IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13421 of 2011 DABLU BIND @ BINOD BIND Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 13.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is neither named in the FIR nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. It appears from perusal of the impugned order as well as from submissions of the parties that the petitioner was arrested in a case registered under various provisions of the Arms Act and made his confessional statement disclosing his involvement in the present case. Except the above-said material, there is nothing against the petitioner. So far as criminal antecedent of the petitioner is concerned, it has specifically been mentioned on behalf of the petitioner at paragraph-14 of this application that only two cases had been instituted against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Dablu Bind @ Binod Bind be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with (G.R.P. Jamalpur) Rail Jamalpur P.S. Case No. 29 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)