- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4993 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.4993 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.4993 OF 2005 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.S.R.Shinde,A.P.P. for State Mr.G.H.Keluskar for the Respondent CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : AUGUST 18, 2006. : AUGUST 18, 2006. : AUGUST 18, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates for the parties. Application is strongly opposed by the Advocate for the Respondent. The Respondent has filed Affidavit-in-reply. In view of the averments made in paragraph Nos.2 to 4 of the Application, there appears to be sufficient explanation for delay of 160 days. Sufficient cause is made out. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE