XI‘HC—78 WW,W,W WW (W) WWW % Emma-m: mmm mmwiwm $af§mm HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c; Nuns/2006 Single Bench APPELLANT$ CLAIMANTS RESPONDENT NON-APPLICANTS Pxesent: MISC. APPE on’ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra, J 1. Smt.Puna Bai, Wd/ o Tiku Ram Dhruv, Agad about 45 yrs‘ . Smt'. H/irmautin Bai, Wd/o 'Tiku Ram Dhxuvg aged abltout 36 yrs, S. Chhabi Lal, S/o Tiku Ram Dhruv, aged about 16 yr$. 4. K11. Gallga, D/o Tiku Ram Dhruv, agsd about 5 yrs, Appellant mas. 3 8r, 4 are represented by legal guardian mother Smt. Hjrmautin Bai. All Rio Vill. Barbhata, RC). Basin, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) V' ERSUS Tej Ram Yadav, S/o Gowardhan, Yadav, R/o Torala, Post Bhuraka, RS. Nawagaon, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Arendra Kumar Pahadia, S/o Nemichand Pahadia, R/o Sadar Bazar Nawapara, Rajim, Distt. Raipur (CG) The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. By Divisional Mauager, Mandal No.1, the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Jail Road, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Dunsel for the appellants, / / L W m..CD/az V .in 200 L Mr. S.C. Verma, c M‘ ’CU/?3 ; in 200g Wm (W) WWW WWWKWW WWW wmm §?afma11é¥l Mrs. China Shrix No.3] Insurance Co: counsd for respondant 07.05 .2007 Heard on MC‘RNG, 1608 0f delay 1'11 filing thi$ appeal as 1 of 88 days as p€r offics not€ dat Tha groundg taken by t1 Le appellantS for fllillg this appéal belatsdly are that the appaHan ts wers not aware of the fact that there is any limitation for f ' sufficient fund to initiate leg impugned award. The reasons assigned m the application for condonatiori of delay canlmt he considered to be a ground much less sufflcient Even otherwise, from perusal of bsewed that the Tribunal after assessing the income of the cle eased at Rs.2,000/ - per month, age of the deceased 55 years aici applying multiplier of ll, has awarded a sum of Rs. 1,98,000 to be just and reasonable and ' In the result, 2/ 2006, applicé‘don for condonah‘on he. sam€ has bean filed with a dalay 3d 24.8.2€)O6. this appeal amd did not pOS$ess proceedings after passing of the ground for condoning the delay the impugned award it is — as compensation, which appears accordance with law. M.C.P. o. 1608/2006, application for condonation of delay in tiling this stands dismissed as barred by Consequently, the appeal als. limitation Dhirendra Mishra Judge mm