1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 132 OF 2000 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 132 OF 2000 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 132 OF 2000 Union Bank of India ..Plaintiffs versus M/s. Mithul Enterprises & Ors. ..Defendants Mr. C.D. Patel i/b. N.S. Fadia for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendants. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. DATE : 6TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 6TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 6TH OCTOBER 2004. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the plaintiffs. The suit on board for exparte hearing. Counsel for the plaintiffs tenders affidavit of service and List of Documents. The same are taken on record. Nobody is appearing for the defendants. Under these circumstances Decree against Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 as prayed. Conditional leave is granted to the defendant No.3 to defend the suit. Hence, suit stands decreed as prayed for as against defendant Nos. 1 and 2 with future interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the suit till realisation and costs. Certified copy expedited. 2 ****