IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.27039 of 2006 Between: Mohd. Abdul Quddus Ghori, S/o. Mohd.Jamal Ghori, Adcoate, R/o.H.No.20-7-480/1, Taleem Mallad, Fath Darwaja, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director General and Inspector General Of Police, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Lakdi-ka-Pool,Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Hyderabad. 4 The Deputy Commissioner of Police, South Zone, Hyderabad. 5 The Station House Officer, Hussaini Alam Police Station, Hyderabad. 6 Ayub Khan@ Ayub, S/o. Jahangir Khan, R/o.17-47, Roda Ministry Nagar, Shapurnagar, Hyderabad. 7 Fiaz Mohammed @ Rustum Mohd.Khan, S/o. Gul Mohd. Khan, R/o.H.No.19-2-24/19/C/3, Alibagh, Kalapathar, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: None Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 5: AGP FOR HOME. None for R.6 & R.7. This Court made the following: ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondents 1 to 5 in arresting respondents 6 and 7 by executing the pending warrants against them in S.C.No.222 of 2003 on the file of the Principal Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Nampally, Hyderabad, as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that respondent No.6, who is A.1 in the said case, was arrested in connection with S.C.No.584 of 2001 and the Jail authorities have produced him before the Court in connection with S.C.No.222 of 2003 also. As regards respondent No.7, who is A.4 in the said case, the learned Assistant Government Pleader stated that he surrendered before the said Court and was enlarged on bail. She further stated that both the accused are attending the trial. Having regard to the above facts reported by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:03-7-2009 MNR