IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 39 of 2009 Between: Smt. Mudireddy Prameela W/o. Venkat Ram Reddy R/o. Annaram Kalan, Pitlam Mandal, Nizamabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nizamabad. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bodhan Division, Nizamabad District. 4 The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Pitlam Mandal Parishad, Pitlam, Nizamabad District. 5 Munnuri Pushpalatha W/oSrinivas Pitlam Mandal, Nizamabad District. 6 Chevula Satyavva W/o. not known Pitlam Mandal, Nizamabad District. 7 Madduri Sridevi W/o.Ashok Pitlam Mandal, Nizamabad District. 8 Abbanaboina Chinna Sayulu S/o. not known Pitlam Mandal, Nizamabad District. 9 Narmala Machaiah S/o. not known Pitlam Mandal, Nizamabad District. 10 Vibuthi Mutyalu S/o. not known Pitlam Mandal, Nizamabad District. 11 Bamani Anjaiah S/o. not known Pitlam Mandal, Nizamabad District. 12 Mareddy Devender Reddy S/o.Linga Reddy Pitlam Mandal, Nizamabad District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Notice vide No.E2/3040/2008 dated 22- 12-2008 issued by the 3rd respondent i.e., Revenue Divisional Officer, Bodhan Division, Nizamabad District for holding a meeting of Mandal Parishad on a public holiday i.e., 8-1-2009 at about 10-30 A.M. in the office of Mandal Parishad, Pitlam, Nizamabad District for considering the no confidence motion moved against the petitioner under Section 245 of the A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and the Rules made there under i.e., rules relating to the Motion of No Confidence Against Upa-Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat, or President or Vice-President of Mandal Parishad, or Chair Person or Vice-Chair Person of the Zilla Parishad issued vide G.O.Ms.No.200, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development (Mandal-I) Dated 28-4-1998 published in A.P. Gazette R.S. to Part VII- Ext. Dt. 5-5-1998 as illegal, arbitrary and vitiated as the whole proceedings are contrary to the Rule 5 of the Rules. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.RAVI KIRAN RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.39 of 2009 Order: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 02.06.2009 VGB