IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 10TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 19TH KARTHIKA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1626 of 2008(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.35772/2007 Dated 03/12/2007 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION --------------- REGHUNATHAN, AGED 73 YEARS, S/O. GOVINDAN (RETD. P.F. COMMISSIONER), TC.4/695, KRISHNENDU, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.THIRUMALA P.K.MANI SMT.R.ARYA RESPONDENTS/1ST AND 2ND RESPONDENTS IN THE WRIT PETITION --------------- 1. TOM JOSE, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN) SECRETARY, P.W.D., GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. B.DILEEP KUMAR, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN) SECRETARY, TRIVANDRUM DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (TRIDA), JAYAMANSION, VAZHUTHACAUD, SASTAMANGALAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695010. ADV. SRI.K.A.JALEEL, SC., TRIDA FOR R2 GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Contempt of Court Case No.1626/08 in W.P.(c).No. 35772 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 10th day of November , 2008 JUDGMENT Heard both sides. I do not think that the petitioner is justified in accusing the respondents of having committed contempt of Annexure A7 judgment. Contempt of court case will stand dismissed. However, this judgment will not stand in the way of the petitioner challenging the order passed by the High Level Committee, in accordance with law. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE sv.