1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.3045 of 2007 (Smt. Firoza Begum w/o Yunus Sheikh and others v. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Ms M.M. Shesh, Advocate for Petitioners. Smt. T.D. Khade, AGP for Respondents No.1 and 2. Shri N.W. Sambre, Advocate for Respondent No.4 Coram : A.H. Joshi & R.C. Chavan, JJ. Dated : 13 th July, 2007 1. We had issued notice. The learned AGP states that the Returning Officer is present in Court. Upon instructions from the Returning Officer, the learned AGP submits as follows : (i) That in conformity with Rule 56U of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, which applies to the election for notified Societies, the names have been included in the voters' list by writing surname first. Therefore, there is no change in the name of petitioner in voters' list while describing petitioner No.1. 2 (ii) That the name of respondent No.2 has been wrongly described and the mistake is by writing the name of father of petitioner No.2 first in narration. This mistake is already corrected by corrigendum dated 7-7-2007, the copy whereof would be supplied to petitioner No.2. 2. In view of these submissions, the grievance of the petitioners is partly met. Other challenges cannot be gone into in a writ petition at this stage when voting is at the threshold. 3. The petition, therefore, does not call for any indulgence and is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE. Pdl.