IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 127 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3915 OF 2003 M/s.Nilesh Constructions. ... Petitioner. V/s. Rupee Co-operative Bank Ltd. & ors. ... Respondents. AND REVIEW PETITION NO. 128 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3918 OF 2003 Mehta Associates. ... Petitioner. V/s. Rupee Co-operative Bank Ltd. & ors. ... Respondents. None for the review petitioners. Kishor V. Tembe for respondent No.1. C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.2 to 4. CORAM : V.C.DAGA and MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 8th October 2009. P.C. : None for the review petitioner. Heard learned counsel for respondent No.1 and learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos.2 to 4. 2. Both review petitions are delayed. Civil applications for condonation of delay are not filed. However, prayer for condonation is made. Learned counsel for the respondent have no objection for condonation of delay. Accordingly, delay in filing review petitions is condoned. 3. Mr.Tembe brought to the notice of this Court that revision petitions raising identical grounds based on identical facts were already heard and disposed of by this Court vide order dated 12th June, 2009. He submits that these two review petitions could not be place on board with other petitions for want of removal of objections. Consequently, these two petitions are placed in today s board for hearing and necessary orders. 4. As already mentioned herein, nobody appears for the review petitioner. No useful purpose would be served by dismissing these petitions in default. It, ultimately results in moving restoration application, which is normally granted. This creates strain on the registry. Hence we went through the review petitions with the assistance of the advocates appearing for the respondents. They have taken us through the review petitions as well as order dated 12th June, 2009. Having gone through the same, we do not find any material to take a different view other than the view taken in the order dated 12th June, 2009 while disposing of Civil Application No.1303/2009 (Vijaykumar Devraj Mehra v. Rupee Co-op. Bank Ltd. & Ors.) and other companion application. 5. No case is made out for review. Both review petitions are dismissed with no order as to costs. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)