1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1371 /2010 (Pahalrajrai Jeevatram Jawaharmalani vs. The State of Maharashtra) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr R P Joshi Adv. for applicant Mrs A R Taiwade, APP for respondent CORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED : 17 th September, 2010. Heard. 2. Interim anticipatory bail was granted on 2nd September,2010. It is alleged that the applicant is the purchaser of the property and acted recklessly. According to learned Advocate for the applicant, the role attributed about cheating the Bank was mainly in respect of vendor of the property and not the purchaser. 3. Learned APP’s brusque response is that she has no knowledge as to whether the statement of the present applicant is recorded or not after interim anticipatory bail was granted. While, learned Advocate for the applicant stated that the statement of the applicant has already been recorded after interim anticipatory bail was granted. Be that as it may, it does appear that Regular Civil Suit is pending which is already referred to in the order dated 2nd September,2010. 2 4. The interim anticipatory bail granted on 2nd September, 2010 stands confirmed subject to same conditions. JUDGE Sahare