IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7294 of 2009 Date of Decision: February 9, 2010 Smt. Asha Rani. ….Petitioner Versus Naresh Kumar. …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present: Mr. Balkar Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vimal Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent. S.D. Anand, J. The impugned order is cryptic on the face of it. The learned Rent Controller did not, at all, indicate the premise which persuaded her to assess the provisional rent at the rate of Rs.650/- per month. It is apparent from the record that the party opposite had raised a plea that the rent was payable at a different rate. The petition shall stand allowed. The impugned order shall stand set aside. The matter shall be listed before the learned Rent Controller on 25.02.2010. The C.R. No. 7294 of 2009 learned Rent Controller shall proceed to dispose of the matter afresh by recording a self-contained order. The parties, through their learned counsel, are directed to appear before the learned Rent Controller on 25.02.2010. Disposed of accordingly. February 9, 2010 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2