1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 180 OF 2010 Arvind Laxmilal Pitty. ... Petitioner. V/s. M.C.G.M. ... Respondent. Mr. Vijay Pradhan with Suresh Dubey for the Petitioner. Mr. Sandip Patil for the Respondent. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 18th JANUARY 2010. P.C. :- The only request made by the Petitioner is that the Appeal before the Sessions Court challenging the order of conviction and sentence imposed by the Trial Court be kept pending so as to enable him to comply with the order passed by this Court on 23rd November 2009 in Writ Petition No.2055 of 2009. In fact, the Petitioner states that pursuant to the order passed by this Court and the liberty given therein, he has made a representation to the Commissioner of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation on 11th December 2009. The learned Counsel representing B.M.C. states that the representation is received and is under consideration. The Corporation is given three months time to decide the said representation. Therefore, interest of justice would be served if for a period of two months from today, the hearing of the subject appeal is adjourned by the Sessions Court, the Appeal shall be taken up thereafter and disposed off in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is disposed off in the above terms. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)