IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6426 of 2009 BILASH MAHTON @ RAM BILASH MAHTON, SON OF BISHUNDEB MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AJANIGHAT, POLICE STATION-BARAHIYA (BIRPUR), DISTRICT- LAKHISARAI………………………………………..PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…………………….OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. N.A. Samshi, Advocate. For the State : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. --------- 8. 17.12.2009. Perused the report, flagged at ‘B’. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is a political worker and an elected Ward Member of the Gram Panchayat. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to enmity. Learned A.P.P. for the State submitted that there is direct allegation against the petitioner of firing upon the deceased which had hit the temporal region of the deceased and 2 due to that injury, he had succumbed. Having regard to the gravity of the nature of the offence and fact that there is direct allegation against the petitioner of firing at the deceased causing his death, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. As a result, this application is dismissed. However, in view of the report, the trial court is directed to take every steps for expeditious disposal of the trial. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)