IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.1632 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 07, 2010 Baldev Singh & Others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. K.K. Garg, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for respondent Nos.1 to 3. None for respondent Nos.4 to 32. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing tentative seniority list of Head Warders, Jail Department, Punjab. 2. It transpires that while the petition was pending, the seniority list has been finalised. The petitioners have been given their CWP No.1632 of 2010 [2] due in the seniority list and therefore, the matter, in effect, has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners would be aggrieved only by one person who has been placed at Serial No.93 in the final seniority list and the petitioners be given liberty to challenge the same. 4. The petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. The petitioners, at the first instance, would have the right to file a representation in regard to the existing claim and in case, they are not satisfied with the decision of the department, they would be at liberty to approach this Court. (AJAI LAMBA) September 07, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?