IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2623 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: January 24, 2011. Baldeva ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus Hindu Khandan Mushtarkha Devat Ram Banarsi Lal. ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Petitioner in person with Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate Respondent in person with Mr. Jatinder J.C.Nagpal, Advocate. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside impugned order dated 11.11.2009, passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kaithal, Annexure P1 vide which the application of petitioner for ordering for removing of the entries of attachment from revenue record was declined. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. CR No.2623 of 2010 It has been contended by learned counsel for the respondent that parties have settled the dispute and the decree passed in favour of respondent has already been satisfied and that hence, respondent has no objection if the present revision petition is accepted and the impugned order passed by learned Executing Court is set aside and the entries of attachment effected by rapat No.149 dated 22.07.1991 is ordered to be removed. Hence, in view of these facts, the present revision petition is accepted and the impugned order, Annexure P1 passed by learned Executing Court is set aside. The aforementioned order of attachment of land of the petitioner/Judgment Debtor is, hereby, ordered to be vacated. The present revision petition is disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) January 24, 2011. JUDGE 'om' 2