1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4236/2008. (STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS. DEEN DAYAL & ANOTHER) DATE OF ORDER : 07.07.2008. HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J. Mr. Shyam Sunder Ladrecha for the petitioner. By this petition for writ, a challenge is given to the order dated 11.07.2007 passed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal accepting an appeal preferred by the respondent government servant to challenge the order placing him under compulsory retirement. The Tribunal after examining the entire record, reached at the conclusion that the penalty taken into consideration relates to the remote years, the adverse remarks made in the Annual Confidential Reports for the years 1996-97 are suggestive and the integrity certificates were issued in favour of the petitioner by the competent authorities time to time and as such the compulsory retirement was absolutely unwarranted. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that while examining a case for compulsory retirement, entire service record is required to be examined, but the Tribunal has set aside the order of compulsory retirement by examining recent past conduct of the employee. 2 I am having no doubt that while examining a case for compulsory retirement, the entire service record of an incumbent is required to be taken into consideration, however, the nature of adversities and the conduct of the incumbent in recent past years plays the vital role in reaching at any conclusion. In the instant matter, the Tribunal have examined the entire service record of the employee and gave a specific finding that in recent past years his service was satisfactory and his integrity was beyond doubt. I do not find any error in the order impugned that may warrant interference of this Court under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition for writ, therefore, is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. Anil/