IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3928 of 2011 KALIM SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR -------- 02/ 18.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report nor anything was recovered from his possession. It appears from perusal of the impugned order of the learned Sessions Judge that the name of the petitioner came in this case in the statement of one victim namely Tuntun Poddar whose statement has been recorded by the Investigating Officer at para 3 of the supplementary case diary. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that one Ibrahim Mian who happens to be co-villager of the petitioner has inimical term and at the instance of the aforesaid Ibrahim Mian name of this petitioner has been roped in this case. It is apparent from the impugned order of the learned Sessions Judge itself that name of this petitioner came in this case when first charge sheet was submitted. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let petitioner, Kalim Sah, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in Gogri P.S. Case no. 62 of 2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)