IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. Nos. M- 1035 of 2010 Date of decision: 15.12.2011 Nachhatter Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. K.K. Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, DAG, Punjab for the State. Mr. Sukhmeet Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 6. ***** RANJIT SINGH J. In this case, the petitioner seeks direction for transferring the investigation to some independent agency like CBI. As per the allegation made in the petition, husband of the petitioner died for which FIR No. 250 dated 10.10.2001 was registered under Sections 302, 467, 468, 471 and 34 IPC. The petitioner has a grievance that despite evidence of murder, the police has submitted cancellation report. This fact is disputed by the State. In the reply filed, it is disclosed that on the direction of the Court further investigation has been held on more than one occasion. Even now, the investigation is in progress but no clue in regard to murder has been found. The investigation has rather shown that the husband of the petitioner died while spraying pesticides. The cancellation report has, accordingly, been prepared. Crl. Misc. Nos. M- 1035 of 2010 -2- The cancellation report, which is submitted or is to be submitted shall not be accepted without notice to the complainant/petitioner. The petitioner would be at liberty to contest the cancellation report, which is stated to have been filed. In addition, the petitioner may also file a protest petition, which would be considered and dealt with in accordance with law. If the petitioner is left with any grievance, it would be open to her to have her remedy in accordance with law. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. December 15, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE