IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PIL Writ Petition No. 2121 of 2005 Shri Arvind C. Adarkar and Ors. .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. Dilip G. Bagwe for the Petitioners Mr. Ravi Kadam, Advocate General and Mr. R.M. Sawant, G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 5 Mr. K.K. Singhvi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. K. Setalwad with Mrs. Shobha Ajitkumar for the Respondent No.2 Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Meena Doshi for the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 Mr. A. Sayed for the Respondent No. 6. CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATED : DATED : DATED : 17.10.2005 17.10.2005 17.10.2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. After pronouncement of judgment, the learned Counsel for National Textile Corporation and the learned Counsel for all the Mill Owners apply for stay of this judgment and order. The learned counsel for the Petitioners strongly opposes. We do not find any ground to grant stay of this judgment and order, as all the constructions are in "standstill position" in view of the Stop Work Notices issued by the Mumbai Municipal Corporation and the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board. Hence, application for stay is rejected. 2. Issuance of certified copy of the judgment and order is expedited. (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)