IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1240 of 2008 OF MOTION NO.1240 of 2008 OF MOTION NO.1240 of 2008 in in in INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.781 OF 2008 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.781 OF 2008 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.781 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax 14 Mumbai . Appellant Vs. Shailesh S.Dalmiya (HUF) .. Respondent Mr.S.M.Shah for Appellant Mr.S.J.Mehta for Respondent CORAM CORAM CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan and : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan and : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan and A.V.Nirgude, A.V.Nirgude, A.V.Nirgude, JJ JJ JJ DATED DATED DATED : 28th April, 2008 : 28th April, 2008 : 28th April, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and respondents. 2. By this appeal, appellant is seeking condonation of 225 days delay in filing the above appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the notice of motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant. Hence, notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (A.V.Nirgude, (A.V.Nirgude, (A.V.Nirgude, J) J) J) (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J) J) J)