IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2009 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 28792 of 2009(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.K.NARAYANAN, SEENU HOUSE, KODUVAYOOR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY, PALAKKAD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY, PALAKKAD. ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.JIBU P THOMAS SRI.P.S.APPU SRI.A.R.NIMOD SRI.C.A.ANOOP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COMEUP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.28792 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of December, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges the refusal to grant building permit. Ext.P2 has been issued rejecting the application. Learned counsel for the municipality states that a proposal has been made to the Government seeking revision of the scheme and orders are awaited and that the petitioner's application could be re-considered in the light of such revision, if the petitioner re-submits the same. To facilitate that, Ext.P2 is quashed and the municipality will decide afresh on Ext.P1, if it is presented on revision of the scheme. The writ petition is ordered accordingly, without entering on merits. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.19/12.