IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.9730 of 2009 1. MD.MANSUR, s/o Taslim 2. Sahida Khatoon w/o Mustak 3. Tetari Khatoon w/o Md. Hassan 4. Aaisa Khatoon @ Ayasna Khatoon w/o Md. Taslim 5. Ganauri Khatoon w/o Mansur All are resident of village – Birit, P.S. – Madhwapur, Distt. – Madhubani ................................................... Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ....................... Opp. Party ----------- 2 22.05.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are brother-in-laws, married sister-in-laws and mother- in-law and sister-in-law (Gotani) of the complainant. Counsel for the petitioners submits that in the complaint case there is no specific allegation against the husband. The allegation is that after the husband of the complainant has returned from Bombay earning a lot of money, the accused persons have been demanding it. It is submitted that no offence under Section 498 A is made out. Considering the fact, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioners, namely, Md.Mansur, Sahida Khatoon, Tetari Khatoon, Aaisa Khatoon @ Ayasna Khatoon and Ganauri Khatoon are allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, the petitioners above named, will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court S. Singh, Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, in connection with C.R. No. 378 of 2008 corresponding to T.R. No. 3212 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Kundan (Mridula Mishra, J.)