a..B;.uilE SsMS.i ^s=<.i>^i:te>St-! i.s'^STi.i-^'^y L IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BDLASPUR WRIT PETITION(S) No. ^62^/2006 PETITIONER /'Smt. Rinku Chakravarti D/o. Sujit Chakravard, aged about 43 years, ^y-y ^^.-•••" »'''6^'"' Occupation Government Teacher ^ >•'' ./••' ^•••"'"r^ ...-••' (Upper Division Teacher) at Govt. ^^ ..-•"' Middle School, Junnapani, BIock Dondi Lohara, District Durg (C.G.). o^!?-'1"^' ^•^-•" RESPONDENTS o^ ^ ^.^' .^>. ^ \>G^ ^^.^ ^^_^^ VERSVS :1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, DKS Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) :2) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.) :3) Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare, Durg District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETIION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF TODIA XI-HC-78 3:5?'<<l<ll<14|,t9Tn^'IS, IqdK-fy t<,.p.C^<ND^%2^/OG 6' *TW(^1 SSW») ^ 200 3n^?T4a«)(l?<I^°'S.tT) sn^T^rR-fi* ?i%fT 3n^r ^TN) ^ttTwafN'sn^r 11.12.2006 Si Shri Ajay Dwivedi, learned F] Heard. By this petition under Articl India, the petitioner seeks a direcl increments and seniority on the| appointment in the tight ofthe dec| Administrative Tribunat, Jabalpl 1452/1998 (Harish Chandra Singtl others)dated 31.1.2000 2. Learned eounsel appearingl <t>i<<F<'i<11-< HiidTffteAiRitAK ^sri^T^n^r mt. Hameeda Siddiqui, tea|ried eounsel for the petffioner. .L. fbr ttie State/respondents. |es 226/227 of the ConstituUon of tion to the respondents to pay the basis of the date <rf her iniUal sion rendered by the learned State jr in Onginal AppticaCon No. and others Vs. State of M.P. and fbr the petitioner placed on record Chhattisgarh and others) and o copy of the order dated 9-11-2Q06 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No. 6123/2006 ( Suren|dra Kumar and another Vs. State of Ider dated 6-4-S in W.P. No. 1^0/2003 (ChhatUsgarh Shikchaf; Sangh -v- State of Chhattisgarh and others) and submits that tt^e petitiorier is similarly situated, therefore, ttie similar order may be|passed. 3. The case of the petitione|r is that she was appointed as Assistant Teacher in the Schooi Qducation Department on pr<Aation for a period of two yeare with the fjxed salary. However, tater on, after comptetion oftwo years' probaiionl the petitioner was regularized but, she was not given e regular pa^ scale from the date of her initial appointment. Other similariy sitijated teachers moved ttie State Administrative Tribunal, Jabatput for regular pay-scate, wherein P.T.O. XI-HC-78 sn^rwR-fi* (WTSn^Tstifl'h +11+1MI aitlT^l 3^ •<ii*iici<<, ®Tn*f'is,Ri<iiMy _,_lo. P.CS^.^'?- ^^6(a W[ 200 @ Sll^l tia«n('i'll^'5!^) B^ITWdficT 311^1 <»ii<<[tf41TiTnT^fsT ^'te^f <f^f-is-^i< ^siRlirsn^T learned Tribunal vide order dateiB 31.1.2000 allowed the same.The petitioner made several represen|aiions to accord the same treatonent as she was also similarly situatedt but, the respondents have not paid any heed. Thus, this petition. | 4. Leamed counsei for the FfeUtfoner submits that the petitioner may be aiiowed to make a repre? similar treatment to the petitioner counsel for the respondents/State ientab'on to respondent No.1 to gh/e and same pay-scale wWch has been sanctioned to other similarly situafed teacherson account offte order of the State Administrative Tribuny dated 31.1.20X), to which learned has no objection. 5. Having heard leamed courjsel for the parties and having regard to the facts andclrcumstances offhe case, in the opinion ofthis Court, ttie limited prayer made by learn^d counsel tor the petitioner appears to be reasonable. Therefore, tti|e petitioner is allowed to mafee a representation within a period of <wo weeks from today to respondent No.1, raising all her grievances decide the said representation in | of 30 days from the date of r^ considering afl the pointe raisecl 6. The writ petition is accord direction. No order as to costs. 7. Certified copy as per rules. and, in tum, respondent No.1 shall an objecUve manner within a period ceipt of such representation, after by the pefitioner and taking into account the order dated 31.1.2p00 passed by the learned State Administrative Tribunal in Original|Application No. 1452/1998. ngly disposed of with the aforesaid Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.