IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2010 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 36654 of 2010(F) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- E.L. JOSEPH, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O.LAINIS, RESIDING AT ELANJIKKAL HOUSE, PULLOOT VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT' BY ADV. SRI.R.O.MUHAMED SHEMEEM, SMT.NASEEHA BEEGUM P.S. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. CHAIRMAN, THE KERALA STATE HANDICAPPED PERSON WELFARE CORPORATION LIMITED, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 012 2. MANAGING DIRECTOR THE KERALA STATE HANDICAPPED PERSON WELFARE CORPORATION LIMITED, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 012 3. NASEERA, AGED 48 YEARS, W/O.AZEEZ, H.NO.6/828, KOCHAMPARAMBIL, MATTANCHERY VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 002 4. AZEEZ, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O.KUNJU MARAKKAR, H.N.6/828, KOCHAMPARAMBIL, MATTANCHERY VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682 002. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 36654 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 8th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that by Ext.P1, he purchased a property belonging to the 3rd respondent. It is stated that respondents 3 and 4, wife and husband had mortgaged the property to the 1st respondent and that a liability was incurred on the property. It is stated that, despite the above, suppressing the same, the property was sold to the petitioner. 2. Having come to know about the liability, petitioner approached the 1st respondent by filing Ext.P5 requesting for waiver of the interest accrued, so that he can discharge the balance liability. Orders have not been passed on Ext.P5. It is with the above grievance, the writ petition is filed. 3. Now that according to the petitioner, the aforesaid representation is pending before the 1st respondent, at this stage, all that is required is that the 1st respondent should consider the representation made by the petitioner. In that view of the matter, I dispose of this writ petition itself directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on WPC No. 36654/2010 :2 : Ext.P5. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp