IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.375 of 2009 Date of decision:25.03.2009. Munesh Devi and another ...Petitioners Versus Gyasi Ram and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Ms. Monisha Lamba, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Parasher, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that, as per her instructions, the entire area which was in possession of the respondent – plaintiff has since been sold out by him vide sale deed dated 5.11.2007. Learned counsel for the respondent – plaintiff contests the correctness of that factual averment. However, learned counsel for the parties otherwise agree that this petition may be disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Court to dispose of the suit itself by or on 15.07.2009. In the light thereof, the petition shall stand disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Court to dispose of the suit itself by or on 15.07.2009, during which time both the parties shall be afforded equal number of opportunities for adducing their evidence. If any party is inclined to summon any official witness, it shall be entitled to take dasti summons but the non return or non-effecting of service thereof would not entitle that party to ask for any further adjournment. Till the disposal of the suit by the aforementioned date, the parties shall observe status quo qua possession of the property in suit. The acknowledgment (of a copy of this order) issued by the concerned Judicial Officer shall be forwarded to the Registry of this Court. Learned District Judge shall himself maintain a tab to ensure that the case is disposed of by aforementioned date. Disposed of accordingly. March 25, 2009 (S.D.Anand) vinod Judge