IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6836 of 2009 SURENDRA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 08. 16.09.2009 The order dated 10.9.2009 which has been recorded in the present bail application was passed in Cr. Misc. No. 16907 of 2009 but due to mistake on the part of P.A. concerned, order was wrongly recorded in Cr. Misc. No. 6836 of 2009 and order passed in Cr. Misc. No. 6836 of 2009 has been recorded in Cr. Misc. No. 16907 of 2009. In view of the same let the orders passed in two cases be duly recorded in the respective bail applications forthwith. No modification or changes are required in the contents of the order. Now the order dated 10.9.2009 passed in this case be read as under: “Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. It is alleged that as per the First Information Report based on it, Mohania P S Case No. 208 of 2008 was instituted. Information was received by the police and on search of the body of the petitioner a quantity of 40 grams Heroine was recovered and that is why the case was registered under sections 21, 22, 27, 27(A) N.D.P.S. Act. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that it is not a commercial quantity though may be more than for personal consumption but it is also stated that the petitioner has no antecedent report of any kind which is corroborated by the - 2 - report which has been received from the police authorities. The petitioner has remained in custody since 18.8.2008 and should be enlarged on bail giving an opportunity to mend his past. Keeping the fact that the petitioner has no antecedent of the kind earlier as well as he has spent about a year in custody, let the petitioner Surendra Singh be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Mohania P S Case No. 208 of 2008. One of the sureties will be executed by the father of the petitioner on due identification by the court below and the other by a close relation. It is also recorded that petitioner will co-operate in the trial.” Let the order be communicated to the court concerned by fax at the cost of the petitioner. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)