IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12584 of 2006 MATHURA PRASAD YADAV, S/O LATE ASHARFI YADAV, R/O VILLAGE-MAI DARIAPUR, P.S.-MUFFASIL, DISTRICT-MUNGER. ……………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE COLLECTOR, MUNGER. 3. THE S.D.O., SADAR, MUNGER. ………RESPONDENTS. With CWJC No.12978 of 2006 MD.SAFFIQUE AHMAD, S/O LATE SHEIKH MHAMID, R/O VILLAGE-MURZAPUR BARDAH, P.O.-DARIAPUR, P.S.-MUFFASIL, DISTRICT-MUNGER. ……PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE COLLECTOR, MUNGER. 3. THE S.D.O., SADAR, MUNGER. ………RESPONDENTS. With CWJC No.13500 of 2006 ASTANAND YADAV, S/O LATE KASHI PRASAD YADAV, R/O TAUFIR KARARI TOLA, P.S.-MUFFASIL, DISTRICT-MUNGER. ………………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE COLLECTOR, MUNGER. 3. THE S.D.O., SADAR, MUNGER. ………RESPONDENTS. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr.N.K.Agrawal, Sr.Adv. For the State : SC-VI. (in CWJC No.12584 of 2006) For the Petitioner : Mr.N.K.Agrawal, Sr.Adv. and Mr.Vijay Anand, Adv. For the State : SC-VI. (in CWJC No.12978 of 2006) For the Petitioner : Mr.N.K.Agrawal, Sr.Adv. and Mr.Vijay Anand, Adv. For the State : G.A.-X.(in CWJC No.13500 of 2006) 4 14.07.2010 In all these three cases the order of cancellation of licence issued by the concerned S.D.O. is under challenge. From the impugned order, it appears that in a cyclostyled form for cancellation 2 of the licence the name and licence number of petitioner has only been filled up and order has been issued. This Court has already held in earlier cases that such cyclostyled orders showed apparently non-application of mind. Therefore, the same were quashed. Two such orders referred by learned counsel for the petitioner are of CWJC No. 12433 of 2006 (Sunil Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar & Ors.) and CWJC No. 12596 of 2006 (Gopi Chand Azad Vs. the State of Bihar & Ors.). In those cases the orders were quashed and matters was remitted back to the concerned S.D.O. for hearing of the matter afresh and to pass fresh orders in accordance with law. Following the said orders, the impugned order, as contained in Annexure-3, in the respective cases are quashed and the Sub-Divisional Officer is directed to hear the matters afresh and dispose of the same in accordance with law by speaking orders after complying with the principles of natural justice. The writ applications are disposed of accordingly. 3 It is expected that the hearing shall be concluded and the final orders shall be passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer concerned within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)