BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Second day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9299 of 2011 1 JUSTIN JEYARAJ 2 T.VIJILA BHAMANI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING-II, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. NAGERCOIL. ( CRIME NO.06 OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. N.EDWIN JEYAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S. A.RAMAR Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners / Accused Nos.1 and 2 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 409 and 420 of I.P.C., and Section 5 of TNPD Act, 1997 in Crime No.6 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are arrayed as A1 and A2 and the first petitioner is running a chit fund in the name and style of Jyothi Finance at Karungal and the same has been closed in the month of December 2010. At the time of closure of finance Company, the petitioner is unable to pay the amount to the de-facto complainant. Hence, the de-facto complainant has given a complaint on 27.06.2011 and then, settlement was arrived and also paid Rs.13,000/- to the de-fact complainant and now apprehending for arrest. Hence, the petitioners prays for enlargment of anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the amount to be paid to the de-facto complainant, who is aged about 71 years, is Rs.13,000/- and the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of this application. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Considering the rival submissions even though the petitioners herein filed a document to show that the de-facto complainant has already been received Rs.13,000/-, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned TNPID Court at Madurai, and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial TNPID Court at Madurai, and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. untilfurther orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 02/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL TNPID COURT MADURAI 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING-II, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. NAGERCOIL. +1. CC to M/S. N.EDWIN JEYAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.25741 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9299 of 2011 Date :02/08/2011 SMA/03.8.2011/5C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/