THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition Nos.31480, 31482, 31595, 31597 and 31598 of 2010 DT.15.12.2010 Between: Majji Trinadha Rao … Petitioner (W.P.No.31480 of 2010) And The Sub-Registrar, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam. … Respondent (W.P.No.31480 of 2010) Counsel for the Petitioner: Dr.P.B.Vijaya Kumar Counsel for respondent: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following ORDER: COMMON ORDER: These writ petitions are filed with the common grievance that the respondent has not been receiving the documents sought to be presented by the petitioners for registration of the plots claimed to be belonging to them. At the hearing, it is agreed between the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue that a writ petition of similar nature i.e., W.P.No.8268 of 2010, was disposed of by this Court by order, dated 15.04.2010, wherein the following direction was given: “Following the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent or any other Registering Officer to consider the document presented by the petitioner for registration. Be it noted, if for any reason, the document presented is not registered, it is incumbent on the part of the Registering Officer to record and furnish reasons under Section 71 of the Act. Even thereafter, if the petitioner has any grievance, he may file appeal before the appellate authority under Section 72 of the Act. Thereafter, if any adverse order is passed by the appellate authority, the petitioner can file a suit under Section 77 of the Act.” Having regard to the fact that these writ petitions are identical to W.P.No.8268 of 2010, the same are disposed of in terms of the above re- produced order. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petitions, W.P.M.P.Nos.40051, 40053, 40181, 40183 and 40184 of 2010 filed by the petitioners for interim relief are disposed of as infructuous. (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Date: 15.12.2010. VGB