THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.2942 of 2011 ORDER: The respondents filed O.S.No.59 of 2007 in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Parchur, against the petitioner, for the relief of perpetual injunction, in respect of the suit schedule property. The petitioner filed written statement and the suit is pending trial. The respondents filed I.A.No.778 of 2009 under Order VI Rule 17 C.P.C., with a prayer to permit them to amend the plaint to incorporate the plea of partition and the particulars thereof. The application was opposed by the petitioner. The trial Court allowed the I.A., through order dated 27.06.2011. The same is challenged in this revision. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The respondents did not intend to alter the nature of the suit, through proposed amendment, much less any cause of action, which was barred by limitation, was sought to be incorporated. It is in the process of supplementing the facts that they wanted to amend the plaint to incorporate the particulars relating to partition between themselves and the petitioner. Mere addition of particulars is not going to alter the nature of the suit. Though the title of the parties to the suit schedule property cannot be decided in a suit for perpetual injunction, the Court has to be informed as to the nature of rights, claimed by the respondents, over the property. The trial Court has discussed the matter from the correct perspective and has arrived at proper conclusion. No interference is warranted in the order under revision. The C.R.P. is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dated: 29.07.2011 GJ