IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.9438-M of 2010 Date of Decision:28.7.2010 Rani and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Balraj Gujjar, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Priyanka Dalal, A.A.G. Haryana. Mr. Vikas Awasthy, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing of FIR No.79 dated 24.1.2010 registered under Sections 406/498-A/506/34 IPC at Police Station Rohtak. Upon notice, reply has been filed by Pardeep Kumar, Inspector/SHO, Police Station City, Rohtak on behalf of respondent No.1. As per para 9 of the of the reply, the petitioners never demanded any dowry articles from the complainant and they have been found innocent in this case. In view of the reply filed by the State, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous at this stage and the same may be dismissed as such. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 28.7.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE