IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 15TH OCTOBER 2009 / 23RD ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 27931 of 2009(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- PURUSHOTHAMAN, S/O.RAMAN, GOVINDAVILASAM, IRUMBANGAD (PO), EZHUKON, KOLLAM. BY ADVS. SRI.C.HARIKUMAR SMT.MOLLY KOSHY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PUNALUR, KOLLAM. 2. SASI.K., S/O.KOCHUCHERUKKAN, ELLUMVILA VEEDU, IRUMBANGAD (PO), EZHUKON, KOLLAM. 3. KUNJAMMA, W/O.SIVANANDAN, ELLUMVILA VEEDU, IRUMBANGAD (PO), EZHUKON, KOLLAM. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, EZHUKONE POLICE STATION, KOTTARAKKARA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. T.K. VIPINDAS -R1, R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO. 27931/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: Ext.P1: A true copy of the sale deed No.956/06 dated. 5.5.2006. Ext.P2: A true copy of the tax receipt issued from the Revenue Authorities and containing the Thandaper number in favour of the petitioner dated 1.7.2009. Ext.P3: A true copy of the judgment of the Munsiff Court, Kottarakkara dated 24..8.2007. Ext.P4: A true copy of the decree dated 24.8.2007. Ext.P5: A true copy of the Execution Petition No.49/09 dated 28/5/09. Ext.P6: A true copy of the FIR of the crime No.340/2009 dated 8.6.2009. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ. --------------------------------------------- W.P. (C) NO. 27931 OF 2009 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of October, 2009 JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. This Writ Petition is filed with the following prayer: “a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to the 4th respondent to afford adequate protection to the life of the petitioner and property of the petitioner against the illegal acts of respondent numbers 2, 3 and their men trespassing upon the property of the petitioner and obstructing the petitioner to tap the rubber trees.” Despite service of notice and despite the interim order dated 9.10.2009, there is no appearance. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader with regard to the facts and circumstances stated in the Writ Petition. Having regard to Ext.P3 judgment of the civil court, we are of the view that the petitioner is entitled for the relief. W.P.(C) No. 27931/2009 2 Therefore, the Writ Petition is allowed in terms of the prayer extracted above. (KURIAN JOSEPH) JUDGE (C.T. RAVIKUMAR) JUDGE sp/ W.P.(C) No. 27931/2009 3 KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ. W.P.(C)NO.27931/2009 JUDGMENT 15th October, 2009 W.P.(C) No. 27931/2009 4