IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2010 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 21653 of 2008(C) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SUNIL K.MANOHAR, S/O.C.R.MANOHARAN, 25 YEARS, POONITHURA PO., ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM. *ADDL. R2 & R3 IMPLEADED 2. K.V.REGI, AGED 50, S/O. VASUDEVAN, KAMBIYAKATH HOUSE, CHANDIROOR P.O., CHERTHALA. 3. K.R.BEENA, AGED 42, W/O. M.K.GAGARIN, MANAVELIKAKATH HOUSE, NORTH VAIMEETHI, EROOR P.O., THRIPUNITHURA. ADDL. R2 & R3 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DTD.29.8.2008 IN IA.11096/2008. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.RANI DIOTHIMA ADDL. R2 & R3 BY ADVS. SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNA MENON, SRI.M.JITHESH MENON. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/12/2010 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.21653/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE RESPONDENT ISSUING THE REGULAR PERMIT TO THE PETITIONER. P2:- COPY OF THE PERMIT THAT WAS ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER TO OPERATE ON THE ROUTE THALAYOLAPARAMBU-THOPPUMPADY. P3:- COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT FOR CONVENING A TIMING CONFERENCE TO REVISE THE PETITIONER'S TIMINGS. ANNEXURE A:- COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE IN RESPECT OF KL-04/K.3239. ANNEXURE B:- COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE IN RESPECT OF KL-7/AN.9432 OF THE 2ND PETITIONER. ANNEXURE C:- COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 29.4.08. ANNEXURE D:- COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE IST PETITIONER DTD. 31.5.2008. ANNEXURE E:- COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DTD. 2.4.08. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS R2(a):- COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE IN RESPECT OF KL-04/K.3239. R2(b):- COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE IN RESPECT OF KL-7/AN.9432. R2(c):- COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE ADDL. 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 31.5.2008. R2(d)-:- COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE ADDL. 3RD RESPONDENT DTD. 29.4.2008. TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.21653 OF 2008 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 8th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2010 J U D G M E N T Aggrieved by Exhibit P3 notice issued by the RTO to have a timing conference, this Writ Petition has been filed. The main contention raised by the petitioner is that once the timings have been settled that too on 29.4.2008 and permit was issued and the matter has become final, the authority cannot suo motu entertain any such objections to revise the time. Reliance is placed on various decisions of this Court. 2. The learned counsel appearing for additional respondents 2 and 3 submitted that they had filed revision petitions before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal which have been dismissed and another Writ Petition is pending before this Court. This Court had passed an interim order also in this case. In the light of the above facts, Exhibit P3 cannot be sustained and as the contesting respondents have already availed of other remedies, no action is required, obviously. Therefore the Writ Petition is disposed of, recording the above. Sd/-( T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.) dsn