1 lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.768 OF 2002 Shri Parag Ramchandra Marku : Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra and ors. : Respondents. Mr. R K Mendadkar for the Petitioner. Mr. A I Patel, AGP, for the Respondent/State. CORAM : P B MAJMUDAR & R M SAVANT, JJ. DATE : 09th June 2010 P.C. 1 The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that since the Petitioner has completed course in May 2008 and obtained degree of B.E. (Information Technology), he desires to withdraw this Petition as not pressed. The Petition is disposed of as not pressed. Rule discharged. 2 The learned counsel for the Petitioner further states that the Petitioner will not claim any benefit in future on the ground that she belongs to Malhar Koli, Scheduled Tribe. It is therefore clarified that the Petitioner shall not claim any future benefits on the basis that he belongs to Malhar Koli, Scheduled Tribe. He would therefore be treated as non- scheduled tribe for any future appointments/employment etc. [R.M.SAVANT, J] [P.B.MAJMUDAR, J]