CF] •ZTO IN THE HON'BLE mGH COTJRT OF JUDICATURE. CHHATTISTGARH at BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION (S) NQ.1^27 2006. PETITIONER .A^ ^€ ^^yl. '-^^"^' ^f ^yvo?" <%• <^-" ^' D.B.K.Rao / S/o Shri. T. Annayya Aged around 62 years, Ex. BSP employee. Residine at: Qr. No. 6/A, Street-9,Sector-7, BHILAI-490U01 Tehsil and Dist. : Durg (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^<'sai 9rr*»^, <?"'^-—4.:?¥?a'"^, ff . »^*" "^!>.' ^ f^A ^r^ IzEz^n*'l ?ytpiB.,-,); , j, %^^':.y/ s%.,^r s's^ .^' ^ aR-SF^:; 1. The Maaagmg Director (SAIL),' Bhilai Steel Plant, Ispat Bhawan, BfflLAl - 490001 District: Durg (CG). 2. The Manager (Recmitment),' (Recmitment Section) Bhilai Steel Plmt, BHILAI-490001 DistrictrDurgfCG') WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY. MANDAMUS ETC, XI-HC-78 SD^TqiTR^icb ?Tan' ;3^?T ?hH v<- ./- c Soma *IIH(TTSt»Hra> 3^''<<i'i<icio, yttly'Ko, Ri<-iiyy r^^^.^o-uy'2WT2006 3ii^i ^aw (yfF^oi^tT) STtTTSRHf^cTSn^T 30-8-20<» l-1eard Mr. B.P. Rao, couns^l By the instant writ petition the petitioner has prayed that the| the petitioner's son for compassiojiate the petitioner on medical ground. The case of the petitioner Master Operator in S-10 Grade aif Subsequently, on medical ground| Unfit for the job by the Medical petitioner was dischaiged from basis, the petitioner submitted a his son. Even after the lapse of 3| oase ofthe petitioner's son Learned counsel for the of persons have been appointed of the petitioner's son is not directed to consider the represent^tion in the matter. Having heard learned petition and the documents, the reasonabte. Therefore, responderft submitted by the petitloner for order on the applioation consideri^g appointment of his son, in With the direction aforesaid, Parties are entitled for certif Of1 bei)^ fi<irn<fl-i *<ii?i1 ffte^t<Riwi< . S; srf^IT 311^1 for the petitioner. (jnder Article 226/227 of the Constitution of tndia, |respondents be directed to consider the oase of appointment on account of the retirement of is that he was employed as Chargeman-cum- |id posted in CRR & RED-1 of Bhllai Steel Plart. the petitioner was deolared Permanent IWedical poard of Bhilai Steel Plant. Based on that, the sfervice vide order dated 12-1-2002 and on that (jepresentation for compassionate appointment of yeare, the respondents have not considered ttie for conrlpassionate appointment. p^tltioner submitted that onsimilar ground number compassionateappointment, wherras, the case considered. Therefore, ttie respondents be of the petitioner and pass appropriate order coijnsel for the petitioner and having perused the dirayer made by learned counsel is just, fair and No.2 is directed to scnjtinize tiie representation appointment of his son and pass final the case of the petitioner for compassionate accorda|ice with the poticy of respondent No.1. the petition stands disposed of. corrlDassionate ied copy ofthis order. P.T.O. fy: