IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3421 of 2010 1. LALITA KUMARI W/O ASHOK KUMAR R/O VILL. AND P.O.- BICHHAWE, P.S.- CHANANPUR MANANPUR, DISTT.- LAKHISARAI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR, INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, (ICDS), SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, LAKHISARAI 4. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, LAKHISARAI 5. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, LAKHISARAI 6. THE CHAIRMAN, JILA PARISHAD, LAKHISARAI 7. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, LAKHISARAI 8. CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, CHANAN BLOCK, DISTT.- LAKHISARAI 9. MUKHIYA, MAHESHLETA GRAM PANCHAYAT, LAKHISARAI 10. THE UP-MUKHIYA, MAHESHLETA GRAM PANCHAYAT, LAKHISARAI 11. ANITA KUMARI W/O SRI BALESHWAR DAS R/O VILL.- BICHHWE, P.S. CHANAN (MANPUR), DISTT.- LAKHISARAI ----------- 2. 13.9.2010 The petitioner was selected as Anganwari Sahayika. Respondent no. 11, selected as Anganwari Sevika questioned it before the District Magistrate. The District Magistrate set aside both appointments on the ground that the mapping register identifying the dominant caste i.e., Scheduled Caste or Backward Caste had not been done properly. The appeal of the petitioner before the Commissioner has been rejected. The petitioner has been unable to demonstrate any perversity in the findings of the District Magistrate. Identification of the dominant caste is an executive function based on the compilation of facts and 2 figures which the Court cannot reassess. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the application at this stage to collect facts and figures and if so advised move afresh. There is no occasion for the Court to make any observation with regard to the same at this stage. Fresh facts obviously may require fresh consideration in accordance with law. The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)