IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 25 OF 2006 M/S DEEKAY REAL ESTATES AND ....Petitioners DEVELOPERS THROUGH ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR SHRI DEU KESHAV NAIK AND ANR., Versus MR. BHIMSEN G. REVANKAR AND ANR., ....Respondents Mr. Dajvip V. Patkar,Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. Aldrin Monteiro, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 13th July, 2006 P.C.:- Heard Mr. D. V. Patkar, the learned Counsel on behalf of the applicants and Mr. A. Monteiro, the learned Counsel on behalf of the respondent no.1. Both the learned Counsel have filed an application for compounding the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. It is submitted that respondent no.1 has received towards the settlement a total sum of Rs.3.5 lakhs. It is also stated that a Demand Draft in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- has been deposited with the Registry of this Court on 10-7-2006 and the balance amount is paid by Demand Draft today. Both the parties are present. From the contents of the application, the compromise arrived at by the parties is accepted. Consequently, the applicants/accused shall stand acquitted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The said Demand Draft of Rs.2.0 lakhs shall be handed over to respondent no.1. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.