1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6778 OF 2010 Hanvata S/o Babarao Jadhav .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri N. S. Choudhari, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. K. Kadam, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1. Shri S. T. Shelke, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM : P. V. HARDAS AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 29TH JULY, 2010. PER COURT : . This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India takes exception to the rejection of the nomination form of the petitioner for the elections of village panchayat of village Kanka, Tq. and Dist. Hingoli. The petitioner who claims to be belonging to "Wadar" caste which is recognized as 'Vimukt Jati' submitted his nomination form from Ward No. 3. The petitioner inadvertently instead of writing the serial number of his name in 2 the voters list, wrote the house number. The nomination form of the petitioner, therefore, came to be rejected on 17.07.2010. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has very candidly admitted that the polling is scheduled tomorrow i. e. on 30.07.2010 and the counting is scheduled on 31st July, 2010. Mr. Shelke, learned counsel for the respondents points out that the ballate papers have already been printed and any interference at this stage is likely to delay the holding of the elections. 3. In that light of the matter, therefore, according to us, the petitioner has remedy available to him in law. We therefore, refrain from expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. The writ petition is thus without merit is summarily dismissed with no order as to costs. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ P. V. HARDAS, J.] bsb/July 10