( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1318 OF 2009 Shaikh Pasha Shaikh Omar PETITIONER VERSUS The Maharashtra State Cooperative Housing Finance Corporation Ltd. & others RESPONDENTS .... Mr. M.S. Indani, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Chavan, advocate for the respondents No. 1 and 2. .... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 30th July, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. The notice dated 14th January, 2009, issued by the respondent No. 2, is the subject matter of challenge in this petition. The relevant prayers made by the petitioner are thus : “(A) Call for the record and proceedings of the case; (B) By issuing a writ of certiorari, orders or any other appropriate writ in the nature of writ of certiorari, the impugned notice dated ( 2 ) 14-01-2009 issued by the respondent No. 2 may kindly be quashed and set aside. (C) Pending hearing and final disposal of this writ petition, the respondents No. 1 and 2 may kindly be restrained from taking coercive against the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned notice dated 14.1.2009.” 3. Counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2 makes a statement that the notice dated 14th January, 2009 has been withdrawn and, therefore, no more attempt is being made to take over possession of the house property which is allegedly mortgaged against the loan which was allegedly taken by the petitioner from the respondent No. 3. In this view of the matter, nothing survives in the petition. The petition is, therefore, disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to agitate the questions if any adverse action is taken or that if he decides to raise dispute under section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/wp1318-2009