IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3272 of 2007 SHYAM NANDAN PRASAD SINHA, SON OF LATE NANAK PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA SHASHTRI NAGAR, SIPAHI TOLA, P.S. MADHUBANI CHOWK, DISTRICT PURNEA. ---PETITIONER Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PURNEA. 3.THE TREASURY OFFICER, PURNEA. 4.THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. ---RESPONDENTS ----------- 2. 22.4.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent-State stating to the effect that the entire terminal/retiral dues have been paid to the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the statements made in the counter affidavit, a copy of which has been served on him, the petitioner does not want to press this writ application. In view of the above submission, the writ application is dismissed as not pressed. However, it will be open for the petitioner to agitate if the statement made in the counter affidavit is not found correct. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)