IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.391 of 2009 Date of decision: 17.9.2009 Bihara Singh ......Petitioner(s) Versus Smt. Poonam Pandey and another ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Raj Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.C. Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) CWP No.7212 of 2007 was allowed vide judgment dated 10.3.2008 passed by this Court and the petitioner was held entitled to the grant of pension from the date of his retirement along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the delayed payment. It not in dispute that the aforesaid order of this Court has been complied with and the petitioner has been paid the pension and arrears along with interest. However, contention of the petitioner is that his pension has not been fixed correctly and some recovery has also been illegally ordered against him. Be that as it may, in view of the fact that the order passed by this Court has been complied with, I am not inclined to proceed further in this petition. Rule discharged. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the basis of fixation of his pension at a lesser rate and order of recovery passed against him in accordance with law. September 17, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE