1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO: 749/2008 IN CRA (ST) NO: 1683/2008 (Pundlik Mangoji Thorat vs. Sau.Sangita Thorat) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders. ...................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. S S Doiphode , Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Patil , Adv.for Respondent CORAM: B.R. GAVAI , J. DATED: 15th February, 2008. *** Heard. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 26 days in filing Civil Revision Application. 3. Shri Doiphode, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that since the applicant is poor agriculture worker, he could not arrange the funds and engage the counsel and, therefore, the delay had occasioned in filing the Revision. He, therefore, submits that the delay is liable to be condoned. 4. Shri Patil, learned counsel on behalf of the respondent, vehemently opposes the application. He 2 submits that no sufficient ground is made out for condonation of delay. 5. However, taking into consideration the facts stated in the application, I am inclined to allow the application. Delay is condoned. Civil Application is allowed. JUDGE sahare