IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6506 of 2011 SHAMSHER SINGH SON OF LATE SARDAR RAM SINGH, RESIDENT OF PURANI GALI, P.S. CITY CHOWK, PATNA CITY, DISTRICT PATNA. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DR. SURJIT SINGH, SON OF LATE HANNAM SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA ABDULES LANE, MACHHUA TOLI, P.S. KADAM KUAN, DISTRICT PATNA. ... ... OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 16.3.2011. Heard Mr. Tuhin Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.M.P. Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor on restoration matter. The present petition has been filed for restoration of Cr.Misc. No.16222 of 2001, which stood dismissed on 18.8.2010 due to non prosecution. It was submitted that on the date, when the case was rejected, learned counsel for the petitioner was out of station due to certain pressing issues. Unfortunately, the clerk was also ill and junior counsel was also out of station. Due to that reason, on the date, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner and petition stood rejected. Cr. Misc. No.16222 of 2001 was taken up on 13.8.2010. When it was called 2 out, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to press this petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. This court noticed that in this case, interim order of stay was continuing since 14.7.2003. However, the case was adjourned for the day. Again on 18.8.2010, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner and the petition stood rejected due to non prosecution. I have considered the grounds set forth in the petition for restoration. The court is of the opinion that the grounds set forth in the petition is not sufficient to persuade the court to pass a favourable order. Thus, the restoration petition stands rejected. Md.S ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)