IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 11042 of 2009 Between: 1 K.Hymavathi, W/o. Narasimha Reddy, R/o. NGO Colony, Rayachoty, Kadapa District. 2 M.Praveen Kumar Reddy, S/o. Dharma Reddy, R/o. NGO Colony, Rayachoty, Kadapa District. 3 M.Dharma Reddy, S/o. Ramana Reddy, R/o. Polimerapalli, H/o. Vangimalla Village, Veeraballi Mandal, Kadapa District. 4 M.Rajeswaramma, W/o. Dharma Reddy, R/o. Polimerapalli, H/o. Vangimalla Village, Veeraballi Mandal, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Food Inspector, Prakasam District, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad 2 Boorusu VEnkata Subbamma, W/o. Venkata Subbaiah, R/o. H.No. 7-471, Bhagyanara Colony, Kadapa City and Distict. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto call for the reoceds in Crime No.228/2009 on the file of the Chinna Chowk Police station, Kadapa , Kadapa District. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.V.R.REDDY KOVVURI, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER PSR, J. Crl.P.No. 11042 of 2009 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. The main complaint is against A-1 to A-4 alleging that they have done chit business and duped several persons of lakhs of rupees. The present petitioners are their relatives. The allegation against them is that they have promised to see that the money of the victims is paid to them and ultimately did not help in doing so. The names of the petitioners are not found in the original complaint. 3. Considering the nature of the allegations in the complaint, it is directed that the petitioners shall not be arrested till filing of the charge sheet if any. However, the investigation into the case and consequential proceedings based on the result of the investigation shall go on. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. February 9, 2010. *BVS