1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1014/2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4851/2005 (D) Sau. Rupa w/o Sanjay Mukte ...Versus... The State of Maharashtra, Department of Urban Land & Town Planning Mantralaya, Mumbai, through its Secretary and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. [Shri V.G. Deshmukh, Adv. for applicant] [Shri M.A. Kadu, AGP for respdt. No.1] [Shri G.R. Agrawal, Adv. for respdt. Nos.3 & 4] CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 20.04.2011. This is an application for review of the order dated 20.8.2009 made by this Court. Having heard learned Counsel for the review petitioner and having gone through the impugned order under review, I find that this Court under the said order had given ample opportunity to the review petitioner to go to the appropriate authority and take appropriate steps according to law rather than beating around the bush. However, it appears that the review petitioner has chosen not to undertake the proper course of action. Having heard learned Counsel for the review petitioner, I do not think that any error has been committed on the face of record since the 2 order under review reserved all sorts of liberty in favour of the review petitioner to take objections to the proceedings after remand made by the Government before whichever authorities were asked to adjudicate. Despite granting liberty the same has not been availed of. There is no error on the face of record. There is no substance in the Misc. Civil Application. The same is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE ssw