1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:04.08.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL.O.P.(MD).No.9228 of 2011 Ponraj : Petitioner/Accused Vs. 1.The State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Vasudevanallur Police Station, Sivagiri Taluk, Tirunelveli District. : Respondent/Complainant 2.Madasamy : Respondent/De-facto complainant PRAYER: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to call for the records in Cr.No.171 of 2011 on the file of the 1st respondent Police Station and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ananthapadmanaban For Respondent No.1 : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ORDER Heard the petitioner and second respondent, who are present before this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) are also present. 2.On the basis of the complaint given by the defacto complainant, a case has been registered in Cr.No.171 of 2011 and the same is pending on the file of the first respondent police. 3.During pendency of the case, both the parties has settled their dispute at the intervention of the elders and to that effect, they jointly filed a compromise memo. Since the de facto complainant do https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 not want to pursue further in Cr.No.171 of 2011 and also recording the joint compromise memo filed by the petitioner and second respondent, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case for quash. Hence, the proceedings in Cr.No.171 of 2011 is hereby quashed. 4.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected M.P.No.1 of 2011 is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Inspector of Police, Vasudevanallur Police Station, Sivagiri Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Order made in CRL.O.P.(MD).No.9228 of 2011 Dated:-04.08.2011 vs NSV/19.8.11/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/