THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.668 OF 2010 DATED:09.06.2010 Between: Telangana N.G.Os. Co-operative House Building Society Ltd., Regd.No.TBC-74 (Mailardevpally), rep., by its President Mr.M.P.Narayana .. Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Principal Secretary to Government Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.668 of 2010 ORDER: This Court allowed W.P.No.6288 of 2009 declaring the action of the Government and its officials in allotting the land to an extent of Acs.4.00 in Survey No.156/1/P, situated at Mailardevpally Village of Rajendranagar Mandal in Ranga Reddy District to the department of Housing for construction of houses to the weaker sections as illegal and improper, giving liberty to the Government to initiate appropriate action for recovery of possession in accordance with law. This Court pronounced judgment on 01.04.2010. The respondents allegedly continued development and construction in the disputed site. Therefore, enclosing necessary evidence, the writ petitioner filed this Contempt Case. While ordering to issue Form-I for appearance of Contempnors/respondent Nos.4, 5 and 6, this Court passed interim orders restraining the Project Executing Agency and its officials especially respondent Nos.5 and 6 herein from proceeding with any further construction pending Contempt Case. The matter is called on 07.06.2010 for appearance of the Contemnor Nos.4, 5 and 6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Government has preferred an appeal being W.A.No.326 of 2010 and Contempt Appeal against the interim order dated 27.04.2010 in Contempt Application No.386 of 2010. Be that as it is, Contemnor Nos.5 and 6 have filed two separate sworn affidavits inter alia stating that after receiving the copy of the order of this Court through the petitioner’s counsel, they advised the contractor to stop the work and no further work was undertaken. They also tendered unconditional apology. In the background of the Contempt Case, as elucidated hereinabove, there are no strong reasons to discard the apology. The same is accordingly accepted and the Contempt Case is closed leaving the parties to pursue their rights in the Writ Appeal before the Division Bench. Rule is discharged. ______________ (V.V.S. RAO, J) 09.06.2010 KH