IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 603 OF 2008 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF PROVIDENT FUND ... Petitioner Versus SMT. ERMINIA CRUZ AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Joseph Vaz,Central Government Standing Counsel for the petitioner. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 27th November, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Vaz, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for the petitioner. 2. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 19.04.2007 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panaji by which the Trial Court has held that the issue No.4 touching to the jurisdiction of the Court, cannot be decided as a preliminary issue and the same has to be decided after recording evidence of both the parties. 3. Having heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and having perused the record, I do not find that the Trial Court has committed any jurisdictional error to warrant interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction. The net result of the impugned order is that the petitioner, by leading evidence before the Trial Court, can satisfy the Court that the suit itself is not maintainable. Therefore, in my considered opinion, this is not a fit case in which this Court should exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of Constitution of India. Hence, the petition is dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA