IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1228 (SS) of 2011 Km. Puja D/o Sri Ram Pal …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate present for the petitioner Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned standing counsel present for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned standing counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. The petitioner is a candidate for the post of Assistant Teacher (L.T. Grade) (Arts), however, her candidature has not been considered. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner did her intermediate with “Drawing and Design” and not with “Drawing and Painting”. This aspect has already been decided by this Court whereby the writ petitions were allowed. The present writ petition being similar in nature is being decided in terms of Km. Renu Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others (Writ Petition No. 900 of 2011) decided on 01.09.2011. Therefore, this writ petition is also being decided on the same terms as writ petition no. 900 of 2011. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) Dated: 16.09.2011 VKG