IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT ETITION No.2253... 2004 PETITIONER V; ’I I wfgN Hiraman 1al Sahu S/o Shri L.R. Sahu, aged\ about 54 years, Assistant teacher posted at Balak Primary School Karali, (Badi) Block- Magarlod, Tahsil—Kurud, Dist. Dhamatari (C.G.) Resident of Village 85 Post—Kundel, Via—kurud, Tehsil— Kurud 8L Dist. Dhamatari (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh through, Secretary Education Department D.K.s. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) e.‘ Vii} ‘ 6 Q"\e o RESTONDENTS 1. The District Education officer Dhamatari, Dist. Dhamatari (C.G.) The Block Education officer Dhamatari, Dist Dhamatari (CG.) 226 227 ISSUANCE OF WRIT, IN NATURE OF CEERTIORARI MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR OF , IRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERES: D P XLHC-22' W m mw‘gW‘Noyig/émj; WW%§Q§W inmhna@m 26-8-2004 On a mention being made, this case is taken up‘ Petitioner/s by Shri R ‘3‘ paid, Adw wm/ State by Shri V‘V.S, Munhy, Dy: Advocatg‘ General with Shri Satish Gupta, Dy.G.A, and $hri Akhil Agrawal and Shli Sandesp Egubey, Paéel Lawyers. Heard. " ’ The matter relateé to transfer of the petitioner £rom the respective place Counsel for the petitioner/s submltted that the transfer of the petitioner/s has been effected illegauy in contravention of law md policy. State counsel opposed it State counsel submitted that the petitioner/s has straightway filed the petition without serving notice for demancl ofjustilpe and representation. Havmg heard and eonstdered tne nval contentions, Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the opinion of this Court, ends of justice will be served if a direction is given to the petimoneri's t0 make detailed representation raistng hiS/her grievances and grounds before the State Govemment/competent authority of the respondents along with a copy of the peti ion and this order, within lO days, and on such representation being filed, the State Gove mnent/comoetent authority of the respondents, under the law, shall consider and decide he sanie on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible preferably WIU'ii six weeks from the date of receipt/production of the representation. If any contraven ‘on of policy or guidelines is brought to the notice. the same be considered on its own nerits. Counsel for the petitioner/s pra that after the decision of the representation if any grievance of the petitioner/s remain . he/she may be allowed to avail the remedy available under the law. It is open to the p titioner to avail the remedy available under the With the aforesaid observations, t is petition stands disposed of. Consequently M.W.P., ifany, als< stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge /J/ ‘ I l Copy to State counsel for compliaiice. l y