IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10407 of 2010 RAGHUNANDAN SINGH, S/O LATE RADHA SINGH, R/O VILLAGE PURANIA, P.O. NEORA,P.S.- BIHTA, DISTRICT- PATNA RETIRED NATIONAL DISCIPLINE INSTRUCT GOVT. OF BIHAR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, ART, CULTURE AND YOUTH DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR. 2. THE SECRETARY, ART, CULTURE AND YOUTH DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR,VIKASH BHAWAN, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR YOUTH WELFARE CUM JOINT SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR,VIKASH BHAWAN, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER,PATNA. 5. THE DIRECTOR , G.P.F. GOVT. OF BIHAR, PANT BHAWAN, PATNA. 6. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER,PATNA. 7. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL,BIHAR,BIRCHAND PATEL MARG,PATNA. 8. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, U.P.ALLAHABAD. ----------- 2 07.07.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the Accountant General. It is submitted that the petitioner superannuated on 31st January, 1999 from the post of National Discipline Scheme Instructor (NDSI) while working under the respondent no.4. It is further submitted that upon superannuation the petitioner was paid the provident fund dues, however the same being found to be not correct petitioner represented before the District Provident Fund Officer, Patna vide Annexure-6. It is further contended that the respondent-State as per its letter no. 348 dated 2nd December, 2009 allowed the benefits of first and second time bound promotion to similarly situated employees including the petitioner vide Annexure-7. The name of the petitioner finds place at sl no. 65 of the list enclosed to the said letter. It is also contended that the prayer of the petitioner is that the - 2 - authorities should give effect to the aforesaid promotional order as contained in Annexure-7 and the necessary monetary benefits flowing from that be extended to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be considered at the earlier as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner represented his grievances by filing representation on 31st May, 2010 to the respondent no.4 however the same has not been considered till date besides the representation of the petitioner for ventilating his grievances with regard to provident fund dues as contained in Annexure-6 addressed to the District Provident Fund Officer, Patna which has also remained unconsidered till date, and as such, for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.3 for the grievances with regard to monetary benefits flowing from Annexure-7 and a separate representation before the respondent no.6 for his grievances that the provident fund dues have not been paid to him correctly. In such view of the matter, in case such representations stating details of unpaid claims is filed by - 3 - the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the respective representations shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable may also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. The respondent no.6 while making further payment of the provident fund dues, if any, shall also provide calculation chart. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)