IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No. 16486 of 2002 Between: B.Shilpa, D/o. B.Prakash Rao, minor rep. by her father and natural guardian, Sri B.Prakash Rao. R/o. H.No.5-9-468, Gunfoundry, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad. 2 The Board of Intermediate Education, rep. by its Commissioner & Secretary, Vidya Bhavan, Nampally, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus- i) declare the action of the respondents in not acceding to petitioner request to refer the answer script of petitioner daughter pertaining to intermediate English Paper-II for the year 2001-2002 to any other independent Board for revaluation as illegal and arbitrary ; ii) consequently direct the Respondents to refer the answer script of petitioner's daughter pertaining to intermediate English Paper-II for the year 2001- 2002 to any other independent Board for revaluation. Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.V.SRIHARI (not present) Counsel for Respondents : G.P. FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER: On 20.6.2005, when the matter has come up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner was absent and there was no representation on behalf of petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed on 21.6.2005 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing in the forenoon, none appears for the petitioner. The matter was passed over and again taken up in the afternoon, but none appears for the petitioner and there is no representation. The learned counsel appearing for respondents submits that no cause survives in this writ petition and it has become infructuous. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondents, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA, J Date: 21.6.2005 DA To 1 The Prl. Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Higher Education Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner & Secretary, Board of Intermediate Education, Vidya Bhavan, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3 Two CCs to the G.P. for Higher Education, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 4 Two CD copies.