IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 1736 of 2009 Between: 1.Smt.Mummaneni Raja Rajeswari W/o.M.Reddaiah R/o.Plot No.68, Brundavan colony Nizampet Road,Kukatpally, Hyderabad 2.Smt.Ravi Manorathnam W/o.R.Ravindra Babu R/o.HIG-51, Bharatnagar colony Moosapet, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONERS AND 1.Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep.by its Deputy Commissioner, Sherilingampally,Hyderabad 2.Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep.by its Commissioner, Tank Bund, Hyderabad 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division Ranga Reddy District 4.Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, rep.by its Vice Chairman, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue appropriate writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent herein in refusing the applications dated 27.9.2008 of the petitioners for building permissions in respect of their house plots bearing Nos.662 and 671 respectively situated at Matrushri Cooperative Housing Building Society Limited, Miyapur village, Serilingampally ,Hyderabad in Sy.No.44/1 as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 1st respondent herein forthwith sanction the building permission to the petitioners herein. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.CHANDRA SHEKHAR Counsel for the Respondents: SMT.KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.1736 of 2009 Order: Questioning the action of the first respondent in refusing applications, dated 27.09.2008, made by the petitioners for building permission in respect of their house plots bearing Nos.662 and 671 in Survey No.44/1 of Matrushri Cooperative Housing Building Society Limited, Miyapur Village, Serilingampally, Hyderbad, this writ petition is filed. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners and admitted to by the learned Standing Counsel for GHMC appearing for the respondent-Corporation that the subject matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court passed in W.P.No.23208 of 2008, dated 23.10.2008, and they agreed to dispose of the writ petition in terms thereof. Hence, following the judgment in W.P.No.23208 of 2008, dated 23.10.2008, this writ petition is disposed of on the same terms, at the admission stage. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 04.02.2009 Note: Office to annex copy of judgment in W.P.No.23208 of 2008, dated 23.10.2008, to this order. (b/o) VGB