IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.56665 of 2007 QUAIYUM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 19.5.2008 Heard. The petitioner has approached this Court for grant of anticipatory bail in a case instituted under sections 399 and 402 IPC and section ¾ of the Explosives Substance Act. It is submitted that neither the petitioner is named in the FIR nor any incriminating material has been collected indicating his involvement. From the impugned order, it appears that after sometime one of the accused made a confessional statement in which he named the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is delay in lodging the FIR which is not explained. It has further been submitted that this petitioner has a very clean antecedents. Having considered the fact that the petitioner is not even named in the FIR, this Court is inclined to admit the petitioner to bail. In the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, the petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the - 2 - like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Kishanganj in Dighalbank p.s.case no.27/2007, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. HR ( Kishore K. Mandal )