'^^* 't -t> ) C^'l^ IN THE GH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILAS>UR V%itPetitkm N0^3.^/2003 / PEmiONER Smfc Vijsy Laxmi Devare^ j^ed about 43 years, W/o Shri Laxman Deiware^ Assistant Grade-H, Panchayat andSodal Welfare Deparbne'nt R/o Akash Nagar, Erezerpur, Jagdalpur/Dlstt. Baster (CQ) - Vereus- : 1. Uracaioflhdia^ ThEOiighSecretery, Mtaistxy Qf PereoEnnel andTrainixig, NewDelhL ^L2. SkateofMadtyaPradfisti, M.: ^K^ •w.^ ^ .^ ^-'' o / Tluxm^iSecnetaty, Pandiayat AndSodal Welfare Department, Marrtralaya^ VaUabh Bhawan, Kiopal(M.P.). 3. Stateof Chhflttisgaiti, ThroughSecretaiy, P^aichayat AndSodalWdfare Department, D.K&aiawan, Raipur(CG) 4. D^xriy Direckcr, Pandhayat andSodal Welfare Department, Jagdalptav J^dalpur Distt. Baster(CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MOVE REPRESENTATION. ^ff^^y T T XI-HC-22 3?1^T^T R^IW 31T^T -^FRW^liipl ,^ ^? ^141d4, ^TilwKo, fa<rtt^y 3^?T 1C[5RF ^ W^T^RK-^^-'-'^-'-Y-'n 200^ fa*^ ^V^ ^wi^K <yf^a 23.07.2003 Sri Prashant Jaiswai, counst Sri V.V.S. Murthy, ^dditio^a! Union of Zndia/respondent NoJl. Sri Sanjay K. Agrawai, respondent No.3. Heard the counse! By this petition fiied underj of Indla, 1+ie petitioner is seekin^ by order ciated 28th April, 20| aliowing h©rto make repre^entatt 2003. / Jhe learned counsel for tht of the illness of fne petitloner 1+serefore, she was not able to r| about the time ailowed by the she couid not submit r©pr@s@ntal{ion 2003. ,4t the outset, the {earne^ may be permltted to send the rel is for fnem to consider the rep^e^ deem it just, proper and appropri4 Coilrt ^pr@s@nta1{ion cbh<t<n<i)nW^ ^ fe^ ^^5R - ^ 31^cPT 31RSI ^i for the petitioner. Central &ovt. Standing Counse! for De^uty Advocate ^enerai for the State/ |or the parties. fArticies 226 & 227 of the Constitution extension of time which was granted i|)3, passed in VV.P.No.2104/2002 for |on to ths respondentg up to 10 AActy, ^ petjtioner submitted that on account she taking treatment at Nagpur, fcceive the Intimation from her CQunse! for making representation. As such , to th®respondents up to 10th May, counse! submirted that the petitioner |)r©sentationto the respondents and it 'ep^esentation of the petitioner, if they Ite in the circumstances of the case. f F XI-HC-22 CT^T^T l^nicb ^^s^ «i^a -^. Soma ^^ ^r^ '^raRpi, ^Ttl^'lt<o, faw^y 3ff^5T '^5T^ ^tH^l ^Nl^'''*** *^R^ 200^ 'f^ST' ^I^T i^ff^ ^Ka Having regard to the the petitioner, the petitioner is 1'he and it is fo| reprssentation of the petitioner reasonabte that the petitioner co| on account of the supervening her representation and pass appr^ With observations, Consequsntly, I.A.No.6272^ <»><<t{<rt<Ili 4it*i<i? ^ fe^ <Rn^i< ^^f^^i^r |ssion made by the iearned counse! fo-r c^t liberty to 1+ie representation to the respondents to consider the If the respondents find it just and ^Sd not the representation in time 4ircu?riStances, then they may consider \ \ ' I -; t|e petition standsdisposed of, |2003 a!so stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [^^^^