IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9340 of 2010 1. KAMAL BHAGAT S/O LATE MUNILAL BHAGAT R/O VILL.- JAGDISHPUR KAMTAUL, P.O. ANANT KAMTAUL, P.S. KURHANI, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUZAFFARPUR 3. THE THEN CIRCLE OFFICER, SAHEBGANJ, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR ----------- 2 13.04.2011 In this writ application, petitioner has challenged an order of the disciplinary authority passed on conclusion of the departmental proceeding (Annexure-1), by which he has held that the petitioner shall not be entitled for his salary for his proved absence from duty on the Principle of ‘no work no pay.’ On the basis of various Annexures and documents, learned counsel for the petitioner tries to justify that the petitioner was in fact not absent from duty and he has some explanation in respect of period of his absence. However, there is not a single pleading in the writ application as to on what basis the departmental proceeding and the punishment order stands vitiated. He has not even pleaded that he was not given any appropriate opportunity to explain his 2 conduct or explain his absence which he is trying to do to this Court in a writ proceeding. This Court therefore does not find any ground made out in the case for interference in the matter. The writ application is dismissed. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)