IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.: 5339 of 2010. Decided on: 11.03.2011. _____________________________________________________ Kamlesh Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Gautam, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral).: The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that though he has worked for more than 12 years, his case has not been considered for regularization as per Annexure P-2, dated 18th June, 2007. The case of the petitioner has already been recommended by the Deputy Commissioner, Solan vide Annexure P-8, dated 4th February, 2009. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - terms of Annexure P-2, dated 18th June, 2007 read in conjunction with letter Annexure P-8, dated 4th February, 2009 towards regularization, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment, with all consequential benefits. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. March 11, 2011. (sck).