IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN MONDAY, THE 8TH MARCH 2010 / 17TH PHALGUNA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 4353 of 2007() ------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 27/09/2007 IN CRMP.1922/07 IN CC.765/2003 of CHIEF JUDL.MAGISTRATE COURT, ERNAKULAM .................... REVN. PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS/ACCUSED ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. T.P. MURALEEDHARAN, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O. NARAYANA MENON, PUSHPANJALI, L.M.PAILEE ROAD, VYTTILA, KOCHI, POONITHURA VILLAGE. 2. G. SUKUMARI, AGED 49 YEARS, W/O.T.P.MURALEEDHARAN, PUSHPANJALI, L.M.PAILEE ROAD, VYTTILA, KOCHI, POONITHURA VILLAGE. BY ADV. MR.TOM JOSE, SMT.GEETHA JOB (OZHUKAYIL), SMT.J.SHEEBA. RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ASST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. ERIC THOMAS, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O. P.T.THOMAS, PERMANENT RESIDENT AT PALLATHU KIZHAKETHIL KODUKULANJI P.O., CHENGANNOOR TALUK, PRESENTLY EMPLOYED AT KUWAIT AT SALMIYA 22049, P.B.NO.4954, KUWAIT, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, 1.CHERIYAN, AGED 53 YEARS, KURUMTHOTTATHIL, THUMPAMON THAZHAM MURI, MEZHUVELI, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.I.V. PRAMOD. R2 BY ADV. MR.K.V.SADANANDA PRABHU. THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/03/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs. P.S.GOPINATHAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl,R.P.No.4353 of 2007. = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 8th day of March, 2010. O R D E R No representation for the revision petitioners. Adv.Sri.K.V.Sadananda Prabhu, the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent/defacto complainant, submitted that the matter has been settled out of Court and in the civil court, a compromise petition was filed. The 2nd respondent had also filed a memo to that effect before the trial court. The offence alleged in this case is under Section 406 and 420 IPC and that the offences are compoundable. In the above circumstance, recording the above submission made by the 2nd respondent, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a compounding petition before the trial court. P.S.Gopinathan (Judge) Kvs/-