IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 8TH AUGUST 2008 / 17TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 23956 of 2008(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ C.E.CHACKO , PAPPINASSERIL, KARIKODE, MULAKKULAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.P.P.JACOB SRI.T.P.GOPAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. ABRAHAM KARAMMEL PUTHENPURAYIL, MEVELLOOR, KOTTAYAM 2. THE MULAKKULAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH MULAKKULAM ,KOTTAYAM REP. BY ITS SECRETARY 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER PALAI, KOTTAYAM R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. K.R. DEEPA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 23956 OF 2008 B = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 8th day of August 2008 J U D G M E N T The challenge in this writ petition is against Ext. P3 permit and the proceedings to number the building constructed on the strength of Ext. P3. 2. According to the petitioner, on the strength of Ext. P3 the construction has been made, in a land in respect of which the Kerala Land Utilisation Order applies and without obtaining an order thereunder. 3. If as stated by the petitioner, he has a complaint that any such construction has been undertaken, it is always open to the petitioner to approach the statutory authorities and I see no ground for entertaining a writ petition. 4. So long as permit has been granted to him, the 1st respondent is entitled to construct and if he has completed the construction, the Panchayat is also bound to assign building number. This statutory process cannot be stopped since Ext. P3 W.P.(C) No. 23956 OF 2008 -2- building permit remains in force. 5. Therefore, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue the matter before the authority under the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, this writ petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-