IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2010 / 20TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 14193 of 2010(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. PADMAVATHY ,W/O.BANERJI,AGE 27 YEARS, SAKTHIVELILLAM,IRACHIPARA,DEVICOLAM. 2. PHILOMINA CLEMENT,W/O.CLEMENT,AGE 41 YEARS, KURISUMOOTTIL HOUSE, DEVICOLAM. BY ADV. SMT.A.G.ANEETHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY SECRETRY, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS & WILDLIFE SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADDL.R2 THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, MUNNAR, DEVICOLAM P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT (Impleaded as per order dated 20.5.10 in I.A.6215/10) GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 14193 of 2010 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 16.12.09 WITH REGARD TO THE 1ST PETITIONER EXT.P2- COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 16.12.09 WITH REGARD TO THE 2ND PETITIONER EXT.P3- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 19.3.10 EXT.P4- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 16.3.10. (TRUE COPY) P.A TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).14193/2010 -------------------- Dated this the 10th day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT Petitioners claim to be Casual Sweepers working in the Devicolam Range Office and Munnar Divisional Forest Office. According to them, they are working since 2.2.2005. They claim entitlement for regularization of their services on the strength of G.O.(P).No.501/05/Fin. Dated 25.11.2005. 2. In the counter affidavit, respondents have produced materials indicating that the petitioners have been engaged as Casual Sweepers from 2.2.2007 and 2.2.2006 respectively. These dates are indicated in Exts.R2(a) and R2(b) representations made by the petitioners also. In this writ petition, petitioners have also not produced any material to the contrary. In such circumstances if the date of commencement of their services is 2.2.2007 and 2.2.2006, petitioners are ineligible for regularization as ordered in G.O.(P).No.501/05/Fin. Dated 25.11.2005. W.P.(C).14193/10 2 For the reasons stated above, writ petition is only to be dismissed and I do so. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs