1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2514 OF 2008 M/s.Indo International Limited Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra and another Respondents U.P.Warunjikar for the petitioner. S.M.Singhvi, respondent no.2-complainant present in person. H.J.Dedhia, APP for the State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 29th June 2009 PC :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and second respondent appearing in person. The learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record a xerox copy of Memorandum of Understanding signed by the parties on 18th May 2009. The second respondent (complainant) appearing in person confirms that the said Memorandum of Understanding has been executed by the parties and that he has agreed to compound the offence as he has received the payment of Rs.11.00 lakhs in terms of the settlement. 2. In view of the statement made by the second respondent appearing in person, I pass following order :- 2 (a) The Memorandum of Understanding is marked "X" for identification and is taken on record; (b) In view of the Memorandum of Understanding and the statement made by the second respondent appearing in person, the offence alleged in the complaint bearing No.4927/SS/2007 stands compounded and the complaint accordingly stands disposed of; (c) The writ petition is disposed of in above terms. (A.S.OKA, J.)