IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 8612 of 2008. Reserved on: 06.01.2011. Decided on: 22.02.2011. __________________________________________________________ Rustam. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Dutt Vasudeva, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 4 and 6. Respondent No.5 already ex-parte. Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Petitioner was appointed as Part Time Water Carrier in Government Primary School, Tang Narwana. He joined his duties on 8th March, 2002. The petitioner made a representation to the Deputy Director of Primary Education, Kangra at Dharamshala to the effect that he may be adjusted in Government Primary School, Tangroti instead of Government Primary School, Tang Narwana. In sequel to the representation made by the petitioner, vide letter dated 5.6.2002 he was adjusted/accommodated at Government Primary School, Tangroti. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - Since the petitioner himself has made a representation, he cannot be aggrieved by Annexure A-5, dated 5.6.2002. 2. Mr. Sanjay Dutt Vasudeva, learned counsel for the petitioner has strenuously argued that the Vice-President has obtained his client’s signatures on blank papers and the same have been used to make a representation. This version is not believable. The Vice- President has not been made party in the present proceedings. The petitioner on his own request has been accommodated in Government Primary School, Tangroti in 2002. 3. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. February 22, 2011. (sck).