THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.28227 of 2010 Date: 14.12.2010 Between: P. Jayaram Naidu and others ..... Petitioners AND The Tahsildar, Chittoor .....Respondent Counsel for the Petitioners: None appeared Counsel for Respondent: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “..to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent herein in issuing the impugned proceedings RocNo.C/245/2010 dated 31.07.2010 for collection of arrears for different years under Revenue Recovery Act as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, being violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also in violation of principles of natural justice and quash the same and consequently to stay lal further proceedings in pursuance of impugned proceedings of the respondent vide Roc.No.C/245/2010 dated 31.07.2010 pertaining to all the petitioners and pass such other order…” When this writ petition came up for admission on 12.11.2010, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought for an adjournment for filing a better affidavit. Today, at the hearing, neither the learned counsel for the petitioners is present nor better affidavit has been filed. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing their cause in the writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.35993 of 2010 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 14th December, 2010 GHN