IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.535 of 2010 1. SUNIL KUMAR @ SINGH 2. PANKAN SINGH @ PANKAN KUMAR @ PINKU @ PINKU SINGH BOTH SONS OF SUKHDEO SINGH @ SUKHO SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 18.01.2010 Informant has appeared through counsel who has filed vakalatnama, which has been kept on record. 2. Heard the counsel for the petitioners, the State and the informant. 3. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. 4. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners and the informant are close relation and there is a proceeding under Section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code pending between them and there is no specific overt act against the petitioners, who have fair antecedent, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Barhiya P.S. Case No. 91 of 2009 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, on the conditions (i) that one 2 of the bailors will be a close relative of each of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and (ii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he/they fail(s) to do so on two given dates and delay(s) the trial in any manner then his/their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)