IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32192 of 2009 1. AMRISH PRASAD GUPTA, S/o Banarsi Gupta 2. SHUSHILA DEVI, W/o Amrish Prasad Gupta 3. PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA, S/o Amrish Prasad Gupta All R/o village – Atariya, P.S. Durgawati, District – Kaimur. …. Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …. Opp. Party. ------- 02/ 03.11.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. Initially complaint case was filed on the basis of which Durgawati P.S. Case No. 12 of 2008 was instituted for offence under Section 366A/34 of the IPC. Allegation made by the informant was that his minor daughter Naziya was taken by Niraj Kumar Gupta along with ornaments and cash, in which the consent and connivance of Niraj Kumar’s mother Shushila Devi and other family members, is there. Counsel for the petitioners submits that so far petitioners are concerned, direct involvement is not alleged by the informant in the FIR. After investigation final form was submitted by the police, but cognizance has been taken by the Magistrate differing with the final form. Considering these facts, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioners, namely, Amrish Prasad Gupta, Shushila Devi and Pankaj Kumar Gupta - 2 - is allowed. They are directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case of their surrender before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Durgawati P.S. Case No. 12 of 2008 to the satisfaction of Sri S. Singh, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Kaimur at Bhabua. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)