Crl.M. No. M-28151 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-28151 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 8.10.2009. ... Sukhwinder Singh @ Lucky and another ................ Petitioners vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. B.S. Sewak, Advocate for the petitioners. ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) As per allegation of the prosecution, petitioner Sukhwinder Singh-petitioner No.1 gave injury on the head, whereas Balwinder Singh-petitioner No.2 has given grievous injury. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that Sukhwinder Singh-petitioner No.1 has been attributed only simple injury whereas injury attributed to Balwinder Singh - petitioner No.2 is on non-vital part. So, petitioners are entitled to the concession of anticipatory bail. I have carefully considered the said submission but do not find any force in that submission. The grant of anticipatory bail can be allowed only within the parameters. No exceptional circumstance Crl.M. No. M-28151 of 2009 -2- for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. The weapon of offence are yet to be recovered. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed. ( K.C. Puri ) 8.10.2009. Judge chugh