!/3 H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR DB: Hon'ble Shri Sunil Kumar Sinha & Hon'bie Shri Radhe Shyam Sharma. JJ. Writ Appeal No.285/2011 Appellants/ Petitioners 1. Non-ADpeliant Respondents 2. Vs. 1. M/s. Kumar Manglam Traders, Through Its Proprietor Koushal Kumar Agrawal, S/o. Shri Gopa! Agrawal, Aged about 31 years, R/o. Sadar Bazar, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. M/s. Aditya Traders, Through its proprietor Shri Gopai Agrawal, S/o. Shri Aged about years, R/o. Gaddi Chowk, Sadar Bazar, Raigarh, dfetrict Raigarh (CG) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Commercia! Tax, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) 2. Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest, Produce (T S D) Cooperative Federation Ltd., A-25, V.I.P. Estate Near V.i.P Ciub, Khamardih Shankar Nagar, Raipur (CG) Through Managing Director, 3. Managing Director, District Minor Forest Produce Cooperative union Ltd., Conservator of Forest, Bilaspur, (CG) 4. Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Vanijyik Kar Bhawan, Civii Lines, Raipur (CG) Present: Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, counsei for the appellants. Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawer for the State/respondents 1 & 3. ORAL ORDER (12.07.2011.) W.A-No. 285/2011 The followina order ofthe Court was passed bv Sunil Kumar Sjnha, J. Heardon I.A. No.01. This application has been filed for permission to file joint writ appea!. The application is allowed and the appellants are permitted file joint 'ppeal. Heard on I.A. No.2. This application has been filed for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned common order dated 01.10.2010. The application is allowed and the appellants are exempted from filing certified copy of impugned common order dated 01.10.2010. Heard on I.A. No.3, apptication for condonation of delay in filing the writ appea!. According to office report, the appeal is barred by 210 days of limitation. On due consideration of the submissions made by leamed counsel for the parties and the ground taken in the application, we are satisfied that the appe!!ants have shown sufficient cause for not filing the appeat in time and the delay in filing the appea! deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, I.A. No:3 is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. Learned counsel for the parties are a!so heard on admission. This appeal is directed against a common order dated 01.10.2010 passed in a bateh of writ petitions. Aga'nst the said common order, many writ appeals, including W.A. No.452/2010, were filed. It is stated at Bar that all the writ appeals Ti!ed against the common order have been dismissed by W.A. No. 285/2011 a Diviston Bench of this Court by a common judgment dated 19 ofApril, 2011. Leamed counse! for the appellants submits that this appeat may aiso be dismissed/disposed of in terms of the above common judgment dated 19th of Apri! 2011 passed in W.A. No.452/2010 and other connected writ appeals. In view of the above, the present writ appeal is dism'ssed in terms of the common judgment dated 19* of April 2011 passed in the above batch of writ appeals. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- R.S. SHABMA. Judge itnE