IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28448 of 2010 SATENDRA KUMAR RAI @ SATENDRA KUMAR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02/ 05.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was lodged against unknown person stating that the driver had left the truck near the Godown of Food Corporation of India, Phulwariasarif in the evening of Saturday and had gone to his house whereafter the said truck was stolen. He further submits that in his subsequent statement, informant had stated that the driver had left the khalasi along with truck and hence the khalasi who is the petitioner of this case had been implicated. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the entire allegation is false and frivolous as petitioner was not left with the truck and he has got no hand in the alleged occurrence which was apparent from the fact that just after few days of the lodging of the case, he had himself come to the godown. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 29.05.2010. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as 2 well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. Let petitioner, namely Satendra Kumar Rai be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No.—277/10. Ranjan (S. N Hussain, J.)