IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1863 of 2009 MD.NASAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 17.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for petitioner Md. Nasar one of the FIR named accused of Khajekala P.S. Case No. 142 of 2008 registered under sections 307 and 326 and other allied sections of the Penal Code as also under section 27 of the Arms Act and he is in custody since 21.10.2008. The allegation against the petitioner is of having used fire arms causing injuries to the informant, Ram Pravesh and his mother Kaushilya Devi. So far as injury of mother of informant is concerned it is grievous whereas the injury on Ram Pravesh is simple but both the injuries reveal that there is tatooing and charring which would mean that the firing was done from a very close range. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that for the same occurrence he has filed a Complaint Case No. 103 of 2008 on 21.10.2008. The filing of the complaint case two days later may be a modus operendi to give a tinge of “case and counter case” of the entire occurrence and save his own skin. Be that as it may since the petitioner is alleged to have fired from close range and caused fire arm injury on two persons, one of which is a grievous one, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at the present moment. He may, however, renew his prayer for bail after one year. Spd/- (Abhijit Sinha, J.)