IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 23289 of 2010 Date of Decision: 24.12.2010. Naresh Kumar --Petitioner Versus The M.D., H.P.G.C.L., Electricity Bhawan, Sector 6, Panchkula & others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Ravinder Hooda, Advocate for the petitioners. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate present in the Court on behalf of Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. Land of the petitioner's family was acquired for establishment of the Thermal Power Plant at Panipat. The respondents had taken a policy decision dated 6.5.1984 to provide employment to at least one member of the family. The aforesaid policy was followed by another policy dated 7.4.1992. The petitioners claim employment under the aforesaid policy. It seems that the petitioner was even not born at the relevant time, however, it is stated that no other member of the family was given employment. Petitioner has made representation (Annexure P-2) which has not been considered. CWP. No. 23289 of 2010 -2- In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law and the aforesaid policy decision, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the competent authority. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 24.12.2010. lucky