IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 9574 of 2005 Between: Pirla Sri Seshavani D/o. Ganga Rao Red Cross Street, Gandhinagar, Kakinada, East Godavari District. ... PETITIONER AND The Convenor/Vice Chancellor, EAMCET-2005, Jawaharlal Nehru Technical ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not issuing the Hall Ticket to the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, erroneous and highhanded and consequently direct the respondent to allow the petitioner to appear in the Eamcet-2005 examination which is going to be held on 29-4-2005. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.K.KISHORE REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: Mr.K.Rathangapani Reddy The Court at the stage of admission made the following: ORDER: Though the petitioner has furnished the number of the application, no details have been furnished by the petitioner as to the date, on which the application was submitted, nor any acknowledgement is produced to show that it was actually received by the respondent. In the circumstances, the Writ of Mandamus as prayed for cannot be granted. However, in case the petitioner approaches the respondent and furnishes the number of the application form and other necessary details, the respondent is directed to verify whether such application has been received within the time prescribed and if it is found to be in order the hall-ticket shall be issued to the petitioner. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ____________ G. ROHINI, J Dated: 27-04-2005 LSK To 1. The Convenor/Vice Chancellor, EAMCET-2005, Jawaharlal Nehru Technical 2. Two C.D. copies.