IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28958 of 2010 BIRENDRA KUMAR YADAV Versus SATTE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 09.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 120(B) of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the Bihar Conduct of Examination Act. It is alleged that one Bhramchari Sharma found appearing in the examination of Kendriya Chayan Parishad impersonating this petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was not found doing any illegal act and he has no knowledge him being impersonated by some one else. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner was the actual beneficiary of the alleged impersonation. Considering the fact that the petitioner was not found on spot of impersonation, let the petitioner, Birendra Kumar Yadav, be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned 2 court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Mahesh Khutt P.S. Case No. 48 of 2010, G.R. No. 471 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Khagaria, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. It is made clear that the petitioner will make himself available to the investigating agency regularly and if he fails to appear before the investigating agency during the investigation then the investigating agency will be at liberty to file cancellation of bail of the petitioner. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)