THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARA CRIMINAL PETITION No.11109 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner is husband of the 1st respondent and father of the minor 2nd respondent. Both the Courts below concurrently held that the 1st respondent is entitled for maintenance of Rs.2,000/- per month and the 2nd respondent is entitled for maintenance of Rs.1,500/- per month from the petitioner. Relationship of the parties is admitted. Both the parties are living separately from each other. Contention of the petitioner that the 1st respondent left his company voluntarily, was disbelieved by both the Courts below after appreciation of oral evidence of both the parties. The petitioner is working as Government Teacher. It is alleged that he is also running Dish Antena and also giving private tuitions and getting Rs.10,000/- per month. The petitioner did not file any salary certificate. The Courts below took his monthly salary as Rs.12,000/-. The petitioner being a teacher, can be reasonably expected to have private tuitions also. It is contended by the petitioner’s counsel that the petitioner purchased land in the name of the 1st respondent. Ex.R1 is agreement and Ex.R2 is registered sale deed for the said property standing in the 1st respondent’s name. The property covered by Exs.R1 and A2 is only a house site. There is no income from that property. Therefore, the Courts below rightly came to the conclusion that the respondents 1 and 2 are unable to maintain themselves. Amount of maintenance granted to the respondents 1 and 2 works out at Rs.66/- and Rs.50/- per day respectively. It is very meager amount in these days. The petitioner can maintain himself and his aged mother with balance of his salary and income. 2. Second Revision Petition against revisional order of the Sessions Court does not lie to his Court. This Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is nothing but a back door method of approaching this Court questioning revisional order passed by the Sessions Court. There are no circumstances to interfere with the order of maintenance passed by the Courts below and also quantum of maintenance granted to the respondents 1 and 2. 3. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. ______________________________ JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU Dt:02.11.2011 ysk THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.11109 of 2009 Dt:02.11.2011 ysk