n; •£ a ^-^- IJtTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.lP,TNo......Z..^>.»^>....../2007 PETITIONER; b^. y./ '(l^y / ^•,/Ar>/ %s? (r^' .,?'' A/' ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^,^> ^ .('• l^ Sobha Singh Mehra S/o Shri D. S. Mehra , Aged 42 ^year's Working as Asst. Teacher (Tribal Department) at Govt. Primary School, Rampal, Jagdalpur, Dist Bastar (C.G.) 2. Moti Ram Bandhe &/o Shri Dasrath Bandhe, Aged 40 years, Working as Asst. Teacher (TribaJ Department), at Middle School Mongrapal, Jagdalpur, Dist BastarfC.G.). 3. ^Jai Singh Kashyap S/,o Shri Dasmafh Kashyap, Aged 40 Years, Working as Asst. Teacher at Primary School sivnaguda, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.). 4. Dashmat Kuinar Kashyap §/o Shri Devnath Kashyap, Aged 39 years, Working as Asst. Teacher at Higher Secondary School Mooli, Jagdalpur Dist. Bastar (C.G.) 5. A. R. Das S/o Shri Mahadev Das Aged 39 ^' Years, Working as Asst. Teacher at Primaiy School Chokpar Jagdalpur Dist. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1., State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) l^- Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Departinent, Pt.Ravishankar University caxnpus, Raipur (C.G.) ^- Asst Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jagdalpyr Distt. Bastar (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF mPIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORAM ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER OF UKE NTURE ETC:- HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT MLASPW W. P.fS) No. 933 of 2007 Petitioners : Sobha Singh Atehra and others Versus Re^>ondents State of Chhatti^arh cnd o'thers SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Present: Mr. AAonoj Ch<ajh<m, Advocate for the petitioners. AAs. Oeepali Pcaidey, Panel Lawyer for State/req»ondents. /-. '•".. OR D E R (Passedon -this 2011' Day of February, 2007) 1. The petitioners were appointed in the year 1987 as Assistcnt Teachers on fixed pay scale of Rs. 300/-. After completion of one year probation, they were granted regukxr pay scale. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for -the petitioners submits Ihat the issue 'mvotved in •the case is asto whether, Ihe petitioners are entitted to regutar pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by -the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (AAadhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. A others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken-up to the Hon'ble 5upreme Court- m ^iecial Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition *»asdismissed by -the Hon'ble Supreme Courtuphotding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that -the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from date of initial oppointment. 4. Learned counsel appeoB'ing for the petitioners further submits that this Court-. while considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & others Vs. State of Chhanisgarh A others C4/.P. (5) No. 4725/ 2006) by order dated 1.9.2006, has gronted reguhr pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. 5. Leamed counsel appearing for the part-ies jointly submit that -this case is squorely covered by the decision of this Court in Ihe cose of Amar Sai Rom A o-thers Vs. State of Chhattisgarh A o+hers (5upra). ltj- ,m- \r 6. In view of that this petition is disposed of in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnifaotri Judge