1 APPLN 5154 OF 2010 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5154 OF 2010. Rasheda w/o Abdul Wadood .. Applicant -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. R. B. Raghuvanshi, with Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, for the Applicant. Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent State. Mr. N.R.Bubna, Advocate for the Intervenor/original complainant. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 17th January, 2011. P.C. 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by an Administrator of the Hostel in Madarasa Religious School, who is alleged to have caused a female student aged about 17 to 20 years to consume acid. This incident allegedly took place on 30.6.2010 at 2.00 p.m. at the place where all inmates take bath. Investigation has made substantial progress and statement of other inmates of the hostel do not support the victim’s story that the applicant either by herself or through some one else forced the victim to consume acid. 2. The learned counsel for the intervenor submitted that the victim is still struggling in the hospital. All the same, it is not clear as to why custodial interrogation of the applicant is necessary. In view of this, in the event of 2 APPLN 5154 OF 2010 applicant’s arrest, in CR No.I-94/2010, registered with Azad Nagar Police Station, Malegaon, District: Nashik, she be released on bail on her furnishing PR Bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.50,000/- on the following conditions:- i) The applicant shall make herself available on 20th January, 2011 at 11.00 a.m. for interrogation by Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required Investigating Officer. ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. i) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, in S.L.P No.7615 of 2009. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)