IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19178 of 2010 MUKTESHWAR NATH RAI, son of Late Prahlad Rai, resident of Village-Chaukiya, P.S.- Krishna Brahm, District-Buxar. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The D.G. of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3. The S.P., Katihar. 4. The Finance Commissioner, Bihar, Patna. 5. The Director, Provident Fund, Bihar, Patna. 6. The A.G., Bihar, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 25.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 30th of June, 2010, no retiral dues have been settled and paid to him till date. It is submitted that the petitioner was suspended three days prior to his retirement. However, the suspension was revoked on 31st of July, 2010 as would be appearing from Annexure 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even if the departmental proceeding may have been initiated against the petitioner, he is entitled to admissible dues as permissible under the rules. Learned counsel for the State submits that the grievances of the petitioner would be considered as per the rules without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner had represented for payment of retiral dues, but for expeditious disposal of his - 2 - grievances as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the S.P., Katihar (respondent no.3), with a copy each to respondents no.2, 5 and 6. In case such a representation is filed stating distinctly the details of his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so as to enable the petitioner to receive the admitted dues, if any, with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)