1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3677 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3676 OF 2009 Vinod s/o Atmaram Talreja ...Applicant VERSUS Needs Agencies, through its Proprieter, Mohd. Nasiruddin s/o Mohd. Usmanoddin ...Respondent ..... Shri Shailendra Gangakhedkar, advocate for applicant absent Shri Mahesh Kale, advocate for sole respondent ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 17th June, 2010 PER COURT : 1 Perused the contents of the application. Heard learned counsel for the respondent. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 20 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Application seeking leave to file appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 13.7.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani in Criminal Appeal No. 79 of 2006. 2 3 For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily and it further appears that the delay caused in filing the accompanying application is not willful, deliberate and intentional and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 Hence, present Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 20 days caused in filing the accompanying application seeking leave to file appeal stands condoned and present Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crap3677.09