1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.04.2011 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.(MD).No.4166 of 2011 S.Gopal : Petitioner -Vs- 1. The Superintendent of Police Theni District, Theni 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Andipatty Taluk, Andipatty 3. The Inspector of Police Kadamalaikundu Police Station Kadamalaikundu, Theni District : Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second and third respondents to give permission and protection for cultural programme to be held on 15.04.2011 and 16.04.2011 in connection with the Kaliamman Koil situated at Solaithevanpatty, Andipatty Taluk, Theni District. For Petitioner : Mr.Veera Kathiravan For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramanian, Additional Government Pleader O R D E R Mr.K.Balasubramanian, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. By mutual consent of both sides, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second and third respondents to give permission and protection for cultural programme to be held on 15.04.2011 and 16.04.2011 in connection with the Kaliamman Koil situated at Solaithevanpatty, Andipatty Taluk, Theni District. 3. Though the petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking the above said larger relief, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is given to the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 28.03.2011. 4. The learned Additional Government Pleader would submit that a direction may be issued to the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 28.03.2011 and pass orders within two days, in the light of the order, dated 24.09.2009 in W.P.(MD).No. 9559 of 2009. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. Heard Mr.K.Balasubramanian, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. Though the petitioner has come forward with a larger prayer, considering the limited prayer made by the petitioner before this Court today as per the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the representation, is constrained to direct the third respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner, dated 28.03.2011 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within two days from today in the light of the order dated 24.09.2009 in W.P.(MD).No. 9559 of 2009. The petitioner shall also produce the order copy of this Court along with fresh copy of the representation, dated 28.03.2011 to the third respondent. 7. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. SD ASST REGISTRAR ( CO ) /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST REGISTRAR vsg TO: 1. The Superintendent of Police Theni District Theni 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Andipatty Taluk Andipatty 3. The Inspector of Police Kadamalaikundu Police Station Kadamalaikundu, Theni District 1CC TO MR. VEERA. KATHIRAVAN, ADVOCATE,SR: 13632: 1CC TO THE SPL. GOVT PLEADER SR: 13729: DM:2011::APRIL:12::: W.P.(MD).No.4166 of 2011 12.04.2011 2P:6C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/