HIGH COURT OF CHHATT8SGARH AT BiLASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J Misc. Appeal (0 No. 335 of 2011 Appeilants Clajmants •^ \ 1. Smt. Kajal Bai Tandan wlfe of late Ram Prasad Tandan, aged about 40 years. 2. Ashok Kumar son of late Ram Prasad Tandan, aged about 23 years. 3. Ku. Nanki d/o. late Ram Prasad Tandah, aged about 21 years. 4. Dudhe Ram son of late Ram Prasad Tandan, aged about 19 years. 5. Ku. Bhun^hwari d/o. late ram Prasad Tandaori,:%ged about 17 years. 6. Ku. Budhkunwar, d/o.late Ram Prasad Tandan, aged about 15 years. 7. Chaln Das son of late Ram Prasad Tandaon, aged about 13 years. 8. Bise son oflate Ram Prasad Tandaon, aged about 60 years. 9. Smt. Bita! Bai wife of Bise Tandaon, aged about 55 years. Respondents No. 5 to 7 are minors through their natural mother Smt. Kejai Bai, wife of late Ram Prasad Tandan. All are r/o. vliiage Khalri (Machanpar), Tahsii Dongergaon, District Rajnandgaon (CG). VERSUS Respondents (Non-appJicants) 1. Arun Kumar Yadav, son of Shyamrath Yadav, aged about 24 years, Driver, s/0. Station para, Ward No.11, Near ; Durga Temple, Rajnandgaon, District / Rajnandgaon (CG) through T/A, Gurunanak Transport, G.E. Road, Rajnandgaon (CG). 2. Karanjit Singh son of Dilbag Singh (Vehicie Owner), r/o. B/A Kailash Nagar, Rajnandgaon (CG) through: T/A, Gurunanak Transport, G.E. Road, Rajnandgaon (CG). 3 The National Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office, Kamthee Line, Rajnandgaon, Tahsil and District Rajnandgaon(CG). Mlsceilaneous AppeaS under Section 173 of } Motor Vehicles Act Present : Shri VK Sharma, counsei for the appellants. 1.-^ ORDJER (17th March, 2011) The fotlowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri VK Sharma, learned counsei for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the appeai'filed by the appellants / claimants for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Additidnai Mofor Acckient Claims Tribunal, Rajnandgaon, vide award dated 27.10.2010, passed inclaim case No.64/2009 with the iiberty of filing 'cross-objectons for enhancement of the compensation in the appeai of the insurer/ owner/ driver of the offending vehicle. 2) Permission granted. 3) . With the aboveiiberty, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4) Certified copy as per rujes. 1 Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge o^<V^~