IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal I Bail Application No.513 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Rijwan Ansari S/o Mohd. Yusuf Ansari, R/o Forest Compound, Ramnagar, District Nainital ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party Arising out of Case Crime No.42 of 2009, U/s 2/3 of Gangster Act, 1986, PS Tallital, District Nainital Dated: May 17, 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Parikshit Saini, Adv. for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that in the gang chart, two cases have been shown against him as FIR No.41/2009 u/s 147/504/506/427/307 PS Tallital, Distt. Nainital and another being FIR No.243/09 u/s 420/467/471/506/468 IPC, PS Ramnagar, Distt. Nainital. He further submitted in the first case i.e. FIR No.41/09, the applicant has been granted bail by this Court on 5.4.2010 while in the second case i.e. FIR No.243/09, the applicant has been granted bail by the Sessions Judge, Nainital on 1.10.09. Learned Addl. GA also conceded to this point and submitted that only these two cases are shown in the gang chart against the present applicant. After considering all the facts and circumstances, perusing the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record as well as the bail orders dated 5.4.2010 and 1.10.2009 passed by this Court and the court below respectively, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Rizwan Ansari be released on bail on each of their executing personal bonds and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Special Judge, U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Nainital. The bail application is allowed accordingly. 17.05.2010 Rajeev Dang (Dharam Veer, J.)