Q 01 SINGLE BENCH ^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. / 2006 PETITIONER .fr 6>y ^.-••'i ..-•'~<3?' ^^^ ^^/" 'o" (^' ^^ ^^y^ ^%y ^3%^ v^ RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. S.M. Quereshi, S/o - Shri G^w ^oh«mmad Aged about 59% years, Sub-Engineer, F'ubUc Works Department, National Highway, ''Sub-Division- Cham.pa, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, PubUc Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) l^-ggyS'-'^ (3.:!.^ jj ./''y ff ^^^3^y ^"2. Dy. Secretary, State of Chhattisgarh, Public Works Department, District - Raipur, (C.G.j. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 3n^r.?ffR-ii<* traTsn^rgw?; -•c *11HMIS.b*11<t) S^-MI^K'I'M, ®T(ltf'16,RlMKrfy< / . c^^^b.3£-S3-^6^ '••V^ 200 STT^T'^ra'(^f3^ST) ?RITW:Hf?(T3n^?T qirafa?frr wraY ff fecA <^OTC , ^;3ri^iT3[7^r 24-7.2006 Mr. Vh/ekRathore.couns^l forthe petitioner. IVIiss Deepali Pandey, Pafiel Lawyer for the respondents/State, on advance copy. Heard. By this petition, the petitjoner, who is working as Sub-Engineer, Public Works Department, Naponal Highway, Sub-Dh/ision Champa, District Janjgir-Champa, has ch^llenged the transfer order dated 30-6- 2006, whereby he has been traijisferred from Bilaspur Division to Bastar Division. The main grievance of th^ petitioner is that he is going to retire in the monthof December, 2006, j.4.,within a shortspan of 5 months and he has been transferred. Learned (jounsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be allowed to mak|e a detailed representation to respondent No.2, to which learned Panel L^wyer for the respondents/State has no objection. Having heard learned cou^isel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances ofth^ case that the petitioner is going to retire within a short span of 5 months|, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petitjoner is allowed to make a detailed representation raising all his grie\| from today along with copy of thi] decide the representation of the Fances to respondent No.2 within 10 days s petition and in turn, respondent No.2 to iaetitioner within 30 days from the date of receipt of the representation aftef' considering all the grievances raised by the petitioner in accordance witl|i law. Till then, the impugned order of transfer dated 30-6-2006 is stayep. With the direction aforesai^l, the petition stands disposed of. P.T.O. •O'l'd a5pnr ooB'aas 'o^ •^o pssodsip spue»sOS|G 900S/lt!-9Z ifcbllp >iiyK»i^ >1?->1»)> l?lPJ.I}.[l->hlh k(J?Ujh|lb ss|nj jad se Adoo psyiijao 3N'd('AA)'lftl 'Aliusnbesuoo --S itoitp ca]»•kfeitiw (jAtoPjtA) tbKh l^lte ftftZ'l'^ ..................... ttolhttS IWhlh 'iTiftlPls.j 'S>lrl»yial\iWh\tf In.P ^ ^,^ iedo£) Mtlt6^UEU5B t-jpyiiteu^uE 8Z.-3H-IX