^S^.4':'?^:^,!^^^ HtQH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) No. 1600 of 2007 PetUioner Respondents Versus 1. Prem. Nath Acharya, son of Sfari 'l'ulsi Kaai Acharya, aged about 26 ycars, resident of Grain. and Post Kanje, '{'atisU aad Uistricf Dantewada (C.G.) State of Chliattisgarh, tbiough fhc Sccretaiy, Departsaent of Panchayat and Rural Developaa.en.t, Uau Kalyan Smgh yAawan, Raipiu-fC.G.) Collector and Officiatmg District Project Coordinator (NKISGA) District South Bastar, Dantewada 3. (Cfaliattisgarhj Clucf ISxccutivc Officcr, Jite Paactsayat District Soufh Bastar, Daatewada, (C.G.) Chief Bxecutive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Geedaia, Uistt. South Bastar, Dantewada, C.G, Mahesh Thakur, son of Kainal Singh 'l'hakur, resident of vfflage and post Raaje, Tahsil aitd District lantpwnria ((''.(t.l l.*A<.tA ^•^fl'^JItf SiagSe Bencfe : HonTslc Mr. Justicc SaSisii K. AgaiStotri. Sbri Rahul Jba, Advocate for Uae petitioa.er. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt. Advoc&te for the respoadents No. 1 & 2. O R D E R (Passed or, this 30th day ofApril, 2007} I. Leamed couasel appearing for the petitioner, on mstructions, submits tfaat the petitioner seeks for permission of this Court to withdraw fhis petition wifh liberty to make a repFesentation to the respondent No.2 for rcdressal of his grievaaces aad fhe respondent No.2 may be directed to consider aud decide the I'epresentation offhe petitioner withiu stipulated period. 2. Leamed couusel appearing for the respondeats No. 1 and 2 has no objection to fhe above submisskia niade by learued counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of fh.e above, this petition is dismissed as wifhdrawn, with the above-stated liberty. The respondent No.2 is directed to consider aad decide the representation., if any, in accordance with lasr, within a reasonable period. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 'nialan- ss^