IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23810 of 2011 Mantoo Giri @ Mantu Giri @ Purushotam Giri Versus The State Of Bihar 3. 10.08.2011. Heard Mr. Ganesh Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.M.P. Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Sahar P.S. Case No. 63 of 2008 on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 24.12.2008 and the case has still not been committed to the court of sessions. The report of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Ara(Bhojpur), dated 28.07.2011 reflects the reason for non commitment the case of the petitioner after 20.06.2011 when the learned court below joined. The learned court below is supposed to transmit the report for entire period after cognizance as why the case has not been committed. Let the learned court below expedite the commitment of the case since the petitioner is alleged to be assailant. This Court is not inclined to revise the earlier order. However, if the 2 trial is not concluded within nine months, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. With the above observation, the bail application of petitioner is rejected. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)