IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14676 of 2011 1. FIROZ ALAM 2. AJMAT ALI 3. SADAB. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being husband, father-in-law and the brother of the first wife are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 323, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Though, the accusation is of torture and demand of dowry, but it appears from the First Informant Report that the marriage was performed in the year 2010. The informant herself admits the first marriage with the petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that there is absolutely a frivolous claim of the informant as the petitioner no.1 has certain litigation with other doctor for which Complaint Case No. 1485 of 2006 was filed against the said doctor and as a retaliation the said doctor set up this present 2 informant to lodge the present frivolous case. The dispute with regard to the relations between the petitioner no.1 and the informant as husband and wife cannot be decided in the present proceeding. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Bettiah Muffasil P.S. Case No. 44/2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)