C.R. No.4611 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.4611 of 2009 Date of Decision: 11.10.2010 Charan Singh ....…Petitioner Versus Gurmeet Singh ……Respondent Coram:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. L. N. MITTAL, J (ORAL) On the preceding date of hearing, following order was passed:- “ Learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to interim order dated 25.09.2009 passed by this Court, proceedings are fixed for today in the executing Court to identify and determine the area of 14 marlas of which possession is to be delivered to decree-holder- respondent. Accordingly, adjournment is prayed so that the said determination is made by the executing Court. However, learned council for the petitioner states that the petitioner has no objection to delivery of possession of 14 marlas area to respondent-decree holder by the executing Court after the said area is identified and determined pursuant to interim order dated 25.09.2009 of this Court. Accordingly, interim order dated 25.09.2009 of this Court is modified to the extent that the executing Court after identifying and determining area as aforesaid shall be at liberty to deliver possession thereof to decree- holder-respondent, in accordance with law.” C.R. No.4611 of 2009 -2- Learned counsel for the parties state that the instant revision petition be disposed of in terms of the said order and the executing Court may proceed accordingly. It is ordered accordingly. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( L. N. MITTAL ) JUDGE 11.10.2010. A. Kaundal