^ c^-^f- "^rHEJHIGIi^OURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR^ r CHHATTISGARH Sinflle BencB M.CLC. N0. ^S^ OF 2009 Ai^plicant/ ^etitioner Smt. Rashmi Sharma, W/o Santosh Kumar Sharma, aged ^0 %'. ^^"/\^^ about 39 years, R/o Ring Road ^p^^.^^' No.2, Near shitla Mandir, •••"""c'u\ •••"^v"l^""" Hirapur, P.0. Tendua, Raipur t^^.t..<0^"<=7 (CG). Non-Applicants/ ^Respondents / . Versus l^ Indian Oil Corporation Limited, through Chief Divisional Retml Sales Manager, Raipur Divisional Office, Indian Oil Bhawan, Rajiv Gan.dhi Mai-g, (VIP Road), PO Ravigram, Telibandha Raipur (CG). ^•' Senior Divisional Retail Sales Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Raipur Divisional Office, Indian Oil Bhawan, Rajiv Gcmdhi Marg, (VIP Road), PO RavigrsLm, Telibandha Raipur (CG). Union of India, through Ministry of Petroleum, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. APX*LICATION FOR RBSTQRATIOW OF WRIT PETITON (C) KLQ. 5307 OF 2006 > ^t ApDSIcant Petitioner HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BJLASPUR M.C.C.No. 284 of 2009 Smt. Rashmi Sharma VERSUS : indlan Oii Corporation Limited & Others. Non-apDilcants Respondents APPLICATiON FOR RESTORATION OFWRIT PETITION (0 No.5307 OF 2006. SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Present: Shri B.D.Guru; Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. Shri Bhisma Kinger, Advocate for the non-appllcants/ respondents ORDER fORAL) (Passed on 9th day of February, 2011) I.A.No.1 1. 2. 3. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the restoration application. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition; being W.P.(C) No. 5307/2006, was dismissed on account of the fact that the petitioner failed to make good the defauit within the time prescribed by this Court, vlde order dated 8.2.2008. Shri Klnger, learned counsei appearing for the non-applicants, opposes condonation of deiay. The explanation given by the petitioner, though, is not satisfactory. However, having regard to the facts situation of the case, wherein there was delay in filing paper book only and the petition was dismissed for non-compiiance of the Court's order, the deiay in preferring thls restoration application is condoned. Sufficient and reasonable cause has been shown. W.P.(C) No. 5307/2006, is restored to the origina! file, subjectto payment of a sum of Rs. 2000/- as cost to the High Court Legai Aid Committee. A copy of this order be placed on record of the original writ petition and the same be listed for hearinQ. ashok Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge