IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2008 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1930 W.P.(C).No. 11190 of 2008(F) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- P.V. MATHEW, PUTHIYAKULANGARA HOUSE, EDAVETTY P.O.,THODUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGEKUTTY MATHEW RESPONDENT: --------------- THE FEDERAL BANK LTD., REP. BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER,REGIONAL OFFICE THEKKUMKAL BUILDING, T.B. ROAD, KOTTAYAM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 11190 OF 2008 F ==================== Dated this the 2nd day of April, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that in response to Ext.P1 notice under Section 13 (2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, he has given Ext.P3 reply. One of the contentions urged by the petitioner is relying on Ext.P2 certificate issued by the Agricultural Officer to the effect that the property in question is an agricultural property and therefore Securitisation Act itself is inapplicable. Now that the petitioner has in response to Ext.P1 notice under Section 13(2) has given Ext.P3 reply, the Bank is obliged to consider the reply and pass orders thereon in view of Section 13(3)(A) of the Act. At this stage, I do not think the challenge against Ext.P1 should be entertained by this Court. Directing that the Bank shall decide on Ext.P1 in the light of Ext.P3 reply, this writ petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp