IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24714 of 2009 MOZAFFAR IMAM @ TUFAIL AHMAD S/O LATE SYED ATTAUR RAHMAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. ISHRAT KHATOON D/O LATE MOTIUR RAHMAN ----------- 3. 16.08.2010 The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 22.6.2009 by which the prayer of the petitioner to be discharge from S.T. No. 11/09 has been dismissed by the Trial Court. The main contention of the petitioner is that in fact the victim is a major and she was a consenting party and therefore no any offence whatsoever is made out against the petitioner. On behalf of the opposite party no. 2, it has been submitted that she was not a consenting party and in fact she had been sexually exploit by the petitioner. In view of the disputed questions of fact as also that the impugned order has well-considered all aspects of the case, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. In view of such, this application is dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )