Civil Revision No.337 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.337 of 2010 Date of Decision:05.10.2010 Amandip Kaur & anr. .... petitioners Versus Himat Singh .....respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Sandeep Bansal,Advocate for the petitioners Mr.Vikas Sagar, Advocate for the respondent **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): This revision petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 24.11.2009, whereby petitioners were denied maintenance pendente lite and their application filed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, was rejected. From the record, it was found that petitioner No.1-wife was getting unemployment allowance from the British Government and keeping in view the aforesaid fact, petitioner was asked to file an affidavit to the effect that no allowance was paid to the minor daughter i.e.petitioner No.2. In spite of three adjournments, the petitioner has failed to file the aforesaid affidavit. Counsel for the petitioners has very fairly stated that he has no further instructions regarding filing of the affidavit. Civil Revision No.337 of 2010 2 In this view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to further proceed with this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 05.10.2010 neenu