IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21896 of 2009 JHAPASI NAT @ JHAPASI RAM @ MANOJ NAT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 27.08.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner has approached this court seeking bail in a case instituted under Sections 395 and 412 of the Penal Code. Allegation as per F.I.R. is that the informant was relieved of his mobile phone and certain cash amount on gun point while moving on a village road. It appears that in course of investigation, looted mobile phone was traced. The SIM was changed and the mobile phone was used with a new SIM which was registered in the name of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner draws attention of the court to the material collected at paragraph no.41 of the case diary wherefrom it appears that on verification it was found that the petitioner had already left the village and was residing at some other place. The SIM and the mobile phone were being used by his son-in-law called Chandan Nut. It appears that subsequently the police also roped Chandan Nut in the present case. Referring to paragraph no.12 of the bail application, it has been predicted that the petitioner does not carry any murky past. It appears that petitioner is in custody since 06.01.2009. 2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M. Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Bikramganj P.S.Case no. 178 of 2008, subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioner. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)