IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2182 OF 2009 Shri Sakharam Madhavrao Bendbhar & Ors. ...Petitioners V/s. Sau.Janabai Moreshwar Mungase, Deceased through her heirs and legal representatives: 1.Smt.Saraswati Popatrao Mungase & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.M.B.Kale for Petitioners. None for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 26, 2009. MARCH 26, 2009. MARCH 26, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Petitioners. 2. The order impugned in this Petition is a discretionary order passed by the Court below at the interlocutory stage. Assuming that there is some error of jurisdiction committed by the lower Court in the impugned order, however, indubitably : 2 : the same is capable of being corrected at a later stage. As observed by the Apex Court in the case of Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai & Ors. Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai & Ors. Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai & Ors. reported in (2003) 6 SCC 675 reported in (2003) 6 SCC 675 reported in (2003) 6 SCC 675, in particular, in Paragraph 39, that the wrong done, if any, could be set right and the rights and equities can be adjusted in appeal or revision preferred at the conclusion of the proceedings, no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is warranted. Hence, dismissed. 3. Needless to observe that all questions raised in the present Petition are kept open to be agitated by the Petitioners in the appeal or revision to be preferred against the final decision at the conclusion of the proceedings which will have to be considered on its own merits in accordance with law. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.