IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 2ND JANUARY 2009 / 12TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 36053 of 2008(P) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------- T.N.DEEPA, W/O.SHRI.T.RADHAKRISHNAN, KATTIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KUPPADY VILLAGE, NOOLPUZHA, WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.EASWARAN SRI.P.MURALEEDHARAN (IRIMPANAM) RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR, LBS CENTRE FOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, (GOVERNMENT OF KERALA UNDERTAKING), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR SC, LBS CENTRE FOR R2 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.R. SREELATHA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/01/2009, ALONG WITH WP(C) No.36782 OF 2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) Nos.36053 & 36782 of 2008 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 2nd day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioners in these writ petitions have appeared for State Eligibility Test. In so far as the petitioner in WP(C) No.36053/2008 is concerned, she had appeared for the examination held in 2007, and the petitioner in WP(C) No.36782/2008 is concerned, she had appeared in the examination held in 2008. In the writ petitions, all what they are claiming is that they should be given moderation of 5 marks, and on that basis their results should be revised and declared. 2. In my view, these writ petitions are liable to be dismissed for the reason that the claims identical to what is requested in the writ petitions have already been considered and rejected by this Court in several writ petitions. Two such judgments are in WP(C) Nos. 25380/2007 and 25667/2007. In the light of the aforesaid two judgments, the writ petitions fail and are, accordingly, dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg