IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12958 of 2004 MEENA KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 6.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is apparent from perusal of annexue-1 that the appointment which the petitioner is challenging has been made on the basis of the judicial order passed by a Bench of this Court. In that background even if the contention of the petitioner is accepted to be correct that she was not made a party or heard before such order came to be passed by the High Court, the remedy may not be by way of filing a fresh writ application challenging the appointment which has came to be made on the order of the High Court in yet another matter. The petitioner could have sought a review of that order or filed an appeal. This writ application is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)