f- • fo W THE SON'SLB HIGH COURT OF CSSATTZSCfARH JUDICATURK AT BILASPVK .P. / Sl No. /2009 PETZTIONBK :- ).;.^. ^^^ A^^y/ .>^y ..* y •»:•••' ^ ^>' ' <<<r.^-" ^" RESP01SDENTS; ^€:^T' A<^^5^ R.K. Thakur, S/o Late Shri Mahar Singh, Aged 39 years, Post- Assistant Veterinary Field Officer, Veterinary Dispensary Toyanar District Bijapur ( C.G.) VERSUS J.State of Chhattisgarh Through, Secretary , Depcirtment of Agriculture(vetemiary) Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G-) y' 2. Deputy Director, Veterni'art/ Services Dantewada, Dist- Dantewada (C.G) y^-^^- WRJT PBT1TION UNDBR ARTZCLE 226/227 OF TaECONSTlTUTION OF INDIA n A •!*n»»/l'm_Ajn^a—^<^««- n/' ^ .HIGH COIJRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPL7R WRTT PETmON rS) No.6867 of2009 PETmONEl RESPONDENTS R.K. Taakur VERSUS State ofCSAattisgarh & another VQH PETmON LTNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTmjHON OF INDIA J. Present: Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y. S. Thdsur, Deputy Go\t. Advocate forthe State/respondents. 2. (Passed on 23r" day of November, 2009) With the consent ofleamed counsel appearing for Ifae parties.the matter is 'aeard finailv. Learaed counsel appearmg for the petitioner submits that despite fhe order dated 29 June, 2009 (Aimexure P/l), the petitionei-, working as Assistant Veteriaarv' Field OfBcer at Veterinan' Dispensary, Toyanar, Distriet Bijapur to Gotatola, District Rajnandsaoa. However, the petitioner has not yet been relieved to join the aew place ofposting. Ms. Pandey submits that once the ordsr of transfer has been passed, it is for the govemraent to ensure ihat it is complied with mime.diately. She relies on'a decision ofthe Supreme Court in Sreedam Chandra Ghosh v. State ofAssam & others , ia support ofher contention that ifthe order is not complied with, a direction can be issiied for enforcementthereof. ymi Y. S. Tnakur, leamed Deputy Advocate Oeaeral appearme for the State/respondents, as usual prays for time to seek iastmctions. I am unable to understand asto wfaat instmctions he needs if there is an order on record. If the aforesaid transfer ordar is still in existence. the govemment is under an obligation to comply with the same at once.It is •accordingly directed that the transfer order shali be complied with fbrthwith within a period oftwo weeks. Accordinglv, this petition is disposed of Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge