(CP 176 of 2011 in WP 6936 of 2008 with CP 408 of 2009 in WP 6926 of 2008) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 176 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6936 OF 2008 Ravindra Ramchandra Mahajan ...Petitioner Vs. Dnyaneshwar Sitaram Bhoye The President, Kavivarya Kusumagraj Adivasi Sutar Samiti, Nashik and Ors. ...Respondents ----- Ms.Kumud A. Bhatia for Petitioners Mr.S.K. Shinde for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 Mr. A.I. Patel -AGP for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 ----- WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.408 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITOIN NO. 6926 OF 2008 Mrs. Sangeeta Bhaskar Patil ...Petitioner Vs. Dnyaneshwar Sitaram Bhoye The President, Kavivarya Kusumagraj Adivasi Sutar Samiti, Nashik and Ors. ...Respondents (CP 176 of 2011 in WP 6936 of 2008 with CP 408 of 2009 in WP 6926 of 2008) ----- Ms.Kumud A. Bhatia for Petitioners Mr.S.K. Shinde for Respondent Nos.1 to 5 Mr. A.I. Patel -AGP for Respondent No.6 ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 9th February, 2011 P.C. 1. Parties have settled the dispute. They have filed the Minutes of Order which is signed by the Petitioner and the Respondent No.1, who is the main contesting party and by their respective advocates and also the learned AGP appearing on behalf of the State. The Minutes of order are taken on record and marked ‘X-1’ and ‘X-2’ for the purpose of identification. Since the facts in both the petitions are identical, this contempt petition is disposed of by a common order. 2. Contempt petition is, accordingly, disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (V.M. KANADE J.)