IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8707 of 2010 GHUTAR YADAV S/o Bishuni Yadav resident of village Firoji P.S. Kako Dist. Jahanabad Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR Opp. Party ----------- 03/ 25.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 22.2.2009 in a case registered under sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that 5/6 criminals took away about Rs1900/- and one wrist watch from the possession of the informant and his friends. Petitioner was subsequently apprehended and from his possession a loaded pistol and wrist watch was recovered. On the basis of which two separate cases were registered: One under section 414 IPC and other under the Arms Act. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been granted bail in cases under section 414 IPC and under the Arms Act. Moreover, petitioner has not been put on T.I. Parade till date. Learned counsel for the State submits that recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner. In view of the fact that wrist watch has not been put on T.I. Parade nor any cash has been recovered and considering the period in custody, let the petitioner be released on bail in connection with Kako P.S. Case no. 18 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000-/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Jehanabad. - 2 - It is made clear that if the petitioner will fail to appear on three consecutive dates in either of three cases, then respective trial courts will be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. shahid (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J))