HIGH CQURT OF CHHAmSGARH : BILASRJR WRFT PETITION (Cl N0.4646 OF 2008 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS South Eastern Coalfields Ltd., through Chief General manager, Dfpka Area, SECL, Distt. Korba (CG). Versus Union of India, through Secretary, Ministry of Environment & Forests, Govemment of India, Paryavaran Bhawan, CGO Complex, Lodi Road, NewDelhi-110003. Chhattisgarh Environment ConservatiQn Board, through tts Member Swretary, 1 Tilak Nagar, Avanti Vlhar, Ralpur (CG). Regional Officer, Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board, Near Tehsit Office, Rampur, Korba, DistrictKorba (CG). C/Vrit petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of tndia) Singte Bench : Hon'bleShri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Dr. N.K. Shukla, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ritu Mishra, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri Ashok Verma, standing counsel for the Union of India/respondent No.1. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, counsel for the respondents No.2 & 3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 7th day of January, 2009) With the consent of leamed counsel appearing forthe parties, ^he petition is heard finally. 2) Leamed counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents No.2 & 3 submits that the Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board (ftsrshort 1 e Boanf) has issued a directfon and nottee dated 23-7-2008 (Annexure-P/1) and thereafter notice on 7-10-2008 for which the petitioner has already submitted its response. The Board shall consider the matter and take decision, in accordance with taw, 7^ ==^I -?-• ^ -^t ti'-i ^^y./ ^-^ESS^ • Gowrl on both the notices and fresh orders will be passedwithin a period of two weeks. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents No.2 & 3/Board further submits that till then no action will be taken against the petitioner. , 3) Dr. Shukla, leamed senior counsel appearing on tehalf of the petitioner, next submits that since the nrtices dated 23-7-2008 and 7-10-2008 are under consideration by the Board.it is not nece^ry to adjudteate upon thedispute involved in this case. Learned counsel prays thatthe matter may bedisposed of. 4) In view of the aforesaid fair submission of leamed counsel for the respondents No.2 & 3, according to leamed counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives inthis petition for adjudication. 5) Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. s<u- Sa^^^ ^judge ^t. .';• '-•''^sssw '-^s^a^^ss^:' ^iES^.