1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8461 OF 2006 Dashrath Keshav Shirsekar ..Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors ..Respondents Mr.S.K.Mali, advocate, for petitioner Mr.S.M.Kazi, advocate, for respondent No.3 CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 12TH MARCH, 2008 P.C. . The petitioner and respondent Nos.2 to 8 have settled their dispute. The Minutes of Order are signed by both the parties so also their advocates. The petitioner is present in Court and has confirmed arrangement arrived at so also the receipt of the monies which are set out in Clause- I. He understood the implications of the acceptance of the pay order inasmuch as he gives up all right, title and interest in the permanent accomodation. He does not press for any reliefs now either in the Suit or in the Writ Petition. In the light of 2 consent Minutes of Order, terms of which are arrived by both sides willingly and finalized, the same are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. Order in terms of the Minutes. Writ Petition disposed of. Civil Application, if any, does not survive and same is disposed of. No costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)