IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. E31 ’¥ /2005 ,{‘ \ ~»,._ PETITIONERS /1] Kumari Anita / Kujur of Shri Jems Kujur, aged 27 Resident of years, Nagar, Station Road, Distt. Janjgir-Champa [C.G.]. /2] Vikas Saxena sorrof Chandra Saxena, aged 25 Resident of years, Maharana Pratap Chowk, Korba [C.G.] /3] Arvind Lahmor Son or Bhagwat Prasad, about l ." Prasad, aged Resident of ~. 3O years, Chandniya Para, Para, Janjgir, Janjgir-Champa [C:G.] r‘. J «J {:‘ffb /4] Ajeet Rathore son of y b son Shankar Lal é” a“, 6* Rathore, about 23 years, Resident Chandniya Janjgir, Distt. para, Janjgir—Champa [C.G.] /5] Vinay Sahu of son Ramratan about Sahu, aged Resident of years, Chowk, Janjgir, Distt. Champa [C.G.] /6] Kurnari Sita Baghel of Shri Budeshwar, Baghel, aged about 25 years, of Bhatapara, Distt. Janjgir, Janjgir-Champa [C.G.] Kumari Geetanjali Daughter of Shri Chandrahas Karsh, aged about 23 aged years, Resident of Sitamadi, Korba [C.G.] Kumari 1/8] Anjana Rathore, Daughter of Shri Leelambar Rathore, aged about 25 aged years, Resident of Purani Purani Basti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa [C.G.] /9/] Smt. Pavrem Pavrem Minz wife of Shri S. Minz, about 35 aged years, Resident Smt. Megha Rathore wife of Shri Ashok Singh, aged about 25 years, Resident of Village Sarkhon, Distt. Janjgir- Champa [C.G.] Kamal Sande Son of Shri Sunauram, aged about 27 years, resident of Bhatapara, Janjgir, Distt’ Janjgir-Champa. 12] Soncharan Dadsena, son of Shri Firaturam, aged about 27 years, Resident of Bamhanidih, Distt. Janjgir—Champa [C.G.] VERSUS Guru Ghasidas University through the Registrar, Koni, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur [C.G.] r 2] ThePrincipal Thakur Chhedilal Law College, Janjgir, Distt. ,,,Janjgir—Champa[C.G]. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/ 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION i OF INDIA RESPONDENTS / 1] / / 1 1 nA D'Nnr n A DgJJE‘ 'T‘LIE‘ DWI’T‘IHNFPQu VJ 1’ 16-3-2005 > Heard Mr‘ V.K. Pandey, coun These twelve petitioners‘ wr provisional admission in the 3'“ y examination of LLB in the year 2C Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, however, they were allowed to ap sel for the petitioners. o Were students of LLB 2"“ year, now taken ear course, appeared in the 2"“ year nnal 04 and were declared fail in the subjects of as also the Accommodation Control Act, 1961, r in the supplementary examination. These petitioners along with other 18 stud nts appeared in the supptemeritary examination and out of total 30 students, 29 st ents have been declared fail. The petitioners were surprised to know that out of 0 students, 15 students have been given 0-15 thing very extraordinary, therefore, from this very fact it appears that the answer heete were not evaluated correctly in the given situation, lear marks in these papers, which is s counsel for the petitioners requested that the petitioners may be allowed to m ke a representation to the Registrar of the University to raise their grievances and the Registrar be directed to consider their representation. Having heard learned ooun ei for the petitioners and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the ase, the petitioners are allowed to make a representation to the Registrar of he University within a period of ten days from today, and the Registrar shall loo into the representation made by the petitioners and decide the same after getting e answer sheets of the petitioners screened by some experts of the subject as to hether the evaluation was done correctly or not, within a period of two months from he date of receipt of the representation. With the directions above, t e petition stands disposed of. Consequently, l.A.Nos.179 [2005 and 1791/2005 also stand disposed oft M i Parties are entitled for certi ed copy of this O - g y, Sdl— L.C.Bhad°° Judge (whoa) ‘ e n a