D B HON’BLE Mr JUSTICE SUNIL KlJMARtSINHA & A‘ ‘ HON’BLE Mr JUST!CE RADHE §.HYAM $HAR‘M V i I s I ‘ WRIT APPEAL NO.8‘3‘!I2011. i -Klran Kumar Blnjhwar Sfo Late Dukalu Smgh Blnjhwar , aged about 28 years R/ VIHage ‘-Chlchoh Post Qhih0!l ‘Tahsn Kartaia District Koirba (C.G.) x ‘ APPELLANT 1x §. Versus State of Chhamstarh hrough Secretary, School Department T Education Méntkalaya DKs Bhawan I Rarpu Dlstnct Rarpur (C G) State of Chhattlsgarh ' Through Secretary Genera Administration cépartment Mantralaya D KS Bhawa ' Raipur District Raipur (C G) State of Chhattisgarh . Through the Secretary, Panchayat and ,VSocial Services” Department, 'Mantrataya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, District RaipUr (C.G,) Collector - (Triba Development Korba Distric Korba (C G) The Commissioner, Tribal Development State o Chhattisgarh Raipur District Raipur(C G) District Educationl Officer r Korba, District Korba (C.G.) ‘, Chief Executive Officer' ‘ 'Janpad Panchayat Kartala g District Korba C G ( ) r RESPONDENT$ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR o , l ' 5 " , ,7 n : I - ' u l v t f g' ‘ “ WRIT APPEAL NO.81/2011 WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2(1! OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO THE DIVISION BENCH) ACT, 2006 t Appearance Mr Govmd Dewangan Counsei forthe appenant Mr U N S Deo Government Advocate for respondents 1 to 6 ORAL ORDER g r (10.052011) The following order of the Court was passed by sunil KumarrSinha, J. Heard on admission. ‘ Being aggrieved with the order dated 15.12.2010 passed in W.P.(S) No.7297/2010, the appellant/petitioner has filéd this writ appeat. By» the impUgned order dated 15.12.2010, many writ .petitions - including W.P.(S) No.7297/2010 were decided and they were accordingly dismissed. Against the ‘said order of dismissal, the petitioners in? 7 writ petitions filed different Writ Appeals including WA. No 80/2011 All the Writ Appeals were‘heard and dismissed by a common judgment dated 28 03 2011 passed by a DiVISIon Bench of this Court it is stated at bar that this Writ Appeal may also be dismrssedfdisposed of In terms of the common Judgment ated 28.03.2011 passed int WA. No.80/2011 and other connected Writ Appeals, arising out of the same common order passed by theleamed Single Judge. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed in terms of the judgment dated 28.03.2011 passed in WA. No.80/2011 and other connected Writ Appeals. Sdl- t Radhe Shyam Sharma 1 Judge g i H) y d § W