1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1739/2009 (Rahul s/o Jagannath Tandala & Anr. Vs. The State of Mah.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.VR Dhorde, Adv. h/for Mr. NK Choudhari, Adv. for applicant; Mr.SG Nandedkar, APP for State. ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 10 th September,2009. 1. Heard learned Counsel and learned APP. 2. In an offence, vide Crime No.154/2008, registered at Shivaji Nagar Police Station, Beed, for an offence punishable under Sections 307. 143, 147, 148, 427, 149 of Indian Penal Code and under section 4 and 25 of the Arms Act and under Section 3(1)(x) of Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, the accused in custody from 25th August, 2008, sought bail vide Criminal Application No.3675/2008. 3. By order dated 28th November, 2008, having regard to the nature of the accusations and the statement made by the accused, and since there was a gun- shot incident, there was attack by the mob on the vehicles standing at the spot 2 wherein the present applicant/accused were allegedly vandalizing the goods and damaged the windshield of the cars. This Court, while directing the release of the applicants/accused, restrained their movements for the abode and were directed to furnish their changed address to the concerned Police. 4. There is a grievance from the Investigator that no such changed address is provided, though it was so directed. 5. The Investigator has attributed several aspects as to the role of the applicant/accused in the matter and in the vicinity and apprehension, as indicated, if the condition is relaxed, the accused may create atmosphere of terrorism in the area. 6. Taking these aspects into consideration, the relaxation as sought cannot be entertain. Application rejected. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/cran1739.090