WPMS 1534/2005 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Sri T.A. Khan, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri N.S. Pundir, the learned Brief Holder for the State/respondent no. 1 and Sri Syed Nadim, the learned counsel for respondent no. 2. The petitioner filed a suit for permanent injunction against the Nagar Palika Parishad, Kotdwar. The said suit was dismissed by the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Kotdwar, against which, an appeal was filed before the District Judge, Pauri Garhwal. During the pendency of the appeal, the petitioner moved an application under Order 41 Rule 27 C.P.C. praying that he may be permitted to file an additional evidence, namely, house tax receipt issued by the Municipal Board, Kotdwar. The said application was rejected by the impugned order, against which, the present petition has been filed. Through the additional evidence, the petitioner was trying to portray that he was paying the property tax in respect of the house constructed by him, in which he was residing. The said application has been rejected on the ground that the Municipal receipt does not show that it was issued for the house in question. Even before this Court, nothing has been indicated that the receipt issued by the Municipal Board related to the house in question, namely, the property in dispute in the suit. In the absence of any prima facie evidence to that effect, the court below rightly rejected the application under Order 41 Rule 27 C.P.C. at the appellate stage. In view of the aforesaid, the Court does not find any error in the impugned order. The writ petition fails and is dismissed. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the court below within a week from today. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 21.12.2011 SP