IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13090 of 2010 MILAN KUMAR SON OF KARNBIR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.4.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 307, 380, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner and co-accused Pradip Yadav are said to have fired at the informant causing injury on his knee and the knee of his niece. The submission is that it has been mentioned in the first information report itself that there was land dispute between the parties, on account of which the occurrence took place and the petitioner did not repeat the fire. It is also submitted that the petitioner is an accused in only one other case, which fact will be verified by the Magistrate concerned before releasing the petitioner on bail. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 1.2.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in Mansi P.S.case No.2 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information - 2 - to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )