IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.28032 of 2010 Between: Abdul Wahab ……PETITIONER(S) and Government of India rep. by its Secretary for Law, New Delhi and others ……RESPONDENT(S) THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.28032 of 2010 ORDER: Petitioner states that as respondent No.7 herein and two others have not taken any steps to demarcate his land even after general elections are over, he filed W.P.No.13263 of 2004 and this Court, by order dated 29.07.2004, directed respondent No.7 herein to inspect and demarcate his land within two months therefrom, after due notice to him. Subsequently, he filed W.P.No.4858 of 2006 seeking to direct the police to provide police aid to him in implementing the order of this Court dated 29.07.2004 in W.P.No.13263 of 2004. This Court, on 11.08.2006, granted interim directions to implement the order in W.P.No.13263 of 2004. Thereafter, on 05.10.2006, as per the directions of Deputy Director Survey Settlement and Land Records, respondent No.7 conducted panchanama and fixed boundaries in his land. Even after the boundaries have been fixed, the petitioner states that Dr.Prakash, his wife and their henchmen have been interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment over the said land. Therefore, he filed private complaint before the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Adilabad, which in turn was referred to respondent No.5 for investigation and report. It is the grievance of the petitioner that, after such reference, respondent No.5 registered a case in Crime No.203 of 2010, but however, he is not conducting investigation into the same and, instead giving police aid to the accused therein. Therefore, on 06.11.2010, he has submitted a representation to respondent No.8 bringing to his notice the said facts and seeking directions to respondent Nos.4 to 6 herein to conduct investigation in Crime No.203 of 2010 on the file of the 5th respondent. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleaders for Home, Revenue and General Administration, and Sri Ponnam Ashok Goud, learned Assistant Solicitor General. Since the representation of the petitioner dated 06.11.2010 is said to be pending before respondent No.8, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to respondent No.8 to consider the said representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders as per law, with respect to investigation of Crime No. 203 of 2010 on the file of the 5th respondent, if not already passed, within a period of four weeks from today. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. 12th November 2010 CVRK