1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REV. APPLICATION NO.3 OF 2006 Vilas Hari Jadhav & Ors. .. Applicants Versus Dilipsing B. Patil & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Indrajeet Joshi for applicants Mr.S.S.Pednekar, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 30th November 2006. P.C. . This Court had recorded in the order dated 24th March 2006, the statement of the Applicant’s counsel that the entire matter has 2 been settled, the amount awarded by way of compensation paid and accepted in full and final settlement. Notice was directed to be issued to ascertain this fact and produce necessary documents. 2. Pursuant to this order Mr.Joshi has filed an affidavit proving service dated 29th June 2006. None has appeared for original complainant. He, thereafter, invites my attention to the document i.e. newly added page 64 which is a copy of the agreement executed on stamp paper and the complainant as well as applicant is signatory to the same. In pursuance thereof, two complaints, other than the one which is subject matter of this revision, have been withdrawn by the complainant and copies of the said orders are also placed on record. Mr.Joshi states that entire amount having been paid in full and final settlement and in the light of the contents of the agreement being not disputed, 3 this is a fit case for compounding offence. 3. Considering the above materials and the fact that the same have been undisputed till date, revision application is allowed to the extent that the offences stand compounded between the parties, proceedings are accordingly disposed of. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)