IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14236 of 2010 ABHISHEK MISHRA @ PAPPU, SON OF SRI PRAFUL KUMAR MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 06/05/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section s 353, 307, 333, 332 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the Informant received information that certain Kidnappers after kidnapping somebody, were proceeding, on which the car was chased, from where firing was resorted to by the occupants of the said car. The petitioner was not named initially in the First Information Report since all the accused persons had run away abandoning the car but subsequently his name transpired as a driver of the said car. His complicity was also found in the original case of kidnapping, and, therefore, in the present case it cannot be said that he was merely a driver. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)