® RE THE HIGH COURT OF' CHHATTISGAR ,0: HAT BTLASPUR /" T “ w‘P. NOTEMQ 12005 (3.3; /Devendra Kumar Ch aged about 32 year Bhagwat & Distt. Durg (C.G.) Kala, P. O. PETlTlONER andaniya s, S/o Shri Prasad, _ _ VERSUS RESPONDENTS Registrar Bilaspur, P. 0. & Dis Through aurt of Chhattisgarh, Genera! u. Rm$mw District Judge, Durg, P.O. & Di PETlTlON UNDE CONSTI stt. Durg (C.G.) R ARHCLE 2§6I2é7 OF {HE TUTION — FOR ISSUANCE OF WR1T OF Y OTHER QERHORARI AND MANDAMUS AND AN IWRIT 1 mRECTION / ORDEg; «V ‘ W $HT$ F9 WWWW w f) W 3‘QL Lévs W200 V mam (mama) . mamm ammsramia; mmmméw 7.11.2005 Smt. Mesra Jayaswal, 1 kdvocate with Shri B. R; Ghosh, Advocate for thE pe1itioner. Shli Manindra Shrivas va, Senior Advocate with Smt. Smitha Ghaj, Advocate for th Respondents. Healxi: petitioner submits that the petxhoner was appomfed t mpOIanly as contmgency pald employee (Dnver) Vlde order ated 4.3.1996 for a penod of 89 days. The appoinment was mmiwm aiWanéaT Learned cqunsel for enewed h‘me and again till he was appointed on probah‘on for a period of two years vide order dated. 13.10.1998. service of the petitioner was terminated after making pa ment of one month’s salary in lieu of the notice dated 7.9.2 00. The petin'oner had preferred an appeal before the Reg strar, High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur on 21.9.2 00 and thereafter an appeal was preferred . before the Regi trar General, High Court of Chhattisgarh on 15.2.2001 petitioner ;submits that the appeal is pending consider tion for more than four years before the Respondent N e e possible, preferably within a period of one month. Shri i \ Shrivastava, learned senior counsel assisted by Smt. Ghai 1mexure P/ 11). e Lealned counsel for ( SP/F l. Learned counsel for the spondent No.1 be directed to pennoner, as expeditiously as o petitioner submits that th decide the appeal filed by e r T e . Wmm$ ..... ............... mam (W) 7 mamé'mm have no objection to this prayer r the petitioner, however two e Respondent No.1 for decidihg E200 anéetaira‘aiis ammam mmW anéer $31%qan%21 submits that thé .mspondents made by learned counsel fc months time be granted to th the appeal. Having heard learned co regard V to the facts and Ci Respondent No. 1 is directed t stated appeal Within a perio of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. e petition stands disposed of. Wy/ h/Ja" mom \ unsel for the parties and having rcumstances of the case the consider and decide the above In view of the foregoing Certified copy, as per R les. ‘/> x/V Sdl? ‘ Satish K Judge Ag SP/FS/2005 - 20,000 i i