1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 93 OF 2010 (Manohar S. Mungle vs. Presiding Officer, (Additional) School Tribunal, Nagpur & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JANUARY 28, 2010. Heard Shri Bari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Kothari, learned AGP for respondents No. 1 & 4 and Shri Bhandarkar, learned counsel for respondent No.2. The contention is, the petitioner – School Committee did not pass any resolution appointing Respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 never joined the services and Muster Roll (Attendance register) does not show his signatures as employee of school. It is further argued that the documents produced before School Tribunal were bogus and fabricated. Shri Bhandarkar, learned counsel relies upon the consideration of the issue by the School Tribunal. With the assistance of both counsel, I have perused the judgment. The School Tribunal has made reference to various documents and concluded that had Respondent No.2 not been in service, he would not have been in a position to sign those documents or to issue the books. The School Tribunal has also found that 2 fabrication of such records was not possible. I do not find anything wrong with the conclusions reached by the School Tribunal. The petitioner has not pointed out to the School Tribunal that somebody else was working with the School as Librarian. That is not the shown even in present writ petition. Hence, no case is made out warranting any interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.