IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2010 / 14TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 15234 of 2010(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M/S.AGE INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LTD.,V/58, SINICON HOUSE, IDA,KANJIKODE WEST, PALAKKAD, REP.BY GANGADHARAN, ASSISTANT SALES MANAGER. BY ADV. SRI.BIJU BALAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE KERALA MEDICAL SERVICES CORPORATION LTD., NRHM BUILDINGS, GENERAL HOSPITAL JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE PURCHASE MANAGER,KERALA MEDICAL SERVICES CORPORATION LTD, NRHM BUILDINGS, GENERAL HOSPITAL JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 035. 4. M/S.VIJAY LATEX PRODUCTS PVT.LTD., 35,CHANDIVALI VILLAGE, OFF SAKHIVIHAR ROAD, ANDHERI EAST, MUMBAI-400 072. ADV. SRI.V.M.KURIAN FOR R4 ADV.M.AJAY, SC GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI.K.RAMESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 15234 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 4th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the decision taken by the 2nd respondent in the matter of tenders, by which, the 4th respondent' technical bid was accepted, although the 4th respondent is not technically qualified for the same. Now an order has been produced before me issued by the Managing Director of the 2nd respondent, by which, the 4th respondent has been disqualified. In view of the same, both parties agree that this writ petition may be disposed of recoding the same. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge