wp2672-11.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2672 OF 2011 Tasgaonkar Industries Pvt Ltd .. Petitioner versus Sadashiv Buvasaheb Jadhav & Ors .. Respondents Mr.Haribhua Deshinge i/by Vijay Killedar for the petitioner. Mr.Sandeep Pathak i/by S.B.Deshmukh for respondent No.1. Ms.P.S.Cardozo, A.G.P for respondent No.2. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 17th JUNE 2011. P.C.: . This matter was adjourned earlier and placed for orders today. From the record it appears that the petitioner is impugning an interim order in pending R.T.S Appeal. This Court on 30th March 2011 has already made ad-interim order and the petitioner has been protected till date. The Sub-Divisional Order is yet to dispose off the appeal. Possibly, the matter did not proceed because this writ petition was pending. 2 It was argued that the petition was not maintainable and wp2672-11.doc 2 the remedy of the petitioner is to file revision. However, finding that the interim stay was not granted and appeal was kept pending, in the peculiar facts the writ petition was entertained and an ad-interim order was made. Therefore, the objection as to maintainability is over ruled. 3 In the light of the fact that the petitioner is protected by an ad-interim order, interest of justice would be served if the Sub- Divisional Officer, Phaltan, Sub-Division Phaltan is directed to dispose off the pending R.T.S Appeal No.8 of 2011 as expeditiously as possible and within a period of two months from today. The ad-interim order made by this Court will continue till the disposal of the appeal but without prejudice to the rights and contentions of both sides. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)