petjtioner Piamtiff Defendant No.1 Respondents Non-appllcants Appellants HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petstson (Art.227) No.7389 of 2011 Sovaram, S/o. Tikaram, agcd about 66 years, Caste Hlndu, CultJvator, R/o.Viiiage Malhar, Tahssl Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) versus .1. Girija Bai< W/o.Laxmi Prasad, aged about 35 years, Caste Hlndu, Cultjvator, R/o, Villago Sevti, Tahsll BJIha, District Bilasur (C.G.) 2. Sarojani Bai, Vv7o. Gajanand, aged about 31 years, Caste Hlndu, R/o. Viliage Siidaha, Tahsii Pathariya, Dlstrict Bilaspur (C.G-). 3. Stats Chhattisgarh throygh CQlSector, Bilaspur, Dlstrict BIIaspur 'f^- r^: Vw.'^i.J (vVrit Petltion undor A.nicio 227 oftho Constltution of India) sVj.Ram Kumar Tswari, Advocate for tho petltlbner^ Vr.Sumit Jhanwar, Panel Lawycrfor respondont No.S/State. (SB: Hon'bis Mr. T.P. Shsrma, J.) (8-12-2011) 1. By this writ petltion under Artlcle 227 of'the Constjtution of india thc potltsonor has chailengod the logaiity and proprioty of the order datod 31.10.2011 passed by the 1al Additlonai Dlstrict Judgs, Bilaspur, in MJ.C.t^o.4/11, whereby the 1st Addiiionai District Judge has ©iiowedthe applscation filod cn bohalf of rospondonts No/1 and 2 undor Soction 5 oftho Ljmitatlon Act. 2. I havo heard iearnod counsoi for the partios, perused tho ordor jmpugnoa and other documsnts fi!ed on behalf ofthe petltioner. 3. After porusai oftho order impugned, 1 do not find any iilogaiity or jnfjrm^ty In the ordor impugncd warrantjng jntorferenco^ 4, Consoquontiy, tho writ petitjon is liabie to be dismissed and it Is horeby dlsmissod» No ordor as io costs. ^' Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge