IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3930 of 2009 JAYA DEVI WIFE OF LATE TETAR PRASAD YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MANHARA, P.O. SIKHASAN, P.S. & DISTRICT- MADHEPURA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER/ASSISTANT ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DIVISION, SAHARSA 5. THE TREASURY OFFICER, MADHEPURA. ----------- 3 04.02.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the Accountant General. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 & 3. It is submitted on behalf of the Accountant General that in view of the claim raised by one minor son of the deceased namely, Indu Bhushan Kumar , the petitioner is not entitled to 100 per cent family pension. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the objection of the Accountant General is not correct, and as such, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Saharsa (respondent no.4). In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating distinctly the unpaid claims including the claim for arrears of 50 per cent of the family pension is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law after making due enquiry expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and admitted dues along with statutory interest could also be paid to the petitioner. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)