IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO. 1959 of 2009 Between: Manchikatla Prabhakar S/o. Laxmirajam R/o. H.No.2-10-288, Jyothinagar, Karimnagar. ..... PETITIONER A N D 1) The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary to the Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2) The Director General of Police, Hyderabad. 3) The Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar. 4) The Circle Inspector of Police, Karimnagar Town, Karimnagar. 5) Ganapathi Jadav, Circle Inspector of Police, Karimnagar Town, Karimnagar. 6) Maheshwaram Laxmanachari S/o. Agaiah R/o. Plot No.215, Road No.6, Shathavahana Nagar, L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad. 7) Nuguru Raghunandan S/o. Papaiah R/o. H.No.3-7-809, Bank Colony, Opp: SRR Degree College, Karimnagar. 8) A. Shivaleela W/o. Varaprasad, R/o. H.No.3-3-184/32/A, Koti Complex, Peddapally proper and Mandal, Karimnagar District 9) B. Sridhar Reddy S/o. Dharma Reddy R/o. H.No.6-149, Durga Bhavani Nagar, Opp: Santhoshnagar Colony, Saidabad, Hyderabad. 10) V. Bhoopal Reddy S/o. Late Venkat Reddy R/o. H.No.3-2-118/N, Vijaya Sree Apartments, Ganeshnagar, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad. 11) A. Ramesh Kumar S/o. Venkateshwarlu R/o. D.No.2-8-118, Vaddepally, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus of any other writ order or direction declaring the action of the respondents No.3, 4/5 in calling the petitioner to the police station and making to sit in the police station and threatening and harassing to settle the accounts of the FIRM named SAI VAMSHI CONSTRUCTIONS, under the influence of the respondents No.6 to 11, is nothing but abusing the powers vested in them and the same is illegal, nul and void and also violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also violative of principles of natural justice. Consequently direct the respondents No.3, 4 / 5 not to call and not to harass and not to make sit the petitioner in the police station for settling the accounts of the FIRM named SAI VAMSHI CONSTRUCTIONS. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.1959 of 2009 ORDER: The main grievance of the petitioner is that respondents 3 to 5, at the instance of respondents 6 to 11, are calling him and making him to sit in the police station as also threatening and harassing him to settle the accounts of the Firm named Sai Vamshi Constructions, under which the petitioner and respondents 6 to 11 were doing the partnership business dealing with the construction activities such as construction of multistoried buildings, flats, commercial and residential complexes and all types of civil constructions and development works. Respondent No.5, who is also shown as respondent No.4, filed a counter affidavit stating that he never called the petitioner to the police station, that he never threatened the petitioner to settle the accounts of the Firm and that he never interfered in the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondents 6 to 11. He further stated that the petitioner approached this Court only to prevent the police from taking any action against him in future, in case any complaint is lodged against him. Recording the aforesaid statement, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA,J 12.02.2009 v v