1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1499 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1499 OF 2011 *** 1. Advocate Shri Kazi contends that long before the applications for necessary deposit are accepted from petitioners for enrolling them as life members and no decision thereafter has been taken, the petitioners, therefore, moved application under section 41A and sought direction. The application has been erroneously rejected by the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Jalgaon. 2. With the assistance of learned counsel I have perused application. Application dated 25th June, 2010 seeks direction to the trust to enroll present petitioners as life members after completing necessary procedure. It is, therefore, an application for grant of membership. 3. Powers under section 41-A of Bombay Public Trust Act are administrative in nature and no adjudication is possible in it. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1499 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. Hence, I do not see any jurisdictional error or perversity in it. However, looking to the nature of controversy, petitioners are given liberty to move appropriate application before the appropriate authority. Petition is disposed of accordingly with such liberty. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:25/03/2011. ans/1499