IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31286 of 2008 ARUN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner Mr. Manoj Kumar For the State : Mr. J.S.P.Singh,A.P.P. 3 14.8.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This is case under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code against unknown persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of a co-accused Munna Yadav. He further submits that petitioner has been examined under section 164 Cr.P.C. and he has stated that Md. Aslam and Lal Bahadur Shashri were the responsible for the occurrence. Further submission of the petitioner is nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he is in custody since 7.12.2005. Learned counsel for the State submits that this is a case under section 392 of the I.P.C. and name of the petitioner has been disclosed by co-accused Munna Yadav. In the facts and circumstances of the case let petitioner Arun Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Bhojpur Ara in connection with Koilwar P.S. case no.113 of 2005 subject to the condition that one of the bailors must be family - 2 - member of the petitioner. Rahman/ (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)