IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40361 of 2008 ARUN KUMAR SINHA @ PAPPU S/o- Late Vimal Prasad R/o- Village R.P.S. More near Arya Samaj Mandir Danapur, P.S. Danapur District- Patna Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Sunita Sinha, D/o- Bageshwari Prasad R/o- Mohalla Kuchagali, Ward No.9, Daudnagar P.S. Daudnagar, District - Aurangabad ----------- 2. 21.10.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Section 498A and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is the husband of the complainant and there is specific allegation of demand and torture against him. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready to keep the complainant with full dignity. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submitted that in view of the specific allegation, petitioner is not entitled to privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the same is rejected. Jagdish (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)