HIG COURT FCH TTIS " TBILASPUR SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRI'I‘INKER D1WAK§R CRM.P, N0. 25712010 PETITIONER Archana Agrawal . Vel‘SU S RESPONDENTS State d Chhattisgarh & . Another Shri Manish Shanna, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, P.L. for the State. PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CREG. 01mm (12.07.2010) Service report of respondent No.2 shows that the said espondent is residing outside India, Shri Shanna submits that ends of justice would serve if direction be issued to the Superintendent of Police, Raipur to look into the matter and to take appropriate steps. He submits that the petitioner and respondent No.2 have already compromised the matter but yet the sword is hanging on the petitioner as the FIR has been registered against the petitioner. He further submits that a bare reading of the FIR would show that the dispute is purely of civil nature and if the Superintendent of Police, Raipur considers all the aspects of the case, the petitioner mayget justice. He submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition. Counsel for the State has no objection if the petitioner approaches the Superintendent of Police, Raipur for the redressal of her grievance. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw thevpresent petition with liberty to approach the Superintendent of Police Raipur and it is expected from the Superintendent of Police, Raipur to look into the matter and to take necessary action. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court again in case, her grievance still survives. With the above observation, the petition stands disposed of. 1‘. ' § i Sdl— i ?ritinker Diwakel‘ Judge r