IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1685 of 2009 GUDDU CHOUBEY S/O-Babuman Choubey, R/O-Vill-Sonasati, P.S.-Sikarpur, Distt.-West Champaran. ………………………………………Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………………………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 3/ 29.06.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner is sole named accused of the case which has been registered under Sections 448/307/376/511 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant in her statement given at the Primary Health Centre, Narkatiaganj alleged that the petitioner has tried to outrage her modesty. On her protest he has burnt her. Submission is that the fact is otherwise. The petitioner was victim, he was burnt and so on his fardbeyan Shikarpur P.S. Case No.- 193 of 2008 under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code was registered. The present case has been lodged and there is no 2 corroboration of the fardbeyan of the informant. There is no reason as to why the thumb impression of the victim was recorded though she was educated. Before death of the informant, her dying declaration has been recorded in which the informant has named the petitioner as her killer. Considering this, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail has been rejected. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)