Qmmw- o'P A (w /- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cl N0. S^f^^- /2010 WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF THE INDIA PETITIONER ) o .....••1 r^^.^^^~ '..••^^i/!'^\-'^""'\ ^w~:^^}^ssy""""' ,<ftS4^^^J^"'-"1" -...•a'ft39"' ie0- SlSW RESPONDBNTS Rajesh Kumar Shukla S/o. Late H.L. Shukla, aged about 38 years, R/o. Station Road Champa, Distt. Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Regional Transport Authority Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) ^l^ H10H COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR WRrTPETITIONrc) No. 2487 of2010 PETITIONER Rajesh Kumar Shukla. VER8US RE8PONDENT8 : Regional Transpoil; Authority, Bilaspur & another. WRIT PETITION L'NDER ARTICLE 226 OP THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA SB: Hes'ble Shri Satish K. 1,3. Present: Shri Anshul R. Shrivastava, Advocate tbr the petitiouer. Shri Shashank Thakur, Paae! Lawyer forthe State/respondents. QRDERIQRAD (Passed on 14th day of June, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing tbr the petitioner, on instnictions, subniits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits. However, he prays that the respondent authorities may be directed to eonsider and decide his pending representation dated 28.05-2009 (Annexure P/l) as expeditiouslv as oossible. 2. Shri Iliakur, leamed counsel appearing fbr the State/respondents subnats that if the above applicatian is still pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided in accordanee with law, within a period ofeight weeks from today. 3. Ia view ofthe tbregoina, aecording to leamed eounsd appearing tor tfae petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. 4. Accordinglv. the writ petttion is disposed of. ^ .. ,, »„.....,.»„„... -.^^- „. g^^ ^^ Agnihotri Aimt