IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 1029 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION : 23.01.2008 M/s V.K. Milk Chilling Centre, Amritsar .... PETITIONER Versus The Punjab Financial Corporation and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr. Vikram Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. ( Oral ) This is second petition filed by the petitioner for issuing direction to the respondent bank to revive the One Time Settlement arrived at between the parties, which was approved and accepted by the respondent Corporation. Earlier, for the similar relief, the petitioner had filed Civil Writ Petition No. 15024 of 2007, which was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court on October 15, 2007, by passing the following order : “Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to approach the respondents on the basis of the judgment of this Court dated CWP No. 1029 of 2008 -2- 22.12.2006 rendered in CWP No. 18557 of 2003 (P-7). Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.” In pursuance of the said order, the matter was again considered by the respondent Corporation and claim of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 18.12.2007, while making the observation that case of the petitioner is not similar to the case of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court. After hearing counsel for the petitioner, we are of the opinion that making a policy with regard to One Time Settlement is a policy decision. The petitioner cannot claim such policy as a matter of right. It is only a concession. Therefore, no such direction can be issued to the respondent Corporation to take a particular policy decision. Dismissed. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE January 23, 2008 ( RAKESH KUMAR GARG ) ndj JUDGE