IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 2113 of 2002 Between: 1. D.Paidithalliamma W/o Appalanaidu H.No.10-3-42, Kailashnagar, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. 2 Oorukota Veeramma W/o Venkatnaidu H.No.10-3-42, Kailashnagar, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Gajuwaka Municipality Rep by its Commissioner, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners: None Counsel for the Respondents: --- The Court made the following : ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… to issue a order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in illegally demolishing the House bearing No.10-3-42 and 10-3-43 situated at Kailshnagar, Gajuwaka, Municipality, without issuing any notice, without enquiry, the petitioner land under the land Acquisition Proceedings as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess from the petitioner's property without following due process of law and pay the compensation to the petitioner's house bearing No.10-3-42 & 10-3-43 situated at Kailshnagar, Gajuwaka Municipality”. This Writ Petition was taken up for hearing on 13- 8-2009. As no one appeared for the petitioners on that day, the case was adjourned to 21-8-2009 for being posted under the caption “for dismissal”. On 21-8-2009 the case was adjourned to 28-8-2009 on the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. On 11-9-2009 when the case was called, a further request was made by the learned counsel for the petitioners for adjournment. Accordingly, the case was adjourned. Today, when the case, listed under the caption “for dismissal”, was called, there is no representation for the petitioners. Hence, it is reasonable to presume that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissal in default. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.2488 of 2002 is dismissed as infructuous. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:18-9-2009 MNR