IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-14182 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: September 19, 2011 Ravinder Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Registrar of Companies & another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Shekhar Verma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Hooda, Advocate, for respondent No.1. None for respondent Nos.2 and 3. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. prays for quashing complaint No.32 dated 9.5.2006 (Annexure P-1) under Section 58-A(2), (a) & (c), (3A) and 4 of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Rules 3(1A) and 10 of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 (for short, ‘Rules’); and summoning order dated 9.5.2006 (Annexure P-2). Crl. Misc. No. M-14182 of 2011 [2] 2. In view of judgment of even date rendered in Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-8513 of 2011 titled ‘Kanwar Deep Singh & another vs. Registrar of Companies & another’, this petition is disposed of. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 states that the petitioner has not appeared before the Court till date. 4. So as to maintain the dignity of the Court and considering the fact that order of summoning was passed on 9.5.2006, the petitioner is directed to appear in the Trial Court within three weeks from today. 5. It is only after putting in appearance and releasing on bail, that the petitioner would be at liberty to seek exemption from personal appearance from the Trial Court. (AJAI LAMBA) September 19, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?