1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3961 of 2011. Ku.Yashshwini Madhukar Randive ..vs.. The State of Mah. through Secretary and others. =-=-==-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. Vishal Anand, Adv. for the petitioner. Mrs.T.D.Khade, AGP for respondent no.1. Mr. A.Y.Kapgate, Adv. for respondent nos.2 and 3. C ORAM : D.D.SINHA AND A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : 14th NOVEMBER, 2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondents. It is brought to the notice of this court that the petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Teacher from Halba Scheduled Tribe category. The learned counsel for the respondent – Management Shri Kapgate has submitted that since the petitioner did not submit the caste certificate as well as the documents in support thereof, the caste claim of the petitioner could not be referred to the Caste Scrutiny Committee and therefore, the impugned order of termination came to be issued on 15/11/2010 by the respondent. On the backdrop of the above referred fact, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the 2 present writ petition with liberty to approach the Management with the original caste certificate along with the relevant documents in support thereof for the purpose of sending it to the Caste Scrutiny Committee for necessary action. The learned counsel for the Management states that if the petitioner submits the original caste certificate and other documents, the said proposal would be forwarded to the Caste Scrutiny Committee for necessary action. In view of the above referred statement made by the respective counsel, no further order or direction in this writ petition is necessary. The same is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE. chute