- 1 Paranand Netam Age about 50 years, Lecturer S/o Laie Sm Shiv Shingh Ne‘éam Govt. Primar Sch00§ Darba Block — Kurud, Distt.- Dhamtari (CG) Gomati Nage Age about 55 years, Lesturer D/o Shri Somnath Nage Govt. Hr. Sec. School Sirri Biock ~ Kurud Distt. -— Dhamtari (C.G.) Versus State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary Tribal & Education Depanment D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt. — Raipur (C) Distt. Education Officer Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) Bick Education Ofhcer Kurud, Distt. — Dhamtari (C.G.) 4 Treasury, Accounts & Pension, Distt. — Dhamt’ari (C5 .) WRIT PETiTiON NDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF ENDIA Appearance: Shri Somkant Verma, counsei for the petitioners. Shri Pradeep Singh, Pane! Lawyer for the State en advance copy‘ ORAL eRoER (29.1 2.2mm SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J Heard. Learned counsei for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioners are entitied to regular pay scale wet. the date of initial appointment or from the date of compietion of probation period. He submits that the issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabaipur in O.A. No.2745i89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. and others), wherein, it was heid that the similarly situated teachers are entitied to reguiar pay scaie wet. the date of initiai appointment. The HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARii, BiLAsPUR WP. (5) No. 7118 of 2007 PETITIONERS m y , G o RESPONDENTS 2 U o /\ matter was taken up to the Hon‘ble Supreme Court in Special’ Leave Petition (Civil) No.6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon’bie ' Supreme Court uphoiding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Aseistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment; Learned counsei for the petitioners further submits that this Court, w‘ while considering the same issue in Ram Kumar $ahu and others Vs. ‘ " State Govt. or Chhattisgarh and another (W.P.(S) No.813 or 2007) by order dated 12.2.2007, has granted regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. Learned counsel for the parties iointty submits that this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Ram Kumar Sahu and another (supra). in View of that, this petition is allowed in the same terms‘ However, this order shaii be subjeot to all verifications made by the State regarding facts pleaded in the petition Sd/— i Sunil Kumar Sinha l M vatti Judge