C.W.P. No. 14532 of 2011 [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 14532 of 2011 Date of Decision: Aug. 10, 2011 Kamla Devi ........................................... Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and others ............... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner at the outset does not challenge the re-fixation of pay of the petitioner by giving her the benefit of Higher Responsibility increment. However, he argues that the recovery of ` 21,512/- be not made from the pay of the petitioner as it was made not on the basis of any misrepresentation or fraud. Notice of motion. On asking of the Court, Mr. Praveen Chander C.W.P. No. 14532 of 2011 [ 2 ] Goyal, Addl. A.G. Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. While relying on the judgment of this Court in Budh Ram and others v. State of Haryana and others 2009 (3) PLR 511 the writ petition is being disposed of by giving a direction to the respondents that the amount of `21,512/- recovered from the pay of the petitioner be refunded to her. However, if on verification of the facts the respondents come to the conclusion that the petitioner was guilty of misrepresentation and fraud in wrong fixation of pay, they shall be at liberty to get the order reviewed within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 10.8.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE