IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-9008 of 2010 Date of Decision: August 06, 2010 Swaran Kaur .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Rahul Rampal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.256 dated 1.12.2009 under Sections 447, 511, 457, 380 IPC registered with Police Station, Haibowal, District Ludhiana. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent- State, on instructions from Head Constable Jatinder Singh, states that the petitioner has joined investigation and is no more required for further interrogation. Crl. Misc. No. M-9008 of 2010 [2] 3. Considering the fact that petitioner has joined investigation and petitioner is a lady, this petition is allowed. 4. Order dated 29.3.2010 is hereby made absolute and it is directed that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer, subject to the following conditions:- “(i) The petitioner shall make herself available for inter- rogation as and when required; (ii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person ac- quainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and (iii) The petitioner shall not leave India without the pre- vious permission of the Court.” This order shall enure till 15 days after the filing of final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. within which period, the petitioner shall be re- quired to seek regular bail. (AJAI LAMBA) August 06, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?