^. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. l °> ^0/2005 ^ ^ PETITIONER ^ Dr. Smt Jaya Agrawal, W/o. Dr. K.K. Agrawal, R/o. R-l, Vinobanagar, Behind Gayatri Mandir, Bilaspur, Working as .^^^^ Assistant Professor, Commerce a...<"">^"f"iSS^*"*;w^* Government Girls P.G. CoUege ^^^^ c^'€' Lmk Road'Bilaspur (C-G-) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ 1. ^ 2. 5, State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Higher Education Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G,) Commissioner Higher Education Directorate, Government Science CoUege Premises, Raipur, ^c^) -President Public Service Commission, Office at Raipur (c ^) / /t. Pruicipal Government Girls PjQ. CoUege, Bilaspur. ^C'h) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/ CERTIORARI, ETC. OR DIRECTION / ORDER IN THE LIKE NATUREETC. Xt-HC-78 \j^q ^l^lrt^, UtDxi^Kc, RlrtW^ <ii*ioi^»m^ W1200 3TT^^T<PTf^TT^ PiaiTSTI^STaFIFP 3TT^?T q?q? (^clij^) ?^TW^Tf^T31T^$T ^7.06.200T !V!r. Kishore Bhaduri, iearr(ad counse! forthe petitioner. IVlr. Arun Sao, learned D| Chhattisgarh / respondents 1, 2 None appears for responcj <pi<<To4l<i +ii*<cl)V^rn5»<£l^RI^IK ^srf^Ton^^r k. Govemment Advocate for the State of M. lent No.3. Learned counse! for the fretitioner submits that the main grievance of the petitioner is that his seniot-jty shouid be considered from the date of his appointment and after co|nsidering the same, the gradation !ist Annexure P~9 may be corrected.l Learned counsel for th^ present, this petition may be di petitioner further submits that for the Iposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to ]. fiie a detailed representation. |)efore the concerned authority and the concerned authority may be dir^cted to decide the representation wtthin the stipulated period granted by \ This iimited prayer made [his Court. |3y iearned counse! for the petitioner is not opposed by the State counsel. Consequently, the prayerps ailowed. The petitioner is directed|to fite a detailed representation along with the copy of this writ petition anc| the certified copy of this order before the concerned authority within a pej representation is filed, the conc|emed authority shal! dedde the same as early as possible preferabiy witl] filing of the representation by with law. With the aforesaid obser^ of. riod of 3 weeks from today and jf such a iin a period of 3 months from the date of sassing a reasoned order in accordance fatlons the petition stands finally dlsposed XI-HC-78 WTOTg^'n^ \Jw< ^IAjlrt^, ^TTltl<l<?, R^W^ V3f 17^/OS^ 3TT^$T q^P (^clijcl^) ^200 3n^^TcpTf^Tf<p ^n3?^T9?WP ^ Sarma There shall be no orders ^s Consequentiy, I.A.No.37Q9 stand disposed. Certified copy as per rule^ <r»i<ifcl)<nvi+ii4ioT^"I^^£l^fa^K ?l?3lf^T^9T to costs. of 2005 and M.(W).P.No.1551 of 2005 Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge