BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.RAJESWARAN CRL OP(MD) No.17469 of 2011 KITTU @ RAMAKRISHNAN : PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CITY CRIME BRANCH, PALAYAMKOTTAI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.28/2009 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.SARAVANAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr. C.RAMESH Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 417, 418, 419, 420, 465, 467, 468 and 474 of IPC in Crime No.28 of 2009, on the file of the respondent police. He has approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Heard Mr.M.Saravanan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail by this Court on 27.09.2011 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.12899 of 2011, with a condition to execute sureties within 15 days from the date of receipt of the order copy failing which the anticipatory bail granted would stand dismissed. But since there was a name change in the FIR. But actually his name is Ramakrishnan, but people called him Kittu and therefore, he could not produce sureties before the learned Magistrate concerned and as such the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the very same relief. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has no objection. 5. In the light of the above, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, of course, subject to certain stringent conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the Judicial Magistrate concerned on executing bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for the purpose of interrogation. 7. The petitioner shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 28/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1, TIRUNELVELI 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CITY CRIME BRANCH, PALAYAMKOTTAI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. M.SARAVANAN Advocate SR.No.46181 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17469 of 2011 Date :28/12/2011 NSV/29.12.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/