a a w W’HJ) @ C/fWaa / INTHEruGHCOURTOFCHHATnsGARHAT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH Writ petition (S) No.59)? /2oo7 PETITIONER Ashwani Kumar Patel, aged about 35 years, S/o Shri Chatur Singh Patel ikh J .. Assistant Teacher Govt. Higher Secondary School Katahardi, Block S 19 Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) g. s VERSUS/ RESPONDENTS : 1.v )‘¢~rsmla%_.h,,-c,c . , v State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Education Departmei’i‘t, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, District, Raipur (C.G.) / 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raigah District Raigarh, (C.G.) / 4. Block Education Officer, Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER. As mentioned in the Cause title. / " ma W W a” WWW {73-08-26‘19: Shri Anil Mourya, counself rthe petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel wyer for the State. At the outset counse! for the petitioner swbmm that he wants to withdraw this petition with ii to make representation to the authorityw concemed. He aiso seeks a 'rection to the concerned authotity for deciding the representation of the petitioner at an early date as according to him case of the petitioner is squa eiy covered with the order passed in wtit petition (S) No. 4248I2008. Counsei for the responden [State submits that at this stage he can not make any statement before t is Court whether case of the petitioner is covered with the order passed in forementioned‘ writ petition. However. he submits that if the petitioner m kes a representadon to the ooncemed respondent, the same shaii be d ided strictly in accordance with iaw. Accordingiy, the petition i dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. if the petitioner ma es a representation to the concemed respondent within a period of two onths from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same is expected t be decided within a further period of four months from the date of its receip . it is made clear that this urt has not commented on the merits of the case and the authorities are free to decide the representation of the petitioner strictiy in accordance w' law. a a f—w‘ Hr a 3di— i Pritinker Diwakei Judge y