IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14322 of 2001 NAND LAL KUMAR SINGH,ADVOCATE Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 16/4/2009 No one appears for the petitioner. Even on earlier occasion this case has been gone unrepresented. It appears that the dispute in this case is actually between the petitioner and Ramjee Paswan and Dhananjay Paswan who are respondent nos. 6 and 7 to this writ application. Grievance of the petitioner, that the aforesaid persons had executed sale deed in the name of the petitioner and yet by claiming ownership and possession of that very land they had obtained certain grant from the government for construction of house under Indira Awas scheme, would be in the zone of private dispute. The petitioner himself is an Advocate and thus ought to have known the ambit of writ jurisdiction. The counter affidavit filed by the official respondent nos. 1 to 5 also support the aforesaid finding of this Court wherein it has been stated that the sale deed claimed by the petitioner has 2 not come into force. That being so, the remedy for the petitioner would be a Title Suit before the appropriate Civil Court. This Court, therefore, would find no merit in this writ application and accordingly the same is hereby dismissed. Dismissal of this writ application, however, will not come in the way of the petitioner if he chooses to file a civil suit claiming his right, title and possession over the alleged land purchased by him by a registered sale deed as against Respondent no. 6 and 7. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar