IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 20TH JANUARY 2011 / 30TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1789 of 2011(W) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. JOSE PAUL T.,S/O.LATE T.K.PAVOO, AGED 62 YEARS, THEKKEKKARA HOUSE, CHOONDAL P.O.,CHOONDAL VILLAGE, TALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, KERALA - 680 502. 2. VARGHESE PAUL T., S/O.LATE T.K.PAVOO, AGED 60 YEARS, THEKKEKKARA HOUSE, CHOONDAL P.O. CHOONDAL VILLAGE, TALAPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT KERALA - 680 502. 3. FRANCIS PAUL T., S/O.LATE T.K.PAVOO, AGED 58 YEARS, THEKKEKKARA HOUSE, CHOONDAL P.O. CHOONDAL VILLAGE, TALAPILLY TALUK,THRISSUR DISTRICT, KERLA - 680 502. BY ADVS. SRI.PAUL JACOB SRI.PEARL K.DAVIS SRI.K.R.MURALI SRI.K.A.HASHIM SRI.M.A.ANZAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR - 680001. 2. CHOONDAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT,REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, CHOONADAL P.O., THRISSUR, PIN-680562. 3. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE TRANSPORT PROJECT, KUTTUPURAM P.O., PIN-679571. 4. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, COST FORD CONSTRUCTION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR - 680003. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM-695001. R1, R3& R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.1789 OF 2011(W) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioners, 3 ares of property which originally belonged to them was acquired for the purpose of widening the National Highway between Trissur and Kuttipuram. It is stated that the land was not utilized for National Highway and now the respondents are proposing to utilize the said land for the purpose of construction of a taxi stand. It is stated that if the proposal materializes it will result in obstruction of access to the Highway. It is with this grievance the writ petition is filed. 2. As at present it is seen that the petitioners have already moved the first respondent complaining of the above proposal by filing Exts.P2 and P3 representations and it is essential for the first respondent to deal with the grievance. 3. Therefore I direct that if Exts.P2 and P3 representations stated to have been made before the first respondent have been received and are pending, the first respondent will deal with the same with notice to the affected parties. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the first respondent who shall consider the representations and pass orders thereon. VI (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) WPC.No. 1789/2011 :2 :