IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 17TH OCTOBER 2008 / 25TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 22927 of 2003(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- K.S.R.T.C., REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.T.RAVIKUMAR, SC, KSRTC SRI.JOHNSON P JOHN, SC, KSRTC. RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TRICHUR, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SRI.VIJAYAKUMAR, VAKAYIL HOUSE, PERINGOTTUKARA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.P.K.RAVI KRISHNAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.22927/2003 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE ERNAKULAM - PALAKKAD SCHEME DT.21.2.1966 EXT.P2: COPY OF THE TRICHUR - VADAKKANCHERRY & TRCHUR - PEECHI SCHEMES DT.1.2.1966. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE NOTICE DT.3.4.2003. //TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.22927 OF 2003 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of October, 2008 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~~~~ The petitioner, K.S.R.T.C. challenges Ext.P3 ( in the prayer portion it is wrongly mentioned as Ext.P4) notice for holding timing conference on three routes in Thrissur District. K.S.R.T.C. is aggrieved by the grant of permit on the 1st route, that is, Pudukad - Mannuthi- Trichur. But, the challenge against the notice holding a timing conference is not maintainable in law. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. (K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE) ps