AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.898 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1034 OF 2005 Mohd. Akram Mohd. Munawar Shaikh & Ors. .... Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra. .... Respondent None for the applicants. Ms. U.V. Kejriwal, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DATED : 13TH AUGUST, 2008. P.C.:- 1. This bail application is filed by original accused 1 to 3. Learned counsel for the applicants is not present. Our attention is drawn by Ms. Kejriwal, learned A.P.P. to order dated 23/1/2006 passed by the Division Bench of this court (B.H. Marlapalle & Smt. AJN 2 Roshan Dalvi, JJ). The said order is a reasoned order. By that order, application for bail preferred by applicant 1 is rejected and applicants 2 and 3 are granted bail. The fact that earlier bail application was filed in this court, has not been disclosed in the present application. In fact, in paragraph 9 of the present application, it is stated that the applicants have not preferred any other application before this court or before the Supreme Court. Inasmuch as the fact that one bail application was preferred in this court and application for bail of applicant 1 was rejected by this court is suppressed from this court, in our opinion, applicant 1 does not deserve to get any relief from this court. Besides after the first bail application was rejected, there is no change in the circumstances. Hence, application is rejected. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.]