IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 20TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 29TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 22042 of 2011(E) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- MUHAMMED ILLIAS @ M.M.ILLIAS, S/O.MUHAMMED SALI, SUDHEER MANZIL, ELAMPAZHANNOOR P.O., CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. K.SIJU SRI.A.MUHAMMED RAFFI SMT.BINDU GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM-691 013. 2. TAHSILDAR, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOTTARAKKARA-691 506. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, KADAKKAL-691 536. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.22042/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR LAND ASSIGNMENT DTD. 3.12.2007.. P2:- COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KADAKKAL DTD. 17.12.2007.. P2(a):- COPY OF THE MAHAZAR OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KADAKKAL DTD. 17.12.2007. P2(b):- COPY OF THE VERIFICATION REPORT OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KADAKKAL DTD. 17.12.2007. P3:- COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS FILE OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT REGARDING LA. NO.115/2007. P4:- COPY OF THE NOTICES DTD. 12.11.2008 AND THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE KADAKKAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH REGARDING PUBLICATION OF 12 (1) NOTICE. P5:- COPY OF THE LETTER OF CLARIFICATION SOUGHT BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 1.1.09. P5(a):- COPY OF THE REPLY SUBMITTED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER DTD. 13.8.2009. P6:- COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD. 19.8.09. P7:- COPY OF THE REMINDERS ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD. 30.4.2010. P7(a):- COPY OF THE REMINDERS ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD. 19.5.2010. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 22042 of 2011 E ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 20th day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ext.P1 is an application made by the petitioner before the second respondent for assignment of 02.80 Ares of land in Survey No.2/9 of Kadakkal village. According to the petitioner, on receipt of the application, which was made in December, 2007, the second respondent issued Ext.P6 letter to the third respondent, calling for a report. It is stated that despite reminders, the third respondent has not so far furnished its report to the second respondent as a result of which, Ext.P1 application is kept pending. It is complaining of the delay as above, this writ petition is filed. 2. If the facts are as stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, necessarily, inordinate delay has already been caused by the third respondent in furnishing his report pursuant to Ext.P6. Therefore, I direct the third respondent to furnish his report in pursuance to Ext.P6, as expeditiously W.P.(C) No.22042/2011 : 2 : as possible and at any rate, within four weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment and on receipt thereof, the second respondent shall pass orders on Ext.P1, at any rate, within eight weeks thereafter. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment and a copy of the writ petition before respondents 2 and 3 for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/20/09 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge