THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED C.R.P.No.901 of 2010 ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 05.02.2010 passed in I.A.No.104 of 2010 in I.A.No.58 of 2010 in O.S.No.107 of 2010 by the learned VI Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, wherein the petition filed under Order V Rule 20 CPC seeking to order show cause notice by way of substituted service in Telugu daily newspaper, was dismissed. 2. The petitioner herein is the plaintiff and the respondent herein is the defendant in O.S.No.107 of 2010 filed for recovery of money on the basis of a promissory note. In I.A.No.58 of 2010 filed under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC by the petitioner, the trial Court passed an urgent order directing the respondent to furnish security to the suit amount within two days from the date of the said order, failing which attachment will be effected. The petitioner states that when the Court Bailiff went to the schedule premises to execute the warrant, the respondent left the premises without any instructions and his whereabouts are not known. Therefore, he filed I.A.No.104 of 2010 and the same was dismissed by the trial Court. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed the present civil revision petition. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently contended that Order V Rule 20 CPC is made applicable to the interlocutory applications by virtue of Section 141 CPC and that the trial Court has committed error in dismissing the application. 4. Section 141 CPC reads as under: “ Miscellaneous proceedings-The procedure provided in this Code in regard to suit shall be followed, as far as it can be made applicable, in all proceedings in any Court of civil jurisdiction”. The above said Section clearly postulates that the procedure provided in the Code of Civil Procedure shall be followed in all proceedings in any Court of civil jurisdiction. Therefore, the provision of Order V Rule 20 CPC is made applicable not only to the proceedings in the suit but also to the interlocutory applications. The trial Court has committed error in dismissing the application filed seeking to order show cause notice by way of substituted service as the notice of attachment is ordered to be executed on the respondent, whose whereabouts are not known. 5. In the circumstances, the order impugned is set aside and the matter is remitted to the trial Court for consideration afresh in accordance with Section 141 CPC. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed. No order as to costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J Date:05.03.2010 sj