•i—^n c.:';«aS: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BHASPUR DIVISION BENCH: HON'BLB SHRI T. P. SHARMA & HON'BLB SHRI R.L. JHANWAR, JJ. APPBLLANT APPLICANT P^. IM] H0.44/W07 Hulas Joshi, S/o Shri Arjun Joshi, scged about 28 years (at present 29 years) R/o - ViUage- Baabarad, Thaaa- Nandini aad Up-Tehsil- Ahirwar, Distt-Dui^ (CG) Versus RBSPONDENTS 1. Pawan Joshi, S/o Gokarau Joshi, aged about 60 NON-APPLICANT8 years (at preseat-61 years), R/o - vill^e- Medesara, Thaaa- Naadini aad Up-Tehal- Almwar, Distt. Dui^ (CG) 2. General PubUc Appeal under Section 19 (11 ofthe Family Courts Act, 1984- Present: None for the appeUaat iu two roiinds. SIiri A.K. Prasad, counsel for respondents No.l OR&L - ORDER (Passed on 04.12.2009) Per T. P. Sharnaa. J. Siace there is no representation on behalf of tfae appeUaat in two Touads, we are left with no other option except to dismiss tfae appeal for waat of prosecution. Accordingly, F.A.(M) No. 44/2007 is dismissed for waat of prosecution. —__ Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge R.L. Jhanwar Jtidge Praveen