THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Tr.C.M.P. No.119 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner is the wife of the respondent. Their marriage took place in the year 2005 at Hyderabad. They lived for a short period at Kurnool. On account of differences that have arisen between them, the petitioner had come back to the house of her parents. On a complaint submitted by her, under Section 498-A I.P.C., C.C.No.515 of 2009 was registered in the Court of XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad. She has also filed M.C.No.276 of 2009 in the Court of Additional Judge, Family Court, Nampally, Hyderabad, and D.V.C.No.17 of 2011 in the Court of IV Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad. The respondent filed F.C.O.P.No.10 of 2011 in the Family Court, Kurnool, under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner prays for transfer of the F.C.O.P.No.10 of 2011 to the Family Court at Hyderabad. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Though the respondent is served with the notice, he has not chosen to enter appearance. On account of sharp differences between the parties, several proceedings came to be instituted. As many as three cases are pending in different Courts at Hyderabad, and the respondent is defending himself in those cases. For all practical purposes, the petitioner is stranger to Kurnool, and it would not be proper to require her to attend the Court at that place. No prejudice or hardship would be caused to the respondent, in case the F.C.O.P.No.10 of 2011 is transferred to the Family Court at Hyderabad. Hence, the Tr.C.M.P. is allowed, and F.C.O.P.No.10 of 2011 is transferred from the Family Court, Kurnool, to the Additional Family Court, at Nampally, Hyderabad, and on such transfer, it shall be heard along with M.C.No.276 of 2009. The learned Family Judge, Kurnool shall put the respondent on notice, before dispatching the record. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.08-06-2011. KO