IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-12736 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 17.11.2011 Harpreet Singh and others …Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents ………. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Salil Bali, Advocate, for the petitioners Mr. Raghubir Chaudhary, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Mr. O.P. Goyal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Varun Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.2. *** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Perusal of the record would reveal that vide earlier order dated 12.07.2011, passed by this Court, petition was directed to be allowed, quashing the criminal proceedings pursuant to the FIR in question. However, matter was directed to be listed on the request of the complainant that petitioners have not retuned the original certificates of the complainant. Mr. O.P. Goyal, learned Senior Advocate, for respondent No.2 states that suit for mandatory injunction for returning the documents is pending before civil court, therefore, his request for returning the documents in present petition does not survive. Petition stands disposed of. ( Alok Singh ) November 17, 2011 Judge Anand