SS^^S^sSSS S^V Vf R-li* 'tT'Sff 3?T^?T %'^t^ 'f°=i.'*ii<<iwt(, si'nl'tt're, fawry^ »f»*wila»*tt«(»' sn^ff <CT!w^(lyi^«i<p) TOITW^fcTSiI^? WlKsHNU. b2/B'Ul< 2U08- Petltioner Bh^w^n Singh Sahu, S/o Late Shri Padum. Rain S^ihu, Aged about 62 ycara, retired as Field Assjst^nt, Water Resources Department, Sub Divisic^. Narayaapiir, District Narayaapur, R/o ViUagc[ Ss Post Kot-tara Tahsil Charama Distt Kaiiket- (CG) IVersus R^tpondeate 1. State 2. Joint wiiwftT 1wwif4 fe'zt' <Fii^i< ^afRfiTan^r ^f CG, Through ite Secretaiy, Water Resoiir^es Departmeat, DKS Bhawan, Maatocajaya, Raipur (CG) pirector, Dwisional Ofi&cer, Treasury, Accoun|s & Pension, Baster, Division Jagalpiu- (CO) 3. Executijye Engmecr, Water Resource Department, Divisio^ Kondagaou District Baster (CG) 4. Sub pivisioiifll Officer, Water Resource Departtient, Sub Dwision Narayaapur, District Narayajipur (C6) Writ peUtion uader ArUfele 226 ofthe Constitutdoa oflndia S.B Hon'ble Shri Dhireadrd Mislura. J 27.1.2009 i Mr. RS Fta.tel, lcacned c^iiasel for the petitioner. Mr. MPS Bhatia, leara^l Dy GA for the State. The petitioner has imt>iigaed fhe order of AnnexureP/1 dated 27*h February, 2007 passed poy respondent No.2, whereby recoveiy of Rs.91,090/- has been made poia the petitioner after hra retirement on 30<h June, 2006, ,sSf V^Si31^fS ,i''w'°":ygssss ..^nh*-^ •SO-SQ-JS an^t'wf^'ife ^T^l 3?S^ sb*ffGb ~3^^'*fWW'tt, aifll^f*!®,fctM!-Hg< *IW<E' 1»**tWtt 3^I"^^("^^^) TOnw^rf?a3ii^w Leamed counsel for ihi Reliaace is placed ou fh) The respondents/State| aforesaid petition. Howevei^ ahV<4ld<Tr'F 'Hp^^ W^ Tf^E^It ^'affinsn^r peillluuer yuUiulte Uial'tlic pctiUaner retired as Field Assistaat fix^m the office of Sub Divisional OfiBcer, Water Resoiirces Departmejnt, Sub Division-Narayanpiir, Distt. Narayanpur on 30th Jzine, 20(p6. Thereafter, iDipugued recoveiy order ofAnnexure P/1 has been pa^sed after e^ht monfhs on 27& Pebruaiy, 2007 without issuing aay sbo^ causc notice and withput affording auy opporturdly ofhearmg to the ^etitioner. order dated 8fh September, 2008 passed by thu Court in WP(s) No.4^78/2008 ia the matter of "Ghcmshyam Singh Thakur Vs. Sfate ofCG ^nd othersf. Hcard lcaraed counsel S^r fhe pctitioner. s were aBowed tune to file repty to the no repty has been filed by fhc respondents/ State. Mr. Bhatia, learacd coi|nsel for fhe respondcnts/State docs not dispute that case of the pet^tioner is squarely covered by tfae order passed iu the matter of Ghan^hyam. Singh TTiafcur (supra). Having heard leanaed ^ounsel for fhe parties, having regard to the unrebutted fact in fhe pe1|ttion that the impi^aed recovexy order of Aunexure P/1 was passed w|thout issuaacc of show cause notice to the petitioaer aad wifhout c^Jling for his explanation for payvwes-t of fhe atteged excess aiaount, f^e instant petition is also atlowed iu fhe terms of order dated 8<bj Septeiaber, 2008 passed in WP(s) No.4978/2008 in fhe matter {>f Ghanshyam SiaghThalmr Vs. State of g> s':s;':::,'"^»^Bss^B<rK'gs?s^"' ft > a.^aiiisg-i -,WgK ^ g 3iT^r'%iK;-i ^ff^T^gSRR? Y ^^.•<li4|l<t<t, ®W«*IS;fartK-lg^ «<l*(CTI;9»*ffi» 3!^t'qgSB'(..lyi?js(<^) ^araT^fTOanN ^Rlfe%ft^??PET?if ^ 'fex€t''^-^R ^•aifttisn^T CG aad others. Iiapugaed directmg recoveiy ofRs.91,09 to the petitioner, is hereby pensionaiy benefits/gratuity amouirt has becn recovered, amoitnt with intcrest at fhc to fh.e respondents to take i\ Civfl Semces (Pcnsion) Rules| law foUowing basic principtes 09p/- q^ashed. relte |order dat^l 27.2.2007 (Aimexure P/l) '- on account ofexcess payinent inade The petitioncr is entifled to fuU ^mount wifhout any dcduction. If fhe the petidouer is entitkd to the said of6% per annum. However, it is open scoursc to Rule; 65 of the Chliattisgarh 1976, if so advised, ia accordance wifh {>fnatural justi.cc. No order as to costs. Sd/- '. ! Dhirendra Mishra , Judge S·^iiP!h^tr^S?f*^y^·(C^~^-.^fr-*tfr*·^· i^ :1 i;Uis