IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 315 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Smt. Sudaishbala Maik W/o Sri S.S. Maik, R/o Macks Pauli Clinic, Near Hemkund Gurudwara, Laxmanchula Road, Kotwali, Rishikesh, District Dehradun. 2. Smt. Geeta Mishra W/o Sri Sabhanand Mishra, R/o Mayakund, Kotwali, Rishikesh, District Dehradun. 3. Indra Bahadur Mishra S/o Sri Ram Krishan Mishra, R/o Mayakund Kotwali, Rishikesh, District Dehradun. 4. Sabhanand Mishra S/o Sri Yogendra Mishra, R/o Mayakund Kotwali Rishikesh, District Dehradun. .......... Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal. through Home Secretary, Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 2. Station House Officer, P.S. Rishikesh, District Dehradun. 3. Narendra Kumar Sharma S/o Late Rajkumar Sharma, R/o 102/168 Ashutosh Nagar, Rishikesh, P.S. Kotwali, District Dehradun. 4. Nand Lal S/o Sri Chela Ram, R/o Fatehabad, District Agra. .......... Respondents None for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. None for respondents Nos. 3 & 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Petitioner’s counsel absent. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. None for respondents Nos. 3 & 4. 2. Mr. H.C. Pande, learned Addl. Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners Smt. Sudaishbala Maik, Smt. Geeta Mishra, Indra Bahadur Mishra and Sabhanand Mishra seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them, now, has become infructuous, as the Police, after the completion of the investigation, has submitted final report in the case before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 03.07.2006 03.07.2006 G