1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR W.P.No.4116 of 2007 (Bharatiya Yatri Kalyankari Samiti @ Bhartiya Yatri Kendra, Nagpur .vs. Union of India & Ors.) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and Mrs. Vasanti A. Naik, JJ. DATE : January 21, 2008. Heard Mr. C.S.Kaptan, Adv. for the Petitioner and Mr.M.M.Sudame, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. The petitioner in the present petition is challenging the appointment of respondent nos. 5 and 6 made on 2.10.2006 and 31.1.2007 respectively as members of the Zonal and Divisional Railways Users Consultative Committee, Central Railway, Mumbai. Counsel for the petitioner has contended that these respondents are not eligible to be considered for the said appointment in view of clause 515 of Indian Railway Code for Traffic (Commercial) Department as these respondents are holding assignments of profit connected with the Railways and therefore, could not have been appointed on the said Committee. Considered the contentions canvassed by the learned counsel. The learned counsel for the petitioner was unable to 2 point out which specific assignment was held by the respondent no.4 and 5 connected with the Railways. In absence of this vital data, it is difficult to appreciate the contentions canvassed by the counsel for the petitioner. The petition suffers from lack of merits. Hence, the same is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE ssj