THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 2258 of 2007 Oral order: Aggrieved by the action of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in not taking action for removal of the unauthorized constructions made by respondent No.3 in the property in question, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. Even though the writ petition was filed two years back, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have not filed counter. However, today when the matter is taken up, the learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 produced copy of notice dated 06.09.2009 issued by the Corporation to respondent No.3 under Section 452 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955, calling upon him to show cause as to why the illegal/unauthorized constructions made by him, shall not be demolished. Since the Corporation has initiated action against respondent No.3 for removal of the alleged illegal/unauthorized constructions made by him, no further orders need be passed in the writ petition, and the same is accordingly closed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 15th October, 2009 KSR