IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2368 of 2007 SUDHIR KUMAR SHRIVASTAWA Versus MADHUBALA @ RENU SHRIVASTAVA ----------- 2 4.9.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner at the outset has sought leave to withdraw this application which is his submission has become infructuous in as much as the impugned order was passed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, whereas the matrimonial case itself had been disposed of. While this Court would not like to make any express any view on the aforementioned submissions, the prayer made by the Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is allowed and this Civil Revision is permitted to be withdrawn. The withdrawal of this application will never mean that the amount of maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act awarded by the Court below in the impugned order and assailed in this application, was/is not payable and in fact, the Court below will ensure that whatever amount up to the date of disposal of the maintenance case is admissible and found payable in terms of the impugned order, is realized from the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With the aforementioned observations and directions, this civil revision is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)