IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2011 / 20TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21947 of 2011(P) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- IBRAHIM HAJI, AGED 69, S/O.KUNHAMMED KUTTY HAJI, MAYYERI HOUSE, KADUNGATHUNDU, VALAVANNOOR, TIRUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, 19/269-A, PERINTALMANNA ROAD, KUNNUMMAL, MALAPPURAM. PIN-676 505. 2. THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PIN-695 001. R1 & R2 BY SRI. M.K.C. DAS, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/08/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.21947/2011-P: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R.1. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R.1. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE APPEAL. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE STAY PETITION. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 17/04/2011. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE REPLY. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).21947/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 11th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT The prayer sought in the writ petition is for a direction to the second respondent to deal with Exts.P4 and P5 expeditiously. According to the petitioner, aggrieved by Ext.P3 order passed by the first respondent directing re-location of his workshop, he has filed Ext.P4 appeal before the second respondent. Along with Ext.P4, petitioner has also filed Ext.P5 stay petition for suspension of Ext.P3 order. Neither the appeal nor the stay petition has been considered by the appellate authority, which led the petitioner to file this writ petition. 2. According to the petitioner in the meanwhile, he also been asked to implement Ext.P3, by Ext.P6 notice issued by the first respondent. 3. I heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 4. In the facts as stated above, the only order that is now required to be passed is that the second respondent shall deal W.P.(C).21947/11 2 with, if not Ext.P4 appeal, at least Ext.P5 stay petition expeditiously. This the second respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Till such time, penal action threatened in Ext.P6 shall not be initiated against the petitioner. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs