IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.112 OF 2003 Er.Karpurapu Vara Prasada Rao ...Petitioner Versus Mr.P.N.Radkar ...Respondent ...... None for Petitioner. Mr.Girish Kulkarni for Respondent. ...... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH MARCH MARCH 29, 2006. 29, 2006. 29, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Office note indicates that as Petitioner is appearing in-person, notice was sent to the Petitioner but that is returned with endorsement ‘not found at the given address’. No further steps can be taken by the Office. 2. Besides, Counsel for the Respondent points out that the main matter before the Central Administrative Tribunal has been dismissed and nothing would survive for consideration in the present Petition. : 2 : 3. Be that as it may, as Petitioner is not appearing nor can be served by the Registry, the Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.