IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No.2844 of 2000 Date of Decision: 2.8.2010 Smt.Munni Devi and another. ....... Petitioners through Shri Sanjay Mittal, Advocate. Versus State of Haryana and others. ....... Respondent nos.1 to 6 through Shri Ajay Gulati, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Respondent nos. 7 to 33 through Shri Sanjiv Kaushik, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? .... Mahesh Grover,J. This petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing notification dated 21.9.1999 (Annexure P2) issued by respondent no.1 being illegal and unconstitutional. A further prayer has also been made for directing the official respondents not to hold elections to the newly constituted Wards of Municipal Council, Rewari on the basis of Annexure P2. C.W.P. No.2844 of 2000 -2- .... At the hearing, learned counsel for the parties stated that in view of the fact that elections to the Municipal Council, Rewari have since been held twice over after issuance of the impugned notification, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the above statement, the instant petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. August 2,2010 ( Mahesh Grover ) “SCM” Judge