(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6505 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6505 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6505 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1914 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1914 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1914 OF 2005 Kirloskar Investments & Finance Ltd. and Ors. ...Applicants Versus Silikon Silk Mills (Exports) Ltd. and another ...Respondents ..... Mr. N.V. Pradhan i/b Ms. Shubhada Khot, Advocate for Applicants Mr. Girish Kulkarni, Adv. for Respondent No.1. Ms. S.V. Gajare, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 7TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED: 7TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED: 7TH OCTOBER, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant, learned advocate for the respondent No.1 i.e. original complainant and the learned A.P.P.for the State. 2. Sufficient cause has been made out for restoration of Criminal writ petition No.1914 of 2003, hence, the writ petition No.1914 of 2003 is restored to file. (-2-) 3. It is stated by the learned advocates for both the sides that the settlement is being worked out between the parties. In this view of the matter, interim relief granted in the said petition is also restored. 4. Application is disposed of. *****