IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 1785 of 2010 Date of Decision: 20.09.2010 Shian Chand .... Petitioner Versus Estate Officer and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. J.P. Bhatt, Advocate for the respondents 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. Present petition is filed challenging order dated 11.4.2009 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Karnal as well as order dated 4.1.2010 passed by Addl. District Judge, Karnal whereby both the Courts below have dismissed the application moved by the plaintiff- petitioner seeking ad interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent states that suit itself has been dismissed vide judgment and decree dated 17.8.2010, hence, present petition has rendered infructuous. 3. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (ALOK SINGH) 20.09.2010 JUDGE reena