HON’BLE SHRI G.S.SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Appeal No.16 of 2007 Between M/s Sri Vinayaka Developers represented by its Director and another ..Appellants AND Khaja Zuhuruddin and others ..Respondents :: JUDGMENT :: Counsel for the appellants Sri M.S.Prasad Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 3 Sri P.Venugopal Counsel for respondent No.4 to 6 Sri A.Rajasekhar Reddy, Assistant Solicitor General Counsel for respondent No.7 Government Pleader for Revenue Counsel for respondent Nos.8, 12 to 15, 17 and 18 Sri P.Sriraghuram Counsel for respondent No.16 Sri Venkataraghavulu 18.1.2007 Per G.S. Singhvi, CJ This appeal is directed against order dated 11.12.2006 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.8168 of 2006, whereby she quashed order dated 31.5.1999 passed by the Government of India rejecting the application made by respondent Nos.1 to 3 under Section 18 of the Enemy Property Act, 1968. After arguing the case for some time, Sri M.S.Prasad, learned counsel for the appellants made a request that his clients may be permitted to withdraw the appeal with liberty to seek review of the order under challenge. Sri P.Venugopal, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 says that he does not have any objection. Sri A.Rajasekhar Reddy, Assistant Solicitor General says that he too does not have any objection. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed with liberty to the appellants to seek review of the order under challenge. As a sequel to dismissal of the main appeal as withdrawn, WAMP.No.24 of 2007 filed by the appellants for suspension of the order under challenge and WAMP.No.90 of 2007 filed by respondent Nos.1 to 3 for vacating the order of status quo passed on 5-1-2007 are disposed of as infructuous. G.S.SINGHVI, CJ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 18.1.2007. psr