IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 256 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 274 OF 2007 SMT. MARIA CONCEICAO DOURADO AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus ANTONIO MARCUS PACHECO AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Mr. A. F. Diniz, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. M. S. Sonak, Advocate for Respondent No. 4. Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 11th February, 2008 P.C.:- Heard. The learned Counsel for the Applicants states that the only interim relief which the Applicants are claiming is in the nature which was already granted during the pendency of the trial and that is in the nature of prayer (b). The Applicants do not press for prayer (a). After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, on perusal of the record it is seen that during the pendency of the suit in the trial Court the interim relief was granted for limited purpose whereby the Respondent No.4 who is now to be arrayed as Respondent No.3 consequent to the death of original Respondent No.3 was directed not to sell the double bedroom flat in question. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the same order shall continue during the pendency of the appeal and Respondent No.4 who is now arrayed as Respondent No.3 shall not sell the double bedroom flat in question without prior permission of this Court. Application disposed of. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.