^^/-<°" RESPONDENTS IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUI$ WRIT PETITION NO.<2-S3 1/2005 PETITIONER :- KumariChandrakanti,agedabout 23 years, D/o Prem Lal, Caste Basod, R/o village Loing, Tahsil and Distrlct Raigarh [C.G]. VERSUS 1] Puran aged about GOyearSi S/o Dashrath, caste Ganda, 2] Baangati S/o Natho Satnaml. 3] Bodhram S/o Jhagru Satnaml, 4] JaiLal S/o MirchaSatnaml, 5] Jageshwar S/o Sujan Ganda 6] Bahadur S/oGunja Ganda. All are R/o village Loing, Tahsll and District Raigarh [C.G.]. 7] Sub •Divisidl'ial :'Offieer,ifT'ai-isll Raigarh, DistrictRaigarhECG] 8] Coljector, Raigarh, DistricfRaigarh [C.G], WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF JUE '^•••".^ y'" ^'a \y' ^y .. v"^^.'r pCtNSTITUtlON OF INiai^KRORSa^UANt^ <^^^^W^ : feltS.'ORBER.:.OR'.<»R0EiS.:lliBRBif[0N^^ y^DERTHEI^CTSANDGli^UMStftl^E^^Ft^ Petitioner Resfiondents H1GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT Bli-ASPUR WRiTPETITlON N0.2831 OF 2005 KumariChandrakanti Versus Puran & Others ashok WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTtON OF iNDIA (SB: Hon'bie Mr. Satish K. Agnshotri, J.) Present^- Noneforthepstitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur,Panel Lawyer for theState. ORDERfQRAU (Passed on 27thdayofJuly, 2010) | 1. The matfer is called for hearing twice. None appears nor is any representafion made on behalf of the petifioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. I. ^ ; '': • •. . ' • ' • • • 2. in view^ofthe above, the matte'r is dismissed forwant ofprosecution. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge vWVS^^^^iaassisavw3BcseaiW!3aC!ss^ SV3SSW SitSSIE SI^SySWSViVgSS^S:~'