IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4343 of 2010 Between: V.Rama Lakshmi and others … Petitioner And Rankireddi Suryanarayana … Respondent This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4343 OF 2010 ORDER: The defendants are in revision against the orders of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Amalapuram, dated 01.05.2010, whereby he allowed the I.A.No.250 of 2008 in O.S.No.335 of 2007, filed by the plaintiff to amend the plaint. Plaintiff, who filed the suit for permanent injunction against the defendants, contends that subsequent to filing of the suit, the defendants erected the Ambedkar Statue in the schedule property. In view of the subsequent changes and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, he filed the above I.A., to amend the plaint by incorporating the relief of mandatory injunction. On contest, the trial court allowed the same. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Usha Balashaheb Swami and others v. Kiran Appaso Swami[1] held that the technicality of law should not be permitted to hamper the Courts in administration of justice between the parties and against the allowing of the amendment, the High Court should not slightly interfere in the revisional jurisdiction. In view of the same, this court does not find any illegality in exercise of jurisdiction by trial court in allowing the I.A. filed for amendment, warranting interference and correction by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J 8th October 2010 lmv [1] 2007(5) ALD 79 (SC)