THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1148 OF 2010 ORDER: 1. Aggrieved by the return endorsement dated 11.02.2010 in un-numbered O.S. in C.F.R. No.4293/2009, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Hindupur, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. 2. Heard both sides. 3. By virtue of the order dated 06.10.2009 passed by this Court in Civil Revision Petition No.1102 of 2009, which is preferred by the respondents 1 and 2 herein, it is held that repealed Arbitration Act, 1940 shall apply to the facts of the case. But, the present suit is filed before the court below without specifically mentioning the Act applicable to the facts of the case viz. Arbitration Act, 1940 or the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The objection of the learned Senior Civil Judge is that the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be enforced as a rule of law, and therefore the petitioner/plaintiff was directed to do the needful under the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1940. Instead of complying the said objection, the petitioner/plaintiff rushed to this Court, without there being any illegality committed by the trial Court. Hence, there are no grounds to interfere with the impugned order. The petitioner/plaintiff is at liberty to mention the Act applicable to the facts of the case viz. Arbitration Act, 1940, within a period of 10 days from today. 4. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 25.1.2011 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1148 OF 2010 25.1.2011 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1148 OF 2010 25.1.2011 Between: A.Annaiah …Petitioner And The Managing Director, APSRTC & others …Respondents