1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NMS/109/2010 IN SUIT NO. 104 OF 2010 Hemlekha Atul Mehta ...Plaintiff Vs. Vanita J. Mehta & 5 ors. ...Defendants Ms.Sumedha Rao for the plaintiff. Mr.V.K.Sharma for the defendants. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 10th February, 2010. P.C.- 1 The plaintiff has filed this Suit for partition against defendants 1 to 4 and claiming 1/5th share in the property. There is nothing to show the title and/or ownership of the property by the defendants. The defendants, in reply, have given full details in paragraphs 6, 7 and 8 that the property is basically tenanted property. Whatever the rights, even if any, of the plaintiffs as claimed, is a matter of trial and detail inquiry. At this stage, there is no case made out by the plaintiffs for any ad-interim relief. 2 Notice of motion is accordingly dismissed, with liberty. Status-quo already granted stands vacated, with liberty. No costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)