COCP No.1075 of 2009 -: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1075 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: October 20, 2009. Anil Kumar & Anr. ...Petitioner(s) v. Yograj & Anr. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri Aman Bansal, Advocate with Petitioner. Shri Manish Singla, Advocate, for the respondents. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): The respondents are present in Court. As per the averments made in this petition, despite the undertaking given in Civil Revision No.1962 of 2008, the respondents have failed to vacate the demised premises. It is the further allegation of the petitioners that the respondents have also not paid the arrears of rent and other dues etc. In response to the show cause notice issued by this Court, reply by way of short affidavit of respondent No.1 has been filed in court, which is taken on record. In the aforesaid affidavit, it has been submitted that the respondents have already vacated the premises in question. This fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners. However, his grouse is that the respondents have not paid the arrears of rent and other charges. Respondent No.1 has paid the arrears of rent and electricity COCP No.1075 of 2009 -: 2 :- charges today to the petitioner, who is present in Court. Shri Manish Singla, on instructions from Yog Raj – respondent No.1, states that water bill etc., if any, raised by the Municipal Council shall be paid/settled by the respondents within two weeks from today. This satisfies the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid, I am not inclined to proceed further in this petition. Rule discharged. It is also made clear that the security documents submitted by respondent No.2 in the court of CJM, Sangrur for securing his bail in pursuance of the order dated 18.9.2009 shall be returned to him. Disposed of. October 20, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge