The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.19877 of 2010 Date: 01-12-2011 Between: Grindwell Norton Limited, Mumbai, rep. by its Manager- Finance Mr.R.Ramesh ..... Petitioner AND A.P.Electricity Regulatory Commission, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Chairman and 4 others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.C.R.Sridharan Counsel for Respondent No.1: Mr.P.Sriraghu Ram, SC for AP Electricity Regulatory Commission Counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 5: Mr.O.Manohar Reddy, SC for APCPDCL The Court made the following : Order: This Writ Petition is filed assailing Order, dated 05-06-2010, of respondent No.1 whereby it has determined Fuel Surcharge Adjustment (FSA) for the financial year 2008-2009. At the hearing, it has come out that a batch of Writ Petitions, ﬁled raising identical issues and questioning the order of respondent No.1, which is impugned in this Writ Petition, was disposed of by a learned single Judge of this Court on 29-07-2011 in India Cements Ltd. and another vs. Chairman, APSERC, Hyderabad and others[1]. A perusal of the judgment in the aforesaid batch of cases shows that the learned Judge set aside the impugned order of respondent No.1 with liberty to the DISCOMs to ﬁle applications afresh, claiming FSA, and directing respondent No.1 to consider and deicide the same in accordance with law, if and when such applications were filed. Having regard to the above judgment, which applies in all fours to these cases, this Writ Petition is allowed in terms of the said judgment and to the extent indicated therein. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 1st December, 2011 LUR [1] 2011 (5) ALT 188