AB 3293/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K. MUSAHARY Heard Mr. T.H. Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. P.P. for the State respondent. I have perused the C.D. in connection with C.I.D. P.S. Case No. 08/2011 u/s. 120 (B)/468/420 IPC as produced by the learned Addl. P.P. Assam. The Forensic report has confirmed that the accused petitioner put his signature on the document submitted before the bank in connection with obtaining the loa n. The matter relates to sale and purchase of land between the informant and the accused petitioner. It has been stated by the learned counsel for the petitione r that the informant is putting pressure on him as the informant is not interest ed now to sale the land although the agreement was made in this regard. The matt er is purely a civil dispute. In view of the above, I find that the accused may be enlarged on pre-arrest bail . Accordingly it is provided that in the event of arrest of the accused petition er who is apprehending arrest in connection with the aforesaid case shall be enl arged on bail of Rs. 20,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the sa tisfaction of the arresting authority subject to condition laid down u/s. 438(2) Cr.P.C. and also on condition that he shall appear in person before the I.O. co ncerned within a period of 7 days from today and he shall co-operate with the in vestigating agency as and when required. He is also directed to appear at least once in a fortnight for a period of two months from today. The bail application stands disposed of.