... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.635 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.635 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.635 OF 2006 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.2877 OF 2006 FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.2877 OF 2006 FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.2877 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri M.G.Barve for the Respondent No.1. Shri S.M.Vidyarathi for the Applicant. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : JANUARY 25, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 25, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 25, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates appearing for the parties. Application for delay is strongly opposed by Advocate appearing for the first Respondent. Considering the averments made in the Application, delay deserves to be condoned. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Place the Appeal for admission on 06th March, 2007. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE