IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20559 of 2008 PINTU KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 07.7.2008. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Baniapur P.S.Case No.88 of 2007 registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and prays for grant of anticipatory bail. Mr.Satyendra Kumar Singh, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has not been named in the first information report and as such, he deserves to be granted anticipatory bail. Mr. D. Saurendra, Additional Public Prosecutor, appears for the State. True it is that the petitioner has not been named in the first information report but his complicity in the crime has surfaced during the course of investigation. Having heard counsel for the party and taking into consideration the nature of allegation and material available, I am not inclined to accede to the prayer of the petitioner. Application stands dismissed. (C.K.Prasad) ahk