IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 27TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 8TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 23709 of 2008(V) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ NAGATH V.RAJEEVAN, NAGATH HOUSE, NADUVANNUR, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. MR.P.P.JACOB RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. DISTRICT REGISTRAR (G), KOZHIKODE, AUTHORITY UNDER SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT, KOZHIKODE. 2. THE NADUVANNUR HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL SOCIETY, MANAGING COMMITTEE, NADUVANNUR, KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE. *ADDL.R4 IS IMPLEADED: R4. ACHUTHAN NAIR, NADUVANNUR HIGH SCHOOL SOCIETY, PRESIDENT, NADUVANNUR, KOZHIKODE. (*ADDL.R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DTD. 18/08/2008 IN I.A.NO.10454/2008) R1 & R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. M.A.ASIF R2 & ADDL.R4 BY ADVS.MR.V.A.MUHAMMED, MR.K.E.HAMZA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.23709/2008 V APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DTD. 4/03/2008. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DTD. 18/12/2007. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY PETITIONER TO THE THIRD RESPONDENT DTD. 15/04/2008. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DTD. 20/06/08. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DTD.18/07/08. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R2(A): COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP(C) NO.20674/2008 DTD. 16/07/2008. /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 23709 of 2008 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 27th day of February, 2009 JUDGMENT Although, several issues have been raised in this writ petition, the only point raised before me at the time of hearing is that the first respondent should be called upon to consider Exhibit P6 objection filed in response to Exhibit P5. Exhibit P5 is the notice issued by the first respondent calling upon the petitioner to file their objections if any, to an application made by the additional 4th respondent for the revival of a society registrated with Registration No.S2/1950. In pursuance to Exhibit P5, the petitioner filed Exhibit P6 objection before the first respondent. The final decision on the request made by the additional 4th respondent on the revival application submitted by the second respondent in the matter of the aforesaid defunct society (Registration No.S2/1950) has not been taken. In view of this writ petition is disposed of directing that the first respondent shall, while considering the application made by the society referred to above, consider Exhibit P6 objection also and pass orders thereon. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE scm