IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4393 OF 2004 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3563 OF 2004 Mahesh Ramanlal Shah ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.Shashank Borade for Applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. OCTOBER 15, 2004. OCTOBER 15, 2004. OCTOBER 15, 2004. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. There is substance in the grievance made that in clause (a) of the operative order, incorrect C.R. number has been mentioned. The : 2 : correct C.R.number is I-104/99, as is mentioned in the first Para of the order. Office to carry out necessary correction in the order dated 24th September 2004. 3. Besides the above correction in clause (a) of the operative order, instead of ‘two local sureties in the like amount’, the same be read as ‘four local sureties in the like amount’, as prayed by the Applicant. Even this correction be carried out in the order as issued dated 24th September 2004. 4. Office to re-issue the corrected copy of the order dated 24th September 2004. 5. Application disposed of on the above terms. 6. All concerned to act on the ordinary copy of this order, duly authenticated as true copy by the Office. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.