1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1905 OF 2009 Raghvendra Satyanarayan Kunte @ Raghu .. Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr.J.S.Padam for the applicant. Mr.J.P.Yagnik A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 28TH APRIL, 2009. DATED : 28TH APRIL, 2009. DATED : 28TH APRIL, 2009. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.153 of 2007 of D.C.B. C.I.D. Unit 5, Kurla, Mumbai. The said crime has been registered against the applicant and others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 489(a)(b)(c), 120-B r/w 34 of IPC. 3. It is the prosecution case that on 30th August, 2007, the applicant was found in possession of counterfeit currency notes of Rs.Two Lakhs. Mr.Padam, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that there are two panchnamas on the record and the timing 2 2 2 mentioned on both the panchnamas conflict with each other, which shows that both the panchnamas are false and fabricated documents. I have perused the material placed on record. Such argument, in my opinion, is not available at this stage of the proceedings. It is always open to the applicant to raise such contention during the trial. This court is informed that the trial has already commenced in the instant case. Keeping that all in view this application is rejected. . While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. . The application is disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)