Civil Revision No. 915 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 915 of 2011 Date of Decision: 25.5.2011 *** Vijay Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Ram Sarup & Ors. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Chadwal, Advocate for respondent No.1. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The application of the petitioner-plaintiff to produce additional evidence to rebut the evidence produced by the defendants, has been dismissed by the Court below by virtue of order dated 19.1.2011, leading to the institution of the present civil revision. Heard. The plea of the plaintiff is that to prove issues No.2 and 3, the onus was put on the defendants and by way of evidence sought to be produced, he wants to rebut the evidence produced by the defendant. The dispute is regarding the property, which the plaintiff claims is in khasra No.277. A specific issue No.1 was framed in this regard, the onus to prove the same was put on the plaintiff. He led the evidence in affirmative. The defendants on the other hand claimed that the suit property is part of killa No.53//20, for which issue No.2 was framed and onus to prove the same was put on the defendants. They produced the evidence in this regard. The plea which the plaintiff raised was required to be proved in affirmative alone and not by way of rebuttal evidence that too in respect of the evidence Civil Revision No. 915 of 2011 2 produced by the defendants in respect of issues, the onus of proving which was on the defendants. There is no illegality or perversity in the impugned order passed by the Court below. Dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE May 25, 2011 Jiten