@ HIGH CGURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASHJR K. GNIHOTRI . SB. z HON’BLE MR. SATISH PETITIONER Dr. Shrikant Rajimwale S/o PRRajimwale Yasihwant G.E.Road, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS .: L Municipal RESPONDENTS Corpoxatioo Through Commissioner, Raipur (C.G.) 2. State of Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, Advocate Advocate for respondent No. 1. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Deputy Advo No. 2. ORDER (Deepak Kumar Shrivastava Vs. that of in WP. (Q) No. 257 of 2007 same terms and cooditicos. 2. No ordxer as to costs. Amit W.RI .__T._P_ET._IT_10_N_ 1m.o..114§of2007 Age 45 years R/o H0$pitaL Tatyapara. Clthattiegarh Through— Collector, Raipur (06.) Present: Smt. Kiran Mayee Nayak, Advocate with Shri C.R.Sahu, with Shri Kashtf Shakeel, Gate Geoerai with Shri (Passed on 29th of March, 2007) #M. Sd/— _ ‘ ‘ Satish K.Agnihotn 9 Judge Utkarsh Verma, Deputy Govemment Advocate. for respondent 1. In this petition, the facts arid questions of law involved are the same as Municipal Corporation, Raipur & another) which has been disposed of today i.e. 29‘h of March, 2007. This petition stands disposed of in the A J