IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.266 of 2011 UMA SHANKAR PD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 03. 30.03.2011 Heard Mr. Harsh Vardhan Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Sudhir Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Accountant General and Mr. Md. Obaidullah, learned Assisting counsel to S.C. 21. This Court while disposing of the writ petition had taken note of the situation that the grievance of the petitioner as regarding his dues stood redressed, however, a liberty was given to the petitioner to raise his claim before the District Provident Fund Officer, Purnea with appropriate calculative details. It appears that the petitioner has raised this dispute vide a representation as contained in Annexure-2 to the contempt application and which had been disposed of by the District Provident Fund Officer and whereafter a further amount of Rs. 3,197/- was found payable to the petitioner and which has been paid to him vide letter no. 144 dated 26.02.2011. It is stated by the District Provident Fund Officer that nothing further remains insofar as G.P.F. is concerned. The petitioner yet disputes the position. As the issue raised by the petitioner concerns disputed facts, this Court would not delve into the same. However, the petitioner, 2 if so advised, may raise his claim before the appropriate authority together with calculative details and which may be disposed of in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observation, this application stands disposed of. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)