IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2008 / 11TH ASHADHA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 4047 of 2008() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.866/07 OF KALADY POLICE STATION PETITIONER : ACCUSED ------------------------ RAJU.A.V., 32 YEARS, S/O.A.N. VIDHYADHARAN, AMBATTU HOUSE, MANJAPRA PO., PIN-683581 BY ADV. SRI.K.ANAND RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA 2. S.I. OF POLICE, KALADY POLICE STATION BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.HEMA, J. ----------------------------------------- B.A.No.4047 of 2008 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd July, 2008 O R D E R This petition is for anticipatory bail. 2. According to prosecution, de facto complainant gave a statement to the police, based on which crime was registered under Sections 279 and 338 of Indian Penal Code. On questioning, he stated to the petitioner that actually he was assaulted by accused 1 to 3. But, because of the threat from the accused, he did not reveal the true facts before the police. Therefore, the sections were altered to Sections 326, 506 Part(I), 294(B) and 34 IPC. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that a false case is foisted against the petitioner due to political revenge. The de facto complainant was giving inconsistent version to the police. Therefore, he may be granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, it is submitted. 4. This petition is opposed. According to learned Public Prosecutor, the de facto complainant was intimidated by the petitioner and hence he could not state the correct details to the police. In case the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail, he will interfere with the investigation. I am satisfied of the submissions made and this petition is dismissed. K.HEMA, JUDGE vgs.