BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Eighth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15467 of 2011 1. KHAN BAI 2. RAZEETH KHAN 3. TAILOR RAVI @ TAILOR SABI 4. AHAMED 5. AKBAR ALI @ AKBAR : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE THOTTIYAM POLICE STATION, THOTTIYAM TALUK, TRICHY DISTRICT. CRIME NO.305/2011 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.CHANDRASEKARAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr. K.S.DURAIPANDIAN Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as accused and they prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 427 and 506(i) I.P.C. in Crime No.305 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. Heard Mr.T.Chandrasekaran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) would submit in his argument that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Musiri and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Musiri and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. Sd/- 28/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MUSIRI. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THOTTIYAM POLICE STATION, THOTTIYAM TALUK, TRICHY DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. T.CHANDRASEKARAN Advocate SR.No.41674 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15467 of 2011 Date :28/11/2011 NSV/1.12.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/