1 Criminal Appln. 3429.11 in Criminal Appeal No. 410.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3429 OF 2011 in CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 410 OF 2011 Syed Sajed Ali S/o Syed Yakub Ali ... APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra .. RESPONDENT ..... Smt. S.S. Jadhav, Advocate for applicant Shri N.H. Borade, APP for the State ..... CORAM : U.D. SALVI, J. DATED : 25 th August, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard. Perused application and the record. 2. The applicant / accused has been convicted of the offenses punishable Under Section 7 and 13(1) (d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and has been sentenced to suffer four and five years R.I. on respective counts and to pay total fine of Rs. 15,000/-. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicant, submitted that the applicant / accused has been falsely implicated in the present case out of the grudge of not obliging the complainant by removing 2 Criminal Appln. 3429.11 in Criminal Appeal No. 410.11 the names of his aunts from the revenue records. According to the learned Advocate, the applicant / accused has been on the bail during the trial and had not committed any breach of the conditions stipulated for the grant of bail. 4. Refusing to grant bail in the given circumstances, would serve no legitimate cause. It is pointed out that fine amount has been paid by the applicant / accused. Hence order. ORDER The applicant / accused shall be released on bail on executing P.R. bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Rs. Fifteen thousand only) with one surety in the like amount. The application for bail stands disposed off accordingly. ( U.D. SALVI, J. ) SDM* August-11