..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.337 OF 2007 1. M/s.Four Colour Printers Ltd., & 2. Shri Madhusudan Ramnivas Agarwal. ..Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Sandeep R. Karnik, Adv. i/b. Abad H.H. Ponda, Adv. for the applicants. Mr.Subodh Desai, Adv. for respondent No.2. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 29th August, 2008. DATED : 29th August, 2008. DATED : 29th August, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Petitioners-orig.accused Nos.1 & 3 and the learned Advocate for the respondent No.2-orig.complainant. 2. By judgment and order dated 15th July, 2005 the petitioners were convicted in Case No.1423/S/2002 by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 7th Court, Dadar, Mumbai. By the said judgment and order, the petitioners were convicted under Section 138 of N.I. Act. The learned Magistrate directed each of the petitioners to pay compensation of Rs.2 lakhs to the complainant, in default, petitioner No.2 shall to ..(2).. suffer S.I. for three months. The petitioners challenged the said order before the Sessions Court. Their appeal came to be dismissed. Hence, this Revision. 3. During pendency of this Revision, both the petitioners have deposited an amount of Rs.2 lakh each, i.e. total amount of Rs.4 lakhs, before this Court. The learned Advocate for the complainant states that if the complainant is allowed to withdraw the amount of Rs.4 lakhs which has been deposited by both the petitioners in this Court, the complainant has no objection to the offence being compounded and the petitioners being acquitted. 4. In view of the above statement made by the learned Advocate for the complainant, the offence is compounded. The petitioners are acquitted in the said case. The respondent No.2-orig.complainant is permitted to forthwith withdraw the amount of Rs.4 lakhs deposited before this Court. 5. Criminal Revision Application is disposed of accordingly. ..(3).. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)