1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7148 OF 2010 (Dattatraya Marutirao Shinde and others vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.B.T.Wagh, Adv., for the petitioners. Mrs. A.V.Gondhalekar, AGP for respondent State. Mr.P.B.Dama, Adv., for R.4. ... CORAM:B.R.GAVAI AND K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE: 21/9/2010 ... 1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable and heard forthwith by consent. 2. By way of present petition, the petitioners have raised a grievance that though they have made an application on 10th Oct.,2008, for payment of rental compensation to respondent nos.2, 3 and 4, the same has not been decided. 3. We dispose of the petition by directing respondent no.3 - 2 Special Land Acquisition Officer, to decide the application of the petitioner within a period of three months from today after giving an opportunity of being heard. It is further directed that, in the event the petitioners are found entitled to rental compensation, the same shall be paid in accordance with law laid down in Bhagwat Nathu Patil V. State of Maharashtra and others ( 2009(1) Bom.C.R.328). Rule made absolute in above terms. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) (B.R.GAVAI) JUDGE JUDGE ... agp/7148-10wp