IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARN ‘IAKA AT BANGALORE DTED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 1998 BEFORE THE HQN’BLE ,JUSTICE CHANRASHEKARAIAH PETITION NO.1469/1998 BETWEEN: Paneer Selvam s/o Sri .Padrnanabhan, aged about 33 yrs, r/o No, 160, Raghavendra 1 ayout, hicka1 asancira viii age Padmanabha Nagar (Iard No.55) Uttarahalli taluk Bangaioe. . ,petitloner (By M/s C.N.Venugopal & Assts) e 1, The Commissioner, B,C,C, Bangalore, 2, Assistant Executive Engineer, Padmanabhanagar (Range) Bangaio e Mahanagar palike, Bancaiore, ..Resps /2/ (By Sri K,N.Puttegowda for Resps) i.P filed u/a 226 & 227 of the constitjtion of India with an affidvit praying to: Direct to stay the proceeding initiated by the respondents in respect of the shedule property and to permit the petitioner to resume the construction work without any interuption pending d 4 sposal of the dispute on the alleged deviations as oer the provisional order dated 30,4,98 issued under section 321(1) of th’ arnataka Muncipality Act vde Ann,P and etc,, i coming on for Prly,hg this day, the court made the following: ORDER Tne petitioner in this petition has challenged the provisional order passed under Sec,321(1) of the KMC Act (AnnexureF) aoprehendin tlvt the Corporation is t kind steps to demolish the bui’ding put up by the oetitioner, The Corporation without passing a final order under Sec,321(3) of the Act, has no power to demolish the bui1ding Threfore, there is no reason for the petitioner to anorehend any such e .3 4 /3/ such demolition by the Corportion, In the said view of the matter, this Detition is rejected. The Petitioner is restrained rm putting up any construction contrary to the anofoved plan till final order is passed under Sec,321(3) of the Act, Sd/-Judge. Cu r.by;S b \‘$k cc!,p7 C • yt tflt igL tt o -