31 0/o 24.03.2011 Present: Mr. Sum it Arora, Proxy Counsel for the petitioners. Mr·. Arvind Gupta, APP for the State with SI Gopinder Nath, P.s.· Partap Nagar. Mr. Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Proxy Counsel for respondent No. "2 With respondent No. 2 in person. + Cd. M.C. Nc. 962/2011 * At the relevant time, petitioners and respondent No. 2 were · living in the same locality. They were known to each other.. On some trivial matter a quarrel took place between them which had led to Tegistration of the present . FIR under Sections 452/342/324/323/34 IPC at Police Station Partap Nagar. With the . intervention of their friends, petitioners· and respondent No. 2 have settled their disputes amicably, inasmuch as they want to maintain harmonious relations in future. Terms of settlement have been recorded in the Compromise Deed dated 22nd January, 2011 as Annexure 'C'. Both the parties shall remain bound by the te:r:ms of the settlement. Respondent No. 2, who is present in the Court and has been identified by the 'Investigating Officer, has no objection in case FIR in question is quashed. Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the parties, m the larger interest FIR No. 59 I 2003 under Sections Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified • 452/342/324/323/34 IPC registered at Police Station Partap·Nagai and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petitiori is disposed of iri the above terms. Dasti. lWAJR.ClHI 24, 20 ll.l rb A.K. 1? A 'll'lHIAK, J'.