IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3939 OF 1994 Kamgar Sabha, Thane ..... ......... Petitioner V/s Entremonde Polyecoaters Ltd. & Ors..... ......... Respondents. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Office Notes, Office ) Court's or Judge's Orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances ) Court's orders or directions and ) Registrar's orders. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Adv. for the petitioner absent. Mr.P.K.Rele, Sr. Adv. With Rajesh Rele with Mr.V.N.Tayade, Adv. For respondents. CORAM: A.P. DESHPANDE, J. 4.4.2007 PC: Counsel for the petitioner is absent. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the present petition has become infructuous on account of occurrence of subsequent events, such as cancellation of recognition of Union and respondent entering into settlement with other 1 union. Perusal of the impugned interlocutory order reveals that an application under Exh. U-2 was rejected by the Industrial Court by impugned order dated 17.8.1994 and aggrieved thereby this writ petition was filed. Though Rule was issued in the writ petition no interim relief was granted. In view of the fact that the impugned order is interlocutory order passed way back in the year 1994 there is no merit in the writ petition., For the reasons stated herein above writ petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. 4.4.07. 2