IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN Writ Petition No. 295 of 2009 Between: M/s. Gattu Mallaiah Sons Rep. by its Managing Partner, Mr. G. Nagabhushan Rao, 16/68, Basapuram Road, Adoni - 518 301, Kurnool District. ... PETITIONER AND 1) The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Kurnool. 2) The Secretary Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction declaring the action of the 1st Respondent is not passing in orders in terms of the order of the Hon'ble Court in Writ Petition Nos.19933 of 2007, dated 6-2-2008 as illegal, arbitrary, unjustified and contrary to the directions of the Hon'ble Court and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to pass orders as per the directions of the Hon'ble Court in Writ Petition No.19933 of 2007 dated 6-2-2008 forthwith and restrain the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal from proceeding further with the hearing of the Appeals in T.A.Nos.12 to 16 of 2002 for the Assessment years 1989- 90 to 1993-94 pending passing of the orders by 1st Respondent in terms of the order of the Hon'ble Court in Writ Petition No.19933 of 2007 dated 6-2-2008. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.DWARAKANATH Counsel for Respondent No.1: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX The Court made the following: Oral Order: (Per Shri Anil R. Dave, Chief Justice) 1. In pursuance of notice issued by this Court, Deputy Commissioner (CT), Kurnool – respondent No.1 has filed counter- affidavit. 2. It has been stated in the counter-affidavit that revisional proceedings are dropped for the assessment years 1989-90 to 1993- 94 by virtue of orders dated 22.01.2009 and accordingly, Forms No.3 issued earlier in favour of the petitioner are restored. 3. Learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that till today, the petitioner has not received intimation with regard to dropping of the revisional proceedings. 4. It has been submitted by the learned Government Pleader that the relevant orders have already been forwarded to the petitioner. 5. In view of the afore-stated development in the matter, the petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ January 30, 2009 RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J svs ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KBJ}