hvn/.. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.530 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 482 OF 2002 M/s. Anurag Sites & Anr. ... Petitioners Versus The Mun. Corpn of Gr. Bombay and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Kiran Jain with Ms. Nitya Solanki for Petitioner. Mr. C.U. Singh, Sr. Counsel with Mrs. P.A. Purandhare for R. No. 1. Mrs. S.M. Dandekar, A.G.P. for R.No. 2. Mr. S.C. Naidu with Mr. R.A. Rodrigues and J. Saluja i/by Vinay K. Tiwari for R. No. 3. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED: DECEMBER 05, 2006 DATED: DECEMBER 05, 2006 DATED: DECEMBER 05, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Considering the letter dated 12.10.2006 of the Municipal Corporation, it is clarified that the hoardings Nos. 191 and 192 have not been allotted to Mittal Advertisement but to TTK Associates. That only hoarding No. 193 is allotted to Mittal Associates. We find no case for interference. In the light of that Motion rejected. . On behalf of the Petitioners, their learned counsel files affidavit disputing correctness of the letter If that be so, the petition raises disputed question of law. At any rate no case made out for recalling the order. Motion stands disposed of. 2 (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)