1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7435/2005 (Bhonri Lal Sharma & Others Versus State of Rajasthan & Others) Date of Order :: 22nd April, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. Rajendra Soni the petitioners Mr. R.B. Mathur for the respondents Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present writ petition was preferred with a prayer to issue appropriate writ, order or direction to send the petitioners to other department after declaring them surplus only as according to the petitioners, they have been transferred without declaring them as surplus. 3. A notice to show cause was given to the respondents and in response thereto, they have filed the reply to the writ petition, wherein they have mentioned that the petitioners have been sent to other department after declaring them as surplus and in view of it nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition and it has become infructuous. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the reply given by the respondents, the writ petition be dismissed as having become infructuous. 2 5. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK 3 S.B. Civil Misc. Stay Application No. 6355/2005 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7435/2005 (Bhonri Lal Sharma & Others Versus State of Rajasthan & Others) Date of Order :: 22nd April, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. Rajendra Soni the petitioners Mr. R.B. Mathur for the respondents Consequent upon the dismissal of writ petition, the stay application, filed therewith does not survive and the same also stands dismissed. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK