HON’BLE SHRI G.S.SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE WRIT PETITION No.16875 of 1995 Between: U.Ramulu …Petitioner AND The Senior Divisional Manager, LIC, Divisional Office, S.D.Road, Secunderabad and another Respondents ORDER Counsel for petitioner : None Counsel for respondents : Shri M.V.Suresh 24-10-2006 In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for issue of a mandamus to the respondents to regularise his services and pay him consequential monetary benefits. Since no one has appeared for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed in default. I may also mention that even if the learned counsel for the petitioner had appeared and argued the case, the writ petition would have been dismissed because; i) the petitioner has not impleaded the employer namely Life Insurance Corporation of India as party respondent to the writ petition, and ii) in view of the judgment of the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Secretary, State of Karnataka and others Vs. Uma Devi and others[1], this Court cannot issue direction for regularisation of services of an employee, who had worked as daily wager with intermittent breaks. For the aforestated reasons, the writ petition is dismissed. G.S.SINGHVI, CJ 24-10-2006 bsc [1] (2006) 4 SCC 1