IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40739 of 2008 RAJ KUMAR @ PAPPU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.10.2008 Heard Sri Shakti Suman Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel for the Informant. The case is under Section 498A IPC and the contention is that the parties have compromised the case in the court below. The Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha shall satisfy himself about the compromise by calling the lady into his court and if he is so satisfied, shall enlarge the above named petitioner on bail on execution of a bond of Rs.3,000/-(three thousand)with one surety to his own satisfaction in Complaint Case No.C-116 of 2006(Tr.No.1363 of 2008). B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )