IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 17010 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: November 09, 2009 Asha Rani .........PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab and Others ......RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present: Mr. R.S. Rangpuri, Advocate, for the petitioner. AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel contends that the retiral benefits of the petitioner would be withheld on superannuation in August 2010. So as to resolve the controversy, the petitioner has already served a legal notice dated 11.09.2009 to show that the case of the petitioner is covered by the judgment dated 28.05.2009 rendered in CWP No. 20214 of 2008 titled Jagdish Lal Vs. State of Punjab. I find that the petition to be pre-mature. The petitioner is scheduled to superannuate in August 2010. This petition is dispoded of as pre-mature, however, with directions to the respondents to take into account the contents of the legal notice dated 11.09.2009 (Anneuxre P-5) before taking a decision for withholding the retiral benefits. 09.11.2009 (AJAI LAMBA) shivani JUDGE