-^ ^~^.'y ^ IN THE HON'BLE C^IHATTISGARII HIiQH COORt AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No. "h 13 of 2010. fRelated Writ Petition (C3va} No. 1490/ 2010 "Navdeep Singh Chawla Vs. Stai Chhattisgarh &0rs" dismissed for want of prosecution todayon 06.12.2010]. ^gjie Bencff PETITIONER: Smgh Cliawla S/o Trilochan Singh Chawala, aged about 38 years, all R/o Surjeet Niwas, 3/51, Ravi Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS .^.-'-1 ,RESPONpEN1:S: 0-1^ State of Chhattisgarh through their Chief s^C ..'".A' ..•'^ Secretaiy, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, *• . ^^ -<* ^ ^<^ .••^ Raipur, Chhattisgarh ^'^^..•V';v °2^ Sub Divisional Officer, Land Acqisition ^'.^•''^^ ^ Officer, Raipur, Tahsil: Raipur, ^ Chhattisgarh: 0^< Collectorand Ex-officio Deputy Secretary, Revenue Department, Chhattisgarh Govemmeiit, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. OJ^ Naya Raipur Development Authority, In front of the Mahanadi Dwar, Mantralaya, Raipur - 492001, Chhattisgarh. Through: Their Chief Executive Officer. APMCATION FORRESTORWnONOFWRITPETmON{C)No.l490/2010, It is most rcspectfully siibmitted as under: \} HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. N0.713 OF 2010 Petitioner Navdeep Singh Chawla Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OFW.P.(C) N0.14QO/2010 (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnjhotri, J.) Present:- Shri Rajkamal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORALl (Passed on 08th day of December, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the counsel for the petjtioner could not appear on account of bona fide mistake, therefore, W.P.(C)No.1490/2010, which was dismissed on 06.12.2010 may be restored to its file. It appears that the petition was dismissed on account of mistake of the Advocate himself. This application has been filed immediately on the next date i.e. 7.12.2010. Though, it is well settied that an appljcation or petition etc. filed in the Court should not be supported by an affidavit of Advocate. However, in the facts of the case, where the mistake was on the part of the Advocate, and he has expressed regret, the above-stated requirement of flling of affidavit of the applicant/petitioner in support of the application or pet'rtion etc. is dispensed with. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P.(C) No. 1490/2010 is restored to the original file. A copy of this order be piaced on record of the original writ petition and the same be listed for hearing. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Ashok