-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICTION NO. 1626 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10999 OF 2009 Babaji Chaitanya Sahakari Pani Purvanta Santha Myd. Mahalan. ..Applicant. Versus Baban Ramchandra Dumbre & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Amit Borkar for the applicants. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : July 2, 2010. P. C. : 1. This civil application is taken out by the petitioner for deleting the name of respondent no.4. Mr. Borkar, learned counsel for the petitioner states that respondent no.4 expired prior to the filing of writ petition. He further states that respondent no.1 is the only contesting party and as such otherwise also the presence of respondent no.4 is not at all necessary. In the light of the statement made by the learned counsel, the petitioner is granted leave to delete the name of respondent no.4 at his own risk. Necessary amendment in the writ petition be carried out within the period of 1 week from today. Civil application stands disposed of. (R.V. MORE, J.) -: 2 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10999 OF 2009 Babaji Chaitanya Sahakari Pani Purvanta Santha Myd. Mahalan. ..Petitioner. Versus Baban Ramchandra Dumbre & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Amit Borkar for the petitioner. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : July 2, 2010. P. C. : 1. Mr. Borkar, learned counsel for the petitioner states that respondent no.1 is the only contesting party and Mr. Kamlesh Mishra, learned counsel is appearing on behalf of respondent no.1 and therefore he requests that the writ petition be placed for admission. In view of the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, office is directed to place the writ petition on board on 19th July 2010 for admission. (R.V. MORE, J.)