IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9345 of 2008. Decided on: 16.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Anand Wardhan. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Pushpinder Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Mr. Pushpinder Verma, Advocate appearing vice Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous with the passage of time. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 16, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?