IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2009 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 6664 of 2009(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.H. MOHAMMED, PHC ROAD, KUMBALA P.O., KASARGOD. BY ADV. SRI.M.A.FAYAZ RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, (LAND ACQUSITION), NH KANNUR. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, N.H . DIVISION, NEAR COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KANNUR-1. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.6664 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 4th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a claimant in a Land Acquisition Reference. The Reference Court has awarded enhanced compensation. The petitioner filed an execution petition, which is pending. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs: “i) To issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to release the sanctioned award amount vide Exhibit- P3 order being 50% of the amount due to the petitioner vide judgment in L.A.R. 97 of 1995 of Sub Court, Kasaragode dated 31.3.2008 forthwith; ii) To direct the 1st respondent to deposit the award amount as per the award of the Sub Court, Kasaragode in L.A.R.97 of 1995 and as per the claim made in E.P. No.50 of 2008 pending before the Sub Court, Kasaragode forthwith; iii) To direct the court below to finally dispose of E.P. No.50 of 2008.” 2. Admittedly the E.P. was filed only in July 2008. There would be scores of other old execution petitions pending before same Court. The petitioner has not made out a case for disposal of his execution petition giving priority over other old execution petitions. I do not think that this Court should entertain the prayer of the petitioner. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2