IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13266 of 2006 1. Awadh Bihari Mandal, S/o- Shiv Nandan Mandal, Resident of Village- Adavan, P.S.-Baheri, District- Darbhanaga. 2. Ram Bihari Mandar, S/o- Sukhdeo Mandar, 3. Brahmdeo Mandal, S/o- Gango Mandal, Both Resident of Village+P.O.-Dhanauli, P.S.- Baheri, District- Darbhanga. …………… Petitioners. VERSUS 1. Bihar School Examination Board, Sinha Library Road, Patna through its Secretary. 2. The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Sinha Library Road, Patna. 3. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Sinha Library Road, Patna. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. B.N.P. Singh, Advocate. For the B.S.E.B. : Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate. Mr. Satyabir Bharti, Advocate. ---------------------- 04 08.12.2008 The three petitioners have filed this writ application that they were students of various batches of a course known as Certificate in Physical Education conducted by the Bihar School Examination Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board). They had pursued their studies and allegedly completed their courses from the Central Sharirik Shaikshik Prashikshan Parishad, Sitamarhi. They had taken their examination conducted in the year 1988 and have annexed their admit cards, originals whereof have been produced in Court and perused by the Court. Learned AAG-3 pursuant to earlier order of this Court has produced the tabulation register of the Board for the examination conducted in the year 1988, for the Sessions in question petitioners roll nos. do not even appear in the tabulation register. For example, for the Session 1981-82, there are two petitioners, who are having admit cards 2 with roll nos. 6 and 86, roll no. 6 is not at all there in the tabulation register and so far as 86 is concerned, it is beyond the batch strength itself because the total class ends at 84. Similarly, So far as petitioner of Session 1983-84 is concerned, his roll no is 4 and he does not find mention in the tabulation register in the said Session. In view of the facts aforesaid, this Court cannot grant any relief to the petitioners and the writ application is dismissed, accordingly. Trivedi/ ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)