IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8260 of 2008 JAGESHWAR KEWAT & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.5.2008 Heard. This is a case under sections 304B, 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner no.1 is the uncle-in-law of the deceased and petitioners no. 2 and 3 are her mother- in-law and father-in-law. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that four co-accused of this case have been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court and the case of the petitioners stands on similar footing. The husband of the deceased is in custody. They are living separate from his son and daughter- in-law. The petitioners come from a poor family. Hence, there is no question of demand of dowry money. Considering the fact that a bride of the family died unnatural death within seven years of her marriage and considering relationship of petitioners no. 2 and 3 with the deceased, who are elderly member of the family and are supposed to manage the affairs of the family, I do not feel inclined to release them ( petitioners no. 2 and 3) on bail. Their prayer for bail, therefore, is rejected. So far petitioner no.1 is concerned, since he is uncle-in-law and not directly related to the deceased, he ( Jageshwar Kewat) is directed to be 2 Surendra/ released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Barh, Patna in Pandarak P.S.Case No. 127/2006. ( Rekha Kumari,J.)