IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC No. 269 of 2010. Decided on: 11th November, 2010. Ramesh Chand. …Petitioner. -Versus- Bharat Khera and another. .…Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents fairly submits that pursuant to the judgment dated 06.04.2010, rendered in CWP(T) No. 5654 of 2008, the petitioner has been reinstated. So far as monetary benefits are concerned, taking into consideration the fact that there is some genuine financial difficulty faced by the respondent-Corporation, the same are directed to be released in two installments, i.e., one before 31st March, 2011 and the second in the month of July, 2011. 2. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge November 11, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - - 3 -