IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33249 of 2008 ACHHA LAL MAHTO @ ASHALAL MAHATO … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp.Party For the petitioner: Shri Manoj Kumar Singh For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta, APP ----------- 4. 26.11.2008 Heard. The contention is that the parties appeared before the learned Magistrate for settlement of the dispute in the light of the direction issued to the parties by order dated 24.10.2008 passed in the present petition. The contention further is that 4.12.2008 has been fixed as the date for finally settling the matter. The Court does not have any reason for not directing the court below to extend the period of provisional bail granted to the petitioner by the above noted order which was for a period of one month. If the petitioner does not reconvey the land to the lady then the court shall assume that there was no further extension of time of provisional bail of the petitioner and it shall take steps for committing the petitioner to custody. 2 This petition stands finally disposed of. Let this order be communicated to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, in Harsidhi P.S.Case No. 80 of 2006 through fax at the cost of the petitioner. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)