mst FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2579 OF 2010 Dr.Arjun Dinkar Ghatte Petitioner versus Dinkar Tukaram Ghatte and others Respondents Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Gajanan M. Savagave for petitioner. Amit Borkar for respondents 1 to 6. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 15th April 2010 PC :- 1. By the impugned order the application made by the petitioner-plaintiff for recasting the issues has been decided. The order impugned is purely of interlocutory nature and no interference is called for with the impugned order at this stage. The remedy of the petitioner to challenge the impugned order in an appeal against the decree passed in the suit if it be adverse to him always remains open. Subject to what is observed above, the writ petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J.)