IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37974 of 2011 Jitendra Singh @ Motak Singh Versus The State Of Bihar 02. 24.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of informant Mr. Vishwanand Upadhyay, Advocate, vehemently opposes the prayer of bail. It is unfortunate that petitioner’s prayer for bail has been refused, in which bailable offences of I.P.C. are made applicable and F.I.R. is lacking about abuse in name of informant’s caste, if she belongs to Scheduled Caste. It is clear case of non-application of mind by the Trial Court doubting entrustment of liabilities, which is expected from him. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Buxar in connection with Murar P. S. Case No.36 of 2010. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)