1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 251 OF 2010. Vikram K. Jadhav -: versus :- Kundlik K. Jadhav Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 24 , 2010. Heard Shri S.R. Deshpande, learned counsel for petitioner/plaintiff. Objection is to the order dated 09.10.2009 whereby the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Mehkar has rejected prayer of petitioner / plaintiff for impounding document. The learned counsel for petitioner has urged that impounding was necessary in order to enable the petitioner / plaintiff to read the document in evidence by getting it exhibited. I have perused the application moved by the plaintiff for said purpose and also considered the contentions of the learned counsel for petitioner, that at the time when the document was entered into, there was no question of registering the said document. He has pointed out that the amendment requiring this has come into force in 2001. This Court has on 20.01.2010 issued notice for final disposal and also granted interim relief. Respondent is 2 served with said notice, but has chosen not to appear. In this situation, the petitioner / plaintiff is permitted to file appropriate application before the trial Court and trial Court shall reconsider it uninfluenced by its order dated 09.10.2009 passed below Exh.35, only for said purpose the impugned order is quashed and set aside. Rule accordingly with no order as to cost. JUDGE Rgd.