IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28376 of 2010 DHARMVIR SINGH, S/o Janardan Singh. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 24.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 447, 384, 387, 307, 302 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Considering that the case is at fag end and it appears from the impugned order that the trial was closed whereafter the prosecution filed a list of three witnesses to be examined for which the date was fixed for their appearance on 07.06.2010. On the said date the accused persons filed a petition that they would file a revision with the obvious intent to delay the trial for purposes of this application. Considering the same, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The Trial Court shall not give unnecessary dates to the accused persons. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)