IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No : 5064 of 2005 Between: P.Bhavani Manjula, w/o late P.Chakravarthi, 16/1263, Gandhi Nagar, Trunk Road, Nellore. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Executive Officer, Sri Tippa Raju Venkata Subbaiah Choultry, Trunk Road, Nellore 2 The Commissioner, Endowments, Endowment Office, Hyderabad. 3 A. Uma W/o. Chenchaiah D.No. 24/559, Mulapet, Nellore R3 is impleaded as per court order dt. 22-12-2005 in WPMP 17906 of 2005 .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to give effect to the order dated 9-12-2003 passed by the 2nd respondent in renewing my shop lease period from 1-10-2003 to 30-9-2006 and consequently direct the 1st respondent to execute a registered lease deed in my favour for the shop bearing No.16/108B in my name and to pass such order or other orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KRISHNA MOHAN SIKHARAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 5064 of 2005 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the first respondent to implement the order of the second respondent dated 09- 12-2003 under which the extension of lease in favour of the petitioner for the period from 01-10-2003 to 30-09-2006 was approved. The petitioner also sought for a direction to the first respondent to execute a registered sale deed in her favour. Though Rule nisi was ordered by this Court on 15-03-2005, no interim order was granted by this Court. At any rate, the period of extended lease as approved by the second respondent stood expired on 30-09-2006. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication on merits. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 01-12-2008 KLP