HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA$PUR Cr.M.P.NQ.456 of 2909 5mm of Chha‘tfisgarh, Thmugh the Disfric‘r Magis‘rrm‘e Biiaspur (C.&) Versus owapgligan? 1. Sm?.Champa Bai, W10 Late Panchmm Aged ubou‘r - 65 years, R/o Near Bus Sfand Kain, Thana Kofa, DIS‘r'i'Biias‘pur (Ge) And CAM P.No.45.7 arf 2009 5mm of Chhattisgarh, Through fha Disfr‘icf Magisfmw Biiaspur (C63 Versus SmiShakun‘tala Bai, W/o Nathumm, Aged abouf — 55 years, Dani Rum, 5/0 Pancln mm, Aged abnuf 4O years. Gavindq, 3/0 Nathumm, Aged about? 20 vear-s, Al! Q/o Kom, Them Knife. DisttBilaspur (C6) (Pefi‘riens under 5ec1‘ion 482 of Cr.P.C.) ($3: Hon'bie MwTP. Ehama, J.) Mr.5ushi! Dubey, GcvtAdvgcme far- ?he applicant. MnScmnafh Vermc, counse! for The non-anpiicam's. QRAL ORDER (Passed a, T" Decemher, 2099) The applicant/Sfcfe has filed The aforesaid peti‘rions under Sectim 482 of The Cr.P.C. for canceHctfion of bail gmnfed 1'0 new-applicanfs SmtChampg Bai, Sm‘r.5hak.nmia Bai, Deni Ram and Govinda vide order- dafed 11112008 passed by the Firs? Addifiond Sessicms Judge, Bilespur in Bail Applirn+inn N¢s41415lO8 and 1419/08. N QM ’2’— Learned coume! for fhe appHcanT/Smfe submifs that? +haugh trig! has R) been commenczd and fhe non—applicants are on bail since 11.112008, but fhe Court bebw has not considered norms of granting or refusing bai! in serious offence, Learned counsel furfher submifs float fhe Cour? bekwi has gramzd bail f0 the non-applican‘rs in Criminal Case No.809/2008 for fhe offence punishable under 526mm 304-3/34 of ‘i'he Indian Penal Code. The non—applicants are relofives of husband of the deceasJi On the ofher‘ hand, learned counsel for the non-uppliconfs opposes The pefifions and submi'rs Thef effer considering fhe meferioi available on record, the Cour? below hos gra.ted boil. Leorned counsel further submits that iriol hos already been commenced, fhereforei There is no proprieiy for recalling the orderi On due consideration of the fact that trial has already been commenced and bail has been granted on 11.11.2008, I do not find any case for . recalling the order or discussing the case on merits which may prejudice. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed. However, the Court below is directed to expedite the trial and decide the case as early as possible. kecords be sent to the trial Court within 2 days A copy of this order be kept in Cr.M.P.No.457./2009. ’ so» T.P. SHARMA Judge