IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN MONDAY, THE 7TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 16TH BHADRA 1931 WA.No. 254 of 2005() -------------------- AGAINSTJUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.37861/2003 Dated 17/08/2004 .................... APPELLANT(S): 1ST RESPONDENT: ----------------------------- P.M.NAFEESABI, D/O.P.I.KUNHAHAMMADKUTTY, NAGARAM AMSOM, DESOM, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS & 2ND RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------------- 1. P.MAMMAD KOYA HAJI, PAIKAT HOUSE, ERANHIKKAL P.O., KOZHIKODE.(DIED) 2. P.SATHAR, S/O. P.MAMMAD KOYA HAJI, PAIKAT HOUSE, ERANHIKKAL P.O., KOZHIKODE. 3. KOZHIKODE CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY, KOZHIKODE. ADDL. RESPONDENTS: 4. AYISUMMA, D/O.P.MAMMAD KOYA HAJI, RESIDING AT PAIKAT HOUSE, P.O.ERANHIKKAL, KOZHIKODE. 5. BASHEER, S/O.P.MAMMAD KOYA HAJI, .DO. .DO. 6. ASHRAF, .DO. .DO. 7. SABIRA, D/O.P.MAMMAD KOYA HAJI, .DO. 8. SULAIKHA, .DO. .DO. 9. RAHMA, .DO. .DO. 10. LUBAINA, .DO. .DO. (ADDL. RESPONDENTS ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DT.23.3.2007 IN I.A. NO.192/2007.) ADV. SRI.K.V.SOHAN FOR R1 & R2 SRI.R.SUDHISH FOR R1 & R2 SMT.SREEJA SOHAN.K. SRI.C.M.SURESH BABU,SC.KZD CORPN FOR R3 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. .................................................................... Writ Appeal No.254 of 2005 .................................................................... Dated this the 7th day of September, 2009. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Appeal is filed against judgment of the learned Single Judge directing the Corporation to grant licence temporarily to the first respondent to run business in the building owned by the appellant. Counsel for the appellant submitted that later the first respondent gave vacant possession of the building to the appellant. Consequently the direction issued by the learned Single Judge to grant licence temporarily is of no consequence for the appellant. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal as infructuous. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge V.K.MOHANAN Judge pms