1 Crl. Misc No. M 8962 OF 2011 Kulwinder Singh vs State of Punjab 2. Crl. Misc. No. M 9187 of 2011 Yadwinder Singh Buttar vs State of Punjab 3. Crl. Misc No. M 15825 of 2011 Amanpreet Singh vs State of Punjab and others ****** Present : Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Navkiran Singh, Advocate for the petitioner in Crl. Misc No. M 8962 of 2011 Mr. Vikram Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner in Crl. Misc No. M 9187 of 2011 Mr. G.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners in Crl. Misc No. M 15825 of 2011 Mr. S.S.Chandumajra, DAG Punjab Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3 in Crl. Misc No. M 15825 of 2011. Mr. R.S.Bains, Advocate for the complainant. ******* This order shall dispose of Crl. Misc. Nos. M 8962, 9187 and 15825 of 2011, as these petitions arise from the same FIR. Crl. Misc Nos. M 8962 and 9187 of 2011 The petitioners seek grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 12, dated 7.3.2011, registered under Sections 406, 420, 120-B of the IPC, at Police Station Phase XI, Mohali. The broad-brush allegations in the FIR are that the petitioners induced the complainant to part with a huge sum of Rs.10 lacs by giving him false assurance that he would multiply the same within a short period. Crl. Misc. Nos. M 8962, 9187 and 15825 of 2011 : 2 : While hearing arguments in Crl. Misc No. M 15825 of 2011 for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondents No.2 and 3, this Court has come to the conclusion that the complainant may not be as innocent and credulous as is sought to be portrayed in the FIR because there is indication that he knew that the money was to be invested in the sale-purchase of property and it was from that transaction the profit was to be obtained. This Court is of the considered opinion that the present is not a case where custodial interrogation of the petitioners is required. Consequently, these petitions are allowed and in the event of their arrest, the petitioners shall be released on anticipatory bail by the Investigating Officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Crl. Misc No. M 15825 of 2011 This is a petition for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondents No.2 and 3. No case is made out for cancellation of anticipatory bail. Consequently, this petition is dismissed. Registry is directed to place photostat copy of this order in the connected files. ( AJAY TEWARI ) June 02, 2011. JUDGE `kk'