IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.16307 of 2010 ====================================================== Rabindra Ram S/O Sri Jiyut Ram R/O Vill.- Fakuli Under G.P. Kalyanpur (Western), P.O.- Tarari, Lahara Block And P.S.- Kargahar, Distt.- Rohtas (Sasaram). ........ Petitioners. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Secretary Department Of Human Resources, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 3. The District Magistrate, Rohtas (Sasaram) 4. The Member District Teachers Niyojan Appellate Authority, Rohtas (Sasaram) 5. The Block Development Officer, Kargahar, Rohtas (Sasaram) 6. The Block Education Extension Officer Kargahar, Rohtas (Sasaram) 7. The Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Kalyanpur Western Block- Kargahar, Distt.- Rohtas (Sasaram) 8. Sri Hari Kumar Singh S/O Sri Parsuram Singh R/O Vill.- ..................., Under Gram Panchayat Kalyanpur Western, Block- Kargahar, P.O., Distt.- Rohtas (Sasaram). . .... Respondents. ====================================================== 2 06.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. By Annexure-6/A dated 24.02.2010 claim of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra has been rejected by the Appellate Authority. Petitioner is aggrieved by such a rejection as well as reason for such rejection of his appeal. Submission of the learned counsel is that interpolation was made. Based on that interpolation the claim of the petitioner was rejected by accommodating some body else as would be evident from Annexure-2. However the Appellate Authority contrary to the same did not intervene in the mater and dismissed his appeal on the ground that no appointment to the post could be made after coming into force of 2006 Rules. Whatever be the origin of the dispute or merit of the claim of the petitioner, the fact stands that after the 2006 rules coming into force, the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra does not exist and if that be so no appointment on the said post can be made by issue of a direction at the stage. To that extent the order passed by the Appellate Authority is correct and in light of the above no relief can be granted to the petitioner. This writ application is dismissed as the order does not require any interference by this Court. PN (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)