1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4581 OF 2008 in FIRST APPEAL (st.) NO. 16090 OF 2009 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4583 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 16091 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4818 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 17324 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION O. 5331 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPAL NO. 17325 OF 2008 CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 1st October, 2009. P.C. 1. Two appeals are filed with two applications for condonation of delay by appellant Bhagirath Somani and two appeals with 2 applications for condonation of delay are filed by Rameshchandra Soni. The appellant in one group is respondent No.1 in another group. In all these matters, respondent No.2 Omkar Builders could not be served and the bailiff affixed notice on the conspicuous place of the last known address of respondent No.2 under Order V 2 Rule 17 C.P.C. For the purposes of these applications, service is treated as proper. 2. The learned Counsel for both the parties have no objection for condonation of delay in the rival group of appeals. Therefore, all these Applications are allowed. Delay in filing the First Appeals are condoned. 3. Appeals be registered subject to other office objections, if any and after registration, the matter be listed for admission after vacation. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)