WP. 2472-95 - 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 2472 OF 1995 Shri Dattatraya G. Kshatriya ...Petitioner Vs. Smt. Laxmibai P. Ghodke & Ors. ...Respondents *** None for the Petitioner. Mr. Prasad S. Dani, for the Respondents. *** CORAM: V. M. KANADE J. DATE : JUNE 6, 2011 P.C. 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner though notice has been served on him. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. Petitioner is the original landlord and the respondent is original tenant. For the sake of convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred to as the ‘landlord’ and the ‘tenant’. 2. The landlord had filed the suit for eviction against the respondents on various grounds. The trial court, however, dismissed the suit. Against the said judgment & order, the landlord preferred an appeal. WP. 2472-95 - 2 - The appeal, however, was also dismissed. Against the said orders passed by both the lower courts, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition. There is a concurrent finding of fact recorded by both the courts below. Taking into consideration the limited jurisdiction which is vested under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India, it will not be possible for this Court to take a different view by substituting the view taken by the lower courts. I have perused the grounds, which are raised in the writ petition. It is urged on behalf of the petitioner in the said grounds that finding of facts recorded by both the courts below were erroneous. As mentioned hereinabove, it will not be possible to re-appreciate the evidence and come to a different conclusion. Civil Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. [ V. M. KANADE J.]