1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO: 4961/2008 (Prakash Sitaram Tondre and others vs. State of Maharashtra and others) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. ................................................................................................................................... CORAM: D.D.SINHA & A. P. BHANGALE , JJ. DATED: 12th January, 2009. *** 1. Heard Mr Anand Parchure, learned counsel for petitioners; Mrs. Bharati Dangre, learned Additional Govt. Pleader for Respondents 1 and 3 and Mr. Mohan Sudame, for Respondent no. 2. 2. Mr. Parchure, learned counsel for petitioners has submitted that the advertisement dated 6.5.2008 was published by Respondent No.2- Zilla Parishad for filling up the posts of contractual Gramsevaks. The final select list of GramSevaks was published by Zilla Parishad on 9.7.2008. The names of the petitioners were in the final select list and, therefore, the petitioners were sent for training course at Gramsevak Training Centre, Sindewahi. The petitioners have completed the said course and certificate of completion was issued in their favour by the Principal, Gramsevak Training Centre, Sindewahi. The petitioners on 7.11.2008 submitted a representation to the Respondent-Zilla Parishad for issuance of order of appointment to the 2 petitioners as Gramsevaks; however, the orders of appointment have not been issued by Zilla Parishad till this date and, therefore, the present petition. 3. Mr Sudame, learned counsel for Respondent-Zilla Parishad, has submitted that if the representations are not decided by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad till this date, the same shall be decided on its own merit and in accordance with law, within a period of fifteen days from today by following the principles of natural justice. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the order of status quo which is already passed in the present Writ Petition may be continued till the decision is taken by the Zilla Parishad on the above-referred representations. 5. In the circumstances, we dispose of the present Writ Petition, since the statement is already made by the counsel for the Zilla Parishad referred to hereinabove, no further direction at this stage is necessary. Order of status quo granted by this court to continue till the decision is taken by Zilla Parishad on the above-referred representations. JUDGE JUDGE sahare