wp177-11.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.177 OF 2011 Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai .. Petitioner Versus Chand Bashah A.R. Shaikh and Anr. .. Respondents Mr.S.K.Chari i/b. M.V.Kini & Co. for petitioner Mrs.Neeta Karnik for respondent No.1. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 23rd FEBRUARY 2011 P.C. 1] The consent terms duly signed by the Authorised Signatory of petitioner undertaking and respondent No.1 employee are tendered in court. The representative of the petitioner undertaking and the respondent No.1 employee both are present. In their presence, it is stated that the terms have been executed willingly and the respondent No.1 has understood the consequences after the clauses have been explained to him in the language with which he is familiar. He is aware that upon reinstatement, he has to forego his claim for backwages and will be getting continuity and to that extent the Award stands modified in petitioner's favour. wp177-11.doc 2 2] In the presence of parties, the consent terms are taken on record. Order in terms of consent terms. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. 3] Both sides agree that if the petitioner reports for work on 1st March 2011 at 9.00 a.m., the undertaking will reinstate him in the services, subject to the agreement as recorded in the consent terms. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)