IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 26TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 7TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 5743 of 2009(K) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- MOHANAN NAIR, ARUN BHAVAN, MURIYANKARA, PARASSALA VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. MR.T.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARASSALA POLICE STATION, PARASSALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARASSALA POLICE STATION, PARASSALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. SHEEJA, SIVAPATHMAM, KAITHAKUZHY, EZHACHIRA, EDAKKODE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 5. VINU, MELEVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, METHUKUMMAL, SURYAKODE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 6. SHAJI, SIVAPATHMAM, KAITHAKUZHY, EZHACHIRA, EDAKKODE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 7. SURESH, ROADARIKATHU VEEDU, KAITHAKUZHY, EZHACHIRA, EDAKKODE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 8. VINOD, ULOOR NIVAS, KARALI, PARASSALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. WP(C).No. 5743 of 2009(K) 9. SANU, VADALIKKUTTAM, MURIYANKARA, PARASSALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.BNJAMIN PAUL FOR R1 TO R3 ADV. MR.M.SREEKUMAR FOR R7 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 5743 of 2009(K) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE ORDER, DATED 31/07/2007, PASSED BY THE FAMILY COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM IN O.P.(HMA) NO. 819/05. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE POLICE BEFORE JFMC, NEYYATTINKARA. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE COMPLAINTS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFOR ETHE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE COMPLAINTS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONR BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE COMPLAINTS SUBMITTD BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Rs/ J.B. Koshy,Ag.C.J. & V.Giri, J. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.5743 of 2009 K ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of February, 2009 Judgment Koshy, Ag.C.J. According to the petitioner, he divorced his wife, fourth respondent. In a petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, we are not expressing any opinion regarding the family disputes between the parties. Petition under article 226 is not an entitlement to raise allegations and counter allegations by the parties. Learned Government Pleader submitted that fourth respondent also filed a petition before the police. Without expressing any opinion regarding the merits of the inter se disputes between the petitioner and fourth respondent, we direct the police to see that law and order is maintained and lives of both parties are not endangered. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. J.B.Koshy Acting Chief Justice V. Giri Judge vaa