1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3564 OF 2004 Sachin Chandrakant Dhumal .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondents Mr.Taur i/b. Amrish K. Baheti for petitioner Mr.B.H.Mehta, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 15, 2004. DATE : SEPTEMBER 15, 2004. DATE : SEPTEMBER 15, 2004. P.C. 1. This application for bail is filed by the applicant in C.R. 90 of 2003. Mr.Mehta, A.P.P. states that applicant is not accused in this C.R. 2 Besides the said C.R. No.90 of 2003 is already closed by filing "C" summary before the appropriate court. At this stage, the learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the number mentioned in the application as C.R. No.90 of 2003 is incorrect. It ought to be C.R.No.93 of 2003. He seeks leave to amend the present criminal application. However, he is not in a position to state whether the offence alleged in C.R.No.90 of 2003 and C.R. No.93 of 2003 is same or otherwise, nor is he able to positively state that the facts stated in the present application pertain to C.R. No.93 of 2003. In the circumstances, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the applicant to file proper application on behalf of the applicant in relation to C.R.No.93 of 2003. Ordered accordingly. *****