IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5034 of 2010 1. GUDDI KUMARI W/O MAHENDRA PRASAD SINGH, W/O SANTOSH KUMAR, R/O MOHALLA - PROGRESSIVE COLONY (URMILA SADAN),P.O -T.V. TOWER, P.S - AGAMKUAN, DISTRICT - PATNA-26 Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION, PATNA 3. SECRETARY , BIHAR STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION, PATNA ----------- 2. 15.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It appears that the petitioner was a candidate who appeared successfully at the written examination for the post of Instrument Mechanic. She claims to have appeared at the interview but is aggrieved by her non-selection claiming that it was a single post for which she was the sole applicant. No allegations have been made in the writ petition whatsoever with regard to any illegality, irregularity or denial for consideration of case in accordance with law. Counsel for the Commission rightly submits that non-selection of the petitioner by itself may not be sufficient justification for interference in the writ petition. The Court is not persuaded to start a roving enquiry. 2 It appears that the petitioner has rushed directly to the Court. If so advised, she may represent before the Commission which is expected to apprise her suitably of the fate of the candidature. The application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)