IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1399 of 2008 LILA DEVI W/o Shyam Kishor Prasad Singh and D/o Sri Ram Avtar Prasad Singh and on behalf of her lunatic father Sri Ram Avtar Prasad Singh,l S/o late Darshan Singh, as guardian defecto, well-wisher, next friend, R/o vill-Barama, P.O. Sarai, P.S. Sheikhpura, Dist-Sheikhpura. Versus 1. Munia Devi , W/o late Jwala Singh. 2. Arjun Singh. 3. Rajeshwari Singh / both are sons of late Dev Narayan Singh. 4. Sri Kant Singh. 5. Brajesh Singh. /Both sons of late Bachchu Singh. 6. Surendra Singh S/o late Jwala Singh. All residents of village Barama, P.O.-Sarai, P.S. Sheikhpura, dist-Sheikhpura. ----------- 2. 22.06.2011 Heard counsel for the petitioner. The prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the learned Subordinate Judge, Sheikhpura to dispose of Title Partition Suit No.25 of 1994 within a time frame. The case is of private nature and there are no official respondents. However, the present petition has been filed by the plaintiff in which private defendants have been made respondents 1 to 6. In view of the nature of the prayer and the order which this Court proposes to pass, since no prejudice is going to be caused to the private respondents, the matter is being disposed of with a direction to the concerned Court to dispose off the matter at the earliest and in any case within two months from the date of production of a copy of this order. The court would like to add here that learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after closing of evidence even final arguments have been made but for some reason or the other, the court is not passing any order. On a query as to whether the Presiding Officer has changed, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the same Presiding Officer still is in the office. Thus, this Court feels that there is no impediment in him delivering the judgment especially after he has heard the arguments. Further it is in the interest of justice and it is also desirable and contemplation of the law that judgments are delivered within the time fixed for the same and should not be postponed for long periods without any justifiable reason. However, this Court would not like to further comment on this aspect. In view of the direction given above to pass final order in this case, no further direction is required. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed off with the aforesaid direction. Prakash (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)