IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND TEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1942 of 2010 Between: M/s. Sree Communications, Ongole, Prakasam District. … Petitioner And Union of India, rep., by its Under Secretary, Ministry of Communication & Broad Castings, Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri D.V. Nagarjuna Babu Counsel for respondent No.3: Sri B. Nalin Kumar This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1942 of 2010 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed against interlocutory order dated 18.12.2009 passed by respondent No.2 – Tribunal (for short, “the Tribunal”) in pending appeal filed by the petitioner before it. The dispute pertains to the entitlement of the petitioner to transmit signals in Chirala town. It is not in dispute that as on today no agreement has been in existence between the petitioner and respondent No.3 to transmit signals in Chirala town. However, it is the case of the petitioner that no such agreement is required for a multi-system operator. Since this aspect is required to be adjudicated by the Tribunal, it is not possible for this Court to interfere with the interlocutory order passed by it pending the appeal. It is brought to my notice by Sri B. Nalin Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No.3, that in pursuance of the observations made by this Court in order dated 29.01.2010, the petitioner approached the Tribunal for clarification of the impugned order and that by order dated 23.02.2010 the said application was disposed of with the observation that no clarification was required. In the above circumstances, I do not find any reason to interfere with the interlocutory order passed by the Tribunal. The writ petition is therefore dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the pending appeal before the Tribunal. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.2608 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 15.03.2010 ES