^ c "> IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURfCHHATnSGARH^ WRIT PEHTION NO.J??/<r/2004 PETniONER ^^•- %^>"'" RESR^DENTS .^^ ^IK ^w Lokesh KumarSahu S/o. Sri D.LSahu Aged about 28 years R/o. VjH. Gatapar, P.0. Kon^a/ Tah - Kund, Dist-Dhamtari C!^ 1) The state ofChhaffisgarti Tlirough the seCTefcary, Educatfon Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, RaipurC.G 2) Di'strict Blucation officer, Dhamtan District Dhamtari, C.6. PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA K3R ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRFTS. DIREOnONS ANO/OR ORDERS XI-HC-22 ^TT^I'SFT 'R[;ti?F3^?T 5t>^i<=t» ^f^a L..^_..- ^^ '3'^ '^ITqT^FI, '^ftWTS, [^crtl^y 3T[^T ^^K M^Ho. ^^^/2^o^ ,^^..;..............................^..^ ^QQ WR€fTT5hN|ch •^f^Vf' ^^ ^«11<9< tll^^l 1^< 27-8-2004 On a inention being made, ttus case is t4ken up. Petitioner/s by Slm £.C^ V^^'^^o( State by Shri V.V.S. Murtfay, Dy. Ad^ and Shri Akhil Agrawal and Shri Sandeq) Dube^, Heard. The matter relates to transfer offhe peti^ Counsel for the petitioner/s subnutte<j efFected fflegally in contravention oflaw and polij State counsel submitted that the petiti^ner/s serving iiotice for demand ofjustice 'and represerjtation. Hav-ing heard aiid considered the rivai merits ofthe case, iii the opinion.ofthis Coiirt, <» to the petitioiier/s to niake detailed representati|)n ^d Stat: /^ov^r^nienl/competeiit authority ofth$ this order, withni 10 day.s, and cn Govemment/coinpetent authority of the saine on its own merits in accordaiice with lawl a-om the dare of receipVproduction of the ic^ giiidelbies is brouglit to the notice, tlie same be c< Counsel for the petidoner/s prays dia grievaiice of the petitioner/s remajuis, lie/she ma( tiie law. It is open to the petidoner to avail the ren With the aforesaid obser\radons, tlus pet Consequendy M.W.P., ifcmy, also stand^ Certified copy 'ds per ailes. Copy to State counsel for con'ipliaiice. ; respond^nts <=bl^(d41'1 'HW^f ^ fe^t Tf^$K "^ ^Tf^TRT ^TT^T .fjrQd^JUL, 'ocate General, ^dth Slm Satish Gupta, D^'\G.A.. Panel Lawyers. lioner fi-om the respective place. that the transfer of the petitioner/s has been i{;y. State counsel opposed it. has straightway filed the petition w-thout c^nteiitions, without expressing any opinioii on the €|ndsofjustice will be sen^ed ifa direction is giveii raising lus//her grievances and grouiids before [respondents along with a copy ofthe petition and ^uch rspresentation being iSled, the State >, under the law, shall consider and decide the |as early as possible preferably within SLX weeks ?F|resentation. If any contraveiition of poiicy or bsidered on its own ments. after the decision of the representation if any' be allovved to avail the remedy available luider ^dy available imder the law. (tion staiids disposed of. disposed of. r Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge 'l:•\ '.^' .c^^^l ^fCL^- ^-:u,^.^ ^]^cf iT^^ ?t^^