1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No 3051 of 2009 Jyoti v. State of Maharashtra -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr Y.S. Gorle, Adv for applicant Mr A.S. Fulzele, APP for State Coram: A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 17th August 2009 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Applicant is seeking bail in Crime No. 191/09 registered with Police Station, Sakkardara, Nagpur for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 82 of the Registration Act. 2. Applicant who is wife of main accused Tanba, claims to be holding power of attorney for Chintaman Ramteke and has executed sale deed of property in the name of her husband after the death of said Chintaman Ramteke. 3. It is apparent on perusal of the application that applicant was fully aware about the death of Chintaman Ramteke and still she executed sale deed in respect of immoveable property in the name of her husband. Knowing full well about the death of Chintaman Ramteke and consequent nullity of power of attorney, applicant has indulged into the activity of 2 executing sale deed and, therefore, no sympathy can be shown to her. No case is made out for granting anticipatory bail to the applicant. Hence, application is rejected. Learned counsel for the applicant submits at this stage that applicant will surrender tomorrow itself before the trial Court and apply for bail on merit. She may do so. No further order is necessary to be passed. Judge. hsj