((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.662 OF 2009 Ashok Vasudeo Chaturvedi Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra Respondent Amol Patankar i/by Prashant Parsurampuria for petitioner. H.J.Dedhi, APP for State. Respondent no.2 in person present. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 07th May 2009 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The petitioner is the original accused. The petitioner made an application under section 145(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and prayed that the complainant who had filed an affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief should be called upon to lead the oral evidence. The said application has been rejected. Insofar as this Court is concerned, the issue has been settled by a decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of KSL Industries Ltd. vs. Manulal Khandelwal and another (2005-ALL ((-2-)) M.R.[Cri]-1105) as well as a decision in the case of Indo International Limited and another vs. State of Maharashtra in Criminal Writ Petition No.1274 of 2005. 2. In view of settled position of law insofar as this Court is concerned, no fault can be found with the impugned order. The writ petition is accordingly rejected. (A.S.OKA, J.)