IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.266 of 2007 1. Kailash Choudhary, son of Mahadeo Choudhary 2. Yugal Choudhary, son of late Dhaneshwar Choudhary 3. Nand Lal Choudhary, son of Govind Choudhary 4. Suresh Mandal, son of Pradeep Mandal 5. Mostt. Lalita Devi, wife of late Bindeshwari Mandal 6. Ayodhi Mandal son of Sri Raghubir Mandal 7. Devendra Mandal, son of late Bhagwan Mandal 8. Yogendra Mandal,a son of Dasrath Mandal 9. Tenhi Mandal, son of Mohan Mandal 10. Balai Mandal, son of Khunjo Mandal 11. Kamal Kishore Mandal, son of Sri Lakshman Mandal 12. Kapildeo Mandal, son of Sukhdeo Mandal 13. Mostt. Jhakho Devi, wife of Uchit Mandal 14. Chaturbhuj Das, son of Bala Das 15. Pappu Mandal, son of Yogendra Mandal 16. Chalitar Mandal, son of Pradeep Mandal 17. Shital Mandal, son of Mithni Das 18. Nageshwar Mandal, son of Shital Mandal 19. Hiralal Choudhary, son of late Faudar Choudhary 20. Sadanand Mandal, son of late Mogal Mandal 21. Chamaklal Mandal son of late Mogal Mandal 22. Prakash Choudhary, son of late late Mangan Choudhary 23. Arun Kumar Mandal, son of Sri Munilal Mandal 24. Dasrath Mandal, son of Bhathari Mandal 25. Ram Chandra Mandal, son of Chunchun Mandal 26. Jagdish Mandal, son of Mahabir Mandal 27. Bhagawat Mandal, son of late Sukdeo Mandal 28. Naresh Rajak, son of Lakshman Rajak All residents of village Bhindas Tola, P.O. Tintanga, P.S. Gopalpur, Gopalpur, District Bhagalpur. ……Defendant 2nd Party/Petitioners versus 1. Bihar Bhudhan Yagya Committee, through its Chairman , Kadam Kuan , Patna;-4. 2. Rajendra Prasad Sah alias Rajendra Sah, son of Pirthwi Chandra Sah 3. Prithwi Chand Sah son of Jaipal Sah 4. Bina Devi, d/o Pirthwi Chandra Sah 5. Sadhna Devi, d/o pirthwi Chandra Sah 6. Shambhu Prasad, son of Gaurab Prasad Sah 7. Shushil Prasad, son of Suman Prasadd 8. Rantesh Kumar, son of late Krishna Mohan Pd. Sao 9. Amit Kumar 10. Ashish Kumar Both sons of Kantesh Prasad 11. Amrendra Kumar, son of Amit Kumar 12. Ashok Prasad son of Ashish Kumar 13. Deepak Kumar alias Rahul Kumar, son of late Krishna Mohan Prasad Sah. 2 14. Subhash Prasad alias Jai Prakash, son of late Raghunandan Prasad Sah. 15. Shashi Bhushan Prasad, son of late Raghunandan Pd. Sah 16. Dinesh Prasad, son of late Raghunandan Sah 17. Jawahar Prasad, son of late Raghunadan Sah 18. Rajnish Prasad, son of Dinesh Prasad 19. Amrit Prasad, son of Avinash Prasad 20. Rajesh Kumar, son of Rajendra Prasad Sah 21. Bhairab Prasad Sah, son of Rajesh Kumar 22. Rakesh Kumar, son of Rajendra Prasad Sah 23. Anant Kumar, son of Rakesh Kumar 24. Smt. Rekha Devi, d/o Rajendra Prasad Sah. All residents of village Ratanganj, P.S. Gopalpur, District Bhagalpur. ……..Plaintiffs-Opposite Parties. ----------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the Opp. Parties: Mr. Ashok Kumar Keshari, Advocate. -------- 03/ 13.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This civil revision has been filed by the defendants second party-petitioners challenging order dated 19.12.2006, by which learned Subordinate Judge-II, Naugachia (Bhagalpur) allowed the plaintiffs-petitioners to take steps for confirmation of signatures of the plaintiffs and handwriting of defendant no.4 (Secretary, Bhudan Yagya Committee ) on the form, which was exhibited and proved by defendant no.4 as D.W.17. 3. The aforesaid suit was filed by the plaintiffs- opposite parties for declaration of their title and confirmation of their possession over the suit land and also for declaring that the alleged Danpatra, said to have been executed by one of the ancestors of the plaintiffs in favour of Bhudan Yagya Committee was forged and fabricated as well as for other reliefs. 4. It transpires that the defendants appeared in the suit 3 and contested it, whereafter on the basis of the pleadings of the parties issues were framed and while evidence of the defendants were being led, defendant no. 4 ( Secretary of the Bhudan Yagya Committee ) deposed as D.W. 17 exhibiting a form claiming it to be filled up by him and signed by one of the ancestors of the plaintiffs. 5. It transpires that in these circumstances the plaintiffs filed a petition in the court below on 06.12.2006 for confirmation of the signature and writing of the Secretary of the Bhudan Yagya Committee ( defendant no.4) over the said form. This application filed by the plaintiffs has been allowed by the learned court below vide its impugned order. 6. After considering the arguments of the parties and perusing the materials on record, including the impugned order, it transpires that the order of the learned court below was quite justified and was required for proper and full adjudication of the dispute between the parties. Furthermore, this Court does not find any illegality or jurisdiction error in the impugned order of the learned court below and, accordingly, this civil revision is dismissed. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )