1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.804 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1000 OF 2010 Chhagan B. Dedhia ..Appellant V/s. Municipal Corporation of ..Respondent Greater Mumbai WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO.18219 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO.18221 OF 2010 K.R.Jayaprakash ..Appellant V/s. Municipal Corporation of ..Respondent Greater Mumbai Mr.M.V.Holamagi, Advocate, for the Appellants Smt.K.K.Soraan, Advocate, for the Respondent - MCGM CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 22ND JULY, 2010 P.C. . Not on board. 2. Mentioned. 2 3. Taken on board. 4. These Appeals are directed against the Order passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court, Mumbai dated 17 th July, 2010, which reads as under :- Earlier order stands vacated. Adjourned to 12 th August, 2010. 5. The Order does not disclose any reason as to why earlier Order has to be vacated. Issue notice to the Municipal Corporation. Smt.K.K.Soraan, Advocate waives service on behalf of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. 6. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellants. 7. Since the Order does not disclose any reason, Appeals from Order are allowed. The impugned Order is quashed and set aside. The learned Judge to re-hear the parties on the 3 question whether the vacation of earlier Order, which he had vacated, was warranted. Till the learned Judge decides this question, parties shall maintain status-quo. The learned Judge may decide the question on the date fixed i.e. 12 th August, 2010. 8. In view of disposal of the Appeals from Order, Civil Applications do not survive and the same are disposed of. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)