IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2009 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 10402 of 2009(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MANU K.P. S/O. LATE POULOSE, KANIYAMOL, KARICODE, MULANTHURUTHY. BY ADV. SRI.PAUL MATHEW (PERUMPILLIL) SRI.P.V.SREENIJIN SMT.K.B.SONY SRI.PRASUN.S SRI.SANU.S.PANICKER SRI.K.T.BOSCO RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE MULANTHURUTHY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MULANTHURUTHY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 10402 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 31st March, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext. P14 order, whereby the respondent has directed the petitioner to close a window constructed by the petitioner in the building adjacent to a building of his neighbour. According to the petitioner, the violation complained of in Ext. P14 is non-existent. I am not inclined to entertain a challenge against Ext. P14 in this writ petition since the petitioner's remedy lies in challenging the same in an appeal as provided in the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act. Therefore, without prejudice to that right, this writ petition is dismissed. However, to enable the petitioner to file an appeal and seek interim order, I direct the respondent not to implement Ext. P 14 for a period of two weeks. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.