IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41636 of 2011 Halchal Dom son of Lalan Ram Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 23.12.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 420, 120B and 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 19.9.2011 vide Cr.Misc.No.30862 of 2011 but a liberty had been granted to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. The prosecution case is that the petitioner along with the informant was travelling with him, in course of which his motorcycle was snatched away by some miscreants. He suspected that the petitioner on account of his suspicious activities had also indulged in this occurrence. It has been submitted that now charges have been framed as is evident from Annexure-3. Considering that there is no allegation that the petitioner snatched the motorcycle and he is only suspected to be involved in this occurrence, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 10.6.2011, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be - 2 - fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of lSri Ashutosh Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Barahara P.S. Case No.129 of 2011, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor shall be the mother of the petitioner and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. In view of the nature of allegations, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur at Ara within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next nine - 3 - months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in this period by the superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )