IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.14296 of 2011 Date of Decision.08.08.2011 Nirmal Singh son of Shri Kartar Singh resident of House No.540 (6805) Dashmesh Nagar, Muktsar, Tehsil and District Muktsar (Punjab). .....Petitioner Versus Authorized Officer, State Bank of India, Branch Mini Secretariat, DC Complext, Muktsar .....Respondent Present: Mr. Hitesh Kaplish, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks for intervention at the stage when notice is issued by the respondent Bank under the provisions of SARFAESI Act. The SARFAESI Act contains redress in matters which arise under the provisions of the Act and against every decision that is taken under Section 13 or 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The petitioner will have appropriate remedy by means of an appeal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act. The petitioner's claim that he is a poor person and that he is only asking for reasonable schedule for the payment of amount, cannot be a subject of challenge before this Court. 2. The writ petition is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 08, 2011 Pankaj*