CW 5280/08 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5280/08 Deoki Nandan Sharma Versus State & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 22/07/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, for petitioner Mr. J.K. Agrawal, Addl. Govt. Counsel *** Instant petition has been filed by petitioner assailing order by which he was placed under suspension vide order dated 13th May, 2008 on the premise that on a criminal complaint filed against him u/ss.323, 379 & 506 IPC, cognizance has been taken by learned trial Judge. Counsel for petitioner has informed this court that after cognizance was taken, opportunity was afforded to him and after examining record, he has been discharged by learned trial Judge vide order dated 15th July, 2008. Counsel further submits that once the very basis for placing him under suspension stands obliterated it is causing prejudice to him if he is still allowed to continue under suspension. The order placing him under suspension also discloses about cognizance taken against him in CW 5280/08 [2] Criminal Case No.1150/04 and this fact is not disputed that learned trial Judge has discharged him from the alleged offence. Certainly in view of subsequent development which has taken place of petitioner being discharged by the competent court of jurisdiction vide order dated 15th July, 2008, the order placing him under suspension does not appear to continue any further. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to make representation for revocation of the order of suspension to the competent authority within a period of three days, who is directed to pass appropriate orders in the light of discharge order [supra] within a period of two weeks thereafter. Copy of their decision be communicated to him also. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA5280CW2008 22-7.doc