IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10054 of 2010 SHEO BALAK RAM, S/o Gopi Ram. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 31.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 25(1-B) A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner is named in the First Information Report after recovery of some arms from his house pursuant to the confessional statement of the co-accused in Mairwa P.S. Case No. 100 of 2009 instituted for the offences under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. In view of the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 20.08.2009 and apart from these two cases there is no other case pending against him, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Mairwa P.S. Case No. 102 of 2009 2 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. The Magistrate before releasing the petitioner on bail will verify the fact that the petitioner is accused only in the present case and Mairwa P.S. Case No. 100 of 2009. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)