IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.871 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Mainpal ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: September 28, 2010 __________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.28/2010 Under Sections 147, 323, 325, 326, 504 IOC P.S. Khanpur, District Haridwar ______________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. K.S. Verma, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. GA for the State. As per the prosecution case, a First Information Report was lodged by Subhash on 6.8.2010 at 10:40 AM at P.S. Khanpur alleging therein that the applicant Mainpal and other co-accused persons caused injuries to Subhash and Lal Kamal on 5.8.2010 at 7 PM. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that there is a cross version also and a FIR of the same incident was also lodged by co-accused Mintu Kumar on 6.8.2010 at 11:30 AM against the complainant’s side. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that these are the cross cases and the injuries are on both the parties i.e. on the side of complainant and accused persons and at this stage it cannot be ascertained that which of the party is the aggressor. It is further submitted that except the present applicant-accused, all other co-accused have been granted bail by learned Sessions Judge, Haridwar and the present applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. After considering all the facts and circumstances; on hearing learned counsel for the parties; on perusal of the contents of both the FIRs; injury reports and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Mainpal be released on bail on her executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Haridwar. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 28.9.2010 RG