1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR JUDGMENT LALA VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. SB Criminal Revision Pet. No. 158 OF 2000 under Section 397 read with section 401 Cr.P.C. against the order dated April 7, 2000 of Special Judge (Communal Riots) Tonk in Criminal Appeal No. 30 of 1998 whereby appeal filed by the accused petitioner was rejected and the order dated April 29, 1997 of Judicial Magistrate Uniara in Criminal Case No. 273 of 1992 whereby the petitioner was convicted and sentenced under section 304 A IPC and sentenced to one year simple imprisonment fine of Rs. 500 and in default fifteen days simple imprisonment and under section 181 of the Motor Vehicle Act imposed fine of Rs. 300 in default 10 days simple imprisonment and under sections 5/181 of Motor Vehicles Act imposed fine of Rs. 500 in default 15 days simple imprisonment. Date of Order : April 9, 2009 PRESENT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA Mr. S.K. Jain, for the petitioner. Mr. Peeyush Kumar, Public Prosecutor. BY THE COURT : This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner Lala against the order dated April 7, 2000 of Special Judge (Communal Riots) Tonk in Criminal Appeal No. 30 of 1998 whereby appeal filed by the accused 2 petitioner was rejected and the order dated April 29, 1997 of Judicial Magistrate Uniara in Criminal Case No. 273 of 1992 whereby the petitioner was convicted and sentenced under section 304 A IPC and sentenced to one year simple imprisonment fine of Rs. 500 and in default fifteen days simple imprisonment and under section 3/181 of the Motor Vehicle Act imposed fine of Rs. 300 in default 10 days simple imprisonment and under sections 5/181 of Motor Vehicles Act imposed fine of Rs. 500 in default 15 days simple imprisonment. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has not challenged the conviction part of the judgment of the Special Judger (Communal Riots) Tonk whereby the conviction of the petitioner under sections 304A IPC and section 3/181 and 5/181 of the Motor Vehicles Act was maintained and he was sentenced to suffer one year Simple Imprisonment with fine of Rs. 500 in default 15 days SI and fine of Rs.300/- and fine of Rs. 500/- in default 10 days and 15 days simple 3 imprisonment. The learned counsel for the petitioner made simple request to this court for reducing the period of sentence to the period already undergone by the petitioner in confinement, which is 49 days in the instant matter. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed this submission. The incident in the instant matter took place on July 19, 1992, which is 17 years ago. In these circumstances while maintaining the conviction of the petitioner under sections 304 A IPC, and sections 3/181 and 5/181 of the Motor Vehicles Act, his sentence is reduced to the period already under gone by him. The petitioner is on bail, his bail bonds stands canceled and he need not surrender. 3. For these reasons, the conviction of the petitioner under sections 304 A IPC and Sections 3/181 and 5/181 of the Motor Vehicles Act is maintained but his sentence is reduced to the period already under gone by him. Since the 4 petitioner is on bail he need not to surrender and his bail bonds stands discharged. As the main petition has been disposed the stay application also stands disposed. (Mahesh Chandra Sharma) J. OPPareek/