IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1907 of 2009 Bhawesh Prasad Yadav S/O Bharith Prasad Yadav R/O Vill.- Kuntha, P.S.- Shambhuganj, Distt.- Banka-----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Anirudha Prasad Yadav S/O Adhik Yadav R/O Vill.- Kuntha, P.S.- Shambhuganj, Distt.- Banka 3. Neeraj Prasad Yadav S/O Anirudha Prasad Yadav R/O Vill.- Kuntha, P.S.- Shambhuganj, Distt.- Banka 4. Satya Narayan Prasad Yadav S/O Tinku Prasad Yadav R/O Vill.- Kuntha, P.S.- Shambhuganj, Distt.- Banka 5. Dinesh Prasad Yadav S/O Tinku Prasad Yadav R/O Vill.- Kuntha, P.S.- Shambhuganj, Distt.- Banka 6. Hari Yadav S/O Tinku Prasad Yadav R/O Vill.- Kuntha, P.S.- Shambhuganj, Distt.- Banka 7. Ajai Prasad Yadav S/O Satya Narayan Prasad Yadav R/O Vill.- Kuntha, P.S.- Shambhuganj, Distt.- Banka 8. Vijai Yadav S/O Satya Narayan Prasad Yadav R/O Vill.- Kuntha, P.S.- Shambhuganj, Distt.- Banka 9. Ganesh Prasad Yadav S/O Fekan Yadav R/O Vill.- Kuntha, P.S.- Shambhuganj, Distt.- Banka 10. Sanchoo Prasad Yadav S/O Brahamdeo Prasad Yadav R/O Vill.- Kuntha, P.S.- Shambhuganj, Distt.- Banka 11. Mofal Yadav S/O Brahamdeo Prasad Yadav R/O Vill.- Kuntha, P.S.- Shambhuganj, Distt.- Banka 12. Vijai Kr. Yadav S/O Brahamdeo Pd. Yadav R/O Vill.- Kuntha, P.S.- Shambhuganj, Distt.- Banka 13. Karmachari Prasad Yadav S/O Munnilal Yadav R/O Vill.- Kuntha, P.S.- Shambhuganj, Distt.- Banka 14. Manoj Yadav S/O Hari Pd. Yadav R/O Vill.- Kuntha, P.S.- Shambhuganj, Distt.- Banka---------------Opposite parties. ---------------------------------- 2 13.12.2011 The informant petitioner has preferred this revision application against the judgment and order dated 5.11.2009 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (FTC-I) in Sessions Trial No. 172/320 of 2000/2009 arising out of Shambhuganj P.S. Case No. 8 of 1997 by which the accused have been acquitted by giving them the benefit of doubt. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and going through the impugned order it appears that the view taken by learned trial court is also possible; I do not find 2 any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. RPS ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)