^8^?'^?? [p^''°^s /oPNw•^'s; HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISCiARHAT BILASPUR PETmONER : S.R. Rattua, aged about 54 years, son of late Shri Salik Ram fedlua, readent of^illage-Tum^ Tah. Da^^ District JaajgirChampa (CIihattisgarh). VERSUS • . RESPONDENTS : 1. Ghhattisgarii Rajya Van Vikas Nigam, tinougb Ghamnan, Sector V, Kok^i Naza, Shankar Nagar Road, Raqmr (CMiattisg.Euli). 2. Chauman, Chhattisgarii Rajya Van Vikas, Swtor V, Lttes Plaza, SKariuu- Na^u- Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarii) CWRTE PETTTEON UNDERARTICLE226 OFTHE CONSTTTUnON OF DstDIA) (SBiHftHi'MeAfc.SafflsliK.Asuhofei.J.) Present : Shri P.8. Kffldiy, Advocate forlfae petittona-. Shri Vivek Ranjari Tiwari, Advocate for the respMMlettts. QiRALOiRDER (Passed^2'S^<>fJannary,20(>8) . 1. Tlie petiticn^6ejn&^^^raevedtyfc dated 08.02.M07 (Annexure P/7), filedtiuSpetitKtocm^^wut^^^t^ transfar ordCT, the petitioner has beai traflsferred from a pl^se, where tfae .petitioner was n<*woricn% to a new place. 2. This Court, havii% beensatisfied, gfmtd statm quo with^r^ placenMtitoftfafipetitionM-as<®2l.02.2007. 3. ' By virtueofintCTim onter datd 21.02.2007, the petitioner is e<MBtuniing cwn die same place for about 11 montfas. At flus stage, it is not necessary to go into lliemeritofdifi case. Howevw, in view^ofthe &cfthattfae petffioner has already been •woikw^ at the same place Ssr about 1 1 monflis, it is e^qiedient and desirabl^ m the intereA ofjustice, tfaat^^ respondeuts may eonsider the placement of tfie petitionw, keeping in view 6f public iirterest aad adnumstrative exigency, if s6 advised, without fflsisting on the compliance oftfae inyugned transfer OrdCT dated 08.02.2007. Leara«i eounsel aj^eMTng for flie resp<Midetits has no opposition to this. 4. Inviewoftheforeg0mg,.tfaepetitionisdisposedof. No(M-derasto co^s. Ssba Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge