THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.574 of 2004 ORDER: The 1st petitioner is working as a Teacher in the 2nd petitioner Institution, which is admitted to grant-in-aid. It is stated that a vacancy, which is admitted to grant-in-aid, has fallen vacant and though proposals were submitted by the 2nd petitioner for absorption of the 1st petitioner against the same, the request is not being considered. Reference is made to the rules framed by the Government through various G.Os. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. Necessity by this Court to discuss the matter in detail as to the eligibility of the 1st petitioner to absorb against an aided vacancy is obviated on account of the fact that the Government imposed ban on appointment of teachers against aided vacancies in private institutions. As long as the ban continues, no relief can be granted to the 1st petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is closed, leaving it open to the 1st petitioner to work out his remedies as and when the ban is lifted or set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 23-09-2010 Prv