C^t /-— IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. Petitioner Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. ^C^ /2009 Fool Singh Markam, aged about 42 years, S/o R. R. Markam, working as Head Master, Primary School Gujaripura, Vikas Khand - Baderajpur, R/o Village, Post and Tahsil - Vishrampuri, Disfrict - Bastar (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretaiy, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) . Assistant Comrnissioner, Tribal Welfare, Jagdalpur, Bastar (C.G.) Collector (Adivasi Vikash Sakha) Bastar, JagdalpurfC.G.) District Education Olficer, Bastar, near Collector Office, Bas1.ar, Jagdalpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 QF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THE XI-HG—78 3V^V W Ri-1 wirsn^igRw HWWI gwrai 3S[ r*ii<<io4t, sitfly'is, [sxnK-iy ^^m3'"^ 200, 3n^TTra^' (1pf3^tr) wnwHto SIT^I qtrqw<(lt TTTO^ff ^f 'fe1^ ^.Rn^R '^3?RPT 3)1^51 .^?% a MirSM???.?."^ ^.^'^?^' .i"R"F<S:TTr<^' ^iQ- • .Ta.^^'^ ZSS^&f t£S<~S.^^S. ^ y<S; 1, Jf.t»/S< 2.1.07.2.00° SIrri PrashEait Jaiswal, S Sharsia, counsel for the Ms. Suiiits.'Jsiii. P.L. fbr Advocate w i£tiuosei". tlie State. iui Slii'i S-I^^LLlcTicti~< Chalienge ra ttie preseii'] 30.06.2009 (Armexure P/1) which tlie petitioiier who is. School Education depaTtiiien( Pninar}7 School'MaTangpuri, Bi Block Education OiBcer, Block petition is to the order dated |assed by I'espondeQt No.3 by (vorkiii.s as Headinast.er in the has been traiisferred froni ^ick BaderajpLir to the option of Darbha. '.fi^'^'+s-~n^.!~^f~i /^."f^ •no'3"! r^ <s?=1 -fi^-al 'j.J.i.C.U.i-i.^J.l. ~^J1 ••^•u'U-U.Sad l^'^l ^Q-?-,a,-;S r?;S '3 ^OOQ f'hp- T^^1-ftT^r><'^- i-A<a-^>»/iui- ^-i\^, ^.,.^LI\J\J ^' LJUS-l^ ^i^ Li.L.jL'uiX^-^-. froia Mirldle.School Mat-aiigpui) Gaytapara, Maraagpuri, Bader) Eiodified cn 17.6.2009 aud the School, Pujaripai'a, Block'Badej '?^''-c^"'-"''?'^ =^.1 ^ t^ ^^ 'c-^^^^^~4/^t"*'^-^T^ ^ <3 d i.^JLI.l —U-U^lLllSLi.iC tJCU-lJiyi^Cl 1. auother for fhree times aad th| the law or even as per:the tra\ tliat tiie petiUQiier is a ofiice be|i aot to have been traasferred.. Counsel for tlie • State tiie petitioiier is taa.t vlde oiTler was proiaoted aiid was shifted ., Baderaipiir to Priinaiy Schocl, tjpur. Thereafter fhis order wss oeti.tioa.er was posted. at Priia.a.ry ijpur. He subiaits tliat iii a'bout been shifted froin oue •place to saine is not peniiissfble under isfer policy. He further subnuts arer and tlierefore also he ouglit' iaai<e a represcEtanon T.O respc i3e cieeicied stnctlv in accordanc (loiitends that. let the Tietitioaer udent No. 1 aisd tbe same womd swifb. law. v T'l<Bmrf^ XI-HG—78 S^l ^T 'f^'-TJop ^%H 3Tf^T sh+li<ft HWW tb*ira» 'S'si •<iwi<f^, wv^ww, hw-uy. ^......U.B....^.^^ 2oo^ / an^i^^! ('^i^^r) ?^TOIT ^itei an^i L-ounsei lor uie ]: representa.tion. Mowever he issued for deciding the re-pres^ AccordiG.gly, the petitio] the petitioner to inalce a repij wifh.ia. a period of ten days f^ ^>l<<i<n41i ^Hdf ^f fssil^I^K ^sifin sfi^ii |enuoner agrees 10 Taazea i.subinits that directioa m.av be estation so inade expeditioiislv. ll is disposed ofwith a direcnoa to eseutation to tfae respondent No.l •oiu. fhe date of receipt of the copy of &is order, fhe same wo^ld be decided vrithia a period. 'of three weeks jrora the date ofl' Sd/- priunkerD^ater jiudge