IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 5598 of 2008 Decided on: 29.09.2010 Dharam Singh Rana …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : None. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : In sequel to order dated 5.8.2010, the petitioner has been served. Neither the petitioner is present in person nor represented by any counsel. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, so also the pending application(s), if any. However, the liberty is reserved to revive the same as and when the appropriate application is moved. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge September 29, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?