IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32924 of 2008 RAJ KUMAR BHARTI, S/O BRAHAMDEO BHARTI, R/O VILLAGE- BAGDOV, P.S-NAYAGAWN, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 14/01/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel representing the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case which has been registered under section 498 A and some other sections of the Indian Penal Code and sections ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. At the very outset the petitioner has expressed his willingness to keep the complainant as his wife with all the undertakings and conditions which can be imposed for the satisfaction of the complainant. The complainant has objected the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail and stated that cases have been filed on behalf of the petitioner against the complainant and her other family members so there was no question of going of the complainant with the petitioner. Relations of the petitioner and the complainant are presently on bitter note and the complainant is not ready to go with the petitioner. It will be futile to compel the petitioner to go jail. Considering the above facts, the petitioner above named is directed to surrender before the court below within 20 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and on his so - 2 - surrendering he shall be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Complaint Case No. 648 C of 2007, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)