IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 31ST OCTOBER 2011 / 9TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28889 of 2011(I) -------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. MOHANAKRISHNAN.P, 21 YEARS, S/O.SASIDHARAN.P, PALLATH HOUSE, KANDESWARAM, IRINJALAKUDAM.P.O, TRICHUR. 2. MARIYA DAVIS, AGED 22 YEARS, D/O. DAVIS, PUNNELIPARAMBIL HOUSE, THAZHEKKAD POST, KOMBIDIJAMAKKAL, TRICHUR. 3. MARIA BABU, AGED 22 YEARS, D/O. BABU, PALLATHY HOUSE, KARUKUTTY POST, ANGAMALY. BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DIST., R1 & R2 BY SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/10/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.28889/2011-I: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXHIBIT-P1- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 03/10/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE FIRST PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P2- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 03/10/11 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P3- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 03/10/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).28889/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 31st day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of the answer scripts of the 6th semester B.Tech Computer Science Examination vide Exts.P1 to P3 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the first respondent to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the first respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs