Civil Writ Petition No. 10699 of 2009 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Writ Petition No. 10699 of 2009 Date of Decision: 21.7.2009 J.S. Bhatia, Advocate …Petitioner Versus Union of India and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Whether to be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. J.S. Bhatia, Advocate Petitioner in person. T.S. Thakur, C.J. (Oral) We have heard the petitioner at some length and perused the averments made in the writ petition. We are of the opinion that the present is not a fit case in which we ought to exercise our jurisdiction in public interest, especially when the petitioner has an efficacious remedy by way of a suitable representation to the Competent Authority under the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 and to the Government of India for action against the alleged violation of the Civil Writ Petition No. 10699 of 2009 2 Programme Code under the policy guidelines applicable for uplinking and downlinking of Television Channels. Appropriate corrective and or remedial steps which, according to the petitioner, need to be taken in the matter can also be suggested to the above authorities for their consideration. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to make such a representation, this writ petition is disposed of. (T.S.Thakur) Chief Justice (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge July 21, 2009 “DK”