W.P.(C.) No.16456/2006 Page 1 of 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C.) No.16456/2006 % Date of Decision: 06.07.2009 Lalit Kumar …. Petitioner Through Mr.R.K.Saini, Advocate Versus Delhi Development Authority …. Respondent Through Ms.Anusuya Salwan, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR 1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? YES 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NO ANIL KUMAR, J. * The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has been allotted flat No.113, Pocket 14, Sector 20, Rohini, Delhi under the new pattern registration scheme. The learned counsel contends that though the allotment letter has been issued, however, the rate charged is the current cost which according to the petitioner, he is not liable to pay. The learned for the petitioner states that the time to deposit the demand raised by the DDA is by 20th November, 2009. Since the demand raised by DDA now is not the subject matter of this petition, the learned counsel on instructions seeks that the petition be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the amount demanded by the petitioner by letter dated 24th May, 2009 in respect of flat No.113, W.P.(C.) No.16456/2006 Page 2 of 2 Pocket 14, Sector 20, Rohini in the name of the petitioner by filing a separate petition. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with the liberty as prayed for. All the pending applications are also disposed of. July 06, 2009 ANIL KUMAR, J. ‘k’