m<i§ %w§§‘§ g §w2kr§§ (’3926g//_ @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF 'CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) Noumgi. /2009 PETITIONERS 1. Surendra Patel S/o Shri JaiMangal Patel aged about 46 years occupation Agriculturist Resident ‘of Village 85 Post Dhanagar Tahsil 8z, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) I : ‘ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT ‘IN NATURE OF CEERTIORARI MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERES: Narendra Kumar Patel S/o Shri JaiMangal Patel aged about 41 years occupation Agriculturist Resident of Village 8a Post Dhanagar Tahsil 8r, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. (, State of C.G. Through the Secretary, Energy Department Mantralaya, D.K.S.Building, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Jmdal Steel and Power limited «I / through Executive Director Ralgarh Dist Ralgarh (C G) 3. The Collector Ralgarh Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) \l9 VQ' r eeli 4. The Station House Officer Police Station Kotra Road Raigarh Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) mf ga’a <§:\_ $3 : Hon’bie $hri Manindra Mohan 19$! :29?! $hri RSPatel. counsel for the petitioners. S‘hri Satish Gupta! Governm No.1, 3 and 4. Shri Saurabh Sharma, counse Referring to the averments ma counsel for the respondent No.2 . petitioner have already been purcha (copies of which have been placed $hrivast‘ava, J. " for respondent No.2. de in the return fiied on 15/5/09. iearned ubmitted that the iand owned by the sed by respondent No.2 vide saie deed record as Annexure Rm. He submits that in this view of the matter, the pet ion itseif does not survive. Though, iearned counsei for the petitioners prays for time to seek instructions, in my opinion, no pur ose wouid be served in keeping the petitions pending. in View of the ave ents made on affidavits aiong with the return which cleariy shows that resp ndent No.2 has aiready urchased the iand owned by the petitioners. Accordingiy, the petition is fmaiiy disposed off as having been ing iiberty to the petitioners to revive the n rendered infructuous. however reserv petition. if the grievance stiii survives. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava‘i Judge mt Advocate for the Stateirespondents p