IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.638 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2185 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.1656 OF 2005 Pankaj K. Gupta .... Appellant Vs. Mrs. Swaran K. Gupta .... Respondent Sarvasri M.P.S. Rao with Sanskar Marathe for the Appellant. Shri Kamal Khata i/b M/s. J.A. Shah & Associates for the Respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SRI R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & SRI R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: DATED: DATED: APRIL 04, 2008 P.C: P.C: P.C: Heard. Only grievance which the appellant has in relation to the impugned order dated 28-3-2007 is that the Receiver is misusing the power given to him under the said order in as much as that in one of the areas of the suit premises where there exists a door is sought to be converted in to a permanent wall. Certainly in this regard if the appellant needs any direction, nothing prevents the appellant from approaching the learned single Judge to get necessary clarification in relation to the powers of the Receiver to be exercised under the impugned order or the modalities in which the repairs to the premises are to be carried out. With these observations, as nothing further needs to be done in the impugned order, the appeal is rejected. (R.S.Mohite, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/A8a638.7 sjs/A8a638.7 sjs/A8a638.7