CRIMINAL MISC. M NO.4532 OF 2011 :{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: DECEMBER 22, 2011 Reena Sharma and another .....Petitioners VERSUS Union Territory, Chandigarh and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: None for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. This petition was filed in February 2011 for grant of protection to the petitioners, who have approached this Court apprehending danger to their lives on the ground that they have married against the wishes of their parents. The case was adjourned on request of counsel for the petitioners on 14.2.2011. No one appeared on 9.3.2011, still the case was adjourned. So was the position on 24.3.2011 and 30.3.2011. On 31.3.2011, when none appeared, the case was adjourned sine-die. No one appears for the petitioners even today. CRIMINAL MISC. M NO.4532 OF 2011 :{ 2 }: After having filed this petition, the counsel has not appeared to argue the case. Obviously, the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this petition. In this view of the matter, no case for issuing any direction, granting protection to the petitioners is made out. Dismissed. December 22, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE