-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 640 OF 2007 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 640 OF 2007 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 640 OF 2007 WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 907 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 907 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 907 OF 2007 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.640 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2655 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2655 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2655 OF 2007 IN L.C.SUIT NO. 2598 /2007 Prabhavati Shetty .. Appellant. V/s. 1. Slum Rehabilitation Authority and others. .. Respondents. --- Mr. S.P.Kanuga i/by Mrs. Sapna Nath with Mr.J.S. Chandnani Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. J.G.Reddy for the Respondent No.1. Mr.Warerkar for the Respondent No.3. --- CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2007. DATED : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2007. DATED : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2007. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. :- . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. There is no dispute that the appellant has made a complaint before the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (hereinafter referred to as ‘SRA’, for short) in pursuance of the order passed by the division bench of this court dated 22.06.2006 in writ petition No. -: 2 :- 1034/2006. According to the appellant, her complaint has not been considered and decided by SRA. 2. Learned counsel appearing for SRA makes a statement that the complaint made by the appellant dated 21.07.2006, which is annexed to the petition at Exh.‘E’, will be considered and decided within a period of six weeks from today. His statement is accepted. He undertakes to communicate this order to the concerned authority within one week from today. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for SRA, Mr. Kanuga, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal. 3. Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. 4. In view of this order, nothing survives in Civil Application No.907/2007 and it is disposed of as such. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) .....