THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24516 of 2004 DT.23.08.2011 Between: A.Ramachandra Babu … Petitioner And The Special Court under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad and ors … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.P.Radhive Reddy Counsel for respondent: The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24516 pf 2004 O R D E R:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) The petitioner is the respondent No.2 in LGC.172 of 1997, on the file of the Special Court Under A.P Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act at Hyderabad, which was filed by the 3rd respondent herein Jitta Bhargavi claiming to be the absolute owner of the application schedule property to an extent of 684-05 sq yards bearing Plot No.24/7 in Sy.No.7 of Saroornagar village, Ranga Reddy District. It is stated that the applicant/3rd respondent herein purchased the said property vide Registered sale Deed dated 20-12-1995 and was in her possession and enjoyment, and the respondents 1 to 16 and 18 to 21 have grabbed her property in the month of August 1997. The said application was allowed by the Special Court by vide Judgment and decree dated 26-10- 2004, holding that the respondents grabbed her property i.e., the schedule property without any lawful entitlement, and accordingly, directed the respondents to vacate the schedule property and deliver vacant possession of the same to the applicant whereas aggrieved by the same, the 2nd respondent therein alone has filed this writ petition. This Court by order dated 29-12-2004 has directed the parties to maintain the status quo of the property. As none has appeared on 11-8-2011, the matter is listed for dismissal on 16-8-2011. Even on 16-8-2011 none has appeared when the matter is called, as such, it is posted to today. Even today none has appeared when the matter is called. The L.G.C was originally filed against 9 respondents, and during the pendency of the L.G.C, as the 4th respondent died, his legal heirs were brought on record as the respondents 11 to 14, and the respondents 15 to 21 were impleaded in the case as per orders of the Special Court in different applications. It is to be noted that the petitioner was shown as the 1st respondent in the L.G.C alone as the 2nd respondent in the writ petition without impleading the other respondents. There is no specific finding that the 2nd respondent herein alone has grabbed the property and, in fact, the 2nd respondent is only the purchaser of the property of other land grabber. The judgment of the Special Court is inseparable as it is alleged that all the respondents grabbed the land. The order of the Special Court has become final against all the other respondents including the respondent No.1 in the L.G.C, who is the respondent No.2 herein, whereas the 5th respondent herein, is subsequently impleaded in the writ petition as he is stated to have purchased the LGC schedule property, against whom the writ petition is dismissed as per the orders of this Court dated 18-6-2011. Since the writ petition is dismissed against the respondents 2 and 5 herein by the orders of this Court dated 18-6-2011 and the judgment in L.G.C.No.172 of 1997 has become final and is inseparable, the petitioner is not entitled to have a different relief from that of the relief granted by the Special Court. For the foregoing reasons, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ________________ (V. ESWARAIAH,J) _________________________ (G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY,J) DATE:23-08-2011 grk THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY (The order of the Bench pronounced by Hon’ble Sri justice V.Eswaraiah) WRIT PETITION No.24516 pf 2004 DATE:23-08-2011