IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 690 OF 2007 Ramsingh Vijaybahadursingh Thakur...... ........ Appellant V/s State of Maharashtra ...... ...... ...... Respondent. Mr.K.Y.Mandlik i/by Ms.Lalita Panchakshari, Adv. For the appellant. Ms.S.P.Manchekar, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. CORAM: R.V. MORE, J. 11th DECEMBER, 2008. PC: Heard learned advocates for respective parties. Admit. Following substantial question arise for consideration: 1)Whether the appellant-plaintiff lost his right by virtue of introduction of Town Planning Scheme. 2)Whether the appellant-plaintiff became aware of suit property by adverse possession? 11.12.08 (R.V. MORE, J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1239 OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 690 OF 2007 Ramsingh Vijaybahadursingh Thakur...... ........ Appellant V/s State of Maharashtra ...... ...... ...... Respondent. Mr.K.Y.Mandlik i/by Ms.Lalita Panchakshari, Adv. For the appellant. Ms.S.P.Manchekar, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. CORAM: R.V. MORE, J. 11th DECEMBER, 2008. PC: Since Second Appeal No.690 of 2007 is admitted, pending hearing and final disposal of the said appeal interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a) of civil application is granted. Civil application stands disposed of. 11.12.2008 (R.V.MORE, J.)