1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R 1. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.2482/2009 Jitendra Pakar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.3000/2009 Komal Lata Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 3. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.3451/2009 Manju Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 4. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.3453/2009 Buddhiprakash Meena & Ors. Vs. State & Ors. 5. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.3454/2009 Himani Bhatia Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 6. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.3871/2009 Mudita Paliwal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 7. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.2479/2009 Shri Niwas Mahawar & Ors Vs. State & Ors. 8. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.2898/2009 Basant Lal Bamaniya Vs. State & Ors. 9. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.7472/2009 Shiksha Pawan & Ors. Vs. State & Ors. 10. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.7047/2009 Ms Mariyam Banoo Vs. State & Ors. 11. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.3636/2009 Dr. Gopi Lal Mahawar Vs. State & Ors. 12. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.3912/2009 Arvind Kumar Sharma Vs. State & Ors. 13. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.4243/2009 Dr. Suresh Mehra Vs. State & Ors. 2 14. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.4244/2009 Shyam Lal Bairwa Vs. State & Ors. 15. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.4735/2009 Brijesh Jangid & Ors. Vs. State & Ors. 16. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.5066/2009 Mrs. Sheelu Gupta Vs. State & Ors. 17. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.5067/2009 Dr. Priti Saxena Vs. State & Ors. 18. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.5279/2009 Dr. Sumanlata & Anr. Vs. State & Ors. Date of Order : : : 1.7.2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain ] Mr. R. P. Vijay ] Mr. Deendayal Khandelwal ] Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma ] Mr. Sudhir Jain ] Mr. Praveen Sharma for the petitioners. Mr. Dinesh Yadav, AAG for the State. Issue notice to the respondents in SBCWP No.7472/2009 & No.7047/2009. Shri Dinesh Yadav, AAG accepts notices for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted that controversy raised in this matter is squarely covered by judgment of Coordinate Bench of this Court in a batch of petitions, main judgment being rendered in 3 Ms. Savita Samriya Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : SB Civil Writ Petition No.5238/2009 on 22.5.2009. It is contended that aforesaid petitions were allowed and the termination of petitioners was held to be arbitrary and illegal and the respondents were restrained from appointing substitute College Lecturers for the academic session 2009-2010 against the vacancies for which the petitioners were appointed and were directed to reconsider the claim of petitioners on priority basis for the academic session for 2009-2010 and pass appropriate orders. It was however directed that petitioner shall not be entitled to emoluments as fixed amount as referred in the appointment letter for the period of respective colleges for summer vacation and further that they would be entitled to be paid from the date of their joining as per the order of continuation/fresh appointment in the next academic session 2009-2010. Learned counsel submitted that petitioners were engaged during the academic session 2008-2009 and that in terms of aforesaid judgment they are entitled to continue against the vacancies in which they were continued till fresh appointment was not made through RPSC. In all these writ petitions except in SBCWP No.7472/2009 & No.7047/2009, which is freshly filed, there 4 is a direction to the respondents to continue the petitioners on the post of Lecturer. Learned counsel for the respondents though has opposed the writ petition. He is however not in position to distinguish the present matters from the judgment rendered by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Ms. Savita (supra). The controversy thus is squarely covered by aforesaid judgment. The writ petitions are, therefore, disposed of in terms of aforesaid judgment with the direction that all the petitioners shall be continued on the post of Lecturer in terms of the aforesaid judgment passed by this Court and the directions contained in para No.16 of the judgment shall be mutatis-mutandis be applied in the case of petitioners too. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/-