IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.3601 of 2005 Date of Decision:12.07.2010 Kirpal Singh .... appellant Versus Sale Tehsildar, Panipat & Ors. .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Sandeep Ghanghas,Advocate for the appellant Mr.Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 and 2 Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3 **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): This is plaintiff's appeal challenging the judgment and decree of the Lower Appellate Court whereby appeal filed by the defendant-respondent against the decree of the trial Court was accepted and suit of the plaintiff-appellant for permanent injunction and declaration was ordered to be dismissed. Admittedly, plaintiff-appellant is in unauthorized possession of the suit land and respondent No.3 is the owner of the property in dispute. Thus, appellant is seeking protection of his alleged unauthorized possession against a true owner which is not permissible in view of the judgment in Sukhwant Singh vs. Divisional Forest Officer 2009(3) PLR 432. No substantial question of law arises for consideration. Dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 12.07.2010 neenu