1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.9051 OF 2007. PETITION NO.9051 OF 2007. PETITION NO.9051 OF 2007. Tukaram Kuba Shinde : Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & ors. : Respondents. Mr.S.S.Pakale for the petitioner Mr.V.P.Malvankar, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 Mr.S.V.Pitre for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5. CORAM CORAM CORAM : J.N.PATEL & : J.N.PATEL & : J.N.PATEL & S.S.SHINDE, S.S.SHINDE, S.S.SHINDE, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 27th March, 2008. : 27th March, 2008. : 27th March, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court with a grievance that he has been suspended vide 2 order dated 05.04.2007 without complying with the provisions of Rules 34 and 35 of M.E.P.S.Rules, 1981 and, this Court should quash and set aside the suspension order on this ground. 3. The issue is clearly covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Awadesh Awadesh Awadesh Narayan Narayan Narayan K. Singh v. Adarsh Vidya Mandir Trust, K. Singh v. Adarsh Vidya Mandir Trust, K. Singh v. Adarsh Vidya Mandir Trust, reported in 2004(3) Bom.C.R. (F.B.) 669. 2004(3) Bom.C.R. (F.B.) 669. 2004(3) Bom.C.R. (F.B.) 669. Therefore we do not find any reason to interfere with the matter. Needless to say that the petitioner would be entitled to salary as per rules, if the enquiry is not completed within the stipulated period. With these directions, the petition stands disposed of. [J.N.PATEL, [J.N.PATEL, [J.N.PATEL, J] J] J] [S.S.SHINDE, [S.S.SHINDE, [S.S.SHINDE, J] J] J]