IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21472 of 2009 RAVI RANJAN MISHRA @ TANZI MISHRA @ RAJIV RANJAN MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.6.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under Section 395of the Indian Penal Code. . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the informant himself has stated vide Annexure-2 that he knows the petitioner and he was not one of the accused. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that the petitioner has been implicated only on the basis of confessional statement of one of the co- accused person although he has got no criminal antecedent. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. In case of surrender/arrest within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in the court below, petitioner, namely, Ravi Ranjan Mishra @ Tanzi Mishra @ Rajiv Ranjan Mishra shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri B.N.Mishra, Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Piro P.S.case No.73 of 2008 (Tr.No.3166 of 2008) - 2 - subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Narendra/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )