RSA 2361 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. RSA 2361 of 2010 Date of decision:16.2.2011 Palwinder Singh Petitioner vs. Dhir Singh and others Respondent Present: Mr. PS Rana, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. The suit of the plaintiff- appellant for declaration that he is owner in possession to the extent of 1/8th share in the land measuring 16 kanal 18 marla, mentioned in the heading of the plaint, besides claiming that the sale deed dated 25.2.1992, executed in faovur of defendant No.1 was illegal, null and void as a result of misrepresentation, stands dismissed by the courts below. The said sale deed dated 25.2.1992 was allegedly executed by Surjit Singh, Gurmit Singh, Palwinder Singh sons of Sohan Singh and Inderjit Kaur, Sawinderjit Kaur and Pritam Kaur, daughters and widow, respectively of Sohan Singh. Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that the courts below have ignored the fact that vide document Ex.P 2 death of Gurmit Singh has been established to be on 7.10.1975 making the sale deed null and void. I have considered the arguments of counsel for the appellant. The contention of the plaintiff has been considered by the courts below by observing that the above said Gurmit Singh has been established to be alive in the year 1994 and that the pleading to the effect that Gurmit Singh RSA 2361 of 2010 2 had died in the year 1975 has been found to be wrong. After hearing learned counsel for the appellant at length, I am of the opinion that the authenticity of document Ex.P2 has been considered and the said document in context to the other circumstances, stands falsified. No ground is made out for interfering in the concurrent finding of fact arrived at by the courts below. No substantial question of law being involved, the appeal is dismissed. February 16 ,2011 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE