IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22538 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Mahendra Singh, s/o- Late Ram Dahin Singh 2. Most Maya Devi, wife of Late Kameshwar Singh 3. Krishna Kant Singh, s/o- Late Kameshwar Singh 4. Ram Niranjan Singh, s/o- Late Kameshwar Singh All 1 to 4 residents of village Devi Dihra, P.S.- Rajpur, P.O.- Nagpur, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Collector, Buxar 2. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Buxar. 3. The Circle Officer, Chausa, Buxar. 4. Brij Raj Singh, s/o- Hawaldar Singh, r/o- mohalla Devi Dihra, P.S.- Rajpur, P.O.- Nagpur, District- Buxar. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Roy For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Kr No.2 GA5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL) 2 16-12-2011 The only grievance raised in the writ petition is that against the order passed by the learned D.C.L.R. on the mutation appeal preferred by the respondent No. 4, they have filed revision application before the respondent Collector being Mutation Revision No. 10 of 2011 which has not till date been considered and disposed of in accordance with law. It is contended that along with the memo of revision, the petitioners have also filed application seeking interim relief. Learned counsel further states that, in the meanwhile, by an order Patna High Court CWJC No.22538 of 2011 (2) dt.16-12-2011 2 dated 12.7.2011 (Annexure-6), the respondent Circle Officer has mutated the name of respondent No. 5 in respect of the lands in question. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, contends that in the fitness of things, Revisional Authority may be directed to dispose of the application expeditiously. He has also pointed out that the Circle Officer in the order dated 12.7.2011 (Annexure-6) has itself observed that the said order shall be subject to result of the pending revision application. After having heard the parties, I am satisfied that the present application be disposed of by the following order: Let the Revisional Authority (respondent No. 1) take appropriate step to dispose of the pending revision application being Mutation Revision No. 10 of 2011 as quickly as possible preferably within three (03) months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. PANKAJ KUMAR/- (Kishore K. Mandal, J)