IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3309 of 2010 RANJU SHUKLA S/o Late Dev Kumar Shukla Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 06/ 01.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. It would appear from the records that some unknown criminals attacked on the informant and in that course they committed murder of three persons. Apart from that some persons also sustained injury. Admittedly, the petitioner is not named in the FIR and during the course of investigation name of the petitioner surfaced in this case on the basis of disclosure made by the spy of the police in paragraphs 51 and 101 of the case diary. Except the aforesaid paragraphs learned counsel for the State could not succeed to place any material to show the complicity of the petitioner in the alleged crime. Moreover, some co-accused has already been granted privilege of bail by a bench of this court vide order dated 4.10.2005 passed in Cr. Misc. no.29116/2005. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Fatwah P.S. Case no. 68 of 2005 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000-/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Sunil Kumar Mishra, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Patnacity. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J))