1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2617 OF 2004 Mr. Vasant Shivram Shinde (Since deceased through his LR’s) 1a. Mr. Uday Vasantrao Shinde & Anr. .... Applicants Vs. Smt. Uma Umeshkumar More (Since deceased through her LR’s) 1A. Mr. Dinar Umeshkumar More & Anr. .... Respondents Mr. Anilkumar Patil for the Applicants. Mr. Deepak Natu i/b. M/s. N. Deepak & Co. for Respondent Nos. 1A and 1B. Smt. A. A. Mane, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATE : MAY 6, 2010 P.C. : Consent Terms are tendered by the learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties. The Consent Terms are signed by the Applicant No. 1a as well as the Respondent No.1A. It is stated that both Applicant No. 1a and Respondent No.1A are personally present in Court and they have admitted the contents of the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are duly signed by the Advocates representing Applicants and Respondent Nos. 1A and 1B. The Second Respondent State of Maharashtra is a formal 2 party. The learned counsel appearing for the Applicants states that the Consent Terms are approved by the Applicant No. 1(b) and a separate affidavit of Applicant No.1(b) confirming correctness of the Consent Terms will be filed on or before 10th June, 2010. Mr. Natu the learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.1A and 1B states that the Consent Terms are approved by Respondent No. 1B and an affidavit to that effect will be filed by Respondent No.1B on or before 10th June, 2010. 2. The Consent Terms are taken on record and are marked as “X” for identification. The statements made in the Consent Terms are accepted. True copies of the Consent Terms shall be annexed to the affidavits of Applicant No.1a and Respondent No.1B. The undertakings in the Consent Terms are accepted. 3. The Criminal Application is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. [A.S. OKA, J.]