IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 16th day of April, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 1220 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Nasima .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 139/2009, U/s 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 506 & 34 IPC, PS Vikas Nagar, District Dehradun. April 16, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. SK Mandal, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant argued that whatever allegations were made in the FIR were made against the co-accused and the co-accused Mahboob Hasan, Israr, Rashid and Salim have been released on bail by the order dated 15.7.2009, 17.7.2009, 27.10.2009 and 4.11.1009 respectively passed by this Court and the applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. He further submitted that the applicant is a woman and ailing with serious deceases and she is in jail since 16.5.2009 and trial of the case has yet not been started and she has no previous criminal history. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Nasima be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 16.4.2010 2 PRABODH