/ 'jaUOISSIOIlUO^ +UD4.SISSV "£ (•9-3).indsD|g - ·us.iQ z ^y \^ :-g-3) oqjox - oa^io' iS • ^M/ ..f'"OVX'?^' /k^^ ^ A^^ .w ..-••^' J)<?'..• ^ •''» \^'-' .' / 6 ^ 4. ia i.v ayni.woianr do j.unoo HOIH SHS. w QA.'l ^ ^) PETETEON UNDER ARTCCLES 226 OF THE CONSTTT OF INDIA FOPR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WKTT (. MAN&MUS AND CERTCORARI ETC. OR DIRECTEON/ORDi OF LIKE NTURE ETC: - Petitioner : Ashok Kumar Jatwar Ver-sus Stat®of Chhattisgcrh aid otiiers SB: Hon'b!e Mr. Justice Satish K. Aflnihotri, J 1;' l' Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. '. Sushi! Dubey, 6.A. for the respondents/State. (Pa.ssed on 21ST Day of February, 2007) [. The petitionsr was appointed on 7/12/1995 as Upper bivision 'eache" on fixed pay scale of Rs. 1400/-. After compietion of two year probation, he was granted reguiar pay scaie of Rs. 1400- 2600/-. 2. Learned counsel oippesring for tiie petitioner submits that thiS issue involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioner is entitied to regulcr pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probdtion period. 3. The issue involved, herein v.'cs considered by the AAadhya Pradesh Stcte Admlnistrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers ars entitled to reguiar pay scale w.e.f. the dcte of initia! appointment. -£-- The matter was taken-up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Speciai Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition wcs dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers ar-e entitied to regular pay scafe fronn date of initia! appointment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner furthsr submits that this Court, while considering the same issue in Har Prasad Kurre and others vs. State of Chhattisgar'h & others {Vi/. P. (5) No. 5191/2006} by order dated 3.10.2006, has granted reguior pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. 5. Lsarned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that this case is squareiy covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Har Prascxd Kurre and others vs. State of Chhattisgarh &. others (Supra). 6. In view of that, this petition is disposed of in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge