SINGLE BENCh ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER \-K\^ lo^^ ^ .^^ 'x^x ^ y^>^ ^" ^ <:':yf... 'y W.P.(S) N0. ^^l^ /2010 Smt. Esther Martin (before marriage Ku. Esther Kripal Singh) W/o Shri Anil Martin, aged about 55 years, Mission Middle School, Vishrampur, Block Simga, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS :f'^/ 9 { W/^^^ } ® (^-L-—-T.< : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education officer, Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Simga, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 4. Treasury Officer, Treasury, Accounts and Pension, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. IC—78~ 3TI^T'SFT f^te 'd^T ^TI^T^RTO 1; ^WC'ST^lW^ -g~oc[ ^ll^lld^, ^tll<H4J(o, [®idl^^< ^...yR.(S^..w....^.4^^200 3TT^7 TR^7 ( yif^^) ^^T^ ^rf^f 3?T^T SB : Hon'bSe Shri Manindra rv1oh*n Shrivastava. J, 26-07-2010 Shri Somkant Verma, counsjei Shri Ajit Slngh, Panel Law^ copy. Heard. Learned counsel appearing is entitied to benefit of two aa'vart passea8 B.Ed. examination befor^ submitted that the issue Invoivedi integra and the same has been fm^Vw In the case of Ashst Sajcena y&\ 9 5S. it is further submitted that thisj order dated OS-02-2009 passed| counsei for the petjtioner futfner d| 29-04-2010 passed In Writ Appeaij judgment of the Supreme Court in| order passed by this Court in 311) have been issued for considerati< increments as per circuiar dated ^ Prau'esh, after verification ofthe fa4 Learned counsei for the petitioner vyouid aiso be considerecj ^Hf<1^1vl 'RTR^tf ^f fs^l Tf^5R ^'3tRR37T^T for the petitioner. ?er for the State/respondents on advance ^or the petitioner submits that the petitioner |ce increments on account of she havJng her appointment at her own cost. it is in the present petition is no ionger res |iliy decided by the Hon'bie Supreme Court \tate ofM.P. S. Ors. 2003 (lii) fSC) I Courl" has aiso taken a slmiiar view in his in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned 1-aws attention of this Court to order dated [No.124 of 2009, wherein reiying upot-i the |the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the ^ther Writ Appeai No.87/2009, dSrections [>n of the case for grant of two advance 11-09-1974 issued by the State of Madhya |ts pieaded in the petEtion. respondents submits that case of the on the same iines. ^'^y^-x,x i '?SJ_ t|?^^H€—78 tllNCTi ^KI^ 7^r r^i^i<yi^, ^ti1^^<o, [^<ni<H^< ..^.(61>^..:..^.?..l£fLS^200 3TI^?T TraW (li°l?<l<s<<^) 3^^1'^Tf^fNT ^T^TT 3?TT^T 9D^i^ Dyypi! '^RTTW^Tf^cT ^IT^T in view of tne statementTri; with a direction to the responden^ of the petitioner for grant of tw4 21-09-1974 issued by the State facts pleaded in the petition withiti <=»)j^(cn4Ti 'RPT^yf ^f ftTsi' <F3i^i< ^ 3tRW 3T?^5T iaae auove, ihss peiition is finaily disposed of authorities to consider and decide the claim advance increments as per circular dated 0f Madhya Pradesh, after verification of the a period of eight weeks from today. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge