SIMRi ^s^ :MP c^ /^/ L IN THE HI6H COiJRT OF .JUDICATURE CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR V/. P. ('SI N0. <-l<y':H / 2006 y^>+i-f-tnvijS>r* ri*> '...-"'/^*' V2"^y'..^ l..-'''^\>''- ..••"" ^••C^K^' 5?"' ;','-^>'.-?' ^^^ .s,6'" >" i/o" ^irtn-f- ^S^ifV T=hi!n^!)|n yV/o Shri Rnjendra Sinqh Thakur, .AG€Q"sbout 40 vgcirs. ^g<-j- i gQchBr fc?OVgP?!iTflgnT t?iris ^li^cil^ School L.QK'h^nDUT'i Dls't' '- Kanker-fC.'S.) i^SSDQHd^Hi-S /:!. £p^ •^^ ^' s>^ ^ C+Q+^ Q4. ^^jrt^^-4-I^Qp^ 3'^'"' ° - i fiFOuutl - i {"(£ ^5gC< &TGPY.. Department of School fcducation, &.K.S. Bhnw"i'i. RoiDur hi'=?t : ^ni^'sf-fC.G.} p<i.^-<-ini/—l"l.-rljj^n-i-inui GJ-f-^-ir'gf KanK.er-tC.c?-) Block ^(JLEc'3tt'on OT'Mcar c-nor'Qniu, uisj '• ^uriKer—ii-.o.j ^' Vb'RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR I5SUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT. VVRITS, DIRECTIC'N ETC TO DC' -J'JSTECE IN THt M*- MATTER- HE6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR Petitioner Re^>ondents W. P. fa) No. 4778 of 2006 Smt. Asha Thakur Versus State of Chhattisgarh & others 1. Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Shri Anil Singh Rajput, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri Satish Supta, Deputy Sovernment Advocate for the reqiondents/State. OR&ER (5th September. 2006) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that while working as Assistcnt Taicher, the petitioner has gone on training to improve his qualifications on his own expenses <md acquired D. Ed. Cer-tificate. 2. According to leamed counsel for the petitioner, D. Ed. Certificate is equal to that of B. Ed, AA. Ed, B.T.I. Certificate and as such he is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg ond ano-ther {2006 (tl) MPJR-C6 96}. ^ (^) 3. Leamed counsel for the petitioner further submits that in view of the decision of this Court, the petitioner seeks a liberty of •ttiis Court to make a representation to the concemed cMthorities for grant of appropriate relief, to which leamed counsel appearing for the reqaondents hds no objection 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with -the aforementioned liberty. In the event, such representation is fited by the petitjoner, the same ^»all be decided, in accordance with law, on its own merit, within a reasonable time. Bablu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge s^ •< E£S£.-&__J.