RSA 114/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Hazarika, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. Hazarika submits that despite various communications issued the appe llant has not come forward for filing application praying for substitution of th e legal heirs of the respondent No.2, who was one of the plaintiffs in the suit. It appears from the order dated 23.05.2011 that the time was granted to file the application for bringing the legal heirs of the respondent No.2 on reco rd. From the said date more than 6(six) months have elapsed. Hence the appeal stands abated as against the respondent No.2. Since in the suit the respondent No.2 was one of the plaintiffs and they jointly claimed the right, title and interest over the land and a joint decree which is not severable has been passed, the entire appeal stands abated and henc e dismissed.