wp2527.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2527 OF 2010 Vaishali d/o Sukhdeo Arjun ...PETITIONER. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra, and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.V.M. Humbe Advocate for Petitioner. Shri.S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 & 6. Shri.S.V. Mundhe Advocate for Respondent No.4. Shri.V.D. Salunke Advocate h/f. Shri. G.V. Mohekar Advocate for Respondent No.5. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATE : 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2011. SPEAKING TO MINUTES : 1. The motion is moved for speaking to minutes. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submitted that in the Order dated 7th September, 2011, inadvertently, instead of "respondent No.5", wp2527.10 2 "respondent No.4" is mentioned, in Para No.2 and 6. 2. In the order dated 7th September, 2011, in Para No.2 at line no.1 and line no.7 and in para no.6 at line no.2 instead of 'respondent No. 4', the same be read as 'respondent No.5'. 3. Shri. S.V. Mundhe learned counsel prays for correction of his name appearing in the clause of appearance and in Para 5 of the order dated 7th September, 2011. 4. The name of the counsel be read as "S.V. Mundhe" instead of "S.M. Mundhe", in the order dated 7th September, 2011. The motion for speaking to minutes is disposed of. [T.V. NALAWADE, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/SEPT11