© 6 IN THE HON'BLE HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION (Sl N0 ATBILASPURr"$^, 2011 PETITIONER :^Shiv Kumar Patel, S/o. Late Shri Roinanchal Patel, aged about 48 years, R/o. Housing Board Colony, Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.&.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^l. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: - Secretary, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) <'2. Director, Revenue Department, Raipur (C.G.) .f^Qf . \..%y / ^ 3. Commissioner Bilaspur Division, ^7A^ -"'"' BU.s^cZl~~""r"~ "'"""' BUaspur(C.G.) 4. Collector, Land Record, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (C.G.) ^w^y / ss'f -.< r->A/^ ^y^ / »* -\ / .••'.£?' ,•" ^^ / \ A?'^'. / > • ' .. ; • ' c .^<f ,y WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE '^ "---i--"^_^J_^2l_'—-—- CONSITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OFTHEPETITIONERfS) As inentioned in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENT(S) As mentioned above in the cause title. ^;r?;'^'^§^S%?;^£-''?'%'i;s^"s 4siss^^ Aniit p HIGH COIJRT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BII.A8PIJR PETmONER WMT PETmON (S) No. 51 17 of2011 Shiv Kumar Patel. RESPONDENT8 VF.RSIJ8 State ofChhattisgaA & Ofliers. WRFT PRTmON IJNDRR^ARTICT ,P, 226 OF THR GQNSTmmON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satiah K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri SaurabhDangi, Advocateforthepetitioner. Shri V.V.S. Moorihy, Deputy Advuyale Geniiral for (he State/respondents. Shri S.P. Nawataa, Dy. Conunissioner (R), Bilaspur, is presenl. PRI»I<;R<ORAJ,) (Passed on 06n day of September, 2011) 1. At the very outset, Shri Moorfliy, leamed coiuisel appearing for the State/respondente, on instructions, swbmits tfaat the order dated 12.08.2011 (Amiexiire P/l) impugaed herein, has not been passed by a competent authority in accordance with Rule 20, Pnrt II, of tfie Madhya Pradesh/Chfaattisgarh Laad Record Manual, thus, the same is ii&sustainable in law and shall not be given effect to. 2. In view of the above siibniissicn made by leamed State eounsel, accordine to leamed couiisel for the petitioner, nottung snrvives for adjudication atthis stage. 3. Aecordingly, the impugned order dated 12.08.2011 (Annexiire P/l) is qugshed. However, liberty is reswved to the State/responetents to pass appiopnate order, if so a^vised, in accordaace with law, in adniimstrBtive exigency and in pubiio interest. 4. The yvrit petition is allowed. No order asto coste. ^jr"