IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.919 of 2011 Between: Telangana Non-Gazetted Officers Colony Welfare Association Rep., by its President, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District & others. … Petitioners And Sri S.V. Prasad, Chief Secretary, The Government of A.P., Secretary, Hyderabad. … Respondent Counsel for the petitioners: Sri M.V.S. Sai Kumar Counsel for the respondent: The Advocate General This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.919 of 2011 ORDER:- This contempt case is filed alleging wilful disobedience of order, dated 08.12.2010, in Writ Petition No.14702 of 2010. By the abovementioned order passed in the Writ Petition, this Court directed the Government of Andhra Pradesh to examine the various allegations made in the petitioners’ representation, dated 19.09.2008, and dispose of the same in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. Alleging that the said order has not been complied with, the present contempt case is filed. Sri S.V. Prasad, who was the then Chief Secretary of Government of Andhra Pradesh, filed a counter affidavit. After his retirement, Sri Pankaj Dwivedi, who is presently the Chief Secretary, filed an additional counter affidavit, wherein he has inter alia referred to various steps taken after disposal of the Writ Petition by this Court and has stated that after calling for a preliminary report from the Joint Collector-I, Ranga Reddy District and perusing the same, it was opined that in the absence of specific findings rendered in the report, no action can be taken and that accordingly he has directed the Commissioner for Cooperation and Registrar of Cooperative Societies, A.P. to conduct a regular detailed enquiry on the allegations and submit a report within one month. Considering the above events, I am of the opinion that the respondent has taken appropriate steps to comply with the order of this Court. Inasmuch as a regular enquiry is directed to be held, the respondent is expected to take a final decision on receipt of the report. Subject to the above observations, the contempt case is closed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 21.10.2011 ES