IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETITIONf^) N0 PETITIONER MESPONDENT ^d^ •^ ^^ ^)Wv' ^/^'l^ ^.<4<^ ^/sy ./^y »'" .:'•-•" ' .' OF 2011 ~^f^l3f^/'/ Smt. Bharati Jha W/o Mr. R. N. Jha Aged above 61 years R/o 1-2 Kalindi Kunj Colony Ring Road 2(C.G.)/ Gilq-sp"^ VERSUS ifState of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan Mantralaya , Raipur (C.G.) ^ ^' .^y' y 2)Smt. Sharada Sharma W/o Shri Vijay Sharma, Aged about 51 years, Saraswati Shishu Mandir, Ashok Nagar Road , Infront of Rajasva colony Working as Principal Govt. High School Lakhasar.^'w- ^Lw^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. Particular of petitioner As mentioned in the cause title above. 2. Particulars of respondents. As mentioned in the cause title above. UT, ^^y ,^^: i-iQW COljRTC'sF C'-i-iATTiSQARH - R" ASPliR "^S^ & ^<w/ ^ ^ '';?*fS1T QS''r"lTirt-i\: /i?\ 5'i<- K;'1? '1!^ ^S ^3^* ^ ^yr^i; fi-: i j_t i\-/i'^i.aj :TIU,_».; ij-.^s'i^.'.j' i ;L :,^ ~ )-»~^•-•"1 ,\ ; £°"i 3 S: €•tS.-"^ is>.»?^^?•..STC* i~'<£.^i'^l»/r'a-U£r'*li <•» \ ^/^.?-^-'.t ^^^ VS-fSUS Q.A.—'-.--,^ ^^^.->"i^r-^,?^ .?_ a7-..".-^-s.~r ^i.eaiy U! •»»/!H l-saii!S?ycti ss Cs ftiiUul^i {'A'rit Peation urider Artiole 228 of the Constifution of india) Singie 3ench : Hon bie Shri Saissh K. ^nihcrtri, J. it'.- Shfl Nlshendrs Dubsv, Aclvocsts foi'ths DstitiQH8r. Shrj V.V.S.Nurthy, Dv. Advocate Qenera! for the State. OSDtR(ORAU CPassed on this 02ncl dav of September, 2011) Chaiienge in this peiiiion is to the order dated 25.08.2Q1 1 (Annexure P-2), Qssssd bv th©r&sporidefit No.1, 'whsrebv, 'ths petltlonsr Vvorklno as Principai, Government Nago Rao Shesh HiGher Secondarv Schooi, Slock Bilhs. District BiiSspur, hss b©8r)trsfiSiSiTsd to Govsrnmsnt Hl9ii isoiiool LsKnsssr, i5iGCt< s sKiiSlpur, UiStnct '^tiaspuf, on sclmiHaStfSuv's ^jLiuati-Sa. LSSJTsSd OOUHSS; apDSSsiH'Q tc'f thS pStit;OH©fSubH^ltS th'Sl thQ p^titiOHSf is goiHy to rSiirs on j /.uz.zu!^ un sup&rsnnusTiori. t nus, si irsQ Tsg sna OT Hi3 SSFviGS GSfSSF, 'tHS psiiBOH©fspouiQ HOi DS xrsrssT&rrsQ, QS TilSfS 1% a rsslric.lion in transfer of the erriplovees, 1'vho have one vsar or sess for SUSSiaRiiUSIiOH. Shri Nufthv, !earnsd Dv. AdvoGats Genefal, a'o'oeanno for the State TSiiHy susmi'iS THSI >7 s icpfsssrii.Siion 33 msds sv ins psiniGiiSf, in©ssnis SHSil &'S COHSIQSr&u SHy OSC^uSCi, ss ssfiV ss pc^siDls, ?r©T©raDlv V^itHlH a perjod of three weefes, in view of the prevaiSng circuiars. !n Ihe 'Tieantime, no effect to the impugned order dated 25.08.2011 (Annexure f~^.) 'sH fSSpSG^ GT 7HS pSul'iOHSr SHSIs D6 giVQii. Ls'sriisd cou;is©lsppsariiiM for ths pstuiopsSf subiTElts thst In vlsvv of foregoing, noth'Sng surtf'ives for aojudication in 'ihe matter at this stage. Accordincj'y, the wr;t petiiion stands disposed of. Saus,.^w»>"t'1 jud&e