IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2008 / 7TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 10317 of 2008(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- KRISHNANKUTTY, AGED 50 YRS, S/O GOPALAN NAIR, MITHILA HOUSE, (FROM KRISHNAVILASAM), KOKKOTHAMANGALAM VILLAGE, MARUTHORVATTOM P O-688545. CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMANATHAN RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KOKKOTHAMANGALAM VILLAGE, CHERTHALA-688 524, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. THE TAHASILDAR, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 688524. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLECTORTE, ALAPPUZHA 688001. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY THROUGH, THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.BENNY VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 10317 OF 2008 C ==================== Dated this the 27th day of March, 2008 J U D G M E N T In this writ petition, the complaint of the petitioner is regarding the refusal of the respondents to effect mutation of the property covered by Ext.P1 document, which is stated to have been purchased by the petitioner in 2004. Petitioner also submits that he has submitted Ext.P2 representation to the 3rd respondent and that even that representation did not evoke any response. 2. Now that the petitioner asserts his right on the basis of Ext.P1 title deed for getting the mutation effected, it is for the petitioner to approach the 2nd respondent by making an appropriate application in terms of Transfer of Registry Rules. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing that it will be open to the petitioner to apply to the 2nd respondent and if a proper application is so made by the petitioner, the 2nd respondent shall take necessary action thereon without delay. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp