IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 229 OF 2010 MR. JOHN RALINO FERNANDES ... Petitioner Versus MRS. BERTHA VAS, W/O FRANCIS VAS., ... Respondent Mr. V. A. Lawande, Advocate for the Petitioner. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 30th March, 2010 P.C.: Heard Shri Lawande, learned Counsel on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is the plaintiff in RCS No.75/09/C, which was filed by the plaintiff on 18/08/2009. Counsel on behalf of the petitioner/plaintiff submits that the plaintiff had also filed along with the suit an application for interim relief. The plaintiff filed another application for interim relief on 25/11/2009. The same was decided by the learned trial Court in favour of the plaintiff against which the defendant filed an appeal before the learned District Court. The District Court has remanded the matter with a direction to the learned trial Court to decide both the applications together. In the light of that, in my view, the order of the learned District Judge need not be interfered with in supervisory jurisdiction. There is no doubt that the learned trial Court will decide both the applications on its own merits and without being influenced by any observations which might have been made by the learned Additional District Judge. Further, it is needless to observe that if both the applications are to be decided by the learned trial Judge at one time, the status quo order earlier granted by the trial Court would remain in force, till both applications are decided. 3. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH