1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1442 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1442 OF 2011 *** 1. Heard Advocate Mr. Talhar for the Petitioner, learned A.G.P. for Respondent No, 2. Learned A.G.P. points out order impugned is judgment of School Tribunal delivered in the year 2007. Shri Talhar states that writ petition is already filed by management challenging that judgment along with Petitioner and that writ petition is admitted and is pending for final hearing. He states that the petitioner, however, is co- petitioner in that petition in his capacity as Head Master and apprehends that his individual grievance may not be looked into. His contention is that if that petition is dismissed, present petitioner stands chance to lose his post as Head Master and hence by way of abundant precaution present petition has been filed. He contends that present writ petition should be admitted and heard 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1442 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. along with earlier petition. 3. I do not see any just and sufficient reason for entertaining a petition after four years. Not only this, the apprehensions of petitioner are not correct. He is already before this Court and he can assail impugned order of School Tribunal on all grounds. Petition is without any merit. Rejected. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:25/03/2011. ans/1442