IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 693 of 2003 (M/B) Ravadhar Gharkoti S/o Tirmiali, Village Tanda, District Champawat. ……… Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Secretary, Forest, Govt. of Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 2. Conservator of Forest, North Circle, Nainital. 3. Divisional Forest Officer, Champawat Forest Division, Champawat. ……… Respondents Mr. C.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttaranchal. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon. Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon. P.C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. C.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhasha Upadhyaya, Standing counsel for the respondents. 2. Mr. C.K. Sharma, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition, now, has become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (P.C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 10.04.2006 10.04.2006 G