IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY THE TWENTYFOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENAKUMARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No. 6 3 9 OF 2004 Between: M.A. Sattar, S/o M.A. Khader, aged about 60 years, R/o 10-3-32/9/31, East Marredpally, Secunderabad. … Appellant V/s. Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District & Ors. … Respondents Counsel for the appellant : Sri Vedula Venkataramana Senior Advocate Counsel for the Respondents : GOVT.PLEADER FOR REVENUE Sri L.Ravichander THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENAKUMARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No. 6 3 9 OF 2004 JUDGMENT : (Per the Hon’ble Smt.Justice T.Meenakumari) The writ appeal is filed against order dated 27-2-2004 passed in WP.No9. 2550 of 2004 passed by the learned single Judge, whereby the learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition holding that no infirmity is discernible in the order passed by the Mandal Revenue Officer as confirmed by the Revenue Divisional Officer and Joint Collector warranting interference by the Court in exercise of equitable and discretionary jurisdiction. 2. The main writ petition has been filed seeking writ of certiorari calling for the order in Case No. D5/2451/2002, dated 06- 1-2004 of the first respondent confirming the order of the second respondent in Case No. C/2416/2001, dated 18-3-2002 and to quash the same and also consequential direction to the third respondent to pass appropriate orders on the claim of the petitioner for regularization of sale transaction contained in the agreement of sale deed dated 19-10-1984 relating to the land admeasuring Acs:3-14 guntas in Sy.Nos. 91 and 92 of Yapral village, Malkajgiri Revenue Mandal, Ranga Reddy district. 3. When the matter came up for final hearing, Sri Vedula Venkataramana, learned Senior Counsel submitted that liberty may be granted to the appellant to withdraw the writ appeal, as the matter has been settled out of court. 4. Recording the same, the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ________________________ JUSTICE T. MEENAKUMARI _____________________ JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR 24 – X I - 2009 I s L THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENAKUMARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No. 6 3 9 OF 2004 Judgment of the Division Bench delivered by the Hon’ble Smt.Justice T.Meenakumari Circulation Entry Serial No. 5 2 Computer No.43 Date:24-XI-2009 I s L