1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 294 of 2009 MUNICIPAL BOARD, SURATGARH V/S JEET RAM & ORS. Mr. PR MEHTA, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 6.5.2009 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI GOVIND MATHUR,J. ORDER ----- This appeal has been filed against some interlocutory order dt. 12.10.2006 passed in Writ Petition No. 6825/2003. This order happened to be passed on some application filed by present respondents no. 2 and 3 before the learned Single Judge. From perusal of the order sheets and documents available in the file of Single Bench it transpires, that for non compliance of this order some contempt petition was filed, being contempt petition no. 184/2007, and on 23.10.2007 it was informed, that the order has been complied with. Therefore, the contempt petition was dismissed as having become infructuous. In that view of the matter, this appeal remains only academic. Since the basic question in the writ petition is about entitlement of the present respondent 2 no.1, writ petitioner, to get the relief as prayed in the writ petition, and the same has not been adjudicated upon, and is required to be gone into, as in the writ petition show cause notices have been issued vide order dt. 14.1.2004, and thereafter the writ petition was admitted on 16.5.2007. In that view of the matter this appeal is simply disposed of, in view of the impugned order having been complied with. Obviously the writ petition would be decided by the learned Single Judge on merits. The private respondents no. 2 and 3 had come before the learned Single Judge by filing application, whereupon the impugned order has been passed, and they are already impleaded as party respondent. It is clarified, that since the impugned order is interlocutory one, it will be subject to ultimate outcome of the writ petition. The appeal is accordingly disposed of as above. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /Sushil/