IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 10TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 19TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 33009 of 2008(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- GOVINDARAJ.R, S/O. RAJU.P, AGBED 23 YEARS, AKAMPURATH HOUSE, KALATHIKUZHI, VAYANASALA, THENGODE POST, KAKKANADU. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.SUDHEER RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURM DISTRICT. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURM DISTRICT. BY SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.33009 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 10th November, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner, who is a student in Engineering Degree Course from a college affiliated to the University of Calicut, had written the IVth Semester Examination. Apparently, dissatisfied by the marks obtained in one paper, he had applied for revaluation. He is aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the IVth Semester Examination. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioner in relation to the IVth Semester Examination, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of W.P ( C) No.33009 of 2008 2 receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.33009 of 2008 3 W.P ( C) No.33009 of 2008 4 (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.33009 of 2008 5 W.P ( C) No.33009 of 2008 6 (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.33009 of 2008 7 W.P ( C) No.33009 of 2008 8