J^^^y^".. ......•••^'^1^^.--" .^••^ft^-'-^fcl.l^^'" ^flF RCn-nii ^'•L- ~ ..°-'•' ?<ese'"' .....-•" Aa^8'&.-•••• c^^ In^TKEJilGrLCQURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR W.P. !S1 N0. s"a.7/ 2006 Petitioner Versus Respondents / 1. ^?'cos tr-o.^' c^^ ^' ^ ^^ 2. y Sohan Ram Bhagat, S/o Bhola Ram Bhagat, Aged about 36 years R/o Village SE P.0. - Gamharia Dist: Jahspur-(C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through -. The Upper Secretary Department of Agriculture, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) The Dy. Director Agriculture Jashpurnagar, Dist: Jashpur-fC.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION QFJNDIA XI-HC-22 sn^r^r f^IR;3n^T sbiroHfi?T Sbllti padma «^ 73f -^W\v\^, WiS\VW, l°K'lltiy 3TT^?T iRlth H11MI 9)<<lth—^.?..U1...?T.?:^ ^ 200 £, Ri<>«d sn^rCTaiWHfef 18.10.2006 Shri Arun Shukla, counsel Shri Sanjay S A9rcwal, 6^\ l-1eard on admission and on| Petitioner was initiclly app^ Vide order dated 20.03.2006/17.1 snd was posted as driver in the 0| State Sovernment vide impuansd transferred the petitioner to Raii Learned counsel for thel transfer policy has been violatei^ impugned order has committed senior-ity 'is concerned, it is bein; framed by the State Sovernment. In view of the above, I am may cal! for any interference in th is liable to be dismissed and is acc In the light of above 01 disposed of. •=bl'S|td<fl.1 t<|l|<-f)'fftel^<fa«l< ^aif^Tsn^r •or the petitioner. for the State. M.(W.)P.No.4359/2006. inted as a driyer on contin9ency psid basis. 54.2006, he was given regular appointment fice of Dy birector, Agriculture, Jashpur. yder dated 01.07.2006 (AnnexureP/1) hos iarh. petitioner failed to demonstrate how and how Sovernment, while passing the ^nalafide against the petitioner. So far regularised by the Ruies and regulations of the opinion that there is nothing which ^ impugned order. Therefore, the petition irdingly dismissed. tler, IA Nos.10189 A 10190/2006 stand Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge (ifl^^fe^) ^.'