BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Third day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15257 of 2011 TAMBIDURAI ... PETITIONER / 6th ACCUSED Vs STAE REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLCIE PALANICHETTI PATTI POLICE, THENI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.409/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.JEYASINGH Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2.According to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the alleged occurrence is said to have taken place on 09.11.2011 at 6.45 p.m at Bodi and a sum of Rs.19,35,900 is said to have been robbed by some unknown persons and the petitioner has no role in the said occurrence. But however, the petitioner being the brother of A-1, the respondent police want to club the petitioner also in the occurrence and he has no previous case and no antecedents and hence, the petitioner may be granted anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that accused No.1 was involved in the said occurrence along with other accused persons and a sum of Rs.18,16,000 was recovered from him; A-2 was arrested and a sum of Rs.10,000/- was recovered from him. A-3 was arrested and a sum of Rs.10,000/- was recovered from him. A-4 was arrested and a sum of Rs.15,000/- was recovered from him. According to the confession given by the said accused, remaining amount are with A-5 and the petitioner/A-6 and therefore custodial interrogation may be necessary for the purpose of furthering the investigation. A-5 is still at large. Hence, this is not a case for grant of anticipatory bail. 4.Considering the submission made by both sides, the confession said to have been given by the accused has pointed against the petitioner/A-6 also. A-5 is also at large. Investigation is still pending. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.According to the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, there is a requirement of custodial interrogation and therefore, it is not a case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. sd/- 23/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 2 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLCIE PALANICHETTI PATTI POLICE, THENI DISTRICT ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15257 of 2011 Date :23/11/2011 SMA/28.11.2011/3C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/