g ^l IN THE HIGH COUKT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Vftit Petitian No.^z?72002 pErmoNER ^{T^, Aged< ,^3^^^K .-^..•'•'". ^'~?"',' ..y^" Ustric ^O' ' , f^ , f s't> QcnPrakaah Dadsena ^ S/oAn-ffirSmghDadsena, ^^i'S'. ASed about 45 years' Pithora, Tehsil and Ustrict- Afahasainund. '•^;^!'^^ y^r'" ...x'-!c w ...-c'- REiPONDENT - Vasus- te of Chhattisgaiii, ThroughSeaTetaiy, Department Ot Local Self Govt. Mflntralaya, Siastri Chowk, Raipur. Z Shri Kamal Nahore, S/oS.K.Fatel, 'VSlage- Aijum, P.0. Gadbeda, District- Mahtisamiind. 3. Election Qf&cer, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Pifhora, Mflhasamtmd. A. Dwarika, R/o Pufgtina, P.0. Gadhbeda, Mahasamund. 5. PraMadPateI, R/'o TUanjanpur, P.0. Bhagat Deori ^fliajoriksankra, Mahasamund. 6. Bhurearilfll, R/o ChirapaH, P.0. Bundeli, Mahasaniund. 7. Bhushanlal Patel, S/o Sakharam Patel, R/o Rarryur, P.O.-Bacnm Etadar, MalMsamund. ..^'^^ /y^ "?' ^ QlQ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT..PETITION N0.927 OF 2002 Om Prakash Dadsena Versus State ofChhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- None for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyerforthe State. Shri Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate for the respondent No.2. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 22nd day ofJune,2010) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner, The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. 2) In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Consequently, interim order passed earlier stands discharged. __— Sd/- Satish K. Agiiifaai Judge Gown ^MI^