IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21206 of 2010 NAWAL RAI, SON OF SHREE PANCHI RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.07.2010 Supplementary affidavit filed today be kept on the record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Subsequently, Section 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code was added. The prosecution case is that two persons namely, Ravi Prakash and one Sanjay Singh were shot dead by the accused persons. The specific overt act against the petitioner is that he fired at the waist of the deceased Sanjay but the submission is that no corresponding injury has been found on his person. However, I find that the reason for the occurrence is that earlier deceased Ravi Prakash had filed a case against the petitioner and others under Section 384 I.P.C. which had ended in final report with a recommendation under Sections 182 and 211 of the Cr. P.C. for initiating proceeding against him but the deceased Ravi Prakash had pursued the matter and filed a protest petition and, therefore, the accused were inimical to him. Considering the totality of the occurrence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 2 The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court shall ensure quick disposal of the case in view of the fact that the matter is very serious. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)