IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.896 of 2001 Date of Decision 30.07.2010 State of Punjab ...... Petitioner VERSUS Jai Singh ...... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Amit Chaudhary, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab. None for the respondent. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL): The petitioner-State has preferred this petition against the order dated 24.08.2000, passed by Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khanna, where the respondent-accused (herein referred as 'the accused') has not been charged under Section 420 IPC. There is no evidence to prove the offence under Section 420 IPC for which the State has sought to charge the accused. The FIR was recorded against the accused under Sections 63 of the Copy Right Act, 78 and 79 of Trade and Merchandise Mark Act, 1958 and 420 IPC. However, in the absence of any evidence to the effect that he deceived and induced any person to deliver any property, the charge under Section 420 IPC has not been framed against him. Resultantly, finding no merit in the petition, the same is dismissed. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 30.07.2010 mamta-II