1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 28th day of September, 2011 First Bail Application No. 311 of 2011 Criminal Side N.K.Yadav S/o Shri K.S.Yadav R/o Flat No. 21/B(Duplex) Bhagirathi Puram, THDC Colony Tehri (Uttarakhand) Permanent Address Village Post & P.S Gourjhamar, Tehsil Devaree District Sagar (M.P) …….Applicant (In Jail) Versus C.B.I., S.P.E., Dehradun ..…..Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. RC0072011A0002 Under Sections: 7/13(2) r/w 13 (1)(d) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Police Station: C.B.I., S.P.E. District: Dehradun Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Sandeep Tandon, Advocate, with Shri Ramji Srivastava, Advocate, present for the applicant. 2 Mr.Arvind Vashisth, Advocate, present for the C.B.I. Heard. Applicant– N.K.Yadav, who is in jail in connection with Case Crime No. RC0072011A0002, relating to offence punishable under section 7/13 (2) read with under section 13(1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Police Station C.B.I., S.P.E., Dehradun, has sought his release on bail. The applicant is in jail for last more than eight months. It is pleaded on behalf of the applicant that after the release of ` 29,41,366.56/- to the complainant for the work done by him, only outstanding dues were ` 2,46,017.54/-. It is further pleaded that it is hard to believe that for payment of said balance applicant would have demanded ` 4 lakh as bribe. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties, and after going through the papers on record, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail. The Bail Application is allowed. Let the 3 applicant- N.K.Yadav be released on bail on her executing personal bond, and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of court concerned. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt.28.09.2011 Nahid