IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.376 of 2010 MD. AFTAB ALAM @ AFTAB IDRISI SON OF LATE MD.NIZAM IDRISI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHARIGAWA,P.S.CHAINPUR,DISTT.KAIMUR(BHABUA) Versus STATE OF BIHAR For the petitioner : Mr.Kumar Sunil For the State : Mr.Addl.P.P. For the complainant: Mr.Rajni Kant Pandey ----------- 2/ 18.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Though the case was filed under Sections 498(A),406,341 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 27 of the Arms Act and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, cognizance has been taken only for offences under Sections 498(A) and 406 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner is in jail custody since 16.9.2009 in a complaint case. The petitioner has expressed his desire to keep the complainant with full dignity which she deserves. While opposing the prayer for bail of the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant submits that the complainant also wants that she should be kept by the petitioner. The complainant is well advised to move the family court and make such prayer. Thereafter the family court will do the needful. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur (Bhabua) in Complaint Case No. 1512 of 2008. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)