IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9803 of 2011 Date of Decision: November 02, 2012 Ram Murti through his L.Rs. & others ...Petitioners Versus The Commissioner, Patiala Division, Patiala & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Harjot Singh Bedi, Advocate, for Mr.Amit Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Sandeep Goyal, Addl.A.G.Punjab, for the State. Mr.Umesh Kumar Kanwar, Advocate, for respondent Nos.3 & 4. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The counsel for the parties appearing in this case state before the court that the parties have reached a compromise. In this view of the matter, the present writ petition is rendered infructuous. The parties shall be bound by the terms and conditions of the compromise. In case, still any one of the parties backs out to the compromise, the concerned party would be at liberty to seek revival of the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. November 02, 2012 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE