1 17.apln154-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.154 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3945 OF 2009 Mumtaz Mohammed Shoaib Shaikh. .. Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. .... Mr.A.M. Saraogi, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs.A.S. Pai, A.P.P. for the State. .... CORAM : A.R.JOSHI, J. DATED : 19TH JULY, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard rival submissions for sometime on this application for alteration of condition of bail. 2. The condition imposed on the applicant woman accused was to attend once a week for three months and 2 17.apln154-10 thereafter twice a month. On instructions from the EOW, learned A.P.P. submits that further investigation under Section 173 (8) of Cr.P.C. is continuing and it is a matter of involvement of huge amount of Rs.1.13 crores and odd. 3. During the arguments, it is submitted on behalf of the applicant-woman that it is very inconvenient for her to attend the EOW office at Mumbai from her Mira Road residence, twice a month. Still considering the magnitude of the offence and considering further continuation of the investigation, at last for two more months, such condition cannot be relaxed. However, thereafter she can be directed to attend as and when required by the investigating officer. Hence the order :- :: O R D E R :: [i] The applicant to attend the concerned EOW office twice a month as per the earlier directions between the period from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. and after two months from the date of this order, she is to attend the 3 17.apln154-10 said concerned EOW office as and when called by the concerned investigating officer till the investigation is over. [ii] With these directions, present application is disposed of. (A.R.JOSHI,J.) ppd