THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 457 of 2010 Between: S.P. Manjula …… Petitioner and Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Rep. by its Commissioner, Hyderabad & others ….. Respondents O R D E R: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Corporation. At the first instance, the petitioner approached this Court by filing Writ Petition No. 7233 of 2007 seeking a declaration that the action of the respondent Corporation in not taking any steps on the illegal and unauthorized constructions being made by the 5th respondent herein in house bearing D.No. 4-1-247, situated at Hanuman Tekdi, Troop Bazar, Hyderabad, as illegal and arbitrary. Pending the same, he filed Writ Petition No. 4047 of 2008 with a similar prayer. This Court by order dated 28.02.2008 in W.P.M.P.No. 5287 of 2008 directed the respondent Corporation to forthwith stop the construction of the unauthorized structures in the above said premises. Complaining violation of the said order, the petitioner filed Contempt Case No. 338 of 2008, which was dismissed by recording the statement that pursuant to the order under contempt, the answering respondent had demolished the deviated structures made by the 5th respondent herein. Subsequently, by an order dated 09.09.2008, Writ Petition No. 4047 of 2008 was also disposed of directing the respondent Corporation to complete the process of removal of unauthorized constructions made by the unofficial respondent after disposal of the application filed under B.P.S. Again the petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 26392 of 2009 for the same relief. During the pendency of this Writ Petition, this Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 7233 of 2007 on 21.10.2009 recording the submission that the illegal constructions in the premises in question were removed. In view of the same, Writ Petition No. 26392 of 2009 was also disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to bring her grievance, if any to the notice of the respondent Corporation. Now the petitioner again came up with the present Writ Petition for almost similar relief, which was sought for in the aforesaid Writ Petitions. Admittedly, this Court by recording the submission that the constructions made in contravention of the approved plan were demolished, disposed of the earlier Writ Petitions. It is also not in dispute that the 5th respondent has sought for regularization of illegal constructions made in the aforesaid premises, under Building Penalization Scheme. Even before the objections regarding the regularization of illegal constructions are considered, the petitioner cannot maintain this Writ Petition for the same relief. In that view of the matter, I do not find any merit in this Writ Petition and it is accordingly, dismissed. However, it is directed that if any constructions are made in contravention of the approved plan, the respondents are at liberty to take appropriate steps, in accordance with law. No costs. ---------------------------- (R. SUBHASH REDDY, J) 20th January 2010 ksld