IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 4684 of 2008. Decided on: 31.08.2010. __________________________________________________________ Shanti Devi. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.5. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No.5 to the post of part-time water carrier in Government Primary School, Tooeri in District Sirmaur. It appears from the pleadings that the petitioner and respondent No.5 have appeared before the Selection Committee. The Selection Committee has recommended the name of respondent No.5 for appointment to the post of part-time water carrier in accordance with the guidelines issued by the State Government vide Annexure P-1, dated 9th January, 1997. Petitioner has not alleged any malafides against the members of the Selection Committee. Once the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - suitability of respondent No.5 has been adjudged by the duly constituted Selection Committee, this Court will not sit in appeal over the same. Moreover, the averments made in the petition are vague and the same have not been substantiated by placing any material on record. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 31, 2010. (sck).