IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Contempt Petition No. 61 of 2007 in Writ Petition No.1200 of 2006 1. Moolchand Gangaram Kumbhar and others ..Petitioners vs. 1. Additional Collector, Mumbai Suburban District and others ..Respondents Mr.Santosh B.Narwade i/b M/s V.P.Vashi and Associates for petitioners. Mr.Milind More, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 to.3. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. J. J. 4th August, 2007 4th August, 2007 4th August, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This petition alleges violation of order passed by this Court on 8th June, 2006 in Writ Petition No.1200 of 2006. That order directs the respondents before me to consider the petitioners’ application for eligibility for permanent alternative accommodation in the light of demolition of their premises. 2. The order directs that if the application is filed within four weeks from the date of the order, the Competent Authority to decide the same and pass appropriate orders not later than 12 weeks from the date of its receipt. 3. Shri More appearing for the respondents has pointed out that the original file discloses that the representation/application of the petitioners was received within time stipulated by this Court in its order and disposed of also within the said period. The order has been duly communicated to the petitioners’ Advocate and copy of communication is also shown to me. 4. In the light of the aforesaid, there is no merit in the contempt petition. The order has been complied with. If the petitioners are aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order their remedy is to take out substantive proceedings for challenging the same. Reserving that remedy and all contentions therein the present contempt petition is dismissed. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)