(V ff c 6-" 1^<7. IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^fff, w.p.rs). No. /2010 PETITIONER Hafiz Mohammed, aged about 65 years, S/o Nabi Mohammed, retired Assistant Teacher, R/o Ward No. 12, Talapara, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ...-r^^ .\^f^\. --y" ^'^^y .7.1'<- " <"<- .-.c^' ,^^ <;-' /: 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Joint Director Treasury, Account & Pension, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer Block Bilha, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR WRTT PETmON (S) No. 1050 of2010 PETmONER : Hafiz Mohammed. VERSU8 RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CON8TITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Asmhotri, J. Present: Shri K.S.Pawar, Advocate fbrth^ petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer fbr the State/respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 12thdayof March, 2010) Wifh the consent ofleaiiied counsel appearing fbr the parties, the mattei' is heard fmally. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the case, being payment of retiral benefits matter, may be referred to Ihe pension committee. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandalv. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were invoh^ed. The Committee was constituted by the State Govemment, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006\Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar ¥s. State Governmentand others) aiid order dated 13.03.2008 passedin M.C.C. No. 105 of200S(State of Chhattisgarh & Others v. Baijnath Mandal and anor^r). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31 of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. •^ ^ 4642/2004 S^ynait^Wan^^^ by leamed counsel ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ a^ ^.-•"••-••••^''-'.\ '•• • • • •;•"..••.- 'f •\. ":' , "'"" ..... • 3. Wifh the c<»sentoflfa^ parties, 1lus petiti^^ of in fhe same tenns i;e. tlte office ofthe^A^ send fhe case to^ Conimittee, v^in a period of 15 days fromthe date of receipt of a copy of |&e petit^^f^ petitioner and this order. Thereait^ fhe Commi^ to /ttie petitioner and the offica^ coiio^i^y^Mjjt^^ 1:5 days. The id'onimittee shaU consid^iaiid^ss^ with law, after ^f&rding proper oppir^^ Tlie petilioner and the ^officers concemed^^^^m^ if necessary. The e^ire exerci^, mcludmg pay^ of rgtiral dues, if any, to the petitioner be compteted within a period offbur monfhs fi-om the date of receipt ofa copy ofthis order. 4. The petitioner shall supply extra copy of fhe petition to the leamed counsel appearing for the respondents for forwardmg the same to the Conimittee. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge