IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 27TH JANUARY 2009 / 7TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 2735 of 2009(A) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHYAMALA DEVI, KIDANGANARETHU HOUSE, ALA SOUTH, ALA VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.VINODKUMAR SHRI.T.K.AJITHKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, ALAPPUZHA. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 4. VIJAYA KUMARI, ONAMPALLIL HOUSE, ALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. SHRI.P.N.SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.2735 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 27th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner complains that when re-survey was conducted, a pathway leading to her place, which is a puramboke land, is included in the registered land holding of the 4th respondent. According to the petitioner by filing Ext.P4 before the 2nd respondent, the petitioner has sought for rectification of the aforesaid mistake. She complains that the 2nd respondent has not taken any action on Ext.P4. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P4 compliant has been received from the petitioner, the 2nd respondent shall necessarily take action thereon. However, any such action shall be taken only after notice to the petitioner as also to the 4th respondent. Orders as directed above, shall be passed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg