IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 8031 of 1987 Date of decision: 4.2.2011 Sudarshan Lal Datta …..petitioner vs. Chief Settlement Commissioner and ors ……respondents CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. Vineet Soni, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. B. R. Mahajan, Advocate for respondents. HEMANT GUPTA, J Mr. Mahajan states that he has been informed that parties have entered into a settlement. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no instructions to either accept or controvert the said statement. In view of the said fact, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to seek revival of the petition, if the parties have not entered into settlement. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 4.2.2011 preeti