IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23954 of 2011 Raj Kishore Singh, Son of late Sitaram Singh, resident of Village Hari Chak, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Begusarai. -------Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar. 2.The Vigilance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. -----Opposite Parties ------------------ 03/- 18/11/2011 Heard Mr. Amrendra Kumar learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Arvind Kumar learned counsel for the Vigilance- opposite party no. 2 and Mr. Abhay Kumar - 1 learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon/xerox copy of the case diary up to paragraph –86 dated 23.06.2011. The petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7/13(1) of the P.C. Act, 1988, is one of the named accused in this case being Nazir of a particular block in whose custody, the cheques prepared and signed in the name of beneficiaries of Indira Awas Yojna was found. Submission is that such cheques were issued and sent to the post-master, but returned in absence of opening of accounts in the names of such beneficiaries. Moreover, there is allegation of taken of Rs. 5,000/- is only against Block Development Officer, nothing against the petitioner, who had no concern with any other process of such scheme and its execution. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Vigilance – II, Patna, in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 04 of 2011, corresponding to Special Case No. 09 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)