PETITIONER/: (Appellant) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR WritPetifion (Art. 2271 No.1548of 2010 Pradeep Uppal S/o Jeet Uppal aged about 48 years R/o Badabazar Mungeli Tahsil Mungeli District Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS: Versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Deputy Registrar Mungeli District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Jeet Uppal (Died and deleted) {Writ petition underArticle 227ofthe Constitution of India} Present: Miss Deepali Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advocate forthe State/respondent No.1. Soma Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma. J ORDER (28-9-2011) 1. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged legality and propriety of the order dated 7-3-2009 passed by the Board of Revenue, Bilaspur in Appeal Case No.A/02/SA/B- 105/278/07. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that originally, the property was sold by respondent No.2 in favour of the petitioner, but now respondent No.2, father of the petitioner, has died and the petitioner has succeeded the property as heir. Therefore, execution of sale deed is neither necessary nor possible on account of death of respondent No.2 and the right accrued in favour of the petitioner. In the circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition as having become infructuous. 3. The petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. Sd/- XR Sharma Judge