@ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BILASPUR Civii Revision No.109^2007 Singie Bench: Hon'bSe Shri DISip RaosaSieb Deshmukh, J. ADplicanf Non-apRijcants 1. 2. Jugen Bal, , wife of Shri Prem Sai, aged about 37 years, resident of vilJage - Chhattarpur, Tahsii - Surajpur, P.S. Ambikapur, Distl:. Sarguja (CG) Versus Yespal, aged about 12 years, son of late Ram Prasad. Nlkeshwar, aged about 7 years, son ofLateRamprasad. Both are minors, through - naturai guardian - Uncie (Chacha), Shiv Prasad, son of Budhram, aged about 40 years, occupation- agricuiture, resident of viliage - Chhattarpur, P.S. Ambikapaur, Distt. Sarguja (CG) CIyilRevisjonynder^ectiQn 115 ofthe Civil Procedure Code. 1908. Present:- Shri Vinay Pandey, counsei for the appiicant. ORALORQm (Passed on 17th September, 2007) Heard on i.A. No.1 for condonation ofdeiay. (2) Brief facts are that the appllcant had withdrawn second appeal No.393/2003 on 17.1.2007 vvith iiberty to file civli revision. Second appeai was dismissed as withdrawn reserving the aforesaid iiberty. Present revision was fiied on 11 .9.2007 and is grossly barred by iimitation. (3) Learned counsel for the appiicant has submitted that the appiicant was inadvertently pprsuing a remedy before a wrong forum and after withdrawing the second appeal, has fiied the civii revision. Be as it may, the ii!IF'"l -^ Priya fact remains that the second appeai was witndrawn on 17.1.2007. Even if this date Is to be reckoned, the revision having been filed on 11.9.2007 is grossly barred by limitation and no cause much less sufficient is shown in the appiication for condonation of delay in flling this clvil revision. (4) In the absence of the any expianation for the delay, !.A. No.1 for condonation of deiay in filing this civil revision is dismissed. As a result, this civil revision is also dismissed as barred by limltation. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge I.