1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.01.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.109 of 2011 and MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.1 of 2011 Gomathi .. Petitioner Vs. 1.P.Shanthi 2.P.Shankar 3.Sivakami .. Respondents Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam to number the unnumbered E.A.No.177 of 2010 and dispose of the same on merits within a time limit as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. For Petitioner : Mr.R.G.Shankar Ganesh ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam to number the unnumbered E.A.A.No.177 of 2010. 2. It is stated in the petition that the first respondent as plaintiff has obtained an executable decree in Original Suit No.764 of 2004 and the same has been put into execution in Execution Petition No.87 of 2007. The second respondent is the Judgment debtor. The third respondent has purchased the property in dispute through Court action. The revision petitioner has filed the petition in question under Order XXI, Rule 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying to set aside the sale held on 08.06.2009 and the same has been returned and in order to direct the Court below to number it, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed. 3. From the representation made on the side of the revision petitioner, the Court can easily discern that the property in question has been sold through Court action on 08.06.2009 and the present petition has been filed on 31.12.2010. The Court below has returned the same by way of raising a query relating to limitation. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner has contended that since the petitioner is a third party, he has no limitation to file the present petition, considering the prevailing circumstances, the revision petitioner can be directed to represent the petition in question after making proper endorsement with regard to the query of limitation raised by the Court below and altogether the present Civil Revision Petition deserves to be dismissed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. In fine, this Civil Revision Petition deserves dismissal and accordingly is dismissed without costs at the stage of admission. The revision petitioner is directed to represent the petition in question after making proper endorsement. The Registry is directed to return the original petition. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (L.A) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To The District Munsif, Thirumangalam. + 1 cc to Mr.R.Shankar Ganesh, Advocate, SR No.2442 C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No.109 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 22.01.2011 smn RJ/2.2.11 2p/3c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/