IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1236 of 2006 MUNESHWAR PRASAD Versus SMT.HARBANTI DEVI ----------- 3. 10.11.2008 Surendra/ Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the opposite party. After some argument counsel for the petitioner realizing the limitation that has been imposed under the impugned order seeks permission to withdraw this application. He, however, contends that in the given facts his client already stands penalized and therefore, further penalty of Rs. 5000/- followed by Rs. 1500/- should be waived, inasmuch as the amount that the petitioner has spent for the sale deed may also have gone in mess. Mr. Amit Prakash, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party, fairly submits that he does not object to the amount of cost and accordingly, this civil revision application is permitted to be withdrawn with a direction that the payment of cost as directed by it for Rs. 5000/- followed by Rs. 1500/- will not be payable by the petitioner. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)