IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY THIS THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO.2099 OF 1991 Between: Sadari Siddappa (Died) Sadari Gowramma and five others. - - - Appellants/ Plaintiffs. AND Sadari Narayanappa and two others. - - - Respondents/ Defendants. The Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO A.S.M.P. NO.2136 OF 2010 AND APPEAL SUIT NO.2099 OF 1991 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants and the learned counsel appearing for the Respondents. The appellants 2 to 7 and the first respondent are present. They have already filed a memorandum of compromise in A.S.M.P. 2136 of 2010. The terms of the compromise were read over and explained to them in Telugu and they agreed for the terms of the compromise mentioned in A.S.M.P. No.2136 of 2010, which are as follows : a) The appellants 3 to 5 are allotted ‘A’ Schedule property more fully described in the schedule annexed to this deed. b) The first respondent/first defendant i.e. Sadari Naraynappa is allotted ‘B’ Schedule property. c) The appellants herein admit the right and title of ‘B’ schedule property in favour of the first respondent i.e., Sadari Narayanappa. d) The first respondent herein admits the right and title of the ‘A’ schedule, property in favour of the appellants 3 to 5. e) Both the parties have agreed not to dispute in future the title and possession of the properties allotted to the parties under this compromise. f) The first respondent i.e., S. Narayanappa is entitled for the amount of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees two thousand) with interest accrued which was deposited in the Court of Additional District Judge, Hindupur, and to this effect the appellants 2 to 7 shall sign necessary papers and also endorse no objection certificate on the petition to be filed by the first respondent. g) Both the parties acknowledge the right and title of the third respondent and his legal representation to an extent of 0.30 cents of land situated in Sy. No.509-3 of Sree Rangarajupalli with specific boundaries. h) Appellants 3 to 5 have agreed to maintain the second appellant their mother Smt. S. Gowramma during her lifetime in lieu of her not claiming any share in ‘A’ schedule property. Therefore, the above terms of compromise are recorded and in view of the same, A.S.M.P. 2136 of 2010 is allowed by decreeing O.S. No.104 of 1935, pending on the file of Additional District Judge, Hindupur, Anantapur District, in terms of compromise and consequently, this Appeal is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ R. KANTHA RAO, J. October, 29, 2010. DSH