(^ SnBlBBwwK BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR IC.ai CONTEMFT CASE (C) N0. 1 3-3/ 2011 APPLICANT: RESPONDENTS J^gdish Kumar Dhruv, S/o Amar Singh Dhruv, Aged about 22 years^ Village Thakurpali Block Bagbahra District Mahasamund (C.G) VERSUS R.P.STyagi Collector Korba. District Korba(C.G) ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 10/3/11 PASSED IN W.P. (S|. 1311/2011 r< Tr 3?^^ f^iW3:(T^T 9h^ich ^rff^ ^*> pl^ -$^:- -^^ ^w\^^. ^w^o. ^w^y S7T^T,lpT^ ^...C.p..^l.7..?...i..^ ^ \ -z.? WWTf^^lch 'l^^ar' ^TT^T ^RTT8?R ^Tf^T 8B: HON*BLB 8HRI MANIHDRJ&L MOHAN SHRIVASTAVAtfy. 14.7.2011 coulnsel fbe thle leartied Shri Soinkant Venna, Shri Pawaii Kesharwaai, Leamed counsel for direction was issued to the grievaace of fhe petitioner aad a period of two weeks froin order. He subndts fhat fhe passed axi order on 17,6.2011,1 fhe Court has not been compUe^l On fhe other haad, submits that ia compUaace o^ have already been passed by tit|i there has been some delay ia which was not iatentional, but | amongst fhe State ftuictionariejs. m passiag fhe order may be dropped. Considering fhe the parties aad fhe reply filed o|n not iaclmed to proceed further| fhe respondent is therefore, dis^] ConsequenUy, fhe petitio^i subinisslons cni^^l 'RTR^ff ^ 'feT^t <f^^l< '^'^Tf^m ^TT^ for the petitioner. ^ounsel for the respondent. petitioner subinits fhat a respondent to look mto the PQ.QS an appropriate order wifhin date of receipt of copy of fhe r^spondent though has belatedly annexure R/1 and fhe order of wifh. counsel for the respondent Court order, necessaiy orders f^ie respondent on 17.6,2011 aad d^cidmig fhe case of the petitioner, jonly caused due to coordiaation aad has prayed that fhe delay cojadoned and proceediags may be made by leanxed counsel for behalfoffhe respondent, I am ia fhe matter. The rule agaiast Aai^ed. i is iinally disposed of "—"s8"'"""'