IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No. 13260 of 1994 Date of decision:- 04.08.2011 Punjab State Electricity Board ....Petitioner Vs. Shri Shakti Lal Sharma and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present:- Mr. Ankit Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advocate, with Ms. Himanchali Kaushik, Advocate, for respondent No.1. ***** A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing the award dated 22.12.1993 (Annexure P-1), whereby services of workman-Shakti Lal-respondent No.1 were ordered to be regularised with all consequential benefits. Respondent No.1-workman was appointed as lineman on 06.03.1978. By now, he must have retired. Therefore, no cause of action survives in this petition. Dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) 4th of August, 2011 JUDGE ajp