IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9284 of 2011 SHRI KRISHNA PRASAD …. Petitioner Versus SMT.JULY DEVI ….. Opp. Party ----------- 2. 21.06.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed against the order dated 21.12.2010 passed by the Sub Judge – 1, Patna in Title Suit No. 99 of 2010 whereby the learned court below has allowed the application under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 C.P.C. filed on behalf of the plaintiff. From perusal of the impugned order it appears that the learned court below found that the plaintiff has filed the suit for specific performance of agreement to sell dated 12.5.2009 and the defendant has already filed written statement in the said suit. The learned court below also found that the amendment sought for is formal in nature and the same will not change the nature, scope and cause of action for the suit. In such view of the matter, in my opinion the supervisory jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is uncalled for. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)