HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR DJVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRIH.L.DATTU, CJ. HQN'BLE SHRI D.R. DESHMUKH, <J. M.C.C. No.133 OF 2007 APPELLANTS 1. 2. ^' 3. Raipur Indian State Bank Adhikari Sangh, Shiksha Samiti Raipyr, Through, tts President Ravi Bilgainya, Aged 59 yrs., Avanti Vihar Cotony, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) Shri Ravj Bilgaiyan, Pr-esident, Raipur Indian State Bank Adhikari Sangh, Shiksha Samiti Raipur, Avanti Vihar Colony, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur(C.G.) Shri K.L. Dey, General Secretary, Raipur Indian Statei Bank Adhiteri Sangh, Shiteha Samiti Rajpur, R/o C-77, Tegore Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Versus Ramesh Gupta S/o Shri D.L. Gupta, aged about 60 years, Member of Raipur Indian State Bank Adhikari Sangh, Shiksha Samiti Raipur, R/o D/5, 3/38, Tegore Nagar Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur(GGj : The Registrar, , .Rtrms- & Saoieties, ehhattisgarh, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) ;" '; ' ADplication for Modifioation of the order dated 18-07-2006 passed bv thisHon'bteCourtinleW.P. No. 1327^006; /- . .^•'w,^. Present: Shri Ramakant Pandey,c6unsel forthe applicants, ORALORDER (Passed on24nApril,2007) \ '•• ! '" : ••:~>. ' The following oral order of Ihe Court was'.passedby H.L.Dattu, C.J. : ~ This M.C.C. is filed by-Raipur Indian State Bank Adhikari Sangh, Shiksha Samiti Raipur & others. They were the respondents in the writ petition filed by one Shri Ramesh Gupta. K |*tt^i \^ (2) Ramesh Gupta was before this Court in a petition filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India inter a?(a alteging that the respondent/society is trying to alienate the property of the society, ahd therefore, appropriate direction requires to be issued. (3) The Court by its order dated 18.07.2006 has disposed of the writ petition by observing that jf for any reason the petitioner is aggrieved by the omissions and commissions said to have been committed by the society/bank, it has to raise appropriafe dispute as is provided under Section 64 of the Chhattisgarh Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The order passed by the Court in no way affects the interest of the applicants herein. Therefore, the request made by the applicant in^this M.C.C. need not be entertained by us. Accordingly, the M.C.C. is rejected. Orclered accordingly. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- DilipRaosahebDeshmukh ^ ..' •^''•'x .^.