Civil Revision No. 4910 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 4910 of 2011 Date of Decision: 24.8.2011 Dharamveer Singh and Others …Petitioners Versus Balvinder Singh and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. I.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate for the caveators. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The present revision petition has been preferred by plaintiffs to the suit being aggrieved against the decisions of both the Courts below, whereby ad interim injunction was refused to them. The plaintiffs/petitioners had filed a suit seeking permanent injunction that the defendants be restrained from excavating/carving out any watercourse through the passage/path comprised in khasra No. 410 situated in village Jhorar Nali, Tehsil and District Sirsa. A further prayer was made that the defendants be restrained not to cause any obstruction in the path/passage used by the plaintiffs. The trial Court, while deciding an application for ad interim injunction, has relied upon the report of Local Commissioner dated Civil Revision No. 4910 of 2011 2 1.7.2011, which revealed that adjacent to the passage, there existed a pucca watercourse. Both the Courts below have accepted contentions of the defendants that a meeting of Gram Panchayat of villages Jhorarnali, Alanoor, Dhani Khoba, Bhamboor and Nanakpur was convened and it was mutually decided that an outlet be constructed in Ghaggar river for irrigation of land of villages Bhamboor, Alanoor and Jhorar Nali and as a result of compromise, an outlet was constructed from the said river in the year 1989. A certified copy of the document dated 11.9.1989, was placed on the Court record, as a compromise, to show that after the consent of the Government was accorded, a kuchha watercourse was constructed in khasra No. 410/2. The above said circumstances were taken into consideration by the Courts below to deny the relief of ad interim injunction. In view of the findings, recorded by both the Courts below, which suffer from no infirmity, no interference is warranted in the present revision petition and hence, the same is hereby dismissed, in limine. Anything said herein shall have no effect on merits of the case at the time of final adjudication of the suit. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge August 24, 2011 “DK”