IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23389 of 2010 OM PRAKASH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 09.07.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the petition. Petitioner is languishing in jail in connection with a case registered under Section 363, 364A I.P.C. It is alleged that one Suraj Prasad took the victim from the shop of the informant and subsequently ransom was demanded. Though petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. but during investigation it has come that from petitioner’s mobile ransom was demanded. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner got his mobile lost for which a case was lodged on 23.02.2010 though the occurrence has also taken place on 23.02.2010. It is further submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and a statement to that effect has been made in para 16 of the petition. Considering the fact that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner namely Om Prakash be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) 2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Gaya Kotwali P.S. Case No. 65 of 2010. It is made clear that if the petitioner fails to appear on three consecutive dates during trial or gets involved in any such kind of case, the Trial Court will be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)