1 wp 3817.2009.sxw srk IN THE HIGH COUT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3817 OF 2009 M/s J.M. Constructions .. Petitioner vs Mrs. Amaz Romolo Francorsi & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. G.S. Godbole i/b Manjiri S. Parasnis for the Petitioner. Mr. R.M. Haridas, Advocate for the Respondents No.1 & 2. .. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J DATE: 4th September, 2009. P.C. 1 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1 and 2. 2 The learned counsel appearing for the first and second respondents on instructions states that the first respondent will hand over relevant documents showing her income to the advocate on record for the plaintiff appearing before the trial court. He states that document will be handed over to the said advocate within a period of two weeks from today. He further states that the first respondent has no objection if the advocate for the plaintiff produces the 2 wp 3817.2009.sxw said documents before the trial court. He states that if said documents are produced by the petitioner before the trial court, the first respondent will have no objection for exhibiting the said documents and for reading the same in evidence. 3 The statements made by the learned counsel for the first respondent on instructions are accepted. In view of these statements, at this stage, it is not necessary to interfere with the impugned order. The petition is disposed of in view of the statement by keeping all the contentions open. The pending suit shall be disposed of as expeditiously as possible and preferably by the end of January, 2010. Judge.