Writ Petitwn No.4.o96of 2003^ PETITTONER: .•••" <y' .<^\^-' <?• ^^.-•v ^y ©aneshRam, S/o Late Anjur Singh 6ond, Ayed 75 years, Occupation; Cultivator, R/o Vlllcoe: Amlibhouna, Tehsil & District: RGi9srh (£ '.) Versus RESPONDENTS; ^•-^ ^^'l^^f^! iy' '> .^ ,f -^ ^"'•^ T^, i^X^rl>^ ^'^ .•A -r^^s'^ ^' -f '*^< .<•* 1. Fcgooiai. S/o Chamar Singh. 2. Bhahangoo, S/c Kushloii, R/o Nawapara, 6isTrict; Raiqarh (C-6.) 3. Laxmin, Widow of Pancr- Ram. 4. Ramlat, S/o Panar Ram. 5. Ramboi, D/o Panak Ram, R/o AAahuapali, Tehsil & Csistrict; Raigarh (C.6.) 6. Setkunwa" niias 5emi, Widow of Anandram. 7. Suiochana, D/o Anandram, R/o Dolesara^ District; Raiaarh (C.6.) Ratna, D/o Anandram, R/o Amlibhouna, District: ftaigsrh {C.G.) 9. Mathurc, &/o Anandram. R/o Janjgir, Distriet; Raiaarh (C.6.) 10. Panchram, S/o Jhakalu. •-^.Y '•;:\ riya a!ias :ti, S/o Jhakalu. 11. 12. (Sanpot, S/o Anjir Singh i5ond, All belong to Caste: 6ond, sation; Cuitivation. l,d,4,&, 10 to 12, all ftesidents of Village: Amlibhouna, Tehsil & tsistrict: Raiqarh (C.G.) 13. S+pte of Chhat+isqarh, Throaoh: The Coliector, fto.igarh (C.G.) OF THE fi'; X1-HC-: sntn^ 1S? Wi:fe]"gftt < ^.:.K.:MS?.^P.2^ siRg •s^aiwrfl's 15-4-2004 Shri Prashaiit Mishrsl, Shri Sandeep Dubey, AppUcation for urgen^ Heard. The grievan.ee of the which is a transfer petitio^ Procedure, was presented 10-2001 and it is stfll pendency of M.J.C. No. l' Suit No. 191-A of 2002 CivU Suit No. 93-A of 2001 place as fhe recoids of District Judge, Raigarh 14/2001. Shri Mishra has filed No. 14/2001. The order sh^ adjoumed on niaay a date two years and six inonths| been called for, the niatter^ say that such niatters need Haviag considered aad iiiaterial on record, it i^ early as possible positivelj^ ^roduction of a copy of thi^ , Adv. for the petitioner. Paael Lawyer for fhe State/^-0 hearing is allowed. thk '^l<lI<?)4M ^TR5ff "^ I^St' ^siiiOTsn^r ^y pe^idui; fildd bdth duilui' petitioner is fhat M.J.C. No. 14/2001 under Section 24 of fhe Code of Civil the respondents No. 1 to 12 on 24- iding. It is subinitted that because of / 2001, the entire proceedings of Civit by the respondents No. 1 to 12 aad ffled by the petitioner are not taking fhe cases have been caUed by the iag fhe couse ofhearingofM.J.C. No. ;opies oforder sheets passed iu M.J.C. :ets go to show fhat the case has been |on oae count or fhe ofher. More than have passed. Since fhe records have are aot proceediug at all. Needless to priority. facts and Gircuinstances of the case directed-that fbe inatter be decided as within a nionfh froiu the date of order. If required, the niatter be heard [^iSa^ XI-HC-22; sn^T'w 'fs'ri^sn^r wmr'HS'a A ^3^::Swii'iB,?w^i*i®,!iRi5(w3<fc . t^..:.jEa^o^..4(5^/<o. '200rr ai^ui^ents day to day tiU fhe decided. Parties inust coo^ brought to fhe notice of fonvarded to the Addl. Regiji Wifh this observatio4 Certified copy as per| •=bl'')Icl''il-) ^Wdf'?ft%t <(»1<<;K ^TSlPgqsiI^I are concluded aad fhe xuatter is ^erate. Non-cooperation, if aay, shall be ^his Court. Copy of fhe order ^e^ alsol^ ^trar (Judl.)^^"^ Awl clACT»-^c: \, this petition is disposed of. hiles. ' /