IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 1169 of 2010 Smt. Pushpa Bhatt & another ……… Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ………. Respondents Mr. R.S. Sammal, Advocate for the applicants Mr. Nandan Arya, AGA for the State/respondent no. 1 Date of Judgment : 22.03.2011 JUDGMENT Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. There is no scope of interference either with the charge sheet or with the order taking cognizance thereon, inasmuch as, it has been alleged in the charge sheet that by reason of an interpolation made on the G.P.F. passbook, the applicant No. 2 drew more than what he was entitled to and that the same was used for the treatment of applicant No. 1. In other words, it has been alleged that applicant No. 2 withdrew more than what he was entitled to withdraw by reason of the said endorsement on the passbook and used the withdrawal for treatment of his wife. In the fitness of things, it would be appropriate for the applicants to respond to the summons issued. If they do so within four weeks from today and if they apply or any of them applies for bail, let their bail applications be heard by the concerned Magistrate on the same day. 2. The application is disposed of accordingly. (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 22.03.2011 Aswal