1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4793 OF 2006 Kothure Vividh Karyakari Sahakari (Vikas) Seva Sanstha Maryadit .. Petitioner. Vs. The Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Niphad Dist.Nashik & Others .. Respondents. Mr.S.M.Sabrad for the petitioner. Mr.A.H.Palekar AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3. Mr.P.N.Joshi for respondent no.4. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 21ST AUGUST, 2006 DATED : 21ST AUGUST, 2006 DATED : 21ST AUGUST, 2006 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent no.4 and learned AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3. 2. This petition is directed against the order of vacating the stay to the registration granted on 21.4.2006 to the respondent-society. As a result of the order dated 21.4.2006 the respondent-society has been functioning since then. That order was carried in the revision by the petitioner. The revisional authority also confirmed the said order vide its order dated 12th July, 2006. Admittedly, the appeal is still pending before the Divisional Joint Registrar, 2 2 2 Nashik Division, Nashik. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case I am satisfied that the following order shall meet the ends of justice: . The Divisional Joint Registrar, Nashik Division, Nashik shall decide Appeal No.A-26 of 2006 as expeditiously as possible and preferrably within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of this order. In the meanwhile, the directions issued by respondent no.1 - Assistant Registrar dated 29.7.2006 to the petitioner to transfer shares to the respondent-society shall remain stayed till the disposal of the appeal. The respondent-society is, however, allowed to function in pursuance of the orders passed by the authorities below. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)