1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4422 OF 2009 Vitthal Nivrutti Satale ..Petitioner Versus Shindu Yashwant Pawar, since deceased through his legal representatives & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.S.G.Deshumkh for the petitioner. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 20th July 2009. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The respondents are the legal representatives of the original plaintiff and the present petitioner is the original defendant. 2. The original plaintiff died on 26th March 2003. On 25th August 2003 an application was made by the respondents for condonation of delay, for setting aside abatement and for bringing their names on record. By order dated 12th August 2008 the said application has been allowed. This is the order impugned in this Writ Petition. The 2 submission is that though the application was contested by the petitioner, the same has been disposed of by an order without assigning any reasons and without hearing the petitioner. 3. The delay in filing application for bringing the heirs on record was of three days. By the impugned order the said delay stands condoned and names of the respondents have been ordered to be brought on record of the suit. No reason to interfere with the impugned order in the writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA,J)