THE HON’BLE SRI BILAL NAZKI, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 1692 of 2005 25-10-2005 Between: V.Shourie Reddy .....APPELLANT AND The Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority, rep. by its Chairman. .....RESPONDENT THE HON'BLE SRI BILAL NAZKI, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 1692 of 2005 JUDGMENT : (Per Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, ACJ) The writ petitioner’s case was that a Sea Bunk was licensed to him at different intervals and the license was in subsistence when he was asked to vacate it for the purpose of road widening. After road widening, he again took possession of the Sea Bunk and is running it. But in the meantime, he was not being given water and power supply. The respondents took the stand that the license stood cancelled on 15.03.2005 and today also, the learned Advocate appearing for the respondents, had placed on record a copy of the order dated 15.03.2005, revoking the license. Since there is no license for the premises operative as on today, therefore, there is no question of restoration of water or power supply to the petitioner. We do not find any reason to interfere in the order passed by the learned Single Judge. However, it will be open for the petitioner-appellant to seek any remedies that may be available to him in law, to challenge the order of revocation of license, if so advised. Appeal is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________ (BILAL NAZKI, ACJ) 25th October 2005. _____________________ (R.SUBHASH REDDY, J) ajr