IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2008 / 31ST ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 20592 of 2008(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- OMMEN KOSHY , HOUSE NO.XXII/209, DARSHANA NAGAR-5,PATTATHANAM P.O.,KOLLAM BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR SRI.LEO GEORGE RESPONDENTS: ---------------- 1. KOLLAM CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KOLLAM CORPORATION KOLLAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, KOLLAM CORPORATION,KOLLAM. 3. CHARGE OFFICER, VADAKKEVILA ZONAL OFFICE KOLLAM CORPORATION KOLLAM. 4. VALSAKUMARY, W/O. CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAI CHAITHNYA, SAKTHI NAGAR, NEAR POST OFFICE, TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM. 5. CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAI,CHAITHANYA, SAKTHI NAGAR, NEAR POST OFFICE, TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.T.GOPALAKRISHNAN,SC,KOLLAM CORPORAT FOR R1 & 2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 20592 OF 2008 B ==================== Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2008 J U D G M E N T In this writ petition, what is essentially sought for by the petitioner is implementation of the decision taken by the 1st respondent culminating in Ext.P5. 2. Standing counsel appearing for the 1st respondent submits that after Ext.P5 was issued, two other notices were also issued requiring the cutting and removal of dangerous trees. It is stated that these two notices were not complied with and therefore within 2 weeks, they themselves are proposing to take action for the implementation of Ext.P5. I record the submission and close the writ petition on that basis. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp