IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 22ND MAY 2009 / 1ST JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 11827 of 2009(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- P.V.BABY, S/O.VARKEY, AGED 38 YEARS, PUTHENPARAMBIL HOUSE, VANNAPPURAM KARA, VANNAPPURAM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN SRI.RAJU SEBASTIAN VADAKKEKKARA RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALIYAR POLICE STATION, VANNAPPURAM P.O., THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 3. JALAJAN, S/O.KURIAKOSE, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, CHEMPAKATHINAL HOUSE, VANNAPPURAM VILLAGE, VANNAPPURAM KARA, THODUPUZHA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT. WP(C) 11827/2009 2 4. KURIAKOSE, S/O.MATHAI, AGED ABOUT 65, CHEMPAKATHINAL HOUSE, VANNAPPURAM KARA, THODUPUZHA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM FOR R3-4 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.A. SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) 11827/2009 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 12.1.2008. EXT.P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 28.1.2009 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE DYSP, THODUPUZHA. EXT.P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 28.3.2009. EXT.P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE LOCAL PEOPLE BEFORE THE DYSP, THODUPUZHA, DATED 20.3.2009. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. // TRUE COPY // P.S. TO JUDGE. KNC/- P.R. RAMAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) NO. 11827 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 22ND DAY OF MAY, 2009. J U D G M E N T Raman, J. There is already an interim direction to maintain law and order by the appellants. The facts disclosed during the course of argument shows that five cents of property was sold by the 4th respondent to the petitioner and some disputes are there regarding a pathway and some civil suits are pending. According to the petitioner, the party respondents are creating all sorts of problems to him. It is not necessary to go in to such details. In the light of the interim direction, we do not think any further direction is required to be passed for maintaining peace. As regarding the pending disputes, if any, between the parties of civil nature, it is open to them to approach the civil court, if not already approached. The interim order will continue. The writ petition is closed. P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE. KNC/-