-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 7901 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 28 OF 2005 Sikandar Abdul Mazid Khan ... Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. M.R. Deshpande for the Applicant. Mrs. M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATE: DECEMBER 13, 2005. P.C. Although this application has been filed praying for bail, however, it is seen from the record that bail has already been granted to the Applicant by this Court's order dated 14th January, 2005. The Applicant has availed of that order. However, the Applicant has not furnished fresh bond as was required under the said order. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, I am inclined to grant further indulgence to the Applicant to furnish fresh bail bond within two weeks from today failing which the bail order passed on 14th January, 2005 shall automatically stand cancelled. In fact, similar conditional order was -2- passed on 2nd August, 2005. As a consequence of which notice has been issued to the Applicant as to why his bail should not be granted. 3. Be that as it may, this Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ( c) with direction to the applicant to furnish fresh bail bond within two weeks from today failing which the bail order passed earlier will stand vacated automatically and the concerned Police may proceed to take the Applicant in custody forthwith. Application is disposed of accordingly. (A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)