IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.342 of 2009 BETWEEN The Special Deputy Collector, L.A.O, TGP, Podalakur at Nellore. ... PETITIONER AND Shaik Imambi. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner : GP FOR ARBITRATION Counsel for the Respondent: MR. P. VEERA REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: This revision is preferred by the State against the order of the executing Court – Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nellore dated 15.11.2008 in E.P.No.235 of 2007 arising out of L.A.O.P.No.26 of 2000. 2. The respondent/decree holder has filed the aforesaid EP claiming the balance of compensation amount remaining unpaid in terms of the judgment in LAOP, referred to above, which was further enhanced by this Court in A.S.No.1026 of 2001 to the extent of trees. The execution petition was accordingly filed claiming an amount of Rs.7,77,580/- together with subsequent interest at Rs.2,12,017/- at 15% per annum till the date of payment and in default, attach the amount lying in the name of Sub- Registrar, Nellore. The amount as ascertained above was ordered to be paid by the executing Court failing which further orders would be passed by the executing Court. Disputing the correctness of the said order, the present revision is filed. 3. When the revision was last heard, both the learned counsel represented that there is a further order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court enhancing the compensation and the said order in SLP (Civil) No.14294 of 2007 dated 02.02.2011 is now produced. 4. In view of the enhancement ordered therein the calculation with regard to the amount payable by the petitioner-State to the respondent necessarily undergoes a change and the said enhancement, as ordered, will form subject matter of the execution petition. Both the learned counsel agree that fresh calculations will have to be worked out and seek opportunity to file fresh calculation memos. 5. In view of the said subsequent event, therefore, the respondent herein is permitted to file a fresh execution petition duly supported by a memo of calculation based upon the orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, referred to above and if and when the said EP is filed, the petitioner-State shall have liberty to contest the same in accordance with law and the executing Court will, thereafter, pass appropriate orders in the said EP. The civil revision petition is accordingly disposed of with the above direction. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J April 8, 2011 DSK