IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2008 / 28TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 18256 of 2008(W) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 22/02/2008 IN IA 971/08 IN OS.727/1997 of PRL.M.C., KOLLAM .................... PETITIONER: -------------------- CHINTHAMONY, D/O.SARADA PANICKER, SEKHARA VILASOM, CUTCHERRY WARD, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. SUMATHY, MELLOTTU VILAYIL, MURUNTHAN,PERINAD,KOLLAM. 2. CHANDRIKA, DEVI VIHAR, MELLOTTU VILAYIL, MURUNTHAN, PERINAD, KOLLAM. 3. BINDU LEKHA, MUKURAVILA, KOTTATHALA CHERRY, KOTTARAKKARA. 4. SUDHEERAN, DEVI VIHAR, PERINADU, KOLLAM. 5. VIDHYADHARA SUKESAN, VENJERIL VEEDU, PERINADU,KOLLAM. 6. VALSALAN, VENJERIL VEEDU, PERINADU, KOLLAM. 7. BAGEERATHI, MELLOTTU VEEDU, MURUNTHALA P.O., PERINADU, KOLLAM. 8. SASIKUMAR, MELLOTTU VEEDU, MURUNTHALA P.O., PERINADU, KOLLAM. Kss ..2/- ....2..... WPC.NO.18256/2008 W 9. SASIDHARAN, MELLOTTU VEEDU, MURUNTHALA P.O., PERINADU, KOLLAM. 10. USHA, MELLOTTU VEEDU, MURUNTHALA P.O., PERINADU, KOLLAM. 11. SHILA, MELLOTTU VEEDU, MURUNTHALA P.O., PERINADU, KOLLAM. 12. SASIRAJAN, MELLOTTU VEEDU, MURUNTHALA P.O., PERINAD, KOLLAM. 13. SASHEENDRAN, MELLOTTU VEEDU, MURUNTHALA P.O., PERINAD, KOLLAM. 14. PASUPALA PANICKER, MELLOTTU VEEDU, MURUNTHALA P.O., PERINADU, KOLLAM. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. ........................................... WP(C).No. 18256 OF 2008 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 18th DAY OF JUNE, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner is the first plaintiff in O.S.727 of 1997 on the file of Munsiff Court, Kollam. I.A.971 of 2008 was filed under Order I Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure to implead additional defendants in the suit. Under Ext.P2 order, the petition was dismissed. Plaintiffs also filed similar application, I.A.1095 of 2008 to implead some more additional parties as defendants 15 to 40. Under Ext.P5 order, the said petition was also dismissed. This petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to quash Ext.P3 to P5 orders contending that learned Munsiff should have impleaded the persons sought for in Ext.P4 application. 2. On hearing the learned counsel and going through Ext.P5 order, I do not find any illegality or irregularity, warranting interference in exercise of the powers of this court under Article 227 of Constitution of India. Petitioner is at liberty to challenge the orders along with final judgment, if it goes against her. Petition is dismissed. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE lgk/-