IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 597 OF 2007 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 597 OF 2007 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 597 OF 2007 State Bank of India ...Plaintiff vs. Julie Appoline Mathias ...Defendant Mr.Ranjit Manjrekar i/b. M/s.H & M Legal Associates for the Plaintiff. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : AUGUST 30, 2008 DATED : AUGUST 30, 2008 DATED : AUGUST 30, 2008 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. The plaintiff has filed affidavit of service dated 1st June, 2007. Inspite of service, none appears on behalf of the defendant. 2. The plaintiff has filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of CPC, 1908. Since the defendant has not filed appearance within 10 days from service of writ of summons, the plaintiff is entitled for a judgment and decree in view of the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 3(6)(a) of the CPC. The plaintiff has filed affidavit of evidence and compilation of original documents. Judgment and decree is passed in terms of para 16(a) to the plaint. 3. Suit is decreed with costs. Suit, accordingly, is disposed of. Refund of Court fees as per Rules is permitted. (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)