The Hon'ble Sri Justice R. Subhash Reddy Civil Revision Petition No.662 of 2009 Date : 27.08.2009 Between : 1.Minumala Raji Reddy and 2 others. …..Petitioners And 1.Bujugonda Srinivas and 3 others. …..Respondents Order : This Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the defendants in O.S.No.1021 of 2005 aggrieved by Order, dated 16th December, 2008, passed by the learned II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal, in I.A.No.1036 of 2008 therein. The petitioners herein are defendants in O.S.No.1021 of 2005. Respondent-plaintiffs filed the said suit for perpetual injunction and I.A.No.484 of 2007 for appointment of Advocate-Commissioner to demarcate and fix the boundaries of suit schedule property and Survey Nos.632 and 633. The said application was allowed and the Advocate- Commissioner has filed his report. Thereafter, the petitioners/defendants filed I.A.No.1036 of 2008 to set aside the said report on the ground that the same was prepared without any assistance from the Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records. The petitioners/defendants filed the said application mainly on the ground that in spite of their filing work memos to execute the warrant with the help of the Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records, the Advocate-Commissioner has executed the same without taking any assistance thereof. The said application was contested by the respondents-plaintiffs stating that the Advocate- Commissioner prepared the report in terms of order passed by the Court below in I.A.No.484 of 2007. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioners/defendants that the Advocate-Commissioner could not have conducted survey without any assistance from the Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records and that the Court below erred in rejecting I.A.No.1036 of 2008 filed by the petitioner. Even as per the averments made by the petitioners/defendants, the Advocate-Commissioner has executed the warrant with the help of a Mandal Surveyor. Therefore, the contention raised by the petitioners/defendants that the Advocate-Commissioner has not taken the assistance of the Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records is not at all a ground to set aside the report of the Advocate-Commissioner. If at all there are any objections to the report submitted by the Advocate- Commissioner, it is for the petitioners/defendants to file them and the same will be considered by the Court below at appropriate stage. In view of the same, I do not find any illegality in the impugned order passed by the Court below. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merits and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________ R.Subhash Reddy, J 27th August 2009 lur