IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2775 of 2007 MD.TAHIR son of Late Moin Ashraf resident of Pailwar House, Gareria Khard, P.S. & District- Jehanabad (Retired Accountant, S.N.Sinha College Under Magadh University) Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Human Resources (Higher Education) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. The Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya, through its Vice Chancellor. 4. The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya 5. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya 6. The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya 7. Prinicpal, S.N.Sinha, College, Jehanabad, through the Magadh University. ----------- 3 24.06.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State and the University. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner retired from the services of the University on 30.06.2000, but till date he has not been paid his full pension and other retiral dues. Petitioner also represented before the authorities of the University, however the grievances of the petitioner has not been redressed till date. Mr. Rajendra Kumar Giri, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the University submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of the - 2 - grievances, as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.4 giving all the relevant details with regard to his grievances. In this view of the matter, it is directed that in case such representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order, the respondent no.4 shall consider and dispose of the same by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. Upon consideration, if the representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, the above respondent shall simultaneously issue necessary orders so that the grievances as raised in the representation of the petitioner could be redressed without delay in the light of the order passed by him on such representation. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)