- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2895/2009 Dnyan Vikas Shikshan Sanstha (Bk.) & another. ...Petitioners.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents... ..... Shri V.P. Kadam, Advocate for petitioners. Shri K.B. Choudhary, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 4. Shri V.S. Panpatte, Advocate for respondent no.5. ..... CORAM: V.C.DAGA & A.V. POTDAR,JJ. DATE: 14.07.2009 PER COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. This Court, vide its order dated 26.7.2005 passed in Writ Petition No. 4413/2003, had directed the Director of Education to scrutinise the proposal - 2 - of the petitioners within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order. A complaint is being made that the said proposal was not considered within the said period of three months. Needless to mention that the three months expired in the month of October, 2005. It was expected on the part of the petitioners to move this Court immediately to make grievance about non-implementation of the order passed by this Court. The petitioners are practically approaching this Court after expiry of four years. Considering the laches and delay in the matter, which is unexplained, we do not see any reason to entertain this petition. The petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. However, dismissal of this petition shall not come in the way of the petitioners if the petitioners want to make a fresh proposal to the State Government and if it is so made, the same may be considered on its own merits. (A.V. Potdar,J.) (V.C. Daga, J.) ndk/c147093