IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2009 / 20TH SRAVANA 1931 RP.No. 797 of 2008(N) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.33943/2001 Dated 27/06/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): REVIEW PETITIONER --------------------------------------- JOY JOSEPH, PARTNER, P.J. ICE PLANT PUTHENTHURUTHU, SAKTHIKULANGARA, KOLLAM BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT POWER DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 3. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VAIDYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (COMM & TARIFF) KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VAIDYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD ELECTRICAL DIVISION, KOLLAM 6. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELECTRICAL MAJOR SECTION, SAKTHIKULANGARA ,KOLLAM THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- R.P. No. 797 of 2008 in O.P.No. 33943 OF 2001 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of August, 2009 O R D E R Review Petition is filed stating that in view of the circular, the remedy by way of appeal provided in the judgment is not effective. However, it is seen that petitioner has not challenged the circular. Therefore I do not find any ground to entertain the Review Petition. Review Petition is accordingly dismissed. (C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge kk 2