IS TBE M&E@a ERAE^B ABMISISTR&1IVS 'rEIBBBAI. M JABS.P?E i| oA.yo.. 6£VL,1GIST B.E..Saha son of Sbri B.Sehu, aged 5S.s-ea^| Et%iloynienfe Offl.cer, 'EJnlversl'fcy a . ' ' ot; Burean, Baipur -Versv-s- • ioa-applicaatg l.'State of Madhya ELradesh SESfOlinm'S'Ss Tbroagh tb.eSeoretary, Man Eowe'E' PlEnalrig Sep artBigal; , QovevB.mQnt ot'&.!, Btopal. . g. Tbe Birectoi?, Saployment; & Training, 9 Civic Geja.bre Madh.ats3.,Satialpur APPI.IG&TIOB li/S 18 QF'.TES ADKEHXSTB&'EI^S 2BIBuS S AGT.SS !|m <1-"-••>-"- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH_AT_£ILASPU_R WRTT PETmON (S) No. 669 of2Q05 ^PLICANT NON-APPLICANTS RESPONTtENTS D.L-Sahu. VERSUS State ofMadhva Pradesh & another. .4PPLICATION U/S 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBL!NALS ACT. 1985. SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri, J. Present: None for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyerforthe State. M i:(; Amit ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 23rd day of September, 2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In view ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy ofthis order to the petitioner, forthwith. Satisit K. Agnihotri -;^ a