ES ,..7^^ ^^^ <RV1 1OTT ^nt^T iPiN? ^^ ^WW^, W^\W^, [®j^ll^^< 'NSNd^ 'shNScfe" ^^!^f^ (^qi^q^) ?^?W ^ft^ W^I Sinflle Bench; Hon'bl W.PJc (Petition under Artici^ 226 of Constitution of Enciia) Fetjtioner :. M/s R.i^ Through: La! Khat Road, Rii Vs Respondents 22.6.2009 1. The [State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secr^tary, Nagariya Prashashan Vibhag, Manttalaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(CG) 2. The ^agar Palik Nigam, Ralpur Through its ChJef|Mun'dpal Offjcer,°Raipur (CG) slnce Mr. Y.C. Sharma, Adv. fo|- Mr. A. Das, P.L. for the Heard. By way of this petition th^ direction to the State Governm^nt of lease In favour of the petjtiorjier, before the various authorities sjnce matter is under consideratloih Government. He draws afrtentil Issued by the l^unicipai Corpor^tion Sangharsh Samiti in which it is] iease of 98 persons is pending Learned counsel for thel one of the said 98 persons and|this direction to the respondent pending within the specit]^ -^?^^-RR^r ^ fe^" IP •^^R^it?r e Justace Dhirendra Mishra N0.2S53/2009 Enterprises, A Partnership Firm, Partner Hitesh Kumar, S/Q Shri Mohan jja, Aged about 21 years, R/o Station ipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (CG) the petitioner. State. petltjoner has prayed for issuance of a to expedite the proceedinas of grant ', which accordlng to him, is pending last nine years and presentiy, the \¥ith the authorittes of the State )H of this Court towards memo/notice r^tion, Raipur to some member of Nagrik Imentioned that the matter pertaining to tefore the'State Government. Ipetltioner submits that the petitioner is petition may be disposed of with a atjthority concerned to dispose of the }ed peri.od. ^l-y^-i ^U^USS^^ <S-»{-li^(H—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000. .^..^..^s.-.aaa^, ^^^^,^»^^»«^5^^>^<^»»J«.^.^^.» :-^.,,.^ ^i^l ^? fqiiqi 'TOT ^^^ %»*ii^» V/ } ^ 'S^S ^ww<i, ©Ti1-y<i<o, [®idl^!j,< <? W %»*<8^ 3fI^T '<T^%t.(*^f^^T) I^IW^f?^ 3??^i -Z-- On the other hand, learnec is not aware about the pendenc^ State Government. However. if tl| State Government, they may b^ reasonabie period in accordance Considerina the facts and considering the submissions mac|e and after aoing through the rec<l direction that if any matter, pertai|iing of the petltloner. is pending beft)re shaSI be disposed of in accord^nce preferabiy within a period of sb certlfied copy of this order along jf the matter is already di( before the State authorities, this to the above directlons. Certified copy as per rulesj. abS^5.d41^ "Rl^f ^ fe^ TN^R ^'3TOH^ii^T counsel for the State submits that he of any such proceeding before the tie proceedings are pendina before the ^ directed to be expedlted within a l^ith iaw. blrcumstances ofthe case. particulariy |e by learned counsel for the petitioner |rd. thls petitlon is disposed of with a to grant of of land in favour the State Government. the same with !aw as early as possib!e< months fro.m the date of receipt of |vith copy of the writ petition. >posed of or the same Is not pending [order shall have no efficacy pertaining Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^l^-'l ^T4^!S<:^ <S^-i(^IM—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.