1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3258 OF 2009 (Ramdas B. Kothe and others vs. State and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri A.S. Chandurkar, Advocate for petitioners. Shri A.S. Fulzele, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos. 1 and 3. Shri A.B. Patil, Advocate for respondent no.2. ------- CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE AND P.B.VARALE, JJ. DATED : JULY 14, 2010 Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already made representation dated 26/7/2009 (Annexure P-V) to the concerned Authority for redressal of their grievance and in view thereof, he does not press the petition and seeks direction to respondent no.1 to consider their representation whereby they have requested to change the location of the project. 2 The petition is disposed of as not pressed. It is open to the petitioners to pursue their representation. It is also open for the respondents to consider the representation and take a decision as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The petitioners are directed to produce copy of this order before the concerned Authority within two weeks from today. While passing this order, we shall not be understood to have issued any direction to the State Government or any Authority in respect of the representation that is already made by the petitioners. The concerned Authority may consider the same in accordance with law. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE khj