HIGH COURT 9F CHHATT3$GARH AT BILASPR U WRIT PETmON {5). Na. 136‘s oi 2009 Dr. Hem Narayan Dubey S/c Late Ayodhya Prasad Dubey, aged about 47' years " Assistant Professor; Department of Political Science Government Reva Raman M:5hra Conege Surajpur Dis%rict5urguja(c G) VERSUS ’ ~ 1 The Staha of Chhattusgarh Thrcugh tr‘e Secretary, Department of Higher Education i) K S Bhawan, Raipur (C G) 2. The CGmmissioner, Higher Education Departmem, Govt. S’cience Couege campu$, Raipur, District Raipur (C G ) 3. Prmcspa! Govemment Rem Raman Mishra Ceilege Surajpur Ei5trict Sai‘guja (" G ) WRH PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF 1HE ceNsTiTUTiON GF iND . 5g. $f’b59 5h"? 5$i5h g I‘gguuagui, 5 PEmmNER RESPQNEENTS Firesent: 5hr: A.K,Présad, Adyocate for the petitioner. Shri Pankaj Shr§vastva, Pane! LaWer fer- ihe State/fespcndenta ORAL GRQER {Passed 9n 27th day 9f March,’2009) PA Leametg caunsei appearing for the petitieher, on instructiens, eabmits that the petitioner does not went to eontest the petition on meiiis at this stage, however, prays’rthat the respondeni authorities may be fciirected to consieer- and decide his pending representations, as eXpeditiousiy as possibie. Shri Shrivastava, learned Panei Lawyer f0: ihe State/{espondents submiis that if the iepresentations dated 18.08.2007 (Annexure P/li), 19 i1 2967’(;&.nne’xure P/12) and 15 02 2908 (Annexure P/13) are pending consideration the same shali be considered and demoed by the authorities m accoreance with iaw, on its own merits, Within a period of Six weeks 'irom tociay. in View of the foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for ’ the petitioner, nothing survives for adjuoication. Accordingly, the netition stanos disposed of. rel Amit t m