IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 10248 of 2004 Between: 1 Smt. B.E. Sunitha W/o. B.V. Emmanuel, 11th Ward,R/o. H.No. 5-128, Jawahar Nagar, village, Grampanchayat, Shamirpet Mandal, R.R.District. 2 Mr. V.Rama Rao S/o. Sri Rama Murthy, Ward No.5, H.No. 2-959, Jawahar Nagar, Village &Gram- Panchayat, Shamirpet Mandal, R.R.Dist. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The District Collector, R.R.District, Khairatabad, Hyd. 2 The District Panchayat Officer, Khairatabad, Hyd, R.R.District. 3 The Commissioner, Panchayatraj, Govt of A.P., Himayatnagar, Hyd. 4 Sri. K. Shankar Goud, S/o. K. Yadaiahgoud, Jawahar Nagar GP.,. Shamirpet Mandal, R.R.Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate nature of writ of Mandamus; i) declaring the inaction of the respondents in taking appropriate action against the respondent No.4. The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayt, Shamirpet Mandal, R.R.District and for not removing the Sarpanch from the Office of Gram Panchayat, Jawahar Nagar, Gram Panchayat, Shamirpet Mandal, R.R.District and direct the respondent No.1 and 2 to recover the sum of Rs. 35,53,531-00 from the respondent No.4 or otherwise attaching the properties of respondent No.4. For the Petitioner:MR.G.YADAGIRI For the Respondent No.: ASSISTANT GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court Made the Following : Oral order: It is the case of the petitioners that though they made several representations to respondent Nos. 1 to 3 against respondent No.4- Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Jawaharnagar, alleging abuse of his office and misappropriation of funds running into several lakhs, neither any action has been taken thereon nor any enquiry has been initiated against him nor any steps taken to recover the said monies from him. Hence, they filed the present writ petition. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj on instructions submits that respondents have already initiated an enquiry against respondent No.4, and as such, no further orders need be passed in the writ petition. Inasmuch as it is stated that respondents have already initiated against respondent No.4, no further orders need be passed in the writ petition, and the same is accordingly closed. No costs. ____________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: June 23, 2004. KSR/VS To 1 The District Collector, R.R.District, Khairatabad, Hyd. 2 The District Panchayat Officer, Khairatabad, Hyd, R.R.District. 3 The Commissioner, Panchayatraj, Govt of A.P., Himayatnagar, Hyd. 4 2 CCs copies to the Assistant GP for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development, High court Buildings (O.U.T). 5 2 CD copies. 6 One spare copy. THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 10248 of 2004 Dated: 23-06-2004