IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 16506 of 2011 Date of Decision: 06.09.2011 Ram Rati and another ..Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. Puneet Bali, Advocate, for the petitioners. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that notice to convene meeting to discuss no confidence motion, dated 30.8.2011 was served on respondent No.2 on 2.9.2011, therefore, no meeting can be held before the expiry of clear seven days from the date of service of notice. He further states that petitioner No.1 has not received any notice as yet. Mr. Bali, learned counsel for the petitioners, further states that the meeting is fixed for 7.9.2011, which cannot be held prior to seven days from service of notice. He seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh challenging the meeting, if held in violation of Rule 10 of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Rules, 1995. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE 06.09.2011 som