IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30182 of 2009 1. NAVEEN KUMAR ISSAR @ NAVEEN ISSAR, SON OF SITA RAM ISSAR 2. SITA RAM ISSAR, SON OF LATE SHIV NARAYAN ISSAR 3. SHAIL DEVI @ SHAIL KUMARI DEVI, WIFE OF SITA RAM ISSAR ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE SAHPUR BHUSWAR, P.S. BIBHUTIPUR, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR. ----- PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. PRAVEENA DEVI, WIFE OF NAVEEN KUMAR ISSAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SHAHPUR BHUSWAR, P.S. BIBHUTIPUR AT PRESENT RESIDING AT DOKHTAR RAJA RAM KAMA, VILLAGE MAKDUMPUR MANDA, P.S. MANSOOR CHAK, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI. ----- OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 4 12.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case under Sections 323, 498(A) and 494 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioner no. 1 had filed a case numbered as C.R. Case No. 912 of 2003 against one Baban Chaudhary and others alleging that Baban Chaudhary had kidnapped his wife. While taking cognizance of the said case, the Court has examined the father of Praveena Devi the complainant who has supported the complaint case and has stated that her daughter was kidnapped by Baban Chaudhary. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present case has been filed at the instance of Baban Chaudhary and it is unbelievable and untrue. Be that as it may, petitioners are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks in connection with C.R. 2 Case No. 528 of 2005 on furnishing bail bonds of rupees ten thousand each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, Samastipur subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)