IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4988 of 2010 RITESH KUMAR @ TINKU, SON OF SHRI KRISHNANDAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 364, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner has been named in the confessional statement of the co-accused that he had active complicity in the kidnapping of the victim for the purposes of ransom and later on was done to death, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the serious nature of the offence. It has been submitted that the charges have only been framed under Sections 364, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code so the trial court is directed to consider whether Section 364A I.P.C. would be made out in the facts of the case and do the needful. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)