BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Eighth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13754 of 2011 1 M. SHANMUGA PRIYA 2 V. SHANMUGAMPILLAI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL TOWN, DINDIGUL, CRIME NO.25/2011. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.DEENADAYALAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for offences under Sections 498(A), 406 and 506(ii) 307 IPC in Crime No.25 of 2011, the petitioners have come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, the petitioners are the relatives of the first accused. It is the allegation that the petitioner joined with the husband of the de-facto complainant and demanded dowry and harassed her. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the first accused was arrested and released on bail on 07.09.2011 itself. The accused Nos.2 to 5 have also been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11733 of 2011 on 23.09.2011. He would further submit that the petitioners also stand in the same footing. 4. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances of the case. I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police and when required for the purpose of interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. sd/- 28/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II DINDIGUL 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL TOWN, DINDIGUL +1. CC to M/S. R.DEENADAYALAN Advocate SR.No.36791 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13754 of 2011 Date :28/10/2011 SMA/31.10.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/