1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 45 OF 2009 Adi K. Dhondy & anr. ... Petitioners v/s Mehroo Ganesh Ydyawar ... Respondent Mr.J.Reis i/by Rajesh N. Kachare for the petitioners. Mr.Jaydeep S. Deo for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 27TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard counsels for both parties. 2. Since this is a dispute between a brother and a sister, attempts were made to sort out the problems between them. The main contention of the petitioner is that he is being prevented from using the hall which is permitted to be accessed by both, by him as well as the respondent. 2 3. The respondent who is present in Court states, through her advocate, that the petitioner and his guests will not be denied access to the common hall. She also states that the items of furniture which are stacked against the windows of the bed room of the petitioner will be shifted within two weeks from today. While doing so, the respondent will ensure that the two windows to the bedroom can be opened fully. The petitioner, who is present in Court, states that he will ensure that the two windows are barred with grills so that no one will have easy access to the bedroom or indeed to the flat through the balcony. The grills must be installed by the petitioner within two weeks after the windows are freely opened. 4. The statements made on behalf of the petitioners and the respondent are accepted. It is clarified that the petitioners will have access to the common hall through the main door to the flat and not through the sliding door between the petitioners’ bedroom and the common hall. 5. In view of the above, the contempt petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such. ..... 3