AB 1560/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. MERUNO Heard Mr. H. K. Mahanta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in AB 1560 /2011 and Mr. D. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner in AB 1898/2011. Also heard Mr. B.S. Sinha, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam. Both these anticipatory bail applications are taken up together because it perta in to the same FIR and CD maintained by the Investigating Agency. On 24.6.11 this Court after hearing the parties was pleased to direct the learne d Addl. P.P. to receive instruction with regards to the report regarding the ent ry of the amount in the cashbook of DRDA for which the FIR has been filed. The l earned P.P. has produced the case diary as well as the records maintained by the concerned office. The records clearly reveal that due to oversight the entry wa s not made. However on proper scrutiny and verification it was found that the pr oject has been duly executed and the funds have been utilized in proper method a nd the project has already been completed. Considering this view of the matter, this Court considers it to be a fit case w here the provision of 438 CrPC can be given to the petitioners in both the bail applications. Accordingly the interim bail passed on 8.6.11 in B.A. No. 1560/11 and the interim bail passed on 29.6.11 in AB 1898/11 are made absolute under the same terms and conditions. With the above direction, these two bail applications AB 1560/2011 and AB 1898/2 011 stand disposed.