IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 885 of 2005. Surendra Kumar Verma, S/O Shri Subheram, R/O Village Sherpur Khel Maun, Pargana Manglaur, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. … Petitioner. Vs. 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary, Basic Education, Dehradun. 2. Additional Director, S.C.E.R.T., Uttaranchal, Narendra Nagar, Tehri Garhwal. 3. Principal, District Institute of Education & Training Bageshwar, District Bageshwar at DIET Almora. …Respondents. Mr. Lalit Tiwari, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. M.S.Tyagi, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.P.Upadhyay, learned Additional C.S.C. for respondents. Date March 15, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to give admission to the petitioner in Special B.T.C. treating the petitioner in Science Group. According to the petitioner, the petitioner possesses the decree of B.Sc. (Agriculture) from Meerut University in the year 1988 with Elements of Genetics, Production of Field Crops, Production of Fruit Crops and Fruits, Dairy Cattle Production, Plant Breeding and Crop Systematics, Market Mil and Milk Product, Economics of Agriculture Production and Extension Education and Community Development subjects. In Writ Petition No. 886 of 2005 (MS), Virendra Kumar Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others, similar controversy was involved and this Court vide order dated 29th July 2009 has held that the agriculture faculty and science faculty are different altogether and the 2 petitioner is not entitled to get admission to Special B.T.C. in science faculty on the basis of B.Sc. (Ag.) degree. Learned counsel for the parties have urged that this writ petition may be dismissed on merits in terms of the order dated 29-7- 2009 passed in Writ Petition No. 886 of 2005 (MS), Virendra Kumar Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others. I have perused the order dated 29-7-2009. The controversy involved in the present writ petition is identical to that of the controversy resolved in W.P.M.S. No. 886 of 2005. The writ petition is dismissed on merits in terms of the order dated 29-7-2009 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 886 of 2005 (MS), Virendra Kumar Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others. All pending applications stand disposed of. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP 3