IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 10996 of 2009 Between: Fazal Mohammed Omer Qayyum S/o. Late Sri M.A Qayyum R/o. H.No. 3-6-54, Feel Khana Street, Nalgonda . ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Special Deputy Collector (LA-AMRP) Unit 1 Nalgonda 2 The Special Collector (LA-AMRP) Nalgonda 3 The District Collector, Nalgoda. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or orders or directions more particualrly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent/ Special Collector (LA-AMRP) Unit 1 Nalgonda in instructing the banker to "Stop payment" with regards to cheque bearing Number 571114 amounting to Rs. 1,51,260/- dt. 31-3-09 and revalidated on 11-5-09 as illegal, arbitrary in violation to Article 14 of the Constitution of India and the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to pay the cost of the cheque value amounting to Rs. 1,51,260/- Rupees ONe Lakhs Fifty one thousand two hundred and sixty only and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.RAYEECE M.A.KHADHIR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : O R D E R:- When this matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a Memo dated 18.06.2009 and submits that in view of the Memo, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. The contents of the Memo are extracted hereunder: “On 06.06.2009, the 1st respondent issued Cheque bearing No.5569985 dated 31.03.2009 revalidated on 11.05.2009 amounting to Rs.1,51,260/- in lieu of Stop Payment Cheque bearing No. 571114, dated 31.03.2009 revalidated on 11.05.2009 amounting to Rs.1,51,260/-. The 1st respondent issued a letter to that effect. Hence, this Memo.” Considering the Memo filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, no orders need be passed in this writ petition, and accordingly, the same is closed. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 24th June, 2009 bcj