HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA Contempt Case No.197 of 2011 Date: 21-7-2011 Between Mohd. Abdul Gani … Petitioner/Petitioner No.1 and Sri K.Laxman Babu, Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Karimnagar and another … Respondents/Respondents 3 and 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA Contempt Case No.197 of 2011 Order: This contempt case is filed seeking to punish the respondents herein for the willful and deliberate violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.31176 of 2010 in W.P.No.24352 of 2010 dated 01-10-2010. 2. The petitioner herein along with another has filed the main writ petition seeking to declare the inaction on the part of the respondents 1 to 5 in considering and implementing the proceedings No.B/2025/09 dated 25-8-2010 of the 4th respondent as arbitrary and illegal. Along with the main writ petition, they have also filed the present miscellaneous petition seeking to direct the 4th respondent to implement the orders in proceedings No.B/2025/09 dated 25-8-2010 passed by him and stop the quarrying/crushing operations that are being carried on by the respondents 7 to 13 in the lands in Survey No.411 situated at Begumpet village, Kamanpur Mandal, Karimnagar district, pending disposal of the main writ petition. This Court by order dated 01-10-2010 passed the following order in the said miscellaneous petition: “A perusal of the proceedings dated 25-8-2010 and the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition show that due to the allowing of mining operations and stone crushing operation, the petitioners and other villagers of Begumpet village are facing difficulty such as air and water pollution, and that the crushers are established less than 800 metres, which is contrary to the guidelines of the Pollution Control Board. In the circumstances, there shall be interim direction as prayed for.” 3. For the alleged violation of the aforesaid orders, the present contempt case is filed by the petitioner seeking to punish the respondents herein, who are the respondents 3 and 4 in the main writ petition. 4. Counter affidavits are filed by the respondents herein stating that in view of the proceedings initiated by the then Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate, Kamanpur under Section 133 of Cr.P.C., the respondents 7 to 13 in the main writ petition have filed criminal revision cases before this Court and obtained interim orders and in view of the said interim orders, they are unable to implement the orders passed by this Court in the miscellaneous petition. 5. According to the learned counsel for the contempt petitioner, already the said criminal revision cases are listed for hearing. 6. Under the circumstances, there is no contempt in this matter. The petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies in the main writ petition. 7. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J. 21st July, 2011. Ak HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA Contempt Case No.197 of 2011 21st July, 2011. (Ak)