-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1747 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 1747 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 1747 OF 2005 Rishabh Kumar Jain........... ... Petitioner. Versus Union of India & Anr. .... ... Respondents. Mr. D. V. Gangal for the Petitioner. Mr. R. C. Master with Mr. Rajiv Chavan for Respondent No.1. Ms. S. I. Shaikh for Respondent No.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : V. G. PALSHIKAR & : V. G. PALSHIKAR & : V. G. PALSHIKAR & D. D. D. B. BHOSALE, JJ. B. BHOSALE, JJ. B. BHOSALE, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : OCTOBER 20, 2005. : OCTOBER 20, 2005. : OCTOBER 20, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : By this petition, the petitioner has made the following prayer : "This Honourable Court may graciously be pleased to call for the records of the case and after going through the same be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ in nature of mandamus or an order or direction directing the Respondents to implement the orders dated 03-05-1991, -: 2 :- 12-12-2001 and 14-12-2001 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench in OA No.373 of 1987, OA No.10 of 1995 and OA No.134 of 1996." 2. The writ jurisdiction of this Court is, therefore, invoked to implement and execute the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, which by law is subordinate to this Court. Such a petition for the purposes of executing orders of subordinate courts is not maintainable. 3. Apart from the fact, the petition is not maintainable. The Petitioner is defending the action taken by the Respondents in the writ petition filed and pending before this Court and yet this writ petition is filed. In our opinion, this amount to abuse to the process of law. We, therefore, dismiss the petition with costs of Rs.2,500/-. **************