Civil Revision No. 887of 2010 (O&M) 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 887of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.9.2010 Kirpal Singh Gill …Petitioner Versus Leela Jindal …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Gorakh Nath, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Diwan Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Civil Misc. No. 24121-CII of 2010 Civil Misc. Application is allowed. Reply to Civil Misc. No. 3353-CII of 2010 as well as to the grounds of revision are taken on record. Civil Misc. No. 3353-CII of 2010 & Civil Revision No. 887 of 2010 Grievance of the applicant/petitioner is that the Appellate Authority, Panchkula, has committed a grave error by describing the petitioner as an unauthorized licensee. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that in case finding of the Appellate Authority is affirmed to the extent that the petitioner is a licensee, the grievance can be set at rest. Civil Revision No. 887of 2010 (O&M) 2 In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent, finding of the Appellate Authority, Panchkula, that the petitioner is an unauthorized licensee, is modified to say that the petitioner is a licensee of the respondent. Civil Misc. Application and the instant revision petition are disposed of. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge September 21, 2010 “DK”