TN THF HTGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATI'ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1328 OF 2005 PETITIONER r. Arun Kumar Sharma, S/o Ramakant Sharma, aged about 55 x years, R/o Plot No. B—2/39, ..‘ Lokmanya Society Rohinipuram, \v‘ "a‘ ‘ O Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh‘, Through: Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). N 3 The Director, Indian System of gx'higs Medicine and Homoeopathy of Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.). Ifwh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/ 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA x mam mm mm " Mr. YfC. Sharma, counsei for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Dubey, GOG. Ad ocate for the State/respondents. Heard both the counsel. ' The petitioner has preferred is writ petition under Articte 2261227 of e Constimtidn of !ndia. questioning the propriety of the order Annexure P—1‘,’ hereby the petitioner has been t nsferred from Government’Ayurvedic harmacy, Raipur to Governme t Ayurvedio Pharmaoy, Mopka on dministrative ground. The petitioner‘s case is that t the time of formation of the State of hhattisgarh there were six posts of yurvedic Chikitsa Adhikari in Ayurvedic hannaoy, Raipur. However, an undertaking necessary exercise, the ov'ernment of Chhattisgarh vide its order dated 2““‘May. 2001 (Annexure P- ) aboirshed three posts and held that only three posts are requrred at arpur Now, the petitioner has n transferred from Raipur to Mopka. oreover, the petitioner is not main ining good heaith as he is a Diabetic, load Pressure and spondyiitis pati t Without considering these diffiouities of the petitioner, he has been transfe ed. Learned counsel for the peti oner submits that the petitioner may be allowed to make a representatio to respondent No.1 raising an his grievances, and respondent No.1 directed to decide the same to which Mr, Dubey. learned Govt. Advocate h s no objection. Having heard learned counse for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the c , the petitioner is allowed [to make a detailed representation to responde t No.1 raising all his grievance, and in ‘turn, respondent No.1 is directed to decidethe same in an objective manner after considering all the points rai d by the petitioner, within a period of XI—HC-22