IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8397 of 2004 1. NARAYANI PRASAD SON OF LATE BADRI NARAIN LAL, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- LASGARIGANJ, P.S. SASARAM, DISTRICT- ROHTAS. 2. PANDEY MUKTI NATH SON OF LATE PANDEY SIDHNATH, RESIEDENT OF MOHALLA- KATHATOLI, P.S. SASARAM, DISTRICT- ROHTAS. 3. RAJENDRA PRASAD SON OF SRI JHULAN PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- GHOLAXNI P.S. SASARAM, DISTRICT- ROHTAS. 4. NASIB AHMAD SON OF LATE LATIF AHMAD, RESIDENT OF BHABUA TOWN, P.S. BHABUA, DISTRICT- KAIMUR. 5. MAHESH KUMAR PANDEY SON OF LATE AWADH BIHARI PANDEY, RESIDENT OF BHABUA TOWN, P.S. BHABUA, DITRICT- KAIMUR. 6. PRADIP KUMAR SON OF SRI MUNESHWAR LALL, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- BHABUA TOWN, P.S. BHABUA, DISTRICT- KAIMUR. .. PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE SPECIAL SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, ROHTAS THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN. 5. DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, KAIMUR, BHABUA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN. 6. MANAGING DIRECTOR, DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, ROHTAS. 7. MANAGING DIRECTOR, DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, KAIMUR. …. RESPONDENTS. ----------- 5. 22.06.2011. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The instant writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to treat the petitioners as full fledged Government servants as per the guidelines of D.R.D.A. Administration, 1999 and for connected reliefs. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that similar orders have been passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 14329 of 2009 and C.W.J.C. No. 649 of 2010 relating to D.R.D.A., Chapra and Nalanda respectively. He further submits that in view of these 2 orders passed the case of the petitioners also be disposed of in the same light. Despite final indulgence granted to the State as far back as in May, 2007, no counter affidavit till date has been filed on its behalf. As such the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file fresh representations and bring the aforesaid orders of this Court to the notice of the Deputy Development Commissioner and District Magistrate, Rohtas within a period of one month hereof and if such representations are filed the same shall be disposed of within a further period of five months thereafter by reasoned orders. The writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. Ibrar/- ( Vikash Jain, J)