IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY WRIT PETITION NO : 2859 of 1995 Between: T.Sathi Reddy, S/o. Somireddy, 6.3.1211 , Behind Kundan Bagh Begumpet , Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Management of I.D.P.L., Balanagar, Hyderabad. 2 The Addl.Industrial Tribunal Cum Addl Labour Court, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the award passed by the 2nd respondent in I.D.No.33/93 on 3.11.93 as published in A.P.Gazette under G.O.R.T.No.929 dt.8.5.94 and consequently of the 1st respondent passed terminating services of the petitioner by paying a small amount as illegal improper and without evidence. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.VENKATESWARA RAO (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the respondent No.1 : MR.K.SRINIVASA MURTHY, For the Respondent No.2: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE & LABOUR The Court made the following : O R D E R: The learned Counsel for the petitioner is not present. There is no representation on his behalf when the matter reached the bench. 2. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. __________________ G. BIKSHAPATHY, J Dated:09-09-2004 Ccm/prv To 1 The Management of I.D.P.L., Balanagar, Hyderabad. 2 The Addl.Industrial Tribunal Cum Addl Labour Court, Hyderabad. 3. 2 CCs to G.P. for Social Welfare and Labour, High Court Buildings A.P.Hyderabad (OUT) 4. 2 CD copies.