RIGH COURT OF CHHATTTSGARH AT BILASPITR. Y^tPetmuH.(SlNo,,1115«f20^8 PET!TIONER RESPONBENTS ^^^. Yogendra Kumar Soni, S/o Piran Lal Soni, aged aboiit 53 years, workmg as time keeper, sub divisional office, SDO Rural Engmeermg Service, Gaurela Divisioii, Pendra Road, Distt. Bilaspur, Clihattisgarh. 'VERSUS 1. State of Cliliattisgarh, tlirough its Secretary, Pasichayat & Rural Development Depanment, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. Block Developttient Officer, & Chief Executive Officer^ Janpad Panchayat, Gaurela Distt. Bilaspur (CG). 3. Block Development Officer, office of the Block Development (Block) Gaurela Distt, Bilaspur (CG). 4. ChiefEngineer, Rural Engineermg Sei-vices (RES), office of Development Commissioner, Raipur (CG). 5, Chief Executive Officer, Rural Engineering Sendce, office of Ruml Engineermg Service (RES) Division Marwahi Head Qiiarter Pendra, Distt. Bilaspur. (WRTT PETTTION IJNDER .^RTICIE 226 OF TFTE CONSTTTimON OF INDIA) {SB: Hoii'bie Mr. Safish K. Affl.iiliotn, J.) preseiit : Sliri P,S. Koshy, Advocate with SM Vinod DeshiiiuUi, Advocates for the petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Law^/er for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on 21st ofFebraaiy, 2008) 1- The petitioner impugiis the order dated 16.03.1998 (Aimexiire P/3) passed by the Block Development Officer aiid Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Gaurela, Distt^ Bilaspur (CG) (Respondeiit No. 2), whereimder grant of regular pay scale to the petitioner has been withdrawn. 2 Leamed comisel appeariiig for the petitioner submits that the case ofthe petrtioner is sqiiarely covered by the decision ofthis Court passed on 27.02.2.007 in Writ Petition (8) No. 1861 of 2005 (Ram Dulare Prajapati <fr others Vs. State ofMaclhya Pradesh ancl others) and other comiected matters. 3. Leanied couiisel appearing for the petitioiier flirther siibmits that he has already subiiiitted a represeiitatioii along with copy ofthe judgiiieiit and Sahu order dated 27.02.2007 passed by this Court m W.P. (S) No. 1861 of 2005 {Ram Dulare Prajapati & others Vs. State ofMadhya Pradesh and others)(Supra) and other comiected matters, before the aiithority concemed but till date his represeiitatio!! has not been decided. 4. The judgiiieiit was not iii persoiiam birt in rem, thus, the same would be applicable to all the similari;/ situated candidates m light ofthejudgiiietit and order dated 27.02.2007 passed by this Court in W.P. (8) No. 1861 of 2005 (Ram Didare Prajapati & otkers Vs. State qfMadfya Pfaclesh andothers)(si4pra) aod other comiected matt.ers. 5. !ii view ofthe foregomg, this petitioii is aliowed in the same temis i.e< petitioner is entitled to regijlar pay scale from the date the same has been withdrawn by the impugiied order dated 16.03.1998 (Aimexiire P/3), No order a.st.o costs. _._- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge