^SKf^Wv^, U-^\W\<i,K^wy fy *l 1*101 ^TT^ 3d^?T tRcp (<j^ljc|<^) ^200 an^wmft-TO) tTWSII^nsRqftp STBTSRflfeTania CSingle Bench; Hon'bLe w.&_ (Petition U/A 22{> of Constitution of India) PETTTIONER Ram Vil R/o Blo Sarguji tis Rai, S/o B. Rai, aged about 48 years, ^k Colony, Ramanujganj, Surguja, District 1(C.6.). Vs RESPON&ENTS 1. Stal Trifclal Raip|L 2. Contnissioner, Raifjur, 3. Collt 4. Assl (CG 5. Pro. Pari (C6| 6. Lok| yea| Present: Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for Mr. Y. S. Thakur, Dy. 6ovt. Advoca 11.11.2008 By this petition the petitio) dated 30.06.2008 whereby the pettitioner 6ovt. Boys Higher Secondary Sch^ol, Lecturerand posted at Governmentt 'CI«(n<Ill<<l<iBI'^"l^l<Sl •(Rf+^l't ^ .af^*i SIT^ST Mr. Jystice bhirendra Mishral 1] No. 5845/2008 [e of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Trifc|al Welfare Department, b.K.S. Bhawdn, ]|ur, District Raipur (C£). Tribal Welfare Department, •, Ciistrict Raipur (C6). ;ctor, Surguja, District Surguja (C&) Commissioner. Tribal Welfare [)ep|artment, Ambikapur, District Surguja ect Administrator, Akikrit Aadiwasi Vikas /ojana, Ramanujganj, District Surguja ial Jogi, S/o Tikaram Jogi, Aged about 41 •s, Lecturer, Boys Hr. Sec. School, Ra^anujganj, bistrict Surguja (C6). he petitioner. e for the State. er has impu9ned the order of Annexure P-21 ', v/ho is posted as In-charge Principal, I, Ramanujganj, has now been transferred as Adarsh H'gher Secondary School, Jashpur. BIK.F? 1 "-° XI-^.C-78 s ---^•J .isfcs<y ^3®ETT<<i<iinti, t»'al<(i<i<»,Rlril^iy *fl*le)l ^TT^ sn^?T <wp (icifjct^) ^200 W^tI<I)TR-li4) !NIT3II^?Td>*<i<b BTOTSRnf^TatI^CT •tt- Learned counsel for the peti passed just to accommodate res petitioner and to make him In-chan further argued that there are respondent No.6 for certain irn Principal of the same school. Repri been made by the petitioner in this same have not been decided till dati On the other hand, learned petitioner files fresh representatii same shall be considered and decii date of its receipt. In view of above submissii liberty to the petitioner to file f order for redressal of his grievat before respondent No.l. On suc\\ No.l is directed to decide the sa| within a period of six weeks from| Certified copy as per rule; •<()Wf(441-l <<l<<A)'^fe>^ ^fa^K ^iaif^isn^?! h'oner submits that the above order has been aondent No.6, who is much junior to the |e Principal in place of the petitioner. It was (sciplinary proceedings pending against the ^ularities committed by him as In-charge ientations of Annexure P-19 to P-21 have also |regard before respondent No.l, however, the lounsel for the State submits that in case the |n within a period of one week from today, the led within a period of three weeks from the >n, the instant petition is disposed of with •esh representation along with copy of this ices within a period of one week from today representation being made, the respondent ne in accordance with law, on its own merit, the date of receipt of the representation. -Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge