IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32582 of 2010 SRI ASHOK YADAV (MUKHIA) Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 4/ 14.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is Mukhiya of village Paura alleged for Rs. 3000/- from beneficiaries of Mukhiya Mantri Awas Yojana. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that earlier also for the same act, Gogri P.S. Case No. 10 of 2010 was filed in which petitioner has been allowed bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 7073 of 2010. Certainly, nature of allegation is same but grievance is different that of individual one Gita Devi and collectively of aggrieved who came forward to expose their grievances. Bail in earlier case was allowed due to non-corroboration. However, direction is there to reconsider the bail at the stage of hearing of the case on the point of charge. In the present case, several aggrieved persons appeared and corroborated their allegation about receiving from them Rs. 3000/-. In such circumstance, in earlier case if some of them sworn affidavit about giving no bribe is of no consequence to favour the petitioner. Above discussed allegation does not justify the petitioner for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)