BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twelfth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.10865 of 2011 C. MURUGESAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.2 Vs HE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, CRIME NO.4/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. N.SATHISH BABU Advocate For Respondent : K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/accused NO.2 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 467, 468 and 471 of IPC in Crime No.4 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was already enlarged on anticipatory bail on 22.07.2011 and while he appeared before the court and produced sureties the sureties have not been accepted by the learned Judicial Magistrate NO.I, Dindigul and hence he come forward with this application and he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor, 4. Considering the fact that the petitioner was already enlarged on anticipatory bail, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate NO.I Dindigul and executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petiitoner shall report before the court concerned daily at 10.30 am., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which the anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 12/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ TO 1. THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, DINDIGUL 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. N.SATHISH BABU Advocate SR.No.31268 GH : 15.09.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10865 of 2011 Date :12/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/