1 UNREPORTED IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.183 OF 1998. 1. Shivaji Dadarao Surwase, Aged 53 years, Occ.Service, R/o Osmanabad. 2. Babusha Nivrutti Pawar, Aged 47 years, Occ.Service, R/o Omerga, Dist.Osmanabad, ... Petitioners. Versus 1. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad. 2. The Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad. 3. Vitthal Kishanrao Shaiwale, Aged 52 years, Occ.Service, R/o Omerga, Dist.Osmanabad. 4. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondents. ... Mr.N.B.Khandare, advocate for the petitioners. Mr.K.G.Patil, Asstt.Govt.Pleader for the State. Mr.M.P.Tripathi, advocate holding for Mr.N.J.Ghute Patil, advocatefor the Respondent No.1. ... 2 CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 29.06.2010. ORAL JUDGMENT (Per S.V.Gangapurwala,J.) 1. The petitioner challenges the order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad dated 28.10.1997, by virtue of which the Additional Commissioner granted promotion to Respondent No.3 and reverted the petitioner No.1. It is the case of the petitioner that they are entitled to the post of Assistant Accounts Officer and senior to the Respondent No.3 as they have passed the professional examination in the year 1989. The Additional Commissioner in his impugned judgment has observed that in the seniority list which was published, the Respondent No.3 was shown as senior and the Department has not held the examination since 1983 to 1989 and as the present Respondent No.3 has crossed 45 years of age it was not necessary to appear for said qualifying examination. 2. The Additional Commissioner has 3 considered the relevant aspects and in view of the fact that in the seniority list, the Respondent No.3 was shown as senior and the promotion would be in consonance with the seniority list, we do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order. The Writ Petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (B.R.GAVAI,J.) asp/office/wp183998