1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 3403 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 3403 OF 2011 *** 1. The petitioner claims to be the Chairman of education society against which School Tribunal has passed the order. The order to the extent of recovery of arrears is being executed and in those proceedings Presiding Officer, School Tribunal has directed attachment warrant to be issued. Shri Patil contends that attachment warrant is being issued against personal properties of petitioner. He contends that the School Tribunal in its judgment in favour of Respondent No.1 has directed recovery from the education department out of non-salary grants due and payable to the school. In this situation, according to him, the attachment of personal properties is unwarranted and without jurisdiction. 2. The School Tribunal has passed the order 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 3403 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. after giving opportunity to present petitioner. An application was filed on 18th March, 2011 for such attachment and reply thereto was filed on same day by the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 before School Tribunal. Thereafter, School Tribunal has passed impugned order on 25th March, 2011 and only ordered attachment. The Petitioner can, therefore, very well point out to the School Tribunal his defence and contend before it that personal properties cannot be attached and School Tribunal can look into it in accordance with law. 3. In view of this, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. Petition is rejected. No costs. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:03/05/2011. ans/3403