CRM No. M-18576 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. M-18576 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.07.2009 Suman @ Babu ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Ram Pal Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Rajan Gupta, J. This is a petition seeking regular bail in a case registered against the petitioner under Sections 395, 397, 342, 412, 216, 120-B IPC and 25/54/59 of Arms Act, at Police Station Civil Lines, Sonepat, vide FIR No.181 dated 5th July, 2008. The allegations in the FIR are that on the night intervening 4th/5th July, 2008, 5-6 persons entered in the house of the complainant carrying knives and pistol and took away cash and jewelry. They also gave injuries to the father of the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that petitioner is not named in the FIR and has been implicated merely on the basis of suspicion. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and given careful thought to the facts of the case. A bail application was earlier moved by the petitioner CRM No. M-18576 of 2009 2 before the court of Sessions at Sonepat. The same was dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge, as it came to the conclusion that there was allegation of direct involvement of the petitioner in the crime. The prosecution revealed before the said court that Suman @ Babu, who was a resident of Bangladesh, the petitioner herein, had actively participated in the commission of crime. In view of the seriousness of the allegations against the petitioner, I do not find it a fit case for enlarging him on bail. The question of parity with another accused Abdul Rasid, has already been dealt with by the court below. It was found that allegation against co-accused Abdul Rasit was only that he was a part of the conspiracy. However, allegations against the petitioner is of direct involvement in the commission of crime. I thus find no ground to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner. The petition is devoid of merit. The same is hereby dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE July 16, 2009 'rajpal'