THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.DURGA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3986 of 2007. ORDER: (Per Goda Raghuram, J) This writ petition is directed against an auction notice dt. 14.2.2007 issued by the 1st respondent Devasthanam proposing to collect parking fee in a parking lot established by the 1st respondent for the period 1.4.2007 to 31.03.2008. The auction notification does not specify the revenue survey number or the village in which the parking lot is situate and therefore the writ petitioner/Kanipakam Gram Panchayat has challenged the auction notice on the ground inter alia that it is violative of Sections 115 and 116 of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and Section 117 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 and asserted in the accompanying affidavit (Para- 13) that there is no mention of the exact location of the parking lot in respect of which tender notification was issued. In the counter affidavit, the 1st respondent Devasthanam equivocally states that the auction notification is issued in respect of the parking lot for which auctions were conducted earlier; that this Court in W.P.No. 19531 of 2004 by its Judgement dt. 18.7.2006, on the basis of a report of an Advocate Commissioner had held that the parking lot and the area in question do not fall within the jurisdiction of the Kanipakam Gram Panchayat but the an extent of Ac. 2.35 cents is situated in S.Nos. 1/3 to 1/16, 1/16A and 2/2 of Punyasamudram Gram Panchayat and therefore the writ petitioner herein who was writ petitioner in W.P.No. 19531 of 2004 as well has no litigable grievance in respect of the parking lot established by the 1st respondent Devasthanam. For several reasons including that the term of impugned auction has already expired, this writ petition has become infructuous. It also requires to be noticed that by an interim order dt. 1.3.2007, a learned single Judge declined to interdict the auction notification and that the writ petitioner filed W.A.No. 212 of 2007 against the order of learned single Judge dt. 1.3.2007(declining to stay the auction). The writ appeal was dismissed on 8.3.2007 and the appellant therein who is the writ petitioner was also imposed costs of Rs. 5,000/-. For all the aforesaid reasons, there are no merits in the writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J _________________________ P.DURGA PRASAD, J 11.07.2011. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.DURGA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3986 OF 2007 Dt. 11.07.2011.