IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 4900 of 2009 Between: 1 S. Damayanthi W/o. Ramu R/o. Anthkapalli Village, Rajam Mandalam, Srikakulam District. 2 A. Damayanthi W/o. Chinnamnaidu R/o. Anthkapalli Village, Rajam Mandalam, Srikakulam District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector (Panchayat Raj Wing) Srikakulam, Srikakulam District, 2 District Panchayat Officer, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District, .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order/s or Direction /s more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2ithout inciting department action as per law for recovery the misappropriate funds by disposing the case pending before the second respondent against the Show Cause notice No. 1065 dt. 15-12- 2008 by trying to entrust all powers to Samanthula Bharathi Surpanch of Anthkapili Grampanchayat, pending the Charges/enquiry against the law, arbitrary unconstitutional and violation of the principles of natural justice without jurisdiction. Counsel for the Petitioners:SRI K.PURUSHOTHAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4900 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners apprehend that the 1st respondent may entrust the cheque drawing and other powers to the Sarpanch of Anthakapalli Gram Panchayat. It is represented that the 1st respondent passed orders, under the relevant provisions of law, suspending the cheque drawing powers of the Sarpanch and there is every likelihood of restoration thereof. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development. This writ petition cannot be entertained for more reasons than one. Firstly, no proceedings as such are challenged and the writ petition is filed on the basis of apprehension. Secondly, the Sarpanch is not made a party. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioners to approach this Court as and when cause of action arises. No costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J 13.03.2009 v v