[ 32se] HIGH COURT FOR TIIE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAI) THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN CRIMINAL R-E!'ISION CASE NO: 925 OF 2009 Betrveen: SYED FAISAL ALI @ SYED FAISAL NAWAB, S/o Sri Syed Sujath Ali. . . . Petitioner AND I . THE STATE OF A.P., Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 2. Smt Reena Sadana, R/O H.No.6-3-629 Anandanagar colony Khairatabad Hyderabad (R2 is impleaded as pdr Court Order dated 28.02.2012 in Crl.Rc.Mp.No.9l4l2010 and in Crl.Rc.No.925l20l9) ...Respondent Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., pralng that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to allow the petition filed under section 22'7 Cr.P.C., by setting-aside the Order passed by the leamed Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad in Crl.M.P.No.1367 of 20O7 in S.C.No.390 of 2007, dated 20.11.07. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit frled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner/ Accused No.9 in SC.No.390 12007 on the file of the metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, Pending disposal of CRLRC 925 of 2009, on the file of the High Court. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and orders of the High Court dated 17.06.2009 made in CrI.R.C.MP. No. 1297 of 2009 in the CRLRC., order dated 09.02.2023 made herein upon hearing the arguments of Sri KHAJA AIJAZUDDIN, Advocate for the Petitioner, Sri Muthyala Murafidhar Additional Public Prosecutor, for the respondent No.1 , Sri C MASTHAN NAIDU, on behalf of Sri N. HARINADH NIDAMANURI, Advocate for the Respondent No.2, the Court made the following. r ORDER: Heard Sri Khaja Aijazuddin, learned counsel, on record, for the Petitioner as , well as Sri C Masthan Naidu, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of CRIRC.MP.NO.1297 OF 2OO9 Sri Harinath Nidamanuri, learned counsel, on record, for the respondent No.2 and Sri Muthyala Muralidhar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State/Respondent No.1, Post this matter under the caption 'for orders' on 24.03.2023. Interim Orders granted earlier are extended till then. //TRUE COPYII SD/- A.V.S. PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR w SECTION OFFICER To, I . THE Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. 2. The Station House Officer, Panjagutta Police station, Hyderabad. 3. One CC to Sri KHAJA AIJAZUDDIN, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court at Hyderabad. [OUT] 5. One CC to SRI. N. HARINADH NIDAMANURI, Advocate IOPUC] 6. One spare copy L Z- IIIGII COURT DR.DNR, J DATED :15.03.2023 POST THIS NIATTER UNDER THE CAPTION'FOR ORDERS'ON 24.03.2023 ORDER .', !.aii- i-\L ct( r$ ( CRLRC.No.925 of 2009 () d \ s $N\\ '7 r\' j o DISi]A1 I EXTENSION OF INTIRIM ORDER I/r /,(< v) \