IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI TUESDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 29681 of 2008(H) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ ANILKUMAR .S., ANUPAM, TKMC P.O., KOTTARAKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KILIKOLLUR 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, CHOLAMANDALAM DBS PRIVATE LIMITED, KURUMBERIL AVENUE, POLAYATHODE, KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL FOR R1 & R2 ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE FOR R3 SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO. 29681/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE RC BOOK OF THE VEHICLE KL-2 U 2151. P2:- COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. P3:- COPY OF THE TIMINGS ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. P4:- COPY OF THE RECEIPTS SHOWING THE PAYMENTS. P5:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT. 20.9.08. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE tss K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ========================================= W.P.(C).No.29681 of 2008 - H =============================== Dated this the 4th day of November, 2008. J U D G M E N T BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J The petitioner is the registered owner of a stage carriage bearing registration number KL-2 U 2151. The said vehicle has been purchased availing a loan from the 3rd respondent. The petitioner submits, on the basis of default of two instalments, the 3rd respondent is sending musclemen to threaten him and seize the vehicle. Therefore, he is not in a position to ply the vehicle. Therefore Ext.P5 representation was filed before the police seeking protection and thereafter this writ petition is filed seeking appropriate reliefs, alleging that the police did not take any steps to protect him. 2. The 3rd respondent submitted that all the allegations against him are unfounded. This writ petition is filed only to harass him. He did not engage any musclemen to seize the vehicle. The 3rd respondent also submitted that if at all the vehicle is to be seized, same will be done only through the process of court. In view of the above submission, we feel that W.P.(C).No.29681 of 2008 - H 2 no orders are necessary in this writ petition. Accordingly, it is disposed of. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE. bkn/-