1 CR.APL NOS. 1127/2011, 1395/2011, 1318/2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904. APPLN/1127/2011 MOHAN AMRATRAO AATULE AND [Criminal] ORS V/S THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR WITH APPLN/1395/2011 MOHAN AMRATRAO AATULE AND ORS V/S THE STATE OF MAHARASH TRA AND ANR In APPLN/1127/2011 WITH APPLN/1318/2011 KISHOR BHIKAJI HARE V/S THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS In APPLN/1127/2011 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.S.S.Choudhari, Smt. Sadhana S.Jadhav, Advocates for respective applicants. Mr.K.M.Suryavanshi, APP for State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:26/4/2011 1. Heard. Smt.Jadhav appears for the complainant in application No. 1318/2011, seeking to assist learned A.P.P. Permitted. Criminal Application (No.1318/2011) disposed of. 2. By application (No.1395/2011) Mr.Choudhari has requested to allow to tender additional set of documents, 2 CR.APL NOS. 1127/2011, 1395/2011, 1318/2011 rather affidavits, permitted, copy already received by learned A.P.P. Application No.1395/2011 allowed. 3. Heard Mr.S.S.Choudhari in Criminal Application No.1127/2011, finally. 4. The long drawn controversy of civil litigation between the parties allegedly made Bhikaji Hare to commit suicide on 1st March, 2011. FIR of Kishor informs that his father left behind a chit stating that the accused/applicants to be the persons responsible to nag and instigate him to commit suicide as the controversy could not be resolved in respect of the land Gat No.69 or the access therein. 5. Mr.Choudhari submits that the very chit itself is doubtful as to its authorship. 6. Without adverting to the authorship of the chit, the factual matrix revolves that the parties are litigating since long, supported with the proceedings annexed with the present petition, in RCS No.20/2010 and 3 CR.APL NOS. 1127/2011, 1395/2011, 1318/2011 orders therein. 7. Custodial interrogation for that purpose of the accused/applicants, some of whom are in service and some are agriculturists, is not imperative. Care can be taken to protect interests of the complainant from threat perception. 8. The earlier interim protection dt. 17th March, 2011, is made absolute with attendance condition which shall remain in force till 31st July, 2011. The accused/applicants shall desist from contacting the witnesses concerned or the complainant and shall not pressurize them. Application allowed in above terms. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/1127-11craplgr