1 wp-1685-2000.doc srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1685 OF 2000 Fakir Mohd. Suleman Kasab ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & anr. ...Respondents Mr.Uday Warunjikar for petitioner. Dr.F.R.Shaikh, APP for State. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D.SALVI, JJ. July 13, 2011. P.C. 1. In view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of State of Karnataka Vs. Parmjit Singh [(2006) 4 SCC 49], the challenge to the Constitutional validity of Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 does not survive. 2. Hence the petition is disposed as infructuous and it is clarified that 2 wp-1685-2000.doc the petitioner may challenge the order dated 10/11/2000 before the appropriate forum as may be permissible in law. (U.D.SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)