IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1193 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- KAILASHBHAI AMRATLAL KAPADIA SINCE DECD.THRO HEIRS & L.R. Versus SUVARNABEN ACHARATLAL PARIKH -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Civil Revision Application No. 1193 of 1992 MR SURESH M SHAH for Petitioner No. 1 MR MEHUL S SHAH for Petitioner No. 1-1/5 MR KC SHAH for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR Date of decision: 10/03/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.S.M.Shah, learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that he has received instruction from his client that the parties have settled the dispute and nothing further is required to be done in this Civil Revision Application. Therefore, he wants to withdraw this Civil Revision Application. 2) Permission to withdraw this Civil Revision Application is granted. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Application is disposed of as having been withdrawn. Interim relief stands vacated. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. (P.B.Majmudar,J.) /malek