( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2884 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3686 OF 2008 Dr. Ajay s/o Devidasrao Sambare APPLICANT VERSUS Dr. Vaishali w/o Ajay Sambare RESPONDENT ..... Mr. N.B. Narwade, advocate holding for Mr. Amol N. Kakade, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.D. Sapkal, advocate for the respondent. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 18th June, 2009] PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The directions of this Court, as per order dated 11th June, 2008, were found to be not complied with in letter and spirit. There was delay in depositing the costs of Rs. 1000/- which was a condition precedent for ( 2 ) allowing the applicant to file written statement. The learned Judge of the Family Court, by order dated 28th July, 2008, rejected application of the applicant to condone the delay and allow payment of the cost and to set aside the “No WS” order. 3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, in the interest of justice, the time is extended to deposit the amount till 29th June, 2009 and with further direction that if the amount is not deposited, the right of the applicant will stand forfeited. The learned Judge of the Family Court shall expedite the final hearing of the application filed by the wife/respondent and as far as possible, shall decide the same within period of six (6) months. The petitioner shall also pay additional costs of the application to the tune of Rs. 1000 on or before 29th June, 2009. The civil application is disposed of accordingly. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/ca2884-09