IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 3498 of 2010. Date of Decision: 26th February, 2010. Dhillon Highways Petitioner through Mr. B.S.Giri, Advocate Versus State Transport Commissioner, Punjab & Anr. ..Respondents through Mr. B.S.Chahal, DAG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. B.S.Chahal, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to call for any counter-affidavit from the respondents. The solitary grievance of the petitioner is that the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Punjab, which is headed by an officer in the rank of District & Sessions Judge, has passed an order dated 12.11.2009 [Annexure P-1] granting one Regular Stage Carriage permit to operate One return trip daily on Barnala- Chandigarh via Dhanaula, Sangrur, Bhawanigarh, Patiala, Rajpura, Banur and Zirakpur route. However, the said order is not being implemented by the respondents. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the reasons assigned by a Division Bench of this Court in its order dated July 28, 2006 passed in CWP No. 11468 of 2006 [Highways Bus Service Regd., Patiala v State Transport Commissioner, Punjab & Anr.], a copy of which has been appended as Annexure P-3, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to implement the order dated 12.11.2009 passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Punjab, provided that there is no legal impediment in implementation thereof and/or the same has attained finality. The needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Disposed of. February 26, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE