IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6812 of 2010 1. MITHILESH RAI , S/o Thakur Rai 2. Suhagamati Devi, W/o Mithilesh Rai Both are resident of village D.K. Shikarpur, P.S. – Shikarpur, District – West Champaran (Bettiah) Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.17300 of 2010 CHANDAN RAI, Mithlesh Rai, resident of Village – D.K. Shikarpur, P.S. – Shikarpur, District West Champaran (Bettiah) Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 11.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that marriage was a love marriage of the deceased with petitioner of Cr. Misc. No. 17300 of 2010 (Chandan Rai). So, no question arises about demand. It was the fate of the husband that his wife was killed. Taking that into consideration prayer of the petitioner no. 1 & 2 of Cr. Misc. No. 6812 of 2010 is allowed, and at the same time, prayer of the petitioner of Cr. Misc. 17300 of 2010 is rejected. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order in connection with Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 101 of 2009 above named petitioner no. 1 & 2 of Cr. Misc. No. 6812 of 2010 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. So far as petitioner of Cr. Misc. No. 17300 of 2010 is concerned, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Praful ( Mandhata Singh , J.)