IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31955 of 2011 Raghu Nandan Poddar & Anr. . Versus The State Of Bihar . ----------- 2. 20.9.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in Jamui P.S. Case No. 84/2010 for offences under Section 498A, 406, 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioner No. 1 is father-in-law and petitioner No. 2 is mother-in-law, both are residing in the Bokaro Steel City in the State of Jharkhand. It appears from the complaint cum F.I.R that the prosecutrix and husband were living at Puna whereas petitioners are living in the State of Jharkhand as petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law, they deserve to be granted anticipatory bail. In view of the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, petitioners, namely, (1) Raghu Nandan Poddar and (2) Meera Devi shall be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 84 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. Mkc/ (Shivaji Pandey, J.)