IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2444 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 28, 2010 Hari Dutt Thakur Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others. Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate, For the respondent s : Mr. R. K. Sharma, Senior Addl. Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 4. Mr. Ashok Thakur, Advocate, vice counsel for respondent No. 5. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner has essentially two grievances, one he has not been regularised in service despite fulfilling the required period of continuous service. This is also a grievance regarding counting of 50% of daily wages service for the purpose of pensionary benefits. As far as latter issue is concerned, it is covered by the judgment of this Court in State of Himachal Pradesh & ors Versus Sarab Dayal in CWP No. 180 of 2001 decided on 19.7.2007. As far as former is concerned the matter requires consideration of the fact and an order 2 by the Controlling Authority. Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of as follows. 2. Petitioner may file an appropriate writ petition regarding his regularisation on the basis of the policy framed by the Government, within a period of one month from today in which case appropriate order in accordance with law and with reference to the policy framed by the Government regarding regularisation and without discriminating the petitioner shall be passed by the competent authority within another two months. Depending upon the order thus passed by the competent authority the petitioner shall also be entitled to the benefits flowing from judgment in Sarab Dayal (supra), subject to its finality in the appeal now pending before the Supreme Court. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. May 28, 2010 (PK)