IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2011 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1933 OP(C).No. 1180 of 2011(O) ------------------------------------ OS.1589/1994 of I ADDL.SUB COURT, THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER --------------------- HASSAN, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O. KARUVATH ABDU HAJI, VETTATHUR AMSOM AND DESOM, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. ABUNNY @ ABOOBACKERS AGED 59 YEARS, S/O. THERUVATHVEETTIL PATTAH BAVA, MARUTHAYUR DESOM, PAVARATTY AMSOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, TRISSUR 680 507. 2. MUHAMMEDUNNY, S/O. THERUVATH VEETTIL, KUNHIMODIU, MARUTHAYOOR DESOM, PAVARATTY AMSOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK 680 507. THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss P. BHAVADASAN, J. ........................................... O.P(C).NO.1180 OF 2011 ............................................. Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2011. JUDGMENT The limited prayer in this writ petition is for a direction to the Sub Court, Trissur to take up I.A.No.1885/2006 in O.S.No.1589/1994 and dispose of the same in accordance with law as early as possible. 2. The petitioner instituted O.S.No.1589/1994 before the Sub Court, Thrissur. The said suit was one for specific performance of an agreement of sale having an extent of 39 1/3 cents of land in Sy.No.31/17 in Pavaratty Village. After the decree, the petitioner filed various proceedings by way of appeal etc. It is stated that the petitioner got the document executed. It is claimed by the petitioner that except the structures in the property, rest of the property had been delivered. Grievance of the petitioner is that Ext.P8 application for advancing the hearing of I.A.No.1885/2006 is pending without passing orders and a direction may be issued for an early disposal of the same. 3. In the light of the order which I propose to pass, no O.P(C).NO.1180 OF 2011 : 2 : notice to the respondents is necessary since none of their rights are affected. Suffice to say that the petition filed as early as in 2006 is still pending without no justifiable reasons. I refrain from saying anything in the matter. Grievance of the petitioner is genuine. In the result, the original petition is allowed. There will be a direction to the Sub Court, Thrissur to take up I.A.No.1885/2006 in O.S.No.1589/1994 as early as possible and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/= P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE. cl /true copy/ P.A. to Judge.