IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 87 of 2008 Between: Smt. M. Rajeswari, W/o. P. Ekambaram, III JUnior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, General Administration Department (Accom.), A.P. Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Secretary (Accom) Government of Andhra Pradesh, General Administration Department, A.P. secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 3 The Estate Officer, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ or Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writof Mandamus, directing the respondents to allot a 2 Rt Government Quarter at Malakpet as per the order dated 08-11-2007 by declarng the action of the respondents in imposing penal rent on the petititioner by their orders Dated 27-12-2007 and 10-12-2007 for temporary stay in the present 3 Rt Quarter till the allotment of a 2 RT Quarter is arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14, of the Constitution of India and Rule 4(9) of the Allotment of Government Quarters Rules, and unjust and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.LAKSHMANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 87 of 2008 Order: Even though the petitioner questioned the orders dated 10.12.2007 and 27.12.2007, whereunder respondent No.1 directed respondent No.3 to collect penal rent from the petitioner on the ground that she is not entitled for 3RT Quarter, however, when the writ petition was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Pleader for GAD submitted that since the petitioner is not entitled to 3RT Quarter she has to vacate the same and the respondents would allot her 2RT Quarter at Patigadda Colony as per her eligibility. In view of the above, both the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for GAD agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: The petitioner is granted one month time from today to vacate and handover the possession of the Quarter, in which she is now residing, to respondent No.3. Respondent No.3 shall forthwith allot Quarter No.C-192 at Patigadda Colony to the petitioner as per her eligibility, as the same is said to be vacant. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 17.03.2008 Ksr/Nsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SPJS}