MC 945/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr Sarma Baruah, Senior Advocate appearing for the applicants (heirs and legal representatives of the deceased petitioner No.1,Kanu Deb) and Mr AR Banerj ee, Senior Advocate assisted by Ms P.Chakraborty for the Opp. Parties. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the partiers and on a consideration of the averments made in the application, the prayer for substitution of the ap plicants in place of their deceased predecessor-in-interest aforenamed is allow ed. Though, having regard to the nature of the parent proceeding in CRP No.4 01/2009 which is under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the rigour of t he provisions of CPC is not attracted, it is clarified that the substitution as above, has been ordered after setting aside the abatement thereof (CRP No.401/0 9) for the delay involved. Misc cases stand allowed in the above terms.