IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2879 of 2007 Priti Kumari, aged about 23 years, Daughter of Shri Arjun Singh, Resident of Village at Terha,s Police Station Isuapur, in the District of Saran at Chapra. ------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Human Resources Development Depatment, Bihar, Patna. 3. Director, Madhymik Shiksha Bihar, Patna. 4. Commissioner, Saran Commissionery. 5. District Magistrate, Saran. 6. District Education of Superintendent, Saran. 7. District Education Officer, Saran. 8. Block Development Officer, Isuapur, Saran. 9. Block Education Extension Officer, Isuapur, Saran. 10. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Nipuniya, Isuapur, Saran. 11. Gram Secretary, Nipunia Panchayat, Isuapur, Saran. ----- Respondents ----------- 2 01.10.2010 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Counsel for the State is present and would point out that the following relief of the petitioner:- “1. That this is an application for issuance of appropriate writ/writs or direction or directions commanding the respondents to consider her case for her appointment as Panchayat Sikshak in Nipaniya Panchayat under Isuapur Block District Saran since the petitioner’s claim for such appointment has been ignored for the purpose of accommodating/appointing the others who have much lesser works then this Petitioner.” is not capable of being answered, inasmuch as, there is no specific averment of 2 discrimination in the writ application. In the opinion of this Court, when the petitioner has not moved the District Teachers Appellate Authority, any complaint in this regard, at the first instance, has to be filed by the petitioner only before such authority. That being so, this application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file his complaint in respect of grievance made in this writ application before the concerned District Teachers Appellate Authority, which shall dispose of the complaint of the petitioner on merit without going into the question of delay after hearing the petitioner and any other person, who may become adversely effected on account of such decision of the authority. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is disposed of. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)