1 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2897 OF 2010 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. Milind Deshmukh for the petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 22ND JUNE 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. This writ petition arises out of the entries made in the revenue records. It is settled principle of law that entries in the revenue records do not confer or take away any right of a person. If the petitioner apprehends that his rights would be affected on account of entries in the revenue records, it is open for the petitioner to establish his rights in an appropriate proceeding before the civil court. 2 3. With this observation, the writ petition is rejected summarily. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)