IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28655 of 2008 MD.MURTUZA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 29/9/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is the father-in-law apprehending arrest in a police case under Sections- 323, 354 and 498A of I.P.C. and ¾ of D.P. Act. For reasons discussed in paragraph-4 of the impugned order of rejection, when there is no further discussion in the order why the petitioner being similarly situated was not entitled to grant of anticipatory bail like others granted anticipatory bail, the court below has refused to exercise its discretion, in accordance with law. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case let the petitioner above named surrender before the court below within six weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Barauni P.S. Case No.48/08, subject to the conditions laid down under Section- 438(2) of Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )