1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6600 OF 2010 Laxmibai Laxman Dhakare ..PETITIONER -VERSUS- The State of Maharashtra and others. ..RESPONDENTS ......... Mr.S.R. Bagal, advocate for petitioner. Mr.S.V. Kurundkar, A.G.P. for respondent no.1. Mr.R.P. Phatake, advocate for respondent no.2. Mr.D.S. Mali, advocate for respondent no.5. ........ (CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) DATE : 29th July, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard. The election process can not be stalled when it is at the fag end in view of the observations made in the case of “Vinod Pandurang Bharsakade V/s Returning Officer, Akot and another”{2003(4) Mh.L.J. 359}. The Petition is filed against acceptance of nomination paper and nothing serious is likely to be prejudiced the petitioner, if the respondent no.5 is allowed to contest the election. Keeping all the questions open, Petition is disposed of accordingly. (V.R.KINGAONKAR) JUDGE gas/wp6600.10