BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Ninth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.10267 of 2011 1. R.THANULINGAM 2. SAROJINI : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs. 1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, UTHAMAPALAYAM, THENI DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, UTHAMAPALAYAM, THENI DISTRICT. (CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011) : RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS For Petitioner : M/S. S.MAHENDRAPATHY Advocate For Respondent : Mr. A.RAMAR Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 498-A of I.P.C and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the de-facto complainant, only petition enquiry is pending and no FIR has been registered. 3.Considering the rival submission made on either side, the respondent is directed not to harass the petitioners. The respondent https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ is directed to follow the dictum laid down in D.K.Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610 under the guise of enquiry. With above observation, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- 09/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, UTHAMAPALAYAM, THENI DISTRICT. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, UTHAMAPALAYAM, THENI DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. S.MAHENDRAPATHY Advocate SR.No.26859 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10267 of 2011 Date :09/08/2011 NSV/10.8.11/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/