CWP No.395 of 2001 30.11.2006 Present: Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surinder Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajan Dewan, Addl. A.G. for respondent No. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petition has become infructuous as the tenure of the Commission constituted vide Annexure PT has ended and the present petition no longer survives. It is also stated by the learned counsel that the duration/tenure of the Commission was not enlarged, which fact is not disputed by the respondents. In view of this statement of the learned counsel, this writ petition is dismissed as being infructuous. All pending applications are also dismissed as being infructuous. All interim orders shall stand vacated forthwith. November 30, 2006 (Dev Darshan Sud) (ss) Judge