IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18455 of 2010 ----- Janki Devi, wife of Late Gopal Mishra, resident of Village and P.O.-Harnahi, P.S. Baruraj, Via- Motipur, District-Muzaffarpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Chief Engineer, Irrigation Department, Muzaffarpur. 4. The Executive Engineer, Planning and Design Division No.3, Muzaffarpur. 5. The Provident Fund Officer, Muzaffarpur, District-Muzaffarpur. 6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ----Respondents 2. 9.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the learned counsel for respondent-Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that although her husband retired from the service on 31st of January, 1998 and later died on 8th of March, 2008, but while fixing the pension, the period spent by her husband on the work charged establishment was not taken into consideration as required to be done as per the Government circular, vide Memo No.1503 dated 27th of March, 1987, as contained in Annexure 4. Learned counsel for the State submits that the grievances of the petitioner need to be verified from the record. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of the aforesaid grievances, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Executive Engineer, Planning and Design Division No.3, - 2 - Muzaffarpur (respondent no.4), with a copy to respondents no.3 and 6. The petitioner also proposes to file a fresh representation before the Provident Fund Officer, Muzaffarpur (respondent no.5) with respect to her grievances against provident fund dues. In case such representations are filed stating the details of her respective grievances as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in her respective representations be considered by the concerned respondents in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances may be settled at the earliest to enable the petitioner to receive her revised pensionary benefits. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)