IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 26TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 7TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 6392 of 2009(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- LOKANATHAN, S/O.ANAKAMUTHU CHETTIAR ATTAYAMPATHY, CHITTUR TALUK,PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR (R.R.), CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. DAIVANA,W/O.RAJ CHETTIAR DAIVANA FIBRE MILL, PARAKKAL CHALLA, NEAR MEENKARA PAPER MILL, CHITTUR TALUK PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARAIT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.BEJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.2.2009, THE COURT ON 26/02/2009 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M. JOSEPH, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 6392 OF 2009 T ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 26th day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader. 2. Petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 revision before the government against Ext.P1 order of the Land Revenue Commissioner. This court had directed to keep all recovery proceedings in abeyance. Though the petitioner approached the 3rd respondent for early hearing of the matter, the same could not be done on account of the pre- occupation of the 3rd respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already filed an application for stay. In such circumstances, writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to consider and take a decision on the stay petition filed in Ext.P2 revision within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Recovery proceedings will be kept in abeyance till a decision is taken as aforesaid. This is on condition that the petitioner keeps the bank guarantee alive till the disposal of the revision. Sd/- (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) aks