Petitioner Respontlents HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGAIIH: BttASPUR Writ Petition (St No. 4189 of2008 JeevanSingh Rajput, Sto. Shri Daya Singh Rajput, aged about 39 years, resident of village Bijatarai, Tehsil Mungeli, District Bilaspur (GG). Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh, threugh Secretary, Education DeparSient (Ministoy), D.K.S. Bhawan, Q£. Road,RaJpur(CG). 2) Deputy Director crf Publfe Instruction, EducaUon Departmert, Post OfRce— Pension Bada, Arvind Nagar Vlfard, ^iipur(eG5. (WritPetittonunderArticfe 226 ofthe Con^tution of hidia.) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Safish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri AlQkNigam, counselforth^petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Depufy Advocate Genwal with Srot. Suntta Jaln, PanetLawyer fertheState, J^ ORALORD6R (Passed on this t day of August, 2008) The paBtioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher by order dated 1-4-1991 (Annexure P/1) for a period from 1-4-1991 to 31-5- 1991 with a condition that Uie appointment is purely temporary amt the same wilf come to an end on 31-5-1991. It appears that »iepelittoner has not taken any steps ttiereafter, Ull the flUng of this peBtton on 29-7- 2008, praying that the r^pondents be directed to reinstate the psUtioner by gh/ing regular appointment. How the petiftmer can b8 reinstated in service, is not clear from the pteadings. 2) Th®appointment of U»peUtioner for a periad of tv»o months w> temporaiy basis de hore the constitutional scheme of emptoyment. The petitioner has preferred this petitioner after a period ef seventasn ysars -z- with explaining laches and delay, seeking a wrWelirection to Ihe r^pondent authorities to grant him reinslatemerrt. The pettBoner has feiled to establish whrther he has any right to ttw post or to be reinstated In seivlce as the appointment ttself was temporary fer a limited period of two months and <te hors the constitutional scheme of employment. The petiUon is vagueanddevoidofmerit 3) Accordingly, the petitionis dismissedsummarily. ^\^s^ ^^ s»^^e ^ ^ S|il<;!ina®!l ^^^S^^SeS^S^. :^SS^ MB^i^3KMbBBIiiiaka6 i&(^^!