IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39650 of 2008 KARAMAT MIAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.09.2008 Heard. The FIR is u/s 147, 148,149 and 302 IPC against the petitioner and others. Asha Devi wife of deceased Tikait Bind alleged that the petitioner and other FIR named accused called the deceased from his house and took him away with them and thereafter the deceased did not come back and his dead body was found near the house of Sukat Mian and the informant learnt that the petitioner and other accused had killed the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after investigation, Police had submitted charge-sheet against other accused persons but the petitioner was not sent up by Police for trial and that the learned C.J.M., disagreeing with the Police Report, took cognizance of the offences against the petitioner also. Learned counsel says that there is nothing specific against the petitioner. Referring to Annexure-2, learned counsel points out that some other accused persons against whom charge-sheet was submitted have been allowed bail by the Sessions Judge and some of them were also allowed bail by this Court Mr. S.R.Haque does not point out any other material. Under the circumstances, petitioner Karamat Mian admitted to bail on his furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with - 2 - two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah in Sathi P.S.Case No. 142 of 2004. Jay/ (C.M.Prasad,J)