IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2011 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 930 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.165/2010 Dated 05/01/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- E.X.XAVIER, S/O.XAVIER, AGED 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT EDEZHATH HOUSE, NEAR SNDP KUMBALANGI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU SRI.SURAJ KRISHNA B.S. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. K.N.VENUGOPALAN, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.NARAYANAN, SECRETARY KUMBALANGI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KUMBALANGI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. ADDL.R2. K.D.XAVIER, S/O.DEVASI, AGED 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT KATTIKAD, KUMBALANGI (ADDL.R2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN IA NO.453/2010 DT 4/3/2011) ADV. SRI.NOBLE MATHEW FOR ADDL.R2. SRI.JACOB C.K. FOR ADDL.R2. SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN FOR R1 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ Cont.Case (C) NO. 930 OF 2010 ======================= Dated this the 4th day of March, 2011 J U D G M E N T The writ petition was disposed of by judgment dated 5.1.2010 directing consideration of Ext.P1 application made by the petitioner. It is complaining of non compliance of the said direction, the contempt petition is filed. 2. Counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the representation was considered and encroachment on the part of the party respondent in the writ petition was found. It is submitted that further action is being taken on that basis. However, fact remains that, even as on date, decision taken on Ext.P1 has not been communicated to the petitioner. Therefore, Panchayat will communicate its decision on Ext.P1 to the petitioner within two weeks from today and on that basis, the contempt petition will stand closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp