IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 20TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 1ST PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 949 of 2009(K) ------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHIBU.M.B, S/O. BABU.M.M, RESIDING AT FLAT NO. B. 26, MADAMBIKKATTIL HOUSE, PRIMA LAND MARK, KOORKENCHERY POST, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.BHASKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 2. THE REENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR. 3. THAHSILDAR, THRISSUR. 4. M/S. LIFE GROUP DEVELOPERS AND PROMOTERS, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, MR. ROSHAN, T.C. 3528, C 29/502, SWAMY VIVEKANANDA ROAD, THRISSUR, PIN - 680 001. ADV. SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE FOR R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No.949 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of February, 2009. JUDGMENT Heard the counsel for the petitioner and also the learned counsel who entered appearance for the 4th respondent. 2. The allegation in this writ petition is that the 4th respondent is in possession of certain Puramboke Land and that despite application having been made the authorities have not taken any action. 3. The counsel for the 4th respondent denies the allegation and submits that whatever in his possession are the properties under his ownership. 4. As already noticed, the complaint of the petitioner is regarding the inaction of the respondents on Ext.P4 application made by him. If as stated such an application is received, it is for the respondents to take cognizance of the WP(c).No.949/09 /2/ same, obviously with notice to the petitioner and 4th respondent, who has a right to be heard. Since no action is allegedly taken on Ext.P4 by the first respondent, I direct the petitioner to produce a copy of this judgment before the first respondent, who thereupon, shall take action on Ext.P4, if the same has been received and is pending. Any action on Ext.P4 shall be only with notice to the 4th respondent and after considering his objection also in the matter. Needful shall be done without delay. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.949/09 /2/