IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTYFOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CONTEMT CASE NO : 1570 of 2009 Between: Zilla Banjara Sangam & Tudum Debba (JAC), Chapa Yarraiah Dora ..... PETITIONER(S) AND Sri Vijayanand and others. .....RESPONDENT(S) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CONTEMPT CASE NO : 1570 of 2009 ORDER : It was the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that as the petitioner’s representations, dated 19-02-2009, 01-05-2009 and 26-05-2009, are pending consideration, this Court by order dated 18-08-2009, disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider the representations and pass appropriate orders. Now, the grievance of the petitioner is that though the respondents passed an order, but rejected its representations. Hence, the petitioner moved this contempt case. 2. In my considered view, this contempt case is not maintainable. This Court never directed the respondent-authorities to pass orders in favour of the petitioner. The order that was passed by this Court was only to consider the said representations, which means, the respondent authorities may pass orders either way. In my considered view, if the petitioner has any grievance, he may have to file a separate writ petition, but not the contempt case. 3. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed. No costs. _______________ November 24, 2009 kvr