THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.764 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner submitted an application to the 1st respondent on 11.07.2009, with a request to permit him to maintain the traffic islands and gardens within the limits of Karimnagar Municipal Corporation, provided he be allowed to display his commercial advertisements. He also expressed his willingness to pay the taxes, etc. The grievance of the petitioner is that, even while his application was pending, the 1st respondent has accorded permission to the 2nd respondent to undertake such activity. Further, a declaration is sought to the effect that the action of the 1st respondent in not considering the representation, dated 11.07.2009, is illegal and arbitrary. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner has not challenged any specific order. An allegation is made to the effect that the permission was accorded to the 2nd respondent for undertaking the activities, referred to above. Learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent submits that no such request has been received. Be that as it may, the present writ petition cannot be maintained, since it is not directed against any specific proceedings. The petitioner can procure a copy of the proceedings, dated 07.06.2010 and file the writ petition, or initiate such proceedings as are open to him in law. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to obtain a copy of the proceedings, dated 07.06.2010, issued in favour of the 2nd respondent, by the 1st respondent. The same shall be furnished by the 1st respondent on submission of an application and payment of requisite fee, if any. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.24.01.2011. GJ