..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.341 OF 2007 1.Shobha Santosh Bagul, & 2.Laxmibai Dashrath Bagu. ...Applicants. Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.N.R.Bubna,Advocate for the Applicants. Mr.Rajesh More, APP, for State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 22nd March, 2007. DATED : 22nd March, 2007. DATED : 22nd March, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking bail in C.R.No.109 of 2006 of City Police Station, Manmad. The said C.R. is mainly under Section 302, 307 of IPC. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicants has submitted that applicant No.1 is a juvenile and hence she may be granted bail on this ground. The said ground has not been raised by the applicant No.1 before the Sessions Court. In this view of the ..(2).. matter, liberty is granted to applicant No.1 to prefer a fresh application for bail before the Sessions Court raising this ground. 4. As far as applicant No.2 is concerned, the learned Advocate for the applicants seeks liberty to file a fresh application for bail annexing relevant documents. Liberty as prayed for is granted. 5. Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)