wp1075.11.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.1075 OF 2011 Smt.Vimal Shankar Jagtap & others Vs. The Chief Executive Officer & others ........................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................................ Shri P.D.Meghe, Counsel for the Petitioners. Shri J.Y.Ghurade, Counsel for the Respondents. CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 29. NOVEMBER, 2011. This petition challenges the judgment and order dated 31.8.2010 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal, dismissing the Misc.Application (ULP) No.5 of 2008 for condonation of delay for filing the revision under Section 44 of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971. Though there is no limitation prescribed for filing the revision, the question of delay and laches can certainly be considered by the Industrial Court while entertaining the revision application. Undisutedly, the revision has been filed after lapse of eight years. The Industrial Court has permitted the parties to lead evidence on the aspect of delay. The Industrial Court has dealt with all the reasons put forth explaining the delay caused in filing the revision application. Ultimately, in para-11 of the judgment after taking into consideration the .....2/- wp1075.11.odt 2 certificate of Doctor dated 21.5.2008 issued showing illness of the petitioner, the finding is recorded that there is no sufficient caused made out for condonation of delay. Hence, no interference is called for in the order impugned in this petition. The petition is dismissed. JUDGE BrWankhede ...../-