IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.20290 OF 2009 DATE OF DECISION: JANUARY 24 ,2011 Sh.Jai Singh and others .....Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Anil Malik, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. S. S. Patter, DAG, Haryana, for the State. Mr. Rajesh Sheoran, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 and 3. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners says that the issue to an extent has been considered and decided by this Court. In this regard, the counsel refers to judgement dated 6.12.2010 passed in Civil Writ Petition No.1122 of 2003 (Raksha Rani Vs. HSAMB and others). As per the reply filed, the petitioners have an alternative efficacious remedy under Section 40(3) of the Punjab Agriculture Produce Markets (Haryana Amendment) Act, 2008. Thus, the CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.20290 OF 2009 :{ 2 }: petitioners may have their alternative remedy of filing an appeal under the above-noted Section, where they would be at liberty to show the view taken by this Court before the Revisional Authority. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. The petitioners are relegated to their remedy of filing an appeal. January 24 ,2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE