IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2267 of 2010 SHIV KUMAR PRASAD, S/o Sri Jagat Ram, a resident of 77-A, Police Colony, Section A, P.S. Gardanibagh, District- Patna. Previously posted as Commercial Inspector Grade-1 HQ at Laheriasarai, District- Darbhanga, Samastipur Division, E.C. Railway under Divisional Commercial Manager, Samastipur. …… Petitioner. Versus 1. UNION OF INDIA, through the Divisional Rly. Manager, EC Rly., Samastipur, Samastipur Division (Bihar), now Union of India, through the General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur, District- Vaishali. 2. Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, Samastipur. 3. Divisional Railway Manager (Personnel), East Central Railway, Samastipur. 4. Divisional Commercial Manager, East Central Railway, Samastipur. 5. Priyadarshi Sujit. 6. Sanjeev Raman. 7. Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna. ….. Opp. Parties. ----------- 03- 29.9.2010 Heard Mr. A.B. Ojha for the petitioner, and Mr. Hemendra Prasad Singh for the opposite parties. This modification application has been filed by the petitioner of C.W.J.C. No. 13342 of 2005, which was allowed by our judgment dated 13.4.2010. This application has been filed with the prayer to correct the three typographical errors in the judgment, and to incorporate one omission in the operative portion of the judgment. 2. We have perused the materials on record and considered the connected writ petition. We have also perused the judgment dated 13.4.2010, whereby we have allowed the analogous C.W.J.C. No.4755 of 2006. Both the 2 writ petitions were directed against the common order passed by the authorities, and a common order passed by the Tribunal. We are convinced that the prayer sought for in this application is fit to be granted. We accordingly direct modification of our judgment dated 13.4.2010, passed in C.W.J.C. No.13342 of 2005, in the following manner: (i) The pay-scale of Rs.1600-2660/- occurring in the 5th line of paragraph 3, page 2, of the judgment, should be read as Rs.2000-3200/-. (ii) The expression „Tribe‟ occurring in 10th line of paragraph 3, page 2, should be corrected to read as „Caste‟. (iii) The scale of Rs.6500-10500/- occurring in 29th line of paragraph 3, page 3, should be corrected to read as Rs.5500-9000/- . (iv) The sentence „The petitioner will be entitled to all consequential benefits‟, should be inserted in the sixth line of page-5, paragraph 6, of the judgment in between the words “…relate to the petitioner” and “In the facts and circumstances of the case...”. 3. This application is accordingly disposed of. (S K Katriar, J.) (Kishore K. Mandal, J.) S.K.Pathak/