- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1288 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.1288 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.1288 OF 2008 Dayaram Brijballam Maurya ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.M.P.Mishra i/b M/s.M.P.Mishra & Co. for the Applicant Mr.S.S.Pednekar, A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C.DAGA,J. V.C.DAGA,J. V.C.DAGA,J. DATE DATE DATE : APRIL 23,2008 : APRIL 23,2008 : APRIL 23,2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P. During the course of hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant brought to my notice that the impugned order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay dated 17th April 2008 is passed without recording reasons. He therefore, submits that by consent, the impugned order be set aside with a direction to the trial court to decide the application afresh by passing a reasoned order by following the principles of natural justice. 2. In view of this, impugned order is set aside without recording reasons and the matter is remanded back with a direction to decide the same afresh within a period of 15 days by a reasoned order following principles of natural justice. 3. Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. - 2 - JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE