KBP 7310-09.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7310 OF 2009 M/s.V.S.Roy and Company and anr. ..Petitioners Vs. Yogesh Mansukhlal Shah ..Respondent ......... Mr.Khan Javed Akhtar, for petitioners. Mr.D.A.Barot, for respondent. ......... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J.. DATE : 31 th August, 2009. P.C. : 1] Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners are the defendants in a suit for eviction filed by the respondent. The said suit has been filed under the provisions of the Maharashtra Rent control Act, 1999. One of the grounds for eviction is carrying out permanent construction and alterations in the suit premises. By the impugned order, pending the said suit, the learned trial Judge has permitted the respondent landlord along with his Architect to visit the said premises after due intimation to the petitioners. 2] The order impugned is purely of interlocutory in nature which is capable of being challenged in an appeal which may be preferred by the petitioners against the decree of trial court if the same be adverse to the petitioners. It is obvious that the Architect of the respondent-plaintiff will not visit the suit premises in the capacity as the Court Commissioner. KBP 7310-09.sxw 2 3] Subject to what is observed, above the writ petition is not entertained and the same is disposed of by keeping all the contentions open. ( A.S.OKA, J. )