1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION (57) CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 168 OF 2005 SUMMONS NO. 168 OF 2005 SUMMONS NO. 168 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO. 88 OF 2005 Aditya R. Parikh ... Plaintiff Vs. S.J. Surve and Ors. ... Defendant Ms. Mili Thakkar i/by Gordhandas & Fozdar for Applicants. Mr. Ashish Kamath i/by V.M. Mahashabde for Defendant No. 1. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. DATED DATED DATED : JULY 12, 2005 : JULY 12, 2005 : JULY 12, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard counsel for the parties. The amendment proposed is in the nature of bringing subsequent events on record; and if the same is allowed to be brought on records, no prejudice will be caused to the other side. Besides, no reply is filed by the other side asserting that the proposed amendment is not bona fide. Taking over all view of the matter, in the interest of justice, Chamber summons is made absolute in terms of Prayer Clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within four weeks from today. Interim protection granted during the pendency of this chamber summons will continue for the period of four weeks to enable the applicant to take 2 recourse to appropriate remedy as may be available in the matter. (A.M. (A.M. (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.) KHANWILKAR,J.) KHANWILKAR,J.)