IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 600 OF 2007 IN MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 583 OF 2007 MRS. SMITA SANDIP KENI AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus MR. VALLABH VINAYAK JUVARKAR AND 4 ORS, ... Respondents Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Sapna Mordekar,Advocate for the applicants. Mr. F. Colaco with Ms.T Colaco, Advocates for the respondent No.3. Mr.V.Menezes, Advocate for the respondents No.1&2. Coram:- R. S. MOHITE, J. Date:- 11th October, 2007 P.C. This is an application for the appointment of Court Officer as legal guardian of respondents No. 4 & 5 for present proceeding. I am informed that there already earlier order dated 7.10.2005 is passed appointing the mother as legal guardian of respondents No. 4 & 5. The contention is that the mother who was appointed as guardian is not acting in the interest of children. This aspect can be considered when M.C.A. 583/007 is argued. For a moment, I am not inclined to entertain the application and same is rejected. In M.C.A. No.583/2007, the mother of the respondent No. 4 & 5 will continue to act as guardian who is respondent No.3. R. S. MOHITE, J. SMA