IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2729 of 2004. APPLICATION NO.2729 of 2004. APPLICATION NO.2729 of 2004. IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL ST.NO. 13865 OF 2003. APPEAL ST.NO. 13865 OF 2003. APPEAL ST.NO. 13865 OF 2003. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 7th June, 2006. : 7th June, 2006. : 7th June, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned Advocate appearing for Respondent No.1 states that vakalatnama is filed only of Respondent No.1 and the Respondents Nos.2 to 8 are not served. The report of the Bailiff and office copy of the notice of this Court discloses that one Shankar Lingappa Bandagi has accepted the notice on behalf of Respondent No.1 and also for Respondents Nos.2 to 8. Hence it is obvious that all the Respondents are served with the notice. Delay is of 147 days. Sufficient cause is made out. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to assign appropriate date for hearing as to admission of the Appeal. Judge. Judge. Judge.