@ (f’loOL’ i IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR r w.p$No. I i59 /2ooa/ (8.3.) PETITIONER ° K“ /Mohammad Roshan Kuraishi, S/o S.S. Kuraishi, aged about 58 years, R/o Near Station Bilaspur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretaxy , Education Dcpartmont , D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) a Director of public Instruction , Pcnsionbada Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22ggF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT RT! ASPUR w. P. (s) No‘ 1159 of 200/ Pe‘rifioner : Mohammad Roshnn Kuraidni Versus v Respondenw S'rafe of Chhaf-risgarh & ano-fher $iml¢ Bmch: Hon’bk Mr. Jusfice safish K. Agniho'rri. Mr. Kumnresh Tiwari, Advocn'l'e for The pefi'rioner. Sm'r. Anju Ahujn, Depu‘fy Govemmen‘r Advoca're for me Smre/respondems. ORDER (Passed on fhis 28"” Day of February, 2007) Learned counse! appearing for The pefifioner submits fhaf 'l’he pefifioryer is working as Upper Division Teacher. The pefi‘fioner obiained B. Ed. Examinu‘rion oer'fificu're in fhe year 1992, on his own expenses. Learned counsel appearing for 'rhe pefi'rioner submi'rs 1ha1' 1'he quesfion invoived, herein as'ro whether The teacher, who chained B. Ed. Examination Cerfifica're on his own expenses is enfi‘rled +0 Mo advance incremenfs. According +0 learned counsel for 1he pefi‘l’ioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Vashwant Kumar Bharadwai Vs. Municipal Corporation. burg and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. IB.T.I. Examination Certificate on their own 2 @ expenses, are covered by The circular da'red 24.12.98 issued by 111a 5mm Governmenf of Madhya Pradesh. lmrned counsel for 1he pefifioner furfher submits fha'f fine fucfs and question of law involved in fhe presenf case are squarely covered by decision of fhis Court in the case of Voshwont Kumar Bhorodwoj Vs. Mmicipal Corporafion, Dung and arm-nor (Supra), to which learned counsel appearing for 'i'he responden‘rs fairly concedes and agrees wii'h ihe avermem made by iearned counsei appearing‘for fhe pefifioner. Accordingly, the writ pe‘i'ii'ion is allowed in farms of ihe order passed in fhe case of Vashwonf Kumor Bharadwoj Vs. Municipal Corporation. burg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B. Ed.”Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 d: 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. c ‘ i i Sdl- i Satish K. Agnihotri 1 i i Judge i