IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 29TH JULY 2010 / 7TH SRAVANA 1932 RP.No. 571 of 2003 in CRP. No. 892/03 -------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER(S): REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: --------------------------------------------------- M.K. CHANDU, S/O. KANDAKUTTY, MANNAPPURATH HOUSE, KERALA STATE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD., 3RD FLOOR, CARMEL CENTRE, BANERJI ROAD, COCHIN-18. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS: --------------------------- 1. KERALAKSHEMAM UNIQUE KURIES (P) LTD., P.O. THRISSUR. 2. C. BHASKARAN, S/O. CHERUVALLY MADHAVAN KERALA STATE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD., 3RD FLOOR, CARMEL CENTRE, BANERJI ROAD, KOCHI - 18. 3. E.V. JOSE, S/O. ELUVATHINKAL VARGHESE, KERALA STATE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD., 3RD FLOOR, CARMEL CENTRE, BANERJI ROAD, KOCHI - 18. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ----------------------------------------------- RP. No. 571 of 2003 in CRP. No. 892 of 2003 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of July, 2010 O R D E R It is declared invoking Rule 51(2) of the High Court Rules that the respondent has been duly served. The RP need not be treated as defective. 2. The learned counsel for the review petitioner seeks time to contact the review petitioner. According to him, in all probability the issue between the parties has already been settled by the petitioner paying off the entire amount. I am not inclined to grant time. I don't find any infirmity about the order sought to be reviewed as envisaged by Rule 1 of Order 47 CPC. RP is dismissed. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) ksv/- -2- PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. RP. No. 571 of 2003 in CRP. No. 892 of 2003 O R D E R 29th July, 2010 -3-