1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No.1137 of 2006 Mrs.Varsha Vaibhav Haldankar Petitioner Vs. Mr.Vaibhav Chandrakant Haldankar Respondent Mr.K.S.Patil for petitioner. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. June 05, 2006. P.C. . Heard Mr.Patil, the learned counsel for the petitioner-wife who has filed Petition No.C-243 of 2003 for maintenance under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 and in the said petition an application for interim relief was moved. The learned Judge of the Family Court No.6, Mumbai, after hearing both the parties, has allowed the said application No.244 of 2004 by her order dated 12/9/2005 and directed to pay an amount of Rs.2000/- per month towards the maintenance of the petitioner-wife. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the husband has not paid the interim maintenance amount as directed by the impugned order and in any case the said amount of Rs.2000/- per month is not adequate enough to meet her day-to-day financial liabilities, though she is presently staying with her parents. 2 . It would be in the interest of the petitioner that Petition No.C-243 of 2003 is heard and decided expeditiously by the Family Court and in case the husband is not taking steps to comply with the interlocutory order dated 12/9/2005 passed by the Family Court, she has the remedy to get the said order executed by the Family Court. . The petition is hereby disposed off by directing the Family Court to hear and decide petition No.C-243 of 2003 on its own merits as expeditiously as possible but preferably within a period of six months on receipt of the writ from this Court. (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)