IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 358 of 2008 Date of Decision: 6.8.2010 Parshotam Kumar Narang and others .....Petitioners Versus Y.S. Ratra ….Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Shri Rajiv Atam Ram, Senior Advocate, with Shri Saurabh Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. Shri P.S. Thiara, Advocate, for the respondents. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) Shri P.S. Thiara, learned counsel for the respondents states that the directions issued by this Court, have been complied with. However, Shri Rajiv Atma Ram, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioners, disputes the said assertion and states that the directions issued by this Court have not been complied with in respect of petitioner Nos. 1, 8 and 9. Learned counsel for the petitioners, however, wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to challenge the action of the Punjab Electricity Board in not grant deemed date of promotion to petitioner Nos. 1, 8 and 9 in appropriate proceedings, in accordance with law. Allowed as prayed for. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. Rule is discharged. [HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 6.8.2010 ds