@ J §a€§t¥aney years Rio V i e Dewari, Tahaii and I r‘\ esgaadem mwr‘ €29 R: ' CHHA?Ti$GA§§-§ Ki" B§L£$§3R Lm‘wPnNajE 6f 2%€’§ “‘shish‘ &ai3wai 'fz‘: m'nu ‘%o Karmai‘y‘a @ Mu n Ja‘svua! A.” 21 Mr inaiga .kcg; ‘v’afSLlc’ Qiate af Cx . attisgarh ;hrough msmct fwusératy ?”*ga$h Tahsii am! Districx a‘garn W.a., (?e€é‘tmn under Seciian 482 af ’me Gr.P.C$.) {$$: Hon’bEe ML 12?. fai'mrma, UR} §3re$ent~ MLAnumeh Shrivastava, counsei far the petitioner. Mr‘Suméet Jhanwar, Panei Lawyer far the State. , QR§EQ g§R ' seé an 1""‘ Feimaa y, 2 ‘m ‘ A. By this pe‘tiiian under Se tien 482 of the Cr.P.C., the petiirener has cheiienged iegeiity and erepriety cf ihe erder dated 27.1 1 .2 “.5 passed by the Sessions Judge, Raigarh ‘rn Criminei Revieien No.139lm affirming the order dared 2&102ma passed b" the Chref Ju Ma: a'ragrstrere Reagan vnereey apehcator‘ rsr intern ""smey or campy er and gens e: tue cemeuter nae seen Genreu‘ K § have near iearned ceunser ror me parses, per'sed me erder rmougned and other decuments fried en be‘neir or tne netmener. Learned ceunsei fer the ,eetitiener eubmi‘rs that as per maieriaé ceiieeted en eeheif af the prosecutien eiher accused have cemmiiteci theft cf cemputer rrem vii3age Seepat and have sore ine same ‘m the present petihoner end the present petttw. er has puruhesed the cumpu r and tts part new: the atereseid hereons. After :nveenganng the offence nves'getrng agenc" has not ante to trace he owner or the proper? Thereafter, :nv srrgettng agency has fretd uompieint {isiagase} for the effence punishehie under Section 45:3 of the LPG. Learned counsei rurther submits that the present petmoner oeak‘ ‘r'th compuisr ans after assemhiee‘ ihe computer he used te seii the same He has submiiiee‘ @ rewts ieataw purchase o orrpu r esprcgav" LCE} which ie§is the numscr of km) seize“ in me vesant case e . me ausenwe 0f raper care anu u cvmpwe. aper ;ea o. Lawnmogy :5 m; used pmyeriy, than same web c no use after someiime. Learned munsei aisa subm&5 that apyawtmn of the get§€ianer far inte¥im cusisdy has been iiicgaw dwaed by the Ceurts beiew. 0n me other hand lea w State counsei appeee" me pantie“ ana 3> subm; s thai the present pewtioner .s ore of tne accdsea an ‘hc same trial and iherefm'e, interim custody of the afcreseid articies weuid noi be just and prceer *0 he p itienern As per cepies 0 eyewerte fneu er beha c‘ the pet toner, espectatty eurchase of ane LCE snowing its number, tiiing at ccmpiatnt for the tfence punishebte under Sectten 4S3 at the i. V after due in eetigee . tnc tact that ether ce-accueed has die tased the fact that from Where they have eurchesed the ccmputer and eutai e. .ntenm cueteuy te the eereeh rem whom poseeesieh and artieiee here been ee ed re net prey Cehseqwht , the petrhm ts anoweu tt the petitioner turntehee eehieht ' {J‘J _2,. 0‘1 eurdt with bend of ”etaS‘wLV— tc the eattet’actteh ef the Chief Judiciat Magistrate Ft tgerh, .he arttcres se ed be given interim custcdy te the petitioner. ) ‘. Sdl- T.P. Sharma Judge