IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30304 of 2010 CHANGEJ ALAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 03.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody in a case registered under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the two mobiles of the informant were recovered from Ashok Kumar Gupta. Ashok Kumar Gupta, the other similarly situated accused has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 21453 of 2010. In view of such, let the petitioner, namely, Changej Alam be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha in connection with Bagaha P.S. Case No. 156 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors shall be the brother of the petitioner and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will 2 Praveen ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.