NGIE BEFORE HON'BLE H1GH_ COURJ_OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S)No. ^US /2010 PETITIONER / [ ^^•S£^^'° about ^o-::^^f0:^ ^^^y^J-l-- Q...' Ku. Jyoti Meshram D/o Late Shri Krishna Kumar Meshram, Aged 30 years, R/o. Bahadurguda, Near Godam Naka Jagdalpur(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS '''1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Scheduled Caste & Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^fesssS;a ^s-sy s ^6/ ^ff:yy 2) State Level High Power Caste Verification Committee, Raipur, (Tribal Research and Training Institution), Through - it's Director, University Campus, Raipur Distt. Raipur(C.G.) / 3) Principal, Government Girls Polytecnic, Jagdalpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. <V an^iqnRpw •OTi 3n3S! sPWK --< •^aET ^l^M'4, ^•dly'lto', P'«ni<4^< _....^..e&....^.:.^..^^ an^ngqT (YI^»<<«T) TOiraT^ftasn^i •qiraferil^ 'wrcff ^' fstzt <(ait<;i<. ^? afRfif SD^SI SB: Hon'ble Shri Maaindra Molhan SIu-ivastava. J. 14.7.2010 Shri Anup Majumdar, coijnsel for fhe petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Paael L^wyer for the State, on advance copy. Heard. Submission of leamed cjaunsel for fhe petitioner is fhat fhe petitioner was appoiuted againsit the post reserved for Schedule Caste categoiy on fhe strength ofcast^ certificate issued in her favoiir. In fhe course of tunc, aftejr about 4 years, respondent No.3 vide his notice dated 6th June, 2008 ^Aimexure P-5), directed the petitioner to get his caste certificate verified from the State Level High Power Caste Scrutmy Cominittee (for sjliort "fhie Committee"). It is submitted that fhereafter, fhe petitioner ^ubiaitted her appUcation before fhe Coininittee, but the Coiluiuttee (jlid not accept the appUcation. FiuaUy an appUcation for veri&cation of castistatus was sent to respondeat- Coitunittee through registered p^st on 21.6.2010 (Aimexure P-8). The apprehension of the petitioner is; has beea issued by fhe Principal that adverse order may be passed by respondent No.3 on account of D|on-avaaabiU.1y ofverification, as letter fcin Ist May, 2010 (Annexure P-7). On petitioner's laaking d^tailed representation seeking caste verification submitted before the| respondent No.2 at Raipzir, wifhia a period of 1 inonfh from today, decision on fhe same iu accordani ipondent No.2 shaU take appropriate ce with law. ^51^^ 'ij C—78 ^~"T "tll<1l<?1';1, 0Tli<-l'16, lqo11<H>J,< STi^T qil R;4i+ OTI sn^v ihii'* Era^^eeii sn^'q^? ((i*il-i<<<ttt) yRIIW^taSD^t ?. 4il<if<TI'4l'1 'RTt^f ^' S^1^ ^^.K i?siRn aii^i Until fimal decision is ta(cen by respondent No.2 on petitioner's 1 application, one way or fhe oth| respondent No. 1 85 3 agauist| status. It is expected that the C^ an outer luait of 6 month^ representauon. With the aforesaid obsl disposed off. Certified copy as per reel^ er, no adverse action shatl be taken by the petitioner pertauung to her caste )iiunittee shaU decidell fhe case witliin Ironi the date of receipt of such srvations, fhe petition. staads finally Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge