VKIMI AO MoiiflinsMoo ani io suasuav aaaNii Noiiuad idreaiN( .,^ Co'o) < indsB]ig 'jopsjjoo 'jssqsgBijiA '£ 4^e)^tKte{%- •jai38{ioQ usqt aip-ippuB-^i^s- {•O'O'jjndiB^ •BBAEqg-g-3-a <t&B{BJtCBH 'lusmyBdsQ Boi}EJ}sroimpv jEjsusQ 'qjESsiosqqo JO }BSmBi8AO{) 'AjBtSJSSS {EdUttUjI'IpSALl&Q fa3[UBjT "t "^s .^^y ^•° "-1, ^"?.'. ^ ".n.1rf. ...••••"^<^ €^:-^L<<^^1& -f";.Jl-^r-.^"5-f ,n!i ^l,o-.-'"' ,..••• ^^ siNaaNOdSM 3s^5s'i'?sSiE:i;-tej«y -:snsi&A:- ('o'o) jadsEisgi3U}si(j 'BteqqBJiiBqy-aopE^s saijod '.indiBq^Ej. IISI|EJ. 'uijcg isod 'iijOj- -SSB{(IA o/-g 'SJBSA ce'inoqB psgB 'pESEijI {lidOQ Uqg 0/g •JB3[BJISEA UIEAqSSljpE'g , •aaNoiJiiad 1^3Ucfs-l <>iijyffi ^"--u ~a «— frOOZ.' '•OM Mouuad ureaiM03 ^?rh,?^^-'r^Ter f^ '.T^m Ty^mftp jr^ T'wnQ'^ T?^?IT •'irijT ^TT 'ciiiaff'- iia AV aciiiiiiVh/iuiu .au iLuiiu^' n>^iti andi JM w le Sench ^ ^x^. IQ.1 Vs. Pankaj Dwivedi and Another. Shri indrasen Sahu, counsel for the petltione Shri V.R. Tiwari, counsei for the responds (Passed or, 27th February, 2Q07) Learned counsel appearing for ths petitioner submlts that he would not press the relief sought for in this contempt petition. (2) Taking note of the statement made by the learned counse! appearing for the petitioner, contempt petition is rejected as not Chief Justice