IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5928 of 2009 1. RAM BABU PRASAD son of Surendra Singh 2.Methur Singh @ Methu Singh @ Meghu Singh son of late Chhathu Bhagat both resident of village Khanajatpur, P.S.Meenapur, District Muzaffarpur Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.383 of 2009 RAVINDRA BHAGAT son of Gopal Bhagat Resident of village Ali Neura,P.S.Meenapur,District Muzaffarpur Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.10743 of 2009 LAXMAN BHAGAT son of Late Chhathu Bhagat Resident of village Khanejadpur,P.S.Meenapaur,Distrcit Muzaffarpur Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.14714 of 2009 RAM PRAVESH PRASAD @ RAM PRAVESH SAH son of Laxman Bhagat Resident of village Khanejadpur,P.S.Meenapur,District Muzaffarpur Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.4.2009. All the above four applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order because they have arisen out of one occurrence under sections 302, 307 and some other sections of the Indian Penal Code Informant’s brother Nand Kishore Bhagat had earlier kidnapped a girl Niva Kumari who happens to be the relative of the petitioners. It is alleged that on the date of occurrence, the petitioners and others were talking at a tea shop about taking revenge of kidnapping of the said girl. These culminated in assault. The informant’s elder brother Jai Kishun Bhagat sustained head injury. The accused persons also dragged informant’s younger brother Nand Kishore Bhagat who was later on found dead. - 2 - Submission is that though the petitioners are named in the first information report, they have been described as members of the mob. The allegation is general in nature. No specific allegation is attributed to any of the petitioners. At the time of argument, learned counsel for the petitioners produced a certified copy of first information report of Meenapur P.S.Case No.49 of 2008 under sections 364 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code in which deceased of this case Nand Kishore Bhagat was the prime accused and allegation of kidnapping of the girl is against him and others. Learned counsel appearing for the informant opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners of all the four applications are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, or court concerned in connection with Meenapur P.S.Case No.130 of 2008 so far as petitioners of Cr.Misc. No.5928 of 2009, Cr. Misc. No.383 of 2009 and Cr. Misc. No.10743 of 2009 are concerned and to the satisfaction of Sri J.M.Tripathy, Ist Class, Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur or court concerned in connection with Meenapur P.S.Case No.130 of 2008, Tr. No.3090 of 2009 so far as petitioner of Cr.Misc. No.14714 of 2009 is concerned. Md.S. (Shyam Kishore Sharma,J.) - 3 -