HIGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH AT BILASPUR FRiT PETITiON (S) No. 3041 of 2007 Petitjoners 1. 2. 3. ^•' 9. Versus 1. 2. Devnarayan Das Vaishnav S/o. Shri Vyasnarayan Vaishnav, Aged abcut 48 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary Schooi, Kokpur, Block-Dongargaon, Distt.-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) AlalSingh Pisda S/o. Shri Ankalu Ram Pisda, Aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Hlgh Scliool, Asra, Biock- Dongargaon, Distt.-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Diieshwar Ram Shandilya S/o. Shri Salikram Shandiiya, Aged about 42 ysars, Assistant Teacher, Go\'t. Boys Primary School, Asra, B!ock - Dongargao", Distt.-Rajnandgao" (C.G.) Lekhram Sahu S/o. Shri Jogiram Sahu, Aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Kesfa, Block- Dongargaon, Distt.-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Rameshchandra Sahu S/o, Shri Nakuiram Sahu, Aged about 40 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Ghorda, Block-Dongargarh, Distt.- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Sadhuram Sahu S/o. Shri Mangiudas Sahu, Aged about 46 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. PrimarySchool, Singapur, Biock-Dongargaon, Distt.- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Mehetram Sahu, S/o. Ankalur Das Sahu, Agsd about 47 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Kesla, Block- Dongargaon, Dlstt.-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Lokeshwar Sao S/o. Shri Chandrashekhar Sao, Aged about 51 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary Schoo!, Gendatoai, Block- Dongargaon, Distt.-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Tuisidas Bidani S/o. Luluram Bidani, Aged about 44 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Bijepar, Block- Chhuria, Distt.-RaJnandgaon (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Schooi Eduisation Department, Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Coilectorate, Rajnandgaon, Distt.- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VVRiT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTmjTION OF INDIA SingleBench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Tna^ Fresent: Shri Ravi Maheshwari, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Vinay Pandey, Panei Lawyer for the State / respondents. ORDER (Passed on lTBrda7of May, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and question of law invoived in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipai Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (il) MPJR-CG 98}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Learned counsel appearing ror the respondents does not controvert the said submission. Accordingly, the writ petition is ailowed in terms of fhe order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.I. Examination Certificates on their own expenses as per the circuiars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge