IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31371 of 2010 RAJU KUMAR SRIVASTAVA @ DILIP KUMAR S/O SRI SATYA NARAYAN PRASAD…….PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . with Cr.Misc. No.32389 of 2010 PARMOD RAI S/O BADRI RAI…….PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . with Cr.Misc. No.32875 of 2010 RAMESH RAI S/O SRI JAINARAYAN RAI……….PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 12.10.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioner of Cri. Misc. Appeal no.31371 of 2010 is said owner of the shop. Huge quantity of wine is found there. Rest of the petitioners are said assisting the petitioner of Cri. Appeal No.31371 of 2010 in his business; running of the shop is denied basing of a report. Owner of the house is some other person. Ownership of a house is quite different and after completion of the investigation, involvement of petitioners in running the unauthorized business of wine in the shop appeared. Accordingly, the prayer of petitioners for anticipatory bail stands rejected. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)