IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P. (s) No. § 0 D1? OF 2011 ($3.1 ‘Shgk Banch Mls/iiip Kumar Mitra @ D.K. Mitra, S/o Late Shri S.K. Mitra, aged about 53 years, Inspector of Police, Presently posted as Town Inspector and Station House Officer at Police Station Dabhra, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), R/o Dabhra, Tahsil ‘Dabhra, District Janjgir~Champa (C.G.). PETITIONER :- VERSUS T :— 1./ State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary Home Department (Pollce Administration) Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. /,Director General of Police, State of Chhattisgarh, Police Headquarters, Raipur (C.G.). 33/ Police Establishment Board, Through Chairman, Police Headquarter, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1950 RESPONDENS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH_:BILASPUR 5“ WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 5049 OF 2011 PETITIONER Dilip Kumar Mitra @ D.K.Mitra Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Yashwant Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Dy. Advocate General for the State. ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 02” day of September, 201 1) '1 1. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 03.08.2011 (Annexure P—1), passed by the respondent No.2, whereby, the petitioner working as Station House Officer at Police Station Dabhra, District Janjgir~Champa, has been transferred to District Jagdalpur. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that being aggrieved, the petitioner preferred a representation dated 10.08.201 1 (Annexure P-9), which is pending consideration. 3. At this juncture, Shri Murthy, learned Dy. Advocate General x appearing for the State submits that the pending representation of the petitioner shall be considered and decided within a period of 14 days. He further submits that till disposal of the representation, the impugned order dated 03.08.2001 (Annexure P-1), in respect of the petitioner, shall not be given effect to, if the petitioner has already not tvk v been relieved. 4. In view of foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. ‘W‘K‘M/\ //d Sdl’ Ag‘“ 'hotr satish K Judge