^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^_^ Sinale Bench : Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh. J. Appellants (Defendants No.2 & 31 Respondents (Plaintifn Defendant No.1 S.A.No.06of2008 1. Radhe Shyam S/o Bali Ram aged about 38 years, R/o Gram Lakhanpur, Tahsil Charama, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) 2. Jhuna Bai, Widow of Late Shri Prabhu Ram aged about 54 years, R/o village : Lakbanpur, Tahsil Charama, Distt. Bastar C.G. versus 1. Mantora Bai, W/o Sundar Lal aged about 50 years, R/o Anjani, Tahsil Kanker, District Bastar (C.G.) 2. Bhuri Bai, W/o Bali Ram, aged about 52 years, R/o Village Lakhanpur, Tahsil Charama, District Bastar (C.G.) Memorandum ofAppeal underSection 100 readwith Order41, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Present : Shri Anil Pandey, counsel for the appellants. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 21st ofJanuary, 2008) Heard on I.A.No.01/2008 for condonation of delay of 2285 days in filing the Second Appeal. 2. This appeal is by the appellants/defendants against the concurrent finding recorded by both th^ Courts below. It js not disputed that the appetlants/defendants were represented by tb6 counsel in both the Courts below. The contention that the appellants for the first time came to know about the decree having been passed against them by the lower appellate Court on 04.08.2007 when they contacted their counsel in another matter lo ^U- J3aS no ground forcondonation of/inordinate delay in filing ofthis appeal. 3. No sufficientground for condonation of delay is shown. I.A.No. 01/2008 for condonation of delay stands dismissed and consequent thereto this appeal is also dismissed as barred by time. 4. I.A.No.02 for amendment stands disposed of. Sd/- umpna-s^5 tomu^1