IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2010 / 19TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 17900 of 2010(J) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN EP 332/2009 IN RCP.16/2008 of MUNSIFF COURT, PARAVUR .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- ABY S/O. JACOB AGED 30, KALLUVEETTIL HOUSE, KADAMAKKUDY VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.KRISHNAKUMAR SRI.P.H.SHAJI (THRIKKAKARA) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- KOCHURANI, W/O. URMEES , AGED 66, THALIYATH HOUSE, PUTHANPALLY MURI, VARAPPUZHA VILLAGE, PARAVOOR TALUK. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No.17900 OF 2010 ------------------------ Dated this the 9th day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. The tenant, who was the appellant in RCA No.26/2008 on the files of the Rent Control Appellate Authority, North Paravur, is the petitioner. An eviction order under Section 11(2)(b) was passed against him and it was against that order, he filed RCA No.26/2009. The RCA was dismissed by the Appellate Authority on 29/5/2010. According to the appellant, he has already filed an application for obtaining certified copy of the judgment in the RCA and he intends to prefer a revision to this Court under Section 20. His prayer in this writ petition is that till such time as certified copy is obtained and he is enabled to prefer a revision, the Execution Court be directed not to evict him. 2. We are of the view that, in the nature of the limited relief which we are giving hereunder, it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondent. This writ petition will stand disposed of in the following terms; WPC.No.17900/2010 2 i). If the petitioner has filed an application for obtaining an urgent copy of the order dated 29/5/2010 in RCA No.26/2009 before the Rent Control Appellate Authority North Paravur, that authority will ensure that, that application is considered favourably and a copy is issued to the petitioner (if the copy application is otherwise in order) at the earliest and at any rate within ten days from today. ii). If the petitioner is yet to file an application for urgent copy, the petitioner will file such copy application at least by tomorrow. If he files an emergent copy application at least by tomorrow, the appellate authority will ensure that, the copy application is favourably considered and copy is issued to the appellant within 15 days from today. WPC.No.17900/2010 3 iii). In view of the above directions, there will be a further direction to the Execution Court viz. the Munsiff Court, North Paravur which is considering E.P. No.332/2009 not to order and effect delivery of the building, which is subject matter of RCP No.16/2008, for a period of three weeks from today. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM , JUDGE dpk