IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 01 of 2004 1. Lal Singh S/o Ram Chandra 2. Smt. Leela W/o Lal Singh 3. Ravindra S/o Lal Singh 4. Smt. Geeta W/o Savindra …..…Applicants Vs. 1. State of Uttaranchal 2. Surendra Kumar S/o Man Raj 3. Smt. Poonam W/o Sri Virendra Singh ...…Oppostite Parties Hon’ble P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Heard Bipin Mohan Pingal learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Lokendra Dobhal learned counsel for the respondent no.2-3. The petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ‘Code’) has been preferred for quashing of the chargesheet in case crime No. 169 of 2002 under Section 498A & 323 I.P.C. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Manglaur District Haridwar. From the perusal of the chargesheet, it is clear that the charges framed by the Magistrate concerned was based on cogent and relevant material found against the applicants. Therefore, it cannot be said to be bias of the process of law within the meaning of Section 482 of the Code. The petition, therefore, being devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed. Dated 16.6.2004 (P.C. Verma, A.C.J.) Rawat