HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3480 of 2011 Date: 09.03.2011 Between : Minjala Krishna Murthy. ….Petitioner And The Superintendent of Police, Warangal & others. ….Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3480 of 2011 ORDER : This writ petition is filed, seeking directions by way of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of respondents 2 to 4 in taking steps pursuant to the representations filed by the petitioner for implementation of the order, dated 06.12.2007, passed in I.A.No.259 of 2007 in O.S.No.355 of 2007 on the file of the III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Warangal, as illegal. The petitioner is plaintiff in the suit. The suit is filed for injunction simplicitor. Pending the suit, petitioner filed I.A.No.259 of 2007 for grant of temporary injunction to restrain respondents 5 and 6 from interfering with his possession. It is the grievance of the petitioner that though said I.A. is allowed, and inspite of filing representations before the Police, no steps are being taken by the Police to implement the orders passed in I.A.No.259 of 2007. On the other hand, it is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for respondents 5 and 6 that the order in I.A.No.259 of 2007 was passed by setting respondents 5 and 6 exparte, as such, they filed I.A.No.16 of 2011, which is pending consideration. It is further submitted that respondents 5 and 6 are in possession of property by purchasing it from the earlier owners by way of a registered sale deed. A perusal of the order in I.A.No.259 of 2007 indicates that it was passed after setting respondents 5 and 6 exparte. As much as it is stated that respondents 5 and 6 have already filed I.A.No.16 of 2011, I do not find any ground to order for implementation of the injunction order, at this point of time. As the suit itself is of 2007, I direct the learned III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Warangal, to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _________________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 9th March 2011 ajr