IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION No.5892 OF APPLICATION No.5892 OF APPLICATION No.5892 OF 2005 E.S. I. Corporation, Mumbai I. Corporation, Mumbai I. Corporation, Mumbai .... .... .... Applicant Applicant Applicant Vs. Vs. Vs. The Orient Club, Mumbai. rient Club, Mumbai. rient Club, Mumbai. ......... Respondent Respondent Respondent Mr. H. V. Mehta, advocate for applicant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Perused the Civil Application. By this Civil Application, the applicant is seeking condonation of delay. For the reasons set out in the Civil Application, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no cause of inaction, negligence or want of bona fide on the part of the applicant. Hence, Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer Clause (a). [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]