1 jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 79 OF 2009 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2654 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 2133 OF 2008 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 758 OF 2009 IN APPEAL NO. 79 OF 2009 IN NOTICE F MOTION NO. 2654 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 2133 OF 2008 Anuradha Santosh Gore & Anr. ..Appellants Vs. Ritesh Kishore Nairyani & Anr. ..Respondents .... Ms. Kavita Lalwani Advocate for Appellants Mr. Y.K.Tiwari and Mr.Shailesh Rai i/b Mr.K.P.Tiwari and Co. for Respondents .... CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : 14th JANUARY, 2010 P.C.: 2 1. During the pendency of this Appeal, the parties have negotiated on an amicable settlement and have been successful in arriving at the settlement terms. The settlement terms have been reduced in writing in the form of Consent Terms. The Consent Terms agreed and signed by the parties, are placed before us. The parties are present before the Court and stated that the settlement had been voluntary and with full understanding and that the terms therein are known to them and they are in the interest of the respective parties. They have further declared that the disputes between the parties, have been settled by them on the basis of the terms which they have agreed upon. 2. The Consent Terms are marked as `X ’ for identification. The learned Counsel therefore, pray for disposal of the Appeal in terms of the Consent Terms. 3. The Appeal is therefore, disposed in terms of the Consent Terms and the office to draw a decree accordingly. 4. Notice of Motion No. 758 of 2009 does not survive and is disposed off accordingly. [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [ B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. ] 3