THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.11345 of 2010 ORDER: It is stated that the petitioner along with one Ch. Radha Krishna Reddy is in possession of the land admeasuring 500 sq. yards in Sy.Nos.55 and 56 situated at Ward No.5, Block No.5, Sahebnagar Khurd village, Hayathnagar Revenue Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. When some third parties tried to interfere with their possession, the petitioner along with the said Radha Krishna Reddy filed a suit in O.S.No.14 of 2010 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy District, seeking perpetual injunction restraining the defendants therein from interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment in respect of the subject property, and the same is pending. While so, when the 1st respondent, at the instance of respondents 2 and 3, was calling the petitioner and making him to sit in the police station hours together, the petitioner filed W.P.No.6339 of 2010 before this Court and the same was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue the remedy before the Commissioner of Police and ACP. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 1st respondent, at the instance of respondents 2 and 3, is interfering with the civil disputes and, therefore, he seeks a direction to the 1st respondent not to interfere with the civil disputes. Except stating that a suit for injunction has been filed and the same is pending, the petitioner has not stated as to what remedies have been pursued pursuant to the orders of this Court in W.P.No.6339 of 2010. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to express any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, as admittedly the petitioner has not made any attempt to pursue his civil remedies and if really the 1st respondent is interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land in question, he would have made a complaint or representation before the superior authorities. But, without there being any complaint whatsoever, no writ of Mandamus as sought for by the petitioner can be issued. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 12-05-2010 V v/Prv