IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 5TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 14TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 31556 of 2009(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- THARAKUMARI,AGED 36 YEARS, W/O.ASOKA KUMAR,RESIDING AT KUZHIVILA MELE PUTHEN VEEDU,ERUVIKONAM,MULLUVILA.PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695133. BY ADV. SRI.T.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT OFFICER,KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,DISTRICT OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. MR.ALEXANDER THOMAS, SC FOR PSC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.31556 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 5th day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner applied for the post of Confidential Assistant Grade II in various departments. According to the petitioner, her name was not included in the rank list on the allegation that she did not produce her certificates for verification. The petitioner made enquiries, and submits that she was not given any intimation calling upon her to produce her certificates, and it was therefore that she could not produce the documents. It is now pointed out that urging this complaint, she has filed Ext.P10 representation before the Chairman of the 1st respondent, and even that complaint also has not been adverted to. 2. Having regard to the case of the petitioner that she has not been given any intimation calling upon her to produce her certificates for verification, I feel it is only appropriate that the Chairman of the 1st respondent should deal with the complaint of the petitioner, duly adverting to the allegations therein. WP(C) No.31556/2009 -2 This writ petition is, therefore, disposed of directing the Chairman of the 1st respondent that Ext.P10 representation filed by the petitioner shall be considered and orders thereon passed, with notice to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg