IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 15TH MARCH 2010 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 7370 of 2010(U) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- ROSAMMA,W/O.CHACKO,KURUSINKAL HOUSE, PARK VIEW ROAD, NORTH PARAVUR. BY ADV. MR.K.I.SAGEER IBRAHIM. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ERNAKULAM. 2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,KSEB, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION,NORTH PARAVUR. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. BIJOY CHANDRAN, R2 BY MR.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/03/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J --------------------------- W.P(C) No.7370 of 2010-U ---------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of March, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved of the steps being pursued by the second respondent for drawing the overhead line across the property and residential building of the petitioner situated in 'two cents' of land. It is stated that, pursuant to the direction given by this Court, the second respondent has passed Ext.P4, referring the matter for being adjudicated by the first respondent, way back in October 2009. It is stated that the matter was finally heard by the first respondent after giving notice to all concerned, despite which the orders are still to be passed. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved of the delay in finalising the matter, more so, when the financial institution from whom the petitioner had availed the loan for effecting construction, is very much pressuring the petitioner and that the petitioner is not in a position to enjoy the property in a peaceful manner. 3. Heard the learned standing counsel appearing for the first respondent and the learned Government Pleader appearing for W.P(C) No.7370 of 2010-U 2 the first respondent. 4. In the above circumstances, the first respondent is directed to pass final orders in the above proceedings stated as pending before him. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE ab