IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN THURSDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2010 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 35149 of 2010(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- S.USHADEVI, U.P.S.A., SIVAGIRI H.S.S., VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE HEADMISTRESS, SIVAGIRI H.S.S., VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 141. 2. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, DEO OFFICE, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 101. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION (H) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. --------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.35149 of 2010 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of December, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is working as U.P.S.A. in Sivagiri High School, Varkala. The relief prayed for in the Writ Petition is to issue a writ of mandamus commanding the District Educational Officer to regularise the service of the petitioner as per Exhibits P1 and P2 and to grant consequential benefits to the petitioner. Exhibit P1 is a Government Order dated 11.2.2008. Exhibit P2 is the consequential order dated 23.10.2008 passed by the District Educational Officer. As per Exhibit P2, the service of the petitioner from 15.7.1997 to 31.5.1998 was regularised. The Headmistress was directed to draw and disburse the salary and allowance to the petitioner immediately. The grievance of the petitioner is that the consequential benefits as per Exhibit P2 were not granted to the petitioner. 2. Learned Government Pleader submitted that the WPC No.35149/2010 2 District Educational Officer passed Order No.B4/7347/10/K.Dis. dated 30.11.2010 sanctioning grade and pay fixation in the case of the petitioner and directions were given to the Headmistress to draw and disburse arrears of salary due to the petitioner. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted in view of the submission made by the learned Government Pleader, what is required is that the Headmistress has to comply with the directions issued by the District Educational Officer. The learned Government Pleader submitted that appropriate steps would be taken to see that the order passed by the District Educational Officer is implemented. The submission made by the learned Government Pleader is recorded and the Writ Petition is closed. If the petitioner does not get the consequential reliefs, she would be entitled to file a memo in this Writ Petition in which case the Writ Petition will get revived and it will be posted for orders. K.T.SANKARAN JUDGE csl