THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21828 of 2009 Dated 01st July, 2010 Between: J. Devender Rao. …Petitioner And The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad, and others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri E. Madan Mohan Rao Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3: Assistant Government Pleader for Home Counsel for respondent No.4: Sri P. Raja Sripathi Rao The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “..to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus (a) declaring the action of respondents interfering with civil rights of petitioner by calling the petitioner to the offices/police station of Respondents 2 and 3 without taking any steps as per law, is illegal and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to 3 not to interfere with life and liberty of petitioner except in accordance with law. (b) direct the Respondent No.1 to 3 not to interfere with custody of the three children of petitioner including calling them to be present in the second/third respondent police station/authorities. (c) and to pass such further order..” At the hearing, Sri E. Madan Mohan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.28361 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 01st July, 2010 GHN