IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1658 of 2009 Date of decision:25.03.2009 Naphe Singh ...Petitioner versus Samay Singh and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. The revision is against the order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal directing the side of the claimant be closed on the ground that the claimant did not produce his witness on the date when it was posted. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Disability Certificate was required to be proved by examination of a Doctor. Since he had been transferred to another place, his attendance in Court could not be secured. In the interest of justice, I deem it appropriate to give one more opportunity for the claimant to establish his case and set aside the order passed by the Tribunal. The petitioner shall produce his witness at his own risk and cost on the date when the case is posted for evidence of the respondent, and the Tribunal shall grant opportunity to examine the Doctor to prove the Disability Certificate before he closes the evidence. 2. In the above observations, the Civil Revision is disposed of. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 25.03.2009 sanjeev