IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2009 / 1ST ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 26675 of 2009(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- LINCY GLANCY, D/O.P.B.GLANCY,PALLATH HOUSE, PULLALLKKARA, NAD PO, ALUVA-683 563. BY ADV. SRI.H.BADARUDDIN SMT.AYSHA RAHMAN SMT.B.SHAMEERA SMT.M.ARCHANA SMT.M.SHAZIA SULTHANA SRI.SUDHEESH T.T. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N. RAVINDRAN, J. ```````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 26675 of 2009 ````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2009 J U D G M E N T Heard Sri.H.Badruddin, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, the learned standing counsel appearing for the University of Calicut. 2. The petitioner is a final year Law student. She appeared for the ninth semester L.L.B. degree examination conducted by the University of Calicut in May 2009. The results were published towards the end of August 2009. The petitioner failed in one paper namely, “International Law”. In the meanwhile, she appeared for the tenth semester examination and passed the same. She has, therefore, applied for revaluation of her answer script in the paper “International Law”. The petitioner submits that she is sure to secure a pass on revaluation and that unless her answer script is revalued expeditiously, she will be put to serious prejudice. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to revalue her answer script described in Ext.P3 application expeditiously. WPC.26675/09 : 2 : 3. Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, the learned standing counsel appearing for the Calicut University, submits that the last date for submitting the applications for revaluation is not yet over and that within eight weeks from the last date, the University will revalue the petitioner's answer script described in Ext.P3 application, if the application is in order and the requisite fee has been paid. In the light of the submission made by the learned standing counsel, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to revalue the petitioner's answer script described in Ext.P3 application, if it is in order, and to communicate the results to him, within eight weeks from the date on which the petitioner produces a certified copy of this judgment before the Controller of Examinations, University of Calicut. Sd/- (P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. to Judge