, ..,.. .. _. OF 1997. WRIT PETITION’NO. 1. Ranjit Singh son of Shri Karnail Singh, aged about 50 years; Narendra Sinh, son of Shri Santosh Singhr‘aged about 43 years; both resident of Royal Khalsa Dhaba, Janjgiri, G.E. Road, Durg, District Durg, M.P. PETITIONERS. V E R S U S. The State of Madhya Pradesh, throuh the Chief Secretary, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, M.P. 2. The Land Acquisition Officer/ Sub Divisional Officer, Patan, District Durg, M.P. ycwaf g. maxxage?' 9 PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARIL MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION ETC. AND FOR ANY OTHER WRIT OR WRITS, ORDER OR Grid _ gurg,m.P- RESPONDENTS. :‘J—v f1g CONTINUED oh PAGE No. 2. g g ; i ,rv 7, i Admittedly, the acquisition as for the benent of respondent No.3 and at its request the no' cation was issued. Dining the pendency of the writ petition, a se ement has been anived at between the petitioners and the respon nt No.3, which is reflected in paragraph 3 of the application for thdrawal (I.A.No.5790/ 2002) of the writ petition. The said paragraph xe‘hds thus: “That under the changed circumstances, petitioners as well as Management of respondent Xi—HCJZ <7/7 9 ‘ m WWW-63 W 2%)!) %T6_{§ eérmaa-r NEW WEEWW arm trrq-cvh' 1§ ii??? ifm at m 311% 23- 10-2002 Shri Manindra Shrivastava, counsel for the petitionexs. ‘ R Shri Ranbir Singh, Govt. Adv. for raspondent-NOS. 1 and 2. Shri P.S. Koshy with Sh11 Vinod D€shmukh, counsel for MV\‘\‘ respondent No.3. Hemd on I.A.No. 5790/ 2002. The challenge in this writ petition is to the notice dated 1‘1-08- 1997 (Annexure ,P — 6) issued der Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act in of 'on of khasra Nos. mspect acquis' Nos. 673/5, 673/ 14 and 673/ 15 situate at village Janj' ‘ ' Tehsil Dhamda’, District Durg. According to the petitioners, the a 'tion, not been in accordance with the rules is null and void and liable to be declared as such. XE-HC-22 WW. 3&3? m .‘..w<Es§g:.37.7&/7gq m ms; : \\‘ Murthy 1 P.C-Naik Judge i