CRP 497/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI Heard Mr. S.S. Sarma, learned Senior Counsel, appearing on behalf of the defenda nts-petitioners, and Mr. S. Sarma, learned counsel for the plaintiff-opposite pa rty. Aggrieved by the order, dated 25.11.2010, passed in Title Suit No.483 of 2007, w hereby the learned Munsiff No.4, Kamrup, Guwahati, has rejected the defendants-p etitioners’ petition seeking a direction to summon, as witnesses, Civil Sherista dar and Dealing Assistant of the Court of Munsiff No.1, Kamrup, Guwahati, on the ground, inter alia, that the petition, seeking to call the witnesses aforementi oned, has been made at a belated stage and no reasonable cause could be shown fo r making such a belated petition, particularly, when the defendants had closed t he evidence after obtaining several adjournments. On being pointed out by this Court that if this revision is not allowed, the pet itioners may be able to agitate this issue in appeal if the suit happens to be d ecided against the defendants, Mr. S. S. Sarma, learned Senior Counsel, submits that this revision may be allowed to be withdrawn by the petitioners with libert y granted to them to challenge the legality and correctness of the order, dated 25.11.2010, in the appeal, should such an occasion arises. To the submissions so made, no objection has been raised by the plaintiff-opposite party. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this revision is disposed o f as withdrawn with liberty granted to the defendants-petitioners to put to chal lenge the legality and validity of the order, dated 25.11.2010, if the suit, in question, is decided against them. No order as to cost.