... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.68 OF 2006 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.61 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Rajesh Datar for the Applicants. Shri D.A. Patil for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard counsel appearing for the parties. It is clarified that pendency of Revision Application and ad-interim order granted by this court in the said Revision Application staying further proceedings in the suit will not affect or preclude the District Court, Thane to consider the Misc. Civil Application No.03 of 2006 for the purpose of grant or non-grant of ad-interim relief which power is possessed by the Court in terms of section 9A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 assuming that the same was still on the statute. Even otherwise for the ends of justice that course will have to be left open to be considered by the Trial ... 2 ... Court. 2. It is made clear that the Appellate Court can proceed to consider the matter only for the purpose of ad-interim relief. Application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE