SAS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.934 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.934 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.934 OF 2006 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.456 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.456 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.456 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Shetusha Engg. & Constructions P. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.B.M.Chatterji with Mrs.P.P.Bhosale for appellant. Ms. Nikite i/b. Dhru & Co. for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007. DATED : 1ST OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- There is a delay of 991 days in preferring the appeal. The I.T.A.T. order was received on 27/3/2003. The file was sent to the Ministry of Law on 27/6/2003. The draft of the appeal was received on 13/02/2006. There is no explanation whatsoever for the delay between 27/3/2003 and 13/2/2006. Considering the cause shown, the same would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence Motion is dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.)