IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.35573-M of 2010 Date of Decision:23.12.2010 Manmohan Narang .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Puneet Singla, Advocate for the petitioners. Mrs. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for issuance of direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to take appropriate action against respondents No.4 and 5, who are at large inspite of the fact that the 2 FIRs have been registered against respondent No.4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from ASI Malkinder Singh states that all the accused including respondent No.4 have since been arrested. In view of the said statement, learned counsel for the petitioner states the present petition may be dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 23.12.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE