1 Cri-A-11-2011.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 11 OF 2011 Shri Ganpat Manglya Keni ... Applicant (Orig. complainant) Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents Mr. Dilip Bodake, Advocate, for the applicant. Mrs. G.P.Mulekar, APP, for the respondent - State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 19th January, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP. 2. The applicant seeks cancellation of bail granted to the respondent No.2 by the trial Court in Crime No.197/2009 registered on the basis of the report lodged by the present applicant. The applicant is a builder, who carries on business in the name of Ashirwad Construction. According to him, respondent No.2 - Suhas Shinde and one Rashmikant Bhoir were his employees and they had falsely opened a fake account in the name of Ashirwad Construction and the amounts received by them were credited in that account. The report lodged by the present applicant shows that all the receipts about the amounts received in the 2 Cri-A-11-2011.sxw name of Ashirwad Construction were signed by Rashmikant. The trial Court, while granting bail, noted that there is no document to connect the present respondent No.2 with the commission of offence. 3. Learned Counsel for the applicant contends that the fake Bank account was opened by both the accused. However, he has not produced any document to show that the respondent No.2 was also involved in opening that fake account. 4. In view of this, I find no substance in the present application for cancellation of bail. The application is rejected. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)