1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 473/2010 Shweta Nitin Masram ..versus.. Nitin Madhukarrao Masram =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-== Mr. S.S.Murthy, counsel for applicant. Mr. Umesh Tiwari, counsel for respondent C ORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 9th JULY, 2010. Heard. 2) The matrimonial controversies within a span of 4 months after the marriage dated 2.7.2009 made the husband to prosecute for dissolution of marriage at C.J.S.D. Buldhana. However, due to want of limitation to initiate such proceedings, it was registered as miscellaneous proceedings and thereafter converted as Hindu Marriage petition. The wife has subsequently initiated proceedings at Family Court, Nagpur, on 2nd March, 2010, seeking dissolution/divorce of the marriage. It is obvious, both are sailing in the same situation and desire severance of the relation. 3) The wife has alleged that, it is difficult for her to travel from Nagpur to Buldhana, which is far of from 2 her abode. Though this has been tried to be controverted, however, the escort which the wife is required to carry to attend the proceedings at Buldhana being difficult in its nature, the situation warrants that the proceedings initiated by the husband at C.J.S.D. Buldhana be transferred to the Family Court, Nagpur, where the wife has already initiated such proceedings. 4) Both the proceedings to be clubbed together and the parties shall appear before the learned Judge, Family Court, Nagpur, without further notice on 29 th July, 2010. Application allowed. No costs. Inform accordingly. (K.U.Chandiwal) JUDGE. Rvjalit