IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRtT PETITION No.(-S6S-OF 2006 PETITIONERS Lal Purohit, S/o. Late Shri Raman Lal Purohit aged About 66 years, R/o. HIG- 15, Tatibandh, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : .1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Dharmada Registrar, Public Trust, Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Raipur (C.G.) < v\'^ '^y 4 Girdhar Bhavan Dharamsala Trust, Raipur, A F^-iblic Trust, registered Under C.G. Public Trust Act, through Manoharlal Purohit, aged about 62 years, son of Late Shri Lalit Lal Purohit, R/o. Burhapara, Raipur (C.G.) Manoharlal Purohit, aged about 62 years, son of Late Shri Lalit Lal Purohit, R/o. Burhapara, Raipur (C.G.) Sharad Lal Purohit, aged about 46 years, son of Late Shri Lalit Lal Purohit R/o. Burhapara, Raipur (C.G.) c ...•••°rl.^ y^y^ ^^^ \'.^..-:R'y' .^'...^•" .^~ .,y '^'"^' ../• •''-^'^ -.•-"'" p^' ..-•'' ^'' c.&'"'' ~\ ^7. M/s. Harpreetam. Enterprise, Raipur (C.G.), a partnership firm, through its partner Harjeet Singh Bhatia, son of Gurdayal Singh, aged 50 years near Netaji Hotel, Raipur (C.G.) /8. Smt. Anita Singhwani, wife of Shri Ajay Singhwani, aged 50 years R/o. Jawahar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE ^" 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARY AND/OR ANY OTHER ,^ SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKE NATURE Hie" COURT oc JUD!CATUS?E cHKAmse/yw : BIU^PUR S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanjho&i, .1. Petitioner Respondents WritPetition No. 18SSof2QQS Madhusudan La! Purohtt Versus State of ChhEdtisgarh and others prosent: D.r. N.K. Shukia. -SsniQr Adyocsts with Shri -Shas'SRdra Shukia, Advocaie for the petitioner. Smt- Anju Ahuja, Dy- Govt. Advnc^-te for >e Respondente No. 1 to 3/State. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Advocate for the respondents No. 7 snd 8. ORDtK (Passed on 23 day of February, 2007) 1. Leamsd counssl appearing fcr ths pst'tiansr submite that ths pststioner seeks psrmiss'.OR of thfe Court to wittidra".' this petition with 'iberty to take recourse to tega! remedies that may be available under the provisions of taw. He ftirfrier submits that me stetus quo of the buitding in dlspute should be maintained for a period of four weeks tiil the petffioner moves the appropriate forum for interim rslief, to which i@amed couiisd appeanng for ths responuonfei has no ^^M^*«1'»,^»S Wt«/JC<L»UVtJ. 2. !t is ordsrsd aecordsng'y. 3. The writ "eUtion is acc-nrdinQly dismissed as '«'jthdrawnwith the aforestated observaUon. r———- 'Sd/- . Satish K. Agnihotri Judge