:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.5422 OF 2008 NO.5422 OF 2008 NO.5422 OF 2008 Union of India & Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Smt.Vasanti Eknath Kolekar ..Respondent WITH WITH WITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.5448 OF 2008 NO.5448 OF 2008 NO.5448 OF 2008 Union of India & Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Shri.Gajanan Jayram Gothoskar ..Respondent WITH WITH WITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.6025 OF 2008 NO.6025 OF 2008 NO.6025 OF 2008 Union of India & Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Ashok Shamrao Parasnis ..Respondent Mr.V.S.Masurkar i/b.Mrs.Neeta V.Masurkar for petitioners. Mr.S.P.Saxena for respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & :- V.C.DAGA & :- V.C.DAGA & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA V.MOHTA V.MOHTA,JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 13TH APRIL,2009 : 13TH APRIL,2009 : 13TH APRIL,2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard. . Perused petition. 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. 2. Petition involving identical question has already been disposed by this Court vide order dated :2: 1st July, 2008 in Writ Petition No.2373 of 2006 relying upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Union Union Union of India & Ors. Vs. Jagdish Narayanrao Khisti of India & Ors. Vs. Jagdish Narayanrao Khisti of India & Ors. Vs. Jagdish Narayanrao Khisti decided decided decided on 25th June, 2004 in Writ Petition No.2535 of on 25th June, 2004 in Writ Petition No.2535 of on 25th June, 2004 in Writ Petition No.2535 of 2003 2003 2003 (unreported) (unreported) (unreported). 2. In the case of Union of India & Ors. Vs. Jagdish Khisti (cited supra), the Division Bench of this Court has relied upon the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Union of India Vs. G.Vasudevan Union of India Vs. G.Vasudevan Union of India Vs. G.Vasudevan Pillay Pillay Pillay & Ors. 1995(1) SCC 396. & Ors. 1995(1) SCC 396. & Ors. 1995(1) SCC 396. 3. Both these judgments i.e. judgment in Writ Petition No.2373 of 2006 and Writ Petition No.2535 of 2003 are based on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of G.Vasudevan Pillay (cited supra). In this view of the matter, all the above three petitions stand disposed of for the reasons recorded in the aforesaid judgment of the Apex Court. No order as to costs. 4. Petitioners are directed to implement the impugned order within two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)