l-s-...-^l "o ^ ^ 1<?f Hon'ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar. JJ Dheer Sai KJndo, son of Shri Prem Sai H3ndo, aged about 36 years, working as Panchayat Karmi (Secretary), caste Uraon, residence of Bada Damali, Police Station Darima, Tahsii Ambikapur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh, 2. 3.. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Chief. Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Ambikapur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Lundra, District Sarguja, 5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Ambikapur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh Gram Panchayat Nan Damall, Janpad Panchayat Ambikapur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. Nashimuddin Palka, Janpad Panchayat Udaypur, Dlstrict Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. Icie 221 Shri C.J.K. Rao, counsel forthe petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate forthe State. Shri Sanjay Patel, counsel for respondent No. 2 and ,nd (Passed on 22"° March, 2011] \ ','.\ ^^ 2 Per Dhirendra Mishra. J:- (1) By She instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for fotlowing i.1 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pieased to issue an appropriate writ declaring the dause 8 of the above guidelines dated 29.08.08 in regard transfer of the Panchayat Karmis as ultravires unconstitutional and against the provisions .of the Panchayat (Recruitment and General Conditions of Services Ruies), 1999. 10.2 To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus quashinc the transfer order dated 25.06.2010 transferring the petitioner from Gram Panchayat Nandamali, Janpad Panchayat Ambikapur to Gram Panchayat Patora, Janpad Panchayat, Lundra. 10.3 To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or direction to the respondents authorities whereby allowing the petitioner to work in the present place of 10.4 To award the cost and expenses of this petition. i.5 To issue any other writ or directions or orders in favor of the petitioner and against the respondents upon these facts and in the circumstances of the case in the Interest ofjustice. •i (2) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the return filed by the respondent No. 4, it is evident that the petitioner has been permitted to work within the same Janpad Panchayat as per preference of the petitioner. In that view of the - matter, he does not want to. press the instant petition for other reliefs. (5) Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed. '/ijay Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge \ .\ V Sd/- ^ R.N. Chandrakar Judge