BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Seventh day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH CRL OP(MD) No.12805 of 2011 1. A.KHAN MOHAMMED 2. A.RAFIQ MOHAIDEEN 3. V.R.RAMESH 4. K.NATARAJAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL IN CR.NO. 66 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under sections 147, 447, 427, 294(b), 341, 506(i) and 379 (N.P) of I.P.C., in Crime No.66 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that A1 has been arrested and he is the main accused. Insofar as these petitioners are concerned, the only allegations made against them in the complaint is that on 7.8.2011 A1 along with the petitioners entered into the property of the defacto complainant and damaged the standing crops and also threatened him. He further submitted that the earlier anticipatory bail was closed, in view of the fact that there was only a petition enquiry was pending at the relevant point of time. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor on instructions submitted that the petitioners are said to have been damaged the property worth about Rs.1,00,000/-. 4. A perusal of the complaint would show that the overt act attributed against the petitioners is that on 07.08.2011 these https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioners along with A1 have entered into the land of the defacto complainant and damaged the standing crops. The further allegation is that the petitioners along with A1 have used filthy language and also threatened the defacto complainant. 5.Considering the fact that A1 has already been arrested and also considering the overt act attributed against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 27/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, DINDIGUL. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate SR.No.33354 SR : 28.09.2011 : 2P/6C : IT ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12805 of 2011 Date :27/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/