CLCON No. 59 of 2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Manoj Sah, Advocate for the applicant. The main relief of the applicant in the writ petition was for the quashing of the order of the authority by which his contract of service came to an end. The writ court did not agree with the submission of the writ petitioner and did not interfere in the impugned order. However, in the operative portion a submission was made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that since the petitioner is coming back to his parent University, he should be issued a release letter and the Court accordingly directed the respondent-institution to consider such request. Since it was not complied with, the applicant has filed the present contempt application. The court finds that the opposite party has informed that the letter would be sent to the applicant by post. In view of the aforesaid, no case of willful disobedience of the order of the court is made out. The contempt application is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 29.03.2011 Shiv