/ ^^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUMCATURE AT BILASPUR {&&) WRIT PETETION ( C ) N0. ^ ^/^F 2009 PETCTEONER Hawa Bi Wd/o. Jabbar Ali, aged about 50 Years, by Caste - Musalman, Occupation - Bussiness of Hotel, R/o. Katghora, Tahsil Katghoira, Distt.- Korba (C. 6.) VERSUS ^" RESPONDENTS :1.' The State of Chhattisgarh, through theSecretary Department of Arban Administration, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.6.) './^ v^"/ .v--'~ .••"' ^i^-/' 2. ^'.^?:' t'l*"' >A'" 3. <i: -?>• ^^ The Cotlector, Korba, bistt.-Korba (C.6.) The Sub bivisionat Officer ( Revenue) ,Katghora, Distt.- Korba (C.4&.) ^ 4. 5. Nagar Panchayat Katghora, through its, Chief Municipal Officer, Katghora, Distt.- Korba ( C.6.) Ompraksh Gupta S/o. Satyanarayan Gupta,, aged about 40 Years, R/o. Katghora, Tahsil - Katshoira, Distt.- Korba (C.6.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFIN5IA, s. \^ ^EET^nziRTq, ^ww. -f^iray ^...^.^...^..•..^^ °f sn^t^t R-fi+ sn^l ^PlWHi^I <t]<llrt41l Wdl'^l^t^RSre •^siPgtisn^r SB : Hon'ble Shri Manlndral 7.01.2011 Shri Sunil Sahu, couns BIohaiL Shriyastai^, J. ;1 for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, | Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents No. 1 to 3\ Shri Si.imesh Bajaj, coi^isel for respondent No.4. Shri Ghansh^'am Patel, |counsel for respondent No.5. Heard. Leamed counsel for thd petitioner, at the outset, submitted that though this petition w^.s flled.aggrieved by orders dated 1.7.2009 and 17.8.2009, attl) and fhe plaint was returned ic time when the suit was dismissed ^nd the appeal was also dismissed, durmg pendency of this peti^ion, now, after complying with the provision of Section 80 of C.F].C., the petitioner has fUed another suit seeking declaration an<^ permanent injunction. In fhese circiunstances, leamed couns^l for the petitioner subimts that he be permitted to withdrawt the petition with liberty to pursue his remedy in the suit. Leamed coiuisel furtheil- submits that as fbis Court had already granted him interi|m protection vide order dated 28.8.2009, fhe interim prote<j;tion may be continued for some [^Sfeq VXI-HC-22 sn^r'qn fc;-ii?»i sn§?i 9hH\'^ ^R^ Fravfcen \^ ^~SET -41'41d<<, eiTil'M'ls, (««1iuy,< *iit1PII gWlcti 3TI^?F ^SIWdf?^ -2- tiine so as to allow fhe petitio^ier before ttie Court below for gratit On the other hand, submitted that the protectic certain period so fhat it may r ledmed submislsions Considering the the parties, the petition is dis): the petitioner pursue the rem^ The interim protection dated 28.8.2009 shaU remairi from today or untU decision! application, whichever is earlij 'nl^fcl'il'l ^wS ^ fs^S <F>ltdi< •^ a.riig'q .w^r to move appropriate application of injunction. counsel for the respondents >n, if granted, may be limited to lot be misused. made by leamed counsel for disjiiissed as withdrawn wifh liberty to sm^dy before fhe dvil Court. granted by this Court vide .order 1 tn force for a period of 3 nionfhs of the injunction application/stay ;r. SdA il{ Manindra Mohan Shrivastavat Judge |J