Criminal Misc.-M No. 25659 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 25659 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 1.9.2011 Amriti .. Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. B.S. Baath, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P. S. Bajwa, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there are no specific allegations against the petitioner in the FIR. She has been implicated in the case on the ground that money was handed over to Rajan Sharma and his family. The petitioner is a widowed mother of Rajan Sharma. The petitioner is not having cordial relations with Rajan Sharma. She being a widowed lady is living with her other son. She had even disinherited Rajan Sharma considering his conduct. Learned counsel for the State submitted that the petitioner has been named in the list of accused. In the FIR, it is mentioned that the money was handed over to Rajan Sharma and his family. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the allegations against the petitioner, a widowed lady, in my opinion, she is not required to be taken into custody for interrogation. Let the petitioner join investigation and appear before the Investigating Officer on 12.9.2011 at 10.00 A.M. In case of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Criminal Misc.-M No. 25659 of 2011 [2] Officer. She shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. She shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 1.9.2011 mk