«' ,.^:R?? i^'i-C1^ v^yy' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTtSGARH: BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRff PETmON (Ct N0.5871 OF 2008 Satish Kumar Mandloi, S/o B.L Mandloi, aged aboiA 22 years, R/o Bharkhapara, Ward No.26, Rajnanc^aon, District Rajnandgaon (CG). -~ Versus 1. Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, through the Vtee Chancellor, Univeraity Campus, Raipur (CG). 2. Registrar, Indira Gandhi Agricuttural Univereity, Univeraty Campus, Raipur 3. Director/Controtler, Department of Director of Instructfons & Controller of Examination, Indira Gandhi Agricuttural University, University Campus, Raipur 4. Principal, Shri Ram College of Agriculture, Thakurtola, Rajnandgaon, Di^rict Rajnandgaon (CG), Afflliated by Indira Gandhl Agricultural University, Raipur (CG). (Writ petition under Articte 226/227 of the Constifartion of tndia) Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri F.S. Khare, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, counsel for the respondents No.1to3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 22nd day of January, 2009) Wtth the consent of teamed counsel appearing for ttie (arties, the petition is heard finally. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has passed all the subjecte, however, (tepitethesald fact N ^ •b,•SSV .<!» 2-' the petitioner has been found failed in the second semester of first year and, as such, he is not permBted to appear in third year. 3) Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents No.1 to 3 submits that the petitioner may be granted o(yortunity to present his case before the aincerned authority. The petitioner would be heard and appropriate order will be passed in accordance vrith law. e"r 4) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner does not controvert the above submission made by leamed counsel for the respondents No.1 to 3. 5) In view of the foregoing, the petjtionet is directed to gppear tefore the Registrar of the ri^tiQndentCUraversity on 2&-1-2009 along with all the retevant documente in support of his submission. Thereafter, the Registrar is directed to consMer the case of the petitioner and pass appropriate order, in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner. 6) Accordingly, the petition ^anctedisposed of. 7) Consequently, IA.No.1 also stands dteposed <rf. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agi Judge