IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 3842 of 2007 Date of Decision: 24.10. 2008 Girraj and another ...... Appellants Versus Smt.Krishna and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Kulvir Narwal, Advocate for the appellants. **** Ajay Tewari, J. This appeal has been filed against the concurrent finding of fact holding that the mother of the appellants had the right to make sale in favour of respondents No. 1 and 2 and that the plaintiff-appellants could not challenge the same since at an earlier stage plaintiff-appellant Girraj had himself attested as a witness the mortgage of the same property by his mother and was thus estopped from challenging the right of the mother. Learned counsel for the appellants has not been able to persuade me that this finding is either perverse or does not arise from the evidence led before the Courts below. In this view of the matter I hold that the questions proposed do not arise for decision of this appeal. Consequently the same is dismissed. No costs. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE October 24 , 2008 sunita