BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fifteenth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14788 of 2011 1 SEENIKUMAR [A4] 2 SURYA [A5] 3 SANKAR [A6] 4 MUTHUKUMAR [A8] 5 KAPIL DEV [A9] 6 SENTHIL [A10] 7 MANIKANDAN [A11] 8 MUTHUKUMAR [A12] 9 PRATHEEP [A13] ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THADICOMBU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. CRIME NO.567 OF 11 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S.P.RAJKUMAR ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.C.RAMESH GOVT. ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE) PETITION FOR BAIL UNDER SEC. 439 CR.P.C. ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioners are accused and they were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.09.2009 for the alleged commission of offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 323, 324, 364 and 307 I.P.C. in Crime No.567 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek bail. 2.Heard Mr.P.Rajkumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for bail in favour of the petitioners. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) would submit in his argument that the investigation is pending and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners there should be a stringent condition for the accused persons. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Considering the submissions made by both sides, I could see that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital and even though the petitioners are stated to be the students of the college concerned, no documents have been produced to that effect and under the said circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with stringent condition. this Court is inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail and the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. sd/- 15/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, DINDIGUL. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THADICOMBU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 4 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, DISTRICT PRISON, DINDIGUL. 5 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, BORSTAL SCHOOL, MELUR. 6 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC TO M/S. P.RAJKUMAR ADVOCATE SR.NO.39626. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14788 of 2011 Date :15/11/2011 2P/8C RPB : 15.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/