IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2173 of 2009 SHATRUDHAN KUMAR son of Late Ramdeo Prasad, R/O Mohalla- Kankarbagh Colony, More Main Road, Near Amla Plaza, C/O Jay Kishun Shaw, Patna.2-. .Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Secretary, Department of Energy, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The Bihar State Electricity Board, through is Chairman, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 4. The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, PESU, Patna 5. The City Eye Entertainment Pvt. Ltd, through its Director, Rajnish Dikshit, Chandralok Apartment, Kankarbagh, Patna.20.- --Respondents. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar Singh For the State : AAG-2 For the Board : Mr. Vijay Kumar Versma ------- 2/ 13.2.2009. Petitioner claims to be the cable television viewer provided by the Cable Service Operators. His prayer is to dispose of his representation (Annexure-2) wherein he has requested the Chairman of the Bihar State Electricity Board, for short ‘Board” not to remove cable wires from the electrical poles of the Board. Mr. Arum Kumar Singh appears on behalf of the petitioner. State is represented by AAG- 2, whereas Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma appears for the Board. It is not the case of the petitioner that it is he who had fixed cable wires on the electrical poles and hence this public interest litigation not to remove the wires from the 2 electrical poles is absolutely misconceived. The Board had issued notice asking the Cable Service Providers and the Internet Service Providers not to use the electrical poles for giving cable lines. It seems that in this public interest litigation, petitioner seeks to espouse the cause of illegal Cable Service Providers and Internet Service Providers. We do not find any merit in the application and it is dismissed with cost of Rs.5000/ to be paid by the petitioner to the Board. ahk (C. K. Prasad,ACJ) (Shyam Kishore Sharma)