IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 3RD SEPTEMBER 2010 / 12TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 25039 of 2010(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JAYACHANDRAN.K.E., C ONTRACTOR, KAPRAKKATTU HOUSE, OKKAL P.O., PERUMBAVOOR-VIA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, JALABHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033. 2. THE FINANCE MANAGER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, KWA, JALABHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 033. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, K.W.A., P.H.DIVISION, THIRSSUR, PIN-680 020. 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, K.W.A., P.H.SUB DIVISION, GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 101. 5. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, K.W.A., P.H.SECTION, GURUVAYOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 101. MR.M.DINESH, STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.25039 of 2010 (D) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 3rd day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, pursuant to the contract work awarded to him, he executed Ext.P1 agreement with the respondents. On that basis, the work was executed for an amount of Rs.10,48,190/-. It is stated that despite having executed the work, which was found to be satisfactory, and sanctioned payments, the amount was not disbursed to him. It is with this grievance, this writ petition has been filed. 2. During the course of the submission, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents raised a contention that the work executed by the petitioner was not in terms of the work order. Though this allegation is denied by the petitioner, having regard to this controversy, I feel it is only appropriate that the 3rd respondent should consider Ext.P5 representation made by the petitioner for payment and pass orders thereon. This the 3rd respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within WP(C) No.25039/2010 -2- six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg