1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 133 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 133 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 133 OF 2007 IN IN IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 56 OF 2007 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 56 OF 2007 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 56 OF 2007 Santosh Dnyandeo Badade. .. Applicant. vs. Jayashree Santosh Badade. .. Respondent. Ms. Seema Sarnaik for Applicant. CORAM: J.N. PATEL &, CORAM: J.N. PATEL &, CORAM: J.N. PATEL &, A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE: 23RD JULY, 2007. DATE: 23RD JULY, 2007. DATE: 23RD JULY, 2007. P.C. . After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant and taking into consideration that the case is decided against the applicant after recording evidence, we do not find any justification to grant stay as the order of maintenance passed by the Family Court in favour of the children which, in our view, is a very meagre amount which hardly meets the bare necessities of life for the children and, therefore, the application is rejected. No order as to costs. (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) 2 (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. )