IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION NO. 5 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 5 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 5 OF 2006 IN IN IN NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2753 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO. 2753 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO. 2753 OF 2005 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (l) NO. 941 OF 2005 (l) NO. 941 OF 2005 (l) NO. 941 OF 2005 IN IN IN ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 451 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 451 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 451 OF 2004 Vimal G. Jain. ] .. Petitioner /Appellant (Ori.Petnr.) Versus 1. Vertex Financial Service Pvt. Ltd. ] & Anr. ] .. Respondents (Ori.Defdts.) Mr. Bharat Vaishnava i/b M/s. B. Vaishnawa & Co. for the petitioner. Mr. Simil Purohit i/b Mr. Tushar Goradia & H. Nikumb for the respondent. CORAM: R.M. LODHA & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 17TH FEBRUARY, 2006 P.C. : . Heard Mr. Bharat Vaishnava, the learned counsel for the applicant and we perused the Affidavit of Shri Yatin Rasiklal Shah. In our view, the Affidavit of Shri Yatin Rasiklal Shah does not make out a case for review of the order dated 20th January, 2006. : 2 : 2. Review Petition is dismissed. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] [srpasha@hc]