WPMS No. 622 of 2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Arvind Vashistha, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for the State. Against the notice dated 18th March, 2011 by the letters 583 and 529 certain demands towards the entertainment tax has been raised alongwith a direction to file the application for renewal of the licence in the prescribed format. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the demand, has filed the writ petition contending that the demand for entertainment tax can not be clubbed with the application of the petitioner for renewal of its licence. In my opinion, the petitioner should file its appropriate objection before the authority concerned who will decide the matter accordingly as per the provisions of the U.P. Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979. The writ petition is dismissed at this stage. It is made clear that if objection is filed, the authority concerned will decide the matter by a reasoned and speaking order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 08.04.2011 Shiv