-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.4670 OF 2007 PETITION NO.4670 OF 2007 PETITION NO.4670 OF 2007 Seva Sadan Society & anr. ...Petitioners vs. Mehernoz D. Kelawala ...Respondent WITH WITH WITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.4679 OF 2007 PETITION NO.4679 OF 2007 PETITION NO.4679 OF 2007 Seva Sadan Society & anr. ...Petitioners vs. Mrs.Dinoo F. Daver ...Respondent WITH WITH WITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.4688 OF 2007 PETITION NO.4688 OF 2007 PETITION NO.4688 OF 2007 Seva Sadan Society & anr. ...Petitioners vs. Mrs.Gool J. Satta ...Respondent Mr.Sandesh Deshpande i/b M/s.Haresh Mehta for the Petitioners Ms Ranjana Parekh for Respondent CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : MAY 2, 2008. : MAY 2, 2008. : MAY 2, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Petitioners and the Advocate for the Respondent. The Petitioners have filed this Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India challenging the order passed by the learned Judge of the Small Causes Court at Mumbai by which the interim notice taken out by the -2- Petitioners (original plaintiffs) has been dismissed. The challenge is also to the confirmation of the said order by the Appeal Bench of the Small Causes Court in a Revision application filed by the Petitioners. 2. The petitioners are the original Plaintiffs in a suit for eviction filed against the Respondents. In the said suit, an interim notice was taken out seeking a direction against the Respondent to deposit arrears of the rent and to continue to deposit the future rent in the court. The second prayer in the notice is for expediting the hearing of the suit. The said notice has been dismissed on the ground that the interim rent has been fixed in the standard rent application filed by the Respondent-tenant and the said standard rent application is pending in which the Respondent-tenant is required to deposit the interim rent. 3. The orders impugned are purely interlocutory orders. Moreover, it is mentioned across the bar that the suit is now ready for hearing. The impugned orders do not decide the rights and liabilities of the parties. No interference is called in a writ petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India. Petitions are rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE