IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION Suit NO.38 of 2003 Suit NO.38 of 2003 Suit NO.38 of 2003 Mr.Kumar Mahesh Pattani & Another ..Plaintiff versus Mrs.Bhavani Narendra Mehta & Another ..Defendants And Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Limited & Another ..Respondents Mr.Girish Desai i/b.C.D.Patel for the Plaintiff Mr.Y. Divekar i/b. Divekar & Co. for the Defendant No.1. Mr.Meenaz Merchant i/b. H.G.Ganatra for Respondent No.2. Defendant No.1 present in person. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 2nd Dec., 2005 Dated : 2nd Dec., 2005 Dated : 2nd Dec., 2005 P.C. 1. Heard both the learned Advocates. So far as the Plaintiff No.1 is concerned, ‘special authority to compromise’ has been issued in the name of the Advocate. The Defendant No.1 Bhavani N. Mehta is present in person. The Defendant No.2 is present in person in Court. She admits to have signed the terms only after knowing the contents of the same. 2. Office to take necessary steps on the basis of the said order. 3. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Court Associate. (S.R.Sathe, J.)