t>^- c^- IN THE HON'BLEHIGH COURT OF CUHATTISGARH ATBII.ASPURK:.G.l W. P.Xeh 227 NO.M2-(>& /2009 PETITIONERS ^^•_Aff^'^n^ RESPONDENTS .<•-" / l467/ ^y"y ip '/ff^ ,•••' %®>/ \a>..-'1 ... ^^ G-. • \»* 1<¥'"'^" ^ f. r- Jl'C ^l v( rW- rt'..^ iS Basant Kurnar Son of Late Toman Lal Tamrakar, aged about 78 years, R/o. Tamerpara, Near Killa Mandire, Durg, District Durg (C.G.), Sud&ma Prasad, Son of .Late Toman Lal Tamrakar, aged about 72 years, Balkisan, Son of Late Toman Lal Tamrakar, agedabout 60 years, Mo.2 & 3 R/o. Village Sankari, Tah. Gunderdehj, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS ^l. Board of ^ ^ Revenue, -Aatc: of jChhattisgarh ah 6i|asF>^^-c-c*-J> '^TTtwA "CdU^-J- . ft«LL|W^.'" /2. Additional CoUector, Durg, Djstrict Durg (C.G.) /-3. Sub DivisionaJ Officer (Revenue), Patan, Distriet Durg (C.G.) ,4. Tahsildar, Gunderdehi, Dlstrict Durg CC.G.) /5. Khedu Ram Tamrakar, Son of late Toman Lal Tamrakar, R/o. Village Sankari, Tahsil - Gunderdehi, DistSrict Durg (C.G.), ,,6. Chunni Lal Son of Sudama Tamrakar, R/o. Village Gunderdehi, District Durg (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OR MANDAMUS/ CERTIORARI. ORDER/ ORDERS. DIRECTION/ DIRECTIONS £TC. TTT iioisjAai paoaas 13 'japio vav^ isnre^y sSttipiig aip SUIIIU^B uiiq ^Cq pas paoRippv M(t aiq:aq uoisiAai B psig 8trunsB3ux POB[ jo Apio aoptR-ted jojj jays jBpiisqaj, aqj, -^ins ^TAIO paig a&f -lad SB 'assdq.aq ui 'aottsanb in paeil ot pamibai OS{B ST SUIBS aq^ 'aiojaxsl^ ^UTOf B SI pUB plttg £[paasfnpiitH vs^ aisc^ osfB si piiB[ aioui 3UIOS VBjy. p^B^ •o-o aq^ jo 82,1 aonoss Japali TIB paAom s "ON ^apuodsai aqj, •s •< jo aiHBa sip m papiooai ^IIIOf VSVi 'gg -ON B3[[BH UBd4Bd 'VBpI^f ^.8'S SauTtSBSTa pOBi pio-j. ^ip arel SlBM •passpitStp jtq pa(g TioisiAai paooss aq^ 'japanai^ -V/6S 'OM asBQ aoTsiAay KI 600e-9-| ^q psssBd japjo aip ISTIIBSB paioaii^ 's^KtS stR -loj '^B.laitao a»BOOApv 'A(J •siauoTlliad STR joj ':'atBao+pv TVAWfOV • 1)^IK> hU]K> l^ >1^>>1&|> ^Sj ^t J|tAkUt ^^UJbKfa •JBpiisqsj, atp Iq papjooaj i(iTKlsip SBA qoiqA 'JC40S([[00 luauopttsd aqj, •saiB»oaqt'8'S paiap.io 's3T»jed ary. SuuBaq sq sapjsd at^ 'siaaopR.ad aqi |aq}. itRM 8aoie p3aoi^T)JBd aq pTie ^iadoLid Aij.uiig npaiH i{X mog pasBqoiind SBA qoiqA papvavaoo pws apoy anasAsy Hoi)pjBd Sti jcg: uop.Boiidd.® >(ij ^ttapaodsax pae sjanoppad Sjm.a •WSTQ 'iqspiapiino [g a8e{[tA ya pafBVfi®ajBi.oaq 3SRO 3Tp JO S).OBJ J3Ug •l? i^aaq ssq uiaiaq sjaaoTtptad aip. ^qa PTTB AqaiaqM sO-t'OOZ; 'ZS 'p3V3p snaaAay jo pieog avff. si tiopTiad ^itKi.sTii sqj, •g •UOTSSTnipB HO pIBSH 'BqBAffiqqoB^I 'S'VuqS 'Btqso^ ntiqsiA uqg •s eooe-s-eT H'N aoiASIU* IHHS •NOH saS i»^i»uajft tteii»a (tAbtjbl, ) Ibkh ^ OOZ ^^ ttalhtB IIAhlh ^}^'^-7-<^:w^... 'Slrftlfte 'bl<>lh.lh- te£. l=°.p tfclktfe |fh>Uc1 Uall ibll-b] Itb ttyK. 8Z.—3H-: ^J y-'-i V;;. %,^L&. •<;. ,J?yH6-78 SV^V W ^-tt4> 'gqi 3V^V wv *11*1CTI (h*ll<!h '3^';iiraRTtr, ®tilwiG,(sKii'yy ^.^>.C^1>^^ ^._........;....................................^^ 200 am^I 1cra?T (iql^t^) gWIW ^lfTO 311^1 was preferred before the disinissed. Heace this petitic|n 5. Shri Vishnu Koshta, would submit that aU fhe Cc not partitioning the propertji name ofthe pardes, but in family and should be Land Revenue Code. parti^ioned 6. Haviag heard leamed perused the record, I am o peadiag clauning partition ol petitioners can avail the int has no inerit 7. Learned counsel for t illegalily or jurisdictional leadiag to mauifest injustic extraordinary jurisdiction ol Constitution of India. 8. The petition fails and i <b!^fd41*1 WV^i ^ fssil <nii^.x ^sjfinsn^sr Board of Revenue wtu.ch was also learaed counsel for fhe petitioaers urts below have conunittBd iUegaBty in which is though uot recorded in joiut fact, is a proper<y of Hindu uadivided under Section 178 of the C.G. counsel for fhe parties aud havlng f the opiaion that as the civil suit is 'the properiy ia question., in which fhc ^rim relief also therefore, this petttion (ie petitioners failed to point out any e^ror ia passing the unpugaed order |e to the petitioners so as to iavoke this Court imder Ardcle 227 of the i dismissed at admission stage. Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge