IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2008 / 28TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 36264 of 2007(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- ISSAC P.MARATTUKULAM, A.112, KANAKA NAGAR, KAWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.ANILKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. KERALA UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, UNIVERSITY OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC, KERALA UNIVERSITY SR.GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 36264 OF 2008 P ===================== Dated this the 18th day of January, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner has approached this court praying to quash Ext.P2 and to declare that he is entitled to the benefit of Ext.P1. By Ext.P1, the benefit of moderation was extended including to those appearing for supplementary examination. Petitioner contends that this benefit has been taken away by Ext.P2. 2. According to the standing counsel for the University, Ext.P2 does not have the effect of depriving the benefit of moderation for students appearing in supplementary examination. Subject to the other regulations based on which this benefit is extended, the benefit of moderation provided for in Exts. P1 and P2 will continue to be available to the students appearing for supplementary examination as well. This is the submission made by the standing counsel for the University. I record the submission and close this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp