IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2008 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 35658 of 2008(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SMT. PRABHA KUMARI, PRABHA MANDIRAM, MATTAMOODU, VATTAPPARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAYURAM. BY ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.SAIJO HASSAN SRI.RAJAN VELLOTH SRI.A.S.SABU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. RAJASEKHARAN NAIR, PUTHUVAL PUTHENVEEDU, MATTAMOODU, VATTAPPARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC,K.S.E.COMM FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 35658 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 3rd December, 2008. J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext. P3 order, whereby petitioner's application for joint hearing of the petitioner's O.P along with other O.Ps raising similar questions of fact and law has been rejected by the State Election Commission on the ground that the petitioner and the respondent in each of the O.Ps referred to by the petitioner are different and there is nothing common as far as the parties are concerned in any of the O.Ps, joint hearing of which is sought for by the petitioner. In so far as the parties are different, I do not think that the petitioner can seek hearing of her case along with other cases, especially when, admittedly, the trial in other cases is not yet over. Therefore, I do not find anything wrong wit Ext. P3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.