IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 5801 of 2008 Decided on: 30.08.2010 Lekh Ram …Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed before the Court a copy of judgment dated 09.09.2008, rendered by Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 35 of 2002. In the present case also, the petitioner, though Ex-serviceman, was appointed against the un-reserved post. However, his option was not obtained. 2. Consequently, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner as per the principles laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove, within a period of 10 weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- 3. In light of above, the petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge August 30, 2010 (K. Attri)