IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 26TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 5TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 31116 of 2009(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.HAMSA, S/O.SAIDUTTY (LATE), AGED 56 YEARS, CHOLAMUKATH HOUSE, AMMINIKAD.P.O, THAZHEKOD WEST, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL SMT.AMBIKA RADHAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. SR. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.K.S.MUHAMMED HASHIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 31116 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 26th day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has a regular permit to conduct a stage carriage service. The petitioner applied for variation of the permit, which application was rejected by the RTA. By Ext.P1 order, the Tribunal allowed the petitioner's appeal and directed granting of variation sought for. Pursuant thereto, by Ext.P2 order, variation sought for by the petitioner was granted by the RTA. The petitioner's grievance is that the respondent is not settling timings and issuing granted varied permit. 2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that in view of large pendency of cases for issue of granted permits, the respondent is settling timings and issuing permit in accordance with the priority of granting permit. 3. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to settle timings and issue varied permit to the petitioner in accordance with the priority of grant of permit. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2