IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13944 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 09, 2010. Mansahia Travels Regd. Mansa .....Petitioner versus The State Transport Commissioner .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sushil Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is a Transport Company who has been granted route permit to ply its buses on the route from Mansa-Barnala via Ralla- Joga-Aklia-Pakho Kalan-Rooreke-Handiaya and return from Barnala to Mansa. The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct respondent No.2 to finalize and approve the time table in respect of the above-mentioned route so as to enable the petitioner and various others to ply their respective buses according to the approved time table. It is alleged that despite various representations given by the petitioner, followed by a legal notice dated 5.4.2010 (Annexure P-4), the time-table has not been finalized so far. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and C.W.P.No .13944 of 2010 2 considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to respondent No.2 to dispose of the petitioner's claim, as contained in the aforesaid legal notice dated 5.4.2010 (Annexure P-4) and finalize the regular table as early as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 09, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE