A .^0 %v lc 4^ ^ rf ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF TUDICATUKE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTBGARH) W.P.NOr ~ -'"OF 2002 PETTTIONERS .[X f'~^,/s ^y' :^^5 ^^' .^<^"" I ,<?A^" / •<v"^^e"'' / %^-y l.Sardar Jasbir Singh, S/o Sardar Surjeet Singh, aged Aged about 45 years; 2. Manjeet Singh, S/o Late Kripal Singh, aged about 40 years; 3. Harvinder Singh, S/o Late Kripal Stngh, aged about 48 years; 4. Awatar Singh, S/o Late Kripal Singh, aged about 27yea.rs·, 5. Sarabj'eet Singh, S/o Late Kripal Singh, aged about 26 years; 6. Sint. ParamjeetKaur,W/o Sarabjeet Singh, aged about 32 years; 7. Smt Kiranjeet Singh, W/o Sardar Manjit Singh, aged about 30 years; 8. Hasrpreet Singh, S/o Sardar Jasbir Singh, aged about 18 years; All are residents of Guru NanakNagar, Telibandha Raipiu- (Chhattisgarh) VE RS U S RESPONDENTS 1. Ramdas Agrawal, S/o Seshram/ aged about 56 years; 2. Smt. Ramdas Devi, W/o Agrawal *; 3. Sunil Kumar Agrawal, S/o Ramdas Agrawal 4. Manish Kzunar Agrawal S/o Raindas Agrawal fl> 5. Sushil Kumar Agrawal S/o Ramdas Agrawal 6. Neelam D/o Ramdas Agrawal 7. Saj'an Kiunar S/o Ramdas Agrawal 8. Vimal Kumar S/o Ramdas Agrawal All are r/o Tota Brand Gudakhu, Goss Meinorial K. K. Road, Modahapara Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 9. Baj'ranglal Nagar, S/o Govindlal Nagar, aged 76 years, R/o Gurunanak Nagar, Telibandha Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 10. State of Chhattisgarh thru' District Collector, Raipur. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CpNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR JSSUANCE OF WRTT IN NATURE QF CERTIORAM, MANDAMUS PROHIBmON AND OTHER SUrTABLE WRTT OR WRirS, DIRECTION OR DKECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS: -1- .r5:'<^,\ -s^ -^ww^, dTi1'yli<», facii-My '|o30/^S tffqc'IT shllcb snt'CT^T R-<i+ 3Ilf¥I ?^H •yf^I E3;i;;;i^ ^aja... Sahu 3D^T FRIWafttT S.B. Hoa'ble Shri Justlce N.K. Adarwal 14.06.2011 Advocfete Sliri Anup Majurudar, ShriYC Sharma, Advocate Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advoca foir Shri Majuindar, leamed petitioners subniits that responde suit property. In reply to above sii counsel appearing for responde respondents are not going to aliene In view of above subinissicln Majumdar, counsel for the petiticjners inay be disposed of directing fhe expeditiously. Prayer is reasonable. Accordingty, fhe writ petitioi is directed to disnose of the suit exl ct)l<4[d^<1 T:TR?ff ^ •ft1^ ^R^R; ^T31^giT3I]^[ for tbe petitioners. resnondent No. 1 to 8. :e for the'State. counsel appearing for fbe nit No. 1 to 8 are aUenating the bniission, Shri Staaniia, leamed at No. 1 to 8 subinits tbat te tbe suit property tiU decision. inade bv Shri Sharma, S1iri siibmits that this petitiou 1(rial coiirt to dispose of' the sirit is disposed of. The T.rial court pedifciouslv. No order asto costs. Sd/- N-K.Agarwal Judge ' fiNi'?fe".i IK31