IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3226 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision:29.05.2009 M/s Vishnu Processors ...Petitioner versus M/s Sudarshan Seva Trust and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr. Parveen K. Kataria, Advocate, for the petitioner. ----- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? K.Kannan, J.(Oral) C.M. No.13451-CII of 2009 Application is allowed as prayed for. Civil Revision No.3226 of 2009 1. The revision is against the order dismissing an application for framing of additional issue regarding the locus standi of the petitioner to file the petition. The Rent Controller dismissed the petition saying that there was already an issue regarding the maintainability of the petition and that issue would take care of the issue regarding the locus standi also. 2. Though there is no serious error of the order which is passed, but I am still inclined to accept the prayer of the respondent. A plea of locus standi is at once different from the plea regarding the maintainability. An additional issue if it is framed is not going to deflect Civil Revision No.3226 of 2009 (O&M) - 2 - the course of trial and no prejudice could be caused. The additional issue as sought for namely whether the petitioner has locus standi to file the petition, be framed with onus of proof cast on the respondent. 3. The Civil Revision is disposed of accordingly. ( K.KANNAN) JUDGE 29.05.2009 sanjeev