THE mGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WMT PETITION N0. ^4-,/2006 t,-» ^- 2. 3. A.A. Firdosi, S/o- Shri Abdul Hamid, Aged about 54 years, Sub Engineer, W.R.D. Presently working as In-charge S.D.O. in R.E.S-, Bagicha, on deputation, Distt. Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS PETITIONER State ofChhattisgarh, Through - Secretary, Department ofWater Resources, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, C.G., .^ «^^ ^..^s./" -y The Engineer-in-Chief, Department ofWater Resources Raipur, C.G. >^y .^'y^" -^•y^ State ofMadhya Pradesh, Through - Secretary, Department ofWater Resources, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, M.P. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE ^26/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI ETC. ^F XI-HC-22 7^ -lll'illd'4, '^TlRPre, i<<ivt!*i1< anCT^ii R-fi<*i sn^i ^H ^{T?^ "5-. 9£ Gowri Ki«?n'sitiT'* .MJ.^.M 311^1'^(iTwglttt 21.4-2006 Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, coun ??rafepte'RTR?ff'? fti^t iteaR i73lPCT3H^T sel for the petitioner. Shri G.K. Beriwal, Dy. Advd.cate General and ShriA.S. Kachhawaha, Govt. Advcwate for the State of Chhatj:isgarh. Heard. Learned counsel for the pjetitioner submits .that the pefltioner was appointed in the year 1979and h^ junior to him were promoted. Soifie pereons filed petitions before the State Administratwe Tribunal, which was ?llowed by the Tribunal vide its order dated 15-2-1999 as per Anhexure-P/3. It i4 submitted thatsimilar persons situated with the petitioner are also filed writ petitii Others vs. State of Chhattisaarh In view of the above submissi 15-2-1999 passed by ttie Madhy^ Bench. The pdtioner is entitled totl has not been promoted whereas persons an No.160/2002 (Umesh Chandra Sinati & & OOiers}, the same has been decided by this Court vide order dated 20-2-20p6 (Annexure-P/8). Learned counsel prays for sirailarorder in thiscasa^also. Not opposed. » an, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner in accorjiance with the judgment and order dated Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Bhopal fe same relief with all consequential ben^ts of promotion etc. on the post accotjding to his seniority, pursuanf to ttie ord^r dated 15-2-1999 passed bythe Ma<fhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal on the higher post w.e.f. the same date w|ien juniors of the petitioner were gh/en the promotion and other consequential b^nefits. In viewof the foregoing, the wi]it petition is allowed. No orderas to costs. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [Tff^^Ha^ e r