IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1400 of 2009 1. NEMDHARI RAI S/O LATE HORIL RAI R/OVILL DIGHI KALAN , P.O. HOJIPUR, ANCHAL AND P.S. HAJIPUR, DISTT- VAISHALI. --------- Petitioner/Appellant Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION (HEAD QUARTER) BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR , CONSOLIDATION VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR. 4. RAJ KUMARI DEVI W/O MAHENDRA RAI R/OVILL DIGHI KALAN , P.S. HAJIPUR SADAR, P.O. AND ANCHAL HAJIPUR, DISTT- VAISHALI. -------------- Respondents/Respondents ----------- For the Appellant :- Mr. Bhola Bhai Desai, Adv. For the State :- Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, AC to GA-VI ---------- 3 08.04.2010 In this appeal, the challenge is to the order dated 9.2.2009 passed by the learned single Judge in C.W.J.C. No. 11189 of 2007. We have heard Mr. Bhola Bhai Desai, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, learned counsel for the State. On a perusal of the order passed by learned single Judge, it transpires that he has declined to interfere with the order passed by the revisional authority on the ground that the revisionist had purchased the property by way of registered sale deed dated 17.8.1995. On a query being made, we have been apprised at the Bar that the 2 genuineness of the sale deed could not have been gone into by the consolidation authority under the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956. Be it noted, the appellant/petitioner has already filed Title Suit No. 13 of 2000, which is pending for adjudication. In view of the aforesaid, we are not inclined to interfere in this appeal and accordingly, the same stands dismissed in limine. Rishi (Dipak Misra, CJ.) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)