1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9138 OF 2010 Malhari s/o Haibati Bhure & another .. PETITIONERS VERSUS Sambhaji s/o Kamaji Bhure & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. U.B. Bilolikar, advocate for the petitioners. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 5 th OCTOBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1 An application came to be tendered by the petitioners / plaintiffs seeking amendment to the plaint much after framing of issues and commencement of recording of evidence. By virtue of amendment, the plaintiffs want to incorporate the contentions those cannot be said to be not within the knowledge of the plaintiffs when the suit was presented. Trial court was justified in turning down the application. In exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, no interference is called for in the petition. Petition therefore stands rejected. 2 2 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp9138.10.odt