IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 18239 of 2009. [O&M] Date of Decision: 9th August 2010. Ram Kalesh & Ors. Petitioners through Mr. H.C.Arora, Advocate Versus U.T., Chandigarh & Ors. Respondents through Mr. Sanjay Kaushal, Advocate with Mr. Vishal Sodhi, Advocate. Mr. Indresh Goel, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioners,who are Jhuggi dwellers, seek a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to allot them alternative sites under the Licensing of Tenements and Sites and Services in Chandigarh Scheme, 1979, read with notification dated 28.8.2003 [Annexure P-2]. According to the petitioners, their Jhuggis were removed/demolished from Palsora colony on 25/26.06.2003 and as such they are entitled to be allotted alternative sites. Reply/affidavit has been filed by the respondents. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the eligibility of the petitioners for allotment of alternative accommodation/sites needs to be determined in the light of the directions already issued by this order vide order dated 17th March, 2009 passed in CWP No. 4101 of 2009 [Banta Singh & Ors. V Union Territory, Chandigarh & Ors. which was filed by the similarly situated persons. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the directions in Banta Singh's case [supra]. Needless to say that if the petitioners are found eligible, consequential allotment shall be made in their favour within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is received. Disposed of. Dasti. August 09, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE