IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 17TH AUGUST 2010 / 26TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 25988 of 2010(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. JEZIM.B., S/O.BADARUDEEN, JEZIM MANZIL, P.O.NJARAYILKONAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2. MUHAMMED ASHIQUE, S/O.ABDU RAHIMAN, PUTHIYAMBRA HOUSE, P.O.UNNIKULAM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. LIYA THOMAS, D/O.E.K.THOMAS, ETTIYEDATH HOUSE, PAMPADY, VELLUR P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 4. SMRITHI.P., D/O.SATHEESH KUMAR, PUTHOORMADOM HOUSE, PANTHEERANKAVU P.O., KOZHIKODE DITRICT. 5. RUBEENA.M., D/O.ABOOBACKER.M., MALAVATTATH HOUSE, PULAMANTHOLE P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 6. SIBIJA S.KAMAL, D/O.KAMALUDHEEN, MANKUZHIYIL VEEDU, CHULLIMANOOR P.O., NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 7. GINU K.SEBASTIAN, S/O.SEBASTIAN, KUTTICKAL HOUSE, P.O.THRIKODITHANAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 8. JIJESH M.K., S/O.SASIKUAMR, MANGATUKOLPURATH HOUSE, MANJAKKAD, SHORNUR P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 9. LIYA ELISHUBA DAS, D/O.K.M.DAS, KOLADI HOUSE, THOTTUNGAL P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 10. KITTY ANNU THOMAS, S/O.SUNNY V.M., VETTIKKATTU HOUSE, KUMARAMPUTHUR P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 11. PADMAKUMAR C.P., S/O.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, CHONATTUPATHAYATHIL HOUSE, ARAKKUPARAMBA P.O., PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 12. SIRAJ U.A., S/O.U.A.ABOOBACKER, URAKKADAN HOUSE, RAYONPURAM P.O., KANJIRAKKAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.PAREETH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., PIN 673635. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PAREEKSHABHAVAN, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., PIN 673635. BY ADV. SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 25988 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 17th day of August, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioners seek expeditious revaluation of their answer papers, for which they have submitted Exts.P2 to P2(k) applications. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the University submits that the University would require at least two more months' time to complete the revaluation process. 3. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with the following directions: Revaluation of the answer papers of the petitioners shall be completed and results thereof published as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. The above is subject to the condition that the applications are in order in all respects. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.