1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6566 of 2005. Govind Sahai son of Shri Ramgopal Sharma Versus Mandir Shri Chaturbhuj Ji Ka, Jaipur and Others IN THE HIGH COURT OF JJDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6566 of 2005. Govind Sahai son of Shri Ramgopal Sharma Versus Mandir Shri Chaturbhuj Ji Ka, Jaipur and Others Date of Order :::: 30/07/2009 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr. Manish Sharma, Counsel for the Petitioner Mr. G.P. Kaushik, Counsel for the Respondents Per Court : Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the impugned order dated 05.10.2004 by which the application submitted by the defendant under Order 8 Rule 1 (3) of the C.P.C. for production of the documents, in question has been rejected. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6566 of 2005. Govind Sahai son of Shri Ramgopal Sharma Versus Mandir Shri Chaturbhuj Ji Ka, Jaipur and Others As per the order of the learned trial Court there is no sufficient cause made out for allowing the application at such a late stage when sufficient opportunity had been granted to the defendants for producing the evidence. Learned Court below has exercised its jurisdiction and rejected the application, I find no jurisdictional error in the impugned order so as to call for any interference in the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India in the facts and circumstances of this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it is not correct that the petitioner had not been afforded 22 opportunities for leading evidence, as recorded in the order and it is also incorrect that all the defendants have filed joint written-statement, whereas in fact the present petitioner has filed a separate written-statement. May be the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are correct, but none the less the present case is not one, where interference is called for in the writ jurisdiction as the case is fixed for final hearing and this Court would not interfer at this late stage in the writ jurisdiction in the facts and circumstances of this case. 3 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6566 of 2005. Govind Sahai son of Shri Ramgopal Sharma Versus Mandir Shri Chaturbhuj Ji Ka, Jaipur and Others The petitioner, if aggrieved by the ultimate judgment and decree, which is passed would be at liberty to raise this objection in any appeal that may be filed. The writ petition and the stay application are accordingly dismissed summarily. (Dalip Singh) J. ashok/ 4 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6566 of 2005. Govind Sahai son of Shri Ramgopal Sharma Versus Mandir Shri Chaturbhuj Ji Ka, Jaipur and Others