u cr^ ^o&j— IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S| N0. /-(0^<T— /20Q6 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^" y \^y^ ^^ "**' \r^.-*' l-> .<*" .*• -/'" ^f^y .^sy ^yy "y M.M. Patel, S/o. Shri Babu Lal ' Patel, aged about 48 years, Occupation Sub-Engineer, Water Resources DeRartment, R/o.- Kelo Vihar Raigarh, Tehsil & District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh," Through Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Secretary, ^ Panchayat & Gramin Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. ChiefExecutive Officer,- Janpad Panchayat Bhopal Pattnani, District Dantewada (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBXTION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRBCTION^»R ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER XI-HC-22 SfI^T^ f^IRiSf^TT shli»h(rf?cT Soma H^ 3^'^ITqT^ra', w<^wi6, Rfciiyy 3Tf^?T^a<sh ^-^l^,;p:^e:'{/o/&/.<. W»<'tlvhW*''r"""""""n<'VV^ 200 f^% STI^T ??tiTW (ril(T 08-08-2006 counsel Janfjiad Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, Shri SumeshBajaj.Govt. and 2, on advance copy, y Heard. By the instant writ petition India, the petitioner has challengl (Annexure-P/1), passed by respond|er transferred from Raigarh to Dantewada. Learned counsei for the petition only to Ihe extent that) representation to respondent Nc). Department, therefore, respondejit representation of the petitioner to State/ respondent No. 1 and 2 has Having heard leamed couns) facts and circumstances of the cas4, the petitioner appears to be just, faijr No.2 is directed to decide the thirty days from the date of receipt WiSh the aforesaici directionsj Consequently, iyi.(W.). P. No| Parties are entitled for certifi^d Aijivocate uilider Article 226/227 of the Constitution of ^d tiis transfer order dated 30.06.2006 i|ent No.2 whereby the petitioner has been Panchayat: Bhopatpatnam, District: ot <M<l?Cl'i(1-1 t|]t)C)T^'te^tl(:3t^H ^arf^iTsn^r for ihe petitioner. for the State/ respondenfs No. rlo pe|fitioner submits that he is pressing this the petitioner has already made a 1.2 for his repatriation to the parent No.2 be directed to decide the jwhich learned counsel appearing for the objection. for the parties and having regard to the the prayer made by learned courisel for iijr and reasonable. Therefore, respondent api|esentation made by the petiironer w'rthin df a copy of this order. the writ petition stands disposed of. (3121/2006 aiso stands disposed of. copy of this order. L.C. Bhadoo ' Judge (•M^f^)