Petitiohers 1 . ‘HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DEVISION BENCH jcioram : HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV gupTA', gJ.‘ & ‘ HoN’BLE SHRI sumL KLfMAR sINHA, J. Writ Petition (PIL) No. 1829 off 2009 i axmi Narayanl Bhate S/o Late Mohamau Bhaiej aged about 4 years, R/o Azad Chowk Patan, Tahsil Patan, District Durg (C.G.) Vinod Bagh ’S/o Shri Buti Ram Bagh, aged abbut 33 years, R/o Nagar Panchayat Ward No.1 Patan Tahsil Patan, Distréct Dur (C.G.) Versus Krishna Kumar Bhale Slo Shri ukhhain Bhale, aged about.50 year resident Nagar Panchayat Patan Sala Vikash Samiti Patan Tahsi! atan District Durg (C.G.) Rio agar Panchayat & Shaiav ka Samiti Patan, Tahsil Patan, istri Durg (C.G.) BR. Jariya Sfo Shri Kashi Ram Jriya, aged about 52 years, Prncipai Govt. High School Patan, Tahsii Patan, District Durg (C.G.) Sub Divisionai Officer Patan, ahsii atan, district Durg (C.G.) Tasiidar Tahsil Patan Disirict Durg C.G.) ub gistrar Patan, Tahsii Paa, District Durg (C.G.) tte 9f Chhattisgarh, Through icbr DUrgv, District 'Durg (C.G.) - RESPONDENTS L 9 g Sc s P & P N Vis Dct h ha i T P h ( S Re tn Sa Coiet WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2 61227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Preéént: , é None Shri V.V.S. forthe Murthy, petitioners. learned ‘ DeLuty Advocate General with Shri Akhi! Agrawal, Iearned Pane! Lawyer for the State/ respondents No. 3 to 6. 1 ORDER i f (20m July, 2099) éThe following order of {he Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: None for the petitioners. On 21-04—2009 and 17-06-2009 also Ihere was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. p - ”“5“ i ‘ i Sd/-‘ Sunil Kuniar Sinha ’ Judge . Sd/- ‘ Chief Justice