1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.538 OF 2009 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGEMENT NO.81 OF 2008 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.1982 OF 2007 Jalaram Construction Company and Anr. .. Appellant Versus Kishor Jethalal Morbia .. Respondent ALONG WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4267 OF 2009 WITH APPEAL NO.539 OF 2009 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGEMENT NO.78 OF 2008 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.1982 OF 2007 Jalaram Construction Company & Ors. .. Appellant Versus Ramesh Jethalal Morbia .. Respondent ALONG WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4270 OF 2009 WITH APPEAL NO.540 OF 2009 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGEMENT NO.80 OF 2008 IN 2 SUMMARY SUITY NO.1983 OF 2007 Jalaram Construction Company .. Appellant Versus Kavita Kishore Morbia .. Respondent ALONG WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4268 OF 2009 WITH APPEAL NO.541 OF 2009 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGEMENT NO.79 OF 2008 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.1985 OF 2007 Jalaram Construction Company .. Appellant Versus Manjula Jethalal Morbia .. Respondent ALONG WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4269 OF 2009 Mr.Sunil More for appellant Mr.Devani for respondent CORAM : ANIL R. DAVE, C.J. & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 2nd March 2010. P.C.: 1] The learned Advocate appearing for the appellant in all these 3 appeals has submitted that his client requires further time to make payment of the amount in pursuance of the impugned orders. 2] Looking to the facts of the case, the appellant is granted further period of eight weeks from today for making payment in pursuance of the impugned orders. With this direction the appeals are disposed of. 3] In view of the extension granted, the learned Advocate for appellant withdraws the chamber summonses for extension of time. In view of this order, even, the notices of motion taken out do not survive and are dismissed as such. (CHIEF JUSTICE) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)