- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.64 OF 2006 Ketan K.Tirodkar ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Petitioner-in-person present Mr.S.R.Borulkar P.P. with Mrs.P.H.Kantharia A.P.P. for State ... CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : MARCH 20, 2006 DATE : MARCH 20, 2006 DATE : MARCH 20, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the petitioner-in-person and leaned P.P. for the State. 2. The prayers made in this petition are; "(A) ordering the Bureau of Anti-corruption to deposit the records and proceedings of the investigation against P.S.I.Nayak and his wife with this Court." This prayer cannot be granted as the investigation is going on. The Investigating Agency would require all the records with themselves and ultimately when the charge-sheet is filed, they will decide what to do with records and which papers should be annexed with the file. "Prayer - 2 - (B) for ordering the Director General of Anti-Corruption to file affidavit as to whether there is a prima facie case against P.S.I. Nayak and his wife." The F.I.R. has now been registered and therefore, this prayer also does not survive. "Prayer (C) is for ordering immediate suspension of P.S.I.Nayak." He has already been suspended and he was arrested, therefore, this prayer also does not survive. "Last prayer (D) is for giving security to the petitioner." That prayer is also granted and security is being provided to the petitioner. Hence, nothing further survives in this petition. Petition and application are dismissed. Two reports have been submitted by the learned P.P. about the progress of investigation. Since the petition is dismissed, there is no necessity for further submission of any reports. [D.G.DESHPANDE, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]