$3§§L32 ww’é O @ Wwg” / / BEFORE THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Headquarter. Raipur.(C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE U/A-226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR MANDAMUS/DIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. W.P.(S] NO. ROG) OF W73)“ PE’I‘TIONER / :Hariom Vishwakarma, S/o Gyanchand Vishwakarma Aged about 38 years,A.S.I (M) 7th Batalian C.A.F Bhilaj Distric Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT State of chhattisgarh Through — the Secretary Home Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Director General of police, Police Headquarter Raipur (C.G.) /r3. Inspector general of police. Police (Administration) Police H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 1209 OF 2011 Petitioner Hariom Vishwakarma Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Dy. Advocate Genera! for the State/ respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 4t“ day of March, 201 1) 1. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the representation dated 26.7.2010 (Annexure P-4) flied by the petitioner before the respondent authorities, has not been decided tili date. 2. Shri Thakur, learned counsel appearing for the State/ respondents submits that the representation dated 26.7.2010 (Annexure P-4), if has not been decided, as projected by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided, as early as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3i In View of the foregoing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing remains for adiudication in this matter. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. , L. ‘2 ”was 7.7 _ M. ’ /Sd/- spmsH K— ANGN‘HORI Judge ashok ‘