IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH JUNE 2007 / 6TH ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 15669 of 2007(M) -------------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- LALITHAMBIKA, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (MALAYALAM), HAVING PERMANENT AT MADHAVASSERY MADOM, PADANILAM P.O., NOORANADU P.O., KAYAMKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD. 3. THE MANAGER, CA HIGH SCHOOL, AYYAKKAD, VADAKKANCHERI, PALAKKAD. 4. THE HEAD MASTER, C A HIGH SCHOOL, AYYAKKAD, VADAKKANCHERI, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE ABRAHAM GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 15669 of 2007(M) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: Ext.P1: True copy of the request dated 14.5.2007 submitted by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent. Ext.P2: True copy of the request dated 22.5.2007 submitted to the 3rd respondent. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: Ext.R3(a): True copy of resignation letter tendered by petitioner, dated 31.3.2007 // True copy // P.A. To Judge Jes A.K.BASHEER, J. --------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.15669 OF 2007 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of June, 2007 JUDGMENT In view of the intervening development, it is not necessary to deal with the rival contentions of the parties. 2. Petitioner had preferred this writ petition apprehending that the manager was not likely to allow her to continue in the school on the ground she had already tendered her resignation. According to the petitioner, she had withdrawn the resignation. But the manager insisted that the resignation had come into force. 3. Anyhow, the matter has been given a quietus by the manager. Learned counsel submits that the manager does not intend to forward the letter of resignation to the authority concerned. In other words, no further action on the letter of resignation is proposed to be taken by the manager. The letter will be treated as non est. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the manager that petitioner would be allowed to continue in the school. The above submissions are recorded. Writ petition is closed. A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE jes