IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.11108 of 2009 Between: Mada Venkatesham & another. … Petitioners And The Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda & others. … Respondents For the petitioners : Sri Dr. T.K. Srinivasulu Party-in-person Counsel for respondents 1&2: AGP for Home This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11108 of 2009 ORDER:- In this writ petition, the limited grievance of the petitioners, who are represented by petitioner No.2 as party-in-person, is that contrary to the legal advice given by the Public Prosecutor, respondent No.2 has arrested only Dandempally Papaiah leaving out respondent Nos.3 to 5 from being arrayed as accused in the criminal case, as evident from Remand Case Diary Part-I, dated 27.01.2009. The party-in- person further submitted that though substantial time elapsed, neither a charge sheet nor a final report, as the case may be, has been filed by the police. Having regard to the legitimate grievance of the petitioners, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 to complete the investigation and file the charge sheet/final report before the jurisdictional Magistrate within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the petitioners felt aggrieved by leaving out of any of the persons as accused from the case, they shall be free to file appropriate application before the jurisdictional Magistrate for redressal of their grievance. Subject to these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.14277 of 2009 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 15.06.2009 ES