1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PARSI CHIEF MATRIMONIAL COURT SUIT NO.10 OF 2008 Y.P.Dandiwala .. Plaintiff No.1 Versus H.Y.Dandiwala .. Plaintiff No.2 Ms.A.S.Kaushik for plaintiffs CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 4th April 2008 P.C. . This is a suit filed for a decree for divorce dissolving the marriage by invoking jurisdiction of this Court under section 32-B of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936. 2. Plaintiffs were married on 4th May 1979 according to Parsi Zorashtrian rites and customs as evidenced by the Marriage Certificate Exh.A. 2 They are domiciled in India. There are two issues from the marriage and it is pointed out in para 4 that the plaintiffs are not living together since 10th December 2006. In para 5 it is stated that on account of serious differences of opinion and considering that they are living separately, it is agreed mutually that the marriage between them should be dissolved. The petition has been filed after complying with the Statutory requirements and stating on oath that the consent has been granted willingly and without any pressure or force. 3. The terms arrived at are annexed as Exh.B and apart from the fact that they carve out life interest in favour of certain immovable properties, they also incorporate the statement and undertakings to pay the sums as stipulated in clauses 2 and 3. Further, there are annexures to these consent terms which incorporate the jewellery items and which are to be retained by 3 plaintiff No.2. There are further agreements which are recorded. The consent terms are also duly signed by the plaintiffs and their Advocates. There is an affidavit filed in support of the plaint and affidavit in evidence of both plaintiffs which state clearly that the averments in the plaint are confirmed and that there is no pressure or force and the arrangement is arrived at willingly. The said affidavits are taken on record and marked as "X" and "Y" respectively. 4. From reading of the plaint I am satisfied that the statutory requirement is satisfied and that there is no fraud or coercion. In such circumstances, there will be a decree as prayed. The undertakings contained in the consent terms are accepted. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order. 4 (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)