THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO.861 OF 2009 2nd September 2009 Between: Dayanand Mahila Agraharam, rep.by Smt.c.Pratibha, W/o.Mohan Chandra Reddy, 60 years, Occ.House wife, R/o.1- 8-478, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad. …PETITIONER AND 1. Sri B.Ashok, Assistant Commissioner of endowments, Boggulakunta, Tilak Road, Abids, Hyderabad. And four others. …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO.861 of 2009 ORDER: The second respondent filed W.P.No.20179 of 2008 challenging the order dated 28.08.2008 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Endowment Department, Hyderabad, in relation to eviction from premises owned by the petitioner herein. The Writ Petition was dismissed on 16.09.2008. However, the second respondent was granted time till February 2009 to vacate the premises. This Contempt Case is filed alleging that despite the orders of this Court, the second respondent did not vacate on the strength of the orders passed by the first respondent on 04.04.2009. Respondents 1 and 2 filed separate counter affidavits. It is stated that subsequent to the time stipulated by this Court, proposals were initiated for continuance of the second respondent as lessee. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. It is a matter of record that this Court granted time to the second respondent till February 2009 to vacate the premises. There was absolutely no justification for her to continue in the premises, much less for the first respondent or his superiors to disobey the order of this Court. Be that as it may, it is now represented that the second respondent has vacated the premises. Hence, the Contempt Case is closed. _____________________ (L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J) 2nd September 2009 RRB