^ t^>\^^ IN HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (c) N0. ^IZ-^-QF 2010 PETITIONER Vs RESPONDENTS ^.l^ ~^&^ ^ ^' 2.The <^ . ^'"..A' ^^-y ^y" ^-' ry Gurmail Singh Saini, son of Sardar Gurucharan Singh Saini, aged about 50 years, for himself and Karta of Hindu Undivided Family in his name, resident of Telibandha, Shyam Nagar, Raipur (CG) ^ 1. Municipal Corporation, Raipur through its Commissioner, Raipur. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur S.Harpal Singh, son of Shri bilip Singh, aged about 52 years, Proprietor Guru Teg Bahadur Electricals, Main Road, Telibandha, Raipur. 4.Rajkumar, son of Shri Hasamal, aged about 48 years, Proprietor Santoshi Bhusa Bhandar, Main Road, Telibandha, Raipur (CG) PETITION UNt>ER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA II tl'ii -l:^.-i •:^ I! ll - ^^' ^ HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : B5LASPUR WRITPETITIONfCVIiJO:7T22 OF2010 PET1TIONER RESPONDENTS Gurmail jSingh Saini Versus J c Municip^il Corporation, Raipur & Others I (Writ Petitionunder Artiele 226/227 ofthe Constitutlon of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble ShrijSatishlK.Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri K. Sharma, Advocate fbrthe petitioner. Shri H.B.Agrawai, Senior ^dvocate with Smt. Meera Jaiswai, Advocate for the respondents No.1 & 2. • ORDER;(ORAU (Passed on 13th dayofJune, 2011) 1. At the very outset, Shri Agawal,learned senlor coynsel aiongwith Smt Meera Jaiswai, ]appearing for the respondents No.1 & 2 submits that the dispute involved in the writ petition is under consideration and the matter has been referred.to the Nazul Officer for demarcation of the iand belonging to the petitioner as well as other respondents. The needfui shall be done within a period oftwo months. \ - . ' . " • •" . 2. In view of foregoing, learned counse! appearing for the petitioner submjts that nothing survives for adjudication in this matter at this stage. 3. Accordlngiy, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ashok li; T ^ 1: