In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh C.W.P. No. 11008 of 2006 Date of Decision: September 8, 2006 Sheetal Dass …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. PATWALIA PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Khandelwal, Advocate, for Mr. R.N. Lohan, Advocate, for the petitioner. JUDGMENT M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral) On 21.7.2006, we have directed the petitioner to place on record the seniority list of Head Constables showing that the petitioner is senior-most and was entitled to be considered under 35% quota belonging to seniority-cum-merit. On 8.8.2006, we were apprised that the petitioner had made a representation to the respondent authorities to supply him the seniority list aforementioned. Today again the learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the seniority list has not been furnished to him so far. In view of the above, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to respondent No. 4 to furnish the petitioner the seniority CWP No. 11008 of 2006 list within a period of four weeks from today. The petitioner shall be at liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action after placing the seniority list on record. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (P.S. PATWALIA) September 8, 2006 JUDGE Pkapoor 2