mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6050 OF 2009 Murtuza Fakruddin Rampurwala Petitioner versus Krishnarjun Mukund Nagulpelli and others Respondents S.M.Railkar for petitioner. Madhav Jamdar for respondent no.1. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 21st July 2009 PC :- 1. Learned counsel for the parties agree that in view of the fact that the impugned order will be a decree under sub section 2 of section 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the remedy of preferring an appeal will be available to the petitioner for challenging the impugned order. Hence, the writ petition is not entertained with a liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings. The impugned order shall not be executed for a period of four weeks from today subject to condition that the petitioner will not create any third party interests and will not part with possession of the premises in question. It is made clear that a limited relief is granted to enable the petitioner to adopt appropriate remedy. The application for interim relief, if any, made by the petitioner will be decided by the concerned Court on its own merits without being influenced by grant of limited protection by this Court. (A.S.OKA, J.)