wQH COURT Qt: CHHATTESGARH AT BELASFUR DN2$EQN BENGH SQRAM ' H6N’BLE $HRI Hi. BATTEJ, CJ, HQN’BLE $HR! DR. DESHMQKH, d. W P QQ Ne 27%4 a? 206? DETITEQNER : Dr, Pramod Paharia, S/o Dr,K.N. Gupta, Aged about 29 years, Rio Student of Orthopea'ics, Department of Orthopedics, Dr, Bhimrao Ambedkar Memorial Hospital, Raipur (CG) Versus REEP$NBEE§E§ 1, S’ca‘te of Chha‘ttisgai’n — through the Secretary, Heait'n arrd Famiiy Warfare Deoax‘tment DKS Bhavan; Raipur QRN QRDER §?aseed ea: Ti May, 30W} The following oral order of the Court was passed by H.L. Betta, SJ. : Though the matter is listed for motion hearing, with the consent of learned counsel for both the partiee to the lie, fhe matter is taken up for ‘nnal diepoeal, (2) Aoart from others. Shri P Diwakar, learned 8e‘nior counsel would submit that, for redressal of the grtevanoe of the petit§oner, he has already hled appropriae repreeentation before the respondents. According to him, that representation ought to have been considered by the respondents within a reasonable time, Since that has not been done by the respondents, he requests this Court to issue an appropriate direction to the respondents. Learned senior counsel subméts that the petitioner may be permitted to fite additional representation it any, in support of his earlier representation. (C G ) 2‘ Th‘e ogrector, Medicai Education, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG) 3, The Dean, Pi. Jawahar La! Nehru Memoria1 Medioa‘ CoHege, Raipur (CG) Writ Pe‘r‘liion under Article 226 of the Corrséitution of lndia. Present : Shri P Diwakar, Senior Advocate wiih Shri Ad‘s! Minna}, counsel for the petitioner Shri Pras‘nani Mlshra, Add] AG for the Slate! respondents. (3) 1‘ In our Opinion; the request of the leamed counsel appears to be feasonabke and if it is gramed it would not cause any prejudice/inconvenience to any one of the partEes. Therefom, without gcing into the merits or demerits 0f the petitioneWs case, the petition is diepcsed of. Liberty is reserved to the peiificner t0 ’r‘iie additional representation, i any, within a week’s fime from today and if and when suoh represeniation is riled; ihe respondents are directed to consider the (I)ame in accordance with iaw: it it is possibie and permissible after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within 15 days frem the date of receipt of the repreeentationr Ordered. accordingiyr i Sd/- D.R. Deshmukh Judge Sd/- Chief Justice i