^^^^ ?"s- '^ ^'B) ^.5.^ ""^' '?^F ^FFil^R, ^TTtwi^ fe^RT^ ^ii^f^i^N" ?l^-3?i^T^|W ^w^r%^i8%- "^200 ^I^T TR^ ('^^^T) ^^ii^pt's?fi^ ^i^? Single Bench; Hon'ble MrJ (Petition under Art.226 ^Rfer^? ^nwff ^ fe^ TS^^: ^T^Rw^??^ Justice Dhirendra Mishral Writ Petition 1 No.775/2009 [of Constitution of India) PETITIONER Reshaml^l Bharadwaj, S/o Late Shri Mangal Das Bharadv^j, aged about 66 years, Retired Lecturer Govemn^ent Higher Secondary School, Jaijaipur, Block-Ja|jaipur, Distt. Janjgir Champa (CG) R/o Village a] Jaijaipur,] Versus RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. State of Mantrala^ja, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) The Di Governm^nt, Raipur (CG). 06.02.2009 The Distrj (C.G.) Mr. A.S. Rajput, Adv. for the| the post of Upper Division Teachei| id post- Hasaud, Near Electric Office, Tahsil Distt. Janjgir Champa (CG) ^hhattisgarh, through: Secretary, Education ector, Public Instruction Chhattisgarh ct Education Officer, Distt. Janjgir- Champa petitioner. Ms. S. Jain, P.L. forthe Stalje. Heard. Case of the petitioner is that h^ was appointed on the post of Assistant Teacher in the year 196^. Thereafter, he was promoted to through interview in the year 1979. He was promoted to the post of H^ad Master on 30.9.1988 in the pay scale of Rs.5500-175-9000/-. He ^vas again promoted on the post of Lecturer in the pay scale of Rs.£]500-175-9000/- on 7.1.2000. The post of Lecturer is a Gazetted/ Class-II Post and the Lecturer has greater responsibilities as compajed to Head Master and therefore, ^n^r^ ^•^^ u$.'3T?<^TT^f4K^^'—£<'S/95—4 I /2008—1,00,000, ^^- ^^ -3^E[ "^qTZjT^T^ 'gF^FT^, [o{c'1S^I^< ^TN<W »*<1<^ "^ 200 ^T^IT TR^> ('^t^^r) 3^T^FT^^r ^IT 3??^T ^Ri^ ^<nw^s^ ^T^T .^ the petitioner was entitled for benefit and he ought to have been allowed a Learned counsel for the petiti' petitioner is squarely covered by the W.P. (s) No.616/08 between P. Sat^anarayana Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others. He further suki representation forthe above benefits| same has not been considered by th^ Learned counsel for the S1 petitioner files representation for red^ concerned authority of respondents, t| decided by the concerned authority in passed in W.P. (s) No.616/08. In view of the above submission ^Nwft^ ^I^^T^ f^Q ^f^RgK iT3tRml3n^T =>f 22D of the Fundamental Rules tlditional increments in his salary. >ner submits that the case of the order dated 27.3.2008 passed in |mits that he has already made |vide Annexure P-5, however, the respondents. [ate submits that in case the ^rssal of his grievance before the ^e same shall be considered and lerms of the order dated 27.3.2008 of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of with li^erty to the petitioner to make fresh representation along with copy ofthis p^tition and certified copy ofthis order before the concerned authority of the r^spondent. On such representation being made, the concerned authority |of the respondents is directed to consider and decide the same in terms (^i the order dated 27.3.2008 passed in W.P. (s) No.616/08. However, thi order shall be subject to all verifications made by the State regar<|ing facts pleaded in the petition Certified copy as per rules. | — j Sd/- Dbirendra Mishra Judge ^;T^r'T^f-^[^TT^:fT^RI^Tf^—^S/9S—i 1/2008—1,00,000.