IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2079 of 2009 Date of decision: 30.04.2009. S.Ram Kumar Petitioner Versus Micromax Informatics Ltd. ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Ashish Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. It is apparent from the record and also from the presentation made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the essential grievance of the petitioner is with regard to non disposal of the relevant plea by the learned District Judge, Gurgaon urgently. In that context, it is argued that every day's delay has wide ranging professional/economic repercussions for both the parties. A decision of the plea either way, it is argued, shall serve the interest of justice. In view of the nature of the grievance indicated on behalf of the petitioner, the petition shall stand disposed of in limine with a direction to the learned District Judge, Gurgaon to dispose of the interim stay plea (under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 C.P.C.) on 4.5.2009. It will be for the learned Trial Court to even consider duly notified preponement for the purpose aforementioned. Disposed of accordingly. The order shall be FAXED today itself. Copy of the order be given to the learned counsel for the petitioner under the signatures of the Court Secretary. April 30, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge