IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 7088 of 2008. Decided on: 06.08.2010. ________________________________________________________________ Hari Ram & others … Petitioners. Versus H.P. Agro Industries Corp. & another … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : Mr. K.C. Sankhyan, Advocate vice Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. S.C. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondent No. 2. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): The limited case of the petitioner is that though he has been considered for regularization, but his regularization has not been considered strictly as per Annexure P-C, dated 11th July, 1995, even though the vacancies were also available. 2. Consequently, the respondents are directed to re-consider the case of the petitioner, strictly as per Annexure-PC, dated 11th July, 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 1995 and also by taking into consideration that 19 vacancies were available as per pleadings of the parties, within a period of ten weeks after the production of certified copy of this judgment. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. August 06, 2010. (sck/k.attri).