IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.70 of 2009 SHAKTI NATH SINGH S/O LATE BHOLA NATH SINGH, R/O VILLAGE- PELAGARH, P.S.- KADWA, DISTRICT- KATIHAR Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. MUKTI NATH SINGH S/O LATE BHOLA NATH SINGH 3. GANESH PRASAD SINGH S/O LATE HARI NATH NANDAN BOTH ARE R/O VILALGE- PELAGARH, P.S.- KADWA, DISTRICT- KATIHAR. ----------- 2 14/07/2009 This application for grant of special leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 21.5.2009 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Katihar in Complaint Case No. CA 2124 of 2002/667 of 2009 whereby the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 were acquitted from the charges under sections 418 and 419 of the Indian Penal Code. Grievance of the petitioner is that though ingredient of section 418 of the Indian Penal Code is made out in this case but the learned trial court has unnecessarily disbelieved the case of the complainant. In my view grievance of the petitioner does not appear to be correct because of the narrations in the judgment. The petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 are full brothers and they are contesting their case before the Civil Court. Accordingly, I am of the opinion that the learned trial court has given valid reasons for passing the order of acquittal. I see no merit in this application. It is thus dismissed. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)