1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION No. 2422/2011 Moreshwar Natthuji Padole -versus- Special Social Welfare Officer and another. __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 10, 2011. Heard finally by consent of Shri Ambilwade, learned Counsel for petitioner, Shri Parihar, learned A.G.P.for respondent No.1 and Shri Sudame, learned Counsel for respondent no.2. Rule, returnable forthwith. The petitioner who is aged about 64 years and has superannuated about 4 years back, is seeking pension. 2 Shri Sudame, learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.2 states that the petitioner has not filled up necessary papers and in any case as he is being prosecuted for defalcation, he is not entitled to pension. Learned A.G.P. appearing for respondent no.1 states that after appropriate papers and facts are received, respondent no.1 is ready and willing to consider the entitlement of petitioner in accordance with law. Without going into any disputed questions, we direct the petitioner to approach respondent no.2 within a period of three weeks from today and to sign necessary papers for clearance of his pension. After such papers are signed, respondent no.2 shall forward the same to respondent no.1 within a further period of two weeks. Respondent no.1 shall then consider the same in accordance with law and take a decision as early as possible and in any case within a period of six weeks thereafter. 3 Petition is thus partly allowed. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms, with no orders as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE Rgd.