IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8696 of 2009 CHANDAN YADAV, son of Lal Babu Yadav, resident of village Khutaha, P.S. Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case under Sections 341, 342, 323, 307, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is omnibus and general in nature, as it is stated in the F.I.R. that after the firing made by one co-accused Lalu Paswan, the other accused persons had injured the informant by knife. It is further stated by learned counsel that the petitioner has been made an accused on the basis of the statement made by co-accused Shyam Paswan, who was caught on the spot and thereafter the fardbeyan has been given falsely implicating the accused persons. It is further stated that the injury report does not support the case of the informant. Learned counsel also states that the two co-accused persons, namely, Shyam Paswan and Manoj Sahni have already been released on bail by the orders of this Court dated 23.12.2008 and 8.12.2008 respectively in Cr. Misc. No.51926/2008 and Cr.Misc.No.35594/2008. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case the petitioner ( Chandan Yadav ) is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 28 of 2008. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.)