IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1479 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.10.2010 Sukhdev Kumar .....Petitioner Versus Shri Arun Goel and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri M.K. Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Sahu, AAG, Punjab. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) Shri S.S. Sahu, learned AAG, Punjab, states that the retiral benefits payable to the petitioner have been sanctioned and that necessary payment shall be made within a period of one month from today. In view of the said fact, I do not find any reason to continue with the present proceedings. Hence, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation, if dissatisfied with the amount paid. As and when such representation is filed, the same shall be decided by the competent authority, in accordance with law. [ HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 12.10.2010 Preeti/ds