IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 573 OF 2010 SHRI. ALHABBHAKSH LATTEWALE ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. KASIM SAB KANGNALI ... Respondent Ms. S. Mukadam, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. Shet, Advocate for the Respondent. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 20th October, 2010 P.C. Heard Ms. S. Mukadam, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. Shet, learned Counsel for the Respondent. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 3rd July, 2010 passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Margao granting the application of the respondent to file the written statement beyond period of 90 days. 3. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the Order dated 3rd July, 2010 passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Margao in Special Civil Suit No. 151/2009/A, setting aside ex-parte order dated 15th January, 2010, subject to payment of costs. As such, the issue as to whether the learned Judge could have granted time to file the written statement to the respondent does not arise in the petition. 4. Upon perusal of the record, I am satisfied that the learned Judge was justified in setting aside ex-parte order. As such no interference is called for with impugned order. Needless to mention, in the event the petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the learned Judge, permitting the respondent to file written statement beyond period of 90 days, the petitioner is at liberty to avail of an appropriate remedy, as may be, available in law. 5. Writ Petition is disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. EV