1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1331 OF 2010. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, through the General Manager, BEST. ..Petitioner. v/s. The General Secretary, BEST Workers Union & Anr. ..Respondents. .... Ms. Kavita Anchan, i/b. M.V. Kini & Co., for Petitioner. Mr. M.D. Nagle, for Respondents. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 31STH AUGUST 2010. P.C. The learned Advocate appearing for the parties have tendered the consent terms dated 30th August 2010. They have submitted that the consent terms be taken on record and the Writ Petition be disposed of in terms of the consent terms. 2. The consent terms are taken on record and marked 'X’ for identification. The consent terms are signed by the Assistant Personnel Officer of the Petitioner and by the Respondents. The consent terms are also signed by the learned Advocates for the Petitioner as well as the Respondents. 3. The Respondent No.2 is present in the Court. He has informed the Court that the contents of the consent terms have 2 been interpreted and explained to him in Marathi by his Advocate and he has understood the same and there is no force, fraud or coercion involved. 4. Writ Petition is accordingly, disposed of in terms of the consent terms marked 'X'. 5. Office is directed to number the Writ Petition. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]