IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.WP No. 2748 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 27th July, 2011. Sushma Kumari Petitioner through Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Mr. B.S.Chahal, DAG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner was appointed as an Educational Volunteer by the Village Education Development Committee of village Kotla Power House, Tehsil Anandpur Sahib, District Ropar. Her services were sought to be terminated under the orders passed by the Director General, School Education-cum-State Project Director, Sarva Shikshya Abhiyan Authority, Punjab. In their short reply/affidavit, the respondents have stated that the petitioner was directed to be relieved from the assignment of Education Volunteer as meanwhile she had been elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat. The respondents have maintained and rightly so that she can not simultaneously perform the dual duties as Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat as well as Education Volunteer. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be given an option either to continue as Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat or as an Education Volunteer. The plea taken by the petitioner appears to be fair and just. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall exercise the option to continue either as Sarpanch of the gram Panchayat or as Education Volunteer within two weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is received, failing which the respondents shall be at liberty to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law. Disposed of. Dasti. July 27, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE