IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3313 of 2007 SHAMBHAVI KUMARI Versus THE TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- 3. 25/08/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the University. Petitioner has filed this writ application for a direction to the respondents to issue admit card for appearing in the examination of M.A. Previous (English), which was scheduled to be held from 23rd March, 2007, so that the petitioner may appear in the examination for the purpose of improvement of her result in M.A. (English). A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents in which it is stated that after publication of result of the petitioner in M.A.(English), she applied for appearing in three papers of M.A. Final Year Examination for the purpose of improvement of her result. She was permitted to do that and she appeared in three papers and improved her marks in one paper which was added in her marksheet. It is stated that now petitioner has applied for appearing in 5th paper of her previous examination for improvement which is not permissible as per - 2 - regulation of the University. The fact that after publication of the result of M.A. Final Year petitioner applied for appearing in three papers of final year examination for improvement and she was allowed to appear, shows that opportunity available under Regulation 33(1) was availed by the petitioner. However, the regulation does not permit any second opportunity to a candidate to appear in any examination for improvement of the result. In the circumstances, since the petitioner has already availed the opportunity, it is not possible for this Court to issue any direction to the respondents to permit her again for the purpose. In the result, I do not find any merit in this writ application. The same is accordingly dismissed. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)