bv Q "Imam“ @ da‘ed smGLE wwi N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ‘ AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. Zql—H Of 2006 PETITIONER : / Rahas Lal Ratre S/o Late Shri about 4.0 working as Upper Division Clerk posted at Offlce of Ch1ef Executlve Offlcer , Janpad Panchayat rPali, District Korba , permanent resident of Jarhabhata, Bilaspur (CG); Ganga Ram Ratre , aged V~aw VERSUS RESPONDENTS “M1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary , Women v 'and Child , Development Department, Mantralay ,D. K. S. BhawanvRaipur (CG). t . The Commissioner . Women and Child Development Department , ChhattiSgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Pali, District Korba (CG). v s B M“ I I Ix 4. Collector, Women and Child Be Development, Korba, Tahsil and District Korba (CG. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE Zé/ 227’ QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ARMI ) é W i %\ XI-HC—22 EW,WW,W anéwruams W ma"? V . WW§WW mfg W WWWW , mf§mm K ;—§;20cé Mr. ShaiieFIdm Dubey, :ourisel for“ fha p2?i‘i’imer. Mr. GK. Eeriwal, Def y Advocafe 6eneml far fhe SfaTe/ Fespmdems N01, 2 & 4, on q vance copy. Heard. By fhe insfan'? wrifi p ‘H'Hm uncier Arfide 22%/22770f ‘H’re Consfifu‘l’ion n‘f IHdig, fhe pe+ fioner has challenged his *raHsfer order dafed 6—?—2006 passed by pondgarw No.4, whereby 'Hm pe‘HTioner has been Transferred from Pa i 1’63 Karmlu. The case 0f The pa H‘ioner is Thar? 1'he pa‘H‘Honer is a handicapped person having ph sicai disabiii’ry a-F 45%. He has been fransferred 1’0 :1 place which i inure fhan 105 kms. ‘Fram The presem’ place of posting and in his placv ;, rm one is posi'ed. Fur-Thar case af fhe pe'l’i‘fioner is 'l'ha'r his sisfer Lilly depends upor’r him a‘nd she is alsc suffering frcm Chesi cam , as such, she requires regular ahd prelohged ireeimehi‘ The p ’li'iioner has been 'l'r‘ahsfer-r'ed ‘io cm inferior“ place where ho medical fecili‘ries are available Leamed munsei for fhe peh‘honer submifs Thai fhe pei‘x‘honer may be alluwed fa make a repr senfa’non +0 respondenf No 1 To which learned caunsel appearing for he STaTe/respondenfe Nail, 2 & 4 has no objecfion. (q‘ia W) f : s e XI-HC-22 man mm WW WW§WW mmw Havim heard learned caunsei for fhe parfies, having regarrj ‘fo fhe fac‘fs and circumsmnces of The case and wifhau‘r expressing any npinion on meri‘i’s of fhe case, fhe prayer made by learned caunsel far The pe‘fh‘ioner appears f0 be JUST, fair and reasonaiaie. Therefare, fhe aammm %€ QLQI’ $ Soma ‘pe‘HTioner is aHowed f0 make a defaifed represen'r'a'l'ion annexing cepy af fhe insfan'r wri'i' pefi'fion, raising aii his grievances fa respbnden? No.1 wi‘rhin fen days fram miay and in mm, respanden‘i’ No.1 snail days from +he da're of ifs receip‘i', considering all fhe grievances raised by rhe pe'li‘l'ioner, in an objeci’ive decide 'i'he same wi'i‘i’iin 30 manner, in accordance wifh iaw‘ Wifh fhe direci’ion afore of. Consequenfiy, M.(W.)P.Nz: Ferries are en‘i‘ined fan a .3065/2a9é c'ee grands dispnaed mg. :ri‘ified eep’y’ a1: fnis orti2L~—— Sd/— L.C. Bhadao Judge (me W) said, “die wril pen‘nsn srands dispcsed