IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 91 of 2004 (M/B) M/s Bajaj Electricals Ltd., M-163 Greater Kailash, New Delhi, Through its project in charge (Area Manager) Deepanjan Gupta. ……….. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, Through Secretary, Urban Development, Dehradun 2. Mela Officer, Haridwar Development Authority, Haridwar. 3. M/s Philpis India Pvt. Ltd. North International Business Centres, M -38/- Middle Circle, Cannought Place, New Delhi, Through its Area Manager. ……… Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondent No. 1. Ms. Puja Banga, Advocate for respondent No. 2. None for respondent No. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner’s counsel absent. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondent No. 1. Ms. Puja Banga, Advocate for respondent No. 2. None for respondent No. 3. 2. Ms. Puja Banga, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 submits that the writ petition challenging the tenders process of the year 2004, now, has become infructuous, as the successful bidder has already executed the contract. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 13.06.2006 13.06.2006 G