IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.28 of 2009 LALSA DEVI, WIFE OF HAJARI NUT, R/O VILLAGE-MURWA, P.S. ISUAPUR, DISTRICT- SARAN AT CHAPRA. -PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, SARAN AT CHAPRA. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SARAN AT CHAPRA. 5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MARHOWRAH. 6. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE OF POLICE STATION ISUAPUR, DISTRICT-SARAN AT CHAPRA. 7. NAGESHWAR MAHTO, SON OF LATE DARBESH MAHTO. 8. CHANDESHWAR MAHTO. 9. JUGESHWAR MAHTO. SERIAL NO.8 AND 9 ARE SONS OF NAGESHWAR MAHTO. 10. KANTI DEVI, WIFE OF LATE BHAGIRATH SINGH. 11. RAVI RANJAN SINGH, SON OF LATE BHAGIRATH SINGH, SERIAL NO. 7 TO 11 ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MURWA, P.S. ISUAPUR, DISTRICT-SARAN AT CHAPRA. -RESPONDENTS 2 12.02.2009 When the matter is taken up Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, contends that the petitioner shall be satisfied in case direction is given for the expeditious conclusion of Issuapur P.S. Case no. 23 of 2008. Having heard Mr. Verma, for the petitioner, Assistant Counsel to Additional Advocate General 3, for the State and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the petitioner shall be well advised to approach respondent no.4, 2 the Superintendent of Police, Saran, for expeditious conclusion of investigation of the aforesaid case. Needless to state that in case petitioner approaches respondent no.4, he shall ensure that investigation of the case is concluded without unnecessary delay. It is made clear that I have not expressed any opinion in regard to the merit of the case of the party. The application stands disposed off with the observation aforesaid. (C.K. Prasad, ACJ.) AAhmad