IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 778 OF 2009 Dr.Seduramapandian s/o. Madasamy ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent --- Shri G.S. Hegade and Michal Anthony for Applicant Shri D.P. Adsule, APP for State ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 4TH MARCH, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant and the Learned APP for the State. 2. It is submitted that the Applicant is 50 years of age and was hospitalized due to coronary artery, diabetes and paralysis. It is submitted that he has been declared unfit for life long. 3. The production warrant has been issued by 19th Court Esplanade, Mumbai. It is submitted that since the Applicant is not in a position to come to Mumbai and since the anticipatory bail is not granted, the Applicant is on transit bail. 4. The Learned APP for the State states that the Investigating Officer is willing to travel to Tirunelveli where the Applicant at present is hospitalized. He, however, submits that the cost of traveling expenses and other expenses incurred by the Investigating Officer shall be borne by the Applicant and the Applicant shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer during his visit to Tirunelveli. 5. The Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant has no objection. 6. Under these circumstances, the production warrant is stayed till further orders. The Investigating Officer in the concerned case shall travel to Chennai and interrogate the Applicant. The travelling expenses and other expenses shall be borne by the Applicant. In view of this order, question of granting anticipatory bail to the Applicant does not arise at this stage. 7. Liberty is granted to both the parties to apply again, in the event any difficulty faced by the Investigating Officer. 8. The cost of Rs.7,500/- is quantified and the said amount be paid by the Applicant to the Investigating Officer before he leaves Mumbai. V.M. KANADE J.