IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Contempt Petition No.320 of 2009 Kushal Singh, S/o Maidar Singh Rawat, R/o Village Banali Patti Raika, District Tehri Garhwal. ……Petitioner. Versus Mulayam Singh Rajput presently posted as Executive Engineer Provincial Divisional, P.W.D. New Tehri, District Tehri Garhwal. …….Respondent. Mr.D.C.S. Rawat, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, Brief Holder for the respondent. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this contempt petition, the petitioner has prayed to punish the respondent for flouting the order dated 02-12-2008 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 1204 of 2008 (S/S), Kushal Singh Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others. In the said writ petition, the direction was given to the respondent No.3 i.e. Executive Engineer, Provincial Division, P.W.D. Narendra Nagar, District Tehri Garhwal to consider the representation of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified coy of this order along with fresh representation. In response, affidavit of compliance has been filed by the respondent wherein it is stated in para No. 4 to the affidavit of compliance that the representation of the petitioner had 2 already been decided by the respondent on 02-09-2009, the compliance order has been annexed as annexure No. CA-5 to the affidavit of compliance. In view of the fact, that the order has been complied with, the contempt petition is liable to be dismissed. The same is dismissed. Notices issued against the respondent are hereby discharged. However, if the petitioner feels aggrieved and if so advised, he may assail the order passed by the respondent before appropriate forum as provided under the law available to the petitioner. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. (B.S.Verma, J.) 19-07-2010 MK