IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2010 / 13TH JYAISTHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 154 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.29160/2008 Dated 14/11/2008 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- SURENDRAN, S/O.BHARGAVAN NADAR AGED 50 YEARS, ROADARIKATHU VEEDU KULAVUPARA, ANACODE, VEERANAKAVU,KATTAKADA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.SREEKANTH S.NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- A.V.GEETHA KUMARI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, THIRUVANANATHAPURAM. By K S MUHAMED HASHIM THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J ........................................... CONT.CASE.NO.154 OF 2010 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 3rd DAY OF JUNE, 2010 JUDGMENT An affidavit has been filed by the respondent producing Annexure A4 order dated 20.6.2009. According to the affidavit, Annexure A4 has been issued in compliance with the directions contained in the judgment of this court. In view of the issue of Annexure A4, this contempt case is closed. 2. It is submitted by the counsel that, due to the delay in communicating the order, Annexure A4, the petitioner has lost his right to challenge the said order in appeal. The right of the petitioner to file an appeal is not lost for the reason that the time for filing the appeal can start to run only from the date on which it has been served on him in these proceedings. With the above observations, this contempt case is closed. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE lgk