IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26587 of 2010 BINOD KUMAR PAGALIYA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 05.8.2010. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Jakkanpur P.S.Case no.57 of 2007 for offence punishable under section 394 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of this petitioner has been involved in the present case by reason of the statement made by co-accused Sunil Kumar from whose house certain looted articles were recovered. Learned counsel submits that said Sunil Kumar has been granted bail by a bench of this Court vide order dated 23.5.2008 passed in Cr.Misc.No.19612 of 2008. It is stated that neither any looted article was recovered from the possession of the petitioner nor he was put on test identification parade and that he has remained in custody since 9.4.2010. Considering the circumstances and the submissions of the learned counsel, let the 2 petitioner Binod Kumar Pagaliya be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Jakkanpur P.S.Case No.57 of 2007, subject to the condition that the father of the petitioner would stand as one of the bailors and who shall be under a duty to inform the court below in case this petitioner after his release in the present case is named or is involved in any further case of similar nature and whereupon the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner on grounds of misuse. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)