THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.1341 and 1342 of 2007 COMMON ORDER: Heard both sides. Since these two Revisions are between the same parties, they are taken up together for disposal. Civil Revision Petition No.1341 of 2007 is directed against the order, dated 14.09.2006, passed by the District Judge, West Godavari at Eluru, dismissing the appeal in A.T.A.No.9 of 2006 and thereby, confirming the order, dated 25.01.2006, passed by the Special Officer (Tenancy)-cum-Junior Civil Judge, Tanuku, in A.T.C.No.29 of 2001. Civil Revision Petition No.1342 of 2007 is directed against the order, dated 14.09.2006, passed by the District Judge, West Godavari at Eluru, dismissing the appeal in A.T.A.No.8 of 2006 and thereby, confirming the order, dated 25.01.2006, passed by the Special Officer (Tenancy)-cum-Junior Civil Judge, Tanuku, in A.T.C.No.23 of 2001. The petitioner in these two Revisions, who is the tenant, invoking Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeks to assail the proceedings, which have been initiated against him by the respondent-landlord, one is in respect of fixation of fair rent with regard to the leasehold rights of the agricultural land, whereas the other proceedings is seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of default committed by him. Enquiry was held in both the proceedings by the Primary authority, wherein both the parties have let in their evidence and ultimately, on appreciation thereof, the Primary authority fixed the rent at 20 bags 30 kgs of paddy per annum for the petition schedule land and while doing so, reliance was placed on Ex.A-1-which is the certified copy of DCB Register for the years 1999-2000 to 2005-2006 and further, with regard to the default committed by the petitioner, the case of the respondent as set forth, and supported by the evidence let in, has been accepted. The appeals preferred by the petitioner against the orders passed in these two proceedings did not yield any result. Hence, the present Revision Petitions. Having heard learned counsel on either side and on a perusal of the material on record, it is quite apparent that in both these proceedings at both the levels, the entire findings that have been arrived at, one in respect of the quantum of fixation of fair rent and other in respect of the commission of default by the petitioner are purely findings of fact, based on appreciation of the evidence and material on record, and therefore, it is not open for this Court to come to a different conclusion than the one arrived at by the Courts below nor any attempt can be made to re-appreciate the whole thing in exercise of the powers conferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, I do not find any irregularity or illegality in the impugned orders warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO 1st July 2010 dr