IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.21619 of 2010 Date of Decision : December 06, 2010. Raj Kaur and another .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Ms.Deepa Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This writ petition is an outcome of a matrimonial dispute between respondent No.5 and his wife, namely, respondent No.4. The petitioners are the parents of respondent No.5. They allege that the presence of respondent No.4 in their house is endangering their life and liberty. Having gone through the documents on record and the trial Court orders, I am of the considered view that no direction, as prayed for by the petitioners, deserves to be issued by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction. However, it appears desirable and expedient that the unfortunate matrimonial dispute resolved amicably. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the C.W.P.No .21619 of 2010 2 Mediation and Conciliation Centre at Kapurthala. The learned District and Sessions Judge, Kapurthala shall make an endeavour to ensure that a trained Mediator/Conciliator, may be a judicial officer, calls upon the parties and take necessary initiative/steps for the desired resolution. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. December 06, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE