IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28073 of 2010 ALLAU MIYAN SON OF HASIM MIYAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.8.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, the State and the informant. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the kidnapping was for purposes of marriage, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 20.2.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge IInd, Saran at Chapra in Sessions Trial No.436 of 2010 arising out of Tarayan P.S.case No.15 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )