IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10102 of 2010 1. ANIL SINGH SON OF LATE BISO SINGH 2. PANKAJ KUMAR @ PANKAJ SINGH SON OF ANIL SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 31.3.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 324, 326, 307, 120B, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that even though the petitioners are named in the first information report the specific overt-act has been alleged against co-accused Baidyanath Singh and Dhillan Singh as also the submission that the petitioners were witnesses in an earlier case against the informant for the murder of the petitioner no.1’s brother and the uncle of petitioner no.2 and, therefore, implicated, let the petitioners above named, who are in custody since 2.2.2010 and have no criminal antecedents, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Lakhisarai in Lakhisarai P.S.case No.511 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail - 2 - and (iii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )