c^F' ^7 /^ BENI ..^. IN THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OTT rHTTATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S)NO. USSo /2010 PETITIONER Gulsb Singh Mandavi S/o Bharat singh ^ Maisdavi Aged about ^years , Upper Division Teacher, Govenunent Middle School Kholva, Block- Sahaspur Lohara, Distt.Kabirdham- (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS v^S'^ ^€q^ ^ ^ ^ br^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department ofEduc^ion, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director Public Iiistmctioii, Chh^tisgarh Govemment Raipur, Distt. Rfflpur (C.G.) 3. The District Education officer, Distt.Kabirdham- (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ...^•rL-—..--——-'—-—--—- @ 'T^r ^i^iKn^, ^Til'y^Ko, f®i<ni'H^< *11*1CTI »*11<1> ^^ S\5). ^5~3T>//'0 "^200 ^T[^T JT^K ( ^Glf^<i4) Sn^T'SRtl^W WT 3TT^?T sii*iw v-> v^. o Dyy^i ^wi^ ^ n 'STT^f cr)i<i(<n<fli ^TR^f ^T (s<<l <Pn^i< ^^tRw^n^r b" SB : Hon'bieShri Manindra fvlohan saii-ivastavaL-^ 16-08-2010 Shri Deepak Jain, counsei for tfie petiuoner. Shri Satish Gupta, Governmen| Heard. Learned counsei appeariny foj entitied to benefit of two advance ind B.T.i. examination before his appoint|Tient athis own cost. it is submitted that the issue invoived in the present peti| has been finaiiy decided by the Hoij Saxena vs. State of M.P. & Qrs.ZOQ^ (l!l)iWPJR (SC) 59. On the other hand, subrnissiol State is that this petition has been ?1Ie| Govemment. He subiTijts that if the sarne vviii be considered on its ovvrs rnt'rits and in accordance with Javv. Advocate for the State on ^dvaoce copy. the petitioner submits that the pelitioner js rernents on account of he havlng passed ion is no ionger res integra and the sarne ?ble Suprerrse Court in the case 'of ri of iearned counsei for the respoiidents- i without rnaking arry approach.-to the State petitiouer would rnake representation, the jn this view of the rnatteh i arn| staye. It would be open fuE~ the petiti^ making yippropriate representation, c] orders referred to above. in case sucil decide the sarne in accordance vvith i^ Vvith the aforesaiu8 observation not •indined to entertain this petition at this ^ne? to approach the State Government by airnirsy parity of treaiufsent on the basis of representation is made, responde?nts siiali rvv. • s, the petition stands disposed ofi Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^ira^k sN^rgsWOT, <i^?<pricr ----FS/147--2/2010 —1,00,000.