f'^'^a HIGHCpURT OFCHHATTISeARH.BILASPUR W.P. (81 No.4978/2007 PBTITIONER RE8PONDENT8 Purushottam Sahu, Soa of Lafe Shri Shyam Lal Sahu, s^ed about 60 years, Resident of ViUa^ Karra, Tahsil Kurud, Distnct Dhain.tari (C.G.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, ThTough: The Secretary, Water Resoiirces Department, D.K.S. ' Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Executive Engmeer, Water Manageinent Division Rudri, Tahsil and District Dbamtari (C.G.) 3. The Sub Divisional Offlcer, Water Managem.ent Sub Division No.l Rudri, TahsU and District Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PBTITION tntDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDI& Appearsuce: Shri P.P. Sahu, Counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri N.K. Agrawal, Senior Advocate and Deputy Advocate General with Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Govt. Advocate for the State/ respondents. ORAL ORDER (31.10.2007) SUNILKUMAR SINHA^ J. Heard, Lcacaed counsel for the petitioner submits that a permaaent Gang-m.au is to be retired at the age of 62 years ia accordaace wifh the Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshifd-Ayu) Adhimycmi 1967 read wifh Fundaniental RDles, 5G. He also submits fhat the point raised has been decided by fhis Court in batoh of matters i.e. W.P. No, 108/2005 aad many ofher cormected matters on 04.01.2007, reported iu 2007 (2) C.GJ^.J. 39 IGooiwa. & Others vs. Stwte ofC.Q.aniS ofhcrsj aad this matter is squarely covered by fhat decteion, which inay be dteposed of on the same terms. )~ W.P.(S)No.4978/2007 '2^ Leamed counsel for fhe State fairiy agrees that this matter is covered by tbe said decision. However, he submits that ia some matters the State has filed writ appeals. Unless some interun order is passed, merely on account of filing of the writ appeal, hearing of this writ petition cannot be kept ia abeyauce, when fhe matter is squarely covered by the said judginent In fhe result, this petition is aBowed. It is disposed ofiu terms of the oider dated 04.01.2007 passed in W.P. No. 108/2005 and other coimected matters. No order as to cost. Siisi! Kumar Sinha Judge Rao/ Shyna