HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO. 4854 OF 2006 DATED: 27.03.2006 Between: M. Vasudeva Goud … Petitioner and Principal Secretary to Home and others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO. 4854 OF 2006 ORAL ORDER: The writ petition is filed alleging that the several complaints of the petitioner are neither being entertained nor action taken thereupon by the 4th respondent, in respect of alleged commission of cognizable offences by the 5th respondent. The 4th respondent has filed a counter affidavit stating that the petitioner’s brother’s son one M. Bal Raj Goud had approached the answering respondent’s- police station 19.1.2006 and had lodged a complaint. As the complaint disclosed a non-cognizable offence, an entry was made in the General Diary and an enquiry conducted during which it was revealed that it was a civil matter and thereupon no action was taken. It is also stated that the complainant was asked to produce any documentary evidence, but he failed to produce any documents. The counter affidavit further asserts that the petitioner’s allegation that the answering respondent refused to receive the complaint of the petitioner, is untrue and is categorically denied. It is specifically pleaded that the petitioner never approached the respondent’s-police station at any point of time, there was no refusal to entertain and register the complaint of the petitioner. It is specifically denied that the complaint dated 2.2.2006 was lodged by the petitioner. The respondent specifically pleads that he did not receive any such complaint and the petitioner never approached the police station. In view of the categorical denial, no action is called for. The writ petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. No order as to costs. ------------------------------- GODA RAGHURAM, J Date: 27.03.2006 Note: CC by tomorrw Bo CVM