IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1180 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1180 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1180 OF 2008 Shri Navnath Rama Waghe. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Glady Pereira Mahindtar for the applicant. Ms.P.P.Shinde, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 29th April 2008. DATED: 29th April 2008. DATED: 29th April 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in connection with C.R.No.I-235/2007 registered with Kapurwadi Police Station, Thane for the offences punishable under sections 302, 324 read with section 34 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The prosecution case is that the complainant Mahesh Gujawere and deceased Mohd. Daud and Rajkumar Varma were serving as watchmen in Batata Company. On 8th June, 2007, at about 23.45 hours, when they were taking round in the campus of the company, they did not allow the applicant and other accused persons to carry the scrap and commit the theft of property. Therefore, all the accused including applicant assaulted both deceased and the complainant by means of iron pipe and iron tommy and stones because of which the deceased succumbed to the injuries. The F.I.R. was lodged by the complainant on 9th June, 2007. The applicant along with other accused came to be arrested on 10th June, 2007. 4. Learned A.P.P. has pointed out that the iron rod and stones were seized from the present applicant. The C.A. report is also against the applicant. It is, prima facie, established that the applicant was involved in commission of offence. The bail applications of the applicant were rejected by the Sessions Court on two occasions. 5. In the above view of the matter, no case is made out to take contrary view than the view taken by the Sessions Court. Application is, therefore, rejected. The observations made herein are prima facie. However, in the circumstance of the case, the trial be treated as expedited one. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE