IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.160 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 08.01.2010. Sukhwinder Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Ms.Jatinder Jit Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner has been prima-facie found guilty of producing forged certificate of his academic qualification though subsequently it appears that he has produced one more original certificate issued by the Punjab School Education Board. The first action of the petitioner has led to initiation of departmental enquiry against him vide the order dated 13.8.2009 passed by the Commandant, 7th Battalion, PAP, Jalandhar Cantt. The said enquiry is still pending. In these circumstances, there is no factual basis to draw an inference that the petitioner is being subjected to multiple departmental actions in respect of the same set of allegations. Suffice it to observe that it is only after conclusion of the C.W.P.No .160 of 2010 2 above-mentioned enquiry on merits, if some other charge-sheet is issued to him on the said set of allegations, then only the petitioner can raise such a plea. With the afore-stated observation, the writ petition is disposed of. 08-01-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE