1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 987 OF 2003 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2039 OF 2002 M/s. Shubhankar Investments & Finance Co. Ltd., .. Plaintiffs vs. Eupharma Laboratories Ltd,. & Anr. .. Defendants. Mr. Ambreen Saheed i/by Kantawala & Co. for plaintiffs. Ms. Revati Rajput i/by L.S. Jain for defendants. CORAM : S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 26TH SEPTEMBER, 2005. P.C. . The learned counsel for the plaintiff seeks leave to withdraw the Summons for Judgment in view of the fact that the defendant company is declared as sick undertaking under section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions ) Act, 1985 with liberty to take out fresh Summons for Judgment after the defendant company comes out from the declaration of sick undertaking. Summons for 2 Judgment is withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 2. The defendants advocates are directed to keep the plaintiff as well as the office of this Court informed of the status of the BIFR case every six months and in an event if there is any final order passed, the same to be communicated within a period of two weeks from passing of such order.