IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.8107 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 14.12.2010 Baaz Singh and another ....Petitioners Versus Uttar Singh ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Padam Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Appellate Court under the provisions of Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. By virtue of the impugned order, the parties have been directed to maintain status quo. A perusal of the impugned order shows that the parties, who are litigating, have shown some material to the Court which prima facie cannot be brushed aside or accepted to state affirmatively that the possession on the suit property is of either of the parties. In such an eventuality, the discretion has been wisely exercised by the Appellate Court in ordering the maintenance of status quo. There is thus no legal infirmity in the impugned order, neither is there any error of jurisdiction shown which would warrant C.R.No.8107 of 2010 (O&M) -2- interference by this Court in revisional jurisdiction. Dismissed. 14.12.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss