V- sy, Aged 40 years, W/o Shri Devendra Kaiit Chaubey, Assitant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Ranvirpur, District Kabirdhain (C.G.) 2 Sm.t. Shradha Sahu, (Before Maniage Ku. Shradha Heia.pushpa) Aged 37 Years, W/o Shri Tam.radhwaj Saliu, Assistaat Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Janter Distt. Rajnaadgaon (C.G.) 3 Sint. Baby Lata Simaakeraged 32 years Wife of Shri Dharm Shekhar, Assistant Teaclier, Govt. Prmiaiy School Bhottupar Khurd (Naya) District Rajnaadgaon (C.G.) 4 Siat. Naudita Shrivastava, Aged 42 years, W/o Shri Vivek Shrivastava, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Prayogik Prathamik Shala, Dongargaon Distt. Rajuaiidgaon (C.G.) 5 Sint, Pumima Shukla; Aged 36 years, W/o Shri Saileadra Kuaiar Shulda, Head-Mistress, Govt. Middle School, Chliilsle, Distt. Rajnaadgaos. (C.G.) 6 Smt. Kaati Thakur, Aged 42 Years, W/o Shri S.K. Tbakur, Assistant Teacher, Govt.. Middle School, Chliikle Distt. Rajnaudgaon (C.G.) Govermnent of Chhatdsgarh, Through: SecTetaiy, School Ediication Departinent, D.K.S. Bhawau, Raipiu-(C.G.) 2 The District Education Of5cer, Rajnandgaon (C.G.j 3 The District Education. Officer, Kabirdham (C.G.) Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Ajay D%dvedi, Panel Lawyer for tlie State oa advaiice copy. -^- W. P, (S)_No._5619/2007 Heard on adraission. LeaiTied couusel for the petitioners sutainits fhat the petitioners have passed B.Ed. examination on their own expenses, therefore, they are entitled to receive two advance ilicreuients accordiug to circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also submits fhat in niaiiy identical inatters, fhe petitions have been aUowed in terms of fhe order passed in tlie case of Ytishwant Kv.rn.ar BharaSww' Vs. Municiisal MPJR-CG 96}. He subiuits that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the said Judgiaeat. This legal position is not disputed by the learaed counsel for the State. However, he subinits fhat the order m.ay be passed in terms of the said judgment, but it shall be. subjected to verification regarding petitioners such quali&cation. Accordiiigly, fhis writ petition is aUowed iu terms of fhe order passed iii case of Yashwani. Kumar Bfin.radwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and caiother (Supra) subject to verification of tiae facts as to whefher the petitioners had acquired B.Ed. Exainiaation Certiiicates on fheir own expenses as per circulai-s dated 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999 Emd further whefher fhey have been paid tavo advance increiiieiits or not. The petition staads finally disposed of. No oider as to costs. —--——__, Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti-