( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7230 OF 2010 Babasaheb s/o. Waman Narhe .. Petitioner Versus The Returning Officer/Circle Officer, .. Respondent Takli Dhokeshwar, Tal. Parner, Dist. Ahmednagar. Mr. S.S. Thombre h/f. Mr. S.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.M. Nerlikar h/f. Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 16.08.2010 P.C. :- 1. Heard learned Counsel. The petitioner’s nomination form was rejected by the Returning Officer for the reason that he did not submit any documents to prove that the caste claim was referred to the Scrutiny Committee. The caste certificate was not produced along with nomination form. Considering tenor of Section 10-1A of the Bombay Village Panchayat’s Act, 1958, the omission seems to have been ( 2 ) reconsidered. There is no substance in the petition. The petitioner is, however, at liberty to file regular Election Petition, after the elections are over. The petition is disposed of. [V.R. KINGAONKAR,J.] snk/2010/AUG10/wp7230.10