IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 25849 of 2007 Between: Syed Hassan Ali@ Everest Babu, S/o.Syed Mujafar Hussain, Correspondent Everest School,R/o.Door No.9/84 Banaganapalle (M),Kurnool Dist ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police,Kurnool 2 Sri Gopala Krishna Inspector of Police,Banaganapalle, Kurnool Dist. 3 Sri B.V.Ramana Sub-Inspector of Police,Banganapalle, Kurnool Dist. 4 Smt.Sakeena Begum W/o.Late Syed Ajad, Hussain, R/o.Muttumiah Street, Banganapalle,Kurnool Dist .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for Respondents 1 to 3 : AGP FOR HOME Counsel for Respondent No.4: MR. M.SUBBA REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in interfering in civil dispute pending in O.S.No.78 of 2004 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Banaganapalle, Kurnool District at the behest of respondent No.4. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and Sri M.Subba Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.4. While the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home made her submissions with reference to the counter-affidavit filed by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Banaganapalle Police Station stating that the police are not interfering with the civil disputes, Sri M.Subba Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.4 submitted that the petitioner having filed a civil suit for injunction and failed to obtain an interim order of injunction in the I.A. filed by him, filed the present writ petition as if he is in possession of the property. Since a civil dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.4 is pending, I am not inclined to go into the claim of the parties regarding possession. In view of the counter filed by the Sub- Inspector of Police, Banaganapalle that the police are not interfering with the civil dispute, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.33683 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 24th APRIL, 2008 kvni