^l BEFORE HOCT'BLB M.P^STATE ap&aNISTBATI-'/E TRIBUHAL ,BENCH,RA^PUR ORZGINAI, APPLICATXON N0. /98. L^pC^^^I0^ Shyam Kumar Patel Soa of Shri BhiKbari Patel Vj.llage soviadour, Post Amaldiha Tahsil Dabhara. District iTanjgeer (M.P.) APPLICAHT VERSCTS 1. Sfcate of M.P. Through Secretary, Scnool Educat-loa Department, Vallabb Btaawaa. Bhopal, M.P. 2. iJolnt D.i.rector, Public Instruetioa Educat.i.on Blvisioa Bilaspj.r, H.P. 3. Depafcy Director, Educati-on Public Zastruction, Educat.i.on Departmeat, Educatj.on District, Janjgeer, i'l.p. . . . NOSI-APPLICANTS ORIGIi'I&.I, A^PLICATION CTHDER SSCTXON 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATI'VE TRXBUNAL ACT 1985. T sn^T^iT h-iM 3n^?i ^HI^) •MIS'fl Tumane -svs •^(FIRT^, wfNms. f»«ii*(3< ^•^i^.2-^?! 'i<^S~ HWWI ShHlch ^^ST' sn^i TCiiw(rf??T - SB: Hon'ble Shri Manlndra Mohan ShHvadain.J 08-OMOW Shri Anupam Dubey, counsel Shri Bhastar Payashi, Panel Wtth the consent of the partiesj Counsel for the petittoner wanlfs llberty to flle fresh representation the circular dated 09-06-2008. He issued for deciding his representation|e State has no objectton. Accordingly, the writ p^jtto(i aforesaid liberty. The represertation of two months from the date of expectedto be decided four months ftom the date ct ts recei'rtt It is made clear that this Courtj the merits oftheoase and the decide the repnesentation strictly in recefpt 'bi'ifd^fl'f "wRif ^^s <r°it<i< i? aiPtfT sn^r ^)r the petttioner. • L^wyer for the State/respondents. the matter is heard finally. to witMraw the present petition with befc|re the State of Chhattisgarti in view of h^wever submits that djrection may be epresentation|expeditJouslyto whteh counsel fbrthe p^itio(i is dtemissed as wtthdravwi with jf filed by the petitraier within a period of copy of this order, the same is by the compe^ent authority within a ftjrther period of has not expressed any ophion upon authotities concemed woukl be at liberty to actcordance with law. Sd/-, • --'-~~ ManindraMoliaGSarivastava Judge .