1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application No.498 of 2010 [Bharat alias Gandhi son of Mahesh Gokhale Vs. State of Mah.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr.Ashwin Wasnik, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Doifode, APP for respondent. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 16th April, 2010. 1. Heard learned Adv. Mr. Ashwin Wasnik for the applicant and learned APP Mr. S.S. Doifode for the respondent. 2. Perused the Case Diary and affidavit of the State. 3. This case arises out of Crime No. 49/2010. 4. This Court had dealt with bail of one Gopal Burde, who was involved in the same crime. 5. Considering that the prosecution was not able to demonstrate specific acts and participation of said Gopal Burde, this Court had grated him bail. 6. No specific imputations are levelled against present applicant, i.e., Bharat alias 2 Gandhi Gokhale. This applicant also seems to have left the place soon the accused and the victim left the place, where the victim sat on the pillion seat of the vehicle of one of the accused persons. 7. Even according to the State, as spelt out in the Affidavit-in-Reply, three accused persons, namely [1] Sonu, [2] Pravin, and [3] Nilesh are involved in commission of offence punishable under Sections 363 and 376 (g) of Indian Penal Code. 8. Though the alleged involvement of present applicant is not exactly the same as was alleged against Gopal, the case of the applicant is not similar to that of Gopal and other two accused. 9. In view of this, application is allowed. 10. The applicant be released on bail on furnishing a Personal Bond and a Solvent Surety in a sum of Rs.10,000-00 [rupees ten thousand only]. 11. Hamdast is allowed. Judge |Hedau| 3