IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.821 of 2010 SUDIST KUMAR BAITHA SON OF LATE RAMBARAN BAITHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O. BHANDAR TOLA, P.S. DHAKA (PANCHPAKRI) DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, EAST CHAMPARAN, BIHAR. 4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST CHAMPARAN, MOTIHARI, PATNA 5. OFFICER IN CHARGE P.S. DHAKA (PANCHPAKRI), EAST CHAMPARAN. 6. SUNIL KUMAR JHA SON OF TRIYOGI NARAYAN JHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHANDAR, P.O. BHANDAR P.S. DHAKA (PANCHPAKRI) DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN. ----------- 02. 04.04.2011 Heard the parties. Submission of the petitioner in nutsell is to the effect that Dhaka (Panchpakri) P.S. Case No. 52 of 2002 registered on 26th of April 2002 for the alleged offences under Section 406, 420 of the Indian Penal Code is not being properly investigated by the respondent no. 5 who is ignoring the instruction of the respondent no. 4. No counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the state. Learned counsel for the State submits that the documents which have been annexed by the petitioner are very old documents. Considering the submission of the parties, it is directed that in case the investigation of the aforesaid case has not been completed as yet, the same may be completed without unnecessary delay. The writ application stands disposed of. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)