IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3141 of 2009 Between: Ganjikuntla Venkataiah S/o. Narsaiah R/o. Chennaram Village, Nelakondapally (M) Khammam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintending Engineer Panchayat Raj, Khammam. 2 The Executive Engineer P.R. Division, Khammam. 3 The Deputy Executive Engineer Panchayat Raj Sub Division, Tirumalayapalem, Khammam District. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not cooperating with the petitioner by selecting the suitable land and marking the lines with white lime powder for the purpose of constructing the community Hall at Peddamandava Village of Mudigonda Mandal, Khammam District as per Orders in Rc No. T6/MPLAD/208-09 dt. 14-11-2008 of the 2nd respondent as illegal, improper and void and consequently direct the respondents to select the suitable land and mark the lines with wite lime powder for the purpose of constructing the Community Hall and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.LNARASIMHA RAO & ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No. 3141 of 2009 Order: The grievance of the petitioner is that though the work for construction of Community Hall at Peddamandava village of Mudigonda Mandal, Khammam District, was sanctioned, the officials of the Panchayat Raj Department are not co-operating in marking out the site and providing other particulars. The writ petition was adjourned to enable the learned Government Pleader to obtain instructions. Today, it is reported that the marking has since been given on 24.02.2009. With this, the grievance of the petitioner redressed. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Date: 27.02.2009 Nsr