IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2008 / 6TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 14952 of 2007(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SR.ALIAMMA A.J.,CLERK, ST.LITTLE THERESA'S GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,VAIKOM. BY ADV. SRI.BENOY THOMAS RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRSENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTURCTION, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOTTAYAM. 4. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFICER, KADUTHURUTHY,KOTTAYAM. 5. MANAGER, ST. LITTLE THRESA'S GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, VAIKOM. 6. TOMY KURIAN, PEON, ST. LITTLE THRESA'S GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,VAIKOM. BY ADV. SRI.K.R.KURUP SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR SRI.K.J.ABRAHAM SRI.LAVARAJ M.G. SRI.C.R.VINOD KUMAR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.T.B.RAMANI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P(C).No. 14952/2007 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1. COPY OF THE appointment ORDER DTD.1.7.06 BY R5. P1A. COPY OF THE APPROVAL ORDER DTD.7.12.89. P1B. COPY OF THE APPROVAL ORDER DTD.6.4.2000 OF EARLIER APPOINTMENT. P2. COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY R5 DTD.19.7.06. P3. COPY OF THE ORDER DTD.18.12.06 BY R4. P4. COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DTD.1.7.06 BY R5. P5. COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD.9.1.07 IN W.P.C.NO.909/07 OF THIS COURT. P6. COPY OF THE ARGUMENT NOTE DTD.19.2.07. P7. COPY OF THE ORDER DTD.18.4.07 ADDL.D.P.I. P8. COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DTD.25.2.05. P9. COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DTD.30.8.00. P10. COPY OF THE LETTER DTD.1.7.06 BY R1 TO THE MANAGER. P11. COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BY THE MANAGER DTD.22.7.06. P12. COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DTD.2.7.07. Sdk+ ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 14952 of 2007 ================== Dated this the 26th day of March, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext.P7 order passed by the Director of Public Instruction, whereby the claim of the petitioner for appointment as Clerk in the 5th respondent school has been rejected in favour of the 6th respondent. The learned counsel for the 6th respondent raises a contention that against Ext.P7 order, the petitioner has a remedy by way of revision before the Government. This could not be disputed by the petitioner. In the above circumstances, I am inclined to relegate the petitioner to the remedy by way of revision before the Government. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to move the Government in revision against Ext.P7 order. To enable the petitioner to do so, the interim order passed on 3.8.2007 shall continue for a period of one month. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2