hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3056 OF 2005 Shri. P.S. Ghadigaonkar ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr.Yogendra Pendse for Petitioner. Mr. P.M. Palshikar for R. Nos. 1 to 3. Mr.B.J. Sawant for R. No. 4. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: DECEMBER 12, 2006 DATED: DECEMBER 12, 2006 DATED: DECEMBER 12, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Rule. Heard forthwith. . The contention of the Petitioner is that though there is a certificate issued in his favour for recovery, the Respondent State Authorities till date have not executed the certificate. . Considering the above, the Petitioners are directed to give list of properties which according to Petitioner are of the ownership of Respondent No. 4 to Respondent No. 2 within the period of two weeks from today. On such application, Respondent No. 2 to take steps to effect the recovery within eight weeks thereafter. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)