IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 15343 of 2004 Between: 1 Gandi Rajamogali Goud, s/o Narayana, r/o Bellampally Village and Mandal, Adilabad District. 2 Nagula Malla Goud, s/o Kistaiah, r/o Bellampally Village and Mandal, Adilabad District. 3 Gurram Krishna Goud, s/o Rajamallu, r/o Bellampally Village and Mandal, Adilabad District. 4 Bhairi Srinivas Goud, s/o Ramulu, r/o Bellampally Village and Mandal, Adilabad District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Adilabad District at Adilabad. 2 The Sub Divisional Prohibition & Excise Officer, Mancherial, Adilabad District. 3 Toddy Tappers Co.op.Society, Bellampally, Adilabad District rep., through its President .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or writs, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents No.1 & 2 in not disposing off the representation filed by petitioners on 29-1-2003 seeking admission into third respondent society, pursuant to the amounts paid by petitioners towards share capital on 14-10-1996, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents No.1 & 2 to dispose off the representation filed by petitioners on 29-1- 2003; award costs. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.RAGHUVEER REDDY Counsel for Respondents 1 & 2: The Government Pleader for Prohibition & Excise. Counsel for Respondent No.3: Sri Balamukunda Rao The Court at the stage of admission made the following Order: This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not disposing of the representation of the petitioners dated 29-01-2003, seeking admission as members of the third respondent society, as arbitrary and illegal. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 and 2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 29-01- 2003 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. No costs. _______________ 01-09-2004 kdl To 1 The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Adilabad District at Adilabad. 2 The Sub Divisional Prohibition & Excise Officer, Mancherial, Adilabad District. 3 Two C.Cs. to the Government Pleader for Prohibition & Excise, High Court Buildings, A.P., Hyderabad, (OUT). 4 Two C.D.Copies.