IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 1737 OF 1995 Dr. Keshav Kumar Singh .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & 4 ors. .. Respondents None for the petitioner. Mrs. S.S. Bhende, AGP for State. CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE & CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE & CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE & D. B. BHOSALE,JJ. D. B. BHOSALE,JJ. D. B. BHOSALE,JJ. Date : March 24, 2006. Date : March 24, 2006. Date : March 24, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . It is obvious that the petitioner has lost his interest to get this petition adjudicated on merits. The office note shows that the learned Advocate for the petitioner did not take any steps to remove the office objection and, therefore, the petition came to be dismissed in default on or about 2/9/2004 on account of failure to comply with the order passed earlier on 26/7/2004. Subsequently, Civil Application No.157 of 2005 was allowed and the writ petition was restored to the file by the order dated 28/4/2005. Bhatta was taxed for issuing restoration notice but no steps were taken to pay the Bhatta. Even though the respondents are represented by the learned Advocates, none is present for the petitioner and, therefore, we have no hesitation to hold that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the petition. . The petition is dismissed for non prosecution. (D.B. Bhosale,J.) (D.B. Bhosale,J.) (D.B. Bhosale,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle, J.) (B.H. Marlapalle, J.) (B.H. Marlapalle, J.)