1 ndm 2 caf.4264.02 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4264 OF 2002 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 3577 OF 2002 Mrs. Shernaz Pesi Ravji and ors. ... APPLICANTS Vs. M/s. Frozen Freight Carriers and anr. ... RESPONDENTS -------- Mr. T.J. Mendon for the Applicants. None for the Respondents. -------- CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 03 rd August, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the Applicants. None appears for the Respondent No.2, though served. The application already stands dismissed on account of conditional order as against Respondent No.1. The learned counsel for the Applicants submits that the Applicants would pursue the matter only against Respondent No.2. That statement is placed on record. 2 2 For the reasons mentioned in the application, in our view being sufficient cause and which have remained uncontroverted, the application deserves to be allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) considering the fact that the delay is only of 56 days. Hence, Application is allowed on the above terms. In view of the above, appeal shall proceed only against Respondent No.2, who will be the sole Respondent, for admission. [ A.A. SAYED, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]