IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 23878 of 2001 Between: 1 Navvada Kistamma, w/o. Late Narasimulu, r/o.H.No.10-2-155, Baller Lane, Laxminagar, Mallepally, Hyderabad. 2 Navvada Surender, Narasimulu, r/o.H.No.10-2-155, Baller Lane, Laxminagar, Mallepally, Hyderabad. 3 Navvada Narender, s/o. Late Narasimulu, r/o.H.No.10-2-155, Baller Lane, Laxminagar, Mallepally, Hyderabad. 4 Navvada Srinivas, s/o. Narasimulu, r/o.H.No.10-2-155, Baller Lane, Laxminagar, Mallepally, Hyderabad. 5 Navvada Srisailam, s/o. Narasimulu, r/o.H.No.10-2-155, Baller Lane, Laxminagar, Mallepally, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Joint Collector, Medak District at Sangareddy. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Medak. 3 N. Lakshminarayana, s/o. Narasimulu, H.No.10-3-361, Vijayanagar Colony, Hyderabad. 4 Smt. Susheela, w/o. Late Satyanarayana, H.No.10-3-361, Vijayanagar Colony, Hyderabad. 5 N. Srinivas, s/o. Satyanarayana, H.No.10-3-361, Vijayanagar Colony, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ of Mandajus or any other appropriate Writ or order or direction declaring the action of the Joint Collector, in refusing to set aside the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer, as illegal and unconstitutional and against the provisions of A.P. (.T.A.) Abolition of Inams Act, 1950 and consequently set aside the order of the Joint Collector No.F3/16/Inam/96 dated 20.8.2001 after declaring the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer, No.Dus B4/Inam/192/90 dated 13-8-1991 and pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.S.MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent : MR.P.VEERA REDDY FOR R20.04.06,VAK-4&5 GP FOR REVENUE FOR R The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.23878 OF 2001 ORDER : Sri P.Punna Rao, Advocate representing Sri K.S.Murthy, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the said submission the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 12.12.2008 *TSNR