IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-19636 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:10.08.2011 Ankit Thakur alias Ansu . . .Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another . . . Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Saurabh Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.A.S.Rai, DAG, Punjab. Mr.Surender Sharma, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions received from ASI Balwinder Singh, accepts the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner and also submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation. At this stage, learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that still the passport has not been recovered but counsel for the petitioner submits that the passport is not in his possession. Without observing on merits, the order dated 22.7.2011 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein. Petition is disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) AUGUST 10, 2011 JUDGE Vivek