IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 20371 of 1999 Between: B.Hemamani D/o Daya Jeevandas, Occf:Applicant for M.Sc., (Bio-technology course), R/o D.No.58/1/415, N.A.D. Kotha Road, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Andhra University, Rep. by its Vice-Chancellor, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. 2 The Principal, College of Science & Technology, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. 3 Head of the Department, Bio-Technology, College of Science & Technology, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. 4 The Registrar, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. (Dismissed for default as per Court order dated 13-03-2003 as against R.4). .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to M.Sc., Bio-Technology course Admission/Counselling held on 16.9.1999 by respondents Nos.2 and 3 and pertaining to B.Hema mani, Hall Ticket No. 105037 with rank 577 of AUCET-99 whereat self financed seat into said M.Sc., Bio-Technology course was denied to the petitioner i.e., B.Hema mani and declaring the said denial and deprivation of M.Sc., self financed seat admission (Bio-technology course) to Petitioner and non- acceptance of the Service-Sponsor certificate dated 16.9.1999 of Dr. Madan Kalagara, M.D. (Vijaya Medical Centre, Vizag) as unfair, arbitrary, unjust and illegal and contrary to Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution of India and being violative of principles of natural justice and directing the respondents to give all consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. G.V.SEKHAR BABU (not present) Counsel for Respondents: MR. B.V.SUBBAIAH The Court made the following: ORDER: The matter relates to admission into M.Sc (Bio Technology) course for the year for the year 1999-2000. None appeared for petitioner nor any representation made on her behalf. Learned counsel for first respondent University submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ____________ N.V.RAMANA,J 14-6-05 TVK To 1 The Vice Chancellor,Andhra University, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. 2 The Principal, College of Science & Technology, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. 3 Head of the Department, Bio-Technology, College of Science & Technology, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. 4 The Registrar, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. 5.. 2 CD copies. Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JCS}