IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16281 of 2011 Jitendra Pandey Versus Brij Bihari Pandey & Ors ---------------------------------- 02. 21.09.2011. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the garb of repairing, the respondent no.1, Brij Bihari Pandey is making new construction. The said respondent no.1 gave undertaking before the Court that he will repair the old house only. Now, in view of the order passed by the Court below he is making construction with the help of police force. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that learned Court below directed the officer-in-charge to provide police force to the respondent no.1 for repairing only. It does not appear from the impugned order that this fact which now the petitioner is raising before this Court was ever brought to the notice of the Court. Therefore, if the petitioner so advised may bring this fact to the notice of Court below. This Court in writ jurisdiction cannot decide this fact. With this observation, this writ application is dismissed. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)