.-€' 'r IN TH.E HIGH COURT OF BHHATTTSGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No.713 /05 PETITIONER Paraeshwar Yadav, Son ofShri H.R.Yadav, Age 40 years, Principal, Jagriti Higher Secoadary School Rengale, P.0« Rengale. Tehsil Bageecha, Dist. Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, Versus RESPOKDErn'S ^^r^ ^w^^7 (1) State of Chbattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Edacation Departmeat, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipjr, Chhattisgarh, (2) Qsllector, Qistrict Jashpur (Chhattisgarb) ^fs) District Education Officer, District Jashpur (Cbhattisgarb). ^i(4) sadeep Mukherjee, Ad^ocate, Jashp-ir, District Jashpur (Chha'ttisgarh)» PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITOTION ^•.o-' ^ &E .,=€£.I /^My ••^y 1 ^ &'. S s^ .. •.. <». t.^ 'l' m m y°-^ _y;»viJ R<2-srt..5 ViS^. -ti.-t^-'' o^) ^......;^'" OF I "y^ w ^l^' -^ Fj Af^ '-• ^ 'N"''''"' - --cSioi :,.-„. C^E : r-1 "^: w- o!:"''p^ -••'!ii'il ^ontd..•2 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K.AGNIHffTRLJ, Petitioner Respondents WR1T PETITtON iSlO.713 OF 200S Parmeshwar Yadav versys State of Chhattisgarh and others ,.:^. Present : Mr.RajeevShrivastava.counselforthepetitioner. Mr. Satish Gupta, Deputy Government Advocate for the State/respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Pankaj Agrawai, counsel for respondent No.5. Noneappears for respondent No.4, • ORDER (Passedon 27"'Day (rf February,2007) Learned coynsel appearing for the peftioner submits that on the basis of a ietter dated nit (R-1) wrltten by one Advocate te the Collector, Jashpur, the school of the petitioner, namely, Jagriti Higher Secondary Schoo! Rengale, Post Office Rengale, Tahsil Bageecha, District Jashpur has not been permitted to hold ,10 and 12t Classes' Board Examinations. Learned counset further submte that without verification of the ground reality, the schoot has not been pennltted to have a centre for Board Examinations. The school of the pettioner has bssn CQfrtJnuing !n the past as centre tor Board Examinations of 10 and 12t Classes. Learned counsel ftirther submte that there are several other places where the examinatton centre has been permitted i 1 •IIli lii F^^ !i.a despite having the similar ground reaiities and cireum^ances, as have been found naxalite affected areas vide ietter dated 29-1-2007 (P-8). 2. Leamed counsel appearing for respondent No.5 - Board submits that it is not possible to open the examination centre within a short period of Uiree days as the examinatfons are to commence from 1st March;2007. 3. Be that as it may, the respondente are directed to consider representation of the petitioner keeping in view the aforesteted submisa'ons made by tfie petitioner.for futore. ?w 4. costs. Thus, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge —•a^'SS-as -'?