IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12831 of 2009 BINAY PASWAN, son of Ram Deo Paswan, village Bharub Tola, Hariharganj, PS Obra, Dist. Aurangabad. Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.13535 of 2009 MITHILESH PASWAN, son of Makarat Paswan, village Gaytri Mandir By Pass Road, PS and Dist. Aurangabad. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.1972 of 2009 VINESH KUMAR @ CHHOTKA DIESH, son of Sri Ram Paswan, village Bharoob Tole Hariharganj, PS Obra, District Aurangabad. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are accused in a case under section 394 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the recovery of mobile sets does not match with the mobile sets that was stolen during the occurrence. However, considering the fact that the petitioners have criminal history which indicates that they are involved in similar crimes, I am not inclined to grant bail. These applications are dismissed. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)