IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 11978 of 2009 Decided on: 29.12.2010 Rattni Sharma …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Subhash Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that her case has not been considered for promotion to the post of Supervisor from the post of Anganwari Worker. 2. It has come in the reply that in fact, the case of the petitioner was considered, however, she did not qualify the written test. Consequently, since the petitioner has not qualified the written test, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 29, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?