IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 1st Bail Application No. 795 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Vijay Singh .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 229/2010, U/s 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, PS Jawalapur, District Haridwar. August 27, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant submitted that the applicant is a physically handicapped person and he is even unable to walk without any support. He further submitted that even the allegations made against him are general in nature and he never demanded any dowry from his wife Smt. Geeta. He also submitted that applicant is in jail since 3.8.2010 and he has got no previous criminal history and the trial is yet to begin. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Vijay Singh be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 27.8.2010 PRABODH