IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42631 of 2008 PAPPU SAH, SON OF GAYA PRASAD SAH, R/V DESABPUR DUDAHI, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT GONDA(U.P.)----------------PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR-----------------------OPPOSITE PARTY. For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Nityanand Tiwary, APP ----------- 04. 10.12.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 307 and other allied Sections of the Penal Code and is named in the First Information Report along with two others, namely, Santosh Kumar and Ram Sewak Sah whose prayer for bail has since been rejected by another bench of this Court with observation to renew prayer for grant of bail after completing nine months in jail custody in the court below itself if by then the trial does not conclude. There does not appear to be any distinction between the case of the petitioner and those two named in the F.I.R. In the circumstances, his application for grant of bail is also rejected with the same observation contained in the order dated 8.5.2008 and 16.7.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 7157 of 2008 and 26583 of 2008 respectively. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha,J.)