IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7905 of 1989 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA SD/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO 1 to 5 No -------------------------------------------------------------- JITENDRA N RAJGORE Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BP TANNA for Petitioner MS RV ACHARYA AGP for Respondent No. 1, 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA Date of decision: 20/04/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Heard learned senior counsel Mr.B.P.Tanna for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms.R.V.Acharya for the respondents. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner has restricted the prayers to reconsideration of the representations made by the petitioner vide his letters dated 11.7.1985, 4.2.1987 and 25.9.1989. The learned A.G.P. submitted that all these representations have been decided and the result has also been communicated to the petitioner. However, it was further submitted on behalf of the respondents that in view of the grievance that the decisions on the petitioner's representations were cryptic and following the judgment of this Court in Special Civil Application No.262 of 1980 (Coram N.H.Bhatt, J.) delivered on 17.4.1980 (a copy of which was referred by Mr.Tanna), the respondents may reconsider the aforementioned representations of the petitioner. In view of this stand of the respondent, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would neither press for any other relief at this stage nor insist upon personal hearing before deciding the representations. Accordingly, it is directed that the aforesaid representations of the petitioner shall be reconsidered and decision thereon shall be communicated to the petitioner within a reasonable time. Rule is made absolute in the above terms with no order as to costs. Sd/- 20.4.2001 ( D.H.Waghela, J.) (KMG Thilake)