IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 6TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 15TH BHADRA 1929 RP.No. 800 of 2007() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN CRP.184/2002 Dated 26/06/2007 .................... : RESPONDENT: ---------------------------- PEEDIKAKANDI MURALI, S/O.KUMARAN, KALANTHINKUNNU, AMSOM AND DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE (DISTT). BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP ANTONY CHACKO RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER: ------------------------ EDAVALATH KAITHAL KUNHABDULLA, S/O.MAMEE HAJI, KUTTADI AMSOM, URATH DESOM, BADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DIST. BY ADV. SRI.BINDU SASTHAMANGALAM THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.B. KOSHY & K.P.BALACHANDRAN, JJ. -------------------------------------- R.P. No. 800/2007 in C.R.P.No.184/2002 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of September, 2007 Order Koshy,J. This petition for review is filed for producing additional documents. All the documents produced except Annexure R 18 to 22 were documents available prior to the passing of the order. Those are letters sent by the petitioner to the Corporation and their replies. That will not, in any way, affect the merits of the case. Further, the Apex Court decision cited by the petitioner was already considered by this Court in paragraph 8 of the judgment under review. A review petition cannot be equated to a petition for re-hearing of the matter or an appeal proceedings or as a revision proceedings. All the points urged by the petitioner was considered. There is no merit in the review petitioner and it is dismissed. J.B.KOSHY JUDGE K.P.BALACHANDRAN JUDGE vaa M.F.A..No. 2 J.B. KOSHY AND K.P.BALACHANDRAN,JJ. -------------------------- R.P.No.800/2007 in in C.R.P.No.184/2002 -------------------------- Order Dated:6th September, 2007