arbp298-11 vai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.298 OF 2011 Royal Palms (India) Pvt. Ltd. ....Petitioner V/s. TATA AIG General Insurance Agent Ltd. ....Respondent Mr.Jaideep Mitra i/b Mr.Munir Merchant for the Petitioner. Mr.Rajan Tripathi i/b Mr.A.S. Vidyarthi for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 7TH JUNE, 2011. P.C. :- 1. This application under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is misconceived. According to the petitioner, the respondent has admitted an amount of Rs.5,18,02,404/-.The petitioner therefore, seeks an order directing the respondent to deposit the amount with permission to the petitioner to withdraw the same. 2. If in fact, the respondent has admitted any amount, it is always open to the petitioner to make an appropriate application before the arbitrator for the same. There is no case for any interim reliefs in respect of the said amount. The petition is therefore, dismissed. 3. In this view of the matter, I rejected the respondent’s application for time to file an affidavit in reply, which I would otherwise have granted.