THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24146 of 2006 ORDER: In this Writ Petition, petitioner seeks a mandamus declaring the action of the respondent – Tahsildar, Kothapalli Mandal, Kurnool District, in not implementing order, dated 31.05.2006, passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kurnool, in Rc.B/936/2005, as illegal and arbitrary. Petitioner is a fair price shop dealer for distribution of essential commodities to the cardholders of Guvvalakuntla Village, Kothapalli Mandal, Kurnool District. On certain allegations, his authorisation was cancelled by the primary authority i.e. Revenue Divisional Officer, Kurnool, as such, he carried the matter in appeal, which in turn, was allowed by the appellate authority i.e. Joint Collector, Kurnool. In compliance of the orders passed by the Joint Collector, Kurnool, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kurnool, through order, dated 31.05.2006, requested the respondent to ensure compliance of the orders passed by the appellate authority. It is the grievance of the petitioner that in spite of allowing the appeal by the appellate authority and passing the order on 31.05.2006 by the primary authority, the respondent is not implementing the same. This Court by way of interim order, dated 20.11.2006, advised the respondent to implement the orders passed by the primary and appellate authorities, by restoring the authorisation to the petitioner. When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing for the respondent that as the respondent has already complied with the directions issued by the primary authority through order, dated 31.05.2006 in Rc.B/936/2005, supplies are being continued to the petitioner. In view of allowing the appeal by the Joint Collector, Kurnool, by setting aside the order of cancellation passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kurnool, there appears no reason for not restoring the authorisation to the petitioner. In any event, as it is stated that the authorization of the petitioner is being restored and the supplies are being continued, I deem it appropriate to direct the respondent to continue the supplies to him in view of restoration of his authorization. Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 29th SEPTEMBER, 2011. kvni