wp3402.11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ WRIT PETITION NO. 3402 OF 2011 PRATAP GULABRAO KALBHOR VERSUS THE COLLECTOR AHMEDNAGAR AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr.Mantri R.R. Advocate for Respondents : Mr. B H Ausarmalr for R/5 to 10, Mr. R M Sancheti for R/4. ... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. Dated: November 23, 2011 ... There is consensus between the parties that the concerned Court i.e. C.J.S.D., Ahmednagar shall first consider the objection filed by the petitioner herein which is at Exh.E from pages 62 to 63 of the compilation of the petition and thereafter, shall pass appropriate orders. 2 The contention of the Counsel for petitioner is that the counter-claim has been filed not only by defendants but other five wp3402.11 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ persons are joined for filing counter claim. Therefore, the objection raised by the petitioner to such counter-claim has to be considered before passing any order to file WS. 3 In the aforesaid background, the concerned C.J.S.D., Ahmednagar is directed to consider the objection of the petitioner at Exh.29 and then proceed further in the matter. The writ petition is disposed of on above terms. It is needless to clarify that the interim relief stands vacated. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) PLK/*