THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.756 of 2001 JUDGMENT: This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order dated 18.04.2001 passed by the Special Judge for Cases under Human Rights Act and I Additional Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam in H.R.S.C.No.1 of 2000. This Criminal Revision Case was admitted on 15.02.2002 and notices were ordered on 22.07.2002 to respondents 2 to 8. Thereafter, though several reminders were issued to the learned counsel for the petitioner to furnish the correct addresses of respondents 7 and 8, he failed to furnish the same. Hence, this Court, on 06.11.2009, passed an order directing the learned counsel for the petitioner to furnish the correct addresses of respondents 7 and 8 on or before 04.12.2009, failing which, the Criminal Revision Case shall stand dismissed against them, without further reference to the Court. Since the learned counsel for the petitioner failed to furnish the correct addresses of respondents 7 and 8, this Criminal Revision Case was already dismissed against the said respondents, as per the order of this Court dated 06.11.2009. Sri T.Nagarjuna Reddy, learned counsel appeared on behalf of respondents 2 and 4. Though respondents 4 to 6 were served, they have not chosen to put up any appearance. On last occasion i.e., on 19.08.2010 when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner was absent. Hence, the matter was adjourned to today. Today, the matter was called before lunch recess. As learned counsel for petitioner was absent, the matter was passed over. Again when the matter is called after lunch recess, learned counsel for petitioner is absent and there is no representation. From the above, it is clear that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not evincing any interest in the matter. Hence, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for default in respect of respondent Nos.1 and 4 to 6. ________________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA,J Date: 26.08.2010 va