IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA THURSDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2010 / 28TH SRAVANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 4912 of 2010(F) ------------------------------------------ (CRIME NO.209/2010 OF PARIYARAM MEDICAL COLLEGE POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT) ................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.9: ------------------------------------------ MUHAMMED ANAS K.P., AGED 21 YEARS, S/O.SAIDUMUHAMMED, R/AT.KADAVATHEPEEDIKAYIL HOUSE, PARIYARAM AMSOM, KORAMPEEDIKA, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.HARISH. RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT AND STATE: ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE- REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, , HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, (CRIME NO.209 OF 2010 OF PARIYARAM MEDICAL COLLEGE, POLICE STATION), KANNUR DISTRICT. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZ. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/08/2010, ALONG WITH B.A. NO.4902/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. K.HEMA, J. ------------------ B.A. Nos. 4902 & 4912 of 2010 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of August, 2010 O R D E R Petitions for bail. 2. The alleged offences are under Sections 143, 147, 148, 452, 427, 379 and 506(i) read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution, on 30.05.2010 at about 2.30 a.m., petitioners(accused nos. 9 and 11 to 14) along with other accused formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and committed house trespass into the house of the de facto complainant and destroyed the windows and household articles by using weapons and caused loss to the de facto complainant. They also committed theft of 6 sovereigns of gold. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that accused no.9 was arrested on 25.06.2010 and accused nos.11 to 14 were arrested on 15.07.2010 and they are in custody for the past 55 days and 38 days respectively. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that accused no. 9 is involved in two more cases and he has no objection in granting bail, but stringent conditions may be imposed. B.A. Nos. 4902 & 4912 of 2010 2 5. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied that bail can be granted to petitioners on conditions. Hence the following order is passed: Petitioners shall be released on bail on their executing bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Magistrate Court concerned on the following conditions: i) Petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer on every Monday, Wednesday and Saturday, between 10 A.M. and 1 P.M. ii) Petitioners shall not enter the limits of the police station within which the crime is registered, except for compliance of condition no.1. iii) Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate any witness or tamper with the evidence. iv) In case, petitioners are involved in any similar offence, their bail is liable to be cancelled. These petitions are allowed. K. HEMA, JUDGE ln