CRM-M No. 32257 of 2011 **** Balbir Singh v. State of Punjab Present: Mr. Suveer Sheokand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Gill, DAG, Punjab. **** This is a petition for regular bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 109 dated 17.05.2011, under Sections 302/506/34 IPC which when presenting the challan changed to 304/34/506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sahnewal, Ludhina. At the very outset learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the mention of Section 304 IPC in the last order was inadvertently wrongly made since the challan was actually presented under Section 304 IPC but subsequently charge was framed under Section 302 IPC. Be that as it may, on 21.10.2011, the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner states that even the injury which attracted Section 304 IPC was not caused by the petitioner and that the petitioner has now been in custody since 17.05.2011.” Learned DAG, on instructions from ASI Kashmira Singh, has accepted that there was only one injury on the deceased and that was attributed to Harbir Singh, co-accused who is in custody. It cannot be lost sight of that the petitioner was the father-in-law of the deceased. In these circumstances, considering the period of his incarceration and the fact that no injury is alleged to have been caused by him, I deem it appropriate to grant him the concession of bail. CRM-M No. 32257 of 2011 -2- Bail to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE November 30, 2011 sunita