IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27285 of 2010 1. MD. MANSOOR ALAM 2. BIBI NASIMA KHATOON Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----- 04. 23.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Torture for demand followed by another marriage is the allegation. Submission of the learned counsel for petitioners is that marriage is fifteen (15) years ago, second marriage is also more than seven (7) years earlier. No occasion ever arose to make the demand rather 42 decimals of land existing in name of petitioner’s father was transferred in complainant’s favour proved not to her satisfaction. Differences may be there in between both the ‘Shautan’, but never constituting an offence under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code for refusal of anticipatory bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Complaint Case No.3448C of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)