IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3043 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: March 29, 2011. Rajesh Yadav. ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, Mahendergarh and others. ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Hooda, Advocate for the respondents. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside impugned order dated 13.04.2010 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Narnaul, Annexure P4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record including the impugned order passed by learned Additional District Judge, Narnaul. CR No.3043 of 2010 Facts relevant for the decision of the present revision petition are that, petitioner is running a hotel in the name and style of Yadav Hotel and Guest House at Mahendergarh and paying electricity bills regularly. However, premises was inspected by the officials of respondent and a demand of `14,71,875/- was raised by way of penalty and electricity connection of petitioner was also disconnected without giving him any notice. The present suit was filed by petitioner-plaintiff challenging the said order of assessment alongwith an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure for ad interim injunction order. The application was allowed by learned trial Court and the respondents were directed to restore electricity connection at its original number pending decision of the suit. Respondents filed appeal before learned Additional District Judge, Narnaul. Learned Additional District Judge vide impugned order dated 13.04.2010 directed the present petitioner to deposit 50% of the disputed amount and in case he failed to deposit the same, the injunction application was ordered to be deemed to have been dismissed. Aggrieved against the said order the present civil revision petition has been filed and a coordinate Bench of this Court passed the following order on 16.12.2011:- “On request of the learned counsel for the respondent, adjourned to 29.3.2011. In the meantime, if the petitioner deposits an amount of Rs.3 lacs to show his bona fides within a period of three weeks from today, the electricity connection shall be restored to him forthwith on such a deposit being made.” 2 CR No.3043 of 2010 It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to said order, petitioner deposited `3,00,000/- and the electricity connection was restored. It has also been stated by learned counsel for the respondents that as per order of this Court, `3,00,000/- has already been deposited by the petitioner and electricity connection has been restored. Hence, in view of these facts, interim order passed by this Court dated 16.12.2010 is, hereby, made absolute during the pendency of the suit. However, it is made clear that that nothing observed herein shall be having any bearing on the decision of this case on merit by learned trial Court. The present revision petition is disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) March 29, 2011. JUDGE 'om' 3