CRM No. M-33920 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. M-33920 of 2008 Date of decision: 21.01.2009 Ramphal Yadav ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. J.V. Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Senior DAG, Haryana. Rajan Gupta, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was the Manager of PCARDB Limited i.e. the Bank in question. According to the counsel, three loans were advanced by the petitioner on recommendation of the Land Valuation Officers of the bank. Out of the three loans, two loans have been fully recovered with interest. However, the third loan which was advanced, will fall due in November, 2009. The counsel further submits that the only allegation against the petitioner is that loans were not used for the purpose, they were disbursed. He further submits that pursuant to the order dated December 24, 2008, the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further interrogation. Learned counsel for the State (on the instructions from S.I. Partap Singh, who is present in Court) does not dispute this factual position. Keeping in view the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the petitioner deserves the concession of anticipatory bail. Consequently, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated December 24, 2008 is hereby made absolute. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE January 21, 2009 'rajpal'