».<• r 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATlHtE AT BEASPUR ^fc€f^NO. ^O^ OF 2010 >-^t-w*-p-~° --~ APPUC^NT : Mausdi Ayasral S/oShriGmiesh A^^wal, aged about 34 years, R/o Devendra Nagar, Raqaur <CG). Versus RESPONDENTS 1<; ^.^^.^ :^>"^ ^€. V n^ \^^ ^'v 1. Ste.tc ofChhattisgarii, tiu-ou^i the Station House Officer, PoUce Station Maudh^»ara, Ra,^»ur<C<]r). 2. Narendra Agrawal S/o Late Choullnaal A^'a^rad, a^d about 42 years, R/o Bagnaftpara, Raipur, P.S. Ci<y KotwaU, Raipur (CG). Laxmi Narayan A®rawalS/o late Shanter Lal Agrawal, aged about 74 years, R/o Bagnathpara, Raipur, P.S. City KotwaU, feupur <CG). APPUCA'IION UNDER SECTION 439 (2t OF Cr.P.C. FOR CANCELLAllON OF BAIL GRANTED TO TtSE RESPQNDEWre N0.2 AND 3 •-22 SD^T'W f?:ri??3ntn ^^-n<t) T^ '^WvW, •iiifl-y<l<»,1aRlRTg< Wtjeir •5»ittl°h __€.^. f.^<?B2//o •TT^ 'IW yi^Sil <WIW"Bftd SB : Hon'ble Shri Maainifaa Bjlohan Shrivastava. J. 06.12.a010 Sfari Sunil Sahu, counse: Shri Arvind Kumar State/respondent No. 1. None for respondents No 't'l^'il-i *<l*idi4'fetfl<i'"t<i< ^sipOTsn^r for ttie petitioner. Shukla, Panel Lawyer for the 2 & 3. Heard on admission. By fhis petition, the dated 1.1'0.2010 and 8.10.10 respondents No.2 & 3. p^titioaer Submission of leamed entertainuig appUcation for gr, b&il to respondents No. 2 & 3 offhe material on record. c^unsel for the petitioner is fhat whfle int of bail, the Court below granted ^ifhout due and proper consideration It is submitted that fhoi|i; imder Sections 419, 430, 467, out against respondents No. iUegaltly in grant ofbail. The petition appears to The grounds on which irrelevant and extraneous. In e seeks quashment of orders and canceBation of bail granted to |igh a case of commisaion of offenee |468, 471 & 120-B offhe IPC is made g & 3, the Court belowcommitted pe fhoroughty misconceived hi law. of bail M soug^it are wholty ^sence, the petltioner seeks to assail cancejlation [^•^fe'il a.«n.^ y"ia "' st '% r», I .'~s"SSsa^c-22 Af ^^^''^f sa^ sn^r'^i h-f'M Sf^V ^•H •a^a 's^ •^ll^ld-'l, 9'aly'id, ['icii'My flKCTI thliqi SD^T'R3TE!T ^f^I 7 correctness and validity or <j) below. The petition does not dfemissed at ttie admissionstA ^teserve admission and is accordii^ly ^ige itself."—s^" +l<4Ttr|41T1 •HWdf^ t^3t <^t^i< ^sriSgHsn^i rders of grant of bail by the Court ['fl^^fe'q