1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL REVIEW PETITION NO.130/07 IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1094/06 Date of order : 4/2/2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Suresh Goyal for the petitioner. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that when the writ petition was originally decided on 30.9.2007, it was wrongly given out on behalf of the Government that the selection process initiated by notification dated 22.8.2005 has been abandoned and cancelled by order dated 25.1.2006, but petitioner did not apply pursuant to fresh notification. It was argued that so far the selection process has not been abandoned, but at the same time, no fresh process has been initiated pursuant to the order dated 25.1.2006. It is argued that entire exercise has been made undertaken to help the owner of shop no.490. Even though if the respondents in the chart enclosed 2 therewith have proposed to bifurcate the shop no.490 in three parts, but so far no steps have been taken for inviting application or otherwise finalising the process of selection on the basis of earlier notification. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the judgment passed by this Court dated 30.8.07 and the order dated 25.1.2006, I find that the respondents abandoned the earlier process of selection considering the fact that the rationalization of the existing shops with regard to their size was required to be done because in some of the shops a larger area is covered whereas in some others, smaller area is covered. It was on that basis that the respondents decided to have the areas delineated. So far as the learned counsel count not point out pursuant to the earlier notification dated 22.8.05 any one has been made allotment and therefore the statement that was made on behalf of respondent that the process of selection was abandoned does not stand disproved. There is therefore no error in the order so as to warrant its 3 review. However, at the same time, I set the petitioner at liberty to make a representation to the Food Commissioner in inviting his attention to the policy decision taken by the Government in its order dated 25.1.2006 for rationalizing allotment of shops and consequently inviting fresh applications for making new allotments pursuant to location of new shops. If such representation is made, the Commissioner shall look into the same and do needful as may be warranted in law. The review petition is disposed of accordingly. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/