IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN FRIDAY, THE 6TH MAY 2011 / 16TH VAISAKHA 1933 WP(C).No. 13033 of 2011(D) -------------------------- PETITIONERS:- ------------------- 1. MATHEW JOSEPH,S/O.JOSEPH MATHEW, RESIDING AT CHUDUKATTIL HOUSE, VAZHAPPALLY P.O,CHANGANACHERRY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. JASMIMOL B,D/O.BASHEERKUTTY, RESIDING AT PUTHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, ELIPPAKULAM P.O, MAVELIKKARA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 3. ROSE MATHEW, D/O.MATHEW POTHEN RESIDING AT KANNIAKONIL HOUSE, NEAR S.B HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, CHANGANACHERRY P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 4. TEENA MARIA ABRAHAM,D/O.ABRAHAM GEORGE RESIDING AT ENCHAKKATTU HOUSE,MANARCAD P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 5. ANISHA SASIDHARAN,D/O.M.G.SASIDHARAN, RESIDING AT GOKULAM, P.C.KAVALA P.O, PAIPPAD, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.P.S.APPU RESPONDENTS:- --------------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR,KOTTAYAM-60. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,PRIYADARSHINI HILLS P.O, KOTTAYAM-60. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.T.A.SHAJI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.K.MOHANAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.13033 of 2011-D. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 6th May, 2011. J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioners is that though the petitioners have preferred applications for re-valuation of their answer scripts in the papers 'Mechanics of Solids'; 'Electrical Technology and in the Computer Programming'; 'Electronics Circuits-I and Computer Programming'; 'Computer Programming'; and 'Electronics Circuits-I' of the fourth semester B.Tech (Civil Engineering) Degree Course, the same has not been considered so far and no result is published. 2. Standing Counsel for the respondents submitted that if the application preferred by the petitioners are proper, the same can be directed to be disposed of within a reasonable time. 3. In the light of the above facts and circumstances involved in the case and in view of the submission made by WP(C).No.13033 of 2011-D. 2 the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to revalue the papers of the petitioners as requested by them as per Exts.P6, P7, P8 and P9, if the said applications are otherwise in order and publish the result within ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment which will be produced by the petitioners. The writ petition is disposed of as above. V.K.MOHANAN, (Judge) Kvs/-