IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 30TH AUGUST 2010 / 8TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 5766 of 2006(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.S. KISHOREKUMAR, PROPRIETOR, KENTUCKY BREADS, ASHRAMAM, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.SIBI THOMAS JACOB RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES (APPEAL), KOLLAM. 4. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, IIND CIRCLE, KOLLAM. 5. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R.), KOLLAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.P.PRADEEP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 5766 of 2006 J ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 30th day of August, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner approached this Court challenging the coercive proceedings pursued during the pendency of Ext.P4 appeal preferred by him challenging Ext.P1 order of assessment. 2. When the matter came up for consideration before this Court on 27-02-2006, this Court passed an interim order observing that the petitioner might move an application for stay before the appellate authority and based on the result of that motion, he might move the writ petition, if so advised. In spite of the lapse of more than four years, the petitioner has not made any further motion, presumably for the reason that the petitioner does not have any subsisting grievance. There is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is no more interested with the cause of action projected in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default. (P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE) aks