IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 748 of 2006 (M/B) Vinod Kumar S/o Tota Singh, Working as Patwari Khetra Rampura, Tehsil Kiccha, District Udham Singh Nagar……….. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Senior Superintendent of Police, District Udham Singh Nagar. 2. Station House Officer, Police Station Kiccha, District Udham Singh Nagar. 3. Sri Anil Singh Garbyal, Tehsildar, Kiccha, District Udham Singh Nagar. ……. Respondents Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent No. 3. JUDGEMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent No. 3. 2. Mr. M.A. Khan, the learned State Counsel submits that the writ petition filed by petitioner Vinod Kumar seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him, now, has become infructuous, as the Police, after the completion of the investigation, has filed charge sheet against the petitioner before the concerning court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. With the above order, CLMA No. 8601 of 2006 also stands dismissed as infructuous. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 12.09.2006 12.09.2006 G