IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 23168 of 2005 Between: Kasam Venkata Sesha Reddy, Chairman Trust Board of Sri Rajamalleswara Swami Temple, S/o.Yellamanda Reddy, Gangavapalli Village, Donakonda Mandal Prakasam district. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner, Endowments, Tilak Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Asst.Commissioner, Endowments, Prakasam district, Ongole. 3 Palle Subba Reddy, S/o.Chinakonda Reddy, R/o.Gangadevapalli Village, Donakonda Mandal, Prakasam district. 4 Nandireddy Kotiressy, S/o.China Kotireddy, R/o.Gangadevapalli Village, Donakonda Mandal, Prakasam district. 5 Kanati Koteswara Reddy, S/o.Seshi Reddy, R/o.Gangadevapalli Village, Donakonda Mandal, Prakasam district. 6 Yeggoni Guramma, W/o.Devaiah, R/o.Gangadevapalli Village, Donakonda Mandal, Prakasam district. 7 Borigarla Thiparaiah, S/o.Chinarajulu, R/o.Gangadevapalli Village, Donakonda Mandal, Prakasam district. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: None appeared Counsel for the Respondent No.1 and 2 : GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent No.3 to 7 : None appeared The Court made the following : O R D E R: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition itself is taken up for hearing and disposal. This writ petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus to set aside proceedings dated 03-10-2005 issued by respondent No.2, appointing respondents 3 to 7 as members of Trust Board for Sri Rajamalleswara Swami Temple, Gangadevapalli Village, Donakonda Mandal, Prakasam District. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. A perusal of the record shows that no stay of impugned proceedings has been granted. Further, the period for which the Trust Board has been constituted being two years, as evident from the impugned proceedings, the same expired in October, 2007. Therefore, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP No.29718 of 2005 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Dated 1st July, 2008 vrn