1 .-^•w^ " ^ {^^ THE HON9BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT €^?<<' L.^9' C^ 2^? NGI-E BZLASPUR PETITIONER W.P.C. N0. 6^S3 OF 2011 ^ 1. Bharat Lal son of Shri Mohan Lal, aged about-49 years R/o village- Sariya, Tahsil- Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 2. Shakuntala wife of Bharat Lal, aged about-45 years R/o village- Sariya, Tahsil- Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS l^ 2. 3. 4. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Nagriya Prashan Awam. Vikas Bibhag, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer, Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh(C.G.) Nayab Tahsildar, Sariya Tahsil- Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Sariya, Distt. Raigarh CG WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE ,226^_OF__,_THE CQNSTITUTION'OF ^ The__nelitioii-er-ne.^ri^c±£^u^-1^ :;;:i :N .y N : :??w i?? HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION YC) N0.6953 OF 2011 PETITIONERS Bharat Lal & Another RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri M.K. Sinha, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. General with Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents and respondenV Nagar Panchayat - Saria. ORDER (Passed on this 15th day of December, 2011) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that the respondent authorities have decided to withdraw the impugned notice dated 18-11-2011 (Annexure ~ P/1), as no sufficient time was given, and if necessary fresh notice shall be issued affording proper opportunity of hearing to the respective person to put forward their case, if any. In view of the above, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^