1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 405 OF 2009. IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 406 OF 2009. The State of Maharashtra. ...Applicant. VERSUS. Rajendra @ Irrana Bassana Amare and others. ...Respondents. ------------------------------------------ Mr. N.R.Shaikh, A.P.P. for applicant. Mr.M.S.Kulkarni,Advocate for respondent nos.1 to5. ------------------------------------------ (CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR, J ) DATE : 7th September,2009. PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. There is delay of 145 days in filing the appeal. It is asserted that, the proposal was reached to the Law and Judiciary Department, Aurangabad. There took place time in presenting the matter. The delay is caused due to administrative problems. Moreover, it is stated that the trial court convicted the respondents, whereas the Appellate Court acquitted them. Therefore, there is good case made out. The delay appears to be unintentional. Hence, delay is condoned. 3. Having regard to the fact that, there are two contrary views taken by the Courts below, the leave to appeal is granted. 2 4. Admit. 5. Print is dispensed with. 6. Call for Record and proceedings. ( V.R.KINGAONKAR, J ) MTK/cri.405.09