IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2223 of 2009 SURENDRA RAM . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 3. 10.11.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite parties. From the order of the Court in CWJC No. 2360 of 2008 it is apparent that the petitioner was in extra ordinary haste for disposal of the writ application and did not even press it on merits. He confined his relief sans for disposal of the representation. The order does not even notice what was the contents of his representation except the relevant annexure. It is not in dispute that the representation of the petitioner has been disposed. The grievance of the petitioner from Annexure C to the show cause that the representation has not been disposed in accordance with law cannot be adjudicated in a contempt petition because the order of the writ Court does not contain any discussion of the nature of the claim of the petitioner and there was no direction of the Court for a decision on a particular issue. If so advised the petitioner may question the same in a properly constituted writ application. The proceedings stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)