IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Rev. (T) No. 13 of 2008. Decided on: 15th November, 2010. Sohan Lal. ….Petitioner. -Versus- Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others. .…Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The learned erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal has not taken into consideration that the petitioner was required to be issued one month’s notice before terminating his services as per the appointment letter dated 07.05.1984 (Annexure-PC). Consequently, there is error apparent on the face of record in the judgment dated 9th December, 1999, rendered in O.A. No. 735 of 1993. Accordingly, the judgment dated 9th December, 1999 is recalled. The O.A. No. 735 of 1993 be listed for hearing on 18th December, 2010. 2. The petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge 15th November, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - - 3 -