IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 2019 of 2008 Between: Madhava Chary, S/o. Anantha Chary, R/o. Attapur Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2 The Tahsildar/Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajendranagar Mandal, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 and 2 is not disposing of Petitioners application in File No. D5/2344/2003, is bad in the eye of law, and direct the respondents 1 and 2, the early disposal of the same. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.S.PERVAIZ Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not disposing of the petitioner’s application in File No.D5/2344/2003. The petitioner claims that the land in Survey No.354/2 of Attapur Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District is his ancestral property. As per the sethwar of Attapur Village, the said survey number admeasuring Ac.0.39 guntas is recorded in the name of his ancestor and also the fee of temple in the same was exempted. Though the petitioner states that the subject matter of land belongs to him, no material is produced before the Court to prove the same. Further under what provision of law the petitioner has applied to the respondents is also not stated. Only on the information provided by the learned Government Pleader, it came to light that the petitioner has preferred a revision petition before the Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District and that the same is still pending. It is unfortunate to note that the affidavit of the petitioner does not contain any information or material to substantiate his case and the counsel for the petitioner also has not made any effort to impress this Court to the relief sought for. Recording the displeasure, the following order is passed without going into the merits of the case. In the circumstances, the Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District is directed to dispose of the revision petition filed by the petitioner expeditiously. With the above direction the writ petition is disposed of. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.24.6.2008 msv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2 The Tahsildar/Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajendranagar Mandal, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District. 3 Two CCs to Govt.Pleader for Revenue, High Court of A.P. Hyd. 4 2 CD copies.