IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION P.I.L.NO.47OF 2009 Datta Ladu Warang and Ors. .. Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Chetan Kapadia with N.S.Fadia for petitioner Mrs.Geeta Jogalekar for B.M.C. Mr.J.S.Saluja AGP for State. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 18th June 2009. P.C.: 1] Learned Counsel for the Corporation submits on instructions from the Competent Officer that presently they have no proposal of privatising the club/ swimming pool. The Corporation is renovating the pool at its own costs and by itself. In view of the statement made, nothing survives in the petition and the same is disposed of. However, we make it clear that if the Corporation decides to privatise or take any other major steps in regard to the utilisation of the said property, it shall give notice to the petitioner, which shall be heard before passing any such order. Petition disposed of. No costs. (CHIEF JUSTICE) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)