1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.818 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5365 OF 2011.(D) Shailesh Bhojraj Rathod. .Vrs. The State of Maharashtra,thr. Its Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Mantralaya,Mumbai and others. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. (Mr. A. A. Kathane, Advocate for applicant. Mr. Fulzele, Addl. Government Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.) -0-0- CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & A. P. BHANGALE, J J. DATED : 30 th August, 2011. This Court has dismissed the Writ Petition No. 5365 of 2010 by noticing relevant facts and also after noting that the school of which leaving certificate was produced was itself closed in 1970 and hence there was no question of receipt of document pertaining to the father of the petitioner in the year 1988. Now review sought is on the basis of Kotwal Panji which allegedly records the date of birth of grand father of the petitioner. In the said Kotwal Panji the caste of the petitioner's grandfather is shown as 'Rajput-Bhamta'. Said certified copy is claimed to have been received by the petitioner on 22/06/2009. Paragraph No.5 of the communication addressed to the Caste Scrutiny Committee on 02/07/2010 mentions that document was obtained for caste verification purposes by the petitioner. In this situation we fail to understand why the document could not be pointed out to the Caste Scrutiny Committee 2 immediately after its receipt. There is no explanation as to why document could not be pressed into service earlier. In the situation, the said document at this stage does not constitute a valid reason for review. Application, therefore, is rejected. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Deshmukh