IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30398 of 2009 1. SANTOSH SINGH 2. MINTU SINGH 3. CHANDAN SINGH 4. BANDHAN SINGH 5. PARASH SINGH 6. SUNITA DEVI 7. TARKESHWAR SINGH 8. TOTAN DEVI 9. TUMPA DEVI------PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 3.9.2009 Heard Counsel for the petitioners and the Counsel appearing for the State. Offence is alleged under Sections 341,323,307,406,325/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the informant and the accused petitioners are co- parceners. There is land dispute in between the parties. The story disclosed in the First Information Report is completely false and concocted. It has also been stated that entire family has been named as accused. Even the daughter who is residing at matrimonial home has been named. Considering these facts, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the above named - 2 - petitioners is allowed. Let the petitioners surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in Manjhi P.S. case No. 65 of 2009), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar