12.8.2008 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar with Mr. M.A.Khan, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Sharma, counsel for respondents. CMP(M) No. 686 of 2008. For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the review petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. Civil Review No. 49 of 2008 Heard. The only ground raised in the review petition is that the petitioner has been out of job since 1987 and therefore, the compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- awarded in lieu of his reinstatement is very low. This Court, while considering the relief to be granted to the petitioner and keeping in view the law laid down by the apex Court, came to the conclusion that even if the order of removal is set-aside the fresh inquiry may have to be initiated against the petitioner. It was in these circumstances that by balancing the equities, we had come to the conclusion that the petitioner should be entitled to Rs.2,00,000/-. This is a considered opinion. There is no error apparent on the face of the record. Therefore, there is no merit in the review petition which is accordingly rejected. ( Deepak Gupta ), J. August 12, 2008 (Rajiv Sharma), J. ™