BEFORE THEHIOH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ( CHHATTISGARH 1 ^ c^^^ -,. / ^ONT^MPT EE^ETION . 2-lj^ / 22011 PETITIONER: •'^ ^> ^{^' >"S^....<'*1' ^<^^^\\ ^9^^^^'^ !^/'^Y Smt. Damyanti Mahamalla, W/o Shri S.D. Mahamalla, aged about 57 years,- R/o Village-Kolihamaar, Tahsil- Gurur, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS Shrl Ishwari Prasad Soni Chief Municipal Officer Nagar Panchayat Gurur, Distt. Durg (C.G.) ^, - ;©6^TEMPTPETITION UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPTOFCOURTS ACT, 1971. ^ RESPONDENTS CONTEMNOR M Itll MKV T ^T^?T "^T RI^^) <T8TT ^n^ST $r)*ii<st) Deepiil , <ixcj r<ii<)l<'l<l, yixfiy^Ko, Fs)dH^< ^..^^t£»^.C^.'^-^h' ll*«rllth*ira» ^TT^T 17^F ( ^C<I^<1^) 'P^nw 1pf?n 3:n^i SB^: Hon'bie Shri Manindra IVi 03-08-2011 Shri BP.Singh, counsel f<] This petitiori has been 21/10/2010 passed in W.P.(S) N Learned counsei for the the State counsel that the repre^ the writ petition was finaiiy disp^ matter wouid be decided Learned counsei for the petitioij the matter has not been decided it is ynfortunate that th4 However, in the absence of at contempt proceedings. The from the Court aiieging inaction. The petition is finaiiy disriosed ofr. cr>i^t<n4)rt 'HFI^ff ^f f^2ft <P»1^$H ^3?ifim3TI^?T jian Shrivastava. J. ^r the petitioner. | |led alleging wiilful disobedience of brder datec| jo.5999/10. |3etitioner sut?mits that on the statement made by tentation wouid be decided in accordance^with law, |>sed off and it was expected by the Court that the by the jauthority concerned within a period of four months. |ier submits that even after expiry of four months, hope expressed by the Court has been beiied: iy specific direction, 1 am not inclined to initiate pe1|tioner would be at iiberty to seek specific direction Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge s. ^iii IB :til® sas BISI KJBI i QS. » II;;-;M^r •:' ;ltiii' 1^^^;::' .^•^••^' fffv f;s'^ ^^^ r^w i%l 1.^-.••:;...''.':.:"~^. w^;^ MS^I^