1 C.W.P. No. 9590 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH --- . 9590 2010 Civil Writ Petition No of : 24, 2010 Date of Decision May Dharam Pal --- Petitioner Versus The Food Corporation of India and others --- . Respondents : CORAM . HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL *** : PRESENT . , Mr Kamal Gupta Advocate . for the petitioner --- , . AJAY KUMAR MITTAL J 226/227 In this petition filed under Articles of the , Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for issuance of , .2 a writ of mandamus directing respondent No to decide the , 2.7.2008 ( -2) appeals preferred by him dated Annexure P 20.9.2009, ( - and supplementary appeal dated Annexures P 3). 2 C.W.P. No. 9590 of 2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that , during the course of employment an enquiry was conducted ; against the petitioner charge sheet was served and a memo . for imposition of major penalty had been served upon him , Thereafter the punishing authority imposed a penalty of token , recovery of rupees one lac upon him vide order dated 13/14.3.2008, -1. Annexure P The petitioner preferred statutory appeal and thereafter a supplementary appeal before .2, respondent No the copies of which are annexed as -2 -3 , Annexure P and P with the writ petition and the same . have not been decided as yet despite service of legal notice He further submits that the petitioner shall feel satisfied if a .2 direction is issued to respondent No to decide the aforesaid - . appeals of the petitioner in a given time frame After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner , and perusing the record the writ petition is disposed of with .2 a direction to respondent No to decide the appeals of the ( -2 -3) , petitioner Annexures P and P in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a . certified copy of this order ( ) AJAY KUMAR MITTAL 24, 2010 May JUDGE *RKMALIK*