IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11214 of 2009 RAMJEET SINGH s/o late Ram Ayodhya Singh, resident of Mohalla- Salimpur Ahra, Lane no.1, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, Town and District-Patna. Versus 1. THE GOVERNOR,RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, Central Office Sahid Bhagat Singh Marg, Mumbai-400001. 2. The Principal Chief General Manager, Reserve Bank of India, Department of Administration & Personnel Management, Central Office, Mumbai-400001 (Maharastra.). 3.The Regional Director, Reserve Bank of India, South Gandhi Maidan, Patna-800001(Bihar). 4. Assistant General Manager, Department of Administration & Personnel Management, Central Office Building, Sahid Bhagat Singh, Marg, Mumbai- 400001.(Maharastra). ----------- 2 7.9.09 Petitioner alleges that he was given promotion. This promotion, he alleges, was withdrawn in the year 2004. In the year 2004 thereafter he sought voluntary retirement and retired. He now challenges those actions by this writ petition in 2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that he was representing against these wrongful actions and consequential denial of commensurate retirement benefits. My attention was drawn to Annexure 4, purported disposal of his representation , as done in 2009. The said order clearly points out that he was granted promotion on his first option made. That was withdrawn on petitioner’s second option whereafter he sought voluntary retirement. Thus, there was no merit in his representation Petitioner in the entire writ petition has not denied this assertion much less specifically. If that be so, the writ petition is not maintainable and is dismissed as such. singh (Navaniti Prasad Singh,J)