IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23272 of 2008 HARI OM PRASAD @ HARI PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 12.09.2008 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is named accused of a case which has been registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act regarding killing of the informant’s husband Chandradeo Yadav. Informant’s husband was being pressurized to vacate his shop, two days before the occurrence and there was dispute with regard to that. Informant’s son Vikash Kumar stated in Para -7 of the case diary that he has seen this petitioner loitering near the shop in the evening of the date of occurrence. Submission is that during entire evidence, no witness has come to say that he has seen the alleged occurrence. The petitioner is implicated with a view to old dispute. Similarly situated co-accused Gopal Prasad has already been enlarged on bail in Cr. Misc. No. 4682 of 2008 vide order dated 19.05.2008. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Hari Om Prasad @ Hari Prasad is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Sherghati in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 251 of 2007 (G.R. No. 828/2007). kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)