HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 471 of 2005 (S/S) Ramesh Chandra Chauhan …. Petitioner .. Versus State of Uttaranchal & others … Respondents Mr. B.D. Upadhyay, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent nos. 1 and 2. 3rd November, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. This writ petition was earlier connected with the writ petition no. 864 of 2009 (S/S)( which has been dismissed vide order dated 3.11.2009 (for orders, see order dated 3.11.2009 passed on separate sheet). Statement has already been made by learned counsel for the petitioner Sri B.D. Upadhyay that the cause of action in the present writ petitions no more survives and, therefore, the writ petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. On the basis of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 3.11.2009 Avneet