IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN SATURDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2009 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 13795 of 2009(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- LILLY, AGED 44 YEARS,W/O. TOMY, VADAKKEDATHU HOUSE, PALAKKUZHY DESOM, KIZHAKKANCHERY VILLAGE, ALATHUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS SRI.M.R.DHANIL RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE S.I. OF POLICE, VADAKKENCHERY ( (MALABAR) POLICE STATION, P.O. VADAKKENCHERY, PALAKKAD DT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKKAD, DISTRICT, P.O. PALAKKAD. 3. V.T. TOMY, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O. ANTONY, VADAKKEDATHU HOUSE, P.O. PALAKKUZHY, KIZHAKKANCHERY VILLAGE, ALATHUR TALUK. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.A. SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) 13795 /2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: THE BT RECEIPTS FOR THE YEARS 2002-03 AND 2006-07 IN RESPECT OF TWO ACRES OF LANDED PROPERTY. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RET CHIT DATED 14.5.2009 EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER WITH THE HOUSE OWNER FOR TAKING A HOUSE AT KAMANTHARA ON A MONTHLY RENT OF RS. 700/-. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ADMISSION CUM DISCHARGE CARD DATED 5.4.2009 ISSUED FROM THE TALUK HEAD QUARTERS HOSPITAL, WADAKKANCHERY. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 29.3.2009 MADE BY THE PETITIONER TO THE S.I. OF POLICE, VADAKKENCHERY (MALABAR) POLICE STATION. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER FOR SENDING COPIES OF EXHIBIT P3 AND P4 TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF POSTING FOR SENDING EXHIBITS P3 TO P5 TO R1 AND R2. EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICIE DATED 8.5.2009 SENT BY ADV. BABU SIVADAS OF ALATHUR TO THE PETITIOENR AT THE INSTANCE OF 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. // TRUE COPY // P.S. TO JUDGE. P.R. RAMAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) NO. 13795 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 23RD DAY OF MAY, 2009. J U D G M E N T Raman, J. Govt. Pleader submits that the husband is absconding. Hence as and when the husband returns, it is open to the petitioner to prefer a separate writ petition as at present no cause for granting any protection arises. The writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach this Court if an occasion arises. P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE. KNC/-