IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2991 of 2006 MOHAN PRASAD VERMA Versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, MUMBAI (BOMBAY) ----------- 3 10.05.2010 Mr. Md. Ataul Haque, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. A.K. Sinha, learned counsel for the Bank are present. Learned counsel for the Bank submits that despite writing letters to the authorities of the Bank he has not received any instructions. The petitioner was removed from the services of the Bank consequent upon conviction in a criminal case and which sentence was confirmed by the High Court in appeal. The writ petition was filed for payment of the admissible dues of the petitioner, to which he was found entitled by the Bank. Learned counsel for the Bank in absence of relevant instructions on the issue submits that the matter can be disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.3, the Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, Gaya and who shall examine the admissible claim of the petitioner and make payment thereof. Learned counsel for the petitioner 2 with reference to the employees provident fund statement placed at Annexure-1 submits that at least the said amount should be paid to the petitioner. Having regard to the circumstances aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, Gaya to consider and dispose of the claim of the petitioner by making payment of the admissible dues together with admissible interest thereon within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Such of the claims of the petitioner as not found admissible by the Regional Manager, may be disposed of by speaking order to be passed within the same period. The writ petition is disposed of with the direction aforesaid. Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)