IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18825 of 2008 RAM CHANDRA MAHTON Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5 30.7.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The Court had occasion to call for the case diary to verify the antecedent of the petitioner. From the case diary it emerges that the petitioner is an accused in at least two other cases which are Teghra P. S. Case No. 1 of 2005 and Teghra P.S. Case No. 35 of 2006. The present case is of 2007. Even in other two cases there are serious allegations against the petitioner. From the materials on record as well as the allegations in the present case granting bail to the petitioner would only mean that the Court shall facilitate perpetuation of illegal activities detrimental to the interest of society as well as law and order. In the given facts, therefore, the Court is not inclined to extend the benefit of enlarging the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail is rejected. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)