Civil Revision No. 2698 of 2010 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2698 of 2010 Date of decision: 26.4.2010 Sukhdev Singh alias Dupehra etc. ...Petitioner Versus Natha Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Tribhuwan Singla, Advocate for the petitioners. S.D.ANAND, J. A plea raised by the plaintiff-applicant for amendment of the plaint and to thereby implead a real brother of defendant-respondent came to be negatived by the learned Trial Court which observed that the allowance of the amendment plea would amount to validation of a cause which is time barred. The plaintiff-petitioner had filed a civil suit for specific performance which was based upon agreement dated 5.11.2004. As per the contractual agreement, the sale deed was to be got regsitered on 15.6.2005. The other party to the agreement was a real brother of the defendant-respondent. However, the plaintiff-petitioner filed a civil suit against the defendant who is not a party to the impugned agreement. For the very reasons noticed by the learned Trial Court, interference in the impugned order is declined. Disposed of accordingly. April 26, 2010 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge