ENI Sf CPlv^t- IN THE fflGH COU&T OF CEGBATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (s) Ne. ...?..L'2......J'2C PETITIONER ^••;^.. -Sayfast Kumar Shendey, aged about 44 /s-^<^- ..-•'yesss, son of Late Shri Ghanarsia ^j'.V-'^1^ ..-• She&day Assistant Teaeher ^•••^Q^<^f Govemment Primary Schoot, Chirchari Khurd, District Rajnandgoan ^?· >v" y (C.G.) yERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretaiy Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur ^ (c'<") C^\^ /2.^District Education OfBcer, Chhuria, ^\ \^ ^Nv DistrictRajnandgaon(C.G.) ^y\ ^ \,^'' <s-" O' ^ Block Education Officer Block ^- Chhuria District —Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/2^0F THE CONSTmJTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORAM AND FOROTHER SUTTABLE WMTSAND DIRECTIONS The above named petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submitas under:- HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K A6NIHOTRI. J. WRTT PETmONfS.) N0. 464 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Hemroi Kumbhkar State of Chhatt'isgarh and o'thers WRTT PFnTION (S.) N0. 465 OF 2007 Ptetitioner Reaondents versus SiddharHi Choure State of Chhatt-isgarh and o-thers WRTT PETTTION (5.1 N0. 466 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versys Panch Ram Sohu State of Chhntt'isgarh ond o-thers WRTT PETTTION (5.1 N0. 467 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Monharon Lal Pithauro State of ChhatHsgarh ond olhers WRTT PETmON tS.) NO. 468 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Yaggoya Datt'a Baghel State of Chhattisgarh cnd o-ttiers WRTT TION (S.) N0. 469 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versys Shiki Khaperday State of Chhatt'isgarh and others werLPETmoNfs.i NO. 470 OF 2007 ^t) pt.;> Petitioner Respondents versus Radhey Kishun Patel State of Chhattisgarh ond others WWTPETmON (S.) N0. 471 OF 2007 Petil'ioner Respondents versys AAangonLul State of Chhaftisgarh and olhers WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 472 OF 2007 Petitioner Responclents versus bhal Swigh Sonwoni State of Chhattisgarh and o'thers WRTT PFTTTION (S.l N0. 473 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Onkar Lal Sonboir Storte of Chhatt'isgarh ond olhers WRTT PFTCTION (S.) N0. 474 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents wrsus Shiv Kumar Sharma State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PETmON IS.) N0. 475 OF 2007 Petrtioner Resoondents verais Rajendra Kumar Sogar State of Chhattisgarh and o'thers WRTT PFTmON (S.t N0. 476 OF 2007 Petitioner AAakhonlal Thakur versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETTTION (S.YNO. 477 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Reaiondents Foot Chand Kamleshwar State of Chhatt-isgarh and o'thers WIUT PFTCTTON (S.) N0. 478 OF 2007 Petitioner wrsus ftespondents ftcyendra Kunwr Dewongon Stnte of Chhattisgarh and o-thers And WRIT PETirtON (S.) N0. 479 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus JoycTit Kumar Shendey Stote of OthattiS9arh and o-thers 1. Present : Mr. R.K. Jcuswal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. 5ushll Dubey, 6ovemment Adwcate for rtie State/respondents. OROER (Passed on 24th Oey of Januwy. 2007) Leamed <»unsel nppearing for the petitioners as well as leomed fiovemment Advoc<rte appearhig for the State/respondents jointly submit -that -the facts ond question of law involved wi •the present batch of writ petitions ure squarely covered by the decision of this Court' in thc cose of YtishmiHt tfumw Bharadwc^ vs. Aftifc^w/ Cafpopatlon, t^sy eawi aiwrtw^. 2. In subsequent coses. i.e., Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 {jSopwsh Kumw Vwmaw. Ths State 6ovt. of Chhattiyarh and aiwrtw^ and o-ther connected nwrtters, decided by •this Sl /^ Court on 15-12-2006. pursucnt to -the memo dated 28-1-1995, isaied by the Secretary. Board of Secondary Ecbcation, Bhopal and -the prospectus of biploma in Education Examination. it was ckirified Ihat -the nomenclature of the Basic Training InstfhJte, i.e., B.T.I. has been chcnged ond renamed as tiiploma in EAicotion, i.e., t).Ed. Accordmgty, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 ^Gopesh Kumar Vermavs. The State Sovt. of Chhatti^arh and aiwthei) (Supra). 3. For -the aforementioned reouions, -the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the motter of Ycahwcffif Kumar Bharadwaj\Suiprd}, subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.T.I./tS.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circukirs dated 24-12-1998 ond 1-3-1999 ond further triie'ther •they have been paid two advance mcrements or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of this order be ploced on •the record of the conneeted writ oetitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006C[I)WJR-C696 Thakur