Civil Revision No.2378 of 2010 (O&M) 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No.2378 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.7.2010 M/s Goldy and Goldy …Petitioner Versus Food Corporation of india …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Jagdeep S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Civil Misc. Application No. 17388-CII of 2010 Civil Misc. Application is allowed. Documents (Annexures P12 to P21) are taken on record. Civil Revision No. 2378 of 2010 Grievance of the petitioner is that his objection that he was not a partner of the firm M/s Goldy and Goldy, was not dealt with by the Executing Court. A perusal of order dated 5.8.2009 (Annexure P13) reveals that two tenders, floated by the respondent, were responded to. In one of the tenders, a partnership deed was furnished, wherein the petitioner and one Ramesh Kumar were shown as partners. In another tender, a partnership deed was furnished wherein Gurbachan Singh and Surinder Civil Revision No.2378 of 2010 (O&M) 2 Singh were shown as partners. Vide order dated 5.8.2009 (Annexure P13), the Executing Court, taking these two partnership deeds, separately, and confined the same to be two separate execution applications viz. Execution Application Nos. 40 and 41 of 2006, has cleared the mist and has dealt with the objection. Hence, no interference is warranted by the revisional Court in the present revision petition and the same is here dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge July 19, 2010 “DK”