1 CRI.APL. NO.6/2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 6. CRI.APPLN/6/2011 BALU EKNATH KEDAR V/S THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. A.N.Nagargoje, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. V.H.Dighe, APP for State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 27.1.2011 1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant. In a case of Bank heist, the accused/applicant who is in custody, seeks release on bail. 2. Learned Counsel submits, seizure of the motor cycle from the accused/applicant has no connectivity with the vehicle used in commission of the offense as the vehicle No.MH-17-AB 1261 has been taken charge from other accused. 3. The investigation at this stage illustrates, there was concert between the accused/applicant with principal accused. The accused coordinated movements of the persons 2 CRI.APL. NO.6/2011 occupying Indica Car carrying Bank money to the extent of Rs. 55,00,000/- ( Rs. Fifty five lacs). Recovery from other accused by itself will not absolve, at this stage, the present accused/applicant his connectivity at the material time which is established from mobile user and its traces. 3. No case to release the accused applicant on bail. The observations are prima facie in nature. Application rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/6-11crapl