1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 1011 of 2011 with Stay Application No. 12032 of 2011 Sonu Rastogi S/o Ram Dass R/o Nai Sunhari Ward No. 6, Police station Kichha District Udham Singh Nagar …...................Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand, through Senior Superintendent of Police, District Udham Singh Nagar 2. Biro Devi W/o Chandra Pal R/o Nai Sunhari Ward No. 6, Police station Kichha District Udham Singh Nagar …………..Respondents. Shri M.K.Ray, Advocate, present for the petitioners Shri S.S.Adhikari, A.G.A., present for the State Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. 2 Heard. (2) By means of this writ petition moved under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought quashing of the First Information Report dated 17.03.2011, registered as F.I.R. No. 64 of 2011, relating to offences punishable under section 363 and 366 of I.P.C., Police Station Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar. (3) Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the girl said to have been abducted, was major, and the petitioner got married to her. However, there is no prima facie proof that the girl is major. The allegation in the First Information Report is that the girl was minor and student of class X. (4) Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners, and learned counsel for the state, and after going through the papers on record, in the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is not inclined to interfere 3 with the investigation of the case. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that if the petitioner Sonu Rastogi surrender before the court concerned, his bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay. (Stay Application No. 12032 of 2011, stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt.18.11.2011 NP