IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1600 of 2009 1) Ram Rajya Prasad Sharma, son of Jai Gobind Prasad Sharma, village Barbatta in front of Block 124 and 126, East Police Station Sonepur, Dist. Saran. 2) Harshbardhan Singh, son of Shri Rajiv Nayan Singh, village Barbatta in the Back of Block 124 and 126, PS Sonepur, Dist. Saran – Petitioner. Vs. 1) Divisional Railway Manager, E.C. Railway, Sonepur, Saran. 2) Senior Divisional Engineer (Coordination), E.C. Railway, Sonepur, Saran. 3) Assistant Engineer Construction, E.C. Railway, Sonepur, Saran. 4) Inspector of Works (I.O. Lal) E.C. Railway, Sonepur, Saran – Respondents. 6 25.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this writ petition the petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that the railway authorities are constructing boundary wall to protect the railway colony which is on the side of the railway line. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there was a passage of 10’ between the colony and the land of the petitioners which statement has been made in the rejoinder to the counter affidavit. On the basis of the aforesaid fact the petitioners allege that the railway authorities by constructing the boundary are encroaching upon the lands which belong to the petitioners. In my opinion the railway authorities are justified in constructing / raising the boundary on the land which belongs to them to protect the railway property. If the petitioners have any grievance, they can move before the appropriate authority for measurement of their lands, if so advised. This writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J .)