IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 5TH JULY 2011 / 14TH ASHADHA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 5183 of 2011() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.368/2011 OF BEKAL POLICE STATION, KASARAGODE PETITIONERS : ACCUSED -------------------------------------- 1. ANAS T.M,AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.MAJEED, THOTTY HOUSE, THOTTY, P.O.PALLIKKERE PIN-671316 2. ILYAS.C.,AGED 24 YEARS,S/O.LATE C.ABDULLA HAJI, THOTTY HOUSE, THOTTY, P.O.PALLIKKERE,PIN-671316 3. HASANUL ULAIB A.K,AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.ABDULLA, A.K.HOUSE, THOTTY, P.O.PALLIKKERE,PIN-671316 4. SUHAIB P,AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.ABDULLA,KALLEL MANZIL, THAYAL THOTTY, P.O.PALLIKKERE, PIN-671316 5. MASHOOD T,AGED 22YEARS,S/O.HAMSA, MASHOOD MANZIL, THAYAL THOTTY, P.O.PALLIKKERE, PIN-671316 6. SAHEER. AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.KUNHAMED, THOTTIYIL HOUSE, THAYAL THOTTY, P.O.PALLIKKERE, PIN-671316 BY ADV. SMT.P.K.PRIYA SRI.K.V.SREE VINAYAKAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM,REPRESENTING BEKAL POLICE STATION. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.TEKCHAND THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. --------------------------- B.A.No.5183 of 2011 --------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of July, 2011 O R D E R This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.368 of 2011 of Bekal Police Station. 2. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 143, 147, 148, 324 and 308 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The prosecution case is that on 14.6.2011, at 9 P.M., the de facto complainant was attacked by the accused with iron rods and caused injuries. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor in detail. 5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of BA No.5183/2011 2 the case, the nature of the offence and the injury sustained by the de facto complainant, I do not think that this is a fit case where anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners. The Bail Application is accordingly dismissed. K.T.SANKARAN JUDGE csl