IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15573 of 2009 Date of Decision: October 13, 2009 Chhota Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Jagdev Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to restore pensionary/ retiral benefits to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the matter is covered by judgment dated 22.7.2009 rendered by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.15397 of 2007 titled `Amrik Singh vs. State of Punjab & Others’. Notice of motion. CWP No.15573 of 2009 [2] Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, on the asking of the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents contends that indeed the matter is covered by the judgment in Amrik Singh’s case (supra). In view of the above, this petition is allowed in terms of judgment dated 22.7.2009 rendered by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.15397 of 2007 titled `Amrik Singh vs. State of Punjab & Others’. (AJAI LAMBA) October 13, 2009 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?