HIGH COURr OE CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR S.B. : HGN'BLE SHRI SATISHK. AGNIHQTM, J. WRIT PETITION (S) No. 2118 of2007 PETITIONER Smt. Rameshwari Kashyap Wife of Shri Mafaendra Kumar Kashyap, aged about 29 years, Resident ofvillage Baigakapa, Tahsil Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.). "•;: •;• • • .- VERSUS RESPONDENTS T^-B 2. 3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, DepartmentofWoman and Child Development D..K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Bflaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) The District Programme Officer, Unified Woman and Child Development ProjeCt, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur(C.G.) The Project Qfficer, Unified Woman and Child Development Project Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.). The Ghief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Lorini, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Smt. Amrita Bai Wife of Shri Ram Kumar Kashyap, aged about 25 years, Residerit of Village Baigakapa, Tahsil Lormi, District pilaspur (C.G.) %l^^^^j^^^^^ Present: Shri P.P.Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shi-i Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the Stote / respondentNo. 1 to 4. \: • •'"'<• ORDER (Passed on 5fh ofApril, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearirig for the petitioner submits that admittedly, the petitioner is having preferential right over respondent no 6 as Ifae petitioner has more marks in .8 Class examination certificate than fhe respondent no 6. However, in order to accommodate respondent no. 6, the marks of the petitioner has not bee shown. The father-in- law ofthe respondent no. 6 is a govemment servant, which disqualifies respondent no. 6 from being appointed as Angan Badi Worker. 2. Be that as it may, the Collector, Bilaspur, is directed to look into the allegations made by the petitioner and pass appropriate order after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties in accordance with law and as per Angan Badi scheme, within a period of four weeks from the date ofreceipt ofthis order. 3. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of.No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK. Judge Ainit