1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.02.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.(MD).No.2225 of 2011 Rm.Shanmugam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Karaikudi Sub-Division, karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 3.Ravichandran ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents more particularly the second respondent from interfering with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent. For petitioner : Mr.T.Kumar For respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel, 1 & 2 Addl. Government Pleader ORDER The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents more particularly the second respondent from interfering with the civil dispute pending between himself and the third respondent. 2.According to the petitioner, there is a land dispute between himself and the third respondent. With respect to the very same cause of action, the third respondent has filed a petition before the Superintendent of Police on 18.07.2005. The Superintendent of Police directed the petitioner to appear before the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Devakottai. The said complaint was disposed of by the Deputy Superintendent of Police directing the parties to approach the Civil Court. Subsequently, the third respondent filed a fresh complaint before the Inspector of Police, North Police Station, Karaikudi. The complaint was enquired into and ultimately a case in Crime No.64 of 2005 was registered against him on the file of the Aravayal Police Station. In the meantime, the second respondent called the petitioner to the Police Station. This made the petitioner to file the writ petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3.The learned Additional Government Pleader on instructions from the second respondent submitted that there were three petitions pending before the second respondent against the petitioner. He was summoned to the Police Station only to enquire with respect to those petitions. According to the learned Government Pleader, the petitioner has to appear before the second respondent and the matter would be decided on merits. 4.The petitioner is also agreeable to appear before the second respondent on any of the working days. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to appear before the second respondent at his office at 10.30 a.m. on 09.03.2011. It is open to the petitioner to appear along with his counsel before the second respondent. The second respondent is directed to enquire into the complaints and dispose of the same on merits and as per law, without harassing the petitioner. 6.The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Crl.Side) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Karaikudi Sub-Division, karaikudi, Sivagangai District. +One CC to Mr.T.Kumar, Advocate, Sr.No.10659 +One cc to The Spl. Govt. Pleader, SR.No.10802 gcg rl/5c – 2.3.2011 W.P.(MD).No.2225 of 2011 28.02.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/