IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 10TH JANUARY 2011 / 20TH POUSHA 1932 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 75 of 2011() --------------------------------------------- CRA.839/2005 of ADDL. SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC), THRISSUR CC.936/2001 of JUDL. MAGISTRTE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-III, THRISSUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- K.R.KESAVAN,S/O.RAGHAVAN, KOLANGATTUKARA, CHOOLISSERY,THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.SANTHOSH (PODUVAL) SMT.R.RAJITHA RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MANOJ,S/O.BALAN,KANNAMKUMARATH VALAPPIL HOUSE, PERAMANGALAM VILLAGE,THRISSUR TALUK. 2. THE STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.P.K.SAJEEV FOR R1 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.TEKCHAND THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P. No.75 of 2011 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated this the 10 th day of January, 2011 ORDER The accused in C.C. No.936 of 2001 on the file of the J.F.C.M- III, Thrissur for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.No.238 of 2011 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsel. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) sj