THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.747 of 2011 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed alleging that the respondent has violated the directions issued by this Court in order, dated 25.01.2011, by interfering with the possession of the petitioners. In W.P.No.20821 of 2010, the petitioners as well as the fifth respondent have claimed possession over the subject land. While disposing of the Writ Petition, in view of their rival claims for possession, this Court has specifically recorded that it is not possible to record any finding as to who is in possession of the land in question. In the light of the said finding recorded by this Court, the allegation of the petitioners that they are in possession of the subject land and the respondent is interfering with the same cannot be accepted. If really, the petitioners are in possession of the land in question, it is open for them to workout their remedies in the civil Court but I do not find any contemptuous action on the part of the respondent to entertain this Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The Contempt Case is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 6th JULY, 2011. kvni