1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.3630 OF 2009 Ravindra s/o Bhaurao Patil Shisode and anr. PETITIONERS. V E R S U S The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..RESPONDENTS. Shri S. S. Thombre, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri S.D. Kaldate AGP for respondent-State. Shri A.N. Nagargoje, Advocate for resp. 6 and 7. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J : DATE : 2nd JULY, 2009 PER COURT :- 1. Since the present petition arises out of interlocutory orders , I find that interest of justice will met by directing the respondent No.2 for deciding revision filed by the petitioners within a stipulated period. It is reported that though the matter was fixed on 30th of June, 2009, surprisingly on 4/06/2009 the petitioners came to know that the respondent No.2 has vacated the interim relief on 28.05.2009. Now it is informed that the matter is adjourned to 28th of July, 2009. 2. In that view of the matter, the parties are directed to appear before the respondent No.2 on 28.07.2009. The respondent No.2 shall hear the parties on the same day and dispose off the revision within a period of three weeks therefrom. The petition is therefore disposed 2 off. It is further directed that since an interim order is operating in the petition, the same shall continue to operate till the decision by respondent no.2 in the revision and for a further period of one week from the date of decision. ( B. R. GAVAI ) JUDGE .....- aaa/wp3630.09 3