R-20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 542/2006 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Gautam Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Vibhu Shankar, Advcoate versus PANDIT MUNSHI RAM ASSOCIATES (PVT.)LTD & ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. D.Moitra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKUL MUDGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA 1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? % J U D G M E N T (Oral) MUKUL MUDGAL, J In view of the reasoning given in the order in the connected appeal being FAO (OS) No.318/2006, wherein similar issues have been raised, this appeal is also dismissed along with the connected appeal. A copy of the judgment in FAO(OS) No. 318/2006 will be kept on the file of this appeal. MUKUL MUDGAL,J VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J MAY 05, 2009/ib