-: 1 :- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 7090 of 2009 The State of Maharashtra & Others. ..Petitioners. Versus Kamalakar P. Krishnaji. ..Respondent. Mr. Vinay Sonpal, AGP for the Petitioners - State. Mr. C. T. Chandratre for the Respondent. Coram : S. B. Mhase & R. M. Savant, JJ. Date : August 17, 2009. P. C. : 1. Heard. Perused the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. It is very exhaustive order. It is pertinent to note that no allegations of any loss to the Government were made against the Petitioner. It is also not alleged that any wrongful gain has accrued to the Petitioner. 2. The MAT has also found that the orders passed by the State Government in the Departmental Enquiry are not tenable in law, for good and cogent reasons stated in the order. Having perused the impugned order of the MAT, we are of the view that this is not a fit case for exercise of our writ jurisdiction. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)