IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6104 of 2007 1. Nirjala Ram, Son of Late Lachhan Ram, Resident of Parsa (Gora), Police-Station- Shanichari, District- West Champaran. 2. Bahadur Ram, Son of Late Vishwanath Ram, Resident of Village- Gora, Police-Station- Shanichari, District- West- Champaran. ..... Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Collector, West Champaran, at Bettiah. 4. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms. West Champaran, Bettiah. 5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Bettiah. 6. The Circle Officer, Jogapatti, Police- Station- Jogapatti, District- West Champaran. 7. The Superintendent of Police, West Champaran, Bettiah. 8. The Officer-in-Charge, Jogapatti, Police- Station- Jogapatti, District- West Champaran. ..... Respondents. ----------- 02- 4.2.2009 Heard Mr. Arvind Prasad No.1 for the petitioners, and Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, learned assistant counsel to Government Pleader No.12. Two petitioners have joined this writ petition, seeking a common direction to the respondent- authorities to ensure delivery of possession to them with respect to the lands of which parcha has been issued to them. The respondents have explained the position. 2. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. It appears that the 2 land ceiling proceedings were initiated against certain land-holders, who are not parties here. In view of the orders of the learned L.R.D.C. and the learned appellate authority, certain lands were declared surplus. The authorities hastened to issue parchas in favour of the two petitioners herein allotting part of the surplus lands to the petitioners. The land-holders had thereafter moved the learned revisional officer and he was allowed one more unit, as a result of which no surplus land was left. Consequently the lands distributed and the parchas issued in favour of the petitioners were cancelled. The impugned action cannot, therefore, be faulted. 3. The writ petition is dismissed. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/