IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 238 of 1999 to CIVIL REVISION APPLICATIONNo 241 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ ========================================================= 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? ---------------------------------------------------------- BACHIBEN GOBARBHAI SAGAR Versus MANILAL AMULAKH NAYAK ---------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Civil Revision Application No. 238 of 1999 MR JV JAPEE for Petitioner No. 1 NOTICE SERVED BY DS for Respondent No. 1-2 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 1-2,4 MS ROOPAL R PATEL for Respondent No. 3 RULE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent No. 3 MR ASHISH H SHAH for Respondent No. 4 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ Date of decision: 21/09/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT Heard Mr. J.V. Japee, the ld. advocate appearing for the applicant-revisionists. 2. These four matters were placed for final hearing on 19th August 2002, however the same could not be taken up on that day. Mr. Japee submits that all these four matters are against the orders of interim compensation. In view of the amended provisions contained in Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, these revisions are not maintainable. Hence, they are rejected as having been not maintainable. Rule is discharged in all these matters with no order as to costs. 3. However, since the claim petitions are of the year 1996, the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal (Aux.), Sabarkantha is directed to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the writ from this Court or the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, whichever is earlier. rmr. [ K.A. Puj, J.]