IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5634 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 13, 2010 Bhagwanti …Petitioner Versus Nachhatar Singh … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Amit Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Objector-petitioner is assailing the order dated 11.06.2010 passed by the learned Executing Court, whereby the objections filed by the petitioner were rejected. The brief facts of the present case, inter-alia, are that suit for possession was filed by the decree-holder against Ranjit Singh. The suit for possession was decreed on 30.10.2001. In an execution moved by the decree-holder, C.R. No.5634 of 2010 objections were preferred by the present petitioner, resisting the decree for possession. In paragraph no.2 of the petition preferred before this Court, objector-petitioner is contending after the death of father-in-law of the present petitioner, the petitioner along with her husband Jagir Singh shifted to Anniya Wala Mohalla, Samrala Road, Khanna; the possession of the house i.e. disputed property was handed over to Gurdial Singh, father of the judgment debtor and his family. From the contents of paragraph no.2 of the petition, I have no hesitation to hold that petitioner – objector is not claiming himself in possession of the property in dispute. He is claiming only title over the property. Decree for possession can be resisted only by the person, who claims himself in possession of the property in disputed. Decree for possession cannot be resisted by the person who is not claiming himself into possession of the property in dispute. No interference is called for. Present petition is dismissed. September 13, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2