1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.07.2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.5395 of 2011 Bhuvana @ Bhuvaneswari ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur. 2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Brach, Karur. ...Respondents Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed Revision Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 2nd respondent, the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Karur to register the case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 16.11.2010 forwarded by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Kulithalai. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan, G.A.(Crl. Side) ORDER This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent, the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Karur to register the case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 16.11.2010 forwarded by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Kulithalai. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the alleged occurrence for the offence under Sections 403, 406, 417 and 420 I.P.C., has been taken place on 05.04.2002 to 05.04.2010. He has given a complaint before the respondent police on 14.02.2011 but, so far no action has been taken on his complaint. Hence, the petitioner has availed the alternative remedy as per the dictum laid down in Sakiri Vasu vs.State of Uttar Pradesh and Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Kulithalai. Even though the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Kilithalai has forwarded the complaint under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., the 2nd respondent has not registered the case and hence, the petitioner has come forward with this application. 3.Heard the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondents. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, even though the petitioner has availed the alternative remedy as per the dictum laid down in Sakiri Vasu vs.State of Uttar Pradesh and Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409, and the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Kulithalai has also forwarded the complaint to the 2nd respondent under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., the 2nd respondent has not taken any steps to register the complaint. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5.In such circumstances, the 2nd respondent is directed to take appropriate action on the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Kulithalai and to register the case on the complaint given by the petitioner, if any cognizable offence is made out. 6.With the above direction, this criminal original petition is disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AS) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur. 2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Brach, Karur. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High court, Madurai Copy to : The Judicial Magistrate NO.I, Kulithalai Arul GH : 21.07.2011 : 2p/5c Crl.O.P(MD)No.5395 of 2011 14.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/