1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5705 OF 2006 Paranjape Schemes (Constructions) Pvt. Ltd. .. Petitioner. Vs. Tejkumar Bhandari .. Respondent. Smt.Swati Deshpande for the petitioner. Mr.S.N.Chandrachud for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2006 DATED : 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2006 DATED : 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2006 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent. 2. The petitioner has impugned the order dated 27.6.2006 passed on the application below Exhibit-49 by which the respondent-plaintiff is permitted to adduce oral evidence to prove the documents in question. This being an interlocutory order. Ms.Deshpande, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if all the contentions are kept open to be raised in further proceedings after disposal of the suit. Mr.Chandrachud, learned counsel for the respondents has no objection for allowing the petitioner to challenge the impugned order in further proceedings, as prayed for. In the circumstances I pass the 2 2 2 following order: . The writ petition is disposed of not pressed. All contentions are kept open to be raised in further proceedings after disposal of the suit. The hearing of the suit is expeditied. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)