IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. J U D G M E N T Roop Chand Vs. Amar Chand S.B. CIVIL SECOND APPEAL No.127/1993 against the judgment & decree dated dated 19.3.1993 passed by the ADJ No.1, Ajmer in Civil Appeal No.456/1986. Date of Judgment :: May 11, 2006 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Sunil Samdariya for the appellant-defendant. Mr. Gajanand Misra Manav for the respondent-plaintiff. BY THE COURT: Learned counsel for the appellant submits that his client has not given latest instructions in the matter to argue the appeal but orally he has conveyed that since the tenant-appellant has purchased the suit premises from the landlord he would not press the appeal. Learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent is not in a position to controvert this position as he also does not have the latest instructions from his client. In view of this, this appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. (Dr.VINEET KOTHARI),J. VS/