IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40958 of 2010 SARITA DEVI W/O SRI AKHILESH KUMAR, R/O VILLAGE- TILU TOLA, P.S. NAUBATPUR, DISTT. PATNA.. PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR…………………………………. OPP. PARTY ----------- 2 15-11-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has prayed for anticipatory bail in a case under sections 452,380,323,308/34 of the I.P.C. It has been submitted that on account of previous enmity, parties being co-villagers, and counter case as well as simple injuries caused by hard and blunt substance, several co-accused have been allowed anticipatory bail by the District & Sessions Judge by order dated 16-2-2010 but petitioner’s prayer was not considered on a wrong submission by the P.P. that she has been allowed regular bail. There is no dispute that another co-accused with the same name was allowed regular bail and the case of the petitioner stands on the same footing as that of the accused persons who have been allowed anticipatory bail. In the facts of the case the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks, let petitioner Sarita Devi be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.7,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M. Danapur in connection with Naubatpur P.S.Case No. 186 of 2009, subject to the conditions laid down under sections 438(2) Cr.P.C. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)