IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 19131 of 2008 Between: Bokka Veera Raghavulu S/o Late Naguru Kalipatnam West Panchayat Mogalthur(M) West Godavari District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police Eluru,West Godavari District 2 The Circle Inspector Narsapur,West Godavari District 3 The Sub-Inspector of Police Station House Officer Mogalthur,Mogalthur(M) Narsapur Division,W.G District 4 Kadali Nageswara Rao S/o. Rammurthy Kalipatnam West Panchatyat Mogalthur(M) West Godavari District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1to 3 arresting the respondent No.4 without considering the complaint submitted by the petitioner as illegal arbitary and violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Article 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.1 to 3 to initiate action against the respondents No.4. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.RAMA MOHAN PALANKI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.19131 of 2008 ORDER: The only grievance of the petitioner is that though his mother lodged a complaint against the 4th respondent-Kadali Nageswar Rao before the Sub-Inspector of Police, Mogalthuru, which was registered as Crime No.162 of 2008 for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 323 IPC, the same is not being investigated into by the official respondents and the 4th respondent is not being arrested so far. It is suffice to notice from the counter-affidavit filed by the 2nd respondent-Inspector of Police, Narsapur Circle, West Godavari District, that the 4th respondent herein, against whom the mother of the petitioner lodged a complaint, was arrested, but since he obtained anticipatory bail from this Court in Criminal Petition No.6069 of 2008, dated 26.09.2008, he was released on Station Bail on 30.09.2008. It is further stated in the counter affidavit that the investigation in Crime No.162 of 2008, which was registered on the complaint lodged by the mother of the petitioner, is completed and a charge sheet has been filed before the competent Court and the same is yet to be taken on file. In view of the averments made in the counter affidavit, nothing survives for further adjudication and the writ petition is liable to be closed. The writ petition is, accordingly, closed. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU,J 10.12.2008 v v