SM 1 902.ao.403.11.ca.569.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 403 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 569 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 403 OF 2011 Mrs. Sangita Thomsan Paul ....Appellant Versus The Mumbai Municipal Commissioner and others ....Respondents ____________ Shri. Hemand P. Ghadigaonkar for the Appellant. Mrs. K. K. Saraan for the Respondent-BMC CORAM: J. H. BHATIA, J. DATED : 6 TH JULY, 2011. P.C.: The Plaintiff/Appellant had filed Suit No. 644 of 2011 challenging the order under Section 354-A to stop work and therein, he had taken out Notice of Motion for temporary injunction. Ad-interim relief was refused and therefore, the Plaintiff has filed the present Appeal. 2. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff/Appellant, on instructions, makes a statement that the offending structure i.e. the wall, has been already demolished by the Plaintiff himself. If it is SM 2 902.ao.403.11.ca.569.11 so, nothing survives in the Suit as well as in the Appeal. In case, the Municipal Corporation finds any unauthorised construction, it can take action as per law. 3. The Appeal and Application shall stand disposed of accordingly. (J. H. BHATIA, J.)