^si?>ofc..---". p.R.No...-—""";7'^:3;'%fc.'C^.t p,esent9dbv^!^^r--";_^ dated. 35'B^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO^S^/2005 Petitioner SingSgBench -^" :[1] Satish Parganiha S/o -Late Shari Bhagvan Singh , Aged- about 23 year, R/P -ViUage Pirada, Post-Bhibhori Tah.- Berla Dist-Durg (C.G.) Versus RespQndents 1. ^' The State of Chhattisgarh, '' Through, the Secretary School Education Department D.S.K. . Bhawan,Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Union of India , Human Resorses Department, New Delhi 3. The District Education Officer Bemetra, Dist: Durg-(C.G.) 4. The Block EducaUon Officer Berla, Tah.-Beria, Dist: Durg-fC.G.) .,'''• .^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE^226_^'227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITE IN NATURE OF AMUS. CERTIORARI PROHABITAION. etc. AND / OR POR ORDERAND / OR DIECTION / DIRECTIONS IN NATURE OFWRrT. 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS: •r As per title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPQNDENTS: As per titie. PARTICULARS OF THE ORDERSAGAINST WHICH THE PETITION 18 BEING FILED : ' ' This petition is preferred against the order / direction issued by the respondent no.l whereby the respondents have restncted fhe implementation of an order / direction issued by the erstwhile state ^ of Madhya Pradesh for compassionate appointment mstead of they |have issued a new order in contravention of and detrimerital to the interest of the rule regarding compassionaLte appomtment. The /order bearing No.7-4 / 2002 / 1-3 dated 10/06/2003. The copy of the said order is annexed as 'Anneinu-e P-l'. Besides this petition is preferred against the order issued by the same authority bearing di4te..SiE..>i; XI-HC-22, sn^T-^i f^-ti+'ail^i ^<-n^i ^il^a "c-? ^ .^ 'Sttf ••i|i'ilisi<l,';8'tfl'y'iS) l^<ait)^ ^. III^K gffli% Wi, 2oa ^^l' :;. ,:... 3iRRt?<aiw:'gfe' :3.1;.^i0&<' .:.:^'''.-' Stiri Vjjay:peshmykh,. pounsei •*l«i<-j<il-lWTaf S:'fSiZt <fawi< ^? Slfellt 311^1 forltiepetittoner. Shn VivekShafma, Pa(lelLau|^er,_forth&State. , ^eara: : : ;.: '.^. ''l:;;.1-..' ..•' '. •.;^ • . '' '. ,:1 -'•'- l^am^ coi^el )brthe.petit|<OTersubrnit&that^ who was .vwrking; as Asslstant-lea^her ;ln''Education Departtnent,, aied ,Qn 9/5/2(ai00 duringtheservioeperioda^dthe^^^ ai^ointment-WhiclTwasdertied.tti^furthersubmi^ bearing W,P./'NS;t322/20Q2Ji^lvi^g tlw same questkm^orsteis^te passed -by \ss Court on 20/1Z/2p0|5. . He prays ttiat similai' OrclerS may be passed in this cas^ also. ; Learned counsel for (he SN atates at -theState .cifGhhattisgarii jfe does not dispute the "above .{aot and hastaKenade.cisiDntooonsKler.thecases ;oFdeDenaahts efft se.smployees8|^iaiedowo^^ ^aGQOEdEH^'witft^^.Ri^^pretal^i^tthattime. .,:^^ ^ : ^ '- ' ^ . :' K ^' ^n;<?i^jQflh^;sut»iissi6ns^a^ ^rtjes,l^hout;e)q9res®inganytepiriijan^on ffie.merits ofthe^ase, In ttie opiniQn: yfyhis^<^i^^ds.,ofjustjoewiltbe^rv^;tfadii^ion:is.s^ i©t3t^i^a!^Et^fMe^toQt^^e6t|cNiT^%<»nsi^ :^he~p^onep»^ccoR:^^w hth^pcdic^St^te^ at tl !tlrae ctf (teatti of hfs Tather 'l^the ^it!orieFftiurKl'!etigilpe,:app6m ^rfy aspo^ibleonor betore30nA^I, 20Q6 Thepetitionerisatsodire render due co-operation to the a|jthonties. It is maae clear-that tf.any grievancestHI rematps, the petitioR^ may availthe remedya\ailable un law iricluding filingof-the petition bel Withthe aforesaid obsenatic Certified copy as per rules.' Copy to the State couftsel, ordettothe respondentsf6reampl.iE iorethisCourt.. ' - ins, (hls petition standsdisposedof. who will be obliged to communicate e nce. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judtfe t—-' •I" '^.