WPMS No.688 of 2004 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Rajeev Bisht, the learned counsel for the petitioner. List has been revised. No one is present for the respondent nos.2 to 11. Issue no.1 & 2 was decided by the impugned order, which relates to the jurisdiction of the court and with regard to the valuation of the suit. The petitioner, being aggrieved, has filed the present writ petition. In the opinion of the court, the writ petition is not maintainable against an interlocutory order. The writ petition is dismissed and it would be open to the petitioner to question the validity of the impugned order after the suit is decided by taking it as a ground under Section 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 22.12.2011 LSR