IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-11-2007 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition Nos.6320 and 6321 of 1999 R.Subramani .. Petitioner in W.P.No.6320 of 1999 R.S.Nagachandran .. Petitioner in W.P.No.6321 of 1999 Versus 1.District Collector/District Registrar (Indian Stamp Act) Sub-Registrar's Office, Namagiripettai, Rasipuram 2. The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (Registration and Stamps) Chepauk, Chennai-5. 3.Inspector General of Registration, Chennai-28. 4.The Tahsildar, Rasipuram. .. Respondents in both the writ petitions. Prayer in W.P.No.6320 of 1999: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records comprised in the proceeding of the 4th respondent signed on 20.03.99 and its original records on the file of the other respondents and consequently or subsequent proceedings, if any, and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondent from levying any penal charge under Section 40 the Indian Stamp Act with reference to the sale Deed bearing temporary Registration No.913/96 on the file of the 1st respondent. Prayer in W.P.No.6321 of 1999: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records comprised in the proceeding of the 4th respondent signed on 20.03.99 and its original records on the file of the other respondents and consequently or subsequent proceedings, if any, and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondent from levying any penal charge under Section 40 the Indian Stamp Act with reference to the sale Deed bearing temporary Registration No.912/96 on the file of the 1st respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Petitioner : Mr.P.Mathivanan For Respondents : Mr.V.Manoharan Government Advocate O R D E R Today, when these writ petitions were taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents had submitted that the documents in question, in the above writ petitions, have been returned to the petitioners under the Samadan Scheme, on 26.11.2002 and 29.11.2002, after collecting the deficit stamp duty. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has not controverted the above said submission made on behalf of the respondents. 3. In such circumstances, the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. csh Sd/- Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar To 1.District Collector/District Registrar (Indian Stamp Act) Sub-Registrar's Office, Namagiripettai, Rasipuram 2. The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (Registration and Stamps) Chepauk, Chennai-5. 3.Inspector General of Registration, Chennai-28. 4.The Tahsildar, Rasipuram. +2 cc to The Government Pleader Sr.Nos.70301 & 70302. AKR(CO) dcp/30.11 Writ Petition Nos.6320 and 6321 of 1999 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/