CI APPLICANT VERSUS ) \9 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPUR ; WRIT ?E'1‘ITXON (C) No. 3320 0f2009 PETITEONER Shabbir Ali S/o Shri Saiyad Ahamed Ali Aged about 35 years, R/0 C-18, Sector A 5, Devendra Nagar Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS : 1. State 0f Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretaxy Tfausport Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 2. Regional Tran'siport Authority, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya? Raipur, District Raipur (CG) ‘WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA £3; Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J_. A asen‘u Shri Ajay Shrivastav¢ Advocate for the petitioner. Shn‘ Arum Sac, Government Advocate for thc State/rccpondents. .. .. .. ORDER ORAL) day of Juiy, 2G09) (Passed on 13 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 1. Learned counsei appearing for ihe petitioner? on insiructions, submits that the peti‘iioner does no: want to contest this petition on merits at this stage. However, the responoent-authorities may be directed to consider and decitie his pending application dated 24.4.2009 (Annexure P/i) in accordance with iaw, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible. 2. Shri Sac. learned Government Advocate appearing for the State/respondents submits that there is no reason aeto why the representation of the petitioner, as stated above should not be considered expeditiousiy. Shri Sao submits that the above-stated representation shall be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of four week horn the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. 3. In view ofthe clear statement made by learned counsel appearing for the respondents, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing remains to be adjudicated. .Accordinglx the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. i i ' Sd/- . Satish K. Agnihotri p Judge