1 CRWP NO.831/2010 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 9. WP/831/2010 DILIP MOHAN CHAVAN AND ORS [Criminal] V/S THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR ------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. Vivek V.Ingale, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. G.R.Ingole, APP for State. Mr. S.S.Patankar, Adv., for R.2. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:June 17th, 2011 1. Heard. Issuance of process in SCC No.644/2008, by order dated 8th Sept.,2009, is questioned in terms of Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking quashment. 2. The defense is, at the material time, the accused/applicants were not either residing with the family of the complainant or they were not available on 15th Oct.,2003, when she was allegedly harassed or tortured. For that purpose, certificate in respect of Manik, one of the applicant, who worked as a driver, to be in service is tendered. Certificates in respect of Savitrabai 2 CRWP NO.831/2010 and Shital Shinde, other applicants, are also tendered. 3. These aspects, with the respective applicants, that they were not available on the date of incident i.e. 15th Oct.,2003, would not be available to be coined for quashment as these are the defences (plea of alibi) which are to be raised at appropriate place. I do not see any error in issuance of the process as the learned Judge has assessed the material placed before him and then passed the order. Revisional Court also considered all the aspects and, consequently dismissed the revision by order dt.13.7.2010. Petition lacks merit, dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/831-10crwp