IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3172 of 1994 1.M/S Chitralaya Satellite, through its proprietor Amaresh Ranjan, son of Mr.J.N.Prasad, resident of New Area, Kadamkuan, P.S. Kadamkuan, District- Patna 2.M/s Global Vision, through its Proprietor Shri H.B.Singh, son of Sri Sada Shiva Prasad Singh, resident of M2/5, Srikrishnapuri, P.S. Shrikrishnapuri, District- Patna 3.M/s Star Satellite Vision, through its proprietor Sri Lalan Singh, son of Sri Ram Lakhan Singh, resident of 1B/15, Road No.13, New Patliputra Colony, P.S. Patliputra Colony, District- Patna 4.M/s Ma Laxmi Satellite, through its proprietor Sri Muno Kumar, son of Sri Rameshwar Prasad Singh, resident of Sarda Sadan, opposite to Tapasaya Complex, Boring Road, P.S. Srikrishnapuri, District- Patna 5.M/s Vision of Satellite Collection, through its proprietor Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, son of Sri Brijnandan Singh, resident of Industrial Estate Area, Patna 6.M/s Cable Vision Network, through its proprietor Sri Rameshwar Prasad, son of Late Sri Janki Shah, resident of M3/18, Road No.11, Rajendra Nagar, Patna, District- Patna 7.M/s Super Natural Satellite Network, through its proprietor 8.M/s Prince Vision Media, through its proprietor Jai Hind Prasad, son of Sri Sita Ram Singh, resident of Karan Sarai, Gokul Dham, Sasaram, Rohtas 9.Satya Ranjan, son of Mr.Laxmi Narain Singh, resident of Zakki Bigha, Dalmia Nagar, District- Rohtas ………. Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Bihar through Secretary (Finance) Government of Bihar, Patna 2.Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bihar, Patna 3.Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Patliputra Circle, Patna 4.Commercial Taxes Officer, Patna 5.Commercial Taxes Officer, Patna South Circle, Patna 6.Commercial Taxes Officer, Patliputra Circle, Patna 7.Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Rohtas, Sasaram ………… Respondents ----------- 5. 13/08/2010 None appears for the petitioner. - 2 - Pradeep/ Heard Mr.Anil Kumar Verma, learned A.C. to Standing Counsel No.3 for the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the present case is covered by the Division Bench judgment dated 22.3.1994 passed in C.W.J.C.No.1669 of 1993(R) (Sky Vision T.V. Vs. State of BNihar & Ors.). In view of non-appearance of learned counsel for the petitioner, it appears that they are not interested in pursuing the writ petition any further. It is accordingly dismissed for non- prosecution. (S.K.Katriar,J.) (J. N. Singh,J.)