IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS LETTERS LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 126 OF 2006 PATENT APPEAL NO. 126 OF 2006 PATENT APPEAL NO. 126 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1594 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1594 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1594 OF 2006 GTL Limited. ] .. Appellant (Ori.Petitioner) Versus 1. Maharashtra Rajya Rashtriya Kamgar ] Sangh & Anr. ] .. Respondents Mr. J.P. Cama, senior counsel with Mr. A.K. Jalisatgi for the appellant. Mr. S.M. Oak for respondents. CORAM: R.M. LODHA & A.S. BAGGA, JJ. DATED: 13TH JUNE, 2006 P.C. : . After having heard the senior counsel for the appellant, we are satisfied that no interference is called for in the impugned order. Suffice it to clarify that the order passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Thane on 10th February, 2006, shall be read in the light of the observations made by the learned Single Judge in paragraph 31 of the impugned order dated 29th March, 2006. : 2 : 2. With the aforesaid observation the Appeal is dismissed in limine. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [A.S. [A.S. [A.S. BAGGA, J.] BAGGA, J.] BAGGA, J.]