1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.618 of 2010 The Supdt.Eng.P.W.Circle ..vs.. Mahadeo Gabhane and ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JUNE 14, 2010. Heard Mr.J.B.Jaiswal, A.G.P. for the petitioner and Mr.S.G.Jagtap, learned counsel for the respondents. The contention of the learned AGP is that wrong direction has been issued to bring respondent nos.1 and 2 on C.R.T.E. as muster clerk from December, 1982. He states that they have not worked for five years on said post before that date. With the assistance, I perused the judgment. There is a finding in paragraph no.8 in this respect and that finding is based upon perusal of orders Exhs.27,28,25 as also Exh.26. In their complaint itself these respondents have pointed out that they have worked as muster clerk from 24/12/1977 on wards. Advocate Shri Jagtap has pointed out that Clause 28 of Kalelkar Award does not require completion of 240 days continuously in preceding five years. This position is well settled. Respondent nos.1 and 2 had worked in preceding five years on the post of muster clerk. The 2 contention of the learned AGP about continuous service is not supported by law. No case for interference is made out. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. No costs. JUDGE chute