IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 5th day of December, 2011 1st Bail Application No.1111 of 2011 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Rinku Sukhija S/o Anil Sukhija, R/o Jairam Ashram Bhimgoda, Haridwar District Haridwar. ………Applicant Versus tate of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party S Arising out of Case Crime No. 349 of 2011, Under Section 332, 353, 504, 506, 427 I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali Haridwar, District- aridwar. H Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, A.G.A., present for the State. Heard. Applicant Rinku Sukhija, who is in jail in connection with Crime No. 349 of 2011, relating to offences punishable under Section 332, 353, 504, 506, 427 of I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali Haridwar, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that complainant Police Constable, used to take meals in Hotel of 2 the complainant, without making payment thereof. On being not obliged, further quarrel took place. The applicant has no criminal history. Co-accused Pankaj Sukhija, has already been directed to be released on bail. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the State, and after going through the papers on record, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this court is of the view that applicant deserves bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Rinku Sukhija, be released on bail, on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 05.12.2011 JM