IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 10099 of 2010 Date of Decision: 27.5.2010 Rajiv Gupta ....Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Raj Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release to him the consequential benefits in view of the order dated 30.9.2008 (Annexure P-3) passed by this Court in CWP No. 5650 of 2007, in pursuance of which he has been promoted as Clerk by the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has sent a legal notice dated 3.2.2010 (Annexure P-5) to respondent No.3 for the same relief as claimed in this writ petition but no action has been taken thereon so far and he shall feel satisfied if a direction is issued to him to decide the same in a given time frame. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the file, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to take a decision on the legal notice (Annexure P- 5) sent by the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order by passing a speaking order. May 27, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE