IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.861 of 2010 KAILASH YADAV SON OF RAMASHISH YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SHAHLADPUR, P.S. MANJHAGARH, DISTRICT – GOPALGANJ. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLY DEPT. OLD SECRETARIATE, PATNA. 2. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GOPALGANJ. 3. THE BLOCK SUPPLY OFFICER, MANJHARGARH, GOPALGANJ. ----------- 05. 31.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is for quashing the Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 104 of 2010 registered on 15th of May 2010. It is submitted that petitioner is a dealer and on account of the aforesaid police case, his dealership license got suspended. It is further submitted that without any specific allegation, petitioner has been made accused in the aforesaid case and as such, the first information report deserves to be quashed. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, submits that on perusal of the allegations made in the first information report, it would appear that the specific allegations have been made against the petitioner of concealing his identity and also misleading the enquiry team. Considering the submissions of the parties, it is expedient in the interest of justice that let the investigation of the aforesaid police case be completed expeditiously without unnecessary delay and upon completion of the investigation, police report be submitted forthwith. However, with respect to other grievance if any, it will be open for the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the concerned Superintendent of Police who will look into the matter as per law. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)