1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 3132 of 2009 Jagdish v. State of Maharashtra -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr R.M. Daga, Advocate for applicant Mr D.P. Thakare, APP for State Coram: A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 2nd September 2009 1. Applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No. 09/2009 registered with Police Station, Warud under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Learned counsel for applicant submits that applicant has been involved on the basis of hear-say evidence in the form of alleged eye witness. Moreover, no active role has been attributed to the applicant. Learned APP submits that charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter. He, however, submits that till date applicant is absconding. Mr Daga denies this statement, but undertakes that even though charge-sheet is filed and still Investigating Officer requires applicant to be interrogated, he is ready for the same. 3. In view of what has been stated above, anticipatory bail deserves to be granted to the applicant. In the event of his arrest in Crime No. 09/2009 registered with Police Station, Warud, District Amravati for 2 an offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, applicant be released on anticipatory bail upon his executing PR Bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount. Applicant shall attend Investigating Officer as and when required and shall not commit any crime while on bail. Applicant shall not tramper with prosecution evidence in any manner. He shall leave his permanent address along with telephone number/cell phone number, if any, with the Investigating Officer and shall communicate change, if any therein, in future. Application disposed of. Hamdast. Judge. hsj 3