THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR Civil Revision Petition No. 454 of 2006 Order: This revision is directed against the orders dated 09.02.2005 passed in E.P. No. 130 of 2002 in O.P. No. 212 of 1988 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Warangal. The only contention of the learned Government Pleader for Arbitration, appearing for the petitioner/judgment debtor, in this revision is that the lower Court has made its own calculation rejecting the calculation memos filed by the petitioner and the respondents and that the lower Court ought to have accepted one of the calculations made by either party. It is also his submission that the lower Court being the executing Court is not supposed to go beyond the decree and the calculations made by the lower Court are beyond the scope of the decree. The respondents herein are the claimants. The respondents/claimants, whose lands were acquired by the Government, were awarded compensation @ Rs.20,000/- per acre with interest at 12% p.a., towards additional market value from 15.01.1982 to 24.03.1987 and solatium at 30% p.a., on the market value of the acquired lands, as per the award made in OP No.212 of 1988 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Warangal, dated 21.04.1998. It was also held that the respondents herein i.e., the claimants are entitled to claim interest @ 9% p.a., on the market value for the first year from 15.01.1982 and for the subsequent period at 15% p.a. When the respondents herein filed EP, both the parties have filed respective calculation memos. However, the executing Court i.e., the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Warangal, has made his own calculation and held that the petitioner herein is liable to pay a sum of Rs.3,68,971/- and further directed to pay the said amount within two months. Aggrieved by the same, this revision has been filed. Though it is argued that the calculation made by the lower Court is against the decree, but nothing specific has been pointed out to show how it is beyond the scope of the decree. More over, it appears that the order passed by the lower Court is in consonance with the decree made in the OP. The learned Government Pleader has also submitted that the respondents are entitled to interest from the date of possession. However, since it is submitted that the lower Court has not followed the guidelines in Sunder v. Union of India[1], I consider it just and reasonable to set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the lower Court. Accordingly, the CRP is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. The matter is remitted to the lower Court. Both the parties are directed to file fresh calculation memos and after considering the same and after hearing both the parties the lower Court shall pass just and reasonable order in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, in the circumstances, no costs. ______________________ B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J. Date: 17.02.2011 Nsr [1] 2001(5) ALD 136 (SC)