\02\“\°¥ PETITIONER Versus RESPONDENTS 1 . WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONS Laxminafh Nefam, Sjo. Late Shri Bagla Ram; aged 48 years, worh'ng as Assistant Teacher, Primary School Katcnar, Bbck Darbha; District Middk Bastar Chham‘sgarh. Sfatf: of Chhattisgarh, through Sem‘etaiy, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipux Chhattisgarh Thia Commissioner; Department of Schedulczd Casie 65 Scheduled ’I‘ribas; Raipur Chhattisgarh The Collector, Districf Mirldle Bastar, Chhattisgarh The Assistant Commissioner; Department of Tribal Welfare D€pax1ment Jagdalpur; District Middle Bastar Chhatu'sgarh Block Education 0&061”, Tribal Dcvclopmcni:, Block Darbha; Distn'ct Middle Raster, Chhattiegarh TITUTIGN OF INDEA M Shn‘ RN. Jha &. Rahu] .Iha, Advacates for the pefjtioner. Shli AS. Kachhawaha, Govt. Advocate for the State on advance copy. GRAL ORDER (15.11.2003 W SUNIL KUMAR 3INHA J. Heard on admission. The petitioner, who is Working on the post of Assistant Teacher, has heel). fransfewed from Katenar to Radehadrenga, Learned couneel Bastar. for the petitioner argues that the petitioner himselfwas Wanting his transfer ‘Fmm Kafenar and he filed a representation hut he had prayed for ymiicnlar place place, he has heen transferierl o Radehadrenga on administrative gmlmrls. and instead of thaf “M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT EILASPUR W.P.l$! N0. 6505 0f .2007 t 2 W.?.(S) Na 6606 of 2007 011 hmng pomfedl agked from 1earnad (‘omwPl for the pemloner fhat Lvé’he‘n the permoner ls workmg at katenar He Subnnts that the pahtlonfzr 1S workmg there Since 1995. These am not the grounds for a court of law to interfere with the: traJxsfer of the: employee. ’T‘hf: transfer is an incidence 0f service. Nobmiy working on a transferame post can claim far his; posting at a particular place. Who should be poeted Where is to be seen by the employer which depends upon the adminieh’ative exigency as also public interest. Unless the ordef of transfer is shown to he vitiated by malafides, extraneous considerations or is shown to he passed against any statutory rule. or the Act, the smile cannot be interfered with by a Court of law, is the settled View of the Apex Court. Learned counsel for/the petitioner could not point. out any such ground of malatide or of extraneous consideration or that the order has been passed against any statutory rule or the Act. l do not find any reason to interfere with the order of transfer of the petitioner on this mound The petition is dismissed at *he motion stage i/tself. vatti