IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1128 of 2007 BINOD SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 29.07.08. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order passed in Sessions Trial No. 436/339 of 1991/06. It appears that cogent reason has been assigned by the Addl. Sessions Judge, for acquittal of the accused persons. In this case neither I.O. nor the Doctor was examined. Even Post Mortem report was not brought on the record. . On perusal of para 4 of the judgment, it appears that earlier version of the prosecution case was also not brought on the record. The F.I.R. was lodged on subsequent statement of the informant. In view of above, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order passed in Sessions Trial No. 436/339 of 1991/06. Hence this application stands dismissed at admission stage. M. Pal. (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)