^(Di- yiefcfciGQURTJOI:GMIA I G<ffiffite;Baj PUR t:i"^ SingleBench: Hon'MeShnDiUpRaoMfedihOe»hmd(h<J. Applicant Respondent M.C.G.No.M2^2fla8 Girdhari Lstf. Sto - AnaHd, Raai. .farihwari. t®ed^»A2S yeais, Proprietor, Anand fitteipifees, fttehahnaGandhK^ffg^ffeiipuR Versus .Shyam SBRder BhaUa, Sto Sh. -Hotehand Bhafia, i^wt abwit-40 yeais, Mahataaa Gandhi Maqi. Raipur. ftDDUcationfoTrestoFationofSecondAmeal^to^S^SBI® Present: Shri H.S.Patet, counsel for ttie appUcanfc ShriSanjayK.^rawral,couRseMoFthe-(^p<»Ktent. ORAL.OnBEita' . ' :'! fasse<t8h;08:(».20<^ He9rdonl.A,NoX)1for.coadwiaBon<rfdNaylRflU^g4hwMX;^;, 2. Notopposed. 3. I.A.No.Ol is attewed and the detey inflBBg^^BM^-S-is condoned. 4. HMnionM.CXS.flnalty. 5. For the reason& TOenttoned in Uw an»lfea8o^^tfc©A)^* ® allc>wedandtheSecoiid^pealNo.3S<frM^^^ihtahwasdismiMed md^utton 3.3^008, isrestoredtofite and be tisted. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ^ oW