IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17549 of 2009 RAMASHRAY PRASAD, son of Bhatu Das, village Dhimpraper, PS Hilsa, Dist. Nalanda. Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU.VIGILENCE ----------- 2 11.6.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is accused in a case under section 13(ii) read with section 13(i) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The allegation is that the petitioner has not been able to explain the income and assets of Rs. 25 lakhs which were earned by him during his tenure in service as Inspector, Weights & Measures. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the calculation while assessing the assets of the petitioner is misplaced. The authorities have not taken into account the diary business run by his wife. Besides this they have also not considered that the petitioner could have saved at least Rs. 20 lakhs from the salary earned by him over a period of thirty eight years. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case and the petitioner has remained in custody for four and half months. Considering this aspect the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in Special Case No. 2/2009, arising out of Vigilance PS Case No. 5/2009, on furnishing bail bond of rupees ten thousand with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge Vigilance II, Patna, with the condition that if need be he will make himself available to the investigating authority. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)