FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 749 OF 2008 (Dnyandeo Narsingh @ Jaysingh Dhokale V/s.Kantilal Narsingh @ Jaysingh Dhokale & Ors.) Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, apperances, Court’s order or directions and Registrar orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Smt.Anjali Helekar,adv.for appellant. Mr.S.V.Marve,adv.for respondent no.1. CORAM: SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED: 30TH JUNE, 2009. P.C. : 1. This Appeal arises out of the decision in Regular Civil Suit No.258 of 1997 dismissing the same and also dismissing the appeal against the order. By the said suit, the appellant had sought permanent injunction to restrain the respondents from disturbing possession of the appellant’s property in respect of Gat No.628, 629 and 630. There is a concurrent finding of both the courts below that the appellant is not in exclusive possession of the said properties. This inference has been reasonably drawn on the basis of the evidence before the court. The concurrent finding of fact has to be accepted. There is no substantial question of law arising in the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed in limine. [JUDGE]