IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32793 of 2010 AJAY TANTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 03.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Petitioner is not named in the formal F.I.R. and it has only come in Fardbeyan of the informant that petitioner had taken Rs. 1,50,000/- from informant’s husband on credit and on the alleged date of occurrence informant’s husband went to the house of the petitioner to collect the aforesaid amount but he did not return till night. Subsequently, in course of investigation, one witness has claimed to have seen the petitioner in the company of the deceased prior to the alleged occurrence and on the basis of the aforesaid material, Senior Police Officials found the case true against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, petitioner, namely, Ajay Tanto, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sheosagar P.S. Case No. 149 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )