IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR WRIT PETITION NO. 7909 of 1995 Between: 1. P.Dhavaleswara Rao, s/o.Trinadha Swamy, Palakonda, Srikakulam District ….. PETITIONER AND 1. The District Collector and Special Officer, District Co-Operative Central Bank, Srikakulam. 2. The General Manager, Distrcit Co-Operative Central Bank, Srikakulam. 3. The Branch Manager, District Co-Operative Central Bank, Palakonda, Srikakulam Distrcit. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in removing the petitioner from service as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service and regularize his services with effect from the date of his initial appointment and pass such other order orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.V.V.N.NARASIMHAM, Advocate For the Respondent No.1 Government Pleader for Co-Operatives Counsel for the Respondents No. 2 and 3: MR.KOKA RAGHAVA RAO, Advocate The Court made the following:- ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed with the prayer as follows: “Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in removing the petitioner from service as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service and regularize his services with effect from the date of his initial appointment and pass such other order orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.” The respondents 2 and 3 are Cooperative Societies registered under the A.P. Co-Operative Societies Act. Nothing is placed on record to demonstrate that these respondents against whom the relief in the writ petition is sought are amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this Court. In these circumstances, I do not see any reason to discuss the merits of the case and hence, the writ petition is dismissed on this ground. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. __________________ 2nd September , 2004 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The District Collector and Special Officer, District Co-Operative Central Bank, Srikakulam. 2. The General Manager, Distrcit Co-Operative Central Bank, Srikakulam. 3. The Branch Manager, District Co-Operative Central Bank, Palakonda, Srikakulam Distrcit. 3. Two CC to Government Pleader for Co-Operatives, High Court buildings, Hyderabad(OUT). 4. Two CD copies