IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31190 of 2008 KUMAR MANISH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 28.8.2008. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. Allegation against the petitioner is that he has managed to get appointment on compassionate ground after his mother’s death suppressing necessary information that his father is alive and working as a government employee. If the father and mother both are in service in that case on account of death of any one legal heirs are not entitled to get compassionate appointment. Counsel for the petitioner submits that in the proforma for compassionate appointment there is no column for such disclosure , as such he did not mention it, and it was not intentional. Considering the aforesaid fact prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. The petitioner namely Kumar Manish is directed to surrender before the C.J.M Muzaffarpur within four weeks from today and on his so surrendering he shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Muzaffarpur in connection with Hathauri P.S.Case no11 of 2008 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J)