Ea'HEiION'gI^HieHiC^^I^^^^^^ BHiASPUR First AiwealNo^ t^ ^^ 7At.& y!8ton:8®Rffli APPELLANT Applicant RESPONDENT Non-applicant Ganga Bai w/o Qhittar Singh, aged about 47 years, caste- Satnami, R/o village Nardha, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS Chitta»Singh S/o Genda Singh, aged about 49 years, caste- Safnami, R/o village Nardha, Tahsil- Dhamdha, Distriet Durg (C.G.) At place of work -Chittar Singh s/o Udu, aged about 49, personal No. 143342, Post - Senior Technician, Department - MRD Bhilai, Steel Plant Bhilai, Tahsil 85 District Durg (C.G.) APPEAL UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THEFAMILY COURT'S ACT KteissHS»~ee!^!Sawa [!!te<HB(RSMBSE5g®^^S ^•fysss»3l.. /^-sS1'- ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH: HON'BLE MR. I.M.QUDDUSI & HQN'BLE MR. G. MINHAJUDDIN. JJ Appellant Applicant Respondent Non-applicant First Appeal (M) No. 78 of 2011 Ganga Bai Vs Chittar Singh • Present: None for the appellant. None for the respondent, though served. ORDER (Oral) (9th December, 2011) Per I.M. Quddusi, J; List is being revised. The case was called out twice. However, no one is present on behalf of either of the parties. In view of above, we have no other option but to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. However, liberty is reserved to the appellant to file a restoration application, if so advised. ^ss Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- G. Minhajuddin Judge ^