^K ssss^. M K^- «K;. a^2^^ INTHSai®<2( RiM'®^^ PETITIONERS V^T'PETaiXM^^.^^.^OO? 1 Santosh Dgyi 'WA) Shn Sampat Lal 3^di,ageda^ ofVillage Saja, Tallsil S^a, District .^0urg.(CG),.!...,;.:,.:;,;.:'.^.:'.'^ 2.Rishab Chai'idJam^S/QShri Achalchanid^ Jain,agedabout55 yeai-s, resldentofVillageSaja, T^isilSaja,DistrictDurg(CG). ' ..'VERSIJS. ;; ; .: RBSPONBENT8 :1 StateofGhhattisgarll ThroughSecretaryPublic ^ . WcJpsDgpartment^ *0 ^^ ^ Admimstt^ ^^'f^,:^^|^ti^'SaJ|uT'(€:.(^)^^ 1\. ^' 2 Sub Divisional OfBcer Public Work Departniertt Saja SubDivisional Saja /-ei5tt.0urg(G.G.) 3 ExecutiyeEngineer Publie'WorkDepa.rtrrient BemetaraJ3iyision Bemetara ' —•Bistt.Durg: 4 Sub Divisional Officer '^SajaDistt.Duig 5. Nagar Panchaxat, Saja, through its President, iNagar Panehayat Saja,: DistrictDuig(CG). WRITPmMefls188MS M®@ffi2^ :a» €<»Sr['I TEIi®lS^ ?M@IA. /' HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON (C) No. 4790 af2007 PETmONERS RESPONDENTS Santosh Devi & Anotha' VERSUS I, . State ofChhattis^uh & Ofliers And W.P. (0 Nos. 5143. 5343 & 5959 of2007 WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTIOLE 226 OF TIffi CONSTrTUTION OFIMDIA SB:H<»n'bteShriSatishK.Aenihotri.J. ; Present: Ms. Renu Kocfaara, Advocate fbr tfae petitioners. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer fbrthe State, , Shri Y.S. Thakur, Advocate forthe respondent Nagar Pan! Saja. , / ;• . •.;;-: ,;.- ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 5a> day of Aagast, 2010) Gowri W.P. (C) Nos. 4790, 5143, 5343 & 5959 of 2007, involve the same question oflaw and common fads and, as such, they are being disposed of by fhis common order. Challenge in these batch of petitions is that pursuaat to tte gaieral nrtice publidied in fhe news paper on 30//07/M07, <fae respondent Nagar Panchayat is proceedmg to demarcate the prq)erty and Aereafter, danoMsh the structure in diq)ute. Shri Thakur, leamed eounsel appearing for fhe respondent-Nagar Panchayat, fairly submits that pursuant to the notiee, no steps have been initiated to demoUsh any structure except demarcation for the purpose of widening ofroad. Leamed counsel further sufamits tiiat ifN^ar Panchayat takes decision to demolish the stmcture ®fthepetitioners, they would be aiforded an opportunity ofhearing by issuing a show cause notice and after hearing their respective cases. In view of foregoing, according to Ifae leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in these petitions for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of. Sd/- \ SatishK.Agnihotn Judge