1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6579 OF 2007 Jayramdas Pokhardas Dodeja and another .. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri M. M. Patil (Beedkar), Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri D. R. Kale, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1. Shri S. P. Shah, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. Shri D. V. Soman, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 06TH MAY, 2010. ORAL ORDER [Per NARESH H. PATIL, J. ] : 01. Learned counsel for the corporation Shri Shah makes statement that in case the corporation finds that the petitioner has evaded the octroi and did not produce proper record for charging octroi, then appropriate steps would be taken in accordance with law by the corporation. 2 02. In the light of the statement made, we observe that the notice issued by respondent No. 3/Sahakar Agencies Private Limited, which was appointed as octroi collecting agency by the corporation will not be operative. We have not expressed any opinion on merits. This order restricts to the operation of the present notice itself. The writ petition disposed of. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] bsb/May 10