IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44435 of 2008 SANJEEV KUMAR @ MANTU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05/ 20.05.2009 Heard Sri Parmod Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri Dasrath Mehta, APP for the State. The petitioner is in custody since 22.8.2008 in a case under Section 395 of the IPC and is not named in the FIR. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor pointed out that some of the witnesses have named the petitioner in their statement. The contention is that if the informant knew about the participation of the petitioner in the offence, the name of the petitioner ought to have been mentioned in the FIR. Regard being had to the above facts and contention, let petitioner Sanjeev Kumar @ Mantu be released from custody on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda in Silao (Rajgir) P.S. Case No. 370 of 2004. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)