IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10516 of 2010 RANJAN KUMAR & ORS . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 26-04-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners have prayed for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 323, 379 and 504 of the IPC and Section 3(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. It has been submitted that the present case has been lodged through a petition of complaint filed on 15.10.2009 only to create a defence and put pressure upon petitioner no.1, Ranjan Kumar who had lodged a police case against the complainant on 13.8.2009 for offence under Sections 341, 323, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the IPC. It appears that both the parties are neighbours living in the same police quarters and the present case has been lodged subsequently on apparently petty allegations. In the facts of the case, this application for anticipatory bail is disposed of with a direction that if the four petitioners, namely, 1. Ranjan Kumar, 2. Mirza Devi @ Ranjala Devi, 3. Sujeet Kumar and 4. Kundan Devi surrender within a period of six weeks, in that event, on the date of surrender they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 7,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Gaya in Complaint Case No. 1989/2009. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh,J.)