fiF^@^5;)f^.s VFa ^. ^?" ?.F i'^ s BENCr a\\^ ....• l..--"$.^^J?--'" -...•••"^^.:?\'\c.l-"" ^•:^%c'^^-"" <^^(oo2 (2) !ec'e" INTHBfftOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.5'6a5'/2006 PET1TIONER RESPONDENTS Sagar Ram Dahariya, S/o Shri Bhagchand Dahariya Age about45 years, Asstt.Teacher, Govt. PrimarySchool, Chingariya, Block - Tilda, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS State Govt. of Chhattisgarh* Through: Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Raipur (C.G.) WR1T PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioner most humbly submit as under:- HI0H COURT OF CHHATTESSARH AT BILASPUR Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents W. P. (51 No. 5623 of 2006 Smt. Ishwari Pandey Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & another W.P. (S) No. 5624 of 2006 Ku. Sushila Verma Versus State 60vt. of Chhattisgarh & cnother W. P. (5) No. 5625 of 2006 Ku. Shdiena Parveen Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & another W. P. (S) No. 5626 of Z006 Rajendroi Prosad Soni Versus State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & onother W. P. (S) No. 5627 of 2006 Tok 5in9h Verma Versus Sta+e ©ovt.of Chhattisgarh <& cmother W. P.(5) No. 9628 of 2006 Ramgopal Chaturvedi Versus State ©ovt.of Chhattisgarh & anotiier W. P. (S) No, 5629 of 2006 Smt. Sandhya Sharma Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & another W. P. (S) No. 5630 of2006 Rakesh Kumar Sahu Versus State 6ovt. of (.hhattisgarh & another W.P. (5) No. 3631 of 2006 Versus Lakhan La! Patel Sta-te 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & anotiier Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents W. P. (5) No. 5632 of 2006 Ku. Jeera Padhyofy Versus State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & another And W. P. O No. 5633 of 2006 Sagar Ram Dahariya Versus State Govt. of Chhatl-isgarh & ano+her Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. JusticeSatish K. Agnihotri. Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, 6ovt. Advocate for respondents/State. ORDER >rt (13tt1 October, 2006) 1. Leamed counsel oypearing for •the petitioners submits that while working os Assistmt Teachers.the petitioners have gone on training to improve their qualifications on their own expenses and acquired B. Ed./B.TJ. Examination Certificate. 2. The present writ petitions. being W.P.(5) Nos. 5623/2006, 9624/2006,8625/2006,5626/2006,5627/2006, 5628/2006. 5629/2006, 5630/2006, 5631/2006, 5632/2006 and 5633/2006 involve similar facts and common question of law. Thus,,these petitions are bein9 disposed of by this common or-der. 3. According to leamed counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners are entitted to two advonce increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumdr Bharadwaj Vs. Municipat Corporation, burg and another {2006 CS) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, D.urg and another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B.Ed./B.TJ. Examination Cert'ificate on his own expenses, are covered by the circular dated 24.12.98 issued by the State Govemment of Madhya Pradesh. 4. Leamed counsel for the petitioners further submits that the facts and question of law involved in the present cases are squarely covered by decision of this Court' jn the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, burg and onother (Supra), to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents fairly concedes and agrees with the averment made by leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporotion, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.TJ. Examination Cert-ificate on their own r expenses or not. No order as to costs. 6. A copy of this order beplaced on record of other connected writ petitions. Subhash Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotrl Judge