IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR M.A. No. / OS72009 / IN THE MATTER OF: APPELLANT/ PLAINTIFF lil Agrawal, .„ n _)[ " S/o Shri R.L. Agarwal c^^S^ ^dR^b^tR4noJears/ ^;^'^'" °^<^"' RESPONDENT/ DEFENDANT ./ R/o Bastar Road, Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh VERSUS Smt. Parmeshwari Bai, W/o Shri Hari Ram Mahawar, Aged about 62 years, R/o Sunderganj Ward, Infront of Bathena Hospital, Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL UNDER ORDER XLIII, RULE 1 (r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. IXI-HC—78 'S'ST T<it^i<yi^,®til<H<t(o,T®ldl^!j,< \ r. ••••.. . PO^ 1©,^~ ^l*<dl tb^lcb ^- ' • *-^"^^^ ^ 200^ ^^ T^ ( yit^^T) 371^T ^)T f^^icb TTSH W^T 9n^icn ^lf^^-. j4v- Sahu ^^TW TrftcT a;TT^T >.B. Hon'blti Slltl Juslicy N.K. At 15.04.2010 Shri Ankit Singhal, Advocat< None fqr respondent. Learned couhsel ..^m^: thjs appeial.Bi^Mbmdisposed of di ^ ^ttivAl^lf^ulated time pi Prayer is reasonable and is Accordingly, the appeal is di directed to decide the suit in ac< merits as early as possible prefei from the date of receipt of a cop costs. llarwdl ^Fft;T TTW^ff ^f fe^t <p3i^i< ^^tRm^TT^T |forappellant. |for the appellant submits that lecting the trial court to decide Iriod. llowed. ^posed of and the trial court is tordance with law on its own ably within a period one year of this order. No order asto Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge T