IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 88 OF 2008 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 88 OF 2008 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 88 OF 2008 M/s.Ganga Fertilizers P.Ltd. & anr..... Petitioner versus M/s. India Potash Ltd....... Respondent. Mr. H.G. Misar for the petitioner Mr. A.P. Sathe i/b M/s. Pandit & Pandit for Respondent no.1. Mr. J.P.Yagnik APP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 11TH MARCH, 2008 DATED; 11TH MARCH, 2008 DATED; 11TH MARCH, 2008 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The petitioners are original accused in a complaint filed by respondent no.1 under section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act. By this petition, exception is taken to an order dated 6-10-2007 passed by Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 30th Court, Gr. Mumbai which permitted production of a Resolution passed by respondent no.1 company authorising one of its officers to represent the company. The present petitioners objected to the authorisation by contending that the same is not valid. The legality and validity of the authorisation has not been gone into by the trial court while passing the order dated 6-10-2007. The court will pronounce on the validity and legality of the authorisation when it delivers the judgment and for the present only production of two documents, one authorisation and the other articles of Association, has been permitted. It is not in dispute that the trial is at the fag end. One of the prayer made in the present petition is for quashing of the proceedings. At this stage I do not propose to consider any challenge at the behest of the petitioners to the interlocutory order dated 6-10-2007. It shall be open for the petitioners to question the legality and propriety of the order impugned in this petition, in the event the petitioners are required to file an appeal against the judgment delivered by the trial court. Leaving all questions raised in this petition open to be agitated before appropriate forum at appropriate stage, this writ petition is summarily rejected. .....