1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.188/2009. (Abdul Saleem s/o Abdul Samad and Ors. Vs. Majlese Madarsa Islahul Amal and Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Vivek Dhage, Adv. For petitioners; *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 19 th November, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) The petitioners herein have specific stand that they have no concern with the right vested in the property, for which litigation is going on. They have not objected to status of the plaintiffs, if the plaintiff has independent rights against other defendants. In the light of this statement, as is spelt out in paragraph 9 of the present CRA and also flowing in the Written Statement moved in RCS No. 661/2005, it is apparent that the petitioners(defendants) are not parties at the issue and consequently, in terms of order 15 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, their presence being not warranted, the proceedings should not be continued against them. The petitioners/defendants nos.2, 3, 5 and 6 2 are permitted to be omitted from the array of the defendants in RCS No. 661/2005 pending on the file of learned Civil Judge,Junior Division, Nanded. 3) CRA allowed to the extent indicated above. 4) No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/