IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 6TH AUGUST 2010 / 15TH SRAVANA 1932 RP.No. 733 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.20489/2010 Dated 02/07/2010 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE WPC: -------------------------------------------- MAYA RAJAN, W/O.RAJENDRA KURUP, CHARINJAYYATHU PUTHEN VEEDU, AMBALATHUMBHAGOM, PORUVAZHY VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT IN WRIT PETITION: -------------------------------------------- 1. VISWANATHAN THAMPY, S/O.KRISHNAKURUP, ANAVATTUKIZHAKKATHIL, AMBALATHUMBHAGOM, PORUVAZHY VILLAGE, SASTHAMCOTTAH, KOLLAM-690 520. 2. SYAMALA AMMA, ANAVATTUKIZHAKKATHIL, AMBALATHUMBHAGOM, PORUVAZHY VILLAGE, SASTHAMCOTTAH, KOLLAM-690 520. 3. RAJENDRA KURUP, CHARINJAYYATHU PUTHEN VEEDU, AMBALATHUMBHAGOM, PORUVAZHY VILLAGE, SASTHAMCOTTAH, KOLLAM-690 520. 4. KARTHYAYANI AMMA, W/O.LATE KOCHU RAMAN PILLAI, AIKKARA KIZHAKKATHIL, KRISHNA NIVAS, NELLIPUZHA, MUTHUPILAKKADU PO, PORUVAZHY VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-690 520(DIED) 5. KUNJUKRISHNA PILLAI, S/O LATE KOCHU RAMAN PILLAI,AIKKARA KIZHAKKATHIL, AMBALATHUMBHAGOM, PORUVAZHY VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-690 520 6. SUBHADRA AMMA, D/O. LATE KOCHU RAMAN PILLAI,AIKKARA KIZHAKKATHIL, AMBALATHUMBHAGOM, PORUVAZHY VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-690 520. 7. SIVAN PILLAI, S/O. LATE KOCHU RAMAN PILLAI, NELLIPUZHA, MUTHUPILAKKADU PO, PORUVAZHY VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-690 520. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------- R.P.No.733 of 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this 06th day of August, 2010 ORDER Petitioner seeks review of judgment dated 02-07-2010 in W.P.C.No.20489 of 2010. That writ petition was in challenge of Exts.P2, P4 and P6, orders referred to therein. After arguing the matter for some time learned counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly permission was granted and writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. Grievance of petitioner is that judgment dated 02-07-2010 would stand in the way of petitioner challenging the appealable orders involved in the writ petition. I make it clear that judgment dated 02-07-2010 would not stand in the way of petitioner challenging such orders as provided under law if he is otherwise entitled to that court. With the above observation this review petition is closed. (THOMAS P JOSEPH, JUDGE) Sbna/-