IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 7958 of 2008 Between: 1 M.V.Ramanachary S/o.Gananna R/o.Patnam(V) Kadiri(M) Anantapur Dist 2 M.S.Lokanadhachary S/o.Gananna R/o.Patnam(V) Kadiri(M) Anantapur Dist 3 M.A Kurmachary S/o.Gananna R/o.Patnam(V) Kadiri(M) Anantapur Dist ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State Of A.P Rep.by its Dist Collector Anantapur Dist 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Penukonda Anantapur Dist 3 The Tahasildar Kadiri Rural (M) Anantapur Dist .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ,order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in dispossessing the petitioner from the land in an extent 0.23 cents in Sy.No.231 of Pendlimarri(V) Pendlmarri(M) kadapa Dist without following due process of law as illegal arbitary adn unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents herein not to dispossess the petitioner fromn the land in an extent of 0.23 cents in Sy.No.231 of Pendlimari(V) Pendlimari(M) Kadapa Dist and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.J.VIJAYALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 7958 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in dispossessing the petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac.0.23 cents in Survey No. 231, Pendlimarri village, Pendlimarri mandal, Kadapa district without following the due process of law as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner claims that he has purchased land admeasuring Ac.2.90 cents, Patnam village, Kadiri taluk in the year 1965 and since then he is in peaceful possession and cultivating the same. One Smt M lakshmikanthamma, has undertaken construction of breached kunta in survey No.44, Patnam village and since such construction would cause damage to his crop, he has complained to the District Revenue Officer. Questioning the interference of the petitioner, said Lakshmikanthamma filed a suit in O S No. 214 of 1980 on the file of Subordinate Court, Penukonda and the same was compromised by orders dated 28.1.1981. Now the grievance of the petitioner is that the compromise entered into between the parties in O.S No. 214 of 1980 was not implemented and petitioner suffered financial loss and though he made several representations including the representation dated 19.3.2008, no action is taken in the matter. Hence, the present writ petition. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of directing the first respondent-District Collector to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 19.3.2008 and pass appropriate orders expeditiously, for which learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, expressed no objection. Since the representation of the petitioner dated 19.3.2008 is pending before the first respondent and in view of the agreed stand taken by both the counsel, without going into the merits of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 19.3.2008 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA,J DATE: 11.4.2008 TVK ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 7958 of 2008 DATE: 11.4.08