IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12298 of 2003 PASHUPATI JHA, son of Shri Kamal Kant Jha, resident of Mohalla – Lalkothi, PO Tetarpur, PS Tetarpur, Distt. Bhagarlpur ….. …. Petitioner Versus 1. UNION OF INDIA through Secretary the Ministry of Small Scale Industries, Agriculture and Rural Industries, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi 2. Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi 3. The Deputy Adviser, IES Cell, Ministry of Economic Affairs, North Block, New Delhi 4. Additional Secretary cum Development Commissioner, Small Scale Industries, Nirman Bhawan, 7th Floor, 705, A Wing, Moulana Azad Road, New Delhi 5. Joint Secretary (Cadre Controlling Authority, IES Cell), Department of Economic Affairs, North Block, New Delhi 6. Shri Sri Ramappa 7. Shri Umana Sarangi 8. Shri Om Prakash Thakur 9. Shri K Hareeswaran 10. Shri V K K Nadimplli 11. Shri Ajay Pal Singh Sirohi 12. Shri N N Reji 13. Sri Rai Prasad Patnaik 14. Dr. Sunil Kumar Gupat 15. Shri Dinesh Kumar Sharma 16. Shri Ashok Kumar 17. Shri Hari Prasad Jaiswal 18. Shri Anil Kumar Singh 19. Shri Ashwani Kumar 20. Shri Biswa Bihari Panigrahi 21. Shri Ashok Kumar Jaiswal 22. Shri Bachangudi Shivanand 23. Shri A Paramasivan 24. Ms. Deepa G L 25. Shri R Shiva Shankar 26. Smt. Kahrinamma Sabastian 27. Shri Babu Lal 28. Shri Basudeo Das 29. Shri Arun Resith 30. Ms. N Panithavathy 31. Shri B Ramesh 32. Shri Dipak Jaldeo Meshram 33. Shri Meesala Kalabu 34. Shri Ajit Singh 35. Shri F Sivasubramanion 36. Shri Sukanth Kumar Sahoo 2 37. Shri Shadeb Mahmood 38. Shri Utpal Nath 39. Shri C Alagirisamy 40. Shri Anil Kumar Negi 41. The Registrar, C.A.T. Patna …. Respondents ----------- 05- 6.4.2010 Mr. Sanjiv Krishna Bariar for the petitioner, and Mr. Binay Kumar Pandey for the respondents are present. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 5.8.2003 (Annexure- 1), passed in OA No.302/2001 by Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief prayed for has already been granted to him departmentally which renders the writ petition infructuous. 2. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. ( S K Katriar ) ( Kishore K Mandal ) mrl