IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 875 OF 2006 Dharmaji Ramji Paykoli ... Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondent Mr. R.K. Mendadkar for the petitioner. Mr. Niranjan Pandit, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. A.D. Shetty for respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, : F.I. REBELLO, : F.I. REBELLO, ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 18th April, 2006 : 18th April, 2006 : 18th April, 2006 P.C. . The petitioner’s services came to be terminated by order of 26th July, 2005, as the petitioner failed to produce Tribe Certificate. Petitioner’s claim has been that he belongs to Mahadeo Koli. This is second round of litigation before this Court. Further, we do not propose to stand on technicalities. It will be still open for the petitioner to obtain Tribe Certificate from the competent authority and apply to the appropriate Tribe Scrutiny Committee for validation of the Tribe Certificate. If on such application, the petitioner’s Tribe claim is validated, it will be open to the petitioner to submit the same before the employer who will then consider the same and pass appropriate ( 2 ) orders according to law. 2. With the above observations, petition stands disposed of. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]