THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8234 of 2001 ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner is that though it fulfilled all the required conditions for admission to Grant-in-aid from 01-04-1995 instead of 01-11-1998, the respondents issued the impugned Memo.No.7655/CE.III-2/2000, dated 10-01-2001, rejecting its claim from 01-04-1995. During the course of arguments, Sri A.Rama Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that one similarly placed Junior College by name National Junior College, Nandyal, which stands on the same footing to that of the petitioner college, was admitted to grant- in-aid with effect from 20-02-1995. On the other hand, the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that inasmuch as the petitioner-College has not complied with the requirement of deposit of corpus fund to seek admission of college to Grant-in-aid prior to 01-11-1998, the claim of the petitioner is rejected. From a perusal of impugned proceedings, dated 10-01-2001, there is no indication on what ground the claim of the petitioner was rejected for admission to Grant-in-aid with effect from 01-04-1995. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner brought to the notice of this court that in the counter affidavit filed by the respondents in the earlier writ petition in W.P.No.12701 of 1998, the Government has admitted that the petitioner has complied with all the required conditions including deposit of corpus fund. Whether the petitioner-College is entitled for admission to grant- in-aid from 01-04-1995 or not is a matter to be examined by the respondents. Though it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that the petitioner’s claim was not accepted for the reason that the petitioner-College did not deposit the corpus fund to seek admission from 01-04-1995, the same is not mentioned in the impugned proceedings, dated 10-01-2001. In that view of the matter, without going into the merits of the claim of the petitioner, the impugned Memo.No.7655/CE.III-2/2000, dated 10-01-2001, issued by the respondents, is set aside and the respondents are directed to re-examine the claim of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders for admission of the petitioner College to grant-in-aid from 01-04-1995 instead of 01-11-1998. However, it is open to the petitioner College to place any other material in support of its claim for admission to grant-in-aid from 01-04-1995. Subject to the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 25-08-2009 Prv