IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1026 of 2010 ANSUYA PRASAD WIFE OF LATE CHANDRIKA PRASAD RESIDENT OF MAHARAJGANJ, P.S. MAHARAJGANJ, DISTRICT - SIWAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SIWAN 3. OFFICER INCHARGE OF MAHARAJGANJ P.S., DISTRICT SIWAN ----------- 02. 11.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that Maharajganj Police Station Case no. 20 of 2010 for the alleged offence under Section 379/340 of the Indian Penal Code was although registered on 15th of March 2010, still the investigation has not been completed and the persons who have committed the offence, are not being properly proceeded with. Learned counsel for the State opposes the submission and submits that it is categorically stated that the investigation is proceeding accordingly, and during the course of investigation, the persons whose complicity is found, have been preceded and lawful action has been taken against them. The investigation is still continuing and action would be taken against the person including Railway Engineer if their complicity is found. Be that as it may, considering the rival submission of the parties, it is expedient in the interest of justice that the investigation of the aforesaid police case be investigated properly without unnecessary delay and upon completion of the investigation, let police submit the police report accordingly. The writ application stands disposed of. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)