IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12227 of 2010 Bhogendra Mandal, son of Chingi Mahto, resident of Village- Veena, P.S. & District- Supaul……….Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ………………………..Opposite Party. For the petitioner :- Mr. Vikramdeo Singh, Advocate. For the State :- Mr. R. B. Roy ‘Raman’, A.P.P. ----------- 2. 06. 05. 2010. Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution for offences under Sections 366 and 494 of the Indian Penal Code, accused Ajay Kumar Mandal, son of this petitioner is alleged to have kidnapped the wife of the informant and he is alleged to have developed illicit relationship with the alleged victim. The petitioner and his wife are said to have abetted the crime in question. During the course of investigation, the alleged victim Meena Devi was recovered and her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was recorded by the learned Magistrate. The aforesaid statement has been brought on record as Annexure-3 by filing a supplementary affidavit today in the Court. In her statement the alleged victim Meena Devi has denied the entire prosecution allegation and has stated that she had voluntarily gone to Ludhiana and was working there in a factory. The allegation of her illicit relationship with co-accused Ajay Kumar Mandal and solemnization of her marriage with him has also been denied by her. According to the alleged victim, the petitioner is nowhere connected with the commission of crime in question. 2 In the aforesaid background, in the event of his arrest/surrender in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 311/09 within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, namely, Bhogendra Mandal, shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. m.p. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)