CR No. 1076 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CR No. 1076 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 15.02.2011 Bikramjit and others ....Petitioners Vs. Union of India and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present:- Mr. G.S. Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioners. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) The petitioners have invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 06.08.2007 (Annexure P-27) passed by the trial Court as well as the order dated 03.01.2011 (Annexure P-30) passed by the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Ludhiana, whereby the petitioners were refused ad-interim injunction. The suit land admittedly comprises in Khewat No.1875, 1964, Khasra Nos. 1578 and 1579. The same is recorded in the name of the provincial Government and in possession of the Public Works Department. The nature of the land is shown as 'road'. The plaintiffs-petitioners claim themselves in possession over the said land while alleging that they have constructed their shops and houses over it. Both the Courts below have declined to grant injunction on the ground that petitioners being not owners of the property cannot seek injunction being trespassers. Apart from the three ingredients for grant of injunction, CR No. 1076 of 2011 2 the larger common interest has also to be seen by the Courts at the time of granting injunction. The respondents are using the land for public welfare and the petitioners having no right or title in the same, have no right to seek the injunction. It is also well settled that a trespasser cannot claim injunction against the true owner. The counsel for the petitioners has failed to indicate any perversity or illegality in the orders. No ground to interfere is made out. Dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) 15th of February, 2011 JUDGE ajp