wnr‘oum 6F CHHATTISGARH AT BlLASPg 1gle Bench : ‘ Petitioner sxo Late KL. Uikey, ja, s, Distt‘ R/o Durg Village C.G.)A Saja, Post versus 1; Rt esgonden State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretaiy, Pane Welfare Department, Raipur (CG). Director , Panch Raipur (C. G.) Dy, Director: Welfare, Ddrg, Di Chief Executive hayat & Social D.K.S. B ' ayat and Social Welfare, Panchayat and Sepia: strict Durg (CG). anchayat Saja, Distt. Durg Officer, (CG). Janpad l PETlTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE \ ORAL ORDER Passed on 17'" November, 2007 Heard oh admission, c & e a r ( P T CO ( } pointedw asked from learned counsel for the petitioner, as to whether the aforesaid WP‘ No‘ 2619/2004 is pending or not, learned counsel for the ’petitione'r repiies that the said Writ petition is afso pending before the High Court. in view of the pendency of the earlier writ petition, l am not inclined to admit this fresh writ petition for hearing. The petition is dismissed atthe motion stage itself, However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to take appropriate steps by filing appropriate application in the pending writ petition and the order passed in this writ petition shall not come in the way of such action taken by the petitioner. 'Sunil Kumar Sinha' Judge Sd/-