1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 6476 OF 2007 *** 1. None for the Petitioner. We have heard Mr. S. K. Kadam who appears for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 as well. 2. Rule, made returnable forthwith, heard finally, by consent of the parties. 3. In group of identical writ petitions, affidavit in reply is filed by Respondent No. 2 Maharashtra Public Service Commission. It was filed in Writ Petition No.6175 of 2007 encompassing grievance of all such petitioners. Learned A.G.P. submits that name of the Petitioner is recommended. In view of the affidavit in reply filed in Writ Petition No.6175 of 2007, nothing further remains to be adjudicated upon in this writ petition. 4. Writ petition is partly allowed. Respondent No.2 shall take further necessary steps expeditiously in view of the affidavit in reply. 5. Rule is made absolute in above terms. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. No order as to costs. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. No costs. 6. In view of final disposal of writ petition itself, nothing further remains in civil application No.7508 of 2009. Accordingly, civil application stands disposed of. [SHRIHARI P.DAVARE,J.] [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.] Dated:13/10/2010. ans/6476