1 S.B. Civil writ petition No. 11307/2009 Pramod Kumar Choudhary vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order dated 9.12.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Vinay Jain ,for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has challenged the transfer order dated 22nd Oct., 2009 by preferring the appeal before the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, which was dismissed by order dated 10th Nov., 2009. The contention of the petitioner is that petitioner was transferred and within 20 days again he has been transferred inspite of the fact that at the place from where petitioner has been transferred there are vacant posts and it was submitted that number of persons who should have been transferred have not been transferred. I do not find any reason for interference in the order passed by the tribunal dated 10th Nov., 2009 because mere petitioner's remaining posted at one place for 20 days does 2 not create any right in his favour to remain at that place. So far as administrative exigencies is concerned, it is to be presumed that there is administrative exigencies. Therefore, when the transfer order is challenged, it is the employee to challenge and prove the fact that there was no administrative exigencies. Hence, there is no merit in this writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/-