ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.3069 OF 2008 PETITION NO.3069 OF 2008 PETITION NO.3069 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.Nitin P.Deshpande for the Petitioner. Mr.Amogh Paralikar for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 25th November, 2008. : 25th November, 2008. : 25th November, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. The Petitioner has challenged the impugned order whereby, the learned Small Causes Judge, Pune observed that there is no proper justification is given, but in order to give fair and sufficient opportunity to Defendants to put their defence and also in the interest of natural justice, it is necessary to allow the defendants to file their written statement for adjudication of the matter in all points. ( 2 ) 2. In view of this, I see there is no reason to interfere with the same order at the instance of Plaintiff. 3. Taking all this into account, there is no case made out to interfere with the same under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Petition is, therefore, dismissed. . No costs. [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]