THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOs.4070 AND 4073 OF 2009 COMMON ORDER: Since these two revisions arise out of same proceedings, they are taken up together for disposal. The petitioner-plaintiff seeks to assail the correctness of the orders dated 16.07.2009 in I.A.Nos.477 and 476 of 2009 in O.S.No.78 of 2003 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bapatla, filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 {CPC}, to reopen the matter and adduce the evidence of DWs.3, 4 and another witness and under Order XVIII Rule 17 and Section 151 CPC to recall D.Ws.3 and 4 for the purpose of their cross examination respectively. Taking into account the relevant circumstances and chequered events, the Court below dismissed the two applications. Hence, these two revisions. It is evident that D.Ws.3 and 4 were examined as long back as on 30.03.2009 and later these two applications were filed. When the matter has got adjourned several times thereafter and coming up on 16.07.2009, the petitioner did not appear and hence, the said applications were closed. Though affidavits were filed in support, they remained totally silent as to when initially D.Ws.3 and 4 were examined. In the absence of explanation forthcoming, the Court below was right in dismissing the said applications. Hence, both the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 19th March 2010 RRB