In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 2732 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 14.5.2009 Krishna ..... Petitioner vs Mohinder Singh and others ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Vikram S. Punia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 15.4.2009 passed by the learned court below whereby the application filed by the petitioner for being impleaded as one of the defendants in the suit filed by Balbir Singh and Anup Singh against Mohinder Singh for possession by way of partition, was dismissed. The application has been filed by the wife of Mohinder Singh. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in an earlier litigation between the parties, the suit filed by the petitioner for declaration regarding the same property, a compromise was effected and in terms thereof, the property in question was given to the petitioner and consequent thereto she is in possession of the property. As dispute pertains to the same property, she is a necessary party. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any merit in the submissions made. It is a suit for partition of the property amongst the brothers. The earlier litigation which is sought to be relied upon by the petitioner to claim that the property in question was given to her by way of compromise is of no consequence for the reason that admittedly ultimately the earlier suit filed by the petitioner against the respondents, was dismissed. As a result thereof, all interim orders passed therein are also of no effect. Accordingly, no illegality can be found with the order passed by the learned court below rejecting the application of the petitioner for impleading her as necessary party. Resultantly, the petition is dismissed. 14.5.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge