IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9502 of 2009 1.ASHOK BAITHA S/O-Mahanth Baitha, R/O-Vill-Hathini, P.S.-Nokha, Distt.-Rohtas. 2.GHURAHU KAHAR @ NAGENDRA SINGH CHANDRABANSI @ TUFAN @ DHARMENDRA S/O-Gaya Kahar @ Gaya Chandrabansi, R/O-Vill-Khairhi, P.S.-Nokha, Distt.-Rohtas. …………………………………………..Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………………………………………..Opposite Party. WITH Cr.Misc. No.15588 of 2009 SURENDRA PASWAN @ SURENDRA RAM S/O-Late Ram Ekbal Ram, R/O-Vill-Kawakhonch, P.S.-Kargahar, Distt.-Rohtas. …………………………………………..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………………………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 3/ 04.08.2009 Since both the above bail applications have arisen out of one occurrence which has led to registration of the FIR against 9 named and 5-6 unnamed under Sections 364/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Allegation is that the informant and Bhim Singh were intercepted. The informant rescued himself but Bhim Singh was carried away. Subsequently, his dead body was found. Submission is that none of the petitioners are named in the FIR. After long interval a protest-cum-complaint petition was 2 filed and in the same also the petitioners are not named. At belated stage the accused Surendra Paswan is alleged to have made a confession naming himself and others. The witnesses have stated that motive of killing was different because the deceased was having illicit relationship with a lady and there was possibility that the informant might have killed him. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned court Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Kargahar P.S. Case No.- 169 of 2007. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)