1 S.B. Cr. Bail Application No. 4094/2007 (Raju Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 07.09.2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. R.S.Choudhary on behalf of Mr. G.R.Punia for the petitioner. Mr. V.R.Mehta, P.P. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and public prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and police investigation diary. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the injuries have been inflicted by co-accused Mukesh and allegation against the present petitioner is that he caught hold injured Bajrang Singh. Public prosecutor appearing for the State opposed the bail application and contended that it was the present petitioner who caught hold the injured Bajrang and facilitated the co-accused Mukesh to inflict knife injury in chest. The injured was admitted to the hospital, underwent the operation and treated. On perusal of the police investigation diary, more particularly the report of the Medical Board, it appears that the Medical Board was of the opinion that the patient got injury on the chest which was dangerous to life as treated by Surgeon of C.H.C. Kuchaman City, Nagaur confirmed by Associate Professor, J.L.N.V., Ajmer. Keeping in view the serious allegation against the present petitioner that he caught hold the injured and co- 2 accused inflicted knife injury and the injury as opined by the Medical Board has been found to be dangerous to life, in my view, it is not a fit case to release the petitioner on bail at this stage. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the bail application. The bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is therefore, dismissed as not pressed. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp