IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16330 of 2008 1. Bharat Singh , Son of Late Radha Krishna Singh 2. Binay Singh, Son of Bharat Singh 3. Santosh Singh, Son of Ramchandra Singh 4. Vishnu Shankar Singh, Son of Chandrama Singh 5. Sunil Singh, Son of Ashutosh Singh 6. Prayag Singh, Son of Kedar Singh 7. Harendra Singh, Son of Ramchandra Singh All residents of Village- Mahuli, P.S. Ara ( Mufassil), District-Bhojpur ---------------- Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Kameshwar Yadav, Son of Bhola Yadav, resident of Village- Udaymanpur, P.S. Krishnagarh, District-Bhojpur -- Opp.Parties. ----------- 02 29-06-2010 When the case was called out, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Seven petitioners, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have prayed for quashing of the order dated 26.2.2008 passed in Sessions Trial No.293 of 2007 by the learned Fast Track Court –II, Ara. By the said order, the learned court below has rejected the petition filed under Section 228 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for remitting the case to the Magistrate for its trial. I have perused the impugned order. The trial is in relation to offences under Sections 147,148,353,379,504, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. In the case, there is material to show that during the occurrence, fire-arm was used. I do not find any defect in the rejection of petition filed under Section 228 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the learned trial court. I do not find any material on record to exercise inherent 2 power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in favour of the petitioners. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J )