IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4156 of 2010 1. VISHWANATH SAHANI 2. DHARMENDRA KUMAR 3. MUKHA SAHANI -------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 4.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that complainant himself withdrawn to marry elder son who is yet unmarried and making justification of pressure to marry another son. According to learned counsel, the son who was to be married is not mentally developed, so after engagement it was decided to marry second son which was really denied. Now complainant’s daughter is married and petitioners are apprehending their arrest which cannot be justified. I agree with the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten 2 thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in Trial no. 401 of 2009 arising out of Complaint Case No. 1014 of 2006, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)