1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.9012/2005. Govind Ram Garg Vs. Rajasthan Financial Corporation & Ors. WITH S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.9006/2005. Anand Bardwa Vs. Rajasthan Financial Corporation & Ors. WITH S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.9008/2005. P.R.Chotia Vs. Rajasthan Financial Corporation & Ors. Date of Order : : 22.9.2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr.Suresh Charan for the petitioners. Mr.Virendra Lodha ] Mr.Prahlad Singh for the respondents. These writ petitions seek to challenge show cause notices intending to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the petitioners and the orders of their suspension as also the orders by which the allotment of plots was cancelled which thus allegedly secured by filing false affidavits. Both, the cancellation of allotment of plot and the disciplinary proceedings and suspension order were joined into these writ petitions to be challenged together. 2 Learned counsel for the respondents produced for perusal of this Court the final orders, which have now been passed by the disciplinary authority on 27.8.2008. These orders indicate that the petitioner Govind Ram has been awarded penalty of stoppage of one grade increment, the petitioner Anand Bardwa has been awarded penalty of censure and petitioner P.R.Chotia, who has since retired, has been awarded penalty of fine. Learned counsel for the petitioners on the last date of hearing prayed for time to seek instructions from his clients and today again he prays for time to do so. Learned counsels for the respondents submit that the impugned show cause notices and the suspension orders have now merged into the final order which have been passed by the disciplinary authority inasmuch as the petitions sufferes from mis-joinder of causes of action because cancellation of plot is a separate cause of action which cannot be clubbed with the disciplinary matter. Upon consideration of the arguments, I find substance in the submission that the orders which are impugned herein except the cancellation of allotment of plot, have now merged into the final orders passed by the Disciplinary Authority which are now required to be 3 separately challenged, if so advised. The writ petitions are, therefore, disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to separately challenge the orders of penalty as also separately challenge the orders of cancellation of plots. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/- Item No.5 to 7.