1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5225 OF 2003 State of Maharashtra .. Applicant Versus Sudhir @ Rahul Kundalik Chavan .. Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5226 OF 2003 State of Maharashtra .. Applicant Versus Uday @ Dadya Jaysing Dhavan .. Respondent Mr.S.S.Pednekar, A.P.P. for Applicant Mr.A.B.Vagyani for respondent. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 5th December 2005. P.C. . Mr.Vagyani appearing for respondent states that the trial in sessions case No.80 of 2003 is virtually concluded. Matter is now at the stage of arguments. This fact is not denied 2 by A.P.P.. 2. In my view, considering the above fact, no useful purpose will be served by entertaining this application for quashing and setting aside an order dated 22nd May 2003 passed by the sessions court enlarging respondent on bail. Application dismissed. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)