LPA No. 2155 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No.2155 of 2011 Date of decision 25.11.2011 Rajinder Singh and others . Appellants Versus Guru Nanak Dev University and others .. Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: Mr. RS Bains, Advocate for the appellants 1. To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 2. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? M.M.KUMAR,J. 1. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against interlocutory order dated 18.11.2011 in which the learned Single Judge has issued notice of motion of the writ petition relatable to this appeal. The writ petitioner-appellants have been asked to deposit the fee as demanded by the College within 5 days of the date of the order. Their parents have been asked to appear personally before the Principal of the College to file an undertaking in writing for good behavior of the petitioners. They were to tender apologies for the past incidents with an undertaking for good behavior and conduct in future. The other directions need not be noticed. The only issue raised by the writ petitioner-appellants is that the fee demanded by the College is more than the double and the direction could only be for depositing of fee by the writ petitioner- appellants as per the rules and prospectus. 2. Be that as it may, we are not inclined to entertain the controversy because if any modification of the order dated 18.11.2011 is LPA No. 2155 of 2011 2 required then it should have been sought from the learned Single Judge. Moreover, the impugned order has been passed in the presence of the parties and in any case more than five days time granted by the learned Single Judge has already expired. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal and relegate the writ petitioner-appellants to move appropriate application before the learned Single Judge, if so advised. (M.M.Kumar) Judge (Rajiv Narain Raina) 25.11.2011 Judge okg