( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5559 OF 2010 Vasant Nivrutti Shinde PETITIONER VERSUS Trimbak Nivrutti Shinde & others RESPONDENTS .... Mr. Anil M. Gaikwad, advocate for the petitioner. .... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 25th June, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Considering the concurrent judgements of both the Courts and having regard to the fact that the orders are discretionary, since they are passed by way of interim relief, it is difficult to entertain the petition. No perversity or arbitrariness appears from the impugned orders. The orders are passed on basis of material. Consequently, the petition is dismissed. The trial Court shall expedite final hearing of the suit and to complete the same within a period of one (1) year as far as possible. No costs. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/wp5559-10