'.•&• ^ A^ m THE mGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No^^f2003 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2Z6 OF THE CONSTn'UTION OF BNDIA PETITIONER ^ e'i ' f' s^:-' Bg'boo Ram Maravi 5/0. Shri Manaram Maravi, Aged about 33 years, R/o. Q. No. NE-57 C.S.E.B. Colony (Patharipara) Korba, Tahsil & District-Korba (C.G.) ,^.r^^y"' VERSUS <<e"^^_ ________ &-rJ"RESPONDENTS :^ 1. StateofChhattisgarh Acting through Secretary, Department-bfTechnical Education,Govemment of Chhattisgarh, D.K. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G). 2. Addifional Director, TechniQal Education Directorate, Bairan Bazar, Raipur (C.G.) 3. ThePrincipal, Govt. Polytechnic Korba; Tahsil & District KorBa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION TJNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR jfSSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT / WRTTS, OBbER / ORDERS DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. The petitioner respectfully begs to submit as under:- 1. PARTICULARSOF THE PETITIONER:- As shown in the cause title. sn^i^i wnsii^i ~<4 'S, '<\ i^^^^^ass^^'l 3'sr "41<<'|<?1^, a'fliy*!®,Kirx'H^l !„. kl^ ^^^^^^^^^ «-iS-i.—-lA./-(---t"M^"-<i:—-l-"-*ff3">,( 3li^i'!l^? ('ie<'d's*5p) TEcnWBftffsii^ 1/11/2003 flhe Gcntt. Shri K;A. Ansari fiar Shri AyazNaved, Heard. By this petition undejr petitloner has challenged prayed fot the fiaUowmg ftie rdlieSs: Cburt GfrSG Cbwt Qiburt Octobcr ••(DTtieHon. recordofthe MTheHon. uupustied onNr fliilThe^on. respondent noj month of i thfi drdcr petitioner to.perfbrm {IvjTtiecost (Othe^etiyon^r (V) Any other deemedfitbe Leamed counsel foi senrices of the petltioner ground ttiat the posts wer^ submits ttot after some GRPR/ |?%dvertised. The t^trtionST ;/ • . "' .'••••• -* '^ . • \- £; i*l<l(fl<i!-l 4W<'il'^'fstSt'<^l*{l< ^affirasn^t • petiUoner. Adv., for the State. Article226 of the Constitution, the termlQaQoa oftaisseTvlces. He tias be pleased to callfer ttle from fh&respoiulents; be pleased to quash the onNr (Aiuiexlu'ti-P/9), be pleased ft> diTect;the t3 tapay fhe salarv tbr ffie Octol)cr,2001 and also thcrcaftcr, ofARi^manalaon bejng iltegal fln<l fhe havi^ig tieen depriwed of his right hisklutVi ofltKisipetitiOnfceaIsQawarded fram, the i®sppiMlento. r^liefwhichtfaeHQn.Gcn.irt ^lso giveri to the petitioner.'' Uave the petltloner sabmlts that ttie been wronRlv tenniiiated oii the aboUshed. Leamed counsel further jme poste have been sancttoned and [Bled a petition befiM'e the leamed 13m 000—50,000. ^•^B^^& XI-HG—78 sT^r ^l<-<1<ti 'nsff 3TE^T lll<* •k^c*'1 ^ ^- l^ flllCTI awqt S^^WId^i^'tiI-tf'W^fqE'ii.a^: 1.1.1 200 3i 'tff^^iN3^':T). -<»>i*f(tn<<h qr)H^^ fX^^^H '^affinsn^i ' State^Adininistrative Trtbii^ial, wMieh reieelted the saTne <m the groitnd of being preinat] Thereafter the petltloner fl]|ed an appeal (Annexure-P/1^) before the Eespondent no.2, WKlcIj -ire, Riwmg Uberty to file afresh. is stillpendlng since January, 2002 and tias iiot yef been decid^d. Having cdnsidered th<^ facts and Gireumstances offhecase aiid laaterifllciltrecora.itl^directed fhot fhe appeal (AimexuEe- P/^14) filed by |the petitkm^r be declded by ^fae respondent no.t by a reasonedlOKler, as eaj'ly ^is possitde prefefablv %nthin tm® iiumths &t>m ths date of p ofthe certtQed copy of fhis .•'*:; :- •: i .:;':. OTideTto^arelmn^ Ifanyatlverse ordeTispassed, the petitioner inay;'iavail the l-einedy inclu|dit: i the fitinR of Retitkui beftire this^ eoui't alresli:.- ; Wlth the afi'iTRsaid^oljservations,^ls writ petition stends disposed of, Ctorisequently, M.W.I] . No.2474/03 andLA. No.8191/03 also stand disposed of. Certified copy as per ^ules. Sd/- Fakhruddfn e ii^:',:: ^i^S