Wm m200 WWW wmm WWW WWW WW %3§fcma11'%¥1 PETITIONERS REsPONDENTs 1. W.P. 1S] No. 5581(2008 Nand Kumar Mishxa, S/o Lat€ Bahoran Prasad Mishra, ‘agai auout 54 years Abdul Jahid, S] o Abdul Gaifur Khan, aged about 47 years Jajnaras‘an Pmhit, S/o Late B.M. Purohit, aged about 4‘? years Dilip B. ar, S/o Shn BaJrang Bhartl aged about 40 years Ram, S/o. Shri Ghasiya Ram, aged aboutS years Chedi L Tandon, S/o Shn' Lachhi Ram Tandon, Kathottare, S/o Skm' Kemchand , aged about 44 years 'Uman ingh Mandavi, S/o Shri Rohi Das Manda , aged about 46 years Daulat am Sahu, S/o. Shri T.R. Sahu, aged aboutS years Daya Sinha, S/o. Shri Laxman Sinha, aged about 5 years Nandu m Dhruv S/o Shri Indraman Dhruv, aged ab ut 45 yeam Mam Kosle S/ o Shn Shyam Lal Kosle aged about 4 years Ashok umar Thakur, S/o Shri Bahadur Singh, aged ab ut 4O years All re51 ent of D1st11ct Ja11 Dantewada, D1stnct- State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretaly, Home AKau‘s department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Ralpur (LG) i {13mg Luv», “e“axtmem “e d “Kectm “eretal 3°“ mw (Wu) 10. 11. 12. 13. i e R a R W W W mm (Wu) WWW WWW Wmm ‘2, WWW WWR ésaffmm Raipur, Di 3. Jail Supe . District Be 4. Jail SupE District Dz Writ Petition under Article SB: HON. SHRI DHIRENDRA M 13-10-2008 Shri Rahul Jha, counssl f0 Shri Yashwant Singh TI respondents] State. By this petition under Arti petitioners have impugned the unauthorized possession of Gc cle 226 of the Constitution of India, the order of Annexure P-5, whereby they have been directed to pay licence fee @ Rs.2000/- p.m. for continuing vemment accommodations allotted to them at Jail Line, Jagdalpur even after several months of their transfers to District Jail, Dantewada. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners tice of Annexure P-S, whereby they are Rs. 1500/ - for unauthorized possession allotted to them at their previous place igned order of Annexure P-S they have y rent @ Rs.2000/-. He further submits to retain accommodationat Jagdalpur, till they are not allotted Government accommodations in the jail t strict— Raipur (CG) .rinteudent, Central Jail Jagdalpur, _star(CG) Iintendent, District Intewada(CG) t 226 of the Constitution of India [SHRA, J Jail Dantewada, r the petitioners. Lakur, Dy. Advocate General for the were initially served with the nc directed to pay monthly rent @ of Government accommodations of posting. However by the imp1 now been directed to pay month that the petitioners are entitled W mm (Wu) WWW premises at Dantewada. The recovery of rent @ 2000/- pm. is too excessive. He further submit WmwY§wm %~‘aifdna?@3r 1; that respondents be directed not to take coercive steps for their evictbn for a further period of three months so that they may arrange for their accommodation at Dantewada. On me other hand, It submits that recovery of'rent occupation of the Governme rules applicable to the Govr steps shall be taken for a perpod of three months as prayed for. In View of the above su parties, the instant petitior respondents not to take coercive steps for evicting the petitioners for a period of three months from earned counsel for the respondents/State from the petitioners for their unauthorized nt accommodations shall be made as per :rnment employees, HOWever, no coercive ‘bmissions made by learned counsel for the 1 is disposed of with a direction to the today. The respondents shall also consider recovery of rent from the petitioners sympathetically, keeping in view that the petitioners are low paid employees. i/Sdl— \ mama .\/ “a“!we“yiége a WW m zoo mgr