Crl. Revision No. 695 of 2000 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 695 of 2000 Date of decision: August 4, 2009 Tirath Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. GAREWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Kuldip Sanwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. K.S.GAREWAL, J. The learned Judge, Designated Court, Gurdaspur, had tried Amarjit Singh and Gurdip Singh for the murder of Shangara Singh on the basis of FIR 35 dated May 9, 1992 registered at Police Station Kahnuwan. The learned Trial Judge held that the prosecution has failed to prove charges against the accused and acquitted them on January 11, 2000. No leave to appeal was sought by the State. Criminal Revision 695 of 2000 has been filed by Tirath Singh to challenge the acquittal of Amarjit Singh and Gurdip Singh. Tirath Singh had also filed a Criminal Complaint against the four accused, namely, Gurcharan Singh, Malkiat Singh, Narinder Singh and Bakhtawar Singh which led to the their trial. The learned Sessions Judge Crl. Revision No. 695 of 2000 2 found the accused innocent and had acquitted them on January 11, 2000. Appeal against acquittal was filed by Tirath Singh which has also been dismissed today. As regards the above criminal revision, we find that there is no inherent perversity or gross illegality in the judgment of the learned Judge, Designated Court, Gurdaspur, which calls for revision. Furthermore, in the absence of any appeal being filed by the State, criminal revision by the complainant is not maintainable. Dismissed. (K.S. GAREWAL) JUDGE August 4, 2009 (NAWAB SINGH) prem JUDGE Note:- Whether refer to reporter No