IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 5TH JULY 2007 / 14TH ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 1822 of 2004(P) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- DR.G. BINDU, THERUVATH, THONNAKKAL P.O., MANGALAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.JAYASURYA. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRTARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. *ADDL. RESPONDENTS 3 & 4 IMPLEADED: *3. SANTHOSHKUMAR V.S., `SABNAM', MULLOR P.O., VIZHINJAM, TRIVANDRUM. W.P.(C). NO.1822/2004: *4. SAJIKUTTY, `SAHANA', MULLOR P.O., VIZHINJAM, TRIVANDRUM. *ADDL. RESPONDENTS 3 & 4 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 05/07/2007 IN I.A. NO. 1430/2004. BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J., GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NANDAKUMAR, ADV. SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN, SC, PSC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/07/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.1822/2004: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1: COPY OF THE SELECT LIST NO.1. EXT.P.1.A: ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P.1. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C). 18348/2003-H DTD. 24/07/2003. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE ADDITIONAL NOTIICATION ON 10/12/2003. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// prv. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 1822 of 2004-P ------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of July, 2007. J U D G M E N T The petitioner was a candidate who applied for the post of Medical Officer (Homeopathy). When the short list was published, she was not included in it. A re-checking of answer papers was conducted and Ext.P3 was published, pursuant to Ext.P2 judgment of this Court. During re- checking of the answer papers of some of the candidates, it was found that there were some irregularities in the tabulation. So, the Public Service Commission ordered re-checking of all answer papers of the candidates. The result was that 14 ineligible persons were found and they were excluded and another 14 persons were included in their place. The same is evident from Ext.P3 proceedings of the Public Service Commission. The contention of the petitioner is that since certain irregularities were noticed in preparing and publishing the short list, the entire selection should be cancelled. The Public Service Commission published final rank list. The same was exhausted by advicing all the candidates included in the list. The petitioner has not impleaded anyone included in the rank list also. In view of the above position, no relief could be granted to the petitioner. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. MS