1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2250 OF 2009 Nitin Tanaji Bhosale .. Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondents. Mr.Deepak Shinde for the applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste A.P.P. for the State. Coram: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 25TH June, 2009 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.209 of 2007 of Agri Pada Police Station, Mumbai. The crime has been registered against the applicant and eight others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 302, 324, 326, 452 r/w 34 of IPC. 3. I have perused the FIR. The complainant is an eye witness. He has attributed specific overt act to the present applicant and also identified him in the test identification parade. According to the complainant, the applicant assaulted the deceased – Vikas Chavan initially with stick and thereafter 2 with stone on his head. The medical evidence supports the allegations against the applicant. In my opinion, this is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant on bail. Hence the application is rejected. While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. Application is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)