1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 90 OF 2009 Manoj Jain and Anr. ... Petitioners. Versus State of Maharashtra. .... Respondent. Mr. Priten P. Killedar for the Petitioners. Mrs. U. V. Kejariwal, APP for the State CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and A. R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2009. P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. Both the petitioners are also present. 2. The petitioners do not want to press this quashing petition but they submit that the investigation be completed. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioners have obtained anticipatory bail with a condition that the accused shall appear before the Police Station on every Wednesday and Thursday, but the accused did not appear in terms of the order of the court. A show cause notice was given to them as to why their bail should not be cancelled. However, today both the petitioners are 2 present and assure this Court that they will comply with the order of the Court granting bail to them. 3. In this view of the matter, we direct that for one month from today, the petitioner shall attend the police station no every Wednesday and Saturday between 7.00 a.m. and 8.00 p.m. and the Investigating Authority is directed to expedite the completion of investigation. 4. The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (A. R. JOSHI, J.)