C9 )w Qingy 'v‘ m. «4; gag; R: ‘ 1 Ci) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR ; CHHATTISGARH 3‘, w.P. No. 4%23 [2004 RESPONDENTS Bhagwat Prasad, S/o. Shri Latelram Aged about 39 years R/o. Near Water Tank, Tarbahar l ; Bilaspur, Tahsil and District ’_ Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS y State of Chhattisgarh ,r_ Through the Secretary School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 1 The Director-Cum—Commissioner Public Instruction School Education D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Joint Director Public Instruction School Education Bilaspur (C.G.) The District Education Officer Bilaspur (C.G.) The Principal Govt. Multipurpose Higher Secondary School, Bilaspur (C.G.) The Collector Bilaspur (C.G.) The Commissioner (Now abolish) i Bilaspur (C.G.) \j WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Xi—HC—78 Shri Gau‘l'am Khefmpa‘, Co .Insel for ‘H'Ie pefi‘rioner. Shri Sudhir Agmwal, Pan i Lawyer for fhe S‘m‘re/respondenfs 1 1'0 4 & 6 on'advance copy. Heard. The pe‘ri‘rioner' has filed 1' is wri1' pe‘ri'rion for quashing The order of Termina'rion, Annexur-e-P-1 dafed 13.5.2000. IT is submiffed by Iear-ne counsel for The pefi'rioner The? for The similar relief an original applic Tion No. 4604/2000 was filed by fhe peTi‘rioner before ‘l’he Sfa‘i'e A minis‘rm‘rive Tribunai and ‘rhe some was pending in i'rs Roipur Bench. He ur'l'her submifs ‘rha‘r re‘l'urn and rejoinder have been filed in The said origi l applicai'ion. Now since The fribunal has been abolished, The ma‘Her is n ‘r being 'raken up and fhe peTiTioner is in grea'r frouble. He further sqbmifs Thaf presen‘l‘ly, fhis pe‘ri‘l'ion be disposed of wi‘rh a direcfion 1’ call or Transfer The record from The Tribunal and To dispose of The aTTer as early as possible in accordance wiTh law. Learned-counsel for The eTiTioner submiTs ThaT since The STaTe AdminisTraTive Tribunal has be n abolished, There is no impedimenT in Transferring The maTTer To his CourT as The maTTers are To be Transferred in a rouTine manner. wmwe..bw W 200 L‘ mm (Wm WWW ammm Wmm mw1iwm %? aim 311%! 11.2.2005 XE-HC—78 WWW m 206 mm (Wm WWW W3”?! 1y WW wm $aimané¥1 ‘ .cuw‘lz. Learned counsel for 'l'He Sfafe does no? oppose ‘rhis iimi‘red prayer made by The learned counsel for Th a pe'ri‘rioner'. Accordingly, fhe prayer is aHPwed. Le‘l' 1+1e record of O.A.No. 4504/2000 be fransferred 1'0 This Cour‘r immediafely. Wi‘rh fhe aforesaid direcfiors, fhe petition sfands finally disposed.c€/ Consequently, M.W.P.No.509 6/2004 and I.A.No.9600/2004 stand \ disposed of. ’ Sd/- a! r 0 i Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge