IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16063 of 2011 M/S Satish Stone Works Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 2 15.12.2011 The petitioner was granted crusher stockist / crusher licence bearing Licence No.03/03 for operating crusher machine. The Stockist / Crusher Licence of the petitioner was cancelled as the petitioner had not paid the interest due on the principal amount. From the impugned order dated 30.8.2011 cancelling the licence contained in Annexure-1, it appears that the licence has been cancelled on some other grounds as well. For instance, the petitioner had not made shade and done plantation. The petitioner submits that he would deposit the entire due interest and would do the needful to meet other conditions. Counsel for the Mines submits that an alternative remedy of revision is available to the petitioner in view of Rule 12 of the Bihar Mineral ( Prevention of illegal Mining, transportation and storage ) Rules, 2003 (hereinafter to be referred to as ‘the Rules). . In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the petitioner should file representation before the Mines Commissioner within a period of three weeks from today. In case an application for condonation of delay is filed the same would be considered sympathetically as the petitioner was pursuing his remedy before this Court. Further more the petitioner would deposit entire interest in bank draft which should be appended to the revision application. It would be open for the petitioner to undertake before 2 the learned Commissioner that he would ensure compliance of the other conditions of the Pollution Control Board. The learned Commissioner will dispose of the revision within a further period of three months from the date of its receipt. In the meantime, the petitioner’s unit would not be dismantled. AnilKrSinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)