wG CQUBT OE § HATHSGAR A! BILASPUR WP. g3} No. 4662 of 2006 Petitionef I. R. Mini‘ aged 56 yrsi Principak Govt. Boys Higher Secondary schooi Jashpur : Disn’Jashpur CG Versus State of Chhauisgarh. Through : The Secretary to the Govt. of 0.6. Schsdme Tribe and $chedule Caste Wkas Vibhag. Mantralaya, Raipur CG A- Respondents 2. The Assisiant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpumagar, Distt ~ Jashpur CG 3. The Coiiector, Jashpumagar, Distt — Jashpur CG Ku. Kamata Kerketta. Vtcs-Ptkxcipd Govt. Boys Higher Sesondary School : Jashpumagar, Dist: — JashpurCG 5hri Vinod Kumar Singh. Principat : Govt. Boys Higher Secondary schoo! (Joined) : Jashpur Disu — Jashpur CG WRIT PETITOIN UNDERARTICLE 2261227 OF TH§ CON‘S‘TWUTION OF iNDlA. SB: Hcn‘ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Shri Anurag Dayal Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. m ( Passed on this 16" day ofAp'rir, 2007) . The petitioner has tiled this petition challenging the transfer order dated 4.7.2006. By virtue of the interim order dated 30.8.2006, paseed by this Court, the petitioner is continuing at the originai piece of posting. . Be that as it may. with the passage of time this petition has become infructuous as period of transfer is not applicable forever. At this point of time there is no question to examine the vaiidity of the transfer order. However. the respondents are at liberty to pass awropriate orders keeping in view the public interest and administrative exigency. without insisting on compliance oi the impugned transfer order. . in view of the above. this petition stands disposed of. No ordergs to costs. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sd/- Thakur Smt Anju Ahuja. Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondents No. “i to 3.