IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1977 of 2009 1. Raju Kumar Dubey S/O Late Bishundeo Dubey R/O Vill.- Budhidalaya, P.S.- Kuchaikote, Distt.- Gopalganj Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Birendra Dubey S/O Lalan Pandey R/O Budhidalaya, P.S.- Kuchaikote, Distt.- Gopalganj 3. Rajesh Dubey S/O Lalan Pandey R/O Budhidalaya, P.S.- Kuchaikote, Distt.- Gopalganj 4. Girija Devi W/O Lalan Pandey R/O Budhidalaya, P.S.- Kuchaikote, Distt.- Gopalganj 5. Usha Devi W/O Ramachar Pandey R/O Budhidalaya, P.S.- Kuchaikote, Distt.- Gopalganj 6. Shanti Devi W/O Jagarnath Dubey R/O Budhidalaya, P.S.- Kuchaikote, Distt.- Gopalganj 7. Nandjee Singh S/O Narsingh Singh R/O Hariharpur, P.S.- Yadopur, Budhidalaya, P.S.- Kuchaikote, Distt.- Gopalganj 8. Pradeep Dubey S/O Jagarnath Dubey R/O Budhidalaya, P.S.- Kuchaikote, Distt.- Gopalganj ---------------------------------- 02. 23.12.2011 The informant/petitioner has preferred this revision application against the judgment and order dated 17.11.2009 passed by the learned 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Gopalganj in Sessions Trial No. 444 of 2005/228 of 2009 by which the accused O.P. Nos.2 to 8 have been acquitted. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the O.Ps. Mr. Saroj Kumar and learned counsel for the State Mr. Bipin Kumar and perused the impugned order. It has been submitted that the State of 2 Bihar had filed Govt. Appeal (D.B.) No. 26 of 2010 against the impugned order which has been dismissed on merit vide order dated 29.6.2010 by a Division Bench of this Court and considering the facts and circumstances stated above, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. In the result, this application is dismissed. Mkr. ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)