IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 14TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 23RD BHADRA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 986 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------- MUHAMMED SHERIF, S/O.MUHAMMED ALIAS BAVA, AGED 48 YEARS, THARAMEL HOUSE, CHELAMPRA P.O., THIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- M.T.KALYANIKUTTY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUR, PIN-676101, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY G.P. SHRI SANDESH RAJA THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C.O.(C) No. 986 of 2010-S - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 14th day of September, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioner mainly alleges that in spite of Annexure V judgment passed by this Court in R.P.No.533/2010, the Revenue Divisional Officer passed an order as per Annexure VII, prohibiting the petitioner from taking soil from his property, purporting to have passed on 1.7.2010. 2. Learned Govt. Pleader brought to my notice an order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer dated 2.8.2010 after considering the directions in R.P.No.533/2010. A reading of the order shows that therein the circular dated 5.4.2010 issued by the Government has also been considered. Therefore, the remedy of the petitioner is to challenge the order dated 2.8.2010. Without prejudice to challenge the same, the C.C.C. is closed. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/