THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1039 of 2009 ORDER: This revision is directed against the order dated 11.09.2008 passed by the learned Rent Controller-cum-IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, dismissing I.A.No.86 of 2008 in R.C.C.No.37 of 2003 filed by the petitioner seeking to reopen the matter. The petitioner is the tenant and the respondent is the landlord. The respondent filed R.C.C. for eviction of the petitioner. The matter was coming up for arguments. At that stage, the petitioner filed I.A.Nos.86 and 87 of 2008 seeking to reopen the matter for further evidence and to reject the documents filed by the respondent. The Rent Controller dismissed both the I.As. The present revision is filed against dismissal of I.A.No.86 of 2008. The grievance of the petitioner is that he ought to have been given an opportunity to put forth his case. A perusal of the impugned shows that it is a cryptic order without assigning any reasons for dismissal of I.A.No.86 of 2008. Though, it is for the Rent Controller to give opportunity to the petitioner or not in the circumstances of the case, it should assign reasons while passing such orders. In the circumstances, the impugned order is unsustainable and the same is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the impugned order dated 11.09.2008 in I.A.No.86 of 2008 in R.C.C.No.37 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the Rent Controller-cum-IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, is set aside and the matter is remitted to the Rent Controller for fresh disposal assigning reasons, in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks from today. No costs. _______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J 06th August, 2010 Note: Issue CC in two days. (B/o) GHN