IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH JULY 2008 / 3RD SRAVANA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 836 of 2008(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.31214/2006 Dated 24/11/2006 .................... PETITIONERS: --------------------------- 1. C.R.JALENDRAN, S/O.C.V.RAGHAVAN AGED 42, CHIGASSERI VEEDU, KAITHARAM, KOTTUVALLI NORTH PARAVUR. 2. C.R.JARITHA, D/O. DO..IN DO...DO.. 3. C.R.JALEELKUMAR,S/O.DO..DO.. IN DO...DO. 4. C.R.JAMINISHKUMAR,S/O. DO..DO..IN DO..DO BY ADV. SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- PUSHKAL, W/O. JAYAPRAKASH,(AGE NOT KNOWN FORMERLY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCITIES, NORTH PARAVUR, NOW WORKING AS DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVES (VIGILANCE) CIVIL STATION,KANNUR. BY SR.GOVT. PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- Cont. Case (C).No.836 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT The judgment dated 24.11.2006 contains a direction to consider Ext.P4. This has been done and communication issued. The further direction that the interest of the writ petitioner shall be protected and matters arising as a result of any sale, if at all, are not matters which could be worked out in a contempt of court case, particularly when the respondent, a statutory authority, has demonstrated that action followed on Ext.P4 and decision taken and communicated. Hence, this contempt case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to take recourse to all other remedies as may be available to take care of the fact situation. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge kkb.25/7.