21.5.2008 Present: Mr. Rakesh Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. M. Bisht, Dy. Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 5. Mr. M. L. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.7. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No. 8 to 11. Mr. Surinder Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.12. CWP No. 456/2006 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel could not specify on behalf of the petitioner as to how any of his rights is infringed, whereby this Court may invoke its jurisdiction to exercise its discretionary powers under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. During the course of hearing, it has been brought to our notice that the old link road sanctioned under the scheme of Prime Minister Gramin Sarak Yojna, has already been constructed, available for the use of the people of the area. The petitioner could not specify as to how the mandamus could be issued for removal of an obstruction from the land which is not owned by him as for removal of obstruction or encroachment from the land owned by any other person, one has to approach to the Civil Court for appropriate remedy. Since no right what to say of any fundamental right of the petitioner is said to be effected, therefore, the prayer made in the present writ petition cannot be granted. As such, the writ petition is dismissed, so also the pending applications. ( R. B. Misra ), J. ( Sanjay Karol ), J. May 21, 2008 (rana)