^-\ H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Coram:- Hon'bSe Shri Dhirendra Mishra & Hon'ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar,_AJ ADDellant Petltioner Respondents Writ ADpeal No.364/2009 Vidya Dhar Mehar, S/o Shri Bai Bihari Mehar, aged about 52 years, Occupation Service, C/o Krishna Chand Mehar, Naya Kostapara, Turkapara, Raigarh M.P. (Now CG) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through The Secretary, Economic and Statistics, Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopai (CG) 2. The Secretary, M.P. Junior Service Selection Board, through the Secretary, General Admjnlstration Mantralaya, Bhopai M.P. 3. The Secretary, General Administration, Mantralaya, Bhopal M.P. 4. The Director, Economic and Statistics, Vindhyachai Bhawan, Bhopal M.P. ARD8al_ under Section 2 (1) of the Chhattlsaarh Hiah Court (Appeai to Dlvislon BenchlAGt*_2006 Present: Shri Rakesh Pandey, counse! for the appeliant. Shri Aiok Bakshi, G.A. forthe State. Oral Order (Passed on 7th of j^ecember, 2009) Per Dhlrendra Mishra. J:- This writ appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 22nd of September, 2009 passed in W.P.(S) No.1905/2005, whereby the appellant's petition for seeking direction to the respondents for conducting the interview of the appeiiant has been dismissed. .^\. \..."^ ^^.%^^^ ^•z- (2) Learned counsei for the appe!lant submits that the grievance of the appellant herein is that the interview was conducted by a Committee, which was not authorized as per ruies and therefore, the whoie recruitment process stands vitiated and secondiy that before holding interview, no post was created. (3) From perusai of the impugned order, it appears that the Board which was competent to conduct interview for recruitrnent was discontinued and in these circumstances, Mandal held the interviev^. in this case, the appellant has participated in the interview without any objection and therefore, the appeilant cannot be permitted to impugn the recruitment process on the ground that the interview Committee had no jurisdiction under the rules. Priya (4) We are in agreement with the finding of the iearned singie Judge. There is no substance in this appea!, which deserves to be and is accordingly dismissed. —— Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge