IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2010 / 26TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 18659 of 2010(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHARIQ AHAMMED, PROP. GEE M AGENCIES, MANJAKULAM ROAD, PALAKKAD BY ADV. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR SRI.T.G.ABHILASH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, FIRST CIRCLE, COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM. 3. INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.V.K.SHAMSUDEEN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 18659 of 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T Aggrieved by Ext.P1 assessment order in respect of assessment year 2008-2009, the petitioner has approached the second respondent by filing Ext.P2 appeal along with Ext.P3 application for stay. The grievance of the petitioner is that without any regard to the pendency of the proceedings, the third respondent has issued Ext.P5 notice under the Revenue Recovery Act, which is sought to be intercepted in this writ petition. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents as well. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the third respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 petition for stay, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that till such orders are passed on Ext.P3 application W.P.(C) No.18659/2010 2 for stay, all further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P5 notice shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE. nj.