1 S.B. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.64/2005 Anand Krishna Lohra Vs. Shri Shiv Kumar Sharma & Anr. Date : 8.9.2006 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BALIA Mr. P.K. Lohra for the petitioner. Mr. K.L. Thakur, Addl. Advocate General. ________ Heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the fact that the petitioner has been approved for appointment as a Junior Engineer w.e.f. 9th August, 1995. A regular post of Junior Engineer was created and the petitioner has been paid emoluments of the post in regular pay scale with effect from that date. The directions contained in order dated 3.8.2004 deciding S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4969/93 stand complied with. Shri P.K. Lohra, learned counsel for the applicant states that the consequential benefits of such regular appointment as accruing from time to time for example release of first selection scale on completion of 2 9 years service and place in seniority have not been assigned. However, these are the matters which are not the part of the directions contained in order dated 3.8.2004. Therefore, this contempt petition cannot be used as a vehicle for deciding those issues. For such grievances, the petitioner may approach the appropriate authorities for redressal and may pursue his remedy as may be otherwise available under the law. In the facts and circumstances stated above, this contempt petition cannot be continued. The notices are accordingly discharged. [ RAJESH BALIA ], J. babulal/