1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1642 of 2007. Shankar Shripat Bhelawe and others. ..vs.. State of Maharashtra and others. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Sanjay Tambulkar, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.A.S.Fulzele, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 and 3. Mr.S.K.Mishra, Adv. for respondent no.4. Mr.Shashikant Borkar, Adv. for respondent no.2 Coram: ANOOP V. MOHTA and C. L. PANGARKAR,JJ. Dated : 13th August, 2008 The petitioner by this petition has challenged the action of the respondents for non-consideration of his case though he worked for more than four years. Respondents no.1 and 2 in their reply dated 22/8/2007 have pointed out clause of Government Resolution dated 13/4/1998, which reads as under - “Nirantar Shikshan Kendra Prerak has to 2 work honararily as social work and such Shikshan Kendra Prerak has no right to claim to work as permanent.” Even otherwise on the date of advertisement the petitioner was overage therefore also, there was no question of considering the case of the petitioner as prayed. Taking all these into account, there is no substance in this petition. It is dismissed accordingly. JUDGE. JUDGE. chute