THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO.1062 OF 1998 Dated 13th August, 2009 Between: M.Satyanarayana Murthy …Petitioner And Peddada Annapurna and others …Respondents The Court made the following JUDGMENT: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed by the second respondent in O.P.No.298 of 1989 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal-cum-Additional District Judge, Srikakulam. The O.P was filed by the first respondent claiming compensation for the injuries received by her in an accident that took place on 17.05.1989 involving a vehicle bearing No.AAS 2025, owned by the appellant and, insured with the second respondent. The third respondent was the driver of the vehicle. The Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.15,000/- as compensation and held the owner of the vehicle i.e., the appellant and the driver of the vehicle jointly and severally liable to pay the same. The Insurance Company was absolved of its liability. In this appeal, several grounds are urged to contend that the second respondent i.e, the insurer is liable to pay the compensation. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the first respondent. The same accident has given rise to filing of as many as 11 O.Ps before the Tribunal. Similar view was taken in all the O.Ps in the common judgment dated 10.07.1996. It is brought to the notice of this Court that all the appeals filed against the other orders in the other O.Ps were dismissed on 22.08.2002. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands on the same footing. Hence, the same is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated 13th August, 2009 vrn