IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 27TH JULY 2010 / 5TH SRAVANA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1508 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.7015/2009 Dated 24/03/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.V.SHAJI, S/O.VARKEY, AGED 43 YEARS, HSST (SOCIOLOGY), SNHSS NANKICITY, KANJIKUZHY P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. JAMES VARGHESE, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. CHITRA, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. ANILKUMAR, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITONER) REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM. 4. P.K.SREEKALA, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITONER) PRINCIPAL, SNHSS NANKICITY, KANJIKUZHY P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.MEERA FOR R1 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ----------------------------------------- Cont.Case (C)No.1508 of 2009 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of July, 2010 JUDGMENT Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits on instructions that the Government have issued G.O(MS) No.69/10/G.Edn. dated 28th April, 2010 directing that leave without allowances availed by Aided/Government School Teachers under the third proviso to Rule 33(b)(2) of Part I, KSR before 24.5.2005 will be reckoned for the purpose of grant of increments. In the light of the recent development, the learned Government Pleader submits that directions issued by this Court in Annexure I judgment will be implemented within two months from today. In such circumstances I close this Contempt Case recording the above undertaking. It will be open to the petitioner to move this Court afresh if within the said period of two months the direction issued in Annexure I judgment is not implemented. P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge. ahg.