Crl. Revision No. 50 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Revision No. 50 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.01.2011. Darshan Singh and another .......Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh. 1. Whether the reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Ms. Baljit Mann, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... Alok Singh, J. (Oral). The present revision petition has been filed for setting aside the order dated 21.12.2010, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana thereby summoning the revisionist father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased as additional accused under section 319 Cr.P.C. in SC Trial No. 9/30.8.2010 in a case under section 304-B/34 IPC. From the perusal of the record it transpires that marriage of the deceased was held on 1.2.2010 with Yadhvir Singh son of the revisionist. The deceased was found dead in her matrimonial house on 25.4.2010. The FIR was lodged by the complainant, brother of the deceased on 25.4.2010 itself, clearly Crl. Revision No. 50 of 2011 -2- mentioning therein that her husband, father-in-law and mother in law kept on harassing her for dowry. However, after investigation, challan was presented only against the husband. During the trial, the complainant has appeared as prosecution witness and has stated on oath that the deceased was being harassed for dowry by her husband, father-in-law and mother- in-law. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE January 10, 2011 gurpreet