IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 17TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 26TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 28770 of 2010(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- 1. NIDHIN M., S/O. MOHANKUMAR N.K., AGED 22 YEARS, NADUVILAYIL HOUSE, KURICHY P.O., KOTTAYAM. 2. JOSH EAPPEN JACOB POOVANVELIL, S/O. JACOB POOVANELIL, AGED 22 YEARS, VARTHRAPALLATHU POOVANVELIL, KARIPUZHA P.O., MAVELIKKARA. 3. GIBY KURIEN, S/O. P.C.KURIEN, AGED 22 YEARS, PUTHENPARAMBIL, CHUMATHRA P.O., THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA. 4. NIKHIL NAIR, S/O. G.K.NAIR, AGED 22 YRS, SREEVIHAR, PUTHENANGADY, THIRUNAKKARA, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW SRI.SATHISH NINAN SRI.ARUN THOMAS SRI.JENNIS STEPHEN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686 560, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686 560. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 28770 OF 2010 (U) ===================== Dated this the 17th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 8th Semester examination was declared, 1st petitioner failed in Electrical System Design, 2nd petitioner failed in Automobile Engineering and Elective II-Silicates, the 3rd petitioner failed in Elective II-Silicates and the 4th petitioner failed in Automobile Engineering and Project Management. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp