IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.35790 of 2009 MADAN MAHTO @ PARMA MAHTO, son of Late Kuldip Mahto, R/o Village – Bingawa, P.S. Patori, Distt. Samastipur ………………………………………………….… Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……………..…… Opposite Party. ----------- For the Petitioner:- Mr. Upendra Kumar, Advocate. For the State:- Mrs. Indu Bala Pandey, A.P.P. ---------- 2. 16.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 448, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that was not apprehended on the spot; rather he has been made an accused on the basis of the statements of co- accused persons, who were apprehended on the spot. It is also stated that the trial has been bifurcated; however, the first informant has not named any person in his deposition, which has been brought on record as Annexure-2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the petitioner, Madan Mahto @ 2 Parma Mahto to be released on bail on his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Hazipur (Vaishali) in connection with S. Trial No. 296/09, arising out of Jandaha P.S. Case No. 49 of 1997. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )