: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO.4 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO.4 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO.4 OF 2006 IN IN IN COMPANY PETITION NO.440 OF 1998 COMPANY PETITION NO.440 OF 1998 COMPANY PETITION NO.440 OF 1998 In the matter of Companies Act, 1956; And In the matter of M/s.Amitabh Bachan Corporation Ltd. M/s.Bahubali Electronics Pvt.Ltd., .. Applicant. Versus M/s.Amitabh Bachan Corporation Ltd. .. Respondent. Mr.Devendra Vaidya i/b.Khaitan & Jaykar for the applicant. Mr.Anil Menon for respondent. CORAM : Dr.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. CORAM : Dr.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. CORAM : Dr.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. 17TH APRIL, 2007. 17TH APRIL, 2007. 17TH APRIL, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: : 2 : . The Company Application seeks restoration of the petition, which was dismissed in default on 7th July, 2005. On 6th December, 2005, a learned Single Judge of this Court while disposing of Writ Petition No.4766 of 2004 instituted by the applicant against an order of the A.A.I.F.R. dated 19th June, 2003, recorded that the present Company Petition is dismissed in default. The learned Single Judge also held that the question as to whether interest is recoverable under the consent terms between the parties raised a question of interpretation because there was no excess provision for the payment of interest in the event of default. At that stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant herein had sought permission of the Court to file a suit for the recovery of interest, which liberty was granted. . In view of the subsequent developments which have taken place culminating in the order dated 6th December, 2005, no orders are necessary on the Company Application, which has been rendered as infructuous. The Company Application is accordingly disposed of.