IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 24TH JANUARY 2008 / 4TH MAGHA 1929 R.P.No. 25 of 2008(B) ------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.25430/2007 Dated 05/12/2007 .................................. REVIEW PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------------------- K. JEEVAN, S/O. KAMACHANDRAN, BUSINESS, T.C.27/750, SIVODAYAM, VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.ANANDAKUTTAN SMT.M.HEMALATHA SRI.R.S.MADHU SRI.MAHESH ANANDAKUTTAN RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONER & 2ND RESPONDENT: ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. M.K. GEETHA KUMARI, D/O.K.KAMALAMMA, BANK EMPLOYEE, 29/MLRA,KUMARAPURAM MEDICAL COLLEGE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE PUBJAB NATIONAL BANK HOUSING FINANCE LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER, PNB HOUSING FINANCE LTD., CAPITAL TOWER, STATUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.S.MOHANAN NAIR, R2 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P. No. 25 of 2008 in W.P.(C) No. 25430 OF 2007 B = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 24th January, 2008 O R D E R The only apprehension on the basis of which this review petition has been filed is that the findings and directions in the judgment will cause prejudice to the review petitioner in the proceedings that are pending between the parties before the civil court. This apprehension is perfectly justified and hence, I clarify that the findings and directions in the judgment are only for the disposal of the writ petition and shall not prejudice the petitioner in prosecuting or defending the litigations that are pending between the parties. With these observations, review petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-