: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.3332 of 1992 SUIT NO.3332 of 1992 SUIT NO.3332 of 1992 M/s.Parle Products Ltd. & Anr. .. Plaintiffs. Versus M/s.Shree Durga Roadlines .. Defendants. None for parties. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATE : 29th September, 2008. DATE : 29th September, 2008. DATE : 29th September, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. None for the plaintiffs. None for the defendants. Today also, nobody is present on behalf of the plaintiffs. It seems that the plaintiffs are not interested in prosecuting the suit. Hence, the suit is required to be dismissed. 2. Suit is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. : 2 : (R.Y. GANOO,J.) (R.Y. GANOO,J.) (R.Y. GANOO,J.)