nm 3478/10 & 13/11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION 3478/2020 IN CEXA 198/2006 M/s Shandar Products APPLICANT VS. Commissioner of Central Excise , Mumbai-IV RESPONDENT WITH NOTICE OF MOTION 13/2011 IN CEXA 196/2006 M/s Sunsuk Industries APPLICANT VS. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-IV RESPONDENT Mr.V.Sridharan a/w Mr.Jas Sanghvi i/b PDS Legal for Applicant /Appellant Mr.Pradeep Jetly for respondent CORAM- J.P.DEVADHAR ,AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATE - 20TH JANUARY,2011. P.C. . These twoappeals filed against the order of CESTAT were admitted on 18/1/2007. By the impugned order the CESTAT had remanded the matter for denovo adjudication . nm 3478/10 & 13/11 2 For all these years no steps were taken to re-adjudicate the matter as per the direction of the Tribunal. However, in the absence of stay, it appears that , now the matter is being taken up for re-adjudication . In the circumstances both the Notices of Motion are allowed by staying the operation of the order of CESTAT dated 21/2/2006. Both the Notices of Motion are disposed of. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)