IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 15TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 26TH MAGHA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3587 of 2009() ------------------------------ CRA.102/2009 of ADDL. SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC), THODUPUZHA ST.78/2008 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-II, THODUPUZHA .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT ------------------------------------------------------------ LEELAMMA.K.M, NURSING ASSISTANT, PHC, KUMARAMANGALAM.P.O, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.ANIL K.MOHAMMED RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------------------------------------- 1. SHIJU MARKOSE, KALLOLICKAL HOUSE, ARIKUZHA.P.O, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKY DISTRICT. 2. STATE, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.SABU JACOB FOR R1 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.P.A.SALIM THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P. No.3587 of 2009 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 15.02.2010 ORDER The accused in S.T.No.78 of 2008 on the file of the J.F.C.M- II, Thodupuzha for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against her concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.No.1531 of 2010 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsel. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. Money, if any, deposited by the revision petitioner before the trial court pursuant to the orders, if any, passed by the superior courts shall be refunded to the revision petitioner/accused. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. Dated this the 15th day of February, 2009. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. sj