IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.861 of 2010 PANNU LAL VISHWAKARMA @ PANNU VISHWAKARMA son of Sri Charitar Vishwakarma resident of village Lodipur (Chandmari), P.O. Chandmari, P.S. Shahpur, District Patna … Opposite Party/Appellant Versus CHANDRAWATI DEVI wife of Sri Pannu Lal Vishwakarma alias Pannu Bishwakarma, resident of village Lodipur (Chandmari), P.O. Chandmari, P.S. Shahpur, District Patna, at present resident of village/mohalla Mishra Tola, Mahajan Toli No. 1, P.S. Arrah Town, P.O. Arrah,District Bhojpur … …Petitioner/Respondent ----------- 3 03.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the impugned order dated 14.09.2010 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhojpur at Ara. The impugned order clearly shows that it is a consent order whereunder in a proceeding for restitution of conjugal rights filed by the wife, terms of settlement have been incorporated in very simple language and the wife has also agreed to withdraw her criminal case under section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The main objection of the appellant is to a term of compromise that the wife of the appellant will live one week with the husband at Patna and next one week at Ara, because her younger daughter is doing job at Ara. 2 In our view, the nature of the impugned order does not permit rescrutiny by way of appeal on the ground that the order of compromise has not correctly been recorded. Hence, this appeal is dismissed. In case the appellant has any grievance against proper recording of the order dated 14.09.2010, he will be at liberty to approach the Family Court, Bhojpur at Ara. SC (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)