%ii?\^ 'C \^- '.: •; ^ -•'- < (F'f IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHHASTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.PJ_7~"_ 1NQ. ^T-S /2010 PETITIONER ^ ^-^ _ .'\'i--'^-y"~ ...•• ^^w"^ •NO.-^~..'A<9..--"" ':.-"b\v 3'fr ^^;"" ^••••'^''^\\^.:'" ^.^^>" Mithilesh & Co. Through Proprietor, Santosh Agarwal, aged about 51 years, S/o. Shri S.K. Agrawal, 304/3 Shyam Vatika, Choubey Colony, Raipur, Tehsil and District Raipur Chhattisgarh RESPONDENT VERSUS 1. Chief Corainissioner, Central Zone, Nagpur Commissioner, Central Excise (Appeals), Aurangabad (Maharashtra) Commissioner, Central Excise and Service Tax, Central Excise and Service Tax Bhawan, Tikrapara, Raipur, Tehsil and District, Raipur Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zon.al Bench, Muinbai WRlTPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 ^,^y.i ^s:^/ s^^^ '<A! HIGH COURT OF CHHA'mSGARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETITION (T) No. 1475 of2010 PETmONER RESPONDENTS Mrthilesh & Co. VERSUS Chief Commissioner, Central Zone, Nagpur & Qthers. WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFI 'NDIA ;; ' ; ::-i; ; SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. As'nihotri. J. tt Present: Shri Rahul Tamaskar, Advocate fbr the petitioaier, i OKDER(OiRAL) (Passed on 16 day of June, 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioiier, on mstructions, seeks pennission ofthis Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a better petition. 2. It is ordered accordingly. 3. Consequently, Ifae writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty, ifso advised. \ Sdi- 1 SatishK.Agnihotri 1 Judge Aimt