SBCWP1177/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1177/2010 Mahesh Chandra Sharma and Another Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order ::: 31.03.2010 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Vikram Singh for Shri Satyendra Kumar Gupta, Counsel for petitioners #### By the Court:- Shri Vikram Singh, brief holder of Shri Satyendra Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for petitioners, has relied on a judgment dated 01.12.2009 of a coordinate bench of this Court in bunch of 7 writ petitions, leading case being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4728/2008 – Naveen Kumar Sharma & 16 Others Vs. State & Others, wherein following directions were given:- “Consequently, all these writ petitions are disposed of with the direction to the respondents to consider candidature of petitioners for appointment on the post of Teacher (Primary & Upper Primary Schools) on the basis of their selection made pursuant to advertisement dt.30/10/06 strictly in order of merit as per statement (supra) against available vacancies SBCWP1177/2010 // 2 // other than reserved for TSP area; and in case either of petitioners does not find place in order of merit in respective category for appointment, respondents shall inform each of them about his placement and reasons for which he could not be held eligible for appointment. Compliance be made within two months.” Contention of learned counsel for petitioners is that candidature of petitioners should also be considered in the light of aforesaid directions of this Court for their appointment on the post of Teacher (Primary & Upper Primary Schools) on the basis of their selection made pursuant to advertisement dated 30.10.2006, in response to which petitioners had also applied against available vacancies, as per their merit against available vacancies other than reserved for TSP area. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to make a representation to respondents No.1 and 2, who shall examine petitioners' case in the light of aforesaid judgment and in case any of petitioners does not find place in order of merit in respective category for appointment, respondents to inform them about their placement and reasons for which they could not be held eligible for appointment. The representation shall be decided and its decision shall be conveyed to SBCWP1177/2010 // 3 // petitioners within three months from the date of its submissions before respondents along- with a copy of this order. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//