-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.W.P.NO.58 OF 2008 Atamaram @ Baban Hari Tambe ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents ... Shri.M.R.Jhakde Advocate (absent) for the Petitioner Smt.P.H.Kantharia APP for State ... CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 14, 2008 DATE : FEBRUARY 14, 2008 DATE : FEBRUARY 14, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This matter was on board on 7.2.2008 and on that day, the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the Petitioner were absent. In the interest of justice, we adjourned the matter for one week. Even today when the matter is called out at 12.15 p.m. the learned counsel for the Petitioner is absent. No one reports the difficulty. It appears that the grievance of the Petitioner is redressed and therefore, the Petitioner is not attending the Court. Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ S.B.MHASE, J.]