1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 302 of 2009 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 190 of 2009 Mrs. Shobha Dhananjay Utekar ....Appellant Vs. 1. Smt. Smita Pankaj Utekar 2. Mr. Dhananjay Rama Utekar ....Respondents Mr. Kunal Bhanage, advocate for the appellant. Mr. Harshal K. Bhalerao, advocate for the respondents. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.A..SAYED, JJ DATED:- JULY 06, 2010 P.C. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. As the decree which is impugned in this appeal is in the nature of money decree, in our opinion, interim-relief can be granted in favour of the applicant on condition that applicant deposits amount of Rs. Two lakhs in this Court as ordered in terms of decree dated 9th October, 2009. It is stated that the 2 Appellant has already deposited sum of Rs. One lakh in this Court. If so, the Appellant is entitled to give adjustment to the said amount while depositing the decretal amount as stated above. The amount be deposited within four weeks from today failing which office to treat this Application as dismissed for non- prosecution without further reference to the Court. 3. On the other hand, if the amount is deposited in time, stay of operation of the impugned Judgment and decree till the disposal of the appeal shall continue. Besides, the amount so deposited by the Appellant be invested in appropriate fixed deposit scheme to be kept alive during the pendency of appeal. 4. Application disposed of accordingly. (A.A.SAYED, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)