Criminal Misc. No. M-6324 of 2010(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-6324 of 2010(O&M) Date of decision : 29.06.2010 Bisham and another ....Petitioners V/s State of Haryana ....Respondent BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Ashok Tyagi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Criminal Misc. No. 31810 of 2010 This is an application for placing on record the statement of complainant Dheeraj Singh as Annexures P-6 & P-7. The application is allowed as prayed for. Statement of complainant Dheeraj Singh is taken on record. Criminal Misc. No. M-6324 of 2010 This is a petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail in a case registered against the petitioners vide FIR No. 369 dated 18.10.2009 under Sections 147/148/149/323/307/452/332/353/186/188/120-B/304 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act at Police Station Sadar, District Gurgaon. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that in the alleged occurrence which took place on 18.10.2009, there was an altercation between the workers and the security guards of Management. In the said Criminal Misc. No. M-6324 of 2010(O&M) 2 occurrence, one of the worker received injuries and died. However, due to altercation a security guard namely Dheeraj Singh also received injuries leading to inclusion of offence under Section 307 IPC. Learned counsel further submits that statement of the complainant, who is the main witness of the prosecution has already been recorded. Learned State counsel has, however, opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that allegations against the petitioners are serious in nature. He, however, agrees that complainant has already been examined but 33 other prosecution witnesses are yet to be examined. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners are stated to be in custody since 19.10.2009. Keeping in view the fact that trial is still at its initial stage and may take long time to conclude, I am of the considered view that petitioners deserve to be enlarged on bail. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant regular bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and petitioners are ordered to be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Gurgaon. June 29, 2010 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE