IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12125 of 2010 OM PRAKASH PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 25.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail in connection with a case registered under section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the F.I.R. it is alleged that the wife of Ram Lakhan conveyed to the informant that this petitioner along with one Uma Shanker have drowned the victim in the river. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the wife of Ram Lakhan has been examined in paragraph-22 of the case diary and she has not supported the version of the informant and the same has not been controverted by learned Addl. P.P. after going through the case diary. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that two witnesses have supported the version of the informant after four months of the occurrence in paragraphs- 72 and 73 of the case diary only because Ram Lakhan’s wife did not support the prosecution case. Moreover, the petitioner is on inimical terms with those two witnesses. It is further submitted that apart 2 from this case, there are two other cases against the petitioner in which he is on bail. Considering the aforesaid submission, particularly the statement of Ram Lakhan’s wife in paragraph-22 of the case diary, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in Hussainganj P.S. Case No.14 of 2009. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J ) BTiwary/