IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31904 of 2008 RAM LAKHAN MISHRA @ RAMU S/O LATE DHANIKLAL MISHRA, R/O VILLAGE- CHAHUMA, P.O. & P.S. BAHERA, DISTRICT- DARBHANGA ……………… Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MADAN PRASAD S/O NOT KNOWN, THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BENIPUR, P.S. BAHERA, DISTRICT- DARBHANGA ……………….Opposite Parties ----------- 3. 17.01.2011 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 26.03.2007 passed by learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Benipur (Darbhanga) in Complaint Case No. 295/2006, whereby the complaint petition has been dismissed. The accusation of the petitioner is that he was suffering from cancer and he was recommended by AIMS New Delhi for better treatment for which he is required his BPL number, which was not supplied by the S.D.O., Benipur rather complainant was being assaulted. The complainant was examined and in support of the complaint, three other witnesses were also examined. The impugned order reflects that learned court below did not find any, prima facie, case. The petitioner earlier also moved this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 55022/07 challenging the impugned order which was dismissed for default. It appears unreasonable that the petitioner approached the S.D.O. rank officer for the BPL number. Moreover, the complaint petition does not contain any injury report to support the accusation somehow the other accusation does not inspire confidence, hence I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. Fahad. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. )