PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH C.R. 1333 of 2009 Date of decision: 8.10.2009 Mool Chand petitioner vs Neeta Devi Respondent Present: Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate Ms. Kusum Sharma, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. Vide impugned order an application filed by the petitioner for examining Shamsher Singh Malik, Handwriting and Finger Print Expert to prove his report pertaining to certain letters written by his real brother and his respondent-wife to his brother, has been dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner's wife has got illicit relations with many people, including his real brother Kamal Singh. Certain letters Ex.P1 to P3 and one diary are required to be proved on the record by examining Shamsher Singh Malik, Handwriting and Finger Print Expert as the said expert has prepared the report. He also wants to re-examine PW Kamal Singh. I have considered the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner and I am of the view that no interference is required to be made in the impugned order as the case of the petitioner from the very beginning is that his wife had illicit relations with his real brother Kamal Singh. The letters, alleged to have been written by his wife, were within his knowledge. He could have established that the letters had been written by his wife by examining the Handwriting Expert earlier. He wants to examine the said Handwriting Expert in rebuttal evidence. The same has rightly been declined by the impugned order. No ground for interference is made out. Dismissed. October 8 ,2009 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE