: @Wahg 3&mh 1‘ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURJC.G) w.P. (S) No. 51M OF 2009 PETITI'ONERS y“ Santosh Kumar Dwivedi, aged about 44 years, S/o Shri Durga Prasad Dwivedi, Assistant Teacher, Kanya Aashram Kutru, District- B|ock—Bhairamgarh, Bijapur (C.G.) Pradeep Kumar Kushwaha, aged about 36 years, S/o Shri Ramdayal Kushwaha, Assistant Teacher, Kanya Aashram Kutru, Block-Bhairamgarh, District— Bijapur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1, State of Chhattisgarh W Through Secretary, Tribal weifare Department, ‘D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department , Raipur (C-G-) The Secretary, Mata Ruknami Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tahsii & Distt. Jagdalpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OE THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA J HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5704 0f2009 PETITIONERS : Santosh Kumar Dwivedi & another. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETETION UNDER ARTTCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’blev Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shn' D.N.Prajapati, Advocate for the petitioners. Shr§ RKBhaduri, Panel Lawyer for ‘ 1e State/respondents 1 & 2 ORDER ORAL) {Passed on 06: day of October, 2009) Heard learned counsel for the parties. . Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Smt. ALaZl v. State of Chhat‘zisgarh & Others], thus the petitioners may be peimitted to make a representation to decide their case in the light of aforestated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No. 3—Institute is a Government Aided school and the petitioners are teacher within the sanctioned strength. . Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents 1 and 2 submits that in the event, the petitioners make a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. . In View of foregoing, according to the learned counsei appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. . Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. .1 2007 (1) BLJ 265