<-... HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETiTSON (S} No. 5756 of 2007 PETrTIONERS RESPQNDENTS 1. Hari Ram Patels/o Girdhari Patsi, aged about 24 years, R/o viilage Kichri, Post Ben^chi, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (CG) Presently posted and working as Shiteha Karml Grade iii in Primary Schooi Semikot, ilock Baramkeia, District Raigarh (CG) Ku. Seema Patel D/o Pyarelal Patel, aged about 19 years, C/o Pyarela! PateS Kra. Ga. Kendra, Saramkela Via Baramkeia, Tehsl! Sarangarh, District Raigarh (CG) Presentiy posted and working as Shiteha Karmi Grade iii in Primary School Lendra, Biock 3. Devei)dra Kumar Singh s/o Badriprasad Singh, aged about 25 years, C/o Shri U.K.Singh, R/o viilage & Post Bonda, Via Saria, Tehsii Saran^rh, District Raigarh (CG) Presentiy posted and working as Shlteha Karmi Grade 111 in PrimarySchoo! Panchdhara, ilock Baramkeia, District Ralgarh (CG) State bf Chhattlsgarh, Through the Sscrstary, Panchayat & Rural Development, D.K.S. Buiiding, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Coilector, Raigarh, Dtetrict Raigarh(CG) Executive Officer, Japad Panchayat Baramkela, District Raigarti (CG) 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Saramkeia, District Raigarh (CG) WBITPETIIION UNDER ARTiCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDiA r! shri B.D.Guru.Advocateforthe petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/rgspondsnts ihri A.S.Kachhwaha,Advocate for the respondent i. (Passed on 03rd day of Mareh, 2009) With the consent ot learned counse! appearing forthe parties, the matteris heard flnally. . 2. Learned counse! appearing for the State/respondents fairiy submit that the issue involved in this case asto whether the petjtioners, who are Shiksha Karmiss, have been affordec! an opportunity of hearing before termlnation from their post, came into consideration before this Court in the matter of Ku. Punam and ofters v. ChhaWsgarh Others1. Shri Kachhwaha further submits that since no notices were given before termination, the authorities shaiitake approprlate steps in terms of the Judgment and order passed in Ku. Punsm fsupra), before passing any order. 3. In visw of foregoing, accordlng to learned counset appearing for the 4. Havlng regard to the facts situation of the case and judgment in the matter of Ku. Punam fsupra}, the impugned ination order dated 13.08.2007 (Annexure P/i) is quashed. However, liberty is reserved to the State/respondents to take appropriate steps in accordance with !aw and judgnent and order passed in Ku. Punam. (supra). No order asto costs. 5. Gonsequently, pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Aim!: Z008 (2) CGLJ 366