HIGH COURT OF CHHA’I‘TISGARH : BILASPUR Writ PCtition (Cn‘) No. 5030 of 2008 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihoiri J.) Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M. P. S. Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondents No. 1 to 3/ State. Shri Manoj Paxanjpe, Advocate for the respondent No.4. 0 R D E R (Passed on this 28th day of April, 2009) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petih‘oner submits that the respondents No. 1 to 3/State in the additional reply dated i 12.2.2009 has stated that the investigation in Crime No. 351/2008, Police Station — Ambikapur has been completed and no oEence has been found to have been committed by the accused. The Khatma report dated 9.2.2009 (Annexure R/ 4) is to be med in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate. He further ‘is :;i Petitioner Atul Dubey, son of Shri V. N. Dubey, aged about 41 years, Occupation — Director, Rekhankan Builders Pvt. Limited, resident of Shivayan Villa, Pratappur Nagar, Ambikapur (CG) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhatu‘sgarh, through the Secretaly, Department of Home, D.‘K.S. Bhawan, Mandalaya, Raipur. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Surguja, ‘ Ambikapur. 3. The Police Station, Ambikapur, District Sarguja. 4. Shri K. N. Singh, son of Shri R. B. Singh, Occupation — Not known to the petitioner, aged about 37 years, resident of Kedarpur, Ambikapur. W .— l’ submits that in View of the Khatma report (Annaxum R/4), this peu‘tion has become infructuous. Laarned counsel appearing for thé mspbndents/ Stats does not contmvert the above submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Accordingly, ‘this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. The interim order stands vacated. However, it is made clear that the order passed hereinabove will not ah‘ect the pendency of any other case against the peu'tioner. ff Sdl- i I Satish K. Agmho‘m Jildge