IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.880 of 2011 RAM PEYARI DEVI W/O LATE RADHA KRISHNA RAI, R/O VILLAGE- KARAHIYA, P.S.-HASANPUR, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. ………….Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SAMASTIPUR. 3. ADD. COLLECTOR, SAMASTIPUR. 4. DY. COLLECTOR LAND REFORMS, ROSERA, SAMASTIPUR. 5. CIRCLE OFFICER, ANCHAL HASANPUR, P.S.-HASANPUR, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. 6. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, S/O SRI KRISHNADEV PRASAD SINGH, R/O VILLAGE DHAIYA, P.S. BHAGWANPUR, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI. …………Respondents ----------- 03 20.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is aggrieved by the revisional order dated 18.08.2010 (Annexure-1), whereby the orders passed by the Courts below have been interfered with and the Revenue Authorities have been permitted to delete the name of the writ petitioner from the revenue records and mutate names of the private respondent in respect of the lands in question. Learned counsel for the petitioner referring to Annexure-2, submits that a suit bearing Title Suit No. 1 of 2007 is already pending between the parties before the learned Civil Judge Ist, Senior Division Rosera. Mutation of names in the revenue records neither creates title nor extinguishes the same. It appears that a suit relating to the land in question between the parties is already pending before a Competent Court of civil jurisdiction. In that view of the matter, this Court while declining interference with the order impugned observes that any finding recorded in Annexure-1 with regard to title and/or possession shall not prejudice the case of the parties in the said suit in any manner. Safik (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)