Writ Petition No.9432 of 2009 10.10.2011 Shri Vijay Assudani, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.L.Nagar, learned counsel for the respondents. With consent heard finally. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is seeking quashment of the order dated 09.12.2009 (Annexure P-11) passed by the third respondent. According to the petitioner, the third respondent cannot act as an Arbitrator in his own cause in view of the law laid down by a Full Bench of this Court in the case of B.B.Verma & another Vs. State of M.P. & another 2007 (III) MPJR (FB) 251. According to the petitioner, the third respondent has not only adjudicated the amount of penalty/compensation but has also threatened to recover it from the security/deposit of the petitioner. It is also the case of the petitioner that the dispute between the petitioner and the respondents is pending consideration before the Arbitrator appointed by the second respondent in view of the arbitration clause existing in the agreement entered into between the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents very fairly stated that the respondents are not proceeding to take any coercive steps in the matter till the dispute is decided by the Arbitrator. In view of the aforesaid stand taken by the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of by directing the respondents not to take any coercive steps in pursuance to the impugned order dated 09.12.2009 (Annexure P-11) till the dispute is decided by the Arbitrator. The prayer appears to be reasonable. Accordingly, without commenting upon the merits of the matter this petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to take any coercive steps against the petitioners in pursuance to the impugned order dated 09.12.2009 (Annexure P-11) till the matter is adjudicated by the Arbitrator. The petition stands disposed of. Cc within three days. (Shantanu Kemkar) (Prakash Shrivastava) Judge Judge AM.