1N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR M/s LAXMANBHAI CONSTRUCTION (INDIA) PRIVATE LHWITED COMPANY I . x t; {BUILDING & CIVIL ENGINEERING L’ k v ;" f .’ $' I , [a _. -' CONTRACTORS, gy I I j A’ o ”I“y . . ’ / ,, Duly incorporated and Registerd under "\ - the Indian (bog _. . \‘4‘ Sat? I’ ,,if Companies Act, 1956, bearing registration No. 30171/ \ %®"@‘?' f" ~ 83, having it’s Registered Office at 97, Bajaj Bnawan, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400 02 1. Versus RESPONDENTS : (1) STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Through it’s Secretary, Department ofEnergy and Natural Resources, Sachivalaya, Bhopal MP.) (2) MADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITYBOARD, Through it’s Chainnan, Rampur, Jabalpur (M.P.) fa) STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, [f Through it’s Secretary, j Department ofEnergyMantralaya, f/ D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) J (4) CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY V BOARD, - ‘ LI Through it’s Chainnan, Raipur (C.G.) (5) THE EXECUTIVEENGINEER (Civil Maintenance) (Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board) Now - Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Korba (West)Distt. Korba (C.G.) “FEE , @ - 2 - " WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONST! ! UTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERT [ORARL MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT ORWRITS ORDEROR ORDERS, DIRECTION ORDIRECTIONS : A 1 Vt mtg. HIGH ¢OURT OF JUDIGATURI CHI-IAN! : ILABPUR awe Bench: Hol’ble 3hr! Satkh K. Apihotri, J. v W. P. No. 1969 OF 20% Petitioner : M] s. Laxmanbhai Construch‘on Pr. Ltd. .vwx Respondenis : State of Madhya Pradesh g Othem. Versus Shri K.N. Nanrle, counsel ibr thc peh'tioner. , Shri Soumbh Shanna; counsel for the respondent No.4: ' Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Government Advocate for ' the State. ORAL ORDER . (33“ Ant“: 3005’ LA. No. 9562/2005 and LA. No. 4438/2006, applicah'ons‘ for Withdrawal of the writ petin'on. 2. beamed counsel for the peh'tw‘ner, submits that in View of the estahlishment of the Arbitration Tribunal, the relief claimed in this petition has become inh'uctuous, to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents. have no objection. The appliraminns are onleted, as’pmyed fof. Consequently, the writ petimn stands dismissed as withdxawn. No order as to costs.