CLCON 158/2008 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Sri Mangal Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri U.K. Uniyal, learned Senior Advocate for the respondent. By way of this contempt petition the petitioner has prayed to summon the respondents and punish them for their willful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 13-5-2008, passed by this court in W.P. 582/2003 (S/S). The relevant part of the order passed by this court reads as follows:- “prayer being innocuous is granted. The respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner by a speaking and reasoned order within one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order.” The counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent and Annexure-1 to the counter affidavit reveals that the representation of the petitioner was decided by the respondent vide order dated 10-7- 2008. As the order passed by this court has been complied with, I, therefore, do not find any justification to continue the proceeding of this contempt petition. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed. The notices issued against the respondents are hereby discharged. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) Dated: 16-04-2009 ISB