WP(C) 2044/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. Y. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. R . Chakraborty, learned Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondent No.6 in issu ing NIT. According to the petitioner, the respondent No.6 has violated the laid down procedure towards accepting tenders without issuing advertisement in the ne wspapers. When the matter was listed on 7.4.2011, none appeared for the petitioner and accordingly the matter was adjourned to 20.4.2011. On 20.4.2011, a directio n was issued to furnish betters particulars relating to the dates when the NITs have been issued by respondent No.6 and also the dates when various settlements had been allegedly made by him. Today, the learned counsel for the petitioner pr ays for further time to do so. Considering the nature of the grievance, the writ petition is disposed o ff giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the higher authority, if he has any grievance due to the action of the respondent No.6. With the above directions and observations, the writ petition is dispose d off, without however, any order as to costs.