IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 19279 of 2004 Between: AWC Mother Committee, Bellamkondavaripalem Village, Tallur Mandal, Prakasam District rep.by its President K.Renuka ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Child Development Project Officer, Tallur, Prakasam District 2 The Project Director, Women Development & Child Welfare Department, Ongole, Prakasam District 3 The Joint Collector/ Chairman, District Purchase Committee, Ongole, Prakasam District 4 I. Varamma W/o. Venkateswarlu R/o. Tallur, Prakasam District (R4 is impleaded as per court order dt. 7-3-2005 in WPMP 32061 of 2004) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring action of the 1st respondent in issuing the proceedings Lr.No.24/A/04, dated 12-10- 2004 preventing the petitioner from transportation of RTE & SNP food from ICDS Project godown, Tallur to Anganwadi Centers in pursuant to the order issued by the 3rd respondent vide proceedings No.144/A4/2004 dated 31-3-2004 is arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the 1st respondent not to obstruct the petitioner from transportation of RTE & SNP food from ICDS Project Godown, Tallur to Anganwadi Centers in terms of the orders No.144/A4/2004, dated 31-3-2004 issued by the 3rd respondent in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR WOMEN DEV. & CHILD WELFARE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO.19279 OF 2004 ORDER: Though the interlocutory matters are listed, Sri Balaji, learned Advocate, representing Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the writ petition itself has become infructuous in view of the lease contract is already over. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO,J) 21.06.2005. pln To 1 The Child Development Project Officer, Tallur, Prakasam District 2 The Project Director, Women Development & Child Welfare Department, Ongole, Prakasam District 3 The Joint Collector/ Chairman, District Purchase Committee, Ongole, Prakasam District 4 Two CCs to Government Pleader for Women Development and Child Welfare, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 5 2 CD copies.