IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.554 of 2008 UPENDRA NARAYAN SINGH, SON OF LATE CHANDI PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA CHITRAGUPTA COLONY, P.S. JAMUI, DISTRICT JAMUI. ---Petitioner VERSUS 1. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 2. THE FINANCE OFFICER, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 3. THE REGISTRAR, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. ---Respondents ----------- 10. 8.4.2010 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Mr Ashok Kumar Keshari, learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent-University and submits that on perusal of the chart, as contained in Annexure F to the fourth counter affidavit, it would appear that the admissible retiral dues have been paid as detailed therein. It is further submitted that, however, there is also claim of the petitioner with regard to the payment of pre-retiral dues and as such in case the petitioner places his claims before the authority concerned, the same would be considered as per law. In the above circumstances, this Court is not inclined to dismiss the writ application, rather permits the petitioner to represent his left out grievances before the Registrar, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur (respondent no.3). In case such grievances by way of representation is filed stating the details of his claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of eight weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation shall be considered in accordance with 2 law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation may be settled at the earliest and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid within the aforesaid times. However, upon consideration, if any of the claims or part of the claims is found not admissible, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)