IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19515 of 2008 1. SATISH KUMAR GUPT 2. BRAJ MOHAN PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 07.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the complainant. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a complaint case under Sections 406, 420 and other provisions of the Penal Code. The submission is that the allegations themselves are of sale on credit when only part payment has been made which makes a civil dispute. Prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected in the year 2006 when it has been renewed before the court below itself in 2007 to justify the present application before this Court in 2008. The conduct of the petitioners disentitles them to anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merits without being prejudiced by the present order. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)