THE HONOURBALE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WP NO.6061 OF 2003 & C.C.70 of 2005 Between: B.Ramulu son of Ramdas .…petitioner Vs. APSRTC, rep. By its Regional Manager, and another …Respondents THE HONOURBALE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WP NO.6061 OF 2003 & C.C.70 of 2005 COMMON ORDER It is conjointly represented by Sri V.Narsimha Goud the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.T.M.Prasad the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Corporation that the interim order of this Court dated.20-01-2004 in W.P.M.P.No.7937 of 2003 in W.P.No.6061 of 2003 directing the respondents to grant the petitioner the benefit of 12 years increment on his current basic, has been implemented. In fact the relief sought in the writ petition is against the action of the respondent-corporation rejecting the petitioner’s claim for grant of 12 years stagnation increment from the date of completition of his 12 years service. It is now conceded on behalf of the respondents that the petitioner is entitled to and has been granted the 12 years stagnation increment. In an additional counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the 1st respondent it is specifically stated that the petitioner’s claim for payment of stagnation increment with arrears was admitted and an order dated.05-04-2005 passed by the Deputy Chief Personnel Manager placing the petitioner in special grade w.e.f. 01-08-1996 and that the arrears of pay on this account have also been granted to the petitioner. In the aforementioned circumstances and in view of the above developments no further proceedings are warranted either in C.C.No.70 of 2005 or in the substantive writ petition. The official respondents have also tendered an apology to the writ petitioner for the belated implementation of the interim order. In the circumstances, CC No.70 of 2005 is dismissed and W.P.No.6061 of 2003 is disposed of as not warranting any further orders. __________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 13TH AUGUST 2007 *TSNR