WRIT PETITION 6976/2011(s) Rai Singh Sikarwar Versus State of M.P. and others WRIT PETITION NO. 6968/2011(S) Rajendra Parashar Versus State of M.P. and others WRIT PETITION NO. 6969/2011(S) Rajeev Latouria Versus State of M.P. and others ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Petitioner by Shri Raj Shrivastava, Advocate. (W.P. 6968/11 & W.P. 6969/11) Petitioner by Shri Pavan Dwivedi, Advocate (WP 6976/2011) Respondents/State by Shri Udit Saxena, Panel Lawyer on advance notice. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ O R D E R (20/10/2011) Petitioner is aggrieved by transfer order dated 05/10/2011, whereby he is transferred beyond his seniority unit, which may effect his seniority and future prospects of promotion. He relied on 2008(2) M.P.H.T. 80 (CG) [Abhishek Kumar Dani Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others] and submits that Annexure-P/1 is not passed inconsonance with the transfer policy. I deem it proper to dispose of this petition without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case with the following directions:- 1) The petitioner shall prefer a representation alongwith copy of this order passed today before the respondent No.2 within a week from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 2) In turn, respondent No.2 shall consider and decide it as expeditiously as possible. Till the decision on the representation, for which the petitioner may take all possible grounds, the impugned order Annexure-P/1 shall remain stayed. It is made clear that if petitioner does not prefer representation within a week, the aforesaid interim protection shall not be available to him. With the aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. (SUJOY PAUL) Judge vr/-