1 (Spl.- H.C.A.S.C.D., 78- e) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA PANAJI, GOA. APPELLATE SIDE DISTRICT : MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 454 OF 2004. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Quorum, appearances,Court's orders | Court's or Judge's orders of directions and Registrar's orders | _______________________________________________________________________ Shri S. G. Dessai, Senior Advocate with Shri Nitin Purushan, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri P. A. Kholkar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Shri Sudin Usgaonkar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. DATE : 19TH OCTOBER, 2004. P.C. : In filing First Appeal under Stamp No. 1360, there is a delay 2 and hence this application for condonation of the same. It appears that there is a delay of about 370 days. The Respondents have filed Affidavit in reply and opposed this application. The reasons for delay, having been caused, are set out in detail from para 3 onwards in this application and it has been supported by the Affidavit of the concerned Advocate. We are satisfied that good and sufficient reasons have been made out to condone the delay on levying costs. Hence the application is allowed and the delay is condoned by imposing costs of Rs.5000 /- , to be remitted to the State Legal 3 Service Authority within 2 weeks. List the Appeal for Admission thereafter. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. AN