IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5886 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 30, 2010 Balwinder Singh. …Petitioner Versus Ranjeet Singh and another. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Preetwinder Singh Dhaliwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed assailing the order dated 24.11.2009 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhudhlada, whereby an application moved by the plaintiff-respondent herein under Order 9 Rule 9 C.P.C. was allowed subject to payment of Rs.500/- as costs. The impugned order was passed on 24.11.2009, however, laches have not been explained as to why this petition is filed almost after ten months. Learned Civil Judge has observed in the impugned order that cardinal principle of justice is that each and every C.R. No. 5886 of 2010 case be heard and decided on merits and not on technical ground. Since, Trial Court has exercised discretion in favour of the plaintiff while restoring the suit, I am not inclined to exercise my supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition is dismissed. September 30, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2