THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU W.P.No.3160 of 2010 Date of Order: 21-07-2010 Between: 1. All India Yadav Mahasabha A.P. State Committee, Khailash Bhavan, Hyderabad ..Petitioner and 1.The Govt. of A.P., rep by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others ..Respondents The Court made the following Order: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU W.P.No.17522 of 2010 Oral Order : (Per Honourable Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy) The petitioner—Society filed this writ petition in the form of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking a direction to the respondents not to utilise the land measuring Ac.0.33 gts in Sy.No.347 of Kukatpally Village, Balanagar Mandal, Rangareddy District, which is set apart for the purpose of grave yard, for any other purposes other than the graveyard. It is not disputed the Deputy Collector, Tahsildar, Balanagar Mandal vide Lr.No.B/17947/2008, dated -11-2008 addressed to the Deputy Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC), Kukatpally Circle stated that Collector had issued oral instructions to handover possession of the land in an extent of Ac.0.33 gts. in Sy.No.347 of Kukatpally village, which was earlier handed over to MEO, Balanagar for playground of DPEP School, to the GHMC, Kukatpally Circle for establishing graveyard for local persons use and called upon the Deputy Commissioner GHMC, Kukatpally Circle to take over possession of the same. Once it is earmarked and allotted for establishing the graveyard to the local persons, if the said land is sought to be utilised for any other purpose, the petitioner—society is under obligation to make a representation to the Collector and all other officials concerned not to change the nature of use before invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution in the form of PIL. Only on rejecting such representation, petitioner can espouse the cause. In view of the same, present writ petition cannot be entertained on mere apprehension and it is accordingly dismissed. However, petitioner is at liberty to make a representation to the official respondents 1 and 2 not to change the nature of use. On making such representation, the respondents are under obligation to consider the same and intimate the action taken on the said representation to the petitioner within four weeks from the date of making such representation. No costs. ________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J. ___________ K.C.BHANU,J. 21-07-2010 Murthy