HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR DlVlSlON BENCH CCRAM : HON’BLE SHRI H.L. DATTU, CJ & HON’BLE SHR! V.K. $HRIVASTAVA, J. WRIT PETITION NO. 2428 OF 2001 PETITIONER Durga Prasad Agrawa! S/o Sadhulalji Agrawal Aged about 6O years Rlo Nevra, Tah. Ti!da, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) E 3 Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State Bank of India Through its Branch 1. Manager Nevra, Tah. Tilda ‘ Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Regional Manager State Bank of India Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Debt Recovery Tribunai Through its Recovery Dfficer, 797-2, Shanti Kunj. South Civil Lines. , Jabaipur (Madhya Pradesh) i Present : Shri Sanjay K. Agrawai, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sunil Sahu, counsei for respondents No.1 and 2. ORAL OEDER (Passed on 9‘“ March, 2607) The following oral order of‘the Court was passed by H.L. Dattu, CJ. A defaulter, who had defaulted in paying the amounts due to the Bank. is before us in this petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution. The relief sought for in the writ petition is to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for settlement under the scheme of the Reserve Bank of lndia dated 27—7-2000. . , f, “Mae‘s!” 2) This Court while entertaining the writ petition had granted an interim order of stay subject to the petitioner deposited a sum of Rs.5,28,000/— within a particular time frame. 3) Since the petitioner had not complied with the orders and directions issued by this Court, this Court vide order dated 27-10—2004 has vacated the interim order granted eariier. 4) The order so passed was some time in the year 2004 and since then much water has fiown under the bridge. At this stage, it ma¥tnot be possibie and permissible to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for one time settlement. 5) ln that View of the matter, we decline to entertain this writ petition. Accordingly the writ petition is rejected. 0rdered accydingly. Sd/— 1 Vijay Kumar Shrivastava r ‘Judge Sdl- 3- chief Justice 9, VJ