IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATuyUAKH AY BtLASPUR fCHHATTISGARH) Contempt Case(C) No. J3 /2011. (Arising out of oyder dated 29.06.10 passed in writ petition(8) No"3036/2010 by Hon'ble High Covrt.) PETITIONER:^/^ ^H.iralal vishwakarma, son ofBabadeen ^->/'~ ..^/Vishwakarma, aged about 62 years, i .y /••'' -Retired Ranger, Forest Division .,/•'/1- .<•\ Manendragarh, Sarguja Circle, .•"' p'~ .'/ N " Ambikapur, District Korea, ^/r,vf: .-'^ Chhattisgarh. »/^.A^ Versus ^ ^ ^t ,rt- Respondents (Contemnors) Shri V.Shetty, Conservatorof Forest (Incharge), Sarguja Forest Circle, Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh. C^)NTEMPT;P^mONUNDERAK!lCLE2150FTHE 1\ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OP COURTS ACT. B K:SB^s''';;ys'Si, t-: 75T "i<l<<ld*i, yxll-!-!'i6, [siWI'(-!^< ~ &£>^(C ) ^IP sn^i'^'ft^ ^sn sn^r ^^ "Y^ Ueepi; TOllW^lft'ia^I qil^irt'i'KVS^ •? fezt TfetgTC •^T StRftT 3"t5T SB : Hon'bie Shri manindra MohaniShrivastav^J. 06-09-2011 ! Snri Mansh Khuntiya, counsel I Shri Ashish Cilaudhary, counsl •or tne petitioner. 61 for responaent No.1. in this contempt petition, thelpetitioner is alieging wiiifui disobedience of order passed by this Court on 29/'Qg/"2010 in Vv.P.(S) No.3036/10. Initially, the originai respondent - V. Shetty was impieaded in the contempt petition ana aiiegations are maae against nim, aiieging non-compliance OT tne uourt's oraer. in view of tne repiy \s that he was posted as Incharge, Cortservator or horest oniy Tor a snon penoa i.e. from 6/7/2010 to 4/8/2010 and that tijie order ofthe Court was served in the office on!v on ^B///^U10. l am not inciinea l Upon disciosure made in the newiy added respondent No.2 w^s posted, appiication for impleadment of rssponaent N0.2 was eanier altowea allegations in tnis petition have oeei anetty ana mough responaent NO.^ Tnerefore, this petition is disposed properiy constituted petition. rhich nas Deen filed by snri v. anetty stating •3 proceed against the respondent - V. Shetty. repiy of Shri V.Shetty that after 4/8/2010, the <>n 8/7/2011. However, it is found that all the \\ leveled aflainst oniv resDondent No.1 - V. nas oeen impleaded, tnere are no specmc aileflations aaainst him nor necessaflv avermems nave Deen maae in me petiuon. off resen/ing libertv to the petitioner to file Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge