i a 24, 25, 29 -40, 42-45, 47 -5 5, 57-5 [], 60, 62-68, 7 0, 7 2-85 % 13.09.2010 Prcscnt: Mr. V.t(. shailcndra for thc pctitioncrs. ctttMINAt, REVISIOFI PETI'rlolN Nos. 49712010. 498/2010. 502-51312010, 515-518/2010. 520-528/2010. 530-531/2010' ?k l. 'Ihcsc rcvision pctitions arc dircctccl against thc ordcr dated 18'hMay, 20l0 rcfgsing to takc cognizancc and surlmon the accuscd in cornplaints filcd unclcr Scction 138 of thc Ncgotiablc Instrumcnts Act, 1881 (thc Act, for short). lly thc irnpugncd order clatccl l8tl'May, 2010,lcamcd trial court has clisnissccl thc complaints, intcr alia, holding that no proof of dclivcry of nclticc urn{cr Scction l3B(b) of thcAct has bccn placcd on rccord. I,carncd c<l1rlscl lor thc potitioncr sr-rbmits that thc pctitioner had filcd postal rcccipts isstrccl by thc pclst ol'ficc lor scnding of noticcs undcr Scclion 138 proviso clausc (b) of'thc Act. IJc rclics upolt thc lividcncc Act, 1872 and the Gcncral Clauscs Aot, 1t197. IIc has also placcd rclianoc on scvcral jr-rclgrrrcrrts of thc Suprcmc Court including V Roia Kunnri versus P. Suhhuranm Naidu, (pg4Lti SCC 774 and D. Vinttd Shivttpptt versus Nandu llelliultpu, SeqO) 6 SCC 456. IIc subrnits that thc clucstion of scrvicc of noticc was not argr-rcd ernd clttcstioncd. IIc statcs that argumcnts wcrc hcard orr thc point of tcrritorial jurisdiction only. [Ic subr"nits thal in casc thc c1r-rcsticln of scrvicc of noticc had bccn raiscd by thc lctunccl trial court, lrc worllci havc rclcrrcd to ancl rclicd upon thc aforcsaid judgmcnls and Scctiun 114 of thc lividcnce Aot, 1872 and Section 27 of thc Gcncral Claruscs Act, I t197. I Ic has clrawn my altcnlion to carlicr order passcd by ,i t 533/2010, 535-541/201 0, 543/2010. 545-558/2010 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified this Court in Criminal Itcvision Pctition No. 45212010 and othcr conucctcd calscs on 30tl' August, 2010. 2. Irr vicw of thc aforcsaid position, thc impugnccl ordcr dated 18tl'May, 2010 is hcrcby sc1 asiclc and thc mattcl is rcmanded backto the lcarncdtrial ' court fcrr frcsh hcaripg arncl c{ccision. Lcarncd counsel for thc pctitioner will bc cntitlccl to rcly upoll judgmcnts and statutory provisions in support of his cclntctttion. . 3. It is clarificcl that this Courl has not cxprcsscd any opinion on merits ancl thc trial oourl witl pass an ordcr without bcing influenced by the obscrvations uraclc in this ordcr. a 4. 'l'hc pctitiorrcr will appear bcforc thc trial court ou 5tr'Octobcr,2010. 'l'hc pctitions arc accordingly disposcd of. .4 ltr 1 'l( L- SANJIV KHANNA, J. slcPl'IlMtlER 13, 2010 VKIT ft o