SINGLE BENGH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDiCATURE AT CHHATTISGARH - BiLASPUR W.P.No.:23^0/2005 ^ SHOBHFT RAM Gram: Dhed Kohka, P.0.: Kurutoia, Tah.: Charama, Block : Charama, Distt.: Kanker (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RES.PONDENTS: \^-^' (1) STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, '' T^ough the Prmcipal Secretary Anusuchit Jati Avum Anusuchit Janjati Kalyan Vibhag, State ofChhattisgarh, Mantralaya - Raipur A /. ^' / ^(T> COLLECTOR, Kanker, ^o /. ^ .^ <^' ^) PRINCIPAL, _ ^ Qy^^^ ^ ^' Govt. High School, Kurutola, .f..-*"^.€'•""'".^?"**'^ Block : Charama, Distt.: Kanker (Chhattisgar^,^^-'"'^^' ^...••'^ '' o..,. ^^>^ ov^-^e' !-<^ o- ^"G/ ^' -;??5" 'c ITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. r--- XI-HC-78 ^^F^K.ilrt^, tp-nl^+Kc, [qc^w^ V f 'p^ ^re^T a?HTq? /.-......-...-.. .r. .y........••^200 3TT^?Tq^cf)(qc|ij4^i) OT^^T^f^ri'^ ^T^TTOT^^T^^fcp Ij H' ,' i ;r\'" ^RTTWt ^Tf%?T 3TI^^T Agraw^ h^s 17.06.2005 Shri R.M. Solapurk^ Advocates for fhe petitioner. Shri Akhil State/respondents on advaa< Heard. Learaed counsel for petitioner is workin.g on fhe| Kurutola aad his salary years. This petition has beei fhe petitioner from July, 190) farther fUed for necessary work on the said post aad on the post of Peon. It is brought to tiie representation was given to Annexure-P/5 but tiie sajae Learaed couusel for present, fhis petition may b< petitioner to file a fresh re] aufhority aad the concei-n^ decide fhe representation wijl by this Court. Paael Lawyer for fhe |e copy. jftie petitioner subinits fhat fhe post of Peon ia fhe high school not been paid for the last six .<pi<4[c><n<'i^i+ic<>Y^Ts^S1 ><FJI<«|\ ^^f^RTW^^T ; ; wifh Shn R. VenkatraiuaQ., filed for disbursiiig the salaiy of \7 to Deceinber, 2004. It has been (^irection to aUow fhe petitioner to a|lso for regularization of fhe service notice of tbiis Court ftiat sorae ^he CoUector by fhe petitioner vide ^ias not been disposed of so far. petitioner subudts that for fhe disposed of with a Mberty to ftie >resentation before the concenied ?d auftiority inay be directed to jthin fhe stipiilated period graated tlie \dT^-qi<4irt^,tPTn<-l<l<?,l6|rtl'<-iy<< 8-^-- 3C _._ 'W<f, ^o, -2-S^IZ^^^_ _ _ _ • TF^T ^1*nq? ^200 3TI^5TtRra?(<3crf^g) 3TT^^T<PTf^TPF ^anan^STip^N ./:-" -,r Y/(JJJX <pi<ifo<Tlri +it+ioT^"(^^ <<RI^-CIK ^3Tl^T31T^^T This lunited prayer ias|de by leanied counsel for tiie petitioner is not opposedby le^med counsel for the State. The petitioner is permittjed to file a representation before fhe concemed autiiority wifh^a a period of one inonfh froni today along wifh a copy ofwri^ petition and a copy offhis order aad tf such representation is poiats raised by fhe petitione filed, fhe conipetent aufhority is directed to dispose of ftie ssjrae by reasoned order on each r as early as possible preferably wifh.ia a period of fhree uionfljis froni fhe date of filing of such representation. Witii ttie above observafions, fhis petition startds finaUy disposed of at titus stage, wjifli a liberty to fhe petitioner to come to fhis Court ^aia, if QUL Consequently, M.W.P. 4641/ 2005 also staad dispos^ Certi&ed copy as per rul^s. M^- y y S-P/FS/2005 - 20,000 ¥: ^ eventuality adses. No. 1907/2005 & I.A. No. dof. SdJ- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge