AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.865 OF 2009 ALONG WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.255 OF 2009 Sanjay Sankataprasad Singh ... Petitioner Vs. B.M.C. & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Rahul Mehta i/b Mr. Dinesh Kumar Shukla for the petitioner. Mr. Girish Kulkarni with Mr. B.A. Rumao for the applicant. Ms. Shobha Ajitkumar for respondent 1. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C.:- 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is awaiting for certain information under the Right to Information Act, 2002 (for short, “the RTI Act”). He states that the petitioner wants to file a fresh petition AJN 2 making averments based on the information received by him under the RTI Act. He seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to take out appropriate proceedings. 2. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to adopt appropriate proceedings in accordance with law after obtaining information under the RTI Act. 3. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Needless to say that in view of the disposal of writ petition, Chamber Summons No.255 of 2009 shall also stand disposed of. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.]