£, c^ THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT APPEAL N0. /JG^ OF 2011 '^ ^ ^ APPBLLANTS/ RESPONDENTS 1. Guru Ghasidas University Bilaspur through Registrar, Bilaspur (Chhatdsgarh) 2. Examination Controller, Guru Ghasidas University Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONERS .^\ r^ ^p ^yy^ ~ ^•' .^ ^y ^ 51.^-^ Iffi ^\^>'"^7 ^?1 A If Renu Jaiswal, aged about 20 years, D/o Shri Suresh Jaiswal, student of B.A Part-II, R/o Ashok Nagar, Bilaspur Dist Bilaspi.ir (CG) 2. Rajkumari Banjare, aged About 20 years, D/o Late Ramhari Banjare, student of B.A Part-II, R/o Surya Vihar, Bilaspur (CG) 3..- Ragini Patel, D/o Sri Babu Lal Patel, aged about 20 years, student of B.A l^art-II, R/o Indira Vihar, Sar]<anda Bilaspur Dist Bilaspur (CG) 4. /' Jagriti Patanwar, D/o Shri Sharad Patanwar, aged about 20 years, student of BA Part-II R/o Krishna Vihai', Cliatidih Bilaspur Dist Bilaspi.ir (CG) 5. " Rashmi Kaushik, D/o Late Dhannuram ICaushik, aged 20 years, student of B A Part-II, R/o Eiasant Vihar, Bilaspi.ir Dist Bilaspur (CG) 6. Ambika Sahu, D/o Babulal Sahu, aged about 20 years Student of B A Part-II R/o Indira Vihar, Sarkanda Bilaspur Dist Bilaspi.Er (CG) 7. Kiran Sahu, aged about 20 Years, D/o Shri Ked^i.rnath Sahu, student: of BA Part-U R/o Indira Vihar, Balihari Chowk, Bilaspur (CG) «) •> 8. Indu Sahu, aged about 20 Years, D/o Shri Shantilal Sahu, student of BA Part-II R/o Vivekanand Colony Mopka, Bilaspur (CG) 9. Rashmi Jain, aged about 20 Years, D/o Shri Rajdeep Jain, student of B A Part-II R/o Kapil Nagar, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (CG) 10. Heeru Dhangar, aged about 20Yrs, D/o Shri Karmeshi Dhangar, student of BA Part-II Govt. Mata Sabari Naveen Kanya Mahavidyala}^a District Bilaspur (CG) 11. Seeta Uikey, aged about 20 Years, D/o Shri Bisaliu Uikey, studentof BA Part-II Govt. Mata Sabari Na.veen Kanya Mahavidyalaya District Bilaspur (CG) 12. Sanju Suryavanshi, aged about 20 Years, D/o Shri Ramadhar Suryavanshi, student of B A Part - II Govt. Mata Sabari Naveen Kaiiya Mahavidyalaya District Bilaspur (CG) 13. Kirti Sahu, aged about 20 Years, D/o Shri Shriram Sahu, student of BA Part-II Govt. Mata Sabari Naveen Kanya Mahavidyalaya District . Bilaspur (CG) 14. Aarti Sahu, aged about 20 Years, D/o Shri Ramkripal Sahu, student of BA Part-II Govt. Mata Sabari Naveen Kanya Mahavidyalaya District Bilaspur (CG) 15. Santoshi Patel, aged about 20 Yrs, D/o Chamar Singh Patel, studenf of BA Part-II Govt. Mata Sabari Naveen Kanya Mahavidycdaya District BUaspur (CG) 16. Rekha Patel, aged about20 Years, D/oShri LaJma.n Patel, student of B A Part' II Govt. Mata Sabari Naveen Kanya Mahavidyalaya District Bilaspur (CG) 17. Priti Yadav, aged about 20 Years, D/o Shri Ramadhar Yadav, student of BA Part-II Govt. Mata Sabari Naveen Kanya Mahavidycdaya District Bilaspur (CG) jlir' 8 ^:K^^^ ^> — '^%^ :A^ 11^^; ^o^ \<^^..^^/ "c$te^/ ^ 18. Manju Yadav, aged aboLit. 21 Yeaz's, D/o Shri Ra(:anlal Yadav, student of BA Part-II Govt. Mata Sabari Naveen Kanya Mahavidyalaya District Bilaspur (CG) 19. Chhaya Vishwakarma, aged About 21 Yea.rs, D/o Shri Maitu Vishwak-arma, stadent of B A Part-II, Government Mata Sabari Naveen I-CcU-iya Mahavidyalaya District Bilaspur (CG) 20. Pooja Mourya, aged about 21 Years, D/o Shri Mithlesh Mourya,student of F3A [>art-II Govt, Mata Sabari Naveen Kanya M.ah.avidya 1 aya District Bilaspur (CG) 21. Neelam Yadav, aged aboul2l Years, D/o Shri Lakhanlal Yadav, student of BA F'art-II Govt. Mata Sabari Naveen Kanya Mahavidyalaya District Bilaspur (CG) 22. Shalcuntala Suryavan shi, Aged about 21 YecU"s, D/o Shri Rajkumar, stude3it of B A Part-II, Government Mata Sabari Naveei-i PCanya MahavidyaJtaya, E3ilaspur (CG) 23. Sarita Chouhan, agccl about 21Years, D/o Shri Ramsaran Chouhan, student ofBA Part -II, Govt. Mata Sabari Naveen Kanya Mahavidyalyaj3ilaspur 24. Priti Baghel, ageclabout21 Years, D/o Shri Jawaharlal, student of BA Part-II, C/o Govt. Mata Sabari Naveen Kanya Mahavidyalya.Bilaspur 25. Bhagwati Yadav, aged a.bout 21 years, D/o Shri Tetku Ram Yadav, student of BA F>art-II, C/ Govt.Mata Sabari Naveen Kanya Mahavidyalya, Bilaspur 26. Sukriti Sarkar, aged a.1:)out 21 Years, D/o Sri Manoj I'-j..imcir Sarkar, student ofESA F'art.-III, R/o Songanga Colony, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, I:)istrict Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ^ J 27. Sushma Kaushik, aged about 21 years, D/ o Dhannuram Kaushik, student of B A Part- III, R/o Basa.nt. Vihar, Bilaspur Dist Bilaspur (CG) 28., State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secr'efcary, Higher Education Department, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 29. Shaskiya Mata Sabari Naveen Kanya Mahavidyalaya, Though Principal, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 30. Smt. Sunanda Maravi, Assistant Lecturer (Hindi Subject)Shaskiya Mata Sabai'i Naveen Kanya Mahavidya.laya, Through Principal, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2_(1) OF CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT APJPEAI^ TQDIVISIQN BENCH ACT, 2006 READ WITH RULE 158 (10) OF CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT RULES,2007. k 1 .^ J HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH^MLASPUR DB: HON*BLB I.M. QUDDUSI & HON*BLB G. MINHAJUDDIN, JJ, W.A.No.421/2011 Vs. RBSPONDENTS Lata Yadav aad others ItSWWIN^: l^ W.A.No.468/2011 Vs. W.A. No.449/2011 Vs. W.A.No.433/2011 Vs. WRIT APPEALS UNDER SECTION 2(11 OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPBAL TO DIVISIQN BBNCHI ACT. 2006 RBAD WITH RULE 158 110) OF CHHATTISGARH HIGH CQURT RULBS. 2007 APPELLANTS Gum Ghasidas Universityand anofher APPELLAS9TB Gum Ghasidas Universilyand aiiother RE8PONDBNT8 Renu Jaiswal and ofhiers APPBLLANTS Gum Ghasidas Universityaad aaother RESPONDBNTS Maya Dubey aad ofhers APPBLLANTS Guru Ghasidas Universityand another RESPONDBNTS Maaisha Gupta aad othera^ APPEARANCB: Mr. Ashish Shrivastava aiid Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, counsel for fhe appeUaats ia all fhe writ appeals. Mr. V.C. Ottalwar counsel for respondents 1 to 34 in W.A.421/2011, respondents 1 to 27 m W.A.468/2011, respondents 1 to 60 m W.A. 449/2011 and rcspondents 1 to 24 inW.A. 453/2011 Mr, Viaay Hadt, Deputy Advocate General for fhe State/ respondent no.35 ia W.A, 421/2011, respondent no,28 ia W.A.468/2011, respondent No.61 in W.A.449/2011 and respondent no.25 inW.A. 453/2011. Mr, P.S. Koshy, appears on behalf of Sunaada Maravi/ Respondent no.37 in W.A.421/2011, rcspondent no.30 in W.A.468/2011, Respondent no.63 in W.A.449/2011 & Respondent no.27 m W.A.453/1 1. Per I.M. OUDDUSI. J. ORALORDER (18.11.2011) 1. The above writ appeals have been filed agamst fhe common impugned order dated 08,08.2011 passed by fhe leamed Siagle Judge in W.P(C).Nos.l581, 1626, 1673 and 1580 of 2011 aUowiag the writ petitions, The learaed siagle Judge has held fhat the petitioners satisfied fhe basic requirements of attendaace; fhus tiiey shaU be treated as regular students for fhe examination wherein they had already appeared and fhe result of fhe said exainiaation shall be declared forthwith within a period ofone week fi-om today so fhat fhe petitioners could not be deprived ofadniission to furfher higher courses. 2. W.A. No.421/2011 rclates to W.P(C ).No.l581/2011 (Lata Yadav and others -vs- State); W.A.468/11 relates to W.P.(C ). 1626/11 (Renu Jaiswal and others -vs- State); W.A. 449/11 relates to W.P (C). 1673/2011 (Maya Dubey and others Vs. State) and W.A. 453/11 relates to W.P (C ). 1580/11 (Mamsh Oupta and others Vs. State). Siace fhese appeals iavolve smular facts and question of law, fhey are being disposed of by fhis coinnion order. 3. AppUcation has beeu filed ia each writ appeal on behalf of fhe respondent-stadents who were petitioners iii fhe writ petitions prayiag that the appeUaats/Universily herem.be directed to declare thej4? results of fheir respective courses ie,, B.A,, /B.Com., /B.C.A., (Part-I, Part-II aad Part-III) in the interest of justice, However, ia Paragraph 2 offhe application it has been prayed for a direction to the appeUaat University to declare ttie results of fhe respondent students tareatirtg fhein as private studeuts as fhey had appeared for fhe fiinal exaoiiaation of said courses held ia acadenuc session 2010-2011, 4. In view of tkie above, learaed counsel for the appeUants has submitted that fhe writ appeUants have no objectiou to declare the result of fhe respondents as private students. 5. Siace therc is no objection on tiie side of fhe writ appeUants, we dispose of all fhe four writ appeals with a direction fhat the results of the respondent-stadents shaU be declared treatiag fhenx as private students, 6« The ixnpugned order dated 08,08.2011 passed by the learaed siagle judge shall staad modi&ed to fhe above exte^t^ Sd/- I.M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- G. Minhajuddin Judge Rao ^