IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.1004 of 2011 Date of decision: 07.03.2011 Veer Arjun ...Petitioner Versus Canara Bank and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. A.P. Jagga, Advocate for the respondents. RANJIT SINGH J. There is a written request made for adjournment in this case by the counsel for the respondents. That would explain the non- presence of the counsel for the petitioner. However, the counsel for the respondents is present and points out that the writ petition bearing No. 10835 of 2010 filed by the Borrower has been rendered infructuous as he has accepted the terms offered by the bank and has agreed to discharge the entire liability. This writ petition was filed by the guarantor, whose property valued at Rs. 2.75 crores, was being put to auction. Since the borrower himself has come forward to discharge liability, as per the agreed terms, there would not be any cause with the Bank to proceed against the guarantor for the time being. Accordingly, the prayer made in the writ petition is rendered infructuous. It is made clear that the Bank would proceed against the petitioner-guarantor only in case there is a failure on the part of the borrower to discharge liability. In view of what is noticed Civil Writ Petition No.1004 of 2011 -2- above, the present writ petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. However, if the petitioner still is left with any grievance, he will be at liberty to revive this writ petition. March 07, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE