IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 428 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5849 OF 1995 WRIT PETITION NO. 5849 OF 1995 WRIT PETITION NO. 5849 OF 1995 Smt. Ansari Naz Mohammed Bashir Ahmed.... Petitioner versus Jadeed Anjuman-e-Taleem’s and otehrs ...... Respondent. Mr. B.V.Bukhari for the petitioner Mr. Anil Kumar Patil for Respondents 1, 2 & 5 Mr. Prathamesh i/b Mr. A.V.Anturkar for Respondents 3,4,6,7 & 8. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 30TH MARCH, 2007 DATED; 30TH MARCH, 2007 DATED; 30TH MARCH, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. On account of absence of the learned counsel for the original petitioner when the matter was called out on 24-11-2006 the petition came to be dismissed for default. By the present Civil Application a prayer is made for condoning the delay in filing of the application which is of 30 days and a further prayer to restore the writ petition to file. The reasons spelt out in the application for non appearance of the learned advocate is that he was held up in some other court and hence cound not remain present as and when the matter was calld out. For the reasons stated in the application coupled with the no objection on the part of the advocate representing the respondent, C.A. is allowed. Writ petition is restored to file. ...