IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 25 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2010 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO 7545 OF 2009 BETWEEN MR CHETAN P TAYAL S/O LATE N K TAYAL AGED 57 YEARS R/O NO.205, SALEH ARCADE LEONARD LANE, RICHMOND TOWN BANGALORE-25 APPELLANT (By Sri.V LAKSHMINARAYANA, ADVOCATE) AND SRI S PRASANNA KUMAR 5/0 SIDDAIAH MAJOR 2. SRISPRASAD S/O SIDDAIAH BOTH ARE R/A LINGABOHI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI MYSORE TQ AND DIST RESPONDENTS cO T P@rr c ) ,n MFA NO.7545/09 MFA filed U/O. 43 RULE 1(r) of CPC against the order dt. 2.7.2009 passed on I.A.NO.1 in O.S.NO. 907/2008 on the file of the PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN), MYSORE, rejecting the IA filed U/O. 39 rules 1 and 2 of CPC for T.I. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following: ORDER Heard, The respondents shall not alienate the plaint schedule property in the suit in O.S.No.907/2008 pending before the court of the I Additional Civil Judge, Mysore till further orders. The appellant is permitted to serve the respondents through their counsel before the trial court in addition to taking out notice through the process of court. Needful in three weeks failing which the appeal stands dismissed. List immediately after service of notice. Sd/ JUDGE T By: SL R By: —4 CBy: CO sstsf(p ?ejstrar .{ig:i ccu. fKamataka Lc. I 1. —