IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.34370 of 2010 1. Deena Nath Pd., son of Yogendra Pd. 2. Subhash Pd., son of umashankar Pd., 3. Sanjeev Pd., son of Umashankar Pd. Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar OP ----------- 2/- 9.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the State. Petitioners, namely, Deena Nath Pd., Subhash Pd., and Sanjeev Pd., apprehend their arrest in connection with Sursand P.S. Case No.92 of 2010, registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 342, 323, 324/307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners is that they assaulted the informant with khanti and other weapons on account of dispute of construction of Pakka wall on the Aam Rasta. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that as a matter of fact informant tried to prevent the petitioners from entering into their land and moreover the informant has received simple injury, which is evident from perusal of annexure-5 of this 2 application. He also points out that the case has already been compromised between the parties, which is evident from the perusal of Annexure -6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within 30 days from receipt of the order, the petitioners, named above shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sursand P.S. Case No.92 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. Ashwini/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)