IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 232 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 51 OF 2007 SHRI. SATISH VAMAN MADKAIKAR ... Applicant Versus SHRI. XAVIER D'SOUZA AND ANR., ... Respondents Ms. S. Rodrigues, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. M. D'Souza, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Coram:- S.A. BOBDE, J. Date:- 27th March, 2008 P.C. This is an application for modification of the Order dated 10.8.07. The applicant prays for deletion of the condition imposed for stay of the impugned judgments and orders dated 11.10.04 and 11.7.07. 2. The trial Court has convicted the appellant/applicant for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in respect of a cheque value of Rs.7,00,000/-. The trial Court ordered payment of compensation to respondent No.1 in the sum of Rs.14,00,000/-. 3. The judgment of the trial Court has been upheld by the appellate Court. 4. In revision, this Court stayed the Order dated 11.7.07 imposing sentence on the appellant/applicant, on the applicant executing bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- and on depositing a sum of Rs.10,50,000/- in the Court within a period of 4 weeks. Thereafter, in fact, the appellant/applicant prayed for further reduction of this amount and this Court reduced the amount of deposit to Rs.5,00,000/-. The applicant has not even deposited the said amount and has now applied for modification by deleting the condition itself. It is clear from the conduct of the applicant that he has no intention of complying with the orders of the Courts below or with the order of this Court, imposing the condition for staying the judgments of the lower Courts. In these circumstances, it is not possible to accept the argument of the learned Counsel for the applicant that the applicant deserves to be treated with leniency. 5. The application is, therefore, rerjected. Bail bonds of the applicant are discharged. S.A. BOBDE, J. ssm.