:1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1565 OF 2004 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders. of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms.M.M.Mhatre, APP. for the State. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J. DATED : 09/1/2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is an appeal filed by the State impugning a judgment and order passed by the J.M.F.C. Madha on 20.9.2004 acquitting the accused persons for the offences punishable under section 324,504 read with 34 of the I.P.C. and under Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. On perusal of the impugned judgment and order, it appears that the reasons for acquittal are cogent and acceptable. P.W.No.1 Angadrao has come out with the case that the accused Rajendra and Dattatraya beat him with sticks. P.W.No.2 Bapu and P.W.No.3 Bheeva have :2: given different version and have spoken about the Rajendra and Dattatraya causing sword injuries. The sword which has been seized is not blood stained. Benefit of doubt has therefore, been given to the accused. Not a fit case for interference with the impugned judgment and order. Hence, leave refused. Consequently the appeal stands dismissed. (R. S. MOHITE, J.)