IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 12TH OCTOBER 2009 / 20TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 26545 of 2008(I) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- M.ZAINABA BEEVI W/O.NAZARKHAN, 52 YEARS HEAD MISTRESS, GLPS, CHENNAMANGALAM, R/AT. VELLUPARAMBIL HOUSE, KIZHAKKEKARA, MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADV. MR.DILIP MOHAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION ERNAKULAM, 2. K.N.SUKUMARAN, HEAD MASTER, GUPS ONAKKUR NORTH. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.MUHAMOOD T.T THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.26545 OF 2008 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of October, 2009. J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed seeking for a direction to implement Exhibit P4 within a fixed time limit. The petitioner who was working as Headmistress of the GLPS, Chennamangalam was transferred as per Exhibit P4 order to GUPS, Onakkoor North. 2. The complaint raised by the petitioner in this writ petition is that even though she was relieved from the duties of Headmistress from the GLPS, Chennamangalam, she could not join the GUPS, Onakkoor North as the 2nd respondent did not permit the same. 3. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the 1st respondent, it is pointed out that there was a senior claimant Smt.K.K.Salma who submitted a petition dated 21.08.2008 against the transfer order issued in favour of the petitioner as per Exhibit P4. Hence an oral direction was given by the said W.P.(C) No.26545/2008 2 respondent not to implement Exhibit P4 order until further orders. Thereafter, Exhibit P4 has been cancelled and a fresh order has been passed as per Exhibit R1(a). It was found that Smt.K.K.Salma is the senior claimant to GUPS, Onakkoor North. Therefore, Exhibit P4 order is no longer in force now. Exhibit R1(a) order has not been challenged in this writ petition also. In that view of the matter, this writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. If the petitioner has got any other grievance, she will be free to raise the same before appropriate statutory authorities. No costs. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp