1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS. 151/07, 135/07, 136/07, 137/07, 141/07, 143/07, 144/07, 152/07. Commissioner of Income Tax .vs. Smt. Urmilabai Bharukha , etc. ________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders. Registrars orders. CORAM: A.P. LAVANDE & R.V. MORE, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 7, 2007. Heard Mr. A.S. Jaiswal, learned Counsel for appellant and Mr. S. Kabra, learned Counsel for respondent. Mr. A.S. Jaiswal, learned Counsel for appellant, states that all these appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act will have to be filed before Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court, which will have jurisdiction to deal with these appeals. This position has not been disputed by Mr. Kabra, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents. Mr. A.S. Jaiswal, learned Counsel for appellant, states that the entire record of the appeals be returned to the appellant and the appellant is ready to place xerox copy of the same for the purpose of record. Since the appeals have to be filed before Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court, we direct the Registry to return the appeals with Annexures thereof to the appellant with permission to the appellants to keep on record xerox copies of the same for the purpose of record. The appeals are permitted to be withdrawn subject to the above directions. The appeals stand disposed of. J. JUDGE. JUDGE.