IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33947 of 2011 Chhotu Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 12.10.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that four unknown persons robbed the truck driver’s torch and mobile. The name of petitioner sprang up on the statement of co-accused Surendra Yadav. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no recovery from possession of petitioner. Moreover, it is submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph no. 8 of the petition. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Kako P.S. Case No. 124 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner defaults for three consecutive occasions during trial. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)