iM IN THE HIGH COUET OF JUDIC&TJRE AT BILASPUR (CG) W.P.HO. a/Wl-— Q-S 2004 ^ BETWBBN Gulab si.ng^yrosai: S/o Late Darbar Singh Tomar, aged about 50 years<^6ccupat3.on Xncbarge Biincipal, posted at sovt ^ Hr» §^^0"rid-ary School Bilalgarh District Eai@8$ (CG)« ^yy ^/ o^-cry PETITIONER ^^y ,••' .•<?•' A N D .^ '^^[^ 1« State of Chhattlsgarh, <i- ^\y Through Secretacy School Education Department, <t^^ D.K.Building, Ralpur (CG) . ^ 2. The Director, PUbl.Lc Instructions, Raipur » 3. The Collector, Raipur (CG). RESPOHDENTS WRIT PETITION UfrIDER ARTICLES 226/227 OP THE CONSTITUTION O ^QF INDIA ^(,.^i!JS».tj[^d^**W XI-HC-22 sn^r^r f^lNian^r sBiiti ylsn SCTI* 3ST '<iWM-^, »Tf)y'l$,fsldiy^'l, 3ll^i ^ach \ 3>^c) sj ifnvfTynWVa """"""'""" "fV^ 200 -w^TCTarwBfitr fbr advariced pt>sts 19^-2005 Mr. Awadh Tripathi, couns< Mr. U.N.S. Deo, Govt. Advd Heard both the counsei. Return has been flled on By this writ petition under) the petitioner has chalienged the | 9-2004 (Annexure P-1), whereb^ Sovt. Higher Secondary Schooij Secondary School, Dhamdha, petltioner is serving atthat piace The main argument that in the Biiaigarh school five pstitioner is working as Lecturerj is reiieved from that place, in t(i interest of the studente will suff^i reason the petitioner may be fact to the notice ofthe responderft The request made by lea\ fide, reasonabie and genuine to of Chhattisgarh has also no Having heard iearned facts and circumstances of the detailed representation to ail his grievances, and in turn, representation made by the ftree months from the dats of th4 ^rafeT'fr? wraf ^ tefl-dwzrc ^aTf^irsn^r tyvi ^! for ths petitioner. 4cate for the State/respondents. d> b^half ofthe State/respondents. lArticle 226/227 of the Constjtution of India, |lega!ity and propriety of the order dated 16- the petitioner has been iransferred from Bilaigarh, District: Raipur to Govt. Higher Djstrict: Durg. it is admitted position that the round about five years. by leamed counsel for the petitioner is of Lecturer are sanctioned and only the and he has aiready been transferred, if he lat case, there will be no teachsr and th® (r, Learned counsel submitted that for that altt^wed to make a representation bringing thig onderft authoriUes. 1'ned counsel for the petitioner seems bona hwhich tearned Govt. Advocate for the State objec|iion. coutisel for the parties and having regard to the [case, the petitioner is alfowed to mato a respon^ent No.1 within ten days from today raising (espondent No.1 is directed to consider the petiti|oner and decide the same within a period of rsceipt of the representation in an objective XI-HC-22 3^ ^ww<i, y-^ww, Rldlti^< 3ii^i i<a<h iiHc'fTsn*iith'""'"""""""yg^ 200<- an^T^iT f^:]R?3TI^T sh<IR)fffN' Soma ^SsSStS^SiS^- KSV^f- iSa 311^1 g'KI|iSKfff?tf 2--1 Wlfa'ftT ITPRffff fecA (RRZTC ^3ff^IT3TI^T griev^nces rdiev&d manner afier considering ths taw. The petitioner shouid not be With the direction aforesaid, Consequently, M.(W.)P.h| No.9590/2004 aiso stand disposed|of. Parties are entitled for certifi^d copy ofthisorder. of the petitioner, in accordance with tii! his reprsssntation is decided. the petition stands disposed of. los.4300/2004, 120/2005 and I.A. Sdl- L.C einao 3ud9e .doo