IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10641 of 2010 1. SIYAWATI DEVI 2. Rama Kant Yadav 3. Shashi Kant Yadav Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 4/ 29.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Marriage appears for the complainant as a business in which allegation is about investing of Rs. 10,00,000/- while it is admitted that earlier a case under Section 498A and other allied sections of the I.P.C. was filed in which this issued was also raised. Divorce is allowed to the petitioner though ex parte appears not a case in which anticipatory bail petition can be refused. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 658 of 2009/Tr. No. 2952 of 2009 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M., Ist Class, Jhanjharpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)