IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 10382 of 1998 Between: Ch. Nalini Kumari D/o Ch. Subba Rao, St. Monica Public School, Guttalabegumpet, Serlingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Special Court under APL & Grabbing (Prohibition) Act A.P. Hyderabad 2 Krovvidi Narsimham S/o Late Venkatappa R/o 50/3RT, Vijayanagar Colony, Hyderabad 3 Serilingampally Municipality, rep by its Commissioner Serilingampally. ...RESPONDENTS) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to call for records relating to the order of the Special Court under A.P. Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, Hyderabad dated 24/2/1998, passed in L.G.C. No.9 of 1994 and L.G.C. No. 10 of 1994 and also decree in L.G.C. No.9 of 1994 and declare the same as illegal arbitrary without jurisdiction and perverse and quash the same by issuing Writ Order, or direction in the nature of Certiorari. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.SREERAMA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Mr.Hari Sridhar Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SC for Municipality The Court made the following : Order: ( Per Sri BRSR.J) The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant in LGC No.9 of 1994 Mr.Hari Sridhar seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the very LGC filed by him against the petitioner. Leave is accordingly granted. The LGC filed by Respondent No.2 against the petitioner shall stand dismissed as withdrawn. Leave is also accorded to respondent No.2 who is the applicant in LGC No.9 of 1994 to avail such remedies as may be available to him in law in which event the matter shall be disposed of on its own merits. The observations and findings recorded by the Special Court shall have no effect whatsoever on any of the proceedings to be initiated by the respondent. In the circumstances, the adjudication of this writ petition on merits is not required. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. (B.SUDERSHAN REDDY,J) Dated 05.10.2004 (K.C.BHANU,J) msv. .... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Special Court under A.P Land Grabbing (Prohibition Act) Hyderabad 2. 2CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of A.P. Hyd.(OUT) 3. 2CD copies