IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 14TH MARCH 2011 / 23RD PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 11683 of 2010(I) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ REJI POTTI,TC 39/1514,KALAYAN NAGAR, KILLITHARA LANE, MANAKKAD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI.S.M.PREM SMT.K.P.SANTHI SRI.P.K.NIJOY SMT.NISHA G.THARAMAL RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,FORT POLICE STATION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. MANOJ @ KANNAN,KALYAN NAGAR, KILLITHARA LANE, MANAKKAD.P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. AYYAPPAN @ KINNAN,KALYAN NAGAR, KILLITHARA LANE, MANAKKAD.P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. AANANDI, KALYAN NAGAR, KILLITHARA LANE, MANAKKAD.P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 7. KUMAR, KALYAN NAGAR KILLITHARA LANE, MANAKKAD.P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 8. KANNAN @ PARTY,VALIYA SALA, THYCAUD.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. WP(C)NO.11683/2010 9. NISHANT, KALYAN NAGAR, KILLITHARA LANE, MANAKKAD.P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 10. MURUGAN, KALYAN NAGAR, KILLITHARA LANE, MANAKKAD.P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 11. JAGAN,KALYAN NAGAR, KILLITHARA LANE, MANAKKAD.P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS R4 TO R10 BY ADV. SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY SMT.K.R.RIJA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.11683/2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 25/3/2010. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- WPC No.11683 of 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th March, 2011 JUDGMENT Basant, J. This petition was filed as early as on 5.4.2010. Notice was ordered to the respondents on 5.4.2010. Respondents have been served. They have not filed any objections. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is absolutely no merit in the prayer made for police protection. There is no threat to the life of the petitioner, as alleged. 2. We note that the petition was filed as early as on 5.4.2010. Passage of time without any orders is eloquent proof of the fact that there is no real and reasonable threat against the life of the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to substantiate the allegations of threat against the life of the petitioner. This petition is, in these circumstances, dismissed. R.BASANT JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE css/