IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 867 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1569 OF 2003 RAMCHANDRA GOVIND KOTTAWAR .. PETITIONER Vs. SOU. DROUPADI APPASAHEB DODMANI & ORS. .. RESPONDENTS Mr. R. S. Apte for M.S. Lagu for petitioner CORAM:-SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. DATED:-23/3/05 & 6/4/2005 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Respondent 1 is not served. Respondent 3 is served. In this civil application it is prayed that the petitioner may be permitted to serve respondent 2 by public notice in the newspaper “Mumbai Sakal” under the provisions of Order V Rule 20 of the C. P. C. The petitioner has filed an affidavit in support of this application in which it is stated that respondent 2 is avoiding service of summons. It is further stated that summons sent to respondent 2 is served by affixing the same on the door of respondent 2 on the address mentioned in the appeal. Respondent 2's present address is not available. In view of the above, civil application is made absolute in terms of prayer (a). Civil application disposed of. .....