;®~' c-^- f -°o L^ SC?r^?C£.-m.iL^<)->- BEFORETHE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SftXY- WRIT PETITIOlfNO.^3^0 /2006 PETITIONER \^/^^ ^K^ c>y ..-•' <?• /"' ("AS^'' .^•.^y ^'^'<0>'''' .^•' o?"" y .« ,<f;y RESPONDENTS ^ 1. A ;c^t1r^ ^KSS/sS^ %..:A •^:' ? / r'.C ^' ><-^ ^ W *.'F\-^.f p^ '^^ \p /Smt. Pushpa Toppo, W/o. Shri P.C. Toppo, Aged about 46 years, Working as Assistant Teacher in Governinent Girls Primary School, Naila, Development Block Nawagarh, Distt. Janjgir-Chanipa (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Sehool Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Thfe District Education Officer, District Janjgir-Champa (C.O.). 3. The Principal, Goveminent Girls Prunary School, Naila, Development jBlock Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4. TheCoUector, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2^6/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT/WRITS.ORDER/ORDERS.DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS IN NATURE OF WRITS OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. ^^^^^^^'^•'' ^SL—_ XI-HC-78 *11*1WI Sh+<ich 3 T rt||<<|M<<, (Sixnu'16, Rlt-IK-fy .^f^.^oA^. ^ 200 STI^T q5RT (l^3qc?r) aTl^T^irf?^ cf^T3TT^?Taz4|cb ^^ ^ S^IWHfN'SD^T 17.8. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Advoca|te for the petitioner. Shri Satish ©upta,Dy. (5ovt. Heard. The only grievance raised b)j ^dv. for the State on advance copy. per Rctionalization Scheme, 2006 i^i case of surplus teachers in any school, then oniy the junior most teachers 4 be transferred as per scheme. Whe^i junior teachers to the petitioner, tjut their names have not been included in the list and the name of the petitio^ner has been included in contravention of the scheme. Against this irregularity <& ill^ petitioner has the remedy to file ca/\ per- clause-7 of the rationalizatior bound to consider the grievance correct accor-ding to the scheme, anjj tg correct the same. Since the petitioner" has The time taken by the petit With the direction aforesaid Consequently, M.OV.)P. No.33 Certified copy as per rules. +l-i|ffl^l-< WRff if fS^S ifil'tdK S|;3ri^T3n^r the petitioner in this petition is that as •e to be included in the surplus list and to •eos, in the present case, there are many igolity committed by the respondents, the appeal before the appellate authority os scheme and the appeilate authority is >f the petitioner, if the same is found equally efficacious alternative remedy available, therefore, he should ^re-fer an appeal befor-e the oppellate authority and the authority to consiiRer the points r-aised by the petitioner'. Ipner 'm filing this petition till its disposal shatl be eondoned in preferr'ing the ^ppeal before the appellate author-ity. the petition stands disposed of. ^7/06 also stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge i") ^4