IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11555 of 2010 1. SAGAR SAH S/O LATE CHHEDI SAH R/O VILL.- MAMADEO, P.S.- MOHANIA, DISTT.- KAIMUR, AT BHABHUA 2. THAKUR SAH S/O LATE CHHEDI SAH R/O VILL.- MAMADEO, P.S.- MOHANIA, DISTT.- KAIMUR, AT BHABHUA 3. NARAD SAH S/O LATE BHAGIRATH SAH R/O VILL.- MAMADEO, P.S.- MOHANIA, DISTT.- KAIMUR, AT BHABHUA Versus 1. RAM CHANDRA SAH S/O LATE KASHI SAH R/O VILL.- MAMADEO, P.S.- MOHANIA, DISTT.- KAIMUR AT BHABHUA 2. SANJAY SAH MINOR S/O RAM CHANDRA SAH THROUGH RAM CHANDRA SAH, FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF THE MINOR R/O VILL.- MAMADEO, P.S.- MOHANIA, DISTT.- KAIMUR AT BHABHUA ----------- 02. 28.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and for the State. The petitioners are the defendant in Title Suit No. 279 of 1999, aggrieved by the order dated 4.5.2010 by which their application dated 23.10.2008 to bring on record the voters list as an exhibit has been rejected. The impugned order holds that the voters list was sought to be produced much belatedly after framing of issues and no explanation had been given for such belated production of the same. In any event, the voters list sought to be produced as proof of parentage, for which the petitioner has otherwise more than avenue to lead other evidence. In any event, voters list is not conclusive proof by itself. There is no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)