IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATA1QL Ar BANGALO1 I.” Dated this the 26th day of Nay 1998 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTIcE CHANDILASHBKARAIAH WRIT PRTITION NO. 2766/i991 B.veen: 1. Sri N. Jarayanap, aged abOut 49 years, son of Marappa. 2. N. )haniyappe, aged about 36 y an, son of rsppa. . Sri N. 8 ajanna, a 8 ed about 36 years, son of Marappa, All are residing at No.85, Idaohanahalli V iilage, Ut tarahalli Hobli, Bangalore South Ta Ink. • .Ietition.rs (Sri G Papi Reddy, Advooase) AM: 1. The Special Land Acquisition Orfioea, Bangs lore Dev-.lopment Authority, B 9 ngalore. 2. The Dharmadashi, Sri Kumsaswami Temple, Mount Joy, Enu.antbanar, Bangalere. 9. e2e 5. The Huzarai Asn., Razni Wosfl, Corporation Area, 0 ngalor.. 4. The Commissioner, Charity Endoemints, Bangalore, 5 The Tahsi].dar Bangalocs South Ta]ijk, Bengalo 4 e. . .E.spondents (Sri K. Sridhar & N.S.Srinivasan, Advocates for 1.1. Sri K. Nagaraja, HCGP for 11.1, R•4 aM R.) Writ petit ion is filed under Articles 226 aid t27 of the Constition of India paying to quash the order da;d 9.4.1991 vide AnnexureS and prevent the respcndenbs 2 to 4 from claiming or receiving the amount of compensation deposited in Execution No.11j8/19O pending bezore the Court of IX Mdl. “ity ivil Judge, Bangelore. This petition coming up for preliminary hearing in B group today, tin Cart mdc the fellowing: -a The petitiorars claim to be the ownes of , acres each having registered as occupants under the provisions of the Karnatt Eeligious and Chaitab]je mar Abolition Act. The said lanas wre acquiaed by the 6 tate Governmnt for a public purpose • T hereafter the Land Acqtis it ien Officer posseS an award detemining the arket value. The Dbarmadasshi of the temple claiming betf oner fU 1 d aC I 1i ction for nference to the tjyjj Court under otion I a he 9 nd no is or ot jv ot sstisfed with tne rnket v3lue, It ap;a 5 on the said refeience the 0 vii Jud V t ianc° ie sket nuc, u qu tij, tie ptitiontrs filed applications bore the c al Dewt Commissione for reetermi rbiOfl of the compensatiOn urder ection 2e of the Lc.rjd cquition Act The said sppiicntions we e jec ed a r t m in r e h Mi g t in repect of tflc very land Civil Judge has C hrr ed pe .mr et v ‘we on efe nce, I is ndoise 2 t is called in question b the petition in this writ peition, cti 2 C t. 5 dfl tic ‘kc has no applica ion since in resreo of the very a rev ers h e y t Vvil jud on reerence if tne —PmLtcdrshi or a Commissioner of £teligirus and Chrtble f dow nt ha received Ui am it c ape at n even though they have no racht to do sç on tsr cc t fo t & i r fale iv ant for recovery of the 51G amount from them, But they cannot maintain a sepe ate application for reetermination under section 2o of the Land Acquisition Acts The ieanea Government Advocate submisted that tnd ‘V petit ndrs hp 4 ve already filed a civil suit before the Civil Juage, Banga.lore a8 indigent persons. if that is so, no relief can be granted to the peti tioars in this rit petitione j. in tbe result I pass the following order: Writ petition is rejected. However, liberty is reserved to the petitiorrs to work out their rights in the civil suit, sd/ 77 Tflfl JUiJcz n inrrr Q UI eoui’