1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:20.10.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Crl.O.P No.11746 of 2011 V.Perumal ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent, Trichy. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thuraiyur Police Station, Trichy District. 3.Ravi ... Respondents Prayer:This petition is preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C to direct the respondents 1 & 2 to give police protection to the petitioner and his family members and their life, personal liberty and take proper action against the 3rd respondent in accordance with law upon the complaint preferred by the petitioner to the 1st respondent dated 16.08.2010. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mrs.Prabha Govt. Advocate(Crl.Side) ORDER Seeking a direction to give police protection to the petitioner and his family members and their life, personal liberty and take proper action against the 3rd respondent in accordance with law upon the complaint preferred by the petitioner to the 1st respondent dated 16.08.2010, the petitioner has come up with the present petition. 2.From the typed set of papers, it is seen that it is a matter of civil dispute. The grievance of the petitioner is that in respect of a house property, the third respondent has threatened the petitioner and his family with dire consequences. Even though he preferred a complaint before the second respondent, there is no proper action. He also again approached the first respondent for taking action against the third respondent. In spite of that, there is no action. Hence, he approached this Court for the relief as prayed for. 3.In my considered opinion, since there appears to be some dispute regarding immovable property, under Section 482 Cr.P.C, a direction for enjoying the said property cannot be granted at all. The remedy for the petitioner lies elsewhere either before the civil court or in any other https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 manner known to law. In view of all these reasons, I do not find any reason to issue a direction. Hence this petition deserves to be dismissed. 4.Accordingly, this petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to seek his remedy in the manner known to law. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (A.S) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (C.S) To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thuraiyur Police Station, Trichy District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. + 1 cc to M/s.N.Sankar Ganesh, Advocate, SR No.36270 Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11746 of 2011 20.10.2011 vs RJ/8.11.11 2p/5c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/