1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4025/1997 Rameshwar Lal Vs. M/s Hindustan Zink Ltd. & Anr. Date of Order :: 26.03.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr R.N. Upadhyaya, for the petitioner. Mr J.P. Bhardwaj for Mr T. Gupta, for the respondents. ... The Labour Court, Udaipur by its award dated 29.2.1984 answered reference made to it by the appropriate government on 7.1.1983 by holding removal of the petitioner from service w.e.f. 15.5.1982 illegal. Accordingly, a direction was given for his reinstatement in service with all back-wages. A petition for writ giving challenge to the award aforesaid also came to be rejected by Single Bench of this Court on 6.12.1985. A special appeal preferred by the employer giving challenge to the judgment dated 6.12.1985 also came to be rejected on 12.12.1986. However, Supreme Court by its order dated 29.8.1996 modified the award dated 29.2.1984 only to the extent of the quantum of back-wages. The respondent-employer has already reinstated the workman and also paid a sum of Rs.96,078/- against 50% of back-wages and certain other dues of the petitioner. By this petition for writ claim of the petitioner is that the amount paid is not in consonance with entitlement of the petitioner. A 2 direction, therefore, is sought for respondents to make payment of bonus, attendance incentive and production incentive, gift material such as alarm clock, silver coins, silver plates, steel utensils, payment towards break-fast etc. Whatever claim made by the petitioner, that can very well be determined in the terms of money. If the petitioner is having any entitlement regarding the claims made by him it is open for him to get the same settled by initiating proceedings under Section 33(c)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. As a matter of fact, the reliefs claimed by the petitioner regarding payment of bonus, attendance incentive, production incentive and relating to certain gift articles are not required to be settled in writ jurisdiction of this Court. As such, I am not inclined to interfere, thus, this petition for writ is disposed of by giving a liberty to the petitioner to claim all these issues as per his entitlement under the provisions of Section 33(c)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 or by availing any other appropriate remedy. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal '