IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 6TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 15TH KARTHIKA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3143 of 2006(C) -------------------------------------------- CRA.749/2005 OF ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, KOZHIKODE. .................... REVISION PETITIONER/ APPELLANT/ ACCUSED: --------------------------------------------------------------------- PRADEEP KUMAR C.C., S/O. CHELLAPPAN, CHEMBAKASSERIL HOUSE, CHUZHALI P.O., SREEKANTAPURAM VIA, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS. RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS/ COMPLAINANT & STATE: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PARASMAL LUNAVAT, S/O. PADMACHAND JAIN, PROPRIETOR, DOLPHIN FINANCIAL SERVICES, E.K.P COMPLEX, OPPOSITE PAICO, KALLAI ROAD, CALICUT, REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER K.GIRISHAN, S/O. BHASKARAN, GREENS, NEAR WATER TANK, P.O.PUTHIYARA, CALICUT. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. THOMAS JOHN AMBOOKEN. THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRL.R.P. NO. 3143/2006-C: ORDER ON CRL.M.A. NO. 8918/2006 IN CRL.R.P. NO. 3143/2006 DISMISSED 06/11/2008 SD/- M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. prv. M.N.KRISHNAN, J ===================== Crl.R.P. No.3143 OF 2006 ===================== Dated this the 6th day of November 2008 O R D E R This revision petition is preferred against the conviction and sentence passed in Crl.A.No.749 of 2005. It was a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act where the trial court convicted him and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for a period of 3 months and to pay a compensation of Rs.1,41,700/- and in default, sentence of simple imprisonment for one month. On appeal, the conviction was confirmed and sentence was modified till the raising of the court and to pay a fine of Rs.1,41,700/- as compensation. It is against that decision, the revision had been preferred and this Court while admitting this revision granted suspension of the sentence on deposit of Rs.75,000/-. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the revision petitioner had already undergone imprisonment as directed as well as default sentence imposed on him and Crl.R.P.3143/2006 -:2:- there remains nothing further to be done. On the basis of the above submission, the Crl.R.P. is closed. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE Cdp/-