HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21038 of 2008 Date : 07.09.2011 Between : K. Nagaraju. …..Petitioner And The District Collector, Krishna (CS), Machilipatnam & others. …..Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21038 of 2008 ORDER : This writ petition is filed questioning the proceedings of the 1st respondent, dated 19.09.2008, issued in Rc.B1.RP/13/2008. The petitioner was appointed as a fair price shop dealer of Ayyavarirudravaram village of Mandavalli Mandal in Krishna District. Questioning the selection and appointment of the petitioner, the 5th respondent carried the matter before the appellate authority. When the appeal was dismissed, it was further carried in revision before the 1st respondent. Pending revision, the revisional authority granted interim orders on 18.09.2008, in R.P.No.13/2008, in favour of respondent No.5 and the same is communicated to the petitioner by impugned order, dated 19.09.2008, issued in Proceedings Rc.B1.RP/13/2008. Questioning the said proceedings, this writ petition was filed in 2008, and this Court granted interim order on 17.11.2008, suspending the impugned proceedings and the said order continued all along. When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 4 that the revision petition filed by respondent No.5 is still pending consideration. In view of pendency of revision before the 1st respondent and also taking into account the fact that this Court granted interim order as early as on 17.11.2008, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent-revisional authority to dispose of the revision filed by the 5th respondent as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order and there shall be a further direction that the interim order, dated 18.09.2008, passed by the 1st respondent in R.P.No.13/2008, shall remain suspended till appropriate final orders are passed and communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of subject to the above directions. No costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 7th September 2011 ajr