IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.18564 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : MARCH 23, 2011 DIDAR SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER (COOPERATION) PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Ms. Navdeep, Advocate, for Mr. GS Sandhawalia, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Sonu Chahal, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. AS Khinda, Advocate, for respondent No.4. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 Without doubt and admittedly, respondent No.4- Jagdish Singh is more educated than petitioner-Didar Singh, being 10th class pass, whereas the petitioner is illiterate. The petitioner was involved in an FIR case under Section 302, Indian Penal Code, however, has been acquitted. There were allegations of misappropriation of Panchayat funds against the petitioner. 2 Considering the merits and demerits of the petitioner vis-a-vis respondent No.4, respondent No.4 has been found to be more suitable to be appointed Lambardar for Village Nawan Pind (Gatewala), Tehsil and District Kapurthala. The Financial Commissioner, accordingly, has accepted the appeal of respondent No.4 vide order dated 20.3.2009 (Annexure P-9), Civil Writ Petition No.18564 of 2009 2 while setting aside order dated 14.11.2004 (Annexure P-7), passed by the Commissioner, whereby order dated 27.8.2004 (Annexure P-4), passed by the Collector, was upheld. 3 No ground for judicial review of the impugned order is made out in extra ordinary writ jurisdiction. 4 The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. March 23, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?