3E: WW, awng, W c w P @N» m m (wigaa) ‘ 1‘ mzrfm aném Wa 'W?f ‘I§ Fgtir I‘mrgn gim m S‘BJ HON’BLE MR. JUMICE PRH‘INKER DIWAKER. 94.08.201 1 )unsd for tho petitioner. the State. The pastitioner was 'mi Teachers in the year 19?3 on a complatjon of hiS probation p61 scale of Rs. 169-300. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the above issue has been considered by Tlibunal, Jabaipur in O.A. No. Yadu and 56 others Vs. State ofMP. and others, whereha it was held that the oimilarly situated teachers are entitied to regular pay scale with eEcct &om the. appointment. The matter was t Court. The appeal was dism; Court upholding the decision < the TeachersfAssistant Teaohi scale from the date of init} submitted that this Coxm Whil WJ’. (S; No. 4725/2006 betw Vs. State of Chhawsgarh 01.0906 allowed the petitior Within a peiiod of ten days? raising ail the grievances. Shri Anil Singh Rajput, Ct Shri N.Naha Roy, PL. for Hmc/‘QFL 200 tially .appointad as AssiStant Mad pay of Rs. 100~150. After iod, he was; grantod regular pay the MP. State Administrative 2745/89 between Madhukant date of initial iken up to the Hon‘bie Supreme ssed by the Hon’ble Supreme If the Tn‘bunal to the effect that :rs are entitied to reguiar pay a1 appointment. 1t is further e coqoidering the same issue in een Amar Sai Ram & Others and Others by order dated Vere to make a representation X£~HC 78 §§ Wm?! swam Accordingly the petitioner s granted liberty to make a repmsentation raking all his g cvauces in the Eight of the .ircular dated 27. 12.2008 e concemed mspondant is directed to d€cide the representati n, if any, in accordance with law, on its own merits, Within a p riod 6f eight weeks fmm the 'on subject to Verificatioo of Wm Wmf 1§ fgta rm §§ aim m aforesaid judgment and the (Annexure P/4), aild in turn date of receipt of the mpresenta the facts. It is made clear that this t opinion on the merits of the case would be at liberty to decide t1 accordance with law. In View of the fomgoing, th order as to coets. :ouxt has not expressed axiy and the authority concerned 16 representation strictly in is petition is disposea of. No Sdl- Pritinker Diwakal‘ Judge warm Wt 200 31mm (whee) 3E1 mm em tam