IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30187 of 2010 1. NAULASO DEVI W/O SHYAM NANDAN SINGH R/O VILLAGE- KINJAR, DISTRICT- ARWAL 2. SANGITA DEVI, W/O SANJAY KUMAR, R/O RAILWAY QTR. NO. 78/2, NOAMUNDI STATION, P.S.- NOAMUNDI, DISTRTICT- WEST SINGHBHUM, JHARKHAND 3. KUM KUM DEVI, W/O GURUDAYAL SINGH, R/O VILLAGE- KARPI DIH, P.S.- ARWAL Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SHRI SATYENDRA KUMAR S/O LATO YADAV R/O VILLAGE- NEW RAMPUR, DEVI ASTHAN, P.S.- SULTANGANJ, DISTRICT- PATNA ----------- 2. 01.03.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 17.7.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge IInd, Jehanabad in Sessions Trial No. 159 of 2010/230 of 2008, by which an application under Section 227 Cr. P.C has been rejected. It has been submitted that initially only the husband and other co-accused persons were charge sheeted and despite repeated directions to the Investigating Officer to submit a final report with regard to the petitioners as a mistake of fact subsequently charge sheet was submitted on the very same materials. On going through the order impugned, I find that there were incriminating statements recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. of some witnesses against the petitioners. In view of such, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter, the application is dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )