56$) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION NO. iag 4’ / 2006 mi wiiit’g E PETITIONER: / Indrajit Jatav, S/o Late Shri Gangaram Jatav , aged about 27 years, R/o 127 " Son Ganga Sadan Prem Nagar, Morena , Post Jourakhurd , District Morena (M.P.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Agriculture Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur ,(C.G.) d, v 2. The Director, Agriculture Department, Raipur ,(C.G.) 3. The Collector Ramanuj ganj , District Sarguja C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUENCE OF WRIT IN m THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS PROHIBTION M CERTIORARI AND ANY OTHER WRITS DIRECTIONS OR ORDERS. z " 3 ” ( V HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M Wn‘t Petition No. 1484 of 201m Petitioner Indmjit Jatav Vemus Respondents . Single Bench : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. mihotri. Shri J. K. Gupta, Advocate for the peh‘tioner. State of Chhattisgarh 8n others Shn‘ G. K. Ben‘wal, Deputy Advocate General for respondents. ORAL ORDER (28th March, 2006) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that father of the petitioner Shri Gangamm Jatav died in hanness on 20. 12. 1998 while workingas Agriculture Development O$cer (Soil Conservation) at Ramanujganj, District— Surguja. Vide orderexiated 25.2.2005 (Annexum P/ 1) and 5.2.2005 (Annexure P/2) the petitioner has been informed that his Chhattisgarh i.e. l. 1 1.2000, thErefore his case cannot be consideied ‘ for compassionate appointment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits this peh'tion may be disposed of in terms of the order dated 22.12.2005 passed by this Court in W.P.No. 1271/2005 (Sanjay Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) wherein this Court passed the order as A under :- “In View of the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, 1'11 the opinion of this Court, ends ofjustice will be served if a direction is given‘to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities concerned to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in accordance with the policy prevalent at the time of @ deafh of the employee concerned. If the patitioner found eligible, appointment oxrlers will be issued as early as possible on or before 30th April, 2006. The pctitionar is also~dimcted to render due co- oparation to the authon‘ties. It is made clear that if any grievance sfiil xemains the petitioner may avail the remedy available under the law including tiling 0f the petition before this Court.” In View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of finally in terms ofthe order dated 22ml December, 2005 passed by this Court in W.P.No. 1271/ 2005. No order as to costs, Certified copy, as per Rules. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge