1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CAZ No.823/2011 in LPA St. No. 18993/2011 in WP No.2428/2007 & MCA No. 12483/2011 M/s. All India Handloom House and others Vs. M/s. Ibrahim Brothers & others with CAZ No. 824/2011 in LPA St. No. 18986/2011 in WP No. 2442/2007 & MCA No. 1005/2011 M/s. S. V. Kedari and Co. Nagpur and others Vs. M/s. Ibrahim Brothers and others. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. Mehadia, Advocate for the applicants. CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ DATED : 29th NOVEMBER, 2011. Heard. The judgment of learned Single Judge dated 11th April 2008 was questioned in LPA No. 203/2008. The Division Bench of this Court on 7th October 2010 found LPA misconceived and applied the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Shalini Sham Shetty and anr. Vs. Rajendra Shankar Patil reported in 2010 (7) Scale 428. Thereafter this order was challenged in SLP and the Hon'ble Apex Court has after condoning delay gave time of one year to tenant to vacate. 2 In the face of this order, the Civil application was filed by tenant in Writ Petition seeking review of the judgment dated 11.4.2008 with Civil Application and that has been rejected by the learned Single Judge on 5th October, 2011. Along with this order, the judgment dated 11.4.2008 is now questioned in the present LPA Stamp No. 18993/2011 again by tenant. As there is delay of about 1255 days in filing LPA, present civil application is taken out for seeking its condonation. Facts above, inter alia, show that the effort to obtain review was itself misconceived. In any case, second LPA against the judgment dated 11th April, 2008 is also misconceived. Prayer to condone delay is therefore not sustainable. Accordingly, the same is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE Ambulkar.