1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.589/09. Vitthaldas and Others. VERSUS Smt.Sumitra Devi and Others. 22.01.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Kuldeep Verma, for the petitioners. ***** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order. The contentions which have been raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners relate to the merits of the case as to whether the defendants who have been transposed as the plaintiffs based upon the fact that their father was alive and also on account of the amendment having been introduced to the Hindu Succession Act only w.e.f. 20.12.2004. So far as the above contentions are concerned, suffice it to say that the daughters are already defendants in the suit and all that has been done is that they have been transposed as the plaintiff. So far as the merits of the contentions and the objection with regard to the rights of the daughters and whether or not the father could have released the share of the daughters in favour of the petitioner is concerned the aforesaid matter is to be considered at trial. 2 In the facts and circumstances, I find no good ground to interfere in the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.