IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 27TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 4699 of 2011(J) ------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. NIVIN AHAMED.K, S/O. HASSAN AHAMED, AGED 21 YEARS, SHEEN, POOVANCHENA, RANDATHANI.P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. ABIN MATHEW, S/O.T.D. MATHEW, AGED 22 YEARS, THEKKEL HOUSE, KADAPPATTOOR POST, PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR. T.MADHU RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O, MALAPPURAM - 673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O, MALAPPURAM - 673 635. BY STANDING COUNSEL MR. P. C. SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P (C) No. 4699 OF 2011 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 16th day of February, 2011 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioners is with regard to the delay in considering Exts. P1 and P2 applications for revaluation submitted by them. 2. The petitioners, who have completed their B.Tech course in Automobile Engineering for the year 2007 - 2011 appeared for their 5th semester regular examination conducted in the month of December, 2009. When the results were declared in November, 2010, the first petitioner had failed for the paper on EAU 501 (Computational Methods in Engineering) while the second petitioner had failed for two papers viz. EAU 501 and EAU 505 (Production Technology). Both the petitioners were sought for revaluation by submitting Exts. P1 and P2 applications respectively, remitting the necessary fees in this regard. 3. The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the steps in connection with the revaluation will be completed within a short while and the results will be published within 8 weeks. 4. The submission as above is recorded. W.P. (C) No. 4699 of 2011 : 2 : In the said circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider Exts. P1 and P2 applications preferred by the petitioners for revaluation and finalize the proceedings by publishing the results, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 8 weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, if the applications are otherwise in order. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd