1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.W. NO. 109/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4349/2006 Santoshi Mahila Mandal and another vs. Presiding Officer and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- CORAM : S.R.DONGAONKAR, J. DATE : 27 th FEBRUARY, 2009 Heard Shri Khajanchi, Advocate, for the petitioner, Shri Sonare, A.G.P. for respondent No.1 and Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate, for Respondent No.2/applicant. Respondent No.2/applicant is claiming withdrawal of amount of Rs.1,50,000/- deposited by the petitioners Management towards backwages with interest as accrued to them. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the amount has already been directed to be invested in Fixed Deposit in the Nationalized Bank and accordingly the same has been invested. Office to verify. The learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that this Court while granting interim stay was of the view that that the impugned order is not correct and respondent no.2 was not entitled for reinstatement with backwages.. 2 The stay is granted to the reinstatement and hence respondent no.2 has not been reinstated. In the circumstances of the case, this application cannot be considered at this stage. However, the same is disposed of with a direction that the petition being of 2006 be listed for final hearing on 23rd March, 2009. Application disposed of. JUDGE Rvjalit