IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATISGARH, ‘BILASPUR Review Petition - / 2010 Smt. Uma Bai d/o Jagannathiya w/o Dashrath Sahu, Aged About 51 Yrs, R/ o Village Mohtara, PC N0. 135 Tahsil Kasdol, District Raipur (C.G.) Versus Respondents / Respondents 1. Smt. Jana Bai D/o Applicant / Petitioner Kartikram Sahu, Aged awA‘H-W About 86 Yrs, R/o Vill. ‘§ $hl$w I s l-w‘” Kharkhod, Teh. & Distt. “'- Ianjgir (CG) 2. Jagannathiya d/o Panchram Sahu, Aged About 71 Yrs, R/o Village Mohtara, Tahsil Kasdol, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, Raipur APPLICATION U/O 47 R. 1 R/W SECTIONS 114 & 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 7% “mm/QwMMUHMHi zoo mm (Wu) WWW mm Wm B: Hon’ble Shri Prashant 19.11.2010 Shri Raja Sharma, counse for the applicant. Shri Vinod Tgkam, PL f0 the State. This application for modi lcation of the order dated 7/09/2010 in WP. No. 3713/2004 has bee preferred pointing out the ambiguity in the said order on the submiss on that though in paragraph 7 of the order it has been mentioned t at the impugned order is set aside, however in para 9 ofthe order it is mentioned that, “With this observation, th petition stands dismissed.” Contention of learned co nsel for the applicant appears to be correct. This petition for modifica ion is therefore allowed. In place of existing para of the order dated 7/09/2010 passe in W.P. No. 3713/2004, followi g paragraph be substituted, “With the above observa 'on, the petition stands allowed.” Registry is directed to c rrect all entries in the record of the court accordingly. A copy ofthis order be s t to the trial court. if” san- sham Kumar Misma Pra Judge w\\ S K ‘ ar Mishra J. d