1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION) THURSDAY, THE 13th DAY OF OCTOBER 2011 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA A. No.3637 of 2011 in C.S. No.422 of 2011 S.Vijayakumar, No.1181 D Anna Nagar West End Colony, Mogappair, Chennai-600 050. ... Plaintiff -Versus- A.Krishnan, Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, South Usman Road, West CIT Nagar, Chennai-600 035. ... Defendant A. No.3637 of 2011:- P.Ganesan, Plot No.2, Devi Nagar, Rajeswari Street, Chennai-600 109. ... Proposed Party/Applicant -Versus- 1. S.Vijayakumar, No.1181 D Anna Nagar West End Colony, Mogappair, Chennai-600 050. ... Respondent/Plaintiff 2. A.Krishnan, Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, South Usman Road, West CIT Nagar, Chennai-600 035.... Respondent/Defendant Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the petitioner herein to implead as 2nd defendant in the above suit. This Application coming on this day before this Court for hearing the court made the following order: This application under Order 1 Rule 10 (2) of the Code of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Civil Procedure has been moved by P.Ganesan to be impleaded as party in the suit filed by S.Vijayakumar, praying for the relief of injunction against the defendant in the suit. 2.In support of the application, it is pleaded that All India Indian Overseas Bank Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribes Welfare Association, bearing registration No.163 suffered cancellation of registration and thereafter, a new association namely Indian Overseas Bank Award Staff & Officers SC & ST Welfare Association has been formed. 3.The applicant, therefore, prays to be impleaded in the suit to challenge the maintainability of the suit, on behalf of the association, whose registration is cancelled. The suit is not on behalf of association, nor there is any relief claimed against the applicant or the new association of which applicant is member. 4.It is also pleaded case that this Court on 29.06.2011 in A.No.2922 of 2011 had passed an order as under: "...it is open to anyone to file application before this Court, either supporting applicant's stand that he is representing the Association or otherwise." 5.This application, on the face of it, is misconceived. The application under Order 1 Rule 8 of the CPC has not attained finality nor the suit filed under Order 1 Rule 8 of the CPC. 6.The suit filed by the 1st respondent / plaintiff is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3 merely a suit for injunction against the 2nd respondent / defendant. The plaintiff, therefore, has no locus standi or interest in the application. 7.The applicant, therefore, is neither proper nor necessary party. 8.Consequently, this application, being totally misconceived, is ordered to be dismissed. Sd/-V.K.S.J 13.10.2011 //Certified to be a true copy// Dated this the day of 2011. R.s/02.11.2011 COURT OFFICER From 25.09.2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Order/Judgment Decree in this format. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/