i5S^I3: ^ f^^- lli® ^ ^' ^ HICai COVRT < CHHA'mSOAmi AT BIUU <?R SB : HON»BLB8HRI JUSTICB PRITI21KBRDIWAKBR W.P. (2271 N0. 204a/20<» PETITIOIIBR KaQfeer Roadw^Sy ThroMgh tiie Maiiagmg Partaer, Preetaxa Siagh Garcha, S/o, Late Jogendar Siag, aged about 59 years, R/o. Civil Liaes, Raipur (CG) (Applicantbefore the R.T.A.) RB8PONDENTS Versus 1. Regional Transport Aufhoiily, G.E, Road, Opposite Lal Gaiiga Shoppmg MaU, Raipur (CG) 2, Mathan Lal, S/o. Magan Lal, aged about 35 years, C/o. Maliendra Travels, Raipur, Distt. Raipiir (CG) (Applicant before tfae R.T.A.) WRIT PIESnnOIl TOIDBRAKnCLE 22T OF TH& coNSTmmoN <»*INDIA Aooearaace: Shri S.K.Bajpai, coxuisel for the petitk>iier, Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for fhe State/respondent No. 1. ORALORDBR (24.04.2009) At the outeet, Shri Anm Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State/resp. No< 1 submits fhat fhere is aa altemative reniedy available to the petitioner for approachiag the State Traasport AppeUate Tribunal. Counsel for the petitk>ner submits that at prcseiit, post of Presidua® officer in State Transport AppeUate Tribunal is Iving vacant. Shri Sao hias produced a copy of the order dated 17.4,2009 passed by the State Goveniment re^ndiiig appoiatmexit of Shri Ashok Kumar NixEioiiJbBr as the Presidiiig OlGBcer ofthe State Traiisport Appellate Tribimal. In view of this fact, couiisel for tlie petitioner wante to withdraw fhe present writ petitton with Mberty to approacli fhe State Traasport AppeUate Tribuxial by filiag rcvision. Accoidingly, fhe petition is disxnissed oa withdxawii with Uberty as aforcsaid, However^ it is dirccted that if the petitioner files fhe rcvision before the State Transport Appellate Tribuxial the same shaU be decided expeditiously. Registry is directed to retum fhe certi&ed copy of fhe order dated 28.01.2009 passed by fhe Regional Traasport Authority provided fhat dxily attested Xeiox copy of fhe saiae is furaishedby the couD^el jfor the petitioner^ ^ ,...^^e< P^^ge