IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30771 of 2011 Allauddin Shah @ Tenia @ Tinkua, son of Late Lall Mohammad Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 19.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 307, 427/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections ¾ of Explosive Substance Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner has misused the privilege of bail and has remained in custody since 1.10.2010 and in the intervening period, he has not committed any anti social activity. From the order impugned, I find that the case was fixed for charge. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-III, Begusarai, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 155 of 2002 arising out of S. Kamal P.S. Case No. 166 of 2001 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be he mother of 2 the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)