Crl. Misc. No.M-16674 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-16674 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 1, 2011 Jagdeep Singh @ Jaggi …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.H.S. Batth, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner is alleged to have inflicted a blow with water pump handle on the person of deceased Gurpreet Singh. Counsel for the petitioner submits that complainant- Paramjit Singh is a procured witness as is prima facie apparent from the delay of 2 days in lodging of FIR and complainant being injured was not medico legally examined. He has also submitted that on account of application Crl. Misc. No.M-16674 of 2011 [2] under Section 319 Cr.P.C. having been allowed summoning additional accused, the trial will be delayed as the charges have been re-framed and de novo trial has began. The petitioner is stated to be in custody for the last one year and seven months. I have taken into consideration all the arguments raised by the counsel for the petitioner. In view of the specific allegation against the petitioner of having inflicted blow with water pump handle on the person of the deceased, the probability of falsehood cannot be determined on the ground of delay in lodging the FIR; complainant having not been examined for his injuries by any doctor and statement of deceased having not been recorded despite the fact that he was discharged from PGI and later on died in Rajindra Hospital. No ground is made out for grant of concession of regular bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. However, the trial Court is directed to expeditiously record the statements of the witnesses and conclude the trial preferably within a period of six months after the receipt of a certified copy of this order. August 1, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE