IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.3572 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:11.10.2010 Sukhpal Singh ...Appellant Versus Hardev Singh alias Deba and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. S.S.Narula, Advocate, for the appellant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. The plaintiff is in second appeal against the judgment and decree of the Courts belo w by which his suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering in the disputed plot about 21 Marlas, situated in village Jhabhal Kalan (Pacca Kalan), Pati Bale Ki, Tehsil Tarn Taran, District Amritsar, has been dismissed. While upholding the finding of fact recorded by the learned Trial Court, the learned First Appellate Court had observed that the plaintiff has failed to prove his ownership over the plot in dispute. He could not prove its dimensions and even the area. A concurrent finding of fact has been recorded by the learned First Appellate Court against the plaintiff with regard to the question of his possession over the plot in dispute which could not be explained by learned counsel for the appellant in this appeal. Moreover, it is now well settled that the second appeal is maintainable only on a substantial question of law as envisaged under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, but in the present case, no substantial question of law is argued by learned counsel for the appellant. In view thereof, I do not find any merit in the present appeal and as such, the same is hereby dismissed in limine. No costs. October 11, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE