IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.R.BANNURMATH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2010 / 14TH POUSHA 1931 WA.No. 4 of 2010() ------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.25833/2009 Dated 26/11/2009 .................... APPELLANT(S): (APPELLANT) ------------------------- P.A.ISSAQUE, WE THREE ENTERPRISES, CUDUKATTA, KARAVALLOOR P.O., PUNALUR. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF RESPONDENT(S): (RESPONDENTS) ---------------------------- 1. KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY GENERAL MANAGER, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. CHIEF MANAGER, KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, DISTRICT OFFICE, Y.M.C.A. BUILDING, KOLLAM. BY SRI.A.A.ABUL HASSAN, S.C. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.R.BANNURMATH, C.J. & THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.A.No.4 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of January, 2010 JUDGMENT S.R.Bannurmath,C.J. Heard the learned counsel. The appellant is aggrieved by the conditional interim order granted by the learned single Judge while staying further proceedings in pursuance of Exts.P5 and P7. Learned single Judge, noting that the dues as on the date would be around Rs.16,00,000/- as per the re-scheduled version Ext.P5, has directed the appellant to deposit a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- within two weeks. Since this is a discretion exercised by the learned single Judge and more over, as the appeal is against an interim order, normally, this Court will not entertain the writ appeal. We do not find any merit in the contentions now raised. The appeal is dismissed. However, it is made clear that the appellant is at WA.4/10 2 liberty to move the learned single Judge for any alterations or modification of the interim order. Sd/- S.R.BANNURMATH, Chief Justice. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb/vgs.5/1.