IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.Nos.2609, 2612, 2687 and 21218 of 2000 WRIT PETITION No. 2609 of 2000 Between: 1 B.Venkata Naga Sai Kumar, S/o.Dr.B.V.Ramanaiah, Tripurantakam (Mandal), Praksham District. 2 M.Venkate Reddy S/o.M.Venkatarami Reddy R/o.Pullala Cheruvu Praksham District. 3 T.Hanumantha Rao S/o.T.Krishnamurthy Dornala, Praksham District. 4 M.Sampath Kumar S/o.M.Madha Rao Venkatapur, Warangal District. 5 B.Raghvendar Rao S/o.B.Tirumala Rao Kodhada, Nalgonda District. 6 G.Mohan Rao S/o.G.Narasimha Rao Gurrampadu Mandal, Warangal District. 7 V.Raja Trivikram S/o.Jagannadham Ghanapur, Warangal District. 8 G.V.Suryanarayana S/o.G.Simhachalam Machilipatnam, Krishna district. 9 A.N.V.Nanchara Rao, S/o.A.Neelakantam, Chinnaganjam, Praksam District. 10 N.Muralidhar S/o.Subbaratnam Seethanagaram, East Godavari District. 11 Y.Lakshmayya Babu S/o.Y.Raju Gokavaram, East Godavari District. 12 Y.Umamaheswar Rao S/o.Y.Kondal Rao Korukonda, East Godavari District. 13 G.V.K.Mallikarjun Rao S/o.Bachu Kotaiah Unguturu West Godavari District. 14 G.Ramana S/o.Seetharamaiah Achanta, West Godavari District. 15 R.C.Anand Kumar, S/o.Janardhan Rao, Eluru, West Godavari District. 16 M.Raju S/o.Raju.M Jangareddygudem, West Godavari District. 17 B.S.S.V.Sumamalini W/o.M.Ramesh Babu Ganapavaram, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 C.Obulamma, Rapathadu Mandal, Anantapur District. 2 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Prinicpal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development & Relief (Estt.VII) Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3 Commissioner of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 4 A.P.Administrative Tribunal, Rep. by its Registrar, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the 4th Respondent in O.A.No.6588/99 and quash the order dated 24-1-2000 and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.V.MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent : MR.J.R.MANOHAR RAO FOR R The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.Nos.2609, 2612, 2687 and 21218 of 2000 COMMON ORDER: (per HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU) In this batch of Writ Petitions, common question of law and fact arises for consideration; therefore, they are being disposed of by a common Order. It appears that the O.As were filed when the respective petitioners were sought to be reverted by the Proceedings dated 25-10- 1999 of the Commissioner of Panchayat Raj and Rural Employment, Hyderabad, which was issued as a consequence of a clarificatory Memo issued by the Government dated 12-10-1999. The Tribunal declared that the clarificatory Memo dated 12-10-1999 was invalid and consequently allowed the O.As. Aggrieved by the same, those who were not parties to the above O.As. filed these Writ Petitions by obtaining leave. Now it is brought to the notice of this Court that that as soon as the clarificatory memo issued on 12-10-1999 was set aside by the Tribunal, Government took a decision to withdraw the same and issued orders on 23-10-2000 to that effect. In view of the same, nothing survives for further adjudication in these Writ Petitions and they are liable to be dismissed as having become infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _______________________ (Ghulam Mohammed,J) 24th July, 2008 _____________ (C.V.Ramulu,J) prk