IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 22ND FEBRUARY 2007 / 3RD PHALGUNA 1928 WP(C).No. 6044 of 2007(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- BENOY. P. EAPEN, S/O. A.M. POULOSE, ARUMANA HOUSE, CHELAKOMPU P.O., KARUKACHAL (HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (MATHS), CMS HIGH SCHOOL, MUNDAKAYAM) BY ADV. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND RESPONDENTS: -------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (EDUCATION), OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (EDUCATION), KOTTAYAM. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOTTAYAM. 5. THE CORPORATE MANAGER, CMS SCHOOLS, DIOCESE OF MADHYA KERALA, CATHEDRAL ROAD, KOTTAYAM. 6. SMT. JUBY THOMAS THOPPIL, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, CMS HS, MUDIAPPALLY. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No.6044 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of February, 2007 JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges Ext.P14. Petitioner has already preferred Ext.P15 revision before the Government. In such circumstances, I am not inclined to consider the question raised in the writ petition as the petitioner has already invoked the alternate forum available to him. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner will be reverted pursuant to Ext.P14. 2. Heard Government Pleader also. In such circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of as follows: Leaving open the contentions of the petitioner, writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P15 after hearing the petitioner and any other affected party within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. If the petitioner moves an application seeking interim relief before the first respondent, appropriate orders in accordance with law shall be passed by the first respondent within five days from the date of receipt of a copy of the application. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb K.M.JOSEPH, JJ. - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A. No. OF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT Dated this the day of February, 2006.