IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH AUGUST 2011 / 26TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22337 of 2011(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- 1. NIRANJAN R GAUREESHANKARAM, ELOOR EAST, UDYOGAMANDAL P.O, COHCIN. 2. JITHIN GEORGE PERUMALEL HOUSE, DEVI NAGAR, PIRAYZRI, PALAKKAD. 3. PRAVEEN OOMMEN THOMAS, THIPARAMBIL HOSUE, MANARCADU PO KOTTAYAM. 4. BIJO ANTONY SEBASTIAN, KARINGANAMATTOM, KARANTHAYA, BALYA P.O, KADABA, PUTTUR. BY ADV. SRI.FEBIN J.VELUKARAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS P.O, KOTTAYAM, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR 686 560. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM 686560. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.22337/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 30/6/11 PREFERRED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT AND THE CHALLAN REMITTING THE FEES. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 22337 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 17th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are M.B.A students. When the result of the 2nd Semester examination was declared, 1st and 2nd petitioners failed in Financial Management, Management Information System and Management Sciences, 3rd petitioner failed in Management Information Systems and the 4th petitioner failed in Management Science. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp