IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2010 / 12TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 6805 of 2010(A) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- T.S.SWAMINATHAN, AGED 36, S/O.LATE SUBRAMANIAN, THERAYANKODE HOUSE, EZHAKKAD P.O., MUNDUR, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.M.JITHESH MENON RESPONDENT: --------------- THE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED, HDFC HOUSE, NO.29, KAMARAJ ROAD, (NEAR CIRCUIT HOUSE), COIMBATORE-641 018. BY ADV. MR. K.K. CHANDRAN PILLAI, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) 6805 of 2010 ......................................................................... Dated this the 3rd March, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached this Court by filing this Writ Petition apprehending further coercive steps at the hands of the respondent Bank without considering the representation preferred by the petitioner pursuant to Ext. P1 judgment passed by this Court. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the respondent Bank submits that the apprehension expressed from the part of the petitioner is quite wrong and misconceived. However, the fact remains that no such representation was preferred by the petitioner within one month, as specified in Ext.P1 judgment and the respondent was about to take further steps for realisation of the due amount, it is submitted. But in the meanwhile, the representation submitted by the petitioner though belatedly, was received by the respondent Bank and in the said circumstances, W.P.(C) 6805 of 2010 2 without raising any technical objections, the respondent has decided to consider the matter on merits, submits the learned Counsel for the respondent Bank. The learned Counsel further submits that further action will be pursued by the Bank only subject to the orders to be passed in the said representation. In the said circumstances, submission made by the respondent Bank is recorded and the Writ Petition is disposed of as no further orders are warranted in this Writ Petition. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk