‘ Cy; mwZ/ S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITIOMS} No.3 2°r/201 1. PETITIONER: J/agéshwar Ram, son of Amar Sai, aged about 27 years, Waterman, Pahadi Korwa Ashram, Maltipur, Block Mainpat, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. Kt VEI‘SuS ' Respondents 1. state of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. /Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. ’Kssistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Sarguja,, /Qhhattisgarh. 4. Collector, Sarguja, District Sarguja, £hhattisgarh. 5. Block Education Officer, Block Mainpat, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA wMQ'waQw H 200 Wm (Wu) mwfaaiw WWW WW wm *aifaqm mmm SB : Hon‘bie Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 23.6.2911 Shri C.J.K‘ Rao, counsel for ih a petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State, en advance copy. Learned counsei for the petitic ner eubmiis that the issue reiating to oiaim of contractuai payment to Cook and other empioyees came up fur consideration before this Court in WP. (S) No.l00411‘1 and batch of petitions and after examining the ciaim of the petitions ,rihis Court had directed consideration of the case in those cases. He submits hat the case of the petitioner is covered by the aforesaid order. On the other hand, iearned counsel for the State submits that the representation of the petitioner wouid be decided after due verification. After going through the or er dated 15.4.2011 passed in W.P.(S) No.2004/11, it is apparent that the c se of the petitioner is squareiy covered by the aforesaid order. Therefore, the p titioner is aiso entitted to the same direction in the case. Accordingly, it is directed that if the petitioner makes fresh representation before the concerned authority, ciai ing payment 0t minimum wages appiicabie to a contract empioyee under t e Chhattisgarh Civii $ervice (Contract Appointment) Ruies, 2604, the sam shat! be disposed of in accordance with iaw. within a period of eight weeks tr m the date of submission of representation. in the event of any adverse order, he petitioner woutd be at iiberty to fite writ petition afresh. With the aforesaid direction.t e petition is finaiiy disposed of. Sd/— f ’ a; .-...Manindra Mohan Shrivastava g. -‘ Judge