IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.10352 of 2011 Date of Decision : July 13, 2011. Manjinder Singh Boparai and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.G.S.Bal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Charu Tuli, Sr.DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Ms.Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioners who are retired/serving S.S.Masters/Mistress/ JBT Teachers/Drawing-Science Teachers/Mistresses in the Education Department, Government of Punjab, seek a mandamus to direct the respondents to take into consideration the service rendered by them in the Government Aided Privately Managed Schools as qualifying service for the CWP No.10352 of 2011 [2] purpose of pensionary benefits on their retirement from the Government service. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this case stands settled by a decision dated 10.3.2010 rendered by this Court in CWP No.14238 of 1991 (Sukhdev Singh and others versus State of Punjab and others). The present writ petition is accordingly allowed in terms of the afore-stated order dated 10.3.2010 passed in Sukhdev Singh's case (supra). Dasti. July 13, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE