CRM-M-27281-2011 [ 1 ] ::::::: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27281-2011 Date of decision:02.11.2011 Krishna Devi ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sagar Deswal, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This is a petition for grant of regular bail in a pending trial case registered vide FIR No.81 dated 28.04.2011, under Sections 302, 506, 34 of IPC at Police Station Radaur, District Yamuna Nagar. The FIR was registered on the statement of Ram Charan who had averred that Pardeep Kumar and Parveen Kumar had caused injuries to the deceased with iron rod, whereas the petitioner gave fist and slap blows to the deceased. The occurrence took place on 28.04.2011, whereas the deceased expired on 19.05.2011 after about 21 days of the injury. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the PMR, the cause of death was because of the blows on the abdomen with iron rod and on opening the stomach, abdominal cavity was found with puss and peritoneum was absent at places. He further submits that the Medical Officer has given his remark about the cause of death “due to injuries and its complications”. It is CRM-M-27281-2011 [ 2 ] ::::::: thus submitted that the deceased did not die because of the injury having been caused by the petitioner who has been attributed only slap and fist blows rather the death had accelerated due to the injuries caused in his abdomen with iron rod. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the deceased had recorded his statement on 13.05.2011 in which he had specifically named the petitioner. At the same time, he has also admitted that only slap and fist blows are attributed to the petitioner. The challan in this case has been presented and the prosecution evidence is in progress as out of 17 witnesses, 2 witnesses have already been examined. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case but without making any observation on the merits, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. November 02, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE