IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 25TH JULY 2008 / 3RD SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 22357 of 2008(J) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN EP 116/06 IN OS.27/2003 of SUB COURT, HOSDRUG .................... PETITIONER: ------------ A.BASKARAN NAIR S/O.MALINGU NAIR PAYATHICHAL, PERIA VILLAGE HOSDURG TALUK KASARAGOD. BY ADV. SRI.T.B.SHAJIMON RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. AYINGOORAN VEETTIL KALYANI AMMA W/O.LATE KOOKALKUNHIRAMAN NAIR 2. AYINGOORAN VEETIL NARAYANAN NAIR S/O.LATE KOOKALKUNHIRAMAN NAIR 3. AYINGOORAN VEETTIL MEENAKSHI AMMA D/O.LATE KOOKALKUNHIRAMAN NAIR 4. AYINGOORAN VEETTIL SUKUMARAN NAIR S/O.LATE KOOKALKUNHIRAMAN NAIR 5. AYINGOORAN VEETTILNALANI D/O.LATE KOOKALKUNHIRAMAN NAIR 6. AYINGOORAN VEETTILRADHAMANI D/O.LATE KOOKALKUNHIRAMAN NAIR ALL ARE R/A. NELIKUNNU, CHAKKITTADUKKAM BELUR VILLAGE OF HOUDURG TALUK ATTENGANAM POST, KASARAGOD. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J. =========================== W.P.(C) NO.22357 OF 2008 =========================== Dated this the 25th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT This petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging Ext.P7 order passed by the executing court in E.P.116/2006. The executing court had originally passed an order of arrest which was challenged by the petitioner before this court in W.P.(C)20181/2007. This court under Ext.P3 judgment set aside that order granting opportunity to the petitioner to adduce evidence provided he files a review petition within time. Though petitioner filed a review petition, he did not prosecute that petition as is evident from Ext.P7 order. In such circumstance, I do not find any necessity to grant further indulgence. Writ Petition is dismissed. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE tpl/- M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. --------------------- W.P.(C).NO. /06 --------------------- JUDGMENT SEPTEMBER,2006