ii w.p. {c) NO. o2 0£ 2oo6 may THoius vs. sTjtrE OF slFRIM & ORs. :T¥:: (c) NO. o3 0£ 2oo6 s.N. ursHRA vs. sTanE4)I slKKIM & ORs. `---:-\ (c) No. o5 o£ 2oo6 asHurosH MlsRA vs. enanE or slRT" & oRs. SerialNo._lotOrder DateofOrder Order with Signature Office Note as toaction(jfany)takenonOrder 20 20.5.0 Present: Mr. A. Moulik, Sr. Advocate with Mr. N.G. Sherpa, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.. S.P. Wangdi, Advocate General with Mr. J.B. FTadhan and Mr. Karma Thinlay, Govt. Advocates for the State-Re spondents. Mr. 8. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with ' Mr. Bijay Rai, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 to 7 & 9 to 14. Mr. A.K. Upadhyaya, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Reshmita, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 16 & 18.Itisrecordedthatpromotions have been granted to the wit petitioners who had grievance. It has been granted with effect fi-om 22.5.2007 the date of the Court's earlier order. The wit petitioners now would have something even more, and they want the Court to enter into the question of their seniority involving several private parties. In our opinion this would not be just or equitable. Let the writ petitioners be happy with what they have got in pursuance of the Court's order. Steps taken by the parties so far are confimed. The wit petition is disposed of without any further or orrfufI; ; ordrf :rs. f tyf tyir (A.N. ay' CJ)(A.P.a,J)