IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8478 of 2009 1. CHANDRA SHEKHAR PANDEY, SON OF LATE YAMUNA PANDEY 2. VIDYA DEVI @BULBUL PANDEY, WIFE OF CHANDRA SHEKHAR PANDEY. 3. PRAMOD PANDEY, SON OF LATE YAMUNA PANDEY 4. KIRAN PANDEY, WIFE OF PRAMOD PANDEY 5. CHANDRA KALA PANDEY, WIFE OF LATE BIRENDRA PANDEY 6. ABIHISHEK PANDEY @ CHHOTU SON OF PRAMOD PANDEY ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SHIVAJEE COLONY, P.S. K. HAT, DISTRICT PURNEA. ------- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAM KISHORE PANDEY, SON OF LATE RAM PYARE PANDEY, R/O VILLAGE PAUNI HASANPUR, P.S. AND DISTRICT VAISHALI --------- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 3. 31.08.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 8.8.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court -7th, Purnea, in Sessions Trial No. 150 of 2007 has summoned the petitioners to face trial under Section 319 Cr. P.C. The petitioners were named in the First Information Report as one of the family members who used to torture the deceased for ends of dowry being their cousin parents-in-law and cousin brother-in-law. However, after investigation, final report was submitted in their regard but when PW-5 and PW-6 disclosed the complicity of the petitioners during trial, the petitioners were summoned under Section 319 Cr. P.C. The Opposite Party No. 2 was noticed by this Court by an order dated 11.5.2010 and supports the impugned order. 2 On directing the counsel for the petitioners to look into the case diary and the statements recorded of PW-5 and PW-6 under Section 161 Cr. P.C. it is submitted that in fact, these witnesses have deposed that they heard from the deceased that demands of dowry were being made by these petitioners. Under the circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)