IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 19907 of 2010 Date of decision: 15.02.2011 Baljinder Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate for Mr. K S Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition 427(2) Cr.P.C with a prayer to direct the respondents to treat the sentences passed in FIR NO. 243 dated 10.09.1989 under Section 18 of NDPS Act, Police Station Jagraon, District Ludhiana and in FIR No. 265 dated 06.04.1994 under Section 18 of NDPS Act, registered at Police Station Jagraon, District Ludhiana as concurrent keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case. It is, now, well settled proposition of law as well as the law already laid down by the Full Bench in the case of Jang Singh v. State of Punjab 2008 (1) RCR (Criminal) 323, that the jurisdiction to direct the sentences to run concurrently lies before the trial Court or in appeal or revision and not in a petition under Section 482 and Section 427 of the Code is not maintainable. Accordingly, the said relief cannot be granted to the petitioner in a petition filed under Sections 482 and 427 of the Code. Dismissed as not maintainable. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 15.02.2011 mohan