@mm gggxmg ' é ,1. // 1 // ‘ IN THE HIGH COURT OFJUDICATUREAT BILASPUR(CG) W. P. (S) No. SgVS /2009 VPETITIONER Raghuchandra Kare S/o Jatadhari Kare 'Age about 41 years, R/o MataRukmani KanyaAashram, Dimrapal, Jagdalpur (C.G. VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh / Through— Secretary, Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Bakward Class Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS /2. TheCommissioner, I Tribal Development Raipur (C.G.) K” 3, The Secretary, Mata Rukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, _ Dimrapal, Tah. & District-Jagdalpur(C.G.) ./ WRH‘PETITIONUNDERARI‘ICLESmOFI‘HE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5245 of2009 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ‘ SB‘ Hon’bie Shn Satlsh K. Agnihotn, J Shn S P Kale Advocate for the petmoner Smt Sm1ta Gha1 Panel Lawyer for the State ORDER ORAL (Passed on 14 day of September 2009) Heard leamed;counsel for the pames. 1. Learged counsel appearingfor the petitioner submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision ofthis Court rendered in Smt. A.Lall v. State of Chhattisgarh & Othersl, thus the petitioner may be permitted to make a ' , representation to decide his case in the light of aforestated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No. 3-Institute is a Government Aided school and the petitioner is a teacher within the sanctioned strength. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event the petitioner , makes a representation, the same will be considered and‘deeided, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks dam the date of receipt of / the representation. 3. In view of foregoing according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of./ Satlsh K Agmhot“ Judge i l y i I Sdl— 2 I I l 2007 (1) BLJ 265 r PETITIONER :‘ Raghuchandra Khare. VERSUS ‘ RESPONDENTS , State ofChhamsgarh & Others