IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.308 of 2007 MANISHA RANI DAS @ ORS Versus DICKSON @ DICSON SINGH ----------- 7. 18.12.2008 In the memo of appeal the valuation of this appeal has been mentioned as Rs.200000/-. In the counter affidavit dated 29.9.2008 as filed on behalf of the defendant/respondent No.1 and 2 it was mentioned that the value of the suit as mentioned in the plaint before the trial court under T.S. No.41 of 2007 was Rs.100000/-. In response to that assertions of the defendant/respondent No.1 and 2 in the said counter affidavit, the appellant files his supplementary affidavit wherein it is specifically mentioned that the value of the suit was Rs.100000/- only but due to typing error the value has been mistakably mentioned as Rs.200000/- in the memo of appeal. Since the value of this appeal is below Rs.200000/- it requires to be heard by the learned District Judge concerned. In such view of the matters, this appeal is ordered to be returned to the District Judge, Saharsha, the concerned District Judge who will hear this appeal as well as interlocutory application No.5618 of 2007. Let the record of this appeal be sent to the concerned District Judge for disposal of this appeal. Ravi/- (C.M. Prasad, J.)