IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND SIX P R E S E N T THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA * * * WP.No.11154 of 2006 Between: Uggumudi Pulla Reddy, s/o. Subba Redy, Aged about 49 years, President, Village Level Committee, Potipalem Gram Panchayat, Gudur Rural Mandal, Nellore District. … Petitioner Versus The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Gudur Division, Gudur Nellore District & Ors. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri M.Venkatnarayana Counsel for the Respondents: Sri K.Upender Reddy, GP for PR & Rural Development O R D E R : Heard the counsel. The writ petition is filed to declare the inaction of the first respondent in considering the representation of the petitioner dated 03-4-2006 and pass necessary orders thereon in the light of the resolution of the Panchayat dated 28-2-2006 to execute about 22 works in Potipalem village duly attended by the respondents 2 to 5, the Sarpanch, Members of the Panchayat and other officials as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and the provisions of AP Panchayat Raj Act and consequently direct the respondents to issue necessary work orders for executing the works mentioned in the resolution dated 28-2-2006 of the fifth respondent Panchayat and pass such other suitable orders. It is stated that the petitioner made a representation on 03-4-2006 to the first respondent. No doubt, the learned AGP for Panchayat Raj states that the stand taken by the writ petition is totally unsustainable and the writ petition filed is premature. This court is not inclined to go into the said question in-as-much-as it is stated that a representation dated 03-4-2006 is said to be pending with the first respondent. In view of the above, the first respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representation dated 03-4-2006 said to have been filed by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. No costs. June 26th, 2006. ---------------------------- I s L. P . S . NARAYANA , J