C Rev.- 1056/98 -Indra Raj Vs. The Raj. State Sriganganagar : Order dt.8.7.08 1/2 S.B. CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO NO.1056/98 Indra Raj Vs. The Raj. State Sriganganagar. Date of order : 8th July, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. J. Gehlot for the petitioner. Ms. Sabana Kuresi for Mr. Vijay Agarwal for the respondents. --------- 1. Heard learned counsels. 2. Ms. Sabana Kuresi appears for the respondents and prays for time. Learned counsel for the petitioner on the side opposite submits that the controversy involved in this case is covered by a detailed judgment of this Court in connected revision petitions. One such revision petition No.1057/1998 Chandrabhan Vs. The Rajasthan Srigangangar Sugar Mils Ltd. was decided by this Court on 27th July, 2000. The operative portion of the said judgment is as under:- “When in the case in hand the petitioner was able to satisfy about delay for the reasons mentioned in the application which were not controverted by the respondent, I am of the view that the order of learned District Judge suffers from infirmity and is illegal. Consequently, the revision petition is hereby allowed. The order of learned District Judge allowing the appeal is set aside while the order of the learned Payment of Wages Authority dated 23.5.1992 is restored. No order as to costs.” C Rev.- 1056/98 -Indra Raj Vs. The Raj. State Sriganganagar : Order dt.8.7.08 2/2 3. By the impugned order dated 17.8.1998 in the present case also, the application filed by the workman before the Payment of Wages Authority was held to be time barred though the same was filed after 12 months from the date of the deduction from wages. 4. In view of the aforesaid, this revision petition is allowed in same term and the learned Payment of Wages Authority is directed to decide the case of the petitioner-workman afresh in accordance with law. No order as to costs. [ DR. VINEET KOTHARI ], J. item No.71 babulal/-