"%. 3S' •SPt,-JJ '?/y uJipC 631^ hS IN THE HIGH COUKT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR W.P.LQ^ P.R. No. 6842 of2(X)8 Petitioner Preeti Choudhaiy, D/o Shri Dev Prashad Choudhaxy, aged about 20 year, R/o Fool Chouk, near Devito hotel, Jorapara Raipur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. M!8uliifP'5'iB> The State of CIihattisgarh, Through The Secretaiy, Madhayaatife Shiksha Matidal, Chliattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) The Secretaiy, Madhayamik Shftsfaa Maadal, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District RaipurC.O. The Chflirmcn, Madhayanuk Shikaha Mandal, Chhattisgarh, Raipiir, District Raipur C.G. (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OPTHE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotri J.) Sfari Vijay K. Deshinukh, Advocate for tiie petitiortfiT. Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, Panel Lawyer for tbe respondent No. 1. Shri Paukaj ^arwal, Advocate for the icspcaidents No. 2 and 3. 4. ORDER (Passed on this 3rd Day ofDeceniber, 2008) Lear&ed counsel appearing tbr the petltioner subauts that the petitioncr had appeared in the 12th CIass examination, hdd in the year 2007. As per tbe iutei'aet informatioxi, tbe petitio.ner has passed with first division. Despite request, the petitioaer has not been supplicd wifli the inark-sheet Stui Pan-kaj ^arwal, leamcd counscl appearing for tfae aespondents No. 2 and 3 undertalccs that the orignial niark- sheet shall be supplied to tfae petitfoiier withja a penod of two weeksr from: the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. In view of fhc foiegoing, accoiding to leamed couasel appearing for the petttioner, aothiag sumves in ttus petition. Thus, tbe petition stands <Usposed,o£Noorder asto costs. Thakur Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge