^—:-n"^ .9 (Jail) <2; J. ff< R.fl-91 CrT^ "\ ^ ^ CF0000057723 pc ^ •^- ^o. 9s-^, \c>{~fJ?STQff7^~ Fathcr's name ^F^/ST- -^^j-^ •^T^-y ^-- ~<r^'i7^7^/', ^^ "^^ Jesidence ,-lfeD—°<^^ T^ 4iD qf<^ SeatcBccd to ^f4^T ^'m^W • 6^~ on /^-^^/^ la^ <JT 6 ^S" s.ffyjn^^ y Under Section. •^^ •acz' -w^^''^.^ ^ ^^pVv)^ ~ ^T^fJf S-f^ ^TiT »~^W]WzT^ 3^/^^P" ^-^> - / ^"~ 1 - . . . .-. - 5^^0- J3S-/^J -/ is explained to the ^isonet ttet cf fae states he wishes to be re^reseated by a legal prActitioaer the appsllateCouftwiUnof^rt^M^'iththe ca^e fjr se/ei diys ua'esi ihs tegal practitioDcrappcars eariier. JTfttielegaIi^g^tioaierdoesnot appear withinsevea days he may not hcard at all iftbe prisetier states fliat he does hot wish to be reprfr- ^jited by legal practitioner the court may proceed at once with the cas^ and will not be obliged to give a heariagto any lcgalpractitioner wbo should appcar. u ^ v ff' ti fc;. s .'^ Date of Apptication for copyofjudgemeat 2 Date oa which copy rewived,^ ^ Date oa wlnch Appeal Seot • ._._ 4 Wfacthet thc prtsoacr wishcs to bc rcpresented or not. > f7 8/^?i -SV/ ^l ^€iirv°L -f—7 No, ^L. -^.s^ Name Confiae^ iiD_ -^ .^T' ^hS^~ Jait ^s^S—5^-^S^€ —^^3 CS>^^L_^. No. 4^ /<^^^ _^ Oated ^^Z/^ E^_-—^ Forwardcd to the .,S^^^ ^^ ^ir ^3M^^!SWf~ ^'s^^r .^ to gcthcr with a copy of judgcmcat or ©rdcrpat^ed^(/^ie casjs Jor ftayour i&f transmission to tte propcrAppeUatc cpurt. ^.—^^^^/ _ S'^^0. J3S/9^ -^}- -,. ([^^r .ys^-^r^-^^! / . . Cent^l j8^^atp'a& (S'f^ y^\ Officc Date ©freceipt in Date of receipt of record to accoBipany tfae Memo ^f Appeal to thc Appellate ccurt , , ^ '^T "•^. -^' No. Dated Forwarded t@ the Dteiteof receipt iaAippeUale caurt //"-:r ^ w^- f;-% 199, ^..& ;a ^A@ALPUR ^t flyh'i^ y ^^^g. i^2&*^..-. l*n^ ??^N^Sft-" •—.SW»t'*-S!f£.V, ''STe^. ^^h <"08r^ Majgor ^ ^•owaeKa^K ., i^~r.aj ® ^8*i«l^W^ ^Tyq -^liqic^^, t?-ai^<l<?, PicOiWy< .(J?...ft,...(.0.2T^.4. ^ff^^T^TR^icb ?[SH3?1^^T3?Wf? 3TT^?7 ^StS (^cji^d^) ^RTT^?^f^ 317^^1 &i¥Jsiort - Hon'ble Mr. L.C. Bhadoo ond Hon'bSe Mr. bhirendra Mishra, ; 19-1-2006 AAr. Satyendra Sahu, couns Mr. U.N.S» Deo, Additiona! Oral judgment dictated on P®rL.C. Bhadoo, J. By this appea! under Secti Ram has qyestioned th-e jegaiity sentence dated 2"8nl994 pass< Ambikapur, !n TrioJ. No.; Judge after holding the accused/ his father nam€iy,.Su9han Ram, c and sentenced to undergo impriso defauit of payment of fine to fyn Facts for the d at 4,30 p.m. accused Soha? residence, they ^ere tdking, d^ house, brou-ghtQ cro^bar ond Gtfi nmce, as a result of which Sugh< B!ood ^tQrted oozing- out of the i and the niatter vvas reported by SP/FS/2005-20 cpl<<ic)<i1l^ ^l^oT^f^^^FFST? ^OTJ^FT 311^^1 z. si for the appeijant. Publjc Prosecutor for the State/respondent. Da/^ ?n 374 (2) of the CrP.C.. appejiant Sohor 5ai of the judgment of conviction and order of ^d by the 1 Addltlonai Sessions Judqe, ,35/93, ^hereby iearned AdditionQi Sessions appeliant guiity for commjttjng the murder of onvicted him under Section 302 of the I.P.C rment for !lfe and poy a fine'of Rs.1,000/-, m •her undergo RJ. for si'x months. isposai of this appeal ore that on 23-11-1992 Sd and his father Svghan Rom ^ere at the of a sudden, the accused i^ent inside the xcked his fother ^ith the crowbar on his in received injury o-n head and feii do^n. ijurles. Sorponch ^W-2} WQS calied ^radhan Ram (PVV-5) in Police Stations RQjpur. Xi-HC-78 ^3:5c[^rajc6Z?, t?Ti1<(-i''l<?, 1cirt8<<-l^ ^ag^. „, ... .^^. .:. .l'^ - . .\«^ .-STTT?^./- • k .^r" ^200^ ^?Tq^ (^cjI'S<si<s) ^fI^Tf^Flte ?CT^^T^R g^lT^^^IOT^^ -2--1 <S?Tr5fe^TWF1^f^fl^^ <<RitC8^ ^3Tf^T3?^5T Th©Station House Officer afterl 11 left for the of occurr4 and the body for postmm4 Centre,' Rojpyr,' ^here Dr, P.L. prepared the post-mortem reporj •Dr. P.L. Verma and he' prepared tl^ police custody memorcindym crowbar and in pursuance of that, After compietion of invest^ Jydicial Magistrate, First Ciass, the Sessions Judge, AmbikapurJ Jud9e/AmbikQpur, received the o The prosecution examined recorded under Sectlon 313 of.ti evjdence and statecj that he has registering the first information report .Ex.P" ;nc@, prepared Panchnama of the bod)^. Ex.P-1 rtem excimJnation to the Communjty HeQith Verma .(PW'a4) conducted post-mortem and |l ExP-4. The injuries ^ere also exomined by i©injury report Ex.P-10. The occused ^hile in pxPml2 regarding the place ^her®he kept the Ithe crowbar recoyered under Ex.P-°13. gation, chorge sheet fiied in the Court of tmbikapur, 'm turn committed the to from where Jearned 1 Additionai Sessions rse on transfer for triai. hen witnesses. Statement of the occused WQS ^e CrP.C. m ^hich he the prosecution been fdsely implicated m the crime, he ^as e in question ond- he ^as taking treatme.nt for mentoily upset at the time of crinl that, One nameiy, Thoia ^am in defence. After hearing t.h©argymen for the occused, iearned Additio| thc accused as mentioned in pora f te of Additional Publjc Prosecutor anci coynsel ia! Sessions Judge convjcted and sentenced l-lol of this judgment. • - (£) \3-oq ^iqirtq, y^-l^ti, Rjc6N+^ 'TPT^T ^^T^? ••—••••—•—••••••—•••/•• • • •/• 3TT^5T q^P((jc|ij6|^) ^Ft2@a 3TI^5T^TR^W ^iT3H^5Ta^m? V--. \.. ^R!T^R^?f3?T^$T '^ We hwe heard Mr. Satyc and Mr. U.N.S. D@o,; ieamed- Ai State/respondent. Jhe homiddd .death of-'i question ^GS ^itnessea? by Cher! cjearly stated in her. evidence husband) were sittir^ outside trGnsportation of paddy, oi! of took the croiffbGr and assauited i^ \QW on wh'ich she raised cries and ^dra Sahu, leamed counset for the appeSlant Iditjonal Public Prosecutor on behaif of the }ughc?n Rar!i is not in dispute. The crime in fci Bai (PW-8), wife of the accused, ^ho has ^hat her fQther-in-la^ and the accused (her the house, they were tdking regarding sudden,the accused came inside th©house, ith the cro^bar on th@ head of her father-in" p\ood storted oozin9 out of the injuries. Krishna Prasad (PW-7) ha| froin the of the house of Su^ thot the assayitlng to him that he shouid run a^ Tl'serefore, ih vie^ of thj Qccysed/appeIJant assaylted of ithich he died. Mr. Satyendra Sahu, !ear| attacked the ^|i death in a heat of passion all offence against the. QCcused/Q^peiiant Part-II of the I.P.C. cpk^fo<il<ri *ij<ic^l'^'f^l<l ^^d8^ ^3ri^T3ff^5T stQted in his evidence thot on hearing cries ihan Ram he rushed toi^ards that and saw >ughan,Rcsm with a cro^bar. ^e accused-also iv other^ise he. ^ould attQck him ai.so. above evidence, it is estabiished thot the Sughan Ram ^ith the crowbar, as a resuit cd counsel for the appeilant ©rayedthat the th the cro^bar ^ithoyt any intention to )f a sydden in Q sudden quarrei, therefore, not trGvei beyond Section 304 SP/FS/2005-20,1 Xi-HC-78 ^c|:?2TRTiW5, SF^NtS, lcsomy fagS^f »»»»»» »\-^£/a•»^*» • •«• a • • •»»/. a^. Ja N « ^^7q^?(^qi361ts) ^^Tcg?T<^:jt^ ?iaST3n^ST3CTR? .On the other.hand, Mr. U.N.| the jodgment of the trio. .In order to'appredate the the oppeliQnt, we have/perused the the erlme, in 7 of cross-a-ex< inddent !egs of the were s| 5), bdged the report/ has stc mentaliy disturbed, for that, treat given ten prior to the inci Therefore, 1n viei^ of the obj not mentoiiy flt ond that is why hi^ time of incident, th©fQther of re9ording paddy, alj of a sudden/th| the cro-^bar and assouited his- fath^ from the.above facts It is estabiish^ aii of a ^udden without any .pre-me- ^hen both fath-er $& son were dlsci that the accysed the Hoi^ever, can be inferr manner in the accused QSSQUJ hwin9 knowiedge thot by assau!tin9 <hi^f<?641<rf^woT^fl^<-51 ^Rit^K ^srf^rsff^^T Deo iearned Additiondi Pubiic P?'iosecutor ;ourt, rguments Qdvonced by learned counsei for. svidence.- Gherki Bai (PW"8) i^ho [mination has stated that ot the time'of mckled ^ith jron chdn. PradhQn Ram ff>W- m his evidence that the accused icnt I^QS bein9 given to' him ond treatment lent and thereofter, he became ol! right. )ve, it is estabiished that the accused ^as legs shockled by iron chain. A.t the ie accused and the accused were taiking ^ went inside the house, picked up |r the croi^bar6, In the cjrcumstanccs, l.d thot the the iitotion.and pre-pion, in Q heot of passion, i|sing something. 'Hence/it cannot be heid mth the intention to cause his deo'tk ^d from the circumstances, becQuse the |ed the d-ece^cd with the cro^bor, he ^as frhe vifjth the cro^bar on his XI-HC-78 ^S^^Wi^-n, W^W^Q, lci^my . A. fo^-- s • aY^ iT. a B •'•'«•BB •••«-• • rt'B^ • •d • ^ - •• • @ W^^T q^F (<|cit^q<g) ^^i^rf^jN? ^CT^STSRW 1 . Soma I^TSiR^??3ff^1T ^ he, is .likeiy to his-deatk Tli not trave! beyond Section 304 Port- In the resuit, the i^ awarded Sectjon 302 of thel a&cused is convicted far comniissiorl the IP.C. ond sentenced to undergo in detention since 1992 thereb €hM?^^^H^T^"l^!CQ"^fa^ca^ ^3rf^=T3T?^tT prefore, offence 'against the accused 1:1 of theLP.C. partty alb^ed. Comiction and sentence IP.C. ar©set aside, instead thereof the of offence under Section 304 Part-II of mprisonment for tenyears. ,Tne accused is h© aiready served out the sentence^ Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge He be set at iiberty forthwith unie|ss required to be detained in any other case. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge •^ ^ s: