1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Criminal Writ Petition No.2992 of 2005 With Criminal Writ Petition No.2993 of 2005 Ejaz Ahmed Mohammed Ishaq Dharashirkar Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & anr. Respondents Mr.Suresl Shah for petitioner. Mr.V.S.Talkute for resp.no.2. Mr.D.R.More, APP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. October 26, 2007. P.C. . Both these petitions raise a common grievance viz. the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First class at Pandharpur rejecting the application at Exhibit 26 in STC No.1444 of 2005 and the application at Exhibit 23 in STC No.1935 of 2005. . Mr.Talkute, the learned counsel for the respondent - complainant has consented for allowing both the applications provided the trial of the complaints is expedited and they are decided within a fixed period. . Hence by consent the petitione are allowed and 2 the impugned common order dated 2/12/2005 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class at Pandharpur dated 2/12/2005 is hereby quashed and set aside and the application at Exhibit 26 in STC No.1444 of 2005 and the application at Exhibit 23 in STC No.1935 of 2005 are hereby allowed. The documents called for by the said applications be produced latest by 30th November 2007 and the trial of the complaints be completed as expeditiously as possible and preferably by 31st January 2008. Both the parties have given an undertaking to this Court that none of them will seek unwarranted adjournments before the trial Court. (B.H.MARL