Q¢PX0L 1N T CT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP. No. 10 $1 /200&—«(S.B.} ONE : p»'&e§kumar Dvivedi, 4 \ S/o Shri Shri Holuram Dvivedi, , . 'C aged about 39 years, R/o Gram— Tada Pipartarai, Kota, Bilaspur, (C.G.) ON f State of Chhattisgarh , 1 RESPDENTS . Through Secretary , Education Department , D.K.S. Bhawan D O?Y Raipur (C.G.) G 3m gqm 2. Director of public Instruction , CLERK ‘0 A' " Pensionbada Raipur (C. G.) K. » N UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE NSTITUTION OF INDIA HE HIGH OUR PETITIR < E- N / WRIT PETITIO COU @‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (5) No. 1082 of 200/ Pe’i'ifioner‘ : Deokumar‘ Dvivedi Versus Resjaondems S‘fa're of ChhaT?isgarh & anof’ner 5ingl¢ Bench: Hon'bie Mr. Jus‘l’ioe Sai‘ish K. Agniho‘fri. Mr. Kumaresh Tiwari, Advoca‘re for the peTi‘rioner. 5min Anju Ahuja, Depui’y Governmenf Advoca‘i'e for ‘i’he Sfa'i’a/responden?s. ORDER (Passed on fhis 26*“ Day 0f February, 2007) Léamad counsei appearing for “the §e+i+ianer submi'fs fhcrf The pe'i'i'i'io’r’tar is wwkin‘g as Assisi’ai‘ri' Teacher/Lec‘mrér. The pei'ifioner‘ abmined B. Ed. Examina‘fim cerfEfica'i’e ofl 09‘9—1993, on his own expenses. Learned counsel appearing. for fhe pe'fi’i’ionei‘ submi'i's 141a? fhe quesfiw involveii, herein asfo whe‘i’her 1’he Teacher, who obfaioed B. Ed. Examina‘fiori Cer‘fificafe on his ow‘n expenses is en'fi'l'ied i’o ‘iwo advance incremen'fs. Accordiiig is learned counsei for 'ihe pe'i‘i'rioner, i’he pe'fi‘fioner is eni‘i'fied +0 ’i'wo advance incremen‘i‘s in View of fhe decision of 1’nis Cour-r in one case of Vashwani' Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. hiunicioai Corpomfion, Dung and anofher {2006 (Ii) MPJR-CG 96}. This Cour? in +‘ne case of Vashwan‘r Kumar Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipal Corpora‘rion, burg and ano’i'her (5mm), came “l'o 'i'he conclusion ihai' ‘ihe Teacher‘s, who had obfained B. Ed. fQTI. Examinafi‘on Cer'fifica‘l'e on fheir own @ expenses, are cavered by The circuiar dafed 24.12.98 issued by The Sfa‘fe Governmen'i’ of Madhya Prudesh. Learned counsei far +‘ne pe‘i'i‘rioner farmer submi’l's "Hm? fhe facts and quesfion of {aw invalved in 1‘he presen‘f case are squarely €overed by decisiun of 'i'his Cour? in ‘fhe case of Vashwan‘i' Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Aauaicipal Carpamfion, Burg and ano'i'her (Supra), +0 which Izamed counsei appearing for The responden‘fs fairly concedes and agrees wifh The avermenf made by learned counsel appearing for fhe pefifioner. Accordingly, The wri'l' pefi‘i’ion is allowed in Terms of 'lhe order passed in fhe case of Yoshwarri' Kumor Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Carporafiori, burg and anofher (Supra), subjecf fo verifieafion of fhe fee? as To whefher The pefifioner has acquired B. Ed. Examina‘l'ion Cerfificafe on his own expenses as per fhe circulars da‘red 24.12.1998 6: 1.3.1999 and furfher whefher he has been paid Two advance increments or noi’. No order as 'l'o cosfs. r i Satish K.Agnihetri i Judge Sd/— Subhash