1 caf6279-08 rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6279 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2401 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. ..... Mr. Venkatesh A. Shastry i/b. Ms. Rajlakshmy for the applicants. Mr. Mohandas i/b. ALMT Legal for the respondent. ..... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2011. P.C.: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicants and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. The application is opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. The submission is that at the time of admission of the Appeal, this Court declined to grant any ad-interim relief. 2. Perusal of the order passed on 15th April, 2 caf6279-08 2009 shows that this Court issued Rule and recorded the statement of the learned counsel appearing for the applicants that the applicants were not pressing for any order on the Civil Application on that day. If intention of this Court was not to grant any interim relief, this Court would not have issued Rule on this application on the same day. 3. Appeal against a preliminary decree for partition is pending for final hearing. Hence, limited interim relief deserves to be granted. Application is disposed of by passing following order: :: O R D E R :: i. Partition proceedings shall continue. However, actual physical partition by metes and bounds shall not be effected without prior permission of this Court. ii. There will be no order as to costs. (A.S.OKA, J.)