,!M:!llt '-?' 3 - •1 BES'OBE THE M.P. STATE A01INISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JABALPUR . ffi&.l6 ^^33 Of 2000 Applicant Bespondeats » O.A.No. Versus 3. Snt. Veena Pani Mahant W/o Shri Bama Nath Mahant Santhosi Wa.tQ, Jagdelpui. S-tate of H.P. through s Secretaiy FoEest Depaitinent Mantralaya, BHOPAL / The Chief Gonservatoi of Forest Forest Deparnnent Jagdalpue Ciicle JAGDALPUR. The Dlvisional Fores-t Offieee Forest Department Cen-tral Bast.ar Torest Division JAGDSLPUR . Sbri.san'tosh Kumai gaxaf Lewei Division Clerk Mach Kete Bange C/o D.F.O. Central Bast.ar Eorest Division, JAGDAPGR. Applieat.ien under section 19 of tbe_ Adninistrative Tribunal•s Act. ^'^^^'S-^^T^^S^^^^^^Ci^Si^^&T-^ m\ Esi'i'anis HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTM, J. WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.2093 OF 2005 Petitioner Smt. Veena Pani Mahant versus Respondents State ofM.P. and others liiil Present : Mr. Prafall Bharat, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for respondents No.l to3. None appears for respondent No.4. ORDER (Passed on 1st ofSeptember, 2006) The petitioner was appointed on daily wages in the establishment of the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Department, Central Bastar Forest Division, Jagdalpur on 21-9-1984. The petitioner has filed this petition for regularization ofhis services. 2. Be that as it may, the appointmeut of the petitioner is aot as per the constitutional scheme nor in accordance with law. Thus, in the light ofthe decision ofthe Supreme Court in Secretary, EIIB IIIISlSltt-y State ofKanwtaka and others vs. Umadevi (3) cmd other^ and in Mifieral Exploration Corporation Employees Union vs. Mineral Exploration Corporation Limited cmd anothei^, the petitioner has no right to regularization ofher services. 3. However, in the facts ofthe case, the respondents may consider the case of the petitioner as per direction of the Supreme Court observed in para 53 in the case of Secretary, State of Kamataka and others (Supra). 4. For the reasons aboye-stated, tfais petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge (2006)45cci JT2006(7)SC151 Gopgl