..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2690 OF 2008 Shri.Montu Purna Mohanti. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Mr.Ujwal Agandsurve, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 21st August, 2008. DATED : 21st August, 2008. DATED : 21st August, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R. No.I-43 of 2008 of Central Police Station, Ulhasnagar. The said case is under Sections 341, 342, 363(a), 328, 366, 504, 506, 376 r/w. 34 of IPC and under Sections 3, 4 & 6 of PITA Act. 3. The applicant had earlier preferred an application for bail before this Court. The said application came to be rejected. However, at that time the charge-sheet was not filed. Thereafter the charge-sheet came to be filed. In this view ..(2).. of the matter, in my opinion, it would be appropriate that the applicant is granted liberty to prefer a fresh application for bail before the Sessions Court. On such application being preferred before the learned Sessions Court, the learned Sessions Court to consider the same afresh and dispose it of on merits without being influenced by any of the observations in the order dated 11.7.2008. 4. With the above observation, Criminal Application is disposed of. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)