IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.387 of 2010 SURESH GIRI & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 14.3.2011 The Appeal under clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the High Court of Judicature at Patna has been preferred against the order dated 3.2.2010 passed in C.W.J.C.No.2072 of 2008 whereby the learned Single Judge refused to interfere with the order dated 27.9.2007 passed by the Director, Consolidation rejecting the prayer for regularization. The appellants state that they were working on daily wages in Consolidation office, Samastipur since 1986 and 1983 respectively and their plea for regularization was rejected by the Director, Consolidation by order dated 27.9.2007. The learned Single Judge while rejecting the contention of the appellants observed that a long continuance on daily wages cannot be a ground for staking claim of regularization. The learned Single Judge rightly observed that regularization visualizes an appointment against a vacant post where one has been appointed 2 KHAN against the substantive vacancy after following the procedure substantively. The appellants have not made out a case that they have been engaged against substantive vacancy or their engagement has been made after following procedure substantively. In that view of the matter, we do not find any merit in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed. (S.K.Katriar,J) (S.P.Singh,J)