IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6763 of 2010 KAPIL DEO SAHNI SON OF LATE SURAT SAHANI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – NAYA GADHNA, POLICE STATION BACHCHWARA, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI, PRESENTLY RESIDING IN MOHALLA – NAYA GANGA SAGAR ( NEAR SARVODAYA HIGH SCHOOL) POLICE STATION – LAHERIA SARAI, DISTRICT – DARBHANGA. Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD. THROUGH THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, SONE BHAWAN, BEER CHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA -1. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR STATE FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD. SONE BHAWAN, BEER CHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA -1. 3. THE CHIEF OF FINANCE, BIHAR STATE FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD.SONE BHAWAN, BEER CHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA -1. 4. BOARD OF TRUSTEE THROUGH ITS SECRETARY BIHAR STATE FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD. SONE BHAWAN BEER CHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA -1. 5. THE DISTRICT MANAGER, BIHAR STATE FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD. DARBHANGA, DISTRICT DARBHANGA. 6. THE DISTRICT MANAGER, BIHAR STATE FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD. MADHUBANI, DISTRICT MADHUBANI. 7. THE DISTRICT MANAGER BIHAR STATE FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD. MUZUFFARPUR , DISTRICT MUZUFFARPUR. 8. THE DISTRICT MANAGER, BIHAR STATE FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD. BHOJPUR (ARRAH) DISTRICT BHOJPUR. 9. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, NIDHI BHAWAN, R-BLOCK ROAD NO. 6, PATNA. 10. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES, PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, SUB-REGIONAL OFFICE, MUZUFFARPUR, DISTRICT – MUZUFFARPUR. ----------- 02. 20.04.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and Mr. R.S. Pradhan, Senior Advocate appears on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 10. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of August 2008 as Assistant from the office of respondent – Corporation, petitioner has not been paid his full provident fund 2 dues. It is further submitted that petitioner is entitled to receive a sum of Rs. 8,75,250/- however, out of the aforesaid amount petitioner has been paid only a sum of Rs. 3,42,492/- as per cheque no. 709321 dated 28.05.2009. It is further submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance petitioner represented before the Chief of Finance of the respondent – Corporation vide Annexure-2 with all supporting documents. Mr. R.S. Pradhan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Corporation submits that the claim of the petitioner needs to be verified. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file separate representations before the respondent nos. 2 and 9 stating his grievance with regard to payment of the provident fund dues. In such view of the matter, in case such representations stating details of unpaid claims are filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondents shall 3 consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. As requested by the petitioner, one chance is allowed for oral hearing in order to explain his grievance before the respondent- Corporation, as raised in the representation, for which he will be given due notice. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)