IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 26093 of 2005 Between: Gundepuri Venkaiah, S/o. Latchaiah, R/o. Penpahad Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State Election Commission of A.P. Represented by its Commissioner. 2 District Election Authority (District Collector) Nalgonda. 3 Deputy District Election Authority (RDO), Suryapet. 4 Assistant District Election Authority (MPDO), Penpahad, Nalgonda District. 5 Additional District Election Committee (MRO), Penpahad, Nalgonda District. 6 Basanagarra Venkanna, S/o. Yellaiah, R/o. Penpahad Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District. 7 Election Officer, Stage-II, Gram Panchayat Eelctions - 2001 Penpahad, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.J.R.MANOHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to order of the Election Tribunal- cum-Junior Civil Judge, Suryapet dated 18th July, 2005 in O.P.No.8 of 2001 and quash the same by holding it as illegal, bad and arbitrary and further direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Sarpanch of Penpahad village till the period is completed.” At the hearing, Sri Bandari Shankar, learned counsel representing Sri J.R.Manohar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP No.33524 of 2005 is also dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Dated 19th June, 2008 vrn