r^ IN THE HIGH COVRT OF JUDICATURE AT BttASPUR W.P No^-^/2003 ^ PETmONER Dr. Sanjay Tiwari, Son of Shri RN.Tiwari. Aged about 38 ReadentofOmNqgarJarfiabhata B3LASPUR(C.G) -VERSUS- RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. /' StateofChhattisgarti, Throu^i, Secrdtexy H®hwEducation, D.K.S Bhawan, Mantralya, Raipur DistrictRaipur (C.G.) Du'ector, Higher Education, Science Coltege Canyus Rftipur (C.G) The State Administrative Tribunal, Tlirou^i Secretary Raipur. District Rayur(C.G.) ^ ...^ WRCT PITITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AS ORDER RECARDING THE PENDING MATTER BirORE THE ADMINKTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BENCH AT RADPUR. T ^, XI-HC-22 "S^ ^l^!<n4, ^^i^4!^, 'f^TRTy; •w^n"%m^' ""^ 2003 'i^<r Wtf^T^ •?TTTOf ^ ft^t Tf^TSR "^'^^f^r^n^T Shri Prakash Tiwari, counsej Shri Ranbir Singh, ^o.vt. Ad Heard both the counsel. By this writ petition under for the petitioner, ^ocate for the State/rB^pondent No.l.- jArticles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner to wifndraw Originai Application No<200/2001 fiied before the St^te Adniinistrative Tribunal, Raipur, The petitioner's case is tha|* the petitioner is workina as Assistant Professor at ^overnment Coiieg^ He was seiected throuah ©meraerl State 9overnment and theresftej seiected through the setection r^ade by the Pubfjc Seryice Commission for th©^am©po^t, The p@titio§| the period from 1989 onwards. from 1989 to 1994. The petiti State Administrative Tribunatl St©teAdministrative Tribunal hal the petitioner is sti!i pending be| To wlthdraw O.A.No.200/2001.! , Ratanpur, Distt. Bilaspur since 1989. cy appointment as per the poticy of the r, in the year 1994, the petitioner was i©rwas 9rant@.d annual increm^nts for Later on, respondent No<2 passed an order withdrawin9 the increment^ given to the petitioner for the period oner moved an applicatjon before the cha!!enging the sdd decision of respondent No.2, which was r^gi^ered as O.A.No,200/2001. The iearned counse! for t|ie petitroner submitted that the ^ been aboli^hed and the appiication of ore the Tribunai, the petitioner wants He further submitted thdt the -^•^h-s.^'"^^ XI-HC-22 ^H^T'^T feTi^'3T^T "^'RN'TtfiTr Soma ^ •^ © ^^ ^ff^I^P?, i^ft^K, [^di^y 'WH^f^TI^ 1^""""""""""""""""""7"Wl, 200'^ "^r^?" 3Tr^T ^crr^R ^fN -^_4 "peTiTloner ha3a7ro°^Th^BT~Tgffigzf to withdraw the Having heard the ^ovt. Advocate has no objecti^n In the circumstances, No.200/2001, is diowed to b^s withdrawn. Accordingiy/ the p^titior| ConsequenTly, LA.Noj appiication per^ding b@fore the Tribunal, iearn^d counsel for the petitioner, th©learned to the request of the petitioner. the appiication of th@ petitioner, OA. withdrawn -and the is as stand^ dispos^d of. .87J15/2003 a!so stands dlsposed of. "^Rf^Rt^T 'iTR^Tf ^ fe^ ^R^I^ '^ 3?f^R W^[ 6-x^spT^to fiic thi^ w^it p^titio^ in ordBr Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge f^i-^f^