GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 8907 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 8907 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 8907 OF 2004 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri R.G.Ketkar with R.S.Khadapkar for the petitioner. Shri M.V.Shetty with Anjali Singh for Respondents 1 and2 . CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & SMT. SMT. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 2ND MARCH, 2005 2ND MARCH, 2005 2ND MARCH, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By this petition, the petitioner is challenging the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for staying of the departmental proceedings. The Tribunal has given cogent reasons for rejecting the prayer. There is no illegality or jurisdictional error committed by the Tribunal in so doing. In our opinion no interference is called for. Observations made by the Tribunal in the penultimate paragraph of the order are obviously primafacie and the enquiry officer shall not be in any manner biased by reason of this observations. With these observations the petition is dismissed. .....