IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2010 / 26TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 2800 of 2010(Y) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ ANIL.K.N, AGED 41 YEARS, JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT, PERFORMANCE AUDIT UNIT IV, PERAMBRA, KOZHIKODE. BY ADVS. SRI.M.SASINDRAN, SRI.V.VENUGOPAL. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. VIJAYAKUMARI.L, JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT, KANNUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (C) No. 2800 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Junior Superintendent presently working in the audit unit IV, Perambra in Kozhikode District. According to the petitioner, he was included in Ext.P2 queue list at Sl.No.21. His grievance is that the 3rd respondent whose name is not at all included in Ext.P2 queue list has been given transfer to the office of the Deputy Director of Panchayath, Kannur. According to the petitioner, this is a clear violation of the norms in Ext.P4. The contention of the petitioner is that in case the order of transfer is not set aside, it would entail the loss of his station seniority. 2. A statement has been filed in this writ petition by the first respondent. As per the same, the petitioner in Ext.P2 is holding rank No.13. Further it is stated therein that Ext.P4 Government Order has been subsequeuently modified as per Ext.R1(a). During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has produced the objection dated 5.3.2010(Ext.P2) filed against the draft transfer list(Ext.P6). According to the WPC.No.2800 of 2010 : 2 : petitioner, his name is not included in Ext.P6 draft seniority list. However, Ext.P6, calls for objections against Ext.P6 from the aggrieved employees. In terms of the said liberty granted as per Ext.P6, Ext.P7 has been filed by the petitioner. 3. In this circumstances, the first respondent is directed to consider Ext.P7 objection filed by the petitioner against Ext.P6 draft seniority list expeditiously. While considering Ext.P7, the first respondent shall also look into the grievances of the petitioner raised therein against Ext.P3. The first respondent shall consider and pass orders as directed above expeditiously, at any rate, before the finalization of Ext.P6 draft seniority list. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge