IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.p. g No. §§§§0F 2008 LC] av Petitioner / India Church Council Disciples of Christ, a registered Society bearing registration no. 286 through its Executive Secretary Rev. N.L. Soni, aged about 55 years, R/o Civil Lines, Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus Respondents /1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Deptt. of Urban Administration and Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. ‘ Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner, having oftice at Town Hall, Bilaspur (C.G.) Estate Officer, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur (C.G.) Tehsildar, .Bilaspur, Tehsil and Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) /, 4. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 224 2/27 y“ OF THE \g. CONSTITUTION OF INDIA , ,w..._—»_._-~J_.. SB : Hon’ble Shri‘Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 22I02I201 1 petitioner. Shri Alok Bakshi, counsel for the and 4. Shri Satish Gupta, Government Advocate for Respondents No.1 Ms. Tripti Dewangan, counsel fot the Respondents No. 2 and 3. :ure of relief sought in the petition, Taking into consideration the na this matter is being disposed off finally. s that the petitioner owns certain The assertion of the petitioner lands bearing Khasra No. 822/2 (renumbered as 822/23) situated in Tarbahar, Juna Bilaspur, Patwari Halka No.110(A). According to the Development Authority issued a tion/taking over of certain lands for No.2. ln the said notification ,ra No.822/2 has already been elopment Authority was dissolved 'ed to the Municipal Corporation, some part of the land of the i has been taken over and used for application (Annexure P-3) was )ner to the Chief Executive Officer nent Authority stating that as their f,road, the petitioner is entitled to )r allotment of development land in moved an application before the ’/O8 in response to which the petitioner, the then Existing Bilaspur Notification in the year 1985 for acquisi construction of proposed Ring Road (Annexure P/1), the aforesaid Kh'as included. Later on, the Bilaspur Dev and assets and liability was transfer Bilaspur. According to the petitioner petitioner comprising Khasra No.822/31 construction of Ring Road No.2. Ar made by the office bearer of the petitii of the then Existing Bilaspur Developr land has been used for construction c proper and appropriate compensation t lieu of compensation. The petitioner Public information Officer on 28/0‘ "4. ‘ r4“” , a .a was” ‘MWmww.,Nw,t,,w-..w,. . w.“ a... .. tm~_‘..__._..-v... 27 mmfrr‘g‘am %a‘311?‘ma11%$1 respondent/Municipal Corporation has issued a Ietter on 22/08/08 (Annexufe P-5) stating that on the application, a case has been initiated and the same'ig‘pending for want of availability of necessary documents. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for more than two years, the matter has remained pendi with Corporation‘without any decision on the representation made byt e petitioner. In these circumstances, without menting on the merits of the case of the petitioner, it would be prope to dispose of the matter with a direction to the respondent/Corporati n to take final decision on petitioner‘s representation. Accordingly, respondent No.2 is directed to take appropriate decision in accord nce with law on petitioner’s representation on his claim of compensat on. It is made clear that this Court h s not decided any of the issues pendihg before the Corporation in the tter of representation made by the petitioner. The Corporation shall do ell to take appropriate decision on petitioner’s claim, within a reasonable period, not later than six months from the date of receipt of copy of this or er. With the aforesaid observations, t e petition is finally disposed off. Laxmi Manindra Mohan Shrivastava \ Judge W‘s! iii??? :4-. ;jf”" .. n m a