IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2598 of 2009 SHASHI BHUSHAN PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 26.02.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the Union of India. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ application is that even though a loan under the scheme of "Prime Minister Rojgar Yojna" (P.M.R.Y.) was sanctioned in his favour on 20.3.2008 under the order of Branch Manager of Union Bank of India, Pagranawada Branch, P.O-Dalsingsarai, District-Samastipur, the payment thereof in full has not been made. The petitioner says that he was entitled for release of Rs. 2,00,000/- where as he has been given only a sum of Rs. 33,500/- and therefore the Bank is required to release the balance amount of Rs. 1,66,500/-. There is nothing on record to show that the petitioner was sanctioned a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- and at least the sanction letter dated 20.3.2008 also not disclose this fact. That being so, this Court without expressing any opinion of such claim of the petitioner would only give him liberty to approach the said Branch Manager of Union Bank of India who had issued the sanction letter of the loan in favour of the petitioner. - 2 - The said Branch Manager thereafter will examine the grievance of the petitioner and dispose it of by a reasoned order. It goes without saying that if the petitioner fulfills the requisite condition for grant of loan, the amount he is entitled to if any, would also be released within a period of one month from the date of passing of such order by the Branch Manager. With the aforementioned observations and directions this application is disposed of. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)