IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14987 of 2011 KAMLESH RAI @ BALI RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22.6.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that deceased received fire arm injury while he intervened the quarrel for price of butter in between the petitioner and the butter seller, shot by some one appears not probable in face of direct allegation of firing by this petitioner in the F.I.R. corroborated by several witnesses as mentioned in the order of Sessions Judge. So petitioner deserves no bail even considering his custody since 15.3.2010. Hence, prayer for bail on behalf of petitioner is rejected. However, the trial is directed to be expedited. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)