IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 22432 of 2008 Between: M. Venkatesham Goud, S/o. Adavaiah Goud R/o.2-10, Gachi Bowli, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, West Zone, Serilingampally, Hyderabad, rep. by its Commissioner. 2 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Serilingampally Circle, Hyderabad, rep. by its Deputy Commissioner. 3 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Serilingampally Circle, Hyderabad, rep. by its Town Planning Officer. 4 The Station House Officer, Rayadurg Police Station, Cyberabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondent in preventing the petitioner from undertaking construction in his site in Survey No.91, admeasuirng an extent of 498 sq. yds. situated at Gachi Bowli, Serilingampally Municipality inspite of permission granted by the 1st respondent i.e., the Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, West Z o n e , Serilingampally by his proceedings No.G/238/BP/WZ/43H8/2007, dated 20.12.2007 as bad, illegal, arbitrary, opposed to law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: (SC FOR MCH CIRCLES 3&5)KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 22432 OF 2008 ORDER: 1. This writ petition has been ﬁled by the petitioner with a prayer to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in preventing the petitioner from undertaking construction in his site admeasuring an extent of 498 square yards comprising Survey No. 91 situated at Gachi Bowli, Serilingampally Municipality as illegal. 2. When the writ petition came up for admission, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing the writ petition against 4th respondent. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed against the 4th respondent. 3. Smt . Kalpana Ekbote takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. 4. Learned standing counsel reports, on instructions, that if the petitioner is constructing the building as per the sanctioned plan, the respondents 1 to 3 will not interfere. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage directing the respondents 1 to 3 not to interfere with the construction of the petitioner, if the construction being made by the petitioner is in accordance with the sanctioned plan vide Proceedings. No. G/238/BP/WZ/43H8/2007, dated 20-12-2007. No order as to costs. ______________________________ Justice B. Seshasayana Reddy 15th October, 2008 C.C. tomorrow B/o KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 22432 OF 2008 15th October, 2008.