IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 1ST JANUARY 2009 / 11TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 38073 of 2008(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SIVADASAN, AGED 45, S/O. KUMARAN, KARUVAPPADY, PERUMKULANGARA HOUSE, MELOOR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SMT.PREETHY KARUNAKARAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE MELOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MELOOR.P.O, CHALAKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT 3. THE FOREST DEPARTMENT, REP. BY THE RANGER, EZHATTUMUGHAM FOREST RANGE, CHALAKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.DEEPA K.R THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C)No. 38073 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext.P6 order whereby the petitioner has been directed to stop functioning of the petitioner's small scale wood industry. However, from Ext.P6, I find that it is only a show cause notice whereby the petitioner has been directed to stop functioning of the unit or file objections if any. Therefore the remedy of the petitioner lies in filing an objection to Ext.P6 and take it to its logical conclusion. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as follows: The petitioner shall file objections to Ext.P6 within one week. Thereafter the 2nd respondent shall pass final orders pursuant to Ext.P6, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner within a further period of one week from the date of receipt of the objections. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs