IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11402 of 2005 Sat Narayan Rai, son of late Vairo Rai, resident of Maner Talah per, Mohalla-Char hazar, P.S. Maner, Patna …Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Department of Forest and Environment, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Conservator of Forest, Department of Forest and Environment, Patna Circle, Patna 4. The Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Extension Division Patna. 5. The Range Officer, Patna West Sub-Division, Danapur, Department of Forest …Respondents ----------- 02. 27.07.2011 Both sides present. While pressing this application, a stand has been taken by learned counsel for the petitioner that his case is covered by the resolution of the Government issued in the Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, as contained in Annexure-4. It appears from perusal of the aforesaid resolution that a Committee of senior officials of the Government was constituted to submit report with regard to the fate of daily wagers who served the Government for few years and could not be regularized for one reason or the other. The report of the Committee unfortunately is not on record. In this view of the matter, this Court feels difficulty in appreciating the stand of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, has taken a stand that some of the similarly placed persons approached this Court in CWJC Nos. 6626 of 2004 and 6709 of 2 2004. Both the applications were heard and disposed of by order dated 22.06.2005, whereby this Court refused to grant any relief. If the stand of the petitioner is that his case is covered by the resolution of the Government, then the petitioner may approach the competent authority of the Respondent-State in this regard. Based on the pleadings and keeping in view the submissions of the counsel for the respondents, this Court is not inclined to grant any substantive relief. The application is disposed of with liberty aforesaid. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )