IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 2114 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: August 05, 2010 Randhir and others .....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.R.N. Singal, Advocate for the petitioners .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) This is a petition preferred by the petitioners against the order dated 22.5.2010 (Annexure P-1 (colly) whereby charge was directed to be framed against the accused under sections 148/323/324/307 read with section 149 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners assails the order framing charge on the ground that offence under section 307 IPC is not made out. According to him, the complainants never stated before the investigating agency that injuries were inflicted by the accused with intention to kill. This apart, he submits that injury No.1 was declared dangerous to life after two months of the occurrence. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. It is evident that during investigation, the investigating agency came to the conclusion that offence Crl. Revision No. 2114 of 2010 - 2 - under section 307 IPC was made out. The injured were referred to Pt. B.D. Sharma P.G.I.M.S., Rohtak, where one of the injuries was kept under observation. The said injury was on the parietal bone. Subsequently, on 24.4.2010, the said injury was declared dangerous to life vide report dated 5.4.2010 (Annexure P-5 (colly). Resultantly, the accused were charged under section 307 IPC. Since the present revision petition is directed only against the framing of charge, scope of interference by this court is limited. All the issues raised before this court can be gone into by the trial court at the time of trial. The revision petition is devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed. Nothing said hereinabove shall, however, be taken as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. August 05, 2010 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE 2