IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CR No.3568 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.05.2011 Punjab National Bank . . .Petitioner Versus Narinder Singh Bains . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.B.S. Bhatia, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. The tenant is in revision against order of eviction passed by the Court below on an application filed by the landlord under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for short ‘the Act’). At this stage, it would be pertinent to mention that the landlord had filed seven eviction petitions against different tenants out of which six revision petitions namely, CR No.2985 of 2011 titled as “Narinder Kumar and another Vs. Narinder Singh Bains”, CR No.2986 of 2011 titled as “Jaswinder Singh and others Vs. Narinder Singh Bains”, CR No.3011 of 2011 titled as “Jaswinder Singh and others Vs. Narinder Singh Bains”, CR No.3012 of 2011 titled as “Sanjeev Kumar and another Vs. Narinder Singh Bains”, CR No.3013 of 2011 titled as “Munish Kumar Handa Vs. Narinder Singh Bains” and CR No.3014 of 2011 titled as “Bhupinder Singh Vs. Narinder Singh Bains” have already been dismissed by this Court vide its order dated 17.5.2011. In the present case, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the demised premises is not forming part of the same building but he has very fairly conceded that this point was not raised by him in the leave to defend. Moreover, the landlord has proved all the ingredients of Section 13-B of the Act that he is the NRI, owner of the demised premises for over more than five years before filing of the petition and requires it for his personal use and occupation. Hence, I am of the view that there is no error in the order of the Court below by which leave to defend was declined and eviction order has been passed. In view thereof, present revision petition is hereby dismissed in limine though without any order as co costs. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MAY 30, 2011 JUDGE Vivek