1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8807 OF 2009 Waman Krishna Galande & Ors. ...Petitioners vs. Smt.Yedna Sudhila Samuel ...Respondent Mr.Sugandh Deshmukh for the petitioners Mr.Purushottam Chavan for the respondent CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JANUARY 12, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By this Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners who are the original defendants have challenged the order of the trial Court granting temporary injunction which has been confirmed by the Appellate Court. By the impugned order, the petitioners have been restrained from interfering with the possession of the respondent over the suit property without due process of law. 2 After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, I find that no case is made out for interference with the concurrent orders passed by the Courts below. There is a prima facie finding recorded that the respondent has established his possession. The order of injunction is operating since May 2007. No case is made out for interference. It is made clear that that the observations made in the impugned orders are only tentative observations and the suit will be decided on its own merits. 2 3 Subject to what is observed above, Writ Petition is rejected. Hearing of the suit is expedited. The trial Court will endeavour to conclude the hearing before the end of June 2010. JUDGE