@3‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition (C)N0. 2809 of 2008 PETITIONER Mls. Durga Carriers Private Limited, A Company registered under the Indian Companies Act; 1956 through its Director having registered Office Near Kisan Rice Mi“, Baloda Bazaar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Versus 1. Siate of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Depa‘ltment of Mines and Minerals, Mantraiay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Coiiector, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Sanjay Kumar Sehgai, S/o. Satpai Sehgal, R10. Punjabi Colony, Katora Talab, Post Office Bairan Bazaar. Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgerh. RESPONDENTS 4. Kapil Agrawal, Slo. K.P. Agrawai, R/o. C-66/4, Devendra Nagar, Raipur, Tehsil & District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of indie.) SB: Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Aiok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for the State. a ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 30‘“ day orJuiy, 2008) » Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merit at this stage. However, the petitioner submits that the respondents No. 1 and 2 lStete may be directed to consider the pending representation dated 9-1-2008 in accordance .with law, on its own merit, expeditiously. 2) Shri Alok Bakshi, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the respondents No.11 and 2/State submib that if any representation is pending consideration, r thesame shallbe considered and disposed of as early as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks. / /,, / 3) In View ‘of clear and categmical statement made by learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the State, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing suryives in this petition. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 4) Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Raju l