Jumcuruna M uILuwun (um) IN mi HIGH COURT 3F g. p .zao .\ki,‘(\/La§ 26g. ig L§xmi Rarayan Pan ey 5/0 Sri.Gangar&m Panéay’, $ged abaut 4U yaars,Uppar Divi- 5Laa ?&mche5 i Saut, High School at Pit5a.319ck git aata,ra5idant a? Village Garhphuljhar via aaana,015tsmahasamund, ($.5.) 2a Ghanauram Sahu S/a Sri.$irama1 Sahu,agal $huut 43 yaars,Uppar Division Teachar in Gevt. Higher,$a:anday Schaol Jhalap,81aak mahagamund9residant at villaga Ghonch Via Pithaora,District Mahasamund(C.G.) u Hsmaram Chandrakar S/O SrinHhukhan Lal, aged abuut.51 yaar&,Uppar Diuiaion Teacher i Gavtc middla Sahael Haghibahara,alock Bagbgharagasidant’gf’ Villaga Ghuchapali, P.8g3agnahara,0iatrict nahasamund(C.G,) ulsl Rana 5X0 SrigSakirtan Rana” agmg $3 v&ar39ug§$r Qiwiaicn V” ”% A ém G$wtg Higher¥5£cendary Schcnl Garhphulgharg Black Baaana,ra31d8nt a? viliage Tashgaan, Tehsil Saraypali,District Hahasamund(C.G.) 5. Aksay Kumar Pradhan 5/0 5ri.Sadan Pradhan, agad about 43 years, Upper Division Taachar ;§n Govt. Higher Sacondary Schaol pithaara, residant cf Village Kisanpur,via Pithanra, District Nahasamund (C.5.) g Praruila Kumar ?radhan 8/0 Sri.Harayan Pra~ dhan,agad about 43 years;‘Upper Division g§§acher in Guvha Higher Sacondary Sthoal 9 Di$trict mahasamund (£.G;) 7. Vimal Kumar mannanay S/D SriaSubhanikram égeé abaut 3§ yaars,Upper Giwision Tsachar Guvt9 Higher Secondary Schaok Jhalap,rasiu éent a? GhandarigP!D.Paraga0n,£3iatrict Maha5amun§ (E‘S,) 'Q2“«g Pykin,8IGCR Saxaypali,rgsidant OF Tashgaan, .. § ' / & s 8. Upendra Baghel 5/0 Sri.5akirtan Baghel, aged abaut 35 years,Upper Divisian Tea: char in Gavt. Middle Schaol Gaébeda,alnck Pithaura,resident a? Ram Ségarpara Pith‘ aura; Dis£rict Mahasamund(c.g.) / PETITIDNERS r, / VS State a? Chattisgarh, thraugh the Secretary Schael Educatian Department, Mantralaya,Raipur (M.P.) District Educatian officer,Mahasaumd, District Mahaaamuna (C.G.) . .... REs 3§bENT5 wRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 2 6/227 THE\CUNSfITUTID 3F INDI&, FDR ISSUEANCE DF MRITS IN HE NATURE BF CERTI- URARL; NaND&MUS AND/UR ANYDTHER URfTgDRDER OR DIRECTIUNS: ) N ‘ SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. By this petition under Artistes 2261227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek a direction to the respondents to pay the increments and seniority on the basis of the date of their initiai appointment in the Iight of the decision dated 7-7-1 999 (Annexure P-1 2) rendered by the learned State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in Original Application No.439 of 1997 (Chandrika Prasad Pandey and another vs. State of MP. and others) and Original Application No.2283 of 1998 (MP. Shikshak Sangh Branch Distt. Narsinghpur vs. State of i. Li MP. and three others). WR!T PETITION No.1482 OF 2003 Petitioners Laxmi Narayan Pandey and others versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another Present : Mr. A.K.Prasad. counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Sushi! Dubey, Government Advocate for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on 27” of November, 2006) 2 72 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners placed on record a copy of the order dated 9-1 0-2006 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (3.) No.5473 of 2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sharma and another vs. State of Chham'sgarh and others) and submits that the petitioners are simiiariy situated, therefore, the simiiar order may be passed. 3. as Teacher in the School Education Department on probation for a period of two years with the fixed salary. However, later on, after completion of two years’ probation, the petitioners were regularized, but, they were not given the regular pay—scale. Other similarly situated teachers moved the'State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur for regular pay-scale, wherein learned Tribunal, vide order dated 7—7-1999 (Annexure P42), allowed the same. The petitioners made several representations to accord the same treatment as they are also similarly situated teacher, but, the respondents have not paid any heed. Thus, this petition. The cases of the petitioners are that they were appointed 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners may be allowed to make a representation to respondent No.1 to give similar treatment to the petitioners and the same payscale which has been sanctioned'to other similarly situated teachers on account of the order of the State Administrative Tribunal dated 7-7-1 999 (Annexure P-12), to which learned counsel for the respondents/State has no objection. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the opinion of this Court, the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners appears to be reasonable. Therefore, the petitioners are allowed to make a representation within a period of two weeks from today to respondent No.1, raising all their grievances and, in turn, respondent No.1 shall decide the said representation in an objective manner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of such representation, after considering all the points raised by the petitioners and taking into account the order dated 7-7-1999 (Annexure P-12) passed by the learned State Administrative Tribunal in Original Application No.439 of 1997, and if the petitioners stand on the same footings, as the petitioners in the Original Application No.439 of 1997, then they be also sanctioned the same pay-scale and seniority. Gopai 6. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid direction. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihou'i Judge