THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.RVARMA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO TAKEN UP WRIT PETITION No.7937 of 2007 Dated:24.04.2007 Between: Reshma Begum …Petitioner And: The Station House Officer, Kachiguda Police Station, Hyderabad and another. …Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO TAKEN UP WRIT PETITION No.7937 of 2007 ORAL ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R.Varma) Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader, representing the learned Advocate General, appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is taken up on the basis of a letter dated 11.04.2007 addressed to the Hon’ble the Chief Justice, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, by one Reshma Begum, Resident of Moshin Colony, Shaheen Nagar, Hyderabad. 3. The grievance expressed by the said Reshma Begum in the said letter is that her husband by name Amjad Khan has been in illegal custody of Kachiguda Police, Hyderabad since 08.04.2007, and requested to do justice in the matter. 4. In response to the notice, issued by this Court, the first respondent-Inspector of Police, Kachiguda Police Station, Hyderabad, filed counter-affidavit. The facts of the case narrated therein are otherwise to that of the allegations made in the said telegram. So many other particulars have been furnished, which are not relevant for the present purpose. The Police after tracing the alleged detenu produced him before the Tahsildar, Saroornagar Mandal, where he stated that he was not detained by the Police personnel of either Kachiguda Police Station or any other Police Station and in fact, he went to Nanded of Maharashtra State without informing his wife and for the said reason, perhaps, his wife might have addressed the said letter to this Court. The said statement recorded by the Tahsildar is made part of the record. 5. In view of the said statement of the alleged detenu that he was not detained by the Police and that he has been moving freely, nothing remains for adjudication in the present writ petition and the same is liable to be closed. 6. In the result, the writ petition is closed, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. _______________ D.S.R.VARMA, J ______________ D.APPA RAO, J 24.04.2007 DR