*1* s.658.09.6 kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.658 OF 2009 Jasmin K. Ajmera. ..Plaintiff -Versus- Manjulaben M. Rajda wd/o Mathurdas D. Rajda and others. ..Defendants .......... Mr.Sanjay Jain i/b Vinod Mistry & Company, for the Plaintiff. Mr.Sunil Gangan i/b R.M.G. Law Associates, for the Defendant Nos.1, 2 and 4 to 7. Mr.Wasim A. Shaikh i/b Pravin Mehta and Mithi Company, for the Defendant No.3. .......... CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 13th December, 2010. P.C. 1 Mr.Jain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff, states that now the suit claim has been settled even between the remaining Defendant Nos.1 to 7. He tenders two sets of consent terms one between the Plaintiff and the Defendant No.3 and other between the Plaintiff and the Defendant Nos.1, 2 and 4 to 7. 2 The Defendant No.3 is present in the Court and confirms the agreement recorded in the consent terms and states that the same bears his signature, so also, of his Advocate. Equally, the Plaintiff is present in the Court and confirms his signature. 3 In the light of the fact that all co-owners have executed the terms and the dispute between the parties is amicably settled, the consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" and "X-1" for identification. It is stated that other Defendants also confirm their signatures below the *2* s.658.09.6 consent terms and the Defendant No.7 has also confirmed her signature through her constituted power of attorney and that power of attorney is present in the Court. 4 In these circumstances, the suit is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. The Notice of Motion, if any, does not survive in the light of disposal of the suit. Refund of the Court fees as per rules. No costs. 5 The undertakings in clauses-2(g), 2(h), 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 17 and 24 in the consent terms between the Plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 1, 2 and 4 to 7, so also, the undertakings in clauses- 2(g), 2(h), 4, 6, 11 and 18 in the consent terms between the Plaintiff and the Defendant No. 3; are accepted as undertakings to this Court. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)