THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.812 of 2007 ORDER: The petitioner states that respondent No.3 submitted an application to respondent No.2 for permission to construct in premises bearing No.10-9-890/1, Labour Colony, Varni X Road, Nizamabad and though it was rejected by respondent No.2, she is still proceeding with the construction. His grievance is that the representation made by him to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 was not acted upon. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development for respondent No.1 and the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2. Respondent No.1 acted upon the representation made by the petitioner and called for remarks from respondent No.2. Through letter, dated 16.06.2006, respondent No.2 informed respondent No.1 that the permission obtained by respondent No.3 was rejected. In case respondent No.3 is still proceeding with the construction, the petitioner can either file a suit or bring the same to the notice of respondent No.2. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing that in case the petitioner submits a representation to respondent No.2 about the alleged construction being made by respondent No.3, respondent No.2 shall take action on the same, in accordance with law, after issuing notice to respondent No.3. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:29.10.2009 kdl