BEFOWE £1§E ON‘BLL. MA§HYA PRnuLoI-I ADIKEENIDTRATIVE 1R73UI3AL AT 5A ALVUL 0.1%. NO. {Q’DUv/V /93 i1(3N\I'l‘: ‘ N. RamaW, yaged 52 yrs., S/o 5hr; harayan ’ Accounts Offlcer,.D.R D.A., Jagaalpur, 315111;. BaS bar. v/s' The gtate of f P. ’nhlaugh tha Sacr Lary, Ednance DepLt. Vallwh Bha a $hopalg The ijireckor of Treasijrie$ & Accounts, . Govt. of M.P,., Bhcgal; Snrl Gul¢r§z Iiohammad, Chounts Officer, Nagar Ngam, Bhogal. z AWL: mum mum L ,Amvl‘lmsm Tm; TRYWAL.» A61 a gETAILS OF .AP‘DL€L§ATEO}§ I H . x?PL n, ‘... 6%§\\\\@C) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 777 of2005 APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE ADMINTSTRATIVE TRIBUNAIQ ACT. 1985 SB: Hml’ble Shri Satish K Aogm‘hotri: J. Present: None for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Pane} Lawyer for the State. ORDER ORAL) (Passed on 04 day of November, 2009) 1. The matter is called. for hearing twice. None appears nor any representaiion is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matters 2. In View ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy ofthis order to the petitioner, forthwith. \ Sdl- .i ' Satish K. Agnihom _ w i a ' Judge APPLTCANT K.N.Raman Acharya VERSUS RESPONDENTS The State ofMadhya Pradesh & Others.