BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATE:28-04-2011 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN WP(MD)No.2449 of 2011 Mishensha :Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Regional Manager, Canara Bank, Chennai. 2.The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Azhaghiapandipuram Branch, Kanyakumari District. 3.The District Collector, Kanaykumari District. :Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Mandamus directing the respondents to sanction educational term loan to the petitioner. For Petitioner :Mr.T.Arul For Respondents:Mr.V.Ramalingam for RR-1 & 2 Mr.K.Balasubramanian,Additional Govt.Pleader for R-3 ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for grant of educational loan. His only grievance is that in spite of request, even the loan application was not granted to him. Hence, the writ petition. 2.On notice, the learned counsel for the respondents states that the respondents are willing to consider the proposal of the petitioner if he approaches the Bank and submits an application and after the documents are produced in order. 3.Taking into consideration of the willingness of the respondent to consider the application of the petitioner, the respondent shall first issue the loan application to the petitioner and after that, the petitioner submits the loan application with relevant records. The respondent will consider the same and pass orders in accordance with law. 4.With the above direction, this writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.side) / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The Regional Manager, Canara Bank, Chennai. 2.The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Azhaghiapandipuram Branch, Kanyakumari District. 3.The District Collector, Kanaykumari District. +1CC to Mr.T.Arul, Advocate. SR.No.15900. +1CC to Mr.V.Ramalingam, Advocate. SR.No.15897. Vs WP(MD)No.2449 of 2011 RP/25.05.2011/1P/6C. 28.04.2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/