IN THE HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPLIR WRTT PETmON N0. ./200: PETITIONER Asgar A'i S/o Syed Zakir Ali aged about 45yrs, R/o Zakir House Lormi P.S. Distt-Biiaspur (C.G.) - VERSUS RESPONDENTS w^-^^--'' .C.-' '••''^^y'' ^yft'i" ^y y ^, o c\' -> lii't.'1 ^ ''V State ofChhattisgarh through Secretary Home Department, D.K.S. Bhawau, Raipur (C.G.) Director General ofPolice, Raipur (C.G.) Superintendent ofPolice Bilaspur(C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer Police, P.S.-Kota (C.G.) Prakhar Pandey (S.D.O.P) Kota Police Station 6. Officer Incharge P.S. Lormi Dist- Bilaspur(C.G.) 4 <-y WtUT PETmON UNDER ARTICLES 226/327 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIOBARL (-HC-22 snt^r^ii ^FIWS'l^ h «[$(! rjs^ryl ssisisia c^j..';-*-:—• 'S^ 'vww^, a-alwis, iaK'iiuy 'iWWT VhW<*> ..<A?.'.r;...^.Q.^..5: SII^t^gTWHf^f °»i«i(<-i<3-[*ii*«it'?iyS <h(^i< ^aiPtnantg 05.11.2003 Smt. Hamida Siddique, cour^al for the petitioner. Shri Praveen &as. Ponel La^yer for the S'tate/respondents. Heard bo-th the counsel. I The main grievance of thej petitioner is 1+iat on the complaint of the petitioner on 16.08.2002, t:rime No.108/2002 for the offences punishable under Sections 504, ^96, 153 and 355 of the I.P.C. has been registered in Potice Station: Lorjmi agamst two police officers, but till ckite the investigation has not b^en completed and report has not been submitted to the concemed Couh". Therefore, a writ in the nature of mandamus may be issued and tt|e respondents be directed to file •the charge sh^t before the comjie-tent Court. It has further been A-csrft.uw^^ mentioned •riiat no fw/^lfisr effiojffiious remedy is left with the petitiolier but to approach this Court by wa^ of fiting the present petition. It is not correct that 1fie petitioner has no other altemative efficacious remedy available 4ecouse. under the Code of Criminal Procedure the petitioner is erftitled to file a complaint before -the concerned Judicial Atagistrate u()der Section 200 of The Cr.P.C. and The concerned Atogistrate after foll^wing •the procedure as enviaoged in the Cr.P.C. can proceed with •the ifiatter. Therefore, I do not find any aibstonce in this writ petition, ^s alternative remedy is available to the XI-HC-22 STi^rqi •!^1?T3II^T sh'^i'* 'gftg lSs!s«S iqs""-. Soma ~3^ 'fiwi, i»ti1^'i6,'fefray ^;^?, (*5 WiRwanKicb ~^ sn^i VRDW ^fsa- -2- In view of -this order, I.A.N<| <fi!^i<?i'41t fVf^ ^ ^ef <R?i^!< ^? sifigi; 3(KW petitioner. The petition is ther^fore, liable to be rejected and it is accordingly, rejected. .9093/2003 stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C.BHADOO