wp844­11.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.844 OF 2011 Rekha Rangrao Patil .. Petitioner Versus Balasaheb Gaikwad .. Respondent Mrs.Preeti Walimbe for petitioner Mr.Prathamesh Bargude for respondent CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 26th July 2011. P.C.: 1] Heard both sides. 2] This is not a case for interference in writ jurisdiction, inasmuch as the dispute is about revenue entries. Which of the sale deeds should get precedence and whether the same are hit by the provisions of Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 are matters which are already subject to civil litigation. It may be that RCS No.254 of 2002 is dismissed but it is stated that the wp844­11.doc 2 order of dismissal is challenged in higher court. Further, even if petitioners sale deed is to take precedence and whether it binds the respondents are matters which can not be decided by authorities under the Land Revenue Code because, they essentially relate to the title and rights claimed in immovable properties. In these circumstances, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. 3] Needless to state that the competent civil court shall decide the issue on the basis of the oral and documentary evidence placed before it and without being influenced by the orders passed by the Revenue Authorities. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)