MC 2208/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the averments made in the application. The challenge made in the writ petition is the contractual appointment of the respondent No. 6, i.e. the present applicant. While entertaining the writ petition, no interim order was passed suspending the appointment of the applica nt. If the applicant has been serving as Assistant Teacher on contract basis pur suant to her appointment in January, 2011, I see no reason as to why she should be deprived of her salary. Accordingly, direction is issued to release the salary of the applicant as may be admissible in terms of the engagement letter and the rules holding the field. Misc. case stands disposed of.