IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-9512 of 2010 Date of Decision: 19.05.2010 Dr. Sumeet Sofat ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. R.S. Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India for taking action against respondent No.3. A number of cases have been filed by the present petitioner. Three are pending before this Court for today itself. Some of the prayers appear to be vague and some seem to be over lapping. In order to avoid passing of any contradicting Orders and also to avoid any injustice being caused to the petitioner, the Registry is directed to put up all the cases, filed by the present petitioner, together before one Bench after obtaining necessary Orders from Hon'ble the Chief Justice, in this regard. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 19.05.2010 JUDGE gurpreet IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-9512 of 2010 Date of Decision: 19.05.2010 Dr. Sumeet Sofat ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. R.S. Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** 4. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 5. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 6. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India for taking action against respondent No.3. A number of cases have been filed by the present petitioner. Some of the prayers appear to be vague and some seems to be over lapping. In the interest of justice and also to see that no injustice is caused to the petitioner, the Registry is directed to put up all the cases, filed by the present petitioner, together before one Bench after obtaining necessary Orders from Hon'ble the Chief Justice, in this regard. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 19.05.2010 JUDGE gurpreet