IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13620 of 2011 Upendra Yadav, S/O Gedhari Yadav, R/O Vill.-Ramka, P.S.- Ariyari, Distt.-Sheikhpura. . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Distt. Sheikhpura. 3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Sub-Division-Sheikhpura, Distt.- Sheikhpura. 4. The Block Development Officer Block-Ariyari, Distt.-Sheikhpura. 5. The Panchayat Secretary, Ramka, P.S.-Sheikhpura, Distt. Sheikhpura. 6. The Mukhiya, Ramka, P.S.-Sheikhpura, Distt. Sheikhpura. . . . . . . Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2/ 30.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is a P.D.S. dealer within Ariyari Block in the district of Sheikhpura. The petitioner was allotted rice under SGRY Scheme between 2002-2006. The petitioner disputes the quantity of rice allotted to him. He submits that after distribution of rice against issuance of permits only 6.49 quintals of rice remained with him. The issue involved which is to be determined by the authority concerned. For the present, I direct that the petitioner would deposit 40% of the value of 6.49 quintals of rice at the rate of Rs.10/- per kg. or the rice in its present form within five weeks from today. On deposit of such amount or quantity of rice, no coercive action would be taken against the petitioner. Nothing in this order should be construed that this Court has come to a conclusion that the rice that remained undistributed would be only 6.49 quintals. It is for the respondents to decide the same. The petitioner would file a representation before the authority 2 concerned within five weeks from today, who would dispose of the same within 10 weeks thereafter. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)