IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO. 1724 OF 2005. IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5500 OF 2000. N. Balasubramanian ..... ...Petitioner. V/s Union of India & Ors.... ... Respondents. Shri S. G. Deshmukh for the applicant. CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND S. A. BOBDE, JJ. 27.6.2005 PC: Heard Shri Deshmukh on merits. It is true that Shri Deshmukh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in the main writ petition did not on that day have any instructions regarding withdrawal of the petition. The order allowing the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to take appropriate remedy was passed so that the petitioner can proceed in appropriate Court for recovery of delayed interest as alleged by the petitioner. Taking into consideration the factual situation the order of permitting withdrawal of the petition is recalled and the petition is taken up for hearing immediately.