IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 6687 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision: 10.2.2010 Ram Kishan ....Petitioner Versus Ram Chander and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. AjayJain, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL, J The challenge in the present petition is to the order passed by learned Court below whereby the objections filed by respondent No. 3 in execution filed by the petitioner to the judgment and decree passed in favour of Palia alias Richpal, were allowed. It is a case in which Palia alias Richpal filed a suit for possession by way of specific performance which was decreed in his favour and against respondent No. 2. During the pendency of appeal Palia alias Richpal died. Hari Ram claimed inheritance on the basis of Will executed by Palia alias Richpal in his favour whereas petitioner, respondents No.1 and 4 claimed inheritance on the basis of natural succession. In another litigation between the parties, where the Will executed by Palia alias Richpal in favour of respondent No.3 was under challenge, the matter in dispute was compromised and further the validity of the Will was also upheld. Meaning thereby that Hari Ram respondent No.3 is to inherit the property or the rights existing in favour of deceased Palia alias Richpal. The execution of the decree passed in favour of Palia alias Rachipal filed by Ram Kishan, petitioner, on the basis of natural succession had no merits considering the fact that the Will regarding the property of deceased Palia alias Richpal and his other rights in favour of respondent No. 3 had been upheld up to this Court. Considering the aforesaid fact, the objections filed by respondent No. 3 in execution of decree passed in favour of deceased Palia alias Richpal on the basis of natural succession were rightly accepted and the impugned order does not call for any interference by this Court. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 10.2.2010 JUDGE Reema