IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2010 / 13TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 3353 of 2010(T) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SREERAJ P NAIR AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.K.N PURUSHOTHAMAN NAIR, MANIKKYAKUNNEL HOUSE, KAVUNGAL,EDAYARANMULA, PATHANAMTHITTA- 689 532. BY ADV.MR.K.A.MANZOOR ALI. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (CUSAT), REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS,THRIKKAKKARA P.O,KOCHI-22. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS,THRIKKAKKARA P.O,KOCHI-22. R1 & R2 BY MR. S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI,SC,COCHIN UTY., THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/02/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JP, T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.3353 OF 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner was a student for B.Tech Information Technology of College of Engineering, Kallooppara. The petitioner completed his studies for the academic year 2005-2009 and he passed all papers except Fundamentals of Engineering-II in semesters I & II. The petitioner appeared for the supplementary examination of the said paper in June 2009 and when the results were published, he failed in the said paper for 9 marks. The copy of the mark list is produced as Exhibit P1. The petitioner applied for revaluation by remitting the prescribed fee on 21.01.2010. Exhibit P2 is the chalan receipt evidencing the payment of revaluation fee. 2. The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the respondent University to complete the revaluation of the paper applied by the petitioner. It is submitted by the petitioner that he has got a job assignment from WIPRO Solutions, W.P.(C) No.3353/2010 2 Bangalore and unless the revaluation is completed earlier, that may cause difficulty and hardship to the petitioner. 3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the University. It is submitted that sufficient time will be required to complete the process of revaluation. In the light of the urgency shown by the petitioner, there will be a direction to the University to complete the revaluation and communicate the results thereon to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp