IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 974 OF 2011 Afsar Ali and others. ………….Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …Respondents. Present : Shri D.C.S. Rawat, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri S.S. Adhikari, AGA, present for the State. Shri Lalit Sharma, Advocate for respondent no. 3 Sabdar Ali. . Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. 2. By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought quashing of the First Information Report dated 24.10.2011 registered as FIR No. 281 of 2011 relating to offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 323, 324 and 506 IPC, Police Station Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar. 3. Though it is a case, which has arisen out of a matrimonial dispute, but considering the nature of injuries and the weapons said to have been used in the crime, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the investigation of the case. 4. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that if the petitioners, namely, Afsar Ali, Ahshan Ali, Babu, Bhola, Noorjaha and Husna surrender before the court concerned, their bail applications shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay. (Stay Application No. 11694 of 2011 and Caveat Application No. 945 of 2011 stand disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 11.11.2011 Rathour