IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14878 of 2011 Umesh Prasad, Son of Shri Prasad Sinha @ Prasadi Mahto, resident of village Itaura, Police Station Manpur, District Nalanda, at present Road No.13A, Rajendra Nagar, P.S. Kadamkuan, District Patna. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Minor Irrigation Department, State of Bihar, Patna. 3. Chief Engineer, Dakshin Nalkoop Prabhag, Minor Irrigation Department, Patna. 4. Superintending Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Tube- well Circle, Mithapur, Patna. 5. Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Tube well Division, Munger. 6. The Director, Provident Fund, Government of Bihar. 7. The Accountant General, Patna, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 3. 15.9.2011. Heard Smt. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Santosh Kumar Mishra, learned A.C. to G.P.14, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 6/State of Bihar. The petitioner, who retired on 31.3.2011 as Assistant Engineer from Minor Irrigation Department, has prayed for directing the respondents to pay all his retiral dues. The petitioner has not brought on record any representation demanding justice before the authority concerned and without filing representation, the present writ petition has been filed. 2 The court is of the opinion that petitioner can be granted liberty to file representation before respondent no.3 within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.3 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no.3 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass appropriate order for clearing his retiral dues and issuance of sanction order. The petitioner may also file a representation before respondent no.6/Director, Provident Fund for the claim of his G.P.F. amount within six weeks. The respondent no.6 is required to pass order for payment within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The court expects that respondent no.7/Accountant General shall issue authorization within four weeks from the date of receipt of sanction order from the State authority. With above observation and 3 direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)