IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WPSS NO.955 OF 2008 Mohd. Usman Arif & Ors. …..Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ….. Respondents. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned counsel for the respondents. 25th September, 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Both the parties have agreed that the matter may be disposed of finally at the admission stage. 2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner have prayed for a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent no.1 to consider the case of the petitioners in parity with B.Ed through correspondence or distance education as has been taken on 12.12.2007 and permit the petitioners to undergo the training in Special BTC pursuant to advertisement dated 10‐7‐2006. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has confined his prayer for reconsideration of representation of the petitioners in the light of the recommendation of the Deputy Director, School Education, Uttarakhand, Dehradun contained in Annexure No.9 to the writ petition. 4. Prayer being innocuous, respondents are directed to reconsider the representation of the petitioners within a period of four weeks from the date of production of the certified copy of this order in the light of recommendation of the Deputy Director, School Education, Uttarakhand contained in Annexure No. 9 to the writ petition ignoring the earlier rejection order 5. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of finally. (P.C. Verma, J.) 25.9.2008 Rathour