IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42111 of 2009 SANJAY PANDIT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.12.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is brother-in –law and the submission on his behalf is that one of his brothers, Vijay Pandit, Bhaisur, has already been allowed anticipatory bail having similar allegation. But Vijay Pandit has been allowed anticipatory bail finding him to Chandigarh at the relevant time while the petitioner is said to be present in the matrimonial house when the death was caused for non-fulfilment of dowry demand with further allegation of causing of cruelty for its non- fulfillment within seven years of the marriage. Thus, I find it not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner. This petition is accordingly rejected. AnilKr.Sinha (Mandhata Singh, J.)