1 WP 8133.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 8133 OF 2011 (Pramod Panditrao Shinde VS The State of Maharashtra and ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. D.A. Mane, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, A.G.P. for the respondent-State ... CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 09.01.2012 P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner has filed the present Petition for a direction to the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of Shikshan Sevak. It is the contention of the petitioner that eight (8) seats are vacant and the petitioner can be accommodated on those seats. 3. In the affidavit-in-reply, it is categorically stated that the petitioner was at serial no.2 in the waiting list from the open category. All the candidates from the open category have joined 2 WP 8133.2011 service and that is why the petitioner cannot be accommodated in those posts. Insofar as eight (8) vacant posts are concerned, it is submitted that those vacancies have arisen after the completion of the selection process and as such the petitioner cannot be considered on the same. 4. In view of the categorical statement made in the affidavit-in- reply, no case is made out for interference. Rejected. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M. T. JOSHI, J. ] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]