IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. W.J.C. No.276 of 2010 RAM SWAROOP MAHTO, son of Late Mangal Mahto, resident of Dargah Road, Behind Terahe Ki Masjid, P.S.-Sultanganj, District-Patna. ---Petitioner Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Inspector General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Patna. 5. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna. 6. The City Superintendent of Police, Patna. 7. The Additional Superintendent of Police, Patna City, Patna. 8. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Patna City, Patna. 9. The Officer-in-Charge, Bahadurpur Police Station, Town and District-Patna. 10. The Officer-in-Charge, Sultanganj Police Station, Town and District-Patna. ----Respondents ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Satish Chandra Mishra & Mr. Md. Nurul Hoda, Advocates For the S t a t e : Mr Ranjan Kumar, A.C. to AAG-9 ----------- 2. 10.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State. The grievance of the petitioner is with respect to the land dispute. Title Suit No.160 of 1996 was filed by the petitioner in the court of the Subordinate Judge I, Patna City for declaration of his title and possession over the land in question. It is submitted that the impugned order of injunction (Annexure 1) was issued against the defendants of the case restraining them from selling and disposing of the suit property. However, the defendants being not the law abiding citizens are - 2 - threatening the petitioner to withdraw the said title suit in order to garb the suit land. It is submitted that the petitioner has informed the police about the aforesaid illegal acts. However, no action is being taken. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the information given by the petitioner through the letters as annexed to the writ application, vide Annexure 2, as also Annexure 3 series, it would appear that there is no specific allegation against particular person giving any sort of threat. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it will be open for the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the concerned Superintendent of Police about the alleged threat, which he is receiving, for taking suitable action in the matter. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)