instruction stringclasses 61
values | output stringlengths 1 80.4k |
|---|---|
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 3019 of 2001 Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and Others... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2695 of 2001 (Old No. 24762 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1477 of 2001 (Old No. 20185 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 1946 (S/S) of 2001 Old no. 14792/99 Hon’bel Rajesh Tandon J. The writ petition is allowed. Order passed in writ petition No. 3610 (SS) of 2001. Rajesh Tandon, J. 29-6-2004 M.K. |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1548 of 2001 (Old No. 11235 of 2000) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2064 of 2001 (Old No. 37055 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. Admit. Heard leaned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, ... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | A.O. No. 370 of 2001 (Old No. 418 of 1991) Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Parties have entered into compromise in Lok Adalat. Terms have been endorsed on the leaf. The Compromise is verified by District Judge, Rudrapurayag. Appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise. (P.C.Verma,A.C.J.) (M.M. Ghil... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1793 of 2001 (Old No. 24803 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petitio... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 2794 (S/S) of 2001 (Old No. 8515 of 1993) Aadesh Kumar S/o Mahaveer Singh ---- Petitioner Vs. State of U.P. And another --- Respondents. AND Writ Petition NO. 5009 (S/S) 2001 Smt. Radha Devi W/o Jagdish Saran ---- Petitioner Vs. State of U.P. And another --... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL (Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting) (Chapter VIII Rule 32 (2)(b) Description of the case. W.P. No. 924 of 2001 (SS) Bijbeer Singh & 3 others vs. Union of India Approved for reporting. _______________________ Not approved for reporting Date of decision.... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS 3451 of 2001 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others v... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2074 of 2001 (Old No. 40497 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1551 of 2001 (Old No. 11239 of 2000) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1585 of 2001 (Old No. 24092 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 4445 (S/S) of 2001 Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Writ petition is disposed of. For orders, see our order of date passed on separate sheet in writ petition No. 4446 of 2001 (S/S). Sd/- Dt. 25.03.2004. G |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1877 of 2001 (Old No. 40963 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petitio... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | Writ Petition No. 568 of 2002 (M/B) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard Sri Tanveer Alam Khan, learned counsel fro the petitioner. The petitioner has appeared in the entrance test of Bachelor of Law 1st year admission for the year 2002- 2003 and by way of interim order dated 24.10.2002, she got provisio... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2479 of 2001 (Old No. 24767 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2019 of 2001 (Old No. 12559 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petitio... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2062 of 2001 (Old No. 37060 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 6004 (SS) of 2001 W.P. No. 24972 of 1999 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon J. The writ petition is allowed. Order passed in writ petition No. 3610 (SS) of 2001. Sd/- 29-6-2004 M.K. |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2076 of 2001 (Old No. 37682 of 1995) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2057 of 2001 (Old No. 37067 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2690 of 2001 (Old No. 24959 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 199... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1605 of 2001 (Old No. 11527 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petitio... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS NO. 3453 OF 2001 Hon'ble P.C.Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and other... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | HIGH COURT OF UTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1104 (MS) of 2001 (Old No. 21038/1989) State of U.P. …… Petitioner VS Tibbitian Sayinkt Shakari Krishi Samiti Ltd.and others. …..Respondents Dated:- Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon J. The writ petition arises out of the proceedings for Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings ... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1575 of 2001 (Old No. 20086 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1000 (MS) of 2001 (Old No. 17762/1999) Prem Lal Verma …… Petitioners Vs State of U.P. and others ……. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner Sh. B.D. Upadhyay Standing Counsel for the respondents. Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon J. Heard Sh. B.D. Upadhyay learned counsel for... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1606 of 2001 (Old No. 11536 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petitio... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 3993 (S/S) of 2001 Old no. 44730/99 Hon’bel Rajesh Tandon J. The writ petition is allowed. Order passed in writ petition No. 3610 (SS) of 2001. (Rajesh Tandon J.) 29-6-2004 M.K. |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 3980 (SS) of 2001 Old No. 36741 of 1999 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon J. The writ petition is allowed. Order passed in writ petition No. 3610 (SS) of 2001. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) 29-6-2004 M.K. |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 756 of 2001 (M/S) (Old No. 33143/1996) Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Writ petition is allowed. For order see my order of date in writ petition No. 4703 (S/S) of 2001. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) Dt. 24.02.2004 |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1631 of 2001 (Old No. 20066 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | F.A. No. 458 of 2001 (Old No. 652/2000) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. For order, see our order of date passed on the separate sheet in F.A. No.243 of 2001. (B.S.V., J.) (P.C.V., J.) 20-09-2004 SPA |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 4547 (S/S) of 2001 Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Writ petition is disposed of. For orders, see our order of date passed on separate sheet in writ petition No. 4446 of 2001 (S/S). Sd/- Dt. 25.03.2004. G |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 4455 of 01 (S/S) Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Writ petition is disposed of. For orders, see our order of date passed on separate sheet in writ petition No. 4446 of 2001 (S/S). Sd/- Dt. 25.03.2004. G |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 5453 of 2001 (Old No. 229 of 1996) Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, ... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 6003/2001 Old No. 24710/99 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. The writ petition is allowed. Order passed in writ petition No. 3610 (SS) of 2001. Sd/- 29-6-2004 M.K. |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 4482 of 2001 (SS) Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Irshad Hussain, J. For orders see our order of date kept in writ petition no. 4446(S/S) of 2001. Sd/- Dt. 3.6.2003 A |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2500 of 2001 (Old No. 24696 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 199... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 5334 of 2001 (Old No. 32924 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Appeal From Order No. 754 of 2001(Defective) (Old No. 303/1994) New India Assurance Company Limited, Haldwani ……………….. Appellant Versus Govind Lal Verma & others ………………… Respondents Mr. R.B. Agarwal, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned counsel for the ... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2265 of 2001 (OLD No. 14830 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 199... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. Criminal Appeal No. 1121 of 2001 Old No. 3100 of 1986 Court No.3 State of U.P. ……..Appellant. Versus Bhupendra Singh and two others …..Respondents. Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 5-2-1986 passed by the then Sessions Judge P... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL (1) First Appeal No. 113 of 2001 Murari Lal ………………….. Appellant Versus The Collector, Dehradun and others ……………………. Respondents. ………….. (2) First Appeal No. 09 of 2001 Udai Raj ………………….. Appellant Versus The Collector, Dehradun and others ……………………. Respondents. ………….. (3) Fi... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 508 (S/S) of 2001 Old No. 32647 of 2000 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon J. The writ petition is allowed. Order passed in writ petition No. 3610 (SS) of 2001. 29-6-2004 Sd/- M.K |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1580 of 2001 (Old No. 20107 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2032 of 2001 (Old No. 20089 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2069 of 2001 (Old No. 37072 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 5917 of 2001 (S/S) Old no. 41922/97 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon J. The writ petition is allowed. Order passed in writ petition No. 3610 (SS) of 2001. 29-6-2004 Sd/- M.K |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 506 (S/S) of 2001 Old no. 32652/2000 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon J. The writ petition is allowed. Order passed in writ petition No. 3610 (SS) of 2001. 29-6-2004 Sd/- M.K |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2694 of 2001 (Old No. 24655 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | F.A. No. 711 of 2001 (Old No. 668/1984) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. For order, see our order of date passed on the separate sheet in F.A. No.699 of 2001. (B.S.V., J.) (P.C.V., J.) 03-09-2004 SPA |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2474 of 2001 (Old No. 24976 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 199... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2068 of 2001 (Old No. 37071 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1578 of 2001 (Old No. 20100 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPMS No. 3350 of 2001 (Old No. 15969 of 1997) Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J. Heard Sri Manoj Tewari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Gopal Narain, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. Both the learned counsel for the parties agree that legally the writ petition No.3350 (M/S) of 2001 (Old No. 15969 of 1997) is lia... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 5081/2001 Old no. 3087/99 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. The writ petition is allowed. Order passed in writ petition No. 3610 (SS) of 2001. Sd/- 29-06-2004 M.K |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1964 of 2001 (Old No. 37068 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petitio... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 7311 (S/S) 2001 Old No. 39798 of 2000 Bhasker Joshi S/o Sri Prayag Dutt Joshi, R/o Village Hichauri, Post Office, Kapkot, District Bageshwar. ……..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh through, The collector, Bageshwar, And three others. ……..Respondents. Sri C... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | Writ Petition No. 315 (SB) of 2001 Old No. 35959 of 1998 Hon. A.A. Desai, C.J. Hon., M. C. JainJ. None for the petitioner. Sri S.P. Agarwal Advocate appears for the respondent. Hence dismissed. (A.A. Desai, C.J.) (M. C. Jain, J.) Dt. 17.03.2001 |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | AO_587_2001 (Old No. 78-D of 1997) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Appeal is dismissed. For order, see our order of date passed on the separate sheet kept on A.O.No.1362 of 2001. (P.C. Verma, J.) (B.S. Verma, J.) 21.08.2004 P.Singh |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1571 of 2001 (Old No. 20064 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | IN HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 6678 (S/S) 2001 (Old No. 16478 of 1993) Triloki Nath ---Petitioner Vs. State of U.P. And others. ---Respondents. Hon’ble P.C. Verma. J. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay salary... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS 112 of 2000 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others ve... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1554 of 2001 (Old No. 11243 of 2000) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1629 of 2001 (Old No. 19978 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petitio... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2495 of 2001 (Old No. 24656 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 199... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | A.O No. 318 of 2001 (Old No. 1038 of 1999) Hon. Rajesh Tadnon J. The appeal is dismissed. Order passed in A.O. No. 316 of 2001. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) 12.8.2004 |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2865 of 2001 (Old No. 24982 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2075 of 2001 (Old No. 37161 of 1995) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1874 of 2001 (Old No. 40749 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petitio... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2017 of 2001 (Old No. 11586 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petitio... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 6006 (S/S) of 2001 Old no. 24965/99 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon J. The writ petition is allowed. Order passed in writ petition No. 3610 (SS) of 2001. Sd/- 29-6-2004 M.K |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2061 of 2001 (Old No. 37061 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 6998 (S/S)01: (Old No. 38320 of 1992) Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Case called out. No one is present either for the petitioner or for the respondents, despite called twice. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 09.09.2005: Sd/- NCM: |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS 116 of 2000 Hon'ble P.C. Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others ve... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2493 of 2001 (Old No. 24672 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 199... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1552 of 2001 (Old No. 11240 of 2000) Hon’ble P.C. Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1632 of 2001 (Old No. 20070 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petitio... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 5518 (SS) of 2001 Old no. 24753/99 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. The writ petition is allowed. Order passed in writ petition No. 3610 (SS) of 2001. 29-6-2004 Sd/- M.K. |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1700 of 2001 (Old No. 40794 of 1997) Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petitio... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1799 of 2001 (Old No. 25311s of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petiti... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2697 of 2001 (Old No. 24675 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 2241 (S/S) of 2001 Old no. 25159/99 Hon’bel Rajesh Tandon J. The writ petition is allowed. Order passed in writ petition No. 3610 (SS) of 2001. (Rajesh Tandon J.) 29-6-2004 M.K. |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1703 of 2001 (Old No. 42174 of 1997) Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petitio... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Appeal From Order No. 755 of 2001 (Old No. 302 of 1994) New India Assurance Company Limited, Haldwani …………..…….….. Appellant Versus Smt. Kiran Shukla & others …………….…… Respondents Mr. R.B. Agarwal, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned counsel for the re... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1619 of 2001 (Old No. 20113 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petitio... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 6338/2001 Old No. 16722/2000 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. The writ petition is allowed. Order passed in writ petition No. 3610 (SS) of 2001. Sd/- 29-6-2004 M.K. |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P.No. 9-TA/2000 Old No. 1170/97 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. The writ petition is allowed. Order passed in writ petition No. 3610 (SS) of 2001. Sd/- 29-6-2004 M.K |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. (Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting.) (Chapter VIII Rule 32 (2) (b) Description of the Case. Criminal Appeal No. 27 of 2001 Rajendra Singh S/o Sri Kamal Singh …Appellant Versus State …Opposite parties Approved for reporting. __________________ Not appr... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS 3419 of 2001 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others v... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 4135 of 2001 (Old No. 11529 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 1797 of 2001 (Old No. 25140 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wage employee in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 1998, State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned counsel for the petitio... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 6005 (SS) of 2001 Old no. 24968/99 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. The writ petition is allowed. Order passed in writ petition No. 3610 (SS) of 2001. 29-6-2004 Sd/- M.K. |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 6287 of 2001 (S/S) Old No. 38681 of 1999 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. The writ petition is allowed. Order passed in writ petition No. 3610 (SS) of 2001 Sd/- 29-6-2004 M.K. |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | W.P. No. 507 (SS) of 2001 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon J. The writ petition is allowed. Order passed in writ petition No. 3610 (SS) of 2001. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) 29-6-2004 M.K. |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | WPSS No. 2025 of 2001 (OLD No. 14807 of 1999) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Admit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner claims himself to be the daily wages employee in the Forest Department and covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3634 of 199... |
Provide the transcript and legal facts of this Indian High Court judgment from 1950. | F.A. No. 1028 of 2001 (Old No. 650/2000) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. For order, see our order of date passed on the separate sheet in F.A. No.243 of 2001. (B.S.V., J.) (P.C.V., J.) 20-09-2004 SPA |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 126