IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3460 of 2009 RAM NARAYAN SINGH Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 2. 23.3.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. On the own showing of the petitioner no part of cause of action has arisen within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court. It is so because the petitioner had retired from the services of Indian Army on 31st December, 1998 while stationed and posted at Secunderabad (as established from Annexure 1). Thereafter when certain decision of payment of retirement benefit including provisional pension was taken from Allahabad on 15.12.2000, the petitioner had rightly moved Allahabad High Court by filing a writ petition as is apparent from the order dated 19th November, 2001 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 37475/2001. The impugned order obviously has been passed in compliance of the order of the aforementioned judgment of Allahabad High Court. In the judgment of Allahabad High Court the residential address of the petitioner has been shown to be the 2 same as has been shown in this writ application. That being so, this Court would not find any reason to allow the petitioner to maintain this writ application before this Court, inasmuch as each and every part of cause of action against the impugned order has arisen beyond the territorial jurisdiction of this Court. That being so, this application is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. Dismissal of this writ application will not stand in the way of the petitioner to move before the appropriate court. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/