IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45158 of 2009 GUDDU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 21.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Considering the nature of the allegation under Section 392 for snatching of motorcycle, custody since 19.6.2009, antecedent of two cases pointed out by the State under Section 392 of the Penal Code, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 30,000/- (thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No. 24 of 2009. Both the sureties must be his mother and father respectively whose photographs and proof of residence shall be appended to the bail bonds to be verified through the local police before final acceptance and till which date the petitioner is directed to remain physically present on each date. If the petitioner is not duly 2 represented on a single date or absent on a date directed for his physical appearance, the Court below shall be at liberty to deal with him appropriately in accordance with law notwithstanding the present order. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)