IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2009 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 7389 of 2009(P) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MOLLY, AGED 35, WIFE OF TITUS, KARUMALI PARAMBU, EDAPALLY SOUTH VILLAGE, VENNALA PRESENT ADDRESS: REVATHY LADY STORES, 32/2461-A, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI-25. BY ADV. SRI.PRAVEEN K.JOY,SC,COCHIN CORPORATION SRI.S.MURALI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF COCHIN, ERNAKULAM. 2. DALIA MAHESH, AGED 36, MITHILA, ALINCHODE, VENNALA P.O., PIN-682028. 3. P.V.AMMU, D/O VELAYUDHAN, AGED 73, EDAPALLY THEKKUMBAGHAM VILLAGE, VENNALAKARA, RESIDING AT KARUMALI PARAMBIL, BROTHERS VILLA, PALARIVATTOM P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT ADV. SMT.K.V.RESHMI FOR R2,3 SHRI.PRAVEEN JOY, SC FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.7389 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 24th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T A dispute has arisen between the petitioner on the one hand and respondents 2 and 3 on the other, in respect of transfer of ownership in respect of a building. Objections have been filed and the matter is pending before the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “a) Issue a writ in nature of Mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 1st respondent to amend and correct Ext.P3 tax receipt of building No.32/2461-B4 in view of the rights of the petitioner vide Ext.P1 title deed and Ext.P2 property tax receipt in favour of the petitioner for building No.32/2461-A. b) Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 1st respondent to take further action (sic) Ext.P4 and Ext.P5 representation within a fixed time frame.” 2. The learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation submits that a decision in the matter would be taken after considering the objections and hearing all parties concerned. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to take a final decision on the objections raised by the petitioner in the matter of transfer of ownership of the property in question after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as respondents 2 and 3, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2