IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 5097 of 2000 Between: Smt.Ch.Sumatamma Anganwadi Worker O/o.Project Officer, ICDS Devarakonda Mandal, Kasaram Village, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of A.P., Rep.by its Secretary Women and Child Welfare Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Deputy Director Women and Child Welfare Dept., Vengalraonagar, Near Saradhi Studio Ameerpet, Hyderaabd - 500 044 3 The Asst. Director, Women and Child Welfare ICDS Naglonda, Nalgonda District- 508 001 4 The Project Officer, ICDS Devarakonda, Nalgonda District- 508 001 5 The Commissioner, Women and Child Welfare Hyderabad - 500 022 .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the orders passed by the A.P.A.T. in OA.No.1044/2000 dt.20/03/2000 and also Lr.No.260/E/97, Dt.18/2/2000 fixing 10 years minimum service as on 31/12/1999 as eligibility criteria and also not considering the case of the petitioner for selection process to the post of Supervisor Grade-II as illegal, arbitrary against to the G.O.Ms.No.209, Dt.28/11/1991 and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for selection process to the post of Supervisor Grade-II without insisting for completion of 10 years and pass . Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.POODATTU AMARENDER Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU Writ Petition No.5097 of 2000 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) When the writ petition came up for hearing on 05-8-2008, none appeared for the petitioner and it was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the case is called, none appears for the petitioner nor is there any representation on her behalf. In the circumstances, the conduct of the petitioner indicates that she is not interested to prosecute the matter. The writ petition is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution. ___________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J. ___________________ C.V.RAMULU, J. 06-08-2008 bsc