IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2008 / 17TH ASHADHA 1930 RP.No. 596 of 2008(T) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.13602/2006 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:- ----------------------------------------------- ANIL KUMAR P., AGED 42 YEARS, S/O KELUKUTTY, PUTHIYONAN HOUSE, KUTTIKKAKAM P.O., EDAKKAD 670 663, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.PAREETH SRI.MOHAMMED SHAMEEL RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:- -------------------------- 1. THE LABOUR COURT, KANNUR. 2. P. BALAKRISHNAN, PUTHELATH VEEDU, PATEL ROAD, P.O. CHIRAKKAL 670 011, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.PAULSON C,VARGHESE GP. SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J ============== R.P.No. 596 OF 2008 ==================== Dated this the 8th day of July, 2008. O R D E R After arguing the review petition for some time, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition itself, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to take all his contentions before the Labour Court, Kollam, in a petition under Section 33(C) (2), stated to have been filed by the workman involved in the writ petition, for computation of the amounts due under the award which is challenged herein. After hearing the petitioner, the review petition is allowed on the above condition and the writ petition itself is dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to raise all his contentions before the Labour Court, Kollam, in a petition under Section 33(C)(2), stated to be filed by the workman involved, to the extent such contentions are admissible in a petition under Section 33(C)(2) for computation of amounts due under an award. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE bkn/-