3S^^^\ T^ ^^^•r?^ ^ <-1<^/---""\::>v ^. ^ .^ 91e^. ..--•"" V"? v -^ /-L . ^ , '. iSsagi® AaK8*' ~0^~ I1 Uf THE^HGH COtJRT_OF'<Jl?IMCATUBEAT BILASFIBI CHBATIIS6ARH WMT PE'HrEI€ F(S»N03°^/mn PETFTIONER RESPONBENTS WRITCT^TTB Raffi Bfliari Singh, Aged aboat 56 Years, S/0- Sfari UdaBiram, R/o- Amdata, TeIisil-Amera,- Distt. Smguja, C.G. Versus ^" DistrtctCoopeiativeCentraIBankMaryadit, TfaroBgfc- CluefExecutive Oflgcer, ArialGdapir,Dt^riG<-Sui®qa,CXj. •< sn^i w W W Sft^V **<]<* Tumane ^^ ^NKI^, ®x)l-H<lfi,|sjdl'(-l^< \^1,?,(^)(^>.-^ o^/^l thNi* ® sn^'??TRR? (liciid°l'itT) (WIW ?lfef Sllt^I SB : Hon'bl^Shri Manindra Mohan Bhrivastava, J. 17-06-2011 Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, couns Heard. By this petition, the petitioner validity of order dated 19-05-2011(/ Executive Officer, District Co-operati^ District Surguja, by which, the p^ suspension, Though, the petitioner has correctness and validity of the petittoner has alternative and prefer dispute as provided under Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, b^j Registrar or before the I do not find any extra-ordinar^ exercise of power oonferred under Liberty is reserved to the petitioner 55(2) ofthe Madhya Pradesh Co-ope( competent authority. for the petjtioner. cjalls in question the oorrectness and ^jnnexure P-1) passed by the Chief i^ Central Bank Limited, Ambikapur, ^titioner has been plaoed under Reserving the aforesaid liberty, '^t^f?Tifr;T 't?TO^ff ^f fs^ <MI^|'(. ^; siRnsn^T raised several grounds to assail of suspension, I find that the remedy statutory in nature to 55 (2) ofthe Madhya Pradesh filing a service dispute before the for the purpose. reason to entertain the petition in 226 of the Constitution of tndia. file service dispute under Section ative Societies Aot, 1960 before the orcter effioadous Sedtion competent aut(iority appointed Artiole tb the petition is disposed off. Sd-/ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava •T^ Judge 3 1—1.