IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 4TH DECEMBER 2006 / 13TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 31943 of 2006(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ PRADEEP.M.V., AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, MARADAN HOUSE, MANICKAMANGALAM P.O., KALADY. BY ADV. SRI.T.K.SHAJAHAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. KALADY PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, KALADY. 2. JOSE MATHEW, KOLENCHERRY HOUSE, MANICKAMANGALAM P.O., KALADY. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C)NO. 31943 of 2006 ---------------------------------- Dated this 4th day of December, 2006 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is that the first respondent Panchayat is going to issue licence to the 2nd respondent for the conduct of a brick kiln without considering Ext.P1 objection, which has been submitted against the grant of licence by the petitioner and several other residents of the locality. I do not propose to examine the merits of the various grounds raised in this writ petition. This writ petition, will stand disposed of with the following directions: If licence is not issued to the second respondent, the first respondent Panchayat will take up Ext.P1 also along with the licence application submitted by the 2nd respondent, hear the petitioner as well as the 2nd respondent and take a correct and just decision on the licence application considering Ext.P1 also, at the earliest and at any rate within three weeks of their receiving a copy of this judgment. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE Judge WPC No.31943/2006 2 dpk