IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 879 OF 2006 Harish G. Amin ... Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondent Mr. R.V. Thorat with Mr. Ashok Mishra for the petitioner. Ms. Geeta Shastri, AGP for respondent Nos. 1, 3 to 6. Ms. Trupti Puranik for respondent No.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, : F.I. REBELLO, : F.I. REBELLO, ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 18th April, 2006 : 18th April, 2006 : 18th April, 2006 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. It is case of the petitioner that though he has applied for trade licence, respondent No. 2 has not disposed of the same. Our attention is invited to page No. 37 of the petition. This is an application dated 18/02/2003. 3. Considering the controversy, the petition can be disposed of by issuing the following directions. (i) The petitioner to apply afresh for trade licence within two weeks from today. On such ( 2 ) application being made, respondent No. 2 to dispose of the same within eight weeks thereafter. 4. Rule made absolute with no order as to costs. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]