IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24319 of 2010 ASHOK RAI @ BHUTTI RAI, S/o Late Wakil Rai. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 06.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that on the disclosure of the petitioner solar plates were recovered from the house of the co-accused, Mustaquim Mian, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case shall not be bifurcated for purposes of commitment or framing of charge. In case, it is done the petitioner’s prayer for bail shall not be considered at that stage. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)