ssp 1 WP 1749 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1749 OF 2011 Diler Singh Trilok Singh Ajmani .....Petitioner versus The Regional Transport Authority and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.V.R.Tripathi i/by V.R.Tripathi and Associates, for the petitioner. Mr.D.A.Nalawade, Govt. Pleader, for the respondents. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATE: 27 th SEPTEMBER, 2011 P.C. 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Regional Transport Authority has permitted the transfer of the permit of the vehicle in respect of which there is a Hire Purchase Agreement entered into by the petitioner with the respondent No.3. The said permit has been transferred to another vehicle. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would like to make representation to the Regional Transport Authorities pointing out that since the petitioner is a financier, it was not open to the authority to transfer the permit on another vehicle, as according to him, it is not open to transfer the same in view of the provisions of Section 51 of the Motor Vehicle Act. 2. Since the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the ssp 2 WP 1749 of 2011 petitioner would like to make representation with the Regional Transport Authorities, we permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition. If such a representation is made, the same may be decided in accordance with law. Needless to say that while deciding the representation, the decision of this Court dated 16-04-2009 in Writ Petition No.2237 of 2008 would be taken into consideration by the Regional Transport Officer. In the representation, the original permit holder may be joined as a party so that the authority can hear him. The Regional Transport Officer, Wadala, is directed to decide the representation within a period of three months from the receipt of the same from the petitioner. 3. In view of what is stated above, writ petition is disposed of. ( R.M.SAVANT, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )