IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1721 of 2009(M/S) Vijay Kumar Shah son of Sri Banshi Lal Shah resident of 18 Bara Bazar, Mallital, Nainital. ……Petitioner. Versus Nagar Palika Parishad, Nainital, through its Executive Officer and two others. …….Respondents. Sri K.S. Bora, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri D.S. Patni, Advocate for the respondent nos. 1 and 2. Sri K.P. Upadhyay, Additional C.S.C. for the respondent no. 3. Dated:-26.10.2009 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard Sri K. S. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri D.S. Patni, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Sri K.P. Upadhyay, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the respondent no. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in connection of his grievance. The grievance has been mentioned in the representation. On 13.10.2009, the respondent nos. 1 and 2 sought ten days time to seek instructions. On the basis of the instructions, counsel for the respondents has submitted that if the order is passed to decide the representation, he has no objection. The prayer is innocuous. The respondent no. 1 is directed to decide the representation dated 16.9.2008 (Annexure No. 8 to the writ petition), preferably within a period 2 of six weeks from the date of the production of the certified copy of this order. The petitioner shall enclose the copy of the representation dated 16.9.2008 along with the certified copy when it is presented to the officer concerned, i.e., respondent no. 1. With the said direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (All the pending applications stand disposed of accordingly.) (B.S.Verma, J.) 26.10.2009 RMY 3 4