IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6312 of 2010 RAM PRAVESH YADAV SON OF SRI HARDEO YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 3.3.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections147, 148, 149, 302/201 of the Indian Penal Code and 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the first information report, which was instituted against unknown persons and thereafter his name transpired in the supervision note of the Dy.S.P way back in August, 1997 itself, but no processes were issued against the present petitioner. Thereafter recently on 29.7.2009 the processes were issued against the petitioner, in pursuance of which the petitioner surrendered on 6.11.2009. It has been further submitted that the petitioners is an accused in only one other case, which is mentioned in paragraph 13 of the petition. In view of such, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Konch P.S.case No.93 of 1997, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar - 2 - nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse of bail, (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The Magistrate concerned before releasing the petitioner on bail will verify the fact that the petitioner is an accused in only one other case i.e. Konch P.S.case No.98 of 1996 instituted for the offences u/ss.307, 380 and 436 of the I.P.C and 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )