fyfje^ l^ CFO(iOiil571'35 S^i^y^ '^^_1)^£J ^w?ts B?"cs (n-n IN THE HIGH COURT~0~E-HBDHY% PRftDESH AT JABALFUR; Isc. Petition ito. f ^ ' /1987 . i.; ^^ PETITIONER &15 Misc Smt. Pushpa ShuKla, wlfe of Shri Kishore Kumar Shukla, aged about 32 years, Matron, Government Girls Post Graduate College, Bilaspur. (M.P.2. V S R :S RESPONDENTS isy -.W lu^,...£C:J.:^^ f> "><>n..iAvA.-fc/).<L ;A-('|^^ '-"' v^: ^•^•T.' h^\^'\^v. ^-"'^' rt ^A !.- 1. The State of Madhya Pradesh,Through i, '>'"' The Secretary, Education Department, Colle^iate Branch, Madhya Praaesh, Bhopal. .2. The Deputy Director of Education, Collegiate Branch, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal. •t--3. The enncipal, Government Girls Post Graduate College, Bj_laspur(MP) '•ih- *i • Goiu.tn j.SSt6ti&r, Coll%^t<xr6-&i-'--*x.^ o^- ^^ ^•.•l-tC{(hi"eH,rtt.^ i'>>l».c?<fct. ^v> PETITT-ON UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE COKSTITUTION / OF.JNDI& FOR ISSUANCE OF HRIT IN 1T4E NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS OR MiX OTHER MRIT OR:J"[RITS, ' ORDER OR ORE'ESS, D3RECTI.OI.: OR SIHECTIOIIS. .' ^ .,,'S .'-^••^- s.Va s- <<"":31'<» ^r^ 1b »^IA< HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA.J. : Writ Petition (S»No.1028/2005 PETITIONER Smt. Pushpa Shukla RESPONDENTS Versus < State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. ORDER POST ON^JUNE.2010 Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^f s •^-^ .^ ^" '^-^9S ^' ^^ ! "•-ii.«.,., HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA.J. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Writ Petition (St No.1028/2005 Smt. Pushpa Shukla Versus State of Madhya Pradesh 85 Ors. Appearance: Shri Awadh Tripathi, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Payasi, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (Passed on ^ .06.2010) 1. By this petidon, petitioner has sought quashing of orders dated 1.12.1986 (Annexure P-6), 6.12.1986 (Annexure P-7), 16.12.1986 (Annexure P-8), 20.1.1987 (Annexure P-9) & 15.1.1987 (Annexure P- 10). 2. During pendency of this pedtion, later on, a departmental enquiry was initiated and a punishment was imposed on the petitioner. Her suspension order was also revoked vide order dated 30.8.1990 and she was posted at Raipur. In the connected petition [(WP (S) 902/05)], petitioner challenged the order of imposition of penalty and prayed for several reliefs. Therefore, in view of subsequent events and order of this Court in the connected writ petition, nothing survives for consideration in so far as orders dated 1.12.1986 (Annexure P-6), 6.12.1986 (Annexure P-7), 16.12.1986 (Annexure P-8), 20.1.1987 (Annexure P-9) & 15.1.1987 (Annexure P-10) are concerned. 3. Pedtion is therefore finally disposed off. .-sdin ShrWast^a ^'"dm'*ss"'":- -