IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27202 of 2010 LALLAN YADAV Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 01.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The tempo of the informant’s son was hired by seven accused persons. Thereafter, his dead body was only found. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has not been named by the informant even in his protest, his name appeared in the case diary only after three months that also in the statement of two witnesses stating that they were suspecting petitioner’s hand in killing. So, basing suspicion, refusal of anticipatory bail in discussed circumstances is not justified. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No. 69 of 2009 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)