/s^\ 1 ^iS^is I ^ -HC—78 ^^ •^' TSET •%|TqT^^ '^fi^FI^, "N^iTHy <6TWW ^Nieft "m^iQo W^I^T'f^W "^^fi w^^y ^^jcb ['' . w^?r ^CTT (1i?f5^^) ?1^ R ^fe^ W^ Writ PBTlTiONBRS: 1.1 2.! 3.1 4.1 EESPONDENTS: 1. 2,1 3. (Writ Petition uader Art! Btnsde Bencfa: Hoa?ble Shti Dhirendra Mislira* J. %^Nh ^ir^f ^ f^^ ^fe^K ^sffensmN Petitlon (Sj No.73/2009 Bhagwan Dau Chaudhari, S/o Late Mohan Lal Chaudhariy aged about 50 years, R/o Baramkeia, Raigarh (CG) Krishna Kaiit Patel, S/o Majriclhata Patel, aged about 46 years, R/o Clia-iitipaJi, Block- Barainkela, Distt- Ralgaiti (CG) Hii'alal Chaudhai-i, S/o Late Mohaii Lal Chaudhari, aged abozit 52 years, K'/o Chaiitipaii, Block Bai'amkela, Distt-Raigarh (CG) Heiaajit Kuiaar Patel, S/o Radheshaym Patel, aged about 41 yeai^, R/o Cuaulipali, lAx;k BaraDikela, Distt-Raigai'h (CG) -Vers^s- State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretaiy^ School Education Depai'toient, D.K.S. Bhawaii, Raipur Accountaiit General, Chhattisgarh, Raipm- (CG) Block Education Officer, Baramkela, Distt. Raigai'h (CG) icle226 of the Constitution of India) 12-01-2009:- ! Mn D.R. Patel, comi^el for tlie petitioners. Mr. Aitiii Sao, Govt. i\dvocate for tlie respondent/State, Ms. Sharmila Suigha^, counsel for respoudteut No,2. •—78 'TS^ ^Nrd-M, "3^t?F^, fSR;TRTy ^6 W^T'spT 1^?W ^I^T STI^T ^^Je^ ^iTRCfT^W^ "^200 3^T^5[^ ("^f^^) yRH^C "^^T ^T^T 2-- E ^FlfeNN 'RTR^f ^f fe^f ^[^R ^3TRR^?^f Heard. By the mstaiit p^tition, Uie petitioners have prayed for direction to respondent P) the exact total amouut d^posited in tlie GPF account, as tiiere is a difference ia the aniount GPF accoiuit and iii the ^G SUp issued by respondent No.2. Leanied counsel the representatiou aiicl reppesentaUon betore tJ^ grievaiices raised m tiiisS sarnie shail be consideij 0,2 to correct their GPF account aod show shown iii Uietr pass book issued towards for the petitioners submits tiiat the petitioners are not press|ng tliis petition at this stage, however, tlie petitioners niay be give4 opportunity to file fresh representation, raismg all tiieir grievaj|ices raised in this petition, before tlie respondent No,2, who, 41 tum, zaay be furfher dii'ected to decide 1:0 show exact aniount deposited iii tlietr GPF account, Ms, Shamiila Sui^hai, leanied counsel appeanng for tlie respondent No.2 submi^s that ta case Uie petitioners file fresh |e respondent No.2 for redressal of theu' petitioii along wifh copy of fhis order, the ?d aad decided by the respondent No.2 within. a period of twp Bionths from the date of receipt of representation, in vie\¥ of the ab<| parties, me iiistant pe1 petitioners to file fresh ^ve submission of leanied counsel for the Lition is disposed of with liberty to fhe representation before the respondent No.2 for redressal of their gr^vaiices raised ui this petition along with ^•:.^.^XI-HC—78 ^^r-^TfyiNr ^^T 3yi^T ^RN? "3"S[ '^TPqT^PT, ^^IWT^, t^Tray @ ^TR^IT ^»*tT«h ^200 3^'q?W(^t^^) ^^T^T'^f?^ 3fT?^I ^- ^N^4^ 'wr^f ^ fe^t ^fw$H ^T W^I copy of mis omer. Od respondent No,2 shaU wiflitu a period of twdi representation. such representation bemg made, tlie djecide fhe same expeditiously, preterably montlis fnom tfae date of rcceipt of Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge