D.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.55/2009 DATE OF ORDER : 29.04.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KAPADIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEO NARAYAN THANVI Mr. R.S. Choudhary, for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Sharma, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order as well as the evidence recorded during trial. Having appreciated the contradictions and omissions in the statements of the witnesses particularly of Maina, Deepa Ram and Mangi Lal, the learned trial court has rightly come to the conclusion that no case is made out against Gopal Ram, who is the brother-in-law and Pema Ram, who is the father-in-law. In a case of acquittal, when the trial court has appreciated the evidence on the basis of contradictions and omissions, the appellate court should be very slow to disagree with the finding, unless it is perverse. While exercising its revisional jurisdiction, this court, on the basis of the statements given in the examination-in-chief, cannot entertain this revision petition. Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed summarily. (DEO NARAYAN THANVI), J. (A.M. KAPADIA), J. ms rathore