IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19951 of 2010 DILIP KUMAR YADAV, SON OF SRI SURYA NARAYAN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 406, 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had defalcated a sum of Rs. 20,000/- but subsequently he deposited a sum of Rs. 35,973/- i.e. the total defalcated with interest amount which is apparent from Annexure-2. In view of such, in the event of surrender of the petitioner, named above, within four weeks from today in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case no. 76 of 2009, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) Cr. P.C., and (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner shall undertake to be represented on the first 2 date after cognizance and in case he fails to do so, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled,(iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to the cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)