IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 5817 of 2008. Decided on: 02.08.2010. __________________________________________________________ Tikka Ram. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Sunny Datwalia, Advocate vice Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondents. : Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. Sunny Datwalia, Advocate appearing vice Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petitioner is rendered infructuous with the passage of time. Consequently, the same is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. August 02, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?