IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 10699 of 2008 Between: Subhashini W/o.B.Thrinadha Village, Maldakal Mandal, R/o.D.No.7-9-177, Nallakunta, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Educational Officer, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. 2 The Director of School Education Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The Secretary to Government, Government of A.P. Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 4 Bheemasingi Trinadha S/o.L.Satyanarayana Srikivanipalem Village, Srungavarapukota Mandal, Vizianagaram District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to take appropriate action against the 4th respondent pursuant to the representation of the petitioner dated 2.11.2007 for continuing in service in spite of the order of suspension passed against him by the 1st respondent vide Rc.No.90/A3/2006, dated 27.04.2006 on the ground that he married his niece without the consent and knowledge of the petitioner who is 1st wife of the 4th respondent, in respect of which criminal proceedings in C.C.No.79/2006 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District was pending against the 4th respondent under Sections 498-A, 494 read with Sec. 109 of I.P.C. and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act forthwith in the interest of justice and pass such other or further orders as are necessary. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KUSURI.SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following ORDER: The petitioner is the wife of the fourth respondent, who is employed as S.G.T. in Mandal Parishad Upper Primary School in Vizianagaram District. Relationship between the petitioner and the fourth respondent was strained. The petitioner submitted a complaint before Gadwal Police Station, under Section 498-A and other relevant provisions against the fourth respondent. C.C.No.79 of 2006 was registered and the fourth respondent was arrested. Based upon the same, the competent authority placed the fourth respondent under suspension, through order, dated 27.04.2008. Alleging that her husband is continuing to work in the School despite the order of suspension, the petitioner submitted a representation, dated 02.11.2007, to respondents 1 to 3 to take necessary action. This writ petition is filed complaining that no action has been taken on her representation. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for School Education. The petitioner felt aggrieved on account of the fact that her husband, fourth respondent, was continuing to work even after suspension, consequent upon the arrest. She was of the view that there was no order of reinstatement. However, from the facts placed by the learned Government Pleader before this Court, it is evident that the fourth respondent was reinstated into service, through proceedings, dated 03.06.2006. Charges have already been framed and disciplinary proceedings are pending against the fourth respondent. Therefore, it cannot be said that there was any lapse on the part of respondents 1 to 3. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:19.06.2008. Kdl ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KURR}