1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL REVIEW PETITION NO.99/2008 IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2192/2008 Kailash Khandelwal Versus The State of Rajasthan and others Date of order ::: January 30,2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PREM SHANKER ASOPA Mr.R.B.Mathur, for the petitioner Despite service, no one appeared to contest the review application on 28.1.2009. The order dated 28.1.2009 is as follows: “No one appears on behalf of the writ petitioner to contest the review petition filed by the respondent Department. Put up on 30.1.2009. In case no one appears for the writ petitioner on the next date, then the review petition will be decided. List on 30.1.2009.” Today also,no one appears to contest the review application. Submission of Mr. R.B.Mathur is that the petitioner was declared ineligible for renewal of licence for the year 2008-2009 2 vide order dated 26.2.2008 (Anx.R-5) for the reason that he has not deposited the annual renewal fee of Rs.3,80,000/- but the said fact was not disclosed by the petitioner at the time of passing of the final order dated 1.4.2008 whereby the writ petition was allowed in terms of the decision dated 31.3.2008 passed in SBCWP No.1960/2008 and other similar writ petitions. A perusal of the reply to the writ petition, it clearly reflects that the case is not similar to the cases decided on 31.3.2008 and the petitioner has been rightly declared ineligible on account of not depositing amount of Rs.3,80,000/-, therefore, the review petition is allowed and the order dated 1.4.2008 is recalled. Consequently, the SBCWP No.2192/2008 is dismissed. (PREM SHANKER ASOPA) J. गोपाल