IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2009 / 27TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 16696 of 2009(F) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. SALEEM UMMER K.V., S/O.K.V.UMMER, AGED 22 YEARS, RESIDING AT KARUPPAM VEETTIL, MUTHUVETTOOR, CHAVAKKAD POST, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. JUSTINE JOSE, 22/374, SASTHA NAGAR, KURUDEKKADE, PUDUSSERY P.O., PALAKKAD. 3. NAJEEM K.P., THUSHARA, S.S.ROAD, CHIRAKKARA P.O., THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.16696 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 17th June,2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioners, who have completed their Engineering Degree Course from a college affiliated to the University of Calicut, had written the 4th and 6th Semester Supplementary Examinations held in June 2008. Apparently, dissatisfied by the marks obtained in the examinations, they had applied for revaluation. They are aggrieved that the results of the revaluation have not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the 4th and 6th Semester Supplementary Examination held in June 2008. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioners in relation to W.P ( C) No.16696 of 2009 2 the 4th and 6th Semester Supplementary Examination held in June 2008, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the applications for revaluation are in order and otherwise correct. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.16696 of 2009 3 W.P ( C) No.16696 of 2009 4 (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.16696 of 2009 5 W.P ( C) No.16696 of 2009 6