CW 6542/08 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6542/08 Khyali Ram & Ors. Versus Board of Revenue & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 30/03/2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Dr. Ram Kishan Sharma, for petitioner *** Instant petition has been filed by petitioner against the order of Revenue Appellate Authority dt.16th May, 2006 whereby application filed u/s.5 of Limitation Act along with appeal filed by respondent was allowed and delay in its filing was condoned. However, against the order granting condonation of delay, revision petition was preferred by the petitioner before Board of Revenue that too has been rejected vide order Ann.6 dt.24th April, 2008. Main grievance raised by petitioner is that the revenue suit was decreed by the Court of SDO on 6th August, 2001 and appeal was preferred by the State Government after inordinate delay along with application u/s.5 of Limitation Act which has been allowed by the Revenue Appellate Authority under order impugned which is not legally sustainable and it has also not been CW 6542/08 [2] considered by the Board of Revenue while exercising its revisional power under order impugned dt.24th April, 2008. I have heard counsel for petitioner and does not find any any manifest error committed by the authority in passing order impugned which may call for interference. Consequently, writ petition stands dismissed. However, petitioner will be at liberty to raise all objections available under law before Revenue Appellate Authority where the appeal is pending for adjudication. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA6542CW08 30-3.doc