IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8892 of 2011 ARVIND RAVIDAS & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 08.04.2011 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 326, 307, 504, 452, 384/34 of the I.P.C. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that for the same occurrence the police case was registered on 01.04.2010 in which petitioners are on bail and thereafter the present complaint was lodged. It is submitted by learned counsel for the complainant that petitioners filed a bail application by appearing before the learned Court below but subsequently they withdrew it from the Court of learned Magistrate. No order has been produced on record that learned Magistrate has passed any order on the appearance application of the petitioners. In that view of the matter, the contention of the complainant is not tenable. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners namely 1. Arvind Ravidas 2. Madhuri Devi 3. Binesh Ram 4. Shilla Devi 5. Braham Ram 6. Kamali Devi 7. Birendar Ravidas @ Birendra Ram 8. Gangia Devi 9. Rinku Devi, in the event of their arrest or surrender 2 before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 564 of 2010. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)