IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15729 of 2011 RABINDRA KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and Mrs. Renu Kumari, learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Aurangabad (T) P.S. Case No. 93 of 2007 registered under Sections 467, 468, 470,471,420 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner is that he tried to get recruited as Home guard constable by producing forged certificate. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has not been appointed on the basis of alleged certificates. The other case with similar accusation was lodged against the petitioner in which the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail by this court. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner as this court is not inclined to 2 interfere because the case was instituted in 2007 and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day if possible, considering the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned C.J.M., Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad (T) P.S. Case No. 93 of 2007 at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)