IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** RFA No.580 of 2000(O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 24.02.2009 **** Mahesh Kumar . . . . Appellant VS. State of Haryana and another . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: Mr.Ashwani Kumar Bura, Advocate for the appellant. Ms.Mamta Singal Talwar, AAG, Haryana for the respondents. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J.(ORAL) Both the parties are ad idem that in the present appeal there is an error in calculation of the amount of compensation which has been got corrected in Review Application No. 31 of 2007 in RFA No.1379 of 1994 titled as “Nand Lal and others vs. State of Haryana and another” decided by the Division Bench of this Court on 31.8.2007. In view of the undisputed position, the present appeal is allowed and it is ordered that the appellant shall be entitled to the compensation as awarded by the Division Bench of this Court in Review Application No. 31 of 2007 in RFA No.1379 of 1994 titled as “Nand Lal and others vs. State of Haryana and another”. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) FEBRUARY JUDGE vivek