IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.366 of 1999 1. Jai Nandan Rai son of Sri Jamuna Rai, resident of village Madhopur Kurhani, District- Muzaffarpur. 2. Rajeshwar Ram, son of late Ram Ashish Ram resident of village Mirjapur, p.o. Sirisia via Kalyani, District Muzaffarpur 3.Suresh Mishra, son of Sri Jagadish Mishra village Sarmastipur, P.O, Chowk Sarmastipur, District Muzaffarpur 4.Sita Ram, son of Sri Ram Baran Ram, resident of village-Mirjapur, P.O. Sirisin, District-Muzaffarpur 5.Bishundeo Ram son of Jaggu Ram, resident of village Mankania, P.S.Paharpur, District- East Champaran.. …Petitioners.Appellants Versus 1.The State of Bihar 2.The secretary to Government, Department of Animal Husbandary, Government of Bihar, New Secretariate Bihar, Patna 3.The Director, Animal Husbandary, Government of Bihar, New Secretariate, Patna 4.The Regional Director, Animal Husbandary, North Bihar Range, District-Muzaffarpur... .Respondents.. 5.Subhash Chandra Choubey, son of Sri Hira Choubey,resident of Village-Tikulia, P.S.Govindganj, District-East Champaran, Motihari 6.Bishwanath Hazara son of Sri Ram Lall Hazara, resident of village & P.O. Bankat, District East Champaran 7. Pramod Kumar son of Makund Prasad Sah, resident of village Rajipur, P.O. Lauria, Via Areraj District- East Champaran 8.Kewal Kishore son of Sri Keshar Lall Das, resident of village & P.O. Simera, P.S. Jhanjharpur, District- Madhubani 9.Sanjiv Kumar Rai son of Sarju Prasad Rai, resident of village Ramdayalu Nagar, p.s. & District Muzaffarpur 2 10.Shahid Siddique son of Sri Syed Siddiqui, resident of Nayatola Ganj No.1, Bettiah, West champaran 11.Yugal Kishore Singh son of Raghunath Prasad Singh, resident of village- Rampur, parori, P.O. Bansnauri, District- Sitamarhi 12.Ashok Kumar son of Sri Ram Baran Rai, resident of village & P.O. Subahi, District- Hazipur, Vaishali (Petitioner_Appellants) ..Opposite Parties 4 03.12.2010 Heard Mr.Vindhyakeshri Kumar, Sr. Advocate, appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners by this review application seek certain correction in the final order dated 26.11.1999 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Letters Patent Appeal No.1139/97. By drawing our attention to the submissions made in Paragraph 4 of the Memorandum of Appeal, it has been shown that five of the appellants i.e. appellant Nos. 3,4,5,7 and 11, who are the five petitioners in this application, were holding Class IV posts under the Department of Animal Husbandry, Government of Bihar. So far as other appellants are concerned, they have been rightly treated to be Class III employees in the order under review but in respect of the petitioners i.e. appellant Nos.3,4,5,7 and 11, an apparent mistake has occurred and they have been erroneously treated as Class III employees. 3 Errors to that effect at various places in the order under review are corrected and it is made clear that the five petitioners whose services were also terminated along with the services of large number of persons appointed by the Regional Director, Animal Husbandry Department, were in the category of Class IV employees and not Class III employees. With this clarification and correction, the review application is disposed of because, on merits, the view as taken by the Division Bench does not permit for taking any other view in respect of the petitioners. Sanjay-II (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)