THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3172 of 2011 Date:14.02.2011 Between: N. Sivanna ..... Petitioner AND The Joint Collector, Anantapur and others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K. Maheswara Rao Counsel for Respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies The Court made the following: ORDER: The petitioner, whose fair price shop authorization was cancelled by respondent No.2, filed this writ petition aggrieved by the alleged inaction of respondent No.1 in disposing of the stay application filed in the appeal filed by the petitioner. After hearing Sri K.Maheswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies, I am of the opinion that the petitioner’s grievance can be redressed if respondent No.1 disposes of the appeal itself which is stated to be posted to 26.02.2011. Accordingly, respondent No.1 is directed to dispose of the petitioner’s appeal as expeditiously as possible and preferably on 26.02.2011 itself after hearing the petitioner. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.3932 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 14th February, 2011 GHN