^.., ^- .\^:'^': IN THE MON'BLE HI&H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) N0. ^^Or> PETtTCONER RESPONbENTS A^^-<- ^.^^T,....- .0«''' ^^.^^ ^' '^^' ^ ^itN^ '"<^ ^^ ^T^ /2011 : Smt. Leela Kannaujiya (Now Anant) W/o Shn' Ram Lal, aged abQut 45 years, Upper Division Teacher, Middle School, Pali, District- Korba(C.G.). VERSUS : 1. State 6f Ghhattisgarh, Through - TheSecretary, Tribal Welfare bepartment. b.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. -Raipur (^.).',:.,.'\11',^:;,:..'•.;•;•• 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Korba Distt-Korba(C.^) 3. Block Educdtion Officer, Pali, Distt.-Korba(C.G.) WRIT PETCTION UNbER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOFINbIA 'i\' ^'^ ^p HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON'BLB MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKBR W.P.(S).NO. 6907/2011 PETITIONER RESPONDBNTs versus Smt. Leela Kao.naujiya (Now Anant) State of Chhattisgarh &, Ofhers Shri Anil Singh Rajput, counsel for the petitioner, Shri N.Naha Roy, P.L. for the State. WRIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLB 226 QF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER 123.11.2011) Grievaace of fhe petitioner in fhe present petition is tiiat fhe petitioner was appoiated ia fhe year 1987 as Assistaat Teacher on a fixed pay scale of Rs. 300 aad after conipletiou of probation, she was graated regular pay scale ofRs. 545-925. Contention of tlie counsel for fhe petitioner is fhat she is eatiUed for regular pay scale wifh. effect from. the date of Hiitial appoiatment and her case is squarely covered wifh nuniber of decisions passed by this Court. aiid also the judgnient rendered by the M,P. State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur m O^A. N0. 2745/89 (Mcstdhukeint Tajdu <& 56 Others Vs. State ef M.P. <& Cfthers) where ia it has been held fhat similarly placed teachers are entitled for regular pay scale froia the date of their tn.itial appoiiifcnient. It is not disputed by both fhe parties that tlie inatter was takeu up by the State to the Apex Court but the appeal was also disniissed by tiie Apex Court upholding fhe decision of tlie Tribunal to the effect that flie Teachers/Assistaiit Teachers are entifled for regular pay scale froni tiie date of their iaitial appoiatment. lu view of the above subinission made by the counsel for fhe parties, fhe petition is disposed of ia the same terois i.e, the 'T a§pnf ja^BMiQ ja^ui^uj -/PS •MCI ipiM soirepjoooe in A^ou^s uoi^B^uosMdM sip ^pio^p o^ ^isqiT ys oq pinoM pQiusouoo ^uoq^n^ ^q^ pxre os^o sq^ jo S^TJOICT Qip. uo noiuido Axre possQjdxo ^ou saq IJHOO siq^ ^rp. jeop spBux si ^ •S^OBJ ^rRjo AUT^raos snp J^je jopjo ^iq^xns ss^d o^ sQFtuo^n^ oy^g 31^ uxo.g: pQ^osdxs ST ^i •A[§UIpJOOOB J9I{3J QUIBS O^ pQpl^UQ ^q ABTO; j^uoT^izod oxp, hS6*TO>SO PQ^eP *x^P^o ^q G6/5689 "ON (RATQ) uo^^3<i aABsq Tepadg m ^noo smsjdns sx^ Aq pouuguoo A^usnbQsqns pue (ejdus) npBj^ i.ue5[nqp^]/\[ ui ^nuqp:J, ^Ai^^x^siuimpv 9^iS 9Il^ ^q P^ssad jopjo jod SB Supooj Qia^s oro. uo SpIia^S JQHOT^l^^d OIp. JI *3AT103dsj9d S^I Ul pITe SlUQTa UMO 8^1 UO 3SBO J9I| JQplSUOO OZ pQ^DSJlp Sl ^U3pUodS3J pOUJ^OUOO 31^ 'TUU^ Ul pire 80tSI*ZS P°^eP ^^in^o ^qi pxre ^u^uigpnf pres^jojB ^qi jo ^qSn ^ip CT 'pQSTApB OS Jl <UOI^^U3S9jd9J: B 95[BIU O^. AlJOqil p^URlS ST JQUOp.T^od