ladda IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6612 OF 2011. K.H.Rangnath and others ....Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents. Mr Prosper D'souza for the petitioners. Mr R.M.Patne, A.G.P. For respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr Prakash Ambekar for Respondent No.3. Ms Manjusha Kuntekar for Respondent No.5. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 3rdOctober, 2011. P.C.: 1. Mr D'souza makes a statement that he has not asked for any relief against respondent Nos. 5 to 8 and they are the formal parties. Statement is accepted. 2. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. ladda 3. By consent of learned counsel for the respective parties, the petition is disposed of by passing the following order. ORDER. (a) Respondent No.4 – Deputy Charity Commissioner, Mumbai Region, Mumbai is directed to hear and decide CR No. 3213 of 2007 filed by the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within the period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. (b) The learned Deputy Charity Commissioner, while disposing of the said change report, will take into consideration the objections filed by respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to the said change report. He will also grant audience to respondent Nos. 2 and 3, however, these respondents are not entitled to cross-examine the reporting Trustee. (c) It is expressly made clear that I have not gone into the merits of the case and all rights and contentions are kept open to be agitated before the Deputy Charity Commissioner by the respective parties. Order accordingly. (RANJIT MORE, J.)