IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2947 of 2011 MRITUNJAY SHARMA SON OF SHRI JANESHWAR SINGH RESIDNE OF VILLAGHE JAITPUR, P.S. HASPURA IN THE DISTRICT OF AURANGABAD. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 14.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Allegedly, the victim was done to death by the petitioner and his other family members on account of non fulfilment of illegal demand. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that during course of the investigation, police found the case true under section 306,201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and considering the above stated fact the other accused have already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by another Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.2.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 2219 of 2011. It is also contended that deceased died of her illness and before her death, she was treated by some doctors who have stated the above stated fact in course of investigation. The impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Araria reveals that in course of 2 investigation some doctors were examined by the I.O. and the said doctors have stated that they had given treatment to the deceased prior to her death. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 55 of 2010. Devendra/ ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)