1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.3637 of 2009 (Rajesh R. Chauhan and another v. Smt. Ratnamala V. Mogare and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri M.A. Bapat, Advocate for Petitioners. Coram : R.C. Chavan, J. Dated : 27 th August, 2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. This petition by the legal representatives of the original defendant No.1 in Special Civil Suit No.20 of 2002 is directed against the order rejecting their application for filing a pursis adopting the written statement filed by the original defendant No.1. Even without the pursis, the learned Trial Judge would obviously have to take into consideration the written statement filed by the original defendant No.1 and also see that the legal representatives, who step into the shoes of the original defendant No.1, do not take a different stand. Therefore, the learned Trial Judge should have allowed the application. But not allowing the said application is 2 unlikely to cause prejudice. The learned Trial Judge would bear in mind the observations made above. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. Judge. pdl