IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15642 of 2010 PANKAJ KUMAR, S/o Munni Mahto. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 14.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that now the matter has been compromised between the parties in support of which Annexure-2 has been filed in the present case and the counsel for the informant is also present in Court supporting this fact, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Narahat P.S. Case No. 128 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the 2 petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The parties are directed to make efforts immediately for commitment of the case and the Court in seisin of the same will conclude the case expeditiously in view of the fact that the matter has been compromised between them. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)