IN THE HIGH COURT OFJyDICATURE. AT - BILASPUR C.G. WRIT PETITION No.S"7~2 /2006 PETITIONER /4.^^^ ^^ SMT. NEERA SAHUI AGED-26YEARS WIFE OF SHRI RATHRAM SAHU . ^•^•' .^"\^' o.^ ^yy >&• RESPONDENTS POSTED AS - SHIKSHA KARMI VARG - III AT - GOVT. PRIK4ARYSCHOOL, DONDRO BLOCK & DISn. - KORBA (C.G.) R/0 Q. N0. 963 / 5 - A, BALCO NAGAR, KORBA, DISTRtCT - KORBA (C. G.) VERSUS 1. STATE OF CHHAmSGARH THROUGH -THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHEDULE TRIBE& SHEDULE CASTE, MANTRALAYA O. K. S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR 2. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZtLA PANCHAYAT, KORBA DISTRICT - KORBA (C. G.) 3. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, JANPAD PANCHAYAT, KORBA, DISTRICT - KORBA (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE - 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF tMIANDAMUS. PROHIBmON. .SUITABLE DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDEROR ORDERS ETC. .<-.'>t\ ^.y/^ r XI-HC-22 75T ^i|t|j^<<, e;Til<H<i<o, i««Yii«>i<. an^r^n R-li.'ti aii^r aiira ^rfta Gowri ^ •^. <*.' ^ 3TI^[ -q^r^ *<11MI a)t)l<=b ^B^ST' 17 siit^r ^Rnwaft^ 24.1-2006 Shri RavishVerma, counsel Shri S.P. Kale, Govt. Advocate for the petitioner. |te for the State of Chhattisgarh. Heard. Learned counsel for the pe(:itioner transferred vide Annexure-P/2. He| the said transfer order the petitior|er Copy of joining report is Annexur^- dated 9-12-2005 (Annexure-P/1) been cancelled. It is pointed oul] petitioner has not submitted any Learned counsel for the petitioner may bedirected to mak4 competent authorities and ifsuch be considered and decided. Having considered and w| merits of the case, in the opinioti served if a direction is given representation raising her grievai c;hN^'4li iTRcff ^ t^^ {pii^K ^siPgiTsn^r submits that the petitioner was further .submits that in compliance of ior|er has joined at her transferred place. r4-P/3. He aiso submits that vide order |he transfer order (Annexure.P/2) has that before filing of this petition the re|j>resentation before authorities. the respondents along with a cop'j?of the petition and thisorder, within a period of two weeks frpm today, the competent authority of the re: own merits in accordance with law ^nd on such representation being filed, (pondents shall decide the same on its as eariy as possible preferably within a period oftwo months from the dgtejof receipt ofthe representation. Learned counsel for the p not been relieved. He prays that th ^titioner submits that the petitioner has ^ petitioner may be allowed to continue. In view of the above submj petitloner, it is directed that if the p| be allowed to continue till the repr^ With the aforesaid observati Consequently M.(W.).P.No. Certified copy as per rutes. itate submits that for the present the a representation before the concerned representation is made, the same shall thout expressing any opinion on the of this Court, ends of justice witl be o the petitioner to make a detailed ces before the competent authority of fssion made by learned counsel for the letitioner has not been relieved, she may tentation is decided. jons, this petition stands disposed of. P02/2006 also stends disposed of. Sd'- Fakhruddin Judge [1ft^^fe^