IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25717 of 2011 Chandrika Manjhi Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 03.08.2011 Heard, Mr. Kunwar Narayan Jamuar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This case arises out of Complaint Case No. 390 of 2010 registered u/s 498A and 494 IPC. From the complaint it appears that the complainant was married to one Raj Kumar Mandal and in the marriage her parents had given Rs.20,000/- . For some time, she remained in her in-laws’ place peacefully, but thereafter the in-laws started torturing her and said to her that there will be another marriage of Raj Kumar, as the husband does not like to see the face of the complainant. It appears from the complaint petition that Raj Kumar, husband had already entered into another marriage. The petitioner is father in-law and there is no specific allegation levelled against him. In course of argument, it has been stated by the petitioner that he will try to settle the dispute in between the husband and the complainant. In such view of the matters, petitioner Chandrika Manjhi is admitted to bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sure ties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Gaya in Complaint Case No. 390 of 2010. Jay/ (Shivaji Pandey, J)