^ ^ e ^ IN THE HI6H CQURT OF JUDICATURE AT <IABALPUR pil, WRIT PETITION No. _/2000. (NRIT PETITION UNDER ARTIGLE 226/227 OF THE COMSTITUTION ON INDIA) PARAKH S/o Shri SHITALCHAND PARAKH aged aboufc 47 years^ R/o ll^ PanchshsBl Nagar, Raiptir^ Districtgt Raipur CMP) .PETITIONERs //Versus// 1. RftIPUR DEVELOPNENT AUTHORITY, A Body incorporated ursder the provisions of Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tafcha. Qram Nivesh Adhiniy-asn^ 1973g haviog it"*s office B»E» Road 3, Ra1 pur Di-strict^ Raipur (MFS)« 2»-THE CHZEF EXECUTZVE OFFSCER, Raipur Development Authority^ G»E« Road^ Raipur •Di%tt«Raipur (MP). 3. Th^ Revenue Officar^ (Tah-s-i.1dar) Raipur Dsvelap^ient Authority's Raipur Distt^Raipur.(MP)» .RESPONDENTas WRIT 'PETITION ^RTICLE 22&/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION ON INSZA '^' '-ilia^ yj ^fefife^ 51 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR WRIT PETmON No. 1912 of2000 PETmONER : Sharad Pm-akh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Raipur Development Authority & Others. WR1T PETITION L'NDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITLTION OFINDIA SB: Hon'Me Siin SatishJC.AgmlM)tn,A ^ Preseiit: None fbr the petitioner. :^ ' Sliri Kshitij Shamia, Advocate for the- respondents. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed orx 28th day of Qctober, 2010) The matter is called for hearing. None appears nor is any represeiitation made on behalf of the petitioner. The . petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution, Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to tlie petitioner, forthwith. | Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Anin