IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL MCC Review Application No. 673 of 2010 In WRIT PETITION (S/B) No. 89 of 2006 Dr. Surendra Singh ………Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …..Respondents. Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Pradeep Hairiya, Advocate for the applicant/respondent no.4. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent no. 1. Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Barin Ghosh, C.J, (Oral) In the garb of this review application, the applicant who was respondent no. 4 in the writ petition seeks to re- argue the matter once again. That being not permissible, the review application is dismissed. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 7.10.2010 Rathour