IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3293 of 2010 Mankeshwar Tiwary Versus The Union Of India & Ors. ---------------------------------- 5 28.9.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Senior counsel representing the Railway. Looking at the show cause which has been filed on behalf of the Railway it is not the duty of the Court to re-hear the matter and give a fresh direction upon the respondents in a contempt application. The Court is only required to see whether the direction of the Court has been carried out or not. If the petitioner is not satisfied he has remedy under law to challenge the issue in a fresh writ and the Court is not required to get the matter re-adjudicated or re-heard or re- decided in a contempt application. This contempt application is dismissed with the above liberty. RPS ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)