MC 1534/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI Amitava Roy, J 02.06.2011 Heard Mr. S Shyam, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. DK Misra, learned A micus Curiae. The learned counsel for the applicant, while referring to the averments made in the application, has sought to impress upon this Court that the All Assam Layers ’ Association (for short hereafter referred to as the AALA) seeks to associate i tself with the proceedings so as to primarily highlight the essential perspectiv es of the legal fraternity represented by the various Bar Associations of the St ate for fortifying the exercise undertaken by this Court for ensuring the necess ary development of the infrastructure of the Sub-ordinate Judiciary. According t o Mr. Shyam, as the members of the legal profession constitute an integral and i nseverable part of the justice dispensation system, their contribution through A ALA would be constructive and in furtherance of the avowed objectives of the pre sent pursuit. The learned Amicus Curiae, while pointing out that the present proceeding is not adversarial in nature and that therefore the impleadment of AALA, as such, is n ot called for, has submitted that having regard to the spirit with which it seek s to induct itself in the present exercise, it may be allowed to intervene and o ffer its views so as to consolidate the measures as would be felt and exigent fr om time to time in the attendant facts and circumstances. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that having regard to the nature of the proceedings in hand, AALA may be permitted to inter vene bearing in mind its proposed contribution as projected before us. As this p roceeding had been initiated suo moto to promote and strengthen the infrastructu re of the Sub-ordinate Judiciary in all its essential aspects, its (AALA) interv ention is allowed in this perspective. The miscellaneous application stands disposed in the above terms.