IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 20TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28486 of 2011(I) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- VANAJA, AGED 54 YEARS, W/O.RAJAN, PARATTIL VEEDU, KUNNATHARA.P.O., KOZHIKODE – 690533. NOW WORKING AS ICDS (INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE), SUPERVISOR, PANTHALAYANI ADDITIONAL PROJECT OFFICE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.R.SUDHISH SMT.M.MANJU SRI.K.R.RANJITH RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695001. 2. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695001. 3. DISTRICT OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, KOZHIKODE – 673020 4. SHEENA, SUPERVISOR, INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, PANTHALAYINI, KOZHIKODE – 673305. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.E.M.ABDUL KHADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: STU WP(C).No. 28486 of 2011(I) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 : COPY OF THE ORDER DTD 06/08/2011 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P2 : COPY OF THE ORDER DTD 19/10/2011 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P3 : COPY OF THE DISABILITY CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE MEDICAL BOARD TO THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE. STU K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.28486 of 2011-I. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 11th November, 2011. J U D G M E N T The learned Government Pleader has handed over to me a copy of proceedings of the Director of Social Welfare, the second respondent herein, Order No.E3-25/2011 dated 9.11.2011 by which, the petitioner has been ordered to be retained at the ICDS, Panthalayani in Kozhikode district. It is from the said post that she had been transferred as per Ext.P2. 2. In view of the fact that the transfer of the petitioner that is under challenge in this writ petition has already been cancelled, no further orders are necessary to be issued. Needless to observe that the petitioner would be entitled to be paid the arrears of salary, if any, due to her, provided they have not been paid so far. WP(C).No.28486/2011-I. 2 In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, (Judge) Kvs/-