IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41822 of 2010 1. KAPIL YADAV 2. MANTU YADAV 3. GANESH YADAV 4. SHIV JEE YADAV 5. RANJEET KUMAR 6. PIRDAMARI YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 26/03/2011 It is submitted that petitioner No.3 has been taken into custody and the application has become infructuous with regard to him. The application is accordingly rejected with regard to petitioner No.3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The submission on behalf of the petitioners 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 is of a land-dispute apparent from the allegations. There is no allegation of firearm injury to anyone to invoke Section-307 of I.P.C. considering which co-accused have been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Sessions Judge, Patna in A.B.P. No.3376/10. Learned counsel for the State is unable to point out any discussion from the impugned order distinguishing the case of the petitioners from those granted anticipatory bail. Having considered the facts and circumstances let the petitioners above named 2 surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Patna City (Patna) in connection with Daniyawan P.S. Case No.31/2010 subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) of Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)