CWP No.9821 of 2009.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.9821 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.04.2010 **** Sukhdev Kaur and others . . . . Petitioners VS. State of Punjab and another . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Amit Chopra, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG, Punjab ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The prayer in this Civil Writ Petition is to direct the respondents to count the service towards pension/pensionary benefits rendered by the petitioners in the private-managed schools, before the same were taken over by the State Government. (2). The respondents have filed their counter-affidavit wherein it is averred that the claim of petitioners No.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9&13 has been found sustainable as per the decisions of this Court and necessary recommendations have, accordingly, been made. CWP No.9821 of 2009.doc - 2 – (3). As regards petitioners No.8,10,11&12, the respondents have come up with a plea that they are not entitled to the benefit as prayed for. (4). In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to issue necessary sanction and grant the consequential benefits to petitioners No.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9&13. As regards the other petitioners (No.8,10,11&12), let respondents pass an appropriate speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order to impugn the same in accordance with law before an appropriate forum, if so desired. (5). Ordered accordingly. (6). Dasti . (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 26.04.2010 vishal shonkar