J^-^ S.B. (Service Mattert IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION(S) N0.^1 C?-J / 2011. PETITIONER: ^s&:^ ^.^•••^^•^'t,»..„..--•••-"" 1:"" l \ l...' '.^^\^-" ^eA.-<-"'\y\ Keshwar Nath, son of Amar Sai, aged about 29 years, Watchman, Pahadi Korba Ashrani, Tirang, Block Batouli, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents 1.^ State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, ^ D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. . ^" 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Sarguja,, . Chhattisgarh. 4. Collector, Sarguja, District Sarguja, ^ Chhattisgarh. 5. Block Education Officer, Block Batouli, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (^ XI-HC—78 *i(*i^r ^»Hich 'TST ^ww^, y>nl-(H<i<o, [sidi^y; ,.......^....^zl!.i^/J..!,^200 3TT^?TTRW (ll°lf<l<s<^) W^T ^RT ^Jch 'cT^H ^T1^?T 5r»^ict) ^RHW Trft^T 3TT^T ^ cr>i^fcri41t ^w^i ^ ^S <f^<^{< ^ 3TRPT 3:n^?r [SB ; Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava. J.1 22.6.2011 1- Shri C.J. K. Rao with ^ petitioner. copy. Leamed coiuisel for tN Shri Akshay Yadav counsel for tlie Shri N. Naha Roy, Panep. Lawyer for fhe State, on advance petitioner submits that the issue relating to claim of contra.c|tual payment to (3ook and other employees came up for consid|eration before this Court m W.P. (S) No.2004/11 and batch of petijtions and aft.er examining tlie claim of the petitioners, this Cour^ had directed consideration of the case in those cases. He subin|its that the case of the petitioner is covered by the aforesaid ordeij On the ofher hand^ 1( that the representation of due verification. led counsel for the State submits petitioner would be decided afiter After gomg through th^ order dated 15,4,2011 passed in W.P. (S) No.2004/11, it is ap|)arent tliat fhe case ofthe petitioner is squarely covered by fh^ aforesaid order. Therefore, the petitioner is also entiUed to ft^e saiae direction in fhe case. Accordingly, it is direct^d tliat if the petitiqner makes fresh. T'-pT'popntiai-inn bfifbre the coricemed a.ufhorifry, claiming psyment t/ / XI-HC—78 y T^T ^INM^, ^ti1^j(^ i^ldiyy ^ww{ le?»»n^» "^ 200 ^?T ^f^K (ll°tij<sl<i^) 'STI^T ^T f^FF ^T^H ^ll^l %i*ii<st) 'P:cITW^rft^ 37T^T 2- ts' Praveen of minimmn wages applicab] Chhattisgarh Civil Service the same shall be disposed period of eight weeks fi representation. In the event woi.Ud be at liberty to file writ to a contract employee under fhe ((pontoract Appointment) Rules, 2004, |3f in accordance witli law, within a |om tihe date of submission of |of any adverse order, fhe petitioner petition afresh. Witli the aforesald dire|;tion, fhe petition is finally disposed of. <:ni<it<rt<I1<i '^^i ^ f^t <f^^« ^3?fTO3^T Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge l^