IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2049 of 2008 SHOBHA DEVI @ SHOBHA PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2/ 04/02/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Applications were submitted in December, 2006 for appointment on the post of Angan Bari Sevika, Vishnupura, Block- Mohania, district-Kaimur at Bhabua. Aggrieved by the selection of respondent No.6 claiming higher marks the petitioner claims to have petitioned the Block Development Officer in time on 8.5.2007. It is submitted that the matter was enquired into when an enquiry report was given by Additional Collector on 11.7.2007 vide annexure-4 that the appointment of respondent No.6 was not in consonance with law. If a grievance had been raised with regard to an alleged wrong appointment on the post of Angan Bari Sevika, notwithstanding the fact that the petitioner had submitted a representation to the Block Development Officer and not to the District Magistrate, the authority then competent, that issue loses its relevance in light of the enquiry report dated 2 11.7.2007 sought to be relied upon. The matter is remanded to the District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua to take a final decision in the matter inter alia after examination of the enquiry report dated 11.7.2007 and hearing all concerned, including respondent No.6, within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The application stands disposed. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)