CWP No. 624 of 2005 12.5.2008 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General for respondents No. 1 & 2. Mr. R.L. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. B.C. Negi and Ms. Shilpa Sood, Advocates for respondents No.3 to 6. Learned Advocate General informed this Court that the State has accepted the proposal regarding fire escape as proposed by the Consultant Architect. Learned Advocate General informed that the complete renovation would be done expeditiously. We would like to further explain the word expeditiously. Accordingly, we indicate the time in words i.e. six months. Earlier a number of interim orders were passed by this Court. In the light of the facts and circumstances indicated before us and assurance by the learned Advocate General, in the interest of justice, it suffices to complete the construction/renovation of fire escape expeditiously within a period of six months. In view of these orders, the petition stands disposed of. (Jagdish Bhalla) Chief Justice. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge. May 12, 2008. (cr/gr)