1/2 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3360/2008 (Smt.Lad Kanwar & Anr. vs. ADJ (FT) Chittorgarh & anr.) DATE OF ORDER : 20/7/2009 HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.Jagat Tatia, for the petitioners. Mr.M.R.Singhvi, for the respondent. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 5/3/2008, whereby, the learned trial court rejected the review petition filed by the plaintiff against the order dated 15/7/2006, whereby, the learned trial court held that dissolution deed dated 18/1/1994 did not require any registration or payment of court fee ad valorem and the dissolution deed in question on the stamp duty of Rs.50/- was sufficiently stamped and, therefore, was admissible in evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not point out any provision of law where under said dissolution deed is required to be registered with the Sub-Registrar under the provisions of Transfer of Property Act or is required to be affixed with the stamp duty on the ad valorem basis. Learned counsel for the respondents pointed out that this Court while deciding the earlier writ petition on 21/3/2006 filed by the petitioner namely S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5236/05 had granted indulgence to the present petitioner to lead entire evidence without 2/2 seeking any adjournment on one single day on 17/4/2006 subject to payment of cost of Rs.2200/- to the defendant respondent. However, instead of leading evidence on one single day the plaintiff is seeking to delay the proceedings on one pretext or the other and on 17/4/2006 itself the present petitioner filed the application that dissolution deed was not sufficiently stamped or registered and since then this litigation is pending by filing review petition and the present writ petition, which itself is pending in this Court since 2008. It appears that the plaintiff is merely trying to delay the trial for one reason or the other without any valid reason. After perusing the reasons given by the learned trial court in the impugned order, this Court is of the considered opinion that this writ petition has not force and has been filed in this Court to delay the trial unnecessarily. The writ petition being devoid of merit is accordingly dismissed. (DR.VINEET KOTHARI), J. item no.2 baweja/-