1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Applications Nos.3618, 3619 and 3620 of 2008 In Misc. Civil Application (Review) Stamp No.13427 of 2007 In Cross Objection No.19 of 2006 (D) In First Appeal No.191 of 1991 (D) (The Municipal Council, Wardha v. Murlidhar Govindramji Jajodia and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Smt. M.A. Barabde, Advocate for Applicant. Shri D.S. Agnihotri, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4. Coram : R.C. Chavan, J. Dated : 5 th April, 2010 By these applications, the the applicant seeks setting aside abatement, condonation of delay and bringing legal representatives of respondent Nos.2 and 7 on record. Respondent Nos.2 and 7 died during the pendency of the appeal. The applicant is the Municipal Council. The proposed legal representatives of respondent Nos.2 and 7 have been duly served, but have not cared to appear and contest these applications. The learned counsel for the other respondents, viz. respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4, vehemently opposes these applications. 2 However, considering the reasons given in the applications, the applications are allowed, subject to the applicants depositing the costs of Rs.1,000/- with the High Legal Services Sub-Committee, Nagpur, within one week. The legal representatives of respondent Nos.2 and 7 be brought on record. Necessary amendment be carried out in the cause title. Issue notice to the newly-added respondents on the application for condonation of delay in filing the review application as well as review application, returnable on 3-5-2010. Judge. pdl