IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH TA 110 of 2008 Date of decision:5.8.2009 Raj Rani Petitioner vs Balwinder Singh Respondent Present Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate Mr. NK Manchanda, Advocvate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. The parties are present in person. The petitioner does not want to stay with the respondent on account of his conduct. She is staying at Phul. The respondent has filed an application u/s 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act at Moga. The petitioner being a resident of Phul and not interested to stay with the respondent on account of his conduct, has to contest the application on merits, taking into consideration the comparative convenience of both the parties, it is deemed appropriate to transfer the proceedings u/s 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, initiated by the respondent at Moga to Phul. Accordingly, the petition is allowed, Civil Judge (Sr.D.) Moga is directed to send the file, complete in all respects, to Civil Judge (Sr.D.) Phul. The parties are directed to appear before the learned Civil Judge (Sr.D), Phul on 12.9.2009 for further proceedings. August 5 ,2009 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE