IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2011 / 2ND ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 16924 of 2011(M) -------------------------- PETITIONERS --------------- 1. K.G.RAJAGOPALAKRISHNAN, MELEPPURA HOUSE, ANAPAARA, KOTTEKAD, PALAKKAD. 2. SOUDAMINI, 9/149, CHATHAMKULAM HOUSE, KONGAD P.O., PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN SMT.P.G.BABITHA RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, OFFICE OF THE LAND TRIBUNAL, PALAKKAD-678001. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, MALAMPUZHA II VILLAGE, PALAKKAD-678001. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. SMT. RAJASREE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 16924 of 2011(M) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE POSSOESSION CE RTIFICTE IN RESPECT OF THE ENTIRE PROPERTY. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY O THE LAND TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT FORWARDED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT. EXT. P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE FIRST PETITIONER. EXT.P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE NO OBJECTION SUBMITTED BY THE JENMI. EXT.P6: : TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION PREFERRED BY THE SECOND PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 16924 OF 2011 ......................................................................... Dated this the 23rd June, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioners have approached this Court with the following prayers: “A. Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writs, orders or directions commanding the first respondent to allow Exhibit P6 application for impleadment preferred by the second petitioner. B. Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writs, orders or directions commanding the first respondent to conclude the proceedings in SM. 708/2010 as expeditiously as possible and to issue 'Pattayam' at any rate within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. C. Render such other orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. ” 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. W.P.(C) No. 16924 OF 2011 2 3. In view of the limited nature of the relief now pressed before this Court, it is not necessary to refer to the facts and figures as narrated in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider Ext. P6 application preferred by the second petitioner seeking for impleadment in the pending proceedings in S.M. 708 of 2010 before the first respondent and pass appropriate orders, finalising the pending proceedings, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 'three months' from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for taking further steps. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk