nt 'THE HON®!^Hl©HCSQUit^QF CHHAaT*ISt3AR» :',:;'';':'1,.;.::.'1:..'.:;AT'^BIIA!S:PUR- ^ ,:.1(-1',-:;.;::^^V^:^SS%:!S .W.P.{Sl;;NO.;'%-^'s31^-''' •/2010^ PgTKFlONERS .^Y^ .i^i^. 'M^--"^ l^?!!^^ ^•^•^1^^ Digeshwar Diwah, S/'Er^iaalel; G.R. Diwan, aged^ ..a|:><:)ulT|jSS; years,. currently,; .posted: .^stt; Greeri Hunf. Bastar, Distti®astaE;(e.;GK^ •''..-^(^'"•^..n.**'.. 'Ssi'^ ItESI'QNDBNTS : 1 2. •3£ • State 6f Chhaftisgarii^ •,.. ^ 4'%%?i Thrpugh :- The Seeretary, ; ^';^ ; Department, Qf^ HQra.e.-.: ,'^.:%@% Mantralaya, D.K.'S.'Bfoaiw£LEt,%S RaipuF(C.G.):;.^.;::''.^^::^^.^^^^^ Director General^ of Eola.ce,' Pplice Head Quarters;*Rarpu:r, ,Ch.haffisgasrIi.;: il'.::^:^'':'.l^il.%^;i^ CHaimian, 'i^ '^.^^^VBaScei: Establishmenf Boai-d,^Ralipur^ Chhattisgarh. • .:' • ' v:?^ Inspector General ' of ^ i'oliee; (Admn.); Poliee Headguai'eers^ Raipur, ChhafttSgasrli.^ .;.'^^ Inspector General af, ,S>QJ3G^: .(Naxal •'l'::'^.'•.'©pei'afiQlaj^ ^Chtiafti!SgarK.'':"'.';:';:';IS '®i;^ywy WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22®QF TH& <^ONSTiTUTlONC»FlNDIft. 4. s. B KBi w II MM a H .1^^a ;iM.iui«iy««.i,i.a, iBSBSSB fssRssa ^i<3H<^ym^R^HI-im%i^ARWA"I"Blt..ASRUR ^^^^^^^^^ ^ PeUtioner •g' Vereus ^Digeshwar:Diwan, :;.•,;•; y,;: StateofChhaajsgarh&others. WRtTREIlf>GNyNBE&^TICI-E22&OFTI-iECQNSTn'OTIONO(:lNDIA ^SB:H^ PTcselM:- Shn^haiterKlraDubsy.^vocatefoi'thepeititibner. SKriN.N.Bpv, Panef^awverlorth&State/respordentsg y 4. ORD@5t^ORAI^ loi'i7 1^i^oMy!ay, Heai'illean&ffcQi.insSI'for'tKe-BSrties. ? Gase^pf the^piMitioner 1s tBat the^pefitioner v^ p House Qffiee^ Pbtice^^St^ion.Kar^ Without completion \6f t^^^^^ KaryroaQyKc^a^ pistnct Bitaspuir by Order dateB 07-1t-20Q9^ (Anneaire P/1) thegpetitioner,^^^^^t^ against^ th&..p^jsio^ pm CHh^isgarhpdic6^Gt^OG^^rshort'^2QO^'^.^^^^^^^^^^ Seetion 14 ofth^Wet,{2007iprow8es^ exigere%, ifthesame i&t'eK^ emRloye8,the'baroFtw&yea!^l'mayAe^ifted.\'j~i/''.:,^.;.,'.,^ In tfie case on Kand,i|eamed?G6unsel forfhepe^oBer ther&isno^^uey'onthepaffiof^petitiQnerand administr^ve exigeneyt there yras n<^ing^r^ make rsasbns^r transfsmng the^ p^ sub^edton (2)<>f Spction 14 ofthe'Act, 2007. Shri Dybey.fiarthef submits?that- trahsfeTord8r;l^pefitionsTpi^r dari,apgealur^ of Section 22oftHeAet, 2007 totheftd4itiorffilDire(^ .//"'^\ jf !iissfe» 1 "'"'••SK^^^, '.'J^ 'iis,,»iie Arun 8. 2 Police (Naxal Qperation),,Pb[ice Headquarter, Raipur, on 23..11,2009 (Annexure P/4) . , , Sub-section (3) of Section 22 of the Act, 2007 proyjdes for consideration and disposal of representation within a penod of 90 days from tHe date of orcter. 90 days hav^ lapsed; the Poltee EstaBlishment Board has not passed any order. It appears that ttife provisions of the Act, 2007 has been violated at Iwo places r.e. flnst^ while passing the transfer order without assigning the reasons and secondly, by not considering the appeal/representatjon within 90 days,whichisstetut6rypres.enbedlimit. At hjs juncture, Shri Rby, learned counsel fortheState, submitsthat the pending appeal/representation pfthe petitioner, before thePolice Estabtishment Board, the same shall be considered and decided within aperiodof14days. / In view of foregoing, withQUt examining the merits of the case, the Director General of Police/resDondent No. 2 is directed to consider and decide the pending apDeat/'representation ofthe petitionerwithin aperiodof14daysfromtheiciateofreceiptcrfaGopyofthtsorc|er. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. However, it is made clear that till disposa! of the appeal/represerrtation, the impugned order dated 07.11.2009 (Annexura P/1), passed in respect of the petitioner, shall not be given effect to. ^^.»-0,ri