1 IN THE HGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO.1091/2010 (Arun Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of Order : 03.08.2010 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. T.R.S. Sodha, for the petitioners. Mr. Anil Joshi, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. In this misc. petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioners are challenging the FIR No.18/2010 registered at Police Station Begu District Chittorgarh dated 15.1.2010 upon the complaint filed by the complainant Shivlal against two persons Ramlal and Prakash. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the FIR may be quashed because the names of the petitioners are not appearing in the FIR nor there is any allegation against the petitioners in the FIR. In support of his arguments learned counsel for the petitioners has invited the attention of this Court towards the judgment reported in AIR 2009 SCW 3294 and AIR 2009 SCW 1836. I have perused the FIR and gone through the judgments cited by learned counsel for the petitioners. It is very 2 strange that the petitioners are making prayer for quashing of the FIR on the ground that they are not named in the FIR so also there is no allegation against them in the FIR. If names of the petitioners are not mentioned in the FIR and there is no allegation against them then there is no question to challenge the FIR by those persons whose names are not appearing in the FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in pursuance of the said FIR, the police is harassing the petitioners. It is very strange that how police can harass the persons whose names are not appearing in the FIR nor there is any allegations against them in the FIR. If in the investigation something is found by the Investigating Officer, then it is the duty of the investigating officer to investigate the matter. For which, FIR cannot be quashed. Further, the judgments cited by learned counsel for the petitioners depend upon altogether different facts. Therefore, no ground is made out to interfere in this misc. petition. Hence, this misc. petition is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J arun