IN WE HIGH COUItT OF KARNATAKA AT B ANGALOBE DAflD WIS IlL 26TH DAY OF MAY, 1998 FF0 £ IRE H0N’BLE Mi JUSTICE TLL.DATTU Will Pi 13 1i993 BETWEEN : M.S. Aradhyamath s/a, sangayya, aged about 30 years, Tabla Accompanist Jniversity College of Music, Dharwad, PETITIONLR (By Sri ll,C. Sundaresh for Ms yanitrs 4cocin pq A4V I AND Karnataka University Jniversity Campus Parvate Na;ar), iaraadby its p star .. £ D (By Sri Pravn Kumar gaikote, Adv.) This win p tition is I leG tmder rticles ‘ ndJ2 Co ti no ada ito rayer to quash a not flea ion ted ,jfl, 991 and etc. p io mi on hanE is C tmd t ol 0 H 0 E U r a a i a a iste Dec’s - in isic. 4e i halo a th s Lou I ) a inter alia seeking a writ in the nature of cefli— orari to quash the notification issued 17 the res pondent Universi y date’ 01.1 1991 n o far as it relates to the post of lectu er in ‘rabla flhzsio) in tie University college of uharwad sol ly a the ground that petftsnersas not allet for the inter— vies and secondly for a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for the post lecturer in Tabli on merits. 2. Lespondeit University a a istificationdated 01 19 1991 aid invited applications from litbie a d qualifie candidates for several posts of fltsarers in the University. One of the pOsts for which appli— ation were invited by tie Univeri y aas fo the post of lecturer insstc. The notification also prescribed the e igi’ flitj crit via for the caadi a tes ap ly o St os of et r di re t disciplines. One sixth criteria was that the candidate mith es nrc im less than344fm ks t It ter Deee amattinin is Fiats jector its equivalent grade anti :hould possess good academic re ord tie Pursuant to tue aforesaid not i(ic..t ion is.us by tie Gniversifl, petitionur bad aplled ii, ttt )ost o e e a a c ag sa lls .. I e3e per noces iary qual if iwhations SB/the eligibility C rite— na pi senib d inn r the notifieation. Sin e tie was not oald for the intervidw for tie post of Ieofl— r r in ii,i. Ii lad irproache thi Coifl for tie reliefs as indicated r me earlier. 4. e4pondents one filed detnle statement of objections. In that they oateonicaIly assert that p tit’oner at cured less than Sit of ta’ks in the )laster’s egree ezaminat ion in Mysic and since be tEnot fulfill tha requicitr condition, und r the notification, he was not called for the interview by the University. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioirr is n t in a position to disputethe assertions ate .., te F spoidet Ltive sit, no. h is in a positon to bring to my notice t”iat petitioner had scoured re ha 5 o ears a he at ‘soerreexale nations in Music. In view of that I am left with no a alit I a path ass’ n a b tue respondent University. . neptit is’ di no hive I. qi i qtnlification, rl4htlv tie reon ent rniwrsilar hat I o t i f p1 a turd in Music. This court cannot t ike any exemption . •. I. t to toe action of the Uniwrsity and this Court A<.’ I annot tsta the ac ion f he respon ent University as irbitrary o illegaL In that vies of the matter, the rd let sought for by the pe tiorgr in this writ petition cannot be granted by tlii ourt, Accordily petition s reject d. In the f ots and dr t mstances of t case part s are directed to bear their own costs, Ordered acco dtng lv JUDGE itsji Js,