ff)gy^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BSLASPUR W.P. (S) No. 4657 of 2005 Petitioner Respondente 1. 2. Ashok Kumar Sathe, Son of Shri K. Y. Sathe, Lab. Technician, Govt. Science CoSlege, Wunge!!, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) SSate of Chhattisgarh, {hroagh the Secretary, Department of Higher Education, D. K. S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) The Commissioner, Hlgher Educafjon, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh The Principal, Govt. Science Coiiess, Mungeii, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) GRSGJNALA! JCATSON UNDER SCTION 19 OF THE M.P. •TATE ADM!NJSTRATiVEjR®UNALACT^S885 Single Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnjhotri, J. Shri wi Ali Asgar, Advocate forthe petitioner. >hri A. S. Kachvrah-a, Deputy Advocate Genera! for the respondents. ;^ii:;:S]-':-"-!T;?-:; 2. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 26th day of maroh, 2008) Wlth the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the matter i's heard finaliy. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Lab. Technician (eariier it was toiov/n as Lab AssisSant) on ad hoc basis by ordsr dated 19.11.1987 (Annexure P/2), passed by ttie Principal, Government Science Coliege, Mungeli (Bilaspur). The petftiGner continued as ad hoc Lab Technician tlil he was regufarized in service on 11.7.19^) (Annexure P/3). Learned counse! for the petitioner submits that the peffiioner is entitled to srant of annuai increments in view of Circuiar No. 'i^^^^^ '^ '^^J 4. l'a.R.'e'7't/QQ/p.nan?"-"!'/ '<ats?l IP.nSI i^jyfyA. i/^A./micin^c-inv ufii.^U lu.v^?. i ?3 i^Annexure A-4 'A'), issued by the Finance Department. tn view of the said cireular, the petitionsr seeks permission of this Court to make a representation before the concemed authorities for grant of annua! Increments, to which iearned counse! appearing for the respondents/State has no objectton. In She event a rspresentation ts made, e respondents authoritles may consider the same, in accordance wlth law, on its ov/n merits, wiftin a period of eight v/eete, from the date of receipt of the representation, if anv. In view of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of wth the above- stated tiberiy. No order asto costs. — ——- —— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^^i^NiiiaMss,.^- ^