Criminal Writ Petition No. 1961 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Writ Petition No. 1961 of 2011 Date of Decision: 17.10.2011 Angoori Devi ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: By Post. Mr. Anupam Sharma, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) A telegram was received from Angoori Devi by the Registry of this Court and the same has been treated as a Criminal Writ Petition. It is stated therein that petitioner's son namely, Rattanpal and son-in-law Kalia son of Fateh Singh were forcibly taken away by the Station House Officer, Police Station Sadar, Dabwali. Today, a reply has been filed on behalf of the State by Rattan Singh, Sub Inspector/Station House Officer, Police Station Sadar, Dabwali, by way of his affidavit. The same is taken on record. It is stated therein that similar allegations were the subject matter of Criminal Writ Petition No. 1763 of 2011 wherein the Warrant Officer had visited the Police Station. Learned counsel for the State has also placed on Criminal Writ Petition No. 1961 of 2011 2 record true copy of the order passed in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1763 of 2011, decided on 27.9.2011 by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. The order, passed in the above said writ petition, reads as under:- “...Report of Warrant Officer has been received and perused. Out of alleged four detenues, one Sukhwinder was found sitting in Police Station Sadar, Dabwali. He had been called in connection with investigation of FIR No. 175 dated 26.07.2011 under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, registered against unknown persons. Entry of calling of Sukhwinder Singh to the Police Station was found in the Daily Diary vide DDR No. 14 dated 11.09.2011. Remaining three alleged detenues were not found in the said Police Station or in the Police Station City Dabwali, as got searched by the petitioner. No other place was sought to be searched by the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid, the instant Habeas Corpus writ petition is disposed of...” In view of the disposal of Criminal Writ Petition No. 1763 of 2011, the present writ petition being subsequent petition, on the same allegations, cannot be entertained and the same is hereby dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge October 17, 2011 “DK”