1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.1403 OF 2008 Mr.Bharat A. Sathe & ors. ..... Appellants vs. Sukhdeo G. Sathe & Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.Sandeep S. Salunkhe, Advocate for appellants. Mr.Surel S. Shah, Advocate for respondents. CORAM : SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED : 27th November, 2009. PC : 1. By consent the appeal is taken on board. Both the counsel tenders consent terms signed by the appellants, respondents no.1 to 7 and their respective Advocates. Respondent no.6 is a minor, aged 15 years. Respondents no.4 and 5 are his parents. Both the respondents have filed affidavit stating that the settlement of the dispute is in the interest and welfare of respondent no.6. Advocate, Mr.Shah has filed his Certificate that the settlement arrived at between the parties is in the interest and benefit of respondent no.6. Considering the nature of the dispute, the consent terms arrived at, affidavit of respondents no.4 and 5 and the Certificate of the leaned counsel for the respondents, this Court is satisfied that the settlement arrived at is in the interest and benefit of the minor, respondent no.6. The consent terms are taken on record and marked “X”. In view of consent terms 2 arrived at as regards distribution of the joint family property, the impugned order dated 8th April 2008 is set aside and the suit is decreed in terms of consent terms. All the parties are present in the Court today. (Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota, J.)