IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 22ND DECEMBER 2011 / 1ST POUSHA 1933 CRL.MC.No. 4405 of 2011 ---------------------------- (IN CRIME NO:100/2009 OF KUNDARA POLICE STATION, NOW PENDING BEFORE THE ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT, KOLLAM AS SC.1476/2010) .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED-A1 & A2 : --------------------------------------- 1. RAJ, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O. LAWRANCE, THADATHIVILA THEKKATHIL VEEDU, KUMBALAM MURI, MULAVANA VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. SURESH, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. ANTONY, ALUVILA VEEDU, KUMBALAM MURI, MULAVANA VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.V. ANIL KUMAR RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT : ---------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNDARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. JOHN DANIEL, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. DANIEL, MAVILAYIL VEEDU, IVERKALA WEST-NORTH CHERRY, KUNNATHUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. PIN - 691 001. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. RAJESH VIJAYAN FOR R1 & R2 ADV. SRI. SANGHEETH L.Y. FOR R3 THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: SP CRL.MC.No. 4405 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:- 1. ANNEXURE A - COPY OF THE FIR & FIS IUN CRIME NO: 100/2009 OF KUNDARA POLICE STATION. 2. ANNEXURE B - COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN CRIME NO:100/2009 OF KUNDARA POLICE STATION. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. SP N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.4405 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of December 2011 O R D E R Petitioners are accused Nos.1 and 2 in S.C.No.1476/2010 on the file of Assistant Sessions Court, Kollam. The offences alleged against them are under Secs.341, 294(b), 323, 324 and 308 r\w 34 IPC. The de- facto complainant is stated to be the brother-in-law of the first accused. He is represented in this Court by his counsel. It is submitted by both sides that the incident arose out of a family dispute and that the family dispute has already been settled. It is stated that this case also has been settled out of court. Affidavit to that effect has been filed. In view of the settlement arrived at, this Crl.M.C. is allowed. Proceeding against these petitioners in S.C.No.1476/2010 on the file of Assistant Sessions Court, Kollam is quashed. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt