IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32100 of 2009 GOPAL KUMAR SWARNKAR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3. 12.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 379/411 of the Penal Code is that he was not aware of the nature of the origin of the ornament and that he is not named in the F.I.R. Counsel for the State points out from the case diary that the petitioner has an antecedent of two more cases under the Penal Code. The Court is not persuaded to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail because of his antecedent. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered on its own merits, without being prejudiced by the present order. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)