IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2010 / 21TH POUSHA 1931 RP.No. 1249 of 2009() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.23352/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- 1. N.K.SUNIL KUMAR, PROPRIETOR, N.K.ASSOCIATES, P.O.KOKKALUR, BALUSSERY, KOZHIKODE. 2. N.K.ANIL KUMAR, NAGATHARAKANDI HOUSE, KOKKALUR P.O., BALUSSERY, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER SRI.P.P.RAMACHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. DENA BANK, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, KOZHIKODE. 2. AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND CHIEF MANAGER, DENA BANK, CHENNAI REGIONAL OFFICE, 32, VENKATESAN STREET, T.NAGAR, CHENNAI-17. 3. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY), REVENUE RECOVERY OFFICE, VATAKARA. S.C.SRI.N.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, G.P.SRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.Ramachandra Menon, J. ----------------------------------------- R.P.No.1249/2009 in W.P(C).No.23352 of 2008 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th January, 2010 O R D E R The review petition is filed, seeking six months' more time to comply with the directions given by this Court as per the Judgment dated 25.6.2009. The learned counsel for petitioners submits that, since the judgment is a self-contained one, for extension of time, the judgment requires to be reviewed and hence this review petition. 2. After going through the averments in the review petition and also after hearing the submissions made by the learned counsel for the review petitioner, this Court finds that there is absolutely 'no error apparent on the face of the records', in the impugned judgment. However, considering the fact that the prayer is only to get extension of time and that the fixation of liability is not intended to be verified or modified in any manner, this Court deems it fit and proper to allow the prayer, in so far as the liability to satisfy the outstanding amounts by way of installments be varied, by way of 'three' equal monthly installments, the first of which shall be effected on or before the 31st of this month; to be followed by the remaining two 2 installments to be effected on or before the last working day of the succeeding months. Subject to the above, the proceedings by way of sale, as per Annexure-C sale notice issued by the second respondent, shall be kept in abeyance and the same will stand revived automatically, if the above direction is not complied with, by the petitioners, on time. Review Petition is disposed of as above. P.R.Ramachandra Menon, Judge cms