IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 2662 (MS) of 2011 Dr. Mahesh Pathak …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Mr. G.S. Negi and Mr. Naresh Kumar Garg, Advocates present for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Standing Counsel present for the State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) 1. Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate present for the petitioner and Mr. H.M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. The petitioner is one of the Directors of shareholder of the company, who is seeking a writ, order or direction from this Court directing the administration to restrain “Anti Social Elements” from encroaching upon the property of the company. All the same, the petitioner has not been able to show this Court as to what restrained the petitioner from invoking the remedy of approaching the civil court for the relief. In absence of any satisfactory reply, no interference is required by this Court on the pleadings and prayer made by the petitioner in the writ petition. 3. The writ petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. 4. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) Dated: 19.12.2011 VKG