1303caw842.10.odt 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CAW NO. 842/2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4213 OF 2009 Anuj Ajaykumar Rai Vs. State of Maharashtra & others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Mr. SJ Jichkar, A.G.P. for applicant/respondent No. 1. Mr. Sajid H. Shahid, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. BG Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Mr. Nirbhay Chauhan, Adv. H/f Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: D. D. SINHA & F. M. REIS, JJ. DATED : 23rd MARCH, 2010. Heard. This is an application moved by respondent No.1-the State for modification of the order dated 17/11/2009 passed in writ petition No. 4213 of 2009. The learned Assistant Government Pleader has submitted that in paragraph No.2 of the said order this Court has observed that the petitioner though has applied for admission in First Year B. E. Course from the “Other Backward Class” category, however, the respondent-Authorities have granted admission from the open category in the Management quota. It is contended that the admission granted was not from the open category in the Management quota, but from the open category in the Centralized Admission Process. It is further contended that appropriate corrections in the last line of para 2 of the said order may be made. This fact has not been disputed by the leaned Counsel for the petitioner as well as other respondents. In the circumstances, it appears that the admission was granted to the applicant was not from the open category in the Management quota but from the open category in the Centralized Admission Process, and therefore, the words; “Management quota” should be substituted by words; “Centralized Admission Process”. With these substitution of words in the last line of para 2 of the order dated 17/11/2009, the civil application is disposed of. wwl JUDGE JUDGE