1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 199 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 2304 OF 2004 Satyanarayan M. Malpani & Anr. ....Plaintiffs Versus M/s. TATA Iron & Steel Co. Ltd & Ors. ....Defendants .... Ms.Neeta Solanki i/by Kiran Jain for the plaintiffs. Mr.Prakash Goria i/by S.D.Raje for defendant no.1. .... CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATE : 16th FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C. : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the Plaintiffs and Defendant no.1. 2. The above chamber summons is taken out by the plaintiffs to amend the cause title of the suit and incidental and consequential amendments in the plaint as per the Schedule annexed to the Chamber Summons. 2 3. The amendment is not opposed by the learned Counsel appearing for defendant nos. 1 & 2. In view of the above facts and for the reasons in the affidavit-in-support, the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). 4. Necessary amendments be carried out by the plaintiff within a period of two weeks from today and amended copy of the plaint be served on the defendants within further period of two weeks. (R. V. MORE, J.)