1 Lrs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No.129/2010 Abhijit Marketing Pvt Ltd. ..Petitioner. vs. Municipal Corpn.of the City of Nashik and Ors. ..Respondents. Mr G.S.Godbole i/b Ms Manjiri Parasnis for the Petitioner. Mr M.L.Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr S.N. Patil, A.G.P., for Respondent No.2. CORAM: D.K. DESHMUKH AND A.R.JOSHI,JJ DATED: 12TH JANUARY,2010 P.C.:- 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is willing to make a detail representation to the Respondent-Corporation in relation to delivery of possession of the final plot which according to the petitioner has been allotted to his predecessor-in-interest under the sanctioned town planning scheme. 2 2. We have heard the learned counsel for the Corporation. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in our opinion, the following order would meet the ends of justice: ORDER In case, the petitioner makes a representation to the respondent Corporation for delivery of possession of the final plot which according to the petitioner was allotted under the sanctioned Town Planning Scheme to his predecessor- in-interest. The Corporation shall hold an inquiry in accordance with law and communicate its decision on the petitioner s representation, as expeditiously as possible, in any case, within a period of two months from the date on which the petitioner submits representation. All contentions of both sides are kept open. Similarly, all remedies that may be available to the petitioner are also kept open against the decision of the Corporation. (D.K. DESHMUKH,J) (A.R.JOSHI,J)