IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2011 / 19TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26689 of 2011(I) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. NOEL THOMAS ALEX, THEGUMTHOTTATHIL HOUSE, AZHOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA -689645 2. PAULCY PAUL, PUTHENPURACKAL HOUSE, COMPANYPADY, KANNARA P.O., THRISSUR - 680652 3. REJIT.M.ANTONY, MALIAKAL HOUSE, MARINE JUNCTION, WATERLAND ROAD , CHIRACKAL , PALLURUTHY, KOCHI -682006 4. SONY SEBASTIAN, KOODARAPPILLY HOUSE, THIRUMUPPAM, OLANADKARA, VARAPUZHA P.O., ERNAKULAM-683517 5. TONIS THOMAS, CHAMAPPARAMBIL HOUSE, MANJOOR SOUTH P.O., KOTTAYAM -686603 BY ADV. SRI.B.RAGUNATHAN SRI.P.KARTHIKEYAN SRI.R.SRINATH SRI.NIKHIL GEORGE (PALAKKAPPILLIL) SRI.VIPIN VARGHESE RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR, M.G. UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM - 686560 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, M.G.UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM - 686560 BY ADV. T.A.SHAJI, SC, FOR UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: MM WP(C).No. 26689 of 2011(I) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF APPLICATION DT. 4-10-2011 FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY 1st PETITIONER P2 COPY OF APPLICATION DT.04-10-2011 FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY 2nd PETITIONER P3 COPY OF APPLICATION DT. 04-10-2011 FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY 3rd PETITIONER P4 COPY OF APPLICATION DT.04-10-2011 FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY 4th PETITIONER P5 COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 04-10-2011 FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY 5th PETITIONER RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE MM ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).26689/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 11th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of the failed subjects in the 6th semester B.Tech Examination vide Exts.P1 to P5 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within six weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs