BEFORE THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ^ AT BILASPUR (C.G^ u ^A' M^.NO. t^ /2004 APPELLANT PETITIONER 7~ Dasrath, aged about 26 years, son of Shri Prabhulal Rajak, resident of Bastar Road, Sorid, Dhamtari, Tahsil and District Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENT ,^"J^ Smt. Saroj, wife of Shri 7^\^^^^^'^Dasrath Rajak, aged about y^^*\ ^y nr^ --^-^-^^ ^-^^-' aS.^9-' ^y 3 22 years, resident of - Bholaram Kundarapara, Shukrawari Bazar, Gudhiyari, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ^7" -" ^6^f3c ^-A^ i^fc4. MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL UNDER SECTION 28 OF THE ^ HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955. ^^ '^^.i •^^ ^^ v KIGH COURT OF CHHATTgSGAKH AT BILASPUR FIRST APPEAL N0. 197 GF 2004 \r APPBLLANT RESPGNDBgiT Dasratli Versias Snit. Sai-oj PIRST AFPEAL UNDER SECTiON 96 OF CPCR/W2S^OP THE HINDU MARmAGE ACT, 19S5 Saugle Beach: Hoa?b!e Shti G. rviiahaiuddia. J. Presesit; None for tlie appeUant. ORAL (Passed oa 29th day ofJuly, 2011) List is beiiig revised. Case called out twice. 2. No one 1s present to press fhls appeal. 3. In vlew of tiie above, I have no other option except to disiuiss tliis appeal iii tlie absence ofaiiy one for tlie appellaiit. 4. Tlieiefore, tlie appeal is disisiissed for non-piOsecutiorA, Sd/- G. Minhajuddin Judge Kvr ^JK^g-y-'^-