IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3850 of 2009 RAJ KUMAR SAH , s/o Sri Bishwanath Sah, r/o village- Piyayur, PS- Majharul Haq Nagar, Hasanpura, District- Siwan, At- present posted as Sub- Division Education Officer, Chapra (North) District- Saran. … Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna (Sri Anup Mukherjee) 2. The Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna (Sri Deepak Prasad). 3. The Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna (Sri Amir Subhani). 4. The Director, General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. (Sri Anand Shankar) 5. The Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission, 15, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Bailey Road, Patna ( Sri. R. J. M. Pillai). 6. The Secretary, Bihar Public Service Commission, 15, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Bailey Road, Patna (Sri Akhauri Govind Narayan). 7. The Deputy Secretary Cum Examination Controller of Bihar Public Service Commission, 15, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Bailey Road, Patna (Sri Sarat Chandra Jha). 8. The Director (Administration) Cum Deputy Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna. (Sri Anil Kumar Verma). 9. Sri Md. Aashfque Ansari, s/o- Late Hazi Mohammand Amim Ansari, r/o village- Etwa, PS- Karahagar, dist. Rohtas (Sasaram) at present posted as Sub-divisional Police Officer, Manihari, District- Katihar. …the opposite party. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Dilip Kumar Ray, Adv. For the State : AAG-1. For the BPSC : Ms. Nilu Agrawal, Adv. ---------- 6. 4.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 2 25.8.2010 a 2nd Supplementary show-cause has been filed by opposite party no. 5 containing the order, Annexure- J disposing of the representation of the petitioner by way of compliance order of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 1215/2009 in C.W.J.C. No. 5930 of 2009. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would very fairly submit that the aforesaid order of this Court has been complied. He would, however submit that as the petitioner was made to suffer on account of an incorrect decision taken by the Commission depriving the petitioner in getting Bihar Police Service despite his higher marks, to which he was entitled to and now when the Commission, pursuant to the direction of this Court, has decided to amend its recommendation, a consequential direction may be given to the State Government to act upon such modified recommendation of the Commission expeditiously. Inasmuch as the scope of the order in the writ petition dated 12.5.2009 was confined only to a direction to the Commission for reconsidering its decision and that has taken a such a long period of almost one and a half years, this Court would only make an observation that as 3 soon as the recommendation of Commission is received by the State Government immediate necessary remedial corrective action may be taken strictly in accordance with law so that the petitioner’s grievance is no longer allowed to continue to linger once again, this time for the inaction on the part of the officials of the Government and/or its officials including opposite parties 1 to 4. With the aforementioned observation, this application is finally disposed of. Kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)