IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9587 of 2010 1. NAGENDRA KUMAR MISHRA, S/O LATE DEO NARAYAN PATHAK, R/O VILLAGE SAHULI,P.O. BAKAR GANJ,DISTRICT- SIWAN. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, H.R.D. DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR,PRIMARY EDUCATION, null HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ,GOVT. OF BIHAR PATNA. 4. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 5. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 6. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,SIWAN. 7. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER,SIWAN. 8. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION OFFICER, SIWAN. ----------- 2 11/02/2011 There is no merit in this writ application because the reasoning given by the District Compassionate Committee seems to be correct. No case for giving any direction for compassionate appointment or interference with the impugned decision is made out when the so called adopting father of the petitioner died in 1989 and the so called adoption deed has been executed in 1990. Even otherwise the death is too far for extending any benefit of compassionate appointment to the petitioner - 2 - after so many decades of the death. This writ application is dismissed as being devoid of merit. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)