THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 4.12.2018 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P. Nos. 16135 & 16136 of 2004 R. Sivakumar, IAS., ...Petitioner in both W.P.'s Vs. 1. The Government of India, Rep. By its Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, P.G. & Pensions, New Delhi. 2. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary to Government, Public (Spl.B) Department, Fort St. George, Madras – 600 009. 3. The Central Administrative Tribunal, Rep. By its Registrar, Madras Bench, Madras. ...Respondents Prayer in W.P.No.16135 of 2004: Writ Petition filed under Article of 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records and order passed in O.A. No. 137 of 2000 dated 27.07.2001 by the 3rd respondent and quash the same and thereby declaring that the Rule 16(A) of the All India Services (Death-cum-Retirement Benefits) Rule, 1958 is ultra vires the Constitution and inconsistent with the provisions of the of the parent act of All India Services Act, 1951. Prayer in W.P.No.16136 of 2004: Writ Petition filed under Article of 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records and orders passed in Review Application No. 36 of 2001, dated 23.11.2001 and O.A. No. 138 of 200 dated 27.7.01 by the 3rd respondent and in F.No. 25015/8/98-AIS-II, dated 31.12.1998 by the 1st respondent and quash the same and further direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to correct the date of birth of the petitioner as 03.10.1954 in the Service Record of the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Petitioner :No Appearance For Respondents :Mr. G. Karthikeyan for R1 M/s. A. Sri Jayanthi, Spl. GP for R2 Re – Tribunal COMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.) When this matter was taken up on 03.12.2018, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was ordered to be posted for dismissal today (4.12.2018). 2. Today, even though the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal', neither the petitioner nor his counsel is present to prosecute the matter. Hence, these writ petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ssm Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, P.G. & Pensions, New Delhi. 2. The Secretary Government of Tamil Nadu Public (Spl.B) Department, Fort St. George, Madras – 600 009. 3. The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Madras. W.P. No. 16135 & 16136 of 2004 kak(02/01/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/