1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.30 OF 2007 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.69 OF 2005 Shaikh Jaibunnisa Abdul Latif & Ors. ..Applicants. V/s. Niranjan Singh Bajaj & ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Sagar Joshi for applicants. Mr.R.S.Apte for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : FEBRUARY 28, 2007. DATE : FEBRUARY 28, 2007. DATE : FEBRUARY 28, 2007. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Not on board. Upon production taken on board. 2. Heard counsel for the parties. I am in agreement with the objection taken by the counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 5 that no indulgence should be shown in favour of the applicants in the fact situation of the present case. This is so because sufficient time was given to the applicants on the earlier occasion. The applicants gave undertaking before this Court. Thereafter, applicants carried the matter before the Supreme Court, which came to be rejected. The applicants moved this Court for 2 review, which application also was rejected. Inspite of sufficient time available to the applicants and in particular undertaking given before this Court, if applicants have not made any other arrangement no further indulgence can be shown. Application is rejected.