IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15728 of 2010 Date of Decision : September 06, 2010. Sushil Singhal .....Petitioner versus Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner impugns the appointment of sole Arbitrator made by the PSIDC as also the consequential notice received by him from the said Arbitrator to attend the proceedings. The petitioner's main plea is that he has already discharged the entire loan liability under the “One Time Settlement” arrived at between him and the PSIDC and as such, there exists no “dispute” to be resolved by the Arbitrator. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length, I am of the considered view that all the pleas taken by the petitioner in this writ petition can very well be pressed before the Arbitrator who C.W.P.No .15728 of 2010 2 shall also be obligated to decide as to whether or not there exists any dispute between the parties, justifying the arbitral proceedings. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Dasti. September 06, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE