IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 175 OF 2008 SHRI. SAZU NARAYAN LOTLIKAR AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus SHRI. BHOLA R. LOTLIKAR ... Respondent Mr. J. F. Melo, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Joseph Vaz, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- S.A. BOBDE, J. Date:- 25th April, 2008 P.C. The petitioners have preferred this writ petition against the order of injunction granted by the appellate Court, granting an access to the respondent over their land. The petitioners' land is survey No.90/14. The respondent's land is survey nos.90/2-A and 17. The lower appellate Court has relied on the plans prepared by two civil engineers, Shri P.M. Govli and Shri N.D. Kanolkar and has come to the conclusion that though the suit access is not shown in the original plan issued by the Government of Goa, it cannot be said that the respondents do not have access, as pointed out by the Civil Engineer N.D. Kanolkar which shows a traditional access for the appellant and his family members through the land survey No.90/14. This finding is based on evidence. It is, therefore, liable to be interfered with. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. However, it would be in the interest of justice to direct the trial Court to expedite the the suit. Accordingly, the trial Court is directed to decide the suit within a period of six months from the next date. Needless to say that the trial Court shall decide the suit independently, without being influenced by its earlier findings. S.A. BOBDE, J. ssm.