ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5141 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 5141 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 5141 OF 2007 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 2389 OF APPEAL NO. 2389 OF APPEAL NO. 2389 OF 2007 2007 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Wasim Khan for the applicant. Mr. J.J. Xavier for the respondent No.1 Mr. K.K. Kurup for respondent No.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 30th October, 2007. : 30th October, 2007. : 30th October, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The question is, on which date the basic unauthorized construction in question, made by the appellant. The appellant claiming that it was in existence prior to Sale-deed of 1992. The respondent-plaintiff, however, submitted that the said construction was made, some time in the year 2004. There is no ( 2 ) dispute about the registered Sale-deed of the year 1992. Taking all this into account, at this stage of the proceedings and considering the averments made, I am of the view that the parties to maintain status-quo till the disposal of the first appeal. 2. The civil application is disposed of, accordingly. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]