IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20013 of 2009 JAI KUMAR YADAV son of late Satya Narayan Yadav, resident of village Gopalpur, P.S. Kumarkhand, District Madhepura, … …Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR… …Opposite Party For the Petitioner: Mr. Radheshyam Prasad, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastri, A.P.P. ----------- 3 06.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner has been made accused in a case under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegations are of bank dacoity and the first information report is against unknown persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been made accused only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused persons and on the basis of that, a blue cap had been recovered from him. However, even though the petitioner in jail custody since 21.03.2009, he has not been put on test identification parade. Learned counsel for the State could not controvert that on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused, the petitioner has been made accused in this case. He, however, submitted that a blue cap supposed 2 to be of the security staff of the Branch had been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, Jai Kumar Singh, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in Banmankhi(Janki Nagar) P.S. Case No. 108 of 2007 on further condition that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)