IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8634 of 2011 AMIT KUMAR @ PINTU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.03.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner, complainant and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in protest-cum-complaint in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The police after investigation submitted final form as the accusation was found false on 08.05.2007 specifically recording that the victim died due to jaundice and bleeding. Subsequently, protest petition was filed on 29.10.2007 and final form was accepted on 18.06.2008 and the order of cognizance was passed on 22.05.2010. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the complainant that it was due to miscarriage, the victim died and for that the petitioner is solely responsible whereas learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was some dispute with regard to money transaction hence, the protest petition was filed. 2 Admittedly, in initial complaint there was no accusation with regard to demand of dowry and that one element takes out the case from the purview of Section 304B of the I.P.C. Considering the fact that accusation was found false, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with protest-cum- complaint case no. 2205-C of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.Ist Class, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)