In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … COCP No. 198 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision: September 3, 2009 Ved Prabha Kapoor w/o R.L.Kapoor ..Petitioner Versus Shri Anurag Rastogi,IAS and another ..Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Ms. Anu Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ashok Jindal, Addl.A.G.Haryana for the respondents ,,, Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the orders passed by this court have been complied with after a considerable delay and therefore, she is also entitled to the interest on the amount released to her for the delayed period. Be that as it may, since the compliance of the orders passed by this court has been made, I am not inclined to proceed further with this contempt petition. Rule discharged. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek any other appropriate remedy for redressal of her grievance with regard to her entitlement for interest for the delayed period. September 3, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE