THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.751 of 2010 DATED: 01.07.2010 Between: Achina Mallesh and another .. Petitioners And The Station House Officer, P.S. Pahadi Shareef, Cyberabad and others. .. Respondents ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent No.1- Station House Officer, Pahadi Shareef Police Station, Cyberabad. It is the grievance of the petitioners that, at the instance of the unofficial respondents i.e. respondents 2 and 3 herein, respondent No.1 is interfering with the civil disputes between them and the unofficial respondents, and encouraging the unofficial respondents to trespass into their land in Sy.No.17, admeasuring Ac.5.00, situated at Kongarakurdu ‘B’ village, Maheswaram Mandal of Ranga Reddy District, in respect of which there is an order of interim injunction in their favour. This Court, while issuing notice before admission on 22.01.2010, passed interim orders, directing respondent No.1 not to interfere with the civil disputes between the parties and not to encourage the unofficial respondents to trespass into the subject land, for a period of four weeks. Seeking to vacate the said interim orders, the unofficial respondents filed a vacate stay petition in W.V.M.P.No.830 of 2010 and, in their counter-affidavit filed in support of the said petition, they denied the allegations made by the petitioners. Today, when the matter came up for consideration, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home produced the written instructions received by him from respondent No.1, wherein, while denying the allegations made by the petitioners, it is stated that, on receipt of complaints from respondents 2 and 3, cases were registered against the petitioners in Crime No.432 of 2009, for the offences punishable under Sections 468, 471 and 420 I.P.C., and in Crime Nos.6 and 29 of 2010, for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 427 and 506 I.P.C., and that investigation in the said cases is pending. It is further stated that, except registration of the aforesaid cases basing on the cognizable complaints, the respondent police never interfered with the civil disputes between the parties nor encouraged the unofficial respondents to trespass into the land in question, and that with a view to prevent the police from taking any action against them in connection with those cases, the petitioners filed the present writ petition. In view of the aforesaid stand taken by respondent No.1, no further orders need be passed in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed, placing on record the written instructions of respondent No.1 referred above. No order as to costs. __________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 1st July, 2010 IBL