IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 8TH JUNE 2009 / 18TH JYAISHTA 1931 RP.No. 501 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.34593/2008 Dated 26/11/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ----------------------------------- DHANAVAN, S/O. RAJAPPAN, PARAMBATHERIL HOUSE, KEDAMANGALAM DESOM, PARAVUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.M.C.GOPI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. K.KANTHASWAMY, S/O. KALIYAPPAN GOUNDER, KOZHIPATHY VILLAGE, VANNAMADA P.O., CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. ATHE LAND BOARD CHITTUR, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 3. APPUSWAMY GOUNDER, S/O. SUBBAYYA GOUNDER, MOONGAMADA KALAM, KOZHIPATHY VILLAGE CHITTUR TALUK. 4. JANAKI AMMAL, MOONGAMADA KALAM, KOZHIPATHY VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK. BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.ANTONY MUKKATH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ----------------------------- R.P No.501 of 2009 ------------------------------ Dated this the 8th day of June, 2009. O R D E R Heard Sri.M.C.Gopi, the learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner, Sri.P.R.Venkatesh, the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent and Sri.Antony Mukkath, the learned Government Pleader appearing for the second respondent. On going through the review petition and after hearing the submissions made at the Bar, I feel that the grievance of the review petitioner can be redressed by directing that the Taluk Land Board, Chittur shall hear the review petitioner also while passing orders as directed by this Court in the judgment delivered on 26.11.2008 in W.P.(C) No.34593 of 2008. It will open to the review petitioner to raise all his contentions before the Taluk Land Board, Chittur. The review petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- P.N.RAVINDRAN JUDGE //True Copy// PA to Judge ab 2