IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23586 of 2010 SANJAY KUMAR SAH @ SANJAY SAH & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are businessmen, not named in the F.I.R. are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 387 of the Indian Penal Code. During investigation it has come that these petitioners being the businessmen gave the telephone number of the informant to the accused Rana Mian who made a ransom call. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that on even assuming the statement of the witnesses, no case under Section 387 or 120B of the Indian Penal Code is made out against the petitioners and the petitioners have been roped in the present case due to the business rivalry. Though petitioner no. 1 was earlier implicated in a case due to the malicious attitude of the local police, whereas petitioner no. 2 has no criminal antecedent. Considering the nature of involvement surfaced during investigation, let the petitioners, namely, (1) Sanjay Kumar Sah @ Sanjay Sah (2) Dilip Sah @ Pappu Sah in the event of their arrest or surrender 2 before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Indrani Kisku, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bhagalpur in connection with Bhagalpur Kotwali P.S. Case No. 221 of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Anand Kr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)