vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1605 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1605 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1605 OF 2006 IN REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.9649 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3415 OF 2000 Union of India & Anr. ... Applicants V/s. Mohd.Usman A. Bari ... Respondent Mr.T.J. Pandian for Petitioners Mr.S. Ramamurthy for Respondent CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR, Ag. C.J. & V.G. PALSHIKAR, Ag. C.J. & V.G. PALSHIKAR, Ag. C.J. & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. J. J. DATED: AUGUST 29, 2006 AUGUST 29, 2006 AUGUST 29, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Civil application for dealy allowed for reasons mentioned therein. : 2 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.9649 OF 2006 REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.9649 OF 2006 REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.9649 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3415 OF 2000 Union of India & Anr. ... Applicants V/s. Mohd.Usman A. Bari ... Respondent Mr.T.J. Pandian for Petitioners Mr.S. Ramamurthy for Respondent CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR, Ag. C.J. & V.G. PALSHIKAR, Ag. C.J. & V.G. PALSHIKAR, Ag. C.J. & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. J. J. DATED: AUGUST 29, 2006 AUGUST 29, 2006 AUGUST 29, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard Counsel for the Union of India on merits of the Review Petition. No error apparent on the face of the record is committed by us while passing the order impugned. Hence, the Review Petition is dismissed.