IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.18144 of 2010 Date of decision: 6.10.2010 Ramesh Lal ...Petitioner Versus Managing Director, PUNGRAIN and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Dheeraj Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. **** ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J ( Oral) This petition seeks quashing of appointment of respondent no.5 for handling of stock. Prayer has also been made for issuance of a direction to respondent No.1 to accept the tender of petitioner. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready to do the work on much lower rate than respondent no.5. We are unable to accept the submission. It is not disputed that the work was allotted to respondent no.5 after following the procedure. In absence of any illegality in allotment of work, mere willing of the petitioner to do the work at a lower rate is no ground to quash the appointment of respondent no.5 or to issue a direction to allot the work to the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. (Adarsh Kumar Goel) Judge October 06,2010 (Ajay Kumar Mittal) Pka Judge