CAW/228/2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.228 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3879 OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra, Thru’ the Executive Engineer, East Division, Nashik & Anr. ... Applicants V/s. Valmik Gangadhar Nagare ... Respondent Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP, for the Applicants. Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar for the Respondent. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE : 8 TH FEBRUARY, 2011. P.C. : 1. The applicants have filed the present Civil Application contending that the order passed by me on 22nd September, 2008 while admitting the Writ Petition should be modified. The learned AGP for the applicants submits that this would be necessary in view of the fact that the respondent was employed under the Employment Guarantee Scheme of the State of Maharashtra. He further points out that several orders have been passed by learned Single Judges of this Court in which such employees are not reinstated in service. He, therefore, submits that I should have followed the same precedent. CAW/228/2011 2 2. In my view, no modification of the order is required. A statement was made by the learned Advocate for the respondent that the respondent-workman has already been reinstated in August, 2000. This statement was not controverted by the AGP who appeared when the Petition was admitted. It is in these circumstances that I thought it was not necessary to grant any interim relief in 2008 as that would envisage putting the clock back by eight years which, in my opinion, was not appropriate. Besides, there are no changed circumstances necessitating a change in the order. 3. The Civil Application is dismissed.