IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17180 of 2009 1. VIJAY KUMAR VIJAY S/O SRI UPENDRA YADAV R/O VILL GANGANAGAR, PURANI POLICE LINE, P.S.KOTWALI, DISTT- MUNGER 2. ANAND KUMAR CNANDAN S/O SRI KANIKLAL SAH R/O VILL KAURA MAIDAN , COLLEGE ROAD, P.S.KOTWALI, DISTT-MUNGER 3. BABLU KUMAR S/O SRI KEDAR PRASAD YADAV R/O VILL HERADIARA, P.S.KASHIM BAZAR,DISTT-MUNGER 4. PAWAN KUMAR S/O SRI BACHA RAI R/O VILL HERADIARA, P.S.KASHIM BAZAR, DISTT-MUNGER 5. NARIN BHAWANI S/O SRI SHASHI BHUSAN SAH R/O VILL KASHIM BAZAR,P.S.KASHIM BAZAR, DISTT-MUNGER 6. DHARMENDRA KUMAR S/O SRI UPENDRA YADAV R/O VILL JHAFAR NAGAR, P.S.MUFFASIL, DISTT-MUNGER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE D.G. -CUM - I.G. OF POLICE BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE CHAIRMAN CONSTABLE SELECTION BOARD, B.M.P.-9, JAMALPUR THROUGH COMMANDANT B.M.P.-9 JAMALPUR 4. THE CHAIRMAN CONSTABLE SELECTION BOARD LAKHISARAI, DISTRICT THROUGH S.P.LAKHISARAI 5. THE CHAIRMAN CONSTABLE SELECTION BOARD B.M.P.-22 JAMUI THROUGH COMMANDANT B.M.P.-22 NOW-11, JAMUI 6. THE CHAIRMAN, CONSTABLE SELECTION BOARD, MUZAFFARPUR THROUGH S.P. MUZAFFARPUR ----------- 02 04.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners claim to have been the applicants under advertisement issued in the year, 2004, for appointment on the posts of Constable. There is no pleading in the writ application that any person with marks lesser than petitioners has been appointed, or that a person lower in the merit panel has been appointed, thus discriminating against the petitioners causing 2 arbitrariness. Fresh advertisement has also been issued in 2009 against which the petitioners can well apply and be considered in accordance with law. This Court is not persuaded to start a roving enquiry into the appointments at the behest of the petitioners. If the petitioners file a representation, making full and complete disclosure with regard to the marks obtained by them and the details of a person with lesser marks than those appointed or below them in the merit panel having been appointed, only in that event, are the respondents obliged to consider their representation, and not otherwise. The writ application stands disposed. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)