((-1-)) MST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.834 OF 2007 Vasantrao Dadu Patil & others Petitioners versus Prashant Mallu @ Mallappa Miraje and others Respondents Ms.Namrata Waghole for petitioners. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 07th February 2007 PC : 1. Heard learned advocate for petitioners. The petitioners are the defendants in the suit filed by the first to fourth respondents. By the order impugned in this petition, the learned Trial Judge has permitted the original plaintiffs to carry out an amendment to the plaint. 2. Learned advocate for the petitioners submitted that the proposed amendment completely changes the nature of the suit, and, therefore, the same could not have been allowed. 3. I have considered the submissions. The suit ((-2-)) MST was filed on 9th January 2007 and an application was moved on 15th January 2007 for correcting certain typographical errors in the plaint. The said application has been allowed by the learned Trial Judge. A perusal of the proposed amendment shows that the same will not change the nature of the suit. Hence, the petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J.)