^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BILAS fCHHATTISGARH^ WRIT PBDJION N0. '^28^ QF 2006' PETTTIONER £ ^\y RESPONDENT /'" •• . ^•-'^y ..••°'' .^y/r ^^•y ^•^..^ .-•' -•.y—^''" .** cy'<-^'t' /r.;:?^:>'' .^"y.7' ^y^/ "<<y /-^Shiv Kailash Singh, Son of Late Pancham Singh, aged about 50 years, Occupation Inspector of '"^' C.G. Police, at present posted as R.T.I. (Regional Transport Inspector),^^Rengar Pali Check Post, Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, / Through: The Secretary, Department of Home, D.K.S. Bhawan, Ra4>yr (C.G.). 2. The Director General of Police, ^ Police Heact Quarters, Raipur, (C.G.). 3. The Regionat Transport Officer, - Raigarh (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA ?;fete?^l^|^fcy^!^yl^.^^;?b:;^ XI-HC-22 T^ ''iHMt, 'S^ftWTS, T^dRiy -. ^ SII^I'^iI ft-li*l 3^V sb*11+'HI^I —j- .^.^^...SQM sn^i'swiiwgtro dufies. petitioner has alresdy made a| P/3) to ihe Director Genera! ofi underwent a surgery. regardir) difficuit for him to tead ihe tel been atiached i" which the "'t'l^^-i'fl~V^ 4 fe^ ^srfSOTsn^i S.S-20S6 Smt. Hsmida S.iddiqus, ^ounssi for the pstitioner. Shri Ashutosh Kachchwaha, Govt. Advocate for the State/ rsspondents. Heard both Shs counsei.l By this writ petffion, tj-ie • petltioner has questioned tegality and propriety othis transfer ord^r dated 8-2-2006 (Annexure-P/1) on the jroursd that on account of m^jor surgery hs is not abie to psrform his At the outset, iearned c|ounsei for the petitioner submitted that the representatlon daied 31-3-2006 (Annexure- Poiice mentioning tnat in trte year 2004 he stone In the gailbladder, thersfore,; it is im tn a naxaiite area, hsnce he bs posted anyv/hsrs sxcept ths naxaiiie ^raa. A certificat®datec! 5-4-2006 givsn by Dr, V-K. Khetrapa!, Surgical Sjpecialist, S.P, Govt.'Hospital, Bilaspur has doctor has menfioned that the petitionsr underwen! major exSenslve aBdomina! surgery' and is unabie to perform heavy duts/ as stili compiain of frain in abdomen off and on. Learned counsei furtr( djrected to getths pstiilonsr r^edicaiiy examsnsd anc! ths pstltionsr has no objeotion if he ia posted consid fair, reasonabie and genusne. constituts 2 «4edicSi Bosrd to er submitted that rsspondent No.2 be iring the medicai opinion of the Board, Prayer "lade by tearn^d counsei for ths petitiQner appeara to te 'herefore, respondent No.2 is directsd to iexstTtiri^ ths petltlorfSf In order to sss a3 to whether ths petitloner is able ^o perform his duttes on the post where he -r- XI-HC-22 sn^i^i ^f?;IR;3T[^T *W4i ''sSte Ban/4 :3^T -4WM4, ^Ti1y'(<»,'feOTR^ r^o an^i's'silWHfer -^- has baen posied, aniTthersaiter according tothsopiRion ofths With the direction afwei; Consequent'y, M.CW.)P| Parties are enfitisd for cfer qiTgfepte tffCRff'? TS^t •(fsR?R '^aiNHsn^i to considar ths pasting of ihe pstiiianar (yjsdicai Board. |aid, the petition stands disposed of. ^n^QQQ/^HQQ also stends disposed o'f. ^rtlfied copy o'this order. Sd.'- L.C.Bhadoo Judge .r^' . -./'• > ^^ ^ ^? ^ [«^rt