IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC NO.14392 OF 2007 SEEMA KUMARI, W/O ARBIND KUMAR SINGH, R/O VILLAGE SAWAR, POLICE STATION KARAMCHAT(SAWAR),DISTRICT KAIMUR. …………………PETITIONER. VERSUS 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PANCHAYAT RAJ SECRETARY, NEW SECRETARIATE, BIHAR, PATNA. 2.THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, PATNA. 3.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KAIMUR. 4.THE DISTRICT EDUCATION SUPERINTENDENT CUM DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BHABHUA, KAIMUR. 5.THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, AGHORA BLOCK, KAIMUR. 6.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, AGHORA BLOCK, KAIMUR. 7.THE MUKHIYA DIGHRA GRAM PANCHAYAT, DISTRICT KAIMUR. 8.THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, DIGARA BLOCK, KAIMUR. ………………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02/ 24.11.2011 Having heard counsel for the parties and taking into account the grievance relating to the termination of service of the petitioner from the post of Panchayat Shikshak in the first instance ought to have been raised before the statutory Authority in terms of Rule 18 of Bihar Panchayat Shikshak Appointment Rules 2006, that having been not done, this application must be held to be misconceived. That being so, this application is, accordingly, dismissed. Such dismissal will not come in the way of the petitioner in filing a complaint before the District 2 Teachers Appellate Authority, which shall go into the question of termination of the service of the petitioner and decide the same on merits if a complaint is filed by the petitioner within a period of one month from today and shall not non suit the petitioner on the ground of delay and laches. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)