WP/10387/2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10387 OF 2009 Ronak Industries Ltd., Mumbai ... Petitioner V/s. Kaushik A. Yadav ... Respondent Mr. V.P. Savant for the Petitioner. Mr. B.S. Talwar for the Respondent. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE : 24 TH NOVEMBER, 2010. P.C. : 1. This Writ Petition has been filed challenging an order which has been passed in 2005. The Petition has been filed in 2009. No explanation whatsoever has been given either in the Petition or in the arguments advanced as to why there has been a delay in preferring the Writ Petition. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that paragraph No.15 of the Petition would indicate why there has been a delay. In my opinion, the pleadings in paragraph No.15 do not demonstrate as to why the petitioner was unable to approach this Court expeditiously after the impugned order was passed. 3. The Writ Petition is, therefore, rejected.