IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1913 of 2009 RAMLAL MANDAL @ RAMLAL KUMAR Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 11.12.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that double barrel gun with three cartridges and single barrel gun with three cartridges were recovered from the possession of the major co-accused, namely, Manoj Mandal and Binod Mandal, who have already been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court after remaining in custody for a period of near about eight months. Further submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that to juvenile, some privilege is given. It means to say that some liberal view should be taken for the petitioner but he could not be released only due to his being juvenile. He is in custody since 01.12.2008 for a period of more than one year. So, the petitioner entitles for bail which has not been considered by the Courts below. I agree with the submission advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the revision petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 17.09.2009 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 45 of 2009 by the learned Sessions Judge along with the order dated 28.07.2009 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board is set aside and the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Katihar in connection with Kursela P.S. Case No. 129 of 2009 (G.R. No. 2814 of 2008) One of the bailers shall be the father of the petitioner, who 2 would undertake to keep the petitioner under his observation and produced whenever is required by the Juvenile Justice Board or Court. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)