IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 29TH JANUARY 2008 / 9TH MAGHA 1929 Crl.MC.No. 354 of 2008() ---------------------------- PETITIONER: PETITIONERS/COMPLAINANT ----------------------------------- 1. VIJAYAN, S/O.LATE SIVARAMAN, ALACKOMOLEL HOUSE, MAZHUVANNOOR KARA, AIRAPURAM VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. 2. KRISHNANKUTTY, S/O.LATE SIVARAMAN, ALACKAMOLEL HOUSE, MAZHUVANNOOR KARA, AIRAPURAM VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. 3. MOHANDAS, S/O.LATE SIVARAMAN, ALACKAMOLEL HOUSE, MAZHUVANNOOR KARA, AIRAPURAM VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.SUNILKUMAR RESPONDENTS: STATE ------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNNATHUNADU POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DIST. THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PERUMBAVOOR. 3. THE RURAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, ALUVA. BY ADV. SRI.K.S. SIVAKUMAR, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.M.C.No.354 of 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 29th day of January, 2008 ORDER The petitioners, who are the complainants in Annexure A1 complaint alleging cognizable offences, seeks a direction to the respondents to register a crime and commence investigation. 2. The remedy of the petitioner is not to approach this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C in the light of the recent pronouncement of the Apex Court in Sakiri Vasu v. State of Uttar Pradesh and others 2007(13)SCALE 693. Hence, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of, leaving the petitioner to the remedy of filing a petition under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C or by preferring a private complaint under Section 190 read with 200 Cr.P.C. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj