ra132.11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 132 OF 2011 In WP/8179/2010 SOMNATH LAXMAN LTATHE THROUGH GPA PRAKASH LAXMAN TATHE VERSUS RAMNATH BABURAO TATHE ANDORS ... Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Mr. V H Dighe Advocate for Respondent(s) : Shri V.S. Bedre. ... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. Dated: August 03, 2011 ... Heard. 2 The learned Counsel for the review petitioner invited my attention to paragraphs 2 and 3 of the order of which review is sought. According to him, though the documents were produced before the trial Court, this Court has observed that no such documents were produced. Therefore, ra132.11 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ this observation may come in the way of the petitioner while prosecuting the suit. 3 The apprehension expressed by the review petitioner is ill founded. The observations, if any, in the order of which review is sought, are only for deciding the question of interim relief. Therefore, there is no question of reading any observation by the trial Court from the order dated 29th April, 2011 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 8179/2010. There is no merit in the review petition and the same stands disposed of. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) PLK/*