1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10547 OF 2009 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10558 OF 2009 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10562 OF 2009 Ramesh Appa Rao ...Petitioner (in all the petitions) vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ...Respondent (in all the petitions) Mr.R.A.Thorat for the petitioner Mr.R.D.Dhanuka a/w Mr.M.M.Malvankar for respondent-BMC CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : MARCH 8, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. It is not in dispute that the final arguments in the suit have been already heard. Considering this fact, no case is made out for interference in writ jurisdiction at this stage. 2 The order impugned is purely of interlocutory nature which is capable of being challenged in the Appeal which may be preferred by the petitioner against the decree passed in the suit if the same be adverse to the petitioner. 3 Subject to what is observed above, Writ Petitions are rejected. 4 The trial Court will proceed to decide the suit as expeditiously as possible and preferably within eight weeks from today. JUDGE