IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3428 of 2009 PRABHASH KUMAR son of Late Bal Govind Prasad Chaudhary, resident of Mohalla- Dhaja Gali, P.O. + P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur, at present posted as Clerk, Assistant Registrat, Co- operative Society, Katihar. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 27.03.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned J.C. to Incharge Spl.P.P. (Vigilance) The offence alleged is under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 477, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, section 13(ii) and 13(i)(d) of the Prevention of corruption Act and section 10 of the Examination Act. It is alleged that during examination for appointment on the post of Deputy Collector the petitioner had erased the answers more than fifty times. It is further alleged that the petitioner had adopted unfair means in getting him selected. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in the aforesaid large number of persons were made accused and out of them several persons have been allowed anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the Vigilance submits that in case the petitioner is allowed bail, he must remain present on each and every date fixed in the trial. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a - 2 - period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Ist, Patna in connection with Vigilance Case No. 19 of 2005 (Special Case No. 30 of 2005 ) subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is, however, made clear that the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date fixed in the case save and except for any cogent reason. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)