IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 24639 of 2007 Between: M/s. Revathi Trading Corporation, Door No. 28/945 MIG No. 36, Sangamesh Nagar, Anantapur, Rep. by its Proprietrix P. Surya Kumar W/o. P. Prabhakar , aged 41 years,Ananthapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commercial Tax Officer, No. I Circle, Anantapur. 2 The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Anantapur Division, Anantapur. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly in the nature of writ of Certiorari after calling for connected and relevant records connected to the impugned order and demand notice dt. 31-3-2007 in Form B3 in G.I.No. Nil/2000-01 (CST) issued by the Commercial Tax Officer, No. I Circle, Anantapur Seeking to recover the amount mentioned in the notice for the assessment year 2000-01 (CST) under Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act 1957 without there being any revision order being served on the Petitioner as mentioned in the consequential assessment order and its receipt by the assessing authority without there being any service of such proceedings in terms of the procedure contemplated under Rule 58 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1957 by holding the same as illegal, arbitrary improper unfair and without authority of law and without jurisdiction as also hit by the law of limitation and grant such other relief or reliefs as are deemed to be fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.V.J.K.KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER:(Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdraw. No order as costs. ____________________ Smt. T.Meena Kumari, J. _____________ Ms. G.Rohini, J. February 28, 2008 MAS