PETITIONER$ “0 HIGH COURT QF $HHATTI$GARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0; 854 OF 2003 1. Shashi alias Jagdish, aged about 58 years, son of Hiradhar. Reshik Kumar, aged about 53 year5, Son of Hiradhar. Both resident of village Mohka, Basna, Tahsil Saraypali‘ District Raipur. 3 smt. Gadain Bai, aged about 55 years, Dlo Hiradhar, W/o Shri Ram, Rr'o Mudpar, Tahsil Saraypali, District Raipur. 4. smt, Surendri Bai, aged about 48 years, D/o Hiraram, WIO Manohar, R/o Chibarra. Tahsil Saraypali, District Raipur. 5. Dayaram, aim 0f Demru, aged about 50 years. 6i Smt. Rupayee, W/o Sakharam, aged about 63 years. 7. Mahendra Kumar, son of Sakharam, aged about 47 years. 8n Sanatan, son of Sakharam, aged about 36 years . 9. Chinya alias Purushottam, son of Sakharam, aged 35 years. Nos. 5 to 9 all residents of Mohka, Basna, Tahsil Saraypali, District Raipur. 10. Sankirtan‘ son of sakharam, aged about 39 years, Head Constabie, University Thana, Raipur. Niranjan, son of Sakharam, aged about 43 yeas. 12. Abhimanyu, son of Sakharam, aged about 28 years. Nos. 11 and 12 residents of village Mohka, Basna, Tahsil Saraypali, District Raipur. Asharam, son of Duryodhan, aged about 66 years, cultivator, resident of Mohka, Basna, Tahsil Saraypali, District Raipur. Jagdish, son of Duryodhan, aged about 51 years, teacher. Saraypali, District Rainur. Versus RESPONDENTS 97/ ’3 Haduram, mn af Duryadhan, aged about 48 years, Patwari, resident af Saraypaii, District Raipur. Smt‘ Chitre Bail Dfo Duryndhan, wife of Vasudeo, aged about 63 years, resident of Mohka. Basna, Tahsii Saraypaii, Di5trict Raipur. 3"1 $mtv Ayodhya Bai, Dfo Duryodhan, Wlo J Pavitro, Rio Kisdi, PD. Baioda, Tahsil ‘ Saraypali, District Raipur. (i Kishore Kumar Barikh, S/o Asjaram, aged about 50 years, R/o Saraypaii, District Raipur (Defendant No.1 2) 7V State of Madhya Prade$h, now Chhattisgarh, through the Coilecior, Raipur (Defendant No.1 1) (Writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K‘ Agnihotri, J. Present :-= Shri Vikas Shrivastava, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Sunii Otwari. counsel for the petitionere. Shri Shaehank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER ’ (Passed on this -.—-a,—--“-- 20 day of October, 2008) Learned counee! appearing for the petitioners, on inetructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw thie petition on the ground that the eame hae become infruotuous, to which learned counsel appearing for the state has no objeotion, 2) ln View of the foregoing, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3) Consequently, pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sdl- / /"VVVV l Gowri f \l Sau'sh K AgnmOm Judge /