.....1 4 $mgka mngh ‘@ O ”@\W IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G.) W.P.S. "\5W\ 111 / sh Kar hrma S Lat Yoge um So /O nni e year .. ufc ov. Hhreoryol Rap Diss Bpr . of o rsar Thrcugh Chief Setory Govt ..S. a ecr .. / 1 Sfe f Chhat’igh 0f Chhcmsgarh DK Bhwan Raipur (CG) li/te Secretr Sta f .. Deprem era dmnsro’ron D... wn Ropur .G.) . ndr Scr at .;. artm’r ecrear o tio .K. w ipu (.. . isrct o icer strct iiaspu .G. 5 Coitr . leco Dit Biaur (C.G) istrc isp . WRI E R t CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .Particular of petitioner : As given in the cause titie . I x LT m m“ mm mmmr immwmwum ‘ mmmmmm mmwwmw Wwwmmmmmmwmmmwmmmmmmwmmwwwwwwmwwwwmwwmww @ ( , Ac Kumcr Sharma Agd 42 s UDT Nn Soni/Gf igeScndScho afnur t itasu ( CG) Peiifioner Verses 2. {dr oy te o CG a1m of Gnel Aii1i KS haa i (C 3 Ue eemty Ste of CC Depen of Sty Schot Educan DS. Bhaan Rar CG) (y 4 Dti Educatin Off /, Dii Br (C) T PTmON UNDE ARTCLE 226 227 OF The WRIT PETETION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTI’I‘UTION OF INDIA SB: Hnn’hle Shri Satish K. Aanihotl'i. J. Fresent: Shri H.S‘Ah}uwalia: Advocate for the yetitioner. Sim' P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for ihe Siaie/respondanls. O R B F, R (Passed an 02Wvember, 201 1) Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 15,(_‘17.2011 {Annemre P/l) passed bv the Callector. Bilasgur. whereby, the petitioner, working as Upper Division Teacher at Nutan Sonj Govemment Higler Secondary School, Ratanpur, Block Kola, hae been transferred to Middle School; Chandeli‘ Pathariya, on adnnnistrative grounds. Shri Ahluwalim learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that. the imptlgted transfer order has been passed in violation of the memo dated 03‘Olr1986 and circular dated 18‘02.1986 (Armexure P/6 colly,) as it is clearly provided that if a teacher is posted as N.C.Cl part time officer, he should not be transferred from one institution to another without consulting the concerned Directorate ofN.C.C. There is no dispute on the facts that the petitioner is working as part time NtC.C. oEicer and the impugned transfer order has been passed without consulting the concerned Directorate ofNJCLL w \\‘.\.~\_ HK‘TH COI IRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT RH ,ASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 4541 of2011 PETITIONER Yogesh Kumar Shauna. VERSUS RE$PONDENTS : State ofCILhattisgarh & Others. h) @9 4. Qhn Bhaduri, Eeamed Panel Lawyer aypearing for the State/respondents fairly summit that the impugqed order dated 15,07.2011 does not complv with the requirement of the ahove staied circulars. Thus, the State may be gamed libex1y to pass appropriate order, in administrative exigency and in accordance with law‘, aiter proper consultation with the Directorate of the N‘C‘Co ,3. In View of the above, the impugned order dated 15,072011 (Amnexure P/l) in respect of the petitioner; is quashed. However; liberty is reserved to the State/respondents to pass appropriate order in accordance with law, as aforestated, ifso advised, 6‘ Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed No order asto costs. Sd/—' Satish K. Agnihotri Judge