^•1. ^"" .^' ^ ^Q ^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE MATTER OF W.P. No.2S.3J./2004 PETITIONER: '^ ?''i ^ RESPONDENTS: ./^\ .^ ^ l^ysv. / . .• A..' M/S ASHISH SINGH THAKUR, THROUGH PROPRIETOR .SHKI ASHISH SINGH SON O.F SHRI BALRAM SINGH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDENT OF BALRAM TALKIES PARISHAR, NEHRU NAGAR, BILASPUR. VERSUS THE EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, MINISTRY OF LABOUR, GOVT. OF INDIA) THROUGH THP; REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, REGIONAL OFFICE, RAIPUR (C.G.) THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER & QUAS1 JUDICIAL AUTHORITY UNDER S.ECTION 7-A OF EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUNDS & MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT 1952, SHRI BIBHISHAN PADHAN, REGIONAL OFFICF^, RAIPUR [C.G.] WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226/227 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT/ORDER OR DIRECTION AS DEEMED FIT //J\/X '/^Y •/^w XI-HC-22 -s^t •^TRI^T. ^Tn'y4i<°, rci<r"'"i< sn^r^T F<tii<=h 'sn^r $h^icr> ^f^a t- 3ff^?T XR^ . ^:.^.2^3.!. W^C'11 5h*<l<^ "W[, 200 vf 'fN^sr" STf^T ^^T^T ^f^a 20.09.2004 On a xaention being xaade, I Ku,Suxuta Jaia, counael f^ Applicatioxi for urgeiit heaipiig Heard. the siiatter is taken up- fhe petitionex^s). is aBow^ed. Fiutid bej|ag efe It K stated that fhe petitio^ undcr Exxiployccs Providcnt Act 1952, Leamed counsel for Employees Provident Fund Ac4 labourcrs/employees are not are ia great difiBczilly oxxd fhey fiirttier submits tiiat for fhe pre^ an opportunity of filmg fhe| Respondent no,2/the compete|o considered on ite own xaerits ia ab Havmg considered aad the merits ofthe case^ in the wlll be seived i£a du^ctlou is detoifed rRpnksentetk]in raisingl no.2/the competent authority aSdp this order, wifhia 10 days, aiid thc coinpcticnt eiufhoirily of thc by a x^asoned order on its own ear^ as possible prsferably wifhi^i of tfaie rcprcsentation, it is mad^ remains, fhe parties including ft^ available iinder the law, Wifh fhe oforeeaid disposed of Consequentfy application dlsposed ot C.C. aj& per niles. w|thout op2|aion cbNid^'1 ^i^af'^fi^t ^^K '^3lf^W3^?T icr is a contractor who is eovered ^nd MisccManeous Prov&iona |the i^titioner subniitt^ that fhe |:ount has been seiaed and the paict theu- dues, as sudti they at fhe verge of storvatioa, She ^eQt the petitioners m^ be gweii detaOed representation before petejat aufhorily, whfch shall toe abcordance wifli law, exprcssing any opmion on ofthte Coiirt, ends ofjustice |iveii to Uie petitloHera to make a grievmices hefore respondent r alo^ig wifh a copy offhe petitioa aad such rqprcseiitatioa bemg filed, r^opoxidcnts »halldccidc tibc gauaic bierits m accordaace with law as 4 weeks j&oia the date ofrK^ipt ciear that if axxy grievaace stiU |e petitioner may avail fhe rcmedy ob^rvatione^ thi» petition Btoiide for inteTixs. relfef also steinds Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [Tft^ ^Psi^t