--, (sc -~\ Dwarika Prasad Choudjtiarv, aged jTlTTL^->ni+ <1/1 ^ ^7£ff'^T*c^ cl //"^ ?^ 7'y~k'* y?^11"r:r^ Choudhar^', workuig as Upper Divisioil T^es.clicr &t Oovex'o.iiisiit Migner yeconaary yciiool, j^omii, Rlo^'U- OttthhT^ ni<aff. .Tamcf-sr O.I-sptTt-iD.ct ^-<-^ ^...^^.^.^, ^.-.^^^-J^.u^ -^. ,,.^^.,_--^^j--^.- ^•L/.<JT), I\/0 VUitAge fS.OUXi.l, DiOCK Uablira, Distt.tJanigir Cnainpa. 1 State ot Ctiliattisgarn: llirough Qo^~i-r*<:.+i-Tnr C,'/->T-i/Ti^~i,1 T^/'il-s/^'-i-i-T/^ft uepaament, uivM unawaii, Kaipui- (CG). '2. 'ltie Uu'ecior, ruDiic lustTLicUons, Cliattisgarn, Headquarter Kaipur ir' n\ ^.u,. 3. DISUICT tiducanon Umcer, Jaiiigu- Chaispa (C.G). r'int?fffiiTtTJTtrTT?r»iCT r%y? ?w?^?_& Silri K.K. Kesnarwani, counselfor Uie petltioner. Snri Ajay Dwiveai, Uy.G.A., appears Ibr tiie State. (14. n'? Heard. TJie petitioner wtio is worldng on mp post ot Upper Uivision 'I eacher has been tranaterred. froin Ooveniment Higner Secondary School Kotmi, Block Dabnra, Distt. Jaiijgu' Champa to Uie opUoa ot tbe Disttict Educanon Otticer, daELigir Chaiupa tor ius turther postaig on adnunistrative grounds. Leanied counsel tor ttie petinoner argues ttiat tfie order of traiister is laalatide. On beiag pouitedlv asfeed trom leai-ned couiisel tbr ttie pennoner that since when tbe petitioner is worlaaR ttiere at Kotmi, leanied couiisel subniits that he is not able to tell tie exact date but f&e peTitioner is posted at Kotmi snice lonp. It is not disputed hi Uiis case Uiat tjie post held by tiie petitioner is a transterable post. The Apex Court wiiile clealing witll the inatter of Metutriyci -vs- w^,' SCw SS6S retemng to various decisions Iias observed vide para 4 as tollows: "Traaster wtiicb is aa uicidence of serv^e is not to be intenerect wifb. bv the Courts unless it is shown to be ciearly arbitrary or vitiated by iiialafide or iafcictioa of asy prescnDea nonns ot pruiciple goveniiug me U'ansler (See Ambaiii Santff. Ra^ vs. State of Orissef. Unless the order ol u'ansler is vinatca oy niciia j'lcie or iy uiauc ui vioiauon 01 operative guideliiies, uie Court cannot iuterfbre \vith. it fSee Union cfInSia. Vs. S.L. AbSsas). Who should fce traasferred aucl posted wnere is a inatter lor the adiiunistrative aut&onty fa<^iri?1 TTT>1?a'c;1^ 1(-^ifa QTH ^T" <^'T tT''^Ticif<:aT* "'". ^7'?'H'^t'fsf;! ^t7 Trt'^T'^'FT^r' ^•k^i fr-&.^*A.t--L^'^/^fl- n/~ T A^^t^/I-A.^-^ArA.'t-^.lu' or is ruade in violation of operative aiiy guideliaes or rules the Courts shoiild not. ordiiiarily iaterfere 'vith it. Jn t?re*®n ttj ^ndia £BE oEners ys. i/cu'ierseKu't Keaan.uEft & la't.ut.rter, it was observed as .ibiiows: "No Goveniineat servant or einployee ofa pubtic ^ci+F'rl •f^r-f^^f^T r>t \^Sf tA/i-i- -i-i^''revi uildertakitig has aay legal right to be po; aay one parucular place or piace 01 nis cnoice suice transfer of a particular einployee appoiated to fh.e ciass or categoiy or tiansteraDle posts iroiu oue place to another is not only aii incident, but a condition of servlce, necessaiy too iu pubiic interest and euicicucy ui fhe public adiniuistration. Unless aa order ot trsiisfer is shown to be aa Qutooine cf mala fide exercise or statea to De m violauoii 01 statutorv TiT'Qi7icii/^T>Ci r^-j"<\}TtT^-t'j-Trbi^r ,o-T>-^r oil'T'T"* tTyy*c^-^aT' f^'f^ r~t<^1^Tt'c'. OT ¥-LlL?-».</r-i^^w? r -' E ~^ Jr ^ ?_ ? L J *- l- a ; ^ ^ 4^-i.A. ^ •Zj ^«.^/J.A i^—<^^L-fchul-L'*u-A.^ ^i-r-k-*^ ^-•'"^/4^LA-a^^^ th-rtA ttie Inounats noiinaUy caiuiol lutenere witn sucn orders as a niatter of routine, as though tfaey were fhe appeUate auuioriaes subsututuig ilieit- own declsion for fhat of tlie employee/ inanagenient, as agam.st such orders passed ia the isterest of 03 exigencies ot t&e service concenied. Itie posiuoa was Iufifliti£?litef3- Isv tliis Court iu T^c.iiQTiCt] ffyfSroe^ff-ctfic rower (Jorpn. Ltd. vs. ,->nn tsn.agwan." In view ol tfae above position of law cteclared by the Supreine Court, I do not liad any reason to iatertere wlth the order of traaster of petitioner as the counsel tbr tfae petitioner could not inake out a case eiuer ot inalatides or of extraneous consideratioa or violation of any statutory rules or ttie Act. T'he petitlon is not wortti adiaission; the saxue deserves to be ——— —_h_ _ aiicl is accoixliaglv aisniissed. no costs. i&^ Sd/- SunUKumarSinha Judge