t •" HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR S.B. : HON'BLEMR.SATISHK.AGNIHQTRt.J. WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3932 of2005 PETFTIONER KESPONDENT8 LalchanlaJ Kashyap S/o T.R.Kashyap Asstt. Teacher, Pratfamik Shala, Budhiyapali Korba (C.G) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarii tiirough the Secretary Department of School Education D.K.S Bhavan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Asstt. Commissioner Adivasi Vikas Korba. 3. Principal, Prathmik Budhiyapali Korba. Shala Present: Shri Manish Sharma, Miss Sunita Jaic, Advocates for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Ooverament Advocate for the State / respondente. ORDER w (Psssed ori 15m March 2007) 1. The petitioner, while worldng as Assistont Teacher at Goverament Prathmik Shala, Budhiyapali Korba, was fransfetTed to Frafhmik Shala Dhanpuri, on tfae same terms and conditioas vide impugned order dated 11.09.2001 (Anaexure A/l), 2. The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Raipur vide interim order dated 12.10.2001 directed to mamtaiii stetus quo in regard to the position of the petitioner as was prevailing on 03.10.2001. By virtue of tiie interim order the petitioner is continuing at the original plaee ofposting. 3. Be that as it may, with the iwssage of time this petition has become inlructuous as period of transfer is not applicable forever. At this point oftime, there is no question to examine tiie validity 6f the transfer order. However, Ae rsspondente are at liberty to pass appropriate order keeping in view Ae public interest and admmistrative exigency, without insisting on compliance oftfae impugned transfer order. 4. It is well settled prineipie of law that transfer is afl iacident of service and it is for the employer to decide as to where a particular officer/employee be posted, keeping in view public interest as well as administrative exigency. This Court has limited jurisdiction to interfere ia the transfer matter aad this Court can interfere only in the case of proved malafide, non- competence of authorily passing tfae transfer order and transfer order not being in conforaiity with the rules and regulations. 5. In view ofthe above, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Afflit , ^-i*l -^•1*;tb-^.^