IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 23867 of 2010 Date of decision: 08.0.2010 Arshad ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. R S Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan Pathak, Advocate for the petitioner Ms Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana for the respondent - State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the present petitioner was named by co-accused, namely, Jaikam, who has already been granted the concession of regular bail by the trial Court. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Mewat. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge September 08,2010 mohan