wni3i.K 'f^s IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTrSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) N0. 5>S^ /2010 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIAt PETITIQNER :^--"^ ^s-^ 1, 2. 3. 4. Smt. Yashoda Meshram (Before marriage Ku. Yashoda Ramteke), aged about 47 years, W/o Sukumar Meshram, occupation - Asst. Teacher, Presently working as Head Master, Govt Girls Primary School- Mohala, Vikas Khand - Mohala, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Tribal, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur / (C.G.) Asst. Commissioner, Deptt of -- Tribal, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) Joint Director (Treasury, A/c & Pension), Raipur (CG) Block Education Officer, Block - Mohala, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG). PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER ^^ ,.@,fc;i^^K. S; "5^=E.£i XI-HC—78 3D^r W (<-< ?TefT 5FIT^?T s»>*4N) "g'ST "'^I^K'1'4, EStfll<-l<IS, fqC1l'Mlj,< . w^f^^^l •^200 sn^r -^v (Tpi^^d) TBiiw^feisn^i SB : Hon'ble Shri IVIanlndra Motkan Shrivastava, J 29-07.2010 Shri A. N. Bhakta, counsel Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel advance oopy. Heard. Learned counsel appearirj petitioner Js entitled to benefit of she having passed B.T.1. examin^t cost. It is submitted that the issut longer res integra and the same Supreme Court in the oase of As 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59. It is fur| taken a similar view in his W.P.(S)No. 6257 of 2008. Leamec) attention of this Court. to order d< No. 124 of 2009, wherein relying in the oase of Asha Saxena (supr^ another Writ Appeal No.87/200|9 consideration of the case for ciroular dated 21-09-1974 issued verifioation ofthe facts pleaded in Learned counsel for the petitioner would also be considerei|l gre|nt <=bt^T^Tt 'RFRTf ^ t^t' 'i.f^-(•$}< ^?3ffin<ffl^?( br the petitioner. Lawyer for the State/respondents on |g for the petitioner submits that the two advance increments on acoount of |tion before her appojntment at her own ^ involved in the present petition is no ^as been finally deoided by the Hon'ble ^ha Saxena vs. State of M.P. & Ors., ther submitted that this Court has also lorder dated 06-02-2009 passed in oounsel )br the petitioner further draws jted 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appea! the judgment of the Supreme Court I) and the order passed by this Court in directions have been issued for of two advanoe inorements as per py the State of Madhya Pradesh, after |he petition. r^spondents submits that oase of the on the same lines. upon il i ..-^{W-.St-ii;. -^ ^p5^: ¥&- :—7S 75T -^WW^, ©fll^'Ko,fi|diy^< wP(^^^(l$^o sn^T^^Cyi^^) 311^1 qil n;-fjcb ?T2ff ^n^n shiiitft Tumans ^RIW ^lfCT sd^l In view of the statement hiade above, this petition is finally decide the olaim of the petitioner fc| '»il<([n<lll'qTITClf'? feA TfsR^R '^affiman^r disposed of with a direction to the r^spondent authorities to consider and grant of two advance inorements as per circular dated 21-09-1974 issu^d by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification ofthe facts pleadeij) in the petitjon within a period ofeight weeks from today. —-^ SdA Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge .