IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 1330 of 2011 Date of decision: 11.08.2011 Kesar Singh …. Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ... Respondent Coram : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Mr. K.C. Sankhyan, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. V.K. Ahuja, J. (Oral): The petitioner, who is posted as Principal, School Cadre, was posted in Govt. Sr. Secondary School Sharti, District Mandi, and has been transferred vide impugned transfer order, Annexure P-1 dated 30.6.2010, to Halau (Shimla) against vacancy. The petitioner challenged his transfer order and he made a representation and requested for his adjustment in the schools mentioned in the representation. The said representation was decided by the Principal, Secretary vide his order dated 23.7.2011 and he passed orders for adjustment of the petitioner at Dadahu, District Sirmour, H.P., keeping in view his health problem. However, the petitioner was aggrieved by this order and now as the things stand, it has been informed to the Principal Secretary (Education), to the government of Himachal Pradesh, that a post of Principal is lying vacant in Govt. Sr. Secondary School 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 Tatapani and the petitioner has given his willingness, as submitted by him in Court. The petitioner also submits that he is ready, if he is posted at Tatapani. The Principal Secretary (Education) shall consider the request of the petitioner and consider the case of the petitioner, if he can be adjusted at Tatapani. The petitioner who is present in Court, submits that he has already made representation to the Principal Secretary (Education) and his willingness to be posted at Tatapani and the Principal Secretary (Education) shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders within two weeks after the copy of the order of the Court is submitted by the petitioner before the concerned Secretary. Till the representation is decided, the petitioner shall avail leave of the kind due to him. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s) if any. Copy of the order be given Dasti to both the parties. ( V.K. Ahuja ), August 11, 2011 Judge (BSS) 3