IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40542 of 2009 CHHEDI RAI, SON OF LATE BANSH LAL RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BEDAUL BAGHNOCHA TOLA, P.S. AURAI, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. ---- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. MANOJ KUMAR, SON OF NOT KNOWN, CASHIER, BANK OF BARODA, BRANCH DHARHARWA, P.S. AURAI, DISTRICT MUZAFFAPUR. 3. AJIT KUMAR THEN BRANCH MANAGER, BANK OF BARODA, BRANCH DHARHARWA, P.S. AURAI, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. 4. S.B. BAGH THEN BRANCH MANAGER, BANK OF BARODA, BRANCH DHARHARWA, P.S. AURAI, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. ---- OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 2 19.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed against the order dated 3.12.2008, passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur in Trial No. 835 of 2009 (Arising out of Complaint Case No. 2463/1) by which the Magistrate has dismissed the application filed on behalf of the informant to add the Bank Officials as accused in this case, and the order dated 25.6.2009, passed by the District & Sessions Judge, Muzaffapur in Cr. Rev. No. 260 of 2008 affirming the order of the Judicial Magistrate. An application was filed on behalf of the informant that the money entrusted to Bali Ram Rai who could not have withdrawn the money from the Bank, without connivance of the Bank Officials and as such they should be arrayed as accused persons in this case. However, it appears that the Courts below have considered the fact that there is no material to justify the allegation that Bali Ram Rai was in connivance with the Bank Officials and as such application filed under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been 2 dismissed by the Court. I do not think that the orders are unreasonable or illegal and as such there is no reason for this Court to interfere with the impugned orders. This application is dismissed. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)