l H lllHHHHllllllllllfl ‘ m ms Hm: gem OF mam mama Aw JABALmmQ use. Pmmmn No. § L? 7 / 1991. / i, V ‘ Pmmamg :— nakhanlal Emmy, s/c Shri late Shri Jagtura aged about 52 yearsr, oocapation—lectarer, in Dan, Rm. §ationa1 Mgher Secondary ' Schcol, BERG. 0L? ) W. , . ." wwws c% (CM? 1. State of M ?. through cummissioner Educat ion nepartmem: 14.9. Egowg. 2. Join€ Dimctor Fublic matruction Durg w Division, m6. 04.9.) 3. Principal 3m: Rm. Ratienal Eigher '_ seacnaary 3¢hool, WIRE. (1L? ) 4. chairman Bistrict Education aociety, c/o nau 3.9. Katianai Higher secondary School, DURG (mm ?E‘1‘EION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF Tw CON$T$$TION 9F wgIA marowpm'rst- i \r¥¥i ] / m: ‘ Xl-HC~78 WW;m, mg? mamw ...)A2;.€;M:..éTfJ.2/?,L,> mam (1am) ”$1200 maimw mméérm ~ " 'mmmmsr ' . WW#WW ; wwmw' ‘ 3mm: - -‘ Smt. Renu Kochar learned tounsel for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Shrivasmva, learned Panel Lawyer, for respondents 1 and 2. Mr. Raja Shanna, Iearned counsei for respondents 3 andv4. Heard. This writ petition has b med under Adidas 2261227 of the Constitution of india for issuan e of directions of this Court to the respondents for payment of sai ry and other benefits of the post of 01I10/1988 and further for due consideration for promotion on he post of Lecturer on regular basis. The petitioner was promoted t the post of Lecturer on 03/0911988 (Annexure-B). 0n perusal of the docu ants l found in Annexure-G that the departmental promotion commit in its meeting held on 27/08/1990 did not confirm promotion of th petitioner in View of the fact that no post was avaiiable. T e petitioner has prayed for oonsideration/approvai of his na e for the post of Lecmrer. Lecturer to the petitioner st Be that as it may, Mr. S arma learned counsei appearing for respondents 3 and 4 submits the petitioners will be paid whatever is‘ due to him as salary on post of Lecturer from the date of et was not approved by the DPC. Learned counsel further sates at the petitioner may be considered promotion tiii the date the pet e n t i' n Xl-HC-7B m$m$ A). 2m @1200 anéwmw ammmm'm . mam (W) "‘ mmwaamtey $1; for promotion,as:-oh' that day to tha post of Lecturer. now retired from service. WW§§QW 'aiwmu The petitioner For the masons stated hove, the respondents p and 4 are directed to make payments o arrears of salary for the period the petitioner had worked as Lectu r irrespective of the fact that Whether he was working on promotion o otherwise. Respondents 3 and 4 are further directed to consider t e case of the petih'oner for revised pension also if the ‘petiu'oner retirement. 1e petition stands aiiowed to the extent .,.indicated above. No order as to SATISH Kt AGNIHOTRI Judge s working as Lecturer on the date of In View of the foregoing, 't :osts. Sdl-