IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 65 OF 2009 IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 7 OF 2001 OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR ... Applicant Versus SHRI. SUNIL KUMAR A. NAIK AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Kumar Gupta, Official Liquidator. Mr. B. Bandekar, Advocate for Respondent no.1. Coram:- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date:- 31st March, 2011 P.C. Heard, Official Liquidator and learned Counsel appearing for Respondent no.1. Respondent nos. 2 and 3 are duly served but none appears on their behalf. 2. Perused the application. There is no opposition thereto. The prayer made by Official Liquidator to correct the order and decree dated 28.6.2002 by adding to the decree the names of Respondent nos.2 and 3 to the present application is to indicate that it is passed against them and not only against Respondent no.1. 3. From perusal of the order dated 28.6.2002 and particularly issues framed, I am satisfied that this is not a case of any clerical or arithmetical error in the decree which is capable of being corrected by taking recourse to section 152 of C.P.C. 4. Application of the Liquidator is dismissed. 5. Application stands disposed of. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. vn