IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2010 / 12TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 16990 of 2010(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- THRESSIA, W/O. JACOB, AGED 57 YEARS, RESDING AT VADAKOODAN HOUSE, MINALUR.P.O, MULAMKUNNATHUKAVU, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.JAMALUDHEEN SMT.LATHA PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, THRISSUR. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MINALUR VILLAGE OFFICE, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, PERINGANDOOR, THRISSUR. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 16990 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 2nd day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext.P12 order of the District Collector passed under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy and Wet Land Act, 2008. Against that order, the petitioner has got an effective alternate remedy by way of revision before the Government under Section 28 of the Act. Therefore, I am not inclined to exercise my discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to entertain this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file a revision against Ext.P12 under Section 28 of the Act. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge