IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2009 / 2ND ASHADHA 1931 R.P.No. 542 of 2009(C) ---------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.31108/2007 Dated 28/01/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 ---------------------------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTION CIVIL) NORTH, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, GANDHI ROAD, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH BABU RESPONDENT(S): WRIT PETITIONER & RESPONDENT NO.1 ------------------------------------------------ 1. KURIEN E.KALATHIL, CONTRACTOR, T.C.NO.14/1004, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI. RAMESH CHANDER. R2 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BENNY GERVASIS. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ------------------------------------ R.P. No.542 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated, this the 23rd day of June, 2009 Order Balakrishnan Nair, J. The judgment of the Division Bench in WP(C) No. 31108/07 is sought to be reviewed on the four grounds stated in the memorandum of the Review Petition. Going through those grounds and on hearing Sri.S.Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the review petitioners, we notice that those grounds relate to the alleged error committed by the Division Bench in rendering the judgment. Going by the well settled principles governing review of a judgment, we are of the view that, those alleged errors can be corrected only in appeal and not in a review petition. Therefore, the review petition fails and it is dismissed. Sd/- K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. Sd/- C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE. DK. (True copy)