1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.1204/2008 (Parveen Vyas Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : April 09, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Dr.S.S.Jodha, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor. Mr.O.P.Joshi, for the complainant. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Public Prosecutor for the State and the counsel appearing for the first informant. Perused the order impugned as well as the challan papers. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is absolutely no evidence connecting the petitioner with the commission of crime; there is no evidence of any witness having witnessed the occurrence or the last seen and due to suspicion, the petitioner has been implicated that his friend Yunus and Akhtar had illicit relation with the daughters of the deceased and the petitioner being their friend. The only evidence available is that a clip alleged to have been recovered from the petitioner. The injuries suffered by the deceased are bruises and abrasions of small dimension. Be that as it may, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that except the alleged 2 recovery of clip, there is no direct evidence of having witnessed the occurrence or the last seen, without commenting on the merit of the case, taking into account the oral arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Praveen Vyas s/o Shyam Sunder be released on bail in FIR No.14/2008, P.S. Merta Sahar, Distt. Nagaur provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-