IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.19865 of 2010 Date of Decision:19.12.2011 Roshan Lal .... Petitioner Versus Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others . .. Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. J.K. Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, Advocate for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for the respondents. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of impugned order dated 29.8.2010 (P-5) as well as for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent-authorities not to withdraw the benefits of stepping of pay and not to recover the amount granted in this respect. It is not disputed that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in LPA No.1259 of 2011 decided on 29.8.2011 titled as Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Limited and others v. Satya Pal Nagpal and another as well as in CWP No.20351 of 2008 decided on 14.7.2010 titled as V.B. Nanda & others v. UHBVN and others. CWP No.19865 of 2010 -2- In view of the above, impugned order dated 29.8.2010 (P- 5) is hereby quashed and the present petition is allowed in the same terms as passed in in LPA No.1259 of 2011 decided on 29.8.2011 titled as Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Limited and others v. Satya Pal Nagpal and another as well as in CWP No.20351 of 2008 decided on 14.7.2010 titled as V.B. Nanda & others v. UHBVN and others. 19.12.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE