THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5965 OF 2009 ORDER: This revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, by the petitioner/defendant, is directed against the order, dated 12.11.2009, passed by the III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, in I.A.No.604 of 2009 in O.S.No.541 of 2007. In the suit filed for eviction and damages, the petitioner/defendant filed written statement stating that he vacated the suit schedule property and delivered possession of the same to Smt. Krishnaveni, and the said fact was admitted by the plaintiff by filing a memo as per the orders in E.P.No.232 of 2004 in O.S.No.155 of 1999. Though it is stated in the written statement that the receipt obtained from Smt. Krishnaveni is handed over to his advocate for filing the same along with the written statement, but the advocate of the petitioner/defendant has not filed the same along with the written statement. Hence the petitioner/defendant filed I.A.No.604 of 2009 before the III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, under Order VIII Rule 1A of C.P.C., seeking leave to file the receipt evidencing delivery of the property. The lower Court allowed the said I.A. through the impugned order dated 12.11.2009. Hence, the present revision petition. The order so passed by the lower Court is only a discretionary order and the petitioner will have ample opportunity to contradict the receipt or its admissibility in evidence. Hence, no infirmity is discernible in the order passed by the lower Court warranting interference of this Court. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. ____________________ (A. GOPAL REDDY, J.) 17th December, 2009 Js.