Lrs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10469 OF 2009 The Secretary Shad Adam Shaikh Trust & Ors .. Petitioners. vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents. Mr A.G.Kothari , Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr V.S.Masurkar A.G.P., for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Ms Beena Menon, Advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED : 18TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C. Rule. Heard forthwith by consent of parties. The petitioners’ grievance is that in response to the show cause notice issued by the respondent No.3, they have removed the deficiencies and informed the Respondent Nos.2 and 3. Inspite of that till date no action has been taken. Considering the controversy, Respondent No.2 is directed to carry out inspection and thereafter submit a fresh report to the Respondent no.3 at any rate not later than two months. On submitting the report to the Respondent No.3, he will take decision in accordance with law and communicate it to the petitioners within two months. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (K.K.TATED, J.) (F,I. REBELLO,J.)