IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 315 of 2011 Krishan Lal ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG, Haryana for the State. RANJIT SINGH J. The grievance of the petitioner is that after re-fixing his pay the recovery has been effected. Counsel contends that there was no misrepresentation on the part of the petitioner. Accordingly, counsel for the petitioner relies upon the Full Bench judgment in Budh Ram and others versus State of Haryana and others 2009 (3) SCT 333 to say that recovery in such like cases cannot be directed. Mr. Nehra does not dispute if this part of the prayer is allowed but submits that re-fixation can always be done. Accordingly, recovery which is ordered, is quashed. However, the respondents would be at liberty to re-fix the pay of the petitioner. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of . September 09, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE