IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15301 of 2005 ALAKH BHUSHAN PRASAD SON OF LATE DEVENDRA PRASAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHURLAKH, P.S. SAMASTIPUR, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 17/09/2010 None appears for the petitioner to press this application. Learned counsel for the State is present. Challenge is to annexure-11 by virtue of which petitioner and other daily wagers working in the office of the respondents have been terminated. Petitioner has been paid for the period 1988-2000 before the order of termination. What is the basis for interference with the said order is not understood because removal of the daily wagers has been carried out on the direction of the State not to engage such persons and annexure-11 is an outcome of the said exercise. No interference is, therefore, warranted in the said order in the given circumstance. There is no further occasion for granting any other relief in this background. This writ application is dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)