IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH L.P.A. No. 338 of 2011 Date of Decision : February 28, 2011 Gurmandar Singh and others ….Appellants Versus Joginder Singh and others …. Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present : Mr. R.N. Raina, Advocate for the appellants. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The instant appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment dated 5.5.2010 disposing of the writ petition filed by the petitioner-respondent Nos. 1 to 3 with a direction that no promotion to the post of Tehsildar was to be made till the seniority list is finalised in terms of the order dated 13.1.2010 already passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.P.No.406 of 2010. Admittedly, the appellants were not a party to the aforesaid proceedings. They felt aggrieved by the direction issued by the learned Single Judge in orders dated 5.5.2010 and 13.1.2010. On the contrary, reliance has been place on the interlocutory order dated 15.2.2011 passed by another learned Single Judge restraining the official respondents from tampering with the seniority list as it existed on 15.2.2011. There is apparently a conflict between the view taken by the two learned Single Judges. 2. In view of the above, we find that the appellants should adopt the proper course to approach the learned Single Judge, who has passed the orders dated 13.1.2010 and 5.5.2010 and seek remedy before that Bench by brining on record all the facts which are pleaded before us. The appeal stands disposed of in the above terms. ( M.M. KUMAR ) JUDGE ( T.P.S. MANN ) February 28, 2011 JUDGE satish