IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 3116 OF 2007 (Jagannath Parbati Tale VS. The State of Maharashtra and ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. S.P. Urgunde, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for the respondent-State Mr. V.R. Sonwalkar, Advocate for respondent no.3 Mr. V.D. Hon, Advocate for respondent no.8 ... CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 14.09.2011 P.C.:- 1. By now, it is a settled principle of law that in service matters, Public Interest Litigations are not to be entertained. Reliance in this respect can be placed on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of "Girjesh Shrivastava and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others (2010) 10 S.C.C. 707". 2. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference. Writ Petition rejected. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M. T. JOSHI, J. ] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]