IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16634 of 2010 MD.NASIA @ MD.NAUSHAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.05.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act is of not being arrested on the spot, no recovery and custody since 5.12.2009. Counsel for the State points out from the materials that he has been named by one apprehended on the spot along with recovery naming him as the supplier of illegal arms when he is acknowledged to have antecedents of approximately eight cases. Considering his antecedents and the nature of the allegations the Court is not persuaded at this stage to grant bail. This application is rejected at present. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)