IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24223 of 2008 ------ INDRAJIT PRASAD & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.7.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Musrigharai P.S. Case No.103/2007 for the alleged offences registered under sections 363 and 304/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the son of the informant died due to the accidental fire and there was no intention or motive on the part of the petitioners. As a matter of fact, in the said accidental fire, the grandson of petitioner no.1 also sustained severe burn injuries. It is further submitted that deceased Ravi after 17 days of his treatment in the hospital died and the informant had no complain against the petitioners. It is only after three months of the death of Ravi, the informant after having given second thought of the matter lodged the 2 present case. Learned counsel further submits that realising the truthfulness of the matter the informant and the petitioners have settled the matter as per the compromise petition, as contained in Annexure 3. Considering the submissions, as noticed above, and on perusal of the allegations made in the F.I.R. and the other materials brought on record, it is directed that all the petitioners, namely, Indrajit Prasad, Bhola Prasad, Sujit Prasad, Mitthu Babu, Shiv Kumar Prasad and Sujita Kumari @ Doli Devi, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Musrigharari P.S. Case No.103/2007 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub- section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.) 3