HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP. 1S) No. 3780 of 2005 Petitioner Smt. Usha Tamrkar Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & another SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J $hri Rakesh Anthony, Advocate for the petitioner. V V s Murthy, Deputy Advocate General with Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the reepondentsIState ORDER ’1, ( Passed on this 9‘“ day of March, 2007) The foliowing order of the Court is passed by Satish K Agnihotri, 1. The petitioner while working as Assistant Teacher In Primary Girls Schooi Patan District Durg was transferred to Primary School Atari on the same terms and oondmons, vrde order dated 6.9.2001 (Annexure N1). 2. The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Raipur vide interim order dated 14.9.2001 directed to maintain status quo in regard to the position of the petitioner as it was prevailing on 12.9.2001. By virtue of the interim order the petitioner is continuing at the originai place of posting. 3. Be that as it may, with the passage of time this petition has become infructuous as period of transfer is not applicable forever. At this point of time there is no question to examine the validity of the transfer order. However, the respondents are at liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in view the public interest and administrative exigency, without insisting on compliance of the impugned transfer order. 4. It is well settled principle of law that transfer is an incident of service and it is for the employer to decide as to where a particular omcer/employee be posted keeping in view public interest as well as administrative exigency This Court has limited iunsdiction to interfere in the transfer matter and this Court can interferc only in the case of proved malafde non-competence of authority passrrg the. transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity with the rules and regulations. 5. ln view of the above, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 5 ‘ " l ...; 3d]- Thaku" Sansh K Agnlhotrl Judge i