^'^n^. 8Wysl t- ^^..?l"ifry f' ..t?^S'^ ^F f^, IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.p. is) NO. 5~ 9 4 / of 2009 i? PETITIONER ,,^ ^^ ,^.'-<^' ^•4'^ 'A^Ky •f'€?l .4^•f^'t fi-' y" GULAL PATRE, S/o Late Shri Santram Patre, Aged about 57 years, Assistant Grade 3RD' [Line], In the office of the Assistant Engineer, 220 Kilo Volt [220 K/V] Su-Station Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Transmission [PARESHAN] Company Limited Bhatapara, Dist. Raipur [C.G.] Versus RESPONDENTS : 1. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Holding ^ ^ ^i' ^^ 0\ '^'^ ^^\J^^%^^ ^^9 ^^^ y Company Limited Raipur, Through:- The Managing Director [H.R.], C.S.E.H.C.L.Raipur Dist. Raipur [C.G.] 2. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Transmission [PARESHAN] Company Limited Raipur, Through'.-The Managing Director, Transmission [PARESHAN], Dist. Raipur [C.G.] 3. The Superintending Engineer, Testing & Coinraunication, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Transmission [PARESHAN] Company Limited Raipur, ^ Dist. Raipur [C.G.] ^. ^ -^i8fc-^aipTar-[e?gH 4. The Executive Engineer, Testing & Comniunication, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Transmission [PARESHAN] Company Limited Raipur, Dist. Raipur [C.G.] WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : 81LMPUR WRiT PETITiON (S) N0.5941 OF 2009 PETJTIONER RESPQNDENTS Guial Patre Versus Chhattisgarh State Electriclty Holdling Company Ljmlted, Ralpur & Othars (Writ petition under Artic(e 226 of the Constitutlon of Sndila) Single Bench : Hon'bSe Shri Ssttsh K. Agnlhotri, J. Gowri Present:- Shri Vijay K. Deshmukh, counsel for the petstioner. Shri RX. Jals^val, counsel for the respondents. ORDER (ORAD (Passed on thts 20th day of October, 2009) 1) With the consent of teamed counsei for the pariies, the petjtjon Is heard finaliy. 2) Learned counse! appearlng for the petitloner, on instructions, submits thattie petitioner does not wantto contest this petitlon on inerits at this stage; however, learned counse! for the petitioner sybmits that the representatlon dated 15-6-2009 (Annexure - P/7) submttted by the petltioner Is pending consideratlon before the respondent authorities and they may be directed to consider and dedde the same withln a stipulated period. 3) Learned -counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the pending representatlon of the petltioner vvould be ^onsldered and decided, in accordance with law and on Its own merits, wilhln a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thls order. 4) - in view of foregoing, according to the teamed counsei appearing for the petltioner, nothlng sumves in this petitlon for adjydication. 5) AccordingSy, the writ petitlon Is dlsposed of. —— Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge