Crl.Misc. No.M-21392 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: July 29, 2011. Crl.Misc. No.M-21392 of 2011 . Survesh Devi .. Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana. .. Respondent * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI * * * PRESENT Mr.Yogesh Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Sushma Chopra, Addl. A.G., Haryana. * * * M.M.S.BEDI, J (ORAL). The petitioner is mother-in-law of Anita who died an unnatural death within 7 years of marriage and was allegedly treated with cruelty on account of demand of dowry. There are allegations that from the very beginning, all the family members of husband of Anita, had been demanding Car. The petitioner claims that she is residing separately along with her husband and one son and that now she has to look after two children born out of wedlock of his other son whose wife Anita has died an unnatural death by burning. . . . 1 Crl.Misc. No.M-21392 of 2011 After going into the facts and circumstances of this case and the police file, it appears that investigation has not yet been completed. The statutory presumptions under Section 113-A & 113-B of the Evidence Act, points toward the prima facie guilt of the petitioner. Whether the petitioner has got sufficient material available with her to rebut the legal presumption, cannot be appreciated at this stage. No extra ordinary exceptional circumstances exist for the grant of pre-arrest bail. So far as the plea that the petitioner has to look after two children of the deceased is concerned, the said plea may constitute a good ground for the grant of regular bail. Dismissed. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE July 29, 2011. rka . . . 2