CWP No.2443/2008. 21.11.2008 Present: Mr Nimish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr R.K.Bawa, Advocate General with Mr.J.K.Verma, Dy.A.G. for respondent No.4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this is a public interest litigation. We do not find any averment in the petition to the extent that neither it is public interest litigation nor writ petition in the representative capacity. The petitioner is neighbour of opposite party No.3, who, according to the petitioner, has constructed some house though she has permission for repairs only. We are of the considered opinion that this litigation is purely between two neighbours, therefore, the petitioner has remedy before the civil Court. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. ( Jagdish Bhalla ), C.J. November 21, 2008. ( Kuldip Singh ), J. (soni)