IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-12482 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision : 27.7.2009 Gurmit Singh @ Pilla .....Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. B.S. Kathuria, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.B.S.Sra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab **** S. D. ANAND, J. At the time of motion hearing, the following averment was made by the learned counsel for the petitioner before a Coordinate Bench of this Court (Pritam Pal, J.). “Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that as per the investigation, sample of 25o grams from each bag was taken out for analysis whereas in the report Annexure P/5 received from the Analyst, the same has been shown to be a quantity of 100 grams which is contrary from the report submitted under Section 173 Cr.P.C. On a notice of motion being issued on the basis thereof, the learned State Counsel has had instructions. The learned State Counsel concedes the correctness of the averment noticed in the motion order. In the light thereof, it is ordered that the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned. Disposed of accordingly. July 27, 2009 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE