WP(C) 2383/2008 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA The petitioner is aggrieved by the Annexure-6 and 7 notices date d 06.05.2008 and 19.05.2008 issued by the Executive Officer, Pathsala Town Commi ttee and I.F.&C.S.&C.A, Pathsala, asking him to stop the poultry firm in the nam e and style of M/s Lahkar Brothers. By the said two notices, the petitioner was directed to stop the firm under threat of legal action. While entertaining the writ petition, vide order dated 13.06.200 8, the learned standing counsel, Pollution Control Board submitted that the peti tioner had prayed for granting consent to the Pollution Control Board by submitt ing the necessary fees for running the poultry feed godown. He also submitted th at the godown was inspected by the Pollution Control Board Officials and nothing adverse was found. Noticing the said stand of the Pollution Control Board, an i nterim order was passed, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to ru n the firm M/s Lahkar Brothers, subject to the condition that they would continu e to maintain the godown in good, clean and hygienic condition. The respondents have not filed any counter affidavit, but have p roduced some documents indicating that there was complaint against running of th e godown by the petitioner in an unhygienic condition. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the said interim order dated 13.06.2008. It is hereby provided that if the pe titioner does not maintain the godown in hygienic, clean and good condition, the authority would be entitled to take action upon notice to the petitioner and in accordance with law.