IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.721 of 2006 JAY KISHORE PRASAD @ KARU MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 7.8.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the opposite parties. This application has been filed against the order of acquittal dated 26.5.2006 passed by the Fast track Court No.3, Nawada in Sessions Trial No. 127/90/108/04. On perusal of paragraph 24 of the impugned judgment it is quite clear that there was valid and sufficient grounds for acquittal of opposite parties no, 2 and 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner failed to make out any case for interference in the impugned order of acquittal in the revisional jurisdiction at the instance of private party. Accordingly, this application is dismissed at the stage of admission itself. B.Jha (Ghanshyam Prasad)