HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA W.P.No.9901 of 2006 Dated 23rd Septemb34, 2009 Between :- Vinukonda Nageshwar Rao .. Petitioner And Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep.by Secretary, Irrigation and Command Area Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad And others .. Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA W.P.No.9901 of 2006 ORDER:- This Court on 23-5-2006 while ordering notice before admission, granted status quo obtaining as on today shall be maintained for a period of six weeks. It is however made clear that in case if the land in question is covered by any proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, it shall be open for the respondents to takeover the possession duly intimating the petitioner of the relevant proceedings. 2. This Court on 21-7-2006 while issuing rule nisi and calling for records, further stated in W.P.M.P.No.12508/2006 that no counter is filed and the interim order granted on 23-5-2006 is extended until further orders. 3. The matter is coming up for final hearing and it is stated that no counter affidavit as on today had been filed. 4. The writ petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ directing the respondents to act in accordance with law and forbear from dispossessing the petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac.2-43 cents in Sy.No.399/1A and Ac.1-74 cents in Sy.No.398/1A of Vinukonda town and Mandal, Guntur District without following the procedure of law and without notifying the petitioner about the invalidating factors warranting coercive action against the possession of the petitioner in respect of the said lands and pass such other suitable orders. 5. Several facts had been narrated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. Rytwari Patta issued to the father of the petitioner dt.27-9-60, the order made in W.P.M.P.No.31236/2005 in W.P.No.24310/2005, dt.2-2-2006 also had been placed before this Court. In the light of the facts and circumstances and also in the light of the order of status quo which initially had been granted at the time of ordering notice before admission and subsequent thereto while issuing rule nisi¸ the same having been extended until further orders, this Court is of the considered opinion that the writ petition be disposed of with a direction directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject matter of the writ petition unless and until due process of law is followed. 6. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. ____________________ Justice P.S.Narayana 23rd September, 2009 smr