IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3382 of 2008 M/S DAYA NAND PRASAD SINHA & COMPANY Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 2 08.07.2008 It is the contention of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the impugned order contained in Annexure – 1 is an ex parte order. This has been done without any notice to him or an opportunity of hearing. This makes the order assailable at this stage. It is not possible for this Court in absence of records to accept the contention of the petitioner on the face value, but, he surely given an indulgence to appear before the competent authorities, verify the records and make his submission that it is an ex parte order without notice to him. If it is so, then the authority will be bound not to implement the impugned order without the opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and considering the matter after taking into consideration his part of the submissions. The writ application is disposed of with the above liberty. Rajeev/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)