CWP no. 6554 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP no. 6554 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on : 16-11-2011 Mohan Singh ....Petitioner VERSUS Financial Commissioner, Punjab Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr. Sameul Gill, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. R.P.S.Sidhu, AAG, Punjab Mr. G.S.Virk, Advocate for Mr. G.S.Nagra, Advocate for respondent no.5 MAHESH GROVER, J Misc. application no.15318 of 2011 has been filed for disposing of the writ petition in view of the compromise. The proceedings arise out of partition proceedings. Following are the terms of compromise:- “In the map of the partition prepared by the Revenue staff in this case the petitioner Mohan is given 20 karams front on Batala Fatehgarh Churrian Road on western side whereas the respondent Kulwinder Singh is given 5 karams on front on the said Road on Easter side. On the backside of the filed (South), the petitioner is given 14 karams on Western side, whereas the respondent Kulwinder Singh is given 4 karams on Eastern side. Whereas now the parties have agreed and compromised as under:- CWP no. 6554 of 2011 (O&M) 2 Petitioner Mohan Singh : 20 karams front on Batala Fatehgarh Churrian Road on western side. Respondent Kulwinder Singh : 5 karams front on Batala Fatehgarh Churrian Road on Eastern side. Petitioner Mohan Singh : 14 ½ karams on backside of the filed (south) towards western side. Respondent Kulwinder Singh: 3 ½ karams on backside of the filed (south) towards Eastern side. Rest of the terms of partition may remain the same and the revenue officers may partition the land accordingly. The petitioner Mohan Singh and respondent Kulwinder Singh have no objection if the above said writ petition is disposed of in above said terms of compromise.” Both the petitioner and respondent no.5 are present in Court and they have also got their statements recorded separately to the effect that they stand by the compromise. In view of the aforesaid, CM no.15318 of 2011 is allowed and the instant writ petition is disposed of in terms of the compromise to which the parties shall be bound. The necessary follow up action shall be taken up by the Revenue Authorities in view of the aforesaid compromise. November 16, 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge