IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 17533 of 2008 Between: 1 Smt. Khaja Begum, W/o. late Mohd. Nasiruddin, R/o. H.No. 1--372, Station Road, Sirpur, Adilabad District. 2 Amina Ajmeeri Begum, D/o. late Mohd. Nasiruddin, R/o. H.No. 1--372, Station Road, Sirpur, Adilabad District. 3 Mohd. Naseeruddin, S/o. late Mohd. Nasiruddin, R/o. H.No. 1--372, Station Road, Sirpur, Adilabad District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, Adilabad District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Cum Land Acquisition Officer, Mancherial, Adilabad District. 3 The I.T.D.A. Officer, Utnoor, Adilabad District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in making the declaration vide Proc.No. B6/5084/2007 dated 4-1-2008 published in Gazette No. ADB/15/2008-2 dated 5-1- 2008 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Section 17 of Land Acquisition Act and also Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents to follow the procedure prescribed under the Land Acquisition Act 1894 and pass the award in respect of lands in Sy.NO. 479 and 480 to the extent of Acres. 17.24 gts situated at Parpally Village of Kotpally Mandal, Adilabad District. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.B.H.R.CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.17533 of 2008 Order: As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 08.06.2009, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today also, when the matter is called, none appeared for the petitioners nor is there any representation made on their behalf. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date:09.06.2009 VGB