IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.80 of 2008 1. The State Of Bihar through Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Vidyalaya Seva Board through its Chairman, Biscomaun Bhawan, Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Education Officer, Saran at Chapra 5. The District Education Officer, Gopalganj 6. The District Education Officer, Siwan 7. The District Education Officer, Bhojpur at Arrah 8. The District Education Officer, Jehanabad 9. The District Education Officer, Khagaria Respondents ----- Petitioners Versus 1. Braj Kishore Singh son of Late Lal Babu Singh, resident of Village Barheya, P.S. Barauli, District Gopalganj. 2. Naimuddin Ansari, son of Late Kurban Ali, resident of Village Anaithi, P.S. Anaithi, District Gopalganj, 3. Brij Nandan Rai, son of Late Akshay Lal Rai, resident of Village Parsauna, P.S. Parsa, District Saran. 4. Smt. Amrawati Singh, wife of Dr. Surendra Pratap Singh, resident of Village Masarakh, P.S. Masarakh, District Saran 5. Smt. Shashibala Kumari, w/o Sri Arun Kumar, resident of Shahpur Patti, P.S. Shahpur Patti, District Bhojpur. 6. Ramayan Yadav, son of Bharat Yadav, resident of Village Kohangar, P.O.Chitanpur, P.S. Ashwan, District Siwan. 7. Brajesh Mishra, son of Rashil Lal Mishra, resident of Village Dumaria Bhjurg, P.S. Parbatta, District Khagaria 8. Nagendra Kumar, son of Late Kirti Narain Singh, resident of Laraw, P.S. Makhdumpur, District Jehanabad. 9. Smt. Kumari Shila, D/o Late Ramanand Sharma, resident of Village Jai Krishna Bigha, P.S. Jailtipur Kuruma, Distt. Jehanabad. 10. Smt. Indrawati Mishra, D/O Sri Durga Tiwary, resident of Village Khajuraha, P.S. Bhore, District Gopalganj. 11. Madhusudan Prasad, S/o Janak Rai, resident of Village Bhagwanpur, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Siwan. --- Petitioners-Respondents ----------- 5 3.12.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. This application has been filed for review of the order 2 dated 25.5.2007 passed in CWJC No.6323 of 1999, whereby the Director, Secondary Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna (respondent no.2-petitioner no.2 herein) was directed to consider the cases of the writ petitioners for their appointment/regularisation to the post of Headmaster/Headmistress in the concerned Project Schools, in accordance with law. Such consideration should be made within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of the certified copy of the order. A liberty was also given to the intervenors to make their representation before (respondent no.2-petitioner no.2 herein) for consideration of their cases in the light of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of A.K. Pradhan v. State of Bihar, reported in 1998(2) PLJR 2(SC), vide Annexure 8 to the writ application. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner-State submits that respondent no.2-petitioner no.2 herein, could not consider the cases of the writ petitioners-respondents herein, on account of certain confusion as to the applicability of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of A.K. Pradhan (supra) since there are different Project Schools with different considerations. Alternatively, it is submitted that the time of four months allowed for consideration of this cases as per the order dated 25.5.2007 be extended. However, uptill now no such application for extension has been filed. The above review application was filed on 24th of March, 2008. 3 Considering the submissions made on behalf of the State-petitioners, I do not find any merit warranting review of the order in question. The review application is, accordingly, dismissed. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)