IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.No.S^S"2,/06 E -S °^3 S iayiB. *< PETITIONER ^...-v- ^a'^"',-.':.^"1' ^•^^•'\3.^ ¥<• >.&»>* ft^- .6--'" ^^^••- .«••" 's^-""" € Preet Ram Sahu, S/o Shri Purushottam Saliu Aged about 46 Yrs. Multipurpose Health Worker, (wrongly mentioned as Malaria worker in impugned order) Presently posted at, Jeejamgaon, Primary Health Center, Kurud, DistrictDhamtari (C.G.), R/o Gram Chatoud, Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT <?" 1. StateofC.G. Through : Secretary, Health & Public Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. BIock Medical Officer, Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR I8SUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT, WRITS, ORDER. DIRECTIONS ETC. XI-HC-22 3^'qraicPT, CTTflu'is, Riditi^< sn^r ><;rei t|l*1WIS»»*tI^ ^.\^ ^^[^ fSl'b.d 'V^I- 200 3TI^T?RT ^•irasn^r st'NrotTliff s<i^i ewiWHfer °hi<<fa*n-( iiinT^'fe^iRfWK ^Tarf^Tsn^r 12-7-2006:- Shri Manish Sharma, Miss Dipali Pandey, Pan< advance copy. Heard both the counsel. The main grievance raisee that he is vvorking as Multipurposj Health Centre, Kurud, he has be^ order dated 29-6-2006 by res? Medical and Health Officer, Ja; been effected on the request of tt| Learned counsel. for the never made such a request and his own request and that is why| order itself that they are transf^ counsel for the petitioner further) may be allowed to make a detail rectifying this mistake to which objection. Having heard learned record, without expressing any made by learned counsei for thf therefore, She petitioner is allo^ along with copy of this petition If: days from today and.in turn, resj decide representation of the petij coun^el for the petitioner. Lawyer for the Sta :s, on s<tl by the petitioner in this writ petition is Health Worker at Jeejamgaon, Primary ^n transferred on his own expenses vide po|ident No.1 to Jashpur under the Chief jhpur considering that the transfer has petitioner submitted that the petitioner le has been transferred on the ground of it has been mentioned in the impugned rred on their own expenses. Learned submitted that, therefore, the petitioner 'd representation to respondent No.1 for sarned counsel for respondents has no coUnsel for the parties, having perused the ipinion on the merit of the case, prayer petitioner is just, fair and reasonable, red to make a detailed representation a respondent No.1 within a period of 10 londent No.1 is directed to consider and ioner within a period of 30 days from the (<^y^r) XI-HC-22 aii^rqir R-<i*3n^r SfiIfW N?Bfer Ban/t *<l*lctl a>*4i«n 3^ •<<1<11C1<(, OTflu'16, Rldiyy Sil^l 4;|c*l ^ 200 Rl'b.A date. of receipt of representation. with iaw. However, as the petitloner the petitioner whereas, no such the post where the petitioner is view of the above, effect and op< respect of the petitioner shal representation. With the direction aforesai( Consequently, M.(W.)P. N1 Parties are entitled for ceri 'Bi<<lCT<f1i ii*fciTfffe'i;l <Rf+<ii< ^sif^rsn^r in an^bjective manner, in accordance has been transferred on the request of |equest was made by the petitioner and ^orking is still lying vacant, therefore, in •ration of the impugned transfer order in remain stayed till the decision of the , She petition stands disposed of. .2603/2006 aiso stands disposed of. led copy of this order. i L.C.B"ii-®so judgis (<fl^^feir)