IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1769 of 2011 Date of decision: November 16, 2011 Smt. Chand Rani and others .. Petitioners Vs. Narinder Mohan alias Narinder Kumar and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate for the respondents. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) This revision petition has arisen out of the order dated 15.2.2011 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Zira, District Ferozepur, declining the application for amendment of the written statement to insert the plea regarding un-registered partition deed dated 21.1.2007, executed between the parties during the pendency of the suit. Though, the partition deed was executed between the parties on 21.1.2007, but it never saw the light of the day till the application for amendment of the written statement was filed in the year 2011. Had there been any compromise between the parties or any partition had come into existence, then the same must have been produced in the court at that time or either of the parties would have informed the court. Any way, without going through the validity of the partition deed, it is settled by now that a document relinquishing or transferring the rights of the property of the value of more than `100/-, the same require registration but the instant document being unregistered is certainly inadmissible in evidence. Even otherwise, the application has been filed when the plaintiff/ petitioner had concluded the evidence and it was fixed for the evidence of the defendant. The application having been filed after five years of the execution of the alleged partition deed and seven years after filing of the suit, appears to be a device just to prolong the case. Dismissed. November 16, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge