IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 5114 of 2009 Date of Decision : August 03, 2009 Smt. Shakuntla and others. … Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE J.S. KHEHAR, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present : Mr. Arun Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Palika Monga, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Arun Walia, Advocate, for respondent No.3. J.S. Khehar, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondents state, that the controversy on the instant issue has been decided against the claim raised by the petitioners by this Court, and the challenge raised at the hands of the land owners before the Supreme Court has been declined. In this behalf, our attention has been invited to the order of the dismissal of the petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) bearing No. 11235 and 11236 of 2009 (Rakesh Kumar Jain and another vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 12.05.2009). CWP No. 5114 of 2009 Learned counsel for the petitioners did not assail the aforesaid assertion at the hands of the learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed in terms of the order passed by this Court, as also by the Supreme Court in Rakesh Kumar Jain’s case (supra). ( J.S. Khehar ) Judge August 03, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2