C-482 No. 52 of 2004 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. By Way of this petition under Section 482 Cr. P.C., the petitioners have prayed for quashing the impugned summoning order dated 09.07.2002 as well as order dated 21.01.2004 passed by the revisional court in Criminal Case No. 2855 of 2002 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Roorkee, District Haridwar. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent No. 2 filed a complaint against the applications in the court of A.C.J.M., Roorkee on 24.06.2002, unde Sections 434, 437, 504, 506 of I.P.C. The learned Magistrate after recording the statement of the complainant as well as witnesses under Sections 200 and 202 of Cr. P.C. issued summoning order on 09.07.2002. Feeling aggrieved by the aforesaid order of the learned Magistrate the petitioners filed a criminal revision before the Additional Sessions Judge, Roorkee, which was also dismissed on 21.01.2004. Feeling aggrieved by the aforesaid orders of the courts below, the petitioner preferred this petition for quashing the aforesaid orders. Heard Sri S.K. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. Having considered the material available before me as well as arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, I am of the view that there is no flagrant injustice and abuse of process of court in this case. I am not supposed to embark upon an enquiry as to whether the evidence in question is reliable or not or whether on the reasonable appreciation of it, accusation would be sustained or not. It is the function of the trial judge where the evidence is yet to come and the matter is to be decided finally. I do not find any illegality in the impugned summoning orders passed by the learned Magistrate. I do not find any merit in this case at this state. Accordingly, the petition filed under Section 482 Cr. P.C. is dismissed in-limine. The stay order dated 17.03.2004 stands vacated. [ (B.C. K., J.) 20.02.2008 ASWAL