IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.580 OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant Vs. Vilas Ramchandra Bhagat and ors. ..Respondents. Ms.A.T.Jhaveri, APP for applicant State. Mr.Ganesh Gole, Advocate for respondent no.1. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATE : 2 nd May, 200 9. P.C. 1 Heard learned APP for applicant – State. The challenge in this Revision Application is to the order dated 15th July, 2008. The Additional Sessions Judge has granted anticipatory bail in favour of respondents. 2 The respondents have been charged for offence punishable under Sections 143,147,148,149,326,452,506 (2) of Indian Penal Code as well as 135 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951. The anticipatory bail granted by the impugned order is subject to condition of the respondents attending concerned police station on every Monday and Friday between 11:00 a.m. To 2:00 p.m. The anticipatory bail has been granted subject to condition that respondents will cooperate with the investigation. The impugned order directs that benefit of anticipatory bail will be available to the respondents only till the Charge Sheet is filed and thereafter, respondents will have to apply for regular bail. 3 The impugned order has been passed on 15th July, 2008. The challenge to the said order is on merits. It is not case of the applicant that respondents have committed breach of any of the terms and conditions on which the anticipatory bail was granted. 4 Considering the nature of offence alleged against the respondents and considering the fact that impugned order is passed on 15th July, 2008 by imposing certain conditions referred above, no case is made out to interfere with impugned order. Revision Application is accordingly dismissed. [A.S.OKA, J.] rev580-08