IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Delay Condonation Application No. 8272 of 2010 In Writ Petition (S/B) No. 248 of 2005 Radey Shyam Agarwal ….…… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and another ………. Respondents Mr. V.B.S. Negi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P.Upadhyaya, Addl Chief Standing Counsel (State of Uttarakhand) for the respondents. Date of Judgment: 19.11.2010 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. BARIN GHOSH, C.J. (ORAL) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition itself has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. The application for condonation of delay in filing the counter affidavit is allowed. Accordingly, the counter affidavit be kept with the records. (V.K. Bist, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 19.11.2010 19.11.2010 Amit