-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2313 OF 2009 Dr. Hemant Pikale & Ors. ..Petitioners. Versus M.C.G.M. & Ors. ..Respondents. Mrs. Nirmala V. Sanglikar for the petitioners. Mrs. S. A. Module for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Coram : F.. I. REBELLO & R. V. MORE, JJ. Date : June 15, 2010. P. C. : 1. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The petitioner, in a town planning scheme, was allotted a final plot. That plot was not made available to the petitioner but some other plot was made available which would not result in the petitioner getting ownership of the plot, i.e., free hold land. The stand of the Corporation was that in the absence of State Government taking steps to amend the D.P. plan to bring the scheme in conformity with D.P. plan, it was not possible for them to act in the matter and they would take steps no sooner the Government issues notification. The State Government has now issued a notification dated 14th June 2010 to bring the scheme in conformity with the D.P. plan. The respondent Corporation will now have to take steps. In the light of that, the srp -: 2 :- following order. (1) Considering the long period for which the petitioner is waiting to be alloted a final plot and considering the power conferred on the Corporation, which is a town planning authority and considering the affidavit filed before this Court and paragraph 6, which statement is accepted. The entire exercise to be completed within six months from today. (2) We further make it clear that if the exercise is not completed within 6 months from today, the officers responsible would be saddled cost which are quantified at Rs. 1 lac which will be recovered from their salaries. (3) Rule made absolute accordingly. (R.V. MORE, J.) (F. I. REBELLO, J.)