IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 21ST OCTOBER 2008 / 29TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 30464 of 2008(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- PUSHPAVATHY, AGED 55 YEARS, W/O.BALAKRISHNAN, VENKALATH HOUSE, MANATHALA P.O. THIRUVATHRA, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT SRI.RANJIT BABU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. JOINT REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR, THRISSUR,CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY 2. SALE OFFICER/AUTHORISED OFFICER, GURUVAYUR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., GURUVAYOOR, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR. 3. GURUVAYOOR CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK, BLANGAD BRANCH GURUVAYOUR CHAVAKKAD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. R1, R2 BY GOVT. PELADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR R3 BY ADV.SRI.DEVAPRASANTH P.J. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.30464 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT The rights of parties stand governed by Ext.P2. No further situation has arisen. If there is any complaint for the petitioner regarding disobedience of the terms of Ext.P2, that is not a matter for a fresh writ petition. The mere issuance of Ext.P3 by the respondents also would not improve the matter since learned counsel of the bank states that two instalments had not been paid in terms of Ext.P3 for consideration of any representation. Hence, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to work out remedies on the basis of Ext.P2, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.