IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21253 of 2010 LALTU KUMAR @ LALAI KUMAR S/O Umesh Yadav, R/O Vill. Jirwa, P.O. Jurwa, P.S. Shankarpur, District Madhepura…………….Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR……………….. Opp. Party ----------- 2. 02.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 28.8.2009 in a case registered under Sections 394 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code It is submitted that the petitioner has been involved in the present case on the basis of the fact that the snatched motorcycle was used in Supaul P.S. Case No. 230 of 2009. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been acquitted in Supaul P.S. Case No. 230 of 2009 and the judgment of acquittal is contained in Annexure-2. It is further submitted that in Supaul P.S. Case No. 230 of 2009, the petitioner is in jail since 28.8.2009 whereas the alleged date of occurrence of the present case is 23rd July, 2009. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no other case at present except the present case being Bihra P.S. Case No. 100 of 2009. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that since the petitioner was involved in Supaul P.S. Case no. 230 of 200, hence on that basis he has been arrested. Considering the fact that the petitioner has not - 2 - named in any other case except the present one, let the petitioner above named be released on bail in connection with Bihra P.S. Case No. 100 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrae, Saharsa. It is made clear that the bail bond of the petitioner will not be accepted if the petitioner is involved in any other case apart from the present one and if the petitioner fails to appear on three consecutive dates in the present case during trial, the learned trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. Praveen (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)