1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.6058 OF 2007 (Shri Mukesh s/o Pundlikrao Game vs. State and others) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : APRIL 10, 2008 Heard Shri Sonwane, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri Kankale, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent no.1, and Shri Patil, learned Counsel for the respondent nos. 2 to 4. Shri Sonwane, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that in the present petition, the grievance of the petitioner is against the procedure adopted by the respondents while conducting screening test as well as question paper. It is contended that question paper, which was framed by the respondents, was not consistent with the topics, which were included in the syllabus, has resulted in causing great prejudice to the petitioner. 2 Shri Patil, learned Counsel for the respondent nos. 2 to 4, states that for the post of Clerk-cum-Typist, eligibility was S.S.C. with Marathi and English Typing knowledge. The graduates from Arts, Commerce and Science faculties applied for the said post and appeared for the test conducted by the respondent nos. 2 to 4 and, therefore, question paper was set in such manner to give as many options as possible to all the candidates. It is submitted that question paper was as per requirement of the advertisement and, therefore, contention canvassed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner in this regard is not proper. We have considered the contentions of the learned Counsel for the parties. The stand taken by the respondent nos. 2 to 4, which is reflected in the affidavit filed by them, has merit. The petition suffers from lack of merit and hence, the same is dismissed. . JUDGE JUDGE khj