'^ c»r BEEORE THEHIGHGOURTQFCHHAmSGARH ATBILASFUR SlngleBench Cr.M.P. No.t'?2-} of2011 PETITIONER Raghunath S/o Purushottam, aged about 50 years, R/o Qr. P.R.KB......52.^2^..»...... 7 No 4 E, Street - 49, Sector-n, i^»^hr^^.%^^M^<'zbne~2' P.S.-Khiirshyar, Bat«....A^^,^,..,,^... : Bhilai,Distt. Dui^ (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT Sanjay Kumar Naidu S/o P.K. Naidu, aged about 48 years, R/o Ram Nagar, Near Pive temple, BhUai TahsU & Distt. Durg(C.G.) PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF GODE OF CRIMINALPROCEDURE K ll:ii« t. 'i'n IE i r i BU(pu»d 8( a»B3 84»|eift 6u»e?s Xg jspjs ayt pauuy^e seu ^tno3ieu6is(Aay psiuest siji 'UOISIA&J ui •lUSturtSLie (euy J<y (»xySBM escs aw pue p&sop SBM ssguaiM sauaisp SUIUIBXB Cf» A3nunt.iodd& pue j)ss» i:1oz'N)'90 uo uonE»jjdde pifes BIR ^»®»ISadseyNeJlSjBew lasiues) &4i •ua^Baq suiii 8J<y8Jsyi (»i8 pucoaj syi ui siqeiieAe lou Si li8dx& BuouM-pueii evi Aq peuiyrexB aq 01 sew tpiyM wsiunoop 8i|} leya uoReaiidde ue p^jiStioiBjisd SMI TTOZ'W90 uo 'suift ultjtiw 38^ sssaojd fiu^ed ,»o pesas ui •TTOZ'ZO'TZ psiep J8pjo gpiA sAep U&ASS UftfflM att> ssaaoud Aed 01 papsjip sew j&uoiMl&d &43 pue ;paAMiB»t8M ^adx®BU):NJM-puei< BuKllBO Jcy JS'uoiinsd 84»^ pe)to ucuiBOitdde &in ieiR sjesclde ^ stu&uunsop &4) ui<ud •z •6jna •BiifcqstteM tBOIpnc SM? Aq |»ssBd(e-d s.inxsuuv) TTOZ*'W)*90 iWBl^ Jafuo Sij? Butuuy^e TTOZ ^o £8'ON UOISIA&^ iBUjtuyo ui fijnQ 'sBpnr suojssss leuooippvsyi Aq presed T:ioZ"SO"6T ^tftp ^apao &Ml 3suie6e paaa&iip Sj uoiiiiad luessjd stu. ^' •uoissftupe uo pjeaH (ITOZ-90'^1:) jLN3ws>anc ^fWXWWVWSMZSS AQ3m03^3NJ.d*0 3»frNQUK»SllSKINn NCUAIAad •jeuBoi^d ewjo^jssunco 'AepeAdssptBC yys ^ npieN J&iun^ Aetues y^unyfiey lN3aNOdS3M snsysA ITOZ JO TZE "ON -d •W •^ (4aB|B*ija JW|Uj|i4d asjisnr •iw 'UOH) andSviiaj.vHavssii-ufHH3doj.ano3HOiH <^1 s^.^ 9-^ —2- since 2000, the evldence of the eomptainant was elesed on 11.01.2005 andsince 23.02.2005 th& case was belna listed for defenee witness. Further the Revtsioi»al Court has observed that as the petitloner falted to comply e order, the leamed Maffistrate was justffied »n refustng to grant furthai opporturoty. r " 3. Coflsidenng alt the .facts of the case, t flnd no ground te Interfere wlth the present petftion fileduncler Sectton 482 oft theCodeofCrlnrtlnalProcedure.Theorcferpasse<^bytt'(6tw^ Courts t?etow Is In aGCordance wlth" law aBft rwffict rw» Interference. ACTordtogly, thepettti©nbetag.witha.it sut?stan% (s llable to be dtsmlssed. tt is a<»Qrc|tngty dlsmi^ed. The leamed Magfstrate Is ctireGtect t& deqicte^ l^; case immediately in accordanee wlth law. ^^ KSS,• BS 8SH SS& tSSSM B