1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR P.I.L. NO. 34 OF 2010. The Court on its own motion .vs. The State of Maharashtra & others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. D.V. Chauhan, Advocate (Amicus Curiae) for petitioner, Mrs. B.H. Dangre, Addl. G.P. for respondent nos. 1,2 & 8, Mr. S.K. Mishra, A.S.G.I. for respondent no. 3, Mr. Khandalkar, Advocate for respondent no.4. CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 20, 2010. Dr. Ramteke, Senior Scientist from the NEERI has been deputed by the Director, NEERI to appear in this matter. He states that there has been a communication gap. Hereafter he will ensure that necessary instructions are given to the Assistant Solicitor General of India. He seeks time to file reply in this case. S.O. to 24.11.2010. C.A.O. NO. 1161 OF 2010 : Mr. B.G. Kulkarni, learned Advocate for applicants, submits that the applicants/intervenors have 2 knowledge of why the construction is going on in the area and they have provided technological knowhow for the said construction and the laboratory therein. The knowhow is not in question in the petition. The P.D.K.V. which is appearing and has made construction on the area is a party before this Court and is in the best position to explain the circumstances. Hence, intervention is rejected. S.O. to 24.11.2010. Steno-copy of order is granted. Judge Judge. J.