c^\^6^- BERQRE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ('C.G.I Writ Petition (S) No^-t^lO /2007 PETiTIONER ^^ \^^y..-- n ^S\* /V^.'* ^^s^y ^•"^'3^' ^•'^' ^•••' ^ RESPONDENTS 1. 3. Tribhuvan Singh Verma, aged about 44 years, son of Shri Nakul Ram Verma, presentiy working as - Patwari, Patwari Haika No. 7 (Bhedsarj, Tdhsil and Districf - Durg (C.G.) VERSUS Stafe of Chhattisgarh, through the Seeretary, Department of Revenue, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Under Secrefary, Department of Revenue, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner (Land Reeords), State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur. District Cotlector, Distt. Durg JCG) Sub Divisional Officer, Tah and Distt. Durg (C.G.) Pradeep Kumar Singh, aged abouf 25 years, son of Shri Ganga Singh, presently working as - Patwari, Pafwari Halka No. - 19, Tahsil - Bemefara, District - Durg (G.G.) 1§ 1?D 1~0 Im Iz |0 1> 10 |Z lc: |Z 10 [m |?0 1> [?Q 10 lr~ im It/) iro |N3 |0> IQ 1-n |i |m 10|g l^ |0 |Z 10 <^> HIQH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPU! Sjnale Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker Writ Petition (S) No.4910 of PETITIONER Tribhuvan Sinah Verma l " Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisaarh & others. Shri Sandeep Dubey. counsel for the petitioner. Shri Arv'ind Dubey, Panei Lawyer for the State. WR|T PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTIONOESNDIA ORDIEB (06.07.2009) With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finatly Challenae in the instant writ petition is to the order dated '.07-2007 fAnnexure P-1) passed bv the State Government wherebv the petitioner was transferred from P.H. No.-07, tahsil Dura, Distt. Dura to P.H. No. 19, tahsil Bemetara, Distt. Durq in violation of the transfer policv- This Court entertainina the arievance ofthe petitioner had aranted stav in his favour vide order dated 27.8-2007 In view of the fact that this petition was filed on 3.8-2007 and stav was also aranted in favour of the petitioner, the transfer order; so far as it relates to the petitioner is hereby quashed "However, the State Government wou!d be at libertv to pass an order ifthe administrative exigency so warrant. With the above observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- ~ Pritinker Diwakar Judge