^^' ' ^^ 1 SSNfi5_E BENI ^^'^'i,s^,~u IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATLBILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N(^^ OF 2006 1. •y PETITIONER: ' Roshan Lal, S/o Shri Nathan D. Lal, Aged about 57 years, Presently ^b..--^ posted and working as Ranger, ^\^- ..•• Dhamtari Porest Division, District ..^y^— .^••'"^'^ versus }.v' ^-' \--" ^•"^ f.®-' RE§EO^'i)ENTS: ^^ ^'^ ^ ev^ ^- ^^ 'ii:0-' y ^- •KTP. &, 1. State ofChhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, CUhattisgarh. 2. Under Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Divisional Forest Officer Department of Forest, Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. WMT PETITIONJJNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .__ •y.f«9srefeF^'s!h y •sS-"^^'fe' '"l ^" XI-HC-22 an^rw R-li*3fT^T shiro uRo '•><. >s 6dWL f 3^'<II^IC1<I, ®Tfl'H'l6,Rdl'Hy ^'M-ff!:..3W.^. *<IIPII fhw*> """""'""" ""IW^ 200 ao^l^WlWHftff IAZ^S^ Heard Shri V.R. Tiwari, oouhsel Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy advancecopy. By the instant petition, th^ dated 7fh July 2006 (Anneuxre-P/1] The main ground of challefige more than 10% employees are to| this guideline has been w'olated. The seoond ground is that | Teacher at Dhamtari, therefore, ought not to have been transferre|di completed only 22 months at the p( Learned counsel for the already made a representation to to decide representation to whicjh objection. Having heard learned couitsel and oircumstances ofthe oase andl of the case, the prayer made by le^rned reasonable, therefore, respondent) made by the petittoner, within a p^r all the points raised by the petition^r, With the direction aforesaicl Consequently, M.(W.)P.Nc( djsposed Of. Parties are entitledfor certif <»)i<<In41-<tiiMrtT¥fel<fl<RfWI< ^srf^rsn^r for thepetitioner. povt. Advocate fbr the State/ respondents, on petiticner has questloned his tnansfer order is that as per the Govemment Poticy not [be transferred whereas, in the present case, the wife of the petitioner is working as Senior ^s per the Govemment Policy the petitioner ), particularly, when the petitioner has so far (•esent place of posting. Ipetitioner submitted that the petitioner has respondent No.1, therefore, he be directed learned ccunsel for respondents has no Ihe for the parties, having regard to the facts without expressing any opinion on the merits counsel for the petitjoner is just, fair and N6.1 is directed to decide the representation 'riod of 30 days from today, after considering in accordance with law. the petition stands disposed of. 2661/2006 and I.A.No.6777/2006 also stand edoopyofthfeorder. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge