IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.613 OF 2004 OF MOTION NO.613 OF 2004 OF MOTION NO.613 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2249 of 2004 PETITION NO.2249 of 2004 PETITION NO.2249 of 2004 Mr. Jerome Rudolf Baptista......Petitioner Vs. 1.Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika & Ors..Respondents Mr. S.K. Sthalekar, for the Petitioner Mrs. N.V. Sanglikar, for Respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 18th March, 2005 : 18th March, 2005 : 18th March, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The petition was dismissed. The petitioner had made a statement to the Court on 27th August, 2994 that the unauthorised construction will be removed and in these circumstances time was granted. The Motion is taken out in October, 2004 to direct the Respondent No.1 to consider the application for license. Considering the earlier order we are not inclined to grant any relief. Hence Motion rejected. 2. It will be open to the petitioner if in law he has any right to submit the plans which will be considered accordingly by the Corporation. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (S.P. (S.P. (S.P. KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.)