IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** FAO No.758 of 1988 DATE OF DECISION: 26.11.2010 **** Pritam Singh . . . . Appellant Vs. Smt. Lali . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: - None for the appellant. Mr.Sanjay Mittal, Advocate for the respondent. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. (ORAL) This appeal is directed against the order of Gurdian Judge, Rohtak dated 17.8.1988 by which custody of minor Tapan Kumar was ordered to be handed over to the wife. Aggrieved against the impugned order, present appeal was filed on 22.8.1988 in which on 23.8.1988, notice was issued and operation of the impugned order was stayed. Admittedly, minor Tapan Kumar was 2½ years of age at the time when the petition was filed in the year 1986. Now about 24 years have passed and minor Tapan Kumar has apparently become major. Therefore, the question of his custody does not arise and as such the present appeal has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) November 26, 2010 JUDGE Vivek