<\^^.....-r;-r ^..'-•^;"?"^..'?.^- ,?,.-•••••-""/^^^3..^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHRATTISGARH W.P. (G.) N0. ^5& of 2006 PETITIONER /S.C. Jain, son of Late Shri Roopchand Jain, aged about 55 years, Sub Engineer, Electrical and Mechanical, Sakri, Bilaspur, R/o. Bangalipara, Sarkanda, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^. State of Chhattisgarh through The Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources Department, Civil Lines, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) /-• ChiefEngineer, Water Sources Department, Hasdeo Kachhar, near Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur (C..G.) .-O"^ ^b " J ^£y .C^f' \r/ €>• ^' •^? ^' ?te2% WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION ''v^f. ^ 1 OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT(S) IN THE i NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARY, DIRECTIONfS) Executive Engineer, Electrical and Mechanical, Light Machinery, Tubewel, and Gate Division, Sakri, Bilaspur (C.G.) XI-HC-22 311^1 ^T R-fi«b3TI^T sbtli*5?5cT ><• •i^' ^ ^p^ 3:5? •^ll'i|lc)<t, O^flwiS, KctKriy W^t 4s|^b tITWTT BiNIth r?^ ff:^^o&200 sn^rgtdraTflfitT 30-11-2006 Dr. N.K. Shukia, Sr. Actvt petitioner.. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt| Heard. Petitioner who was' workl reorganization of States his ser( and as a result thereof he is worl] It is alleged that State of Chhat1| Engineers due to oversight Q(| petitioner in the. gradation list, ai) with necessary servioe benefits ii it is not in dispute thatth) the State or Chhattisgarh finally) Government on 30-5-2005. It is make any representation to the gradation list maintained by the In view of the above, representation to the competent the competent authority, shall a same within a further period of representation. With the aforesaid directii Consequentiy, M.(W.).P. disposed of. Certified copy as per rule: =bl*lffl4)-1 IflKdl ffte^t<Rl«;K ^3(R|IT3D^T cate with Shri Shailendra Shukla. counsel forthe Advocate for the State. |ng in the ersbvhile State of Madhya Pradesh, on flces were allocated to the State of Chhattisciarh |;ing as Sub Engineer in the State of Chhattisgarh. fsgarh while maintaining the gradation list of Sub otherwise could not incorporate the name of |d in absenoe of his name in the list he may suffer future. |e semces of the petitioner have been ailocated to after acceptance of the proposal by the Centrat ^lso not in dispute that petitioner thereafter did not [sompetent authority for inserting his name in the )epartment. petitioner is directed to submit his detailed ^uthoritywithin a period of30 daysfrom todayand (ter' submission of the representation, decide the |wo months from the date of presentation of the |ins the writ petition stands disposed of. No.4723/2006 & I. A.No. 11008/2006 also stand Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge (ift^^Nt)