IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3089 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3089 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3089 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.950 OF 2002 WRIT PETITION NO.950 OF 2002 WRIT PETITION NO.950 OF 2002 Reshma Balvant Kerkar .. Applicant V/s University of Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents Ms.Rao h/f Mr.Mihir Desai for the Applicant. Mr.B.V.Phadnis for the Respondents. CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : 22.12.2004. DATE : 22.12.2004. DATE : 22.12.2004. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Civil Application, the Applicant is seeking to recall the order dated 1.4.2004 whereby the Writ Petition was dismissed in default. Perused the Civil Application. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay and for recalling the order of dismissal of the Writ Petition. There is no case of inaction, negligence of want of bonafide on the part of the applicant. Hence the Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a-1) and (b). ....