c 1. c L HSGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILA^PUR DIVISiON BENCH CORASVJ: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI T.P. SHARIVSA. J. APPELLANT: (AppSicant) RESPONDENTS (Non appllcants) M.A. No. 916/2004 Bodhanlat @ Bodhram, aged 37 yrs., s/o Somnath Satnami, r/o village Singarbhatta, p.o. Kendra, P.S. and sub-tahsil, Abhanpur, dist. Raipur, C.G. (Injured-Cfaimant) Versus 1. Manoj, aged 28 yrs., Pataluram Satnami, r/o Singarbhatta, tahsi! Abhanpur, dist. Raipur, C.G. (Driver) 2(i) Smt. Sulochana devi, aged 47 yrs., wd/o Tejram Verma. (ii) Ashwani Kumar, aged 20 yrs., s/o Tejram Verma. (lil) Miss Pratibha, aged 18 yrs., d/o Tejram Verma. (iv) Abhinesh Kumar, aged 16 yrs., s/o Tejram Verma. (owners) Respondent no. 2 (iv) is stiil minor and therefore sued through his mother and natura! guardian respondent no. 2 (i). Ali are r/o viltage Singarbhatta, Tahsil and P.S. Abhanpur, dist. Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Orienta! Insurance Co. Ltd., Pachpedi Naka, Dhamtari Road; Raipur, C.G. (Insurer) APPEAL UNDER SECTiON 173 OF THE IVIOTOR VEHICLES ACT. 1988 Present: None for the appeliant. ^ nimm{ ORDER ith (8tn December, 2008) The foliowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellant. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the appeilant, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the appeai for want of prosecution. 3. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge L-