IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5363/2008 {Ram Niwas & Another Versus The State of Rajasthan & Others} Date of Order :: 3rd July, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. G.S. Bapna for the petitioners BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The writ petition is directed against the impugned order dated 8th December, 2003 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Beawar which has been affirmed by the Revenue Board vide order dated 25th February, 2008 (Annexure- 4) whereby the trial court allowed the application of plaintiff under Order 8 Rule 9 CPC permitting him to file rejoinder on record. The grievance of learned counsel for the petitioners is that trial court did not assign any reason for taking rejoinder on record. 3. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners in the light of order passed by the trial court which has further been affirmed by the revenue board and after considering the same, I do not find any jurisdictional error in the order passed by -2- the trial court so as to interfere with the said order. 4. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR S.B. Civil Misc. Stay Application No. 1115/2008 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5363/2008 {Ram Niwas & Another Versus The State of Rajasthan & Others} Date of Order :: 3rd July, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. G.S. Bapna for the petitioners Upon dismissal of writ petition, the stay application does not survive and it also stands disposed of. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK/-