C^?u^ INJ-HE HIGH COURT OF JUbICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTCSeARH /2010 WRIT PETITION (S) No. ~^ ^ 2-^ PETITIONERS ,.^/ /yy /w ^/ ^' .,*' <-' ^ ^ 3. 1. Smt. Sukriya Bai Dongre, W/o Shri Prakash bongre, aged 30 years, R/o Ward No.2, New Baradawar, bistrict- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 2. Smt. Manju Devi, W/o Shri Ramesh Pawar, aged 35 year-s, R/o Ward No.IO, New Baradawar, bistrict- Janjgir- Champa (C.6.) Shiv Charan, S/o Late Shri Deepchand Pawar, aged 38 years, R/o Ward No.IO, New Baradawar, DisTrict- Janjgir- Champa (C.6.) ^. 4. Smt. Anju &evi Pawar, W/o Shri Shiv Charan Pawar, aged 32 years, R/o Ward No.IO, New Baradawar, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.6.) ^' 5. Smt. Laxmi Teji, W/o Late Shri Murari Lal Teji, aged 30, R/o Ward No.IO, New Baradawar, District- Janjgir-- Champa (C.&.) ^ 6. Vishu Kumar, S/o Shn' Ramesh Kumar Pawar, aged 21 years, R/o Ward No.IO, New Baradawar, bistrict- Janjgir- Champa (C.6.) / 7. Rahi bongre, D/o Shri Prakash Dongre, aged 23 years, R/o Ward No.2, New Baradawar, District- Janjgir-- Champa (C.G.) ^ [/ •^ 8. Smt. Pooja t)evi, W/o Shri (Soucharan Pawar, a9ed 25 years, R/o Ward No.IO, New Baradawar, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.6.) ^ 9. Smt. Pratibha Bai, W/o Shri Badri Prasad, aged 27 year-s, R/o Ward No.2, New Baradawar, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.6.) ^ 10.5mt. Shakun Jediya, W/o Late Shri Rajesh Jediya, aged 26 years, R/o Ward No.IO, New Baradawar, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.6.) 11. Satyanarayan Chavariya, S/o Shri Babulal Chavariya, aged 25 years, R/o Ward No.3, New Bar'adawar, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.6.) Versus ^ RESPON&ENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Urban Administrative & Development Depar-tment, D.K.S Bhawan, Rai'pur, Chhattisgarh 2. Nagar Panchayat, New Baradawar, bistrict- Janjgir- Champa, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, New Baradawar, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.6.) ^ ^^ A_ _^»tfL. WRIT PETITEON UNbER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSrCTUTION OF IN&IA r»A-rs.-r-^-/*i 11 -At^f~ ^tt- *^-ui- nl •"T—f^^^,i^r<k/»- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARM AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 7726 of 2010 PETITIONERS : Smt. Sukriya Bai Dongre&Others RESPONDENTS VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh & Another WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 215tday ofApril, 2011) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties fairly submit that the issue with regard to applicability of circulars dated 23/09/2010 and 05/03/2008 was considered in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others v. The State of Chhatfisgarh & Ofhers . This Court, after hearing all the parties, considered the issue and passed the order in Virendra Das Man/kpuri & Others . This petition may be disposed of accordingly. 2. Thus, having regarding to the facts situation of the case, wherein the issue involved in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others as well as in this case are one and the same, the instant petition stands disposed of in the same terms and order passed in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others1. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge