Cm£\m%@ ‘® t F CHHATTISGARH BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT O AT BILASPUR ‘Mmfh r3 mm W.P.gs)No. -3%$3 [2009 @Syerma, S/o Shri B.S. Verma, Aged about 48 years, Working as Assistant ?rofessor (Department Of Political Science), in Government P.G. College Mahasamund, District —Mahasamund,_ R/o Sahu Sadan, Near Canal, Club Para, $ Mahasamund, District Mahasamund C} C9 ! Pefitioner Versus /State of Chhattisgarh, through The Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) / ‘ The Director, Directorate of Higher ‘ i, Education, D K S Bhavan, Raipur (C G ) 3. V The Principal, Government P.G. College Mahasamund, District, Mahasamund 2. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGH AT BILASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) Writ Petition (S) No. 433201” 2009 PETITIONER M.S.Verma VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others. Shri Manish Sharma counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur Dy. AG for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (13.08.2009) With the consent of the counsel for the patties, the matter is heard finally. Grievance of the petitioner in this petition is that despite the orders passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in the identical matters being W.P. No. 4863/2001 and WP. No. 2620/2006 (S) (Annexure P—Q) the petitioner has not been granted the selection grade and senior pay scale. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to the respondents/authorities that if the petitioner makes a representation detailing his grievances therein, the same shall be decided expeditiously. To this submission of the counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the respondents/State has no objection. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities concerned that if the petitioner makes a representation within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same shall be decided within a further period of two months ’ from the date of its receipt in the light of the aforementioned decisions of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge