1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6570 OF 2008 Dileep M. Wagh & Ors. ... Petitioners. Versus Seva Ashram Shikshan Sanstha & Ors. .... Respondents. Mr. N. R. Bubna for the Petitioners. Mr. P. A. Thorat for Respondent Nos.2,3,5 & 7. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED : 9TH APRIL, 2009. P.C.: This writ petition has been filed by the four persons, who have been transferred. One of the main ground challenging the transfer of these petitioners from one school to another in same Taluka is that they had made some police complaint of misappropriation against certain respondents and therefore they were transferred. In the counter affidavit it is stated that the police complaint was filed on 18th July, 2008 and the transfer orders were passed much before that on 28th June, 2008. 2. The second contention is that the Education Officer had observed that no approval would be granted because the transfer had been effected in the midst of the academic year. Learned Counsel for the respondents 2 submits that the approval was subsequently granted. The petitioners have already joined and therefore this objection may not be available to them at this stage. 3. The third submission made was that before Charity Commissioner, an undertaking had been given by the respondents that they would not interfere in the school management till the final hearing of an interim prayer in a petition pending before the Charity Commissioner. Making transfer of a teacher from one school to another by the Management cannot be considered to be an interference in the management of the school. 4. For these reasons, we do not find any merit in the writ petition which is hereby dismissed. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)