2708crn785.09.odt 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 785 OF 2009 Pramod Radheshyam Agrawal & 11 others vs. Ashok Shyamsundar Zhunzhunwala & another -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. SA Mohta, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. DM Kale, APP for the respondent-State. None for respondent No.1. CORAM:- R. Y. GANOO, J. DATED :- 27TH AUGUST, 2009. 1. Heard Mr. Mohta, learned Advocate for the applicant on the question of correctness of order dated 15/12/2008 passed in Criminal Revision No. 112 of 2008 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon as regards not granting permanent exemption. 2. After having considered the entire record, the impugned order itself is self speaking and in a way suggestion is given to the learned Magistrate attending the case that he should be liberal in seeking presence of accused persons on each and every date. If this is the view expressed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, I do not see any reason to say more than what he has stated. Hence, there is no need to interfere in the impugned order. The application is required to be dismissed at the stage of admission. 3. Application stands dismissed. wwl JUDGE