Civil Revision No.2915 of 1994 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 14.7.2010 (i) Civil Revision No.2915 of 1994 Sohan Lal (deceased) through LRs ......Petitioners Versus Ramo Devi ........Respondent (ii) Civil Revision No.2916 of 1994 Sohan Lal (deceased) through LRs ......Petitioners Versus Ramo Devi ........Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Shri Vijay Gopal Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri O.P. Goyal, Senior Advocate, with Shri Raman Gill, Advocate, for the respondent. HEMANT GUPTA, J (Oral). This order shall disposed of Civil Revisions No. 2915 and 2916 of 1994, preferred by the tenant arising out of the order dated 8.8.1992 passed by the Rent Controller, Ambala City. Against the said order of the Rent Controller, two appeals were filed. The learned Appellate Authority allowed the appeal filed by the landlord and dismissed the appeal filed by the tenant. Therefore, the tenant has filed two revision petitions before this Court. Civil Revision No.2915 of 1994 (O&M) [2] Learned counsel for the parties state that the parties have entered into settlement. In terms of such settlement, the legal heirs of deceased Ramo Devi have agreed to sell the property in dispute to the petitioner herein. It is further pointed out that since Bimla Devi, one of the legal heirs of Ramo Devi has also died, therefore, the process of execution of the sale deed is likely to take three months’ time. In view of the above, the present eviction proceedings on behalf of Ramo Devi are rendered infructuous. If the sale process is not completed within a period of three months, it shall be open to the legal heirs of Ramo Devi to seek revival of the present petitions. Hence, both the petitions are disposed of as having rendered infructuous. [ HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 14-07-2010 Preeti/ds