IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.715 of 2011 AJIT YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 28.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State. Although, petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. of Barbigha P.S. Case No.170 of 2010 nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession, but in course of investigation one injured, namely, Sunil Kumar has claimed to have identified the petitioner and also disclosed the role played by the petitioner while committing the alleged occurrence. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I do not feel it to proper to release the petitioner on bail, accordingly, the prayer for bail stands rejected. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)