IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 17TH MAY 2011 / 27TH VAISAKHA 1933 WP(C).No. 13564 of 2011(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- AHAMED SEYD P.T., HEAD OF SECTION IN ELECTRONICS & INSTRUMENTATION, WOMEN'S POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE-KOTTAKKAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA-676 501. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, PADMAVILASAM ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695023. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SUDHA DEVI N. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO.13564 OF 2011 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT This Writ Petition has been filed to redress the grievance against Ext.P5 order of transfer. According to the petitioner, transfer is effected as per Ext.P5 in total disregard to the norms under Ext.P2 G.O. Raising such contentions, the petitioner has already filed Ext.P6 representation before the first respondent. The petitioner apprehends that pending disposal of Ext.P6, the order of transfer would be implemented. It is in the said circumstances that this Writ Petition has been filed. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader. Admittedly, against Ext.P5 order of transfer, the petitioner has moved the first respondent through Ext.P6. Ext.P6 is still pending. In the said circumstances, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions raised in this Writ Petition and also in Ext.P6, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this W.P.(C) NO.13564/2011 2 judgment. In case no substitute has been posted against the post which the petitioner is holding, the petitioner shall be permitted to continue in the said post till the disposal of Ext.P6. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc //true copy// P.A. to Judge W.P.(C) NO.13564/2011 3 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. JUDGMENT September, 2010