(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 7831 OF 2009 Limbraj s/o. Shankar Kute, Age : 65 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Songiri, Taluka : Bhoom, District : Osmanabad. .. Petitioner. versus 1. The Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad. 2. The Additional Collector, Osmanabad. 3. The Tahsildar, Bhoom, Taluka : Bhoom, District : Osmanabad. 4. The Gramsevak, Grampanchayat Songiri, Taluka : Bhoom, District : Osmanabad. 5. Anil s/o. Bhanudas Gavali, Age : Major, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Songiri, Taluka : Bhoom, District : Osmanabad. (2) 6. Pandit s/o. Ramling Markad, Age : Major, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Songiri, Taluka : Bhoom, District : Osmanabad. 7. Bajirao s/o. Eknath Markad, Age : Major, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Songiri, Taluka : Bhoom, District : Osmanabad. 8. Vanmala w/o. Dadarao Bangar, Age : Major, Occupation : Household, R/o. Songiri, Taluka : Bhoom, District : Osmanabad. 9. Tai w/o. Apparao Kokare, Age : Major, Occupation : Household, R/o. Songiri, Taluka : Bhoom, District : Osmanabad. 10. Bhagwan s/o. Ganpat Lokhande, Age : Major, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Songiri, Taluka : Bhoom, District : Osmanabad. 11. Vandana w/o. Subhash Kute, Age : Major, Occupation : Household, R/o. Songiri, Taluka : Bhoom, District : Osmanabad. (3) 12. Balu s/o. Limbaji Khodkar, Age : Major, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Songiri, Taluka : Bhoom, District : Osmanabad. .. Respondents. .......................... Mr. H.V. Patil, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. V.G. Shelke, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 to 4. Mr. V.A. Dhakane, Advocate, for respondent nos.5 to 8 and 10, caveators. .......................... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 26TH NOVEMBER 2009. COURT'S ORDER : 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 24th April 2009, passed by the Additional Collector, Osmanabad, in Case No. 2009/GB/DESK-1/GPN/CR-10, thereby rejecting the dispute filed by the present petitioner, under Section 35 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, challenging the "no confidence motion" passed against the petitioner on 4th March 2009. The (4) petitioner has also challenged the order dated 4th July 2009, passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad, in Case No. DB/Desk-2/ZPVP/Appeal/CR/23/09, thereby dismissing the appeal filed by the present petitioner. 2. In the light of the view taken by this court, in the judgment delivered in Writ Petition No. 4529/2009, dated 25th November 2009, no case is made out for interference in the concurrent orders passed by the Additional Collector and the Divisional Commissioner, thereby upholding the "no confidence motion" passed against the petitioner by a requisite majority. 3. Hence, the petition is dismissed. ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp7831