IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8041 of 2011 TARNI KUMAR SRIVASTVA, s/o late Sri Rajendra Prasad, R/o-Village-Arwal Sipah, P.S.- Arwal, District-Arwal at present posted on the post of Headmaster in the government middle school walidad, Prakhand Kaler, District-Arwal ……Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, 3. The Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, 4. The District Superintendent of Education, District- Arwal, 5. The Block Education Officer, Block Prakhand, District-Arwal, 6. Bimla Kumari, Prakhand Teacher, government middle school, Walidad, Prakhand-Kaler, District- Arwal (Bihar) ……Respondents ……………. For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. S.D. Sanjay, AAG-XII, Mr. R.R. Tiwari, A.C. to AAG-XII …………… 2. 6.5.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead Bimla Kumari as Respondent No.6 in this writ application. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner, who claims to be Headmaster in the 2 Government Middle School Walidad, Prakhand Kaler, District-Arwal, is aggrieved by the conduct of a teacher of the aforesaid school, namely, Bimla Kumari, who has been impleaded as Respondent No.6. Various reasons for such opinion regarding her conduct has been stated in the writ application. It is also submitted that he has recommended for taking disciplinary action against the Respondent No.6 to the different authorities, but no action could be taken till date. It is also pointed out that he has also written a letter to the Respondent No.3, the Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, with regard to the same. In that view of the matter, it is contended that the Respondent No.3 be directed to take a decision on the letter dated 5.10.2009 written to him by the petitioner. A copy of the letter has been appended as part of Annexure-‘5’ to this writ application. Mr. S.D. Sanjay, learned Additional Advocate General-XII, appearing for the State does not object to that. In that view of the matter, this writ application is being disposed of with a direction to the Respondent No.3 to consider the aforesaid letter of the petitioner as contained in 3 Annexure-5 in accordance with law and after issuing necessary notice to all the concerned including the respondent No.6, within three months from the date of receipt or production of a copy of this order. Sanjay-II ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)