IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4599 of 2010 KAMESHWAR PRASAD SON OF LATE NARAYAN YADAV R/O- ALAKAPURI COLONY, P.S. GARDANIBAGH, DISTRICT – PATNA Versus 1. COMMISSIONER CUM C.E.O.,PMC BUDH MARG PATNA. 2. EXECUTIVE OFFICER NUTUN RAJDHANI ANCHAL, 10 HARDING ROAD PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PATNA ----------- 02. 17.03.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State as also the respondent – Corporation. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31ST of JuLY 2009 from the post of Tax Collector from New Capital Circle of the respondent – Corporation, entire retiral dues of the petitioner have not been paid till date despite representation. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent – Corporation submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 2. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the 2 relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with statutory interest. However, if any of the claims are found not admissible, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)