mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.73 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (STAMP) NO.62 OF 2009 Mrs.Saidat Namakula Applicant versus Union of India & another Respondents Atul Sarpande for applicant. Y.S.Shinde, APP for State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 30th January 2009 PC : 1. Heard advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the second respondent. The advocate for the applicant states that he had served notice to the first respondent-Union of India. Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Delay is condoned. The application is allowed. (A.S.OKA, J.) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL (STAMP) NO.62 OF 2009 Mrs.Saidat Namakula Applicant versus Union of India & another Respondents Atul Sarpande for applicant. Y.S.Shinde, APP for State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 30th January 2009 PC : 1. Admit. Learned APP waives service for second respondent. Counsel for the appellant states that at this stage he is not pressing for the relief of bail. 2. Hearing of the appeal is expedited. Liberty to file private paper book. Liberty to apply after paper book is filed and record is received. (A.S.OKA, J.)