:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.18 OF 200 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.18 OF 200 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.18 OF 2008 Kusum Nitesh Jain & Anr. ....Applicants. v. Shalan M. Kanhere & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.P.S.Dani i/by Kiran Jain & Co. , adv. for the Applicants. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 24th January, 2008. DATE: 24th January, 2008. DATE: 24th January, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The learned counsel for the applicant seeks to withdraw this application on the ground that in view of the amendment in Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, revision application is not tenable and seeks liberty to file writ petition. 2. Revision Application stands disposed off as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty if permissible under the law. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)