03/ \W/ WRIT PETITION (S) NO. S$LCA OF 2010 PETITIONER : W {qx RESPONDENTS : WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I $§Z§§M‘§ $3 G ilip Kumar ’Waren, S/o Chotelal Wareh, aged about 25 years, presently posted as Constable (No.352), Janjgir, District Janjgir—Champa (CG). f Attached in Base Camp, Sitagaon, District Rajnandgaon (CG. Versus 1."/State of Chhattisgarh,‘ Through the Secretary, Department of Home, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 2. r’Director‘ General of Police, Police Headquarters, Chhattisgarh, Rajpur (CG). 3./Inspector General of Police, Raipur Range, District Rajpur (CG). IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR { ) (V, 4. Superintendent of Police, Rajnandgaon (CG). 5. Superintendent of Police, Janjgir~Charnpa (CG). has been attached for temporazf Nawagarh, District Janjgir to Ba: even after expiry of the said perioc Cotinsel for the petiticner s this representation before the responc and in turn the said respondent same expeditiously, in accordance permitted to withdraw State counsel submits that wouid be considered in accorda order would be passed as expeditii Accordingly, the petitione petition with the aforesaid liberty such representation by the peti Within a period of one month fro! order, it is expected form the autl considering all the factual ant expeditiously as possible preferabl It is made clear that this C on merits of the case and the aut} r' period of four months from RS. ie Camp Maria, district Raipur but , he has not been relieved. Jbmits that at this stage, he may be liberty to make ent N02 raising all his grievances No.2 may be directed to decide the with law. the representation of the petitioner ice with law and the appropriate Jusly as possible. r is permitted to withdraw this . In the eventuality of making any :ioner before the respondent No.2 1 the date of receipt of copy of this iority concerned to decide the same i legal aspects of the case as y within a period of two months. curt has not expressed any opinion lority concerned would be at liberty petition with to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. /’/sa/i Pritinker D‘w f aker Judge swim (We) SB ‘: HON’BLE MR. JU$TICE P INKER DIWAKER 07.10.2010 Shm‘ H.S.Patel, counsel far :he patitioner, Shri Vivek Shanna, PL. for th€ State, Grievance of the petitions! in the present petition is that