IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.14815 of 2010 Date of decision : 2.12.2010 Dharamvir Singh Hooda … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.M.Kumar Hon’ble Ms.Justice Ritu Bahri Present: Mr.D.S.Patwalia, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Mamta Singhal Talwar, AAG, Haryana for respondents No.1 and 2. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.Kumar, J. Reply on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 filed in the Court, today which is taken on record. Copy thereof has been furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner. According to the averments made in para 1 of the preliminary submissions, the tenure of the office of President of the Society has already expired on 30.9.2010. In view of the aforesaid averments, learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press the instant petition at this stage by reserving his rights to challenge Rule 15(3)(iii) of the Government Employees (Conduct) Rules, 1966. The aforesaid question with regard to vires is left open. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. (M.M.Kumar ) Judge (Ritu Bahri) Judge 2.12.2010 sd