IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No.24762 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision : 29.11.2011 Smt.Ramkali ....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana ....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr.Deepender Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Man Mohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.85 dated 19.09.2010 registered under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC, at Police Station Baund Kalan. On 29.08.2011, the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel has argued that the allegations are against the husband and not against the petitioner, who is the mother-in-law and she has been in custody since 27.11.2010.” Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions of Sub Inspector Surjit Singh, has accepted the period of incarceration of the petitioner but has denied the assertion that there are no allegation against her. Criminal Misc.No.24762 of 2011(O&M) -2- Be that as it may, in view of the period of incarceration, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner. Bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI) November 29, 2011 JUDGE mamta