e- IN THE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGASH AT BIIASRUR Writ Petition No. s^-^72005 Petitioner /^x~ ^..^> ^^/y^ ^\^ ^f y ^' ^w -/ ^A<"rK V ,^'Sunita Renold, aged about 33 years, daughtei- of Shri Renold Ajik, Shtksha Karmi, Grade II, Re^iderutJ pf willage Tikakala, Tah^H P^ndra Road, Distt. 'Biljg^pur /<^ .^o^ ^c^ '^y VERSUS 1. (thhatiisg^i|h) .<-< ••" '^1- :.,-'~" ^ CY'6^^ ^. ^< ^^R -3. State of CHhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department pf School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Thg Janpad Panchayat GFOn{frela,? j'thrdugh ; Its 'Chief ^Ex^tatftive'Si ' OBicerJ . Distt.' Bil£tspur(©G) || Vinay Kumar Choubey, Ghief Executive Officer - Janpad Panchayat Gourela, Distt. Bilaspur(C.G.) • The Naib Tahsfldar, TahsU Gaurela,.E)istt.,Baaspur (C.G.) WRTT PEHTnONUNE>ERAI'?'iFieiA!!.2^^S'223"lQFTHE CONSTItUTIQNOfeINBlA i 1 01) PARTICULARS OF THE PE'ntTIOiNER ! ., • The detail offhe petitioner is given'in the cause title. 02) PARTICULARS OFTHERESPONDENTS .The Respondents are thfi State and its .authorities an& thefefore they are am.enable'towritjunsdiction. w^3v'wf^': ? { .? tra a?-w ^;^K^^?%?$^-;lt-;^ l^s^iia^y^;^^^^^^ XI-HC-22 sn^rw f^ri'«*;3I^RT ^w^yisd ^^0, 's^t •^i'iiw, o^l^'i?, Rni«y~ 3ll^l ^iach, _ , _ _ ^, 'w^P. 'S2JB 27 ^.00^~ *nWtT!ih*fI^) R<)«A '?n^?r e'wi^PCyt^d Shri Raiesh Pandey, lef Shri Sanjsy S. Agra'ij' No.l/State :• Shri Sadeep Dubey, ooi( r-1eard. This v./rit petition has be(^n flled on 27/09/2005 for the foliowing reliefs: 1) To issuei the Respondent No.; time to the petitioner from the Competent; 2) To issue a the order dated N0.321/B-121/2002-!03 oHa T\w months' time as pr^ order passed by the Naib N0.321/B-121/2002-03 was revisionai Court dismissed thl appe!!ab!e whereas t'ne appeai the petitioner has already cha| forum, and final orders have y order passed by the Nair Ta| orders. Even othei\vise, petlt and that scademic year has pa] only has become infructuous, juncture. Accordingly, it is dism| •=bl'i|(d*ll'f t<|t|dTffte^l'<Ri«i< ^sri^Hsn^T : irned counse! for the petitioner. al. iearned Govt. Advocate for respondent nsel for the respondents No. 2 to 4. writ in the nature of mandamus, v/hereby and 3 be direoted to grant two months |so as to enable her to get caste certificate ^uthorityforfiling the same before them. writ in the nature ofcertiorari for quashing' 9/09/2003, passed in Revenue Case i, by the Respondent No.4. r^yed for has lapsed a long 'oack Adfnittedty, the Tfehsildar dated 19/09,'2003 in Revenue Case tilenged in revision as weil in appeal and i^ revision on the ground that the order is |was dismissed for ^vant of prosecution. When penged the impugned order before the higher [en passed by the higher forum, the impugned ahsiidar dated 19/09/2003 meraed with those foner's appointment was for'the year 2004-05 >a^sed a 'iong back. Therefore, thls petition not D36S but also remained not maintainabls at this -ft. -. — ^ ssed. sd//- V.K.Shrivastava Judge ^ (<^^r)