THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.29340 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the second respondent who had initially directed the third respondent to provide police protection to the petitioner, but had subsequently withdrawn the said order, and had directed the third respondent not to provide police protection. No provision, which confers any power on the Tahsildar to direct the third respondent to withdraw police protection is brought to the notice of this Court. The remedy available to the petitioner against the fourth respondent, who is encroaching on his land, is to file a Civil Suit before the competent Civil Court seeking injunction and, thereafter, if need be, for police protection. Leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the remedy of a Civil Suit before the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction, the Writ Petition is dismissed. However, in the circumstances, without costs. _____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J November 02, 2011 MD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.29340 OF 2011 November 02, 2011 MD