^ AMENDED WRIT PETITION IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.P.C. No...3.6..zf7'<^—../2011 FETITIONER: Mahanadi Education Society, (A Society registered under the Chhattisgarh Societies Registrikaran Adhiniyan-i, 1973) through the Secretary Shailendra Jain, office at C- 15, Shailendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. 2. All India Council for Technical Education, through its Member Secretary, 7th Floor, Chandralok Building, Janpath, New DeUii 110 001 The Central Regional Office All India Council for Technical Education Through the Regional Officer, Tagore Hostel-2, Shyamla Hills, Bhopal (M.P.) 3. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Technical Education D.K.S. Bhawan, Manta-alaya, Raipur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORAJ1! AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- PETITIONER HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0.3642 OF 2011 Mahanadi Education Society Versus RESPQNDENTS All India Council for Technical Education & Another (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Jitendra Pali, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri S.S. Rajput, Advocate for the respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 4 day of November, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of approval for establishing new Engineering College for the academic session 2011-12. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits thatthough the order has been passed by the respondent authorities in respect ofthe subject matter, but the same has not been Gommunicated to the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents sybmitsthat the expert committee report has been considered and the decision in favour of the petitioner has already been taken and the same has been put in the website, which can be downloaded by the petitioner, as is evident from the status note dated 8-8-2011. Copy ofthesame produc^d by the learned counsel for the respondents was taken on record. Thus, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication, as the prayer sought for by the petitioner in this petition was to direct the respondents to pass an order on the basis of report submitted by the expert committee. Thus, the petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. 'wyvi- s "•<; ^" ^w ki Gowri At this juncture, Shri Pali, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in this matter since an interim order has been passed by this Court, which has not been complied with by the respondent authorities in its letter and spirit and for the said action the petitioner has filed a contempt petition before this Court, which is pending consideration. Thus, the petition should be kept alive to ensure compliance of the interim order. The interim order has also come an end after the petition itself has been finally disposed of. Just to keep the contempt petition alive, this petition cannot be kept pending when the final order has been passed and the prayer sought for by the petitioner inthe petition has already been granted. As an upshot, the petition is liable to be and is hereby disrnissed as having become infructuous. - - Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge