IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18521 of 2011 UMESH MAHTO & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 14.6.2011 Heard. It is yet another instance of filing unnecessary petition under section 438 Cr.P.C., which is eating up most valuable time of this Court. The case is under sections 341, 323, 379/34 IPC and what appears is that there was a general allegation of crashing into the shop and thereafter assaulting the informant and snatching his gold chain and cash. What appears from the rejection order is that there was a dispute between the parties with regard to payment of rent and the landlord has foisted a false case so as to get the premises vacated. The learned court below while considering the prayer of the petitioners, directed them to surrender and pray for regular bail. The petitioners have simply flaunted the direction of the Sessions judge as if the direction was meaningless and was not to be respected. This is one reason that this Court is rejecting the prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail. The petition stands dismissed. The petitioners should surrender and prayer for regular bail before the court below. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)