IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13820 of 2010 MITHU SINGH, son of Late Faudi Singh, resident of village- Parma,P.S.-Nardiganj,District-Nawada. .. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR .. Opp.Party ----------- 02/ 19-05-2010 Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution for the offences under Sections 304B, 498A, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, though petitioner is named as an accused in the FIR, being elder brother of the husband of the deceased, but in the whole FIR vide Annexure-1 the allegation of demand of dowry and torture is mainly against co-accused Rajiv Kumar @ Sarjan, the husband of the deceased and co-accused Sunil Singh, another Bhainsur of the deceased. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that except the fact that the petitioner has been named in the column of the accused, being Bhainsur of the deceased, but no specific role has been assigned against him for committing the crime in question and specific role has been assigned only against the husband of the deceased, and another Bhainsur, namely co- accused Sunil Singh. In that view of the matter, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today in Giriak P.S.Case No.191/2007, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)