cF, 'vo BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Writ Petition I'S) No. 2.55 S / 2007 Petitioner /••'/l'?.' Respondents / Ramji Marar, aged about 45 l^ years, son of Shri Jhaduraia Marar, resident of Gudhiyari, P.S. Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.), at present workuig at Murali Hotel, BUaspur (C.G.) VERSUS /l. The State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough -fhe Secretary, Departnient of Home Affairs, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) ^. The District CoUector, Distt. Korea (Chhattisgarh) 3. The Superintendent of PoUce, Korea, Manendragarh, District Korea (C.G.) 4. Mangal Das, son of Shri Meghnath, working as Loader, through Sub Area Manager, SECL Chirimiri Comery, District Korca (Chhattisgarh) / 5. Rara Das, son of Shri Meghnath, workmg as - Loader, fhrough Sub Area Manager, SECL Chirimiri CoUiery, District Korea (C.G.) VIQNI d0 NOUnj-USNOO 3HJ, jo 9ee sa^^uHv aaaNn Nouuad AMM (OO) 13310^ tOTJlSIQ 'Al3T]J03 Tjniiuiq3 ^ajy CL1ts 'j3§Btrep\[ §UTUT]A[ J3PI3 3tp T.iSnojip 'pa^iimq sppgfBOQ ujg-^SBg Tpnog •g COURT '.V. P. (5) P.R. No. 2056 of 2007 Ramji Mara", aged about 45 years, son of Shri Jhadurom Marar, resident of iSudhiyori, P.5. Sarangarh, bistrict Raigarh (C.G.], at present working at Murali Hotel, Bilaspur (C.6.) 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through- the Secretary, bepartment of Home Affairs, bau Kdyan Sinqh ihawan, Mantrdaya, Raipur (C.6.) 2. The &istriet Collector-, Distt. Korea (ChhattiS9<rh) 3. The Superintendent of Police.Korea, Mafiendraqarh, bistrict Korea (C.S.) Das, son of Shri Meghnath. Loader, through Sub Area ttansgef", SECL Chinmiri Colliery.. bistrict Korea (Chhattisg.ar'h) Ram Das. son of Shri Meghnat+i, working QS - Loader, throuqh Sub Area iVionGger, SECL Chirmiri Coliierv, bistrict Kores /i- ,'a v I^.V.) 6. South Eastern Coaifietds Limited. throuqh the Chief Mininq Manaqer", 5ub Areo Chirimiri Coliiery. &istrict Korea (C6) .!,• ?9A vrt Single Bench: Hon'ble Justice Shri Sutish K. Agnihotri. Present; Mr. K.R. Nair. Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawiyer for the State/respondents No. lto3. :?s .th (Passed on this 18" Doy of April, 2007) I.A. No. 01, this i: lication for withdi-aw Subhnsh the ground stated therein. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent has no objection. The appiication is ordered as prayed 'for. 2. The writ petifton is occordingly dismissed os withdrawn. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge