1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1983 OF 2009 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.153 OF 2009 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.3828 OF 1998 Mrs.Dinaz Adi Bharucha Plaintiff versus Rajendra P. Ashar and others Defendants Mr.Vishal Kanade i/by Rajiv Mane for plaintiff. None for the defendants. CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 1st April 2011 PC : 1. By this Chamber Summons the plaintiff seeks an order directing the Commissioner for Taking Accounts to issue a proclamation of sale in respect of Flat Nos.A-72 and A-75 in Building Roop Darshan, C.D.Barfiwala Road, Juhu Lane, Andheri (W), Mumbai-400 059. The Chamber Summons is served on the defendants. However, no reply to the Chamber Summons is filed by the defendants and none appeared for the defendants though the matter was called out on 30th March 2011 and 31st March 2011. 2. Heard learned advocate for the plaintiff. Perused the affidavit-in- support of the Chamber Summons and more particularly paragraphs 2 to 8 thereof. I am convinced that the plaintiff has made out a case for allowing the Chamber Summons in terms of prayer clause (a). The Chamber Summons is accordingly made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). However, the advocate for the plaintiff shall forward a copy of 2 this order forthwith to the defendants and/or their advocates. Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order issued by the registry of this Court. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)