IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 29TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 13456 of 2007(B) -------------------------- AS.268/2006 of D.C. & SESSIONS COURT,KOLLAM OPELE.3/2005 of MUNSIFF COURT, KARUNAGAPPALLY .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- CHITHRA KUMARI, W/O.PRADEEP KUMAR, RESIDING AT DHARMAPURI, FROM CHATTISSERRIL, THARAYIL, ADINADU SOUTH,ADINADU VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY. BY ADV. SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU SMT.K.SUNITHA VINOD SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNAN (MVA) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. N.VIJAYAN, S/O.NARAYAAN, VALLIYATHARAUYIL,ADINADU SOUTH, ADINADU VILLAGE,KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK. 2. STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, KERALA, L.M.S JUNCTION,TRIVANDRUM-33. 3. KULASEKHARAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, K.S.PURAM,KULASEKHARAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC,K.S.E.COMM FOR R2 SRI.JOMY GEORGE FOR R1 SRI.P.V.VENUGOPAL FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N. RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.13456 of 2007 ------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T Sri.A.N.Rajan Babu, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. In the light of the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. nj.