IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE ORIGINAL SIDE ORIGINAL SIDE NOTICE OF MOTION No. 2321 of 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL(Lodg) NO.1851 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearances,Court ’s : orders or directions & : Prothonotary’s orders. : ------------------------------------------------------------ Mr Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr B. D. Damodhar i/b Kanga & Co. Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. and V.C.DAGA, JJ. and V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008. DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008. DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Parties. 2. Perused Notice of Motion and affidavit in support thereof. 3. For the reasons stated in the Notice of Motion and affidavit in support thereof sufficient cause is made out for condoning delay of 120 days in filing the above appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant-applicant. Hence, the notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)