THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.10694 of 2007 Dated:12.06.2007 Between: Kornana Simhachalam. …Petitioner and The Tahasildar and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.10694 of 2007 ORDER: Aggrieved by the Possession Certificate issued by the first respondent to the third respondent, the petitioner filed an appeal before the second respondent, which is pending. In the meanwhile, alleging that there is a serious threat of dispossession, the petitioner filed the instant Writ Petition. The case was called in the vacation Court, and it was adjourned to enable the learned Counsel for the petitioner to obtain a copy of the Possession Certificate issued to the third respondent. Learned Counsel says that though he applied, he did not receive the same. Be that as it is, as the appeal before the second respondent is pending, while ordering status quo as on today, this Court directs the second respondent to dispose of the said appeal within a period of ten (10) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is, however, made clear that if the third respondent has already availed any loans or any benefits based on the Possession Certificate, the petitioner will not be entitled to the benefit of the status quo order. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 12.06.2007 Note: Issue C.C by tomorrow. B/o. vs