IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN THURSDAY, THE 20TH JANUARY 2011 / 30TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1393 of 2011(Y) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. SHUMSUDDIN, PULARI, EDAVA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DT. 2. SUBHASH. C., S/O.CHELLAPPAN, NADAYIL PADINJATTETHIL VEEDU, KAPPIL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SANTHOSH. M., S/O.MADHAVAN ACHARI, KAPIL P.O., NADAYIL PADINJATTATHIL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. VIJAYAKUMARI. J., D/O.SIVASANKARANASARI, KAPIL P.O., NADAYIL PADINJATTATHIL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. SUSHEELA, D/O.PARAMU, KAPIL P.O., NADAYIL PADINJATTATHIL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. BABY.C., S/O.MADHAVANASARI, NADAYIL PADINJATTATHIL, KAPPIL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 7. GEETHA, D/O.MADHAVANASARI, NADAYIL PADINJATTATHIL, KAPPIL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.SUBHASH CYRIAC WP(C).No. 1393 of 2011(Y) RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. TRAVANCORE DEVASWAM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN- 695 001. 2. DEVASWAM COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWAM BOARD, DO. DO. PIN- 695 001. 3. SUB GROUP OFFICER, KAPPIL BHAGAVATHY TEMPLE, KAPPIL P.O., PIN- 695 003. 4. THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE, KAPPIL BHAGAVATHY TEMPLE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KAPPIL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN- 695 003. 5. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA CIRCLE OFFICE, VARKALA P.O., 695 141. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.N. VENUGOPALA PANICKER, SC, TDB. R5 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER MR.R. LAKSHMI NARAYANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/01/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. ----------------------------------- W.P(C).No.1393 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of January, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. The seven petitioners say that they have some right in relation to the way which they alleged as existing. We do not want to say anything on the merits of the claim. We have seen Ext.P1, which is an order under Section 133 Cr.PC. In its effect, the writ petition is for execution of that order through the Sub Inspector of Police. In spite of Ext.P1, which holds that there is no obstruction, if the petitioners have any grievance, they have to work out their remedies in accordance with law before the civil court or the competent jurisdiction under the Cr.PC. There is absolutely nothing for the writ court to entertain on the request of the petitioners. The writ petition is dismissed without entering on merits. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- P.S.GOPINATHAN, Judge. kkb.20/1.