THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 15329 of 2005 Dated: 24.08.2005 Between: Indira Seva Sadan Trust, H.No. HIG-B6-F1, Baghlingampally, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Managing Trustree, Sri S. Viswanatham. ..... PETITIONER AND The Regional Joint Commissioner of Endowments, MZ-III, Hyderabad and others. …. RESPONDENTS ORDER: This writ petition has been filed by Indira Seva Sadan Trust, represented by its Managing Trustee Sri.S.Viswanatham, with a prayer to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order passed by the regional Joint commissioner of Endowments, Multi zone-III, Hyderabad in R.P.No. 1055 of 2004 dated 25.05.2005 and quash the same. The writ petitioner is one of the respondents and the third respondent herein is the applicant in O.A.No. 94 of 2002. The fourth respondent herein is also one of the respondents in the said O.A. She (Smt.b.Radhika) filed I.A.No.3 of 2004 for an interim order restraining the Indira Seva Sadan trust from closing down the Indira Seva Sadan Hostel-orphanage. An ad-interim order came to be passed in the said application by the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments Department, Warangal Zone, Warangal dated 01.09.2004. The relevant portion of the said order reads as follows: “In view of the above findings and in exercise of the powers conferred upon me under Sub-Section 2 of Section 87 of APC HRU & Endowments Act 30/1987, I restrain the respondent No.1 herein and his agents, administrators and the nominees etc., from closing down the Indira Seva Sadan Hostel/Orphanage for women. It is also ordered to start the new admissions into the hostel and to restore the old orphanage students back into the hostel pending disposal of the above enquiry. Enquiry into the I.A., stands posted to 25.09.2004 at 2.30 P.M., for filing counter by the respondent.” Assailing the said order, the first respondent (writ petitioners) in I.A.No. 3 of 2004 carried the matter in revision before the Regional Joint Commissioner, Endowments Department, Multi Zone-III, Hyderabad. The revisional authority, by an order dated 25.05.2005 dismissed the revision. Hence, this writ petition. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the original authority- Deputy Commissioner, passed the order without proper appreciation of the material brought on record and therefore, the orders passed by the original authority as well as the revisional authority are liable to be quashed. Learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent submits that the writ petitioner has not chosen to file counter in the I.A., despite granting number of adjournments and therefore, the original authority is justified in passing the order dated 01.09.2004. Various other contentions have been raised by both the counsel, which are not required to be elaborated in view of the order proposed to be passed. It is explicit from the order passed by the original authority i.e., Deputy Commissioner of Endowments that time has been given to the writ petitioner for filing counter and pending enquiry into the application filed by the fourth respondent herein, an ad-interim order came to be passed. It is now brought to my notice that the writ petitioner has filed counter-affidavit in I.A.No.3 of 2004. Such is the situation, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments to dispose of I.A.No. 3 of 2004 in O.A.No. 94 of 2002 on merits within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________ 24.08.2005 sh