IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH JULY 2009 / 7TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 21039 of 2009(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.S. SAGARAN, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O. SREEDHARAN, CHATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, THUMBOOR P.O., MALA, THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE THRISSUR.\ 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAVARATTY, THRISSUR DIST. 3. JAYAN, S/O. KUMARAN, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, PARAMBANTHALI, MULLASSERY P.O., THRISSUR DIST.-09. 4. SUNIL, S/O. ARIYANKKARA VELAYUDHAN, ARIYANKAARA HOUSE, PARAMBANATHALI, MULLASSERY P.O.., THRISSUR DIST. -09 5. BALAN, ELAYIDATHU HOUSE, PARAMBANTHALI, MULLASSERY P.O., THRISSUR DIST. -09. 6. SAJITH KUMAR, S/O. KARANAMKOTTY BHASKARAN, KARANOMKOTTU HOUSE, PARAMBANCHALI, MULLASSERI P.O., THRISSUR -09 BY ADV. SRI.SHAIJAN C.GEORGE FOR R3-6 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.A.SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C) No.21039 of 2009 EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LICENCE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER'S SHOP NO. 46/2009-2010 DT. 9.7.2009 EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT DT. 21.7.2009. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE FIRST RESPONDENT DT. 24.7.2009 //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. P.R.RAMAN & P.BHAVADASAN, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.21039 of 2009 ------------------------------- Dated this the 29th July, 2009 J U D G M E N T Raman, J. This writ petition is filed seeking police protection. 2. We have issued notice to party respondents and they have entered appearance. We heard the parties as also the learned Government Pleader. 3. It appears that though there is Dharna, the same is stated to be peaceful. In such circumstances, there is no necessity to direct any protection being given. However, if there is any physical obstruction, certainly, the police will interfere and remove such obstruction. But this will not affect the peaceful Dharna, if any, conducted by the parties. The writ petition is closed with the above observations. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE P.BHAVADASAN , JUDGE. nj.