1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 796/2008 (Smt. Rajashree Narendra Shelke & anr. Vs. State & ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM :D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 29, 2008. Heard Mr. Ukey for the petitioners. The grievance of the petitioners is that the petitioners are entitled to seek employment on compassionate ground. It is submitted that for want of reservation in the impugned advertisement for the candidates who could be appointed on the compassionate ground, the advertisement is bad in law. The contention is misconceived and, therefore, cannot be accepted. So far as the appointment on compassionate ground is concerned, it is governed by different 2 Government Resolutions and, therefore, it is futile to canvass that the advertisement in question be declare as invalid or bad in law for want of reservation for this category. Consequently, writ petition suffers from lack of merits and hence same is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE RMP