@ Sinai: éanch IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATISHGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION 4’ 2 éé /2004 /, / Damarudhar Patel aged about Shri Raja ram presently working as Assistant teacher Jongra, Tahsil — Sakti, Distt. — Janjgir Chanpa, Chhattishgarh Versus PETITIONER — RESPONDENTS: 1. The State of Chhattjsgarh, / Through: the Secretaly, Department of Education, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur 2. Collector Distric- Janjgir Champa, ‘Chattisgarh . 3. District Education Officer District Janjgir— Chamoa Chattisgarh. 4. Block Education OfiiCer Sakti, District- Janj gir-Champa. Chattisgarh. ' . Shri Narayan Prasad Rathore Presently working as Assistant Teacher At sigansara, Teh Sakti ,Dist janjgir champa Chhatisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA EWWW‘ .' MN P Lm—éa giaa! §nl$ WI 200 4 ..... ........... WW(W) gamma“ ’ mwiffsém ‘ $3TEFIW W ‘ 8.2.2005 ‘ I Shri Sanjdy Kumar Agraw’al,kounsel for +he pefi‘rioner. Shri Sudhir Agrawal, Panel .aWyer- fowl-he S‘l'afe/respondenfs 1 1‘0 -4 on advance copy. Heard. Learned counsel for fha efi'rianer submifs fhaf the pdi'rioner- ,is ~ presen'l'ly working m A‘ésisfant T er- af Jurga Primary School under fhe Block Edueafion office, Sak+i, Dismcf Jaqjgir-Chumpa. .Responden‘i' No.5 is also working as Assisfanf Teache ' Sigomswn, Primary School under Block Educafion office, Sakfi, Disfrief aqjgir-Champa. The presen‘r pefifioner and respondent No.5 were appoinfed o fhe same post on fhe same day i.e. 75.2.1982 and fhey are governed by fhe ules in relafion 1'0 their service conditions Learned counsel for fhe pefmo er furfher submrrs fhaf fhe pe‘rrhoner is ' presenfly getting a salary @ Rs. - per mom-h whereas respondenf No 5 is ge'r‘l'ing his salary @ Rs: 6650/— per- monjih. Certificafe fo fhis effecfhas been filed as Annexure P-l ‘collec‘l'ively Learned Counsel for The peilmoner submrl-s that there cannot be anomaly , m the payment of salary to this extent that the persons employed on the same t past on the same day wull- get salary at different rates, who are working under the‘spine Block Education office He also submits that the petitioner has given many representations in this regard which are filed ‘as Annexures P—2 and P-3, but the‘authorities of the respondents are not deciding the representationsand are not satisfying the grievance raised by the petitioner. /// G1; pRJ——FS/350— 1 2/2000—50,000. mmw WW p e h r 1 s r 6 / , ., ... ... ......... W2004 r w.f.’.....m“ ... mm r WWUEW) mmm 1_ \ urinh arum, arned Counsel for- +he peiii'iqnene makes lifed er- h fl * arl-inner may be given an eppar-funify f0 e h epsenn 10 f m aurhairy ihudél drted 0 decld period ad b leard Cotinsel for The petitioner is no+ nsel a ‘i a' Ardinly te praer is allwd en my mke a r entation within a period of 15 days from The ptitioer a a e es t long With co o this d r " mtt ahority a if such p ahority, in n shll dcid t e e s the te of eipt of t e som rgad , , WMitwma-nr *3immr" Dgfe course of gems le V a im pray fd preseny,’ he e fil e fres rrefal'io ‘ he capelenf authority and Ilhe' cempefent l ‘r-' sqlbe iec f e the represerifal'ion ‘wi'ihin a sfipulal'ed r This mired prayer me y ne opps ‘ by fhe cou fr he St'le - ccog, h y oe oday a a py f or and a copy of writ petition before the copeen ut nd reresentation is field, the competent ut tur a ee rpresentation within a period of two month from da rec e by passing a reasoned order in this er ’ \ t Wh e afsd observio s, the L it th oreai at petition stands finally disposed of. I Cosntly,lMWP,N4624/204 neque..o.0f and IIA.No.8629/2004 also stand ispos o. hi r V i ‘ Sd/_ l [/Nxf ill ded f Cerifie o’ uls. td cpyas per re //\ / , .Sum] Kumar Sinha/ :,,, ’“g 9 Judge J7“ f V§§§ Audit: G‘x; DRJ-FS/35oaiz/2OOO45O,OOO. _ oe