IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4114 of 1999 KAPILDEO PRASAD & ORS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. ----------- 3. 04.03.2009 No one appears for the petitioners. Mr. Rajgrihar, learned counsel, appears for the opposite parties. From the order of the writ court, it appears that the petitioners were directed to file representation before the authority concerned ventilating their grievances that their cases were not considered for appointment on the post of constable for the alleged exemplary courage, they had shown in apprehending veteran criminal. The representation was directed to be disposed of by a speaking order. From Annexures A and B to the show cause it appears that the representation of the petitioners was considered and it was found that the claim of the petitioners that they had participated in chasing and apprehending the veteran criminal was not found correct. In that view of the matter, the representation of the petitioners was rejected. - 2 - It is apparent that the order of this Court has been fully complied with and, therefore, this Court is not inclined to proceed in the matter. The application, accordingly, is dismissed. B.T. (J.N. Singh, J.)