HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLESHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLESHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. Misc. Appeal (Cl No.778 of 2009 ADpellants Claimants ResDondents ORposite party Smt Neeta Chopra, aged about 40 years, wife of Vikram Chopra, aged about40years Vikram Chopra, (wrongly written as Vikram Chopra in the impugned award) aged about 50 years Both resident of Quarter No.A-6, Vish^l Nagar, Telibandha, Poliee Station Civil Line, Raipur Tahsil and- District Raipur(CG) VERSUS Neelam Namdev Ekka, aged about 34 years, son of Charls Ekka residentofF-8, Shanti Nagar, Police Station Civil Line, Raipur Tahsil and District Raipur Tahsil and District Raipur(CG) Director General of Police, Police Head Quarters, Near Raj Bhawan; Raipur(CG) Government of Chhattisgarh through Collector, Raipur (CG) ADpeal under Section 173ofthe MotorVehicle Act Present: Nonefor theappellants. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Additional Advocate General forthe State/ respondents No.2 and 3. ORDER (28thJuly, 2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellants. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are leftwith no other option, but to dismiss the appeal forwant of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge