IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3694 of 2011 MD. FIROZ Versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH INSPECTOR ----------- 02/ 18.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the Union of India. Admittedly, at the relevant time, petitioner was driving lorry from which in huge quantity i.e.4468 kgs ganja was recovered. Although learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in follow up action, the house of the petitioner was also searched but nothing was found from his house and above stated circumstance suggests innocence of the petitioner and furthermore, petitioner has no criminal antecedent but I am not at all convinced with the summations of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Considering the above stated facts and circumstances, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with NDPS Case no. 86/2009 pending in the court of Ist Addl. Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Motihari stands rejected. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)