IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 22845 of 1995 Between: V.B.V. Laxmi Kumari, W/o. Purnachandra Rao, D.No.7/272, Jain Temple street, Gudivada, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent, Dr. Gururaj Government Homeo Hospital, D.No.9/77, Gudivada, Krishna district. 2 The Executive Engineer, R & B Division, Government of A.P. Machilipatnam, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to immediately effect revision of rent payable in respect of the petitioner's promises bearing D.No.9/77, Gudivada, Krishna district in the lease hold occupation of the 1st respondent with effect from 5.7.1994 as per G.O.Ms.No.269T (R&B) dt. 6.8.85 and Memo No.120/A/B1/1/83-7 dt. 26.11.84 of the Government of A.P. Pt. Roads and Buildings. (E-1) department and make the payment of the same regularly with effect from 5.7.94 along with interest at 18%p.a on all the arrears due up to date of such payment and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.PARABRAHMA SASTRI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri V.Parabrahmasastry, that during the pendency of this writ petition, there has been a substantial revision with regard to payment of rents and, therefore, no further cause survives in this writ petition requiring any further adjudication. However, if the petitioner has any further claim, it would be open for the petitioner to make an appropriate representation before the 2nd respondent, which shall duly be considered, in accordance with law, uninfluenced by disposal of this writ petition. The representation, if any, to be made by the petitioner may be considered by the 2nd respondent within eight (8) weeks from the date of making such representation. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of without any order as to costs. ___________ 31-1-2005 asp To: 1 The Superintendent, Dr. Gururaj Government Homeo Hospital, D.No.9/77, Gudivada, Krishna district. 2 The Executive Engineer, R & B Division, Government of A.P. Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 3.Two C.Cs. to the G.P. for Roads and Buildings, High Court Buildings (OUT) 4.Two C.D. copies