AMENDED PBTITION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS ^ W.P. No.4341/ 2005 1) M/s R. K. Traders, Sadar Bazar, Gavali Para, Durg, Distt. Durg (CG) Through its Proprietor Rajendra Kumar Jain, Sadar Bazar Gavali Para, Durg. RESPONDENT 2) Rajesh Kumar Jain, S/o Tarachand Jain, Aged about 34 years, Both resident of Sadar Bazar, Gavali Para, Durg, Distt. Durg (CG). Versus 1) Ambuja Cement Eastern Limited, Ravan, Tahsil Baloda Bazar, Previously known as Modi Cement Ltd. A Company registered under the Companies Act; having its Registered Office at Ravan, Tahsil Baloda Bazar, District-Raipur(CG). 2) The Collector, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG). •i WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 *1WW{ sh^lch 3^' '^•Ni<vi<4, y>Tn'yli<o, fs|dl^l^< ^-^..^:.^^L|. ^ 200,<>' 3ii^i4^ch (^cii^d^igT) ^TT^T^Tf^T c^TT3T[^T9h^[ch 'u. ^' ^ ^TTW^rfN'CT^T 24.01.2007 Shri P.Diwakar, Sr. Couns< the petitioner. Heard. The instant petition is 06.0S.200S of AnneKure P-8 psf Judge, Raipur whereby the appli^ Order 18 Rule 1 of fche CFC was| onus of proving the controversy defendant and therefore he has The above findisig is basedj hiB counter claim where he has tb in the.plaint and has ftirther se) t<1^ 3,64^025/- fer^ adju^tmg the amojunt I have heard counsei for tll In view of the above ment the opinion that fchere is &o j'j Court foelow which calls for int|< Coiistitistiosi of Is&dia. IB the the admissio^: stage itseif. 1m. view of the above, 3S30/200S sfcand disposed of^ ^l^td^-l ^ll^dT^-T^ <Rf^K ^3Tf^T3n^T 1 with Shri P.R. Patankar counsel for directed agaiast the order dated ^.ssed by Second Additional District ^ation preferred by tfae plaintiif usider allowed asm it was held that primasy |n^'olved isi the dtepute reste upon the begin evidence. osx the pleadings of the defendaiite in ladmitted the transactioxis referred to up a counter claim for a sum of Rs. claisned in the piaint. ^e pefcitioner. doned admitted facts this Court is of irisdicfcionai error committed by the lerference iiader Articie 227 of the |resiiit the petitiosi is dtsmissed at I.A. No. 8127/2005 aad E.A. No. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge P.T.O.