HGH CGURT OF CHHATWSGARH’AT B§LASPUR ’ WRIT PETITION (S) No. 7403 of 2009 WRH' PETmON UNDER ARNCLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF éNDIA S8: Hen'hie Shri Satish K. Anihotr . Presseni’: Shri A.S.Rajput, Advocae f0: the petitioners. Shri NVNRay, Panel Lawyer for the state. “ y f D ) (Passed on 1? da c ecember, 2009 e h With the consen‘t of th parties, the matter is taken up for earing finaSIy. i, The petitiener was initiaiiy appointed as Assistant Teacher o a fixed oay of Rs. 5M. After oomption of probation period$ he was granted regular pay soaie of Re. 16§-3{JO/-. N—“OA r . Learned counsel appearing for the petioner submits that the issue invoived in the case is asto wheher, the petitioners are entitied to reguiar pay scaie waif the—date (of nitiai appointmen or after oompietion of probation period. . The issue invOived, hein was considered by the Mao‘hya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunai; Jabaipur in QA. No. 2745i (Madhukant Y d V o hei t th simiiariy situated teachers are entitiec to reguiar pay scaie wet. the date of initiai appointment. The matter was taken up to Hon‘bie Supreme Court in Speciai Leave PetitioniCivii) No. 6892/93 The said peti ion was dismissed by the Hon'bie Supreme Court uphoiding the \\ decision of the Tribunai to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant adu an 56 others s. 3tate of MP. & thers), wern it was heici tha e i qL J t ORDER (ORAL) n 1 te ti t i t er 89 PETfTiONER : Narendra Singh Sakarwar. RESPONDENTS VERSUS _ : State af @ Teachers are entitied to regular pay scaie from date of initial appointment. 4i Learned counsel appearing for the petitipners aiso submits that this court, whiie considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ham & others v. Srare of Chhazi‘fs‘garh & oz‘hers PNP. (S) No.4?25/2OD6] by order dated 01.09.2006, aiiowed the petitioners to make a representation within a peried of ten days, raising ail their grievances. ' 5. Accordingiy, the petitioners are granted iiberty t0 make a representation raising aii his grievances in the tight of the aiorestated judgment and the judgment dated 20.01.2009, passed in RariqAhmed Meman V. Stare of Cimaz‘n‘sgari? é? Qfhers’, and in turn, the concerned respondent ie directed to decide the representations, it any, tn accordance with law. on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, subject to verification of the facte. —’r34—A i 6. in View of the foregoing, this petition is dispoeed of. No order asto COS'ES. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge l WPKS) 7090 of2ti03