IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6579 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.6579 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.6579 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1875 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.1875 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.1875 OF 2005 Pravin Vishram Thorat. ... Applicant. Versus. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Ms.Pooja Bhojane i/by Shri Nitin Sejpal for the Applicant. Shri K.V.Saste, A.P.P.for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. : ABHAY S. OKA, J. : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 11th October, 2005. : 11th October, 2005. : 11th October, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The learned Advocate for the Applicant invited my attention to the order dated 31st March 2005 passed in Criminal Application No.1875 of 2005 and pointed out that the trial has not been concluded as directed by this Court. The learned Advocate pointed out that the Applicant is not pressing this application on merits at this stage and direction may be given for expeditious conclusion of trial. 3. Hence the Application is dismissed as not pressed. The learned trial Judge will ensure that the trial is concluded expeditiously as time fixed by this Court for conclusion of the trial appears to have expired. Judge. Judge. Judge.