IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 181 of 2008 (S/B) Sohan Lal ……Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …Respondents. Mr. B.C. Pande, Senior Advocate with Mr. H.C. Pathak, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Advocate for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 4. Mr. B.D. Kandpal, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J, (Oral) Learned counsel for the rival parties are agreed that the controversy raised in the instant writ petition is identical to the one adjudicated upon by this Court in Lt. Gen. (Retd). Dr. M.C. Bhandari Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others (Writ Petition (S/B) No. 182 of 2008) decided on 15.4.2010. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is allowed in the same terms as Lt. Gen. (Retd) Dr. M.C. Bhandari’s case (supra). (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 15.4.2010 Rathour