THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.7605 of 2000 ORDER: This Writ petition is filed by the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation through Depot Manager, Ananthapur Depot, challenging the docket order dated 10th March, 2000 passed in E.P. No.18 of 1991 in I.D. No.114 of 1990 on the file of the Chairman-cum- Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ananthapur. 2. The second respondent was removed from the service as a Manager on punishment in the disciplinary proceedings by order dated 27th February, 1982. When he filed appeal, appellant authority has taken a lenient view and modified the punishment and ordered for reinstatement of workman by treating the period of absence from the date of suspension till date of reporting duty as not on duty. He further carried the matter in review, which ended in dismissal. Thereafter, he raised an industrial dispute in I.D. No.114 of 1990. The Industrial Tribunal by its Award dated 18-05-1991 in I.D. No.114 of 1990 directed the petitioner corporation to treat the suspension period as on duty and to reinstate him with all back wages. Though the said award was questioned by the petitioner corporation in Writ Petition No.7805 of 1992, the same ended in dismissal. While it is the case of the petitioner corporation that due amounts have already paid, as per the respondent workman, on account of modification of the punishment by the Industrial Tribunal in its award, further amounts are payable to him. 3. On a perusal of the docket order, which is impugned in the Writ Petition, it shows that the Tribunal without discussing the amounts paid and effect of its modification, simply ordered for implementation of the award. As much as the amounts, payable on account of the modification of the punishment, are in dispute, it is for the parties to file fresh memos indicating the compliance of the award. As no particulars are indicated in the impugned order, the order under challenge dated 10-03-2000 is set side and the matter is remanded to the Labour Court, Ananthapur for fresh consideration of E.P. No.18 of 1991 in I.D. No.114 of 1990 after hearing both parties. It is open for the petitioner as well as the respondent to file fresh calculation memos with regard to payment made i n favour of the respondent in terms of the award of the Industrial Tribunal passed in I.D. No.114 of 1990. 4. The Writ Petition is allowed in part to the extent indicated above. No order as to costs. ____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J. 18th March, 2009. skmr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7605 of 2000 Between: A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by its Depot Manager, Ananthapur Depot. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Labour Court, Rep. by its Presiding Officer, Ananthapur. 2 K.Gangulappa, Rep. by Depot Secretary, A.P.S.R.T.C., Employees Union, ANANTHAPUR. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction particularly in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to and in connection with EP 18/91 in I.D.No.114/90, Dt:10.3.2000 on the file of the Chairman cum Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Ananthapur and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the facts and consequently declare that the Corporation has complied with the award passed in I.D.NO.114/90 DT:18.5.91 to the full satisfaction and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.W.V.S.RAJESWARI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following :