%J ^. ^^ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. ...?a.Z./200-2- PETITIONER 1 ^ Dr. Sanjay Kumar Malik S/o Subash Chandra Malik Aged about 35 years R/o Champur Bazar Tah. Pandariya Distt. Kawardha Shri Pi^dfc^ Kumar Malik S/o Dherandra Nath Malik Aged about 45 years R/o S. Lohara, Distt. Kawardha. Shri Gunjan Kumar Biswas S/o Mohan Ch. Biswas Agedabout 37 years R/o Gandhi, Distt. Rejnandgoan. Shri Biudut Kumar Malik S/o Dharandronath Malik Aged about 36 years R/o Vill. Pathariya, Distt. Bilaspur Dr. Ahafiz Mohamad S/o Abdul Mazid R/o Maungeli Distt. Bilaspur Bisnu Prasad Dabagan S/o Sukhla Sukhlal Dabagaon Aged about 35years R/o Vill. Manikpur Rajnandgoan. VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Health & Family Walfare, D.K. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) State Of M.P. Through the Secretary, Department of Health & Family Walfare, Bhawan Bhopal (M.P.) The M.P. Board of Ayurvedic and Unani System of Medicine and Naturopathy, Bhopal (M.P.), Through the Registrar, Shyamla Hills, Bhopal (M.P.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA L.,^- ^^ XI-HC-22 3?r^i^T 1^I^3?1§^ '^HT^'wln "\^.. "S^ ^IT^T^R, "g^lWT^, ^ITCTy • S&-h)^^)^_ "V% 2QQ STI^T i'^^R ^ft^ 22.3.2002 '^ra(d4)fffw^ ^ ^st Tf^^K ^^f^H^ii^? Petitioners by Shri Man^j Paranjpe, Advocate. State by Shri P.S.Koshyt, Govt. Advocate. Heard. Leamed counsel for th^ petitioner submits that in the simUar petition i.e. W.P.yo.558/2001 this Court has passed the order on 24.4.20)0 l.He subinits that sirailar order may be passed. Shri Manoj Paranjpe s would be satisfied if the < respondents at least to issue petitioners so that the petitio^iers have a chance to fill the application form for enrol^nent and the Competent Authority may examine on m4 on the basis that the writl qualified to be enrolled a^ |rit. This submission is made petitioners are, otherwise, ^ Vaidya under the M.P. Ayurvedic Unani Tatha Pi|akratik Chikitsa Vyavsayi Adhiniyam, 1970. Shri P.S.Koshy,leamed submits that he should be s|Uowed some time to jebtain instructions. I am of the view of direction to be issued t( [ibmits that the petitioners lirection is issued to the application form to the writ Qovt. Advocate for the State ttiat for the limited purpose the Competent Authority atleast to issue ttie appl|cation forms, no further instructions should be recjuired though Shri Koshy submitted that fhere must be some reason why Kl ^ XI-HC-22 ^n^r^r f<^i<=h ^i^r ^HW^ritpr -Tt^tP*^ ^ ^\. ^ ^? -qHH^ ^i^4f<o, f^<ni^li< 3^?T ^ra? ^SNdl %~^ri^*'^^^^^^^^^^^^^"^^^ ^ 20° •NF^T" 3^T ^RIIScR ";R^T tlhis Certiflcate have been denied to the writ| whether the fact of issuance date can be examined by th^ forms are issued to him and fl by fhe writ petitioners. I say writ petitioners though date, exaininations had been | date and petitioners had pas| 4.11.89. AU these aspects, in my Competent Authority at the result, this petition is dispos^ the petitioner by given requi^ the sanie be examuied on| Authority, keeping in view High Court in W.P.No. 287/| The petitioners should enclosj< the fonn while submitting Certtfied copy as p^r Riiles. <=hS^id<liiT1 TTP:T^ff 4 fec3t ir'l'^K '^37f^F[3TI^[ petitioner. It appears as to (frf the Certificate after cut off Competent Authority after the saine are duly submitted because according to the was issued after cut off |completed before the cut off >^ed the examinations before |view can be examined by the tfrme of consideration. In ttie i^d ofwith the direction that ^ite form for enrohnent and merit by the Competent th^ judgment rendered by M.P. 11990 decided on 6.5.1997. a copy of that order with the| fonns for enrohnent. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [Tft^ y^ <^