IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3938 of 2011 Decided on: 31st May, 2011. Kashmiri Lal. …Petitioner. Versus HIMUDA & others. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. A.K. Vashishta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. S.C. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved since he is transferred within around two years to retire from service. But the fact remains that he has completed the normal tenure at the present station. Be that as it may. As per the policy of the State Government, as far as possible the persons who are retiring within two years from service are to be adjusted at the places according to their convenience. According to the petitioner, there are two vacancies at Palampur. The petitioner may file a detailed representation before the first respondent within a week from today pointing out all aspects of the matter as well, in which case the matter will be duly 2 considered by the first respondent and appropriate action will be taken within another one week from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. In case the petitioner is relieved in the meanwhile, he may not be compelled to join the transferred station and it will be open for him to avail leave of the kind due. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 31st May, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr) Judge. 3