SAS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.712 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.712 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.712 OF 2006 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.32 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.32 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.32 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. The Sakura Bank Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.A.S. Rao for appellant. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- The respondents have been served. None present. There is a delay of 274 days in filing the appeal. There is affidavit in support of motion. It appears that the delay between 21/12/2004 to 9/11/2005 was occasioned in the Law Ministry. Thereafter, the department took time to get the necessary Court fees stamp and that took some time. Considering the above, in our opinion, the cause shown would amount to sufficient cause. Delay is condoned. Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the appeal. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.)