5., 'ARH AT BILASPUR’ ‘ WI. NW/Vizaoé PETITIONER : Yuwaj Singh S/o Dr. Chandrahas Smbh Aged absut 46 years Sub-Engmeer Water Resources “w“ D1v1smn Jamglr-Champa, Sub Dmsxon Champa D1stt Janjgjr- Champa (C G) 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA” its: VERSU State ofChhattisgar ’l‘hroughSecretary, Department of Wéiher Resources, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Engineerfin—Chief water Resources RESPONDETS xJ h‘D’COPY am: Department, Bilaspur ‘ (C.G.). : g; 3. The Secretary, Panchayat ‘1 ,z and Gramin Vkas pepartment, D.K.Bhawan,« Raipur (C.G.). .4. Joint secretary Department, i // Panchayat and Gramin " Vikas Department 9 D.K.S.Bhawan, > Raipur (C G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSIIANCE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY PRbHIBITION AN!) ANY OTHER ‘ WRITIORDERIDlRECTlON ON THE SAME NATURE 1N TtlE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE BETAILS OF THE PETiTiGN’ G S XI—HC-78 27 E W , W , W win-mm ..w.‘€.'...3>.a.l.9l@é.; a1 200 mW<W> mam wmm WW§WW mqf%awéru $a§nm 14-7—2006 W.P.Nos.2921/2006, 2877/2006, 2876/2006, 2879/2006, 2880/2006, 2882/2006, 2906/2006, 2933/ , 2938/2006, 2940/2006, 2941/2006, 2942/2006, 2960/2006, 2996/2 6, 2998/2006, 3000/2006, 3044/2006, 3045/2006, 3079/2006, 3081/2 6, 3344/2006, 1563/2006, 3189/2006, 3205/2006, 3222/2 6, 3224/2006, 3225/2006, 3246/2006, 3417/2006, 3418/2006 Pefifioners by Shri Kunak Ti ari 6: P.K.C. Tiwary, 5r. Advocnfes wifh Shri Shashi Bhushan. 5hri Manoj Paranjp , Shri J'H'endr'a Pali, Shri Vinny Pandey, Shri Sunil Ofwani, Shm' Gaufam Khe‘rrapal 5hri AK. Prosad, Shri Maneesh sharma, Shri RS. Shrivas‘mva, 5hri Rakesh Kumur ha. 5+a1'e/respondenfs by 5hri .K. Verma, Addifional Advoca‘l‘e General wifh 5hri V.V.S. Murfhy & 5hri G.K. Beriw I, Depu‘l‘y Advoga‘l'e Generals and Shri Sumesh . Bajqj, Governmenf AdvocaTe for fh’e fai‘e. Shri RP. Mandel, 5ecre1’ary, 3177/2006 , 3240/2006 , Panchuyaf & Rum! Developmenf Deparfmeni': .Shri N.S. Bhadoriya, Engineer—in—Ch ef, Wafer Resources Deparfmen‘r: Shri ML Gupfa, Chief Engineer, Rural Engineering 5er'vice5: 5hri SN. Shrivasfava, Su rim-ending Engineer, PMGSV, Cirde: Raipur 6: Officer-in-Charge, and Shri Subo h Shrivasfnva, Executive Engineer,.Wa+er Resources Deparfmenfs (Si Officer-in Charge are presenf in Court Haldkan, CEO, CGRRDA: Shri 5: Heard. By fhese wrif pefi‘rians, fhe pefi‘i‘ioners, who are Assisfani‘ Engineers in Wdier Resources Deparfmen‘l‘, have hallenged fhe orders dafed 12-6-2006 & 24- 2-2006, whereby fhey have been sen on depufafion 1‘0 various o‘I‘her Depor‘imen‘i‘s. . 2 6 XI-HC-78 . 28 3am,m,%mg{ o‘ooo‘.oo m 200 WW<W> a&$an& $ mmm Ewmna%aa&w WW§WW éawm Af fhe outset 5hri Pramod Var-ma 6x $hri V.V.5. Murfhy mode a sfa‘remenf before fhé CouH‘ fha‘r if fine impugred orders da‘l’ed 12-6-2006 & 24-2—2006 are quashed in respecf of the pefih‘oners who have filed pe+ifions before fhis Court ‘rhey have no objecfion. 5hri Kanak Tiwari, learned Senior Advocafe‘ submm-ed fhaf a copy of fhe Ting dafed 6—7-2006 has been filed, rherefore, There is every apprehension The? 1he respondenfs may pass orders under ‘I'hai‘ scheme in respec‘l‘ of The pefifioners and if wHl affec? The pefH‘ioners‘ inferes‘r. Therefore, he wants to file o countel' affidavit. The prayer of learned Seliiior Advocate Shri Kanak Tiwari cannot be acceded, for fhe reason fhaf in quesfioned The legali‘h/ and corr 24-2-2006 and moreover, fhe so 6-7-2006 are not 1he subjec? marl r in ‘l'hese writ pefitions and fhe respondenfs have no? passed any order under fh so guidelines, so for. As such, fhe prayer made ' by 5hri Kanok Tiwari is rejected. In View of 1he sfniemenf ode oi the Bar by Shri P.K. Vermo’ond Shri V.V.S. Murfhy in presence of fh Officers of The Sim-e, The orders dgfed 12-6-2006 6g 24-2-2006 whereby e pefifioners‘, who ore working in The Wafer Resources Deporfmen‘i as Assision‘l‘ Engineers and have beensenf on depufo‘i‘ion to various o‘iher Deparfmen'is are quas ed and iheir wri‘i‘ pefii‘ions areallowed. rhese wrif pe’rifions, the pefifioners hove cfness of fhe orders dafed 12—6—2006 6t Hed guidelines prepared vide Minufes dafed r 5oma Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge my, ‘Vc ’ affidavit along with Minutes of Mee Parties are entitled for cert fied copy of this order.