^ -4.; MI^ COURTaB!C»CTTIS6ARH AT BIUa'UK Misc.aAiobeal No.1238 of 2005 COftAM: Hon'bte Shri .g.ft. >'ok,^3 &. Hon'ble Shi-i Cilip Raosalieb Deshmukh, J. Appellont L Radliesh'yam, aged about 28 ypurs.son of W Poiu^ ^f!^. residefrt pf village- ; »Serriar|«:)na[%Police Station Kunda, Tahsil ^ ; Panclarjya, &istrict-Kabirclham (Kawardlia)'Chhattisgarh "i'" -Vei*sus-F:i'3'. ^ ; '-" ''•1- ' ' . ReSDondents Non-applicants gl^ .fi||py(ujndc, son of Ghaitram 5onwani, Fig^iscs^-'Sdtnami, aged about 36 years, ^S^ nEgaclent' of village-Mongalt, Police StttttOii-Kukdur, Distt. Kabirdham •'^ (Chhattisigarh) - : ;;; ,';'.::: 2. 5mt. SuldTam Bai, wifesf Shri Anjordas, resident of villoge Bandhawapana, Tah.- Lot-mi; bistrict-Bilaspur (C.&) ^ ; ^ 3. The New^ India Insuroa'ice Connpdny Limited.^Rajendra Nagar Ghowk. Link Rood, BiElaspur, Oisft-. Bilaspur <C6) Shri S.P.Kurre, Counsel fortheQJipisllanl'. QRALGftDER 1; (Passe^on 9thJonuar'y^OQ6) Tbe followin9 oral^ order of; •I'liifciCourt uwas pas^d by DILIP RAQSAHEB bESHMUKH^j. 4^ yV;g% - _ 1. The dnly question^eanydissecl ||e'f6re us in this Misc. Appeal'is that tha<Sompensation awup3ed By tlief'Tribunal iS ^n the lower side. 2. Leamed counsel for the oypellBBTt ycieSSno^clispute that the in^red neither sustained'ariy diaibUi^ nor <^ injuriesAasixijned by l^hesHyam in the^^^^^^^^ were simple il'ijuries. THe lau-ined "Ft-iiaurial 1'ias •laken intp cohs deratiori the above -2-- '.fw".:. ~ 2-' '~~<v e ^viiftnt fwt <md has a^l^ecl a compensdtion of Rs.5/472/- which incluctes Rs.l.,QCW- towards pain dncl suffer-ing, Rs.3000/- towards.of loss of ear-ning, RsJOOO/- towards fogd clui'irig?hpspitalization and Rs472/- townrds medical expen%s.,We find no infirmi'ty in the compensation aw»rl!eclbytheTfiburial. i ' This appeal is wjltloyt substdnce <md is dismissed. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd<- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge B'i !SE !s::^^y. W:!