CWP(T) No. 6699 of 2008 02.11.2010 Present: Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Asstt. A.G. for respondent No. 2. From the impugned order dated 8.6.1999 (Annexure A- 1) it is evident that no notice was ever issued to petitioner or opportunity of hearing afforded to him. In terms of the impugned order petitioner’s pay was refixed on the lower side. This entails civil consequences. As such on this short ground alone the impugned order (Annexure A-1) is quashed. 2. Petitioner retired in the year 1999 itself. It is open for the respondent/authorities to pursue with the action, if they so desire, in accordance with law. While taking such decision the respondents shall take into account Annexures A-3, A-4 and A-8. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. November 2, 2010 (PK)