CW 10681/09 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10681/09 Harnath Regar Versus State & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 07/10/2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Hari Kishan Saini, for petitioner *** Instant petition has been filed by petitioner who is presently working as Teacher Gr.III and posted in Government Upper Primary School, Tejpura, Panchayat Samiti Arai, District Ajmer. With multi-fold grievance against respondent No.5 who is presently working as Headmaster in Government Upper Primary School, Kadela, Tehsil Kekri, District Ajmer. It appears from the record that earlier the petitioner approached this court by filing CWP-6427/02 and pending petition, he was transferred within Tehsil Kekri from Alamboo to Undari. But, it appears that some of his grievance against the then Headmaster who is respondent No.5 in the instant petition, could not have been settled. As such, while disposing of writ petition on 23rd September, 2002, this court observed that he may make representation CW 10681/09 [2] which will be examined/considered by the authority in accordance with law. In compliance of the order of this court, the petitioner submitted representation which was decided para- wise by the District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Ajmer vide order dt.20th December, 2003 [Ann.10]. After filing of the writ petition, this court directed the petitioner to file additional affidavit pointing out his grievance which he wants to be adjudicated by this Court. In compliance thereto, additional affidavit has been filed and in Para 3-6 the petitioner has raised certain grievances about functioning of the institution and in regard to the work undertaken by the Headmaster from him under whom he had worked. These are not such disputes which are required to be adjudicated under the jurisdiction of this Court U/Art.226 of the Constitution since it does not in any manner infringe his legal or statutory right conferred under Rules. CW 10681/09 [3] His basic grievance is against respondent No.5 and to be more particular about his action in taking work from the petitioner. But as informed to this court and as evident from title of the writ petition that Headmaster is not posted in the institution where the petitioner is presently serving. There is otherwise no lis between the petitioner & respondent No.5 and such disputes/grievance which he has raised by filing of additional affidavit, it is expected that the petitioner will settle all such personal disputes at his own level which does not require adjudication in writ jurisdiction of this Court U/Art.226 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, this court find no substance in the writ petition and with the above observations, the petition stands disposed of. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA10681CW09 7-10.doc