IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2008 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 19829 of 2004(I) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- SREEKUMAR M., AGED 38 S/O.MUKUNDAN NAIR, MEANAIPURATHU HOUSE, NEERIKAD P.O., AYARKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. P. RAVINDRA BABU RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD., PANAMPILLY AVENUE, PANAMPILLY NAGAR P.O., COCHIN - 682036, REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR DIVISIONAL RETAIL SALES MANAGER. 2. RAJAN GEORGE, KELAMPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHERTALA P.O., ALAPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. E.K. NANDAKUMAR SRI. A.K. JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR SMT. PRIYA MAHESH SMT. PRIYA MANJOORAN SRI. K. JAJU BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 19829/2004 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT. P1 : COPY OF THE ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR RETAIL OUTLET DEALERSHIP DT. 19.2.04. EXT. P2 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION DT. 18.3.04. OF THE PETITIONER. EXT. P3 : COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT. 3.6.04. EXT. P4 : COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPTS. EXT. P5 : COPY OF THE CONSENT LETTER ISSUED BY SMT. J. LEELAMMA DT. 9.3.04. EXT. P6 : COPIES OF THE FD RECEIPTS AND BANK STATEMENTS. EXT. P7 : COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE SBT THIRUVANCHOOR DT. 9.3.04. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT. R1(a) : COPY OF THE LETTER OF INDENT ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 20.9.2004. EXT. R1(b) : COPY OF THE COMPREHENSIVE MARKS SHEETS OF CANDIDATES WHO HAD PARTICIPATED IN THE SELECTION FOR THE LOCATIONS THRIKKAKARA HELD ON 21.06.2004. EXT. R1(c) : COPY OF THE COMPREHENSIVE MARKS SHEETS OF CANDIDATES WHO HAD PARTICIPATED IN THE SELECTION FOR THE LOCATIONS ETTUMANOOR HELD ON 23.06.2004. // True Copy // P.A. to Judge. smp KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). No.19829 OF 2004 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of April, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved by the grant of Retail Outlet Dealership to the second respondent. Since the petitioner has an alternate remedy by way of complaint before the first respondent, this writ petition is disposed of without prejudice to the liberty as above. In case such a complaint is filed, the matter will be duly considered by the first respondent with notice to the petitioner and the second respondent. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. ps KURIAN JOSEPH, J. W.P.(C). No.19829 OF 2004 J U D G M E N T 11.04.2008