IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 978 of 2008 Smt. Kamal and others ……….. Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ………. Respondents Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Hoder for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Hoder for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No. 3. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case submitted the chargesheet against the petitioners Smt. Kamla, Yogesh Kumar and Smt. Kavita before the Circle Officer concerned and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit chargesheet before the court concerned in the near further. The learned Brief Holder further submits that petitioners Narander and Surander have not been chargesheet as no prima facie evidence ha been collected against them. This fact has been made in para 2 of the counter affidavit by the State. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 05.12.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 17.04.2009 Shiv