FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5312 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders. 1 Mr.D.R. Irale Patil, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K.G. Patil, AGP for the respondent NO.1 Mr. S.T. Shelke, Standing Counsel for the State Election Commission. --- CORAM :- R.S. MOHITE & SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, JJ. DATE :- 31st AUGUST, 2010. --- 1] The petition is filed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 26/5/2010 alongwith Schedule B, which is accompanied thereto, passed by the Collector Jalna for the purpose of making ward wise reservations for the elections to the Gram Panchayat, Tembhurni, Taluka Jafrabad, District Jalna. 2] It is the contention of the petitioner that ward-wise reservation had been fixed on 3/5/2010 in the meeting held by the Tahsildar. It is the contention of the petitioner that in the said meeting, in the presence of the villagers lots were drawn and reservation was fixed. It is further the contention of the petitioner that, however, the Tahsildar behind the back of the villagers changed the reservation as fixed on 3/5/2010, prepared fabricated proceedings indicating different reservation. The FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5312 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders. 2 petitioner made a complaint before the Collector, who, after perusing the record passed the impugned order dismissing the objection raised by the present petitioner. 3] From the aforesaid facts, it is clear that the petition involves disputed questions of fact as allegations pertain to tampering of the record as it stands. The allegations made in the petition are denied by the respondent No.3 by filing an affidavit. Our attention was drawn to the objections taken by some other villagers. On perusal of those objections , we find that there is no allegation of fraud or fabricating the record. The petition involves disputed questions of fact which cannot be gone into in exercise of writ jurisdiction. The same is, therefore, summarily rejected. [SHRIHARI P. DAVARE,J.] [R.S. MOHITE, J.] grt/-