IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23724 of 2010 VINAY KUMAR SAO @ BIRJU, SON OF LATE RAM PRASAD SAO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code was added. Considering that the petitioner was arrested with the alleged stolen Bolero, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the serious nature of the offence. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)