RSA 2253 of 2006 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. RSA 2253 of 2006 Date of decision:- 29.10.2009 Kundan Singh appellant vs Chaman Lal Respondent Present: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate Mr. Kanwaljit Singh,Sr.Advocate with Mr. Arvinder Singh, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. Vide order dated 14.2.2008, with the consent of counsel for both the parties, a direction was given to Tehsildar, Dera Baba Nanak to get the demarcation conducted of khasra Nos. 163 and 164 to determine if the disputed land falls in the said khasra numbers or it was situated in the abadi area. Pursuant to the said order, demarcation has been conducted by the Tehsildar and a report has been prepared on 13.4.2008. The suit of the plaintiff-appellant for injunction though was decreed by the trial court but the same has been dismissed by the lower appellate court holding that the suit land forms a part of khasra nos. 163 and 164. I have heard learned counsel for both the parties and gone through the report of the Tehsildar, Dera Baba Nanak, wherein on demarcation it has been determined that khasra no. 163 measuring 7 marlas and khasra No.164 measuring 9 marlas belonged to Chaman Lal RSA 2253 of 2006 2 defendant-respondent and haveli of the plaintiff- appellant Kundan Singh is situated in a different plot. In view of the report of the Tehsildar, I do not find any infirmity in the order passed by the lower appellate court dismissing the suit of the plaintiff-appellant regarding injunction. No substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed. However, it is clarified that the house/haveli, which has been reported to be existing beyond khasra nos.163 and 164 will not be interfered by the defendant-respondent and the parties will be bound by the demarcation report of the Tehsildar, to which they had not raised any objection. The report of the Tehsildar is made part of the record. October 29 ,2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) TSM JUDGE