IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2009 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 9796 of 2009(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ S.MOHANAN, PUTHENVILAYIL HOUSE, PERINJAMKUTTY P.O, CHEMPAKAPARA, IDUKKI DT. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SARIN SRI.M.R.SASITH SRI.K.K.SUNIL KUMAR (IDUKKI) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, IDUKKI. 2. TAHSILDAR, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, NEDUMKANDOM. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VATHIKUDY, MURIKASSERY. 4. THE SECRETARY, VATHIKUDY GRAMA PANCHAYAT, MURIKASSERY. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 9796 OF 2009 (T) ===================== Dated this the 26th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner claims to have filed Ext.P2 before the 2nd respondent complaining of illegal removal of sand from the various kadavus of Chinnar river. It is stated that orders have not been passed on the application and therefore the writ petition is filed. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, the said application has been received, necessarily, the 2nd respondent shall take action thereon. 3. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that if Ext.P2 has been received and is pending, the 2nd respondent shall consider the same. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, on production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp