THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8357 of 2011 Dated 29.03.2011 Between: Bathula Murali …Petitioner And The Revenue Divisional Officer, Jagtial and another …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri K.Venumadhav Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2: Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies The Court made the following: ORDER: The short and simple grievance of the petitioner, whose fair price shop authorization was suspended on 10.02.2011, is that in spite of the petitioner submitting his explanation to the show-cause notice of the even date issued by respondent No.1, the enquiry has not been completed and final order has not been passed. In the light of this grievance of the petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.1 to complete the enquiry and pass a final order, after considering the explanation stated to have been submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.10371 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 29th March, 2011 GHN