jpc ba607-11.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 607 OF 2011 Smt. Anju Omprakash Pise ... Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. S. V. Kotwal i/by V. V. Purwant, for the applicant Mrs. A. A. Mane, APP for the State Mr. Mangesh Desah-(I.O.), PSI, Narpoli Police Station present CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 22nd June, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. Pursuant to the directions given by tis Court on 17th June, 2011, the Investigating Officer is present. He has, however, not brought the case diary. I am shown a statement of one Mrs. Bharti Khade, recorded on 21st June, 2011. Reliance has also been placed on the printouts showing the telephonic contacts between Shradha Singh and Shivaji Singh co-accused in this case. Mr. Kamat points out that these documents are not forming part of the charge sheet. jpc ba607-11.sxw 2 3. It appears that some further investigation has been carried out after filing of the charge sheet and at any rate, the said documents which have been relied on by the prosecution do not form part of the charge-sheet. The Investigating Officer States that he would be filing additional charge sheet within a maximum period of 15 days. Under these circumstances, Mr. Kamat seeks permission to withdraw the Anticipatory Bail Application and submits that he would apply afresh to the Court of Sessions after the additional charge-sheet is filed by the investigating agency. 4. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such. 5. Liberty to apply afresh to the Court of sessions, after filing of the additional charge sheet. (A.M. THIPSAY, J.)