1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO. 2144 OF 2009 1. Harishchandra Bhiva Pavshe 2. Ravindra Harishchandra Pavshe, .. Applicant Vs State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. R.D.Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. H.J.Dedhiya, APP, for the Respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 12/06/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned APP for the respondent. 2. The applicants are seeking bail in C.R.No.I-171 of 2008 of Shil-Dighar Police Station, District-Thane. The said crime has been registered against the applicants for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 302,307, 325, 324,323,504,506, 143,147,148,149,149 of IPC and sections 4, 27 of Arms Act and Section 37(1),135 of Bombay Police Act. 3. Mr Suryawanshi, learned counsel for the applicants, at the outset, prays for withdrawal of this application on behalf of T 2 applicant no.2-Ravindra Harishchandra Pavshe. The application filed by applicant no.2 is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. 3. Insofar as applicant no.1-Harishchandra Bhiva Pavshe is concerned, Mr Suryawanshi, invited my attention to the order dated 22.4.2009 passed in Criminal Application No.1212 of 2009 along with Criminal Application No.196 of 2009 in Criminal Application No.1212 of 2009 and submitted that the present applicant-Harishchandra Pavshe is entitled for bail on parity. He further submitted that there is absolutely no difference between the role attributed and allegedly played by the applicant- Harishchandra Pavshe and Dilip Pavshe. Dilip Pavshe has been granted bail vide order dated 22.4.2009 in the aforesaid criminal application no.1212 of 2009. Mr.Dedhiya, learned APP, after going through the order and the statements of witnesses fairly submitted that there is absolutely no difference between the role of Dilip Pawshe and the applicant Harischandra Pawshe. In the circumstances, I am inclined to release Harishchandra Pavshe on bail on parity. Hence, the following order. Applicant no.1-Harishchandra Bhiva Pavshe is directed to be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount, subject to 3 conditions that the applicant no.1 shall not enter village Babharli, within the jurisdiction of police station Shil-Dighar, for a period of three months from today and thereafter he shall report to the concerned police station on every Saturday between 10 and 11 am till conclusion of the trial. He shall keep informed his address to the concerned police station where he proposes to stay during the aforementioned period of three months and shall report to the nearest police station from the place of his residence on every Saturday between 10 and 11 am. While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. Application is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.) 4