w" ¥;iih.^ j'll' \6t '"Q- ^i HIGH COURT OFCHHA.TTISGARH AT BILAJSPUR CR.REV.PR.NO. 2587/3008 SB : Hou"ole Mf. T.P. Sharma, u. APPUCANT Versus NON-APPUC&NTS 3. Panis SiTigti S/o. nharain SingTi Kshatrl, aged about 3G years, Occupation Agricultiire, R/o. Baiuya, Thaaa Saht»pur, Lohaia, Post Udya Kliurd, Tahsfl aad Distt. Kabirdham., KawariTia (CO) Snit. Sunita Bai, W/o. Paras SingTi Kshatri, aged about 34 years, Ocupation Housewife, Not knowa Kn. Mainta Rai, n/o. Paras SiTigti, aged about 12 years Kii. Chandni Bai, D/o. Paras Singti, ^ed about 5 years Non-applicant No. 2 & 3 are mmor fhiough legal guardiaai mofher Smt. Sunita Bai W/o. Paias Singh, R/o. Kopedabari, P.S. Khamahriya Distt. Uurg (CG) REVISION UNDERSECTION 19(410FTHB FAMILY COURT ACT Present: Shri R.K.Shanna, counsel for fhe applicant. ORAL OM)ER (Passcd on 30th July, 2008) T1iis petition is dircctE'd against. the order dated 7,01.2008 passd by fhe Third Additonal Principal ijudge, Famity Coiirt, nnrg (CG) OaTnp Coiirt Bemetara in case. No. 241/2007 wherehy the .Jndge, Pamily Cmirt has awarded TnaiTiteTiaTicc ofRs. 700/- tn Tion-applicant No.1 w1io is t.he wife of appticant, Rs. 300/- to Tion-appticaTit No.2 and Rs. 200/- to non- applicant No.3 who arc daiighter oft.he applicant. 2. This petition lias heen preferre-d afiter a de1ay of 72 days of its llTnitfltioTi. ^vw^"l^'.^!"i*:-:;:l"^^;1"*^ ^'ew"»^ ;(t^:'*g i; 3. I^eamed coiinsel for tTic appellaTit ~h»s filed I.A. No. 01/2008, application forcondonatioTi ofdelay in fiting the petition. 4. (t. is argiied on heTialf of the applicant that in ahsence of kTTowledge of law, fhf. applicant. Tnas not. been filed within the period of liinitetioTi. Thc application is siipported by an affidavit. 5. Order impiigned penised. 6. Non-applicant No.1, who is the wife of applicant. TiiWs claimed inaintenance on the basis of his second mamsge. Accorfing to para 7 of the ordcr impngned the applicant TiimsE'lf has stflted that Tie has contactcd sccond inarriage. This itself is a groiind for claina of maintenance. The TnaiTitfTiance awarded to the non-applicants are not. cxcessive. There is no casc on merits and thc applicant has also not. be^n ahle to satislv the groiinds for de1ay in filing the petition. 7. 1n view of the ahove, I.A. No. 01/2008 stands dismissed. Conseqiiently, t1ie pctition is also distnisscd. T. P. Sharma Judge ^/