IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 592 OF 2008 SHRI. CUSTODIO FERNANDES AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH SECRETARY AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. V. P. Thali, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. A. Kamat, Addl. Government Advocate for Respondent nos. 1 and 2. Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for Intervenor. Coram:- P. B. MAJMUDAR & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 30th January, 2009 P.C. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner wants to withdraw the Petition in view of the instructions received from his clients. We reserve his right to challenge the allotment in future if need arises. Learned Counsel further submitted that regarding wrong allotments of shacks made to others, petitioner would like to make representation to Director of Tourism by way of appropriate application. 2. Considering the facts and circumstances, we permit the Petitioners to withdraw this Petition. However, we direct the Director of Tourism to decide the representation of the Petitioner, if made, in connection with allotment of shacks in accordance with law. The said representation may be decided within a period of four weeks from the receipt of the same from the Petitioner. The petition is disposed off as withdrawn subject to the directions made hereinabove. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. arp/*