9-S. ^^ :.M ::n%^f^^^^^ -^^^^^j@ ?"^-S-?a'^^i^%?i ^^^S^'s?i^^K^. ^^.•^?^^^^T'^^^^ ^•^^ S^^S^^i '£i^iS'S?<siS%%:s«iU(: s^: 1 K^s?S:'A^;^ BSSIKBS c 'i^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE CAHHTTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. N0———————3£l^...........OF 2004 PETITIONER:- RESPONDENTS:-1 GHANSHYAM DHRUWA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/0 late Shri Bharosi Ram Dhruwa OCCUPATION^OINT COLLECTOR DISTRICT-DHAMTARI VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH THEPRINCIPAL SECRETARY GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT; SECRETARIATDAU KALYAN SINGHBHAWAN ; RAIPUR (C.G.) SHRIB.M.TANDON; COMMISSIONRER -CUM- ENQUIRY OFFICER; DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY MAHANADI DIVISION MANTRALAY, RAIPUR (C.G.) SHRI I.S.AGARWAL DEPUTf COLLECTOR DISTRICT BASTER; JAGDALPUR (C.G.) £^v ^JA^ &OT^ri\xI AADoeaia _ ^ \ BHA1>ATA«ICG / 'CG.;02^ ^, <^— 3hi? Ehowk, Ramsagar Para, DHAHTARI (C.G.)p235139 i^ '%SKK^ @s^z!^^-';'ffsyssss' ^WiiSKwiiSSS. WW^iS ^^ ^^-l^ M'Tk!S^ ^SKMSQ •!~"i-:;^i;yi;S3 iiii wi&s i^S aliSi%^i mm-^ .tii Q^M 30^3E .,f.^s^ ,';a-'/ .^' r^^T TT3 T OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER RESPONDENTS WMT PETmON No. 2014 of2004 Ghanshvam Dhmwa. VERSUS State ofCbAattisearh & PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 READ \\7TTH ARTICLE 20f2) OF THE .CONSTTTLJTIONOFINDIA • SB: Hon'Ue Shn_Satish K. Assmhotri, 3. ^-S^S"'"' • . ^ 1 is&i./j Shii C.R.Sahu. Advocate forthe petitioner. Sliri N.N.Rov, Paiicl Lav>'\'er for the State. (Passed on 02°" day of December, 2009 teaSg^tBSi,. yafss"-:-"'"^- [,A.No. 6. Tliis is an application for withdrawal ofthe writ petition, on the grounds stated therein. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. It is ordered as prayed for. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdt'awn. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge