IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No. 11580 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : SEPTEMBER 2, 2009 KULWANT SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. YK Sharma, DAG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) For the reasons recorded in CWP 11612 of 2009 (Smt.Narinder Kaur v. State of Punjab and others), the petition is allowed to the limited extent that the respondents would have no right to effect recovery from the petitioner on account of erroneous fixation of pay. Consequently, it is further held that any amount recovered in the interregnum period from the retiral benefits of the petitioner, shall be refunded to the petitioner within 4 months of receipt of certified copy of this order. September 2, 2009 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?