Criminal Misc.No. M- 15420 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1. Criminal Misc.No. M- 15420 of 2010 Date of decision:- 22.9.2010 Ranjit Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent 2. Criminal Misc.No. M- 15571 of 2010 Balwinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present:- Mr. Ranjit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG Punjab. RAM CHAND GUPTA J.(Oral) This order shall dispose of two petitions filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail to petitioners in case FIR No. 33 dated 21.4.2010, under Sections 326,323,452 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar, Tarn Taran. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. Co-ordinate Bench of this Court while issuing notice of Criminal Misc.No. M- 15420 of 2010 -2- motion in Crl. Misc. No.M-15420 of 2010 on 24.5.2010, passed the following order:- “ Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the allegations against the petitioner are that she raised lalkara and gave brick bat on the person of Kulwinder Singh. Learned counsel further contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case being the wife of Jaswinder Singh and moreover the petitioner as well as complainant are close relatives. Notice of motion to Advocate General, Punjab for 6.8.2010. In the meantwhile, arrest of the petitioner is stayed.” Co-ordinate Bench of this Court further while issuing notice of motion in Crl. Misc. No. M-15571 of 2010 on 25.5.2010, passed the following order:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been attributed only simple injury and moreover it is a dispute of the property among the relations for which a civil litigation is also pending between the parties. Notice of motion to Advocate General, Punjab for 6.8.2010. In the meanwhile, arrest of the petitioner is stayed.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have joined the investigation in pursuance of the said orders. It has been stated by learned counsel for the respondent- State that the petitioners have joined the investigation and are no more required for any custodial interrogation. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the Criminal Misc.No. M- 15420 of 2010 -3- witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. In view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, orders dated 24.5.2010 passed in Crl. Misc. No.M-15420 of 2010 and dated 25.5.2010 passed in Crl. Misc. No.M-15571 of 2010, granting interim bail to the petitioners-Ranjit Kaur and Balwinder Singh, are, hereby made absolute subject to the compliance of conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petitions stand disposed of accordingly. September 22, 2010 ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) vj JUDGE