HlQH,CQV@OFGHHATT!oGARHLB!!-ASPUI Writ Pefitfon (S's 70S2_of_2007 Petitioner Bholaram S/o. Ram Narayan aged about 48 vssrs workiHQ 8s Fitt8r Qrace —3.8outh Esstsm Coalfieid Umitsd, Bishrampur Area, Surguja •Fnl' /s3). Sespondenis Soutti Easfern Coalfielris Ltd throush Chairman- oum-Managing D'rector (Head Office) Seepat Road. Bilasour. y, 3) 4\ Deputy Chtef Psrsonnel Manager, Bishrampur Arss. South East©m Coslfisld Linsted. Bishrampur, Distt. Surguja (CG). Psreonnel Mansger, Bishrampur Area, Open Cost Mlnes, South Eastem Coaifietd Limited, ^lshrampur, Distt. Surguja (CG). Manager Mines, Bishrampur Area, Open Cost Mines, South Eastern Coaifi&td Limited, Bishrampur, DisSt. Surauja (CG). Writ PetlSton under Artiole 226 of t'ne Constitution of indiai Shri N.K. Vyas, counseifor the petlttoner. Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate appears on behaif of Shri P.S. Koshy, counsel for the respondents. With' consent of learned counsel appearing fcr both the parties, the matter is heard finalty. 2) Learned counse! aopeanng for the petitioner submlts that the petitioner has made representations dated 18-10-1998, 2-1-2002 and 12-1-2003 to the fesponsdents-authorities for correction of 'nis date of birth recorded in the sewce record, 'but t'ne respondents-authonties have rejected the aforesaid representations by order dated 12-1 0-2007 without referring t'ne matter m the Age Determination Committee. Learned counsei further submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on .merit, except that the matter may be referred to the Age Determination Committee, at the eariiest. Raju 3) Learned counsei appearing for the respondents SLibmits that the prayer may be granted as the respondents are wllling to refer the dispute to the Age DeteFmination Committee. 4) !n view of the above and acoording So Shri N.K. Vyas, iearned counsel appearing for the petitioner; nothing survives in the matter. Accordingly, this petitlon is disposed of Sd/- Satish K. Agnihoitri Judge HS WvK.: