IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-2724 of 2011 Date of Decision: 28.01.2011 Roshan Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the petitioner 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in a case FIR No. 80 dated 12.10.2010 under Sections 419, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC registered at Police Station Meharban, District Ludhiana. Perusal of the record reveals that petitioner-accused is the Namberdar of the village where disputed property belongs to the complainant – Sukhpreet Singh was sold by producing impostor before the Sub-Registrar. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that petitioner has identified vendor on the basis of Identity Card produced before him otherwise he does not know vendor personally. Arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner at the face of it does not inspire any confidence for the reason that petitioner-accused is Namberdar and property transferred is also Crl. Misc. No. M-2724 of 2011 2 situated in the same village and it can not be believed that petitioner does not know the owner of the property situated in his village. It seems to be a case of property grabbing. Dismissed. (ALOK SINGH) 28.01.2011 JUDGE reena