THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO C.R.P.No.2516 of 1996 ORDER: On 23-09-2011, this Court granted two weeks’ time for payment of batta for the respondent No.15 and also to bring legal representatives of the respondent Nos.4, 6, 8, 12 and 13 on record. It directed that in default, Revision Petition stands dismissed as against the respondent Nos.4, 6, 8, 12, 13 and 15 without reference to the Court. 2. In spite of the above order, no steps as directed by this Court were taken by the petitioner till date. Therefore the Revision Petition stood dismissed against the respondent Nos.4, 6, 8, 12, 13 and 15. Since these persons are also parties in L.R.A. No.5 of 1988 before the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal, Anantapur and the order passed in the said L.R.A. is impugned herein, in view of the dismissal of the appeal against respondent Nos.4, 6, 8, 12, 13 and 15, it is not possible for this Court to grant any relief to the petitioner in the Revision Petition. Doing so would amount to passing an order inconsistent with the dismissal of the Revision Petition and the confirmation of the order in the L.R.A. as against the above respondents. 3. In this view of the matter, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. 4. As a sequel, all the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO Date : 13-12-2013 kvr