IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2011 / 1ST ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 25315 of 2011(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER : ------------ SREENIMON, S/O. PURUSHOTHAMAN, SREENI BHAVANAM, ERUMAKKUZHY, NOORANADU P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THRIKKUNNAPPUZHA POLICE STATION, THRIKKUNNAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 690515. 2. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, CHENGANNUR, PIN - 689 121. 3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 001. R1 TO R3 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 25315 of 2011(L) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE GOODS CARRIAGE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY RELATING TO VEHICLE NO. KL-31C-2665. EXT.P2 : COPY OF PERMIT ISSUED BY THE TAHSILDAR, KOZHENCHERRY ON 15.09.2011 PERMITTING REMOVAL AND TRANSPORTATION OF LOOSE EARTH. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE SEIZURE MAHAZAR PREPARED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EVIDENCING SEIZURE OF THE VEHICLE MENTIONED IN EXHIBIT P1. EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 17.09.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P5 : COPY OF THE JUDGMENT MADE IN WP(C) NO. 21458/2011 DATED 17.08.2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn ANTONY DOMINIC, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No. 25315 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of September , 2011. JUDGMENT Grievance of the petitioner is that his vehicle bearing registration No. KL-31C-2665 was seized by the first respondent while transporting red earth on the allegation of violation of the provisions of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. It is stated that though the vehicle was seized on 17.9.2011, the vehicle has not been produced before the jurisdiction of Magistrate so far. It is with this complaint the writ petition is filed. In the nature of the allegations, the only order required is that on the production of a copy of this judgment the first respondent will ensure that the vehicle is produced before the Magistrate concerned forthwith. Petitioner to produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE rkc //True copy// PA to Judge