ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 2607 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 2607 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 2607 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.K.S.Bapat a/w Mr.Jayesh K.Desai i/by M/s. Desai and Desai Associates for the Appellant. Mr.S.L.Ranadhir for Respondent No.1. Mr.N.A.Kolhatkar for Respondent nos.2 and 3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 1st July, 2008 : 1st July, 2008 : 1st July, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . The parties have settled the dispute and accordingly signed the consent terms dated 1st July, 2008 by Appellant, Respondent No.1 and 2 & 3 and advocates for the parties. There is no dispute about the identification as well as signatures. The contents are explained to Respondent No.1 in Hindi. Both the counsel make a statement that the consent terms ( 2 ) are within a frame work of law and record. 2. In view of this, the First Appeal is disposed of in terms of consent terms. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]