t-'^~~-'--^.A c^^ ^ ~^tv1 •..'W-S&Sf' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR Single Bench (Criminal CRIMINAL APPEAL N0. ^ OF 1997 CF0000061865 APPELLANTS ^. k^ E.... „;„.»<•-<<•"• "V.- I'.Sstanand S/o Bhagwan Nlhora Tlwar-l, aged about 30 years, ^i' 2.Ramariand S/o Bhagwan Nibora Tiwar.t, aged about 22 years, ^S.Munna -@ Narid Kuinar S/o Bediram Kurmi, aged about 24 years, ]3^4.RaiiJl S/o Bediram Kurmi, aged about 27 years, ^S.Pardeshi S/o Raghu SatnAni, aged about 50 years, ^/'6.Gandhu @ Umedi S/o Mayaram Kurini, aged about 50 years, ^ 7.Dukhidas S/o Mobaa SatBara, . aged about 40 years, ,,8,Radhe S/o Chaturgan Kunni» aged about 40 years, All Residents of village Dabari, PolJ.ce Statien Kunda,Bistt.BjLlaspur (K.P.) VERSUS RESPONDENT; State of Madhya Pradesti. CRIKINAL APPEAL UNDER SECTION 374 (2) OF CODE 0E CRirECNAL e56cEDURE,1973, r. i •a-HC—78 *(i*1W ^&W^i 7^^i<iiw<4, a>tT!y'i|<o, fsiciiyy , c-^.^ u^' sn^i~tRW (Tpfg^) sn^i^T-fyiw 'Cl^H STT^T !fl*1iq> TCiiwofro aii^i ^iRit'pft^ iTWclf ^f ft^lr "^T^R ^siRraan^i Later on (20- 12-2004t s- Slul R. Daval SI^ilvastava, couilsel for llie appellants. 8hri Sudhlr Agrawal Shri I.S. Sahu, coun|sel for the complainants. Shri Shrivastava, appellants submitted-.thjat between the parties the matter was compromised 19-10-2004 and the comp the appeUants No. 1 to 4 rclatcs to hun stands abal So far as appellant^ who are prgsent toda;/ bef it is subuiitted Uial tlie npon these appellants a| Pandl Lawycr for fhc State, leamed counsel for fhe bn the lastdate ofhearing i.e. t-omise has been effeGted upon ps 7 and the complainants. So far as appellant No.5 Parip.eshi is concemed, the appeal :cd since he is no m.ore. No. 6 Gandtiu and 8 Kadhe, bre this Court, are concemed, ^ompromise Iias beeii effecled so and they he permitted to coinpound thc offcncc. The prayer is not OFjposed by the other sides. AppeUants No. 6 4nd 8 are identi&ed by their counsel. Counsel undertake^ to flle the photographs of the ! appellants No. 6 and 8. -1- SII^t'iRI fS'lfe '^T^Ti^T s»i^i<ft Gowri '^oEf "4|.l1|M<1, 0fll<-l'l<o, rs(C'll<-flj,< . G-f.^- ^^^ *(S^<i1i %*11fl» •^.200 311^1 TR^ ('^3^1; 'S'RIIW ^fe sii^r ^ _^, Having coneidered thje llie case aiid ui view of tlt Court. rendRrccl in the casel State ofM.P. rcportcd in stands allowed, Accordingly, the orde|r dated 24th May,_ 1997 No. 115/92 in respect of a^ aside and fhe appeUants of the charges leveUed agat<] Certified-copy as per •IT of conviction and sentence Ipassed in Scsslons Trial .t>pellants No. 6 and 8 is set >.6 and 8 are also acquitted Nb ;attist «bW(ri<il'ltillcif'?iv6 <Rn«;i< ^raifOTSll^T facte and circumetancee of ic judguieiil of Hou'ble Apex nfKantohal emd Others Vs. 'SOOO^ 9 SCC 61, thc appcal 'ules. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge Gi.PRJ—FS/350—12/2000—50,000. l^ .< [^^^' '^^