IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29145 of 2010 RAUSHAN JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 03.11.10. In pursuance to the order dated 10.08.2010, both the petitioner and opposite party no.2 are in appearance. The petitioner is ready to take the opposite party no.2 to his place of job at Ahmadabad but opposite party no.2 is still apprehensive to the petitioner. The petitioner i.e., the husband is willing to pay Rs. 800/-(Eight hundred) per month to opposite party no.2. The aforesaid amount will be deposited in the account of opposite party no.2 in first week of every month from November, 2010. The opposite party no. 2 will supply the account number to the petitioner within a period of one week from today. The aforesaid payment by the petitioner will be subject to any order being passed in the maintenance or matrimonial proceedings. In view of the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner above named be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with 2 C.R. No. 816 of 2008, T.R. No. 254 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, Samastipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. The aforesaid order in no way will preclude the parties to resume the conjugal life as and when they desire. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)