IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.Gl ^ M.A. N0. /Z_ /2007 ^ APPELLANT PLAINTIFF RESPONDENTS 1, ^E)EFENDANTS ^^ y c^ ^^ ^^^ <^ .3, ^" 4. 5. ^"' ^- ./Ramsagar, S/o.Sohan Satnami / Aged about 31 Years, Agriculturist, R/o. Mudhipar, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS Ramlal, S/o. Hagru Satnami Aged about 50 years, Agriculturist, R/o. Mudhipar, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur C.G.) Santosh, S/o. Ramlal Satnami, aged about 25 years, Agriculturist, R/o. Mudhipar, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) .Savitri Bai, Wd/o. Prabhu Satnami, aged about 23 years, R/o. Ghursena, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.) Radheshyam, S/o. Ramlal, aged about 15 years, Minor, through natural guardian, father Ramlal, R/o. Mudhipar, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Pawan Kumar, S/o. Ramlal, aged about 12 years, Minor, through natural guardian father Ramlal, R/o. Mudhipar, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Premkumari, D/o. Ramlal, aged about 8 years, minor, through natural guardian Father Ramlal, R/o. Mudhipar, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ^. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.) MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER ORDER'43 RULE 1 (r) OF THE CODE OF GIVIL PROCEDURE '-—:-'^t-HC—78 3?T?^?[ ^FT ^fNF ^TF 37I^T'^RN? k/ Gopal WR^IT^»W^ 'S^ -^WW^ ^Tl1-(H<l^, fs|<v1H^ , <^^' Ms. /^/^?- "W^. 200 ^V T=RW (^(f^<^T) '(PRTOT ^<t<T 3?T^T S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasd 18-10-2010 Shri B.L.Dembra, counselj Shri R.K.Tiwari, counselfct Shri Sanjeev Agraw^il State/respondent No.7. Learned counsel appearir| this appeal has become infru^ finally disposed of. The miscellaneous appeal <=M^?(n<fln WR^if ^' fe^ <P»i^i< ^^TRw^T^fT ant Kumar Mishra for the appellant. >r respondent No.3. Panel Lawyer for the g forthe parties would submit that tuous as the suit itself has been is dismissed as infructuous. Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge