Picalntiff ApBeaS No. 409/2007 Ram Vriksh. Slo Ram Taha!. aaed about 60 years, Caste - Harijan, R/o vitlage Sudamanaaar, Chowki - Bhatgaon, Teh.si! • Surjpur, Dist. Ssrguja (C.G.) fc^i-,.S~.„ ^.»,...,4-» it^'<s;ie:(i'<y!ciii<..& 1. Sahadan. S/o Shiv Ratan. Caste - Panika. Aged about years, R/o Sudama Nagar, Chowki - Bhatgaon, Tehsil - Surjpur, Dist. Sarguja (C.G.) 2. State of Chhattlsgarh, Through Coflector, Sarguja (C.G.) iL SECTION 100 OF THE CML PROCEDUR.E ^tf&5^.?= »^Wt^& Shri A.N.Pandey, counse! for the appellant/plaintiff ORAL ORDER (Passed on OS.07.2008) Heard on l.A.No.1 fortaking document i.e. copy ofjudgment and decree passed bythe tria! Court, on record. 2. i.A.isaJtowedandthedocumentista.kenonrecord. 3. Heard on admission. 4. The appellant is aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 26.06.2006 passed in Ci'/il Appsa! ^Jo. 11-A'2004 by ths 1st AddsSiona! Distrfot Judge, Sura.jpur, Dist. Sarguja afflrming the judgment and decree 31.12.2003 by the Civil Judge Cfass-2. Surajpur in Civil Suit No. 29- 5. The appeil-ant's/pls.intiffs clalm was founded on adverse possesslon over government land. Bofh the Courts below have, on proper appreciatton of evidence, he!d th-at tho appeHant has miserabiy failed to prove adverse nossession. it has ateo been recorded that no notice under J_^—-»'t-^ -2 Sectlon 80 C.P.C-. was alven to the State Government before institution of fha Suit. i am of the considered ooinion that no substantia.i auestion of law arises for deterrn'nation ofthis aDoea'. 6. According'y, the appeal being devoid of merit is dismissed at the aamission stage. (.;onsequenfly, i.A.Nn.3 tor early tieanng OT me case sianas aisoosee Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge