CWP (T) No.7843 of 2008 30.04.2009 Present: Mr. Pritam Singh Chandel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General for the respondent. The petitioner had qualified the screening test for the post of Agriculture Extension Officer. His precise case is that despite his qualifying the examination, he was not called for the interview. However, the learned Senior Additional Advocate General on the basis of Annexure R-1 submits that the petitioner was informed under Postal Certificate (UPC). A bare perusal of Annexure R-1 reveals that the petitioner’s name figured at Sr.No.4. It is properly stamped. There is a presumption under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act that the petitioner had received the letter. He has not led any tangible evidence to prove that the call letter was not issued by the respondent. He could lead this evidence by seeking information from the postal department. He has failed to do so. Accordingly, there is no merit in the present petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. April 30, 2009. (rkv)