Crl. Misc. No. M-10137 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-10137 of 2011 Date of Decision : July 22, 2011 Ajay Dua and another .... Petitioners Vs. Pinki @ Anjali .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Ms. Indu Bala, Advocate for Mr. N. D. Achint, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Pinki @ Anjali – respondent herein has filed complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 against Ajay Dua and his mother Usha Dua – petitioner herein. Petitioners herein moved application Annexure P-3 for amendment of the written statement filed in the said case. Learned Magistrate, vide impugned order dated 14.02.2011 (Annexure P-1), has allowed the said application. In spite thereof, the petitioners have approached this Court by way of instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short – Cr.P.C.) for quashing order Annexure P-1 and for directing the learned Crl. Misc. No. M-10137 of 2011 2 Magistrate to investigate the allegation of fabrication in the original paper- book/complaint filed by the respondent herein. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the case file. It is alleged that in the original complaint `Gurnoor through her mother' has been added later on by fabrication. However, no such plea has been taken in the amendment application (Annexure P-3) moved by the petitioners herein, nor any such prayer was made before the Magistrate for investigating the allegation of fabrication. It is thus apparent that the instant petition is completely misconceived. The petition is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to move the Magistrate for appropriate relief in accordance with law. July 22, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE