Civil Revision No.1452 of 2011(O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Civil Revision No.1452 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on : March 01, 2011 Raj Kumar and others ... Petitioners VERSUS Buta Ram and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Abhishek Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. A.N.JINDAL, J.- A decree for specific performance of the agreement dated 4.10.1994 passed in favour of the respondents, is being executed. The petitioners have preferred objection petition claiming that their predecessor, namely Sohan Lal along with his brother had purchased the property through a sale-deed dated 13.8.1958. Therefore, they are the bonafide purchasers for value, without notice. The decree was passed way back in 1998 on the basis of the agreement dated 4.10.1994. Such objections were never raised by Sohan Lal or after his death by the petitioners. Now, when the case has reached at the stage of delivery of possession, these superfluous objections have been filed. No such sale-deed, as alleged, has been placed on record. Civil Revision No.1452 of 2011(O&M) [ 2 ] No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. March 01, 2011 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE