1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.17 OF 2009 PETITION NO.17 OF 2009 PETITION NO.17 OF 2009 Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Petitioner Services Ltd. vs. Meenakshi R. Bhansali & 2 ors. Respondents Mrs.Priya Crasto for the petitioner. Mr.R.L.Majgaonkar for the respondents 1 to 3. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED : 7th May, 2009 P.C. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents makes statement that after order dated 16.10.2008, the vehicle has been surrendered directly to the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court has granted prayer (c) on 16.10.2008. In view of this, to avoid further complication and delay in the matter and as the petitioner has got the possession of the vehicle, I am inclined to vacate the order granted by this court on 16.10.2008. 3. The petitioner shall not claim any refund of the amount so already deposited. The Court Receiver is discharged accordingly. 2 4. In view of this, the petition is disposed of accordingly. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.]