IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2582 of 2009 POONAM KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 26.02.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the impugned order canceling the appointment of the petitioner dated 31.10.2008 cannot be sustained in the eye of law only on the ground that such order of termination has been passed by the Child Development Project Officer, Sanjhauli, District-Rohtas without issuing any show cause notice. Since the order of termination passed by the C.D.P.O under the guidelines issued by the Government, is appellable before the Collector of the District this Court for the time being will not interfere with the impugned order and would give liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Collector of the Rohtas within a period of one month from today. In the event, the petitioner files an appeal before the Collector of the Rohtas District along with the copy of this order, the same must be disposed of by the speaking order within a period of three months thereafter. It is made however clear that till the disposal of the appeal of the petitioner, the post held by the petitioner shall not be filled up. With the aforementioned observation/direction, this writ application is dismissed. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)