k Q) A) f )1 i?// C, WW ‘séE‘-mmm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No. «M ’L‘v m /2009 «"M’ (Aiiis/ing out of order dated 01/ 12/2009 passed in W.P.(S)No. 1672/2000 Kale Khan Versus State of M.P. and others by Single Bench Hon’ble Shri N. K. Agrawal J. Whereby the dismissing the case for want of prosecution) 3) Upper Collector, 6,, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur M.P. §¢) Lakhan Lal S/o Lati Ram Satnami, resident of Gram Dhobnidih, Tah Bilai Garh, District Raipur M.P. APPLICATION FOR RE§TORATION m MM OF W.P NO. 16?,“2wi2000 WHICH HAS BEEN DISMISSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT ON 01 / 12/2009 FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION w” \ APPLICANT 7-—-— “v : /" Kale Khan aged about 71 years, “v S/o ‘of Peer Khan Mohammad, Pad/V37 resident of Mouza Bhatgaon, 1 Tahsil Bilai Garh, District Raipur M.P. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1) State of M.P. / f/ Through : Collector, Raipur M.P. 2) Sub—Divisional Officers, W” Bilai Garh, District Raipur M.P. 3.3. Hon’Me $hri Justice N.K. Ac 04.01 .2010 Shri Dheerendra Pandey, appears on behalf of Shri Deepak Jain, Advocate for applicant wyer for the State. Shri Sameer Behar, Panel L Heard on application for rest ration ofW.P No. 1672/2000. Learned couneel appearing for the applicant submits that the counsel for the petitioner co ld not appear on account of bonafide mistake, therefore, W‘ dismissed on 01 .12.2009, may be estored to its original file. On due consideration l a satisfied that the counsel for petitioners is succeeded in explal ing the cause of his absence, therefore, the application is allow ol and WP No. 1672/2000 is restored to its original file. A copy of‘this order be pl oed on record of the original petition and the same be listed for earing in the next week. 8d]— N.K.Agarwal Judge Sahu 3% drier; No. 1672/2000, which was