IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL SECOND APPEAL SECOND APPEAL NO.254 OF 2004 NO.254 OF 2004 NO.254 OF 2004 Mahadu Bala Gavate & Ors. ..Appellants versus Bharat D. Gavate & ors. ..Respondents. Mr.P.S.Dani for the Appellant Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 24th April, 2006 Dated : 24th April, 2006 Dated : 24th April, 2006 P.C. 1. Heard learned Advocate for the Appellant. The suit simplicitor for permanent injunction was filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants alleging that they are cultivating the suit land and the defendants are obstructing their possession. The defendants took the contention that the plaintiffs are not in possession. 2. Both the courts below after considering the entire evidence have come to the conclusion that the plaintiffs have proved their possession. 3. There is no substantial question of law involvedin the matter. The appeal is dismissed in limini. (S.R.Sathe, J.)