IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3703 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.481 OF 2005 Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai. ..Applicant. Vs. Shri. Dayabhai M. Harijan and ors. ..Respondents. Mrs. Vandana Mahadik for the Applicant. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 18th October,2008 PC : 1. This is an application made by the applicant for substituted service. According to the applicant service was effected by RPAD but there is no reference as to the endorsement that was made by the postal authorities on the envelope. Envelope is shown to me and I find that there is no endorsement regarding the refusal of the letter. It is also stated in the application that bailiff pasted the notice on the outer door . It is also pointed out that when the clerk went to serve the notice, he found that they were not residing on the given address. In the circumstances, issue fresh notice to the respondents in the first appeal, returnable on 12.12.2008. If notice is returned unserved then proper application be made for substituted service. Hence, present application is dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)