1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 456 of 2009 MD RAJ.STATE WAREHOUSING CORP. & ORS V/S VIJAY CHAND THANVI Mr. ANIL MEHTA, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. NM VYAS, for the respondent Date of Order : 8.7.2009 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI GOVIND MATHUR,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the appellant, and perused the impugned judgment. The learned Judge has rightly found that the writ petitioner is entitled to the seniority above the respondent no. 6, and rightly directed to place him above Rajendra Singh at S.No. 15, and obviously with consequential benefits like notional fixation of pay in the pay scale. The learned Judge has already directed that the petitioner will be entitled to actual monetary benefits w.e.f. 23.6.1990 only on which date he was discharging duties of post of junior assistant. Undisputed facts are that despite being senior, under the garb of reduction of work, the petitioner was 2 proposed to be terminated, and was absorbed on lower post, and shortly thereafter he was again promoted, but in that process the persons junior to him were neither proposed to be retrenched, nor were they sent on the lower post, and thus they were made to rank senior to the petitioner despite having been appointed after the petitioner on the above post. In these circumstances we do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /Sushil/