.&£' f^.., ^' HIQH COURT QP CHHATTISGAJRH AT BILASpUR W.P.IS1 N0. 7731/2007 Murit Raui Nishad, S/o. Late Shri Bhaiyalal, aged about 50 years, Upper Division Teacher, Goventment Middle School Rajkamina, Block-Pali, Disfa-ict Korba $CG) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Education. Department, D.K.S.Bhawaa, Raipur (CG) The Dn-ector, Public Instruction Departiaent, Raipur (CG) District Education Of&cer, Korba (CG) Block Education Ofiicer, Pali, District Korba (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION 2. 3. :_HpnUe Mr^SatisIt K. Agniliotri, J.l Shri Anup Majuindar, Advocate appears OTI behalf of Shri K.S.Pawar, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Biau Sharaaa, Panel Lawyer for fhe State. ^^ (Passed on this 3rd day of January 2008) Learaed coitasel appearmg for fhe petitioner subxnits fhat fhe petitioner was appointed on a SxeQ. pay scale of Rs. 150/ -. After completioDL of his probation, ftie petitioner was graated regular pay scale. This Court has cousidered tfae identical issues ia fhe matter of Paras Nath Gupta Vs..State of Chhattisgarh & Ofhers in W.P.(S) No. 58/2007 whereunder it was decided on 15.01.2007 holding fhat Parasnath Gupta, who was smulalrly situated, be graated regular pay scale with eflect fix>nu fhe date of iuitial appoiaUnent. Leamed couiisel further subiaits that the present case is squarely covered by the decision of this Coiurt ia the case of Paras Nafh Gupta Vs. State of Chliattisgarh and Ofhers (Supra). ra b^SUWWWSSiS&SssaSiitS^SSSSSS^^SSp'^^. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents/State has no objection. 3. In view of tbe foregoiag, fhis petition is allowed ia the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 5uguna ro