1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 329 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 203 OF 2010 Abdullah @ Aroj Sayyed Mumtaz Sayyed Usman Mudessar Sattar ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ----- Mr.Anikket Vagal for Applicant Mr.S.A.Shaikh- APP for State ------ CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 16TH JUNE, 2010 P.C. 1. The Applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under sections 3 and 14 of the Foreigners Act and sentenced to suffer R.I. for five years. 2. The learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant has already undergone 2 years and six months sentence out of 3 years of the total sentence awarded by the Trial Court and, therefore, he should be released on bail. He also submitted that there is no evidence to show that the Applicant is 1 foreigner within the meaning of Foreigners Act, 1946. 3. I have perused the judgment and order of the Trial Court and notes of evidence annexed by the Applicant to the application. Taking into consideration the material on record, in my view, this is not a fit case for grant of bail. 4. Hearing of the appeal is expedited. Place the appeal on the final hearing board in the weeks commencing from 5th July, 2010. 4. Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE J.)