THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32341 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner claims to be a lessor in respect of a shop owned by Hindupur Municipality at the rate of Rs.1,000/- per month. A notice was issued by the respondents requiring the petitioner to vacate the premises, by treating it as an open site of 10 feet x 12 feet. The petitioner filed O.S.No.254 of 2008 in the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Hindupur. I.A.No.899 of 2008 was filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. After hearing both the parties, the trial Court allowed the I.A., through order, dated 08.05.2009. Thereafter, a final notice, dated 16.12.2010, was issued to the petitioner. It was mentioned that in its order, dated 08.05.2009, passed in I.A.No.899 of 2008, the trial Court observed that the petitioner can be evicted from the site in question in accordance with law and the notice is being given requiring the petitioner to vacate the site. The same is challenged in this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. When the petitioner received a preliminary notice, dated 21.05.2010, he filed O.S.No.254 of 2008 and obtained an order of temporary injunction. Specific mention was made to the notice in the order passed in I.A.No.899 of 2008. The notice impugned in this writ petition is said to be in continuation of the same proceedings. If the petitioner is of the view that the notice is contrary to law or is opposed to the order passed in I.A.No.899 of 2008, he can certainly urge those grounds before the trial Court itself. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the civil Court with necessary application. The respondents shall not take any steps against the petitioner for a period of three weeks from today. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt: 29.01.2011. Note: Issue cc in two days. (B/o) kdl