IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4290 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: February 07, 2011 Arun Kumar .. Petitioner Vs. Ashok Kumar and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. K.B. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jaswant Jain, Advocate for the respondents. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 2.6.2010 (Annexure P1) passed by the trial court allowing the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC filed by the respondent. The trial court while passing the impugned order did not take into consideration the judgment delivered by the Apex Court in case Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh vs. Randhir Singh and others, 2010 (2) CCC 0510 obviously for the reason that this judgment was not delivered at that time. As such, the trial court requires to decide the question of court fee as per the settled principle as laid down in the aforesaid judgment. Consequently, this petition is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the trial court is directed to decide the question of court fee on the principle as laid down by the Apex Court in Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh's case (supra). February 07, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge