IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 829 of 2006 Date of decision: 03.11.2009 State of H.P. and others …Petitioners Versus Chander Mohan …Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K.Ahuja, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioners: Mr. R.K.Bawa, Advocate General with Shri Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General. For the respondent: Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. Per Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) The State has filed this writ petition against the order of the learned Tribunal dated 23rd May, 2006 whereby a direction has been given to grant work charge status to the applicant from the date he has completed 10 years of service with 240 days in each calendar year within a period of six months from the date of the order by the Tribunal. Admittedly, the applicant had completed 240 days of service prior to 31.12.1993. Therefore, in terms of the judgement rendered by this Court in Gauri Dutt and ors. Vs. State of H.P. 366 LHLJ 2008(1) the petitioner is entitled to the relief granted to him by the learned Tribunal. The petitioner must be regularized/granted work charge status in terms of the judgement 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? 2 passed by this court in Gauri Dutt and others case (supra). There is no merit in the writ petition which is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ( Deepak Gupta ), J. 3rd November, 2009 ( V.K.Ahuja), J. ™