IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18032 of 2008 NAVIN PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 9.7.2008. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. In the First Information Report it is said that this petitioner alongwith Pramod Sahni, Heera Paswan and one Dilip Paswan came to the house of the informant and took away her son. It is also alleged that these persons are responsible for causing death of the deceased and particularly the name of the petitioner has been described in the First information Report. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the occurrence took place in the village and none of the villagers have supported the fact that this petitioner was one of the persons who fired on the deceased. The petitioner is an accused atleast in 12 cases and he has remained in custody since 25.6.2007. Considering the fact aforesaid, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The bail application of the petitioner is rejected. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)