IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5882 of 2011 CHHOTE LAL YADAV, SON OF LATE GOMADI YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TETARIYA, POLICE STATION BOUNSI, DISTRICT BANKA. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BANKA. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BANKA. 4. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, BOUNSI, DISTRICT BANKA. 5. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE OF BOUNSI POLICE STATION, POLICE STATION BOUNSI, DISTRICT BANKA. 6. THE TREASURY OFFICER, BANKA. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 4.4.2011. Heard Shri Balram Kapri, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Prabhat Kumar, learned A.C. to G.A.2, who appears on behalf of all the respondents i.e. respondent nos.1 to 6. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 31.12.2009 as Chaukidar from Bounsi Police Station, Bounsi Block, District Banka, has prayed for directing the respondents to clear all his retiral dues. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that before retirement, the Circle Officer, Bounsi had asked the petitioner to furnish the papers relating to pension and thereafter, all the documents were submitted by him. However, till date, nothing has been paid to the petitioner nor pension has been fixed. It has further been 2 submitted that the petitioner has filed representation before the District Magistrate/respondent no.2. However, till date, neither any decision has been taken on his representation nor retiral dues have been cleared. With the consent of parties, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2/District Magistrate within a period of two months from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.2 is directed to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If the respondent no.2 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is directed to pass appropriate order for clearing all the admitted retiral dues of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. In case of refusal, respondent no.2 is directed to pass a speaking order within 3 aforesaid time. It goes without saying that petitioner shall be entitled to get admissible statutory interest on delayed payment. With aforesaid observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)