IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.5242 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.08.2011 Harbhinder Singh and others ... Petitioners Versus State Bank of Patiala and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Anand, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Anil Shukla, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ***** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? NO K. KANNAN, J. (Oral) 1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2 tells that subsequent to the filing of the writ petition on 23.03.2011, the petitioners have also filed an appeal before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Chandigarh and have obtained an order of status quo till the next date of hearing. Copy of the order passed on 08.07.2011 is placed before me. Since the petitioners have already resorted to an alternative remedy, there is no scope for entertaining the writ petition continuing the proceedings. 2. The writ petition is dismissed. AUGUST 08, 2011 ( K. KANNAN ) Rajan JUDGE