1 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2484/2007 (Meenu Bhardwaj vs. Sate of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of order : May 07, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.H.K.Jain, for the petitioner. Mr.N.M.Lodha, Addl. Advocate General for respondent State. Mr.Tarun Joshi, for respondent RPSC. Issue notice. Mr.N.M.Lodha, Additional Advocate General and Mr.Tarun Joshi accept notices for respondents State and RPSC respectively. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is heard and being decided at the admission stage. Learned Additional Advocate General and the counsel appearing for the RPSC submit that the identical controversy came to be considered by this Court in Udai Singh vs. State of Rajasthan, S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2145/2005, which came to be decided vide order dt. 4.12.2006. While dismissing the writ petition, this Court held that there is no provision for re- evaluating the answer-sheets, which has been affirmed by the Division Bench of this Court. In this view of the matter I do not 2 find any merit in the writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in the light of decision of this Court in Udai Singh vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (supra). There shall be no order as to costs. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-