FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1417/2007 (Buldhana Zilla Mastya Vyavasay Sahakari Sangh Maryadit vs. State of Mah. and others) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. Shri P.C.Madkholkar, Adv. for the petitioner Smt.K.H.Joshi, AGP, for respondents. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR AND S.R.DONGAONKAR, JJ DATED : 12 th JUNE, 2008. Heard counsel for the parties. In view of the stand taken by the respondents that the impugned letter dated 24th April, 2006, has already been cancelled by letter dated 31st May, 2006, in our opinion, nothing survives for consideration in the present petition having regard to the limited relief claimed in the petition. Indeed, counsel for the petitioner is right in pointing out that if letter dated 24th April, 2006 is cancelled, the letter issued by the Commissioner of Fisheries dated 27th April, 2006, founded on the impugned letter dated 24th April, 2006, also would not survive. In other words, it will now have to be assumed that the letter dated 24th April 2006 and the consequential letter dated 27th April, 2006 at Annexure-D and Annexure-E respectively are non-est. We, however, make it clear that this opinion does not affect the validity of subsequent letter issued by the State Government dated 31st May, 2006. In case the petitioner is aggrieved by the said letter, he will be free to take recourse to such remedy as may be permissible under the law. This writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. JUDGE JUDGE Rvjalit