CW 3343/08 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3343/08 Sohan Lal Dhanka Versus State & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 26/08/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Dr. Saugath Roy, for petitioner Mr. Sanjay Srivastava, Dy. Govt. Counsel, for State Mr. T.P. Sharma, for respondent *** Instant petition has been basically filed by petitioner assailing order by which his order of deputation was cancelled and was repatriated back to his parent department vide order Ann.6 dt.18th March, 2008. However, when the matter came up before this court on 19th August, 2008, it was submitted by counsel for petitioner that after being relieved he joined in parent department on 16th July, 2008 and is no more concerned to assail the validity of order Ann.6. However, he submitted that after passing of order Ann.6 dt.18th March, 2008 and till he relieved the salary has not been paid by respondent No.2. Misc. application was filed by petitioner for the purpose of release of salary for the intervening period. This fact has also come on record that after passing of order Ann.6 dt.18th March, 2008 CW 3343/08 [2] Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Dausa wrote a letter not to relieve the petitioner and infact he was allowed to continue in the office of Rajasthan SC, ST Financial & Development Co- operative Nigam Ltd., Nehru Sahakar Bhawan, Jaipur and was relieved on 14th July, 2008 and he joined in his parent department on 16th July, 2008. Once the petitioner had worked in the office of respondent No.2 and relieved on 14th July, 2008, certainly he is entitled for salary of the intervening period. Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 to release salary of the petitioner upto 14th July, 2008 the day he was relieved from their office. The same be paid to him after its due computation within two months. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA3343CW2008 26-8.doc