IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** C.W.P. No.18744 of 2011 Date of Decision:12.12.2011 Paramjit Kaur .....Petitioner Vs. The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. G.S. Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. L.S. Virk, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Ashok Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.5. Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 to 4 submits that the present petition has become infructuous as the petitioner has been taken back in service whereas learned counsel for the petitioner submits that salary of one month has not been paid to the petitioner. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that since the petitioner has been taken back in service and the impugned order has been withdrawn, the present petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. However, in case any claim with regard to one month's salary is there, the petitioner is at liberty to make representation to the concerned authority. December 12, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE