IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 14922 of 2008 Between: Potluri Veera Raghavulu S/o. Nasaraiah ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Collector, Guntur District. 3 The Joint Collector, Guntur. 4 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Narasaraopet, Guntur District. 5 The Tahsildar, Ipur Mandal, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the inaction on the part of the Second respondent in considering and passing orders in the stay petition filed along with Revision Petition dt. 3-7-2008 filed against the Orders of the Third Respondent in A.C.D. Dis. No. 2/2008-S7 dt. 25-4-2008 as illegal, arbitrary and also violative of principles of natural justice and pass such other orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 14922 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for respondents. The petitioner’s authorization was cancelled by the 4th respondent by an order dated 21-11-2007. Thereagainst the petitioner preferred an appeal to the 3rd respondent. The 3rd respondent by an order dated 25-04-2008 rejected the appeal and confirmed the order of the 4th respondent. Thereagainst the petitioner preferred a revision to the 2nd respondent on 03-07-2008 along with an application for interim relief. Aggrieved that the 2nd respondent has not yet considered and disposed of the revision or atleast the application for interim relief therein, the writ petition is filed. As the revision has been preferred and pending before the 2nd respondent, this Court is not inclined to go into the merits of the petitioner’s grievance regarding the cancellation of his authorization to run the Fair Price Shop at Boggaram village, Ipure mandal, Guntur District. The writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to expeditiously and in any event within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order consider and pass appropriate orders on the application of the petitioner for interim relief in the revision petition preferred by the petitioner against the order of cancellation of his authorization and the rejection of the appeal thereagainst. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 14-07-2008 pvks Nb:- Furnish c.c. as soon as possible. B/o pvks/*