IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No. 6789 of 2008 Between: 1 B. Durga Nageswar Rao, S/o. B. Ramakrishna Rao, Working in Accountant General Office, Hyderabad. 2 P. Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Late P. Ramulu, Working in Accountant General Office, Hyderabad. 3 P. Damodar Naidu, S/o. Late Damodar Naidu, Working in Accountant General Office, Hyderabad. 4 T. Narsimha Reddy, S/o. T. Ramakrishna Reddy, Working in Accountant General Office, Hyderabad. 5 Mohd. Osman, S/o. late Mohd. Ghouse, Working in Accountant General Office, Hyderabad. 6 M. Gurudevaiah, S/o.M.G. Brahmaiah, Working in Accountant General Office, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Food & Agriculture, (Coop-IV) Department, Hyderabad. 2 The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad,. 3 The District Co-operative Officer, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. 4 The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. 5 The Divisional Co-operative Officer, Secunderabad Division, Secunderabad. 6 The Accountant General Office Co-operative Housing Society Limited, Rep. by its President, A.G'S Office, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, directing the respndents 1 to 5 not to extend the term of the present managing committee of the 6th respondent society and further direct the respondents to conduct elections to the 6th respondent society forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for Respondents 1 to 5: GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel for Respondent No.6: SRI B.NALIN KUMAR The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.6789 of 2008 ORDER: Ms. Manjula, learned counsel representing Sri P.Krishna Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ____________ C.V. RAMULU,J 27.02.2009 v v