IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2009 / 29TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 19586 of 2009(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. V.SANTHAKUMARI AMMA, MANAGER, PATTAM THANU PILLAI MEMORIAL TEACHERS TRAINING INSTITUTE, MARUTHOORKONAM, KOTTUKAL P.O., BALARAMAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SANGEETH S.P., MANAGER, PUSHPAGEETH SCHOOL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION, MADHAVAN FOUNDATION, ELIMALA, KOTTOOR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. M.R.RAGHUCHANDRABAL, MANAGER, KUNJUKRISHNAN NADAR MEMORIAL TEACHERS TRAINING INSTITUTE, KANJIRAMKULAM P.O., NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. B.JAYAPRAKASH, MANAGER, M.V.TEACHER TRAINING INSTITUTE CHOWARA P.O., CHAPATH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. G.KRISHNAN, MANAGER, IFER TEACHERS TRAINING INSTITUTE, SAKETHAM, AVANAKUZHY, THANNIMOODU POST, ARALAMOODU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. L.DAIVADANAM, MANAGER, VICTORY TEACHER TRAINING INSTITUTE, NEYYATTINKARA, OLATHANNI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR SRI.G.BIJU SRI.S.JAYAPRAKASH (MADAVOOR) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION, SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR, 1ST FLOOR, CSD BUILDING, HMT POST, BANGALORE-560 031. WP(C).No. 19586 of 2009 -2- 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.V.M.KURIAN, SC, SRC-NCTE FOR R1 BY GP SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/07/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).19586/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 20th day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioners challenge Ext.P2 communication issued by the 1st respondent, National Council for Teacher Education, requiring the petitioners to produce certain documents, required for the purpose of completing the proceedings for grant of recognition under the NCTE Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that ultimately petitioners would be satisfied if a reasonable time is given for production of documents mentioned in Ext.P2. 2. I heard learned counsel for the respondents also in this regard. Petitioners shall be granted one month's time to produce the documents mentioned in Ext.P2. Other contentions of the petitioners are left open. Writ petition is disposed of as above. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs