-:- 1 -:- Writ Petition No.6152 of 2011 (S). 30.11.2011 :- Shri P.M.Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard on the question of admission. O R D E R BY filing this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-employer has challenged the order dated 12.05.2011 passed by the Labour Court, Dhar in Case No.6/I.D.Claim/2009. [2] Briefly stated the Labour Court, Dhar had passed an award on 21.02.2006 in Case No.45/I.D.R./2004 directing the petitioner-employer to classify the Respondents on the post of Lower Division Clerk and Assistant Sub Inspector respectively and to pay them salary of the said posts. When the said order regarding grant of monetary benefits flowing from the classification was not extended in favour of the Respondents- workmen, they filed an application before the Labour Court by invoking Section 33-C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [for short “the Act]. [3] The Labour Court on the basis of its earlier order dated 21.02.2006 by which the entitlement was decided and the -:- 2 -:- evidence recorded by it in the application under Section 33-C (2) of the Act held that the Respondents-workmen are entitled for the difference of the amount to the extent of Rs.2,03,949-00 and Rs.2,38,149-00 respectively. It is this order which is under challenged in this petition. [4] Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and the impugned order passed by the Labour Court, we find no illegality in the impugned order warranting interference by this Court in this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The amount which has been computed and has been ordered to be paid to the Respondents has been arrived at by the Labour Court taking into consideration its earlier order dated 21.02.2006 and the fresh evidence recorded in the application under Section 33-C (2) of the Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not point out any infirmity or illegality in the computation and the entitlement of the Respondents and in the order passed by the Labour Court. In the circumstances the petition fails and is hereby dismissed. [ Shantanu Kemkar ] [ Prakash Shrivastava ] JUDGE JUDGE (AKS) -:- 3 -:-