IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINIAL Writ Petition No. 1918 of 2008 (M/S) Shri Rakesh Bahal .............. Petitioner. Versus Smt. Rita Jain and others .............. Respondents. ................ Mr. Arvind Vashistha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Alok Singh, Senior Counsel with Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate for the respondents. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. CLMA No.7474 of 2008 On due consideration, CLMA No. 7474 if 2008 (Amendment Application) is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to amend the memo of the writ petition to the extent indicated in the prayer part of the Amendment Application. Writ Petition No. 1918 of 2008 (MS) Both the Courts below have found that the petitioner-plaintiff had failed to establish a prima facie case. Whereas the learned Trial Court had passed an order directing the parties to maintain status quo, in appeal, the learned District Judge vide the impugned judgment dated 20th October, 2008 vacated that order and dismissed the Temporary Injunction Application filed by the petitioner-plaintiff. The cross-objection filed by the petitioner-plaintiff were accordingly also dismissed even while the appeal filed by respondents 1 to 3 was allowed. After hearing the detailed arguments of the learned counsel for the parties, I feel disinclined to interfere. The petition is dismissed in limine. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 12.11.2008 A