IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36773 of 2009 SUJAY MANDAL, SON OF RAMDEO MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MAJHAULIA, P.S. BATHNAHA, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI………………………………………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR……………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : M/s. Kanhaiya Prasad Singh, Senior Advocate And Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, A.P.P. ---------- 3. 27.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 341, 324, 307 and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that it is highly improbable that in the night when the informant was sitting in his betel shop, he heard the sound of firing and saw the miscreants also running away and who had fired at the deceased. It has also been submitted that the entire occurrence and statement in the First Information Report itself create a doubt for the purpose of granting bail. Learned A.P.P. for the State submitted that there is 2 direct allegation against this petitioner of firing at the deceased and it has been stated in the F.I.R. that the informant had heard the scream of his father and identified him, who has stated that Sujay Mandal had fired upon him. In the aforesaid circumstances, since there is direct allegation against the petitioner of firing and killing the deceased, I am not inclined to grant bail to this petitioner. As a result, this application is dismissed. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)