..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.703 OF 2007 1.Asif Yousuf Shaikh, 2.Sachin Laxman Bhujbal, 3.Yogesh Narayan Bhujbal, & 4.Sagar @ Pappu Suresh Bhujbal. ...Applicants. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.V.B.Tapkir, Adv. for the Applicants. Mr.Rajesh More, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 22nd March, 2007. DATED : 22nd March, 2007. DATED : 22nd March, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants-orig.accused and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking bail in C.R.No.529 of 2006 of Hadapsar Police Station, Pune. The said C.R. is under Sections 143, 148, 149, 307, 324, 504 and 427 of IPC. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicants states that as far as applicant Nos.1,3 & 4 are concerned, he is not pressing this application at ..(2).. this stage and seeks liberty to prefer a fresh application after annexing relevant documents. Liberty as prayed for is granted. 4. Thus, this application is being considered only in respect of applicant No.2 Sachin Laxman Bhujbal. 5. As far as applicant No.2 Sachin Laxman Bhujbal is concerned, the complainant has not named him in the FIR, nor is there any test identification parade in respect of applicant No.2. 6. In this view of the matter, I am inclined to grant bail to applicant No.2 only. 7. Applicant No.2 Sachin Laxman Bhujbal to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.20,000/-with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant shall report to Hadapsar Police Station, Pune once in a week. 8. Application is disposed of accordingly. ..(3).. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)