HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 5647 OF 2010 Between: Kandru Srinivasa Rao S/o Veera Raghavaiah ..... PETITIONER AND Venigalla Sudarshana Rao , S/o Venkata Ramaiah .....RESPONDENT ORAL ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is preferred aggrieved by the order and decree dated 5.8.2010 passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Fast Track Court, Guntur in E.P.No. 519 of 2009 in O.S.No. 459 of 2006. Petitioner herein is the decree holder. He filed E.P.No. 519 of 2009 against the judgment debtor under Order 21 Rules 37 and 38 of CPC for the recovery of EP amount of Rs. 5,45,145/-. That E.P. was dismissed holding that the judgment debtor clearly proved that he has no means to discharge the EP amount as the house is not standing in his name and no car is standing in his name as he has been working as a driver of the cars. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the order of the court below is contrary to law and vitiated by material irregularities. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also perused the material made available on record. As seen from the record, there is nothing on record to show that the judgment debtor is the owner of the site on which a house was constructed and even the decree holder himself also admitted that judgment debtor is a driver. Therefore, the court below rightly held that the judgment debtor has no means to discharge the EP amount. Hence, I see no reasons to interfere with the order passed by the Court below and the Civil Revision Petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J DATE: 24.12.2010 KA ... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. 2 CD copies.