IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.417 of 2010 GOLU THAKUR @ JITENDRA THAKUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.3.2010 This revision application is directed against the order dated 24.2.2010 passed by Sri B.K.Verma, 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in Cr.Appeal no. 5/10 by which he dismissed the appeal and confirmed the order dated 7.1.2010 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Muzaffarpur in Trial no. 464/10 arising out of Town P.S. Case No. 509/07. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner’s name appeared in the statement of spy only and two of co-accused namely Navneet Kumar @ Pinku and Birendra Kumar Thakur @ Birendra Thakur @ Upendra Thakur have been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court vide Cr.Misc.No. 10675 of 2008 finding no T.I. parade conducted in the case who were named by co-accused in a confession. I am also of the view that once co- accused are allowed bail without help of section 12 of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act,2000, a juvenile in conflict with 2 law is entitled for the same relief. The petitioner remained in custody since 5.9.2008 which has not been cared by the Juvenile Justice Board or by 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur. This revision application is allowed and judgments and orders of both the courts below dated 24.2.2010 and 7.1.2010 are set aside. let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Muzaffarpur in Town P.S. Case No. 509/07. One of the bailers shall be petitioner’s father who shall undertake to keep the petitioner under his observation and shall produce him whenever is ordered by the Juvenile Justice Board. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)