HIéH COURT OF CHHATTISéARH AT BILASPUR r 'ri Pei-Prr and Kumav- Sinh, 5/. Low K. R. Sinha, aged «bow 5B years, working as Pm‘mri uf P.H.No. 106-A, Raipur- Khas Dis'H', Raipur Khas, Dis'H. Ralpur (C.6.) Versus Qaspondms Shin nf Chhaffisgnrh, +hmugh in acremry. eparfmenf of Revenue. D.K.5. Bhawan, Raiput~,(C.G.) Bhikum Prasad Soni, Tahsi! Office Rnipur‘ Disfr. Rnipur. Col'ecfor, Dis'H’. Rnipur' (6.6.) " WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 225 OF THE C§§5§§IQ§§0§ Qf I§QIA sangié Bench :Hon'bxe Mr. wish K. Agnihm, J. Shri Vinod Deshmukh, dvoca're or The psi-ifionar. 5hr Vashwan? Singh Thakur, Bzpufy Advnmfe 62mm] f ‘rhz i or respandgn‘fs N Iand 2‘ a. None far fhe responden‘r Np. 3. ORAL QRDER (Passed an mis .7” stay of My, 2998) With 'Hnz conserrr af learned munse! nppaaring far fhe parties, #112 pe‘m‘ion is heard finalk. T112 pe+i+ionzr has fiied 1H5 pa+i+ion, baing aggrieved by +he order dam: 30.6.2003 (Anmxum P11), whereby. +he pemimr has been fmnsferred fram PnMari Halka No. iOé-A §aipur fa Pufwnri Haiku No. 31 Dharsiva. tn Wif Pafian g5; No4 3496 of 2008 ime N a 0 , a D s o A f @ lmrnad counsel appgaring far fhe pz‘rifioner submi1s ‘Hmf +he pafifioner dues not wanf 1'9 press fhis pa‘fi‘rion on merits, a'r fhis stage. However, fhz pefi‘l'ioner may be gran'ted liberty fa make a represen'rn'l'ian and fhe concerned au'rhori'l-y may be direcied 1'9 consider the represenfafian of we pei'i'rioner, in accordance with iaw, within a reasonable fime. l earned counsei appearing for 'i'he responden'l's/Sfa'fe submifs 'I'ha‘i' in +he eveni' represen'i'a‘fian is made by +he pefii'ioner, ihe same dmli be considered on ifs own merits, in accordance wi‘l'h law, as early as ; possible. In view of +he above, +he pefi-rion is dismissed as wifhdrawn, with fhe above-sinfed'libeni-y. No cos-rs. Sdl- Satish K. Agnihmi Judge Thakur