IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15575 of 2010 MANRUP SINGH AGED 60 YEARS, SON OF LATE PRAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PATHRA, P.O. & P.S. TILAUTHU, DISTRICT- ROHTAS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM- SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SINCHAI BHAWAN, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR PROVIDENT FUND DIRECTORATE, PANT BHAWAN, PATNA 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, DEHRI, DISTRICT- ROHTAS 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, SONE CANAL MODERNISATION, CIRCLE, DEHRI, DISTRICT- ROHTAS 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SONE BARRAGE DIVISION, INDRAPURI, DISTRICT-ROHTAS 6. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, ROHTAS AT SASARAM 7. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA ----------- 2 17.09.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that although the petitioner is receiving his pension, however the same has not been revised on account of implementation of the 6th Pay Revision Committee’s Report w.e.f. 01.01.2006. Besides the above, it is submitted that some amount of G.P.F. has remained to be settled and paid. Mr. P.K. Verma learned Additional Advocate General No. XI appearing for the respondent-State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the grievance with regard to revision of pension, petitioner - 2 - proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.5 and a separate representation before the respondent no.6 with regard to the grievance against lesser payment of provident fund dues. In view of the above, in case such representations stating details of unpaid claims are filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the respective representations shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representations so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable may also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)