IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14061 of 2000 Between: 1. M. Veeranjaneyulu 2. I.Krishna 3. T. V.Srinivasarao 4. M.Vijayarama Raju 5. S. Lalithasundari 6. K. Baganabu 7. G. SAtyanarayana ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1. Governmet of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Secretary,Education Department, Secretariat, Hydeabad. 2. The Commissioner of School Education, AP, Hyderabad 3. The District Collector/Chairman, DSC-2000, East Godvaari District at Kakinada. 4. The District Educational Officer/Secretary, DSC-2000. East Godavari at Kakinada. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to accept the applications of the petitioners herein for the DSC,2000 for the post of Secondary Grade Teachers and allow the petitioners herein to participate in the DSC.2000 and conduct the selection process basing on their performance int he DSC.2000 with all consequential benefits and attendant benefits, by holding the action of the respondents herein in allowing only the candidates of third batch of special teachers Training Certificate Course for the DSC.2000 and/or not accepting the applications of the petitioners herein for the DSC.2000 on the ground tha they did not obtain orders from the Hon'ble APAT as illegal and arbitrary,discriminatory, irrational, illogical and violative of Articles 14, 16 and21 of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.SUDHEER Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following : . VE & PSR, JJ W.P.No. 14061 of 2000 O r d e r: (Per P. Swaroop Reddy, J.) This writ petition is filed seeking direction to the respondents to receive the applications of the petitioners for admitting them to the examination conducted by the District Selection Committee-2000. 2. The OA was filed questioning the notification issued by respondent Nos.2 and 3 in the year 2000. No interim order was granted while admitting the writ petition. As of now we are in 2009, and, the cause raised for adjudication in this writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed infructuous. No costs. ________________ V. ESWARAIAH, J. Dated:30.7.2009 *BVS _____________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J.