IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.2564 OF 2009 Between: Raya Venkata Reddy …Petitioner A n d Jetteboina Ramulamma and 4 others ..Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.2564 OF 2009 ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 20-04-2009 in C.M.A.No.3 of 2008, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Kandukur, wherein the said appeal filed by the petitioner herein, the plaintiff, was dismissed confirming the order dated 30-04-2008 in I.A.No.184 of 2008 in O.S.No.42 of 2008, on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Kanigiri, wherein the said application filed by the petitioner herein for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, was dismissed. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the respondents. Perused the record. 3. The petitioner herein filed the suit for permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with his possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property. Along with the suit, he filed I.A.No.184 of 2008 for temporary injunction. Initially, ad interim injunction was granted in his favour and subsequently after due enquiry, the said I.A.No.184 of 2008 was dismissed and ex parte interim injunction was vacated. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed C.M.A.No.3 of 2008 and the learned Senior Civil Judge, by the impugned order, dismissed the said appeal also. Thus, as the matter stand, there is no temporary injunction in force in favour of the petitioner/plaintiff. As the suit is filed in the year 2008 and there is no temporary injunction in force, at this stage, it is considered imprudent to go into merits of the case. Instead the suit itself can be directed to be disposed of. The learned Junior Civil Judge, Kanigiri is, therefore, directed to dispose of the suit at an early date preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. In the result, the civil revision petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 13th June, 2011 Lrkm.