(^ Cf! BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITION (0 N0. / 2011 PETITIONER ^)^^ ^'^^ffl •^y:^'' Santosh Mittal, S/o. Shri Kishan Mittal, Aged about 45 years, R/o. Patthalgoan,'w" Lailunga, District, Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS '1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K:S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) 3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER RESPONDENTS HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (0 N0. 71 90 OF2011 Santosh Mittal Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others 5CR (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Saurabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Dy. Advocate General for the State with Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State. Shri C.P. Shrivastava, ChiefMunicipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District Raigarh, is also present. ORDER (Passed on this 01st day of December, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. At the very outset Shri Murthy, leaffled Dy. Advocate General appearing with Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate, on instructions by the Chigf Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, who is present in the Court, submits that the impugned notice of demolition dated 25.11.2011, which without affording an opportunity of hearing, was issued for demolition of the alleged unauthorized construction, has been wifhdrawn by subsequent totice dated 26.11.2011 . A copy of the said notise is taken on record. 3. In view of the above, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. However, the Nagar Panchayat will not take any action without affording proper opportunity of hearing to the person concerned. The Nagar Panchayat may also decide the question of authorized or unauthorized structure, as the same is in dispute, before passing the order, after considering the Gases of the persons concerned. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ..-^ ashok