WE6H 03URT OF WWKHISeMW AT 8ILASPUR W. P.(S) N0.165S af Z007 Petitioi«r Respondents VerajB Rohinath Singh S/0 shri Pumo Singh cged about 42 yedrs R/0 Basantata Tehsil Kunkuri District Jashpur V.G.] 1. Stote of CWwttisgtrh through the Secretary Tribot Welfare &epcrtment, O.K.S. Siavan, AAantnriayo, Rdpu- (C^.) 2. Secretary Oeportment of Finance, D.K.S. Bhwcn, Mantraldya, Raipur (C.6.) 3. Commissioner, Tribd Welfore &epartment, Jashpur (CA) 4. Assistunt Commisstoner, Tribal Welfore Oeportment, Olstrict Jashpur (C.6.) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sotish K. <<gniho1ri. J Present: AAs. Binu Pathak, Advocate fw the petitioner. M.T; Arvind Dubey, Ponet Lamyer for State/respondents. OR&ER 0>assedonthis21*> Exyof M<a'di,2(»7) 1. The question of !««•involved herem osto tdiether Ihe petitioner is entitled to regular p«yscale w.c.f. the date of mitwl oppointment w frwm thedate of completjon of probaMon pwiod. 2. l.eamed counsel appeu-ing for the petitioner as iwll as for the State/respondents jointly submit •thut the facts ond yiestion of law involved'the present wrrit petition <re Ihe same to •th<it of in W. P. (S) No, 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwqri <md others vs. State 6ovemment of ChhaM'isgarh A others). which NUS altowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. 3. In view of •the obove-stafed submissions made by leamed couisel for the parties, Ihe writ petition is atldwed in the scme terms. No order <w to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge Si^hosh