IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8948 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 17, 2010. Parminder Kaur .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Surmukh Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a direction to allow her to resume her duty as an Education Provider. From the reply (Annexure P-6) submitted by respondent Nos.5 & 6 to the legal notice dated 9.3.2010 (Annexure P-5) served on behalf of the petitioner, it appears that respondent Nos.5 & 6 have taken a plea that the petitioner has resigned from the service. This fact is seriously disputed by the petitioner. In these circumstances and owing to the fact that the Writ Court cannot resolve such like disputed question of facts, this writ petition is disposed with liberty to the petitioner to represent before respondent No.2 who, on receipt of the same, shall resolve the above-stated factual C.W.P.No .8948 of 2010 2 controversy by passing a speaking order, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receiving such a representation. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 17, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE