IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 685 OF 2006 Savita Bharat Kattimani ... .... Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors.... ..... Respondents. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Office Notes, Office ) Court's or Judge's Orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances ) Court's orders or directions and ) Registrar's orders. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Mrs.H.K.Mandlik, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.R.D.Rane, Govt. Pleader for Respondents. CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND V.R.KINGAONKAR, JJ. 27.2.2006. PC: By this petition the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Caste Scrutiny Committee. The Committee has on careful consideration of the evidence available on record come to the conclusion that 1 the petitioner has failed to prove that she belongs to Mahadeo Koli tribe. Cogent reasons have been given explaining certain entries as Mahadeo Koli which can mean both Mahadeo Koli or Maratha Koli. Then the fact that the applicant is not aware of traits, characteristics and customs of Mahadeo Koli schedule tribe is noted. Then it is found on consideration of these aspects that the petitioner has failed to establish herself as person belonging to Mahadeo Koli tribe. The jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution is limited. Interference is possible only where the findings are perverse or based on no evidence. In the present case adequate evidence as available and was scrutinized by the Tribunal. Merely because different conclusion can be drawn, it is not possible to interfere in writ jurisdiction. Hence petition dismissed. 2 27.2.06 3