1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO. 515 OF 2009 L & T. Finance Ltd. .... Petitioner vs Sadashiv R. Kale & 2 ors. .... Respondents Mrs.S.I.Joshi i/b.S.I.Joshi & Co. for the petitioner. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 12th August, 2009 P.C.: 1 None appeared for the respondents. By private notice, the petitioners have served the notice twice. Considering the averments so made which remained un- controverted and that shows that the respondents failed to pay any further instalment since 2007. They are in possession of the vehicle and enjoying/using the same. 2 As averments remained un-controverted and as case is made out. I am inclined to grant prayer (a) except bracketed portion. This Court has already granted prayer (d). Having once granted prayers (a) and (d), I think, nothing survives in this petition. The petition is accordingly allowed in terms of prayers (a) and (d) with liberty. 2 3 The liberty is granted to settle the matter. The liberty is also granted to the petitioner to take police assistance, if any. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)