IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.Rev. (T) No. 87 of 2008 Decided on: 29.10.2010 H.P. Tourism Development Corporation …Petitioner. Versus Makiyat Singh Pathania …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : It is jointly represented by learned counsel for the parties that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to the intervening developments. More particularly, the inquiry stands concluded. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed having become infructuous. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 29, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?