IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1469 of 2007 MD.GYASUDDIN @ MD.GAYAS SON OF LATE SHAHIDUR RAHMAN, R/O- DOGHARIA, P.S.- DAGARWA, DISTRICT- PURNEA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MD.MOJIB SON OF LATE ILYAS, R/O- VILLAGE- DOGHARIA, P.S.- DAGARWA, DISTRICT- PURNEA. For the petitioner : Mr. Nasrul Huda Khan, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP. ----------- 3 24.08.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner is the informant. He is aggrieved by the order of conviction recorded only under minor sections of the Penal Code by the learned trial court in Sessions Trial No. 866 of 2005. It is stated that the wife of the informant (Rasina Khatoon, P.W. 3) was assaulted by means of fat on right ear. The doctor found the injury serious enough. I have perused the deposition of P.W.3 (victim) and the Doctor (P.W. 8). Learned Trial Court rightly found that charge under Section 307IPC has not been proved. This Court does not find any patent illegality in the consideration of the matter by the learned trial court under the impugned order. There is no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )