1 SUIT-2816-02.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.2816 OF 2002 Raj Kumar Dhoot and ors. ..Plaintiffs Vs Vasudev Navani and ors. ..Defendants -- Ms.Neeta Rajda with Ms.Dipti Rajda i/b.M/s.DSR Associates, for the plaintiffs. Mr.Darshan Mehta i/b.M/s.Dhruve, Liladhar & Co., for defendants. Mr.S.M.Hegde, Finance Controller of plaintiff nos.3 to 6 is present. Mr.Vasudev Navani, Defendant no.1 and Director of defendant nos.3 and 4 is present. Plaintiff nos.1 and 2 and Defendant nos.2 and 5 are present. -- CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 15 th JULY, 2011 P.C: Not on board. Mentioned. 2] The learned counsel appearing for the parties state that the controversy has been amicably settled between the parties in terms 2 SUIT-2816-02.odt of the consent terms. The learned counsel appearing for the parties have tendered consent terms duly signed by the plaintiffs and their advocate as also by defendant nos.1 to 5 and their advocates. Mr.S.M.Hegde, Finance Controller of plaintiff nos.3 to 6 is present in the Court on behalf of the plaintiffs and Mr.Vasudev Navani, Defendant no.1 and Director of defendant nos.3 and 4 is present in the Court on behalf of the defendants in the Court. 3] I have perused the consent terms and I am satisfied that the controversy between the parties is lawfully settled in terms of the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. The undertaking given by the defendants in paragraph 4, 5 and 6 are accepted. Suit stands disposed of in terms of the consent terms. Decree shall be drawn in terms of the consent terms. [R.G.KETKAR, J.]