IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No. 679 of 2007 1. RAMSAKHI SINGH, W/o Late Mukhdeo Singh, D/o Late Sathan Rao, 2. Anil Kumar Singh, 3. Sunil Kumar Singh, 4. Pradeep Kumar Singh and 5. Sandip Kumar Singh, All S/o Late Mukhdeo Singh, residents of English (Nauwadih), P.S. – Paharpur, Distt. – East Champaran ………………………………… Petitioners / Plaintiffs / Appellants. Versus SATYENDRA NARAIN SINGH, S/o Late Shankar Singh, R/o Village – English (Nauwadih), P.S. – Paharpur, Distt. – East Champaran …………….. Opposite Party / Defendant / Respondent. ----------- For the petitioner:- Mr. Awanish Kumar Pandey, Advocate. ----------- 5. 18.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application to enable him to take other remedial step against the impugned order in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Surya Dev Rai Vs. Ram Chander Rai & Ors., reported in (2003) 6 SCC 675 wherein it has been held that Civil Revision would not be maintainable in a case where a prayer of ad interim injunction or temporary injunction has been refused or allowed by the trial court and that order has either been affirmed or set aside by the appellate court. This court also in Uma Shankar & ors. Vs. Dr. Hamid Hussain & Ors., (Civil Revision No. 1377/2006, disposed of on 2 26.10.2009) followed the law laid down by the Apex Court and had taken the similar view. In the above view of the matter, permission is accorded. This Civil Revision is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioner to take other remedial step against the impugned order, which is available to under law. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )