IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 23RD JANUARY 2009 / 3RD MAGHA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1730 of 2008(S) --------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/IN WPC.20323/2008 Dated 23/07/2008 .................... PETITIONER(S): -------------------- A.CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.OAPPUKUTTAN NAIR, 16, AMBADY, N.P.P. NAGAR, PEROORKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------- MR.JOHNSON K.GEORGE, AGED 56 YEARS, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) PRESENTLY WORKING AS THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON (SR.) SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR, SC, TVM CORPORATION THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== Cont.Case(C) NO. 1730 OF 2008 (S) ====================== Dated this the 23rd day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T Though belatedly, in compliance with the direction in the judgment in WP(C) No20323/08, an order has been passed and now the complaint is regarding the illegality of the order. 2. Now that the judgment has been complied with, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the order, the petitioner has to seek appropriate remedy against the order dated 05/12/2008. Therefore, without expressing anything on the merits of the contentions raised by both sides, the contempt of court case is closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedies. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp