1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6674 OF 2004 Shri Ramrao Tukaram Patil .. Petitioner Vs. The Asst.Commissioner of Labour & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.A.A.Garge for the petitioner Mr.Bhavesh Parmar for respondent nos.1 Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, A.G.P. for respondent nos.2 CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL & & & S.J.KATHAWALA, JJ. S.J.KATHAWALA, JJ. S.J.KATHAWALA, JJ. DATED : 6TH OCTOBER, 2008 DATED : 6TH OCTOBER, 2008 DATED : 6TH OCTOBER, 2008 P.C.: . The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions in the matter. Therefore, he may be granted time to seek instructions. On 18.8.04, when this petition came up before the court, the petitioner was permitted to amend and it was specifically mentioned that the matter be taken up for admission after the 2 Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Nashik decides the dispute as per the order of the court on 08.06.2004 in Writ Petition No.3998 of 2004 and the petitioner came to be adjourned sine-die. Thereafter, it appeared that the parties are not interested in prosecuting the matter. May be, that the matter stands resolved. Therefore, we dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. We make it clear that dismissal of the petition does not in any manner prevent the petitioners from seeking alternate remedy available to them under the law. ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( S.J. KATHAWALA, J ) ( S.J. KATHAWALA, J ) ( S.J. KATHAWALA, J )