1 ca 297-2006.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 297 OF 2006 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 105 OF 2006 Kiran Prabhakar Kumbhar & Anr. ..Applicants vs. M/s.Hydrochem Engineers & Anr. ..Respondents Mr.Sachin S. Punde for the Applicants. Mr.P.S. Dani for the Respondents. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J DATED : FEBRUARY 1, 2011. P.C. : 1 Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2 This is a Civil Application filed by the respondent-defendant for vacating the ad-interim relief granted by this Court vide Order dated 18th March, 2006. 3 The appellant-plaintiff has filed a suit 2 ca 297-2006.sxw restraining the defendant from manufacturing certain product which according to him are exclusively manufactured by him. In the said suit, an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC was filed by the respondent. The same is rejected. 4 On perusal of the order, it would reveal that ad-interim relief granted was exparte without hearing the parties. Perusal of the order of the learned trial court would reveal that the learned trial court has found that neither the plaintiff had any registered patent nor any exclusive licence to manufacture the product in respect of which an order of injunction was sought. 5 Even today, the appellants are not in a position to point out any patent or the licence which bestows any right upon them to exclusively manufacture the product, in question. 3 ca 297-2006.sxw 6 In that view of the matter, I find that no case is made out for grant of interim relief. 7 Civil Application for interim relief, therefore, stands rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J)