IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2007 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1929 RP.No. 1013 of 2007(F) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.27561/2005 .................... PETITIONER: ---------------------------- S. USHA, W/O. S. SASIKUMAR, USHUS, T.C.NO.22/905, DEVI NAGAR, PEROORKADA, TRIVANDRUM-5. BY ADV. SRI.MOHAN JACOB GEORGE SMT.P.V.PARVATHI SMT.REENA THOMAS RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. BANK OF MAHARASHTRA, TRIVANDRUM BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. 2. S. SASIKUMAR, "USHUS", T.C.22/905, DEVI NAGAR, PEROORKADA, TRIVANDRUM-5. 3. S. SUKESAN, KAROOKONAM PUTHEN VEEDU, T.C.10/621, TRIVANDRUM-5. 4. CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER. 5. SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI DIVISION. 6. THE CHIEF SUPERVISOR, CENTRAL RAILWAY, C.S.T., MUMBAI. 7. THE PARCEL SUPERVISOR, CENTRAL RAILWAY, WADIBUNDU, MUMBAI. 8. THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. R1 BY SC SRI. R.S. KALKURA R4 TO R7 BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS, SC,RAILWAYS THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- R.P. NO. 1013 OF 2007 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of December, 2007 ORDER I do not find any ground to interfere with the judgment in review. However, the borrower or guarantor is free to approach the Bank for settlement, and if there is any settlement, there is no need for the Bank to pursue the O.A. before the DRT. Review Petition is dismissed. (C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge 2