THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.26065 of 2008 DATED:29.9.2011 Between: G. Nageswara Rao and another … Petitioners And The Station House Officer G. Konduru Police Station G. Konduru, Krishna District … Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.26065 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent in not registering and investigating the complaint dt.9.11.2008 made by the petitioners, which was received by the respondent on 12.11.2008, as illegal and arbitrary and for consequential directions. It is the case of the petitioners that they acquired ownership and title to the land admeasuring Ac.8.15 cents in R.S. No.9; Ac.11.07 cents in R.S. No.14/3/A; and Ac.2.25 cents in R.S. No.14/1, totalling Ac.21.47, situated at Kadimpothavaram Village of Pinapaka Panchayat of G. Konduru Mandal, Krishna District. It is stated that in view of their purchase of the said land, they were granted pattadar pass books and title deeds by the Mandal Revenue Officer, G. Konduru Mandal. It is their grievance that some third parties, who are not party respondents to this writ petition, have obtained fabricated pattadar pass books and title deeds in their favour for the above said land. Questioning the said action of the third parties, the petitioners made a complaint dt.9.11.2008 to the respondent and the same was received by the respondent on 12.11.2008, but no action has been taken on the complaint. Hence, the writ petition. The respondent – Station House Officer, G. Konduru Police Station, Krishna District, has filed a counter affidavit. In the counter affidavit, while denying various allegations made by the petitioners, it is stated that when some third parties obtained title deeds and pattadar pass book for the land in question and interfered with the possession of the land, the petitioners have filed O.S. No.977 of 2006 on the file of the III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, and that as the dispute between the petitioners and the persons named in the complaint made by the petitioners is of purely civil nature, no further steps were taken on the complaint. Further, though the petitioners are seeking a direction to register complaint against third parties, they were not added as party respondents in this writ petition. It is categorically stated by the respondent in his counter affidavit that the dispute is of civil nature. Hence, no direction can be given to the respondent to register the complaint filed by the petitioners for taking up further investigation. More over, the persons against whom a direction is sought in this writ petition are not parties before this Court. In any event, if the petitioners still feel that there is manipulation of records with regard to the land in question by some third parties, the petitioners may avail remedy of filing private complaint under Section 200 of Code of Criminal Procedure, if so advised. For the aforesaid reasons, there is no merit in the writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 29.9.2011 bnr