1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.414 OF 2008 Bhaskar Ganesh Mahamuni ..Applicant V/s Krishnanand Purushottam Deo ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Dani, Advocate, for the applicant Mr.V.G.Peshave, Advocate, for the respondent CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATE : 13TH JANUARY, 2009 P.C. . This is the tenant's Civil Revision Application against the concurrent decree passed against him under Section 16(1)(n) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Both the Courts below on consideration of the evidence before them have recorded a concurrent finding that there was non user of the tenanted premises making the tenant liable for eviction under Section 16(1)(n) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Hence, considering the concurrent decree passed no case for interference under Section 115 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Civil Revision Application is accordingly disposed of. 2. On the usual undertaking furnished by the applicant which will cover his family members also, the decree will not be executed till 31st May, 2009. The said undertaking to be filed within a period of four weeks from date. In the event the undertaking is not filed, the respondent would be free to execute the decree in accordance with law. (R.M.SAVANT, J.)