1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4190 OF 2010. Dr.Devidas B.Deshmukh ..vs.. Dilip S.Bhugul and anr. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Smt.Khisti P.Pali,Adv.for the petitioner. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 3, 2010. After considering the material on record, the courts have found prima facie balance of convenience and possibility of irreparable loss in favour of the plaintiff. Courts have made some observations about possible collusion between respondent nos.1 and 2. However, in writ jurisdiction I am not ready to go into all those aspects. I do not find any jurisdictional error or perversity. Writ petition is not entertained. But considering the fact that the petitioner was at the relevant time residing out side and has retired, the proceedings in R.C.S.No.108 of 2009 are expedited and the trial court shall attempt to decide the same as early as possible and in any case within period of one year from the date of communication of this order. Writ petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE Chute