IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32123 of 2009 ROHIT KUMAR @ APPU KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 14/09/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a police case under Sections- 420, 467, 468 and 414/34 of I.P.C. The submission is that the motorcycle was not recovered from him and that he has no antecedents. Being 20 years he is in custody since 2.3.2009. The allegations are that he was apprehended on a chase fleeing on a motorcycle which contained a fictitious number when he confessed before the police that it was a stolen motorcycle in tandem with named accused Sanjeev Kumar. Considering the age of the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.30,000/- (thirty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in Beur P.S. Case No.53/09. Both the sureties must be his mother and sister respectively whose photograph and proof of residence shall be appended to the bail-bonds. The 2 court below shall verify the correctness of the same before enlarging him on bail. The petitioner shall be required to be properly represented on each date including his physical attendance on the dates that the court below shall so direct. In event of his defaulting under the either head, the court below shall be at liberty to proceed against him appropriately quite apart from the sureties concerned also. If the petitioner is found involved in any other case during the pendency of the present trial, quite apart from the fresh proceeding that may be initiated against him, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of his present bail also before the court below to be decided in accordance with law. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)