1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2268 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.544 OF 1997 --------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or Judge's orders or directions orders and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------- Mr.Nitin Mhatre i/b.Smt.Monica D'souza,advocate, for the applicants Mr.A.C.Singh, advocate, for respondent No.1 Mr.V.A.Alameida i/b.Mr.N.N.Shah, advocate, for respondent No.2 CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 27TH MARCH,2008 P.C. . Heard the learned advocates appearing for the parties. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as of today, prayer clause (a) cannot be granted. So far as prayer clause (b) is 2 concerned, the learned advocate appearing for the respondent No.1 makes a statement that respondent No.1 does not intend to part with the possession of the suit premises or induct any third party in the suit premises till the disposal of the Appeal. Statement is accepted. In view of this statement, it will not be necessary to grant any relief against the respondent No.1. 2. The learned advocate for the applicants is not pressing for grant of any relief against the respondent No.2. 3. Hence, by accepting statement of the advocate for 3 1st respondent, Civil Application is disposed of. (A.S.OKA, J.)