^' IN THE HON'BLE HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION N0.............../2006 PETITIONER .•^\^ >?* ^ ^-£> '"..••'_ (^••;" •--••' ?y /'^yy ^•-^ Q-'^^ R^Sf?6KlDtNTS ^ --•.^/ ^^^.^y ...^•1 Dashrath Lal Kodaku S/o Late Shri Suru - Ram aged about 54 years presently wroking as permanent Gangman (P.W.D.) R/o Village -Birnipali, Teh. Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. StateofChhattisgarh through its Secretary, ^ PublicWorksDepartment, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Engineer-in-Chief, PublicWorks Department, f Near'RajBhawan', Distt.Raipur(C.G.) 3. Superintedning Engineer, PublicWorks Department, BilaspurDivision, Distt. Bilaspur(C.G.) 4. Executive Engineer, ^ PublicWorksDepartment, Distt- Raigarh (C.G.) 5. Sub DivisionalOfficer, PublicWorks Department, Tahsil-Sarangarh, Distt-Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AWRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC. ORANY OTHER J11RECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER HIGH COURT OPJUDICATORECHHAmSGARH: BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH ; HON'BLE SHRI SATISH K. AONIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITIONNO. 22§S^OF2006 Petitioner ' : Dashrafh Lal Kodaku yersus Respondents ; State of Chhatdsgarh and othcrs If ji> a. Bablu Present : Shri Sameer Bchar, couasel for the petitioncr. Shri A.S. Kachliawaha, Govemment Advocate for the respondents/State. ORAL ORDER (4*>> May, 2006) 1. Leamed cottasel for £he petitioner subinits fhat thc petftioner was employed as Gaagman ia the year 1978 ia the office ofthe PubUc Works Department, Tahsil Saraagarh, District Raigarh. It is not clcar as to whether fhe petitioncr was appointed pursuant to open iavitation ofthe applications and by selection ainongst the similariy situated persons. 2. According to leamed counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has worked for inore fhan 25 years of service. Learaed counsel for the petitioner further submits that the Madhya Pradesh Gangniaa Service Rule 1996 coine iato force fTom 1.1.1996 and as per Rule, the petitioner is entitled to regularization. 3. At this sta^e, leamed couasel for the petitioner submits that fhe petitfoner may be aUowed to inake a represeatation before the concemed authorities to consider tus case, in accordance with the provisions of law, to which learaed couasel appearing for the respondents has ao objection. A-. 4. The petition is accordingty disposed of with,above liberty to / make a representation, ifany. No order as to costs^ Sd/- SatishKAgnihotn Judge