(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 1091 OF 2011 Krushna s/o. Laxman Sawant, Age 51 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Mhaski, Taluka : Vaijapur, District : Aurangabad, and 2 others. .. Petitioners. versus Bhagwansing s/o. Kalyansingh Rajput, Age : - , Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Navjivan Colony, Vaijapur, Taluka : Vaijapur, District : Aurangabad. .. Respondent. ....................... Mr. N.D. Sonavane, Advocate, for the petitioners. ........................ CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 22ND FEBRUARY 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. Heard Adv. Mr. Sonavane, for the petitioners. (2) 2. Apparently, at this stage, effort of the petitioners / plaintiffs appears to be, to secure evidence through court commissioner to point out how alleged alternate route is not convenient. The trial court has rejected the prayer for appointment of court commissioner. I do not see any jurisdictional error or perversity. 3. With liberty to the parties to move again, in case, after recording of evidence any ambiguity is found, present petition is disposed of. No costs. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp1091