IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. C.R.No.4214 of 2011 Date of decision: 2.8.2011 Bhim Sain Gupta and another .....Petitioners. Versus Satpal .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG. Present: Mr.Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate, with Mr.P.K.Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Mohnish Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. -- Rakesh Kumar Garg,J. (Oral) This is tenant's revision petition challenging the judgment of the Appellate Authority whereby his eviction from the demised premises was ordered on the ground of personal necessity. On 4.7.2011 when this Court was not agreeing with the arguments raised on behalf of the petitioner, counsel for the petitioner had submitted that petitioner be granted a reasonable time preferably two years to hand over the vacant possession of the shop in dispute to the respondent. On this limited point notice of motion was issued. Respondent has put in appearance through Shri Mohnish Sharma,Advocate, who has submitted that though there is no justification for granting time to the petitioner, however, any reasonable time which this Court deems proper be granted to the petitioner for handing over the vacant possession of demised premises to the respondent subject to the condition that the petitioner shall make the payment of arrears of rent, if any, within one month from today, and shall keep on paying the rent in advance by the 10th of every month in future and shall also furnish an undertaking before the Rent Controller C.R.No.4214 of 2011 2 within one month to hand over the vacant possession to the respondent on the expiry of such period, as aforesaid. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, this petition is dismissed with the observation that the petitioner is granted one year's time to vacate the demised premises and he shall hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent on or before 7th of August, 2012 and also that the petitioner shall make the payment of arrears of rent, if any, within one month from today, and shall keep on paying the rent in advance by the 10th of every month and shall also furnish an undertaking before the Rent Controller within one month, as aforesaid. In violation of any condition the eviction order shall come into force forthwith. It is also made clear that in case the petitioner fails to hand over the vacant possession to the respondent after the stipulated date i.e. 7th of August, 2012, the respondent shall be entitled to initiate contempt proceedings against the petitioner in addition to the execution proceedings. (Rakesh Kumar Garg) Judge August 2, 2011 rk