IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.1351 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 9.11.2010 Smt. Joginderjit Kaur … Appellant Versus The State of Punjab and others …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.M.Kumar Hon’ble Ms.Justice Ritu Bahri Present: None for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.Kumar, J. The instant appeal filed under Section X of the Letters Patent is directed against order dated 29.4.2010 rendered by Single Judge. While disposing of the writ petition, the learned Single Judge has recorded that the duplicate service book of the appellant has been prepared and no objection with regard to entries made in the service book was raised. It has been further found that there was no averment in the writ petition with regard to the date of entitlement for grant of increments/crossing of efficiency bar/promotion. In the absence of a specific averment, learned Single Judge adopted the course of relegating the appellant to the remedy of filing a representation before the respondents. It was further directed that if any such representation was filed, the same shall be disposed of in accordance with law by passing of a speaking order within a period of two months thereafter. LPA No.1351 of 2010 (O&M) We find no legal infirmity in the order passed by the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, we find that the appeal is wholly misconceived and the same is hereby dismissed. (M.M.Kumar ) Judge (Ritu Bahri) Judge 09.11.2010 sd 2