gyMTgE Him; cwmr OF JtyggfgmEmgr BILAEWR (043w; mam %@M1.€.0...1 6 6. 1... we; ‘gP .I .22) 1) Manohar Jethani, ageéi about' 35 yek‘ms, éon of Late Dr. V arizilcEas Jethani ‘Neéir, ‘Kohinoor Hotel. Amardeep Talkées Road, Ganesh Ram Nagar Réaipw <C.’.G.) @wmv‘“ ~ Kes‘naxmal fkgrzzwal, aged about 65 yearS, :‘k/o éhri Kashmirilal Agreawal, R/O. KhuwsipEr. 3hilai Dislat, nurg (C.G.) taushii man: 3on1, Aged about 54 yeéErs, b‘an of Emri Faggulal \i :ioni.‘ R/O Kmhari, Digst‘t. Durg (CGF‘Q Raje$ra Dubey. aged 8b0ut"3‘8 years, Son oi Chanfirika Prasad Dubey R/G Bemetexa, Diatt. Dur (C§'xhat‘c immrh} §axrnin&th. ageai about 6O years, _5/0 $hri Manglu $a0 Tamakzi’r, R/G. burg Digt‘c. Durg (C.G.) Ratan Lal Agrawal, gge§ abaut 4o years, Eon o:E $hri Grargilal Agrawal 0/0. Goyal Meaical $tore$ New Rhurgsipar, Bhilai Diwiz ; Burg ( Chhattié3g&rh )4. ..nub2 (T “ g ) £atate m? Chhattisgwh Through g éecretary Department of health anc’l family welfare Mantralazya, 33.K.$". Bhawan R aipu'r: R2} / Dr. K.L. Gopawar.’ Regietrer .cum-.Secretary, Regi5ra‘tj.0n Tribune}. Noorani Chowk, Raja Taléb, Fire-t: Floor AywVe&ic Ho spite}. Commune. , Reipur (C .G .) / ' Chhawisgarh Bte‘ce Pharmacy Cwuncil Thraugh : Registrar Necrani Chowk, Rejatalab, 3km £10012. Ayumredic Hoszrtital » Compounc‘z, Raipur (chhattiey h) REamqvgggss mm; Pmmxcm UNDER Aguixcms 226/227 OF Tgg CON$TITIEION~QF mDEA. XI—HC-ZZ 2-1-2004 Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Sh p€titionefs. . Lalchandani, Advocates for the Shri Gautam Bhaduri, respondent No. 1. Shri Prashant Mishra, fOI Shri S. Adiraju, on be Additional Contral Govt. $tan No‘4. Heard. By this writ petition u Constitution of lndia, the peti the respondents in not hold‘ registered pharmacists and certiflcates. It is pointed out by appearing for respondent Nos dated 1 1.09.2003 first register the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (her short) has been prepared. thereafter by a notification d Council has been constituted the Registrar has been duly a ri Y.C. Sharma and Shri Vinod Dy. Advocate General for respondent N0s.2 and 3. half of Shri V.V.S. Murthy, ding Counsel, for respondent gnder Article 226/227 of the 1ers challenge the inaction of 1g the elections amongst the not issuing the renewal ri Mishra, learned counsel and 3, thatE‘by a notification required under Section 30 of fter referred to as the Act in is further submitted that ed 09.10.2003 the Pharmacy der Section 19 of the Act and pointed. It is also submitted [doW : e t' 1 h s a t XI—HC‘22 Mm. mm that Ex—Of‘ficin Members 0f other departments have heen notified. It is submitted thatiullder the provisione of the Act six registered pharmacists are to be inducted into the Council after election amongst the registered pharmacists in accordance with part(a) of Sec ion 19 of the Act. Having considered the “acts and circumstances of the the fact that since the first register has been prepared case and material on record now there will be no difficulty in issuing renewal certificates o the pharmacists, it is directed that the aforesaid requireme ts be done in accordance With law as early as possible pref rably on or before 30.04.2004. All the parties including the S te to cooperate. With the aforesaid ob ervations this petition stands disposed of. Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge Certified copy as per rul s. d