1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLN. NO. 5302 OF 2009 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.47 OF 2009 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders 1.Shri D.Y. Nandedkar, Advocate for the applicant-appellant. Shri H.V.Patil, Advocate for Respondent No 2. No one is present for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3. 1. This civil application does not survive in view of dismissal of Appeal from Order. 2. At this stage, Advocate Shri Nandedkar submitted that the parties may be directed to maintain status-quo so that Respondent Nos.1 and 2 may not make any construction over the property. However, application Exh. 7 2 against which present Appeal from Order is filed, was on the basis that that the plaintiff-and respondent No. 2 are in actual possession of the property and Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 tried to dispossess them. If the plaintiff- appellant wants relief that there should not be any constructing pending the suit or that the hearing of the suit be expedited as requested by Advocate for Respondent No.2 before me. They are at liberty to make such prayer before the trial court. Date:22/09/2009 pnd/ca5302.09 (P.R.BORKAR,J.)