MC 1955/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. J. Payeng, learned counsel appearing for the applicants. Also heard Mr . M.A. Sheikh, learned counsel appearing for the O.P./writ petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bora, learned Government Advocate is appearing on behalf of the official respond ents. This application is for the vacation of the interim order passed by this Court on 10.5.2010 in WP(C) 2657/2010, whereby all further actions in pursuant to the notice dated 4.5.2010 in respect of the No Confidence Motion against the President of Rangapani Gaon Panchayat has been suspended by the Court. The Cour t passed the said interim order on the basis of the submissions made on behalf o f the writ petitioner that the President was never approached to convene the No Confidence Meeting after the requisition was given by the applicant despite earl ier order passed by the Court in WP(C) 5893/2009. It appears that the Secretary of the Rangapani Gaon Panchayat has filed an affidavit-in-opposition on 1.7.2010 wherein it is averred that after a meeti ng was requisitioned to discuss the No Confidence Meeting against the President (writ petitioner), the Secretary had put up a note in the official file before t he President seeking her approval for convening a meeting to discuss the No Conf idence Motion against her. But the President did not accord any permission to co nvene the meeting and sent back the file to the Secretary and accordingly the Se cretary was not able to convene the meeting. This averment of the Secretary, Gao n Panchayat has gone unrebutted by the writ petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bora, learned Government Advocate on the basis of the records availabl e endorses the stand of the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat to the effect that t he requisitionist’s notice was placed before the President of the Gaon Panchayat and she failed to accord approval to the Secretary for convening the meeting de spite knowledge of the requisition. In the above circumstances, I find that the very basis for passing the i nterim order on 10.5.2010 have been proved to be false and the assertion made by the writ petitioner in that regard stands disproved from the official records a vailable with the learned Government Advocate as well as the averments made in t he affidavit-in-opposition filed by the Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat. In view of the above, I am of the considered opinion that there is no ju stification to continue with the interim order passed by this Court on 10.5.2010 and accordingly the same stands vacated. Misc. case is accordingly allowed.