-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10308 OF 2010 Walmik Damu Nandan ...Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents Mr. Shaikh Nasir Mashih for the petitioner. Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP, for the State. Mr. Anilkumar Patil for respondent Nos. 5 and 6. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & A.A. SAYED , JJ. DATE: JANUARY 13, 2011. P.C. This petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the order of suspension dated 20th October, 2010. It is submitted that during the pendency of this petition, the enquiry against the petitioner has been concluded and the petitioner is removed from the services. In view of this, the prayer regarding suspension has become infructuous. 2. Regarding other prayer for holding enquiry against the management is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would like to file appeal against the order of termination. So far as the grievance of the petitioner regarding allegation against the illegality of management is concerned, it will be open to the petitioner to file fresh petition in case the -2- appeal preferred by the petitioner is allowed against the removal order. In view of this, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw this petition. Permission granted. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. It will be open to the petitioner to request the appellate authority to expedite his appeal. It is for the appellate authority to consider his request. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. A.A. SAYED, J.