THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY W.P.No.13863 of 2011 Date of Judgment: 04-05-2011 Between: Avatar Mehar Baba Charitable Trust and another ..Petitioner and The Director General of Police, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and two others ..Respondents The Court made the following Judgment: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY W.P.No.13863 of 2011 ORDER: The first petitioner is Avatar Mehar Baba Charitable Trust, Tettekunta Temple “Aparameharabad” Agraharam, Vemulawada Mandal, Karimnagar District and the second petitioner is claiming to be its Chairman/Joint Conveyor. According to them, they have lodged a complaint before the respondents on 27.02.2011, but however, no action has been taken on the said complaint. Hence, they filed a private complaint before the Magistrate in C.C.Sr.No.1526 of 2011, which was forwarded to the third respondent-Station House Officer, Sircilla Police Station. Based on the said complaint, an FIR was registered bearing No.81/2011 on 05.04.2011 against the persons, who are interfering with the affairs of the said temple. Alleging that inspite of registration of the said crime, no action has been taken against the said persons, the petitioners made another representation on 21.04.2011 stating that one Goli Jeevan is threatening them and others that he will commit suicide by putting a letter in his pocket showing their names. The grievance of the petitioners is that so far the respondents have not taken any action on the said representation. Hence, this writ petition. The manner in which the petitioners are filing representation after representation and the present writ petition discloses that they want to settle their personal scores with the persons, whose names are shown in the complaint. Further, since the person, who is threatening the petitioners to commit suicide, has already been arrayed as accused in Crime No.81 of 2011, the petitioners can always bring the same to the notice of the learned Magistrate, who forwarded the complaint, and to record his evidence about the threatens exerted by the accused. In view of the same, issuance of a mandamus for each and every representation to take action does not arise. In view of the said remedy available to the petitioner, the writ petition cannot be entertained and the same is liable to be dismissed. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J. 04-05-2011 va