IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. VATAP No. 76 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 6, 2009 M/s Bhagwati Steel Industries …Appellant Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA Present: Mr. Kashmiri Lal Goyal, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Piyush Kant Jain, Addl. AG, Punjab, for the respondents. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. After arguing for some time and production of record, learned counsel for the appellant does not wish to press the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed being not pressed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (H.S. BHALLA) May 6, 2009 JUDGE Pkapoor