J^^v^:.-v^^(^~^As^ii^feSiAjat^^"t*i?<^F^ ytif^r-^^VV^/-^~^\/^ zisr 'me HIGH COURT or ?4iy3HyA ERADESH_ Aa'^J&BAuPUR 3(9£-To£ 1996 Co—operativ&-Printing'Press Ltd«, a society registeresa under the -Drovisions of M.P. Coopera-tivf Societies &s.fe,^_la6ll.,—*hEe.ugbits: Manager Shri Sanjay Jain. '• PETIT10NER 1. En-ployees Stat.e Insiu-ance Corpora'fcios^ •through tha Regional Director? Indorea RESPOI'aSEl-'lTS 2« The Depu-fcy Regiona State Xnsurance Bhawan, Nanda N1 Director 3 a Recovery Officer, office of Eraployee. ' Sta-te Ins'urance Corporation, Indor-e. Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank t Rajnandgaoiit through its Branch Agriculture Branch.. Rajnandgaon PSTITION UNDER ARTICLBS 226 & 227, COKSTI'rUriON O'E INDIA. B:] . W^B- :< .••^ii..^ p: '"?;.' '?a-HG—7S ^ST ^i<ftw<i, swwi'c, P^wvy. ..US........ZMS 'i ^, °f^nz^ .-];'<'?; ci:i'w! SB : HON'BLB 8HRI JUSTICE PfUTINKER DIWAKBR 28.07.2009 Shri Parag Kotecha, couns( Shri S.P.Kale, counsel Shri Yashwant Singh Thal^ur for i^espondent avatlable Counsel for the petitioner liberty to avail the remedy submits that if at this stage he w| his case may be tiine barred and| the said authority for deciding thj Leamed oounsel for the direction is issued. Accordingly, the petitionf petition with the aforesaid liberttr. and application for condonati^n considered by the appellate auth{ in view the fact that the writ p[ pending. «bl<lf<'(<fl-)'WR!?'? 'fe^ tfilt^K ^- Q) bl for the petitioner. No.l. iur, Dy.A.G. for the State. wants to withdraw this petition with to the petitioner. He further ill approach the appellate authority, therefore direction naay be issued to ^ case of the petitioner on merits. [State has no objection if tha said er is pennitted to withdraw the r. In the eventuality of filing appeal of delay, the same would be brity in accordance with law kegping fctition was filed and the same was Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker iaffi