IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2010 / 11TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 19502 of 2010(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SIMON P.S, S/O.KURUVILLA CHUMMAR AGED 64 YEARS, RETIRED PCKL 616, CONSTABLE VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU,KOTTAYAM RESIDING AT PALLICKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, SACHIVOTHAMAPURAM,KURUCHI, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.SAJITH KUMAR V. SMT.G.R.LEKSHMI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU,KOTTAYM. 4. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A&E) KERALA O/O ACCOUNTANT GENERAL,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).19502/2010 -------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2010 JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that he joined State service as Constable in the MSP, IIIrd Battalion on 8.4.1965. According to him, by Ext.P1 order, 1st respondent deployed persons in MSP IIIrd Battalion to the North Eastern States and that the petitioner rejoined in Kerala Police Service in 1975. Subsequently Ext.P2 order was issued by the 1st respondent granting benefits and other increments reckoning the period of deployment as well. Though the petitioner retired on 31.10.2001 and the benefit of CRP Service was also reckoned in the case of several others, benefits of Ext.P2 has not been extended to the petitioner. Petitioner thereafter submitted Ext.P9 representation claiming the benefits which have already been extended to several others. Even now the representation remain unattended. It is in these circumstances, the writ petition is filed. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, on the strength of Exts.P2, P7 and P8, he is entitled to have his deployment period in the W.P.(C).19502/10 2 CRP also reckoned for the purpose of increments and other consequential benefits, there is no reason why, his claim also should not be considered consistent with the precedence. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing the respondents to deal with Exts.P9 and P10 submitted by the petitioner and pass orders thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible at any rate within three months of production of a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs