CLCON No. 37 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. A.K. Pandey, Advocate for the applicant. The applicant has filed the present contempt application alleging non-compliance of the order of the writ court dated 09/06/2004 whereby the Court directed the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service. The Court finds that the said order dated 09/06/2004 was subsequently modified by an order dated 28th August, 2004 to the extent that if any post was available, then the applicant would be accommodated. More than six years has elapsed and this Court is of the opinion that in view of Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, no proceedings can be initiated against the opposite parties on this belated stage coupled with the fact that there is nothing to indicate that cause of action continuing even after the passing of the order. The contempt application is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 13.04.2010 Shiv