1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.466 of 2007 Kashinath Baburao Kulthe & another ...Appellants V/s. Dashrath Nana Dhongade ...Respondent M.S.Karnik for the appellant Mr.Girish Agrawal for respondent no.1 CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED :16th June, 2008 P.C. . Both the Courts having considering the material on record dismissed the appellants claim,therefore, present appeal. 2. There is a clear finding given by the Courts below that there is no fraud in the matter as plaintiff failed to prove the same. In the result, the sale deed dated 2-2-1984 and all transactions arising out of the same remained intact. The plaintiff further failed to prove that the entire amount of Rs. 30,000/- was paid to the plaintiffs. 3. This facet, therefore, endorse that the sale deed in question is valid and binding between the parties. Having once comes to this conclusion and concurrently 2 accepted by the Courts below, it is difficult to accept the case of appellant to interfere with the findings so arrived at on the foundation of alleged unconscious or one sided sale transaction. 3. The facet and allegations of fraud once not proved and remained intact, this submission is, therefore, unacceptable. 4. There is no perversity in the order. The views so taken by the Courts below need no interference. Second Appeal is dismissed. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.]