2906sa293.99.odt 1/1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. SECOND APPEAL NO. 293 OF 1999 Kamrunnjsa Begum & others vs. Qazi Faziloddin & others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Anil Mardikar, Adv. for the appellants. CORAM : A. B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATE : 29th June, 2009. The appeal against respondents No. 1 and 3 has already been dismissed by the order of Registrar of this Court for non prosecution. Respondent No. 2 alone remains on the record. The appellate Court has set aside the judgment and decree regarding injunction in relation to the lane between two houses by recording finding of fact. I have gone through the judgment of the appellate Court as well as trial Court and after hearing learned Counsel for the appellant, I find that mere questions of factS are involved. No substantial question of law is at all involved. The appellate Court found that plaintiff/appellant had failed to specify the details of the suit property. In the result, I find no substance in the present second appeal and the same is dismissed with no costs. JUDGE wwl