c ^ ^ ~/\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BH.ASPUR (C.G.) PETITIONER RESPO^DENTS : W.P. No..,2.^....../2002 Sadabrij alias Sadabriksha aged about 48 years S/o Anuj ram K-auwar, R/o Village Telikot Tah. Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh(C.G.) Versus 1. Ghasnin Bai aged about 45 years, Daughter ofHetram Kanwar. • 2. Ashok Kumar aged about 40 years, son of Hetram Kanwar Both residents ofVillage Mauhapali, Tah. Kharsia, ^^> ^District Raigarh (C.G.) '^^,^'^-' ^/^>- Jal PrakashAgrawal agedabout 50 years Son ofShankar '^•f^^i- /^.-^ Lal Agrawal R/o Village CUhapriganj, Tah. Kliarsia, Distt. ^4. State ofChhattisgarh Through Collector, Raigarh (,C.G.) f~' V t-S'" .^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22S/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF DMDIA FOR ISSUTNG OF WRIT MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT AND DIRECTION. f:a.. "••'^''S-'f"1"^!'"^SSf Xi-HC-22 ra -iii^id^, ^ifly'is, faflKiy CT^I^iT f^-ii'sb an§w sf;t[NT'<ii%?i ,t^s *<l*irfT<h*<l'»> __..UiJ.£:A.'3: 'zeei-t^ '""""^ 200 311^1 •B^tWHiCT Wifepfrf T]praf 4 fe3t TfW?n ^gif^sn^i 08-10-2002 Shri Ravindra Agrawal, co^uusel Shri Raabir Siagh, Govt. 4' Heard. • for the petitioner. dv. for fhe State. lis^d Tfaough fhis naatter is the short point involved, on the fhe parties, fhe petition is dispos Tbe grievaace of fhe writ 12-04-2002, whereby, durmg petition, fhe Additioxial Conunis stay Iiis dispossession. A copy c before tbe Court for its perusal cfcar that necessaiy avennents have clearly been mentioned. petition has been takcn up for h( for the authorify to give dispossession. White giving ia< could have directed the petitioi for admission aad considering ^rayer of fhe leamed counsel for ;d ofat fhe adinission stage. Ipetitioner is to fhe order dated |fhe pendency of the revision iioner, Bilaspiu- had refased to fhe stay appUcation was placed ^xid fboin a rea<ling fliereof, it is ^n which stay has been sought f^t any rate, since the revision ;^rmg, it woiild have been proper linterun protection regardiag ^itin proteetion, the authorities i^r to flu-DMh securily towards [^^SR XI-HC-22 •s^ -^ww^, 's^wss, f^oi'yy 3n^i'?n R:n?rCT5?i '^>~qT^"^I?a ^FT ^; imirthy WRT[ ShNI'h^.....^:^^^^ 311^1'FRITW'Hfet _^. +|t]fd<il-l iTPTCif •? fet?t <F».<iK ^SlPtPl 311^1 mesne profite. These aspects h, aufhority and the application rejected. As the record uidici possession wifh the land ia ^ve not been taken care ofby fhe Ebr iuteriia protection has been adic^tes, the petitiouer has been in ques|ion siace 1992. uidicdtes Considering fhe facts aa^ impugned order is set aside. It| respect to the possession shjaB pendency of the revision petitioni the Additibnal Commissioner, Bil^spur to the petitiDner fumishing secu(i1y siun ofRs, 2,500/- withia sixwe^l cuczunstances of fhe case, the is directed that status quo with be mauitaincd during fhe N0.213/A-23/2001-2002 before Division, Bilaspur, subject i1y towards luesne profits iu the ;ks fiom today. Consequently, M.W.P.No.3()8/2002 and I.A.No.2832/2002 also stand disposed of. P. C. Naik Judge [^^fa^ *1.*^^> •^