C.W.P. No.19937 of 2010 -1-` IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** C.W.P. No.19937 of 2010 Date of Decision:15.09.2011 Balraj Singh .....Petitioner Vs. The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. L.S. Virk, DAG, Punjab. Mr. V.K. Kaushal, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 to 4 submits that an amount of gratuity, CPF and others retiral benefits have been released to the petitioner except an amount of Rs.55,000/- which was subject to final outcome of the inquiry whereas learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a delay of more than two and half years and the petitioner is entitled for interest also but no interest has been paid. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the inquiry has been concluded and it has been stated in the inquiry that no financial loss has been caused to the Corporation. Learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4 submits that in case no loss has been caused to the Corporation, then an amount of Rs.55,000/- shall also be released to the petitioner. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the C.W.P. No.19937 of 2010 -2-` parties, no further interference is required now at this stage. As far as claim of interest on the delayed payment is concerned, the petitioner has already moved a representation in this regard on 7.8.2011 and the respondents are directed to decide the claim of the petitioner with regard to interest within a period of one month from today. In case the petitioner is still aggrieved by the action of the respondents, he is at liberty to avail his remedy available under law. Disposed of accordingly. September 15, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE