IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2010 / 31ST ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 22986 of 2010(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.D.GEORGE, MADAPPALLY HOUSE, P.O.EDATHALA, OORAKKADU KARA, KIZHAKKAMBALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABY KURIAKOSE SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, THRISSUR 2. THE TALUK TAHSILDAR, THRISSUR 3. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY) KUNNATHUNADU, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 22986 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext.P8 order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer in exercise of his appellate powers under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act, in respect of the demand for the loss caused to the Government on account of the illegal quarrying allegedly done by the petitioner from Government land. The learned Government Pleader points out that against Ext.P8 order, a revision lies before the District Collector under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act. I am also satisfied that Ext.P8 is a revisable order at the hands of the District Collector as per the Kerala Land Conservancy Act. Therefore, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file a revision against Ext.P8 order before the District Collector, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge