IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1832 OF 2004 PETITION NO.1832 OF 2004 PETITION NO.1832 OF 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Note, Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders Memoranda of Coram appearance, Corut’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders: ------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Mohan Bir Singh i/b.Pooja Singh for Petitioner. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 10th March, 2005 : 10th March, 2005 : 10th March, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. Wr Petition No.1582 of 2001 was disposed of by order dated 19th April, 2002. Clause (ii) of the order reads as under:- "(ii) We observe that if such representation is made by petitioners to respondent No.5 within three weeks from today, the respondent No.5 shall take decision thereon objectively after hearing petitioners or their representative, as the case may be." It appears that the petitioners did make a representation. That came to be heard by ED (T & C) Railway Board and the representation was rejected. This amounts to total non-compliance with the order of this Court dated 19th April, 2002. In the light of that Rule made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). The Railway Board to decide the representation of the petitioners within three months from today. In the meantime the interim orders to continue till the decision by the Railway Board and for a period of 15 days thereafter. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (S.P. (S.P. (S.P. KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.)