IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 26364 of 2003 Between: Nimmakayala Laxminarayana, S/o Subbaiah Proprietor of Sri Laxminarayana Glass Ply Wood and Hard Ware Centre, Business at D.No.23-5-40, Shivaji Buildings, Union Bank Road, Patnam Bazaar, Guntur. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Deputy Inspector General of Police, Guntur Range, Guntur City, Guntur Dist., 2 Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, Guntur City, Guntur District. 3 Sub Inspector of Police, Law and Order, Lalapet Police Station, Guntur City, Guntur District. 4 Vanama Sitarama Nageswara Rao, Adopted s/o late Vanama venkata Ratnam, Business, r/o D.No.23-7-8, Isukavagu Sandu, Ramachandrapura Agraharam, Guntur City, Guntur Dist., 5 Tadikonda Srinivas, s/o Tadikonda Raja Rao Business in M/s.Vanama Appanna & Sons, Iron Merchants, Patnam Bazaar, Guntur City, Guntur Dist., 6 Tadikonda Babji, S/o Tadikonda Raja Rao, Business, in M/s.Vanama Appanna & Sons, Iron Merchants, Patnam Bazaar, Guntur City, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the form of writ of mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents: i) interfering with petitioner's business in Shop No.23-5-40, Shivaji Buildings, Patnam Bazaar, Guntur City. ii) detaining the petitioner's son Nimmakayala Murali Krishna is illegal and violative of fundamental rights offending Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3: i) not to interfere with petitioner's business in shop No.23-5-40, Shivaji Buildings, Patnam Bazaar, Guntur. ii) not to detain petitioner, petitioner's sons Nimmakayala Suresh Babu, Nimmakayala Murali Krishna and employees working under the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.D.V.REDDY (Not Present) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 6: P.R.PRASAD The Court made the following : ORDER: On 28-10-2004 when the case was listed, none appears on behalf of the petitioner, nor there was any representation. Even today again when the case is listed, none appears for the petitioner nor there is any representation on his behalf. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J. Dated 04-11-2004. skmr To 1 Deputy Inspector General of Police, Guntur Range, Guntur City, Guntur Dist., 2 Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, Guntur City, Guntur District. 3 Sub Inspector of Police, Law and Order, Lalapet Police Station, Guntur City, Guntur District. 4. 2CCs to G.P. for Home, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad, (OUT). 5. 2CD copies