FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3940 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. V.D. Salunke, Advocate for the petitioner Mrs Gondhalekar, AGP for the respondent No.1 Mr. N.L. Jadhav,Advocate for respondent Nos. 8 to 10. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE :- 7th December, 2010. PER COURT :- 1] The petitioner, who claims to be the Secretary of the Vaidyanath Education Society, has approached this court contending that the respondent No.4, who is the Head Master of Vaidyanath Madhyamik Vidyalaya is indulging into illegal activities and the same also is found by the Respondent No.1 Education Officer. 2] In the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of the Education Officer, it is categorically stated that there are disputes between the two groups of management and the said disputes are pending before the competent authorities. It is, however, stated that in order to secure the interest of the students, the appointments made by the Head Master for a temporary period between 16.8.2009 to 11.10.2009 have been approved only for 3 months. In so far as the grievance of the petitioner is concerned, the same is taken are of by para.5 of the affidavit which reads FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3940 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 thus :- “It is submitted that, if in future the head master makes a proposal and obtains permission for advertising the said posts that too after taking permission from the B.C. Cell and as per the roster, then in that event, by following due process of law, the office of this Deponent will scrutinize the proposal and pass suitable orders, at the relevant time." It is thus clear that unless the permission is obtained from B.C. Cell and the appointments are made in accordance with due process of law, the same would not be approved by the Education Officer. 3] In view of the categorical statements made in para.5, which are reproduced hereinabove, the grievance of the petitioner does not survive. As such, the writ petition is disposed of. [R.M. BORDE, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/- FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3940 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 3