HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No. 8985 OF 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the first respondent in failing to prevent the second respondent from making illegal and unauthorized construction in premises bearing No.1-14-23/3 to 23/5, Lothukunta Alwal Village, Secunderabad-15, despite having submitted representations on 28.01.2010 and 07.04.2010. There is an inter se dispute between the petitioner and the second respondent which is not the subject matter for adjudication in this writ petition. The only question which arises for consideration is whether the construction being made by the second respondent is in accordance with the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955, the rules and the building bye-laws made thereunder. Since the petitioner has submitted representations on 28.01.2010 and 07.04.2010 alleging construction by the second respondent contrary to law and without approval of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, I consider it appropriate to direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s representations 28.01.2010 and 07.04.2010 and, if the construction being made by the second respondent is found to be illegal/unauthorized, take further action in accordance with law including putting the second respondent on notice and giving him an opportunity of being heard. The first respondent shall communicate its decision to the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. However, in the circumstances, without costs. RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J Date:13.04.2010 Note:Furnish copy within one week bo Usd