Review Petition No. 32 of 2011. 21.4.2011. Present: Mr. K.D.Shreedhar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Ruma Kaushaik, Addl. A.G. with Mr. J.S. Rana, Asstt. A.G for respondents. This is a petition for reviewing judgment dated 21.12.2010 in CWP (T) No. 9628 of 2008. In the review petition, it has been stated that judgment dated 17.06.2008 in CWP No. 319 of 1997 Hira Lal versus State of H.P. and Manmohan Prasad versus State of H.P. 2009(2) SLC 176 were cited before the Court at the time of hearing of the petition. It has also been stated that Annexure R-1 dated 16.09.2003 was not in existence at the time of filing of the petition, therefore, there was no question of challenging Annexure R-1 dated 16.09.2003 in the petition. On these grounds, the review petition has been filed. In so far two judgments Hira Lal Versus State of H.P and Manmohan Prasad versus State of H.P. are concerned, there is no reference of these judgments in the judgment dated 21.12.2010 which was orally dictated in the Court. Mr. Puneet Rajta, Advocate, appeared as vice counsel for petitioner on 21.12.2010. In these circumstances, it is not possible to accept the contention that these judgments were cited at the time of hearing of the petition. The order dated 16.09.2003 Annexure R-1 was very much on record and was placed by the respondents along with their reply. This was not challenged. This Court in the judgment dated 21.12.2010 has taken the view that the petitioner has not prayed for quashing of order dated 16.09.2003 Annexure R-1. Even if, Annexure R-1 dated 16.09.2003 was not in existence at the time of filing of the petition, the relief prayed by the petitioner could not have been given in view of Annexure R-1 dated 16.09.2003 which was not assailed in the petition. There is no error apparent on the face of the record. Hence, petition is dismissed. (Kuldip Singh), Judge. April 21, 2011. (krt)