IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 18TH MARCH 2011 / 27TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 8088 of 2011(I) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- V.N.NARAYANAN NAIR, KALACHERIL (SUPRIYA) KOZHIPILLY, KOOTHATTUKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANILAL SRI.K.VIDYASAGAR SRI.S.NIDHEESH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE COMMISSIONER FOR LAND REVENUE, THE COMMISSIONERATE, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI. 3. THE SUB-COLLECTOR, IDUKKI. 4. THE ADDL.THAHASILDAR, THODUPUZHA TALUK, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI. SR.GOVT.PLEADER SRI.MATHEW GEORGE VADAKKEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 8088 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 18th day of March, 2011 J U D G M E N T In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that during the pendency of Exts.P3 and P4, revision and stay petition, he has been issued Ext.P5 notice. According to the petitioner, proceedings were initiated against him under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act. The proceedings of the Tahsildar were confirmed by the Sub Collector and Collector, which made the petitioner to file Ext.P3 revision and Ext.P4 stay petition before the 1st respondent. It is stated that during the pendency of the above applications, by Ext.P5, he has been called upon to remit the amount due under the impugned proceedings. 2. Having regard to the pendency of the revision and the stay petition, I feel it is premature to have called upon the petitioner to remit the amount by Ext.P5. 3. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the 1st respondent will consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 revision with notice to the petitioner and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 2 months of production of a copy of WPC No. 8088/11 :2 : this judgment. It is directed that in the meanwhile, further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P5 for the recovery of the amount due will stand stayed. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before respondents 1 and 4 for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp