1 2 S.B. CIVIL WRIT CONTEMPT PETITION NO.269/2006. IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4529/2002. Fakru & Ors. Vs. Abdul Gani Khan & Ors. Date of Order :: 28th August 2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. Rajesh Parihar for Mr. Manish Shishodia, for the petitioners. Mr. B.R. Mehta ] Mr. J.S. Rao ], for the respondents. ..... BY THE COURT: This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioners in CWP No. 4529/2002 with reference to the interim order dated 14.11.2002 as confirmed on 08.02.2005 in the said writ petition complaining that despite such stay order, the respondents were trying to dispossess the petitioners and FIRs were also required to be lodged by the petitioners on 09.06.2005 and on 16.06.2005. The respondents have filed reply to this contempt petition with the submissions that the possession of the land in question through process of law had already been taken on 10.11.2002 and the petitioners have made false complaints. The said writ petition has been disposed of by a separate order today and the impugned orders as passed by the Estate Officer and District Judge have been set aside and 2 the matter has been remanded to the Estate Officer for decision afresh with directions for maintaining status quo as existing today till decision by the Estate Officer. Having regard to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court finds no reason to initiate any contempt proceedings in this matter with reference to the uncertain allegations as made by the petitioners and, for the matter having been remanded to the Estate Officer, there does not appear any justification to continue with this contempt petition any further. The contempt petition is, therefore, rejected and the notices are discharged. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. Mohan/