IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 101/2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2587/2003 ( Natthu Babarao Sable vs. Ompakash Bakoria) ...................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ...................................................................................................................................................................... None for petitioner. Mr. Tareeq Jahir counsel h/f Shri P.B.Patil, counsel for Respondent ... CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 22nd SEPTEMBER, 2010. None for the petitioner. Shri Tareeq Jahir, learned counsel holding for Shri P.B.Patil, appearing for the respondent points out the statement made in para 2 of the affidavit dated 27.8.2010 filed by the respondent. The said statement is as under; “2. The aforesaid Corrigendum would reveal that the petitioner's period of suspension from 26.6.1991 to 31.12.1993 is treated as suspension and during the said period, the petitioner was given subsistence allowance as per rules, nothing was required to pay further to the petitioner. In so far as the period after dismissal i.e. 31.12.1993 to 30.6.1996 is concerned, the same has been treated as period on duty and under Rule 68(2), 70(2), (4) (6) & (8) of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Joining Time etc.) 1991, the entire salary and other benefits for aforesaid period are awarded to the petitioner. As such, the order dated 5.7.2007 has been complied with. The learned counsel has placed on record the order dated 13th September, 2010, which is marked as 'X' for identification, pointing out that the payment has also been made to the petitioner and the order has been complied with. In view of aforesaid statement made in the affidavit and the order dated 13th September, 2010, I do not think that it is a case to proceed with the present contempt petition. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE Rvjalit