THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.7583 of 2011 ORDER: This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner – Accused No.1 seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.150 of 2011 of Osmania University Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 418, 420, 448, 506 and 511 read with 120-B IPC. 2. It is the case of the complainant that accused 1 and 2 are agreement holders of the lands situated at Kokapet Village, Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy District. A1 and A2 negotiated to sell the land of Ac.6.25 guntas of same village, to one K.Vijaya Bhaskar for a sum of Rs.26,50,00,000/-and received an amount of Rs.15,00,000/- subsequently, the said K.Vijaya Bhaskar, who is the brother-in-law of the complainant, dropped the transaction and went to abroad. Later, the complainant continued the transaction by paying the remaining amounts to the accused, in total the complainant paid Rs.1,10,00,000/- . Later, when the complainant insisted A1 and A2 for execution of registered sale deed and to receive the remaining sale consideration, they dragged the matter for one reason or other. On enquiry, the complainant came to know that the said land was already sold by A3 to A7, who are the real owners, to different persons on different dates. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the entire transaction is civil in nature, which took place between A1 and A2 and one K. Vijaya Bhaskar and the complainant is no way concerned with the transaction. If the complainant is having any grievance, he can file a suit by invoking the provisions under Civil Procedure Code. 4. This Court perused the records and heard the arguments. On reading of the complaint, it reveals that the petitioner Y.Sreeramulu along with P.Narayana Reddy received a sum of Rs.1,10,00,000/-, under the guise of paying the same to the real owners and get the plot registered in the name of the complainant. But, later they failed to do so and even after repeated demands of the complainant, they have not returned the money also. Hence, this Court is of the view that there is prima facie case against the petitioner herein. Hence, this Court is not inclined to stay the proceedings at this stage. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. The miscellaneous petitions, if any, filed along with the criminal petition shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 26th August 2011, Rns.