HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH & HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Dated 5-5-2010 W.A.NO.352 OF 2010 Between: M/s. NITCO Roadways Pvt. Plot No.13, Co-Operative Industrial Estate, Phase-II, Gandhi Nagar, Hyderabad, represented by its Director Sri Rajan Nanda son of Satpal Nanda. …Appellant. And: Union of India, represented by its General Manager, South Central Railway, Rail Nilayam, Secunderabad and others. …Respondents. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH & HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI W.A.NO.352 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) This Writ Appeal has been filed against the order dated 22- 4-2010 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in W.P.M.P.No.11796 of 2010 in W.P.No.9134 of 2010. The Appellant herein is the writ petitioner. Heard. The appellant filed the Writ Petition No.9134 of 2010 questioning the issuance of tender notifications dated 9-4- 2010 and 14-12-2009 for leasing of parcel vans for transportation of parcels for a future period of two years in train Nos.2707 & 2708 i.e., Secunderabad-H Nizamuddin-Secuderabad and to direct the respondents to consider his representation dated 19-11-2009 to renew the lease period for further period of 2 years. Pending disposal of the Writ Petition, the Petitioner sought for a direction to the respondents to consider his representation dated 19-11-2009. The learned Single Judge by impugned order did not direct the respondents to consider his representation for renewal of lease period on the ground that the respondents have refused to extend the petitioner’s lease and issued a tender notification. However, the petitioner was permitted to continue in the lease till the tenders are finalized and contract is entrusted to the successful tenderer. He was also further permitted to participate in the fresh tenders subject to the result of the writ petition. It was also made clear that the petitioner shall pay the freight charges as per the agreement. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that the said order is a reasoned order and we are not inclined to interfere with the same. Unless, the petitioner succeeds in the main Writ Petition and the Tender notification is set aside, he is not entitled for the interim relief of extension of his lease. However, the finalization of the tenders will be subject to the result of the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Post the Writ Petition itself for “Final Hearing” immediately after Summer Vacation, 2010. _________________ V. ESWARAIAH, J _________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J Date: 05-05-2010 Dvs HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH & HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI W.A.NO.352 OF 2010 Dated 5-5-2010