^ S»ngleBench IN THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF C^IATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. ncc Mo 3^9 ^-^-^-.-—^^.. WP(S)NO. 1847 OF 2008 ") PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS Ramesh Lal, s/o Shri Kishan Singh, Aged about 46 years, Ex. CISF Member No. 851300412 3rd reserve Battalion, Resident at : Qtr. No. 1/163, CISF- UTAL, District - Durg, (C.G.). 1. Union of India Through : The Secretary, Ministry of Home, North Block, New Delhi. 2. The inspector General (WS), (Revisionary Authority) Central Industrial Security Force, West Zone Headquarters, RCFL Complex, Chembur, Mumbai - 400074. 3. The Dy. Inspector General, (Appellate Authority) Central Industrial Security Force, West Zone Headquarters, RCFL Complex, Chembur, Mumbai - 400074. 4. The Commandant, (Disciplinary Authority) Central Industrial Security Force, 3rd Reser^e Battalion, Bhilai, District - Durg. APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF ORIGINAL WRIT PETTITION WP(S)NO. 1847 OF 2008.- The petitioner respectfully begs to submit as under: - <<i*<dT w<n^» '3'sr ^i-^id^, y>'a1'M<Ko, Ri|crl!<-j^< ...f0.c&..^.:...^ll'l..},^200 w^tJ^ (liclfd<<^ST) ^l^ff ^RT ^Jch WTW^T^q^ -.^ Deeptl ?^nw ^fer 3n^r SB LHon'bie Shri Manindra Moha^^^ 14-07-2011 Ms. Sonia Kuideep, counsei fo Shri KashifShakeei.appears Heard on i.A.No.1. appiicat restoration appiication. Learned counsei for the resp^ time to the appiication for condonatioh Considering the grounds whf condonation of deiay and considerinfe matter of restoration of the writ prosecution, i am not inciined to granp: TakEng into consideration condonation ofdeiay, the deiay is co| Aiso heard on application for After going through the cause| the counsei couid not appear at the| am satisfied that just and proper cau{ Accordingiy, the appiication fc|r The order of dismissai date<B petition is restored to its original nurrlber idWtfl^ ^-fi^ ^UII^, il^K'IIC*—FS/140—2/2011—1,50,000. <=M^<fll 'RPT^ff ^f 'fe^ <P'1^1< ^^iRw^n^T Shrivasfava, J. the petitioner. ^n behaif of respondents. |on for condonation of deiay in fiiing the >ndents states that he may be granted some of deiay and restoration appiicatlon. fch have been urged in the appiication for that the present appiication is reiating to the Ipetition which was dismissed for want of any time to the respondents. grounds urged in the appiication for idoned. lestoration ofthe writ petition. [shown in the application, on account ofwhich, |time, when the case was caiied for hearing, i »ehas been shown for non-appearance. restoration is aiiowed. 13/05/2011 is hereby recaiied and the writ ttie Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge