x kw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W WRIT PETITION N0. I O I L /2006 {’ Tilak Ram Patel, S/o- Shri Bagrai Patel, Aged about 50 years, Presently working as Sub-Jailor, District Jail- Raigarh,v Distt. Raigarh, L Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Deptt. of Home (Jail), D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. / 2. Director General of Police (Jail), Jail Headquarter, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Shri B.K. Neeraj, Presently working as Sub-Jailor, Sub Jail- Surajpur, Distt. Surguja, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE CERTIORARI ETC. WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, . ’ \ u g XI-HC—78 WW,WW,W3I mm g..c.».9.§£?ix.<’91.% .. m 20% WW(W) m wm Wm%w WA ammm Wwm V a:Wm 4-8-2006 Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, Govt Advocate for the State/respondents No.1 & 2, Mrs. Haméda Siddique, counsed far respondent N03. Heard. By the instant writ petition r Article 226/227 of the Constitution of india, the petitioner has challenged th transfer order dated 2342—2006 passed by respondent No.1 whereby the petitio er nae been transferred from District Jail: 4, . Raigarh to Sub Jail: Sukma. ‘ At the out set, learned cou sel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's children are studying at R igarh and therefore, the petitioner may be allowed to make a representation to espondent No.1 and respondent No.1 be directed to decide the same, to oh learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents No.1 & 2 has no o jection. Having heard learned counse for the parties, having regard to the facts ithout expressing any opinion on merit of counsel for the petitioner is just, fair and reasonable. Therefore, the . petit oner is allowed to make a detailed representation raising alt his grievan es annexing a copy of the writ petition to respondent No.1 within ten days fro today and respondent No.1 is directed to decide the representation within on month from the date of its receipt after considering the points raised by the p titioner, in an objective manner, on its own merits, in accordance with law. lnter and circumstances of the case and the case, the request made by lear order granted'earlier stands vacated. With the direction aforesaid, petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P.No.7 [2006 and l.A.No.3022I2DD6 also stand disposed of. Parties are entitled‘for certified copy of this order. r Sd/— L.C. Bhadoo Judge P.T.O. Some u e i n t i