IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) No. 4379 of 2008 Date of decision: 29.10.2010 Dharam Vir Singh …….Petitioner. Vs. State of H.P. and others …..…Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Surinder Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mrs. Ruma Kaushik, Addl. A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 3. Justice Kuldip Singh, J (oral) The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per Annexure A-14, dated 2.1.2003, the matter is still pending before respondent No.1. He has submitted that in these circumstances, a time bound direction may be given to respondent No.1 to consider the case of the petitioner and the petitioner may also be permitted to make supplementary submissions by way of representation. The learned Addl. Advocate General has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In these circumstances, the petitioner is at liberty to make supplementary submissions by way of representation to respondent 2 No.1 within one month and the respondent No.1 is directed to decide such representation and pending matter of petitioner adverting to the points raised in the representation by a speaking order after hearing the petitioner in further two months. The petitioner shall also supply a copy of this judgment along with representation to the respondent No.1. The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. October 29, 2010 (Justice Kuldip Singh), (pankaj) Judge.