MGJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Letters Patent Appeal No. 264 of 2006 Shri Shambhu Bansi Yadav ..Appellant vs. Secretary/Chairman, Hindi Shikshan Prasarak Mandal & Ors. ..Respondents Shri N.V.Bandivadekar for appellant,. Shri Sanjay Udeshi i/b M/s Sanjay Udeshi and Co. for respondent no.1 CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. 27th February, 2007 27th February, 2007 27th February, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. We have perused the order of the learned single Judge. Whether the resignation was taken or not by force is a matter of fact. School Tribunal and the learned single Judge have found that the resignation was not taken by force. Under these circumstances, we refrain to entertain the L.P.A. L.P.A is rejected. (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.)