IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.453 of 2010 GANESH MISTRY SON OF LATE KAILU MISTRY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PATOI (DUJURG) P.S. RAFIGANJ, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PATNA ZONE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MAGADH RANGE, GAYA 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AURANGABAD 6. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ( H.Q) AURANGABAD 7. THE OFFICER IN CHARGE CUM I.O., RAFIGANJ POLICE STATION, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD 3 17.01.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that Rafiganj P.S. Case No. 146 of 2008 registered for the alleged offences under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code is not being properly investigated since up-till-now no police report has been submitted and the petitioner, who is the informant, a poor person, is getting constant threats from the accused persons compelling to compromise the matter. Learned counsel for the State submits that the investigation is almost complete and the police report is likely to be submitted very shortly. In the above circumstances, no further direction is called for. However, the respondent no.5 shall look into the matter so that the police report is submitted in accordance with law without delay as it has been submitted on behalf of the State that the police report is likely to be submitted at the earliest. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)