IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36340 of 2009 Avinash Kumar, Son of Sugriv Singh, resident of Village-Navi Nagar, Police Station-Nawada, District-Nawada ------- Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner : M/S. Kanhaiya Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate, and Mrs. Jyotasna, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ----------- 2 26-10-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that F.I.R. has been lodged against unknown persons, and petitioner’s name has surfaced subsequently on the basis of the confessional statement of co-accused before the police. It is submitted that the petitioner has not been put on T.I.Parade despite the fact that the informant claimed that he could identify the accused. It is submitted on behalf of the State that the informant was robbed of Rs.14 Lacs and a Mobile phone and the aforesaid mobile phone was recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Rs.1 Lac has also been recovered from the Puja Ghar of the father of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that there has been recovery of looted articles from the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. NKS/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)