HIGH COURTOFCHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR SjnQSe BeDch : Hon'bieShri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. M.A. (C.)No.1316/2007 Appeiiarsf Rajesh Kumar, Aged 22 years, Son of Ciaimant Jilani Sahu,By Profession-Student B.A. Finai, Resident of Pousara, Tahsil Basna, Districf Mahasamund (C.G.) Versus 1. Sunii Kumar SJngh,IAged 35tyear%, S/o Bhagv</an Singh, Resident of SaraipalJ, P.S. & Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund(C.G.)i (Driver of Jeep No.C.G./06/ZW2003) 2. Kdushal Kumar Chandrakar, Aged- Years S/o Harakhram Chandrakar, Resident of Ward No.03, Imlibhata, Mahasamund, Tahsii & District Mahasamund (C.G.) (Owner of Jeep No^.G./06^V2003) Resoondents Memo oflVliscellaneous Appeai under Section 173 ofthe IVIotorVehicles Act. Present : - Shri J. A. Lohahi, counsel for the appellant. Shri Sunit Sahu, counsel for respondents^ Tumanei ORALORDER (Passed on this 19th day of August, 2008) Heard on admission: (2) The appellant/clajmant is aggrieved by an award dated 29-11-2006 passed by the 1st Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribynai, Mahasamund (henceforth "the Tribunal")in Claim Case No.25^006 ;whereby compensation of Rs.17,000/" was awarded in a injury case. (3) Learned counsei for the appellant did not dispute that no medical evidence was ied by the claimant before the Tribunal to substantiate the fact that the claimant had suffered grievous injur/ due to the accident. It was also not disputed that no disability certificate was produced by the ciaimant before the Tribunal,: in this view bf the matter, no ground for enhancement of compensation is made out during arguments. (4) inthe resutt, the appeal being devoid of merit isdismissed atthe stage of -admission. in this view pf the matter, learned counse! fbr respondents does not press l:A.No.2, cross appeal under Order 41 Rute 22 of C.P:C. which is .accordingjy dismiss^as not pressed. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh :-^ ..-• • : ' ' •[ • ' • Judge