IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.7087 of 2011 Date of decision : 26.4.2011 Jitender Kumar and others ....Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Mr.Inder Pal Goyat, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The petitioners in the earlier round of litigation have also approached this Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India wherein the case of the petitioners for appointment was kept in abeyance and justifiably so because the matter regarding the examinations conducted by the respondents was being inquired into by the Vigilance Department. Both, this Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India had approvingly observed that the State was within its right to keep the appointment in abeyance till the inquiry is concluded. The instant writ petition is filed by making grievance to Annexure P-8 which is probably some material collected by the Vigilance Department during the course of inquiry and the petitioners while zeroing in on their names have stated that the vigilance has not found any discrepancy in the answer-sheets and thus pray for appointment. C.W.P.No.7087 of 2011 -2- I am afraid the petition is an abuse of the process of law. The petitioners without waiting for the outcome of the inquiry and without apprising this Court as to what has transpired in the inquiry have made a reference to some material to substantiate their plea which is without any justification. Further, even though the anxiety of the petitioners to seek appointment may be understandable but to come to this Court at this stage when the inquiry has not been completed and which inquiry has been granted the seal of approval by the Supreme Court, the petitioners without waiting for the outcome of the inquiry have approached this Court unnecessarily. No ground to interfere. Dismissed. 26.4.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss