IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1366 OF 2002 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1366 OF 2002 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1366 OF 2002 IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 1009 OF 2002 SECOND APPEAL NO. 1009 OF 2002 SECOND APPEAL NO. 1009 OF 2002 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders and Registrar’s orders : Court’s or Judge’s orders ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. DATED: 5TH AUGUST, 2005 DATED: 5TH AUGUST, 2005 DATED: 5TH AUGUST, 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for both parties. Perused the record. 2. The appeal is already admitted and the ad-interim status-quo order was granted. Both the parties claim that they are in possession of the suit property. However, the lower appellate Court has recorded clear finding that the appellant plaintiff is no more in possession of the suit property. In view of this position, it is directed that both parties shall maintain status-quo as on today with regard to the suit property pending the appeal. With this direction, the application stands disposed of with no order as to costs. .....