IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.176 of 2007 GAHNOO PANDIT @ GAHNU PANDIT S/O LATE CHHATTU PANDIT, R/O KURTHAUL, P.S.- PHULWARI, DISTRICT- PATNA ……………..APPELLANT/PETITIONER Versus 1. BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA THOURGH ITS CHAIRMAN 2. CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,PATNA 3. SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA 4. MEMBER FINANCE, BIHAR ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA 5. FINANCIALCONTROLLER, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,PATNA 6. THE JOIINT SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA 7. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTS 9SECTT.) BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA 8. GENERAL MANAGER CUM ENGINEER IN CHIEF PESUE, PATNA 9. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, ACCOUNTS, PESU PATNA 10. ELECTRICAL SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PESUE (EAST) CIRCLE, PATNA 11. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PESU (EAST) CIRCLE, PATNA ……………RESPONDENTS ----------- 4 06/01/2009 No body appears to press this letters patent appeal. On going through the judgment and order under appeal it is noticed that the writ court has noticed the facts and law correctly and in respect of grievances of the appellant who was the writ petitioner, there is an observation that he may raise his grievance before the appropriate forum. Prima facie no issue arises for determination in appeal. However, since no body appears to press this appeal, the same is dismissed for non prosecution. (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) avin