IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33231 of 2009 NAVIN SINGH @ NAVIN KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 03.02.2010 Heard. As per the report submitted by the learned trial court, nine witnesses have been examined out of thirteen named. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that eleven witnesses have, in fact, been examined and only two witnesses are left to be examined and those witnesses have also not supported the charges. For, the court has fixed a time frame for disposal of the case, i.e., up to April, 2010, the Court believes that the court below shall be comfortable in allowing itself to dispose of the case within the time frame fixed by it. On merits, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner in expectation that the trial of S.T. No. 380 of 2007/ 13 of 2008 pending in the court of Additional District & Sessions Judge, FTC II, Nalanda at Biharsharif within the time frame fixed by the trial court, else, the petitioner shall be released on bail by the court below itself on execution of a bond, amount and nature of which to be fixed by it. This application stands disposed of. Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)