1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Civil Writ Petition No.8509 of 2006 Shri Somnath Agnuram Gupta Petitioner Vs. Shri Suresh Dattatraya Patil & anr. Respondents Mr.A.A.Garge for petitioner. Ms.Gauri Godse for respondents. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. March 15, 2007. P.C. . This petition impugns the interlocutory order passed below Exhibit 5 in Civil Appeal No.46 of 2006 filed by the petitioner before the learned Addl. District Judge at Kalyan. The petitioner was heard by this Court on 21/12/2006 and this Court held that no fault could be found with the order challenged and, therefore, no interference therein was called for. . However, so as to give some more time to the petitioner to pay the amount due to be recovered, notice was issued to the respondents, returnable on 8/1/2007. Ms.Godse, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents states that during the last about two months nothing has been paid whereas Mr.Garge, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that 2 the petitioner is economically weak and, therefore, he cannot make a commitment for payment of arrears within a fixed period so as to comply with the conditional sale granted by the lower appellate Court. . The order passed on 21/12/2002 cannot be reviewed by me and, therefore, this petition which was impliedly rejected by the said order, is hereby rejected. (B.H.MARL