IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2007 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1929 W.P.(C).No. 34576 of 2007(N) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- VIDYA KRISHNAN, PROPRIETRIX, JANCO CRUSHER UNIT, MUDIYOORKONAM, PANDALAM, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTIRCT. BY ADV. SRI.ARIKKAT VIJAYAN MENON RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER(AA), PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER(APPEALS), DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOLLAM. 3. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR(RR), TALUK OFFICE, ADOOR. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =================== W.P.(C)NO. 34576 OF 2007 N =================== Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2007 J U D G M E N T It is evident from Ext.P7 posting notice that the appeal was posted to 8/10/07. The counsel for the petitioner submits that hearing concluded on that day itself and orders of 2nd respondent are awaited. It is in the meanwhile, revenue recovery proceedings have been initiated by Exts.P8 and P9 and hence this writ petition. 2. Now that the appeal itself has been heard and orders are reserved by the 2nd respondent, I direct that further proceedings pursuant to Exts. P8 and P9 revenue recovery notices shall be deferred for six weeks and there will be a further direction to the 2nd respondent to pass orders on Exts. P3 and P4 appeals, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of four weeks of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp