IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1282 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.946 OF 2006 Vatsala N. Vasaokar ..Plaintiff Vs. Bimabai C. Mhatre & Ors. ..Defendants Mr Sheetal Redekar i/b Mr. S.S.Redekar for the Plaintiff Mr. Rupesh Lanjekar i/b Mr. Atul Damle for the Defendants CORAM: A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATE : 6th MAY, 2010 P.C. Heard submissions at the bar. Although reply is not yet filed to this chamber summons, the nature of amendment which is proposed by the plaintiffs is to give particulars in respect of the description of the suit property. That being so, I am inclined to allow the chamber summons. The chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment proposed is to be effected within 8 weeks considering the ensuing summer vacation. Copy of the amended plaint be served upon the learned counsel for the defendants. S.O. to 29th June 2010 for reporting compliance. (A.P. BHANGALE, J.)