SBCMA No.93/2009 Smt. Leela Vs. Dhannaram & Ors. 1 SBCMA No.93/2009 Smt. Leela Vs. Dhannaram & Ors DATE OF ORDER : - 16.3.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Sanjeet Purohit for the appellant. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the appellant . The appellant-claimant Smt. Leela is aggrieved against the low award of compensation by award dated 23rd Sept., 2008 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sojat, District Pali. According to learned counsel for the appellant the appellant suffered fracture and her hand was operated and steel rod was fixed in her hand. She suffered 10% disability, yet the total compensation awarded to the appellant is Rs.32,000/- which is too low. I considered the submissions of learned counsel for the appellant and perused the reasons given in the award. Only it has been proved by the appellant-claimant that she suffered fracture in her hand. But it is clear from the SBCMA No.93/2009 Smt. Leela Vs. Dhannaram & Ors. 2 medical report and the statement of the doctor that the appellant suffered a fracture in the hand, but she was not operated nor steel rod was fixed and total disability of 10% was with respect to her hand only and not with respect of her entire body. In view of the above, the tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.15,000/- for the injury and on other counts so as to make the total award of Rs.32,000/-. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in this appeal and the same is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-