1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4194 OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 27 OF 2002 Anatrao S/o Rangnath Gadhave .. Applicant Versus 1. Pandurang S/o Shivram Dhekane and another .. Respondents Shri S. S. Choudhari, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri V. D. Salunke, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 09TH SEPTEMBER, 2010. PER COURT : . This is an application for intervention on behalf of the brother of the non applicant No. 2 Govardhan. It is the case of the present applicant that the deceased Govardhan had executed relinquishment deed in favour of the present applicant, as such, seeks intervention. 2 2. There is no provision under the Code of Civil Procedure of filing of an intervention in any suit or appeal. If the applicant claims any right pursuant to an instrument, then in such circumstances, the applicant has to apply for substitution under the provisions of Order XXII Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code. Moreover, the document which has been relied upon is relinquishment deed and same is unregistered and relinquishment deed of a property involving valuation more than Rs. 100/- is compulsorily required to be registered within the meaning of Section 17 of the Registration Act. In the light of the same, the present application cannot be considered. The applicant is at liberty to take appropriate steps. The civil application is accordingly disposed of. [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/Sept. 10