IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 12581 of 2008. Decided on: 6.5.2011 Roop Lal & another ……….Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners. : None. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr.R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 & 2. Respondent No. 3 already ex-parte. None for respondent No. 4. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Assistant Advocate General has drawn the attention of the Court to the order dated 25th March, 2006 passed by the Additional Secretary (Co operation) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, whereby the appointment of Rajesh Kumar i.e. respondent No. 4 has been quashed and set aside. 2. Consequently, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge May 6, 2011. (hl) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.