IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16125 of 2006 YOGENDRA PRASAD ROY son of late Ram Dayal Roy residence of village-Kerwan P.O.- Ishwapur, District-Chhapra (Saran) Versus 1. THE M.D.,BIHAR RAJYA SAHKARI Bhoomi Vikash Bank Samiti, Patna, Budh Marg, Patna. 2. Chairman Bihar Rajya Sahkari Bhoomi Vikash Bank Samiti, Patna, Budh Marg, Patna. 3. Deputy Managing Director (Finance), Bihar State Co-operative Land Development Bank Board, Patna. 4. Branch Manager Bihar Rajya Sahkari Bhoomi Vikash Bank Samiti, Branch Basantpur. 5. Bihar Rajya Sahkari Bhoomi Vikash Bank Samiti, Patna, Patna through its Managing Director. 6. Branch Manager Saraikela District-Saraikela, Bihar Rajya Sahkari Bhoomi Vikash Bank Samiti, State Jharkhand through its Managing Director, Bihar Patna. ----------- 3 18.03.2010 Heard Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Rajesh Prasad Chaudhary, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, Bank. Learned counsel for the respondent Bank submits that the Board of Directors under a policy decision have resolved to make payment of post retiral dues of all such employees retiring until 31st of March, 2005. As the petitioner stands retired on 31st January, 2005 then there is no impediment in his way in receiving the said benefit. He however submits 2 that the Bank is not in a position to make payment of the pre retiral dues which are being paid in chronological manner, as per funds being received by the Bank from the State Government and submits that no sooner the funds are made available and the case of the petitioner comes within the zone of consideration then the payments would be made to him. In that view of the matter, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent Managing Director of the Bank to ensure the payment of the post retiral claim(s) of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. In so far as the pre-retiral claims of the petitioner is concerned, as found admissible by the Bank, the same should also be paid to the petitioner as per his turn in the chronological order of payment, as being followed by the Bank. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J. )