IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9727 of 2011 Sham Lal & another ...Petitioners Versus HMT Limited, Banglore & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr.Vishal Sodhi, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. This order will dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos.9727 of 2011 (Sham Lal & another Vs. HMT Limited Banglore & others) and 9855 of 2011 (Sudesh Kumar & others Vs. HMT Limited Banglore & others). The facts are being taken from CWP No.9727 of 2011. The petitioners have filed this writ petition with a grievance that the application for eviction under the Public Premises Act is being decided without giving any opportunity to the petitioners to file written statement or to lead any evidence. Petitioner No.1 was allotted House No.A-179 on lease hold basis by respondent-HMT. Lease was renewed from time to time. The policy of allotment has been continued, but it is stated that without any jurisdiction, the authorities have now refused to renew the lease. It is pleaded that there is no decision taken by the company to evict the petitioners from the premises. The petitioners have accordingly filed a civil suit challenging the notice of eviction on the ground that same is void and nullity under the eyes of law. Plea is that the order of eviction has been passed by unauthorised person. Civil Writ Petition No.9727 of 2011 :2: The civil suit is pending for 9.6.2011. In the meantime, the proceedings under the Public Premises Act have been initiated. The petitioners instead of seeking relief from the civil court have changed the track to file this writ petition. The petitioners cannot be permitted to have both the remedies by approaching the civil Court as well as the writ court. It would be appropriate for the petitioners to seek any relief from the civil court, which they have already approached. No case for interference, therefore, is made out. The writ petitions are dismissed. May 30, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE