:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.416 OF 2005 REVISION APPLICATION NO.416 OF 2005 REVISION APPLICATION NO.416 OF 2005 Ananta Krishna Gondhale & Ors. .....Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent ..... Shri.A.P. Pitale for Applicants Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATE DATE DATE : DECEMBER 2, 2005 : DECEMBER 2, 2005 : DECEMBER 2, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Counsel for the Applicants is unable to point out any material from the record to doubt the correctness of the opinion recorded by the Trial Court in paragraph No.7 while analysing the evidence on record. It is noted that the evidence on the material points have remained unchallenged, namely, unlawful demand of money by the accused, the complainant was illtreated, beaten and starved on failure to pay Rs.15,000/- and was driven out of the house with the threat that, if she fails to bring that amount, she will not be taken in the house. 2. If this finding is accepted as it is, which has been confirmed by the Appellate Court, in my opinion, there is no infirmity in the ultimate conclusion reached :2: by the Courts below in recording the finding of guilt against the accused for the alleged offence. 3. No case for interference in the exercise of the rivisional jurisdiction is made out. Hence dismissed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.