HON'BLE SHRI G.S.SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13298 OF 2006 Between: B.Rajitha …..Petitioner AND Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, State of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad & others. ...Respondents :: O R D E R :: Counsel for the petitioner : Sri D.Radhakrishna Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 : Government Pleader for Prohibition & Excise. Counsel for respondent No.3 : Sri K.Venumadhav 12th February 2007 Per G.S.SINGHVI, C.J. In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for issue of a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to take steps for shifting the wine shop being run by respondent No.3 on the ground that the same is located near temple and school. It is borne out from the record that during the pendency of the writ petition, the wine shop, which was being run by respondent No.3 in Ward No.9, Nirmal, Adilabad District has been shifted to Ward No.14. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that in view of the development which has taken place during the pendency of the writ petition, the proceedings of this petition may be closed with liberty to his client to file fresh petition against the location of wine shop in Ward No.14. Learned Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Sri K. Venumadhav, learned counsel for respondent No.3 say that they do not have any objection. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh petition questioning the location/ re-location of wine shop of respondent No.3 in Ward No.14, Nirmal, Adilabad District. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition as infructuous, WPMP. No.16525 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for issue of a mandatory interim direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider her representations is also disposed of as infructuous. G.S.SINGHVI, C.J. 12th February, 2007 C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J. ARS