-: 1 :- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 4677 OF 1993. Bank of India. ..Plaintiff. Versus Nitish G. Kotak & Anr. ..Defendants. Mr. Ajay Khaire i/b M/s. M.S. Bodhanwalla & Co., for the plaintiff. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : January 25, 2010. P. C. : 1. The above suit is filed under the provisions of Order-XXXVII Rule-2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for recovery of an amount of Rs.92,926.92 paise with further service charges @2.5% p.m.. Though the suit is filed as long as back in the year 1993, the plaintiff has not taken any steps in the matter. At the request of the learned counsel for the plaintiff suit was adjourned from time to time to enable the plaintiff to take appropriate steps in the matter. On 8th January 2010, the suit was placed on board for direction and on that day this Court passed following order. “This suit is filed under the provisions of Order-XXXII Rule-2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Since filing of the suit the plaintiff has not taken any steps and therefore the office is directed to place the matter on 15th January 2010 under the caption dismissal for non compliance of the provisions of Rule-227 of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules, 1980.” 2. Thereafter also the suit appeared on board on 15th January 2010 and at the request of the learned counsel for the plaintiff the suit was adjourned -: 2 :- to enable the plaintiff to take appropriate steps. Today also the learned counsel for the plaintiff could not give any explanation for non compliance of the provisions of Rule-227 of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules, 1980. The suit is, therefore, dismissed for want of steps under the said provisions. (R.V. MORE, J.)