IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH OCTOBER 2009 / 15TH ASWINA 1931 RP.No. 955 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WA.2011/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT ------------------------------- M/S.HCL COMNET LTD., 806,SIDHARTH,96,NEHRU PLACE,NEW DELHI-19- REP.BY ITS DEPUTY MANAGER SRI.SREERANJ E.S. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN SRI.K.S.SAJEEV KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX INSPECTOR, COMMERCIAL TAX CHECK POST, MUTHANGA-WAYNAD DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,WAYNAD. BY G.P. SRI. MOHAMMED RAFIQ THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & V.K. MOHANAN, JJ. -------------------------------------------- R. P. No. 955 OF 2009 in W. A. No. 2011 of 2009 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of October, 2009 O R D E R Ramachandran Nair, J. Review Petition has become infructuous because order pursuant to the judgment is already issued, copy of which is served on the Review Petitioner. R.P. is therefore closed as infructuous, leaving open to the review petitioner to seek remedies against penalty order. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge. (V.K. MOHANAN) Judge. kk 2