((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.359 OF 2007 Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Pune Appellant versus Agasti S.S.K. Limited Respondent Vimal Gupta, APP. None for respondent. AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.360 OF 2007 Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Pune Appellant versus Dnyaneshwar S.S.K. Limited Respondent Vimal Gupta, APP. None for respondent. AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.361 OF 2007 Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Pune Appellant versus Dr.Padmashri Vikhe Patil SSK Ltd. Respondent Vimal Gupta, APP. None for respondent. AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.362 OF 2007 Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Pune Appellant versus Kedareshwar S.S.K. Limited Respondent Vimal Gupta, APP. None for respondent. AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.364 OF 2007 Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Pune Appellant versus Dnyneshwar S.S.K. Limited Respondent ((-2-)) Vimal Gupta, APP. None for respondent. AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.371 OF 2007 Commissioner of I.Tax-I, Kolhapur Appellant versus Vishwasrao Naik SSK Limited Respondent Vimal Gupta, APP. None for respondent. AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.373 OF 2007 Commissioner of I.Tax-I, Kolhapur Appellant versus Hutatma Kisan Ahir SSK Limited Respondent Vimal Gupta, APP. None for respondent. AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.375 OF 2007 Commissioner of I.Tax-I, Kolhapur Appellant versus Vasantdada S.S.K. Ltd. Respondent Vimal Gupta, APP. None for respondent. AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.377 OF 2007 Commissioner of I.Tax-I, Kolhapur Appellant versus Vasantdada S.S.K. Limited Respondent Vimal Gupta, APP. None for respondent. AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.379 OF 2007 Commissioner of I.Tax-IV, Pune Appellant versus Vithal S.S.K. Limited Respondent Vimal Gupta, APP. None for respondent. ((-3-)) AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.380 OF 2007 Commissioner of I.Tax-IV, Pune Appellant versus Shri Sidheshwar S.S.K.Ltd. Respondent Vimal Gupta, APP. None for respondent. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND A.A.KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATE : 12th August 2008 PC : 1. Questions framed in the memo of appeals as substantial questions of law are covered by the judgement of this Court reported in (2008)301-ITR-191 (Bom) and are answered against the Revenue. Hence, following this judgement, this appeal is dismissed. (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.)