1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 3255/2007 Sonu Gangadhar Sarode..vs.. State of Maharashtra. Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Courts or Judge's Orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CORAM : S. R. Dongaonkar, J. Dated : 28/01/2008 Heard Mr. Bhangde, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Yengal, learnd APP for State- respondent. By this application under Section 439 of the Cr. P.C., the applicant claiming bail on the ground that almost all the prosecution witnesses have been examined and many of them have turned hostile and two witnesses, who have allegedly supported the prosecution, do not constitute sufficient evidence to come to the conclusion that the applicant is guilty of the offence charged. It is stated by the parties that the matter is fixed on 7/2/2008 for recording the evidence of all the remaining witnesses. The prosecution has filed say, stating that evidence of P.W. 14-Mahesh and P.W. 16- Rajendra is supporting the prosecution. The evidence of Investigation Officer and Dog Trainer is to be led. 2 Hence, this application is rejected. However, with a directions to the prosecution to lead the evidence of remaining witnesses on day to day basis from 7/2/2008 and with liberty to the applicant to move such application, if necessary, after the evidence of all these witnesses is recorded before the trial Judge. The application stands disposed of. Steno copy of this order be given to the learned APP. JUDGE JSA.