1 CRI.APPLN.NO.5179/2010 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5179/2010. (Rizwan s/o Rauf Pathan Vs. The State of Mah.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.JV Deshpande, Adv. for applicant. Mr.NB Patil, APP for State. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 6 th January, 2011. ... 1) Heard. 2) In a matrimonial controversy, the wife prosecuted the husband with allegations of mental harassment, torture and beating, giving rise to registration of the offence, vide Crime No.I-158/2010. Except the husband, other relations are directed to be released on bail in the event of their arrest. 3) The marriage of the applicant with the wife on 12.7.2009 is not in controversy. The applicant is a post-graduate, duly employed and serving at Mumbai. The record reveal the family is known to each other since long, they belong to service class. It hardly prima facie appears that the applicant would make a demand of Rs.2 lakh to the parents of 2 CRI.APPLN.NO.5179/2010 the wife. However, on such allegations, the prosecution is initiated. 4) Considering the nature of allegations and the accused/applicant is staying at Malad Mumbai and is in the employment, there are least chances of his coercing and particularly the wife, who is at her parental house at Bhusawal. In the event of arrest of the applicant/accused, the husband, he be released on his furnishing PR bond and surety in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand). The accused/applicant shall surrender his Passport to the concerned Police, if any. The applicant/accused shall not coerce the witnesses. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/