FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2962 OF 2006 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2963 OF 2006 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2964 OF 2006 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2965 OF 2006 ------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s Memoranda of Coram, orders appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ------------------------------------------------------ Mr. Nitin Trivedi i/by R. Sathyanarayanan for applicant. Mr. Y.M. Nakhawa, APP for State in Cri.Appln.No.2962/06. Ms. S.V. Gajare, APP for State in Cri.Appln.No. 2963/06. Mr. D.R. More, APP for State in Cri.Appln. No. 2964/06. Mr. S.R. Shinde, APP for State in Cri.Appln. No. 2965/06. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE,J. 20/07/2007. P.C.: . Heard the learned counsel for the applicant-company. It was proceeded against for an offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 in four separate complaints for dishonour of cheques and all these complaints came to be allowed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate. The orders of conviction and sentence so passed were challenged in four separate different appeals before the Sessions Court and the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge was pleased to dismiss these appeals. . These applications have been filed invoking the inherent powers of this court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The orders passed by the subordinate courts can be challenged by the applicant by filing Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 of Cr.P.C. and the powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. cannot be invoked in such cases. . Hence the applications are disposed as withdrawn with liberty to file Criminal Revision Applications under Section 397 of Cr.P.C. and if such applications are filed within a period of two weeks from today, the period of pendency of these applications be taken into consideration for condonation of delay, if any. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)