IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2517 of 2007 MANOJ KUMAR YADAV son of Rambadan Yadav, resident of Village Matha, P.O. Salkhua Bazar, P.S. Salkhua, Distt. Saharsa. ---Petitioner Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, Commissioner-Cum- Secretary, Human Resources Development Deptt., Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. Sri Ashutosh, Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. Narmedeshwar Lal (now Sri R. Laxman), District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Saharsa. 5. Sri Balkrishna Das, District Superintendent of Education, Saharsa. 6. Sri Ramchandra Pd. Singh, Block Education Extension Officer, Block Salkhua, District Saharsa. 7. Arun Kumar Singh, Block Development Officer, Salkhua, Saharsa. 8. Jagdish Malakar, Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Koparia, District Saharsa. 9. Shashi Shekhar Verma, Gram Panchayat Sachiv, Gram Panchayat Raj Koparia, Distt. Saharsa. 10. Ranjana Kumari, wife of Rohin Kumar of Vill. Koparia, P.O. Salkhua Bazar, P.S. Salkhua Distt. Saharsa. 11. Prabhat Kumar Prabhakar, son of Ashok Kumar Nirala of Village Matham, P.O. Salkhua Bazar, P.S. Salkhua, Distt. Saharsa. 12. Manoj Kumar son of Kapildeo Prasad Yadav of Village Koparia, P.O. Salkhua Bazar, P.S. Salkhua, Disttt. Saharsa. 13. Ajay Kumar son of Mahendra Pd. Yadav of Village Bankatti, P.O. Salkhua Bazar, P.S. Salkhua, Saharsa. 14. Sanjeev Kumar Bharati, son of Sita Ram Yadav of Village Koparia, P.O. Salkhua Bazar, P.S. Salkhua, Distt. Saharsa. 15. Manoj Kumar son of Upendra Yadav of Village Koparia, P.O. Salkhua Bazar, P.S. Salkhua, Distt. Saharsa. 16. Guriya Kumari, wife of Mahendra Pd. Yadav of Village Matha, P.O. Salkhua Bazar, P.S. Salkhua, District Saharsa. 17. Anil Kumar Azad, son of Bishundeo Pandit of Village Matha, P.O. Salkhua, Bazar, P.S. Salkhjua, District- Saharsa. --Opposite Parties ----------- 3. 16.9.2009 A show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite party no.4 in this case in which it is stated that the order of this Court 2 has been complied with upon passing the order dated 22.7.2008 as per Memo No.447-2 dated 25.7.2008, contained in Annexure A to the show cause. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the order is not correct, the petitioner proposes to assail the said order in an appropriate proceeding. In view of the above, the contempt application need not proceed. The same stands disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)