HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2098 of 2011 Date : 29.03.2011 Between : Narne Annapoornamma. …..Petitioner And Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department & others. …..Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2098 of 2011 ORDER : In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks directions by way of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents 2, 5 and 6 in not providing Police protection to her to protect her property, as illegal and arbitrary. Facts in brief, for disposal of this writ petition are as under : The petitioner herein has filed suits in O.S.Nos.121 and 122 of 2008 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Chirala, seeking cancellation of registered gift deeds with regard to the land admeasuring Ac.7.13 cents in Sy.No.242, situated at Gonasapudi village of Prakasam District. Pending the suits, the petitioner has filed applications for grant of injunction, and on dismissal of said applications, the petitioner carried the matters by way of C.M.As. In C.M.As., the lower appellate Court passed orders, permitting the petitioner to be in possession of the land in question on payment of Rs.5,000/- per acre per annum, till the disposal of suits, with a further direction that the ultimate successful party is entitled to claim such deposited amount. In this writ petition, it is the case of the petitioner that there is an interference with her possession over the property, by respondent No.7, who is her son and respondents 8, 9 and 10, who are her grandsons. It is stated that inspite of filing an application for grant of Police protection, no protection is given by the Police. Counter affidavits are filed by the respondents, denying the various allegations made by the petitioner. In the counter affidavit filed by respondents 8, 9 and 10, it is stated that the petitioner has filed applications in I.A.No.940 of 2010 in O.S.No.121 of 2008 and I.A.No.942 of 2010 in O.S.No.122 of 2008, seeking Police aid on the ground that she is in possession of the suit schedule land. As much as the petitioner has already moved the trial Court, seeking Police aid, there is no reason to entertain this writ petition, at this stage. As the applications filed by the petitioner are pending in I.A.Nos.940 and 942 of 2010, she can as well pursue the same before the civil Court. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 29th March 2011 ajr