IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY, 2009/22ND MAGHA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 519 of 2009() ----------------------------- CRA.805/2006 of SESSIONS COURT, KOTTAYAM ST.71/2006 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, I, KOTTAYAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT ------------------------------ DAVIDSON, POLICE CONSTABLE, ERATTUPETTA POLICE NSTATION, ERATTUPETTA WORKING IN CHANGANACHERRY POLICE STATION. BY ADV. SRI.JAMES KURIAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. 2. M.P.ANILKUMAR, MANJAPPALLILKUNNEL HOUSE AYARKUNNAM P.O.,KOTTAYAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. JAYAKRISHNAN SRI.SANTHOSH MODAYIL FOR R2 SRI.BIJUMON JACOB FOR R2 THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P. No. 519 of 2009 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 11-02-2009 ORDER The accused in S.T. No. 71 of 2006 on the file of the J.F.C.M.I, Kottayam for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.No. 1535 of 2009 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. Dated this the 11 th day of February, 2009. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani.