IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1900 of 2006 LAL BAHADUR YADAV & ANR Versus JAI GOVIND TIWARI & ORS ----------- 2. 14.5.2009 Heard. After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and after having gone through the order impugned herein what appears to me is that the plaintiff brought the facts of subsequent development by way of a construction of a Pucca house at the disputed land and also claimed the relief through amendment, I do not see any proper application of jurisdiction by the court below in allowing the amendment as facts relating to subsequent development order brought into the notice of the court, the petition is as such meritless and is dismissed. However, the petitioner shall be free to file his additional pleadings and the parties shall be free to lead their evidence on the amended part. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )