IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5570 of 2009 RAVINDRA NATH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5571 of 2009 BHARATJI SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5576 of 2009 UDAY NARAYAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5578 of 2009 BRIJMOHAN DUBEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5590 of 2009 GOPALJI YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5591 of 2009 SURENDRA RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5592 of 2009 DHIRENDRA PRATAP SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5595 of 2009 VASHISTHA NARAYAN MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5596 of 2009 SATYENDRA PRAKASH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5597 of 2009 RAJ NARAYAN MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5598 of 2009 2 NAGENDRA RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5599 of 2009 HARISCHANDRA MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5600 of 2009 SRI NIWAS SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5603 of 2009 LALAN RAM ARYA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5604 of 2009 SUBASH RAM @ SUBHASH RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5605 of 2009 GARJAN PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- CWJC No.5606 of 2009 LAL PRASAD GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 1.05.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the State. The issue of appointment of the petitioners, as Assistant Teacher on the I.SC. trained scale as far back as 1986 and revision of the pay scale when the same has subsequently been modified as late as 2008 have all been considered by this Court in its order dated 30.4.2009 in CWJC No. 5541 of 2009. Considering the order of this Court in CWJC No. 8333 of 1999 disposed on 29.7.2004 also appended at Annexure 5 3 presently this Court has directed the respondents to examine the claim of the petitioner in light thereof. If they be satisfied that the petitioner is similarly situated they shall be required to accord similar treatment to him. In the event that they are satisfied that the petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of the same they shall be obliged to pass a reasoned and speaking order on the issue of difference so that judicial review of their order, if occasion arise, shall be possible for this Court. These writ applications are disposed in the same terms. Let such consideration be done in like manner within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)