- 1 - (G.C.P.)J 455 (5,00,000)-11.2001) Spl-H.C.,A.S.,C.D.,78e IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Contempt Petition No.109 of 2004 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s order or directions and Registrar’s order. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri D.K.Ghaisas for the petitioner. Shri R.G.Ketkar for Respondent No.2. -- CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J DATED : 15th OCTOBER, 2004 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard. It is the grievance of the petitioner that inspite of the order dated 20th May, 2003 passed in Writ Petition (St.) No.17503 of 2003 directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to appear for examination, he was not allowed to appear for the examination on one ground or another. Copy of the order dated 20th May, 2003 passed in Writ Petition (St.) No.17503 of 2003 merely states that "In the meantime, interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c)". What was the prayer clause (c) has not been disclosed either in the contempt petition nor any copy of the writ petition - 2 - has been placed on record by the petitioner. It is merely stated that the writ petition was filed for seeking direction to the respondents to allow the petitioner to appear in the examination and that prayer was comprised under clause (c). In the absence of any material in that regard, no cognizance need to be taken of the complaint in relation to the alleged contempt of court. The contempt petition is therefore rejected. -----