IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14201 of 2008 JATAHU YADAV & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 5.5.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. In a complaint case cognizance has been taken under various sections of the I.P.C. As per the story a minor boy was kidnapped and forced into matrimony, which is not denied. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this was done with the consent of the parties in question and the complaint came to be filed when certain demands made were not accepted and worked out. What has been stated by the petitioners, it could be a mitigating circumstance but this Court does not get the said feeling from the materials on record at this stage. In view of the same this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Let the Court below, in case they decide to avail regular bail, shall take into consideration all the material and evidence which may be produced by the petitioners, which may help them seek regular bail in the matter, if the case is so made out. This anticipatory bail application is rejected. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)