IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27864 of 2009 SUDHANSHU KUMAR @ SUDHANSU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 05/11/2009 From the impugned order it is apparent that the petitioner himself insisted on disposal of the case without the case diary and the injury report. The allegations are of firing and causing firearm injury. This Court finds no merit in this case to merit interference with the impugned order. The application is rejected. If so advised, the petitioner may renew his prayer for anticipatory bail before the court below within a period of 10 days when the court below shall re-decide the matter on the basis of the materials in the case diary and the injury report, without being prejudiced by the present order. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)