IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 223 (M/B) of 2008 Ajay Kumar …………………..Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand through Senior Superintendent Of Police, District Haridwar & others ………..……..Respondents. Sri Parikshit Saini, Advocate, present for the Petitioner. Sri Tanuj Semwal, A.G.A., present for the State. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Learned counsel for the parties are present. (2) Sri Tanuj Semwal, learned Asst. Government Advocate makes a statement that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed against respondent no. 3 Pramod, respondent no. 4 Narendra and respondent no. 5 Kushalpal. A short counter affidavit has also been filed by the Investigating Officer to this effect. (3) In view of the above development, this writ petition for expeditious completion of investigation has become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Dharam Veer, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 11.06.2008 NS