Ladda 1 wp-3193-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No. 3193 of 2010 Sitaram Sudama Gupta ...Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors ...Respondents None for the Petitioner. Mr A.S.Gadkari, A.P.P. for the State. Mr K.S.Patil, advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM:­ A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:­ 23rd February, 2011. P.C. 1. None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called out. 2. Learned A.P.P. submits, on instructions, that on the basis of F.I.R. No.I­399/2010 registered in the office of Respondent no.3, investigation was proceeded and on completion of investigation police report has been filed under Section 173 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the appropriate Court. In that view of the matter, question of considering relief for quashing of F.I.R. does not arise. Perhaps for that Ladda 2 wp-3193-10 reason, no appearance is made on behalf of the Petitioner. Hence, we place on record that the concerned Police Officer is present in the Court to instruct the learned A.P.P. 3. Petition is dismissed for non­prosecution. (A.R.JOSHI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)