IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 25TH BHADRA 1931 RP.No. 882 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.4500/2005 Dated 19/06/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS IN WP(C) ------------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT (LR), SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY G.P. SRI.SANDESH RAJA RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER IN WP(C) ---------------------------------- N.MADHAVAN NAIR, EX.PARE TROOPER NO.2550327, RESIDING AT PUSHPA VILASAM, ALTHARA MOODU(PO), VIA.ALAMCODE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.J.JAYAKUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... R.P. No.882 of 2009 in W.P.(C) No.4500 of 2005 .................................................................... Dated this the 16th day of September, 2009. ORDER Review Petition is filed with inordinate delay of 399 days. I am of the view that only when appearance was ordered pursuant to non- compliance with judgment, State has come up with this Review Petition. Further, the direction in the judgment was to the District Collector to comply with Government Orders on assignment of land to the respondent, under Government Order dated 10.5.1999. It is seen from the Review Petition that respondent's eligibility for assignment made ten years back is considered with reference to his current income. Therefore, there is neither merit in the Review Petition much less any justification to condone the delay in filing it. The prayer for condonation of delay is rejected and the Review Petition is consequently dismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms