^it&c 8EKC9 C^- } IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSHGARH AT BILASPUR C.G, W.P. (S) No.....!.?1.).?........2011 PETTIONER Mitam Chand Daharwal, S/o Shri Amrit lal Daharwal, Aged about 32 years Village Chatauna HirriMines District Bilaspur(C,G) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ov ^l^ ^•""^*^"-...-:'^ •"'^iS*'" ...•<>7p '^.^yly ^•""^_ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through - the Secretary Panchyat and 2au'c,i ^ welfare Departraent D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) '~Ct>t(^ ^•Fl-t-'tl'l^. sH\'tf^-~ 2. Janpad PancUyat paudi Uproda District Korba (C.G) ^i-s^ -fca1^ .,."5"''=%. ;.',<A^ -^ 1 %'iffSswk. 1 1 i va-y-^ j HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGiWH : BiLASPUR WRiTP_ETJTION_(SLNai3100F2011 PETITIONER Mitam Chand Daharwat RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Another (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ot India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Ajay Shrivasteva, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panet Lawyer for the State. ORDER(QRAL) (Passed on this 10*' day of hterch, 2011) 1. Learned counset appearing for ttie petittoner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with iiberty to pursue the representation dated 05/02/2011 (Annexure P/5) wherein, it is stated that in view of the inten/ening hoiictays, tt was neither practicable nor possibie to receive infonnation and appear in the counseling on 27/12/2010. 2. Accordingly, the Collector, Korba is directed to look into fte arievance of the Detitioner, as reoresented to him on 05/02/201 1 (Annexure P/6), as eariy as possible, preferable within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and pass an appropriate order, in accordance witii law. 3. Accordmgly, the writ petition is dismisssd as withdrawn wtth the above-stated observation. — Sd/- SatishK. AgBihotn Judge Arun