WPMS No. 1576 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioner. This is a defendant application filed against the order dated 27th July, 2010. It transpires that the plaintiff moved an application for appointment of a Commission so that the status of the possession on the spot is obtained and placed before the Court. The application of the plaintiff was rejected against which the plaintiff preferred a revision which was allowed by the impugned order. The revisional court remitted the matter again to the trial court to reconsider the plaintiff’s application for appointment of a Commissioner. The defendant, being aggrieved by the said order, has filed the present writ petition. Having heard the learned counsel for the defendant, this Court does not find any palpabale error which requires interference in a writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The matter has only been remitted again to the trial court to re- decide the plaintiff application afresh. It would be open to the defendant/petitioner to raise such objection before the trial court. The writ petition is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 08.09.2010 Shiv