-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.9334 OF 2004 NO.9334 OF 2004 NO.9334 OF 2004 Dr Hindurao N. Pawar ... Petitioner v/s Sou Ambubai C. Kutnashalli and others ... Respondents Mr Anilkumar Patil for Petitioner. Mr Limaye i/b Mr A.A. Garge for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 20TH JULY 2005. -2- P.C. :- 1. As per the consent terms, the question whether the plot was divisible or not was to be decided by the Co-operative Society. An appointment of Commissioner for that purpose is not provided by the consent terms and therefore, the Executing Court has rightly rejected the application. I do not see any substance in the petition. Petition is rejected. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Personal Secretary of this Court as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. --------------------