IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2009 / 17TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 11410 of 2009(U) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------------- FREDY SABU, AGED 23, S/O. SABU THOMAS, EDATTUKARAN HOUSE, MALA P.O., NEAR MALAKULAM, THRISSUR -680732. BY ADV. SRI.C.T.JOSEPH SRI.JOE POLLAYIL SRI.ROSHIN IPE JOSEPH RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM REPRESENTED BY VICE CHANCELLOR. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G UNIVERSITY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/04/2009 ALONG WITH WPC NO.11411/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------------- W.P.(C).Nos.11410 & 11411 OF 2009 ------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of April, 2009. JUDGMENT In these writ petitions the petitioners complain of delay on the part of the respondent University in completing the revaluation sought for by them. 2. Petitioner in WP(c).No.11410/09 is a student of B. Tech Electrical and Communications. It is stated that he applied for revaluation of the paper Advanced Microprocessors of the 8th semester. 3. Although application has not been produced, Ext.P3 shows the remittance of the fee in this behalf. 4. In so far as the petitioner in WP(c).No.11411/09 is concerned, he applied for revaluation of the paper, Electrical Drives and Controls of the 7th semester. Ext.P6 is the application filed for revaluation and by Ext.P7 he sought scrutiny also. WP(c).No.11410/09 & anor. /2/ 5. The common complaint of the petitioners is regarding delay on the part of the respondent University in completing the proceedings. 6. I heard the standing counsel appearing for the respondent also. 7. Having regard to the submissions made by both sides, it is directed that if valid and proper applications have been received from the petitioners herein, revaluation sought for by them shall be expedited and completed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 8 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. 8. In so far as the petitioner in WP(c).No.11411/09 is concerned, it is directed that once revaluation is completed scrutiny sought for by him shall also be allowed. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondent University for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.11410/09 & anor. /2/