•^i^' % 03 IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRFT PETITtON f0] N0. •31^o /i2006 PETITIONER ^ ^- Tularam Dewangan son of Khadhauram Dewangan, aged 60 years, resident of village Seoni, P.S. Champa, District Janjgir-Champa [CG] RESPONDENTS :-1] ^^ ^^?' / :--;: ^y" >•"' <-^ ^\'y V..' ^-^ '^ ^^y^^ .„/^, 'i^ ir^ / 2] .3] 4] ^-5] ^7] /8] 9] VERSUS Stafe of Chhattisgarh, Through- Collectdr, Korba /Collector Janjgir- Champa [C.G.J. Assistant Registrar, Pirms and Society, Vikrant Bhavan, Jarahabhata, Bilaspur [C.G.]. Registrar, Firms and Society, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.]. Gopichand son of Ram Lal, aged 50 years, Resident of village- Beladula, P.0. Beladula, Police Station Jaijaipur, District Janjgir- Champa [C.G.]. Santram Mehar, S/o Nanthuram, aged 52 year, R/o village Seoni, Post and P.S. Champa, District Janjgir - Champa [C.G.]. Prem Lal S/o Jutiya, aged 40 years, R/o village Seoni, PoSt and P.S. Champa, District Janjgir- Champa [C.G.]. Ram Gopal S/o Pran, aged 55 years, R/o village Seoni, Post and P.S. Champa, District Janjgir- Champa [C.G.]. Jagdish S/o Ghukhan Lal, aged 65 years, R/ovillage Mohnikala, Post and P.S. Sakti, District Janjgir- Champa [C.G.]. Dhaniram S/p Pakluram, aged 65 years, R/o village Mohnikala, Post and P.S. Sakti, District Janjgir- Champa [C.G.]. 1 '.-^' -^- 40] Bhagaiu-am s/o Buddhuram, aged 70 years, R/o village Seoni, Post and P.S. Champa,District Janjgir- Champa [C.G.]. ^ . . ' ' . WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ XI-HC-22 3^ '<<l'i|lff<<, »ll1(1'l6,Rfliyy !T^r<ra^ tftj.P. ^^o^^n^l^ Nitini sbKith •••••••••••••••"•••• g^y 200 Rre% •ni^r^T R-fi+sn^r 'giWFtriN' sfi^TSRn'WflfscT cKpftvs^R imaf rr' fs^S <Riwi< ^srf^iTan^r 20.9.2006 Ms. Nirupaiua Bajpai an<^ Shri Vimtesh Bajpai, Advocates for the petitioner. Shri N.K.Agrawal, Dy. ^dvocate General for the State/ respondent No. 1 on advance copy. Heard ou adniission. The inain grievaace of th^ 4 to 10, without registration of^ ia the nanie aad style of "Safh^ittar Gram Dewaugaa Saniaj" aiid they have scribed their own coijistitutiou, according to which, they have niade certaia provisions, ^hich are not pennissible under fhe law. It is submitted that th| married to one Rajendia Kuin^ Tehsil-Sakti, District-Janjgir Ch^inipa aud when she was ffl-treated by the in-laws, the petitioner petition, a charge sheet agaiiist| is also stated that because of fll was recorded and published on m. fact, the aforesaid Sociely, so contrary to law and the ineinb agauist the interest of the peti that a writ in. fhe nature of respondents No. 1 to3 to s petitioner is that respondents No. he Society, are ninning the Society daughter of the petitioner was Dewangaa, resident of Mohandi, lodged a report against theni ui Chauipa PoUce Station, on whic^-, accoriing to fhe pleadia.gs ofthe fhe accused persoas was fUed. It .e report, lodged by fhe petitioner, fhe respondents Society boycot|Ed the petitioner and the boycott 11.5.2.2006. It is further stated that constituted by the respoudents, is ;is of the Society are also acting 1[ioner. The pedtioner has prayed Imandainus should be issued to i|top fhe activities of fhe priy^te XI-HC-22 T£T"i<iiii<n'ii, ®Tn*i'i6,Ricii+iy J^(1@R;^770J/^06 WpCt?KW"~'"""""'""" W[ 200 {Sre^: an^r^r )^:fN;3T^?r giwq;Hf?a' 3:T^ST?WTSgT(rf%tT 2 - <til<<?cl<fl-l iWdT ff IWt <Rl''-<il< ^ari^iTsn^r ^.\^ respondents/Society. It has alsc) ofthe Society, so frained by the4i, In the opinion ofthis CoTJirt not be issued. The aUegations petition, if believed, results ia|to which, the petitiouer can avail 4 euvisaged under flie law, Admi|l petitioner in this writ petitio4 investigation, and the same caiji evidence ia the said rcgard whicj I do not find any reason dispute between fhe petitioner ^i writ jurisdiction vested with ttus| The sarue is disinissed at the adj However, the petitionei| appropriate reinedy before the accordauce with law. been piayed that the Constitution L, be set aside by fhis Court. i|irt, a writ in the above nature caa il'aised by the petitioner in the writ various causes of actions, on 1'ivfl as weU as criminal i-einedies as (:tedly, flie pleadings taken by the are fhe niatter of iaquuy and be adjudicated onty after taking |i is not possible in a writ petition. to uiterfere in the said inter-party ^nd the private respoadents in the Court. The petition has no inerit. Itiussion stage itself. shaU be at liberty to avail bivil as weU as criiainal courts ia Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge y ^ ('fl^^)^) o •s.