IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 21ST APRIL 2009 / 1ST VAISAKHA 1931 WP(C).No. 12460 of 2009(B) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- UNNIKRISHNAN @ UNNI, AGED 61, S/O.THANKAM, KALAPURAKAL HOUSE, ELAMKULAM, RAVINDRAN ROAD, CHILAVANNOOR, KADAVANTHRA, COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CORPORATION OF COCHIN, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE COCHIN CORPORATION BOAT JETTY, COCHIN. 3. THE ZONAL OFFICE, CORPORATION OF COCHIN, VYTTILA, REPRESENTED BY THE MUNICIPAL ENGINEER. 4. SHINE, S/O.SREEDHARAN, PALAKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, RAVINDRAN ROAD, CHILAVANNOOR, KADAVANTHRA P.O., COCHIN. SMT. R. BINDU, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.12460 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 21st day of April, 2009 J U D G M E N T Allegation made in this writ petition is that the 4th respondent is attempting to construct a residential house, in violation of the provisions contained under the Building Rules. The petitioner submits that by filing Ext.P2, he has brought this to the notice of the 2nd respondent, but complains that the 2nd respondent has not taken any action on Ext.P2. 2. Having regard to the facts as stated above, without expressing anything on the merits of the claim raised in the writ petition, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P2 with notice to the 4th respondent also as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg