IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 254 OF 2008 Nirmal Kumar Bhattacharya …Petitioner. Versus Tehri Hydro Corporation Ltd. and others. ……...Respondents. Present: Mr. Vinay Upadhyay, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 4. None for respondent nos. 5 and 6. Date of Decision : 29.7.2010 Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that the instant Writ Petition cannot be pursued without an effective amendment thereof. He further points out that he has been repeatedly contacting the petitioner so as to amend the Writ Petition, however, the petitioner has stopped responding to him. He, therefore, states that he has no further instructions to prosecute this case any further. 2. In view of the above, the instant Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 29.07.2010 Rathour