IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33430 of 2010 UDAY KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.09.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 30.05.2010 in a case registered under Sections 390,402, 414 of the I.P.C. and Section 25(1-B)A/26-35 of the Arms Act. It is alleged that on raid, six persons were arrested and from house of the petitioner one ring, watch, seven sim cards and two mobile phones were recovered. It is submitted that prior to lodging of the present case, the petitioner was involved only in a case under Section 498A of the I.P.C. but subsequent to the present case the petitioner has been involved in two other cases. It is submitted that the petitioner prior to the present case was never implicated in similar nature of offence. Considering the general nature of recovery and the fact that at the time of lodging of present case, the petitioner was not involved in any case of similar nature, let the 2 petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. Danapur, in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 159 of 2010. Learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner gets himself involved in similar nature of offence. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)