IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.689 of 2010 1. RANJEET KUMAR @ RANJEET KUMAR YADAV 2. Ramjeet Kumar @ Ramjeet Kumar Yadav Both are R/o Vill. Jarhara, P.S. Bodh Gaya, Dist. Gaya. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 19.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. This revision application is filed against the Judgment and Order dated 16.03.2010 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 3 of 2010/7 of 2010 by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-2nd , Gaya by which he has confirmed the order dated 18.12.2009 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Magadh Division, Gaya in Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No. 121 of 2008. Petitioners’ prayer was earlier refused by this Court with option to renew the same in case of non-disposal of the case. In the meantime, one of the co-accused, having no assistance under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (care and protection of children) Act, has been allowed bail. Petitioners approached the Apex Court which opined to take into consideration the Juvenile to adult co- accused. Petitioner is in custody since 21.10.2008. Taking all the above discussed circumstances into consideration, petitioners are entitled for bail which has not been considered by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as by the Appellate Court. Accordingly, the revision application is allowed and at the same time, Order and Judgment of the Board and Appellate 2 Court are set aside. Let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Gaya in connection with Both Gaya P.S. Case No. 121 of 2008/ G.R. No. 2173 of 2008/Tr. No. 856(G) of 2009. One of the bailers shall be the close relative of the petitioners with proof of residence, who would undertake to keep the petitioners under his observation and produce whenever is required by the Juvenile Justice Board or Court. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)