ndm 1 ss.3233.93.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3233 OF 1993 Union Bank of India. ... PLAINTIFF Vs. Amrit Steels and anr. ... DEFENDANTS -------------- None for parties. -------------- CORAM : R.V. MORE, J. DATE : 26 th November, 2009. P.C. 1 The Summary Suit was placed on board on 19 th November, 2009 under the caption “for direction”. On that date, the Court has passed following orders: “In the present suit, the writ of summons were issued on 24 th January, 1994. However, it is not clear from the record, whether the writ of summons are served on the Defendants, as the Plaintiff has neither filed affidavit of service nor taken any action as contemplated under the provisions of Rule 227 of the Original Side Rules, 1980. In these circumstances, I ndm 2 ss.3233.93.sxw deem it appropriate to give last change to the Plaintiff and adjourn this matter to 26 th November, 2009. 2. The Office is directed to place this matter under the caption “Dismissal” on 26 th November, 2009” 2 Today, the suit is placed under the caption “for dismissal” under the provisions of Rule 227 of the Original Side Rules, 1980. None appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Perusal of the record of the suit reveals that the Plaintiff has not taken any steps to serve the Defendants. The Suit is therefore, dismissed under the provisions of Rule 227 of the Original Side Rules, 1980. [ R.V. MORE, J ]