IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 76 OF 2007 PRADEEP SAHEBRAO NAIKNAVARE ..PETITIONER V/S SHREE DATTA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK VA BAHUUDDESHIYA MANDAL & ORS. ..RESPONDENTS MR. I.M. KHARDI, ADVOCATE, FOR THE PETITIONER. MR. D.W. BHOSALE, ADVOCATE, FOR THE RESPONDENT NOS. 1 & 2. MR. D.A. PATIL AGP. CORAM: J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 16TH APRIL, 2008. DATE : 16TH APRIL, 2008. DATE : 16TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement that this petition was filed on the allegations of breach of interim order passed in Appeal No. 373 of 2004. However later on that Appeal was dismissed and even writ petition against that order also came to be dismissed. In view of this, no purpose would be served by proceeding with the present contempt petition. In the result, the contempt petition stands dismissed. (J. H. BHATIA, J) (J. H. BHATIA, J) (J. H. BHATIA, J)