1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 7938/2010 Rambai & ors Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 18.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Aatish Jain - for the petitioners Mr GS Rathore - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that main allegations exist against Shantia and Harchand for causing offence under section 326 IPC. Petitioner himself is an injured. Allegation does not exist against him for causing injury to injured Leelaram .Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner may be granted bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After considering rival submissions of the parties and 2 without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioners deserve to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioners namely; Rambai, Munshi and Moolchand may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 200/2010 registered at Police Station – Kathumar, Alwar for offence under Section/s 143, 341, 323, 451 and 326 IPC provided, each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for their appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma