IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4592 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 25.08.2009 Sheo Chand .....Petitioner versus Anarkali .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Jonney Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 8.8.2009, passed by the learned District Judge, Karnal, whereby warrants of arrest for his civil imprisonment have been issued against the petitioner for his persistent failure to pay the arrears of maintenance to the respondent-wife. The impugned order reveals and is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner-husband has not paid the arrears of maintenance pendente lite fixed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and all the efforts made by the Court for recovery have been humbled down. C.R. No.4592 of 2009 (O&M) 2 The petitioner-husband has statedly disposed of the immovable assets also so as to defeat the fruits of the Court's order to which the respondent-wife is entitled to, In these circumstances, the recourse adopted by the learned District Judge, Karnal is fully justified in law. Dismissed. 25-08-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE