1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CP No.5/2010 in Writ Petition No.2601/2007 Shamrao s/o Motiramji Warkade Vs. Hiralal Balaji Meshram and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. S.V. Bhutada, adv. for the petitioner. Mr. S.P. Palshikar, Adv. for respondents 1 and 2. CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 9th JUNE 2010. 1. Heard counsel for the petitioner and alleged contemnor. The delay in making deposit as the cost for contempt. 2. By an affidavit of Hiralal Balaji Meshram (respondent no.1) it is informed that pursuant to the order dated 19.4.2010 he along with one Mr. Palshikar the son of respondent no.2 had been to the petitioner's home to hand over Demand Draft for Rs. 40,000/- and Rs. 36,505/- as well as Rs. 40,000/- and Rs. 36,185/- towards salary of the petitioner. However, the petitioner did not accept the same and stated that he will accept only on advice of his counsel. There is unconditional apology in the affidavit tendered in the Court. Counsel 2 for the alleged contemnor is equipped with the payments of the amount as indicated above. 3. Needless to add, the alleged contemnor shall in addition to above, shall also pay an amount of Rs. One thousand, which was saddled as costs on 15.10.2008. In addition, there being belated deposit from the respondent, the respondent shall deposit Rs. Five hundred. All such deposits to be made up to 14th June, 2010. With the above observations, contempt petition disposed of. Respondents discharged. (K.U. Chandiwal ) JUDGE Ambulkar.