1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1798 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.1768 OF 2004 Jain Irrigation Systems Ltd. Plaintiff versus Jyeshta Communications Pvt.Ld. and others Defendants Mr.Mohit Bhansali i/by S.B.Prabhavalkar for plaintiff. Mr.P.G.Lad for defendant nos.2 to 4. CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 16th March 2011 PC : 1. Heard learned advocate for the plaintiff. The learned advocate for the defendant nos.2 to 4 has no objection if the Chamber Summons is allowed. The advocate for the plaintiff states that the Official Liquidator who is appointed as Liquidator of defendant no.1 company is served with the copy of Chamber Summons. However, none appear for the Liquidator. In view thereof, the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c). Amendments to be carried out within two weeks from today. A copy of the amended plaint shall be forthwith forwarded by the advocate for the plaintiff to the Official Liquidator as well as to the advocate for the defendant nos.2 to 4. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)