C.R. No. 5845 of 2009 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 5845 of 2009 Date of Decision: October 13, 2009 Sucha Singh and another …..Petitioners Vs. Ajit Singh …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Gaurav Chopra, Advocate for the petitioners. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioners are surety and judgment debtor. By virtue of order dated February 26, 2008, objections filed by Resham Singh, Judgment Debtor, against the attachment of property of surety Sucha Singh (petitioner No.1) stand dismissed. Vide order dated October 1, 2008, an application for review of the order dated February 26, 2008 has been dismissed whereas vide order dated August 13, 2009 (annexure P-9), objections of petitioner surety against the attachment has been dismissed reiterating the order dated C.R. No. 5845 of 2009 [2] October 1, 2008. The adjudication of claims and objections to attachment fall under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC. As per Order 21 Rule 58 (4) CPC, any claim or objection adjudicated upon is subject to an appeal like a decree. The revision petition is thus not maintainable. Relegating the petitioners to avail the alternative remedy of appeal under Order 21 Rule 58 (4) CPC, the petition is disposed of. In case appeal is filed within two weeks after receipt of certified copy, delay will be condoned. October 13, 2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE