IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 7TH MARCH 2011 / 16TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 6888 of 2011(I) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SUDHEER, 787, KILIYANVILAKAM, KANNAMANGALAM, VAKKOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR SMT.ANITHA RAVINDRAN SMT.S.MEERA SMT.M.G.AISHWARYA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KADAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-691 533. 4. ST.SEBASTIAN'S CHURCH, CHERUVAIKKAL, NEAR AIRPORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN-691 533. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.6888 OF 2011(I) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of March, 2011 J U D G M E N T What is complained of in this writ petition is the delay on the part of the 3rd respondent in passing orders on Ext.P8 where petitioner seeks mutation of the property covered by Ext.P1 possession certificate and title deed, copy of which is not produced. It is seen from the pleadings that with this grievance petitioner had approached the Lok Ayukta by filing Complaint No.235/2011. In that application, after hearing all parties including the 4th respondent, Lok Ayukta passed Ext.P10 order dismissing the complaint. The reason stated in Ext.P10 is mainly that a civil suit involving the property in question is pending consideration of the civil court and therefore mutation cannot be effected at this stage. Petitioner has no case that suits are not pending or that the application does not cover the property which is the subject matter of the civil suit. If that be so, I am not inclined to grant any direction as sought by the petitioner. 2. Having regard to the above it is also not necessary for this court to examine the correctness or otherwise of Ext.P8 order WPC.No. 6888/2011 :2 : of the Lok Ayukta. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/