IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5573 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE AKSHAY H.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- HEDPARA KISHOREKUMAR R Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 5573 of 1992 MR KS JHAVERI for Petitioner No. 1 MR LR PUJARI, AGP for Respondents No. 1-3 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 4 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE AKSHAY H.MEHTA Date of decision: 22/03/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. The petitioner has approached this Court by filing aforesaid petition seeking following reliefs :- (A) The Honourable Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order quashing and setting aside the order dated 5th August 1992, Annexure - 'E' to the petition and be pleased to direct the respondents to decide the application of the petitioner dated 27th May 1992, which was given by the petitioner as was directed by this Hon'ble Court in Special Civil Application No. 2726 of 1992 and be pleased to further direct the respondents to allow the petitioner for the Fourth Attempt in the examination of the State Pre-Service Training Examination; (B) Pending the final hearing and disposal of this petition, the Honourable Court be pleased to restrain the respondents from terminating the service of the petitioner only on the ground that he has appeared Third Attempt in the examination; 2. Mr. Pujari, Ld. AGP for respondents has placed on record a communication dated 7/3/2002 addressed to the Deputy Director, Sardar Patel State Administration Institute by the Collector, Junagadh alongwith xerox copies of order dated 2/12/1994 issued by the Collector, Junagadh, order dated 26/10/1994 issued by Conservator of Forest, Wild Life Circle, Junagadh, order dated 27/11/2000 issued by the Collector, Junagadh and again order dated 15/10/2001 issued by the Collector, Junagadh. He also makes a statement that in light of this communication and the orders placed on record all the grievances made by the petitioner in this petition stand satisfied. These documents are shown to the learned counsel for the petitioner and he is also satisfied and states that now there is no need to prosecute this petition any further. In view thereof, this petition has now become infructuous and it is being disposed of as having become infructuous with no order as to costs. Accordingly rule is discharged. [ AKSHAY H. MEHTA, J.] * Pansala.