1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1444 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.803 OF 2003 Duraiya Mansur Petiwala & Anr. ..Plaintiffs. V/s. Shabbir Hussain Taherbhai Petiwala & ors...Defendants. Mr.Kevic Setalvad, Ms.Suja T.C. i/b. Dunmorr Sett for plaintiffs. Mr.Vivek Kantawala i/b. Kantawala & Co. for defendant No. 3A. Mr.Janak Dwarkadas with Mr. Birendra Saraf & Mr. Subhash Jadhav i/b. ALMT Legal for defendant No.2. Ms. Ruptali Dixit i/b. Maneksha & Sethna for defendant No.4. Mr. Vivek Sharma for defendant No.3B. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : APRIL 24, 2007. DATE : APRIL 24, 2007. DATE : APRIL 24, 2007. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Counsel for the parties inform that the parties have agreed to explore possibility of settlement. They have agreed to approach Justice A.B.Palkar, former Judge of this Court for resolution of all the disputes through mediation. Besides, the parties have agreed for interim arrangement, to be arrived between them till the mediation proceedings were to be concluded. In view of this arrangement, 2 nothing would survive for consideration in the present Notice of Motion. Understanding reached between the parties has been reduced into writing, duly signed by the advocate for respective parties, titled as Minutes of order dated 24th April, 2007. The same is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 2. Accordingly, this Notice of Motion is disposed of in terms of the Minutes of order, leaving all questions open and giving liberty to the parties to apply afresh, if and when occasion arises.