THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.25387 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is working as a Counsellor in Andhra Pradesh Aids Control Society, the first respondent herein. At present, he is work a center at Nandyal. Stating that his age-old parents are residing a native place of Adoni, the petitioner submitted a representation to transf allocate him to that place. The first respondent issued orders, 18.09.2010, stating that the counseling for re-allocation would be under on 24.09.2010 at Hyderabad and the interested candidates can atte The vacancies that are available for allocation were mentioned. petitioner attended the counselling. His grievance is that the first respo is likely to transfer respondent Nos.3 and 4 to Adoni and reject his c With this background, he filed this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. On the face of it, the writ petition is premature. It is only when th respondent passes orders either rejecting the claim of the peti specifically or transferring respondent Nos.3 and 4 to Adoni that he can to have got a grievance or cause of action. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed leaving it open t petitioner to work out his remedies as and when the cause of action aris There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDD Date:07.10.2010 VGB