IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 24776 of 1997 Between: P.Laxminarasimham, S/o late Seetharamamurthy, Sri Vishaka Grameena Bank, Bheemunipatnam, C/o Sri K.V.Rama Murthy. Advocare, Municipal Colony, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chairman, Sri Vishaka Grameena Bank, Srikakulam. 2 The Board of Directors, Sri Vishaka Grameena Bank, Srikakulam. 3 The District manager, Sri Vishaka Grameena Bank, Srikakulam. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order, prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction oe a Writ, one particularly in the nature of Mandamus declaring a) the entire domestic enquiry proceedings initiated by the 1st Respondent in pursuance of charge sheet No.D 462, dt.20-1-95 of the 1st Respondent b) order No.Dp 556/96-97 dt.30-8-96 of the 1st respondent c) order No.Dp.981/96-97 dt.24.3.97 of the 1st Respondent said to have been passed on the directions of the 2nd Respondent illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same and pass such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble may deems fit and necessary in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.SRINIVASA SARMA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.SRINIVASA MURTHY The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 24776 of 1997 ORDER: This matter was listed before this court yesterday and as the counsel for the petitioner was absent, the same was directed to be listed today under the caption for dismissal. Even today also the counsel for the petitioner is absent and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. From a perusal of the docket, it appears that this Writ Petition was dismissed for default by this court on an earlier occasion also i.e on 23.3.2007. Thereafter on an application filed seeking restoration of the Writ Petition, this Writ Petition was restored to file. Even after restoration, as stated supra, the counsel for the petitioner is absent. From all the above circumstances, it is clear that the petitioner is no more interested in getting the mater prosecuted. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs. --------------- 02.06.2009 Kvsn THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 24776 of 1997 02.06.2009 Kvsn