IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 16122 of 2008 Between: M.Noor Ahmed, S/o. M.Mehboob Saheb, R/o. Yemmigannur Town, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND The Revenue Divisional Officer, Adoni, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner similarly with that of other cases of the dealers whose cases were dealt by imposing penality by issuing proceedings Rc.M.100/2008 dated 03.06.2008 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent to restore the authorization of the petitioner and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.V.RAGHU VEER Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES This Court made the following, at the stage of admission: ORAL ORDER: The authorization of the petitioner in respect of the Shop No.28, 13th Ward of Yemmiganur Town, Adoni Division, Kurnool District, has been suspended on 22.2.2008. He has not preferred any appeal thereagainst to the Joint Collector. He challenges the order of suspension pending enquiry passed by the respondent. However at the stage of admission hearing, the petitioner requests that a direction be issued to the respondent to conclude the main enquiry itself, expeditiously. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself, after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies. The substantive relief specifically sought in the writ petition namely; invalidation of the order of suspension dated 22.2.2008, is rejected. The respondent shall however conclude the enquiry into the allegations, which led to the order of impugned suspension and pass final orders thereon, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. GODA RAGHURAM, J Date: 25.7.2008 cvm