IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Rev. No. 738 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 29, 2011 Daya Chand and others ................................................... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ......................................... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Sailender Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 7.3.2011 whereby the petitioners have been summoned in application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for facing trial in F.I.R. No. 86 dated 14.11.2009 under Sections 148/149/323/325/506 and 307 IPC registered at Police Station Rohrai, District Rewari. Counsel for the petitioners has vehemently argued that on the basis of statement made in the Court the petitioners could not be summoned to face the trial. From the contents of the F.I.R. and the M.L.R. (Annexure P5), it is clear that specific role has been attributed to the petitioners for inflicting injuries to the complainant. No merit. Dismissed. 29.3.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE