IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5956 of 2006 GIRISH PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 9.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This is second or third visit for similar kind of relief, earlier by the father of the petitioner and now by the son of the earlier petitioner. The son who happens to be the petitioner in the present writ application claims to consider the case of his father for grant of junior selection grade, senior selection grade and super selection grade. When the father of the petitioner came before this Court, the Court directed the respondents to consider his case. Despite earlier rejection of the claim of the father of the petitioner in the year 2004 the matter was reconsidered and a fresh order contained in annexure-3 dated 16th August, 2005 has been passed. It clearly indicates that looking at the position of the seniority of the father of the petitioner and the cadre strength; the father of the petitioner did not come within the ambit of consideration for grant of such benefit. The facts being what they are no relief can be granted to the petitioner. More so since the above fact has been reiterated in the counter affidavit and not controverted otherwise. This writ application is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)