IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3999 of 2009 VIJAY KUMAR . Versus THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPN.& ORS . ----------- 2/ 27/01/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Patna Municipal Corporation. The writ petition was filed on 31.3.2009 after serving copies of the petition on the counsel for the Corporation. No counter affidavit has been filed. Today at this belated stage a prayer is made for an adjournment to file counter affidavit. The Court is not inclined to grant adjournment. The grievance of the petitioner is for demolition of structure allegedly illegally constructed by respondent Nos. 4 to 6 on plot No.1174. The allegations are of encroachment and construction without a sanctioned plan and also blocking the passage of another residential plot. There has been a vigilance case. It is the contention of the petitioner that final orders have been passed in the vigilance case. He has represented on 18.1.2008 for implementing the order and yet nothing was being done. If what the petitioner contends is correct, it is indeed a very serious matter. If the orders passed in the vigilance case have attained finality and have not been - 2 - questioned before a superior forum and/or have not been varied, modified or set aside, the orders are required to be implemented and had not been passed for being tied up in the file and to be locked up in the Almirah. Let the Patna Municipal Corporation dispose the petitioner’s representation dated 28.1.2008 by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/presentation of a copy of this order. Needless to state that if the respondents find justification in the claim or in any part of the claim, they are expected to act in accordance with law simultaneously. The writ application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)