..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.935 OF 2008 1. Shrikumar Gopinath Panniker, & 2. Naveen Gopinath Nayar. ..Applicants. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.Dilip Bodake, Adv. for the applicants. Ms.P.P.Shinde, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 22nd July, 2008. DATED : 22nd July, 2008. DATED : 22nd July, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking bail in C.R.No.159 of 2007 of Bhuinj police station, Satara. The said case is under Section 395 of IPC. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicants states that coaccused Reni Naknali Tarail Vargis Mathai has been granted bail by this Court and the case of the applicants is the same to that of the coaccused - Reni Naknali Tarail Vargis Mathai. ..(2).. This statement has not been controverted by the prosecution. Hence, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicants on the ground of parity. 4. The applicants - Shrikumar Gopinath Panniker and Naveen Gopinath Nayar to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicants shall report to Bhuinj Police Station, Satara once in a week, till conclusion of the trial. 5. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)