IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P NO. 1529 OF 2009 DECIDED ON : 30.01.2009 The Ludhiana Improvement Trust ...Petitioner versus National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT Present : Mr. A. K. Chopra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashish Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioner. SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) In this Civil Writ Petition, the petitioner-Improvement Trust seeks quashing of the order dated May 23, 2007 (Annexure P-6) passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab, as well as, order dated 02.04.2008 (Annexure P-8) passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi. During the course of hearing, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner-Improvement Trust submits that the facts of the present case are totally distinguishable from the facts in Shakuntla Devi's case wherein the order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission was upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Various contentions have also been raised to distinguish the present case from Shakuntla Devi's case. C.W.P NO. 1529 OF 2009 -2- Learned counsel further submits that since the counsel on behalf of the petitioner-Trust has inadvertently made a concession that he had nothing further to say in view of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Shakuntla Devi's case, the petitioner-Trust may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for recall/modification of the order dated 02.04.2008 (Annexure P-8). As prayed for, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner-Trust to approach the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for recall/modification of the order dated 02.04.2008 and/or seek interim relief. Copy of this order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. JANUARY 30, 2009 (SURYA KANT) shalini JUDGE