IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1348 of 2009 JAI PRAKASH PRASAD @ JAI PRAKASH SAO son of late Bachha Sao, resident of village Maphi, P.S. Warisaliganj, in the district of Nawada,… … Petitioner/Petitioner Versus MEENA DEVI wife of Jai Prakash Sao, daughter of Kishori Sao, presently residing at Main Road, Nawadah, P.S. Nawadah, in the district of Nawadah… …. Respondent/Opposite Party For the Petitioner: Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate ----------- 2 22.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This Civil Revision is directed against the order dated 05.05.2009 passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Patna in Matrimonial Case No. 102 of 2007, whereby the learned court below has stayed the proceeding of the case. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this civil revision to avail any other remedy, if available under law, as in view of the specific bar as contained in Section 19(5) of the Family Court Act, 1984 as well as a decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Jagdish Pd. Chouhan v. Bhuneshwar Chouhan and anr., reported in 2009(4) BBCJ, 442), holding that civil revision would not be maintainable against an interlocutory order in view of the 2 specific bar under section 19(5) of the Act. In the above view of the matter, the Civil Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)