C.W.P No. 18536 of 2007 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No. 18536 of 2007 Date of decision : May 04 , 2009 HC Kulbir Singh, ...... Petitioner (s) v. State of Haryana and others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. S.S.Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.K.Gupta, Addl.A.G Haryana for the respondents. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J The petitioner seeks the quashing of the order dated 26.5.2004 (Annexure P-1) whereby he was conveyed adverse remarks recorded in his ACR for the period 1.4.2003 to 25.7.2003, the order dated 30.9.2004 (Annexure P-3) whereby his representation against the adverse remarks was rejected, and the order dated 14.3.2005 (Annexure P-5), whereby his appeal against the aforesaid orders was rejected. The primary argument of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the adverse remarks were totally without any basis and that with C.W.P No. 18536 of 2007 ::2:: regard to the allegations as mentioned against general remarks in the ACR (Annexure P-1), respondent No.4 by order dated 25.2.2004 exonerated the petitioner of the charges levelled against him. In my opinion it would not be possible for this Court to come to a conclusion regarding the existence or non-existence of the basis in extraordinary jurisdiction. It is to be noticed that every ACR goes through three stages viz. reporting officer, reviewing officer and the accepting officer. This three tier process has been put into place only to obviate any arbitrary grading of an official. Apart from this the petitioner has moved representations right up to the level of the Government and the same have been rejected. In the circumstances this writ petition is dismissed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) May 04, 2009. JUDGE `kk'