. ff"^ 9 B@R©h ^-^•^^•J ^^' ys^ IN tHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. p. s. NO. <3°H^ OF 2011 PETITIONER : Bali Ram Chaurasia S/o Shri Chaitu Ram aged about-55 years, Head Master Government Girls Middle School, Surangpani Block- Pathalgaon Distt. Jashpur (C.G.j. VERSUS RESPONDENTS l.^State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal Development, Raipur, (C.G.). S.^Assistant Coinmissioner, Tribal Development, Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur ^ (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Pathalgaon, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA "-^^^^^s^"" <(1*1?IT fl»^W<»» 5"T •^l<1M<f, •S-fliy'IG, tsidl'y^ ^.M-L[s;..hN;.5°lsl.lrt..!.. s^ SflSRI 'qgqT (•j^t^qy!) 311^1VI f<-) '(WTSn^TT^qN? wiiwotei 3ii^i SB: Hon'ble Shri fclanindra Mohan Shr 17.06-2011 Shri M. K. Sinha, counsel forthe |j Shri Sushil Dubey, Government on advance copy. Heard. Learned oounsel for the petitione obtained B. Ed. Degree in theyear 1978 service, therefore, he is also enttted for is further submitted that the Block Educttion Offlcer, Block Leilunga, District Raigarh, vide order dated 12-04-1981 ss|ictioned two advance inCTements to the petitioner, beneflt of which, was e: conferring Pandey Pay Scale. Howeverj Choudhary Pay Scale, benefit oftwo ad\(ance increments as per order dated 12-04-1981, has not been extended to th| Learned State counsel submitted! considered in accordance with the relel State Government in the matter of gr^nt of two advance inorements, in oases, where B. Ed. degree has beerj entering into the sen/ice. In view of the aforesaid submissiiiin made, it is directed that the claim of the petitioner for grant of two advanc^ decided by the respondent No.^ Development, Jashpur, District.Jashpurj verificatiDnoffacts. With the aforesaid direotion, the p| ^tI^fe^M' *n*«nf^f fsl^l <F;>(^1< ^siRlHSii^t vastava. J. letitioner. ^dvooate for the State/respondents f submits that as the petitioner had on his own cost, prior to come into Igrant of two advance increments. It ^tended to the petitioner while not thereafter, upon implementation of spetitioner. that case of the petitioner would be /ant circulars and guidelines of the obtained at his own cost, before increments shall be considered and -Assistant Commissioner, Tribai in accordance with law, sublect to stition is finalty disposed off. !|ll<l.fl<l S-S«1i;"llol<l, U^K'lld—FS/140—2/2011—1,50,000. Sd-/ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava T Judge r