THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P. No. 6032 of 2009 Oral order: This C.R.P. is directed against the docket order dated 12.06.2009, passed by the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, in I.A. No. 822 of 2009 in I.P. No. 22 of 2009. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners filed counter to the I.A. on 05.06.2009, and even the Court below recorded the same in its docket proceedings on 05.06.2009, however, ignoring the said fact, the Court below, observing that the petitioners, namely respondent Nos. 2 and 3, though appeared through counsel did not file counter, on 12.06.2009, while directing posting of the matter on 19.08.2009, restrained the petitioners herein from alienating the schedule property to any third parties. The learned counsel submits that the schedule property is the self-acquired property of the petitioners and they have nothing to do with the litigation. He further submitted that even though the matter was listed on 19.08.2009, but due to non-availability of the Presiding Officer, the matter was not taken up, and it was adjourned. He submits that since the petitioners having nothing to do with the litigation, the order under revision passed by the Court below, restraining them from alienating the schedule property is liable to be set aside, and accordingly, prayed that the C.R.P. be allowed by setting aside the order under revision. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondents justified the order under revision. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the C.R.P. with the following directions: The order dated 12.06.2009 under revision, is set aside. The matter is remanded to the Court below. Inasmuch as the petitioners have filed their counter, as is evident from the court docket, the Court below is directed to consider the application afresh, by taking into consideration the counter filed by the petitioners herein, and after providing opportunity to all the parties, and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, the petitioners are directed not to alienate the schedule property. Accordingly, the C.R.P. is allowed. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 24th February, 2011 KSR