1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6925 OF 2008 Smt Vaishali Yogesh Khondre .. Petitioner Vs M/s Shri Krishn Farm and ors .. Respondents Mr.Vijay Killedar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.N.Ghotekar, for Respondent no.2. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 30/11/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Rule. By consent, rule made returnable forthwith. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents waives service. By consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2. This petition is directed against the two orders dated 18.12.2007 and 9.9.2008 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaisingpur, Dist-Kolhapur in Motor Accident Claims Petition No.55 of 2007. The petitioner-claimant had filed an application on 9.9.2008 at Exhibit-40 for setting aside ‘no say’ order passed by the Tribunal on 18.12.2007. On that T 2 application, as a matter of fact, respondent nos 4 and 5 had given no objection. Respondent nos 4 and 5 are the claimants in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.55 of 2007. Mr.Ghotekar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company, also has no objection for allowing the petitioner to file her say in MAC No.55 of 2007. It appears that in MAC No.55 of 2007 respondent nos 4 and 5 have challenged the status of the petitioner as a wife of the deceased in the accident. Considering overall facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, I deem it appropriate to make the rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (b) and allow the petitioner to file her say within a period of six weeks from today. The Tribunal shall thereafter proceed to hear and decide the claim application expeditiously. Rule is accordingly made absolute. No costs. (D. B. Bhosale, J.) 3