WP(C) 4113/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Heard Mr. M Dutta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also h eard Mr. D Saikia, learned State counsel and Ms. Huda, learned Central Govt . counsel, for the respondents. Considering the grievance raised in the writ petition and as agreed to b y the learned counsel appearing for the parties, this writ petition is being dis posed of at the admission stage itself. The instant writ petition has been filed with a limited prayer i.e. for setting aside and quashing the conditions imposed in the order/bail bonds dated 14.01.2010 while granting bail to the petitioners. The petitioners earlier approached this Court by filing a writ petition being WP(C) No. 5243/2009, challenging the legality and validity of the judgment and order dated 08.01.2009 passed by the Foreigner’s Tribunal-1, Barpeta, in co nnection with FT Case No.274/2007(B) arising out of F.T. Reference No.2142/2001, whereby and whereunder the petitioners and their minor daughter were declared foreigners. This Court while issuing notice of motion in the said writ petitio n vide order dated 09.12.2009 directed the petitioners to surrender before the S uperintendent of Police (SP for short) Barpeta and in the interim, the SP Barpet a, was asked to take decision regarding granting bail to the petitioners. The pe titioners, thereafter, surrendered before the SP Barpeta, with a prayer for allo wing them to go on bail but the same was not considered. The petitioners thereaf ter filed a miscellaneous application before this Court being M.C. Case No. 3510 /2009 in WP(C) No. 5243/2009 and the said M.C Case was disposed of vide order da ted 23.12.2009 directing the SP, Barpeta to re-consider the petitioner’s prayer for bail. Pursuant to the order dated 23.12.2009, the SP Barpeta allowed the pet itioners to go on bail imposing some terms and conditions. In the meantime, this Court vide order dated 01.02.2010 disposed of the writ petition by setting asid e the impugned order passed by the learned Member, Foreigners Tribunal and reman ded back the case of the petitioners to the Tribunal to try the same afresh. Acc ordingly the same was tried afresh by the learned Member, Foreigners Tribunal an d on 18.05.2010 passed the judgment and order declaring that the petitioner and his family members are not foreigners. The petitioners, thereafter submitted an application along with a certified copy of the judgment and order dated 18.05.20 10 to the SP, Barpeta for exempting them from the terms and conditions of the ba il bond but the SP, Barpeta, refused to exempt them from the terms and condition s imposed at the time of granting bail unless directed by this Court. Hence the instant writ petition with the aforesaid prayer. Admittedly the conditions imposed by the SP, Barpeta, in terms of the in terim order passed by this Court was valid up to the disposal of the writ petiti on, which was disposed of on 01.02.2010 by allowing the petition and remanding t he matter back to the Foreigners Tribunal for fresh trial. Accordingly, the Fore igners Tribunal heard the matter afresh and passed the judgment and order declar ing that the petitioner and his family members are not foreigners as alleged. Ho wever, the conditions imposed at the time of granting bail by the SP, Barpeta ev en if vide judgment and order passed by the learned Foreigners Tribunal , the pe titioners were held to be not foreigners, as alleged, the terms and conditions i mposed by the S.P. Barpeta, at the time of granting bail have not been withdraw n. That being the position the SP, Barpeta is hereby directed to withdraw the op eration of the conditions imposed upon the petitioners while granting bail to th em. The petitioners are directed to submit a certified copy of this order be fore the SP, Barpeta for doing the needful. Mr. Saikia, learned State counsel has placed before this Court a communi cation dated 02.08.2010 made to him by the SP, Barpeta. I have perused the same. The said written communication is placed on record and is marked as ’X’ for ide ntification. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.