IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1140 of 2008 BINOD SINGH @ CHHOTKA son of late Narsingh Narayan Singh, resident of vill.-Dehari, P.S.-Bihta, Distt.-Patna ----------------Petitioner. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Ram Kumar Singh, son of late Rangnath Singh, resident of vill.-Dehri, P.S.- Bihta, Distt.-Patna----------------------------------------------------Opp. Parties. -------------- 2. 29.4.2010 Heard. I find no mistake committed by the trial court in allowing prosecution to not produce the witnesses who had gone in the camp of the accused and the learned counsel for the petitioner/accused is justifying/corroborating the observation by persuading to get examined those witnesses in name of coming to the right conclusion which never can be accepted. It is always for the prosecution to select the witnesses who are going on to favour the prosecution case as stated in section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Finding no material this revision petition is dismissed at the stage of admission itself. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J. )