^ (2T-- 1N THE HIGH OOURI' OF Cl-1HATTISGARH AT BILASPUFt WRITPETltlON(S)NO.^/'2-/20Q^ ^ PETITiQNERS ^^y. JS^"' ^s5^'"':"' ..•••••" • i^i ^ 1. Radheshyam Sahy S/o Shri Kartik Ram Sahu Age about 42 years, AssistantTeacher, Govt.Prin'tarySchoo|,Kyrmandi, Djst{.-Korba(C.G.) 2. Smt.RewatiSingh W/oShriUdaySingh Ageabout47years,Assistant'TfeaGher, Govt. Primary Sohool, Purani Basti, Distt.-Korba (0.0.) ••^^/}^ y\<y)\.*ci' 3. Smt.ShalihiThakur ^ ^ VV/oShriD.S.Thakur Ageab6ut46years,AssiStantTeacher, Govt. PrimarySchool, Purani Basti, Distt.-Korba(C.G.) WSs ^4,MGylshanKumy,, V "'"'"'"" ^C&^ ftq^-y.. ft' W/6 Shri Sure^h Kumar" lCi'lt'i.) fc^ :'ib4 ^N'A ii'a s^'^ l^iTi^ ?01 *117J Ageabout41 years,Assistant'Teache^ Govt. Primary School, Mudapar,Distt.-Korba(e;G.) VERSUS RESPQNDENTS /1. / StateGOver'nmenttifChhattisgarH Through:- Seeretar^ Tribal&EducationDepartment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipyr(C.G.) 2. AssistantCommissioner ? 'TribalWelfare !3eF)artment,Korba(C.©:); 3. DistriGt Edueation Officer ., .•^.KorBa<C.G.):;-. ;"'1--•::,/:^'''^ ^ y4. BlockEducationOfficer Kort)a, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) •^ WRITPETITION UNDERARTICI-EZ^OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioners most humblysubmitasunder:- & HI6H COURTOF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.rSYNo. 81Zof2007 Petitioners Resoondents Versus Radheshyam Sahu ond others State Soyernment of Chhattisgarh ond others -4 SB: Hon'ble Mr. JusticeSatish K. Agnihotri, J Present; Mr. Ajay Shrivostava, Adyocate for the petitioners. Ms. Deepali Pondey, Panel Lawyer for State/respondents. OR DER (Passed on this 12th Daiy of February, 2007) 1. The petitioners were appointed on 27-2-1986, 23-6-1983, 23-6- 1983 and 9-1-1986, respectiyely as Assistarlt Teachers on fixed pay scale of Rs. 300/-. After completion of their probation, they were gnmted reaular pay scale w.e.f. 15-1-1988. 8-7-1985,4-7-1085 and 20-1-1987, respectively. 2. Learned counsel oppearing for •the petitionet's submits that the issue involved in the case \s asto whether, the petitioners are entitled t6 regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial qspointment or after* completion of probation period. 3. The issue invotved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein it wos held that the similarly situated teachers are scale ws.f. the dated of initial appointinent. The matter wos taken- up to the 1-fon'bleSupreme Court. The appeal was dismissed, having regard to the; decision of •the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from date of initial appointment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners further submits that this Court, while considering the same issue in Sushil Tiwari & others Vs. State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh Aothers (W.P. (5) No. 5976 of 2006) byorder dated 7-11-2006, has granted regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial cnpointment. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that Ihis case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in •the case of Sushil Tiwari & others Vs. State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & others (Supra). 6. In view 6f that this petition is allouued in the same tefms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge