IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1608 of 2010 1. MD. MAHFUZ ALAM @ MAHFOOZ ALAM S/O SRI MANJOOR ALAM R/O VILL.- BARHULIA, P.S.- SIMRI, DISTT.- DARBHANGA. VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, HEALTH MEDICAL EDUCATION AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, NEW SECRETARIAT, VIKAS BHAWAN, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR-IN-CHIEF, HEALTH SERVICES NEW SECRETARIAT, VIKASH BHAWAN, PATNA 3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR HEALTH SERVICES, DARBHANGA 4. THE CIVIL SURGEON-CUM-CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER DARBHANGA 5. THE CIVIL SURGEON-CUM-CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER DARBHANGA 6. THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICER DARBHANGA DIVISION, DARBHANGA 7. THE INCHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE (BIRAUL), DISTT.- DARBHANGA ----------- 02 23.07.2010 The petitioner states that he was working in the Health Department. His services were unceremoniously terminated in the year 2001. He came to this Court and ultimately along with a large number of cases all matters was directed to be examined by the five member committee. The committee gave a report that the appointment of the petitioner was on basis of a forged letter. Petitioner asserts that the committee gave its finding even without noticing and hearing the petitioner. Learned Senior Counsel, Mr. K.N. Singh appearing for the petitioner submits that this Court has already set aside the report of the five member committee and later the Division Bench of this Court has constituted a single man committee of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Uday Sinha (Retd.) to examine each case individualy and give a finding. The petitioner prays that he may also be permitted to represent - 2 - before the designated authority, that is, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Uday Sinha (Retd.), who would consider the matter along with all other similar cases which he is considering. Having considered the matter, in my view, this being one of the cases out of a large number cases which are already before the designated committee as aforesaid. This Court would request the committee also to consider the case of the petitioner upon petitioner moving the committee with all relevant papers. The finding of the committee recorded would bind the petitioner subject to such remedy as he may avail. The writ petition stands disposed of. Trivedi (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)