IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-13439 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:27.07.2011 Shallu . . .Petitioner Versus State of Punjab . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Hitesh Pandit, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.A.S. Rai, DAG, Punjab. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This is a petition for pre-arrest bail in a case registered vide FIR No.93 dated 23.12.2010 under Sections 323, 324, 341, 148 & 149 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) at Police Station Noormahal, Jalandhar. At the time of notice of motion, learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted that the offence under Section 326 IPC was added later on which is relating to injury No.2 on the head of the complainant and is not attributed to the petitioner, hence he was granted interim bail. On the last date of hearing, learned State counsel had opposed the bail on the ground that the complainant remained in hospital for about two months because of the said injuries. The injury attributed to the petitioner is on the lower abdomen and Doctor had even opined for surgery. Learned counsel for the State has pointed out today that the petitioner has remained in hospital from 12.12.2010 to 1.1.2011 because of the total six injuries suffered including the stab injury attributed to the petitioner. In this view of the matter, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, the petition is hereby dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JULY 27, 2011 JUDGE Vivek