IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.4123 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 31.03.2011. Arun Gupta --Petitioner Vs. Dr. Jagjit Singh Virk --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. D.K.Bhatti, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J, (Oral) This case was not argued by the petitioner/tenant on merits and practically it was dismissed. However, on 30.07.2010, time was granted for a period of 8 months to the petitioner/tenant to vacate the demised premises with certain conditions. Notice of motion was issued only to that limited extent as to whether that period is to be granted or not? Pursuant to the notice, Shri B.B.S. Sobti, Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent/landlord and submits that he does not mind if the order dated 30.07.2010 passed by this Court is maintained. In view thereof, the order dated 30.07.2010 passed by this Court is made absolute. It is, however, made clear that if the petitioner violates any of the conditions which are there in the order dated 30.07.2010, then that order would cease to operate and he would be liable under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. With these observations, the present revision petition is disposed of. March 31, 2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge