1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.278 OF 2011 in WRIT PETITION NO.4293/2011 1) Bhanudas Sena Pimparkar and others. - PETITIONERS VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra and others. - RESPONDENTS ***** Mr.P.N.Kutti, Advocate for Petitioners. ----- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 14th NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : 1) Heard Mr.Kutti. Perused the order of learned Deputy Registrar (Admn) & Taxing Officer dated 3rd August, 2011. Also perused the prayers in the writ petition. 2) Basically, the owners are 12 writ petitioners and since two of the writ petitioners expired, the legal representatives stepped in the shoes of such claimants/petitioners. These legal representatives will not be exceeding their claims and contentions beyond the claim of 2 individual such petitioner, who are since expired. Consequently, the amount of Rs. 2,750/-, as court fees, was reasonable and legally sought to be paid by Mr.Kutti than Rs. 4,750/-. To repeat, the legal representatives have no overriding rights in equation to other two petitioners. They are claiming and restricting their rights for the deceased claimants and nothing more. In the result, the objection raised by the Taxing Officer is set aside. 3) Civil Revision Application allowed as above. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/