// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2342/2007 Roshan Lal S/o Kashiram and Others Versus Additional District Judge No.2, Alwar and Another Date of Order ::: 05.08.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Manish Gupta, Counsel for petitioners #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Plaintiff-respondent No.2 filed a suit for permanent injunction along-with an application for temporary injunction, which was allowed by the trial court vide order dated 5th July, 2002. Being aggrieved with the same, an appeal was preferred on behalf of the defendants but without success, hence this writ petition on their behalf. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and also the reasons assigned by both the courts below in the impugned orders whereby the temporary injunction has been granted in favour of the plaintiff and, after considering the same, I // 2 // find that there is concurrent finding by both the courts below about prima-facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant, which cannot be interfered with by this Court in writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//