CWP No. 11447 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CWP No. 11447 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.07.2011 Vijay Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Sanjiv Puri, Advocate for the petitioner. ... Alok Singh, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that respondent No.4 – Mangal Dass had filed one civil suit against the petitioner (defendant therein), stating that suit land is village pond, therefore, petitioner (defendant) be restrained from encroaching the village pond property; in the pending civil suit, the only question involved is whether suit property is village pond property or is the property of the petitioner (defendant). Learned counsel has further stated that now Mangal Dass has got issued notices in question from the Municipal Council, Banga to dispossess the petitioner from the suit land. CWP No. 11447 of 2011 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner shall file civil suit against the Municipal Council, Banga, impleading Mangal Dass – respondent No.4 as one of the defendants, claiming his title and possession over the property in dispute. He has vehemently stated that if petitioner files suit, the same should be heard and decided alongwith the suit filed by Mangal Dass against the petitioner involving the same question as to whether suit property is village pond property or the property is owned and possessed by the petitioner herein. Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 20.07.2011 sk.