1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4197 OF 2005 IN APPEAL (LODGING) NO.982 OF 2005 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.544 OF 1990 Shri Rameshchandra Tara Appellant vs. Hemant Kumar & Co. & anr. Respondents Mr.Milind Vasudeo i/b.M/s.Khaitan & Jayakar for the appellant. Ms.Pallavi Dedhia i/b.M/s.Sanjay Udeshi & co. for the respondent no.4. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 6th February 2006 P.C. Heard Mr.Vasudeo, the learned counsel for the appellants. 2. The appeal suffers from delay of 19 days. 3. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the notice of motion, we are satisfied that delay is sufficiently explained. 4. We, accordingly, condone the delay in filing the 2 appeal. 5. Office to process the appeal and post it for admission as soon as numbered. 6. Notice of motion stands disposed of. (R. (R. (R. M. LODHA, J.) M. LODHA, J.) M. LODHA, J.) (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)