THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.3440 of 2010 ORAL ORDER: It appears, petitioner and respondents 5 to 9 had filed appeal under Section 4-A(2) of A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1997 (for short ‘the Act’) before the first respondent being aggrieved by the orders passed by fourth respondent dated 4.8.2006 as confirmed by third respondent vide orders dated 24.2.2007. According to the petitioner, along with the said appeal, he also filed an application in March, 2007 seeking suspension of the orders passed by fourth respondent dated 4.8.2006 as well as orders of the third respondent dated 24.2.2007. When the said application was not taken up, he also filed Writ Petition before this Court and this Court while disposing of the said writ petition, directed the first respondent to dispose of the stay application within two weeks from the date of receipt of the order by clarifying that the appeal filed by the petitioner may be treated as Revision under Section 4-B of the Act. Now the grievance of the petitioner is that in spite of there being a direction from this Court, neither the stay petition is disposed of nor the revision is taken up. According to the petitioner, in the meanwhile, the petitioners were dispossessed and the land was resumed for the purpose of providing house sites to the weaker sections. The learned counsel for petitioner states that at least if the revision is disposed of deciding the rights of the petitioner, he may get some compensation. It is unfortunate that in spite of there being a direction from this Court, neither the stay petition was disposed of nor the revision is taken up. Under those circumstances, the respondents are directed to dispose of the revision filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the orders passed by fourth respondent dated 4.8.2006 as confirmed by third respondent vide orders dated 24.2.2007 within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of this order, if not already disposed of. If the revision is already disposed, copy of the order may be furnished to the petitioner forthwith. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 17.2.2010 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.3440 of 2010 17.2.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.3440 of 2010 Date: 17th February, 2010 Between: Rangu @ Kodi Durgaiah .. Petitioner And The District Collector, Karimnagar district & others. .. Respondents