IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27270 of 2010 1. GITA DEVI wife of late Gaya Prasad Pandey 2. Raju Pandey @ Sheo Kumar Pandey son of late Gaya Prasad Pandey-------- ------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 1.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioner no.1 is second wife of the deceased. First wife is dead. Petitioner no.2 is her son. Informant is son from deceased’s first wife. Land dispute is there in between the parties. Partition Suit is filed on behalf of the informant against his father and allegation is that petitioners were casting pressure on the deceased to transfer all the properties in their favour. There is mention of informatory petition also. So if property is said behind the killing that can be alleged against any of the parties either against informant or against petitioners but there is specific allegation that petitioners killed the deceased by pressing his neck that finds no corroboration in post mortem examination. Viscera is kept preserved. To ascertain if poisoning was there and according to the learned counsel until any report comes regarding poisoning , there can be no accusation against these petitioners as death was natural one due to effect of winter season. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of reciept/production of a copy of this order, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Kutumba P.S. case no.4 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J.)