IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23019 of 2011 Tipka Singh @ Bibhishan Kumar Singh, Son of Chhatish Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 28.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 3 R.P. (U.P.) Act, Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner is in custody since 30.3.2011 on the basis of his confessional statement and the petitioner’s wife is ready to stand surety for him, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with three sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Judicial Railway Magisgrate, Khagaria, in connection with Thana Bihpur RPF P.S. Case No. 01 of 2011 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, the second bailor shall be the wife of the petitioner and the 3rd bailor must be local since the petitioner belongs to Bhagalpur. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the 2 police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)