IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19408 of 2010 SOBRATI MIAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 27.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In this eight years old case charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner also. It is contended that in fact the culprit is Sobrati Ansari, son of Mokhtar Ansari of village-Patauwan, P.S.-Darauli, District- Siwan, but finding similarity in the name of the petitioner being Sobrati Mian, son of Multan Mian. Petitioner has been remanded and is in custody since 8.02.2008. It is also contended that petitioner has no alias name and the accused named in the F.I.R. is altogether different person though resident of same village but of different Tola. My attention was drawn towards a petition in the shape of compromise filed by the informant giving clean chit to the present petitioner and also showing the error committed by the police. Taking into consideration all such aspects, on the event of the informant appearing before the court below in 2 person on due identification stating that he has filed the petition aforementioned with his free will and consent without any coercion and the petitioner is not the real required person and also the informant appearing as one of the bailors of the petitioner, he is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Siwan in connection with Session Trial No.131/2010 arising out of Darauli P.S.Case No.131/2010 with additional condition to attend the court on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, on failure on two consecutive dates, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. V.K. Pandey (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)