GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3497 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 3497 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 3497 OF 2005 P. Thrimnayaran ...Applicant versus Rajan Malik and anr. ...Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. B.Subramanian with Karim Sk. for the applicant. Shri R.S.Khandeparkar APP for Respdt. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 16TH JUNE, 2005 16TH JUNE, 2005 16TH JUNE, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By this application the applicant seeks quashing of the complaint pending before the Court of learned Magistrate in Bombay. The allegations are that the goods were not received and therefore there is no question of payment being made or dishonour of the cheques. These are the facts which are to be established by cogent evidence. This opportunity can be availed of by the applicant when the proceedings reach the stage of recording evidence under sec. 254 of Cr.P.C. That being the position which vests right on accused to adduce such evidence as he want, I see no reason to interfere. Application is dismissed. ....