g1 C V” 1 Mp mm 3am IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ' PETITIONER :2) :3) Suresh Kumar Singh Chauhan, S/o. Shri Chandrabali Singh Chauhan, aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher working as Head Master, Government Primaly School, Jadiguda, Block Bastar District Jagdalpur (Chhattisgarh) ' Versus ’/ The State of Chhattisgarh RESPONDENTS : 1 through Secretary School Education Department Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavvan, G.E.Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarhl f District Education Officer, Bastar, District Jagdalpur (Chhattisgarh) Hemant Panigrahi, S/o. Shri Janardan Panigrahi, 47 years, Assistant Teacher Government Middle School, Titirgaon, Block Bastar District Jagdalpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ll w.P.{S) Nosgu or 2010 J> mam, m, W . r. uslce rimker alwaker 8-1t)-2010 Mr. K.S. Pawar, counsei "or the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents No.1 &2. Heard. Grievance of the petitioner is that though the petitioner has preferred a representation a has not been decided tilt date. g Counsel for the petitioner referred to the gradation list (Annexure P-1) from which'it is found that he petitioner is placed over and above respondent No.3. lt is also st ted in the petition that the petitioner holds qualification of M.A., D Ed. andmb'elongs to OBC category. Furthercontention of the peitioner is that he has never been communicated with any advers remark nor any departmental enquiry is pending and till date he has n tbeen punished by the Department. in View of the averment made in this’petition it appears that junior to the petitioner has been romoted. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this peti ion with liberty to me representation before respondent No.2. He fu er submits that almost in similar facts and circumstances, this Court has passed order dated 17-9-2010 (Annexure P-6) in W.P.(S)No. 337/2010 and considering the said eved by his supersession, the same \7. a i mmwl23/Sm( m mu 31m:m (Wu) 3m$$ " ' m “F“m mm ‘ $um am ww‘rw em m XI-HC—78 Wm W P(S)§9%4?2/5>0/0 311wm (Wt!) WW mm m ‘ ‘ 2_ mm?W W WK '%& #&§$ order, respondent No.2 may be directed to aeoloe thelrepresentEtion of the petitioner in accordance With law. Accordingiy, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with iiberty to tile proper representation before respondent No.2 within three weeks from the date of receipt of oopy of this order and in turn, it is expected from the competent authority to decide the representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within three months from the date of receipt of the said representation. Ordered accordingly. lf the grievance of the petitioner is not redressed, it would be open to the petitioner to take recourse to such remedy as available to him under the law. 0‘ r Sd/— ‘ ” Pritinker Diwaker Judge 50m a /’/, -