WPSS No.299/2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala J. Mr. B.N. Molakhi, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. B.D. Kandpal, the learned counsel for the respondent. The cut of mark was 135, whereas, the petitioner has got 134 marks. The petitioner contends that with regard to the question no.40 and 126, answers prepared by the Public Service Commission is incorrect on account of which, the petitioner has not been awarded the marks for these two questions. If the said answers are rectified, the petitioner would come into the eligibility criteria. In this matter, the petitioner has made a representation before the Commission, which is pending consideration. Considering the facts and circumstances that has been brought on record, I dispose of the writ petition directing the commission/respondent to decide the representation by reasoned and speaking order within three weeks from the date of the production of a certified copy of this order. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated:29.4.2010 Nishant