Crl. Revision No. 109 of 2011(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 109 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 18.01.2011 M/s Shiv Tractors Dealer and another ...... Petitioners Versus M/s Sohibit Polyclinic Private Limited ...... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. Jainainder Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Bikram Chaudhary, Advocate for the respondent-complainant. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This is a revision against conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act wherein sentence of 6 months and compensation of Rs.60,000/- had been awarded by learned Sessions Judge, Hisar. Petitioner No.2,(proprietor of petitioner No.1-firm) admittedly has now been in custody since 07.12.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has repaid the amount and has entered into a compromise with the complainant. The complainant who is being represented by Mr.Bikram Chaudhary, Advocate (and identified by learned Crl. Revision No. 109 of 2011(O&M) 2 counsel for the petitioner)is also present in Court who has accepted the factum of compromise. In the circumstances I deem it appropriate, even while maintaining the conviction, to reduce the sentence of the petitioner to that already undergone by him. Let the petitioner be now released forthwith, if not required in any other case. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. Since the main case has been decided, the CRMs, if any, also stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE January 18, 2011 sunita