1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3643 of 2008 (Ugamlal s/o Narayanji Gujar vs. The State of Maharashtra) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. G.O.Wattamwar, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. K.M.Suryawanshi, APP for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:25/8/2009 ... P.C.: 1. The applicant requested for release of the explosives seized by the Police. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, by order dt.15.1.2008, allowed the revision partly to the extent of return of the vehicle seized. However, the explosives which were taken charge, are not returned. The learned Judge has referred in para 4 about a letter dt.25.7.2007 produced by the applicant which was not a license. My attention today is drawn to Exh.F purporting to be a 2 license issued on 29.4.1999. Even if one reads this purported license it is not in terms of the Explosive Rules of 1983 in Form No.22 or Form No.23 as the law mandates. The permit was for a period of five years, though the Counsel informs, there is renewal, however, dates are erased, making it 31.4.2009, showing a date which is not in existence. Consequently, based on such certificate, it is difficult to hold that the accused/applicant is legally entitled for retaining explosives. The request cannot be entertained. The order does not suffer from any infirmity. Application rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/3643-08crapl ...