IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.14420 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 Smt. Maina Wanti …PETITIONER VERSUS Municipal Corporation, Panchkula and others …RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR --- PRESENT: Mr. P.S. Hundal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Premjit Singh Hundal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Partap Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1. None for respondents No.2 and 3. … SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner has filed the instant petition against the show cause notice dated 29.3.2007 (Annexure P-2), whereby she has been ordered to remove the unauthorised possession of the Corporation land within seven days. It is admitted position that the above-said show cause notice was issued after the decision of the Civil Court, whereby in the suit filed by the petitioner for permanent injunction it has been ordered that the petitioner will not be evicted from the suit land, except in due course of law. After the said order, respondent-Corporation started the proceedings for evicting the petitioner in due course of law, and consequently has issued show cause notice to her. C.W.P. No.14420 of 2010 -2- In view of the above facts, we are not inclined to entertain this petition only against the show cause notice as the petitioner has remedy to reply to the show cause notice. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to reply to the show cause notice. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE September 20, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) vkg JUDGE