IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 15TH MAGHA 1932 RSA.No. 585 of 2008() --------------------- AS.28/1999 of SUB COURT, THIRUVALLA OS.582/1992 of MUNSIFF COURT, THIRUVALLA .................... APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS:- ------------------------------------------------------ 1. MADHAVIAMMA, PULLELILAYA ANJILETHU VEETTIL, PURAMALA MURI, KADAPRA VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK. 2. K.G. MOHANAN RESIDING AT DO...DO.. 3. K.G. GANGA, RESIDING AT DO....DO.... 4. K.M.SYAMALAKUMARI, VELLAYIL VEEDU, VELLAYIL P.O., THEEYADICKAL. 5. A.J. VANAJA, KURIYANEDATHU, PERUMPETTY P.O., 6. KUTTAN NAIR, REVEENDRAN NAIR, KOCHU VEEDU, PARUMALA MURI, KADAPRA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.S.NAMBOOTHIRY RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. LALITHA @ LALITHAMBIKA, KADAKKEDATHU VEEDU, EDASSERYMALA MURIYIL, ARANMULA VILLAGE, 2. SOMASEKHARAN NAIR, DO....DO... 3. VILASINI, DO.... DO... 4. DILEEPKUMAR, DO.... DO.... 5. LEELAMANI, DO....DO.... 6. PRASANNA DO....DO..... THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J -------------------------------------- R.S.A No.585 OF 2008 -------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of February 2011 JUDGMENT When the appeal came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellants fairly submitted that over the subject matter involved in the present suit, there was a parallel litigation at the instance of the respondents, a suit for recovery of possession and damages, and the decision rendered therein in favour of the respondents has become final. The appeal preferred by the present appellants as A.S No.769/1996 before this court had also been dismissed. In view of the binding decision thereof, it is submitted, a further inquiry on the merits of this appeal will not survive for consideration. Appeal is dismissed. Sd/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE //True Copy// P.A to Judge vdv