1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 202 OF 2009 Shaikh Mainoddin Bashirsab .. .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra and others .. .. Respondents Shri M. C. Syed, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. K. Tambe, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nso. 1 and 2. Shri V. S. Panpatte, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3 and 4. CORAM : B. R. GAVAI, AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 31ST AUGUST, 2009. ORAL ORDER [ Per B. R. Gavail, J. ] : 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition with a grievance that, though he was directed to be absorbed by the respondent No. 2 in respondent No. 4 school vide order dated 18th October, 2008, he was not absorbed. 2. An affidavit in reply has been filed by the Education Officer/respondent No. 2 stating therein that, the petitioner has 2 already been absorbed at Sadhana High School, Degloor vide order dated 03rd June, 2009. It is submitted that, accordingly, the petitioner has also joined the school and pay bills for salary of the petitioner of July 2009 is submitted to the Education Officer. In that view of the matter, main grievance of the petitioner does not survive. 3. The petitioner submits that, still grievance of petitioner in so far as salary between 18th October, 2008 till the date on which he was permitted to join in the said school, survives. In so far as said grievance is concerned, petitioner is at liberty to make representation to the Education Officer. On such representation being made, the Education Officer shall consider the same within a period of one month from the receipt of the representation. The petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ B. R. GAVAI, J.] bsb/August 09