IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14200 of 2010 1. MD. JAWED AKHTAR S/O MD. NAYEEMUDDIN R/O SUKHASHAN, P.S.- SINGHESHWAR, DISTT.- MADHEPURA 2. SANTOSH KUMAR S/O ASHOK RAM R/O SUKHASHAN, P.S.- SINGHESHWAR, DISTT.- MADHEPURA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHEPURA 5. THE DISTRICT CO-ORDINATOR-CUM-DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, MADHEPURA 6. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, MADHEPURA 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, SINGHESHWAR, DISTT.- MADHEPURA 8. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER SINGHESHWAR, DISTT.- MADHEPURA 9. SMT. SAMA DEVI W/O SRI MANOJ KUMAR @ RAGHU RAI R/O VILL.- SUKHASAN, P.S.- SINGHESHWAR, DISTT.- MADHEPURA, PRESENTLY WORKING AS ELECTED MUKHIYA OF GRAM PANCHAYAT SUKHASAN, P.S. SINGHESHWAR, DISTT.- MADHEPURA 10. SMT. SUNITA DEVI W/O SRI DASHRATH THAKUR R/O VILL.- SUKHASAN, P.S. SINGHESHWAR, DISTT.- MADHEPURA, PRESENTLY WORKING AS UP-MUKHIYA OF GRAM PANCHAYAT, SUKHASAN, P.S.- SINGHESHWAR, DISTT.- MADHEPURA, PRESENTLY WORKING AS UP- MUKHIYA OF GRAM PANCHAYAT, SUKHASAN, P.S. SINGHESHWAR, DISTT.- MADHEPURA 11. SRI RAVINDRA RAM S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE THEN PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT, SUKHASAN, P.S. SINGHESHWAR, DISTT.- MADHEPURA 12. SRI AMAR NATH BHAGAT S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE THEN PANCHAYAT, GRAM PANCHAYAT SUKHASAN, P.S. SINGHESHWAR, DISTT.- MADHEPURA 13. SRI BINAY KUMAR RAM S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER PRESENTLY WORKING AS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT, SUKHASAN, P.S. SINGHESHWAR, DISTT.- MADHEPURA 14. SRI SANTOSH KUMAR S/O SRI GANESH KUMAR MEHTA R/O VILL.- SUKHASAN, P.S. SINGHESHWAR, DISTT.- MADHEPURA 15. THE DISTRICT TEACHERS EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY, MADHEPURA ----------- 2 2 3.11.2010 Appointment of two petitioners as Panchayat Teachers was set aside by the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Tribunal, Madhepura in Appeal no. 52 of 2009. Let it be noted that by that order the tribunal has set aside the appointment of nine Panchayat Teachers. The ground taken for setting aside the selection was that the Selection Committee was not properly constituted. Apart from two petitioners there being seven others, those persons had preferred writ petition before this Court being CWJC No. 10051 of 2010 and analogous cases, which were all heard and allowed by order dated 16.7.2010 by this Court ( Annexure 6). The ground in support of the order of the tribunal being the same, in my view, the judgment of this Court will equally apply to the present case as well. In that view of the matter, the order of the tribunal, which has already been set aside in respect of seven persons is also set aside for the reasons given in the earlier judgment in respect of these two petitioners as well. The writ application is allowed in the same terms, as indicated in the earlier judgment. singh ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)