IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M. No. 6504 of 2009 and CWP No. 17644 of 2006 (O&M) Date of decision: 30.04.2009 M/s Shila International, D-19, Focal Point, Bye Pass Jalandhar through its Partner/Prop. Tarlochan Singh s/o Shri Jai Singh .....PETITIONER VERSUS Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Jalandhar and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present: Mr. N.K.Suneja, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner. Ms. Monica Chibbar Sharma, AAG, Punjab, for respondents No. 1 to 3 and 5. Ms. Tanu Bedi, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL) C.M. No. 6504 of 2009 Notice of the application. Ms. Tanu Bedi, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 4 and states that she has no objection to the restoration of the case. For the reasons mentioned in the said application, the same is allowed. The case is restored to its original number. C.M. No. 6504 of 2009 and CWP No. 17644 of 2006 (O&M) -2- CWP No. 17644 of 2006 Counsel for the petitioner states that since there is a compromise between the petitioner and respondent No. 4-workman, he does not intend to press the said writ petition as the same has been rendered infructuous. Counsel for respondent No. 4-workman states that she does not have any instructions about the compromise, which has been effected between the parties. In view of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) JUDGE April 30, 2009 pj