1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.643 OF 2004 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.487 OF 2001 Tilaknagar Industries Limited .....Appellant V/s. Rairu Distillaries Limited ..... Respondent WITH APPEAL NO.23 OF 2005 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.458 OF 2001 Rairu Distillaries Limited .....Appellant V/s. Tilaknagar Industries Limited ..... Respondent Mr.Mayur Khandeparkar i/by M/s.Kanga & Co., for the petitioner in Appeal No.643 of 2004 and for the respondent in Appeal No.23 of 2005. Ms.Kusum Joshi i/by Mulla & Mulla and Craigie Blunt & Caroe, for the respondent in Appeal No.643 of 2004 and for the petitioner in Appeal No. 23 of 2005. CORAM :P.B.MAJMUDAR & R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATE : JUNE 17, 2009 P.C. 1. It is pointed out by both the learned counsel appearing in the matter that the parties have settled the dispute out of court. The consent terms duly signed by the parties and their respective Advocates is 2 taken on record and marked as Exh.X for identification. The signatories of the consent terms are present in the Court. It is submitted that the parties shall abide by the consent terms. It is further submitted that in view of Clause (I) of the consent terms, both these appeals are to be withdrawn. Accordingly, while taking the consent terms on record, the Appeals are permitted to withdrawn in view of the consent terms arrived at by the parties in this behalf. Appeals are accordingly disposed of as withdrawn, with no order as to costs. ( R.M.SAVANT, J. ) (P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)