BailAppl 606/08 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.606/08 Pramod Kumar Chaudhary Versus State DATE OF ORDER : 19/02/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. J.R. Chaudhary, for accused-petitioner Mr. C.R. Punia, for complainant Mr. R.P. Kuldeep, Public Prosecutor *** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State and so also counsel for complainant and perused the material on record. Counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner, who happens to be husband of complainant, is a government servant and he has already been interrogated by the Investigating Officer and no recovery is to be made from him and other co-accused, his father & mother, have already been enlarged on bail u/s.438/439 Cr.P.C., as such he may also be considered for grant of anticipatory bail in the facts of instant case. From perusal of record/case diary and so also statement of complainant Manohari Devi, which was read over before this court by Public Prosecutor, primary allegation is in respect of offence u/s.313 IPC against the accused-petitioner. Taking note of statement of complainant and so also the nature of accusation with regard to offence as alleged to have been committed u/s.313 IPC, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail u/s.438 Cr.P.C. to the accused- petitioner. BailAppl 606/08 [2] Consequently, the bail application u/s.438 Cr.P.C. stands dismissed. However, if petitioner surrenders before learned trial Judge, his bail application be simultaneously considered in accordance with law. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA606Bail Application2008 19-2.doc