mW,Ww1—G5,W W mCwwvWVWw/Wui 200 mm (13W) VD; m W 200 3mm (13W) it WWW WWW WW WW wm'm “1» amfmm The oniy ground urged by rned coumei for the petitioners is tha no part of cause af action arose thin the territoria! jurisdictian af learned tria! ceurt, as is evident fmm the R and the statement of witnesses and therefere, the tria! court has no juri dictinn to try the effence. i have heard learned eouns lfor the parties. The eharge under seciione QS—A & 406 cf rhe rPC has been framed against the appiicants with the all gatlcns that the cemplainant, who ls the wife of applicant No.1, was subje edto cruelty & torture by the applicants while she was staying with them i her matrimonial heuse and there is alse an aliegatian against them that c rtain properties of the complainant were entrusted to the applicants at the ime of marriage and the same have net been returned to the complainan wife and thus, they have committed an offence of criminal breach of trust unishable under Swtion 406 of tPC, Taking into considerationt tthere is prima-facie evidence availabte in the charge sheet that the o ence of criminal breach of trust was committed within the territorial iu 'sdiction of the trial court, the impugned order passed by the triai court d not call for any interference in exercise W, of jurisdiction under Section 482 o Cr.P.C. tn the result, the petition eing devoid of substance is tiable to be dismissed and it is hereby dismiss d. Sdl- - EWHRENDRAIME&EUk Judge ])’ GRPRJ e— FS/246—~ 2/2007 ~> 50,000. / i I a ” o