:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1185 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1128 OF2006 Ambadas Sampat Zombade. ...Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ...Respondent. Mr. A.S.Gadkari, APP.for the Respondent. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATE : 1st March, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This appeal has been submitted by the appellant who is under going sentence for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code in Sessions Case No.146 of 2005 decided by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge at Pune but the said appeal is beyond time and hence, this application for condonation of delay. 2. As per the office note, the appeal is beyond time by 90 days and we are satisfied that the delay caused deserves to be condoned. 3. Hence, the application is allowed and the delay is condoned. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.) :2: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1128 OF 2006 Ambadas Sampat Zombade. ...Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ...Respondent. Mr. A.S.Gadkari, APP.for the Respondent. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATE : 1st March, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Admit. 2. Mr.Gadkari, the learned APP. appears for the State. 3. The Registrar (Judicial) is directed to appoint an Advocate for the appellant from the panel prepared and communicate the same to the appellant in the jail concerned. 4. Paper book expedited. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.)