IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH JANUARY 2010 / 16TH POUSHA 1931 RP.No. 8 of 2010() ------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.35130/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER/4TH RESPONDENT ----------------------------------------------- A.RAJASEKHAR, THENCOTTUPUTHEN VEEDU, PUNNAMUKKU, PERUMPUZHA, KUNDARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER T.K.RADHAKRISHNAN, S/O.LATE K.R.KRISHNA PILLAI, 'AMBADY', PERUMPUZHA, KUNDARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.SAJU.S.A RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. G.VASANTHAKUMARI AMMA, DEVI AUTOMOBILES, PUNNAMUKKU, KUNDARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. K.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR, DEVI AGENCIES, KUNDARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KOLLAM. 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TRANSMISSION CONSTRUCTION SUB DIVISION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, KUNDARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 5. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. ADV.ELVIN PETER G.P. SRI.T.T.MUHAMMED ADV.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== R.P.No. 8 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 6th day of January, 2010 O R D E R The 4th respondent in the writ petition has filed this review petition seeking review of my judgment dated 21.12.2009 in the writ petition on the ground that he had not been served with notice in the writ petition. Although in view of the circumstances obtaining, I am not quite satisfied with the reasons mentioned in the review petition, taking a lenient view, I allow the review petition since the petitioner had not been heard in the matter and recall my judgment dated 21.12.2009 restoring the writ petition to file. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2