: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.451 OF 2006 Pushpa A. Pachore ....Appellant V/s. Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Jaysingpur ....Respondents Mr.Amit Borkar for the Appellant. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2007. P.C. : 1. I am not inclined to entertain this Second Appeal, as no question of law arises. 2. However, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant states that the Appellant desires to make an application for regularization, as there are only minor variations which have been complained of even in the impugned order under Section 53 of the M.R.T.P. Act. 3. The Appellant is at liberty to make an application for regularization of the offending structure/work. If the same is made on or before 24.9.2007, the Respondents shall not implement the : 2 : notice till the decision of the application and for a period of two weeks thereafter, if the order is adverse to the Appellant. 4. The Second Appeal is accordingly disposed of.