IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 12TH DECEMBER 2011 / 21ST AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31853 of 2011(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SUNIL M.P.,PEADIYEKAL PARAMBIL, EDAKOCHI, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.PREMCHAND SRI.V.TEKCHAND RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), SOUTH RAILWAY STATION ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-16. 2. JNANODAYAM SABHA, REGISTER NO.ER 159/78, EDAKOCHI, KOCHI- 682 006 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. THE SECRETARY, JNANODAYAM SABHA, REGISTER NO.ER 159/78, EDAKOCHI. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SHAH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.31853/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT-P1. TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE INTERNAL AUDIT COMMITTEE. EXHIBIT-P2. TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 14.03.2011 BEFORE THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P3. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 08.08.2011 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P4. TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 03.09.2011 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P5. TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 14.11.2011 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P6. TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 27.02.2009 ISSUED UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 31853 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 12th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T The grievance in this writ petition is mainly regarding the functioning of the 2nd respondent Society. It is seen that complaining of this, petitioner has filed Exts.P4 and P5 before the 1st respondent. In this writ petition, what is mainly alleged is that there is no action on the complaints made. 2. The case was adjourned for the learned Government Pleader to obtain instructions. Accordingly instructions have been obtained and it is submitted that after obtaining the comments of the 3rd respondent, the matter was posted to 7/12/2011 for appearance of the petitioner. 3. Now that the 1st respondent is taking action on the complaints made by the petitioner, at this stage, the only order that is required is that the 1st respondent should conclude such proceedings in accordance with law and with notice to the parties concerned. This the 1st respondent shall do as expeditiously as WPC No.31853/11 :2 : possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits and it is entirely for the 1st respondent to conclude the proceedings. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp