1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7731 OF 2008 Pradip Baburao Karadkar ..Petitioner. Vs. Zilla Parishad, Sangli ..Respondent. .... Mr. Umesh R. Mankapure for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. .... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 1st December, 2008. P.C. : The Industrial Court has declined to grant interim relief in respect of an order of suspension pending a disciplinary enquiry. Admittedly there is a power to suspend under Rule 3 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad, Zilla Service Discipline Appeal Rules, 1964. Since the order of suspension which was passed on 20th May, 2008, a charge sheet has also been issued to the Petitioner on 9th July, 2008. In these circumstances, the Industrial Court has furnished cogent reasons for declining to grant interim relief. No case for 2 intervention has been made out in the exercise of supervisory jurisdiction. The question as to whether there is victimization would have to be determined on the basis of the evidence which would be adduced at the trial of the complaint. The Petition is accordingly dismissed. *****