N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.p.Nolec&?04 ; Mohd. Hassan Khan, S/o. Shri Ali ffwmad Khan, Partner of M/s. M PETITIONER ahadeo Transport Service High Court Raod Bilaspur. (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through RESPONDENTS ." ,.;"',g:‘f‘Secretary v: Department of Transport, D.K.S Bhawan Raipur. State Transport Authority Office of Transport Commissioner Raipur. State of Madhya Pradesh, Through Secretary Department of Transport Vallabh Bhawan Bhopal. State Transport Authority MPT Gwalior. MP. State of Road Transport Corporation Through Managing Director Bhopal. RIT PETITION UNDEVR ARTICLE 226 2 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. a 1* v}? 1% §§ 3?a:aRmaa,§R%Ena, $HRER WW ....\,4\,):.¥.‘. xw. a www$($ §W§) WWW \6‘\ W260 WWW mmm WW§§€TW %a%?ana?r%¥1 3arve E4—1—20G5 On a menfior: being made, i case is faken up for hearing. Heard Shri E. K. Qaw counsel far irhe paTiTioner. $hri P. K. Verma, Addi‘ A. wi?h Shri Sume$h 3ajuj, DepL €214. for respondenfs 1 and 2. EEhri QaJeev Shrivasm counsei for resaenden?s 3 fa 5. Lgama§ gounggi for 1 pe‘i’i?ianzr submiTmd Tina? ‘i'erm The ‘remporar‘y permit has clrac axpirad, fherefora, fhis pefif hw became infruc‘wous. Tha paf‘n‘ian is dismisszd having become hfruc‘runus. Q4$¥i i \ 3’12 he 3f ‘dv 0n GS Sdl- L.C. :i‘\ Bhadoo Judge GRPRIwFS/350~12/2000 50,000‘