IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2009 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1931 RP.No. 355 of 2009(A) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.35499/2004 Dated 28/07/2005 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 IN WPC ----------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), ALUVA. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ANGAMALY. BY G.P. SRI.SANDESH RAJA RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER IN WPC -------------------------------- E.J.DAVIS, EDASSERY HOUSE, ANGADIKADAVU ROAD, ANGAMALY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... R.P. No.355 of 2009 in W.P.(C) No.35499 of 2004 .................................................................... Dated this the 26th day of May, 2009. ORDER Review is filed against the judgment whereby this court prohibited review petitioner from recovering any collection charges as payment was made by the defaulter voluntarily. In the review, review petitioner has no case that the facts stated in the judgment are incorrect. In fact, apart from effecting attachment by issuing notice, no concrete steps were taken for taking over possession or notifying the property for sale. Consequently I do not find any ground to interfere with the judgment in review proceedings. Review is consequently dismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms