IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8680 of 2011 PRAKASH YADAV S/O MEGHAN YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 302, 379, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act. Considering that the petitioner is named in the First Information Report as merely a member of mob and one of the prosecution witness supported the case of the prosecution, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-II, Jamui in connection with S.T. No. 318/10 arising out of Jhajha P.S. Case No. 225/2008, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailors shall 2 be the brother in law of the petitioner namely Subhash Yadav. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)