IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 893 of 2008 With Interim Relief Application No. 7515/2008 Kuldeep Singh, S/o Late Sri Kartar Singh. ....... Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. ........ Respondents Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. K.K. Shah, Advocate for respondent no. 4. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. K.K. Shah, Advocate for respondent no. 4. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. On due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; the contents of the F.I.R; the fact that the present petitioner has identified Singhara Singh before the Bank; the fact that the present petitioner identified a wrong person before the Bank authorities who was not actually Singhara Singh; and in the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any good ground to grant relief to the petitioner, as claimed in the petition. 4. I am refraining from commenting on the merits of the case lest it may prejudice the petitioner’s case at the trial which is yet to start. 5. In view of above, the petition and the relief sought in this petition are liable to be dismissed and are hereby dismissed in limine. Consequently, the interim relief application is also dismissed. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 02.12.2008 V.K