IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.28380 of 2009 Between: Kambampati Subburam. … Petitioner And The State Bank of Hyderabad, represented by its authorized officer. … Respondent This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.28380 of 2009 ORDER: - (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.GOPAL REDDY) This writ petition is filed questioning the notice issued under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for brevity, “the Act”) apprehending that without following the procedure and issuing the notice under Section 13(4) of the Act, the respondent-bank may take possession of the property. It is specifically alleged that no notice as such under Section 13(4) Rule 8 of the Act has been published so far. In view of the same, petitioner is at liberty to file his response/objections to the notice issued under Section 13(2) of the Act, within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On filing such objections, respondent-bank can consider the same and pass appropriate orders and can proceed with under Section 13(4) of the Act. Until the petitioner’s objections are considered and disposed of, respondent-bank shall not take any coercive steps. In the event, the respondent-bank rejected the objections, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same by way of appeal before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. __________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J ________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J 29th December 2009 Note: C.C. by wire B/o. Lmv