1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CAO NO. 173/2010 IN MCA (Rev.) ST. NO. 1038 OF 2010 IN REJ. WRIT PETITION NO. 551 OF 2009 (Smt. Annapurna Pandharinath Chandankhede vs. State of Maharashra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. MARCH 17, 2010. Heard Shri Trivedi, learned counsel for the applicant/ petitioner, Shri Deshpande, learned counsel for respondents No. 2, 3 & 4 and Shri Mujumdar, learned AGP for respondents No. 1, 5 & 6. Shri Parchure, learned counsel informs that Respondent No. 7 has collected the brief back from him. However, Respondent No. 7 is served after the Court issued notice in the matter on 10.02.2010. The reasons for condonation of delay are supported by personal affidavit of learned counsel. For those reasons, though the respective counsel are opposing the prayer, delay is condoned. The office to register MCA. The MCA is also supported by personal affidavit of learned counsel for the applicant/ petitioner. This Court has by separate order condoned the delay of 46 days in filing this MCA. For the same reasons, the order dated 09.11.2009 is recalled and rejected writ 2 petition No. 551 of 2009 is restored back to file. All objections be removed by 5th April 2010. If the objections are not removed, petition shall stand dismissed automatically without reference to Court with cost of Rs.1,500/- to High Court Legal Services Sub- Committee, Nagpur. At this stage, Shri Deshpande, learned counsel has pointed out that the State of Maharashtra has been joined as party through Chief Conservator of Forests. Shri Trivedi, learned counsel states that he will join the State and Chief Conservator of Forests suitably and separately. Leave to amend to that extent granted. JUDGE *GS.