THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6563 of 2011 Date:15.03.2011 Between: Reddy Sri Ramachandra Murthy ..... Petitioner AND The Joint Registrar, Visakhapatnam and others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri V.V.N.Narasimham Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2: Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies Counsel for Respondent Nos.3 to 5: -- The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the order dated 18.10.2010 made in Rc.No.3240/2010 B (Comp) of the 1st respondent herein in so far as appointing the 3rd respondent as an Enquiry Officer and order dated 18.11.2010 made in Rc.No.3240/2010 B (Comp) of the 1st respondent to the 3rd respondent and the action of the 3rd respondent herein proceeding beyond the scope of the enquiry as ordered by the 1st respondent as arbitrary, illegal, improper and incorrect and consequently direct the 1st respondent herein to appoint any other Officers in the place of the 3rd and 5th respondents herein and pass such other order or orders…” After arguing the case for some time, Sri V.V.N.Narasimham, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. The request of the learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.8169 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 15th March, 2011 GHN