AB 4089/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Both the applications are being disposed of by this common order since the appli cations are arising out of the same case. The AB No. 4089 of 2011 has been filed by Sri Shyamal Paul, and the AB No. 3751 of 2011 has been filed by Sri Sajal Da s and Sri Manna Kumar Das. All the aforesaid petitioners have filed these applications unde r Section 438 CrPC, seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Hailakandi PS Cas e No. 486 of 2011, under Sections 120(B)/420/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 18 60, read with Section 3/7 of the Prize Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1 978. Heard Sri S C Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Sri B B Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assa m. I have also perused the Case Diary. The Case Diary reveals that the petitioners are the Chairman and Executive Members of a Company, namely, M/s Green Valley Consultancy Services L imited. The allegation against them is that they have duped a large numb er of people by way of not refunding their deposit. Hence, it is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to th e petitioners. Accordingly, both the applications stand rejected.