HON’BLE SRI G.S.SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE WRIT PETITION No.14976 of 2002 Between: Bollineni Veeranjaneyulu and another. …Petitioners And The State of A.P., through Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. …Respondents. :: O R D E R :: Counsel for the petitioners : Sri P. Lakshmikanth Reddy for Sri B. Vijaysen Reddy Counsel for the respondents : None. 8th August, 2007 In this petition, the petitioners have made the following substantive prayers: “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or writs, order or direction declaring the action of the respondent No.3 in summoning us to police station and interfering with our personal liberty in connection with RC.Nos.2908 dt.26-7-2002 and RC.No.8912 dt.26-7-2002 pending on the file of the 3rd respondent as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the official respondents not to interfere with our personal liberty otherwise than by due process of law and be pleased to pass such other order/s as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. b) Interim direction to respondents No.2 to 5 not to interfere with our personal liberty and not to summon us to the police station in connection with RC.No.2908 dt.26-7-2002 and RC.No.8912 dt.26-7-2002 otherwise than by due process of law, pending disposal of the writ petition and be pleased to pass such other order/s as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” Learned counsel for the petitioners says that the writ petition has become infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. Ordered accordingly. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition as infructuous, the interim order is vacated and WPMP.No.18752 of 2002 is dismissed. G.S. SINGHVI, C.J. 8th August, 2007. ARS