g/f HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH EILA$PUR kkk £6 / £3 Criminaa Revasion (PR) No.113 af 2mm A?PL!CANT Narmada Bai Wfo Narendra @ Nem COMPLAINANT Singh, aged about 26 years, Rio Viilage ~ Jogipur, Tahsii and Police Station .- Mungeli, District — Biiaspur (0G) Versus NON-A?PLICANTS 1‘ Siate of Chhatiisgarh, thmugh PROSECUTION District Matgistrate, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) A$CUSED 2. Nem Singh S/o Tatua Singh, aged about 28 years, 3. Tarn Singh S/o late Shri Janak Singh, aged about 48 years, 4. Basanta Bai W/o Tam Singh, aged about 45 years, 5. Dhirendra Singh S/o Tam Singh, aged about 23 years, 6. Chameli Bai W/o Dhirendra Singh, aged about 2O years, Non- appiicants No. 2 to 6 are R/o Viiiage —- Chorbhatha, near Gayatri Mandir, Poiice Station Mungeli, District Biiaspur (C.G.) Crimitiai Revision Under Seetion 397/401 at the Criminal Procedure Code. Present: Shri Sunii Sahu counsei for the aoplicant Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panei Lawyer for tbe Statei non— appiicant No.1. Singie Bench: Hon’bie Mr. T.P. Shanna, J ORAL ORDER (2o-01 -2ooe) This petition is directed against the judgment dated 28—03-2008 passed by' Judiciat Magistrate First Ciass, Biiaspur in Criminai Case @Q ggéj No.654/2006 whereby ihe Judiciai Magistrate First Ciass has acquitted the non-applicant No.2 to 6 of the offence punishable under Section 498-A of the LP.C. Against the said judgment Criminaf Revision No.88/2008 was preferred by the applicant before the Special Judge (Atrocity), Bilaspur which came to be dismissed on 03-10-2008. 2‘ Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he seeks to withdraw the present criminai revision with iiberty to file a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Nsw T. P. Sharma Judge r i Kvr