THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.26253 of 2011 Dated 20th December, 2011 Between: Kshatriya Samkshema Samithi …Petitioner And APEPDCL rep.by its Chairman & Managing Director, Viskhapatnam and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri P.Satyanarayana Counsel for respondents: Smt.Jyothi Eswar Gogineni The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside provisional and final assessment orders, dated 31.01.2011 and 30.04.2011, of respondent Nos.2 and 3 respectively. A perusal of the averments contained in the affidavit shows that the petitioner has already filed an appeal before respondent No.4 on 30.08.2011 against the final assessment order. However, the petitioner felt aggrieved by disconnection of power supply on 16.09.2011, challenging which, it has filed the present writ petition. Sri P.Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that his client has paid 50% of the final assessment amount and that under the extant terms and conditions, the petitioner is entitled for continuance of power supply till the disposal of the appeal by respondent No.4. Smt.Jyothi Eswar Gogineni, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, admitted to the above position. In view of the fact that the appeal is pending before respondent No.4 and the petitioner is entitled for availing supply without making further payment, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.4 to dispose of the appeal within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till the disposal of the appeal, power supply to the petitioner’s service connection shall not be disconnected for non- payment of balance 50% of the final assessment amount. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.32412 of 2011 and W.V.M.P.No.4073 of 2011 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 20th December, 2011 VGB