mK- <ji-' (Lf-v vo IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.No.........^.£..5i........./200^ PETITIONER: / ..--^ ^l-'\^---'' ••' ^ '^'..-' Pitamber Patel S/o Shri Manohar Patel, Aged 35 year's Working as L.D.T. (Tribal Department) at Govt. Kanya School, Kotba, R/0 Kotba, Tahsil - Pathalgaon, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) -•ivT' .-;&'" VERSUS RESPONDENTS t ^'uT'? ^s^^y^ !-*«. v^- ^ ^^%<,\\ ^"^f li ^ is^s^...^^ i '::. lt^3'^?^.y '"^ilS^A^ ^L^"<J^..- ^ ^-' .~..-^^~ '-'1^;^"°^7^^'" ^' 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ^2. Cominissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Pt.Ravishankar University campus, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Asst. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Departinent Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) ^ PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/327 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIQRARL^TC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER OF UKE NTURE ETC :- 0'',.y 1 XI-HC-78 sn^rm^iw (W 311^1 *t)i* W*l<»rT9i*TTq» a^'^ipncra', oTnwis, ^svfW Co^-f^) ^.^^^/s'7^ 200 sn^yr >iaci (yiI^'sii^T) WtiTm(if?a'an^r 19.1.2007 Mr. R.S.Patel, Mr. Ravl Maheshwari, Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, courtset Mr. Sushll Dubey, <3ovemi<ientAdvocate Gupta, Deputy Govemmen|t Advocate forthe State/respondents. llll Wrth the consentof toarnetl matter is heard flnally and dispos^d Common orderdictated ii|i open Court, passed separately. A copy ofthis order be pla|c®don tt>e record of the conrwcted writ peUtions. «hi<itM<fl-i*ii*«'iT^'fetA'<Ri*<ii< ^3)1^311^ hwari, Mr. Rahuj Jha and for the petltioner(s). anttMr.Sartish counsal appearkigfor the parttos, the lof. Wrtt PeUtion (S.) No.262 of 2007 in Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge P.T.O. ^< •J^ <v '-ff; k HISH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BU-^SPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'HLE MR. ^TISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. Petitioners WRIT PETITION (S.t N0^82 OF 2007 Sundw LalPatel and anottier versus Respondents : State <rf Chhattl^arh and ottiers PeUtioner WRIT PETmON (S.) N0.263 OF 2B87 Puna Ram Sahu versus Respondents : State Govfc of CWtatttegaihandoUiers PeSBoner WRff PETITION (S.l N0.264 OF 2007 Ranr Kunar Satame vereus Resoondents : State Oovt. ofGhhatfegarti andothas WRIT PETmON (S.i NO^eSOF 28W Petitioner : Hemant KumarSalam» Versus Respondents : StateQovt.ofChhattl^arftandoUiers PetJtioner wrar PETITIQIN (s.i NO^BS opzooy Budhnath Sa! Paikra versus Reseondents : Starte of ChhErtfegarttand ottiera wrar pETmoN <s.i NO^S? OF 2007 <L PetiUoner : Madan Lal Sahu -/- versus Respondents : StateofChhaUtegaittandothere Petifoner WRIT PETITION (S.1 N0^89 OF 2«>7 PHamberPatel versus Resoondents : aatetrfChhattisgaitiandrthers Petitioner WRIT PETmON(S.)NO^yOQF 2007 Trinsrth Gtraud»ary versus Respondents : StBtetrfGhhattisgsBhanAothers r Priitioner WRITPETITION (S.t IW.281 OF 2W7 Snrt. DeepU ^irawal veraus ResDondents : StateorChliatBsgarhMidothere Present : Mr. R.S-Patd, Mr. Ravl Maheshwari, h4r. Rahul Jha and Mr. Rajendra Tripathl, counsel for the petitioner(9). Mr. Sushil Dubey, Government A^ocate and Mr. Satish Gupta, Deputy Govemment Advocate forthe State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 19th Day of January, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for »iepariias joinBy suhmit thatthe facts and quesfion <rf law involved in the prssent b^h of writ petiUons are squarely covered by the decision ofthisCourtinthe casa of Yashwant Kumar Bhsrwhwrf vs. 1unfc<M( Cnfporattofl, Dy»ar toHi anoithei'. 2. In subsequent cases, is., Writ PetiUan (S.) hto.4130of 2005 (Sopesft KumarVwma v8. The State Sovt of efcftafffagw* aml anottiw) and other connected matters, ctecided by this Court en 15-12-2006, pursuant to tha meino dated SB-1-1995, issued by the Secretaty, Board of Secondary Educafion, Bhopal andlfte prospeclus aS DiplCTna in Education Examlnatian, it was clarified that ttie nomenclatureof the Basic Training InsUtute, i.e., B.T.I. has been 1 4 changpd and renamal as Diptcwna in Educallon, l.e., Dfd. Accordingty, the D.Ed. eertificate hoktBis are atse coverect by ttr decision in Writ Petitfon (S.) lsto.4130 of 2tX®(Goipesft KumarVwma vs. The Sfefe GoW. ofChhattsgwh aocfanoftei) (Supra). 3. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitians are disposed of in terms <rf ttie declsion of this Court f»the matter <rf Yashwait KiimarBhaiwfwa^ (Supra), subject to verification of Ure firet as to whether the peBtioners have acqulred B.EdJB.T.t./D.Ed. CerBficates at Iheirown expenses as per ths ciroularsdatad 24-12- 1998 and 1-3-1999 and further vi*iether they hava been p»ld tffo adwsawe increments or not. No ordw as to costs. Oopal 4. A copy of this order be ptaced en ttie record of the connected writpetiUons. _^_———--— — Sd/- SarishK. Agnihotn Judge 1 2006(11)MPJR-GS96 1