BILASPUR {cal WP. (S)No. 6’ (f £7 2007 Eunita Sahu aged 20 years Wife ofDasrath Sahu. Petitioner Resident of village Lawatara, Tahsil Berla District Durg (C.G.) Versus The State Government of Chhattishgarh, /’ Through the Secretary, Respondent ... ...1. Mahila, Bal Vikash Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) “£9 (gig 2, Collector, Durg, In-charge Mahila Bal Vikash 2 Ty rd, \dc’j _/’ Q‘gibhagDurg . a $ O, $‘X3‘3 /.. PariYJ o‘ana Adhikar r 7 W Ekikrit Vikash Pariyoj ana, Berla /4. Gram Panchayat Lavatara, through the Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Lavatara, Block and Tahsil Berla, District Durg(C.G.) /5 Smt. Bisakha aged 22 years wife ofPurendar, Resident of village Lavatara Tahsil BerlaiDistrict Durg (C.G.) : t & f §4IQH COUR? OF §U3ICAWRE CHHATTISé‘ARI—i: 3ILA$PUR Simgée Bench: Hm‘bie Shri $a1'ish K. AgFaihMr‘i, J‘ W. ?. (s) No} 694 OF 260? Present Shri Somkcm’: Vermai counsei for fine pafifioner’. Sm‘r. Anju Ahuja, Depuw Governmem Advocafe fer‘ the respondanfs No. 1 f0 3/51‘cd'e $ R D E § (?assed on Th déy of February, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for f’na pa‘ri‘rionerz submifs ‘?hm‘ The pai‘ifioner belongs ‘ro The famiiy below ‘rhe pover‘ry iine, when “the r-e3poman? No. 5* has been appoim'ed, conwm‘y fa. Aanganwad§ Scheme and kw as she be¥éngs fa fhe family living above The pover‘fy line. Therefore, ‘i'he preference eug’n‘r ‘lo have been given To fhe pe‘ii'iioner and no? *ro a‘he respsndem‘ Na 5 Accordingly, i‘ne 6ollecfor’ burg is iiirec'i'ed ia look inio ‘l’l’le allegajrien cf 'ihe peli‘lioner and pass appropriafe arder in accerdance wi'i'n Aangunwadi Scheme and law. Th8 WM? Willie?! is accordiwly diSposed cf. No arder as ’m Sd/- Satish K. Agninotri l Judge cosis. Sabiu Pei'i‘mner i suni‘m Sahu Versus Qesponden‘m : The Sim‘e Governmen? of Chha‘msgarh <3: nfhar's