Crl. Misc. No.M-17453 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-17453 of 2010 Date of Decision: 13.10.2010 Krishan Malik ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Jitender Dhanda, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, A.A.G., Haryana for the respondent-State. Mr. Gourav Jain, Advocate for the complainant. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.238 dated 27.05.2010 under Sections 420, 447, 448, 452, 455, 467, 468, 471, 472, 323, 327, 506, 120-B IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Hisar. It is stated that the present petitioner got the land from one Naresh. After buying the land from Naresh, it was further sold to one Rajesh Kumar. The present petitioner is the bona fide purchaser for the consideration amount. The complainant is aggrieved on account of the fact that he was in possession of the said land being co-sharer and, therefore, the petitioner tried to forcibly take the possession of the same. Crl. Misc. No.M-17453 of 2010 2 However, in case, the said fact is true, the complainant is always at liberty to seek proper remedy and seek injunction against the present petitioner. Meanwhile, no injury is stated to have been caused to the petitioner in the said incident. Moreover, learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from ASI Ashok Kumar, states that the petitioner has since joined the investigation and is no more required by the police. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the Order dated 28.06.2010 passed by this Court is made absolute. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 13.10.2010 JUDGE gurpreet