IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2853 of 2009 JATA SHANKAR PRASAD YADAV . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. . ----------- 5. 23.02.2011 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The Superintendent of Police, Siwan and Buxar respectively are present. Mr. Chakradhari Sharan Singh appearing for the State submits that earlier the Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur at Arrah was Chairman of the Selection Committee noticed as Respondent no. 5 in the order of the writ Court. Subsequently he was transferred to Siwan. His role as Chairman came to an end. In this imbroglio the representation of the petitioner could not be considered appropriately. Mr. Singh submits that he has instruction to state that if the petitioner submits a fresh representation before the DIG, BMP (Central) Patna, the representation of the petitioner shall be considered in terms of the direction in the writ petition. The order on the writ petition was specific against Respondent no. 5 which office no more existed by the time the compliance of the order of the Court was required. The Court is therefore satisfied that no proceeding shall lie in contempt jurisdiction. If the petitioner represents before the DIG, BMP (Central) Patna it is required to be disposed off in the manner directed earlier expeditiously. The MJC application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)