THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY CC NO.1546 OF 2008 Dated: 25.6.2010 Between: P. Kata Rao ..Petitioner And Ms. Renu Challu .. Respondent. This Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY CC NO.1546 OF 2008 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Smt Justice T. Meena Kumari) The Contempt Case has been filed complaining willful disobedience of judgment, dated 4.6.2007 in WA Nos.627 and 628 of 2005. The above writ appeals had been filed by the State Bank authorities aggrieved by the order dated 7.2.2005 passed by the learned single Judge in WP Nos.476 of 2001 and 25095 of 1999, wherein the appellants-authorities are directed to pay subsistence allowance and all such other allowances to which the petitioner is entitled during the period of his suspension from 1.8.1994 to 2.7.1999. The Division Bench considered the matter on merits and while disposing of the writ appeal, observed that once the order imposing penalty on the respondent as confirmed by the appellate authority, was set aside, Regulation 69 (4) and (7) got attracted and the respondent acquired the status of a suspended officer for the purpose of grant of subsistence allowance. In this regard, the respondents-authorities herein also filed a counter-affidavit contending that as the amount of subsistence allowance from 1.8.1994 to 2.7.1999 was paid pursuant to the orders of the Court in W.P.No:25095 of 1999 way back in May, 2008, the contempt case alleging violation of the orders of this Court, does not survive for adjudication. The main grievance of the petitioner in the present contempt case is that he is entitled to subsistence and other allowances from 2.7.1999 till 31.7.2004. But there is no material before this Court to conclude that he is entitled to receive the allowance as claimed by him. In the absence of any such material, we are not inclined to entertain this contempt case. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to agitate his rights before the appropriate authority, if he so desires. __________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari __________________________ Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Date: 25.6.2010 NN THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY CC NO.1546 OF 2008 (Order delivered by Hon’ble Smt Justice T. Meena Kumari) 25.06.2010