CR No. 562 of 2010(O&M) Gram Panchayat village Nangal Jattan vs. Sh.Mehandi Hassan and others Present: Mr.Vikas Bahl, Advocate for the petitioner. *** Learned counsel states that even though the impugned order closing the evidence of the Gram Panchayat-defendant cannot be called unjustified yet the petitioner seeks only one opportunity to lead its entire evidence at its own responsibility and considering the fact that the property in dispute is public property, it would be in the interest of justice to allow the petitioner this one opportunity. Further states that the matter is now fixed for 04.03.20910. In my opinion the interest of justice would be met if the petitioner is allowed one effective opportunity to lead its entire evidence at its own responsibility without seeking any assistance from the court . This would be subject to costs of Rs. 10,000/- to be paid by the petitioner by way of demand draft in favour of respondents No. 1 and 2 on the date fixed which would be a pre-condition for the petitioner to lead its evidence. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE February 04, 2010 sunita