1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3538 OF 2005 IN APPEAL (LODGING) NO.554 OF 2005 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.239 OF 2003 PEC Ltd. Appellants vs. Curzon Maritime Ltd. Respondents Mr.S.P.Srivastava i/b.M/s.Consulta Juris for the applicants. Mr.Prashant Pratap for the respondents. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 25th November 2005 P.C. Heard. 2. The appeal suffers from delay of 34 days. 3. Taking overall facts and circumstances of the case, we find that the delay of 34 days was neither wilful nor deliberate on the part of the appellants. 4. We are, therefore, satisfied that sufficient cause for condonation of delay is made out. 5. We, accordingly, condone the delay in filing the 2 appeal. 6. Office is directed to process the appeal and post it for admission. 7. Notice of motion stands disposed of. (R.M.LODHA, (R.M.LODHA, (R.M.LODHA, J.) J.) J.) (D. (D. (D. G. KARNIK, J.) G. KARNIK, J.) G. KARNIK, J.)