IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 16212 of 2008 Between: S.Vedavathi W/o.S.Krishna Reddy Near Pallavi Model Shcool Asmathpet Road New Bowenpally Secunderabad-500009 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 District Collector Ranga Reddy District 2 The Spl.Gr.Dy Collector Revenue Divisional Officer R.R District East Division 3 Mandal Revenue Officer Shamirpet (M) R.R District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ petition or direction declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not passing any orders on the representation submitted by the petitioner dt.30-7- 2007 as illegal arbitrary and consequetly declare the proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent vide B/1230/06 dt.6-9-2006 as illegal arbitrary and against the provisions of R.O.R act and consequently declare the property in Sy.No.32 to an extent of Ac 3-08 Gts situated at Turkapally(V) and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders on the petitioner' representation dt.30-7-2007 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MRS.SHANTHI NEELAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 16212 of 2008 Order: The main grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that she made a representation dated 30.07.2007 requesting the 2nd respondent, namely the Special Grade Deputy Collector and Revenue Divisional Oﬃcer, Ranga Reddy East Division, to mutate her name in the revenue records in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.3-08 guntas, situated in Survey No.32 of Turkapally village, Shamirpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, but till date no orders thereon had been passed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and both of them agreed to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the representation dated 30.07.2007 of the petitioner. Since the representation dated 30.07.2007 of the petitioner, seeking to mutate her name in the revenue records in respect of the land in question, is said to be pending consideration before the 2nd respondent and in view of the agreed stand taken by both the counsel, without going into the merits of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: The 2nd respondent, namely the Special Grade Deputy Collector and Revenue Divisional Oﬃcer, Ranga Reddy East Division, is directed to consider and dispose of the representation dated 30.07.2007 of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 28.07.2008 Nsr