IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 895 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 438 OF 2009 THE UNDER SECRETARY (PERSONNEL-I) ... Applicant Versus SHRI KASHINATH SHETYE ... Respondent Shri S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. G. Bhonsule, Additional Government Advocate for the Applicant. Shri Ryan Menezes, Advocate forthe Original Petitioner. Shri H. D. Naik, Advocate for Respondent No.10. Shri Nigel Costa Frias, Advocate for the Intervener. Coram:- SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 26th November, 2009 P.C.:- Heard. This application pertains to the extension of service of one Shantaram Shenoy who is working as a Comptroller in Raj Bhavan. He was brought on deputation, and his deputation period expired on 30-9-2009. It is stated that in April, 2009, efforts were made to bring another person on deputation and out of five persons interviewed, three were ineligible and the remaining two were found not to be suitable. It appears that there is also a flaw in the Recruitment Rules as there is no feeder post. Considering the facts stated, we are inclined to give a period of four months to extend the services of the said Shantaram Shenoy. We make it clear that no further extension would be given and Raj Bhavan will make necessary arrangements to get another incumbent to fill the post either on deputation or as permissible under the Rules. Application disposed off. SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.