IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc M- 11558 of 2010 Date of decision: 14.7.2010 Daljit Singh @ Vicky and anr …Petitioners Versus State of Punjab …Respondent Present: Mr Ajay Singla, proxy counsel for the petitioners. Mr VPS Sidhu, AAG Punjab. S.S.SARON, J. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail. The petitioners had been appearing before the trial Court on all dates fixed for hearing. However, they could not appear on 5.4.2010 and an application (P2) was filed seeking exemption from appearance. Thereafter, a request was made on behalf of the petitioners for their appearance in the post-lunch session. The said request was declined by the learned trial Court. The petitioners are facing trial for the offences under Sections 323/324 IPC. On the statement of the petitioners, a cross-case has been registered for the offences under Sections 323/324 and 326 IPC which has been added later. Learned counsel for the petitioners and the State submit that the petitioners have appeared before the trial Court in consequence of the interim bail granted on 26.4.2010 and furnished their bail bonds and surety bonds. Cr Misc M- 11558 of 2010 2 In view of the above, the interim bail granted on 26.4.2010 is made absolute. This petition stands disposed of. 14.7.2010 ( S.S.SARON ) ASR Judge