1 ABAG-385.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.385 OF 2011 {For Anticipatory Bail} Om Shyamlal @ Shyam Manuja .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.386 OF 2011 Raisingh Manmohansingh Ahuja & 2 Ors. .... Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.387 OF 2011 Shyamlal @ Shyam Dayaram Manuja .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent S/Shri Kapil Dave with M.G. Shukla for the Applicants in all applications. Ms Alpa T. Javeri, APP, for the State in ABA-Nos.385 and 386 of 2011. Ms R.V. Newton, APP, for the State in ABA-387 of 2011. 2 ABAG-385.11 CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: MAY 02, 2011 P.C: 1. These are applications for anticipatory bail by persons who apprehend arrest in Crime No.63 of 2011, registered with Vithalwadi Police Station, District Thane on the report of first informant who claims to have been duped of Rs.1,15,000/-. The learned counsel for the applicants states that the applicant in Criminal Application No.387 of 2011, that is Shyamlal @ Shyam Dayaram Manuja, who is supposed to have received this amount, would deposit this amount with the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ulhasnagar within a period of one week of the order being available on the internet. Therefore, the question of the applicants being subjected to custodial interrogation would not arise. In view of this, all the three applications are allowed. In the event of the applicants' arrest in the afore-stated crime number, the applicants be released on bail on their furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs.25,000/- per person on 3 ABAG-385.11 the condition that the applicants shall report at the police station concerned on 9-5-2011 at 11:00 a.m. for interrogation and thereafter as and when required by the I.O.. The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and they shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the trial Court. 2. If the applicant in Criminal Application No.387 of 2011, that is, Shyamlal @ Shyam Dayaram Manuja does not deposit the amount of Rs.1,15,000/- with the learned Magistrate within a period of one week of the order being available on the internet, the order in respect of all the three applicants would stand cancelled, without reference to the Court. If the applicant Shyamlal @ Shyam Dayaram Manuja deposits the money, the learned Magistrate shall invest the same in fixed deposit in any nationalized Bank and shall deal with the amount at the end of the trial, as per the result of the case. 3. This order shall remain in force till 4 ABAG-385.11 the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge-sheeted, the applicants may furnish fresh bond before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, dated 2-12-2010, delivered in Criminal Appeal No.2271 of 2010, arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 7615 of 2009 {Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.}. 4. The applications accordingly stand disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)