IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7366 of 2011 Date of Decision : 6.9.2011. S.L Sharma ……Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & anr. …..Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Tarlok Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R. K Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G with Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A. G. for respondents –State. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner was originally appointed under the first respondent. On secondment basis, he was sent to the 2nd respondent. While so, the first respondent passed an order for repatriation of the petitioner to the parent Department. Subsequently, it has been cancelled. But according to the petitioner and as per the record shown to us, the borrowing Department, namely, H.P Mid Himalayan Water Shed Development Project does not acquire the service of the petitioner on secondment basis. Therefore, the first respondent has to pass an order with regard to the petitioner, since the borrowing Department has expressed its unwillingness to continue the petitioner and necessarily the 2 petitioner can only serve under the first respondent. The petitioner may report before the first respondent on 8.9.2011 at 10.00 a.m. and the first respondent will pass appropriate orders thereafter. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Authenticated copy to the petitioner. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. September 6, 2011 (rana/priti)