IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16585 of 2008 RAHUL KUMAR MADHESHIA & ANR Versus BIHAR SCHOOL EXAM.BOARD & ANR ----------- 2. 17.02.2009 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the State. The prayer in this application is for a direction to the respondent authorities to re-evaluate the answer sheet of the petitioner in certain papers of the Intermediate Examination 2008. The grievance is that despite the petitioner having applied for re-evaluation in the manner prescribed and deposit of necessary fees, no steps were being taken in that regard. The Supreme Court has held in Pramod Kumar Srivastava Versus Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission, Patna and others (2004) 6 SCC 714 that any application for re- evaluation has to be considered strictly in terms of the statutory provisions regulating the same. Learned Counsel for the Board submits that steps have already been taken in accordance with law. This writ application is disposed off with a direction to the respondent Board to pass final orders in accordance with law on the application of the petitioner and communicate the same to the petitioner expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)