^^tf*;:! ^- ,.„ - •;. • st:^^§'^i^^^fc::' & r~'. ^^l^aZ— IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AJ: BILASPUR Writ Petition (S)NO. l ^^J_12001 PETITIONER ^y ^•^;-" ..-•fe'^/v-"' ^y^ •»-"^" .•' -^y ^AMESH KUIUIAR MADHARIYA aged about 34 years, S/o Shri Rup Singh Madariya R/o Village Dhaba, P.0. Bhedsar, Thana Pulgaon, Distt.-Durg ( C.G.) V^RSUS RESPONDENTS :1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Panchayat & Village Development Department, Dau •^^/? ,, . n. .„, ^, y^( Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Ministrial )J s/- ^ Raipur (C.G.) ,-';' 2^ Chief Exective Officer District Panchayal Durg (C.G.) '3. Collector, Durg (C.G.) WRM PETITION U/A 226/2?f OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPLR S.B. ;x??- (LE MR SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. ,^.< Petitioner WMT PETITION (S.) N01231 of2007. Ramesh Kumar Madhariya. versus State ofChhattisKarh & Present : Shri D.R.Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ku. Anita Siagh Advocate fer tae petiti the respondents /State. ORDER (Passed on lst ofMarch, 2007) 1. Tbe petitioner was working as Shiksfaa Karmi Grade III in Govemmeat Giris Pre-Middle School Nagpura, who bas beea promoted to the post of Shiksha Kanai Grade II, aad on promotion he has been transferred and posted to Pre-Middle Scfaool K-hamariya, Patan in tiie same District, 2. The petitioner has impugn.ed the transfer on promotion, on the ^round that as per the policy ofthe State Govemment, husband and wife be posted at one place, as far as possible. ..——.._, 3. I have gone through the policy and the records appended to the petition. It is clear, that firstiy, this is not acase oftransfer simplicitor. It is a case of promotion and the petitioner has beea posted on promotion to different school. Ifthe petitioner is not willing to joia at the new place of transfer, he may forego his promotion. For that tne petitioner is not ready. So far as posting of husband and wife at one place is conceraed, it is applicable in normal transfer cases and that too; as far as possible. Tfae sa.me is not mandatory. It is to be decided in publis interest by the 4. For the reasons steted hereiaabove, the petition is devoid of merit, which desen'es to be and is i, summanly. Sd/- . ,, ^^r°m