^^ % ~K ^ tilGHCOURTOFCHHATTiSGARHATBILASPJJR DB/IS1QNB6NCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI JAGDiSH BHALi-A, Ag. CJ. & HON'BLE SHRI SATISH K AGNIHOTRI, J. Petitioners WritPetit!on ILtNo.S5S9of 2007 1. KU.A. Indira, d/o. ShriVenkatRao, aged sbout 35 ysars, 2. Manohar Jethani, S/o. Late Dr. Variys! Das Jethani, aged abQUt 41 years. Both are resident of Ganeshram Nagar Baans-Tall, Amardeep Talkies Road, Raipur (C.G.) Versus 1. State of C.G. Through Seeretary, Urban Development and Administration Department, (Mantralaya) D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur 2. Municipat Commissioner, Municipal CorporationRaipur,Raipur(C.G.) WrjtPetition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india Present: Shri VirendraSharma, CQunsel ferthejseiifioners. SHri Sumesh Bajaj, Government Advocate for the State. Respondents (PassedonT2mNoveniber,2007) ^ The following oral order of the Court was passed by Hon'ble Jagdish Bhalia, Ag. C.J. , A^t^~ . The petitioners have approached this Court as being aggrieved by the fact that there is !ot of encroachment near the petitioners' house and even vendors'are using the area withoutany authority. In this connection, the petitioners have made representations calling upon the IVIunicipal Commissioner, Raipur to remove the bbstructions ih the -2--: . • : -1 ' • .; •- . . '. • ' '• streets. The representations made by the petitioners are contained in Sja.-f-wf'^. AnnexUres P/4 & P/4^) dated 17-10-2006 & 07-08-2007^Nothing has beendonebytheiVlunicjpalAuthorities. interest .of justiee would sufRce ifthetwo representations of the petitioners are considered and disposed of by the Authorities expeditiously. Accordingly, we direct respondent No.2 to dispose.d of the representations of the petitioners expeditiousty, pj-eferably within a penodofonemonthfromthedateofreceiptofacopyofihisorder. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposedof. . __. __ Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice nimmi Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge !^.». ^ .i^i!