hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 17 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2460 OF 1998 M/s. Inter Gold (I) Ltd. ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mrs. Nikita Badekha with Mr. M.M. Vaidya for Petitioner. Ms. I. Calcuttawala, A.G.P. For Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : APRIL 29, 2010 P. C.: Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. It is firstly contended that Section as quoted in Paragraph No. 4 of the Judgment was not the section relied upon. That itself has been noted in the latter part of the same paragraph. Considering the same, in our opinion, that challenge is not available. The second contention is in the matter of levying of penalty and interest. We have referred to the judgment of the Supreme Court in Devidas Krishen Pvt.Ltd. Versus State of Punjab (1992) 095 STC 0170. In the light of that, in so far as Review Application is concerned, no case made out for review. If the Petitioner has any other remedy, it is open to them to pursue that remedy. (D.G. KARNIK ,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)