IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 64 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 662 OF 2003 SMT. LISETTE E.R. CAMARA, PANAJI-GOA. ... Applicant Versus STATE OF GOA AND 5 ORS., ... Respondents Applicant in person. Mr. S. Bandodkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. H. Kankonkar, Advocate for respondents No. 3 to 6. Coram:- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 15th March, 2011 P.C.:- Heard the applicant appearing in person and the learned Addl. Govt. Government Advocate appearing for respondents No.1 and 2. Our attention is invited by the learned Addl. Govt. Advocate to the order dated 27th September, 2010. He submits that pursuant to the said order, the applicant ought to have joined the affected persons as party respondents, but instead the applicant seeks deletion of some of the parties who are already impleaded. 2. We have perused the application and heard the applicant, who states that one Ms. Monica Coutinho need not be joined because her chances are not affected and she, in any event, has given in writing that she is not interested in the controversy. 3. At the request of the applicant, leave to amend the writ petition is granted in terms of the schedule. If the applicant is deleting any party or not joining anybody who is likely to be affected by the controversy in the petition, the said deletion/non-joinder is at her risk. 4. Subject to the same, the application is granted and disposed of. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. F. M. REIS, J. ssm.