IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.3842 of 2008 ====================================================== RUPAM RAI, W/O SHRI ARUN KUMAR, R/O VILLAGE AND P.O.-DHURLAKH, P.S AND DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE HEAD SECRETARY, THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE COLLECTOR, SAMASTIPUR. 4. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR. 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR. 6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SAMASTIPUR. 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, JITWARPUR. 8. THE BLOCK EDUCATIONAL EXTENSION OFFICER, JITWARPUR, SAMASTIPUR. 9. THE SUPERVISOR, BLOCK AND DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. 10. SMT. JANKI DEVI, MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, SHAMBHUPATTI, BLOCK AND DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. 11. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, SHAMBHUPATTI, BLOCK AND DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR 12. RAUSHAN SHARMA, W/O SHRI SUKHDEO SHARMA, R/O VILLAGE-BHUIDHARA, P.O.-DHURLAKH, P.S. AND DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhubneshwar Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp12) ====================================================== 4 11-07-2011 I.A. No.4367 of 2011 Petitioner has filed this I.A. bringing on record an order of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority dated 20.08.2010 passed during the pendency of this writ application and has sought liberty to challenge the same also. The I.A. is allowed. Petitioner is granted liberty to challenge the said order of the Appellate Authority. From the order of the Appellate Authority dated 20.08.2010, it appears that on the basis of the records and reports of the authorities the Appellate Authority came to the finding that on the date of selection i.e. 09.03.2007 petitioner and others had not appeared before the Selection Committee. Hence, a candidate from the waiting list was appointed. This is a pure question of fact. There is nothing on record to suggest that the Appellate Authority has committed any error of record in respect of the said finding. In the circumstances, this Court does not find any merit in the writ application and the same is dismissed. Arvind/ (Jayanandan Singh, J)