IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.23 OF 2004 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.276 OF 2002 Lilaram Ladharam Lalwani ...Applicant Versus Kishinchand Lilaram Lalwani & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.V.V.Pai for Applicant. Ms.Nililma S.Bhadange for Respondent No.1. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 21, 2006. MARCH 21, 2006. MARCH 21, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Explanation offered in the Application is unacceptable. However, as the litigant should not suffer for the mistake of the Advocate, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), on condition that the Advocate on record for the Applicant, shall personally pay cost quantified at Rs.750/- (Rupees Seven Hundred Fifty) to the High Court Legal Services Committee within one week from : 2 : today. 2. Main matter to appear as per its turn under appropriate caption. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.