IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32722 of 2008 BHARAT SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 6.1.2009 Heard Mr. Arun Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. The case is under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code in respect of loot of a motor-cycle and a cellular phone set from the possession of the informant. The cellular phone set is said to be recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Paragraph-31 of the case diary indicates that there were calls made from that cellular phone on to the phone of the witness examined in that paragraph and as per his statement it could be the son of the petitioner who could be making calls. The contention is that there were no efforts to ascertain whether it was this petitioner who had participated in the commission of the offence or it was his son. Let petitioner, namely, Bharat Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in Saraiya P.S. case no.116 of 2008. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )