1 APPA.303-2011 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 303 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 532 OF 2010 Rafiq Hayachand Role . ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. -- Mr. A.G. Toraskar, the appointed Advocate for the Applicant. Dr. F.R. Shaikh, APP for the State. -- CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U. D. SALVI, JJ. MARCH 10, 2011. P.C.: Heard Mr. Toraskar, the learned appointed Advocate. 2 This application has been received from the jail. By the earlier order dated 29.07.2010, the applicant’s plea of being released on bail during the pendency of Criminal Appeal No. 532 of 2010 was rejected on merits. 2 APPA.303-2011 3 With the assistance of Mr. Toraskar, we have gone through the grounds raised in the bail application, and apparently we observed that there is no change in circumstances during the last about six months. The applicant claims that the prosecution failed to make out any case for conviction, and therefore, he deserves to be released on bail. The order dated 29.07.2010 rejecting the plea for bail has considered the evidence for prima facie opinion and noted that the circumstances on record do not permit the applicant to be released on bail. 4 Hence, this application on the same ground is, therefore, rejected. However, the applicant is at liberty to apply for fixing an early date of hearing of the appeal, as and when the paper book is ready. (U. D. SALVI,J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE,J.)