IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.1032 OF 2000 Smt.Indumati Sakharam Kamerkar & ors.. Applicants versus Smt.Maltibai Vinayak Kamerkar & ors..Respondents ... None for the applicants. None for the respondents. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 18th August 2006. DATED : 18th August 2006. DATED : 18th August 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. None present for the revision applicants. The learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner is appointed as Hon’ble Judge of this Court. Notices were directed to be issued to the petitioners. As per the office report notice of petitioner nos.1 2 and 3 are served. They have not taken any steps for appointment of any other advocate nor are they present personally when called. Notice of petitioner no.4 is returned unserved with the remark "locked". Hence nothing further can be done in respect of petitioner no.4 2. As the petitioners are absent, though served, civil revision application is dismissed for non prosecution. (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J)