IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2661 of 2008 Salamat Ansari, son of Jainul Ansari, resident of village Kharati, P.O. Kuddi, P.S. Chand, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua). …………… Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through Commissioner cum Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna 2.The Director, Primary and Adult Education, Bihar, Patna 3.The District Magistrate, Kaimur (Bhabhua) 4.The District Superintendent of Education cum Sub- Divisional Education Officer, Kaimur (Bhabhua) 5.The Block Development Officer, Durgawati, Kaimur 6.The Block Education Extension Officer, Durgawati, Kaimur 7.The Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Chanwan, District- Kaimur 8.The Panchayat Secretary of the Gram Panchayat, Chhawan, District- Kaimur 9.Mr.Tuffail Ahmad Khan, son of Sri Jamil Ahmad Khan, resident of village+P.O. Kharari, P.S. Durgawati, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua). ………….. Respondents ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr.Rajendra Pd.Singh, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Ramakant Singh,Adv. For the Respondents: A.A.G.-XI. ----------- 3. 29/06/2011 Petitioner has challenged the order of the District Superintendent of Education dated 27.9.2007, as contained in Annexure-1, by which in respect of the concerned Panchayat it has been ordered that the engagement of the petitioner as Urdu Teacher should be cancelled and respondent no.9 should be engaged as Urdu Teacher. He has also challenged the consequential orders issued by the Mukhiya, as contained in Annexure-1/A. In the matter of service conditions of 2 Panchayat Teachers, under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Prarambhik Shikshak (Niyojan Avam Seva Sart) Niyamvali, 2006 (as amended by Amendment Act, 2008), statutory Appellate Forum has been constituted. In the circumstances, this writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file representation/appeal before the concerned Appellate Forum in the matter within four weeks from today. If such a representation/appeal is filed by the petitioner, the Appellate forum shall issue notice to all necessary parties, shall hear them and shall decide the matter with regard to the validity of engagement of the petitioner on its own merits, without being prejudiced by the said order of the District Superintendent of Education and without even taking that into account for any purposes. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)