IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.401 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Sajid S/o Shokat Ali R/o Pashmi Ambar Talab, House No.710, P.S. Gangnahar Roorkee, District Haridwar ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: April 27, 2010 Arising out of Case Crime No.109/2009 Under Sections 392/411 of IPC P.S. Vasant Vihar, District Dehradun Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. B.B. Sharma, Advocate for the applicant as well as Mr. Amit Bhatt, Additional Government Advocate for the State and also perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is not named in the FIR. On 22.11.2009, the applicant was taken into judicial remand and then one chain was shown to be recovered on his pointing out. It is argued that the false and wrong recovery of chain has been shown from the applicant after taking him into judicial remand. After considering all the facts and circumstances, perusing the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant-Sajid be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 27.04.2010 RG