FIRST APPEAL No.183 OF 1993 Against the Jugdment and Award dated 19th November, 1992 passed by Sri Devendra Prasad Singh, Special Land Acquisition Judge, III, Patna in L.A.Case No.32Of 1987. SRI HARSH KUMAR KOCHAR------Applicant-Appellant. @ HARSH KUMAR KOCHAR. Versus STATE OF BIHAR-------------O.Party-Respondent. For the appellant: Mr. Markandey Singh, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Dated 12th August,2010 P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO JUDGMENT Mungeshwar Sahoo,J. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The applicant land lord appellant has filed this First Appeal against the Judgment and Award dated 19.11.1992 passed by Sri Devendra Prasad Singh, learned Special Land Acquisition Judge, III,Patna in L.A.Case No.32 of 1987. 3. It appears that 42.96 acres lands were acquired by the State of Bihar for Establishment of Transport Nagar. In connection with that acquisition there were more than 100 reference cases under section 80 of the Land Acquisition Act. By the common impugned Judgment and Award of the reference cases were decided by the learned Land Acquisition Judge. Being aggrieved against the said impugned judgment and award many first appeals have been filed before this Court. It appears that by terms of Judgment dated 26.3.2010 passed in 2 batch of First Appeal , i.e., F.A. No.134/94 and other first appeals relying upon various decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court it was held inter alia that the learned reference Judge has taken into consideration the detail of the facts and circumstances of the case and believing the doctrine of average has fixed the amount of Rs.21,000/-.Hence, there is no error in the said determination. On this finding the appeals and cross objections were dismissed. In other words the impugned Judgment and award has been confirmed. 4. This first appeal is directed against the said impugned judgment and award which has already been confirmed. 5. In my opinion, therefore, the judgment and award passed by this Court on 26.3.2010 in F.A.No.134/94 shall govern this First Appeal also. 6. It further appears that relying on the said decision of this Court dated 26.3.2010 another first appeal which was also analogus being F.A. No.197/93 has been dismissed on 16.4.2010. 7.In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Fist Appeal No.183/93 is dismissed. In the facts and circumstances of the case there will no order as to costs. Patna High Court, The 12th of August,2010. AnilKr.Sinha,Secretary/N.A.F.R. ( Mungeshwar Sahoo )