IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33032 of 2009 RAVI CHAKRAVARTI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.9.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, for the State and also for the informant. The petitioner is in custody in a Police case under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 354/34 of the Penal Code. The submission is that there is a case and counter case for the occurrence of the same date. The assault attributed to the petitioner has caused only simple injury making Section 307 inapplicable. Learned counsel for the informant submits that he has filed an affidavit on 15.9.2009 making disclosures with regard to the petitioner. The same was not available on record and therefore the Court requested the counsel for the informant to make available his copy for perusal by the Court so as to not hold up the proceedings. It is submitted that the petitioner has an antecedent of one more case. The injury caused by the petitioner has resulted in prolonged treatment but not requiring hospitalization. Unfortunately, no such latter statement has been made in the affidavit as was sought to be made at the Bar. Let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 2 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Civil Line P.S. Case No. 199/2009. Let the office put on record the copy of the affidavit stated to have been filed on behalf of the informant on 15.9.2009. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)