IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 17TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 26TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 18064 of 2009(C) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- LATHIKA RAGHU, MATHENA PARAMBIL, MANJUMMEL, ELOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.MUHAMMED HANEEFF RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS DGM& PROJECT DIRECTOR, PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, 29/1298 A MANGALA VALIYA MADOM, VYTTILA, KOCHI -19. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REP BY ITS SCRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 BY ADV. MR.THOMAS ANTONY R2 & R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. M.P.SREEKRISHNAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.18064 of 2009-C = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 17th day of November, 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioner claims a benefit of rehabilitation package in connection with the acquisition of land for the purpose of Vallarpadam Project. The controversy revolves on the question as to whether the petitioner has demolished the entire structure that he had to pull down to enjoy the benefit of rehabilitation project. While the petitioner asserts that he has done so, the official respondents stand to say that the entire structure has not been pulled down and that the respondents do not have any objection to extend the benefit of rehabilitation project, the moment the entire structure is pulled down. Recording this submission, it is ordered that the RDO having jurisdiction over the area, will inspect the site and if the entire structure has been WPC18064//09 -: 2 :- pulled down to the satisfaction of the officers, including the RDO, the petitioner will be given the benefit of the rehabilitation project. Let this happen within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/2811