1 CA 1600/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICAITON NO. 1600 OF 2009 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 22O OF 2001 Kushal Vikas Chudiwala ...Applicant vs. Vikas Tolaram Chudiwala & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.N.P. Shimpi for the Applicant. Mr.Sanjay Udeshi for Respondent No.6. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 7, 2010 P.C. :- 1 Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. A.O.No.220/2001 was dismissed in default on 28 th September, 2006. Since then, no interim relief is operating in favour of the appellant. 2 The learned Counsel for respondent no.6, who is defendant no.6 before the trial court, makes a statement that the suit is fixed today for final 2 CA 1600/2009 arguments. The appeal which is sought to be restored was filed against rejection of interim relief passed about 10 years ago. Therefore, I do not see any reason to restore that Appeal. No purpose will be served by hearing the same at this stage. Therefore, the following order will meet the ends of justice :- 3 The trial court shall expedite the hearing of the SC Suit No.3807/2000 and dispose of the same, at the earliest. 4 The application stands disposed of. (J.H. BHATIA, J.)