IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 17521 of 2008 Between: Kusureddy Satyavathi, D/o. Late Kannayamma, R/o. Kondagokiri Village, Koyyuru Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Sub-Collector, Paderu, Visakhapatnam District. 2 The Tahsildar, Koyyuru, Visakhapatnam District. 3 Kudumula Narayana Rao, S/o. Not known to the petitioner, R/o. Kondagokiri Village, Koyyuru Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 4 The Joint Collector, Visakhapatnam District at Visakhapatnam .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not considering and disposing of the revision ﬁled against the orders of the 2nd respondent in not considering and disposing of the revision ﬁled against the orders of the 2nd respondent in OR Appeal No. 2/2005, dt. 5-10-2007 as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents not to evict the petitioner from the lands to an extent of Ac. 3.80 cents in Sy.No. 53/1 of Kondagokiri Village, Koyyuru Mandal, Visakhapatnam District pending disposal of the revision before the 4th respondent in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. K. VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 17521 of 2008 Oral order: As against the order dated 05.10.2007, passed by the 1st respondent, namely the Sub Collector, Paderu, Visakhapatnam, the petitioner states that he preferred revision petition before the 4th respondent, namely the Joint Collector, Visakhapatnam, and the same having been registered as R.P. No. 8 of 2008 is pending consideration, and is posted for hearing to 27.09.2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4, and considering the fact that the revision petition ﬁled by the petitioner is pending consideration before the 4th respondent, both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions Until the 4th respondent, namely the Joint Collector, Visakhapatnam, considers and disposes of the revision petition ﬁled by the petitioner, status quo obtaining as on today shall be maintained. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 14th August, 2008. KSR ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RLD}