IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22513 of 2011 Babita Devi, daughter of Daroga Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 05.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Informant and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner is a young girl and there is no specific overt act against her, let the petitioner in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Bairiya P.S. Case No. 46 of 2011, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C., and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given 2 dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)