CRM-M-29181-2011 [ 1 ] CRM-M-25665-2011 :::::::: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (1) CRM-M-29181-2011 Date of decision:29.09.2011 Jatinder Kumar Mahajan @ Sonu ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents (2) CRM-M-25665-2011 Date of decision:29.09.2011 Jatinder Kumar Mahajan @ Sonu ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Vikas Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. K.D.Sachdeva, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. S.S.Goraya, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This order shall dispose of two petitions, i.e. CRM-M-29181-2011 titled as `Jatinder Kumar Mahajan @ Sonu Vs. State of Punjab and another' [hereinafter referred to as the “first petition”] and CRM-M-25665-2011 titled as `Jatinder Kumar Mahajan @ Sonu Vs. State of Punjab' [hereinafter referred to as the “second petition”] as both the petitions have arisen out of the FIR No.92 dated 03.07.2008, registered under Sections 279, 337, 338, 427 of IPC at Police Station Rajasansi, District Amritsar. The first petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of CRM-M-29181-2011 [ 2 ] CRM-M-25665-2011 :::::::: Criminal Procedure, 1973 [for short “Cr.P.C.”] for seeking quashing of the aforesaid FIR (Annexure P-1) with all the consequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 16.09.2011 (Annexure P-2) and the second petition has been filed under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Harjit Singh (complainant), respondent No.2 in the first petition, is present in the Court who has been identified by his counsel Shri S.S.Goraya, Advocate. In this case, the complainant/respondent No.2 had received injuries in a vehicular accident who has been compensated by the petitioner by paying him `35,000/-. Hence, the complainant/respondent No.2 has compromised the matter with the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even non- compoundable offences can be compounded in terms a Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and others, 2007(3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 1052. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record, the first petition, i.e. CRM-M-29181-2011, is hereby allowed and the FIR No.92 dated 03.07.2008, registered under Sections 279, 337, 338, 427 of IPC at Police Station Rajasansi, District Amritsar (Annexure P-1) alongwith all the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed in terms of the compromise dated 16.09.2011 (Annexure P-2). In view of the fact that the FIR itself has been quashed, the second petition for grant of anticipatory bail, i.e. CRM-M-25665-2011, has become infructuous and is dismissed as such. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of the another connected case. September 29, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE