L... }( 0ivssio$i Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) wA Nos?.?.&../2005' PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^oflf ^^J^ 'G^te>( s-^'' ^•( Yashwant Kumar Harmukh S/o Late Shri Kanhaiya Lal Harmukh aged about 65 years, R/o Village Kolhiyapuri Post- Pisegaon, Tah & District Durg (Chhattisgarh) 1./ State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department of cooperative, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya District Raipur (C.G.) / c\^ ^^ ^1$^"1" y <^ / ^- A^ ^ Registrar Cooperative Societies State of Chhattisgarh Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3-. Joint Registrar Cooperative Societies State of Chhattisgarh Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 4; Deputy Registrar Vipnan Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh), Durg Sahkari Vipnan Avam Prakriya Samiti Maryadit,Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) /' PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2^6/227"OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR !SSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS TO MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS: - 1. PARTICULARSJlEJCyE_eE i^Mi=t XI-HC-22 3^'^HId^l, ^TTl<l4l<o, ^<rtl<M^< 3ll^i ^5icn .^- ^ i ^,_ I^^L * * V-<></* ;*V*«••«»*»••• WWTT^WTcb lOQ Rl<^<4 3T^T^)T ^J<=b3TI^T 5b^ich;Fi?cf 3T^T?^TTW^f?<T Diviision Bench: Hon'b!e Shri V.K. Shrivastava. 81 Hon'ble Shri Dhirendra ^ishra. j 25JQAS2QQ7 Shri Prateek Sharma, coun^ Shri Prashant Mishra,) State/respondents No. 1 to 4. None for respondent No.5. Hsard. Learned counsei for the pe|1 regarding his prayer that the orc 19/12/2006 by Fuii Bench has no r^ Thls writ petition has been | reiiefs: 'To kindiy Issue the of 2004 dated IOWA Cooperative Act, i^ Aftic!e 14 offfTe Com i^el for the petitioner- Addi. Advocate General for the To kindiy issue a respondents to hand\ Managing Committ^e chainTjanship offfie This Court vide order dated "In the result, the sitltrary nor vtolstlv^ ih&refore, me impi, annulied or dec/a/ed 4)HTd<LnT1 ^l^^lT^'teT^t<Rl<^l< ^3Tf^T3TT^T tttjoner prays to record hls obsen/ation er passed by this Hon'bie. Court on rtrospective eftect, fjjed by the petitioner for the fojlowjng ifofesak^ am^Tdment vide no.22 2005 brought to th®Chhattlsga^ 30 quash as uiira vires to the ^tuti^i of India, ^/rit of mandamus dis'Bcting the |over charge af th@ \sodety to ffie duiy eiected under the Wtioner" 9/12/2006 has held as below: sn^pugned amendment is HBither 1 of Artiate 14 of the Con$titutlon, ^mp^gnQd amendment cannot be \ultra vires, Accordingly, afl the XI-HC-22 3^ ^l^ld^, ^Tn^4l<o, f®t<rtl^y 311^1 ^151 ch qTff^SRTin^ ^ 200 5^^ f^re^' 3TI^T^)T ^i<=h3TT^T 5h^icb^rf?cf 5h^|cb raju 3n^?T^<Trw;Hf??T ^r^ writ pBtltsons are ds^ that the Reglsirar, six months from m accord3/?ce with compietea their terr^ elected bodies into tmjssed- HDi^ever, rf ^ ofdefed Cip-opera^ve Socse^es shall, wsthin hokl eleciions afall the bodies t^w, fufe^ and bye-iaw^ who have and shaii bring aii ^iose fresh ^istence." tod^y, w, in view of this Court's ord^r become infructuous. Accordingly, | the counsel tor petitsoner to r4 Consequently, S.A.Nos. 9272/2C(i disposed of^ Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge <=bi^F<n<{1^ ^i^^T^tel:^'<Ri<^i< ^3:rf^T3TT^T dated 19/12/2006, this petition has W.P.No.5150/2005. as weli as prayer of cord his observation are disnniissed. 05, 372/2007 and 373/2007 stand Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge (^^f^)