1 S.B.Cr.Misc. IIIrd Bail App. No.1377/2008 (Rajendra alias Raju Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : March 27, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Dr.S.S.Jodha, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor. This is third bail application. After rejecting the earlier bail applications, the prosecutrix has been examined as PW.4. She has not supported the prosecution case and turned hostile. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Carefully gone through the statement of the prosecutrix PW.4 aged 21 years. She in her statement has stated that petitioner Rajendra alias Raju and Ramswaroop have not committed anything with her. However, co-accused Ramswaroop has been granted bail by this Court vide order dt.25.3.2008. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that similarly situated co-accused Ramswaroop has been granted bail, taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. 2 Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Rajendra alias Raju s/o Prabhu Ram be released on bail in FIR No.100/2007, P.S. Deedwana, Distt. Nagaur provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-