IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25886 of 2009 RADHE KAHAR @ RADHE RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 02.09.2009 Heard. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case which are mentioned in the earlier rejection order, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, specially when the trial judge has made quite some substantial efforts in examining the witnesses. Two public witnesses and two official witnesses like the IO and the doctor are submitted to be left for their examination whereas rejection order indicates that only IO and the doctor were the witnesses who were to be examined in the case. I direct the court below, i.e., Additional Sessions Judge, FTC IV, Jehanabad to take steps by exercising all the powers which have been vested into it for ensuring the production of witnesses before it and conclude the trial of S.T. No. 217 of 2006/ 221 of 2008 arising out of Ghoshi P.S. Case No. 110 of 2004 by the first quarter of 2010 else to release the petitioner above named on bail on execution of a bond to its own satisfaction. The petition is dismissed with the aforesaid observation/direction. Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)