IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- C rl. WP No. 1589 of 2009 Date of decision: 11.01.2010 Abdur Rehman ........ petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Ms Sangeeta Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ravish Kaushik, AAG, Haryana for the respondent -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) In pursuance to the order dated 08.12.2009, a Warrant Officer was appointed. As per the report, submitted by the Warrant Officer, it could not be concluded that the alleged detenues were being illegally detained or there was any obstruction of whatsoever nature to hamper their free movement. Learned counsel for the petitioner also states that in view the report dated 14.12.2009 submitted by the Warrant Officer , this petition be dismissed as infructuous. Ordered accordingly. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge January 11, 2010 mohan