IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45876 of 2008 YOGENDRA CHAUDHARY @ LOHA CHAUDHARY … PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … OPP. PARTY ----------- 2. 27.11.2008 Heard Sri Awanish Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri D. Mehta, APP for the State. The case is under Section 414 of the IPC and under some Sections of the Arms Act. The possession of an arms as per the description in the seizure memo is the recovery from the petitioner. The arms was made in USA and was a prohibited arms as it was a pistol of 9 mm. Considering the recovery of a prohibited arms, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner in spite of the submission that a similarly situated accused Hari Nandan Yadav has been admitted to bail. I have perused the seizure memo in respect of arms recovered from Hari Nandan Yadav and those arms were not prohibited arms. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)