IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17563 of 2008 Madan Prasad, son of Late Lakshmi Lal, Resident of village Amar Chhatauni, P.O. Pataura, P.S. Motihari, District East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 3. The Deputy Collector (Revenue), East Champaran at Motihari. 4. The Treasury Officer, East Champaran at Motihari. 5. The Provident Fund Officer, East Champaran at Motihari. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 14.12.2011. Shri Pankaj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per statement made in counter affidavit, amount of G.P.F. has been paid, but interest has not been paid as claimed by the petitioner. Shri R.K. Singh, learned A.C. to G.P.13 submits that as per calculation, G.P.F. amount has been paid in accordance with law. Since the amount of G.P.F. has been paid, which was claimed in the writ petition, there is no reason to further keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of. However, regarding the claim of interest, which has been made orally before this Court, the petitioner can be granted liberty to file representation before 2 respondent no.5/Provident Fund Officer, East Champaran, Motihari within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.5 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no.5 considers the claim of interest made by the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.5 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)