IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 22ND MAGHA 1930 RP.No. 78 of 2009() --------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.21150/2008 Dated 15/07/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ---------------------------------------------- RANI AGED 41 YEARS, W/O.JIJI JOHN, CHALAKKAMATH HOUSE, PAZHUKKARA P.O., ANNALOOR, THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN SMT.P.R.REENA RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------- MALA GRAMAPANCHAYATH, REPRSENTED BY SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH OFFICE , MALA, THRISSUR DIST. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== R.P.NO. 78 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) NO. 21150 OF 2008 (P) ==================== Dated this the 11th day of February, 2009 O R D E R The main ground on which review is sought is that what the petitioner wanted to construct was a shed for the purpose of her hollow brick manufacturing unit and not a “residential house” as mentioned in the first sentence in the judgment. 2. A reading of the writ petition and the review petition shows that the expression 'residential house' used in the first sentence of the judgment is erroneous. Therefore the word 'residential house' in the first sentence of the judgment will stand deleted and substituted by the word 'shed'. Review petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp