1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.08.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.P.S.JANARTHANA RAJA and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN Habeas Corpus Petition(MD)No.662 of 2011 P.Lakshmi .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 2. The Inspector of Police, S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai City. 3. The Inspector of Police, Umatchikulam Police Station, Madurai District. 4. P.Mathialagan 5. M.Shanthi 6. P.Alagiri 7. P.Manimaran 8. P.Tamilarasi 9. P.Muthu .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 to produce the body and person of the detenus A.Deepak, S/o.Asaithambi, aged about 30 years and Nithya, W/o.Deepak, aged about 25 years before this Court and set them at liberty. For petitioner : Mr.A.Abdul Kadhar for M/s.Eddy Emboss For respondents : Mr.C.Ramesh, Addl.Public Prosecutor for R1 to R3 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by P.P.S.JANARTHANA RAJA, J.) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to produce her son by name Deepak, aged about 30 years and her daughter-in-law by name Nithya, aged about 25 years before this Court and set them at liberty. 2.The petitioner is the mother of the detenu-Deepak. It is alleged by the petitioner in the affidavit filed in support of this petition that her son-Deepak is holding Diploma in Electrical and Communication Engineering and he is now working as Manager in Sath Pharma, Madurai. It is also stated that he fell in love with Nithya and they got married against the wish of the petitioner and they have also registered the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 marriage before the Registrar of Marriage/Joint-II Sub Registrar, Dindigul on 06.05.2011. Subsequently, both her son and daughter-in-law were missing. The petitioner also apprehended that the respondents 4 to 9 would have abducted her son and daughter-in-law. Hence, the petitioner made a complaint to the second and third respondent-Police. Since there was no response from the police, in spite of repeated reminders, the petitioner has come forward to file the present HCP. 3.Today, the detenus Deepak and Nithya appeared before this Court. When we enquired, they stated that they have got married and also living separately from the petitioner as well as the respondents 4 to 9. They also stated that they are not under the illegal custody of any one. 4.Both the detenus are majors. Also, it is clear from their submissions that they are not under the illegal custody of any one much less the respondents 4 to 9. Under the circumstances, recording the statements made by the detenus Deepak and Nithya, the Habeas Corpus Petition is closed as nothing further remains to be considered. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 2. The Inspector of Police, S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai City. 3. The Inspector of Police, Umatchikulam Police Station, Madurai District. 4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1CC TO M/S.EDDY & EMBBOSS, ADVOCATE SR.26472 Km SR : 19.08.2011 : 2p/6c HCP(MD)No.662 of 2011 05.08.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/