GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 4764 OF 2000 PETITION NO. 4764 OF 2000 PETITION NO. 4764 OF 2000 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri A.V. Anturkar for the petitioner. Mrs.S.S. Bendhe AGP for the State. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & SMT. SMT. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 12TH JANUARY, 2005 12TH JANUARY, 2005 12TH JANUARY, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the Notification under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 on the ground that provisions of Sections 14 and 15 are not made applicable to the area in question while issuing Notification under section 11 of the Re-settlement Act of 1976. This is therefore an objection raised to the capacity or jurisdiction of the acquiring body to proced under section 4 and thereafter to acquire land for alleged public purpose. It is therefore a valid objection, which can be raised under section 5(a) of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 before the appropriate acquiring authority. Thereafter the provisions of section 5(a) will take care of the hearing of this petition. Consequently the petition as framed today is pre-mature. It is accordingly disposed of. 2. In view of the above, the civil application is also disposed of. ****