IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1113 of 2007 NABI HASSAN S/O LATE ISAHAQ ANSARI ---- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. HUSNABANO W/O NABI HASSAN 3. KULSOOM BANO D/O NABI HASAN -- OPP. PARTIES. ----------- 06 31.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Nobody appears on behalf of the opposite party although notices were validly served. Petitioner assails the order dated 02.04.2007, passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court Bhojpur, Ara whereby on a consideration of the materials placed before him it has been found that the applicants who are the second wife and daughter were entitled to maintenance and accordingly a sum of Rs. 1500/- (one thousand to wife and five hundred to daughter) was directed to be paid. It appears that the husband/petitioner filed his show cause/rejoinder but thereafter absented from the proceeding. Left with the aforesaid situation matter was considered on the strength of the materials placed on behalf of the applicants and it has been held that the applicants were entitled to maintenance. Learned trial Judge has noted that there was no dispute that the opposite party was working in a Jute Mill at Kolkata and drawing a salary of Rs 8000/- (Eight thousand). The second marriage was contracted based on an agreement whereunder he was bound to fully maintain the wife. This Court does not find any patent illegality in the order impugned. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)