C'f^-CyQ/ ^ IN THE HIGH GOURT OF JBegIGATURE AT BIIASPUR (CHHATTISGARHt WRITPETITION Nt». ^Mi /2005 PETITIOMER RESPOWDENTS <ox^^ f^sf •« <y UttamSingh Thakur , aged ^.bout 39 years S/o Shri Gambhir Sin^h Rajput, R/o Professor Colony, Kawardha, Penrianent Address Sector-6, Street 38 Q. No. 4 J Old Russian Btock, Bhilai Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS The State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Ministry of Home, Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur / Director General of Police Raipur Superintendent of Police Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTPI€^E226 AKI»^2?7OF THE CONSTITUTIOWCWIWiyiA XI-HC-22 sn^rqii f^ifesn^T SOHItl +|R(1 .^:. 3^ •<ll'i|l<1«,WTn'M'IS, RlOWy 3TI^?T^15|tb tfTOMl sn*iitn u? P' 2-?&rfoS' ra?'""'"""""-A-'w[ 200 o R|<)<A ^n^T^tili^ fli^r 8.7.2005 Petitioner by Shri Respondents/ State Lasvyer. Heari. Pa^-ag Kotecha, Advocate. |by Shri Vivke Sharma, Paael fitd The petitioner has and 227 of fhe Constitutibn dated 10.6.2005 whereby fhe petitioner back to Transport Departnient, he Dantewada fiuia Kawanihst Leamed counsel foil petitioner was appoiated a ra» scnt on deputation to the fiom 18.4.2003. On rei fhe petitioner had joined ) impugneddated 10.6.200i •=bwf<-l41-i HPRffff fS^S <R|«;|< ^si^Hsn^r ' tfais petttion itaderArticles 226 of India chaBenging the order |on repatriation of the semces of tjhte Hoiae Departmcnt from. fhe |has beeu directed to bc posted at fhe petitioner submits that the Constable at Kawardha, when he fTransport Department with efifect to fhe Hom.e Department |t Raipur fiom where by the order (Aanexure P/ l)^he Iias been sent :pa1|riation ('fl^^f^) XI-HC-22 sn^r^r I^IWSll^T sPIWHf^T 3^[ •<11<11<1<1, ®T(1u'|S,RlOI'My *11*1WI stifrai 3ii3i?i<<a,ch ^-?-S5-7 t>5' Wi; 200 ^s 3n^IS«11W;HfeT - •2.- to fhe Distnct Force in Dantewada. Leamed counsel for tt(e petitnner furfher subniits fhat fhe petitioner chatlcnges ^iis transfer to Daatewada Le. naxalite affected area becau^e as per the poUey ofthe Govt. a constable can be considerejl for transfer only after he has naxalite aEfected area. spent 15 years of service iu Wifh regard to fh^ Dantewala, it was sybmj.1 origuiatplaceofposfmg is he was working before Departmeat aad no teansfet area to other naxaUte area the State Govfc i.e. a Const^bte one na?catite area. In view offhe dispute( am of fhe opuuon fhat this | fhe liberty to fhe peti.tioner| authority concemed within| <til<<t<n<fli IffRTT ^ fe^t' <Rl«l< ^aTl^iTsn^r the naxaMte affected district traasfer finm Kawardha to |ted by the pctitioner fhat the also a vascsSte affeeted areawhere deputation to fhe Transport caa be xnade frovs. one DaxalitB ^rifhout considering fhe poUcy of has to work onty 15 years in. &.cte involved ia fhis petition, I pctition can tic disposed ofwifh to make a representation to fhe a period of 15 days fiom today ('ft^y^) XI-HC-22 sn^i^i ^rwsn^r aiHi'n vf^S .- f \ /-*" s&^ 11^ 3^'?siraRra', OTll+i'ls, Rieit'tfy •niioirg>*(T« 3llSi^l<45|< '2-S^^joS' ^: V^ 200 R<)^ 30^T 8WIIW df^tT -3 raisu^; att tus grievaaces fited by the petitiouer, thc and decide fhe case of afad on such representation being atifhorilyconccmed shaU consider transfer of fhe petitioner in accordanee with law and Ijhe poUcy fi-amed ia fhis regard, iaon<h fl?oia fhe date ofsubinission of wittun a period of oue the representation by the transfer to Dantewada wiU tretitioner. However, the order of not be given cffect to tiU the by fhe authority conccmed. offinalty. q>i<<Id<ll-l imcil ff fe1^ <Ri«i< ^'Slf^ITSn^T representation is decidcd| Otdcred accordit^ty. In view offhe foregoijig, this pctitionstands dispose'd Sd/- '': . SatishK.Agnibotn Judge (<fl^y@^) w il