IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 38 OF 2009 SERTORIO S. FACHO ... Petitioner Versus DR. FERNANDO JORGE COLASO AND ANR., ... Respondents Petitioner in Person. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 3rd August, 2009 P.C. Heard. Petition to be returned to the petitioner to be presented before the Court of Sessions in the light of the Judgment of this Court in the case of Dr. Mohan N. Bhawe V/s. M/s. Travel Force and another (CRMA 52 of 2005) wherein it was observed as follows:- "11. In my view since the applicant has a remedy of revision available under S.397 of the Code, this Court need not exercise its jurisdiction either under S.482 of the Code or under Art. 227 of the Constitution. 12. Again the revisional jurisdiction has been conferred concurrently on two courts namely the Court of Sessions as well as this Court. As held by me in the case of Jeetendra R. Deshprabhu V. Laxmikant Yeshwant Parshekar and others (Criminal Revision Application No.28/04) decided on 23.12.04 after considering several decisions of this Court, it is the choice of the superior court whether a revision petition should be entertained by it or not by allowing a party to by-pass the inferior court. I had also observed that it is unwritten law settled by the propriety, practice and prudence that a party ordinarily should approach the Court of Sessions first, in revisional jurisdiction". N. A. BRITTO, J. oc