‘vVrit ?et'tioi1 g3 t N0. i636 &f2f}33 : Ram Panda‘am Vastrakar, Vastrakar; Assistant agéd about Tsacher, 4’? years, Boys son Primary of Shri Schooi Nand Ghmim, Vilmg Iglmld Tald-latpui, Disrit BiEaspur (CG) VER$W§ m m M : A State of C11J1aifi§gazig W - ETETIQNER W. 3[> Schod Educaiion, Dau Kalb/an Si The DiStrict Eduvwfrm Offr, (CG). 3. (CG). The Block v Edueatitm Officer, TzLldlatltmr, Dim. Bilaspur (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE J3 (SB: Hmfble Mi: 8a ‘ liliotri. Pi‘egenf : 8hr} g‘ Satish K.Agnihomr '7 Judge V 1“,- < n " N im m, , K€saxwani, Advocate for the petitioner, State/raspondents. Shri AS. Kachhwaha, Deputy Advocatc Gmcrai for ’ihc ORAL ORDER (Passed mi 21‘} ‘ ofMareh, 2%63) V The plitioner was appoilited énifialiy, an a fixad pay 0f Rs. 350A petitiomr Wag thereafEr, granted mgtilar 2. pmbatian pm‘iad. pay scalg cm C‘_1,_pl,.tiox1 afthe T113 questirm 0f law involvgd herein is astc whJLi ma patitioner entitlsd to regular 3. pay scale wef. thg date ofinitial appointmgnt or frm'n the date of completion Qfprobatign pgriod. Learned counsal appearing for the petitioner as well as for the. State/rewonclems jointly submit that thg qusstion of lmvinvolved E11 tho present writ petition are tho saine aq to that of in 4. in W.P.(S) N0. 5976/2006 (Siisllil Tiwai’i aim. otlmi's Vsg $mte Giwermneni of Chhattisgayli & Qihers), whioli was allowoii Vido ordor datocl 07. .l l 2(lGoi 111 View oftho above-stated Siibi,_iSSic-n$ made by loamod counsel for the games, the iwit petitioo is allowod iii filo same faring we potitionor is aiiiitlsd; rogiilar pay scale with Egg-o1.“ ii‘om tho dafé of iiiitial appoiiitmont; whys-‘3‘ to vaificaiion ofihe f: N. No ordar asto costs. "