^ gs»&'^ ^ ^ y dj^ \^. XN THB HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR ICGI WRIT PETITION (S) N0, ^ ^ ^ /2010 WRIT PBTITION U/A 226 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITXOHER RESPONDENTS ^..< .^. .^M<9 ^\r\^'^ y ^.^^/- / ^ ^^ ' ^./' / <fy ^ / Smt. Neelmani Thakur, W/o Munnu Singh Thakur, aged about 52 years, occupation - Asst. Teacher, Presently working as - Head Master, Govt. Primary School — Shahpur, Tahsil - Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through ~ Secretar;^ Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchalnalaya, Directorate, Raipur 3. Distt. Education Officer, Distt. Raigarh (CG) 4. Block Education Officer, Block - Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) 78 - ^f7^¥T^T f<^i<=h "^^T ^n^i 5h^i^ '3~^[ ^I^IM^ ^ttl^^Ko, [®1^8<r<^< ^^^^....W..Q.:)...2£^....^^ ^TT^T "q^^ ( ^1?^<^T) Q^ ^^TW^rfi^^TT^ <=M^fd<fll 'HR^ff ^f f^st <F3l<^l< ^^tRma^T SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra ndohan Shrivastava, J. 21-06-2010 )I petitioner is entitled to benefit| Shri A.N. Bhakta, couns^l for the petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel l^awyer for the State/respondents. Heard. Learned counsel appearjing for the petitioner submits that the of two advance increments on account of she having passed B.T.I. exa|mination before her appointment at her lei own cost. It is submitted that tjhe issue involved in the present petition is no longer res integra and th|e same has been finally decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the & Ors., 2009 fIID MPJR fSC) ^ It is further submitted tl view in its order dated 06-02-3 ^ase of Asha Saxena vs. StateofM.P. 9. hiat this Court has also taken a similar |009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned counsel for the petitio^ier further draws attention ofthis Court to order dated 29-04-2010 p^ssed in Writ Appeal No. 124 of 2009, wherein relying upon the judgr|ient of the Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the Writ Appeal No.87/2009, direc order passed by this Court in another dons have been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two a^vance increments as per circular dated 21-09-1974 issued by the Stat^ ofMadhya Pradesh, after verification of the facts pleaded in the petitioiJL. p^;-^ ^^-fTT^, /^y\ ^^>'-';^ XI-HG—78^-"^' 3TI^T ^T f^TM? ^T^ ^H^T s^^jeh' INIIIIIIIII l^ Praveen ll '3~ocr ^iqi^^^ ^til^^Ko, M<rii'H^< WR^ST^W?^ "^ 200 3n^r Tra^ (y<?3<si<^T) ^HW^f^T3T^T ^ Learned counsel for th^ petitioner would also be consid^ In view of the statemedit disposed off with a direction to| and decide the claim of thel increments as per circular da1| Madhya Pradesh, after verifica^ within a period of eight weeks fi| <=nf^(<n<flyi 'R7^?f ^f 'fexst <Fai<^j< ^3ff?R3T?^T respondents submits that case of the red on the same lines. made above, this petition is finally the respondent authorities to consider petitioner for grant of two advance .ed 21-09-1974 issued by the State of lon of the facts pleaded in the petition •om today. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge i^ir"!?-^ T TTI^I ";3-?-:?"-:" _«^l_.__ -,„..__.._.„.,_...._