IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4388 of 2009 BIRENDRA SAH SON OF HAJARILAL SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KAPOOR PAKRI,P.S.SHIKARGANJ,DISTT.EAST CHAMPARAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.50669 of 2008 SANTOSH PRASAD @ MEHMAN SON OF LATE YADAV LAL SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHENG,P.S.MEJARGANJ,DISTT.SITAMARHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.2423 of 2009 LAL MOHAMMAD SON OF EKBAL HUSSAIN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHHATAUNA,P.S.PIPRA BAZAR,DISTRICT RAUTHAT(NEPAL) Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 24.3.2009 Since all the above three applications arise out of one and the same police case, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. For the occurrence of 8.8.2008, present first information report was registered on 12.8.2008 for offence under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code against unknown. Later on by order dated 26.8.2008, Section 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code has been added. The informant in his written report has alleged that his son Prakash alias Bittu was kidnapped. Submission is that the Chief Judicial Magistrate has wrongly noted that ransom was demanded from the mobile of the petitioner Birendra Sah. It was verified in course of investigation and it was found that the address given was incorrect. Further submission is that none of the petitioners are named in the first information report, they have not been put on test identified parade and no incriminating article linking the petitioners with the alleged offence was recovered. It is also stated that there is nothing 2 specific in the case diary that the victim was released after realization of ransom. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in Mehsi P.S.Case No. 60 of 2008. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)