/ A , C311 C, MWV IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO.§‘k§.l. 2004 WRITTPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CEERTIORARI MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERES: PETITIONER Tirath Ram Patel S/o Late Shri HariRam, Patel aged about 42 years, Resident of Village 85 Post~Chhatamura, Tahsil & Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS. The Vice Chancellor of Guru A $ “A? ...... Ghasidas University, Koni, " Bi1aspur(c.o.) ¢ The Ragistrar of Guru " Ghasidas University Koni, Bilaspur (C.G.) i XI-HC 78 WW (Wu) mmmm Wmw1§wm $WW 17/01I2005: — Shri RS. Patel Iearned counsel for the petitioner. Heard on LA. No.7253 of 2004 which is an appiication for urgent . hearing The matter is taken up on Board. ‘Hence, LA. No.7253 of 2004 stands disposed of. Heard on the question of admission of this writ petition. Learned counsel appearing for th petitioner submits that in pursuance ,of the advertisement (Annexure-P/i) d ted 17/1211 992 the petitioner was called to appear in the interview on 2010 11 993 for the post of Lower Division Cierk/Hindi Typist in the Establishment f respondents 1 and 2, He further submits that the petitioner appeared int e aforesaid test. Further submission of the learned counsel appearing for the etitioner is that even after appearing in the said test, result of the test has hot been declared so far. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner had submitted various representations, but the University authorities are‘not giviné any reply to the same. Learned counsel makes a limited prayer that a dirpction may be given to the University authorities to declare the result of the petitioner. i In the opinion of this Court, the ayer seems to be genuine and the i same is allowed. it is, therefore, directe that the University authorities shall declare the result of the petitioner regard ng the interview held on 20/07/1 993 in pursuance of the advertisement dated 7/1 2/1 992. Ifthe result has already been deblared the same shall be communica to the petitioner. With the above observations, the etition stands disposed/of finally. Sd/— i “Synil Kumar Sinha ‘ Judge r ‘ t