IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY WRIT PETITION No.20183 of 2001 Between: Aruna Fishermen Co-operative Society, reptd., by its President-Seru Sandayya Gollapalem, Kajuluru Mandal, East Godavari District. … Petitioner And District Collector, East Godavari District, Kakinada and four others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri M.Pavan Kumar Aditya for Sri Sri L.Ravichander. Counsel for the respondents: ---- This Court made the following: ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly in the nature of writ or Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent 1 to 3 in not renewing the lease hold rights of the petitioner for Palakamma Cheruvu by following the various G.Os., is arbitrary, illegal, unjust, contrary to law and violative of various orders issued by the Government from time to time, apart from violating the principles of natural justice, contrary to the provisions of Panchayat Raj Act and in violation of Art. 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequential directions to the Respondents to renew the lease for a further period of 3 yrs, at the rate fixed by the 2nd Respondent”. At the hearing, Sri M.Pavan Kumar Aditya, counsel representing Sri L.Ravichander, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration and that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as infructuous. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. ------------------------------- ----- C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:15-9-2008 MNR