WP(C) 6434/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA Heard Mr. Z. Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. B.J. Ghosh, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 3. Also heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for Fishery Development Corporation who appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that there was an agreement with the responde nt No. 2 to settle the Rowa Bill under Dhubri Sub-Division in the District of Dh ubri, Assam with an amount of Rs. 1,37,001/-(Rupees one lakh thirty seven thous and and one) only as revenue per year for a period of 7 years since 2007-08 to 2 013-14 i.e. till 31.03.2014 with total amount of Rs. 9,59,007/-. In the 1st year the petitioner had deposited Rs. 1,37,001/- as the revenue for the Rowa Beel in terms of the letter/order dated 23.11.2007 to the respondent No .2 and the said sum, according to the petitioner is access to what should have been paid. The said excess amount had not been refunded to the petitioner by the respondent No. 2 as yet. It appears that the petitioner had filed one representation demanding adjustment of the excess money with the instalment due for the year 2011-12 or to extend t he time of the lease period for adjustment to the Commissioner and Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Fishery Department but the respondent No. 1 did not take any decision as yet. It appears that the fishery area is owned and controlled by the respondent No.2 and the respondent No. 1 and 3 do not have any role in this matter. Therefore, t he representation as made and as available in Annexure-3 to the writ petition is misdirected and is not supposed to fetch any response from the authority concer ned to whom it was addressed. However, considering the entire aspects, the petitioner is asked to make a fresh representation to the respondent No. 2 claiming similar adjustment and in turn the respondent No. 2 shall consider the representation within a period of 1 (one ) month from the date of receipt of the representation. At the time of submittin g the representation to the respondent No. 2, the petitioner shall also furnish a copy of this order. Until disposal of the representation as might be filed by the petitioner, the fi shery area under reference shall not be settled. With the above observation and direction this writ petition is disposed of.