WP 5929 of 10 1 SSK/11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5929 OF 2010 Yeshwant Bhikal Ebaad ....Petitioner Versus Shri Laxman Rama Hadal & Ors. ...Respondents Ms. Manjiri Parasnis, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. N. Bhosale, AGP for Respondent Nos.3 to 6. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 9th AUGUST, 2010. P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. In an election held in the year 2006, the Petitioner was elected to the post of member of Gram Panchayat Village-Talasari. The Respondent No.1 filed a complaint alleging that the Petitioner is disqualified under section 14(j-1) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. It is specifically contended that the Petitioner was already having two children and has begotten two more children after the cut-off date, one on 20th September, 2002 and another on 10th November, 2006. Both the lower authorities after giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned found that both children of the Petitioner were born after the cut-off date. I have perused the birth certificates of 3rd and 4th child of the Petitioner annexed at pages 35 and 36. The said certificates are verified from the original record and found to be correct. Both the lower authorities have rightly disqualified the Petitioner. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference in the impugned order. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (R. V. MORE, J.)