1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4673 OF 2009 Shirish Baburao Inamdar .. Petitioner Vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd .. Respondent Deepa Ahuja for the Petitioner CORAM : J.N. PATEL & MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE : 07th May, 2009 P.C.: 1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board. 2. Heard. 3. The petitioner has already acted on the part of the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal by making representation to the department against his transfer. In this event, it will not be proper for this Court to entertain the petition. 4. In so far as the learned counsel for the petitioner's prayer for maintaining status quo till their representation is decided is concerned, the same relief could have been sought from the Central Administrative Tribunal. As the Central Administrative Tribunal has not thought it fit to Rma WP1193009070509.sxw 2 grant any relief of staying the transfer order till said representation is decided, it will not be proper on our part to do so. With these observations, petition is dismissed. 5. At the oral request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the oder passed above is recalled. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to seek a review. Permitted to withdraw. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J) (J.N. PATEL, J) Rma WP1193009070509.sxw 3 Rma WP1193009070509.sxw