1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO. 16 OF 2009 (Mahadeo Buddha Gedam & Ors. vs. Govinda Sukruji Ramteke) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JANUARY 19, 2009. Heard Shri Thengre, learned counsel for the appellants – original defendants. The plaintiff's suit for injunction and for possession has been concurrently decreed. The facts show that initially 10 Acres and 42R land was given to the defendants by State Government but as some portion of it was not brought under cultivation, its allotment was cancelled and 2 Acres of such cancelled /withdrawn portion was then made over to present respondent/ plaintiff. The Courts have found that in spite of allotment in his favour, the defendants/ present appellants were trying to obstruct plaintiff's possession and ultimately dispossessed him. The Courts have also relied upon appeal filed by present appellants before the Government claiming back the land allotted to the plaintiff as a circumstance against the appellants. The consideration also shows that the incident in 2 which the dispossession has taken place has also been brought on record by the respondent. In the circumstance, no substantial question of law arises in this matter and hence the appeal is dismissed. JUDGE *GS.