IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.379 of 2008 Dwarika Das, son of Ramautar Das, resident of Village- Anayatpur Prabodhi alias Shambhupur Baijnath Pargana Vishara, P.O. Mani Bhakurhar, P.S. Lalganj (Sarai), District- Vaishali ---------- Petitioner(Defendant) Versus 1. Rajeshwar Das 2. Kamleshwar Das 3. Upendra Das, sons of late Ram Bahadur Das 4. Siapati Devi D/O late Ram Bahadur Das, all are resident of village- Anayat Prabodhi alias Shambhupur Baijnath Prasad Vishara P.O. Mani Makurhar, P.S. Lalganj (Sarai), District- Vaishali ---- Opposite Parties – Plaintiffs. ----------- 2. 2.8.2010 Heard Mr. Arun Kumar No.1 for the petitioner. This application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by the defendants of Title Suit No. 135 of 1983 ( Rajeshwar Das & Ors. Vrs. Dwarika Das & Ors.), whereby he challenges that part of the order dated 17.1.2008, passed by the learned Munsif II, Vaishali at Hajipur, whereby he has allowed five substitution applications after rejecting the objections raised by the defendant-petitioner. Two more amendment applications have also been allowed by the impugned order which are not the subject matter of challenge before us. 2. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. On account of death of a number of parties, the 2 plaintiffs filed five substitution applications. The defendant petitioner filed objections to all of them. Learned Munsif considered the substitution applications as well as the rejoinder of the defendant-petitioner and has allowed substitution. Learned counsel for the defendant-petitioner raises a grievance before this Court that his objections were not considered and the substitution applications have been disposed of in a most un-satisfactory manner. We do not find any error of jurisdiction in the orders passed by the learned Munsif. We are, therefore, not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. 3. It is accordingly rejected. It is a suit of 1983, and the learned trial court is directed to dispose of the same most expeditiously. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar,J. )