IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM MONDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2011 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 837 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.1074/2011 Dated 19/01/2011 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN W.P.C. ------------------------------------------------------------- GEOGY VARGHESE,AGED 45 YEARS,S/O.VARKEY, CHINGAMPARAMBIL,INDUSTRIAL ESTATE P.O, CHANGANASSERY AND MANAGING PARTNER OF M/S. ORIENT HARDWARES & SANITATIONS,AMALA COMPLEX, BYE PASS ROAD, NEAR RAILWAY STATION, CHANGANASSERY, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.AUGUSTINE JOSEPH SRI.K.S.ROCKEY RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN W.P.C. -------------------------------------------------------- AMMINI P.G,AGE AND HUSBANDS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER NOW WORKING AS THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, IST CIRCLE, COMMERCIALT AX OFFICE, CHANGANSSERY,KOTTAYAM 686101. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. RANI DIOTHIMA THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: MM Con.Case(C).No. 837 of 2011(S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE - 1 COPY OF THE 1ST PAGE OF THE REPRESENTATION WITH THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT DTD.7-1-2011 FROM THE RESPONDENT ANNEXURE -11 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19-1-2011 IN W.P.(C) NO. 1074/2011 ANNEXURE - 111 COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 03-6-2011 FROM THE RESPONDENT ANNEXURE - 1V COPY O F THE NOTICE DATED 30-6-2011 RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE MM C.K.ABDUL REHIM,J. --------------------------------- COC. No. 837 OF 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 19 th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T It is brought to my notice that in compliance of the judgment in the writ petition, fresh orders have been issued after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Even though , it is noticed that the compliance is not within the time stipulated in the judgment, I do not find any reason to proceed with further steps under the Contempt of Court Case. 2. However, liberty of the petitioner to challenge the fresh orders in appropriate proceedings is reserved. Accordingly, Contempt of Court Case is hereby closed. C.K.ABDUL REHIM JUDGE smm 2 3