M‘ z/§W57/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTLseARH AT BILAsPUR E WRIT PETITION (5.) No.R.\§$.../201o gmiaw AmanuHa Khan Son of la’re Wali Mohd. Khan, aged 66. years (ReTired AssisTanT Teacher), Residenf of Village Banglapara, Tahsil and DisTricT NaT‘ayanpur (C.G.), VERSUS PE‘IITIONER .‘u, RESPONDENTS STaTe of ChhaTfisgarh, Through : ITs Secre‘l‘any, Tribal We‘lfarel Deparfmem‘, D.K.S. Bhawan, ManTralaya, Raipur' (6.6.). Join’r Direéfor, Divisional Office Treasury, AccounTs and Pensions, Bas’rar Division, Jagdalpur, DisTricT Basfar (C.G.) The Assis’ran‘r CommsSioner, Tribal Welfare Depar’rmenf, Jagdalpur, DisTricT Jagdalpur (C.G.), The Block Educa‘l'ion Officer, Narayanpur, Tahsil and DisTricT Narayanpur (C.G.), WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE ' COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA. The PeTiTioners above-named mosT respecTfully submiT as under:— " i ‘ ersus tate of ChHéiiisgam & ethers er Article 226 of the Constitution of Ind le Shn Satish K Agnlhotzi, REONDE SPNTS ‘ " “‘“fPETITIONER‘” ’ Amanulla Khan V ‘ s u ia) b J 2 made an account of misrepresentation or fraud on the part of the employee (II) the employee had knowledge that the payment received was m excess and (m) the error was correcte Wtthln d span of ame of wr Learned counsel appeanng fat the State/respondents does not ‘ controvert the submissmns made by learned counsel for the etltlener e i and submits that this matter m be d osed ln: View of the foregomg and as admitted by le med counsei appeann -or the parties this petition Is disposed of in the terms of the orde Rs 9230l—tromthe retna! dues ofthe petitioner on aeoeuntof amass 2‘ aymen reb quashed. The petitioner is entrtted to tuner i r egoing, if the pension of the petitioner has not be s d a sho on p o . g l .,a,,.,f r pt e " ‘ r en