IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 52 of 2009 (S/B) Kul Shekhar Nagar ….…… Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ………. Respondents None appears for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Singh Bisht, Standing Counsel for the Central Govt. / respondent No. 1. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel for the State / respondent Nos. 2 and 4. Ms. Bina Pande, Standing Counsel for the U.P. Govt. / respondent Nos. 3 and 5. Mr. Manoj Tiwari, Senior Advocate with Mr. Alok Mehra, Advocate for respondent Nos. 6 and 7. Date of Judgment: 05.05.2011 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. BARIN GHOSH, C.J. (ORAL) On 5th March, 2011, learned counsel for the petitioner informed this Court that the pleadings in the writ petition are complete and, accordingly, we directed the writ petition to be listed in its turn. The said statement was recorded when the interim application and the miscellaneous application were disposed of as not pressed. 2. On its turn, the writ petition was listed before this Court on 26th April, 2011, when the learned counsel for the petitioner requested the matter to be listed in the list for hearing in the week commencing from 2nd May, 2011. Accordingly, we passed such an order. On 3rd May, 2011, the matter was called out for hearing in the first call, when the learned counsel for the petitioner did not appear. We, accordingly, passed over the matter. On 4th May, 2011, again the writ petition appeared and the learned counsel for the petitioner did not appear and, accordingly, we passed over the matter. 3. Even today, no one is appearing on behalf of the petitioner. We, accordingly, dismiss the writ petition for non-prosecution. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 05.05.2011 05.05.2011 Amit