1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION ST. NO. 7066 OF 2010 (Ramdas Abhiman Solanke vs. The Returning Officer/ Tahsildar, Dayapur & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. APRIL 15, 2010. Heard Shri Shinde, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Mujumdar, learned AGP for respondents No. 1 to 3. Shri Shinde, learned counsel points out that the validity was not filed along with nomination paper and the same was tendered on 10.04.2010. It was verified from alleged original on 12.04.2010. He has invited attention to other xerox copy issued on 12.04.2010 by Caste Scrutiny Committee to point out that signature of S.W. Sawarkar on both the documents is different. According to him, validity certificate produced by Respondent No. 4 is fabricated document. The learned AGP contends that the question raises certain disputed issues of facts and hence cannot be examined in writ petition. It is apparent that merely by looking at two documents, this Court or in that case even Respondent No. 1 – Returning Officer, could not have labeled 2 particular certificate to be fabricated. The issue is, therefore, left open for adjudication at appropriate stage before Competent forum. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.