IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Contempt Petition No. 316 of 2006 With Restoration Application No.970/07 Ramkesh Shukl S/o Late Sri Ram Autar Shukl, R/o Village And Post Janmoo, District Banda (U.P.) …Petitioner Vs 1. Sri N. Ram Chandran, the Chief Secretary, Government of Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 2. Sri S.S. Sandhu, Chairman Cum Managing Director, State Industrial Development Corporation of Uttaranchal, Dehradun. ….Respondents Sri K.S. Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Shashikant Shandilya, Advocate holding brief of Sri P.R. Mullick, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Grounds shown for restoration of the case are sufficient. Restoration application is allowed. The order Dt. 10-7.2007 is hereby recalled and the contempt petition is restored to its original number. By means of this contempt petition, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed to punish the respondents for fluting the order dated 7-10-2005 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 1383 of 2005(S/S) Ramkesh Shukl Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others. Sri Shashikant Shandilya, learned counsel for the respondent No.3 made a statement that the order has been compiled with and the representation had already been decided by the Authority concerned. The compliance order has been annexed as annexure No. 6 to the counter affidavit filed by the respondent. It reveals from the counter affidavit that the representation of the petitioner was decided by speaking order. The contempt petition is dismissed. Notices are hereby discharged If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order, which has been passed on the representation, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy before appropriate forum as provide under the law available to the petitioner. With the aforesaid observation, the contempt petition is dismissed. Notices are hereby discharged. All application stands disposed of accordingly. (B.S. Verma, J) Dated: -8-8-2007 M.K.