IN THE HIGH COURTOF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 15568 of 2003 Date of decision: 22.12.2008 Mahender and another. Petitioners. vs. Bimla and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.S.KHEHAR. HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR. --- Present: Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate, for petitioner Mahender. Mr.S.S.Siwach, Advocate, for petitioner Pappu Mr.Jitender Nara, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr.Surinder K.Bishnoi, DAG,Haryana, for respondent Nos. 4 and 5. -- J.S.KHEHAR,J. (Oral) Respondent No.1 Bimla Devi filed an application under section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation)Act, 1961, seeking the ejectment of the petitioners herein, on account of the unauthorised occupation of khasra no.196 in village Islamgarh, Tehsil Jhajjar, District Rohtak. The petitioners were ordered to be evicted from the land in question, on account of the acceptance of the prayer made by Bimla Devi (respondent No.1). The orders passed by the Revenue Authorities eventually culminated in the passing of an order dated 22.5.2003 (Annexure P7) by the Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak. Before this Court, the solitary contention at the hands of the learned counsel for the petitioners is, that they were not in unauthorised occupation of any part of khasra No.196. It is, therefore, that this Court by its order dated 5.2.2008, directed the demarcation of the land in question, so as to determine whether or not the petitioners are in unauthorised CWP No.15568 of 2003 (2) occupation of khasra No.196. The demarcation report, in compliance with the directions issued by this Court, has been placed on the record of this case as Annexure A-1. A perusal of Annexure A-1 reveals, that neither of the petitioners are in unauthorised occupation of khasra No.196. In view of the factual position, noticed hereinabove, we are of the view that the impugned orders are inconsequential, as the petitioners are not in unauthorised occupation of khasra No.196. It would be pertinent to mention, that while defending the claim of respondent No.1, learned counsel for respondent No.1 invited our attention to the findings recorded in the demarcation report Annexure A-1 in respect of the petitioner Mahender, wherein, it has been found out that the petitioners are in unauthorised possession of khasra No.343. In our considered view, the claim raised by respondent No.1 Bimla Devi against the petitioners was only in respect of khasra No.196. The finding recorded in the demarcation report Annexure A-1 to the effect that the petitioners were in unauthorised occupation of some other khasra numbers, has nothing to do with the impugned orders. For the reasons recorded hereinabove, we are satisfied that no order is called for in the present case, specially in the background of the fact that the petitioners have not been found in unauthorised possession of the land in question. Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. ( J.S.Khehar) Judge (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge December 22, 2008 rk