IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2009 / 14TH JYAISHTA 1931 CRP.No. 1123 of 2004() ------------------------------- ELEOP.155/2002 of ADDL.DISTRICT COURT,KOTTAYAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2: ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.S.E.BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-4. 2. THE ASST.EXE. ENGINEER, ELE. SUB DIVISION, KSEB, PALA. BY ADV. MR.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/3RD PETITIONER: ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.S.MOHANAN, S/O.K.P.SANKARANKUTTY MARAR, AGED 50 YEARS, GOVERNMENT SERVANT, RESIDING AT KOTTARATHIL HOUSE, CHOONDACHERRY P.O., PLASANEL PALAI. 2. SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (LAND ACQUISITION) FOR KSEB, KOTTAYAM. R1 BY ADV. MR.MATHEW PHILIP THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.R.P. NO.1123/2004 ORDER ON I.A. NO.2723/2004 IN C.R.P. NO.1123/2004 DISMISSED 04/06/2009. SD/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rs/ S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------- C.R.P.NO.1123 OF 2004 () ----------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of June, 2009 O R D E R The revision is filed against the granting of enhanced compensation in a proceedings under Section 10 and 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act read with Section 51 of the Indian Electricity Act and Section 42 of the Indian Electricity Supplies Act. The petitioner, a statutory authority, has filed this revision challenging the enhanced compensation awarded to the respondents towards cutting of valuable trees standing in his property on account of the drawing of electric line over that property. After perusing the order impugned in the revision and hearing the counsel of both sides at length, I find no scope for any interference. The learned Additional District Judge, after meticulous examination of the materials produced and applying the principles of law applicable has awarded only reasonable compensation to the respondents, and no challenge against that order survives for consideration. It is CRP.1123/04 2 also submitted that the enhanced compensation had already been deposited by the revision petitioner, K.S.E.B. and received by the respondents. Revision is dismissed. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE prp S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. -------------------------------------------------------- CRL.R.P.NO. OF 2006 () --------------------------------------------------------- O R D E R --------------------------------------------------------- 23rd March, 2009