1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Tenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) Nos.12688 and 12697 of 2011 1.M.SIKKANDAR 2.Y.KAJA MOHIDEEN 3.M.AJMEER KHAN ... (*)PETITIONERS 1,2,3/ ACCUSED NOS.1,4 & 3 IN CRL.OP(MD)NO.12688/2011 1.M.HAKKIM 2.A.FATHIMA 3.M.AYISHA ... (*)PETITIONERS 1,2,3 ACCUSED NOS.2,6 & 5 IN CRL.OP(MD)NO.12697/2011 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT (*)IN CR.NO. 592 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT IN BOTH THE CASES For Petitioner : M/S. S.MUNIYANDI Advocate in both the cases For Respondent : MR. K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) in both the cases PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for offence under Section 306 IPC, in (*)Crime No.592 of 2011, the petitioners come out with these petitions seeking anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of prosecution, the wife of the first accused had illicit intimacy with the brother of the deceased. This was seen by the mother of the first accused. As a protest, it is stated, that all the accused, who are family members of A1, went to the house of the deceased reprimanded the brother of the deceased. The deceased got defamed by the said allegation. As a result, he committed suicide by hanging. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would deny all the above allegations and further submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.I have considered the rival submissions. 5.Having regard to the nature of the allegations made against the brother of the deceased and the subsequent events and the further fact that the investigation has made substantial progress. I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners but with conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners in Crl.OP(MD)No.12688 of 2011 and the first petitioner in Crl.OP(MD)NO.12697 of 2011 shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m., without fail until further orders. The petitioners 2 and 3 in Crl.OP(MD)No.12697 of 2011 shall report before the All Women Police Station at Madurai for a period of eight weeks. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 10/10/2011 (*)Amended as per order of this Hon'ble Court made in MP.(MD)Nos.1 & 1/2011 in Crl.OP(MD)Nos.12688 & 12697/2011 dated 08.11.2011 by STJ / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO (*)To be substituted to the order already despatched 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MELUR 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MELUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT 4 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADURAI 5 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. S.MUNIYANDI Advocate SR.No.38464 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.12688 & 12697 of 2011 Date :10/10/2011 TR :11.10.2011: 2p/7c ssk/11.11.2011 /7c -2p/- https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/