IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.28716 of 2010 Between: Aravabhoomi Chandra Sekhar Reddy ..... Petitioner AND Sri Chengallamma Parameswari Ammavari Devastanam, Sullurpet, P.S.Nellore District & others. .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri M. Vidyasagar Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri V.T.M. Prasad Counsel for respondents 2&3: GP for Endowments The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.28716 of 2010 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 i.e., (1) Sri Chengallamma Parameswari Ammavari Devastanam, Sullurpet, P.S. Nellore District rep., by its Executive Officer & (2) The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Nellore in not permitting the petitioner to function as a member of the founder’s family to Sri Chengallamma Parameswari Ammavari Devastanam, Sullurpet, P.S. Nellore District in pursuance of the orders passed in O.A.No.28/2006, dated 17.05.2008 and the orders of the Commissioner of Endowments, A.P. Hyderabad passed in Rc.No.DP1/45124/09, dated 03.09.2010.” At the hearing, it is agreed among the learned counsel for the parties that the order of respondent No.3 permitting the petitioner to act as founder family member of respondent No.1 based on which this Court granted interim order dated 19.11.2010 was subsequently recalled by the A.P. Dharmika Parishad on 22.11.2010 and that assailing the said order, the petitioner filed Writ Petition No.30737 of 2010. Inasmuch as the very order, which created cause of action to file the present Writ Petition, has been recalled by the competent authority, the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to pursue Writ Petition No.30737 of 2010. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition as infructuous, WPMP Nos.36632, 951 and 40436 of 2010 and WVMP.Nos.5622 and 6160 of 2010 are disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 08.03.2011 ES