IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.21 of 2010 BINOD KUMAR SINGH S/O SUB R.N.SINGH R/O HANUMAN NAGAR,NEAR SIGNAL QUARTER DANAPUR DIST.- PATNA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE SECRETARIAT PATNA. 3. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,GANDHI MAIDAN,PATNA. 4. SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER (S.D.P.O.) ANAND BAZAR DANAPUR CANTT,PATNA. 5. OFFICER-IN-CHARGE CUM S.H.O.DANAPUR POLICE STATION , DANAPUR,PATNA. 6. H.D.F.C. BANK LTD, B W.S. ROAD GILLANDER HOUSE BLOCK A KOLKATTA 700001. 7. PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH @ PRAMOD NARAIN SINGH S/O BABAN SINGH R/O DEV NANDAN ENCLAVE,FLAT NO.-103 ASHOKPURI,KAJPURA PATNA PERMANENT R/O AT AND P.O.- PHURAN P.S.- BARHARA,DIST.- BHOJPUR ----------- 3 07.12.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon taking a transport loan from the respondent-Bank the petitioner was paying the installments regularly, however, during existence of the laon the respondent no.7 being the guarantor, physically took away the vehicle and thereafter the petitioner stopped paying the installment. It is submitted that due to the illegal action of the respondent no.7 in taking away the vehicle illegally petitioner lodged a first information report which was registered as Danapur P.S. Case No. 43 of 2010. It is further submitted that the police is not properly investigation the case. Learned counsel for the State opposes the above submissions. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although petitioner has complained before the higher police officials about the inaction of the Investigating Officer, however, no action is being taken although has not filed any such petition bringing it to the notice of the concerned Court. Learned counsel, however, submits that petitioner proposes to take fresh appropriate steps as permissible under the law for early completion of investigation. In view of the above, the writ application stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)