1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.2618 OF 1989 Central Bank of India. ..Plaintiff. V/s. M/s.Mark Industries & Ors. ..Defendants. None for the Plaintiff. Mr.F.Sayyed i/b.M.K.Ambalal for Plaintiff(discharged). CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : AUGUST 30, 2007. DATE : AUGUST 30, 2007. DATE : AUGUST 30, 2007. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Counsel Mr.Sayyed states that earlier he was appearing for the Plaintiff, however, has taken discharge. That does not mean that nobody should appear on behalf of the Plaintiff, when the matter is listed. The Plaintiff after giving discharge to the former advocate was expected to engage another advocate to espouse the cause. That is obviously not done. The former advocate has been discharged as back as in 2005. In the circumstances, the suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)