HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.19275 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.10.2010 **** Krishan Chand . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. BS Sewak, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner, who is working as a Junior Assistant with the respondent-Federation and was posted at Milk Plant, Mohali, has been placed under suspension vide the impugned order dated 04.10.2010 (Annexure P2) for allegedly committing gross negligence during duty hours and his Headquarter has been shifted to Milk Chilling Centre, Jhinzrhi. (2). It is alleged that the impugned order has been passed merely because he is the office-bearer of the Workers’ Union. (3). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned transfer order at this stage. (4). However, the petitioner shall be well within his rights to represent the authorities for reinstatement and/or submit his explanation to the charge-sheet which as per the contents of the suspension order is likely to be issued to him. As and when such a representation is made, the respondents are directed to consider the same sympathetically. (5). With liberty afore-mentioned, dismissed. 27.10.2010 vishal shonkar (SURYA KANT) JUDGE