IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated : Nainital the 29th March, 2011 Order on the bail application of accused 1st Bail Application No. 230 of 2011 CRIMINAL SIDE Amit Garg S/o Sri Ram Avtar Garg, R/o Hanumanpuri, Muzaffarnagar U.P. …Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 544 of 2010 Under Sections 394, 120B I.P.C. P.S. Rishikesh District Dehradun Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Karan Anand, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. G.S. Sandhu, the learned Government Advocate for the State. In the same First Information Report, other co-accused have been enlarged on bail. The learned Government Advocate has made a statement that the applicant has a criminal history and therefore, his role is different. But the Court finds that other co-accused, who have also a criminal history, have been enlarged on bail. In view of the aforesaid, the applicant is also entitled to be enlarged on bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant be released on bail in connection with Case Crime No. 544 of 2010, under Sections 394, 120B I.P.C., P.S. Rishikesh, District Dehradun, on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 29.03.2011 SP