IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.778 of 2008 CHANDAN PODDAR @ CHANDAN KUMAR PODDAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 18.12.2008. N.H./ This revision has been preferred against the order and judgment dated 27th February,2008 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Kishanganj in Sessions Trial No.118 of 2007 thereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge while convicting and sentencing the accused Rakesh Paswan and Sanjay Paswan has acquitted three accused persons, namely, Manju Devi, Indra Devi and Ram Bilas Paswan, who are opposite party nos.2 to 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there are sufficient material also against opposite party nos.2 to 4 for conviction along with other two accused persons, but the court below has wrongly acquitted those accused persons. Considered the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned judgment. On perusal of the impugned judgment as well as F.I.R., it appears that there is no specific allegation against these three opposite parties. Under the circumstances, this Court is not inclined to interfere under the revisional jurisdiction in the impugned order. Accordingly, this application is rejected. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )