IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND SEPTEMBER 2011 / 31ST BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 24991 of 2011(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. HARRY JOSEPH, PALAKKAL HOUSE, VALAPPU EAST, OCHANTHURUTHU.P.O., KOCHI-682508. 2. ABEY.A.C., S/O. CHANDRABOSE, AREEKKATTU HOUSE, KALANADIKOLLY.P.O., PULAPPALLY, WAYANAD-673579. 3. KRISHNA PRASAD.E.C., USHES, THARAYAPARAMBIL HOUSE, S.N.JUNCTION, TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM-682301. BY ADV. SMT.MEDONA LOPEZ RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. PIN-673635. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673635. BY SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW - SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 24991 of 2011(Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE EXAMINATION RESULTS OF THE 1ST PETITIONER EXT.P2: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF FEE RS.1140/- REMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE EXAMINATION RESULTS OF THE 2ND PETITIONER EXT.P5: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF FEE RS.515/- REMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P7 : COPY OF THE EXAMINATION RESULTS OF THE 3RD PETITIONER EXT.P8: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER. EXT.P9: COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF FEE RS.1015/- REMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE ab ANTONY DOMINIC, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No. 24991 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of September , 2011. JUDGMENT Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 8th Semester examination was declared, they had failed in some papers. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within ten weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE rkc //True copy// PA to Judge