1 4.sj-229-06 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 229 OF 2006 WITH SUMMARY SUIT NO. 638 OF 2003. Surjeetsing Sachdev, carrying on business at Solaris II, 2nd floor, Saki Vihar Road, Powai, Andheri (E), Bombay-400 072. ..Plaintiff. vs. 1. Ganesh Sugar Supply Company, Partnership Firm, carrying on Business at Chandrakant H. Kenia, D/21, Jeevan Bahar Co-op. Hsg. Society Ltd., 3rd Road, Chembur, Bombay-400 071. 2. M/s. Swastik Trading Corporation, a Partnership Firm, carrying on business at D/21, Jeevan Bahar Co.op. Hsg. Society Ltd., 3rd Road, Chembur, Bombay-400 071. 3. Chandrakant H. Kenia, Carrying on business at D/21, Jeevan Bahar Co.op. Hsg. Society Ltd., 3rd Road, Chembur, Bombay -400 71. 4. Nitin V. Nisar, Carrying on business at Chandrakant H. Kenia, D/21, Jeevan Bahar Co.op. Hsg. Society Ltd., 3rd Road, Chembur, Bombay-400 071. 5. Bharti Kenia, Carrying on business at Chandrakant H. Kenia, D/21, Jeevan Bahar 2 4.sj-229-06 Co.op. Hsg. Society Ltd., 3rd Road, Chembur, Bombay-400 071. 6. Rajesh V. Nisar, Carrying on business at Chandrakant H. Kenia, D/21, Jeevan Bahar Co.op. Hsg. Society Ltd., 3rd Road, Chembur, Bombay-400 071. ..Defendants. .... Ms. Kavita Lalwani, for Plaintiff. Mr. Chandrakant Kenia, Defendant No.3 & Partner of Defendant No.1, present in person. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 21ST SEPTEMBER 2011. JUDGMENT : By this Summons for Judgment, the Plaintiff prays that the Judgment be entered in favour of the Plaintiff in the above Suit and against the Defendants for the sum of Rs.1,58,500/- as set out in the Plaint along with interest and costs. The Suit is filed on a Bill of Exchange dated 7th July 1999 payable in 90 days from the date of execution. The Bill of Exchange is drawn by the Defendant No.1, firm and accepted by the Defendant No.2 firm. The Defendant Nos. 3 and 4 are the partners of the Defendant No.1 and Defendant Nos. 5 and 6 are the partners of the Defendant No.2. The Defendant No.3 is the husband of the Defendant No.5 and Defendant Nos. 4 and 6 are the brothers of the Defendant No.5 and therefore brother-in-law of the Defendant No.3. The Defendant No.3 is present in person. He is the Power of Attorney holder of all the Defendants. He submits that the Defendants have no defense to the Suit. In view thereof, the original documents are taken on record and the Summons for Judgment is made absolute i.e. a decree is passed in favour of the 3 4.sj-229-06 Plaintiff and against the Defendant as prayed. The Defendants shall pay interest at the rate of 18% from the date of filing of the Suit on the said amount of Rs.1,58,500/- until payment and/or realisation. 2. In view of the above, the Summons for Judgment No. 229 of 2006 and Summary Suit No. 638 of 2003 stand disposed of. Refund of Court fees, if any, as per Rules. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]