wp1500­11.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1500 OF 2011 Shankar Bhau Pawar .. Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors .. Respondents Mr.Ajit Kenjale for the petitioner. Mr.R.M.Apte, A.G.P for respondent Nos.1 to 4. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 17th JUNE 2011. P.C.: . Heard Mr.Kenjale appearing on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner cannot have any grievance in respect of the impugned orders which are made during the course of inserting revenue entries. The petitioner’s substantive civil suit is pending. Merely because some revenue entries are made does not mean that the petitioner’s case as set out in the plaint in the said suit and his assertion of right, title and interest in the immovable property is adversely affected. Ultimately, the authorities under wp1500­11.doc 2 the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code will have to abide by the final orders in civil proceedings. In such circumstances, the remedy of the petitioner to obtain appropriate reliefs in the pending civil suit, not being adversely affected and all contentions in that behalf being always open, there is no reason to interfere under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. No costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)