.10 1 '.' L V/rit Petition (S) PIg. TOOA of Iiiclra Dev Yadav S/ o Shri Saiitoshi Yadav Age about 42 years, Asstt. Teacher, Tribal Welfare, Priinaiy School, Chai-bhaiya, (Sanaa), Distt. - Jasnpur (C.G.) i^i^t^it State Govenim.ent of Cbliattisgarh Tbrougb - Secretan', Tribal & Educauon Depai'tcaent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipiu-(C.G.) Tribal Welfare Departm.ent, Distt. - •Jashpur (C.G.) ilock Education Officer, Bagicha, Distt. - Jashpur (C.G.) Treasun', Accounts 8s Peasion, Disti-ict - Jashpur (CG) 22.6 OF Shri Aiav Shrivastava, Couiisel for ftie petitioner. Shri Suiait Verma, Paael Lawyer lor the State on advance •py. C01,'?V f-Vff NIL Heard. Leanaed counsel for tlie petitioner submits that fhe issue ilivolved iii Uie case is as to whefher fhe petitloaer is entifled to regulai' pay scale w.e.f. the date of iaitial appouitnient or fi-oia tite date of coiupletion ofprobatioii pei-iod. He subiuits fliat the issiie iavolveci hereia was considered bv the Madhva Pradesh State Adiniiustt-ative Tribunal, Jabalpiir in O.A. No.2745/89 (Madhukaiit Yadu and 56 otliers Vs. State of M.P. and otners), wherein, it was lield fhat fhe similarly situated teachers ai'e entifled to regular pay scale w.e.f, ftie date of uiitial appoiiitiaent.. The iaatt.er was taken iip to tiie Hon'ble Supreine Court iu Special ^\ W.P. (S) No.7094/2007 vatti Leave Petitioii (Civil) No.6892/93. The said petition was disiaissed by the HonT^le SiipreDie Court iipholding fhe decision of tlie Tribunal to fhe effect tliat flie Teachers/Assistaat Teachers are entitled to regiilaT pay scale froia fhe date of iuitial appoiiltinent. Leamed counsel for tlie petitioner furftier subiuits tliat tliis Coiirt, while considering me sasie issue iii Rain Kuin?^- Saliu aiid otiiers Vs. State Govt. of CMiattisgai-h aiicl anotlier (W.P.(S; No.813 of 2007) by order dated 12.2.2007, has grarited regulai' pay scale w.e.f. me date ofiiutial appoiiitm.ent. Leamed counsel for tlie parties iointly subiuits tliat this case is squarely covered by me decision of tiiis Court. 111 tiie case of Ram Kum.ar Sahu and anofeer (supra). In view oftliat, tlds petition is allowed ia fhe sanie terms. However, tliis order shall be silbject to all venfications niacle. by fhe State regarding facts pleaded in Uie petiuoii.^.^- na^utftari ^llT«A6e