IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT N BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH PETITIONER : Kesharmal Agrawal, aged 65 years, S/o shri Kashmirilal x Agrawal, R/o Khursipar, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G.‘) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : l. State of Chhattisgarh ' x Through Secretary $£§vk" Department of Health And V \Q;% family welfare Mantralaya, . "‘§:{\ D.K.s. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chhattisgarh State Pharmacy Council, Through Registrar, Noorani Chowk, Rajatalab, First Floor, Ayurvedic Hospital compound, Raipur (C.G.) Registration Tribunal ‘ f if Noorani Chowk, Rajatalab, First Floor, Ayurxiedic Hospital jg 4. compound, RaKlpur (C.G.) Pharmacy Council of India Through Registrar, Combined Council‘s Building Temple lane kotia road, Post Box no. 7020, New Delhi //Z// / /f WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 anéwm W“@PNO . . 9.?5/é “2’0 . . y . . ...........................m ............................. mmaf%a WW§WW - %ax%mn%m 09.05.2005 Shri Y.C. Shanna, Advocate with Shri Vemndla Shanna, Advocatn for the pctiu‘oner. Shxi Pankaj Shrivas tava, State/mspopdent No. 1. Panel Lawyer for the Shn' Plashant Mishm, Sr. Advocate with Shn' Sameer Advocate with Shri Ashok Swamkar, Advocate'for respondent No. 3. Shri R.K. Keshaxwai, co unscl for the intcxvcncr. It is stattd thmugh IA. No. 9761/2004 that in the meeting of Pharmacy Council ‘held on 13. 12.2004, a resolution has been passed to the eaeg that in viewof the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble High Coult of Jharkhand, the Chhatu‘sgarh State Pharmacist council has decided that them is no mquimment of prepara Chhattisg‘arh and that all s resident of the State of Chh shall be registered and if the Rules, they will be enlist . registration shall be done und It is further stated that as - members under Section 19 (a) been resolved that after pre shall be conducted nom am n of hrst register in the State of ch certihcate holders who are ttisgarh and are working herein o are found eligible according t It is also stated that other r Section 32 (2) of the Act, 19484 gards the election to elect six of the Pharmacy Act 1948, it has tion of list, as aboveplection st the newly prepared list With area Behar, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Shri Vinay Hark, S1: p o e 'g XI—HL‘QE :ata avwm, W firmwg mm / /: /‘\\ w 49m (0?€2W4 a1 200 m mm§wm %a¥%q3n%w -22 this statement (Vide pala‘Q‘ of LA. No. 9761/2004), a copy of resolution dated 13. 12.2004 has been &h:d as Annexme-D/ 1. In View of this statement of respondent No. 2 and fuxthcr in View of docnmcnt (Annelxum—D/ 1), learned counsel for the petiu'oner prays for dispo a1 of this petition on the above statement fiJad'e at bar. ' cc resolution has almady been passed, this petition stand hnally disposed of at this stage. It is expected that necessary nsequences of the resolution shall be followed by the concernc authon'ty in acconiance with law. A copy of this order piaced in the records of W.P. Not 1082/ 2004 and W.P. No. 1660/ 2004. Certihed cepy as per rples. Sdl— Sunil Kumar Shh?” Judge (@W) A