IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.VENKATESWARA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO :19537 of 2006 Dated: 23rd October 2006. Between: Smt. G.Jayamma W/o G.Kondaiah and another ..... PETITIONERS AND The Station House Officer (S.H.O.), I.D.A.., Bollaram, Jinnram Mandal, Medak District and another .....RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.VENKATESWARA REDDY W.P.NO.19537 OF 2006 ORAL ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice J.Chelameswar) This writ petition is filed with the prayer as follows: “ For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus ordering production of minors, Kumari G.Malleshwari, D/o G.Kondaiah and Kumari M. Sujatha, Daughter of M.Madhu, and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” The two petitioners complain in the writ petition that their daughters by names Kumari G.Malleshwari and Kumari M. Sujatha, who are minors are missing from 21st August 2006 and when they went to report the same to the local police- 1st respondent herein, complaint was not received, hence, the present writ petition. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, an additional affidavit is filed by the 1st respondent and the substance of the same is that both the missing minor girls, mentioned above, have since been returned and appeared before the police voluntarily on 01-10-2006 and 03-10-2006 respectively and complained to the police that each one of them were assured by Shaik Basha and Shaik Hameed respectively, that they would get married to these missing girls, eloped them away and subsequently, raped them. On the receipt of the abovementioned statements from the missing girls, on their return, the respondents altered the charges in the two cases, which are already registered as cases of girl missing in Crime Nos.82 of 2006 and 87 of 2006, respectively, to Sections 363 and 376 I.P.C., in each of the cases and the accused were produced before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Andole at Jogipet, Medak District on 04-10-2006 and both of them were remanded to judicial custody. The fact that the two missing girls returned home is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioners. In the circumstances, we do not see any reason to proceed further with the present writ petition. The writ petition, is, therefore closed at the stage of admission. ---------------------- J.Chelameswar, J -------------------------------- M.Venkateswara Reddy, J 23rd October, 2006. mrk