IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.997 of 2006 JAWAHAR PRASAD @ JAWAHAR LAL Versus SMT.USHA DEVI ----------- 3 14.11.2008 Heard Counsel for the parties. In the opinion of this Court, the Court below has not committed any jurisdictional error in disallowing the three question which were being asked on behalf of the defendant-petitioner to the plaintiff’s witness. These questions were in relation to a document which was never brought on record till the stage of Order XIII Rule 1. As a matter of fact, the petitioner had subsequently filed an application for taking the said document on record which was also dismissed by the same impugned order, which however has not been assailed in this Court separately in as much this Civil Revision application is confined to only part of the order disallowing these three question, to be put to the witnesses of the plaintiff. The Court below infact had little option but to reject the prayer of the petitioner with regard to the three questions which were related to that very document. The submission of the Counsel for the petitioner that reference of such a document was made by the defendant petitioner in the written statement is neither here nor there inasmuch as what is really to be looked into was as to whether the document was on record so that the attention of the plaintiff’s witness could have been drawn towards it. That being so, this Court does not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order and accordingly, this application is dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)