(1) CA. 10518.2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10518 OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 735 OF 2007 Sayyad Meer Sayyad Mohammad .. Applicant VERSUS Nurjahan Sayyad Yousuf and ors. .. Respondents Mr. K.G.Khader, Advocate for the applicant-appellant Mr. N.V. Gaware, Advocate for the respondents CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 21ST AUGUST, 2009 P.C.:- 1] Heard. Since the appeal is admitted, the decree for partition is required to be stayed. The learned Advocate appearing for the respondents suggested that the proceedings for partition should be continued except that the appellant’s possession should not be disturbed. This piecemeal proceedings would not benefit any party and would cause unnecessary expenses. 2] The application deserves to be allowed. There shall be stay to the execution of the impugned decree, till the disposal of the appeal. The appellant shall however, abide by the direction of (2) CA. 10518.2007 the decree not to alienate his un-divided share in the suit property. 3] Civil Application disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (A.V. NIRGUDE, J.) arp