1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.920 OF 2009 Sangramsingh s/o Randhirsingh Khichad ... PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others ... RESPONDENTS ----- Mrs. Madhaveshwari D. Thube Mhase, Advocate for the petitioner (appointed) Shri K.S. Patil, A.P.P. for respondents ----- CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, JJ. DATED : 7th January, 2010. ORAL ORDER: 1. Mrs. Thube, learned counsel appointed for the petitioner states that she is in receipt of a communication from the petitioner, informing her that the petitioner does not wish to prosecute the petition further. This petition came to be registered on the basis of a communication issued through jail and we have accordingly appointed Mrs. Thube as a counsel to represent the petitioner in this petition. The communication addressed by the petitioner to the learned counsel appointed for the petitioner is 2 taken on record and marked “X” for the purpose of identification. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. We, however, quantify the fees payable to the learned counsel for the petitioner at Rs.2000/-. [ SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.] [ P.V. HARDAS, J.] fmp/cwp920.09