IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 27TH OCTOBER 2009 / 5TH KARTHIKA 1931 LA.App..No. 1435 of 2007(C) -------------------------------- LAR.129/2002 of ADDL.SUB COURT, THALASSERY .................... APPELLANT(S): 1ST RESPONDENT IN LAR ----------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), RAILWAY, KANNUR. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS & 2ND RESPONDENT IN LAR ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THAYYIL PUTHIYAPURAYIL RAMACHANDRAN, S/O. ONAKKAN, PADMA SADAN, CHALA PANDRANDUKANDY, P.O.THOTTADA, EDAKKAD AMSOM. 2. THAYYIL PUTHIYAPURAYIL JAYARAJAN, S/O. ONAKKAN, PADMA SADAN, CHALA PANDRANDUKANDY, P.O.THOTTADA, EDAKKAD AMSOM. 3. THAYYIL PUTHIYAPURAYIL LOHITHAKSHAN, S/O. ONAKKAN, PADMA SADAN, CHALA PANDRANDUKANDY, P.O.THOTTADA, EDAKKAD AMSOM. 4. THAYYIL PUTHIYAPURAYIL DIVAKARAN, S/O. ONAKKAN, PADMA SADAN, CHALA PANDRANDUKANDY, P.O.THOTTADA, EDAKKAD AMSOM. 5. THAYYIL PUTHIYAPURAYIL SUDHAKARAN, S/O. ONAKKAN, PADMA SADAN, CHALA PANDRANDUKANDY, P.O.THOTTADA, EDAKKAD AMSOM. L.A.A.1435/07 -2- 6. THAYYIL PUTHIYAPURAYIL VINOD KUMAR, S/O. ONAKKAN, PADMA SADAN, CHALA PANDRANDUKANDY, P.O.THOTTADA, EDAKKAD AMSOM. ADV. SRI.JOBY JACOB PULICKEKUDY FOR R.1TO6 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/10/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ L. A. A. No.1435 of 2007 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 27th day of October, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J By our order dt.22/10/09, we found that the court below was justified in relying on Ext.A5. The Registry now reports to us that Ext.A5 has become final in the sense that nobody has preferred appeal against Ext.A5. So the appeal is only to be dismissed. 2. The learned Government Pleader submitted that the Reference Court has committed a mistake of not deducting the compensation which was awarded to the claimant by adopting the method of capitalisation of income even though fresh method of land value has been adopted under the impugned judgment. We L. A. A. No.1435 of 2007 -2- notice some merit in the above submission. We permit the appellant to move the learned Subordinate Judge himself for appropriate corrections of the impugned judgment. If any correction application is filed by the appellant before the court below within one month from today that application will be disposed of by the court below with notice to the claimants through their counsel in accordance with law. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE K. SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE kns/-