1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 3522/09 [ Surajkumar Madhavprasad Mishra vs. Stae of Maharashtra ] ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. S.D.Chopde, Advocate, for the applicant, Mr. A.P.Thakare, APP, for respondent State. CORAM : P.D. KODE, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 27, 2009. Heard. Having regards to the reasons for which an ad-interim direction was passed on 20th November, 2009, and hardly any progress being reflected from the Case Diary during the investigation for a crime which was registered on 25th September, 2009 and learned APP upon instruction from the Investigating Officer Shri P.S.Akotkar, API, P.S.Dahihanda, Distt. Akola, having stated that the applicant having attended the I.O for the purposes of investigation and having regard to the age of the applicant, apparently there is no reason for not confirming the protection given earlier for the limited period i.e. up till submission of the charge-sheet. Hence, ad-interim anticipatory bail granted vide order dated 20th November, 2009, is hereby confirmed up till filing of the charges in the relevant crime on the same terms & conditions. 2 Application stands disposed of with a liberty to the prosecution to apply for cancellation in the event of breach of any condition imposed. Case diary perused and returned. JUDGE Rvjalit