1 wp11709.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11709 OF 2010 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. V.J. Dhage, Advocate for the petitioners. 1. Both Courts have concurrently found that the respondents are in possession and inducted on the basis of agreement with the trust. The defence of the present petitioners that the persons so inducting had no authority has also considered. I do not find any jurisdictional error or perversity, hence the Petition is rejected. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE. 13.01.2011 gas/wp11709.10