: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3580 OF 2006 Riyaz Ahmed Yusuf Mokashi .. ..Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. ..Respondent Mrs.Nasrren Ayubi for applicant Mr.Y.M.Naskhwa, APP for State Mr.P.D.Gharat for CBI. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 5TH DECEMBER, 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard Mrs.Ayubi, Advocate appointed for the applicant, who has forwarded this application through jail and Shri Gharat for CBI. 2. Shri Gharat points out that Special Case in which the applicant accused is arrested for the offence of forgery and fake court fee stamps has been clubbed along : 2 : with other Special Case and he is presently being tried by the learned Special Judge, Bombay. 3. Upon perusal of the application and hearing the learned advocates, in my view, the applicant has applied for being enlarged on bail only on the ground that the trial has not concluded. Mr.Gharat informs me that about 24 witnesses have been examined in one Special Case and about 34 witnesses in Special Case No.112 of 2004. In such circumstances, interest of justice would be subserved if the present application is disposed of by granting liberty to the applicant to revive his application for bail in case the trial is not concluded within a period of six months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. The application is disposed of. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.)