1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated :29.06.2011 C O R A M The Honourable Mr.Justice K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD) No.5151 of 2011 Thangapandi .. Petitioner Versus 1.The Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai. 2.The Director General of Police (Law and Order), Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Chennai 600 004. 3.The Chairman, The Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai Rural, Madurai District. .. Respondents Prayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned Order passed by the 4th respondent in Na.Ka.No.B1/19000-VR/2010 dated 04.01.2011 and quash the same and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to appoint me for the post of Grade II Police Constable 2010. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senthilkumar For Respondents : Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen Additional Government Pleader O R D E R Challenging the order of the 4th respondent, rejecting the claim of the petitioner dated 04.01.2011 for appointment of the petitioner to the post of Grade II Constable alleging that the petitioner suffers from eye defect, the present writ petition has been filed. 2. In similar circumstances, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents has fairly submitted that the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 petitioner could be sent for Medical Board for eye test. Therefore the doctor once again could find out whether the petitioner is really suffering from eye defect. On doing so, report will be conveyed to the petitioner and the petitioner, if found to be normal, he would be considered to the post of Grade II Constable. In this matter also the learned Additional Government Pleader, consent for such order. 3. In view of the said submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, the fourth respondent is directed to fix the date on which the petitioner could appear before the Medical Board for eye test so as to find out whether his eyes are normal. If it is found that the petitioner suffers from no defect in the eyes, it is needless to say that the fourth respondent has to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Grade II Constable. 4. This writ petition is disposed of with the above terms. Consequently, connected M.P.No.1 of 2011 is closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.Side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai. 2.The Director General of Police (Law and Order), Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Chennai 600 004. 3.The Chairman, The Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai Rural, Madurai District. +1 CC to Special Government Pleader (SR.No.20870) +1 CC to Mr.R.Senthilkumar, Advocate (SR.No.20978) W.P.(MD)No.5151 of 2011 29.06.2011 Vs NSV/5.7.11/2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/