HI$H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. ! WP‘gS) Na. 3782 5f 2008 l'\) Pe'fi‘Hmier Kanhaiw Lal Pmel, 5/5 Shri Gavii-ud Ram PaTeL Aged about 46 year's, Occupnfion working as Assismm‘ 6mm Panchuya'r Offiazr' Jarupad Panchaya'u‘, Kharsia, DisTr-ict- Raiqarh ((1.53 Versus Respm1den1's 1. Sm‘fz of Chi-.a-H‘isgarh, Thmugh kcrefary, Panchnya? and Welfare Depar‘mxem, D.K.5. Bhawam‘ Raipur‘ (CE) Direc‘ror, Panchaya‘r and Soda! Weh‘ai‘e, Raipur (6.6.) 3. The CaHecmi-v, Raigarh, Dis‘h‘ic‘f — Raigarh (CI-3.) The Collector; Ambikapur‘ DisfricT - 5arguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UMBER ARTICLE 22$ 0? THE CONSTITUTION OF 1NDIA SB: Han’blz Mr. Jus+ica safish K. AgnEhMri, J Shri A‘ K‘ Airhigy, Advamfa for Th5 petitioner; Shri Yashwa'n'r Singh Thakur, Dzpu‘ry Advaca‘hz Gereml far- +112 respandei1+s ORAL ORDER (Fassed on fhis 18% day of Juiy, 2008) h; . Wi-kh “Hue aonsen+ af i412 appearing par-rags #ha ma++ar= is kmrd' fimHy. )N The pz'ri'rionar has fiied fhis pa+i+ian being aggrievza‘ by +he +mr1§f2r order 'dm‘aé 27.6.2008 (Armexum P/l), whereby +he pefifiomr, wha was warkirg as Assis-fairg' éram Panchaya‘f Officer in Jaripad Panchaya‘f Khar-siya, Dis'tric'r Raigar-h has been +mi1sfer-Fad +5 Janpad r Thakur' l Pmdmya‘f Exhankwgarh, Dis'i'i‘ic‘r Surgu‘jn' in +512 same capacify ah adminisi'm'fivz graund. Lear‘nad caunse! appearmg for- ‘Hm p2+i+iai1er submi+s +ha'.‘ 'r'ne pea‘ifioruer‘ challanges ‘Hw impu%ad Transfer arder- or: fha grourid a‘ha‘.‘ H is a case of frequen'r fmnsfar, as fhe pai‘H‘it-ner- was #ansfermd' earlier ar. 8.9.2004 fr—am Kushuwabnhari +6 Sawmgarh and +har€af+er cm 8.6.2005 frarn 5amrigarh fa KE-Im‘sia. H2 submia‘s +haf 1412 wife af ‘Hne p2+i+ianer~ is rm? we“. The +mnsf2r— af an emplayzz af-hzr a per-ind af 'Hwaa yaears cama+ bz held as frequarrr ‘haansfer‘. :F'na 69:12? gmurtd of persaml problem car. be caasidzr‘a' by $2 emplayar. Haviag heara‘ {gamed caunse! appaar-ing for ‘rhe pe?i1‘iaaar aad perusiag $2 pizadiags and dacumeni‘s aapendzd +hera+a, I am 0f we apiaiaa #Jaa'r H' is mi” a casa which warmafs ia‘fer-fareacz wifh 'l'he +ransfer arder. If is we.” se'r-Héd pa§nciphz af law fha‘r wansfzr is an incidence af service and i‘i is far 'H'ie empiayer +0 decide asi’a where a pariicuiar— afficeF/empiayee e aasied, keepiag ia view pubiic ia‘ieresf as we” ll as adminisira‘i’ive exiaea -v. ‘ J I This Caua'i has iimi‘ied jurisdic'iiaa fa in‘ierfere ia ihe faaasfer- ma‘r‘ier- and 'ii-iis Caum‘ car. infer-fare only in fhe cases af proved inala fide, nan-compe‘ience of aail-iani‘ry passing fi'ie frans-fer- order- and +ransfer= arder- na'l’ being in canfaamiiy wi‘ll‘. +l1e Fall’s. and regula'l'ians. Nane af 'il-ie above graunds are available +0 flie pei’ii’ianer’. In view af ihe faregaing, ihis pe‘ii'lian is dismissed, summarily. Na ‘ Sd/— s‘ Satish KAgmheai ar-der- as fa cas-i . Judge 1;. ,