IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7437 of 2009 1. JAI KISHORE RAM, Son of late Mangal Ram, resident of Rampurba Tola Chapariya, P.S.- Mainatand, District- West Champaran. 2. Jai Prakash Sah, Son of Satya Narayan Sah, resident of Village- Pakuhva, P.S. Mainatand, District- West Champaran. 3. Sanjay Kumar, Son of late Shivchandra Tiwari Dipak, resident of Village- Bankatwa, P.S.- Jitana, District- East Champaran. 4. Hasan Imam Ansari, Son of Sri Serajul Hoda, resident of Village- Chuhari, P.S.- Chanpatia, District- West Champaran. 5. Anil Kumar, S/o- Jikh Ram, Resident of Village- Jamalpur, P.S.- Kupyana, District- Kaimur :--- Petitioners. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. District Magistrate, Patna. 5. Bihar Public Service Commission, through its Secretary, Bailey Road, Patna ;----- Respondents. ----------- For the petitioners :- Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate. For the State :- Nityanand Mishra, A.C. to S.C.-13. For the B.P.S.C.:- Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate. ====== 2. 03.07.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners were applicant pursuant to Advertisement No.17/98 issued by the Bihar Public Service Commission, Patna (hereinafter referred to as the “Commission”). They were appointed on the post of Assistant in the Collectorate, West Champaran at Bettiah on 23.01.2004. They have filed this writ application for a direction to the State-respondents to consider their case for grant of revised pay-scale of Rs. 4000-6000/-, as according to them other similarly situate persons had approached this Court in C.W.J.C. No.13577 of 2006 for similar relief, which was allowed under orders dated 17.12.2007, Annexure-6 to this application, against which the State-respondents preferred L.P.A. No. 522 of 2008, which was dismissed under order dated 29.09.2008. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that their case - 2 - is also covered by the aforesaid two orders dated 17.12.2007 (Annexure-6) and 29.09.2008. 4. Raising the aforesaid grievance, let the petitioners file representation before the District Magistrate concerned, who should consider and dispose of the same in the light of the aforesaid two orders dated 17.12.2007 (Annexure-6) and 29.09.2008 by passing appropriate reasoned order in accordance with law as early as possible, in any case within a period of two months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. In the event, representation is allowed, it goes without saying that petitioners be allowed the consequential benefit. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)