IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA SECOND APPEAL NO. 31 OF 2008 SHRI. ANTONIO CLEMENTE FERNANDES AND ANR., ... Appellants Versus SMT. FILOMENA CHAGAS FERNANDES AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Sudin M. S. Usgaonkar, Advocate for the Appellants. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 3rd April, 2008 P.C.:- Heard Mr. Sudin Usgaonkar, learned Counsel on behalf of the Appellants. The Appellants herein were the Plaintiffs in R.C.S. No.163/95 filed on 26-7-1995. The Plaintiffs purchased a property by sale deed dated 20-7-1972. No area was mentioned on the said sale deed. Presumably, the survey took place thereafter. The dispute is as regards a portion of 61 sq. meters. The Defendants purchased 237 sq. meters by sale deed dated 10-2-1984. At the time of the survey the disputed portion of 61 sq. meters was not shown as part of the property of the Plaintiffs surveyed under no.10/12 but was shown as part of Defendants property surveyed under no.10/10. The learned trial Court observed that the Plaintiffs had examined four witnesses but their evidence was unreliable. The learned first appellate Court also held that the Plaintiffs had failed to establish that the suit plot admeasuring 61 sq. meters was an integral part of survey no.10/12 and that it was in their possession and enjoyment. In other words, both the Courts below have given concurrent findings of fact that the disputed plot admeasuring 61 sq. meters is not in possession of the Plaintiffs and does not form part of the property purchased by them by sale deed dated 20-7-1972. These are concurrent findings of fact. No question of law much less a substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. Second Appeal is dismissed in limine. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.