c^ ^jliCjl Qk IN THE HONi'BLE HIGH COURT OF PBTITIONERS ^si:^ ^•'•^•^ys .•-•'yy" ^•"^" ..'"' CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. W.P. (S) No.....<?T&?.c{.......2011 ^ (1) Abhishek Ghatge s/o Shri Raghunath Gathge Aged about 23 years^Ayodhya Nagar Mahasamund District Mahasamund (C.G.) ^' (2) Mukesh Kumar Chandrakar S/o Shri Khorbahra ram, Shankar Nagar Ward no 1 Mahasamund District Mahasarnund (C.G.) ^- RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1.^ State of Chhattisgarh Through - the Secretary Tribal and welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. y Assistant Commissioner Tribal and welfare Department Mahasamund Distt. Mahasamund (C.G) WmT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE U/A-226 OF THE ^ CONSTITUTION OF mDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR MANDAMUS/DIRBCTIOH OF OTHER APPROPRJATE WRIT. -HC-22 377^ ^T ^ich ^Tg^i ^RN5"^rftc[ :Y^-> -g-ccf r^t|^M<4, ^Ttl^^Ko, fa<rtwli< ^.:e:^1...2^ /<2-&^ ^^^ - ^'—'-^^200 ^IN^tl ^W^ ^f^f' ^n^i ^n^R ^Tftc? (SS: Hon'bie Mr. Nanindrs IVIohan 18.5.2011 Mr.Somkant Verma, Advocatej Mr. Arun Sao, Go'v't.Advocst^ and 2 on advance copy. Hoard. The petitioners have thh are wards of Asslstant Teachers moved an appijcation for compassl^ given appolntment on the post petltioners submitted that thoy a( Asslstant Tcacher accordlng to the Lcarned State counsei petitloners rnay be given an oj| representation before the' competert bo considorod on its ov^ m-erits, In ^c Having considored ^and v^ith^i merjts of tho case, in'the oplnion ol son/od, If a dlrectlon Is given to t| representatlon raising their grl^ authority along vvith a wlthin six from today, and the competent fQspondent authorit^ merfts in accordance wlth iaw as e^j v^th^ut ci?hl<n<flrt 'Wl^if ~? (^^ <fa<^i< ^7 3?Tp<T'qf 3Tr^T Ihrlvastav.a, J») TOf the petftioners. for the Stato/rospondents-No.1 potition on the ground that they _ (^ho died whlie in servlce. They mate appolntment and thoy havo .ShlRsha Karmi Grade 1.11.. The t-e entltlod to be appolntod as rfolicy, sub^nttted that for the present, the )portunity of flilng the detaljed respondent aythcrity, whlch may (ocordance with law. expresslng any opinion on the thls Court, ends of justlco wiii be ie petltiooers to- a detalSed vsnees before the competent c{opy of the potltion and this order, rs such rspresentatlon belng filed, shall declde the. sams on ISs own ^riy as possible preferabiy withln a H^ •^T, XI-HC-22 STr^T^T f<rlJ<=h 'STT^T 9n^i<=h <if^a '^''. w T ^ST ^l<41d<ll, ^nl^^Ko, facrti^y 31T^T ~^e. c'^'2^1^^U •^/ 200 ^l[HCTT ^HI^ 'I^^T' 'sn^r'^TTW^f^T -^- period of four months from the dat^ any griovancs stili remalns, ths avallabte under the iaw. Wlth ths aforesaid obsen/atl^ Other applications, if any, st^ Certified copy, as per rules. ^ of rece'.pt of the rspresentetson. If petitioners may avali the remsdy |n, thss petltlon star.ds dispossd of. |nd dlsposed of. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge cbl^(dxii1y1 'HW^ff ^ fiT^ iPsl^K ^T3^TT3Tr^T [^ ^