THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3390 of 2009 06.8.2009 Between: Gorriparthi Hari Babu, S/o.Venkateshwara Rao … Petitioner and Buggala Rama Krishna, S/o.Nagaiah And others … Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3390 of 2009 ORDER: First respondent herein instituted O.S.No.807 of 2007 on the file of the Court of I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Eluru. The suit is filed for declaration and permanent injunction. He also filed I.A.No.2243 of 2007 for ad interim injunction. Petitioner herein, who is fourth defendant, opposed application. The trial Judge by order dated 04.8.2008 allowed the application and granted temporary injunction in favour of plaintiff. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner herein along with defendants 1 to 3 preferred CMA No.56 of 2008, which was dismissed by the Court of District Judge, Eluru, on 25.2.2009. Feeling aggrieved thereby, present civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India. Learned Counsel for petitioner/fourth defendant submits that both the Courts below granted ad interim injunction in favour of first respondent/plaintiff based on Xerox copies of documents, and therefore, impugned order is unsustainable. This Court has perused order passed by trial Court as well as appellate Court. No such plea was taken before trial Court or appellate Court. Indeed, trial Court decided the matter based on the documents and affidavit and no party let in evidence. When the documents produced by first respondent/plaintiff were marked as Exs.P1 and P2, no objection was taken. At the stage of revision, defendant cannot be allowed to take such a plea especially when this Court does not find any grave error apparent on the face of record. The civil revision petition is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO,J) August 06, 2009 YS