WP 7134/11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7134/2011 Savitra Shivaji Ade V/s The State & others. _______________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | Shri S.V. Jadhav, Advocate for petitioner. Shri P.P. More, AGP for respondent no.1. Shri S.S. Manale, Advocate for respondent nos.2 & 5. Shri Milind Patil, Advocate for respondent no.4. Respondent nos.3 and 6 to 8 served. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. Date: 21.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. It is the basic contention of the petitioner that the respondent no.4 is not the resident of Somnathpur. This contention is disputed by the learned counsel for the Zilla Parishad as well as the respondent no.4. The learned counsel for the Zilla Parishad relies on the address proof issued to the respondent no.4. WP 7134/11 2 Apart from that, even in the memo of the petition, the address, which is given by the petitioner of the respondent no.4, is that of Somnathpur itself. In that view of the matter, the contention is without substance. The petition is, therefore, rejected. (M.T. Joshi, J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.) Dt/- 21.11.2011 ndk/c2111114