/ 26 * -r IN THE HIGH COURT OF c.R.P. 83t20t1 VK RAMAKRISHNAN Through: RAM AVTAR TYAGI Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Petitioner Mr. Nawab Singh Jaglan, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Y a ORDER 08.07.2011 cM APPL. t2t78l20tr Exemption as prayed for is granted subject application stands disposed of accordingly. cM APPL. t2t77l20ll For the reasons given in the application, affidavit, the delay in filing the revision petition is stands disposed of accordingly. to all just exceptions. This c.R.P.83/2011 I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner'. After considering the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner i and going through the impugned order of the trial Courl, whereby petitioner- defendant's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC has been dismissed I find that there is no material inegularity in the impugned order justiffing any interference bv this Courl in exercise of revisional iurisdiction. This petition is accordingly dismissed in limine. "/, which is supported by an condoned. This application P.K. BHASIN,J JULY 08,201lipg Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified