MC 954/2008 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. M.K. Choudhury, learned Sr. Counsel assisted by Mr. K.H. Choud hruy, learned counsel for the applicant i.e. the newly impleaded respondent No. 9. I have also heard Mr. A. Sharif, learned counsel for the writ petitioner. By means of this application, the respondent No. 9/applicant has prayed for vacation of the interim order dated 28.1.2008. On perusal of the order dated 28.1.2008, it is apparent that there is no stay order passed against the respon dent No. 9 as well as the official respondents. Only provision made is to the ef fect that the election in question and the declaration of results thereof shall be subject to outcome of the writ petition. Same does not mean passing of any in terim order to the extent of debarring the respondent No. 9 to function as the P resident of the Gaon Panchayat. In other words, in terms of the said order, ther e is no bar to formally declare the election results as well as to allow the res pondent No. 9/applicant to function as the President of the Gaon Panchayat. It is ordered and clarified accordingly. This clarification/order is passed in view of the claim of the responden t No. 9/applicant that she has been declared elected as Gaon Panchayat President of No. 61 Neairgram Bagpur Gaon Panchayat. Misc. Case stands disposed of.