Q5 WWWW anéa m (W) aminéwm' an? Izmiém'is mmwmg‘ ' ’ WWWWWWWA A $Wma I gSigle Bench; Hon‘lm Mr. Jusfic: Dhinndm Mishm) W.F. s No.6418/2008 (Pefifion U/A /227 of Cons'rifufion of India) Em Ram h Chandra Chgudhm'y, S/o Lafe ’ Puru o'H'am Chaudhary, aged about 52 years, R/o Village: Cha‘f'l’igirola, Tahsil: Saraipali, ' DES? c1- Mahasamund (C6) Vs RE5PONDENT$ 1. 5 afe of Chha‘rfisgarh: Through: Secrefar-y: L cal Self Govemmenf & Urban A minisfrm'ion & Developmenf Deparfmen'r, D K.5. Bhawan, Raipur, Disfricf Raipur (CG). e Joinf Direc‘ror, Urban Adminisfra‘rion & D velopmem Depar‘rmem, Chha‘Hisgarh R ipur, Dis'l'r-ich Raipur (CG). é Ndgd‘r- Paiiéhayaf Saraipdii, 1‘n.wg.; C ief Municipal Officer. Saraipali. Disfr-ic‘t: ll samuna {947.} Il‘l‘ \ I 9: Present Mr. P.K Pate}, Advocafe for the p fifianer. Mrs. Smifa Ghai, Panei Lawyer f The Sfa‘i'e. 19.11.2008 Hem'd on admission. By 'ihe insfan'i' pe‘rifion e pefifioner is praying for direction 1'0 fhe respondenfs 1'0 decide his repres fa‘rion of Annexure P—5 and consider fhe case of fhe pe‘l'ifioner for promoi-ion on fhe posi' of Time-keeper. Grievance of fhe pefifion r is fhai' he was inifially appoinfed as Daily Wage Employee in fhe Municip l Commii‘iee, Saraipali. His services were regularized in ihe year 1994 vide order of Annexure P~1 dafed 19.3.1994. The 2 6 a o " @ mmqi$ E200 anésl m (W) mmmmw mmm'£fwm aimarrrm ‘2; Sfa're of M.P. vide memo of Annexure P-3 dafed 4.3.1996 smcfioned various pos+s wifh fhe candifion fhm e same shalt noi- be filled-in withouf permission of fhe Stan and posfs are ‘ro be filled from fhe surpius smff of o1‘her deparfmenfs. Thereaf1'er. fhe pefifioner' filed W.P. No.5067/97 in i'he High Cour-1' of M.P. praying for ng of resolufion of ‘rhe Municipal Committee, Saraipali whereby reserved p0 s of Time-keeper & Traci'or' Driver were 'i‘o be filled-in by inifiai'ing seiectio process. Thar pefition was allowed and the resolufion of ‘i'he Municipal Co miffee whereby u'nplico‘l-ions were invi‘led for filling 905? of Tlme-keeyer and racl'or Driver was quashed. However, fhe case of ‘lhe pefifioner for promo‘ri n to the post of Time-keeper has not been considered by the Municipal mmittee in accordance with the circular of Annexure P—Z. Learned counsel for the itioner submits though the petitioner does not have any right to claim promoti n to the post'of Time-keeper, however, his case for promotion ought to have bee considered by the Municipal Committee. After hearing learned co nsel for the petitioner: I m'n of the opinion that this petition may be disposed o with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider the representation of Annexure P-5 of the petitioner md decide the some on its own facts in accordance with within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, Ordered accordingly. Certified copy as per ru Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge q i o t l l