IN THE HIGH COURTOF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. RSA No.341 of 2010 Date of decision:18.5.2010 Market Committee, Panipat ....Appellant v. United Wool Mills and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG. Present: Mr.Durgesh Aggarwal, Advocate,for the appellant. Rakesh Kumar Garg,J.(Oral) This is defendant's second appeal challenging the judgment and decrees of the Courts below whereby suit of the plaintiff-respondent for permanent injunction restraining the appellant from effecting recovery of a sum of Rs.64019.55 was decreed on the ground that the recovery being sought to be made from the plaintiff-respondent pertained to the period ending 1996 whereas the impugned order declaring the same as land arrears was filed in the year 2001, admittedly after three years. Both the Courts below recorded a concurrent finding that the recovery sought to be made by the appellant was not recoverable being barred by time. On reaching to the aforesaid conclusion the Courts below have relied upon New Delhi Municipal Committee v. Kalu Ram and another, 1976 PLJ 351. Not satisfied with the aforesaid judgment and decrees, the appellant has approached this Court . However, learned counsel for the appellant was unable to point out as to how the recovery sought to be made by them was within limitation. No substantial question of law arises in this appeal which requires interference by this Court while exercising its powers under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure. In the aforesaid view of the matter, I find no merit in this appeal and the same is dismissed. ( Rakesh Kumar Garg) Judge May 18, 2010 rk