IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 651 (MS) of 2009 Alu Phal Aarthi Vyapari, Association, Navin Mandi Shthal, Haldwani …Petitioner Versus Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad, Dehradun and another …Respondents Mr. Lalit Belwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.C. Belwal, Advocate for the respondents. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the averment made by the respondents in paragraph-26 of counter affidavit in Writ Petition No. 1099 (MS) of 2009, he does not want to press prayer no. 1 of the writ petition. He further submitted that petitioner may be permitted to file representation before the respondents and respondents be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner expeditiously. Learned counsel for the respondents does not have any objection to this prayer. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction that if the petitioner moves fresh representation before the respondents within a period of one week from today, the same shall be disposed of in accordance with law within three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. It is made clear that the respondents are not prevented from making allotment of shops to the traders. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (V.K. Bist, J.) VKG 20.08.2009