Civil Revision No.4337 of 2006(O & M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4337 of 2006(O & M) Date of Decision:07.04.2010 Vikas Chand & Ors. .... petitioners Versus State of Haryana .....respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Vikram Singh,Advocate for the petitioners Mr.Kulvir Narwal, Additional Advocate General Haryana Mr.Atul Lakhanpal,Senior Advocate with Mr.Rohit Sharma, Advocate with Mr.D.R.Kairon, Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estate, Panchkula **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): An additional affidavit on behalf of Mr.D.R.Kairon, HCS, Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estate, Panchkula has been filed in the Court and the same is taken on record. In this affidavit, it has been stated that in the earlier affidavit he had wrongly stated that no notice was received by the Office of Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estate, Panchkula regarding the case in question. In fact, such information was received. Mr.D.R.Kairon, HCS, Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estate, Panchkula has submitted Civil Revision No.4337 of 2006(O & M) 2 unconditional apology before this Court for making a wrong submission before this Court. The apology is accepted. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the present revision petition with liberty to the claimants/petitioners to seek any other appropriate remedy in accordance with the law as provided under Section 28-A (3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Ordered accordingly. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 07.04.2010 neenu