IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 7TH JUNE 2011 / 17TH JYAISHTA 1933 OP(C).No. 1804 of 2011(O) I.A.NO.422/2011 IN APPEAL NO.288/2011 OF TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PETITIONER: 2ND RESPONDENT: -------------------- T.S.ASHOK, S/O.THANKAPPAN NAIR, TC.5/1553, VAZHUTHACAUD, TRIVANDRUM, MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S.ARTECH REALTORS (P) LTD. BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR SRI.A.JANI(KOLLAM) RESPONDENT: APPELLANT: --------------- ALEX THOMPSON, S/O.THOMPSON, KENNY COTTAGE, K.V.NAGAR - 65, THOPPIL KADAVU, KOLLAM - 12. THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------- O.P.(C)No. 1804 of 2011 O ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of June, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges Ext.P8 order in I.A.No.422 of 2011 in Appeal No.288 of 2011, on the file of the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions, Thiruvananthapuram. Ext.P8 order was passed on 25.4.2011. The appeal, in which the order was passed, was filed on 25.4.2011. That means, Ext.P8 is an ad interim order. The petitioner filed objections in I.A.No.422 of 2011. It is pointed out that there was no ground for granting the ad interim order. When objections are filed and the respondents contend that there is no ground for granting the interim order of injunction, the Tribunal is bound to consider the same and pass appropriate orders. It is not necessary to examine the validity or otherwise of Ext.P8 order in this Original Petition. The Tribunal shall dispose of I.A.No.422 of 2011 in Appeal No.288 of 2011 as expeditiously O.P.(C) NO.1804 OF 2011 :: 2 :: as possible and, at any rate, within a period of one month, after affording an opportunity of being heard to both parties. The Original Petition is disposed of as above. Issue certified copy of the judgment today itself. K.T.SANKARAN Judge ahz/