BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Third day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14230 of 2011 1 PANCHU 2 MANIMEGALAI 3 PARAMAN 4 PACKIAM ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO1.1,3,6,7 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUMANGALAM TOWN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT IN CRIME NO.591 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.MAHENDRAPATHY Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for offences under Sections 147, 294(b), 341, 323, 355 and 506 (i) I.P.C. in Crime No.591 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police , the petitioners have come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of prosecution, due to election motive, it is stated that the petitioners abused the de-facto complainant and also attacked with wooden stick and caused simple injury. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would deny the above allegations. According to him, this false case has been foisted against the petitioners due to political motive. 4.I have considered the above submissions. 5.Having regard to the nature of offence and the facat that the injury is simple in nature and all other attendant https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners but with conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, on executing separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a lie sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that petitioner Nos.1,2 and 4 shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation and the third petitioners shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks, without fail. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. sd/- 03/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUMANGALAM 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUMANGALAM TOWN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. S.MAHENDRAPATHY Advocate SR.No.38003 rl/6c – 4.11.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14230 of 2011 Date :03/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/