:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2064 OF 2008 Shri Anil Hamir Wasia ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ..Respondents Mr. Suraj Kudalkar and M.S. Kumthekar for petitioner. Mr. S.N. Patil, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3. Mr. J.M. D’Silva for respondent no.4. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. Date : March 31, 2008. Date : March 31, 2008. Date : March 31, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the order passed by the Deputy Registrar, which has been duly confirmed by the Divisional Joint Registrar. Both the authorities concurrently held that the alleged election for the term 2003-2008 were not held by following the procedure as laid down in the bye-laws and consequently, the Managing Committee was not constitute in keeping with the provisions of Section 73 (3) of the Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960. In addition, the bonds which :2: were required to be furnished by the elected members of the Managing Committee under Section 73(1ab) read with Rule 58 (a) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules 1961 were also not in compliance with the prescribed requirements (Form M-20). 2. I have gone through the notice dated 16/8/2003 as well as 23/8/2003 and I am satisfied that the concurrent view taken by both the authorities below cannot be termed as perverse or patently erroneous so as to call for interference under Article 227 of the Constitution. 3. Hence, the petition is rejected summarily. The Competent Authority to ensure that the fresh elections are held as expeditiously as possible and in any case within two months from today. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)