( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1032 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1032 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1032 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL NO.726 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.726 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.726 OF 2005 IN IN IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1763 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO.3987 OF 2003 Kondiram Ganu Salvi .. Appellant V/s Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority & Others .. Respondents Mr.R.D.Dave for the Appellant. Mr.Aniket Deshmukh i/by S.K.Legal & Associates for Respondents. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 11th January, 2008. DATE : 11th January, 2008. DATE : 11th January, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. This Appeal against the impugned order rejecting the Plaint, was admitted on 3.10.2005. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and after perusal of the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, we are inclined to grant relief in terms of prayer clause (b) & (c) of the Notice of Motion. Hence, the Notice of Motion No.1032/2006 is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c). (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)