1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5653 OF 2009 1. Sau. Chetna Sanjay Phalak } Age : 30 Years, Occ. Household, } R/o : Bhusawal, Tq. Bhusawal, } Dist. Jalgaon. } 2. Shri. Sanjay Prithviraj Phalak } Age : 41 Years, Occ. Business, } R/o : Bhusawal, Tq. Bhusawal, } Dist. Jalgaon. } 3. Sau. Sharda W/o Nilkanth Patil } Age : 32 Years, Occ. Household. } R/o : Bhusawal, Tq. Bhusawal, } Dist. Jalgaon. } 4. Shri. Anil S/o Pandurang Mahajan } Age : 44 Years, Occ. Business, } R/o : Bhusawal, Tq. Bhusawal, } Dist. Jalgaon. } 5. Vijay S/o Manohar Phalak } Age : 34 Years, Occ. Agriculture, } R/o :Bhusawal, Tq. Bhusawal, } Dist. Jalgaon. } .... PETITIONERS V E R S U S 1. The State of Maharashtra } Through the Secretary for } Co-operation, Mantralaya } Mumbai. } 2 2. The State Minister for Co-operation } State of Maharashtra } Mantralaya, Mumbai. } 3. The Additional Commissioner for } Co-operation and Registrar } Co-operative Societies, } Maharashtra State, Pune. } 4. Shri. N.D.Kare } Administrator and Assistant } Registrar, Co-operative Societies, } Erandol, Tq. Erandol, } Dist. Jalgaon. } .... RESPONDENTS Mr. V.D.Hon, Advocate for Petitioners. Smt. S.D.Shelke, A.G.P. for State. CORAM : B.R.GAVAI, J. DATE OF JUDGMENT : 24/11/2009 ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent. 2. By way of present Writ Petition, the petitioners challenge the Order dated 25/8/2009, vide which the application filed by the present petitioners for stay to the order passed by the respondent no. 3 dated 7/8/2009, came to be rejected. 3 3. Though Mr. Hon, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners has addressed the Court on merits of the matter, I am not inclined to consider the same, since I find that the petition arises out of purely an interlocutory order. 4. In that view of the matter, present Writ Petition is disposed of by quashing and setting aside the order dated 25/8/2009 and directing that the effect and operation of the order dated 7/8/2009 passed by the respondent no. 3 shall stand stayed till disposal of the Appeal by the respondent no. 2. 5. It is further made clear that in case if any order is passed by the respondent no. 2 adverse to the interest of the petitioners, the same shall not given effect to for the period of 15 days from the passing of such order. [ B.R.GAVAI ] JUDGE knp/WP5653.09