IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.15520-M of 2010 Date of Decision:19.1.2011 Sukhdev Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. B.S. Sewak, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to the respondents not to harass the petitioner unnecessarily. Reply by way of affidavit of Joginder Singh, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Jagraon, District Ludhiana (Rural), has been filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. It is submitted in the same that the son of the petitioner is found involved in case FIR No.30 dated 10.5.2010 under Sections 302/34 IPC at P.S. City Jagroan. It was only during investigation that raids were conducted to arrest the son of the petitioner but he could not bearrested and the house was locked. It is further submitted that the petitioner was never harassed by the local police. In view of the above, no further order is required to be passed. However, some serious allegations have been levelled by the petitioner against respondent No.3 in his petition. Accordingly, the petitioner and other lady members of the family shall not be harassed unnecessarily and no coercive method be used against them for the purpose of finding his son. Disposed of in the above terms. 19.1.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE