IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.3565 of 2011 Date of Decision: 19th April, 2011. Ramesh Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & Others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present: Ms.Savita Tanwar Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Sunil Nehra, Sr.Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. * * * MAHESH GROVER, J. Learned State counsel, on instructions from Sh.B.B.Gupta, Workshop Superintendent, states that the petitioners have already filed a civil suit for redressal of their grievance which includes permission to appear in the examination and attend classes. The position is not controverted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that respondents No.7 and 8 are liable to be punished as they inflicted corporal punishment upon him which fact is being denied. In view of this, I am of the opinion that this is a disputed question of fact, and therefore, the writ petition to this effect is also misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. (MAHESH GROVER) 19th April, 2011. JUDGE Seema- II