IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2282 of 2009 SHAMBHU PASWAN S/O KISHORI PASWAN, R/O VILLAGE- MADHURA, P.S. FULKAHA (NARPATGANJ) DISTRICT- ARARIA Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.50199 of 2008 KUSHARIA PASWAN @ KUSHAR PASWAN S/O BANKU PASWAN @ BAIGANU PASWAN R/O VILLAGE- MADHURA, P.S. FULKAHA (NARPATGANJ) DISTRICT- ARARIA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26/02/2009 Above noted applications arise out of one occurrence i.e. Narpatganj (Fulkaha) P.S. Case No. have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners seek bail in a case which has been registered under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners are named accused of the case and there appears no reason of false implication. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail presently. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioners above named is rejected. However, the petitioners are at liberty to renew their prayer for bail before the court below after completion of one year in custody. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)