AB 3519/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UB SAHA The instant application is filed under Section 438 CrPC by the petitioners, name ly, 1. Sri. Sanjeev Das 2. Sri. Joyhari Das, 3. Sri. Indrajit Das, 4. Sri. Ranji t Das Sarkar, 5. Sri. Sanjit Das Sarkar, 6. Sri. Bimal Das Sarkar, 7. Sri. Joykr ishna Das, 8. Sri. Joykashi Das, 9. Sri. Sujit Das, 10. Sri. Pradip Das, 11. Sri Dilip Das and 12. Sri Dipu Das for granting them bail in the event of their arr est in connection with Ramkrishna Nagar Police Station case No. 104/2011 under S ection 147/148/149/448/325/326 IPC. Heard Mr. SC Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioners who submits that there is a case and counter case between the parties. The petitioner Sri Sanjeev Das l odged an FIR which will be evident from Annexure-II and there is also a civil su it between the parties. Mr. BS Sinha, learned Addl. PP for the State while producing the CD though admit ted that there is case and counter case but would contend that the informant par ty sustained more injuries than the petitioners. It appears from the record that petitioner No. 3, Indrajit Das also sustained in juries from the same incident which will be evident from Annexure-III, prescript ion of the Medical Officer, Incharge, Joypur SHC. Therefore, it can be said that both informant and the petitioners were involved in the same incident and both the group sustained injuries from the same incident. Mr. Biswas further submits that all the petitioners are the permanent resident o f village-Santipur under PS Ramkrishnanagar and petitioner No. 12 is a Security Guard working for Hawk DXB at Bangalore and on the date of occurrence he was at Bangalore. Considering the entire facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petition ers above named shall be enlarged on bail in the event of their arrest in connec tion with the aforesaid PS Case on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with o ne surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the IO of the cas e, except the petitioner No. 12, once in a week, till the investigation is compl ete. With the aforesaid order, the instant application is allowed.