TS ,-c^ ,,-'^ 6'F 1^^' ( - v^ .~ V-" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 1<?RIT PETITION N0.3^ OF 2001 PETITIONBR ^J ^' ^•"/. ^'..w >^;'^-' ^•'^•t,.'" ,.<^:->"' •yy y RESPOI'TDEMTS Kumari Kreti Saxena, Daughter of :Shri K.C. Saxena, Aged 19 years^ Sfcudent of Bachelor of Fine Arts^ Third Year of Indira Kala Sangeet, Vishx^avidyalaya, Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon, Permanent residenfc of Bansagar Road, Opposlfce Phoolmati Mandir, Tahsil Huzui:, Districfc Rewa.(M',P») V E 3.-.S U S :«n-(l) Chancellor 6r Universities^ Government of ChhafctisgarK^ Raj Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), (2) Indira Kala Sangeet Vlshx^avidyalaya^ Khaigarh, district Rajnandgaon^ Through: its Registrar at Khalragarh^ District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)< WRIT PETITION Ut-IDER ARTOCLES 2.26/227 OF 'THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 3^1'^T 'f^ra*3Tii¥f iCTWTift^T joi ^^ -^N}d4, ^T?l^<i<o, M<ni^^< m •^PTcTS'^N^'«P".9027'2'OOr""""^ 3Ti^r ^^TI^: ^rfN 9.10.200i s Shri prashant MisMr Dr<» N^K.Shukla fol" Shri S.L.Bajaj foij- The petitioner is tted to take her examinati of Fine Arts on the ground the required percentage in University Regulations^ exceptlonal Gases it could because of allment the wrii of afctendence^ 'There is no atteiidence been allowed tc? take her e^ has strenously urged befor^ considered on humanitarlon In my view 19% of attenden^e percentage of minimiim ssions in terms of Regulat; Shri Bajaj ^ubmits that th^ talce the examinations as ari vis lon to permlt the writ to be arranged by the Uni^ ^^sl. ^N^pN '?TR^f ^ t^zt ~<f^5K ^T 3Tf^TH 31T^T ka for the petitioner<» respondent no^l respondent no<»2 aggrieved that she was not Lons of the 3rd year of Bacblor that jBteauea she has not obtained attendence in terms of the ^scribed attendence is 75%< in |be upto 60% <. However^unfortunately petitioner obtained only 19^ Iprovision in whiah she Gould have j;aminations. shri Prashant Mishr^ .me that this matter should b@ jgroand ^ accouiit of sickness^ ' 5 is nowhere near-eb3ut the allowable with all conce- |on prescribed in this regard,, petitioner nay be permitted to Ex student,, There is no pro- ^etttioner to have re-examination I'ersity only for her^ [TT^'^fe^ '::^ ^T^l^T f^TF^ W^T '^lN' €^ 3TT|^T^r^^'^fp^ ^STF^I i^T^: •??}tcT ><£••• counjsel After hearing and.on perusal of the am of tAe view that this writ petltion can! this petition is that if the writ pondents for her examination as considered d sympathet] available opportunity C.C. thj^ rejec|fced petitjioner consideraltion Ex4student yrapathetjically ct)}c3?<n4!'i •Hj^^*1^f^S <F3i-^i< ^T eti^FT ^I^T for the parties Irelevant regulation I ^ relief sought for in not be allowed^ AccordinglT~ [< I may however state approache@ fche res- to permit her to take such request shall be ^for the earliest Ito take such examination^ Sd/- Chief Justice