1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 665 OF 2009 Tejraj Banechand Jain .. APPLICANT VERSUS Samirkumar Sudhirkumar Joshi & another .. RESPONDENTS WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.666 OF 2009 Tejraj Banechand Jain .. APPLICANT VERSUS Samirkumar Sudhirkumar Joshi & another .. RESPONDENT Shri S.P. Tiwari, Advocate for the applicant. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 13 th July, 2009. PER COURT : 1 These are the applications seeking condonation of delay in tendering application for restoration of the criminal appeals. The appeals were dismissed on account of non­prosecution as the application failed to tender 2 address of the respondents. The applicant has set out the reasons for the lapses. Applicant has also furnished the addresses of the concerned respondents. Considering all these circumstances, I am of the opinion that delay of 148 days occurred in tendering application for restoration of the appeals requires to be condoned and the appeals are also required to be restored to their original number. Applications are thus allowed. Dela caused in approaching this court stands condoned. Appeals are restored to their original number. Conditional order passed by this court on 26­8­2008 stands revoked. Applications stand disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/criappln665.09.odt