1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No.7063 OF 2009 Bansilal s/o Chhabilal Dhangar... Petitioner. Versus Rajiv s/o Gangaram Thoke And Others. ... Respondents. -------- Shri. Rajendrraa Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner. Shri. G.R. Ingole, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Shri. V.B. Ghatge, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.2 to 4. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE: 16th JUNE, 2010 ORAL ORDER: 1) Heard. 2) The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner Shri. Rajendrraa Deshmukh submits that in the light of the communication dated 2 5-12-2009 made by the State under the Right to Information Act, to the petitioner, it transpired that the respondents had done away with the practice of granting 5% grace marks under Circular dated 25-10-2005. 3) If this is the case then petitioner has alternate remedy of seeking review of the impugned judgment and order before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. 4) In case the petitioner decides to file review petition within two weeks from today then the petitioner is entitled to raise plea about pendency of the present petition before this Court from 3rd October 2009. We have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 5) The writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (K.K. TATED, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.694.09