IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1009 of 2010 MD. AJIMUDDIN Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 27.9.2010. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner claims to be the husband of one Gosia Praveen, who is respondent no.2. The prayer in this writ application is for a direction to respondent State to ensure that respondent no.2 is freed from the custody of his father, as she is major and legally wedded wife of the petitioner. Considering the fact of the case, we do not find that the present application for issuance of writ of Habeas Corpus is maintainable. If the respondent no.2 is legally wedded wife of the petitioner and she is not being allowed to come and to live with the petitioner, then in that case the remedy lies before some other forum. The petitioner has an option to file his case for restitution of conjugal rights. This is not a case which can be considered as the case of illegal confinement. This application is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Mridula Mishra,J. ) ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)