IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CASE NO.: Crl.M. No.M-52996 of 2007 DATE OF DECISION: March 27, 2009 DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE, ...PETITIONER LUDHIANA VERSUS KULBHUSHAN GOYAL ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA. PRESENT: MR. KAMAL SEHGAL, SR. PANEL COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER. MR. R.S. BAINS, ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT. ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J.(ORAL) The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence has filed this petition under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the respondent Sh. Kulbhushan Goyal vide order dated 6.3.2006. Sh. Kulbhushan Goyal filed a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail for offence allegedly committed under Section 135 of the Customs Act. This Court vide detailed order dated 6.3.2006, granted anticipatory bail to Sh. Kulbhushan Goyal on the condition that he would join the investigation as and when called for by the Department. Mr. Kamal Sehgal, counsel for the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence contends that Sh. Kulbhushan Goyal has appeared only on three dates before the Investigating Officer and has not been appearing after October, 2006 and as many as 10 notices have been issued to him. Crl.M. No.M-52996 of 2007 -2- Mr. R.S. Bains, counsel for the respondent, however, submits that the respondent has appeared before the Investigating Officer on numerous occasions and that the respondent is still ready and willing to join the investigation as and when called for. Mr. Sehgal states that the respondent-Kulbhushan Goyal who is present in Court be directed to appear in the next week. After hearing the counsel for the parties, I am of the considered opinion that the Sh. Kulbhushan Goyal has not violated the order vide which anticipatory bail was granted to him by this Court. He shall, however, appear in the office of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Ludhiana on 1.4.2009 at 11.00 A.M. The respondent shall also submit his present address to the Investigating Officer, so that, if need be, he can be called again. Crl.M. is disposed of in the above terms. Copy of the order be given dasti. March 27, 2009 (ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA) Gulati JUDGE