CWP 1889 of 2007. 9.12.2010 Present: Mr. S.C.Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Asstt. AG, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Shrawan Dogra, counsel for respondent No. 2. Respondent No. 1, i.e. the State of H.P., issued Notification, dated 22.3.2007, Annexure P-1, indicating that the State proposed to include certain areas of Gram Panchayats, Racholi, Shingla and Bharawali in Nagar Parishad, Rampur Bushahar. Petitioner, who is the resident of village Racholi, filed the present writ petition, challenging that notification. In the writ petition, it is alleged that the areas of the aforesaid Panchayats cannot be merged with Nagar Parishad, Rampur, as that would reduce the area of Panchayats and will cause a number of hardships to the residents of the Panchayats. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the counsel, representing the respondents, and gone through the record. Government has issued the notification, with regard to its proposal to include some areas of the aforesaid Panchayats. The notification speaks of calling objections from the people of the Panchayats, named above and taking final decision, only after consideration of such objections. No decision has been taken by the Government, vide Annexure P-1, for merger of any area of any Panchayat -2- in the Nagar Parishad of Rampur. There is only a proposal and objections from the people of the area have been invited. Thus, the writ petition is pre mature. The same is, therefore, dismissed. December 9, 2010(PC). (Surjit Singh), J.+