L ‘ N Writ PEtiton o. 1339 of 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH : BILASPUR i N Petitioner Versus Education, Raipur (C.G.) Distt. Rapur (C.G.) Kumari Roshani Chandrak6r, Aged about - 17 ear, D/o Shri rishna Kumar Chanaker, R/o Village — Jamgaon —® Tah. Gur€1iei, Distt. urg (C.G.) RespodentS ‘ Secretaly; Chhattisgarh Board of Secondaxy i ‘ WRIT PEIIIIQQER ARTICLE 226 OF THE ’‘’‘igg CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: H‘on’ble Shrj Satish K. Agnihotri J.) h eEe None for te pu‘onr. r , fo Sbi H. B. Agarwal, Senior Advocate with Shri Pankaj Agalwal Advocate r the respondent. (Passed on th 14th Day ofugust, 2008) he matter is called for hearing twice. On both the occasons, none appeaxs nor any representation is made on ehalf of te petitiner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. In View of the abov, the petitin is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn' Judge Raju 9? ys K dr dih D n O R D E R is A T i b h o e o