IN THE HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. ^g;^ 0/2011 Petitioner : KAMLESH KUMARI, AGED - 60, w/o R. S. GUPTA, R/o 9, South Avenue, Chaube Colony, Raipur RESPONDENTS: <»;'•• %'" ^.^'•" :^^ . ft ^^..-••" Versus l. Naya Raipur Development Authority, Thro its Chairman, Office at: Near Mantralaya, Mahanadi Gate, Raipur (CG) 2. Collector (Revenue') Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA <2^^^^..--' A B--'-'< 6V''' SIK^I^I iwsn^r sh^ich^fS'cf 'FSI ^ww^, ^xil^lto, (»«ni'Mi< \AJ'^.^^.S'^/"1<^< liWWI g,a|jq,---'"---"---f--'g^ ^^ SB : Hon'ble Shri ManJndraltohanShriTOStaya, J^, 31-01-2011 courlsel Shri Raja Sharma, Shri A. S. KaohhawahaJ Shri Arvind Dubey, Panj Heard, Leamed counsel for th^ owner of the land bearin^ P.C.No. 70/17, R.I.C. Mandir was a oonsent for acquisitior) thereof on the basjs of the Thereafter, the compensatjon non-irrigated land. Shri A. S. Kaohhawahd Shri Awind Dubey, learned submitted that there is a disj according to the respondents, petitioner, it is an irrigated going to determine and give possible, having regard to the| respondents further submitted earliest within a period of eightf Be that as it may, jf a authorities/Coltector, Raipur, shall be considered and decidi merits, before determining the larld ctii'ifd'ifl-l ^HvS 4i^S <("ltdl< ^7 3tPgT 311^'CT for the petitioner. counsel for respondent No. 1. • 1^1 Lawyer for the State/respondent No.2. petitioner submits that the petitioner is the Khasra No. 327, 323- Village-Kuhera, hjasaud, Tehsil Aarang, District Raipur. There of the land on payment of compensatton |fact that the said land was irrigated land. fs being determined treating the same to be j, learned oounsel for respondent No.1 and Panel Lawyer for respondent No.2/State ()ute with regard to nature of the land, as |t is a non-irrigated land and according to the ). However, the respondent authorities are |compensation to the petitioner as earty as 1 nature of the land. Learned counsel for the that it shall be oonsidered and decided at the tweeks. r^presentation is made by the petitioner to the cjuestjoning the nature of the land, the same jed, in accordance with law and on jts own jsompensation. [^^feir ~T°? ^irai?ra, 'gTftwis, ftdiy^ an^T^iT K;-li?b'Sllf^I. !t"1"»^m•• Tuman Hi*1CTI shlicb i^,P.(c^M\),g7L<j'^ti ^^ ,3(^I_TS'I%.^fel -2-- ^iT^fyTq^ 'WT??f ^ 'fe^ t^-^.K ^aifigqgn^T In view of for^oing, accoi|ding petjtioner;"rrott'>ing survjves for adji Accordingly, the writ petiticjn to learned counsel appearing for the udication at fhis stage. is disposed ofF. 3ttd6« [^-^fe.if