IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4897 of 2010 ALI SAH Versus ALAMGIR SAH ----------- 3 16.03.2011 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. This application has been filed for restoration of the Civil Revision No. 579 of 2008 which stood dismissed by reason of non compliance of the order dated 21.7.2010. By the said order a permission was granted to convert the civil revision into writ application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India subject to the fulfillment of the other conditions. The office reports that the order was complied partly. It is mentioned in the office report that by reason of non- compliance of the requirements of filing the synopsis, the cause title, second copy of the brief and Court fees within the stipulated period, the application stood dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the defects so mentioned, have also since been removed by the petitioner and that he has filed the synopsis, the cause 2 title and the second copy of the brief as back as on 22nd December 2010 and even the requisite Court fee has been filed on 4.3.2011. Regard being had to the statements made in the application and the submissions of learned counsel, this application is allowed, the peremptory period for compliance of the directions is extended upto 04.03.2011 and the Civil Revision No. 579 of 2008 is restored to its original file. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J.)