IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11378 of 2009 DHARMENDRA THAKUR, son of Girbal Thakur, resident of village- Kakraul, P.S.-Rahika, District-Madhubani-------------------Petitioner. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Punam Devi, wife of Dharmendra Thakur, daughter of Ram Bilash Thakur, resident of village-Haripur, Mal Tole, P.S.-Pandaul, District- Madhubani------------------------------------------------------Opp. Parties. ----------- 2. 17.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that differences are matrimonial in nature but no torture was caused for demand of dowry rather complainant is not ready to accept the strict matrimonial relations. Even she went to Delhi with another boy which was informed to the C.J.M., Madhubani, and when she was asked to stop her unacceptable actions, she filed this case with false allegation of demand and torture basing which refusal of petitioner’s anticipatory bail is not justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case no.253 of 2008 (T. R. no.2620 of 2008), the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri S.M.F. Bari, Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )