Crl.Misc No. M 9355 of 2009 (O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M 9355 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : December 08, 2009 Malak Singh and others, ...... Petitioner (s) v. State of Haryana, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S.Pattar, Sr. DAG Haryana for the respondent. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C for quashing of Calendra (Annexure P-3) on the ground that after the FIR was cancelled, the petitioners moved a protest petition which was allowed by a detailed order and the accused persons were summoned for the same offences as were mentioned in the original FIR. On the last date of hearing, the following order was passed :- “ Learned State counsel seeks an adjournment to find out any authority contrary to the authorities reported Crl.Misc No. M 9355 of 2009 (O&M) ::2:: as Sadhu Singh vs State of Punjab and others, 2003(2) Criminal Court Cases 383 (P&H), and Ramesh Chand vs State of Haryana, 2006(4) RCR (Criminal) 718, relied upon by counsel for the petitioners. To come up on 8.12.2009.” Counsel for the respondent has very gracefully stated that he has not been able to lay his hands on any contrary judgment. In the circumstances, keeping in view the judgments cited above, this petition is accepted and Calendra (Annexure P-3) is quashed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) December 08, 2009. JUDGE `kk'