1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.4850 OF 2008 PETITION NO.4850 OF 2008 PETITION NO.4850 OF 2008 Bhagwan Laxman Gurao ... Petitioner Vs. Ganesh Mango Gro. Co-op. Soc. ... Respondent Ltd., Katta Mr. Milind Parab, Advocate for the Petitioner. None for respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATE DATE DATE : 8TH JULY, 2008 : 8TH JULY, 2008 : 8TH JULY, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. :- :- :- 1. The reasons recorded by the Court below in Paragraph 9 and 10 of the impugned judgment being a possible view; and moreso on the finding that the petitioner had acquired knowledge about the judgment almost four years back and no explanation is forthcoming for not taking recourse to the remedy permissible by law for such a long time, no interference is warranted in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Petition dismissed. ( A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.) A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.) A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)