IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2011 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 33481 of 2011(I) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- VIDHYA S., D/O.M.R.SASENDRAN NAIR, AGED 20 YEARS, VII SEMESTER, ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING, ADI SHANKARA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, KALADY. (RESIDING AT MADHAVAM, AYYAPPANKAVU, KANNACHANTHODU CROSS ROAD, PACHALAM, ERNAKULAM) BY ADVS. SRI.M.R.SUDHEENDRAN SRI.K.RAJAGOPAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686 560, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686 560. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, ADI SHANKARA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, KALADY - 683 574. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC., MG. UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 33481/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE HALL TICKET FOR THE SIXTH SEMESTER TB TECH DEGREE EXAMINATION MAY 2011 OF THE PETITIONER. P2: COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 04/10/2011 ALONG WITH A COPY OF THE PAY IN SLIP FOR REMITTING THE FEES FOR RE-VALUATION, SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 33481 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner, submits that she appeared for B.Tech 6th semester examination and failed in one paper submitted as per Ext.P2 application for revaluation and filed this writ petition seeking an order for expeditious revaluation and declaration of his results. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Kp/-