IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8280 of 2011 1. CHANDAN YADAV SON OF SUDHIR YADAV. 2. MUKUN MURARI YADAV @ MUKUN MURARI SON OF SUDHIR YADAV 3. SUDHIR YADAV SON OF LATE TARACHAND YADAV. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 06.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. There is a specific accusation against Chandan Yadav to have assaulted with axe. The only one grievous injury has been found. This Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner no. 1 (Chandan Yadav). Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of petitioner no.1 (Chandan Yadav) keeping in view that there is no allegation of blow and both sides are on litigating terms from before. So far as, petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are concerned. 2 Considering the fact that petitioners’ side earlier lodged a complaint case against the informant, let the above named petitioner nos. 2 and 3, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Korha (Rautara)P.S. Case No. 04 /2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)