IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 28TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 6TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 29756 of 2010(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. AJAY THOMAS S/O.THOMAS, PALLIYAN HOUSE,KARUKUTTY PO, ANGAMALY., 2. BALAKRISHNAN P.S, S/O.SURENDRAN,DEVASWOM PARAMBIL HOUSE, CHERAI PO,683 514. 3. ANAND P, VRINDA HOUSE,ERANTHODE,VALAMBOOR PO, MALAPPURAM. 4. AMOL JOSEPH ARICKATHIL, ARICKATHIL HOUSE, CHEERANCHIRA PO, CHANGANACHERRY, KOTTAYAM-686 106. 5. ANAND JACOB, MUNDACKAL HOUSE,RIVER VIEW ROAD, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI-685584. 6. VIPIN DAS, SREEVALSAM, WEST KODUNGALLOOR PO,ALUVA-683 110. 7. NUFIA NOORUDHEEN, ATTIYATTARA HOUSE,KALADY PO, ERNAKULAM. 8. PRANAVU A.J, ARAYIL HOUSE, NEAR CMI SEMINARY, MUVATTUPUZHA-686 661. BY ADV. SMT.K.K.RAZIA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, M.G.UNIVERSITY, PRIYADERSHINI HILLS,KOTTAYAM 686 560 2. THE REGISTRAR, M.G.UNIVERSITY, PRIYADERSHINI HILLS,KOTTAYAM 686 560 BY SC SRI. T.A. SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 29756 OF 2010 (T) ===================== Dated this the 28th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. The 1st petitioner appeared in the 7th semester examination in “WEB Technologies” in Computer Science of Engineering. Petitioners 2, 3, 5 and 7 appeared in the 8th semester examination in High Performance Computing of Computer Science and Engineering. The 4th petitioner appeared in the 8th semester examination in High Performance Computing and Neural Networks. The 6th petitioner appeared in the 8th Semester B.Tech Degree Examination in VASIC Hardware Description Language in Electronics and Communications and the 8th petitioner appeared in the 8th semester B.Tech Degree Examination in the subject Biometrics in Computer Science. When the results were published, they failed in the above papers. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. WPC No. 29756/10 :2 : 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE vi