IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1276 of 2010 SATYA NARAIN YADAV @ SATYA NARAYAN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 4/ 13.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is alleged for committing rape upon the complainant followed by snatching of ornaments. This allegation is leveled by filing complaint petition on 18.10.2009. One of the dates of occurrence is shown 15.03.2002. Cognizance is taken under Section 379 of the I.P.C. and other allied sections of the I.P.C. but not under Section 376 of the I.P.C. which is doubted on the ground that on 02.04.2002 this complainant filed a case against her husband for the offence under Section 498A of the I.P.C. and other allied sections of the I.P.C. in which she has leveled allegation against her husband about taking away of some ornaments as shown snatched by this petitioner. Petitioner has been shown a witness which was later on compromised. Character of this lady appears beyond approach of this Court. In name of lady no one can be given liberty to go to any extent to level any allegation against anyone including her husband but circumstances discussed do not justify refusal of anticipatory bail. What action can be taken against the complainant is left to be decided by the Trial Court. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in 2 connection with Complaint Case No. 485C of 2002 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M., Supaul subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)