1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27367 of 2011 1. Bharat Yadav S/o Late Rajdeo Yadav 2. Laddu Yadav S/o Bharat Yadav 3. Rajesh Yadav alias Tengare Yadav S/o Late Lam Mohar Yadav. 4. Mukti Yadav S/o Tuntun Yadav. All R/o Babu Bazar, P.S. Ara Nagar, District- Bhojpur. 5. Shashi Yadav @ Shashi Kumar, S/o Lakhan Yadav, R/o Maulabagh, P.S. Ara Nawada, District- Bhojpur --Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar --Opp.Party For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajani Ranjan Pd. Singh For the State : Mr. Damodar Pd. Tiwary, APP 4 05.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Out of the five petitioners, the application on behalf of petitioner no.2, Laddu Yadav, stood disposed of by order dated 23.11.2011 as having become infructuous. Petitioners are named accused in this case relating to land dispute. Submission is that they carry general and omnibus allegation having no criminal antecedent. Petitioner no.1, Bharat Yadav, appears the order giver but none of the 2 petitioners carry any criminal antecedent In the facts and circumstances, the petitioners no.1, 3, 4 and 5, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in Ara Nawada P.S. Case no. 275 of 2011, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that petitioners shall remain present before the court below for three years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. In case of failure to remain present on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. AAhmad ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)