IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 23rd day of March, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 350 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Aftab .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 610/2009, U/s 420, 323, 504 IPC, PS Kotwali Manglore, District Haridwar. _______________________________________________________________ March 23, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant submitted that as per the averments made in the FIR, the dispute is civil in nature. He further submitted that the beneficiary of the transaction is question is co-accused Jamshed Ali, who has been granted interim relief by this Court and his arrest has been stayed in connection with this case vide order dated 14.1.2010 passed in Criminal Writ Petition No. 29 of 2010. He further argued that the applicant is not at all the beneficiary of the said transaction. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Aftab be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 23.3.2010 PRABODH