CRM-M No. 4926 of 2011 **** Kunwar Onkar Singh vs. State of Punjab and another Present: Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Dr. U. S. Dhaliwal, Addl. AG, Punjab. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the complainant-respondent No.2. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in complaint case titled Sham Sunder versus Kunwar Onkar Singh and another, under Sections 420, 467 and 471 IPC pending in the Court of CJM, Hoshiarpur bearing Complaint Case No. 15 dated 16.03.2004. It is not disputed that the petitioner had deposited a sum of ` 25,000/- in terms of the order dated 16.02.2011. Learned counsel for the complainant has, however, urged that since the petitioner had been declared a proclaimed offender, he should not be granted the benefit of anticipatory bail. I, however, find that interim bail was granted to the petitioner and , as mentioned above, he has fulfilled the conditions imposed by this Court. In the circumstances order dated 16.02.2011 is made absolute subject to the conditions envisaged in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C., up to the filing of the challan, whereafter the petitioner would be required to seek regular bail. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE March 18, 2011 sunita