I! ‘ §n§le Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NoH HLW OF 2011 PETITIONER: Taiyyab Hussain, Son of K“ Shri Akhtar Hussain, aged aboutl32 years, R/o Paarshad Ward l7, Near Mahila Thana, Police Line, Masaangunj, Bilaspur, District ‘ Bilaspur (C.G.)' ' - Versus - / RESPONDENTS: ’ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development, Mantralaya, D.K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Urban Administration and Development, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) The Commissioner, Urban Administration and Development, 'State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT WRITS DIRECTIONS ETC. IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI AND OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKE NATURE A” swat, Mir $ ’ HIGH CGURT OF CHHATTISGARE AT BILASFUR WRIT PETI'I‘ION (’C) N0. 4799 of 2011 E’ETITIONER : Taiyyab Hussain. VERSUS RESPONDENTS Staie ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETI’HON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONS'I'ITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Dr. N.K.Shukla. Senior Advocate with Shri Shaiiendra Shukla. Advocate for the petiiioner. Shri V. V.S.Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Shri J.A.Lohani, Advocate for the respondent No. 4. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 23r day of Augast, 2011) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a better petition. Learned counsel appearing for other side have no obj ection. It is ordered accordingly. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the Sd/~ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge aforestated liberty, if so advised. w I i ”o?n” A