1 jpc/- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 149 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 215 OF 2009 Anil G. Shah .. Petitioner Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others .. Respondents Petitioner in person Ms. S. M. Mondle for Respondent No.1- BMC Ms. Gayatri Singh i/b Vikas Salvi for the Applicant in Ch.S. 149/09 CORAM: J. N. PATEL, & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED: 23rd June, 2009 P. C. 1. Heard. 2. This is an application made by the two applicants for being impleaded as party Respondents- 3 and 4 in the petition. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that these two applicants have been dispossessed from the premises without providing them alternate accommodation as per the scheme of MMRDA. Further the PAP list prepared by the MMRDA in 2005 shows the applicants as eligible for rehabilitation under R & R Policy for the MUIP. 3. It is submitted that the BMC, now known as MCGM has 2 removed the applicants without being authorised to do so and, therefore, the petitioners are adversely affected and they are required to be joined as party Respondents. 4. In our view, if the applicants have statutory or vested rights in the matter, it will be proper for them to file separate Writ Petition as they cannot impose themselves upon the petitioners. The Chamber summons is, therefore, dismissed with liberty to the applicant to file separate Writ Petition to agitate their rights. ( MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (J. N. PATEL, J.)