IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 210 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 210 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 210 OF 2006 Krishna Dhondu Jaigade. ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Maharashtra & 5 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. S. Mishra i/b Pandey & Co. for the petitioners. Mr. K.R. Belosey, AGP, for the respondents No.1 to 6. Mrs. S. Ajit Kumar for the respondent Nos.2 to 5. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 06TH MARCH, 2006 P.C. : . According to the petitioner himself, the constructions have been demolished. Once that be the case, no relief would be available to the petitioner. It will be open to the petitioner, if in law he is so entitled, to apply to the Corporation for development permission and for the Corporation to consider the same according to law. We also make it clear that if the petitioner has any other grievance against respondents, it will be open for him to avail of such remedy before the competent forum. : 2 : 2. With the above observation, Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]