^S^^fiSSS'SS'SK: IN THE fflGH COURT OF^tjmiiAI^JRE.AT- BILASPUR (C.G.) W. P. No. 1 62-4 OF 2004 ^ BETWEEN PETITIONER •"SII; -..•^ / ^ /^ f.M^^ ^w .0^' ^/ .••'^"^' KARAN SINGH KARASOLIA AGED- 42 YEARS, SON OF LATE SHRI M.L.KARASOLIA, POSTED AS- ASSISTANT ENGINEER, CURRENT CHARGE, P.H.E, SUB-DIVISION, KHAIRAGARH, DISTRICT- RAJNANDGAON (C.G.) R/0- KHAIRAGARH, (RAJNANDGAON). i6'^' /•• <-" ,f .y t.' RESPONDENTS ^" ^ I"--. fc VERSUS 1. 2. 3. 4. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH - THE SECRBTARY, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGD^EERDSTG DEPARTMENT MANTRALAY, D.K.S.BHAWAN, RAIPR. ENGDsOBER-nsT-CHmF PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERWG CHHATTISGARH, RAIPUR. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING CIRCLE, RAIPUR. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DIVISION, RAJNANDGAON (C.G.) SHRI S.K.GUPTA, ASSISTANT ENGDSTEER, CURRENT CHARGE, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERGSTG RECHARGWG SUB- DIVISION, AMBIKAPUR DISTRICT- SARGUJA (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE- 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF BSTDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WMT N THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION, SUITABLE DmECTION OR DmECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS. 5. •s^ ^Tpn^^, •®^PTS,l^irey j^L..&..ji2M^y SJ81 8SS*-' ^w^u^ IT^I'I^ w.^i ^^ir ^naf ^ ft%i? ir sfflrH astw 1.7.2004 Shri R.S. Patel, counsel for the p4titioner. ! Shri Vinod Shrivastava, Govt. Actwcate for flie State. Ajqilication for uigent hearing is [allowed. Heard. j Leamed counsel for the petitioa^r aibnrits that Ihe maUw rebtes to tnmsfer. He farther siibmite fliat fw Ae present t|ie pedttoner may be gwen aa. opportunity of fifing the detailed representation before|tfae competeitt authority of Ae resp<mdents, which shall be considued on its ovwi meSts m accordance wtth law. Having congidered and without case, in the opinion of tfris Court, ends jexptessing any omnion on the merhs of the j>fjustice wiB be setved ifa direction is gwen to tfae petitioner to make a detdled re((resentati<m raising Ms gHasvafsess before the eompetent authority of the respondent^ alot®wth a copy of the petition aid flus order, withinl5 days, and on such repre^entattmi bdng ffled, the competeat aulfauity A ofAe respondents shaB decide the sam^ on its own merits in aecordaiice with law as eaity as possible preferably within 4 weeks fiinn the date. of teceyt of fte representation. It is made clear tfiat if ajny ^ievanw stiB renains, tfae petitioner msy avail fhe remedy available mtder flie law.j With Ihe aforesaid obseivations, jius petition stands dteposed of. ConsequenttyM.W.P.No.l446/2|IX)4 also stands dispowdof. ¥^t^n 3ud6<> C^?W^FS^8-9!MX -50,000.