THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P. No. 16225 of 2000 Dated. 02–12-2010 Between: S. Ramakrishna …Petitioners Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Secretary, Higher Education, Hyderabad and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 16225 of 2000 ORAL ORDER: Substantially seeking regularization as a Junior Lecturer in Mathematics in G.V.S.R. & S.A.R. Junior College, Kollur, Guntur District (not impleaded as a respondent) is the writ petition filed. The petitioner was appointed as a Part-time lecturer on 02-07-1992. The post in which he was working is a post admitted to grant-in-aid. Claiming that he was not regularized in services despite having put in eight (8) years of service and since there was no response to his representation dated 05-11-1998, the wit petition is filed alleging that according to G.O.Ms.No. 328 Education (CE.III) Department dated 15-10-1997 (for short ‘the G.O.), the State Government has initiated a scheme of regularization of part-time junior lecturers and despite the orders of the Government, the respondents have not regularized his services. The Joint Director of Intermediate Education, Andhra Pradesh has filed counter affidavit, though he is not a party. It is left to this Court to presume that he represents the official respondents. Be that as it may. In the Joint Director’s counter it is stated that pursuant to a series of Government Orders for regularization of part-time junior lecturers in grant-in-aid institutions, eventually the G.O. was issued in suppression of all the earlier orders and condition No.5 of the G.O. enjoins consideration for regularization of those part-time junior lecturers who have put in service of three (3) academic years as on 30-07-1991 or five (5) academic years as on 25-11-1993, as the case may be; and who are continuing in service on the date of issue of G.O. i.e., 15-10-1997 are eligible for regularization; the Government order further enjoins that the part-time junior lecturers should have put in 360 working days as on 30-07-1991 and 600 working days as on 25-11-1993 for eligibility for regularization. It is further asserted in the counter that the petitioner was appointed as junior lecturer on 02-07-1992 and put in one year four month’s service by 25-11-1993 as against the required five (5) academic years of service and 600 working days and therefore is ineligible for regularization of his service in terms of the G.O. The counter also points out that the petitioner failed to state the name of the college where he had worked as part time junior lecturer prior to his joining in the 3rd respondent’s college, to claim the required period of 600 working days and five academic years of service as on 25-11-1993. In summation, the counter states that the petitioner is not entitled for regularization of his service as junior lecturer. No other legal basis for the petitioner’s claim is either pleaded or established. In view of the averments in the counter affidavit, which are unrebutted by the petitioner, no case is made out for interference or grant of relief. There are no merits. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. __________________________ JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM Dated: 02-12-2010 Pvks/*