IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI FRIDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2010 / 2ND MAGHA 1931 WP(Crl.).No. 14 of 2010(S) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- HARI KUMAR K.K., AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, KUZHIKKATTLE HOUSE, THOTTUNGAL PEEDIKA, MOOVATTUPUZHA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE(LAW & ORDER), POLICE HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE(RURAL), ALWAYE. 4. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MOOVATTUPUZHA. 5. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOZHENCHERRY POLICE STATION. 6. GOPINATHAN NAIR, VASANTHA NIVAS, VENNIKKULAM P.O., VENNIKKULAM, MALLAPPALLY VIA., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 7. RADHA G.NAIR, W/O.GOPINATHAN NAIR, VASANTHA NIVAS, VENNIKKULAM P.O., VENNIKKULAM, MALLAPPALLY VIA., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 8. VASANTHAN, VASANTHA NIVAS, VENNIKKULAM P.O., VENNIKKULAM, MALLAPPALLY VIA., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. R1 TO R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SUKUMARAN. R7 BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM SAMSON & SMT.LOVELY SAMSON THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPCRL.NO.14/2010 APPENDIX: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1..PHOTOCOPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THEKKENKODE NSS KARAYOGAM. EXT.P2..PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 21.12.2009 FILED BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT. K.M.JOSEPH & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(Crl.)No.14 of 2010-S ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 22nd day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioner is the husband of one Sini. Petitioner submits that Sini is in illegal detention by respondents 6 to 8. respondents 6 and 7 are the parents of Sini and the 8th respondent is her uncle. We interacted with the petitioner and also the alleged detenu. The detenu stated that she is not in illegal detention as alleged. In such circumstances, we need not allow the petitioner to prosecute this writ petition. Without prejudice to the rights of the parties this writ petition is dismissed. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (P.Q.BARKATH ALI) JUDGE. MS