HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.fS) No. 1834 of 2007 Petitioners Versus Respondents 1. Saiyad Unush Ali Age daout 46 year, Assit. Teocher S/o Saiyod Abbas Ali Shitalopara, Konker Bbck - Kanker, Distt. - Kanker (C.6.) 2. Ramn<royan Sdiu Age about 46 yeor. Headmaster S/o 5hri Shukh Rom Sahu, Prim<ry 5chool Koda9aon, Block - Kanker, bistt. - Kanker (C.6.) 3. Bwishj Lal Sdhu Age obout 45 year, HeadmosteT S/o Shri Johawam Sdiu Primary School Kishanpin-i, Charama Block- Charama, distt. - Kanker (.C.6.) 1. State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretory, Tribal Welfwe Oeportment & Education beportment, D.K.S. Bhawan, &istt.-Raipur (C.6.) 2. Distriet Education Officer, Kanker, DIstrict - Kanker (C.6.) 3. Block Educotion Officer, Kanker, Distpict - KarAer (C.6.) 4. Block Education Officer Charomo, District- Konker (C.©.) 4. Treaaire & Accounts Kanker Oistrict-Kanker (C.6.) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Ayihotri, J Present: Mr. Somkant Vermo, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Oeepati Pandey, Panel Lcavyer for the Stote. .'StAhfKh ORDER (Posised on this 29th twy of Morch, 2007) 1. The question of law invoh/ed herein (sto whether the petitioners are entitled to regulor pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment' or from the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appeoring for the petitioners as wetl os for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved the present writ petition are the same to that of in W. P. (S) No. 813/2007 (Rwn Kumar Sdiu and others vs. State ©ovt.of Chhattisgarh <S another), which wos allowed vkle order dated 12.02.2007. 3. In vieui of the above-stated siAflnissions made by learned counsel for •the parties, ttie writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge