1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.34 of 2007 INDRAMANI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 07- 26.08.2008 Heard Mr. Chittaranjan Sinha for the petitioner, and Mr. Nawal Kishore Singh, learned Standing Counsel No.6 for opposite party nos.1 to 8. This application has been filed by the widow of the petitioner of C.W.J.C. No.4796 of 2003 and C.W.J.C. No.5474 of 2003 (Tripurari Sharan Singh Vs. The State of Bihar and others), for modification of the judgment dated 12.1.2006, whereby the writ petitions were dismissed. The present petitioner in the capacity of the widow of the late employee preferred L.P.A. No.182 of 2006 (Indramani Devi Vs. The State of Bihar & others), which was dismissed by the following order dated 9.1.2007: “After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal enabling the appellant to file review application. This application is dismissed as withdrawn.” Sd/- Narayan Roy, J. Sd/- Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J. Hence this review application. 2. While pressing this application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 2 this Court has erroneously interpreted the provisions of rule 43(b) of the Bihar Pension Rules. In my view, the contention falls beyond the limited scope of review jurisdiction. The scope and sweep of the review jurisdiction is well-known. In that view of the matter, the contention advanced on behalf of the petitioner cannot be entertained in review jurisdiction. 3. This review application is accordingly rejected. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/