€ <2\ Petitioners Respondents HIGHCOURTOF CHHATTISGARH: BtLASPUR Writ Petition No. 627 of 2006 1. Jeevan Singh Oruva, S/o. Shri Surtt Singh, aged about 45 yeare, R/o. Vtllage Kotri, Teh. Lormi, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). 2. Mangtu Ram Sahu, S/o. Guhira Ram Sahu, aged about 45 years, R/o. Village Kotri, Teh. Lormi, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, G.E. Road, Raipur(CG). 2. Director of Publie Instructions, Govt. of C.G. Directorate of Education ( D.P.I. Office) Pension Bada, Raipur (CG). 3. Deputy Director of Pubfic Insfruction, Education Department, Dtetrict Bilaspur (Writ Petition under Articte 226/227 ofthe Constifaition of India) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri K.Tm'ari,AdvocateappearsQnbeha!fofShriAlokNigam, counsal for the petitioners. Smt. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passedon this 7th dayofAugust, 2008 With the consent of leamed counsel appearing for the parttes, the matter is^heard finallv. 2 Leamed counset appearing for the petitioners submits that fhe peUtioners do not want to press this matter on merit, however, ttie petitioners pray for liberty to make a representation before the respondent authorib'es to consider the same, in accordance with iaw as expeditiously as possible, to whteh learned counsel appearing for the respondente/State has no objection. L. agpnf inoqiugv "M qspcs -/PS •siqissod se Apes se A|snoitjpadxa twe\ i(li aouepjoooe ui pajspisuoo QOJ Aeiu stues ei|i 'epeui si uosetuessjdej SIR lueAe 94} U| 'AMeqji ps^Bis OAOqe eift qiim P pasodsip si uoitjiad ®itt'AiBuipjooov £ nh»