IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-3546 of 2010 (O & M) Date of Decision: August 03, 2011 Sandeep Kaur .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Ms. Jatinder Jit Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. M.S. Dhillon, Advocate, for respondent No.2. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed by petitioner, Sandeep Kaur, under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing FIR No.29 dated 6.2.2010 (Annexure P-5) under Sections 406, 498-A, 494, 120-B IPC, registered with Police Station, Sadar, Jalandhar and consequent proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on Crl. Misc. No. M-3546 of 2011 [2] instructions from Gurmail Singh, Assistant Sub Inspector, states that investigation in the case has been concluded. Incriminating material only against the husband (Iqbal Singh) has been found who shall be challaned. The petitioner is not being challaned and therefore, the petitioner has no cause of action to file this petition for quashing. 3. In view of the statement made on behalf of the respondent-State, this petition is disposed of infructuous. It goes without saying that the complainant would have the right to file a protest petition, or at a later stage file an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. (AJAI LAMBA) August 03, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?