IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11026 of 2009 ANANDI PRASAD SON OF LATE SHIBNANDAN YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PACHLOBA, POLICE STATION ISLAMPUR, DISTRICT NALANDA ….. PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. BABY DEVI WIFE OF UPENDRA YADAV 3. SABITRI DEVI WIFE OF PRAKASH YADAV 4. AWADHESH YADAV SON OF KAMESHWAR YADAV 5. KAMALA YADAV SON OF KAMESHWAR YADAV 6. NATHUN YADAV SON OF KAMESHWAR YADAV 7. PAPU YADAV SON OF KAMALA YADAV 8. JYOTI DEVI D/O RAJENDRA YADAV 9. UPENDRA YADAV SON OF AWADHESH YADAV 10. UMESH YADAV SON OF KULESHWAR YADAV 11. BIRENDRA YADAV SON OF KULESHWAR YADAV 12. RAKESH YADAV SON OF BUJHABAN YADAV 13. BALI MAHTO SON OF BOUDHU MAHTO, ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PACHLOBA, 14. AMIRAK YADAV SON OF GULAMAN YADAV 15. PRABHANJAN YADAV SON OF AMIRAK YADAV, BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHARHARAPUR, 16. RAJIV YADAV SON OF SURESH YADAV 17. RAVI YADAV SON OF SURESH YADAV, BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAIDI KHURDA, ALL POLICE STATION ISLAMPUR, DISTRICT NALANDA ….. OPP. PARTIES. ----------- 2. 21.09.2010 The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 23.2.2007 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa in Islampur P.S.case No.77 of 2006, by which he has accepted the final report submitted by the opposite party nos.2 to 17 while taking cognizance against others. In my view, the order impugned does not call for any interference and the revisional court has rightly held that Section 319 Cr.P.C. can be availed of by the petitioner at an appropriate stage. The application is dismissed. Narendra/Ashwini ( Anjana Prakash, J. )