1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 554/2008 (Chandra Shekhar Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 20/02/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Vineet Jain for the petitioner. Mr. J.P.S.Choudhary, Public Prosecutor. Mr. Ajay Vyas for the complainant. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State as also counsel appearing for the first informant. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the pattas are not forged since they have been issued by Gram Panchayat and from police investigation diary it no where appears that the pattas are forged. Learned counsel submits that an agreement was entered into and there were terms and conditions and it is stipulated in the agreement that as per the terms and conditions the purchaser complainant was to get the document registered which he failed. A notice was issued to the complainant for getting the document registered which they failed. Be that as it may, the execution of the agreement and the receipt of the amount have not been disputed. In the circumstances therefore, without commenting on the merit of the case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. 2 Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Chandra Shekhar S/o Dasi Maharaj be released on bail in FIR No. 261/06 P.S. Ganga Shahar, district Bikaner, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP