Crl.M.No.M-2320 of 2011(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-2320 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: July 5, 2011 Mange Ram .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr.Anshuman Dalal, Advocate for the complainant. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.29, dated 15.2.2009, registered under Sections 302, 307, 449, 506, 120-B, 34 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, at Police Station Beri. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is about 85 years of age and that neither any overt act nor any injury has been attributed to him and he has been implicated just on the plea that he conspired with co-accused to commit the offence. It is further contended that petitioner has been continuing in custody since 13.2.2009 and all the material witnesses have already been examined. These facts have not been disputed by learned State counsel as Crl.M.No.M-2320 of 2011(O&M) -2- well as by counsel for the complainant. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. In view of these facts and the fact that petitioner is an old aged person, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner-Mange Ram for grant of regular bail is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Jhajjar. 5.7.2011 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge