THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO Dated this the 13th day of November, 2009. Contempt Case No. 1580 of 2009. Between: The Co-operative Department Employees and Co-operative Bank Employees, Co-operative House Building Society rep by its Secretary S.V.Dharma Rao. ……..Petitioner vs. Vadapalli Butchi Venkata Rao …….Respondent. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO Contempt Case No. 1580 of 2009. ORAL ORDER: Entertaining W.P.No. 10020 of 2007, this Court granted interim direction as prayed for in W.P.M.P.No. 12711 of 2007 on 9.5.2007. The said writ petition has been instituted by Sri.Rama Sugars Staff and Workers, Industrial Housing Society, Limited, Bobbili, Vizianagaram District represented by its Secretary Vadapalli Butchi Venkata Rao. The respondents 4 to 6 are sought to be restrained by the writ petitioner from alienating and raising any constructions in the schedule property. The 4th respondent namely, the Co-operative Department Employees and Co-operative Bank Employees, Co-operative House Building Society, Bobbili has moved the present contempt case complaining that the writ petitioner has violated the order passed on 9.5.2007. The present contempt case is totally misconceived one. The order passed on 9.5.2007 is to restrain the respondents 4 to 6 in the W.P.M.P. No. 12711 of 2007 namely, the Co-operative Department Employees and Co-operative Bank Employees, Co-operative House Building Society, Bobbili, Sri.V.P.Rama Rao, Secretary, Bobbili Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd., Bobbili and M/s Aster Infrastructure Private Ltd., represented by its Authorized Signatory Sri. Aditya Kiran. The writ petitioner/Sri Rama Sugars Staff & Workers Industrial Housing Society Ltd., is not restrained by any court much less by this Court on 9.5.2007. Therefore, the question of the writ petitioner violating the order passed by this Court on 9.5.2007 in W.P.M.P.No. 12711 of 2007 does not arise. If the respondents 4 to 6 in the said WPMP seek protection in the matter even at the hands of the writ petitioner, they ought to have moved an application by way of WPMP, for consideration of this Court. This Contempt case is therefore misconceived and it is accordingly dismissed without costs. _____________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO,J 13.11.2009. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO Contempt Case No. 1580 of 2009. Dated 13.11.2009.