IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1742 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.11.2010 Swaran Singh ....Petitioner Versus Pawan Kumar and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. C.L. Pawar, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the decree-holder/petitioner states that decree-holder has wrongly moved an application for initiating contempt proceedings against the judgment-debtors instead he ought to have moved an execution application seeking possession after giving correct dates of dispossession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that present execution application may be allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh execution application. Present execution application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh execution application seeking issuance of the warrant of possession against the judgment-debtors. In the event of moving such an execution application, same shall be decided in accordance with law without being prejudiced from the order impugned dated 13.9.2008. (Alok Singh) Judge November 23, 2010 R.S.