IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 27TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 5TH ASWINA 1933 RP.No. 687 of 2011() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.8917/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/3RD RESPONDENT IN WPC. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DAVID ANTO,PALLIPATTU HOUSE, M.G ROAD,CHALAKKUDY,THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 001. BY ADVS. SRI.P.V.BABY SRI.A.N.SANTHOSH RESPONDENTS/PETITIOER AND RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEVASSY AGED 75 YEARS,S/O.ANTONY KALLINGAL VEEDU,MUNICIPAL QUARTERS ROAD, CHALAKUDY THRISSUR. 2. CHALAKUDY MUNICIPALITY, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY PIN 680 307. 3. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,CHALAKUDY MUNICIPALITY,REP.BY ITS CHAIRPERSON, PIN 680 307. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH PODUVAL THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: VK C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ---------------------------- R.P.No.687 of 2011 in W.P.(C)No.8917 of 2011 ---------------------------- Dated 27th September, 2011 ORDER The third respondent in W.P.(C)No.8917 of 2011 is the review petitioner. As per the judgment dated 29.3.2011 this Court directed the second respondent therein to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1 appeal, in accordance with law, within the time stipulated thereunder. It is the said judgment that is sought to be reviewed by the review petitioner. I have gone through grounds (A) to (D) in the review petition. The petitioner did not bring out the error that is apparent on the face of record inviting invocation of the review jurisdiction. In fact, while disposing of the writ petition this Court has not made any observation with respect to the merits of the contentions. Therefore, it will be open to the review petitioner, the third respondent in the writ petition, to raise all his contentions when Ext.P1 appeal referred to thereunder is taken up for consideration by the second respondent. In the said circumstances, I find no merit in this review petition and accordingly, it is dismissed with the above observation. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS