@ HEGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT B!LASPUR ‘ Writ Petitian (S) N6. 4088 of 2007 Pemcnef Shivnandan Pmsad .Lahafe, S/o Sadhuram, Aged about“ 37 years, Rio Bhandora. Thana Malkharoda, aéstrict Janjgir — Champa (CG). Respondents 1. Staze of Chhamsgarh. Through Secremry, Department of Tribai Welfare. D.K,S. BuiMing, Mantralaya, Ramw. {Chhattisgarh). Commissioner, Tribai Deveiopment, Raipu.’ (Chhattisgarh). Coliecfor (Tribai Warfare). Eisirict Jamgir - Champa (G.G.). Versus District Organézer, Trrba} Wekfare, Dist, Janjgir — Champa (Chhattisgarh). WRH PETITGIN UNDERARTmLE 22_6 OF THE C§NSTITUTION OF INDIA S§ng£e Bench : Hon‘bEe Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri. J. ShriVVishnu Kostha, Advocate for the petmoner. Shri A. S. Kachwaha, Deputy Advccate Genera} fer the respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 14"" day of February, 2008) 1. The petitiener hee impugned the order dated 3.8.2002 (Annexure P/1) in this petitten. 2. The petitioner had impagned this order eariier also in WPNe. 5023 cf 2005 (Shivnandan Pmsad Lehere Vs. State cf Chhettisgarh & others). This Ccurt. after having considered the submissions of the petitioner, en 20.10.2005 passed the foiiowing order : - “Since the order, appears to have been passed purely as an interim measure, i em not inclined to mierfere in this writ petiir‘o'r; against each erder fiied under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. i‘he .oeiition has no merits. it is dismissed at {he motion stage itsei , " @ Once this very impugned afder dated 3.8.2002 (Annexure PH has been ) considered by a coofdinate Bench, no Wm is maintainabke. chaHenging the same owes: m véew of the foregoing. this setmon is dism§ssed as not mainminabte. However, the respondentelauthor§ties may take stepe to compiete the scrutiny and pass appropriate order expeditiousty, in accordance with taw, if it is already not done, sm— ‘r Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur