THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.7292 of 2010 Dated:31.03.2010 Between: T.Gopal, And others. …Petitioners and The District Collector, Kurnool, And others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.7292 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioners and respondent Nos.5 and 6 are related. They are cousins. The petitioners herein obtained pattadar pass books and title deeds in respect of land admeasuring Ac.1.00 in survey No.38/1B and Acs.2.02 cents in survey No.76/2 situated at Munagalapadu Village. Respondent Nos.5 and 6 submitted appeal before respondent No.3. They claim a share in the property being children of Yerra Madduleti who was one of the five sons of Telugu Madduleti, the ancestor of the family. The Revenue Divisional Officer passed orders on 06.08.2008. She came to the conclusion that they are also entitled to be shown as legal heirs in the pattadar pass books and title deeds. The pattadar pass books issued in favour of the petitioners were cancelled. On the same day i.e., 06.08.2008 respondent No.3 passed yet another order directing the Tahsildar to issue pattadar pass books in favour of respondent No.5 and 6 in respect of land in Survey No.76/2. This is rather curious. Be that as it is, aggrieved by both the orders the petitioners preferred a revision under Section 9 of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971, to the Joint Collector, Kurnool, and the same is pending for the last about eight months. Therefore, they filed the instant writ petition again assailing the orders of respondent No.3. After hearing the Counsel for the petitioners and the Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Andhra Area), this Court is convinced that when the revision filed by the petitioners is pending before the second respondent, it is not proper to express any opinion on the merits of the case. The incongruity of the Revenue Divisional Officer passing two dissimilar orders in the same appeal petition of respondent Nos.5 and 6 can also be gone into by the revisional authority. The revisional authority is directed to dispose of the revision within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 31.03.2010 Note: Issue C.C in one week. B/o. vs