IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY MONDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2011 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 15539 of 2004(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.JAMES KOSHY.N., SC. KSRTC SRI.K.PRABHAKARAN, SC, K.S.R.T.C. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA,SC,KSRTC SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR,SC, KSRTC RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. S.PARAMESWARAN PILLAI, HOUSE NO.PP.18/306, VALIYAVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, KURUMKUTTY, PARASSALA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PARASSALA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PARASSALA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. THE KERALA LOK AYUKTA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN R2 BY SRI.M.SREEKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.15539/2004 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF COMPLAINT NO.1175/2002 DATED 09.12.2002. EXT.P2 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE STATEMENT DATED 10.06.2003. EXT.P3 : TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 16.09.2003. EXT.P4 : TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REVIEW PETITION DATED 31.10.2003. EXT.P5 : TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE STANDING COUNSEL DATED 31.10.2003. EXT.P6 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 27.01.2004. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rv B.P. RAY, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.15539 of 2004 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 19th day of December, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following prayers: 1. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Exts.P3 and P6 orders passed by the 5th respondent. 2. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring that the 5th respondent has no jurisdiction to entertain and investiate Ext.P1 complaint as per the provisions of the Kerala Lok Ayukta Act, 1999. The learned counsel for the first respondent submits that the first respondent has sold the property to some other person and he is not interested in executing the order passed by the 5th respondent. In view of the said submission, this writ petition is closed. sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE. rv O.P. No. -:2:- B.P. RAY, J. ----------------------------------------------------------- O.P.No. 13887 of 2002 O.P. No. -:3:- ------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of November, 2011. JUDGMENT