THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 20931 of 2010 Oral order: The petitioner contending that respondent No.1 at the instance of respondent No.2 is interfering with the civil disputes between him and respondent No.2 with respect to a piece of land, filed the present writ petition seeking appropriate directions to respondent No.1 not to interfere with the civil claims. Today when the matter is taken up, the learned Government Pleader for Home produced written instructions received from respondent No.1, which are placed on record. Based on the written instructions, the learned Government Pleader for Home, denied interference by respondent No.1 with the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.2 and contended that as there was complaint lodged by respondent No.2 that she was attacked by the petitioner, and based on the complaint, an F.I.R. in Crime No. 63 of 2010 for the offences under Sections 452, 427, 324 read with Section 34 I.P.C. was registered against the petitioner. In view of the above, it cannot be said that respondent No.1 has interfered with the civil disputes between the petitioner an respondent No.2. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 21st September, 2010 KSR