IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No. 296 of 2005 In Letters Patent Appeal (Stamp) No. 27548 of 2005 In First Appeal No. 1100 of 2002 In L.C. Suit No. 2487 of 1998 Mr. Avinash Thodankar, Mumbai & Ors. .. Applicants V/s. Mrs. Aishabai Fakir Mohamed Sheikh & Ors.. Respondents Mr. Ashok M. Saraogi for the Applicants Mr. P.S. Dani for the Respondent Mr. Y.R. Shah for the added Respondent Ms. Nisha Dabhade for BMC-Respondent No. 6 CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED : 09.12.2005. DATED : 09.12.2005. DATED : 09.12.2005. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicants and the learned counsel for the Respondents. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide, hence Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)