€43 I {‘rplqolq m THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT HILASPUR w.PsNo. NW? /2006} (3.13.) ETITIONER a /O/mprakash Devangan, P S / o Shri Ramsharan Lala Devangan, aged about 42 years, R/o Bajrang Nagar Takhatpur, Bilaspur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretary , Education Department , D‘K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Director of public Instruction , Pensionbada Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2266F THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT O CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (5) No. 1167 of 200/ Pe'rifioner : Ompmkash Dcvangm Versus \ Respondems 5mm of Chhaffisgarh d: anoiher Singte Bench: Hon'bic-Mr. Jusfiaz Satish K. Agnihm. Mr. Kumnresh Tiwari, Advocate for 1he peti‘l'ioner. Smt Anju Ahujo, Deputy 5overnm¢nt Advoonfe for #he Smfe/respondenfs. ORDER (Passed on fhis 28*” Day of February, 200 Learned counsel appaoring for me pe'tifioner submits tho? the pe'rifioner is working as Assistan-r Teacher/Lecturer. The petMomr ob'rained 8. Ed. Examinafion certified: on 23-54994, on his own expenszs. immed counsel opponring, for 'rhe pei'ifioncr mbmii’s fha‘t fhe question involved, heroin osto wheiher ‘rhe feuoher, who obtained B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses is entitied to two advance increments. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Yoshwant Kumar Bhorodwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, burg Md another {2006 (H) MPJR-CG 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwmt Kumor Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, burg and mother (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained 8. Ed. /B.T.I. Examination Certificate on their own @ expenses, are covered by 1he cirwiar dated 24.12.98 ksued by the S‘ru'l'e Governmem of Madhyn Pmdadn. Learned counsel for the pefitioner further submHs fhat fhe facts md question of hw involved in the presen'f case are squarely covered by decision of +his Court in the case of Vashwon'r Kulnor Bharodwai‘ Vs. Municipal Corporc‘l'ion, burg and another (Supm), lo which learned counsel appearing for ihe respondenfs fairly concedes and agrees with The avermen'l made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Accordingly, 'lhe writ pe‘l'ifion is allowed in l'ernis of fhe order passed in 'lhe case of Vaslwon‘l' Kunar Bha'adwaj Vs. Mdpol Corporation. Du‘g and ano‘i‘her (Suprax subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own emnses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid ’m advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- l l :‘Satish K.Agnihotri J " Judge r Subhosh i l