:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1640 OF 2006 Manoj Anant Gaonkar ...Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. Mr. N. Shah with Mr. A.K. Gupta, Mrs. S. Gite, Mr. Pravin Contracter, Ms. Alex Almeida i/b V.N. Shingnapurkar for the applicant. Ms. S.V. Gajre, APP for the State. ---- CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J. DATE: DATE: DATE: 4th May, 2006 4th May, 2006 4th May, 2006 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant was arrested in connection with the offence punishable under sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 511 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The investigation is over. The charge-sheet has been filed. 3. The learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that even in the reply which was filed in the Court of Sessions it was mentioned that stringent condition may be imposed by the Court that the applicant should not :2: leave the City of Greater Mumbai without permission of the Court. 4. Since the charge-sheet is over and all the documents have been seized and are in possession of the Investigating Officer, in my view, there is no reason why the applicant should be detained in jail. The applicant, therefore, be released on bail in the sum of Rs 25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. The applicant shall not leave the City of Greater Mumbai without permission of this Court. The applicant shall report to the concerned Investigating Officer, GB, CID EOW-III, Mumbai twice in a month and also as and when he is called. 5. Application is allowed in the above terms and disposed of accordingly. V.M. V.M. V.M. KANADE, J. KANADE, J. KANADE, J.