IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8131 of 2008 Gangadhar Mishra, son of Gonanand Mishra, resident of village Hari Lochanpur Tishwara, P.S. Sarai Ranjan, District- Samastipur. ………. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through D.M. Samastipur 2.Block Development Officer, Sarai Ranjan, Samastipur 3.Secretary Gram Panchayat Raj Harpur Badhaita Block District- Samastipur 4.Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Harpur Badhaita Block, District- Samastipur 5.Gram Sewak, Panchayat Raj Harpur Badhaita Block, District- Samastipur. ………… Respondents ---------------------------------- with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8145 of 2008 Vidyadhar Mishra son of Gonanand Mishra, resident of village Hari Lochanpur Tishwara, P.S. Sarai Ranjan, District- Samastipur. ………. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through D.M. Samastipur 2.Block Development Officer, Sarai Ranjan, Samastipur 3.Secretary Gram Panchayat Raj Harpur Badhaita Block District- Samastipur 4.Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Harpur Badhaita Block, District- Samastipur 5.Gram Sewak, Panchayat Raj Harpur Badhaita Block, District- Samastipur. ………… Respondents ---------------------------------- 2. 11/08/2011 Petitioners’ grievance in both the writ applications is in respect of non- consideration of their case for appointment as Shiksha Mitra in 2005. There is nothing on record to show that petitioners had filed any complaint against the same before any appropriate authority before 2006 Rules came into force and post 2 of Shiksha Mitra was converted into regular post of Panchayat Teacher. In the circumstances, claim of the petitioners suffers from delay and laches. Both the writ applications are therefore dismissed on account of the same. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)