IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 37 OF 2011 THE COMMUNIDADE OF CORTALIM THROUGH ITS SPECIAL ATTORNEY, DR. PETER CARVALHO ALIAS PEDRO E. CARVALHO ... Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF GOA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Shri Jose Filipe Melo, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri Vivek Rodrigues, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mrs. A. Agni, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Respondent No.4 in person. Coram:- S.B. DESHMUKH & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 31st January, 2011 P.C.:- Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and learned Counsel for respondent No.3. The main grievance of the petitioner is that there was no decision arrived at by respondent No.3 on the application dated 26-11-2010 filed by them before the said respondent. Learned Advocate for respondent No.3 states that the decision on the said application is the one dated 3-1-2011 as shown at page 47 of the petition. Learned Advocate further submits that the petitioner has a remedy in law to challenge the said decision in case he is so aggrieved. In view of the said statement of the learned Advocate for respondent No.3, nothing survives in the present petition, as the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall pursue such remedy, as available in law. Petition stands dismissed accordingly. All contentions raised by the parties are left open and it is made clear that we have not decided on the merits of the claim of the petitioner. S.B. DESHMUKH, J. F. M. REIS, J. RD.