Ei3naE3E£3&rt2^£&^3[i»Ss3BSS(BBn(K anan .r' f®f IN THE HON'BLE HIGH_CQJJRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIbi\SPUR C-^lf. CM"CC]No.v^.72010. iSBf] ^u^, (Arising out of order dated 4.3.2010 passed in Cr.M.P..No.27/20 by this Hon'ble Court dismissing the same for want of prosecution, Applicant RESPONDENT -thandrabhan, S/o Hetram, P* aged about 35 years, Occupation Service, SECL Chhal .^t-.oV0 Khadan, Permanent r/o village \'" parsadih, Tahsil Bilaigarh, Distt. Raipur, Presently r/o village Khedapali, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, P.S. Chhal, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). Versus Ashok Kumar, S/o late Pannalal, taste Agrawa!, r/o village Kharsiya, Tahsil and P.S. Kharsjya, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). APPLICATIOJM. FOR RESTORATION OF Cr.M.P.NO. 27/2010 DI S MLSSE D FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION BY THIS HON'BLE COUR' ^^^ _ ~ ON 4'.3.2010. T XI-HC—78 HWvff sf»<n^ -SST ^|q|(r|<<, ®tl|y<|<o,FsK'll'y^ ..(l...b;..(7:...£^.:...'L:H%{(? a;il^?lTR?T ('i?t^«(<;il) sn^i ^T R-<i'i> •(tqisn^raTOW ^- wgTW ^if?^ 3ii^i SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITtNKBR DIWAKER 09.04.2010 Shri Ratan Pusty, counsel foi Heard. The present petition hasj Cr.M.P. No. 27/2010 which prosecution on 4.3.2010. Counsel for fhe applicant| could not appear because he co|ald ia fhe cause list This appUcation is not o^ipo State. The appUcation for resto^ which has been disniissed for w4 is aUowed. Accordingly, Cr.M.P. Noj origmal number. <=M<ilCT-4li tTTO?ff if fecef <{<(R^R ^affinsn^M the applicant. been filed for restoration of was disnussed for want of submits that on 4.3.2010, he not property trace the case ^iposed by fhe couasel for fhe tation of Cr.M.P. No. 27/2010 jiat ofprosecution on 4.03.2010 27/2010 is restored to its SdA - Pritinker Diwakar Judge