IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 344 OF 2000 SHRI SHRIKANT M.DESAI ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA & ORS. ... Respondent Ms W.Coutinho,Govt. Advocate for the respondent Nos.1 To 3. Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 25th March, 2008 P.C. None present for the petitioner. Ms W. Coutinho, Govt. Advocate present for the respondents. Even earlier order disclosed that the petitioner had failed to appear in the matter on 6th March 2006 and 22th March, 2006 and, therefore, the petition was dismissed for default. Subsequently, in view of the application for restoration being allowed, the petition was restored to the board. However, when the matter was called out on 5th March, 2008, none appeared for the petitioner, therefore, in order to give opportunity to the petitioner the matter was adjourned till this date but still none present for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner does not have interest in the matter. The petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. Rule stands discharged. No order as to costs. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. SMA