IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH JANUARY 2008 / 20TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 1287 of 2008(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SALINI GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI, SARNYA HOUSE, CHOOLATHERUVU, MUTHUKULAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA, PIN-690506. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI SRI.T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, KERALA STATE OFFICE, PANAMPILLY AVENUE, PANAMPILLY NAGAR P.O., KOCHI-682036. 2. THE CHIEF DIVISIONAL RETAIL SALES MANAGER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD., COCHIN DIVISONAL OFFICE, PANAMPILLY AVENUE, PANAMPILLY NAGAR P.O., COCHIN-682036. 3. SHRI. S.KESAVA PILLAI, 'POURNAMI', ILLIPPAKULAM P.O., VIA. PALLIKKAL, ALAPPUZHA-690503. BY ADV.SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ======================= W.P.(C) No. 1287 of 2008(C) ======================= Dated this the 10th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner was an applicant for Kissan Seva Kendra (Retail Outlet) dealership for which the 1st respondent had invited applications. Petitioner's grievance in this writ petition is that, although the petitioner is eligible for award of the dealership, the 3rd respondent has been preferred to the petitioner. Petitioner submits that this is because of the discrepancy in awarding of marks during interview. According to the petitioner, she has got the right to file the petitioner against the award for marks and she has filed Ext.P5 objection in this regard to the 2nd respondent. Petitioner now seeks direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P5 expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned standing counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the 2nd respondent-Deputy General of 1st W.P.(C) No. 1287/2008/C -2- respondent, Cochin to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P5, as expeditiously as possible,at any rate, within one months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the 3rd respondent. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE jp