CWP No. 1649 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 1649 of 2008 Date of decision: September 11, 2008 Narinder Singh --- Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ---- Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashutosh Mohunta Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta Present: Mr. RD Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.S.Chahal, DAG, Punjab, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. BS Randhawa, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. Mr. RK Girdhar, Advocate, for respondent No. 5. Ashutosh Mohunta, J. The petitioner applied for the post of Punjabi Master in the category of ESM (Dependent) General Male in response to the advertisement dated 10-6-2007. Grievance of the petitioner is that instead of considering him in the aforementioned category, his case was considered under ESM (D) SC Male category. Petitioner prays for issuance of directions to respondents No. 1 to 3 to give appointment to him as a Punjabi Master. Reply has been filed on behalf of respondent No.3, in para 10 of which it has been averred as under: CWP No. 1649 of 2008 2 That in response to para No. 10, it is stated that as per orders dated 31.3.2007 of Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in CWP No. 20234 of 2007 “Mamta Bansal and others Vs. State of Punjab and others”, a Selection Committee has been constituted by the Education Department to review the result of Punjabi Master/Mistress and final revised selection list will be issued after its approval”. Counsel for the State submits that as the selection committee has already been constituted by the Education Department to review the result of Punjabi Masters/ Mistresses, therefore, final revised list would be issued in the near future. In view of the aforementioned averments made in the reply, the case of the petitioner shall also be considered According to his category and entitlement. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. [Ashutosh Mohunta] Judge [Rajan Gupta] Judge September 11, 2008 `ask'