IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM M-33066 of 2009 Date of Decision: 03.03.2010 Gurmail Singh & another ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G., Punjab Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate for the complainant. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the matter has since been compromised. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant does not dispute the same and states that he has no objection if the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioners is confirmed. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the Order dated 25.11.2009 passed by this Court is, hereby, made absolute. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 03.03.2010 JUDGE gurpreet