1 cas1322-10 ttm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1322 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.200 OF 2000 Dnyanu Kalu Chougule since deceased thru his L.Rs Housabai Dnyanu Chougule and Ors. .. Applicants Vs. Anubai Tukaram Chougule and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Dilip Shinde h/f Mr.Sanjay Thokade for the applicants Mr.M.R.Katikan for respondents CORAM: K.K. TATED, J. DATE: 14TH JANUARY, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. This Civil application is preferred by legal heirs of deceased appellant, Dnyanu Kalu Chougule for bringing them on record. 3. The learned counsel for applicants submits that the sole appellant expired on 27.8.04. For want of knowledge it remained on the part of legal heirs of deceased appellant to take appropriate steps for filing the present application. 4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent opposed the 2 cas1322-10 present Civil application on the ground that they failed to disclose sufficient cause for delay. 5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for applicant and averments made in Civil Application, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b), (c) and (d) which reads as under: b) The names of the petitioners may be brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased Appellant Dnyanu Kalu Chougule and the record and proceedings may be amended accordingly. c) The abatement of Second Appeal, if any, may kindly be set aside. d) The delay caused in filing this Civil Application may kindly be condoned. 6. Civil Application disposed of accordingly. (K.K. TATED, J.)