-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5906 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1374 OF 2004 Vishal Parshuram Sunake ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.Uday Warunjikar Advocate for Applicant Mr.B.H.Mehta A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : OCTOBER 10, 2005 DATE : OCTOBER 10, 2005 DATE : OCTOBER 10, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail. The applicant has been convicted under Sections 3(1)(ii) and 3 and 4 of the M.C.O.C. Act and sentenced to suffer R.I. for five years. The applicant earlier had preferred applications for bail which came to be rejected by this Court. This application has been preferred on the ground that the applicant has -2- undergone more than three years of imprisonment. Even though the applicant has undergone for the said period, I am not inclined to release the applicant on bail as I am of the opinion that the appeal of the applicant can be heard expeditiously. Appeal to be placed on the final hearing board in the week commencing from 17.10.2005. 3. Application is disposed of. [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]