Civil Revision No. 3652 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3652 of 2011 Date of Decision: 31.5.2011 *** Rohit Kohli .. Petitioner Vs. Aanchal .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. Kapil Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The parties are husband-wife respectively. The petitioner, through her mother, being his GPA filed a petition under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act seeking divorce from the respondent-wife. However, the GPA of the petitioner filed an application showing her inability to contest the petition and seeking permission to engage a counsel to contest the petition. The application was resisted by the respondent and after contest, the same has been dismissed by the Court below, leading to the filing of the instant petition. Heard. It is evident from the records that the reconciliation proceedings were deferred between the parties due to non-availability of the petitioner in India. Now, with the passing of the impugned order,he has simply been asked to appear in the Court for reconciliation, which is the requirement of law, that too with the liberty to personally file the application for the permission to be represented in the court through his legal representative. There is no merit in this petition. Dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE May 31, 2011 Jiten