^ ;!N!iLt Ktr»l?r £S3 c" } CW/^- IN THE mOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S| No. 7 7 ^^f2QQ7 PETITIONER .-• ^^ ^•y^ .*'' ^'..•^\y^- ^^if\fyy »?•?' 'rtf-' ^/ RESPONDENTS ^ -co^ ^^y^ §.«-tO ~w!^M!:s;Ssyy ;1. 2. j. Taraehand Sahu, Aged about 43 years S/o Heeralal Sahu, Assistant - 2, O/o Deputy Veterinary Services, District : State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretaiy, Department ofVeterinary Services, Mantralay-D. Bhawan, Raipiir- Veterinary Services, Near Guru Tej Bahadur Park, G.E. Road, Raipur (CG). Joint Director, Veterinary Services, Jagdalpi-ir, Dist : Bastar-(C.G.) Deputy Director, Veterinaiy Services Dhaintari, District : Dhamtari (CG). Dist: Dhamtari-(C.G.) w WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 225 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN 0¥IStOlA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERs As stated in the cause titie above. HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASSUR Writ Petition (S) No. 777 of 2007 Petitioner Tarachand Sahu Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & others Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agniho'h'i. L- Present: Mr. S. K. Thomas, Advocate for the petitioner. AAr. Sushil Dubey, (Sovernment Advocate for the State/respondents. O R & 6R (Passed on 8tl> &ay of February, 2007) The foilowing order of +he Court was passed by Satish K. ^nihotri, J. 1. Learned counsel appeoring for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed <as Cterk on ad hoc bosis by order dated 24.11.84 (P/l) by the Joint Director, Veterinary Services, Jagdalpur, District-Basto-. The petitioner continued as ad hoc Clerk tilt he was regularized in service on 29.3.90 (P/2). 2. Learned counse! for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitted to grant of annuai increnients in view oi Circuior No. C/S-5/93/3/One dated 12.5.1993 (P/4) issued by the Sovernment of Madhya Pr-adedi. ©ener-ai Administrative Department. In view of the said circular, the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to make a representation before the concerned authorities for 9rant of annua! increments, to which lear'ned counsel appearing for the respondents/State has no objection. 3. In the event a representation is made, the respondents authorities may consider the same, in accordance with law, on its own merit, within a period of eicjht weeks from the receiot of reor'esentation. if anv. 4. The petition stands accordin9ly disposed of with the above stated liberty. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- Satisb K. Agn Judge Thakur