KBP ca1976-10.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1976 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL [STAMP] NO.33220 OF 2010 (Yogita Vs. Vishvanath) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr.K.S.Patil, for applicant. Mr.Amogh Karandikar i/b.M/s.Khandeparkar and Associates, for respondent no.1. CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 21 st FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr.K.S.Patil, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.Amogh Karandikar, learned counsel for the respondent. This is an application for condonation of delay of 56 days in filing the Second Appeal. 2] Mr.Karandikar, learned counsel for the respondent no.1 submits that, in fact, there is delay of 150 days and not 56 days as claimed in the application. He submits that the impugned judgment and decree was passed on 22 nd July, 2010 and the applicant made application for certified copy on 28 th September, 2010. The certified copy was ready and delivered on 5 th October, 2010. In the application, no explaination is offered for not making the application for certified copy immediately after 22 nd July, 2010. He, therefore, submits that since no sufficient cause is made out, the application for condonation of delay may be dismissed. KBP ca1976-10.sxw 2 3] After hearing learned counsel for the parties, even if the respondents’ case is accepted that there is delay of 150 days, I am satisfied that the applicant has made out sufficient cause for condoning the delay. 4] For the reasons set out in paragraph no.3 of the application, Civil Application is allowed. Delay is condoned. No order as to the costs. [R.G.KETKAR, J.]