IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO : 18157 of 2001 Between: K.Krishna Moorthy, S/o K.V.Raghavendra Rao, R/o IV-305/27 T.G.K.Nagar, Adoni, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner and Registrar of Cooperative Societies Government of A.P. Hyderabad. 2 The District Cooperative Officer, Kurnool District. 3 Sri Mahayogi Lakshamamma Coop. Bank Ltd., Rep. by its Chairman/Persons-in-Charge, Adoni, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, order or direction more particulrly one in the nature of Writ of Mandakus declaring the impugned action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not taking any acion for implementation of the provisions of A.P.C.S.Act even though the affairs of the 3rd Respondent bank are being conducted contrary to the provisions of A.P.C.S.Act, and thereby allowing the 3rd Respondent to conduct the affairs of the bank without any audit inspection etc., as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art.14 of the Constitution of India and conseuently direct the respondents 1 and 2 in enquire into the affairs of the 3rd Respondent bank and take appropriate action upon the irregular administration of the 3rd Respondent and also for conducting elections to the vancies of Directors by appointing Election Officer and following election procedure Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO. 18157 OF 2001 ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks an omnibus direction seeking an enquiry against the 3rd respondent Co-operative Bank on the ground that the persons in management are not properly managing the affairs of the 3rd respondent. The petitioner himself claimed that he is an ordinary member of the Bank. This writ petition was filed in the year 2001 primarily seeking stay of General Body Meeting for holding elections, which were scheduled on 31-8-2001. The said notice of election was sought to be stayed by this Court. However, while admitting the writ petition this Court had declined to grant any stay. Now eight years have been elapsed and the cause of action in the writ petition does not survive. The grievance of the petitioner, if any against the management of the 3rd respondent as alleged in the writ petition is for petitioner to agitate as a member in the General Body Meetings and cannot seek intervention of the official respondents through process of this Court. Writ petition is misconceived and it is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________________ Justice Vilas V.Afzulpurkar 16th December, 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO. 18157 OF 2001 16th December, 2008.