1 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2251 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 88 OF 2000 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri Rajendra Satam h/f Shri P.R. Kadam for the applicants. Shri R.M. Patne, AGP for Respondent No.1. Ms Minakshi Surve i/by Shri R.A. Thorat for Respondent No.2. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 6TH SEPTEMBER, 2010 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicants and the learned AGP for Respondent No.1 as also the learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2. The writ petition has been dismissed for non-prosecution on account of non removal of the office objections. In view the averments made in the application, a case for restoration is made out. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). 2 2. The applicants will file a complete compilation of the writ petition typed on ledger paper. Compilation to be filed within a period of eight weeks from today to enable the Registry to reconstruct the file of the writ petition. If compliance is not made within the stipulated time, the order of dismissal will stand. (A.S.OKA, J)