w^^simm^ysi COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BiLASPUR : HON'BLE MR. S.R.NAYAK, C.J. AND HQN'BLE VR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRi. J. WRIT PETITJON N0.1547 OF 20Q1 Petjtioners M/s Swastik Wires a partnership firm duly registered under the relevant provisions of the Partnership Act, 1932 haying its prindpa! piace of business at Bhanpuri industrial Area, Ralpur C.G. A.L.Agrawal son of Shri B.LAgrawal, Adult, partner M/s Swastik Wires, resident of Near Kankall Taiab, Raipur C.G. versus Res&ond.ents 4. The State of Chhattisgarh through the Coliector, Raipur The inspector General of Registration and Superintendent of Stamps, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, presently working at Gwallor The District Reglstrar and Coilector of Stamps, Raipur Bank of Baroda, a body corporate having comrsion sea! and perpetual succession having inter alia amongst other branches a branch at K.K.Road, Raipur C.G. WRIT_PETJT!ON N0.1990 OF 2003 Petitioner M./s Kripai Springs (india) Ltd., a company duiy incorporated under the relevant provision provisjons of the Companies Act, 195S having its principies piace of business at Main ssa.-tinwHaasss versys Resoondents Road, Bargarh 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Coliector, Raipur 2. The inspector Generai of Registration and Superintendent of Stamps, Govt. of Chhattlsgarh, presentiy working at Gwailor 3. The District Registrar and Collector of Stamps, Raipur 4. Andhra Bank, a body corporate having common seal and perpetua! succession having inter alia amongst other branches at Govt. Hospita! Road, Bargarh Present : Mr. B.P.Sharma, counsel for the petltioners in both the petitions. Mr. Utkarsh Verma, Deputy Government Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3 in both the petltlons. iVlr. Yashwant TKvari with Mr. Amlyakant Tlwari, counssi for respondent No.4 in Writ Petition No.1547 of 2001. Non9 appears for respondent No.4 in Writ Petition No.1990 of2003. (Passed on 19 of Ssptember, 2006) S.R.Nayak, CJ.: The foilowing order of ths Court was passed by Learned counsei appearing for ali the partles wouid submit that the polnt that arises for declsion In these petitions Is squarely covered by the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court dated 11-3-2005 passed In Writ Petitlon No.1450 of 1996 (M/s Ramesh RoSfing Mslis Privaie Limsted and others vs. The Stste of Madhya Pradesh and others). 2. in vi©wof the above joint submission, these writ petitions are dlsposed of In terms of the above judgment and for the same reasons set out by this Court in that judgment. No costs. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gopal