IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN SATURDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2011 / 29TH SRAVANA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 6616 of 2011() ----------------------------- CRMP.733/2011 of DISTRICT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA CRIME NO.503 OF 2011 OF ARANMULA POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED ------------------------------------------ REJEESH, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.RAVINDRAN, PUTHENTHARA HOUSE, KADAKARAPPALLI VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOBY CYRIAC RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT AND STATE ------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031. REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARANMULA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY P.P.SRI.V.MANU THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. --------------------------------- B.A.No.6616 OF 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of August, 2011 ORDER This is an application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is accused No.2 in Crime No.503 of 2011 of Aranmula Police Station, Pathanamthitta District. 2.The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 450, 392 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.The prosecution case is that on 5.7.2011 at about 10 A.M, accused Nos.1 and 2 criminally trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and 1st accused restrained the defacto complainant by her neck and 2nd accused forcibly removed the gold chain worn by the defacto complainant. It is also alleged that the accused took away a mobile phone belonging to the defacto complainant. B.A.No.6616 OF 2011 2 4. The petitioner was arrested on 6.7.2011 and he was remanded to judicial custody. 5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not involved in any other case of similar nature. 6.Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, the duration of the judicial custody undergone by the petitioner, the nature of the offence and the present stage of investigation, I am of the view that bail can be granted to the petitioner. 7.The petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing bond for `25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-I, Pathanamthitta, subject to the following conditions: A) The petitioner shall report before the investigating officer between 9 A.M and 11 A.M on all Mondays and Thursdays for two months and thereafter on Mondays, till the B.A.No.6616 OF 2011 3 final report is filed or until further orders. B) The petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer for interrogation as and when required; C) The petitioner shall not try to influence the prosecution witnesses or tamper with the evidence. D) The petitioner shall not commit any offence or indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail. E) In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be cancelled. The Bail Application is allowed as above. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE cms