IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22930 of 2009 Arbind Rajbanshi, Son of Late Rajendra Rajbanshi, resident of village-Chainpur, P.S- Chabilapur, District-Nalanda. …………Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ………..Opp. Party. ----------- 2/ 17.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The case was instituted under Sections 365/34 of the IPC but later on charge has been framed under Section 364(A)/34 of the IPC. It is stated that father of the informant who is said to have been kidnapped returned after about a week and gave his statement to the police in which he has not named any one. He has claimed that he could identify the persons who had actually kidnapped him. The petitioner is in custody since 27.5.2008 but he was never put on T.I. Parade to enable the victim to identify in respect of involvement of the petitioner in the crime. Considering the fact that petitioner was never put on T.I. Parade and the victim had returned only after about a week and there is no allegation of ransom and petitioner is in custody since 27.5.2008, this application is allowed. Let petitioner Arbind Rajbanshi be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya, in connection with Nimchak Bathani - 2 - P.S. Case No. 3/2003, S.T. No. 144/2009 / 668/2008. Sanjeet/ (J. N. Singh, J.)