IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.676 of 2006 KAILASH PRASAD Versus RAGHUNATH SARAN & ANR ----------- 2 11.7.2008 After some arguments, Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application in view of the fact that the Court below has in the same order itself first part has debarred the petitioner by striking off his defence against ejectment in view of non-compliance of the order under Section 15 of the Act. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that unless that part of order is set aside, he cannot effectively maintain his present civil revision application against the second part of the order refusing amendment in his written statement. He therefore seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty that if his prayer for striking off his defence is modified/recalled/set aside by a competent Court, he may be allowed to file his fresh civil revision application against the second part of the order. This Court without expressing any opinion on such submission of the Counsel of the petitioner would accord leave to withdraw his application with the aforementioned liberty. Accordingly, this application is permitted to be withdrawn. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)