\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR D.B.: Hon’ble Shri Justice Sunil Kumar Sinha and Hon’ble Shri Justice Radhe Shyam Sharma { F, Writ Appeal No.64 of; 201,1 1. Sanjay‘ Kumar Bhojani, aged about 51 years, Slo Late Prabhu al BhOJanI R/o Civil Lines Near Railway Station Jal Shanker Nlwas Rajnandgaon Praful Kumar BhOJanI aged about 51 years Late Prabhulal BhOJanI R/o CIVII Lines Near Railway Station Jai Shanker NrwasRaJnandgaon - Kamleeh Kumar Bhojani, aged about; 47 years, S/o Late Prabhulal Bhojani, R/o Civil Lines,?Near Railway Station, Jai Shanker Niwas, Rajnandgaon ' Sunil Kumar Bhojani, aged about 45 years, S/o Late Prabhulal Bhojani, R/o Civil Lines, Near Railway Station, Jai Shanker Niwas,'Rajnandgaon Ag gellants ersus 1 .‘ The State of Chhattisgarh,‘ through its Secretary Commercial Tax Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur Chh’atti'sgarh State Minor Forest i Produce (T&D), through its Managing Director, Cooperative Federation Ltd, A—25, VIP Club Khamrdih, Shanker Nagar Raipur ‘ Commrssroner Commercral Ta Vanuylk Kar Bhawan CIVII Line Raipur Managing Director District Minor Forest Produce Cooperative Union. Lts. '& Conservator of‘ Forest, Kanker and Durg Resgondents Present Shri Parag Kotecha counsel forthe appellants , Shri AS Kachhawaha Deputy Advocate General for' the State/respondents. v t , x s ' Writ Appeal under Section 2(1) of the Chhattlsgarh High Court (Appeal to DIVISIon Bench) Act ORAL ORDER (Passed oh 13"“ May, 201 1) Per Sunll Kumar Slnha, J Heard on i A No 3/2011 an apphcat‘on for permISSIon to fl|e a joint, writ appeal. 2.‘ On due consideration I.A.No.3/2®11 is allowed and the i appellants are permitted to file this Jomt appeal 3. i Heard on IANo 2/2011 an application for exemption from flllng certifed copy of the order dated 1 10 2010 4. ; On due conSIderation IANo 2/2011 Is alloVTld and the appellants are exempted from fling certified copy of the above order. 5. i Heard on lANo 1/2011 an application for condonation of delay in filing the writ appeal 6. K On due consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the appellants and the grounds taken in the application, we are satisfied .that thewappellants have shown sufdcient cause for not filing‘the appeal in time and the delay in filing the appeal deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, l.A.No.v1/201.1 is aIIOWed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. 7. i Learned counsel appearing for the parties are alsoheard on admission. 8. This appeal is directed against the‘common order dated 1-10— 201‘0 passed in a batch of writ petitions. Against the said common order many writ appeals including Writ Appeal No 452/2010 were filed It is stated at the Bar that all the writ appeals fled against the commcn order have been dismissed by a Division Bench of thiS‘ Court by a common Judgment dated 19-4 2011 9[‘ Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that this appeal may also be dismissed/dispose of in terms of the common l judgment dated 19—4—2011 passed in Wirit Appeal No.452/2010 and other connected writ appeals V 10. In View of the above the present writ appeal Is dlsmlssed In L. terms of the common Judgment dated f19-4-2011 passed In abovef batch of writ appeals. Certified copy as per rules. ‘ Sd/- l l Q, SUNEKIMARSINHA Sd/~ Judge , t Radhe Shyam Sharma £ ‘ Judge Wc" i 3