H§éH C$URT 0? €H§-§A‘§”§"i§€§A§£H A”? $32Lf§SFU§Q singie gemh : How’bk $m~i $un§i Kmmar $3n’ha, J, Wm” Pefifion No. 144 of 23% Wri't Pe‘fifion under ArticEe 226/227 of The Consfi'hn‘ion of India §3resent : Sm? Fouzia Mina, counsai for ‘rhe petifionar. Shari Ajay SwSvadi, Fanei iowyer for fhe Sim‘e. CRRL QRQHQ (Paweo‘ or; $1” Navaamkef“, ZGGT) The pefi‘rioner: who was woridng as Assismm Teacher- and 1 refired during The pendency of #‘ne wri? pefi‘fion on 313T January, 2692’: has fi§e<i Th§s wrif pe‘ri‘rion chaiknging ‘Hde \$ Pei‘i?imer LP Paswan, 5/9 Shri Ramiagcn Faswan, Aged abau‘i' 61 years, 0ccupa?€c;1 ~ sarvice, presen+%y working as Ass§smnf Teacher, Primary Schooi Kami‘hi, Rio ‘y’iimge & PO Ehariupm‘rapgur, Dis’tric? Kanker (C6) Versus Respendsznk 1. Stan of Chha’rfisgarh Throug§1 z *{ke Sacra-wry, Depcrw‘rmen’r cf SC 5? Ofhev Sackwar-d Gass & 0mg? Minoriw Cammunifies WeEare Eepar‘i‘men‘h Mammbyq DKS Shaww, {Cg} 2. Raw? Assismn'r Commissioner, Tri§aa¥ & Weh‘ar'e Eeparwraeni‘, Kanker (CG) 3‘ Co§iec+om Diswic? Kunker (CG) 4. 3§oc§< Educn‘rian Officer; Bhampmmp‘pur, Dism‘ic? Knnker (55) 5. Heaé Masfer, ?rimary Schooi Karaiéai, Ehunupmfagpur, Eisfréc‘r Kanker (CG) .\ 'L- validify of fhe order da'red 25.12.2004 (Annexure-P/é) by which a consem was sough'r 'Fr'om Tha pe?i?ionar for recovery of cer‘min amount which was paid 1‘0 him in 3‘ieu of his second f§me-bound promotion. Learned counsei for The pefirioner argues “ma? no wrong paymerzrs were made To rhe pe'i’i‘ricner amf Therefore, recovery canno? bz made en rhe said ccLmi'. Remrn has aiready bean fiied by fi‘ie 5mm. Learned counsei for ‘r‘ne Sim? comericéed ‘rha‘r Tiii Today no recovery order has been issued 1‘0 1'he pe‘ri'rioner and in pursuance of 1’he order do'ied 25.12.2GO4, Stare is no? going To ini‘i'iafe any recovery proceedings. He also confended ‘ihaf as per fhe pleadings of ?he remrn in paragraph 2, ride pe‘rifion is premo‘i‘ure and fhe some is fiied mereiy on apprehensions. tauring fhe course of orgumen‘i's, SmT. Fouzia Mirzo fakes me Through paragraph 4 of fhe refurn in which i1- has heen memionea‘ 'i'hof offer refiremem of fhe pe‘ri‘rioner on 31.01.2006, enTire refiroi dues of ‘Fne pe'i‘i'i'ioner have oireody been paid excep? 10% o’r’ The grorui‘i‘y; The provisionoi pension of The pe?i1’ioner of 90% has aiso been fixed & 10% remaining pension as weii as grafui'ry amounf wiii be paid as and when The maf‘i'er is finaiized by fifie High Gour'r and offer o‘bkxining ins'rrucfions or order from 1'. e Treasury, Accoun'i' & Pension deparfmenf. She fur‘rher submiis “rho? i'his 10% amouni‘ has been wi'rhi'ieid wifh an i i im'emion of recovery §n pursuance of The orcier dm‘ed 25-12—2904 for which The paféfianer §s nm‘ iiabia. Wis argumen‘i' does m? uppacsr m be qgpeamg because it has been menfwnad 'm The reTum fhcd' ‘rha amoun'r has been ‘wifhhew on acccun? of pendancy of fhe yeTi‘rion of fhe pefi‘rioner, f§1erefare, for '5'hé time beEng apprehensioa of ?he pe‘?ifioner appears Ts be baseless. in View of Tha agreed posi‘l'ion W Tim? presemiy no recovery is paMing against The pe'ri‘fioner' for- L~ The fime being, and ?§’3e Govemmgnf is no? going 1'0 make any recovery agains? him, I am no? mdined To perm? fhg prosecufien of i'his pe?ifion anymore and if ":s i'he timg when ?ha proceadings ‘3} a Wshe gae't‘rtioner/shouw be dropped. Accordimgiy, ‘khis pe‘ri‘rion is disposed of in View of The refum fi§ed by fhe Governmen‘r am? a!so on ‘i'he grounci ‘rha’r no recovery is peoding fproposed againsi‘ The paiifioner as on Today. However; 't’ne pe'i'ii'ioner shaii be a‘r iiber'h/ To visit fhis Cour-f again if any recovery iri pursuance 1‘0 oder dais 25322004 is made/proposeé ‘i'o be mania agoinsi' him. 3h The fac‘rs and circumsmrices, pariicuiariy on The basis of fhe pieadings of The government ii“ is ex‘neci‘ed fino'i' ihe order darted 25.i2.2C¥04 shaéi zoo? come in ii'ie way of ihe 5overnmeri? To make f'mcd paymenf to ‘i‘he peti’i‘iooer. ' Sd/- i SUNHJKUMAR SB‘IHA ‘ Judge padma is