1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 74 OF 2010 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 118 OF 2010 Shri Manek Laxmidas Shah ... Applicant v/s Shri Rajaram Mahadev Vichare ... Respondent Mr.Rajesh More for the applicant. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 27TH JANUARY, 2010 P.C.: 1. The appeal has been preferred against an order passed by the Trial Court which has been in force from 26.10.2009 rejecting the application at Exh.5. It is contended on behalf of the appellant that the Trial Court has erred in observing that prima facie the signatures on the agreement and on the written statement do not tally. It is submitted that this finding could have been arrived at only if expert evidence was led with respect to the handwriting. It is also submitted that the learned Judge has wrongly observed that the 2 appellant could not have paid Rs.6 lacs which was part of the consideration, in cash. All these are, in my opinion, prima facie findings and, therefore, the learned Judge has not committed an error in refusing interim relief to the appellant. 2. Appeal from order dismissed along with the civil application. ..... 3