IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1506 of 2007 SANJIWAN PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 04. 19.09.2008 Petitioner has filed the present writ application for a direction upon the respondent Bihar State Electricity Board to regularize him on the post on the ground that similar persons if not juniors, have been regularized but he has been ignored. The petitioner was earlier reinstated after termination based on an award rendered against the order of termination. But his battle did not end with the first reference which was made against his termination. He approached the Labour Court with yet another reference No. 25/98. The claim of the petitioner was with regard to the regularization on the post of contingent workman. In terms of annexure-11 dated 15th July, 2006 the issue of regularization was gone into by the Labour Court which did not find any merit in the claim of the petitioner and no relief was extended to him. It is not disputed that no steps had been taken by the petitioner to challenge the award contained in annexure- 11 but the petitioner has decided to indulge in adventurism by filing a writ application now demanding the same kind of relief which the Labour Court refused to grant him. If only the case of the petitioner was not of a workman, the Court would have imposed exemplary cost for filing such - 2 - misplaced kind of writ application with the background facts in mind. The petitioner is only cautioned to be more careful in future. The writ application is dismissed. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)