IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.24599-M of 2010 Date of Decision:23.9.2010 Baldev Raj .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. H.S. Batth, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Advocate for Manoj Dhamija-injured person. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The present petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 99 dated 25.4.2010 registered under Sections 307/34 IPC at Police Station Division 8, Jalandhar, District Jalandhar. As per the allegation in the FIR, both the petitioner and Manoj Dhamija were attacked by two unidentified peoples. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the injured-Manoj Dhamija has brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner did not receive any injury whereas Manoj Dhamija received as many as 11 injuries. It is further stated that the entire action and incident was planned by the present petitioner as he wanted to get rid of Manoj Dhamija in order to marry his cousin. Thus, the petitioner is rather the main accused. The matter needs investigation. The offence is under Section 307 IPC and the identity of two other assailants has to be ascertained. Accordingly, concession of anticipatory bail cannot be extended. Dismissed. 23.9.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE