IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7815 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.131 OF 1995 Smt.Rukhmini Gangadhar Patil ...Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.S.M.Sabrad for Applicant. Mr.G.P.Mulekar, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DECEMBER 12, 2005. DECEMBER 12, 2005. DECEMBER 12, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. For the explanation offered in the Application, which, to my mind, is sufficient cause and in view of the decision of the Apex Court in Lakshmi Shanker Srivastava vs. State (Delhi Lakshmi Shanker Srivastava vs. State (Delhi Lakshmi Shanker Srivastava vs. State (Delhi Administration) reported in 1979 Cri.L.J.207 Administration) reported in 1979 Cri.L.J.207 Administration) reported in 1979 Cri.L.J.207, : 2 : Application made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.