IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.690 of 2009 NANDU MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2/ 19.3.2010 Heard Smt. Anjana Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I find that the order of cognizance dated 18.3.2008 passed by the S.D.J.M., Muzaffarpur West in Paroo P.S. Case no. 10 of 2004 does not require any interference by this court. However, the petitioner may avail of his opportunity of agitating the point of a particular offence or any offence not being made out at the time of hearing under sections 227/228 of Cr.P.C. The petition is dismissed with the above observations. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)