IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.660 of 2009 SHAGUFTA SHAHEEN Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 21.06.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the informant, who happens to be father of petitioner. The petitioner has come to this Court for quashing FIR dated 11.5.2009 vide Kishanganj Police Station case no. 122 of 2009 lodged by her father under sections 363,366A,323,504,34 I.P.C. against her husband and in-laws. She has further prayed for providing proper security. The informant, father of the petitioner submits that one Neyaz Ahmed @ Amazad and his family members kidnapped his minor girl. The State counsel submits that the petitioner has no locus standi to file the instant writ petition as she is not accused here and the same could have been filed by accused persons. Having heard the parties, I am of the view that instead of approaching this Court, the petitioner along with Neyaz Ahmed @ Amazad should appear before the Investigating officer within five weeks from today to put forth her case that she had not been kidnapped, rather she is major and has married one Neyaz Ahmed @ Amazad. The I.O. would hear the informant as well and proceed in accordance with law at the earliest. No coercive steps would be taken against the parties for their appearance before the I.O. for five weeks. - 2 - Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)