CWP No.14174 of 2009 --1-- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.14174 of 2009 Date of decision : 9.4.2010 Harjinder Kumar and another ...Petitioners Versus Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd. and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL **** Present: Mr. M K Sangwan, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sudhir Kumar Hooda, Advocate, for the respondents. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) By way of the present writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to treat them at par with their juniors for the purpose of grant of pensionary benefits by giving them the deemed date of appointment with effect from the date, their juniors were appointed. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the relief claimed by the petitioners in the instant writ petition has already been granted to them by treating them at par with their juniors and, therefore, the writ petition may be disposed of accordingly. However, CWP No.14174 of 2009 --2-- learned counsel for the petitioners states that for the consequential relief flowing from the grant of aforesaid relief, i.e. fixing of pay, arrears of pay, etc., the petitioners may be allowed to make a representation to the respondents and the respondents be directed to decide the same in a given time-frame. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. However, a liberty is granted to the petitioners to make a representation for the consequential reliefs as stated above. In case, such a representation is made, the same shall be decided by the respondents by passing a speaking order expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of its filing. April 9, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) atulsethi JUDGE