1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.366 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.366 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.366 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.2876 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.2876 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.2876 OF 2005 WITH WITH WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2876 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.2876 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.2876 OF 2005 Maharashtra State Electricity Boards Contributor Provident Fund .. Petitioner vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board and 5 Ors. .. Respondents Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni i/b Mr.L.M.Acharya for the petitioner Mr.Sanjay Udeshi for respondent no.2 Mr.S.Khedekar for respondent no.3 CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & K.K. TATED, JJ. K.K. TATED, JJ. K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE: 27TH JANUARY, 2009 DATE: 27TH JANUARY, 2009 DATE: 27TH JANUARY, 2009 P.C. 1. Having gone through the orders dated 18.11.2008 and hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that the petitioner can be permitted to withdraw the amount deposited in this court by respondent nos.2 and 3 in pursuance of the aforesaid 2 order. 2. It is made clear that the respondents are parties to the litigation before the Supreme Court. Needless to state that the parties may take appropriate steps in the matter, as it does not in any way create a legal impediment to the petitioners in claiming the said amount from the respondents. Liberty to move the court as and when contingency arises. 3. Stand over to 6 weeks. 4. Notice of Motion No.366 of 2008 is made absolute in aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. (J.N. PATEL, J.) (J.N. PATEL, J.) (J.N. PATEL, J.) (K.K. TATED, J.) (K.K. TATED, J.) (K.K. TATED, J.)