1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3970 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 3970 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 3970 OF 2005 M/s. Shakti Commercial Premises Society ... Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. Respondents Mr. V.A. Thorat, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ulhas Kerkar for Petitioners. Mr. R.M. Kadam, Advocate General with Mr. R.D. Soni with Mr. P.I.Khemani, A.G.P. for State. Mr. M.S. Hegde with Mr. C.M. Lokesh i/by G.S. Hegde & Associates for Respondent No. 2. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & MRS R.S. DALVI.JJ. .JJ. .JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 12, 2005 DATED : DECEMBER 12, 2005 DATED : DECEMBER 12, 2005 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. . This court by interim order dated 19.8.2005 had directed the CIDCO to consider the representation made by the Petitioner. Pursuant to that petitioners did make representation to the CIDCO. CIDCO considered the same and submitted report. The Board of Directors of CIDCO by resolution dated 5.10.2005 took a decision to accept the report and 2 make allotment to the Petitioner. This was communicated to the State Government which has accepted the same. In the light of that, petition made absolute in terms of Prayer clause (a). No order as to costs. . It is made clear that if the petitioners have to pay any other legal dues according to rules and or bye-laws and or any other condition of CIDCO or also the agreement, they will be bound to pay the same. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (MRS. R.S. DALVI,J.)