1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5103 OF 2006 Appanna Balu Kamble & Ors. .. Petitioners. Vs. Maruti Pandurang Kamble and Others .. Respondents. Mr.Ganesh Gole for the petitioners. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 19TH OCTOBER, 2006 DATED : 19TH OCTOBER, 2006 DATED : 19TH OCTOBER, 2006 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. This petition is directed against the orders passed by the courts below on the temporary injunction application. I perused the judgments impugned in the present writ petition. Considering that there are concurrent finding recorded by the courts below and as I find there is sufficient material on record to sustain those findings and considering extremely limited jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to disturb the finding of fact this writ petition is dismissed. However, looking to the nature of controversy between the parties the trial Court shall endeavour to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible and preferrably within one year from the date of receipt of this order. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 2 2 2 (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)