IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2487 OF 1997 PETITION NO.2487 OF 1997 PETITION NO.2487 OF 1997 Upa-Abhiyanta, Yantriki & Anr. ... Petitioners Vs. Arun Shamrao Kasar ... Respondent Mr. A.P. Vanarase, A.G.P. for Petitioners. None for Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR, J. : J.P. DEVADHAR, J. : J.P. DEVADHAR, J. DATE DATE DATE : 22ND APRIL, 2008 : 22ND APRIL, 2008 : 22ND APRIL, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. :- :- :- 1. This petition is directed against the judgment dated 22nd July, 1996 passed by the Industrial Court, Kolhapur whereby the Complaint (U.L.P.) No.51 of 1991 filed by the respondent was partly allowed and the appellant was directed to confer the status of permanency and privileges of permanent employee to the respondent from the date of the Complaint. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners fairly states that the question raised in the present petition is squarely covered against the petitioners by the judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No.4141 of 2006, (The Dairy Manager, Government Milk Scheme, vs. Pandurang Sitaram 2 Jadhav) delivered on 10th July, 2007. The learned Counsel for the petitioners further states that the Letters Patent Appeal filed against the said decision is admitted and the same is pending. 3. In my view, the fact that the Letters Patents Appeal is pending cannot be a ground to adjourn the matter. So long as the aforesaid decision of the learned Single Judge is holding the field and in the absence of any decision to the contrary, judicial propriety demands that the decision of the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 4141 of 2006 ought to be followed. 4. Accordingly in the light of the aforesaid decision of this Court, the present Writ Petition is dismissed however with no order as to costs. ( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)