IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) No. 1252 of 2008 Date of decision: 25.5.2009. Bhagu Devi … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K.Ahuja, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate. For the respondents 1 to 3: Mr. R.K.Bawa, Advocate General and Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Deputy Advocate General. For the respondent No.4: Mr. G.R.Palsra, Advocate. Per Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) This petition is directed against the order dated 6.6.2008 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Banjar to Bilaspur. The petitioner challenged her transfer on two grounds, firstly that she had only spent two years at Banjar and had not completed her normal tenure of three years. The second ground was that the transfer had been ordered to accommodate the respondent No.4, who prior to the petitioner being transferred to Banjar had already completed three years at Banjar and thereafter she (respondent No.4) was transferred to Bilaspur and after two years she again managed her transfer back to Banjar. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes. 2 Keeping in view the fact that the petitioner had obtained the stay order on 11.6.2008 and by now has completed almost three years at Bilaspur, we dismiss the writ petition. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to make representation to the Principal Secretary (Rural Development) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh against the repeated adjustment of the respondent No.4 at Banjar. In case, such representation is made the same shall be decided within four weeks of its receipt. Stay order is vacated. ( Deepak Gupta ), J. May 25, 2009 ( V.K Ahuja ), J. ™