IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 13564 of 2005 Between: Bhogi Anjeneyaswamy S/o. Late Satyanarayana R/o. Lakshminagar Amadalavalasa Srikakulam district. ..... PETITIONER AND The Asst. Commissioner Endowments Department Srikakulam Srikakulam disrict. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: None appeared Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : O R D E R : At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition itself is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent in not passing order on the petition filed by the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, it is represented by Sri Ch.A.B.Satyanarayana, learned counsel representing Sri M.Surender Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, that Sri M.Surender Rao had given up his vakalat. Ordinarily, the writ petition ought to have been dismissed for non- prosecution but, at the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments submitted, and placed before me a copy of order passed by the respondent on 21-09-2005, that after the filing of the writ petition, the respondent disposed of the petition filed by the petitioner. I have perused the said order and I am satisfied that with the disposal of the petition filed by the petitioner, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP No.17209 of 2005 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date: 1st July, 2008 vrn