IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9517 of 2008 DHARMENDRA MAHTO @ DHARMENDRA KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 01/07/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. The case under sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code was registered on the allegation that two girls were taken away. In course of investigation one of the girls Reema Kumari was recovered and she in her statement has stated that it was the petitioner who has committed rape with her. Submission is that there is no medical corroboration of the statement of the victim and nothing has been found. No girl will alleged that the person has committed rape with her in normal circumstances. Allegation regarding establishment of physical relationship by force is only against the petitioner. Considering the allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail in the court below after examination of the victim during trial. avin. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)