@ C~$1/oal/ K IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P. s No.é?lD 2011 BETITIONER: / Birich Ram Jaisawal S/o Shri Kuswaram Jaisawal aged about 55 years, presently WOrking as Head Master at Govt. New Primary School, Mudabhata Block Sakii Distt. Champa (C.G.) Janjgir- SPONDENTS: /V,1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: — Secretary, Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) The District Education Officer, District Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) The Block Education Officer Block Sakti Distt. Janjgir— Champa (C.G.) Joint Director, Treasuly, accounts, pension, Bilaspur DistrictvBilaspur (C.G.) M WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RE M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER w.P.gsy.No. 62101201 1 PETITIONER Bixich Ram Jaisawal V6I‘SUS RESPONDENTS State of C.G’ 8b Others Shri Ajay Kumar Barik, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ijaha Roy, P.1. for the State] respondents. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (19.10.2011) With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard nnally. The petitioner was initially appointed as Assistant Teacher in the year 1975-76 o'n a nxed pay of Rs. 100—150. After completion of his probation period, he was granted regular pay scale of Rs. 169- 300. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the above issue has been considered by the M.P. State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 between Madhukant Yadu and 56 . others Vs. State of M.P. and others, wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale with edect n‘om the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the etfect that the Teachers] Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. It is further submitted that this Comt while considering the same issue in W.P. (S) No. 4725/2006 between Amar Sai Ram & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others by order dated 01.09.06 allowed the petitioners to make a representation Within a period of ten days, raising all the grievances. Accordingly the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation raising all his grievances in the light of the aforesaid f? judgment and the cimular dated 5.1.2011 (Anncxune P/2), and in tuxn the concerned respondent is directed t0 decide the mpxesentation, if any, in acconiance with law, on its own merits, Within a period of eight weeks mm the date of receipt of the representation subject to veriecation of the facts. In View of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of: No order as to costs. g Sd/— ‘ J Pritinker Diwaker L Judge