1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3735 OF 2009 Master Omkar Prakash Kinawdekar & Ors. .. Petitioners Versus Sudhakar Narayan Mayekar .. Respondent Mr.S.S.Deshmukh for petitioners CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 12th June 2009. P.C.: 1] Petitioners’ application for interim injunction (Exh.5) was rejected by the trial court and an application for review of the same is also rejected. Aggrieved by that the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution. 2] Having perused the orders under challenge I see no reason to interfere with them. More so, as the court below has prima facie and tentatively concluded that the suit property has not been properly described in the pleadings and the documents relied upon. Needless to clarify that all observations are made at the interlocutory stage and, therefore, the apprehension of the petitioners that they may affect the trial is not well founded. In any event, the trial court to decide the suit on its own merits and in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the observations at the interlocutory stage. Petition is dismissed with this clarification. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)