1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.71 OF 2009. Shri Dnyaneshwar Maroti Nishane Vs. Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal and another .......................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................... Shri S.A. Mohta, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2011. This matter was listed on 23.09.2011, on which date Shri Mohta, the learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2, pointed out that the revision has been preferred by the petitioner before Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, which is pending. The petition has been preferred because the learned Member of Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal was not available. He submits that now the post is occupied and the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal is functioning. Hence, the revision pending before Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal can be decided. In the light of this position, an order was passed on 23.09.2011 as under: “Learned AGP for respondent no.1. .....2/- 2 Mr. Mohta, the learned h/f Shri R.K. Khapre, Advocate, appears for respondent no.2. None for the petitioner. Put up on 30.09.2011.” Today also when the matter was called out, none appears for the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid position, the writ petition is dismissed. The petitioner is at liberty to prosecute the revision pending before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal. JUDGE NSN ...../-