THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU CONTEMPT CASE No.560 OF 2010 Dated: 29-12-2010 Between: S.Ramakrishna & Others …Petitioners AND D.Kishore & another Respondents. This Court made the following: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU CONTEMPT CASE No.560 OF 2010 ORDER: This contempt case is filed complaining willful disobedience on the part of the respondents in implementing the orders of this Court made in W.P.M.P.No.3114 of 2010 in W.P.No.2346 of 2010, dated 05.02.2010 whereunder the respondents were directed to consider the case of the petitioners for appointment on contract basis under the notification, dated 26.01.2010 positively. There is no necessity of going into all the details. A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents and at para 3 it is stated as under: “3. I submit that among the writ petitioners, who are 7 in number, only third petitioner by name T.Balaraju came under the zone of consideration and therefore his case has been considered and he has been appointed in one of the 55 posts which are filled up. With regard to other petitioners, it is submitted that petitiner No.1,2,4 and 6 do not belong to the jurisdiction of vacant notified DR Depot posts and therefore, they do not satisfy the conditions laid down in the notification. The fifth petitioner has not studied upto 10th class and not even applied responding to the notification dt.26.1.2010. Therefore his case could not be considered. The 7th petitioner does not belong to ST community for whom the said notification was issued and also he does not belong to any of the notified DR Depots’ jurisdiction. Therefore the cases of writ petitioners No.1,2,4,5,6,7 have been rejected while the candidature of third petitioner has been considered favourably and appointment orders were issued in his favour.” Thus it is clear that petitioner No.3 is appointed and petitioner No.7 does not belong to S.T. community and petitioner No.5 is admittedly not having 10th class qualification and even regarding the petitioners No.1,2,4 and 6 also they do not belong to the jurisdiction of vacant notified DR Depot posts and therefore, they do not satisfy the conditions laid down under the notification. Under those circumstances, it cannot be said that the respondents have committed contempt of courts orders and therefore, they should be punished. The contempt case is devoid of merit and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed. However, this order will not preclude the petitioners from filing an additional affidavit in the writ petition enumerating the qualifications held by every petitioner. The respondents are directed to pass appropriate orders and communicate the same to the petitioners within a period of four weeks from today. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU,J DECEMBER 29, 2010 Tsr