... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1293 OF 2002 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1293 OF 2002 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1293 OF 2002 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri A.S.Shitole, A.P.P for the Applicant. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 15, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 15, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 15, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned A.P.P for the State in support of prayer for grant of leave. The Respondents have been acquitted of the offences under section 7(i) read with section 2(ia)(a) and section 7(v) read with rule 37 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1955 punishable under section 16 and 17 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. The learned Trial Judge has considered the oral and documentary evidence on record. The learned Trial Judge found that there was no compliance of requirement of section 13 (2) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. No case is made out for grant of leave. Appeal is dismissed. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE