IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 36 OF 2005 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 3705 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 371 OF 2002 The State of Maharashtra ..... ........ . Applicant. V/s D.D. Jagtap...... . .. ..... ...... Respondent Mr.A.P. Vanarse with Mr.S.R. Nargolkar, AGP for the applicant. None for the respondents. CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. 21.10.2005. PC: Request for adjournment is rejected. Heard Shri Vanarse on merits. The impugned order passed is under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Appeal against such order is not tenable under clause 15 of Letters Patent Appeal. Mere mention of Article 226 cannot create a right in the litigant to choose the Forum or create a right to an appeal. Hence appeal is dismissed. 21.10.05