WP(C) 557/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Mr. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present wri t petition was filed challenging the action on the part of the respondent author ities for not appointing the petitioner as constable in Central Reserve Police F orce (CRPF) on the assumption that he was not selected for non submission of the Annexure-3 Hillman Certificate. However, according to the learned counsel for t he petitioner after filing of the affidavit-in-opposition by the CRPF it has com e to the knowledge of the petitioner that his case for appointment was not rejec ted on the ground of non submission of such certificate but on the ground that h e was found not medically fit by the CRPF Medical Board for which he was not app ointed. Mr. Sarma, learned counsel, therefore, submits that since in the present writ pe tition the petitioner has not challenged the action of the respondent authoritie s for declaring him medically unfit he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petit ion with liberty to challenge the said action of the respondent authorities decl aring the petitioner as medically unfit. Prayer is allowed. The writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal.