IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19034 of 2011 RANJIT SINGH @ RANJIT KUMAR SINGH son of Shyama Singh, resident of village-Chak Kanchanpur, P.S.-Bidupur, District- Vaishali Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.6.2011. Heard Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.N.K.Khare, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Trial No.656 of 2011 arising out of Bidupur P.S. Case No.249 of 2009 for the offences under sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, has prayed for grant of bail. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that nothing was recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner and he is rotting in jail since 8.10.2010. It was further submitted that from conscious possession of co-accused, Shiv Chandra Singh @ Shibhu two cartridges were recovered on whose confession name of the petitioner transpired, has been granted bail by this court on 30.11.2009 vide Cr. Misc. No.41092 of 2009. In view of nature of accusation and period of custody as well as the fact that co-accused on whose confession the petitioner was made accused has been granted bail, there is no reason to deny the prayer for bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Ashok Bhan, Judicial 2 Magistrate, Ist Class, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Trial No.656 of 2011 arising out of Bidupur P.S. Case No.249 of 2009 on the condition that on each and every date during trial the petitioner shall remain physically present before the trial court failing which his bail bond shall stand automatically cancelled. However, in special exigency, with prior permission of the trial court, the petitioner can remain absent on a particular date. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)