1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.285 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5035 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.V.N. Upadhye Advocate for Appellant. .... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 21ST OCTOBER, 2010. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Appellant. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that Rule was issued in the Writ Petition and status quo was directed to be maintained in respect of contemplated enquiry. The counsel submits that the enquiry was being held on the same charges which were levelled against the Respondent employee earlier, as under the orders of the Lower Courts, the earlier 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders enquiry proceedings were set aside on the ground that full-fledged enquiry was not conducted. In the submissions of the counsel, the Appellant employer was entitled to hold fresh enquiry. 3. We have perused the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.5035 of 2010, dated 29th July, 2010. The learned Single Judge has issued Rule in the Petition and the Writ Petition is posted for final hearing in the month of February, 2011. In exercise of our jurisdiction under Letters Patent Appeal, no interference is warranted. Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. [K.K. TATED,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] asb/OCT10/lpa285.10