IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 31ST OCTOBER 2011 / 9TH KARTHIKA 1933 RP.No. 780 of 2011(P) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.25945/2011 Dated 29/09/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ------------------------------------ 1. ANILKUMAR E.K., EDATHADAN HOUSE, ALOOR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. DENNY PAULSON, ARAKKAL HOUSE, CHELOOR, P.O.IRINJALAKUDA. 3. LINOY C.JOHNY, CHANDRAPONNY HOUSE, NEAR ST.ANTONY'S CHURCH, THRIKKAKARA P.O., KOCHI-21. 4. INDU K.B., KOUMPILLIKKUNNATH HOUSE, P.O.KUZHUR, THRISSUR. 5. ROSE BABU, PAINADATH HOUSE, VATTAPPARAMBU P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 6. ROSHAN JOSE, KATTLA HOUSE, TANA, MAIN ROAD, IRINJALAKUDA. BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, TENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, TENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ R.P. No.780 of 2011 IN W.P.(C) NO. 25945 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 31st day of October, 2011 O R D E R Heard both sides. 2. In this review petition, it is stated that, due to an inadvertent error, in the pleadings, it was stated that revaluation sought for was of 8th semester answer papers instead of 6th semester, and on this ground, judgment is sought to be reviewed. Having considered the rival submissions and being satisfied that there is a mistake in the judgment, review petition is allowed and the judgment in WP(C) No.25945 of 2011 is recalled. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp