IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35740 of 2010 YAMUNA PANDEY @ JAMUNA PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 20.1.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner working as Nazir was transferred but did not make over charge, initially was taken as disobedience of the order finding case under section 188 IPC but later embezzlement of Government money was suspected. Specific submission on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there was no material regarding embezzlement of Government money that is realized by the Sessions Judge also but prayer has been refused finding the same not maintainable with direction to pray for regular bail in the trial court but circumstance prevailing in the case justifying petitioner to continue/remain on bail so granted to him. As such, petitioner is allowed to continue/remain on bail so granted to him in Deo P.S. Case No. 110 of 2009 (Trial No. 2471/10) pending in the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. 2 With the aforesaid observation, this application for anticipatory bail stands disposed of. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)