FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4039 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4038 OF 2009 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Heard Mr. Godbharle, learned A.P.P. for the applicant-State and counsel Mr. Raje, h/f Mr. C.R. Deshpande, learned counsel for the respondents. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. The applicant-State, by this application seeks condonation of delay of 108 days occurred in filing appeal against acquittal. The applicant-State has offered the explanation for delay in para 2 of the application. On behalf of the respondents, reply affidavit is filed opposing the averments made on behalf of the State. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, we are inclined to allow this application. Criminal application accordingly is allowed in terms of prayer clause “A” and “B” and disposed of. Rule made absolute in the above terms. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) (S.B. DESHMUKH, J.) Date:23.04.2010. rlj/ FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4038 OF 2009 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Heard Mr. Godbharle, learned A.P.P. for the applicant-State. Call for record and proceeding of the case. S.O. after summer vacation of 2010. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) (S.B. DESHMUKH, J.) Date:23.04.2010. rlj/