IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal IV Bail Application No. 6 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Kamal Qurashi ……Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand -----Opposite party Arising out of Case Crime No. 193/08, U/Ss 379/411 IPC, PS Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar Dated: July 1, 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Manish Arora, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. GA for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that he is entitled to be extended the benefit of Section 437(6) Cr.P.C. in view of the fact that his trial is not completed within sixty days from the first date fixed for taking evidence in the case. He further submitted that in the present case the charge was framed on 16.3.2009 thereby fixing the next date for 28.3.2009. A copy of the order sheet dated 3.6.2010 of the trial court has been produced today in the Court, a perusal of which reveals that the trial has yet not been concluded, rather the prosecution evidence is continuing before the trial court. As such, it was prayed by learned counsel that the applicant is entitled bail as per Section 437(6) Cr.P.C., inasmuch as the trial is to be completed within 60 days from the first date fixed for taking evidence in the case. After considering all the facts and circumstances, perusing the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record as well as perusing the order sheet filed by the applicant, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Kamil Qurashi be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of JM, Roorkee, District Haridwar. The fourth bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 01.07.2010 Rajeev Dang