IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19569 of 2010 1. MOTI LAL SAH 2. Surendra Sah 3. Sachin Sah @ Sachindar Sah 4. Nanhak Sah 5. Rinku Sah 6. Tinku Sah 7. Chanu Sah @ Channu Sah Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 02.08.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application of petitioner no.1 inasmuch as during the pendency of the application he has been arrested. Such permission is granted. Accordingly, the application of petitioner no.1 is dismissed as withdrawn. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. There is case and counter case for the incident of the same day. Offence regarding committing theft is said super addition. For the offence under Section 3 (I) (x) of the S.C./S.T. (prevention of atrocities) Act, it is said that allegation is not constituting any such offence. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within 2 one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 16 of 2010, above named petitioners no. 2 to 7 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Motihari, East Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)