IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.115 of 2011 CHUNCHUN YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. It appears from perusal of first information report that marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with the deceased in the year, 2003 and after marriage, the deceased gave birth to two children. Subsequently, the deceased fled away from her matrimonial home and after that a Panchayati was held and again, the deceased started residing at her matrimonial home. Furthermore, it would appear from the record that on 02.05.2010, the family members of the petitioner informed the informant about missing of the deceased and on 03.05.2010, the dead body of the deceased was found in a field. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that even if the story assumed to be true, then also there is nothing in the entire case diary to show this fact that the deceased was abetted by the petitioner to commit suicide. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Chunchun Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with - 2 - Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 39 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)