1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 2887/2008 Mrs. Madhuri Bhagwan Kusumbe ..vs.. Bhagwan Ramdasji Kusumbe -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Dable, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajkarne, Advocate for respondent. CORAM: B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 5 th DECEMBER, 2008 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Perused the impugned order. The details placed on record are in fact evidence and pleading on those lines appear in the petition already filed. Further, the learned counsel for the respondent has, during the course of arguments, disclosed that the story mentioned in paragraph 5A is an incident prior to filing of the Hindu Marriage Petition. The application has been moved three years after filing of the petition. Thus, it is extremely vague and also belated. There is no reason why the application could not be filed earlier. I am, therefore, not in a position to support order dated 16.04.2008 as passed. The same is accordingly 2 quashed and set aside. If the respondent feels that narration is supported by any plea on record, he is free to lead that evidence and the petitioner is also free to raise appropriate challenge thereto. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE kahale