: 1 : USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.599 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.872 OF 2004 Mahiboob Husain Mujawar .. Applicant V/s. Subhash Dadarao Dhanave & Ors. .. Respondents ..... Mr. M.A. Patil for the applicant Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad i/by A.M. Kulkarni for the respondent Nos.6A and 6B. ..... CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATE : 11TH JUNE, 2009. P.C. : 1. Heard learned advocates on both the sides.There is a delay of 291 days in filing the present Civil Application. Original respondent No.2 expired hence his heirs as 2(i) to 2(iii) are sought to be brought on record. They are absent, though served. Perused : 2 : paragraph 3 of the application. In the said application, an explanation is given as to how there has been a delay on the part of the appellants. Absence of persons to be joined as respondents clearly indicates that they are not serious in opposing the application. Hence, application can be granted. Hence, the following order. ORDER . The Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). There shall be no order as to costs. . Amendment to be carried out in the Appeal Memo within a period of two weeks from today. (R.Y. Ganoo, J.) : 3 :