•c \^. ^ ^ ^^ ^^" INTHEHIGHCOuaE>ls3UE)IGAT"UREA1"BILASP^C.Gy MISCELLANEOUSARPEALNOte'70 2006 APPELLANTS CLAIMENTS RESPONDENTS: Npn-Applicants ^SbeFUKadirBal^h^S/saKadirBakshi, Aged aboyf32 yrsg R/E) sNagar NigafiTi Colony, Sweeper Colony,Kaipur, Distt. -^Raigyr (C.G;} VeFsus : - - ;'. ! : • ! Gokyi^aglTel @jVikas^Baghe|, S/ti Shri •laxmai-i.Baghe^R/o.KalibadiRaipur,-' • Distt. -Raipui-i(G.<3.) , • ^ paiTiesh,l<^mar.sa^cleQ^S/oSN-i -DasSachcleoR^pfCalibadiCtiowkRaipur,, ,:Ristt.-Raipurl(C.G.) •<••..,,?'. ..•' • • !:': : ^. , ^' .•BFanch: nager,.Unit^;Ii^ift;i ' I^.Xrishna!Kac83hari©l-JQis|<gRai|ijr3(C.^ Miscellaneous ADDeal ul^ii-j(s© iohffi73iMbtcir^/ehi@l^y^t98® ^ -^ Y^ HIGH COURT QF CHHATHSGARH AT BfaASPUR Misc. Appeal No. 546/2006 APPEIAANT ShemKadir Versus RBSPONDENTS Gokul Baghel aad others SB:-HON'BUB SHRI N.K. AGARWAL. J ORAL ORDER (26-4-2011) 1. The matter 1s called troice. Even then none appears for fhe appeUant. ; , 2. Shri Dashrath Gupta, Advocate, for the respdndent No, 3. 3. In the clrcumstances, thls Coiut is left with no option but to dismlss the appeal. 4. Therefore, fhe appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge