IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.13124 of 2011 Date of decision: 26.07.2011 Naresh Kumar ....Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Ms. Naiya Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that respondent No.2 is not taking any action on complaint (Annexure P-4) moved by the petitioner on 22.6.2011, therefore, respondent No.2 be directed to take decision on complaint (Annexure P-4). Without expressing any opinion on the merit and maintainability of the complaint, respondent No.2 is directed to take decision on the complaint (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Alok Singh) Judge July 26, 2011 R.S.