1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 309 OF 1997 The State of Maharashtra ........Appellant versus Ghustin J. Soz & ors ........Respondents. Ms. V.S. Mhaispurkar APP for the Appellant. Mr. Amogh Karandikar adv. for the Respondent. CORAM: B. R. GAVAI,J. DATED : 30th August, 2010. P.C.: 1. By consent the appeal is taken up for final hearing. Heard Mr. Karandikar the learned counsel for the respondent and Ms. Mhaispurkar the learned APP for State. 2. The present appeal challenges the judgment and award passed by the learned Jt. Civil Judge S.D. Ratnagiri dated 14-9-1996 in Land Acquisition Reference No. 18/93. The Land admeasuring 1H. 90.2R. belonging to the appellant has been acquired. The notification under sec. 4 was issued on 1-9-1989. The collector had determined the compensation at Rs. 37803/-. Being aggreived thereby a reference has been preferred by the present appellant. The reference has been allowed and the compensation has been granted at the rate of Rs. 1000/- per R. 3. A Division Bench of this court in F.A. No. 150/96 in case 2 of similarly situated land, which was acquired for the same public purposes has granted compensation at the rate of Rs. 1000/- per R cannot be said to be unreaonsble. The appeal therefore has been dismissed by a reasoned order. In that view of the matter the present First Appeal also is required to be dismissed. The same is therefore dismissed. 7. In view of the dismissal of the first appeal civil application no. 2260/97 does not survive and the same is also dismissed. (B. R. GAVAI, J.) 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6956 OF 1997 in FIRST APPEAL NO. 309 OF 1997 The State of Maharashtra ........Appellant versus Ghustin J. Soz & ors ........Respondents. Ms. V.S. Mhaispurkar APP for the Appellant. Mr. Amogh Karandikar adv. for the Respondent. CORAM: B. R. GAVAI,J. DATED : 30th August, 2010. P.C.: 1. This is an application for withdrawal of the amount deposited by the appellant in the trial court. Since the appeal itself has been dismissed, the respondent would be at liberty to withdraw the amount. Civil Application is therefore disposed of. (B. R. GAVAI, J.)