CR No. 7737 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 7737 of 2010 Date of decision:- 29.11.2010 M/s Johnson Controls (India) Pvt. Limited ......petitioner vs. The Presiding Officer and others ......respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. Puneet Bali, Advocate for the petitioner HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) CM No. 30421-CII of 2010 Application is allowed. Annexures P-1 to P-8 and the documents are permitted to be placed on record. CM No. 30422-CII of 2010 Application is allowed. Filing of certified copies of Annexures is dispensed with. CR No. 7737 of 2010 Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by learned Labour Court on 8.9.2010 whereby an application filed by petitioner for framing of an additional issue was declined. The petitioner claims that an additional issue “whether respondent No. 2 is a workman is required to be framed'' arising out of the pleadings before the learned Labour Court. Learned Labour Court found that the issues were framed in the presence of the authorized representative CR No. 7737 of 2010 -2- of the parties, therefore, there is no justification to claim such additional issue. On 3.3.2010, the learned Labour Court framed the following issues: - “1.Whether the petitioner is entitled to the recovery of disputed amount besides interest from the respondents on the grounds taken in the petition?OPP. 2. Whether there was no relationship of employee and employer between the petitioner and respondent No. II?OPW 3. Whether the petition is not maintainable in the present form?OPM. 4. Relief.” The issue whether respondent No. 2 is a workman or not is implicit in by issue No. 3. In view of the above, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the orders passed by the learned Labour Court which may warrant any interference in the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. Revision is disposed of. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 29.11.2010 preeti