1 S.B. Arbitration Application No.1/2008 M/s. Goverdhan Ram Choudhary vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of order : 28.7.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. NA Rajpurohit, for the petitioner. Mr. KN Vyas ,for the respondents. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a clause of arbitration provided for settlement of dispute through arbitration but as per the said clause, which is in the form of condition no.23 in the contract between the parties, the petitioner was required to deposit certain amount for referring the matter to the Standing Committee for adjudication of the dispute. The petitioner challenged the said condition of pre-deposit under clause 23 by filing the writ petition. The petitioner's said writ petition has already been dismissed by this Court as per the learned counsel for the petitioner. In these facts and circumstances and particularly because of dismissal of petitioner's writ petition challenging the condition of pre-deposit under clause 23 now petitioner wants to avail the remedy under clause 23 by moving another application with the requisite fees under 2 clause 23. In view of the above request of learned counsel for the petitioner, this arbitration application is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy under clause 23. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/-