IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3467 of 2005 AWADHESH PRASAD SINHA Versus MAGADH UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- 05/ 19.02.2010 Heard Mr. O.P. Agarwal for the petitioner and Mr. Jay Shankar Barnwal, learned counsel appearing for the University and Mr. Shankar Kumar, assisting counsel to A.A.G. 5 for the State. The petitioner who superannuated from the post of a Reader with effect from 30.11.1999 had filed the writ petition for payment of his post retiral and other benefits. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the University in which the details of payment of the post retiral and other dues of the petitioner has been set out in paragraph-5 to 10 of the affidavit. However, it is stated that the payment of leave encashment is under process and would be paid to the petitioner. In respect of bill presented by the petitioner, it is stated that the same has been sent to the Auditor for verification and the same would be cleared no sooner the Auditor verify the same. Having regard to the statement made in the counter affidavit of the University no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and the same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to take all possible steps for making payment of the leave 2 encashment amount of the petitioner and the bill claimed by the petitioner within a period of three months from today. If the petitioner is aggrieved by any of the calculation of his post retiral and other dues, he may raise his grievance before the University and which may be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. The Auditors are also under direction to ensure compliance of this order. The writ petition stands disposed of. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)