IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2011 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 13916 of 2010(L) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- A.C.SAINUDHEEN HAJI, S/O.PAREEKKUTTY, AMBALATH VEETTIL CHINGANATH HOUSE, THIRUVATHRA P.O., CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN 680 516. BY ADVS. SRI.T.K.AJITH KUMAR, SRI.P.VINODKUMAR. RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHAVAKKAD POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. C.GOPAPRATHAPAN, S/O.APPU, CHOZHEERAKATH HOUSE, THIRUVATHRA P.O., CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. CHAVAKKAD MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CHAVAKKAD P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. JAIBY PAUL R3 BY SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE, BY ADV. SRI.S.SUJIN,SC,CHAVAKKAD MUNICIPALITY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/03/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.13916/2010 L APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION DTD. 25/02/2010. P2: COPY OF THE PERMISSION LETTER DTD. 28/02/2010. P3: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD. 16/04/2010. P4: COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD. 16/04/2010. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- WPC No.13916 of 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd March, 2011 JUDGMENT Basant, J. The petitioner had come to this Court with this petition claiming issue of directions to respondent No.1 to afford police protection to the petitioner for the unobstructed carrying on of the work of construction of a canal. According to the petitioner, he had undertaken the work of construction of a canal. Vehicles had to come to the site. For this purpose, mud had to be removed. Objections were raised by respondent No.2 against such removal of mud. Police are guilty of inaction. With these allegations, the petitioner came before this Court. 2. This petition was filed on 25.4.2010. Service is complete. There is no appearance for the second respondent. On 4.5.2010, the Bench which dealt with the matter directed the first respondent to enquire into the allegations in Ext.P3 complaint and take necessary action. 3. The learned Government Pleader submits that the WPC No.13916/2010 2 first respondent had taken necessary action. The canal construction has been completed and nothing survives in this petition now, submits the learned Government Pleader. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the canal construction has been completed now. We are of the opinion that the other disputes need not be gone into in this writ petition. 5. In these circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed as unnecessary now. R.BASANT JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE css/