IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13911 of 2011 SURENDRA KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 135 of the Electricity Act. The accusation is of committing theft of electricity. The loss has been calculated to the tune of Rs. 80950/-. The impugned order reflects that in paragraph no. 43 of the case diary it has been recorded that on enquiry from nearby people, the I.O. has come to know that the petitioner had taken the place in question two months prior to raid. In that view of the matter, let the petitioner deposit Rs. 40,000/- before the learned court below within a period of three months from today which will be invested in some Fixed Deposit Scheme which will be subject to final result of the case. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender 2 before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 293 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The bail of the petitioner will be provisionally accepted which will be confirmed by the learned court below on deposit of the aforesaid amount. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)