THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1973 OF 2011 Dated: 09.06.2011 Between : 1. Javvadi Subhash Chandra Bose and 2 others. … Petitioners And M/s.UBK Chits and Investments Private Limited, Eluru, W.G. District. … Respondent THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1973 OF 2011 ORDER : This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 24.03.2011 in E.A.No.217 of 2011 in E.P.No.70 of 2008 in O.S.No.110 of 2000 on the file of the Court of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Eluru. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The material available on record shows that O.S.No.110 of 2000 which was filed by the respondent herein for recovery of money due from the Revision petitioners was decreed on 31.08.2007. Pursuant thereto, E.P.No.70 of 2008 was filed for realisation of the decretal amount by sending the judgment-debtors/Revision petitioners to civil prison alleging that the judgment-debtors were deliberately evading payment of the decretal amount. The judgment-debtors/Revision Petitioners filed a counter contesting the execution proceedings. During the enquiry, the judgment-debtor No.1 got himself examined as R.W.1 and while the matter was coming up of further evidence, the judgment-debtor No.1/1st petitioner herein filed E.A.No.217 of 2011 with a prayer to take out summons to the Chit Registrar, Eluru through the Court for giving evidence regarding chit fund business carried on by the decree-holder. After hearing both the parties, the Court below by order dated 24.3.2011 dismissed E.A.No.217 of 2011 and aggrieved by the same the present Civil Revision Petition is filed by the judgment-debtors. As could be seen the affidavit filed in support of E.A.No.217 of 2011 was absolutely silent about the purpose for which the attendance of the Chit Registrar was required by the judgment-debtor No.1. Admittedly the judgment and decree in O.S.No.110 of 2000 became final and the execution petition is filed for realisation of the decretal amount. In the absence of any specific reason for summoning the Chit Registrar in execution proceedings, the Court below had rightly dismissed E.A.No.217 of 2011. The said order is in conformity with provisions of Order 16 Rule 5 of C.P.C. and cannot be held to be erroneous on any ground whatsoever. Hence the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 09.06.2011 gbs