IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2634 of 2009 SMT.MAMTA KUMARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.01.2009 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Learned Counsel for the petitioner invites attention of the Court to the provisions of Section 437(1) Proviso to urge that the petitioner is a woman and women with similar allegations have been granted the benefit of anticipatory bail by this Court in Annexures 5 and 5/a for reasons of the statutory provisions of Section 437(1) Proviso. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today when she shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SDJM Sherghati at Gaya in Raushanganj PS Case No. 55 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)