IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8035 of 2011 Smt.Savita Malik Vs. Punjab National Bank, Sector 17, Chandigarh & others Present: Mr.Deepak Manchanda, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has an equal efficacious alternative remedy of filing an appeal against the order passed under Section 17 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. Her grievance that the petitioner is being fastened with the liability, for which her house was never put to charge, can very well be pleaded before the authorities under the Act. In view of the alternative remedy available to the petitioner, I am not inclined to invoke extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail her alternative remedy by filing an appeal. May 06, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE