IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 20TH JANUARY 2009 / 30TH POUSHA 1930 R.P.No. 55 of 2009 ------ ------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WA.2070/2008 Dated 05/11/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT: ------------------------------------------------- K.O.SEBASTIAN, KARUTHUKULANGARA HOUSE, KAYATTAMPARAMBU, NOORANI, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------------------- 1. M/S.MALABAR CEMENTS LTD., WALAYAR, PALAKKAD-678 624, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. LABOUR COURT, KOZHIKODE. R1 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.B.S.KRISHNAN (SR.) THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: A.K.BASHEER & THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JJ. ------------------------------------------ R.P.No.55 of 2009 in W.A.No.2070 of 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated, this the 20th day of January, 2009 ORDER A.K.Basheer, J. Petitioner seeks review of the judgment dated November 5, 2008 in W.A.No.2070 of 2008 contending, inter alia, that the learned Single Judge was not justified in interfering with the award passed by the Labour Court. According to the learned counsel, the Division Bench had also fallen in error in agreeing with the view taken by the learned Single Judge. We are afraid, the above contentions are totally misconceived, particularly since the contours of review jurisdiction are very narrow and well defined. We have perused the grounds raised by the petitioner in the memorandum of review petition. In the course of hearing the petitioner attempts to draw our attention to all the issues which were urged by the petitioner not only before the learned Single Judge but before the Division Bench as well. In other words, the attempt of the petitioner is only to persuade us to rehear the matter. We have no hesitation to hold that the R.P.No.55 of 2009 2 review petition is totally misconceived. Therefore, the review petition is dismissed. A.K.BASHEER (JUDGE) THOMAS P.JOSEPH (JUDGE) vns