1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Government Appeal No. 54 of 2011 State of Uttarakhand …..…Applicant/appellant Versus Ram Kishore Saklani S/o Late G.D. Saklani The then Station Officer Kaladhungi District Nainital ……….Respondent Mr. S.S. Adkhikari, A.G.A., present for the State. Ms. Neelima Mishra, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate, present for the respondent. Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. This is delay condonation application no. 1114 of 2011, for condonation of delay in filing the appeal against the judgment and order dated 15.06.2011, passed by Sessions Judge, Nainital, in Sessions Trial No. 191 of 2010. 2. Perused the affidavit filed with the application. 3. Delay condonation application is allowed. Delay is condoned. 2 4. Heard on leave to appeal, and perused the impugned judgment and order dated 15.06.2011, passed by the Sessions Judge, Nainital, in Sessions Trial No. 191 of 2010, whereby said court has acquitted the respondent Ram Kishore Saklani from the charge of offences punishable under section 201, 218, 221 IPC, Police Station Kaladhungi. 5. The perusal of the impugned order shows that neither complainant P.W. 1 Sher Singh has supported the prosecution Story, nor P.W.2 Constable Dan Giri, nor P.W.3 Constable Satyendra Prasad Gangola, and others. Having gone through the impugned order, this Court finds that there was not sufficient evidence to hold the respondent Ram Kishore Saklani guilty of charge of offences punishable under section 201, 221, 218 IPC. 6. In the above circumstances, leave to appeal application no. 107 of 2011, is rejected. Leave is refused. Appeal stands dismissed summarily. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Parul 20.09.2011