:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 8486 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 8486 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 8486 OF 2004 Anant R. Parandkar ...Petitioner Versus Versus Versus Baburao G. Mukkawar & Ors. ...Respondents. Shri P.S.Dani, for the Petitioner. Shri Amit A. Mukhedkar, for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 19TH DECEMBER, 2005 : 19TH DECEMBER, 2005 : 19TH DECEMBER, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. Heard. The learned Counsel for the Respondents made a statement that the Review Application is pending before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Barshi arising out of the same subject matter. In view of this, at this stage, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. 2. The petitioner is at liberty to file or take appropriate steps after order on Review Application. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)