IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3458 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO. 3458 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO. 3458 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (LODG) NO. 820 OF 2006 (LODG) NO. 820 OF 2006 (LODG) NO. 820 OF 2006 IN IN IN MISC. MISC. MISC. PETITION NO. 54 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 54 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 54 OF 2002 IN IN IN TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 407 OF 1998 PETITION NO. 407 OF 1998 PETITION NO. 407 OF 1998 1. Smt.Sukhrajidevi D. Gangadin Yadav ] .. Appellants (since deceased) & 4 ors. ] (Ori.Petnrs.) Versus Shri Housilaprasad J. Yadav ] .. Respondent (Ori.Respondent) Mr. V. Ramakrishnan with Ms. Sunita Kalwar for the appellants. Mr. E.K. Sasidharan for the respondent. CORAM: R.M. LODHA, & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED: 10TH NOVEMBER, 2006 P.C. : . We heard the counsel for the parties. 2. The Appeal suffers from delay of 39 days. It appears that the delay occurred due to illness of the appellants’ Advocate. We are, thus, satisfied that the appellants were prevented by sufficient cause in filing the Appeal in time. : 2 : 3. We, accordingly, condone the delay in filing the Appeal. 4. Office is directed to process the Appeal and post it for admission. . Notice of Motion stands disposed of. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [J.H. [J.H. [J.H. BHATIA, J.] BHATIA, J.] BHATIA, J.]