1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR C.A. NO. 3436/04 IN M.C.A. ST. NO. 10613/04 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 24125/03 United India Insurance Co. Ltd. .vs. Smt. Gumphabai R. Kolse & others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATE : 18 th FEBRUARY, 2010. Heard Mr. D.N. Kukday, learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr. A.I. Sheikh, learned Counsel holding for Mr. Mirza, learned Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2. Respondent nos. 4, 5 & 6 though served, none appears for them. The delay caused is of 100 days. The learned Advocate Mr. Kukday submits that the delay caused is because of the procedural difficulties which are mentioned in paragraph no.1. He further submits that the delay caused is purely unintentional and because of the procedural and administrative difficulties. Mr. A.I. Sheikh, learned Counsel holding for Mr. 2 Mirza, learned Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2, vehemently opposes the application. In my opinion, the reasons stated in the application are good and sufficient to condone the delay. The delay is condoned and application is allowed, subject to payment of costs of Rs.500/-. Costs to be deposited within two weeks. Judge J.