IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34339 of 2009 Anil Jha @ Anil Kumar Jha Versus State Of Bihar ----------- 07. 18.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Of twenty seven (27) beneficiaries, none was paid the amount allowed to them through different cheques rather of several money withdrawn, matter is thoroughly investigated by the Investigating Officer. On request of this petitioner a report was called for from the District Magistrate, Darbhanga, which is on record, informant is only there to state that photographs and other papers were handed over to this petitioner for opening the account, but report of District Magistrate is clear that photographs of all the beneficiaries are identified by Panchayat Sachiv and all the care have not been taken by bank officials while payment of twelve beneficiaries was made. Observation of the District Magistrate is there that basically member of Panchayat Samiti namely Rajesh Kumar Jha @ Raman Jha is responsible for deposit and fake withdrawal, bank officials have also been fixed liability; suggestion is also there about realization of the withdrawn amount and payment of the rest to entitled persons. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of 2 one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Biraul at Benipur, Darbhanga in connection with Ghanshyampur P. S. Case No.113 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)