CR No.1145 of 2009 - 1 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.1145 of 2009 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 04.11.2009 **** Vinod Kumar . . . . Petitioner VS. Neelam Chhabra . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Chetan Mittal, Advocate and Mr. Vishal Garg, Advocate for the petitioner None for the respondents ***** SURYA KANT J.(ORAL) (1). This revision petition is directed by the tenant against the order dated 10.01.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Jalandhar, whereby, the respondent-landlord has been permitted to exhibit the original Will dated 21.12.1987 purported to have been executed by Sahib Dita Mal in her favour as well as the Sale Deed dated 19.05.1992 executed by Ram Ahuja s/o Sahib Dita Mal in relation to the property in dispute. (2). Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto counsel for the parties have been heard. CR No.1145 of 2009 - 2 - (3). The main grievance of the petitioner-tenant appears to be that the above-stated original documents ought to have been produced by the landlord in affirmative and not at a stage when the case is fixed for rebuttal evidence. (4). Counsel for the respondent-landlord states that only the original document is to be got exhibited as the Photostat copy of the Will is already on record. He further submits that the original Sale Deed which is a registered document is per se admissible in evidence. (5). In view of the above stated stand taken by the counsel for the respondent-landlord, the counsel for the petitioner has no objection against the exhibition of the original documents. (6). In this view of the matter, the revision petition is disposed of and the impugned order dated 10.01.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Jalandhar, is clarified to the extent that the respondent shall be entitled to place on record the original documents comprising the Will dated 21.12.1987 and the Sale Deed dated 19.05.1992, however, without leading any oral evidence in support thereof. (7). Disposed of. (8). Dasti. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 04.11.2009 vishal shonkar CR No.1145 of 2009 - 3 -