WWSWW^SS^i^S IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR: C.G. M.A.No.^T-Of2005 / WVlSiOn MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION ^73, '- MOTORVEHICLESACT, 1988 :ani :uiti AppeIIant: Non applicant no.3 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Through Branch Manager, Rajnandgaon Branch, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus Respondents: 1) Ramratan S/o Bishesar Dhobi, aged about 40 •"' ^years,0ccupation Driver, R/o village Lodhi Kampa, Thana Khamaria, District Durg, Hal Mukam village Saja Thana & Tahsil Saja,District ^ Durg (C.G.) n •^\;.y^. &; .V -; ~^ 's". / ^ ^^ ^ 'fN? t? /-^ 5 ; ^; s 1 s i J ^J^ 2.); Bhagwandas S/o Narayandas Maheshwari, ^ ^aged about 42 years, R/o village Saja,Tahsil & Thana Saja, District Durg (C.G.) Non-pplicants 1 & 2 ^ Rohit S/o Roopchand Satnami, iged about 19 years, ^4) Suraj S/o Roopchand, aged about 17 years, 5) Surjabai D/o Roopchand aged 15years, •' ^ 6) (^Parshottam S/o Roopchand, aged 12 years, ^Jankibai D/o Roopchand, aged 8 years '8)'/,Ku.Laxmi D/o Roopchand, aged 5 years, All Minors through Guardian Wali Father Roopchand S/o Kaladas Satiiami, aged about 37 years. 9).-Roopchand S/o Kaladas Satnami, aged 37 years, /^/ ~ All R/o village Janta, Thana & Tahsil Saja, District Durg (C.G.)_CIaimants z^ XI-HC-78 sn^rqirf^rH; cPtT3n^?Tsftli°b <41*1<^1 Sb*lich 3ST •<ll<ll(rl<<, aiTll.u'ls, Rjc<iy^< ^-^.h.A-m:.^'^. ^J^ . . .4 .V. 1-K . . .-. ...... .. ^. 200^ 3n^?r 'ra'ap (4=ii^sii^sr) s^cffw^fscTsn^T 02/02/2007 Shri Sanjay S. Agrawai, Shri Hemanth ©upts,coi\ Ms. Pushpo &wived!,coui^ Heard. Tne oniv arcund on wMi impugned by the isarned coi^ eyicence ied by the ciaimsnlls Qccident the trsctor trolley wj i.s. in breach ofthe poiiw of tiji I hava perused tha evid^ No. 1 a."d 2 as also by the cppj shows thct the accsdsrit did n4 transoortina bricks but had trcnsported when ths tract4 !'etu"nin9 w-'hile carryin9 the a^ the sois ssitness for the rsspi^ the orfendlng tractor in para ^ Jugr'i Bsi who isas trsvelling i emp'oysd for agricuitur'a! pui^' ihc;9»'an 5as i.e. respondent Gppeilarit/'insursr to establish <tii<ifci41-< t)i>itiTft'te^l'<|Si+<;i< ^iStf^irgn^r ^ounse! for the appeiiant. Insel for the resoondents No. 1 snd 2. se! for respondents No. 3 to 9. ich the cward datad 28.01.2005 is nse! for the appellcnt is thot the establishss that at the time of 33 being used for transporting bricks !£insu''snc£. nce Ise by ths ciaimants/respor.den+s sllant/non-applicant No. 3. It clearly it occur whsmhe trcctor trollev wcs sccurred aftar £!r,ptyir!g the bricks ir trol!ey was, cfter fi!!in9 diessl, gricultursl iabour. The testimony of indents i.e. Rcm Rstan, the driver of aiso Qoes to shouf thct ~he deceased i the trsctor troiiey was c labourer !pose by the owner of the tr'oc?or *&. 2. No evidence wcs led by ths 'hat at ths time of ths accidsnt, ths .„_i.-u^riiAl XI-HC-78 ^ST'^PTRra', »Tfl.^'16, Rlcll+iy Hni^r a>fli<f» ^ 200 Sli^l 4a<*> (yif^ci^ff) aiT^T^rf^iN; aqT3:nw»i*<i'* STOTW (rf^tT sn^T +l-i<Ffl'ifl-< IITqcff fr' fgcS <KtW{ ^srf^Tsn^T Pi'JVG </ tractor troiiey was being u^ insursnce. In this visw of the ra^ iisbility on the insurer to pay ^ The appeal being devoid no or'der as to costs. ied in breach of the policy of the rtter, the impugnad casard fastening ;ompensation is impeccabie. of nserit is disrr.issed. Tnsre shcil be Sd/- DiUp Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge