IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 13627 of 2009 Between: 1 Dasari Kondala Rao, S/o. Sriramulu, R/o. 7th Ward, Sunkulavari thota, Kavali Town, Sri Potti Sriramulu Nellore district. 2 Davuluri Samson, S/o. Vandanam, R/o. 11th Ward, Arundhatiwada, Kavali Town, Sri Potti Sriramulu Nellore district. 3 Golla Rama Devi, W/o. Nageswara Rao, Bheemavaram Village, Ulavapadu Mandal, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Tahsildar, Kavali Mandal, Nellore District. 3 The Sub-Registrar Kavali, Sri Potti Sriramulu Nellore District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Manamus declaring the high handed action of the respondent No.2 in trying to dispossess the petitioners from their plot Nos. 13, 14 and 9 respectively, situated in Sy.N. 823/3, Kotswari Layout, Musunuru Village, Kavali Mandal, sri Potti Sriramulu Nellore District and the action of the 3rd respondent in not allowing the petitioners to register the plots from their vendors, is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to principles of natural justice and consequently direct the petitioners No.2 not to disposes the petitioners without following due procedure of the law and further direct the 3rd respondent to allow the petitioners to register the plots on their names and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: . THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 13627 of 2009 09-07-2009 Oral Order: The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners want to withdraw the writ petition with a view to pursue alternative remedies. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 09-07-2009 Pvks