HIGH COURT OF CHHATII‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR w.1>. (227) N_o. 5228/2009 ETITIONER , 1) (Defendants) Minketan Choudhary S/o Late Than Singh Aged about 4O years, occupation Service 2) Padman Choudhar’y S/o Late Than Singh aged about 37 years, occupation Proprietor Mahavir Saw Mills 3) Dilip S/o Late Than Singh aged about 35 years, occupation Medical Store Devershi S/o Late Than Singh aged about 32 years, occupation Business Narad Choudhary S/o Late Than Singh aged about 3O years, occupation GrainShop/merchant 5) A11 resident Village Kodatarai Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Forest, Mantralay D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 1) Chitram Choudhary S/o Late Ganesh Ram Choudhary aged about 58 years, occupation Agriculture RESPONDENTS b3 (Plaintiff) 3) Tulsi Ram S/o Late Ganesh Ram Choudhary aged about 55 years, occupation Teacher 4) Dol Narayan S/o Late Ganeshram Choudhary aged about 32 years, occupation Business Nohar Prasad S / o Late Ganeshram Choudhary aged about 50 years, occupation GrainShop/ merchant (Defendants/6,7,8) A11 resident village Kodatarai Tahsil and District Raigarh (0G,) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF NDIA. (SB :Hon’ble'Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Presentz— Mr. Atul Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vinod Kumar Tekam, P.L. for the State/respondent No. l. Mr. H.S. Patel, Advocate for the respondents No. 2. None for the respondent No. 5. Respondents No. 3 8t, 4 dead. P W I ORDER’ (Passed on 31/ 10/2011) Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners has not filed any applicatian on account of death of respondents No. 3 85 4. Considering the nature of order dated 8/7/2009 passed by District Judge, Raigarh, District Raigarh in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 14/2009 & order dated 14/5/2009 passed by Civil Judge, Class~l, Raigarh, District Raigarh in Civil Suit N0. 63—A/2009 even otherwise, I do not find any scope for interference. Consequently, petition is dismissed summarily. Petitioner is at liberty to file suitable petition before the trial Court on account of death of respondents No. 3 85 4. No order as to costs. K x Sd/— T.P Sharma Judge i