IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20247 of 2010 BRIJ NATH SHRIVASTAVA, SON OF RAMA NAND SHRIVASTAVA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 03.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 467, 469, 471, 414, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the petitioner was suspected to be a member of the vehicle-lifters gang and was dealing in stolen cars but the submission is that the petitioner has fair antecedents and there is no complaint about him in this regard. It is contended that the rightful owner of the said car was the brother of one of the occupants of the car and the same was released in his favour. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with three sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in Patna Kotwali P.S. Case No. 351 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the father/brother/wife of the petitioner and the third bailor shall be the local since the 2 petitioner belongs to the District of Gopalganj. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents will be verified by the Magistrate by calling for a report from the Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)