IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.14886 of 2010 1. HARENDRA YADAV & 2. Arjun Yadav, both sons of Sheo Sagar Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 11.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and subsequently, his name was disclosed by one Munna Yadav, on account of which, the petitioner has been made accused in the present case as well as Bhorey P.S. case no.97 of 2009, let the petitioners, above named, who are in custody since 30.9.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, in connection with Bhorey P.S. case no.87of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse,(iii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date - 2 - fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv) that the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)