1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2881 OF 2006 Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi ... Petitioner Versus The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Susheel Mahadeshwar i/by Ranjana Todankar for Petitioner. Mr.M.S. Topkar for R. No. 1. Mr. B.K. Ashok for R. No. 2. Ms. Sonia Sunil for R. No. 3. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2006 DATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2006 DATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . It is the case of the Petitioners that Respondent No. 2 has engaged security guards whose names are listed at Exh. A. It is pointed out that Respondent No. 2 is also not registered nor the guards whose names are listed in Exh. A are exempted. . On behalf of the Respondent No. 2 it is submitted that they are not engaging guards but have taken workers on contract basis from Respondent No. 3. The workers whose names are listed in Exh. A have applied to Respondent No. 1 for registration as per letter dated 12.9.2006 . The respondent No. 2 1 to consider the application and if eligible in law to register them at any rate within eight weeks from today. . In so far as Respondent No. 2 is concerned, the Respondent No. 1 to carry out inspection and thereafter to proceed according to law. With the above observations, Petition disposed of. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)