IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25607 of 2009 RAKESH KUMAR SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 06/10/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under sections 341, 323 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. F.I.R. was instituted by the wife of the petitioner alleging assault on her by lathi for demand of dowry. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was married with the informant 20-22 years back and they have five grown up children, eldest being aged about 18 years. He also submits that petitioner is an advocate practicing in Varanasi courts and in fact informant continuously resides at her parental home and the dispute arose due to insistence of the petitioner upon informant to live with him at Varanasi, and due to some scuffle, informant sustained injuries. Petitioner is in custody since 3.5.2009. Considering the nature of allegation and above facts, this application is allowed. Let petitioner Rakesh Kumar Sah be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees - 2 - ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in K.Hat(Maranga) P.S.Case No.159 of 2009, with conditions as laid down in Sub-Section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh,J.)