1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1409 OF 2008 Nisha Bhole .. Petitioner Versus Venkatesh B. Sansthan Nashik and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.S.S.Shah for petitioner CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 3rd March 2008 P.C. . There is no reason to interfere with the interlocutory order which is impugned, at this stage, more so, when the learned Judge has refused the request of petitioner to call for the 2 documents. Merely because, the petitioner has a grievance that she requires the documents to be produced soas to cross examine plaintiff or his witness, that cannot be taken into consideration. If the petitioner is aggrieved by final order in the suit, then, while impugning the same appropriate pleas with regard to summoning of the subject documents can always be raised. All contentions in that behalf are expressly kept open. Similarly, if the learned Judge accedes to the request of petitioner and summons the subject documents, then also, all appropriate pleas are kept open. With this clarification, there is no reason to interfere. Petition dismissed. Additionally, when the petitioner steps into box, she can pray for the said documents to be summoned and such an application to be heard and decided, without being influenced by the impugned order. 3 (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)