IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.217 of 2009 Raj Ballam Rai & Anr Versus Ramjharo Kuer & Ors ---------------------------------- 4 30.11.2011 Mr. Vikas Ratan Bharti, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that by the impugned order the court below has rejected the prayer to delete the amended portion of the plaint and as such this order is interlocutory in nature. The learned counsel has prayed for permission to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the constitution of India in view of the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar, reported in 2010(2) PLJR 954. Permission is accorded. The petitioners are granted four weeks time to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the constitution of India failing which this revision application shall stand rejected without further reference to the bench. Namita ( V.Nath , J.)