1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.807 OF 2010 Khan Tanveer Anjum d/o Zafer Ahmed Khan ..Petitioner Versus Crescent Education Society, Aurangabad through its President Jalis Abdul Hamid and ors. ..Respondents Mr S.S.Kazi, Advocate for petitioner Mr A.M.Karad, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr D.R.Kale, A.G.P. for respondents 2 and 6 Mr U.B.Bondar, Advocate for respondent No.3 Mr A.S.Barlota, Advocate holding for Mr S.K.Barlota, Advocate for respondent No.4 Mr A.A.Khan, Advocate for respondent No.5 CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 22nd March 2011 PER COURT The petition has been preferred for a direction to respondents 1 to 6 to pay the salary of the petitioner, which is due and payable to her from 13th June 2000. It appears from the affidavits filed by the respondents that there is a dispute regarding the salary, which the petitioner is entitled to. In our opinion the controversy can be appropriately resolved under Section 4 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and not in a writ petition. The petitioner, therefore, ought to have exhausted the remedy available under Section 4 2 of the Act. Petition is dismissed giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority under Section 4 of the aforesaid Act. ( S.S. SHINDE, J.) ( SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. ) (vvr/807.10wp)