HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No, 289/2011 APPUCANTS Appellants VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS Respondents 4. 7. 8. Appellant no. 5 Rukmani Bai widow of Late Shri Dattatrya. Vandra Bai wife of Shri Ashok Dixit, dailghter of Late Shri Dattatiya. Usha Tiwari wife of Shri Hiralal, daughter of late Shri Dattatrya. Manjulata wife of Shri Ramesb Kumar Mishra, daughter of Late Shri Dattatrya. All resident of Gram Gorakhpur, Tahsil Pendra Road, District Bilaspur(C.G.). . Rajeshwari daughter of Late Shri Digambar Prasad, aged about 37 years, resident ofJabalpur.. Surendra "Natha, son of Late Shri Digambar Prasad, aged about 27 years, resident of Nivasar Satna (M.P.). ^ ^ Rajendra Kumar Son of Late Shri Digambar Prasad, aged about 28 years. Shamboo Nath son of Late Shri Digambar Prasad, aged about 25 years, residerit of Umaria. Surendra Nath son of Late Shri Digambar Prasad, aged about 25 years, resident of Jatahari, Distriet Shahdol (M.P.). Jitendra Nath, Son of Late Shri Digambar Prasad, aged about 22 years, resident of Umaria, District Shah'dol (M.P.). Mahendra Nath Son of Late Shri Digambar Prasad, aged about 22 years, resident of Umaria, District Shahdol (M.P.). Ravindra Nath, son of Late Shri Digambar Prasad, aged about 28 years, resident of Umaria, District Shahdol (M.P.). Rajeev son of Late Dittatrya, R/o Gram Gorakhpur, Tahsil Pendra Road, District Bilaspur (C.G.j. & , .«• .j"1 1 ^s^::^^ 1 APPLICATIOIL FOR RESTORATION OF SECOND APPEAL N0. 1033/1999 THEREBY SETTING ASIDE ORDER DATED 18/11/2010 UNDER SECTION 151 OF C.P.C. (SB :Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:-. Shri Saifuddin Rajas, Advocate for the petitioners. Respondents not noticed. ORAL-_ORDI:R (Passedon 11/05/2011) -1. This is petition for restoration*.of Second Appeal No. 1033/ 1999. 2. Vide order dated 18/ 11/2010 in Second Appeal No. 1033/1999 learned counsel for the petitioners/appellants have withdrawn the second appeal by filing application for withdrawal. TKerefore, petition for restoration of second appeal is not maintainable. Consequently, petition for restoration is dismissed summarily. 3. All interim applications are also dismissed. 4. No order asto costs. ''I T.P. Sharma judge