IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Civil Review (T) No. 73 of 2008. Decided on: 23nd June, 2010. Jagdish Chand Shukla. ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. V.D. Khidtta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) This is a review petition at the instance of the petitioner before the Tribunal. At para 8 of the order dated 4.1.2008, the Tribunal has made a specific finding that the petitioner does not possess the requisite educational qualification or equivalent qualification. According to the petitioner, there is an error apparent on the face of the record since Annexures A-9 and A-10 would show that the petitioner possessed the equivalent qualification. Since this aspect is not gone into by the Tribunal, it is only proper that the matter be considered with reference to that contention. In that view of the matter, judgment dated 4.1.2008 in OA No. 56 of 2002 is recalled and the review petition is allowed, as above. 2. Post OA No.56 of 2002 for orders on 28th June, 2010. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 23nd June, 2010 ( Justice Kuldip Singh), (tr) Judge.