IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10728 of 2008 RAVINDRA KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5 10.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Basic grievance of the petitioner was that even though the departmental proceeding initiated against him had concluded but his suspension order passed way back in the year 2006 has not been revoked. Vide memo no. 2724 dated 01.09.2008 an order was passed revoking the suspension of the petitioner from 03.08.2007. A copy of the same has been produced and handed over to learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well. In view of the order dated 01.09.2008, the basic grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, the present writ application has become infructuous. If the petitioner is agreed by the punishment order/orders in question, he is free to assail the same or pursue his remedy with the department. The writ application stands disposed of with the above direction. Rajeev/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)