MIGH $CIUFH' CW CHHATT!S$ARH: HH..A3PUR $ingle E3ench: Han’bie $hri {imp Ramamb Daghmukh, J. MKGL Ne. ‘m6 0f 2mm Miswiiamms aweai imam $eclion W3 0f the Momr Vlahicia Act, ww Present: Shri SC. Verma, courisel for the appellant. OW“. limitima (Passed on 08.02.2008) Heard on admission. (2) By an order dated 2S109/2GO7 passed by the Motor Accideni5 Claims Tribunal (FTC), Raipur (henceforth éhe IMACT’i in claims case No.?5;'2006 in an injury casex the MACT has awarded Rs‘EXODGI— as compensation. Aggrieved, five appeiiant/ciaimani has preierrecl this appeal far enhancement of compensation. (3) Learned counsel for the appellant did noi point cut any ground for admission of this appeal No daoumentaiy evidence was adduced before the Tribunal for provmg that the slaimani had suffered any permanent disability or even a grievoua injury in the accident. No medical evidence wae adduced. Therefore: compensation awarded by the MAGT cannot be faulted with. {4) Accordingly) the appeal being devoid of merit is dismissed at ine stage of admission ' Sdl— Judge 1 Priya Diiip Raosaheb Deshmukh Appeiiam : Tukaram Tayak 8/0 Khorbahara Ram Ciaiman‘t Tarakx aged abwt 38 years), Rio Vinage Beitukari: Thana Rajim, Tahsi! Rajim‘ Districi Raipur (CG) Varsug Respondents : ’3. Prashamt Kumar Aarawai 8m Praharad Non-cfaimamt Kumar Agrawal OcEupatiom Mamt& Van Ommer & Dn‘ver R/c; Kumaharpara, Nayapara, Distt. Raipur<CG) 2. The New lndia lmsurance Campany Lirmted, Bramch Office N62, RDA. Building Raipur} Through: Divisional Manager; Divisional Office: Kuieheiy Chowk, Jail Road} Raipur (CG)