BailAppl 1067/08 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.1067/08 Boduram & Anr. Versus State DATE OF ORDER : 13/02/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Mohit Tiwari, for accused-petitioners Mr. R.P. Kuldeep, Public Prosecutor *** Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the material on record. Counsel submits that other co-accused have already been released on bail by this court u/s.438 Cr.P.C. vide order dated 5th February, 2008. Counsel further submits that after detail investigation, FR was submitted by the Investigating Officer holding that no such incident took place. But, on protest petition, learned trial Judge took cognizance against accused-petitioners. Taking note of material on record and without expressing any opinion on merits, this court considers it appropriate to allow the anticipatory bail of accused-petitioner Nos.[1] Boduram & [2] Harnath. BailAppl 1067/08 [2] Accordingly, I allow the bail application of the petitioners U/s 438 Cr.P.C. and the SHO/IO of Police Station Pragpura, Kotputli District Jaipur is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners Nos.[1] Boduram & [2] Harnath in FIR No.379/06, he shall enlarge them on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- to his satisfaction on the following conditions: (i) They shall make themselves available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when requires; (ii) They shall not directly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police Officer; (iii) They shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA1067Bail Application2008 13-2.doc