CWP No.3214 of 2010.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.3214 of 2010 Date of Decision: 23.02.2010 **** Charan Singh . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab and others . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. P.P.S. Duggal, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct the respondents No.1 & 2 to register FIR and take appropriate action against respondent No.3. (2). It appears from the averments made in the writ petition that the daughter of the petitioner was married to respondent No.3 and two children were born out of their wedlock. The daughter of the petitioner is said to have died an unnatural death which, according to the petitioner, is homicidal, attributable to respondent No.3. It is on this premise that he wants registration of the FIR under Section 302 IPC against the respondent No.3. CWP No.3214 of 2010.doc - 2 – (3). The petitioner is said to have complained/represented before the respondents including on dated 24.11.2006, but it is alleged that no action has been taken so far as per law. (4). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any views on the allegations levelled by the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take cognizance of the representations/complaints sent by the petitioner and take appropriate action strictly as per law and inform the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (5). Ordered accordingly. (6). Dasti . (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 23.02.2010 vishal shonkar