IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2007 / 14TH JYAISHTA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 343 of 2007(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST ORDER IN OP.18698/1998 DATED 13.02.2006 .................... PETITIONER/5TH RESPONDENT IN THE O.P.: ------------------------------------------------------------------ B. SREEKUMARAN NAIR, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.BALAKRISHNAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT :MEKKAVILA VEEDU, NARAYAMUTTOM P.O., TRIVANDRUM, WORKING AS HEADMASTER, PULIMATH U.P.SCHOOL, PULIMATH P.O., KILIMANOOR, TRIVANDRUM,(ADDRESS WORNGLY SHOWN IN THE O.P. B.SREEKUMARAN NAIR,INDIRA SADAN T.C.3/1613, KESAVADASAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.) BY ADV. SRI.R.RENJITH RESPONDENT/IST PETITIONER IN THE O.P: ------------------------------------------------------------------ M. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, AGED 72 YEARS, S/O. MADHAVAKURUP, EDUCATIOANL AGENCY AND MANAGER, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, PULIMATH, KILIMANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATIFF THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L. DATTU, C.J. & K.T. SANKARAN, J. ................................................................................... CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) No. 343 OF 2007 ................................................................................... Dated this the 4th June, 2007 J U D G M E N T H.L. Dattu, C.J.: This court by order dated 13.02.2006 in O.P.No. 18698 of 1998 had directed the respondent herein/1st petitioner in the Original Petition, to finalise the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner herein/5th respondent in the Original Petition, within a time frame. Alleging that said direction in the aforesaid Original Petition, has not been complied with by the respondent, the petitioner herein has filed this Contempt case, inter alia requesting us to initiate appropriate proceedings for the so called wilful and deliberate disobedience of the orders and directions issued by this court, by the respondent. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent herein would submit that the respondent, after holding appropriate disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner herein has passed an order exonerating the petitioner herein/5th respondent in the Original Petition from the charges. 3. Having gone through the pleadings and averments made by the counsel CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) No. 343 OF 2007 2 for the respondent herein, we are of the opinion that there is sufficient compliance of the orders and directions issued by this court . In view of the above, no further proceedings against the respondent need be proceeded. Therefore, the proceedings are dropped. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE. lk