IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.2899 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:14.09.2011 Mohammad Arshad Ansari ....Appellant Versus The State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate for the appellant. * * * RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL) The appellant has approached this Court by way of instant appeal challenging award dated 14.08.2010 on the ground that compensation awarded is on the lower side. However, market value of the acquired land was determined @ Rs.280/- per square yard, in terms of judgment dated 01.09.2009 passed in RFA No.4438 of 2008 titled as State of Haryana and another vs. Sailak Ram and others. Thus, the appellant has already been granted compensation as per the aforesaid judgment passed in RFA No.4438 of 2008 which has arisen out of the same acquisition. Learned counsel for the appellant could not dispute the aforesaid fact. Thus, this appeal is without any merit and the same is dimissed. Since this appeal has been dismissed on merits, the application for condonation of delay of 120 days in filing this appeal does not survive. September 14, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) savita JUDGE