1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3173 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.1550 OF 1997 Chandulal Prataprai Mehta and Anr. .. Plaintiffs Versus M/s.Ponds (India) Ltd. & Ors. .. Defendants Mr.Nitin Ghawane i/b. Ajit Karawande for plaintiffs Mr.Yogesh Adhia for defendant No.3 CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 21st October 2008 P.C. . Considering the reliefs claimed in the plaint and reading the written statement as a whole, it is not possible to agree with the learned Counsel for plaintiffs that any admissions have been made on the basis of which the entire suit can be disposed of. Prayer clause (a) cannot be granted and that appears to 2 be apparent to the plaintiffs also because they claim alternate reliefs in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c). It is not possible to grant prayer clause (b) as well only on the basis of one paragraph in written statement. Notice of motion is, therefore, misconceived and is accordingly disposed of. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)