IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 11148 of 2006 Date of Decision: 25.2.2008 Sangarh Vahini ......Petitioner through Mr. Avnish Mittal, Advocate Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondent through Mr. Sanjiv Kaushik, Addl. A.G. Haryana CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER JAIN, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ***** Vijender Jain, Chief Justice (Oral) In view of Annexure R-1 filed by the respondents, no further relief can be granted in this writ petition, which is to the following effect:- “ In partial modification of the instructions issued vide Memo No. 1258-STR-1-2—6/3994 dated 28.4.2006, it is clarified that the registration of instruments of immovable property should be carried on as per provisions of Indian Registration CWP No. 11148 of 2006 [2] Act, 1908. However, genuineness of the power of attorney should be verified while registering the documents on the basis of Power of Attorney so as to check the veracity of documents and the parties concerned in order to prevent the fraudulent transactions and impersonations. This clarification relates to the registration of instrument of immovable property which are registered by the Registering Authorities on the basis of G.P.A. However, it is made clear that the present instructions do not relate to issuing of NOC about which the instructions dated 28.4.2006 will continue to apply.” Petition stands disposed of in terms thereof. (VIJENDER JAIN) CHIEF JUSTICE (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA) JUDGE 25.02.2008 'ravinder'