THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU APPEAL SUIT No. 1 of 2007 & ASMP No.567 of 2011 JUDGMENT: 1. This Appeal Suit, by the appellant/3rd plaintiff, is directed against the Judgment and Decree, dated 07.11.2006 in Original Suit No.26 of 1999 on the file of the IV Additional District Judge, Tirupati, whereunder and whereby the suit filed by the appellants and the respondents 1 and 2 herein for partition of plaint ‘A’ and ‘B’ schedule properties, was decreed and a preliminary decree was passed. 2. Heard both sides. 3. It is stated by both the counsel that during pendency of the appeal, the parties have entered into a compromise in respect of the subject matter of the suit. Both parties filed A.S.M.P. No.567 of 2011 praying to record the compromise and pass a decree in terms of the compromise memo. 4. Both the parties are present in the court. They are identified by their respective counsel. The parties stated that the matter has been settled between the parties in terms of the compromise memo filed along with the petition, whereunder it is agreed between the parties that in the plaint ‘A’ schedule, the second plaintiff will get an extent of Ac.4.51 cents of land, the third plaintiff will get an extent of Ac.2.54 cents of land, and the defendant will get an extent of Ac.7.36 cents of land, and the plaint ‘B’ schedule property was settled in favour of the defendant. Therefore, there is no impediment for recording the compromise between the parties. Accordingly, A.S.M.P. is ordered. 5. The Appeal Suit is disposed of decreeing the suit in terms of the compromise memo filed by both the parties. No costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 30.03.2011 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU APPEAL SUIT No. 1 of 2007 & ASMP No.567 of 2011 30.3.2011 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU APPEAL SUIT No. 1 of 2007 & ASMP No.567 of 2011 30.3.2011 Between: D.Madhusudhan Reddy …Appellant And D.Ranga Reddy (died) & others …Respondents