1 S. B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2232/2008 DHARAM PAL V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & OTHERS. DATE OF ORDER ::: 04/04/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI Mr. R.S.Choudhary, for Petitioner (s). This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner Dharam Pal, though perusal of the revision petition reveals that it was filed by Subhash Sharma who appeared before the concerned Minister and requested to issue notices to the respondent and to pass an appropriate interim order. In view of the above, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is not maintainable as it is in reference to the revision, wherein petitioner is not a party. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already moved an application before the concerned Minister for substitution of the name of the petitioner in place of Subhash Sharma. If that is so, the application, said to have been filed by the petitioner needs to be decided by the Minister concerned first. Then only petitioner will get locus. In view of the above, so far as the present writ petition is 2 concerned, it cannot be entertained unless petitioner is substituted in place of Subhash Sharma in the revision. If application has already been moved by the petitioner for substitution, then the Minister concerned is expected to decide the same expeditiously, but in no case later than thirty days, from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, inasmuch as even revision petition filed, is required to be decided and not to keep it pending. If petitioner is substituted in place of Subhash Sharma in the revision petition and any grievance remains, then he would be at liberty to file a fresh writ. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is dismissed. (M. N. BHANDARI), J. scd