HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR WRIT PETITION NO. 8388 OF 2010 Between: Smt. D. K. vasantha Kumari, W/o Daniel aged about 47 years ………….Petitioner AND The District Collector, Social Welfare, Karimnagar, karimnagar District and four others ………….Respondents ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice K.G. SHANKAR) The Writ Petitioner challenges the order of the Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No. 519 of 2006 with M.A.No. 2986 of 2007. The applicant was initially appointed as Grade II Matron on 19.7.1984 and her services were regularized from the same date. She subsequently passed the requisite examinations in 1987, 1985 and 1999 respectively. Although it is the claim of the Writ Petitioner that she was eligible and qualified to be appointed for the post of Matron Grade-I, the respondents have not promoted her to the said post. Instead one Smt. M. Aruna Devi was promoted as Grade-I Matron with effect from 28.12.1989. The grouse of the writ petitioner is that although Smt. M. Aruna Devi was otherwise senior, she did not pass the requisite examination for becoming eligible to be appointed as Matron Grade I. It is the claim of the petitioner that Smt. M. Aruna Devi was not eligible for promotion as Grade I Matron by 28.12.1989. When the writ petitioner moved the administrative Tribunal, the Tribunal passed an order on 22.9.2006 directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner for her promotion with effect from 28.12.2009. The petitioner subsequently filed M.A No. 2986 of 2007 seeking a direction to the respondents to consider her promotion for Warden Grade-I/Matron Grade I. The Tribunal recorded the facts of the present case and the grouse of the writ petitioner. However, after recording the claim of the writ petitioner on the contention of the respondents, the Tribunal passed orders holding that in view of the facts and circumstances, the writ petitioner has not made out a case. As rightly submitted by the learned Senior Counsel Sri Gangaiah Naidu, appearing for the writ petitioner, the Tribunal has not assigned any reasons and has not adjudicated the claim of the writ petitioner to the effect that she is entitled for promotion with effect from 28.12.1989 since she has passed the departmental tests earlier. It is for the Tribunal to assign reasons for reaching a conclusion that the petitioner is not entitled to the promotion to the post of Matron Grade I. In view of non-speaking orders of the Tribunal, the impugned order suffers from illegality and is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned order of the Administrative Tribunal is quashed and the matter is remanded. The Tribunal is directed to consider the case of the writ petitioner afresh and dispose of the same on merits. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J _____________________ K.G. SHANKAR, J DATE: 14.02.2011 KA ... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. 2 CD copies.