IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1144 of 2007 UPENDRA RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 30.7.2008. N.H./ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned judgment of acquittal. It appears from the judgment that only one witness has been examined on behalf of the prosecution. There was no corroborative evidence before the court below for conviction. Even victim has not been examined. The injury report was also not brought on the record. From above facts, it is quite apparent that the court below has rightly acquitted the opposite parties. I find no merit in this application. Accordingly, this application is rejected at the admission stage. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )