ai HIGHCOURT OFCMHATTISGARHATBILAS1PUR DIVISIONBENCH CORAM: HON'BLESHRIRAJEEVGUPTA,C.J.& HON'BLESHRISUNILKUMARSINHA,J. ADpJicant Claimant Respondents JVICCNo. 446 of2006 Gangadas Man|kpuri, S/o Ma ohardas Manikpuri,Agecl|about42years,Assistani TeaGher, Prima^y Schooj, Purdai Tahsil Dhamda, Distt, Durg (C.G^ Versus 1 1. Narendra Kumar, S/o Ghhotelal, Presently RM ^ran Nagar, Durg <C.G.) Permanent addrfess - CM1 Lines, Raipur 2. Dinesh Chandra Agnihotri, S/o Sharda Prasad Agnihotn, R/o A-7, Ravi Nagar, Ratpur(C.G.) | 3. The Divisional Manager, The New India fnsurance Go. iLtd .F Parcha Bhavan, Durg(C.G.) ! ApDlication for Re^toration of IVEisceManeoys Abpeal No.840/2004.whichhasbeendismissee}on 1/11/2004 for want of prosecution. Present: ShrjP.R. Patankar,!earned counselforthe petitioner. 1 GRDER (15th September, 2008^ The fbHowJng order of the Cpurt was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. : Shri P.R. Patankar, learned counsel forjthe petitjoner is heard on IVI.C.P. No. ^l 496/2006, ^ petition for condonation of delayinfiiingth'erestoratiohpetition. i^^&a^^^V^^^i^^<;i^<^ « .:1.2-: :; -^ I'i.l 2) On due^consideration, v^ are satisfied th^ has $ycceeded in showing sufficient cause forthe delay in fiiing therestorationpetjtion. 3) M.C.P.No. 1496/2006, therefbre,isallow^^ infilingtherestoratjpnpetjtionisherebycondoned:^ 4) Learned counse! for the petitto the restoration petition. 1 5) The petitioner is seeking restoratlon of MA.N which was dismissed for want of prosecution ^ 01-11-2004.';-.::-; ^•';.'.'1::1^ 6) Qn due consideration of the submissions of ieamed cqunset forthe petitionerandthegrouridstakenintherestoratton petition, we are satisfied that the^^^^a appellant's counsei on 01-11-2004 when M.A.No.8'40/2004 was takenupforhearing,^^basedon&o^a^grounds. 7) M.G.C. No.446/2006, therefore No.840/2004 is resfored to its original number. subbu Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge