IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2008 / 28TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 34153 of 2007(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- SMT. VIJAYAMMA.P., REP. BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SADANANDAN.P., 'VIJAYA VILASAM', ARUVIPURAM P.O., NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.PRAVEEN KUMAR RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR(RR), KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR(RR), KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, ERNAKULAM. ADDL.R4. THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, COMMISSIONARATE OF REVENUE, TRIVANDRUM (IMPLEADED AS ADDL.R4 AS PER ORDER IN IA NO.456/08 DT.18/01/08) BY ADV. SRI.M.M.SAYED MUHAMMED, SC, KFC GOVT.PLEADER SRI.M.R.SABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2008, HE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 34153 OF 2007 N ===================== Dated this the 18th day of January, 2008 J U D G M E N T The writ petitioner was the successful bidder in a sale conducted by the 1st respondent. The prayer in this writ petition is to direct the respondent to register the sale documents in favour of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. 2. On instructions, it was pointed out by the respondents that the sale certificate was issued as early as on 20th of April, 1995 and that a sale deed can be executed at this distance of time only with the concurrence of the Land Revenue Commissioner. 3. In view of the position as above, petitioner filed IA 842/08 and the additional 4th respondent was also impleaded. Since the concurrence of additional 4th respondent is required for execution of the sale deed, requesting for such concurrence, the WPC 34153/07 :2 : petitioner is seen to have submitted Ext.P5 representation before him and that representation also has been produced by the petitioner along with IA 842/08. Now that the competent authority for granting concurrence is the additional 4th respondent and the petitioner has filed an application as stated above, I dispose of this writ petition directing the additional 4th respondent, before whom Ext.P5 is seen to have given, shall consider Ext.P5 and pass orders thereon as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 4th respondent along with a copy of this writ petition and exhibits for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp