THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 3969 of 2008 Decided on: 02.08.2010 Rakesh Puri …Petitioner -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate vice Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate. For the respondents No. 1 & 2 : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the respondent No. 3 : Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers : “(i) That the order dated May 14, 1990 (Anexure A-1/1) and order dated June 24, 1993 (Annexure A-1/3) may be quashed and set aside. (ii) That the proceedings conducted by the Registrar under Section 60 of the Himachal Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1968 may be held to be Illegal and of no consequence. All orders passed on the basis of the proceedings conducted by the Deputy Registrar be declared invalid. 2. These reliefs could not be granted by the erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal under the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, since these orders have been 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? . -2- passed under the Himachal Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1968. In view of this, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with the liberty reserved to approach the appropriate Forum in accordance with law. It is made clear that since the petitioner had been pursuing wrong remedies, benefit under Section 14 of the Limitation Act shall be available to him. 3. In light of above, the petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge August 2, 2010 (K. Attri)