HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. Appellants Claimants WIisc. Appeal (Cl No. 436 of 2010 1 Smt. Kamla Hariharno, w/o Ratan @ Mukesh Hariharno, aged about 42 years, House Wife. 2 Nitin Hariharno, son of Ratan @ Mukesh Hariharno, aged about 21 years, 3 Mithilesh Hariharno, son of Narayan Hariharno, aged 28 years, Unemployed, 4 Smt. Prabha Devi wife of Narayan Hariharno, aged about 65 years, occupation House wife, All are R/o Brahmanpara, Rajnandgaon, district Rajnandgaon C.G. VERSUS 1 Devnarayan @ Khelendra Sahu, son of Balram Sahu, aged 35 years, driver, r/o H.S.C.L. Colony, station Charoda Tank, Bhilai, district Durg C.G. 2 Har Gopal, son of Chaman Ram, (vehicle owner), r/o House No.49, T. Market, Power House, Bhilai, district Durg C.G. Memo of appeal under Section 173 of lUlotor Vehicle Act Present: Shri V.K. Sharma, counsel for the appellants. Shri Sanjeev Banjare, counsel for respondent No.2. Respondents Non-applicants \ MACNo. 436 of 2010 ORDER >th (12mAugust,2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri V.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the appeal filed by the appellants/ claimants for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal. - 2) Permission granted. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed as withdrawn. 4) Shri Sanjeev Banjare, learned counsel for respondent No.2, in view of the fact that the claimants' appeal has been dismissed as withdrawn, seeks permission to withdraw the cross- objections filedon behalf of respondent No.2 with the liberty of filing an independent appeal against the impugned award. 5) Permission granted. 6) With the above tiberty, the cross-objections filed on behalf of respondentNo.2 are is dismissed as withdrawn. 1 Certlfied copy of the order as per rules. ^rfteEEBfr Sd/- ChiefJustice :Sd^. ; R.N.Charidrakar Judge ^ nimmi