IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No. M-12527 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.05.2011 Daljit Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & another - ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present:- Mrs. Kiran Bala Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Latika Rao, AAG, Haryana. Kuldeep Kaur, respondent No.2 in person with Mr. Amrainder Singh, Advocate. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) By this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner seeks quashing of First Information Report (for short 'FIR) No.291 dated November 9th, 2004 (Annexure P-1), registered under Sections 420, 467, 468 & 471 read with Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC'), Police Station Parao, District Ambala on the basis of compromise (Annexure P/2) entered into between the parties. 2. Kuldeep Kaur, complainant - respondent No.2 is wife of Bhupinder Singh, deceased brother of the petitioner. She is present in person with her counsel Mr. Amrainder Singh. She has also filed affidavit stating that with the intervention of the relatives and friends, she has compromised the matter with the petitioner. Compromise-deed (Annexure P-2) has been placed on record. 3. Indeed, the dispute between the parties was of personal nature. In view of this, there should not be any impediment in allowing the parties to compromise the matter. Support to this view can be had from the authority 'Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab' 2008 (2) RCR (Criminal) 429, wherein, Hon'ble Supreme Court has ruled that in such type of cases, where the dispute is of personal nature, Court should ordinarily, accept the compromise. Criminal Misc. No. M-12527 of 2011 -2- 4. In view of above, petition is accepted. Consequently, FIR No.291 dated November 9th, 2004 (Annexure P- 1), under Sections 420, 467, 468 & 471 read with Section 120-B IPC, Police Station Parao, District Ambala and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 09.05.2011 som