THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH C.R.P.No.1004 of 2010 Dt.18.6.2010 Yadalam Ramalingam … Petitioner Vs. 1. Yadalam Sudharshan and another … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH C.R.P.No.1004 of 2010 O R D E R: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 23.11.2009 passed in I.A.No.289 of 2008 in I.A.No.378 of 2005 in O.S.No.178 of 2001 by the Junior Civil Judge, Thamballapalle, Chittoor District. The petitioner herein is the second defendant in the suit filed by the first respondent herein for grant of permanent injunction against the petitioner and the 2nd respondent herein. In the suit, both the defendants entered appearance by engaging an advocate. As the written statements were not filed, they were set ex parte and ex parte decree was passed on 20.12.2004. After passing the ex parte decree, IA No.378 of 2005 was filed to condone the delay of 150 days in filing the petition to set aside the ex parte decree and the said application was dismissed for default on 18.4.2006. Thereafter, I.A.No.289 of 2008 was filed to condone the delay of 558 days in filing an application for restoring I.A.No.378 of 2005. I have gone through the affidavit filed by the petitioner. The petitioner has not given any reasons or sufficient cause explaining the delay of 558 days to condone the delay in filing the application to restore the earlier I.A., which was dismissed for default. As the petitioner has not explained sufficient cause or reasons for condoning the delay, I am of the opinion that the court below has rightly dismissed the said I.A. Therefore, I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the impugned order passed by the court below. Accordingly, the C.R.P. is dismissed. No costs. _______________ V.ESWARAIAH,J 18th June, 2010 PNV