\A smGLE 3mm IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P. (s) No. v59“ /2o11 & Sm’r. Baijan’ree Rawnakar, W/o Tribal Development Districf Korba (C.G.) 3. ”" The Disl’ricf Collec’ror, Disfl’. Korba (6.6.) 4. The Block Developmenf Educafion Officer, Podi Uproro, Disf’r. Korba (6.6.) 5. The Superin‘rending, Pre-Mefrik Scheduled Casfe Girls Hosl'el, Podi Uproro, DisH- Korba (C.G.) m m «w ’Wl s mix w m «\x my mwwm mi m wm xmn wmxmwmw WmmummmmwmmMWrmWWWiWWmmmwwmmxmmmmmmwwwuwmwwuwmwmm ‘ Shri Mayaram Ra’rnakar‘, aged ‘/ o/iw...» about 30 years, working as C4\ "( Wafchman, R/o Pumni Bas’ri 6W" ‘ W Premnagar Ka‘rghom, Disf‘r. Korba * Q§agg§sjlgzw (C.G.) Qw . ¢b®h vERsus RESPONDENTS ‘ : 1. W STaTe of Chha‘r‘risgar'h, Through - The Secretary k‘ Scheduled CasTe & Scheduled £ Caste Depar’rmenf, D.K.S. u i Bhawan, Raipur, Dish‘. Raipur‘ (C.G.) 2.‘”“” The Assisfanf Commissioner, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA mmm mmm mm fgk‘a’1W< *Weméw ' petitioner within a period of two _w:imtaM—rm wwz/zw le— 1,50,000. SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivasmva, J. 30-09-2011 Shri Sameer Behar, counsel Tor the petitioner. Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for the State‘ Leamed counsel for the pe oner submits that the petitioner was engaged on daily wage basis as Watchman in the ofhce of Scheduled Caste Girls Hostel, Podi Uprorat District — Korba v employment was continued from time to time by issuing subsequent orders. rk has been taken from the petitioner and he is it is submitted that though w still working from February 2008, alary is not being paid to the petitioner. it is submitted that on 26/10/09, the pet ioner submitted representation to the Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Developm , Korba but till date, remuneration have not been released. Irrespective of the nature o the employment, if work has been taken from the petitioner. she is entitled to pa ment of salary as per appointment order under which, she has been appoin and continued in service. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Developme t, Korba, to whom representation has been made shall look into the matter an examine petitioner‘s claim. lf it is found that the petiti ner has been continuously working during the period, in respect of which she is [aiming salary, salary shall be released without delay and expeditiousty. The Asst tant Commissioner shall decide the claim of the nths from the date of receipt of copy of this order and whatever salary is fou d due, shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of one month thereafter. T e petitioner shall also be entitled to the interest on payment of amount of sal which is payable to her and respondent appointment order dated 3/10/07, which t' i i e e t t o a ‘3» wwmm wmm mmm sq. No.2 may alsc hoid enquiry to‘fii resp non-payment of the salary. With the aforesaid observation: s, the petition is flnaiiy disposed off. onsibmty on the oftTEEFWhms‘re‘spansibie for V mam ,1 m Sd/— Judge f ”W await v‘avimW—ivwao—z/zw ihi,sa,ooo. Manindra Mohan Shrivastava