IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21521 of 2010 DIMPAL @ RAVI RANJAN PRASAD, S/o Sri Gopal Krishna Prasad. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. ----------- 03. 26.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that four months after the alleged occurrence it was alleged that the petitioner had kidnapped the married daughter of the informant. During investigation it transpired that in fact the petitioner had married the daughter of the informant which the informant did not like and thereafter she was married to another person and this occurrence took place in this background. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named who is in custody since 21.12.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Ishipur Barahat P.S. Case No. 58 of 2009 subject to the 2 following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be local since the petitioner belongs to Jharkhand and the other bailor shall be father of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)