^ z. c "r' ( IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. i^ /58t0- ^0\\ PETITIONER ;>.0^^ ';.••.'.,•'- .'f'*' ."Afc»1-- ,.''•*'' »** ^s^^ ....--•' Smt. Manisha Sharma W/o Shri S. K. Sharma, Aged about 43 years, Occupation - Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School Junwani Bhilai Distt. Durg (CG). 6aWA-"" \^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) WRIT PETITIONUNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 'ii... T Xl-HC-22 311^1'qil R-ii'* sn^i ?t)*i ^rfitt 's^ •^WWi, ^Til'M'is, I««Yii'yy ...<EOf.^.^.Mf1 \3 11HWI SRlirai 200 'fa^I" an^iTOiiw^to SB: Hon'bieShri Manindra Mohan 10-01-2011 Shri Vipin Tiwari, counsel fort Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer Heard. Leamed counsel app^ring fo is entitted to benefit of two advanc' passed B.Ed examination before submitted that the issue involved integra and the same has been finall in ttie case of Asha SaQeenays^ 59. ; the petWoner submils that the petitioner incremente on account of she havjng h|er appointment at her own cost. it is Uie present petition is no ionger res decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court Staite^fM.P. & Ore.. 2009 niDMPJR (SC) It is further submitted ttiat thisl order dated 06-02-2009 passed in W( for the petitioner further draws 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal ^ judgment of the Supreme Court in tifi order passed by this Court in anol have been issued for consideratioit increments as per circulair dated 21] Pradesh, after verification of the fac^ Learned counsel for the respo)' would aiso be considered on the same In view of the statement mad^ with a direction to the respondent aijthoriUes ^1*1^41-1 iTTRcTf ^f "fe^ '<f^reiR ii SlPOT SD^I Bhrivastava. J. fe petinoror. t>r ttie State/respondents. ICourt has also taken a similar view in its .P.(S)No.6257of2008. Learned counsel alttention of this Ceurt to oroer dated |o.124 of 2009, wherein reiying upon the (e case of Asha Saxena (supra) and ttie ther Writ Appeal No.87/»09, dlrectlons of ttie case for grant of two advance l.09-1974 issued by the State of Madhya pleaded in Uis petition. tdente submte that case of the prttioner nhe tines. above, this petnlon is firally disposed off to eonsider and decide the ctaim [i;n^?f»?a '2JD E-HC-22 ? t -><l'4lc1*<, o'dly'ia, faciiyy sni[?r 1g?Rf? '(s),i^e . ^o/jj •'g^ '200 HW"\\ th'tfl^ RititiH' sn^rq? ^•lirf) 3nS?i 5fr(ltf:ti ^^ an^i'^RiTWtrita ^- -^ ^r Deefrti *wii'i41-i ^WvS ^ f?tst <r»iyi( ^; aipai? sn^t of the petitioner Tor grant of two ajivance increments as per circular dated 21-09-1974 issued by the State of |Wadhya Pradesh, after verificaUon of me facts pleadect in the petition within a period of eight weetes from today. M.mindraMohanShrivastava Judge tTI^