IGH COURT OF THE CHHA’ SGARH A BILASP P CNo 7351 or201 H T UR ~ ._ i ‘ pTmONERs E 1 bout ansukh 51 years Sau Bu Ram Sahu ae njmala: Sahu vy/o Mansukh Sahu age bout45 years Ff/o Village Balhar Bloc Arang, Tahsu Aran DI’strlct — Ralpur “- g ' Versus ‘ ‘ L RESPONbENTSl T Thh The he State of Phhattlsgarh roug ecretary. Revenue Department D hawan Mantralaa Ralur(CG Rpu‘ al A I Th r ur D— e”. Collecto Ralp lstrlct ‘ram S/oMakhan Sahu (C anthlrlal S/o haltu Sahu aed about 6 araya Prasad Sahu So ate ana alSahu aged about 30 year ‘ ‘ Blshesar Yadav S/o Late Kanhala y La l hiv :Kumar Sahu S/o Lae amcar ged about 52 year m=iSahu S/o Late Sukhla ah _a l Su ‘ ‘ - ' ‘ ‘ W () o ‘ "a M h S ( o lsar ‘ gd‘ . N d ’ ' : a k’ ‘_ ‘ V : > 'aS KS B y p) ‘2 > a G) , M C g 2 I ’ N / L Mhra V \ L s «S t Rhan a s ' M A y WC) 751 2010 .P.( No. 3 of E 1..210 UNIL, KUMAR SINHA, eard on admlssm he etltloners are aggneved w1 e order dated 6 1 2 passe Revenue Case No 07 A/74 year 10-201 by the Aonal Tesllda ran 1Tehsul Arang, District Rarpur The Impugn s as uner i ‘ "0 1,; WW I’ wmwwfw! 6/12/201 a mwmwaa 51% mammmmrws lwgfhor $mmwemon§%wm: $w$m€m§as$wzrmw WW$W12s% IWW§EI wsm$mwms§ws$ww mswwmwwemwww Wmmwmw®nés HWIW W7/12/1ow3oowsrw wwmwmafssmwmw a % arisawam ‘ r C erma learned counsel appearing on bealf of the petrtroners, ubmrts that the concerned Additional Tehsrldar has passed the Impugned rder‘Wltlhout affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioners He submits hat the notice in this matter was firstly issued by the Panchayat Thereafte h matter was put up before the concerned Tehslldar and the petitioners and the ersons appeared before the Tehslldar the Tehsudar passed the order irectly He submits that even the order is taken to be u/s 248 of the P (C G) Land Revenue Code a reasonable opportunity of hearing was reuired to be given by the said authority to the petitioners ” ‘ 7 Mr M P S Bhatia learned Dy. Gov ocate appearing on behalf‘ he tate/respondents 1 to 3 ar t again the said order passed by the: ehsildar there is statutory remediavai able to, he petitioners The petitioner a have itated the said order efore the Appellate/Rewsronal Authorit 2 ORALORDR \ . (3129) ‘ S J ‘ H n 1 gT p th th 2 010 d in‘ 201 ddm hr Ag ed order read d - . Wméhifha 272WE 9 w§ W$ Wme Ww W m§ w: WE ._ xg I ; {- i \ i _ , ‘ Wwm{ wg Wm 1 Mé S V h § s ? o : t r ‘t ‘i. o i g: ‘ d , t M } q g I t, Ev o y t S g V, a a T y s r my ag b yvjo I i .;() o‘. 5 O ‘ \ he ma have filed an obection u/s 32 of te Lan evenue oe eore hllar Itself but Without domg all this the petitioners ave rused to thi tiv of the effucaCIous alternae p d he amsron sae Isel t M r i e statutory remedies under the Land’; ty y j h d R Cd bf the ~ Tesd h h s ourt y lllng this wnt etition Therefore In v1e C b f p remed'les avarlable to the etltloners the petl Ion may be dlsmlsse at t dls tg tf r Vema In vrew of the prelimnary objection taken by th Staten, Cel also agrees that there Va ouns evnu a y g police force He shows ther ncerned Additional ehSIIti r Tar In this regad He sub a‘$atutory remedy but for the tlme belng some protectlon may be granted r vall,st , o thait uch a V l i {After passmg the aforesaid order on 6 010 the concerned authority a a ‘ s the petltroners may not be thrown out from the portions of their land my s manner which Is arbitrary and illegal ? have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and have also' eruse ‘1. WWI L Vawia FITaWWEIW/iz/ioatwwoavtmw d15/12/201oaw‘iizooadilé‘rittmwé ,vmmmmwmmwmm "Wmsgaimmmmimtiwa imbbwwwmmmww a-Eviittstimtiltrléiaétwaiohoaoaimwgw ‘mimmamwwww hat on 15 12 2019 the possesSIon of the petitioners would be removed Wit he hel of the police force In the above facts and Circumstances of the case ous statutory remed gainst the order dated 6 12 2010 i deem it appropriate to isposed of't n i View of the fact that there 3 WPC N 731 f2010 r Ree Code 1959 and the petltloners are ready to avall those remedies f er he submits that even Without gr ntrng brethlng time to the; .order for removal of the possessron E Howev t jrthat the petitioners may be permitted toi pd the records of the writ petition , i g h pssed an order dated 10 12 2010 which rea/s as under — ~ “10/12/2010 i l l i l W - am i w. d w'r t Wwi t h ‘ t p : A i y; ad n ,, a d his .P.‘C) o. of w( N 7151 2010 petltlon at thlsis ge With Ilerty gamst the orde ated 6 12 20 vallable i to them under the Land Reven n other remedy wuthln ‘a ue ay af d also b free o ra or Ineri i i d d d by th Nb dated 10 122010 shall, h t tt td fly‘ dp f ' n rits: on: me .‘ b t, V -’ - . i ‘ i vL ‘ i 7 e ree to avail te remed irected that In the meanwhlle the orers passe e al 1' 2010 as also order 'ITear hSIId emain stayed for a perio ne month from toda r d o y With the aforesald observations/durectlons te wri peiion sans nal isosed o, rder dat o ed Sd/— Sunil Kuniar Sinha Judge 4 > ,a 1 r f h y ‘I e t py f tm. ‘