anéa imW awn 311%?1Was mm 111%?! ma mamqm#wm $Wanéer “WC§)é£/J3L/o....;.... m WIW 2005 ma m (W) C/ Petitioners 1. Versus Respondents 1. Mohan Lal Patel, Age about 56 years, Astt. Tcachcr, S/o Shn' Abhimanyu Patel Govt. Prinarv School Bijarabhata Block—Basna Dist Mahasamund (CG) Mohan Lal Fatal Age about 54 Véaxs UDT S/o Late Shn Govmd Ram Patel Govt M1ddle School Khosla Block Basna, Distt. Mahxasamund (CG) Kisl] ore Kumar Pradharl Age about 59 years, Astt Teacher S/o Shrl Panuram Pradhan, Gov1. Primary School, Dumm'pali, Block Basna, Distt. Mahaaamund (CG) Bhesh Kumar Nayak, Age about 59 year, Astt. Teacher, S/o Late 5111i Ravi Shankar Nayak Govt Primary School ChilTaleva Block Basna, ':. Mahasamund (CG) Shyzunsundra Sahu, Age about 59 year, aster S/o Shri Panurmn Pradhan, Middle School, Khoksa Block Basna, rv School Bljqrabhata Block Basna Mahasamund (Lb) Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through the Commissioner Tribal Welfare Mahasamund, , Distt. 3w \ WW,W;W @ J m . m a 311w m,(1af§aa) rm Writ getition under Article 22E of the Constitution of India 8.3. Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra M 19.11.2008 counsel for the netitioners. Shri Somkant Vanna. Shri YS Thakur, DV A State. By this petition, thé p respondents to consider thE School Education Departl'x (Annexure P/ 2) and order da Learned counsel for “L13 similarly situated teacher 11a considered by the State ib Annexure P/ 2. He further sx at this stage, however, he pr. detailed representation for respondent No.1, who ma representation within a sped Shri YS Thakur, leal learned PL appearing for the ishra, J 3r with Snshree Sunita Jain, P.L. for the etitioners are praying for direction to the ix case for absorption of services in the ent as per Circular dated 13.1.1995 ;es 15.2003 (Annexure Pf 3) e petitionels submits that sewices of the nely Om Prakash Kosle have aheady been L‘ absoyption in the light of Circular of Lbnlits that he is not pressing this petition iys for liberty to the petitioners to make a redressal of their grievances before the y be fruther directed to decide their lied period. lied Dy AG with Sushree Sunita Jain, State submit that in ease the petitioners i5 \ 1mm aint'a; .axHCs)..6.2v3.%/Q£...;... m 20% 31mm?! E3115 aan menmfas mmW 311%?1 a? mmW #‘WW <‘5 31% 311%91 Mallasamund. 5. Disti V. Ed ucation Officm; Mahasanmnd, Distt. Mah asajrmnd. mmm‘as- $ Liggr ..w.42¢rn)..g2;g.?c./Log M2005 mat cam (WE) mama!W E1211 anéeumim mmm 311w 3 mmx¥%@m- aiWanéal i116 a fresh representm‘iou bi their grievances, the sama $1 r of Circular of Amlexure P/ 2 six weeks from the date of re In View of above subu' the instant petition is disp< make ’a detailed renresem redressal of their grievances. the same on its own men't: Circular of Annexure P/ 2, wj \ fore the responiient No. 1 for redressal of Lall be considel'eel and (iecided in the light in accordance wifh law within a pe-Iiocl of :eipt of the representation. issions of leained counsel for the parties, )sed of with liberty to The petitioners to ition before the respondent No. 1 for Who, in turn, shall consider and decide ‘. in accordance with law. in the light of thin a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of The Iepresentation. 1 Sd/— Dhirendra Mishra Judge