‘aE E 1W“ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATrISGARH) WRIT PETITION’NO¢%% OF 2006 PETITIONERS Arun Kumar Gupta, aged about 44 years, Son of Shri Madanlal Gupta, Occupation—Service, Presently working as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Gadhideeh, Block Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.). Ashok Kumar Sharma, aged about 44 years, Son of Shri Natthuial Sharma, Occupation— Service, Presently working as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Nawagaon Jhottha, Block Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.). Jaijairam Rathore, aged about 43 years, Son of Shri Awadh Ram‘ Rathore, Occupation—Service, & Presently working as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Chandrapur, Block Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.). Vishnu Prasad Chandrawanshi, aged about 4O years, Son of Shri Brijlal Chandrawanshi, Occupation— Service, Presently working as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Rahangi, Block Lormi, District BiiaSpur (C.G.). '33: * $ @ ’5. Smt. Tarini Vaishnav, aged about 42 years, Wife of Shri Chandrakishore Das Vaishnav, Occupation-Service, Presently working as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Girls Primary School Lormi, Block Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS RE§PONDENTS /1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan Ralpur (C.G.). The District Education Officer, Bilaspur (C.G.). The Block Education Officer, Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.). . r / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 QF THE CONSTITUTIOIM QF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 1444 of 2006 Peh'tioners : Arun 'Kumar Gupta 6n others Versus . Respondents : State of Chhatfisgarh O$cer 65 others Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Smt. Hamida Siddique, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Government Advocate for the respondents] State. I ORAL ORDER (28th March, 2006) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been denied two incmments from the date of the petitioners having passed B.Ed. Examination as per the Cixcular dated 24. 12. 1998f Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners wants to seek liberty of this Court to make a lepresentations to the authorities for the relief sought for in this petition, to which learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. Accordingly, the petitioners are granted liberty to make detailed epresentations within a period of two Weeks to the concerned authorities. In that event, the concerned authorities are directed to consider the said representations and decide, in accordance with law, Within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representations. ln View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. No order'as to costs. Sd/- x ' Satish K. Agnihotri i} Judge 1‘ r r ‘m