IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29344 of 2010 SUSHMITA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. 12. 08. 2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being lady is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the petitioner got appointment on the post of Aanganwari Sevika on the basis of forged certificate. It is submitted that document was not forged only there was dispute with regard to wrong mentioning of father's name of the petitioner in the alleged certificate. The impugned order reflects that considering the fact, learned Sessions Judge recorded that since the petitioner has no apprehension of arrest hence this anticipatory bail application is rejected as non-maintainable. Considering the fact that petitioner has been named in the F.I.R.hence it can not be said that there is no apprehension to the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Town (Nawada) P.S. Case No. 192/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. m.p. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)