1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8481 OF 2009 Dagdu s/o Bhima Shinde, Age 52 years, Occu.Service, R/o Kawatha, Taluka Ausa, District Latur .. PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Department of Finance Mantralaya, Mumbai 2. The Collector, Office of Collector, Latur, District Latur 3. Deputy Collector, Office of Deputy Collector, Latur Sub Division, Latur 4. The Tahsildar, Tahsil Office, Ausa, District Latur 5. Assistant Labour Commissioner, Latur Division, Latur .. RESPONDENTS Shri R.B.Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.V.Kurundkar, Additional Government Pleader for respondents 2 CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ DATE : 22nd March 2010 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) 1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2. The petitioner herein has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India on the ground that though the order is passed by the Labour Court, Latur under Section 33-C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, the respondents have not paid the honourarium to the petitioner. The petitioner has also made an application/representation to respondent No.5 in this behalf but the same has not been yet decided by respondent No.5. 3. In that light of the matter, therefore, we allow this petition and direct the respondent No.5 to decide the application/representation filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks from today and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner. 3 4. Rule is thus made absolute on the above terms with no order as to costs. 5. Learned Additional Government Pleader undertakes to communicate this order to respondent No.5. ( S.V.GANGAPURWALA ) ( P.V.HARDAS ) JUDGE JUDGE (vvr/8481.09wp)