r ^NNfr j,'^t^i^^ •^fi.^ ^ Qggle Beneb O INTHEfflGH COURT OFJUDICATUREATBD.ASPURfC.G) CONTEMPT CASE fONo. ^^ 2011 (Arising out oforder date 24.0i5.2011 passed by Hon'ble Justice Shri M. M. Shrivastava in W.P. No. 3265/2011) APPLICANT : . Manoj KumarNirmalkar S/o Late Vishnu ,^.*** Nirmalkar, aged about 34 years, ^5/illage-Lokhandi, Post-Mangla, -^^"'TS -^:"'^^\ Distt" BilasPur (C-G) ^L^\^ ^ o' cs'i:-"' CONTEMPTNORS 1 Non-Applicants ojafloy ^f^- VERSUS M. K. Raut Secretary Public works Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. D. K. Pradhan Chief Engineer Public works Department Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. R.K.Khambara Executive Engineer Public works Department (B & R) Bilaspur DivisionNo.l Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. S.K.Satpathi Sub-Divisional Officer Public works Department (B & R) Bilaspur DivisionNo.l Distt. Bilaspur (C.G) APPLICATION UNDER ARTICLE 215 O F T H E CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTACT T XI-HC—78 ^^^ Rt'iich ^ff Otl^t 5T>*1W *11*1CTT«»*1|ch 'S^T '^TPTT^PT, '^hTrre; fs|dl<H!j,< ^^......C.^.^S..^.&J....^1}/1 a»*iich ~" "" """""""""""""""""^t/20 ^ 200 ^TT^T "q^? ('^clt35I^f) ^wiW «fca^H^T SB : Hon?ble Shri Manindraf Mohan Shrivastava, J. 9.12.2011 Shri Viaod Dcshmukh Heard on admission. Subm.ission made bef< was issued to consider the vide order dated 24.6.2011 representation was made, th Learned counsel for fhj order of the Court required monfhs have.lapsed wifhor(t autfaority. Under Circular datedl required to be considered petitioner is a Chowkidar, Head of fhe Office ie. resl comply with fhe order oftih.4 specific tioie Umit has bee4 fhe concenied Head of the and consider fhe case of thk ^ lTWR!if "^ l^sft <F»i^K ^3tfiR^lT^?T counsel for fhe petitioner. |re the Court is that though a direction ^laim ofthe petitioner for regularization, passed in W.P. (S) No.3265/2011 and a matter has remaiaed undecided so far. petitioner submits faat fhe spirit of the |decisiou expeditiously, but, more th.on^S any decision taken by fhe competent 5.3,2008, fhe case of the petitioner is ^t the level of Head of the Ofiice. The [holder of Class-IV post, fherefore, the ^ondent No.4 is uiider an obUgation ta Court in its true spirit. Even though no prescribed, spirit of the order required Dffice to constitute Screeniag Committee s petitioner for regularization. The order ^ s'"~^-^ •^ .'^ ^ ^ i ^I^t^. j XI-HC—78 ^n^T^rfyfNT TOT ^n^T ^RTER' Prs^een r \' 'S^ ^i^i<yi<i, ^^•(-Klto, f®ldl'!-l^< *ii*iCTi gn*iici» """""^ 200 3n^TTRW (1<<f^<t<<^) 'C^nWRf^T 3^fT -2- which was passed eartier b the concerned Head oftiie Office As 5 moufhs have alteady petitioner's claim within a p^ji of copy of the order which i$ be at liberty to revive fhe pet|tion. I^eady lapsed, if no decision is taken on ^riod of 2 months from the date of receipt now beiag passed, the petitioner would With the aforesaid ob; of. <=M<<t<n<<li TTW^f ^ fe^ <rai<^i< ^^TRm^n^r this Court has to be complied with by as per the Circular dated 5.3.2008. Tvations, fhe petition is fiaaUy disposed Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge