In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … COCP No. 1612 of 2008 Date of decision: August 10, 2009 Vikas alias Raju and another ..Petitioners Versus Harkesh Kumar son of Joginder Pal ..Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Ms. Divya Sharma,Advocate for the petitioner with petitioner No.2 Mr. S.K.Sandhir, Advocate for respondent with respondent. ,,, Rakesh Kumar Garg,J(Oral) In the present Contempt Petition, the grievance of the petitioners is that in spite of the order dated 29.11.2007 passed in Civil Revision No.6169 of 2007 whereby their dispossession from the tenanted premises was stayed, they have been dispossessed from the demised premises. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent- landlord has categorically stated that the petitioners are very much in possession of the tenanted premises and the present contempt petition is now a bundle of lies. The parties are present in court. Respondent has also stated in the court that the petitioners are in possession of the tenanted premises. In view of the fact that respondent has stated before this Court that the petitioners are in possession of the tenanted premises, this Court is not proceeding further in the present contempt petition as the petitioners are in possession of the tenanted premises as submitted by the respondent. Rule discharged. If the possession of the petitioners is disturbed by the respondent, the petitioners are free to move necessary application to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ludhiana who will look into any such complaint of the petitioners in accordance with law. August 10, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE