1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 5884/2009 Mukesh Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan Dated : 10.08.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. Bharat Yadav, for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Fauzdar, Special P.P. for J.V.V.N.Ltd. This order governs the disposal of bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. by Mr. Bharat Yadav Advocate on behalf of the applicant pertaining to F.I.R. No. 55/2009 of Police Station A.P.T.P.S. Tonk, District Tonk in the offences under Sections 135 and 138 of Electricity Act, 2003. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the JVVN Ltd. and perused the relevant material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that he has been falsely implicated and is in no way connected with the commission of the offences of the instant case. The police has filed the challan in the court and the trial shall take time. Hence, he may be granted indulgence of bail, as he is in custody since 03.06.2009. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application primarily on the ground that ten criminal cases of alike offences are pending against him and he is a habitual offender, as such, bail petition may be dismissed. 5. Having considered the submissions made at the bar and scanned the relevant material on record, it is noticed that ten criminal cases of 2 alike offences are pending against him. Hence, I do not feel inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and the same deserves to be dismissed. 6. In the result, the bail petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the accused-petitioner stands dismissed. (MAHESH BHAGWATI)J. Mak/- 50