IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8392 of 2009 CHATURGUN PRASAD, son of late Banke Lal, resident of Mohalla-Solra, P.O. Solra, P.S. Paraiya, Distt. Gaya, dismissed and retired from the post of Revenue Karamchari, Belaganj Anchal, District Gaya. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through Chief Secretary of Bihar. 2. The Secretary of Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya. 4. The District Magistrate Cum Collector, Gaya. 5. The Sub Divisional Officer, Gaya. 6. Circle Officer, Belaganj Anchal, Gaya. 7. Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna. 8. District Provident Fund Officer, Gaya. ---Respondents ----------- 7. 10.2.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as well as the learned counsel appearing for the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his termination from the service, he has not been paid his admissible dues on account of leave encashment, part of G.P.F. and gratuity. It is further submitted that pension of the petitioner has not been fixed as yet. Learned counsel for the State submits that since the petitioner was dismissed on account of serious lapses, he is not entitled to the pension and leave salary as has been stated in the counter affidavit. However, no separate order has been passed in this regard. Learned counsel for the State further submits that the admissible G.P.F. and group insurance has been paid. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even on 2 termination of the services of the petitioner, he is entitled to receive the same. However, for expeditious disposal of the aforesaid claims, the petitioner proposes to file a detailed representation stating distinctly all the claims as raised in this writ application before the District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Gaya (respondent no.4), with a copy to the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna (respondent no.7). In case such a representation is filed enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, respondent no.4 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner raised in his representation could be redressed without further delay. In case the representation of the petitioner is accepted, the admissible dues shall be paid with statutory interest. However, if any of the claims or part of the claim is found not acceptable, the petitioner shall be informed of the same with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)