IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 829 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 170 OF 2009 SHRI MAHESH SHRIDHAR KENKRE AND 7 ORS. ... Applicant Versus SMT. MIRABAI PANDURANG SINAL LOTLIKAR ALSO KNOWN AS INDUMATI CUNDO AND 2 ORS. ... Respondent Mr. J. P. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. D. Shirodkar, Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- U. D. SALVI, J. Date:- 10th June, 2010 P.C. Heard. Perused. The undertaking was given by the appellants/ defendants not to alienate the suit property or create third party rights in the suit property till the disposal of the injunction application before the Trial Court and the undertaking had remained in force until the impugned order was passed. The order dated 14.8.2009 passed in C.A. No.170/2009 in the present appeal, limits this embargo on alienation of the suit property or creation of third party rights in the suit property till 12.10.2009, apparently, due to the error in granting ad interim relief. The protection of the suit property from alienation or creation of third party rights during the pendency of this appeal ought to have been the main concern. In these circumstances, the injunction granted by the Trial Court as regards the alienation, third party interest etc. shall remain in force till the final disposal of this appeal. The order dated 14.08.2009 stands modified accordingly. M.C.A. No.829/2009 stands disposed of accordingly. Appeal be posted for admission on 24/06/2010. U. D. SALVI, J. SMA