HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3785 OF 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner against the docket order dated 24-07-2010 in O.P. No.1355 of 2009 passed by the Family Court, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad whereby the trial Court set the petitioner herein ex parte and posted the matter for proof affidavit of the respondent. 2. Heard. 3. The respondent is the legally wedded wife of the petitioner herein and their marriage took place as per Christian rites and customs at Mar. Gregorios Orthodox Syrian Church, Bakaram, Hyderabad on 15-02-1993. Petitioner and the respondent lead their marital life for some time happily and thereafter, differences arose between them. Consequently, respondent filed F.C.O.P. No.1355 of 2009 before the Family Court, Hyderabad for dissolution of the marriage and for permanent alimony. When the matter came up for trial before the trial Court, the petitioner herein was set ex parte, as he was absent and the matter was posted for filing of proof of affidavit of the respondent. Hence, this revision. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the petitioner is residing in USA, he executed the GPA in favour of one C.P. Verghese to sign and file Vakalats, written statements etc., in the O.P., and that the petitioner requires 6 months time to come to India. Learned counsel further submits that the G.P.A. holder of the petitioner could not appear before the trial Court on 24-07-2010 when the matter was called, as he was fell ill and therefore, his absence is neither willful nor wanton. 5. The explanation offered by the learned counsel for the petitioner for non-appearance of the G.P.A. holder of the petitioner before the trial Court on 24-07-2010 is not supported by any medical evidence and, therefore, the same cannot be accepted. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that there are no merits in this revision and the same is liable to be dismissed. 7. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J September 09, 2010. KTL