BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fourteenth day of July Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.8157 of 2011 1 M.S.PONRAJ 2 VEERA CHINNAMMAL 3 RAJESH KANNAN ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2,3 & 4 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. CR.NO. 6/2011. ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S. S.PALANIVELAYUTHAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR,Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 120(b) r/w 406, 420, 498(A) of IPC and also Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.6 of 2011, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners were charged under Sections 120(b) r/w 406, 420, 498(A) of IPC and also Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He submitted that the petitioners are the in-laws of the de-facto complainant. On a complaint given by the de facto complainant, the husband of the de facto complainant was arrested and enlarged on bail. He further submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) would submit that the investigation is pending and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the petitioners are in-laws of the de facto complainant and also considering the fact that the husband of the de https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ facto complainant was arrested and enlarged on bail, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar, and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the *1st & 3rd petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The 2nd petitioner is a cancer patient. She shall appear before the Court concerned on receipt of summons. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 14/07/2011 *(Corrected order issued) / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO (Already despatched) 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, VIRUDHUNAGAR. 2. -Do-Thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. S.PALANIVELAYUTHAM Advocate SR.No.23059 akm/15.07.11 /2p-6c/ SR : 26.07.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.8157 of 2011 Date :14/07/2011 21/07/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/