>lf HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH v^ CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL, J. Applicants v.~, Respondents M.C.C.No. 862 of 2011 1 Smt Laxmi Baghel, age 28 years, w/o late Liladhar Baghel 2 Ku Durga (Minor), age 6 years, d/o late Liladhar Baghel 3 Ku Neha (Minor), age 3 years, d/o late Liladhar Baghel 4 Smt Lila Bai Baghel, age 61 years, w/o late Palan Das (Minor appellant No.02 & 03 are represented by appellant No.01, mother in relation) All the above are r/o village - Ganjar, PO Ganjar, PS Bagbahra At present r/o Nayapara, Mahasamund, Distt Mahasamund (CG) VERSUS 1 Ramji Rai, age 39 years, driver, s/o Bacchan Rai, by Caste - Aahir, r/o village Kolkata, Baliyaghata, Babulgan, PS/PO Baliyaghata, distt Kolkata - 15 (WB) (Driver ofthe Truck No.WB-03/B 0524) 2 Pradeep Singh, age 44 years s/o Krishna Singh, r/o 44 - No, Masjid Bari gtreet, Distt Kolkata - 700006 (WB) (Owner ofthe Truck No.WB-03/B 0524) 3 The Oriental Insurance Com Ltd., through BM Manager, Katohhari Chowk, Raipur, Distt Raipur (CG) (Insurance Company of the Truck No.WB-03/B 0524) */^ MCCNo.862of2011 ApDlication for restoration of MAC No.260 of 2008 Present : Shri JA Lohani, counsel for the petitioners. ORDER >th (12InDecember,2011) The following. order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri JA Lohani, learned counsel for the petitioners is heard on the restoration petition. 2) The petitioners are seeking restoration of M.A.C. No.260 of 2008 which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide orderdated 17.10.2011. 3) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, we are satisfied that the absence of the petitioners' / appellants' counsel on 17.10.2011, when M.A.C. No. 260 of 2008 was taken up for hearing was based onbona fide grounds. 4) M.C.C. No. 862 of 2011, therefore, is allowed and M.A.C. No.260 of 2008 is restored to its original number. Sd/- Chief Jusdce nimmi Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge ^