IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15874 of 2008 1. BIJAY KUMAR SAH, SON OF SHRI BAGESHWAR PRASAD SAH MAHAMANTRI, AKHIL BHARAT RACHNATMAK SAMAJ, BIHAR BRANCH 2. RAVISHANKAR MANDAL, SON OF SHRI NARAYAN MANDAL 3. DHARMENDRA KUMAR PASWAN, SON OF SHRI RAMJI PASWAN ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE – GANGAPUR BINOBANAGAR, P.S. SULTANGANJ, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR. ------- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BHAGALPUR. 3. THE ANCHAL ADHIKARI CUM BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICE SULTANGANJ ANCHAL, P.S. SULTANGANJ, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR. 4. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, SULTANGANJ PRAKHAND, P.S. SULTANGANJ, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR. 5. RAM CHARITAR MANDAL, FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN, PRAMUKH, PANCHAYAT SAMITI, SULTANGANJ PRAKHAND, P.S. SULTANGANJ, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR. 6. DINESH PRASAD, SON OF LATE PARMESHWAR YADAV, MUKHIYA, MAGDI GRAM PANCHAYAT, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SHIVDANIPUR, P.S. SULTANGANJ, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR. ------- RESPONDENTS. ----------- For the petitioners : Mr. Amar Nath Mishra, Advocate For the respondents : Mr. Nivedita Nirvikar G.P-XVI -------- 5. 15/1/2009 According to the petitioners for the redressal of their grievance, they have approached the District Magistrate, Bhagalpur, but till date no action has been taken. Having heard Mr. Amar Nath Mishra for the petitioners, GP-XVI for the State and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it expedient that respondent No. 2, the District Magistrate, Bhagalpur, takes decision in accordance with law without unnecessary delay. It is made clear that we have not expressed any - 2 - opinion in regard to the claim made by the petitioners and that shall be looked into by the District Magistrate. Application stands disposed of. S.Ali (Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, ACJ.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)