1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2610 OF 2009 Mahabir Ninuwal .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & 12 Ors. .. Respondents Mr. A.V. Anturkar i/b Ms. Sugandh B. Deshmukh for the petitioner. Mr. Milind More, AGP for the respondent nos. 1 to 3. Ms. Lakshmi Murali for respondent nos. 5 to 13. CORAM : J.N. PATEL & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ DATE : 30TH MARCH, 2010 P.C. : 1 Heard. 2 By this petition, Petitioner had prayed for direction against the Respondents-MHADA for taking immediate action in respect of the illegal construction made on the suit property by the Respondent/Developer M/s Neptune Co-operative Housing Society and to stop the construction. Petitioner had further prayed for direction against Respondent-MHADA not to allow any development or construction on the suit property. It is contended that without moving or approaching Respondent-MHADA the Respondent/Developer is developing the suit property and carrying out unlawful construction over the suit property. In our opinion, all the grievances can be made by approaching 2 competent authority of MHADA with his representation. Under these circumstances, Petitioner must be left with remedy of approaching competent authority of MHADA with his representation alongwith grievances. If approached, the competent authority of MHADA shall decide the representation in accordance with law. 3 Petition stands dismissed. (A.P. Bhangale, J.) ( J.N. Patel, J.)