IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2010 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 36715 of 2010(L) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- SOUMYA THERES SAJAN (MINOR), STANDARD IX, FATIMA GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL, FORT KOCHI, KOCHI-682001, REP. BY HER FATHER SAJAN ANTONY ADVOCATE AGED 45, S/O. LATE V.J.ANTONY, C.C. NO.10/792, VELASSERY HOUSE, AMARAVATHY, FORTKOCHI, KOCHI-682001. BY ADV. SMT.JAYASREE MANOJ RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE FOR MATTANCHERRY SUB-DISTRICT SCHOOL, KALOLSAVAM 2010-2011, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL CONVENOR, ST. MARY'S ANGLO INDIAN GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL, FORT KOCHI, KOCHI-682001. 2. THE APPELLATE COMMITTEE MATTANCHERRY SUB-DISTRICT SCHOOL, KALOLSAVAM 2010-2011, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER, THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MATTANCHERRY. 3. THE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE FOR ERNAKULAM REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOL, KALOLSAVAM 2010-2011, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL CONVENER, DEPUTY EDUCATION OFFICER, ERNAKULAM. R2 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 36715 of 2010 L ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 9th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is a 9th standard student in Fatima Girls High School, Fort Kochi. In the Sub District School Kalolsavam 2010-2011, petitioner participated in three items including Mohiniyattom and Folk Dance. She is aggrieved by the results of these two items and filed Exts.P10 and P11 appeals. These appeals were rejected by Exts.P1 and P2 orders. As a result of the above, petitioner will not be eligible to participate in the Revenue District Kalolsavam which is scheduled to start on 11-12-2010. It is in these circumstances, this writ petition is filed. 2. In so far as the Mohiniyattom is concerned, the complaint raised by the petitioner is that because of the piercing light provided on the stage, she could not perform well. In so far as Folk Dance is concerned, she says the improper audio system affected her performance badly. W.P.(C) No.36715/10 : 2 : However, a reading of Exts.P1 and P2 appellate orders show that all the participants performed on the very same stage and no other participant had raised complaints like the petitioner. It is, therefore, found that there is no substance in the grievance raised. 3. First of all, if as stated in the appellate orders, all participants have performed in the very same stage with the very same facilities, no prejudice could have been caused to the petitioner. Such being the case, I do not find any good reason to accept the plea raised by the petitioner to upset the assessment done by the experts in the field. Writ petition fails and it is dismissed. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge