IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2010 / 19TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 21136 of 2009(Q) -------------------------- CRIME NO.783/2002 OF PERUMBAVOOR POLICE STATION PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SARASAMMA VARGHESE, AGED 61 YEARS W/O. LAGE T.M.VARGHESE,THOMPARA HOUSE, IRINGOL, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.UDAYABHANU RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBI, SCB CHENNAI REP. BYTHE STANDING COUNCEL FOR CBI HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.M.V.S.NAMBOOTHIRY,SC, C.B.I. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ................................. W.P.(c).No.21136 of 2009 .................................... Dated: 09.06.2010 JUDGMENT Heard both sides. 2. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who is the widow of one T.M.Varghese @ Malankara Varghese seeks a direction to the respondent CBI to conduct a proper and expeditious investigation of RC 8(S)/ 2007/CBI/SCB/Chennai arising out of Crime No.783/2002 of Perumbavoor Police Station. 3. The learned Standing Counsel for the CBI submitted that the CBI has already filed a final report before the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Ernakulam on 7.5.2010 charge-sheeting 19 accused persons. If so, the petitioner cannot have any surviving grievance in the matter. 4. Recording the said submission of the learned Standing Counsel, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Now that the petitioner has filed a petition before the committal court namely Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam raising his objection as to why the final report should not be accepted he can raise all his contentions before that Court. Dated this the 9th day of June, 2010. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj