1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 4688 OF 2007 (Sardar Amarjeetsingh Makad .v. Mir Rizwaan Ali and another) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri S.P. Dharmadhikari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Habibuddin Ahmed, Advocate for the respondent No.1. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. 31ST JANUARY, 2008. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner does not press the present petition. The petitioner, however, submits that taking into consideration the difficulties of the petitioner, the petitioner be granted some period to vacate the premises. I find that the said request is reasonable. The petitioner, therefore, stands dismissed for want of prosecution. The petitioner has placed on record an undertaking, which is marked as “X” for identification. The petitioner has undertaken that he shall vacate the premises on or prior to 31st July, 2008 and 2 shall handover peaceful and vacant possession of the same to the respondent No.1 on or prior to the said date. An undertaking is also given that the delivery of the vacant premises would be without any encumbrances and also would be free from any impediment which might create hindrance for the respondent from taking vacant peaceful possession of the suit property. The said undertaking is accepted. It is, therefore, made clear that the petitioner will not be evicted from the suit premises till 31st July, 2008. However, the petitioner, in any event, shall handover the peaceful and vacant possession to the respondent No.1 on or prior to 31st July, 2008 without creating any hindrance. JUDGE *rrg.