IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.26466 of 2009 in Crl. M. No.6046-M of 2010 Date of Decision:20.5.2010 Balwinder Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Jaswant Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. Crl. M. No.26466 of 2010 Heard. The application is allowed and the Zimni Orders passed by the learned Trial Court (Annexure A) is taken on record. Crl. M. No.6046-M of 2010 The present petitioner is seeking regular bail in case FIR No.235 dated 2.8.2008 registered under Sections 302/34 IPC at Police Station City, District Kaputhala. As per the allegation in the FIR, the petitioner was last seen with the deceased and he had the knowledge that the deceased was carrying huge money with him. Learned counsel for the State on instructions further states that there is evidence to show that the petitioner brought the vehicle of the deceased to his house in which the deceased was lying in unconscious condition. After leaving the car of the deceased in that condition, he fled away from the place. Crl. M. No.26466 of 2009 in -2- Crl. M. No.6046-M of 2010 It is stated that two prosecution witnesses have been examined and only nine witnesses are yet to be examined. Now the next date before the trial Court is 24.5.2010 for further prosecution evidence. No ground for bail is made out. Dismissed. However, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within 6 months. 20.5.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE