^^-^^^•^<v-, ^.. ^ '^^'^-^^r.^' r ^^^r^ »B|lBBenc BEFQRE THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.I APPLICANT ^CO..^ ... ..^"r 35^$»!1 ^^s^^ M.C.C. No. \\\^ OF 2011 J^and Kumar Tamrakar, aged 58 years, S/o Shri Chinta Ram Tamrakar, R/o Quarter no.31, ..^••fc Gali no.2 Shikchak-Nagar, Durg, .-*^' \\ NON-APPLICANTS Tahsil 85 Distt. Durg C.G. VBRSUS Smt. Sakuntala Sao, aged 69 Years, W/o Shri M.L. Sao, R/o 181 Jawaharnagar, Durg Tahsil & District Durg C.G. APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF Civil Revisioa No. l^. 10S/2010 DISMISSED ON DATED 21/07/11 FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. The above named applicant/appellant begs to submit as under:- ^ /,^ ^ Sahu '?^';:^P7T^T^/^'fflTrrT?, [^<VI{^1^< <»W<'(T^lHlchte-n.^.........^...^H-^ 200 @ 3TI^I ^T^ (^P^T^) S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K 25.07.2011 Shri Ravindra Agrawal v|i for the applicant. Heard on application for; Learned counsel counsel for the applicant coul<t mistake, therefore, C.R. No.| 21.07.2011, may be restored tc| appearjng for the applicant submlts that the not appear on account of bonafide 102/10, which was dismissed on its original file. On due consideration, applicant has succeeded in et<plai therefore, the application is all(|>wed to its original file. A copy of this order be the same be listed for hearing 4)l^(d4l'1 'RTRfc^ ^f f^^ Tf^$R i?3tRP:T3TI^T Aaarwal ith Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocates estoration ofC.R. No. 102/10. am satisfied that the counset for plaining the cause of his absence, and C.R. No. 102/10 is restored pjaced on record ofthe original fite and ^fter two weeks. Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge