3% HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER Plaintiff RESPONDENTS Defendant WRIT PETITION (227) NO. 4735 OF 2011 VERSUS 1 . 10. 11. Jethiya Bai, D/o Bhangi Gond (W/o Shri Thanwar), Caste Gond, aged about 55 years, R/o Village Louda, Tahsil Mungeli, District Bilaspur (C.G.). At Present R/o Bilha, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.J. Agrawal Seva Samiti Bilha, Through Shri Moolchand Agrawal, President, R/o Bilha, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). Moolchand Agrawal, S/O Late Shri Jamuna Das, aged about 6O years, R/o Bilha, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.}. Chouthmal, S/o Late Shri Chiranjeev Lal Agrawal, aged about 7O years, Through Shankar Rice Mill, Bilha, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.)i Sagarmal, S/o Late Shri Ramchandra Agrawal, aged about 7O years, Through Shankar General Store, Kaveri Bihar Jamnipali, N,T.P.C. Korba, Talisil Katghora, District Korba (C.G.). State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Collector, Bilaspur (C,G.). Ramnarayan, S/o Dhursaram, R/o Bilha, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). Vali Mohammad, S/o Abdul Khan, R/o Bilha, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). Morniram, $/o Surajmal, Caste Sindhi, R/o Bilha, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.Gi)r Gulrajmal, S/o Tunumal, R/o Bilha, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). Shobhram Relwani, S/o totaram Relwani, Caste Sindhia, R/o Bilha, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). Trilok Chand, S/O Arjun Das, R/o Bilha, District Bilaspur (C,Gi). #4" g, / 2f WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:~ Shri Malay Kumar Bhaduri, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sumit Jhanwar, P.L. for the State/respondent No. 5. Respondents No. 1 to 4 $1, 6 to 11 not noticed. ,V ORAL~ ORDER (Passed on 18/08/201 1) 1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India petitioner has challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 20/6/2011 passed by Civil Judge, Class—1, Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) in civil suit No. 39—A/2011 whereby application filed for ‘impleading some other persons as party by the petitioner/plaintiff has been refused by the Court below. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to filo appropriate application in terms of Order 22 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 on the ground of death of defendants No. 6 8:, 11 namely Ramnarayan and Trilok Chand. Prayer allowed. Consequently, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid libertyi No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge