IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 26TH BHADRA 1931 LA.App..No. 460 of 2008(D) -------------------------- LAR.127/2002 of SUB COURT, MANJERI .................... APPELLANT(S): 2ND RESPONDENT ---------------------------- AIRPORT DIRECTOR, AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, CALICUT AIRPORT, P.O.CALICUT AIRPORT. BY ADV. SRI.S.SUJIN RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS AND IST RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------- 1. ALUNGAL MOIDEENKUTTY, S/O.HASSANKUTTY, KONDOTTY VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. ALUNGAL BEERAN KUTTY, S/O.HASSANKUTTY, KONDOTTY VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. ALUNGAL MOHAMMED BASHEER, S/O.HASSANKUTTY, KONDOTTY VILLAGE,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. ALUNGAL MOHAMMED, S/O.HASSANKUTTY, KONDOTTY VILLAGE, CALICUT AIRPORT,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM. SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI FOR R5. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------------ LAA. No. 460 of 2008 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of September, 2009 J U D G M E N T Pius C. Kuriakose, J. This appeal is remaining in the defect list on the reason that service of notice to R1 to R4 is not completed. We have gone through the impugned judgment. We notice that the present enhancement granted under the impugned judgment, which is only 17% over what was granted by the L.A. Officer. We do not find any warrant to interfere with the impugned judgment, since according to us, on the evidence available on record, the correct market value of the property will not be below what is fixed by the reference court under the impugned judgment. The appeal will stand dismissed. No costs. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE ksv/-