HIGH COURT OF CHHATT15GARH BILASPUR WP. (Art 227) No.193912o1o ?ETiTlONER Manmohan Chandra, aged about ‘ 48 years, S/o Late B.S. Chandra, R/o Village Sallini, Tahsil Jaijepur, District Janjgir—Champa (CG) Versus RESPoNDENTs 1 State Transport Appeiiate Tribunal, Raipur (CG) 2 Secretary, Regional Transport ‘ Authority, Bilaspur (CG) 3 Rakesh Singh, S/o Bharat Singh. R/o Badan Bus service Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 CF THE CONSTlTUTiON OF lNDlA ‘ - Appearance : Mr. Santosh Gupta, Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Sao, Government Advocate for respondent No.2 on advance copy. ORAL 0§6§R (2e.04.2o10) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard. \ Petitioner -Manmohan Chandra has filed this petition challenging the validity of order dated 26.03.2010 passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal (STAT), Raipur in Revision No.07/2010. By the said order, the aforesaid Revision tiled against the order dated 04.03.2010 passed by respondent No.2, has been dismissed by the S.T.A.T. The petitioner and respondent No.3 are the bus operators. The dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.3 is in relation to grant of temporary permit to WP. (Art 227) No.1939i2010 respondent No.3 by the Secretary, Regionai Transport Authority, Bilaspur on the route Jashpur to Sakti. The copy . of the permit has been filed as Annexure P/2. ’ A perusai of Annexure P/2 wouid show that the temporary permit has been granted for the period commencing from O1 .042010 and ending on 30.04.2010. in view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, when only 3-4 days are ieft so far as the life of the permit is concerned, I am not inciined to entertain this writ petition against the impugned order dated 26.03.2010 confirming the grant of temporary permit to respondent No.3 by respondent No.2 vide order dated 04.03201 0. The petition, therefore, is iiabte to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- - SUNE KUMAR SNHA, j r r i Judge ,f,_i shyna