IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2185 OF 2003 Daud Hussain Gaibi & Ors. .. Applicants Vs. Julekha Daud Shekasan & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. M.H. Solkar for the Applicants. Mr. U. V. Nikam, APP for Respondents. CORAM: S.K. SHAH, J. DATE : 18th April, 2006. P.C. Heard Learned Counsel for the Applicants. The grievance of the Applicants is about the order passed by the Revisional Court dismissing the Revision Application. The grievance is that the Applicant was not heard as the Applicant and his advocate was not present. However the perusal of the order passed in revision discloses that the revision court has taken into consideration the merits of the case i.e., the allegations disclosed in the complaint. What was challenged in the revision was about the issue of the process. However the allegations made in the complaint discloses the offence for which the process was issued. It cannot be said that the order is illegal or erroneous. Hence I do not find any merit in the application. Application is disposed of. ------- (S. K. SHAH, J)