THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26742 of 2010 Date:01.02.2011 Between: Inampudi Ramesh Babu ..... Petitioner AND The Nidamanuru Gram Panchayat, Krishna District and another .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri S. Ashok Anand Kumar Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri G. Elisha, standing counsel for Gram Panchayats Counsel for Respondent No.2: None appeared The Court made the following: ORDER: In this writ petition the only grievance of the petitioner is that while on the one hand respondent No.1 is insisting on removal of his compound wall on the allegation that it had occupied a part of the road margin, on the other, respondent No.2 has not been getting a survey conducted despite the petitioner approaching him on several occasions. In my opinion, the short dispute between the parties is whether the petitioner occupied any part of the road margin vested in respondent No.1 Gram Panchayat or not. This dispute would be settled if a proper survey is conducted. In the face of the averments of the petitioner that respondent No.2 has not been taking steps for getting the survey conducted, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 to take immediate steps for survey of the site in dispute. He shall issue notice to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order demanding the fee if any payable and fixing a date for survey. The petitioner shall comply with the demand if any made within a period of one week of receipt of the notice. Within two weeks thereafter, respondent No.2 shall depute the survey personnel and get the survey conducted and report supplied to the petitioner and respondent No.1. If in the survey to be undertaken in the presence of the petitioner, it is found that the petitioner occupied any part of the road margin vested in respondent No.1 Gram Panchayat, the latter is entitled to initiate steps for removal of the compound wall after giving notice to the petitioner and following the legal procedure. Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, interim order dated 28.10.2010 is vacated and W.P.M.P.No.34139 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 01st February, 2011 GHN