1 wp 8006.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8006 OF 2011 Nazir Pachumiya Sayyed and others .. Petitioners Versus Sultana Ahmad Take and others .. Respondents Shri R. B. Deshmukh, Advocate for Petitioners. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 13TH OCTOBER, 2011. PER COURT : . The present petition is filed against the order rejecting the objections of the petitioners to restrain the respondents from asking the question about the earlier appeal bearing R.C.A. No. 197 of 1991 and inclusion of advocate Shri Bedre in the appeal. 2. Shri Deshmukh, the learned counsel submits that the present petitioners who are plaintiffs are not at all concerned with the said appeal, nor is the subject matter of the present litigation. The respondents does not have an unfettered right to ask irrelevant question in the cross examination. According to 2 wp 8006.11 the learned counsel it is duty of the Court to refrain a party from putting irrelevant questions. Such a question should have been disallowed and may not have been entertained. Moreover, no proper reasonings are given by the Court while turning down the objection of the petitioners. 3. To allow a particular question to be put in the cross examination or not is the discretion of the Court. No doubt, the said discretion is a judicial discretion which is to be exercised as per the judicial norms and legal principles. No doubt, the party has got ample right of cross examination, but the same cannot be said to be unfettered with regard to the question which would not be within the realm of the dispute between the parties. It is for the Court to regulate the same. Perusal of the order shows that no detailed reasonings are given by the Court while turning the objection, however, as the writ petition is only against the order allowing the respondents' counsel to put the particular question, which would not be prejudicial and affecting any substantive right of the party, I am not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. 3 wp 8006.11 4. In the light of the above, the writ petition is dismissed, however, with no order as to costs. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Oct. 11