THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No :24781 of 2007 DATED:22-11-2007 BETWEEN: K.Ramulu. ..... PETITIONER AND The District Collector, Lakdi-ka-pool, Hyderabad & 2 others. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not mutating petitioner’s name in the revenue records and not issuing pattadar pass book and title deed in respect of agricultural lands to an extent of Ac.3.15 guntas in Sy.No.525 and Ac.5.18 guntas in Sy.No.550 situated at Yelgondagudem, H/o Shabad village and mandal, Rangareddy District, as illegal, and arbitrary. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that his late father-Agamaiah was the owner and possessor of agricultural land of an extent of Ac.3.15 guntas in Sy.No.525 and Ac.10.24 guntas in Sy.No.550 situated at Yelgondagudem village, h/o Shabad village and mandal, Rangareddy District and out of the said land an extent of Ac.5.06 guntas in Sy.No.550 was sold to one Balaiah and the remaining land of an extent of Ac.3.15 guntas in Sy.No.525 and Rs.5.80 guntas in Sy.No.550 was succeeded by the petitioner after the death of his father. It is stated that the petitions filed during the life time of his father by his cousins were settled in favour of the petitioner and suits filed against the petitioner were also dismissed and there are no disputes in respect of the said property. Therefore, it is stated that there cannot be any objection to consider and dispose of the representations filed by the petitioner before the 3rd respondent- Tahsildar-Mandal Revenue Officer, Shabad village and mandal on 19-07-2005 and 23-09-2005. As the previous representations filed by the petitioner before the 3rd respondent on 19-07-2005 and 23-09-2005 were not disposed of petitioner filed another representation before the 2nd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevelle on 05-03-2007 for grant of pattadar pass book and title deed. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, 3rd respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 19-07-2005 and 23-09-2005 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. 5. Accordingly, Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J 22nd November, 2007. Tsy