IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24304 of 2010 1. SUJEET KUMAR 2. AJEET KUMAR ---------------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 4.8.2010 Learned counsel submits that petitioner no.1 is said to be 14 years old, a juvenile. So his anticipatory bail is not maintainable. He is advised to get his age assessed by the court where the case is pending including the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in Piar (Hatha O.P.) P.S. Case No. 2/10 and thereafter pray for proper relief from the Juvenile Justice Board. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner no.2 and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that assault caused by unknown criminals was found fatal only but I find no substance in the submission. All the named accused persons including these petitioners and one Santlal Mahto, his wife and their father are alleged for causing assault by means of Lathi Danda while Santlal Mahto by means of Farsa. All named accused persons not of unknown to any one came, entered in the informant’s house in the 2 night while they were sleeping, brutally assaulted informant’s mother and sisters and on account of assault, mother of the informant died. So I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)