\ @ é «fgémh %§£:é\a£j IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT k WRIT PETITION BILASPUR (c1 No. £6>1$ > Izolo WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF THE INDIA PETITIONER Arun Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Radheshyam Agrawal, aged about f§\\n 46 years, R/o. ~ Seth Basant Lal F?uw‘w 3/?“ ...S.... v g..“w“ ‘1 "'f ¢ (CG) Marg, Ambikapur, ‘ Distt.- Surguja V Rasmgm da‘gd......." \Ya/g .. " ?’(’“ ' , VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State Transport Authority, __ . W. Raipuf (C.G.) 2. Secretary State' Transport Authority, Rajpur (C.G.) Gowri ,HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASP-UR V_VRIT PETITION (C) NO.2528 OF 2010 PETITIONER Arun Kumar Agrawaf Versus RESPONDENTS I State Transport Authority & Another (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- None for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panei Lawyer for the State. ORDER ORAL) (Passed on this 18th day of June, 2010) The matter is called forhearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. 2) ln View of the abovey the writ petition is dismissed 'for want of prosecution. 7 V Sd/— SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI Judge >&%:%,