(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 689 OF 2011 Sarvangin Vikas Seva Sanstha, Through its Chairman, Arvind s/o. Irappa Gaikwad, Age : Major, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Sastur, Taluka : Lohara, District : Aurangabad. .. Petitioner. versus The State of Maharashtra & 3 others. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. M.P. Tripathi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. D.R. Korde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos. 1 to 4. ........................ CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 28TH JANUARY 2011 (2) COURT'S ORDER : 1. The petition is filed in the light of orders of this Court, dated 11th January 2011, in Writ Petition No. 132 of 2011. 2. Mr. M.P. Tripathi, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, states that the revision filed by the petitioner, challenging cancellation of authorization of fair price shop, is pending for final disposal. In the meanwhile, a proclamation has been issued inviting fresh offers for allotment of that shop on 31-12-2010. According to him, the above mentioned order of this Court is squarely applicable in the present facts. 3. Mr. D.R. Korde, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, points out that in Writ Petition No. 132 of 2011, the revision was already closed for orders and hence this Court has issued directions to that authority to pass appropriate orders. He points out that the present petition does not contain any such statement. 4. In the circumstances, as the petitioner has not made any such statement, I am not inclined to interfere in exercise of writ jurisdiction. The petitioner shall be at liberty to move (3) appropriate application before the revisional authority and seek interim orders. 5. With liberty to the petitioner, to approach this Court again in the matter, if such application is not considered by the revisional authority, the petition is disposed of. No costs. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp689