HIGH COURT (JF CHHATTISGARH AT BMSPUR WP (S) No 407sof2oos Petitioners 1. Ram naresh Mishra, Slo Shri Bhaiya La! Mishfa. aged about 37 years. Holdmg the post of peon Batram Dhruv Slo Shn Son sat Dhruv aged about 28 years pnon 1 & 2 are posted m office of Executive Engineer, R.E.$.. Bilaspur, (C.G.); Govardhan Raiput. Slo Shri Khem Singh Rajput, agod about 47 years, Peon. Fekura'm Kamai Sen s/o shri Abhiram aged abs-a: 38 years. Faun ,3&4are postedmthe offceofs DO R E S Biiaspur (C G) Versus Respondent 1. Shte of Chhaitisgarh, Through : The Deputy secretary, Panchayat' Avam Gramin Vikas Vibhag. D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). 2. Executive Enginer, Rural Enginering Services, Biiaepur, (C.G.). 3. SDO RES Bilaspur(CG) 4. Vkas Ayukta Vikas Ayukta Karyaiaya. Raipur (C G) SB: Hon‘bie Mr. Justice Saush K Agmhotri, J Shri Rajesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushii Dubey. Govt. Advocate for the respondents O R' D E' R ( Passed on this 20’“ day of March, 2007) The foilowing order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. The petitioners have hied this petition challenging the transfer order dated 1.10.2001. By virtue of the interim stay granted by the Madhya ‘Pradeah Administrative Tribunai at Raipur the petitioner is continuing at the original place of posting. Be that as it may, with the passage of time this petition has become ‘ infructuous as period of transfer is not applicable forever. At this point of time there is no question to examine the validity of the transfer. order. However, the respondents are at liberty to pass appropriat orders, keeping in view the public interest and administrative exigenoy, without insisting on compliance of the impugned transfer order. in view of the above, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri . Judge (!a Thakur . . ' . e ‘