Page 1 of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.21809 of 2011 Hindol College, Khajuriakata & Another …. Petitioners None -versus- The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner-cum-Recovery Officer, Bhubaneswar and Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Nikhil Pratap, ASC (for O.P.2) Mr. S.S. Mohanty, Advocate (for O.Ps.1 & 3) Opposite Party No.4-None CORAM: JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO Order No. ORDER 19.07.2023 Hybrid Mode I.A. No. 18725 of 2011 08. 1. When the matter was last taken up on 11.07.2023, the following order was passed. “1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter being old, she has misplaced the case brief and may be accommodated. 2. Learned counsel for opposite party nos.1 & 3 submits that after disposal of the writ petition, I.A. No. 18725 of 2011 is not maintainable. 3. To grant another opportunity to the petitioners in the I.A., list on 19.07.2023.” 2. None appears for the petitioners though the matter is called twice over. 3. Learned counsel for opposite party nos.1 and 3 reiterates his submissions as noted in the earlier order dated 11.07.2023. It is further submitted Section 7-I of the // 2 // Page 2 of 2 Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short ‘the Act’) provides for appeal against order passed under Section 7-A of the Act. It is further submitted prayer sought for in the I.A. is misconceived in view of the disposal of the writ petition by order dated 01.12.2011. 4. Having heard the learned Additional Standing Counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned counsel for opposite party nos.1 and 3, the I.A. is dismissed being devoid of any merit. (M.S. Sahoo) Judge jyostna Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOSTNARANI MAJHEE Designation: Personal Assitant Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 21-Jul-2023 18:44:48 Signature Not Verified