IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 7TH OCTOBER 2010 / 15TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 28817 of 2010(B) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- ELIAMMA, AGED 65 YEARS, D/O. T.DANIEL, G/5, THOTTAMATTAM, GANDHI NAGAR, PUDUPARIYARAM, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR OF INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, AND GENERAL MANAGER, DISTICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, PALAKKAD-1. 2. THE SENIOR CO-OP. INSPECTORS (HL), DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, PALAKKAD AND ARBITRATORS, APPOINTED U/S 70(4) (C) OF KERALA CO-OPERATIVE ACT. PALAKKAD-1. 3. THE PALAKKAD DISTRICT GOLD WORKERS INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO.C-IND(P) 133, PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT SHRI.PADMANABHAN. PALAKKAD-1. 4. THE ADMINISTRATOR, THE PALAKKAD DISTRICT GOLD WORKERS INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO.C-IND(P) 133, PALAKKAD-1. R1 & R2 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/10/2010, ALONG WITH WPC.NO.28818/2010 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SVS/ C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO.28817 & 28818 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of October, 2010 JUDGMENT When these matters are taken up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader, upon instructions, submitted that arbitration award has been passed in ARC.Nos. 2/2008 and 3/2008 on 28.9.2010. In fact, the former Writ Petition has been filed mainly with the prayer to issue a writ of mandamus commanding the second respondent to pass award in ARC 2/2008 and in the latter Writ Petition a similar prayer has been made to pass award in ARC 3/2008. Evidently, nothing survives for consideration in these Writ Petitions. The submissions made by the learned Government Pleader are recorded. However, it will be open to the petitioners to challenge the respective award in appropriate proceedings, in case, they are aggrieved by the same. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners were not communicated with the copy of the arbitration awards. In case the arbitration awards were not yet communicated to the petitioners, the same shall be communicated to them within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this W.P.(C) Nos.28817 & 28818 of 2010 2 judgment. Subject to the above observations, the Writ Petitions are closed. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) Nos.28817 & 28818 of 2010 3 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. JUDGMENT September, 2010 W.P.(C) Nos.28817 & 28818 of 2010 4