IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2047 of 2011 INDRAJEET PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 25.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioner has been made accused in a kidnapping case registered under sections 364A and 386/34 of the IPC. Although petitioner is named in the first information report and in course of investigation some witnesses stated about involvement of the petitioner but subsequently, Investigating officer incorporates at para 20 of the case diary that there was some inconsistency between the statement of the informant and as per oral direction of the Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi, he took the charge of investigation and thereafter the statement of the victim was recorded under section 164 of the Cr.P.C. in which he sates the names of other accused persons and so far as petitioner is concerned, he has stated nothing against him. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the petitioner was made accused in kidnapping case and on the basis of the above stated antecedent, first Investigating officer framed the petitioner in this case. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Indrajeet Paswan, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction - 2 - of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in Sonbarsa P.S. Case no. 29/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)