1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7294 OF 2009 Shaikh Khayum s/o Osmansaheb Petitioner Versus Shaikh Abdul Gani s/o Osmansaheb and others Respondents Mr.Dhananjay Deshpande, advocate for petitioner. Mr.C.R.Deshpande, advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 06th April, 2010. PER COURT : 1 The trial Court, in view of the provisions of Order 7 Rule 14 (3) of Code of Civil Procedure, permitted production of documents after recording of evidence of the parties is over and said interlocutory order, passed by trial Court during continuance of suit, is subjected to challenge in this petition. 2 It cannot be controverted that sub rule (3) of Rule 14 of Order 7 of Code of Civil Procedure, invests power with the trial Court to permit a party to place on record the documents, which ought to be presented along with plaint and which are either entered in the list annexed to the plaint or not. The objection raised by defendant no.1 for late production of the documents is on the ground that those are not referred to in the plaint. 2 3 Order 7 Rule 14(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure invests power with the trial Court to permit a party to place on record the document, which is either entered in the list annexed to the plaint or not. Considering nature of objection and considering the fact that impugned order is of interlocutory character, no interference, in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is called for. Petition is devoid of substance. 4 Writ Petition, therefore, stands rejected. ( R. M. BORDE) JUDGE adb/wp729409