IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10968 of 2010 DEVENDRA CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 11.3.2011 The boggy raised by the petitioner that he was a better qualified candidate and that he belongs to the district which enables him to right of appointment under the respondents as Hindi teacher, does not seem to be borne out from annexure-3 because the private respondent no.4 has B.A. & B. Ed. degrees from Patna University and petitioner is a graduate of Mithia University and so called B. Ed. degree from Hindi Sahitya Samelan Allahabad. There is a big question mark on such degree of Allahabad which has emerged from various adjudications of the Court. Since there is no absolute bar in the advertisement to appoint a person of adjoining district, in absence of suitable candidate from the district the fact emerging from annexure-3 speaks for itself. Obviously private respondent no.4 has a more cogent or valid degree than the petitioner and that is the reason she has been appointed and the petitioner has been kept in waiting list. No interference is warranted with the order impugned which in any way is a contractual appointment. This writ application has no merit and it is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)