IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 26877 of 2003 Between: G.Muralidhar Reddy, s/o.late Janardhan Reddy, Aged about 30 years, R/o.Brahmankotkur, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of A.P., rep. by the Secretary, Legislative Affairs and Justice Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Collector, Kurnool District 3 V.Nagalakshmi Devi, W/o. not known, aged not known, working as Additional Public Prosecutor, Family court-Cum-IV Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction, particularly in the nature of mandamus or any other writ, declaring that the 3rd respondent is not eligible to be continued as Additional Public Prosecutor for the court of Family court-cum-IV Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.R.AVULA, Advocate Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Mr. K. Suresh Reddy, Advocate The Court made the following: ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that in view of the orders passed by the Government in G.O.Rt.No.373, Dated 21.2.2004, the subject matter of this Writ Petition has become infructuous. The said G.O.Rt.No.373, dated 21.2.2004 is placed on record. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. _____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 01st July, 2004. Ys 1 The Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh Legislative Affairs and Justice Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Collector, Kurnool district 3 Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Home, High Court Buildings, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 4 Two C.D. Copies.