1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6044 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 5646 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Latur ...Appellant VERSUS Dnyaneshwar Dadarao Salve ...Respondent ..... Shri D.V.Tele, A.G.P. for the applicant/appellant ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 8th December, 2009 PER COURT : 1 Perused. Heard learned A.G.P. for the applicant. None for the respondents/non-applicant-original claimant in spite of service. 2 The applicant has preferred the present application for condonation of delay of 3640 days caused in filing the accompanying First Appeal, challenging the judgment and award 2 dated 31.12.1994 passed by learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur in L.A.R. No. 753 of 1990. 3 On perusal of the averments in the present application and after considering the submissions advanced by learned A.G.P., it appears that the applicant has explained the reasons for delay caused in filing the accompanying First Appeal in para nos. 3 to 5 thereof satisfactorily. Hence it appears that the delay occurred in filing the accompanying First Appeal is not deliberate, willful or intentional and, therefore, same is required to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' ’ thereof and delay of 3640 days caused in filing the accompanying First Appeal stands condoned. Accompanying First Appeal be registered and numbered accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) dbm/ca6044.05