IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 243 OF 2004 Tukaram Daji Patil & Ors. ...... ...... ...... Appellants V/s Bandu Rau Salunkhe & Ors. ...... ...... ...... Respondents. Mr.Pratap Patil, Adv. For the appellants. Mr.Anilkumar Patil, Adv. For respondent Nos. 2B to 2F & 3A to 3C. CORAM: R.V. MORE, J. 19th NOVEMBER, 2008. PC: Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. Suit filed by original plaintiff for injunction was decreed by the trial Court holding that the respondents-plaintiffs are owners of the suit property. Present appellant-original defendant preferred an appeal before the lower appellate court. Appellate Court confirmed the decree of the lower court with slight modification. 2. The respondents-plaintiffs claiming the title to the property through Tanabai who became absolute owners of the suit property since suit property was given to her in lieu of maintenance in a suit filed by her against Dnyanu, brother of her deceased husband. The lower courts below have concurrently found that the respondents- plaintiffs are in lawful possession of the suit property. The aforesaid 1 finding of fact is recorded after appreciating evidence on record. Appreciation of evidence cannot be said to be perverse. No question of law, much less a substantial question of law is involved. Hence second appeal stands dismissed. In view of disposal of second appeal Civil application No.239/04 does not survive. 19.11.08 (R.V. MORE, J.) 2