HaeH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: B{LASPER Wrii Petiticii (Si No. 4507 éf 2008 \ \ Fetitioner Ku. Manmi Yadav D10 Durqa Prasad 20 years, rm”, Madanpur, Tehsi! §ura}pur, Distt. Sarguja. Versus *i) Women State of Chhattisgarh & 9mm Dev’elogment th ough the Dept: Secrc‘arv DAKS Bh-awanl Raipur (CG) Respondeng 2) The Coliectcr, Ambékapur‘ Distt. Sarguia. 3} The PragrammeJPrGSect omcer Women & Chiid DeQempment P'roject, Ranyanuj Nagar‘ Distt‘ Sarguja‘ 4) The Chisf Exgcutive Officer, Janpat Panchayat, Ramanuj Nagar, Distt. Sarguja. 5) Smt. Kashri Bai, W10. Mano} Kumar, Rfc. Madanpur, Tehsii Surajpur, Distt. Sargu}a‘ (Writ Petition under Amcle 226/227 6f the Constitution of india) SB: Han’hie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri S&nt0sh Bharat, ceunsel fer th$ petitioner. Shri {vim Dubey, Pane: Lawyer far the respondents No. ‘i ioBIStaie. Shri A‘s. Kachhawaha, sounsei for the respondent No.5. None for the respondent No.4. r ORAL ORDER (?a§5gd on 1a“ January,2998} i Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he wants‘to withdraw this oetifion with iiberty to take recourse to other aitemaiive statutory remedy that may be avaiiabie to him, in accordance with iaw, to which ieameci counsei appearing for the respondents have no objection 2) Accordingiy, the writ petition ie dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 3) interim order passed eariier shaii stand discharged. _~_..w.~.‘ Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge raju