IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3311 of 2009 JAGDISH MISHRA S/O LATE PANDIT JAGNNATH MISHRA R/O REKABGANJ, P.O. & P.S.- TEKARI, DISTT.- GAYA ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA, MR. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH. 2. MR. RAJESH KUMAR, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NAGAR PANCHAYAT, TEKARI, DISTT.- GAYA. 3. MR. RAM BILASH CHOUDHARY, OFFICER-IN- CHARGE,PENSION CELL, COMMISSIONER OFFICE, GAYA. 4. MR. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, CONVENOR, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA. ---Opp. Parties ----------- 7. 2.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and opposite party no.2. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite parties no.1 and 2 stating therein to the effect that the grievances of the petitioner have been redressed and, as such, this contempt application need not proceed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that still a sum of Rs.184/- as against the leave encashment and some other claims have remained to be paid. Having considered the fact that the order of this Court has been complied with, this contempt application need not proceed further. However, if any of the aforesaid claims has remained to be paid, the petitioner will be at liberty to ventilate his grievance departmentally by making appropriate representation. The contempt application stands disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)