@E HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT 'BILASPUR 'yyrit Petition No. 1924 01'2003 PETITIONER : Swamlata Shukla Danghwr of Shri .Ramnihal Shukla, aged about 38 years, Resident of H.No. 47/64 Suhaga Mandir Road, Brahmanpara, Raipur. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary \ Ministry of Labour ,Mantralaya, DKS BhaWan, Raipur. 2. The Labour Commissionar, State of Chhattisgarh, 3. A.D. Patel, Assistant Grade III, C/o office of 4, Mohd. Aslam Parvez, Assistant Grade III C/o 5. Nalini Nanda Thakur, Assistant Grade III, C/o Raipur. ‘ Labour Commissioner, Raipur. ‘ Office of Labour Commissioner, Raipur. Ofbce of the Labour Commissioner, Raipur. 6, Dinbandhu Tandi, Assistant Grade HI, C/o OEiee of the Labour Commissioner, Raipur. ‘ (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF 'ITE CONSTYI'U'I'ION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agmotri, J.) Present : Ms. Shri Sunita Ajit Singh, Jain, Advocate Panel Lawyer for the for petitioner. the State/respondent No. 1&2. Shri N.K. Vyas, Advocate for the respondent No. 3 to 5. 1 ORAL ORDER ' (Passed on 5m day of August, 2008) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in the light of the order dated 04.06.2008 (Annexure R 3/6), filed on 05.08.2008 by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3 to 5, nothing petition, as this petition has become infi'uctuous. No objection from other side. 2. It is ordered accordingly. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. . a survives in this b3 / 1 . Sd/' ._ ~ ‘2 Satish K.Agnihotri , A _, Judge‘ ’ ” ‘ ‘1 \i