1 caa1596 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1596 OF 2010 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1295 OF 2010 Ms Shila Mehta & Anr. ...Applicants vs. Prabha W/o Vinodkumar Yadav ...Respondent Mr.Prakash Shinde a/w Mr.A.S.Gautama i/b M.Dhruva & Partners for the applicants Mr.Satish Mishra i/b Mr.A.M.Saraogi for the respondent CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : FEBRUARY 21,2011 P.C.: 1 The learned counsel for the respondent seeks time to file a reply. Time cannot be granted as on 19th November 2010, time of eight weeks was already granted to the respondent. At the time of admission of appeal, ad- interim relief has been granted on 19th November 2010. The said ad-interim relief deserves to be continued as interim relief. Accordingly, application is disposed of by directing that ad-interim relief granted on 19th November 2010 will continue to operate as interim relief. 2 It is made clear that pendency of this appeal in this Court will not operate as stay to the proceedings of the suit and the trial Court is free to proceed with the hearing of the suit. JUDGE