SSK/934 1 appp.568.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 568 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1661 OF 2010 V. D. Indapurkar & Ors. ....Applicants. Versus S. N. Gaikwad & Ors. ...Respondents. Shri O. A. Siddiqui, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Yashpal Thakur i/b. M/s. Paras Kuhad & Associates, Advocate for respondent nos. 1, 2, 4 to 10, 13 to 15, 20 to 23. Shri D. P. Adule, APP for the State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 18th NOVEMBER, 2011. P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. The application is taken out for restoration of the above Criminal Application No.1661 of 2010. The said application was dismissed, in view of the Order dated 5th August, 2011. By the said order, the applicants were directed to take steps for service of notice upon respondent nos. 3, 11, 12, 16 to 19 within four weeks, and if no steps are taken within the stipulated time, the application would stand dismissed without any further reference to the Court. The applicants could not serve these respondents and as stated above the matter was dismissed. SSK/934 2 appp.568.2011 3. Since respondent nos. 3, 11, 12, 16 to 19 did not put their appearance in the above revision, their presence for the purpose of disposal of this application may not be necessary. The applicants have given reasons in Paras 4, 5 and 6. The reasons, in my views, are sufficient to restore the above criminal application. In addition to this, learned counsel for the applicants, also makes a statement that he will serve those unserved respondents within a period of eight weeks from today. In view of the reasons stated above, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). 2. Criminal Application No. 1661 of 2010 is restored to file and Office is directed to issue fresh notice to respondent nos. 3, 11, 12 and 16 to 19 returnable on 20th January, 2011. (RANJIT MORE, J.)