:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2058 OF SUIT NO. 2058 OF SUIT NO. 2058 OF 1998 1998 1998 WITH WITH WITH SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 1962 OF 1998 NO. 1962 OF 1998 NO. 1962 OF 1998 WITH WITH WITH SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 1963 OF 1998 NO. 1963 OF 1998 NO. 1963 OF 1998 WITH WITH WITH SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 1964 OF 1998 NO. 1964 OF 1998 NO. 1964 OF 1998 WITH WITH WITH SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1965 OF 1998 SUIT NO. 1965 OF 1998 SUIT NO. 1965 OF 1998 WITH WITH WITH SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 1995 OF 1998 NO. 1995 OF 1998 NO. 1995 OF 1998 WITH WITH WITH SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 1998 OF 1998 NO. 1998 OF 1998 NO. 1998 OF 1998 WITH WITH WITH SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2059 OF 1998 SUIT NO. 2059 OF 1998 SUIT NO. 2059 OF 1998 Nupran Trade and Investment Pvt. Ltd. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Hico Products Ltd. & Anr. ... Defendants. Mr. K.R. Parekh for the Plaintiff. Ms. Renuka Lele i/b. Haresh Mehta & Co. for Defendant 2. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 02ND 02ND 02ND FEBRUARY 2009. FEBRUARY 2009. FEBRUARY 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . Mr. Parekh, learned Advocate appearing for the Plaintiffs states that after the Suit was decreed against Defendant No.1, the matter was considered by the Plaintiffs and they have now taken a decision to withdraw the Suit against Defendant No.2. This decision is communicated to Mr. Parekh and he has received instructions to withdraw the Suit against Defendant No.2. :2: 2. All Suits are, therefore, placed on Board for withdrawal forthwith. The Suits are allowed to be withdrawn against Defendant No.2 and disposed off as such. No costs. Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)