IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13150 of 2010 GANESH PRASAD SINGH, son of Late Bishanudeo Pd. Singh, resident of Village Manjhaul, P.S. Cheria Briarpur, District Begusarai. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Commissioner Cum Secretary, Higher Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The L.N. Mithila University through its Vice-Chancellor, L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. 4. The Registrar, L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. 5. The Finance Officer, L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. 6. The Pension Officer, L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. 7. The Principal, R.C.S. College, Manjhaul, Begusarai. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 13.8.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-University as also the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation from the post of Office Assistant on 31st of July, 2008 while working in R.C.S. College, Manjhaul, Begusarai, his retiral dues as indicated in paragraph 1 of the writ application have remained to be settled, which have not been paid despite representation stating therein the details of the claims. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- University submits that the claims of the petitioner need to be verified from the record. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the 2 petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims the petitioner although had earlier represented, however, proposes to file a fresh representation before the Registrar of L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga (respondent no.4), with a copy each to the Finance Officer of the University (respondent no.5), the Pension Officer of the University (respondent no.6) and the Principal, R.C.S. College, Manjhaul, Begusarai (respondent no.7). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The details of calculation may also be supplied to the petitioner. However, upon consideration, if any of the claims or part of the claims is found not admissible, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)