IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32161 of 2009 NEEL KAMAL ANAND Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 13/11/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Though the allegation levelled against the petitioner is for demand of dowry by the family members and causing cruelty but it is admitted that the petitioner as well as the Complainant are divorcee rather it was their second marriage. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that before filing of this Complaint petition, a divorce case was filed on behalf of the petitioner making allegation that the Complainant was not allowing to have matrimonial relation with her. It is submitted that petitioner’s first wife also before her divorce had filed a complaint case under Section 498A that goes to show that both husband and wife are not ready to accept their status of wife and husband and making trouble for each other which never can be made a ground for refusal of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with Complaint case No. 909 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. S.Ali (Mandhata Singh, J.)