1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of | coram, appearance, court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders | CONTEMPT PETITION NO.214/2008 Shri S.D.Joshi,Adv.for applicant. Shri M.S.Deshmukh,Adv.for R.1 & 2. .... CORAM : R.K.DESHPANDE,J. DATE : 23/11/2009. 1] This petition complains about wilful disobeidence of order/undertaking given by the respondents in Writ Petition No. 2705/06 recorded in the order dated 19/7/07. The relevant portion of the same is contained in para 3 of the order on page 27, which is reproduced below : "3] Affidavit in reply is filed by respondent no.6 wherein it is stated that the School Coordination Committee would take every care to advertise posts in relation to both the schools by showing social reservation as well as special reservation." 2 2] The respondents have issued an advertisement dated 24/5/2008 indicating reservation for the post of Shikshan Sevak for the category Physically Handicaped Persons as well as for Project Affected/Ex- Servicemen. Shri Joshi,learned counsel for petitioner has urged that the reservation as shown in the advertisement dated 24/5/08 is not in the manner specified in the undertaking which is reproduced above. He does not dispute that the advertisement shows social reservation as well as special reservation. However, his submission is that reservation is not in accordance with law. He has placed on record a chart, indicating the manner in which social reservation as well as special reservation has to be made in accordance with law. According to him, the manner in which the reservation is made in the advertisement dated 24/5/08 is therefore, contrary to the law laid down by the Apex Court. 3] It is not disputed that the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court on 19/7/2007 does not indicate the manner in which the reservation has to be done. The order of this Court cannot be read 3 to mean that the respondents are required to carry out the reservation in a particular manner. The correctness or otherwise of such reservation cannot be gone into in the contempt petition. It is a fact that the horizontal reservation has been made in the advertisement as stipulated in the order. The order passed by this Court is complied with. 4] In view of above, there is no substance in this petition. The same is therefore dismissed. (R.K.DESHPANDE, J.) umg/cp214-08