IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19808 of 2010 MD.NAUSHAD @ MD.NAUSHADI . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 16.06.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner who is the husband of the complainant is in custody in connection with Complaint Case No.191(C) of 2009 for offences punishable under Sections 323 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to an application filed by the petitioner dated 22.4.2009 placed at Annexure-2 of the application, submits that the complainant went away from his house in his absence on 21.4.2009 and information whereof was given to the officer-in-charge of the local police station. Learned counsel with reference to a proceeding of the Local Panchayat placed at Annexure-3, further submits that efforts were made by the Panchayat for resolution of the dispute between the parties but the girl and 2 her family refused to come to a settlement, rather the complainant refused to stay with the petitioner. Learned counsel thus submits that the petitioner had taken all efforts to bring back the girl to her matrimonial home but she has refused to come along with him and in this background his case deserves consideration. Having regard to the circumstances aforesaid, let the petitioner namely, Md.Naushad @ Md. Naushadi be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura (Munger) in connection with Complaint Case No. 191 (C) of 2009. Before parting with the order, I would like to observe that the Court in seisen of the matter should make all possible efforts for resolution of the dispute between the contesting parties. Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)