IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6243 of 2011 Decided on: 26th September, 2011. Kusam Lata. … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Inder Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(i) That respondents may be directed to declare the result of the petitioner in the select list of successful candidates belonging to General category from the waiting list prepared in pursuance of advertisements as annexure P-1, and offer her appointment to the post of Language Teacher (Hindi) under General (UR) category, as two candidates at serial No.1 and serial No.5 in selection list, belonging to the General (UR) category has not been offered appointment on account of fake and forged documents and waiting list is still operative.” 2. On 4th August, 2011, this Court passed the following order: 2 “Learned standing counsel for the Subordinate Selection Board to get instruction as to what is the date of expiry of the waiting panel.” 3. Thereafter, on 19th August, 2011, this Court passed the following order: “There will be a direction to the second respondent to report the vacancies, existing as on today in the post of Language Teacher (Hindi) to the third respondent within two weeks from the date of production of the copy of this order by the petitioner before the second respondent.” 4. The learned counsel appearing for the third respondent submits that the Selection Board has already furnished two names from the waiting list to the second respondent and the petitioner is one of the two names. There will be a direction to the second respondent to take further action in terms of the recommendation made by the third respondent, within 10 days from the date of production of a copy of this judgment by the petitioner before the second respondent. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Authenticated copy to the parties. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 26th September, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr) Judge. 3