IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.DENESAN THURSDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2007 / 21ST PAUSHA 1928 WP(C).No. 1289 of 2007(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ RAJU, S/O.CHERIAN, (RETIRED OVERSEER, K.S.E.B.), MATTATHIL HOUSE, MALLOUSSERY P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN SRI.T.R.JAGADEESH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SC SHRI. K.S.ANIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.K.DENESAN, J. ----------------------------- WP(C)No.1289 OF 2007 ----------------------------- Dated this the 11th January, 2007. JUDGMENT The petitioner retired from service while working as Overseer in the Kerala State Electricity Board. It is contended that he has got CLR service also to his credit and though the CLR service ought to have been reckoned as qualifying service for pension, the same was omitted. Ext.P7 representation filed by the petitioner before the third respondent is pending consideration. 2. Legal Liaison Officer submits that appropriate decision will be taken on Ext.P7 as expeditiously as possible. 3. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to consider Ext.P7 and pass orders within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. If the CLR service is found reckonable for pensionary benefits, the amount due to the petitioner shall be worked out and the monetary benefits paid to him without delay. K.K.DENESAN Judge jj