s?^ nr TSE Hic®COORT OP CHHAVHS^ARB AT BILASPUR wmr pEmTias KO.^S-^^ PETI'nOHER ^ Santosh Kumar Kashyap, Aged fc ^^^ . about 27 years, S/o. Sfari Mohan .^^y ^ ^s^''.^ ^y ^" .».••" Lal Kashyap, R/o. Vinoba N^ar, Boirdadar, Raigarh, Tahsfl & Raigarh (C.G.) ^" RESN»SD@dS <A13^ ^'•—s^'rf ''.. t^ ,'''-'.. ^^-S^.^sff^^ ^ -^ ^.-•g^ ^ VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Throi^h the Secretaiy, Hi^ier & Technical Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) G^ ^, 2. "nie Secretary, Man Power & ^' - Planning, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Director, Einployinent & Tranining Mahila Pofytechnic Cainpus, Bairan Bazar Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Joint Director (Traming) ^ Industrial Training tastitute, i, Bilaspur, Tahsil & Disfcrict Bflaspur. (C.G.) WMT HBTOTOOB ORDat ABMCI^ 226/227 OF faE CORSTITOTION or INDI& a HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISOARH: BIUUSPUR Sin^e Bench: Hon'ble Shrl Satdsh K. Agnlhotri, J. W. P. Wo. 3326 of 2006 Petitioncr Respondents Versus Santosh Kumar Kashyap State ofChhattisgarh & Ofhers Shri Roop Naik, counsel for the petitioner. Shri G.K. Beriwal, Deputy Advocate General with Shri Satish Gupta, Depuly Govemment Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDBR (5*'1 May, 2006) 1. In this petition the petitioner seeks for foUowiag relief: 7.1 The respoudents be directed to comptetely follow thc prescnbed Rules of appoiataient i.e Chliattisgarh Industrial Trnming (Non-gazette) Service Recmitment Rules 2005". 7.2 The respondents be directed to cousider the petitiouer's experience having beeu worked for 3 academic sessions for his recruitment". 7,3 "Auy ofher relief, which fhe Honl3le Coiut deem fit and proper looktag to fhe facts and circuinstances, may also be passed". 2. Shri G.K. Beriwal, Deputy Advocate General appearing for the respondents states that the respondents are under au obligation to coiaply with all fhe piuvisions of Chhattisgarh Industnal (Non-gazette) . Services Recruitment Rules 2005 while considering case of the_ petitioner for appointment on the post of Visiting Professor. In the event, the petitmner has experience of workuig three acadenuc sessions aad it is prowided iiuder pnovisions of law, the saine wiU also be considered at the time of recruitm.ent/selectioa of the similarly situated candidates for appointnient on the post of Visitiug Professor. In view of fhe above stetement inade by the leamed couusel for the respoiidents, fhis petition cannot be entertained, on the basis of anticipated apprehension in the inind offhe petitioner. The petition is accurdingfy disnusse(Lsi@inarily. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge ^•5V