... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.89 OF 2001 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri V.B. Rajure for the Appellant. Shri Dilip Taur i/by Smt Varsha Palav for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 15, 2006. : JUNE 15, 2006. : JUNE 15, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Rajure appearing for the Appellant. The Appeal is preferred for challenging judgment and order dated 22nd April, 1998 passed by the learned IIIrd Additional District Judge on an Application under section 10 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 made by the Appellant. The prayer in the Application is for custody of the Appellant’s son Omkar. By the impugned judgment and order, the said prayer has been rejected. 2. The Application made by the Appellant before the Trial Court discloses that the date of birth of her son is 18th January, 1988. Thus, the son Omkar is no longer minor now. In view of this position, Appeal does not survive and the same is disposed of. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE