IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3861 of 2010. Decided on 20.9.2010 Shiv Adarsh Education Society ….Petitioner Versus Directorate General of Employment & Training and another. …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Tarlok Chauhan, Advocate. For respondents : Mr. Ajeet Saklani, learned Assistant Assistant Solicitor General of India, for respondent No. 1 Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate for respondent No. 2. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petition has been filed with the following prayers:- (i) That the respondents be directed to re-inspect the institute of the petitioner-Society immediately and thereafter to grant approval and affiliation and further permit it to start five courses for the academic session 2010-2011.” 2. Learned Assistant Solicitor General of India submits that the requirements do not contemplate a second inspection in one session. As far as the petitioner Institute is concerned, the inspection in the session has already been conducted and hence fresh inspection can be conducted in the next session. It is the vehement contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner that in all the inspections conducted so far, the Inspection Committee has been pointing fresh deficiencies. Be that as it may, it is submitted that all the deficiencies pointed out, have been removed. Therefore, as a special case, there will be a direction to conduct a fresh inspection so that the petitioner may have the courses this year itself. Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, referred to in more details in the writ petition, we are of the view that in the interest of justice and interest of the children waiting for the courses, it is only appropriate that a fresh inspection by the Standing Inspection Committee is conducted without delay, so that in case the petitioner has complied with the requirements, the application can be processed for permission. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to arrange for a fresh inspection, as a special case, within two weeks and depending on the outcome of the inspection, as above, appropriate action shall be taken in the matter of permission/affiliation for conducting the courses, applied by the petitioner, within another two weeks. The petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. September 20, 2010. (Justice Kuldip Singh), (HL) Judge.