mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10058 OF 2009 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10059 OF 2009 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10060 OF 2009 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10061 OF 2009 Ramesh Banarasidas Agarwal Petitioner versus Ramdayal Banarsidas Agarwal @ Gupta & others Respondents Mr.Shriram Kulkarni for petitioner in all the petitions. Mr.Sachin D. Kadam for respondent no.1 in all the petitions. Mr.S.A.Sawant for respondentn no.2 in all the petitions. Mr.M.I.Pathan for respondent no.3 in WP No.10060/2009. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 15th April 2010 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner in all these writ petitions. By the impugned order the application made by the petitioner for recasting of the issues has been partly allowed. The impugned order is purely of interlocutory nature which is capable of being challenged in an appeal which may be preferred against the decree if it be adverse to the petitioner. Moreover, the observations made in the impugned order do not affect the merits of the suit and the suit is bound to be decided without being influenced by the said observations. Subject to what is observed above, no case for interference is made out. The writ petitions are rejected. (A.S.OKA, J.)