1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2151 OF 2010 1 Shri Pratap Vishwanath Patil ) 2 Shri Niwas Bapusaheb Parabkar )..Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra )..Respondent ­­­­ Mr. P. D. Dalvi for the applicants. Smt.A. A. Mane APP for the State. ­­­­ Coram : R.S.MOHITE,J Date : 5th May, 2010 PC 1 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail. The applicants are shown as accused nos.18 & 20 in C.R.No.25 of 2010 registered by the Murgud Police station for alleged offences under sections 395, 427 & 504 of IPC. On perusing the statement of the complainant Seema Patil, it is seen that the complaint does not name the present applicants. It mentions that there was a mob of 50 to 60 persons. In so far as offence under Section 395 is concerned, one Sharad Patil has said to have taken his mangalsutra and one Baccharam Patil has taken Rs.5000/­. The mob has gathered because husband of the applicant has breached the condition of bail. This aspect is confirmed by the APP. In these circumstances, in my view, further investigation can be proceeded without custodial interrogation of the applicants. It is therefore, directed that in the event of their arrest, the applicants may be released on bail in the sum of Rs.10,000/­ each with one surety each in 2 the like amount subject to the condition that they will report to the Investigating officer once a week till the charge­sheet is filed and do not tamper with the prosecution witnesses and remain present on all dates of their trial unless exempted. Application stands disposed off. (R.S.MOHITE,J) 3