CWP No.2401 of 2008. 21.11.2008 Present: Mr. K.S. Banyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1. This writ petition is directed against the order of the Director, Consolidation of Holdings only with respect to khasra No.58. The petitioner has filed a revision under Section 54 of the HP Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1971. At the time of arguments there were two khasra numbers involved in the revision. With respect to khasra No.59 the petitioner has entered into a compromise. As far as khasra No.58 is concerned, best efforts were made by the authorities concerned for compromise, but they could not succeed. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has ‘GOSHALA” on khasra No.58. Therefore, there was no question of entering into a compromise and the same cannot be taken away in proceedings under the Consolidation of Holdings Act. This Court cannot enter into the question of facts, which is the jurisdiction of the revenue authorities. However, we find that as far as khasra No.58 is concerned the entry against the same is “Gair Maroosi”, it means non- occupancy tenant. In such circumstances, this Court is of the view that -2- there is no jurisdictional error which can be examined by this Court. Accordingly, no interference is warranted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and the writ petition is dismissed, so also the pending application. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. November 21, 2008. ( Kuldip Singh ), J. (rc)