REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No. 1304 of 2008 1 .. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No. 1304 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision : April 24, 2008 Nirmal Singh and another .. Appellants v. Kuldip Singh and others .. Respondents CORAM : Hon`ble Mr. Justice Pritam Pal Present : Shri N.S.Bawa, Advocate, for the appellants. PRITAM PAL, J. This Regular Second Appeal by plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as “the appellants”) is directed against judgment and decree dated 14.2.2005 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division),Phillaur, whereby a suit declaration and permanent injunction filed in respect of the suit property belonging to Bikar Singh claiming themselves to be owners in possession, was dismissed. Thereafter, the first appeal filed by the appellants was also dismissed vide judgment and decree dated 4.12.2007 passed by learned Additional District Judge (Adhoc) Fast Track Court, Jalandhar. This is how feeling aggrieved, the appellants have come-up in this appeal. After hearing learned counsel for the appellants and going through the impugned judgments and decrees, it is apparent that there are REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No. 1304 of 2008 2 .. concurrent findings of the courts below that the Will dated 20.6.1996 (Ex.D1) executed by Bikar Singh in favour of respondent – Kuldip Singh is valid and genuine and as such, the appellants have nothing to do with the suit property. The above findings of the courts below, in fact, are based upon cogent and convincing evidence and as such, are not perverse or unreasonable. Thus, no interference is called for in the aforesaid findings arrived at by the courts below. Moreso, learned counsel for the appellants could not make out any substantial question of law, for consideration by this Court in this Regular Second Appeal. Hence, this Regular Second Appeal is dismissed in limine. [ PRITAM PAL ] April 24, 2008 JUDGE som