IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2009 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 LA.App..No. 606 of 2007() ------------------------- LAR.384/2000 of PRL.SUB COURT, KOZHIKODE .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------ THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR,(LA), KOZHIKODE. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS & RESPONDENT NO.2 IN LAR ------------------------------------------ 1. SIVANANDAN, S/O BALAKRISHNAN, VALLIL HOUSE, EDAKKAD P.O. 2. THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION, KOZHIKODE. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` L.A.A. No. 606 of 2007 B ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2009 J U D G M E N T Pius C. Kuriakose, J. Eventhough the submissions of the learned Government Pleader in this appeal, which pertains to acquisition of land for the formation of parallel road to Canoli Canal, are attractive, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal. It is noticed that the appeal preferred by the government against some of the other cases covered by the impugned common judgment is dismissed, confirming the rate of enhancement granted. We have perused copies of the judgments in L.A.A.Nos.552/2007, 888/2007 etc. It is seen from these judgments that the judgment relied on in the impugned common judgment was also confirmed by this Court. Under these circumstances, this appeal will stand dismissed. No costs. (PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) (K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE) aks