IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32393 of 2008 RAJESH KUMAR RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.8.2008 Heard. The allegation is that the petitioner along with another accused took away the sister of the informant with the purpose of marrying her. The defence is that the lady herself went out of her house and got herself married to the petitioner. However, the rejection order indicates that the lady in her statement in the case diary has explained the swearing in of the affidavit indicating marriage of the lady to the petitioner and has supported the allegation that the petitioner took her away to Chandigarh and different places. In the light of the fact as indicated, prayer for bail of the petitioner is dismissed. However, as soon as the lady is examined in the court below, the petitioner shall renew his prayer for bail. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )