MC 106/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE D BISWAS, CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. A.M. Buzarbaruah, the learned counsel for the applican t Gauhati University. Also heard Mr. S.S. Dey, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1, Mr. B.D. Konwar, the learned counsel appearing for the res pondent No.2, Bar Council of India and Mr. A.K. Sharma, the learned counsel for the respondent No.3. By this application, the applicant is seeking clarification of t he direction contained in clause (IX) of the judgment dated 27.9.2006 in PIL 23 of 2006. The P.I.L. came to be registered in connection with certain deve lopments in Dispur Law College and this Court after considering the entire subje ct matter passed certain directions while disposing of the said P.I.L. Amongst the directions given by the Court, the specific directio n regarding the manner of holding Law Examination has also been given. The speci fic direction contained in clause (IX) is quoted below :- (IX) The Gauhati University shall henceforth, hold the law exam ination in different centres so that students of any law college do not appear i n such examination in their own college. Such direction shall be effective for a ll the law college in the State of Assam. It is submitted by Mr. Buzarbaruah, the learned counsel appearin g for the University that there would be difficulty in implementing the said dir ection inasmuch as in respect of some of the centres out side of Guwahati, the n ext Law Colleges in which Law examinations can be held are located at great dist ance. Accordingly, there will be serious dislocation and the examinees will face difficulties in commuting such long distance for sitting in the law examination . However, it is submitted that in respect of the law colleges in Kamrup Distric t, the necessary adjustments can be made to conduct the examination in accordanc e with the direction as indicated above. The learned counsels appearing for the respondents argue that th ere could be difficulties in respect of holding law examination in Law Colleges outside the Kamrup District. But in so far as Law Colleges in Kamrup District al l of which are located in Gauhati City are concerned, necessary arrangement can be made to comply with the directions which have been given in clause (IX) to en sure purity of the examination process. Having regard to the submissions made, it is considered appropri ate to direct that in so far as the Law Examination of Law Colleges within Kamru p District are concerned, the examination be held in terms of the directions giv en by this Court in order dated 27.9.2006 in P.I.L. 23 of 2006. In so far as examinations to be conducted in Law Colleges outsid e Kamrup District, it would be permissible for the Gauhati University to have th e examinations conducted for such Law Colleges as per their convenience, having regard to the relevant circumstances prevalent in the concerned Law College and the local area. But participation of external invigilators must be ensured where Law Examinations are held for candidates in their own Law Colleges. The above clarification is given in connection with the ensuing Law Examination scheduled to begin on 18.1.2007. The applicant is also given liberty to seek review of the direct ions given in the P.I.L., if so advised. With the above direction, the Misc. case seeking clarification i s closed.