IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10812 of 2009 1. KAMAL SAH 2. TINU SAH @ TINKU SAH, BOTH SONS OF SRI RAM PUKAR SAH, R/V FATEHPUR PHULWARIA, P.S. SARAI, DISTRICT VAISHALI -------PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR------OPP. PARTY. ----------- 02. 22.05.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Sections 379, 384 and other allied Sections of the Penal Code and Sections 3(i)(x) of the SC ST Prevention of Atrocities Act. It is submitted on their behalf that they are named in the First Information Report but when the informant was examined under Section 164 Cr.P.C, he did not confirm the presence of the petitioners at the time of occurrence, although he has named the others. Let the petitioners, namely, Kamal Sah and Tinu Sah @ Tinku Sah surrender in the court below within four weeks from today and as they are not named in the 164 Cr.P.C. statement of the informant they be admitted to the privilege of bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 172 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)