IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3746 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 22, 2011 Vishnu Goyal and another …Petitioners Versus Sadhu Singh and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. Anantbir Singh Sidhu, Advocate for Mr. ADS Jattana, Advocate for the petitioners. ARVIND KUMAR, J(ORAL) Civil Misc. No.17237-CII of 2011 Application is allowed as prayed for. Copy of Zimni order dated 06.06.2011 (Annexure P-5) is taken on record. Civil Revision No.3746 of 2011 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states that in pursuance to order passed by this Court on 02.06.2011, the opposite party has accepted the costs and has given no objection on granting of two opportunities to the plaintiff-petitioners to conclude the evidence. In this backdrop of the fact or as has been reflected in the order dated 06.06.2011 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dera Bassi, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the present revision petition be dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. It is ordered accordingly. 22.07.2011 (ARVIND KUMAR) vcgarg JUDGE