Crl. Misc. No. M-19499 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-19499 of 2009 Date of Decision : August 19, 2009 Saudagar Singh .... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG, Punjab. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Learned State counsel, on instructions from Head Constable Balbir Singh, states that pursuant to interim order of this Court, the petitioner has since joined investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner as lambardaar only attested the sale deed and there is no allegation that the vendors were impersonated. On the other hand, the sale deed was executed by the vendors, by whom it purports to have been executed. The dispute is regarding identity of the property, which was allegedly purchased by the vendee and the property which was mortgaged by the vendee with the bank for raising loan. It is further contended that the petitioner has nothing to do Crl. Misc. No. M-19499 of 2009 2 with the identity of the property. In view of the aforesaid, without commenting anything on merits, interim order dated 21.07.2009 is made absolute. This order shall remain effective till one month after the filing of the charge-sheet by the police or till decision of regular bail application of the petitioner, which ever is earlier. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. August 19, 2009 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE