CWP No.21795 of 2010.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.21795 of 2010 Date of Decision: 13.12.2010 **** Tarun Jain . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Haryana and others . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. CM Munjal, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner along with his partner claims to have een cheated by one Anthony T.Rivas and his wife Sonia Mehndiratta who allegedly entered into an agreement to sell with them in respect of an immoveable property which had already been sold to someone else. (2). On this premise, the petitioner alleges that he and his partner has been duped to the tune of crores of rupees but the complaint statedly made to the police authorities is lying unattended as no action thereupon has been taken so far. (3). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, however, without expressing any view on merits of the allegations, especially when the respondents or CWP No.21795 of 2010.doc - 2 – the alleged suspects have not been heard by this Court, however, since the complaint made by the petitioner, prima facie, requires to be enquired into, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.3 to issue appropriate instructions to the police authorities to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s complaint in accordance with law as early as possible but not later than two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (4). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 13.12.2010 vishal shonkar (SURYA KANT) JUDGE