IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1440 of 2008 RATAN LAL BANKA Versus AMIT KUMAR BANKA & ANR ----------- 2. 3.9.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order allowing amendment in the plaint does not suffer from any jurisdictional error, especially when it is found that the suit was filed on 28.7.2006 seeking declaration of title in which on account of subsequent event of alleged dispossession on 14.7.2007 the plaintiff had filed an amendment petition on 6.10.2007 introducing large number of facts but all pertaining to the main issue of being dispossessed and accordingly, adding relief of recovery of possession. In the opinion of this Court such order allowing amendment in the plaint does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. In the result, this application is dismissed. It goes without saying that in view of amendment allowed the petitioner, defendant in the title suit, be allowed time for filing additional written statement 2 which must be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. ( Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/