CRLMP2025/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. Petition No.2025/2010 Mohammad Khalid Vs. State of Rajasthan through P.P. And Another Date of Order ::: 01.11.2010 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Surendra Singh Shekhawat, Counsel for petitioner Shri Peeyush Kumar, Public Prosecutor #### By the Court:- This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by petitioner assailing order dated 28.07.2010 of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.8, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Case No.278/2007 and order dated 18.08.2010 of learned Additional Sessions Judge (FT) No.2, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Criminal Revision No.94/2010. Petitioner had requested that standing warrant issued against him by the court on 31.03.2010 be converted into bailable warrant but his request was rejected by the first court and thereafter revisional court also rejected his revision petition. Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that petitioner has been falsely implicated as accused in the matter. His correct name is Mohammad Khalid whereas complaint is being proceeded against Mohammad Khalik and that petitioner has also filed counter complaint. It is CRLMP2025/2010 // 2 // contended that petitioner had engaged a counsel and he went to the Court on certain dates when he was called by counsel Tara Shanker; on 16.05.2010 he went to Court and paid to him a sum of Rs.1000/- as expenses; learned Advocate, however, did not produce him before the Court, and therefore he should not be penalized for that. He went to attend the court on subsequent dates also to inquire about the matter. Petitioner is ready and willing to appear before the Court. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the petition. Considering all facts and circumstances of case and willingness of petitioner to appear before the court concerned, I direct that standing warrant issued against petitioner be converted into bailable warrant. Petition is directed to appear before the court on 22.11.2010. The said court shall execute such bail bonds and sureties etc. as be directed by said Court. Petition is accordingly disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//