r «°" ^•' cy 100/ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR w.p. (s) NO. -^y^1— of 2009 PETETIONER RESPONDENTS ri <^Ky <%^^ Dr. Premish Verma, S/o Shri I.P. Verma, aged about 58 years, R/o A-l, Nehru Complex, T.P. Nagar Chowk, Korba, District-Korba, presently posted as Medical Officer, District- Hospital, Korba (C.6.) VERSUS , :1^ State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare;D:K.5. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director, Directorate, Health Services, Raipur (C.6.) 3. The Chief Medical & Health Officer, District-Korba (C.6.) 4. The Chief Hospital Superintendent, Indira (Sandhi Sover'nment Hospital, District-Korba (C.6.) 5. The State of Madhya Pradesh, through the Secretary Department of Public Health & Family Welfare Mantraldya, Wallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) 6. The Director, Directorate, Health Services, Bhopal (M.P.) WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTEOhLQF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/ORDER AND DIRECTEON '••'''Vf\0 '^€^' ^y ,--4.^..II.. e^ ^y^f/'^ ^^y ^g^^T Gowri HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETJT[QN_(S) N0,5872 OF 2009 PETITIONER Dr. Premish Verma RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others n ^j (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- None for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. Dr. P.R. Kumbhkar, Chief Medical & Health Officer, Korba, is also present. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 6th day ofJanuary, 2011) 1. In the compliance report dated 5-1-2011 it has been clearly mentioned that due payment has already been made to the petitipner vide treasury cheque No.055999/0517002 dated 1-1-2011 for Rs.5,76.550/-. Thus, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that nothing remains to be done in this petition and the petition has become infructuous. 2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to oppose the compliance report or to contest the case otherwise on merits. Thus, having taken the compliance report on record and having-noticed that the entire payment has been made to the petitioner nothing survives in'this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge A