IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN : PRESENT : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE: N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION No. 6521 of 2006 Between: K.L.G.Mani Kumar, S/o. Late Koteswara Rao. ..... Petitioner AND 1. The Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Caste Coop. Finance Corporation Limited, Hyderabad, rep. by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director. 2. The Executive Engineer (Social Welfare), Nizamabad. 3. The Deputy Executive Engineer (Social Welfare), Sub Division, Kamareddy, Nizamabad District. Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that Proc.No. A2/248/APSC/2006 dated. 09-03-2006 issued by the first respondent purporting to keep the petitioner’s appointment as in Charge Assistant Engineer issued vide Proc. No.A2/248/APSC/2006 dated. 24-02-2006 in abeyance is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. The Petition coming on for admission upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed herein and the orders of the High Court dated.28-04-2006, 30-11-2006 made in WPMP.Nos. 8336/2006 & 15366/2006 and dated 29-3-2007 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M.Panduranga Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Sri S.Mohan Rao, S.C. on behalf of the Respondents. The Court made the following ORDER: Respondent No.2 who appeared in person undertook to pay salary due to the petitioner by this week end. If respondent No.2 fails to keep up the undertaking and fails to pay the salary to the petitioner, then respondent No.2 and also respondent No.1 shall appear before the court and explain why they failed to comply the orders of this court and why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them. The counsel for respondent No.2 undertakes to inform the Superintendent Engineer not to implement the order dated 2-4-2007 till 16-4-2007 to which date the case stands posted. Post on 16-4-2007. Sd/-K.LAKSHMINARAYANA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Caste Coop. Finance Corporation Limited, Hyderabad.(BY SPL. MESSENGER) 2. The Executive Engineer (Social Welfare), Nizamabad.(BY SPEED POST) 3. The Deputy Executive Engineer (Social Welfare), Sub Division, Kamareddy, Nizamabad District. 4. One CC to Sri M.Panduranga Rao, Advocate(OPUC) 5. One spare copy. bsr HIGH COURT NVRJ DATED: 10-4-2007 NOTE: POST ON 16-04-2007 ORDER WP.NO. 6521 OF 2006 DIRECTION Bsr Dt. 11-4-2007 HIGH COURT NVRJ DATED: 10-4-2007 NOTE: POST ON 16-04-2007 ORDER WP.NO. 6521 OF 2006 DIRECTION