Crl. Misc. No. M-1147 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-1147 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.2.2011 Raj Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Ms. Minakshi Poshwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Rajan Gupta, J. (oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the FIR in the matter has been cancelled. She submits that she has instructions to withdraw the same. Learned State counsel (on the instructions from ASI Telu Ram, who is present in court) does not oppose this prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 21.2.2011 'rajpal'