CWP No.3606 of 2011.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.3606 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.02.2011 **** Gurpal Singh Bains . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Anil Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner is aggrieved by the posting of respondents No.3 and 4 as SHOs of the Police Station. (2). He contends that the above-stated positing is contrary to Section 13(2)(i) of the Punjab Police Act, 2007 as both these respondents are facing prosecution in a criminal complaint filed by him. (3). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the fact that the issue raised by him requires verification of correct facts, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to submit a self-explanatory representation to the Director General of Police, Punjab along with relevant material, who in turn is directed to consider and dispose of the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (4). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. CWP No.3606 of 2011.doc - 2 – 28.02.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge