IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41465 of 2010 SUDHIR KUMAR, son of Sri Ram Balak Saw Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/- 21.12.2010 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. 2. Petitioner is an accused for offences punishable under sections 406 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. It is alleged that two persons hired Scorpio vehicle and took it away with its driver whereafter some other persons also entered the vehicle, tied the hands and legs of the driver and went away with the vehicle. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither the petitioner is named in the First Information Report nor he was recognized by the informant during Test Identification parade. He avers that petitioner has clean antecedents. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that petitioner has been implicated on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused which has no value in the eyes of law, specially when he has been implicated due to some enmity. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances 2 aforementioned, petitioner named above is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh in connection with Barh P. S. Case No.222 of 2010. Ashwini/- (S. N. Hussain, J. )