sat 1 wp 188-2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 188 OF 2011 Smt.Rahimabi Shaikh @ Fantoosh ...Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Dinesh Kadam for the Petitioner. Dr.F.R. Shaikh, APP for the State. Ms.Rohini Wagh and Godia Shaikh for Respondent No.4. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & U.D. SALVI, JJ. JULY 6, 2011 P.C. :- 1 We have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2 It is noticed that there were two different CRs registered against the petitioner i.e. CR No. 287/2010 and CR No.353/2010. 3 In CR No.353/2010, she had applied for sat 2 wp 188-2011 anticipatory bail but she was shown absconding in CR No.287/2010. On 26th April, 2010 when she was traced in the court premises, she came to be arrested in connection with CR No.287/2010 which was registered for the offence punishable under Section 326 read with 34 of IPC. 4 This arrest is challenged on the grounds that respondent no.4 was not the Investigating Officer and there was no case warranting such an arrest. 5 We specifically asked the learned Counsel for the petitioner whether she was produced for remand within 24 hours and he could not give any reply. His actual challenge is that respondent no.4 did not have any authority to arrest the petitioner. We are not impressed by these submissions. Respondent no.4 is the Assistant Commissioner of Police from the very same police station where the CR was registered. 5 Hence, we are satisfied that no case is made sat 3 wp 188-2011 out to show our indulgence in a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 6 The petition is dismissed. (U.D. SALVI, J) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J)