IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30018 of 2009 BHULETAN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 16.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. No doubt petitioner’s name appeared in the case after months of filing of the case and in that also witness is not making any statement to watch the incident but according to the statement of witness, this petitioner had illicit relation with his wife and when similar relation was tried by the deceased, he was killed. This witness is further making similar statement for earlier incident when Dafadar was killed by this petitioner when similar attempt was made by him. After the earlier incident, some articles remained that was agitated later, upon which he was assaulted by this petitioner and his wife for which the matter was reported to the police and stage is of the anticipatory bail. Thus I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail. Hence the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)