IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36027 of 2010 RAJU MAHALDAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 09.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner is named in the FIR and during the course of investigation, it came to light that petitioner and the victim had gone to attend marriage ceremony and after that victim was found missing. Except this, there is nothing against this petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I direct petitioner (Raju Mahaldar) to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM, Purnea in Sadar (Muffasil) P.S. Case no. 211 of 2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)