1H @ k; ggmh z IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.p.(S)No ztgL /2o11 PETITIONER J’Ehhabbldés Andhrawan S/o Late i Matadas Aridhrawan aged about 581 1 years occupatlon Serv1ce posted as; Head Master Pr1mary School Polml ’ Block Pandarlya, Dlstrlct Kabu‘dham ’ C.G. VERSUS ‘ RESPONDENTS « _1.- State of C.G. through the Secretaxy School Education Department , DKS Bhawan Raipur, C.G. / 2. The District Education Officer, . Kawardha, District Kabirdham C.G. / 3. The Joint Director District ' Kabirdham C.G. Treasury and Pension, Kabirdham, WRIT PETION IT ’ UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF _THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. w &: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAiiLH AT BI WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 2gl 82 of 201 EETITIONER Chhabbidas Andhrawan. VVERSUS , , RESPONDENTS State of CG? & Others. WR1T PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF ELIE CONSTITUTION OF H\IDIA g ‘l;/?» . LASPUR 1 SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K.§:Agnihotri. J. Presentr‘ ' ‘ Shri Rakesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y;S.Tha1mr,. Deputy Advocate General for the State: bRDER (ORAL) (Fassed on 27 day of April, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearulg for the petmoner on mstruchons seeks permrssron of tlns Court to wrthdraw thls petltlon w1th hberty to in the of circular dated 05.01.2011 ’ make a representation light (Annexure P/2) issued by the Government of Chhattisgarh, School ‘ Education Department. I j 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no obj ection. 3. i No permission of this Court is required to make representation to the respondent authorities. Thus, such direction cannot be issued. makes representation to the respondent However 1fthe petitioner a representation authontles the same mav be considered and decrded in accordance with law, on its own merits and perspective. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the“KW ‘ g Sd/— “ i j, SatlshJI‘fagegmhotri up V _ \f