IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.521 of 2007 MD.MASALEHUDDIN Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 5. 8.9.2008. Heard learned counsel for both the parties. This Cr. Revision is heard only on the quantum of maintenance. Court below has directed the petitioner to pay maintenance of Rs.1000/- per month to the opposite party no. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a labourer and is running a punture shop and his monthly income is Rs.900/-only. It is further submitted that the petitioner has only 4-5 kathas of land. There is no income from agriculture. On the other hand, opposite party no. 2 submits that the petitioner has 16 Bigahas of land and is also running a hardware shop. Considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order. Having regard to the facts and - 2 - circumstances of the case, petitioner is directed to pay Rs.750/- per month to the opposite party no. 2 as maintenance from the date of filing of the application in stead of Rs.1000/-. With the above modification in the maintenance order, this Cr. Revision is dismissed. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)