1 wp 4056.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4056 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Shri S. S. Thombre, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State Shri R. V. Gore, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 14th July, 2011. PER COURT : . The Writ Petition No. 4056/2011 is decided vide judgment and order dated 13.07.2011. 2. The motion is made for speaking to minutes. In para 14 of the said judgment it is stated that rule is accordingly made absolute in terms of prayer clause 'C'. However, prayer clause 'C' deals with an interim relief. The learned counsel states that the prayer clause is prayer clause "B". The learned counsel for the 2 wp 4056.11 respondent No. 4 is present, so also the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. The text of the judgment contains that the writ petition is allowed in toto i. e. prayer "B". In the light of above, the necessary corrections be made in the judgment. In para 14 of the judgment instead of prayer clause "C", the same shall be corrected as prayer clause "B". The necessary copy be issued after correction. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/July 11