cj ^ HSGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH. BiLASPUR CONTEMFT CASE (Civa!) N0.79of 2009 PET3TIONERS 1 •h0 Smt. Durga Chauhan, W/o Shri Harsingh Chauhan, aged about 52 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Kaurinbhata, District Rajnandgaon (CG) Smt. Sushila Netam, W/o Shri S.K. Netam, aged abput 47 years, Head Mistress, Govt. Pre-IVIiddie School Lakhofj, District Rajnandgaon (CG) Smt. Sarwari B6gum, W/o Shri Sheikh Jabbar Qureshi, aged about 56 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Boys Primary School Chowkhadlapara, .District Rajnandgaon (CG) Shri Suresh Kumar Nirmalkar, S/o Shri Sahasram Nirmaikar, Aged about 45 yfears, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Baatgaon, District Rajnandgaon (CG) Versiis Shri Nand Kumar Patel, Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur 2 Shri S.K. Bharadwaj, District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (CG) CONTESVIPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDSA Appearance: JVIr. Anup Majumdar, Counsel for the petitjoners. Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, Counsel forthe respondent. . ;_ ORAL ORDER (08.02.2010) RESPONDENTS ' .1 SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. CONTEMPT CASE (Civii} N0.79of 2009 ^ Heard. The petitioners have filed this petition for initiation of proceedings of contempt against the respondents for the alleged default committed by them in compiiance of the order dated 30.06.2008 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No.3093 of 2008. - This Court while disposing of the aforesaid writ petition on 30.06.2008 passed the following order: "4. !n view of the above stated submissions made by learned counsej for the parties, the writ petition Is disposed of in the same terms i.e., the petitioners are granted Jiberty to make a representation, if so advised, to consider the petitioners case, if they stand on the same footings as per order dated 24-8" 1992 by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, in O.A. No.2745 of 89 Madhukant Yadu (supra) and subsequentSy, confirmed by order dated 3-1-1994 passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.6892/93 and grant relief accordingiy." Mr. Anup Majumdar, learned counsei appearing for the petitioners submits that since the order dated 30.06.2008 was not complied by the respondents, therefore, the petitioners had to file this petition for initiation of proceedings of contempt. Replies on behalf of the respondents have been filed. A perusal of the contents of para 5 of both the replies would show that the representation of the petitloners has !f; ) '.• '•'r1^^, CONTEMPT CASE (Civil) N0.79of2009 ^' already been decided by the competent authority of the respondents on 12.03.2009 and a copy ofthesame has been supplied to the petitioners. The copies of the decision taken by the concerned authority on 12.03.2009 have a!so been annexed wlth the repiies as Annexure R-1. ]>e In the facts and circumstances, there appears to^a substantial compliance of the order passed by this Court. In view of the above, 1 am not inclined to proceed further in this matter. The petition has no merit. The same is liabie to be dismissed andis hereby dismissed. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge shyna