IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42035 of 2011 Dharmshila Devi Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 14.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused in Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 595 of 2010 registered for offences under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 63, 65 and 68 of the Copy Right Act. According to the F.I.R. it appears that one Dipendra Kumar Mishra along with Ashok Kumar used to supply duplicate Solar Lights to various Gram Panchayats without having any VAT registration. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the Mukhias including the petitioner is that they used to direct supply of Solar Lights from the specific shop. He also states that the Mukhiyas got solar lights installed merely on the direction of D.D.C. by which the articles were purchased from the specific shop. In the facts and similar circumstances, large number of persons similarly situated have been granted bail including one Prem Kumar Singh in Cr. Misc. No. 33740 of 2011. In view of the facts and circumstances, the anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks on the date of receipt/production of this order in the court below. Petitioner, namely, Dharmshila Devi is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on her furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 595 of 2011, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. Mkc/ (Shivaji Pandey, J.)