IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 2ND SEPTEMBER 2010 / 11TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 11033 of 2010(D) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- SUCHITRA, AGED 19, D/O.SURENDRAN, 3RD YEAR B.C.A STUDENT, BASELIOS POULOSE II CATHOLICS COLLEGE PIRAVOM. BY ADVS. SRI.V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR) SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE KIZHAKKAMBALAM RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM REP. BY REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM 3. THE PRINCIPAL, BASELIOS POULOSE II CATHOLICS COLLEGE PIRAVOM. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SVS. WP. NO. 11033/2010 (D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF ORDER DATED 02/12/2009 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC.NO.34726/2009. P2: COPY OF MEMO NO.E1.X1/2010 DATED 22/04/2010 ISSUED BY THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS. P3: COPY OF COMMUNICATION DATED 18/05/2010 ISUED BY THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE SVS. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 11033 of 2010 D ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a BCA student in a College affiliated to the first respondent University. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner presently seeks for a direction to the University to declare the results of the 6th semester BCA examination in which she appeared in April, 2010. According to the petitioner, though she was debarred on a previous occasion, such debarment cannot be a justification for the University to refuse declaration of her results as sought for by her. 3. Even going by the submissions made by the standing counsel for the University, if the examination appeared by the petitioner was after the expiry of the period of debarment, the said debarment, cannot be a reason not to declare the results. 4. The petitioner submits that the period of debarment expired in October 2009. If that be so, the University is bound to declare the result of the petitioner, since the examination in which she appeared was conducted only in April, 2010. WPC.11033/2010 : 2 : 5. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that if the examination in which the petitioner appeared in April, 2010 was subsequent to the expiry of the debarment period, the University shall declare the results of the petitioner. Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment before the second respondent for compliance. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge