IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1146 OF PETITION NO.1146 OF PETITION NO.1146 OF 2006 Rashtravati Suraksha Rakshak ..Petitioner General Kamgar Union Vs. The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay & Thane District & ors..Respondents Mr. Susheel Mahadeshwar i/b. Ranjana Todankar for the Petitioners. Ms. Lata Desai i/b. Pallavi Divekar, for respondent No.1. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: DATE: DATE: 13TH NOVEMBER,2006 13TH NOVEMBER,2006 13TH NOVEMBER,2006 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. The limited relief prayed for is that the petitioners are representing the guards listed at Exh.A. It is the case of the petitioner that they are working with the respondent No.2 and Respondent No.2 is not registered with the respondent No.1. 2. Considering the limited relief the guards whose names are listed at Exh.A to apply to the respondent No.1 for registration within four weeks from today. On such application being received the respondent No.1 to decide the same according to law at any rate not later than eight weeks from the date of receipt of such application. With the above observation petition stands disposed of. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA J). V. MOHTA J). V. MOHTA J).