IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 250 of 2006 (M/B) 1. James Das S/o Late Sri Dharm Das. 2. Smt. Urmila W/o Sri James Das. 3. Km. Guriya D/o James Das. 4. Km. Babli D/o James Das. 5. Babloo S/o James Das. R/o Mission Compound, Bachcha Park, Meerut (U.P.). 6. Naseem S/o Late Mahmood Ali Khan, R/o 206 Satiganj, P.S. Sadar, District Meerut (U.P.) .......... Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal. through S.S.P., Haridwar. 2. Station Officer, Police Station Ranipur, District Haridwar. 3. Pitar Das S/o Sri Dharma Das, R/o S-310 Shivalik Nagar, Haridwar .......... Respondents Petitioners’ counsel absent. Sri H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. Shri Bipin Mohan Pingal, Advocate for respondent no. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Petitioners’ counsel absent. Sri H.C. Pande, Additional. Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. Shri Bipin Mohan Pingal, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Sri Pande, the learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners James Dass, Smt. Urmila, Km. Guriya, Km. Babli, Babloo and Naseem seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them now has become infructuous, as the police after the completion of the investigation has filed charge-sheet against all the petitioners before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 10.03.2006 stands vacated automatically. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 06.07.2006 06.07.2006 A