IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 21ST AUGUST 2008 / 30TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 34652 of 2007(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. MISS AIMEY.P., BHAGYALAKSHMY GARDENS, SOUTH GATE, THIRUNAKKARA, KOTTAYAM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. DR.RAJESWARI. P.J., PRINCIPAL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION, VAIKOM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOBI JOSE KONDODY RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-629 001. 2. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 560, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 3. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM-686 560. 4. UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, MUTTOM P.O., THODUPUZHA-685 587, IDUKKI DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL. 5. MR.ANTONY GEORGE, IST YEAR ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, MUTTOM P.O., THODUPUZHA-685 587, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY FOR R2-4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.34652/2007 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of August, 2008 JUDGMENT The relief sought for in this writ petition is to direct the second respondent to admit the first petitioner in B. Tech Electronics and Communication Engineering in the 4th respondent college, under the 5% reservation set apart for the wards of MGU staff prescribed in Ext.P3 prospectus. 2. The very basis of the claim raised by the petitioner was that the first option of the 5th respondent, who has been admitted in Electronics and Communication was IT. It is their case that in the vacancy available in IT, if the 5th respondent is accommodated, there will be a consequential vacancy in the Electronics and Communication branch, to which the petitioner can be accommodated. WP(c).No.34652/2007 2 3. It has now come out from the submissions made by the counsel for the University that the 5th respondent had not opted for IT as claimed in the writ petition. According to him, therefore, there is no further seats available in Electronics and Communication Branch to which the petitioner can claim to be accommodated. Writ Petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. WP(c).No.34652/2007 3