' Resoondents HIGH COURT, OF CHHATTISGARH AT B§MSPUR_ 7 WRIT PETlTiON ($) N0: 645i) Ca‘F 2il1§ ‘ titianer S.K.Tiwari Pe versus South Eastern Coameldg Ltd. & Another RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CCNSTiTUTiCN OF lNDlA. {SB : Hon’bie'Mr. Satish K Agnihoiri, J.) fesent :- Shri Gary Mukhopadhyay, Advocate far the petitioner.” 7 ORDER rGRALa 17$ ashok {PaSSed on 12‘“ day of November, 2S1 O) 1. r Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition. However, problem of the petitioner is that his daughter is studying in Class-8‘“ at the present piece of posting and the impugneci transfer order dated 22.102010 wiii hamper the studies of the petitioner’s daughter, which may be 'oohsidered by the respondent authorities, as representation has been ‘riied before the 0MB. 2. in View of that the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with the atorestated direction. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, it is directed that the pending representation of the petitioner, received on 9.1 i .2G10 inthe office of CMD may be considered and decided at the earliest, having regard, to the above stated probiemof the. petitioner, fl/‘L ‘ Sdl— 1 i smish K. Agnihotri} I i Judge i W ?