cff \ VSKSSS. IN THE HIGH COURT (OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fSS.lNO. H53. /2010 SSNfil.E PETITIONER: ^CM^ ".'•^y ^'.^^'K^'-'''''' f'G.- ^ ^) <^^' L^' ^•: <r RESPONDENTS VERS3US 1. 2. .3. '4. 5. 6. Vijay Singh Dau S/o Late Shri Lodhan Singh Dau, Aged about 63 years, Occupation Retired from the post of Assistant Teacher from Govemment Primary School Bediharpara, (Kosir), R/o Village Rajapara *-1<)1^-- Palash Road, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Accountant General? Chhattisgarh Pagaria Complex, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) The Commissioner, Public Instructions Directorate Chhattisgarh Raipiir, District Raipur (C.G.) The Joint Director Treasury, Account and Pension Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) The District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) The Principal Govemment Higher Secondary School, Kosir, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITIOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF _THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF tMANDAMUS CERTIQRARY QR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRFT pETmoN (S) No. 1 152 of 2010 PETITIONER : Viiay Singh Dau. RESPQNDENTS VERSUS : State (rf ChhatB^ath & Others. Present Anrit Writ Petilion Under Article 226 Of Tlie Constituflon OfJrriB SB: Hon'Ue Shri Sadsh K. AgnihoW. J. Shri Anil Mairya, Advocate forthe petitkxier. Shri M.P.S.Bhatla, Dy. G.A. for the Slate/respondent No. 1, 31&6. ORAL ORDB^ (Passed on 18*' day of March, 2010) Witt the consent cf teamed counsel appearing for the paites, the matteris ^, heard flnally. 1. L^med counsel aypeaimQ for the p^iUoner submils at the case, bdrtg paym^itof retiral bweflts mattBr, may be r^erredto ttie pendoh commMBe.lj 2. This Court, In the natter of W.P. No. 4642W04 iB^aSi^Msid^ v. The Slate of CtihaWsgarii & OAe^ and tdher connecteci mattais, (iljreaBd^fce ; Committee to conader the matter of teBral dues as ttie disputed questun rt' facts were involved. The Committee was cpnstttut®d.by ttie .afate . Govemment, pureuant to ttie order dated 19.06^006 passedtn_W,P,_N&.;_: 1961^0)6 (Smt l^a Bai Chandialfar Vs. Siate GovemmwitaiKlotti ^w& order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. hto. 105 of 200SJSte^,rf._ Chhatllsgaiti S CMws v. Ba^i^tiMwKla/aiv/aimllse^.Jtus.WlssieSSan^ squarely covered by the juc^ment and onter dated 31" of ^iua(K,_20 passed in W.P. ^k^. 4642/2004 fi&^aaft AfanaW (a<iws$ as submitted tojf leamed counset appearing fbr the parties. 3. With the consent of the paifles, ttiis petltton is aecoidir^ty disposgd of in tt». , same tBrms i.e. the office of the Advocate Geneial is difectBd to~s«KlWe case to the Commlttee, twthin a period rt 15 daysfrom jiie (tetBtf recaBt^a^ copy of the pefltion fiom the petiUoner aml thte ordw. TtwieaUBr, ttie Committee shall issue notiee to the peBtoner and ttie pfflcets eoncemed, J within a lurther period QS 15 (fays. The CominiUeeshall cotShter^and paS" _ order, in accoidance wlth law, after affoiding proper oppQrtunlty of heaiing ts the prtiUDner. Tfte p^tttoner and the rfficers concerned mayfite aijdtttsr^!. : documents, if necessary. The entlre ®teroise,indtxBng paymant iof ftf^ ^ dues, if any, to the petittonsr be comfd^ed wlthin a pertodfrtfour monttis' ' from the date of teoeiptof a copy of this oider. 4. The p^tttoner shall suppty extra copy of the pettfcn to fte learn«lcounsel;.- ai Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge