IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2008 / 21ST ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 28311 of 2008(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- V.K.SAINABA, W/O.M.A.SHERIF, MULLAPPILLY HOUSE, P.O.KECHERY, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CHOONDAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, CHOONDAL, THRISSUR. 2. SECRETARY, CHOONDAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THRISSUR. 3. MUSTHAFA, S/O.ALI.V, THAYAKKULAM HOUSE, KAIPARAMBU VILLAGE, DESOM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.NIREESH MATHEW FOR R3 SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: W.P.C.NO. 28311/2008. -------------------------------------------------------------------- EXT.P1 REPRESENTATION DT. 27-8-2008. EXT.P2 DO. DT. 10-9-2008. EXT.P3 COMMUNICATION DT. 26-9-2008. [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE. S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 28311 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 13th October, 2008. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by alleged illegal constructions made by the 3rd respondent in the property adjacent to that of the petitioner, which causes inconvenience to the petitioner. Learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submits that taking note of the complaint of the petitioner, a stop memo has been issued to the 3rd respondent. However, no further proceedings have been initiated in view of the pendency of the writ petition, is the submission made. 2. I have heard counsel for the petitioner, counsel for respondents 1 and 2 and counsel for the 3rd respondent. 3. I am of opinion that having issued a stop memo, respondents 1 and 2 have to pass final orders in the matter expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions: The 1st respondent shall pass final orders pursuant to the stop memo stated to have been issued to the 3rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the 3rd respondent. Till final orders are passed, the 3rd respondent shall not make any further constructions in the property. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/