IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 340 OF 2009 Between : 1. Darla Eswaramma 2. Darla Mounika ....Petitioners/ Respondents A N D 1. D.Lakshmi …Respondent (proposed 4th respondent) 2. Sayyed Nazeer Basha 3. R.Srinivasulu. 4. National Insurance Company Ltd., …Respondents/ Responents. THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 340 OF 2009 O R D E R: The Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the docket order, dated 24-10-2008 passed in I.A. No.2091 of 2008 in M.O.P.No.3 of 2008 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-Principal District Judge, Vizianagaram District. 2. The grievance of the petitioners herein is that the first respondent herein was impleaded as third petitioner in the M.O.P. before the trial court, but as she claimed to be the second wife of the deceased petitioner, she is not entitled to any compensation. 3. That issue has to be decided in the main O.P. by the trial Court. But, in view of the fact that the petitioners herein have not impleaded her as a party in the M.O.P., the trial court on application rightly allowed the first respondent to come on record as fourth respondent in the M.O.P. Whether the proposed party is entitled for compensation has to be decided in main petition. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed confirming the order of claims tribunal dated. 24.10.2008. No costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU. J February 23, 2010. YVL