IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2008 / 19TH CHAITHRA 1930 Crl.MC.No. 1475 of 2008() ------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 22/09/2007 IN CRMP.3698/2007 IN CRMP.2021/2007 of SESSIONS COURT, THODUPUZHA .................... PETITIONER: ACCUSED: -------------------- RAVI, S/O. BHASKARAN, AGED 42 YEARS, KARAKKATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, KURUTHIKKALAM, AARAKKULAM VILLAGE,IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO SMT.C.M.CHARISMA SRI.N.A.SHAFEEK RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT: ------------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTING SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANJAAR POLICE STATION, IDUKKI, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZE THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.M.C. NO. 1475 of 2008 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 08-04-2008 ORDER The petitioner who is the accused in Crime No. 217 of 2006 of Kanjar Police Station for an offence punishable under Sec. 302 I.P.C. was granted bail by the Sessions Court, Thodupuzha as per Annexure I order dated 25th May 2007 in Crl.M.P. No. 2021 of 2007. One of the bail conditions was that he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, promise, threat or influence to any person who is likely to be acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing the facts to the court or to the investigating officer. Subsequently, an application was moved at the instance of the investigating officer for cancellation of bail alleging that the petitioner had on 7-7-2007 criminally trespassed into the residential house of one Chinnamma (who had assisted the police in apprehending the accused) and put her in fear of death resulting in the Kanjar Police registering Crime No. 279 of 2007 for offences punishable under Sections 448 and 506 (ii) I.P.C. The learned Sessions Judge thereupon cancelled the bail granted to the petitioner who was arrested on 18-10-2007 and remanded the judicial custody Crl.M.C. No, 1475 of 2008 -:2:- where he continues. 2. I am not inclined to set aside Annexure II order cancelling the bail of the petitioner. The remedy of the petitioner to file a fresh application for regular bail before the appropriate court. This Crl. M.C. is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani.