IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13091 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision : 20.1.2010. Jit Parkash and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Gurcharan Dass, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking a mandamus to direct the State of Punjab to grant them notional promotions and consequential benefits including the revised retiral benefits. The petitioner Nos.2 & 3 have already been granted the relief sought by them. As regards petitioner No.1, it is averred that so far he has not been assigned the deemed date of promotion to the post of Assistant Registrar (Examination) from 1.1.1987 nor his pay and retiral benefits have been paid, refixed or arrears paid. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to C.W.P.No .13091 of 2008 (O&M) 2 the respondents to consider the claim of petitioner No.1 also in the light of the decision of this Court dated 8.12.2004 rendered in CWP No.11071 of 2001 (Resham Singh Pandher versus State of Punjab and others) (Annexure P-9), and if found entitled, to grant him the due relief within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Disposed of. Dasti. 20-01-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE