( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3049 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3049 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3049 OF 2005 IN IN IN APPEAL NO.569 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.569 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.569 OF 2005 IN IN IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.582 OF 2004 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.582 OF 2004 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.582 OF 2004 IN IN IN SUIT NO.1199 OF 2001 SUIT NO.1199 OF 2001 SUIT NO.1199 OF 2001 Mohamed Farid Abdulla Saudagar .. Appellant V/s Siraz Abdul Hussein Contractor, & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Aniruddha Garge for the Appellant. Mr.S.W.Kulkarni for the Respondents. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 21.10.2005. DATE : 21.10.2005. DATE : 21.10.2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. This Court has been repeatedly granting extentions to the Appellant to enable him to deposit the royalty amount. Inspite of the same, consistently, the Appellant has been defaulting. As of today, there is a liability of over Rs.2,70,000/- by way of arrears of royalty. The learned Counsel for the Appellant states that the Appellant will not be able to deposit even an amount of Rs.1 lakh within a period of one week from today. Under these circumstances, we cannot keep on extending the time. Hence, Notice of Motion stands dismissed. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)