IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2054 of 2010. Smt. Anita Devi. … Petitioner. Vs. State Information Commission, Uttarakhand Dehradun and two others. …Respondents. Mr. B.M.Pingal, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent no.1. Mr. N.P.Sah, Standing Counsel, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2. Date December 06, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Stay Application No. 10174 of 2010) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition, with permission to file fresh petition. Permitted to withdraw. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file objection against the show cause notice before the State Information Commission Uttarakhand and the petitioner may file a writ petition afresh after decision is taken on the show cause notice, if cause of action survives. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP