CWP No. 265 of 2005 10.12.2007 Present: Mr. Surinder Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.M.Bisht, DAG, for respondents No. 1, 2, 4 and 5. Mr. V.D.Khidta, counsel for respondent No. 3. Mr. Vikram Thakur, vice counsel for respondents No. 7 to 9. Mr. Rahul Mahajan, counsel for respondent No. 10. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that due to subsequent events, the writ petition has become infructuous and he does not press the same. The petition is dismissed as not pressed. ( Deepak Gupta ), J. December 10, 2007(K) ( V. K. Ahuja ), J.