IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34213 of 2010 1. DINESH MAHTO S/O LATE DEO CHARAN MAHTO 2. SURESH MAHTO S/O LATE DEO CHARAN MAHTO 3. KEDAR MAHTO S/O BHAGWAT MAHTO 4. SANJAY MAHTO S/O BHAGWAT MAHTO 5. MUNNA MAHTO S/O BHAGWAT MAHTO 6. RABI MAHTO S/O DINESH MAHTO 7. CHANDU MAHTO S/O SURESH MAHTO ALL R/O VILLAGE- DADHAPI, P.S.- MADANPUR, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD (BIHAR) ………………… Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………. Opposite Party ----------- 2. 07.03.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 16.8.2010 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-IV, Aurangabad (Bihar) in Sessions Trial No. 111/2010 by which the court has disallowed the application for discharge. It has been submitted that in the facts of the case no ingredient was present to satisfy the provision of Section 307 I.P.C. since simple injuries was found on the head of the injured and there was counter version. Since these are matters which can only be adjudicated at the stage of trial, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter, the application is dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )