IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARHI WRIT PETITION No.34dr5 12004 PETITIONER Naresh Kumar Baghel aged about 26 years S/o Late Ayaturam, R/o Villags Narayanpur (Nchrunagar), Thana Bhanupratappur, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS 2f RESPONDENTS 1. Chhattisgarh Raj Van Vikas Nigam Ltd., Through the Managing Director, Raipur 2. The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Raj Van Vikas Nigam Ltd.,Raipur 3. Regiona1 General Manager C.G. Van Vikas Nigam, Raipur 4. Divisional Manager, Antagarh Project Division Bhanupratappur, Distt. Kanker WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTI$GARH : BILASPUR $!NGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRL J. WM WRIT PETITION 110.3445 OF 2004 Patitionar : Nam-.311 Kumar Baghel VCI’S 11S Resgondents Chhattisgarh Raj Van Vikas Nigam Ltd. and others Present : Mr, Patag Kotecha, counsel for the petitioner‘ Mr. Sameer Behar, counsel for mspondents No.1, 2 and 3. Nono for respondont No.4. ORAL GRDER (24th April, 2006; The petitiollafs father Shri Ayaturam diod on 23-5-2000 in harness while working as Jeep Driver in Antagarh Projnct of respondent — Van Vikas Njgam Limited. The mother of the petitioner, namely, Sukhmati Bai Baghel, being dependent-legal heir of the deceased employee, made an application for appoimment of the petitioner on compassionate gmund on 9-6-2000. On 20—2~2001, the respondent No.4 recommended the name of the petitioner for compassionate appointment to the respondent No.2 vide Annexure P/3. The said application is still pending co‘nsideration before the respondents. 2. The Government of Chhattisgarh, by its circular dated 2- 2-20Q6, has directed all the departments to consider cases of all the eligible dep€nda11t-legal heir of the employees, wha died in harness betwaen 1 — 1 1 — 19§7 to 3 l- 10~2000 for campassionate appointment. 3. Accordingly, the. respond€uts are dimcted to considEr the case of the 13€titioner as per Government’s circular dated 2-2—2006 and also in View of the order dated 20-12-2005 passed by this Couxt in Wn't Petition No.1322/2002 Emd other connected matters on its own men't, in accordance. with law, on such represemation being filed by the ‘petitioiler. \ 4. For the leasong stated above, the Wiit petition stands disposed of, NO Older as to costs. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotn" Judge