: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2019 OF 1995 Pandurang @ Shrirang Madhav Reddy ... Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.P.A. Pol for Petitioner Mr.A.I. Patel, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3 Mr.G.M. Khambete for Resp. No.4 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 13th JULY, 2009 P.C.: 1. This petition has been filed against the order dated 7.4.1995. By this order, the Petitioner’s eating house licence as well as the licence for running a lodging and boarding house were not being renewed. These licences were issued to the petitioner under Bombay Police Act, 1951. The main reason for non-renewal of the licences was because of the objections raised by Respondent No.4, the sister of the Petitioner. 2. Mr.Khambete, appearing for Respondent No.4, states on instructions from Respondent No.4 that she no longer has any objection if the aforesaid licences are renewed in the name of the petitioner. : 2 : 3. When the petition was admitted, interim relief was granted to the petitioner in terms of prayer clause (c) i.e. the operation and execution of the impugned order dated 17.4.1995 had been stayed. According to the learned advocate for the Petitioner, the licences have been renewed from time to time in the name of the petitioner thereafter. 4. In view of the fact that Respondent No.4 is not pressing her objection for the renewal of the licences issued to the petitioner, this petition is disposed of. Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3 shall renew the licences in favour of the petitioner if he is otherwise eligible.