IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.736 of 2009 DEEPAK KUMAR SAHU @ DEEPAK PRASAD & ORS Versus PREMLATA DEVI & ANR ----------- 2/ 18.05.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The issue raised by the present revision petition directly touches upon the pecuniary jurisdiction of the court as the petitioners pleaded that the court did not have the jurisdiction to try the suit on account of the value of the suit exceeding from the value fixed in law. It is contended that the petitioners presented the relevant records of the registry office in the form of letter indicating as to what is the fixed value of the suit property for taking into account so as to obtain a ruling from the court below on its jurisdiction or lack of jurisdiction but without considering that aspect of the matter or without holding an enquiry, the court below dismissed the suit. This Civil Revision petition is disposed of and the matter is remanded to the court below with a direction to hold an enquiry on the valuation of the suit property so as to decide as to whether it is under valued or over valued and decide as to whether the suit could be properly presented for its hearing before the court below. Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)