IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 24113 of 2008 Between: M.R.M. College of Pharmacy of Mohd. Rafiuddin Memorial Educational Society, Rep. by its Secretary/ Correspondent Mohd. Habeebuddin. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Member Secretary, Committe to Oversee of CET (Common Entrace Test) by the Association of Private Unaided Professional Colleges and Allied Matters, Ganganvihar, Hyderabad. 2 The Chairman, A.P. State Council for Higher Education, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 3 The Convenor, EAMCET-2008 single Window-I, Sankethika Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 4 The Convenor, EAMCET-2008 single Window-II, Sankethika Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ or order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus contemplating to cancel the allotment of 19 students made by the respondent No.4 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, besides violative of Principles of natural Justice; while issuing aconsequential direction to the respondents in general and to the respondent No.3 in particular not to allot any candidate to the petitioner college in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.GOVERDHANACHARY Counsel for the Respondent No.: C.SUDESH ANAND(SC FOR APSCHE) The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 24113 OF 2008 ORDER: Sri C.Sudesh Anand who accepted notice for respondent No.2, under instructions stated that the representation of the petitioner was considered and disposed of and the same was communicated to the petitioner by letter dated 03.11.2008. A copy of the said letter has also been placed before this court. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In the circumstances, no further enquiry is necessary. The writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 03.11.2008, if the petitioner so chooses. No costs. ____________ (G. ROHINI, J.) 30.04.2009 Stp ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SPJS}