1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.5456 of 2009 (Smt. Ashadevi w/o Ravindrakumar Agrawal and others v. Smt. Shakuntalabai Vasantrao Tekade and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri S.R. Dalvi, Advocate for Petitioners. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : DECEMBER 16, 2009. Heard. The application under Section 24 of the CPC, which was filed before the learned Principal District Judge, Akola, itself was incomplete, as it did not disclose necessary ingredients. The learned Principal District Judge has given proper reasons for rejecting that application. The finding reached that Special Civil Suit No.89 of 2009 was filed only to delay the proceedings in Regular Darkhast No.7 of 2007, in the present facts, does not appear to be either incorrect or perverse. No case is made out warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is dismissed. JUDGE pdl.