1 78cp375-11 rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 375 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. ..... Mr. Satish Upadhyay i/b. Mr. M. V. Kini & Co. for the petitioner. Mr. A. I. Patel, AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 3. ..... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 9, 2011. P.C.: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The breach alleged is of direction contained in paragraph No.3 of the order dated 3rd October, 2011 by the Division Bench of this Court. The learned AGP appearing for the contemnors states that in terms of the directions of this Court, a speaking order has been passed on 30th November, 2011 which has been communicated to the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that though the time fixed under 2 78cp375-11 the aforesaid order of the Division Bench to decide the representation was extended, the order is not passed even within the extended time. 3. In any case, though belatedly, there is a compliance made with the direction issued by this Court, hence, this is not a case where action can be initiated under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Petition is disposed of. (A.S.OKA, J.)