HIGH COURT OF JUDiCATURE CHHATTiSGARH : BiLASPUR ,CJ. E BENCH: Writ Petifion No.2720 of 200 It. Vs. 2. Ravi Mohan Goswami S/'o Geeta Goswami, Aged about 28 years, Proprietor, Ravi Stone Crusher, Viiiage Sonpurkala, P.S & Tahsi! Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G) R/o. Sadar Road, fM'sgar Ambikapur, Tahsii Ambikapur, Dlstricf Surguja (CG) State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Mining Officer, Ambikapur, Tahsii Ambikapur, Distt Surguja (C.G.) Coiiecfor, (Mining Department), Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) Gram Panchayat, Sonpurkaia, Through: its Sarpanch, Viliage Sonpurkala, Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh, District Surgujs (C-G) iVlr. Manoj Paranjape, iearned counsel for the petitloRers. WT. Vinay Harit, iearned Dy. Adv. Gsnei'ai', for the State of C.G. h (Passed on 22nd June 2006} 'he petltioner was a mining iessee for the period snding 9/7/2004. After the lease was expired and his appiication for renewal was rejscted, he rnads an appiication {o the Collsctor, Ambikapur, tha sscond respondent herein, fo," permission to crush the bouiders which he claims to have extractsd vrhen the mining lease was in currency under t'ns provisions of the C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959 (for short 'the Code'). The sscond respondent has rsjactsd the appiication by ths impugned order stating that thers ss no provision in ihs Code to grant such licsnce. The correctness of the said order is assaiied in this writ oefition. -^. E t^ f-^\ \^-, (2) i heard iearned counssS for the parties. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner was not In a position to trace the power of the second rsspondent 'with reference to any ofthe provisions of the Code to grant psrmission sought by ths petitioner to crush the bouiders extracted by him. On that short ground, the writ petition is iiabie to be dismissed and it is accordingiy dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Chief Justice 'r <-