IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2010 / 8TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 20153 of 2010(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.MOHAMMED ARIF, S.S.TRADERS, VATTEKKAD, KOLLENGODE, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON SRI.MAHESH V.MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, PALAKKAD. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM. 3. INSPECTING ASST.COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.20153 of 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T Challenging Ext.P1 assessment order passed by the first respondent, petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal along with Ext.P3 petition for stay which are pending consideration before the second respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that without any regard to the pendency of the proceedings, the third respondent has issued Ext.P4 notice under the Revenue Recovery Act, which is sought to intercepted in this writ petition. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents as well. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the second respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exts.P3 interlocutory application, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that till such orders are passed on Exts.P3 W.P.(C) No.20153/2010 2 interlocutory application, all further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P4 notice shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. nj.