CRM NO. M-36476 OF 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM NO. M-36476 OF 2010 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 22.12.2010 Parmod ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. Suneet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Gulati, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Ashwani Bura, Advocate. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) Parmod s/o Suresh has applied for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.239 dated 19.09.2010 under Sections 366/506/120-B IPC and 376 read with Section 34 IPC registered at Police Station Kharkhoda. As per allegations of the prosecution, the prosecutrix was subjected to rape by the petitioner. However, the petitioner has placed on record the marriage certificate, affidavit of the prosecutrix that she made statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C on 03.11.2010 that she does not want to proceed against the petitioner. So, it is a moot point whether the prosecutrix was subjected to rape by force or she voluntarily married the petitioner? CRM NO. M-36476 OF 2010 (O&M) -2- So, without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition stands accepted. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of SHO/Investigating Officer subject to the following conditions, as envisaged in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure : i) That the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation, as and when required; ii) That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and iii) That the petitioners shall not leave the country without prior permission of this Court. DECEMBER 22, 2010 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE