IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23524 of 2010 SUNIL SINGH & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 03.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 337, 338, 353 and 307 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that the villagers who were protesting against the criminals and consequently the N. H. was blocked. When the police went to remove the blockade then the mob pelted stones causing injury to the police personnels. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the villagers got agitated because the police was not taking action against the criminals. Moreover, none had got any injury as no injury report is available in the case diary. However, the impugned order reflects that the police personnels have supported the allegation of the petitioners’ side. Considering the nature of allegation and the background in which the blockade was 2 made, let the petitioners, Sunil Singh and Anil Kumar, be released on bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Rahui (Wena) P.S. Case No. 112 of 2010, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Nalanda at Biharsharif, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. Let the learned court below accept the bail bond of the petitioners after verifying this fact that there is no injury report in the case diary. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)