1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.460 OF 2010 The Indian Express Limited Plaintiff versus Pankaj Pandey Defendant Mr.Vinayak Shete i/by Poorvi Kamani for plaintiff. None for the defendant. CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 25th February 2011 JUDGMENT : 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff. The suit is placed on board under the caption "for ex-parte decree". The defendant has not entered appearance in spite of service of writ of summons. The original documents are placed on record. 2. In view of sub-rube (3) of rule 2 of Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, case is made out for passing the decree. However, further interest from the date of filing the suit until payment and/or realisation is fixed @ 18% p.a. (simple interest) 3. The suit is accordingly decreed in terms of prayer clause (a) with modification that further interest will be payable as stated in clause-2 above. The plaintiff shall be entitled to refund of court fees, if any, as per rules. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)