,^'<-~... Petitioner Resoondents H16H COURT OF CHHAmSSARH: BIIASPUR Wrtt Petitton (Sl No. 7423 of 2007 Ku. Rameshwari Verma, D/o. Shri Kartikrarn Verma, agedabout 2) years, resident of Village Jan/oy, Poiice Station Bhilal -3, Tahsil Dhamdha, Distrlct Duig (CG). Versus 1) Nagar Palika Parishad, Bhitai-Charatria, District Durg (CG). 2) The Districl Project Offioer, int^rated, Unified Women and Chitd Bevelopme'nt Project, Duig (CG). 3) The Project Officer, Integrated Uniiied Women and Child De\®lopmentProject, Bhilai, Bistrict Durg (CG). 4) .State of Chhattisgarh, through tts Secretary, Department of Women and Child Dewlopment D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 5) The Coltector, Duig, Distrtct Duig(CG). . 6) Laxmi Sahu wifeof Rajendra Kumar Sahu, aged atiput 34 yeare, resident of Village Jarvoy Pottee Station Bhilai - 3, Tahsil Dhamdha, Di^rict kDuig (CG). (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitutton of Irriia.) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Presente Shri M.K. Bhacjuri, counset for the petitioner, Shri SatishGupta, Govt. Advocatefor the State. ORAL ORDER (Passedon 4-3^008) Leamed counsel appearing for the petltioner sutxnits that the appointment of the respondent No.6 on the post of Angan Badi Worker for village Jarwy, Bhilai - 3, Tahsil Dhamdha, Dist. Duig, Is contraryto the Angan Badi Scheme and law. 2) Be that as It may, the disputed question of facts are invotved in this matter, interest ofjustice wouid be subseryed, If Bie present dlsput®are reterred to the ^- Dlstrict Collector for decision after providing opportunity of hearing to the conoemed parties. Leamed oounsel for the parties have no objection. 3$ Accordingly, the matter is referred back to the Qillector, Durg, for adjudicatlon in accordance with taw on its own merit, expeditlousty. 4) In view of theabove, the petitlon stands disposed of. Sd/- , .,, \ SattehK.Agnihotn ;