1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 3327 OF 2009 Tarabai W/o Somnath Gadhave Versus The State of Maharashtra *** Mr. S. S. Thombre, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. K. M. Suryawanshi, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 7th OCTOBER, 2009. 1. Heard Mr. Thombre for the accused / applicant Tarabai. In the light of what the learned Judge has observed, the present challenge can well be dealt with pursuant to direction No.2 of the order dated 17th February, 2009 by learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Beed which reads as under: "II. Effect of this bail order would remain in force till her regular bail application decided by the competent trial Court in case charge sheet is submitted to the Court." 2. The learned Judge seized with the matter will 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. naturally abide by the above directions. Consequently, present application is disposed of. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:07/10/2009. ans/3327