IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34086 of 2008 AMARJEET PASWAN @ AMARJEET @ AMARJI PASWAN … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Smt. Anjana Mishra For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta, APP ----------- 5. 18.11.2008 Heard. The earlier order passed dismissing the prayer for bail of the petitioner is sought to be reconsidered. The totality of the finding of the Court while dismissing the prayer of the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No.54449 of 2006 is that the petitioner was the assailant of the deceased. This appears clearly stated by the Court in the operative paragraph of the order in the above noted petition as follows: “In view of specific allegation against the petitioner to have given knife blow to the deceased who sustained injuries on the neck and as a result thereof he succumbed to the injuries during the course of treatment, the prayer for bail is rejected.” I do not see any reason to reconsider the prayer. The petition is dismissed. There was a direction for expediting 2 the trial. The report appearing at Flag „A‟ indicates that four witnesses have been examined and for securing the attendance of other witnesses the trial court had issued processes but in the meantime the case was made over to another court, i.e., Fast Track Court No. 4, Jehanabad. The Presiding Officer of that court is likely to take fresh steps for procuring the attendance of the witnesses and he has further indicated that he will take six months‟ time in disposal of the trial. I believe, the learned Presiding Officer of the above noted court sticks to his words and concludes the trial within the time noted above. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)