.« c. r IN THE HIGH^QURTOFCHHATTISGARH AT BJLASPUR (C.G.) W.P.NO........../20Q6 PETITIONER / SavitriBai W/o Santu Singh Kanwan Aged about- 38 years Sarpanch of Gram Panchayal Jharna, Village- Jhama. Distt- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS F,'~> ^r //^F^ .^T ^ <^ t^ c 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary Panchayat Departn'ient, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) ' ^2. Collector/Additional Collector District Janjgir-Champa(C.G.) ^ 3. Chief Executiye Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bamhnidih, Districf- Janjgir- ChampafC.G.) /?'%/" ..., N< i> ^\<^ yst',, r,'v^.^^ 4. GramPanchaya.t-Jharna, Through :. Secretary, Vilalge- Jharna, Distt- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 5. Shri Narayan Prasad Rathore Up-Sarpanch Gram Panehyat Jharna, Village- Jharna, Distt- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) •^' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226Z227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 sn^rq^ fCT^sn^r Sbli* Hf?(T SblT^i 3^ "iii'MKn'M, ^•rfl+f'is, Rioiyy 3T1^?T<4ach il*iwi sh*<lt*> •••••••••••••••••••>• g^- 200 Rfc^ a.n^Tg^iRRflf^T 04.09.2006 Shri F'rateek Shanna, Shri N.K. Aerawal. DV advance COTIV. Heard on adiaission. Leamed counsel for inipugned order (Annexurel Counsel for fhe petitioner. t A.G. for the State aad CoUector on the Janjeir-Champa^ ia Enquin( resfclution Hi^ datihl 110 09/06/2006 directed for pertamiag to fhe earlier fhe recominendatious about made by ffae Paachayat of the Gram Panchavat with law and ia Dursuauce action for confinnation ete. also submits fhat there is Gram Sabha. He further Additional CoUector is It appears that some CoUector about non-i Pan.chavat Karmi by the enqiury was conducted bv cW Up-Sarpanch aad Secretarvl pertaianie to the appointinetit bv the Additional CoUector. (petitioner hereinl disclosed] -prosecultuig Sarbanch Wlfepft^T WRTt ff fet^ ri^RR ^aif^iTsn^T petitioner subnrits that bv way of P-5), Additional CoUector, District Proceedmg No.l9/A-121./05-06^ on Uoldins the meeting of Gram Sabha of Gram Paachavat, ia which, Iselection of Pandvivat Karmi has been subinission is fhat earlier resolutiou 23/9/2005 was not ia accordance bf the aforesaid rcsolution, no furfher by the Giam Sabha can be done. He necessity of caBins the laeetuie of that the order uasscd bv the stbmits wifho^it jurisdictiou. c'<|;oiaplaint was made to fhe Additional with the matter of appoiatment of aad on thc said coinplamt; the ^Uing fhe Sarpaach (petitfoner hereia), joftheGramPanchavat. The records of Panchavat Karmiwas also caUed It furfher comes that fhe Sarpaach in fhc enquirv that in the mattpr of -r^——</-^— XI-HC-22 j3^.^i5iafi,.ATUy-<i<o,.{sidiy^ ;' F;EIRT'':T^ 3i|i^i ^ach :l;rBI 7ra~' ^.^±J£.3^i{,3:JO^_ K 1«MIsht< I* ^•'•^•—'•••••'-^—^ ~200 f^s an^r^r f^TR?3n^r sbli'»i(rf?cT Sflf 3n^r?RfTW:fl1w 2- l=t>i<ifci41-i ^mvfi if fs^ <Rt(-Al< ^a^TSti^r | sdlected po^t, appouitment of Pcawhayal Panchavat. unaniinouslv i appointment to fhe Isaid meetine of ttie Grain Sabh^. agreeing wifh the selection o) CoUector. after conducting conclusion that by niaioriN Rathore was passed ia the in< Sarpanch have siened thc name was recominendcd foii Additional CoUector passcd iurisdictiort under Sectiou 861 1993 aad directed for caUitig consequence of which, fh.e iDii issued. Sub-secdon li of Sefc Govemnient or tfae writine, direct anv Panchavatl to by or under this Act, or bv beiae inforce or any work as the case mav be, bv it and th|E such Panchavat is, ia the prescribed aufhoritv.inecess^rv If ttie Additional performine the dutvi of Parl< procedure of appointinent olf Pamu', she was not heard and the one Tarachaud I Rathore fbr therefore, she is not caUme tfae She submitted that she is not f the said candidate. The Additional the entire enquuv, came to thc of votes, the name df Tarachand :etine and all the Panchas, except the tiroceedines of the nieetuig and his appointment. Holdina'aU fhis, the the impuened order by exercisine lofthe C.G. Pcawhavat Rw Adhinivant. itie fhe mectiue of Gram Sabha. ia iDiBuencd notice fAnnexure P-6) was prescriltied ;tion 86 provides that the State authoritv may, by an order ui perfonn aay duty unposed upon it, or under any othcr law!fi>r fhe tunc not being perfi3rmed or executed, as s performance or executipn thereofbv )pmion of the State GQvenunent or in public interest. i has passed aa order for ;havat in relation to cbinpletion of Panchavat Karrm, it cannot be said C<tUector XI-HC-22 \ •~7~T-~!"f "iTW~y"'i • ^•hi ^'^ ^s ^ ^° SJ ^P ^^ _—3a-riij-atei^,-adL'yii&ri-<teij*<^<- 7T57T^T7 TSTS'[ 'F ir;?!TH:l F|13:T-"TT;-Tn:i* |y>ij^ F^-.ii-i (^- sn^rw R^Rsn^r sh*li<t> Hf?(T StitlW r" V-' 3m^5T V[SRK^p Twws wer l^jf-JM^/0^ '(||tTCTTtht1T^- 3n^T gRiiw fff?a' mcrit in tbe petitibner. Tbe that either the order inassed lurisdiction or the same has the time beina inforce. There is no couasel for the fails aml is suminarUv disniiss It is made clear fhat v Court has not expressed anv the appointiaent of oroposed Rathore nor this Court has resolution offhe other partv shall be stage ia accordance Certified copv as 1 w'RTW 1 ," - __.•- 1 i^s'i^ fyr-pl 1 'B31T? IP|TI?E; -ZDO' Rl'b«A 3 Uv the Additional Collector is without bleen passed in violation of aiiv law for Gram Panchtvat 6se to <t the oerrul with »hi<ifa'n-i*ii>icii'^''tec^'<'rsi+<i< ^sri^tTsn^r 1 areuincnts advan.ce^ by learaed ! petition has no merit. Thc sanie feed without notice to theiother sidc. frhile disposmg of ttiis oetition, this bpiaion regarduie the proceediags of \Panchawxt Kcurni samely Taractiand fcominented upon the ihcrits of the and fhe petitioner as weU as anv bballenge atl this at fhe, appropriate rtrovisionsoflaw. ! •s. Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge i00.,ii-rt(ifl^^^