HIGH CO'URT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Wiit.^titien (S) No. 4092 of2008 PETITIONER : Jagdamba Prasad Chatm'vedi, aged about 56 years son of Shri Ramnath, Resident of Primaiy School, North Jhagrakhahd, District Korea (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Department of Schooi Education, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The District Education OtTicer, Korea, District Korea 3. Admmistrator/Principal I.E.NI. SchooL Jhagrakhand, DistrictKorea (CG). 4. The Director, Directorate, Public Institution, Pension Bada, Raipur (CG). (WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'bie Mr. Satish K. Asnihotri, J.) Present : Shri R.K. Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel La\\yer for the State. ORAL_ORDER (Passed on 29U1 day ofJuly, 2008) 1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. The petitioner claims to be an Assistant Teacher, working in I.E.M. School, Jhagrakhand, District Korea (CG), mn aiid managed by the respondent No. 3. The petitioner without giving details as to what is the nature of the School, why the teachers are at par with other teachers, has filed this petition, praying that the respondents be directed to grant bsnefits of5 Pay Commission w.e.f. 01.01.1996. 3. Be that as it may, it is difficult to decide the issue involved for want of adequate materials with regard to gmnt of 5 Pay Commission to the employees. (J^ 4. This Court has already considered and decided the same issue on 06.02.2007 in the matter of A. Lall (Smt.) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others1 (W.P. No. 4108 of2005) and other connected matters. 5. It is not necessaiy to approach this Court directly when the law 011 a particular issue has already been settled. The petitioner may make a representation to the concerned authorities, if so advised, in the light of lavv settled by this Court in the niatter of A. Lall (Smt) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others (Supra). 6. This petition is accordingly disposed of with the above stated liberty. No order as to costs. i Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sahu ' 2007 (1) BLJ 265