IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTAHN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2170 of 2008. Gopal Public Trust, Jaipur Vs. Kaushal Kishore Agarwal. Date Of Order ::: 01/05/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain J. Mr. Suresh Sahni, Counsel for the Petitioner Mr. Pankaj Sharma, advocate, for Mr. Deepak Asopa, Counsel for the respondent BY THE COURT : Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent filed a separate suit in the same matter, which was dismissed, and the regular appeal filed by him was also dismissed on 22.02.2008 when the Appellate Court passed the impugned order Annexure 4 in the present case on the same day. He further submits that some documents were not in his knowledge, which could not be brought on the record, therefore, instead of filing all the documents on record, along with the application for grant of permission to take the additional documents on record, he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh stay application in the trial Court, along with the other documents, which were not placed on the record, while filing the suit. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioner can be granted liberty to file fresh stay application, but a liberty can not be granted to it to file any new documents. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, and after considering the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file another application for temporary injunction in the trial Court, along with other documents, which were not placed on the record, according to law. It will be open for the defendants to oppose the application on all legal grounds. The trial Court will consider the matter a fresh without being influenced by earlier order passed in the matter. There will be no order as to costs. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. ashok/