IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29965 of 2009 JATA SHANKAR RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 6.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that though the petitioner is husband and has been alleged for causing cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry but the demand of dowry cannot be believed as it is Rs. 20,000/- in complaint petition while on S.A. there is allegation of demand of motorcycle and T.V. also. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, complainant herself left the matrimonial house. A suit for restitution filed on his behalf in which reconciliation failed as the complainant refused to accompany this petitioner. In the circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in Complaint Case No. 1285-C of 2007, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)