1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.571 OF 2007 Ashok Lynn Coelho ..Appellant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors ..Respondents Mr.C.K.Pendse, advocate, for appellant Mrs.V.R.Bhosale, A.P.P, for the State CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008 P.C. . This is an appeal preferred against the order dated 24th March, 2007. The appellant herein is the complainant. Pursuant to his complaint the proceedings have been initiated under the M.P.I.D. Act, 1999 and various properties were attached belonging to one Mr.K.B.Party who appears to be absconding. 2. It appears that one RSA builder had taken out an appeal claiming right in the property and the scheme was started by one 2 Mr.Siddharth Sethi. In the mean time, one Mr.K.B.Party is also claiming right in the property. The dispute between RSA builder on the one hand and Mr.K.B.Party on the other appears to have been resolved. According to counsel, a compromise pursis was filed. According to counsel, the decree taken by the Consent is sham and bogus and not binding. In view of the application made by RSA builder, he moved an application for perjury. This application is disposed of by oral order dated 24th March, 2007. 3. In our opinion, the act under which the proceedings have been initiated and the matter is in Supreme Court we really cannot find any fault at this stage in the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. In the mean time, if the Supreme Courts decides the issue it will be open to the appellant to pursue the application moved by him and even otherwise it will be open to the appellant to move independent proceedings. 4. In the above observations, Criminal Appeal is dismissed. 3 (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)