1 S.B.Civil Revision Petition No.303/2006 Yaseen. vs. Fateh Chand. Date : 5.4.2007 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Chaitanya Gahlot, for the petitioner. Mr.Om Mehta, for the respondent. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not in possession of the property in dispute and the decree was passed against him only. The decree holder is executing the decree and the petitioner submitted objection petition under Section 47 CPC which was dismissed by the executing court. Looking to the stand taken by the petitioner himself that he is not in possession of the property in dispute and he has no title to the property, then certainly, he has no reason to object execution of the decree. So far as claim of any other objector is 2 concerned, for that the petitioner cannot raise any grievance. It is settled that any person who is bound by the decree or claiming through judgment debtor is bound by the decree and in that situation, the present revision petition has been filed for no reason. In view of the above, this revision petition, having no merit, is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya