IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 10692 of 2009 Between: 1 Pillakatupula Venkaiah S/o. Late China Venkateswarlu R/o. Ananthavaram, Krosuru Mandal, Guntur District. 2 Battula Srinivasa Rao S/o. Tirupathaiah R/o. Ananthavaram, Krosuru Mandal, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Regional Joint Commissioner Multi Zone-I Endowments Department Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 2 The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments Endowments Department Guntur, Guntur District. 3 Sri Jagannatha Swami Vari Devasthnam Rep. by its Executive Officer Brugubanda Village, Sattanapalli Mandal, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the auction notification issued by the 3rd respondent dated 15-5-2009 in respect of the lands of the petitioners Ac.12-80 cents covered by Sy.No.276 of Vuyyandana Village, Krosuru Mandal, Guntur District as illegal, arbitrary, unConstitutional, without jurisdiction, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the Provisions of A.P. Charitable & Hindu Religious Institutions & Endowments Act 1987 & rules made there under, consequently direct the respondents not to evict the petitioners from the lands an extent of Ac.12-80 covered by Sy.No.276 of Vuyyandana Village, Krosuru Mandal, Guntur District. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.VENKATESWARLU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA W.P.No.10692 of 2009 ORDER:- Sri Posani Venkateshwarlu representing Sri Nimmagadda Venkateswarlu states that the writ petition became infructuous. The same is recorded. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ______________________ Justice P.S.Narayana 7th August, 2009 smr