IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI MONDAY, THE 4TH APRIL 2011 / 14TH CHAITHRA 1933 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2939 of 2004(B) ------------------------------- CC.1113/2000 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-II (MOBILE) COURT, KOTTAYAM, CHENGANACHERRY CRA.23/2003 of ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, KOTTAYAM .................... REVN. PETITIONERS/APPELLANT/ACCUSED --------------------- K.M.THOMAS, KALLARACKAL HOUSE, VADUTHALA P.O., KOCHI-23. BY ADV. SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT & STATE OF KERALA --------------- 1. ANNAMMA JOHN, MANAMMEL HOUSE, PANACHIKAVE P.O., PERUNNA, CHANGANACHERRY. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.G.SUKUMARA MENON FOR R1 SRI.K.SURESH FOR R1 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.PUZHAKKARA MUHAMMED THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.C.HARI RANI, J * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P.No.2939 of 2004 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of April 2011 O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner/accused. No representation for the complainant/1st respondent. 2. Report is received from the office of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Changanassery that the revision petitioner herein/accused who was convicted for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act had already undergone substantive sentence and default sentence from 24/1/2005 till 23/3/2005. The same submission has been made by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner also. 3. Recording the report as well as the submission of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, this revision petition is closed. (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge Crl.R.P.No. 2 Crl.R.P.No. 3 Crl.R.P.No. 4 Crl.R.P.No. 5 M.C.HARI RANI, J Crl.R.P.No.504 of 2001 ORDER 17th DAY OF JUNE 2001 Crl.R.P.No. 6