IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4410 of 2009 SHIVANAND SINGH, S/O SHRI SHIVJANAM SINGH, R/O VILLAGE DEVLAKHA BHITHI, P.O. BHITHI, SAHABUDDIN, P.S. BANIYAPUR, DISTRICT SARAN AT CHAPRA. …………. PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH EDUCATION SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SARAN AT CHAPRA. 3. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SARAN AT CHAPRA. 4. BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, BANIYAPUR (SARAN). 5. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BANIYAPUR (SARAN). 6. RAMJI OJHA, S/O MANDAV OJHA MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT RAMDHANAW, P.S. BANIYAPUR, DISTRICT – SARAN. 7. TASLIM AHMAD, S/O NOT NAME, PANCHAYAT SECRETARY –CUM- KARAMCHARI AT RAMDHANAW, P.S. BANIYAPUR, DISTRICT – SARAN. 8. NAGENDRA KUMAR SINGH, S/O KISHUN SINGH, R/O VILLAGE DEVLAKHA BITHI, P.O. BHITHI SAHABUDDIN, P.S. BANIYAPUR, DISTRICT – SARAN AT CHAPRA. …………. RESPONDENTS. ----------- For the petitioner : - Mr. Lakshman Lal Pandey, Advocate For the State : - Mr. Atal Bihari Pandey, AC to AAG12. 02/ 18.07.2011 Petitioner is aggrieved on account of selection made by the members of the Selection Committee. Petitioner’s case is that respondent-authorities have selected the candidates going against the rule, equity, norms, his higher marks has not been considered for selection. Considering the fact that rule provides for statutory appeal in the matters relating to appointment/termination/promotion and all service conditions of Panchayat teacher/Prakhand teacher. Petitioner was also required to exhaust that remedy. This application is being disposed of, giving 2 liberty to the petitioner for exhausting his statutory remedy available by filing an appeal before the Tribunal. In case any such appeal is preferred by the petitioner within four weeks from today, it will be decided and considered on merit by the concerned Tribunal. DKS/ ( Mridula Mishra, J.)