IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.372 of 2008 1. Randhir Kumar, S/o Sri Rajendra Rai, resident of village- Gorigama, P.O. Mahua, District- Vaishali. 2. Satyendra Kumar, s/o Sri Rajendra Rai, resident of village Gorigama, P.O. Mahua Dist- Vaishali. ......Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Department of Human Resources Department, Bihar, Patna. 2. Dr. Pratima S.Verma, Collector, Vaishali (Hajipur). 3. Md. Nasim Ahmad, District Superintendent of Education, Vaishali (Hajipur). 4. Mr. Navin Kumar Singh, Block Development Officer, Mahua, Vaishali, Hajipur. 5. Mr. Ratnesh Prasad, Block Education Extension Officer, Mahua, Vaishali, Hajipur. 6. Sri Shiv Dani Mishra, Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj, Bishanpur Hareram, Mahua, Vaishali. 7. Sri Suresh Rajak, Panchayat Sewak, Gram Panchayat Raj, Bishanpur Mahua, Vaishali (Hajipur). 8. Rajesh Kumar Mishra, Village- Gargaul Paharpur, P.O. Gariaut District Vaishali. 9. Rabish Kumar, Village Alipur, P.O. Bakhari Sajain, P.O. Rajapakar, District- Vaishali. ... Opposite Parties. ----------- 02- 18.02.2010 Heard Dr. M.P. Shukla for the petitioners, and Mr. Nirmal Kumar, learned Government Pleader No.4. This application under section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act has been filed by the petitioner of C.W.J.C. No.6614 of 2007 (Randhir Kumar and another Vs. The State of Bihar and others), and allege non-implementation of the order dated 1.8.2007 (Annexure-1), whereby the writ petition was disposed of with the liberty to the petitioners to submit appropriate application(s) before the Collector of the district which, if filed within a period of four weeks from today, shall be disposed of on merits by a 2 reasoned order within a period of three months from the date of submission of the application. Learned counsel for the petitioners Submits that the order in question has been complied with and the representation of petitioner no.1 has been rejected. 2. In that view of the matter, as prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioners, he is permitted to withdraw the present application with the liberty to challenge it in accordance with law and before the appropriate forum for consideration of their grievances on merits. 3. This application is accordingly disposed of. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/