IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2832 of 2007 RAM GULAM SHARMA, son of Late Newa Lal Sharma, resident of village- Manjhaul, P. O. Manjhaul, Dist- Begusarai, a superannuated Reader From Ram Chalitra Singh College Manjhaul, District- Begusarai. … Petitioner. Versus 1. SRI. ANJANI PRASAD SINGH , Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Human Resources Development, Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. Dr. Mishri Lal Thakur, presently posted as Vice- Chancellor, L. N. Mithila University, Darbhanga. 3. Sri Kumaresh Prasad Singh, presently posted as Registrar, L. N. Mithila University, Darbhanga. 4. Sri Ashok Kumar Karn, Presently posted as, Finance Officer, L. N. Mithila University, Darbhanga. 5. Sri Satya Narayan Sujan, presented posted as Principal R.C.S. College, Manjhaul, Begusarai. 6. The State of Bihar. .. Respondents. ----------- 13. 02.04.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the University. The prayer in this application has been made for initiating the proceeding for contempt against opposite parties for violation of the order of this court dated 24.7.2007. From a perusal of the aforementioned order, it is absolutely clear that no quantification was made as to exact amount rather the direction was in two parts. First part was with regard to payment of amount which the petitioner was entitled under heads (a) to (i). Second part 2 is only with regard to ensuring payment of pension in the revised U.G.C. scale. Today, counsel for the petitioner would submit that the payment of interest on the amount of group insurance has been made only @ 4.5 % and not @ 12.5 per cent. He would also submit that university has not credited the earned leave in correct manner on account of which the petitioner stands looser of the encashment of earned leave of 131 days. Apart from above, the petitioner has also grievance that basic scale has been snatched by a sum of Rs. 2000 per month. The scope of order of this court dated 24.7.2007 as noted above does not quantify any particular amount. The grievance of the petitioner either with regard to interest over the amount of group insurance or earned leave and resultant loss in leave encashment or even the snatching of basic pay scale of Rs. 2000/- cannot be remotely acted as part of specific direction of the order in question. That being so, if the petitioner has any grievance with regard to above or any of them, he may avail the remedy, as available in law but at least the 3 contempt proceeding must be held to be wholly misconceived. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)