WP No. 824/09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 824 OF 20009 Sarfaraj Fattekhan Kayamkhani, R/o. Partur, Dist. Jalna & Ors. ....Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents. Mrs. Geeta Deshpande, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. K.G. Patil, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. P.V. Mandlik, Senior Counsel h/f. Mr. Amol Gandhi, Advocate for respondent No. 3. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & T. V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATED : 17th October, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. Mr. P.V. Mandlik, learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent No. 3 - Partur Municipal Counsel has made a statement that the respondent No. 3 filed additional affidavit in reply stating therein that the arrears of petitioners, difference of amount in respect of time bound promotion scale has been paid to the petitioners. WP No. 824/09 2 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 could get these arrears, but respondent Nos. 4 and 5 have yet to receive. The learned Senior counsel at this stage assures this Court that urgent appropriate steps would be taken to disburse the arrears to petitioner Nos. 4 and 5. On behalf of Municipal Council, it is stated on oath that the pension papers of the petitioners are already forwarded to the office of Accountant General. 4. In case, the Accountant General has received the papers, we expect, appropriate order would be passed on the said proposal in accordance with the record as expeditiously as possible as the petitioners are very old and according to the counsel, are bed ridden. 5. With these observations, the petition stands disposed of. [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] [ NARESH H. PATIL, J.] ssc/