(^ -HC—78 '^sf ^ww^, ^xii-y^Ko, fs«rti<i^< *11*1CTI «»N|C?» "^200 3TI^?T TWF (^3^^) ^y^ R^ioh WT^n^T »i^lcr» ^:?ffW^f?^3^i <^M?<vt<ill 'RTR^Jt ^ ft^ iPfl^K ^'3tfilH^H^T WP<s)NO. 490 OF 2009 PetitipnCT Laxmi Nar|ayan Mahfle, aged about 57 years, son of Late SI^ri Shiv Ram Prasad Mahile, Prcsenfly working jas Revenue Inspector, Ambagarh Chouki, | Sub Division Mohala, District Rajnaiidg^on (CG) VNsus Respondents ^ State of C((r, fhrough fhe Secretaxy, Department of Reven^e, Dau Kalyaa Singh Bhawaa, Mantralay^ 2. Commissiotier 3. CoUector, Ej Raipur (CG) (Laad Records) Raipur» [istt. Rajnandgaon (CG) 4. Sub Divisiolnal Ofi&cer, Sub Division Mohla, Distt Rajnandga^n (CG) 5, Krishna K4mar Siagh, aged about 58 years, son of not kao^n, Presenfly attached wifh the charge of Revenue plnspector, Sub Division Mohala, Distt. Rainaadeadn (CG} Writ petition under Article 3S26 ofthe Constitution oflndia S.B Hon»bleShri Dhirendra Miihra. J 27.1.2009 Ms. Pushpa Dwivedi, learaeti coiinsel for fhe petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jahi, leamed PL| for the State. The petitioner, by fhe msta4t petition, has prayed for direction to the respondent authonties to con^ply wifh fhe order dated 30.12.2008 (Annexure P/4) whercby it has [been directed to give the petitioner k XI-HC—78 'TST ^i^Kn^, yxil^i^Ko, fc«ni-(H^< *iWVM ^^,q,"-—"-"--—•••••••••••••••—••"•••^^200 ^n^r Tra^ (^35^) 3??^l'SFI f^W "W? W^T'^qtsF ^ I. 1 iiinllNNIli' ^ l^nwn^s^"^ 2^ orddr, difcte. fi^sb charge of Revenue Inspector, revocation of his suspension not been complied wifh even till Ms. Sunita Jaia, leamed ia case the petitioner files a grievances raised in this petition ^long fhe CoUector, Rajnatidgaon/res|)ondent considered aiid decided by resp<j>3 weeks from fhe date ofreceipt off{ie In view of above subniissio4 mstaat petition is disposed of fresh representation for redress^l petition, along wifh copy of this such representation beiag niade^ decided by respondent No.3 on it^ withia a furfher period of two representatlon. wlth <^s^?^t^ll 'HTR^Tf ^* 'fe<St <F»l^i< '^3^PT3?T^T Division-Aiabagarh Chouki, after , as fhe order ofAnnexurc P/4 has PLj appearing for fhe State submits fhat representation for redrcssal of his ^long wifh copy ofthis petition before No.3, the same shall be »<j>ndent No.3 wifhin a period of two representation. oflearaed counsel for fhe State, fhe Uberty to fhe petitioner to file a «s^l of his grievances raised in this Ipetition before respondent No,3, On fhe same shaU be considercd and own merits in accordaace wifh law froia fhe date of rcceipt of fhe it^ wbeks Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge 4-