^^^^^^^^^^^^8^ ^Mr^'a IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ABPELLANT ^aw: .<^). MFSC. APPEAL 1^0. 3<1 OF 2009 Sl -^^.. ^' ,^ fC • (^ S'Sfisip] '*f &> ^ ii 5^; fjr^ •^ •£>i art •s>^^ •Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Through Branch Manager, Branch Office, Shiv Mohan Bhawan, Vidhan Sabha Road, Pandri, Tahsil and District Raipur (CG) Policy No.O.G.09-2303-1803- 00000140, Period From 09/04/08 to 08/04/09 Insurer of Offending Vehicle ADE Auto No.CG05/D-0295 VERSUS RESPONDENTS -CLAIIV1ANT iSSitBs. 4. Chhowaram Dewangan, S/o Beniram Dewangan, Aged about 59 years, R/o Charouda, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (CG), presently residing at Tikrapara, infront of Police Station, Sanjay Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (CG) Shompuri Goswami, S/o Narottam Puri Goswami, Aged about years (not mentioned in the impugned judgment) ',• R/o Village Irra, Post-Korra, P.S. Bhakhara Kurud, Tahsil Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) (Driver and Owner of Offending vehicle ADE Auto No.CG05/D- 0295) -w^ IVIISC. APPEAL UNDER S£CT10N:173OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 AGAINST THEJ3RDER/AWARD DATEQ 28yMARCH, 2009 PASSED IN C.T. N0.1J1/09 BY LEARNED">&Dl31Tr6lMAL IUIOTOR ACCIDENT CLAINIS TRIBUNAL (FTC), RAIPUR (CG} PRESIDED OVER BY SMT. KANTA MARTIN /in 0-7Q/ RAJESH KUMAR SONTEKE Digitally signed by RAJESH KUMAR SONTEKE Date: 2025.02.03 16:55:36 +0530 RAJESH KUMAR SONTEKE Digitally signed by RAJESH KUMAR SONTEKE Date: 2025.02.03 17:07:03 +0530 ^"•^tv- ..,.--<'.^ ""'i^_ •••-St. 'i- ~~ '"'I J ,&1 aWCT'haN? g 'e'aWRi^siN' I •..?SEr •^iTCff^pT; '®W?PTs,'pSRTOy /v'.A.C:..t.?..^J...AJ?..-. n HWI l^i i'-iil^^^ S.B. Hon'bleShri Justice N.K.Aaarwal 11-08-2009 Shri G.S. Patel, cou^sel on behalf of Shri Abhishek Sinha, counsel for appellant.j Learned counsel appearlng Tor the appellant, on instruction, seeks permissi^n of this court to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file cro^s-objection in case the claimants file an appeal agalnst the av^ard dated28-03-2009 passed by the Addl. Motor Accident C^laims Tribunal (FTC), Raipur in Claim Case N0.01/^)09. Pr^yer is allowed. Consequently, the apjpeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated liberty.l No orderasto costs. Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge t'ST %..