lpa180.11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.180 OF 2011 IN REVIEW APPLICATION NO.61 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.789 OF 2006 Ramesh s/o Nivrutti Jamraj, Age-34 years, Occu:Business, R/o-Pimpran, Post-Kawalgaon, Tq-Purna, Dist-Parbhani. ...APPELLANT. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra, Through its Ministry for Food and Civil Supply, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32, 2) The Divisional Deputy Commissioner, Civil Supply, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad, 3) The District Supply Officer, Parbhani, Collector Office, Parbhani, 4) Tahasildar, Purna, Tq-Purna, Dist-Parbhani, 5) Gangadhar s/o Hari Dhutraj, Age-50 years, Occu:Agril., R/o-Pimpran, Post-Kawalgaon, Tq-Purna, Dist-Parbhani, lpa180.11 2 6) Kondiba s/o Maroti Dewake, Age-50 years, Occu:Agril., R/o-Pimpran, Post-Kawalgaon, Tq-Purna, Dist-Purna. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri. R.N. Dhorde Advocate h/f. Shri. V.R. Dhorde Advocate for Appellant. Shri. S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Shri. S.B. Ghatol Patil Advocate for Respondent Nos. 5 and 6. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATE : 24TH AUGUST, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. 2. The Appellant's fair price shop licence was cancelled by the District Supply Officer by an order dated 12th July, 2004, which was subject matter of challenge in appeal. The appellate authority too dismissed the appeal of the lpa180.11 3 Appellant. Thereafter the Appellant preferred revision before the Hon'ble Minister. By an order dated 28th December, 2005, the revision of the Appellant was allowed on condition of payment of fine of Rs.10,000/-. Said order was subject matter of challenge in Writ Petition No.789 of 2006. 3. By an order dated 10th January 2011, the learned Single Judge of this Court allowed the Writ Petition No.789 of 2006 by setting aside the order passed by the Hon'ble Minister. Thereafter the review petition was filed. By an order dated 13th April, 2011, the learned Single Judge of this Court dismissed the review petition, whereby the finding reached in the earlier order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition, was confirmed. 4. We have perused the documents placed on record which discloses the manner of enquiry conducted in respect of the allegations made lpa180.11 4 against the Appellant and the charges levelled. We have perused the Government Resolution wherein procedure for taking action against fair price shop licence holder, in case of any irregularity, is provided. We do not find that the learned Single Judge has committed any error. There is no merit in the Appeal and it is accordingly dismissed. 5. Learned counsel for the Appellant, at this stage, submitted that the interim relief granted earlier be continued for four weeks. Learned counsel for Respondents submitted that the interim relief may be continued for two weeks. Interim relief granted earlier is continued for two weeks from today, which will automatically get vacated after expiry of period of two weeks. [T.V. NALAWADE, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/AUG11