IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 11753 of 2008 Decided on: 23rd December, 2010. Het Ram. …Petitioner. -Versus- Himachal Pradesh Housing and Urban Development Authority and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents. : None. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that though he had completed 10 years’ continuous service, however, his case has not been considered for regularization. It has come in the reply that the petitioner has not completed 8 years’ continuous service as on 31.03.2000. 2. Mr. R.D. Kaundal, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client is still in employment of the respondent- Board and had completed more than 10 years’ continuous service with 240 days in each calendar year. 3. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioner for conferment of work charge status/regularization immediately after completion of 10 years’ uninterrupted service with 240 days in each calendar year with all consequential benefits, 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 23, 2010. (bhupender) - 3 -