IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.800 of 2007 Ram Prasad Saha son of Late Ratan Saha, resident of village Kuwari Ladhi Bhita, P.O. Kuwarigali Ladhi, P.S. Dhandaha, District Purnia. ……….. Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Bank of India through its Chief General Manager, Local Head Office, West Gandhi Maidan, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, Patna. 2. The General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna. 3. The Assistant General Manager (PPG), State Bank of India, Local Head Office, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna. 4. Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Birpur Branch, P.O. & P.S. Birpur, District- Saharsa. ………. Respondents. ----------- 03 23.01.2009 The petitioner states that having superannuated from defence service he was empanelled for employment in the State Bank of India. Initially he was given temporary employment, which continued up to his superannuation from the State Bank of India. In the mean time, he was given permanent appointment, but on his superannuation he has been denied retiral benefits primarily on the ground that he was over age to join any pension fund scheme. When he was confirmed in employment with State Bank of India and accordingly not having joined any pension fund scheme, he was not entitled to any other retiral dues. In my view, these questions can only be settled in a proceeding duly constituted in terms of Industrial Disputes Act, who may take appropriate action for quantification of his entitlement. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Trivedi/ ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)