1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2102 OF 2010 (Smt. Vatsala M. Patil vs. Shri Shrikishan R. Vyas & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. APRIL 30, 2010. Heard Shri Gour, learned counsel for the petitioner. Earlier this Court has granted liberty to file fresh petition, while considering earlier challenge. Hence, I have examined the controversy on merits. The petitioner – plaintiff wanted to lead secondary evidence and hence has moved an application on which impugned order has been passed on 10.09.2009. However, record shows that similar application moved earlier vide Exh. 66 has been rejected on 15.01.2008. That order has attained finality. In the circumstances, cognizance of challenge to impugned order cannot be taken in present writ petition. Writ Petition is, therefore, rejected. No order as to costs. 2 JUDGE *GS.