IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10235 of 2010 1. VIJAY LAXMI DEVI W/O SANJEEV LAL DAS R/O VILL.- MATIYAR KHURD, AT+P.O.- MATIYAR KALA, P.S.- SAHIYARA, DISTT.- SITAMARHI---------------------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SITAMARHI 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SITAMARHI 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, SITAMARHI 5. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SITAMARHI 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BATHNAHA, SITAMARHI 7. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, SITAMARHI 8. THE MUKHIA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, MATIYAR KALA, SITAMARHI 9. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, MATIYAR KALA, SITAMARHI-----------------RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 3.3.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The Court fails to understand as to why the present writ application has been filed because admitted position is that she has not been working in the so called school as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra from 21.9.2005 since she was unwell. Now she has recovered and she is seeking the position in the school. The appointment of the petitioner was on the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra and contractual in nature. She voluntarily absented for a long period of time. In view of above whatever be the reason or explanation of absence there cannot be any occasion to give a direction for accommodating the petitioner on the post according to her convenience. There is no merit in this writ application and it is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)