1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR C.R.A.NO.87 of 2009. Dr.Satishchand Labhchand Verma ..vs.. Smt.Darshan Kaur wd/o Dr.Ramnik Singh Madan and anr. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.Masood Shareef, Adv. for the appi”t. Mr.P.A.Markandewar Adv. for resp.no.1. Mr.S.G.Deshpande Adv. for resp.no.2. C ORAM : Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J. DATED : 8th February, 2010. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the interest of the revision applicant would be satisfied if the direction for clubbing the inter- pleader suit filed by respondent no.1 along with the eviction suit filed by the revision applicant is given, as in view of filing of the inter-pleader suit, the eviction suit filed by the revision applicant has been stayed. The learned counsel for respondent no.1 has no objection to the clubbing of the two suits. Respondent no.2 being a defendant to the inter- pleader suit can have no objection to the direction. Hence, it is directed that the Reg.Civil Suit No.328 of 2 2005 and Reg.Civil Suit No.100 of 2007 be clubbed together and heard by the same court. With this direction, the revision application is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE. chute