BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16102 of 2011 1 V.N.PALANISAMY 2 P.JAYAMOORTHY 3 P.ARULSELVAM 4 C.SHANMUGAM ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 to 4 Vs STATE, REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, KARUR. (CR.NO.35/11) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.V.KATHIRVEL SENIOR COUNSEL FOR S.SURESH For Respondent : M/S.C.RAMESH Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 193, 420, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468 and 471 of I.P.C. in Crime No.35 of 2011 and seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been arrayed as A1 to A4 and they have been implicated on the allegation that A1 to A3 are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.632 of 2007 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Karur, filed a bogus "Muchalika" which was marked as Ex.A16 and the said document has been witnessed by the fourth petitioner/A4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they have been falsely implicated in this case. 3. Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioners have been arrayed as A1 to A4 and they have been implicated on the allegation that A1 to A3 are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.632 of 2007 filed a bogus "Muchalika" which was marked as Ex.A16 and the said document has been witnessed by the fourth petitioner/A4. It is submitted that the investigation is pending. 4. It is seen that the petitioners have been implicated on the allegation as stated above. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Karur, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Judicial Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 5.30 p.m. for a period of three weeks and thereafter, they shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, KARUR 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARUR 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH,KARUR +1. CC to M/S. S.SURESH Advocate SR.No.44439 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16102 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 SMA/20.12.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/