1 mss SJ288 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1551 OF 2007 ETC NETWORKS LTD. (now merged with Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. .. PLAINTIFF Vs. SAREGAMA INDIA LTD. .. DEFENDANT Mr. Anushak Daver i/b Kadam & Co. for the plaintiff Mr. Chetan Kapadia i/b Khaitan & Co. for the defendant CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 5/12/2011 P.C. By consent Chamber Summons No. 1673 of 2010 and 1674 of 2010 are made absolute in terms prayer clause (a). The amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt a copy of this order. 2. Mr. Daver, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff seeks leave to withdraw Review Petition No. 35 of 2010 seeking review of the order dated 6th July, 2010. Leave granted. Review Petition is dismissed as 2 mss SJ288 withdrawn. 3. Now in the light of the agreement of parties recorded on 14th of November, 2011 the consent terms are tendered. They are signed by the authorized signatories of the plaintiff and the defendant. Both companies have passed Resolutions confirming the arrangement and agreement and authorizing the signatories to these terms to put their signatures below the terms. 4. It is stated that the defendant offered Rs.3,92,00,000/- which are to be accepted by the plaintiff in full and final settlement of their claims in the summary suit. 24 Post dated cheques have been handed over by the defendant from the date of 7th February, 2012 to 7th January, 2014. It is stated that each one of them shall be duly honoured on their presentation. The undertaking in that behalf is set out in clause 7. 5. After having satisfied myself that there are similar claims which were pending between plaintiff and defendant and they are settled in the same manner and the terms in that behalf have been taken on record and accepted by this court, that the instant consent terms are also taken on record and marked “X” for identification. 6. There will be an order in terms of the consent terms. Suit is decreed accordingly and particularly subject to the arrangement that the cheques 3 mss SJ288 being dishonoured on presentation the suit shall stand decreed as prayed and thereafter the plaintiff can execute the decree in accordance with law. 7. Undertakings in clause No. 7 are accepted. 8. The suit is decreed accordingly. 9. Refund of court fees as per rules. 10. It is stated that the plaintiff will withdraw the company petition and a company appeal stated to be pending in the Calcutta High Court, since the dispute has been amicably settled. (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)