1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1544 of 2010 ( Ramchandra s/o Fulchand Chaudhary -: versus :- Rajesh s/o Nemkumar Porwal ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : APRIL 6, 2010. Heard Shri Gurve, learned Advocate for the petitioner/original defendant. The trial Court has granted temporary injunction to the respondent/plaintiff and protected his possession. The lower Appellate Court has dismissed the petitioner's Misc. Civil Appeal, finding that petitioner has already sold the property in question to third parties and placed those third parties in possession. This position is not in dispute. It is, therefore, apparent that no prejudice is caused by temporary injunction to the petitioner/original defendant. Mr. Gurve, learned Advocate informs that purchasers from petitioner have filed application for getting themselves impleaded and it has been allowed. He however states that matter should be expedited. 2 Liberty to petitioner/original defendant to move trial Court for expeditious disposal. If the parties agree with the trial Court, the trial Court may take up the matter expeditiously. With these observations, Writ Petition is disposed of. JUDGE adgokar