IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1301 of 2010 1. RENU KUMARI W/O SRI MANISH PASWAN R/O VILL.- MARANIYA, P.S. AND BLOCK- AMAS, DISTT.- GAYA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI ANUP MUKHERJEE, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. SMT. N. VIJYA LAXAMI, THE DIRECTOR INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SCHEME, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. SRI RANA AWADHESH SINGH, THE COMMISSIONER MAGADH DIVISION, GAYA 5. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA 6. SRI KAUSHAL KISHORE PRASAD, THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER DISTT.- GAYA 7. SRI GYAN KRISHNA QULIAR, THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, DISTT.- GAYA 8. SRI KAFIQUE AHMAD, THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, AMAS, DISTT.- GAYA 9. SMT. ANJU KUMARI, THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, BLOCK-AMAS, DISTT.- GAYA 10. SRI SUSHIL KUMAR, THE BLOCK AGRICULTURE OFFICER BLOCK-AMAS, DISTT.- GAYA 11. SRI BINOD KUMAR SINGH, THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, MAGADH DIVISION, GAYA 12. SRI RAJENDRA CHAUDHARY, SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SHERGHATI, DISTT.- GAYA 13. MD. ARIF KHAN, THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT KARAMDIH, BLOCK AND P.S.- AMAS, DISTT.- GAYA 14. SRI SURENDRA PASWAN, THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT KUMARDIH, BLOCK AND P.S.- AMAS, DISTT.- GAYA ----------- 03. 23.02.2011 In view of Annexure – A and B to the show cause filed on behalf of the opposite parties, when the matter has been examined afresh, there is no occasion to proceed further in the contempt jurisdiction. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the fresh orders his remedy lies questioning the same in the writ application only. The proceeding stands disposed. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)