1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.420 OF 2002 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.420 OF 2002 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.420 OF 2002 Indubai Nathu Genje .. Petitioner. Vs. Sakharam Housiram Karvande & Anr .. Respondents. Mr.V.D.Raut for the petitioner. Mr.K.S.Patil for respondent no.1. Mr.R.Y.Mirza APP for respondent no.2. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 27TH AUGUST, 2004 DATED : 27TH AUGUST, 2004 DATED : 27TH AUGUST, 2004 P.C.: . Heard Mr.Raut, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Patil, learned counsel for respondent no.1. and Mr.Mirza, learned A.P.P. for respondent no.2. 2. This revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.6.2002 rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No.309 of 1999 by which the respondent-accused was convicted of the offence punishable under section 324 of Indian Penal Code. However, instead of sentencing the respondent-accused to any punishment he was released on his entering into a bond of Rs.10,000/- on usual terms. I am informed that the 2 2 2 appeal filed by the State bearing Appeal No.1255 of 2002 against the impugned judgment seeking enhancement of the sentence has already been dismissed by the division bench of this court. Keeping that in view nothing further survives in this revision. The revision application is, accordingly, rejected. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)