1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.2729 OF 1984 M/s.Bombay Silk Mills Ltd. and Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. .. Plaintiffs Versus M/s.NITCO Roadways (P) Ltd. .. Defendants None for parties. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 7th January 2009. P.C. . It appears that an Advocate appeared before the Court and had pointed out that plaintiff No.1 has been wound up and Official Liquidator has been appointed. Thereafter, the Advocate for O.L. sought time but neither proceeded to file vakalatnama nor has the O.L. remained present after 1st Septembe 2008. 2. The suit was placed before me on 11th 2 December 2008 and plaintiff No.2 Oriental Insurance Co. is represented by an Advocate, whose name duly appears on board. However, none is present on behalf of plaintiff No.2, Insurance Company either. None was present on 11th December 2008 as well. Therefore, there is no alternative but to dismiss this suit and the same is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)