IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2011 / 21ST ASWINA 1933 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2855 of 2009() ------------------------------ CRA.648/2007 of II ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, KOLLAM CC.18/2006 OF JFCM-IV, PUNALUR. .................... REVN. PETITIONERS/APPELLANT/ACCUSED ---------------------------------------------------------------- LATHIKA. B., ERATHU VEEDU, KARAMKODE PO, ULIYANADU, KOLLAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.V.VENUGOPALAN NAIR RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. S.SIVASWAMI IYER, VADAKKEDATHU MADAM, PANAYAM CHERRY, ANCHAL PO, KOLLAM. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. T.R. RAJESH. R2 BY ADV. BINNI KAMAL THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: AMG S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J -------------------------------------- Crl.R.P No.2855 OF 2009 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of October 2011 ORDER Composition of the offence requested for by the parties to the proceedings, the accused and the complainant, moving an application jointly under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was tentatively allowed on terms directing payment of cost fixed to the Kerala State Legal Service Authority. Counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is unable to pay the cost and therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw the revision. The order tentatively allowing composition of the offence shall stand vacated as the condition imposed thereof has not been complied with. Acceding to the request, permission is granted, and the revision is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- vdv S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE //True Copy// P.A to Judge