MC 3739/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. K. SHARMA Heard Dr. B. Ahmed, learned counsel for the writ petitioner/applicant. A lso heard Mr. M.K. Mishra, learned Standing Counsel, Education as well as Mr. A. R. Talukdar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 5. By means of this application, the writ petitioner/applicant has prayed f or suspending the order dated 8.9.2010, by which the District Elementary Educati on Officer, Karimganj, has allowed the Block Elementary Education Officer, R.K. Nagar, to draw and disburse the salary of teaching and non-teaching staff of the School in question. Such an arrangement has been made temporarily until finalis ation of the proceedings in the writ petition. The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner making a grievance ag ainst Annexure-9 order dated 24.6.2010, by which the Director, Elementary Educat ion, Assam has promoted the respondent No. 5 to the post of Head Master, in the present School. When the writ petition was entertained, it was provided that such appointment of the respondent No.5 will be subject to the further order to be passed in the wr it petition. Thus, in terms of the said order, the promotion of the respondent N o.5 has not been interfered with. If the authority has decided to allow the Bloc k Elementary Education Officer to draw and disburse the salary of the petitioner during the pendency of the writ petition, no infirmity can be attributed to the said decision. Consequently, the MC stands dismissed.