IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 19288 of 2009 Between: Mahaveer Nagar Welfare Association (Regd. No.5054/97) represented by its General Secretary P.Srinivasa Rao S/o. Anjaiah R/o.H.No.12-2-396/A/29, Mahaveernagar Colony, Markandeya Nagar, Karwan, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. 2The Joint Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. 3Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad Division, Hyderabad. 4Mohd. Ahmadullah Khan S/o.Mohd. Kaleemullah Khan R/o.H.No.18-7-196/B/78, Amanagar, Talabkatta, Karawan, Hyderabad. 5Mohd. Noorullah Khan S/o.Mohd. Kaleemullah Khan R/o.H.No.18-7-196/B/78, Amanagar, Talabkatta, Karawan, Hyderabad. 6Mohd. Azamkhan S/o.Mohd. Ghani Khan R/o.H.No.16-1027/105/7/A, Reddy Complex, Malakpet, Hyderabad. 7Smt.Shareefa Zubeida W/o.Late Habeeb Idroot, R/o.H.No.20-5-60/51/1, Quazipura, Hyderabad. 8Sri Ganesh Singh S/o.Late Balaji Singh R/o.H.No.12-2-389/1, Karwan, Hyderabad. 9Sri Anand Singh S/o.Late Balaji Singh R/o.H.No.12-2-389/1, Karwan, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.1 & 2 in issuing the impugned Endorsement Memo in Rc.No.7370/03 dt. 20.6.09 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of A.P. (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act 1955 and rules made there under and consequently set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.A.CHAYA DEVI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 19288 of 2009 O R D E R: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission accorded. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU. Date: 18-11-2009. MVB.