IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 29TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 4075 of 2011() ------------------------------------ CC.411/2010 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-V, KOZHIKODE. CRIME NO.45/2010 OF MARAD POLICE STATION. .................... PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. K.P. SHAMEER ALI, S/O.ABOOBACKER, K.P. HOUSE, VELLANCHERY PADAM, MARAD VAYANASALA, BEYPORE AMSOM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. A.P. HAMSAKKOYA, S/O.ABOOBACKER, K.P. HOUSE, VELLANCHERY PADAM, MARAD VAYANASALA, BEYPORE AMSOM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. SULFIKKER K.P., S/O.ABOOBACKER, K.P. HOUSE, VELLANCHERY PADAM, MARAD VAYANASALA, BEYPORE AMSOM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-31. 2. V.P. SAIRABANU, D/O.V.P. ABDULLAKKOYA, V.P. HOUSE, SAGARASARANI, P.O. MARAD, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-675 051. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.RAJESH VIJAYAN. R2 BY ADV. SRI.S.SHAJI. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs Crl.MC.No. 4075 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:- ANNEXURE A1: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE JFCM COURT V, KOZHIKODE DATED 17-2-2010. ANNEXURE A2: TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.45/10 OF MARAD POLICE STATION DATED 22-2-2010. ANNEXURE A3: TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE IN CRIME NO.45/10 OF MARAD POLICE STATION DATED 13-3-2010. ANNEXURE A4: TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE 1ST PETITIONER AND THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 12-11-2011. ANNEXURE A5: TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 18-11-11. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs N.K. BALAKRISHNAN,J. ------------------------------------ Crl.M.C.No. 4075 of 2011 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 29th day of November, 2011 ORDER Petitioners are the accused in CC.411/10 of JFCM – V, Kozhikode. The offences alleged against them are under Sections 406 and 498A r/w 34 IPC. The second respondent who is the de facto complainant is represented in this court by her counsel. It is submitted by both sides that the parties have settled the matter out of court and an agreement was entered into between them. Affidavit has been filed before the court to that effect. The dispute is purely personal in nature. In the light of the settlement arrived at, this petition allowed. Further proceedings in CC.411/10 of JFCM – V, Kozhikode is quashed. N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE smvd