COCP No.1883 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1883 of 2008 Date of Decision:17.07.2009 Anupama College of Engineering, Bhora Kalan & anr. ....petitioners Versus Mahindra Lal, IPS & anr. .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: None for the petitioners Mr.S.K.Hooda, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondents **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): In response to the show cause notice issued by this Court, reply by way of affidavit of Mohinder Lal, IPS, Commissioner of Police, Gurgaon, has been filed wherein it has been submitted as under: “It is submitted that in pursuance of the orders dated 10.3.2006 passed by the Hon'ble High Court in Crl. Misc. No. 11604-M of 2006 filed by the petitioner the following officials were deputed to perform the duties of PSO w.e.f. 23.3.2006 to 5.5.2007. 1. Ct. Lovkesh Kumar 1717/GGM 2. Ct. Surender Kumar 1372/GGN 3. Ct. Rajpal 880/GGN 4. HC Sat Narain 317/GGN 5. Const. Raj Pal 880/GGN 6. Const. Subhash Chand 1584/GGN 7. Const. Rajesh Kumar 8. Const. Sandeep 804/GGN 9. Const. Vinod Kumar 538/GGN COCP No.1883 of 2008 2 The petitioner did not co-operate with the PSOs. Rather he misbehaved with some of them. One of the PSOs, namely Const. Raj Pal 880/GGN was misbehaved and scolded by the petitioner and even he left the PSO on the road while coming from Agra to Delhi. Besides above, the Head Constables and Constables with Arms and Ammunition were deputed to perform the Guard Duty in the premises of Annupma College from 22.3.2006 to 29.2.2008. The PSOs and the Security Guards have been deputed from time to time, but Sh. Devender Gupta has not deposited the salary of PSOs as per High Court orders and expenses of the security guards till date as per Govt. instructions issued from time to time and as such violated the directions of the Hon'ble High Court. It is pertinent to mention here that the COCP No. 581 of 2006 filed by the petitioner was disposed of by the Hon'ble High Court vide order dated 6.7.2006 (Annexure P-2). The perusal of the order reveals that the Hon'ble High Court has observed that the interim orders dated 10.3.2006 were fully complied with by the department. It was also directed by the Hon'ble High Court that if it is requested by the petitioner No.2 to provide PSO then one PSO from police Line Gurgaon at his own expenses on payment of monthly salary of such PSO by him on every first day of the Calendar Month, but subject to any threat perception to be assessed by the competent authority, may be provided. The threat perceptions to the petitioner were got assessed through Sh. Inder Singh Saini, Deputy COCP No.1883 of 2008 3 Commissioner of Police, South Gurgaon who has found that there is no threats to Sh. Devender Gupta i.e. the petitioner from any quarter. He had in the past some dispute with the villagers about which action was taken by the police and now there are no threats to the petitioner from any side. Thus there is no disobedience of the orders of the Hon'ble High Court on the part of the respondents and the present petition is liable to be dismissed." In view of the aforesaid reply, I am not inclined to proceed any further in this petition. Rule discharged. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 17.07.2009 neenu