THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA Civil Revision Petition Nos.4496 and 4497 of 2009 Date: 18-9-2009 C.R.P.No.4496 of 2009: Between Atmakuri Narayana Balaji … Petitioner/ Plaintiff and 1. Rafia Sulthana and 10 others … Respondents/ Defendants C.R.P.No.4497 of 2009: Between Atmakuri Narayana Balaji … Petitioner/ Plaintiff and 1. Rafia Sulthana and 10 others … Respondents/ Defendants THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA Civil Revision Petition Nos.4496 and 4497 of 2009 Oral Common Order: Heard Sri T.S.Rayalu, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. Since both the revisions arise out of one Insolvency Petition and the parties being common, they are being disposed of by this common order. C.R.P.No.4496 of 2009: 3. This civil revision petition is directed against the order and decree, dated 22-7-2009, passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna district in dismissing the application I.A.No.623 of 2009 in I.P.No.91 of 2004, filed under Order XVI, Rule 10 C.P.C. and Section 151 C.P.C., seeking to issue summons to the Secretary, Gandhi Cooperative Bank, Vijayawada to produce the cheque bearing No.036113, dated 14-9-2001, before the Court for the purpose of comparison of admitted signature of the deceased Khaja Mohiddin. 4. The petitioner herein is the plaintiff and the respondents are the defendants in the petition before the trial Court. 5. Perused the impugned order carefully. I find no reasons to interfere with the same and accordingly, the revision is liable to be dismissed. C.R.P.No.4497 of 2009: 6. In view of dismissal of C.R.P.No.4496 of 2009, the present revision which is directed against the order and decree, dated 22-7-2009, passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna district in dismissing the application I.A.No.625 of 2009 in I.P.No.91 of 2004, filed under Order XIII, Rule 10 C.P.C. and Section 151 C.P.C., seeking to send the registered document, which was marked as Ex.A-1 in O.S.No.1502 of 2005 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, to that Court for the purpose of comparison of signature of deceased Khaja Mohiddin on Ex.A-1 and disputed cheque, which was encashed by the deceased, is also liable to be dismissed. 7. In the result, both the civil revision petitions are dismissed, at the stage of admission, confirming the impugned order. ___________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 18th September, 2009. Ak