In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh FAO No. 2442 of 2009 (O&M) Moahn Lal ... Appellant vs United India Insurance company and others .... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: None. Rajesh Bindal J. A perusal of the file shows that notice of motion had not yet been issued in the present appeal. On the last date of hearing, Mr. Pardeep Goyal, Advocate, got his presence marked for the insurance company, which is inadvertent. Ever since the appeal was filed in May 2009 and listed in the court for the first time on 18.5.2009, the same is being adjourned on the request of counsel for the appellant. Today also, at the first call, Ms. Supriya Arora, Advocate, who appeared as proxy counsel, sought adjournment saying that counsel for the appellant is in personal difficulty. Seeing the previous orders passed and finding that the appeal had been adjourned on eight occasions, the prayer for adjournment was rejected. She was requested to argue the case and on her request it was passed over. Now when the case was taken up, again no one has appeared for the appellant. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 27.4.2010 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge