1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.174 OF 2010 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1154 OF 2009 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1154 OF 1998 Mr. Dilip Shankar Mulay .... Applicant Vs. Mr. Pradip Shankar Mulay .... Respondent Mr. Dilip Mulay, applicant in person. Ms. Leena Patil h/f Mr. M.S. Karnik, Advocate for respondent. Coram : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. Date : 11th April, 2011 P.C. 1. Civil Application No.174 of 2010 is filed by the original plaintiff raising disputes as regards the accounts that are filed by the respondent-defendant of the flour mill business run by him. The civil application is taken out in the appeal, which is disposed off by this Court by the order dated 13th January 1999. While dismissing the appeal from order, this Court directed respondent no.1 to maintain the accounts of flour mill in his possession and to submit the accounts quarterly to the trial Court. There is no dispute that respondent no.1 has accordingly been submitting quarterly accounts in the trial Court. The dispute raised is about the correctness of the accounts. It appears that the trial Court 2 has not been considering the objections as regards the accounts only because the direction to maintain the accounts has been given by this court. The directions given are general directions for submission of the accounts. Because of the directions, it cannot be said that only dispute as regards the correctness of the accounts submitted from time to time cannot be considered by the trial Court. It is obvious from the facts and circumstances of the case that these accounts will have to be taken into account at the time of final hearing of the partition suit. The civil application is accordingly disposed off. In view of disposal of this civil application, Civil Application No.97 of 2010 does not survive, the same is accordingly disposed off. (SMT.R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J) 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.97 OF 2011 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.174 OF 2011 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1513 OF 2009 Mr. Dilip Shankar Mulay .... Applicant Vs. Mr. Pradip Shankar Mulay .... Respondent Mr. Dilip Mulay, applicant in person. Ms. Leena Patil h/f Mr. M.S. Karnik, Advocate for respondent. Coram : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. Date : 11th April, 2011 P.C. This civil application is for expeditious hearing of the suit within time bound schedule. The applicant states that the learned District Judge, Thane in the year 2005 has already expedited the hearing of the suit. In view of this statement, no further directions of expeditious hearing are required to be given by this Court. The application is dismissed. (SMT.R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J)