1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Eleventh day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14602 of 2011 1 KOLIKADAI MUTHAIYA 2 MARIYAMMAL ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.3 & 4 Vs STATE : REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SEDAPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.202/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.202 of 2011, for offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 324 and 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners are before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail. 2. It is alleged that in a wordy quarrel, the first accused attacked the de facto complainant causing a simple injury on his hand. Insofar as the petitioners herein are concerned, there is no specific overt act attributed. It is stated by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the injured is undergoing treatment in a private hospital. However, the learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that though the de facto complainant sustained a single injury, which is simple in nature, and wantonly, he has gone to a private hospital for treatment. The learned counsel relied on the averments contained in the First Information Report, which shows that a simple hurt was caused on the hand of the de facto complainant. 3. Having regard to the above, I am inclined to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioners, but with conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.II, Usilampatti, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall report https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 before the respondent police at 10.30 AM for a period of four weeks, without fail and the second petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for the purpose of interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 11/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, USILAMPATTI. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SEDAPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. + 1. CC to M/S. P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate SR. No.39161 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14602 of 2011 Date :11/11/2011 RJ/12.11.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/