IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO.3375 OF 2009 Bharti Infratel Limited ..Petitioner. vs. Pune Municipal Corporation ..Respondent. Mr M.R.Joshi, Advocate i/b M/s O.P.Soni & Co. for the petitioner. Mr S.M.Gorwadkar i/b Shri Bharat M.Mehta, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM:- D.K.DESHMUKH AND K.K.TATED,JJ. DATE :- 14TH DECEMBER,2009 P.C:- The learned counsel for the respondent Corporation states that in the affidavit filed on behalf of the Corporation it is made clear that the Corporation is demanding property tax for the period subsequent from 1.4.2007. It is, thus, clear from this statement that the Corporation does not even intend to recover the property tax in relation to the towers of the petitioners within the jurisdiction of the respondent Corporation for any period before 1.4.2007. Therefore, the grievance made by the petitioner in this petition does not survive for consideration as the demand notice that might have been given by the Corporation for any period prior to 1.4.2007 is not capable of being executed. In view of the stand taken by the Corporation, the petition is disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J) (K.K.TATED,J.)