IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10038 of 2010 NAGENDRA MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 07.04.2010 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the state. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Petitioner had moved for anticipatory bail earlier which was dismissed as withdrawn by order dated 18.12.2009. It is submitted that the petitioner is working as a Supervisor in S.K.S. Ispat & Power Ltd. Company at Indore. The case was tried with respect to the other accused persons and by order dated 12th of September 2008 the trial ended in acquittal as the prosecution failed to prove the charges. The learned A.P.P. is not in a position to refute the above submission. Considering the fact and circumstance of the case let the petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rupees ten thousand with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Belaganj Police Station Case No. 49 of 1993 on - 2 - terms and condition mentioned in Sub Section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Praful (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)