IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13435 of 2009 BIPIN KUMAR SAH @ BIPIN SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.15835 of 2009 1. MEENA KUER @ MOST.MEENA DEVI @ MOSTT BHIMA DEVI 2. KALAWATI JUER @ MOST KALAWTI DEVI 3. RAM CHANDRA SAH 4. DHARICHHAN SAH ------ Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 24.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Both the applications for anticipatory bail arise out of same P.S.case i.e. Chautarwa (Bhairoganj) P.S.Case No.88 of 2007, have been heard together. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that pressurizing tactics has been adopted by the petitioners for having more share in the property of maternal side. Petitioners are relatives of the informant. More over there was no chance to take meal from the litigating party even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest which never can be justified. I agree with the submission. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or - 2 - surrender within one month from today in Chautarwa (Bhairoganj) P.S.Case No.88 of 2007, the above named five petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha (W.Champaran), subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI