^-' HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR SingIeBench: Hon'bie Shri Diiip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. CiviiRevisioiTNo.^193of2008 Applicaht (Defendant No.1 S (Defendant No.2) Bhardwaj Singh, S/o Shri Ramjatan Singh, aged about 33 years, Thana Prabhari, Thana Bagichajahsii Bagicha, District Jashpur (CG) at present R/o Viliage Devipur, Post- Surajpur, District-Surguja (CG) Versus Dilbar Baba, S/o Late Gahnuram, aged about 48 years, Caste-Korwa, Occupation-Samajsewl Karyakarta & President, Dilbar Baba Ashram, Village Chhichhli (Rauni), Thana Bagicah, Distt. Jashpur (CG) State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Collector, Distriet Jashpur (CG) Civil reviSion under Seetion 115 ofthe CPC. 190i Preseni: Shri Arun Shukia, counsel forthe petitioner. ORALORDER (Passedon21.01.2009) Heard on admission. (2) The petitioner is aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 19.11.2008 passed by the District Judge, Jashpur in civil appeal No.1-8/2008 affirming the judgment and decree dated 29.03.; passed by the Civil Judge, Class-II.Bagicha, District Jashpur in civil suit No.04-B/2008, whereby compensation of Rs.11,000/- was awarded to the respondent No.l/plaintiff for defamation caused by the petitioner herein by uttering perse defamatory words on 03.06.2005. (3) There is a concurrent finding recorded by both ttie Coyrts below that the.words uttered bythe petitioner herein on 03.06.2005 wereper se defamatory. The' only ground urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the intention to defame the respondent Np.l/piaintiff is Cor^ " :'\ not borne out. However.in myconsidered opinion.the intention can be gathered Sythe defamatory words uttered by the petitioner. Priya illegality much less any manifest error of law is seen in the impugned judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Jashpur. Revision being without any substance is dismissed at the stage of admission. Sd/- Judge ukh -^S Sit<ri^-. .:t B K ^-