... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2027 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO.2027 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO.2027 OF 2003 IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.551 OF 2003 APPEAL NO.551 OF 2003 APPEAL NO.551 OF 2003 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Rajesh More, A.P.P. for the State. Shri Vishwanath S.Talkute for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : SEPTEMBER 01, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 01, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 01, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocates appearing for the parties. Perused the earlier order dated 21st November, 2005. I have also perused the affidavit of the learned A.P.P. In view of the assertions made in the affidavit of the learned A.P.P., sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Accordingly, Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE