IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.655 of 2011 1. Most.Bhagwati Devi wife of Late Singheshwar Mandal. 2. Amirudh Prasad Mandal son of late Singheshwar Mandal 3. Gopal Mandal. 4. Ranjeet Mandal, both minor sons of Late Singheshwar Mandal, under the guardianship of their mother and natural guardian Most. Bhagwati Devi, All residents of village Sardho P.S. Sabour, District-Bhagalpur………………(Petitioners)……………Appellants Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Collector, Bhagalpur. 2. District Development Commissioner, Zila Parishad, Bhagalpur. 3. Anchal Adhikari, Sabour Anchal, P.S. Sabour District Bhagalpur………………(Respondents 1st Party) ………Respondents 1st party. 4. Bijay Kumar Singh son of Late Yugal Kishore Singh. 5. Smt. Hira Devi wife of Bijay Kumar Singh both residents of Mohalla Jawaripur, P.S. Tilkamanjhi, District- Bhagalpur……….(Respondents 2nd party)……………………………...Respondents 2nd parties. ----------- 2. 04.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the appellant. He wanted to take us into the merits of the matter, but we find that the writ petition was in effect a petition invoking powers of superintendence of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India because in the given situation the order passed by the civil court in a suit could not have been challenged under civil revisional jurisdiction. Learned single judge by the impugned order has dismissed the writ petition of the appellant. We are not going into the merits of the matter because there are more than one Division Bench judgments of this Court holding that no appeal is entertainable under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent Appeal of this Court against the order passed by a single judge in exercise of power of 2 superintendence under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. Jay/ (Shiva Kirti Singh,J) (Shivaji Pandey, J)