IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.226 of 2010 RAM BINOD THAKUR SON OF LATE MANI THAKUR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SUKHPUR, P.S. AND DISTRICT SUPAUL. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, SAHARSA. 3. THE OFFICER –N- CHARGE SUPAUL POLICE STATION DISTRICT SUPAUL. 4. KAMESHWAR THAKUR, SON OF BENE LAL THAKUR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – SUKHPUR, P.S. AND DISTRICT SUPAUL. ----------- 02. 09.12.2010 Heard the parties. The prayer of the petitioner is that the concerned respondent be directed to protect the life and property of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer of the petitioner and submits that no direction can be given in absence of fundamental duties. In the above circumstances, it will be open of the petitioner to take remedial measures provided under the Civil/criminal law. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)