^. ^lIN^S ltt ^^^ ^^...^ y\\^^ .^"-':- w^°' c.^." .•»*'' 1^" c^^^y^-^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. -fl^c) /2010 PETITIONER , Raju Singh Portey, aged about 40 years S/ o- Ram dayal Portey by cast Gond, R/o- Korja, Thana Gourela, Pendra Road District- Bilaspur ( C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. A. 5. The State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary employment and training Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur The Collector, Bilaspur. The Deputy Director, I.T.I, Koni, Bilaspur. The Principal, I.T.I., Koni, Bilaspur. K.K. Shrivastava, Teacher, I.T.1. Koni Bilaspur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTIT-UTION OF INDIA HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT B8LASP WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 7169 OF 2010 Petitipner Raju Singh Portey Versus Respondents The State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTJTUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 08th day of December, 2010) The petitioner has already made a representation to the Chief Minister and other concerned parties. It is well settled that if a statutory representation has been made, a reasonabie time shouid be given to consider and decided the representation. In view of pendency of representation, since reasonable time has already elapsed, the authorities are directed to consider the representation and decide the same in accordance with law on its merit expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petitlon is dismissed with the aforesaid directjon. SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ashok