1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 5. CA/629/2010 (LAXMIBAI DEVAJI CHOUDHARI V/S BHATU GIRDHAR CHOUDHARI) In WP/5550/2009 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.S.B.Yawalkar, Adv., for the applicant. Mr.S.P.Tiwari, Adv., h/f Mr.N.L.Choudhari, Adv., for respondent. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:8/10/2010 1. Heard. In RCS No.112/1999, an application for amendment was moved by the plaintiff. Learned Judge allowed the same. The defendant has questioned it. 2. The embargo created in terms of Order 6 Rule 17, proviso of Civil Procedure Code, will not be available to be coined in the present proceedings as it is certainly prior to the effect of the amendment. The second aspect in the matter is that the features that are brought on record are 2 after institution of the suit and they will not be changing the basic structure of the suit. Consequently, allowing amendment by the learned Judge need not be questioned. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. Application (No. 629/2010) is disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/629-10ca