® IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S)_ 2010 (S.B) m PETITIONER RESPONDENTS \^<^..--'" ^>^Ay ^'--H'-·· -•" ^- (<y ..-•^0 SmtVinitaNaidu, W/o Shri R.K.Naidu, Aged about 55 years. Occupation- Principal Government High School Sejbahar, Block Dharsiwa Tahsil and District - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1.' State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Secretary, School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director Public Instructions/ IVIanaging Director Rastria Madhayamik Shishka Mission Pension Bada, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. District Education Officer/ District Project Officer Rastria Madhayamik Shishka Mission, Pension Bada, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. FOR THE 1SSUANCE OF DIRECTION (S) OR ORDER(S). 'Svl -SIW\^i\, OTfly'IS. (s(MI'Mii< ww'trgim^ .U'.f.:..^.?^-1%<°^ "OT, 200/ aii^rqiT R-li.etl 311^1 ^mN"?Tf?cE sn^I^RITWHftCT &B.:_H^guB.JUSnCE^R.,.P8IT 15-12-2010 ^ Shri V.Vijay, counsel for the Smt. SrattaQhai, P.L. forthe Grievance of the petitioner in 22.7.2010, she was transferred fr Dharsiwa, District Raipur to Govt Dharsiwa, Raipur and she gave herji 27.7.2010 but tiii date the salaiy has It has been submitted by th she has made number of representa till date no order Kas been passed b; petitioner submits that the petitions low paid employee and has not months and therefore, direction n| pending representation of the oetitioi State counsel submits that sl direction is issued to the resp. representation. Considering the facts and present case is disposed cf with 4 immediately pass appropriate orderf Detitioner. This be done positively w< receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to resp. No.3 and also send a copy of tt[ Certilied copy today. chl<4cT<ft'f'tn<H(rff'^ f^^ -(.f^^K ^TsrfSgtTan^r ttitioner. Itate. the present petition is that on >m Go'/t. High Schoo!, Sakara High School Sejbahar, Block |iining to the transferred place on not been paid to her. counsel for the petitioner that (ions (Annexures P/2 8s P/3J but the resp. No.3. Counsel i'or the r is facing hardship as she is a bejen paid saiary for the last five i8.y be issued for deciding the ;r. le has no objection if any such No.3 for deciding the pending arcumstances of the ca.se, the direction to the resp. No.3 to in respect of the salary of the thin three weeks from the date of iubmit the copy of this order to e same to the other respondents. Sd/- : Pritinker Diwakar Judge