IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 13260 of 2009 Between: C.Parimala D/o. C Subbarayudu Andhra Pradesh Social Welfare Residential(RPRP) School APSWR(RPRP) School Quarters,Madakalavari Palli Badvel,Kadapa District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Andhra Pradesh Social Welfare Residential Education Institutions Society, rep.by its Secretary Masab Tank,Hyderaad 2 The Andhra Pradesh Social Welfare Residential Education Institutions Society, rep.by its Joint Secretary Zone IV Kadapa, Kadapa District. 3 The Principal Andhra Pradesh Social Welfare Residential, Madakalavari Palli Badvel,Kadapa District 4 Smt. N.Padmavathi W/o. not known to the petitioner Andhra Pradesh Social Welfare Residential (RPRP) School Madakalavari Palli, Gopavaram Mandal, Badvel, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings, dated 20.04.2009 issued by the 3rd respondent and the consequential proceedings in Rc.No.A1/243/2008, dated 30.06.2009 issued by the 2nd respondent herein as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory, colorable exercise of power and contrary to the guidelines framed through the Society Standing Orders No.13, dated 31.10.1995 and also the proceedings in Memo Rc.No.G1/13014/2007, dated 11.10.2007 by the 1st respondent, apart from being violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR. V.R.REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondents : MR. K.DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.13260 OF 2009 ORDER : This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 30.06.2009 thereby directing the petitioner to vacate the quarter in which she is residing at present by 2.7.2009 as arbitrary and illegal. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 3. The petitioner had earlier filed W.P.No.12004 of 2009 and the same was disposed of by this Court with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner to continue in the quarter in her occupation. Accordingly, the 2nd respondent, having heard the petitioner as well as the respondents 3 and 4 herein, passed the impugned order concluding that the petitioner was not eligible for allotment of the quarter in question and accordingly directing her to vacate the quarter by 2.7.2009. As could be seen from the reasons assigned in the impugned order, there are only four quarters available for teaching staff apart from two quarters for non-teaching staff. The said quarters have now been allotted as per the procedure prescribed under Standing Order No.13 of 1995, dated 31.10.1995. It is also relevant to note that while making the allotment, the 2nd respondent has taken into consideration the fact that the presence of the teachers who are teaching 10th Class students is essential in the quarters located in the premises of the school. Admittedly the petitioner as on today is teaching the students of 5th to 7th classes. In the totality of the facts and circumstances, I am unable to hold that the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent is arbitrary and illegal on any ground whatsoever. Hence, the interference by this Court is unwarranted. However keeping in view the request of the petitioner that for security reasons she needs accommodation in the quarters situated in the school campus, I deem it appropriate to direct the respondent Nos.1 & 2 to consider the request of the petitioner sympathetically so as to accommodate her in the school campus. Such consideration may be made as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of granting one week time from today to the petitioner to vacate the quarter in question. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 03.07.2009 gbs