IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16851 of 2011 Lalasa Dubey & Anr Versus Ranjan Kumar Tiwary & Ors ---------------------------------- 03. 30.09.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The only grievance of the petitioner is that in view of the direction of this Court, the probate case was not registered as title suit, although the same is conscientious matter. From perusal of the impugned order dated 30.07.2011 passed by 7th A.D.J., Motihari in probate case No.36 of 2008, it appears that the learned Court below noticed the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. It appears that the record was sent by the Sub Judge to the District Judge finding the same to be conscientious matter and there after District Judge sent the record to the present Court for its disposal. However, it appears that number of title suit has not been given in the cause title of the probate case. In my opinion, it is only a procedural method and purely within the administration of the District Judge. The petitioner has got no role to play in this matter and he cannot claim as a matter of right the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. If in fact the same has not been registered as title suit, the Court concerned may get it registered. With the above observation, this writ application is, therefore, dismissed. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)