HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P. No.16201 of 1998 18.6.2007 Between Dr.Rekha Pande ..Petitioner AND University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad represented by its Registrar and others ..Respondents :: JUDGMENT :: HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P. No.16201 of 1998 The grievance entertained by the writ petitioner is that inspite of her superior merit, she had been placed at serial No.2 in the merit order in the selection that was carried out for appointment to the post of Reader in History, while keeping the third respondent at serial No.1. The learned Standing Counsel representing the University has informed that shortly after the third respondent came to be appointed as Reader in History, the petitioner was also appointed as a Reader on 1.1.1999, and that he had in fact, resigned from the service of the University and left it. Therefore, the grievance of the writ petitioner does not survive for any further adjudication, as suggested by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, but however, without costs. _________________________________ NOOTY RAMA MOHANA RAO.J. 18.6.2007 psr