IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15815 of 2009 1. BIDYA RAM S/O LATE DASHRATH RAM R/O VILL.- DURGAPUR, P.O. & P.S. KALER DISTT.- ARWAL Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA 2. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI 3. INSPECTOR GENERAL, CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE, EASTERN SECTOR HEADQUARTERS, PATNA 4. ASSISTANT COMMANDANT/DDO CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE, NALCO, ANGUL, ORISSA ----------- For the petitioner :- Mr. C.P.K. Rajgirihan, Advocate Ms. Alka Verma, Advocate For the Union of India :- Mr. Rashid Izhar, Advocate ----------------- 03. 08.12.2009 A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner and also a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of Union of India which has been levelled as Preliminary affidavit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent – Union of India. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that although the payments of retiral dues of the petitioner have been sanctioned except the payment on account of commuted value of pension. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent–Union of India submits that the amount which have been sanctioned, shall be paid at the earliest. 2 In the above circumstances, respondent no. 3, is directed to ensure that the amount which has been sanctioned in favour of the petitioner is paid to him preferably within a period of two months from the date of the respective sanctioned. It is also accepted that the sanction for payment of commuted value of pension shall also be sanctioned within the aforesaid period. However, it will be open for the petitioner to agitate his left out grievance with interest as indicated in paragraph -11 of the supplementary affidavit. However, the same is objected by counsel for the Union of India. Accordingly, the writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)