1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 255 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO. 3714 OF 1992 Babulal Gangaprasadji Kedia .... Plaintiff Vs. Shri Gopal Gangaprasadji Kedia .... Defendents & Ors. Mrs. Sudha Kamal Tibrewala & .... Respondents. Ors. Mr. Kukreja i/b Kukreja & Co. for Plaintiff. Ms. Sheetal Sonawane for respondent nos. 1 and 2 CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATE : 27TH AUGUST, 2007 DATE : 27TH AUGUST, 2007 DATE : 27TH AUGUST, 2007 P.C. 1) Respondents represented by the Advocates. According to the respondents, they have no interest in the suit property. However, the respondents are being brought on record as heirs and legal respresentatives of deceased-defendant No.6. In the main proceedings, the respondents may be free to take such stand as may be advised. 2) Although, there is a delay in taking out of the present Chamber Summons for the reasons mentioned in the affidavit in support being 2 sufficient cause and in the interest of justice, therefore, Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of Prayer clauses (a) to (c). Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today. ( A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.) ( A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.) ( A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)