IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 1ST OCTOBER 2010 / 9TH ASWINA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1088 of 2010(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.23832/2010 Dated 11/08/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- ABDUL NAZAR.P.V, S/O.ABOOBACKER, AGED 42 YEARS, PARAKKUZHIVALAPPIL HOUSE, KAPPOOR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. MOHANKUMAR, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD. 2. VASUDEVAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== Contempt Case (C).No. 1088 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 1st day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T On 27.9.2010 the learned Government Pleader submitted that the vehicle had been released as directed in Annexure A order. On that day, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to verify. When the matter came up today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is yet to receive instructions from the party and this contempt case may be closed recording the submission of the learned Government Pleader. Accordingly, this contempt case is closed recording the submission of the learned Government Pleader that the vehicle has been released to the petitioner as directed in Annexure A order. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge