-1- Civil Revision No.1665 of 2011 (O&M). IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Date of Decision: March 10, 2011. Civil Revision No.1665 of 2011 (O&M). Rajneesh Gupta ... Petitioner VERSUS Mohinder Kumar Gupta and another ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL. 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. B.S. Walia, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- MOHINDER PAL, J. The petitioner-defendant No.1 is aggrieved against the order dated 17.2.2011 passed by the trial Court whereby the cross-examination of plaintiff-respondent No.1 Mohinder Kumar Gupta (P.W.1) was ordered to be treated as nil. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and -2- Civil Revision No.1665 of 2011 (O&M). keeping in view the interests of justice, instead of issuing notice of this petition to the plaintiff-respondent No.1, I deem it expedient to dispose it of by ordering the trial Court to allow the petitioner-defendant No.1 to cross-examine plaintiff- respondent No.1 Mohinder Kumar Gupta (P.W.1), as prayed for, subject to his depositing costs of Rs.10,000/- before it (trial Court). Ordered accordingly. In case the costs are paid, the same shall be got deposited by the trial Court with the State Legal Services Authority, Punjab. Resultantly, the impugned order is set aside and this petition is allowed to the extent indicated above. ( MOHINDER PAL ) March 10, 2011. JUDGE ak