s. '^.? ^^ /SAA; HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH Coram : HON'BLE SHRi RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J.& HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. APPELLANT Petitioner RESPONDENTS Writ Appeal No.150 of 2009 Mohd Akhtar Khan S/o Akbar Hussein Khan Aged about 66 years, Ward No.25, Kasai Para, Rajnandgaon (CG) Versus 1 State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Urban Administration & Welfare Department, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (CG) 2 Municipal Corporation, Through Commissioner, Munlcipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon (CG) 3 President, Municipat Corporation, Rajnandgaon (CG) Writ Appeal under Section 2(1 1 of the Hiah Court of Chhattisaarh ADpea! to Division Bench ActZOOS R/w Rute 157 (10) ofthe Hiah Court Rules. 2005 Present: Shri Anup l\tejumdar, counsel for the appellant. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, learned Deputy A.G. forthe State/ respondent No.1. Judgment (18th June, 2009) The following judgment of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: Learned counsel for the parties are heard on admisston. 2). AppellanV petitioner Mohd. Akhtar Khan has fited this writ appeal against the impugned order dated 04.05.2009, passed in W.P.C. No.2294/2009. l4-y i?yr" 3). The appellant/ petitioner in the writ petition was seeking a direction to the respondents to pay a sum of Rs.40,500/- against his bills for the use of his vehicte as Taxi in the year 2000. 4). The appellant's/ petitioner's entire claim in the writ petition was based on the alteged breach of the contractuai obtigatlons by respondents No. 2 and 3. Learned Single Judge, therefore, declined to entertain the writ petition in exerclse of the discretionary jurisdiction under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India. 5). On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, we do not find any infirmity in the impugned order which may warrant interference in this writ appeal. 6). The writ appeal, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. Sd/- ChiefJusticF Sd/- S SunU Kumar Sinha B :' , Judge Subbu