IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 11820 of 2008. Decided on: 24th December, 2010. Sandeep Kumar. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 NO. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Addl. A.G. with Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. A.G. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that the respondents be restrained from terminating his services w.e.f. 31.03.2005. However, it has come in the reply that the petitioner’s services have not been dis-engaged and he is still continuing. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as having become infructuous, so also the petition application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 24, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 -