IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO.51 OF 2010 Dt.01.2.2010 Between: Koribilli Rama Satyanarayana … Appellant And The Andhra University, Visakhapatnam Rep. by its Registrar and another … Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Sri S.M. Subhan Counsel for the Respondents: Sri M.V. Raja Raam THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO.51 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy) In this Writ Appeal, the appellant questioned order dt.04.11.2009 passed in Writ Petition No.20493 of 2008, whereby the learned Single Judge dismissed the Writ Petition filed by the appellant. We have heard Sri S.M. Subhan, learned Counsel for the appellant, and Sri M.V. Raja Ram, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. In pursuance of the notification issued by the respondents, the appellant applied for admission to Ph.D. course in the Department of Metallurgical Engineering. The appellant was given admission vide letter dt.13.4.2008 subject to the condition that he shall produce Transfer Certificate and Migration Certificate from the university where he last studied. The last date for admission was 03.05.2008. As the appellant has not produced the Transfer Certificate and Migration Certificate by that date, the respondents having waited for one week thereafter, addressed a letter dt.10.5.2008 to the appellant cancelling the admission of the appellant and returned the demand draft. In view of the admitted fact that the appellant failed to produce the Transfer Certificate and Migration Certificate, which was one of the conditions of his admission, the learned Single Judge declined to interfere with the cancellation of the admission made by the respondents. Having carefully considered the submissions of the learned Counsel for the parties, we are of the view that the respondents have not committed any illegality in cancelling the admission, as the Transfer Certificate and the Migration Certificate, which are necessary for admission were not produced by the appellant before the stipulated time, i.e., the last date for admissions. Therefore, we do not find any reason to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Judge. It is, however, made clear that the appellant is entitled to apply for admission into Ph.D. course afresh as and when the vacancies are notified by the respondents. The Writ Appeal is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Appeal, W.A.M.P. No.136 of 2010, filed by the appellant/petitioner for interim relief, is dismissed. ______________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ ______________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 01.02.2010 bnr