IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.438 of 2003 (O&M) Date of decision:20.09.2010 National Insurance Company Limited ....Appellant versus Mithu Ram alias Bittu Ram and others ...Respondents II. FAO No.726 of 2005 (O&M) M/s Delite Bread Bakers Private Limited ....Appellant versus Mithu Ram alias Bittu Ram and others ...Respondents Present: Mr. V. Ramswaroop, Advocate, for the appellant in FAO No.438 of 2003 and for respondent No.3 in FAO No.726 of 2005. None for the appellant in FAO No.438 of 2003. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? ---- K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. The Insurance Company is in appeal against a direction for recovery against the insured on its finding that the driving licence was not genuine and provided for satisfaction of the award only for the third party claimant. I cannot find any error in the approach of the Tribunal to subject this for any modification in the appeal. The owner has come on an independent appeal in FAO No.726 of 2005. He is not before this Court to press for even the relief that the right of recovery ought not to FAO No.438 of 2003 (O&M) - 2 - have been granted to the Insurance Company. The award of the Tribunal is confirmed and the appeal by the Insurance Company is dismissed finding that it will have a right of recovery against the insured and the appeal by the insured is dismissed for non-prosecution. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 20.09.2010 sanjeev