IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.553 of 2010 1. SAUKHI LAL PRASAD, SON OF LATE JAMUNA PRASAD. 2. LAXMI PRASAD, SON OF SHRI SAUKHI LAL PRASAD. 3. RAMPU PRASAD, SON OF SHRI SAUKHI LAL PRASAD. ALL RESIDENT OF MAHADEO TIMBER, KANKAR BAGH ROAD, P.S. KANKAR BAGH, TOWN & DISTRICT- PATNA :-- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, PATNA CITY. 3. KRISHNA DEVI, WIFE OF RAGHO PRASAD SINGH, DAUGHTER OF LATE CHANDRADIP YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAGHU BIGHA, P.S.- KARAIPARSURAI, DIST- NALANDA AT PRESENT RESIDING AT MOHALLA- VASHISTH VIHAR COLONY (EAST), NEW HARNICHAK, P.S.- BEUR, DISTRICT- PATNA. 4. RAVINDRA PRASAD, SON OF LATE GONAR RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KAZIPUR, P.S.- DORIGANJ (MUFASSIL CHAPRA), DISTRICT- CHAPRA (SARAN) 5. PRABHA SINGH, WIFE OF SUDHIR KUMAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- ANWARPUR, P.S.- HAJIPUR, DIST.- VAISHALI. 6. AWADHESH KUMAR, SON OF LATE CHANDRADIP YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MONIPUR, P.S.- NAGARNAUSA, DISTRICT- NALANDA :--RESPONDENTS ----------- 2. 31.5.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are 2nd Party in a proceeding under Section 144 Cr.P.C. initiated at the request of Krishna Devi bearing Misc. Case No. 292 of 2010. Learned Magistrate appreciating the possession of the petitioners over the shop-in-question under orders dated 26.05.2010 directed for maintenance of status quo but the said order, although communicated to the Officer-in-Charge, Agam Kuan Police Station under Memo No. 808 dated 26.5.2010, is not being complied with by the said Officer-in-Charge. 3. Let the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Patna City ensure compliance of his own order dated 26.05.2010 communicated to the Officer-in-Charge, Agam Kuan Police Station under Memo No. 808 dated 26.05.2010 and with this observation the Cr. Writ Application is disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)