IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 10068 of 2000 Between: S.C.Nanji Reddy, S/o. Adinarayana Reddy, R/o. Syanaganapalli Village, Ananthapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Penukonda, Ananthapur District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Chilamathur Mandal, Ananthapur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ of direction declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not restoring the lands as directed by the 1st Respondent in his proceedings in C.C.No. 774/99/HDP dated 3.6.1999 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to restore the lands in favour of the petitioner forthwith as envisaged under section 7 (5) of Act 10/1977 and pass such other or further orders as the Hon'ble Court feels deem fit and proper in the facts circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.O.MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WP.NO.10068 OF 2000 ORDER: Sri Manohar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not necessitate adjudication. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _______________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN Date:12.6.2009 gk HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WP.NO.10068 OF 2000 DATE:12.6.2009.