IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13154 of 2011 MD. RUSTAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 05.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report. It appears that in course of investigation, petitioner and other accused were arrested and they made their confessional statements before the police leading to recovery. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the recovered articles have not been put on Test Identification Parade and moreover, having similar allegation, one co-accused, namely, Md. Amjad has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 28.03.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 8959 of 2011. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-II, Naugachia at Bhagalpur in connection with Sessions Trial No. 198 of 2011 arising out of Bihpur (Bhawanipur) P.S. Case No. 294 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )