Lsp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1573 of 2005 Zunjurwad Narayan Govind ...Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & 2 ors. ...Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1578/2005 PETITION NO. 1578/2005 PETITION NO. 1578/2005 Shivaji University Teachers Association & anr. ...Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & 2 ors. ...Respondents Mr.S.M.Donge iby L.T.Satelkar for the Petitioner Mrs.M.P.Thakur, AGP for Respondent No.1 CORAM CORAM CORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH & : D.K.DESHMUKH & : D.K.DESHMUKH & N.D.DESHPANDE, N.D.DESHPANDE, N.D.DESHPANDE, JJ JJ JJ 5th 5th 5th June, 2008 June, 2008 June, 2008 P.C. . By both these petitions, petitioners claim that they are entitled to advance increments in terms of para-11 of Government Resolution dated 11-12-1999 copy of which is at Annexure ’A’ to this petition. They claim that those increments should be taken into consideration while fixing their pension. It is an admitted position that both the petitioners have retired from service. Petitioner in Writ Petition No. 1573/2005 retired on 30-8-1995 whereas the petitioner in Writ Petition No.1578/2005 retired on 31-12-1995. The Government Resolution dated 11-12-1999 in terms states that; "The revised scales are not applicable to teachers 2 who retired on or before 31st December 1995 and who worked on re-employment on that date, including those whose period of re-employment was extended after that date." Then clause-3 further states that " the revised scales of pay will be implemented with effect from 1st January, 1996." 2. Thus, nothing in the Government Resolution dated 11-12-1999 is applicable to the teachers who retired on or before 31-12-1995. As both the petitioners had retired before 1-1-1996, nothing in the Government resolution dated 11-12-1999 will apply to them and, therefore, there is no question of petitioners being given two advance increments under clause-11 of the G.R. and then re-fixing their salary and deciding their pension on the basis of that re-fixed salary. Both petitions have no substance. They fail. Dismissed. 3. Rule discharged with no order as to costs. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J) (D.K.DESHMUKH,J) (D.K.DESHMUKH,J) (N.D.DESHPANDE,J) (N.D.DESHPANDE,J) (N.D.DESHPANDE,J)