I IGH CGUYET G3: C¥%§‘§&§T?§$5£ H. 53iL$XS§Liz~E H Crimin§§ Mags. Pg?‘s*r§ew Na4€31 at? £308 fv‘mrieiidmgh, Dig’f. Kariy‘a ar‘ {Appiscrtioa undar Semen 482 cf ‘u‘he Codk of Criminai Wacedura, 3973} Pe: rsem Miss 5hurmi§a ingai, counse for The upgaiiccm'rs. Eh i Mr. Neeieneiu Na Roy, Panel Lawyer f e S‘Hri'z/non—a m or Th p imam Nal. : i 5mg§g Eanch Hmible Mt TP. $harma, J.’ ;7 SEAL (REE? (Mssgd cm 4” Egyem’nerl EQOE} 1. This pefh‘icm is for ‘quas‘nmem' mi criminm praczeding pendmg bafore we Cam"? of Jsdiciai Magis'fm’re, Firs? Ciass‘, Manendmgar'h in Crirnimi Case No.42é/ZOO7 againsi‘ Tha applicanfs and {heir mo‘rherg fm‘her é’x bm‘rher, inww’a'ed on ‘S‘he Eas§s of repar‘r bdged' by mmaggiican‘r Na2 m. sisWr—in-iaw of ‘x‘ha applicams. i APPL‘LCANTS: Sm? Shwa‘m M’z‘x‘i‘c" W/o iviwmi, Lgafi txfmm‘ 2;; ‘y‘ga’r‘s; Rm ibiair: Raaéi Q§smmgzun Dis‘w Earguja {6.6%.} 2. Ku. Kmmhbu @mwai. Die Rgjkumar Agrmc‘xé, agaii abéuf E3 yam E. Kn) Fasjq F‘gmwai, D/s Rajkumar iv‘xgmwm, aggzzc? @au‘? '21 yeaw Appiica‘m No.2 & 3 cm 9/6,! fafawaiia 3m§a ‘ m, wnbikagun Thaw 8x ‘i‘ahsi? Amb'ikaggur, DEs‘h‘. Smrguja {06.} Versus RES?ONDENTS: Sfafe cf Chhaff'isgar‘h, Through Poiice Sfafion fv‘mnendmgarh, wsff. Koriya (65.) 2. Sm‘h Priyanka kgrawal, W/o Sum fagmwcxi Thré‘ugh Virmd figr‘awai, ’rzx’a Vii}. 82§baharq T‘ham & Tah 2. The criminai proceeding is chaiieaged on fhe greund fhcd' wifhou‘: tmv wima facie evidence, The case has bean regisfered cgainsf ‘me agnEcanfs and fhese appiica’n‘rs are sisTers-in-iaw of 51m“. Priyanka Agrawa§. non-gapiicanf No.3 and on #312 basis of omnibus & baid si'e‘mmen? and her comwaim, fhe Police has regis‘fer‘ed offence punishabie under Secfions 498-A & 406 mad wifk Secfion 34 0'? fhe IRC. and Sec’rions 3 & 4 of ‘fhe Dowry ?ro%‘libi‘fion ACT agains‘i‘ Them. AppHccm‘r No.1 is a married iady and residing wii‘i’z i’ier husbmd in her mafrimoniai house. 3. I have heard iearned counsei for ‘ihe poriies and perused 'i'he copy of charge shee‘i‘ fiied on behaif of The appiican‘i‘s as aiso ‘H'ae coov of order shee‘is. 4-. This is a pe‘i‘i‘iion fiied under Seci'ion 482 of The Cr.P.C. for ouashina criminai groceeding agains? i‘he appiicam‘s who are sis?ers—in—iew of noo-aoniican‘i' No.2. Inferference iii exercise of inhereni' iur‘isdic‘i‘ion under Seciiom 482 of: fhe Cr—P.C. can be made in rares‘i‘ of rare cases wi'rh a View 1'0 give effec‘i io The order under ‘the Code To preven? abuse of pracess of ‘r‘ne Cour? aed ‘i'o ofi’ierwise secure ‘Hne ems of Jus?ice. Inherem Jorisdicfioo or exfm ordinary jurisdic‘i‘ion under Section 482 of The Cr.P.C. shouid be exercised sparingiy. in rares? of rare cases. 5. In ihe iigh‘i of The aforesaid iegai proposi‘i‘ion and in order To appreciaTe The con?en'i’ions of fi‘ie pari'iesg I have examined ‘i'he documen‘is fiied on behaif of The appiicanis‘ Non-aooiican'i No.2 is sisfer«in—iaw of The appiicanis. She was married on 13-7—2005 with brofher of fhe anpiicani‘s nomeiy, Sunii. She'has iodaed a wri‘ri'en comnioin‘i' and on “(he basis of “the said com‘oiainfi case hos been registered and offer inves‘l'iga‘i‘ion: charge shee‘r has been fiied agains? fhe aooiican‘rs alonq wii‘h mo‘rher, fai‘her a broi’her of fhe oooiicom‘s. If is revaqied fmm The wriWw compiaim‘ Wed by non—appiicanf Na.2 'Fhqf 1331232 ‘Waee agapiican‘rs aiong wifh weir mower, fame? c§ hrofher used ‘fo demand dowry cxn& harass Sm‘t Wiyanku in connec?im wi‘i’h demand 5f dowry w differan‘r dwesg especiaily on 28-3-2007. In case of quashmen? of yroceedingg fhe fria? Cour? i$ raquired To see 'E'haT Veven if The wegmiens made in #he compiqim‘ are Taken To be Wue in ifs face vaiua, Than canvicfion can be made or na‘r, As has been heid by fhe Apex Cour"? in The ma'f'l'er of ‘v'éra ?raka$h Skerma v. Ani§ Kumar Agarwa! and am‘rher {2&97 3 SCC {Crij 370}... where aiiegafions conmmed in compiain‘? ye?i+ion even H: given face vaiue and “taken 1‘0 be correc? in ifs‘ enfire‘fy do no+ disciose an 0*?)ence 'rhen “(he compmih‘r can be quashed. 6. In ‘rhis case, if ‘fhe aizgegmLions are admif‘red by fhe applicam’s same is sufficienf for ‘rheir convic?ion (md ‘r'he proceeding before iiie ’rriei Cour"? is no? abuse of ‘i'he pracess of iaw. 7. I?! View 0f ihe aiaoi/e findings, I d9 mi firid (my gimme for exercising i‘he exir'e ordinary inheren‘i gurisdiciion under Sec‘iion 4S2 of ’rhe Cr.P.C. The pei‘ii‘ian ie devoid of merit same is iiabie f0 be dismissed and if is accord'ingiy, dismissed, in ifmfue. \ Judge 8. Cansequen‘iiy, I.A.No.1/2Q08 sfaads disposed of. we sdi" we? 8mm T. P. Sharmaf f