CRM-M No.35508 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.35508 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 11.11.2011 Pavittar Singh ...... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. P.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Gill, D.A.G., Punjab. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for the complainant. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.209 dated 02.11.2010 registered under Sections 406, 420, 468 and 471 IPC at Police Station Phillaur, District Jalandhar. On 27.04.2011 the following order was passed:- “This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No.209 dated 2.11.2010 under Sections 406, 420, 468 and 471 IPC registered at CRM-M No.35508 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Police Station Phillaur, District Jalandhar. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that without admitting his guilt but to show his bona fides the petitioner is ready to create a fixed deposit of ` 4.40 lacs in the name of the Illaqa Magistrate with the condition that in case the petitioner is acquitted the amount of that deposit (alongwith interest accrued thereon) shall be released to the petitioner and in case the petitioner is convicted that amount shall be released to the complainant without prejudice to his right to make any further claims. This proposition is acceptable to learned counsel for the complainant as well as to learned Addl. A.G. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that one month's time be granted to the petitioner to do the needful. I find this to be a fair request. Adjourned to 01.06.2011. Interim order to continue.” Today learned counsel for the petitioner states that in terms of the said order a fixed deposit of ` 4.40 lacs has been created. On instructions from H.C. Daljit Singh learned Deputy Advocate General as well as learned counsel for the complainant have accepted this factual assertion. Consequently, this petition is allowed. The interim order dated 03.12.2010 is confirmed subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 11, 2011 JUDGE ashish