IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T)No.7986 of 2008. Date of decision: 27.12.2010. Kapoor Chand …..Petitioner. Vs. H.P. State Forest Corporation & anr. …. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : M/s Surinder Sharma & Paresh Sharma, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate. Kuldip Singh, Judge (Oral). The petitioner has been regularized as Office Helper vide memo dated 31.12.1997 Annexure R-1. The petitioner vide office order No. 225/2005-06 dated 5.10.2005 has been re- designated as clerk and vide same office order his date of regularization has been given as 31.12.1997, which corresponds to date of regularization mentioned in memo dated 31.12.1997 Annexure R-1. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that grievance of the petitioner in petition will be satisfied in case seniority is given to the petitioner as clerk from 31.12.1997. In view of submission made by learned counsel for petitioner and the fact that petitioner has been re-designated as clerk vide office order No. 225/2005-06 dated 5.10.2005 in which his date of regularization has Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? …2… been given as 31.12.1997, the present petition filed by the petitioner has become infructuous. However, in case the petitioner is not given seniority as clerk by the respondents w.e.f. 31.12.1997 then the petitioner shall be at liberty to agitate before appropriate forum/ court for his seniority as clerk w.e.f. 31.12.1997 in accordance with law. In view of above observations, the petition stands disposed of so also the pending application(s), if any. December 27, 2010. ( Kuldip Singh ), (Hem) Judge.