IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI THURSDAY, THE 20TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 29TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 30603 of 2008(R) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- KRISTRAJ, S/O.SESHAYA, KARIMBALIL VEEDU, ULIYACOVIL , KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM DISTRICT, KOLLAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION. 3. SASI,(POLICE CONSTABLE) KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION. 4. SENTHILKUMAR, CHITRA AND CO., VADAYATTUKOTTA, KOLLAM. R1 & R2 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. BENJAMIN PAUL, R4 BY ADV. SRI.DILEEP P.PILLAI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.30603/2008-R: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBIT: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE PETITION BEFORE THE R.1. DTD. 13/10/2008. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. prv. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== W.P.(C)NO. 30603 OF 2008 ============================ DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2008 JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair,J. The petitioner has approached this court alleging that Respondents 2 and 3 are harassing him at the instance of the 4th respondent. The petitioner's father, who is no more, was engaged in bakery business. For the said business, he purchased peanuts from the 4th respondent's shop and some amounts were remaining unpaid at the time of death of his father. But, later his mother cleared the amounts due to the 4th respondent. Alleging that further amounts are due to him, he filed a petition before the second respondent against the petitioner. Based on that petition, the petitioner was summoned to the police station and unnecessarily harassed by the police, it is submitted. 2. The learned Government Pleader, upon instructions, submitted that the 4th respondent filed a petition before the WPC.30603/2008 -2- police complaining that the petitioner abused him when the 4th respondent asked for payment of the money due to him. To enquire into that complaint, the petitioner was summoned to the police station. The learned Government Pleader further submitted that the police have no intention whatsoever to harass the petitioner. Recording the submission of the learned Government Pleader that the police have no intention to harass the petitioner, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE Sd/- M.C. HARI RANI, JUDGE ks. WPC.30603/2008 -3-