(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5532 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5532 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5532 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5031 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5031 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5031 OF 2005 Prashant G. Belwalkar ...Applicant Versus M/s. Datamatics Information Technology Ltd. & Anr ...Respondents ..... Ms. Nita Solanki i/b M/s. M/s. Kiran Jain & Co. Advocate for Applicant Ms. Mamta Panigrahi, Adv.for Respondent No.1. Mr. R.S. Khadapkar, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 26TH AUGUST, 2005 DATED: 26TH AUGUST, 2005 DATED: 26TH AUGUST, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- . Not on board. Taken on board. 1. Heard both sides. 2. The applicant has preferred this application for amending case No.434 of 2001 and C.R. No. 49 of 2001 mentioned in Criminal application No.5031 of 2005 which has already been disposed of by this Court by order dated 12.8.2005. It is stated by the applicant that due to oversight of the applicant and the respondent the said numbers have wrongly been mentioned in the application and which have been subsequently reflected in the order dated 12.8.2005. (-2-) In view of the above, I am inclined to allow this application. Hence, leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 3. In view of the amendment, C.R. No. No.49 of 2001 and case No. 434 of 2001 which are mentioned in the order dated 12.8.2005 shall read as C.R. No.49 of 2000 and the case No. 434/P/2001, respectively. The order dated 12.8.2005 shall stand modified accordingly. 4. Application is disposed of. *****