IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12801 of 2011 MOTI LAL SOREN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 03.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Originally, the informant filed complaint petition on 11.6.2009 and the said complaint petition was converted into Amarpur (Fullidumar) P.S. Case no. 162/2009. It would appear from perusal of the first information report that the alleged occurrence took place on 17.5.2009 but admittedly, the complaint petition was filed after much delay. Annexure 2 to this petition reveals that the informant has received simple injuries though one injury has been found on his chest. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the informant’s wife was a consenting party and, as a matter of fact, an altercation took place between the petitioner and the informant on the alleged date of the occurrence but subsequently, with false allegation, informant lodged instant case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Moti Lal Soren, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Session Judge FTC No. V, Banka in Sessions Trial no.895/2010 arising out of Amarpur (Fuillidumar) P.S. Case no. 162/2009. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)