THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4701 OF 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order, dated 13.09.2010, in I.A.No.264 of 2010 in O.S.No.254 of 2008, on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur, whereunder and whereby, the petition, filed under Order XVI Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to summon the thumb impression register from the Sub-Registrar’s Office, Anantapur, with regard to the registered sale deed, dated 07.02.1980, said to have been executed by the vendor of late mother of minor plaintiff in favour of P. Narasimha Charulu under document bearing No.874 of 1980 and send the same to the expert along with the original registered sale deed, dated 13.03.2006, which contain the admitted signatures of the vendor of late mother of minor plaintiff, for comparison of the signature, was dismissed on the ground that the document which is available in Sub-Registrar’s Office is voluminous one and the same is required for day to day transactions to obtain the thumb impressions of vendors and vendees and that the petitioner has not availed the remedial methods available such as obtaining the true photostat certified copies of the sale deed from the Registrar Office concerned with regard to the sale deed, dated 07.02.1980. 2. Petitioner herein is the minor represented by his father. The petition schedule property belongs to one T. Seetha Rami Reddy and G. Rami Reddy and they have sold the same to the vendor of late mother of minor petitioner under a registered sale deed, dated 05.08.1977, and from him the late mother of minor petitioner has purchased the said site under a registered sale deed, dated 13.03.2006. Mother of minor petitioner died on 25.04.2007, and after her death, the respondents have constructed buildings illegally in the petition schedule property. Respondents have taken a specific plea that the vendor of late mother of minor petitioner has sold the plaint schedule property in favour of one P. Narasimha Charulu under a registered sale deed, dated 07.02.1980. Hence, the present petition. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that no admitted signatures of the vendor of late mother of minor petitioner were available; that the thumb impression of the vendor of late mother of minor petitioner is available only in the Sub-Registrar Office; that therefore, the Register, which contains the thumb impressions of the vendors and vendees, has to be summoned and hence, he prays to set aside the impugned order. 4. It is for the petitioner to ascertain the admitted thumb impression of vendor of his late mother available with other authorities. The petitioner ought to have obtained the original sale deed, which contains the thumb impression of vendor of his late mother. No explanation is forthcoming as to why he has not obtained the link documents when he purchased the property. Therefore, the trial Court rightly dismissed the same. The impugned order does not suffer from any infirmities so as to call for interference by this Court. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C. BHANU, J November 19, 2010 MD IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4701 OF 2010 Between: Erukala Lakshmi Narasimha Reddy .....PETITIONER AND Tallam Srivani and others ....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4701 OF 2010 November 19, 2010