IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5006 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 02.09.2009 Surjeet Singh .....Petitioner versus Smt.Rekha Gupta and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sourabh Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The grievance of the petitioner in this revision petition is against the order dated 6.3.2009 passed by the Rent Controller Chandigarh, whereby his application for impleadment as a party- respondent in an eviction petition filed by respondent No.1 against respondent No.2, has been dismissed. The petitioner appears to have moved the aforesaid application in collusion with respondent No.2, claiming himself to be the real and original tenant in the demised premises and further claiming that respondent No.2 was inducted in the demised premises obviously as a sub- tenant by him only. C.R. No.5006 of 2009 (O&M) 2 The Rent Controller has observed that no proof, whatsoever, like rent note, rent receipt or any other document, has been appended by the petitioner alongwith the application for his impleadment as a respondent. It is also not explained as to when did he enter into the possession of the premises or vacated the same. The application is wholly frivolous and an abuse of the process of law, which has rightly been dismissed by the Rent Controller. Moreover, the landlady is master of his case and the petitioner is nobody to dictate him or enforce him to implead as a respondent. No interference in the impugned order is called for by this Court in exercise of the its revisional jurisdiction. Dismissed. 02-09-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE