IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.281 of 2011 SHEO KUMAR PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 16.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is the rightful owner and possession of the land in question, however, the respondent no. 7 unauthorizedly trying to claim the land in question. It is submitted that petitioner requested the respondent no. 6 for taking action. However, no action has been taken as yet. Learned counsel for the State submits that the criminal writ jurisdiction is not an appropriate forum with regard to the rival claim of the petitioner and the respondent no. 7 with respect to the land in question. Considering the rival submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter. However, it will be open for the petitioner to take recourse of law with respect to the claim of title and possession of the land in question. If respondent no.7 commits any offence, the same would be looked into by the respondent no. 6 on being informed accordingly. Accordingly, the writ application stands disposed of. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)