IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10460 of 2010 CHHOTELAL PRASAD @ MITHUN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 02.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner has been made an accused in a case under sections 395 and 412 of the I.P.C. on the allegation that he and others snatched Rs.5,00,000/- from the Cashier of a bank while he was carrying the same from Allahabad bank main branch to Tikri branch on the gun point. The petitioner submits that he has not been put on T.I.parade, despite his requisition and he has been sought to be implicated in this case on his own confession. The State counsel submits that petitioner’s name has transpired in confession of co-accused, namely, Naushad and even petitioner also made his own confession and Rs. 1 lakh was recovered from his house. He is in custody since 11.11.2009. Prayer for bail of the petitioner is refused. Let the trial be expedited. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)