:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4168 OF 2008 Mr. Yatin Vasudeo Chavan & ors. ..Applicants Vs. Mr. Anil Pitambar Randive and anr. ..Respondents Mr. M.K. Kocharekar for applicant. Ms. P.U. Badadare for respondent no.1. Ms. A.A. Mane, APP for State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT.V.K. SMT.V.K. SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. TAHILRAMANI,J. TAHILRAMANI,J. Date Date Date : : : November 24, 2008. November 24, 2008. November 24, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicants-original accused, the learned Advocate for the respondent no.1-original complainant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking quashing of C.C. No. T-28 of 2008 which is pending before the learned JMFC, IIIrd Court, Ulhasnagar, Thane. The said C.C. pertains to C.R. No.I-28 of 2008 of Ambernath Police Station. The said case is under Sections 336, 427 read with Section 34 of IPC. :2: 3. During the pendency of the petition, the parties have amicably settled the dispute between them. The learned Advocate for the complainant, on instructions, states that as the matter has been amicably settled, the said CC be quashed. 4. In view of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of B.S. Joshi and another Vs. State of Haryana and another, reported in JT 2003(3) S.C. 277 and in view of the decision of this court in the case of Deepak Pandurang Magar and ors. vs. Sandeep Sitaram Sule and anr. dated 23/10/2008 in Criminal Writ Petition No. 2255 of 2008, the prayer of the applicant can be considered. 5. Hence, C.C. No.T-28 of 2008 pending before the learned JMFC, IIIrd Court, Ulhasnagar and the proceedings relating thereto are quashed. (Smt.V.K. (Smt.V.K. (Smt.V.K. Tahilramani,J.) Tahilramani,J.) Tahilramani,J.)