1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. CC) N0. :2 9712i2006 / Anil Kumar Dubey S/o Shri Chintaram Dubey aged about 41 R/o Village— Gobaripat Kota Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) PETITIONER$ I’d /1 State of Chhattisgarh Through — the Secratary General Administration Department D.K.S. Building Raipur (C.G.) Collector Bilaspur , Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/ 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI5GARH AT BILAW W, P, (5) N0, 7572 0f 2006 Pefi‘fioner : Anil Kumm‘ Dubey Versus Respondents : Stafe of Chhamsgurh and another $3: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sc‘l'ish K. Agnihofri. J Mrs. Renu Kochnr, Advocate for The petitioner. Mr. Safish Gupfo, Depu'ry 6overnmen'r Advooofe for The respondents/Side. O R D E R (Pa-med on fhis 10’“ day of January, 2007) 1‘ Learned counsel appearing for fhe pemioner as well as learned Depany Govemmen‘r Advocule appearing for ihe respondenls/5m join'l‘ly submil 1M1 lhe fools of The present rm? we similar to mi of in Wrii Peli'lion 2544 of 2003 (Shalik Ram Pmdey Vs. Slate of Chhoffisgorh du another), which was disposed of vide order doled 29.8.2003. They further submi‘l that 1he question of low involved is also ‘l'hesnme. y 2. In view of 1he above slated submissions mode by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order daied 29.8.2003 passed by this Conn in wm Petition 2544 of 2003. The petitioner is granted liberty to make o representation. The some shall be considered, as early as possible, preferably, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. No order as l l l Satish Sd/ K. Agnihairi l l, Judge to costs. Bablu l