CRM No. M 9186 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 9186 of 2010 Date of decision: 11.10.2010 Parveen Kumar ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 38 dated 22.03.2009 under Section 364, 302, 34 of Indian penal Code (offence under Section 302 IPC added later on), registered at Police Station Dhariwal, District Gurdaspur. The only argument raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been enroped on the basis of extra judicial confession, whereas, subsequently on the basis of statement made by the complainant, recovery of a gold ring and purse of the deceased was CRM No. M 9186 of 2010 2 effected from the present petitioner. No ground for grant of regular bail is made out. Dismissed. Nothing said herein above shall have any bearing on the merit of the case. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge October 11, 2010 mohan