1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.04.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD)No.5336 of 2011 R.Sivaranjani :Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary, Ministry of Revenue Secretariat, Chennai – 9. 2.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 4.The Tahsildar (South), Madurai. : Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to provide employment to the petitioner on the basis of compassionate ground and to appoint the petitioner under 2nd respondent within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ramasamy For Respondents : Mr.V.Rajasekaran, Spl.G.P. ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2.By consent of both the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing. 3.The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition for a Mandamus, direct the 2nd respondent to provide employment to the petitioner on the basis of compassionate ground and to appoint the petitioner under 2nd respondent within a time frame fixed by this Court. 4.The case of the petitioner is that his father one Rajendran has served as V.A.O in Keelakiul Kudi Village, Madurai District. On 22.09.1992, the petitioner's father met with an accident and died. The petitioner's mother struggled after the death of his father for the subsistence. Hence, she had applied for job on compassionate ground. Since, she has not qualified herself, she has submitted a letter to grant a job on compassionate ground to her children. In January 2009, the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 petitioner has obtained certificate necessary for the employment on compassionate ground as from Tahsildar and submitted the same to the respondents. However, the petitioner has not received any reply. Hence, the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition. 5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the (*) Petitioner to send a detailed representation to the 1st respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receipt of the same, the 1st respondent is directed to consider the said representation and to pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period 6 weeks thereafter. 6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid direction. No costs. SD ASST REGISTRAR ( P AND A ) (*)CORRECTED ORDER ISSUED: /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST REGISTRAR ARUL To TO BE SUBSTITUTED TO THE ORDER COPY ALREADY DESPATCHED: 1.The Secretary, Ministry of Revenue, Secretariat, Chennai – 9. 2.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 4.The Tahsildar (South), Madurai. 1CC TO MR. R. RAMASAMY, ADVOCATE, SR: 15895: 1CC TO THE SPL. GOVT PLEADER SR: 16331: DM:2011::MAY:11:: DM:2011::JUNE:02:: Order made in W.P.(MD)No.5336 of 2011 Dated:- 29.04.2011 2P:7C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/