1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Wednesday, the Seventh day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.10864 of 2011 1 RAJAVEL 2 MURUGAN :PETITIONER / ACCUSED NOS.3&4 -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, YERVADI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.159/2011 :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.PALANIVELAYUTHAM, Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 3 of TNPPDL Act in Crime No.159 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they were standing in the bus stop along with A1 and A2. Since the bus was not stopped in the bus stop, A1 has pelted the stone and caused damage to the bus glass worth about Rs.500/- and they apprehend for arrest and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.Refuting the same, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) would submit that the concerned Government bus is a non-stop bus and no stopping in the said bus stop and therefore, the bus was not stopped in the said bus stop, the petitioners caused damage to the bus worth about Rs.500/- and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 13.08.2011 and the case of the petitioners is that the petitioners are the passengers who are awaiting for bus, but the bus did not stop in the said bus stand and thus they have committed the said offence and as the investigation is considerably over, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, Tirunelveli District and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 07/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO: 1.The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, Tirunelveli District 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Inspector of Police, Yervadi Police Station, Tirunelveli District. +1. CC to M/S. S.PALANIVELAYUTHAM Advocate SR.No.30518. RP/08.09.2011/2P/6C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10864/2011 Date :07/09/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/