IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7014 of 2011 1. KUSHAR YADAV. 2. NANKU YADAV. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 05.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. It is admitted case of the prosecution that marriage of deceased had taken place in the year 1998 but she was issueless on account of which the relation between the deceased and her husband was not sweet. It is further admitted case of the prosecution that on 06.05.2010, informant got a message that his daughter is suffering from diarrhoea and having got the aforesaid information, he went at the in-laws house of his daughter and found his daughter dead. The informant further noticed some injuries on the person of his daughter, but it is surprising enough that he did not lodge the case on the above stated date, rather he returned to his home and on next day he again came to the house of petitioners and other accused, and after that he lodged the present case. Moreover, the case has been registered under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and no specific overt act has been attributed against these petitioners who happen to be uncle and father of husband of the deceased respectively. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as the submissions of the parties, let petitioners, Kushar Yadav and Nanku Yadav, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the 2 like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 71 of 2010. Safik ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)