lN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WP. (S) No. §0§\ [201 1 PETITIONER /:“ Phagulal Dewangan, S/o. Shyamlal Dewangan, aged about 56 years, working as Revenue Inspector Land Record, Revenue Circle, cWiV/ 3 i Kasdoi, Distt. Raipur (cc) 7V v E R s U S RESPONDENTS /(1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretaly, Revenue 8r, Disaster Management Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / (2) Director, Revenue Department, Raipur (C.G.) / (3) Commissioner, Office of Commissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur (C.G.) ,..... , (4) Collector, Land Record, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA cgw @‘3 HIGH C01 IRT OF CHHATFISGARH AT BII ,ASPI IR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 5051 of 2011 Phagulal Dewangan. VER SI IS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICI ,F, 226 OF THE CONSTITI JTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihntri, J. Present: Shri Vinnd Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Moorlhy, Deputy Advocate General for Ihe State/respondents. Shri S.P. Navratna, Dy. Commissioner (R), Bilaspur, is present. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 06 day of September, 201 1) 1. At the very outset, Shri Moorthy, learned counsel appealing for the State/respondents, on instmctions: submits that. the order dated 18.08.2011 (Annexure P/ 1) impugned herein, has not been passed by a competent authority in accordance with Rule 20, Part II, of the Madhya Pradesh/Chhattisgarh Land Record Manual, thus, the same is unsustainable in law and shall not be given effect. to. In View of the above submission made by learned State counsel, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. . Accordingly, the impugled order dated 18.08.2011 (Annexure P/l) is quashed. However, liberty is reserved to the State/respondents to pass appropriate order, if so advised, in accordance with law, in administrative exigency and in public interest.