HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO. SECOND APPEAL No.1327 of 2011 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 16 23.09.2021 MVR,J I.A.No.2 of 2021 Service against respondents 2 and 3 is sufficient. None represented them. Sri S.Rajan, learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent, reported no objection to allow this petition. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 4th respondent, considering that the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition are making out sufficient cause explaining the delay of 869 days in filing the petitions to set aside the abatement, this petition is allowed. _____ MVR,J I.A.No.3 of 2021 Since I.A.No.2 of 2021 is allowed, this petition is also allowed setting aside the abatement. _____ MVR,J I.A.No.1 of 2021 Since I.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2021 are allowed, this petition is also allowed permitting the respondents 2 to 4 to be brought on record as L.Rs. of the deceased respondent. _____ MVR,J S.A.No.1327 of 2011 Registry is directed to carryout necessary amendment. List on 01.10.2021. _____ MVR,J RR