IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 23061 OF 2009 Between P.Ranganatham ..... PETITIONER AND The Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams Tirupathi and another .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MS. G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.23061 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that action of respondent No.1-Tirumala Tirupathi Devastanam in not treating the period of suspension of the petitioner from 28.09.2001 to 28.07.2002 as on duty and not extending the other monetary benefits, in pursuance of the order issued by the Government in Memo No.25947/Endts.III/A2/2008-4, dated 16.06.2009, as arbitrary and illegal. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri P.Nageswara Rao, learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents. As seen from the material on record, the petitioner has already made a representation on 02.09.2009 requesting respondent No.1 to treat the period of the suspension as on duty and to grant the other monetary benefits. In the circumstances, it is for respondent No.1 to consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 02.09.2009 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. No order as to costs. __________________ JUSTICE G. ROHINI Date:28.10.2009 Note: Furnish CC within three days B/o.Ivd