In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh F.A.O. No. 3244 of 2008 Date of decision: August 06, 2009 Bohati Devi and another .. Appellants Vs. Prem Chand Singla and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Ms. Ekta Thakur, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Ravinder Arora, Advocate for the Insurance Company. A.N. Jindal, J Learned counsel for the appellants has stated that since the income of the appellants is proved to be more than Rs.40,000/- per annum, therefore, she may be allowed to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act. In view of the matter, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file the claim petition afresh under the appropriate provisions of law. August 06, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge