1 Amk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 7 OF 2009 IN FERA APPEAL NO. 34 OF 2009 Kaushik K. Kanakia .. Petitioner Vs. The Special Director of Enforcement .. Respondent Mr. Anil Balani for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Rao for the respondent. CORAM : F. I. REBELLO J. H. BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 9th October, 2009. P.C. The petitioner/original appellant has moved this Court for review of the order dated 18th June, 2009. It is the submission of learned Counsel for the petitioner that, after this matter was disposed of, he had come across an order of this Court admitting the appeal. The Appeal was filed under the provisions of the FERA. We do not propose to consider whether in the circumstance of the case, review under the provisions of the FERA can be invoked or not. We proceed on the footing that the review jurisdiction could be invoked. 2. In the instant case, from the order dated 18th June, 2009 it would be 2 clear that the matter was decided on the facts of the case. This is not a case of discovery of new material or evidence. Merely because another bench has admitted an appeal, by itself would not be a ground for review even assuming that review jurisdiction can be invoked and consequently the present Review Petition is rejected. (J. H. BHATIA, J.) (F. I. REBELLO, J.)