IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 94 of 2010 MUKHTYAR AHMED & ANR V/S BANK OF BARODA & ANR Mr. MOTI SINGH, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 15.2.2010 HON'BLE SHRI A.M.SAPRE,J. HON'BLE SHRI DINESH MAHESHWARI,J. ORDER ----- This is an intracourt appeal filed by the writ petitioner under Rule 134 of the Rajasthan High Court Rules against an order dated 21.11.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.5110/2009. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and on perusal of the record of the case including the impugned order, we find that the impugned order dated 21.11.2009 is essentially a consent order. In this view of the matter, no appeal would lie against such consent order. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as not maintainable. Learned counsel for the appellant then made a prayer that appellant may be granted liberty to apply before learned Single Judge seeking modification of the order. The appellant in our opinion is always free to apply to seek modification of the impugned order in the form of review and/or clarification as may be permissible to him in law. No cost. (DINESH MAHESHWARI ),J. ( A.M.SAPRE ),J. /tarun/