(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. Writ Petition No. 4018 of 2009 Savitribai Bhagwandas Agrawal. .. Petitioner (Original defendant) versus Vimalbai Prabhakar Suryavanshi .. Respondent (Original plaintiff) .................. Mr. J.V. Dhumal, Advocate, holding for Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate, for the petitioner. .................. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 1ST JULY 2009. COURT’S ORDER : 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 21st March 2009, passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gangakhed, below Exhibit 47 in Regular Civil Suit No. 280/2006, thereby allowing the application filed by the respondent plaintiff seeking permission to deposit costs of Rs. 200/- as per order dated 10-4-2007 below Exhibit 1 in Regular Civil Suit No. 418/1999. (2) 2. Mr. J.V. Dhumal, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the trial court has grossly erred in allowing the plaintiff to deposit costs though there was an inordinate delay. 3. From the perusal of the impugned order, it would reveal that the trial court has reserved the right of the present petitioner to raise objection regarding non-depositing of costs within time, at the time of final arguments. 4. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 5. Petition is, therefore, dismissed. ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE ...................... bgp/wp4018