IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6626 of 2010 SHANKAR KUMAR JHA S/O LATE MAHAKANT JHA R/O VILL PHADDI, P.S.BEHERA, DISTT-DARBHANGA Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD PATNA 2. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD PATNA 3. THE JOINT SECRETARY (GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT), BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD PATNA 4. THE GENERAL MANAGER CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER, MITHILA ELECTRICITY SUPPLY DIVISION DARBHANGA 5. THE ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, URBAN ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION DARBHANGA 6. THE ELECTRICAL SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION SAMASTIPUR 7. THE ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION SAMASTIPUR 8. THE ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION DALSINGSARAI (SAMASTIPUR) 9. THE DEPUTY ACCOUNTS DIRECTOR, MITHILA ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION DARBHANGA ----------- 2 19.04.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the respondent-Board. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon the death of his father in harness on 13th June, 2007 while working on the post of Head Clerk in the Electric Supply Sub-Division, MohidiNagar, Dalsingsarai, District- Samastipur, the death-cum-retiral dues have not been settled and paid as yet. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Board submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.3. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable could also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)