THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.192 of 2005 JUDGMENT: When this revision came up for hearing on 04-02-2011, there was no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner-complainant and the matter was posted to 10-02-2011. On 10-02-2011, the matter was adjourned to 17-02-2011. On 17-02-2001 also, there was no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner, and therefore, it was directed to be listed on 24-02-2011 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. On 24-02-2011, at request, the matter was adjourned to this day finally. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ finally, today also there is no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner. It indicates that the revision petitioner is not interested in pursing this Criminal Revision Case. 3. Therefore, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for default. ____________________ B.N. RAO NALLA, J March 03, 2011 Pn THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.192 of 2005 March 03, 2011