<u^\^ ^- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURTOFCHHATnSGARHATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION fSyNO. ^^38 OF 2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^^/•" ^^y^ "y ^s^ Sita Ram Sahu Son of Late Shri Dwarika Prasad Sahy, aged about 49 years, R/o Village and Post Hasua, Block Kasdol, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. * State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Director,Publiclnstruction,Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Raipur (C.G.) 4. 'District Education Officer, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (C.G.), Block Education Officer, Block Kasdol, District Raipur (C.G.). Rajendra Kumar Rakesh, aged about 48 years, Upper Division Teacher, at present working at Middle School, Baloda, Block Kasdol, DistrictRaipur(C.G.) Dilip Kumar Dewangan, Teacher S/o not known, a'ged abut not known, At present posted at Government Middle SchOol, Baloda (KatgD/Djstrict Raipur(C.G.) i4-l+i-i, ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -n.^^=TT-T <-^ AJJ—D. ^. HSGH GOURT OF CHHATTiSGA_RH : B1LASPUR '•VRIT PETITiON (S', N0.4315 OF 2COS PeTiTiOSsiER Smt. Jnender Lamfaa V€i3U3 State of Chhattisgarh & Others And > RSSPOsMDENTS W.P.iS) NOS.SS81. 5448, 5450, 5451. 5483.5484, 5485. 5SS4, 5753. 5735. 5793, 5805,5813, 581S, 5819, 5820,582S,5838, 5889, 5890, 5831, S018, S034,S204,6339, S340, 6423, 6438, S290, 5S18, 5533,S57S, 5S11, SSS1, 5SS1,5811,S817,5S27,5330,SS21 & SS22 of 2009. (Writ Pstitions under Articie 22S of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri H.B. Agrawai, Sr. Advocate with Ms Meera Jaiswal, Shri P.P. Sahu, Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Shri P.R. Patsnkar, Shri iVianoj Paranjape, Shri Uttam Pandey, Shri C.J.K. Rao, Shri Roop Naik, Shri A.S. Rajput, Shri K.S. Pawar, Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Shri R.R. Soni, Shri V.K. Pandey and Shri Ashwani Shukia, Advocates for the respective petitioners. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. Acivocate Generai for ths State of Chhattisgarh and its authorities. ORDER(ORALi (Passed on this 12th day of Novemoer, 2009) 1. Wilh the consent of learned counsel appearing tor the parties, the petitions are heard nnaiiy. 2. In this batch of matters it has been brought to the notice of the Court that {he transfer orders have been passed without conipiying with the policy and in some cases the orders having been executed aiso require reconsideration. 3. • Shri Thakur, iearned Dy. Advocate Generai appearing for the , State, on instructions, very fairiy submits that all the cases of the petitioners pendmg considerauon before this Court shaii be considered afresh, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, to examine asto whether th& transfer •ulALlJJl-. Oowri orders have been passed \n accordance with ths policy and tii! that time the petitioners herein shali not be disturbed. in vsew offoregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for the respective petitioners nothing survives in these petitions for adjudication. Accordlngiy, the petitions being W.P. (S) Nos.4315, 5981, 5448, 5450,5451, 5483, 5484, 548S, 5S84, 57K, 5785, 5783, S805, 5813, 5815,5818, 5320, 582S, 5839, 5889, 5890, 5891,^018, 5094,S2C4, S338,6340,6423, S438, 5290, 5518, 5533, 5578, 5S11, 5SS1, 5891, SS11, 5817, 5927, 5930, SS21 & SS22 of 2009 are csisposed of. However, on the basis of submission made by the iearned Dy. AdvocaSe Generai, it is made clear that the pelitioners herein shaii continue on their respective placss of postlng, as obtains today, tiii disposai of their respective cases, in accordance wsth iaw and on its own merits. No order asto costs. Sd/- _ ,, \ SatisbK.Agnib°tn JS^ •^£.