C.O.C.P. No. 1712 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- C.O.C.P. No. 1712 of 2008 Date of Decision 9.7.2009 Rajiv Garg .... Petitioner Versus Sheenu Garg .... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG. Present:- Mr. O.P.S.Tanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. M.K.Singla, Advocate, for the respondent. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (oral) As per the averments made, the respondent had undertaken in the Court of Kishore Kumar, Additional District Judge (A), FTC Sangrur in HM Act Case No. 55 dated 8.12.2006 decided on 19.12.2007 that the petitioner shall be entitled to meet the minor son in school or outside the house and no hindrance will be put in this regard before the petitioner. It is alleged by the petitioner that the respondent has breached the aforesaid undertaking. According to the petitioner when he went to the school and house to meet the child, he was not allowed to meet him. In response to the show cause notice, respondent has appeared in the Court along with minor child Arman Garg who is of twelve years of age and is studying in Class VIIth. C.O.C.P. No. 1712 of 2008 2 This Court inter-acted with the child in the presence of the parties in the open Court. When specifically asked, the child admitted that the petitioner had come to meet him but he refused to meet the petitioner. He further stated he does not wish to meet him. In this view of the fact alone, this Court was not inclined to proceed further in this petition. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to seek any other appropriate remedy in accordance with law. With the aforesaid liberty, this petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn. Rule discharged. At this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent has stated before this Court that in pursuance of the orders passed by this Court on May 27th, 2009, the respondent had furnished a cash security of Rs.20,000/- in the form of receipt challan in the State Bank of Patiala, Branch Sangrur, which may be allowed to be withdrawn by her. The prayer of the respondent is accepted. The respondent is entitled to withdraw the aforesaid amount as deposited by her as cash security in form of receipt challan of State Bank of Patiala, Branch Sangrur vide No. 610791. July 9, 2009 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) tripti Judge