gst 1 wp8680.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO. 8680 OF 2010. Bhimrao Dhondiba Chougule & Anr. .. ... ..Petitioners. V/s Sunanda Mahadev Ingale ... ... .... ..Respondents. Mr.S.S.Patwardhan, Adv. For the petitioners. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. 12th Jan., 2011. PC: The petitioner challenges the concurrent orders vide which the application for temporary injunction filed by the respondent-plaintiff against the present petitioner has been allowed and the appeal preferred by the present petitioner there against has been dismissed. 2. Since there has been an order of injunction operating against the present petitioner for almost a period of four years, I find that any interference at this stage would not be in the interest of justice. 3. I find that the interest of justice would be sub-served by directing the learned trial Court to decide the suit as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of one year from today. The learned trial Court is directed to decide the suit on its own merits without being influenced by the observations made herein. The petition therefore stands disposed of.