1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6400 of 2011 Decided on: 17.8.2011 Urmila Devi .....Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others .....Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Surender Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayer: “That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to grant the same and similar relief as has been granted by this Hon'ble Court in C.W.P. (T) No. 1594/2008 titled as Man Singh Versus State and in the alternative, the respondents may kindly be directed to grant the work charged status to the petitioner on the basis of Hon'ble Apex Court judgment in case 2 titled as Mool Raj Upadhaya Vs. state of H.P. and Phool Maya Vs. State of H.P. by this Hon'ble Court.” 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the case is squarely covered by the decision of the Apex Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P., 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316. 3. Learned Additional Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioner submits that she would file an appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority, within a period of one month from today. It is always open for her to do so. Thereafter, the matter will be duly considered by the second respondent/competent authority in the light of the judgment, referred to above and appropriate action in accordance with law will be taken within another four months from the date of production of the representation alongwith a copy of this judgment and a copy of the judgment, referred to above, by the petitioner. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 17, 2011 (Justice Rajiv Sharma) ( sck/hl) Judge. 3