1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.135 OF 2006 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.3092 OF 2005 Naresh Tribhuvan Wadhel. ...Plaintiff. vs. 1. Shanil Builders & others. ...Defendants. --- Mr. M.G.Mimani i/b. Ms.B.K.Karle, for Plaintiff. None for Defendants. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 25th July, 2006. P.C.:- 1. This is a summons for judgment taken out by the plaintiff against the defendants. The defendants are served with the summons for judgment. Affidavit of service has been filed. The defendants have not filed any application for leave to defend. Hence, as required by the provisions of Order 37 of the Civil Procedure Code, the plaintiff becomes entitle to a judgment. 2 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for Plaintiff. Perused the record. The summons for judgment is granted. The suit is decreed in terms of prayer clause (a), (b) & (c). Refund of Court fees as per rules. ---