S.B. Cr. Bail Application No. 399/2008 (Sher Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 11.02.2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. Vikas Bijrania for the petitioner. Mr. Narendra Moolchandani, P.P. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the order impugned. It appears from the order impugned that the test identification was held and the witnesses identified the petitioner. The case against the petitioner is of dacoity. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR. In the case of dacoity, when unknown persons commit the dacoity, there is no question of naming them in the FIR. It is only when the test identification parade is held, the dacoits are identified and their involvement prima-facie is shown. The order impugned shows that the petitioner was identified by the witnesses in the test identification. In the circumstances, therefore, no case for bail is made out. The bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp