1 Crim.Appln.No.3198/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3198 OF 2010 Shri Ajit Lakshmibhooshan Mehrishi ...Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondent Mr.Ganesh Gole for the Applicant. Mr.Dilip Killedar for Respondent No.2. Mrs.P.P. Bhosale, APP for the State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : JULY 30, 2010 P.C. :- 1 Heard Counsel for the applicant and Counsel for Respondent no.2. 2 Parties have applied for quashing the criminal complaint registered by respondent no.2 against the applicant for the offence punishable under Sections 279, 338 of the IPC. 2 Crim.Appln.No.3198/2010 3 It is submitted that both the parties have settled the dispute amicably and the respondent does not wish to pursue the said complaint. Respondent no.2 has filed an affidavit-in-reply in which he has stated that the complaint may be quashed. Respondent no.2 is present in the court and he has stated that he has no objection if the said complaint is quashed. 4 In view of the Apex Court judgments in the cases of 1) Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab, reported in AIR 2008 Supreme Court 1969, 2) Jagdish Chanana & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Anr., reported in AIR 2008 Supreme Court 1968 and 3) B.S. Joshi and others vs. State of Haryana and another, reported in 2003 Supreme Court 1386, there is no impediment for quashing the said complaint by consent. 3 Crim.Appln.No.3198/2010 5 In the result, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)