IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 5TH JULY 2007 / 14TH ASHADHA 1929 RP.No. 541 of 2007(J) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.17108/2004 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/ADDL.RESPONDENTS 4 TO 9 ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. M.DEVI, W/O.DECEASED VELAYUDHAN, KOLATHMEETHAL HOUSE, NELLIKODE AMSOM, P.O.NELLIKODE, KOZHIKODE. 2. M.VIJAYALAKSHMI, D/O.DECEASED VELAYUDHAN, KOLATHMEETHAL HOUSE, NELLIKODE AMSOM, P.O.NELLIKODE, KOZHIKODE. 3. M.GOPIDASAN, S/O.DECEASED VELAYUDHAN, KOLATHMEETHAL HOUSE, NELLIKODE AMSOM, P.O.NELLIKODE, KOZHIKODE. 4. M.SATHEESAN, S/O.DECEASED VELAYUDHAN, KOLATHMEETHAL HOUSE, NELLIKODE AMSOM, P.O.NELLIKODE, KOZHIKODE. 5. M.SUDHA, D/O.DECEASED VELAYUDHAN, KOLATHMEETHAL HOUSE, NELLIKODE AMSOM, P.O.NELLIKODE, KOZHIKODE. 6. M.SUDHIKUMAR, S/O.DECEASED VELAYUDHAN, KOLATHMEETHAL HOUSE, NELLIKODE AMSOM, P.O.NELLIKODE, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.R.SUDHISH SMT.M.MANJU RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 ------------------------------------------- 1. N.P.PARI, THACHARAKKAL HOUSE, KOVOOR P.O., MEDICAL COLLEGE, CALICUT - 8. RP 541/07 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY, LOCAL ADMINISTRATION DEPTT., SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 3. CORPORATION OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY. R1 BY ADV.SRI.NIRMAL SAJEENDRAN R3 BY ADV.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN,S.C. FOR KOZHIKODE CORPORATION THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.No.541 of 2007 in W.P.(C) No.17108 of 2004 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 5th July, 2007 ORDER Heard both sides. Mr.R.Sudhissh, learned counsel for the additional respondents in the Writ Petition submits that it was without hearing him that my judgment dated 23.3.2007 was passed. I am unable to accept the above submission. But it is a fact that my attention was not drawn by any of the counsel who were actually present on the day to the interim order dated 25.8.2004 passed in this case. Therefore, I am inclined to review the judgment in view of the interim order dated 25.8.2004 which had not been varied by this court till then. The judgment sought to be reviewed is recalled. Post the Writ Petition before the appropriate Bench. The Review Petition is allowed as above. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE