IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.: 7539 of 2010. Decided on: 18.03.2011. _____________________________________________________ Sanjeev Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.4. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. Anup Rattan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No.7687 of 2010, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the same is dismissed having infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. Ad-interim order, dated 1.12.2010 is vacated. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. March 18, 2011. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?