IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 13TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 22ND BHADRA 1929 WP(C).No. 23031 of 2007(P) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. P.P.ABDULLA, S/O MOOSA, PUTHENPURAYIL, VANIMEL P.O., VADAKARA. 2. K.C.SURENDRAN, KUTTAYICHALIL HOUSE, NIDUMPARAMBA, KALLACHI, VADAKARA. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT: ----------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VADAKARA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.R.SABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.23031/07 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED IN RESPECTOF KL-11 H 6417. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 25.4.2007. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPLACEMENT APPLICATION DATED 4.7.07. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNCATION DATED 20.7.07. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.12000/2007 DATED 6.6.07. //TRUE COPY// ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 23031 OF 2007 ==================== Dated this the 13th day of September, 2007 J U D G M E N T By Ext.P2, transfer of permit was allowed by the RTA and in implementation of the said order, petitioner has been issued Ext.P4, asking him to produce valid insurance certificate, certificate of fitness and fitment of speed governor etc. There is no justification for demanding these documents when a transfer of permit has been allowed by the RTA. Ext.P4 will stand quashed and the respondent will take necessary action for the implementation of Ext.P2, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within four weeks of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 2. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp