l^ hw^c 33^/<^ HI©HCOIJRT 0s CHHATHS^RH AT BIL^a»im .4poe-Hant Non^Dg||cant^No^3 •^ K^- K®s99r*di®r>t Appllcant Nc?.2 AooliCQnt N9.3 Arol'co-nt No.4 ,4E?Dllcc*nt No,,5 '^.sotlcant No.^ M.A, rO (PR) NoJT29 e»f ^008. Monager Unjted In.surance Company Limited, Branch "Tara Compiex, 6,E,ftoad, Po^^r Hoyse Bhilai, Distt.w8hijaj ^,^,) Versus 1. Smt- AAarpta Verma, W/o-Uste Lomesh Verma, aged-30 years, 2. Nlkhl! Verma, S/o-Late Lorpesh Vermo, aged-ymonths Mlnor.through; .Mother-Smt,..MamtQ, Verma (respondent No,l) 3< Banshi La! Vernia, S/o-Late Khojan LaS Verma, aged-SS years, r^: :.,.^'/' Non-a&pJJeGnt No.l Non-QpRlicant No.2 4.. Ratesh Xijmar, S/o-Banshi LjaS Verma, aged-29 years, Dane.shwar, S/o--Banshi La! Verma, agcd- 27 years, Ky. Pr'iya, D/o-Banshl Lai Vermo, aged-17 years, AAinor, through; father-BanshibJ Verma (respondent No3) Respondent No.l to 6 AJI are R/o Vll'oge Hathkhoj, P.S.-Bhilai-S, Djstt.-Durg //* ^\ (c.a.) 7. Nazlm Khan, S/o Haklm Khan, aged obout 31 years, ft/o Siitia Mandir Power House Bhiiai, P.S-Chhaoni Bhilai, &istt.Durg (C.<y.) (Driver) 8. Istekhar Ahmad, S/o'Mohammad Jahur, a9ed about 38 years, R/o-Qtr.No.9 B Road Avenue C, Sector-1, P.S<rt-Bhl!ai Bhatti, TQh.^Distt.-Gurg (C.S.)(owrter) (APPEAL U/S'17.3 OF THE MOTOft VBHICLE ACT) <.< Hon'ble Mr. T,P. Sharma. J.) Mr-> Dashrath ^upta, counsel for the appel.Jo.nt. B/- ^asssd on 4th Mearsh. 20Q9) The appeilant has filed tt?js o.ppea! agalnst 1+ie. interirp award dated 3.3.2008 pas^ed by the Second Additiona! AAotor Accident CioJr'p Tribuna!, Durg, in 'Ciaim Case No<20/07 whe.re.by thc iearned Cteim Trib.una! has passed the jnterim award of Rs<50,000/- imder Section 140 of the ^otor Vehjcle Ae.t against ihe appeJJant HearcS on the application for exemption from flHng certified copy of the order passed under SBCtion 170 of the Motor Vehic.ie Act. The appiication isalbwed.. Learned coynsel for the appelJant sybrnJts ttiat 1+ie cteimants had lodged the FJ.R. after lapse of 6 mon-riis Jn ^hich they hove stated that the offendjng vehjcie was driven by non-appiicant NoJ Nazim ond oi^ned by non-appllcant N0,8 Istekhar Ahmad whlch was Insured wilfi thc present appeljant, whJch'is-not reiiabieand the Court below has corpmjtted an jjlegQiity in awarding interim corppensation under 'no fauit ijabjjjty' against the appelSant. T hove perused the ©rderJmpugned^ It revea.h that the owner and cirsver have fiied their written statement in whlch they have. speciflca!!y admitted the accldent but denled the facttim of negli.gence. On the.basis of .admisslon on behalf of the driyer relatlng to 'the accident, the Court bebw has passed the irppugned interlm award, I do not fhd any iiiegoJlty or jnfirmit^ in the order impugned. Consequently, the q^peaJ belng devoid of merit Is Jjable to be dismissed and it Is hereby dismlssed. No order as to costs. i Sd/- ; T.P. Sharma \ Judge