IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 13674 of 2008. Decided on 23rd December, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Naginder Pal Sharma, son of Sh. Vishwa Nath Sharma, resident of Old Bus Stand, Bhojpur, Tehsil Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P. …Petitioner. -Versus- 1. State of Himachal Pradesh through Principal Secretary (Urban Local Bodies) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-2. 2. The Director, Urban Development, H.P., Shimla-2. 3. Municipal Council, Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P., through Executive Officer. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2 : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent No. 3. : Mr. Pritam Singh, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Dilip Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present lis is covered by the principles laid down by this Court in Dayalu Ram Versus The State of H.P. and others, CWP(T) No. 2240 of 2008, decided on 07.04.2009. In the present case, the petitioner is working as a Library Attendant and in Dayalu Ram’s case, Shri Dayalu Ram was working as Librarian. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner strictly in view of the principles laid down in the judgment, cited 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - hereinabove, within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment before the second respondent by the petitioner. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 23, 2011. (bhupender)