IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 2877 OF 2005. NO. 2877 OF 2005. NO. 2877 OF 2005. Tikamdas T.Manwani. ... Plaintiff. Versus. Mrs.Irene Crasto & others. ... Defendants. Shri Sanjay Jain for the Plaintiff. Shri Sandeeop Dalal for the Defendants Nos.1a to 1g and Defendnts Nos.2 and 3. Shri Mukesh Jain for Defendant No.4. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 2nd November, 2007. : 2nd November, 2007. : 2nd November, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned Counsel for the parties stated that the Plaintiff and Defendant No.4 are personally present. Constituted Attorney of Defendant Nos.2 and 3 is also present. Constituted Attorney of Defendant No.1(a) is also present. 2. By consent of the parties, the following order is passed: (i) With the consent of the parties, proposed Defendant No.4 is directed to be added as Defendant No.4 in the suit. Amendment to be carried out within a period of four weeks from today. (ii) Consent terms signed by the Plaintiff and : 2 : 2 : 2 : the Defendants including the newly added Defendant No.4 and their respective Advocates is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. Decree in terms of the consent terms. (iii) In view of the Decree in terms of the consent terms, the suit stand disposed of. (iv) In view of the disposal of the suit, Notice of Motion No.3151 of 2005 stands disposed of. (v) Refund of Court fees as per Rules. (vi) No order as to costs. (vii) Parties to act on an authenticated copy of the order and the consent terms. (viii) Drawing up of the decree is expedited. Judge. Judge. Judge.