In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh FAO No. M-192 of 2009 (O&M) Guptabh Parijat Lahir ... Appellant vs Jyoti .... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harmanjit Singh, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Arun Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishal Goel, Advocate, for the respondent. Rajesh Bindal J. This is an appeal filed by the husband against the dismissal of the petition filed by him for restitution of conjugal rights by the learned court below. During the pendency of the appeal, the matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre in the High Court, however, the same did not yield any result. Even in the court the efforts were made to reconcile the dispute between the parties, but the same remained fruitless. Today both the parties were present in person in court. Though as understood on the previous dates of hearing, the wife had taken an accommodation on rent. However, the husband, who is present in court, stated that considering his past experience he does not want to live with her, whereas the wife stated that she is ready to live with him unconditionally. Considering the aforesaid fact, in view of the understanding arrived at earlier, the husband shall pay a sum of ` 13,500/- to the respondent wife on account of rent for two months @ ` 5,500/- per month and ` 2,500/- paid to the broker for the accommodation taken on rent by her, where the parties were to reside. The appellant, who is present in person in court, submitted that he is not carrying the cash today. He will pay the aforesaid amount to the respondent wife in the court below on 30.10.2010 where the other petition regarding maintenance is listed. As the parties were also heard in person, considering the developments which have taken place during the pendency of the present appeal, and the stand of the appellant, I do not find that there is any merit in the present appeal. The same is dismissed. 26.10.2010 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge