IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.276 of 2007 HARI NARAYAN CHATERJEE Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4. 3.9.2008. N.H./ This application has been filed against the order dated 27.11.2006 whereby the petitioner has been directed to pay interim maintenance to the opposite party no.2. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. It is submitted that it is a case of 1990, but the opposite party waited for 16 years for filing petition for ad interim maintenance and that too when the case is at the verge of final disposal. It is further submitted that both parties have already led their evidence and only judgment has to be passed by the court below. Considered the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order. Without prejudice to the merit of the case, this application is allowed. The impugned order is hereby set aside with a direction to the court below to positively dispose of the case within two months of receipt of this order with intimation to this Court. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )