IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA,THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 68 of 2005 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 03/11/2004 in W.P.No. 7086 of 2000 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Atili Sundari Kumari, D/o.A.Eswara Rao, R/o.Ramalayam Street, Hanumanthwaka, Visakhapatnam. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The Andhra University, rep.by the Registrar, Visakhapatnam District. 2 The Vice Chancellor, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. 3 The Additional Controller of Exams, -I, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.N.GURU GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: DR.P.B.VIJAY KUMAR The Court made the following Oral Judgment: (per Sri Devinder Gupta, CJ) We see no ground to interfere with the order of the learned single judge, which takes notice of the fact that due to mistake on the part of the University that appellant/petitioner was permitted to appear for betterment examination of M.A. course. But, however, on 24.10.1998 already resolution has been passed by the Respondent-University to dispense with the practice of paper-wise betterment system and the system prevailing on 24.10.1998 is betterment examination in all the papers. In case, the contention of learned counsel for the appellant is accepted, the University will have to deviate from its resolution, which cannot be permitted. We see no force in the appeal. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _______________________ DEVINDER GUPTA, CJ Date: 4th February, 2005 _______________________ M. NARAYANA REDDY,J Pnb To 1 The Registrar, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam District. 2 The Vice Chancellor, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. 3 The Additional Controller of Exams, -I, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. 4. Two CD copies