[1] DBSAW 55/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR JUDGMENT D.B. SPECIAL APPEAL(WRIT) NO. 55/2010 IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 9699/2009 SMT. PRIYANKA AWASTHI Vs. PERMANENT LOK ADALAT, DAUSA & ORS. Date: 08.02.2010. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. **** By way of the present special appeal the appellant/petitioner has challenged the order dated 21.08.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9699/2009, whereby the writ petition has been dismissed which was filed challenging the judgment of the Permanent Lok Adalat, Dausa dated 06.02.2009, by which the claim of the petitioner for compensation of the stolen vehicle has been denied on the ground that the said vehicle has been registered in another State and in the FIR No. 64/2007, the police has submitted final report. The learned Single Judge having considered the final report submitted by the police and having gone through the record of the writ petition and considering the submissions made by the counsel for the appellant/petitioner, declined to interfere with [2] DBSAW 55/2010 the judgment passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat dated 06.02.2009, Dausa and dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner/appellant failed to give some proof of the fact that the vehicle has been stolen. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment of the Permanent Lok Adalat, Dausa dated 06.02.2009 and the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 21.08.2009, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal on the ground that the final report was given by the police as the vehicle in question was not traceable and the same was missing and this aspect has not been properly considered by the learned Single Judge as well as the Permanent Lok Adalat. We have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant and carefully gone through the order impugned dated 21.08.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge as also the order dated 06.02.2009 passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat and the final report submitted by the police. The Permanent Lok Adalat having considered the final report given by the police and after carefully going through the relevant record, passed the impugned judgment dated 06.02.2009 and denied the claim of the petitioner for compensation of the stolen vehicle and the judgment of the Permanent Lok Adalat has been upheld by the learned Single Judge vide order impugned dated 21.08.2009. [3] DBSAW 55/2010 We find no illegality or error in the impugned judgment dated 06.02.2009 passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat, Dausa and the order of the learned Single Judge dated 21.08.2009. No interference whatsoever is called for. Consequently, the special appeal fails being devoid of merit and the same is hereby dismissed. (MAHESH BHAGWATI),J. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/