IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 476 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Smt. Hadishan w/o Shri abdul Mazid, 2. Smt. Sabrun Nisha w/o Shri Khurshid. 3. Islamuddin s/o Shri Abdul Mazid All R/o Mehuwala Mafi, Police Station Patel Nagar, District Dehradun …… Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Senior Supdt. of Police, Dehradun, District Dehradun. 2. Station House Officer, Police Station Patel Nagar, District Dehradun. 3. Shri Mustaq s/o Shri Ajimuddin R/o Mehuwala Police Station Patel Nagar, District Dehradun ….. Respondents Sri A.M. Saklani, Advocate on behalf of Sri Sandeep Tandon, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri D.K. Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. Sri P.S.Danu, Advocate for respondent no. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon. Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Sri A.M. Saklani, , Advocate on behalf of Sri Sandeep Tandon, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri D.K. Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. Sri P.S.Danu, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Sri D.K.Sharma, the learned Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of the first information report and the case registered against them, now, has become infructuous as the police after the completion of the investigation has filed charge-sheet against the petitioners before the concerning Magistrate. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. With the above order, CLMA No. 6324 of 2006 stands disposed of. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J 25.05.2006 25.05.2006 A