HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29814 of 2011 Date: 23.11.2011 Between: Yeduguru Chandrasekhar Reddy ..... Petitioner AND APSRTC Reptd by its Vice-Chairman/Managing Director, Hyderabad and two others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri G.Manoj Maharaj Counsel for the Respondents: Smt W.V.S.Rajeswari Standing Counsel for APSRTC The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is ﬁled for a Mandamus to direct the respondents to declare the petitioner as the highest bidder in pursuance of tender notiﬁcation No.Cs/437(30)2010 and complete the process of entering into agreement with the petitioner. The respondents have issued tender notiﬁcation for running stalls, shops and canteens in various bus- stations in Kurnool District; that two stalls have been notiﬁed for Dhone bus-station. It is the case of the petitioner that he has oﬀered Rs.27,300/- per month for running a canteen in the said bus-station and according to him, the said oﬀer is the highest amount. The petitioner alleged that due to certain extraneous reasons, the respondents have not been ﬁnalising the tender in his favour. Sri W.V.V.Rajeswari, learned Standing Counsel for APSRTC, representing the respondents, submitted that the petitioner’s tender was considered and rejected as he failed to submit details of his annual turn over, income, etc., which are to be fulﬁlled as per the tender notiﬁcation and that the oﬀer made by a person by name P.Guruswamy for Rs.25,000/- was accepted and an agreement was concluded on 14.10.2011, with eﬀect from 15.10.2011 for the initial period of seven years, which is extendable for another three years. As the premise, viz., that the petitioner’s tender is not ﬁnalised, on which the Writ Petition is ﬁled, has turned out to be incorrect with the conclusion of the agreement in favour of one Guruswamy, no relief as claimed in this Writ Petition can be granted. However, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the ﬁnalisation of tender in favour of the said Guruswamy, he shall be free to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law. Subject to the liberty given to the petitioner as above, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.36933 of 2011 ﬁled by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 23rd November 2011 DR