§ LQX IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. XZKL /2004 PETITIONER M/s. Mahadeo Transport, Through Managing Partner, Mohd Hasan’ Khan, S/o. An Ahmad Khan, Aged about 48 years, R/o. Bus Stand Road Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS , State of Chhattisgarh, Through; Secretary Department of Transport, D.K.S Bhawan Raipur. State Transport Authority Chhattisgarh at Raipur. State of Jharkhand, Through Secretary, Department of Transport Ranchi. State Transport Authority, ]harkhand Ranchi. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(1 )(2) OE THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIQ K. , 7 Wri‘l’ Pefi‘l'ion No.2762 of 2004 M/s. Mahadeo Transport - Versus - S'ra’re of Chhaf‘risgarh and Three o‘rhers PresenT: — Mr. B.K. Rawa‘r, Advoca‘fe: Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma, Addl. AdvocaTe General: For The STaTe/respondenTs No.1 and 2. None for respondenTs No.3 and 4 in spiTe of service. Mr. B.P. GupTa, AdvocaTe: For The inTervener. For fhe pefifioner. ORDER (Passed on 971w Febndqg‘12005) 1. Perusal of The peTiTion reveals ThaT The same has been filed for direcTing The S‘ra‘re Transport Au‘rhori‘ry, Ranchi, Jharkhand, To coun'rersign on The temporary permifs granfed in favour of The pefifioner on fhe infer-Sfa‘re rou‘i'e from Bilaspur To Ranchi valid up 1’0 313* Ocfober, 2004. . In The firsT insTance, Term of The permiT has already expired, and even otherwise, vide lef‘rer da'red 2.7.2004, The STaTe TransporT AuThoriTy, Ranchi, had already counTersigned on The Temporary permiTs. Therefore, The insTanT wriT peTiTion has become infrucTuous, and The same is dismissed has having become infrucTuous. ‘& . As far as The requesT regarding issuing wriT of mandamus direcTing The STaTes of‘ChhaTTisgarh & J'harkhand To enTer inTo reciprocal agreemenT for creaTion of a rouTe from Bilaspur To Ranchi under SecTion 88 (5) (6) of The MoTor Vehicles AcT, 1988, is concerned, The peTiTioner is a l HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH @ ' Page 2 of2 rou're from Bilaspur To Ranchi. . The wrif pe‘rifion is dismissed No cosfs.