IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24913 of 2008 CHANDAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 9.9.2008 Heard. The only basis for keeping the petitioner in confinement is 164 Cr. P.C. statement of Md. Rafeul Hoda and Surkhab Ahmad. On perusal of para-67 of the case diary, containing the above noted statement, the name of the petitioner is not found there. Another victim in para-68 of the case diary has named this petitioner. The contention is that as appears from the facts of the case also that the two victims had been abducted simultaneously and were confined at one place and appeared running away at the same point of time but one of them has named this petitioner. Further contention is that persons who are named in the F.I.R. were not sent up for trial. Let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C No.v, Jamui, District Jamui, in Sessions Trial no.318 of 2007 arising out of Jamui P.S. case no.255 of 2005. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )