IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 5883 of 1994 Between: J.Ranga Reddy S/o.late Chennaiah, hindu, Aged 72 years, r/o.Mogiligidda village, Farooqnagar Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. Joint Collector, Mahaboobnagar District,Mahaboobnagar. 2. Mandal Revenue Officer, Farooqnagar Mandal, Farooqnagar, Mahaboobnagar District. 3. Sirajul Haq S/o.late Sidri Jaharuddin died rep. by his L.Rs. 3 and 4,Sri Chidri Kalimullah S/o.Sirajul Haq, H.No.1.4.839,Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 4. Sri Chidri Nayeemullah S/o.Sirajul Haq, H.No.1.4.839, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 5. Dr.Wahada Begum D/o.Md.Ahmed Hussain, H.No.23-1-562, Babi Bazar, Near Charminar, Hyderabad. 6. Mudugula Narayana S/o.Chandraiah, R/o.Mogiligidda village, Farooqnagar Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. (Writ petition against R.3,R.4 and R.6 dismissed for default as per Orders dated 4.8.1999) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction preferably one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the issuance of impugned proceedings passed by the Joint Collector, Mahabubnagar District, in Appeal No.B7/15/1988 dated 23.8.1993 confirming the orders of the Mandal Revenue Officer, Farooqnagar Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District dt.26.5.1988 in Ref.No.B1/3214/86 and the petitioner prays that the same may be quashed. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.VIDYASAGAR. Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5: M/s.A.Narsimha Reddy & Harender Pershad. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION No.5883 OF 1994 ORDER: Heard both the learned counsel. Admittedly the impugned proceedings arose out of the proceedings initiated under Section 32 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, against which the petitioner has got a remedy of revision under Section 90 thereof. Having regard to the above, the writ petition is not maintainable. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed, with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy of revision. No costs. ______________________ 15.07.2004 cs/skmr ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Joint Collector, Mahaboobnagar District, Mahaboobnagar. 2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Farooqnagar Mandal, Farooqnagar, Mahaboobnagar District. 3. Two C.Cs. to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad.(O.U.T.) 4. Two C.D. copies.