IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH JUNE 2010 / 9TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 16582 of 2010(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.M.KOUMARI,AGRICULTURAL ASSISTANT AGRICULTURAL OFFICE,' KRISHI BHAVAN', AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, THRISSUR. MR.ARAVIND KUMAR BABU, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.16582 of 2010 (W) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 30th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner was an accused in a criminal case for the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Consequently, she was placed under suspension and thereafter was reinstated in service. According to the petitioner, thereafter no action has been taken against her. Her grievance is that the suspension period has not been regularized. It is seen that she has moved the respondent by filing Ext.P5 in this behalf. Orders on Ext.P5 also have not been passed. It is in these circumstances, this writ petition has been filed. 2. Going by the pleadings it is evident that the respondent has not considered the issue of regularization of the suspension period of the petitioner. This being the situation, it is directed that the respondent will consider Ext.P5 and orders thereon will be passed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. WP(C) No.16582/2010 -2- The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the respondent for compliance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg