IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD FEBRUARY 2010 / 14TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 3448 of 2010(E) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------- MINI JOY, AGED 32 YEARS, W/O.LATE K.K.JOY, KURIAPURAM HOUSE, IRINGOLE KARA, IRINGOLE P.O,PERUMBAVOOR VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.G.RAJAGOPAL. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED, (A GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ENTERPRISES), REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, CORPORATE OFFICE' "SOUDAMIL" PLOT NO.2 SECTOR 29,GURGOAN, HARIYANA 122 001. 2. THE CHIEF MANAGER, M/S. POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED, CONSTRUCTION AREA OFFICE, "CHANDINI" PLOT NO.190 B, MAVELIPURAM COLONY, P.O.KAKKANADU,KOCHI 682 030. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANADU, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY MR. MILLU DANDAPANI, S.C, R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. BIJOY CHANDRAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/02/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= W.P.(C) No. 3448 of 2010 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= Dated this the 3rd day of February, 2010 JUDGMENT Drawing of electric line through the property of the petitioner and erection of towers in the course of implementation of the project by the 1st respondent are stated as objected by the petitioner, who has approached the 3rd respondent by filing a series of representations, as borne by Exts.P7 and P9, which are still pending consideration. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, if the respondents are proceeding with further steps before finalizing the objections/representations, irreparable injury and hardship will be caused to her and hence, sought to be interfered with by this Court. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned standing counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 2 and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the 3rd respondent. W.P.(C) No. 3448/10 2 4. After considering the facts and circumstances, the 3rd respondent is directed to consider Exts.P7 and P9 representations in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity for hearing to the petitioner and others concerned and to have it finalized as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This writ petition is disposed of as above. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE mn.