1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR L.P.A. No. 39 of 2011. In Writ Petition No. 2970 of 2010 (D). Sau. Gitanjali Arvind Jaiswal ...VERSUS.. Executive Engineer Admn/Nodal Officer, Internal Grievance Redressal Section, M.S.E.D.C.L., Gadchiroli & others ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr. Shantanu Khedkar, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. A.D. Mohagaonkar, Advocate for the Respondents. C ORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK; AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : 11th July, 2011. Heard. We see nothing wrong with the order passed by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Nagpur on 31.08.2009 and confirmed by the Hon’ble Electricity Ombudsman on 18.12.2009 directing the respondent to shift 11 K.V. over head line at the expenditure of the appellant as the appellant had given an undertaking in that regard before the Grievance Cell and had also undertaken to pay the cost towards the shifting 11 K.V. over head line 2 while applying for shifting. In view of the undertaking given by the appellant to bear the costs for shifting of the 11 K.V. over head line, the Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE NSN