IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.71 of 2008 MAHANTH PRASAD S/O LATE BHIKHARI SAH, R/O VILLAGE- RAJOPATTI, P.S.- SITAMARHI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. NAGENDRA PRASAD S/O SUKHDEO PRASAD 3. SANJAY KUMAR S/O RAJESHWAR SAH 4. DILIP KUMAR RAI S/O LATE RAM SUDISH RAI 5. SHAMBHU PRASAD S/O RAM LOCHAN GUPTA ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAJOPATTI, P.S.- SITAMARHI, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI ----------- 9 20/07/2009 This application has been filed for grant of special leave to appeal against the judgment dated 16.7.2008 passed by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi Sadar in Complaint Case No. C- 1/47 of 2001 Trial No. 75 of 2008 whereby the opposite party nos. 2 to 5 have been acquitted. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there was consistence evidence that the accused persons have committed various offences so the learned trial court has erred in not appreciating the evidence. I have perused the judgment and heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 2. It appears that the learned trial court has given good reasoning in acquitting the accused persons. Contradictions have been taken into account and the grounds given by the learned trial court are correct and it 2 needs no interference. This application has no merit. It is accordingly, dismissed. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)