IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7499 of 2009 Date of Decision: January 29, 2010 Dharminder Singh. ...Petitioner Versus Smt. Surjit Kaur. ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present: Mr. L.M. Gulati, Advocate, for the petitioner. S.D. Anand, J. The learned Trial Court allowed a plea raised by the respondent – wife for conducting the medical test of the petitioner – husband in order to find out whether he is an HIV patient or not. The respondent – wife had raised that plea, in the course of the matrimonial tussle, with a view to get evidence supportive of the averment that the petitioner - husband is an HIV positive patient and is thereby open to the allegation of having caused cruelty to her. The averment made by the petitioner – husband at the trial was to the contrary. It being beyond the pale of controversy that the respondent - wife has made a precise allegation of cruelty on an averment that the petitioner – husband is an HIV positive patient, the medical examination of the latter could be the best piece of evidence to find out the correctness or otherwise of the grievance of the respondent – wife. The learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, very fairly states that he is not in a position to assail the impugned order on any valid count. The petition shall stand disposed of accordingly. January 29, 2010 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge