HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, EILASPUR w.p.(S) “c.7155 or 2007 PETITIONER Naimish Kumar Patel, s/o latE Tarachand Fatal, aged about 34 yeaxs, r/o Main Road, Dheemarapur, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (0G). Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, School Education Deparmmnt, D . K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G) . 2 Tho Joint Diractor, Lok Shikshan, Bilaspur (CG). District Education Omcer, Raigarh, Disuict Raigarh (CG). Block Education O§iccr, Block Pussoure Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (cc). (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Appearance: Shri Dhani Ram Patel, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer, for the State] respondents on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (06.12.2007; SUNIL KUMAR sINHA; J, Heard on admission. 51311 Patel submits that the petitioner was appointed to the post of Assistant Grade‘III on 02.3.1994. There was a condition in his appointment order that he will have to pass Hindi Typing Examination within a petiod of 1V2 years from the date of appointment. He submits that the petitioner could not pass Hindi tyying examination in the prescribed time, but he has passed that examination in the year 2006. He further submits that due to non—passing of Hindi typing examination, increments and other service benefits are not being given to the pen'tioner and he is working on the substantive pay which was admissible in his case at the time of appointment. For the present, he submits that after passing Hindi typing examination in the year 2006, at least W.P.[S] No.7155 of 2007 now the petitionsr is entitled to get other benefits. However, he submits that this petition may be disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to flle a representation before the concerned authority and the concerned authority may be directed to dispose of the said representation flied by the petitioner after giving due consideration to the points raised in the representation. This limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by learned State counsel. The same is allowed. It is observed and directed that the petitioner, if so advised, may file a detailed representation along—with a copy of this writ petition and copy of this order before the concerned authority Within a period of 4 weeks from today and if such a representation is tiled, the said authority shall dispose of the same in an objective manner, at the earliest. With the aforesaid observations, this petition stands finally disposed of. i ‘ Cc as per rules. g ] y; p Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge