IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.534 of 2009 REKHA KUMARI, W/o Shio Kumar, D/o Sri Sidheshwar Yadav, resident of Village – Uttari Mandri, PS Budha Colony, Distt. Patna ….. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Aayush Kumar @ Rajat Kumar minor elder son of Rekha Kumari and Shio Kumar resides in detention of Sri Shio Kumar (husband of the petitioner) 3. Shio Kumar S/o Satyanarayan Rai R/o Vigrahapur, PS Jakkanpur, Distt. Patna (husband of petitioner) 4. Satyanarayan Rai S/o Late Ramchandra Pahalwan (father – in-law of petitioner) 5. Mithilesh Kr. S/o Sri Satyanarayan Rai (Bhasur of petitioner) 6. Smt. Sheela Devi W/o Sri Satyanarayan Rai (mother-in-law of petitioner) 7. Ranjit Kumar S/o Sri Satyanaran Rai (Bhasur of petitioner) - All residents of Mohalla Vigrahapur, PS Jakkanpur, Distt. Patna 8. Smt. Indu Devi W/o Shailendra Kumar R/o Sardalichak, PS & Distt. Patna (Nanad of petitioner) 9. Smt. Asha Devi W/o Sri Sunil Kumar R/o Mohalla Saristabad, PS Jakkanpur, Distt. Patna (Nanad of petitioner) 10. Smt. Babita Devi W/o Sri Gajendra Kumar R/o Mohalla Punaichak, PS Shastrinagar, Distt. Patna (Nanad of petitioner) 11. District Magistrate, Patna 12. Superintendent of Police, Patna 13. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Patna 14. Officer-in-charge, Police Station, Jakkanpur, Distt. Patna …… Respondents ----------- 05- 12.5.2010 Heard Mr. Pancham Lal Jaiswal for the petitioner, Mr. Kaushal Kumar Jha, learned Standing Counsel no.18, and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy for respondent nos. 2 to 10. In compliance of the order dated 9.11.2009, the petitioner, her parents, respondent no.3 (the husband of the petitioner), and the parents of respondent no.3 are present. We have interviewed the petitioner and respondent no.3 separately in camera, as well as the parents of both sides. The petitioner and respondent no.3 state that she is very happy in her matrimonial home and are 2 enjoying matrimonial bliss. They submit in one voice that their two sons are with them, and their problems have come to an end. In that view of the matter, she returns to her matrimonial home along with her husband. 2. In view of the position that the petitioner and respondent no.3 are happily living together in her matrimonial home, they have no intention of pursuing the litigations in the present context which are pending in various courts, and are indicated hereinbelow:- (a) Matrimonial Case no.483 of 2006 (Shio Kumar v. Rekha Kumari) pending in the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna. (b) Complaint Case no.3778(C) of 2006 Under Section 498A, Cr.PC, pending in the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna. © Guardianship Case no.22 of 2007, pending before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna. (d) Case No.182(M) of 2006, under Section 125, Cr.P.C.,pending before the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna. 3. In view of the happy conclusion of the present proceeding, and in exercise of our discretionary prerogative writ jurisdiction, we terminate the aforesaid litigations. 3 4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. ( S K Katriar ) ( Kishore K Mandal ) mrl