IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2434 OF 2004. PETITION NO. 2434 OF 2004. PETITION NO. 2434 OF 2004. Nitesh Wadhwani. ... Petitioner. V/s. Union of India and others. ... Respondents. Dr.Virendra Tulzapurkar with Janak Dwarkadas, H.P.Singh, Sanjeev Sachdeva, Ms.Geeta Rijwani, Vinod Bhagat, H.J.Engineer and Ms.Gautami Bhoir i/b. Govardhandas & Fozdar for the petitioner. Rajiv Chavan for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Aspi Chinoy with Ravi Kadam and Shyam Diwan i/b. Mulla & Mulla for respondent No.4. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & V.C.DAGA, V.C.DAGA, V.C.DAGA, J.J.J. September September September 10, 2004. 10, 2004. 10, 2004. P.C. P.C. P.C. : . We have heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This petition is filed with a prayer for direction to the respondents to issue certified copy of the application for review filed in Application No.717458 in Class 34 for registration of Trade Mark and the order dated 23rd July 2004 passed by respondent No.3, the Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks in Application No.717458 in Class 34 filed by one Rasiklal Manikchand Dhariwal trading as Manikchand Zarda. 3. Affidavit of respondent No.2 has been produced in the Court today. 4. We are informed that the matter is coming up before the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 13th Septemebr 2004. Respondent No.2 undertakes to produce entire record of this case before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Parties would be at liberty to file documents before this Court as well as before the Supreme Court. 5. In our opinion, no further directions are necessary. Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. CHIEF CHIEF CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE JUSTICE V.C. V.C. V.C. DAGA, J. DAGA, J. DAGA, J.