^•inia^ -S^'S, /flyia" j? ^ ,."^^ fr^?--^..,.*1''^ 1'%.^ Jl 'ik\ -IS- :'1^ '•< '''^^^t.i Q3) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J Appelliant Applicant Respondents Non-applicants Misc ADpeal (Cl No. 1021 of 2009 Smt. Jankibai age about 26 years, w/o Sudarshan r/o vill. Pama Tah. Gunderdahi and distt. Durg C.G. VERSUS 1 Ratish Pathak age about 45 years s/o Ramakant Pathak r/o Bainipattri near bus stand, P.S. Baini, distt. Madhubani (Bihar) 2 Regional Sales Office (C.V.D.) Tata Engineering and locomotive Co. Itd, Survey No.46, Vill. Sharoli. Bombay Nagpur Highway ki Badi, Baipass ki Badi (Maharashtra) 3 Divisional Manager, the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Power House Bhitai, distt. Durg C.G. Miscellaneous Appeal under Sectton 173 of Motor Vehicles Act Present : None for the appellant. Shri Shailendra Sharma, counset for respondent No.3. ORDER ith (12mJuly,2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellant. 'F~\ ?i ,;,: 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The appeat, therefore, is dismissedfpi^want of prosecution. Sd/- Rangnath Chandrakar Judge Sd/- Chief Justice nimmi