HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO.2989 OF 2010 PETITIONER . Shiv Kumar Gabel Versus RESPONDENTS Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) & Another (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :— Shri Ansul R. Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 28th day of June, 2010) 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that on 17—5-2010, the petitioner has moved the appiication vide Annexure P—t before the respondent for grant of temporary stage carriage permit on the route Bankimongra to Chandrapur via Korba, Champa, Saragaon, Baradwar, Sakti, Adbhar, Bhadrichowki, Baghod and back one return trip daiiy. However, tiil date the same has not been decided by the respondents. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide the said application (Annexure P—1) expeditiously. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the application (Annexure P-t) shall be decided within a reasonable time from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4, in view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider and decide the application dated 17—5—2010 (Annexure P-1) within a reasonable time from the date of production of a certified copy of this order by the petitioner. 5. With the aforesaid direction/ observation, this petition stands finally disposed of. ,iiw Sd/- l l Satish Judge K.Agnihotri fill, l i ashok