IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH JULY 2009 / 7TH SRAVANA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 4022 of 2009() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.198/09 OF MANNUTHY POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 AND 5 ----------------------------------------------- 1. VIJEESH @ KANNU, S/O.VIJAYAN, AGED 24 YEARS, MANNATH HOUSE, KOZHUKKULLY P.O., MOORKANIKKARA, THRISSUR. 2. SREERAG, S/O.MADHAVAN, AGED 23 YEARS, MANNATH HOUSE, KOZHUKKULLY P.O., MOORKANIKKARA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.DENIZEN KOMATH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANNUTHY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. --------------------------------------------- B.A.No.4022 of 2009 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of July, 2009 ORDER Bail Application No.2573 of 2009 filed by the petitioners was dismissed by the order dated 2nd June 2009 holding that in the nature of the offence and the allegations made against the petitioners, they are not entitled to get anticipatory bail. The subsequent application is filed alleging that there is change of circumstances. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the first petitioner was attacked by the defacto complainant in Crime No.198 of 2009 and others and he sustained very serious injuries. Crime No.321 of 2009 was registered against the assailants. That the first petitioner sustained injuries in a subsequent case is not a ground to grant anticipatory bail to him in respect of a case in which he is an accused. There is no change of circumstances warranting grant of anticipatory bail on the second application made by the petitioners. The Bail Application is accordingly dismissed. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE csl