IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 735 of 2009 Between: 1 Sara Ravinder @ Baalerao Ravinder S/o.Late Sara Chandraiah @ Balerao Chandraiah R/o.1-2-693/10, Neredmet, Malkajgiri Mandal Ranga Reddy District 2 Smt.Sara Anasuya @ Balerao Anasuya W/o.Late Sara Chandraiah @ Balerao Chandraiah R/o.1-2-693/10, Neredmet, Malkajgiri Mandal Ranga Reddy District 3 Smt.L.Umavathi W/o.L.Narsing Rao R/o.4-2-190, Old Boiguda, Secunderabad 4 Smt.U.Prabhavathi W/o.U.Narsing Rao R/o.3-41, Golnaka,Amberpet, Hyderabad all the petitoners rep.by their Agreement of sale -cum-GPA Holder V.Srinivasa Reddy, S/o.Late V.Ramana Reddy, aged about 41 years,R/o.H.no.8-4-544/74/44, Sanjay nagar ,Erragadda, Hy ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Nizampet Gram panchayat, Nizampet, Nizampet village Qutbullapur Mandal,Ranga Reddy District rep.by its Executive officer 2 The Sarpanch, Nizampet Gram panchayat, Nizampet Nizampet Village, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in trying to lay the road in the petitioners land i.e. land in Sy.No.101 of Nizampet village, Quthbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District admeasuring an extent of Ac.2.36 guntas without initiating the proceedings under Land Acquisition Act as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.O.MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: G.ELISHA( SC FOR ZPPS AND MPPS,TEL REG) The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioners claim to be the absolute owners and possessors of the land admeasuring Ac.2.36 guntas in Sy.No.101 of Nizampet Village, Quthbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. They filed this writ petition stating that on 20.1.2009 the respondents came to their land and tried to lay a road. This Court on 22.1.2009, while issuing notice before admission directed that the respondents shall not lay the road across the land of the petitioners. Today, when the matter is taken up, the learned standing counsel for the respondent Gram Panchayat submitted that the writ petition was filed only on mere apprehension and that there is no proposal to acquire the land of the petitioners for laying the road. The above said statement of the learned standing counsel is recorded and the writ petition is accordingly closed. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.11.6.2009 msv