c IN THE HIGH COURI OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Writ peti-tion No. ^'-ho/2003. '"''''si'ii..,., '^^ PETITIONER ^— Oirdhari Lal Soni S/o. Sri Raja Ram Sonl Agcd abou-b- 52 years, Co-opera-tive Extension - Officer, Srang, R/o. Block- Arang, Distt - Raipur(C.G.) Versus RBSPONDENTS (1) S-tate of G.G. Throu^i s Secretary Department of Co- Operative Mantraiay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. (2) (3) Registrar Co-Operative Society Agriculture College, Labhandi Distt - Raipur (C.G.) Deputy Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Near Co-Operative Bank, Rajbandha - Raipur (C.G.) Din Bandhu Dargave Agei3 about- 52.years, Co-Operative Exten- sion Officer, Co-Operative Extension Bloc'k, /(A\4- Otagi, Dist-t- SargujatC.G.) ^l/r{\Ky ^ ^ _ , ' . , ' ^ l'l/,$? WB'ET PBriTION UNDER ARTICLE226/227 OP THE CONSTITUTION .0 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT XN THENATURE QF CEKEIATORlAlENDOlUS/ PROHIBITIONS _ _AND_OTHER_S3:ETABLE WRIT OR WRITS DIRECTION ;' OR DIRECTIONS/ ORDER OR ORDERS i HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Petitioner Writ Pfctition No. 3066 of 2003 Girdhari Lal Soni Versus Respondents : State ofChhattisgarh&others d* Siag^e Bendi: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satlsh K. AgaUiotrl. IS'SSgMiv Shri Maaoj Paraujape, cousnel, counsel for fhe Petitioner. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel lawycr for the respondents No. ItoS/State. Shri Ainiyakant Tiwari, counsel for thc respoxident No. 4. '&wsassf^ss ORAL ORDER (27& Februaiy, 2006) 1. This writ petition has bccn fited by Shri Gndhari Lal Soni, wbereia fhe transfer order dated 9.9.2003 was inipugned. This Court, after hearing learaed coiuisel fiw fhc parties, by order dated l.10.2003 directed the respondent No. 1 to <x»nsider fhc represeatatton of fhe petittoner, nanaicty Shri Gudhari Lal Soiu wifhin a pcriod of 30 days finoin the date of receipt of fhe representatton. The respondent No. 1 by order dated 5.12.2003 considered the representation of the petitioner namety Girdhari Lal Soiii and canceUed the impugned oider dated 9.9.2003, and as such, tfus petttion, as stated by teamed counscl for the pctitioner, has become mfiuctuous. 2. Accordiiigty, thra petition is disnusscd as haviag becomc infiuctuous. No order as to oosts. ——— satish K. Sd/- Eskt'i