1 cri-wp-1394-11 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1394 OF 2011 Shri Sandip Pandurang Kadam .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The State of Maharashta and ors. .. Respondents Mr. Sachin B. Thorat for petitioner. Ms. M. H. Mhatre, APP for State. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D.SALVI, JJ. July 05, 2011. P.C. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. He prays for being discharged from Sessions Case No. 156 of 2011. The appropriate remedy for the petitioner at this stage is to apply for being discharged in Sessions Case No. 156 of 2011 and when such a efficacious remedy is available, there is no ground made out to 2 cri-wp-1394-11 entertain this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition is, therefore, rejected with liberty to apply for discharge, if so advised. (U.D.SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)