IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2007 / 12TH CHAITHRA 1929 RP.No. 363 of 2007(D) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.6545/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN WP: -------------------------------------- 1. SELVARAJ @ SELVAN, T.L.12/121, BANDU HOUSE, PATTOM P.O. TRIVANDRUM. 2. JOSEPH JOHN, KOPPIVILAKOM, T.C. 11/VI, PLAMOODU, PATTOM P.O., TRIVANDRUM. 3. D. ANDREWS, THEKKUMMOODU, THOTTUVARAMBIL VEEDU, PLAMOODU, TRIVANDRUM. 4. VIJAYAN, V. MUKLAVANA PERAYIL VEEDU, KUNNUKUZHI PO, TRIVANDRUM. 5. L. VISWAMBHARAN, T.C. 11/447, POOCHEDIVILA VEEDU, PLAMOODU, PATTOM, TRIVANDRUM. 6. A. PRASANNAKUMAR, T.C. 12/427, -DO- 7. SUKUMARAN, S/O.LAKSHMANAN, THADATHARIKATHU VEEDU, VATTAPPARA P.O., TRIVANDRUM. 8. P. VINU, POOCHEDIVILA VEEDU, PLAMOODU, PATTOM, TRIVANDRUM. 9. P.S. NAIDU, SECRETARY, ALL KERALA HEAD LOAD WORKERS' UNION, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.S.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUSEUM, TRIVANDRUM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUSEUM, TRIVANDRUM. 3. ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER, IIIRD CIRCLE, TRIVANDRUM. 4. THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, TRIVANDRUM. 5. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 6. UNNIKRISHNAN, S/O. APPUKUTTAN, POOCHEDIVILA, PATTOM P.O., TRIVANDRUM. 7. UNNI, S/O. MANIYAPPAN, POOCHEDIVILA VEEDU, PLAMOODU, PATTOM, TRIVANDRUM. 8. RANDHEEV, S/O. RAJU, T.C. 12/447, POOCHEDIVILA VEEDU, PLAMOODU, PATTOM, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.RAM MOHAN.G. R1 TO 5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI P.A. SALIM THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/04/2007, ATHE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.B. KOSHY and T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ. ---------------------------- R.P.No.363 of 2007 in W.P.(C) No. 6545 of 2007 ---------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of April, 2007 Order Koshy, J. In the judgment under review dated 15.3.2007, we have specifically granted police protection for the work done by petitioners 1 to 9. Whether respondents 6 to 8 are entitled to work is a question to be considered after registration. We see no ground to review the judgment. Review petition is dismissed. J.B.KOSHY JUDGE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE vaa W.P.(C).No./2007 2 J.B. KOSHY AND T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ. -------------------------- R.P.No.363/2007 in W.P.(C) No.6545/2007 -------------------------- Order Dated:2nd April, 2007