1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition NO. 3971/2010 Sukhadeo R. Katkar Vs. Satish U. Rekawar and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. R. A. Gupte, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM: B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 30TH AUGUST, 2010. Heard Advocate Gupte for the petitioner. At the judgment stage, prayer for possession is sought to be added to the plaint. Advocate Gupte contends that till defendant no.7 filed affidavit and claimed possession and alleged construction on suit plot, the petitioner was under the impression that he is in possession. It is his argument that even today suit plot is vacant. It is apparent that several disputed questions arise and hence, the trial Court has not committed any jurisdictional error or perversity by not allowing such amendment. With liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said order in case circumstances so warranting after the suit is finally decided. Present writ petition is disposed of. JUDGE Ambulkar.