IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3567 of 2008 MAULESHWAR PRASAD, SON OF LATE DAROGA LAL, RESIDENT OF ROAD NO. 9B, RAJIV NAGAR, P.S. RAJIV NAGAR, DISTRICT PATNA. ---- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE JOINT SECRETARY-CUM-CHIEF VIGILANCE OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE, BIHAR, PATNA. ---- RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 8.4.2011 Mr. Satya Prakash, junior to Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw this writ application in view of the statements made in paragraph 12 of the counter affidavit which are as follows: “That on the basis of prima facie proved charges the petitioner was asked explanation on second show cause minor punishment under rule 19’22(9’) of Bihar Government Servant (Classification, Control & Appeals) Rule, 2005 vide letter no. 6049 dated 10.12.2007 the petitioner did not submit his explanation and thus the department had taken a decision vide Resolution No. 1119 dated 12.3.2008. A copy of the Resolution Memo No. 1119 dated 12.3.2009. The petitioner has not been given any punishment simply he has been directed to deposit the out standing loan amount against him within 15 days.” In view of the aforesaid facts, this writ application is allowed to be withdrawn. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)