:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 575 OF 2008 M/s.Master Marine Services P.Ltd ...Petitioner Versus Narayan P.Kahar ....Respondents ====== Mr.Anilkumar, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.Sushil Mahadeshwar, Adv. for the respondents. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 15TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. The petitioner has challenged in this Writ Petition the Award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.2 dated 7.9.2007. Under the said Award, the petitioner has been directed to reinstate the Workmen, (Respondent no.1) within 2 months from the date of the Award and the claim of the Workmen with regard to backwages is rejected. The reference is allowed in these terms. :2: :2: :2: 2. During the course of arguments, Mr.Anilkumar after taking instructions from the representative of the petitioner who is present in court, made a suggestion that if at all the Workmen has to be reinstated in service, the petitioner is not desirous of placing him at Mumbai but would give him appropriate placement at the port of Mundra, where the petitioner has an Establishment. 3. The petitioner no.1 Workmen, Narayan Kahar is present in court and Mr.Mahadeshwar after taking instructions from him, makes a statement that he is willing to join the Establishment even, if he is posted at Mundra. 4. Considering the fact that the petitioners’ suggestion has been accepted by the Respondent no.1 Workmen, Mr.Anilkumar states that he has instructions not to prosecute the petition. The Writ Petition is therefore disposed off as not pressed and in the light of the arrangement which has been arrived at before this court. sd/- :3: :3: :3: ********