IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2011 / 19TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26688 of 2011(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. NIKHIL JOY, 4D, SKYLINE MARBLE ARCH, JUDGES AVENUE, KALOOR, KOCHI-682017. 2. SACHIN TOM, NELLUVELIL HOUSE, MANJADI.P.O., TIRUVALLA-689105. 3. SHERIN MARIAM THOMAS, PULLICHERIL HOUSE, 27/4348, PERUMANOOR.P.O., KOCHI-682015. 4. NIDHISH BABU, VALIYATHARA KANJIRAKATTU HOUSE, PUTHENCRUZE.P.O., PUTHENCRUZE, ERNAKULAM-682308. 5. PAUL.K.THOMAS, KANNIMATTOM HOUSE, NEAR GRACE GARDENS THRIKKAKKARA.P.O., KOCHI-682021. BY ADV. SRI.B.RAGUNATHAN SRI.P.KARTHIKEYAN SRI.R.SRINATH SRI.NIKHIL GEORGE (PALAKKAPPILLIL) SRI.VIPIN VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. M.G. UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR, M.G.UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM-686560. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, M.G.UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM-686560. SC SRI.T.A.SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 26688 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DT. 4-10-2011 FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DT. 4-10-2011 FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DT. 4-10 2011 FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY 3RD PETITIONER. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF APPLICTION DT. 4-10-2011 FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DT. 4-10-2011 FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY 5TH PETITIONER. (True copy) P.A To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).26688/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 11th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of the failed subjects in the 6th semester B.Tech Examination vide Exts.P1 to P5 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within six weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs