,-3 fS'SStf&^SSi-'SSt i:iS<a.£wjIS^Ii ^!^S IRfi ,^' -^ tO.SV" ::.^ '. :: ' ; r^ •^-' ^iii1^,-,!'^ ^ISg :>>li.KEll ^•%IM(iS%^l^;':^:'^'^ l!N;ai@^a©JN®a^»I©H:.6^ M^^C^SA^ ^'i'fiiijasitJR i P.. (m.:iNO.S^^%^:JOE'.200& '^siUai.^^fShaiiSF^s^^SQiK^Bf'. 'I.iaie^Sliiai^guKH^^I-at GlajarttIrSK.ar,; :l^ed|^©i^^^;^a^.i?vscgRl.a®g ;^LS : -^^^A^stant.,'iDistiaet'':^.:S|aoi-ts:. QfGf^r,iS)tsti-ic!t^%'t:l.c:aj;ioffit(g|B.(ig» •Mal»asainiund^I^siden1|^of|;Village ^ aroEa,:Qistt.T\fIaHasam^d(©,© .Stat&<3^©Ii]:ia.6ti.sligar&,^ :,'I'MrQl|lgll|T^?(y§®(M^Et:!^,|f:||S^ E(3|tii^iQn^^:?I3^a2"ffiient^:^I3.K^ :'BtS8Swai^;SasffE^^.©f.'j^^ ^De^a.tyJ:-: F :,.Secrefary, .r|;ij.|,,S:eh@J3l, Eduisaticin B.ieS.Blaaw&n;iRaipur (C.©.^ DiiJstnct: ^'B',: Ed'utiatidn •; •lV[atiasainund,i' !. .:. ;' ,' ^i ©lW|ifeit' •K'[ah:asMi]iiund-(C;.G.); ; ; ,'i Eleetion •Ccimlrnissiote ^oP^ liridia, E^roligh:-.,SeGi;gtary,^ ^ Sadian'^shoka.Seaa, Ne'w!D@lhl!i :OffieNri •-Electoral; ^. ;^lt GIIthaftisgaitt, Indravati | MarHa-al^a,^Raipu.i'-(C.Gt:.); WRIT PETITIQN U/^ 2% ;©®CT3®; .©@N§TBItIiJ'I® FOR .ISSUAN(SE> 'OF .il'W3 MANDAMUS;G!ERTlQRaKIi, lEiRlESBnaBiWjEfG^ •N^TlHiiB .^'s^ ^||||^:|l^;j||^ .1. -tiH •«1 m ,^" t^3 \H r»n,iis3T -wnnn1i (Hon. Mr. Justice PritiaKer Diwaker) Vtfrlt Peti VERSUS K^^ Manohar Lal Chandrskar. State of Chhattisgarh and other-s. Shri V.K. Pandey counsel forthe petltioner. Ku, Sunlta Jaln PL for the respondents/State. tfRET PETITION UNI 1 Ul 1 l.A/i With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finaiiy. Chalienge in the instant petition Is to the order dated 01.10.2008 (Annexure P-1) passad by respondent No.1 whereby the petitioner was transferred from Ranjit Governmeni Higher Secondary Schooi, Pithora, District Mahasamund to Assistant District Sports Officer, Mahasamund, in vlolation of the transfer poiicy. This petition was filed on 17.10.2008 and the stay was granted in favour of the petifioner vide order dated 21.10.2008. Contention of the counsel for the parties is that this Court may quash the impugned transfer order by giying liberty to the respondents to pass fresh order if administrative exigency so warrants. in view of the submissions of the counsei for the respective parties and looking to the fact that the petltion was flled on 17.10.2008 and stay was granted in fsvour of the petltioner vide order dated 21.10.2008, the impugDed order dated 01.10.2008 so far as it relates to the petitioner is hereby quashed. Hcwe'/er, the respondents shail be free to pass the order afresh if administrafive exigency necessitates the same. the aforesald obsen/ation, the petition stands disposed of,, With VM s<u- w ^^ ^aUet -—•u