IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 14215 of 2008. Decided on: 16.06.2011. ___________________________________________ Subhash Chand. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner is claiming regularization on the ground that he has completed 8 years of continuous service with the respondent-department. 2. Mr. Anil Jaswal, learned Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General have drawn the attention of the Court to Annexure R-1, the mandays chart 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - of the petitioner. A bare perusal of the same reflects that the petitioner has worked only for 179 days in 2002, 43 days in 2003 and 189 days in 2005. In view of this, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization/conferment of work charged status as and when he completes 8 years continuous service. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. June 16, 2011. (sck).