—78 37I^?'^T^TN? ^sn^T^^TOt^ :^^:-' ^ /%?) -3^ ^^l<n^, ^nt<H<j<o, f^TRT^ ^TEi^iywiN? '^200 3TI^{ ^^ (.^{^^) ^TcTT^ ^lt^ S^T (SinQle Bench; Hon'blej W.P. s) No.471/2009 22|5 PETITEONER (Petition U/A Khageli. Kashy4p Versus ^1<4?<rj^ 'Wl^lf ^f fe^ T^F^R ^ 3:fRR 31lt¥T Mr. Justice Dhirendra Mishra) of Constitution of India) |swar, aged about 25 years, S/o Shri Ramjee R/o Village Chandipara, Tehsil Pamgarh, Oistri^t Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. RESPON&ENTS 1. S^ate of Chhattisgarh, Through : the S^cretary, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Panchayat & Scjcial Welfare bepartment, Mantralay, D.K.S. Bl^awan, Raipur (CG) 2. Tl^e Collector, - District Janjgir-Champa, Cl-jhattisgarh. 3. Cl^ief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pajngarh, bistn'ct Janjgir-Champa (CG) 4. Grjam Panchayat Bundela, Through: Secretary, 6r|am Panchayat Chandipara, Tehsil Pamgarh, &i ^tt JanjgJr-Champa (CG) Present: Mr. bhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Acl/ocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel LaJA/yer for the State. 27.01.2009 By this petition the peti- dated 20.2.2003 & 23.1.2003 services of the petitioner, who Guarantee Scheme, has been di|< has been passed without giving show cause notice to the petitio^er. noner is challenging the impugned orders (^assed by respondent No.3 & 4, whereby j^/as working as Gurji under the Education i|continued, on the ground that the same [^roper opportunity and without issuing any X^HC—78 1 t't^I'^T^W i^fl ^Ti^liCTNr ,./p' ^\_ 's^ ^ww^^ ^Ttl'M4i<o, f®«ni-H^< HSSPW S^HT^t •^200 ^W ^RF ( ^3^S^) 'P^IW^feT^I^T -Z.-1 Learned counsel for th< matter was decided by this Cou petitioners submits that the similar |-t vide order dated 30.9.2008 passed in W.P. No.5392/01 (Mahavir Raiscfear Vs. State of C.6. <& others) whereby the petition was disposed of wit| make representation before thej authority was directed to consicjer his case for appointment on the post of Shiksha Karrni. He further accordance with law. On the other hand, learni has no objection if the petition i '^i^fepft^fwq^ff ^f fe^t^l^f^R iR'3?RR 3?1^T liberty to petitioner of that petition to concerned authority and the concerned {submits that this petition may also be disposed with liberty to the p4titioner to moke representation to the concerned authority and the con|;erned authority be directed to consider the case of the petitioner fpr a^pointment as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III in d counsel for the State submits that he disposed of in the aforesaid terms. In view of the above subr^ission of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed cjf with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation along with cerj'ified copy of this order before the competent authority for appoin^ment as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III and on such representation being made,; same in accordance with law exp^ditiously. Certified copy as per rul^s. the competent authority shall decide the Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge y^^MVi-^-w-^f.,