(-1-) hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1030 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1030 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1030 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus Sh. Bal KLrishnan D. Sanghavi & Ors. Respondents Mr. R. Ashokan with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant. Ms. Aarti Sathe for Respodents. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009 DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009 DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . We had adjourned the matter to enable the counsel for the assessee to find out whether in the subsequent years, the depreciation has been allowed. The learned counsel on instructions points out that in the subsequent years, depreciation has been allowed. By now the assessee has availed of the complete depreciation. The question framed remains purely academic. Consequently, appeal dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)