IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2009 / 13TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 3428 of 2009(G) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.P. RAHMATH, W/O. V.K. SHARAFUDEEN, SHARARA BUNGLOW, KAYYATTH ROAD, THALASSERRY, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.HABEEB RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR. 2. ADDL. TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, THALASSERRY. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, THALASSERRY VILLAGE, THALASSERRY. 4. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THALASSERRY., BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. SUDHA DEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No.3428 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2009. JUDGMENT Exts.P3 and P4 are the notices issued to the petitioner, under the provisions of the Land Conservancy Act. Aggrieved by these notices, petitioner filed an appeal and that was rejected. Against the appellate order petitioner filed Ext.P5 revision, along with Ext.P6 stay petition. Ext.P7 is the receipt acknowledging Exts.P5 and P6. Orders have not been passed either on the revision or on the stay petition. In the meanwhile, petitioner submits that there is threat of demolition of the compound wall, which is the subject matter of the revision. Considering the fact that the revision filed by the petitioner is pending consideration of the first respondent, I direct the first respondent to consider Ext.P5 with notice to the petitioner and pass orders thereon, as expeditiously as WP(c).No.3428/09 /2/ possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. It is directed that until revision is disposed of, further proceedings to implement Exts.P3 or P4 or the appellate order will be kept in abeyance. petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the Ist respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/