' cf^ INTHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Misc.Aooeai No. ^^ /2010 Sngfe Bencft APPELLANT tefendant No.l ^ ^\^)1'. ^^ ^ \.^- ^Tameshwar Dhritlahre^ S/ o^ Jhapar, aged about 45 years, R/o Gatapara, ?A p.c. No. 130, Tahsil Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS \y Suryakant Sur S/o late T.C. Sur, aged about 45 years, R/o Shailendra Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.). State of Chhattisgarh, through Collecfor, Raipur (C.G.). APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 (rl CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908 ^.'-w-.' '.- \^^^ <:!:^.:-'-'"^ "".,z^^"? ^y' _^....."' ^^ESESPONDENTS : /IPlamtiff Def^ridant No.2. ^ ^; :.:l:]i[(il^ i^i^il®iBiiiii^itE-i^ ;^;l!S.^S'IIon?;Mi«Iiat^^an^ -Misc.-'^Dt»eal^o.^^:10,'::;i^^ :1'^PPEI^ANII^:.:':^1 ::.,;'..'.'.r'.;^^ ^yersus.1.1-.'1^ 'RE§p^g E22^.'^.^^^:^^^^ .^Be^nc(K.,1'^l:l',:;,':1--'^ )SHi|^a1?^e]tid]^ Shn ^a^ Dwived^ I)et^^ State^pottdetrt^.2^^::':.,i^::^i; ;^ 1-^^^^:!'.:'':1;'?1...,;-,::' :,^^i^^N]^Rli>iBE^43,R^iEl:l^lC<i^ ;':^ODE.^908"'::-^^';^1.::.:1^. ORAI.QRDER (4.08.^10) Inas^^^^ restrainedappeUatib^lefendanf^^^ propertyduringthependenc^^ftiiesuil. (2^^^ ^ 21/06/2QG!^oi^^pleadmgsinter^^t^ agreemeritasimtofRs.7,50,000/-wasp^ •;j.l^:::-: it was agreed that a^ .;1:- shall be paid^^^ a^ 11.''/<':';^1'.'1:-''1.1^'':.;'':-:'/,.'.1'1''-^^ AccoKlingNth&plamti^^nsptteo^ contacts made wrtfi the defendant ;No. l, he refusecl tb^ e^Gute ^ .•i ^sale-deed..:;..,-1':::'.:;! ..•:':-'.^ t (3) Prayerfbr gran^^ pleadmgs with furthersubmissitm .^ ^ c) -2- favour of thir<l pai^ during the pendency of lAie suit, the plaintiff shall suflfer irreparable loss and that^^^^ llitigation. :::'! •..''.'^il.;';';l;.''^^ (4) The defendant faasi argued 1llattthe plaintiffhimselfwas at fault and has failed to perform hisr p£u1;o^tfae cohtfactjand that the plaintiff camiot bepennittedtofafcebene^c^hisown^mistal^ (5) Goimsel ^ the a^pellanthas argued^^^ ncrt apprectated1:he material available on recorcl^^a^ peryersefmdihgandthatuocase^grantoftetapo^ &vouroftheplaititiffwasmadeout.^^^^^^^^^^^^^ (6) Havmg heard leamed<^urisel forto ^ of record, thi& court JSads 1hat the trial courtl^ available^atrts andmatje^ thefindmgthattheplaintiff^saprima^ec (7) It has alsb been foui^ favour of plaintiff and he shall sufifer irreparable loss, if tempbrary ;i. injunction is not granted. There is noithing in thp order of trial court which would indiGate that title fiadirigs have ibeen recorded in a perverse and Ulegal mamier aiid tfaat the discretioa fw temporary injunction has been exercis^d witUout Gprisidering the three pUlars of^rant <3ftemporaiy injunction. Once trial^ exercised its discretion to grant temporary ityulnction, the appellate court can inferfere only when the mipugned ordef suffers fi-om such ^' -^ it^ findmgwhichabpersonbforduiMyprudeh^ basis ofmaterial avaHable^o^ cburt can intei^re ^y wh^ there^^^^^ injustice committed by the Ir^ forgrantoftemporaryinjunction.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ (8) In the opmiou ofthis court,^^^^^ 1 ••1".- ,—".^ irregularity in^eorderpassedby^etri^cK^ (9) This appeal fherefore ^fails and is dismtssedl ^ (IQ)LeamedcounselfbrtheappeUaritsubmits^^^^ proceeds &r a^ s<Aeduled caste pereon shaU suffer irrepara^ submission, it is directed tUaf^ trial ccmrt effortto disposeofthesmtasearlyaspossibleandprefer^^ a periodofSmQnthsfi^tltedafeof^^^^ of1^isordefby1^eappeUantbefbre1^t^ —•&•"""