IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 2215 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 03/12/2004 in WP NO : 22292 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 Boini Sathaiah, S/o.Venkaiah, R/o.Narregudem Village, Patancheruvu Mandal, Medak District. 2 Boini Peddulu, S/o.Venkaiah, R/o.Narregudem Village, Patancheruvu Mandal, Medak District. 3 Boini Mallesh, S/o.Venkaiah, R/o.Narregudem Village, Patancheruvu Mandal, Medak District. 4 Boini Balraj, S/o.Boini Sathaiah, R/o.Narregudem Village, Patancheruvu Mandal, Medak District. ..... APPELLANTS AND 1 M/s. Manjira Agricultural Company, a regd., firm, vide regd. No.10/96, rep. by its Managing partner G.Satyanarayana, S/o.Ramulu, MIG Railway Vihar, Seriligampally Mandal, R.R.District. 2. The Joint Collector, Medak Dist. at Sangareddy. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy Division at Sangareddy. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Patancheru Mandal, Dist. Medak. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants : MR.G.SHIVA KUMAR GOUD Counsel for the respondent No.1: MR. S. NIRANJAN REDDY. Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4: G.P. FOR REVENUE. The Court made the following : ORAL JUDGMENT: ( per Hon’ble The Chief Justice ) ….. 1. On 30.11.2004 Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy, passed an order, against which a revision petition was filed before the Joint Collector, Medak, at Sangareddy on 01.12.2004 and caveat was also filed by the appellants herein. Application for stay was directed to be taken up by the Joint Collector after two weeks. Therefore, on 02.12.2004 writ petition was filed by the writ petitioner – respondent No.1 herein, in which, by the order impugned in the appeal, an order was passed by the learned single Judge holding that since revision was filed, the same can be disposed of by the Joint Collector and till such time, there will be stay of all further proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants states that there was no occasion for filing writ petition. Learned counsel for 1st respondent states that writ petition has been filed since there was no interim order passed by the Joint Collector in the revision. 3. Be that as it may, on 04.01.2005 the Joint Collector in revision has already passed an interim order in favour of 1st respondent herein staying the operation of the order dated 30.11.2004 till the decision in the revision. In that view of the matter, the appeal itself has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. No costs. ____________________ DEVINDER GUPTA. C.J., _____________________ M. NARAYANA REDDY. J., Dated: 31.01.2005 VRK. To 1. The Joint Collector, Medak Dist. at Sangareddy. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy Division at Sangareddy, Medak District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Patancheru Mandal, Dist. Medak. 4. Two CCs to G.P., for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 5. Two CD copies. HON’BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. NARAYANA REDDY. W.A.NO. 2215 OF 2004. ( Judgment of the Bench delivered by Hon’ble The Chief Justice ) Dt: 31.01.2005.