IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29135 of 2010 JUDAGIR YADAV S/o Prasadi Yadav, resident of village Chak Abgil, Police Station-Ariari, (Kasar) District Sheikhpura … ………..Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ………….Opposite party. ----------- 3. 12.10.2010 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as also taking into account that the allegation of the prosecutrix of attempting her rape by the petitioner gets sufficient corroboration from the case- diary and that the reliance placed by the learned counsel for the petitioner on paragraph No. 9 of the case diary pertaining to statement of one Raj Kumar Raut admittedly not present in or around the place of occurrence being the house of the prosecutrix but at a distant Chapakal of the School, not good enough to demolish the version of other witnesses recorded in paragraph no. 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11 and 18 of the case diary this Court would find that there are sufficient materials to prima- facie substantiate such serious allegation against the petitioner constituting 2 offence under Sections 376/511 of the Indian Penal Code. That being so, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after completing one year of his further judicial custody from today if his trial itself is not concluded in the aforesaid period of one year. The trial court therefore must make its all sincere efforts to conclude the trial by 10th October 2011. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is rejected. kanchan/- ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)