THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6272 of 2008 ORDER: In this Writ Petition, petitioner seeks a mandamus by way of issuing directions to respondents 1 to 3 not to regularize the constructions made by the fourth respondent and extend the benefits conferred under G.O.Ms.No.901, Municipal Administration, dated 31.12.2007 as amended in G.O.Ms.No.112, Municipal Administration, dated 31.01.2008. It is the case of the petitioner that the fourth respondent in deviation to the approved sanction plan, has made constructions and he has also filed a suit for declaration and mandatory injunction. In this Writ Petition, it is the grievance of the petitioner that during pendency of the proceedings, when the fourth respondent has filed an application for regularization to avail the benefits under G.O.Ms.Nos.901 and 112, dated 31.12.2007 and 31.01.2008, respondents 1 to 3 are bent upon to consider the same. It is evident from the counter-affidavit filed by the fourth respondent that regularization orders were passed before passing the interim orders by this Court. It is also represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that questioning such regularization proceedings, the petitioner filed a separate Writ Petition. In view of passing of orders on the application filed by the fourth respondent seeking regularization of his constructions, the subject matter of the Writ Petition has become infructuous. In that view of the matter, while it is open to the petitioner to work out her remedies in the other Writ Petition filed by her, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 29th OCTOBER, 2011. kvni