==3f ijjiastt' !«?) L •^ ^s^' IN TME HIGH CCUaT OF OIHArTI SG/tfUI ./ff.BJ.L.SSPUrt Misc.4ppeal No._.^2:l_ of 2003. JS'FQ.C^T: PI.tfffNTIFF S •^-"•^hri Yadunath Gaushala Kawardha ''^.- s..~{^ "through Secretary, Atroanand Gupta /-"'./•^y ^. ^s^-' ^••^^ cX*^^.--''' ^\'^7tf> ^-•- .^®'-" ^ • ' ..»,SV'~ ~^^ o'»v !\ ;^ <i> RcS'QNDEMTS IMFENDENTS' Son of Shri Gaj aram Gupta aged 50 years, Resident of '/illage Guptapara Kawardha, Tahsil & District Kawardha (C.G.)^ YE R,S U S ; ., .1. Lakhan aged 60 years son of Surit Gond Resident 'of Lalpur P.H.Mo.33 Than & Tahsil & Distract Kavvardha. 2. Sukhraji aged 50 years son of ^' s" Dhursingh Sahu Resident of Singhanpuri. /-'3« Ivtangal 'aged 55 years son of Mukhi Gond, Village Lalpur, Tahsil & District Kavi'ardha. .^' ^' ,4«' Kajelal aged 40 years son of Ikkalram Yadav Village Lalpur, Thana 8. Tahsil & Dis-fcrict Kawardha< ,5. Baishakhu ag'ed 50 years, son of Kuv/arsingh Sahu Village Lalpur, Thana & Tah.& Distri.et Kawardha. 6. Ramnath P'atel. aged 55 years son of Scnot knov.n Village Lalgur Thana & Tah.S. District Kawardha. •:'.L~^ ::•"'^-'^^^Z^^T^i5^^^' i, , , .^.^—!t^.--E-rK?r's:TTCT;ssl »:3l!lBi ^" 7. Ramcharan aged 40 years, son of Sahgu Rawat Village Lalpur, Thana & Tah. & District Kawardha. 8. Shiv aged 35 years son of Aghjiu Rawat Resident of Lalour Thana & Tah. & District Kawardha. 9-o-Kri-fcram aged 45 years son of Sadal Saliu Vi-llage Lalpur, Tah.S. Dis-trict Kawardha. lO". Chintaram aged 40 years, son of Raj au Sahu Village Lalpur Thana & Tah.& Distriet Kawardha. 11. San'fceram aged 40 years son of Baldu Gond Vlllage Taro, Tah.S, District Kavi-ardha. J.2. Kartik aged 40 years son of Sitaram /' Pali Village Taro Tahsil & District Kawardha. ,.,3.3. Rani Shashi B'rabha Devi aged 60 years / 'uife of Shriman Rajasahab Vishwaraj Singh Ji M.ahraj , Kav/ardha,Tah.& District Kawardha. ..-•14. State of Chhattisgarh-through Colle.ctbr,Kawardha (C.G.) ./•' ^I^^U^^L^3EiL^--HiI£^J-^L£L-coDE-^L^11^^ROCEa^ ^''^>^^ C^y ^.0 ftfiing aggrievfed vvith the orderdated'53. 12.2002 ^^" passed by^Shri S.L.Chakradhari .pivil Judge Class II ^^•'" p Kawardha in Civil sui'fcyNo.28 A o^ 2002 between Shri Yadunath Gaushala Versus Lak'han'-and others, ordering return of plaint - 3 - XI-HC-22 ai^sw fq^ o-t^%( s^'-ti^? «^.% r^ ''•'1. W,'''WSWf(.93W , WWffilRSRBM^^' <%7^^?3' ••^ 296 3^^s?«tlq^ 23.4.2003 It is pouited out bj withdrawn by the leam< libert^.' to avail alteniative) However, in the inadverfently typed that CivU Prdcedure Code n1 1/7/2002, com-isel for th| revision with libei'ty to fil^ writ or appeal, Therefore, the case i| ShriH.B. Agrawal He submits that 31/3/2003 has been tyrj 31/3/2003 may be recaj withdraw this appeal wittj Having thus considt scalled and the present| wlth llbem' to avail alteril J'- the office that this appeal was jd counsel for fhe appellant with jremedy. Eorder dated 31/3/2003, it is tn view of ttie new amendment In |ade appltcablfi wiih effect from. applicant wants to withdraw the appropriate proceedings includini «>l'!l(»a(«i«t(*i«51t'1^8tfil'8gl( V^msSv relisted todav. ' a^pears for the appeUant. inadvertently the order dated ;d; He submits that order dated lled aiid -he inav be peiinitted to libertv to avail altemative reniedv. |red, the order dated 31/3/2003 is iappeal is dismissed as wifhdrawn ritattye remedy. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge S [T^^^r^ ^. ^4^