IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35860 of 2009 RAM AYODHYA RAM Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 5/ 29.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Money was distributed by the Committee in which petitioner was also a member. Beneficiaries were farmers who were to be compensated for the loss sustained by the damage of their crops. A committee is also constituted which is working but rivalry group of Mukhiya is acting and filed this case. Some interested persons only appeared to state that they were given lesser amount or none but most of the beneficiaries independent are stating about receiving of the full amount. So, till result of the enquiry comes, petitioner’s arrest cannot be justified. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 51 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Motihari subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. However, the bail so granted to the petitioner shall be reconsidered/scrutinized again after submission of the report of the Committee. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)