^^ r^ IN THE fflGH COURT OF CffiIATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Cr.M.P. No. 1 c^ M of2010 PETITIONERS ,.\^. Single Bench 1. Vivekdhar Biwan, S/o Shri Narayandhar Diwan, Aged . about 30 years 2. Smt. Rajkumari, W/o Late Shri Narayandhar Diwan, Aged about 56 Years '...-^p'-' ( Both R/o Village Chandaniyapara, Janjgir, District- ^S$$^^ JanJgir- Champa) -^«0 ••'\r^v''^ &)\?.-- ^p 3. Minakshi, W/o Rajkumar Pandey, Aged about 38 years ^ \/A 4. Rajkumar Pandey, S/o Shri Manharanlal Pandey, Aged lf^/\ \^' about 40 years, ( Both R/o Village Baimanagoi, P.S. Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENT Versus State ofChhatdsgarh, Through Police Station- Janjgir, Tahsil & District Janjgu--Champa(C.G.) __JHgmo ofMiscellaneous PetitmnS/S 482 ofthe Crinunal Procedure Code p ? a\ '^'y"^"^ us-iA-TTTS '/•stys^'SfSV versus Vivekd.faar Diwaa & Others State of Chhattisearh Shri Ashok Dubey, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Vaibhav Goverdhaa, P.L. for tlie State. (17. After arguiug for some tmie counsel for tfae petitioners subiuits tliat ends of iustice would be seived if direction is issued for early disposal of ftie trial whicli is pendiag sitice >0i iy.<£.j;uuo. Counsel for the State has no objection to this proposinon. ^. . Cousidering the facts aad circumstances of the case. the trisl Court is dirccted to decide the trial itself wifhiti a period of six laonths froni fhe next date of hearing of the case. St would tse fhe duty of the petitioner to apprise fhe trial Court about fiie pasging of fhis order. Registty is ajso directed to fonvard the copy of this order to tb.e concemed Court. With the above observation, tbe petition stands disposed of. —- - —— Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge w&• ^s K ^i n ES^