1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2534 OF 2009 Ketan K. Tirodkar .. Petitioner Vs. Registrar General of Bombay High Court and Anr. .. Respondents Ketan K. Tirodkar, petitioner present in person Mr.D.A.Nalawade with Mr.A.S. Gadkari for respondent no.2 CORAM : J. N. PATEL & A.A. SAYED, JJ DATE : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C. : 1. Not on board. Mentioned. 2. The petitioner has approached this court by invoking its extraordinary Jurisdiction with a prayer that the Central Bureau of Investigation via Anti-corruption Wing of Mumbai, Tanna House, be allowed to record statement of the learned Judge of this court in connection with F.I.R. A0032 dated 14.08.2006 which is annexed as Exhibit A and for further ‘ ’ ancillary reliefs. 2 3. Mr.Nalawade, the learned counsel appearing for Central Bureau of Investigation after seeking instructions from Mr.K.Babu Dy.S.P / CBI / ACB, Mumbai makes a statement that the Central Bureau of Investigation has already filed charge sheet in the matter and they do not wish to record statement of the concerned Judge. 4. The statement made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Central Bureau of Investigation clearly shows that the C.B.I. is not interested in recording the statement of the learned Judge of this court and, therefore, there is no question of granting relief in terms of prayer clause (a) of the petition. 5. Petition therefore, stands dismissed. ( J. N. Patel, J) (A.A. Sayed, J)