IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 252 of 2004 (M/B) Mohamd Irshad S/o Ashfaq Hussain, R/o 25 Lakhi Bagh-I, Dehradun. …….. .. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Secretary, Transport, Secretariat, Dehradun. 2. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Dehradun. 3. Superintendent of Police, Traffic, Dehradun. ……….. Respondents Mr. Bipin Mohan Pingal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for the respondents. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon. Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Bipin Mohan Pingal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. Mr. Bipin Mohan Pingal, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition, now, has become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 04.05.2006 04.05.2006 G