IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22312 of 2010 1. ABHAI KUMAR RAI @ ABHAI KUMAR S/O LATE ARVIND KUMAR RAI. 2. CHINTA DEVI WIFE OF ABHAI KUMAR RAI ALIAS ABHAI KUMAR. BOTH R/O VILLAGE-ORAINA, P.S. MUFFASIL, DISTRICT-NAWADA. --PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY With Cr.Misc. No.19706 of 2010 1. LALAN KUMAR S/O ABHAY KUMAR @ ABAI KUMAR RAI 2. SIMPI DEVI @ SIMPI KUMARI, BOTH R/O VILLAGE-ORAINA, P.S. MUFFASIL, DISTRICT-NAWADAH. --PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 6 16.11.2010 Learned counsel is permitted to make correction in the name of father of petitioner no.1 of Cr.Misc. no. 22312 of 2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Sri Nand Kishore Singh, learned counsel for the informant. Since both these applications arise out of one common case, they are being disposed of by this common 2 order. Petitioners are named accused in this case being parents-in-law and brother and sister-in-law of the deceased sister of the informant whose dead body was found over railway track. Initially one unnatural death case was instituted wherein immediately father of the deceased arrived and prayed for release of the body in his favour which was done after autopsy. In the instant case, three autopsy was conducted of the dead body which was found at substantial distance from the house of the petitioners where she was undisputedly residing before found dead. By way of Annexure-4 there appears an application written by husband of the deceased addressed to the Superintendent of Police stating that at about 3.00 A.M., roughly three hours before dead body was found, she, without intimating any one, left the house. She was a mental patient but there is nothing in the investigation to support such ailment. At the same time except that there was a demand of dowry by in-laws of the deceased, that is, petitioners. There is nothing specific against them. The husband, undisputedly, after some detention in custody, has been granted the privilege of bail. 3 Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawadah, in Muffasil P.S. Case no. 27 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioners shall remain present before the court below on each and every date till commencement of the trial. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad