1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 3351 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 3351 OF 2011 *** 1. Advocate Mr. Deshmukh makes a statement that order dated 20th October, 2010 is already implemented by petitioner/ plaintiff by adding Respondent No.4 in his plaint. The learned counsel appearing for petitioner states that he has no instructions about these subsequent developments. He wants to argue the matter on merits. 2. Impugned order is dated 20th October, 2010 and writ petition came to be filed before this Court somewhere in January, 2011. The matter was then not circulated. Circulation has been obtained on 28th April, 2011. 3. In view of this position, I am inclined to accept statement of Advocate Mr. Deshmukh. The grievance on merits is, therefore, not looked into. However, petitioner is given 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 3351 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. liberty to challenge the impugned order, after the trial of the suit is over. Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:2/05/2011. ans/3351