IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12492 of 2011 Upender Singh @ Upendra Tiwari S/O Late Dhiraj Singh R/O Vill.- Narsama, P.S.- Riga, P.O.- Rewasi Via Riga, Distt.- Sitamarhi Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary Personnel (Karmik) and Administrative Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Inspector General, Registration Department, Bihar, Patna 4. The Registrar General, Registration, Bihar, Patna 5. The Deputy Registrar General, Registration Department, Bihar, Patna. 6. The District Registrar, Registry Office, Sitamarhi. 7. The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi. 8. The District Sub-Registrar, Registry Department Office, Sitamarhi. 9. The District Nazarat Deputy Collector, Sitamarhi. ----------- 02. 28.9.2011 Repeated writ application on the issues which have already been decided more than 20 years ago may not be the remedy for the petitioner to assert such a claim. Writ is dismissed as being ill-advised, misplaced and not worthy of consideration since the issue of payment as daily wager as well as regularization stood decided more than two decades ago against the petitioner. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)