,’k ,r\v,r,k>‘ , , r \ ;@E aaGa mum a? $§§§£§$§§§E§i C2 g: ®i$GARH wz?E‘§::mN 53:6.“ j 94 gagwa Div§siersa§ Fares: Office'f, Khah'agafh, Tami} Kmiragarh, District Raj'natwdgaan (Chhattiaagayh) PgTEmNER Vevsus §E$PQND§NT$ ramsicjing Gfficer, Labam Court Rajnandgaon (Ci’Iha‘itEgarh) i E C.i-,5E..22%:{221QE ‘F‘ €3 ‘ by WLRLEEEET§§§E§§§ §N§ / %ifr, Moharda$ Kuideeg, S/o Sukhdas, residentof Wam Mar! 4; Dan€e$hwari Para??? - Adarsh Qhawk, Dchgargérh, D§$trict Rajnangacn (Chhat‘ti§gafh§ “ d 3 > E C§E i HEGH SQURT CDF (:HH $€3§ARH £33?“ BILA§§wF€ (Han. Mr. Justica Fritinker mwaker) W‘Fé. N0. 7‘35 9f 2(302 EWQEQ‘iianer Divisional Forest Officer & amthsi‘ VERSUS EMQm‘ndRme Mahardas Kuideep 8:. anather Preggri‘: Shri P. DaS, Dy. Gdga. cmmsel peiitioners/State. .9? S§ ri Pankaj Agrawal, comma! fm’thé y'eSpwdeiwt N91. 3" gRgééia gauwm‘ vi} The pre$ent petition has been filed by the State against the immgned award dated 27.0?2001 vide Annexure FM passed. bv F’re3iding Officer. Labour {mum DiStt. Rajnamgaon ((3 a} in case No.25liil ActRef/QE whereby the Labour Cgurt has: directec? for reémtatement of Mohardas Kuldeep on the past cf Godawn Keepar with 7% ”/o of back wage3 2A Learned caumei fer appearing fer respendent N0.1 $ubmi€s that subsequent to fiiing 0f this raetitmn, Mohardas Kuideep has aireaciv beem regularized as Peon an 0&092‘30 . {Annexure FM}. 3. On instructianrs, learned counsel for respendent Nefg submirs that respcndent No.1 will net have any claim for back wages in future aleor iii in View of abeve, awarding to the counsei far the parties. nething survives in thie petition for adjudication. Sdl- ThuS! the petiticn i3 accordingly dieposed Qf. 0t i Pfitinker Diwaker Judge Priya K ‘