- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.702 OF 2000 NO.702 OF 2000 NO.702 OF 2000. Amir Parks & Amusements Pvt.Ltd. ..Plaintiffs. vs. Mr.Hemant Kothari. ..Defendant. .... None for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendant. .... CORAM CORAM CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 13TH JANUARY 2009 : 13TH JANUARY 2009 : 13TH JANUARY 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This suit had appeared before this Court for ex-parte decree on 24th November 2008, when the plaintiffs and their Advocates were absent. The suit was, therefore, adjourned for one week. Once again, the suit appeared for ex-parte decree on 1st December 2008, when none appeared for the plaintiffs and the suit was adjourned for two weeks. 2. On 15th December 2008, once again none appeared for the plaintiffs and the suit was adjourned beyond X’mas vacation. The suit once again appeared under the caption "Un-defended suits for ex-parte decree" on 12th January 2009 when the plaintiffs and their Advocates remained absent. - 2 - 3. The suit was, therefore, adjourned today and is appearing under the caption "For Dismissal". However, the plaintiffs and their Advocates are absent. It is, therefore, clear that the plaintiffs are not interested in prosecuting the suit any further. 4. The suit is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.] J.] J.]