1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7453 OF 2010 Kisan Pratishthan, Beed, through its President ..PETITIONER VERSUS The Union of India & ors. ..RESPONDENTS Mr B.N. Patil, Advocate holding for Mr R.N. Kolekar for the petitioner; Mr S.S. Bora, Advocate for respondents no.2 & 3 CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 19th April 2011 PER COURT The petition has been preferred against the decision of the respondents to reject the proposal submitted by the petitioner to open a D.Ed. college. It appears that the petitioner had only submitted a "lease deed certificate" with the proposal. However, later a registered sale deed was produced before the respondents. The learned Counsel for respondents no.2 & 3 was directed to take instructions as to whether the proposal submitted by the petitioner could be reconsidered. 2. Mr Bora appearing for respondents no.2 & 3 submits that in case the petitioner submits a proposal together with the sale deed and requisite particulars, it will be considered in accordance with law by 2 respondents no.2 & 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh proposal for starting a D.Ed. college. ( S.S. SHINDE, J. ) ( SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. ) amj/wp7453.10