IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3507 of 2010 Date of decision: 7.7.2010 Nirmala Panwar, ….. Petitioner. Vs. State of H.P. and others …. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Y.W Chauhan, vice Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure P-3, order of his transfer. The petitioner has submitted that he may be permitted to represent before second respondent pointing out the vacancy arising at Nahan in which case the second respondent would be in a position to pass an appropriate order. 2. The writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in case the writ petitioner makes a representation to second respondent within one month from today, the said respondent shall consider the 2 representation of the petitioner in light of the rules and pass orders within another one month. Copy dasti ( Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice ( Kuldip Singh) Judge July 7, 2010 (sks/grs)