IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34129 of 2008 HARIDARSHAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 11.11.2008 Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The case is under Section 366A IPC and the FIR states that one Kanahaiya Rai came to the house of the victim to convey her that Bhola Rai was waiting for the victim at the railway crossing. The lady went there and appears gone missing. A search was made and the lady is still traceless. As may appear from the facts stated the lady herself went out of the house for receiving certain articles. The contention is that the lady was keeping a liaison with one accused or the other and was free in meeting them and going out with them. The further contention is that one of the paragraphs of the case diary, i.e., 86 indicates that the lady was in love with one of the accused persons and she went traceless with him. The age of the girl admittedly was somewhere around 17 years. The further contention is that she might be at the threshold of attaining majority. Let the above named petitioner under the above facts and circumstances be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R.P.D.Dubey, Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.IVth, Begusarai in Sessions Trial No.255 of 2008(Matihani P.S.Case No.114 of 2007). B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )