1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 3679/2001 (Addul Nayeem Khan Abdul Rehaman Khan VERSUS Nagpur Municipal Corporation, through its Municipal Commissioner & another ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Radke, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Samarth, counsel for the respondents. CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 18, 2008. Heard. In the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent Corporation to grant promotion to the petitioner on the post of Station Officer. The counsel for the petitioner states that the respondent Corporation has granted promotion to the petitioner to the said post with effect from 05.11.2007, therefore, the cause of action in the present writ petition does not survive. However, since the respondent failed to grant appropriate deemed date of promotion i.e. with effect from 20.07.1990, the petitioner has moved Civil Application No. 803/2008 seeking permission to amend the petition. 2 Mr. Samarth, the learned counsel for the respondent Corporation, states that since the main grievance of the petitioner in the petition is redressed, so far as grant of appropriate deemed date is concerned, if the petitioner makes an application/representation to the respondent no. 1, same would be considered according to law. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, we see no reason to keep the petition pending and since the respondent is ready and willing to consider the prayer of the petitioner for grant of deemed date, we permit the petitioner to make a representation in this regard to the respondent no.1 within a period of two weeks from today and if such representation is made, we expect respondent Corporation to consider the same on its own merits according to law and procedure prescribed in this behalf within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. The civil application is also disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE APTE