IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2010 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 7680 of 2010() ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN BA.6731/2010 .................... (CRIME NO.461/2006 OF BALARAMAPURAM POLICE STATION RENUMBERED AS CRIME NO.335/CR/S1/2006 OF CBCID, SIG - 1, CFS POLICE STATION) ..... PETITIONER/5TH ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------ RAVEENDRANATH @ MOHANAN, UT NO.8161, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT JAIL, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.SUDHAKARAN, PAZHAVILA VEEDU, VENGANOOR DESOM, VIZHINJAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADVS. SRI.R.V.SUJIT KUMAR, SMT.SHERMIN S.S. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. 2. THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER, CBCID, KESAVADASAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAIL, ATTAKULANGARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. ........................................... Bail Application No. 7680 of 2010 ........................................................... Dated this the 1st day of December, 2010. ORDER Petitioner, who is the 5th accused in Crime No.461/2006 of Balaramapuram Police Station renumbered as Crime No.335/CR/SI/2006 of CBCID, SIG-1, CFS Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 489 (A), (B) and (C) IPC, seeks his enlargement on bail. The petitioner was arrested on 28.9.2010. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the Bail Application contending inter alia that the petitioner is also involved in yet another crime, in which the allegation is that he along with another person illicitly manufactured the counterfeit currency notes. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioner and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE). ln