IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 80 of 2006 (S/B) Ambrish Kumar. .……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. .………. Respondents. Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent Nos. 3 & 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous, on account of the fact, that the petitioner has since been appointed to the post of Prosecuting Officer. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 15.06.2010 15.06.2010 G