IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.317 of 2010 Mamta Devi, daughter of Surendra Sah, resident of Mohalla Parwati Hata, Bhatta Bazar, P.S. K.Hat, District- Purnea ……….. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2.K.K.Pathak, the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Human Resources Department, Bihar, Patna 3.Mr.Ashutosh, the Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Department, Bihar, Patna 4.Mr. Sridhar, the District Magistrate, Purnea 5.Mathura Ram, the District Superintendent of Education, Purnea 6.Sri Pramod Kumar Paswan, the Regional Education Officer-cum-Secretary, Teacher Employment Selection Board, Dagarua Block, District- Purnea ………. Opp.Parties ----------- 2. 03/11/2010 As the petitioner was appointed during the pendency of her writ application, the same was disposed of as infructuous with liberty to raise her grievances for consideration of her case before the appropriate authority in respect of giving her benefit of service for the purpose of seniority from the date her juniors from the same merit list were appointed. In the light of the said order, petitioner filed representation before the Executive Officer, vide Annexure-7, in which she raised main grievance with regard to her transfer rather than counting her services for the purpose of seniority vis-à-vis her juniors, who were appointed from the same 2 merit list. Her representation has been rejected by the Executive Officer vide Annexure-R/1 to the show cause. Since petitioner confused the matter by raising grievance substantially in respect of her posting, the opposite parties perhaps did not examine her case for grant of benefit of length of service for the purpose of seniority from the date her juniors were appointed from the same merit list. This matter requires independent consideration and therefore, petitioner is given liberty to file representation specifically for this purpose before the concerned authority. With this observation, this contempt application is disposed of. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)