-1- Civil Revision No.927 of 2011 (O&M). IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Date of Decision: February 15, 2011. Civil Revision No.927 of 2011 (O&M). Barjinder Singh and another ... Petitioners VERSUS Major Singh and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL. 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- MOHINDER PAL, J. Defendants-petitioners, whose evidence has been closed by the trial Court before it could be concluded, are before this Court by way of filing this revision petition for setting aside the said order of the trial Court and allowing them the relief prayed for. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners -2- Civil Revision No.927 of 2011 (O&M). and keeping in view the interests of justice, instead of issuing notice of this petition to the plaintiffs-respondents, I deem it expedient to dispose this petition of by ordering the trial Court to allow the petitioner-defendants to conclude their evidence by allowing them one opportunity for the purpose subject to their depositing costs of Rs.5,000/- before it (trial Court). Ordered accordingly. In case the costs are paid, the same shall be paid to the plaintiffs-respondents. Resultantly, the impugned order is set aside and this petition is allowed to the extent indicated above. ( MOHINDER PAL ) February 15, 2011. JUDGE ak