^:"'"^ "^. ^^^.^^^ ^ ^ ^ES^S^ IC—78 AO' lO^ an^i wi [ii-ii+ WT 311^1 s»i>< :i;i~ wwii fl»*ir<t> '3^'<ll'lliy<<, ssiial'y'is, [c|<?ii'M'j,< R.-^^).^o-^^^200^ 3n^TT3R? (Ijcli^^) WIIW ^ltel 311^1 PBTITIONERS; RESPONDENTS: *i<il<'fi1'< im?if 4 Is^t <l^i»;i< i?afRn sil^i Paacliam. Kusaar Siagh, S/o Late Aaaat Kumar Siu.gh, aged atooiit 27 vears, ViUage Babu Farsabaliar, Post Anldra, Tahsfl Farsabaliar, District Jashpur (CG) Babulal . Patel, S/o Madbu Madhu Sudan, aged about 35 years, ViUage Ankira, Post ^uikira, Tahsil F'ai-sabaliar, District Jashpur (CG) ^. Lolas Lakra, S/o Ishwar Lakhi'a, aged about 37 years, Viilage Golidili, Post Ankira, TaL.sU Farsabahar, District Jashplir (CG) 1. 2. 3. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Departiiient of Rural, Maiitralay, D.K.S. Bhavaa, Raipur (CG) The Secretarv, Deuartinent of School Education, Bhavaa, Raipur (CG) D.K.s. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Farsabahar, District Jashpur ^CG^ ! ZUa Shiksha Kendra.. Rajiv \ i Gaxtdhi Shiksha Mission, i | Jashpur (CG) ^ : ^ | ''^..s^ / '"'i>t«&&—78 sn^i 'vt f4-ii<* wii an^i siiim "'^ & ~S!s( ^W\v\^, vi-^ww, hv\wy w*ifn a>*ii<*> •W^200 311^1 •q^T (^pfg^T) l^nw ^itei sn^i •^ f'Writ Petition under Artj Sbri Sorakant Venna, Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Q respondents No.l and2. Heard. The petitioaers have pr| the respondents to conside) cancellation of fheir termiua^ from. the services of Giiruj^ followiag due process of law; Learaed counsel for pressing fhis petition at this ^ fresh representations agains representa.tions are filed, the law laid do\vn by this Court ir| The State of Chhattisgai'h &| 2006. Leamed counsel for thd disoosed ofwith fhe aforesaidl In view of fhe subinisl parties, tlie iastaat petition is| to inake detailed representl raisiiig all their grievances. c^urisel for fhe petitioners. )eputi- Govt. Advocate for the State/ Wl cbl'4^41'11^W?ff'^ fe^ <f^'^l< ^siRnsii^r •le 226 of the Constitution of India) ^ferred fhis writ petition for a direction to representations of fhe petitioDers for lion order, as tliey have beea term.iaatecl on 1-11-2000 (A.oaexure-P/35 without f|ie petitioners sitbm.itted that he is not |tage. However, he prays for libeffa' to file [t. tlieir grievaiices aiid in ca.se, siich Isaxae m.av be decided in. accordance with W.P. No.3441/2003 (Ram BUas Singh V. others) vide order dated 13th .Jartua",", State has no objection if tlie petition is Idirection. feions inade bv leanied couusel for the Idisposed ofwith Uberty to fhe petitioners fctions before the concemed aufhority 1hich are rajsed jn.:this oejition wifbto...a, aii^i ^i^?m? •tfi'n SII^T gnw ,rve -ysi •a||*llcl'>), :tj'Tt1y<l'», fa<'ii'M3'<. iimc^i a>*ii<w giI^T-iraqT ('jqi^q^) ^cTOR^toan^i 3 qiRfepfr^ iimfr •? fest •?fw?R irsifinsn^i period'of 15 days from today. On such representations being made by the pe&tioaers, tlie same shtdl be considered aad decided bv tlie conceraed authority with.m a f(irfher period of 6 weeks .in tenns of t:ie oKler passed in rhe matter ofR|3m BUas Sm.gh (Supra).