IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 50 of 2011 Praveen Kumar Singh ...Petitioner Versus Uttarakhand Public Service Commission, Gurukul Kangri, Haridwar. …Respondent. Present : Mr. Anil Dabral, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B. D. Kandpal, Advocate for the respondent. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Sri Anil Dabral, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri. B. D. Kandpal, Advocate for the respondent. The petitioner moved an application before the respondent commission for declaration of result for the post of Lecturer (Political Science) in Government Inter College. Since the application filed by the applicant was not received by the Public Service Commission in time, he was not permitted to appear in the interview. Vide an interim order of this Court dated 17.01.2011, the petitioner was allowed to appear in the interview. The petitioner subsequently appeared in the interview but his result has not been declared. According to the Public Service Commission the result has not been declared, as the matter is sub judice before this Court. Now he relies upon a decision of a Division Bench of this Court dated 16.3.2011 passed in Sanjay Kumar Kumiyal and another vs. Narendra Singh Gahtori vs. Uttarakhand Public Service Commission and others (Special Appeal No. 24 of 2011) wherein the late applications filed by the applicants have not been entertained as it would amount to change in advertisement condition. There is no dispute regarding the law laid down by this Court on the matter. However, there is presently a 2 special equity in favour of the petitioner inasmuch he had appeared in the interview. The petitioner further states that he is confident about his success in the examination. In the interest of both equity and justice his result must be declared. Uttarakhand Public Service Commission is directed to declare the result of the petitioner forthwith. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 25.5.2011 Avneet