1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.12.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12435 of 2011 V.Rajan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police (Sub-Urban) Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Othakkadai Police Station, Madurai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the second respondent police to reopen the case and file a final report in Crime No.94 of 2006 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Jegadeeswaran For Respondents : Mr.P.Kannithevan Govt. Advocate (Crl.side) O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent police to reopen the case and file a final report in Crime No.94 of 2006 on the file of the respondent police. 2. Heard Mr.R.Jegadeeswaran, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.P.Kannithevan, learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondents/State. 3. A counter of first respondent has also been filed. 4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petition has been filed seeking a direction against the respondents police to reopen the investigation in Crime No.94 of 2006 on the file of the respondent police and to reinvestigate the same. Therefore, he requests this Court to pass suitable orders in the facts and circumstances of the case. 5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit in his argument that the first respondent, namely the Superintendent of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Police, Madurai District, filed a counter stating that since impersonation and forgery have taken place in this case, the respondent police is willing to reopen the case as requested by the petitioner and also to transfer the same to the District Crime Branch, Madurai for reinvestigation. Hence, he submits that suitable orders may be passed. 6. Considering the submissions and the consent given by the respondent police to reopen the case and to transfer the same to the District Crime Branch for reinvestigation, the case in Crime No.95 of 2006 is ordered to be reopened for reinvestigation and transferred to the file of the District Crime Branch, Madurai for reinvestigation and the same shall be investigated by the District Crime Branch, Madurai, after it is handed over for reinvestigation, as expeditiously as possible. 7. Accordingly the petition is ordered. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (A.E) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police (Sub-Urban), Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Othakkadai Police Station, Madurai District. 3.The District Crime Branch, Madurai. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to Mr.R.Jegadeeswaran, Advocate (SR.No.44778) Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12435 of 2011 20.12.2011 gsr NSV/22.12.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/