1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA NO.1939 OF 2006 IN FAST NO.3594/2006 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders Mr. V.D.Sonawane, Adv., for applicant. Mr.K.D.Chaware, Adv., for respondent. ... CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: June 11 th, 2009 1. Heard both the Counsel. There is delay of 157 days in causing to file the appeal by the E.S.I. Corporation, Pune. Counsel representing the respondent says, the official procedure in filing the appeal by itself could not be a ground to condone the delay. 2. The judgment under challenge is dt.13 th June, 2005, of which certified copy was collected on 25 th July, 2005. Basically as per the 2 calculation the delay could have been of 76 days. After the certified copy was received, it was forwarded to the Regional Office at Lower Parel, Panchdeep Bhavan on 12.8.2005 and the Legal Department of the said Regional Office placed the papers along with the opinion of Advocate before the Regional Director for obtaining necessary permission. The permission was granted on 8 th Sept.,2005 and, thereafter, the papers were sent to the Advocate concerned for preferring appeal. The delay is properly explained. It is condoned. Application allowed on costs of Rs.500/- to be paid within 30 days. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/office/ca1939-06