IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 5279 of 2008. Decided on: 14.07.2010. Dharam Paul Sharma. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Vipin Patyan, Advocate vice Mr. Subhash Sharma, Advocate. For respondent No. 1. : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For respondents No. 2 & 3. : Mr. Dinesh Bhanot, Advocate. For respondent No. 4. : Mr. Varun Chandel, Advocate vice Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The petitioner has approached this Court on the basis of Annexure A-5, dated 13th August, 1997. Petitioner has also made a representation for the redressal of his grievance on 18th June, 1998. 2. Mr. Dinesh Bhanot, learned counsel for respondents No. 2 & 3 has brought to the notice of this Court that in fact the petitioner already stands promoted to the higher post of Data Entry Operator. Since the grievance of the petitioner stands 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. redressed, the present petition has become infructuous. Disposed of as infructuous. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 14, 2010. (bhupender)