In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CWP No. 2464 of 2007 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.3.2008 Santosh Devi ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Anil Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashish Kapoor, Addl.A.G.Haryana. **** JUDGMENT SURYA KANT, J. Replication is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the parties. On 5.3.2008, the following order was passed by this Court:- “Learned State counsel has pointed out that the writ petition has been filed after pronouncement of award dated 14.10.2004 and that the present petition was filed on 8.2.2007. It is well settled that once the award has been announced, no writ can be entertained by this Court. In CWP No. 2464 of 2007 -2- support of the abovementioned view, we place reliance on judgments of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the cases of Star Wire (India) Ltd. v. State of Haryana (1996) 11 SCC 698, Municipal Council Ahmednagar v. Shah Hyder Beig (2000) 2 SCC 48, C.Padma v.Dy.Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu (1997) 2 SCC 627 and Swaika Properties Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Rajasthan JT 2008 (2) S.C.280.” We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, who is unable to dispute the fact that the award was actually pronounced on 14.10.2004, whereas the writ petition has been filed in the year 2007. In these circumstances, we do not find any merit in this writ petition. Dismissed. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE (SABINA) March 26, 2008 JUDGE anita