IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2011 / 19TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26765 of 2011(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- DEEPAK.L, S/O.LOHITHAKSHAN AGED 26 YEARS, KEEZHEDATH HOUSE KAKKUR POST, NANMINDA VIA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.SHAMSEERA. C.ASHRAF RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY CALICUT UNIVERSTIIY PO, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,CALICUT UNIVERSITY PO, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 673 635. SC SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 26765 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBIT EXT.P1- A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 29.9.2011 (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).26765/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 11th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioner applied for revaluation of the failed answer scripts in the 6th semester B.Tech Supplementary Examination vide Ext.P1 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. 4.Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC Judge mrcs