IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 23.08.2010 COCP No.1655 of 2010 M/s Palbro Home Luxuries ...Petitioner Versus Shri Satish Chandra, Secretary, ...Respondent Department of Health and Family Welfare, Punjab, Chandigarh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The petitioner has installed fire fighting equipments at ESI Hospital, Amritsar. The writ petition filed by the petitioner was disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to decide the representation (Annexure P-4). It was not pointed out by the petitioner that ESI Hospital is managed by a statutory authority i.e. Employees State Insurance Corporation established under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 and not by the State Government. In view of the said fact, the direction given by this Court is incapable of implementation, as the State Government has no control over a Hospital established under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948. Consequently, the present contempt petition is dismissed as not maintainable. 23.08.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE