IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29009 of 2010 CHHOTUA @ CHHOTU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10. 08. 2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody in a case registered under Sections 399/402 of the Indian Penal Code and 25 (1-B) A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. It is alleged that 250 grams of explosive powder was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that charge sheet was submitted without sanction and without chemical analyst report. Moreover, the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, a statement to that effect has been made in paragraph 7 of the petition. It is further submitted that other accused persons from whom arms and other articles were recovered have been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 17614/10 and Cr. Misc. No. 20564/10. Learned counsel for the State submits that explosive power was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Considering the period of custody and petitioner having no criminal antecedent and other accused persons having granted bail, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, Patna City, in connection with S.T. No. 872/10 arising out of 2 Khajekalan P.S. Case No. 3/10. m.p. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)