1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application No.78 of 2010 [State of Mah. Vs. Santosh D. Manmode & another] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mrs. K.S. Joshi, APP for the appellant. Mr. M.I. Dhatrak, Adv., for respondent no.1. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 23rd April, 2010. 1. Heard learned APP Mrs. K.S. Joshi for the appellant-State and learned Adv. Mr. M.I. Dhatrak for the respondent no.1. Perused the impugned judgment. 2. It is seen that the judgment of acquittal is based on the finding recorded in Para 24 thereof. 3. It is found that Panch of raid himself admits that after payment of alleged bribe money to the accused, the complainant demanded from the accused the receipt for payment of land revenue. 3. The said admission of Panch witness corroborates the defence of the accused, which 2 was suggested in the cross-examination. 4. Impugned Judgment is, thus, seen to be based on sound reasons and on due appreciation of evidence. 5. No interference is called for. 6. Application and Appeal are, therefore, rejected. Judge |Hedau|