IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8854 of 2008 MD.SALIM & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.5.2008 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner no. 3 Md. Munna @ Munna has been arrested during the pendency of the anticipatory bail application and accordingly he seeks permission to withdraw the application so far as it relates to petitioner no. 3. The application is dismissed as infructuous so far as Md. Munna @ Munna petitioner no. 3 is concerned. With respect to the other three petitioners, it is stated that the petitioner no. 1 is the father-in-law, petitioner no. 2 is the mother-in-law and petitioner no. 4 is the Gotni. Learned counsel contends that the allegation in the complaint is of general nature without any specific facts being mentioned. It is stated that specific allegation is against the husband of having beaten her badly on the instigation of his family members. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that the petitioners (1) Md. Salim, (2) Nazboo Khatoon @ Nazboon Khatoon and petitioner no. 4 Rokhasana Khatoon, in the event of their arrest/surrender in the Court below within four weeks from today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 649/07, T.R. 1787/07 to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad subject 2 to the other applicable conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. P. Kumar ( Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.)