1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C. A. A. NOS. 107 & 108 OF 2010 IN APPEAL AGAINST ORDER NO. 85 OF 2010 Karla Deosthan Karla Tah. Pusad Distt. Yavatmal & Ors. Vs. Satish Vasantrao Chiddarwar ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. N. S. Deshpande Adv for appellant. Mr. B. G. Kulkarni Adv for respondents. CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL J. DATED: 28 th JULY, 2010. Heard. By application No. 107 of 2010 the appellant has requested to allow to file documents on record. Barring one document the rest of the documents were in fact part of the original record. I do not see any prejudice will be caused to respondent if production is allowed. Accordingly application allowed. 2. By application no. 108 of 2010 the appellant has urged to carry necessary amendment in the memo of appeal since it revealed that few of the 2 defendants, left to be added as respondents in the A. O. Their names are disclosed in the application. Since it will be creating a technical hurdle for the parties litigating in A. O., the request to implead the respondent by carrying necessary amendment in the appeal memo is allowed. Both applications disposed of. After the amendment notice upon the newly added respondents returnable on 13th August 2010. Hamdast allowed. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant as well as Shri B. G. Kulkarni inform that the presence of newly added respondents though technically warranted, however orders will necessarily revolve upon the appellant and respondent no.1 in the appeal. Consequently both the sides have urged to keep the appeal for final hearing at the stage of admission. Consequently S. O. to 13th August 2010. Learned counsel for respondent no.1 adheres to earlier statement dated 12th July 2010. JUDGE svk 3