In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 4040 of 2008 Date of decision: November 25, 2009 Ranbir and another .. Petitioners Vs. Satender and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Anil Kheterpal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rajesh Arora, Advocate for the respondents. A.N. Jindal, J The petitioners have invoked the provisions of Article 227 of Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 30.4.2008 (Annexure P-7) passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Gurgaon. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that he is not bound to inform the court about the subsequent sales when already the application for temporary injunction restraining him from alienating the property has been dismissed and the appeal against which has also been declined. In view of the matter, this petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioners shall record about the litigation pending in the court in the sale transaction at the time of sale of the property in favour of any person during the pendency of the appeal. November 25, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge