1 S.B.CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.354/2006. Roopnarayan. VS Smt.Panni Devi & Ors. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.354/2006. Roopnarayan. VERSUS Smt.Panni Devi and Others. 22.03.2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Satish Khandal, for the appellant. Mr.K.N.Sharma, for the respondents. ***** An application No.6646 dated 12.03.2010 has been filed by the appellant stating therein that the respondent No.8 Smt.Rukmani Devi wife of late Shri Shiv Sahai has expired on 22.08.2009 and her legal representatives are already on record, as such, her name may be ordered to be deleted. The said application is not opposed. The same is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application No.6646 accordingly stands disposed of. In view of the order passed on the application No.6646 for deleting the name of the respondent No.8, the application No.6644 dated 12.03.2010 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act stands disposed of as the name of the respondent No.8 has already been ordered to be deleted. 2 S.B.CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.354/2006. Roopnarayan. VS Smt.Panni Devi & Ors. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application No.6645 dated 12.03.2010 filed under Order 23 Rule 3 C.P.C. with the prayer that during the pendency of the appeal, the parties have arrived at a compromise, a copy of which has been filed as Annexure-A/1. In the facts and circumstances, since the said application has not been attested, it is directed that the original application along with the documents filed therewith be sent to the learned trial court for the purposes of attestation of the compromise. The decree in terms of the compromise be prepared. The parties are directed to appear before the learned trial court on 17.04.2010. Consequently, the appeal and the application No.6645 dated 12.03.2010 stand disposed of. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.