IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 17TH OCTOBER 2008 / 25TH ASWINA 1930 R.P.No. 1064 of 2008(N) ---------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.29533/2007 Dated 17/09/2008 ...................................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 ---------------------------------------------------- 1. THE MANAGER, MSP HSS, MALAPPURAM. 2. THE HEADMISTRESS, MSP HSS, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.E.S.ASHRAF RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & 3RD RESPONDENT --------------------------------------------------------- 1. SMITHA.U.,UPSA.,MSP HSS, MALAPPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MALAPPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. A.J. VARGHESE THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P. No. 1064 of 2008 in W.P.(C) No. 29533 OF 2008 N = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 17th day of October 2008 J U D G M E N T The writ petition was disposed of directing implementation of Ext. P7 order, which was issued during the pendency of the writ petition. This review is filed on the ground that the review petitioner had filed a revision against Ext. P7 order and therefore Ext. P7 ought not to have been directed to be implemented at this stage. 2. At the time when the writ petition was disposed of, pendency of the revision was not informed to this Court. Therefore, all that is necessary to be clarified is that the implementation of Ext. P7 will be subject to the outcome of the revision that is pending. Further it is also clarified that the judgment or this order will not prejudice the right of the petitioner in impugning Ext. P7 or seeking any relief against the said order. Review Petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-