IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No. 10241-M of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : FEBRUARY 3, 2010 PARTAP & ORS. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Pankaj Nanhera, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the petition for quashing the FIR to enable the petitioners to take all the defences available to them during the course of trial, in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. February 3, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?