IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13950 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 09, 2010. Manjit Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Veneet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner who is working on seasonal basis with respondent No.3-Sugar Mill, seeks a mandamus to direct respondent Nos.2 & 3 to grant him the status of Permanent Regular Clerk from the date his juniors have been allegedly promoted. In this regard, the petitioner is said to have served the respondents with a legal notice dated 23.2.2009 (Annexure P-1) but without any response thereto. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to respondent nos.2 & 3 to consider the petitioner's pending claim, as contained in the C.W.P.No .13950 of 2010 2 legal notice dated 23.2.2009 (Annexure P-1) and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 09, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE