1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.4375 of 2010 (Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Buldhana v. Ramdas s/o Waman Manwatkar and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri V.G. Wankhede, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri P.A. Rajurkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Shri B.M. Lonare, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 and 4. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 22nd March, 2011 Shri Wankhede, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-Corporation, submits that an amount of Rs.67,220/- has been paid, but in spite of that a recovery certificate dated 19-12- 2009 has been issued. If this is the position, then it is open for the petitioner-Corporation to satisfy the concerned authority that the claim under the recovery certificate stands satisfied and there is no reason to interfere in the order passed by the authority below. Shri Wankhede, the learned counsel, submits that in an identical petition, being Writ Petition No.58 of 2011, the Division Bench of this Court, by an order dated 17-1-2011, had permitted the petitioner therein to withdraw the petition keeping the issues open. He, therefore, submits that the same course can be adopted in this petition also. Since it is the case of the petitioner-Corporation that it has paid the amount, the issues are kept open to be decided by 2 the competent authority. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Needless to say that the interim order stands vacated. Judge pdl