IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31381 of 2011(W) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- KHALEEL RAHMAN.M.M,S/O.MUHAMMED.M.M, MANICAL HOUSE,PALARIMANGALAM (PO),KOTHAMANGALAM, PIN 686 671,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN, SRI.R.REJI, SMT.THARA THAMBAN, SRI.B.BIPIN, SMT.REVATHY P.NAIR. RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM,REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR 686 001. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM 686 001. 3. THE REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM 686 001. 4. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM 686 001. R1 TO R4 BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.31381/2011 W APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 27/10/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P1(A) TRUE COPY OF THE PAY-IN-SLIP DATED 27/10/2011 SHOWING REMITTANCE OF FEE FOR REVALUATION BY THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 28/8/1990. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE EXTRACT OF THE REVISED GUIDELINES FOR REVALUATION OF ANSWER BOOKS OF KERALA UNIVERSITY. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 31381 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 3rd Semester examination was declared, he got less marks. He applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 4th respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-