- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.263 OF 2004 Narona Anthony Pascal Julien & Anr. .. Petitioners Vs. Slum Rehabilitation Authority & Others. .. Respondents -- Shri R.V.Pai for the petitioners. Shri Narulla for the respondent Nos.5 to 9. -- CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J DATED : 23rd December, 2004. P.C. 1. The learned advocate for the petitioners and the learned advocate for the respondent Nos.5 to 9 are present in the contempt proceedings initiated for non-compliance of the order dated 17th May, 2004 passed in the A.O.Appeal No.72 of 2004 and have submitted that the said Appeal No.72 of 2004 itself has been settled and disposed of on 19th October, 2004, and consequent thereto, the order dated 17th May, 2004 passed in the said Appeal does not survive. They have further submitted that in view of the settlement arrived at and disposal of the said appeal, - 2 - on account of the pendency of the present proceedings, the further progress of the scheme for developing the units is disturbed, and therefore, it will be necessary to dispose of the present proceedings and in the circumstances, the parties do not press for proceeding against the respondents for contempt of Court. 2. Considering the submissions made above and considering the fact that the A.O.Appeal No.72 of 2004 wherein the order dated 17th May, 2004 was passed, has been disposed of pursuant to the settlement arrived at between the parties and considering the nature of the order dated 17th May, 2004, the request by the petitioners for withdrawal of the present petition is accepted and the contempt petition accordingly stands disposed of. 3. Authenticated copy be given to the parties. -----