/ 1 / IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1546 OF 2003 The State of Maharashtra ...Appellant V/s. Agatrao Babu Hirave & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.S.S. Pednekar APP for Appellant/State. Mr.K.B. Sonwalkar for Respondent Nos.1 to 14. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : 4th AUGUST, 2007. P.C:- 1. Heard learned APP for the Appellant/State and learned counsel for the Respondents. 2. The State has filed this appeal challenging judgment and order passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Dahiwadi, for quantum of sentence in which the Appellant is seeking enhancement of sentence which is awarded to the Respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the Respondents submitted that the Respondents had already undergone sentence which was awarded by / 2 / the Trial Court. He submitted that the Trial Court had taken a lenient view. Taking into consideration facts that accused are men and women, no grievous injury was caused to the Complainant. 4. I have perused the impugned order. The Trial Court has considered all the aspects of the case and, thereafter, passed the impugned order. I do not see any reason to interfere with the said order. Criminal Appeal is therefore, dismissed in liminie. V.M. KANADE, J.