IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 8871 of 2002 Between: D.N. Prasad s/o D. Venkata Ramaiah, Aged: about 52 years, Occup: Security Inspector, Central Institute of Tool Design (CITD for short), Balanagar, Hyderabad r/o D.No. 1-50/6, Sreeramnagar Colony, Kapra, Hyderabad – 500 062. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. Union of India rep., by Secretary to Government, Ministry of Industries, Central Secretariat, New Delhi. 2. The Chairman, Central Institute of Tool Design, South Wing, 7th Floor, Nirman Bhavan, new Delhi – 110 001. 3. The Principal Director, Central Institute of Tool Design, Balanagar, Hyderabad. 4. The Secretary, Central Institute of Tool Design, Balanagar, Hyderabad. 5. Sri K.V. Subrahmanyam, Secretary, Central Institute of Tool Design, Balanagar, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to allot the petitioner the duties and responsibilities of the post of Security Inspector as per the job chart issued on 17-03-1992 and set aside the office order dated 30-04-2002 issued by R.3 declaring the same as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and be pleased to pass such other and further order or orders as the Hon’ble High Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice, else the petitioner would be put to irreparable loss and damage. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.VEMURIVENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 4: Smt..N.HEMA RANGA REDDY, SC for CENTRAL GOVERNMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.5 – None-- The Court Made the Following : ORAL ORDER:- Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter dated 02-07-2004 to the effect that the petitioner intends to withdraw the writ petition. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. No costs. ___________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dt. 06-07-2004 Pvks/* To 1. The Secretary to Government, Union of India, Ministry of Industries, Central Secretariat, New Delhi. 2. The Chairman, Central Institute of Tool Design, South Wing, 7th Floor, Nirman Bhavan, new Delhi – 110 001. 3. The Principal Director, Central Institute of Tool Design, Balanagar, Hyderabad. 4. The Secretary, Central Institute of Tool Design, Balanagar, Hyderabad. 5. Sri K.V. Subrahmanyam, Secretary, Central Institute of Tool Design, Balanagar, Hyderabad. 6. 2CD copies