IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN FRIDAY, THE 6TH MAY 2011 / 16TH VAISAKHA 1933 WP(C).No. 12988 of 2011(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- K.S.RAJEEV, KAITHAKKATTIL HOUSE, KOONAMTHAI, EDAPPALLY P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. KALAMASSERY MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, KALAMASSERY, PIN-683 104. 2. THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, KALAMASSERY MUNICIPALITY, KALAMASSERY, PIN-683 104. 3. THE SECRETARY, KALAMASSERY MUNICIPALITY, KALAMASSERY, PIN-683 104. R1 TO R3 BY STANDING COUSNEL SRI M.K. ABOOBACKER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.K. MOHANAN, J. ---------------------------------------- W.P(C) No. 12988 of 2010 ---------------------------------------- Dated the 6th day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT Grievance of the petitioner is that, aggrieved by Ext.P4 order, though an appeal was filed as evidenced by Ext.P5, the same has not been considered or no order is passed in the above appeal. 2. Heard the counsel for the petitioner as well as respondents 1 to 3. 3. As the statutory appeal is pending before the 2nd respondent, I am of the view that, instead of going into the merits of the case of the petitioner, this Writ Petition can be disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P5 appeal and dispose of the same. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to take up Ext.P5 appeal , if the same is otherwise in order, and dispose of the same in accordance with law and procedure, within one month form the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment which will be produced by the petitioner. WPC 12988/11 There will be a direction to maintain status quo till disposal of Ext.P5 appeal. V.K. MOHANAN JUDGE. kvm/- WPC 12988/11 kvm/- WPC 12988/11 WPC 12988/11