IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38064 of 2011 1.Sabir Ansari, Son of late Hazi Ishmohammad. 2.Shajahan @ Damkal @ Damkal Ansari, Son of Farook Ansari. 3.Aflab Alam, Son of Manjur Mian. 4.Yunus Mian, Son of late Jalil Mian. 5.Sukhal Yadav, Son of late Kanchan Yadav. 6.Mir Hassan, Son of late Ramnat Ansari. 7.Chota Ansari @ Chhote Ansari, Son of Raifool Azam. 8.Farook Ansari, Son of late Bechu Ansari. 9.Teju Mian, Son of Arjani Mian. 10.Binda Yadav, Son of Kancan Yadav. 11.Baidullah Ansari @ Abdullah @ Pintu, Son of Majid Mian. All are residents of Village Lachhanuta, P.S. Matiyaria, District West Champaran. -------Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party ----------------- 02/- 22/11/2011 Heard Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the eleven petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of Arms Act, are named accused in this case along with another co-accused, namely, Raiful Azam at whose instance Matiyaria P.S. Case No. 20 of 2011 has been instituted against the informant of the present case. Submission is that from earlier case, it is evident that present informant committed some wrong and was taken to task by Raiful Azam, wherein, he sustained some injuries. Further, present petitioners carry general and omnibus allegation and Raiful Azam has also been released on bail after brief detention. Taking into consideration all such aspects of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Matiyaria P.S. Case No. 21 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)