IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7813 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 03, 2010. Harjit Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner retired as a Senior Assistant from the office of the Deputy Commissioner, Faridkot, w.e.f. 30.6.2009 on attaining the age of superannuation. Vide an order dated 5.3.2010 (Annexure P-3), he has been granted the benefit of 185 days' leave encashment only. The petitioner's grievance is that he is entitled to the benefit of leave encashment for 115 days' more, i.e., total 300 days. This fact was statedly brought to the notice of the authorities by the petitioner vide representation dated 21.11.2009 (Annexure P-2), which, it appears, has not been considered while passing the subsequent order dated 5.3.2010 (Annexure P-3). In these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with a C.W.P.No .7813 of 2010 2 direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Faridkot to re-consider the claim of the petitioner regarding encashment of un-utilized earned leave, as noticed above, and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Dasti. May 03, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE