..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.298 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1488 OF 2008 Harinarayan G. Bajaj. ..Applicant. Versus M/s.Trimbhak Investments & Finance Services Ltd., and Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Zal Audhyanjina, Adv. i/b. Vivek Sharma, Adv. for applicant. Mr.Mihir Gheewala, Adv. for respondent Nos.1 to 6. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 22nd October, 2008. DATED : 22nd October, 2008. DATED : 22nd October, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant - orig.complainant and the learned Advocate for the respondent-orig.accused. 2. The respondents have preferred Criminal Writ Petition No.1488 of 2008 before this Court. In the said matter rule and interim stay came to be granted. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicant - orig.complainant states that the said order was ..(2).. passed exparte. Hence, this application for vacating the exparte stay has been preferred. 4. Looking to the fact that the Petition is ready for final hearing, I am not inclined to vacate the exparte stay at this stage. In my view, it would be appropriate that the Petition is taken up for final hearing. Hence, Writ Petition to be placed on the final hearing board on 1st December, 2008. In case the writ petition is not finally disposed of by 31st December, 2008, liberty to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for vacating stay. 5. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)