IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.24 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5825 OF 2009 Rajendra Shripati Awatade and others. ... Appellants Versus Vithal Ambadas Pawar and others. ... Respondents Mr. Sameer A. Kumbhakoni for the appellants. Mr. R.S. Alange for the respondent No.1. Mr. S.D. Rairikar, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent No.2. CORAM : J.N. PATEL, ACTING C.J. & B.R. GAVAI, J. DATED : 29TH JANUARY, 2010 P.C. The appeal challenges the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 15th January, 2010 thereby dismissing the petition filed by the present appellants. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that provisions of section 49 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 have not been followed by the Tahsildar before passing the order impugned. The learned Single Judge has found that all the three authorities have concurrently held that the notice was issued to the petitioner before taking action under section 49. 3. We have also perused the order passed by the Tahsildar dated 18th May, 2007 which was passed in the proceeding after they were remanded back. It is clear from the said order that when spot inspection was carried out on 3rd May, 2007, the present appellant was also present after the notice was issued to him. In that view of the matter, we find no error or illegality in the order passed by the learned Single Judge which confirms the orders passed by the three authorities. Appeal is dismissed. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI, J.