*1* ss.1109.09 kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.1109 OF 2009 UCO Bank. ..Plaintiff -Versus- Romil Mukesh Doctor and others. ..Defendants .......... M.R.Patel, for the Plaintiff. .......... CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 26th November, 2010. P.C. 1 The Plaintiff bank has filed this suit for recovery of the sum stated in the prayer clause, on the basis of the written contract evidenced by the application for sanction of education loan, letter of sanction, demand promissory note and the acknowledgments in writing. The Defendant No.1 is a principal borrower and the Defendant Nos.2 and 3 are guarantors. The amount payable is reflected in the statement of account maintained by the Plaintiff bank in its ordinary and regular course of business. 2 On account becoming irregular, a letter of demand has been issued which has been duly served but there is no response. 3 I am satisfied from the averments in the plaint that this suit is maintainable as a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Civil Procedure Code. The Defendants are residing within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court and the claim of the Plaintiff is within limitation. 4 For all these reasons, the affidavit proving service is taken on record and marked “X” for identification and the original documents *2* ss.1109.09 compiled in compilation are also taken on record and marked “X-1”. There will be a decree as prayed for. The Advocate’s costs be computed as per rules. Refund of the Court fees as per rules. 5 Needless to state that while drawing a decree, the registry to make appropriate adjustment of the amount paid by the Defendants during the pendency of the suit. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)