IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3134 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.3134 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.3134 OF 2005 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:------------------------------------ Mr.P.B.Shah with Smita Mane for the petitioner. Ms.P.H.Kantharia for respondent nos.1 to 4. CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2005 DATED: 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2005 DATED: 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2005 P.C.: . By this petition, the petitioner claimed a direction to the respondent to settle the claim of the petitioner in terms of the order passed in W.P.No.894 of 1996 on 19.11.2000. The petitioner has enclosed the order to this petition and the relevant part reads as under: "The Collector shall issue public notice to all the concerned landholder in the restricted zones within a period of 8 weeks from the date of his appointment. The collector shall thereafter hear the landholders including the petitioners and pass appropriate award in accordance with the provisions of section 12 preferrably within a period of one year from the date of receipt of the claims from the landholders." 2. From the above quoted order, it will be seen that it encompasses not only the petitioner in that petition but also the other concerned landholders in the restricted zones. Therefore the order would cover the claim of the petitioner also. Reserving the liberty to seek action under that order before the Collector, this Petition is accordingly disposed of. ****