[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO. 504 OF 2007 Rahul Shrawan Paikrao and Ors. ..Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.Rishi Bhatia i/b Subodh Desai for Applicants Mrs.S.V.Thorat for Respondent No.2 Mr.D.P.Adsule A.P.P. for State. ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : FEBRUARY 23, 2007 DATE : FEBRUARY 23, 2007 DATE : FEBRUARY 23, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The applicant-original accused has preferred this application for quashing of F.I.R. being C.R.No.2 of 2007 registered at Vikhroli Police Station. 2. Heard Mr.Bhatia, the learned counsel for the applicant-original accused, Mrs.S.V.Thorat, the learned counsel for respondent no.2-original complainant and Mr.D.P.Adsule, the learned A.P.P. for the State. The complainant is also present in Court. Mr.P.B.Suryawanshi, P.S.I. of Vikhroli [-2-] Police Station is also present in Court. He identified her to be the complainant. I have interviewed the said complainant and she has stated that she does not wish to proceed with the complaint as the parties have amicably settled the dispute. She has also tendered an affidavit which was read over and explained to her and she has admitted her signature thereon. She has stated that she has no grievance against the applicant and she has no objection to quashing of C.R.No.2 of 2007 registered with Vikhroli Police Station. 3. In view of the above, in view of the decision of the Apex Court in in the case of B.S.Joshi and B.S.Joshi and B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of Haryana and another reported another Vs. State of Haryana and another reported another Vs. State of Haryana and another reported in Judgment Today 2003(3) S.C. 277, in Judgment Today 2003(3) S.C. 277, in Judgment Today 2003(3) S.C. 277, C.R. No.4 of 2007 registered at Vikhroli Police Station, is quashed. 4. Application is disposed of. (V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J)