: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.406 OF 2008 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.673 OF 2008 IN L.C. SUIT NO.549 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.478 OF 2008 Narendra Ratilal Shah ..Appellant. Vs. Municipal Corportion of Greater Bombay ..Respondents. Mr.Omrakash Pandey i/b.Pandey & Co. for the Appellant. Ms.Geeta Jogalekar for the Respondents - BMC. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 23RD JUNE, 2008 DATED : 23RD JUNE, 2008 DATED : 23RD JUNE, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : Admit. Heard finally. 2. Mr.Pandey states that he erroneously made the statement recorded in the order dated 28th April, 2008 that the owner of the building Keshavlal Dalpatbhai Zaveri resides in the said building. He states that his office address is at Zaveri Bazar, Mumbadevi Road, Opposite Mumbadevi Temple, Mumbai 400 002, as recorded in his letter dated 8th June, 2008 addressed to the Assistant Municipal : 2 : Commissioner. 3. He further undertakes to serve a copy of any letter/notice that may be addressed by the Respondents on the owners personally. 4. In the circumstances, the Respondents are at liberty to issue a fresh notice under Section 351 to the owner of the building and to the Appellant and deal with the allegedly offending structure in accordance with law. 5. Till the fresh order is passed and for a period of eight weeks thereafter, status-quo shall be maintained in respect of the suit structure. 6. Appeal from Order and the Civil Application are disposed of accordingly. ***