IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27045 of 2008 SUBHAS CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.7.2008 Heard. As may appear from the F.I.R. itself, brother of the informant was a deaf and dumb person and he had accompanied the petitioner only to visit the locality to which the petitioner belongs. The admitted case of the prosecution is that while the petitioner and the brother of the informant were taking tea in a tea shop, the petitioner went to some other place nearby in connection with some work and when he came back he found the brother of the informant not there. The brother of the informant is still traceless. The contention is that there could not be any intent. What has been stated in the F.I.R, it was a bonafide act of taking the brother of the informant with the consent of the family members of the informant. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances and the contention, let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bon of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. case no.254 of 2007. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha, J )