mOH COURT OF CHHATTISOARH AT BILASPUR WRFT PETmON No. 2809 of2003 PETmONER DEFENDANTS 1 TO 12 1. A. Mazid Mutawalli, Gariya Band Distt. Raipur(C.G.) 2. Mo. Farukh, Up Mutwalli, Gariya Band, Distt.Raipur(C.G.) 3. Shri Abdul Salam Khan, Seeretary, Gariya Band Masjid, Muslim Samaj WardNo. 7, Gariya Band, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 4. Shri Abdul Sattar Meman, Dhanwala, Kosfaadhyaksha, Gariya Band Masjid, Muslim Jamat Ward No. 7,0ariya Band, Distt.Raipur(C.G.) 5. Shri Ala Rakha Meman S/o Late Shri Hazi Sumar Seth, Kishan Loha Bada, GariyaBand, Distt. Raipur(C.G:) 6. Shri Bachchu Bhai S/Q Late Haziwali Mohanimad Andawale, Resident of Gariya Bmd, Distt. Raipjr (C.G.) 7. Shri Sharif Khan S/o Late Shri Ashraf Khan, Ward No. 7, Cjariya Band, Distt. Raipur(C.G.) 8. Shn Bhalu Seth S/o Late Shri Abbad Seth, Kirana Dukanwale, Gariya Band, Distt.Rflipur(C.G,) 9. Shri AshrafMeman S/o Late Shri Abdul Sattar, Jutawale, resident of Gariya Band, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) l.Shri Rain Khan Jutawale, resident of Gariya Band, Distt. Raipur (G.G.) 11. Shri Salim Mistri S/o Late Shri Kazal Mistri, resident of Gariya Band, Distt. Raipur(C.G.) - 12.8hri Hanif Khan S/b Shri Pyar Khan, resident of Oariya Band, Distt; Raipur (C.G.) IS.Shri Firoz Khan S/o Shri Mahmood Khan, resident of Gariya Baad, Distt. Raipur(C.G.) All residerits of Gariya Band, Distt. Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS 1. SmL Kamarunnisha W/o Shri Abdul Kuddas Qureshi, Ward No. 7, Gariya Band, Tahsil Gariya Band, Distt. Raipur (C.G.XPlaintiff) DEFENDANTNo.13 2.8tate of ChhattisgaA Through: Collectar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur)(C.G.) (DefendaiitNo.13) RESPONDENTS PLAINTIFF J'^t^< WRTI PETH10N UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OFJNmA SB: Hon'ble ShriSatishK. Asnfliotri. J. Preseirt; Shri Anuya Kant Thwari, Advocate for the petitibners. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyerforthe State. OSALORDEa (Passedon28la dayof January, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, on insteuctions, seeks pemiission oftiiis Court to withdraw tiiis petition on fhe g-ound that wifhlhe passage oftime, this petitionhas become infi'uctuous. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 2. Itisordered. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Consequently, MCW)P No. 2566/2003, also stands dismissed. satishK.Agn,},,,^ Judge Atirit '^'