IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34769 of 2010 SATYENDRA KUMAR, SON OF RADHE SHYAM PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-TAKIYA, POLICE STATION-SASARAM(M), DISTRICT-ROHTAS AT SASARAM………………………………………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR……………….OPPOSITE PARTY. ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vivekanand Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Hirday Prasad Singh, A.P.P. --------- 2. 5.10.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that neither he is named in the First Information Report nor has he been put on any T.I. Parade. Petitioner is businessman and it has been alleged that the looted mobile phone was recovered from the shop of the petitioner. It is also submitted that the co-accused, Santosh Khatik, has allegedly stated in his confessional statement that he had kept the alleged mobile phone with the petitioner as - 2 - security. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Satyendra Kumar, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No.276 of 2010, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Sanjay-II (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)