IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH JULY 2011 / 22ND ASHADHA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 5422 of 2011() ----------------------------------------- CRIME NO.559/2011 & 568/2011 OF SOORANADU POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT ------------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED -------------------------------------- ABDUL SALAM SAHIB, "DARUL SALAAM", SOORANADU P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.MOHAN C.MENON RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------------------------------- STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SOORANAD POLICE STATION, KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.PIN- 682 031 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.MANU THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts K.T.SANKARAN, J. --------------------------------- B.A. No.5422 OF 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of July, 2011 ORDER In the Bail Application and the application for anticipatory bail two crime numbers are shown, namely, Crime Nos.559 of 2011 and 568 of 2011 of Sooranadu Police Station. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner confines his relief in respect of Crime No.568 of 2011. 2. The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.568 of 2011 of Sooranadu Police Station. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 406, 420, 323 and 313 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The prosecution case is that the defacto complainant, a divorced woman and the petitioner got acquainted with each other and they fell in love. They started residing together. The defacto complainant became B.A. No.5422 OF 2011 2 pregnant. She was taken to the hospital under the guise of treatment and the accused caused termination of pregnancy without her consent. It is also alleged that on various occasions the accused got `4,90,000/-(Rupees Four lakh Ninety thousand only) and 20 sovereigns of gold from the defacto complainant and he did not repay the amount and redeliver the ornaments. It is alleged that the receipt of the amounts and jewellery was with intent to cheat the defacto complainant. 4. The allegations levelled against the petitioner are serious in nature. If anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, it would adversely affect the proper investigation of the case. The nature in gravity of the offence also demands that anticipatory bail should not be granted to the petitioner. For the aforesaid reasons, the Bail Application is dismissed. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE. cms