I IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED TH1S THE 151H DAY OF FEBRUARY 2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER WRITPETITIONNOs6443j2Q44i2i0 BETWEEN: Sri, K. Lakshmikantha s/o. late Sri, Sanna Basappa aged about 35 years (Petitioner in WP. No, 64430/2010) 2. Smt. Basalingamma w/o. late Sri, Sanna Basappa aged about 60 years (Petiti.oner in WP. No, 64432/2010) 3, Smt, Hemalatha o. Sri, Lakshmikantha aaed about 30 years (Petitioner in W. P. No, 64433 20 .i. 0) The pe.titioners are the R/ o. Chaganuru vilLage, Moka blobli Bdiary Taluk and District 2 (By Sri. C. Mallikarjuna Reddy, Adv.) AND: 1. The State of Karnat.aka Rep. By the Chief Secretary Vidhana Soudha Dr. Ambedkar Veedhi Bangalore —560001 2. The Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board No.14/3, 2nd Floor Nrupathunga Road Bangalore —560001 Rep. By its Chief Executive Member 3. The Land Acquisition Officer The Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board, Dharwar 4. The Deputy Commissioner Beliary District, Bellary 583 101 5. Under Secretary to the Government Industries and Commerce Department M.S. Building Dr. Ambedkar Veedhi Bangalore —560001 6. The Principal Secretary Infrastructure Development Department Vikas Soudha Dr. Amb;edkar Veedhi Bangalore - 560 001 3 7. The Airports Authority of India Rep. By its Chairman Eajiv Gandhi Bhavan Safdarjung Air port New Delhi 110 003 8. The Ministry of Aviation Government of India Rajiv Gandhi Bhavan Safdarjung Air Port New Delhi 110 003 RESPONDENTS (By Smt. K. Vidyavati, A for R1, 4, 5, and 6 Sri.l Mahesh Wodevar. Adv. for R2 and R3 Sri. AT. Savanur, Adv. for R7 and R-8 Sri. Mruthyunjay Tata Bangi, CGSC, for R7 and R8) These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India proving to quash Annexure- 1K notification and etc. These petieinns coming on for orders this day. the Court made the fOllowing: 4 ORDER The petitioners have filed a memo through their learned Counsel Sri Veerashekar stating that they do not press the writ petitions in so far as their claim is concerned. Sri. Veerashekar, learned Counsel, has identified the above petitioners, who are present before Court. Sri. Mallikarjuna Reddy, learned Counsel, who had filed writ petitions on their behalf, has no objection for Sri. Veerashekar, learned Counsel, to file the memo on their behalf. 2. The memo is placed on record. The writ petitions are dismissed as not pressed in so far as the petitioners are concerned. No costs. Sd! JUDGE Cs