IN THE mOH COURT OF CHHASTISGARH AT BILASPUR. CONTEMPT PETITION N0. OF 200 PBTITIONER: '^ ^.^e^ y%^>^' „ .%%^'"" ^^^' ^•^.y-- ^ffi^'" RESPONDHffTS: lingle Berich Dr. S. M. Ghosalkar, S/o Shri, Madhukar Ghosalkar, ag6d about 53 years, Occupation - Block Medical Officer, Community Health Centea- Charama, District - Kanker, (C.G.) VERSUS y- 1. 2. Dr. R. N. Verma , Chief Medica.1 and Health Officer, Kanker, Districf Kanker, (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION Dr. J. L. Uikey, Posted ^at Community Health Centre, Charama, District Kanker,i C, (C.G.) ; ! ' / tf^' UNDER ARTICLE 215 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTACT 1971 - >u<-" d_bv this Hon'ble court in W.P|. !.'": SiI @ ^-" HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR: CHHATTtSGARH Single Bench Hon'ble Shri H.L. Dattu, CJ. Contempt Petition No.83 OF2005 Petitioner Dr. S.M. Ghosalkar Vs. Resirondents Dr. R.N. Verma and Another Present: None appears for the petitioner. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, counsel for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 28 February, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the respondents have complied with the orders and directions issued by this Court. The assertion made by learned counsel for the respondents is not disputed on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the above, the relief sought for in this contempt petition does not survive for consideration and decision of this Court. Accordingly, the contempt petition is rejected. Ordered accordingly. (2) Consequently, I A.No.11 22/2005 stands disposed of. Sd/- Chief Justice