IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28494 of 2008 NABI RASOOL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 25/08/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the C.B.I. A complaint was made by Deputy C.V.O. (A), N.E. Railway, Gorakhpur that a cheque of Rs. 1796/- issued in favour of Md. Israil had gone missing. A fraud was attempted by interpolating the cheque by adding disbursement amount and making it as Rs. 9,75,574/- in favour of General Engineering Works. The cheque could not be paid. In course of investigation it transpires that the petitioner is the introducer of account holder. Submission is that the amount could not be disbursed and the petitioner is not named in the FIR. He is in custody since 5.12.2007. Learned counsel representing the CBI opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submitted that the petitioner was the introducer of the account holder which was being used for commission of fraud and charge sheet has been submitted in this case. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Nabi Rasool is directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Spl. Judicial Magistrate, C.B.I., Patna in connection with R.C. Case No. 3 (S) of 2002. avin. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)