COCP No. 2016 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 2016 of 2011 Date of Decision: 8.12.2011 Gaj Raj Singh and another ....Petitioners. Versus Dr. Raj Shri Singh ...Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Vaneet Soni, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Batta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. 1. The grievance of the petitioners raised in this petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is that the order dated 9.5.2011 passed by this Court in CRM-M-8615 of 2011 whereby a direction was issued to the respondent to look into the matter, has not been complied with. 2. Upon notice having been issued, affidavit of the respondent has been filed wherein it has been stated that the matter has been gone through by the respondent. Para 7 of the reply reads as under:- “7. That as per inquiry report dated 8.6.2011 by Addl. Superintendent of Police Narnaul the alleged accused have no concern with the death of Nand Ram as at 7.45 PM they had left him at the water COCP No. 2016 of 2011 -2- tank and returned to the village. At that time Shri Bhanisahay aged 75/76 years was present at the water tank. There was no proof/evidence that the accused persons have any connection with the death of Nand Ram. However, the proceeding u/s 174 Cr.P.C. was carried out and a DDR No. 4 dated 28.12.2010 was recorded in the Police Post Dongra Ahir, District Mahendergarh. Rest of the contents of this para is wrong, hence denied.” 3. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to take recourse to legal remedies in accordance with law. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioners to take recourse to legal remedies in accordance with law. December 8, 2011 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE