IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48552 of 2008 SHEOCHANDRA KUMAR, S/o Ram Briksh Das Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 05.03.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has no concern with the seized vehicle along with ganja. He further submits that the Police failed to identify the owner of the vehicle that goes against the petitioner and there is clear assertion that the petitioner was driving the vehicle having no paper. In other words, there was no paper in the vehicle and recovered ganja was there. So creating doubt at petitioner’s hand, he is not liable for any liberty. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. There is no need to analyze ganja for considering the bail. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)