ii@E^S='a%S'K=i?^g??S@*i£?^S6]S fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 2651 of2OT7 PETITIONER : Mai-kela B^caiya, S/o Shri Morka, Aged about 60 Years, Post-Teacher, Govemment Higli School Pamgal; Block Bhopalpatnam, District South Bastar Daiitewada, (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Ttu-ough : tiie Secretaty Sehool Education Department Ministiy, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The District Education Ofiicer, Dantewada, District South Bastar Daiitewada, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA S.B. : HON'BLEJUSTICESHmSATISHK.AGNIHOTRI Present: Shri Alok Dewangan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Law^'er for the State / respondents. 2. (Passcd on 2nd day ofMay, 2007) Leanied eomisel appearing for tlie petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that tiie fact aiid question of law involved in the present wi-it petition are tlie same to tiiat of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and anofcer {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has beeii disposed ofvide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appeanng for tlie respondents does not controveft the said submission. Accordingly, tlie writ petition is allowed in tenns of tfie order passed in the case ofYashwant Kuniar Bharadwaj Vs. Mmiicipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed. Examuiation Certificate on his own expenses as per the cireulars dated 24.12.1998 aiid 01.03.1999 aiid fai-llier whetlier he has beeii paid two advaiice mcrements or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge