IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 27TH OCTOBER 2009 / 5TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 30324 of 2009(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- PAULSON, S/O.PYNADAN ANTONY MANAVALASSERY VILLAGE MUKKUNDAPURAM TALUK, IRINJALAKUDA. BY ADV. SMT.VANAJA MADHAVAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SECRETARY IRINJALAKKUDA MUNICIPALITY 2. HEALTH INSPECTOR IRINJALAKKUDA MUNICIPALITY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.30324 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of October, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner applied for licence for conducting business of selling vegetables. The said application was rejected by the municipal secretary as per Ext.P9 order dated 9.9.2009. One of the grounds of rejection is that the application was not in the prescribed format. Leaving that part, different other reasons and criticisms are levelled. That order can be challenged in appeal/revision before the competent statutory authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the order is wholly baseless and without the support of any material. That is also a matter that can be appropriately urged before the appellate/ revisional authority. Different questions relatable to the views of the municipal secretary may arise for decision even on facts. It is inappropriate for this Court to step in as of now. Under such circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed preserving the right of the petitioner to seek remedy by way of appeal/revision, in accordance with law. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.2/11.