S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO. 2743/2009. Shri Abdul Sami V/s. Smt. Neelu Dhandhiya 1 S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO. 2743/2009. Shri Abdul Sami V/s. Smt. Neelu Dhandhiya Date of Order: 20th May, 2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr. J.K. Yogi, for the appellant. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the impugned order. It is not in dispute that the appellant did not file any counter site plan to show what was the property in the possession of the appellant, disputing the site plan filed by the plaintiff respondent. Learned court below has only directed, while allowing the application for the grant of temporary injunction, that the appellant is restrained from interfering in the possession of the plaintiff respondent S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO. 2743/2009. Shri Abdul Sami V/s. Smt. Neelu Dhandhiya 2 in the property other than the one shown in red colour which alone was show to be in the possession of the defendant appellant and the remaining 4/5th in the possession of the respondent plaintiff. The temporary injunction is only in respect of the portion (4/5th ) in possession of the plaintiff. In the facts and circumstances, I find no good ground to interfere with the impugned order. The appeal is accordingly dismissed summarily. The stay application also stands dismissed. (Dalip Singh),J. Tanwar/- Jr.P.A.