HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No.30383 of 2011 Dated 16-11-2011 Between: Y.Krishna Reddy. …Petitioner. And: The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Central, CRPF, Ranga Reddy District and another. …Respondents. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No.30383 of 2011 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the inaction of the 1st respondent in not disposing the appeal filed by the petitioner on 27-10-2011 against the office order No.P.VIII-1/2009-90-EC-11, dated 07-05-2009 passed by the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice and consequently, direct the 1st respondent to reinstate the petitioner into duty by setting aside the order dated 07-05-2009 passed by the 1st respondent. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is as follows: He joined in the Central Reserve Police Force on 11-10-2001 and since then he has been discharging his duties without any complaint. While things stood thus, he received a message from his native place that his mother and father are serious and as such, he made a representation to the 2nd respondent for grant of leave and the 2nd respondent granted Earned Leave for 60 days from 28- 02-2008 to 27-04-2008. After he left to his native village from Jammu and Kashmir, as his father was not well, he could not report to his duties in time. When he telephoned to his office for his extension of leave for a further period of three months, they threatened him stating that the officials are proposing to take action against him. Thereafter, due to political rivalry in the village between his family and other villagers, he had to shift his family to Hyderabad. Recently, when he went to his native village, he came to notice that the present impugned order is passed. Subsequently, he did not receive any notice except the copy of impugned order. After settlement of their disputes in the village, he made an attempt to report for duty and in the meantime, he came to notice of the impugned order dated 7-5-2009 and as such, he could not report to duty. He filed appeal on 27-10-201 but no orders are passed. In this connection, he requested the 1st respondent to consider his appeal by setting aside the impugned order dated 7-5-2009. Heard the learned counsel and perused the material available on record. The main grievance of the petitioner is that since he received a message from his native place that his mother and father are serious, he made a representation to the 2nd respondent to grant Earned Leave for 60 days and that when he came to his village, his father was not well and as such, he could not report to his duties in time and thereafter, due to political rivalry in the village, he had to shift his family to Hyderabad and that subsequently, he did not receive any notice except the copy of impugned order. His further grievance is that after settlement of their disputes in the village, he came to know notice that the impugned order dated 7-5-2009 is passed and as such, he could not report to his duty and that even though he filed an appeal on 27-10-2001, no orders have been passed. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, I feel it just and proper to direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the appeal stated to have been filed by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ____________________ Justice G.CHANDRAIAH Dated 16-11-2011. Dvs HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No.30383 of 2011 Dated 16-11-2011