IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH & THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA FCA MP.239 of 2010 in FCA.82/2010 & F.C.A.Nos.82 & 83 of 2010 and Crl.RC.709/2010 FCAMP.239/2010 Between: Gudiguntla Vamsi Krishna ..... PETITIONER/APPELLANT AND Smt.Gudiguntla Vijaya Santhi .....RESPONDENT FCA.82/2010 Between: Gudiguntla Vamsi Krishna ..... PETITIONER/APPELLANT AND Smt.Gudiguntla Vijaya Santhi .....RESPONDENT FCA.83/2010 Between: Gudiguntla Vamsi Krishna ..... PETITIONER/APPELLANT AND Smt.Gudiguntla Vijaya Santhi .....RESPONDENT Crl.RC.709/2010 Between: Gudiguntla Vamsi Krishna ..... PETITIONER/APPELLANT AND Smt.Gudiguntla Vijaya Santhi and another .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA FCA MP.239 of 2010 in FCA.82/2010 & F.C.A.Nos.82 & 83 of 2010 and Crl.RC.709/2010 COMMON ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) FCAMP.239/2010 is filed to record compromise and dispose of the FCAs.82 & 83 of 2010 and Crl.RC.709/2009 in terms of Memorandum of Compromise. The petitioner/husband filed OP.585/2004 on the file of the Family Court-cum-IV Additional District & Sessions Court, Vijayawada under Sec.13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act seeking divorce against the respondent/wife on the ground of cruelty. The respondent/wife filed OP.723/2008 in the same Court under Sec.22 of Special Marriage Act for restoration of their marital life. She has also filed MC.22/2006 for maintenance. The OP filed by the husband was dismissed and the OP and MC filed by the wife were allowed by a common order dated 21.10.2009. Aggrieved by the same, the husband filed FCA.82/2010, FCA.83/2010 and Crl.RC.709/2010. In the application, it is stated that the marriage of the petitioner and respondent was performed on 05.08.2003 and after the marriage both of them lived together for some time and since 2004 they were living separately and therefore, both of them decided to obtain a decree of divorce by mutual consent. It is stated that they have no issues. They have also filed terms of compromise. It is stated that during pendency of these appeals, both the parties have entered into compromise at the instance of the elders and well-wishers, and accordingly the terms and conditions of compromise have been reduced into writing and both of them filed a Memorandum of Compromise to that effect. The terms of compromise are narrated at Paragraph-4(i) to (ix) of the Memorandum of Compromise. According to the said terms of compromise, the husband has agreed to pay a sum of Rs.12,00,000/- (Rupees twelve lakh only) to the wife towards full and final settlement, and husband has already paid cash of Rs.2,00,000/- to the wife and now paid Rs.10,00,000/- to the wife by way of two demand drafts Nos.917027 and 917028 dated 27.03.2010 drawn on Karur Vysya Bank, Nidadavolu. The respondent-wife has agreed to compromise the case in CC.535/2004 and DVC.No.30/2009 on the file of the II Addl.Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada and to see that both the cases are ended in dismissal. The respondent- wife has also agreed to waive her claim of maintenance in MC.22/2006, which is the subject matter of Crl.RC.709/2010. Both parties withdrew the allegations and counter allegations made against each other. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the compromise is recorded and FCAMP.239/2010 is allowed. Consequently, the FCA Nos.82 and 83 of 2010 and Crl.RC.709/2010 are disposed of in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise. No order as to costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J _____________________ B.N.RAO NALLA,J Dated: 19.04.2010 Dsr