IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 16407 of 1994 Between: Mareppa, S/o. Venkappa, Allampally Toddy Shop Counter No.3, Makthal Range, Mahabubnagar. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Excise Superintendent, Mahaboobnagar. 2 Deputy Commissioner of Excise, Mahabubnagar. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent in Rc.No.B3/486/1994 dated 22/03/1994 relating to panchanama and COR No.19/93-94 dated 20/12/1993 in respect of the petitioner's licence as illegal, arbitrary, void high handed, against principles of natural justice, violative of Articles 14 of the Constitution of India and direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to carryon the business consequentially suspend the operation of the impugned proceedings in Rc.No.B3/486/94 dated 22/03/1994 passed by the 1st respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.T.A.GOUD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the subject matter of this writ petition has become infructuous and there is no lis to be adjudicated. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ___________________ (G. CHANDRAIAH, J.) 11th July, 2005 bcj To 1 The Excise Superintendent, Mahaboobnagar. 2 Deputy Commissioner of Excise, Mahabubnagar. 3 Two C.Cs. to the Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 4 Two C.D. copies.