1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.918 OF 2011 Tejubhai Isardas Lalwani .Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.Umesh Mankapure, Advocate, for the Applicant Smt.S.V.Sonawane, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. From the FIR, it is clear that the offence which the applicant is alleged to have committed is one punishable under Section 25(1) (b)(h) or 25(1)(b)(a) of the Arms Act which attracts punishment between one to three years and therefore, is bailable. In view of this, since the applicant would undoubtedly be 2 admitted to bail the moment he is arrested by police or any other authorities, there is no need to grant anticipatory bail, which cannot be granted in any case in view of provisions of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)