@Mghm Emma @ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT ?ETITION (Habeas Corpus) No.$2 g 1201 1 PETITIONER / Smt. Saroj Kaiwartya W/o Shri Shri Pradeep Kumar Kaiwartya, aged about 39 years, R/o Village Manoura D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) /2. Inspector General of Police District Bilaspur (C.G.) Superintendent of Police District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Station House Officer Police Station Marwahi, District fy‘ Bilaspur (C. G.) QXwh gN WM) s$1 . ”l” " Post Matahi, at present Village Ghardehi Block Patharia, ‘?;:i:fii;ij:.;: Tehsil Mungeli District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS / l. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Ministry of Home C? /5. Uttam alias Vinay Sharma S/o Shri Nandu alias Suneel Sharma, aged not known R/o Dabarapara, Kota District Bilaspur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF 'INDIA Oy‘Z HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR D.B.: Hon’ble Shri Justice Satish K. Aqnihotri and Hon’ble Shri Justice Radhe Shyam Sharma Writ Petition (H.C.) No.838 of 2011 Petitioner Smt. Saroj Kaiwartya VerSUS Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others Present: Shri Rahul Jha, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Government Advocate for the State/respondents No.1 to 4. x Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ORAL ORDER (Passed on 27‘“ June, 201 1) Per Satish K. Aqnihotri, J.: Heard. 2. By the instant petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to produce her minor daughter, namety, Ku. Preeti Kaiwartya, aged about 14 years from the illegal detention of respondent No.5 and further to expedite the investigation in the l case. 3. Shri SUmesh Bajaj, learned Government Advocate appearing ,for the State/respondents No.1 to 4 submits that a challan after investigation has been filed before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Marwahi, District Bilaspur on 1—4—2011 (Annexure D-1). The Magistrate, after having taken cognizance of the matter, had issued a permanent warrant against respondent No.5 on 2-5~201 1. 2 w 4. Shri Rahul Jha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has obtained several other informations, which have not been iooked into by the investigating agency. 5. Be that as it may, since the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Marwahi has taken cognizance of the matter, liberty is, reserved to the petitioner to produce all the informations whatever she has in her possession before the Magistrate so that same can be taken into consideration for appropriate action. Gopal in view bf foregoing, “WW .....W . t Sd/— Sd/' Sa t'lsh K.Agnihotr‘ ‘ “ I Radhe Shyam Sharma Judge ._ ,,, Judge