-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2127 OF 2005 Dastagir @ Dastu Karamat Khan .. Petitioner v/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors. .. Respondents Mr.Sandesh More for Mr.Naveen Chomal for the petitioner. Mr.Y.S.Shinde, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 25th October, 2005. P.C. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has been released on furlough. However, his surety is not accepted by the authorities concerned. It is pointed out to us that the enquiry made by the respondents reveals that surety is not residing at Ghatkopar. 2. In the circumstances, the petitioner is directed to furnish fresh surety. After such surety is furnished by the petitioner, the respondents should take expeditious steps for verifying the same. 3. Petition is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.RANJANA (SMT.RANJANA (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, DESAI, DESAI, J.) J.) J.) (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)