1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10591 OF 2010 Dnyanoba Ramkishan Ghodke ...Petitioner Versus Shardabai W/o Bhaskar Ghodke & others ...Respondents ..... Mr. s.V. Suryawanshi , advocate for the petitioner ..... CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 26TH NOVEMBER, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 This Writ Petition is filed, challenging the order passed by the Trial Court below Exh. 50 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 36 of 2003, dated 12-10-2010. 2 It appears that taking into consideration the findings recorded by the Trial Court that the original respondent No. 1/ petitioner herein is in possession of the disputed suit properties including Suvey Nos. 28 & 39. The Trial Court has directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 400/- per month each to appellant No. 1 to 3. Now, the contention of the counsel 2 appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner is not in possession on the disputed property including the Survey No. 38 & 39 cannot be gone into in this Writ Petition i.e. not the question before this Court. Therefore, possible view has been taken by the Appellate Court, no interference is called for, the Writ Petition is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) SDM*