IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19 OF 2008 IN REVIEW PETITION NO. OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 309 OF 2007 RAMCHANDRA M. LOKHANDE ..PETITIONER V/S SMT. AKUBAI LAXMAN LOKHANDE ..RESPONDENTS MR. S.G. DESHMUKH, LEARNED COUNSEL, FOR THE PETITIONER. NONE FOR THE RESPONDENTS. CORAM: J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 5TH JUNE, 2008. DATE : 5TH JUNE, 2008. DATE : 5TH JUNE, 2008. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Review Petitioner who had filed the Second Appeal before this court. He has filed application for condonation of delay in filing Review Petition. Assuming that there are valid reasons for delay, I have perused the grounds taken in the petition as well as the order passed by this court while dismissing the Appeal. Learned counsel contends that grounds no. 5, 6, 7 and 8 in the Memo of Second Appeal clearly raise substantial question of law and this aspect has not been considered by this court while dismissing the Appeal. : 2 : 2. I have carefully gone through the orders and the finding of both the courts below as well as the said grounds No. 5, 6, 7 & 8 which points out that the case is based only on facts and no substantial question of law has been involved. Therefore, I do not find any substance in the Review Petition. 3. The Civil Application for condonation of delay is allowed. However, Review Petition stands dismissed. (J. H. BHATIA, J) (J. H. BHATIA, J) (J. H. BHATIA, J)