:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.297 OF 2007 PETITION NO.297 OF 2007 PETITION NO.297 OF 2007 Shri Haresh Damodar Parmar ... Petitioner. V/s. Wintex Mills. ... Respondent. .... Mr. V.Y. Sanglikar for the Petitioner. .... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. 15TH 15TH 15TH JANUARY 2007. JANUARY 2007. JANUARY 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. The impugned order warrants no interference. At this stage although the amendment was filed rather belatedly. It is always open to the Petitioner to challenge the impugned order from final decree, if necessary. 2. Needless to add that the Petitioner shall be entitled to meet the amended case in any manner that the Petitioner is entitled to including by amending the pleading or leading further evidence or recalling witnesses. The Trial Court no doubt will ensure that the matter is not needlessly delayed on account of the amendment. 3. The Petition is disposed of. ----