1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1189 OF 2009 Sadashiv S/o Kondopant Kulkarni @ Bhalerao. ... Applicant. Versus Hanumant Sheshrao Shinde & Ors. ... Respondents. -------- Shri. S.V. Natu, Advocate for the applicant. Shri. U.S. Mote, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 6. Shri. K.B. Choudhari, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent No.7 - the State. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL, J. DATE: 29th AUGUST 2009 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The applicant has satisfactorily explained the reasons for condonation of delay. The applicant has referred to the earlier proceedings of Criminal Writ Petition NO.542 of 2007 which was allowed to be withdrawn by an 2 order dated 10-2-2009. This Criminal Revision Application, according to the counsel, was filed on 24th March 2009. But, as the certified copy of th impugned order was not annexed, this revision application ultimately came to be filed on 8-4-2009. 3) The delay is therefore condoned. Application is allowed to that extent and stands disposed of. The applicant to serve copy of the memo of revision application on the counsel appearing for the respondents. (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ crapln.1189.09