IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.4528 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 26.7.2010 Tarlochan Singh ....Petitioner Versus Dr.Mandeep Singh Sethi and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.C.L.Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. There is no infirmity in the impugned order and the injunction has been rightly declined to the petitioner for the reasons which have been stated in the impugned order. The petitioner was appointed as Principal by the management, who is not making a grievance of the actions of respondent No.4, who, according to the petitioner, has tried to usurp the authority of the management. It is clear that the petitioner and respondent No.4 are fighting their own battles whereas the management of the school is not interested in it and the management has not sought to make a grievance out of the same. The appellate authority had rightly observed that in the event of the petitioner succeeding in the suit, he can be compensated in monetary terms and therefore he has no right C.R.No.4528 of 2010 (O&M) -2- to carry on the activities of a Principal. Dismissed. 26.7.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss