Civil Revision No. 591 of 2010(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 591 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: February 09, 2010 Sukhwinder Singh and another ...... Petitioners Versus Gurdev Kaur and another ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.Deepak Garg, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This petition has been filed against orders dated 21.05.2008 and 21.11.2009 whereby the evidence of the plaintiff-petitioners was closed and the application to recall that order was rejected. Learned counsel states that even though it cannot be argued that the impugned orders are illegal, yet it would be in the interest of justice if the petitioners are allowed one opportunity to lead their entire evidence at their own responsibility without seeking any assistance from the Court. He also states that no prejudice would be caused to the respondents and they can be compensated by way of costs. Learned counsel undertakes that if given one opportunity the petitioners shall lead their entire evidence on the date fixed viz.23.02.2010. Civil Revision No. 591 of 2010(O&M) 2 In my opinion the request made by learned counsel for the petitioners cannot be said to be unreasonable. Consequently this petition is allowed. The impugned orders are set aside and learned trial Court is directed to permit the petitioners to lead their entire evidence at own responsibility without seeking any assistance fr the Court subject to payment of Rs.5000/- as costs to be handed over in the shape of demand draft in favour of the respondents before leading evidence. Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE February 09, 2010 sunita