e^-z IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS •^" W. P.( S l No."70 9 1 /2009 ^ : 1. Rajendra Prasad Markam, S/o Nirmal Singh Markam, aged about 47 years, Occupation- Head Master Government Middle School, Kamarid, Block Baloda, Distt. Janjgir (Champa) (C.G.) 2. Somaru Ram Manhar, S/o Jageshwar Prasad Manhar, aged about 44 years, Occupation- Upper Division Teacher, Goverriraent Middle School, Rainpur, Block Baloda, Distt. Janjgir (Champa) (C.G.). f 3. Santosh Kumar Kurre, S/o Darash Ram Kurre, aged about 41 years, Occupation- Upper Division Teacher Govemment Middle School, Sivani, Block Baloda, Distt. Janjgir, (Champa) (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^<o :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) / ' 2. The District Education Officer, District Janjgir (Champa) (C.G.) 3. The Block Education Officer, Block Baloda, District Janjgir (Champa) (C.G.). 4. The Treasury Account and Pension, District Janjgir (Champa) (C.G.). WRIT PETITION^ UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIQHCOURT OF CHHATTISQ. ^.s'ass ,@3 •iiiiu.f^iSiT'' WRITPeTiTiONlSiNO. 1 Ut' ~£W PETITiONEF ^?*^?^^'>^.<fl4w'<"( ^^y-lfhfy-^I-V^ ^j^v^^.f.n^W^ ^ ^%^^.^^. V»^ i'^.etsCHUiei y'ssa.Ssd^S ^iis.i S\«6.ji^ 'ui ^i.iidis Versus -State of Chhattisgarh & Othei a-»4 S."l?'?4''*S*F* ! 1 ='1 ^l'•i!?' i^l *'^':t'tn-i<l<L 'l'3'"SSk f*.S •fl^.ni ^*'<»,snc»-^4?•iA?»^.»<. rf^..'? Slim^i/qi iV^fjl £°''Si,3uCJlUOuSf f^.fla'Ci^ &^te. O? IHS U.OHS'OIUiiCH O? iHCtlSS • Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. u. Present:- Shri Shakti Raj Sinha, cpunsei for the petjtioners. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawver for the Stste, s. ''w'rv^.swS (Passed on fhis S'" day of DecemBer, 2809) With the consenf of learned counsel appearing for the parties, is heard finaiiv. Atth the very' outset, learned counsel appearing forthe petitioners submlts that this petition is squarejy covered by the decisions' of this Court passed in Vy.P..{Si No.STS of 2007 (Dhani Ram Banjare and Others v. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and othsr connscted matters S W.P. i'S) No.4130 of 2005 {Gopesh Kumar Verma v. The State Govt. of Chhattisaarh and anotftsr) and ot'ner connected matters. Learned counsel prays that siffiiiar relief may be granted in case of the prssent peiitioner aiso. . At this juncture, tearned counsel appearing fbr the State submits that in the event the oetitioners submit a dstaiied representation the same shali be consldersd and decided, in accordance with iaw and in view of the decislons of this Court rendered In Dhan' Ram Banjare (suDra) S Gopesh Kumar Verma (supra), subject to verification of facts. in view of foregoing, aecording to the learned counsei appeacing Tor the petitioners nothing survives m this peti adjudication. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge