IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31879 of 2009 GODHAN MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 09/09/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a police case under Section- 394 of I.P.C. The submission is that the F.I.R. is against 4 unknown. In his re-statement the informant discloses the name of the petitioner. If he was known by name, the F.I.R. should have contained his name in absence of any identification in a T.I.P. which has not been done. Co- accused whose bail has been rejected along with the petitioner has been granted bail in Cr. Misc. No.19272/09. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Sasaram, Rohtas in Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No.798/08. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)