1 52 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8482/2009 Jaithu Singh Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 16th September 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr.D.S.Sodha, for the petitioner. .... BY THE COURT The petitioner stating himself to be a vigilant resident of Sohan Singh Ki Dhani, Village Davarda, District Jaisalmer, has filed this writ petition with the averments that in the year 2008- 09, the State Government issued a scheme called 'Border Area Development Programme' and thereunder sanction was made for construction and commissioning of a tube-well at Sohan Singh ki Dhani but then, under the financial sanction as issued on 09.07.2009, the said work has been shifted under District Division Maulana that remains entirely illegal and unjustified. On being questioned if the petitioner at all made a representation regarding the grievance sought to be suggested in this writ petition, counsel for the petitioner referred to the averments as taken in para 9 of the writ petition that the petitioner and other residents submitted personal representations before the respondent-authorities. However 2 neither any written representation has been suggested nor any copy has been filed nor the date of making representation has been stated. On the submissions sought to be made and the reliefs sought to be claimed, there appears no reason to entertain this writ petition particularly for the reasons that the petitioner has not made a specific written representation to the authorities concerned stating the grievance and permitting the authorities to take decision thereupon. This writ petition stands rejected. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. s.soni