( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13388 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 92 OF 2008 Radhesham s/o Madanlal Ladda and others. APPLICANTS VERSUS Gopal s/o Shivnath Ladda and others. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. R.R. Mantri, advocate for the applicants. Mr. Dalal, advocate holding for Mr. V.D. Salunke, advocate for respondents No. 10 and 11. ..... [CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [DATE : 20th April, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. Several attempts to effect service upon respondent No. 1 failed with the omissions from the concerned. The request for issuing notice by registered post A.D. and also service of notice under Order-VI Rule 14A sub Rule 4 (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, in the fact situation, cannot be said to be illusory. In ( 2 ) addition thereto, the notice will be affixed at the conspicuous place of ordinary residence of the respondent No.1. The application is allowed to the above extent. S.O. to 16th July, 2010. [ K. U. CHANDIWAL ] JUDGE NPJ/ca13388-09