1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1620 OF 2009. Sharad s/o Jagannath Taksal ...Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. ... Mr.A.G.Godhamgaonkar, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs.S.B.Wadmare, APP for the respondent. ... CORAM: A.V.NIRGUDE,J. Date : 22nd June, 2009. COURT'S ORDER: 1. The applicant is seeking bail in Crime No.35/2009 registered with Mohadinagar Police Station, Dhule for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 471 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. It is alleged that the applicant after availing loan from the complainant company purchased certain vehicle and without taking the complainant's permission sold it away to a third party. Thereafter 2 he supplied false information to the complainant company creating an impression that he had purchased the vehicle and got it registered in his name etc.. At ad-interim stage on 26th May, 2009, my learned predecessor granted him bail. Even otherwise, the applicant deserves bail because he was in police custody between 17th April, 2009 to 22nd April, 2009 and thereafter, he remained in custody further till he was finally released of custody. The learned 3rd Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule, refused him bail on 9th of May, 2009 mostly because the investigation was still incomplete. Now, the applicant deserves bail. i) The earlier order passed by this Court, at ad- interim stage on 26th May, 2009, releasing the applicant on bail shall be final order. ii) The application is idsposed of. (A.V.NIRGUDE,J.) lkp.