CWP No. 6302 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 6302 of 2009 Date of Decision: April 27, 2009 Atma Ram ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. R.M.Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. The petitioner is aggrieved by the recording of adverse remarks regarding integrity in his Annual Confidential Report. The primary argument of learned counsel for the petitioner is that these adverse remarks have emanated from a verbal complaint made with the DIG of the range and that in fact there is no basis for the same. In my opinion it would not be possible for this Court to come to a conclusion regarding the existence or non-existence of the basis in extraordinary jurisdiction. It is to be noticed that every ACR goes through three stages viz. reporting officer, reviewing officer and the accepting officer. This three tier process has been put into place only to obviate any CWP No. 6302 of 2009 2 arbitrary grading of an official. Apart from this the petitioner has moved representations right up to the level of the Government and the same have been rejected. In the circumstances this writ petition is dismissed. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE April 27, 2009 sunita