y(li ^ IN THE mCH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) CONTEMPTCASENO.OSr /2007 ( Arising out oforderdate 10.10.06 passedbyHon'ble JusticeShri S.K. Agmhotri in W.P. (S) No. 5$T2/200 ABPLICANT ~7 ~ CONTEMPTNOR X>NAPPLICANT '!"-'., :^Budhawara Bai W/o Shri Kheduram R/o Chhoti Koni, Bilaspur; Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. /" 2. J.S. Dixit Secretary, i Department of Publie Works, D.K.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) S.B. Solairid Engineer-in-^hief, Department ofPublic Works, Raipur (C.G.) D.K. Jain Superintending Engiaeer, Department ofPublic Works, Bilaspur Division, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. P.M. Kashyap Executive Engmeer, -S^- Department pfPublic Woiks,. Division No.l Bilaspur Distt;Bilaspur(C.G.) 3. APPUCATION UNDERSECTION215 OF THE CONSTlTCnON OFINDIA K HI6H COURT OF CMHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR Contennpt Petition No. OS of 2007 Single BenchiHon'bteShri Satish K. Agnihbtri, J. Applicant BudhawaraBtn Versus Respondents J.S. Dixit ond others •^' Ppesent: Mr. S.P. Kate,counselfor the applicant. Mr. V.V.S. Moorthy, Senior counsel with Mrs. Aryu Ahuja, counset for the respondents. ORbER ;th (Passed on 6T" bay of Ftebruary, 2(K)7) Tliis Court, vide order dated 10.10.2006, passed 'm WP. (s) No. 5812 of 2006 (Budhawaro Bai Vs. State of Chhattisgarh ond others). direct'ed the concerned authority to decide the representotion within one month from the dtrt-e of receipt of the representtrtion. It oppears thct the representation could not be decided u(ithin the prescribed time. The petitioner has filed this contempt petition on 28.12.2006, statirg non-compliance of the opder of this Court by theconcerned authority. - -y- * 2. . Mr. V.V.S. Moorthy, leorned counsel appearjng for the re.spondents/contemnors submits that in comptiance with the order of •Kiis Court dated 10.10.2006, passed in W. P. (s) 5512 of 2006, Public Works Department, Sovemment of Chhatti^arh, Raipur (C.6.) hos issued an order dated 16.1.2007. LetB'nedcounsel appearlrg for the reqaondents/contefflnors TRS' place a copy (yf tlTe sotd order dated 16.1.2007 befoTe this Gourt'. 'n'ie docunent is taken on record. 3. In vlew of the compliance of the order of this Court by the respondents/contemnors, nothing survives in thls matter. However, in the facts and GircumstOnces of the case,the authorities ore wtB'ned not to recur this conduct in future. If the time is prescribed for compliance of anyorder of this Court,the order must be complied with wtthin the prescribed tinie, otherwise !t amounts to contempt of Court. 4. In view of •the foregoing, the contempt petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subh&sh 1