IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1966 of 2005 SATYENDRA PRASAD SINGH @ SATYENDRA SINGH Versus SECRETARY,ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT & ORS. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ram Suresh Roy, Sr.Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate --------------- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ---------- Dated, the 8th July, 2008. The senior counsel for the petitioner submits and, in our view, fairly that pursuant to the order dated 30th November, 2004, an order has been passed by the authority rejecting the claim of the petitioner. If that be so, the remedy available in law must be availed of by the petitioner for redressal of the grievance with regard to non- payment of outstanding dues but that cannot be a subject matter of contempt jurisdiction, particularly keeping in view the limited direction that has been given in the order dated 30th November, 2004. 2. With the aforesaid observations, M.J.C. is disposed of. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J Anil/