IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No: 25127 of 2008 Between: 1 Smt. P. V. Shobha, W/o. Sri P. Vijaya Kumar, R/o. 3-48-98, Sardarpatel Colony, Thirumalagiri Contonment Area, Ranga Reddy District. 2 Smt. S. Vijaya Lakshmi, W/o. S. Mallesham, R/o. H.No. 8-1-88, Karmanghat Village, L.B.Nagar Municipality, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Andhra pradesh, Department of Home, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner of Police, L.B.Nagar Zone, Cyberabad. 3 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District. 4 The Station House Officer, L.B.Nagar Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District. 5 The Station House Officer, Saroornagar Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District. 6 K. Subhash, S/o. Late K. Bala Veeraiah, R/o. H.No. 8-1-63, Karmanghat Village, L.B.Nagar Municipality, Ranga Reddy District. 7 Smt. K. Varalakshmi, W/o. Late K. Krishna, R/o. H.No. 8-1-63, Karmanghat Village, L.B.Nagar Municipality, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of respondents 1 to 5 in not taking any action on the complaints dated 18-02-2008, 26-08-2008 and 24-09-2008 to take action against respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and also to grant protection from the illegal activities of respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and also to grant protection from the illegal activities of respondent No.s 6 and 7 in respect of properties admeasuring 923 Sq. yards in sy.NO. 26/A and 15443.56 sq. yds in Sy.No. 28/AA of Jelleleguda Village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy Duistrict, as highly arbitrary, illegal, unjust, violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 21 ofthe Constitution of India and for issuance of a consequential direction to respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to forthwith take suitable action against respondent No.6 and 7 pursuant to the above said complaints and also grant protection to the petitioners from the illegal activities of respondent No.6 and 7 in respect of the above said property and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.SRINIVAS REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.25127 of 2008 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the inaction on the part of the respondents 1 to 5 in taking action on the complaints of the petitioners dated 18-02-2008, 26-08-2008 and 24-09-2008 is arbitrary and illegal. The petitioner also sought a further direction to the respondents 1 to 5 to provide protection from the alleged illegal activities of the respondents 6 and 7 in respect of the properties admeasuring 923 square yards in Sy.No.26/A and 15443.56 sq. yards in Sy.No.28/AA of Jellellaguda Village, Saoornagar Mandal, R.R. District. According to the petitioners, the possession of the above said property was handed over to them in execution of the decree for partition in O.S.No.24 of 1997 on the file of the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, R.R. District. When the matter is taken up for consideration, it is brought to my notice by the learned counsel for the petitioner that after filing this writ petition, having entertained the complaints lodged by the petitioners, F.I.R.No.1033 of 2008 was registered on the file of the L.B.Nagar Police Station on 25-10-2008 for the offences punishable under Section 447 and 506 IPC and the investigation is in progress. Hence without expressing any opinion as to the correctness of the allegations made in the complaints, it is left open to the respondents 1 to 5 to proceed with the investigation following due process of law. So far as the other part of the prayer relating to the protection sought by the petitioners against the alleged illegal activities of the respondents 6 and 7 is concerned, since the representations made by the petitioners, the latest being on 24-09-2008 have admittedly been received by the respondents 1 to 5, there shall be a direction to the respondents 1 to 5 to consider the request of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 15-11-2008 KLP