IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13188 of 2011 Mukesh Kumar Yadav S/O Subhodh Yadav R/O Vill. Bhusi, P.S. Daraunda, P.O. Mahual Mahal, Distt. Siwan …petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India the Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs Government of India, New Delhi 2. The State Of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Siwan 3. The Director Inspector General, Group Centre, Kendraiya Reserve Police Force, Patna, Bihar 4. The Deputy Inspector General, Group Centre, Kendraiya Reserve Police Force Jhapha, Muzaffarpur 5. The Director General, C.R.P.F., CGO Complex New Delhi Respondents For the petitioner :M/s Binod Kumar Singh, Akshay Lal Prasad For the respondents :Mr. Raghib Ahsan, Asstt. Solicitor General ----------- 03. 27.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Respondent-Union of India and its officials. Petitioner was an applicant for the post of Constable/GD (Male) in the Central Reserve Police Force (for short „CRPF‟). It is the case of the petitioner that he was held successful at the physical eligibility test followed by written test whereafter he was subjected to medical fitness test. The said test was carried out on 26.04.2011 whereafter the Board found the petitioner medically unfit due to the following reasons:- “Systolic Murmur in the Left Auxiliary Region” Petitioner got himself medically examined by a doctor at Sadar Hospital, Siwan whereafter he was found medically fit. The findings of the doctor of the CRPF was/were found an 2 error of judgment. Armed with the aforesaid medical fitness certificate, the petitioner preferred appeal/application for subjecting him to Review Medical Board. It is the case of the petitioner that on such application having been filed, he was again subjected to Review Medical Board on 27.05.2011 whereafter certain investigation/test(s) were carried out and the doctor found the Murmer normal but he was declared medically unfit due to high rate of heart beat. It is the case of the petitioner that he again got himself medically examined by the doctor who, after conducting the required investigation including Electro-Cardio Graph, found the petitioner normal. Relevant documents in this regard have been enclosed as Annexures-3 and 4. The petitioner thereafter made a representation before the Respondent-DIG, Group Centre, Muzaffarpur (Annexure-5) which remained unattended till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the said respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner in the light of the documents attached therewith and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a specified period. Learned counsel for the Respondent-Union of India, in view of the aforesaid stand taken by the petitioner, does not object to the disposal of the application in the aforesaid terms. Having heard the parties and on perusal of materials on record, this Court is satisfied that the present 3 application be disposed of by the following order:- Let the petitioner file a fresh copy of Anenxure-5 supported by all documents of medical fitness in his possession as also a copy of the present order before the DIG (respondent no.4) within four weeks from today. If the representation is filed in the manner indicated above, the said respondent shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law. by a speaking order as soon as possible preferably within four weeks of its filing under intimation to the petitioner. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )