IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO : 467 of 2010 (Criminal Revision case under Section:_______ against the Judgement in NO : dated ______ on the file of the Court of the to set aside the order granting Inteim Maintenance of Rs. 2,500/- vide M.P. No. 381 / 2009 in M.C. No. 87 / 2009 dated 04-02-2010 passed by the Hon'ble Addl. M.S.J. for the Trial of JHCBBC cum Addl. Addl. Family Court cum XXIII Additional Chief Judge, Nampally, Hyderabad as the same is excess and arbitrary.,preferred against the order in MC 87 2009 dated 04/02/2010 on the file of the Court of the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge For Trail of Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Case-Cum-Addl,. Family Court-Cum-XXIII Additional. Chief Judge,CCC,Hyderabad) Between: Mohd. Moizuddin S/o. Late Mohd. Yousuffuddin R/o. H.No. 10-4-198/2, Nr. Raza Masjid, Nasarpura Street, Siddipet, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Smt. Zakiya Begum W/o. Mohd. Moizuddin, D/o. Mohammed Abdul Salam R/o. 19-3-294/5, Bibi Ka Chasma Road, Vattepally, Hyderabad. 2 The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.K.SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following : PSR, J. Crl.R.C.No. 467 of 2010 O r d e r: This revision is filed challenging the order passed by the learned Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the trial of J.H.C.B.B.C.-cum- Addl. Family Court-cum-XXIII Additional Chief Judge, Nampally, Hyderabad in M.P.No.381 of 2009 in M.C.No. 87 of 2009, under which the first respondent was granted interim maintenance @ Rs.2,500-00 per month. 2. As contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner, in the impugned order, there is no discussion with regard to the income of the revision petitioner, while fixing the quantum of interim maintenance. 3. Now, issuing notice, summoning the first respondent-wife and her appearance in this revision may not be necessary, as it would not in any way be helpful to her, as she would be forced to spend time and money in that regard. Instead, the present revision is disposed of, at the admission stage, itself, directing the revision petitioner to pay interim maintenance to the first respondent-wife @ Rs.2,000-00 (Rs. Two thousand only) per month, instead of Rs.2,500-00 as ordered by the court below. No costs. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. Dated:09—03—2010. *BVS