IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Cr.M.M.O. No.97 of 2011. Date of decision: 01.07.2011 Shakuntla Thakur … …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. … …Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Dev Darshan Sud,J. Whether approved for reporting ?1No. For the Petitioner: Mr.M.L. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr.P.K. Sharma, Additional Advocate General with Ms.Shubh Mahajan, Deputy Advocate General. Dev Darshan Sud,J. Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.17/2010, dated 10.12.2010 registered against her for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 401 and 120-B IPC by the Vigilance and Anticorruption Bureau, Solan. 2. Petitioner submits that no criminal prosecution can be launched in view of the decision of the Division Bench in CWP No.4121 of 2010 and bail granted to her by this Court. 3. I have gone through the judgment of the learned Division Bench whereby Hon’ble the Chief Justice has been pleased to direct that the representation filed by the petitioner shall be 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement?yes. 2 disposed of within one month and consequential action shall be taken by the respondent in the record of service book etc. of the petitioner within one week thereafter. 4. The enlargement of the petitioner on bail is also not disputed. However, at this stage, I cannot go into the finer details of the offences as alleged against the petitioner. Surely, the State could not prosecute her for offences which are not disclosed, or if this court has prohibited by its judgment as pleaded. It will be open to the petitioner to urge before the learned trial Court that no prosecution can continue or can be launched against the petitioner as the judgment of this Court does not permit such course of action. Petition disposed of. July 1, 2011. (Dev Darshan Sud) (aks) Judge.