THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.25369 of 2010 DT.15.12.2010 Between: C.Sudhakar Reddy … Petitioner And The District Panchayat Officer, Ranga Reddy District at Lakdikapur, Hyderabad and others. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri N.Ravi Prasad Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2: AGP for Panchayat Raj Counsel for respondent No.3 : Sri P.Raghavendra Reddy The Court made the following ORDER: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.3 in according permission, dated 13.09.2010, to respondent Nos.4 to 7 for construction of compound wall and a room, without prior notice to the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary. A perusal of the averments contained in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition shows that there are civil disputes between the petitioner on the one side and respondent Nos.4 to 7 on the other. The petitioner has filed O.S.No.782 of 2007 in the Court of the learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, for partition of land admeasuring Acs.9.00, in which, respondent No.3 is also impleaded as a party. The purported cause, on which, the present writ petition is filed, is that respondent No.3 trespassed into the petitioner’s land in the guise of construction of community hall over Ac.0.10 guntas of land and has been intending to sell the same, without any authority, apart from granting permission to respondent Nos.4 to 7 for construction of house over the said Ac.0.10 guntas of land. In my opinion, in view of pendency of civil suit referred to above, to which respondent Nos.3 to 7 herein are parties, the petitioner is entitled to raise therein all the issues, which have been raised in this writ petition. This Court while exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not expected to go into the various disputed questions of fact involving rights over the property. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy in the pending civil suit. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.32408 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Date: 15.12.2010. VGB