'^ G- ^.(.to0° IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. N0. 2-0 4^ /20Q6 EET3TIONER .^^ c^^y y.My /e?"^ .^- ^,^" -s.' 1 Punni Lal Yadav S/o Mahettar Ram Yadav aged about 44 years R/o Vill- Amsena Tah 85 Dist. BUaspur (C.G.) 2. Chandrakanat Sharma / S/o Chinta Ram Sharma Aged about 42 Years R/o Gali No. 4 Near Bajrang Rahi New Sarkanda TahSsDist. Bilaspur ^3. Harishanker Bhardwaj S/o Moti Ram Bhardwaj aged about 40 years R/o Vill- Dhurwakari P.0. Pachpedhi Thana- Masturi Dist. Bilaspur 4. Sarif Lal Bhardwaj S/o R.B. Bhardwaj aged about Years 39 R/o Village- Dhurwakari P.0. Pachpedhi Thana- Masturi Dist. Bilaspur C.G. ^5. Ravindra Sharma S/o Shri Makhan Lal Sharma aged about 41 years R/o Village- Seepat Road Ashok Nager Opp. Saraswati Shishu Mandir Bilaspur (C.G.) /6. Pardeshi Kumar Nirmalkar S/o Shri Dhelu Rana Nirmalkar aged about 36 years R/o VUlage- Senwar P.0. Senwar Tab- Belha BUaspur (C.G.) 7. Sewak RamKersh S/ofcatel Ram aged about 38 years R/o Post- Sakarra P.S. Hirri Dsit. Bilaspur (C.G.) ^8. Govardhan prasad Kousaik S/0 R K Kousaik aged abput 38 years R/o Post- Ghl P.S. •• sarkanda. thakatpur (C.G.) Dsit. Bilaspur / y' 10. Vyash Narayan Kaushik S/o Balaram Kaushik aged about3g years R/o Village- Amsena Tah - Takhatpur Dist. Bilaspur (C.G..) Dev Prasad Kaushik S/o Ram Sahay Kaushik aged about 42 years R/o Village- Amsena Tah - Takhatpur Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS .'^f^^ .^G-'', ^^ ^ .'-*• ,.'' ~z\ob^ •s ^y° BnNi^^^taAr / 1 State ofChhattisgarh Through - the Secretary General Administration Department D.K.S. ^i^ BuUding Raipur (C.G.) ^2. Collector Bilaspur , Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^' -^g ^rptRTO, s'di-y'is, feirey antn'qn FIRI' ^Kno[i'^T?^T antw ^wre ^rittf 27-4-2006 ^mfaTl^'wraf 4 fei^ tiSn^n ^T 3ti;TO 3II%?I , Mrs. Renu Kochar, counsel for ths &stitioners. h\r-a. 5inqh Khehwaha, Sevt. Advocate for the Ashutosh StGte/resDondents. Hear-d both the counsei. The petitioners have prefsrr^d thia writ pstition under Articie 226/227 of the ConsTttution of India, seektng ije'iief thet the respondents may be directed to abaorbthe petifioners in ony vacanjt'appr'opriart'e available post or to work out a scheme to absorbthe petitioners in eJBpr-opricite employment. The petitionera' case is that t^ie petitioners were appoin+ed in the Census Depart'menT as Compiiers on contrae'f for specified durations, The work of the petitioners was found sstisfactory and the competent officerg isaued- good conduct certificate To The petitioner^. The petitioners were retrenched bythe authority on the reasoning of windin^ up of the Regional Tabulation Office. The iSovernment of Madhya Pradesh was -[•he mother Stote and the present Statc of Chhattidaarh is the "part 6f the ^ta+e of Msdhya Pradeah, therefore, the respondents are treatina the petitio|iers as surplus empioyees. The petitioners must be aiven priority in the matter of appointment on Simiiar postsaa per the cireular dated 15 October, 1991 i^sued by t'ne erstwhiie Stffte of Madhya Pradeah. On 19-2-2001, the Std^e of Chhafi-isgarh alao aaid +hot thede ensployees are to be treated.as surpi|is empioyees. Eariier as per circuiar' dated 27-2-1982 (Annexure P-8) r'etrenche^ emptoyees of theCenaua Department were 'iuaia^aaflaintment. The Apex Couri' [liso gave simildr direction in the matt'er or -^. ^'--^ '. w<a<i XI-HC-22 MI^I'qa •f?ai^wi?i Sifflrt^'^T^T ^c). Soma ^si "anqRp!, "s^lwre. fe'Ri'tt 3n^?TRIRR''H^g Sovt. of Tcmi! Nodu and onother pbwici'il-i.tnwi? 4 feCTt ^R^R: ^i 3(f:gli sn^i vs. ®.Mohamed Ameenudd'in and others »epori-edin ittR 1999 Supreme Coui^t 2202. Having heard iearned counsei facts and circumstcances of the caseJ for the purt'ies and having regard to the in view of the above circuicrs and Judsment of the Apex Court, as ond when th^ posts are avuiloble the petitioners' case should also be considered for appoi»|tmenttrecting them as surpius employees and for thaf purpose, the petitiotiers can approach fesponderit ^to.l with appropnate representation. j VVith The direction atorescid, fhe petition stands diaposed of. Partiea are entitied fer certifjed copy of this order. '-•—— — — — Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge l8? [T?t^ ^R^ ^