IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.3166 OF 2008 State Bank of India ...Plaintiff Vs. Balu Jagtap ...Defendant --- Mr. Prasad Das i/b. Goenkar Law Associates for Plaintiff None for Defendant ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 31ST JULY, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff has filed the affidavit of service. The report of the Sheriff's office indicates that the Defendant is served. 2. None appears on behalf of the Defendant, though he has served. The Plaintiff bank had given a personal loan to the Defendant. The Defendant had executed a written agreement with the bank. Though the said bank become due and payable, the Defendant has failed to pay the said amount and, therefore, this suit has been filed by the Plaintiff under Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Code. Since no appearance has been filed by the Defendant within 10 days from the date of notice, the Plaintiff is entitled for judgment and decree. Suit is decreed in terms of prayer clause 16 (a). V.M. KANADE J.