IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.10326 of 2011 Date of Decision : July 08, 2011. Virender Kumari .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Paramjit Singh Jammu, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a direction to grant her the notional appointment w.e.f. 11.12.2006 when the candidates lower in merit were given appointment but she was denied the same for want of alleged recognition of her qualification. The petitioner has to approach this Court in CWP No.19011 of 2006 and pursuant to the directions issued therein, she was finally given appointment in the year 2009. The petitioner accordingly prays for a direction to grant her appointment w.e.f. 11.12.2006 when her juniors were given appointment. In this regard, the petitioner is said to have made a representation dated 16.11.2010 (Annexure P-4) but there appears to be no CWP No.10326 of 2011 [2] response so far. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the above mentioned claim of the petitioner and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. It is further directed that in case the petitioner's claim is accepted, no salary or increments for the ante- dated period shall be given though the same shall be given notionally for the pay fixation. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 08, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE