- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICATION NO.391 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.391 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.391 OF 2005 S.S.Jambnekar ...Petitioner vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.H.V.Kode for the Petitioner Mr.Rajesh More, A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : AUGUST 21, 2006. : AUGUST 21, 2006. : AUGUST 21, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Revision Application with liberty to file a Revision Application before the appropriate Sessions Court. He states that this Court may clarify that the bar of limitation should not come in the way of the Applicant. 2. Revision Application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. If the Petitioner prefers Revision Application before the Sessions Court and applies for condonation of delay, it is obvious that the Sessions Court will note that the present Revision Application was filed on 7th November 2005 in which notice before admission was issued by this Court on 9th March 2006 and this Revision Application remained pending till today. 3. Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE