IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1878 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1878 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1878 OF 2006 Municipal Corporation of ... Applicant Greater Mumbai Vs. Jitendra Vijaykumar Agarwal ... Respondents & Anr. Mr. A.N. Pathan i/by S.H. Ujjainwala for the Applicant. Mr. R.T. Padwal for Respondent No.1. Mr. Rajesh More, APP for State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J : R.S. MOHITE, J : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE DATE DATE : 17TH JULY, 2008 : 17TH JULY, 2008 : 17TH JULY, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. :- :- :- 1. This is an application for leave to file Appeal. 2. Accused are acquitted for the offence under Section 351 read with Section 475(A)(1)(b) of the M.M.C. Act. 3. On reading of the impugned judgment and order, I find that cogent reasons are given for acquittal of the accused. It is held by the learned Magistrate that there is no proof of service of the reasoned order upon the accused. 2 The sanction plan is not on record. In this view of the matter, leave is refused. Consequently Appeal papers to be filed. ( R.S. MOHITE, J.) R.S. MOHITE, J.) R.S. MOHITE, J.)