THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR W.P. Nos.25392; 25395 & 25396 of 2009 Dated 24-08-2011 W.P. No. 25392 of 2009 Between: M/s. Aradhana Foods & Juices Pvt., Limited, Rep by its Finance Manager Mr. Ajay Kedia, r/o Somajiguda, Hyderabad. …Petitioner Vs. The Commercial Tax Officer, Somajiguda Circle, CTO’s Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and others. …Respondents W.P. No. 25395 of 2009 Between: M/s. Aradhana Foods & Juices Pvt., Limited, Rep by its Finance Manager Mr. Ajay Kedia, r/o Somajiguda, Hyderabad. …Petitioner Vs. The Commercial Tax Officer, Somajiguda Circle, CTO’s Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and others. …Respondents W.P. No. 25396 of 2009 Between: M/s. Aradhana Foods & Juices Pvt., Limited, Rep by its Finance Manager Mr. Ajay Kedia, r/o Somajiguda, Hyderabad. …Petitioner Vs. The Commercial Tax Officer, Somajiguda Circle, CTO’s Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR W.P.Nos. 25392;25395 & 25396 of 2009 Dated: 24-08-2011 ORAL COMMON ORDER: (Per: GR,J) These three writ petitions are by the same petitioner – M/s. Aradhana Foods & Juices Pvt. Limited, rep., by its Finance Manager Mr. Ajay Kedia, Hyderabad, challenging separate orders dated 06-11-2009 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Hyderabad, rejecting the revisions filed by the petitioner against orders of the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), LTU, Panjagutta Division, Hyderabad District, Andhra Pradesh, declining to grant stay pending the appeals preferred against the orders of assessment passed by the Commercial Tax Officer, Somajiguda Circle, CTO’s Department, Hyderabad. It is represented by Sri P. Balaji Varma, learned special standing counsel for Taxes that the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Hyderabad has passed final orders on 28-06-2010 in the substantive appeals preferred by the petitioner in respect of three assessment years – 2007-08; 2005-06 and 2006-07 respectively and therefore these writ petitions directed against the revisional orders declining to revise the interim order of the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Hyderabad declining grant of stay pending the substantive appeals, no longer survive for adjudication. Submission of the learned special standing counsel for Taxes that the substantive appeals have been disposed of are not controverted by or on behalf of the petitioner. In the circumstances, the substantive cause and the grievance in these writ petitions do not survive for adjudication. The writ petitions are accordingly dismissed as ‘infructuous’. No costs. __________________________ JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM ____________________________ JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR Dated: 24-08-2011 Pvks/*