IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.Misc.-M No.19017 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: December 01, 2011. Karam Chand and others. ........Petitioners. Versus State of Punjab and another. .......Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar, Advocate, for Shri Manish Kumar Singla, Advocate, for the petitioners. Shri B.B.S.Teji, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. RAJESH BINDAL, J As per office report service of respondent No.2 is complete. In the order dated June 20, 2011, the following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioners were noticed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in the alleged occurrence, which took place on 25.5.1989, the complaint was filed in the court for the first time in April, 2008 in which the petitioners have been summoned through non-bailable warrants. The allegations are of impersonation in a sale deed. He further submitted that a civil suit filed by the complainant challenging the sale deed was dismissed in default on 24.10.1991, which was never got restored”. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in terms of the order passed by this Court, the petitioners have already put in appearance before the court below and submitted their bail bonds. No one has put in appearance for respondent No.2, -2- Crl.Misc.-M No. 19017 of 2011 complainant. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions noticed above, the interim bail granted to the petitioners on June 20, 2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. December 01, 2011 (Rajesh Bindal) Malik Judge