IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.640 of 2007 NEERAJ KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 10.9.2008. This application has been preferred against the order dated 30.4.2007 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge XI, Patna in Criminal Revision No. 250 of 2006 thereby the court below has set aside the order passed under section 144 of the Cr.P.C. by I/C S.D.M, Patna City. On perusal of the impugned order it appears that there is no illegality or impropriety in the same. The Additional Session Judge has rightly set aside the order passed by S.D.M. Proceeding was under Section 144 of the Cr.P.C. The life of the proceeding is only 60 days. It appears from the record that the proceeding was initiated on 9.12.2005 whereas the SDM passed final order under Section 144 Cr.P.C. after lapse of 60 days i.e. after expiry of the life the proceeding. Learned SDM had no jurisdiction to pass order after expiry of 60 days. Under the facts and circumstances, - 2 - it is quite apparent that the court below has rightly set aside the order passed under Section 144 Cr.P.C. I find no ground to interfere in the impugned order. Accordingly, this application is rejected. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)