IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE SECOND APPEAL NO.295 OF 2006 SECOND APPEAL NO.295 OF 2006 SECOND APPEAL NO.295 OF 2006 Pandurang Balkrishna Chavare .. Appellant V/s The Collector, Satara & 3 Ors. .. Respondents Mr.A.S.Desai for the Appellant. Mr.S.N.Gawade, AGP for the Respondents. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J. DATE : 30TH JUNE, 2006. DATE : 30TH JUNE, 2006. DATE : 30TH JUNE, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Both the Courts below have categorically held that the well in the Appellant’s land was not a constructed well and as such, the Appellant was not entitled to get compensation which was wrongly paid to him with regard to Gut No.398 and with which the Appellant was not really concerned. Both the Courts below have given a concurrent finding of facts. There is no substantial question of law involved in this Appeal. Appeal therefore stands dismissed. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)