IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 29TH AUGUST 2008 / 7TH BHADRA 1930 RP.No. 923 of 2008(F) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.4676/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER ---------------------------------- LAKSHMI R. NAIR W/O. RAMACHANDRAN, MYDAN VILLA, HINDU MISSION ROAD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1 BY ADV. SRI.SANTHAN V.NAIR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR COLLECTORATE, VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 3. THE SPL.TAHASILDAR (LA) PWD (SOUTHERN CIRCLE) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY G.P. SRI.BASANTH BALAJI THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,J. ------------------------ R.P. NO.923/2008 IN W.P.(C)No.4676/2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 29th day of August, 2008 O R D E R I do not find any warrant for invocation of the jurisdiction of this court for reviewing its own judgment or order under Order 47 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure in this case. Sri.Santhan V.Nair, the learned counsel for the review petitioner would submit today also that the award is not under challenge and that the challenge is against the award notice. I had referred to this challenge in my judgment and decision was taken on the basis of the judicial precedents referred to therein. It appears to me that the essential grievance of the petitioner is that in Ext.P3 names of other persons are also mentioned as awardees and that it is not able to make out from Ext.P3 exactly as to what is the amount which is being offered to the petitioner. I dismiss the review petition. However, it is made clear that it is always be open for the petitioner to approach the land acquisition officer for a copy of the full text of the award. (PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE) dpk