[1] IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 881 OF 2008 IN NOTICE OFMOTION NO. 240 OF 2003 IN SUIT NO. 285 OF 2003 Feber Castell Aktiengeshellschaft and Anr. ... Appellants. [Orig. Plaintiffs.] Versus Pikpen Private Ltd. ... Respondents. [Orig. Defendants.] Manish Saurashtree i/b. Shantilal & Co. for the appellant. Ms Nagma Shaikh i/b. Vigil Jurish for respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : D.K.Deshmukh and : D.K.Deshmukh and : D.K.Deshmukh and A.A.Sayed, A.A.Sayed, A.A.Sayed, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : February 16, 2009. : February 16, 2009. : February 16, 2009. [2] P.C. 1. This appeal arises out of an interim order passed in Suit No. 285 of 2003. Parties filed consent terms in Suit No. 285 of 2003. The consent terms are taken on record and marked ’X’ for identification. Undertaking given in the consent terms are accepted. The suit is disposed of in terms of the consent terms at ’X’. As the Suit is disposed of, the Appeal is rendered infructuous. The appeal disposed of. In view of disposal of the Appeal and the Suit, Cross-objection (Lodging) No. 71 of 2003 and the Motion No. 3203 of 2003 does not survive and are accordingly disposed of. 2. The Plaintiffs shall place copy of the consent terms at ’X’ on record of the Civil Suit. [D.K.Deshmukh, [D.K.Deshmukh, [D.K.Deshmukh, J.] J.] J.] [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, J.] J.] J.]