HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No. 1333 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 1492 of 2010 challenging the order dated 26.12.2009 issued by the Tahsildar, Pamidimukkala Mandal, the 1st respondent herein. The writ petition was disposed of on 2.2.2010 directing that the order dated 26.12.2009 shall be treated as show cause notice and further proceedings be taken in the light of the explanation that may be offered by the petitioner. It appears that the 1st respondent prevented the petitioner from catching the fish in the tank, which is the subject matter of the writ petition. Therefore, he sought permission of the 1st respondent to catch the fish. After referring to the orders of this Court, the 1st respondent issued a notice dated 18.5.2010 stating that the order of this Court is silent as to catching of fish and though the petitioner can water the tank, he cannot catch the fish. Hence, this contempt. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. The last sentence of the notice dated 18.5.2010 issued by the 1st respondent is totally untenable and runs contrary to the orders of this Court. After realizing that he ought not to have made that observation, the 1st respondent seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the notice. Permission is accorded and the said notice shall stand withdrawn. The 1st respondent shall conclude the enquiry as directed by this Court, within a period of four weeks. He shall not interfere with the rights of the petitioner to harvest the fish tank, which in turn, shall be subject to the rights of the concerned parties. The contempt case is accordingly closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY,J DATE: 25.10.2010 pnb