(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 1421 OF 2011 Badrinath s/o. Digambar Dhabadkar, Age : 26 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Mandala, Taluka : Ghansawangi, .. Petitioner District : Jalna. (Original plaintiff) versus Waman s/o. Bhagwan Giri, Age : 50 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Bodkha Bk., Taluka : Ghansawangi, .. Respondents District : Jalna, (Original defendant and 4 others. nos.1 to 5) ....................... Mr. M.K. Deshpande, Advocate, for the petitioner. ........................ CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 25TH FEBRUARY 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. Heard Adv. Mr. M.K. Deshpande, for the petitioner. (2) 2. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 8-2-2011 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ghansawangi, below Exhibit 56 in Regular Civil Suit No. 187/2009, thereby rejecting the application filed by the petitioner seeking examination of his father as a witness. 3. The trial court has found that there were no reasons assigned for not examining father earlier or then, his absence was not substantiated. 4. I do not see any jurisdictional error or perversity as for valid reasons at the stage of final arguments, application of the petitioner / plaintiff to lead evidence of said father has been rejected. 5. With liberty to the petitioner, to challenge the impugned order, after suit is finally decided, if occasion therefor arises, present petition is disposed of. No costs. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp1421