IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17443 of 2009 NANHAY YADAV SON OF CHITTLOO YADAV, R/O- VILALGE NIMA, P.S.- GOH, DISTT- AURANGABAD. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAM AUTAR YADAV 3. ISHWAR DAYAL YADAV BOTH SONS OF LATE SAHDEO YADAV. 4. RADHIKA DEVI, W/O- RAM AWATAR YADAV 5. RAJMUNI DEVI, W/O- ISHWAR DAYAL YADAV O.P. NOS. 2 TO 5 ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE NIMA, P.S.- GOH, DISTT- AURANGABAD. 6. RAM PRASIDH YADAV 7. RAM DAYAL YADAV BOTH RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE PATHAK BIGHA, P.S.- PAUTHU, DISTT- AURANGABAD. ---------- 2 28.02.2011 While assailing the order granting anticipatory bail, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant submits that there is/are certain observation in the order which may prejudice his case. This Court having regard to the said submission, while dismissing the application, clarifies that any observation made therein was for the purpose of disposal of the bail application. Those findings shall not prejudice the case of the prosecution. pkj (Kishore K. Mandal, J)