IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7240 of 2008 Between: M.A. Zainoddin S/o K.H. Khan Pangal-509120, Mahabubnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Mahabubnagar, Mahabubnagar district 2 The Station House Officer, P.S. Pangal, Mahabubnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.Mohd.AFZAL Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to register cases against the alleged culprits mentioned in complaints dated 20-04-2007, 24-04- 2007, 09-08-2007, 04-09-2007 and 01-03-2008 respectively. The petitioner also sought for a direction to respondent No.2 not to interfere in disputes of civil nature related to Jawahar Talent School of Pangal, Mahabubnagar District. Heard Sri Mohd.Afzal, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. A reading of the affidavit, filed in support of the Writ Petition, shows that a spate of complaints was given by the employees of the petitioner-Management against many persons, and the grievance of the petitioner is that despite giving of those complaints, respondent No.2 has not registered any crime so far, in respect of any of those complaints. His further grievance is that respondent No.2 is interfering with the disputes raised by certain employees of Jawahar Talent School regarding non-payment of salaries etc. As regards the first part of the relief claimed by the petitioner, I am not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition, because under Section 190 r/w Section 200 Cr..P.C., the petitioner has an effective remedy of approaching the jurisdictional Magistrate with a private complaint, if respondent No.2 has not taken action on the complaints made on behalf of the abovementioned school. I do not, therefore, see any reason to entertain this Writ Petition, when an effective remedy referred to above is available to the petitioner. With regard to the alleged interference by respondent No.2 in disputes of civil nature, it is required to be observed that unless a crime is registered on the complaints given by the employees of the school in question, there is no justification for him to interfere on the issue of non-payment of salaries etc., by the said school. Subject to the above observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.9505 of 2005 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 3rd April, 2008 lur