1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 1702 of 2010 Vibhuti Narayan Rai ..VERSUS.. Sanjeev Kumar Chandan and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. A. C. Dharmadhikari, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Y. Bombaywala, Advocate for respondent no.1 Mr. P. V. Bhoyar, A.P.P. For Respondent no.4/State. CORAM : Prasanna B. Varale, J. DATED : 5 th May , 2011 . Heard learned Advocate for the applicant. A pursis Stamp No. 1104/2011 is filed on record stating therein that the respondent no.1/original complainant vide his application dated 21/3/2011 (Exh.9) filed before the trial court, has withdrawn his complaint bearing Summary Criminal Complaint Case No. 1390/2010, preferred against the present applicant and respondent nos.2 and 3. It is further stated that The learned trial Court has allowed the application (Exh.9) vide its order dated 21/3/2011 and all the accused persons including the present applicant are acquitted of the offence punishable under Sections 499 r/w Section 500, 500(1) and 509 of I.P.C. A copy of the application (Exh.9) and order passed therein dated 21/3/2011, is placed on record as Doc. No.1. The learned Advocate for the applicant submits that in view of this, nothing remains in the present application and the application may be disposed of as infructuous. In view of the pursis filed by the applicant, the criminal application is disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE Diwale