1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5097 OF 2010 (Naresh Harishchandra Nagarmote vs. Prakash Kanhaiyalal Panpaliya & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. OCTOBER 20, 2010. Heard Shri Deshpande, learned counsel for the petitioner. In 2001 suit, application for amendment of written statement was moved on 03.07.2010 stating that the respondent – plaintiff is not an agriculturist and hence not entitled to purchase the land. The reason given is as the petitioner – defendant was an adolescent and unaware of worldly affairs, the plea could not be taken. The trial Court has applied its mind and found explanation not satisfactory. The agreement between parties is dated 20.12.2000 and in the suit filed on 13.08.2001, age of the petitioner – defendant is shown as 27 years. The petitioner – defendant has sworn an affidavit while filing reply before the trial Court on 12.10.2001 and in it also he has disclosed his age to be 27 years. I do not find any jurisdictional error or perversity. With liberty to the petitioner to challenge the 2 impugned order after the suit is finally decided, present writ petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.