IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36363 of 2008 AWADHESH RAI son of Sheo Nath Rai Resident of Mohall Punai Chak, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, District- Patna Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 02.12.2008 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused for the offence under section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and section 47A of the Excise Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence as he has nothing to do with the same. It is further submitted that the allegations levelled in the first information report are factually incorrect. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that in view of the specific allegation against the petitioner of running illegal country made liquor shop and recovery from the said shop, the petitioner is not entitled to be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail. His prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)