^3v£f<-qiqic>'i<, tPTn'<1<l<o, ROIX-I^ ^m^i W^l^ 3TT^9T q^i? (^clijd^) ^200 3n^^Tc?)Tf^TTc^ ^SHSTT^^T^^Tcp i^TT^R ^rf^T 3TT^^T (Sinale Bench; Hon'b e Mr, Justice bhirendra Mishra) W.P (Petition U/A 2||26 of Constitution of India) PETCTIONERS Chho I'e Lal, S/o sri Garjan, Aged about 31 Occupation-working as Panchayat Gram Panchayat Basantpur, Janpad Pancl^ayat- Bamnhideeh, bistrict Janjgir- Chamba (CS). year^ Karmi Vs RESPONbENTS 1. S+ s4 b4 2. bi| s4 3. D4 b^ oi 4. Zi| E4 (C( 5. CH Present: Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Adv. w Mr. M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Ad Mr. Sanjay Patel, Advocate for cpi^[c^41vi +ii+ic">T^'f^^£i^FJI^-CI^ ^ 3Tf^T 3TT^5T [s] No.6345/08 (ate of Chhattisgarh, Through: the ^cretary, Panchayat and Social ^partment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). i^ector, Panchayat and Rural Services tnchanalaya, b.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Iputy Director, Panchayat and Rural tvelopment bepartment, bistrict |fice- Jonjgir-Champa (CG) Panchayat, Through its Chief <|ecutive Officer, bistt. Janjgir Champa ^) ief Executive Officer, Janpad Pajichayat Bamhanideah, bistt. Janjgir- Cl^ampa (CG) Sc^rpanch/ (5ram Panchayat Basantpur, Jajnpad Panchayat Bamhanideah, bistt. Ja^jgir- Champa. i|t-h Mr. I.S. Sahu, Adv. for the petitioner. h for the State. Irespondent No.6. ,,^^^ /^/ •^ ^'wl7:3TraTp5ZT, y>-al'<-i<i<». Rrti^y<< ^im^i §>W^ 3IT^^Tcy)Tf^TTcp cT^nOT^^T^m^ L 3TT^97 q=R5 (^cll^d^) W^ 200 ^RTTST^ ^rf^T 3TT^$T Basa^tpur 14.11.2008 Heard. By this petition the pejt respondent No.3-t)eputy bir|e< Department, District Office- ^ Panchayat Secretary as per pr^ Avam Gram Swaraj AdhiniyamJ Grievance of the petil Panchayat Karmi vide resolutio^ by the Gram Panchayat Panchayat Karmi vide order da-) the petitioner joined the servi] of the peti'tioner was Panchayat to the respondent respondent No.3 vide his memjo direction from the respondentj whether the appointments ma<|< can be declared Panchayat directions of the State Govei] 29.8.2008. The respondent ^< clarified that the Panchayat before 29.8.2008 may be not| forwartded HJo cpi^fojl^t +ii+ic^T^(^L<31<Ri^i<< ?R3lf^T3n^9T ^itioner is praying for a direction to the |ector. Panchayat <& Rural bevelopment fanjgir-Champa to declare the petitioner as )visions of Section 69 of the Panchayat Raj |1993 (for short 'the Adhiniyam'). [•ioner is that he was duly setected as of Annexure P-2 dated 12.7.2008 passed Thereafter, he was appointed as 1-ed 12.8.2008 of Annexure P-4, whereupon, i|ces on 15.8.2008 vide Annexure P-5. Case by Gram Panchayat through Janpad ).3-beputy Director on 5.9.2008 and the dated 27.9.2008 (Annexure P-6) sought |No.2-Director, Panchayat <& Rural Service, |e prior to 29.8.2008 of Panchayat Karmis s|cretaries after coming into force of new 1-nment in this regard vide circular dated Uo.2 vide communication dated 30.9.2008 <|irmis whose appointments have been made |fied as Panchayat Secretaries under the K<|irmis ji r ^, '*^\^ '••'^^s g'-CTT <-qiqlrt«,U>Tll^-l<l<o, Rioi^-t^ ^m^iW^l^ srr^^Tcmf^Tt^ cTSTTSn^^T^HTc^ A 3TT^9T q^P? (^c|[^4c€i) ^200 ^^TTW ^Tf|rcT 3TT^^T __.-^ represerltation provisions of the Adhiniyam. been by the respondent No.3 a\ Panchayat to initiate fresh Karmi. Mr. Bhatia, learned coun|s( petitioner files fresh birector, for redressal of his shall be considered and decide<)l four weeks from the date of r4< In view of the above with a direction to the petition^i the grievances raised in this] along with certified copy of made, the respondent No.3 is with law within aperiod of representation. Certified copy as per rul^s IHowever, till date no such declaration has |id on the contrary he is directing the Gram p^oceedings for appointment of Panchayat cpi<4frtJ1Ti ^i+ioT'^fe^t ><FJI^-$I^ ^3lf^T3TT^5T n|sel for the State submits that in case the before the respondent No.S-beputy ^rievances raised in this petition, the same by the respondent No.3 within a period of |ceipt of the representation. sufcjmission, the instant petition is disposed of •ion^r to make fresh representation, raising all petition, before respondent No.3 herein tl^is order and on such representation being (tjirccted to decide the same in accordance weeks from the date of receipt of the tHis folir Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge