IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17426 of 2010 ASHISH KUMAR @ CHINTU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 09.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail in connection with a case registered under Section 364 of the I.P.C. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner’s involvement has only been raised on the fact that he was being last seen with victim. Learned counsel for the State, however, submits that it was the petitioner who took the victim with him and after that he never returned. The criminal antecedent report at Flag- “A” suggests that the petitioner has two other cases. In view of the fact that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is allegation against the petitioner of taking the victim, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The bail petition of the petitioner is rejected. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)