C l^ 1-sv, INTHE HIGHCOURT_OF^IUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH '.P.(S) No. ^ 3^- / ,/ •-''J/> y \iV. •v>v?-" ..• ^rSp ^•" ..•••'.P<'yi' y"d0'' ^•' ^.^ ^y ^- a, Distt. - Korba (C.6.) ^ ,^.0 i "'9 / 2. The District y,ffL' ,<4^^( ^ &is1-t. y 3. Assistant Commissioner, / [lil»i(n'fi'viKft'is^is^txwii.Kcfi^,. :.» ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA' y HE6H COURT OF CHHATT[S6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (5)No. 932 of 2007 Petitioner ; tojkumar Bharti Versus Reqiondents State of Chhcrttisgarh & others Shigle Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Mr. Amit Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the Petitioner. AAs. D4>al1 Pnndey, Par«lLowyer for •the State/respondents. OR&ER (Passed on 1his20rn Day of February, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel cppearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is workin9 <is Assistant Teacher. The petitioner has obtained B.Ed. Examination certificate on 27-3-t996, on his own expenses. 2. Leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner submits •that the question involved, herein asto whether the teacher, who obtained B.Ed. Exammation Cert-ificate on his own expenses, is entitted to two advonce increments. 3. According to leamed counal fai; Ihe petitioner. -the petitioner is entitled to two advcnce increments in view of the decision of this Courf in the case of yashwant Kumar Bhanichroj Vs. Municipal Corporation. Durg and another {2006 CEE) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant fomcB' Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, t>urg ond another (Supra), came to the conclusion that +he teodiers, -^-^^. who had obtained B. Ed. /B.TJ. Examination Certificate on -their own expenses, are covered by the circuhr dated 24.12.98 isaied by State Sovemment of Madhya Pradesh. Leomed counsel for •the petitioner further submits that •the facts and question of law involved in •the present coise are sqiwirely covered by decision of this Court in the cose of yashwant Kumar Bharadwey Vs. Municipal Corporotion. f3wg and another (Supra), to which leamed counsel appearing for the respondents fairty concedes and agrees with the averment made by leamed counsel oppedu'ing for the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumnr Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, burg and another (Supra), aibject to verificatwn of the fact as to whe-ther -the petitioner has ocquired B.Ed. Examination Cerl'ificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 and further whe'ther he has been paid two advonce increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agiiihotri Judge Subhash