IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20691 of 2008 SURYADEV RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 04/08/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. The informant’s daughter was kidnapped by four accused persons, namely, Lal Babu Giri, Video Giri, Sanjeet Sah and the petitioner Suryadev Rai and the case was registered under section 366 A of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that they have taken away the informant’s daughter on a vehicle but subsequently she was found dead and section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added. The dead body was recovered from a well on the day following the occurrence. Submission is that the post mortem does not supported the prosecution version and time of death. The informant is the witness of the occurrence in which his daughter was forcibly lifted and carried away by four persons including the petitioner and Lal Babu Giri. Prayer for bail of the co- accused Lal Babu Giri has been rejected after perusal of the case diary. Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail in the court below after examination of the informant during trial. avin. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)