R.S.A No. 2451 of 2007 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A No. 2451 of 2007 Date of decision : December 10, 2008 Smt Geeta Rani and others ...... Appellants through Mr.O.P.Goyal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Priya Khurana, Advocate v. Kashmiro and others, ...... Respondents through Mr.Vipin Mahajan, Advocate CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J This appeal has been filed against concurrent judgments of the Courts below dismissing the suit of the appellants that they have become owners of the property in dispute to the exclusion of other heirs of their father- on the basis of a will. Both the Courts have found that the will was shrouded by suspicious circumstances. It may be mentioned that both parties had produced hand writing experts but the Courts below rightly ignored their evidence since both of them had suffered strictures in the past. The learned trial Court examined the signatures itself and came to a conclusion that they did not match with the admitted signatures. R.S.A No. 2451 of 2007 ::2:: Learned counsel for the appellants invited me to examine the signatures myself arguing vigorously that a perusal of the signatures would convince this Court that the impugned findings are completely perverse. On examining the same, I am, however, not persuaded by the argument. I find no reason to differ with the finding of the Courts below that the signatures on the will, in dispute, cannot be said to be that of the father of the parties. In this view of the matter, the will having not been proved, I hold that the questions of law proposed do not arise in this appeal. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. ( AJAY TEWARI ) December 10, 2008. JUDGE `kk'