IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10474 of 2009 V.G.COMMUNICATIONS Versus BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIO ----------- 3 3.9.2009 By Office Order No.23 dated 4.5.2009 contained in annexure-3 the Deputy Secretary,B.P.S.C., authorized the petitioner to take videigraphy of the ensuing examination at various centres. Pursuant to his selection the petitioner vide his letter dated 14.5.2009 addressed to respondent no.4 requested him to release advance of Rs.16/- lacs for purchasing materials and for giving advance to various videography. The learned counsel submits that in course of preparatory steps for videography, the petitioner incurred a huge expenditure. However, respondent abruptly withdrew the Office Order authorizing the petitioner to do videography. The petitioner submits that he incurred huge expenditure in engaging various agencies.But the respondent all on a sudden stopped to get the videography done. Mr. K.B. Nath for B.P.S.C., submits that the claim of the petitioner needs scrutiny. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, this Court observes that if the petitioner files representation before the Secretary, B.P.S.C., within a period of three weeks from today, he would dispose of the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law by passing a speaking order within a period of three months thereof. In case he finds that any amount is payable to the 2 petitioner, the same should be paid without much delay. With the aforesaid observation this writ application is disposed of. Anilkrsinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)