1 13caa-517.11 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.517 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.699 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri R.R. Tiwari for the Applicant. Shri A.R. Patil, AGP for Respondent No.1. Shri Ashutosh Shukla i/by Shri M.U. Pandey for Respondent No.2 -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 30TH MARCH, 2011 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicant and learned counsel appearing for the 2nd Respondent. Learned counsel appearing for the 2nd Respondent states that the statements made in Paragraph 2 of the application are totally incorrect. 2. A case for restoration is made out only on the ground that the Advocate for the Applicant was absent when the appeal was called out for admission. Hence, without accepting the allegations made in the 2 13caa-517.11 application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 3. Next date of the Appeal from Order will be as per the CMIS. (A.S.OKA, J)