[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.1854 OF 2008 Kamaruddin Amaruddin Ansari ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Through Jail Mr.R.R.Mahagaonkar Advocate for Applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 10, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 10, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 10, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate (appointed) for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in CR No.394 of 2004 of Sakinaka Police Station, Mumbai. The said CR pertains to Sessions Case No. 11/2005 which is pending before the Sessions Court at Mumbai. The said case is under M.C.O.C. Act. 3. The learned APP states that the trial in the said case has commenced and eight witnesses have already been examined. Looking to this fact, I am [-2-] not inclined to grant bail at this stage. Application is rejected. In case trial is not concluded by 30.11.2008, liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for bail. Office to communicate this order to the applicant who is in jail. 4. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]