THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.4959 of 2008 Dated 27th June, 2011 Between: Kasi Reddy Suryanarayana Reddy …Petitioner And The Proddutur Municipality rep.by its Commissioner, Proddatur, Kadapa District and another …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mrs.Hima Bindu Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri Palle Nageswara Rao Counsel for respondent No.2: Sri V.Srinivas The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent No.1 in taking appropriate action for demolition of the building raised by respondent No.2 in deviation of the sanctioned plan. At the hearing, Sri V.Srinivas, learned counsel for respondent No.2, stated that his client’s application for regularisation of the constructions made in deviation of the sanctioned plan is pending before respondent No.1. This submission of the learned counsel is not disputed by Smt.V.Hima Bindu, learned counsel, representing Sri P.Veera Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner. Inasmuch as respondent No.2’s application for regularisation is pending, no mandamus can be issued at this stage for demolition of the structure raised contrary to the sanctioned plan. Respondent No.1 is, however, directed to dispose of the application of respondent No.2, if any, pending within a period of two months from today in accordance with law. Subject to the result of such disposal, respondent No.1 shall take appropriate action. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.6429 of 2008 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 27th June, 2011 VGB