IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND NINE PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6113 of 2005 Between: M. Sundara Rao … Petitioner AND The Mandal Revenue Officer, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : None This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6113 of 2005 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the allotment of a site in the backyard of the house of the petitioner in favour of the vendor of the 4th respondent by the 1st respondent is illegal, arbitrary and call for the records pertaining to the allotments of Chinawaltair colony and to know about the right, title to possession and enjoyment of the waste land, left over site etc., being the part and parcel of the acquired land by the erstwhile T.P.T. Cater to the needs of the development of the city and to set aside the alleged allotment alleged to have been made in favour of the vendor of the 4th respondent as it is without any authority.” When the matter was taken up on 04.03.2009, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition was adjourned to today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, when the matter is taken up, there is no representation for the petitioner. It is therefore reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting his cause in the writ petition. The writ petition is therefore dismissed for default. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition for default, WPMP.No.8120 of 2005 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 06.03.2009 ES