HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.18685 of 2009 Dated: 17-06-2010 Between: Margadarsi Financiers, Fatehmaidan Road, Hyderabad, rep. by Ramoji Rao & another. … Petitioners And The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home & others. … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.18685 of 2009 ORDER: In this writ petition, petitioners have questioned the orders of Government, issued in G.O.Rt.No.874 Home (Gen.B) Department, dated 01.06.2009. By the aforesaid G.O., the 3rd respondent is appointed as a Special Public Prosecutor to appear in the criminal case registered against the petitioners. The aforesaid order further states that the 3rd respondent is requested to engage the services of 2nd respondent, who is a Senior Advocate. The said G.O.Rt.No.874, dated 01.06.2009, is questioned on several grounds. When the matter is taken up, the learned Government Pleader has produced a copy of the order, dated 09.03.2010, passed by the Government in G.O.Rt.No.412 Law (LA&J-HOME-COURTS.A2) Department, whereby, a fresh appointment is made with regard to the 3rd respondent as a Special Public Prosecutor to conduct the prosecution in C.C.No.540 of 2008 on the file of the I-Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, with liberty to engage Senior Advocate as and when necessary. In view of the orders issued by the Government in G.O.Rt.No.412, dated 09.03.2010, in supercession of the orders in G.O.Rt.No.874, dated 01.06.2009, the orders in G.O.Rt.No.874 will not be in force. In that view of the matter, no cause survives to adjudicate upon the orders in G.O.Rt.No.874, dated 01.06.2009. For the aforesaid reasons, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 17th June 2010 ajr