^ / ^ L IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Second Appeal No. ^51@I& /2006 APPELLANT PLAINTIFF FFROM DISTMCT RAIPUR1 Mohd. Ikramulla S/o Abdul Sattar, aged about 70 years, Resident of Chhotapara, Raipur, Post, Tahsil and Disfrict Raipur [C.G.]. RESPONDENTS VBRSUS The Nagar Palik Nigam, Raipur, DEFENDANTS J^? 'i^ Throu§h~ Commissioner, Nagar PalikNigam, Raipur [C.G.]. , ^}^ Mutwalli, JamaMasjid, $ ^^J Bairan Bazaar, Raipur [C.G.]. SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF CIVIL f/^ ^ PROCEDURE CODE y XI-HC-78 ^n^T^rl^Tt^ cTSTTW^T^icb ^< *11*1Wl $h+1ich 3^T r^NKn^, ^Tfl^^Ko, [cKrtl^y ,^..^...^...,^200^ 311^1 ^5icb (^qi^q^) ^RTT^R: ^Tf?cT 3T1^T Kumar 04.12.2006 Siri Mday appellant/pldntiff. Shri Kasif Shakeel, Coun^ Shri Syed Imtlyaz ^!i\ Shri Malay Kumar appellant/pldntiff seeks permit Jiberty to take recourse to such under J^?. Counsel for the responde^ Resepvmg the oforesaid Appeal is dismissed GS withdrawh M.C.P.No.1245 of 2006 Act, for condonation ofdefay, I.^.No.2311 of 2006 for i <=bi^?Qi4iri ^i^^T^fe^<f^^i< ^3Tf^T3TT^T Bhoduri, Counsel for the |ej for the respondent bto.l. Cc|unsel for the respondent No.2. Bh^durl, learned counsel for the 55?on to ^jthdrmi? this appeot with {egcl remedy, as may be av&flabJe |tts formatly oppose the prayer. iberty, as prayed for, this Second fliled Q}SO ^^ under Sectton 5 of Limitation !|so stands dismissed. 4rgent hewing stands disposed of. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge P.T.O.