Civil Revision No. 1447 of 2009 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1447 of 2009 Date of decision: 18.03.2009. Piara Lal ....Petitioner Versus Natha Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Anuj Kohli, Advocate, for the petitioners ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The plaintiff-petitioner herein had filed a suit against his two siblings for the possession of ½ share of a part of the house under reference. The trial proceeded for quite some time when the petitioner herein filed a plea under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. for impleadings his two real sisters as party. The plea, raised in support thereof, that they had been inadvertently left out from the suit. The learned Trial Court declined the plea by noticing that the plaintiff-petitioner had not been able to explain the delay in filing of plea aforementioned inspite of the fact that the maintainability of the suit itself had already been challenged in account of non joinder of two real sisters of the plaintiff-petitioner. It noticed, in the impugned order itself, that the plaintiff- Civil Revision No. 1447 of 2009 -2- **** petitioner had based the claim in the suit “ on the basis of previous judgment and decree”. It further noticed that the two real sisters proposed to be impleaded were not parties to the “previous judgment and decree.” The two counts noticed by the learned Trial Court in negativing the plea aforementioned are self contained and sustainable in character. I affirm the view obtained and the reasoning noticed in support thereof. Dismissed in limine. March 18, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge