IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 7234 of 2009 Between: G. Sudhakar S/o. G. Issac R/o. H.No.14-15-20, Amar Nagar, Mangalhat, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary for Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad Police Commissionerate Office, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 3 The Asstant Commissioner of Police, Goshamahala Division, Hyderabad. 4 The Station House Officer, Mangalhat Police Station, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.3 in completing the investigation in Crime No.157/08 on the file of the Mangalhat Police Station, with in the stipulated period as discrimination, unjust, illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and also violation of Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondent No.3 who is the Investigating Officer, to complete the investigation in Crime No.157/08 pending on the file of the Mangalhat Police Station, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.D.RAJU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 7234 of 2009 Oral order: Aggrieved by the action of respondent No.3 in not completing the investigation in Crime No. 157 of 2008 on the file of Mangalhat Police Station, as illegal and arbitrary, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. Respondent No.3 filed counter stating that they have taken up the case for investigation, and during the course of investigation, no witness of Mangalhat area spoke about the occurrence of the alleged incident, and after investigation, the obtained legal opinion and obtained permission from the Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad, for referring the complaint of the petitioner as “false”. It is further stated that the address furnished by the petitioner is not genuine, and therefore, the notice was sent to the counsel for the petitioner. That they have filed final report in the Court of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad, vide S.R. No. 2856 of 2009, dated 18.04.2009. Since respondent No.3 has completed the investigation and filed final report as “false”, no further orders need be passed in the writ petition, and the same is accordingly closed. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 21st April, 2009 KSR