IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38175 of 2009 VIKAS KUMAR SINGH ----- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. KAJAL SINGH ---- OPP. PARTIES. ----------- 04. 10.02.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner and complainant are present. On the earlier occasion, it was submitted that the parties have now entered into a compromise. Accordingly they were directed to file affidavits. Today an affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner enclosing therewith the compromise application. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that in fact, both the parties have compromised, and affidavit in this regard could not be filed on behalf of the complainant. She, however, does not dispute the statement made in the supplementary counter affidavit filed today. In that view of the matter, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the SDJM, Sasaram (Rohtas) in connection with Complaint case No. 1471 of 2008/ Tr. No. 2654 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)