IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH PETITIONERS -ffi^4^r^ t^ ^ .0 ^^ '"AS^Q' /df^' 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. W.P 227/No.. .°^.t<1R...../09 Sukhnandan S/o Late Bishal Chandrakar, age 50 years'. Bhusan S/o Late Bishal Chandrakar, age 38 years. RohitS/o Late Bishal Chandrakar, age 36 years. - Puria Bai D/o Late Bishal Chandrakar, age 53 years. Urmila Bai D/Q Late jBishal Chandrakar, 1 age48 years. Shail Kumari D/o Late Bishal Chandrakar, age46years. Dulari Bai D/o Late Bishal Chandrakar , age 42 years. Dhal Singh S/o Late Puranik Chandrakar, age 48 years. ArjunSingh S/o Late Puranik Chandrakar, age40 years. Kaushliya Bai D/o Late Puranik Chandrakar, age 55 years. Savitri Bai D/o Late Puranik Chandrakar, age 50 years. All R7o village Vinayak Pur Tehsil & DistrictDurg (G.G.) ^ Durvasha S/o ManrakUan Chandrakar, age 60 years. Rekli Lal S/o ManraKhan Chandrakar , age 56 years . Krishna Kumar S/o Manrakhan Chandrakar, age 50 years. i PFF~ 15. Janak Bai D/o ManraKhari Ghandrakar, ^ge 58 years. r 16. Makund S/o Punit Chandrakar, age 50 years. . 17. Ajit S/o Punit Chandrakar, age 58 years. 18. Teman Lal S/o Punit Chandrakar, age 55 years. 19. Gopal S/o PunitGhandTakar,age 45 years. 20. SaraswatiBaiD/oPunitChandrkar,age40 years. Appellant No. 12 to 20 is the resident of Village - Lohar Singh, Tehsil - Patan, District Durg,(C.G.) : VERSUS- . , - . RESPONDENTS ~^: 1. , Gopendra S/o Late Bodhan Chandrakar, age 20years. 2. Kamal Narain S/o Late Bodhan Charidrakar, age 18 years. 3. Khileshwari D/o Late Bodhan Chandrakar, age 16years. ; r 4. Deep Mala D/o Late Bodhan Chandrakar, age 14 years.Respondent No. 3 • to 4 through Natural guardiaii Smt. Nirmla Bai Wd/b Late Bodhan; Chandrakar, age 42 years. 5. Smt. Nirmal Bai Wd/o Late Bodhan Chandrakar, age 42 years. Above said all Respondents are the resident of Village - Vinayalc Pur, TehsU & District - Durg, (C. G.) . : • ^ ! !"; '^ ,: 6. . State bf Chhattisgarh through Collector Durg(C.G-) PETITIONU/A227 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA 7Sf •<iww^,w\wi<o, hv\wy. ...15i.-f?.C^2^)......B-l^o.. Sil^r T^q? (1clt'la<y) (<;•))<*] l**<i<* Sahu 214.06.2009 B.Hmi'MeShri Justice N.K. Aaarfwal Shri Uttam Pandey, Advocate f()r the petitioners Leamed counsel appearing for ®kspermission of this eourt to wit^draw this petition with liberty avail appropriate remedy that ma;! p|rovisions oflaw. Prayer is allowed. Consequently, the petition is d^smissed as withdrawn with the a|x)ve stated liberty. No order asto cc|sts. Learaed counsel for the petitioi^ers prays that certified eopy of tjie impugned order be retumed to hir|t. Registry is directed to retu^n the certified copy of the npugned order on counsel's famist t>l<llcl«illIHfll ^ feZ> <Fa|^l< ^••aifOTan^i the petitioners, on instruction, be available to him under the - ing aulfaenticated troe copy of le same. Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge :B-