IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.1677 of 2010(O&M) Date of decision: 9.12.2010 Tarlochan Singh and others …..Appellants versus Financial Commissioner and others ……Respondents CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon’ble Mr.Justice Augustine George Masih Present: Mr.Harpal Singh Sirohi, Advocate for the appellants Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) CM No.5080 of 2010 In view of reasons mentioned in this application, it is allowed and 60 days delay in re-filing the appeal stands condoned. LPA No.1677 of 2010 It is a fancy litigation between the co-villagers. The appellants have filed this appeal against an order passed by the learned Single Judge on 29.7.2010. The appellants are pressing for taking action against respondent No.6, who was Sarpanch of the village, by alleging that he had unauthorisedly occupied the Gram Panchayat’s land. The learned Single Judge has noted a fact that in an enquiry conducted by the Divisional Deputy Director, Department of Rural Development and Panchayat, Patiala, respondent No.6 was not found in illegal possession of any such land. Otherwise also, during the intervening period, respondent No.6 has ceased to be a Sarpanch of the village and thereafter re-elected as a Panch in the LPA No.1677 of 2010 subsequent elections. No plausible ground has been made to interfere in the order passed by the learned Single Judge. Dismissed. (Jasbir Singh) Judge 09.12.2010 (Augustine George Masih) gk Judge 2