IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 806 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Yashpal Singh Rawat S/o late Guman Singh Rawat, 2. Smt. Sureshi Rawat W/o Yashpal Singh Rawat, 3. Sri Sanjeev Rawat S/o Yashpal Singh Rawat, All R/o Village Ghandiyal P.O. Naithana, District Pauri Garhwal ......... Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary (Home Affairs), Dehradun 2. Senior Superintendent of Police, District Haridwar 3. Smt. Monika Rawat D/o Late Jag Mohan Singh Negi, R/o House, No. 123, RCQ Sector-5 A BHEL, P.S.Ranipur, District Hardwar ......... Respondents Sri Anuj Kumar Singh, Advocate on behalf of Sri Amish Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri M.A.Khan, Brief Holder on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. Sri Kamlesh Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of Sri Pankaj Miglani Advocate for respondent no. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Sri Anuj Kumar Singh, Advocate on behalf of Sri Amish Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri M.A.Khan, Brief Holder on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. Sri Kamlesh Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of Sri Pankaj Miglani Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Sri M.A.Khan, the learned counsel for the State submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners Yashpal Singh Rawat, Smt. Sureshi Rawat and Sanjeev Rawat seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them has now become infructuous as the Police after the completion of the investigation has filed charge-sheet against the petitioners before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 11.07.2006 stands vacated automatically. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 11.09.2006 11.09.2006 A