HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 23rd June, 2011 2nd Bail Application No. 178 of 2010 Order on the bail application of the accused. Bhupendra @ Chhottu S/o Molhad Singh ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party In Case Crime No. 420 of 2010 U/s 395, 397, 412, 120B I.P.C. Police Station Kotwali Roorkee District Haridwar Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Bhuvnesh Joshi, the learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Vivek Shukla, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. T.C. Aggarwal, the learned Addl. G.A. for the State. The 1st bail application was rejected by an order dated 26th November, 2010. The applicant is in jail since 21st September, 2010. The applicant contends that he is a carpenter and was doing the work in the house of the complainant and instead of paying his due reimbursement, a charge has been levelled against the applicant that he has stolen Rs.20,000/-. In the light of the aforesaid, without commenting anything further on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Consequently, the Bail Application is allowed. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 420 of 2010, U/s 395, 397, 412 and 120B I.P.C., on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 23.06.2011 Shiv