VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 760 OF 2008 Ms. Bisman Kaur Sethi Petitioner Vs. The Registrar, Mumbai University & Ors. Respondents Mr. Deepak N. Sahi, for Petitioner. Mr. Rui Rodrigues for the Respondent. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI, AND A. P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE : APRIL 29, 2008. PC :- . The petitioner has failed in her examination and she has filed this writ petition seeking two reliefs. The first relief claimed is that the marks should be recounted as according to her in a particular paper for question No.6 she secured 9 marks but only 1 mark has been counted. 2. Even if this relief was given to the petitioner, even then she would not pass. But according to her, hereafter, the Vice Chancellor of the University should give her bonus mark and with addition of bonus marks she would pass. She had - 2 - claimed that she had obtained 9 marks in question No.6 on the basis of a photocopy of mark sheet which according to her was issued to her by the University. The photocopy was not even legible. We summoned the original answer paper and also the original marksheet. We have not found any mistake either in the marksheet or in the answer paper. As far as question No.6 is concerned, it is specifically awarded "01" mark. The total calculation is also correct. 3. In view of the above, this writ petition is misplaced and an attempt to seek undue advantage of the process of the court. And the stundents who have yet to start their long career cannot be encouraged to have a recourse to such processes for seeking undue advantages. The writ petition is dismissed with costs of Rs.5,000/-. 4. Original record of answer sheet and mark sheet is given back. Sd/- [ BILAL NAZKI, J. ] Sd/- [ A. P.BHANGALE, J.]