IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17293 of 2010 NIMI NAT @ NAVI NAT S/O LATE BIRICHHA NAT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 30.08.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is named in the First Information Report which was instituted on 3.3.1990 but has been remanded in custody only on 13.1.2010. Considering the period of abscondance, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is rejected. The Magistrate concerned shall immediately commit the case to the court of Sessions and the Trial Court in seisin of the case will expedite the trial. However, if there is an inordinate delay in disposal of the trial the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail on consideration of age. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. ) 2