%. \ff f s-7 iENCH CLAiMANT Shobha Bais, D/o Shri Shatruhan Lal Bais, aged about 21 years, Residenf or l^iaimai Ward, Mungeii, Tahsil Mungelt, District iiIaspur(C.G.) ihawani Shankar Tiwari, Son of Neelkanth Tiwari, sged about 24 years, Resident of Pandariya Road, In front of Water Tank, Mungeii, District Biiaspur (C.G.) 2. Smt. Uma Tiwari, Wife of Neefkanth Tiwari, aged about 44 vears, Resident of Pandarivc Road, tn front of Water Tank, Mungeli, Di'strict Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. The Nen' India Insurance Company Llmited, Near Bus Starsd, Bilaspur, District BHaspur (C.G.) OFAPPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF THE MOTOI VEHJCLES ACT. 198S Present: Shri P.P. Sahu, learned counsel forthe appeiiant. >th The foilowina order or' the Court was passed by Shri P.P. Sahu, learned counsel for the appellant is heard cn \-t lant — Shobha Bais is seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Additionai Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mungeii, District - Bilaspur (for short 'the Tribunal') vide award dated 29.02.2008, passed in Claim Case No. 63/2007. 3) As against the compensation of Rs.4,10,000/- claimed by the appeiianfclaimant by filing a ciaim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, for the injuries sustained by her in the motor accident on 04.05.2007, the Tribunal awarded a total sum of Rs.22,000/- as compensation along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petiiion till the date of actual 4) Shri P.P. Sahu; iearned counsel for the appellant vehementl argued that the compensation of Rs.22,000/- awarded by 'ribunai is too low in comparison to the serious nature of the injuries sustalned by the appellanVclaimant in the motor accident. 5) For the reasons best known to the appeilant/claimani, no doctor was examined before the Tribunal to establish the nature of the injuries said to have been sustained by the appellant/claimant in the motor accident and the fact that those injuries resulted in any permanent disability. 6) In this state of evidence, we do not find any scope for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal. 7) The appeal, therefore,' is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. _____——— subbu Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- T.P. Sharina judge