IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. W.P. No.66 of 2010 Date of Decision:25.11.2010 Baljeet .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Amit Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, A.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) In pursuance to the direction of this Court, the petitioner is present in the Court alongwith his counsel. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no further action is called for and the present petition is rendered infructuous. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 25.11.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE