1 cp172.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 172 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7749 OF 2008 [Mohan Laxman Tupe vs. State of Mah. & Ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. M.S. Choudhari, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. D.R. Kale, AGP for State. Mr. U.B. Bondar, Advocate for Resp. No. 2. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 14TH JULY, 2011 PER COURT : Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the respondents. 2. This contempt petition alleges disobedience of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court on 22-07-2010 in W.P. No. 7749 of 2008. Para-7 of the order of the Division Bench reads thus : 2 cp172.11 "7. In the light of the facts and circumstances, we direct the Authority concerned to consider appointing the petitioner in case there is vacancy. The petitioner is entitled to the benefit as provided under the Notification dated 19th August 2005." 3. Learned Counsel appearing for respondent No.2 on written instructions from his client makes a statement that on 11-07-2011 appointment order is issued in the name of the petitioner. He submits that as soon as vacancy arose, the appointment letter will be issued in the name of the petitioner. 4. In the light of the statement of the Counsel for respondent No.2, contempt petition is disposed of. Notice stands discharged. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/JUL11