-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6794 OF 2005 Bharti Kamalakar Gajane....Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors..Respondents Mr. R.M. Mendadkar, for the eptitioenr Mrs. J.S. Pawar, AGP for respondents. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DATE : DATE : DATE : 10TH OCTOBER, 2005 P.C.: . Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The petitioner’s claim is being considered by respondent No.2. The same was forwarded on 24th July, 2003. The petitioner is in employment since 1983. Considering the above, the respondent No.2 to decide the petitioner’s claim within a period of four months from today. In the meantime the petitioner’s services not to be terminated. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)