THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2225 of 2008 ORDER: Though the matter is listed under the caption ‘interlocutory’, at the request of the learned counsel for both the parties, the writ petition itself is taken up for hearing and being disposed of by this order. In this writ petition, petitioners questioned notice, dated 26.09.2006 issued by the respondent in Rc.No.A3/286/06. Aforesaid notice was issued to conduct survey and demarcation with regard to Survey Nos.101, 102, 103, 104/1, 110 and 111 situated at Kondapur Village, Serlingampalli Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, on 06.10.2006 at 11.30 a.m. When the matter is taken up, it is submitted that pursuant to the impugned notice, demarcation was done by drafting a panchanama. The impugned notice is the one for conducting demarcation on 06.10.2006 and in pursuance thereof, demarcation has already been carried out. In view of the same, no further directions need be issued in this writ petition. However, it is always open to the petitioners to question such demarcation report, but I do not find any illegality in the impugned notice, which was only intimation for conducting demarcation. In that view of the matter, keeping open to the petitioners to question the demarcation, if they are so aggrieved, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 24th JUNE, 2011. kvni