THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P.No. 48 of 2011 Dated. 21–01-2011 Between: Vennapu Reddamma and another. …Petitioners Vs. Suravarapu Venkata Suryanarayana Murthy and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P.No. 48 of 2011 ORAL ORDER: This is a misconceived revision filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India directed against the order dated 13-12-2010 of the learned III-Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, East Godavari District rejecting in I.A.No. 1002 of 2010 in O.S.No. 351 of 2006. The revision petitioners are defendant Nos. 2 and 4, who filed the application I.A.No. 1002 of 2010 to reopen the suit and recall P.W.1 for further cross-examination. The said application was rejected by the Court below recording the following reasons: This case is pertaining to the year 2006, and has been included in the list of old 100 identified cases. Though P.W.1 has been subjected for cross-examination at length way back in July, 2009, having availed number of adjournments, filed this application belatedly. Law is settled well, that the ground that certain instructions are not given during the cross-examination of P.W.1 way back in July, 2009 is considered to be vague ground and therefore, this Court is hesitating to reopen the suit. The petitioners do not deserve for the relief since the facts and circumstances of the case squarely fall within the ambit of decisions relied on by the learned counsel for the respondents. Therefore, the petition is dismissed, no costs. This Court discerns no error in the exercise of discretion by the Court below warranting revisional interference under Article 227 of the Constitution. The application I.A.No. 1002 of 2010 is apparently filed for interminable protraction of the suit and has been rightly rejected. There are no merits. The revision is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. No costs. ___________________________ JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM Dated: 21-01-2011 Pvks/*