1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Criminal Writ Petition No.562 of 2009. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|_______________________________________ 1. Heard. 2. Challenge in this petition is to order rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Biloli, in Criminal Revision No.19/2008. The learned Sessions Judge, was pleased to dismiss the Revision Application on concession. It is observed by the learned Sessions Judge that the learned advocate of the Revision Petitioner conceded that there was no merit in the Revision Application. The Revision Application was pressed into service initially on the ground that a lumpsum amount was given to the Respondent No.1 (wife) and she was given customary divorce. The learned Sessions Judge, noticed that such additional evidence was impermissible in the Revisional proceedings. This legal position was brought to the notice of the learned advocate appearing for the Revision Petitioner (husbabd). Thereupon the learned advocate of the Revision Petitioner before the Sessions Court fairly conceded that evidence of such kind was not placed on record before the trial Court. Thus, once the Revision Petition came to be dismissed on concession of the advocate and that the very fair ground of the Revision Petition was unavailable, there is no merit in the challenge to such order rendered by the Sessions Court in regard to the maintenance allowance which was enhanced by the trial Court. In this view of the matter, the petition is dismissed in limine. (V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) Dt.13.08.2009. asp/office/Crwp562.09