CRM-M No.14446 of 2009 Bhagi Devi vs. State of Haryana Present: Mr. Jitender Dhanda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.S.Arya, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Sunil Shara, Advocate for the complainant. **** On 04.12.2009, the following order was passed: “This is a petition filed under Section 439 for grant of regular bail on behalf of the mother-in-law who is in custody since 08.02.2009. Without going into the merits of the bail application at this stage, I am told that the case is now fixed for 17.12.2009 for the prosecution evidence and it is the fourth date for evidence. I deem it appropriate to adjourn this case after 17.12.2009 with the direction to the learned counsel for the complainant to ensure that the testimony of the main witnesses be recorded on 17.12.2009. Prayer for bail shall be considered on the next date of hearing. Adjourned to 23.12.2009.” Learned state counsel has stated that six witnesses were examined and the matter is now fixed for 15.01.2010 to consider the application filed under Section 319 of Cr.PC by the public prosecutor. Considering the fact that the petitioner has now been in custody for 10½ months and there is the possibility of the trial being derailed because of the application under Section CRM-M No.14446 of 2009 -2- 319 of Cr.PC, I deem it appropriate to grant regular bail to the petitioner to the satisfaction of CJM, Hisar. Consequently, this petition is allowed. December 23, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE