(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 286 OF 2005 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 286 OF 2005 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 286 OF 2005 M/s. Moti Decorators & Anr ...Appellants Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others ...Respondents ..... Shri. P.K. Dhakephalkar i/b Mr. K.R. Dhanuka, counsel for the Appellants Shri. A.J. Bhor, counsel for Respondents 1 & 2. Shri. A.Y. Sakhare, Sr. counsel for Respondent No.3 ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 22ND DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 22ND DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 22ND DECEMBER, 2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant, the learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and the learned counsel for Respondent No.3. 2. Mr. Dhakephalkar, the learned counsel for Appellant fairly states that the above appeal is not maintainable in view of Section 100-A of C.P.C., hence, he seeks leave to withdraw the Appeal with liberty to approach the appropriate forum for appropriate relief. In view thereof, Appeal is (-2-) allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such with the aforesaid liberty. 3. Shri. Sakhare, the learned counsel for Respondent No.3 says that the status quo as on today will be maintained with regard to the above matter upto 31.01.2006. 4. Shri. Dhakephalkar, the learned counsel for Appellant states that the Appellant will give at least four days clear prior notice in writing to the Respondents, before moving any forum. ***** (-3-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 328 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 328 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 328 OF 2005 IN IN IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 286 OF 2005 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 286 OF 2005 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 286 OF 2005 M/s. Moti Decorators & Anr ...Applicants Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others ...Respondents ..... Shri. P.K. Dhakephalkar i/b Mr. K.R. Dhanuka, counsel for the Applicants Shri. A.J. Bhor, counsel for Respondents 1 & 2. Shri. A.Y. Sakhare, Sr. counsel for Respondent No.3 ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 22ND DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 22ND DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 22ND DECEMBER, 2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- . In view of dismissal of above Appeal, this Civil Application does not survive and the same is disposed of as infructuous. *****