IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3716 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 3716 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 3716 OF 2002 Reliance Industries Limited & anr.... Petitioners versus State of Maharashtra & ors. .... Respondents. ALOGWITH ALOGWITH ALOGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 4711 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 4711 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 4711 OF 2005 Somaiya Organo Chemicals Ltd. .... Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents. ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 558 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 558 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 558 OF 2002 Hindoostan Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd. and anr. .... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents. ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 652 OD 2001 PETITION NO. 652 OD 2001 PETITION NO. 652 OD 2001 M/s. Eurotex Industries and Exports Limited & anr. .... Petitioners. versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent. ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2604 OF 2001 PETITION NO. 2604 OF 2001 PETITION NO. 2604 OF 2001 M/s. Amit Spinning Industries LImited and another............Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent. ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2849 OF 2001 PETITION NO. 2849 OF 2001 PETITION NO. 2849 OF 2001 M/s. Lupin Chemicals Ltd. ... Petitioner. verus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent. ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3005 OF 2001 PETITION NO. 3005 OF 2001 PETITION NO. 3005 OF 2001 M/s. Pudumjee Pulp & Paper limited and ors. ..... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent. ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3006 OF 2001 PETITION NO. 3006 OF 2001 PETITION NO. 3006 OF 2001 Indo Count Industries Ltd. & ors. ... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 4847 OF 2001 PETITION NO. 4847 OF 2001 PETITION NO. 4847 OF 2001 Godawat Pan Masala Products (I) Pvt. Ltd. & ors. ..... Petitioners. versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent. ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 4848 OF 2001 PETITION NO. 4848 OF 2001 PETITION NO. 4848 OF 2001 Carbon Everflow Limited & ors ... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent. ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 380 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 380 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 380 OF 2002 Nagreeka Exports Limited & ors. ..Petitioner. versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent. ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 864 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 864 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 864 OF 2002 Herdillia Chemicals Limited & anr.... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent. ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1295 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 1295 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 1295 OF 2002 M/s. Standard Industries Ltd. & anr. .. Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent. ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1336 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 1336 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 1336 OF 2002 M/s. Mukund Limited & anr. ... Petitioner. versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent. ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1636 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 1636 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 1636 OF 2002 M/s. Ganil Era Textiles Ltd. ... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2940 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 2940 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 2940 OF 2002 Soma Textiles & Industries Limited & anr. .... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent. ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3132 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 3132 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 3132 OF 2002 Jindal Polyster ltd. & anr. .... Petitioner. versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent. Shri C. Balsare i/b. A.S.Dayal & Associates for the petitioner in W.P.3716/02. Shri Amit S. Potnis i/b. Tanhane & Co. for the petitioner in W.P.Nos. 380/02, 864/02, 3005/01, 3006/01, 3132/02, 4847/01 & 4848/01. Shri F. Sayyed i/b. M.K.Ambalal & Co. for the petitioner in W.P. No.558/02. Shri Nooroddin Dhila i/b. M/s. Hariyani & Co. for the petitioner in W.P.no. 4711/05. Shri S,.J.Shah i/b H. Jagatiani & Co. for the petitioner in W.P.Nos. 652/01, 1295/02, 1336/02, 1636/02, 2604/01 & 2849/02. Shri R.Chitnis i/b V.Deshpande & Co. for the petitioner in W.P.No. 2940/02. Shri S.R.Nargolkar AGP for Respondent no.1 in all matters. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.M. V.M. V.M. KANADE, JJ. KANADE, JJ. KANADE, JJ. DATED; DATED; DATED; 6TH JUNE, 2006. 6TH JUNE, 2006. 6TH JUNE, 2006. P.C: P.C: P.C: 1. By all these petitions, the petitioners have challenged the action of the respondent in charging them for guaranteed electric supply at an enhanced rate after having invited them to have captive power plant for generating electricity for their needs. 2. The concessions granted in this regard was withdrawn by the State and therefore, the present petitions challenging that action were filed. During the pendency of these petitions the concessions granted earlier have been restored. 3. Therefore, the only grievance which may be made is regarding payment of the enhanced rates during the period when the concession stood reduced or withdrawn. If such greivance does exist the petitioners who have such grievance, will make a representation in that regard to the respondent State, as also to the Electricity Board and if it is so made, they shall decide the same as early as possible preferably in four weeks. The interim order granted earlier to continue till the decision of the representation by the Respondents. Petitions accordingly disposed of. ....