IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2011 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 9404 of 2011(A) ------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. AJITH.S., AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.RAMACHANDRAN, REVATHI, PAYYAPPADY P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 034. 2. KRISHNA KUMARAN THAMPI, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.V.T.DINAKARAN, GEETHA BHAVAN, PUZHAVATHU, CHANGANACHERRY- 686 101. 3. NADASHA S., PARAMBIL HOUSE, SABARI, SOUTH NALUVAZHI, NORTH PARAVOOR-683 513. 4. SHABI SATHYAN P, JANAKI NIVAS, CHAMRAVATTOM P.O., TIRUR, MALAPPURAM-673 610. 5. MERLY MATHEW KUNNIRICKAL, C/O.SHAJI PHILIP, NADAYIL HOUSE, NEELMPEROOR P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 534. 6. D.KALPANA, T-1, SANKRITI PRANGAN, BABANAGAR, NACHARAM, SECONDRABAD, ANDHRA PRADESH- 500 076. 7. HARIKRISHNAN.S., PALAMUTTATHU MELETHIL, KODUMON P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA-691 553. 8. SOUMYA.S., SIVASAILAM, T.C.18/745(4), KRA 137, KONKALAM, ARANADA P.O., TRIVANDRUM-695 032. 9. ANU ROSE MANI,D/O.MANI J.VARIKKAPPALLIL, VARIKKAPPALLIL HOUSE, AMALAGIRI P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 561. BY ADV. SRI.S.K.AJAY KUMAR SMT.PRIYA. H. WP(C).No. 9404 of 2011(A) RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR-686560. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM- 686 560. BY SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.9404 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioners are students of Management and Technology Course. When the result of the 4th Semester examination was declared, they had failed in certain papers. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE vgs