I l H§QH €6URT §F $31HATT§S¥3ARH gimSPUR Writ Pan‘mm $3 1336 0*? 2668 Petitioner Smt. Puspakah Twvat Wlo Shn Rakkumar Tiwari (mgr marnage ’nwam aged abnut 4b year; AsszataH leac‘wur GavemmEnt Cxrla Dnmary School } Mastun Bock Mastun Dsst€ Bilasour (CG) Versus tnrm‘qb Secretary, Mantralaya DKS 2) The District Eoucatxcn Officer Dxgmm (QC; 3) mow tducation 0f“: er ”v actur Dxsfc Btiaapur J J 1 Resbondents 1) State cf Chhattisgarh, Department of Education, Bhawan Qaipur (CG) Biiasp‘ur {Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Censtiiution of indie) 3B: Honibie Mr. Saiigh K. Agnihotri, J. ?resent: Shri AewaniShukia, ceuneeiforfhe eetitierer 8m Aiek Bakehi, Gevt. Advocate faithe $tete. GRAL GREER (Passed on 27-3-2008) With comseni of iearned counsei appearing fer both the parties, i‘ne mat’‘ter is heard finaiiy. 2‘) Teacher on a fixed pay scaie oi Rs. 150i— for the period of two years. After compierion of probation, th petitioner was granted R5545I- on ‘19—”! D—‘i 984. 3) The question of raw invoiveci herein asio whe‘iher the oetiiioner is entiiied to reguier pay scaie with efreor from {he date of énitier eopoiniment or from the oate of compietion of probation period. 4} Learneo‘ counsei appearing for the petitioner as weii as for the 'tateir‘espondentsjointiy submit that the facts and question of ‘xiaw invoiveo‘ in the petition are thesame to that of Writ Petition (S) No.59? The petiiioner was initiaiiv appointed on 29391933 as Aseistani reguia-r pay scaie of ,., e or 230$ (s shat r \r e ik Tiwa.’i & sthers Vs. $m€e of Chhattisgari‘i & bthers), which was aRowed vide order dated 7—11-2G05‘ Learned counsei further submit mat this petmon may be disposed cf in the same terms. J 6) ' in View cf ihe abcve—siated submission imade by ieamed ceumsei i appearing fer the parties, the writ petiiion is aiidwedji in the same terms Le, the petitioner is entitied to reguiar pay scaie wiih effect from the date of initiai appointment, subject to verification of the facts. No order asto costs. i Raj u