IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 5TH AUGUST 2011 / 14TH SRAVANA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 584 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.K.JAYASREE,AGED 32 YEARS, W/O.RAJAGOPAL,HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT, SANKARA VILASAM HIGH SCHOOL,PONGALADY,PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI.D.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): 4TH RESPONDENT ----------------------------- THOMAS ABRAHAM,S/O.ABRAHAM,AGED 54 YEARS,DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,(IN FULL ADDITIONAL CHARGE),PATHANAMTHITTA 689 645 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.RANI DIOTHIMA THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.O.C NO.584 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE-1 CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 6.4.2011 IN W.P.(C)No. 37285/2010 OF THIS COURT ANNEXURE-II TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.B6-14115/10 DT.4.6.2011 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE.III TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.75879/A3/2010/G.EDN., DATED 28/08/2011 SENT BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GENERAL EDN. (A) DEPARTMENT TO THE DEO, PATHANAMTHITTA ANNEXURE IV TRUE COPY OF ORDER GO (P). NO.52/11/G.EDN., DTD.26/02/2011 ISSUED BY THE GENERAL EDN. J.DEPT. ANNEXURE V TRUE COPY OF STAFF FIXATION ORDER FOR THE YEARS 2008-09 TO 2010-2011 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXTS: NIL \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Contempt of Court Case No.584/2011-S ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 5th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the petitioner produced before me for perusal a copy of the order passed by the District Educational Officer, Pathanamthitta dated 28/07/2011 by which the appointment of the petitioner as High School Assistant (Social Science) is approved with effect from 02/06/2008 onwards as per the various orders including the Judgment of this Court. The passing of the order is recorded. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a condition is put that the next arising vacancy in the cadre of Upper Primary Schoo1 Assistant will be filled up with a protected teacher. It is submitted that the same cannot affect the petitioner. Obviously, it is a matter between the Department and the Manager and, therefore, the petitioner will not be evidently affected by that condition. 3. Even though the learned counsel for the petitioner prayed for payment of cost, since the orders C.C.C. No.584/2011 -:2:- have been complied with, the prayer is declined. But the consequential benefits on the basis of the approval will be disbursed to the petitioner without further delay and on production of the bills by the Headmistress. The Contempt of Court Case is closed. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms