IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3852 of 2010 BALESHWAR PRASAD Son of Late Hari Prasad, resident of Village Babhandiha, P.S. Hilsa, District Nalanda. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through Mr. Anup Mukherjee the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna. 2. Mr. B.K. Verma, the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 3. Mrs. Dr. N. Vijay Lakshmi the Director, I.C.D.S. Bihar, Patna. 4. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, the District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif. 5. Mr. Chandrashekhar Prasad Singh, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda. 6. Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, the District Programme Officer, Nalanda at Biharsharif. 7. Mr. Vijay Kumar, the Block Development Officer, Hilsa, Nalanda. 8. Mrs. Anjana Singh, the Child Development Project Officer, Hilsa, Nalanda. ----------- 3 22.11.2010 Heard the parties. The present contempt application has been filed alleging inaction on the part of the respondents in not complying the order of the Division Bench of this Court dated 9.3.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 4101 of 2010. A show cause has been filed by the official respondents stating therein that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hilsa vide Memo No. 493/Conf. Dated 14.9.2010 and also 510/conf. Dated 24.9.2010 asked the petitioner to specify the Anganbari Kendra if any, where inspection with respect to irregularities could be conducted, but the petitioner did not respond. In paragraph no.8 of the show cause it has been stated that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hilsa vide letter No.1070/Legal (Gen.) dated 27.9.2010 forwarded the enquiry report to the District Magistrate, Nalanda which was subsequently sent to the District Programme Officer, Nalanda vide letter No. 2 2167/Leg. Dated 1.10.2010 to take necessary action as per law. It has further been stated that the Government has authorized the District programme Officer to take necessary action in case of irregularities detected in the functioning of I.C.D.S. Centres. In view of the statements made in paragraph nos. 7 and 8 of the show cause, we do not find any reason to interfere with the orders passed by the authorities concerned. Accordingly, this M.J.C. application is closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach this Court again against any further inaction on the part of the official respondents. (T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Kishore K. Mandal, J.) Abhay Kumar