IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10161 of 2009 KAMLESH SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 27.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Police case under Section 273 of the Penal Code and Section 47(A) of the Excise Act. It is submitted that he is the owner of the brick kiln. There is no boundary wall. The thatched hut is open and accessible to all. The petitioner was not found on the spot. His is not concerned with the alleged spirit recovered, unknown to the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 11/09, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Before finally accepting his bail bonds, the Court below shall call for his antecedent report and only in the event of a negative report shall the bail bonds be confirmed. If the petitioner is found to have antecedents, the present application shall be deemed to have been rejected when he shall be taken into custody. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)