CRM NO. M-34924 OF 2010(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM NO. M-34924 OF 2010(O&M) DECIDED ON : 04.01.2011 Gurpreet Singh and another ...Petitioners versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. Rajiv Vij, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Amandeep Singh Rai, AAG, Punjab. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) As per allegations of the prosecution, Darshan Singh s/o Surjan Singh was armed with Kirpan and he gave injury on the head of Thana Singh which was declared dangerous to life. The injury attributed to Gursewak Singh was also stated to be on the head of Thana Singh. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that Gursewak Singh has been allowed concession of bail. So, the petitioner Darshan Singh is also entitled to concession of bail. So far as Darshan Singh is concerned, he has been attributed injury which was dangerous to life. So, he is not entitled to bail. CRM NO. M-34924 OF 2010(O&M) -2- The bail petition qua petitioner Darshan Singh stands dismissed. So far as petitioner Gurpreet Singh s/o Naib Singh is concerned, he gave daang blow to Gurjant Singh. No specific injury has been attributed to him. Out of 29 accused, 15 have been declared innocent and others are on bail except the petitioners. So, in these circumstances, I am of the view that Gurpreet Singh is entitled to concession of bail. Consequently, the bail petition qua Gurpreet Singh stands allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of trial Court. Disposed of. JANUARY 04, 2011 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE