•<J v tlNClt IENCH <^-F 1^-25^7 ,. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.(!S.) NO. 22^^ /2010 PETITIONER: Smt. Puniya Bai Kouslesh aged about 53 years, W/o Shri Sunder Singh working as Head Mistress at Governnient Middle School Seoni, Block Marwahi, District Bilaspiir (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^f, /^ ^ ^/^/ ^y ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) , 2. The Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department Raipur (C.G.) A'^z- ^w/ ^" <^, ^ - ^ 3. The Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Composite Building Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) .4. The District Education Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ^ 5. The Block Education Officer Marwahi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITIONT UNDER ARTICLE 226 _QF...TBK CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE_OFWRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY_QR_ANY OTHER WRIT OIF LIKE NATURE ETC. i^ Petitloners Respondent CGURT OF CHHA'TTISGARH AT BSLASPUR WRrT_PETiTiQN_ISlNO_2245_ofl010 Smt Punlya Bal Kousiesh Versus State of Chhattlsgarh & others. WRIT PETITiON UNDER ART'ICLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF iNDSA (SB : Hon'ble IVir. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.l .PI§s®£lll-Shri K.S. Pawar, Advocate for the petitloner. Shri IVIP.S. Bhatia, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the State/respondents, ORDERfORAy (Passed ort 6th day of May,2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on jnstructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage, and prays-for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to nnake a representation in the iight ofthe circuiar dated 27.12,2008 (Annexure P/2). Shri Bhatla, learned Deputy Government Advocate for the State/respondents subrnits that Jf a representation is made, the sa.me shail be considered aod dedded wlthio a period of three vveeks from the date of recelpt ofthe.representa.tion, in the Sight ofthe above stated cirGular, as wel! as the order dated 20.10.2009 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 6128/2007 (Jagannath Ram v. The of ChhaWsgarh & Others) and other connected matters. in vlew of the foregoing, the petition 3s dismissed as withdrawn with the above-stated iiberty, It is expected that the concerned aythoriti^ wouid consider and decide the representation, if any, as above, within a period of three vveeks from the date of receipt of the represeotation aioogvvith a copy of this ofder. Arun Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge