HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.17964 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.09.2011 **** Pushpa . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Vikram Bali, Advocate for the petitioner **** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner, who claims to be a teacher to teach the specially-challenged children, seek her appointment to the post of ETT on the plea of her being more meritorious than the candidates so selected and has a valid certificate. She relies upon two orders of this Court passed in Mahesh Kumar v. State of Punjab & Ors. (CWP No.9123 of 2009) decided on 14.09.2010 (Annexure P12) as well as a reasoned order dated 16.09.2011 passed in CWP No.2396 of 2011 (Bhupinder Kaur & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Ors.). (2). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought by her, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondents No.2&3 to consider the claim of the petitioner in the light of the observations made Bhupinder Kaur & Other’s case (supra) and if found entitled to, issue necessary orders forthwith in favour of the petitioner. (3). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. CWP No.17964 of 2011.doc - 2 – 23.09.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge