IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2009 / 27TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 11158 of 2009(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ 1. KUTTICHAN, S/O.THOMAS, KAITHAKULATH, PUZHITHODE, P.O.PERUVANNAMUZHI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. THOMAS, S/O.MATHAI, KAITHAKULATH, PUZHITHODE, P.O.PERUVANNAMUZHI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHARAM.P RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. KOYILANDY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD., NO.D.2020, P.O.BALUSSERI, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KOZHIKODE. 3. SPECIAL SALE OFFICER, KOYILANDY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD.NO.D2020, P.O.BALUSSERI. ADV. SRI.B.V.JOY SANKER FOR R1 GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 11158 OF 2009 (L) ===================== Dated this the 17th day of June, 2009 J U D G M E N T The main contention raised by the counsel for the petitioners is regarding the accuracy of the amount which is sought to be realised as per Ext.P3. Petitioners submit that the amount demanded in Ext.P3 is Rs.10,94,610/-, while as per Ext.P2 award, the amount due as on 30/6/08 was only Rs.3,21,085/-. It is pointing out this disparity, this writ petition is filed. 2. Although this Court by order dated 03/04/2009 granted a stay on condition that the petitioners remit Rs.4 lakhs, this order has not been complied with. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Bank points out that the loan was taken way back in 1992 and that the amount demanded in Ext.P3 represents principal as well as interest. 4. Be that as it may, if according to the petitioners, the amount claimed is inaccurate, it is for the petitioners to raise the objection before the respondents concerned. It is directed that in WPC 11158/09 :2 : case any such application is made, that will be duly adverted to. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp