1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application [APPLN] No. 2019 of 2010 (Purushottam Narayan Bhange Vs. State of Maharashtra and another) with Criminal Application [APPLN] No. 2029 of 2010 (Purushottam Narayan Bhange Vs. State of Maharashtra and another) with Criminal Application [APPLN] No. 2030 of 2010 (Purushottam Narayan Bhange Vs. State of Maharashtra and another) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Ms. P. D. Rane, Advocate for the applicant Mr. N. R. Rode, APP for the State/non-applicant no. 1 Mr. N.S. Khandewale, Advocate for the non-applicant no. 2 CORAM : M.N. GILANI, J. DATE : 29 th JUNE, 2011. Common Order Heard. The applicant in all these applications has assailed the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Misc. Cri. Application Nos. 2179/2010, 2160/2010 and 2161/2010, whereby the non-applicants viz. Vijaykumar Shamkant Shinde, Rajendra Bhaskarrao Ninawe and Satish Madhukarrao Salunke were granted anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for non-applicant no. 2, on instructions states that charge-sheet in this matter has been filed and thereafter the non-applicant, who has been charge-sheeted, applied for regular bail and has been released on his furnishing fresh bail bonds. He has further clarified that no charge-sheet has 2 been submitted in respect of Rajendra Ninawe and Satish Salunke. In that light of the matter, all these applications filed under Section 439(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the non-applicants become infructuous. Applications are disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE *Sdw