IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22088 of 2008 UPENDRA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5/ 19.09.2008 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. There is general allegation that the First Information Report named accused persons fired as a result of which three persons sustained injuries and one of them died. Submission is that the allegation against the petitioner is similar to that accused, who has granted bail. There are two types of record before me through one set, a number of accused persons have been refused bail and liberty has been granted to them that they may renew their prayer for bail after six months. This order has been passed on 24.04.2008. On the other hand there is a record in which one of the similarly situated accused has been granted bail in Cr. Misc. No. 20743 of 2008 vide order dated 03.07.2008. It appears that almost six months time has passed since the order refusing prayer for bail of the other accused persons has been passed. Another accused person has been granted bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Upendra Yadav is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 71 of - 2 - 2007 corresponding to G.R. No. 1475 of 2007. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)