IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 11241 of 2011-E. Decided on: 19th December, 2011. 1. Lekh Raj s/o Sh. Bajir Chand, R/O village Karahpura, Post Office Dhaloon, Tehsil and Distt. Kangra, H.P. presently working as Revenue Chowkidar in Patwar Circle Dhaloon, Tehsil & Distt. Kangra, H.P. 2. Sita Rams/o Sh. Dule Ram, R/O village Thana Khas, Post Office Serathana, Tehsil and Distt. Kangra, H.P. presently working as Revenue Chowkidar in Patwar Circle Dhaloon & Rounkher, Tehsil & Distt. Kangra, H.P. 3. Chuni Lal s/o Sh. Chuharu Ram, R/O village Ghannaa, Post Office Bagli, Tehsil Dharamshala, Distt. Kangra, H.P. presently working as Revenue Chowkidar in Patwar Circle Bagli, Tehsil Dharamshala, Distt. Kangra, H.P. 4. Bhadar Ram s/o Sh. Jharu Ram, R/O village and Post Office Mumta, Tehsil and Distt. Kangra, H.P. presently working as Revenue Chowkidar in Patwar Circle Mumta, Tehsil & Distt. Kangra, H.P. 5. Smt. Koshayla d/o Sh. Ranjeet, R/O village and Post OfficeSohaura, Tehsil and Distt. Kangra, H.P. presently working as Revenue Chowkidar in Patwar Circle Abdullapur, Tehsil & Distt. Kangra, H.P. 6. Roop Lal s/o Sh. Bishan Dass , R/O village Rehar, Post Office Chandrot, Tehsil Baroh Distt. Kangra, H.P. presently working as Revenue Chowkidar in Patwar Circle Har II, Tehsil Baroh, Distt. Kangra, H.P. … Petitioners. Versus 1. State of H.P. through its Principal Secretary (Revenue) to the Government of H.P. Shimla-2. 2. Deputy Commissioner, Kangra at Dharamshala, Distt. Kangra, H.P. … Respondents. 2 Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners are revenue Chowkidars. They are aggrieved since they have not been granted the daily waged status in terms of the policy dated 27.2.2004 and subsequent policy. There will be a direction to the second respondent to look into the matter and take appropriate action in terms of the policy within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner concerned before the second respondent. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 19th December, 2011. (Justice Dev Darshan Sud), (tr) Judge. 3