:1: :1: :1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1121 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s Orders Orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.S.V.Sadavarte for the petitioners. Mr.Rahul S. Kate for respondent nos.1 to 3. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 20TH FEBRUARY,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. The orders under challenge are on the Application of the Respondent in a Civil suit. The Civil Suit was against the Petitioner seeking a restraint order against him from disturbing the physical possession of the Respondent-plaintiff in respect of the suit premises, also not, disrupting or disconnecting the electric supply thereof. 2. It appears that an Application for interim :2: :2: :2: injunction was filed in the subject suit apprehending that the electric supply would be disconnected. The physical possession has been protected, so also, it is directed that the petitioner should take steps to restore the electric supply. That order was passed on 6.12.2007 and is now confirmed in Misc.Civil Appeal no. 99 of 2007 by the Ad-Hoc District Judge-Karad. 3. After hearing both sides, I see no reason to interfere with these orders. More so, when they are at an inter-locutory stage. 4. Mr.Kate, appearing for the Respondent-Original plaintiff, upon instructions makes a statement that the Respondent-Plaintiff will bear all expenses and charges which are necessary for restoration of the electric supply to the premises. Further, he will pay the monthly bills in respect of the electric supply, provided all bills which are duly received by the petitioner-landlord are :3: :3: :3: forwarded to him. He makes a statement that within a period of 15 days from the date the landlord furnishes the bill, the Respondent would reimburse the landlord in terms thereof. Further, all reconnection charges also will be borne by the Respondent-original plaintiff. In such circumstances and when it is a settled principle that the possession cannot be disturbed, except, by due process of law, there is no reason to interfere with the inter-locutory order under challenge in this Writ petition. Petition is summarily dismissed. ********