IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 15TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 24TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29827 of 2011(C) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ ST.PETERS TRAINING COLLEGE, KOLENCHERRY.P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER BABU PAUL. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM SMT.NISHA GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE (NCTE), JNANA BHARATHI CAMPUS, NAGARABHAVI CIRCLE, OPP.NATIONAL LAW SCHOOL, BANGALORE-560 056. 2. LAL BAHADUR SASTHRI CENTRE FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR.PIN-695 001. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. R1 BY ADV.SRI.V.M.KURIAN,SC, NCTE R2 BY ADV. SRI.LEO GEORGE,SC,LBS CENTRE FOR SCIENC R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SHAH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.29827/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE ORDER NO.F.KL/SEC/N/327/SRO/NCTE/2004-2005/790 DATED 23/2/2005. P2 COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE NO.F.NO.APSO9680/B.ED/AP/2011-12/29466 DATED 12/7/2011. P3 COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 27/7/2011 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE. P4 COPY OF THE DECISION AS PUBLISHED IN THE WEBSITE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 29827 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T The writ petition was filed with the following prayers. “i) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to allot students for the B.Ed. Training programme from the Governed quota for the year 2011-2012 as there is not legal impediment in conducting the course during the academic year 2011-2012 in terms of Ext.P4. ii) Issue a writ declaring that the 2nd respondent is obliged in terms of the agreement to allot students in the petitioner college for the academic year 2011-2012 and that the decision as reflected in Ext.P4 is no legal impediment in making allotment for the academic year 2011-2012. iii) Pass such other order or direction as this court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.” W.P.(C) No. 29827 OF 2011 :2 : 2. When the matter came up for admission today, the Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent submits that the admissions to B.Ed. Course, for the academic year 2011-2012, is completed and that students have been allotted to the petitioner, College also. 3. In the light of said submissions the petitioner should have no further grievance. Therefore recording the submissions as above and clarifying that in the light of the directions in Ext.P4, petitioner will be free to conduct the course for the academic year 2011-12, this writ petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-