IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN MONDAY, THE 12TH OCTOBER 2009 / 20TH ASWINA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 744 of 2009(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.26293/2006 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ---------------------------- K.MOIDEEN HAJI, S/O.MOHAMMED HAJI, AGED 68 YEARS, KANNADAN HOUSE, P.O.EDARIKKODE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------ SRI.PAREED, AGED 55 YEARS, SON OF (NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. R. LAKSHMINARAYAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN, J. = = = = = = = = = CONT. CASE (C) 744 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2009. O R D E R This is a contempt application complaining about the noncompliance of the judgment dated 8.1.2007 in W.P.(C) 26293/2006. 2. As per the said judgment, direction was given to the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority to consider Ext.P3 application for revision of timings and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after hearing the parties, expeditiously. As such no time limit is fixed in the judgment for complying with the direction. However, it is contended that the judgment ought to have been complied with atleast within a reasonable time. 3. When the case was taken up for consideration today, both sides submitted that the judgment has been complied with. As such no grievance stands to be redressed in this contempt case. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed. P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE. KNC/-