- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2642 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO.2474 OF 2004 ... Kumar Aditya ...Plaintiff v/s. S.R.V.Production & Anr. ...Defendants ... Mr.A.Y. Bookwala i/b Ranjit & Co. for the Plaintiff. Mr.V.Y.Sanglikar i/b K.J. Shobhawat for the Defendants. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 29TH SEPTEMBER,2005 - 2 - P.C.: Perused the record. Heard the learned Counsel for both sides. Perused the Commissioner’s report. It is submitted by the Commissioner pursuant to the order made by this Court. In view of the report submitted by the Commissioner, ad-interim order dated 2-12-2004 is confirmed. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the Defendants submits that this court should not rely on the Commissioner’s report as the Commissioner did not follow the directions issued by this Court in watching the movie. In my opinion, whether the Commissioner is correct or not, cannot be gone into at this stage, as the Commissioner was appointed by this Court and the Commissioner has submitted his report. At this prima facie stage, the court will have to go by the Commissioner’s report. 3. Notice of Motion disposed of. ...