CMPMO No. 267 of 2011 28.07.2011 Present: Mr. Anup Rattan, counsel for the petitioner. There is no need of issuing notice to respondent, since the only prayer made by the petitioner by filing the present petition is that he had filed an application for vacation of ex parte stay order dated 28.12.2010, which application was considered by the learned trial Court on 24.1.2011, which passed the following order:- “Reply filed. Copy supplied. Time prayed for consideration. Allowed. Now C.M.A. be fixed for consideration. Now C.M.A. is fixed for order on 9.2.2011.” It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that this application has not been decided, though more than six months have passed. The petition is allowed and the learned trial Court is directed to dispose of the application by passing orders in accordance with law within fifteen days from today. I have been informed that the case is fixed for 5.8.2011 before the learned trial Court. The learned trial Court shall decide the application on the date fixed or within the time granted as -2- above. The petition stands disposed of. A copy of this order be sent to the learned trial Court for information and compliance. Copy Dasti. July 28, 2011 ( V.K. Ahuja ), J. (BSS)