1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 281 OF 2008 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 430 OF 2008 IN MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1801 OF 1991 (DECIDED) (Honorary Secretary and another .v. Navnath Kashinath Pawar and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri F.T. Mirza, Advocate for the appellants. Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for the respondent No.1. CORAM : K.J. ROHEE AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 21ST OCTOBER, 2008 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. 2. The original respondent Nos.1 and 2 have challenged the order dated 05.03.2008 passed by the learned Single Judge where under the learned Single Judge condoned the delay in filing an application for review. 3. It seems that the initial order deciding the Writ Petition No. 1801/1991 was passed on 23.06.2004. Thereafter the respondent No.1 herein (original petitioner) moved an application for speaking to 2 minutes which was withdrawn. He again filed an application for speaking to minutes which was also withdrawn and thereafter on 07.01.2008, he filed third application for review of the order. In view of these circumstances, the learned Single Judge condoned the delay of couple of years. 4. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we are of the view that the learned Single Judge was justified in condoning the delay. We, therefore, do not find any force in the present Letters Patent Appeal. The same is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.