IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI FRIDAY, THE 23RD OCTOBER 2009 / 1ST KARTHIKA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 18 of 2008(Y) ---------------------------- OP.387/2006 of FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT: --------------- SASIDHARAN, S/O RAMAN, KATTAKALATHIL, KIZHUR DESOM, MADEMBA AMSOM, ELEDATH, KIZHUR P.O., OTTAPPALAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.A.R.GANGADAS RESPONDENT/PETITIONER ------------------------- SINITHA, D/O SIVARAMAN @ APPUNNI, SANTHIPUIRATH VEEDU, KURUVATHOOR DESOM, KURUVATHOOR P.O., VALLAPPUZHA AMSOM, OTTAPPALAM TALUK. ADV. SRI.VINOD RAVINDRANATH SRI.P.K.MOHANAN(PALAKKAD) THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. * * * * * * * * * * * * * C.M.Appl.No.54 of 2008 in Mat.Appeal No.18 of 2008 and Mat.Appeal No.18 of 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of October 2009 O R D E R & J U D G M E N T Basant,J This C.M.Application is to condone the delay of 26 days in filing a Mat.Appeal which in turn is directed against an ex parte decree granting divorce. The learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner now submits that the appellant does not want to pursue the matter any further as both the spouses have now been re-married. In these circumstances, this C.M.Application and the Mat.Appeal may be dismissed as not pressed, submits the learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner. 2. Request accepted. The C.M.Application and Mat.Appeal are dismissed as not pressed. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge W.P.Crl/Mat.Appeal No. 2 W.P.Crl/Mat.Appeal No. 3 W.P.Crl/Mat.Appeal No. 4 R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. .No. of 200 ORDER/JUDGMENT 29/07/2009