Writ Petition (SWO. 2858 of 2007 Petitioner Respondents x ‘ Amrit Xalco, S/o. Habil Xaixo, aged about 38 years, working as L.D.T. Government Primary Schooi, Nayadih (Kudeke!a), Bl0ck "Dhara‘mjaigarh, Dist. Raigarh, CG. Versus 1) State of 'C.G. through Secretary g Department of Schoo! Education: : Mantrabya, D.K.S. BhaWan, Raipur,CG. 2) Asst. Commissioner, Raigarh, Dist. Raigarh, CG. 3)’ Commissioner, Raigarh, ist. Raigarh, CG. (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) “ SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Shri Kunai Das, Advocate appearS on behaif of Shri Amit Kumar Sharma, counsel for the petitioner _ Shri V.R. Tiwari; Panel Lawyer for the State ORAL oRoER Passed one“ May, 20o?) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner’as well as for the State/resp§ndents jointiy submit that the fact (and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. / Municipal Corporation, Durg and another { 211306 (ii) MPJR -CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 3-4- 2006. Learned counsel appearing for the re‘spondentsdoes not controvert the said submission. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR D . ( , i In ubsequent cases, i.e, Writ Petition (S) N 5 s . o. 4139 of 200 Gopesh Kumar Verma Vs. The State Govt. \ o ( f hhattisgarh and another and other connecied matters C ) , decided by this Couft on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo d y f ated 28-1-1995, issued b the Secretary, Board o Secondary Education, Bhopal and‘the prospectus of Dipioma in EduCation Examination, it was ciaritied’ that the, omenciature of the Basic Trainin‘institute i.e. B.T.i. ha :n g , , s? been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., Ed. ACcordingiy, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are aiso D covered by the decision in Writ‘Petition (S) No. 4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Vérms Vs. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another (supra). ccordingly, the writ petition is ailoWed in/rterms of the orde A r a th f Yht Bdj V. pssed in‘e case o aswan Kumar harawa s unicipal Corporation, urg and anoter (supra, subjec M D h ) t o Verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner ha t s cquired D.Ed.[Examinatton Certificate on his own expense a s as per the circularsrdated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and urther weter he‘has been aid two advance increments f hh p or not. No ordr as to osts. e c Sd/. satish K.Agnihotri , Judge i' ‘1 Ewt l