IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-3409 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.02.2011 Pawan Kumar and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Vivek Khatri, Advocate for the petitioners 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in a case FIR No. 292 dated 19.11.2009 under Sections 363, 366-A, 376(2)(g), 120-B IPC and Section 3 of SC & ST Act registered at Police Station Julana, District Jind. Record reveals that prosecutrix while appearing as PW-1 in the witness box has identified the present petitioners as two persons out of four who have raped her. Considering the statement on oath of the prosecutrix, identifying the accused-petitioners in the Court, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Dismissed. (ALOK SINGH) 28.02.2011 JUDGE reena