1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 615 OF 2009 Sau. Vimalbai Narayan Patil and others .. .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. .. Respondents Shri N. B. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri B. V. Wagh, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4. CORAM : B. R. GAVAI, AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 15TH SEPTEMBER, 2009. ORAL ORDER [Per B. R. Gavai, J. ] : 1. The petitioner takes exception to the order dated 14th October, 2008 passed by the learned member of respondent No. 2 Commission thereby rejecting the complaint of the petitioner on the ground that, the complaint of the present petitioner's son was filed. 2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader has placed on record a copy of the communication addressed by the Secretary of the learned Commission, wherein it is stated that, the complaint was 2 not decided on merits, but was decided on technical grounds and that the Commission was willing to decide the case on merits. Same is taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. In that view of the matter the grievance of the petitioner does not survive. Hence the petition is disposed of. 3. Needless to state that, the learned Commission would dispose of the complaint filed by the present petitioner on merits as expeditiously as possible within a period of three months from today. The petitioners to remain present before the learned Commission on 08th October, 2009 and if it is convenient the learned Commission may take up the matter for hearing on the same date. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ B. R. GAVAI, J.] bsb/Sept. 09