:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO. 725 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 725 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 725 OF 2007 Mr. Hasanmiya Abdul Latif Mulla. ... Appellant. V/s. Mr. Mahamad Kasim Shaikh Husain Mulla. ... Respondent. Mr. Vijay S. Gharat for the Appellant. Mr. D.N. Salvi for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. : A.S. OKA, J. : A.S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 21ST FEBRUARY 2008 : 21ST FEBRUARY 2008 : 21ST FEBRUARY 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . Heard Advocate appearing for the Appellant. The Appellant is the original Defendant in a suit for injunction filed by the Respondent - Plaintiff. The Appellant has pressed into service the plea of adverse possession before the Trial Court as well as in an Appeal preferred by him before the Appellate Court. 2. After having heard the learned Advocate for the Appellant and after perusing the pleadings and notes of evidence, I find that none of the ingredients of plea of adverse possession have been proved by the Appellant. Even if the case made out by the Appellant in his examination in chief is accepted, it cannot be said that the Appellant has acquired the suit property by adverse possession. :2: 3. No case is made out for interference with the concurrent findings of the fact. No substantial question of law arises. 4. The Second Appeal is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE