?E'E1’f1€)N {$3 N9. 1%}13 ($2993 WEff . Ashok Kuma? Tiwari Sfo Shri Bhagiraihi TiwarL aga $30113 48 yeaxs‘ Asstt. Teachex: Goait. Primarv $311001, Karesara, Biack ~ Saza, Educai’ion Dixtt w Bsmeiara. Disit. Duz'g (CG) )Ix Ganga Ram Vanna S/o Shli Chaim Ram Veyma Aga about 50 vears ASstt. Teacher, Gaw. ?rimary School Kenwatm; Biogk i Saga, Eémaiiem Distt, ~ Eagg1etara, EIS‘x‘t. Dui‘g KCG.) I K 39amaanm1d Sa’m S/o Shu Shebha Ram Sahu Age about 49 wears. Asstt. sachet Govt. Middle Schooi, S11“: mi. Block ~ CEwhuékhadan. Dim. ~ Rajnandgaon (CG) State '{jvmm of Chha‘aisgam Th}'0ugh : Secrataw, Education & Tribal Depamxlant D.K.S. Bhavau, Dis§yict Edgcatioa Ofiicer, Disit. — Bemetara, Durg’Rajmndgaon (0%.) VERSw Raivux‘ (CG § 2. . Biack Education Officer, Biock — SaZa/Chhuildmdmi. WEE“ 1‘ETET10N7 UNDER ARHCLE 225 OF TE- E CONS?ETUTEON OF fN‘DIA 3% 3031’ @§e S§a1°i Satish K. Agmimiri. .3. {Fassed {m }8L3day sf 'Eebruary, 2008} 2 Tke questior: ofEm/V imolwd Emmi}: is ago wheiher :he peiizioners are emitled i0 regaiar pay scale with effect fmm the date ef initial apipointment or fmm ‘éw {hie of sompkéion ofgirobaticm perisé. @RAL @QEEEE E§E§§ CKESKT {)F €EgAri"1‘i§IGARE A? EELAS?§R 13resm‘it $hn ‘hm’ Sommm Alok Bakshj‘. Vmma Géveml’xent Ada ocate A‘dvoeaie for the pe‘quonw %03‘ th:Sta:e,/rgsyonéants. 1. The petitioners were mitiaRy agapoimeé on 03.01.1994. 30.01l999 and 3Q.Q1.1999 respectively, as Assisizmt Teachers on a :{ixed pay of Rs. 4000/- 031 pmbaiioi} f0; a perioé of 1W0 years. A§€r cempia‘im of pra‘hazim, the pet§tione:s were gamed regular pay scale of Rs. 4G00- 109—6600i— or; {)2.02.2061, 04.82.2001 and 19.99.2300 respee‘iive}y. @ N 3‘ Learned mums} appearmg fai‘ the paiitiouers as weE as for the State/raspomdems j ointly submit that the fasts and queStion of 1aw involved in the patitioz} are tha same ”£0 ihai of WP. N0. 1463 0f 20(36 (Aémzm Jam Vs. Ths Staie Gwemment of Chha‘ttisgarh & amihsr), which was agoweai u Vida ordai‘ éazed 10.11.20G6. Leameci comma} fm‘tEaer submits ihat tiiis patiiion may be dispssed Ofin the same terms. 4‘ Ia View of thg abave siabed submissioa made by 1eamed com1se1 fer Qw ”miss; he; “at Damion is aEowed k1 the 3ame terms is. the pa‘ii‘iiorierS are ailoweii to make reyfesemaiion within a parioé of EWQ weeks from $0§ay m respondem No. 1 raising aE ilwir grievames, ami in mm, rawmdsm No. 1 'hal} degide {$19. said represemation in an Objeciive marmer Within a period of 30 days fmm i11e date 0f receipi Qf 33911 reprsmata‘don, afier censMerinE, w all 1 ihe points raised by :he peii:ioners and ’{aking wig accoum the order dated 31.1.2000 passed by the Eeamec‘: Staie Administrative Tribunal m Origmal Amiiea‘tion No. 1452 of 1998, 2316 if the netitionem staae on the same foo‘imgs, as “me petitiozxer ii Ehe Original ApeEiea§ien No. 1452 0; 1‘ E98, J»!zaem Ehey be 5&30 seizei'io 3e ’{he same pay scale 251d seeiority. The em: petition is; aceordingly dispesed cf wiih ihe afex‘esaié directioz}, whee: to veziiication ofthe facts. No order asto cesis. f Sd/— 1‘ Satish K. Agnihnzyi ;u: 4x UI \ Judge 1