CWP No.20078 of 2009 Date of decision : 22.04.2010 Nitin Vs. State of Haryana and others Present: Mr.Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.R.K.S.Brar, Addl.AG, Haryana. * * * Permod Kohli, J The petitioner was student of 1st Semester in Govt. Polytechnic Manesar, District Gurgaon. He was invoved in FIR No.146 under Sections 363, 366, 376 and 120-B IPC registered at Police Station, Kanina, District Mohindergarh. He surrendered himself before the Court on 9.9.2009 and was sent to observation home due to his own unlawful act at that time. The petitioner was eventually released on bail on 21.10.2009. It is admitted case of the petitioner that he remained in custody for 42 days and could not attend the classes. The petitioner seems to have approached the respondent. On his representation, he was re-admitted to the course on 4.11.2009. Later the petitioner was allowed to appear in the practical examination in which Roll number was issued to him but he was not allowed to appear in the final examination of 3rd Semester due to shortage of lectures. It is under these circumstances, the petitioner filed this petition seeking direction to issue him Roll Number for appearance in the final examination of 3rd Semester. In view of the reply filed by the respondents, it is stated that as against the total delivered 460 lectures, the petitioner attended only 208 i.e. 45.22% where as minimum requirement is 70%. The petitioner was CWP No.20078 of 2009 detained in FIR No.146 under Sections 363, 366, 376 and 120-B IPC registered at Police Station, Kanina, District Mohindergarh. Admittedly, the petitioner has shortage of more than 50% lectures. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that shortage of lectures is not attributable to the petitioner and is beyond his control. This contention of the petitioner cannot be accepted. The petitioner was involved in the criminal offence and remained in custody. He is not entitled to any benefit. No indulgence can be shown to the petitioner for condoning the lectures. I find no merit in this petition. Accordingly, petition stands Dismissed. [ Permod Kohli ] Judge 22.04.2010 sd 2