IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7093 of 2010 SHANKAR MAHTO . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 8.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 302 and 34 of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act is that he is not named in the first part of the F.I.R. which otherwise named eleven persons who allegedly took the two persons away subsequently deceased. The submission, therefore, is that the petitioner at best, was a member of the mob with no direct overt act attributed to him. Considering the submission for the purposes of bail only, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No. 463/09. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)