IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:24-10-2008 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. CHANDRU WRIT PETITION No.38418 of 2002 an M.P.No.57443 of 2002 D. Balaraman ... Petitioner vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep by the Secretary Housing & Urban Development Dept Fort St.George, Chennai-9 2. The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition (Unit III) Tamil Nadu Housing Board Scheme Chennai-600 035 3. The Tamil Nadu Housing Board by the Managing Director 331, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-35 ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent in Letter No.2116/N1.A2(1)98-12 dt.25.04.2001 on his file, quash the same and direct him to transfer the petitioner's lands in S.Nos.101/7 (southern 18 cents) 101/10 (3 cents) and 101/11 (4.75 cents) in 140 Thiruvanmiyur village, Chennai to the petitioner u/s 48-B of the Land Acquisition Act 1984. For petitioner : Ms.Hema Sampth SC for R. Subramanian For respondents : Mr.A. Arumugam 1&2 ORDER The petitioner seeks for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent in Letter No.2116/N1.A2 (1)98-12 dt.25.04.2001 on his file, quash the same and direct him to transfer the petitioner's lands in S.Nos.101/7 (southern 18 cents) 101/10 (3 cents) and 101/11 (4.75 cents) in 140 Thiruvanmiyur village, Chennai to the petitioner u/s 48-B of the Land Acquisition Act 1984. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. Ms.Hema Sampath, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, after making submissions on the impugned order, states that the materials, which are now produced before the Court were not originally available with them to be placed before the respondent State. Therefore, she seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition and to file further petition to review the order dated 25.4.2001 in letter No.2116/N.A.2(1)98-12. 3. In the light of the above submission made by the learned senior counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner is at liberty to agitate the entire issue before Government for a proper review of their order. No costs. Consequently, the connected M.P is closed. 4. The order of dismissal will not stand in any way of the Government in considering the representation of the petitioner. Sd/- Asst. Registrar. /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar. sr To 1.The Secretary Housing & Urban Development Dept Fort St.George, Chennai-9 2. The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition (Unit III) Tamil Nadu Housing Board Scheme Chennai-600 035 3. The Tamil Nadu Housing Board by the Managing Director 331, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-35 + 2 CC to the Government Pleader, SR NO.59916, 58410 + 1 CC to Mr.A.Vijayakumar, Advocate, SR NO.59632 + 1 CC to Mr.R.Subramanian, Advocate, SR NO.59485 W.P.NO.38418 of 2002 SJ [CO] RB 3/11/2008 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/