IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 20083 of 2009. [O&M] Date of Decision: 10th January, 2011. Dr. Satinder Rattan Petitioner through None Versus State of Punjab & Anr. Respondents through Mr. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. None for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner as well as the respondent Bank, though the case has been called twice. The petitioner approached this Court seeking a restraint order against respondent No. 2 – IDBI Bank not to dispossess him from the property-Flat No. 2, Level-1, Greenland Apartments, Lohgarh, Zirakpur, District SAS Nagar, Mohali in purported compliance of the order dated 01.12.2009 [Annexure P-1] under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. No reply/affidavit has been filed by the Bank despite opportunity. Since learned counsel for the contesting parties are not present, it appears that by now the petitioner might have paid the loan amount as per his undertaking given before this Court on 23.12.2009. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of, however, with liberty to the petitioner that in case he is still left with any grievance against the Bank, he may approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the Act. Disposed of. Dasti. January 10, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE