HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH C.R.P.NO.2535 OF 2008 Dt.12.11.2010 Between: Grandhi Bangarutalli ..Petitioner And Singamsetty Lakshmanbabu and another ..Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH C.R.P.NO.2535 OF 2008 ORDER: Notice has been served on the 1st respondent and the notice sent to the 2nd respondent returned with an endorsement as ‘not claimed’. Therefore, the said notice is sufficient service of notice. Petitioner herein is the plaintiff, who filed O.S.No.5 of 2001 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Narsipatnam, for specific performance of sale agreement, dated 16.4.1998. The application filed by the petitioner for reopening the case in I.A.No.542 of 2007 was dismissed with one word order dated 20.2.2008 as follows: “I.A.543/07 dismissed. Hence this petition also dismissed” I am of the opinion that the said dismissal order without assigning any reasons is illegal and unsustainable. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, without going into the merits of the case, the order under revision is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the court below to consider and pass a reasoned order in I.A.No.542 of 2007 in accordance with law. The civil revision petition is accordingly allowed. No order as to costs. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. 12.11.2010 kpr