THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 9575 OF 2010 Dated 26th April, 2010 Between: K.Anjaneyulu Goud and two others …Petitioner And The Commissioner and two others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri M.Damodar Reddy Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Prohibition and Excise The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside proceedings dated 09.02.2010 of respondent No.3, whereby he cancelled the TFT licenses of the petitioners pertaining to Bijinapally Village and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District, as confirmed by order dated 25.02.2010 passed by respondent No.2. At the hearing, Sri M.Damodar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that while inspection of Counter No.1 was stated to have been conducted and toddy sold from the said counter was found adulterated, there is absolutely no justification to cancel licences in respect of Shop Nos.2 and 3 belonging to petitioners 2 and 3. I am, however, not inclined to adjudicate upon this aspect in view of the admitted fact that the Second Appeal filed by the petitioners against the abovementioned two orders of respondents 2 and 3 is pending before respondent No.1. In my opinion, the petitioners are not entitled to invoke parallel remedies. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.1 to dispose of the petitioners’ Second Appeal, if not already done, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP No.12346 of 2010 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 26th April, 2010 vrn