IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31968 of 2009 PRAMOD KUMAR, Son of Singhasan Chaudhary, resident of village – Laxamipur, P.S. Sanjhauli, District – Rohtas. …….. Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……. Opp. Party. With Cr.Misc. No.33085 of 2009 MANISH KUMAR, Son of Late Ram Nath Chaudhary, resident of Village – Laxamipur, P.S. Sanjhauli, District – Rohtas. …… Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …… Opp. Party. ----------- 02/ 27.10.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner Pramod Kumar is working as Technician in Railway. As per the allegation in the FIR petitioner Pramod Kumar assured the complainant that he has connections with higher officials in the Railway and on payment of Rs.9,15,000/- employment can be arranged for Abinash Chaudhary and Sukhdeo Kumar. Entire amount was paid. Since appointment was not made, complainant asked for refund of money an amount of Rs,2,10,000/- was returned through cheque. Still Rs. 7,05000/- remained unpaid and whenever money was demanded threat was enhanced by the accused persons. Counsel for the petitioners submits that complainant and Binod Kumar brother of petitioners - 2 - Pramod Kumar and Manish Kumar were business partners. There is some dispute in connection with financial transactions and just to put pressure a false complaint case has been instituted for offence under Sections 406, 420 & 120B of the IPC. Counsel for the petitioners submits that complainant has not shown any transaction in between petitioner Pramod Kumar and Manish Kumar, whatever transactions have been shown, i.e., in between complainant and Binod Kumar. Considering these facts, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioners, namely, Pramod Kumar and Manish Kumar is allowed. They are directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case of their surrender before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 80 of 2009 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)