SBCWP NO.2579/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2579/2010. Satish Kumar Gupta Vs. Jaipur Development Authority Date of Order:- April 21, 2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Ashok Kumar Bansal for petitioner. ***** BY THE COURT:- Contention of the learned counsel for petitioner is that petitioner was initially placed under suspension vide order dated 2/2/2005 on the ground of challan filed against him on 7/1/2005 however, that suspension order was revoked vide order dated 16/3/2005. Another employee, who was suspended approached this Court and raised grievance that he has been discriminated against and therefore respondents to contest such plea, again placed the petitioner under suspension on 10/5/2007. It is contended that in the internal enquiry held by the Deputy Commissioner JDA, charge against the petitioner was not found to be substantiated. In any case, petitioner remained under suspension even from the date of last order of suspension SBCWP NO.2579/10. 2 for three years. Having regard to the facts of the case aforenoticed, I require the petitioner to make a suitable representation to the Commissioner JDA, who shall in his discretion pass appropriate order and decide the representation within a reasonable time. With the observations made above, writ petition stands disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ) J. anil