IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11549 of 2006 Ranjana Kumari, W/o Sri Ramprit Mahto, Resident of Village Korbaddha, Tabhka, P.O. Raghopur, P.S. Bibhutipur, District Samastipur. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Primary and Adult Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Samastipur. 4. The Block Development Officer, Bibhutipur Block, District Samastipur. 5. The District Education Officer, Samastipur. 6. The Block Education Extension Officer, Bibhutipur Block, District Samastipur. 7. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Khas Tabhka, North Bibhutipur Block, Samastipur. 8. The Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj, Khas sTabhka, North Bibhutipur, District Samastipur. 9. Smt. Poji Davi, W/o Sri Ghanshyam Singh, Village & Post Office Raghopur, P.S. Bibhutipur, District Samastipur. -------- Respondents ----------- 2 24.08.2010 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State in respect of the prayer of the petitioner in this writ application, which reads as follows:- “1(A) To set aside letter No. 17 dtd. 30.4.2005 as contained in Annexure-2, issued under the joint signatures of the Mukhia and the Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Khas Tabhka North, Bibhutipur Block, Samastipur, so far the same relates to selection and appointment of respondent no.10 as Shiksha Mitra at Gram Panchayat Raj Khas Tabhaka, made against the one of the two Unreserved seats. 2 B. For a direction upon the respondent authorities to select and appoint the petitioner as Shiksha Mitra at Gram Panchayat Raj Khas Tabhaka, against the one of the two Unreserved seats in place of the respondent no.10 with all the consequential benefits.” this Court would find that the said relief of the petitioner cannot be given on the ground of abolition of the post of Shiksha Mitra with effect from 1.7.2006. The further grievance of the petitioner as with regard to the illegality committed by the Mukhia, infact, has been redressed as has been stated in paragraph no.7 of the counter affidavit directing lodging of the First Information Report against the Mukhia. In any view of the matter, once the petitioner goes out of scene during tenure of her Shiksha Mitra on account of non- continuance or non-joining of the training programme, it would be difficult for this Court now to issue any direction as with regard to her joining on the said post of Shiksha Mitra when the same has stood abolished with effect from 1.7.2006. 3 Thus, for the reasons indicated above, this Court would not find any merit in this application and the same is accordingly dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)