IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10169 of 2010 SHEO MURAT RAJBHAR SON OF LATE GATI RAJBHAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 22.7.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the first information report and subsequently his name transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused Vakil Singh Patil, who stated that after the victim was abducted he was taken to one Vijay Rajbhar and the present petitioner. Considering that there is active complicity of the petitioner disclosed in act of the kidnapping, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the serious nature of the offence. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )