IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY THE 22nd DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No. 8 3 7 OF 2009. Between : AP Scheduled Caste Co-operative Finance Corporation Ltd., Hyderabad, Represented by its Vice Chairman & Managing Director and two Ors. …….. Appellants V/s. K. Nirmal Babu, s/o Nageswara Rao aged 49 years, 0cc. Asst.Executive Engineer, Office of the Superintending Engineer, Social Welfare Circle, Guntur, Guntur district. …….. Respondent Counsel for the Appellants : SRI D.S.N.V. PRASADA BABU GOVT. PLEADER FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel for the Respondent : SRI B. ADINARAYANA RAO THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI A N D THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No. 8 3 7 of 2009 J U D G M E N T : (Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meenakumari) . The writ appeal is filed against order dated 25-3-2008 passed in WP.No. 5793 of 2008 by the learned single Judge, whereby the learned single Judge set aside the impugned order dated 27-2-2008 passed by the Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Co-operative Finance Corporation Limited, Hyderabad, placing the writ petitioner under suspension vide Proceedings RC.No. A6/2378/APSC/2000 and directed the official respondents not to entrust any duties to the writ petitioner, which would entail in financial commitments to the organization. 2. The main writ petition has been filed to declare the action of the second respondent in placing the writ petitioner under suspension vide Proceedings RC.No. A6/2378/APSC/2000, dated 27-2-2008, which is in violation of Rule 8 (1) of the A.P. Civil Services (CCA) Rules, as arbitrary, irrational and mechanical exercise of power and to set aside the same and to pass such other suitable orders. 3. When the matter came up today for admission, after condoning the delay of 174 days in filing the above writ appeal, vide orders dated 19-6-2009 passed by this Court in WAMP.No. 2836 of 2009, it is stated by the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare, Sri D.S.N.V. Prasada Babu that the unofficial respondent has been appointed in the Appellant-Corporation and nothing survives in this writ appeal for adjudication. 4. In view of the above submission made by the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare, the writ appeal is accordingly dismissed, as no further order is necessary. In the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI _____________________ JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR 22-07-2009 I s L