IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 10856 of 2008. Decided on: 21 st December, 2010. Neera. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No ________________________________________________________ __ For the petitioner. : Mr. Lalit Sehgal, Advocate vice Mr. Peeyush Verma, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent No. 3. : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For respondent No. 4. : Mr. Lokender Thakur, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner has already made representations for the redressal of her grievance to the competent authority vide Annexures P-3 and P-4, dated 7.06.2003 and 09.07.2003, respectively. However, the same have not been decided till date. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 1, i.e., Secretary (Education), Government of Himachal Pradesh to decide the representations made by the petitioner on 07.06.2003 and 09.07.2003, Annexures P-3 & P-4 by passing a speaking order, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No Judge December 21, 2010. (bhupender)