FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1732 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.48 OF 2010. ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ We heard learned Counsel Mr. Amit Rajput (appointed). 2 Notice. The learned A.P.P. takes notice for respondents. 3 The Criminal Writ Petition No.48 of 2010 earlier was before this Court. The said petition was heard by this Court and order came to be passed on 3rd February, 2010. The respondents were directed to release the present applicant on parole leave as per Rules and the conditions, if any. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that accordingly, the applicant was released on parole leave. He was supposed to return to Jail on 9th April, 2010. Parole leave was granted by the Court taking into account the ailment claimed by the applicant in relation to his wife. Now, the applicant seeks extension of parole leave earlier granted. His application was considered by the respondents Request of the applicant for extension of parole leave has been rejected vide order dated 9th April, 2010 annexed at Exh.D to the application. It is passed by the Deputy Commissioner (General Administration), Office of the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad. With the assistance of the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for Respondents, we have seen the reasons recorded by the concerned authority for rejection of the extension of parole leave. The Counsel for the applicant points out copy of the certificate annexed at Exh.B (page 15). Undisputedly, the applicant was granted parole leave in view of the earlier order passed by this Court. We have considered the reasons recorded by the authority concerned. According to us, these reasons cannot be said to be perverse or illegal. The Criminal Application stands rejected. No order as to costs. We make it clear that the applicant, who is petitioner in the Criminal Writ Petition No.48 of 2010, may apply for grant of parole leave, in accordance with Rules and in that case, his application shall be considered by the authorities, in accordance with the provisions of law. (S.S. SHINDE, J) (S.B. DESHMUKH,J) 30.04.2010. kadam/*