IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11726 of 2005 1. BIJAY KUMAR PANDIT son of Sri Jagar Nath Pandit, resident of village – Gwalpara (Rahitola) P.S. Gwalpar, District – Madhepura. 2. Bipeen Kumar Poddar son of Sri Panna Lal Poddar, resident of village – Babupur, P S – Sabour, District-Bhagalpur. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Commissioner cum Secretary, Department of Administrative and Personnel Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Agriculture Production Commission through the Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Commissioner cum Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna. 6. The Deputy Secretary cum Director Administration, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna. 7. The Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bihar, Patna. 8. Additional Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna. 9. Under Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna. 10. The Secretary, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bihar, Patna. 11. The Controller of Examination, BPSC, Patna. 12. The Officer on Special Duty, BPSC, Patna. 13. The Deputy Secretary, BPSC, Patna. ----------- For the petitioners: Mr. Basant Kumar Chaudhary, Sr. Advocate. For the State: Mr. Giridhar Gopal Tiwary, AC to AAG-II. For the BPSC : Mr. Sanjay Pandey. ____ 06. 30.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the BPSC and learned counsel for the State. In terms of the earlier direction dated 20th March, 2007, learned senior counsel representing the petitioners informs the Court that names of these petitioners have been recommended by the BPSC for appointment. There is something to indicate that their medical has been held. The only thing left now is issuance of appointment letter. Learned senior counsel fort the petitioners informs the Court that letter of appointment has not been issued to the petitioners as yet. 2 Since majority of the formality has already been done in terms of the earlier direction of this Court, it is only hoped and expected that the orders of appointment will also flow in favour of the petitioners at an early date. The writ application is disposed of. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)