IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P(T) No. 7490 of 2008 Date of decision: June 15, 2011 Salig Ram Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge For the Petitioner: Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General ___________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner approached this Court aggrieved by Annexure A-2, show cause notice, and Annexure A-4, order of termination. As per Annexure A-1, the petitioner had already been regularized in service. But, according to Annexure A-4, the petitioner had not satisfied the required man days entitling him for regularization. Pursuant to Annexure A-2, show cause notice, the petitioner has submitted Annexure A-3, wherein also he has sought an opportunity for verification of the records. Along with the rejoinder, the petitioner has filed Miscellaneous Petition, dated 7.11.2006 which shows that in 1994 the petitioner had 269 day of work. That certificate is issued by the Range Officer. Apparently, there is some confusion in the verification of the records. It is seen that the 2 Tribunal had granted interim order on 22nd June, 2001 to maintain status quo. 2. There will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to look into the matter afresh with notice to the petitioner granting him an opportunity to verify the records and also in the light of the additional materials produced by the petitioner. This shall be done within a period of four months. In order to enable the third respondent to decide the matter, as above, Annexure A-4 is quashed. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. ( Justice Kurian Joseph ), Chief Justice June 15, 2011 (K) ( Justice V.K. Sharma ), Judge