IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND JANUARY 2008 / 12TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 147 of 2008(P) ------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------ BEENA KUMARI S., H.S.A.(HINDI), KATTACHAKONAM HIGH SCHOOL, NALANCHIRA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.SREEDHARAN NAIR SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR SRI.SAJU JOHN SRI.V.VARGHESE RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. NAZEEMA, H.S.A., GOVERNMENT SCHOOL, NADAYARA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ======================= W.P.(C) No. 147 of 2008(P) ======================= Dated this the 2nd day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT After 7 years of service at Paruthippally Government High School, at the request of the petitioner for transfer to the educational Sub District of Chalai, Pattom or Kattella, the petitioner was given a transfer to Kattachakonam High School, as per order dated 7-11-2007 of the 3rd respondent Deputy Director of Education. Petitioner alleges that while so, under the influence of the respondents 2 and 4, Ext.P1 order was passed, by which the petitioner's posting to Kattachakonam was cancelled and the 4th respondent was posted to Kattachakonam in her place. In the above circumstances, the petitioner filed Ext.P2 before the 1st respondent. Petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the same. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader. In the nature of the order I propose to pass, I do not think it necessary to issue notice to the 4th respondent. In the facts and W.P.(C) No. 147/2008(P) -2- circumstances of the case, there would be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE jp