IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21889 of 2011 Geeta Devi @ Soni Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 22.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with Haveli Kharagpur P.S.Case No. 93/2008 dated 02.6.2008 registered under Sections 147,148,149,436,380,427 of the IPC and Section 4 of Public Property Damage Act, 3/4 Explosive Substance Act and 17 C.L.A.Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only on the basis of confessional statement made before the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Banka she has been made accused in the present case .He submits that though the petitioner was an accused in Belhar P.S.Case No. 122/2009 but has been enlarged on bail in the said case by this Court. He further submits that the petitioner has not made such confessional statement and her implication in this case is with malafide intention and he also submits that other co-accused in the case namely, Arvind Kumar Arya @ Arvind Das, Pappu Paswan @ Ramanand Bharti,Nawal Kishore Mandal @ Nawal Mandal, Rajendra Kumar,Mukesh Bind @ Mukesh Kumar, Pawandeo Tanti @Pappu, Arjun Pardha@ Arjun Ray and Shambhu Das, have been granted bail by this Court by various orders. He has also provided copies of order which are being 2 kept on record. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, FTC-V,Munger in connection with Sessions Trial No. 227/2011 arising out of Haveli Kharagpur P.S.Case No. 93/2008. It is made clear that one of the bailers should be the blood relation of the petitioner. Sudha ( Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)