IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10947 of 2010 1. JAGAT MUKHIYA, Son of Ramroop Mukhiya, 2. Babajee Mukhiya @ Ramudgar Mukhiya, Son of Bindeshwar Mukhiya, both are R/O/V Majhari, P.s. Nirmali, District Supaul ….. Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR …………. Opposite Party ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manish Kumar No. 2, A.P.P. ---- 2 08.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioners are not named in the first information report and have been apprehended only on the basis of secret information receive by the police. Learned counsel submits that there has been no recovery form their possession and they were not put on T.I.Parade even though petitioner no. 1 and petitioner no. 2 are stated to be in custody since 13.7.2009 and 18.9.2009 respectively. It is submitted that petitioners are having no criminal antecedents. Learned counsel further contends that co-accused Raghunandan Yadav, who is on similar footing, has already been granted bail 2 by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.2.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 95 of 2010. A certified copy of the order is produced. Let it be kept on record. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the aforesaid petitioners are directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate (Rail), Samastipur, in connection with Darbhanga G.R.P.P.S. Case No. 35 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of with respect to each of the petitioners must be a close relative or family member of the petitioners, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the concerned petitioner. If, after his release in this case, the petitioners are again found implicated in similar nature of cases, then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)