1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.135 of 2008. [Area Manager, ood Corporation of India, Nagpur] Vs. [Food Corporation of India Employuees Association Nagpur and another] ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri SR Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram: A. H. JOSHI, J. Dated: 17th January 2008. 1. Respondent no.2 is a person in relation to whom it is alleged that he being legally trained as he has passed the decree of Law, the petitioner seeks permission to engage Lawyer. 2. Learned Advocate Mr. P. C. Marpakwar has made oral submissions that the respondent no.2 is himself the party involved, yet he has never appeared in the proceedings to conduct the case himself, except for recording 2 his own evidence. It is also pointed out that the representative of the Union namely Shri N. H. Shukla has conducted the case, and the petitioner has failed to disclose both these facts. 3. The statements orally made by the learned Advocate Mr. Marpakwar are not disputed by the petitioner. 4. In these premises, no interference whatsoever is called for. Petition is dismissed. JUDGE Sbm