I CO CHHATTJSGARH AT BI'LSPUR WRIT PETH'IGN (S) N0. 1332 0f 2009‘ : Brahaspati Gupta, S/o Shri Sufal Gupta, Aged abcut 61 years, Assistant Teacher, Government Higher Secondary Schooi, ' Kodpam Development Block Pusaur, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS state of Chhattisgarh, Through the Seci'etary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur (C.G.) .The Director, Public Education, D.Ks Bhawan, Mantra!aya, Raipur (C.G-.) 3. The District Educatioo Officer, District Raigam (cc) PETlTicNER RESPONDENTS 4; The Principal Government Higher Secondary Schooi Kodpaii, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETiTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF iNDiA SB: Hon’bie Shri ‘Satish K. Agnihotn“, J. resent: Shri Chandre'sh Shn‘vastava, Advocatefor the petitioner. P Shri Arun Sac, Government Advocate for the State/respondents. ORAL ORBER (Passed on 06th day of March, 2009) With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finaliy. Shri Sao, teamed Government Advocate appearing, for. the state/respondente submits that the District Education Officer shali take decision ‘asto whether'the petitioner is entitied to payment of seiary during the period he was on transfer and he has not joined his duties, within a/oeriodotthreeweeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. in view of the above submission, according to learned counse! appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication in this matter. Accordingiy, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotri‘ Judge / HGH URT OF A ‘ . . , ‘