1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9824 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO. 9824 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO. 9824 OF 2003 Shri. Krishnat Gopal Jadhav ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents None for the Petitioner. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, A.G.P.f or R. Nos. 1,2 and 4. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DATED : MARCH 03, 2006 DATED : MARCH 03, 2006 DATED : MARCH 03, 2006 P.C. . When the matter is called out, none present for the Petitioner. We find from the Prayer Clauses that the Petitioner has preferred review application before Respondent No. 2. That Revision application is in the nature of representation for reconsideration of the Petitioners case. If the representation is not decided, Respondent No. 2 is directed to dispose of the same within eight weeks from today. . If the Petitioners are aggrieved by the same, it will be open to the Petitioner to take steps in law 2 which he may be entitled to by filing a fresh petition. We make it clear that we have not decided the merits of the matter. . With the above observations, Petition disposed of. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.)