Petltioners Respondents COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH: SILASPUR Writ Petltjon (0 Ho.JBJ OF 2009 1. fvladhu. S/o. Shri Sahnl, aged about 40 years, r/o. viljage Bonda, Tahsij Sarangarh, Dlstt. Raigarh (CG). 2. Sagar, S/o. Shri Sahni, aged about 45 years, r/o. villag® Sonda, Tahsli Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary Panchayat D.K.S. Bhawan, Rajpur (CG). 2. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Baramkeia, Dlstt. Raigarh (CG). 3. Coliector, Raigarh, Distt. Rigam (CG). 4. Naib Tahsildar, Sariya, Distt. Raigarh (CG). 5. Sarpanch Gram Panchayat, Bonda, Distt. Ralgarh (CG). (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of Constitution of india) SB: Hon'ble r»1r. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Raju Present: K4r. N.K. Chhaterjee, counsei for the petitioners. IV!r\ Bhaskar Payasi, Panei Lawyer for the State. (Passed on this 9m day of February, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submsts that the petitioners Impugn the notlce dated 30-7-2008 (Anrsexure P/1) issued by Gram Panchayat, Bonda. Learned counsel further submsts that in response to the notice, repty has aiso been filed and formal order is-stijl awaited. 2) The petitioners ought to have filed thelr reply to the show cause notlce before coming to this Court. At this stage, this court cannot jnterfere with the notice v/nen there is no other reason invoking jurisdiction of thls court to interfere wlth the show cause notice. After reply is fiied to show cause notice and if some order js passed, the petitioners may approach the proper forum, if so advised. This petitjon is pre-mature at this stage. 3) Accordingiy, this petition is dismissed. Consequently, I.A.No.1 aiso stands disposed of. Consequently, I.A.No.1 also stands dismissed. — Satish K. Agnihotri Judge