1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.14725/2009 M/s Apsara Carpets Company Pvt. Ltd. v. The Recovery Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur & Anr. Date of Order :: 30th November, 2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Kailash Chand Tailor, for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Sharma] Mr. Sanjeev Arora] for the respondent No.2. ..... The petitioner borrowed a loan from the respondent Bank but looking to default in payment of that the Bank preferred an original application before Debt Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur and that came to be decreed vide judgment dated 7.5.2004. Accordingly, a certificate of recovery for the amount of Rs.43,29,415.18 with interest @ 10% per annum was issued on 7.5.2004 itself. An execution application then was preferred before the recovery officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur and in continuity of that a proclamation of sale was issued on 13.10.2009. To assail validity of the same this petition for writ is preferred. It is contended that after getting decree and judgment dated 7.5.2004 the Bank compromised the issue with the petitioner in the year 2007 and as such now the decree cannot be executed. I do not find any merit in the argument advanced. The decree was passed much back on 7.5.2004 and thereafter just as an indulgence the respondents may have considered compromise proposals but in no event that frustrates the process of execution. It is also pertinent to note that 2 whatever proposal earlier given to satisfy the default was also not adhered by the petitioner. As such no case is made out for interference by this Court. The petition for writ is accordingly dismissed. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. kkm/ps.