IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45453 of 2008 RAM PRAVESH PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6 8.9.2009 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the Counsel appearing for the Opposite party no.2. Counsel appearing for the Opposite party no.2 submits that in protection of this Court’s order the petitioner has filed a matrimonial case making allegation against the character of the petitioner. Counsel for Opposite party no.2 further submits that as per direction of this Court a date was fixed before the Court below for appearance of both the parties so that petitioner may take his wife to her matrimonial home. Opposite party no.2 appeared but the petitioner did not appear. Considering this fact that petitioner taking advantage of this Court’s order, is playing hide and seek, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected in Complaint case no. 527 of 2008. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar