IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Misc.No.17361 of 2010 and Civil Writ Petition No.5332 of 1989 Date of Decision 10.01.2011 Smt.Ketki Sham ...... Petitioner VERSUS The Punjab State through Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and another ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: None for the petitioner. Mr.Sandeep Moudgill, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents-State. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J: Learned counsel for the respondents-State has submitted that the case of the petitioner with regard to service as well as pensionary benefits has already been decided. In this regard, he has placed on record documents Annexures R1 & R-2. In view of the matter, this petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as such. However, the respondents-State is directed to follow the decision, as contained in Annexures R1 and R-2 within three months positively. The petitioner, if still aggrieved, would be at liberty to have recourse the remedy as provided under law. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 10.01.2011. mamta-II