CRLR 1/2009 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Mr. SK Shandilya, Advocate for the revisionist. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. The present revision was filed for enhancement of sentence awarded by the trial court to respondent no. 2. Learned Counsel for the revisionist stated that the parties have entered into compromise and now he does not want to press the present revision. Even otherwise, on perusal I do not find any irregularity or illegality in the impugned judgment and order dated 28.11.2008 passed by the Ist Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar in Complaint Case No. 610/2007, Vikkin Kapoor v. Ravi Saxena under Section 138 of NI Act. Hence, present revision is dismissed. (D.V., J.) 20.7.2010 Prabodh