IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2008 / 10TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 11580 of 2007(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ KOMALAVALLY NARAYANAN, W/O.MOHAN RAJ, CHITRA NIVAS, ENANTHY, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.P.JACOB SRI.N.T.SATHYAVAN SMT.V.H.JASMINE RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. KARULAYI KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGHAM LTD.NO.F 1780, KARULAI, MALAPPURAM , REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF KARULAYI KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARANA SANGHAM LTD.NO.F 1780, KARULAI, MALAPPURAM , REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIARY DEVELOPMENT, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN FOR R.1 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.RAVI KRISHNAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 11580 of 2007(C) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THIRD RESPONDENT DATED 22.7.06. EXT.P2: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.33535/06 DT.28.02.07. EXT.P3: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JOINING REPORT OF THE PETITIONER DATED 24.03;07. EXT.P4: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DT.19.3.07. EXT.P5: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE SUSPENSION ORDER ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DT.26.3.07. EXT.P6: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER'S BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DT.26.3.07. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS EXT.R1(a): TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER ISSUED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.A.NO.899 OF 2007 DT.03.04.07. /TRUE COPY/ rtr THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.11580 of 2007-C = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 1st day of September, 2008. JUDGMENT The petitioner, while employed in the service of the first respondent, filed this writ petition complaining that she has not been permitted to join duty after completion of leave and thereafter, she has been placed under suspension essentially as a matter of victimization in view of some of the litigations that she had initiated against the employer. Whatever be the reasons, as of now, the petitioner stands dismissed from service and that is pending in arbitration before the competent authority under the Kerala Co- operative Societies Act. Under such circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed leaving open all contentions and claims in relation to the question of suspension also. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/020908