IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10156 of 1992 NARENDRA KISHORE SINHA, SON OF LATE BALBHADRA PRASAD MUKHTAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BALUA BAZAR, POLICE STATION- MOTIHARI, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN. ..PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR (PRIMARY EDUCATION), GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, PATNA. ..RESPONDENTS. with CWJC No.10158 of 1992 DEO NARAIN SINHA, SON OF LATE RAM LAKHAN SINHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GAVASPUR, POLICE STATION- GAURICHAK, DISTRICT- PATNA. ..PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY-CUM-COMMISSIONER, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE SPECIAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR (SECONDARY EDUCATION), HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BUDH MARG, PATNA. 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, YOUTH WELFARE, BIHAR, PATNA. ..RESPONDENTS. with CWJC No.10160 of 1992 2 SHATRUGHAN PRASAD SINGH, SON OF LATE BALDEO NARAIN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- FERUSHA, POLICE STATION- GARKHA, DISTRICT- SARAN. ..PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR ( PRIMARY EDUCATION), GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, GOPALGANJ. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, GOPALGANJ. ..RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3. 07.04.2011. By these three writ petitions, the petitioners, who were teachers in Government Schools or members of Subordinate Education Service, have prayed for issuance of writ directing the State to extend their services by two years from 58 years to 60 years. From the order sheet, it appears that these cases were directed to be listed after disposal of C.W.J.C. No. 84 of 1992, wherein similar issue was already pending consideration by this Court. It appears that said C.W.J.C. No. 84 of 1992 was considered and dismissed by following the Full Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Bandhu Prasad Singh and others Vrs. The State of Bihar, reported in 3 1994(2)PLJR 279. In the said Ful Bench, this Court has nagatived a similar plea of the petitioner. The Full Bench having so spoken, it does not lie with this Court to take a different view of the matter. These three writ applications are meritless and dismissed accordingly. Ibrar/- ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)