IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BAIL) NOS. 227 & 228 OF 2010. Shri Siddhant Kashyap, through ..... Applicant next friend Darshan Kashyap Versus State through Public Prosecutor and anr., ..... Respondents Shri Arun Bras De Sa, Advocate for the Appellant Shri C.A. Ferreira, Public Prosecutor for the Respondents. Coram:- N.A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 26TH October, 2010. P.C. Heard. These are bail applications filed on behalf of the accused who has been charged u/s 394, 397 & section 3 read with section 25 and 27 of the Arms Act in respect of two incidents which took place on 23rd March, 2010 and 30th March, 2010. Charge has already been framed in both the cases. Shri Ferreira, learned Public Prosecutor upon instructions of the Investigating Officer submits that in the first case 2 witnesses have been examined. In the second case, 12 witnesses have been examined. As regards the victim in the first case, the learned Public Prosecutor states that as many 61 pellets had been removed from the back of the victim. The main witness has not been examined in the case arising from the second incident. 2. Shri Arun Bras De Sa, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent/Accused submits that the accused is about 19 years of age and was victim of movie which he saw and tried to imitate what he had seen in the movie. In both the cases the victims have suffered injuries on account of firing of a country made 12 bore pistol by the Accused. There is primafacie evidence as regards the implication of the accused in the offence committed by him. The offences are serious and an offence u/s 394 can be punished with imprisonment for life or with 10 years and fine. Although it is submitted that the Accused/Applicant was a school going student, this statement is contested on behalf of the Respondent by stating that the applicant/accused had not attended the school in the last academic year during which the offences were committed. 3. Considering the facts of the case, in my view, this is not a fit case to grant bail to the accused at this stage. 4. The bail applications are hereby dismissed. N.A. BRITTO, J. ars