Patna High Court CWJC No.9441 of 2010 (3) dt.20-10-2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9441 of 2010 ====================================================== 1. Vijay Narain Singh S/O Rameshwar Singh R/O Vill.- Srinagar Matihan, P.S.- Dariyapur, Distt.- Saran 2. Shivji Bharti S/O Late Suraj Bharti R/O Vill.- Dhorlahi Bhaithal, P.S.- Amnour, Distt.- Saran .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary, Department Of Human Resources Development, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 2. The Director, Department Of Higher Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 3. The District Magistrate, Saran At Chapra 4. The District Education Officer, Saran At Chapra 5. The Bihar School Examination Board (Higher Secondary), Budh Marge, Patna Through Its Secretary 6. The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board (Higher Secondary), Budh Marg, Patna 7. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board (Higher Secondary), Budh Marg, Patna 8. Dasrath Prasad Rai S/O Ram Pravesh Rai R/O Vill.- Pohiya, P.S.- Garkha, Distt.- Saran .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nakul Kr.Jamuar Mr. Vijay Kumar 'Mukul' For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp13) Mr. P.K.Shahi ====================================================== 3 20-10-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The relief claimed in the application is for a direction to the Bihar School Examination Board to grant approval to the Managing Committee of the Sanjay Gandhi Inter College, Chapra at Saran constituted under the chairmanship of petitioner no.1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits from the Patna High Court CWJC No.9441 of 2010 (3) dt.20-10-2011 pleadings that certain vested interests are unnecessarily creating problems in the functioning of the Managing Committee adversely affecting the atmosphere and that the person claiming to be a principal was not fit to hold the post. But it is fairly acknowledged that under the Bihar School Examination Board Act, the Board only grants recognition to the institution and no approval for the constitution of the Managing Committee is required from it. If that be so, then the pleadings contained in pargraph-10 and 15 of the writ application appear to be raising a purely private inter se dispute between individuals with regard to the constitution of a Managing Committee which is purely amenable to the jurisdiction of the civil court or any other appropriate forum that may be available in law. Needless to state that the duties of the Board shall then arise in context of any such orders that may be passed by the authority concerned. The writ application is disposed. Krishna Chandra Jha/- (Navin Sinha, J)