C.W.P. No.10571 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.10571 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision.18.08.2011 Sh. Rama Shankar Yadav son of Sh. Raj Bali Yadav, resident of H.No.1151, Jammu Colony, Yamuna Nagar .....Petitioner Versus The Authorized Officer, Punjab National Bank, Saharanpur Road, Yamuna Nagar .....Respondent Present: Mr. Ravindra Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) C.M. No.9582 of 2011 Application is allowed. Writ petition is directed to be amended. Registry shall carry out the amendment. C.W.P. No.10571 of 2011 1. The writ petition challenges the sale undertaken under the SARFAESI Act under Rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. Against every decision taken for sale, there is a provision for appeal and this aspect has been dealt with by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Indian Overseas Bank Vs. Ashok Saw Mill 2009(8) SCC 366. All the contentions which are taken before this Court are permitted to be taken C.W.P. No.10571 of 2011 (O&M) -2- by the petitioner in an appropriate appeal and if there is any objection regarding the point of limitation, it is for the petitioner to convince the Tribunal about how the period of limitation is to be calculated and not taken it as a ground for challenge before this Court. 2. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 18, 2011 Pankaj*