1 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.738/2010. Nand Lal Jangid & Ors. VS State of Raj. & Ors. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.738/2010. Nand Lal Jangid and Others. VERSUS State of Rajasthan and Others. 30.04.2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, for the petitioners. Mr.Sanjay Pareek, for the respondent-State. ***** Matter has come up on the application No.19954 dated 28.04.2010 submitted by the petitioners for placing on record the judgment in the case of Tilak Raj and Others [S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.15296/2009] decided on 23.03.2010 by the learned Single Judge of this court. I find from the record and which fact is not disputed that when the writ petition came up for hearing before this court on 17.02.2010, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that this writ petition is identical to Tilak Raj's case (surpa) and it had then been prayed that the interim order as was passed on 11.02.2010 may be passed in the present writ petition also. Accordingly, an order came to be passed on 17.02.2010 on the basis of the aforesaid submissions before this court maintaining parity with Tilak Raj's case. Since Tilak Raj's case is already decided by the 2 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.738/2010. Nand Lal Jangid & Ors. VS State of Raj. & Ors. learned Single Judge and while deciding the writ petition following directions have come to be passed, I deem it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition with the identical directions as have been given in Tilak Raj's case:- “In view of the aforesaid, petitioners' claim to continue on the deputation cannot be accepted. The petitioners were not selected and appointed on regular basis on the post of Divisional Accountant. Their selection and appointment is on deputation. As per Rules, maximum period of deputation is five years though in the order of appointment of the petitioners, period of deputation has been shown to be of three years. Since Rules provide maximum period of deputation is to be of five years, thus beyond a period of five years, petitioners have no right to continue on the post. In view of aforesaid, writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:- (a) The petitioners were appointed on deputation for a period of 3 years and rules stipulate maximum period of deputation to be of 5 years, thus petitioners cannot claim a right to continue on the post pursuant to the order of appointment on deputation. (b) Those who are appointed by the Comptroller & Auditor General of India on regular basis, their service condition would not be affected pursuant to the notification dated 20th of February, 2004 till the matters are finally decided by the Tribunal and High Court. Direction in this para will include not only those who are litigants before the Tribunal and High Court but all those regularly appointed in the cadre by the Comptroller & Auditor General of India and are working in State of Rajasthan till the final outcome of pending writ petition/original application. This will take 3 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.738/2010. Nand Lal Jangid & Ors. VS State of Raj. & Ors. safeguard of interim order passed in favour of regular appointees by the Government of India. (c) Excluding the number of posts occupied by regularly appointees by the Government of India remaining posts can be filled up by the State Government pursuant to the notification dated 20th of February, 2004 and till such posts are filled up, arrangement as provided in the notification dated 20th of February, 2004 would be given effect to. It would be only for intervening period till notification is actually implemented. The regular arrangement by the State Government would however be carried out at the earliest and within the time frame. (d) The cadre would be controlled by the respective authorities as indicated above till the original application/writ petition filed by the regular appointees of the Central Government are decided.” In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition stands disposed of in the light of the aforesaid directions given by this court in the case of Tilak Raj's and Others. The application No.19954 dated 28.04.2010 submitted by the petitioner also stands disposed of. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.