IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13213 of 2010 Between: Syed Abdul Hakeem … Petitioner And The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: None Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Home The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13213 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in acting on the petitioner’s complaints and in investigating the crime, as illegal and arbitrary. Both in the forenoon and again in the afternoon there has been no representation for the petitioner. I have heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and perused the record. The petitioner is the Managing Director of a public limited company by name SAH Industries (India) Limited. Respondent No.4 is a Full Time Director of the said company. The petitioner claimed that he has retired from the said company by filing Form-32 before the Registrar of Companies. He averred that on his retirement, respondent No.4 has taken over the said company. He alleged that as he was required to travel frequently abroad, some anti-social elements and rowdy sheeters have been storming into his office and residence in connection with the business of the above said company. According to the petitioner, certain criminal cases were registered against some persons, that he has filed complaints with the police for giving protection to him and his family and that the police have not taken any action. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner has not filed any complaint or lodged a report whatsoever before the police. Even in his affidavit, the petitioner has not mentioned the details of the purported complaints such as the dates on which they were filed. The petitioner has not filed even a copy of any of the complaints. This lends support to the stand taken by the respondents that the petitioner has approached this Court without filing any complaint before the police. For the abovementioned reasons, I do not find any ground to grant relief to the petitioner and the writ petition is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, WPMP.Nos.16662 and 16663 of 2010 are also dismissed. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 04.08.2010. ES