IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 2ND JANUARY 2009 / 12TH POUSHA 1930 WA.No. 1 of 2009() ------------------ {IN WPC.14710/2004 OF THIS COURT} .................... APPELLANT(S): ------------------------ T.P. DAVID, (CONSUMER NO. 11643), THOPPIL AGGREGATES, KOKKAPPILLY P.O., VIA , THIRUVANKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICITY SECTION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PUTHENCRUZ. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, TRIPUNITHURA. 3. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB FOR R1-3 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.B. KOSHY, Ag.C.J. & V.GIRI, J. ------------------------- W.A.No.1 of 2009 ------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of January, 2009. JUDGMENT Koshy, Ag.C.J. The appellant's appeal was partly allowed by Ext.P6. Consequently, Ext.P7 demand was issued. The main contention of the appellant is that while issuing Ext.P7 directions given by the appellate authority were not complied with and amount of refund due to him were not adjusted. Further, as per the appellate authority's decision, the maximum amount due from the appellant is Rs.30,000/- and that was remitted. If that be so, the petitioner may file a representation to the 1st respondent, who passed Ext.P7. If the petitioner files a representation before the 1st respondent within one month, after remitting Rs.10,000/-, the representation should be considered and disposed of. No further demand shall be made till the disposal of the said representation. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (J.B. KOSHY) Ag. Chief Justice Sd/- (V.GIRI) JUDGE sk/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge