^.c ^ucT T^iqic)<i, u>-a1ti<i<o, Rlrti^y< *ii*irti a?tri^ ....ui^.lUW-^-^-V- ^200 % 3TT^?T q^P (yii^Gicg) 3TT^^TcpTf^Tfcy5 ^8H3TT^9T^Ht<P k B;??TT^R ^TfeT OT^^T PETITIONER Shakti aboull Trustl {CG)| Ver^us RESPONDENTS 1. State) Urbah Dep^r 2. The t/lunicipai Corporation, Bilaspur, through the Comjnissioner, District Bilaspur (CG) 3. The Heaith Offlcer, Municipal Corporation, Bilas|3ur, District Bilaspur (CG) (WritPetition SB: HON. SHRI DHIRENDRA 14-11-2008:- Shri Rakesh Pandey, Shri Ajay Dwivedi, respondentNo.1. Smt. Hamida Siddique,] Heard. By this petition, the| Annexure-P/1 dated 15th Octbber, BiSaspur has refused compa^sionate is dependent of Shri Fagurajn, serving as sweeper with resp{3ndents <PI<4fc">J1r1+II^C)T^'fe^t ^Rl^-CI^ ^3Tf^H3TT^^T Kumar Bihuniya, S/o Late Faguram, aged 27 years, R/o in front of Shwarinarayan Ward No.25, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Administration and Deveiopment rtment,D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(CG). under Afticle 226 of the Constitution of Jndia) MISHRA. J c|ounsel forthe petitioner. peputy Govt. Advocate for the State/ I counsel for respondents No,2 and 3. petitSoner has impugned the order of st{3ber, 2008 whereby Munfoipai Corporation, appointmerrt to the petitioner, who ajn, who died in harness on 4-7-2002 while No.2 and 3. iS^^M$i-3£i ^ t^y-78 ''^^i^ ^oET -«1<410«,tP^-l<l<?, ROIX-I^X *ii*i«ia»*i7^ 3TT^^Td?Tf^Tt^ n2TT3TT^$T9W<P II Bar^e 3TT^?T q^P (4cli^6l<£i) Wt 200 ^PTTW ^if^T 3TT^$T — -c?-- cpi^fo^ ^i^oT^' f^°(S1 <<FJI^I^ ^3Tf^T3TT^$T Learned counsel for th^ petitioner submitted that compassionate appointment has been refuse^ by the Corporation solely on the ground that the mother of the petiti|oner is also serving as ^weeper in the Corporation, though the moth^r ofthe petitioner is residing separately for the last 14 years. He furth^r submitted that he is not pressing this petition at this stage. Howev^r, he prays forliberty to fite representation against the order of Ann^xure-P/1 for grant of compassionate appointment, which may be c| ecided by the Corporation in accordance with law and policy for compa^sionate appointment. Smt. Hamida Siddique,| learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 su|bmitted that in case the petitioner files representation for redressal | of his grievances, the same shall be considered and decjded by th|e Corporation within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of the in view of the submi^sions made by iearned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is fiie representation raising ali| petitlon before the Corporatio| On such representation belng| |jisposed of with liberty to the petitjoner to his grievances which are raised in the ^ within a period of 3 weeks from today. |made bythe petitioner, the same shail be from the date of recejpt (^ accordance with law. •epresentation. considered and decided by th|e Corporation withln a period of 3 months f representation, on its own merit, in Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge