:1: :1: :1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10310 OF 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s Orders Orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------- M.V.Limaye for the petitioners. Mr.S.S.patwardhan for the Respondents. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 16TH FEBRUARY,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. When notice was issued on this Writ petition, it is apparent that no stay of further proceedings has been granted. Notice was issued on April 28, 2005. Now, we are in 2008. In the meanwhile, the petitioners who are in Original Defendants in Sp.Civil Suit No. 268 of 2004 have filed their Written Statement, amended it, and now even issues are framed. In such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served by entertaining this petition. Petition :2: :2: :2: is dismissed. 2. Even otherwise, I am satisfied from the perusal of the Application that the same was not in accordance with the requirements stipulated under Section 8(1)(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The prayer in the same appears to be a composite one and that is how the Application has been decided and dealt with. This is one more ground for not interfering with the impugned order. sd/- ********