IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT CONTEMPT CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 138 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 138 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 138 OF 2004 Shri Tanaji Anna Londhe ... Petitioner V/s. Narayan Bandu Londhe & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Umesh R. Mankapure for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Godbole for respondent No. 1 to 3. Mr. D.A. Patil, Govt. Pleader for Respondent No. 14 CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED DATED DATED : 26th June, 2006 : 26th June, 2006 : 26th June, 2006 P.C. . The limited grievance required to be considered in this contempt petition is whether the act of the respondent-contemnor in effecting change in the 7/12 extract so as to include the names of other family members as holder along with petitioner can be said to be in breach of the order of status-quo passed by this Court on 9th March, 2000 in Civil Application No. 7142 of 1999. 2. In my opinion, it will not be necessary to precipitate the matter any further. This is so because, the entry which was made at the instance of respondent-contemnor has been set-aside by the Divisional Authority. Cause for initiating contempt action is not in existence. ( 2 ) 3. In the circumstances, this Contempt Petition is disposed of. It will be open to the petitioner to take recourse of any other remedy as may be available in law against respondents. [A.M. [A.M. [A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.] KHANWILKAR,J.] KHANWILKAR,J.]