THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA PER THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO.27139 OF 2009 DT.21.09.2010 Between: A. Srikanth, S/o. A.Rama Rao and two others ……..Petitioners Vs. M. Ganeshwara Rao, S/o. Nagoor, and 12 others ……..Respondents. O R D E R: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Prakash Rao) Heard Sri C. Srinivasa Baba, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Services-II and Sri G.Vidya Sagar, learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondents. At their request, the main writ petition is being taken up for disposal. 2. The main facts, which are required to be considered at the stage, where the very writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is being filed, are against the interim orders passed by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.6756 of 2009 with M.A.No.3222 of 2009 dated 23.09.2009. Admittedly, the petitioners have not filed any application before the Tribunal for impleading themselves as parties in O.A.No.6756 of 2009, nor filed any counter. Normally, this Court will be timid and reluctant in passing orders against the interim orders passed by the tribunal, especially, where the petitioners have got an opportunity to move an application before the tribunal for vacating the interim orders passed by it in O.A.6756 of 2009. In that view of the matter, where an alternative remedy, to file an application for vacating the interim orders, is available to the petitioners, this Court is of the view that no orders need be passed warranting interference of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioners to take appropriate steps as necessary. No costs. We are also made it clear that the interim order passed by this Court dated 21.12.2009 stands vacated. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO J., __________________ B.N.RAO NALLA, J., Dt.21.09.2010 Rns