:1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE DISTRICT : CONTEMPT PETITION NO.391 OF 2007 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.392 OF 2007 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.393 OF 2007 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.394 OF 2007 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.395 OF 2007 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.396 OF 2007 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders --------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.P.S. Dani with Mr.S.M. Tendulkar for the Petitioners. Mr.B.H.Mehta, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.P.K.Dhakephalkar, Senior Counsel with Mr.J.G.Reddy for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2008 P.C : P.C : P.C : There is no merit in these Contempt Petitions. On behalf of the Respondents, it was submitted in the Appeals from Order that the purport of the order was only for the purpose :2: of taking the application on record formally. I have come to a prima-facie conclusion that the purport of the order was not so limited and that it in fact formally decreed the suit. 2. In the facts and circumstances of this case, I do not see any intention on the part of the Respondents to have interfered with the course of justice or deliberately defied the orders of the Court. 3. The Contempt Petitions are therefore dismissed. ***