IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 4TH APRIL 2011 / 14TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 10146 of 2011(P) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- K.G.RADHAKRISHNAN,S/O.GOPALAKRISHNAN, KALLIVALAPPIL VEEDU, KALLEPADAM POST, PAZHAYANNUR, TRISSUR-680 587. BY ADV. SRI.H.BADRUDDIN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. K.E.EAPEN JOHN, PRINCIPAL, COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, I T C, KALLEPADAM, PAZHAYANNUR, TRISSUR-680 587. 2. THE TRAINING DIRECTOR, EMPLOYMENT TRAINING AND INDUSTRIAL TRANING DEPARTMENT, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-14. 3. THE MANAGER, COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, I T C, KALLEPADAM POST, PAZHAYANNUR, THRISSUR-680 587. R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. T.K.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.10146/2011 P APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.H.2/7446/11 DTD. 17/03/2011 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR, INDUSTRIAL TRAINING DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA. P2: COPY OF TRANSFER CERTIFICATE NO.001768 FOR ADMISSION NO.2433 FOR DRAUGHTSMAN (CIVIL) COURSE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P3: COPYOF THE PROVISIONAL NTC CERTIFICATE. P4: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF TECHNOLOGY FOR THE DRAUGHTSMAN (CIVIL) COURSE AND PASSED THE PRESCRIBED TEST HELD IN THE MONTH OF JULY 2008. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ........................................... W.P(C).NO.10146 OF 2011 ............................................. Dated this the 4th day of April, 2011. JUDGMENT The first prayer in the writ petition reads as follows: “a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 1st respondent to issue the original of Ext.P3 NTC of Renjith K.R. to the petitioner on production of a power of attorney issued by his son K.R. Renjith duly attested by the Indian Consulate of Sultanate of Oman, in a time frame manner as expeditiously as possible”. 2. Counsel for respondents 1 and 3 submits that on the petitioner producing power of attorney of the student, his son, certificate will be given to the petitioner. Therefore recording the submission as above, this writ petition is disposed of directing that if the petitioner produces power of attorney of his son, certificate will be issued by respondents 1 and 3. Sd/= ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. /true copy/ cl P.A. to Judge.