S.B.Civil Misc. Appeal No 1237/08 National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Smt. Harsha & ors. 1 S.B.Civil Misc. Appeal No 1237/08 National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Smt. Harsha & ors. Date of Order: 25.9.2008. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Sanjeev Johari for the appellant. ... Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The appellant's contention is that the driving license of the truck driver Baluram was forged and fake driving license. I considered the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the reasons given in the award dated 24.6.2008 passed by the court of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District Judge(Fast Track), Dungarpur camp Sagwada. It appears from the reasons given by the tribunal while deciding issue nos.3 and 5 that the appellant though took a plea of fake license but did not produce any evidence except the oral evidence of its witnesses. A certificate Ex.A. 2 was produced by the appellant but in that, there is only fact mentioned is that the driving license is forged but in that certificate there is no mention of name of driver and the father's name etc. for whom S.B.Civil Misc. Appeal No 1237/08 National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Smt. Harsha & ors. 2 it has been issued. The appellant further did not produce the receipt of Rs.20/- by which the investigator of the appellant- Company may have inspected the record of the RTO or sought the copy of the license. In view of the above reason, there was no reason to hold that the driving license produced from the claimants' side was fake and forged. In view of the above, there is no merit in this appeal. Hence the appeal of the appellant is dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA),J. mlt