IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14916 of 2005 SUNITA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5. 24.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. To the extent that the petitioner claims regularization on the basis of appointment as daily wager, this Court finds no merit in the writ application inasmuch as on her own showing her initial induction as daily wager was contrary to law and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution. In any event a daily wager holds no post so as to claim regularization. However, the contention of the petitioner of victimization even in her status as daily wager for having approached this Court in the present writ application appeals to this Court. Annexure-6 to I.A. No. 122 of 2006 issued by the Respondents during the pendency of the writ application deprives her of the status of daily wager also. The nature and tenor of the order satisfies this Court that the petitioner has been subjected to victimization for having moved this Court for appropriate relief. The counter affidavit on behalf of the Respondents to the Interlocutory application does not deny the status of the petitioner as a daily wager. It does not plead that it has no need for daily wagers. In that view of the matter, this writ application has to be allowed to the extent only that the order dated 27.11.2005 is, accordingly, set aside. The petitioner stands restored as a daily wager in accordance with law. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)