IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1197 of 2008 1. GANESH RAM SON OF LATE SUKAN RAM. 2. SHEO PUJAN RAM, SON OF GANESH RAM. BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KHURD (MAROLI), P.S.- KUTUMBA, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR For the petitioners :Mr. Sailesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Anil Kumar, A.P.P. ----------- 2 23.06.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioners herein are the members of second party to a proceeding initiated under Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. They are aggrieved by order dated 4.7.2008 passed by the learned S.D.M., Aurangabad which was assailed before and confirmed by the learned Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, Bihar in Cr. Rev. no. 53 of 2008 (Ganesh Ram and Ors versus State of Bihar). On a police report, the Court initiated the aforesaid proceeding against the petitioners. They were required to appear and file their respective show causes. Bare perusal of order dated 4.7.2008 would show that the parties to the proceeding created a scene in the face of the Court. Having seen the conduct of the petitioners herein, the learned Magistrate passed the impugned order directing the petitioner herein to furnish security bond for maintaining peace for a period of one year. It is the admitted position at the Bar that pursuant to the said order, bonds were executed for the said period of one year which has already expired. Learned Appellate Court by a well reasoned order 2 considered the submission of the petitioners and came to the conclusion that there was absolutely no need to interfere with the said order. Learned Appellate Court has also assigned an additional reason that the order dated 4.7.2008 stood confirmed as some of the members of the second party did not even file appeal against the aforesaid order. This Court finds no infirmity in the orders impugned. The revision application has no merit. It is accordingly dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )