IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 695 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 25, 2011 Rakesh Kumar. …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. R.A. Sheoran, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State. Mr. Sunil Bhoria, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that since driver-accused was not identified by the prosecution witness before the learned Trial Court, hence, acquittal by the learned Trial Court seems to be justified, therefore, he does not want to proceed with the revision petition and same may be dismissed as withdrawn. Present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. January 25, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge