c.\ ^..y*.^-" 3S^C: 5& Rani'h ^ 5 ^fi ^aSfl' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU.R-/C. G.) W.P.NO. £/<T7" / 2006 Petitioner Versus Respondents Satyendra Singh Aged about 43 years, S/o Late Parasnath Singh, Dispensery attendant (terminated) GovemmentAyurvedic Dispensery Kurra, Raipur, R/o Qr.No.1/9, Ayurvedic Colony behind Dental College, Raipur Dist : Raipur- (C.G.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department of Public Health, Indian Medical System and Homeopafhy, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) 2. The Director Directorate of Indian Medical System And Homeopathy, Near Mantralaya DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Dist : Raipur-(C.G.) 3. The District Ayurvedic Officer cum Superintendent, Dist : Raipur -(C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA v i%?5%. <f-^'''i ^^'^.'^ ^i^ -S§ ^ XI-HC-22 •s^ •^fraRFii'^ifli'yi'i, Ri'fli'My. sn^f^F' f'W'h 31RST 5tiHicn ^ifici '% 4^ r; H./- *)|IRW^t(fq> an^r''ra^?/ ^.ffl^i^l "WI. 200 f^^w 30-1.2006 copy. Shri Rakesh Anthonv, counsel foi Sb.nSandeep Dubey, G.A., forth Heard. . The present petition has been 17/9^004 (Annexure-P/14) passed by-r^ (• the petitioner. services of the petitioner have been terrr|inated. Learned counsel for the State rai^ed an objection to the effect that against the order of termination of tne competent autnonty. On the other hand, iearned coun|sei for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted the re^resentation (Annexure-P/15) dated 26/7/2005 before respondent no.1| un perusal ot the record, it appe preferred any appeai befqre the com|3etent authority against the order of termination. He however subrrjitted tne representation. The order of termination of service isappeaqble. The petitioner may prefer an termination of services before the com'pi alongwith a copy ofthis order and the a'eiay. If such an appeai is preferred, tlfie same shaii be considered and decided on its own merits in aecordince with iaw. of. With the aforesaid obseri/ations, f^iarl'ifiarl ^r^r\\f <ac* rior n ild< >u'»-»ltlU^/^f UU^/V a^l hf^el lUiCO. ^il^fd^'T TTWcflf^ 'f^T5t <f^^.l< ^? sipgii ai^r StateofC.G. on advanoe ied against the order dated •spondentno.3, wherebythe |en/ice, an appeai lies before rs ihat the petitioner has not ^ppeal against the order of stent authority, ifsoadvised, ippiication for condonatjon or |this petition stands disposed Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [«^R ••\. -••• ^sr