IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 1ST JANUARY 2010 / 11TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 37810 of 2009(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- K.P.BALACHANDRAN, S/O.PARAMU, KUDAYATTUTHARAYIL PANCHATHEERTHA, ELANTHOOR WEST MURI, ELANTHOOR, KOZHENCHERY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. K.SHAJ ADV. SRI.SAJJU.S RESPONDENT: --------------- THE SUPERINTENDENT OF RE-SURVEYS, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. SMT. N. SUDHA DEVI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ............................................................................... W.P.(C) No. 37810 OF 2009 ......................................................................... Dated this the 1st January , 2010 J U D G M E N T The case of the petitioner is that there is callous inaction on the part of the respondent in considering Ext.P7 application for rectifying the mistake in the re-survey records and it is in the said circumstances, that the petitioner is constrained to approach this Court by filing the present Writ Petition. 2. Heard the learned Sr. Government Pleader Smt. N. Sudha Devi, who submits that there is absolutely no mistake on the part of the Revenue/Survey authorities and that the mistake is only on the part of the petitioner himself, who was remitting the tax in respect of the properties in question under a different survey number. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits, that the petitioner will convince the actual position before the respondent, if an opportunity is given with regard to consideration of Ext. P7 application. W.P.(C) No. 37810 OF 2009 2 4. Considering the facts and circumstances, the respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P7 application, if the same is already received and pending consideration by the respondent, of course, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned, as expeditiously as possible , at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk