@ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DB: Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra & Hpn’ble Shri Ranqnath Chandrakar , JJ. Writ Petition (C) No. 1862/2011 Petitioner M/s. Uttam Singh Sisodia, A-4 Class Contractor and General Order Supplier, Through : Partner Nitesh Singh, S/o. Jashwant Singh, aged about 29 years, R/o RaghukuL in front of cold Storage, Bhagwanpur, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G‘) Vs. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District— Raipur (0G1) 2. Commissioner, Nagar Paiika Nigarm, Ambikapur Distt. Surguja (C.G.) 3. Collector Surguja, Ambikapur, Distt‘ Surguja (0G,) Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Respondents Present: Shri. Shakti Raj Sinha, counsel for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the State/respondent No. 1 and 3. Smt. Hamida Siddiqui, counsel for respondent No. 2, 0 R A L O R D E R (Passed on 07'“ April, 201 1) Per Dhirendra Mishra, J Heard. 1. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the action of respondent/Municipal Corporation for not providing tender form to the petitioner on the ground that he does not fulfill the eligibility criteria as mentioned in condition No. 3 of the tender notice, whereas the other tenderors who also do not fulfill the aforesaid condition were issued tender forms. 2. Smt. Hamida Siddiqui, learned counsel, on instructions from Municipal Corporation submits that in the meanwhile the tender committee has already recommended to cancel the tender process on 30.03.2011 and to invite fresh tender. Recommendation is to be placed before the Mayor—in—Councili Having heard learned counsel for the parties, having regard to the statement m”ade by learned counsei for respondent/Corporation; the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. . Sd/— Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra R.N. GIANDRAKAR. Judge i Judge