IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2006 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 67 OF 2003 SMT. LAXMI SANCLU VELIP AND 4 ORS., ... Applicants Versus SMT. SEBASTIAO MIRANDA AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. J. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the Applicants. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 23rd July, 2010 P.C: Heard the learned counsel for the applicants. 2. None is present for the Respondents, though served. 3. This is an application for setting aside abatement in view of the death of Respondent no.1(f). The learned counsel for the appellant makes a statement that the respondents have been duly served. In view of the pursis dated 13/7/2010, the statement is accepted. The Respondents have failed to file any reply opposing the said application. 4. For the reasons stated in the said application,which stands uncontroverted the abatement is set aside. The legal representatives of the deceased respondent no.1(f) as mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application are ordered to be brought on record. Amendment to be carried out within the time prescribed 5. Application stands disposed off. 6. Issue notices to the legal representatives of the deceased respondent no.1(f) after amendment is carried out. F. M. REIS, J. ap/-