IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2817 of 2010 M/S C.P.Singh & Company Versus State of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 04. 03.08.2011 Counsel for the Corporation seems to be correct in stating that there is an impediment created by the order of a Division Bench in making payment to the petitioner at this stage. They have to await the outcome of the vigilance report on the count of the work of de-silting which has been carried out in the town of Patna, which also includes the work done by the petitioner. To that extent the order of this Court passed earlier on 7.1.2010 has to be read in harmony with the direction of the Division Bench because this aspect was not brought to the notice of the Court earlier. In view of the above, contempt application is dismissed. A direction is issued to the opposite parties that no sooner vigilance enquiry is completed and report submitted and if there is noting adverse against the present petitioner, they will have to take steps for payment of the rightful claim. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)