IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8540 of 2007 Narendra Kumar Ambastha, S/o Late Ambika Prasad, Aged about 62 years, Resident of Village – Pachaukhar, P.O. - Pachaukhar, P.S.-Deo, District- Aurangabad. ........ Petitioner Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board through its Secretary, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. Financial Controller-I, Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna. 3. Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Aurangabad. ......... Respondents ----------- 2 24.06.2011 Heard Sri Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vinay Kirti Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the respondents/Bihar State Electricity Board. The present writ petition was filed in the year 2007 with a prayer to direct the respondents to pay retiral dues. At the time of hearing, Sri Vinay Kirti Singh, learned counsel for respondents, on instruction submits, that during the pendency of the writ petition all the retiral dues have already been cleared. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the statement made on behalf of the Electricity Board. In view of the facts and circumstances, the court is of the opinion 2 that there is no need to further keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of. However, while disposing of the writ petition, it is desirable to observe, that if some of the grievances of the petitioner are still pending, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file representation before respondent no. 2/Financial Controller-I, Bihar State Electricity Board. If such representation is filed, it is expected, that respondent no. 2 will examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. The writ petition stands disposed of. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)