H1GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Appellant (Claimant) Respondents Non-applicants M.A.C.No. 468 of 2006 Jeevrakhan, S/o Late Balakram Sahu, aged about 21 years, R/o Village Amera, Post Amera, P>S. Palari, Tehsil-Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur (CG) Versus 1. Shiv Ratan Gupta, S/o B.P. Gupta, aged about 35 years, R/o House No.84, Near Sai Mandir, Sunder Nagar Raipur. Tehsil & Distt. Raipur (CG) 2. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Divisional Manager, Jail Road, Raipur, Kacheri Chowk Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) Misc. appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act. 1923. Present: Shri C.R. Sahu, counsel for the appellant. ORAL ORDER (Passedon 21.10.2008) Heard on M.C.P. No.2056/2006 for condonation of delay of 155 days in filing the appeai. (2) For the reasons mentioned in the application, M.C.P. No.2056/2006 is allowed. Delay in filing the appeal is condoned. (3) Heard on admission. (4) In this appeal for enhancement of compensation, the appellant is aggrieved by the award dated 07.04.2006 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Labour Court, Raipur (CG) (henceforth the 'Commissioner') in case No.l/B-159/WC Acy2004, whereby in an injury case, compensation of Rs.1,04,132/- hasbeen awarded. /y% '^ ^y Priya (5) It is not in dispute that medical evidence was not adduced before the Commissioner to prove that the claimant had suffered any partial disability due the accident. (6) In this view of the matter, the compensation awarded by the Commissioner cannot be faulted with. No substantial question of law is involved in this appeal, which is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. Sd/- DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge