IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2011 / 15TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 38191 of 2010(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.K.SHYAM, TRADE INSTRUCTOR, S.N.POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM, RESIDING AT KOZHITHODU VEEDU, PANDHRANDUMURI NAGAR, THATTAMALA P.O., KOLLAM-20. BY ADV. SRI.S.SUDHEESHKAR SRI. K.SIJU SRI.PRATHEESH.P SRI.A.MUHAMMED RAFI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CHAIRMAN, GOVERNING BODY, S.N.POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM. 2. THE PRINCIPAL, S.N.POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM. 3. SRI.AJITH V., H.O.S., MECHANICAL DEPARTMENT, S.N.POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM. 4. THE SENIOR JOINT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, PADMAVILASAM ROAD FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE SHRI A.N.RAJAN BABU FOR R1 AND R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.38191/2010-Y ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 5th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is working as a Trade Instructor in second respondent's Polytechnic. Mainly it is pointed out that the petitioner is not getting salary from March 2010 onwards. The petitioner on enquiry was informed that his casual leave was not sanctioned for 03/03/2010 A.N and 04/03/2010. It is further pointed out by the petitioner that the third respondent has taken certain objections due to extraneous reasons against the petitioner which has resulted in the present predicament. Aggrieved by the denial of salary, the petitioner has approached the fourth respondent by filing Ext.P7 representation. 2. There will be a direction to the fourth respondent to take a decision on Ext.P7 representation after notice to the petitioner and respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this Judgment. The petitioner W.P.(C). No.38191/2010 -:2:- will produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of the Judgment before the fourth respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE