HC-22 y '3'q •<iiqi<n<i, gfll'y'is. Iqwi^y ^..^.^.4.0)^ ^ IWCTI tniich I^^T' an^r^i K-tt* 3H5RI ?t)*1|Ctl <-lf?ft 311^1'FRIIW^lte til<<I<']<ill liWvK'? ft<st ifa+^K i? 3if:aH ati^r PETITIONER; Smt. Rek|ha, W/o Qcnd Lal, aged 32 yeare, R/o.ViUa^e Akhl-ar, Jaapad Paachayat Lonni, District Bpaspur (CG) Versus RESPONDENTS: State of (phhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Paacbay^t & Social Welfare Departinent, Dau Kalyan Sijllgh Bhawan, Raipur (CG) CoUectorJ Bilaspiir, District Bflaspi-ir (CGS Chief E^ecutive Qfficer, Jaapad Pancliayat Lonni, D^strict BiMspur (CG) Project QfBcer, Integrated Chfld Developnient Project, ^onai, Distnct Biiaspur (CG) Smt. Jayja, W/o Bhikhucband, aged 33 years, Caste S4.taami, R/o viilage Akhrar, Jaiipad Panchay^t Lonni, District Bflaspur (CG) (Writ Petition under Article E26 of fhe Constirution of India) &. 5-12-2008:- Shri Mirza Hafeez Baig, coi(uisel for the petitioner. Siiit. Sniita Ghai, Paael L^iwyer for ffae State/icspondents No.l and 2. The petitioner by the inst^nt petition. has prayed for quasbing of the order dated 8-8-2008 of A4riexure-P/4 passed by fhe Additioaal CoUector, Bilaspur and also th^ order dated 8-10-2008 ofAruiexure- P/ 1 passed by fhe Director Paiicjhayat with a furfher prayer to confirm fhe order of Annexure-P/2 app^inting the petitioner as Aangan Badi Vi/orker ofviUage Akhrar. :u£sasKS=af~is''a^A'ilSa'a-'^l '^-s: L^^sl -^^=1 ?-"^E /'&-HC-22 T^ -ill'tld^, yflly'is. pKll^y Sff^ XR^T .<s sn^i^i k-tt'b an^i ^*U^ ^•ll^fl IIIMIaillCh -—•---••^ ^gg '^S^St' Undisputed facts are fhat respondent No.5 & ofhers for ap| Worker of vfllage Akhrar was ^l^rf^y ITP^ff'? 'f^S}' '(f^R^R ^sipgrTsn^r the applications of the pentioner aad pointraent to the post of Aaugaa Badi 'orwarded to respondent No.4. The petitioner vvas appoiated as Aanjgan Badi worker vide order dated 26- 10-2007 of Armexure-P/2 by (sspondent No.4. Respondeat No.5 chaUenged her appointment bjr way of revision before Additional CoUector, Bilaspur. After heai^ing couasel for the parties, leanied Additionai CoBector allowed the fhe order of appointineut of ^ie petitioner aad directed the CIiief Executive Officer, Janpad Pani Irevision ofrespondent No.5, set aside •hayat, Lonni to reconsider all the appUcations obtaiaed for appoi(iunent of Aangaa Badi worker afresh and appoint the inost eUgible |candidate after close scnitm.y of the appUca.tions vide Annexztre-P/4 above order of Additional CoBe Panchayat Raj Acihuiiyaia fher. i^vision and since power of . subseauent revision is uot inain! The pctitioner's revision against the ;tor has been fui'tbcr rejected toy the Director Panchayat on fhe grjsund fhat under Section 91 of the fc is provision of one appeal aad one revision has aJready been exercised, table. Leamed counsel for tlie jpetitioner subiaits tha.t -the pefitioner wa.s appointed as Aaugaa Badi T|Vorker as per flie guideliaes dated 6-1- 2000 (Annexui-e-P/7) issiied by|the erstovhile State ofMadhya Pradesh in tliis regard. The above |guidelines clearly envisage that the candidates, who haw passed cl^ss-8th and who belong to SC, are to be ^ givea preference. Since respon^ SC.category, the petitioner w| ient No.5 was 10th pass aad belongs to as eatiUed for preference as per the [^! Sfe 'a m XI-HC-22 '3^ -<<1<IIW<<, »fl1<H<IS. ("K'll'My 3n^?r tf^cf; HWWI ffwfsfi 311^1 •W R-li.'* Stl^I ^H ^ficT "^. 200 I^ST' 311^1 TCiiw^fgg 'nnlci-fli iwrat' 4 fe€tTf3R?re ^ aiPgiT sii^i tbr fbis reason also she was entitled guideHnes for appoio.tment of Aai^gau Badi Workers7 The petitioner is ia possession of 2.05 acres of land and as such, her fainily also belougs to below poverfy line a^id| for preference. I have heard learued counsj The Additional CoUector vid il for fhe peutioner. e order ofAnnexure-P/4 lias aliowed appeal of respoadent No.5 aa.d 4et aside tb.e order of appoiiitmeiit of the petitioner witli a fiading tliat|froi3i perusal cffherecprd, it appears fhat respondent No.5 is 10th pas she belongs to SC categon' aad card, whereas fhe petitioner belcj b, her name appears ia the voter list, she is also holding below poverty tine ngs to SC: suid 8th class pass and her name appears ia the voter list, bijit she does not hold below povcrty line card. Apart from. fhis, the St^adiag Coniinittee of Swasfha Evara. Mahiia Bal Vikas vide its resolutibii No.4 dated 13-7-2007 had resolved to appoint resporident No.5 as| Aangaji Badi Worker, however, the petitioner has been appointed ifhout there beiag aay resolution for a.ppointin.ent. After hearing leamed cou^isel for the petitioner aad after goiag tfarough the impugned order (An ' rightly set aside appointment of iexure-P/4) ofthe Additienal CoUector and fiirfb.er considering guideli|nes for appointnient of Aangan Badi Worker, this Court is of the opi(iion tliat fhe Additioiial CollectoF has fhe petitioner as Aangaa Badi Worker tiy assignuig proper reason. |T'here is no infmiiity or iBegaUty or _L. jui-isdictional en-or iu fhe iinpu^ued order wana.utmg interfei^nce .in ^^^^si^^^S5'i!_. • • ' ^p??^''?^^^.^?-^'?''-'1''""""——— —.-.—...—. ^s,. p^ &1 ^j£\ ald <3|d dj •61| £.a 4 t-^ :'^3l •:°9