1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 2337 of 2011 Date of Decision: 28th Sept.,2011. Jai Kumar and another ....Petitioners Versus Managing Director, UHBVNL, Panchkula and others ..Respondents Civil Writ Petition No.6040 of 2011 Mubarik Ali and another ....Petitioners Versus Managing Director, UHBVNL, Panchkula and others ..Respondents Civil Writ Petition No.2361 of 2011 Jagdish Chander Gupta ....Petitioner Versus Managing Director, UHBVNL, Panchkula and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Present: Mr.V.D.Sharma Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Sudhir Hooda Advocate for the respondents. * * * Nirmaljit Kaur, J.(Oral) The petitions bearing Nos.2337 of 2011, 6040 of 2011 and 2361 of 2011 are being disposed of vide a common order as the issue involved is common. The prayer in these petitions is for direction to the respondents to grant the petitioners pay fixation in the 2nd ACP Scale as admissible under the modified notification dated 20.02.2004 being eligible. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners 2 that the relief claimed by the petitioners is squarely covered by the ratio of the judgment rendered in CWP No.14580 of 2006 decided on 07.05.2008 titled as Prem Paul and others Vs. The Managing Director, Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and Others. However, learned counsel for the respondents prays for some more time to file reply. Although, he does not dispute the said fact. Thus, the petitions, being squarely covered by the ratio of the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in Prem Paul and others (supra), are allowed in the same terms as CWP No.14580 of 2006 decided on 07.05.2008. (Nirmaljit Kaur) 28th September, 2011. Judge Seema-II