IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND JUNE 2011 / 1ST ASHADHA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 271 of 2011(S) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- SUBIN THOMAS, KOTTAYIL HOUSE PALAKKATHAKIDY PO, KUNNAMTHANAM VILLAGE MALLAPPALLY TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.T.P.PRADEEP RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE C.I.OFFICE, MALLAPPALLY, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT- 689 585. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEEZHVAYPUR POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT- 689 587. 3. BLESSON THOMAS KOCHUPURACKAL HOUSE, PALAKKATHAKIDY PO, KUNNAMTHANAM VILLAGE, MALLAPPALLY TALUK -689 681. R1 & R2 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.K.BABU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPCR NO.271/2011: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1.TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS EVIDENCING THE INTIMATE RELATION OF MS.NISSY SOSA THOMAS WITH PETITIONER AND HIS RELATIVES. EXT.P2A.TRUE COPY OF THE LOVE LETTER. EXT.P2B.TRUE COPY OF THE LOVE LETTER. EXT.P3.TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT PREFERRED TO THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 24.5.2011. K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(Crl.) No. 271 of 2011-S ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 22nd day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a writ of Habeas Corpus for production of Ms.Nissy Sosa Thomas, the alleged detenue who is the sister of the 3rd respondent. According to the petitioner, petitioner and the sister of the 3rd respondent were in love for the last four years. They decided to get married. Ext.P1 is the photograph and Ext.P2 are the love letters. It is stated that the 3rd respondent is against the marriage of the petitioner with the alleged detenue since the petitioner belongs to Christian Orthodox community. There is reference to phone call made by the alleged detenue. Petitioner filed Ext.P3 complaint. 2. Today, the alleged detenue was present before us. We interacted with her. We also interacted with the petitioner. The alleged detenue would say that there is no illegal detention and that she does not want to go with the petitioner. In such circumstances, we close the Writ Petition (Criminal). (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS