IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11330 of 2010 SANJAY KUMAR SINGH @ SANJAY SINGH son of Sri Radhy Singh resident of village- Samastipur, P. S. Fatuha, District Patna…. Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.07.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. This is the second application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by a reasoned order dated 22.2.2010 in Cr. Misc. No. 1765 of 2010. Counsel for the petitioner however would draw attention of this Court that on the earlier occasion the counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner could not appear and as such certain facts could not be brought to the notice of this Court. In this respect, he would point out that it is not correct to say as has been recorded in the earlier order that the petitioner was absconder for a period of four years. He would in this context refer to the order of the Court below dated 14.2.2007 wherein it has been indicated that the petitioner had already appeared in the Court and had filed an application through his counsel for keeping his wife 2 with all dignity. As a matter of fact, it would appear that the complaint petition itself was dismissed by the said order 14.2.2007. However, said order of the court below was set aside by this court by order dated 8.9.2008 in Cr. Revision No. 380 of 2007. The petitioner however after the complaint case was revived under the direction of this Court has not chosen to appear in the court below and has once again moved this Court for grant of anticipatory bail. In view of the fact that the petitioner had already appeared before the Court below in the complaint case there would be now question of grant of anticipatory bail. That being so, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected and he is directed to surrender before the Court below which keeping in view that the petitioner has always tried to patch up the dispute with his wife the complainant and had also respected the order of the Court would grant regular bail to the petitioner on usual terms and conditions. With the aforesaid observation and direction this application is disposed of. 3 Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned Court below on the cost being deposited by the learned counsel for the petitioner. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)