IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 12383 of 2008. Decided on: 29.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Promila. … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Narender Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that she had appeared for the interview/test for the post of Anganwari Supervisor, however, she has not been offered appointment to the post of Supervisor though the less meritorious persons have been considered and appointed to the said post. The petitioner has not arrayed any of those candidates against whom allegations have been made in the petition. Consequently, the present petition is bad for non-joinder of necessary 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - parties and the same is dismissed on this score alone. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 29, 2010. (sck).