IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 10924 of 2009 Between: A.Laxmaiah, S/o. Durgaiah, R/o. Kolcharam Post & M, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P.S.R.T.C, rep by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Medak Region, at Sangareddy. 3 The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Gajwel-Pragnapoor, Medak District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in terminating the services of the petitioner without holding any enquiry and by attaching Stigma vide ProcNo.02/95 (13)/2008-GPP, Dt: 10-11-2008, which was confirmed by the 2nd respondent vide Proc. No.PA/20(SA)/2008-RM;MR, dt. 22-4-2009 as high handed and arbitrary action, without jurisdiction, contrary to APSRTC Regulations against to the principles of natural justice and as such liable to be set aside in the interst of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.M.SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.B.G.UMA DEVI The Court made the following : O R D E R: The learned counsel for the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation has brought to my notice that the Regional Manager of the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Medak Region, Sanga Reddy District has considered and passed orders on 09.06.2009, advising the writ petitioner to report to Depot Manager immediately. In view of this order passed on 09.06.2009 by the Regional Manager, no further orders are needed to be passed in this writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, but, however, without costs. ______________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO J., Dt.11.06.2009 tjs