IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 5TH APRIL 2010 / 15TH CHAITHRA 1932 RP.No. 214 of 2010(G) --------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS --------------------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23. 2. THE ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KSRTC, NORTH PARAVUR. 3. THE ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KSRTC, MALA. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR,SC, KSRTC RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS -------------------------- 1. M.S.BALAN, S/O.SIVAN CHETTIAR, DEPOT ENGINEER(RETD.), KSRTC, RESIDING AT CHANDRAVILASATHU PARAMBU, KIZHAKKEPURAM, NORTH PARAVOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. K.K.CHINNAPPAN, S/O.S.KRISHNAN, ASST. DEPOT ENGINEER(RETD.), KSRTC, RESIDING AT KALLUPARAMBIL VEEDU, SOUTH ADUVASSERY, VIA. CHENGAMANAD, ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN FOR R1-R2 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- R.P.No.214 OF 2010 IN W.P(C).22953 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of April, 2010 O R D E R The judgment sought to be reviewed essentially followed on consent. The submission made on behalf of the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation was recorded. That fact is not disputed in the review petition. Therefore, the effect of Annexure A, which is nothing but a copy of Ext.R1(a), was not looked into. Annexure A [Ext.R1(a)] only deferred the payment of outstandings to better times. May be that the KSRTC was of the view that better times would come within six months as recorded in the judgment. Under such circumstances, I do not find any ground to review the judgment. The review petition fails. The same is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.06/04.