IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15808 of 2008 MD.JAKI AHMAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 10/7/2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State. The stand taken by the petitioner is that Complaint case for the offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act has been filed after the divorce of the Complainant on 2.11.2006. Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party No. 2 submits that she has never received any intimation of the divorce as yet. It has also been submitted that she has got three daughters but the petitioner and his family members are adamant to harass and torture her. Considering this fact, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner Md. Jaki Ahmad is rejected in connection with Complaint Case No. 1148C of 2006. However, the case of the petitioner is not prejudiced for grant of regular bail. S.Ali (Mridula Mishra, J.)