HIGH COURT OF CHHAT?!SGARH. SILASPUR SREMWAL AW’EAL NO. 3i}6 6F 1§3é AnneHam Mahe‘ter Sm Gendmm $atnam auec w yeais, R/v VA; Keyhmr f S mastur: Uisr: Buaspur WP} mow U25} -Versus— \“ §es§30ndent '“tate i.‘ V ‘ ‘ Chhaum§ i i‘xfiadhya Wadesh {new ? afil é£@§§§$xa;; Nana for the p‘. ‘ Shf‘ U K S Charade! Pawel Lawver i0, the State HON hie Mr. Justice TJ". $h3l‘m3, JU§Q€ ' . u.“ n. 0 R D E R (Q .ebruam 900%, ‘ The aapeMant has beew com/icted under Sectmn 3G7 of the RPC bv the Additional Sessions Judae Saki: In S T Na 252,8( mde mdamem dated 1-2—1 994 and sentehced mm ta undei'go Ri for ’1’ years arm 20 pay a fme of Ré.1,QOO/‘-, in defaui‘t 9f payment of fine to fwther undergo RJ. for 6 monihs. A report has been received from ihe comemed jaz’i authea‘itiee m whieh §t has been mentiemed ihai i‘ne aunpeiiani has aHeady been 1'e§eaeed from gaii on 2~1G~1§97 on Ehe accasinn of $am§hi Jayenié. Hence, ii seems that the appeai has become infmctuaus. Record and judgment of the triaW Com? perused. Affer pemsal of the recarei, prime 2‘acie it appears that there is no iriegaéi’zy aginrirmrty 5n the judgment of the trial Court. According5y, the appear as dismissed as having become infractueus. a {gg#3i§f#“*¥ W Judgg cc r m. i p T. P. ShangLL€