^6r HIGH COOTtTOF CHHATTISGARH, BI1A8PUR W.P(SlNo.74^ of 2007 PBTITIONBR Babulal, s/o Bisamilihar Gond, aged about 60 -i- years R/o viB^e, Korja, Tahsfl Gaurela, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G) ycrsus t^.- RESPOMDENTS 1. State of Chliattisgarh, thi-ougli ffae Secretaiy, Public Works Departiaent, Mantrala^'a, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2. Superintendmg Engmeer, PubUc Worbs Departm.ent, Bilaspur, Distt Bilasplir 3. Executive Engiueer, Public Works Departaient, Pendra Division, Pendia Road, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G) WRIT PETITION UB[DER AKnCLE 236 OF THE COHSTITinOB OFINDIA ApBearance: Shn N.K.Chatterjee, counsel for the petitioTier. Shri Suineet Verma, P.L. appears for tjhe State/ respondents. ORAL ORDER (17.12.2007) SUmL KUMAR SIMHA. J. Heard. Leamed counsel for the petitioner subnuts that a permanent Gang-nian is to be retired at the age of62 years in acconlance with the Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhmaj^hiki-AyiJt) Adhimyain. 7967 read with Pundamental Rules, 56. He also subinits that the point raised has heen decided by this Court inlbateli ofmatters i.e. W.P.No. 1.08/2005 and many other connected matters on 04.01.2007, reported in 3007 (2) C.G.LJ. 39 HSottind & others Vs. Skate of C.G.) and this matter is squarely covered by that decision, which m.ay be disposed ofon the sanie tenns. W.P.CS).No.7445/2007 Leamed coiinsel for the State fairly agrees that this mattcr is covered toy the said decision. However, hc sutianits that in some matters the State has ffled writ appeals. Unless sonie interun orier is passed, inerely on acconnt of filing offlie writ appeal, hearing ofthis writ petition cannot he kept in abeyance, when the matt.er is sqiiarely coverRd hy the said judginent. In the result, this petition is allowed. It is disposed of in terms of the orrtcr dated 04.1.2007 in W.P. No. 108/2005 and other connected matfcers. No ->———,_ ordcr as to costs. gd/. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge | /Rao/