IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 7732 of 2009 Between: M.P. Bharath Singh, S/o. M.K. Pyare Singh, Plot No. 11, 12 & 23 Tummakunta Village, Shamirpet (M), Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Shamirpet Police Station, at Shamirpet, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Raiadurg, Ranga Reddy District. 3 Sai Teja Educational Society, Rep by its Secretary Cum Correspondent, Sri M. Indra Sena Reddy, S/o. M. Yadav Reddy, aged about 33 years, Occ : Lecturer, R/o. H.No. 8-101/P1, Golnaka, Alwal, Secunderabad - 500 015. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue appropriate writ, or order or direction mostly one which is in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in interfering with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent by calling the petitioner and his parents family members to the police station frequently and harassing them to settle the matter with the 3rd respondent as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjustified and unsustainable and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : O R D E R:- Questioning the action of the 1st respondent, namely the Station House Officer, in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent, and calling him and the members of his family to the police station frequently and harassing them to settle the matter with the unofficial respondent, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. The 1st respondent has filed counter affidavit denying the averments made by the petitioner in the writ affidavit and submitted that that as of now no complaint whatsoever is received or registered against the petitioner, and that he never summoned the petitioner and his old aged parents at any point of time, much less to settle the civil disputes between him and the unofficial respondent. The petitioner, only on an apprehension that the police may take action against him based on complaint, if any, that may be lodged against him, has filed the writ petition. In view of the specific denials made by the 1st respondent in his counter affidavit and having regard to the stand taken by him that he has not summoned the petitioner or his parents to the police station nor harassed them to settle the matter with the unofficial respondent, no orders need be passed in the writ petition, and the same is accordingly closed. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 28th April, 2009 bcj