IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24350 of 2010 1. BACHCHI DEVI, W/o Karoo Paswan. 2. Muna Paswan, S/o Sukhu Paswan. 3. Karoo Paswan, S/o Sukhu Paswan. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 06.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Even though in the First Information Report the allegation was that the deceased was done to death by her in-laws but subsequently the informant filed a petition before the court below stating therein that his daughter had died on account of diahorrea. In view of such, let the petitioners, above named who happened to be the sister-in-law and brother-in-laws be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 69 of 2010 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who 2 will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)