1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 77. CA/4615/2009 In FAST/6844/2009 (The State Vs. Yashwant) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. V.D.Rakh, A.G.P., for the applicant. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:15/1/2010 P.C.:- 1. The State feels aggrieved by the award and application is moved for condonation of delay of 3565 days in causing to file the appeal. The award is dt.23.2.1999. The resolution dt.19.1.2002 from the Law and Judiciary Department to prosecute the matter was received on 21.1.2002, however, no steps were taken. The appeal should have been filed within stipulated date but the slumber and the remissness is demonstrated. 2 2. Incidentally, with the assistance of the learned Counsel, I have gone through the award under challenge of the Reference Court. The Reference Court considered the nature of agricultural property to be Bagayat ( irrigated) and enhanced the compensation by Rs.25,408/-, for the land 84 R. I do not, incidentally, see any illegality in considering the situation as the learned Judge had already decided LAR No.340/1992. Application and appeal rejected. Necessary Court fee be refunded. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/4615-09ca