IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 2156 of 2009 (M/S) Smt. Sunita Bhardwaj, W/o Kailash Bhardwaj, Resident of 353 (354A) Garhi Cant, District Dehradun ……Petitioner. Versus 1. Zarif Ahmed S/o Late Mushtaq Ahmed. 2. Anees Ahmed S/o Late Mushtaq Ahmed. Both residents of 351 and 352 Garhi Cantt District Dehradun. ………Respondents. Mr. Vinay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Date:- 21-12-2009 Hon’ble B.S. Verma J. Heard Mr. Vinay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ for expeditious disposal of the PA Case No. 43 of 2007, Smt. Sunita Bhardwaj VS. Zarif Ahmed and another pending in the court of Civil Judge (S.D.) Dehradun within the stipulated time. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the property No. 351 and 352, Garhi Cantt, Dehreadun. Initially the said property was belongs to one Sri Pushkar Singh Khatri, who rented the same to Mushtaq Ahmed. After the death of Mustaq Ahmed, his sons namely Zarif Ahmed and Anees Ahmed came into the possession of the said property and became a tenant of Sri Pushkar Singh. On 29-10-2005, Sri Pushkar Singh Khatri was died issueless. Smt. Sunita Bhardwaj present petitioner 2 was the adopted child of deceased Sri Pushkar Singh came into possession over the property in question by way of registered will dated 5-10-2004, which was executed by the deceased Sri Pushkar Singh Khatri. Thereafter, Sri Mushtaq Ahmed was expired and after his demise his sons namely Zarif Ahmed and Anees Ahmed came into possession of the rented property and they are trying to alter the structure of the rented property. Then the petitioner has filed PA Case No. 43 of 2007, Sunita Bhardwaj Vs. Zarid Ahmed and another in the Court of Civil Judge (S.D) Dehradun under Section 21 (1) (a) of the U.P. Rent Control and Eviction Act, 1972. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the PA case is pending since 2007 and due to dilatory tactics adopted by the respondents, the PA case is pending for a long time. I have perused the material available on record. The prayer made by the petitioner is innocuous and deserves to be accepted. The learned Civil Judge (S.D.), Dehradun is directed to decide the PA Case No. 43 of 2007, Sunita Bhardwaj Vs. Zarid Ahmed and another under Section 21 (1) (a) of the U.P. Rent Control and Eviction Act, 1972, expeditiously preferably as far as possible within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S. Verma, J.) 21-12-2009 MK