IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3662 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 3662 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 3662 OF 2006 Mungshi Vidyalaya, Mungshi, District Solapur. ...Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3651 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 3651 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 3651 OF 2006 Kauthali Vidyalaya, Kauthali, District Solapur. ...Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3652 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 3652 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 3652 OF 2006 Kasari Vidyalaya Kasari, District Solapur. ...Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3653 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 3653 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 3653 OF 2006 Shri Sharadchandraji Pawar Vidyalaya, District Solapur. ...Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3654 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 3654 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 3654 OF 2006 Jai Jagdamba Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha, District Solapur. ...Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4837 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 4837 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 4837 OF 2005 Sharadadevi Prashala, Vairag, District Solapur. ...Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents In all matters : In all matters : In all matters : Mr.Vishwas S. Deokar for the Petitioners. Mr.P.I. Khemani, Assistant Government Pleader, for the Respondents. CORAM : H.S. BEDI, C.J., & CORAM : H.S. BEDI, C.J., & CORAM : H.S. BEDI, C.J., & V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : OCTOBER 10, 2006 DATED : OCTOBER 10, 2006 DATED : OCTOBER 10, 2006 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. We have heard the learned Advocates for the parties. 2. The petitioners have been in Court time and again. When the matters came up, several stands were taken by the respondents. At one time, the stand taken was that there was a ban on fresh recruitments, and as such, the petitioners could not be granted any benefit. At another stage it was pleaded that the number of students did not justify the creation of posts for the petitioners. We also learn that in spite of the orders - 3 - made by this Court in earlier writ petitions, the petitioners’ cases have not been properly considered by the appropriate authority. 3. We, accordingly, permit the petitioners to appear before respondent no.2 who shall, after hearing the petitioners and others who are likely to be affected, pass a fresh order in accordance with the directions issued by this Court from time to time, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the petitioners fail before respondent no.2, they would be at liberty to come to the Court again. 4. Writ petitions are disposed of, accordingly. CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J.