IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2633 (MS) OF 2001 (OLD NO. 13170 OF 1997) State of U.P., Through the Executive Engineer, Provincial Division, Public Works Department, Dehradun. ................Petitioner. Versus 1. The presiding Officer, Labour Court, U.P. Dehradun. 2. P.W.D. Mustor Roll Mazdoor Union, Dehradun. ...........Respondents. Learned Standing Counsel for the State. Dated: 05.05.2006 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari quashing the award dated 25th September, 1995 passed by the labour Court, U.P. Dehradun, in Adjudication Case No. 152/92. Further prayer has been made for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to give effect to the award dated 25.09.1995 passed by the labour Court. 2. Briefly stated, respondent no. 2 filed an application before the State Government U/s 4-K of the Industrial Disputes act and accordingly a reference was sent to the labour Court for Adjudication Award Notification dated 4th April, 1992. Following reference was made to the labour Court:- “mRrjizns’k ljdkj ds vkns’k la0 4511-16 ¼J0vk0½@36&Je¼1½lh0ch0 23@91] nsgjknwu fnukad 4&4&92 ds }kjk fuEufyf[kr fookn fo"k; vfHkfu.kZ; gsrq bl Je U;k;ky; dks iszf"kr fd;k x;k rFkk ftls vfHkfu.kZ; fookn la[;k 152@92 esa iathd`r fd;k x;kA vkS|ksfxd fookn ¼nks½ dk fooj.k%& “D;k lsok;kstdksa }kjk layXu ifjf’k"V esa mfYyf[kr vius 49 Jfedksa dks fu;fer u fd;k tkuk rFkk fu;fer deZpkfj;ksa dh Hkkafr dk;Z ,oa in ds vuq:i mUgs vU; lqfo/kk;sa u fn;k tkuk vuqfpr rFkk@vFkok voS/kkfud gS* ;fn gk¡] rks lacaf/kr Jfed rFkk ykHk@{kfriwfrZ ikus ds vf/kdkjh gSa fdl frfFk ls rFkk vU; fd fooj.k lfgrA” The Labour Court vide its order dated 25.09.1995 passed the following direction to the following effect:- “vr% eSa ;g vfHkfu.kZ; nsrk gWw fd lsok;kstdksa }kjk layXu ifjf’k"V esa mfYyf[kr vius 49 Jfedksa dks fu;fer osrueku u nsuk o fu;fer u djuk vuqfpr@voS/kkfud gS rFkk ;g funsZ’k nsrk gw¡ fd budks buds in dk fu;fer osruekug bl vfHkfu.kZ; dh frfFk ls fn;k tk; rFkk miyC/k inksa ij budk fu;ferhdj.k fd;k tk; vkSj ;fn miyC/k inksa dh la[;k de gS rks ,d Ldhe cukdj inksa dh Lohd`fr izkIr dh tk;A” While passing the award the labour court has recorded a finding to the following effect:- “lsok;kstdksa }kjk Lo;a vius foHkkx ds vkns’kksa dh izfr;ka nkf[ky dh xbZ gSa ftuesa ,sls Jfedksa dksa ftUgksaus ikap lky rd dke dj fy;k gS LFkk;h djus ds laca/k esa dk;Zokgh djus ds funsZ’k gSaA vr% dksbZ dkj.k ugha fn[krk fd oknh Jfedksa dks muds leku gh dk;Z djus okys fu;fer Jfedksa ds osru esa HksnHkko o vUrj gks rFkk ;g vUrj vkSj vf/kd yEcs le; rd pysA ;fn Lohd`r inksa dh la[;k de gS rks ;g foHkkx dk gh mRrjnkf;Ro gS fd inksa dh Lohd`fr izkIr djsa D;ksafd ikap lky ls Hkh vf/kd ds le; rd Jfedksa dk nSfud osru ij pyrs jguk *leku dk;Z&leku osru* ds fl)kUr ds foijhr gSA ,d gh izdkj dk leku dk;Z djus okys Jfedksa dh nks fHkUu Jsf.k;ksa ¼ftuesa osru o lqfo/kkvksa dk vUrj gks½ gksuk mfpr ugha gSA nSfud osru Hkksxh o dStqvy izd`fr ds Jfed ,d o"kZ ls vf/kd ugha pyrs gSa vkSj ;fn mudh vko’;drk ,d o"kZ ls Hkh vf/kd yxkrkj gksrh gS rks muds dk;Z dh izd`fr dStqvy o vLFkk;h ugha jg tkrhA bl laca/k esa ek0 mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk /kjokM+ ftyk ih MCyw Mh fyVjsV Msyh ost bEIykbt ,lksfl,’ku cuke dukZVd jkT; esa fnukda 23 Qjojh 90 ¼,Q ,y vkj 1990½ ist 576½ dks fn;s x;s fu.kZ; esa Hkh ;gh er O;Dr fd;k x;k gSA In view of the aforesaid findings that the respondent no. 2 has worked for more than five years and there is a rule for regularization. The finding recorded by the labour Court for consideration of regularization requires no interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Writ petition lacks merit and is dismissed. No order as to costs. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) 05.05.2006 Rathour