r u IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No.&57^ OF 2007 ^^ ^{3 c^ Jl 01 .(Tf^— \i; sl~~i "SKs a •:'^ ££: C "- d: 'fRY! PETITION UNDER ARTICLE_226__OF _THE "CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARY AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OP LIKE NATURE PETITIONER Tara Singh Verma, son of Shri Umedi Ram Verma aged about 37 years, R/o Village Mudhiya, Tehsil Saja, District Durg (C.G_]_ VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. 'State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. -Shri M.L. Pandey, Dy. Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare, Durg (C.G.) 3. 'Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Saja, District Durg (C.G.) 4. ^•/'l The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Rano, Tehsil Saja, District Durg JCG)_ 5. ?'L-" Jageshwar Goswami, Assistant Gram Panchayat Officer, Grain Panchayat Kurlu, Tehsil Saja, District Durg (CG) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.6093 OF 2007 PETITIONER Tara Singh Verma RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & others Gowri (Writ Petition underArticles 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Shailendra Shukla, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate for the State. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Advocate for the respondents N0.4&5. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 6th day ofApril, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 17-8-2007 (Annexure - P/1) whereunder on the basis of certain complaints against the petitioner, the charge of Gram Panchayat, Rano has been handed over tc the respondent No.5/Assistant Gram Panchayat Officer, Gram Panchayat, Kurlu. 3. At this stage, no relief can be granted, as the order impugned was passed on 17-8-2007 and on perusal of the order, it appears that this was temporary arrangement. However, the Deputy Director (Panchayat & Social Welfare), Durg, may again reconsider the issue and pass fresh order, in accordance with law and on its own merits, if the order dated 17-8-2007 still survives. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Ag Judge ^^ f.V't ^^^.,i>^aa^£^^S^ •w