BENOH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION N0. ^S ^ ° / 2005 PETITIONER: _c^.^° .^^^ ..^y'" -'^>'°" ...T'v0.1-"" ^^:'y ^'^^ Tapas Kumar Dutta, S/o Shri M.C. Dutta, aged about 47 years, Profession- Peon (Contingency Paid), R/o 7/10, M. Housing Board Colony, Industrial Area, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS: -^ ,^> VERSUS •^ 1. The State ofChhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department oflndustry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur, (C.G.) /"l. The State ofMadhya Pradesh, Tlirough the Secretary, Department oflndustry Vallabh Bhawan, Mantralaya, Bhopal, (C.G.) ^ 3. The Managing Director, M.P. State Laghu Udyog Nigam Maryadit, Pnchanan Bhawan Forth Flor Malviya Nagar Bhopal, M.P. / 4. The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. B-4, M.R.Colony, Shilendra Nagar, Raipur, /5. Unionoflndia, Through the Secretary, Department ofPersonnel & Trainmg, 3rd FIoor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUENCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBTION, CERTIORARI, AND ANY OTHER WRITS, DIRECTIONS OR ORDERS. T XI-HC-22 3T^T^T f^rlJch 3^? ^H\^ 'H[^a Qow?1 + y,^ ^^ ^ -^^ "^TFT^Pf, ^-d1^^<o. t^lt^ry 63 'WR^IT^P??^ ^...^l^ "f^^" "W1, 200 ^?T^<TTW^ftn 18-1-2006 Shri N.K. Vyas, coynsel Shri S.P. Kale, Govt. Heard. Learned counsei for thel relates to appointment of the Vyas, legrned counsel appearijig the present ends of justice wjii| the respondent authorities to petitioner. The prayer is not opposeja l Having considered and the merits of the case the petitl representation raising his grie\t aiongwith a copy of the petition | weeks from today and on sij' respondent No.4 shail decid^ accordance with law as eariy a| oftwo months from the date of With the aforesaid disposed of. Consequentiy, M.fW.) disposed of. Certified copy as per rul^s '^N^1'^'RT^Tf ^ tt^ Tf^R ^"3T^OT3?T^I f^r the petitioner. Adv|ocate for the Stete of Chhattisgarh. petitioner submits that the matter rietitioner on permanent cadre. Shri for the petitioner states that for |be sen/ed if a direction is given to decide the representation of the ppose|j by the State counsel.. Iwithout expressing any opinion on loner is directed to make a detaiied ^ances before the respondent No.4 |and this orderwithin a period oftwo jch representation being fiied, the the same on its own merits in possibie preferably within a period feceipt of representation. oi3servations, this petition. stands P.No.4153/2005 also stands Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^^fe^ ^