IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15901 of 2011 Pinku Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 23.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other FIR named accused persons were removing transformer from a electric pole. The stand of the petitioner is that as a matter of fact, petitioner is labourer and he himself fixed the aforesaid transformer but subsequently, some villagers made complaint in respect of the aforesaid transformer and thereafter, the petitioner and his associates were removing defective transformer but unfortunately, under some mis-conception they were caught by the informant and his associates. It is also pointed out that having similar allegation some co-accused persons have already been granted privilege of bail vide order dated 2.6.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 15172/2011. Accordingly, the petitioner, Pinku Kumar is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, (Electricity) Magadh Area, Gaya in Trial no. 70/2011 arising out of Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case no. 281/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)