1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2720 OF 2010 (Sau. Radha G. Bhoot & Anr. vs. Yashwant L. Sakore & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JUNE 17, 2010. Heard Shri Deshpande, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Kadu, learned counsel for respondent No.1. The respondent – defendant moved an application for amendment but mentioned survey number of land in dispute incorrectly therein. Therefore, he moved another application for amendment and sought leave to correct the survey number pleaded in first amendment application. Trial Court has granted that prayer. Shri Deshpande, learned counsel contends that there is no procedure of filing such application for amendment of application for amendment and hence the order is unsustainable. The effort of the respondent is only to demonstrate correct Survey number by making amendment in its amendment application which has been inadvertently pleaded incorrectly in amendment application filed under Order 6, Rule 17 of Civil 2 Procedure Code. I do not find any jurisdictional error or perversity in the approach of the trial Court. No case is made out warranting any interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is, therefore, rejected. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.