IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH JUNE 2011 / 25TH JYAISHTA 1933 RFA.No. 524 of 2005() --------------------- OS.12/2003 of SUB COURT,KATTAPPANA .................... APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS: ------------------------------------------ 1. SURESH, S/O. SEBASTIAN, AGED BOUT 35 YEARS, THENGUMPALLIL HOUSE, ANAKKARA KARA, ANAKKARA VILLAGE,UDUMPANCHOLA TALUK. 2. ROSAMMA, W/O. SEBASTIAN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, THENGUMPALLIL HOUSE, ANAKKARA KARA,ANAKKARA VILLAGE,UDUMPANCHOLA TALUK. 3. ABRAHAM, S/O. SEBASTIAN, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, THENGUMPALLIL HOUSE, ANAKKARA KARA, ANAKKARA VILLAGE,UDUMPANCHOLA TALUK. 4. CLARAMMA, D/O. SEBASTIAN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, THENGUMPALLIL HOUSE, ANAKKARA KARA, ANAKKARA VILLAGE,UDUMPANCHOLA TALUK. 5. MARYKUTTY, D/O. SEBASTIAN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, THENGUMPALLIL HOUSE, ANAKKARA KARA, ANAKKARA VILLAGE,UDUMPANCHOLA TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.C.M.TOMY, SRI.MATHEW SKARIA, SRI.JOSE THOMAS (PEEDIKAYIL). RESPONDENT(S): PLAINTIFF: --------------------------------------------- JOMON, S/O. THOMAS, AGED 35 YEARS, MUNDAPLACKAL HOUSE,MARYKULAM KARA, AYYAPPANCOIL VILLAGE, UDUMPANCHOLA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE MATHEW THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JJ. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * R.F.A.No.524 of 2005 --------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of June 2011 J U D G M E N T Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. Read order dated 05/04/2011 on the caption R.F.A.No.524/2005 and I.A.No.1057/2011. 2. Following that order, the direction contained in paragraph 5 therein has been complied with by the appellants- defendants by paying the respondent-plaintiff an amount of Rs.3,50,000/- in all, within the time prescribed. It is stated by the learned counsel for the respondent-plaintiff that a memo showing payment of the amount has been filed before the court below. 3. We record the submission. Accordingly, the appeal is treated as settled out of court and the order of attachment is lifted hereby. Refund one half of the court fee to the appellant. R.F.A.No.524/05 2 It is further declared that the decree impugned in this appeal has been duly satisfied. The appeal is ordered accordingly. (THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) (S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE) jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge