IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 232 OF 2004 Suo Moto .. Petitioner versus Mrs.Harjit K. Bedi & ors. .. Respondents ... CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 17th October 2006 DATED : 17th October 2006 DATED : 17th October 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Perused the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court on 6th April 2004 in Writ Petition no.221 of 2004. In paragraph no.4 of the order, this Court has noted that the averments made in the Writ Petition are prima facie contemptuous and have the effect of scandalising the court. 2. The contempt alleged would fall under the definition of "Criminal Contempt" and not "Civil Contempt". In the circumstances, matter is required to be placed before a Division Bench. Hence, matter be placed before the appropriate Division Bench. (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J)