1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6456/2010. (Ganpatrao Gavli and Anr. Vs.Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.SP Katneshwarkar, Adv. for petitioners; Mr.SH Joshi, ADv. for Respondents. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 25 th October, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) In RCS No.157/2009 below Exhibit-28, an application for appointment of Court Commissioner was moved. The learned Judge rejected the same, now challenged in the writ. 3) After hearing both the learned counsel, it is explicit that erection/installation of the towers is completed. If location is changed, now by virtue of allowing the Court Commissioner, it cannot be altered. The details of laying the tower are also illustrated at page 70, annexed to the affidavit in reply. Though several other aspects are raised by the respondent in the writ about maintainability of the suit, competence 2 of defendant to be served, all these aspects are kept open. 4) The order under challenge does not call for any interference, W.P.dismissed. No costs 5) Ad interim relief vacated. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/