IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17753 of 2010 KRISHNA CHANDRA PRASAD, son of Late Sahdeo Shaw, resident of Village-Deochaura (Surya Kund), P.S.-Civil Line, P.O. Gaya, District- Gaya. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Labour Resources Deptt., Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Labour Employment and Training Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Munger. 5. The Principal, Industrial and Training Institute, Munger. 6. The District Provident Fund Officer, Munger. 7. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 8. The Treasury Officer, Gaya. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 27.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 28th of February, 2002 as a Fitter Instructor from Industrial and Training Institute (I.T.I.), Munger, he has not been paid the due amount of his pension, gratuity as also the commuted value of pension, which have been sanctioned by the Accountant General, as also some amount of group insurance, allegedly for want of “no dues certificate” and income tax details to be issued by the Principal, I.T.I. It is further submitted that the petitioner has not been paid the provident fund amount. Learned counsel for the State submits that the matter needs to be verified from the record. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the - 2 - petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the aforesaid grievances, the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the Principal, Industrial and Training Institute, Munger (respondent no.5), with a copy to respondent no.2, 3, 7 and 8. With regard to the claim for provident fund, the petitioner also proposes to file a separate representation before the District Provident Fund Officer, Munger (respondent no.6). In case such separate representations are filed stating the details of his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representations shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representations, so that the respective grievances of the petitioner may be settled and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules without further delay. Upon consideration, “no dues certificate”, if required, be issued accordingly, so that the sanctioned amount of pension and gratuity would be paid. However, if for any reason, “no dues certificate” for want of any information from the petitioner is not issued, the same may be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)