^^ '^•-^•-f^.^" ?..••"" >..-^"",<>-fi\'^&:-" ^•-^!%^ ..B^.^-- IN TU'A-<_ ____-.___._..-_ COURT OF3UDICATURE AT CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRFT PETmON N0. /^^ /2006 :SEu©?; ISKsSfei {:u pEnnoNER ^- Versus RESPONDENTS 1) The Chhattisgarh Uniworth Operator Employees Union Through The Secretary Shyamu Ram Sen S/o A. Sen, Aged about 42 years, R/o Ramsagar Para, behind Sindhi School, Raipur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary Industrial Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Labor Commissioner (Registrar, Business and Trade) Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Labor Commissioner, Raipur (C.G.) The Uniworth India Limited, Sarora, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA 2) Sfl E1.1 III; -a^r, Respondents 'he Chhattisgarh Uniwort'n Operator Empioyees Union State of Chhattisaarh & others PETSTION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTiTUTION OF INDiA Present:- Shri Satish Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lavvye Shri Gautam Bhaduri, Advocate for She petitioner. fortheState. Advocats for the respondent No.4. (Passed on 22nd day ofJuiy, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in vievtf of the averments made in para 6 ofthe response dated 1/9/2009, fiied by the respondents No. 1 to 3, nothing sun/lves for adjudication as it is stated that the hoiding of eiection shail be initiated by the 5.2. isring for the respondents have no objection stands disposed of in vievv' of the above Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 2. The learned counsei appi and as such the petJtJor obser^ations. asho!<