: 1 : Review Petn-31-11=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.31 OF 2011 IN SUIT NO. 805 OF 2002 Deepak Fertilisers and Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. .. Petitioners v/s. Suryakant Ambalal Patel & Anr. .. Respondents ......... Mr. S.V. Doijode i/b Doijode Associates for the petitioners ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 5th MAY, 2011 P.C. : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner on the question of review of Judgment delivered by me in the aforesaid Suit on 21st February, 2011. 2. I have perused the grounds stated by the learned Counsel for the petitioner in the review petition. I have heard learned Counsel on the question of points raised by him in the review petition. : 2 : Review Petn-31-11=.sxw 3. The Court while delivering the judgment has observed that Indian Bank was entitled to hold the debentures as per orders of Company Court. The Court has observed that because the register of debentures maintained by petitioner was not mutated and name of Indian Bank was not incorporated in the register of debenture holder and name of the defendants stood in the register of debenture holders, payment of interest of defendants cannot be treated as wrong payment. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner made efforts to point out that the view taken by me in the impugned judgment is contrary to the orders passed by this High Court in the Company Court. In my view, this would provide a ground for appeal and not for review of the petition. Accordingly, Review Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)