IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.37268-M of 2010 Date of Decision:18.1.2011 Ramandeep Kaur and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Ms. Niti Wadhawan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. Jasjeet Singh, Advocate for respondents No.6 and 7. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 5 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and also directing respondents No.6 and 7 not to interfere in the personal lives of the petitioners. Petitioners are present in the Court. Upon notice, respondents No.6 and 7 are present in the Court alongwith their respective counsel. It is stated by the learned counsel for respondents No.6 and 7 that the real name of petitioner No.1, who is present in the Court is Sarabjit Kaur and not Ramandeep Kaur. On the asking, it is stated by petitioner No.1 is that she is also known by the name of Ramandeep Kaur. It is requested that her name be accordingly also read as Ramandeep Kaur @ Sarabjit Kaur. At this stage, it does not appear that there is any mala fide in mentioning her name as Ramandeep Kaur in the petition in stead of Sarabjit Crl. M. No.37268-M of 2010 -2- Kaur. However, it is admitted that petitioner No.1 is the daughter of respondent No.6 and she is married to petitioner No.2. Fact remains that Respondent No.6 and his wife i.e. mother of petitioner No.1 i.e. Ramandeep Kaur @ Sarabjit Kaur who are present in the Court, do not appear to be happy from the said marriage. Accordingly, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur, is directed to make sure that the petitioners are not physically harmed in any manner and take necessary measures in accordance with law, if threat perception still exists. Copy of the order be given dasti under the signature of Court Reader. 18.1.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE