1 45 ss.3045.98 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3045 OF 1998 Panjab and Sind Bank. ... Plaintiffs Versus. Mahendra B. Tanna and anr. ... Defendants ----- Mr. K. Mody i/b M/s. Haridas and Company for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendants. ----- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 01 st February, 2011. JUDGMENT : 1 The suit is listed under the caption for “ex-parte decree”. Writ of summons has been duly served to the Defendants, but they have not entered appearance within the period stipulated by law. 2 The learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiffs has placed on record compilation of the original documents, which is marked as ‘X’ for identification. Perusal of the original documents and in view of sub- 2 45 ss.3045.98 Rule (3) of Rule 2 of Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the Plaintiffs are entitled to a decree. However, further interest will have to be granted at the rate of 12% per annum. 3 The suit is decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) with modification that further interest will be payable at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till payment or realization. 4 The Plaintiffs will be entitled to refund of Court-fees as per the rules. [ A.S.OKA, J ]