IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 22ND MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 4493 of 2009(I) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- DR.M.A.LIZY, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR COLLEGE OF CO-OPERATION, BANKING AND MANAGEMENT KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY,VELLANIKKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.ABDUL RASHEED SRI.K.A.SHAMSUDEEN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY VELLANIKKARA THRISSUR DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. ASSOCIATE DEAN, COLLEGE OF CO-OPERATION BANKING AND MANAGEMENT, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY VELLANIKKARA THRISSUR. BY ADVOCATE RANJITH THAMPAN ADDL.A.G. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.4493 of 2009 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of February , 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner is an Assistant Professor working in the College of Co- operation Banking and Management. It is the case of the petitioner that her previous service as Lecturer in the Karnataka Regional Engineering College, Surathkal shall be counted for Career Advancement Scheme. Ext. P4 and P6 are the representations submitted by the petitioner before the 1st respondent-Registrar for the said purpose. According to the petitioner on the basis of Ext.P3 and P5 her past service shall be considered under the Career Advancement Scheme. It is her further case that she fulfills the condition prescribed under Ext.P3 and Ext.P5 It is also pointed out that candidates who have promoted to the post of Assistant Professor (Senior scale) vide Ext.P7 are juniors to the petitioner in service, that if the respondents followed the regulations contained in Ext.P3 and Ext.P5 the petitioner would have been given promotion on an earlier date than that of her juniors. In the circumstances I am of the view that the matter requires immediate attention of the 1st respondent. Hence there will be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the grievances of the petitioner set out in Ext.P4 and P6 and pass appropriate orders on merits in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and other affected persons within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. (HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE) es. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) 4493 of 2009 ---------------------------- JUDGMENT 11th February, 2009