IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR SECOND APEPAL NO.359/2010 M/S RAJENDRA OIL MILL & ORS ..VS.. M.S.E.B. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or judges Orders. CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE: 9/8/2010 Heard Shri Sharma, the learned counsel for the appellants. The second appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law: Whether the first appellate court could have held that the amount of Rs.1,32,671/- which was deposited by the appellant in view of the directions passed by this court in yet another litigation should be treated as full and final settlement of the suit claim, specially when the first appellate court had clearly observed that the M.S.E.B. had failed to prove the exact arrears of the energy charges. Call R & P. JUDGE CIVIL APPLICATION CAS NO.647/2010 Heard learned counsel for the appellant. There is no reason to stay the effect and operation of the judgment passed by the first appellate court during the pendency of the second appeal, as the amount of Rs.1,32,671/- was already deposited by the appellant no.1 and was transferred to the account of the respondent – M.S.E.B. in terms of order passed by this court in some other proceedings. Civil application for stay is therefore, rejected. JUDGE SMP.