IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL STAY APPLICATION NO. 3801 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 476 OF 2008 Sri Sanjay Bansal ……Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & two others ……..Respondents Dated: 25 th June, 2008 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Tanuj Semwal, learned AGA for the State/respondent nos. 1 & 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of the First Information Report dated 28.05.2008, relating to the offence punishable under Section 135 of Electricity Act, 2003, which is registered as Crime No. 91/2008 with the Police Station Dalanwala, District Dehradun. Having heard the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA and after going through the contents of First Information Report and the receipts of payment of penalty to the tune of Rs. 2,52,101/- by the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the investigation and think it just and proper to observe that the bail application of the petitioner may be heard and disposed of expeditiously. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that if the petitioner-Sanjay Bansal is arrested or surrenders before the court concerned, his bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonably delay by the court concerned. (Stay Application No. 3801/2008 is also dismissed. (Dharam Veer, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 25.06.2008 Arti