IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 5TH JUNE 2008 / 15TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 16754 of 2008(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- K.CHANDRALEKHA, AGED 57 YEARS, W/O. LATE G.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, 'SWAPNA', HOUSE NO.15/600, KUNNATHOOARMEDU P.O., PALAKKAD -678 013. BY ADV. SRI.V.GOPIKRISHNA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ADDL. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, PUBLIC OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD. 5. THE DIRECTOR, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. THE SOUTHERN RAILWAY, REPRESENTED BY THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.N.B.SUNIL NATH,SC, RAILWAYS FOR R6 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.R. SREELATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.16754 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 5th June, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved by Exhibit P4 order passed by the Government, by which the pension being drawn by the petitioner has been reduced to the minimum as per Rule 59 (b) of Part III of the K.S.R. According to the petitioner, there are several circumstances, which, if considered by the Government, would result in a variation of Exhibit P4 and restoration of the pension which is normally been drawn by the petitioner. 2. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader. I have perused Exhibits P4 and P5. By the very nature of an order under Rule 59 (b), it is capable of revision by the Government, if new factors are brought to the notice of the Government as such. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider Exhibit P5 and take a decision thereon, after hearing the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. (V.GIRI, JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.16754 of 2008 2