IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38360 of 2010 RAM SAGAR MAHTON S/O LATE TETAR MAHTON, R/O VILLAGE CHANDPURA, P.S. NEEMCHANDPURA, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI ……………… Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………. Opposite Party ----------- 2. 08.03.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 17.8.2010 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-I, Begusarai in S.T. No. 206/2009, by which an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. has been allowed for examination of two witnesses. The petitioner is aggrieved on account of the fact that these witnesses were not named in the First Information Report nor were they mentioned in the charge sheet despite which such an application was allowed. Since the Trial Court is fully competent to consider as to whether the examination of the witnesses was essential for the just decision of the case, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )