as (2006) 4 SCC 1. He, therefore, urges that the indefinite deferment of his client's case for regularisation by the respondent No.1-University is completely unjustified. In the circumstances the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondent No.1-University be directed to take a final decision on the issue of regularisation of the petitioner since she has now been working for 14 years on adhoc basis and persons who have joined much after her have been regularlised. In my opinion it is a fair request. In the circumstances respondent No.1 is directed to take a final decision on the question of regulatisation of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. It is, however, clarified that the decision would be subject to the decision of CWP No.1675 of 2000 by which the reinstatement order of the petitioner has been challenged by the respondents. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 03, 2009 sunita