IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41493 of 2009 NIRANJAN KUMAR @ MUNNA Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.41557 of 2009 RAMESH PRASAD KARN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 20.11.2009 Heard. Petitioners in both the petitions are not named in the FIR. Petitioners were also not named by the person who was caught at the spot. What transpired during the course of investigation is that the petitioner Ramesh Prasad Karn brought a cell phone set for repair on the shop of petitioner Niranjan and finding that charges for the repair of machine was quite a bit, he expressed the desire to sell the cell phone set and accordingly, the petitioner Niranjan got it sold to a third person. The implication of petitioner Ramesh Prasad Karn is on account of possessing that mobile set but he disputes the EMI number and sim number of the mobile which was given, was put in the cell phone set. The petitioners have not been put on Test Identification parade nor was any thing recovered from their possession. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioners Niranjan Kumar alias Munna and Ramesh Prasad Karn be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000/ (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M. Railways, Samastipur in Samastipur G.R.P. Case no. 51 of 2009. Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)