IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. NO. M-231 OF 2010 Date of decision:10th January, 2011 Lal Singh and another .......Petitioners Versus Sukhamjit Kaur and another ........Respondents BEFORE: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Present: Mr. Amrik Singh Kalra, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?Yes/No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No Nirmaljit Kaur, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the complaint has since been dismissed for non prosecution and the petitioners have been accordingly discharged. Accordingly, the petition is rendered infructuous and dismissed as such. [NIRMALJIT KAUR] JUDGE 10th January, 2011 Shivani Kaushik