WP(C) 5927/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA.. Heard Mr. J. Payeng, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Ms R. Deka, learned Standing Counsel, P.W.D. By means of this review application, the petitioners have prayed for review of t he order dated 1.6.2010, by which the writ petition being WP(C) No.5927/2007 was disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of promoti on of the petitioners strictly in terms of the Technical Services Rules, 1991. T he petitioners, although are not opposed to the said direction, but have prayed for review of that part of the observation, by which it has been stated in the o rder that the petitioners will be entitled to count 7 (seven) years of service t owards earning eligibility from the date of bringing them to regular establishme nt in 2005. If the draft Rules of 1991 are applicable to the case of the petiti oners, then as per Rule 9 (i) and (ii) of the Rules, the petitioners are entitle d to get consideration for promotion upon rendering minimum of 8 (eight) years o f continuous service in the trade. This particular provision does not speak of c ounting of the said service from the date of regular appointment, but speaks of 8 (eight) years of continuous service in the trade. Since the direction contained in the said order dated 1.6.2010 is to consider th e case of the petitioners as per the draft Rules, 1991, their weightage will hav e to be considered in terms of Rule 9 (i) and (ii) of the draft Rules. Ms R. Deka, learned Standing Counsel, P.W.D. submits that the draft Rules are be ing amended and according to such amendment, 8 (eight) years of continuous servi ce will be counted from the date of bringing the incumbents to regular establish ment. However, till such time the amendments are not incorporated, the draft Rul es, as it stand, will have to be followed. In view of the above, this review petition is disposed of clarifying tha t while applying the draft Rules of 1991 to the case of the petitioners, the res pondents may also take into account Rule 9 (i) and (ii) of the draft Rules towar ds counting eligibility of the petitioners for promotion.