IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 64 of 2009 Ashok Kumar Verma S/o Late Govind Lal Verma …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ……. Respondents Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for the respondents. 2. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; contents of the F.I.R.; perusal of the counter affidavit, supplementary affidavit and the document filed alongwith the writ petition, I do not find that the petitioner is entitled to get the reliefs claims in the writ petition. 3. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed in limine. 4. I am refraining from commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioner’s case at the trial, which is yet to start. 5. Consequently, the CLMA No. 685 of 2009 also stands disposed of. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 06.03.2009 Shiv