IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 12 of 2007 M/s Sonakshi Construction Pvt. and Ors..Appellants V/s Smt.Suidha Ramchandra Hatkar and Ors.. Respondents Shri Dinesh Jindali for Repsondent Mr.Clive D’Souza with G.H.Keluskar for Appellant H.Teer with .A.B.Ketkar i/b M.V.Keni and Co. for Respondent no.2 CORAM:S.R.SATHE,J. DATED:14th Sept.2007 P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Appellant. 2. From the submission made before me it is very clear that dispute was initially in respect of restoration of water supply and electric supply. However, as submitted by the learned Advocate for the appellants the flat to which the said electric supply and water supply was to be provided is in fact handed over to the Appellant in pursuance of the order passed by this Court (Coram:A.M.Khanwilkar,J). So, now the present AO which is filed against the order whereby the Appellant was directed to restore the electric supply and water supply has in fact become infractuous. 3. Hence A.O. disposed of accordingly. (S.R.SATHE,J.)