1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 14 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2225 OF 2009 Vitthal Ananda Tate ...Petitioner Versus B.D. Chandane & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Walimbe i/by Ms. Preeti B. Walimbe for the Petitioner Mr. K.V. Saste, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: JULY 29, 2009 P.C.:- It is submitted that on 17th June, 2009, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor made a statement, on instruction by the Investigating Officer, that the charge-sheet had been filed. In fact, on 17th June, 2009, no charge-sheet had been filed, and it was subsequently filed on 24th June, 2009. Maybe, it was because 2 of some lack of communication between the Additional Public Prosecutor and the Investigating Officer. 2. We do not find that it is a fit case for initiation of contempt proceedings. The Contempt petition is dismissed. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J.