IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11687 of 2010 Amar Poddar, son of Late Rameshwar Poddar, Resident of Village Pahsara, P.S. Naokothi, District Begusarai ……. Petitioner Versus The state of Bihar …….. Opp. Party ----------- 3. 14.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This application is for anticipatory bail for offence under Sections 304-B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is the husband. There is an allegation of demand and suspecting allegations are omnibus regarding demand. It is said that she was burnt to death and cremated. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no specific over act against the petitioner and he is living separately after family partition. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the allegations against the petitioner are only omnibus and general in nature and whatever specific allegation has been made is against Jitendra and Dharmendra and the case is still under investigation. Having regard to the allegation about demand, subjecting cruelty and death in suspicious circumstances as 2 dead body found on the bank of Gandak, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, if the petitioner surrenders and files a petition for regular bail that may be considered on it’s own merit without being prejudiced of this order preferably on the same day. S.S. ( Gopal Prasad, J. )