TBEE HIGHI COmtT OF CHHATTISGAIUX, AT SSL^PVm COJVTJBMPT CAS^JSO. 3 ^l? /2011 TmTFITXCMEW^R^-1- Mabesh Rapi Gavel aged 43 year^ S/o Ex. yor^at Ouard R/o Village Bundeli P.0 Baldora VIA Adbhar Tehsil Sakti District Janjgir Champa (C.G). VERSXTS RE3SPONDENTS;-- 1. Mr. Rajesh Pandey, ^ContemaoitiS) ^^ 3-"°°:L,^^""r'.......•" e-^ 1^^^":L^-: p^ew^,^."-,-:"" Oe^-^'^l ^ ^^ s\' Divisioi-ial Forest Officer, Marvahi Forest Division, At. Pendra Road, Bilaspur (C.G). 2. Mr. I. N. Singh, Conservator of Forest, Biiaspur Circle , Bilaspur (C.O), PETITION U7S 12 OF THE GONTEMT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF HTDIA FOR NON ACTION & I^LIBBRATE NON COMPLIANCB OF THE QSBBK 2M1^ 4al Mav 2007 PASSED BYWWB^E JUS^C^ S^^rS.K.AGNIHOTRI IN W.P.fS^ N0:796/2005 3^I^T ^FT ^.T?N? ^Trsn^T^w^ Deepti ^TC) •^ii'qi^^, ©•al<-i^i(o^fsr^rray ^^g^...^J:....^...^.^^» ^rr^T ^^K (^i^^qr) i'^TT^R ^ll^ 3?T^T SB: Hon'ble Shn Manindra MohaliInSbnvastava.J, 08-11-2011 Shri S.N.Nande, counsei for by the petitioner was disposed orf| ^HT^Rh'RR^ff ^ fe^ Tfa^Ii •^3?iw3Tr^T |:he petitioner. Heard on admission. Learned counsei for the petjtioner submits that earlier, the writ petition filed with iiberty to make representation before the competent authority whereafter a ilepresentation was moved but the decision has notbeentaken. i Apparentiy, the order passid by the Court on 4/5/07 does not direct the respondents to take decision on th^ representation of the petitioner but the petition was disposed off with liberty to ma given by the State counsei. In that view of the matter, i^i the opinion of this Court, no contempt can be said to have been made out. Th remedy as may be availabie to hirt under the iaw if he is aggrieved by inaction on the part of the concemed respond ;e representation. There is no undertaking ajso petitioner. if so advised, may take recourse to nt. The petition Is finally disposed ofr. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivasteva Judge r, ^^T?5%, ri^f^T^-^^-s/i 40.—2/20! i —1,50,000.