[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.1487 OF 2008 Pankaj Tarachand Bhavar ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.K.S.Patil Advocate for Applicant Mr.S.S.Pednekar APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 8, 2008 DATE : JULY 8, 2008 DATE : JULY 8, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in CR No.53 of 2008 of Chhavani Police Station, Malegaon. The said case is under Sections 418 and 420 r.w. 34 of IPC and under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 3. The complainant states that the matter has been amicably settled between the accused persons and the complainant, hence, he has no objection to the anticipatory bail being granted to the applicant. [-2-] The complainant has also tendered affidavit to the above effect which is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. In view of the above facts, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. 4. In the event of arrest, the applicant-Pankaj Tarachand Bhavar be released on bail in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rs.twenty thousand only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant to report to Chhavani Police Station Malegaon as and when required. 5. Application disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]