IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45580 of 2008 KUSHESHWAR CHAUPAL, NARAYAN CHAUPAL & MOTI CHAUPAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.12.2008 Heard Sri Ajoy Kumar Chakraborty, Advocate for the petitioners, Sri Saghir Ahmad, Advocate for the Informant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The case has been registered under Section 366A/34 IPC. The allegation is equally made against nine accused persons that they picked up the minor daughter of the informant so as to getting her married to accused Dharmendra Chaupal @ Dharma Chaupal. The prayer for bail of Dharmendra Chaupal has been dismissed by me in another petition bearing Cr.Misc.Petition No.34046 of 2008. As regards the above named three petitioners, they have taken a specific plea of false implication on two reasons. It was contended by drawing the attention of the court to annexed FIR, i.e., Annexure-2 that accused Kusho Chaupal and Narayan Chaupal were witnesses against the informant’s nephew in a criminal case and that petitioner Moti Chaupal does not appear to be the family member of the accused - 2 - persons and is a co-villager. It is further contended that the rejection order indicates that three co-accused persons have been admitted to anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr.Misc.No.33435 of 2008. Regard being had to the facts of the case and the contentions and the defence, let the above named three petitioners be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in Manigachhi P.S.Case No.94 of 2008. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )