[m^ HIGH^yi^OI^I-IH^i^GA^ ^^bi^;stONreiNGI^-.^:'^L..l::';':;c''.:l;^ jCORA&::'i^:I^N:!|l-iSHRl^Ei^^p^,^.J.? HG^BI-EySH^SUN81..^UN^RSINN^J. ApDSicant Petltioner NQn-aDDlieants Riesporiderits ^•^ |; |j: ^^: MCCNo.57of2010 Ratan KutTTar^^^^^^^J yeafB, Son of 1-afejShri Devaram .Jain, Correspondent,' R/o Bada Bazar, Chirmiri, DistrictKoi|ea,IVJ.j3.NpwC.G. ^VERSUS .:,.': •..:r:1^^ i, 1. State pf Madhyaj^^^^^^^^^ Secretary, Forestl Valfabh^^^^ B^ IViantralaya, Bhopali ISIcw State ^ Secretary Forest DKS Bhayan, l^lantraiaya, Raipurj(ChhattEsgarh). 2. Union ^pf lixlia,^^^^^^^]^ FQrestConservatiorE,NewDelhi. 3. Chief Conservatorj of FQiis9t, Valiabh Bhawari, Bhopal. J 4.ConservatorofForest;Ambikapur. 5. South Eastern :C?o®l Rields Lim^^ throughjtsNanagingDiNctor,Bilaspyr 6. President, C6ai {Inctja (Inciian .^Goa! Industry), Head OffJce Caloutta, West ;Bengal,;,.'.;-; -;'/:',,;|'.,.. ADDllcationij^restoi^onofVtf.P.Ncal.4^0^^^^ Present : PetitionerRatan H^marsJaih inperson. Shrl Kishore Bhaduri, learned jAdditional A GeneFal1x)rtheState/respondentsNo.1^3K&^^^^^^ Shri Aditya KJ^re, ieamed c^ 'No.2,^.^^^,:l;,^:-:/-:!.:-^:£ QF.N.K.Shukla,Senioi'^dyc)cat^withShriV.^ !earnedcdyhsetfQfresp6ndentsNo.S&6.^^ GRDER pth (27t"September,201©) The following order of the Courtj was ^^ RajeevGupta,C.J. l-earned counsei for thepartiesare hearclonlANo.1/2010, an appiication for eondonation of the delay in filing the restoration .petition.:...'',.'-'''•;.;••.',",.;.•.".'/"' • : r 2) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the groynds taken in the appiication, we are satisfied that the petitioner has succeeded in showing sufficient cause for the deiay in filing the restoration petitlon. 3) 1A N0.1/2010, therefore,isalldwedand|thedelaYof 60 days in fiiing the restoration petition is hereby condoned. 4) Learned counsel for the parties are heard on the restoration petition. ; 5) The petitioner is seeking restoratjon of W.P.No.4520/2000 which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 03.11.2009. : 6) On due consideration of the submissions of leamed counsel for the parties and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, we are satisfied that the petitioner's absence on 03.11.2009, when WP No.4520/2000 was taken up for hearing was based on bona ffcfe grounds. 7) MCC No. 57/2010, therefore, is allowed and WP No.4520/2000 is restored to its original number. Sd/- ChiefJustice subbu Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge