IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10576 of 2009 MOST.NAGINA DEVI & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 24.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that retiral dues of her husband was settled on the pay scale of peon whereas the husband of the petitioner retired from the post of Treasury Guard, which would apparent on perusal of the later issued by the respondent- Accountant General as contained in Memo No. 159 dated 03.06.1999 as also the letter by the respondent no. 3 as contained in Memo No. 3014 dated 23.09.1992. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner retired as Treasury Guard and still he is being paid his pensionary benefit on the lower pay scale admissible to the peon only. Learned counsel for the State submits that this writ application was filed after a long delay, as such, the same is deserves to be dismissed. 2 In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his claims, as raised in his representation, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 3 stating his claims, enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of his claim along with certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today. In case such representation is filed, the respondent no. 4 shall consider the grievance of the petitioners as raised in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the claims of the petitioner could be settled without delay. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)