1 FARAD CONSTITUTION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4496/2009 (Rajesh Suresh Patrale and others ..vs.. Nagpur Improvement Trust+2) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM:- B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE:- NOVEMBER 04, 2009 Heard Advocate Shri M.P.Sagdeo for the petitioners-plaintiffs. In the suit filed in the year 2000, an amendment was sought in relation to the events which took place in the year 1995. The trial court has rejected the amendment after noticing that the hearing had already commenced and there was no reason given as to why an application for amendment could not be moved earlier. I have perused the application as filed. Learned counsel has stated that the facts came to the knowledge of plaintiffs after his Advocate inspected the relevant record in December, 2008. The application does not disclose any such knowledge acquired in December, 2008. It also does not disclose 2 why the application could not be moved earlier or inspection could not be taken earlier. Even after December, 2008, the application has been moved on 22nd April, 2009. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter in writ jurisdiction as remedy of challenging said order while filing an appeal (if required) is open to the present petitioner. Hence, writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE diwale.