IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16539 of 2010 8 6.12.2010 1. RAJNISH CHAUDHARY S/O SRI RAMA SHANKAR CHAUDHARY R/O VILL BADHWA, P.O.BADHWA, P.S.MAHISHA, DISTT-SAHARSA, UP MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BADHWA, BLOCK-MAHISHA, DISTT-SAHARSA ….. PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE null SAHARSA 3. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE null SAHARSA SADAR, DISTT-SAHARSA 4. DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER null SAHARSA 5. BLOCK MARKETING OFFICER MAHISHI BLOCK, DISTT-SAHARSA 6. GAURI KANT SAH 7. BUCHI CHOUDHARY BOTH DEALERS OF PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, BADHWA PANCHAYAT, MAHISHI BLOCK,P.O. MAHISHI, DIST. SAHARSA ….. RESPONDENTS ------- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel appearing for the licensees under Public Distribution System, respondents no.6 and 7. Petitioner is Up- Mukhiya and he wants action against the two dealers, respondents no.6 and 7 on various allegations. On behalf of the respondents no.6 and 7 it has been submitted that in view of such allegations their licences were cancelled but after - 2 - enquiry and proper findings their licences have been restored and the petitioner still wants to harass them for ulterior reasons. We are not in a position to go into disputed facts as to whether the allegations made by the petitioner are correct or not. This should not be appropriate and proper in a public interest litigation of the present nature. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of. If the petitioner is still dissatisfied with the action taken against the respondents no.6 and 7 then he will be at liberty to set the law in motion in accordance with law. sk (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)