IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2009 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 1422 of 2009() ----------------------------- CMP.294/2009 of MUNI-MAGI.COURT,PONNANI .................... CRIME NO.33/2009 OF PERUMPADAPPA POLICE STATION PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.12,13 AND 14 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NAJEEB, S/O.ABU, KELAM VALAPPIL HOUSE, ESWARAMANGALAM AMSOM, KOTTATHARA. 2. SHAHUL HAMEED, S/O.HAMSA, PUTHUPARAMBIL VEEDU, NARIPARAMBU, KALADI DESOM. 3. MOIDEENKOYA @ KUNHIPPA, S/O.MUHAMMED, KAVUPPADATH VEEDU, NARIPARAMBA, KALADI DESOM. BY ADV. SRI.SUNNY MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT --------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUMPADAPPA POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ========================= Bail Application No.1422 of 2009 ============================ Dated, this the 24th day of March, 2009 ORDER Petitioners, who are accused Nos.12,13 and 14 in Crime No.33 of 2009 of Perumpadappa Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143,147,148,452,395 and 436 read with 149 IPC seek their enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 22.02.2009. The petitioner were arrested on 27.02.2009. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the legal injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) sj