IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD FEBRUARY 2010 / 14TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 3337 of 2010(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- KUNJUMON VARGHESE, S/O.C.C.VARGHESE, AGED 42 YEARS, R/AT CHERIYAPATAPARAMBIL HOUSE, XIV/517, CHULLICKAL WEST, THOPPUMPADY, KOCHI-5, RAMESWARAM VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DIST. KERALA. BY ADV. SRI.TOM JOSE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, R/BY SECRETARY PANCHAYATH/URBAN AFFAIRS, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY CORPORATION OF COCHIN, KOCHI CORPORATION OFFICE, ERNAKULAM, KERALA STATE 3. ASSISTANT HEALTH OFFICER (ISSUING AUTHORITY OF BIRTH CERTIFICATES) CORPORATION OF COCHIN, KOCHI CORPORATION OFFICE, ERNAKULAM KERALA STATE ADV. SRI.K.ANAND, SC, COCHIN CORPN. FOR R2 & 3 GP K.R.DEEPA SC SRI.S.RAMESH BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).3337/2010 -------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of February, 2010 JUDGMENT 1. Petitioner submits that he and his wife are presently employed in Rome, Italy. According to him, the name of his children are entered as Kiran C.K. And Ashia C.K, in the records of the 3rd respondent. He wants to get the name corrected as Kiran Cheriya pataparambil Kunjumon and Ashia Cheriya pataparmbil Kunjumon. It is stated that for this purpose, he has filed Ext.P8 representation before the 2nd respondent. Thereafter the writ petition was filed complaining that there is inordinate delay in considering the said application. 2. Today when the matter came up for orders, the learned counsel for the Corporation has confirmed receipt of Ext.P8. At the same time, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 2.2.2010, the 3rd respondent granted an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and that he has produced Ext.P10 before the Secretary. W.P.(C).3337/10 2 3. If as stated by the petitioner, the application has been received and the petitioner has already been heard, what is now required to be done is that orders shall be passed on Ext.P8 on an expeditious basis. 4. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 3rd respondent to pass orders on Ext.P8 in the light of the other documents produced by the petitioner. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one week of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs