IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 2-9-<5^ / 2003 PETITIONER ^•:fca :IIMIi="l^ .^'~ra: ^:y ^sc^" •,''\0^'" .'•"'.<^e<^-"" *.y^c?" ^^ RESPONDENTS ^•-^,.. Samaru t)as Mahant, S/o Ashok Das Mahant, aged about 20 years, R/o Sakin Bhantapara, Bhojpur Champa, Thana Champa, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.&.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Departmeht of Home Affairs, 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh, - &.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) 2. Superintendent of Police Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3. Station House Officer, Thana Champa, Oistt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4. District Magistrate, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.6.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IN&IA .XJ-HC-22 sn^r-qir R-ii+ sn^i sti^i0^ -^feo ^a:3W!ISS '?°? -i|l''41^1'4, »'a1+i<is, I««ii'y'j,< '>\ w-i?)i **irai .Mx..V....L.BU^[u..\ e aiA<i «<iim'ofetf 9-9-2003 Shri Suruden Sharai, couitsel for the petitioner. Shri Prween E)as, Panel Lojwyer for the State/respondents. Heard bolh the cour»el. By this petition filed und India, the petitioner seeks to d' cbl^jd^l7! TTTR^ff ^ fec^ <^j^.l< ^ <H['<fM 311^1 er ArHcle 226/227 of the Constitution of th ollen9e the opder dated 25'" Au9ust 2003 passed in crimindl case No. 3/2(p00. Stote of Chhattisgarh Vs. Samorudos Mahant by the Distnct Magistr^te, Janjgir-Champa by which the order of externment against the present (jetitioner' has been passed. At the outset, learned coi|imel for the State/respondents raised the preliminary objection that the ^ection 9 of Chhattis9CB'h ftcuya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 provides for ai^ appeal against the order of the District (Aogisirate and this order has be^n passed recently on 25 Au9ust 2003 and the petitioner has not preferre^l an apped against the order which is the statutory right of the petitioner.j 1-taving heard the lear^ed counsel for* the pcrties, since the efficacious alternative remedy | is available to the petitioner and the petitioner could hove filed app^al before the State ©overnment under Section 9 of fhe Act which he ha^ not preferred, therefore, no relief can be grcaited by way of this writ petiti^n. If the petitioner files an ^lppeal before the respondents/State then the State will deeide the appeal 4<peditiously as ear-ly as pMsible. With these observations, ^he writ petition is disposed of. I;'-- i. i. XI-HC-22 311^1 ^RT 1?;IW3II^I *1Hi<^ ^lf$<T .;iL 'S^ •<ii<ii<»t<i, einl'y'is, (q-'ii'My NWWI SbHrchf^--^ ^ra^ . sfflle.^ "^I. 200 ^^T' sii^B^gw^ifw t- chi<iFa4lt TTCT^ff ^ fe^ •lf^4^1< i^si^naii^r Consequently, M.(W.)P. h(o. 2561/2003 and 1A. No.8394/2003 also stand disposed of. Porties are entitled for c^rtified copy of this order. Jadtge