IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc.24013-M of 2008 DATE OF DECISION : SEPTEMBER 24, 2008 SUMA & ANR. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. MS Dhami, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. KS Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners are illiterate persons. They got married, however, against the desires of respondents No.4 to 8. Learned counsel for the petitioners has drawn the attention of the court towards Annexure P-1 i.e. statement given by Suma (petitioner No.1), who appeared as CW-1 in a complaint filed by the petitioners, wherein she has admitted the factum of marriage and further that the petitioners have a genuine threat from the private respondents. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, SHO, Police Station, Talwara, Tehsil Mukerian, District Hoshiarpur, is directed to treat a copy of this petition as a representation and ensure the protection of the petitioners, in case the threat perception is found to be genuine. The petition is disposed of. September 24, 2008 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE