IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3401 of 2009 1.DADAN MAHTO @ DADAN KUMAR s/o Sakhichand Mahto 2.MEERA DEVI & NEERA DEVI W/O Dadan Mahto all R/o Muhalla Ratanpura, Ojha Toli, P.S. Bhagwan Bazar, Distt. Saran at Chapra. ---PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 8.5.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The offence alleged against the petitioners, who are apprehending their arrest in connection with Husainganj P.S. Case No.139 of 2006 (Complaint Case No.C-2120/07), is under sections 304B and 120B/34 of the Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is absolutely no allegation against these two petitioners except that their names figure in the accused column. The police submitted final form after investigation. However, on protest, cognizance has been taken against the petitioners, whereafter they apprehend their arrest. The learned APP appearing for the State is not in a position to refute the submissions with regard to the allegations made in the First Information Report. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioners no.1 and 2 above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Husainganj P.S. Case No.139 of 2006 (Complaint Case No.C-2120/07) within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- 2 (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)