IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4298 of 2009 DURGA PRASAD SINHA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 18.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was suspended by an order dated 31.12.2008 in contemplation of a departmental proceedings. The writ petition was filed on 6.4.2009. A supplementary affidavit filed today suggests that charges have been issued on 27.7.2009. The submission is that charges not having been framed within three months and prior to the framing of charges, the petitioner has approached this Court after expiry of three months, the authorities are bound to revoke the suspension. Now that this issue stands decided by a Full Bench of this Court in 2009(4) PLJR 272. The writ application is disposed with directions to respondent no. 4 to pass final appropriate orders with regard to suspension of the petitioner under Rule 9(7), in light of the discussions of the Full Bench of this Court. This Court requires respondent no. 4 to pass a reasoned and speaking order disclosing transparency and application of mind on issues of distinction if he be of the opinion that notwithstanding the Full Bench decision, the order of suspension requires no interference. 2 Let such order be passed by him within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before him. The writ application stands disposed off. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)