Petitiorser Respondente HiQH GOURT OF CHHATTISQARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition iS} No. 3S69 of 2008 B.K. Pradhan, S/o. iate Shri Pavitra Pradhan, aged about 52 years; Acoountant, Blook Eduoation Office, Basna, R/a. Basna, •Tshsjl Basna, Distrid: Mahasamund (CG). Versus 1) State of Chhatti^arh, through Secretary, Schoo! Eduoation, Department Government of Chhattlsgarh, DKS Bhavan, ManSralaya, Rajpur (CG). 2) Director, Pubijc Educatlon Chh^tisgarh, Raipur (CG). . 3) District Education Officer, Mahasamund (CG). I'Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Conststution of India) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present Shn K.A. Ansari, Sr. ^Jvocate wlth Shri yipln Slngh, counse! fbr the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advooate Generai for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 17th day ofJuly, 2008) With consent of iearned counsel appearing for botn tne parties, the matterjs heard finaily. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitloner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petltion on merits, at this stage. However, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the concemed authorities vvithin a period of three days and the same may be directed to be deoided, in accordance with ia'w, within tne prescribed time. 3) Shri Y.S. Thakur, learned DeputyAdvocateGenerai appearing for the State submits that if the representation is made, the same shali be oonsidered and decided by the concerned authority, in acccrdance with law, on Its own merits, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 4) in vlew of tne foregoing, nothing sumves in the matter. Mr. Thakur further submits that no coercive steps shail be taken agasnst the petitioner, tiij thedisposai ofthe representation. 5) Accordingiy, the petition Is disposed of. No order as to oosts. raju Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge ^^ffSiiSsiK.iiS^