FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1240 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 1240 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 1240 OF 2006 IN IN IN REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION (St.) NO. 8759 of 2005 PETITION (St.) NO. 8759 of 2005 PETITION (St.) NO. 8759 of 2005 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 5874 OF 200 PETITION NO. 5874 OF 200 PETITION NO. 5874 OF 2002 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri R.K.Mendadkar for the petitioner. Shri C.R.Sonawane AGP for State. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & SMT. SMT. SMT. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. DTAED: DTAED: DTAED: 25TH APRIL,2006 25TH APRIL,2006 25TH APRIL,2006. P.C. 1. Heard Shri Mendadkar for the petitioner and Shri Sonawane for the Respondent. 2. For reasons mentioned in Civil Application, application is allowed. The delay is condoned. Civil Application accordingly disposed of. In In In R.P.(St.)NO. 8759 of 2005 R.P.(St.)NO. 8759 of 2005 R.P.(St.)NO. 8759 of 2005 3. Heard. For reasons mentioned in the Review Petition, review petition is allowed. Petition is restored to file. In In In W.P. NO. 5874 OF 2002 W.P. NO. 5874 OF 2002 W.P. NO. 5874 OF 2002 4. By consent of parties, the matter is taken up for hearing immediately today. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the committee erred in holding the petitioner as Scheduled Tribe belonging to Halba-Koshti category. Factually this is done by the committee after considering the entire evidence on record. The Learned AGP opposed the petition contending that the findings are properly recorded. 5. The para 3 of the order at page 30 clearly states that the petitioner belongs to Scheduled Tribe. Whatever happens to the judgment in W.P. 2944/84 the finding that the petitioner belongs to Scheduled Tribe cannot be touched. Hence petition is disposed of. ...