IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 25437 of 2006 Between: S. Md. Khasim, S/o. Silar Saheb, Giddalur, Prakasam District (under Suspension) ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Guntur, Guntur District. 2 The District Educational Officer, Ongole, Prakasam District. 3 The Director of School Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 4 Pidatala Saraswati, Z.P.T.C. Member, Giddalur, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or otherwise declaring the proceedings Rc.No. 5317/A2/2006 dt. 24-11-2006 and proceedings Rc.no. 8239/A1/2006 dated 25-11-2006 issued by the respondents 1 and 2 respectively, as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional violating Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same including order of the Hon'ble Tribunal dt. 29-11-2006 in OA No. 7163/2006 or alternatively suspend the proceedings Rc.No. 5317/A2/2006 dt. 24-11-2006 and proceedings Rc.no. 8239/A1/2006 dated 25-11-2006 issued by the respondents 1 and 2 respectively, pending disposal of the OA No. 7163/2006 by the Hon'ble Tribunal, and pass such other order or ordrs as it deems fit and proper Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.V.KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following : Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK} THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.25437 OF 2006 ORDER (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed): Sri P.V. Krishnaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause of action in the writ petition does not survive and therefore the writ petiton has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________________________ JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED June 19, 2008 ______________________________ JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU