THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.No. 5240 of 2009 ORAL ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the orders of the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad in R.A.No. 16 of 2008, dated 8.9.2009 confirming the judgment passed by the Addl. Rent Controller, Secunderabad in R.C.No. 25 of 2005, dated 16.11.2007. Brief facts of the Revision are that: Before the learned trial Court, the Land Lord, who is the respondent herein has filed R.C.No. 25 of 2005 against the Tenant, who is the petitioner in the Revision for eviction of the suit schedule premises. After hearing both the sides and after the evidence is over, the learned Rent Controller has partly allowed the Petition directing the tenant to vacate and hand over the possession of the suit schedule premises to the Land Lord. Challenging the said order, the defeated tenant has filed R.A.No. 16 of 2008 before the learned lower appellate Court and the Land Lord has preferred R.A.No. 9 of 2008 before the lower appellate Court and the lower Appellate Court after hearing both the sides has dimissed both the Appeals. Challenging the said order in R.A.No. 16 of 2008, the defeated tenant has preferred the present Civil Revision Petition. Heard both sides. Today when the matter is called, the Tenant has filed an Affidavit seeking one year time to vacate the suit schedule premises. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking into consideration the request of the tenant to vacate the suit schedule premises, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, the tenant shall vacate the suit schedule premises on or before 30th June, 2010 and hand over the vacant possession of the suit schedule premises to the Land Lord. _______________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J 12.11.2009 CHV