J. 2. ^ 3. 4. /' ^\^e^'-£:f'^ ^Na.^-^-^G^/^,5^^ ?n'u'^s^:l-^R>" ^ae^^—"""""" IN THE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) No.rJ l^ /2010 ^ TH^((tt Vinod Kumar Dewangan, S/o- Shri Chandrabhan Dewangan., Aged about 38 years, R/o- Juna Bilaspur, Devangan Mohalla, Ward No. 27, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER VERSUS National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. Through-General Manager, Seepat Super Thermal Power Project, P.0. & Tehsil- Seepat, District-Bilaspur, C.G.. Deputy General Manager^ Seepat Super Thermal Power Project, N.T.P.C. Ltd. P.0. & Tehsil- Seepat, District-Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, Collector, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Land Acquisition Officer, lilaspur, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURITOT MANDAMUS XI-HC—78 ^n^T ^i f^rbF "^sn ^n'^T s»)*ii°^ ~3~^r ^j^jKn^, ^Til^4i<o, [^<yii<4^< ifTO^I ^»HJcb , l<sj<y1iyy ^..^Poo 3TI^T Tra^ (1°1^<^) 'F^TW^rf^ ^T^T (S.B: HON'BLE JUSTICE MR. ftRITINKER DIWAKER 15.12.2010 Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Shri B.D.Guru, Advocate f< Shri Praveen Das, Deputj the State/respondent No. 3 and 4. Heard. The grievance of the petit land of the petitioner, bearing k| acres, situated at village Janj Revenue Inspector Circle, Seejpat acquired by the State authoritie^ and 2 in the year2004. Till date,| given appointment in lieu of acquf Learned counsel for the ^dvocate for the petitioner. )rthe respondent No. 1 & 2. Government Advocate for date, no order has been passedj filed by the petitioner. He submit^ be served if a direction is issue representation dated 15.01.2009 '^N<OTh tTFT^f S fe^ <P»l^l< ^ 3tfiR3nt^T oner is that the agricultural lasra No. 197/7, area 0.10 i, Patwari Halka No. 27, t, District Bilaspur, was for the respondent No. 1 the petitioner has not been isition of his land.<- petitioner submits that till on various representations that ends of justice would d for deciding the pending (Annexure P/6). ^^ ,.^K%^ :i^, "'^, •T-l':;'^^^;:": '^rl ^ •^3?XI|HC-78 -'^.-^s^^' ^n^i ^T f^yw ^T^TI ^fT^T^Tyw Amit iflH^S (b*1( T'sr r^NI<<1^,yxn^l<o, f^fRTgl: „^P0,a2.4o 2^- 3^TXT?^ ( yiI^<^T) ^nw^ftcT ^n^T Shri Guru, learned respondent No. 1 and 2 submi^ a fresh representation and t^ considering all the aspects ofth^ case. In view of the above, th^j of with a direction to the representation before the resp<| period of three weeks from| respondent No. 1 and 2 shal further period of two months. It is made clear that this opinion on the merits of th( concerned would be at liberty to| the petitioner, in accordance wit ^N<?r?ih tTm^t^ fe^ Tf^K IFT 3tfW 3TT^T cj3unsel appearing for the that let the petitioner make (e same would be decided case. present petition is disposed ^etitioner to make a fresh )ndent No. 1 and 2 within a today, and in turn, the decide the same within a pourt has not expressed any case and the authorities decide the representation of :h law. Sd/- pritinker D'waker judge i-