THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU APPEAL SUIT No.1093 OF 1992 DATED: 09-03-2010 Between: Mandava Srinivasa Rao. .....APPELLANT AND Mandava Suguna Kumari. .....RESPONDENT ORDER It appears from the docket that when the matter appeared on 11-12-2007, none appeared and therefore it was directed to be posted on 20-12-2007 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. On 25-02-2008 none appeared and therefore the matter was directed to be posted after four weeks. Again on 24-03-2008, none appeared and the matter was directed to be deleted from the caption ‘for dismissal’ and to be posted before appropriate bench. Again when the matter appeared on 22-10-2009 none appeared on either side and it was directed to be posted next week. On 02-03-2010 also none appeared and therefore the matter was directed to be posted on 08-03-2010 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Even today, when the matter is called, neither the appellant is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. That itself shows that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter. 3. Accordingly, Appeal Suit is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ C.V.RAMULU,J 09th March, 2010 Tsy