CWP No.20277 of 2009 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CWP No.20277 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.09.2010 Gian Chand Garg and another ....Petitioner Versus The Commissioner, Hisar Division and others ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raman B. Garg, Advocate for the respondents. ... Alok Singh, J.(Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 29.7.2009 passed by the prescribed authority/Collector, Narnaul, as well as the order dated 9.11.2009 passed by the Commissioner, Hissar, whereby the eviction order was passed against the petitioners under the Haryana Public Premises (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the 1972 Act). Learned counsel for the respondents on instructions from the CWP No.20277 of 2009 2 Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Narnaul, stated that lease of the petitioners has not been cancelled so far and the petitioners are still the lessees. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents, I am of the view that the petitioners are not unauthorized occupants and are in possession as lessees, hence provisions of the 1972 Act cannot be pressed in service against the lessees. In view of the above, orders impugned cannot be sustained. Petition is allowed. However, the Municipal Council, Narnaul, shall be at liberty to pass fresh order as and when the status of the petitioners becomes as authorized occupants. Petition stands disposed of. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 29.09.2010 sk.