IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1013 of 2008 RAM NARESH PRASAD SINGH Versus UMESH PRASAD SINGH @ UMESH PRA ----------- 2 17/7/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for opposite party no.1. In the opinion of this Court the court below has not committed any jurisdictional error in rejecting the application of the petitioner, whereby and whereunder, he had sought to delete the names of opposite party nos. 5 to 8 on the ground that they did not contest the matter under section 9 of the Land Acquisition Act. Section 19 of the Land Acquisition Act read with section 18 of the Act would make it clear that the names of the persons whose interest is found in the land, will be incorporated by the Collector in his comprehensive report by making a reference. Thus, when the names of the opposite party nos. 5 to 8 were mentioned therein it does not lie in the mouth of the petitioner now to select the party or to delete the party as per choice. There being no error in the impugned order, the same is hereby dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. ) Abhay Kumar