IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2011 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 24536 of 2011(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------- C.SATHEESAN, S/O.K.C.CHELLAPPAN, AGED 42 YEARS, ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MECHANICAL, DREDGER SUB DIVISION, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM-682030 BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, MECHANICAL, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 3. THE SUPERINTENDENTING ENGINEER, MECHANICAL, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MECHANICAL DIVISION(IRRIGATION) CIVIL STATION, ALAPPUZHA-688013. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.JOSE ADIYOLI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BKA WP(C).No. 24536 of 2011(N) APPENDIX PETITIONER'(S) EXHIBITS: EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE G.O(RT)NO.462/06/WRD OF THE GOVERNMENT. EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.19695/A1/05/WRD OF THE GOVERNMENT EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE EXTRACT FOR DECLARATION OF PROBATION. EXT.P4:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.E1-1164/04(1) OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER. EXT.P5:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.E1-1164/04 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P6:- COPY OF THE G.O.(RT)NO.882/2008/WRD OF THE GOVERNMENT. EXT.P7:- COPY OF THE G.O.(RT)NO.932/2010/WRD OF THE GOVERNMENT. RESPONDENT'(S) EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE BKA K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------ WP(C) NO. 24536 OF 2011 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 13th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, working as an Asst. Executive Engineer, Mechanical, in the Irrigation Department, has filed this writ petition complaining that his probation has not been declared yet. 2. According to the petitioner, he was promoted to the post of Asst. Executive Engineer in April, 2006. He has completed the period of probation and no disciplinary proceedings are pending against him. Therefore, the respondents ought to have declared his probation. However, for no reason, his probation has not been declared. It is the further allegation of the petitioner that the probation of his juniors have been declared. The petitioner has already submitted Ext.P3 application, for the declaration of his probation in the prescribed form. He WP(C) NO. 24536 OF 2011 ..2.. seeks the issue of appropriate directions for the consideration and disposal of Ext.P3. 3. I have heard the learned Govt. Pleader also. 4. Since Ext.P3 is pending consideration of the 1st respondent, it is sufficient that this writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3. 5. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P3 in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE bka/-