BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT ORGANISED BY THE HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : SHRI.R.D.SHENOY (SR.ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) & SHRI. D.PAPPACHAN (RETD. DIST.JUDGE) THURSDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 8TH ASWINA 1932 AS.No. 196 of 1996() ------------------------------- OS.602/1993 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ERNAKULAM ................................ APPELLANT: ------------------- 1. E.SUBRAMANIA IYER ALIAS E.S.MANI, AGED 48, S/O. EASWARA IYER, EXECUTIVE, M/S. T.V.S. & SONS LIMITED, KALOOR, ERNAKULAM, RESIDING AT 'SRINIVAS', 21/2119, A.KG. ROAD, THAIKKOODAM, COCHIN – 19. BY ADV. SRI.S.RADHAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. LAIJU JOSE, AGED 27 YEARS, W/O. P.T. JOSE, PANEKKATT HOUSE, THAIKKOODAM, VYTTILA, COCHIN – 19. 2. SMT. S.VIJAYA, AGED ABOUNT 40, W/O. E.S. MANI (E.SUBRAMANIA IYER), BUSINESS, SREENIVAS, A.K.G. ROAD, THAIKKOODAM, COCHIN – 19. ADV. SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE FOR R SRI.C.N.SREEKUMAR FOR R THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING COME UP FOR DETERMINATION BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT ON 30/09/2010, THE ADALAT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SRI.R.D.SHENOY (SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) AND SRI.D.PAPPACHAN (RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A.S. NO.196 OF 1996 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2010 A W A R D Counsel for the appellant and respondent are present. Plaintiff/respondent also is present. All parties agreed that orders dated 22.07.2010 and 31.08.2010 are fully complied with the respondent having received the entire Rs.3,30,000/- (Rupees Three lakhs thirty thousand only) by two demand drafts, one handed over earlier and the other, handed over today. In view of this, an award is passed that there need not be an executable decree, in that the decree is fully satisfied. As earlier ordered by the Adalat, the court fee paid on the appeal memorandum will be refunded in accordance with law. It is submitted that there is an attachment of the property. In view of the satisfaction of the decree, continuance of the attachment is unnecessary and has to be A.S. NO.196/1996 2 lifted by the court. The order lifting the attachment shall be communicated to the concerned Sub Registrar. Send back the file to court. Sd/- R.D.SHENOY (SENIOR ADVOCATE) Sd/- D.PAPPACHAN (RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE) ss/. //True copy// P.A to Judge A.S. NO.196/1996 3