MW @ BEFORE THE HQN’BLE HIGH COUgT OF CHHA'JI‘TISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION [Gama 3 :‘gE o‘F 2019 PE’I‘ITIONER iz- Mrs. ‘Anupee Bai w/o Parsadi La1‘ Pardhi; aged about 27 years; Occupation — ‘ Cultivation, Resident of Bahera — Kusmi, Police station- Bometara,‘ District: ' Durg (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS :—/1. State of Chhatt1sgarh Through —’ Secretaly, Department“ of Home, D.K.S. Building, Raipufj District Raipur (C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer Police, Police Station— Bemetarag District: Durg (C.G.). Incharge OffiCer Police, Police station— i Bemetara, District: Durg (C.G.) wm'r PE'rr'rIoN UNDER ARTICLCE: 226 OF THE mNS'llriTUTION OF INmA Fom ISSUAECE OF vurm’r, wRI'r or MANDAMUS To GIVE PROTECTION, . WRIT 0F»? CERTIokARI To Do INVESTIGATIbN. @E @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ('Cr.) N0. 3988 of2010 PETITIONER : Mrs. Anupee Bai. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chllattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETTI‘ION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUIION OF INDIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K.- Aam’Imtri. J. Present: Shri Sudhir Venna, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri AV. Sln‘idhar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL) (Passed (m 30 ' day of July? 2010) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitiener submits that the facts ofthe instan: case is squarely covered by a decision of Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu v. Stage 0f U.P. & others]. Thus, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to tile appropn'ate complaint under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for shaft ‘the Cr.P.C. ’) before the Magistrate. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no obj ection. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the afmestatgd Ebel‘ty. if so advised. rfAi.fAi .. , sd/_ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge