WP/9661/2010 : 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9661 OF 2010 Schireiber Dynamics Dairy Ltd. ... Petitioner V/s. Schireiber Dynamics Dairy Employees Union ... Respondent Mr.K.S. Bapat for Petitioner None for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: DECEMBER 21, 2010 P.C.: 1. The petition has been preferred against an interim order passed by the Industrial Court, Pune in a complaint filed by the respondent Union under Item 9 of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act. The Industrial Court has on the basis of the settlement which was produced on record accepted the case of the union, that prima facie there was a breach of clause 9 of the settlement. In these circumstances, the Industrial Court has directed the petitioner not to relocate any employee unless such relocation is decided jointly with the complainant. 2. Prima facie, this appears to be a correct reading of the clause 9 of the settlement. In my opinion, since a discretionary relief has been granted by the Industrial Court which cannot be termed as perverse there is no need to interfere with the order under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. The Petition is rejected.