IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 16552 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: August 16, 2010. Satish ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Rahul Deswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.M.Anand, Addl.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.64 dated 26.02.2010, under Sections 365/419/511/506 IPC, Police Station Julana, District Jind. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 28.05.2010 passed the following order:- “This petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has been filed by the petitioner, for the grant of anticipatory bail, in case FIR No.64 dated 26.02.2010 under CRM No.M-16552 of 2010 Sections 365/419/511/506 IPC, Police Station Julana, District Jind. The Counsel for the petitioner, has submitted that as per the allegations, the petitioner alongwith co-accused kidnapped Ravinder Kumar, complainant, with a view to confine him. He has further submitted that no specific role has been attributed to the petitioner in the alleged commission of crime. Notice of motion for 4.6.2010. In the meanwhile, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim anticipatory bail, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, on his furnishing the bail bonds, in the adequate sum, subject to the compliance of the conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has already joined the investigation pursuant to said order dated 28.05.2010. It has also been stated by learned counsel for the State that petitioner has joined the investigation and that he is no more required for any custodial interrogation. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of Satish, is accepted and order dated 28.05.2010 granting interim bail in favour of the petitioner is, hereby, made absolute subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) 2 CRM No.M-16552 of 2010 August 16, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 3