^JNfilE 8ENSO IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0..<&b^../2010 PBTITIONER RESPONDENTS /:^-< ^.••- ^^ 7\^l Vikas Puri S/o. Shri Raj Kumar Puri, aged about 25 years, R/o Village and Post Birnipali, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through -the Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 3. District Education Officer, Raigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.) 4. The Collector, Raigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.) 5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Baramkela, District - Raigarh (C.G.), WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THfi COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^ ...<<tw ..•^^' ^o x ,..f(^!.;>" ,.• VA^^' • -,v ^^ss^ ./^^. ^' NWW ?o*ie^» 's^sr^w^f, w^twi^, T^^w(f< .^.S.&l^..L^3.'2d^. ^FT200 ^TI^T TR^ (xi?i^<i^) ^n^i'^T ^i<^ '^H^T^T^T^N ^ I^fTW^cf 3?i^T 3B : Hon'bie Shri rvlanindra Rfiohan Silrivastava. J, 29-07-2010 Shri R. S. Patel, counsei for the Shri Satish Gupta, Government hfeard. The petitioner has filed this p^i Assistant Teacher, lwho died vvhile compassionate appointment and he h^ Shiksha Karmi Grade-iii. The petitioner| as Assistant Teacher accordi'ng to the p4 Learned State counsei submitted; gjven an opportunity of fiiing the respondent authority, which may be With JSVv. Having considered and without case, in the opinjon ofthis Court, ends to the petitioner to make a detaiied repji competent respondent authority aiong vvit'nin six vveeks from today, and on 3u| respondent authority shaii deciae the sai| as eariy as pGssibl'e, preferabiy withinl receipt of tne representation. if any the remedy avaiiabie under the Saw. Vv'ith the aforesaid observations, Certified copy as per rules. <^Nfd41^ 'R'Fi^f ^'fe^ Tf^?R iTsffro^i^T ij/etttjoner. ^dvocate for the State. p^tition ors the ground that he is a ward of )n servlce. He moved an applicatlon for ss been given appointment on the post of Isubmirted that he is entitled to be appointed |)iicy. iitte(p that for the present, tne petjtioner may be det^iied representation before the competent c^nsjdered on its Ovvn merits. in accordance Ixpressing any opinion cn the merits of the c|fjustice vviil be served, if a directlon is given resentstion raising his grievance before the ^vith a copy of the petition and tnis order, ;h representation being filed, the competent i|ne on its Ovvn merits in accordance with lavv, a period of four months from the date of gri€tvanoestiil remains, the petitioner may avail u:s petition stands disposed of. Sd/- ManindraMohan Shrivastava Judge ^rra^r sN^r %^rr^t, r^<Frk —FS/I47—2/201o—i ,00,000.