r;.'.;",' l''^6" 'E^V''' m ^4 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETFTION No. 2641 of2001 PETITIONER : M/S Rahul Castings Foraings Industries, A Partnership Firm, Through, one of its partners, Shd Sunil Kumar Pafhak, Aged about 50 years, Son of Shri Mukut Narayan Pathak, At Bhanpuri, Raipur Town, Tahsil and District Raipur. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. Central Baak of India, A body corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition And truisfer of undertakings) Act 5 of 1970, having its central office at Chandramukhi building, Narimaa poiat, Mumbai, braneh at phaphadih Raipur Town, Raipur Tahsil and district Raipur, through the managing director. 2. Central Barik of India, throu^i Chief Manger- Recovery, Central bank of India, Zonal Office, Raipur, CUiattisgarh. 3. Central Bank of India, throu^i Senior Manager, Central Baak oflndia, Phaphadih Branch, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. PETmON UNDER ARTtCLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTmJTION OF BSIiaA. SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenlhotri. J. Present: Shri B.P.Shanna, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri B.D.Gum, Advoeate forthe respondeuts. ORALORDER 1. 2. 2.tmt (Passed on 17UI day of November, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for flie petitioner submits tfaat the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merit. However, fhe petitioner be permitted to make a representation before the bank autfaorities, wfao in tum, shall consider Ihe same in accordance with law within a stipulated period, to which Shri Guru, leamed counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection. In view ofthe foregoing, this petition is disposed ofwith a direotion to the concemed bank authorities to eonsider the representation ofthe petitioner in accordance with law, preferably wifhin a period oftiiree months from tiie date of receipt of a eopy of ttie representation made by the petitioner, if any. No orderastocosts. ,—_ Sd/- satish K. Agnihotri Judge