•^s-'^^ wwxs c- rF^0 IN THE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 5^>-< /2006 .^/// y// ryy / / ~r/ / / ^ ^ B.J. Rao, S/o- Late Shri B.A. Rao, Aged about 62 years, R/o- House No. 1/2, Rajeev Nagar, P.0. Shankar Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ^ / GO' y^. ^^"^ ^•' / y <^ VERSUS Food Coiporation oflndia, Through- Managing Director, Head Quarter - New Delhi, 16-20 Barakhamba Lane, NEWDELffl. PETITIONER / 2. The Executive Director, Food Corporarion oflndia, Dhiraj Arma Building, Near Anant Kanekar Police Station, Bandra (East) MUMBAI-400051. ; 3. The General Manager, Food Corporation oflndia, Ring Road Chouraha, Telibandha, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ..<^s::;:s5s%:!sss,, ' 4- ^%1!NS%> ff •ia ";.'<:. The Area Manager, Food Corporation oflndia, Madeena Building, Jail Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5. The Employees Provident Fimd Qrganization, Through- Commissioner, Regional Office, 8 & 9 Floor. Mayur Bhawan, Coanaught Circus, NewDellu-1. RESPONDENTS zr7:: - ^ - —^.^ ^I] :;J om ^) w m 1>•o -0 70 70 m 76 lm g yom o T1 o a o 70 00 u> c? (fl |0 Im 10 m 70 I"*1 m o 0m ?0 lip 1-1 |0 |r- |m KO N0 N N "n m \ XI-HC-22 W^T^iT fewgn^T sn*< gfer .-7-2006: '.*<. 5oma ^ ^ -^ *<1*ICTI ShHIW S^anq^pT, ^Tflyiid, f^Tray W^l MS<ch ^ 200^-^ sn^TS^nwgfer *i«^in^Ki4cfi'iffe'<ii <|S|^K ^'3T)^lT3n^T Heard Shri Pankoj Shrivc^tava, counsel for the petitioner". The case of the petition^r is that respfcndent No.l is not forwarding necessory particulars to respor^dent No.5 regarding deductions made from the salary of the petitioner ii|i order to enable respondent No.5 to fix pension. Prom perusa! of the p^tition, it appears that before filing this petition, tha petitioner' has not ^eiivered any notiee for demand ofjustice to respondent No.l. Learned counset for tl^e petitioner submitted that according to Clause 17 of the Empioyees' P^nsion Scheme respondents are bound to fix the pension within a period of 3 months ft'om the date of retirement and the petitioner had retired in the m^nth of June, 2004. Even after the lapse of cbout two years, pension of the) petitioner has not been fixed. ^ccor'dingly, the peti^'ioner' is directed to make a detsiled representation aiorg with a coj^y of this petition to respondent No.l, within a period of 10 days from todcy and in turn, rsspondent No.l is directed to examine points raised by th^ petitioner and forwa'd paper-s t-elatin9 to pension to respondent No.5 6i|ithin a period of 45 da/s from the date of receipt of the representation. With the direction afo^esaid, the petition stands disposed of. In view of this order, I|A.No.6625/2006 olso stands disposed of. Partieg are entifled forj certified copy of this order. SL'I.'- L.C. B:hai3(oo Judge (If^^fe^)