IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 17TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29605 of 2011(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. M.ABDUL NAZAR, S/O MAYINKUTTY, MULLAPPALLY HOUSE, PALAZHI, PO G.A. COLLEGE, KOZHIKKODE-14 2. MOHAMMED KOYA, 'HAJASAR', ELATHUR, VENGALAM, KOZHIKKODE. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN SMT.R.PADMAKUMARI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANPORT AUTHORITY CUM REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, KOZHIKKODE-673 020. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.G.GOPAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No. 29605/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DTD. 30.09.2010 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL /True Copy/ vps PA to Judge P.N.RAVINDRAN, J -------------------------- W.P.(C). No.29605 of 2011 -------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of November, 2011. J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed for an order directing the respondent to consider Ext.P1 application dated 30.9.2010, jointly filed by the petitioners for variation of the time schedule of their respective stage carriages. When this writ petition came up for admission hearing today, on being confronted with Rule 214 of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that petitioners are not pursuing Ext.P1 or this writ petition and that leaving upon their right to move the respondent by filing separate applications seeking variation of the time schedule of their respective stage carriages, this writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. In the light of the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty with the petitioners to file separate applications before the respondent seeking variation of the time schedule of their respective stage carriages. Consequently, Ext.P1 shall stand stuck off. P.N.RAVINDRAN (JUDGE) vps