1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 5541 OF 2009. Sukhlal Vithobaji Ramteke -: versus :- Kranti Shikshan Sanstha and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : MARCH 23, 2010. Heard Shri P.N. Shende, learned counsel for petitioner, Shri D.S. Wasnik, learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and learned A.G.P. for respondent no.3. Petitioner was appointed on 15.07.1995. Admittedly he was not possessing training qualification. He obtained D.Ed. Training qualification on 26.06.1998 and his services were terminated on 06.08.1998. Challenging that termination appeal was filed before the School Tribunal. School Tribunal has applied its mind and found that as petitioner was untrained, he had no right to post. It has further found that the undertaking by Management was of no assistance to him. This Court has on 05.02.2010 considered identical challenge and found that because of provisions of Rule 6 of the M.E.P.S. Rules, such untrained employee does not get any right to post and his services can be continued on 2 year to year basis. In view of this position, I do not find anything wrong with the view taken by the School Tribunal. Writ Petition is thus dismissed, with no order as to cost. JUDGE Rgd.