IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 26684 of 2003 Between: M/s. D.S. Engineers, a Proprietary concern, rep by its Proprietor D. Srinivas Reddy, S/o. D. Sambi Reddy age : 35 years Occ : Business R/o. Plot No. 64, Maruthi Nagar, ECIL Post, Hyderabad - 500 062. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd. Parisram Bhavan, Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad. rep by its Vice Chariman & Managing Director 2 A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd. rep by its Zonal Manager, Moulali, Hyderabad-500 040. 3 D.V.V. Appala Raju S/o. D. Seetharama Raju Cherlapally, Hyderabad ( R3 is impleaded as per court order dt. 22-7-2004 in WPMP 1798 of 2004) 4 Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, rep. by its Vice Chairman and Managing director, Begumpet, Hyderabad (R4 is impleaded as per court order dt. 28-10-2004 in WPMP 23002 of 2004). .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records relating to Lr.No. 5147/IDA/CHP/PH-II/03 dt. 18-12-2003 issued by the 2nd respondent and to quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to disposses the petitioner from the plot bearing No. 27 of Phase II IDA, Cherlapalli, Ranga Reddy Dist. in furtherance to the said letter and also suspend the operation of the said letter of the 2nd respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondents No.1 & 2: MR.JANARDHAN RAO KOTAMA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent No.3: MR. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI. Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : S.C. FOR HUDA The Court made the following: Oral Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter dated 15-01-2005 to the effect that the petitioner intends to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a writ petition afresh in view of the fact that the official respondents have taken a decision to consider the case of the writ petitioner favourably. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’ granting liberty to file a writ petition afresh, if so advised. No costs. _________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dt. 24-01-2004 Pvks/* To 1. The Vice Chairman & Managing Director, A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd., Parisram Bhavan, Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad. 2. The Zonal Manager, A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd., Moulali, Hyderabad-500 040. 3. The Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, Begumpet, Hyderabad 4.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TSL}