IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 22ND MARCH 2011 / 1ST CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 17342 of 2010(P) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. KERALA MARA VYAVASAYA ASSOCIATION, POST KAKKAYANGAD, KANNUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY JOHNY ROCKY, S/O.ROCKY, VICHAT HOUSE,VELLARVALLY AMSOM, THONDIYIL DESOM,P.O.THONDIYIL, THALASSERY TALUK. 2. T.F.SEBASTIAN, S/O.FRANCIS, PRESIDENT,KERALA MARA VYAVASAYA ASSOCIATION, KAKKAYANGAD, RESIDING AT THAIPADATH HOUSE, P.O.KAKKAYANGAD, KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. MARY JOHNY, W/O.JOHNY ROCKY, VICHAT HOUSE,VELLARVALLY AMSOM,THODIYIL DESOM, P.O.THONDIYIL, THALASSERY TALUK, REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER JOHNY ROCKY, -DO- 4. T.J.GEORGE,S/O.JOSEPH,BUSINESS,RESIDING AT THUMBEPARAMBIL (H),ST.JUDGE NAGAR,KILIYANTHARA P.O,AYYANKUNNU AMSOM DESOM, THALASSERY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT,REP.BY HIS POWER ATTORNEY HOLDER,, JOSE @ JOSEPH,S/O.POULOSE,BUSINESS,RESI AT KOZHIPATTU HOSUE,ANGADIKKADAVU P.O., 5. K.S.JOHN,S/O.XAVIER,KALAPURACKAL HOUSE, KANICHAER P.O.,KELAKAM,KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR. SAJU.S.A RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, FOREST & WILD LIFE DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. :2: 3. CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS (SPECIAL AFFORESTATION)& NODAL OFFICER,CONVENER, STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE FOR WOOD BASED INDUSTRIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. CENTRAL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE (CONSTITUTED BY THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA IN W.P.(C)NO.202/95 & 171/96),REPRESENTED BY MEMBER SECRETARY,2ND FLOOR,CHANAKYA BHAVAN, CHANAKYA PURI,NEW DELHI. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. T.K. ARAVINDAKUMAR BABU R4 BY MR. P. PARAMESWARAN NAIR, ASG OF INDIA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P (C) No. 17342 of 2010 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 22nd day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT When the case taken up on 09.02.2011, there was no representation for the petitioner. On 10.03.2011 also there was no representation for the petitioner and the case was adjourned. Today also, it is not a case of exception. It appears that, the petitioner is no more interested in the cause of action projected in this Writ Petition. In the said circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd