y Si^&BenclB f ^^-7^2- IN THBHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATHSGARH WRIT FM'ITIOI^ilO. ^(^^8 /2006 PETITIOJSER ^^ (^. .€^ ..•-•'\^'Jfy ^y^ ^-^ .-' 0<-'- -^y jc^y1 v^a^s9> ^^°-r^' .,'g^ ^f^-^ "^, V -y L.-,,!-''"•? ^i?. 'f^^,VRs^ftci ^%M: ^^ff^/ , Krishna Murari Jaiswal, ^ S/0. Shri Jagdeo Prasad Jaiswal, aged about - 38 years. Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Girls Higher Secondary School, Katghora, Distt. Korba (C.G.) Smt. Chandrawati Markam, W/0. Shri Munna Lal Markam, aged about - 40 years. Upper Division Teacher, • Govt. Prunary School Dhelwadih. Distt. Korba (C.G.) Satyanarayan Kaushik / S/0. Shri Cheduram Kaushik aged about - 40 years. Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Girls High School Pali, Distt. Korba (C.G.) Amlan Akka,, S/0. Shri Theodor Akka, aged about - 35 years. Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Primary Sqhool Batra, (Pali) Distt. Korba (C.G.) Ku. Pramila Pal, -' W/0. Shri Anant Lal Pal, aged about - 35 years. Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary School Sakri Distt. Bilaspur C.G.) 8- RESPONDENTS ffs",'m"isi3t,. /^9S9%. ff-i../'" .'V 1•^ ji f^^T? ^g^^, '^- ^ li's^^'fe;,;,; I; '1"' "a'^. ... f'1' /• vi??s^—:^.<'y^ •'•'.-'' ''-'i&iiaa.B.sS5' Jaishanker Prasad Sahu,, S/0. Shri Bhagwat Prasad Sahu, aged about - 37 years. Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary School Jamnipali N.T.P.C. Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) Vinod Kumar Sahu,. S/0. Shri Govind Ram Sahu, aged about - 37 years. Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary School Jamnipali N.T.P.C. Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh,, Through - The Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S, Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal WeUare Department, Raipiu- (C.G.) Director, Pubfic Instruction Department, Raipur (C.G.) Joint Director, Public Instruction Depafa-nent. Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) Collector,, Tribal-Welfare, Korba (C.G.) 7 6. District Education Officer, District Korba (C.G.) 7. District Education Officer, District: Bilaspur (C.G.) •'\ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF mDIA XI-HC-78 3I^T ^RI R-fi«b (mran^TOTW ^1*IWI ShNlct) 3ST'^l<<lclt|, anltl'is, [s|<-ll*fy< . ^^•ct-S-7'S/ WT 200^ 3ii^i >4acn (yt^2'^) STBTWflfgtTSn^T Mr. Anil Sin9h Rqjput, courj Mr. Satish Supta, Deputy ^ advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By this writ petition under the petitioner-s have sought for| increments and seniority on the the light of the decision rende| Jaba'pur m O.A.No.1452/1998 M.P. & others) dated 31-1-2000. The case of the petition4 Upper Division Teachers in the period of two year's with fixed sc^ two years teriure the petitioners the re9uiar" poy scaie. Other s Administrsrtiye Tribunal, Jabalpui)- Tribunai vide order dated 31-1-; several r'epresantations to accor^l situctsd Teochers, but the respfi they are forced to file this iwrit Learned counsel for the pe| a!!owed to make a representation to the petitioners and the same +i«Fd4)-<tiit<]-ft'fffs^<Ri«i< ^Tsri^iran^r sel for tha petitioners. •ovt: Advocate for- the State/respondents, on lArticle 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a directio.i to the respondents to pay t.he b^s'is of the date of their initiai appointment in ^ed by the State Administrative Tribunal, (ttlsrish Chandra Singh & others ys. State of [rs is that they were initialiy appointed os Sc|iool Education Department on probatlon for a lary. However, later on after completion of i^ere regulsrized but they are not being given |milarly situated teachers moved the State for regular pay scaie, wherein the learned •2(p00 allowed thesame. The petitjoners mode same treatment as they are also similarly sspfindents hove not paid any hsed, therefore, p^titipn. (•itioners subfflits that the petitioners may be ^•o respondent No.3 to give similar' tr'eatment scaie which has been sanctioned to other B°y P.T.O. XI-HC-78 sn^r^R^icb ga(13fI^T sh*<i* ^- ;oma 2-'?< 3:SET ^WW^, (STi1tf'.t(o, RlMKHy . -o^ HI+K'ITSft+llcb ^T 200^ 3ll^l 4a<»> (yit^««^iT) WtTTWBfsg'STI^T -2j accdunt Toqay similarly situated teacheps on Tribuna! dated 31-1-2000, to whi^h respondents has no objection. Hsvin9 heard learned coun^ facts cnd circunistances of the counsei for the petitioner's oppearf the petitioners are aiiowed to makt a period of two weeks from •todfr respondent No.3 shail decide the ^ai 30 days from the date of its rece\ the petitioners and takin9 into ac{ the iearned State Administristiv^ present petitioners stsnd on th| No.1452/1998, then they be also dp With the direction aforesail! Pcrties are entitled for cerf chllfll'fl-f WHvfi fr fS^S <R|<-&1< ^iSTf^R'STI^T of the order of the State Administratiye leorned counsel appesring for the State/ i^el for the parties cnd having regord to the \case, the limited prayer made by learned to be just, fair and r'easonable. Therefore, a reprsssntation to respondent No.3 within raising al! their grisvances and in turn, ^ame in an objective manner within a period of Ipt, after considering all the points raised by :ount the order dated 31-1-2CK30 passed by Tribuncl in O.A.No.1452/1998, and if the some footing as the petitioners in O.A. ^anctioned the same pay scale and seniority. ;i|d, the petition stands disposed of. rified copy of this or-dsr. P.T.O.