IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2430 of 2011 RADHEY @ RADHEY SHYAM THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04/ 16.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 29.4.2005 in connection with Runisaidpur P.S. Case no.83/2004 registered under sections 302, 326, 307, 120B/34 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act. It appears from perusal of the first information report as well as the statement of the injured Lalji Tanger that the petitioner and one Baliram Singh used to demand extortion money and the aforesaid fact came to the knowledge of the informant as well as above stated Lalji Tanger from one Shankar Sah. The aforesaid Shankar Sah has not been examined in this case. Moreover, from the first information report as well as statement of Lalji Tanger, there is no allegation of firing against the petitioner and it appears from perusal of the report of the Addl. Sessions Judge FTC no. IV, Sitamarhi that up till now charge has not been framed against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Radhey @ Radhey Shyam Thakur, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge FTC No. IV, Sitamarhi in Sessions Trial no. 527/2005 arising out of Runisaidpur P.S. Case no. 83/2004 with condition that one of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner and furthermore, the petitioner shall attend the learned trial 2 court on each and every date in person for the period of six months and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without any genuine cause, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)