IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST AUGUST 2011 / 9TH BHADRA 1933 OP(C).No. 2869 of 2011(O) ------------------------------------- [CMA.NO.15/2011 OF THE IIND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, OS.NO.96/2011 OF IST ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM] .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- DR.BEENA S.THAMBI, W/O.KISHORE SADANANDAN, KUTHUMKARA, T.C. 44/615(1), NEAR U.P.SCHOOL, VALIYATHURA, VALLAKKADAVU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SRI.P.SANTHALINGAM, SENIOR ADVOCATE, ADV. SRI.S.SHARAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. LEENUZ VEERAN ALIAS VEERAN, RESIDING AT GROTO, OPP.CSI CHURCH, NEAR U.P.SCHOOL, VALIYATHURA, VALLAKKADAVU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 008. 2. HENTRY PRIYAN D'CRUZ, S/O.HERMAN D'CRUZ, TC 43/592(2), NANMA, KAMALESWARAM, MANACAUD P.O., MUTTATHARA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 125. 3. CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, OFFICE OF CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY - 695 001. R3 BY SRI. P.K. MANOJKUMAR, S.C. THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/08/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: O.P.(C).NO.2869/2011-O: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 16/03/2011 IN I.A. NO. 665/2011 IN O.S. 96/2011 OF THE 1ST ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD. 14/07/2011 IN CMA.NO.18/2011 OF THE ADDL. DISTRICT COURT-II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. THOMAS P JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------- O.P(C).No.2869 of 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this 31st day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.96 of 2011 of the Court of learned First Additional Munsiff, Thiruvananthapuram. Aggrieved by the order on I.A.No.665 of 2011 petitioner preferred appeal as C.M.A.No.15 of 2011 before learned Additional District Judge-II, Thiruvananthapuram. That appeal was dismissed. Hence this original petition. When the original petition came up for hearing, learned counsel requested that trial court may be directed to expedite proceeding untrammelled by any observation contained in the order/judgment under challenge, as early as possible. 2. It is seen that suit is of the year 2011. In the circumstance I am not inclined to issue any direction for early disposal of the case. I make it clear that it is open to the petitioner to urge her grievance before the trial court and request the trial court for early disposal of the case. Learned Munsiff shall dispose of the suit untrammelled by any observation contained in the order/judgment under challenge. This original petition is disposed of as above. (THOMAS P JOSEPH, JUDGE) Sbna/-