FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT : RAIGAD : RAIGAD : RAIGAD WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1522 OF 2005 PETITION NO.1522 OF 2005 PETITION NO.1522 OF 2005 --------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office ¦ Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, ¦ appearances, Court’s ¦ orders or directions ¦ & Registrar’s orders ¦ --------------------------------------------------------------- Ms Nayana Thatte for Petitioner. None for Respondent. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 28TH SEPTEMBER 2005 P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the record. The order of the Appeal Court shows that the Appeal Court has found that the name of the respondent - plaintiff was entered into revenue record as the person in possession of the land in the year 2000. The suit was filed in the year 1999 and the entry in the revenue record is made in regular course of business. Therefore, the Trial Court at the prima facie stage, relying on that entry, held that the plaintiff is in possession. In my opinion, it cannot be said that the Appeal Court has committed any apparent order of law. Petition is rejected. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Personal Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. ----------------