IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 6157 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 28th April, 2010. Balwinder Kaur Petitioner through Mr. A.K.Walia, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Mrs. Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG, Punjab Mr. Gaurav Singla, Advocate, for respondent No.4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner seeks quashing of the letter dated 17.03.2010 [Annexure P-3] whereby recovery of Rs.1,65,815/- on account of the alleged wrong payment of dearness relief on the family pension paid to the petitioner, is sought to be made. The petitioner's husband - Gurdeep Singh, who was employed as Head Constable in the Punjab Police, died in harness on 11.12.1995 in a road accident and as a consequence thereto, the petitioner was granted family pension. Later on, her son – Gurdeep Singh was given appointment on compassionate grounds on 25th October, 2001. Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by a decision of this Court in CWP No. 1961 of 2010 [Manjit Kaur v State of Punjab & Ors.] decided on 27 th April, 2010. For the reasons mentioned in Manjit Kaur's case [supra], this writ petition is allowed in the same terms. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. April 28, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE