u {$H COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT !LASPUR ‘W.P. No. 7&6 6f 2001 JRIT PETITION UNDER ART!¢LE 226!227 OF THE C6NSTITUTION OF lNDiA Hon ble Shn Satiai‘ i’ Agmho n J Thakur hn S. R. J. Jeiswai, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri S. K. Miehra. Pane! Lawyer for the respondents Ne. 1 and 2. ORAL CRDER (Passed on this 28‘“ day of November, 2007) . Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner, en instructi6ne“, submits that the petition has become infructueue', - 2. Learned couneei appearing for the respondents/state has no objection to the above submission made by teamed counsei for the petitioner. 3. in View of the above. t. e petition is dismiesed as having become B S Petitioner Mls Lioyds Finance Llmxted ‘bompany m-corporated under the Companies Act head offce at Raheja Centre, Nanman Pomt Mumbai. ~ Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the ' District Magistrate Durg. 2. The Station House Officer. Police Station Bhilai nagar Kotwaii $eetor Vi BhiiaiDIstnct Durg Kailash Chard Josh: S/o Not known ReSIdentof ecto. Vi Bniiai Diatnct Burg. ' infructuous. i ‘i Sdl- I Vii V: Satish K.Agnihotri L- Judge ep