IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.24742 of 2000 Between: Nehru Lal S/o.Balram R/o. 14-9-824 , Jumerat Bazar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad Tankbund Road, Hyderabad. 2 Assistant Town Planning Officer Circle No.3 , Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad Abids, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to to issue a Writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not allowing the petitioner to have additional FSI., proportionate to the effective area of 64 Sq.Yards under the road widening and not responding to the petitioners representation dt:24-11-2000 and trying to push the petitioner beyond the effected area as illegal un-Constitutional and Violative of Article 14,19,21 and 300A of the Constitution of India Consequently direct the respondent to grant proportionate FSI., in respect of Un-effected portion of premises No.3-5-1133 to 1136, admeasuring 54 Sq.Yards situated at Kacheguda X Roads , Hyderabad and also not to disturb the existing business of STD., ISD ,PCO., Fax being run by the petitioner under the unaffected portion and pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.V.N.BHUPAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.C.NARAYANA REDDY The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.24742 of 2000 ORDER: When the matter has been taken up for hearing on 20-06-2008, none appeared for the petitioner and as such, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption “for dismissal”. Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, neither learned counsel for the petitioner is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, the interim orders granted on 13-12-2002 and 29-03-2004 stand vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 11-07-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SRAVAN}