1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.1828/1997 Brijmohan Rathore & Ors. v/s State of Raj. & Anr. DATE OF ORDER ::: MAY 22, 2009 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Smt. Madhuri Singh, for the petitioners. Shri B.C. Chirania, for the respondents. BY THE COURT : Shri B.C. Chirania, learned counsel for the respondents contended that the petitioners have been regularised on their respective post and regular pay scale has also been granted to them, therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that she is not in a position to confirm the contention of the learned counsel for the respondents as the petitioners have not contacted her. Further, she submits that the writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement of the learned counsel for the respondents with liberty to the petitioners to move an application for restoration of the writ petition in case the statement of the 2 learned counsel for the respondents is not found to be correct. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioners as prayed for. No order as to costs. (Narendra Kumar Jain), J. chauhan/