$§§§$LE Mégs: @ (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Cgw‘ol/ WRIT PETmoN (S) No.ééé£ /2ooe PETITIONER 1 Smt. Sandhya Jha W/o Shri Neeraj Jha Age about 39 years, AssistantTeacher, Govt. G.H.S. School, Nevra, Block - Tilda, Disit. - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ( 1. State Government of Chhattisgarh Through :- Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department & Education gw‘“ D,(‘O?Y Department D K S Bhawan Ralpur (C G ) vi 7"“ , District Education Officer A G. EmAS Raipur (C.G.) n 3. Block Education Officer Tilda, Distt.- Raipur (C‘G.) J 4. Joint Director (Treasury/Accounts), Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF lNDlA Petitioner most humbly submit as under :- M ' #7 , ‘\ XI—HC-78 K EW,'W€W . w‘P.(-g) 290- (”Vac o..o.o.oo¢..o.o.c.o.. mm (W) WW kQ°rtR1EAR mmm %a%ww%m 06.12.2006 Shri Ajay Shrivastava,-learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Aahuja, lea d G.A. forthe Statefrespondent. By this petition under rticies 226/227 of the Constitution of india, the petitioner’seeks a directio to the respondents to pay the increments and seniority on the basis of t e date of her initial appointment in the tight of the decision rendered by the learned State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in Original Applicatio No. 2745f1989 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs“ State of M.P. and o hers) dated 24.8.1992 2. Learned counsel appea ing for the petitioner placed reliance, on the order dated 9m October 2006 assed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No. 547312006 (Rakesh Kumar Sh rma and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and in Writ Petiti n (S) No. 5474/2006 (Jai Nath Bajpai Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ers) and submits that the petitioner is similarly situated, therefore, th similar order may be passed. 3. The case of the petitio er is that she was appointed as Assistant Teacher in the School Educati n Department on probation for a period of two years with the fixed sal However, later on, after completion of two years’ probation, the petitioner was regularized but, she was not given the regular pay scale. Other si ilarly situated teachers moved the State Administrative Tribunal, Jabal ur for regular pay-scale, wherein learned Tribunal vide order dated 24 8.1992 allowed the same. The petitioner made several representations. o accord the same treatment as she is also M,W’, P.T.O. r e h a . mam \ IR XI—HC-78 . (A) fWa é6‘66/200é Wm§&090 ‘O‘O‘OOOO§O"§OOOW‘200 mm (W) WWW WW Emmaf’sam ‘ I %a1%tra11%¥r simiiarly situated, but, the respomdents have not paid any heed. Thus, this petition. 4. ~ Learned counsei for the aetitioner submits that the petitioner may be allowed to make a representation to respondent No.1 to give similar treatment to the petitioner and s me pay-scale which has been sanctioned to other'similarly' situated teach rs on account of the order of the State Administrative Tribunal dated 2 3.1992, to which learned counsel for the respondent/State has no objecti n. 5. Having heard learned co nsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of he case, in the opinion of this Court, the iimited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner appears to be reasonable. Therefore, the petiti ner is allowed to make a representation ' within a period of two weeks fr today to respondent No.1, raising all her grievances and, in turn, re pondent No.1 shall decide the said representation in an objective m nner within a period of 30 days from the V date of receipt of such repres ntation, aner considering all the points raised by the petitioner and taki g-into account the order dated 24.8.1992 passed by the learned State Ad inistrative Tribunal in Original Application No. 2745I'1989. 6. The writ petition is acc rdingly disposed of with the aforesaid direction. No order as to costs. 7. Certified copy as per rul . e Sdl- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O. ”W mamas, Wis,W o