IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16685 of 2011 SUNIL KUMAR SINGH @ SUNIL KUMAR, S/o Vijoy Singh, Resident of Village – Bhura, P.S.- Vajeerganj, District – Gaya. ------- Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ Opp. Party ----------- 2 13.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The petitioner, who is in custody from the date of occurrence i.e. 25.11.2010, in Kiul G.R.P. Case No. 64 of 2010 for the offence under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. It was alleged that the petitioner along with one co-accused had stolen attachiee of the informant, where after, on chase, the petitioner was apprehended, however, co-accused succeeded in fleeing away along with the attachiee. It was alleged by the informant that the petitioner had disclosed the name of co-accused as Ranjeet Kumar. Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer for bail. It was submitted that it was a case of theft on 2 running train, and as such, petition for bail may be rejected. In view of nature of accusation and period of custody, let the petitioner namely, Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Kumar be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Kiul in connection with Kiul G.R.P. Case No. 64 of 2010. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)