IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10609 OF 2009 DATE OF DECISION: October 05, 2009. Parties Name Mamta ..PETITIONER VERSUS Union of India and others ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Brijeshwar Singh, Adv., for UOI- respondent No.1 Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Adv., for respondents No. 2 and 3. JASBIR SINGH, J.(oral) ORDER. On July 20, 2009, following order was passed by this Court: “Application of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground that Postal Order for Rs. 100/-, enclosed with her application, was not proper. Perusal of copy of the postal order Annexure P13 indicates that it was issued in the name of Senior Divisional Retail Sales Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited. Tentatively, this Court does not find any fault with the postal order. Notice of motion 5.10.2009. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10609 OF 2009 -2- The petitioner be allowed to appear for interview provisionally subject to ultimate outcome of this writ petition. Copy of the order be supplied to counsel for the petitioner under signatures of the Court Reader for compliance.” Counsel for the parties state that in response to the order, mentioned above, the petitioner was interviewed and as per result declared, her name figures at Sr. No. 2. If that is so, this writ petition has become infructuous. If the petitioner is not satisfied with the selection, he may lay challenge to the same as per norms. Disposed of. (JASBIR SINGH) JUDGE October 05, 2009. DKC