S C I 3 , V a 4.’ t C7( .oJr a - ./ C. -r t cv •a I.o.u r tire_it. t• •i• £ (B •ri. V. 9t .’, t’ V 3 rt. r •! ge • ‘ P3 1 : rjq,-s. r ‘icr svtl.1as • tJ C I’ y 4_sn -)-‘- t’ar 4• 3_ai1 end b’ ,a a r x —‘) by ft-’.,- -f r It . t-1 •. ‘ttra r - ‘t-”rs c”rt - fr ..rr, j C t aett e i. 47W• S. On tat sltrt croun4, cli se writ petitions bagc to bc illo”-d. 2. ib :ric vanes of the petitioncrs are that, the respondent herein grantcd occupancy ri hts by its order dated 13.8.81 vW A.’xXUr a. 5 on that date, unlisputedly, t :msband of te petitioner n r • :ze died on 6.8.1974. 2o mibst”intiatc this fact, the peti tion r has produced the deat’i certificate at Afl’) xiire-fl. Therefore, tie order passed by t’ie second reondent - Land fribuial against a dead person is a nullity in the eye of la”. iii’ — a y.Ps.l5’G)/94 L 1.5 fl’, - : :., 1 1 1. counsol for tie petitioner suixtits that on this ground alone, the iqugneti order ja liatQp to be quasivd. The second subni asian i: t’iat, respondents 1 and ¶3 after dis pos.1 of porn :io.7, filed an application aftrr a long 1ap of 11 years tetig anfnd’nent to Torn Ho.? and to a n.’ thc’ ar’ by ‘.nL. the correct gydos. in re cpect of ‘hick occu pancy rights ‘tre sought to be grantcd in their f 4 vour. ¶3. The learned counsel subtits that he application is not naintainable or tie reason that beyond the linitation prescribed bj tLo ‘)V rn’rtt t, nit :i TQ,? k— cations clainin, occupancy rignts in respect of tcnancy lards was exircd on 30. .1979. 3. I at satisfied that the inpugned order passed by tile Tribunal ‘ma ginnt tie hus band o tie 1 etitioner iaho ies no nire as on the date o” tic inpugncd orc’er. Itenco, fle inpugnerl order is nullity in the eye of la”. In so far as th anenincnt aprlicatiwm is concerned, this court till not expre $3 its opinion ‘4th regard to its malntaingbility,as ‘I’ 1% W.Ps.l5260/94 & 15261/- :4: the cage ig being remitted back to the prl— bunal for consideration. Hence, I pass the following order: The it Petitions are allowed, R1e made absolute. The impugned orders at .fln exure-A and B are hereby auashed. The matter is remitted back to the respondent Tribunal for fresh consideration after giving notice to both the contesting parties and determine the rights of the parties in accordance with law including the andinent application and the claim petition byespondents I and 2 within six months from the date of receipt of thIs order, Sal çJ L ‘... I. /vgh i L