IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41442 of 2009 PRAKASH MEHTA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 20.11.2009 Heard. None is named in the F.I.R. as accused in the case which is under section 302 and 324 of IPC. The rejection order also does not contain any substantial material to connect the petitioner to the crime. The contention is that some developments were made in prosecution case and that too may not be sufficient. It was contended that the witnesses stated that the petitioner’s father, he himself and his brother were seen going with chhoora in their hands without any further allegation against any of them. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner Prakash Mehta be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000/ (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Araria in Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 155 of 2000 (G.R. No. 1426 of 2000). Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)