IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20546 of 2009 PAPPU DARJI @ AHSAN ALI Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 18.06.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that it was the love affair. Petitioner married the victim girl, who voluntarily followed him but her age appears in the case categorizing her as minor. If marriage is made a defence then that can be taken easily as admission about sexual intercourse and in the case that is with the minor girl comes within the definition of under Section 376 of I.P.C. also. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)