IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 29TH AUGUST 2011 / 7TH BHADRA 1933 OP (FC).No. 2653 of 2011(R) --------------------------- OPHMA.570/2007, OP.NO.614/2007, OP(HMA) NO.634/008 AND OP.NO.199/2010 of FAMILY COURT,KOLLAM .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- PRIYA SATHYAPAL, D/O.SATHYAPALA PANICKER, PRIYALAM (PARATHIMOOTTIL) EDAKULANGARA PO, KARUNAGAPALLY PIN 690 562. BY ADVS. SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEWS, SRI.JOSEPH RONY JOSE. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. ANOOP, S/O.SAKTHIDAHARAN, CHALLLIYIL,S.V.COTTAGE, MARUNOORKULANGARA SOUTH, ALUMKADAVU PO, KARUNAGAPALLY PIN 690 573. 2. SAKTHIDHARAN, S/O.BALAKRISHNA PANICKER,CHALLLIYIL,S.V.COTTAGE, MARUNOORKULANGARA SOUTH,ALUMKADAVU PO, KARUNAGAPALLY PIN 690 573. 3. VALSALA,W/O.SAKTHIDHARAN, CHALLLIYIL,S.V.COTTAGE,MARUNOORKULANGARA SOUTH, ALUMKADAVU PO,KARUNAGAPALLY PIN 690 573. THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss OP(FC) NO.2653/2011 R APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF OP(HMA) NO.570/2007. P2: COPY OF OP.NO.614/2007. P3: COPY OF O.P.NO.199/2010. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan & K.Surendra Mohan, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = OP(FC).No.2653 of 2011-R = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 29th day of August, 2011. Judgment Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. 1.The petitioner is the wife of the first respondent. Respondents 2 and 3 are the parents of the first respondent. There are four litigations, namely, OP(HMA).No.570/2007, OP (HMA).No.634/2008, OP.No.614/2007 and OP. No.199/2010 between the parties, fundamentally relating to the matrimonial tie between the petitioner and the first respondent. 2.While the petitioner seeks a direction for early disposal of the aforesaid matters, we thought it fit to call for the report as it was mentioned that the case is referred for mediation. The office of the Family Court has informed the Registry that the cases were referred to OPFC.2653/11 -: 2 :- Mediation Centre and it did not ultimately materialize with the passage of more than six months. With this, we are satisfied that the parties should get ready for trial since the matrimonial litigations cannot linger long. Obviously, the respondents who have been served with notice through special messenger do not appear to have any objection to this because they do not appear to contest this matter. Having gone through the materials on record and having regard to the nature of the litigations and the report of the Family Court, we direct that the trial of the aforesaid four proceedings shall be taken up and proceeded with as expeditiously as possible as may be deemed fit by the learned Judge of the Family Court, Kollam. The original petition ordered accordingly. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. K.Surendra Mohan, Judge. Sha/0109