IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.115 of 2009 SUDHANSHU KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 8.1.2010. I have heard Sri S.A.Najmi, learned counsel for the petitioner on this Special Leave to Appeal against the judgement of acquittal passed by Sri Vijay Kishore Chaudhary, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Hilsa(Nalanda) in Complaint Case No.577C of 2005 which is dated 10.8.2009. I have gone through the judgement. The learned Magistrate has acquitted the accused persons by extending the benefit of doubts to them. The reason for acquitting the accused persons has been discussed in the light of the evidence available to the learned Magistrate on the record of the case. There was solitary evidence in support of the charges and that was of the complainant P.W.4 who had admittedly filed a petition for dissolution of his marriage to Opposite Party Sunita Kumari which litigation he lost. But still the lady was expelled from her matrimonial house along with her children and the evidence showed that she was living separate from the petitioner. Witnesses have - 2 - stated that in order to further harassing the lady the complainant had filed a false case. There does not appear any perversity in passing the judgement of acquittal by the learned Magistrate which may require interference by me. In that view of the matter, the Special Leave as sought for is hereby refused. The appeal is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )