IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. 58525-M of 2005 DATE OF DECISION : 11.09.2006 Jarnail Singh .... PETITIONER Versus State of Punjab and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. A.S. Jattana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Gill, AAG, Punjab. * * * Petitioner Jarnail Singh has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuing direction to respondents No.3 and 4 to register a criminal case against respondent No.5 on the basis of complaint made by him, copy of which has been annexed with the petition as Annexure P-1. Pursuant to the notice issued by this Court, reply by way of affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rural, Patiala, on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 has been filed in Court today. The same is taken on record. Its copy has been supplied to counsel for the petitioner. In the reply, filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4, it has been stated that enquiry into the allegations levelled by the petitioner was got conducted through Superintendent of Police, Operation, Patiala and the allegations were found to be false. Keeping in view the aforesaid reply and the fact that the petitioner has alternative remedy, as has been held by this Court in Mithlesh Kumari v. State of Punjab, 2002 (4) RCR (Criminal) 541 and by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gangadhar Janardan Mhatre v. State of Crl. Misc. No. 58525-M of 2005 -2- Maharashtra and others, (2004) 7 SCC 768 and Minu Kumari and another v. State of Bihar and others, (2006) 4 Supreme Court Cases 359, I am not inclined to issue the direction sought for in this petition. Dismissed. September 11, 2006 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE