COCP No. 906 of 2009 1 In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … COCP No. 906 of 2009 Date of decision: December 3, 2009 Jai Kishan son of Satya Narain ..Petitioner Versus Prof. R.P.Vajpayee and others ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr.R.K.Malik,Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.P.Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Balram Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Ms. Anamika Negi, Advocate for the respondents. ,,, Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.)Oral) An affidavit of Lt. Gen. Dr.D.D.S.Sandhu, Vice Chancellor, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra has been filed wherein it has been submitted as under:- “That after due consideration the following recommendations were made by the Committee in its meeting held on 1.12.2009:- “The Committee has re-examined the case of Shri Jai Kishan, in its totality and it recommends that Shri Jai Kishan may be granted all the benefits of running grade, term of appointment and all the benefits which are admissible to the employes appointed for courses being run under Self- Financing Scheme of the University except pension, as have been granted to Ms. Tripti Chaudhary, Lecturer in English, Ms. Manjinder Gulyani, Lecturer in Law and Shri Ram Mehar Singh Punia, Lecturer in Sociology in the Institute of Law and COCP No. 906 of 2009 2 that he may also be given the benefits of pay fixation including the benefit of regularization of service, except the arrears of pay.” That in accordance with the recommendations of the Committee, the letter No. ET-5/09/16193 dated 2.12.2009 has been issued to Shri Jai Kishan and he has been directed to report for joining to the Director, Institute of Law, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra. A copy of the letter issued to Shri Jai Kishan is enclosed as Annexure -1.” However, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that the aforesaid judgment passed by this court was to be complied with within one month from the date of order i.e., dated 29.9.2008 whereas he has been given the joining on 2.12.2009.. Be that as it may, since the order passed by this court has been complied with, I am not inclined to proceed further in this petition. Rule discharged. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file a representation to the respondents with regard to payment of salary for the aforesaid period . If any such representation is filed within two weeks from today, the same shall be decided in accordance with law. December 3, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE