IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT QF CHHATTESSARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) N0. 4(lfc /2011 PETTTEONER ^ ^ ^•!^...- /V~> .^''a'^-f'~ -J'/L.O.^-"' » "",.fcf^;"" ....-""1 'sy^<'\^ ^^' ?!e^A....-"""\ ^-' y^ RESPONbENTS Mohd. Rustam Khan, S/o Shri Hafizullah Khan, aged about 58 years, Headmaster, (Primary School) Korbi (Dhatura) Block Pali, Distt.-Korba (C.6.). VERSUS ; 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. -Raipur (C.6.) '2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Korba bistt.-Korba (C.6.) 3. Block Education Officer, Pali, Distt.-Korba (C.6.) WRIT PETETEON UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF THE f^ CONSTTTUTEON OF INDIA .f^s^ %,' 1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BII-ASPUR • u/»w>' • PBTITIONBR RESPONDENTS W.P.ISl.NO. 6116/2011 Mohd. Rustam KIiaa versus State ofC.G. & Others Shri Anil Singh Rajput, counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Yashwant SmghThakur, Dy.A.G, for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICa-E 226 OF THB CON8TITUTIOM ORDER (14.10.2011) Grievance of fh.e petitioner in thc present petition is that the petitioner was appointed as Assistaat Teacher on a fixed pay scale of Rs. 100-150 for a period of two years aad after completion of probation, he was granted regular pay scale ofRs. 169-300. Contention of the counsel fcr the petitioner is that he is entttled for regular pay scale wifh effect froia fhe date of iuitial appoiatment aud their case is squarely covered with number of decisions passed by fhis Court aud also the judgment rendered by the M.P. State Admmistrative Tribunal, Jabalpur m O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhufcant Ycwbi Ss 56 Others Vs. State ofBS.P. & Othcrs^where in it has been held ftiat smularly placed.teachers are entiUed for regular pay scale from the date oftheir initial appoiutDieat It is not disputed by both the parties fhat fhe inatter was taken up by the State to the Apex Court but the appcal was also dismissed by fhe Apex Court upholdiug fhe decision ofthe Tribunal to fhe effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled for regular pay scale fi-oin fhe date of tiieir iTiitial appointinent. In view of fhe above subniission m.ade by fhe coiUMel for fhe parties, fhe petition is disposed of in fhe same temis i.e. the petitioner is granted Uberty to make a representation, if so advised, in J35I8MIQ ja^apud -/PS "AB3I TRtA SaTOBpXOOOB tTt A^OlqS UOI^^Uasaida 3Tp. 3pI33p O^ Ai-I3C|T[ Vs aq ppioA paiuaouoo AtUoiRnB wy. pTte aseo aift jo S)u:3TO arp. uo uoiindo AIIB passajdxa i.oa SBq vm.oo srtp i.Btp jBsp apBm ST ^i •S^SB} aip.J0 ^ttRn-tos snp jage japio qqBipis ssed cq. ssi^uoiRnB 3}.B»S 3IR rooig patoadxa ST ^i •AigiiipLioooejaiis.i anres o^. pappua aq ABCTI j:3aoi»p.ad 3ip 'se'TO'GO PS4®P-ispio Aq E6/S689 "ON (ifAio) aottTtSd aABsq {Bioadg TII ^inoo suiajdng sq^ ^Cq panug^aoo ^usnbasqns pits (aidns) npfBA ^aKspiqpBjrtl ai leiinquj, 3ApBqsTOnapv sfs^S ap Aq p38SBd japiio jad se Saiiooj auies 3tp. uo sptre'j.e jsuortpad aq^ ji -aAT^oadsjad sii ui pi[B s^uaTo: tiAO s^i uo asBO Jtaip japisaoo o^ paioaiiip si ^uapuodsai pSTuaoaoo aip 'tuiq in pTte (t^/d s-mxaunv) 800S'ET "ZB pa^BP JBinojio atp ptre iiiaiiiSpnC piesaiojB 3tp.jo tq§iiatp