IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 179 of 2010. Decided on: March 18, 2010 Mamta Rani. ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Addl. AG. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of transfer. According to the petitioner, the impugned transfer has been made only to accommodate the 4th respondent, who is there for more than 19 years. In the reply, the transfer is defended on the ground that the same is made on medical ground. The petitioner has also several contentions and grounds. Having regard the rival submissions made before us we are of the view that the matter shall be considered afresh by the second respondent. Therefore, we disposed of the writ petition as follows: 2 There will be a direction to the second respondent to consider the matter afresh with notice to the petitioner and the 4th respondent and pass appropriate orders, adverting to the contentions taken by the parties. This shall be done on or before 15th April, 2010. Interim order passed by this Court will continue till such time. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 18, 2010 (Justice R.B. Misra), (rks) Judge.