WPMS No.234 of 2011 Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. Mr. T. A. Khan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that since the petitioner is not a Public Authority in view of Section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, no information under the Right to Information Act be sought from the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that the petitioner has submitted its representation dated 25.09.2010 before the respondent no.2 pursuant to the order dated 07.09.2010 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.1548/2010 (M/S). However, the representation of the petitioner has not been decided till date. Considering the facts and circumstances that has been brought on record, I dispose of the writ petition directing the Respondent no.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner within three weeks from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order. (Nirmal Yadav, J.) Vacation Judge Dated 03.02.2011 Rawat