IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 31 OF 2007 IN ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 190 OF 2006 Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. ).. Petitioners Versus M/s. Kiran Construction Co. ).. Respondent Mr. S.R. Rajguru for the Petitioners. Mr.Devvrat Dhankar i/b S.S. Phadke for the Respondednt. CORAM : J.N. PATEL, ACTING C.J. DATED : 15TH JANUARY 2010 P.C. Heard. The learned Counsel appearing for the Review Petitioner submits that the Chairman-cum-Managing Director of the Petitioners who was appointed as Arbitrator is not in a position to take up the matter because of his pre-occupation and, therefore, he should be permitted to appoint any other official as Arbitrator in place of the Chairman-Cum-Managing Director. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent submits that the Petitioners may appoint any other official as Arbitrator who should not be considered with the execution of the Work which has been carried out by the Respondent. Mr.Rajguru, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, assures the Court that the Petitioners will nominate the official who is not concerned with the execution of the Work purported to be carried out by the Respondent. 3. Review Petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the Petitioners to nominate an official who is not concerned with the execution of the Work purported to be carried out by the Respondent within a period of four weeks from today who shall dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible. No order as to costs. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE