IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 3182 of 2008. Decided on 25th August, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Hari Krishan Gupta. …Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Lokender Paul Thakur, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant A.G. None for respondents No. 3 and 4. For respondents No. 5 & 6. : Mr. Anuj Nag, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has already made a representation for the redressal of his grievance vide Annexure A/5 to the Financial Commissioner-Cum-Secretary (PW), Government of Himachal Pradesh. However, the same has not been decided till date. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Principal Secretary (PW) to decide the representation made by the petitioner vide Annexure A/5, within a period of ten weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that in case the grievance of the petitioner is redressed, he shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge August 25, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.