IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 12TH OCTOBER 2010 / 20TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 30265 of 2010(G) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- P.T. RAMAKRISHNAN, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.T. KANNAN, RESIDING AT 'PITHRUCHAYA', PMC 22/155, PAYANNUR P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT- 670 307. BY ADV. SRI.RAJAN VELLOTH, SRI.BABY MATHEW. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001. 2. THE PAYYANNUR MUNICIPALITY, PAYYANNUR, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PAYYANNUR P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT-670 307. 3. THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001. 4. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, KANNUR, PIN-670 301. 5. DR.MUNDAYADAN MUKUNDAN NAMBIAR, SYAMALAYAM, NEAR BUS STAND, PAYYANNUR P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT-670 307. 6. DR.KODOTH PADINHARE VEETTIL SYAMALA, W/O.DR.MUKUNDAN NAMBIAR, SYAMALAYAM, NEAR BUS STAND, PAYYANNUR P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT-670 307. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.P.N. SANTHOSH. R3 & R4 BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS, SC, POLL.C.BOARD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/10/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 30265 of 2010 G ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 12th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Main complaint of the petitioner is that despite having made Ext.P5 complaint to the Pollution Control Board, its authorities are taking steps for granting clearance certificate to respondents 5 and 6 for the establishment of a hospital. 2. When the matter came up for orders on 01-10- 2010, Standing Counsel for the Pollution Control Board was directed to obtain instructions as to whether Ext.P5 has been received and if so, what action has been taken. Accordingly, Standing Counsel obtained instructions and it is submitted that the Board has not received Ext.P5 so far. 3. In that view of the matter, there is no question of issuing any directions sought for by the petitioner for the consideration of Ext.P5. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks