Civil Revision No. 4586 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 4586 of 2010 Date of Decision: 13.8.2010 Manmohan Singh …Petitioner Versus Kashmiri Lal Jain …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Sukhwinder Singh Sudan, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that rent, at the rate of Rs.700/- per month, is being paid for the constructed area. It is further contended that the claim of the landlord that the open area was a separate tenancy, for which the petitioner is liable to pay Rs.850/- per month, is not proved on the record. Learned counsel further submits that there was a composite tenancy at the rate of Rs.700/- per month. Therefore, the petitioner cannot be made liable to pay Rs.850/- per month more for the open area. Be that as it may, this Court will not determine this issue at this stage and will leave the same to be decided by the Rent Controller, after the parties lead their evidence. The petitioner may deposit the amount of provisional rent, as assessed in the impugned order, with the condition that in case, lateron the Rent Controller comes to a conclusion Civil Revision No. 4586 of 2010 2 that there is a composite tenancy, the amount, so deposited, shall be adjusted towards the future rent. Learned counsel submits that the amount has already been deposited. If that be so, if a finding comes that it is one composite tenancy at the rate of Rs.700/- per month, needless to say, the amount, so deposited, shall be adjusted towards the future rent. With the observations made above, the present revision petition is disposed of. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge August 13, 2010 “DK”