^s^ ^yy .t0'^.. <^/ ^ -^.-^-^-....-.—......—.-. (^ \^] _ Sl^iGLE BEWCH IN THE HON'BLEHIGH COURTOFCHHATTISGARH AT BSLASPUR W.P;(S) N0. <^<aM 1 /2011 PETIT80NER : Ghanshyam Jain, aged about 33 years, S/o Shri Sukalram Jain, By caste Kaiar, Secretary Gram Panchayat Basanvahi, Viilage Bheemadih, Tahsil Narharpur, Distt. Utter Baster Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS ^1"' RESPODNENTS 1: State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Panchayat & Social Weifare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector Distt. Utter Baster Kanker (C.G.) 3.e Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Kanker Distt. Kanker (C.G.) 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Narharpur, Distt. Utter Baster Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONST8TUTION OF JNDIA / ^ '/d\/ PETITIONER HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR WRIT PETiTION (S) N0. 5341 OF 2011 Ghanshyam Jain Versus RESPQNDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Artlcte 226/227 ofthe Constitution of india) Slngle Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri D.N.Prajapati, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER (Passed on this 12trl day of September, 2011) 1. Chalienge in thispetition istothe orderdated 27.08.2011 (Annexure P-1), whereby. the petltioner working as Panchayat Secretary, Viliage Panchayat Basanvahi, Biock Narharpur, has been posted in the office of the Deputy Director, Panchayat & Sociai Weifare, Kanker. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that under the gusdeiines of semce condition of Panchayat Karmi, CIause 8 dearly provides that the transfer can be made within the District only on the basls of compiaint. 3. On perusal of the reievant Ciause, it is ctear that the transfer/posting can be made within the District on administrative grounds, on the request of the employee and further on a compiaint made against the employee. in the instant case, it appears that the posting has been done on the ground of administrative exigency. Thus, there is no . infirmity or iliegaiity in the impugned order dated 27.08.201 1. 4. Accordingiy, the writ petition is dlsmissed. Sd/- i SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Ashok