REVN.464-10 - 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 464 OF 2010 M/s. Status Enterprises & Anr. ...Applicants Vs. Kailasrao Sakharam Kodre & Anr. ...Respondents *** Mr. Amol Dongre a/w Manju Sharma, Kevi Rubens K. Akhtar, i/b Vigil Juris, for the Applicants. Mr. P. A. Pol, APP for the Respondent-State. *** CORAM: V. M. KANADE J. DATE : OCTOBER 21, 2010 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants. The applicants are challenging the order of issuance of process passed by the J.M.F.C. Cantonment Court, Pune, on a complaint filed by respondent No.1 under S. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, inter alia on the ground that the Pune Court has no jurisdiction to try and decide the complaint since the entire cause of action has arisen in Mumbai. It is an admitted position that in the present case the plea has REVN.464-10 - 2 - already been recorded and affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief has been filed and cross-examination of the complainant has begun. It is well settled position in law that once the trial begins, the High Court is not expected to interfere with the order of issuance of process in view of various judgments of Apex Court and this Court, wherein it has been held that in the summons case or a summary trial once plea is recorded, the trial ends only with the judgment in that case of acquittal or conviction. This being the position, it will not be possible to consider the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicants, on the question of territorial jurisdiction of the Court to entertain the complaint. Hence, the criminal revision application is dismissed. The trial is expedited. 2. Needless to mention that the applicant may agitate the points raised in this revision at the time of trial. [ V. M. KANADE J.]