In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No.M- 1965 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.3.2010 Satpal ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.J.S.Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Y.P.Malik, DAG, Haryana. Mr.Dhruv Dayal, Advocate, for the complainant. **** SABINA, J. This petition has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 430 dated 9.12.2009 under Sections 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Kharkhoda , District Sonepat. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the parties have entered into a compromise. The petitioner has since Criminal Misc. No.M- 1965 of 2010 (O&M) -2- been acquitted in all other criminal cases registered against him. Learned State counsel, who is assisted by ASI Umeed Singh and learned counsel for the complainant, on the other hand, has admitted the factum of compromise between the parties. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I am of the opinion that the present petition deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. In the event of arrest, the petitioner be admitted to bail subject to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. The petitioner is directed to join investigation as and when required by the Investigating Officer. (SABINA) JUDGE March 12, 2010 anita