IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.510 of 2009 …………….. 1. SUJEET KUMAR, S/O Sri Ramdeo Paswasn, r/o village4 Alinagar, P.S. Sare, District Nalanda. 2. Sambhu Kumar Pandit, s/o Ram Govind Pandit, r/o village Manpur, P.S. Haveli Kharagpur, District Munger. 3. Birendra Kumar, s/o Rajeev Ranjan Kumar, r/o Bhagatpur, P.S. Pero Bazar, District- Munger. ……………..Petitioners/ Appellants. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Director General-cum-Inspector General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Addl. Director General of Police, Headquarter, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Munger. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Munger- Cum- Chairman, Board no.1 of Constable Appointment, Munger. ……………….Respondents/ Respondents. ……….. For the Appellant: Mr. JAGNNATH SINGH & Mr. BRIJITA PRAKASH, Advocates. For the Respondent/s: Mr. Satyadeo Kumar (SC12) ………….. 4 15.07.2011 Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he is not pressing the case as against appellant nos. 1 and 3. Therefore the appeal as against appellant nos. 1 and 3 stands dismissed. Sofar as appellant no.2 (Sambhu Kumar Pandit) is concerned, his main grievance is with regard to non appointment on the post of police constable on the ground that even though he belongs to extremely backward class his case was considered under the category of backward class, hence he lost his chance to be appointed as police constable. Learned counsel for the appellant has further submitted that the person having lesser marks and younger in age has been appointed and hence there should be a direction to the respondents to appoint him also. 2 As the controversy cannot be resolved at the present stage as some information is lacking with regard to appointment of the concerned person who has also not been made party to the present appeal, without going into merits of the case of the parties, it would suffice if a direction is given to the appellant to file a representation for redressal of his grievance. Accordingly, liberty is granted to the appellant no. 2 to make an appropriate representation to the Director General- cum-Inspector General of Police, Bihar Patna (Respondent no.2) with all details as has been mentioned in this appeal, and as and when such representation is filed the respondent no.2 is directed to consider the same in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. With the above observations and directions this L.P.A. stands disposed off. Abhay Kumar ( T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)