THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH C.R.P. NOs. 1524 and 1534 of 2010 DATE: 29.7.2011 BETWEEN: Inturi Venkateswar Reddy and ors petitioners And Kolli Venkata Narsimha reddy and ors Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : P Vijaya Kiran Counsel for the respondents : The Court made the following order: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH C.R.P. Nos. 1524 and 1534 of 2010 COMMON ORDER: Since the parties and issue raised in these two revisions is similar, they are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners herein are plaintiffs. The present two revisions are filed against the order dated 5.3.2010 in dismissing the applications in I.A. No. 1743 of 2009 to implead the third respondent and I.A. No. 1709 of 2009 to amend the plaint. It is stated that during the pendency of suit proceedings, the first respondent/defendant has executed an agreement of sale cum general power of attorney dated 13.3.2009 in favour of proposed third respondent who is wife of second respondent, authorising her to take possession of the property, as such she is necessary party to the suit proceedings and the plaint needs to be amended. The Court below on consideration of the matter has rightly dismissed the said applications on the ground that there is no cause of action in respect of third respondent and impleading her is not just and proper and that the trial is commenced and there is no question of any amendment of plaint. It is also to be noted that the said execution of agreement of sale cum general power of attorney would not in any way affect the claim of plaintiff to pursue the suit proceedings and it is for the plaintiff to prove and establish that he is in possession as on the date of filing of the suit. In such circumstances, this Court does not see any reason to interfere with the order under revision. Accordingly, the revision petitions are dismissed. No costs. ______________ V ESWARAIAH,J DATE: 29.7.2011 TVK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH C.R.P. NOs. 1524 and 1534 of 2010 DATE: 29.7.2011