IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17601 of 2010 1. JAGTARNI DEVI W/O NARAYAN SAH, D/O SHIV SHANKAR SAH @ KANIK SAH R/O VILL.- PITAUNJHIA, P.S.- PASRAHA, DISTT.- KHAGARIA Versus 1. NARAYAN SAH S/O SARYUG SAH R/O VILL.- PITAUNJHIA, P.S.- PASRASHA, DISTT.- KHAGARIA, NOW WORKING AS CHAUKIDAR KOSI PROJECT VEERPUR, DISTT.- SUPAUL AND RESIDING AT VILL.- KONTAHA, P.O.- BHIM NAGAR, P.S.- VEERPUR, DISTT.- SUPAUL 2. GEETA DEVI D/O JAGARNATH SAH P.O. AND P.S.- VEERPUR, DISTT.- SUPAUL 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KOSHI PROJECT VEERPUR, DISTT.- SUPAUL ----------- 4. 21.04.2011 The report at Flag ‘A’ has been perused. There is no indication in the report of any modification, variation or setting aside of the judgment and decree in Title Suit No. 4 of 1996. There appears no justifiable reason for pendency of Execution case for such long years. If the orders of the executing Court are not being complied with by any Government department, the executing Court is required to exercise its powers in accordance with law to ensure compliance. Writing of letters to Government authorities by the Court with regard to a judicial proceeding is not an appropriate method to deal with the issue. Let the Execution case be brought to its logical conclusion without further delay 2 within a maximum period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)