E HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHAT'HSGAR T BILASPU iwr W/2007‘, it‘Petmon (S) MS INS TH ha L n So 1. nan Ag 3 , ed about 3 years O 'Mndir Hasau ahs1 src- . 4 ETITI- VSS ERU St h ate of Chhamsgar hrouh Te ecrea Dapartmen Maplya traa \ Re evenu 'JS; B Wan, air é c61m¢ibnuRaipur (cg) RIT PETITION UNDER ONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE APPROPRIATE WRIT, O RIONs RDER QR DlECT H A R Bi al Aant / R At 7 R/ é d --Ti a; Ditit— Raipur (C.G) PONER : / . Tg h Stry t D K h » ‘Rpumdéa W ARTICLE 226 OF THE C OF ‘V‘P‘ETIIIONER H1GH COUREQEQHHATTISGARH BILASPUR IT PETITION (S) NO 5808 OF 2007 BhaILaI Anant . H Versus State of Chhamsgarh & Another (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of tndla) Single Bench Hon ble Shn Satlsh K Agmhotn J ww..4m .amw an. no. u... sent: ShnGoutam Bnadun Advocate forthe petmoner ,, W .‘s'j w r Shn ‘AjltVSmghgPanel Lawyer fogthe §tate.a= a r; RESPONDENT$ mm“ w $RDER n 4 v his 2 ) .g‘ (Passecf on t 43a day of $eptember 201 1 “Learned counsel appearing for the petltloner submNS that Vlde order dated 07 07 2007 (Annexure P/1) the petitioner working as Patwan has been ’ transferred from Mandlr Hasaud to Ganyaband However by Virtue of "order dated 03.10.2007, the order dated 07.012007, which rs Impugned t“ ‘ 1 herein could not'be given‘effect to,~whher(ein'this Court'directedv ho maintain status quo Learned‘oounsei further submits that the petitioner is ‘ continuing at the original ptace of posting 'Srnce more than four years have passed and in View of the order dated 03 10 2007 the g at the original place of posting, nto the merits of the case at this stage Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the Government » may be granted liberty to pass a fresh order wrthout insisting on *compliance of order dated 07 07 2007 In respect of me petitioner ‘ ‘ln View of the above submission p y n ” thus It is not nece rned counsel for the ’ petitioner nothing survrves for adjudication at thls shge ‘5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforestated ' observation and liberty, if souadvised Satxsh K Agmhot“ Judge \ l Sd/- V ‘ E ashok WR Pre _ I s a - l