1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4671 OF 2009 (Vitthalrao K. Pillewar vs. Assistant Registrar, Coop. Society & Ors.) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4689 OF 2009 (Namdeorao B. Dongre vs. Assistant Registrar, Coop. Society & Ors.) AND WRIT PETITION NO. 4808 OF 2009 (Shri Kishor R. Ganjiwale vs. Assistt. Registrar, Coop. Society & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DECEMBER 08, 2009. Heard Shri Deshpande, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Fulzele, learned AGP for respondent No.1 and Shri Dhurvey, learned counsel for respondents No.2 & 3. The matter is being considered by this Court since 26.11.2009. I have heard learned counsel on 27.11.2009, 5,12.2009 and thereafter today. The contention of the petitioners is that they are not aware of the loan sanctioned to them by their society i.e. Respondent No.4 and it is being pointed out that they have paid some amount to respondent No.4. Shri Dhurvey, learned counsel has pointed out that society itself has communicated to the petitioners that each of them have been given loan of Rs. 67,000/- and he further states that the petitioners must have executed necessary documents in favour of 2 Respondent No.4 – society for said loan. Shri Fulzele, learned AGP as also Shri Dhurvey, learned counsel pointed out that remedy of filing revision under Section 154 of Maharashtra Co- operative Societies Act, 1960, is available to the petitioners. Shri Deshpande, learned counsel has placed reliance upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Ganeshkumar Makhanlal Chandak vs. Nagpur Urban Coop. Bank Ltd., reported at 2005 (2) ALL MR 392, to contend that the principles of natural justice should have been followed before issuing any RRC in the matter by Respondent No.2. It is apparent that Respondent No.3 - Maharashtra State Cooperative Housing Finance Corporation Ltd., has released loan to Respondent No.4 - Society for its members. The petitioners before this Court are those members. They have availed of loan and have constructed their house and they are duty bound to pay necessary installments to the society. The principal amount of loan as communicated to the petitioners by society is Rs.67,000/- each. The petitioners claim that they have obtained this information under Right to Information Act. These petitioners are the members who have borrowed loan from Respondent No.4 – Society and now express ignorance of the loan amount. The facts show that they have still not completed payment of Rs. 67,000/- itself which is principal amount. The conduct 3 of the petitioners, therefore, show that they are not approaching this Court with clean hands. The judgment on which reliance has been placed is, therefore, not helpful to them. Moreover, the petitioners have got equally efficacious remedy of revision under Section 154 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, before the Divisional Joint Registrar. I am not inclined to interfere in writ jurisdiction in present petitions. Writ Petitions are, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.