IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17362 of 1998 SRI BHAGWAN SINGH SON OF LATE FAUDAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-KHANPUR, P.O. KHANPUR, P.S. DERNI, AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF HEMANTPUR, P.S. DIGHWAR, DISTT-SARAN, CHAPRA …PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. JAI MANGAL SAH, SON OF LATE RAMASHISH SAH 3. MANOJ KUMAR SAH, SON OF JAI MANGAL SAH 4. GOPALJI SINGH 5. KRISHNA BIHARI SINGH BOTH SONS OF LATE MAHAVIR SINGH 6. BASANTI KUAR, WIFE OF LATE RAJ BIHARI SINGH 7. RAJ KUMARI KUAR, WIFE OF LATE MAHAVIR SINGH NO.2 TO 7 RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE HEMANTPUR, PS. DIGHWARA, DISTRICT, SARAN. 8. RAJ KUMAR SINGH (STAMP VENDOR), CHAPRA REGISTRY OFFICE, AT, P.O, P.S, CHAPRA, DISTRICT, SARAN. 9. BRIJ BIHARI TIWARI, SCRIBER (KATIB), CHAPRA REGISTRY OFFICE, RESIDENCE OF GARHAITI, P.O AND P.S, BHAGWAN BAZAR, DISTRICT, SARAN ……….OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 6. 11-Mar-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner preferred a complaint petition alleging that a particular lady had died prior to the date on which the accused persons created a deed of gift in the name of that lady and in favour of some of the accused persons. After considering all the materials, by a long and reasoned order the learned Magistrate dismissed the complaint petition. He was of the view that the dispute is primarily a civil dispute as to which of the documents is 2 proper and valid. 3. Against the order of the learned Magistrate the petitioner went in revision and the revisional court considered the matter in detail but declined to interfere. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the view that interest of justice does not require interference in the matter. Hence, this application is dismissed. 5. It goes without saying that this will not prejudice the case of the petitioner if there be any civil dispute between the parties in relation to the matter in controversy. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)