IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No. 38 of 2009 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : APRIL 29, 2009 RAJIV KUMAR BALI ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Amar Vivek, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. AK Sharma, Senior DAG, Punjab. Mr. GPS Bal, Advocate, for private respondents. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) CM 7681 of 2009 The application is allowed. Written statement on behalf of respondents No.1, 2 and 4, along with annexures, is taken on record. CWP 38 of 2009 Essentially, it has been contended on behalf of the petitioner that the impugned orders are liable to be set aside on the ground that the Senior Superintendent of Police or the Deputy Commissioner cannot grant Civil Writ Petition No. 38 of 2009 (O&M) 2 police help to the private respondents to dispossess the petitioner from the shop in question. The effect of the impugned orders is that police help has been provided to the private respondents. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has referred to Annexure R-1/T dated 2.1.2009 whereunder the District Magistrate, Hoshiarpur, has ordered that the dispute being between private parties and the civil court being seized of the matter, the private party may file an execution to get warrant of possession from the civil court. The order for providing help to take possession has been withdrawn. Accordingly, the matter has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. April 29, 2009 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE