THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P. No. 4652 of 2009 Oral order: This C.R.P. is directed against the order dated 07.08.2009, passed by the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy, dismissing the application in I.A. No. 642 of 2009 in O.S. No. 973 of 2007, filed by the petitioner praying to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to survey the suit plot with the assistance of Government Surveyor to find out whether it is situated in Sy. Nos. 47 and 48 of Pedda Amberpet village or not. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. Admittedly, the petitioner-plaintiff filed the suit for bare injunction. The evidence of the parties is closes and the matter is at the stage of arguments, and at that stage, the petitioner-plaintiff filed the present application, praying to appoint an Advocate Commissioner. In a suit for bare injunction, it is for the petitioner-plaintiff to prove that he was in possession of the suit schedule property as on the date of filing the suit. As stated above, the evidence of the parties is closed, and if at this stage, the request of the petitioner-plaintiff is accepted, then it would amount to permitting the Advocate Commissioner to collect evidence for the plaintiff, which is not permissible in law. In that view of the matter, I find no reason whatsoever to interfere with the order under revision in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The C.R.P. is devoid of merit, and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 21st January, 2010. KSR