:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1064 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1064 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1064 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL NO. 467 OF 2004 APPEAL NO. 467 OF 2004 APPEAL NO. 467 OF 2004 Pushpa P. Jain & Ors. ..Appellants versus Rakesh P. Jain ..Respondent Mr. Zaidy i/b. M/s. Zaidy & Co. for the Appellants. Mr. R. V. Govilkar i/b. Mr. S. V. Pikale for the Respondent. CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & S. J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. S. J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. S. J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 13TH APRIL, 2006 DATE : 13TH APRIL, 2006 DATE : 13TH APRIL, 2006 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : . Heard learned counsel for the Appellants and the Respondent. This Notice of Motion is taken out for recalling the order of dismissal dated 27.3.2006. Perused the Affidavit in Support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out for recalling the order dated 27.3.2006. There is no case of inaction, negligence and want of bonafide on the part of the Appellants. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Notice of Motion disposed of accordingly. (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ) :2: (S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.) (S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.) (S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.)