^.^-^ IN THB HIGH OOURT OP CI1HATTISGARH AT BILASPT. WK1T mTIT.ZON N0 .2£iB '2-DF 2003 ^-^ 1 ,^ IETITIONER KESB33MI^N1B , / Smfc^ AI]<Q Jain^ wife of Shri Rajendra Kumer Jain^ aged aboufc 37 years^ ( Assisfcent Professor ) 9 residenfc of Manjusha Njj®as^ Deviganj Road^ ^nbikapur^ Disfct $ Surguja ( C- G 5 . V BR.SU S .^^' .•••" ^t\^'\^l^' ,S<A ^^: <»c>y ..-•' ^^ ^ s 1< State of Chhattisgarh fchrough the Secretary^ Department of Higher Education^ DJ<»8« Bhawan^ Raipur ( C•G ). 2^ • Commissioner, Higher Sduca- tion^ D»K<,S, Bhawan^ Raipur ( C'G ) , 3, Tte IPrincipal, Covte Girls Co1lege ^ Ambikapur^ Distfc : Surguj/a ( C G ). y / / y^L^^^^L^^^^SSSS^.^.^^L.SS.JS^^SSSSSSli OF IMDIA 1_ XI-HC-22 31^T'^T f<rli<=h ^T^T 5b^i<^ ^f^a :x >^ ) 's^ ^ii^icn^, ^Tii<-t^<o, i®i<is^t^< ^^s..^ WR^ITWW^ fN^T' 3TI^T ^RTTW <yfea thfe Cohimis^jon, 13.9-2QQ3 Hecrd Shri V.K. Pondey, cour^ The petitioner has prefer^ed 226/227 of the Constitution of petitioner is that she js rot respondents. Facts leading to filing of ^orking as Assistant Professor (H4r ^jrb Coikge, Ambikapur slnce 8a selected by the Public Service Professor on 221ri February 1993. rcport before respondent No.3 abr^ Stote AdministrQtive TribunbS, payment of increment in th©case Th©pctitioner made repres©ntati4$ before res^ndents, but respond€r|ts petitioner filed.an appljcation for find hearing. Now/the aboli^hed» The Tribund has whcreby the Tribunal hos given th^ pjaced persons. But, in spite of sev^ not gronting two grade increments |^e! for the petitioner. this writ petition under Articles [India and thc mdn gnevance of the g^c it©d two grade increments by the befohe St4te pQiSS^d <=ht4id4lrl 'TO^Tf ^ ^S iPsi-^rK ^^eR^n^T writ petition are that the petitjoner is ^m@ Science bepartnient) in @ov©rnment 11-89 ond later on the petitioner was i, Madhya Pradesh as Assistont Jhs. petitioner ^ubmitted her joining with degrec of M- Phil. I, Madhya Pradesh possed an order for jof mcny other simjlarly pbced persons, |n regarding the payment of increment have not considered the same. Thc the Tribunai Qnd th©CQS€ woss fixed AdministratJve Tribund has bcen ordcrs in many other jdenticQl cases ^ benefit of increment to the similarjy trd representations the respondents ar@ the petitioner. tb ^ ^ ^qr^ ^RS^ XI-HC-22 ^n^T^T ^l<=h ^TT^T '^R ^Tl Barve: ^"^f ^|141d<L(, ^xllwKo, fa^ll^y 3TT^?T 'q^? '^ *<I^Crll -gpq^'—*•*•—*——••——•••'•""• ^y^ 200 •I^^T' ^TT^T'^^TT^R'^f^T -^ The lecsrned counse! for th| i^ho pssess the degree of M. Phil iookjng to this provision other le| grade increments, wherec^ the Increments to the petitioner c^e r^Si arld representation before the respond^nts but they h Having regord to the fact| allowed to make a repre^entotion b^ 10 days rdsing a!l her grievonces{ simibriy ptoced persons have be^ respondent No.2 after receiving t^ decide the same ^ithisl a period appropriate order for disposing of t( With these observation, the Consequently, M.(W.)P. No. stand disposed of. Parties ore sntitled for certi cbl^i<rl^l4 'WT^t^ft^ it^i^K ^5'^rf^R^T^T petstioner submits thot the lecturers entitled for two grade increments and Iturers have already been granted t^o ^spondents hove not gronted two grade that ss why the petitioner made ^nts but they have not decided the same. t'| ond circumstances/ the petitioner is tfore respondent No.2 within a period of and mentioning d! the cases In which ^n granted two grade incremcnts and ^e repres€ntatiqnof the petitioner shatl |of 3 months by passing reosoned and !t(i€representotion of the petitioner. j^rit petition is disposed of. 1P80/2003 and I.A. hfo. 6323/20)3 atso ified copy of this order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [^^fe^ ^v N\\