1 S.B.Cr.Misc. II Bail App. No. 4544/2007 (Shyam Lal @ Sham Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 14/09/2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Hemant Jain for the petitioner. Mr. V.R.Mehta Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. This is second bail application. While rejecting the earlier bail application, the petitioner was granted liberty to move a fresh bail application after recording of the statement of medical jurist. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the statement of medical jurist has been recorded by the trial court as PW-8 Dr. Amarsingh Rathore who stated that all the injuries suffered by the injured are simple in nature by sharp. It is further contended by the counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody for more than four months and the trial is likely to take long time. Without commenting on the merit of the case, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Shyam Lal @ Sham Lal S/o Satu Ram be released on bail in FIR No. 183/07 P.S. Jawahar Nagar, Sri Ganganqagar, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of 2 Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP