((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.444 OF 2006 The Bombay Milk Scheme Staff Co-op. Canteen and Stores Petitioners versus The General Manager, The Manager in charge, Worli Diary, Mumbai. Respondent Mr.S.R.Mishra for petitioners. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 6th February 2006 PC : 1. After hearing Shri Mishra for the petitioners, I see no reason to interfere with the interim order passed by learned Principal Judge during the course of hearing of an appeal against an order of eviction issued against the petitioners. More so, when the premises have now been sealed according to Shri Mishra. 2. As far as grievance of Shri Mishra that goods worth Rs.4.00 lakh and which are perishable in nature are lying in the shop is concerned, it ((-2-)) would be open for the petitioners to apply to the learned Principal Judge for appropriate orders for either removal of the stock or it’s disposal. Needless to state that such application would be dealt with by the learned Judge on it’s own merits and in accordance with law uninfluenced by the observations in the impugned order. Since interim relief during pendency of an appeal against eviction has been refused, the learned Principal Judge to endeavour to dispose of the main appeal within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)