IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.24734 of 2010 1. MOTI SAH Son of Late Murat Sah 2. Sukhlu Sah @ Sukhal Sah Son of Ram Govind Sah Versus STATE OF BIAHR ----------- 2/ 26.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. There is a case and counter case. The allegation is that the petitioners have assaulted the informant with Lathi. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the injury do not show that informant sustained grievous injury. In the circumstances, petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 3,000/- (Three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah in connection with Chanpatia P.S. case no. 51 of 2010, with the condition that one of the sureties should be in form of cash deposit. Further more, they will not physically absent for two consecutive dates at stretch, till three witnesses are examined Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)