IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17401 of 2011 Rajesh Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 24.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 406, 420 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioner that he received Rs. 75,000/- for installation of mobile tower on the land of the informant but neither any mobile tower was installed nor the money was returned. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner constructed his residential house in the year 2006 for which he borrow Rs. 25,000/- from the informant and promised to return the said money within three months but the petitioner could not return the money within said period, petitioner returns the money on 10.03.2008 and 15.05.2008. When informant demanded 2 interest and on refusal of the interest the present case has been lodged. There is nothing on record to suggest payment of Rs. 75,000/-. It is submitted that petitioner is not connected with any mobile company. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No. 06 of 2009 arising out of Complaint Case No. 3067 of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)