- 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS No. 536 OF 2009 IN SUIT No. 3392 OF 2008 Khatijabai Safakat Kaka ... Plaintiff Vs. Abdullabhai M. Mo-- & Ors. ... Defendants *** Ms. Mrudula Bhatia a/w /ali Zaidy, for the Plaintiff. Mr. Rashid Khan i/b Vinit Jain, for Defendant Nos. 5a-i, ii, 5c, 5d, 5a, 6a, 6b, 6c, 6d and 7. Ms. Naseem Patrawala i/b M/s. P. M. Mehta & Co. for defendant Nos. 1, 11 & 19. *** CORAM : V. M. KANADE, J. DATE : AUGUST 7, 2009. PC :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff. The plaintiff has filed this Chamber Summons seeking to amend the plaint as per the schedule of amendment, annexed to the Chamber Summons. The counsel for the defendants submits that she has no objection if the plaintiff is allowed to amend the plaint, as provided in the schedule of amendment. - 2 - 2. So far as prayer Clause (b) is concerned, the counsel for the plaintiff submits that she is not pressing this relief in this Chamber Summons, since this relief can be claimed only in a Notice of Motion. She, however, seeks liberty to file separate Notice of Motion to claim the same relief, as claimed in prayer Clause (b). The Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer Clause (a). Prayer Clause (b) is not pressed. The liberty, as prayed by the plaintiff, is granted. The Chamber Summons is allowed in above terms. 3. The amendment to be carried out within 4 weeks. [ V. M. KANADE, J.]