^.. ^^- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 328 of2001 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS RAMA SHANKAR PANDEY Son of Shri Mohan Lal Pandey, Dailway Wages Employee, Assistant Grade-3, Public Works Department, Sub-DivisionNo. 1, Jagdalpur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. STATE OF CHHATnSGARH, Through: Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur C.G. 2. STATE ADMIMSTRATIVE TRIBUNAL OF MADHYA PRADESH, RAIPUR, Through the Registrar, Raipur C.G. 3. ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, Publie Works Departtiiesit, C.G. 4. CHIEF ENGINEER (EAST), Public Works Department, Raipur C.G. WRIT PETFTON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA. Coram : Hon'ble Shri Jagdish BhaUa, Acting GhiefJustice & Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J. Present: Shri Ratan Pusty, Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri U.N.S.Deo, Govenmient Advocate for the State/respondent No.l,3and4. ORALORDER (Passed on 1 ltn day ofDecember, 2007) The following order ofthe Court was passed by Hoii^ble Jagdish BhaBa, Actfaig C.J.: Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner informs that the case of the petitioner is under consideration for regularisation. Therefore, he does not want to press this petition. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach this Court- ifso advised. Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice Amit / Sahu Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge