IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. RSA No.3724 of 2010 (O&M) Decided on 15.10,2010. Amar Chand --Appellant vs. Assistant Collector IInd Grade,Ballabhgarh, District Faridabad -- Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Ms.Monish Lamba,Advocate, for the appellant Rakesh Kumar Jain, J, (Oral) The plaintiff had filed the present suit for declaration by impleading Assistant Collector IInd Grade, Ballabhgarh, District Faridabad, to the effect that impugned notice dated 16.12.2005 issued by the defendant to the plaintiff with regard to vehicle No HR 38E- 0566, is illegal, null and void and also further sought a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendant from recovering the alleged amount of Rs.72,582/- or any other amount on the basis of impugned notice dated 16.12.2005 from the plaintiff. In fact, notice was issued by the defendant under Section 69 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act,1887 as per the letter received from the office of Collector, Agra (Uttar Pradesh) as the plaintiff had not deposited the tax with regard to vehicle No. HR 38E-0566. The defendant is discharging his duty under the Punjab Land Revenue RSA No.3724 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Act,1887 and has not done anything wrong for which the plaintiff could file a civil case seeking a declaration against the notice. If he is aggrieved against the issuance of notice, he should challenge the order on the basis of which the said notice was issued by the Collector, Agra (Uttar Pradesh). Hence, I do not find any merit in this appeal and the same is hereby dismissed in limine. No costs. 15.10,2010 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge