THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 20300 OF 2008 O R D E R: The petitioner is an Ex-chairperson of the Inturu Yerukala Fishermen Cooperative Society, the 4 th respondent herein. The said Society was carved out of a larger Society, viz Amarthalur Yanadi Fishermen Cooperative Society Limited. Disputes on several aspects emanated and exist, as to the membership, in the 4th respondent Society. Substantial members of the parent Society approached this court, by ﬁling several writ petitions, including the one in W.P.No.21737 of 2001, insisting that they are entitled to become members of the 4th respondent society. Directions were issued with certain conditions, in the said writ petition. Ultimately, the Assistant Director of Fisheries, Guntur, the 2nd respondent herein, issued proceedings dated 6.10.2006, directing the Person-in-charge of the 4th respondent Society, to admit 37 members and to take certain other steps. Petitioner ﬁled O.A.No.25 of 2008, before the A.P. Cooperative Tribunal, Vijayawada, challenging the memo dated 16.10.2006. He ﬁled M.A.No.19 of 2008, for stay of the said memo. Through its order dated 27.8.2008, the Tribunal dismissed the M.A. Hence, this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Cooperation. The petitioner opposes the admission of new members into the 4th respondent Society, which is now under the administration of a Person-in-charge. It is not a case, where the Person-in-charge is proposing to admit any person, on his own accord. A perusal of the memo, dated 16.10.2006 issued by the 2nd respondent, discloses that the directions issued by this Court, as regards admission of 37 members, remained unimplemented. Strictly speaking, the 2nd respondent had only made an endeavour to ensure compliance with the orders of this court. The Tribunal has also discussed the matter at length and found that there is no basis for the application ﬁled by the petitioner. Reference was made to the various orders passed by this court in diﬀerent writ petitions, dealing with the membership, as well as other aspects. The personal likes or dislikes of the petitioner herein, cannot be a ground to scuttle the process of membership. Further, the petitioner did not implead the persons, whose admission as members, he intended to scuttle. At any rate, the admission of the members, in pursuance of the memo, dated 16.10.2006, would always be subject to the outcome of the appeal itself. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed, by observing that the admission of any members to the 4th respondent Society, would be subject to the outcome of O.A.No.25 of 2008. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ 18th September 2008 PAN