1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1288 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1288 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1288 OF 2005 Rajashri Rajesh Shinde & Others. ..Applicants. V/s. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. ----- Shri P.R. Arjunwadkar, for the Applicants. Shri K. V. Saste, APP for the Respondent- State. ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : MARCH 02, 2005 DATED : MARCH 02, 2005 DATED : MARCH 02, 2005 PC :- PC :- PC :- . Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the record. 2. As the case is based on the circumstantial evidence and as investigation is complete and the chargesheet is also filed coupled with the fact that there are no antecedents and the applicants being female, the applicants deserve to be enlarged on bail by imposing conditions as follows:- (a) The Applicants are enlarged on bail in connection with C.R.No. I-336/2004, registered with Mira Road Police Station, on executing personal bond 2 in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand only) each with one or two local sureties in the like amount. (b) The Applicants shall co-operation for early disposal of the trial. If the trial court is of the opinion that the applicants are responsible for delay in trial that fact be recorded in the Rozanama, which can be a ground for cancellation of bail. (c) The applicants shall not influence the prosecution witness or tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner whatsoever. 3. Ordered accordingly. .....