IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (227) N0$T3® /2010 RESPONDENT : DEFENDANTS PETITIONER : SMT.JUGRI BAI 1’ PLAINTIFF W/o Tularam Satnami, aged about Tah311 55 years, Nag‘ggarh, Réo Village District Amora Duré (C.G.) A Versus SMT. PATAYA BAI @ Paira Bai W/o Late Punau Satnami, aged about 63 years, GOPALA S/o Late Punau Satnami, aged bout 43 years, / 3. GOPCHAND S/o Late Punau Satnami, aged about 41 years, / 4. SUKNAND‘A’N S/o Late Punau Satnami, aged about 38 years Respondent NO. 1 to 4 resident of Village Kharhari, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Durg (C.G.) BHURI Bai D/o Late Punau Satnami, aged about 35 years, MUNNI Bai W/o Ram Mohan and D/o Late Punau Satnami, aged about 33 years, Respondent NO. 5 and 6 both resident of Village Khurmudi, Nagwagaon, Tahsil Bernetara, District Durg (C.G.) x 7. SMT. VIMLA BAI W/o Yogesh and D/o Late Punau Satnarni, aged about 28 years, R/o Village g Jeetpur, Tahsil Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 8. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Through: The Collector, Durg (C.G.) 11 1 /'/. , ya W, Wm,m . WWWSW© ? O WW am m (W4) ,\>\% mmo mmm WW§WW aKaiEmm S.B. Hon’ble Shri Justice N.K. A 10.01.2011 None for the petitioner. Shri Sudhir Verma with Sn respondent No. 1 to 7, Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Pane] tgarwal t. Shabnam Khan, Advocates for Lawyer for the State. The matter is called for heaing twice. On both the occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. In view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/ N.K.AgarWaj Judge I"\'