IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.36734-M of 2009 Date of Decision:25.2.2010 Kaushalya .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. K.D.S. Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pardeep Virk, D.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. It is stated that the father-in-law has died while in judicial custody. The petitioner, who is the mother-in-law is in custody alongwith new born child, who is about one year or so. In view of the special circumstances of the case, bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehabad. 25.2.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE