1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10179/2008. Sunil Kumar. VERSUS District & Sessions Judge, Karauli & Another. 06.02.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Rajneesh Gupta for the petitioner. ***** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order passed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this court may call the parties with a view to ascertain whether an amicable settlement is possible. So far as the aforesaid prayer is concerned, it is open for the parties to move the learned trial court in this behalf and with the cooperation of the learned counsel for the parties and that the intervention of the court, if it is possible to arrive at any settlement, the possibilities thereof may be explored before the learned trial court itself as calling the parties before this court would entail unnecessary expenditure. In the facts and circumstances, which have come on record allowing the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, I am satisfied that the impugned order does not call for any interference under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. 2 The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.