IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10271 of 2010 SANJAY TIWARI, S/o Late Gulab Tiwary. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.13418 of 2010 PAPPU MISHRA, S/o Late Chander Mishra. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 13.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners are not named in the First Information Report. However, when they were put on Test Identification Parade they were identified by the informant and witnesses, Vijay Kumar and Sanjeev Kumar. The submission of the counsel for the petitioner is that the informant was not a competent eye-witness to identify in the Test Identification Parade. However, on perusal of the case diary it appears that Vijay Kumar and Sanjeev Kumar were also eye- witnesses, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners for the present. The prayer for bail is rejected. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)