/ 1N THE HlGl-l COURT OF CHHKI‘TISGARH : BILASPUR Wnt Petiiion No. 4233 ot‘2004 Petitioner Kanhaiva Lal Sindhi. S/o Parmanand Simihi, Aged about 30 y'eaxs, R/o Bus Stand Gurm‘, Tahsil Gumr, Dist. Burg (CG) \ i versus C31 (J1 Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Chief Score '~ ’, Vecretan'at, Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Burg, Offlce situated at Durg {C.G.). Sub Divisional Officer, Baiod, Office situated at Balod, Dist. Burg (C.G.). 4. Tahsildar, Gurur, Onice situated at Gurur, Dist. Durg (C.G.) Gopal, S/o Arjun Kanshan', R/o Gurur, Walti No.4, Tahsil Gurur, Dist. Durg (C.G.) WRIT PE’l‘l’I‘ON UNDER ARTICLE 226/ 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB: Hon’bie 8131i Satisn K. Agnihoni J.) Shri Praveen K. Dhurandhar, Advoca e for the petitioner. Shri Shashank ’l‘nakur, Panel Lawyer for the respondents No. 1 to O R D E R (Passed on this 5m Day of November, 2008) 1. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the order dated 8.10.2004, passed by the Sub Divisional Ufticer {RevenueL Balod, District — Durg (Annexure A] 1), whereby the name of the petitioner has been deleted from the voter list of Gurur area, as the petitioner is a voter in Legislative Constituency No. 15, Dhamtan, has prefelred this petitionhseeking a writ in the nature of mandamus] direction to the respondents No. 1 to 4 not to delete the name of the petitioner from the voter list of J / ,/\ \ Gurur area. \ \\ \ 2. Laalned counscl appearing for me petitioner submits that the peu‘tioner is residing in Gurur area of District Durg and as such he wants to be a voter in Gurur area. d The peiitioner made an application for deleting his name from the voter 11st of Dhamtarfl and incorporating his name in the voter list of Gurur. The application was made at the time of preparation of the Voter hst for the election of the Nagar Panchayat, Gunlr in the year 2004. On perusal of the impugned order dated 8. 10.2004 it is tound that the impugned order was passed on the basis of the statement of the petitioner, wherein it was stated that he, his wife and children were residing at Dhamtari and family of his uncle is residing at Gurur. Therefore, it was found that the petitioner was not a resident of Gum. 4. Be that as it may, ii" the petitioner has shifted. his residence to Gurur, he may make an appropriate application for incorporation of his name in the voter list of Gurur and deletion of his name from Dhamtari. 5. In View of the foregoing, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Consequently, M(W)P No. 4600/2004 is also dismissed. ; l Sdl- ‘1 garish K. Agnihotrill ' Judge Thakur