1 conpw6-10.sxw pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Contempt Petition No. 6 of 2010 in Writ Petition No.1198 of 2009 Airport Authority of India .. Petitioners v/s. State of Maharashtra & Others ..Respondents Mr.Girish Kulkarni i/b. The Law Point for the Petitioners Mr.J.S.Saluja AGP for the State Ms.S.S.Pakale with Ms.T.H.Puranik for the BMC Mr.M.P.Vashi for the Applicant in Chamber Summons No.369 of 2010 CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 4th February, 2011 P.C. : 1. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners states that pursuant to the Order passed by this Honourable Court on 22.12.2010, the Corporation has addressed a letter to the petitioners dated 30.12.2010. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners are 2 conpw6-10.sxw aggrieved by the contents of the said letter. 3. This contempt petition was filed as the Corporation had not looked into the representation and decided the same. Now that the representation has been decided, this Court need not go into this contempt petition. If at all the petitioners are aggrieved by the decision taken by the Corporation in terms of letter dated 30.12.2010, they are at liberty to take appropriate steps as adopting appropriate proceedings. This petition need not be taken ahead and it is disposed of with no order as to costs. 4. If the petitioners are aggrieved by the Corporation’s letter, they are at liberty to take steps to protect their interest. 5. In view of the above, Chamber Summons No.369 of 2010 in Contempt Petition No.6 of 2010 in Writ Petition No.1198 of 2010 does not survive and is allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]