IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR wmT PETITION (S) No.4 5 v 8 [zoos PETITIONER I‘Rekha Kavilas aged about 42 years The Secretary— Department of Heanh and Family Welfare, 3 ‘1 Mantra1aya, DKS Bhawan ; CoIleEtor D‘urg, Chhattisgarh Chief Medicai and Heaith Officer, District Durg Smt. B.N. Kureshi, Staff Nurse presently attaéhed to District Hospital Bemetara, District Durg Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2§6I227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA v‘“ d/o H.K.Kavilas r/o Q‘ww no 13 Bemetara, «:f;\-';&*\a\‘?~b“" ‘ District Durg w-v w“ v $5 Chhathsgarh Q‘Q. e$¢°w y ....... “c Q‘gg;xc$%”"” Versus RESPONDENTS r1. State of Chhattisgarh — Through — HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (s) No. 4503 of zoos Petitioner : Rekha Knvilus Versus Respnnden'rs : Sfa-re cf Chhn'h’isgarh & ofher-s Singls Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Jusfice swish K. Agniho‘h-i. Shri A.V. Shreedhar, Advocate for The PeTiTioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govt Advocaw for fhe responden‘l’s No. 1 1'o 3/Sfa'te. o R b E R (1?“ 5ap+emben 2006) Learned counsel appearing for fhe pe‘ri'Honer, on ins-fruc‘rions submH's tho? fhe pe'ri‘rioner wanfs 1'0 wifhdmw this pz'ri'rion with Iiberfy +0 make a represenfufion to fhe responden‘rs/ou‘rhor-Hies, +0 which learned counsel appearing for 'rhe respondenfs No. 1 +0 3/5Ta‘re has no objedion. The wri+ pefi'rion is occordingly dismissed as wi'rhdmwn wi'rh fhe above siofed liberty. In the even-r, fhe represen‘ru'fion, if so advised, is mode To fhe respondenfs/au-rhori‘ries they may do well for considering and disposing of The represenl'a'rion, wifhin o reasonable Time, preferably, wifhin a period of two weeks from the da-re of making represenfafion, in accordance wifh law, on its own merit. No order as 1'0 cosfs. ##K f we i—r’s Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge