IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45680 of 2008 RAJ KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.12.2008 Heard Mr. Onkar Nath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. The case has been registered under section 307, 386 etc. of the Indian Penal Code and the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. After quite lapse of some time, i.e., exactly five months to the occurrence, the police started taking interest in ensuring the arrest of the petitioner, as such, as per the contention, manipulated the records. Learned Judge had not denied the contention and has referred to a single paragraph so as to inferring involvement of the petitioner without mentioning what is the contents of the paragraph and what was its nature. Let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.3,000/-(Three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Lakhisarai, in connection with Barahiya P.S. case no.16 of 2008. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )