IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP Nos. 9439 and 9440 of 2011-D. Decided on: 03.11.2011. 1. CWP No. 9439 of 2011-D Jai Devi. Vs. State of H.P. and ors. 2. CWP No. 9440 of 2011-D Devi Singh and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, C. J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. For the petitioners : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) CMP No.11286 of 2011 in CWP No.9439 of 2011 and CMP No.11288 of 2011 in CWP No.9440 of 2011. Allowed and disposed of. CWP Nos. 9439 and 9440 of 2011. The petitioners claim work charge status/regularization with all consequential benefits from the date they completed 10 - 2 - years of continued service. Reliance is placed on the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316. 2. The learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioners submit that they would file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for them to do so. The second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The petitioners will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment, referred to above, while submitting the representation(s). 3. The writ petitions stand disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 03, 2011. (sck/krn Guleria)