IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 12TH JULY 2010 / 21ST ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 21459 of 2010(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.THARANATH, SECRETARY, PAIVALIKE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, P.O.PAIVALIKE, KASARGOD DISTRICT-671348. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS (DEVELOPMENT) DIRECTORATE OF PANCHAYATS THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE PRESIDENT, PAIVALIKE GRAMA PANCHAYAT, P.O.PAIVALI KE, KASARGOD DISTRICT-671348 MR.ARAVIND KUMAR BABU, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.21459 of 2010 (F) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 12th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner was the Secretary of Paivalike Grama Panchayat. By Ext.P1 order dated 28/02/2008 he was placed under suspension. It is seen from Ext.P13 communication dated 08/04/2010 issued by the 1st respondent, that the Suspension Review Committee in its meeting held on 08/03/2010 reviewed the suspension of the petitioner and recommended reinstatement in a non-sensitive post. According to the petitioner, despite Ext.P13, he has not been reinstated so far. Therefore, he has filed Ext.P14 request to the 1st respondent and there has not been any response so far. Therefore, this writ petition has been filed. 2. If as a matter of fact, Ext.P13 has not been implemented and Ext.P13 is still in force, the 2nd respondent is bound to implement the said order and pass orders posting the petitioner. 3. Having regard to his grievance that Ext.P13 has not been implemented so far, this writ petition is disposed of directing that WP(C) No.21459/2010 -2- on the production of a copy of this judgment, the 2nd respondent shall consider Ext.P13 and if Ext.P13 is still in force, necessary orders in implementation thereof will be passed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of its receipt. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg