IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2009 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 RP.No. 1146 of 2009(H) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.4062/2009 Dated 05/11/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- ANSAR M., ANSHA HOUSE, AKKOLIL, MAYYANAD, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ RESPONDENT(S): REVIEW RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS --------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 4. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LAND ACQUISITION NO.1, KOLLAM. 5. THE MAYYANAD GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MAYYANAD P.O., PIN-691 303, KOLLAM. 6. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL SECTION, MAYYANAD. BY SC PP THAJUDHEEN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J ........................................... R.P.NO.1146 OF 2009 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2009 ORDER The writ petitioner is the review petitioner. He says that the impugned judgment was issued on a mistake of fact in as much as none of the parties to the writ petition pointed out before this court that the Government have decided to drop or exempt the land of the petitioner from acquisition. The petitioner relies on Annexure A1, which states that certain lands will not be taken possession of. In the light of Annexure A1, all that is required is that the judgment sought to be reviewed shall not deprive the petitioner of any benefit of Annexure A1 or the decisions stated therein. Accordingly, this review petition is answered ordering that the judgment sought to be reviewed will not stand in the way RP 1146/09 2 of the petitioner enjoying the benefit of whatever is stated in Annexure A1, provided he is entitled to such benefit. The review petition ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE lgk/8/12