IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10928 of 2011 VIJAY MAHATO @ NARENDRA KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 27.04.2011. Heard. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected on five occasions considering the facts of the case which have been narrated by me in the order passed on 08.08.2008 in Cr.Misc.No.29873 of 2008. However, the contention is that the nine witnesses examined so far after framing of charges on 7.9.2009 have not named the petitioner on identifying him as a participating accused. It was further contended that the other similarly situated accused, namely, Lato Mahto has been admitted to bail by a Bench of this Court in Cr.Misc.No.7600 of 2009. Regard being had to the submissions and the order of bail in favour of Lato Mahto, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Nalanda at 2 Biharsharif in Sessions Trial No.113 of 2009 arising out of Asthawan P.S.case No.10 of 2008 with following condition:- (i) That the petitioner shall attend the trial on all dates even if there is no purpose in that behalf and the bailors of the petitioner, preferably, shall be his family members or his close relatives who shall file their identity proofs before the court below with their bonds. (ii) Any attempt by the petitioner to intimidate the witnesses who are yet to be examined shall be sufficient for the court below to assume that this order had not been passed and the court below shall take steps for committing the petitioner into custody. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)