1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 4215 of 2011 Smt. Geetabai Yadavrao Deogire Vs. Sau. Dhrupadabai Govindrao Bhagwat and Others. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. V.S. Bapat Adv. for the petitioner. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK J. DATE : 16 th November, 2011. Shri Bapat, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the application dated 2.7.2011 was not properly prepared and it is not evident from the said application that the petitioner desires to tender secondary evidence of a document which the petitioner produced before the court or for that matter desires to produce before the court. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted by relying on a decision reported in AIR 2007 Bombay page 7 that the petitioner is desirous of filing an appropriate application before the court seeking permission to tender secondary evidence in regard to the certified copy of the Will deed dated 17.4.1989. In this background, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is desirous of withdrawing the writ petition and may be granted permission to withdraw the same. 2 Permission is granted. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE Hirekhan.