-:1:- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 132 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 132 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 132 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 717 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 717 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 717 OF 2008 Chhatrapati Nashik District Nagari Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. ... Applicant. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. Sudatta Patil i/b. Smita Gaidhani for Applicant. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. DATE DATE DATE : 30TH JULY, 2008. : 30TH JULY, 2008. : 30TH JULY, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . Heard learned Advocate. 2. There is delay of 130 days in filing the Criminal Appeal against the Judgment and Order of acquittal dated 6.9.2007 recorded by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Pimpalgaon (B), Nasik in Summary Case No.407 of 2007. 3. The matter revolves around issuance of cheque by the Respondent and taking action under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act by the Credit Society/Applicant. The Applicant nursed a bona-fide impression that the period of filing the appeal is 6 months and hence, the delay is caused. It is apparent that the delay in filing appeal is not deliberate and intentional. Hence, delay of 130 days condoned. (K.U. (K.U. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.)