THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR C.M.A. No. 1003 of 2010 Order: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana) This C.M.A. is directed against the orders dated 24.09.2010 passed by the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in dismissing I.A. No. 2608 of 2010 in Election O.P. No. 508 of 2010, filed under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, seeking to allow the election O.P. The appellant herein has filed I.A. No. 2608 of 2010 in Election O.P. No. 508 of 2010 seeking to allow the Election O.P. contending that in the counter affidavit filed by the first respondent she has admitted that she is having three issues i.e., a son and two daughters, namely G. Likitha, G. Goverdhan Goud and G. Praneetha and that the said admissions made by the first respondent that she is having three children would automatically disqualify her from being elected or continued as Corporator and the election petition has to be allowed. On the other hand, the contention of the first respondent is that she is having two children namely G. Likitha and G. Goverdhan Goud as on the date of notification and as on today and that her husband has given adoption of their last issue i.e., daughter by name G. Pranitha to her adoptive parents namely A. Krishna Goud and A. Madhavi, by executing an adoption deed dated 18.07.2009, as such, the question of having three children does not arise. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondents. The question as to whether the first respondent has got three children as on the date of filing her nomination or not is a matter that has to be decided only after full fledged trial in the main election OP. Unless and until the trial is conducted and the OP is finally disposed of, it cannot be conclusively said that the first respondent has got three children as on the date of filing her nomination. In the circumstances, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the Court below. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the CMA with the following direction. The Court below is directed to expedite the trial of the main election OP and dispose of the same in accordance with law as early as possible, preferably within a period of six (6) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the CMA is disposed of. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. ______________________ B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J. Date: 08.12.2010 Nsr