1 cri appln 34.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 34 OF 2011 Shabanabee Mohd. Hakim .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Shri U. I. Thole, Advocate for the Applicant. Smt. Y. M. Kshirsagar, A.P.P. for the Respondent/State. CORAM : S. S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 12TH JANUARY, 2011. PER COURT : . Heard counsel appearing for the applicant. Since this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail, in the alternative counsel appearing for the applicant submits that limited protection of 15 days may be granted to the applicant, so as to apply for regular bail. The prayer is genuine. In the interest of justice the protection is required to be granted for limited period i. e. for two weeks. Hence the concerned Investigating Officer is directed not to take any coercive action against the applicant for 2 cri appln 34.11 two weeks from today. The application stands rejected and disposed of. [S. S. SHINDE, J.] bsb/Jan. 11