WP(C) 6401/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B. K. SHARMA Heard Ms. S. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the petitioner as well a s Mr. A.D. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, Education. The petitioner is aggrieved by discontinuation of his service as Assista nt Teacher in a venture School, namely, Teteli Bhangori Meser Ali L.P. School, i n the district of Darrang. He was appointed in the School in the year 1996 (7.8. 96) by the authority of the said School. On being asked as to how the School bei ng a venture School can be amenable to writ jurisdiction, learned counsel for th e petitioner could not give any satisfactory answer. Mr. A.D. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, Education, has placed reli ance on the Division Bench decision of this Court dated 28.7.2010 passed in WA 2 27/2010, by which it has been held that the venture Schools are not amenable to writ jurisdiction. Admittedly, there is no control of the Govt. in the affairs o f the School. That being the position, writ jurisdiction cannot be exercised over the said School, which as per the own admission of the petitioner is at the venture stage. If the petitioner is aggrieved by discontinuation of his service, it will be open for him to agitate his grievance elsewhere in accordance with law. Writ petition stands disposed of, without however, any order as to costs .