IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED WRIT PETITION NO : 3901 of 2005 Between: 1 M/s. Srisaila Mallikarjuna Dall Producers, Rep. by its Managing Partner, G. Madhusudhan Rao, S/o. Chenchaiah, Age about 37 Years, Business, R/o. Podili, Prakasam District. 2 G. Madhusudhan Rao, Managing Partner, M/s. Srisaila Mallikarjuna Dall Producers, S/o. Chenchaiah, R/o. Podili, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Sub Regional Officer, 3rd Lante, Krishnanagar,Guntur District. 2 The Recovery Officer/Assistant Commissioner, Sub Regional Office, Guntur. 3 The Enforcement Officer, Employment Provident fund Organization, Ongole, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents herein demanding and claiming the arrears of provident fund from the petitioners between the periods of September 1992 and June 2004, as illegal, arbitrary, erroneous, highhanded violative of the provisions of E.P.F. and M.P. Act 1952 and also declare the notice of arrest dated 17-1-2005 issued by the second respondent as illegal, arbitrary erroneous and consequently direct the respondents to withdraw their claim and demand of arrears of the provident fund from the petitioners between the periods of September1992 and June 2004 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.Y.V.RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents : MR.R.N.REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: ( per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed ) Mr. K. Vasanth Rao, learned counsel representing Mr. Y. V. Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. In the view of the submission made by the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. _____________________ Ghulam Mohammed, J Dated : 29th April, 2005 Nrg To 1. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Sub Regional Officer, 3rd Lante, Krishnanagar,Guntur District. 2 The Recovery Officer/Assistant Commissioner, Sub Regional Office, Guntur. 3 The Enforcement Officer, Employment Provident fund Organization, Ongole, Prakasam District. 4. 2 ccs Learned SC for respondents, APHC Buildings, Hyd. (O.U.T.) 5. 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SPJS}