IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 19183 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION: November 18, 2008 Rakesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus Chandigarh Administration and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mr.Ashok Sehgal, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The prayer made in the instant petition filed Article 226 of the Constitution is for quashing order dated 3.1.2005 (P-2) passed by the Additional Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh exercising the powers of the Estate Officer, U.T. Chandigarh, and order dated 20.4.2006 (P-4) passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate (E), exercising the powers of Estate Officer under the Public Premises (Eviction of Un-authorised Occupants) Act, 1971. The impugned orders have been passed because the petitioner after having been allotted the Built-up Booth No. 5 (with basement), Mauli Jagran, U.T. C.W.P. No. 19183 of 2008 Chandigarh, has not been able to deposit the instalments. As a consequence, the allotment was cancelled vide order dated 3.1.2005 (P-2) and eviction order thereafter was passed on 20.4.2006 (P-4). 2. When the matter came up for consideration on 10.11.2008 we put the petitioner to terms and he undertook to deposit Rs. 15,00,000/- with the Registrar of this Court on or before 17.11.2008 i.e. yesterday and in the meanwhile his dispossession was stayed. The office report shows and the same is conceded by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the amount has not been deposited as per the order dated 10.11.2008. The bonafide of the petitioner is doubtful. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (JORA SINGH) November 18, 2008 JUDGE Pkapoor 2