IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 30TH MARCH 2009 / 9TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 9683 of 2009(O) ---------------------------------- OS.133/2002 of SUB COURT, OTTAPPALAM .................... PETITIONER : ---------------- EDEENA SUKUMARAN W/O. UPPARAPERUMBARIL SUKUMARAN, BHEEMANAD AMSOM AND DESOM, MANNARKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN SRI.PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR RESPONDENT : ----------------- ALAVI HAJI S/O. CHOLASSERRYIL AYIDRU, MANKADA AMSOM, CHERIYAM DESOM, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.9683 OF 2009 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of March, 2009 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the interim direction issued in the writ petition, copy of the order dated 23.03.2009 was issued and therefore, the main relief sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. However, the counsel submits that the petitioner intends to challenge the order and therefore, the interim order staying the trial of the suit for 10 days granted on 25.03.2009 may be directed to be continued in force. 2. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of recording that since certified copy is issued, the main relief has become infructuous. However the interim order dated 25.03.2009 staying the trial of the suit for a period of 10 days shall be in operation till the expiry of that time to enable the petitioner a breathing time to challenge the order in appropriate proceedings. K.T.SANKARAN JUDGE pac