1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2239 OF 2009 Parasmal Chimanlal Kothari .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents Shri A.R. Pande for the Petitioners. Shri K.V. Saste, APP, for the State. Shri Sandeep Patil for Respondent No.2. CORAM: BILAL NAZKI & A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED: AUGUST 31, 2009 P.C: The grievance of the petitioner is that his vehicle has been seized as his driver failed to pay the duty. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-corporation submits that they have no objection to release the vehicle provided the requisite demands are fulfilled and the amounts deposited. In view of this submission, the petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to release the vehicle on satisfying itself about 2 the genuineness of the claim of the petitioner and also on payment of the requisite duty. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J.