IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 26th day of September, 2011 1st Bail Application No.788 of 2011 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE 1. Amit S/o Shri Bhola, 2. Bhola S/o Prithvi Singh, R/o Village Tonda, Kalyanpur, Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. ………Applicants Versus tate of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party S Arising out of Case Crime No. 87 of 2011, Under Section- 307 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District- Haridwar. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mrs. Prabha Naithani, Advocate, present for the applicants. Mr. B.S.Parihar, Brief Holder, present for the State. Heard. Applicants Amit and Bhola, who are in jail in connection with Crime No. 87 of 2011, relating to offence punishable under Section 307 I.P.C., Police Station-Kotwali Roorkee, District- Haridwar have sought their release on bail. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that one Ankit and Ankur said to have inflicted knife injuries on the person injured. They have already been directed to be released on bail, on the ground that they were juveniles. It is further 2 contended that the role assigned to the present applicants Amit and Bhola is that of catching hold the injured. The applicants have no criminal history. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion, as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicants deserve bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicants Amit and Bhola, be released on bail on their executing personal bond by each one of them and furnishing two sureties for each one of them, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 26.09.2011 JM