IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 2nd day of November, 2011 1st Bail Application No.960 of 2011 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Gulsher S/o Sri Sharafat R/o Vill Margoobpur Bahadrabad Distt. HDR U.K. ………Applicant Versus tate of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party S Arising out of Case Crime No. 88 of 2011 Under Section 302, 201, 20-B I.P.C., Police Station- Bahadrabad, District Hardwar. 1 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder, present for the State. Heard. Applicant Gulsher, who is in jail in connection with Crime No. 88 of 2011, relating to offences punishable under Section 302,201,120-B of I.P.C., Police Station- Bahadrabad, District Hardwar, has sought his release on bail. It is a case of circumstantial evidence. Applicant is not named in the First Information Report. Only evidence collected against the applicant appears to be that of “last seen” with the deceased. Postmortem examination report shows that cause of death could not be ascertained. 2 Learned counsel for the State pointed out that there is recovery of motorcycle and mobile of the deceased from the applicant. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Gulsher, be released on bail, on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 02.11.2011 JM