^/ '^0 -1- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISHGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. ^, m^^ W.P. (S) No. ^'.:73>0 2008 Petitioner ... ... Naresh Kumar Chandraker., aged 52 years^ /^ Son of Shri Bansilal Chandraker, Head Master, Govt. Primary School, Dhamna Block and Tahsil Patan District Durg (C.G.) ,^: .-^" ^•\^ i .••:^<;?\.y:<<' t.y'^-y ^.^r ^ r^/" RespondentS •)'< .^'^. ^oX4>' ^ Versus 1. State Govemment of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer, Durg (C.G.) o^ Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus/direction or any other appropriate writ <1 o ose HiGH.COURT QF.CHHATTISGARH : 81LASPUR PETlTIONER WRiT PET!TjON IS) N0., 5730,OE 2008 Naresh Kumar Chandraker Versus State Government of Chhattlsgam & Anoth©r (Writ Pentlon under Articie 226 ofthe Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner^ Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. Generai with Shri N.,N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for.the State. ORDERJORAU (Passsd on this 22nd day of March, 2010) 1. The State/respondents in its return dated 24-2-2010 have categoricaiiy stated that appropriate steps would be taken affording an opportunity of hearing to the petltioner and the present pelition may be dlsposed of m the as per the order passed by this Court in R.L. ¥. of & Another . 2. In vlew of the above categoricaj statement made by the State, accordlng to learned counsei for the petitioner nothing sumves in thls'petrtion for adjudicatlon. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dlsposed of wlth 'the aforesaid llberty. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ' WP (3) No.6490 of 08 (deoided on 26-2-200S).