’ BILASPUR (cs4 W PETITIONER 1. Yarkumar Patel S/o Late lshwar PateL aged about 22 years, R/o Village- Tapranga, PO- Dhourabahata Tahsil- Ghargodha, Distt-Raigargh(CG) Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, General Administration Department D.K.S Bhavan Raipur (CG) Raigarh Dist- 2. Coilector Raigargh(CG) ‘3. Sub Divisional Officer Gharaghoda, Distt-Raigargh (CG) 4. Jindal- Steel and Power Limited Through Managing Director P.B.No 16, Kharsia Road, Raigarh (CG). 5. Jindal Coal Mines Through Manager Jindal Coal Mines ’Dounga Moha, Gharaghoda, Distt- Raigarh (CG) IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATISGARH AT WRIT PETITION s No. EIC OF 2011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTEgGARl-I AT BELASPUR SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRI'HNKER DIWAKER w.P.{S).No. 7819/201 1 Shn' K.K.Pandey, counssl for the petitioncr. ShrLNNaha Roy, P.L. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 225 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (16.12.2011) Counsel for the petitioner submits that pulpose of filing this petition would be served if the petitioner is permitted to Withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the respondent NO.4 along with copy of letter dated 8,6.201 1 (Annexure P/ 1 1) issued by the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Gharghoda, Raigarh. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to Withdraw this petition. Needless to state that in the eventuality of tiling any representation] application by the petitioner, the same would he dealt with by the competent. authority in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation/ application strictly in accordance with law. The petition is thus dismissed as Withdrawn. i Sd/— l Pritinker Diwaker Judge PETITIONER Yarkumar Patel Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh 8a Others