IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10668 of 2011 Sri Brijnandan Prasad Versus Sri Uchit Singh ----------- 02. 08.07.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed against the order dated 27.05.2011 passed by Subordinate Judge Ist, Patna in Title Suit No.589 of 1990 whereby the learned Court below rejected the petitioner’s application as contained in Annexure 4 whereby prayer was made to reject the affidavit, i.e., examination-in-Chief of P.W.4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in fact the examination-in-Chief of P.W.4 is irrelevant and cannot be considered. All these points are available to the petition at the time of final hearing of the suit and not at this stage. It appears that the learned Court below noted the submissions of the learned counsels at length and thereafter rejected the application. By the impugned order, in my opinion, no injustice has been caused to any party, so, it is not the case where supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 is required to be exercised. Thus, this writ application is dismissed. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)