THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.28061 of 2005 Date:30.12.2005 Between: A.Rajanna -------PETITIONER AND Sarada Vidyaniketan and others ---------RESPONDENTS ORDER: The petitioner states that he was initially appointed as L.D.C. in the first respondent- school and was later appointed as teacher in 1996 on acquiring B.Ed. qualification. He contends that an aided post of School Assistant is remaining vacant in the first respondent-school and that though he made number of representations in this regard, no action has been taken for absorbing him against the said vacancy. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for School Education. Even assuming that an aided post of teacher is remaining vacant in the first respondent-school, the petitioner cannot have any independent right against it, unless the management has submitted the necessary proposals. An unaided teacher in a school does not have the right to insist that he must be absorbed against an aided vacancy. Therefore, the petitioner has to work out his remedies against the management. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to make a necessary representation to the first respondent, who, in turn, shall take the same into account, and intimate the petitioner of the outcome of such consideration. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ 30.12.2005 kdl