HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 159 of 2007 Petitioner Versus Respondents 1. Sohar Ram, S/o Dugul Ram, aged 35 years, R/o Village Nawadihkala, Tahsil Kusmi, District Sarguja (Chhattisgarh) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretalv to the DepaJ‘tment of Panchayat and Samaj Sewa, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) . Sub- Divisional O$cer (Revenue) Kusmi, Tahsil Kusmj, District Saxguja (Chhattisgarh). Returning Omcer, Panchayat Election, Janpad Panchayat Kusmi, Distxict Sarguja (Chhattisgarh) . Santosh, Slo Bhukha Oroan, aged 35 years, Oroan by Caste. Anup Lal, S/o Basdeo, aged 25 yeais. Nawal Sai, S/ o Godhwa, aged 25 yeals. Nawel, S/ o Muneshwar Oroan, aged 23 years, Oman by Caste. Mangal Deo, S/o Sastu, aged 35 yeaIS, Oroan by Caste. Ramesh, S/o Sahiya Oman, aged about 3O yeaxs, Oroan by Caste. Shital, S/o Nanka, aged 27 yea1s, Kawar by Caste. Sukhram, S/o Dharma, aged 46 yeals, Oroan by Caste. (All No. 4 to 11 axe R/o Village Nawadihkala, Tahsil Kusmi, District Sarguja (Chhattisgarh) O’IO1\\ A 00 10. 11. WRIT PETITXON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF‘ INDIA (SB: Hon’ble Shn' Satish K. Agnihotn' J.) None for the petitioner. Shri Vivek Shanna, Panel Lawyer for the respondents No. 1 and 2. Shri Arun Shukla, Advocate for the respondent No. 4. r~L/ ORDERhmn ( Passed on this 13th day of July, 2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both the occasions none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in prosecuting the matter. In View of the foregoing, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. / ‘ s Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri f Judge l r