1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. C.A.S. NO. 256/09 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 411 OF 2008. Ishwar Shivankar .vs. Narendra Thakre ________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders. Registrars orders. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATED : APRIL 2, 2009. Heard Ms. Udeshi, learned Counsel for the applicant. The learned Advocate submits that under bonafide mistake name of respondent Narendra Thakare was shown in the title clause in Second Appeal No. 411/08. The learned Advocate further submits that after the knowledge of the fact that sole respondent Narendra Thakare expired on 12.8.2004, an application was moved and the said application was allowed. The learned Counsel who was representing the legal representatives was also heard. It was also submitted by the learned Advocate that the steps were taken with due care and caution and there was no delay caused in taking the steps. The legal representatives are already brought on record and as such, the applicant seeks permission to effect the change in title clause and substitute the legal representatives on record. In view of the submissions made by the learned advocate and in the interest of justice, the application is allowed. The applicant is permitted to carry out necessary amendments by 9.4.2009. Issue fresh notice to the respondents returnable on 8.6.2009. J. JUDGE.