1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4447/2010. Birla Cement Works. vs. Union of India & Ors. Date : 5.5.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.LR Mehta ) for the petitioner. Mr.DD Thanvi ) Mr.Ramit Mehta ) - - - - - Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred two revision petitions before the respondent no.1 Union of India and that too in the year 2007. The petitioner also sought interim relief from the revisional authority but no order yet has been passed. It is submitted that as the revision petition has not been decided, therefore, the petitioner served a notice for demand of justice even then the respondents has not taken the decision. Since the respondents are not deciding the revision petitions, therefore, the petitioner has no remedy but to approach this Court for seeking relief that the State may not grant the mining lease to the respondent no.6. I considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. Since the matter is pending before the 2 revisional authority in two revisions and therein the petitioner can seek appropriate interim order also, therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition for the relief as claimed. However, since the revision petitions of the petitioner are pending before the respondent no.1 since 2007, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent, competent authority, to decide the revision petitions expeditiously and if that is not decided, then to pass appropriate order on the application which is submitted for the interim relief. The interim application may be decided expeditiously preferably within a period of fifteen days from the receipt of copy of this order but after hearing other parties in the revision petitions. Certified copy of this order may be supplied to the revisional authority by the petitioner who may fix the date for hearing on the revision petitions or on the application for grant of interim relief. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya