IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4329 of 2011 SARITYA DEVI W/O ATBARI DAS, R/O VILL.-JAGAI PO- JAGAI, PS & DISTT-BANKA--PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECY. WELFARE DEPTT GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR SOCIAL & WELFARE, DEPTT. GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DEPUTY SECY. WELFARE DEPTT. GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BANKA 5. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, BANKA 6. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BANKA 7. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, BANKA-------RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 14.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. According to petitioner in terms of annexure-1 she was selected on the post of Anganbari Sahayika. That was way back in the year, 2002. The appointment letter/call letter are on record. Petitioner got aggrieved because an advertisement has been issued by the respondent in a local newspaper known as Danik Jagran on 24.12.2010 indicating the vacancy position as well as the requirement to fill up the posts by fixing date for holding of Aam Sabha. So far as the petitioner is concerned the Panchayat in question is Jagai and centre is Jagai. If the petitioner had already been appointed and there is no letter or order of her removal what was the need for re- advertising the post is not understood. Since the State has not filed any affidavit on this issue the Court does not have any information as to the circumstances of re-advertising the post. But the Court is surely - 2 - not happy about the position that she has approached the District Magistrate, Banka and District Programme Officer, Banka by way of her applications contained in annexure-5 series dated 6.1. 2011 and 28.12.2010 respectively and till date she has not been told as to the reason or the background under which annexure-4, the advertisement has been issued. This writ application is disposed of with a direction upon the District Programme Officer, Banka that he will inform the petitioner about the reason or circumstances for taking steps for filling up the post when there is nothing on record to show that petitioner has been removed from the post. Communication to the petitioner would be made on the issue stating the factual position within six weeks. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)