Petitioner Resgondents 1) W Writ Petition No. 4415 of 2004 Chhote‘a! Ganvire aged about 54 years son of Shri Sadaram Mahar, Resident of Kaigaan, Tahsii Antagarh, District Kanker, Chha‘ttisgarh, Empioyed as Vanpal at Tadoki (Aantagam Parikshetra‘; in. East Bhampratappur ‘v‘anmandaL Bhanupratappur. Versus The State 0f Chhattisgarhd, through Pramukh Sachiv Van; Mantraiaya, GE. Read, Raipur (CG), Van Mandaladhikari! East Bhanupratappur Vanmandag Bhanupratappur, Kanker (CG). Apar Pradhan Mukhya‘ Van Sanrakshak {PrashashanIArajpatrm }ail mad, Raipur {CG}. (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of india) SB: Hon’bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Smt. Renu Koohar, counsel for the petitioner. shri Arvind Dubey: Pane! Lawyer for the State. 2) Raju Present: ORAL ORDER Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has fried angina! appiicatien before the State Administrative Tribunat, Raipur, and the same was numbered as Originai Appiciatien No. 347/2002, seeking the same reiiet as sought for in this petition. 2) it is well settled that two petitions are not maintainabie seeking the same reiief arising from the same cause of action. Thus; this petition is net maintainabie‘ 3) The petitioner is at tiberty to pursue Originai Appiication No.347/2002 which must have been‘transferred to this Court pursuant to abolition of the State Administrative Tribunal. 4) This petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. HIGH COURT OF CHHATT!$GARH: BELASPUR ’ {Passed on. 16‘“ Januatys 2008) '