IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT APPEAL NO : 1382 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 10/07/2008 in WP NO : 8843 OF 2000 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Vyavasaya Coolie Sangham (Regd. No.792/1991) Rep by its President Polekurru , Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 Government of A.P Rep by its Secretary Revenue Department , Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 District Collector Kakinada, East Godavari District. 3 Sub Collector Kakinada, East Godavari District. 4 Revenue Divisional Officer Kakinada, East Godavari District. 5 Mandal Revenue Officer Tallarevu Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MRT.N.MRANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT APPEAL No.1382 of 2008 JUDGMENT: (per BPR,J) Heard both sides, and at their request, the main appeal itself is taken up for final disposal, at the stage of admission. The appellant herein, which is a registered society, ﬁled this appeal as against the order dismissing the writ petition ﬁled by it, inter alia, seeking a mandamus to declare the action of the respondents herein in trying to issue lease orders in favour of the third parties in respect of land to an extent of Acs.64.00 in survey Nos.231C and 231/1 situated at Polekurru Village, Thotapeta Mandal, East Godavari District, as illegal and arbitrary. Learned single Judge, after taking into consideration the respective submissions, could not ﬁnd favour with the appellant, on the ground that it has failed to establish any legally enforceable right for issuance of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, while dismissing the writ petition, it was made clear that the members of the appellant-society are at liberty to apply to the respondents for grant of assignment along with other eligible persons. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that, in fact, the members of the appellant-society did make representations as long back as on 20.09.2007 and also on 15.09.2008 for considering their cases for grant of pattas in respect of the subject land. However, the same remained unconsidered. Hence, he seeks a direction for consideration of the said representations. Having heard the learned counsel on either side and on perusal of the material on record, and in view of the directions already issued by the learned single Judge in favour of the members of the appellant-society to apply and especially when the representations were already made, we are of the opinion that there is no impediment in directing the concerned authority to consider and dispose of the representations, dated 20.09.2007 and 15.09.2008 submitted by the members of the petitioner-society, on merits, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction, the Writ Appeal is disposed of. No costs. ________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J Dt:24.10.2008 _______________ G.CHANDRAIAH , J Note: Furnish C.C. in one week. (B/o) GJ