IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52600 of 2008 SURAJ KUMAR MISHRA @ GAURAB KUMAR @ GOURAB KUMAR MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 19.2.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the motorcycle was not seized from the conscious possession of the petitioner and the police officials are only the seizure list witnesses only to falsely implicate the petitioner but I find no substance at the moment in the submission advanced on behalf of the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected finding the case of motorcycle theft. However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and in case the same is not concluded within a period of three months, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer before the trial court. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI