Singie Bench : Hon'ble ShriDiiiD Raosaheb Deshmukh.J, I.A.C. N0.35S '€.:- iicant] {Non-apDiicant No.2i ^^:.'-. National Insurance Company Limited, Through Branch Manager, Branch Office, Vyapar Vihar Road, Taha Complex, iilaspur (CG) Versus 1. Guiab Gond, S/o Late Chamru, aged 24 years, R/o Binauri, & Post Office Kathakoni, Tah & P.S. Takhtpur, Distt.. Bilaspur (GG) 2. Prahlad Sriwas, S/o Khorbahra Sriwas, aged 36 years, R/o Viliage Ameri, Tahsil- Takhatpur, P.S. Chaka'rbhata, Distt. Bilaspur (CO) i 3. AmarjeetSingh Bhagas, S/o Niranjan Singh (dead) . Legai Representatives:- (A) Smt Gurmeet Kaur, Wd/o Late Amarjeet Slngh, aged not known. (B) Harmeet Kaur, D/o Late AmarjeeS Singh, aged about 21 years. (C) Harspal Singh, S/o Late Amarjeet Singh, aged about2 Syears (D) Niranjan Singh Bhagat, S/o Late Amarjeet Singh, aged about 75 years (E) Smt Surmeet Kaur, W/o Niranjan Singh Bhagat, aged about 70years All are R/o 27 Kholi Chowk, Bilaspur, P.S. Civji Lines, Tah & Distl. Bilaspur(CG) Appeai under Section 173 of the Motor_Vehtcies Act. 1988 Shri Dashrath Gupta, counse! forthe appeilant. None appears for respondent No.1 though served. , Shri M.K. Bhaduri; couTisei.forthe respondent No.2. Ms.Sangeeta Mishra.counsel for resporident Nq.3 (A)to(E). AL-S (Passedon 19-0ff-2008) During .the course of the arguments, an amicable settlement was arrived at between the parties. Iri'view of the fact that no permarient disability was caused to the claimants, liabiiity of the insurance company under the Workmen's Compensatitin Act would not arise, learned counsel::for the iegal representatives ofthe deceased/owner agreed to satisfy the award ^- @ and praved that the appeilant/insurance companv be exonerated from payment of compensation. This settlement was aiso agreed upon by Shri M.K. Bhadur!-, counse! for the respondent No.2/driver and by the learned counsel for the appeilanVinsurer. (2) in view of the submission, award dated 29/04/2006 passed by the IV* Additional Motar Accidenis Claims Tribunal (Bilaspur) in G|aims case No.104/2005 is modified to the extsnt that the appellant/insurer is exonerated from the liabitity to pay compensation to the claimants which shalt rest with the respondents/Iega! representatives ofthe deceased-owner. (3) Statutory deposit, if any, made by the insurer if not already disbursed to the claimants shali be refunded. !) With the above observation, the appeal stands disposed of^ sd':^»Amuidi Priya ^-"sr*" WM