IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5630 of 2009 PAWAN RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Police case under Section 307 and other provisions of the Penal Code. The defence is that he was only the compounder of Dr. Praveen Kumar in front of whose clinic the occurrence took place when the petitioner was also a by stander. Learned counsel for the State points out that anticipatory bail of co-accused Sanjay Verma has been rejected by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 52116 of 2008. In absence of any material on record, in support of the plea that the petitioner was a professional compounder, this Court considers it difficult to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. If the petitioner prefers an application for regular bail and produces materials in support of his claim of being a professional compounder, the application is to be decided on its own merits without being prejudiced by the present order of rejection. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)