THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.A.No.2149 of 2003 JUDGMENT (Per Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) The second respondent was removed from service after due process of enquiry vide order dated 24.03.1992, on the ground that he committed certain cash and ticket irregularities while working as Conductor at Sangareddy Depot. Assailing the said order, he filed I.D.No.504 of 1992 before the Labour Court-II, Hyderabad, which in turn set aside the order of removal and directed the appellant-APSRTC to reinstate the second respondent into service without break in service, but without backwages vide award dated 29.03.1993. Aggrieved by the denial of backwages, the second respondent filed W.P.No.33666 of 1998, wherein the learned single Judge of this Court passed order on 08.04.2003, allowing the writ petition declaring that the second respondent is entitled to all benefits including backwages on his reinstatement as directed by the Labour Court in the award passed in I.D.No.504 of 1992. Challenging the same, the appellant-APSRTC filed the present appeal. 2. A perusal of the award passed by the Labour Court as well as the impugned order shows that the order of removal of the second respondent from service is held invalid on the ground that the appellant Corporation has not followed the mandatory provisions under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. When once the order of removal is declared as nullified as per the said provisions, the second respondent shall be entitled to all the benefits including backwages on reinstatement, as rightly held by the learned single Judge of this Court in the order impugned, as such, there is no need to interfere with the same by this Court. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J Date:28.09.2011 sj