IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 6 OF 2005 MRS. MARIA ZELIA FILOMENA ....Appellant M.MASCARENHAS PORTUGAL Versus MR.THOMAS A.PIRES AND 10 ORS., ....Respondents Shri F. M. Reis, Advocate for the appellant Coram:- R. M. LODHA, J. Date:- 21st September, 2005 P.C. Heard Mr. F.M. Reis, the learned Counsel for the appellant. I perused the Order dated 16.09.2004 passed by the trial Court dismissing the appellant's (the plaintiff's) application for grant of temporary injunction. The learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the grievance in the present appeal is only confined to the property that was purchased by the respondent No.10 (the defendant No.10). At this stage, it cannot be said that the defendant No.10 is not a bonafide purchaser of the subject-property for a valuable consideration. From the available material, it appears that the defendant No.10 had paid a consideration of Rs.10,00,000/- and the sale deed has been registered in his favour. I am, thus, satisfied that no case for interference in the impunged order is made out. The appeal from order is dimissed in limine. R. M. LODHA, J. ssm.