C/él W P IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(5) No. ‘7rZS‘3 /2o1o PETITIONERS \lf/ Mudri’ka Prasad Tiwari, Shri Jagdish Prasud Tiwcri, aged abouf 34 year‘s, Working as AssisTan‘r clerk, Nugar PanchayaT, Bhm‘gon, Dish‘. Surgua (C.G.) 2. Arvind Keshar'i, S/o Shri Murari al Keshari, aged abou’r 34 years, woringhs Assistant erk, Nagar Panchacn‘, Bhafgaon, DisT’r. y Surguja (C.G.) rije Choubey, S/o Bsh Bijendra Devnar‘aya Choubey, aged about 34 ’1 years, working s AssisTanf Clerk, Nagar achaya‘r,fb)h§5§g\‘ 3x, DisTf. Surguja (65.) VERSUS rr" REsPONDENTs :1. sme of Chhattisgasrh, Through - The Principal Secrelary, Departmenl’ of Urban Adminis’rra’rlon and Development Monlralaya at D.K.S. BhaWan, Raipur (6.6.) W a j K L k cl (I n a Pnw WR 2. ” The Under Secretary, Department of Urban Adminisfmfion aT D’K,S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. f Nagar Panchaya’r Bhafgaon, Disff. Surguju. Through i’rs Chief Municipal Officer, Bha‘rgaon, Dish“. Surguja (6.6) 4. The Chief Municipai Officer, Nagar Panchayaf Bhafgaon, Disff. Surguja (C.G.) 5. The Presidenf, Nagar Panchayaf, Bhafgoon, Disff. Surgujd (6.6.) IT PETITION UNDER ARTIcLE 226 OF THE N CONSTITUTION OF INDIA f HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 7253 of 2010 VWRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Aqnihotri, J. Present: Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Sushi] Dubey, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 21S day of April, 201 1) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties fairly submit that the 'issue with regard to applicability of circulars dated 23/09/2010 and 05/03/2008 was considered in Virendra Das > Manikpuri & Others v. The State of Chhattisgarh.& Othersl. This Court, after hearing all the parties, considered the issue and passed the order in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others’. This petition may be disposed of accordingly. 2. Thus, having regarding to the facts situation of the case, wherein the issue involved in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Other31 as well as in this case are one and the same, the instant petition stands disposed of in the same terms and/orderivpassed in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others’. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge . Arun 1W.P.(S) No. 7450 of 2010, decided on 10.02.2011 PETITIONERS : Mudrika Prasad Tiwari & Others VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others