1 S.B.Criminal Misc.Bail Application No.4782/2007 (Prem Raj Vs. State) Date of order : 25th September, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. K.L. Chauhan for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the order impugned and the challan papers. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that pendency of the cases cannot be a ground to deny bail to the petitioner. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that there are several cases of theft and house breaking are registered against the petitioner. He further submits that almost in all police stations of the area ten cases of similar nature in each of them are registered and some cases are pending trial. It appears that the petitioner is a habitual offender of committing theft and there are many cases registered against him at different police stations. 2 In some of the cases, earlier he was granted bail but he misused the liberty of bail and repeated the offences of house breaking and theft. In the circumstances, it is unsafe for the Society to release him on bail at this stage as there is every likely that if he is released on bail, he would commit such offences again, therefore, I do not find any good ground to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. vij