IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1048 of 2009 SANJAY KUMAR SINGH SON OF SRI KRISHNA SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AKAUNA, P.S. PUNPUN, DISTRICT PATNA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE SOUTH BIHAR REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PATNA THROUGH THE SECRETARY. 4. THE CHAIRMAN, SOUTH BIHAR REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PATNA. ----------- 6 29/01/2010 This writ application came to be filed when memo No. 908 RTA, Patna dated 24.4.2008 (Annexure-4) was issued, by virtue of which permanent stage carriage permit of the petitioner bearing No.63/2004 was recalled on the ground that the vehicle has become 15 years old and is not worthy of being permitted to ply on the road. The vehicle in question is BR-1C-9606. After many round of exchange of pleadings and indulgence having been granted to the petitioner to get the vehicle in question inspected by the statutory authority the position has now boiled down to this that the Motor Vehicles Inspector of Patna in his communication to the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority has certified that - 2 - the vehicle is in the worst condition and it is not fit for plying on the road. If this is the certification of the competent authority with regard to the status of the vehicle of the petitioner, then no interference is required with the impugned order contained in Annexure-4. Even otherwise that order is a conditional order in the sense that the petitioner will be entitled to get his permanent permit renewed or re-issued provided he makes available a note worthy or fit vehicle for plying. The factual position being what they are, no interference is required with the impugned order at this stage. This writ application is, thus, dismissed. AMIN (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)