S^SS'Sil ^l^lSU d- r.ioo' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHATISGARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETITION N0. 3 S£TJ /2006 PETITIONER ^:sy> ^VtN'./'•' ^-w&>^ ^ -SlfiSI'ONDENTS G.R. Puraina, Son of Shri K-P- Puraina, Aged about^l years, PrSsently working as Rural Agriculture Extension Of&cer, Block Development, Nagari, Dhamtari, District-Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Department ofAgriculture, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Senior Agriculture Extension Of&cer, Dhamtari, District-Dhamtari (C.G.) y WRJT PETinON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION AND FOROTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. s-~4' XI-HC-78 HIHWI ^HTcfl 3^ •*ii<iici'4, atTlu'is, Rioi^y ^p..^.f.t^..g.€^.^200^ 3n^?ry^* (y<I^<sis.tT) aT[^T^iTf^:riq> OTT STI^T sti*<i»h ^giw^feT 3ii^r +i<ifci<n-f WRfrft'te1^ ^RSTC ^sri^irgn^r 19.7. t)y trans?er Shri Akhiiesh Dalpati, couns| Miss Dipali Pandey, Panel] advance copy. Heard By the instant petition, the p] 1st Juiy 2006 whereby he has DisSrict Dhamtari to Biock Nagari, The main grievance raised 'nad never requested for his has been transferred showing that thetransfer has been Learned counse! for the be atlowed to make a representa^ directed to decide the same, to whi] no obiection. Having heard iearned coun^ racts and circumstances of the petitioner that the petitioner never| has been shown to be transferred any opinion on the merits ofthe for the petitioner is just, fair and aliowed to make a detaiied to respondent No.1 raising ail his from today and in turn, respondent the petit'onsr within a period of representation, in an objective ii for the petitioner. Lawyer for the State/respondents, on ^titioner has chailenged the order dated fcjeen transferred from Block Dhamtari, C|istrict Dhamtari at his own expenses. t)y the petitioner in this petition is that he Withput his request the petltionsr 'i" '..^ ^"''. on his own sxpenses jnade on his request. petftioner submitted that the petitloner may |on to the respondent No.1 and he be i|sh iearned counse! for respondents has i^ei for the parties, having regard to the |case, as per the aliegations of the |requested for his transfer whereas, he |at his request, and without exprsssin< ca^e, the prayer made by iearned counsei r^asonable. Therefore, the petitioner is tion along with a copy of this petition Igrievances within a period of 10 days i.1 shaii decide the representation of days from the date of receipt of the ', after considering al! the 'points ca6e represe|itat 3t) mcnner, P.T.O. fci-;3,; ^-^•^SSsaaa-sel^- > jr XI-HC-78 3^^TPtT?PT, t!iT?lu'l<o, RldWy lTTOWgTlTW"'""""""""W[ 200 an^?Ty^<*> (tci^ci<<<r) sn^?rw R-fi* OTT3tI^rjt)*l STtfRRdfersn^r ^-_ ied that the effect and operation of the petitioner shall remain stayed, tiii the raised by the petitioner and pass| iav/. In the meantime, it is directi impugned order in respect of the| decision of the representation of th^ Wlth the direction aforesaidj Consequently, M.(W.)P. Noj: stand disposed of. Parties are entitled for certifi^d copy ofthis order. +i<iiy''(l-i wRffff feiA <te;n: ^sT^ir.sn^r appropriate order, in accordance with |he petition stands disposed of. S743/2006 and i.A. No.6891/2006 aiso L.C.Bhsdoo Judge