-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.1026 of 2008 Bank Karmachari Sangh ..Petitioner vs. 1. Vidya Sahakari Bank Ltd. and others ..Respondents Shri P.M.Huddar for petitioner. Shri A.R.Patwardhan for respondent no.1 Shri M.S.Topkar with Shri P.S.Moholkar for respondent no.2. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. 14th February, 2008 14th February, 2008 14th February, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, after his attention is invited to the grounds in the petition so also page 4(sub para (d) makes a statement that the statement in the petition which purports to cast asperation on the learned Member of the Industrial Court be allowed to be deleted. In my view, unless there are strong circumstances and there is material to back such allegations, they need not appear in the proceedings under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Further, the joinder of a Judge concerned is also not necessary in all cases. In the peculiar facts of this case and since the learned Counsel prays for deletion of the allegations, prayer is granted. Sub para -2- (d) of the petition averments shall stand struck off so also the prayer in that behalf. 2. At the request of Shri Topkar learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.2, stand over for one week to enable him to take instructions and make appropriate statement with regard to institution of proceedings by respondent no.2. 3. S.O. for one week. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)