@ HIGH COURT OF CHHATT}SGARH AT BILASPUR P. i3! N0. 1z25 of 2008 Petitioner Respondents Tehsi! 8: Distt. — Durg (C.G.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through — Secretary, Department of School Education Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director Public Instruction, Lek Shikshan Sanchnalay. Raipur Pensan Bada, Raipur Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) Diett. Education Officer Durg. Distt. — Durg (C.G.) I OIN UNDER AR‘UqaE 22§L227 QF TH£$QN$TETQTION Sinie Eench :Hon'ple Mr. Sat§sh K. Agnihotri, J. 3. R. P. Sinha Slo Late R. C. P. Sinha, Aged about 61 years, Head Master, Govt. Middle SchooL Pathriya, B!ock— Dhamadha, Distt. — Durg (C.G.) R/o Near Sahu Sedan, Kelabari, Durg, Shri C. R. Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A. S. Kachwaha. Deputy Advocate Genera! for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 27m day of February, 2008) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to press the matter on merit. However, the petitioner seeks permission to pursue his representation dated 12.1 1 .200? (Annexure P/4). Learned Deputy Advocate Generai, appearing for the respondents. submits that there is no reason if any representation is pending, that wiii not be considered. expeditiousiy. tis ordered. accordingiy. in view of the foregoing, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge , WRT PET'T ' g @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATT£SGARH AT BILA$PUR WP. {S} No. 1275 of 2008 Petitioner R. P. Sinha S/o Late R. C. P. Sinha, Aged about 61 years, Head Master, Govt. Middle SchooL Pathriya. Block- Dhamadha, Distt. — Durg (C.G.) Rio Near $ahu sadan, Keiabari. Durg. Tehsi! & Distt. ‘ Durg (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through — Secretary, Department of Schooi Education Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director Public Instruction, Lok Shikshan Sanchnalay. Raipur Pensan Bada, Raipur Distt: Raipur (C.G.) 3. Distt. Education Oftioer Burg. Distt. —- Durg (C.G.) Mfr PETEQIN UNDER ARTICLE zg§1227 9F Tl1§§ON$TETUTION Singie Eench : Hon'pie Mr. Sadsh K. Agnihotri, J. Shri C. R. Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A. S. Kachwaha. Deputy Advocate General for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 27’" day at February, 2008) Learned counse! appearingr for the petitioner, on inetructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to press the matter on merit. However, the petitioner seeks permission to pursue his representation dated 12.1 1 .2007 (Annexure PM). Learned Deputy Advocate Generai, appearing for the respondents. submits that there is no reason if any representation is pending, that wilt not be considered, expeditiousiy. tis ordered, accordingly. in View of the foregoing, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge 4, er . “‘ry. ,, -ur ,_, .VN 1.