COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA-II No. 34 of 2009 Mrs. Pushpa joshi, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant submits before this Court that the evidence of eight prosecution witnesses have been recorded in the trial court after rejection of bail by the Sessions Judge and during the pendency of present bail application. Perusal of the record reveals that first bail application moved before this court was rejected on 10.09.2008 and the present bail application was filed on 02.05.2009. The statements of eight prosecution witnesses have been recorded after rejection of first bail application by this Court and during the pendency of second bail application. Considering the above, it would be just and proper for the applicant to move a bail application before the trial court on the basis of the evidence of witnesses recorded by the trial court and the trial court may consider all the facts and circumstances of this case and decide the bail application afresh without being prejudice of rejecting the first bail application and of filing the present bail application before this Court. The bail application of the applicant is disposed of accordingly. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 07.08.2009 LSR