IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18014 of 2010 SMT.KRISHNA DEVI KRISHNA DEVI, WIFE OF LATE RAM NATH SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHAKHARI RAM P.O. BHANBOHARA, P.S. MAHUA, DISTRICT VAISHALI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE HOME SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIATE, PATNA. 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL (PRISON) GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE JAIL SUPERNTENDENT OF CENTRAL JAIL, BEUR, PATNA. ----------- 02. 09.11.2010 As prayed for learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the nomenclature of the respondent no. 2. Heard the parties. The grievance of the petitioner is that after the death of her husband in harness while working as Jail Constable at Central Jail Beur, Patna on 26th of April 2009, petitioner received the death-cum-retiral dues to the tune of Rs. 5,97,000/- as per bank drafts vide Annexure- 4 series, however, she could not know the what amount she is paid against which head in absence of any forwarding letter mentioning the details of such payment. It is further submitted that the pension has not been fixed as yet with the result petitioner is not receiving the pension nor the provisional pension till final pension is sanctioned as paid. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that petitioner was paid 100 per cent of the group insurance amount to the tune of Rs. 1,49,951/- whereas she was entitled to receive only 50 per cent i.e. Rs. 74,976/- payable to her as mentioned in the nomination paper submitted by the husband of the petitioner vide Annexure- 5. Petitioner was accordingly requested to refund back the 50 percent of the amount. In reply learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on perusal of the Annexure- 6 the affidavit sworn by the second son of the first wife of the deceased employee, it would appear that he has received the money. Notwithstanding the above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application with regard to the payment of pension as also other claims admissible to her after knowing the details of the payment made to her as per Annexure- 4 series, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 2 detailing the unpaid claims if any. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled to enable her to receive the admitted unpaid claims with interest permissible under the rules/extent instruction of the State Government. The writ applications stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)