Interim Relief application No. 8083/08 WPCRL No. 958 of 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent no.1 and 2. By means of this writ petition, a mandamus has been sought for a direction to the respondent No.1 and 2 to safeguard the life and liberty of the petitioners and further for a direction to the respondent No.3 not to interfere in the married life of the petitioners. The petitioners have a remedy before the State Government on the administrative side, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the petition. However, it is open for the petitioners to approach the State Government if any action is due on the part of the police agency. On failure on the part of the State Government in taking any step regarding protection to the life and liberty of the petitioners, the petitioners may approach this Court. The petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (P.C. Verma, J.) 2.12.2008 2.12.2008 Mohit/Rathour