IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.380 of 2008 RAJU KUMAR & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 29.8.2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Both the petitioners are accused in a case under sections 302/34/120(B) of I.P.C. Both the accused are juvenile. On perusal of the impugned order as well as the F.I.R., it appears that petitioner no.2 Jitendra Kumar is said to be the assailant of the victim. Accordingly, I am not inclined to release the petitioner no.2 Jitendra Kumar on bail as it would defeat the ends of justice. Accordingly, this revision of Jitendra Kumar is hereby rejected. However, so far the case of other petitioner, namely, Raju Kumar is concerned, he is not the assailant of the victim. Allegation against him is that he exhorted the other petitioner to fire. This petitioner has remained in jail custody for last one year. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, petitioner no.1 Raju Kumar is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Magadh Division, Gaya in Tr.No.145(J) of 2007 arising out of Arwal P.S. Case No.8 of 2007. Accordingly, this revision petition is partially allowed in a - 2 - N.H./ manner said above. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )