IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.2252 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION : July 28, 2009 Karam Singh ...Petitioner Vs. Des Raj and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present : Mr.Manohar Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner --- AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH,J. This petition has been preferred against the order passed by Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dasuya dated 19th July, 2008 vide which the complaint preferred by the petitioner under Sections 419,420,465,471 and 120 B IPC has been dismissed on the ground that no ground for proceeding in the case is made out on the basis of the evidence led by the petitioner complainant. I have heard counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record of the case. The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that despite of the fact that out of five daughters of Chuhra son of Mathra one had died on 10.08.2001 i.e. Dhayan Kaur but still respondent Nos.1 and 2 had attested the Shizra Nisaf of deceased Chuhra showing Dhayan Kaur deceased as alive on 13.06.2002. This has led to the mutatiuon regarding the estate of deceased Chuhra being entered by Halqa Patwari on 01.06.2002. The perusal of the record shows that the evidence which has been brought on record does not justify the contention as raised by the petitioner. I any case, the petitioner is not Criminal Revision No.2252 of 2008 -2- an interested party, by this method he intends to grab the land. The trial Court has found no evidence on record to justify the genuiness of summons to the respondents rather no basis has been found to pursue with the complaint as such. The order passed by the trial Court is fully justified and does not call for any interferences by this Court. Dismissed. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) July 28, 2009 Judge ps