IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15386 of 2011 Sahdev Mahto, S/O Late Parmeshwar Mahto, R/O Vill. Khadiyahi, P.S. Vibhutipur, Distt. Samastipur. . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Dy. Development Commissioner, Samastipur. 3. The Block Development Officer -Bibhutipur, Distt. Samastipur. 4. The officer-in-charge, Bibhutipur police station, District-Samastipur. . . . . . Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2/ 28.09.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the Officer-in-charge, Bibhutipur as respondent no.4. The petitioner, who is a P.D.S. dealer within Bibhutipur Block in the district of Samastipur, prays for quashing Memo nos. 3021 and 3024 dated 09.08.2010 issued under the signature of Block Development Officer, Bibhutipur, Samastipur, whereby he has been directed to refund Rs.3,76,639/- and Rs.7,60,773/- towards the value undistributed rice under SGRY Scheme and Food for Work Scheme. The petitioner disputes the quantity of rice allotted to him. According to the petitioner, he lifted 1183.21 quintals of rice and distributed 783.75 quintals of rice under SGRY Scheme. Similarly, the petitioner lifted 1182.27 quintals of rice and distributed 637.56 quintals of rice under Food for Work Scheme. The petitioner, thus, submits that at most 399.46 quintals of rice under SGRY Scheme and 544.71 quintals of rice under Food for Work Scheme would remain undistributed with him. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order 2 dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would either deposit 15% of the value of undistributed rice to the tune of 944 quintals at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within six weeks from today. The representation of the petitioner would be disposed of within a further period of 10 weeks. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)