SINGLE BMCH \?\ §m G /" / . wa § IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w‘ C67 2 a? w.P. (S) No. g? T} é /2oo9 PETITIONER / Anuj Ram Banjare, aged about 49 years, S/o. Late S.R. Banjare, Occupation Principal Government Higher Secondary School Amora, Block Patharia. Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS /l) State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur. 2) District Education Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR i ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT WRITS ORDER ORDERS DIRECTION]DIRECTIONS etc. The petitioner most respectfully begs to submit asunder :- 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER:- As mentioned above in theCause Title. cgaQ U 2 PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As mentioned above in the Cause Title. \“N.. .. EIGH COURT OF WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 5776 of 2009 ETITIONER RESPGNDEN?S Respenéaiis. ‘ @RBER GRAL) (Passed 0n 08‘ day ofOctober, 2099) impugmd order dated been n‘ansfm'ed from Disirict Bimspur‘ Smt Vida its order dated km: CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPUR Amij Ram Banjare. VERSUS Sm’ie cf CMiamsgarh & moths: 1. Leamed counsei appearing for the petiiioner submits that vide the 30m Jane, 2009 (Aimexure WI); the peziiioner has Gwemment Higher S€condary School, Paihayia £0 Govennnem Higher Secoedmy Se‘neol, Lalpm‘, Police Staiion Loam, mvei’ posted at Goveimnent Higher Seconiimy Schooi: Paiharia, i1} fact, he was posted at Govemment Higher Secondaly School; Amora. Thereafier, a coke-Chen was made by the District Education Officer; 09th Juiy, 2009 (Annemra P/Z) by inserting ”(Amora)” after the word “Patharia”: which is hot permissible under . Siddique famwr submits that the getitioner was 2:3. 2. The petitioner has net chaiie§1ged the impugned transfer ordar 0n any pemiissibie groumi i.e. proved mala‘ha’e, non—competence of authority der and mt being in confonnity with the stamteiy passing the irzmsfer or rubs and i‘egulations. \\ N SB: iitm’ble Shx‘i Sam's}: K. A nihatri J. Present: Sim Hamida Siddique, Advecaie for ihe petitionen Sbri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate Geaera} for the State/ P Shri Thakur, {eamed Deputy Advocate Gemini} a§3pearing for the Statefreswndents submits that it appears thai there is some clerical misstake in the impugned transfer arder dated 30m June; 2009 (Axmexure P/l), Admii‘iediyg the petitiener was posted in the Government Higher Secoedaiy School, Amora. Shr§ Thaliur fmther submizs that appropria‘ie order making 11ecessaiy con‘ections slum be passed by the respondent a‘uthea'itiee in respect oftransfer of the petiticner. In View of Que above, according to Earned counse} appearing f0? me petitioner, nethizig survives for adjudica’iien at ihis stage. Accordiiigiy, the petition is éisposed of. However, in the facts situation of the case, the peiicioner shail eontioue at his pi‘esem piaee of postieg i.e. at Govemment Higher Secondary School, Amore, Bilaspur, till the amended order is passeé: by the reepondents.