... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.194 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.194 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.194 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.377 OF 2006 REVISION APPLICATION NO.377 OF 2006 REVISION APPLICATION NO.377 OF 2006 Suresh Mohanlal Mehta ...Applicant Vs. B.C.Rajak & Anr. ...Respondents Shri Girish Kulkarni for the Applicant. Shri D.T.Palekar for the Respondent No.1. Shri A.S.Shitole, A.P.P for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 18, 2006. : OCTOBER 18, 2006. : OCTOBER 18, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate appearing for the Applicant and Shri Palekar appearing for the first Respondent. Fine amount has been deposited. The Applicant was on bail throughout the trial and during the pendency of the Appeal. He was in jail from 22nd February, 1991 to 22nd October, 1991 and again from 16th September, 2006. The substantive sentence is of three years. Revision is already admitted for final hearing. Hence, Applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail till the final disposal of Revision Application. 2. Hence, I pass the following order: (i) The Applicant shall be enlarged on the same ... 2 ... bail on which he was enlarged during the pendency of trial subject to filing fresh bail bonds. (ii) Bail is granted subject to condition that the Applicant will mark attendance with the Assistant Collector of Customs, REI (P) once in every calendar month till the disposal of the Revision Application. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE