IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24725 of 2010 VIMAL YADAV . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3 18.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is in custody in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 96 of 2009 for offences under sections 419,420,409,467,469 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, lodged on the report of the B.D.O. Petitioner is husband of Mukhiya and it is alleged that he along with others defalcated Rs.689350/- allotted for different Government schemes. The petitioner submits that he has been falsely implicated in this case and he happens to be husband of Mukhiya. He is no way connected with any scheme and Panchayat secretary is custodian of the records and all Government works are executed by him. State counsel submits that F.I.R. was lodged after enquiry conducted by the B.D.O. in which he has been named. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected for the present. Devendra/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)