IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- Crl. Misc. No. M- 33338 of 2008 Date of Decision:- 6.3.2009 Abhishek Puri & Ors. Versus U.T. Chandigarh & Ors. Crl. Misc. No. M- 33336 of 2008 Date of Decision:- 6.3.2009 Gurpartap Singh Mann & Ors. Versus U.T. Chandigarh & Ors. Present:- Ashwani Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner in (Crl. Misc. No. M- 33338 of 2008) Mr.Sanjiv Sheroran, Advocate, for the petitioner in (Crl. Misc. No. M- 33336 of 2008) Mr. P.K.Khindria, Advocate, for U.T., Chandigarh. Mr. Sanjiv Sheoran, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 to 6. (Crl. Misc. No. M- 33336 of 2008) Mr. Ashwani Verma, Advocate, for respondent No. 6. M.M.S.BEDI. (J) (Oral) This order will dispose of two petitions, one is Crl. Misc. No. 33338- M of 2008 for quashing of FIR No. 248, dated 2.8.2007, under Sections 147, 149, 323, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sector -11, Chandigarh and another is Crl. Misc. No. 33336-M of 2008 for quashing of FIR No. 249, dated 2.8.2007, under Sections 147, 149, 323 and 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sector -11, Chandigarh, on the basis of compromise. Former FIR was registerd at the instance of respondent No. 2 Nitin Rathee, alleging that petitioners had assaulted him and other- respondents. Later FIR was registered against Gurpartap Singh Mann and others on the complaint of Tejpal Cheema alleging that he along with other respondents were attacked by the petitioners on 2.8.2007. Petitioners, complainants and all the injured are present in Court. They have stated that the matter has been compromsied vide compromise Crl. Misc. No. M- 33338 of 2008 -2- Annexure P-2 dated 3.8.2007. A perusal of the FIR in both the cases indicate that the parties were students at the time of the incident and the dispute had arisen during the election days of Students Council in Panjab University. Parties are present in Court and also have given oral undertaking not to repeat the similar incident in the Panjab University campus. In view of the judgment of Kulwinder Singh & Ors VS. State of Punjab, 2007(3)RCR (Crl) 1052, the FIR can be quashed on the basis of compromise. Taking into consideration, the above circumstances, I do not find any reason not to quash the above FIR especially when both the parties were students at the time of the occurrence and that both the parties by appearing in Court have undertaken not to commit the similar offence of which they are accused of in the criminal cases mentioned above. Accordingly, the petitions are allowed. FIR No. 248, dated 2.8.2007, FIR No. 249, dated 2.8.2009 and all the criminal proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed on the basis of compromise. March 6, 2009 (M.M.S.Bedi) tripti Judge