XI-HC—78 § @ 3am,m,W Wm 'W42‘m7k‘9gig 200 ' WEST$IW Wm(W) mmffwm ammma: wwwm %mmmr 13-7-2006 w Shri Amit Sharma, counsel far the petitioner, Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy G ovt. Advocate for the State. Heard both the counsel. At the outset, Shri Gupta submitted that inadvertently in the impugned order the name of district has been mentioned as Raigarh whereas, the place where the peti ioner has been transferred felts in the Distriet Dantewada, a corrigendum to that effect has aiso been issued and Xerox copy of the same has atso b en submitted, Learned counset for the pe itioner, at this stage, submitted that on in he be allowed to withdraw this account of change circumstances may petition with iiberty to tile fresh writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petitior is dismissed as withdrawn with tiberty aforesaid Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.2626/2006 also stands dtsposed oft l Sd/- l L.C. Bhadoo Judge Q) Barve " ‘ WW