IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31495 of 2008 UMESH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 17/10/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is the husband apprehending arrest in a police case under Sections- 498A, 323 and 379 of I.P.C. The submission is of a subsequent compromise on 24.8.2006 when matrimonial harmony has been revived. It does not appear from the impugned order of rejection that any such stand had been taken before the court below. The Court considers it proper to direct that the petitioner shall surrender before the court below within six weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saran at Chapra in Revilganj P.S. Case No.25 of 2007, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. Should the submission of the compromise be disputed by the complainant before the court below even - 2 - after furnishing of the bail-bonds, the court below shall not be inhibited from dealing with the petitioner in accordance with law in view of the subsequent developments notwithstanding the grant of anticipatory bail by this Court. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )