IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.DENESAN MONDAY, THE 18TH DECEMBER 2006 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 31599 of 2006(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ N. UNNIKRISHNA PILLAI,S/O.KESHAVA PILLAI AGED 38 YEARS, VAZHAYILKEZHAKATHIL HOUSE, EEREZHA SOUTH P.O., CHITTIKULANGARA,MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-690106, WORKING AS PEON- CUM-CHOWKIDAR (GROUP D), OFFICE OF THE DIST.YOUTH CO-ORDINATOR, NEHRU YUVA KENDRA SANGATHAN,KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.PREMCHAND SRI.DILSHA PREMCHAND RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, NEHRU YUVA KENDRA SANGATHAN, EAST PLAZA, INDIRA GANDHI INDOOR STADIUM, NEW DELHI. 2. THE ZONAL DIRECTOR, NEHRU YUVA KENDRA SANGATHAN (KERALA ZONE), NEAR PRESS CLUB, TRIVANDRUM-695001. 3. THE DISTRICT YOUTH CO-ORDINATOR, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT YOUTH CO-ORDINATOR, NEHRU YUVA KENDRA SANGATHAN, COLLEGE JUNCTION, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.T.P.SAJID,(ACGSC) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.K.DENESAN, J ------------------------------- W.P.(C)NO. 31599 of 2006 ------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of December, 2006 JUDGMENT Heard Sri.R.Premchand for the petitioner and Sri.T.P.Sajan for the respondents. 2.The petitioner is an employee holding a Group D post under the respondents. Presently, he is working at Kollam. As per order dated 24.11.2006, the respondents have transferred him from Kollam to Thiruvananthapuram. Feeling aggrieved by the order of transfer, the petitioner has approached this Court. 3. During the pendency of the writ petition, he filed Ext.P8 representation before the Zonal Director, respondent No.2. Facts and circumstances which compelled the petitioner to seek orders from the second respondent to allow him to continue at Kollam have been stated in Ext.P8. It is unnecessary for this Court to reproduce those facts in this judgment as I have no reason to assume that the second respondent will not look into Ext.P8. Since, primarily, it is the duty of the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P8, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition issuing appropriate directions to the second respondent. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the W.P.(C)No.31599/2006 2 second respondent to consider Ext.P8, take appropriate decision and communicate the same to the petitioner within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K.K.DENESAN, JUDGE css/ W.P.(C)No.31599/2006 3