IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Misc.Nos.7086-87 of 2011 & Civil Writ Petition No.13058 of 2009 Rajesh Mittal & others Vs. The State of Haryana & others Present: Mr.Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana, for respondent No.1. Mr.Amit Sharma, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 & 3. Mr.Gaurav Jindal, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioners have challenged the action of the respondents in charging the penal and compound interest. However, in response, it is disclosed that the plot of the petitioners has been resumed since 2008. The counsel for the petitioners contends that this order was never communicated to them. Since this order is now in the knowledge of the petitioners, they may take any appropriate proceedings to challenge the resumption order. Faced with this situation, counsel for the petitioners makes a prayer for permission to amend the writ petition. It would be appropriate for the petitioners to file a fresh petition to challenge the resumption order on any of the grounds that may be available to them where they can raise all the pleas available to them. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition to challenge the resumption order. Civil Misc.No.7087 of 2011 In view of the order passed in the main petition, no order need to be passed on the misc.application. May 18, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE