IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 26218 of 1999 Between: G.Venkateshwarlu s/o.G.Ramappa R/o.H.No.2-157/18,Court Road Anantapur Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt. of A.P Rep.by its Secretary, Education Dept Secretariat Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Higher Education Govt.of A.P Nampally Hyderabad. 3 The Regional Joint Director of Higher Education Cuddapah Cuddapah Dist. 4 The Principal,Govt College for Men Anantapur Anantapur Dist. 5 The Commissioner,The Commissionerate of Collegiate Education,Govt. of A.P Gaganviharr Nampally Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to To issue an appropraite Writ,order or direction, preferably one in the nature of the Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to Orders in O.A.No.7482/98, dated 23-11-1998 of the A.P.Adminstrative Tribnal, Hyderabad, and quash the same as illegal,arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioners as a Lecturer in terms G.O.Ms.No.221, Education dated 26-6- 95 from the date of issuance of the said G.O., and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.GANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU Writ Petition No.26218 of 1999 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This writ petition is filed challenging the order dated 23-11- 1998 passed in O.A.No.7482 of 1998 on the file of Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad. 2. The petitioner was working as part-time Lecturer in the fourth respondent college. While so, the Government of Andhra Pradesh issued G.O.Ms.No.221, Education (CE.I-2) Department, dated 20-6-1995 laying down guidelines for regularising the services of eligible part-time Lecturers in various Government Degree and Junior Colleges. The petitioner claims that he is entitled to be regularised. In fact, the Tribunal after considering the rival contentions, directed the official respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of the said G.O. and G.O.Ms.No.212, Finance and Planning, dated 22-4-1994, and also keeping in view the rule of reservation. Thus, there is a positive direction to consider the case of the petitioner. In the circumstances, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. 3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J. ___________________ C.V.RAMULU, J. 17-07-2008 bsc