IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 7325 of 2011-I Date of Decision: 30.11.2011 Narender Singh Rana …….. Petitioner Versus The State of H.P. & Others …….. Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Lalit K. Sehgal, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, learned Sr. Additional Advocate General. Justice Sanjay Karol, J. (Oral) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has yet not been relieved as Assistant Agriculture Development Officer from Development Block, Amb, District Una. He is still officiating. According to him, none has been posted in his place at Una. 2. He submits that impugned order of transfer dated 19th August, 2011 has resulted into acute hardship and personal difficulty. Petitioner intends to make a detailed representation, brining out such facts to the notice of the competent authority. As such, as prayed, without going into the merits, present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach respondent Whether reports of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 No.2 within a period of one week from today, who shall thereafter take a decision within a period of two weeks. 3. However, it is clarified that till such time decision is taken by respondent No.2, on the petitioner’s request for adjustment/ accommodation at Una or nearby place, petitioner shall not be relieved from Una. It is also clarified that if petitioner does not approach respondent No.2 within a period of one week, interim order shall be deemed to be vacated and petitioner shall join at his place of posting at Sirmour. 4. With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. 30th November, 2011 k.sharma