IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER MONDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2008 / 2ND ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 18270 of 2008(S) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- ASSOCIATION FOR SOCIAL RIGHTS, KOTTAYAM, REGISTRATION NO.K.509/2004 REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, MANI JACOB, MAZHUKKAT HOUSE, VEDIPURA LANE, COLLECTORATE POST, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K) SRI.AJEESH K.SASI RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE KERALA UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, TRIVANDRUM. 3. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM. 4. THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (CUSAT) , REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, COCHIN. 5. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT. 6. THE KANNUR UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, KANNUR. 7. THE SREE SANKARA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, KALADY. R1 - BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. MEERA. R2 - BY SRI. M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, S.C. KERALA UTD. R3 - BY SRI. T.A..SHAJI , SC. M.G.UTY. R4 - BY SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI,SC,COCHI UTY. R5 - BY SRI. P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC. CALICUT UTY. R6 - BY SRI.M.SASEENDRAN,SC,KANNUR UNIVERSITY R7 - SRI.P.K.VIJAYAMOHANAN,SC,SANKARACHA.UTY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L. DATTU, C.J. & A.K. BASHEER, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P (C) No. 18270 of 2008-S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2008 Judgment H.L. Dattu, C. J: In this Public Interest Litigation the petitioner is seeking a direction to the first respondent viz., the State Government to conduct a detailed enquiry into various incidents narrated in the writ petition and to publish the report on the same as early as possible. 2. When the matter had been posted before the court on the earlier occasion, we had informed the learned counsel for the petitioner Sri. Mathew John to make an appropriate representation before the first respondent bringing out all his grievances in that representation and if for any reason that representation is not considered, then he may approach this Court for appropriate reliefs. 3. Sri.Mathew John, learned counsel, would submit that his client would be making a representation before the first respondent within 15 days' time from today and if such a representation is made, a direction may is issued to the first respondent, to consider the said representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 4. At this stage we do not intend to make any observation while disposing of this writ petition. We only say that the writ petition filed by the petitioner is premature and therefore the writ petition is disposed of for the present. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court, if need arises in future. WP(C).18270/08. 2 5. It is needless to say that if and when a representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered by the first respondent in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU Chief Justice A.K. BASHEER Judge an.