» M , Q am ~m u“ m HEGH COURT 6F CHHATI'ISGARH: 3ILASPUR Wfit Petifion No. 5662 of 2G05 Manuai Pd. Shfivas‘ aued about 45 vears $lo LatebShri RD. Shrivas‘ R10. Paia‘sh, 93; Raj n§$hore Nagar, Déstt. Biiaspurv Vergug Re§§cngga1§s 1) The State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Ccoperative Department, Mantréiaya, D.K.S Bhawan} Raépw. 2} Registrar. Cooperative Department. Ramux (Writ etition under Articfe 2261927 of the Constitution ofJndia) SB: Hon’bie Mi. $a&ish K. Agnihotti, J. Present: Shri HE. Agrawat, Sr. Advocam with Shr§ Parag Kotesha, counsel for the petmonex Shri YS. Thakur, Deputy Advocate Genera; for ihe 8&ate. v $etii‘ionea’ GRAL 9RDER {Faesed on f“ day of July, 29m) By this petition, the petitioner chaiienges the vaiiditv of the transfer crder dated 24/16/2005 {Annexure Pm, whereby the petitioner werking as Cooperative inspector was transferred from Bitaspur tc Jashpur‘ 2) This ceurt on 8-‘E2—2GG5 staved the operation of the impugned order dated 24i’iOi2065 (Annexure 1.3/1) The petitioner continued for about 2 V2 veers on the same piaoe of posting. Even if the impugned transfer order were quashed,‘ t’ne State might have considered to o!ace the person at an appropriate place in oubiio interest, At this stage, it wiii not be just and proper to adiudicate upon the vaiidity of the impugneo‘ transfer order, since the petitioner has already worked for about 2 Vé years on the same piace of posting 3) it is weti settied principie of iaw that transfer is an irioident of service and it is tor the empioyer to decide asto whether a particuiar or’tioer/empioyee ‘oe posted keeping in View pubiic interest as weii as administrative exigehoy. This Court has iimited turisdiotion to interfere in the transfer matter and this Court oa’n interfere ohiy in the case of proved maia tide, non-competence of authority oassing the transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity with the roies and r'eguiations. The oetitioneriemoioyee cannot ’oe permitted to remain at one otace, forever‘ ’ov Court Omef$. , P ”z, 4) The State autharitigs are a? Iiberty ta pass an Order in regard tc the pasting of the petiticner, if so advised, in pubiic interest and on administrative exigency without insisting of compiiance of ihe impugned transfer order. u) a .. _ in View of foregoing, this petition is disposed of. Consequentiy, MWPNQ 4460fZUO5 aiso stands disposed of‘ Sd/— §auish IQ Agnihomi Judge