mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1151 OF 2010 M/s.Pristine Technical Services Petitioner through its proprietor Mr.J.D.Kolhe versus HYT Industrial Corporation and another Respondents Ronak Shah for petitioner. A.S.Deo for respondent no.1. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 15th April 2010 PC : 1. By the impugned order, the application made by the petitioner- plaintiff for permitting production of documents has been rejected. The cross examination of the petitioner-plaintiff was concluded on 19th October 2007 and the application on which the impugned order has been passed has been made on 19th November 2009. Considering the stage at which the application is made and considering the fact that the order impugned is purely of interlocutory nature, no case for interference is made out at this stage. The petitioner can always impugne the order under challenge in this writ petition in an appeal which may be preferred by the petitioner against the decree passed in the suit, if the same be adverse to him. Subject to what is observed above, the writ petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J.)