Crl. Misc. No.M-17796 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-17796 of 2010 Date of Decision: August 5, 2010 Chanchaljit Singh …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.P.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab. Mr.Vikas Bahl, Advocate for the complainant. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered at the instance of Amarjit Kaur alleging that the petitioner went to the house of the complainant on January 25, 2010 at about 5.00 p.m. when she was alone. He demanded a sum of Rs.200/- as loan but when complainant refused to Crl. Misc. No.M-17796 of 2010 [2] oblige him he has put a handkerchief on the nose of the complainant. She became semi-unconscious and thereafter petitioner caused injuries to the complainant with knife and scissor and thereafter took away four gold bangles and a pair of ear rings of the complainant and fled away. The occurrence was witnessed by daughter of the complainant. The name of the petitioner is mentioned as Pindu by the complainant. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the description of the accused is mentioned as Pindu, caste Gujjar. As per the contents of the FIR, Pindu had resided as a tenant under the complainant previously. The incident is stated to be of January 25, 2010. The petitioner claims that on January 24, 2010,he had, alongwith his relatives had come to Chandigarh and returned back to his village Sajjowal on January 26, 2010. There is a delay of two days in lodging of FIR. It is claimed that the complainant herself is a person of easy virtue and the people of locality have filed a complaint against her under Sections 3 and 4 of the Immoral Traffic Act, 1958. A copy of the FIR dated August 21, 2007 registered at Police Station Nawanshehar has been appended with the petition as annexure P-5. The MLR indicating the incised injuries have been manipulated by the complainant. The petition for bail was opposed by the State counsel as well as counsel for the complainant contending that there are 14 incised wounds on the person of the complainant which cannot be self-suffered. The photographs of the place of occurrence showing drops of blood and signs of Crl. Misc. No.M-17796 of 2010 [3] struggle in the house of complainant were referred to argue that the injures have been inflicted by a scissor which has been recovered from the spot. INCOMPLETE. August 5, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE