1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICIATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.632 OF 1998 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-I, Bombay .. Applicant. V/s. Shri J.S. Zaveri .. Respondent. Mr.Parag Vyas with Mr.Ashok Kotangale & Mr.A.S. Rao for the applicant. Ms.Asifa Khan i/b. Vipul Joshi for the respondent. INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.715 OF 1998 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Pune .. Applicant. V/s. Shri Shashikant S. Bhagwat .. Respondent. INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.784 OF 1998 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-II, Bombay .. Applicant. V/s. Mr.R.N. Mafatlal .. Respondent. INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.788 OF 1998 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Nasik .. Applicant. V/s. Shri Vijaykumar G. Rathod .. Respondent. INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.795 OF 1998 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-VIII, Bombay .. Applicant. V/s. Shailesh Wife Trust .. Respondent. INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.797 OF 1998 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Pune .. Applicant. V/s. Bajaj Auto Employees Welfare Trust, Bombay .. Respondent. INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.839 OF 1998 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Pune .. Applicant. V/s. 2 Shri Anil S. Bhagwat .. Respondent. INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.864 OF 1998 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-XI, Bombay .. Applicant. V/s. Shri Nikhil N. Wagle .. Respondent. INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.960 OF 1998 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Pune .. Applicant. V/s. M/s.Ratilal Bhagwandas & Asso. .. Respondent. INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.1048 OF 1998 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City IX, Bombay .. Applicant. V/s. M/s.Neeru Silk Mills .. Respondent. Mr.Parag Vyas with Mr.Ashok Kotangale & Mr.A.S. Rao for the applicant. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 18TH OCTOBER, 2005. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Revenue. He fairly pointed out that considering the quantum of tax involved in all these references, these references can be disposed of applying the law laid down by this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Camco Colour Co. CIT V/s. Camco Colour Co. CIT V/s. Camco Colour Co. [(2002) 254 ITR 565 (Bom)] [(2002) 254 ITR 565 (Bom)] [(2002) 254 ITR 565 (Bom)] and followed by this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Pithwa Engg. Works [(2005) CIT V/s. Pithwa Engg. Works [(2005) CIT V/s. Pithwa Engg. Works [(2005) 276 ITR 519 (Bom)] 276 ITR 519 (Bom)] 276 ITR 519 (Bom)]. 2. Accordingly, all the references are returned unanswered with no order as to costs. 3 ********