1 D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO.39/2009 Teeja & Ors. Vs. State & Ors. Date of Order :: 01-04-2009 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. DEEPAK VERMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.P. GUPTA Mr. Chaitanya Gehlot, for the appellants. Heard on the question of admission. Record perused. One of the unsuccessful petitioners of WP No.1559/07 decided by the learned Single Judge on 5.12.2008, is in this writ appeal challenging the same on variety of grounds. Appellant had filed the writ petition purportedly under Articles 226 of the Constitution questioning the land acquisition proceedings under the Notifications dated 16.2.2006 and 17.5.2006 issued respectively under Sections 4 and 6 read with Section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1984 (hereinafter shall be referred to as 'the Act'). Along with the appellant, there were four more petitioners, but it appears that others have decided, not to file further appeal. All the grounds which have been projected before us, have been considered by the learned Single Judge in detail and it is not necessary to reiterate the same in this order. Ultimately, the following order has been passed by the learned Single Judge:- “In the overall circumstances of the case, however, this Court would not like to make any further comment on this aspect of the matter because, as aforesaid, for the notification having rightly been issued under Section 17 of the Act and enquiry having been dispensed with, the order dated 28.6.2006 could only be treated non-est and ineffective. The submissions as made on behalf of the petitioners remain untenable and are, therefore, rejected.” 2 In the light of this, we are of the opinion that there is no merit or substance in this writ appeal, and it is accordingly hereby dismissed. [N.P. GUPTA],J. [DEEPAK VERMA],CJ. Praveen