1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8777/2009. (Yawal Tq. Sahakari Soot Girni Ltd. Yawal and Anr. Vs. Shri Vitthal Yamaji Warke (since deceased through L.Rs.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.PN Kutti, Adv. for petitioners. ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 27 th September, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) The grievance is, the order under challenge dated 23.01.2009 passed by the learned 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalgaon, in Misc. CA No. 77/1993 below Exhibit-76, is without jurisdiction. 3) The learned Judge has, in paragraph 5 of his judgment, assigned the reasons as to how the predecessor of the said Judge in para 11 has dealt with about the proceedings being governed by Arbitration Act, 1940. The writ jurisdiction, in fact situation, cannot 2 be exercised to shower benediction to the petitioners. The petitioners have other remedies, which they may resort to. Accordingly, Writ petition is disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/