:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2731 OF WRIT PETITION NO.2731 OF WRIT PETITION NO.2731 OF 2007 1. Rev.S.B.Pathane ..Petitioner. Vs. Rev. Daniyal R. Bhandare & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.S.M.Kamble, adv. for the Petitioner. Mr.M.L.Patil, adv. for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : JULY 20, 2007. DATE : JULY 20, 2007. DATE : JULY 20, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. 2. The petitioner is the original plaintiff and the appellant before the District Court. Before the trial Court, he had made an application to issue summons to the witness for production of certain documents and accordingly, summons was issued and the witness also appeared alongwith all those documents but the petitioner as advised by his advocate, refused to examine that witness and get the documents produced before the Court. In the Appellate Court, he moved an application again seeking permission for production of those documents. The Appellate Court rejected the application in view of the fact that the case was not covered by any of the provisions of Order 41 Rule 27 of the C.P.C. After hearing the parties and perusal of :2: the order, I find no fault in the said order and is no substance in the petition. 3. Petition stands dismissed. [J.H.BHATIA, J.] [J.H.BHATIA, J.] [J.H.BHATIA, J.]