.{1}. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICTION NO.200 OF 2008 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (STAMP) NO.29890 OF 2007 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2138 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5347 OF 2006 Shri Lahu Shankar Patil. ..Applicant. Versus Sea Carriers Shipping Pvt. Ltd. and another. ..Respondents. ... Mr.S.C.Naidu, Advocate i/b. M/s. C.R.Naidu & Co. for the applicant. Mr.S.N.Mitra, Advocate i/b. M/s. Dunmor Sett, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.S.K.Chinchalikar, A.G.P., for respondent No.2. ... CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2009. DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2009. DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard. The learned Counsel for the respondent states that he has no objection to the delay being condoned. 2. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the application delay is condoned. 3. Put up the matter for admission in due course. 4. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. [J.N.PATEL,J.] [J.N.PATEL,J.] [J.N.PATEL,J.] .{2}. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]