IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20958 of 2010 SANTOSH PRASAD Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Arti Devi ------ 2/ 30/06/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that though he has been alleged for demand and torture for its non- fulfillment but marriage is intercaste opposed by the complainant’s father. Finding this circumstance, restitution case has also been filed in the family court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 1245 of 2009 T.R. No. 1444 of 2010 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)