1 WP.3601-2010 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3601 OF 2010 Faruq Ismail Patel ...Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. ----- Mr. C.K. Talekar, for the Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Gadkri, APP for the State. Mr. E.B. Dixit, for Respondent nos.7 and 8. Mr. A.G. Damle, for Respondent No.10. ---- CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D. SALVI, JJ. JULY 06, 2011. P.C. 1. We have heard Mr. Talekar, the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. As noted in our order dated 22.6.2011, on completion of the investigation in CR Nos.108 and 109 of 2010, the final reports have been submitted on 5.4.2011 and 25.4.2011 respectively before the court concerned. We are also informed that on completion of the investigation in CR No.149 of 2009, a separate charge-sheet has already been filed. 2 WP.3601-2010 3. Undoubtedly, the petitioner is entitled to receive a copy of the charge-sheet registered on the basis of his complaint, and if he is not satisfied with the investigation, he may agitate the same before the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate’s court. 4. Mr. Talekar, then invited our attention to the other prayers namely, for direction to transfer the investigation of all cases/complaints reported/lodged by the petitioner and his family members against the respondents and their employees, hirelings, representative etc. from the Goregaon Police Station to any other independent investigation agency. However, no details of the complaint have been given, and if any compliant has not been registered by the police, the petitioner’s remedy to file a private complaint is not taken away. 5. Hence, the Petition is rejected, but with liberty as is available in law. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.) 3 WP.3601-2010