IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19323 of 2008 1. KARU YADAV S/O LATE LAKHAN YADAV 2. DWARIKA YADAV S/O JAGO YADAV 3. KARA YADAV @ KAROO S/O JAGO YADAV 4. INDRADEO YADAV S/O JAGDISH YADAV ALL R/O VILLAGE SHAMBEY, P.S. WARISALIGANJ, DISTRICT- NAWADAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.04.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 13.3.2007 passed by Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Nawadah in Complaint Case No. 64/2000 by which he has taken cognizance under Section 302 I.P.C. It has been submitted that initially a First Information Report numbered as Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 2 of 2004 was instituted which ended in a final report which was accepted by the court below. In the mean while, one protest petition was filed by the informant but no order was passed on the same. Thereafter, another protest was filed which was numbered as complaint protest P.C. 64 of 2006 in which the complainant was examined along with 5 witnesses and cognizance was taken. The grievance of the petitioner is that the complainant has filed many protest petition with 2 different facts and, therefore, the petitioners find themselves in difficulty of defending themselves. In my view, the grievance of the petitioner is completely unfounded since admittedly cognizance has been taken on the protest petition P.C. 64/2006 and it is the facts stated in that protest which will be the material against the petitioners. In view of such, finding no merit in the application, the same is dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)