FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.778 OF 2008 -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Mr.N.J.Patil for the petitioner. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 11TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED: 11TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED: 11TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This writ petition is directed against concurrent findings of the courts below in the proceedings arising from Exhibit-5 application filed by the petitioner-plaintiff. It appears that the petitioner instituted a suit for perpetual injunction in the second week of January, 2006. Since then till this date no interim or ad-interim order has been passed in favour of the petitioner. Both the courts below have considered the case set up by the parties and have refused to grant interim order, as prayed in Exhibit-5 application. Considering the reasons stated in the impugned orders I do not find any reason to interfere with the same in the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence the writ petition is dismissed. However, looking to the nature of prayers made in the suit, the trial Court shall endeavour to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible and preferrably within a period of one year from the date of receipt of this order on merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the observations made in the impugned orders. The petition is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)