IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.343 of 2009 Abdul Kasim Versus Aklu Das ---------------------------------- 4. 13.12.2011 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. By the impugned order the Court below has rejected the Miscellaneous Case No. 12 of 2003 holding the same to be barred by limitation. The learned Court below has recorded the finding that the medical certificate produced by the petitioner for condonation of delay is not fit to be relied up and on that basis the prayer for condonation of delay has been rejected. After perusing the impugned order and considering the submissions on behalf of the petitioner it appears that the learned Court below had recorded a finding of fact and the same is not fit to be interfered in the revisional jurisdiction. As such, the revision application is dismissed. It goes without saying that the petitioner shall be at liberty to opt for any other recourse open to him in accordance with law. Saif/- (V. Nath, J.)