IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37431 of 2010 NAGMANI MAHTO SON OF JAI PRAKASH MAHTO. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 4 25.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner has been made accused under section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant alleged that while they were getting their cows grazed in Mosrile bandh (dam), two persons came armed with pistol. The informant identified one of them as Nagmani of village Kumbhi. The informant further alleged that both the persons opened fire at Doman Yadav, who fell down and died on the spot. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that post mortem report shows one injury. The petitioner is in custody since 2.7.2009. The State submits that after charge three to four witnesses have been examined. Having regard to the nature of allegation I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. However, the trial Court is directed expedite the trial so as to conclude the same preferably within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Devendra/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)