5 I IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. (S) No. '7 ^i IWW- S^>\\ PETITIONER \° ^'^^^-- ^i^^.-^: Smt. Arvinder Kaur W/o Shri Manjeet Singh, Aged about 49 years, Occupation - Lecturer, Govt. Hir. Sec. School Chandkhuri Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Educatipn Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) -2. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OR INDIA 1 •^f.—^ "~°t C-22 sn^^i ft-iid) S^V ^.Hlti V^ -+- \3 -S^SI ^l^td-f, S*Ti1ti'l!o, faoi'Hy "q?^ ..Q..:'^...-^rlli ^IWITW:lte'"""" """"'ff^ 20° sn^r T^iiw^to SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohah Shrivastava.J 10^1.201-! Shri Vipin Tiwari, counsei for| Shri Ajit Singh, Panei Lawyei|for Heard. the petitioner. the Statefrespondente. Learned counsei appearing f<>r the petitioner submits ftat the petitioner is entitled to beneflt of twoadvan^e incremente on account of she having passed B.Ed examination before submitted that the issue involved integra and the same has been fina it is further submitted that thl incremente as per cireular dated 21i cbl^d'4l'1 ^l^cif "^ ^^ ^-^K '^aipinai^i her appointment at her own cost. It is |in the present petition is no ionger res |ly decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cas6 of Asha Saxena vs. Sfbte ofM.P. & Ofs.. 2009 flll) MPJR (SC) 59. Court has also taken a similar view in te order dated 06-02-2009 passed in V^.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Leamed counsel for the petitioner further draws (ittentfon of this Court to order dated 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal lflo.124 of 2009, wherein relying upon the jucfgment of the Supreme Court in tfie case of Asha Saxena {supra) and the order passed by this Court in ancjther Writ Appeal No.87/2(M», directions have been issued fbr consideratioh <rf the case for grant of two advance -09-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification oftfie tect^ pleaded in the petition. Leamed counsel for the respcjndents submits that case of the petitioner wouid also be considered on the saifie lines. in view of the statement made above, this petidon is finally dteposed off with a direction to the respondent authoriiies to consider and decide the ciaim ^ -; in'ir '2-0 Xt-HC-22 •S^ "1|1'1<1(YI-4, t9T?l'M'IS, (aldl'Hy 31T^?T T^^P ...^l^..^..^/^ wiRTrgitii<»> fa^ST' 311^1 •^I ft-fidi ail^r 'gr.qNT^lfe^l '*l''<(<'t<fl-l ifPRtf 4 felzt <pi]«l< ^aiBgiTan^r )SUS8 Ds&jrfi of the petftioner for grant of two 21-09-1974 issued by the State of facts pleaded in the petition within a afltvance increments as per circular datod (fladhya Pradesh, after verification of the |?eriod of eight weeks from toctay. Sd./- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge in [1