IN THE HIGH COURTOF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. RSA No.4770 of 2010 Date of decision: 10.12.2010 Satish Garg ..Appellant vs Indu Rekha and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG. Present: Mr.Madan Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant Rakesh Kumar Garg,J.(Oral) This is defendants' second appeal challenging the judgment and decrees of the Courts below whereby suit for recovery was decreed against him. Nirmla Devi plaintiff-respondent had filed a recovery suit alleging that the amount was given on loan to the appellant by Shri Dharam Pal Gaur,her husband. In the pleadings the appellant had admitted the advancement of loan to him. However, a specific stand was taken that the amount of loan stood re-paid to Dharampal Gaur from whom he borrowed. However, the Courts below, on appreciation of evidence have recorded a concurrent finding that the appellant has failed to prove the factum that he re-paid the loan amount to Dharampal Gaur. Even before this Court, no material evidence to controvert the finding of the Courts below could be pointed out. In view of the aforesaid, no interference is warranted in the impugned order. No substantial question of law arises in this appeal. Dismissed. ( Rakesh Kumar Garg) Judge December 10, 2010 rk