1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 356 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1785 OF 1989 (D) (Sau.Kalpana Jayant Kolarkar .v. State of Maharashtra and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri Vilas Deshpande, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. Shri J.B. Jaiswal, AGP for the respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 12TH JUNE, 2009. Heard. By this application, the applicant who is the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 1785 of 1989 seeks review of the judgment and order dated 15th December, 2008 passed by the Division Bench of this Court by which the present applicants who are the original respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in the petition have been directed to make the payment of salary to the petitioner, the respondent No.1 herein. According to the applicant, the applicant had given an undertaking that in case approval to her appointment was not granted, she would not be paid any salary and, therefore, the impugned order discloses error apparent on the face of record. Learned Counsel 2 for the applicant further submitted that this aspect was not brought to the notice of this Court since the learned Counsel then appearing for the applicant was not aware of this fact. Having heard the learned Counsel for the applicant, we find no merit in the present application. The ground for the applicant for seeking review of the judgment and order is not available to the applicant in review application. Hence the application is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.