1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.416 OF 2006 Kashinath Baban Shinde. ..Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Uday P. Warunjikar for petitioner. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : JANUARY 23, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 23, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 23, 2007. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for the petitioner. 2. The fact that the finding given by the concerned authority in enquiry under Section 83 has been rendered recently, cannot be the basis to reckon the period of limitation. For the present action, which is contempt action, the date of act of commission or omission would be the relevant date for reckoning the limitation, that has happened long back. In the circumstances, this petition cannot proceed being barred by limitation. Hence, dismissed.