SSNGLEBENCHi c ^' vad IN THB HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISOARH WritPetition No./l&'?2- of 2005 PETITIONER: ^ ^it" RESPONDENTS: - Versus - ^l, • ^4-^' ..or^^ ^^/ ^^M^ x^°y ^^' ^'^' ..•••" /3. ^16<7 ^ /<. ^eA x o^ ^- Indian Broiler Fann, A partaership finn registered under ttie Indiaa PartnershipAct, Through its Executi.ve Director Aajum Alvt, S/o Late Dr. Iqbal Alvi.Aged about 42 years, R/o Aaupam Nagar, Rajnaadgaon, Chhattisgarh. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretaiy, DepartmentofUrhaa , Developinent aud Admioistration, D.K.S. Bhawau, Mantealaya, Raipur, Chliattisgarh. The Director, DepartmeD.tof Urbaa Developiaent arid Admioistration, State of Chliattisgarh, Raipur, Chliattisgarh. Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, Through its Conuiu.ssioner, BUaspur, District: Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. The Coimnissioner, Muaicipal Corporation, Bilaspur, District; BUaspur, Cbhattisgarh. The Health Officer, Municipal Corporation, BUaspur, District: Bilaspyr,ChItattisgarh. 267; WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCB OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRIT8. DIRECTIONS ETC., IN THB NATURB OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI AItD/OR ANY OTHBR SUITABLB WRIT OF LIKE NATURE > The petitioner, above named, niost respectflitly begs to subniit as under: - HIQHCOURT OP eHMATTISQARMAT HLASMjR SINBM-EBENCI-t : HCWI'a.EMR.SAriSUtGAGIWteTRt.A PeUUoner Respondents WRITPETmON N0A672 OF 20 1 Indian BroiterT;aiia versus StaterfehtiatU^iatoandotheR Mr. Rt^em^St'invastava ai'id^fc. IndrasemSahu, cttunsel forthepefitioner. Mr. A.S.Kachhawaha, Govemment Advoeate (or responctenls No.1and2. Mrs. Hamida Siddte|t»,couns»tfor respondents NoAto 5. (PassedonS oy^fcvember,200® The peffitoner is »partneratfilp flnn eny®edin Vtw busmess of poultiy farmmg and selNng chidCTn ^Elrossed antf undressec^. The peWoner was granted licenea on 20-4-2(X?S ^nnexure P-^ fer a periodof one ^artill 31-S-MOStetie ptBpesa of storing/selling chictens, esus ate. Diwmg suteistenee tf the said. licence, the Ihsence of the peBBoner was suspenctod by order ^rted 6-9- 2005 (Annexura P-^ on ftie basis of certain eomplatats maie by the residents o( the adj»»rrttoeality. The ^UUoner hEB impugned e suspension orderdated&'&-2(X)5(AnnexureP-5)tnthtspetitien. of flie impugn«tonteTdatecl&5-2005(AnRffaireP-8) ttUttie nextdata ofheartns. ByvirtueofthestayorderdatKt 1 ii!J± Court, th&pefifiGawhsa-eai»8«wied;tebuAes»»n4t'»ste^®U»ot®i8 licene»dsrtal 2M^SN}& ^nnfficure P-^ flRmtet ly »i&Muric^sfr Cwpora8QnjBto8ptB.Th»flei'ioA<rfttienMn^lia^con»to^»mid'on S06. Thtt'peWanw has wortrad on fc®li^me ewen b^OTtEtAw period ^ th»Ucenea on tw strengtti ot ttw ©BdwAEled. ^ passad toytftis©o^;ta 1 tnftuctuous. 3. Thewitt petUon 1& beeomftintruetaeus. No-orctefiastocosts. ^tmh^ vs twaHg^ Sd/- . _ SatishK.Ag""10"1 Judge