IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48919 of 2008 BIJENDRA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 03.12.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected on the previous occasion considering that the petitioner was the father of the husband of the deceased in a Police case under Section 304B/34 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel submits that it was an error of record. The petitioner was in fact the cousin father-in-law of the deceased with generalized allegations when charge sheet was not submitted against him and the investigation remained pending. Charge sheeted accused have been acquitted in the trial. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Chapra in Chapra Muffasil P.S. case No. 174 of 2004, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)