IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28055 of 2011 Umesh Singh, son of Late Jagdish Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 4. 15.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution case is that suddenly the Informant woke up and saw some miscreants fleeing away from her house. In the torch light she identified the petitioner with pistol running away along with some unknown persons. The case was instituted in the year 2004 and the petitioner is named in the First Information Report despite which he chose to surrender only on 8.12.2010. This Court is informed that seven witnesses have already been examined during trial. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The Trial Court (A.D.J., F.T.C.-III, Madhepura) is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it within a period of six months for which reason he is directed to send a list of the witnesses fixing specific dates for production of the witnesses along with a copy of this order in connection with Sessions Trial No. 56 of 2011, arising out of Chausa P.S. 2 Case No. 59 of 2004 to the Superintendent of Police, Madhepura, and the Superintendent of Police, Madhepura, is directed to ensure production of the witnesses on the date so fixed by the Trial Court so that there is no further delay in trial. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)