IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12214 of 2009 SHEO SHANKAR PRASAD Versus THE UNION BANK OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 4 3.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Bank. Though all kind of statements have been made in the writ application challenging the proceeding which has been initiated against the petitioner under SARFAESI Act. After action has been initiated against the petitioner under section 13(4) of the Act an underlying wish has been expressed by the petitioner to pay up the dues and settle the issue. In this regard certain payment has also been made, one of them of Rs. 60,000/- in terms of the direction or the order dated 17.9.2009 of the Court. The offer of the petitioner and for settlement of negotiated kind is before the Bank and not before the Court. In absence of any legal infirmities having been demonstrated the petitioner is relegated before the Bank to pursue his matter. If any reasonable kind of offer or firm commitment is made on behalf of the petitioner the Bank may consider it. This writ application is dismissed with the above observation. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)