IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-2785 of 2010 Date of Decision: March 16, 2010 Rameshwar Dass & Others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & Another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. A.S. Sullar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent No.1. Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.2. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for grant of bail to the petitioner in criminal complaint No.255-IPC/05 pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Sirsa, under Sections 325, 324, 323, 148, 149 IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Crl. Misc. No. M-2785 of 2010 [2] It has not been disputed by learned counsel for respondent No.2 that FIR in regard to the same complaint was filed. The petitioners have already appeared before the Court dealing with the FIR case. Learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that the petitioners have already put in appearance before the Court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Sirsa. In view of the fact that presence of the petitioners has been secured and so as to avoid making any comments on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed. The petitioners shall furnish fresh bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. The petitioners, however, shall not be taken in custody. (AJAI LAMBA) March 16, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?