IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30897 of 2009 KAMPANI MAHTO @ MANOJ MAHTO SON OF JAI NARAYAN MATHO, R/O VILLAGE UDA, P.S. UDA KISHUNGANJ, DISTT. MADHEPURA …. PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR … O.P ----------- 2. 28.8.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that there is direct allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. It appears from the facts of the case that the petitioner is the sole accused under which circumstances the learned Magistrate will take effective steps to get the police papers supplied to the petitioner so that the case is committed to the court of Sessions. After the case is committed, the court concerned will take effective steps to conclude the trial. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )