IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2640 of 2007 SK.SALIM son of late Sk. Amjad, resident of village – Khiripaghar, Police station – Barahat, District – Banka. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The District Certificate Officer, Bhagalpur. 3. The Zonal Manager, State Bank of India, Patna. 4. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Sona Patti, Bhagalpur. ----------- 02. 04.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Submission of the counsel for the petitioner is that substantial amount of payment against the borrowing has already been made to the respondent Bank but still the present case has been brought against him making a claim of Rs.2,77,511/-. No substantial question of law against the proceeding as such has been raised except the above stated fact, but that is not good ground for the Court to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. One aspect which emerges from the record is that the petitioner has filed an objection under section 9 of the Act before the Certificate Officer. Let the Certificate Officer decide the objection and proceed with the matter accordingly. It is also clarified that if the petitioner and the bank would like to settle the dispute by some kind of arrangement then pendency of certificate case will not come in their way. The writ application stands disposed of with the above direction. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J ) 2