1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.523/2010. (Baban Kisan Borude and Ors. Vs. Arjun Pandurang Kawat and Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.PV Mandlik, Sr.Counsel h/for Mr. NK Tungar, Adv. for petitioners; Mr.Amol Sawant, Adv. for Resp.Nos. 1, 3 and 4. ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 30 th September, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) Plaintiff is claiming to be owner, based on sale-deed of 1959, also asserted to be in possession of the property. 3) Both the courts, on analysis, found prima facie it is not so, did not yield to the urge of plaintiff for grant of injunction. Hence the same is subject of writ petition. 4) After substantially arguing the matter, learned Counsel for the petitioner, accepts to get the suit itself disposed of within time bound frame, without disturbing the order. Hence, order - 5) Writ Petition dismissed. The learned Judge, seized with the Regular Civil Suit No.462/2008, will ensure to 2 complete the hearing within a period of one year from receiving the writ. Both the parties to cooperate and will not seek unreasonable and unnecessary adjournments from the learned Judge. 6) The parties shall be conscious of applicability of Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/