D B HON’BLE Mr JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR SINHA & ON’BLE Mr JUSTICE PRASHAR.IT KUMAR MISHRA WRIT APPEAL NO 7‘8l2011 APPELLANTS 1(I) Mis Dayalal Meghjl Tobacco Products Pvt Ltd A Company Incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 'havmg Its offce at DM Plaza 3'“ Floor Chhotapara ' Near Fire Brigade Ralpur through Shn Sudhlr Kumar D Mamk S/o Late Shn Daya _ Bhal Manlk aged about 63 years resudent of 34/49 ChhOtaparaj,' Near' City Kotwali, Raipur (CG) Shri Sudhir Kumar D. Manik, S/o late IShri Daya Bhai Manik, aged about 64 years, _, V “resident of 34/49 Chhotapara, Near Cit .KotwaH; Raipui (C.G.) M/s. D. Mahendra Kuma Co., a Partnership Firm . having itsj ofnce at 3K, Rupchand‘ Roy Street, Koikata, West Bengal through its partner Narotam Kathra‘ni, S/o Shri Duriabhji iKathrani aged about, 33 years resident of 3K, Rupchand Roy Street, Kolkata-7000O‘I' rNaratom Kathrani, S/o $hri Duriabhji Kathranl aged about 63 years reSIdent of 3K Rupchand Roy Street 'Koikata~700007 partner of » ’the petitioner firm 2r 3 Shn Kantiial Paratapsingh Gajbhiye, S/o Shri 'Pratap Singh Gajbhiye, about 35 years, resident of Masheii - Korchi, i arhcii, Maharashtr (ii) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR y r I ‘ ‘- ~ i : Ghroi , a 1 \ \ WRIT APISEAL NoAslzo ‘ 2 @ Versus 1 State qf ‘Chhattisgarh, Secretary, Through Department of Commercial Tax D KS Mantralay Bhawan alpur(CG) Chhattrsgarh State Minor Forest Produce (Trading Development) Cooperative Federation Ltd A-25 VIP Estate near VIP Club Khamardlh Shanker Nager,, Raipur thrbugh its Managing Director. RESPONDENTS Managingi Direcor, District Minor Forest Produce CooperatiVe Union‘ Ltd. & Conservator of Forest, Raipu'r (C;G.) ' Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Vanijyak Kar Bhawan, ’Civii Lines, Ralpur(C G) PPEAL UNDER SECTION in} OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT {APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH) ACT, 200 Appearance Mr Neelabh Dubey, Counsel for the appeliants Mr AS Kachhwaha Dy Advocate General for the respondents RAL ORDER , (06.05.2011) The following order of the Court was passed by S’unil KumarSinha, J ea o lA No 04/2011 an application for grant o permrssron to file a jomt appeal A No 04/2011 Is allowed and the aellants are permitted to file a Jomt appeal Heard on IA No 02i2011 an application for exemption- from filing certifed copy of the impugned orde n a & t ‘ O . Hrd n f pp r WRIT APPEAL NO.78I201‘1 exémpted - LA‘ from No.02/2011 filing the is cemfied allowed copy and of thlE t e impugned appeilants 9rder. are ‘ Heard on lA No 03/2011 ar‘i application for condonation of delay in tiling the appeal learned V ‘ On counsel due consideration for the parties of the we submissmns are satisfied made that the by appellants have shown suffiCIent cause for not f’ling the appeal in time and the delay in filing the appeal deserves to b condoned _ a Accordingly, lA No 03/2011 is allowed and the delayiin tiling the appeal is hereby condoned L ’ Learned counsel for the parties are also heard on admissmn This appeal is directed against a common order dated 01i 102010 passed in a batch of writ petitions Against the said common order many writ appeals including WA No 452/2010 were filed lt is stated at bar that all the writ t R” appeals filed against the common order have been dismissed by a DiViSion Bench of this Court by a common judgment dated 19‘“ of April 2011 Learned counsel for the appellants submits that this i appeal may also be dismissed/disposed of in terms of the above common judgment dated 19‘“ of April 2011 passed in V W A No 452/2010 and other connected writ appeals l ln View of the above the present Writ Appeal is dismissed in terms of the common judgment dated 19‘“ of April 2011 passed in the above batch of writ appeals ‘_ Certified copy as per rule 9 Sd/— SUNIL KUMAR SINHA l Judge 7 l t e ‘ r s ”