IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.9468/2008 Decided on:18.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Virender Kumar. …Petitioner. Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Lalit Sehgal, Advocate vice Mr. Peeyush Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Archana Dutt, Advocate for respondent No.4. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he should be regularized as Beldar with effect from 6.11.2002 at par with respondent No.4. It has come in the reply that the petitioner was appointed as daily rated Beldar with effect from 2.4.1994 and was brought on work charge status in 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 October, 2002, after rendering requisite number of years on daily wage basis, as Beldar. Respondent No.4 was appointed as Helper (Store) against muster roll No. 55. Since he has worked as Helper, he has been brought on work charge status in October, 2002 as Helper. The petitioner had already joined his duties as work charge Beldar. Since the petitioner and respondent No.4 had appointed on daily wages in different trades, there cannot be any similarly. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 18.12.2010 *awasthi*