THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3733 of 2010 ORDER: This revision is filed against the order, dated 10.08.2010, passed by the learned District Judge, Anantapur in I.A.No.686 of 2010 in O.P.No.363 of 2009. Petitioner is the daughter-in-law of the respondent. The petitioner had a minor son and her husband died in the recent past. The respondent filed O.P.No.363 of 2009 under the Guardians and Wards Act before the District Court, Anantapur. After hearing the parties, the District Court referred the matter to the Lok Adalat. An award was passed on 06.05.2010. Some of the terms are that the respondent shall pay a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- towards permanent alimony to the petitioner and the latter, in turn, shall handover the custody of the minor child to the respondent till he gets acquaintance. The respondent was placed under obligation to maintain, and incur other expenditure of the minor child. The respondent filed I.A.No.686 of 2010 under Rule 18 of the State Legal Services Authority Regulations with a prayer to direct the petitioner herein to handover the custody of the child. It was urged that though the custody of the child was handed over on receiving the amount of Rs.3,00,000/-, the petitioner retained the custody thereafter in the name of exercising the visitation rights. The application was opposed by the petitioner. Through the order under revision, the learned District Judge allowed the I.A. Hence, this revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. There is some uncertainty and vagueness in the award as to the exact steps to be taken vis-à-vis the child. According to the award, the petitioner is under obligation to send her minor son to the house of the respondent till he gains acquaintance with him. Another clause is that both the parties agreed that the welfare of the minor shall be taken by the petitioner after reopening of the schools or after summer vacations. There is no definite observation as to the person with whom the custody of the minor child shall be. Be that as it may, the petitioner is none other than the mother of the child. The respondent was certainly conferred with the rights vis-à-vis the child under the award. It is represented that steps are being taken to seek clarification/review of the award. This Court feels that an interim arrangement can be directed as between the parties till the matter is decided definitely one way or the other. Therefore, the civil revision petition is disposed of, modifying the order under revision to the effect that on every Friday, the petitioner herein shall produce the child before the Family Court, Anantapur at 12.00 noon and the respondent shall be entitled to have the visitation rights with the child till 5.00 p.m. This arrangement shall be treated as tentative till the learned Family Judge or the Lok Adalat, as the case may be, clarifies the matter. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:06.09.2010 kdl