THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 17868 of 2011 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana) Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing for the respondent bank. Questioning the action of the respondent bank in seeking to evict them from the mortgaged property, the petitioners filed the present writ petition and they seek directions to the respondent not to take any coercive steps against them. Admittedly, the petitioners have earlier moved this Court by way of writ petition being W.P. No. 8985 of 2011, challenging the action of the respondent bank in initiating proceedings under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, for taking possession of the subject property. This Court, in view of the representation made by the counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are ready and willing to clear off the debt due to the respondent bank, disposed of the said writ petition, on 06.04.2011, directing the petitioners to deposit the entire overdue amount, within a period of three weeks from the date of order. On such deposit, the respondent bank was directed to regularize the account of the petitioners within four weeks thereafter, and till such time not to take any coercive steps against the petitioners. The petitioners admittedly have not paid the entire due amount in pursuance of the said order and only paid part of it, and filed the present writ petition, stating that the respondent bank is not considering their request to grant some more time to pay the balance amount and is proceeding further in the matter. This Court, on 29.06.2011, while issuing notice before admission and adjourning the matter by one week, passed interim orders that no coercive steps shall be taken by the respondent till then. At the hearing, the counsel for the respondent bank submits that the petitioners have not paid the balance loan amount till date. The conduct of the petitioners in not complying with the orders of this Court passed earlier and again filing the present writ petition and seeking intervention of the Court with the action of the respondent bank in proceeding further in the matter, is nothing but abuse of process of Court and the petitioners are not entitled to any relief much less the relief sought by them. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _____________ N.V. RAMANA, J _________________ P. DURGA PRASAD, J 4th August 2011 IBL