^ c ,F.^U& ;N€H IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR [C.G.J WRIT PETITION N0. S3~7^~^_/2QWi PETITIONERS / '•^>y 1. Mohan Singfa S/o Harawan Singh Aged-about 35 years, Chairman, Janpad Panchayat, Ramchandra F'ur, Distt.- Sarguja [C.G.] 2. Khatiza Beguin W/o Abdul Kuddus Aged- about 55 years, President, Woman Health and Child WeUare Society, Janpad Panchayat, Ramchandra Pur, Distt.- Sarguja [C.G.j VERSUS RESPONDENTS / ^!^S\ >J !^t.^ ^^ l.State of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretaiy Woman and Child Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur [C.G.] 2-The Commissioner Sanchanaalaya, Woman and Child welfare Department, Mantralaya Parisar, Old Niirses Hostel Bhawan Raipur [C.G.] S.Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Ambikapur [C.G.] 4. Collector, fWoman and child development department) Sarguja, Distt- Sarguaja [C.G.] 5. District Program officer, Woman and Child development Department, Ambikapur [C.G.] 6. Chief Executive OfEcer Zila Panchayat, Sarguja, Distt.- Sarguja [C.G] 7. Chfef Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Ramchandra Pur, Distt.- Sarguja [C.G] , 8. Project.OfBcer Integrated Woman and ChUd Development Department, Ramchandra Pur [C.G.] WRIT PETITION UNDER.ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FORJSSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT. ORDER OR DIRECTIONS ^^ iia i-- XI-HC-78 *1I*1rtl SSHT^l T^ "'ll^lcl'il, ®Tfiyi<»,!c|<'tl+iy< ...W.i'.^.^.'^nWi; 200 3IT^T4ach (lyi^sjt^ET) 3:&<W«nTR.fi<ti cTOT 3f]^r gilTR; ^<ITW?rf?(T3IT^r U.8.2006:- couilisel ahd respe^tively t|y Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Shri N.K. Agrawal, Deputy advance copy. Heard both the counsel. The petitioners, who are Ch^ the President, Woman Health, Panchayat, Ramchandrapur, and their main grievance is that| Karyakartas are to be selected seiection, iist is being forwarded appointment orders are being jj However, in this case, the selectioi|i issuance of the order respondent N( aliowing the Janpad Panchayat to p^ In para 5.9 of the petition, Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, ^i matter and thatis why he is not re( order. in the circumstances, leamecf that the petitioners may be allow^d Collector, respondent No.4 and in decide the same, and a direction process be completed in accordan^e for the State has no objection. Having heard learned couns^l facts and circumstances of the cas^ forthepetitioners. l^dvocate General for the State, on ?>raf?PftT Wqcff ff teA rf5RCT( ^srf^Tsn^r ^irman of the Janpad Panchayat and Child Welfare Society, Janpad i, have preferred this writ petition as per the scheme Aangan Badi the Gram Panchayat. After the |to the Janpad Panchayat and the i^sued by the Janpad Panchayat; process was completed and before lt>.6 calied for the record and he is not frss order. it has been alleged that the Chief iurguja is personally interested in the (urning the record for issuance of the counse! for the petitioners submitted to make a representation to the ^urn, respondent No.4 be directed to (nay also be given that the selection with iaw, to which learned counsel for the parties, having regard to the and without expressing any opinion P.T.O. BJi ^.l^ Btrl'^'i Kl S!S I'^i^ ?.]®^ XI-HC-78 'ssf ^iiAiirtii, eixny'Kc, Roi'My <m<'n sb^ith ^200 3TT^T4ach (yt^q.ff) 3n^ri;?i'teR' gW3IR5Tsbt<|tt) Barve 5T(TTW:nf?tT3;n^T ^- on the merit of the case, the representation along with a copy tum, respondent No.4 shall decidq from the date of receipt of the points raised by the petitioners, \t\ directed that the selection process With the direction aforesaid, Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.] stand disposed of. Parties are entitled for petiti|oners are allowed to make a detailed oflthis petition to respondent No.4 and in the same within a period of 30 days r^presentation, after examining all the accordance with law. He is further ^e completed in accordance with law.; |:he petition stands disposed of. ..to92/2006 and I.A. No.7488/2006 also certifi^d copy of this order. +i'i|f<vi41-f ^ii!"iTiffWt<Ri«i< ^TSll^ITSn^T Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O. f~ K Bi