IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.1104 OF 2003 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.1387 OF 2002 Cinecita Comoptronics Industries P.Ltd. .. Plaintiffs Vs. Paresh Sorathia .. Defendant Ms.Neeta Solanki i/b Kiran Jain and Co. for the plaintiffs Mr.Chetan Kapadia i/b Harakhchand and Co. for the defendant WITH SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.1103 OF 2003 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2031 OF 2002 Cinecita Comoptronics Industries P.Ltd. .. Plaintiff Vs. Shaila Bangera .. Defendant WITH SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.1105 OF 2003 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.1386 OF 2002 Cinecita Comoptronics Industries P.Ltd. .. Plaintiffs Vs. Vinayak Deo .. Defendant Ms.Hema Desai i/b Jayesh Desai and Associates for the plaintiffs CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J DATED : 23RD AUGUST, 2005 DATED : 23RD AUGUST, 2005 DATED : 23RD AUGUST, 2005 P.C.: . The learned counsel for the plaintiffs states that he does not wish to press the Summons for Judgment against the defendants at all and seeks leave to withdraw the same with an undertaking that he will not take out Summons for Judgment after serving the defendants the writ of summons which is not yet served though three years have expired. In view thereof, Summons for Judgments are dismissed with aforesaid undertaking.