IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4887 of 2007 DULARI DEVI WIFE OF LATE PRABHU RAM, RESIDENT OF KACHAHARI STATION, ROAD, P.S. CHAPRA TOWN, DISTRICT- SARAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY-CUM-COMMISSIONER, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE COMMISSIONER, SARAN DIVISION, CHAPRA 4. THE COLLECTOR, SARAN AT CHAPRA 5. THE CHAIRMAN, NAGAR PARISHAD, CHAPRA 6. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NAGAR PARISHAD, CHAPRA ----------- FOR THE PETITIONER : MR. GYAN PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR THE NAGAR PARISHAD : MR. RUPAK KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR THE STATE : MR. RAGHRENDRA KR. SINGH, AC TO GA 5 **** 3 19.07.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the respondent-Nagar Parishad. Mr. Rupak Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Nagar Parishad files a Vakalatnama, which is kept on record. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon her superannuation on 30th June, 2006 as Sweeper from the services of the respondent- Nagar Parishad, the pensionary benefits as indicated in paragraph 1 of the writ application have not been settled and paid as yet. Mr. Rupak Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Nagar Parishad submits that the claims of the petitioner are not clearly spelt out either in the writ application or in the representation, however, upon consideration the admissible dues found payable shall be paid within a period of three months. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for - 2 - the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.6. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of two months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable may also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)