1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 359 OF 2008 Premdas Laxman Bagade .vs. Shriram Swamy Shikshan Sanstha & others ________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders. Registrars orders. Ms. P.D. Rane, Advocate for the appellant. CORAM: D.K. DESHMUKH & PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2008. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant. Perused the record. It is clear that even on the date on which the services were terminated, the petitioner did not have training qualification. The circular relied on by the petitioner permitted him to acquire qualification by 1.6.1996. Admittedly, by that date, he did not have training qualification. In our opinion, therefore, entertaining and allowing teachers like petitioners would be prejudicial to the interest of the students because then the Court will be forcing on the students teachers who do not have training qualification. In our opinion, substantial justice has been done by the order of the learned Single Judge. No interference is called for. The Letters Patent Appeal is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE. J.