IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 14TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 23RD KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 30128 of 2011(M) ------------------------------------ CRMP.2348/2011 of CHIEF JUDL.MAGISTRATE, ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER : - ---------------------- TREESA GEORGE, AGED 62 YEARS, W/O.LATE M.T. GEORGE, 3/377, MALIAKAL HOUSE, PALLIPORT P.O., MUNAMBAM, ERNAKULAM-683 515. BY ADVS. SRI.ROBIN THOMAS PHILIP SRI.BIJU JOSEPH RESPONDENTS : - -------------------------- 1. FEDERAL BANK LIMITED, BANERJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM NORTH, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 018. 2. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, FEDERAL BANK LIMITED, ASSET RECOVERY BRANCH, FEDERAL TOWERS, MARINE DRIVE, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 031. 3. M/S.MALIAKAL PLANTATIONS PVT.LTD., 3/378, MALIAKAL HOUSE, PALLIPORT P.O., MUNAMBAM, ERNAKULAM-683 515. 4. SHAIJU M.G., AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.LATE M.T. GEORGE, 3/377, MALIAKAL HOUSE, PALLIPORT P.O., MUNAMBAM, ERNAKULAM-683 515. 5. JOY K.P., S/O.POULOSE, AGED 54 YEARS, KAITHARAM HOUSE, CHERAI P.O., ERNAKULAM-683 514. 6. SHERBY PETER, W/O.PETER, AGED 40 YEARS, PANAKKAL HOUSE, KOTTAPURAM P.O., KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR-680 667. R1 BY ADVS. SRI.A.ANTONY SMT.LEELAMMA ANTONY R3. R4 & R6 BY SRI.SREEJITH S.NAIR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 30128 of 2011(M) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT P1 : COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 24.01.2011 ISSUED BY THE 2nd RESPONDENT. EXT P2 : COPY OF THE PAY-IN-SLIP DATED 06.05.2011. EXT P3 : COPY OF THE POSSESSION NOTICE DATED 10.05.2011 ISSUED BY THE 2nd RESPONDENT. EXT P4 : COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 31.05.2011 IN W.P. (C) 14651 / 2011. EXT P5 : COPIES OF THE PAY-IN-SLIPS. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE DMR/- S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.30128 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the mother of respondents 4 and 6. Amounts are due from respondents 3 to 6 to respondents 1 and 2 for which proceedings under the Securitistaion and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act have been initiated by respondents 1 and 2. The petitioner is challenging the same. 2. The learned counsel for the bank points out that respondents 3, 4 and 6 had earlier filed W.P.(C) No.14651/2011 and this Court had dismissed the writ petition by judgment dated 28.6.2011 and therefore, the mother of respondents 4 and 6 cannot now challenge the securitisation proceedings in a separate writ petition. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner only wants time till 31.12.2011 to pay off the entire W.P.(C)No.30128/11 2 amount. In the above circumstances, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to keep the further proceedings in abeyance till 31.12.2011. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd W.P.(C)No.30128/11 3