IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8247 of 2011 Arvind Kumar, son of Sri Tapeshwer Mahto, resident of village- Patepur Gopinath, P.S. Pusa, Distt. Samastipur. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 6. 16.08.2011 Counter affidavit on behalf of the O.P. no.2 has been filed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, O.P. No.2 and for the State. Petitioner is named accused in this case with allegation of taking some money from the complainant side for some purpose but initially avoided to return, ultimately he issued a cheque of Rs. 44, 000/- which was bounced due to insufficient fund. Submission is that some money has been paid back to the complainant side on earlier occasion and in fact, there is dispute as regards to transfer of motor cycle which is as per petitioner in possession of the prosecution side which is denied by O.P. No.2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on depositing of Rs. 44, 000/- in the court below, subject to the decision of the case, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri D. Mishra 1st Class J.M., samastipur, in Complaint Case 2 No.810 of 2005, Tr. No. 459 of 2011 subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal procedure with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for one year or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dated, without giving any reasonable explanation or even on single default in payment, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Ravi/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)