1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1903 OF 2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1245 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Central – II, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Omprakash & Company. ..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.P.C. Tripathi i/by Mr.A.K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2009 P.C. : 1, Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. The delay of about 668 days in filing the appeal has not been properly explained. Learned counsel for the respondent has vehemently argued that the delay cannot be condoned. Accepting the arguments advanced that the delay cannot be condoned, we endorse that no sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Hence, the notice of motion for condonation of delay is rejected. 2. Appeal papers be consigned to the record department. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)