IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 10.11.2010 COCP No.2035 of 2010 (O&M) Rai Sahib ...Petitioner Versus Nirmal Singh Mann and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr.S.P.S.Tinna, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the contempt jurisdiction of this Court alleging non-compliance of the order passed by the Divisional Canal Officer on 08.07.2010. The record of the petition shows that on 10.09.2010, the District Magistrate has sought police help. The report in respect of opening of naka by the respondents on 26.09.2010 has also been produced on record. Thus, when the petitioner has been provided police help earlier, therefore, it cannot be said that the authorities are not taking steps to implement the order passed by the Divisional Canal Officer. It is open to the petitioner to seek police help again, if the order passed by the Divisional Canal Officer is not being given effect to by any of the parties to the dispute. I do not find that any case for initiation of contempt proceedings is made out. Dismissed. 10.11.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE