IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA L.P.A. No.432 of 2011 IN C.W.J.C. No. 15541 of 2010 With I.A No. 1954 of 2011 And I.A. No. 1955 of 2011 In L.P. A. No. 432 of 2011 =====================--=============================== Ashok Kumar Yadav, aged about 45 years, S/o Late Sambhu Prasad Yadav, R/o Flat No. 204; Basudeo Jhari Apartment, Ved Nagar, Rukunpura, Mohalla- Rukunpura, P.O.-Vednagar, District-Patna, Pin-800014 …….. Appellant Versus 1. Awadesh Kumar Singh. S/o Raja Prasad Singh, presently posted as Drug Licensing Authority Sitamadhi, R/o Mohalla-Awas Nagar, P.O.- MIT, P.S.-Brahmpura, District – Muzaffarpur, Presently residing at Flat No. 305, Santosh Complex Bandar Bagicha, P.S.-Kotwali, District- Patna. …… Petitioner-Respondent 1st Set. 2. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar. 3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar. 4. The Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar. 5. The Additional Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar. 6. The Director, Department of Health, Government of Bihar. 7. The State Drug Controller, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna. …..Respondents-Respondents 2nd Set. =======================--============================= APPEARANCE : For the Appellant: Mr. Dr. Anshuman, Advocate. ======================--============================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2. 10.03.2011 The appellant, not party to the writ petition, has filed I.A. No. 1955 of 2011 for leave to file appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 3rd February 2011 made by the learned single Judge in above 2 C.W.J.C. No. 15541 of 2010. Learned Advocate Dr. Anshuman has appeared for the appellant. He has submitted that the appellant is due for transfer. In case the order of the learned single Judge is carried out, the appellant may be adversely affected. We see no substance in the grievance made by the appellant. No order has been made affecting the appellant. The Appeal is thoroughly misconceived. Application for leave to appeal is rejected. The Appeal and the Interlocutory Application No. 1954 of 2011 stand disposed of. Sujit (R.M.Doshit, CJ.) (Jyoti Saran,J.)