HI6H_£OURT_OF CHHAmS6ARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HOt<BLESHRI JA6&I5HBHALLA. Ag. CJ. & HON'BLE SHRIbILIPRAOSAHEB DESHMUKH, J. APPELLANT RESPQNOENTS_ Writ Appeal O'RTNo. 2631 of 2007 : ttanaharan Lal bewangan, S/o. Shpi Bhuwan Lal bewanggn, aged about 38 years, R/o. Village & P.0. Saniyari, &i3trictBiiaspuF(C.6.) VERSUS 1. StaTe of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Department of Higher Educstion, &.K.S. Bhawan,, teantralaya, RaipurCG.e.). 2.. Commisslorier, t>irectorate of Hjgher Educatipn, D.K.S; Bhawan, antralaya, Raipur((;.5.) 3. Additional tiirector, Higher Education, ,,^. .RaipuT & Bagtar^Division, Raipur (C.6.) f 4. Principal, 6oyt.College LalbahadurNagar, Distt.RaJnQRdgaon (C.6.) Wrlt Appeal under Section 2(1) of theChhattisaarh HiQhCourt (Appeal to &ivision Benchl Act, 2006 Presenti Shri Ashish Shrivastava.counselforTheappellant. Shri N.K. Agrawal, Oeputy Advocate Seneral for The State. \.'\ ORALOROER (Passedon 16*l'July. 2007) The following orcl order of the Court was passed by Jagdish Bhaila. Ag. C.J. The repressntation of the appellant / petitioner has been decided by the 51'ate ©overnmentby or-der dated 03-07-2007. C.dpy of the same placed before us by Shri N.K. Agrawai, beputy Advocate (Seneral. This Court ', being Court of record, the order referred above is taken on record. has been :-"^ -K® ^ijbbt] "37. In tight of the order pdssed by the^State Sovernment dated 03-07-2007, learned coynselfor the appelianf does not want to pregs this appeal and prays for liberty to challenge the order deciding the representation of the petitioner. Accordingly, the.writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. However, it woyld be open for thapeTitioner to challenge theorder dated 03-07-2007 if he so dssires. Sd/- ^ Ag.Chief Justice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge p==="- l. w