IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No.20 of 2008. Date of decision:30.07.2008. Abhinash Verma & Another ….Petitioners Versus Smt.Rattani Devi ….Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Dev Darshan Sud,J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr.N.K. Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Dev Darshan Sud,J. Respondents have been served. Nobody appears on their behalf. They are proceeded ex- parte. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the learned trial Court dismissing the application of the petitioner under Order 8 Rule 1- A(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to place on record copy of the demarcation report in case No.177 of 2000, titled: Avinash Vs.Gobindu, decided by the Assistant Collector IInd Grade, Hamirpur, alongwith the copy of the order passed in Civil Suit No.91 of 2001, titled: Gobindu vs. Avinash, decided 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? on 22.5.2001 and copy of the application under Order 39 Rule 4 as also the affidavit. The case of the petitioner was that by inadvertence certified copies of these documents could not be filed on the record earlier. He submits that these documents are absolutely necessary for the just determination of the case. The learned trial Court, holds that there is no sufficient reason as to why this application should be allowed. This is a hyper technical approach which cannot be accepted. The Court should have aware of the fact that what the petitioner sought to produce are certified copies of Court records. The documents were to be proved in accordance with law. The order cannot be sustained and is quashed and set aside. This petition is allowed. The petitioner will be entitled to produce the documents, as prayed for by him and the Court shall consider them in accordance with law. The petition is disposed of. All miscellaneous applications are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. July 30, 2008. (Dev Darshan Sud) (aks) Judge.