IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 19 OF 2008 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 19 OF 2008 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 19 OF 2008 M/s. Jenson & Nicholson (I) Ltd..... Petitioner versus M/s. KSL Idustries Ltd. & anr....... Respondent. Mr. Ashish Naik i/b M/s PRS Legal for the petitioner Mr. Yashpal Thakur for Respondent no.1 Mr. J.P. Yagnik APP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 29TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED; 29TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED; 29TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The present petition has been filed by the original accused against a complaint under section 138 of N.I.Act filed by the respondent. During the pendency of the trial the petitioners moved an application purportedly for compounding of the offences. The respondent/complainant opposed the said application and contended that there has been no settlement or compromise reached in between the parties, and thus prayed for rejection of the application for compounding. The order passed by the Magistrate was thus challenged by filing a revision before the Sessions court wherein similar contentions were raised. The revisional court concurring with the view taken by the Magistrate, dismissed the revision and aggrieved thereby the present writ petition has been filed. As the factum of compromise or compounding has been disputed by the respondent, the petitioner cannot succeed. Whatever pleas are available to the petitioner can be very well raised during the trial. There being no merit in the writ petition, the same is summarily dismissed. ......