CRP 313/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE H. BARUAH. Heard Mr. D. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the revision petitioner as well as Mr . A. Nath, learned counsel for the respondents. This revision is directed against the order dated 09-06-2009 passed by C ivil Judge No. 1, Cachar, Silchar in Misc. Appeal No. 5 of 2009, whereby and whe reunder the appeal so filed against the order dated 21-02-2009 passed in Misc. C ase No. 67 of 2008 arising out of Title Suit No. 186 of 2008 has been dismissed. Mr. D. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the revision petitioner indicating the order dated 28-08-2009 passed by this Court contends that since this Court w hile issuing notice on the respondents directed the parties to the revision peti tion to maintain status quo in respect of the suit premises as on that date and since the title suit reaches the stage of evidence before the trial court, in th e fitness of things, the status quo in respect of the suit premises directed to be maintained by the parties may be allowed to be maintained until disposal of t he suit and this revision may accordingly be disposed of. Mr. A. Nath, learned counsel appearing for the respondents also concedes that since the suit reaches the stage of recording of evidence, the status quo directed to be maintained by this court vide order dated 28-8-2009 be required t o be maintained until disposal of the suit pending before the trial court. In view of the facts involved in this case and the order dated 28-08-200 9 directing the parties to this proceeding to maintain status quo in respect of the suit premises, this revision petition stands disposed of with the following direction: That the parties to this proceeding shall maintain status quo in respect of the suit premises until disposal of the Title Suit No. 186 of 2008.