1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 210 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5075 OF 2005 (Mohammad Ismail Mohd. Rafique .v. Dinkar Vinayakrao Dorlikar) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri A.A. Naik, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Nitin Vyawahare, Advocate for the respondent/applicant. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. 22ND MARCH, 2010. Heard. There is no dispute about the facts stated in the application about the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5075/2005 as well the order passed by the Apex Cort in Civil Appeal No. 7206/2009 arising out of SLP No. 1989/2007. The Apex Court was pleased to set aside the judgment of this Court and the matter was sent back for fresh decision in the light of the directions and observations of the Apex Court. By the said order, the directions were given that this Court, shall direct the Rent Controller, Nagpur to complete the proceedings for taking up the matter within three months from the date of supply of a copy of its order and this Court after receiving the records along with evidence and documents from the Rent Controller, Nagpur and the findings made thereon, shall decide the same finally within three months from the date of receipt of the records from the Rent Controller, Nagpur. In view of the above facts and for the reasons stated in the application, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause made in the application. It is submitted that during the pendency of the Letters Patent Appeal, the original landlord Dinkar expired on 19.04.2009. 2 Needless to mention that the parties will have to take necessary steps as provided under law. The matter be placed before the Court after the decision of the Rent Controller, Nagpur. Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE *rrg.