IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.506 of 1989 (O&M) Date of decision: February 26, 2010. Joginder Singh (dead) through LRs & Anr. ...Appellant(s) v. Banta Singh ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri JPS Sandhu, Advocate, for the appellant(s) with Surinder Singh s/o Joginder Singh appellant. Shri J.S. Gill, Advocate, for the respondent. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): Vide Civil Misc. No.10277-C of 2006, an affidavit of Dharam Singh and Gurbaz Singh was placed before this Court wherein it was submitted that the parties to the suit have compromised. This Court vide order dated 15.11.2006 had sent the aforesaid affidavit to the District & Sessions Judge, Amritsar directing him to record the compromise and submit his report along with statements of the parties. As per the report submitted by the District & Sessions Judge, Amritsar, it was submitted that no compromise has been effected between the parties. Shri JPS Sandhu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants has submitted that the aforesaid report was submitted by the District & Sessions Judge, Amritsar on the objections raised by Surinder Singh s/o Joginder Singh only, who is present in court today and is duly identified by his counsel. Shri Sandhu, on instructions from aforesaid Surinder Singh has further submitted that now Surinder Singh has no objection to the aforesaid affidavit and he is bound by the same. This Court has also inquired from aforesaid Surinder Singh s/o Joginder Singh with regard to the compromise and he has accepted that the parties have compromised. However, learned counsel for the respondent states that he has not been able to contact his clients and therefore, he has no fresh instructions after the affidavit submitted by his clients along with Civil Misc. No.10277-C of 2006. He, however, has very fairly conceded that the aforesaid affidavit was filed by his clients and is on the record. In view of the aforesaid, this appeal is disposed of having been compromised as per the affidavit dated 18.10.2006. The aforesaid affidavit shall be a part of this judgment. However, liberty is granted to the parties to move necessary application if any other fact which is relevant is not put before this Court. February 26, 2010. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge