IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14234 of 2007 LALAN SINGH & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4. 9.5.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as opposite party no. 2. The admitted fact is that petitioners got sale deed in respect of land which had already been transferred/registered under the order of the Court. It is submitted by learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 that in collusion with seller the sale deed in question was brought in existence in order to cause loss to opposite party no. 2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances as well as the material available on record, I am not inclined to interfere in the order of cognizance dated 22.1.2007 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Bikramganj, Rohatas in Complaint Case No. 129(C) of 2006. Accordingly, this application is, hereby, rejected. However, petitioners are at liberty to raise all the points at the time of framing of the charge. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)