C^Ly^-. S.B. (Service Mattert IN THE mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHA'mSCSARH) WgnLPETmON (St N0. ^<^^20l0. pErrmoNER: Ru.Sunita Sone after inarriage Smt.Sunita Kavre, daughter oFShri J.P.Sone, aged about38 years» workuig as Leeturer Govt-Middle School Kodri, Block PendraRbad, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. versus Resuondents \-0."' ^^ ^^'"y '::'i ^•"'A^'1'...••" ; - • ^ •yi \. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare DepaTtinent,D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur,(2hhattisgarh. ^2. Comimssioiier, Tribal Wellare, ; Bilaspur, ehliattisgarh. ^.^-3. Joint Director, AecQunts, Treasuiy fbilUpur _ - ^ and Pension, Sswftoa-, District /yjGjlbwi. !-;C.G. (^ MRFTJ ?TmQN IJNDERARTIGLE^26 OF THE eONSTITEinOSOEINDIA sn^Fi w R-fi'* ^TT 3TT^?T ^^NT Tumane 3^ '<i|<iici'4, yiil'y'16, fs<<?iiyy —.^.1^.)..^.^1^ 311^1'q^q? ('yf-l'sl^) ^ww 'sfro aii^i SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrlkfastava. J. 18-08-2010 Shri K. 8. Pawar, counsel for the pf Shri Ajit Singh, Panel l-1eard. Learned counsel appearing fbr the| entitled to benefit of tevo advance increm^nts B. Ed. examination before her appointme(it the issue involved in the present petition has been finally decided by the Hon'bte] Saxena vs. State of MP. & Ors^ submitted that this Court has aiso 06-07-2010 passed in W.P.(S)No.3250 of| On the other hand, submission ofl State is thatthis petition has been filed wittiout Government. He prays that ifthe petitionei] will be considered on its own merits and inl , 20()9 taMn In this view of the matter, 1 am not| stage. It would be open for the petitioner making appropriate representation, claii orders referred to above. In case such rep] decide ttie same in accordance with law. With the aforesaid obsen/ations, th| 'itii^fi-iil'i *ii*n'ff'^ I^t<?l <r<^i< ^sifinail^r fetitioner. Lawyer for th^ State/respondents on advance copy. Ipetitioner submits that the petitioner is on account of she having passed at her own cost It is submitted that |s no longer res iniegra and the same ISupreme Court in the case of Asha (ttl) MPJR (SC) 59. It is further a similar view in his order dated feoio. learned counsel for the responctents- making any.approach ID ttie State would make representation, the same accordancewith law. jnclined to entertain ttiis petition atthis fo approach the State Government by m|ig parity of treatment on the basis of I'esentation is made, respondents shall s petition stands disposed of._ Sd-/ ManindraMohanShrivastava ;» , „ Judge gT)