k HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT'BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No.3103 of2004 PETITIONER ‘Netram Vishwakmma S/o Sadhuram Vishwakanna, Aged about 63 years R/o Saddhu {Movm V1dha Sabha Road, Rmpur (C G) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ' ‘ 2. Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works Department, Raipur (C.G.) ‘ 3. Executive Etxgineer, Public Works 1 Department, Division No. 1, Raipur (C.G.) . WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ' SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Ash1sh Shnvastava, Advocate tor the oetmoner S‘m Amy Dwxved1 Deputy Govenment AdVocate f0; the _ State/respondents RESPONDENTS ORAL ORDER {Passed on 28m day of January, 2008) 1. Learned counsel for the yetitioner submits that the facts and question of law ‘ involved in the present writ petition are similar to that of WJ’. No. 4135/2004 [MAJ-Iakim Vs. State ofM.P. (Now CG.) and others}, which has already been disposed of by order dated 28.8.2006. Against the order passed in the said case. one S.L.P was filed in Supreme Court, which was also dismissed. He nnther submits that thereaiter, a review petition was filed, - which was also dismissed. Thus, the case is squarely covered by the said decision. 2. Shri Agay Dwivedi, Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State submits that it is not in dispute that this matter is covered by the decision of M A Hakim’s case (supra) arid this petition can be disposed of in the terms oi the order passed in M A Hakim s case . - For the atoresaid reasons this petition is allowed‘ It is directed that the adrniss1ble pens1on shall be released Within a period of two months from today, as the petitioner has retired long back from service on 31.07.1999, immediately after his regularization. No order asto costs. ‘/ i / ii Sdl- sausii K Asmmm 1/ Judge \ i W i