1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :28.04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.VIMALA C.S.No.1526 of 1995 and O.A.Nos.4328 and 701 of 2013 1. K.Ravi (Deceased) 2. R.Lakshmi 3. R.Nithya 4. R.Shaluni (Minor) Rep. By mother & guardian R.Lakshmi (Plaintiffs 2 to 4 are impleaded as Legal Representatives of the Deceased K.Ravi as per the order dated 28.06.2013 made in A.No.2661 of 2013) ... Plaintiffs Vs. 1. K.M.Kesavan @ Kesavaram (Deceased) 2. Suguna 3. P.Sumathy 4. K.Ramadevi (D2 to D4 are brought on record as Legal heirs of the deceased first defendant as per the order of this Court dated 28.11.2011 made in A.No.5169 of 2011) ... Defendants PRAYER: Plaint under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S.Rules r/w. Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C., praying for passing of a decree and Judgement against the defendant: (i) to divide the suit properties mentioned by metes and bounds 2 and allot his ½ separate share in the same; (ii) directing the 1st defendant to pay a sum of Rs.61,250/- being the past mesne profits for the period from January 1995 to till date; (iii) directing the first defendant to pay future mesne profits at the rate of Rs.8,750/- p.m. from the date of plaint till the date of delivery of his separate ½ share in the suit schedule properties; (iv) to pay the cost of the suit For Plaintiffs : Mr.M.Devendran For Defendants : Mr.M.D.Ashraf Ali JUDGMENT Today, plaintiffs 2 and 3 and defendants 2 to 4 are present in person, before this Court along with their respective counsel. 2. Both the parties have filed a joint memo of compromise, wherein, the property to be allotted has been indicated in the compromise memo. 3. In the memo of compromise, it is evident that plaintiffs 2 to 4 are allotted 6518 sq. ft. and defendants 2 to 4 are allotted 6520 sq. ft. 3 4. The second plaintiff has filed an affidavit stating that the proposed compromise is for the benefit and welfare of the 4th plaintiff, namely, R.Shaluni. 5. It is not in dispute that the proposed compromise is for the benefit and welfare of the minor 4th plaintiff. 6. In such circumstances, this Court hold that the proposed compromise is for the benefit and welfare of the minor 4th plaintiff. The joint memo of compromise filed by the parties is recorded. There shall be a decree in terms of joint memo of compromise as the parties to the compromise memo have agreed the terms of joint memo of compromise to be correct and true. The joint memo of compromise shall form part of the decree. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous applications are closed. 28.04.2015 ogy/arr 4 S.VIMALA, J. ogy/arr C.S.No.1526 of 1995 28.04.2015