IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2757 of 2009 DAROGA SINGH SON OF LATE PADUM SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA MAGADH VIHAR, H.NO. 26-B, P.S. GARDANIBAGH, DISTRICT- PATNA-4 Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI P.P. OJHA, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR STATE CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD, ASHOK RAJ PATH, PATNA ----------- 2 09.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also Mr. Kishore Kumar Sinha learned counsel appearing for the opposite party Bank. The learned counsel for the Opposite Party submits that from the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner, it would appear that since the orders have been issued whereby a direction has been given to the authority concerned for admissible payments to the petitioner as the order having been complied with this contempt application need not proceed further. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the order annexed with the supplementary affidavit whereby payments have been made are not correct amount as such petitioner is entitled to receive more amount, and therefore, petitioner proposes to represent the matter/assail the order before the appropriate forum. In this view of the matter, this contempt application stands disposed of. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)