IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 28TH AUGUST 2008 / 6TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 36372 of 2005(E) --------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: -------------------- 1. SUGESH.C.P., S/O.C.P.DAMODARAN, AGED 26 YEARS, K.S.R.T.C. QUARTERS, A1, (PO) KALADY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. M.P.SIVARAJAN, MYLANJI PARAMBIL HOUSE, EDAPAL, THUYYAM (PO), EDAPAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. K.R.VINOD KUMAR, S/O.RAJAN, KURUPATH HOUSE, K.S.R.T.C QUARTERS C4, P.O.KALADY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. P.V.PADMANABHAN, S/O.SANKUNNI NAIR, MUDHUR HOUSE, (PO) MUDUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. S.S.SANTHOSH, S/O.S.M.SANTHOSH, K.S.R.T.C. QUARTERS, KALADY (PO), MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 6. SUBIJITH C.P., S/O.C.P.DAMODARAN, K.S.R.T.C. QUARTERS NO. A1, (PO) KALADY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE WORKS MANAGER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REGIONAL WORKSHOP, EDAPAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. MR.K.P.RIYAS BABU, TYRE RETREADER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REGIONAL WORKSHOP, EDAPAL, (PO) KALADY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. W.P.(C) NO.36372/2005 3. MR.RIYAS K., TYRE RETREADER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REGIONAL WORKSHOP, EDAPAL, (PO) KALADY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. MR.B.PRAVEEN, TYRE RETREADER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REGIONAL WORKSHOP, EDAPAL, (PO) KALADY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. ADV. SHRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN, SC, KSRTC FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.36372 OF 2005 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of August, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioners approached this Court challenging the appointment of respondents 2 to 7 as alleged temporary employees. From the counter affidavit, it is seen that the appointment is only by way of daily coolies as per the order dated 12.08.2005 of the K.S.R.T.C Chief Office. According to the petitioners, it is against Exhibit P4. It is seen that Exhibit P4 pertains only to daily wage Mechanics and Work Assistants. 2. Be that as it may, since the first respondent has acted only in terms of Office Memorandum referred to in the counter affidavit, in case the petitioners have still any grievance left, they may pursue the same in appropriate proceedings challenging the said office memorandum. This writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp KURIAN JOSEPH, J. W.P.(C) No. 36372 OF 2005 J U D G M E N T 28.08.2008