1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 10102 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 10102 OF 2010 *** 1. Heard Mr. Surve for Petitioner, Advocate Mr. Sudhir Patil for Respondent No.1, Advocate Mr. Dhoble for Respondent No.2. 2. After hearing respective counsel for quite sometime, it is noticed that order dated 4th August, 2010 has been passed by College Tribunal without extending to petitioner an opportunity of hearing. The learned counsel for Respondent No.1 has pointed out that no say was filed and, therefore, the Tribunal has proceeded to pass that order. According to Advocate Mr. Surve when he reached Tribunal to file reply the order was already passed. 3. I do not find it necessary to go into disputed aspects of the controversy. Interest of justice can be met with by permitting petitioner to file his say before the College Tribunal and the College Tribunal 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 10102 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. shall, thereafter, decide application for intervention moved by Respondent No.1 afresh after giving parties an opportunity of hearing. Appropriate decision in this respect shall be taken as early as possible. Subject to this, the impugned order dated 4th August, 2010 is quashed and set aside. No costs. 4. As parties state that College Tribunal has not given any date for further hearing, the parties are permitted to mention the matter before the College Tribunal on 7th April, 2011. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:22/03/2011. ans/10102