IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3133 of 2003 1. SUNIL KUMAR JHA , son of late Uday Kant Jha, resident of village Kharhara, P. S. Barahat, District- Banka, at present posted as Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Baidyanathpur, Anchal Banka, P.S. & District- Banka. 2. Anil Kumar son of late Krishna Pd. Mandal resident of village Ajit Nagar, P. O. Manjhauri, P.S. Rajaun, District- Banka, at present posted as Assistant Teacher in Primary School, Bindi, Anchal- Banka, PS & District Banka. 3. Krishna Mohan Sharma, son of late Nunu Lal Mistry, resident of village- Oriya, P. O. Barahat District-Banka, at present posted as Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Tetariya, Anchal + P.S. Bounshi, District- Banka. 4. Durganand Mishra, son of late Dharmveer Mishra, resident of village- Magarpatti, P.S. Rajnagar, District- Madhubani, at present posted as Assistant Teacher in Primary School, Choubeydihi, P.S. Barhat, District- Banka. 5. Madhuri Jha, w/o Late Kapildeo Jha, resident of village- Kharhara, P.S. Barahat, District- Banka, at present posted as Assistant Teacher in Primary School, Charua Kanya barahat, District- Banka. 6. Dilip Kumar Singh, son of late Upendra Narayan Singh, at & P.O. Kumardih, PS. Shambhuganj, District- Banka, at present posted as Assistant Teacher in Primary School, Mal bathani, Anchal- Katoriya, District- Banka. … Petitioners. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Banka, District- Banka. 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Banka, District- Banka. .. Respondents. ----------- 3. 04.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The following prayer of the petitioners made in this writ petition “1. That this writ application is being filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for a direction to respondent to pay the arrear of salary to the petitioners during the period of teachers training and further direction to respondents to pay the arrears of salary 2 during the period their services in training with compound interest and further give other legal consequential benefit attached to the post.” has been allowed by the respondents themselves as would be apparent from Annexure A and B to the counter affidavit. Considering the aforementioned aspect, learned counsel for the petitioners does not intend to press this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)