Criminal Misc. No. 15697-M of 2011(O&M) Satpal @ Bindra vs. The State of Haryana Present: Mr. H.P.S.Aulakh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana for the respondent-State. *** The petitioner had filed an application for bail which was dismissed as withdrawn on 13.01.2011. Thereafter, the statements of eye witnesses Sonu and complainant Ram Niwas appears to have been recorded on 17.02.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner, referring to the statements of the said witnesses has submitted that the petitioner has neither been attributed any injury nor he has been attributed any over tract. This petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek concession of regular bail on the basis of the changed circumstances. The disposal of the earlier application for bail prior to the recording of the statements of the above said witnesses will not in any manner prejudice the right of the petitioner. [M.M.S.BEDI] JUDGE 24th August, 2011 Shivani Kaushik