Civil Writ Petition No.14640 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.14640 of 2009 Date of Decision: January 15, 2010 Union of India and others .......Petitioners Versus Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh & another .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M. M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr.Banni Thomas, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.DR Sharma, Advocate. Notes: 1) To be referred to the reporters or not? 2) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- M.M.KUMAR, J. Learned counsel for the respondents has pointed out that there are discrepancies in some paras of the Original Application filed before the Central Administrative Tribunal and the one attached with the writ petition from pages 2 to 13. Learned counsel for the respondents has also pointed out that some Annexures, which were on the record of the learned Tribunal, have also not been attached along with the writ petition. Even re-joinder filed by the applicant-respondents has also not been attached along with the writ petition. Civil Writ Petition No.14640 of 2009 -2- Faced with the aforesaid elementary factual position, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action after removal of the objections and bringing on record all the relevant documents which were placed before the Tribunal. Accordingly, we accept the prayer and permit the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition with liberty as prayed for. ( M. M. KUMAR ) JUDGE ( JITENDRA CHAUHAN ) JUDGE January 15, 2010 SRM