IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 27220 of 2008 Between: Shaik Rahamathunisa W/o.late Shaik Gafoor Sab R/o.Budidetivandlapalli, Peddinenikalva Village, T.Sundupalli Mandal, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintending Engineer, Panchayat Raj Department, Kadapa District, Kadapa. 2 The Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj Department, Kadapa. 3 Deputy Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj Department, Rayachoti, Kadapa District. 4 Asst. Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj Department, T.Sundupalli Mandal, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any Writ, order or directions more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and declare the action of the Respondents herein in laying the road through the petitioner's land in Survey No.495/1, situated in Budidetivandlapalli H/o. Peddinenikalva Village, T. Sundupalli Mandal, Kadapa District without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of the principles of natural justice under Article 300(A) of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to lay road through the Petitioner's land and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner questioning the action of the respondents in laying a road in her land situated in S.No.495/1 of Budidetivandlapalli, hamlet of Peddinenikalva Village, T.Sundupalli Mandal, Kadapa District without following due process of law. This Court on 12.12.2008 while issuing notice, directed the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the land in question without following due process of law. In response to the notice issued by this Court, the respondents have filed a counter affidavit along with vacate stay petition inter alia stating that the laying of road work is taken up only on the existing road and not in the lands of the petitioner and that there is no horizontal expansion of the road and that the road passes adjacent to the land of the petitioner and not into the land of the petitioner. In view of the above statement made in the counter affidavit no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petition and it is accordingly dismissed. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.3.6.2009 msv