IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32593 of 2009 Binod Prasad @ Binod Kumar, Son of Late Balli Sah, resident of Mohalla- Mahabir Asthan, P.S.-Sitamarhi, District-Sitamarhi. ……..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ………Opp. Party. ----------- 2/ 12.11.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. A case has been registered for the offence under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and 47-A of the Excise Act. The informant on receiving secret information went to Bharat Sah Market and found, two boys were selling wine after opening the shop. The day on which the occurrence took place was closing date for selling liquors. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the license holder for selling foreign liquor. Allegations are false. The sale register of the petitioner was checked, challans compared and everything was found in the order. As such, there is no reason for instituting the F.I.R. against the petitioner, as no loss of revenue is caused to the State Government. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioner is allowed. He is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on his appearance before the court below within a period of four weeks from today and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 162/08 2 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)