1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6377 OF 2009 Sarang s/o. Avinash Shah R/o. Paranda, Tq. Paranda, Dist. Osmanabad. ....Petitioner. Versus The Administrator, Late Bhagyashree Patil Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd. Lohara, Branch Paranda, Tq. Paranda, Dist. Osmanabad and others ....Respondents. Shri. S.M. Vibhute, Advocate for petitioner. CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 9th June, 2010. PER COURT : 1. By this writ petition the petitioner challenges recovery certificate issued under section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. There is an alternate remedy available under section 154 of Civil Procedure Code. 2. The learned counsel for petitioner submits that 50% amount has 2 to be deposited as a condition precedent for preferring the revision application. He further submits that he has paid entire amount and therefore, it would be unjust to deposit 50% amount. 3. The requirement of the law has to be complied with. Whether the appellant has paid the entire amount or not, that would be examined by the revisional Court. The statutory/alternate remedy under section 154 of C.P.C. is available. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed on that count. No order as to costs. [ R.K. DESHPANDE, J. ] ssc/wp6377.09