HI6H CCVRT OF CHHATraseARH AT BILASPUR &IVISION BENCH CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JAffDISH BHAOA, Ag C.J. HON'BLE SHRI T.P. SHARMA, J. Appellonts ^•' Respondente Writ ADpeal No.310/2007 1. Balram Chakradhari, S/o Pusu Chakradhori, Aged about 36 yrs 2. Kaliram Nishad, S/o Chaitram Nishad, Aqed about 32 years 3. Rama Verma, S/o Firtu Verma, A9ed about 55 years All R/o Villa9e - Tulsi, Post Office - DamakhedQ, Tohsil - SimgQ, Distt. Raipur (C©) Versus 1. Stote of Chhattisgorh Throu9h ; Secretary Department of Home E>KS Bhawon, Shastri Chowk, Raipur (C©) 2. Collector, Raipur District - Raipur (C6) 3. Superintendent of Police, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C©) 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Sim9Q, &istt. Raipur (C0) 5. Ram Khilowan Turkane, A^ed dbout 45 years, Sarpanch &ram Panchoyat Tulsi, R/o \/MOQC - Tulsi PS Sim9a, Distt Raipur (C$5 6. Avinash Dos, A^ed dtout 44 yecrs Member of N090? Panchoyat, Simga Distt. Raipur (C6) 7. BhQgboli, S/o Purushottam , A9ed about 38 years, Occupation - Contractor, R/o Viila9e - Raweli, Tohsil - Bemetara, Distt Durg (C©) ^€-' Writ Appeal underSection 2 (1) oftheChhatti$qarh Hiqh Court (Appeal to Division Beneh) Act 2006 read uvith Ruie l57fl0) of the Chhattisciarh Hioh Court Rules 2005 r Prosent : None for the appellant, Shri AS Kaehhciwiha, fioverrwient Advocate for the State. ORAL JUD^AENT (16th Janucuy, 2008) The followin9 jud9ment of the Court wos delivered by Hon'ble Jcgdish Bholta,Ag C.J. This appeal arises out of the impi^ned order dated 13 November , 2007, whereby learned Sin9le Jud9e has dismissed the petition on the ground that the second writ petition for the some relief i3 not maintainable. It is settled law that second writ petition is not maintainable. From the perusat of the jud9ment in question, we find that the petitioner / appellant initially filed a public interest liti9ation, which was disposed of. It appears thot the petitioner / appeliant was not satisfied and chooses to file another writ petition instead of filing Special Leave Appeal before the Apex Court. Time and cigain, huntin9 of Benches has been deprecated. Even in the case in hond, same thin9 has been happened. Accordin9ly, no interference is warranted and the writ appeal is dismissed. -A___— Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice padma Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge