IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.12724 of 2011 Date of Decision.21.07.2011 M/s Sumer Chand & Sons, Mohan Tower, Commercial Complex, Wazidpur Industrial Area, Delhi-110052, through its partner Kamal Aggarwal son of Shri Chand Kishore Aggarwal .....Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab through its Principal Secretary, Department of Irrigation, Mini Secretariat, Sector 9, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-4), which has been issued on behalf of the petitioner claiming the amount for the works done, is considered by the addressee and appropriate decision is taken regarding the payment. The representation shall be presented again along with copy of this order within a week from the date of receipt of copy of this order and on such representation, the respondents shall consider and take an appropriate decision within six weeks. If the decision results in admission of liability to make the payment, the same shall be released within a period of 4 weeks from that date. 2. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 21, 2011 Pankaj*