:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION EXECUTION EXECUTION EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 144 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO. 144 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO. 144 OF 2003 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1116 OF SUIT NO. 1116 OF SUIT NO. 1116 OF 2003 2003 2003 Dilip Shamji Pasad. ... Plaintiff. V/s. A.P.S. International Inc. & Ors. ... Defendants. Ms. Sheela K. Mistry for the Plaintiff. Mr. J.V. Parmar for the Defendants. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 24TH 24TH 24TH FEBRUARY 2009. FEBRUARY 2009. FEBRUARY 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . It is stated that the decree can be marked satisfied. The property has been sold and the sale proceeds are lying with the Sheriff. Needless to state that after adjusting the decretal sum so also accounting for all expenses, costs and charges of sale, the amount so as to satisfy the decree shall be handed over to the Decree Holder and the balance sum must be handed over to the Judgment Debtor No.3/Defendant No.3, in fact, there was no reason for any modification as this is the normal rule when a decree is to be marked satisfied after sale. 2. Nonetheless, the Minutes of Order dated 24th February 2009 signed by the Plaintiff/Decree Holder and his Advocate so also by the Judgment Debtors through their Constituted Attorneys and their Advocates are taken on record. There will be an order in terms of the Minutes. All proceedings stand disposed off. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)