IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CIVILREVISION N0.1^^ OF 2005 gQ?j|& ..'} ^^I.I'^./LtLi APPLICANT ^ ''%. ^ /Chandan Singh Son of Shri Ashok Singh, aged about 27 years, Resident of Qr. No. 274, Bhatgaon, Post Bhatgaon, Out Post Bhatgaon, Tahsil Pratappur, District Surguja (C.G.), (UNSOUND MIND). Through: his natural guardian '^t^'y^ father shri Ashok sin9h son of shri Ranjit Singh, aged about 50 years, Resident of Qr. No. 274, Bhatgaon, Post Bhatgaon, Out Post Bhatgaon, Tahsil Pratappur, District Surguja (C.G.). ^J^ ^y .-•'^ l^ VERSUS NON-APPLICANT : ^-NONE CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE,1908 XI-HC-22 •3'ST "!il^!ci<<, '®^ft?"TS,feiRT^!: :___....C.£^^^j^ W<T?ff fhWfi sn^T^aiwBfei 19.12.200S ShriSushttDubey, teimsd Heard. The applicant has preferred 24.09.2005 passed by iMmed Thir< Trtbunaf (F.T.C.) Ambikapurand^fcy to release Vhe amount which has account of the claimant has been rqe^ The instant application is at through his natural guardian. Learnep that in all Rs. 3,05,000/- was awarde< 1,50,000/- has been disbureed tp the| have been deposited in the fixed d< applicant filed an appticaUon betore| deposited is required by the consktering tfte above reasons rejectc the appticant has already been paj treatment and there is no evidence a< the amount soughtto be withdrawn hsjs treatment. Heartl tearned counsel for order, 1 do not findany illegatity in thi by this Court and accordjngly the revis In viewofthe above, I.A. No. cottisel for the applteant. lliis bleen the «fcl';fl<-l''ll-)TIItRff'? fetZt TfWSH 4; sfpgti an^i rsvislen agalnst ttie order date Additionat Motor Accidenl Clahns ^hkrfilhe appllcaUpn of the applicant deposited in the fixed deposit bted. instance af tlw applieant acting counsal for the applicant submits to the cfeumant. Hewever, orily Rs. 1elatmant and the remahung amount tposit account of ttie ctajmant. The the trial Court as the amount so but ttie frial Cburt w'rthout ^dthe applicafion OT the ground that i|d cashofRs. 1,50,00®-towards jduced by ttie appflcant to sh<w that been spent by the applieart for his th|B appteanl, perused the impugned it> order which requeires hrterference pon is rsjected. 3?1W2005slandsdisposedof. _ appfteant <^ Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge [^ ^Pa^