IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32092 of 2008 RAKESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.8.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Bihar. This court vide order dated 10.10.2007, passed in Cr misc no. 37478 of 2007 granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner till filing of the charge sheet. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no tangible material still police filed charge sheet under section 406 and 420 of the penal code. He further submits that petitioner moved the learned session’s court for anticipatory bail which was rejected vide order dated 23.5.2008. It is further submitted that one Sunil Pathak who in fact is named in the FIR has been granted anticipatory bail by a bench of this court as mentioned in para 35 of the petition. It is also submitted that the compromise has been arrived at between the parties in support of which he refers to annexure 10 and 10A of the supplementary affidavit. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that parties have compromised the matter, this court directs that in the event of arrest /surrender, the petitioner would be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- with tow sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Complaint case no. 491C of 2006, apart from furnishing cash sureties deposited earlier. Shashi. (S.P.Singh,J) 2