IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28062 of 2010 NAND KISHORE RAI @ FUNNU RAI, SON OF JAI LAL RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 384, 353 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that for misuse of privilege of bail for a period of eight years, the petitioner has remained in custody since 18.5.2010, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Javed Ahmad Khan, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class at Muzaffarpur, in Bochahan P.S. Case No. 91 of 1995 (Tr. No. 1990 of 2010) subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. 2 (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The trial court is directed to conclude the trial positively within a period of nine months in view of the subsequent development in the case. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)