CWP(T) No. 7102/2008 21.07.2010 Present: Mr. H. K. Paul, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. A.G. for the respondents Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner’s representation dated 30.6.2000 (Annexure A-10) was decided by the respondents in terms of impugned order dated 4.8.2000 (Annexure A-11) without even adverting to and considering the contents of the representation, as also the fact that similarly situated persons had been accorded the benefits pursuant to the directions issued by this Court in CWP No. 631/1995 titled as Sita Ram Sharma vs. State of H.P. & Ors.. He has also invited my attention to the fact that note contained in Office Order dated 7.3.1988 (Annexure A-1) has also not been considered by the authorities. He, therefore, contends that a direction be issued to the authorities to consider his case afresh by taking into account not only the aforesaid material but also the contentions raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition. 2. Mr. R. K. Sharma, learned Sr. Addl. Advocate General states that the State shall have no objection to the matter in deciding the representation afresh. He assures that entire material shall be considered while taking the decision. 3. Thus without adverting to the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that the respondents shall consider and decide the petitioner’s representation after adverting to the entire material placed on record. This be done within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. The decision taken shall be communicated to the petitioner. Consequential action, if any, required to be taken in favour of the petitioner, shall also be taken within the aforesaid period. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. July 21, 2010 (rana)