‘~x\_~ HIGH COURT OF CHHAT'I‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR W WRIT PETITION No. 2145 of200l V PETITIONERS : 1 . Angesh Kumar Chande] aged about 26 years b/o Ebhuram Chanda]. R/o Vmage Heremra; , Post omce : Pendravan, Tahsu Dhmnda, ‘ Distt Durg Chhatusgarh r c {3? 2. Pumsottam Smgh, aged about ‘§6 yeaxs s/o , Panna smgh Rajput, R/o vmaga Dmggabhat, Post Ofhce : Dargaon, D1<stt.r : Durg Chhattxsearh 7 3. Shree Penneshwar Das aged about 26 years S/o Amar Das Va1shnaw R/o V11lage Pagbandln Post 0mce Pendravan, Tahml Dhamda, Distt Durg Chhattlsgarh 4. Yuvraj Patel aged about 27 years, S/o' Dhanbar Smgh, R/o Village Medesara, Post M O$ce Medesara, D1stt Durg Chhatttsgarh Sanjay Kumar aged about 30 years S/o TSChantarre R/o Village : Dihpara. Post {omce Dhotbam Dlsm Durg Chimnsgarh I 6. Ashok Kumar Deshmukh aged about 26 years g/o Hasdhar Dwhmukh, R/o V1]lage 8ewat1 Post Ofloe ' Nagpura, Dislt "Durg Chhattlsgarh ‘ 7. Uttam Dewangaon, aged about 28 years. s/o < Malesmgh Dewangaon, R/o Vxllage Siltara, Post Office : Dhamda, Distt z Mg Chhattnsgath . Gurudev Prasad Chandel, aged about 27 yeals S/o Gendlal Lhandel, R/o Vlllage Emma, Post omoe : Pendraban, Tahsil Dhanda, Dlstt Durg Chhattrsgarh _ . . 9. Karanlal Velma, aged about 26 years S/o Laxmanram Verma, R/o V1llage Dodlq Post Odice Ch1cha. Distt DurE Chhatttsgam VERsUS RESPONDENTS :1. btate of Chhattxsgarh. Through Secretary Depamnent of Panchayat, D K Bhawan, Govt of Chhamsgarh, Secretariat, Rmpur (Chhattisgarh) 2. District Education OEwer, Education Durg (Chhattisgarh) Department, Durg, Distt. : 3. Chief Executive Oiiicer (Jila Bganchayat} Burg Dlstt Durg(Chhatt1sgarh} 4. Chlet Executwe Omcer (Janpad Panchayat) Dhamda. D1stt Durg (Chhattisgarh) I WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226f227 OF THE CONSTITUEION. OF mDIA SB: H'on’hle SM Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present. Shn N P Koshta. Advocate tor the pennoners . z Shn Arun $30 Government Advocate for the State/respondent No 1 and 2 ORAL ORDER (Passed on 215 day of July, 2008) . 1. Leamed counsel appealing for the petitioner submits that this petition has become inmctuous. Learned counsel appearm'g for the Statehespondent No. l and 2 does not controvert the saldmbntission. - Accordingly, the petitioii‘ is dismissed as having become inii'uauous. K. NI No order asto costs. Consequently, M(W)P No. 571/2002, application for stay of openation and effect of order dated 27.6.2002 and 10.7.2002, standsidisposed of. Sd/— Salish K. Agm'hotri Judge r ‘ it i i l