IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27080 of 2010 MD.SAIDUR RAHMAN @ SAIDUL & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.07.2010 The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Azamnagar P.S. Case No. 14 of 2009 under Section 304-B, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Heard. Bail prayer of these petitioners was rejected by this Court vide order dated 8.3.2010 under Cr. Misc. No. 38073 of 2009 on the grounds as detailed in the order dated 8.3.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in this case the husband Md. Hasim @ Mastan was tried by the trial court under trial No. 332 of 2009/Tr. No. 266. Learned counsel tried to impress by making submission that the deceased’s father and mother did not support the prosecution case in that trial, hence, the husband was acquitted. The learned A.P.P. submitted that the husband was tried in a separate trial because the petitioners had not surrendered before the trial court. It was also submitted that the evidence in a separate trial is not admissible in the case of the petitioners. Further submission was that the petitioners had evaded the trial and they had not surrendered before the trial court despite rejection of their anticipatory bail prayer earlier by this Court. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not feel inclined to reconsider prayer for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected. (C. M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-