IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 11765 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION : 11.07.2008 Parhlad .... PETITIONER Versus State of Haryana and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present: Mr. Sanjay Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.1 to 4 to register an FIR under Section 302 IPC against respondents No.5 and 6. After hearing counsel for the petitioner and in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu versus State of U.P. and others, 2008 (1) RCR (Criminal) 392 and the decision of this Court in M/s Larsen and Toubro Ltd. versus Central Bureau of Investigation, 2007 (1) RCR (Criminal) 706, and in the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find the instant case to be an CWP No. 11765 of 2008 -2- exceptional case, where this Court should exercise its inherent power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing direction to register a criminal case, as in our view, the petitioner has an alternative remedy available to him under the Code of Criminal Procedure. Dismissed. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE July 11, 2008 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) ndj JUDGE