IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 230 of 2007 Between: Chava Krishna Murty S/o. Ch. Ramayyah R/o. 6-3-626/c3, Parameswara Apartments, Anandanagar, Hyderabad-500 004. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Superintending Engineer, R & B, Electricial Circle, 2 Executive Engineer (General) Mahaveer Marg. A.C. Gardens, Hyderabad (Prl. Employer) 3 Principal Secretary, R & B Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 4 Update services Pvt. Ltd., UDS House, 54A, Womens Co-operative Society,. Road No.2, .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate order, writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus by declaring that the impugned tender notification vide CTN 29/2005-06/1176/dt. 15-12-2005 published on 26-12-05 without specifying the estimated value of the work, without specifically mentioning the standard value of the tender which includes contribution of 13.6% of employers contribution towards EPF and 4.7% towards ESI when tghe employer side and 2% tax to be deducted at source etc,. in terms of rules laid down in G.O.Ms.No. No. 94, dt. 1-7-2003 and the action of the 1st Respondent by refusing to issue the tender schedule to the petitioner and wherein the tender was finalized and awarded in favour of the 4th Respondent as irreglar, void arbitrary, in violation of Art. 14, 15 (1), 298 and 299 of construction of India, and in violation of G O Ms No. 94 dt. 1-7-2003 and thus to cancel the impugned tender notice and which was award in favour of 4th Respondent in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO.230 OF 2007 ORAL ORDER There being no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 02.06.2009, the matter is directed to be listed today for dismissal. When the matter is called today there is no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for default. No order as to costs. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 4th JUNE 2009 *TSNR