IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1269 of 2010 DEEPAK PODDAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 16.11.2010 Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioner is accused of a case instituted under sections 384 and 302 IPC. As per the allegation in the FIR, he along with other accuseds committed murder of the father of the informant on his refusal to pay Rangdari(ransom amount). Counsel for the petitioner states that he has been declared juvenile and is in custody/remand home since 18.12.2008. Learned appellate court considered his prayer for bail and refused the same on the ground stated in paragraph 6 of the order. Considering the gravity of the offence and the manner in which it was committed as also the fact that petitioner seems to be involved in criminal cases, as would be evident from paragraph 6 of the aforesaid order, this Court is not inclined to enlarge him on bail. Prayer is accordingly refused. However, the petitioner shall have liberty to renew his prayer for bail in the court below itself if the entire prosecution witnesses are not examined within four months from the date of receipt/communication of this order in the court below. In that event, the trial court shall consider his 2 claim and disposed of the same in accordance with law uninfluenced by the present order. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )