IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20280 of 2003 Between: M. Rama Rao, S/o. Veera Swamy, R/o D.No.57-14-17A, Patamata Veedhi No.2, New Postal Colony, Vijayawada. ... PETITIONER AND Vijayawada Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Commissioner, Vijayawada. ... RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent Corporation to entertain the plan for making construction in Assessment No.35459 (New Assessment No.269318, ward No.32E.,Patamata of Vijayawada Municipal Corporation, declaring the action of the respondent as illegal and ultra vires to the provisions of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also the mandatory provisions of the A.P. Municipal Corporation Act. Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. V.S.R. Anjaneyalu Counsel for the respondent: Smt. G. Jhansi The Court made the following Order: On 07-07-2009, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today, when the writ petition is called in the forenoon, a request is made to pass it over. As such, it is passed over to afternoon. When the writ petition is called in the afternoon, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. _____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. July 9, 2009 MRR ... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP {ANURADHA}