IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.11988 of 2008. Decided on: 29.12.2010. Uday Ram. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Another. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. P.C.Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P.Singh, Assistant Advocate General Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Petitioner has already made a representation to the Secretary (Finance) vide Annexure A-4, dated 22nd January, 2005. The same has not been decided till date. 2. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the Secretary (Finance) to decide representation Annexure A-4 by passing a speaking order within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 29, 2010. (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.