c5^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATnSGARH) W.P.fSlNo. V\&.^- f 2009 PETITIONER ^ ..• -^^ ^^xy'" Racaesh Kashyap, S/o. L. R. Kashyap, aged about 35 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, Primary School Gudhinelpara, Sukma, R/o. Gandhi Nagar, Sllkma, Distt. Dantewada (C.G.) ^^ VERSUS A^ RESPONDENTS: (1) State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough its Secretaiy, Tribal WeHare Department, D. K. S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). (2) ^"Assistant Cominissioner, Tribal Developraent Departinent, O/o. of CoBector, Tribal Development, Distt. Dantewada (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF rrtt^^ TS^e^t-^ —78 SII^I W h-V'h ^IT STT^T sti^ll* 'S^I ^WM^, 8'Tll'M'Ko, (qCTiyy,< M:.S:...^1......^.^~]..'3. aii^r TI^T ('^ig^t) ?K(W flfen 3Ti^?f » 'Uilr^W>0*T l? <EU"f3T .'S'TT<GyTlT(^S?t tt^TT' • XV,\/W SS^i^SSi OrSISJfc UUiSkt^HrEs ITIMI, AWniJB( 12.8.2009 Shri Vinod Deshmukh, cc|unsei for the apphcant. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, G.A. Chalienge in the preseht petition is to the order dated 30.6.2009 (Annexure P/1) passj petitioner who is working as transferred from Middle S'cl Dantewada at the ootion d: Development Biock Bijapur. Contention of counsel for| Upper Division Teachers is beinj petitioner has been transferred and on account of shiftine of adversety ati'ected. Contention of counsel fo However he submits that tili petitioner may be given some prcjtective order. Accordingly, the petition petitioner to make a representa.il the date of receipt of the cop}| then the impugned order shall n' <+l*(f<r(^tl1 ^wv^ ^f fel^t <^(^.K ^ sifiiH an^i br the State. id by respondent No. 1 by which the Upper Division Teacher has been lool Gudmeltara, Sukma, Distt. Assistant Comraissioner, Tirbal the petitioner is that the seniority of maintained district wise whereas the froin one district to another district the petitioner, his seniority will be t the State is that let the oetitioner raake a representation to the resbondent No. 1 and the same would be decided in accordance with law. Counsel for the petition^r agrees to inake a representation. his reDresentau'OR is decided, the |s disposed of with a direction to the |ion within a period of ten days from of this order, the same wouid be decided within a period of three -freeks from the date of its receipt. Tili j)t be given effect to. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge •e *A-