IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Civil Contempt Petition No. 262 of 2004 Smt. Nazma Khatoon and others …………. Petitioners Versus Smt. Vibha Puri Dass, Pricipal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department State of Uttaranchal & others ………… Respondents Mr. Paresh Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners. None for the respondents. Hon’ble P.C. Pant,J. This is a civil contempt petition moved under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. 2) Heard learned counsel for the applicant/ petitioners. 3) This contempt petition has been moved complaining the disobedience of the order dated 12 March, 2004 passed in writ petition No. 210(M/B) of 2004. The direction issued in said order was for disposing of the representations (Annexure Nos. A-1, A-2, and A-3 of said writ petition) within a period of three weeks. Paper No. 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 annexed with the petition itself show that the respondents have disposed of the representations. 4) The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the representations have not been duly disposed of and orders are erroneous. The petitioner may challenge the orders passed on the representation but so far wilful disobedience of the orders passed by the Court is concerned, the provisions of Contempt of Court Act, are not attracted in view of the fact that the compliance has been made by disposing of the representations of the petitioners. The civil contempt petition is accordingly dismissed in limine and notices are discharged accordingly. (P.C.Pant,J.) Dt. 6th October, 2004 HN