1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3696 OF 2011 (Barkat Ali Akbar Ali Mardani vs. Jantaseva Mirchi Masal Industries) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri V.R. Choudhari, Advocate for the petitioner. ------- CORAM : R.M. SAVANT, J. DATED : AUGUST 3, 2011 The above petition takes exception to the order dated 15/3/2011 passed by the 2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division (Ad hoc), Buldana whereby the Application filed by the petitioner, who is the defendant in Special Civil Suit No. 35/2002 and who has filed a counter claim in the said suit, for production of documents by taking recourse to Order XI Rule 18 of the Code of Civil Procedure came to be rejected. The petitioner, who is a defendant in the said suit, had issued a notice to the plaintiff to 2 produce the documents. Upon receipt of the said notice, the plaintiff has denied existence of such documents and their relevancy. The trial Court in the said circumstances, deemed it fit to reject the said Application as the plaintiff had denied the existence of the documents and that they were not relevant. The reasons given by the trial Court for rejecting the said Application in the context of Order XI Rule 18 of the Code of Civil Procedure are unexceptional and do not merit interference in the writ jurisdiction of this Court. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE khj