IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 200 of 2009 Jabbar Hasan and others … Petitioner Versus Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. and another ...Respondents Mr. Sharad Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Alok Singh, Senior Advocate for the respondents. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Sharad Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Alok Singh, Senior Advocate for the respondents. 2. This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for seeking the following reliefs:- i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing part of he impugned order dated 15/11/2008 passed by the Civil Judge (S.D.) Roorkee in Case No. 141/2008 “ Jabbar & ors V/s Power Grid Corporation” annexed as Annexure No. 7 to the writ petition. ii. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondents form raising any construction over the land in question during the pendency of the present writ petition. iii. Issue a writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. iv. Award the cost of the petition.” A suit for injunction was filed before the trial court on 15/1/2008. The Incharge Civil Judge directed to file written statement on 17/12/2008 and fixed for issues on 23/12/2008. Injunction application was filed by the petitioners in which it was ordered to be listed before the Presiding Officer who was on leave on that date and that application shall be disposed of by the Presiding Officer. The learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that the application has not been disposed of till today. After considering the nature of the order passed by the learned trial court on 15/11/2008; the application is still to be decided by the Court, it would be expedient in the interest of justice to direct the trial to dispose of the interim injunction application within 15 days’ from the receipt of the order from the Court. Mr. Alok Singh Senior Advocate for the respondents also gives an undertaking before this Court that the respondents will file the relevant papers within the stipulated period and they will not seek the adjournment. Learned counsel for the petitioner also gives similar undertaking in this respect before the Court. The trial court is directed to dispose of injunction application filed by the petitioner within 15 days’ from the receipt of the order of this Court. If the Presiding Officer is on leave or absent or the court is vacant, the District Judge is directed to make over the case to any court having the jurisdiction to deal the case. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 16.02.2009 Shiv