c . S- .^° '^s' ^J IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUD1CATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION NO.SS-5-^QF 2006 PETITIONER A ...-•^.. x^yy ^V6T^ .o'.;'_'b.-'l; ^.•''rf?s'^V <^wy <si\ T ..l" .?>-^>)" ^y/ y -/ Dr. (Smt.) Ranjana ShBr'ma, W/o Dr. Ravindra Sharma, aged about 42 years, posted posted as Assistant Professor (Geography),Vishwanath Yadav Tamaskar Government P.G. Arts St Science College, Durg & R/oHIG - 11/301, M.P.H.B. Colony, Borsi, Durg, District Durg [Chhattisgarh] VE RS U S RESPONDENTS .i-'1 -?•"""' c^-& lo R-X ^^ ^i'UR ^1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, . Raipur [Chhattisgarh'] ^ 2. Princi'pal, Vishwanath Yadav Tamaskar Government P.G. Arts & Science College, Durg, District Durg [Chhattisgarh]. ^y WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS PROHIBITlON AND QTHER SUITABLE WRIt OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DlRECTlONS, QRDER OR ORDERS: XI-HC-22 iiitii s»>*nqi 3^-^raRra-, ^wi^ fq^rciy 3lldi,'l 4siqi —.U^.P..tkA'.; ^q^.u.-.>..-....tv..-.((K/ f^l' 200 •*i«fo<n.<iiticfTfffei,') <Riwi< ^^rf^ITSn^T Heard Shri Manindra Shrivast^va, Sr. Advocate with Shri A. Dalpati, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Adv. fjsrthe State on advance copy. By this petition the petitioner tjas questioned the legality, propriety and correctness of the order dated 30.6.20p6 whereby she has been transferred from Vishwnath Yadav Tamaskar Governm^nt Post Graduate Arts & Science College, Durg to Late Devi Prasad Choubey Go'l'ernment Coliege, Saja. The ground raised by the petitiofier for chailenging the transfer order is that the petitioner is suffering from Spinal Qord problem (Spondylites) and therefore, it Is difficult for her to undertake journe-i). Another ground is that the petitioner is engaged in doing research project |work. The petitioner has already made representation (Annexure P-6) fo the S^cretary, Higher Education Department, but that is not being decided by the Secre1|ary. In the cireumstances, tearned Sr. Advocate for the petitioner submits tha^ respondent No.1 be direoted to decide the representation of the petitioner after ccjnsidering the points raised by her, to which iearned Govt. Advocate for the State h|as no objection. Having heard tearned counse) for the parties and having regard to the faots & clrcumstances of the case, r^spondent No.1 is directed to decide the representation (Annexure P-6) of petitfonerwithin a periodof40 daysfrom today after considering all the points raised 1 !n the meantime; the petit representation along with copy of this| from today. With the direotion aforesaid, tt ConsequenUy, M.(W.)P.No.2| disposed of. ' Certified copy as per rules. :iy t'ne petitioner in accordance with law. 'oner is at iiberiy to make a detaiied petition to respondent No.1 within 10 days e petition stancis disposed of. 570/06 anci i.A.No.6575/06 ateo stand Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge ('flc& . -