CR No. 6532 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 6532 of 2009 Date of decision:- 13.10.2010 Paramjit Kaur ......petitioner vs. Raghbir Singh & others ......respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. Sandeep Khunger, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.S. Salar, Advocate for respondents HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) Plaintiff is in revision aggrieved against the orders passed by learned trial Court on 8.5.2009 and by the learned First Appellate Court on 19.9.2009, whereby an application for ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from alienating the suit property was dismissed. Plaintiff has claimed the estate of Teja Singh by way of natural succession as daughter whereas defendants are the sons of Teja Singh. Since the question of inheritance is in dispute, any sale by the defendants during the pendency of the suit shall be hit by the doctrine of lis pendence. Therefore, I do not find any case is made out for granting ad- interim injunction in favour of the plaintiff and restraining the defendants from alienating the suit property. In view of the above, I do not find any patent illegality or CR No. 6532 of 2009 -2- irregularity in the orders passed by the learned Courts below which may warrant any interference in the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. Revision stands dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 13.10.2010 preeti