IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 4499 of 2011 Decided on: June 14, 2011. Sher Singh Moon ......Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and ors. ....Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. R. S. Gautam, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “i) That the writ in the nature of certiorari may kindly be issued for quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 07.06.2011 passed by respondent No.2 for which the petitioner humbly prays. 2) That the writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued, thereby directing the respondents to implement either the order dated 21.05.2011 or 03.06.2011 and the petitioner may either be transferred to Veterinary Dispensary Tikkari Darh, where the person has completed his normal stay or Veterinary Dispensary Bansha, where the post is still lying vacant for which the petitioner humbly prays.” 2. It is seen that the petitioner has completed his normal tenure at Veterinary Hospital, Anni. But on being shifted from there, it is seen that the petitioner was being shuttled from place to place and finally, vide impugned order, he is now transferred to Veterinary Dispensary, Bahang, which is a sub cadre area. According to the petitioner, he has already served in the sub cadre and tribal areas, whereas there are many people who have never served in tribal or sub cadre areas. It is further pointed out that the vacancy at Veterinary Dispensary, Bahang is still available and that there are many places where the people are still 2 continuing for more than 15-20 years. Still further, it is pointed out that the petitioner has serious domestic inconveniences, aged mother and school going children etc. All these aspects, the petitioner may point out before the second respondent by way of an appropriate representation within one week from today and in that event, the second respondent shall look into the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law and justice, adverting also to the availability of vacancies, as pointed out by the petitioner. The needful in that regard shall be done within another two weeks. As and when the petitioner is relieved, he may not be compelled to join the transferred station and it will be open to him to avail leave of the kind due. 3. With the above observations, writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice June 14, 2011 ( Justice Sanjay Karol ), (rana/pankaj) Judge.