IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 9TH OCTOBER 2007 / 17TH ASWINA 1929 CRP.No. 890 of 2007() --------------------- EA 72/07 in EP 41/05 in RCOP.22/2001 of MUN-MAGI COURT, PARAVOOR .................... REVN. PETITIONER: PETITIONER/CLIMANT ------------------------------------ SUMA.G.NAIR,D/O. GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI SUMA BUILDINGS, PARAVOOR,NOW RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 206, ULSOOR, BANGALORE-8 BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SURESH (CHIRAKKARA) RESPONDENTS:RESPONDENTS/ DECREE HOLDER -------------------------- 1. REMESH GOPAL, S/O. NAZEEMA, SUNIL NILAYAM, KURUMANDAL, PARAVOOR. 2. RAJANI GOPAL.DO..DO.. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/JUDGMENT DEBTOR: 3. SREEDHARAN NAIR,S/O. NANU PILLAI THOTTUVATTU VEEDU, KURUMANDAL, PARAVOOR. 4. SURESH,S/O.GOPALAKRISHANA PILLAI NOW EMPLOYED AT PUB WATER WORKS SEUDAS POST, JPHORE,WEST MALASYIA, RESIDING AT 8-9, BUKITYAMA 6TH MILE ROAD, MALAYSIA-10 5. SUNDARESH GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI. DO.DO... THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.Krishnan, J. ======================== C.R.P.No.890 of 2007 ======================== Dated this the 9th day of October, 2007. ORDER This revision is preferred against the order of the Munsiff, Paravoor whereby he had dismissed an application for staying the execution of the order in R.C.O.P.No.22 of 2001. He moved a claim application and that has been dismissed. It is submitted that another suit is pending. This is a very strange case where one of the landlords moves the court for staying delivery of the property from the tenant. Therefore, at this stage, I do not want to interfere with the matter and no circumstances exist to grant stay. Therefore the court below was right in holding that the stay petition has to be dismissed. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. M.N.Krishnan, Judge. ess 10/10