IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.74 of 2011 DHIRAJ KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR For the petitioner :Mr. Vikramdeo Singh For the State :Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma ----------- 05. 25.03.2011 Heard both sides. Petitioner who is declared juvenile in conflict with law, prays for grant of bail. He is accused in a case under section 414/34 IPC. The informant was looted of his motor cycle and other belongings on gun-point. The accuseds were nabbed immediately thereafter. Two persons are said to have been arrested including the petitioner. It appears that both of them were juvenile and have been declared as such. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that father of the petitioner is prepared to give undertaking in respect of his son (petitioner) for his conduct and behaviour in case he is released on bail. It is submitted that he is in custody since 01.05.2010. Learned appellate court in paragraph 5 has recounted the criminal background of the petitioner. It appears that he is required in two other criminal cases, apart from the present one. Based on materials on record, it has been observed that there is every chance of the petitioner falling in the company of criminals/antisocial elements, if released on bail at this stage. Having regard to the said submission and materials on record, 2 learned appellate court has refused bail to the petitioner. Having heard the parties, this Court, for the present, is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail in view of the observations made in the impugned order and allegations levelled against him. Accordingly prayer for bail is rejected. Considering the fact that petitioner is in custody/remand home since 01.05.2010 and submission that father of the petitioner would take upon himself all responsibility respecting the petitioner, this Court observes that the petitioner shall have liberty to renew prayer for bail before this Court after five months. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )