..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1052 OF 2008 Atul Maruti Ghare. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.M.B.Zanwar, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 24th July, 2008. DATED : 24th July, 2008. DATED : 24th July, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.104 of 2006 of Wadgaon Maval Police Station. The said case is mainly under Section 302 of IPC. 3. The learned APP has stated that the trial has commenced and 12 witnesses have already been examined. He has submitted that only few witnesses were remained to be examined. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant, at this stage. 4. Application for bail is rejected. ..(2).. 5. However, liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for bail in case the trial is not concluded by 10th October, 2008. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)