^j; :;: ^ ^ Ut 'nHB HICBI COURT OP CaiHATnSGARH AT BIIiASPBR 'f Wrtt Petttton Ho. VI 43 /2004 / PETmONER / RESPONDENTS Gurudeo Prasad Rafhore S/o Late Guha Ram Rafhorc, Y^pd aibout . 28 years, R/o Wll^e - Hala RiiUi, Tahsfl- Khrasia, Dfatfc Raigarb(C.Q.).| -Vvtww- : . . y 1. StateofCliliattisgarh, Throiigh Secretaiy, Fteichfyat & SocialWclfiuc Departnient, Mantral^a, D.K.S. Bfaawan, ShastriChowk, Ralpin-(C.<?.). a aii '^ <..•". / ~—~ .cSy^^. 2. The DtecttM-, ^?^/1'" ^ - '——' W^'~J.> P>anchayat& •^ /^^// ^w/ <-^ ^j> ip' SocaalWeIfaie Department, Maatral^a, D.K.S. Bhawan, Shastri Chcwk, Raipur (C.G.). WRH* PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THB CONSTmjTION OF- INDIA_ FOR ISSUANCE OP ASUn'ABLE WRITOF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. CERTIORARY AND/OR SUITABLE DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THEMArTER, Details offhe petitioa. I. PARTICULARS OPTHE PESTmONER: As per cause tifle. 2. ^RTICULARS OF THE RBSPONDENTS: As pcr cause titfe. 3. RARTT©@1^S^ a-HK^^^^^ AGAINST PETmQNISBEHi^I'lEED: m Xt-HC-22 -ra -<<]<ll<')'4, i?r,)ti'is. 'f^("T[xiy 3ff^ -crag?, ^'.^-(^^ llMJ/o^ W^VS^StSK""""""""""""" """"'"W[ 200 :.-.K. fcl^^ET' 3TRRI W Tc'f[^7 3T^?T ^-fi^ •^fgrf ani'CT-pRiiwgfei +.W;d<il-1 'Wrcfl 4 fstSt ^fiiTRTi: 'iRsiPgirsn^i' 21-12-2005 . i, A I. Petitioner by Shri A JL-< f4^-)<->-i-, Advocate. Shri P.S. Koshy, Dy. Adv. Generalj forthe State. l-1eard. 1 This case relates to compassionate appointment consequent upon the death of an employee semng in the State. j Learned counsel for the petitioner|categorically stated that in this case, the death of the employee has occurred on or after 1 -"j 1 -1997 and not earlier. It is further submitted that in batchofcases bearingW.P. No.1322/^002 involving the same question ordershave been passed by this Court on 20/12/2005. He rfrays that similar orders may be passed in this case also. not dispute the above fact and state that the State of Chhattisgarh has taken a decision |o consider the cases of dependants of those employees who died on or after 1/11/199f strictly in accordance with the policy prevalent at that time. 1 In view of the submissions madp by leamed counsel appearing for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the me its of the case, in the opinion ofthis Court, ends of justice will be served if a direction is give^i to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities concerned to eonsider and decide the c^se of the petitioner in accordance with the policy prevalent atthe time of death of the em|))loyee concemed. If the petitioner found eligible, appointment orders will be issued as eaijy as possible on or before 30 April, 2006. The petitioner is also directed to render due ccjl-0peration to the authorities. It is made clear that if \^ Copy to the State counsel, who respondents for compliance. any gnevance still remains, the petition^r may avail the remedy available under the law jncluding filing of the petition before this C|ourt. With the aforesaid obserfations, tt^is petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. will be obliged to communicate the order to the sd/- Fakhruddin 'i^' "s"i lli.' ^ 9^S -'"k . , ..i,..,^i..T.'..^,...