1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Wednesday,the Twenty Eighth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12996 of 2011 R.SEKAR :PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.10 -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SEMPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. CR NO. 304/2011 :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. G.KARUPPASAMY PANDIAN, Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- The petitioner/Accused No.10 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 147, 341, 324 and 307 IPC and Section 7(1)(a) of Criminal Law Amendment Act, and Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.304 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the alleged occurrence took place on 15.09.2011 and a false case has been registered against them under sections 147, 341, 324 and 307 IPC and Section 7(1)(a) of Criminal Law Amendment Act, and Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.304 of 2011 and hence, they prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that on 15.09.2011 at about 07.30 p.m. near Sempatti area, the petitioner and others broken the glass of Government Bus. He further submits that totally there are eleven accused in this case and they have caused damage worth about Rs.15,000/- and the investigation is going on, and hence he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, the alleged occurrence took place on 15.09.2011. Even though the case has been registered on 15.09.2011 and even though he was not arrested he neither interfered with the investigation nor https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 absconding from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner on condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) to the credit of Crime no.304 of 2011 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No:II, Dindigul, and on receipt on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No:II, Dindigul and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 5.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 28/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO: 1.The Judicial Magistrate No:II, Dindigul. 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Inspector of Police, Sempatti Police Station, Dindigul District. +1. CC to M/S. G.KARUPPASAMY PANDIAN Advocate SR.No.33794. RP/30.09.2011/2P/6C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12996/11 Date :28/09/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/