HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4091 of 2011 ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction by way of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in insisting upon the petitioner to handover possession of the land admeasuring Acs.3.02 guntas in Survey No. 74/AA situated at Dhontapur Village of Dharmapuri Mandal to the respondents 3 to 6 in violation of the orders obtained by her in O.S. No.63 of 2009, pending on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge, Jagtial. It is the case of the petitioner that she is the owner and possessor of land admeasuring Acs.3.02 guntas situated in Survey No. 74/AA situated at Dhontapur Village of Dharmapuri Mandal. It is stated that she has acquired the said property by way of registered gift settlement deed dated 21.10.2008 and when there is interference with her possession over the property in question by the unofficial respondents herein, the petitioner approached the Civil Court and filed the suit in O.S No. 63 of 2009 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Jagtial and obtained injunction orders. The grievance of the petitioner is that in spite of injunction orders in favour of the petitioner, the respondents 1 and 2 at the instance of respondents 3 to 6 are interfering with her possession and are insisting upon her to handover the possession to respondents 3 to 6. Based on the written instructions sent by the Station House Officer, Dharmapuri Police station, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader for Home, that the 4th respondent has lodged a complaint on 7.2.2011 with the Station House Officer, Dharmapuri Police Station, stating that the petitioner and others have trespassed into the land and damaged the crops of the complainant by threatening him with dire consequences. He further stated that in view of the said complaint, a case is registered in Crime No.27 of 2011 under Sections 447 and 427 of I.P.C. and investigation is in progress. It is stated that the petitioner is shown as accused No.2 in the aforesaid crime and appropriate final report will be filed after completion of investigation. With reference to allegation of the petitioner that the respondents are insisting on the petitioner to handover possession to the unofficial respondents is concerned, it is stated that the respondents 1 and 2 never harassed the petitioner nor threatened her to handover the possession to the unofficial respondents. When a complaint is filed and case is registered, it is the duty of the police to investigate into the matter and such investigation cannot be termed as an interference. In any event, as it is submitted that the respondents 1 and 2 are not insisting on the petitioner to handover possession to the unofficial respondents nor threatened her in any manner, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, while placing the aforesaid statement of the learned Government Pleader on record. However, the respondents may complete the investigation and file appropriate final report in the matter. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY,J Date: 4th March, 2011 pnb