IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2009 / 2ND ASHADHA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 566 of 2009(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C)5932/2008 Dated 20/02/2008 .................... PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. SUBAIDA, W/O.BASHEER, AGED 48 YEARS, RUBEENA MANZIL, KULASEKHARAMANGALAM P.O., VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. SRI.BASHEER, S/O.MOIDEEN KUTTY, AGED 57 YEARS, RUBEENA MANZIL, KULASEKHARAMANGALAM P.O., VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DIST. BY ADV. MR. P.SANTHOSH KUMAR (PANAMPALLI NAGAR) MR. LUIZ GODWIN D'COURT MR. K.P.CHANDRASEKHAR RESPONDENTS:- ------------------ SRI.MOHANDAS, AGED 53 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER TAHSILDAR, VAIKOM TALUK, VAIKOM. ADV. MR. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- COC No.566 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 23rd day of June, 2009 J U D G M E N T Grievance in the contempt case is regarding the delay on the part of the respondent in complying with the directions in the judgment in WP(C) No.5932/2008. 2. In the said judgment, it was directed that action shall be taken on Exts.P3 & P5, where the petitioners sought survey of their property. 3. The learned Government Pleader justifies the delay on the basis that there is a reduction of 11 cents, going by the extent as shown in the survey records. However, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that all that they seek is survey of the property as available, and a sketch of the same. 4. If the requirement of the petitioners is as above, even if there is a reduction in the actual extent of land available, that need not have stand in the way of the respondent in completing the survey as sought for. COC No.566/2009 -2- 5. At this stage, the learned Government Pleader submits that the survey process will be completed within two weeks. I record the submission, and the contempt case is closed. The petitioners shall produce copy of this judgment before the respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg