IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 20677 of 2010 Date of decision : 24.02.2011 Manish Yadav ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Vikram Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Narender Singh, D.A.G., Haryana for respondent No.3. Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) The main grievance emanating from the record is that although, the petitioner moved representation dated 29.10.2010 (Annexure P-4), but the same has not yet been decided by respondent No.2. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record and considering the entire matter deeply, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2, to decide the representation (Annexure P-4) filed by the petitioner, keeping in view the provisions of Sections 6 & 11 of “The Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994” and Article 243 of the Constitution of India, by passing a speaking order, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. February 24, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge