1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.01.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD).No.35 of 2011 1. Muthupandi 2. Balamurugan 3. Pitchaimani 4. Sureshkumar 5. Muniyandi 6. Prabhu 7. Sathish 8. Moorthy 9. Muniyandi 10. Gurusamy ...Petitioners Vs 1. State: rep. by Inspector of Police Pattiveeranpatti Police Station Dindigul District(Cr. NO. 215 of 2010) ... Respondent/Complainant 2. Ilayaraja ... Respondent/De-facto complainant PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to Crime No. 215 of 2010 dated 6.11.2010 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Pattiveeranpatti Police Station, Dindigul District and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr. S.Deenadhayalan For 1st Respondent: Mrs. Devasena, Government Advocate For 2nd Respondent: Mr. Maharaja O R D E R This Petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking to quash the case in Crime No. 215 of 2010, dated 6.11.2010 on the file of the first respondent. 2. Heard Mr. S.Deenadhayalan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mrs. Devasena, learned Government Advocate appearing for the first respondent and also Mr. Maharaja takes notice for the second respondent/de-facto complainant. 3. The first petitioner and the second respondent is present before this Court and they have filed Memorandum of compromise entered into between them. However, the offence said to have been committed by the petitioners are under Sections 147, 148, 336 and 307 of IPC and it cannot be quashed in the proceedings before this Court. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the second respondent/de- facto complainant would submit in his argument that he is also willing to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 file affidavit to that effect before the Investigating Officer/the first respondent. 5. Accordingly, this Court is inclined to direct the second respondent/de-facto complainant to file affidavit before the Investigating Officer/the first respondent regarding the compromise arrived between them and on filing such affidavit by the de-facto complainant before the respective Investigating Officer/ the first respondent, the said Officer are directed to do the investigation after due consideration of the affidavit and to complete the same preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction, this Petition is disposed of. SD DEPUTY REGISTRAR ( WRITS ) /TRUE COPY/ ASST REGISTRAR vsg To 1.The Inspector of Police Pattiveeranpatti Police Station, Dindigul District 2.The Addl. Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai 1CC TO MR. S. DEENADAYALAN, ADVOCATE, SR: 1190: DM:2011:JAN:24: Crl.O.P.(MD).No.35 of 2011 10.01.2011 2P:4C:; https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/