IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 19th day of October, 2006 Crl. Bail Application No. 891 of 2006 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Sukhpal S/o Hari Singh R/o Belda, P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar. ............ Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ............. Opposite Party __________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Crime No. 196 of 2006 Under Sections: 379, 411 of I.P.C. Police Station: Kotwali Roorkee District: Haridwar. __________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard Mr. Sanjeev Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Manoj Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State. Applicant Sukhpal, who is in jail in connection with crime No. 196 of 2006, relating to offences punishable under Section 379, 411 of I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail. The applicant has been shown to be a pillion rider, at the time of recovery of a stolen motocycle, which was being driven by co-accused, who could not show the papers of the same. Para 10 of the counter affidavit, filed by the State shows that there is no criminal history of the present applicant. After considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail. Let the applicant Sukhpal be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt. 19.10.2006 H. Negi