THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL Nos.823 and 863 of 2009 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Mr Justice B.Prakash Rao) Since both the Writ Appeals are connected and arise out of the same order, at the instance of the learned counsel on either side, they are taken up together for disposal. Both the Management and the Medical and Sales Representatives Association of the Company concerned are before us aggrieved by the order dated 08.04.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.V.M.P.No.909 of 2009 in W.P.M.P.No.36226 of 2008 in W.P.No.47467 of 2008, wherein they sought to vacate the interim order dated 19.01.2009. Having regard to certain changes, which have been extended for the first time, the same is not sustainable. Learned Single Judge, after hearing the application filed by the Federation of the Association, restricted the stay only to the extent of the Medical and Sales Representatives Association and there is no reference to the Territory Managers. Even, there is no direction either way in regard to the other damages, which have been awarded. Hence, the appeals. Having heard the learned counsel on either side and on perusal of the material available on record, we are of the view that these two appeals arise out of an interlocutory application, which would not be in the interest of either of the parties to say anything on the merits of the objections raised. It would be better in the interest of the parties that the Writ Petition itself can be heard and disposed of at the earliest, so as to emphasis on the questions involved. Accordingly, both the Writ Appeals are disposed of. No costs. Office is directed to post Writ Petition No.27647 of 2008 on 17.08.2009 for “Final Hearing” subject to “Part Heard” before the Court hearing the matters. Both the parties shall maintain status quo in regard to the award in question. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) _________________ (SANJAY KUMAR, J) 3rd August 2009 RRB