THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA SECOND APPEAL No.1175 of 2008 ORAL JUDGMENT: This Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree, dated 25.04.1998, passed by the District Judge, Krishna at Machalipatnam, dismissing the appeal in A.S.No.82 of 2006, and thereby, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 10.04.2006, passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Machalipatnam. Appellant is the unsuccessful plaintiff in both the Courts below. The suit was filed before the trial Court for declaration of title and recovery of possession of the suit schedule property. Both the Courts below, having gone into the merits of the case and also on appreciating the evidence on record, recorded a finding that there was no encroachment of the respondents into the land of the appellant and therefore, no relief as prayed for in the suit could be granted. I have carefully perused the judgments of both the Courts below. I do not find any reason to interfere with the same and also I do not find any question of law much less substantial in this appeal. Hence, the Second Appeal is liable to be dismissed. In the result, the Second Appeal is dismissed, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. It is needless to mention that if the appellant is under the threat of dispossession, it is always open for him to proceed in accordance with law. _____________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 25th June 2010 dr