THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT APPEAL NO.2089 of 2005 28th October 2005 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 18.10.2005 in W.P.M.P.No.28830 of 2005 in W.P.NO.22505 OF 2005 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1. Manjeera Grameena Bank, Jogipet, Medak District @ Sangareddy, Rep.by its Chairman. 2. The Chairman and Disciplinary Authority, Manjeera Grameena Bank, Jogipet, Medak District @ Sangareddy. …APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS AND B.Gopalakrishna, S/o.B.Mangaiah, 45 years, Ex.Clerk-cum-Cashier, Manjeera Grameena Bank, Sangareddy (H.Q.Jogipet), Medak District, R/o.13-85/19, SN Colony, R.C.Puram, Medak District. …RESPONDENT/APPELLANT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT APPEAL NO.2089 OF 2005 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Mr Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard both the sides. At their request, the Writ Appeal itself is taken up for disposal. The appellant-Bank is the respondent in Writ Petition No.22505 of 2005 filed by the respondent herein seeking to assail the order dated 05.10.2005 rejecting his representation of reinstatement. The learned Single Judge granted interim injunction dated 18.10.2005 in W.P.M.P.No.28830 of 2005 mainly on the ground that the respondent herein was absolved from the criminal charge for the offence under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. Having regard to the fact that the action of the appellant in rejecting the representation of the respondent mainly based on the conviction without taking any action internally, we do not find any justification to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge. Hence, there are no merits. The Writ Appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) ___________________ (DR G.YETHIRAJULU, J) 28th October 2005 RRB