1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2419/2009 Sayyed Husanara Harun Rashid Mulla Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.S.K.Mulla for the Applicant Mrs.Shinde,APP for the State CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J. (VACATION COURT) DATE : 26h MAY,2009. P.C. . The applicant has filed this anticipatory bail application as the anticipatory bail application is rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge , Islampur on 13/5/2009. The offence is registered against the applicant/accused (for short applicant) u/s 420,406,465,468, read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code vide C.R.No.30/2009 at Islampur.The applicant was involved in the scheme of collection of training 2 fees for the training given to the rural ladies for joining different parts of peculiar dolls . Approximately an amount of Rs.4,125/- was collected from each female member by accused no.1 who has launched the scheme. The applicant was somehow convinced with the scheme and also participated in collecting the money and making rural women members in the said scheme. However,after few months she realised that the payment of wages was not regularly made and in fact it was stopped and so also the deposits collected by accused no.1 were not returned to the lady members , so she lodged complaint against accused no.1 and 2 . However,the police during the course of investigation due to her active participation in launching the scheme made her an accused. Hence this application. 2] Perused the order of the Sessions Court. The Sessions Court has lost sight that the applicant is a complainant and she has taken initiative in lodging criminal case against accused nos.1 and 2 after realisation of the misappropriation and fraud in the said scheme. The active participation in launching the said scheme is the only 3 accusation against her. However,it appears from the record that she herself is not pioneer of the scheme. 3] The applicant is practicing advocate at Ashta , District Singli and she has her roots at Ashta. Thus, it is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail . Hence the order. O R D E R a] In the event of the arrest , the applicant be released on her furnishing cash bail of Rs.10,000/-. b] The applicant will not interfere in the investigation and will co-operate the investigation agency. c] The applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence or witnesses . d] Violation of any condition will amount to cancellation of bail forthwith. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)