S675.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 675 OF 2010 Sudha @ Sushma Suresh Narwekar ...Plaintiff. Vs. Iris C. Fernandes & Ors. ...Defendants. Mr. Makarand Narvekar i/by Mr. Jay Bhatia for the Plaintiff. Mr. Jaydeep Mitra with Mr. Prem Gidwani for Defendant Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Satyen Vaishnawa for Defendant Nos. 5 to 7. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 11TH MARCH, 2010. P.C.- 1 The parties have settled the matter out of the Court and accordingly executed consent terms dated 11/03/2010 signed by Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 and the Plaintiff. It is also counter signed by the advocate for the Plaintiff and the advocate for Defendant Nos. 1 and 2. The statement is made that Defendant Nos. 3 and 4 are out of India. Defendant Nos.1 and 2 are present in the Court. They have no objection of this consent terms be proceeded further. Plaintiff No.2 is present in the Court who has signed for himself and for Plaintiff no.1. 2 There is no objection with regard to the signatures, identity and authorization of any kind. The statement is made that no third S675.10 2 person/party will be affected by this consent terms and the consent terms are well within the framework of law and the record. 3 The parties have agreed for undertaking of clause (6). It is accordingly accepted. The refund of Court fee, if any, in accordance with law. 4 The present suit is accordingly disposed of, in view of the consent terms. 5 In view of this consent terms, the Notice of Motion is also disposed of. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)