IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA. CWP No.: 10972 of 2011-H. Decided on: 21.12.2011. Devinder Chauhan son of Shri Matha Ram, resident of village Jeek, Post Office Mahasu, Tehsil Kotkhai, District Shimla, H.P. … Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Himachal Pradesh through its Secretary, Horticulture, Shimla – 171 002. 2. Director Horticulture, Nav Bahar, Shimla- 171 002. … Respondents. Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. _____________________________________________ Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. _____________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Naresh K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General. ____________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer(s):- “(a) Issue appropriate writ or direct in the facts and circumstances of the case directing the respondents to regularise the petitioner from the day he completed 10 years as daily wage worker and all consequential benefits. (b) grant all the benefits of regular employee with back wages from the date they completed 10 years as daily wage.” 2. The petitioner claims work charge status/ regularization with all consequential benefits from the date he has completed 10 years of continuous service. Reliance is placed on the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316. 3. The learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioner submits that he would file appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for him to do so. The second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in the light also of the decision referred to above, within a period of another four months. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment, referred to above, while submitting the representation. 3. The writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice (Justice Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 21, 2011. (sck/hl).