L^'^^! IN THE HON'BLE HIGH OOUKT OF CHiaTTISGAEH AT BILASPUf GIVIL REVISION N0 . '^ OF 2004 APPLIGANT ORIGINAL NON-APPLIGANT No.l VERSUS NON-&PPL I CSKiTS /^y^ ^c^ ^y •••^•Cte^ ^ "/^ vy^ Mahendra Kumar oupta son of Govind Prasad, ag-ed about 45 years by caste- supta Kesharwani Hindur{i resident of Barpali chowk Champa (M.P.) (Nowc.G.), Mus. Kushi Bai aged about 62 years, D/o. oovind Prasad wife of Chhedi l,al @ Nankan by caste-;GuptaKesbarwanl., Hindu, R/o. infront of Samleshwari Mandir, Champa District Bilaspur (M.P.) (Now. C.G.). OrjLglnal Applicant. 2« Mus. Dhiraj Bai aged 57 years D/o. Govind Prasad , wife of Chandrika Prasad by caste- Gupta Kesharwaai, Hindu, R/o. Devkar, Tah. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (M.P.)(Now C.G.). 3. Mus. ShantJ. Bai aged 54 yegrs, D/o. eovind Prassd, wife of Shivnarayan, by caste Gypta Kesharwani, Hindu, s/o. village Sunder Nagar, State Banls Colony Ralpur. &s'^ Mus. Laxmin Bai aged 58 years, D/o. Govind Prasad, wife of ! Gajanan Prasad.by caste- Gupta;' Kesharwani, Hindu, R/Q.|near Hardev Lal Mandir, Kawardha, District Rsjnandgaon (M^E.) (How C.G.). | • • : j i. Hurtaja Hussain aged 30 IxeacS'l -?- i:- ! \'v: :'l \\^ itll 1BJ ! 2 8 : son of Mohd. Hussain, by caste Bohara, Musalman, resident of Hatarl Bazar, Champa, Distt. Bilaspur (M.P.) (Now. C.G.). . State of Madfaya Pradesh (Now C.G.) through- Collector, Bilaspur. CIVILREVISION UMDEa SECTION 115 OF G«P.C. XI-HC-22 -3-5g'?nqI?T2(, •NtWIS, fawK-iy ^iT^?r iR^? 11HCTI «»HI<0 ^.j2.^^..&6.^ ail^t'WT Rt-fi'* 311^1 ^hHt^ 1ttts^ ^l^l' ^n^T'^lT^:^rfl^F 30.09.2004 Heard Shri Malay Kumar Bhajduri, There are absolutely no mei| the same is dismissed. The suit which was dismissey trial Court after accepting the reasojis appearance., The trial Court hayingl impugnsd order, this Court shall nt>t fact that the proceedings are instit^ited shall dispose pf firstly the applicati^n and thereafter the suit. This exerois^ six months from the date ofthe In vtewofthis order, I.A. No. 1| t^Nt^l^ TTFR^I^ f%t<il <i^<fegl< ^si^nsffer duri, counsel for the applicant. its in this revision petition. Therefore for default has been restored by the given by the plalntiffs for their non- exercissti its jurisdiction/-[?assed the interfere. However, considering the in the year 1999, the trial Court filed by the plaintiff to Sue Pauper must be completed within a period pf order. 1528/2004 stonds disposed of. receibt of this sd/- Chief Justice