1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.93 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6722 OF 2002 Daud Ibrahim Wasta (deceased) throughLRs. Applicant versus Smt.Rashida Saifuddin Chogale, since deceased through LRs. Respondents Mr.G.S.Hiranandani i/by C.G.Gavnekar for applicant. Mr.K.K.Jadhav for respondents 1(A) to 1(D). CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 23rd April 2010 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the proposed legal representatives. The application is opposed by the legal representatives by filing a reply. It is contended that the son of the original petitioner is not brought on record and the only daughter of the original petitioner has been brought on record. The said objection has been noted in order dated 30th March 2010 passed in Civil Application No.1061 of 2009. 2. In any event, there is no dispute that the present applicant is one of the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner. Her name has been brought on record specifically subject to the objection that son of the 2 deceased petitioner has not been brought on record. Considering the averments made in the application, delay deserves to be condoned subject to payment of costs. Accordingly, the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c). The applicant will pay costs of Rs. 2,000/- to the proposed legal representatives. Amendment to be carried out within four weeks. (A.S.OKA, J.)