IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 274 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 73 OF 2009 SHRI. SURESH VINAYAK RAIKAR AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus SHRI. JANARDAN PANDU MADKAIKAR AND 106 ORS., ... Respondents Ms. Astrid Pereira, Advocate for the appellants. Coram:- U. D. SALVI, J. Date:- 9th June, 2010 P.C. Heard. Perused. 2. Respondent nos.104, 105, 106, 107(a) to (g) being legal heirs of deceased respondent no. 107 were arrayed as appellants before the First Appellate Court. They were shown as respondents as they could not provide vakalatnama for the purpose of institution of present appeal on account of they staying at Bombay. Respondent nos. 92 to 102 also belong to the same family as the appellants and have not contested the proceedings earlier as their interest is represented by the appellants. Respondent nos. 101 and 103 have expired. Permission is therefore granted to transpose respondent nos. 104, 105, 106 and 107(a) to (g) as well as respondent nos. 92 to 97, 98(i) to 98(n) and 100 and 102 as appellants. Necessary amendment be carried out to the appeal memo. 3. MCA no. 274/2010 stands disposed off accordingly. U. D. SALVI, J. vn