1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC No. 127 of 2011. Decided on: 1. 7. 2011. Mohan Lal ....Petitioner. Versus Sudipti Roy ....Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. ________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Abheyendra Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the intervening developments, it cannot be said that there is contumacious conduct on the part of the respondent. Though, the order has been passed, but the consequential benefits have not been granted to the petitioner. The consequential benefits, pursuant to the judgment dated 11th May, 2010, rendered by this Court in CWP No. 1990 of 2009, 2 titled as Mohan Lal & others versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others, if not already disbursed, shall be disbursed to the petitioner, within a period of two months. Subject to the above, the COPC is dismissed, discharging the notice. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. July 1, 2011 (Justice V.K. Sharma) (LSP/hl) Judge.