ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 5604 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 5604 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 5604 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.S.M.Railkar for the Petitioner. Mr.Ajit J.Kenjale for Respondent Nos.2b & 2c. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 19th November, 2008. : 19th November, 2008. : 19th November, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . This is a Writ Petition filed by Original Defendant No.1 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, whereby the challenge is made to the Order dated 16/03/2007 passed at Exhibit 33 in Regular Darkhast No.31 of 1999, whereby in an execution, inspite of the confirmation of decree by the Appellate Court providing the respective shares to the property, it is contended before executing Court to reconsider the shares before passing the order on execution. In view of subsequent purchase of the part of the property, mere averments of transaction is not sufficient, ( 2 ) apart from that in execution the Court cannot go beyond the decree as passed. The events as referred are after the confirmation of the decree. In view of this, I see no reason to interfere with the order passed by the Court below. 2. The Petition is, accordingly dismissed. [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]