IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1406 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4261 of 2006 With Interlocutory Application No. 6781 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.1406 of 2011. ====================================================== Awadh Bihari Pandey, son of late Jagdish Pandey, resident of Village – Naudiha, P.S. Imamganj, Dist. – Gaya, at present, posted as Assistant Teacher in T. Model Half Time Industrial Middle School, Gaya .... .... Petitioner … Appellant Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna 3. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Gaya 4. The District Education Officer, Gaya 5. The District Superintendent of Education, Gaya 6. Head Master, T. Model Half Time Industrial Middle School, Gaya, 7. Secretary, T. Model Half Time Industrial Middle School, Gaya .... .... Respondents …. Respondents. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad Sinha, Advocate. For the Respondents 1-5 : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, GP 8 and Mr. Amarendra Kumar, AC to GP 8. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2 28-09-2011 Re. Interlocutory Application No. 6781 of 2011. The delay of 29 days occurred in filing the Letters Patent Appeal is condoned. Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. Patna High Court LPA No.1406 of 2011 (2) dt.28-09-2011 2 / 2 2 Re. Letters Patent Appeal No. 1406 of 2011. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 20th June 2011 passed by the learned single Judge in above CWJC No. 4261 of 2006, the writ petitioner has preferred this Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. The appellant, an Assistant Teacher in the respondent no. 6 - a non-government grant-in-aid Middle School, seeks regularization in service. Admittedly, earlier the three writ petitions in the same subject matter were dismissed by this Court. The learned single Judge has observed that neither at the time of his appointment nor till date the appellant has received training. Having regard to the orders made on the earlier writ petitions and the appellant being an untrained teacher, the writ petition has been rejected by the learned single Judge. We see no merit in this Appeal. Appeal is dismissed in limine. Dilip. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)