THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1613 of 2010 DATED: 15-09-2010 ORDER:- On the basis of a report given by P.W.1-P.Sarvotham, the Station House Officer, Nampally police station, Hyderabad registered a case in Cr.No.57 of 2005 against the petitioner herein for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 323 IPC and after investigation, charge sheet was filed and the same was taken on file by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Devarakoda and numbered as C.C.No.451 of 2005. 2. During the course of trial, apart from P.W.1, ten more witnesses were examined and Exs.P1 to P.13 were marked on behalf of the prosecution. No oral or documentary evidence on behalf of the defence. 3. Having analysed the said evidence, the trial Court came to the conclusion that the prosecution is able to establish the guilt of the petitioner herein and accordingly sentenced him to suffer simple imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs.3000/- for the offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for three months and to further undergo simple imprisonment for one year for the offence punishable under Section 323 IPC. He further observed that the said sentence shall run concurrently. Aggrieved thereby, petitioner herein filed Crl.A.No.36 of 2009 and the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District & Sessions Judge, Nalgonda, while concurring with the findings of the trial Court, dismissed the said appeal by judgment, dated 08-09-2010. Aggrieved thereby, the present revision is preferred by the petitioner herein. 4. Heard both sides. Perused the record. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly conceded that it not a case for indulgence, however requested this Court to take a lenient view. 6. As the alleged offence took place on 02-08-2005 and the petitioner had undergone a sentence of more than two weeks, this Court is of the view that a lenient view can be taken by reducing the said sentence to that of the period already undergone by him. Accordingly, the said sentence of simple imprisonment for one year on each count is reduced to that of the period already undergone by the petitioner. 7. Excepting the said modification, in all other aspects, this revision stands dismissed. ________________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 15th September 2010 TSY