IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.116 of 2009 AWADHESH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 8.1.2010. I have heard Sri Indrajit Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner on the Special Leave Application. The application seeks Special Leave to Appeal against the judgement of acquittal dated 12.2.2009 passed in Sessions Trial No.123 of 2001 by which the learned Presiding Officer of F.T.C.III, Bettiah has acquitted the five accused persons(respondents no.2 to 6) of the charge under Section 395 IPC. The prosecution was initiated on a petition of complaint alleging that a dacoity was committed by the accused persons in the house of the complainant Awadhesh Yadav. The evidence of the witnesses has been discussed by the learned Judge separately and by such discussion the learned Judge has brought out the inherent contradictions which improbablises the story and after such discussion he went on to acquit the accused persons of the charge. After having gone through the impugned judgement, the court finds that the judgement - 2 - was passed on proper appreciation of evidence and there is no element of perversity afflicting the impugned judgement. In the result, the Special Leave Application is dismissed. The appeal is also dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )