1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. MCA (Review) No. 1479 of 2009 In LPA No. 386 of 2008 Shri Ramchandra and anr v. The PO, ST and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Shri R.M. Bhangde, Adv for applicants Shri P.S. Patil, Adv for R-2 Coram : S.A. Bobde and F.M. Reis, JJ Dated : 7.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. There is no dispute that there is no pleading before the School Tribunal as to whether the respondent-teacher was gainfully employed or not. In the circumstances, we consider it appropriate, in the interest of justice, to hold that the direction given by the School Tribunal to pay full back-wages to respondent no. 2 in its judgment dated 5.7.2008 is liable to be set aside. In the result, impugned judgment of the School Tribunal dated 5.7.2008 is set aside as far as it awards payment of back-wages to respondent no.2-teacher. M.C.A. stands disposed of accordingly. Judge. Judge. 2 Hsj