1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.475/2008 (Raj. State Certified Seeds Producers Association Vs. State & Ors.) Date of order : 22.01.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. G.R. Goyal, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. By way of filing this second writ petition, the petitioner has sought same relief which was sought in the earlier writ petition, registered as SB Civil Writ Petition No.7891/2007 decided on 4.12.2007 whereby while withdrawing the earlier writ petition, it was prayed that a liberty may be granted to raise all his grounds regarding the validity of the impugned notices before the Seed Inspector, who has initiated the proceedings. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that after withdrawing the earlier writ petition, he has filed additional reply (Annexure-41) 2 to the notice sent to the petitioner. It is further contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that after filing the aforesaid reply, the authority concerned is not deciding the matter and taking action against the petitioner for filing challan. It appears from the notices given to the petitioner whereby an opportunity was given to the petitioner for availing opportunity to send samples for re-examination. According to the petitioner, there is no power left with the said authority under the Rules of 1968. When the petitioner has filed reply and additional reply to the notices, then it is expected from the authority concerned to first consider and decide the objections raised by the petitioner and then to proceed in the matter. In these circumstances, I deem it just and proper to direct the respondents to decide the objections raised by the petitioner in the reply according to law and then to proceed in the matter. With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun