IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8261 of 2010 1. GITA KUMARI W/O SRI JAY KUMAR YADAV R/O VILL RAGHUNATHPUR, P.S.MURLIGANJ, DISTT- MADHEPURA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF BIHAR , PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR , PRIMARY EDUCATION BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION MADHEPURA 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BLOCK- MURLIGANJ, DISTT-MADHEPURA 5. THE MEMBER , DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY MADHEPURA 6. THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ RAJ RAJNI, BLOCK-MURLIGANJ, DISTT-MADHEPURA 7. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT , GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ RAJ-RAJNI, BLOCK- MURLIGANJ, DISTT-MADHEPURA 8. PRATIBHA KUMAR D/O SHIVNANDAN YADAV POSTED AS PANCHAYAT TEACHER PRIMARY SCHOOL RAJNI MALIO PANCHAYAT -RAJNI, BLOCK- MURLIGANJ, DISTT-MADHEPURA 9. KUMARI SANJANA D/O PULKIT ROY POSTED AS PANCHAYAT TEACHER PRIMARY SCHOOL, RAJNI HARIJAN, PANCHAYAT RAJNI, BLOCK-MURLIGANJ, DISTT-MADHEPURA ----------- 2 28/01/2011 There is some question mark raised with regard to the first finding that necessary documents in relation to the appointment of Panchayat teachers have been destroyed in the flood in light of annexure-12 which has been annexed by the petitioner with this writ application but that does not clinch the issue because there is nothing - 2 - to indicate that the petitioner had moved the Block Development Officer within the time frame with regard to his non-appointment or non-selection or that there was anything pending before the Block Development Officer which could be taken up for adjudication by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Madhepura. It is not open to the Appellate Authority to entertain a case as and when a person approaches with a grievance because there has to be some finality to the selection and the time frame when such issues can be re- agitated or re-looked into. With the second issue not having been proved to be erroneous, no interference is required with the impugned order. This writ application has no merit. It is dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)