IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR SEéiiEiE gEN€§$ Writpetitiomsmo. 583( V of2010 / Hemant Arora, Age — 44, S/o Late Om Prakash Arora, Central Store Sub Division, PWD Division # 2, Raipur PETITIONER Versus / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, thro’ Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) 2. Engineer - in - Chief, Public Works Department, Sirpur Bhavan, Raipur (CG) RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Wm! ...... 200 amtm (Wu) mam WWW mummy! 7. 10.20 0 10 Shri Raja Shanna counsel far thé petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, ’PL for t e State. Grievance of the petition r in the present petition is that though he is entitled for his seni rity from 5. 12.05 but the same has been given to him from 18..3,87 this fact has been admitted by the Engineer-in-chief of the RW and after considering the entire matter he has recommended his ase to the Principal Secretary of the Department for giving necessary rections. Shri Shanna submits that nds ofjustice would be served if at this stage, the petitioner is p tted to Withdraw this petition and direction be issued to the respon ent No.1 for considering the case of the petitioner expeditiously beca se he has already suffered a lot in the last 24 years. State counsel has no objec ion if any direction is issued to the respondent No.1 for consideri g the case of the petitioner in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition r is permitted to withdraw this petition. The respondent No.1 is rected to consider the case ‘of the petitioner in accordance with aw, as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of fou months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It would be the duty f the petitioner to apprise the respondents‘about the passing of his order. It is made clear that this urt has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the aut ority concerned would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in acco dance with law. / d . . i e i i