1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.285 OF 2006 IN NOTICE NO.946 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.2620 OF 1995 Shashikant G. Rane .. Plaintiff Versus Sitaram D. Rane & Ors. .. Defendants Mr.Anand Singh i/b. M.P.Vashi & Associates for plaintiff Mr.H.R.Desai for defendant No.3 Defendant No.1 present in person. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 12th March 2009. P.C. . Pursuant to the notice, first defendant Sitaram Dhondu Rane is present. He seeks time to engage an Advocate. At his request S.O. two weeks. 2. It was clarified to defendant No.1 that 2 the decree has been passed on 29th November 2003. The decree is directing the plaintiff to pay balance consideration and to defendant Nos. 1 and 2 to execute conveyance/ sale deed in favour of plaintiff. The Judgement Debtor No.1 was informed by me that notice under Order XXI Rule 22 has already been made absolute and execution application is pending. He must state on the next occasion as to whether he is ready and willing to comply with the decree and approve the draft forwarded to him or else this Court will pass an order in terms of Order XXI Rule 34 of C.P.C. This adjournment is granted as a last chance. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)