dz ’ ( m //“ 2 Before Hon'ble Hi_qh Court of Chhattisgarh At Bilaspur w. P43). No. [Q ”$3 /, Singia Bim'ichs Smt. Purnima Shukla Age about 37 year, U. D. T.. W/o Shri Shailendra Kumar Shukla Govt. Middle School Chikhali Distt.— Rajnandgaon (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS ResPONDENTs 1:/’/State Govt. of Chhattisarh Through : The Secretary Education Depanment D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) /’ 2: The Director Public Instruction Raipur . istt. Raipur (C.G.) 3: The Distt. Education Officer Rajnandgaon Distt- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA @ g @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATI‘ISGARH AT BILASP‘UR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 122 of2009 PETITIONER : Smt. Pumima Shukla. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State Govt. ofChhattisgarh & Others. ‘ WRIT PB llHON UNDER ARTICLE 226 ()F THE CONSTITUIION OF INDIA bB Hon’ble Shrl Saush K. Agmhotn, J Present: Shri Ajay Sbn'vastava, Advocate for the petitioner. 1 .. Shri AV.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the Statefrespon&ems. “ ORDER ORAL . (Passed on 05 day of January, 201 1) 1. Leamed counsel appean'ng for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks pennission of this Court to withdraw this petition on the ground - that the prayer sought for in this petition has already been r a considered in the earlier writ petitionbeing ’W.P.(S) No. 6238/2006 which was disposed of by this Court on 16.11.2006, reserving r ‘ liberty to the petitioner to file a representation for considering his t case by the respondent authorities within a period of one month in the light of the order dated 3101.2000 passed in O.A. No. 1452/1998. Learned counsel further seeks permission to raise the issue, if subsequent cause of action arises. Learned coun/se‘l apgeaiipg for the other side has no objection. It is not necessary to gant any liberty or permission, to challenge the subsequent cause of action, if any. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ‘1 Sdl- i Satish K. Agnihptri i 11 Judge r r i 77 i » 7