1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1946 OF 2008 Rohit Singh Gill. ... ..... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors... ... ..... Respondents. Mr. Niranjan Mundargi for the Petitioner. Dr. F. R. Shaikh, APP for the State. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and A. A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATED : 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2008. P.C.: There is no relief claimed in the writ petition. It is misconceived. It is submitted in the writ petition that one Mr. Shetty, who according to the petitioner, has committed several offences and his life may be in danger and if something happens to him the petitioner may be in trouble as a suspect. Therefore, the police should take necessary action. 2. In this view of the matter, it is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the police should take suitable action against said Mr. Shetty. We do not know what suitable action the police should be directed 2 to take. This writ petition is, therefore, misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.)