IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 1502 of 2011 Sanjeev Kumar and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents. Present : Mr. Sandeep Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) 1. Heard Mr. Sandeep Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. The petitioners are the “Shiksha Mitra” with graduation in Primary Education Guarantee Centres. As per the government scheme, the petitioners were liable to be made “Shiksha Mitra”. The names of the petitioners were also sent for the said purpose i.e. for the purpose of inclusion of their names in the list of “Shiksha Mitra” by the Block Education Officer. However, in the list finalized by the District Education Officer, names of the petitioners have been deleted. According to the petitioners, no reason has been assigned by the District Education Officer, as to why the names of the petitioners have been deleted. They further state that the representation in this regard is also pending with the District Education Officer, Udham Singh Nagar. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State Mr. Anil Bisht has very fairly stated that the matter be disposed of at the admission stage itself with appropriate direction to the District Education Officer, Udham Singh Nagar. 4. On the basis of the submissions made above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Education Officer, Udham Singh Nagar or Additional District 2 Education Officer, as the case may be, to decide the representation of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible but definitely within a period of three weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. 5. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) Dated:09.11.2011 Kuldeep