1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2718 OF 2001 Mr.Chandrakant Surve, Insurance Inspector. ..Applicant. V/s. Smt.Clemic Pinto(since deceased) & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.H.V.Mehta for applicant. Mr.S.V.Gajare, APP for State. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : NOVEMBER 24, 2005. DATE : NOVEMBER 24, 2005. DATE : NOVEMBER 24, 2005. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Inspite of service, none appears for respondents. 2. I see no infirmity in the approach of the Magistrate on the finding reached that the respondent accused were conducting business of laundry which is not covered by the scope of the Act as is observed by the Apex Court in the case of Employees’ State Employees’ State Employees’ State Insurance Corporation vs. Triplex Dry.Cleaners & Insurance Corporation vs. Triplex Dry.Cleaners & Insurance Corporation vs. Triplex Dry.Cleaners & Ors., reported in 1998 (3) LLN 574. Ors., reported in 1998 (3) LLN 574. Ors., reported in 1998 (3) LLN 574. No interference is warranted. Hence, rejected.