JL ^s SINGLE BEMCH IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G) W.P. (Sl N0. OF 2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS .0. ^^•-^ ^e^ ^y^.--^' ^---'" ^' Lavkumar Pandey, aged about 48 years, S/o Shri Makhanlal Pandey, Shiksha Karmi Varg-111, Janpad Primary School Bharvidih Block Bilha, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS ^' :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, General Administration Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Panchayat & Social welfare Department , Mantralaya, Raipur(C.G.) f 3. The Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA •^fr-fJ^~' 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As mentioned in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As mentioned in the cause title. / HIOH COURT OB- CHHArTESQARH AT BILASPUR Petitioaer r.P.jSt.NO. -7221/2011 Lav Kumar Pandev versus State of Chhattisgarh SE Others Shri K.S.Pawar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, P.L. for the State. {02.12.2011) Grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that initially he was appointed on contract basis for the census work and thereafter circular was issued by the State Govemment for issuing regular appointment to such persons in the Govemment posts. According to the petitioner, number of similarly placed persons have been appointed as LDC/Assistant Grade-III whereas the petitioner has been appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III which is not a regular govemment post. He further submits that some of the persons who were initially appointed as Shiksha Karmi, later on they too were appointed on regular posts of LDC/Assistant Grade-III or equivalent to the said post but the case of the petitioner has not been considered. He submits that at this stage, purpose of filing this petition would be served if direction is issued to the respondent No.3 to decide (he pending representation (Annexure P/6) of the petitioner. State counsel submits that let the petitioner make a fresh detailed representation to the respondent No.3 and in tum the same would be decided in accordance with law. The present petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to tile fresh representation within two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and in tum it is expected from the respondent N0,3 to decide the same as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law, It is made clear that fhis court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concemed would be at Siberty to decide the representation strictiy in accordance with law. ____^——-— Sdl- pritinl^riwakar Judge I"