IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3041 of 2010 1. MAHESH YADAV 2. Satendar Yadav. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 17.03.2010 Heard Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, learned Senior Counsel, appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioners, who are father and son, are accused in a case instituted under section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Unfortunately the deceased Ganpati Yadav happens to be the full brother of petitioner no.1. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that at best petitioners can be said to be the last persons who have been seen with the deceased and there is no direct material to connect them with the offence in question. Be that as it may, in view of the fact that petitioner no. 1 happens to be full brother and petitioner no.2 happens to be nephew of the deceased, this Court is not inclined to accede to the prayer of the petitioners for grant of bail for the present. The prayer for bail is rejected for the present. However, they shall be at liberty to renew prayer for bail after six months from today if the trial is not concluded by that time. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J ) BTiwary/