IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUKE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITON N0.^3^' /2005 PETITIONER:- ^^. ..^Si?' .^•^€y ^'..^\^" <"^--'"" ^ ^ESPONDENTS <0< l^ /.cpy..< ^1^'^V<^ ^"l^y ^ Shri Dhaneshwari Manava Vikas Mandal Through Hemant Thakre S/0- Shyamlal Thakre Aged about 29 years, Occupation- Assistant Professor DTianteshwari College of Horticulture Raipur, R/o- Babla Complex VIP Road Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS ^ 1) ^ 3) 4) State of Cbhattisgarh Through;- Secretary Department of Agriculture D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralay Raipur (C.G.) Vice Chancellor Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalay Krishak Nagar Raipur (C.G.) Registrar Indira Gandhi Kris hi Vishwavidyalay Krishak Nagar Raipur Chairman Board of Management Indira Indira Gandhi Kri&Ihi Vishwavidyalay Krishak Nagar Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. XI-HC-22 ^Ti^T^T f^TT^3TI^T ^qt^^f^T 3^ '<iNi<rt<<, ^Tft«<i<o, (q<')i'yy j^l^5<Ct» , _ . W^'W\ '<S^/c^- ^l^^ll »i*lich' •^^^•^•••^•^^^R^/ 200 fe^g' 3TI^T?;CT^K^f^T chi<<I<n41Ti ^HcnT^tei^t'<Ri«i< ^3rf^T3TT^T 14-9.200S Mrs. Hainida Sid4iqui, eoiiasel for fhe petitiox»r, Mr. R.R.Smba, P^niel Lawyer takes notice cm behalfof fhe respondent N<|>. 1/State. By fhis writ petit^oa, the petitioxier has questioned the propriety aad correctness of^heorders dated 4-8-2005 (Amiexure P-1) and dated 2-8-2005 (^nnexiure P-2), whereby the intake capacily of the students has| been reduc^d firom 96 to 48 and a condition has been imposed Jiat only fhe studeaite wha are bona fide residents of Chliattisga4i be admitted mid it has also been ordered fhat fhere wfll be SLO i(ianagement seat The couiisel for| fhe petitioner siibmite tfaat fhese restdctions were not iiapose4 at the time of fhe afiBliadoii and by miposiag these restrictions ti|ie petitioaer feels aggrieved as it will be diGBcult to fhe petitioner t^ get the rcqiair®lnuniber pf students aad the finaiicial iatercst ofjfhe petitioner shaU als©be afifected. The coiiasel for fhe peftitioaer fiirther submits that a representation has already ^een made by the petitfoner to fhe Reglstrar of the Umversily ax^d fhe same requires consideration by the Board of Maaagement Therefore, die respoadeat No.4 be directed to decide fhe repre^entation of the petitioiier wifhm a period of7 days. The request ma4e by fhe counsel for the petitio^er appears to be just, feir aad ^easonable, tlierefore, fhe respondent XI-HC-22 ^3[ ^q|qj€1«,^xn<1<l<o^ t^<1l^ty ^ ^^/^- ^ WRCW8Ww —^- W^ 200 3TI^T^ f^TWW^T 9FHN»^rf?c[ 9b*41<=b^f G.Singh y/ c^p 3T?^?T <$1KnW^cT No<4 is directed to decide fh^ considermg the points xaised| a period of7 (seveii) days petition staads disposed o£ Certified copy as| representatioH of fhe petltioner after Ifhereia ia acconlance wlth law wifhmi Qpixi today, On the abave texims^ tibie cM<<I<rt41'i ^i^ciT^te^i'<Ri<^i< ^3Tf^T3T1^T perrules, Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (^^r)