1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3207 of 2009 (Ravindra Vs. State) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. R.R.Mantri, Adv., for the applicant. Mrs. B.R.Khekale, APP for the respondent State. Mr. P.S.Patil, Counsel, to assist A.P.P. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 9/10/2009 P.C.:- 1. The accused/applicant Ravindra is said to be an Advocate, seeks pre-arrest bail in Crime No.177/2009, under Section 307 of IPC. According to the learned Counsel, there was partition, the dispute revolves only about one room. The father of the complainant indeed had himself kept or removed the material from the disputed room and since the complainant did not approve the attempt of his father 2 to facilitate act of compromise in favour of accused Ravindra, entire scenario has taken place. At this stage, without attributing anything, considering the nature of accusations and the fact that family controversy has given rise to the prosecution, following order: (a) In the event of arrest of accused/applicant Ravindra s/o Ramchandra Kucheriya, he be released on his furnishing P.R. bond and surety in the sum of Rs. 10,000/-. (b) The accused applicant shall keep himself away from Dhule City upto 16th Oct.,2009, and thereafter, from 23rd Oct.,2009, till 6th Nov.,2009. (c) The accused/applicant will not influence or terrorise the complainant Yogesh or other witnesses. 3 Application disposed of in above terms. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/ 3207-09crapl