w \A M“ PETITIONER f3 ' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRET PETETION (C) NO. 2734 OF 2009 Pawan Kumal Chanani, aged about 53 years, son of Late Kanhaiya Lal Chanani.f Rio AIS 110, Agyey Nagar, Biiaspur, District Bilaspur (CG). Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Mines and Mineral Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The Collector (Mines and Mineral Department), Janjgir, District Janjgir'- Champa (CG). Mining Officer (Mines and Minerai Department), Celiectorate Office, Janjgir, District Janjgir—Chamapa (CG). RESPONDENTS (Writ petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution of lndia) Singie Bench : Hon‘bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Vishnu Koshta, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 15'“ ‘day of July, 2009) Heard learned counsei for the parties. Shri Koshta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that pursuant to show cause notice dated 11-9-2008 (Annexure — P18), the petitioner has already submitted his reply to the same on 15-9-2008 (Annexure — P/9) and thereafter again ion 13-3—2069 (Annexure —- PI10). No decision has been taken by the competent authority on the reply filed by the petitioner. Shri Sao, learned,€:"ovt. Advocate appearing for the $tate, submits that the competent authority will take decision on the reply eubmitte’d by the petitioner, in accordance with iaw, as early as possible preferably within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner nothing remains in this writ petition for adjudication. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihgtrj Judge ;