IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.44 of 2009 DILIP KUMAR GUPTA @ DILIP KUMAR, SON OF RAM CHANDRA PRASAD GUPTA, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA MAHBOOB TOLA, P.S. K.HAT, DISTRICT PURNEA ……..PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PURNEA 3. RAM BILASH SINGH SON OF NOT KNOWN, INCHARGE POLICE OFFICER OF K.HAT POLICE STATION, PURNEA 4. BANIBRAT DEY SON OF ADHIR CHANDRA DEY, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA BIBEKANAND COLONY, P.S. K.HAT, DISTRICT PURNEA 5. DIWAKAR CHOUDHARY SON OF KRISHNA NANDAN CHAUDHARY, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA RAJNI CHOWK, P.S. K. HAT, DISTRICT PURNEA 6. HEERALAL YADAV SON OF RANJEET YADAV, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA PROFESSOR COLONY, RAM BAG, P.S. SADAR, DISTRICT PURNEA …….RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 10.02.2009 It is the assertion of the petitioner that he is being threatened dispossession from the tenanted premises by the Officer Incharge of Khazanchi Hat Police Station at the instance of the landlords. Having heard Mr. Baidyanath Thakur for the petitioner, A.C. to G.P.I for the State and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the petitioner shall be well advised to approach respondent no.2, the Superintendent of Police, Purnea for the redressal of his grievance. Needless to state that in case petitioner approaches respondent no.2, appropriate action in accordance with law shall be taken without unnecessary delay. It is made clear that I have not expressed any opinion in regard to the claim made by the petitioner and that shall be considered by respondent no.2 in accordance with law. Application stands disposed off with the observation aforesaid. Narendra/ (Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, ACJ.)