IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22767 of 2010 BALIRAM SINGH S/O LATE RAMDEO SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.22920 of 2010 1. ISLAMM KHAN S/O LATE HANIP 2. SHEIKHMOHAMMAD S/O JAHIR ALAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 07.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 3 R.P. (U.P.) Act. Considering that the petitioners are in custody since 24.5.2010 and undertake not to indulge in similar activity after their release from jail custody and the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Dehri- on-Sone R.P.F. Case No. 11/2010, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit - 2 - giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and the other bailor shall be the mother/brother of the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuses, (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled . Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )