IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No. 128 of 2007 Raghunath Bhagat son of Jhingan Bhagat, resident of village Bhulwaria, P.O. Madhopur, District East Champaran……………………………Defendant-petitioner. Versus 1. Most. Gangiya W/o Late Virchand Bhagat, R/o village Bhulwaria, P.O. Madhopur, District East Champaran. 2. Daiju Prasad son of Bhola Prasad 3. Dular Prasad son of Late Gyanchand Bhagat 4. Jai Mangal Bhagat son of Late Bhudhan Bhagat 5. Dhanai Bhagat son of Gonaur Bhagat 6. Shankar Bhagat son of Gyanchand Bhagat All are residents of village Phulwaria, P.O. Madhopur, District East Champaran……………………...…Plaintiffs-Opposite Parties. . For the petitioner : Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opp.Parties : None. ----------- 03/ 01.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This civil revision has been filed by defendant-petitioner challenging order dated 14.11.2006 passed in Title Suit No.41 of 1996 by which the learned Munsif, Sikrahana, Motihari allowed the plaintiff’s petition and directed to take photograph of the concerned sale deeds for comparison of the thumb impression of Bacchu Bhagat. The aforesaid title suit was filed by plaintiffs-opposite party nos.1 to 6 for declaration of their title and for other ancillary reliefs and their claim was based on a registered sale deed dated 27.12.1982 said to have been executed by Bachhu Bhagat, which was marked as Ext.2/A. On the other hand, the defendant challenged the said sale deed and raised his claim on the basis of another sale 2 deed dated 05.03.1994 said to have been executed by the said Bacchu Bhagat, which had been challenged by the plaintiffs. Now by the impugned order the learned court below has allowed the plaintiffs to get the L.T.I. of Bacchu Bhagat on both the aforesaid sale deeds compared. This court does not find any illegality in the said order of the learned court below, because if the L.T.I. of Bacchu Bhagat on both the aforesaid deeds are found to be of the same person, there will be no doubt that both the deeds were executed by the same person and the matter could be decided easily. However, if the L.T.I. of Bacchu Bhagat on one deed differs from his L.T.I. on the other deed it would be incumbent upon the learned court below to get the L.T.I. of Bacchu Bhagat on both the sale deeds compared with the L.T.I. of Bacchu Bhagat admitted by both the parties because the sale deed produced by the plaintiffs is challenged by the defendant and the sale deed produced by the defendant is challenged by the plaintiffs. With the aforesaid directions/observations this civil revision is disposed of. harish/ ( S.N.Hussain, J)