1 spb/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 676 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant. Versus Harishchandra Jakha Mhatre & Ors. .. Respondents. --- Mrs. R.V.Newton, APP for the Applicant. Mr. S.V.Gavand for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. --- CORAM : B. R. GAVAI, J. DATED : 25th FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C. : 1. The applicant-State challenges the concurrent findings of facts recorded by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, vide order dated 9th of August, 2007, thereby acquitting the accused nos. 1 to 4 for the offence punishable under sections 324, 323, 504 and 506 read with section 34 of the IPC vide section 248 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Raigad-Alibag dated 13th October,2008 thereby dismissing the Appeal of the State. Both the courts below have accordingly held that the prosecution has failed to prove the case beyond reasonable 2 doubt by leading cogent evidence. No perversity could be noticed in the order passed by the learned Trial as well as Appellate Court. 2. Revision is rejected. (B.R.GAVAI, J.) .....