IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.6601 of 2007 Between: Chagari Obula Reddy ..... Petitioner AND 1.The Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, GNSS Unit 3, Muddanur, Kadapa District. .....Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: None appeared Counsel for the Respondent: GP for Land Acquisition The Court made the following: Order: At the interlocutory stage, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal. This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent, in proceeding to pass an award in favour of the petitioner’s brothers and their sons in pursuance of notifications, dated 20-07- 2006 and 21-07-2006, issued under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, without considering his claim and representations, as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, the learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition representing the respondent, on instructions, submitted that pending this Writ Petition, the petitioner filed O.S.No.67 of 2007 in the Court of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Proddutur, against his brothers and their sons viz., Chagari Bala Obula Reddy and five others, for partition of the properties into five equal shares and allotting one such share to him and also for a mandatory injunction directing the respondent herein, who was defendant No.7 in the said suit, for apportionment of compensation amount into five equal shares and passing of award in favour of the petitioner. The learned Government Pleader further submitted that a memo of compromise was filed by the petitioner and the private defendants in the said suit, which was taken on file by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Proddutur; that the said suit was dismissed as not pressed in view of the said compromise memo and ; that in pursuance thereof, payments were made to the petitioner and others. The learned Government Pleader placed before the Court a set of material papers to substantiate the above submissions. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. On perusal of the material furnished to the Court, at the hearing, by the learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, this Court is satisfied that the lis, between the petitioner and his brothers and their sons, no longer exists in view of the compromise decree passed in O.S.No.67 of 2007 in the Court of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Proddutur. For the above-mentioned reasons, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the same is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.8447 of 2007, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 11h July, 2011 lur