-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.121 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.121 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.121 OF 2008 IN IN IN REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICATION NO.526 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.526 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.526 OF 2007 Yeturi Ramchandra Reddy ...Petitioner vs. Sunshine Sand Suppliers & Anr. ...Respondents WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.122 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.122 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.122 OF 2008 IN IN IN REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICATION NO.527 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.527 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.527 OF 2007 Yeturi Ramchandra Reddy ...Petitioner vs. Jamila Madhukar Bhoir & Anr. ...Respondents WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.123 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.123 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.123 OF 2008 IN IN IN REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICATION NO.528 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.528 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.528 OF 2007 Yeturi Ramchandra Reddy ...Petitioner vs. Kailash Chhatrapati Patil & Anr. ...Respondents WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.124 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.124 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.124 OF 2008 IN IN IN REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICATION NO.529 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.529 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.529 OF 2007 Yeturi Ramchandra Reddy ...Petitioner vs. Manoj Ramakant Patil & Anr. ...Respondents -2- WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.125 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.125 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.125 OF 2008 IN IN IN REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICATION NO.530 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.530 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.530 OF 2007 Yeturi Ramchandra Reddy ...Petitioner vs. Dhananjay Patil And Co. & Anr. ...Respondents WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.126 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.126 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.126 OF 2008 IN IN IN REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICATION NO.531 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.531 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.531 OF 2007 Yeturi Ramchandra Reddy ...Petitioner vs. Chandrakant Govind Bhoir & Anr. ...Respondents WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.127 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.127 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.127 OF 2008 IN IN IN REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICATION NO.532 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.532 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.532 OF 2007 Yeturi Ramchandra Reddy ...Petitioner vs. Lakshman Sukir Patil & Anr. ...Respondents WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.128 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.128 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.128 OF 2008 IN IN IN REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICATION NO.533 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.533 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.533 OF 2007 Yeturi Ramchandra Reddy ...Petitioner vs. Rajesh Madhukar Bhoir & Anr. ...Respondents -3- WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.129 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.129 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.129 OF 2008 IN IN IN REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICATION NO.534 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.534 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.534 OF 2007 Yeturi Ramchandra Reddy ...Petitioner vs. Kailash Sand and Dreadging Co. & Anr. ...Respondents WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.130 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.130 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.130 OF 2008 IN IN IN REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICATION NO.535 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.535 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.535 OF 2007 Mr.Anilkumar Patil for the Petitioner Mr.A.R.Kapadnis h/f Mr.M.S.Mohite for Respondent No.1 Ms M.M.Deshmukh, A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: D.G.KARNIK,J. D.G.KARNIK,J. D.G.KARNIK,J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 11, 2008. : JUNE 11, 2008. : JUNE 11, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. These applications are taken out by the Petitioner for restoration of the Revision Applications which are dismissed for non prosecution. The Respondent No.1 has no objection for restoration of the Revision Applications. In view of the averments made in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Criminal Application, he submitted that the Revision Applications may be allowed subject to costs. As to the quantum of cost the learned counsel submitted that these matters arise out of section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and the total amount of the cheques dishonoured is over Rs.1 crore. Taking -4- into consideration this fact, substantial cost be awarded. 3. Accordingly, I pass the following order : . Applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) of the Applications subject to payment of costs of Rs.2,000/- (two thousand only) in each of the Criminal Application, within one week from today. . Costs shall be paid to the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority or at the option of the Applicant to the Kirtikar Law Library, within the prescribed period failing which all the applications shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. D.G.KARNIK,J. D.G.KARNIK,J. D.G.KARNIK,J.