IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2317 of 2011 SUDHA KUMARI, W/O SHRI SHAILENDRA KUMAR, R/O MOHALLA-TEJA TOLA, KATIHAR, P.S.-KATIHAR, DISTRICT-KATIHAR. ………PETITIONER. Versus 1. DR. ARUN KUMAR, THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, B.N.MANDAL UNIVERSITY, LALOO NAGAR, MADHEPURA. 2. SHRI KUMAROSH PRASAD SINGH, THE REGISTRAR, B.N.MANDAL UNIVERSITY, LALOO NAGAR, MADHEPURA. 3. SHRI JITENDRA ROY, THE EXAMINATION CONTROLLER, B.N.MANDAL UNIVERSITY, LALOO NAGAR, MADHEPURA. 4. SMT. PRATIMA PATEL, THE PRINCIPAL, MILLIA FAKHRUDDIN ALI AHMAD, B.ED. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, RAMBAGH, PURNEA. 5. THE STATE OF BIHAR. …………OPP. PARTIES. ---------------------------------- 3 08.12.2011 It appears from the show cause that, pursuant to the orders of this Court passed in the writ matter, the representation of the petitioner has been considered by the University and the same has been rejected which has been communicated to the petitioner by letter no.621 dated 06.05.2011 annexed as Annexure-A with the show cause. The order is a reasoned one and hence the order of this Court passed in the writ matter stands complied with. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order of the University, as communicated by Annexure-A, he has a liberty to challenge the same in an appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. The contempt application is disposed of. Arvind/ ( J.N. Singh, J.)