IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 17TH JULY 2009 / 26TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 20176 of 2009(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SHEBIN KAREEM, S/O. C.M. ABDUL KAREEM, AGED 22 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHOOLOOKKARAN HOUSE, EDATHIRUNJI P.O., IRINJALAKKUDA, THRISSUR. 2. ASWATHI S,SARANG NCC WING, THAYINERY JUNCTION, PAYYANNUR P.O., KANNUR. 3. ASWATHI R, ASWATHY SS TEMPLE ROAD, NEAR AYODYA AUDITORIUM, PAYYANNUR P.O., KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN, SC, UNIVERSITY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.20176 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 17th July,2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioners, who have completed their Engineering Degree Course from a college affiliated to the University of Calicut, had written the 7th Semester Examination held in December 2008. Apparently, dissatisfied by the marks obtained in the examination, they had applied for revaluation. They are aggrieved that the results of the revaluation have not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the Examination held in December 2008. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioner in relation to the 7th Semester Examination held in December 2008, as W.P ( C) No.20176 of 2009 2 early as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the applications for revaluation are in order and otherwise correct. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.20176 of 2009 3 W.P ( C) No.20176 of 2009 4 (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.20176 of 2009 5 W.P ( C) No.20176 of 2009 6