VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No.886 OF 2008 Niranjankumar Laxman Upadhye & Ors. Petitioner Vs. Rohini Niranjankumar Upadhye & Anr. Respondents Mr. R. G. Bhat i/b Smt. Lata Wadhwani, for Petitioner. Mr. A. G. Pandit, for the Respondent No.1. Mrs. A. S. Pai, for the respondent No.2. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI, AND A. P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE : MAY 5, 2008. PC :- . Petitioners have filed this petition for quashing of the FIR No. 251/2005 registered with Navghar Police Station against them, lodged by the respondent No.1, under section 498-A, 406, 509, read with section 34 of Indian Penal Code. Charge-sheet was also filed. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that case was registered as a result of matrimonial discord between petitioner No.1 and the respondent No.1, and since they have now settled the issues, charge-sheet should be quashed. On the - 2 - last date of hearing we had insisted that respondent No.1 shall remain present in the court. She is present in the court. She has been identified by her counsel. She has filed her affidavit, setting out therein that they have settled the issues in between themselves. Relying upon the decision in the case of B.S. B.S. B.S. Joshi and Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Anr.[ Joshi and Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Anr.[ Joshi and Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Anr.[ (2003)4 (2003)4 (2003)4 Supreme Court Cases 675 ] Supreme Court Cases 675 ] Supreme Court Cases 675 ] we quash the proceedings as the parties have compromised the matter. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Sd/- [ BILAL NAZKI, J. ] Sd/- [ A. P.BHANGALE, J.]