IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 3340 of 2010 Date of decision: September 14, 2011 Rajesh Kumar .. Petitioner Vs. Piryadarshani @ Darshan and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate for Mr. P.S. Jammu, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J This petition assails the order dated 22.7.2010 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sirsa, allowing the petition filed by the respondents herein and awarding a sum of `1000/- per month as maintenance to each of the respondents who are wife and minor child of the petitioner. The trial court while assessing the income as `4000/- per month appears to have rightly awarded maintenance to the tune `1000/- per month as the petitioner is duty bound to maintain his wife and child who have no source of income to maintain themselves. The quantum of maintenance is too meager to be interfered with. Dismissed. September 14, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge