IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 18TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29794 of 2011(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. VYSAKH SREEKUMAR, S/O SREEKUMAR, VYSAKHAM HOUSE, KURICHIKODE, KODANAD P.O., PERUMBAVOOR 683544 2. NIZAM AHMAD SALIM, S/O SALIM, CHIRAKKAKUDY, KANDANTHARA, ALLAPRA P.O., PERUMBAVOOR BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KURIAN SRI.MATHEW B. KURIAN SRI.K.T.THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM 686560 REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM 686560 SC SRI.T.A.SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 29794 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 20.10.11 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT DATED 20.10.11 EVIDENCING REMITTANCE OF FEE FOR REVALUATION EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 12.10.11 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER EXT.P4- TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 12.10.11 EVIDENCING REMITTANCE OF FEE FOR REVALUATION /true copy/ sd/- P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).29794/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 9th day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of the answer sheets in the final semester B.Tech Degree supplementary Examination, held in March, 2011 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs