IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-16760 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 16.8.2011 Kuljeet Kaur ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Mr.Karam Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Sandeep Mann, Sr.DAG, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.Chanan Singh, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 6. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. This is a petition filed by an aggrieved wife against the private respondents, who are her in-laws, alleging that she is being threatened and harassed by them. Learned counsel for respondents No.4 to 6 states that in fact it is a case of matrimonial dispute where the petitioner herself has registered an FIR against them and qua which they are facing the proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. He further states that they never threatened the petitioner nor harassed her after she started residing separately. Further contends that there are two minor children from the wife who are being taken care of by them. Crl.Misc.No.M-16760 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Learned counsel for the State points out that the trial pursuant to the FIR initiated by the petitioner is in progress. Having regard to the aforesaid facts in the totality, I am of the opinion that the prayer of the petitioner cannot be granted. She, however, is at liberty to approach the trial court in case she apprehends any danger to her life and liberty during the course when she is required to testify before the said court. Disposed of with the liberty aforesaid granted. 16.8.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss