1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Civil Writ Petition No.9067 of 2003 Machindra Rangrao Waghmode Petitioner Vs. Radhabai Bajrang Vhanmane & anr. Respondents Mr.Vikas Kolekar for petitioner. Mr.S.R.Singh for Resp.No.2. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. June 12, 2006. P.C. . The impugned order passed by the learned Member of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sangli on 16/8/2003 arises from an application filed at Exhibit 5 by the claimant under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. It was the case of the claimant that she had sustained serious injuries on account of accident on 31/5/1995 when she was hit by the said vehicle i.e. tempo bearing No.MH-30-A-9197 while reversing. . The Tribunal noted that the accident was not disputed and so was the case with respect to the claimant’s personal disability. The Tribunal, therefore, directed the present petitioner-owner to pay an amount of Rs.25,000/- by way of no-fault liability and this order has been in operation for 2 almost three years now. . The order impugned does not call for any interference in a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution. Hence the petition is rejected summarily. (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)