1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPEALLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Civil Application No. 3127 of 2009 with Civil Application No. 3128 of 2009 in First Appeal Stamp No. 4419 of 2009 The State of Maharashtra and others ... Applicants V E R S U S Reghuynathsingh Kalyansingh Parmar and another ... Respondents ... Smt. A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for applicants ... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:30th November, 2009 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned A.G.P. 2. The delay of 464 days caused in filing the appeal challenging the order of learned Reference Court in L.A.R.No. 30 of 1995, is sought to be condoned by the State. The learned A.G.P. contends that the delay is not deliberate. Official communication and gap thereof was one of the reasons. 3. The record reveals against such contention. The 2 impugned order is dated 30th November, 2007. The application for certified copy was not made in time. The documents were received by the office of Government Pleader on 4th February, 2009. The communication from the competent authorities, who endorsed on the files, should have been properly explained. There is nothing to this effect. The delay being exorbitant, and not explained not be condoned. The application is rejected. Necessary court fee be refunded. 4. In view of rejection of the application for condonation of delay, the appeal as well as C.A.No. 3128 of 2009 are accordingly disposed of. ( K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.) srm/ca/3127/09 3 4