IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND SEPTEMBER 2010 / 31ST BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 9694 of 2010(J) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SEBASTIAN, KOTTOOR PADINJATTETHIL, FISHERMEN COLONY, ERAVIPURAM.P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL EXECUTIVE, KERALA FISHERMEN'S WELFARE FUND BOARD, M.P.APPAN ROAD, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, KERALA FISHERMEN'S WELFARE FUND BOARD, PONKUNNAM, THRISSUR-680 002. 3. DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE INSURANCE DEPARTMENT, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FISHERIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.ASOK M.CHARIYAN, SC, KFWFB R3 & R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. DILEEP MOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.9694/2010 J APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE 1ST PAGE OF THE PASS BOOK ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. P2: COPY OF THE DISCHARGE CERTIFICATE ISSUED FROM THE DISTRICT HOSPITAL, KOLLAM. P3: COPY OF THE DISABILITY CERTIFICATE DTD. 15/10/2004 OF THE MEDICAL BOARD. P4: COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE GROUP INSURANCE SCHEME. P5: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 25/10/2006 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P6: COPY OF THE ENQUIRY REPORT OF THE FISHERIES OFFICER MAYYANAD. P7: COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY KOLLAM CORPORATION. P8: COPY OF THE RELATIONSHIP CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE ERAVIPURAM VILLAGE OFFICER. /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 9694 of 2010 J ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 22nd day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T The diseased writ petitioner filed a claim before the first respondent which is forwarded to the third respondent. In this writ petition, what is sought for is a direction to the third respondent to pass orders on his claim. 2. Though learned Government Pleader contended that, the claim is inadmissible on merits, having regard to the facts of the case, I think it appropriate that the third respondent shall take a decision on the claim raised by the petitioner. This, the third respondent shall do, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. 3. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the third respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks