\L? HIGH COURT OF CHHATTHSGARH A? B§LASPUR Division Bench Coram : Hon’bie Shri Jagdish Bhaiia, Acting C.J. & Hon’ble Shri Diiip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Writ Petition No.2983 of 2004 Ramesh Kumar Chandra, $lo Shri Durba! Prasad Chandra, Aged about 46 years, R/o Viilage Jhairounda, Tehsii: Jaijaipur, District Janjgir (CG) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Buiiding, Raipur (CG) 2. State of Madhya Pradesh Through: The Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Vaiiabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MR) 3. Unioh of India, Through: The Secretary, Ministry of Rurai Deveiopment, Government of India, New Delhi. 4. The New India Assurance Co.Ltd. Through: its Branch Manager, Biiaspur (CG) 5. The Coliector, Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa (CG) Writ Petition under Articie 226i22? of the Constitution of indie. ' Petitioner Respondents Present : Shri HS. Patei, counseiforthe petitioner. Shri U.N.S. Deo, Govt. Advocate for Stateireepondents No.1 and 5. Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, counsel for the respondent .Ne.2. Shri S.K. Beriwai, counsei for the respondent No.3/Union oflndia. Shri Ali Asgar, counsei for the respondent No.4/New lndia Assurance. the A ORAL oRoER /. (Passed on 11‘“ or September, 2697) The following oral order of the Court was passed by Hon’ble Shri Jagdish Bhalla, Acting Chief Justice : \wz Heard. Response fned by learned Government Advocate on behah‘ of Stateirespondents No.1 & 5 indicates ihat 3 families of the deceased namely Rooplal, Ramvilas and Bhururam are not there in the list of persons living below the poverty line, therefore, they are not entitled for getting ex-gratia payment. ln view of the fact that rest of the money relates to ex—gratia payment are distributed amongst all the aggrieved parties, the writ A“: petition has become infructuous. Accordingly. the writ petition is dismissed as having become , Sd/- § Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge infructuous. . sci/- Actingbhier Justice Tumane