IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 13000 of 2004 Between: Ganugla Laxman S/o Peeraiah H.No.3-1-127, Tattikoti Street, Bodhan , Nizamabad District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector Nizamabad district 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bodhan, Nizamabad District 3 TheMandal Revenue Officer Bodhan, Nizamabad District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particulalry one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus bydeclaring the impugned notice in proceedings No.A2/5195/03-2, dt. 21/07/2004 issued by the 3rd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and unconstiutitonal and consequently set aside the same Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.VIJAYSEN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Mr. Venkata Mayur, learned counsel representing Sri B. Vijayasen Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as ‘infructuous’. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 21-04-2008 Pvks/*