THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29131 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondent No.2 in not properly conducting investigation into averments of the complaint given by the petitioner, without proper appreciation of the same and intentionally dropping the proper Section of Law in Cr.No.115 of 2009, dt.7.8.2009 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, without proper appreciation of facts, and consequently direct the 1st respondent to entrust the matter to another investigating officer for proper conduction of investigation afresh in the above said crime and to file further report.” It is the grievance of the petitioner that though the offence committed by the accused in Crime No.115 of 2009 attracts the provisions of Sections 448, 307, 324, 506 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, without proper investigation, a final report was filed charging the case only for the offence punishable under Section 324 IPC. In the counter-affidavit filed by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Manthani Police Station, it is stated that after filing final report, the same was taken on file and numbered as C.C.No.348 of 2009 by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Manthani and at that stage, in view of the representation made by the petitioner, after receiving opinion from the Assistant Public Prosecutor on 24.01.2010, a requisition was filed before the learned Magistrate seeking permission for examining some more witnesses and to file supplementary charge sheet in the above-mentioned C.C. It is also stated that pursuant thereto, some more witnesses were examined and after completion of further investigation, supplementary charge sheet was filed by adding Sections 448, 307, 506, 324 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. In view of filing supplementary charge sheet by adding Sections 448, 307, 506, 324 IPC read with Section 34 IPC based on the representation submitted by the petitioner, the allegation of the petitioner that there was no proper investigation by the respondents cannot be accepted as his grievance is redressed. In that view of the matter, no further directions need be issued as prayed for by the petitioner in this writ petition, which is accordingly, closed. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 6th JULY, 2010. kvni