IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 3734 of 2011 Date of decision: 25.05.2011 ________________________________________________________________________ Kanta Devi. ...Petitioner. Versus. State of H.P. & others. ...Respondents. Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph,C.J. The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma,J. ________________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petition is filed with the following prayers: “1. Directing the respondents to grant pension and pensionary benefits to the petitioner No. 1 from the due date. 2. Directing the respondents to provide employment to the son of the petitioner, i.e., petitioner No. 2 on compassionate grounds under the policy governing employment assistance to the one member of the family of Home Guards who die in the performance of his duty as Home Guard.” 2. According to the learned Additional Advocate General, there is no policy in the matter. According to the petitioner, the policy in the State is applicable in the cases of Home Guards as well. It is submitted by the petitioner that representation is pending before the second respondent. There will be a direction to the second respondent to look into the representation , Annexure P-10, submitted by the ...2... petitioners and take appropriate action in accordance with law and justice within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of writ petition by the petitioners. 3. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also pending application(s) if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Sharma) Judge 25th May, 2011 (jai/virender)