IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21912 of 2009 CHANDRAKET RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 24.08.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner has approached this court seeking bail in a case instituted under Section 364 of the Penal Code. Allegation as per F.I.R. is that the petitioner kidnapped the mother of the informant. Records indicate that both the parties are agnates. It further appears from paragraph no.23 of the case diary that there is a long standing dispute between the parties relating to title/ownership of a piece of land. Informant claims purchase of the land through one lady. The accused persons claims purchase of the same land through the son of that lady. It further appears that this has ignited several criminal litigation between the parties Learned counsel for the petitioner draws attention of this court to paragraph no.135 of the case diary to show that the lady victim returned home on her own after one year of the alleged occurrence. He next submits with reference to paragraph no. 206 of the case diary that the S.D.P.O.doubted the veracity of the allegations contained in the F.I.R. Keeping in focus the aforesaid submissions, this court is persuaded to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M. Hajipur at Vaishali in connection with Goraul P.S.Case no. 52 of 2008. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)