IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7747 of 2011 Bihar College of Teacher Education Samanpura Road No.1, Raja Bazar, Bailey Road, Patna-14 through its Secretary, Asif Ali Khan-------------------------------------------Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India through its Secretary, Human Resource Department, Govt. of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi 2. National council for Teacher Education through its Chairman, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 3. National Council for Teachers Education, Eastern Regional Committee ( Statutory Body of Govt. of India) 15, Nilkantha Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar, though its Regional Director 4. Regional Director, National council for Teacher Education, Eastern Regional Committee 15, Nilkantha Nagar Nayapalli, Bhubaneshwar 5. Magadh University, Bodhgaya ,through its vice Chancellor 6. The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodhgaya 7. The Registrar, Magadh University Bodhgaya, ------------ ----------------------------------------------------Respondents ---------------------------------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Bibhuti Pandey, Sr. Advocate & Mr. Mr. Jannath Singh, Advocate For the U.C.T.E: Mr. S.N Pathak, Sr. SCCG For M. University: Mr. Hansraj, Advocate ------------------------ 3 17.10.2011 Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for National Council for Teachers Education and the University. After the earlier round of argument made in regard to initial objection raised by the respondents the matter has finally come for limited issue which would be evident from perusal of annexure-11 dated 5th October, 2011. A clarification which has been sought by Eastern Regional Director is listed as (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv). In addition to that even paragraph 4 has some significance. Prima facie the Court of the opinion that these are small issues which are now to be clarified. All other major objections stand 2 dropped against the petitioner. In view of the current development and taking cue from communication contained in annexure-11 the petitioner is permitted to respond and clarify all these issues by 31st of October, 2011. Since the matter is being taken up by this Court now and is being disposed of, the earlier time frame fixed in the letter dated 3rd October, 2011 would be deemed to have been extended till 31st of October, 2011. The respondents are hereby now directed to take a final decision based on the clarification and not raise frivolous objection on the issue so that final decision may be taken. This writ application is disposed of with the above observation. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)