IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28882 of 2008 BRAJESH KUMAR YADAV @ PINTU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 13.08.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the state. The petitioner, Brajesh Kumar Yadav @ Pintu Yadav is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 534(C) of 2006 in which cognizance has been taken against the petitioner u/S 498A of the IPC and section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioner is alleged to be husband of Anila Kumari, daughter of the complainant, Nand Kishore Yadav. Counsel for the petitioner submits that in fact there is no relationship of husband and wife in between the petitioner and Anila Kumari as marriage itself was not solemnized. The petitioner was kidnapped by the complainant and others. A case was instituted for offence u/S 363, 365/34 of the IPC against them. The trial court has convicted the complainant and others u/S 365 of the IPC. It has also been submitted that in order to create a defence, present complaint case has been instituted by the complainant. Considering the fact, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner named-above - 2 - is allowed. In the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, he will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with above-mentioned case to the satisfaction of SDJM, Khagaria. AKV/ (Mridula Mishra,J.)