IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11025 of 2009 KANTHI YADAV SON OF LATE DILO YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHAGHRA, P.S. CHANDRAMANDI, DISTRICT – JUMAI. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 16.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under Sections 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is that he alongwith other co-accused persons have kidnapped the wife of the informant while he was out of house. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has been implicated in this case on mere suspicion. Learned counsel for the State on perusal of the case diary submits that during investigation witnesses have supported the prosecution case and wife of the informant has not been recovered till date. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)