-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 292 OF OF 2010 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1637 OF 2010 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 812 OF 2010 M/s. Destimoney India Services Pvt. Ltd. ... Appellant versus M/s. Savita Oil Technologies Ltd. ... Respondent Mr. M.R. Baya for the appellant. Mr. D.V. Deokar with Mr. Pinakin Modi, instructed by M/s. Parimal Shroff & Company, for the respondent. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: OCTOBER 05, 2010. P.C. It is not in dispute that the Arbitration Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is still pending before the learned single Judge. We request the learned single Judge to dispose of the petition latest by 29th October, 2010. Learned counsel for the appellant vehemently submitted that the learned single Judge should not have granted the injunction order as it is beyond the agreement in question. Since the matter is at the ad- interim stage, we are not expressing any opinion at this stage. All these points -2- can be canvassed before the learned single Judge at the time of hearing of the petition. All the contentions of both sides are accordingly kept open. Even if there is any settlement, the same can also be placed on record before the learned single Judge taking such matter. In case the petition is still not disposed of one way or the other, liberty is granted to the appellant to apply in the present proceedings. 2. Subject to what is stated above, the Appeal and the Notice of Motion are accordingly disposed of. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.