THE HONBLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.22064 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: The petitioner is the authorized fair price shop dealer of Pargi-VI. His authorization was cancelled by order dated 3.09.2007 and the Appeal preferred by him was also dismissed by the 2nd respondent herein by order dated 29.02.2008. As against the said order, the petitioner preferred a Revision Petition before the 1st respondent along with an application for stay on 10.04.2008. Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the 1st respondent in considering his Revision Petition as well as the application for stay, the present writ petition is filed. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, without expressing any opinion on merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to dispose of the Revision Petition pending on his ﬁle following due process of law as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, the respondents are directed not to make any permanent appointment of dealer in respect of the fair price shop in question. No costs. 14.10.2008. Kgr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No: 22064 of 2008 Between: D.Susheela W/o.Nagesh, Shop No.6, Pargi Village Pargi Mandal R.R.district ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector,& District Magistrate R.R. District 2 The Joint Collector & Addl.Dist.Magistrate R.R.District 3 The Special Grade Deputy Collector & R.D.O Chevella Divison, Ranga Reddy District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the 1st respondent in entertaining the stay application ﬁled by the petitioner along with unregistered revision ﬁled on10.4.2008 challenging the order dated 29.2.2008 passed by the 2nd respondent in Appeal No.A7/715/2007 and order dated 3.9.2007 in Procgs.No.E/3171/2007 passed by the 3rd respondent as being illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same and be pleased to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. B.VIJAYSEN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: