IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45152 of 2009 1. Pintu Kumar Sharma @ Pintu Sharma, Son of Shyam Bahadur Sharma. 2. Basant Kumar Sharma, Son of Satyendra Sharma @ Bachhan Sharma. 3. Rupesh Kumar Sharma @ Chandu Sharma,S/O Kameshwar Sharma. All residents of Village-Biram Pursa, P.O.Rivilganj, District-Saran, Chapra…………………Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Mithilesh Kumar Sharma, Son of Late Ram Kirpal Sharma, resident of Village- Biram Parsa, P.O. Rivilganj, District-Saran, Chapra………………..………….Opposite Parties. ----------- For the petitioners: Mr. Ravi Bhushan Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. B. P. Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 2. 15.03.2011. The petitioners have prayed for quashing the order of cognizance dated 23.01.2009 whereby the cognizance has been taken under Section 366(A)/34 of the I.P.C. on protest petition. It is very fairly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners though the trial has started but in 164 Cr. P.C. statement the victim girl stated that she married with petitioner no.3 of her own and she in 164 Cr. P.C. Statement got her age recorded as 24 years. The doctor has also found the victim to be major. Let the learned trial court during trial first examine the victim as a witness and conclude the trial in accordance with 2 law expeditiously. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)