IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No. M- 618 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: September 06, 2011 Laxmi Narain and others ... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr.D.R.Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Satyavir Singh Yadav, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for respondent – State. Mr.R.K.Saini, Advocate for respondent No.2. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) By this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners seek quashing of First Information Report (for short 'FIR) No.116 dated February 07th, 2009, registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') in Police Station City Jind. By order dated January 10th, 2011, Daya Chaudhary, J. directed the parties to appear before the trial Court and the trial Court was directed to record the statements of the parties. In compliance with the same, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jind recorded the statements of the parties, whereby, they stated that they have compromised the matter. Compromise-deed (Annexure P2) has also been placed on record. Indeed, the dispute between the parties was of personal nature. In view of this, there should not be any impediment in allowing the parties to compromise the matter. Support to this view can be had from the authority 'Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab' 2008 (2) RCR (Criminal) 429, wherein, Hon'ble Supreme Court has ruled that in such type of cases, where the dispute is of personal nature, Court should ordinarily, accept the compromise. In view of above, petition is accepted. Consequently, FIR No.116 dated February 07th, 2009, registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 34 IPC in Police Station City Jind and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed. September 06, 2011 ( NAWAB SINGH ) `gian' JUDGE