'^-^. ^ ^,.:3^HC-78 ^ wwn^w^ "5^?';;s?FTR;PT, ^til^Ko, f®i^ll<H^< —.^UZ<:..^J..../V.O.'f3..?-f •"^2007 ^I^T TT?F^ ( ^f^^^ ^n^r ^T 'f^Nr '^STfW^T'^N? 'P<fTW ^rf?^ 3:H^T Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dhirehdra Mishra.J PETITIONERS 1. 2. Smt.! agecj Bhail ^Tprf^r^ 'snwff^ fe^ Ti^^R ^3^R3rH^T Parvati Rao W/o Shri Duryodhan Rao, about 31 yeare, R/o Buniyad Nagar, puri, Raipur, Tah. & Distt. Raipur. CG. Smt.jRita M. Jethani W/o Shri Manohar Jethani, agec| about 38 years, R/o Byside of Hotel Kohihoor. Amardeep Talkies Road, Bans Tall, Raiplur, Tah. & Distt. Raipur, CG Resoondents 3. 4. 5. Versys 1. . t SmtJ aboi|t 42 years, R/o Bhilai Nagar Sector-7, Asha Fade W/o Shri Anant Fade, aged DurgCG. Neelima Fotani W/o Shri Naresh Fotani, about 25 years, Balaghat.Dist. Balaghat, Disttt Smt.1 agec| CG.I MisslNikita Lalchandani D/o Shri Kishan Chand Lalc|iandani, aged about 20 years, R/o Ward No.3|6, New Khursipar, Bhilai, District Durg, CG of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Administratjon and Development lirtment, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, CG. lunidpal CouncU, Bhilai-3. Chroda through ihief Municipal OfRcer, Munidpal Coundl, Bhil4i-3, Chroda, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. Writ petition under Artid* 226 ofthe Constitution of India. 8.5.2009: Mr. MK Baeg, leamed couns|el for the Mr. Alok Bakshi, leamed Heard. petitioners. GAjfor the State/respondent No.1. y^n^f'*-iWV^^?~W':Sf*-^!f''- v:i'*^ :^m. W^T'^T ^v|jcb ??S?T3^T^I ^RTcF ^ ^^f ^i^Kri^, ^ti1<H4i<o, f®i<ni^^< . ^^CCj)^o,^3^^ 'RTO^n'^^PW" '""""""'""""" """""^200^ 3^?T T(^7 (^t^^^) ?^nw^fi?r ^fT^i J- Grievance ofthe petitioner^ isthat they are entitted for alfotment of land as per Vashundhara Nagar (Dak^hin) Aavasiya Avam Sah Vyavasaik Yojana of Annexure P/1. The petitioners jhave already submitted their appliGations for allotment of plots vide Annexure| No.2. hcwever, their applicationsl till date. Learned counsel for the <:^l^?^?<<ilk ^TFf^ff ^ "fe^t T^f^R iiT3?^T^I^T P/7 dated 28.7.2008 before the respondent have not been dec'ided by respondent No.2 Ipetitioners submits that though he is not pressing this petition on merits, h^wever, it may be disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the|r applications for allotment of plots under the aforesaid scheme in accordance ^jvith law within a specified period. After hearing learned couijisel for the petitioners, the instant petition is disposed of with liberty to the j>etitioners to fite a fresh representation for allotment of plots under the afore^aid scheme before respondent No.2 within a period of 15 days from today. Oh such representation being made, the same shall be considered and decided jby respondent No.2 within a further period of ©ightweeks from the date of recjeipt of the representation in accordance with law. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge .?^>».,,..».,^,^·„i<s<i,