IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.117 of 2010 Decided on : July 16, 2010 Yogesh Sethi and others …Petitioners Versus Sangeeta Rana and others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner : Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. K.D. Sood, Advocate. Surjit Singh, J. (Oral) Heard and gone through the record. 2. Petition is directed against the order, dated 13.1.2010, of learned trial Court, by which application for summoning the witnesses, named in the list, attached with the application, has been dismissed. 3. It is stated in the reply that defendants-petitioners have been afforded opportunity to adduce their evidence, despite dismissal of the said application and now the case is listed for 26.7.2010. According to learned counsel for the respondents, the witnesses are not being summoned because of the stay granted by this Court on 7.5.2010 in this petition. 4. In view of the above stated position, petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court that list of witnesses submitted by the defendants shall be taken to have been submitted on time and the witnesses named therein shall be summoned. …2… 5. Parties are directed to appear before the Trial Court on 26th July, 2010. CMP No.315/2010 In view of the disposal of the main petition, stay order granted on 7.5.2010, stands vacated. Application stands disposed of. July 16, 2010 (ss) (Surjit Singh), J