THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Petition No.5547 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners/A1 to A3 apprehend arrested in Crime No.176 of 2009 of Munagala Police Station, Nalgonda District, registered for the offence under Sections 353 and 509 IPC. 2. The accusation made against the petitioners is that they entered into the office of the Tahsildar, Munagala and assaulted the de facto complainant in the presence of the staff on 01.07.2009. She went on leave on 02.07.2009. On the next day, she presented a report before the Station House Officer, Munagala Police Station, which formed the basis for registered a case in Crime No.176 of 2009. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent/State. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocents and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that indeed the de facto complainant demanded the money and while the de facto complainant receiving the money, some Press Reporters came and thereupon the de facto complainant changed her version and foisted this case against the petitioners. 5. Learned Additional Public Prosecution appearing for the respondent/State opposed the application. 6. As seen from the records, the Police after registering the crime examined the de facto complainant and two of her colleagues and they have stated of the petitioners entering into the office of the Tahsildar, Munagala and manhandling the de facto complainant. In view of the specific accusation being made against the petitioners, they are not entitled to anticipatory bail. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. (B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J.) Date:04th August, 2009. cs