1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.277 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.1577 OF 1988 Maganlal Harilal Doshi & Ors. )..Plaintiffs Vs. Sarvadaman Mansukhlal Doshi & Ors. )..Defendants ---- Mr. Percy Mody i/by Fedral & Rashmikant for the plaintiffs. Mr. Niraj Dave i/by B. Munim & Co. for the defendant nos.1A to 1D,2 to 23 & 39. ---- Coram : R.S.MOHITE,J Date : 8th June, 2010 PC 1 This is a Chamber summons taken out by the original plaintiff for deleting the name of defendant no.30 Hasmukhlal Doshi. It is seen that the deceased person is also made as defendant no.38 in his capacity as a karta of HUF. For that reason, prayer clause-(b) is also made to delete the name of defendant no.38 and to substitute the name of his son Prakash Doshi. Amendment is also sought in the title by adding defendant nos.31 to 34 in their personal capacity as well as their heirs and legal representatives of the deceased. Advocate for the defendants has no objection for granting the amendment subject to any contention which he may raise in his additional written statement if he thinks necessary. Chamber summons is therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clauses-(a), (b) and (c). Amendment will be subject to the rights of the defendants to raise any contention if they chose to file an additional written statement. It is seen that the papers in the original suit are torn. Advocate for the plaintiff is directed to re-construct the torn pages. (R.S.MOHITE,J) 2 3