IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2222 of 2007 BISHUNDEO PRASAD YADAV son of late Tarni Prasad Mandal Resident of village Chakala (Shripur), P.S.Mathia, District Madhepura------------------------petitioner Versus 1.The State of Bihar through the Law Secretary, Department of Law, Old Secretariat namely Shri Yogendra Prasad 2.The Law Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat namely Shri Yogendra Prasad 3.The Agriculture Production Commissioner (now known as Principal Secretary) Department of Agriculture, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Vikash Bhawan,Patna Namely Shri N.S.Madhawan 4.The Addl. Secretary, Department of Agriculture, New Secretariat, Vikash Bhawan, Patna namely Shri Rai Pramod Kumar 5.The Director, Department of Agriculture, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, New Secretariat, Vikash Bhawan,Patna Namely Shri Raghvendra Pal Singh 6.The Joint Director of Agriculture (Plant Protection) Govt. of Bihar, Mithapur Agriculture Farm, Patna Namely Shri Satya Narayan Mochi 7.The Deputy Director (Administration), Department of Agriculture, New Secretariat, Vikash Bhawan, Patna Namely Shri Avinash Kumar Kanth 8.Shri Vishwanath Thakur, the then Deputy Director (Administration) Department of Agriculture, Govt. of Bihar and now presently posted as Sub-Divisional Officer, Samastipur, Dist. Samastipur—opp.parties ----------- 2. 7.9.2009 No one appears for the petitioner. The petitioner claims wilful disobedience by the opposite parties of the order dated 8.9.2004 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 10839 of 1998 of this Court. Essentially the grievance of the petitioner is that although both the writ petitions of this petitioner and one Dinesh Rajak were dismissed by a common order dated 8.9.2004 and also L.P.A. filed by the said Dinesh Rajak was also dismissed yet the 2 authorities have allowed the said Dinesh Rajak to function on the higher post. Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits on the basis of the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party no.6, the Joint Director of Agriculture (Plant Protection), Government of Bihar that on account of wrong advice earlier given by the Law Department the said Dinesh Rajak’s reversion was cancelled and subsequently on the basis of reconsideration of the said advice he has been reverted from the post of Clerk to the post of Kamdar and thus no grievance can be raised by the petitioner in the matter. The order dated 20.6.2008 (Annexure-A) reverting the said Dinesh Rajak has also been brought on the record. In the above circumstances, the contempt application is dismissed. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) spal/