IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2007 / 29TH ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 21828 of 2007(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- SIVARAMA.N.A., S/O.APPAYYA MANIYANI, AGED 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT NIDIYADKA, NETTANIGE VILLAGE AND POST, KASARGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH RESPONDENTS: -------------------- 1. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), KASARAGOD. 2. BELLUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.C-360, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, P.O.BELLUR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 3. THE PRESIDENT, BELLUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.C-360, P.O.BELLUR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 4. SRI.A.N.ASHOKKUMAR, ADVOCATE, BANK ROAD, KASARAGOD. 5. SRI/JAYANANDA.K., S/O. LATE MALINGA MANIYANI, RESIDING AT KULA, P.O.NETTANIGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 6. SARADA.S., W/O.MALINGA NAIK, GOVERNMENT QUARTERS, P.O.VIDYA NAGAR, KASARAGOD. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No.21828 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 20th day of July, 2007 JUDGMENT Complaint is directed against the acts of respondents 3 and 4. It is his case that selection has been undertaken by them on political and extraneous considerations. Petitioner is a member of the Board of Directors. Petitioner had approached this court and obtained Ext.P6 judgment, which had directed the Society to consider the objections while making selection. It is ignoring that selection is being done, it is his complaint. Petitioner has already moved Ext.P8 complaint purporting to be under Rule 176 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules to rescind the resolution dated 14.7.2007. 2. I heard learned counsel appearing for respondents 2 and 3 Sri.M.Saseendran. In the nature of the order I propose to pass I find it unnecessary to issue notice to respondents 4, 5 and 6. The writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P8 in accordance with law with notice to the petitioner and respondents 2 to 6 and any other affected WPC. 21828/2007. 2 party within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is open to the petitioner to seek interim order before the first respondent. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb