BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. TAMILVANAN CRL OP(MD) No.14461 of 2011 1 P. JEYAKODI 2 PANCHAVARNAM 3 SANTHOSH @ SANTHOSHKUMAR ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 TO 4 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE USILAMPATTI TALUK POLICE STATION USILAMPATTI, MADURAI DISTRICT CR NO. 221/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.HAJA MOHIDEEN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDI, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 2.The petitioners / A2 to A4, who are facing charges under Sections 366(A) of IPC in Crime No.221 of 2011 on the file of the respondent, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police and seek anticipatory bail. 3.According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the alleged victim girl had eloped with co-accused A1 and the petitioners are nothing to do with the alleged offence and subsequently, the alleged victim girl was secured by the Police and now she is with her mother. The 1st petitioner is the father and the 2nd petitioner is the mother and the 3rd petitioner is the brother of A1, merely, because they are the family members of A1, the case has been foisted against them. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the 1st petitioner had filed H.C.P.No.953 of 2011 to secure his son A1. However, subsequently, the same was dismissed as not pressed. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent has not disputed the fact that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I find it just and reasonable to grant anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the concerned court and the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 1 and 3 shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners 1 and 3 shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. The 2nd petitioner being a woman shall appear before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation. 6.The petitioners 1 and 3 shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed. Sd/- 08/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE USILAMPATTI 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE USILAMPATTI TK POLICE STATION USILAMPATTI, MADURAI DT 3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. A.HAJA MOHIDEEN Advocate SR.No.38382 ssk/10.11.2011 /5c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14461 of 2011 Date :08/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/