:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 34 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 34 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 34 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 35 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 35 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 35 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 36 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 36 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 36 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 37 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 37 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 37 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 38 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 38 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 38 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 40 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 40 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 40 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 41 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 41 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 41 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 42 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 42 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 42 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 44 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 44 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 44 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 56 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 56 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 56 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 57 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 57 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 57 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 58 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 58 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 58 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 59 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 59 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 59 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 60 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 60 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 60 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 61 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 61 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 61 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 62 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 62 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 62 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 63 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 63 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 63 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 64 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 64 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 64 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 65 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 65 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 65 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2006 :2: WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 67 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 67 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 67 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 68 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 68 OF 2006 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 68 OF 2006 IN IN IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 672 OF 1996 COMPANY PETITION NO. 672 OF 1996 COMPANY PETITION NO. 672 OF 1996 The Board of Trustees of the ..Applicants/ Port of Bombay ..Petitioners versus The Official Liquidator, High Court, Bombay of N.T.V. Multiwall Paper Bag Company Pvt. Ltd. (In Liquidation) ..Respondents Mr. U. J. Makhija i/b. M/s. Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe for the Applicants / Petitioners. Mr. S. Ramakantha, Dy. Official Liquidator present. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. DATE : 7TH AUGUST, 2008. DATE : 7TH AUGUST, 2008. DATE : 7TH AUGUST, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard. 2. These Company Applications are filed by the Applicants/ Petitioners, for leave to prosecute and continue the suits filed by the Applicants against N.T.V. Multiwall Paper Bag Company Pvt. Ltd. (In Liquidation) and others. Having heard the party, there is no reason why such leave to prosecute and :3: continue the suits should not be granted. However, the Applicants shall not be entitled to execute the Decrees but shall approach the Official Liquidator with claim petitions. However, if the applicant wants to proceed against other defendants in the suits, it is at liberty to proceed according to law and to recover the decretal amounts. Order accordingly. 3. Company Applications are disposed of. (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.)