IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 10675 of 2008. Decided on 03.03.2011. _____________________________________________________ Krishan Chand. …Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. B.N. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent. : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. B.N. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the basis of instructions imparted to him by his client, submits that the grievance of the petitioner is being redressed by the department itself. Consequently, the present petition is rendered infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge March 03, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.