IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2010 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 20053 of 2008(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- V.R.OJESS, ADVOCATE, AGED 45, S/O.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, NEAR POLICE STATION, PERUMBAVOOR. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM CIVIL STATION BUILDING, KAKKANAD, KOCHI - 682 030. 2. THE SECRETARY, PERUMBAVOOR MUNICIPALITY MUNICIPAL OFFICE, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. HEALTH INSPECTOR, PERUMBAVOOR MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, PERUMBAVOOR. 5. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PERUMBAVOOR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.RANI DIOTHIMA ADV. SRI.V.M.KURIAN FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 20053 of 2008 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 28/06/2008 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE MASS PETITION DATED 20/06/2008 SUBMITTED BY THE LOCAL PEOPLE EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS ITEM REPORTED IN FLASH NEWSPAPER DAILY DATED 13/06/2008. SECOND RESPONDENT'S EXTS: EXT.R2(a) TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATE25/06/2008 SERVED ON THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUMBAVOOR. EXT.R2(b) TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 25/06/2008 SERVED ON SUB INSPECTOR, PERUMBAVOOR EXT.R3(c) TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 27/06/2008 ISSUED TO THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD, PERUMBAVOOR \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.20053/2008-K ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 21st day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, an Advocate of Moovattupuzha- Perumbavoor Bar Association is having his office right in front of the Court Complex, Perumbavoor. Many offices are functioning in the same building. Alleging nuisance due to the over spilling of latrine to the road, the petitioner has moved the various authorities and failing to get any positive action, this writ petition has been filed seeking for various reliefs. In the statement filed by the second respondent, it is stated that the second respondent on receipt of the complaint regarding the matter, ascertained the facts through an inspection by the Health Department and, thereafter, issued notices to the Sub Registrar and the Sub Inspector of Police to take immediate steps to abate the nuisance. 2. In the light of the above, as steps have been taken by the second respondent, no further orders are called for in the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to conduct W.P.(C). No.20053/2008 -:2:- a fresh inspection also to find out whether there is any nuisance as on today and if such nuisance exists, he will have to report the same to the concerned authorities for further action. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms