IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 58 of 2009 Chander Prakash & others. ….. Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and another. ….. Respondents Mr. K.S. Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for respondent nos. 1&2. None for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. K.S. Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for respondent nos. 1&2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. Nandan Arya, the learned A.G.A. submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against petitioner nos. 1, 4, 5 & 6 before the Circle Officer concerned on 18.02.2009 and the same is likely to be submitted before the court concerned in the near future but petitioner nos. 2 & 3 have not been charge sheeted as during the investigation no prima facie evidence has been collected against them. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 29.01.2009 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet/final report before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat,J.) 17.03.2009 L.S.R.