IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI MONDAY, THE 17TH AUGUST 2009 / 26TH SRAVANA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 121 of 2009 ---------------------------- OPDIV.1030/2007 of FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM .................... PETITIONER: --------------- THOMAS @ ROY PHILIP, S/O. PHILIP MAVELIL HOUSE, MUNDACKAL PADINJARE DESOM, KOLLAM DISTRICT (NOW WORKING AS ASST.ENGINEER KOTTAYAM MUNICIPALITY) BY ADV. SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE RESPONDENT: --------------- BLAIZE FERNANDEZ, D/O. ROCKY FERNANDEZ, THAYILPARAMBIL, T.C.27/1355 VANCHIYOOR, RISHIMANAGALAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT HOUSE NO. 32,VANI GARDENS, CHEERAMCHIRA BHAGOM, CHETHIPUZHA VILLAGE CHANGANACHERRY TALUK. ADV. SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE FOR R1 THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== MAT APPEAL NO. 121 OF 2009 ============================ DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2009 JUDGMENT Basant,J. The appellant-husband has come to this Court allegedly aggrieved by a decree for divorce. During the pendency of this appeal and the connected appeals, the parties have settled their disputes in the presence of the Mediator and the terms of settlement have been recorded and duly signed by the contestants and counter signed by their respective counsel. The terms of settlement is available in this Mat Appeal. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that in the light of the settlement and the acceptance of the decree for divorce, this Mat Appeal may now be dismissed upholding the impugned decree for divorce. Request accepted. This Mat Appeal is dismissed as agreed. R. BASANT, JUDGE M.C. HARI RANI,JUDGE ks. WPC. 2 ks.