1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.19504 OF 2007 REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.19504 OF 2007 REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.19504 OF 2007 IN IN IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.54 OF 2007 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.54 OF 2007 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.54 OF 2007 Shri Hemraj Khushalchand : Applicant/ Bhandari : Petitioner versus Shri Dnyaneshwar Narayanrao Chavan : Respondent. Mr.G.S.Godbole i/by M/s.N.N.Vaishanava & Co. for the applicant. Mr.S.M.Kamble with Mr.Rathor Sunil Kumar and for the respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATED : 07/09/2007. DATED : 07/09/2007. DATED : 07/09/2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Submission of learned counsel appearing for the Review Petitioner is that the decree for 2 2 2 possession against the Review Petitioner was on two grounds viz.permanent construction and default. It is submitted that though the submissions were made about the illegality of the decree on the ground of permanent construction, the same are not reflected in order dated 26th April 2007. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the Respondent. 2. It is true that the submissions were advanced even on the ground of permanent construction. However, as the decree for possession was being confirmed on the ground of default, the said submissions on the ground of permanent construction have not been considered.. 3. Review Petition is disposed of subject to aforesaid clarification. Ad-interim order passed in the Civil Revision Application is extended till the end of this month. [A.S.OKA, J.] [A.S.OKA, J.] [A.S.OKA, J.]