IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9822 of 2010 MANJU KUMARI W/O MANOJ KUMAR R/O VILL.- PILACHAK, P.O. ANKHAN, P.S. DULHIN BAZAR, DISTT.- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY PRIMARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, DISTT.- PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, DISTT.- PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, DISTT.- PATNA 5. THE MUKHIYA OF GRAM PANCHAYAT, ANKHAN BHIMINICHAK, P.S.- DULHIN BAZAR, DISTT.- PATNA 6. THE PANCHAYAT SACHIV OF GRAM PANCHAYAT, ANKHAN BHIMINICHAK, P.S. DULHIN BAZAR, DISTT.- PATNA 7. SHAILESH KUMAR S/O RAMCHANDRA YADAV R/O VILL.- PILACHAK, P.S. DULHIN BAZAR, DISTT.- PATNA ----------- 02. 1.3.2011 After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State one aspect is not disputed that matter relates to appointment of a Panchayat Siksha Mitra relating to the year 2003. That post does not exist any more. Therefore, there is no occasion for this Court to intervene in the matter and give any direction in favour of the petitioner for her appointment or consideration. In so far as legality of the appointment of respondent No.8 is concerned, in the opinion of this Court this is not the right forum as petitioner has to take steps for challenging such appointment, if illegally made, in terms of the rule prevalent in this regard. If the petitioner is keen in dislodging respondent No.8 from the post she may take appropriate steps before the 2 appropriate forum but this writ application is dismissed with liberty and observation as above. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)