•.^:/ ^ .^0 ^ )il,-'1 ^ffH£HlGHC0VRt»€MlM®tS<^RH^T'Bl^SF>l.lR Wiy-FsPE'r'I'FI^N N©.^^8/04 PETITIONER ft^ M ^s^ Manofama Verma, Wife of Shri Lakhanlal Verma, Aged about 50 •.%^:^^:''L^'^'"~li^'"^~''^~~^ ^A.^^j^^ li|ears,^^^^^ Service, ft/6. Palari, Tahsit Palari, OjstrictRaipur (C.G.). MMm "'. •. ., . •• &ESP©Nt®lStli 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Throughi ISeGFetat-y 8c Ministry of Health fi£ ;; ;: EawtUy Welfare Deparfni^ht, jBttK.S. Btiawan Raipur (C.G.) s|.£ i|jj|l|(| Exeeutive Officer, DisfriCt ^KB{g|ln|3liayattKaipur (C.G.) 3. i0 i'ffiG.). ;•.'.. ,1 : :i 4. CMef Meaical fil Health G)ffiGei-,| DistrictRaipur (C.G.) 5. Block Medical Officer, DistriGtl Raipur ((S.G.) mK ^SSSWtaiSSUS^WSiiii6JM^HW ::^:^,i^^':';';:|:1?ia^mMnii»iig i^i^;' ;:11:.^ :li !.iiili: XI-HC-22 an^r^ii [<-ti+ aniRT st)*iicn ^Eid ...,,IIKf "••"•l'—u..,! -3^'3iFn?ra, •^ftwra, i»«'iwi< 3TI^?T '^3R ^.^, ^o. 2-S-^'/2-^^- ^ 200 111CTI ShW* l^^tT' an^T'?RiTW;Hf?g 26-8-2004 On a mention being made, this ca^e is taken up. Petrtioner/sbyShn /?&Ao/< |^tJcA»(, /Ui&cafe.. State by Shri V.V.S. Murthy, I]iy. Advocatff General, with Shri Satish Gupta, Dy.G.A, and SKri Akhil Agrawal and Shiji Sandeep Oubey, Panel Lawyeis. Heard. -' . - The matter relates to transfer oftH Counsel for the petitioner/s subm) sffected illegally in contravention of law 4nd policy. State counsel opposed it. State coimsei submitted that thel without sen'ing notice for demand ofjusti opinion on the merits of the case. in thel his/lier grievances and grounds before th' respondents along with a copy of the peti' under the law, shall eonsider and decide <*l''4i<-)''fl-1 lTFq?ff 4 fe^ 'd^re5i< ^; SlPtftI 3H^( petitioner from the respective place. .tted that the transfer ofthe petinoner.'s has been petitioner/s has straightway filed Lhe psriuon ;e and represemation. Having heard and considersd t|ze rival contentions, without expressLig any opmion of th-'s Court, ends of _iusti;e wili be sen'ed if s dirsction is given to the petit^oner/s to make detaiied represenianon rais'.ng ^ State Govemment'competent authority of the tion and this order, within 10 davs, and on such representation being filed, the State Gove(nment/competent authority of the respondents, the ssime on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible preferably withiFl six weeks irom the date 01 receipt/prouuctio.v:t of the representation. If any contravenljion of policy or guidelines is brought lo the notice, the same be considered'on its OVITI tr.erits. Counsel for the petilioner/s pray^ any gnevance of the petitioner.'s remain^ available under the law. It is open to the p) law. that after the decision of the representaxion if . he/'she mav be allowed to avail the remedv ltitioner to avail the remedy available under the With the aforesaid obsen'ations, tljus petition stands disposed of. Consequently M.W.P., ifany, als^ stands disposed '.'if, Certified copy as per rules- Copy to State counsel tor compliance. : ^- Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge