Civil Writ Petition No. 6415 of 2008 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. Civil Writ Petition No. 6415 of 2008 Date of Decision: 16.5.2008 Balbir Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others. …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. B.R.Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ashutosh Mohunta, J. (Oral) The challenge in the writ petition is to the award dated 6.11.2007 (Annexure P3) passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court-II, Faridabad, vide which the reference was answered against the petitioner. The petitioner was engaged as Chowkidar in Government Middle School, Garhi Patti, Hodal on 5.7.1995. His services were terminated on 20.6.1996. The petitioner raised an industrial dispute that his services have been terminated without following the procedure laid down in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and no retrenchment compensation has been paid. The Labour Court returned the findings that the petitioner has no right on the post for his absorption, and regularization as he was engaged as daily water and no consequential benefits flow to daily Civil Writ Petition No. 6415 of 2008 2 wager in public employment. The Labour Court has also relied on the judgment of Hon'ble the Apex Court reported as Secretary, State of karnataka and Others v. Uma Devi and Others (2006)4 Supreme Court Cases 1. After going through the impugned award, we are of the considered opinion that the name of petitioner was not requisitioned by the Employment Exchange nor he was engaged in pursuance to any advertisement issued by the respondents, hence, he has no right of reinstatement. The case of the petitioner is squarely covered against him vide judgment rendered in Uma Devi's case (supra). In view of the above, we find no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. (Ashutosh Mohunta) Judge (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge May 16, 2008 “DK”