1 Appln 4595-10 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4595 OF 2010 Yasin Yakub Patel & ors ..Applicants V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.A.H.H.Ponda, Advocate, for the Applicants Mrs.Geeta Mulekar, APP, for the Respondent  State Mr.S.V.Marwadi with Mr.Shailesh Kantharia, Advocate, for the original Complainant CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 8TH OCTOBER, 2010 P.C. . This is an application for anticipatory bail by four persons, who are involved in C.R.No.315 of 2010 for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 326, 324, 323, 143, 144, 145, 147, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Oshiwara Police Station, Jogeshwari (W), Mumbai. According to the learned Counsel for the applicants, the applicants too had suffered injuries in the fight and they have also given report to the 2 Appln 4595-10 police. The learned Sessions Judge while rejecting the application for anticipatory bail has observed in para five of his order that there was some delay on the part of the applicants in recording the report. It has not been explained by them. Both the FIRs in C. R. Nos.315 of 2010 and 318 of 2010 are made available for my perusal. In both the FIRs, the date and time of receipt of information by the police is shown as 2 nd September, 2010 at 4.20 a.m. Crime against the present applicants was registered on 2 nd September, 2010 where that against the adversaries was registered on 4 th September, 2010. That cannot be equated to the delay in giving information to the police. 2. Considering role attributed to the applicants in the assault, it seems that applicant No.4 Aafaq Shabir Khan had used Sword which led to two contused lacerted wounds on Shabbir which were grievous in 3 Appln 4595-10 nature. Other applicants are alleged to have used iron rods. Injuries sustained by Sabbir Memon, Soheb Memon, Pawan Memon and Rizwan Shah are contused lacerated wounds. Given the nature of injuries sustained and the role attributed to the applicants, application of applicant No.4 is rejected. 3. The applicant Nos.1 to 3 be released on bail on their furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs. 25,000/- each with one or more solvent sureties in the like amount of Rs.25,000/- per person on the following conditions. (i) The applicants shall report at the Oshiwara Police Station, Jogeshwari (W), Mumbai for interrogation every day from 11 th October, 2010 at 10.00 a.m. for a period of next 15 days and thereafter, on every Sunday between 10.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. till the charge sheet is filed. (ii) The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (iii) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. 4 Appln 4595-10 4. The learned Counsel for the complainant requests that the applicants should be restrained from entering the area. The learned Counsel for the applicants states that the applicants are residing in that area. It is not possible to keep themselves away from that area. The applicants shall keep themselves away from the witnesses. 5. The order shall remain in force till the charge sheet is filed and thereafter, applicants may approach appropriate Court for regular bail. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)