IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28610 of 2009 SANDHYA DEVI W/O Kameshwar Rai, resident of Village- Hetanpur, P.S. Shahpur, District- Patna...............................................Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar....................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 14.9.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner,informant and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner alongwith her husband has been made accused in a case under Sections 323,324,379,302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant is the own Dewar of the petitioner. There appears to be some dispute in between them with respect to the property. The petitioner’s husband has been absconding in this case. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the trial in this case has commenced and one witness has been examined to support the case. Counsel for the petitioner on the other hand submits that there is no body to look after pairvi for her in this case and the court has appointed some lawyer to conduct the case on her behalf. Considering that the petitioner is a lady, I direct that the petitioner Sandhya Devi be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the J.M. Ist Class, 2 Danapuar, Patna, in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case 145 of 2008 with the following conditions. (A) The bailors should file an affidavit stating that the petitioner would be produced on each and every date during the pendency of the trial and if she absent even on a single date, the bailors would be held responsible and the bail bond of the petitioner would be cancelled. (B) The photographs of the bailors should be affixed with the bail bond. (C) The Officer-in-charge of Shahpur police Station should be informed regarding grant of bail so that he will be vigilant ensuring that the petitioner does not try to abscond. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)