(1) ca13433-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13433 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2658 OF 2004 Chandrashekhar Ramchandra Balwatkar APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. V.D. Patnoorkar, advocate holding for Mr. A.S. Golegaonkar, advocate for the applicant. Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. Mr. P.S. Patil, advocate for Respondent No. 2. Mr. S.A. Kulkarni, advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 & 5. ..... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 16th NOVEMBER, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. We do not find that the relief claimed in the present application i.e. directing the Bank authorities not to act upon the Notice issued under the provisions of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, can be granted. In any case, this relief claimed in the Civil Application has no nexus with the subject matter of the main petition. In that view of the matter, the Civil Application is (2) ca13433-11 rejected. 2. Insofar as the prayer for fixing the main petition for final hearing at an early date is concerned, the petitioner would be at liberty to apply after December vacation. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] npj/ca13433-11