IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 25770 of 2001 Between: 1 Vanam Ramadas S/o.Jagannadharao Panchayat Raj Department, R/o.Mamillagudem, Khammam. 2 Vanam Rajani Devi W/o.Sri Ramadas R/o. Mamillagude, Khammam. 3 Vanam Venkata Ranganadha Rao S/o. Ramadas R/o.Mamillagudem, Khammam. 4 Vanam Venkata Ramana S/o. Ramadas R/o.Mamillagudem Khammam. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue (Endowments-II) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Boggulakunta, Hyderabad. 3 The Regional Joint Commissioner, Endowments Department, M.Z.III, Boggulakunta, Hyderabad. 4 The Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department, Khammam. 5 Smt.K.Saroja Devi W/o.Sri Seetha Ramarao Near Vivekananda School, Mamillagudem, Khammam. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.M.RAM KUMAR FOR MR.T.S.ANAND Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25770 of 2001 ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for a Writ of Mandamus or other appropriate writ or order with the following substantive relief:- “to declare the order of the 1st respondent in Memo No.31160/Endowment/II(2)/2001-3, dated 12.11.2001 as void, without jurisdiction and opposed to Constitutional guarantees envisaged under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution of India, the principles of natural justice and fair play, and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners’ right to enjoy their residential house as they like and pass such other orders as may be deemed fit in the circumstances of the case.” At the hearing, Sri M.Ram Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri T.S.Anand, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.32619 of 2001 is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 15.10.2008 v v