^ \^^ [*• -f L/ * -^ .^y /v^?' o' C5*~^'lw -.-••' -^ ^0''^' ^•' ^' .•• ^y t?' F ^%^-a a f' IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETmONfS) N6 ^ 73 OF2009 Ignatius Tirkey aged about^C years S/o Late Shri K.Tirkey, Occupation: ^erviceTworking as Station House Officer, Police Station Traffic- Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhaftisgarh VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Home (Police), Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Director General of Police, Headquarters, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Police 4. Inspector General of Police, Bilaspur Range, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Superintendent of Police, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh WRrTPET!TION_UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA FGRllSSUXNeBOBWWRITORWRlTSlNTHENA-FUPiEOF MANDAMUS. C£iRtl®R«l:.EI,iBRiOHilBITION. DIRECTICiN i OR DIRECTIONS,ORDERSt>RC)RDERSORTHEUKE »ll fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B: Hon ble ShriPrashant KumarMBhra Writ Petition (S) No. 6873/2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENT8 : Ignatiys Tirkcy Versus StateofChhattisgarh and others Appearance: Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, counsel forthe petitioner. Sfari Sushil Dubey, Govemment Advocate for the State/respondents; ; WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjTIONOF INDIA ORALORDER (28.01.2011) Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the provisions contained in section 22 ofthe Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007 tiie petitioner is entitled to prefer a representation against tfae impugned transfer order passed by the State Police Establisliment Board. He would further submit that he has already preferred a representation before tfae State Govemment. However, probably in view of pendency of this writ petition the representation has been kept pending. (2) Learaed eounsel prays fcr withdrawal oftiie writ petition with liberty to prefer a fresh representation in tenns of section 22 of the Act, 2007 and farther prays for a direetion to the Stete Government to decide thesame within stipulated time. ^L. /'-• (3) In view ofthe above, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to prefer a representetion before the State Govemment in temis of section 22 (3) ofthe Act, 2007 and if such representation is filed within a period offour weeks from today the same shall be disposed of within six months, as provided under section22 (3) oftheAct, 2007. (4) The interim order granted by this court shall continue during pendency ofhis representation before the State Gbvemment. (5) The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the Uberty aforesaid. ,—— sd//- Prashartt Kumar Mishra Judge