1 upa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.1891 OF 2004 SUMMARY SUIT NO.1891 OF 2004 SUMMARY SUIT NO.1891 OF 2004 Lalit Sanghavi ).. Plaintiff Versus M/s.Ravi Frozen Foods Ltd. ).. Defendants Mr.Tushar Goradia with Ms.Sheetal Shah i/b.Mehta & Ghirdharlal for the Plaintiff. None present for the Defendants. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 13TH MARCH 2006 DATED : 13TH MARCH 2006 DATED : 13TH MARCH 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . By an order dated 5th October 2005, this Court had directed the Defendants that an amount of Rs.30 lakhs be deposited in this Court within four weeks from that date failing which the Plaintiff was entitled to a decree. It appears that the Defendants instead of depositing the amount, have challenged the order in the Supreme Court being S.L.P No.24798 of 2005. The Supreme Court on 12th December 2005 directed the Defendants to deposit the amount in accordance with the order of this Court after extending the time by a further period of eight weeks. Yet, this amount has not been deposited by the Defendants. Non-deposit certificate from the office is on record. 2 2. In view of the order passed on 5th October 2005, Suit decreed as prayed for. 3. Refund as per the Rules. 4. Certified copy expedited.