1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.150 OF 2006 Omprakash Jaiswal & Ors. ..Petitioners. V/s. The Executive Engineer,(TC) MBR & RB & Ors. ..Respondents. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.151 OF 2006 Tukaram Gogare & Ors. ..Petitioners. V/s. The Executive Engineer,(TC) MBR & RB & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.A.A.Jadhav for petitioners. Mr.G.W.Mattos, AGP for respondent Nos.1,3 and 4. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : APRIL 27, 2006. DATE : APRIL 27, 2006. DATE : APRIL 27, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. After going through the records, I am of the view that no cause for initiating contempt action has been made out. Grievance that representation made by the petitioner has been rejected merely on the ground of delay in submitting the same is inappropriate. On perusal of the order, it is obvious that the 2 authority has considered representation on its own merits and rejected the same. If the petitioners are aggrieved by the decision so taken by the authority, it will be open to the petitioners to take recourse to such remedy as may be permissible by law. 2. It is pointed out by the counsel for the respondents that the petitioners have already challenged the adverse order passed against them by way of Writ Petition. This position is disputed by the counsel for the petitioners. It is not necessary to go into this controversy. 3. Petition disposed of on the above terms.