IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12766 of 2009 MD.GAUS, S/o Late Md. Umar, resident of Village Medani Chauki, P.S. Suryagadha, District Lakhisarai. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Chairman, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Birchand Patel Path, Patna, Bihar. 3. The Administrator, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Birchand Patel Path, Patna, Bihar. 4. The Chief of Operation-in-Charge Audit, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Birchand Patel Path, Patna, Bihar. 5. The Chief Accounts Officer, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Birchand Patel Path, Patna, Bihar. 6. The Divisional Manager, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Divisional Office Near Tilka Manjhi, Bhagalpur. 7. The Depo Superintendent, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Munger. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 18.9.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-Corporation. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Corporation is proposing to recover a sum of Rs.1,31,343.75 from his retiral dues, vide communication contained in Memo No.2527 dated 2nd June, 2008, which finds reference in the representation of the petitioner dated 20th of January, 2009, as contained in Annexure 3. It is submitted that the said representation has not been considered since the petitioner has not received any communication in this regard. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Corporation submits that in case the petitioner files a fresh representation stating the details of his grievances, the same would be 2 considered as per law. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the aforesaid grievances as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Administrator, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Patna (respondent no.3). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the grievances as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the respondent no.3 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose of the same by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner could be redressed without delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)