IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 2ND MARCH 2010 / 11TH PHALGUNA 1931 RP.No. 175 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.26563/2009 Dated 20/11/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- SASI THOMAS, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KSEB, (RETD.)PAZHEMPALLY HOUSE, GRACE VILLA, SANTHIGRAM, PADNAKKAD P.O., KASARAGOD. BY ADV. SRI.SOJAN MICHEAL RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 -------------------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, KASARAGOD. SC FOR KSEB SRI. ASHOK M CHERIAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- R.P. NO.175 OF 2010 (M) in WP(c).No.26563/2009 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T The writ petition was disposed of by judgment dated 20.11.2009, holding that in view of he pendency of vigilance inquiry, petitioner cannot be asked for settlement of his retirement benefits. In this review petition, it is pointed out that the non liability certificate has been issued and that proceedings under Rule 3 have not been initiated. 2. However, as rightly pointed out by the counsel for the respondents, as at present Vigilance Enquiry is pending and therefore in view of Rule 3A of Part-III KSR what is permissible to be paid to the petitioner is only minimum pension, which is being paid. Therefore, so long as vigilance enquiry is pending petitioner can have only minimum pension which is now being paid. Therefore I see no ground to review the judgment. Review Petition fails and is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :