IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9872 of 2010 SRI PATI SINGH, son of Late Ram Dayal Singh, resident of Village Ishwarpura, P.S. Dinara, in the District of Rohtas. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Government of Bihar. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar. 3. The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Rohtas. 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Rohtas. 5. The District Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 30.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of January, 2006 as an Assistant Teacher from Primary School, Chauranti under Dabal Block in the District of Rohtas, although he has been paid his retiral dues, but the correct interest as applicable from time to time over the G.P.F. has not been paid. It is submitted that even the amount of G.P.F. does not appear to be correct since the junior to the petitioner, who also retired on the same date along with the petitioner, has received the higher amount. It is further submitted that the grievances of the petitioner have not been redressed despite representation, as contained in Annexure 1. Learned counsel for the State submits that the said representation (Annexure 1) does not disclose the full facts. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of pending grievances as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to 2 represent his grievances before the District Superintendent of Education, Rohtas (respondent no.4) with a copy to the District Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas (respondent no.5). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled at the earliest and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The petitioner may also be provided with the calculation chart. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)