1 wp7253-11 jpc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7253 OF 2011 Chandanmal Dalichand Jain and another .. Petitioners Versus Kantilal Dalichand Jain and another ... Respondents Mr. R. D. Dave a/w Mr. Anil Chauhan i/by N.N. Vaishnawa for the petitioners Mr. S. D. Rayrikar, AGP for respondent No.2 CORAM : R. Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 27th September, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Misc. Application No.49 of 2011 was filed in Suit No. 4117 of 2007 and the learned judge of the City Civil Court, Greater Bombay has passed an order dated 12th August, 2011, giving specific directions as to how the documents covered in the said miscellaneous application should be attended to. 3. There is clear direction that the Investigating Officer shall return those documents after the inspection is over. In my view, the 2 wp7253-11 arguments advanced by Mr. Dave, the learned counsel for the petitioners, that the impugned order is barred under section 195 read with section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be accepted. As on today, the documents which are ordered to be handed to the Investigating Officer are just lying on the Court record. Surely, if the police wants those documents for investigation, the police must get chance to do so. The impugned order adequately protects the interest of the parties for getting the documents before the Court as and when required in the Suit. In my view, there is no reason to interfere with the impugned order. 4. The petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. (R. Y. GANOO, J.)