IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.798 of 2008 M/S AYESHA EXPORTS Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- For the Petitioner : M/s Santosh Kr.Singh and Sanjeev Kr.Mishra. For the Union of India : Dr. Ravi Ranjan,Assistant Solicitor General Mr. Shaialendra Kr.Singh , Central Government Counsel 4 8.5.08 In my view, this contempt application has now become in fructuous. In the Writ application, which challenges the validity of the notification of the Central Government restricting import of betel nuts, this Court had passed an interim order staying the notification of the Central Government and referred the matter to a Division Bench for final consideration. Notwithstanding the interim stay granted by this Court, the opposite party did not feel persuaded to implement the order of this Court and choose to refer the matter to higher authority holding that the order had been obtained from the Court on mis-representation of facts . This was notwithstanding the fact that the Assistant Solicitor General was assisting the Court on behalf of the Central Government and the Central Government had filed a counter affidavit in the matter. This led to institution of the present proceeding. When this Court asked the officer concerned to be personally present in the Court, the officer concerned realized his mistake and tendered unconditional apology. Custom Department has since issued orders permitting the petitioner to import betel nuts from Jogbani. 2 Learned Assistant Solicitor General also brought to the notice to this Court that the Division Bench to which the writ petition had been referred by this Court for final disposal , has finally heard the matter and allowed the writ petition and quashed the notification of the Government. It is now under the said circumstances that there is no legal impediment in importing the betel nuts from Jogbani. The apology, as unconditionally tendered by the officer concerned, is accepted and the proceedings are discharged. Singh (Navaniti Prasad Singh)