IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1254 OF 1998. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1254 OF 1998. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1254 OF 1998. Pradeep Maruti Todankar. .. Appellant. versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and ors. .. Respondents. ... None for the appellant. CORAM : D.G. Karnik J. CORAM : D.G. Karnik J. CORAM : D.G. Karnik J. Date: 19th August 2006 Date: 19th August 2006 Date: 19th August 2006 P.C:- P.C:- P.C:- 1. On learned counsel for the appellant being appointed as the Hon’ble Judge of this court, notice was issued to the appellant. The appellant has not made any alternative arrangement nor is he present when the matter is called. Appeal is dismissed in default under Order 41, Rule 17 of Civil Procedure Code. (D.G. KARNIK, J.) (D.G. KARNIK, J.) (D.G. KARNIK, J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11512 OF 1998 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11512 OF 1998 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11512 OF 1998 IN IN IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO 1254 OF 1998. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO 1254 OF 1998. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO 1254 OF 1998. Pradeep Maruti Todankar. .. Appellant. versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and ors. .. Respondents. ... None for the appellant. CORAM : D.G. Karnik J. CORAM : D.G. Karnik J. CORAM : D.G. Karnik J. Date: 19th August 2006 Date: 19th August 2006 Date: 19th August 2006 P.C:- P.C:- P.C:- 1. In view of the dismissal the appeal does not survive and is disposed of. (D.G. KARNIK, J.) (D.G. KARNIK, J.) (D.G. KARNIK, J.)