: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.34 OF 2010 Jayant Krishna Nazare .. Petitioner V/s. Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. Prashand Bhavke i/b. Mr. N.V. Bandivadekar for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 25 TH JANUARY, 2010. P.C.: 1. The Contempt Petition is misconceived. By an order dated 16th June, 2009 passed in Writ Petition No.2132 of 2009, the Division Bench of this Court had directed the respondent-Municipal Corporation in that Petition to complete the enquiry against the petitioner by 30th September, 2009. The Division Bench has also directed that in the event the enquiry was not completed by that date, the respondent-Municipal Corporation would consider the petitioner for promotion, irrespective of the pendency of the enquiry. It appears that by an order dated 2nd December, 2009, one Sanjeev Bhaskar : 2 : Ballal has been promoted. The petitioner contends that this indicates that he was not considered for promotion. 2. There is no statement made in the said order indicating that the petitioner has not been considered for promotion. In the event, the petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that his junior has been promoted, he may adopt appropriate proceedings to redress his grievance. 3. The Contempt Petition is dismissed. .......