IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1544 of 2007 RAM CHANDRA PRASAD Versus JITAN MAHTO ----------- 6. 24.7.2008 Heard both sides on the petition for restoration of M.A.No. 217 of 1992 along with petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 151 CPC. The miscellaneous appeal in question was dismissed as no body appeared on behalf of the appellant on 1.3.2004. Submission has been advanced that the conducting lawyer for the appellant Mrs. Chandra Kanta Sinha had left practice and even after dismissal of the appeal no communication was made and, as such, this restoration petition has been filed. Learned counsel for the opposite party has opposed the restoration. Having considered entire facts in totality, M.A.No. 217 of 1992 is restored to its original file and number on payment of Rs.2000/- by way of cost to the other side within a period of two weeks with a caution to remain vigilant in future. This petition stands allowed. (Subash Chandra Jha,J.) spal/