WP(C) 3745/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. M. Bhagabati, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner. None appears for the Mangaldoi College Authorities. Mr. U.K. Goswami, learned standin g counsel for the Education Department represents respondents 1 & 2. The petitioner claims that he joined as a bearer in Mangaldoi College as per appointment order issued by the Principal on 30.11.81 and since the date of his joining on 10.12.1981, the petitioner is serving on a consolidated pay in a non-sanctioned post. Later when a regular Grade-IV vacancy occurred in the college due to dea th of one Monowar Ali, a bearer working in the Physics department, the petitione r by virtue of his more than 26 years of service expected the college to take st eps to regularize his service in the said vacancy. Instead the college resolved on 15.7.07 to consider appointment of the deceased’s son Md. Mafidul Islam on co mpassionate ground in the said vacancy, caused due to death of Late Monowar Ali. In the affidavit-in-opposition filed by the Principal of the College on 7.9.07, it is averred that staff working in the non-sanctioned post in the colle ge are to be regularized on the basis of their seniority and all other Grade-IV staffs senior to the petitioner have already been regularized. It is further ave rred that because of the ban imposed by Government Memorandum dated 12.10.04, no regularization of any staff could be made by the college after the date of the said Memorandum. It is also averred that the college authorities have not taken a ny decision to appoint Md. Mafidul Islam on compassionate basis and only a resol ution in this regard has been taken by the Governing body on 15.7.07. Mr. M. Bhagabati, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has produ ced an order passed by the Court on 30.6.09 in W.P(C) No. 2537/09, which case wa s filed by Md. Mafidul Islam claiming appointment on compassionate basis in the vacancy of his father Lt. Monowar Ali in the Mangaldoi college. The said writ pe tition has been disposed of by this Court on 30.6.09, directing consideration of the case of Md. Mafidul Islam in terms of the direction given by this Court in the Case of Achyut Ranjan Das vs. State of Assam reported in 2006(4) GLT 674. Having regard to the above, I feel that this case can be disposed of by directing the college authorities to take requisite steps for regularizing the s ervice of the petitioner, in a regular Grade-IV vacancy as per the norms in forc e, since the petitioner has been working in the college in a non-sanctioned post for last 28 years. This would be done provided there are no impediment in law, in making such regularization. The appropriate exercise be initiated in this reg ard expeditiously without any undue delay. A copy of the order dated 30.6.09 passed in W.P.(C) No. 2537/09 is kept in the records of this case. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly.