IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21551 of 2008 SARUNA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 18.9.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State as well as the learned counsel appearing for the informant. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Islampur P.S. Case No.32 of 2008 for the alleged offences registered under sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is the mother- in-law of the deceased. The husband and the father-in-law of the deceased are in custody. It is further submitted that the allegations are general in nature and there is no specific allegation against this petitioner. It is submitted that the allegation of killing the daughter of the informant is absolutely incorrect, which was not found true during the investigation. The learned APP on perusal of the case diary submits that it has come that all 2 the accused persons, including the petitioners used to make demand of dowry. However, the witnesses have not supported the allegation of killing the daughter of the informant. The learned counsel appearing for the informant submits that even though as claimed the petitioner is an old lady, but she is equally responsible for the alleged crime. Considering the above, let the petitioner Saruna Devi, in the event of her arrest or surrender in connection with Islampur P.S. Case No.32 of 2008, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)