HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33232 of 2010 Date : 24.01.2011 Between : Kaja Kishore Kumar. …..Petitioner And Government of A.P., rep. by its Secretary, Home Department & others. …..Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33232 of 2010 ORDER : This writ petition is filed, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing respondents 1 to 3 to take necessary action on his complaint, dated 30.11.2010, by providing police protection to him. The petitioner claims that he is the owner of the house property bearing Door No.65-5-25, situated at Mohan Nagar, Kakinada. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has mortgaged the said property in favour of one Tadi Venkata Ramakrishna Reddy, who has illegally entered into an agreement of sale with respondents 4 to 7. It is stated that inspite of filing complaint before the Police on 30.11.2010, no steps have been taken by the Police in the matter. On instructions, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader for Home that the complaint, dated 30.11.2010, is not received by the 3rd respondent. However, the learned counsel for petitioner has produced a Xerox copy of the acknowledgement, in token of receipt of his complaint by the 2nd respondent-Superintendent of Police. In this case, there is no material to show that the petitioner has lodged complaint before the 3rd respondent- Station House Officer, Timmapuram P.S., in the absence of which, there was no occasion for him to examine the contents of the said complaint, so as to take further steps. In that view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, permitting the petitioner to submit another copy of the complaint, dated 30.11.2010, before the 3rd respondent-Station House Officer, within a period of two weeks from today. If such complaint is filed, the 3rd respondent is directed to examine its contents, and if any offence is committed by respondents 4 to 7, the 3rd respondent hall take steps in accordance with law. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 24th January 2011 ajr