IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.28496 OF 2008 SATYA NARAYAN PRASAD, SON OF LATE SHIV PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILALGE GULANI, POLICE STATION HILSA, DISTRICT NALANDA VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. AJAY KUMAR, SON OF RAM PRATAP SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DAYALPUR, POLICE STATION NAGRNAUSA, DISTRICT NALANDA ******* 2 21/06/2011 Heard Counsel for parties. The petitioner has filed this application challenging the order dated 12.05.2008 passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Hilsa, Nalanda in Criminal Revision No. 63 of 2006 by which the Court below has rejected the revision application of the petitioner, that the cognizance should also be taken against the accused/Opposite Party No. 2 Ajay Kumar. The case of the petitioner is that there was a demand of dowry for the purpose of performing the marriage of Ajay Kumar with the complainant’s daughter after Ajay Kumar qualified as a Veterinary Doctor. The Courts below have come to the conclusion that Ajay Kumar has not demanded the alleged dowry. In view of the concurrent findings of the Courts below, I do not think it appropriate to interfere with the impugned orders. This application is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )