IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2009 / 13TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 15252 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ 1. THAZLEEM ALI, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.C.K.MOHAMMED, RESIDING AT THAMANNA, CHIRAKKARA P.O., THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. AHAMED RIZA.M., AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.HAMZA, RESIDING AT MANJALINGAL HOUSE, KORANDATTIL LANE, SHORNUR ROAD, THIRUVAMBADY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN - STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No.15252 of 2009 --------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioners were the students of MES College of Engineering, Kuttippuram for B.Tech. The branch of study of the 1st petitioner is Applied Electronics and Engineering and that of the 2nd petitioner is Electronics and Communication Engineering. The college is affiliated to the Calicut University. The petitioners have completed their course. The 1st petitioner had appeared for the 6th Semester Supplementary Examination and the 2nd petitioner had appeared for the 4th and 6th Semester Supplementary Examination held by the University in June, 2008. But, when the result was published, they failed in certain papers. Apparently, dissatisfied with the marks obtained by them, they had applied for revaluation. They are aggrieved that the results of the revaluation has not been published so far. W.P.(C)No.15252 of 2009 :: 2 :: 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the Examination held in June, 2008 . Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to publish the result of the revaluation sought for by the petitioners in relation to 4th and 6th Semester Supplementary Examinations of B.Tech held in June, 2008, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, provided the applications for revaluation are in order and otherwise correct. Sd/- (V.GIRI) Judge sk/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge