IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2394 of 1992 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- H K MEHTA Versus M C NAIK -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR SURESH M SHAH for Petitioner No. 1 MR ND GOHIL, AGP, for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI Date of decision: 03/09/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Mr. N.D. Gohil, learned counsel for the respondent states that representative of the respondent no.1 is present in the Court and he makes a statement that the petitioner has already retired from service and therefore the petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to contest this submission. 2. Accordingly the petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. [K.S. JHAVERI, J.] *ar*