WP(C) 3169/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. D. Sur, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mrs. Phukan, l earned State counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 6. The petitioners by the present petition have raised 2(two) grievances, n amely, (i) alleged attempt made by the private respondents to dispossess them fr om the land, which according to the petitioners belongs to them being the ancest ral property and (ii) the non-registration of the FIR by the Palasbari P.S. (Mir za), lodged on 09.06.2011. The dispute as raised by the petitioners relating to the alleged attempt to dispossess them from the land by the private respondents is to be raised bef ore the appropriate Civil Court having jurisdiction over the matter by filing ap propriate suit and also praying for injunction. Relating to the grievance for no n-registration of the FIR, the petitioners are yet to approach the Superintenden t of Police intimating him about non-registration of the FIR. That being the position, the present petition is disposed of giving libe rty to approach the appropriate Civil Court having jurisdiction over the matter and also to approach the Superintendent of Police. The status quo as regards the possession of the land, however, shall be maintained for a period of 2(two) months from today i.e. up to 17.09.2011, so as to enable the petitioners to approach the appropriate Civil Court having jurisd iction over the matter. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.