IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17928 of 2011 Ratnakar Jha, S/o Late Atul Chandra Jha, Resident of Sipahi Tola, Chunarpur Road, P.O. – Madhubani, P.S. – Khajanchi Hat, District – Purnea. …….. Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Vice-Chancellor, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 3. Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur through its Registrar, District – Bhagalpur. 4. The Auditor, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 5. The Auditor, for the State of Bihar, posted at Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 6. The Principal, K.D.S. College Gogari, P.S. – Gogari, District – Khagaria. ……… Respondents ---------------------------------- 2 13.10.2011 Heard Sri Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rakesh Ambashtha, learned A.C. to Additional Advocate General No. 15, who appears on behalf of Respondent No. 1 & 5 / State of Bihar and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 2, 3 & 4 / Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. The petitioner, who retied with effect from 31.10.2000, from the post of “Professor”, Department of Philosophy from K.D.S. College, Gogari, Khagaria, under Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, has prayed for directing the Respondents to revise his pension in view of U.G.C. Scale and pay (a) Arrear of Leave Encashment, (b) Arrear of un-deposited provident fund, (c) Arrear amount of Group Insurance, (d) Arrear of difference amount of salary as per U.G.C. Scale 2 (revised pay scale) from July 1982 to October 2000, (e) Arrear amount of Gratuity, (f) Arrear amount of 50% merger of D.A., (g) other admissible dues attached to the post concern. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that so far revision of pension and merger of 50% Dearness Relief are concerned, this court has already decided the issue in C.W.J.C. No. 3616 of 2010 (Dr. Himanshu Bhushan Vs Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur & Ors.) and other connected writ petitions. Accordingly, the claim of revision of pension and merger of 50% Dearness Relief stands allowed in terms of the order dated 03.12.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 3616 of 2010 (Dr. Himanshu Bhushan Vs Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur & Ors.). Regarding remaining reliefs, the petitioner is granted liberty to file a detailed representation before Respondent No. 2 /Vice-Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, the Respondent No. 2 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. If the Respondent No. 2 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass 3 order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, the Respondent No. 2 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within four months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction the writ petition stands disposed of. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)