S. B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 704/2007 NARPAT SINGH V. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & OTHERS. DATE OF ORDER ::: 19/09/2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. M. TOTLA Mr. H.S.Balot, for Petitioner (s). Mr.S.N.Tiwari, PP, for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.D.Purohit for Respondents No.2 to 17. Petitioner and respondents stated that only arguments are to be heard and nothing is to be complied with. Arguments heard. Respondents No. 2 to 17 are facing trial for the offences of Sections 147 and 427, IPC, which was initiated on complaint of petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that charge against respondents is for the offence of Sections 147 and 427, IPC, - if charges for the offence of Section 427 which is of cutting and taking away trees than by implication is that trespass too committed - in such a position, charge of section 447 is also to be framed. Argued that even application of the petitioner for framing of charge under Section 447 is rejected which apparently, for above reason, is erroneous. Learned Public Prosecutor argued that the matter pertains to some road and not necessarily charge under Section 447 also made out. Learned counsel for respondents No. 2 to 17 contended that for charge of Section 427 is and charge under Section 447 is not made out - order of the learned Magistrate very elaborate one which upheld in revision by the learned Sessions Judge. Considered. It cannot be said as a must that for every charge of Section 427, charge of 447 is also to be. Reason for framing of charges appear in the order of the learned Sessions Judge. Respondents charged for offence of Sections 147 and 447 are facing trial. For also framing charge, as above, there is no merit and no interference by invoking provisions of Section 482, Cr.P.C., is called for. The petition is dismissed. (C. M. TOTLA), J.