1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.642 of 2009 (Haribhau s/o Dhondiba Manjramkar and others vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. G.G.Suryawanshi, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. D.R.Korde, APP for respondent State. Mr. P.P.Chavan, Adv., for respondent no.2. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 15/9/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard learned Counsel for the original accused and learned Counsel for the complainant. 2. In the controversy of appointment in the school by the accused/applicants, series of prosecutions are launched. It is clarified that the Government has withdrawn the recognition to the school since April, 2003. There is already a prosecution vide 2 Crime No.155/2002 for an offense under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420 read with Section 34 of IPC against the present accused persons. The separate prosecution in RCC No.919/2008 by the complainant Ramesh naturally, if it arises from the same incident, needs to be tagged with Crime No. 155/2002. It cannot be said that there is again initiation of separate proceedings by FIR No. 3/2009, arising out of RCC No. 919/2008. With the above observations, the Criminal Application (No. 642/2009) disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/642-09crapl