PETITIONERS HIGH'COURT OF CHHATHSGARH : BILASPUR WR‘T PETITION (C) NO. 1671' OF 2009 1. Nanhu @ Sarangdhar Diwan, Slo Late Ramadhar Diwan, aged about 54'yeara. 2. Guddu @ Pinakdhar Diwan, Sic Late Ramadhar Diwan, aged about 50 years, . ‘ Both Rio Kankahpara Ranpur District Ralpur (CG) Versus Secretary, Department of Commefbiak Tax. 1‘ - (Registration), Maniraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipu! (CG). 2. Naya Raipur Deveiopment Authority, ; through its Chief Executive Officer, Raipur' (CG). 3. Deputy. Manager (Land), Naya Raipur Deve!qpment Authority. Raipur (CG). (Writ petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of indie) Single Bench ‘ Hon’ble Shri Satish K Agnihotri J. Present :- ~Shn Satyendra Sahu Advocate forthe petitioner Shn Prashant Mishra, Advocate General with $hri Aiok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondent No.1 . ‘ Shri BD. Guru Advocate for the respondents No.2 & 3. RDER oRA (Passed on this 13’ day or Juiy, 2009) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2) --At the very outset, Shri Satyendra Sahu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in the tight of para 4 of the return dated 10-7-2009 tiled on behalf of the State nothing remains In this petrtion for adjudicatlon however“ learned counsel prays that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the authorities concerned to consider the case of the petitioner 3) Shri Prashant Mishra, learned Advocate General appearing for the State, submits that in light of averment made in para 4 of the return, if a representationfapplication is made by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and orders shall be passed in accordance with law and on its , own merits. ' 4) ln view of foregoing, the writ petition stands disposed of. ”:éé%/ saw“ K. gn'xhot“ 3nd? Gowri , Sal — RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the , / K"