IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CVIVIL REVIEW No.257 of 2007 ANIRUDH RAM Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A& E)II, BIHAR, VEER CHAND PATEL MARG, PATNA-1 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GOPALGANJ 5. THE CIRCLE OFFICER(ANCHAL PADADHIKARI) BAIKUNTHPUR, GOPALGANJ 6. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, GOPALGANJ ----------- 5. 11.02.2009 Heard both sides. The present application has been filed seeking review of the order dated 27.8.2007, passed in CWJC No.12945 of 2005 (Anirudh Ram Vs. State of Bihar). The order indicates that nobody had appeared on calls on behalf of the writ petitioner and the matter was considered by this Court with the assistance of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and the Accountant General. Counsel for the petitioner wants this Court to give a fresh look to the order which is not permissible in law. It has then been argued that the Court should have at least granted the writ petitioner a liberty to make an appropriate representation for remaining grievance, if any, relating to payment of his admitted post-retiral dues.. Counsel for the respondents does not object to such requests. Having considered the submissions while rejecting the present civil review application, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to make appropriate representation before the competent - 2 - authority for ventilation of the left out grievances, if any. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the competent authority to consider the grievance in the present case would be the respondent no.5, the Circle Officer(Anchal Padadhikari) Baikunthpur, Gopalganj. The application seeking review stands dismissed with the liberty aforesaid. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )