IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4792 of 2010 1. DINESHWAR SAHNI,son of Bashudev Sahni 2. Munai Sahni,son of Bashudev Sahni 3. Bindeshwar Sahni,son of Bashudev Sahni 4. Ranjeet Sahni,son of Munna Sahni 5. Basudev Sahni,son of Late Bhujan Sahni 6. Shambhu Sahni,son of Dineshwar Sahni All resident of village of Gosai Tola,P.S.-Rajnagar,District-Madhubani. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the Petitioners :Ms.Namrata Mishra, Advocate. For the State :Mr.Rajendra Singh Shastry,Addl.P.P. ----------- 02/ 08-04-2010 It is stated by Ms. Namrata Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, that during the pendency of this application petitioner no.2, Munai Sahni, has been apprehended by the police and, therefore, his petition for anticipatory bail has become infructuous. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is dismissed as infructuous. Heard the parties. Petitioners no.1 and 3 to 6 apprehend their arrest in connection with C.R.Case NBo.1517/2008, corresponding to Trial No.2537/2009, in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323/379/384 of the Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution case, petitioners and other accused persons are alleged to have surrounded the complainant and by putting him under the fear of death, obtained his L.I.T. on some plain papers and snatched rupees seven hundred from his pocket as also a bicycle. 2 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that both sides are agnates and land dispute is going on between the parties. Proceeding under Section 144 Cr.P.C. was also going on between them. Therefore, the present case has been lodged because of previous land dispute. Learned counsel for the State has also not disputed the aforesaid position. In that view of the matter, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today in the above noted case, the above named petitioners no.1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 except petitioner no.2 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)