IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37827 of 2009 SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.10.2009 Heard. As may appear from the F.I.R. and the rejection order, the petitioner is said to be in possession of a theft property. The inference of the property being obtained in theft is deduced from the confessional statement of a co-accused. The plea of the petitioner is that he did not had any knowledge about it and that it was in possession, in fact, of accused Lalan Yadav who had parked the vehicle at the place of occurrence and the petitioner was only onlooker standing by the side of the vehicle. The petitioner is in custody since 25.7.2009 and does not bear any criminal antecedent. Let the petitioner, namely, Sushil Kumar Singh be directed to be released from custody on his furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2 the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, in Jaynagar P.S.Cse No. 137 of 2009. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)