IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated 17.2.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.40633 of 2006 (OA 6311 of 1999) G.Pandijothi ... Applicant -Vs.- 1.The District Backward Classes Welfare Officer, Collector Office Compound, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Director of Backward Classes, Chepauk, Chennai-5. ... Respondents Original Application No.6311 of 1999 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench praying to direct the respondents to regularise the services of the applicant in the post of Cook retrospectively with effect from 22.12.87 in the regular time scale of pay with arrears and other consequential service benefits. Since the Tamilnadu Appellate Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. For petitioner : Mr.S.M.Subramaniam For respondents : Mr.S.Sivashanmugam, Government Advocate O R D E R Original Application No.6311 of 1999 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench praying to direct the respondents to regularise the services of the applicant in the post of Cook retrospectively with effect from 22.12.87 in the regular time scale of pay with arrears and other consequential service benefits. Since the Tamilnadu Appellate Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. Petitoiner, a cook working in the Government Girls Hostel has filed the Original Application seeking regularisation of service with effect from 22.12.1987. It is stated by the petitioner that she was sponsored through Employment Exchange on a regular scale of pay. She was ousted from service from time to time and reappointed. In view of the respondents' attitude ousting the petitioner time and again, the Original Application has been filed in the year 1999 to regularise the service and other benefits. Petitioner also made a representation on 12.5.1998 to the second respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation has not been disposed off on merits. 3. Now the petitioner claims benefit under G.O.Ms.No.22 dated 28.2.2006 (which is not produced before this court) and is subsequent order and in view of the changed circumstances, the petitioner is entitled to make further representation in continuation of earlier representation dated 12.5.1998 within a month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the second respondent is to consider and dispose off the same within two months thereafter on its own merits and in the light of the above said G.O., keeping in mind the service rendered pursuant to the order of the Tribunal. The Writ Petition is disposed off accordingly. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar ts To 1.The District Backward Classes Welfare Officer, Collector Office Compound, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Director of Backward Classes, Chepauk, Chennai-5. TRM(CO) km/11.3. W.P.No.40633 of 2006 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/