In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 1378 of 2008 Date of decision: May 18, 2009 Mohan Lal and others .. Petitioners Vs. Faiz Mohd. and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Ashok Khubbnar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate for the respondents No.1, 3, 4 & 5. Mr. A.K. Takkar, Advocate for the respondents No.6 & 7. A.N. Jindal, J The question whether the defendants/respondents were dispossessed during the pendency of the suit by the plaintiffs is a matter to be decided during trial after receiving evidence of both the parties on merits. The order of injunction cannot be treated as a conclusive evidence to determine the possession. As such, that cannot work as obstacle or embargo for filing a counter claim by the defendants. Resultantly, finding no merit in the petition the same is dismissed. May 18, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge