IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC SATURDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2011 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32305 of 2011(K) -------------------------------------- PETITIONERS : --------------------- 1. VISHNU K, KAVITHAYODE HOUSE, KOTTAYI P.O, PULINELLI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. RAYYAN C.T., KERNAMKOTTE HOUSE, PUNNAYUR P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI. B.J.ABJITH SMT.SANDHYA RAMAN RESPONDENTS : ------------------------ 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 673 635. BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC FOR CALICUT UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DSV/- WP(C).No. 32305 of 2011(K) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS : EXHIBIT P1. COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 18.11.2011 IN RESPECT OF HIS 1ST AND 2ND SEMESTER (COMBINED) EXAMINATION. EXHIBIT P2. COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 18.11.2011 IN RESPECT OF HIS 4TH SEMESTER EXAMINATION. EXHIBIT P3. COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 18.11.2011 IN RESPECT OF HIS 1ST AND 2ND SEMESTER (COMBINED) EXAMINATION. EXHIBIT P4. COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 18.11.2011 IN RESPECT OF HIS 4TH SEMESTER EXAMINATION. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DSV/- ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 32305 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the examination was declared, they could not pass in some subjects in their Semester examinations. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge