1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION Nos. 3846 & 3854 OF 2010. Rameshkumar Mohanlal Kothari and others. -: VERSUS :- Bapurao Bajirao Kohad and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : AUGUST 12, 2010. Heard Shri K.R. Lule, learned Counsel for petitioner. In a suit filed in the year 2005, defendant Nos. 1 to 4 engaged same Counsel, but filed separate written statements. At the stage of cross of plaintiff, they came up with contention that they have changed Advocate and an amendment was necessary. They also wanted to place on record their respective shares specifically. The Trial Court has considered this controversy and found that there were no just and sufficient reasons to move such application at that stage. The Court has observed that the reason given for moving amendment application appear to be false. 2 The stage at which the amendment was sought is not in dispute. The petitioners have not given any cogent and convincing reason for seeking such amendment belatedly. The facts were already within their knowledge. I do not find anything wrong with the use of its discretion by the learned Trial Court. Writ Petitions are therefore, rejected. No costs. However, petitioners /defendants are at liberty to challenge said order, after final adjudication of the Civil Suit, if occasion therefor arise. JUDGE Rgd.