WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTK ‘LE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA W mqi$ F1 200 W21 W5 (1W) mmmanésT WWWI¥WW§R aiarawanéer r WJ’. i222} No.6440l2008 ?ETITIONER Sarita L31, Daughter of Late Shn' Samida Lal APPELLANT Gond, aged about 27 yeaxs, resident of ViJlage Mauhadih, posted at Government Higher Secondary School, Birra, Tehsil Champa, Distn‘ct Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh, as Panchayat Shiksha Kanni Grade‘lll Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Director of Panchayat, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipux, Chhattisgarh 2. Netram Kashyap, son of Shri Anantram Kashy‘ p, age not known to the appellant, reside t of village Birra, Tehsil Champa, District Janjg' Champa, Chhattisgarh 3. Rohan Lal Kashyap, son of not known to the appellant, previous Sarpaneh, Gram Panchayat Bixra, ‘I‘ehsil Champa, Disirict Janjgir—Champa, Chhatidsgarh 4. Tijaurem Patel, son of not known to the appellant, presently posted as ‘ Sarpanch, District Janjgir Champa, Chhatn'sgarh 5. Santram, son of Shn' Ramlal Kumi, resident of village Birra, Tehsii Champa, Disnict Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh, posted as Panchayat Shiksha Karmi Grade-III 6. Collector, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh 7. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh WHIV$ ; m §q11$ l... qqzoo Wm W (WE) mmw mast " % mmm£fwm¥ aiwmet SB: HON. SHRI DHIRENDRA 19- 1 1-2008 Shri Sanjay Ku. Agrawa Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. ( Heard. The patitioner was ap; ’ointcd as Shiksha Kmmi Grade-III vide order of Annexure P—2, dated 15.9.2003. Her appointment was ‘: No.2 before the Chief Executive Officer, pa. The matter was enquired into by the me) Champa, who submitted his report e P~5. The Additional Collector, Janjgir— ure P—6 dated 24.7.2008, on the basis of Odicer, set aside the appointment of the at the same has been passed Without. ;cribed for such appointment and also >a'nch from contesting for a period of six appeal before the Director Panchayat, 3r of Additional Collector and in the said ion for staying the effect and operation of tor. However, the Director Panchayat vide re, P-l dated 14.10.2008, rejected the tr STay. Learned counsel for tl matter, on the same facts, execution of the order of tht MISHRA, J 1, coun$el for the p€titionen Erovt. Advocate for the State; cHallenged by the responden‘ Jila Panchayat Janjgir—Cham Sub Divisional Omcer (Revel dated 8.82005 vide Annexm‘ Champa, vide order of Annex report of the Sub Divisional yetitionei‘ on the ground tt following the procedum pre: debarxed the concerned Sag years. The petitioner filed Chhattisgarh against the 0rd appeal; ehe also tiled applicat the order of Additional Collec impugned order of Annexu application of the petitioner fc .e petitioner submits that in the similar the Director Panchayat had stayed the 3 Additional Collector at the instance of WW,W;W W'- mq-i-m x .V m 200 311%21 wm Han WQI Min mmwma ’3', . mmwmm aiwma appellant-Santram Kashyap Howcver, in this matter, the bcen rcjected. ’ i have heard learned co After gaing through the Director Pmchayat, after con petitioner'in this regard, distjj the momh of July 2008 and rejected vide order dated 14. the considered opinion of th] the instant petition is dispc Pan‘chayat, Chhattisgarh to ‘ petitioner Within a period receipt] production of co?y of vide annexure P-8 dated 148.2008. application of the petitioner for stay has tinsel for the petitioner. impugned order, it is observed that the sidering the arguments advanced by the iguished the case of Santram on facts. Since, the appointment. of the petitioner has been cancelled in l‘her application for stay has already been 10.2008 by the Competent Authority, in s Court, ends of justice will be served if sed of with a direction to the Director iecide the appeal itself preferred by. the of three months mm the date of Sdk Dhirendra Mishra this order. Judge anew w (W)