IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6691 of 2011 Nilesh Kumar Choudhary S/o Navin Choudhary R/o vill. & P.O. Mahadevpur, P.S. Amarpur, Dist. Banka, ---Petitioner. Versus 1. The Union Of India through Secretary Home, Govt. of India, New Delhi. 2. D.I.G.Amethi Range, Group Centre Campus, C.R.P.F. Lucknow. 3. Director General, C.R.P.F., New Delhi. 4. Commandant, 198 Battalion, C.R.P.F. Bishakhapattanam Andra Pradesh 5. The Commandant, 198 Battalion, C.R.P.F., Mokamaghat, Patna. ---Respondents. ----------- 03 13.07.2011 Petitioner assails the order of dismissal passed by the disciplinary authority of respondent Central Reserve Police Force ( for short ‘the CRPF’) as contained inAnnexure-7 as also the appellate order dated 01.09.2010 as contained in Annexure-8. There is no dispute that the Central Reserve Police Force Rules 1955 covers the case of the petitioner. Rule 29 thereof provides revision to be filed against the appellate order. The petitioner has, thus, remedy against the impugned order. In that view of the matter this Court declines to invoke its extra ordinary writ jurisdiction for setting aside the order(s) impugned in the present application. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner states that revision application would be preferred within 04 weeks from today. If any such revision application is filed within the aforesaid time together with a copy of the present order, I am sure, the concerned authority of the C.R.P.F. shall consider and dispose of the said revision application in accordance with law. With this observation, the application stands disposed of. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )