IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.13307 of 2011 Date of Decision.27.07.2011 Pritpal Singh son of Gurdial Singh, resident of H.No.59, Baba Deep Singh Avenue, Tarn Taran Road, Amritsar and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab through its Secretary, Home Development, Punjab Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Veneet Sharma Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Navdeep Sukhna, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners shall serve four copies of writ petition and the type set to the counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4 for appropriate instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he will be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-3) is considered by respondent No.2. The petitioner is at liberty to approach the 2nd respondent and give a representation as regards his grievance along with a copy of this order within one week. The 2nd respondent shall consider the same and give the appropriate protection for their life and liberty if the situation so warrants. 3. The writ petition is disposed of this stage. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 27, 2011 Pankaj*