... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2592 OF 2002 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2592 OF 2002 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2592 OF 2002 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2383 OF 2006 FIRST APPEAL NO.2383 OF 2006 FIRST APPEAL NO.2383 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri S.N.Gawade, A.G.P for the Applicant. Shri P.N.Joshi for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : JANUARY 09, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 09, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 09, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned A.G.P for the Applicant. The challenge in the First Appeal is to the Judgment and Award dated 31st August, 1999 passed by the District Court in a reference under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. For a period of more than seven years there is no ad-interim relief operating in favour of the Applicant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for stay cannot be considered. Application is rejected. However, withdrawal of the compensation amount by the Respondents will be subject to final outcome of the Appeal. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE