IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) No.12613 of 2008 Date of decision : April 29, 2011 Manchal Dev …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. K.S. Banyal, Advocate, vice Mr. Raj Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. Surjit Singh, Judge(Oral) Heard and gone through the record. This Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 that he shall treat the present writ petition as a representation by the petitioner and pass a speaking order, within three months, from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment, together with a copy of the petition, directed to be treated as representation. Copy dasti. April 29, 2011(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?