IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND TEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.18385 of 2007 Between: Devara Lakshmi … Petitioner And The State of A.P., rep., by its Principal Secretary to Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Mangana Sree Rama Rao for Sri C. Ramachandra Raju Counsel for respondents 1-4: AGP for Home This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.18385 of 2007 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent in repeatedly paying domiciliary visits to the petitioner house and insisting her to pay Rs.1,00,000/- as illegal gratification or else threatening her to implicate in false theft and dacoit cases and in action on the part of the other respondents as against 5th respondent without receiving her complaint as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to demand any money nor did interfere in any manner with her personal life and liberty.” At the hearing, Sri M. Sree Rama Rao representing Sri C.Ramachandra Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Placing on record the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.23603 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 15.03.2010 ES