m Ci^-^?%§.3"*' ^T-aS:1 ^^ M°5 N ' S-" ^ 't^M^ w-sv'.as^s.. Qt.fi^ff m THE mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.S.No. • / '^~7 4 /2007 PETITIONER ^y^ Lo..^.^\ \.^'&'..--'v,\f.--''r /%v y.^" ^ ,/ .;.(. _..• ^ •w Smt. Shanta Xess, S/o Mino Xess aged about 38 years, working as L.D.T. Govt. girl Priamary school, Rajput para, (Kudekela),blpck- Dharamjaigarh Dist- Raigarh ( C.G.) K^ ^^ '<^ ^s-~ VERSUS RESPONDENT: .'•» c^'-^ •to;.G.^^Tff > State ofC.G. Through. Secretary, Dipartment of School Education, Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur ( C.G.) Asst. Commissioner, Raigarh Distt. Raigarh ( C.G.) Commissioner, Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF )IA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRLATE WRITS OF MANDA- iftUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS DIRECTIONS :- <£>.; HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISQARH, BSLASPUR Petitioner RESPOSgBEHTS •O. ia if- 2. Smt. Shanta Xess w/o Mino Xess aged about 38 years, workuie as LDT, Govt, Girls Pnmai'v Sehool, Rajput Para^Kudckcla), BIock DharaBiiaigarh, District Raigarh \n\ '\Jtf State of Cbhattisgarh, Throiigh: Secretaiy, Departulent of Education MantraSaya, DKS Bhawau., Raipur (CG) Asst. Coirimissjoner, Raigarh, District Raigarh(CG) Gimmissioner, Raigarti, Districf Raigarh(CG) 1 ;G?iSTITUTION OF IKDL Shri Amit Kumar Shamia, c'oiinsel for the petitioner. Shri Yastawant Singh, G.A. for the State on advance copy. (27.8.2007) £a<a»1^» Heard on adaiission. I^eamed coiinsel for the petitioner siinmits that the petitioner bas nasserl B.T.I. Rxaminatjon on her own exijenses, thei'efore; slie is entitied to ifceive two arSvance increnieDte accoi-ding to circiilars dated 24.12.1<398 and 01.03 1999. He also sulimits th.at in inany identical mattRi-s; tfce petitions have. been allowed m teniis of the order passed in the case of YashUHUlt cmather t3006 fJS JgPJR-CG 96S. He suhmrts tbat the case ofthe petitioner is sqiiarely covened by the sairt judgTRent Tnis legal position is not disputed by leamcr! coiinsel fbr tlie State. However, he siihniits that the oiTler may he passed in teiTiis WP(s) 1374/2007 of the said jndginent, biit it sba11 be siiTijected to vei-ification regatdiug netitionei-'s siich qiaalification. Accoi-dingty, this writ petition is aflowed in tcmis of the order passed in case of Yfjshvia.nt Kumar Bharadjfiaj Vs. M-anidpal Corporation, Diirg and anof.herlsiipra) siibject to werification of the facts as to whefter the. petitioner had acquu'ed B.T.1. Rxamuiation tertificate on his own expenses as ner circiilars datp.si 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and fiirthp.r whether she has heen naid two advance inci-RTOents or not. Tbe netition stands finallv riisnosed o£ No oiiler as to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge sunita