1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.605 OF 2009 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.740 OF 2008 Mr.Arif Usman Mithaiwala ...Applicant. v. Mr.Mohd. Hani Baray & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.R.S.Khadapkar, adv., for the Applicant. Mr. Vibhav Krishna i/by Juris Consillis, advs., for the respondents. CORAM : J.H.Bhatia, J. DATE : 15th October, 2010 P.C.: 1 Present applicant was the original plaintiff in S.C.Suit No. 8942 of 2007. It was representative suit filed under Order 1 Rule 8. Defendant nos.6 and 7, who supported the plaintiff’s claim, were impleaded on their request. Against the order passed in Notice of Motion, they have preferred Appeal From Order No.740 of 2008 challenging that order in the appeal. Original plaintiff, whom they were actually supporting, is shown as respondent. Said plaintiff by this application wants himself to be transposed as appellant. 2 In view of the circumstances, application is allowed and the applicant, who is shown respondent no.1 in the Appeal From Order No.740 of 2008 be transposed as the appellant no.3. Amendment be 2 effected within two weeks. (J.H.BHATIA, J.)