_ / ^oo^ IN THE VSIGS 60BBI 3IiBI@ffi(IBE :: eHBBTISGABB i: BILASPBR WBII fennw m :c?>6oo (JF -" f. raiITKWEg KESPtfflBEKrS 8 StlSBeEP KBtlAB PWBBY ^aged 2®years t s/o Shri N.N.Pandey ( B ) Snun-Pttst : Earbl / Tah •^Muageli Blstriet • Bilaspur €.6. - 1T_E_B_SJ!A • t' 1< ^ J2 sr«rea- cafMraiSGABH Thrtuah $ The SecTetary to the Cweraaant Af Qibattisgath Agrleulture Bepartaent NaatraUy » Katpar e.6. THE BIHECTOB W AgBIGtitIBBS GhhattlsgaA : Balpnr e.6. rern'iw wmsB WEI E 2&6/227 OF eaasNTBriai w IIBIA TOR ISSBAHGB NMT/aiBBeraen Id •i;ll!liti!|<<ijailj ^»*Ct)(^ XI-HC-22 -s^ ^iraRTC. 's^frH1!®,•faway ^ WHPii 9iW^i yf-A3o,^<5p/03 ''ST, 200 'f^S^I' --/TT^?f ^"i fera'-snt?! i^ 3Ti^?r FRirer'Eifer 21-12-2005 Petitioner by Shri fiv^^^ f^i^k*^?, Advocate. Shri VivekSharma, PanelXawyerJ the employee has occurred on or after 1-| inbatch ofcases bearingW.P. No.1322/^ li<-i'i']i TTPi'?ff-'3 fsvQ WsresR ^ STT^ STT^I for the State. Heard. This case relates to compassion^te appointment consequent upon the deatb. ofan employee sewing in the State. Learned counsel for the petitione( categoricalty stated that in this case, the death of fl 1 -1997 and not earlier. It is further submitted that p002 involving the same question orders have been passed by this Court on 20/12/2005. He' jsrays that similar orders may be passed in this case also. Learned counsel for the State doe of Chhattisgarh has taken a decision ^ not dispute theabove fact and state that the State to consider the cases of dependants of those Copy to the State counsel, who| respondents for compliance. employees who died on or after 1/11/19^7 strictly in accordance with the policy prevalent at thattime. tn view of the submissions macje by le^ned counsel appearing for the parties, v< • _ _ ' wjthout expressing any opinionon the m^rits ofthe¥ase,.intheopinjonofthisCourt, endsof justice will be sen/ed if a direct.ion is giv^n to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities concerned to consider and decide the c^se of the petitioner in accordance with the policy prevalent at the time of death of the enr|ployee concerned. If the petitioner found etigible, appointment orders will be issued as egjrty as possible on or before 30 April, 2006. The petitioner is also directed to render due c{)-operation to the authorities. It is made clear that if any grievance still remains, the petitiorjer may avail the remedy avaitable under the law including filing of the petition before this (j;ourt. With the aforesaid observatjons, t|iis petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. will be obliged to communic.ate the order to the Sd/- ^ -'^. je L iiu' S'^d