$0 H§GH C$URT OF CHHéTTlSGi§RH: ELASPUR Writ Pé‘ti‘tian {S} M). 5531 0f 23$? Petiticner Sarsawati Bai. Wis. Shri :twar Sinqh, Aaed abcut 2.7 wars PM Véiiagn Qatra (Scasaré), Versus Respondents 1) Women State of Chhaitisgam and. chiare'n Woug‘w \Kjeifarei Departme’rt mks. of Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raépur (CG). 2) The Proiect Ofmer Chud Weifare Project, Paii D§stiict Kama (CG). 3) Smt. Sushiia 8m, Wlo. Shri Amar Singh, Aged amut 22 years, Rio. vmage Batra (Sonsari; Tam“ & Distréct Korba (CG). (Writ Petition under Article 226 0f the Constitution of indéa) SB: Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihom, J. Present: Shri Ashok Patel, oounseiforthe petitioner‘ 8hr: A~.d Dubey, Pane: Lawverforthe Siam ORAL ORDER 1;?assgd on 14‘“ January; 2938) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to make an application before the Coileotor for deciding the representations dated 28—12-2006, 52—2007 (Annexure PIBL 2-1-2007 (Annexure PM) and 25-6-2007 (Annexure Pm filed by the petitioner for expeditious dispose}. 2) This Court cannot direct a iudiciai/quasi judiciai authority to pass an order in a partiouiar manner. The petitioner is at iiberty to make an appropriate application before the concerned authority for consideration, in accordance with iaW. 3i The petition is acoordinoiv dismissed. Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge raju r" 2