IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition(S) No. 4320 of 2008 Sint. Kiraa I^ahapatra, W/o Shri Sanjay Mahapatra, Aged about 32 years, Presently worldng and posted asAssistant Grade-III, Directorate of Employees State Insuraace Sendces, Raipzir, R/o 472, New Rajendra Nagar, Janta Colony, Raipur, District Raipur(C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, TIirough its Secretaiy, Departaient of Labour, Maatralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.). Directoiate of Einployees State Insuiaace Services, Raipur, through its In-chai^e Director, p-290/5, T^orc nagar, Raipiu- (C.G.) WRfT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 QFTHE CONSTJTUTIQNOF_tNDIA (SB: HonTale ShriSatishK. AgnihotdJ.) Shri AshishShrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Pauel Lawyer for the respondent/State. 1. 2. OR_D_E_R (Passed ou tliis lltfa Day ofAugust, 2008) Wifh fhe consent of learaed coiinsel appearmg for the parties, fhe inatter is heard .flaally. Learaed couasel appearing for the petitioner subxnits ftiat pursuant to the orier dated 25.3.2008 passed ia Writ Petition (S) No. 1744 of 2008 (Ku, Shweta Mathews aad others Vs, State of Chhattisgarh aad aaother), tbe Director, fhe Einployees State Insurauce Services, has issufid a ndtice dated 21.7.2008 (Aaaexure P/l). AcGoiding to learued coiuisel appearing &r the petitiouer, the show cause notice is vague and does not specify aay particular iacident ofirregularity lor ^ 'Z. 4. ThEitaa illegaKty. Thus, the petitioner is not capable of replymg to £he show cause iiotice. Be tfaat as it may, on penisal pf fhe show cause notice, it appears ftiat the grievauce ofthe petitioner is correct Leanied coiiasel appearing for the respondent/State also does not fiiid proper requirexuent of the notice ia the impugned notice. In view, of that, this notice may not be treated as proper notice and the respondents are at liberty to issue a fesh notice giving fhe details of the aTegiiIarity and iUegaUly coaunitted ia the selection prqcess, in o.ider to eaable the petitioner to fito proper reply within areasonable period. Accordingly, tfae notice dated 21.7.2008 (Auitexure P/l) is quashed aud tfae petition is allowed to fhe above extent. Sd/- , Satishl&Agnihotn Judge