IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14699 of 2008 MD.NAJMUL ISLAM . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CWJC No.14396 of 2008 WAJDA TABASSUM . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CWJC No.14614 of 2008 PUNAM KUMARI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CWJC No.14470 of 2008 SAMAR FATMA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CWJC No.14603 of 2008 SUNIL KUMAR PASWAN . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CWJC No.14427 of 2008 PRERNA PRIYA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CWJC No.14389 of 2008 REENA RANI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CWJC No.14624 of 2008 DILIP KUMAR PASWAN . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CWJC No.14472 of 2008 NAILA SULTANA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CWJC No.14612 of 2008 ZEENAT PRAVEEN . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with 2 CWJC No.14745 of 2008 OM PRAKASH SINGH . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CWJC No.14388 of 2008 FULDEO YADAV . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CWJC No.14736 of 2008 RAJEEV KUMAR . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CWJC No.14424 of 2008 ABHA KUMARI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CWJC No.14429 of 2008 VIBHA KUMARI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CWJC No.14397 of 2008 ASGAR ALI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CWJC No.14435 of 2008 KRISHNA NAND JHA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 5/ 25.03.2010 Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State in C.W.J.C. No. 14424 of 2008. The statement made in the counter affidavit touches the facts almost in all the writ applications, which have been taken up for analogous hearing. Regarding C.W.J.C. No. 14749 of 2008, Kishore Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar and Ors., it is stated that during the pendency of the writ application, the complaint made by some other 3 candidate against the appointment of Kishore Kumar was taken up by the Tribunal and his appointment has been cancelled. As such, joining of Kishore Kumar has not been accepted by the respondents. In case of other petitioners, it is stated in the counter affidavit that their joining have already been accepted in their respective school by the respondent. Till the date, counter affidavit was filed. The counsel appearing for the State did not have any information regarding joining of petitioner in C.W.J.C. No. 14614 of 2008 Punam Kumari & Vibha Kumari, petitioner in C.W.J.C. No. 14429 of 2008, at the time of the filing of counter affidavit. Today, the counsel appearing for State has received fax message, whereby the information has been sent regarding acceptance of the joining of Punam Kumari and Vibha Kumari in their respective schools. Counsel for the State submits that all petitioners after joining have received payment of their salary. Considering these facts, except C.W.J.C. No. 14749 of 2008 (Kishore Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar and Ors.), all other writ applications are allowed. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)