IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.53 of 2008 1. Subhash Chandra Singh, son of late Ram Rattan Singh, Trained Science Teacher, Madhya Vidyalaya, Maharajganj, Malia Mahadeo, Patna. 2. Shri Babua Nand Singh, son of late Dwarika Singh, Trained Science Teacher, Madhya Vidyalaya, Kali Sthan, Patna City, Patna. 3. Shri Birendra Kumar, son of late Shatrughan Sinha, Trained Science Teacher, Madhya Vidyalaya Nakhas Pind, Chauk Patna City, Patna. 4. Shri Om Prakash Singh, son of Shri Ram Dhyan Singh, Trained Science Teacher, Madhya Vidyalaya, Chaughara Chauk, Patna City, Patna. 5. Shri Adyanand Pd. Verma, son of Shri Ram Deo Prasad Verma, Trained Science Teacher, Adhunik Shishu Madhya Vidyalaya, Khagaul, Patna. 6. Shri Baiju Prasad, son of Shri Ram Dayal Sao, Trained Science Teacher, Madhya Vidyalaya, Kurkuri, Paliganj, Patna. 7. Shri Suresh Prasad, son of Shri Gurucharan Singh, Trained Science Teacher, Urdu Madhya Vidyalaya, Gulzarbagh, Patna. 8. Shri Ram Pravesh Singh, son of late Jaddu Singh, Trained Science Teacher, Madhya Vidyalaya Chaudhary Tola, Mahendrru, Patna. 9. Shri Girdhari Sharma, son of late Ram Jatan Sharma, Trained Science Teacher, Madhya Vidyalaya Dariapur, Patna ---- Petitioners. Versus 1. Shri Anjani Kumar Singh, Education Commissioner, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. Shri Ashok Kumar, the Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna. 3. Shri B. Rajendra, the Chairman of the District Education Establishment Committee and the District Magistrate, Collectorate, Patna. 4. Shri Ram Sagar Prasad Singh, the District Superintendent of Education, Patna . 5. The State of Bihar through Anjani Kumar Singh Education Commissioner. 6. R.D.D.E., Patna. ------------- 2 8. 5.5.2011 Heard Mr. Ram Padarath Singh for the petitioners, and Mr. Bipin Kumar, learned Assistant Counsel to Standing Counsel No.24, for the opposite parties. The petitioner of C.W. J.C. No. 2038 of 2000, has preferred this application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Court’s Act, read with article 215 of the Constitution of India, for the alleged non-implementation of the order dated 12.7.2007, whereby the writ petition was disposed of with the direction to respondent no.4 thereto to take a final decision in the matter within a period of four months. We are informed at the Bar that the final order has already been passed and the petitioner has challenged the same by preferring C.W.J.C. No. 4866 of 2011. Disposal of the representation renders this contempt application infructuous. It is accordingly disposed of. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar ,J. )