w: HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTiSGARHATBlLASPUR Writ PeSition fSS No.3769 of 2037 Petjtioners 1 4. 5. Sahdev Kumar Verma S/o Shri Ganesh. Ram Verma Age about 47 .years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Pnmary School Munagi, Block- Arang, Distt. - Raipur(CG.) Raghuna.th Verma S/o Shri Tekan Verma Age about 48 years, AsstE. Teacher, Govt. Primar/ School Munagi, Blook - Arang, Distt. - Raipur ,(C.G.Z_.:.:;.^, :. -_::^ _/ Delu Ram Khare S/o Shri Ram Piasad Khare Age :at3out<34 yeare, Asstt..Teact-]er,^Govt.Primary:Schoot Charbhatta, Block;- Bilaigarh, Distt.- Ralpur (C.G.):1; :•' • ' • Smt. Champakali Baghel VWo Shri Lakhan Lal Baghel Age about 40 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Mlddle School, Bhandarpuri, BlocK - Arang, Distt. - Raipur(C.G.) . . Mani Ram Hirwani S/o Shri Paltu Ram Hinsrani Age about 35 years, Astt. Teacher, Govt Primary School, Kediyakhar, Blook - Bilaigarh, Distt. - Raipur(CG.3 . - Versus ResBondents 1. 2. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan, RaipUF(CG.) District Education ; Cfflcer, Raipur (C.G.) (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Present : Hon'bteJusticeSatishK.Adnihotn ShriAjayShrivastaya, counsel forthe petitioners. ShriYashwantSinghThakur.Govt.Advocateforthe St ORDER 1. (Passed on2m'July, 2007) LeameiJ counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that pf in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs; ^ MunJcipalCorporation.Durgandanother {2008(11) MPJR- CG 36}, which has been disposed of yide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed cpunse! appearing for the respondents doesnotcontrovertthesaidsubmission. !n subsequent cases, i.e., WriS Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma vs. The State Govt of ChhaWsgarh and another) and other conneeted matters, decided by this Oourt on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the SecreSary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopa! and the prospectus of Dipioma in Educatiorr Examination, it was. clarified that the nomenciaSure of the Basic Training InstituSe, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diptomain Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingiy, the D.Ed. Certificate ho!ders are also coversd by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gapesh Kumar Verma vs. The State Govt. of Chhattisgsrh and (Supra). Accordingly, She writ petition is allowed in terms of She order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municlpal Corporafion.Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as tb whether the petltioners have acquired B.T.I/D.Ed./B.Ed Examination Certificate on their own expenses as per the cireulars dated 24.12.1998 and 1.03.1999 andfurtherwhether they have been paid two advance Increments ornot.No order as to costs. Indu Sd/- Satisfa K. Agnihotri Judge ^^.fm*a^-^^Ssggj ^^S-?:^^71L''-' ;":1 i;l&^;'^isy'SSgSS£-. tffa;«uussaEsttay»rt-;'^s£S=sc^^a:sa3EBt