IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU C.R.P.No.5062 of 2009 Date: 3rd November, 2009 Between: Pothuraju Ramaiah (died) per L.Rs. Pothuraju Seethamma &others. .. Petitioners And Pothuraju Masthanamma & others. .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU C.R.P.No.5062 of 2009 ORAL ORDER: Petitioners are defendants and respondents are plaintiffs. Respondents laid suit in O.S.No.86 of 2001 for partition of suit schedule properties. Now the present I.A. is filed for deleting Ex.A1 from ‘A’ series of the suit documents on the ground that the same is not permissible in evidence since it is a Xerox copy and not original. There is no necessity of going into all the details. Even while marking Ex.A1, initially the trial Court marked the same subject to objections and admissibility, if any in future. While that being so, petitioners filed the present I.A. seeking to delete Ex.A1 from ‘A’ series. I am of the opinion that the stage as to whether the document is admissible in evidence or not has not come up. It is always open for the petitioners to raise such objections as to admissibility of the document or any other tenable objections at an appropriate time. This is not the time for entertaining such application. Therefore, I am of the view that the trial Court has not committed any error calling for interference of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The C.R.P. is devoid of merits and liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the C.R.P. is dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 3.11.2009 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU C.R.P.No.5062 of 2009 3.11.2009