IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH JULY 2009 / 7TH SRAVANA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 4151 of 2009() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.419/2009 OF VATANAPPILY POLICE STATION PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.5 & 6 ------------------------------------------------ 1. JIJEJ, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.PRAKASAN, PULICKAL HOUSE, CHERKKARA P.O., NATTIKA, THRISSUR. 2. CHINESE SHANU @ SHANAVAS, AGED 20 YEARS, S/O.SHAJAHAN, KANNAN CHAKKASERY, KOPRAKKALAM, THALIKKULAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.M.B.PRAJITH RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------- 1. STATE REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VATANAPPILY POLICE STATION, (CRIME NO.419 OF 2009), THRISSUR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.TEKCHAND THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. --------------------------------------------- B.A.No.4151 of 2009 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of July, 2009 ORDER This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are accused Nos.5 and 6 in Crime No.419 of 2009 of Vatanappilly Police Station. 2. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 324 and 308 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. I have gone through the case diary. 4. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the offence, the injury sustained and other circumstances, I do not think this is a fit case where the petitioners are entitled to the discretionary relief under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Bail Application is accordingly dismissed. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE csl