IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 3RD OCTOBER 2008 / 11TH ASWINA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 320 of 2008(S) ------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.11782/2005 Dated 11/10/2007 .................................................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ------------------------------ M/S.GEO TECH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, 8TH FLOOR, KSHB COMPLEX, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, D.L.N.RAO, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O.MADHAVA RAO, DIRECTOR, M/S.GEO TECH CONSTRUCTION CO.(P) LTD. 8TH FLOOR, KSHB COMPLEX, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI. BY ADV. SRI.KAPPILLIL ANILKUMAR SMT.P.A.JASMIN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: -------------------------------- D.DATTA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S.WATER & POWER CONSULTANCY SERVICES (INDIA) LTD. 9, COMMUNITY CENTRE, SAKET, NEW DELHI 110 017. ADV. SRI.P.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR SRI.K.JOSE KURIAKOSE SRI.C.S.DIAS ADV. SRI. P. PARAMESWARAN NAIR, ASG THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = C.O.C. No. 320 OF 2008 S = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 3rd day of October 2008 J U D G M E N T Disobedience of Annexure I judgment in W.P.(C) No. 11782/05 is complained of. 2. By the judgment this Court disposed of the writ petition directing that the admitted amount due to the petitioner for soil investigation work shall be paid. Going by the counter affidavit, an amount of Rs.1,65,868/- has been paid to the petitioner. According to the respondent this payment is in full satisfaction of the petitioner's claim. If, on the other hand, the petitioner has a claim for any further amount, that is a matter to be established by the petitioner in appropriate proceedings. But then, having regard to the fact that only admitted amount has been ordered to be paid and that such amount has since been paid I do not think that there is any warrant for initiating any proceedings under the Contempt of Court Act against the respondent. Therefore, the contempt is closed leaving it open to pursue the claim of the petitioner, if any, for further amount in appropriate proceedings. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-