WP(C) 6512/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B. K.SHARMA Heard Mr N Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr MR Pathak, le arned Standing Counsel for the education department. As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for disposal at the motion stage itself. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case of the rival pa rties, I dispose of this writ petition providing that the respondents may examin e the cased of the petitioner in terms of the guidelines formulated in Achyut Ra njan Das vs. State of Assam and others, reported in 2006 (4) GLT 674, and the ju dgment dated 2.7.2010 passed in a batch of writ petitions, the lead case being W P(C) no.2620/ 2009 (Faziron Nessa vs. State of Assam and others). Needless to sa y, the petitioner cannot claim consideration of his case against any particular post or service, and the consideration will be strictly as per the parameters an d yardsticks laid down in the guidelines. The writ petition stands disposed of.