FAO No.3399 of 2006 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.3399 of 2006 Date of Decision. 14.01.2011 Tilak Raj son of Bishan Dass and others ......Appellants Versus Raj Parminerjit Singh and others ......Respondents Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the appellants. None for the respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is at the instance of the owner of the vehicle, which was involved in the accident. Two cases are reported to have been disposed of on the same day and recovery rights granted in an appeal filed at the instance of the owner in FAO No.2996 of 2005. This Court has already accepted the driving licence produced as genuine and has allowed the appeal. 2. Learned counsel also states that in view of the finding already rendered in the connected case, the appeal in this case also has to be allowed. The insurance company has been served but none has appeared. FAO No.3399 of 2006 -2- 3. The award passed by the Tribunal is modified to the above extent and the appeal is allowed. The insurance company is bound to satisfy the award and indemnify the appellant also. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE January 14, 2011 Pankaj*