IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-10001 of 2011. Date of Decision : 5.9.2011. Kanwaljit Kaur alias Harpreet Kaur & others ...... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & another ......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Abhishek Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Bhullar, AAG, Punjab, for the respondent-state. Mr. A.S. Gagrha, Advocate, for respondent No.2. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) By this petition, under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners seek quashing of First Information Report (for short 'FIR) No.79 dated August 31st, 2010 registered under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 474 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') in Police Station City Kharar, District Mohali. By order dated April 4th, 2011, Daya Chaudhary. J. directed the parties to appear before the trial Court and the trial Court was directed to record their statements. In compliance with the same, Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kharar recorded the statements of parties whereby they stated that they have compromised the matter. Affidavit (Annexure P-2) has been placed on record. Indeed, the dispute between the parties was of personal nature. In view of this, there should not be any impediment in allowing the parties to compromise the matter. Support to this view can be had from the authority 'Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab' 2008 (2) RCR (Criminal) 429, wherein, Hon'ble Supreme Court has ruled that in such type of cases, where the dispute is of personal nature, Court Crl. Misc. No. M-10001 of 2011 (2) should ordinarily, accept the compromise. In view of above, petition is accepted. Consequently, FIR No.79 dated August 31st, 2010 registered under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 474 IPC in Police Station City Kharar, District Mohali and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed. 5.9.2011. (NAWAB SINGH) SN JUDGE