IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M. No.14881 of 2011 and C.W.P. No.18658 of 2011 Date of Decision.03.11.2011 Gee Tech Engineers Pvt. Ltd. .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohinder S. Nain, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) C.M. No.14881 of 2011 Application is allowed as prayed for. C.W.P. No.18658 of 2011 1. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks for permission for withdrawal of the writ petition for prosecuting the case before the Appellate Authority. 2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner says that he is willing to deposit 50% of the amount, which was assessed for prosecuting the appeal. The same be received and the case disposed of on merits. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 03, 2011 Pankaj*