IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9191 of 2009 JAI MANGAL PRASAD,son of Ram Ishwar Prasad,resident of Khodaganj,P.S.- Khodaganj,District-Nalanda,at present Bishnu Bagicha,P.S.-Khodaganj, District-Nalanda. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 10-04-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It is strange that learned counsel for the petitioner only insisted upon the defence, which is not part of the judicial system. A complaint is filed making some allegation in Janta Darbar and some order was made though by the Chief Minister and a separate enquiry was conducted in which the allegation levelled against the petitioner was denied, but learned counsel for the petitioner failed to point out its legal sanctity, otherwise there is clear and direct allegation about commitment of rape. In his further attempt he had obtained an affidavit from the husband of the complainant that she had not left the house. So, the question does not arise for commitment of rape, which is nothing more than tampering with the witnesses. Finding a clear and specific allegation against the petitioner, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )