^ o^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (CR.l No..^ OF 2011 PETITIONERS < ^/ I./ •>•"' \!^yx<< >^y .0\ l." Fatte Das S/o Alkoo Dehr^, aged about - 38 years, Caste- Satnami. 2. Rukhmani Bai W/o Fatte Das, aged about 35 years, Both's Occupation - Labourer & Agriculturist. Both are R/o village - Mulmula, Post - Pehdritarai, Police Station SE Tahsil - Bemetara, District -f Durg (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Superintendent of Police, Durg, District Durg (C.G.). 3. Station House Officer, Police Station- Bemetar, District Durg WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND DIRECTION RESPONDENTS 1 -HC-22 73 ^n^Rra, 'g^frff're. ^diyy 3 t)!»<wraitiich .f.^)i^.^^/n "^ 2'00 sn^r^i h-U'h 31E?I shw* 'dfta ^ ^ 311^1 ?^7WHf?g 28-04-2011 ^r^itri^l-i ^w^ ^ Ts^ <Fq^.i< ^'sipgiisn^i an $nnva ,4. Shri Sudnir Verma, counsel tor tr) Shri Suryakant Iviishra, Panei La' By this petiiion, the petitioner respondem No.3 to arresf the accused and also direct the respondents to do n( tias oravea ror issuance OT direction lo land Droduce before the Court concerned ^eclTul as per law. he case ot the petitioners is t(iat tne petrtioner No.,;: Vi'assuDiectea to raoe wi accusea namelv unan sai on lodged on 23/3/2011. Thereatter, th Z2/3/2011. A Sirst jntormation reDon was p police ot police station - uemetara reaistered crime in crime No.151/11,1 Section 450 and 376 IPC'. The potice that e statements unaer aection 161 being arresfed by respondent No.3 and| vvitnciraw tne r-tK. ne incident is staiea to navel iod.aed on 23/3/2011. According to th| nave Deen recoraea, Detrtioner No:z v4 poiice nas maae some investiaation regarding pressuring the petifioners is| ensure that proper investigaiion is madj case, the chaiian is not fiied within tw(|) revivemis petition. With the aforesaid observatiQnsl e petitioners. yyer Tor tne yiate/responaems. alleging commission OT onence unaer i presentiy carrying out investigation and nave Deen recordea, tne accusea is nol the police is pressuring fhe peiitioners to hapDened on 22/3/2011 and FIR was ^ petitioners, tne case diary statemems as sent t'or medical examination and the ne allegation maae in tne petiflon auite vaaue as to who naa raressunzea and in what manner. However, considering what h^s been stated in t'ne writ petnion, the resoonaent NQ.^: - Suoenntenaem OT Hoiice, uurg snali IOOK 'mo tne maner ana in tne maner, in accordance wnn law. in months Trom today, the petrtioners may the petition is finaiiv disoosed off. Sd/- Manindra IVlohan Shrivastava Judge