IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 4479 of 2000 Between: D.Venkateswarlu, S/o Ramaiah, Yetakpaka (post), Badrachalam Mandal, Khammam Dist., ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Rep by its Preseding Officer, Warangal District. 2 The Depot Manger, APSRTC, Bhadrachalam Depot, Khammam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of CERTIORARI and after calling records from the 1st respondent in I.D.No.57/94 and quash the award dt 4-7-97 in so far as denying the continuity of service backwages and all other attendent benefits and consequently direct the respondets to grant the same to the petitioner; and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following : ORDER : Sri Mahesh, learned counsel appeared on behalf of Sri G.Ravi Mohan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. ____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J MARCH 12, 2009 KSH