In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... C.W.P. No.9033 of 2002 ..... Date of decision: 22.09.2006 Santosh Kumari .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents .... Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.S. Saron Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.S. Patwalia Present: Mr. V. Ramswaroop, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. M.S. Bedi, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4. Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Advocate for respondent No.5. Mr. B.S. Sidhu, Advocate for respondent No.6. Mr. Rajdeep Singh Cheema, Advocate for respondent No.7. Mr. H.K. Aurora, Advocate for respondent No.8. ..... S.S. Saron, J. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.8-Municipal Council, Pathankot submits that the family pension from 13.1.1994 to February 2000 was released by respondent No.2 to the petitioner @ 18% per annum calculated for the period from 1994 to April 1999. Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the said interest that has been paid. C.W.P. No.9033/2002 [2] In view of the above, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. (S.S. Saron) Judge September 22, 2006. (P.S. Patwalia) Judge *hsp*