UNm-IE HIGH COURT OF CHH^FnSGAreH BILASPUflt WRIT PETITION (C) N0. ^^^g OF 2008 w ^a PETITIONER : .« .\^ /Iff ..••-^...- ^" ...-- ^ :^€/ , b(s%""" ^•w /.^" <^.••' ^ RESPONDENTS : Shatrughan Kumar Chaurasia, S/0 late Kaluram Chaurasia, aged about 42 years, Maa Durga Pooja Samagri Dukan, Chhattisgarh Subzi Mandi, Ruabandha Sector, Bhilai, District- Durg,(C.G.) VERSUS (1) The Union Minister of Steel, Government of India, New Delhi. ^-^^fe^ ^y s-¥ry '"^^^$-^ 9fwr^^'r^' fiw^^ (2) The Managing Director, Bhilai Steel Plant (SAIL), Bhilai, District- Durg,(C.G.) - ^ (3)Town Administration Department, Bhilai Steel Plant (SAIL), Bhilai, District- Durg, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA MBiBSS^ Petitioner HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 3578 Shatrughan Kumar Chaurasia y Versus Respondent The Union Minister of Steei & others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'bie Mr. Satish K. Agnlhofrl, J.) Present:- Ms. Indira Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Shri B.D. Guru, Advocate for the respondent No. 2 & 3. ORDERCORAU (Passed on 17th Day ofJune, 2010) 1. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been under possession of a shop for some time thereafter, the petitioner has been displaced and no aiiotment of any other shop has been made. The petitioner has made an application to that effect to the respondent No. 2 & 3 but, no decision has been taken tlli date. 2. Be that as it may, without going into the merit of the case, if a representation is pending consideration or a fresh representation is made to respondent No. 2 & 3, the same may be considered in accordance with law as eariy as possible preferably withjn a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order or from the date of receipt of a fresh representations if so filed. 3. Accordingly, the writ petitlon is disposed of. sd/. SatishK.Agnihotrl Judge Arun