IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.662-M of 2011 Date of Decision:6.4.2011 Raju .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. J.S. Bains, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of direction to the respondents to decide pending premature release case of the petitioner. Reply has been filed on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2. As per the reply, the case of the petitioner is under the active consideration before respondent No.1. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to decide the premature release case of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within 3 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. 6.4.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE