IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1023 of 2008(M/S) Shiv Shankar Singh …… Petitioner Versus Jai Pal Singh and another ……. Respondents ….…… Mr. A.Vashistha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Alok Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advovate for the respondents. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C.J. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner against two orders, dated 10.06.2008 and 11.06.2008 passed by the learned District Judge, Dehradun. 2. Vide order dated 10.06.2008, the learned District Judge, Dehradun in an un-numbered Appeal decided to hold Spot Inspection that day itself at 4 p.m. Annexure No. 18 on the file of this petition (page No. 170-171) is the copy of the Inspection Report dated 10.06.2008 of the learned District Judge. On 11.06.2008, the learned District Judge made certain observations arising out of the aforesaid Inspection Report and posted the appeal and the connected Civil Revision Petition for 04.07.2008. 3. Aggrieved, the petitioner has approached this Court against the aforesaid orders. 4. In view of the fact that learned District Judge went to the spot, inspected the same and made some pertinent observations in his Inspection Report about the possession of the parts of the property, I think the appeal should be heard by some other Court. 5. The parties agree with my suggestion and submit that the appeal can be transferred for hearing to the District Judge, Haridwar along with the connected revision petition. 6. This petition is disposed of finally without expressing any view or comment about the aforesaid orders dated 10.06.2008 and 11.06.2008 and the Inspection Report dated 10.06.2008. 7. The appeal and the connected revision petition are hereby transferred from the file of learned District Judge, Dehradun to the Court of learned District Judge, Haridwar. 8. This order shall be intimated to both the Courts. The learned District Judge, Dehradun is directed to transmit the record to the learned District Judge, Haridwar, where the parties, through their learned counsel, are directed to appear on 14.07.2008. 9. The learned District Judge, Haridwar is directed to hear and dispose of the appeal very very expeditiously. 10. While hearing and disposing of the appeal, the learned District Judge, Haridwar shall not either take into consideration the Inspection Report dated 10.06.2008 of the learned District Judge, Dehradun nor shall he in any manner be influenced by the same. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 01.07.2008 A