IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1090 of 2011 MUKESH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 09.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 58 of 2004 registered under Section 188 of the I.P.C. and Section 47A of the Excise Act. The accusation is of selling of country made liquor. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the shop in question was not of the petitioner. Moreover, the Supervising Officer found the case false. Since the case was instituted in the year 2004 on that ground alone, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, the aforesaid submission may be a good ground for consideration of regular bail. If the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within four weeks then the learned court below may consider the same preferably on the same day. With this observation, this application is disposed off. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)