1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.4105/2007 (Mohan Ram & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : September 26, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Ranjeet Joshi, for the petitioners. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the bail application filed by petitioner No.2 Kana Ram. The bail application filed by petitioner No.2 Kana Ram s/o Mohan Ram under section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the challan papers. I have also gone through the statement of injured Poonam Chand. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the injured eye-witness Poonam Chand has assigned injuries to petitioner No.1 Mohan Ram, however, there is an omnibus statement. So far as causing injury to the deceased is concerned, it has not been assigned to petitioner No.1 Mohan 2 Ram. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that no injury has been caused by petitioner No.1 Mohan Ram to the deceased, I consider it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner No.1 Mohan Ram on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed by petitioner No.1 Mohan Ram under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner No.1 Mohan Ram s/o Mhega Ram be released on bail in FIR No.34/2007, P.S. Shri Balaji, Distt. Nagaur provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-