IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.123 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.123 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.123 OF 2006 ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.124 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.124 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.124 OF 2006 Mrs. Laxmi Narayan Satam ...Appellant/Applicant Mrs. Laxmi Narayan Satam ...Appellant/Applicant Mrs. Laxmi Narayan Satam ...Appellant/Applicant Vs. Vs. Vs. Narayan Rawaji Satam ...Respondent Narayan Rawaji Satam ...Respondent Narayan Rawaji Satam ...Respondent Mr.M.R.Suryavanshi, Advocate for Appellant Mr.M.R.Suryavanshi, Advocate for Appellant Mr.M.R.Suryavanshi, Advocate for Appellant Mr.B.D.Kadam, Advocate for Respondent Mr.B.D.Kadam, Advocate for Respondent Mr.B.D.Kadam, Advocate for Respondent CORAM: SHRI D.G. DESHPANDE & CORAM: SHRI D.G. DESHPANDE & CORAM: SHRI D.G. DESHPANDE & SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATE : 11TH DECEMBER, 2006. DATE : 11TH DECEMBER, 2006. DATE : 11TH DECEMBER, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the Advocate for the Appellant/Applicant and 1. Heard the Advocate for the Appellant/Applicant and 1. Heard the Advocate for the Appellant/Applicant and Respondent. Respondent. Respondent. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 46 days. The affidavit in reply is filed. Counsel for 46 days. The affidavit in reply is filed. Counsel for 46 days. The affidavit in reply is filed. Counsel for the Respondent states that he has filed reply dated 6th the Respondent states that he has filed reply dated 6th the Respondent states that he has filed reply dated 6th December, 2006 to this application and he has prayed that December, 2006 to this application and he has prayed that December, 2006 to this application and he has prayed that the respondent/husband has re-married on 17th August, 2006 the respondent/husband has re-married on 17th August, 2006 the respondent/husband has re-married on 17th August, 2006 and therefore, nothing survives in this application in the and therefore, nothing survives in this application in the and therefore, nothing survives in this application in the Appeal. We will consider that aspect later on, so far as Appeal. We will consider that aspect later on, so far as Appeal. We will consider that aspect later on, so far as the condonation of delay is concerned, the delay is the condonation of delay is concerned, the delay is the condonation of delay is concerned, the delay is satisfactorily explained, hence delay condoned. Civil satisfactorily explained, hence delay condoned. Civil satisfactorily explained, hence delay condoned. Civil Application stands disposed of. Application stands disposed of. Application stands disposed of. 3. Put up the Appeal for admission on Monday i.e. on 3. Put up the Appeal for admission on Monday i.e. on 3. Put up the Appeal for admission on Monday i.e. on 18th December, 2006. 18th December, 2006. 18th December, 2006. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (SHRI D.G. DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (SHRI D.G. DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (SHRI D.G. DESHPANDE, J.)