1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE MISC. APPLICATION NO.202 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.148 OF 2008 Mr. Dilshad Shabbir Shaikh. ...Petitioner. Versus Mrs. Anisa Dilshad Shaikh & Anr. ...Respondents. ....... Mr. Vivek B. Pande for the Petitioner. Mrs.Sangita Shinde, APP for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD & K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. May 16, 2008. P.C.: On 5th May 2008, when Criminal Revision Application No.148 of 2008 came up before the Division Bench, a statement was made on behalf of the applicant by Learned Counsel on the instructions of the applicant who was present in the Court that the applicant shall deposit a sum of Rs. 3 lakhs in this Court within ten days. The statement was accepted. The applicant has sought an 2 extension of time by seven weeks to effect the deposit. It has been stated that the applicant is “a struggling music composer” and that his Income Tax Returns disclose an income of not more than Rs.8,000/- per month. These facts, even if they are true, were clearly in the knowledge and contemplation of the Applicant when the statement was made solemnly before the Division Bench. The application for extension is a feeble attempt to avoid compliance with a solemn statement which was made before the Court. However, in the interests of justice and to furnish the applicant with an opportunity to guard against the serious consequences which are liable to ensue out of non-compliance of the order, time is extended by one week from today. No further extension shall be granted. The Misc. Application shall accordingly stand disposed of. DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. VACATION JUDGE. K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. VACATION JUDGE. 3