IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14756 of 2009 1. MD.RASHID HUSSAIN, son of Md. Abid Hussain, resident of village- Mahuaba, P.S.-Piprahi, District-Sheohar 2. Md. Mahfuz @ Chunnu, son of Abdul Khaur-------------------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 30.6.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and the State. There is claim and counter claim by the parties about Scorpio which was in existence. According to the informant, same was sold to him, possession was given but no paper was supplied. The vehicle was returned but money advanced for this Scorpio was not returned. While the case of the defence is that the vehicle was handed over to him for plying on fare. That was also done for one and a half months but no money was paid and false allegation is leveled. The third one is if the Scorpio was a stolen one both the parties, i.e., informant as well as accused were liable for having a stolen vehicle and to save the skin they are making claim and counter claim. Money, if any, was paid but there is no paper for the same and whereabouts of the Scorpio is still a matter for investigation. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Sheohar, in connection with Sheohar P.S. - 2 - case no.138 of 2008 , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. However, at the time of framing of charge bail so granted to the petitioners shall be reconsidered. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )