IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.2394 of 2009 Date of Decision: July 18, 2011 Karnail Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Ajay Kumar & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Atul Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. M.P.S. Mann, Advocate, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Sukhvinder Singh Nara, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent No.3. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition filed at the instance of the complainant challenges judgment dated 24.2.2009 vide which the private respondents have been acquitted of the charge under Sections 323, 427, 506, 34 IPC. 2. It is admitted that the complainant was not Crl. Revision No.2394 M- of 2009 [2] medico legally examined. Although it was the case of the prosecution that blood was oozing out of the wound, blood stained clothes were not taken into possession. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to show to this Court any reason to interfere in exercise of revisional jurisdiction. 4. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) July 18, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?