1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.241 OF 2009 Atul Omkar Shay Jouhari. ..Appellant. Vs. Mrs. Neena Atul Jauhari. ..Respondent. Advocate Mr.A.M.Sarogi for the Appellant. Advocate Ms. D.R.patil for the Respondent. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 8th Sept.2009 PC : 1. This is an appeal filed by the opponent husband against grant of maintenance by the trial court. On perusal of the order, it is seen that total amount of maintenance is Rs.20,000/-per month including educational expenses. The counsel appearing for the plaintiff states that his client is earning more than Rs.57,000/- per month. It is however, seen that the opponent husband has chosen not to file his salary slip or proof of salary which would have been the best evidence to indicate his salary. Even in the appeal salary slip has not annexed. Since the order is of interim nature, I am 2 not inclined to entertain the appeal. Hence, appeal dismissed. It is however,made clear that final maintenance order which will be passed on the culmination of the proceeding will be on the basis of the evidence produced. ( R.S.MOHITE,J.)