IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHI-IATTI SGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) ^rit petition No.—'--^'0/2 004. PETITIONERS : 1. DTo^^P^Baderiya S/o Shri C<L\ Baderiya, aged 43 years, Assistant Surgeon (Medical Officer),P*H^C< Bhopalpattanam, Distt.Dantewada (C.G.) ..^yy Dr. K-.L.Malviya S/o Shri Parwat )\°.<*^ Lal Malviya» a^eci 39 years, Asstto ^y^^iA--''' Surgeon (Medical Officer) P.H.C. .'-•;^y~ ^^^ ^' ^f^ v ^•^^... ^' Geed'am, Distt, Dantewada (CeG.) Ver s a s RESPONDENTS / $ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, public Health & Family Welfare and Medical Education Department Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C^G<) 2^ State of Madhya Pradesh Throagh : The Secrefeary Public Health & Family Welfare and Medical EduGation IDepartment Vallabh Bhawan Bho-oal (M.p.). 3. 4. The Secretary, General Administra- tion .Department (G,A»D^) and State Re-organisatlon Cell Vallabh Bhawan Bhopal (M.P.). Union of India Through : The Searetary,Ministry of Personnel Public Grievances and Pension, Personnel & Training D@pa^tment, New Delhio contdo,.. %x^'^^g) 2 - 5, Direator,. Health Serviaes, Raipur (Ohhattisgeirh) • miT E.ETITION UNDER ARTICLE_ .2 26/2 27 OS'_ THE cqNSTITaTION OF INDIA : =F XI-HC-22 ^n^T^FT 'f^W^^T ^[W^ifi^T ~3^r -?qFTRW, 'S^NTT?, 'fa<r11^li< _..s.^"i/^li <^) WH^ff WNI^ •M 200 •N^ST' 3TR^T ^Tl8[R ^rfi?T 4)i^11Tl-i '^nwff ^ 1^1 <r3i<^« ^3Tf^R3TT^T 21.04.2004 Shri Subhash Yadav, c<|»unselfor the petitioners. Shri AKhU Agrawal, Pai^el Lawyer f<a' the State. None for respondents ^b.2 and 3. Service to them is not required as no relief is claimted from them. Service to them is dispensed with. SIiri Vinjay Harit, Sr. ^tanding Oounsel wlth Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Addl. Standing Co^uasel for Union <rf India and its officials. Applicatkm for urgent ^earinig is allowed. Heard. By this petition imder ^rtlcle 226/277 offfae Constitution of India, the petitioners hav^ submitted fhat though they have /been aUocated to the State o^ Madhya Piadesh but they are not being relieved. Counsel for jpetitioners relied on jud^aeiAs of fhis Court in W.P.No.516/20|03 pr. Ashok Kumar Jafai & Ors. Vs State of Chhattisgarh ^ Ors.) dated 17.12.^008 and iti W.P.No. 152/2004 pr. Shi^ Dayal Shavnerc v8 State of Chhattisgarh & Ors,), copies the petition as Ann^cures P-^ by the otber side. Having considered the on reeord and in view of the tfae legal positlon, the actio| |>fwhich have beai flled edoi^with and P-7. This fact is not disputed ^- Facts and ciTeumstances, materlal udgmeMs cited above and turfher a of tfae State aaithorities in not [Tft^^fa~^ XI-HC-22 ^n^T'^i I^TOF^T^ ^THWHit7! ^ 'Y ^&l^^ ^F ^^f ^[qT^PT, 'ST^FIS, f^<r11^li< ar^r 1q?ra? -.'^MO. ^JO/O^ "^' 200 \.^ WRC^T^W^ "N^T' 3^Ti^H8;R'^T —-2-- relieving the petdtioners cani]|ot be sustained aml the petitioiiers are entitled for relieving. Accordin^y, the petitiojn is edlowed and the respondents are directed to relieve the Leamed counsel for elections are going on and 20.05.2004. In fhe circumstances, if relieved immediately after 31.05.2004. With this observation, pe1|itioners. t|he Union of India submlts that ejlection process will continue upto 24) 1|he petition is disposed of. obi^i<n^Ti T[P:T^ff ^ fe^ <f^^i< iFT^TH'3?^ is direeted that the petitiDners be .05.2004 and in any ease before Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [Tft^itfe^ ^^ -^^