IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3824 of 2010 UMESH KUMAR PANDEY S/O SHRI RAM CHANDRA PANDEY R/O VILL MARPASIRPAL, P.S.MAJORGANJ, P.O.BASBITTA, DISTT-SITAMARHI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COMMISSIONER -CUM-SECRETARY,(PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ) BIHAR,PATNA 3. THE SECRETARY,RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BIHAR,PATNA 4. THE SECRETARY ,I.C.D.S.,DIRECTORATE WELFARE DEPARTMENT BIHAR,PATNA 5. THE DIRECTOR ,PRIMARY EDUCATION BIHAR,PATNA 6. THE COMMISSIONER TIRHUT DIVISION,MUZAFFARPUR 7. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SITAMARHI 8. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION SITAMARHI 9. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MAHORGANJ,SITAMARHI 10. THE PRESIDENT ,ZILA PARISHAD SITAMARHI 11. THE MUKHIYA ,GRAM PANCHAYAT PACHHORWA PANCHAYAT,MAHORGANJ,SITAMARHI 12. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY,GRAM PANCHAYAT PACHHORWA PANCHAYAT,MAHORGANJ,SITAMARHI ----------- 02. 20.12.2010 Whatever be the background to the litigations which have carried on over the years, the basic fact cannot be overlooked by the Court that the issue was appointment/engagement of the petitioner as a Shiksha Mitra in the year 2003. Since there is no post of Shiksha Mitra on which engagement can be made after 2006, the whole argument being made on behalf of the petitioner is only academic. Submission does not merit any interference in view of the above developments. The writ application is dismissed on that ground alone. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)