^ l!Jwa-0 ^•r^% gg^°¥* *^e° '^SLia-S a*¥*tT'iek^°l»a r^l-S f'T'iek^^ a r^o. ei.s A<?*r^!ir» I 1 iSUAKn. W.P r^ rf^^l .^^ljl..?AA^i ,<a Sushma Deve, W/o Shri Harihar Chandrakar, aged about 28 year, resident of Thunupara, P.S. Pipariya, To'hsll l^wsrdha. Ellst ^^birdhsFTt (C.G.) 1 /C 001 !<; vcnous c 7 o. y.. Kamla Bai Sahu, wife of Jagdish Sahu, aged about 35 years, resident of Amiidih, PO Marka, P.S. Pipariya, Tshs I Kswsrdhs, Dlstrict Ksblrdhsm (C.G.). 'Sushite Bai. W/o Ramkun'ssr Srivas, aged about 38 years, resident of BipSara, PO Marka, P.S. Pipariya, Tehsii Kawardha, Dlstrict Kabirdharn (C.G.), ^ _ . Tv1uges|iiya Bai, W/o Rarnji C-ha.nd|akar, aged about 40 years, R/'o T|unupara, Post Marka, P.S. pinariy^. T^hsll Kswsfdhs.. Distrlct tebirdharn (C.G.) Panchl Bsl. W/o Jodhram Jsiswa!, ageu about 38 years, R/o Biptara, Marka P S Pinariva Tehcil Districi (C.G.). Pariniya o'ai, v"v7o ShatrugiTan Sahu, aged about 38 years, R/o Amlidih, P.S. PiDariva, Tehsii •CT ru iviarKa, Kawsrdha. District Kabirdhsm if n\ (.^-..(J..). GQutarbai, W/Q Baldau Sahu, aged about 35 years, R/o Amliuih, PO p t^ pinartvs T^h<5fi ,^—i.ijFU, < ^ii^ii i, DistriGt tebituham, (G.G.5. , . Presiuing Officer, Booth No. 92, the •-r-i-^:E Rjoo|< Kawsrdhs. throuoh Returning Officer (Panchayat), Tehsii Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C-.G.) Presiding Officer, Booth No. 93, B!oGk Kawardha, through the Returning Officer (Panchayat), Tehslj Kawaryha, District Kabirdharn (C-.G.) Shri C.D. Verma, Retuming Officer ^ •A'.P.i'e*iNo.3S4/2011 (Panchayat) & Tehsildar, i^wardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) O Comrnissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur (C.G.) 1 Sub Divisionai Offieer (Revenue), District K^birdham (C.G.) *. sv*^'vt f%ys'^'aT'ts^k*t s »ai?^^r!S ITiCLE 228 OF THECONSTiTUTiON OF ' i Mr. Dtnesh R.K. Tiwari, Advocate forthe petitioner. Mr. Vip'n Sjngh, Adyocate forrespondent No.1 Mr. An/ind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for respondents 10 & 11 <afcEn S S . rf"aS!a4P^S"ff:i ^* *a,"| g^B igA Ai"* C*gaiS_S » i BI 1^'B igA Ai"* C*E !i..liu!wyijsi Heard. his petition was mainly filed against the order dated 22.06.2010 (Annexure-P-3) passed by' respondent No.11 in Election Peiition No. 2/'B-121/2009-10.Byttiesaid order, the Eiection Tribunai ihad overruled the preliminary Qujections raised by the petitioner reiating to iainiainability of the eleotion petition. Thls Court entertalned the writ petitiun and issued notice tu respondent No.1 on 22.02.20'SI, Today, Mr. Vipin Singh, iearneu counsei for respondent No.l/Election petitioner, submits that the election petition Itself has been finally disposed of by the Eiection Trlbunal on 24.03.11 arid the petltion has 'ueen allowed. He further submits that agalnst the said ordgr dated 24.03.11, the petitioner has aiready fiied W.P. (227) No. 1839/2011, in vvhich notices hav'e been issued and interim order dated 06.04.11 has been passed and it has been direeted that ihe effeei and operation of the impuyned order dated 24.03.1 1 passeu in Eiection Petition No. 2/B- 121/2009-10 shai! remain stayed till the next date of hearing. Since, the Eiection petition itseif has been finaliy disposed of by the ElectiuTi Tribunai, this'writ petition filed against the interim order is no'w Decorne-iniFuctuous. m V,? P (S', Mo. SS4/201 ruinaiv, the writ petition has dismissed as navinB Accorainyiy, infructuous. No order as to cost. Sd/- "Sgitil Kumar Sinba' Judge hul