f i \^ IN THE HON'BLE'HIGH GOURT OF GHHftTTISGARH AT BILA^UR MISG. APPEAL N0« —^^\_/200S (1^15100 Bthdt T> APPa,LANTS ®6N-APPLIC&NTS s- 1) ^' ^ '^' ^w ^M^ 2) / ryi^ /sy' /^ /^ y7/ ^// RSSPONDENTS .•AIMANTS rt&^tll^ 'H "•?.'V;s fe 'iTcr^ V&^ M/s. iTain Transpert Company Through- Proprieter Ashok iTain, New Bus Stand Baloda Bazar Tah. Baloda Bazar, BjLStrict Raipur (C.G.). ©aneshSatnami aged about 35 years S/o. Negi Satnami, Truek Driver, Truek No. 03-4 ZC/ 1630, R/o. Villgge Sandi, Post Baloda Bazar, Bistfc. Raipur through t-ft/s. iTainTransporfe Gompany, Prpprietor Ashok <Tai.n New Bus Stand, Baleda Ba'sar, Taia» Baloda Bazar, ©istrii.et- Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS i- ^—1) Smt. Sunita Bai aged about 30 *'' s jyears, wife of late Ram:Sar&yan 'Verma » . ^_^.) <^~ Mukesh Kumar Venna Awabeliya, aged 10 years, S/o lateiRam - Narayan Venna. \ - ^_3)^ Kamlesb Kuinar Verma Awdheliya aged GS.years S/o labe Ram - Narayan venna. Awdhesh Kumar Verma Awdiieliya ageiS 07 years S/o late Ram- Narayan Verma• i. .; 11 Respondent No« 2 to 4 ava ininor through their nafeural mQtfher : Smt. Sun.i.ta Bai widow efi' Ram- Sarayan verma. All R/o Main Rbad Sakri,NTab. Takhafcpur, Distfe. Bilasp|t|E .(.©3}, la B iy!• -• •-- — ( 2 ) MISC. APPEAL UNDER SECTION '173 O? THE MOTOR VEHIGLE ACS w ^sc^ 1 t'liflS^1 & :%^^~ '^•-slt^Sa-'' 3-0 !SC. APPEAL N0. 564 OF 2005 M/s Jain another. Transport Compahy and RESPONDENTS Smt. Sunita Bai and others, ApDea! under Sectlon 173.0fthe Motor Vehicies Act ion Bench: Hon'ble Shri N.K. Aaarwa! & Hon'bia Shri R.L. Jhanwar, JJ. •esent: Shri Malay Kumar Bhaduri, counsel for the appeilants. None for the respondents. : Passed on 29'" day of November, 2010; Learned counsel for the appellants pieads no instructlon. !n view of above, we have no other option excspt to dismiss this appea! for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the appeai is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- N.K.Agrawal Judge Sd/- R.L. Jhanwar Judge '\——s