r -'tSs HICTI COURTOF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P. (81 No. 6864 of 2007 PBTITIONER 3. Muralidhar Yadav, s/o Shri Batbhadra Prasad Yadav, aged about 50 years, Transport (Parivalian), Head Constable, r/o Boirdadar, Raigarh (C.G). Versus State of Chliattisgarh, through fhe Sectetaiy, Ministiy of Hoiue, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G) The Director General of PoUce, Chhattisgarh, Raipur(C.G). The Inspector General of PoUce, Bilaspur Raage, Bflaspur (C.G). WRITPETmOBJJNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIOS OF INDIA Appearance: Shri Maaoj MisUra, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, P.L. appears for the Stete/ respondents on advance copy. (20.11.2007) SUNILKUMARSJWHA.J, Heard. Learaed couiisel for fhe peutioner subiaits that vide order dated 03.8.2005 (Aiuiexure P-1) the petitioner who wasworkmg on the post of Head Constable was seut to transport department. Thereafter by proinotion order dt.28.7.2007 (AnTiexure P-7) he was proiuoted to fhe Post ofAssistant Sub-Inspector aad was directed to be posted at Raigarh, but fhe petitioner was not refieved aad ultiinately afber completion ofdeputatifBn period when he gave his joining in police headquaSl^rs at Raipur on 6.9.2007, by fhe impugned oider dated 10.9.2007 (Annexure P-6) he was given posting at Dantewada aad that too on fhe post of Head Constable. Leamed couiisel for the petitioner subniits that in fhis regard a representation dated 18.9.2007 (Annexiire P-8) was filed but fhe same has not been disposed of, so fai~. •Sff-tSisSi^..^.,....,,,,. T W.P. (St No. 6864 of 2007 c Having heard leamed couiisel for fhe petitioner as weU as learaed State Counsel, I am of fhe opinion that fhis petition should be disposed of with a direction to fhe coiicemed aufhorities/ respondents to dispose of fhe representation (Armexure P-8) filed by tiie petitioner on 18.9.2007 so fhat fhe Gontroversy raised by the petitioner caa be setUed for ever. Therefore, it is directjed that if so advised, the petitioner inay ffle a fi-esh copy of representation Artaexure P-8 dated 18.9.2007 alongwifh a copy of tiiis writ petition as also copy of fhis prder before fhe concemed authority withia a period of 15 days froia today aad if such representation is filed, fhe concemed auffaority shaU dispose of fhe same at the earliest keepiug in mind the groiinds raised by the petitioner ui this writ petition as also iii the representation. Looking to the facts aad circumstaiices that fhe petitioner has been directed to joiu at a lower post fhan fhe post ofAssistant Sub-Inspector aud he has not been given fhe benefit 6f proiaotion order dated 28.7.2007, it 1s further directed that fhe status quo as it obtains today in relation to the postiag aud services of fhe petitioner shaU be inamtaiued by the parties tfll fhe representation is decided. This petition staiids finally disposed of with fhe aforesaid direction/observations. ,^—— C.c. as per rucls. . , ' i' _ .__^:'w~:v:^.^ 1 Suml Kumar,Siffltia