1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD First Appeal No.326 of 1993 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Shri S.L. Kulkarni, Advocate, for the appellant. Shri S.P. Sonpawale, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6. 1. This is an appeal by insurance company, contending that it is not liable to pay compensation along with owner, as there is a breach of terms and conditions of the policy. However, appeal is dismissed against Respondent No.7 as per order dated 17.4.2009. Learned counsel for Respondent No.7 Shri Solshe has filed a purshis on 17.3.2009, informing that he learnt that Respondent No.1 has expired. 2 2. Under the circumstances, unless Respondent No.7’s legal heirs are brought on record, this appeal would not be maintainable as the only point raised is that it is not the appellant, but Respondent No.7, who is liable to pay compensation. In this view of the matter, at the request of learned Advocate for the appellant, matter stands adjourned for a period of eight weeks for bringing legal heirs of respondent No.7 on record. In case, no steps are taken by appellant- company to bring the legal heirs of respondent no.7 on record, the apeal itself shall stand abated as a whole without back reference to the court. Date:12.06.2009 (P.R.BORKAR, J.) pnd/fa326.93 3