fS""\. -^^^ —78 ^ ^H^I'^T'^NF ^^T ^in^i ^rpN? '^ •3-wcspn^p^ ^ifl^^Ko, fsK'D-Hy *<(*R1l^PCT^ •^I.ZOQ 3;?!^??T?^ ( ^ij^^l) TF^T^^f^SIT^I W^pfr^ WT^ "^f "fe^ Tt^^R iF3t^H^T^r (Single Bench; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhirendra Mishra) W.P. PETITIONER (Petition U/A 2 Ajit Bhitgh^ra RESPQNDENTS t6 of Constitution of India) Kufnar Lakra, son of Late Rainu Lakra, aged about >, Ex. Service Man, residence ofTukutola, Post- Tahsil-Bagicha, District Jashpur, jsgarh. 6. D| Present: Mr. K.N. Nande, Advocate forthej Mr. R.S. Baghel, Central Govt. St^nding s) No.472/2009 jiion of India, Through Secretary, Department of fcme Affairs. New Delhi. rector, Central Reserve Po!sce Force, Lodhi |)ad, New Delhi. )lice Superintendent, Special Sector, Head Qljarter, New Delhi, C.R.P.F. New Delhi. 4. P<|)lice Deputy Superintendent, Mahanideshalaya, C|R.P.F, Block-1, C.G.O. Complex, Lodhi Road, Nfew Delhi. 5. Cpmmandant 173 Batalian, C.R.P.F., N^rsinghg^rh, Agartala, (Tripura West) 5P, CRPF, Raipur. (Chhattisgarh) petitioner. Counsel for the respondents, 27.1.2009 Heard. The petitioner has filed the instant petition for a direction to the respondents for quashing the orjjer of Annexure P-1 whereby the petitioner has been invalidated from the serjvice on medical ground. Learned counsel for th^ petitioner submits that immediately after receipt of the notice regarding medical ground (Annexure P-2), respondent No.5 vide Annexure invalidation of petitioner's service on the Ithe petitioner submitted his reply before the P-3 & P-4, however, the petitioner's services have been invalidated vide ord^r of Annexure P-1 without considering the reply to the notice. The petitionerjfited representation beforb respondent No.2- ^ XI-HC—7» -3~aE{ ^TFTRW, ^tll^4)^ fo<ril<l^< Nii^tr st»Ni^» '•^200 ^TT^r^FI^WF ^^ ^tCi^i ^*ii<s^ ^i^r T?^ (^t3^^) i^rrw^fi^^T^ 2^ ^NfeN^ WR^F ^ f^S "(^$R ^^Ra??^r Director, CRPF against his invalicgation and the respondent No.2 vide memo dated 6.10.2008 (Annexure P-5) C.R.P.F., Special Sector, CRPF, report. He further submits that h^ is not pressing this petition at this stage, however, he prays for a liberty toi No.2 shall consider and decide months from the date of receipt of| Certified copy as per rules.i directed the Inspector General of Police, Delhi to conduct enquiry and submit his file fresh representation before respondent No.2 herein against his invalidatiojn from service and in turn, respondent No.2 be directed to consider and decpde his representation within the specified period. Learned counsel appearin^ for the respondents submits that in case the petitioner files fresh represent| shall be considered and decided \& of receipt of the representation. In view of the above submj instant petition is disposed of wil representation before respondent| with this petition and certified cop^ ition before the respondent No.2, the same /ithin a period of two months' from the date [ssion of tearned counsel for the parties, the |h liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh •No.2-Director, C.R.P.F., New Delhi, along ofthis order, for redressal of his grievances raised in this petition. On such r^presentation being made, the respondent :he representation within a period of two he representation. ___———— Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge