IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51647 of 2008 1. RAMASHRAY YADAV S/O LATE NABI YADAV 2. NANDLAL YADAV S/O BINO YADAV 3. SHIV JATAN YADAV @ SHIV JATAN PRASAD YADAV S/O SHRI YADAV 4. JANARDAN YADAV S/O SARYUG YADAV 5. SANTOSH YADAV @ SANTOSH NIRALA S/O RAMASHRAY YADAV 6. ANIL YADAV S/O JANARDAN YADAV ( ALL ARE R/O VILL- BHAWANIPUR, P.S. SURAJGARHA, DIST. LAKHISARAI. ----- PETITIONERS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ---- OPP. PARTY. ----------- 03. 17.04.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Sections 147, 341, 323, 504, 379, 384, 353 and 427 of the Penal Code. As per allegation in the F.I.R., petitioners forming a group arrived at the site of construction of school building and demanded ‘rangdari’ tax. Further allegation is that some of them assaulted the informant who is the Chairman of the school ‘Shiksha’ Samiti. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in fact, the petitioners have objected to the use of sub-standard material in the construction of the school building. It has further been submitted that the police submitted final form but the court below having regard to the materials on record has taken 2 cognizance against the petitioners. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the witnesses in the case diary have supported the allegation. Having regard to these facts, this court is not persuaded that a case for grant of anticipatory bail has been made out. Accordingly, the application seeking anticipatory bail stands rejected. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)