1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10787 OF 2004 Mahavir Kothari . .. Petitioner. vs. Meghna Kothari .. Respondent . Mr. G.S. Godbole for petitioner. Mr. Sriniwas S Patwardhan for respondent. CORAM : S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 6th December, 2005. P.C.: . The impugned order challenges the fixation of maintenance of Rs. 20,000/- per month. The trial Court after considering the facts of the present case has come to the conclusion that there is sufficient income of the petitioner to make payment. The trial Court has come to the conclusion that the income of the petitioner is about Rs. 75,000/- per month from the hospital. The petitioner is the doctor by profession. The petitioner is also living a luxurious life having a car and an investment of about 1,07,000/- in the Public Provident Fund. After consideration of the 2 aforesaid aspects, the trial court has come to the conclusion that the petitioner should pay maintenance of Rs. 20,000/- per month to the respondent wife. I do not find any error apparent on the face of the record to interfere with the quantum of maintenance fixed by the trial Court. Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.