IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT APPEAL NO : 1022 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 28/01/2008 in WP NO : 1083 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 Nethikunta Anjaiah S/o.Rajaiah R/o.Karimnagar 2 P.Srinivas S/o.Narayana R/o.H.No.8-5-212, Laxminagar Karimnagar ..... APPELLANT(S) AND 1 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad rep.by its Registrar ,Management,High Courtof Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad 2 The Principal District and Sessions Judge Karimnagar .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.C.RAMESH SAGAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: (SC FOR APHC)D.V.SITHARAM MURTHY The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT APPEAL NO : 1022 of 2008 JUDGMENT: (Per Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard the learned counsel for appellant Mr C Ramesh Sagar and learned Standing Counsel for ﬁrst respondent Mr D V Sitarama Murthy and at their request the appeal is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. The appellants are unsuccessful writ petitioners who sought for writ of mandamus inter-alia seeking for renewal of the licenses which have been granted in their favour in the Court premises of the second respondent. The learned single Judge having found that the appellants have no enforceable right having regard to the circular issued by the High Court of A.P. dated 18.6.2007 dismissed the writ petition. Hence, the present appeal. Having heard the learned counsel on either side and on perusal of the material available on record, we are in entire agreement with the reasoning given by the learned Single Judge that the appellants have no enforceable right. However, Mr.D.V.Sirarama Murthy, learned Standing Counsel for ﬁrst respondent submits that the aforesaid circular dated 18.6.2008 has been rescinded and circular in ROC No.499/06-DII (B) dated 8.8.2008 was passed with certain modiﬁcations and in terms of the said circular the appellants can submit their applications to the second respondent. Taking note of the circular dated 8.8.2008, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the appeal permitting the appellants to submit representations in terms of circular dated 8.8.2008 to the second respondent seeking necessary relief, which shall be considered on its own merits and disposed of in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ appeal is disposed of. No costs. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO,J _______________ G. CHANDRAIAH,J DATE:17/9/2008 T VK THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT APPEAL NO : 1022 of 2008 Date: 17.09.2008