IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10809 of 2009 MANJAY KUMAR, Son of Raj Nandan Baitha, R/o Village – Hari Chapra, P.S. Dumra, District – Sitamarhi. ….. Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Home Department, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Patna Division, Police Selection Committee through the Superintendent of Police, Patna. 4. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur cum Chairman of Central Selection Board No. 1, Patna. ….. Respondents. With CWJC No.7905 of 2009 MANJAY KUMAR, S/o Raj Nandan Bhaitha, R/o Village – Hari Chapra, P.S. Dumra, District – Sitamarhi. ….. Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Home Department, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Patna Division, Police Selection Committee through Superintendent of Police, Patna. 4. The Chairman, Central Selection Board, Old Secretariat, Patna (C.M. Secretariat, Patna). …. Respondents. ----------- 02/ 27.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner was an applicant for the post of Constable in the light of the Advertisement No. 1/04. He having participated in the selection process secured 13 points but none of the candidates securing less than 14 points have been appointed in the Scheduled Caste/ Scheduled Tribes category. In the circumstances, petitioner has no case for issue of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider him for appointment against the remaining vacancies as the authorities have already decided not to appoint any person who has secured less than 14 points as which fact is evident from the decision contained in letter no.6006 dated 24.9.2008. - 2 - 3. In the circumstances, there is no merit in both the writ applications, which are dismissed. DKS/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)