IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 17TH JULY 2007 / 26TH ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 21882 of 2007(E) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- P.P.KUNHIRAMAN, S/O.KANNAN, VEHICLE SUPERVISOR (RETD), KSRTC, KASARAGOD, PUTHIYAPURAYIL HOUSE, SANTHINAGAR, KUTTIKKOL P.O.,KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS SRI.P.P.SOMAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPOORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAING DIRECTOR,TRANSPORT BHAVAN,FORT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR AND CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER,KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN,FORT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT ACCOUNTS OFFICER (PENSION) KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN,FORT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KASARAGOD. BY ADV. SHRI JOHNSON P. JOHN, SC, KSRTC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.C. NO. 21882 OF 2007 E -------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th July, 2007 JUDGMENT Petitioner has retired from the service of the respondent KSRTC as Vehicle Supervisor on 31.5.2005. He has approached this Court for out of turn payment of DCRG and CVP due to the petitioner considering the Kidney Transplantation and further treatment of his son as evidenced by Exts.P2 and P3 Certificates. Heard the learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Corporation also. Petitioner has produced certain documents. But the learned counsel for the respondent Corporation points out that the petitioner has not produced any document to show that the petitioner's son had actually undergone surgery and also the amounts spent for the same. The Writ Petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for release of either DCRG or Commuted Value of Pension whichever is higher, to the petitioner on his producing WP(C) NO.21882/07 E 2 documents showing that his son had actually undergone surgery and also the amounts spent towards the same. If the petitioner produces such documents, the first respondent will effect payment of the amount due as DCRG or Commuted Value of Pension whichever is higher to the petitioner within a period of one month from the date the first respondent being satisfied on the basis of the documents produced before him that the petitioner's son had indeed undergone surgery and has incurred expenses towards the same. K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk.