1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.372 OF 2009 WITH C.A.NO.1127 OF 2009 Shri.Pyaran K. Mulani and ors. ..Appellants. Vs. Gulab D. Mulani. ..Respondent. Mr.S. Katol i/by P.A.Pol for the Appellants. Mr.P.B.Shah for the Respondent. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 21st January, 2010 PC : 1 This is a second appeal filed by the original defendants. The record indicates that the original defendants are his daughter in law and her children who had filed a suit for injunction. That suit was dismissed by the trial court and this finding was confirmed in the first appeal by the District Court and in Second Appeal by the High Court. The finding in the first litigation is that the plaintiff respondent in this appeal is the owner and the property is self acquired property. 2 Injunction sought by the grand daughter and defendant in this suit was rejected. Thereafter, the present suit was filed by the plaintiff -respondent for injunction. Both the courts have decreed the plaintiff s suit. There are thus finding of five courts against the present appellants. No substantial question of law therefore, arises and therefore, second appeal is summarily rejected. C.A.NO.1127 OF 2009 1 As the main appeal is rejected, this application does not survive and the same is also rejected. ( R.S. MOHITE, J.) `