1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.394 OF 2009 Arjunrao S/o Bhagwanrao Ghogare .... PETITIONER V E R S U Prabhakar S/o Dattatraya Ghogare & Others .... RESPONDENTS Shri. Arun Naik, Advocate holding for Shri. R.V.Ghogare, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri. Deelip Bankar Patil, A.P.P. for State. [ CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. ] DATE : 08/06/2009 ------------------------------------------ PER COURT : 1. Heard Shri. Arun Naik, counsel appearing for Petitioner. It is stated that the complaint is presented by the petitioner to the Magistrate making allegations against the accused in respect of commission of offence punishable U/s 406 and 420 of Indian Penal Code. The learned Magistrate after recording verification statement of the complainant, 2 directed investigation by police U/s 156 of Code of Criminal Procedure in view of order passed on 7/10/2008. The accused approached the Court of Sessions, Osmanabad by filing Criminal Revision No. 151 of 2008 raising challenge to the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate. The learned Sessions Judge, Osmanabad while entertaining the Revision Application, has directed stay of investigation by police. The petitioner is aggrieved by the interlocutory order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Osmanabad in pending revision application. 2. Heard Shri. Naik. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate to direct the revisional Court to decide the Revision Application on its own merit expeditiously. The learned Sessions Judge is, therefore, directed to decide the Criminal Revision No. 151 of 2008 as expeditiously as possible, preferably before the end of August, 2009. No interference is called for in this Writ Petition. The Writ Petition thus stands disposed of with aforesaid directions. [ R.M.BORDE ] JUDGE knp/CRIWP394.09