..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1372 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1287 OF 2006 Smt.Kiran Rambahadur Tamang ...Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.J.P.Akulkar h/f. Zia ul Mustafa & M.H.Bandekar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 20th February, 2007. DATED : 20th February, 2007. DATED : 20th February, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant-orig.accused and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant has been convicted under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for three years. The applicant is now seeking bail. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicant states that the applicant was on bail during the ..(2).. trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to her. This statement is not controverted by the prosecution. The learned Advocate for the applicant further submitted that the appeal is not likely to be heard within the said period. 4. Looking to the above facts, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. 5. On the fine amount being paid, the applicant to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.25000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant shall report to V.P.Road Police Station once in a month, till disposal of her Appeal. 6. Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)