IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4762 OF 2010 Between : Allepu Praveen .... PETITIONER A N D Allepu Rajani @ Parijatha. …RESPONDENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 4762 OF 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the docket order, dated 19.08.2010, in I.A.No.394 of 2010 in F.C.O.P.No.1 of 2010 on the file of Judge, Family Court, Karimnagar, whereunder and whereby, the application filed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, to grant monthly maintenance of Rs.3000/- and Rs.300/- to meet the court proceedings expenditure on each date of proceeding till disposal of the O.P., was partly allowed granting interim maintenance of Rs.900/- per month to the petitioner from the date when she first appeared before the Court on 26.02.2010 and also directed the petitioner herein to pay T.A. to the petitioner and one person who accompanied her to attend the Court in connection with O.P. on the dates of hearing and Rs.100/- as D.A. and directed to pay the interim maintenance and T.A. and D.A. by 21.09.2010. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that without there being any prayer, the interim maintenance was granted from the date of appearance i.e., 26.02.2010. 4. The petitioner herein is the husband of respondent. The counsel for the petitioner is not disputing about the quantum to be paid as ordered by the trial Court. As seen from the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the prayer is to award Rs.3000/- per month towards monthly maintenance and Rs.300/- to meet Court expenditure on each date of hearing of the proceedings till disposal of the O.P. Therefore, the contention that without there being any prayer, the interim maintenance is granted is unsustainable in view of the fact that the prayer is to grant interim maintenance from each date of proceedings till the disposal of the main O.P. Therefore, the Court below rightly exercised its discretion in passing the order. That order does not suffer any infirmities so as to call for interference by this Court. Hence, the revision is devoid of merit and is liable to be dismissed. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU. J OCTOBER 29, 2010. YVL