1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 560 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO. 2059 OF 2005 Pratap Bhagwandas Kapadia & Anr. .. Plaintiffs. vs. M/s. Shanti Investments & Anr. .. Defendants. Mr. Kiran Jain with Ms. Nita Solankhi for plaintiffs. Mr. R.M. Ashar for defendants. CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J. CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J. CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J. DATE : 20th February, 2006. DATE : 20th February, 2006. DATE : 20th February, 2006. P.C. . The present suit is filed on bill of exchange Exhibit A to the plaint. There is also the payment of interest which is Exhibit B to the plaint. The only defence raised by the defendants is that the plaintiff who is an advocate has misused the letter head and written admission letter dated 7.5.2005 Exhibit C to the plaint being admission of liability. Even if Exhibit C dated 7.5.2005 is 2 ignored still the liability of the defendants is crystalised by Exhibit A to the plaint which is the bill of exchange. In so far as the bill of exchange is concerned, the only contention is that there is no agreement to pay interest. Interest is provided under Section 80 of the Negotiation Instruments Act. In the light of the aforesaid, there is no defence at all. The learned counsel for the plaintiffs has tendered the compilation of the original documents. The same are taken on record and marked Exhibit A collectively. Summons for judgment is made absolute accordingly. Decree as prayed. Refund of Court fee as per rules.