1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Contempt Petition No.98 of 2010 In Writ Petition No.3688 of 2006 (D) (Pradumn s/o Haribhau Kukde v. Shri Sudhir Thakre and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri Piyush P. Pendke, Advocate, holding for Shri M.M. Sudame, Advocate, for Petitioner. Coram : K.U. Chandiwal, J. Dated : 21 st June, 2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. By virtue of the order dated 15-7-2008, while entertaining Writ Petition No.3688 of 2006, this Court found that the three representations/communications were not considered and hoped from the Collector to consider the case in accordance with law. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of there being further representation dated 30-7-2008 and 17-11- 2008, there is no positive response. Since there was no time-frame mandated by this Court, the delay is apparently demonstrated. However, the learned Collector or the other respondents shall look into the matter in the light of the representations made by the petitioner on their own merits. For the present, no violation of any order of this Court is 2 found. The contempt petition is, therefore, dismissed. Judge. pdl.