IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 22843 of 2011 Ganeshi Chaudhary, S/o Prameshwar Chaudhary. Versus The State of Bihar ---------------- 03. 22.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is named in the First Information Report and subsequently the kidnapped victims were released also named the petitioner. It was added later on that the co-accused persons were demanding one lakh rupees. Considering the nature of allegations, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. In the meanwhile, the Trial Court is directed to send a list of witnesses fixing specific dates to the S.P. concerned along with the copy of this order who will ensure the attendance of the witnesses on the said dates so that there is no further delay in trial. The S.P. Khagaria is directed to ensure the attendance of the absconding accused namely Umesh Chaudhary, Village-Girkhi, P.S. Salkhua, District-Saharsa 2 and Anil Chaudhary, S/o Pulkit Chaudhary, Village- Kabirpur, P.S.-Salkhua, District-Saharsa since both the absconders of same districts their trial can be proceeded along with the trial of the present accused persons. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)