IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18185 of 2010 1. BAIDYANATH YADAV @ BAIJU YADAV @ BAIJNATH YADAV 2. Ramesh Kumar Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The body of the deceased daughter-in- law in a case under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Penal Code has been recovered abandoned from the river side. This Court is not persuaded to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to petitioner no. 2. The application is rejected with regard to him. Considering the advanced age of the father-in-law stated to be 80 years in the petition, no specific overt act attributed to him, let petitioner no. 1 namely Baidyanath Yadav @ Baiju Yadav @ Baijnath Yadav surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Purnea in connection with 2 Banmankhi P.S. Case No. 207 of 2000, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha,J.)