IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2008 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 8575 of 2008(U) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SMT.C.S.BINDU, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (ENGLISH) ABRAHAM MEMORIAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL THIRUMALA ,TRIVANDRUM, RESIDING AT VALLAYYAN NINNAVILA VEEDU, MULLOOR PO, VIZHINJAM TRIVANDRUM 695 521. BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM 695001. 2. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER O/O. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER TRIVANDRUM. 3. DIRECTOR OF POUBLIC INSTRUCITONS TRIVANDRUM. 4. ABRAHAM MEMORIAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THIRUMALA, TRIVANDRUM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. 5. C.S. SHAMMI, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (ENGLISH) ABRAHAM MEMORIAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL 6. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION TRIVANDRUM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 8575 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 11th April, 2008. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by the re-arrangement of her appointment as High School Assistant (Hindi) from 2004 allegedly in order to give undue and unjust advantage to the 5th respondent in the matter of seniority, who is junior to the petitioner. The petitioner has filed Ext. P1 revision petition before the Government in this matter. She now seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on the same expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P1 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as respondents 4 and 5. (Although the writ petition filed by the 5th respondent was posted along with this writ petition, there is no representation in that case today). The petitioner shall forward a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition to the 1st respondent for compliance. S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/