IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 18TH MAY 2010 / 28TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 15065 of 2010(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- R.K.SULOCHANA, HEADMISTRESS, THERUR U.P.SCHOOL, POST EDAYANNUR, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE MANAGER, THERUR U.P.SCHOOL, POST EDAYANNUR, KANNUR. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THALASSERY, KANNUR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.DILIP MOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 15065 of 2010 G ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 18th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T Ext.P4 is a statutory appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order passed by the 1st respondent, before the 2nd respondent. The Manager as per order dated 02-11-2009(Ext.P3) imposed the penalty of barring of three increments on the petitioner. Ext.P4 has been preferred feeling aggrieved by the said imposition of penalty. Ext.P4 being a statutory appeal, the 2nd respondent is bound to consider the same and pass orders thereon. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 appeal, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge