1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 7156 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 417 OF 2005 Chhagan Anaji Ghanchi .. Applicant. vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. Abhaykumar Apte for the applicant. Smt. P.H. Kantharia, A.P.P. for the State. Coram: Coram: Coram: J.N. PATEL &, J.N. PATEL &, J.N. PATEL &, R.S. R.S. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. MOHITE, JJ. MOHITE, JJ. Date: Date: Date: 18th January, 2007. 18th January, 2007. 18th January, 2007. P.C. . The advocate for the applicant states that he does not press this application and seeks leave to withdraw the same. Application dismissed as withdrawn. 2. We are informed that the other accused in the case have also preferred appeals and one of the appeals is Criminal Appeal No. 441 of 2005. The advocate for the appellant states that the hearing of the appeal may be expedited. He contends that one of the ground in 2 the appeal is that his advocate did not appear at the stage of cross-examination of some of the material witnesses. He concedes that as far as the other accused persons were concerned, they were duly represented by advocates and in fact all the witnesses were cross-examined. In our view, the appeal cannot be expedited and may be heard in regular course along with other connected appeals. 3. Record and proceedings be sent back to the trial court for preparation of paper book. (J.N. (J.N. (J.N. Patel, J. Patel, J. Patel, J. ) (R.S. (R.S. (R.S. Mohite, J.) Mohite, J.) Mohite, J.)