1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.52 OF 2009 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.52 OF 2009 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.52 OF 2009 IN IN IN REVIEW PETITION NO.18 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION NO.18 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION NO.18 OF 2008 IN IN IN A.O. NO.203 OF 2002 A.O. NO.203 OF 2002 A.O. NO.203 OF 2002 Narayan Kalyan Ugar .. Appellant vs. Mukund Kalyan Ugar & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.Narayan Kalyan Ugar in person Mr.A.G.Damale for the respondents CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE: 6TH FEBRUARY, 2009 DATE: 6TH FEBRUARY, 2009 DATE: 6TH FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C. 1. This is an L.P.A. filed by the appellant in person against the order dated 11.11.2008 in Review Petition No.18 of 2008 which was filed by the appellant as he was not satisfied with the decision of the High Court in A.O. NO.203 of 2002 which was disposed of by order dated 16.03.2005. 2. In view of section 100 A r/w section 10 of the 2 Civil Procedure Code, this court will not be able to entertain L.P.A. from an original or appellate decree or order decided by the single Judge of the High Court, as no further appeal would lie from the Judgment and decree of such single Judge. In view of this, the L.P.A. is dismissed with liberty to the appellant to take recourse to the remedy available to him under the law. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.) (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.) (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.)