WP(C) 1513/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA The matter relates to selection and appointment of Anganbadi Wor ker for which the petitioner was an aspirant. The Anganbadi center is Phaliamari Char (Center No. 412) in the district of Morigaon. According to the petitioner, the respondent No. 5 who has been selected and appointed is not a resident of t he area for which the Anganbadi center functions. Another allegation made in the writ petition is that in the inte rview, the Selection Committee, more particularly the Chairman awarded marks to the respondent No. 5 beyond the permissible limit. I have heard Mr. S.K. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. K. Dihingia, learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Department. I have also heard Ms. D. Sinha, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5. So far as the grievance relating to residential status of the re spondent No. 5 is concerned, the same is said to be covered by judgment and orde r dated 11.5.2011 passed in a batch of writ petitions, first one being WP(C) No. 215/2010. Accordingly the appropriate authority in terms of the directions cont ained in the said judgment and order may look into the said grievance. So far as the second grievance is concerned, the said authority may also look into the grievance of the petitioner. However, no adverse order sh all be passed against the respondent No. 5 without giving her an opportunity of being heard. The petitioner may obtain a certified copy of this order and fur nish the same to the Director of Social Welfare Department along with the copy o f the writ petition and its enclosure for his necessary follow up action. The pe titioner may also furnish a copy of the affidavit-in-reply to the said Director. Be it stated here that the official respondents have not filed a ny counter affidavit. Writ petition is disposed of.