1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Criminal Writ Petition No. 116 of 2009 [Manish S. Jaiswal & ors. Vs. State of Mah. & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. P.N. Mehta, Adv., for the petitioners. Mr. Anup Parihar, APP for respondent nos. 1 and 2. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 17th March, 2009. 1. Learned Adv. Mr. Mehta for the petitioners states that though the petition refers to an oral representation being made to superiors of the police machinery, further details thereof are not on record. 2. It is also not shown as to what precluded the petitioners from submitting a written complaint to the Superintendent of Police complaining inaction on the part of the local police. 3. Learned Adv. for the petitioners states the petitioners would prefer to submit a written complaint to the Superintendent of Police, and if no action is taken thereon, would take recourse to the remedy as may be availed. 2 4. In view of this statement, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought for. Judge Judge |Hedau|