IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18179 of 2005 Between: D.C.B.N. & N.K. R. Junior College, Guntur rep by its Secretary and Correspondent ..... PETITIONER AND 1The Commissioner of Intermediate Education Andhra Pradesh, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 3The Regional Joint Director of Intermediate Education, Guntur. 4N. Babji Rao S/o. Sudharshanam, Govt. Junior College, R/o. Kanchikacherla, Krishna District 5G. Sanjeeva Reddy S/o. Veera Reddy Govt. Junior College, R/o. Bellamkonda, Guntur District 6D.H. Sankara Rao S/o. Venkatappaiah Govt. Junior College, Uppugudur, Prakasam District 7N. Sri Rami Reddy S/o. Kulinda Reddy Govt. Junior College, Gurajala, Guntur District 8A.R.V. Parabrahmam S/o. Veera Basavacharyulu Govt. Junior College, Mominpet, R.R. District 9P. Mallikarjuna reddy, Govt. Junior College, Paduguralla, Guntur District RR 4to9 impleaded as per court order dt. 5-3-2007 in WPMP 213 of 2007 .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and unconstitutional the proceedings of the 1st Respondent issued in Rc.No. SPl.1 Camp at Guntur/Prakasam/Nellore/Admn. A1/2005 dated 06-8-2005 and issue a consequential direction that the teaching the non-teaching staff of the petitioner institution cannot be transferred as the petitioner has economic strength and pass such other or further order or orders as are deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.V.SITARAMAMURTHY Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : O R D E R : When this writ petition came up for hearing on 06.07.2009, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and therefore, it was directed to be listed on 07.07.2009 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on this day, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:17th July, 2009. cs ..... ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. 2. 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}