IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3518 of 2011 MD. JABBAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 03.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The F.I.R. was lodged against Arsad Ali. The suspicion was raised against the petitioner in the background of the land dispute with the deceased that the petitioner was seen travelling on the motorcycle on the date of occurrence along with the F.I.R. named accused persons. It is submitted that there is no eye-witnesses to the occurrence and due to land dispute, the suspicion has been raised against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State submits that there is no eye-witness to the occurrence but the suspicion has been raised that the petitioner along with the F.I.R. named accused persons have killed the 2 deceased. Considering the suspicious nature of accusation, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 254/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner defaults for three consecutive occasions. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)