1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7 OF 2010 AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8 OF 2010 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Shri Chandrakant N. Chavan for the Petitioner. -- CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : 8TH JANUARY, 2010 P.C.: Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, who is Original 2nd Plaintiff. By the orders impugned, the Courts below have declined to exhibit the documents produced by the Petitioner. The impugned orders are purely interlocutory in nature, and therefore, at this stage, in a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, no interference is called for. Notwithstanding the impugned orders, the Petitioner can always lead further evidence to prove the documents. 2 2. The orders impugned are capable of being challenged in Appeal which may be preferred by the Petitioner against the decree passed in the suit if the same be adversed to him. 3. Subject to what is observed above, no interference is called for. The Writ Petitions accordingly are dismissed. JUDGE