ORAL onusn (Passed on 16'“ day owune, zoos) With consent of learned counsel appearing for the panies, the matter is heard finally. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were appointed as Aseistan; Teachers in 1974, 1976 and 1975 on a fixed pay scale of Rs.1OOI- for a period of two years. After completion of two yeais probation, the petitioners were granted reguiar pay scaie. He further submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scaie with effect from the date of initial appointment or after oompietion of probation period. 3) The issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunai, Jabaipur in O.A.No.2745l89 ( Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs tate of MP. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated S teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment The matter was taken up to the Hon‘bie Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to reguiar pay scale from date of initial appointment. 4) ln viewof the above stated submissions made by learned counset fm' the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms ie., the petitioners are granted liberty to make a representation, if so advised, to consider the petitioners’ case, if they stand on the same footings as per order dated 24-8—1992 by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, in O.A.No. 2745 of 89 ~ (Madhukant Yadu (supra) and subsequently confirmed by order dated 3-1-1994 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93 and grant relief acoordingiy. 5) in view of foregoing, the petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. i Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Raju