1512cwp582.11. 1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No. 582/2011 Purushottam Narayan Iwanathe vs. State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Inspector of General Prison (Eastern Region, Nagpur) and others. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. Miss Archana Ramteke, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T.A.Mirza, APP for respondents. CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & P.B.VARALE,JJ DATE : 15.12.2011 This petition, under article 226 of the Constitution of India, takes exception to the order dated 26.8.2011 passed by the authorities rejecting the application of the petitioner seeking his release on furlough. It appears that the principal reason for rejecting the application of the petitioner seeking his release on furlough was that the petitioner, when released on furlough on 15.12.2006, had absconded for 1116 days and was required to be arrested. It also appears that the petitioner had been granted parole on 1512cwp582.11. 2` 21.5.2010 and the petitioner was late by 101 days in surrendering. In that light of the matter, therefore, we cannot fault the order of the respondents rejecting the application. However, we clarify that in future, if the petitioner applies for his release either on parole or furlough, the said application should be decided in accordance with law uninfluenced by the order impugned in the present petition. Petition is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE patle