IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1636 OF 2007 Smt.Kamal S. Patil & Ors. ....Petitioners V/s. Swastishri Jinsen Bhattarak Pattacharya . Mahaswami Mathsansthan, Kolhapur & Ors.....Respondents Mr.S.G. Karandikar for the Petitioners. Mr.P.S. Dani with Mr.P.M. Arjunwadkar for Respondent Nos.1 to 10. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 25TH JULY, 2007. P.C. : 1. The impugned order warrants no interference. The question of validity of the certificate under Section 88(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 will be decided in the proceedings already adopted by the Petitioners under the said Act. Therefore, it is not necessary for the issue to be raised in the Civil Court. 2. Even in the event of the suit being decreed, it will always be open to the Petitioners to adopt proceedings in accordance with law in respect thereof depending upon the outcome of the proceedings adopted by the Petitioners to challenge the certificate under Section 88(b) of the said Act. 3. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is dismissed.