1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.535 OF 1999 M/s. Panchtara Exports Pvt.Ltd. and others ..Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents .... Mr.T.D.Joshi with Mrs.D.M.Shah Advocate for Petitioners. Mr.A.S.Shitole, A.P.P. for the State. Mr.Santosh Pardeshi for Mr.H.T.Pawar for Respondent no.2. .... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 13,2004 DATE : SEPTEMBER 13,2004 DATE : SEPTEMBER 13,2004 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned advocate for the respondent no.2. 2. The respondent no.2 had filed complaint against the petitioners for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Briefly stated, it is the case of the complainant that three cheques were issued to him by the petitioners in discharge of liability amounting to Rs.7,47,625/-. 2 3. It is an admitted fact that out of Rs.7,47,625/-, an amount of Rs.4,70,000/- has been received by the complainant. Now the consent terms have been filed between the parties which are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. It is agreed that the Demand Drafts for the amounts mentioned in the consent terms will be handed over by the learned advocate for the petitioners to the learned advocate for the respondent no.2 on or before 12th of every month. . Petition is disposed of in view of the consent terms. . Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J)