IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16107 of 2011 Ritesh Kumar Modi @ Pintu Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 23.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Neither the petitioner is named in the first information report nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that on the basis of confessional statement made by the petitioner some mobile sets were recovered from the house of Nikky and Vikky who happen to be brothers-in-law of the petitioner. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent and seized mobiles are not stolen properties of this case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Ritesh Kumar Modi @ Pintu, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in Kotwali P.S. Case no. 3/2011. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)