IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28055 of 2008 BIRENDRA MANDAL & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 25.9.2008 Heard the learned counsel for petitioner no.1 Birendra Mandal and the State. The petitioner no.1 is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.1877/2007 for the alleged offences registered under sections 419, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that the petitioner no.1 in collusion with co-accused Satya Narayan Mandal got a sale deed executed in the year 1991 in his favour with respect to the land which belongs to the complainant, who is the wife of the brother of said co-accused Satya Narayan Mandal. The learned counsel for the petitioner no.1 submits that the present complaint has been filed for ulterior purposes in order to settle the disputes between the brothers. The petitioner no.1 had purchased the land in the year 1991 after paying the appropriate consideration money and is in possession since then. 2 The learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer. However, he is not in a position to refute the submission with regard to the sale deed in question, as contained in Annexure 2. Considering the submissions, as noticed above, it is directed that petitioner Birendra Mandal, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No.1877/2007, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.P. Mishra, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Katihar, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)