IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCAL AT NAINTAL Writ Petition No. 774(M/S) of 2008 Surendra Singh alias Suresh S/o Sri Nandan Singh, R/o Village and Post Chhattarpur, Tehsil Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar, Ordinary Member, Chattarpur Sadhan Sahkari Samiti Ltd. Chhattarpur, Tehsil Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar. …………….Petitioner Vs. Union of India through Secretary, Finance, New Delhi and others. ……………….Respondent Dated:-21-5-2008 Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard Sri Lalit Belwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Arvind Vashisht, learned Assistant Solicitor General for the respondent No. 1 and Sri K.P. Upadhyay, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State- respondent Nos. 2 to 5. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a following prayer:- (a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 3 to initiate the election process of the co-operative society in the State of Uttarakhand only after the implementation of the Debt waiver and Debt Relief Scheme Launched by the respondent No. 1. (b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing and setting aside the letter/order dated 30-4- 2008 issued by the respondent No. 5 and further to direct to start the process only after the implementation of the Debt waiver and Debt Relief Scheme launched by the respondent No. 1. (c) Such other relief be granted which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit proper and award cost to the petitioner. Learned Additional C.S.C. has stated on the basis of the instruction received from the respondent No. 4 i.e. Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Uttarakhand at Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar, the impugned Election programme has been re-scheduled. The grievance raised by the petitioner is that, if the election is held most of the Societies for non-payment of the loans would be defaulter and the scheme for debt relief has been implemented by the Central Government in anticipation. The registrar cooperative society had already considered the same grievance and passed appropriate order. In view of the order passed by the registrar, the grievance of the petitioner had already been redressed. The writ petition has rendered infructuous. Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. All pending applications stands disposed of accordingly. (B.S. Verma, J.) 21-5-2008 M.K.