In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R. F. A. No. 5945 of 2009 (O&M) Ram Partap alias Partap Puri and others ..... Appellants vs State of Haryana and another .... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. P. S. Jammu, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. The landowners are in appeal before this court against the award of the learned court below passed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the State of Haryana vide notification dated 23.7.2002, issued under Section 4 of the Act, acquired land falling in the revenue estates of villages Ottu, Chak Sahiba, Moujdin, Madho Singhana and Mallekan, Tehsil and District Sirsa for construction of Kasawa Minor from RD 0 to 40200. The Land Acquisition Collector vide his award dated 11.3.2003 assessed the market value of the acquired land. The land owners feeling dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below enhanced the compensation of the acquired land. It is the award of the learned court below which is impugned in the present appeal. Learned counsels for the appellants submitted that the claim of the appellants in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in RFA No. 3831 of 2007 – Hardev Singh and others vs State of Haryana and another decided on 14.9.2010. Accordingly, for the reasons mentioned in the aforesaid judgment, the appeal is disposed of in the same terms. 8.10.2010 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge