@ $INGL£ BE§Q£§i N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.‘P. (S) No. 5R g3 12011 PETITIONER wBabulal Verma S/o Late Ram Milan Verma, aged about 67 years, R/o Jawahar Nagar Stadium, Near Post office, Ward No. 29, Satna, District Satna M.P. VERSUS / RESPONDENTS 1. State of C.G. through the Secretaly Revenue Department, DKS Bhawan Raipur, C.G. 2.?y’fhe Collector (Land Record) Kabirdham, District Kabirdham C.G. .wRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE ’ Q_E MANDAMUSICERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTIONIORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. I ’ BGH §QURT OF GHHAT?£5GARH AT BILA§PUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) WEP.(S) No. 5273 of 2Q11 Petitmner Babuia! Verma VERSUS Resnandents State of Chhattisgarh anci another Pra$em: Shri Rakesh Pandey, counSei fer the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Payashi, PL for the State. / a R D E R . (13139.2()11; The grievance of the petitioner is his medgcai bms amounting to Rs.11,Q35/— have not been paid to him de$pite severa! representations. 2. Learned counsei for the petitioner eubmits that from Annexure P-2, it is clear that'the claim of the petitioner to the tune of Rs.10,GOQ/— has beenadmitted but yet even that amount has also not been grantedto him. 3. Learned State counsei submits that let the petitioner tile a detailed representation before the respondent No.2 and in turn the same shall be decided in accordance with law. o He further points out that certain documents have to be given by the petitioner and he may be directed to submit all the documents along with the representation. 4. The present petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to fiie a detailed representation within 2 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order aiong with ail the documents before respondent No.2 and in turn the respondent No.2 shall make the entire endeavour to get the ease of the petitioner decided within 2 monthslfrom the date of filing of the said representation. H it is to be noted that for the petty ameunt of R31 1 2000/3 the petitioner, who is the Retired Revenue inspector, has beén compelled to approach this Court and while dealing with the case of the petitioner; the respondent No.2 will keep this fact in his mind. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge