(g 3 Cfilmyi SWELE IBENW IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.s. No. 580?? /10 Dilraj Sing Tanwar, S/o Shri Nepal Sing Tanwar aged about 53 years, Lab Attendant, Gramya Bhariti Vidyapith, Hardi Bazar, Korba (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretary, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Higher Education, Directorate Raipur (C.G.) 3. Shashtri Shikshan Sarniti, Through its Secretary,Gramya Bharti Vidyapith (Mahavidyalaya) Hardi Bazar, Korba (C.G.) ‘ RESPONDENTS 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE INDIA / (ffiigtrfx\ , 7 ,, w m (7 $ M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA$PUR an : Hon’BLE smu Jus'rxcE pRmNKER DIWAKER mp4s n . I PETmONER Versus RESFONDENTS ! o. 5802;2010 Dikaj Sing Tanwai Statc of (LG. 8r, Others N‘ Shn' Neeraj Choubey, counsel for the petitione. Shri V.V.S.M001ihy, Dy. A.G. for the State/resps. 1 6a 2. ORDER (07.10.20 10) io m o d o Grievance of the petitner in the psent petition is that he is the employee f Go§ernment Aided private educational institution and though he is entitle for the benem of 6th Pay Commissin as recommended by the Government for the government employees but the same has not een given to b him. According o the petitioner earlier also when the benefit of 5*11 Pay Commission was refused to petitior and similarly placed yersons} writ petitions were nied before this Court and ultimately after passing of onier by this Court the benent of 5th Pay Commission was granted to them. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that ends of justice would be served if at this stage the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition and direction be issued to the respondent No.1 for deciding 1116 pending representation of the petitioner (Annexure P15) dated 11.6.2610. 3. Counsel appearing for the State submits that the‘r , representation has been made'by the petitioner directly to the p Chief Minister Whereas he is required to make suitable representation to respondent NO. 1. He submits that the case of J; WRIT PETITION UNQER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTI’L OF INDIA r t ne 7M the petitioner and similarly placed persons for grant of 6th Pay Commission is already under consideration and lat th€ petitioner make a fresh rcpmsentation and the samo would be decided in accordance with law. 4. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty, In the eventuality of iiling a fresh representation by the petitioner before the respondent NO.1 Within a period of one month fmm the date of receipt of copy of this order, it is expected from the said authorities to pass appropliate order as expeditiously as possible pmferabiy within a period of four months &om the date of its receipt. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge ”