IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. L.P.A. No. 1853 of 2011 ( O&M ) DATE OF DECISION : 30.09.2011 M/s Rajshri Infotech Pvt. Ltd. (presently known as M/s Rajshri Steels Pvt. Ltd.), Delhi .... APPELLANT Versus State of Punjab and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present: Mr. Rajiv Kataria, Advocate, for the appellant. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) This Letters Patent Appeal has been directed against the order dated September 15, 2011, passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the writ petition (CWP No. 17355 of 2011) filed by the appellant has been dismissed. The main grouse of the appellant in the writ petition (appellant herein) was that entry of Rapat No. 112 dated 18.10.2010 and Rapat No. 181 dated 15.11.2010 made by respondent No.3 on Annexure P-4 i.e. Jamabandi for the year 2007-08, is bad in law. Rapat No. 112 dated 18.10.2010 is with regard to the order dated 16.10.2010, passed by the court of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Khanna in Civil Suit No. 180 LPA No. 1853 of 2011 -2- instituted on 4.9.2010. Similarly, Rapat No. 181 dated 15.11.2010 is with regard to the lis pendens of the order dated 9.11.2010, passed by the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Khanna, in civil suit, titled Pawan Deep Siongh Versus Bhagat Singh etc. and M/s Rajshri Steels Private Limited, Ashok Vihar, Phase II, New Delhi. These are the entries with regard to the orders passed by the Civil Court and a note to that effect has been made on the jamabandi. Prior to that, it appears that these entries had been made in the roznamcha. As such, the same cannot be challenged by way of writ jurisdiction. Rather, if any party is aggrieved against the revenue entries made in the jamabandi i.e. the record-of-rights, then the remedy available to the aggrieved party is provided under Section 45 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887. Learned counsel for the appellant, after arguing the matter for some time, states that the appellant may be permitted to withdraw this appeal with liberty to avail the remedy under the law. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE September 30, 2011 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) ndj JUDGE