IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.271 of 2009 1.Brahmdeo Mandal 2.Gopal Mandal 3.Lal Bahadur Mandal 4.Shiv Shankar Mandal All sons of Ram Chandra Mandal 5.Amarendra Mandal @ Amarendra Deo 6.Narendra Mandal @ Narendra Deo Sons of Shahdeo Mandal, all residents of village Makasaspur, Koiri Tola, P.S. Kashim Bazar, District- Munger ……….. Petitioners Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2.The Collector, Munger, District- Munger 3.Sub-Divisional Officer, Munger, District- Munger 4.Kashim son of Late Aziz 5.Dablu @ Sarwar son of Matiurddin 6.Pappu Nayar son of Md.Pauhi 7.Sonu son of Suleman @ Sulo 8.Hassan son of Late Abul 9.Lado son of Md.Jainullah 10.Bablu son of Md.Alim 11.Nato son of Md.Gulam Rasool All residents of village Khankah Makasaspur, P.S. Kashim Bazar, District- Munger …………. Respondents ----------- 7. 20/04/2010 Apparently, petitioners have rushed to this Court only upon receiving a notice of a proceeding under section 144 Cr.P.C. and also a notice of a proceeding under section 107 Cr.P.C. It is admitted that the petitioners have not filed their show cause to either of the two notices. This Court does not appreciate the approach of the petitioners. It is submitted that there is already a - 2 - judgment and decree of competent civil court in favour of petitioners in respect of the land in dispute. Inspite of that, respondents are creating trouble on the land and are tying to forcibly erect boundary wall on the same. If that is so, it is always open to the petitioners to file their reply taking the ground of title and possession decided by the competent court and produce the documents for consideration of learned Magistrates with a prayer to drop the proceedings. Petitioners have not done so. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners will file reply to the show cause in the court concerned within the shortest possible time, but till then, interim protection may be given to the petitioners from threatened dispossession. This writ application was filed on 18.3.2009 and since then it was heard on merits on many dates. Petitioners do not appear to have pressed for any interim order. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to pass any affirmative order in favour of the petitioners. It is expected that if the petitioners - 3 - will file reply to the show cause notices, the court concerned shall take up the matter expeditiously, consider their reply and conclude the proceedings at an early date. However, this writ application is dismissed as misconceived. Pradeep/ ( J.N. Singh, J.)