IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.201 of 2007 ----------- 1. State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Vishveshwaraiya Bhawan, Patna. 4. The Superintending Engineer, Road Construction Department, North Bihar Circle, Muzaffarpur 5. The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department No.1, Muzaffarpur 6. The District Accounts Officer, Pay Fixation Officer, Muzaffarpur. …. Respondents-Petitioners Versus 1. Rajesh Kumar, son of late Kishore Kumar Verma, resident of village and P.O. Raipur, P.S. Nanpur, District Sitamarhi 2. Shambhu Kumar, son of late Ram Chandra Prasad, resident of Mohalla Race Course, Chawkar Maidan, Muzaffarpur 3. Mohan Paswan, son of Munni Lal Paswan, resident of Muhalla Gobarsahi, P.S. Sadar, Muzaffarpur, District Muzaffarpur. … Petitioners-Opposite Parties -------- For the Petitioners : Mr. A. Amanullah, G.A. IV For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Vivek Prasad, Advocate ------- 09/ 04.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the opposite parties. 2. This petition has been filed for review of order dated 01.02.2006, by which a Bench of this Court allowed C.W.J.C. No. 403 of 2006, quashed the impugned orders contained in Annexures 9 series of the writ petition and levied a cost of Rs.10,000.00 upon the respondents of the writ petition, who are petitioners of this review petition. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not find any error apparent on the face of record of the said order nor does it find any fresh material to take a different view as the said order is supported by several decisions of this Court, 2 namely, order dated 08.04.1997 passed in C.W.J.C. No.8473 of 1992 and its analogous cases; order dated 20.01.2006 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 15112 of 2001; order dated 26.02.2003 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 10048 of 2002; order dated 11.03.2004 passed in L.P.A. No. 563 of 2003; order dated 07.10.2009 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 12697 of 2009; order dated 26.02.2007 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 12616 of 2006; order dated 22.05.2008 passed in L.P.A. No. 832 of 2007 and order dated 01.12.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 8828 of 2006. 4. In the said circumstances, this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order so far as its merit is concerned, but so far the cost awarded in the impugned order is concerned, it is validly shown that the impugned orders (Annexures 9 series ) were passed due to genuine misapprehension of the legal position as decided by several decisions of this Court. 5. In the said circumstances, this review petition is disposed of reviewing and recalling only that part of the impugned order dated 01.02.2006 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 403 of 2006, by which cost was awarded. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )