IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.3839 of 2010 SANJAY MAHTO, son of Ramdeo Mahto Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 11.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 328, 379, 307 and 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that there is complicity of the petitioner in committing the present occurrence of drugging the informant and stealing his articles, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is rejected. It appears from the impugned order that charges have already been framed in the case. So, the trial court will make all endeavour to conclude the trial within the reasonable time. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)