IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5958 of 2011 PARMESHWAR UPADHAYA @ SUSHIL KUMAR UPADHAYA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 23.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail in a case registered under Sections 302, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that on 25.03.2007, the son of the informant went missing subsequently, on 01.04.2007 a sanha was lodged by the informant in which the petitioner was not named but subsequently, the informant came to know that with accusation of enticing away the wife of the deceased, the deceased lodged a case against this petitioner, hence the suspicion was raised and the F.I.R. was lodged on 12.06.2007. The report of the I.O. suggests that the victim was alive even till May-June, 2007. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the case, which was lodged by the deceased against the petitioner earlier, in that the accusation was found false and final form was 2 submitted. Considering the suspicious nature of accusation and the delayed lodging of the F.I.R., let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 319 of 2007. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)