•; -:'XSSKSii(:;: ::^.<- ;^'3~; <'<•...**•» .y^s^'/^ ^y ys^ @®f IN^U1E_HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT PETITIOJM N0.'/~ " /2006 PETITIONER <OMPLAINANT / Smt. Pratima Patanwar W/o. Shri B.S. Patanwar Aged about 41 years R/o. Kapil Nagar, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) R^SPONDENT CONTEMNER VERSUS Shri R.R.Tiwari Chief Medical Officer Health Department, Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Dr. B.S. Serva, Joint Director Health & Family Welfare Department Raipur (C.G.) > CONTEMPT PETITION UNDERSECTION 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ENDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF^OURT ACT XI-HC-78 7S{ •<<iqid<q, yrflu'16, (cldltfy IPA^-1^/20^ *ll*lWl sh*l|ch ^; 3TT^?Tk<acn ('i^i^'^T) 3I1^T^TR-fi»h tRT 3:n^?T sbH CTgTWHfsa'sn^T Sfan Gaiit.am Khetrapal, Sfan. Prashant Mislira, Sil Tiwan, Advocate for the respondl neara, Leanied coiuisel for the p( filed a writ petition bearuie Vi/| caiiceilation of traiisfer order i| 2004. it is submitted tliat from senous diseases namelv 1} the condition of Uie petitionerl order on 5-5-2004 directtng thal the next date of hearmg, If ii Dassed an order on 13-9-201 consider tae medical bffls ofthel as. OKier ot' 14-2-2006 directmd submits tuat tae above orciers hj The icspoudent No. 1 lias Shri Prashant Mislira. Sr,| no. 1 Stibmlts th.at orders y submitted that the nieu.icines provided by majsuig local purclil inecucmes wnicn were requn'ea couceniecl, to and iro exuenses dociim.euts' Aruiexiire R-l iiave pe1|itioner 'hi<it<i41-i iiticii'fftet^ <!«i+i;i< ^i3frf^IT3f7^T Ativocate tijr tfae petitiouer. Advocate with. Shri Vivek Raaiaa ^nt No.1. fctitioner suumits that tfae petitioner I.P. No. 327/2005 chaUengmg the tassed bv the resuondent on 5-1- ie1|itioners two cniidren are suiienae lemoDhilia I''actor-9 and looking to Fs ciuldren, tfals C.ourt passed an tf anv amount 1s due, it be paid tul subniitted that asain thls coiu-t p4 directiug tue respondents to peutioner. This couit asam. passeci Davment ot ined.ical bills. Coiinsei iiAve not been comDlied. liued replv. tifive Advocate aopearmg tbr respondent ive been coiaplied with. He also woixh Rs. 1.20.000./- liave been ase irom Ked Cross shou, So tar as to be brought from Mum.bai are are being oaict to tlie uetitioner and been tMed, So t'ar as salaiy of ttie P.T.O. XI-HC-78 ^I^IMI S»rHT^i 3^ •<11<||0<|, dtfl^ld, Rltr|lti^< __ro^-^No. i^/-?0^ ^ 3n^?Ttraq? (t^qi^^r) sn^T^rf^riq; Fr'3TI^Tsh1 un' STcfTWHfN'w^r -2- wqfefrr im^ft'^'fe^-i^TRR ^Srf^ITSTT^T penuoner tor the peiiod 1-5-2(P04 to 17-4-2006 is concem.ed, he sufamitted tliat an ainount ot' Ks. 2,11,064 has been paid. to tfae petitioner. He subiuitted ttiat b< ciiitdren of ttie uetitioner, Counsel tor ttie petitioa^ tst treatment wul be provided to Uie ;r submits that the petitioner has been traiislerrcd to BiUia and to view oi the tam.ily cu'crim.stauces, her case for trauster to Bilasuui Shri Mishra, Sr. Coiinse] concerued, fhe petitioner may ^ be consulered bv the autbol relevant lacts luider consideratjon. -lavmg considermg the mavr 'oe consiaerea. . submits tliat so tar as transter is zibmit a representauon, which shaU. ^^-s ^tT-^^^f^t ^ t'S.- nties svmoaUiencaUv Jseepuig uie bcts aad circumstances of th.e case mid matenal on record, m fhe fc'oiaioii of this Court, ends of iustice will be served ]f a direction is f treatment to tfae oentioner's petiUoner to Bua.spur is con<] reoresentatioii to the comil aveii to the respondents to eive best ;mldren. So tar as traasier of tfae :en-ied., tfae petitioner mav make a •etent aufhontv, wiuch shall be considered and decided ia accclrdance witfa law. Wifh the atbresaid directlons, ffae petitiou is disposed ot. Certitied. copy as ner rule|s - ..—.^ r Fakhruddin Judge P.T.O. v