IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38393 of 2009 REENA DEVI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 28-Apr-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Nobody appears for the State. Petitioner has moved this Court for 2nd time for grant of anticipatory bail in a case under Section 304B on the ground that she is a lady and wife of the brother of husband of the deceased. It has been submitted that parties have compromised the case and as a result of which some of the co-accused have been subsequently acquitted after petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected by this Court on 17.7.2006. The earlier order shows that this Court did not grant the privilege of anticipatory bail even after noticing that she is a lady and that the parties have compromised the case. In such a situation the subsequent development is not of much use and it is not deemed proper to confer the privilege of anticipatory bail of an accused who has been avoiding to appear as a result of which the trial of the petitioner and that of husband of the victim lady had to be separated with the trials of others. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail is again rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner if she surrenders and seeks regular bail on all the grounds available to her under law. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)