IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CEA No.79 of 2006 Date of decision:10.10.2006 Commissioenr Central Excise Commissioenrate, jalandhar (Hqrs at Chd.) ....Appellant versus M/s. D.S.Dyers,Inside Lahori Gate, Amritsar. ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Vineet Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. JUDGMENT: 1. This appeal has been preferred by the revenue against reduction of penalty amount by the Tribunal to Rs.10,000/-, which was the amount of penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority but had been enhanced by the Commissioner (Appeals). 2. Though, notice had been issued having regard to judgment of this Court in favour of the revenue in The Commissioner, Central Excise Commissionerate, Ludhiana v. Punjab Alkalies Chemicals Limited, CEA No.39 of 2005, decided on 13.7.2006, having regard to the fact that the dispute involved is only of Rs.13,000/-, we are of the view that no interference is called for by this Court and, accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. (Adarsh Kumar Goel) Judge Oct.10, 2006 (Rajesh Bindal) 'gs' Judge