THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.22902 of 2005 ORAL ORDER: Seeking a declaration that the action of the respondent, in conducting counselling for the purpose of transfer for the year 2005, was arbitrary and illegal, the present writ petition is filed. This Court, by order dated 27-10-2005, while holding that the respondent shall be entitled to proceed with the counselling for the purpose of effecting transfer of teaching and non-teaching staff, directed that it shall be open to the petitioner to furnish a list of three places of her choice for the purpose of transfer and in case she is not accommodated in any of the three places, it shall be open to the petitioner to move this Court by way of an appropriate application. Sri Moola Vijaya Bhaskar, learned standing counsel for the respondent, would submit that the respondents have not proceeded with the counselling for effecting transfers for the year 2005, and have not effected any transfers. Learned standing counsel would submit that the cause in this writ petition does not survive. Sri K.Ranjeet Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri M.V.S.Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that since the respondents are likely to issue guidelines for counseling for the year 2006, the petitioner should be granted liberty to file a writ petition as and when such guidelines are issued. This request made on behalf of the petitioner is only to be noted to be rejected. The cause in this writ petition relates to transfers for the year 2005 and since it is now represented that no transfers have been effected during the year 2005, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous. Whether the respondents are likely to issue guide lines or not are all matters in the realm of conjectures and such the question of granting liberty to the petitioner does not arise. Needless to state that in case the petitioner is aggrieved by any action of the respondents, it is always open to her to question the same in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. __________ 4-4-2006 asp THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.22902 of 2005 DATE: 4-4-2005 Between: N.Vijaya Lakshmi … Petitioner And A.P. Residential Educational Institutions Society, Hyderabad … Respndent