THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO.2350 of 2005 30th November 2005 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 27.09.2005 in W.P.NO.18085 OF 2005 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 M.V.Laxman Rao S/o.Sri Venkat Ratnam, APTRANSCO, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad. 2 AP TRANSCO, Vidyut Soudha, Khairtabad, Hyderabad rep.by its Chairperson & Managing Director. 3 The Divisional Engineer, (Elec), EHT & SSAP Transco, Chandrayangutta, Champapet, Hyderabad-500079. ...APPELLANTS AND Eranna S/o.Late Sri Sayanna, H.No.8-2-684/96/9, NBT Nagar, Road No.12, Near Kaman, Hyderabad –500034. ...RESPONDENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO. 2350 OF 2005 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Prakash Rao) Heard both the sides. In this appeal, the respondent herein who is the writ petitioner, seeks to assail the order dated 27.09.2005 in W.P.M.P.No.23022 of 2005 in W.P.No.18085 of 2005 passed by the learned single Judge giving certain directions in regard to payment of certain terminal benefits and ordering notice. Though several contentions sought to be urged on behalf of the appellants herein to show that the impugned action is only submitting the case of the respondent to Medical Board that too, in terms of the earlier orders passed by this Court, we are not going into the merits of this case since on the face of it the order appears to be the interim order only before filing any counter affidavit by the appellants herein. Hence, the appellants herein can as well file counter affidavit for vacating the impugned order. We do not find any merits in this appeal and it is not a fit case to go into the merits of the case at this stage. Accordingly the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs. __________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J _____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 30th November 2005. Chvn.