:1: :1: :1: HIGH HIGH HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIM. CRIM. CRIM. WRIT PETITION NO.2558 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.2558 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.2558 OF 2005 Vasparr Fischer Limited & Ors. ..Petitioner. Versus. Kaisoor Minoo Bhaya & Ors. ..Respondents. --- Smt. Shakuntala Joshi for the Petitioners. Shri.Sandeep Velkar for the respondent No. 1 Shri.Rajesh More A.P.P. for the Respondent - State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATE DATE DATE : DECEMBER 15, 2005. : DECEMBER 15, 2005. : DECEMBER 15, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. The grounds raised before this Court can be effectively answered by the Revisional Court. 2. As alternative efficacious remedy is available to the petitioners by way of revision before the Sessions Court in view of the decision of this Court in the case of V.K. Jain & Ors. vs. Pratap V. Padode V.K. Jain & Ors. vs. Pratap V. Padode V.K. Jain & Ors. vs. Pratap V. Padode reported in 2005 (3) Mh.L.J. 778, no interference is warranted. 3. These petitions are disposed of with liberty to take recourse to remedy of revision, if so advised. All questions are left open. :2: :2: :2: 4. The petitioners to file such Revision Application within four weeks from today. Till such time, no precipitative action be taken against the petitioners. Revision application, if filed within four weeks from today, be considered on its own merits in accordance with law. 5. In case, there is delay in filing Revision Application, Court will take into account the fact that the petitioners had first approached this Court, which period may be executed in computing delay. 6. Petitions disposed of on the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, (A.M.KHANWILKAR, (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.) J.) J.)