HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25925 of 2010 Date: 24th November 2010 Between : Bungapatta Prabhakar. …….Petitioner And The Station House Officer, Mothkur Police Station & others. ….Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25925 of 2010 ORDER : In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks directions by way of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondent No.1 in interfering with the constructions undertaken by him in the land belonging to him in Block No.1 of Mothkur village and Mandal of Nalgonda District, as illegal and arbitrary. It is the case of the petitioner that he is the absolute owner and possessor of open land admeasuring 1210 sq. yards, situated in Block No.1 of Mothkur village and Mandal of Nalgonda District. It is his case that when he was undertaking constructions in the aforesaid land and although such constructions are in accordance with the approved plan, there is interference by the 1st respondent- Station House Officer, at the instance of the 3rd respondent. Counter affidavit is filed by the 1st respondent- Station House Officer. In the counter affidavit, while denying the various allegations made by the petitioner, it is stated that on 07.10.2010 and 08.10.2010, one Smt. D.Vijaya, Chairman of ‘Neeti Viniyogadarula Sangham’ of Pedda Cheruvu and others have filed two complaints against the petitioner, stating that he is undertaking constructions contrary to the orders of this Court and the same will result in blocking of sluices of Peddacheruvu of Mothkur village and Mandal. It is stated that on such complaints, entries were made in the General Diary and inquiries were made. However, in the counter, it is stated that except receipt of two complaints by the Station House Officer, Police have not called the petitioner to the Police Station on 08.10.2010 or on any other date, nor they interfered with the construction work being undertaken by the petitioner in his land. Though there is an allegation of interference by the Police, except the affidavit of the petitioner, there is no other material to show the same. In any event, in the counter affidavit filed by the 1st respondent-Station House Officer, it is specifically stated that there is no interference by the Police either with the life and liberty of the petitioner or with the construction works undertaken by him. In that view of the matter, recording the aforesaid statement made by the 1st respondent-Station House Officer, this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. __________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 24th November 2010 ajr