?are,.5^ttL&. ^•-'£"i:::'.-i^ ^ ^^'^ ^—;:'" -^ ' • ^:-/ <;; IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w,_p,_Ls) NO-yis^ i 2007 PETITIONER ...-•%^^ >°*' ^s^--"" ..•??p''^;'<^. ^•-^^..- ^. : JETENDRAKUMARKHARE, ^Y' Aged - about 34 years, S/o Late C. B. Khare, R/o Agra Mohalla, Behind Hathi Khana, Panna, Distt. Panna (M.P.) , . 1 Versus ^^%^ :-')!' -••'- RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through:- The Secretary, General Administration Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /- 2. Superintendent Engineer, Hasdeo Pariyogna Mandal,Water Resources Department Rampur, Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 3. The Executive Engineer, Mini Mata (Hasdeo) Bango Pariyojana Bango Bandha Division No.-3 Machadoli, Rampur Korba, Distt. Korba ( C. G.) i !lf 4. Smt. Kamlesh Khare,Wd /o - Late Shri C. B. Khare, aged - about 52 years, R/o Agra Mohalla.Behind Hathee Khana,Panna, Distt. Panna (M.P.) / U^^^'^A>^/IU<AjlS;llliS<><-<r:1r;?i"';:- •• s.'-'siaa 5. The ChiefEngineer, Mini Mata (Hasdeo) Bango Pariyojana Bangp Bandha Dwision Bilaspur, ^....,^T p^^^.^, .,/. ^uisn. Buaspur (i-;.u.) f '-'i^^L^i&sHar±^y^3^"^""^'^^ o^s^&yAA- ^^ ^TPIT^T, '^ftw^, ^dW3<' U.f.Cs; 6^3 4/^7 sn^i 'cra^i' ( sn^? -vf l<-ii+ ??1I 3?R^I WIR? '^I3?fci?^T;T 'HITT?Tf ^* 'fe^t' <JS>T^'R •^ • "iX^'^.VS^'SsV 'SSt 'Blff^ . ?TT'<&JTk?lTt'S^ S13t^Tl¥1 t^"(3<l3> T t l^VI^'IS^f^ !%lKc JiUiS'0<L;^y ^'l'Cm^iE£1t>^£€.Ijg.WAJi^.S^K. Shri Viiav Kuinar Deshniuy Siat. Ssiita Ghai, PL for thd &5. None for responderi.t No.4, Counsel for fhe petitioner s tnits that the candidature of j fhe petitioaer for coinpassionate ^ippomtment has been rejected h, counsel for the petitioner. State/Fespoiides.t Wos. 1 to -Siougii ser/ea. solelv on the ground tbat responflent No.4 Sint. Kainlesh Khare ~^J\ failed to give her consens)i for fhe appoiutnient of the petitioner on coinpasslonate respondent No.4 has failed to ap^eai' before fhis Coiirt aiid her sround. He subauts that son Jawendra Khare who hac} clamiiag coiiipassionate appoiut^nent has also with.d.Fawn his claim on 05.03.2004 aiisi tjic resoondeiit Nos. 1, 2 & 3 coiapassionate ground. He furtJi succession certiScate 'Annexure! earlier fJed an application •fore fhere is no hurdle for apponit tlie petitioner on ;r subicdts that even as per fhe R-li naiae ot fhe resuondent No.4 is at serial No. 1 whereas f9at of the petitioner is at serial No.2 aud wben no claim has beeit put fortii by respondent ^^o.4, the petitioaer is entifled for coippassionate appoijitraent. He submits t&at ia. view of the su stage the petitioaer inay be per^iitted to ••'i'iftidraw the present writ petition wiib. liberty to file ^tsequent developmeat, a fresli representetion before respondent No.5 and ia tura rt-spondertt No.S be directed to decide the same. L •%a£,«^I-HC-78 "3'Sf '^\iiWil, fS-^VI'a, \^V\W^( wC-C^ C,ci'ie/o7 sn^i 'WK (liciId'!<<]ET) sn^i w (<•<!+ 'cW 3:fT^I s^tticft <%a- ^TBiWHferan^i State counsel submits that representation before tlie respond be decided after considermg aUI accordauce with law. Accordingly, the petitioner petition with the aforesaid libertyj any fresh representation tey the four weeks froin the date of rece) expected fi-oia respondent No.5 fiirther period of fhree inontbs fij accordance with law. tet the Betitioner laake a fresh ilent No.5 and the saaie would fb.e asDects of the case iii |s permitted to wifhdraw this In the eventuaiity of BasldaK petiuoner with.in a. period of ^pt of copy of this ord.er, it is t.o, decide t'tse same witlun jora. the date of its receipt, ia <^ii(k/i<i1-rf 's^s^ '^ fe^st ^Rfl^K ^3ifipT3T!^T Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar