HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIELF JUSTICE SRI B.PRAKASH RAO & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.SURI APPA RAO W.A. No.731 of 2010 Dated 16-11-2010 Between: Smt. G.Laxmamma and two others. ……..Petitioners Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Cyberabad and others. ………Respondents HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIELF JUSTICE SRI B.PRAKASH RAO & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.SURI APPA RAO W.A. No.731 of 2010 JUDGMENT (Per HACJ): Heard Sri Janardhana Rao, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants, learned Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for the respondent No.4, who took notice in respect of their respondents and at their request, the main appeal is taken up for disposal. 2. The appellants are the unsuccessful writ petitioners. In W.P.No.16740 of 2010, they sought to invoke the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, i n te r alia, seeking Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in not taking action against the complaint, dated 12- 06-2010 for grant of police aid, as illegal. The learned Single Judge by taking into account the nature of claims and the disputes arose between the appellants and the third parties in respect of the title, ownership and also the possession of the agricultural lands to an extent of Ac.7.23 gts. In Sy. No.406 part, Ac.4.17 gts. In Sy. No.418 and Ac.4.00 gts. In Sy. No.419, situated at Dundigal village, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, felt that necessarily it falls for a remedy by filing any appropriate application before the Civil Court rather than approaching this Court and accordingly dismissed the writ petition. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ appeal has been filed. 3. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants also filed suits which are pending before the learned Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, wherein interim injunction was also granted in their favour. It is also submitted that the appellants have already filed interlocutory applications in the said suits seeking impleadment of police protection. But no orders have been passed so far till today. 4. Having heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the material, it is clear that admittedly there is a civil dispute between the appellants and the third parties, who are not made as parties in the writ petition, as regards the subject lands. All these facts will certainly lead to the jurisdiction of Civil Court under common law rather than approaching extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court. In the circumstances, the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge does not call for any interference by this Court. We do not find any merits in this appeal. 5. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed. However, we leave it open to the appellants to proceed with the suits filed before the Civil Court by filing appropriate applications, if already not filed, and seek appropriate orders on the said applications. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, HACJ Date: 16th November 2010 ____________________ V.SURI APPA RAO,J kvr