‘'‘ o “h, y. v : Rajam Dsem Wn Slni Haricharan Danssna, aga beut 54 ym ssistan Tsce R/o Village Chh ami! Dharamjaigm'h, Block Daramjaim'h, stn'ct aigarh CG). 1 ,. Sae of Chhattis, throu Secretary, Depaltment of ‘ ‘ Eductio DKS hawa RaiuHC). Deputy Director, Education, Dhammjigar Distric aigar (CG). 3. Digtrict ducation Ofcer, Raga‘, istrct Raigarh (CG)- R N) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agni!mtr§. .1} {WRIT PE'HTION UNDER ATICLE 226 OF THE CONS'HTI WON OF IDIA go irasoot : am y vo tho ttr. ’ ’ Shri Rakap}. Paode, Adcate for poiiono MISS S‘ta in, Panei Lawyer for hr: Sam/rondens. uni Ja 1 iespt asea o 13 d ofJu, 2663) \ith the onsent of the paities, te mattox' is taken p for heating W c h u finally. . Learned cunsel appearng for the pettioner submits that on 15.10.1997 o i i (nexr P/2), he suspension of ihe petitioner was rvoked with a Anue t e ondition that the pmen of saieiy and other allowances would be c ayt decide aley sposal the Cmiil ease ic was pending against d l di of iiia whh e eitioner. , t . Ciiminal case agait the petitionei', pending in‘tie ourt of Sessins ns l C o Judge, District Jashpur, was decided on 24.05.2007 {Annexure P/3), aoquitting the petitioner from all the charges levelled against him. Thereafter, the petitioner made a repiesentation on 15.02.2008 (Annexure 13/4) to consider his case for grant of payment of arrears for ‘ i r r.\ his suspension peiiod. . \ HIGH. mITRT OF FHHATT$§ARH AT R¥LASPUR rViit Petiiioii (3) No. 2923 0f2" 3 gw PETITIONER l'a an d a ea At ahr. al, T hg Di R ( VERSUS RESPQNDENTS 1 tt garh gh an; Bna pG ah, t Rh E ii ia11 Di ORAL ORDER (Fs n m ay ne th pt 3. The petitioner, after making a reprcsantation in Februaxy, 2008, has rushed to this Comt within three months. This petition is filed on 31 05.2008. In the normal course, where the representation is pending before the authorities, the petitioner ought to wait for some reasonable time. But, in View of the fact that pending representation has not been decided till date, it is expedient to direct the concerned authon'ty to consider and decide the repiesenta'tion of the petitioner dated 15.02.2008 (Annexme PM), in accordanee with imy without being influenced by the observations, if any, made hereinahove by this Court. Miss Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State, submits that the representation of the petitioner would be decided expeditiously. . In View of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of with above-stated l Aw ., on its own merit, direction. No order asto costs. 1 Sd/- 1 l Satish K. Agnihotri _ i 1 Judge l ' ikrte.