IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43490 of 2009 GANESH MAHTON Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 7.12.2009 Heard. The case is under Section 366A etc IPC. No denying the fact that the petitioner is not the person who is said to have taken or enticed her away. The submission is, to a larger extent, it is not controverted that the lady had herself run away from her parent’s house with one Dhiraj Sada and was living with him in Delhi after having married him. She had also filed a case as per the contention against her parents for threatening and other acts. It is contended that the petitioner is a resident of a different village and is indirectly related to the above noted Dhiraj Sada. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Mansoorchak P.S.Case No.10 of 2008. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )