IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 8435 of 2011 Date of Decision : October 11, 2011 Dharam Pal … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others … Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Pushpinder Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. K. B. Khajuria, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R. K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for respondents-State. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:- (A) That this writ petition may kindly be allowed, writ in the nature of mandamus may be issued and the respondent department may be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner in a time bound manner and post him at one of station of his choice as per the transfer policy of the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Annexure P-1, representation is pending consideration before the second respondent. There will be a direction to the third respondent to take a decision on the representation Annexure P-1 in accordance with policy within a period of one month from the 2 date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the third respondent. 3. Writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. October 11, 2011 (PK/C)