IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2009 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 25923 of 2008(J) -------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. CLR WORKERS UNION (INTUC), CHITTUR-TATTAMANGALAM UNIT, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ARUMUGHAM. 2. ARUMUGHAM, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.APPASWAMY, SWAMI VILAS ROAD, THATHAMANGALAM.PO., PALAKKAD. BY ADV. MR.RENJITH THAMPAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. CHITTUR-TATHAMANGALAM MUNICIPALITY MUNICIPAL OFFICE, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD., REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SECRETARY, CHITTUR-TATHAMANGALAM MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. MR.A.SREERAMAKRISHNAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.25923/2008-J: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE G.O.(P).NO.370/2007/FIN. DTD. 14/08/2007. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY P.2. AND OTHERS INCLUDING RECEIPT DTD. 20/11/07. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT MUNICIPALITY IN W.P.(C).NO.14795/05 ALONG WITH THE COPY OF THE LIST OF CLR WORKERS. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE MEMO FILED BY ADVOCATE SREERAMAKRISHNAN ON BEHALF OF THE CHITTUR MUNICIPALITY IN W.P.(C).NO.14975/05 ALONG WITH THE LIST OF CLR WORKERS. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DTD. 30/08/08. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: EXT.R1: COPY OF THE G.O.NO.116/06 LOCAL SELF GOOD (A) DEPT., DT. 13/01/2006. EXT.R1.A: COPY OF THE HONOURABLE MUSTER ROLL FOR 2000 JANUARY OF THE WORKERS THE PETITIONERS. EXT.R1.B: COPY OF THE NOMINAL MUSTER ROLL FOR THE MONTH OF 2000 FEBRUARY OF THE WORKERS/PETITIONERS LEDGER SHOWING. EXT.R1.C: COPY OF THE FESTIVAL ALLOWANCES RECEIVED BY THE WORKERS ON 10/09/2008. EXT.R1.D: COPY OF THE NOMINAL MUSTER ROLL OF THE WORKERS/PETITIONERS FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST 2007. EXT.R1.E: COPY OF THE NOMINAL MUSTER ROLL OF THE WORKERS/PETITIONERS FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST 2008. EXT.R1.F: COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT OF THE HIGH COURT IN W.A. 1098/07. EXT.R1.G: COPY OF THE REVIEW PETITION DTD. 04/12/08 FILED IN THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT AGAINST THE DECISION IN W.A. 1098/07. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. V.GIRI, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C).No.25923 of 2008 ------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of March, 2009. JUDGMENT The limited prayer made by the petitioners is for a consideration of the prayer in Ext.P2 by the respondent Municipality. 2. I heard learned counsel for the Municipality also. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. A representative of the 1st petitioner shall be heard before orders are passed. Other contentions made by the petitioners in this writ petition are left open. Sd/- (V.GIRI) JUDGE sk/ //true copy//