THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.6592 OF 2010 DATED:23.03.2010 Between: Challa Krishna Reddy and another .. Petitioners And The Tahsildar, Kavali Mandal, Kavali, Nellore .. Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.6592 OF 2010 ORDER: The two petitioners are residents of Budumagunta Village of Kavali Mandal in Nellore District. They allege that second petitioner has lands admeasuring Ac.03.00 in Survey No.885 and Ac.0.47 cents and Ac.0.37 cents in Survey No.772/2 of the said village and that he is the owner of land admeasuring Acs.03.30 cents in Survey No.885. They claim that these properties are ancestral properties. They allege that in 2008, when there was an attempt to dispossess them, they filed a Writ Petition before this Court and the same was disposed of by this Court observing that the petitioners cannot be dispossessed without following due process of law. Even thereafter when there is standing crop, the Tahsildar, respondent herein, is interfering with their possession. They allege that no notice was issued on them. The Assistant Government Pleader (Andhra Area) has obtained instructions from the respondent. He submits that after this Court disposed of Writ Petition No.2773 of 2008 on 18.02.2008, the respondent issued notice under Section 7 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (the Act). Thereafter, eviction order was passed under Section 6 of the Act and the same was served on the petitioners on 12.04.2008 and 03.10.2008. In pursuance of the order under the Act, possession was taken under a cover of panchanama on 03.10.2008. The land was divided into small plots and house sites were allotted to the beneficiaries, who made arrangements for construction of huts under INDIRAMMA (Integrated Novel Development In Rural Areas and Model Municipal Areas) Housing Programme. In view of the submissions of the Assistant Government Pleader (there is no reason to disbelieve the same), it must be held that the Writ Petition is filed by making false averments. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ (V.V.S. RAO, J) 23.03.2010 KH