IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2896 of 2010 PUSHKAR KUMAR Versus SMT. MANI DEVI ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Praphul Chandra Jha, Advocate For the opposite party : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Advocate ---- 6 19.01.2011 I.A. No. 77 of 2011 has been filed for condoning the delay of about 29 days in preferring the M.J.C. No. 2896 of 2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite party. From the averments made in paragraph nos. 2 and 3 it appears that the petitioner was prevented by sufficient cause from preferring this M.J.C. application within time. In above view of the matter the limitation petition bearing I.A. No. 77 of 2011 is allowed and the delay in filing of M.J.C. No. 2896 of 2010 is hereby condoned. Now I proceed to consider the M.J.C. No. 2896 of 2010 on its own merit. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for opposite party . This application has been filed for 2 restoration of C.R. No191/2007 which stood dismissed for want of prosecution on 30.4.2010. On being satisfied with the sufficiency of reasons mentioned in this application for omission on part of the petitioner, the same is allowed and the Civil Revision No. 191/2007 is restored to its original file and number. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)