IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46391 of 2009 SANJEET @ SANJEEV @ SANJEEV CHAUDHARY, Son of Siyaram Chaudhary, resident of Village-Chakwa, P.O. Manikchawk, P.S. Raunni Saidpur, District-Sitamarhi............................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR.............................................Opposite Party. ----------- 02. 01.02.2010. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, complainant and counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that earlier to this complaint petition, a divorce case was filed on his behalf on the ground of cruelty and desertion of the complainant which ended into compromise after payment of a handsome amount though no final decree can be passed in divorce case on refusal of the complainant the compromise but the fact remained intact that divorce case was filed earlier and further submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in divorce case consent was not accepted rather divorce was resisted only to force the petitioner to pay more money but in any case in my view also the refusal of anticipatory bail can not be justified. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 2794 of 2008 and Trial No. 2503 of 2009 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D. J. M. East Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. U.K. (Mandhata Singh,J)