r^. c^^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH iILASPUR M.A.(C) N0. ^o _/2u0y APPELLANT N.A. N0,2 1^<^ ^A--' ^- R.ESPONDENTS CLAIMANTS .-•* VER.SUS 1 2. 3. 4. 5. RESPONDENT N.A.NO.l 6. -T;( tel@y( ^"" Abhishek Singh aged about 33 years, S/o. S.S. Rajput, caste Kshatriya, resident of - Vidya Up-Nagar, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Smt. Vimla, aged 33 years, widow of Late Lakhan Lal, Pradeep Kumar, aged about 16 years (Minor) son of Late Lakhan Lal. Sunita, aged about 14 years (Minor) D/o. Late Lakhan La! Gesta, aged about 12 years (Minor) D/o. Late Lakhan La! Amit aged about 10 years (Minor) S/o. Late Lakhan La! Resp No. 2 to 5 are minors, through their natura! guardian - Mother - Vimla Bai, widow of Late Lakhan Lal, Al! are Yadav by caste, R/o. Khokhia, Tah. &PS - Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG). Keshav Singh aged about 23 years, son of Gajraj Singh, caste - Gond, R/o. Bakel'i, Tah. And Distt. Umariya, P.S. Paalf (MP) MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OFTHE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 f-^3 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR CORAM: Hon'ble Shri I.M. Quddusi, J. & Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar ?»1ishra,J. M.A.(C1No.80oT2009 APPELLANT AbhishekSingh. Versus RESPONDENTS Smt. Vimla and others. Appearance: None for ths appellant. ORALORDER Following M. Qutfdusi. J (28/02/2011) oral prder of the Court was passed by List is being revised. Case is calied out twice. No one is present to press I.A. No. 1 application for condonation of delay in fding the appeal. The appeal is barred by 26 days. (2) This Court has no other way except to dismiss the application for condonation of delay Tor non-prosecution and dismiss the appeal as time barred. (3) Inview^fttie above, the appea! is dismissed ^ Sd/-_ _ ^ I.M.Quddusi ! Judge prasbantKumar Judge Misbra &, •f