"•^'s;-,. ^^ 1 %^m 1 ^ 'm^ -^- Ll^^r ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH Coram HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. & WON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. WRIT PETmON (PILVNo. 480 of 2009 PETITIQNER: RESPONDENTS Mahettarial Sahu, S/o. Lataluram Sahu, Aged about 41 years, Working as Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat - Devpuri, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary Department of Revenue, O.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. 2. The Coltector, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. The S.D.O., District Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Tahsildar, Ralpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITtON UNDER ARTICLE 228 OF THE CONSTrrUTION OF INDIA Present: Shri Ashok Soni, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, leamed Govemment Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER (17th February, 2009) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: Shri Sumesh Bajaj, learned Government Advocate has raised a preliminary objection about the maintainability ofthe writ petition styled as 'Public Interest Litigation' on the ground that the petitioner has a statutory remedy for redressal of the grievances projected in the writ petition. \\.. w ^.^^s· /^ ^ y^ L^. ^ ••-a^—l-1 ~~^] ^^s^ \^\ 2) Shri Ashok Soni, learned counsel for the petltioner, in view of the above objection, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty of availing the statutory remedies available to the petitioner under the relevant provisions of law. 3) Permission granted. 4) With the above liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5) The security amount of Rs.5,000/- deposited by the petjtioner be refunded to the petitioner. — —-— Sd/- Chief Justice / Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge subbu