IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16786 of 2009 LALTU YADAV @ VIVEK YADAV @ DILKHUSH YADAV @ CHHOTU YADAV, SON OF BHOL YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BIRCNAHIYA P.S. BARHARA, DISTRICT PURNEA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 28.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under Section 364A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that petitioner has been implicated in this case on the confessional statement of co-accused Binod Sah who has been allowed bail by this court vide order dated 27.09.2005 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 34494 of 2005. It is further submitted that victim, Udit Raza in his confessional statement under Section 161 Cr. P.C did not name the petitioner as one of the kidnapper. Petitioner is in custody for about a year. Learned counsel for the State is not in a position to refute the above submissions made on behalf of the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Banmankhi (Janki Nagar) P.S. Case No. 02 of 2005. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)