T -HC-22 TS? ^ii<<id'!<, yTfl+i'iti. I»i<niti>i< 3TI^T ^f^K «fTWtTa»WcS "tPI. 200 t'l'btiff' an^i^r Pi-iJ!* 3D^?r ^*ff^ 'ftf^fl sn^i'roiiw^ife HIGH COUICTOr <;HHATF»GARHAT BILASPUR WRIT PETItION (C) N0. 3022/2008 WRIT PBTJTION UNDBR ARTI<;LE 226 OF THB COTfOTITUTIOTf OT'JNDJA PETITIONER RE8PONDEMT8 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7, Rcjad, Consetvator Departjtn.ent, Divisidnal Divisiot Range District Depuy Abiiyatanya, Chatufbhuj Van OR counbel Dhireadra Mishra, «J. Mr. S.K. Dadsena, Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Dy. Heard. This petition is dirccted 28.5.2008, whereby the peti +l'j<[cl'fl") iwit' fl fe^t <ra|t<lt 'ifr 3lNq •311^1 Smt. |Shashi Bai Pradhan, W/o Kailash Pradh^ii, aged about 61 yeara, R/o Van Oram Gabau{l, Post Office Bar Mawapara, Taiisii Kasdo^, P.S, Kasdol, District Raipiir Versys State ()f Chhattisgarh, fhrough: the Secretaiy, Forcstpcpartmcnt, D.K.S. Bbavan, Raipur(CG) Chief (ponservator of Forest, Forest Departmeat, Jail Rcjad, Raipiir (CG) of t-'orest, Kaipur Circle, Forest Departjment, Raipur (CG) Forest Officer, Rcgular Forest (a, Raipur, Distnct Raipur (CG) Officer, Bar Nawapara, Abhyaranya, Raipur (CG) Range Officer, Bar Nawapara Abiiyatanya, Uistrict Kaipur (Cti) Chatufbhuj Pradhaa, S/oSitaram Pradhan, R/o G.j-am. Gabaud, Distiict Raipur (CG) AL ORDER 19-06-2008 for the petitfoner. ABvocate General for the State. against the notfce ofAunexure P-1, dated tioner has been directed to vacate fhe A ' •" 311^1 ^iT (<•<!+ sw^v ?ti^ ^ff?tT s F •s^l •^ipn^T, •g^T'TS. (qcii'yy SIT^T XR^ HWWI y,^,^-------------'^ 200 fa*<{ff' STI^I ^arar ^fCT ^ -\ furthcr subinits fhat fhis petiti| ^T<4feT4^ ^TR^f'^Ts^l <T^I-t^R ^TSii^an^i disputed ]aad and haad ov^r fhe possession to one Chaturbhuj Pradhan.. Leamed counsel for th^ petitioner fairly submits that he has already uapugned the afoi^said direction before the competent authority i.e, Chief Conseryato^ of Forest and his appeal is pending. He >n niay be disposed ofwitha direction to the appeUate authority to dis^ose of the appeal wifhin the specified period. Mr. N.K. Agrawal, leame(jl Dy. Adv. Gcneral has no objection ifthe instant petition is disposed of^ith fhe direction as prayedfor. In view of the submissictns of tearaed coiinsel for the respective parties, this petition is dispo^ed of wifh a direction to the appcllate authority, the Chief Conservator of Forest/respoadent No.2 to decide tfae appeal of the petitioner eijpeditiousty preferabfy within a period of 3 inonths froni the date ofrece^pt/production ofcopy ofthis order. __..__.__A_— Sd/-' .-.-1: Dhirendra Mishra Judge —Bl' ['qt^^fe^