Q 'fr- i.'OTs Single Bench "!S p^g IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATriSGARHl W.P. (S) No. 5-?6/ /2009 PETITIONER b^ ^.^^ ....;;^ ^^•^%) AS -y^ y ./••' ^:<l-' ^f,'-' <^"^ " <&'~". . ^^••" {>»tf'~ RESPONDENTS: < """"!? 6. . S.R ^S.C.S. Yadav, S/o. Late D.S. Yadav, aged about 53 years, worbing as tocharge Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering Service, Korba Division, Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS (1) State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development, D. K. S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). (2)' Chief Engineer, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Rural Engineering Service, Vikas Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) (3) J. L. Patanwar, working as Sub Divisional Officer, Rural Engineering Service, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226_OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA c—n 9>P1 sStT'iSl R-ii+ 'sTi'ii str^i w*)N 'S^ "yi-4lcl'4, tSiil'M'is, fsi<niyt|< .!:i&.X.S^.-.......2^A.l, "^" afl^T1^'^ (1^3^t't) ^200-' ^wiwtifCTsn^i SB : HON'BLB SHRI JUSTICB PRtTINKER DIWAKBR 30.07.2009 Shri P.S.Koshy, counsel for Shri Shashank Thakur, P.L\ Challenge in the present| 29,6.2009 passed by the respond] No.3 has been posted in place of tl^e petitioner as In charge Executive Engineer. Contention of counsel for tH senior to respondent No.3 and no him. He further submits that in Oovemnient, his junior cannot be •!Frqf frT'WWTftt feiZt •rf3TRTC ^sffiman^i he oetitioner. for the State. petition is to the order dated ;nt No.l by which the respondent petitioner is that the petitioner is jirder has been passed in respect of view of the circular of the State t)osted above him and therefore the order impugned is bad. Counsel for the State subnjiits that let the petitioner make a representation to the respondent N[3. 1 and the saine would be decided in accordance with law. Counsel for the petitioner However he submits that till hi jagrees to make a representation. js representation is decided, the petitioner may be given some prote^tive order. Accordingly, the petition is ^iisposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a representatioiji within a period of ten days froin the date of receipt of the copy c^ this order, the same would be 1 decided by the authorities concerr|ed within a period of three weeks from the date of its receipt. Till theh the impugned order shall not be given effect to. | - - - - - - - - - - -- - Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge •Tf^ I.