IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 8676 of 2008. Decided on 17th March, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Surat Ram Sain. …Petitioner. -Versus- The State of H.P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. P.P. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of, having become infructuous. However, since the petitioner belongs to lowest starta of the society, in case he is still aggrieved, he is at absolute liberty to approach this Court for the redressal of his grievance. Copy dasti, on usual terms. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge March 17, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - - 3 - `