@#@#@#@#@#@#@ THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO :18017 of 2005 DATED:16-08-2005 Between: A.Suri Babu ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Chairman, University Grants Commission, New Delhi and 3 others. .....RESPONDENTS @#@#@#@#@#@#@ HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:18017 of 2005 ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the non-selection of the petitioner for awarding teacher fellowship under the faculty improvement programme and on such non-selection, it is stated that the petitioner made a representation to the respondents 3 and 4 for reconsideration of the claim and for re-awarding of marks so as to get awarded the teacher fellowship. As the said representation was not disposed of, the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition. 2. According to the petitioner, there is only one vacancy for awarding teacher fellowship under faculty improvement programme for which another candidate has already been selected while denying the said selection to the petitioner. If the petitioner is aggrieved, the course open to the petitioner is only to question the said selection, if there is any provision, but not by making a representation to the respondents 3 and 4 for reconsideration in awarding marks to the petitioner, as a result of which he was not selected. 3. It is represented by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 3 and 4 that there is no such provision for reconsideration of awarding of marks to any of the candidates. 4 . Under the above circumstances, there is no merit in the claim of the petitioner as to the representation being made to the respondents 3 and 4 or even non-disposal of such representation. 5. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as devoid of merits. No order as to costs. __________________ S.ANANDA REDDY, J 16th August, 2005 SKM