IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 14953 of 2005 Between: R.Srinivasa Rao, S/o.Subbarayudu, R/o. Daivalaravur Village, Korisapadu Mandal,Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Executive officer, Sri Chennakesava and Anjaneya Swamy Temple, Daivalaravur village, Prakasam District. 2 The Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department, Ongole, Prakasam District. 3 The Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Tirupati, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the auction notice issued by the 1st Respondent herein dated 1-7-2005 measuring an extent of 5.14 cents situate in sy.no.30/1, Daivalaravur village, Korisapadu Mandal, Prakasam District, prakasam District, as arbitrary illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to hand over physical possession of the land measuring an extent of Ac.5.14 cents and continue the petitioner as tenant for a period of 3 years as per the auction notice dated 17-6-2003 issued by the 1st respondent herein and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.NAGARJUNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.N.INDRANI The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.14953 OF 2005 ORDER : Since the period of lease which is the subject of the writ petition expired long back, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J. 1st December 2008 *TSNR