:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.8 OF 2008 Ramchandra Vishnu Ingavale. ..Appellant. Vs. Mohan Lakhu Dabhade and ors. ..Respondents. Mr.P.G.Karande for the Appellant. Mr. Pradeep Shingate for the Respondents. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 28th April,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is the second appeal filed by the original plaintiff impugning judgments and decrees passed by the two lower courts rejecting his suit. On perusal of the plaint, it appears that the suit was not for declaration of title but only for mandatory injunction against the defendants in respect of erection of construction and for mandatory injunction for putting down the existing construction. The suit was instituted in respect of Gat No.221 in respect of land admeasuring 1-Hector and 62 R. Both the courts have held that the revenue record indicates that small portion of the land admeasuring about 11-Gunthas stood in the name of the defendants from the time of the plaintiff’s father. The reference has been made to an admission made by the plaintiff that the defendants 1 and 2 have constructed their house 25 to 30 years ago. The said house has been granted electric connection. :2: The defendants’ case was that they were gifted the disputed land by the father of the plaintiff and since last several years they are residing there. Since the plaintiff has not sought any relief of declaration and he has restricted his claim merely seeking injunction, both the courts after giving categorical and concurrent finding held that there is also no proper description about the nature of the property and suit was dismissed. In this background, there was no substantial question of law in the appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed. (R. S. MOHITE, J.)