c ^ • \^Q(r IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH [^ W.P,No^g'^/06 PETITIONER .^£^. /^^w^ ...-•<..^1?""" ^yy^ ^' v RESPONDENT ^ ^";, •t € .^^•^'~" .V* ^rv^^ "V --AiF -.'?' (p t.- _/ Advin Poul (wrongly mentioned as Admin Poul in impugned order), S/o Shri John Poul Aged about 58 Yrs. BIock Extention Educator, Presently posted at, Community HeaKIiCenter, Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.), R/o Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS / 1. StateofC.G. Through : Secretary, Health & Public Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 2. Block Medical Officer, Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrrUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT, WRITS, ORDER, DIRECTIONS ETC. [- XI-HC-22 3^ -^l'tllcl^, t9tnwic, l»i<fliyy sn^sfrw ^iwsn^i a>fi»yf(d 3TT^?I tfTHen ShHlth RTqsith ^..^.^.T.l^^o Rres 3D^TWIIWlfeT '2-7-2- Shri Manish Sharma, coun^i Miss Dipali Pandey, Pane| advance copy. Heard both the counsel. The main arievance raisedl that he is working as Block Ext^ Centre, Kurud, he has been trans) dated 29-6-2006 by respondent N| and Health Officer, Jashpur cor effected on the request of the petit| Learned counse! for the d never made such a request and h< his own request and that is why order itseff that they are transfer counse! for the petitioner further may be allowed to make a detaile< rectitying this mistake to which objection. Having heard iearned coun record, without expressing any o[ made by tearned counse! for the therefore, the petitioner is aliows along with copy of this petition to days from today and in turn, resp< decide representation of the petitio +ioi<'t^-) Kiti<A'irtel<rl <Rt^i< ^isrf^iffw^r for the petitioner. .awyer for the State/respondents, on by the petitloner in this writ petition is nsion Educator at Community Health erred on his own expenses vide order to Jashpur under the ChieT Medical isidering that the transfer has been letitioner submitted that the petitioner has been transferred on the ground of has been mentionedin the impugned |ed on their own expenses. Learned lubmitted that, therefore, the petitioner representation to respondent No.1 for irned counsel for respondents has no |el for ihe partiss, having perused the |nion on the merit of the case, prayer lietitioner is just, fair and reasonable, ip to make a detailed representation (espondent No.1 within a period of 10 •tident No.1 is directed to consider and ijier within a period of 30 days from the ('te^^r) XI-HC-22 STI^TW R-ii+sn^r shiwtllsa Barve > /€ 3^T •<ii<iici<4, aiTdu'is, |s|cliy^< sni^r qiftb *O*<MI st»n«B w^ 200 f^'b.A W^tl g'WIWBfer -2-- date of Teceipt of representationj with !aw. However, as the petitioner| the petitioner whereas, no such the post where the petitioner is \[ view of the above, effect and respect of the petitioner shal representation. With the direction aforesai<( Consequently, M.(W.)P. N^ Parties are entitled for In an objective manner, in accordance has been transferred on the request of }equest was made by the petitioner and ^orking is still lying vacant, therefore, in op4ration of the impugned transfer order in remain stayed tilt the decision of the i, the petition stands disposed of. 1>.2604/2006 also stands disposed of. copyofthisorder. certlfied <tii<<?fi<(l-i *<i*f<aTffte<^l'<Ri«K ^arf^Tan^T sdl- L.C. Bh&8oo judge (<ft^y^) \