1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1358 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.234 OF 2006 Santosh Haridas Bhandwalkar .. Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.Ashok M. Joshi, advocate, for applicant Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, A.P.P, for the State CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE : 6TH MAY, 2008 P.C. . The applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. During the trial he was not on bail. This appeal was preferred in the year 2006 against the Judgment of the Sessions Court which found the appellant guilty of the offence charged. 2 2. The learned counsel for the applicant contends that the case is based on the circumstantial evidence and there are doubts as to the involvement of the applicant. 3. From the Judgment we find that there are nail marks on the neck of the deceased. The internal injuries discloses that deceased died due to Asphyxia due to throttling. Apart from that there is evidence to show that the accused had suffered injuries by way of bite marks. 4. In these circumstances, in our opinion, no case is made out for grant of bail. Application for bail is rejected. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)