IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4431 OF 2004 Ayub Khan Hamid Khan ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mrs.Farhana Shah for Applicant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. OCTOBER 21, 2004. OCTOBER 21, 2004. OCTOBER 21, 2004. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. 2. I see no reason to depart from the view taken by the Court below while rejecting the Bail Application preferred by the Applicant herein. I am in agreement with the reasons recorded by the Court below. The record relied by the A.P.P. supports this position. The offence for which the : 2 : Applicant is charged, is a serious offence. In the circumstances, this Application is rejected. However, the Court below is directed to expedite the trial. The trial be earmarked to fast track Court to ensure early disposal. 3. The Applicant shall extend full co-operation for the early disposal of the trial. In case, the Trial Court is of the opinion that the Applicant is responsible for the delay of the trial, that fact be recorded in the Roznama. 4. Application disposed of accordingly. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.