IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.31733 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 07, 2011 Shinder Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Manvinder Singh Bal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Only claim of the petitioner is that she was an eye-witness to the crime. The petitioner apparently does not have any locus to file this petition. Obviously, there would be person aggrieved, who can approach the court. If any stranger, like alleged witnesses is allowed to invoke jurisdiction of the court, then it may lead to some serious consequences for seeking an investigation in motion in some case without much basis. If the petitioner is so interested in assisting the law, she may approach the Court in accordance with law as laid down in Sakiri Vasu Versus State of U.P. and others, 2008(1) RCR (Criminal) 392. Dismissed. November 07, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE