IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2011 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29036 of 2011(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. THOMAS CHERIYAN, S/O.CHERIYAN, AGED 21, PANATTIL HOUSE, FATHIMAPURAM PO, CHANGANACHERRY - 686 102, NOW STUDYING 5TH SEMESTER, BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY COMPUTER SCIENCE , RAJAGIRI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, KAKKANAD. 2. MOBIN PHILIP MATHEWS, S/O.MATHEWS K. PHILIP, AGED 21, KALLAPURACKAL HOUSE, BRAHMAPURAM, NOW STUDYING 5TH SEMESTER, BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY COMPUTER SCIENCE, RAJAGIRI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, KAKKANAD. 3. TONY KAPPEN, S/O.EMMANUEL THOMAS, AGED 21, KAPPIL HOUSE, KARIMBA PO, PALAKKAD 678 597, NOW STUDYING 5TH SEMESTER, BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY COMPUTER SCIENCE, RAJAGIRI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, KAKKANAD. 4. SACHIN JAMES, S/O.JAMES, AGED 21, ANCHUTHARA HOUSE, POOCHAKKAL PO, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA-688 526, NOW STUDYING 5TH SEMESTER, BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY COMPUTER SCIENCE, RAJAGIRI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, KAKKANAD. 5. SAI SHYAM G, S/O.GIRISH, AGED 21, C3W 186, FEDERAL PARK, VENNALA, ERNAKULAM 682 028, NOW STUDYING 5TH SEMESTER, BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY COMPUTER SCIENCE, RAJAGIRI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, KAKKANAD. 6. VEENA THOMAS, D/O.BENNY BEHANAN, AGED 21, KUNJUVEETTIKUDIYIL,THRIKKAKARA PO, KOCHI-21, NOW STUDYING 5TH SEMESTER, BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY COMPUTER SCIENCE, RAJAGIRI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, KAKKANAD. BY ADVS. SRI.MATHEWS K. PHILIP SMT.T.MANASY ...2/- WP(C).No. 29036 of 2011(D) -2- RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY IT'S REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA PO, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 562. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA PO, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 562. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...3/- WP(C).No. 29036 of 2011(D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE FIRST PETITIONER DATED 14/10/2011 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE SECOND PETITIONER DATED 14/10/2011 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE THIRD PETITIONER DATED 14/10/2011 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE FOURTH PETITIONER DATED 14/10/2011 EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE FIFTH PETITIONER DATED 14/10/2011 EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE SIXTH PETITIONER DATED 14/10/2011 EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE PAYMENT RECEIPT OF THE FIRST PETITIONER DATED 14/10/2011 EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE PAYMENT RECEIPT OF THE SECOND PETITIONER DATED 14/10/2011 EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE PAYMENT RECEIPT OF THE THIRD PETITIONER DATED 14/10/2011 EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE PAYMENT RECEIPT OF THE FOURTH PETITIONER DATED 14/10/2011 EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE PAYMENT RECEIPT OF THE FIFTH PETITIONER DATED 14/10/2011 EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE PAYMENT RECEIPT OF THE SIXTH PETITIONER DATED 14/10/2011 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 29036 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the examination was declared, they had failed in one or two papers. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-