IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44450 of 2010 TUSAN BIND S/O SARJUG BIND Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 15.3.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence u/s.392 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the nature of allegations against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s prayer for bail shall not be considered if his case was bifurcated for purposes of framing of charge. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )