1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUD ICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 477 OF 2010 Sunil Motiramji Mesare v. St. of Maharashtra . ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. P.S. Wathore Advocate (Appointed) for the Applicant. Mr. O.D.Kakde, APP, for Respondents. ...... CORAM : A.B.CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : APRIL 09, 2010. Counsel for the applicant fairly states that the charge- sheet has been filed in the competent court. According to him the applicant had no role to play. As a matter of fact, he was the Enquiry Officer who conducted the enquiry into the alleged misappropriation. Since charge-sheet has been filed, it is difficult for this Court to exercise power under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to find out what is the truth, even prima facie. Therefore, unless charge-sheet is perused and the entire evidence in the charge- sheet is considered even prima facie, it will not be possible to consider the request made by the learned counsel for the applicant. In view of the above facts and in view of filing of charge-sheet, it would be appropriate for the applicant to file application for discharge before the court where charge-sheet has been filed. Reserving liberty in favour of the applicant to apply to the trial court for discharge after filing of the charge-sheet, this application stands disposed of. JUDGE 2 /TA/