WP(C) 1107/2002 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B K SHARMA Heard Mr. P.J. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. R. Cho kraborty, learned State counsel. The grievance raised in the writ petition is in respect of the alleged t hreatening to the petitioner to evict the petitioner from the ’Seat’ (Bheti) bea ring No. 129-B (New) corresponding to (old) No. B-III No. 50/B measuring about 4 ’ x 5’ in the municipal market, Dibrugarh. According to the petitioner he is in authorized occupation of the said Seat, but some miscreants tried to disturb him from the peaceful possession of the same. It is the further grievance of the pe titioner that in the 1st week of January, 2002 the officials of the Dibrugarh Mu nicipal Board asked the petitioner to vacate the Seat. In this connection, the p etitioner made Annexures- B and C representation to the Executive Officer, Dibru garh Municipalty and the Deputy Commissioner, Dibrugarh. However, same having yielded any result, he approached this Court by filing the instant writ petition . This Court provided interim protection to the petitioner by order dated 22.02. 02 directing the respondents not to vacate the petitioner from the possession o f the said Seat (Bheti). The respondents have not filed any counter affidavit and thus, the conte ntions raised by the petitioner go unrefuted. I dispose of the writ petition dir ecting the respondents not to vacate the petitioner without following due proced ure. Writ petition stands disposed of.