IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 416 OF 2011 M/S. GOA BAGAYATDAR SAHAKARI KHAREDI VIKRI SAUNSTHA MARYADIT REP. THRO' M.D SHRI. ULHAS ANANT UMARYE ... Petitioner Versus MS. NEETA RAIKAR ... Respondent Mr. A. V. Nigalye, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shivraj Gaonkar, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 22nd July, 2011 P.C. Mr. S. Gaonkar, learned Advocate for the respondent undertake to file vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent within a period of one week. Undertaking accepted. 2. Heard Mr. A. V. Nigalye, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. S. Gaonkar, learned Advocate for the respondent. 3. By consent of the learned Counsel, the following issues are framed in case No. CLE/S&EA-5/2010. i. Whether the applicant proves that termination is illegal, unjustified and bad in law? ii. Whether the opposite party proves that refusal of employment to the applicant is legal and justified? iii. Whether the opposite party proves that it had not terminated the services of the applicant? iv. Whether the applicant is entitled to reinstatement with full back wages? v. Whether the opposite party proves that the application filed by the applicant is not maintainable? vi. Any other relief? 4. In view of the submissions made by learned Counsel for the parties, the authority under the Goa Shops and Establishments Act, 1973 shall frame the above issues and proceed to dispose of the case in accordance with law. 5. Writ Petition stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. vn