IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52362 of 2008 SUNIL JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 16.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the story set up against the petitioner is not believable as three appointment letters were issued which were found forged. Even then he came to the informant for further demand of money for the same act. In any case, if service is purchased then equal liability lies upon both, the purchaser and the seller, and basing the statement of accomplice the petitioner’s further incarceration is not justified. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of N.K. Tiwary, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Katihar in connection with G.R. no. 2264 of 2008 arising out of Kadwa P.S. Case no. 205 of 2008. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)