IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45044 of 2010 RAM UDAY SINGH, S/o Late Shekho Singh. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 09.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 448, 384, 307, 326/34 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 03.02.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 2452 of 2010 since there was material against him that he meted out threats earlier for payment of rangdari and had supplied arms to the co-accused. Considering the serious nature of allegations, I am not inclined to review the said order. The application is dismissed. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it positively within a period of nine months in view of the serious nature of the offence. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)