016w” BEPO'BE HwwglgE‘-QGH COURT OF CHHMTmGg; AT Xxwg ma? pETITz01\J/‘iud:' RwL OF mg. " :L—‘l mjuman lslamimE‘éTntari, i Vii/hmugh :1 > é‘ pETlTiONER LERSUS Mob. Kasam, ESecret’ary, Anjuman Islamiya Calmiitee, Jama Masjid, bhamtari (Chhatti sgarh) \ — 1.“N.P wakf Board Bhopal, Near ‘rl'aj— UL. rvxasajgdf Bhopal(M.P) g Collector, Dhamtari, District‘ Dh amt &l‘i {Chhé‘tti 59 arh) 3. Haji Mohammed ‘rlai, Election Officer, {Jnjuman is]. amiya, Dham'tari, Disirict Dhamtari (Chhatti érh) < ARTICLE gE‘riTiON mama/226 0}? com'gIITUTION 01: INDXA €La§4§wgf pewti‘tion 5 x x & S a ....... £ “L . . mi: L gy BLAsg XLEC~22 wazmmau£§%¥g;%ama1 @ 3mm W P $mm¢1mm% ¥& %gR anwhna&m raju 1g/7/2oo2 Shri H.B. Agarwal, learned‘counsel for the petitionerx §hri l, Emma Dy.A.G. fogvrespondénts counsel for respondent no.1. Ashok Das Valshnav, srri Sangay Kumar Agarwe nos. 2 & 3. It ls stated by Shrl H E petltloner that the petltlone t e writ petition as the pray has become infructuous. Accordingly, the petitic infructuous. . Agarwal, counsel for the r would not like to proceed wltn er clalmed 1n thls petition Sd# P.C'Naik Judge n is disposed of as having become {6W