IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4511 of 2007 DR.BIMAL PRASAD SINGH Versus THE V.C.MAGADH UNIVERSITY & ORS. ----------- 3 14.09.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at page no.2 in direction no.1 it has wrongly been mentioned that “petitioner must file a fresh copy of representation (annexed as Annexure-11 series with the writ application) before respondent no.4, the District Superintendent of Education, Jehanabad”. He says that petitioner will file a fresh representation before respondent no.1, Vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya and therefore, direction no.1 may be modified by permitting him to do so. Let direction no.1 contained in the order dated 25.8.2009 at page 2 be read as “direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.1, Vice- Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya” within one month from today. The order dated 25.8.2009 stands modified thus. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)