IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16384 of 2009 CHANDAN TIWARY @ CHANDAN TIWARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 24.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Also heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, who is representing opposite party no.2. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that though there is allegation of demand and torture for its non- fulfilment but reality is that the informant herself deserted the petitioner. She was intending to marry another person for which she realized Rs. 50,000/- and a chain that has been explained to further exploiting the petitioner otherwise if a false paper is being manufacture and in that, status of family is shown of Rs. 50,000/- and a chain, how that can be more than lacs at the occasion of snatching articles of the informant and making further demand. Another marriage is alleged though denied but constituting bailable offence. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Amba P.S.Case No. 84/07, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)