<; - '.ifc.3 :ii; HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT^ILASPUS DMSiQNBENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHR! JAGDISH BHALLA, Ag. CJ. & HON'BLE SHR! DILIP RAOSAHEB DESHMUKH. J. Aflpejjant Petitioner Respondents WritADpeal No. 271 of 2007 Ramkhilawan Kewat, s/o. Latet Ram Kewai, aged about 28 years R/o. > Viiiage Baitary, P.0. Malhar Tah. \ Masturi Distt. Bilaspyr (C.G.) Versus Gram Panehayat, Vjll. Jaitpur, P.0; Malhar, Tah. Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur Smt. . Santosh Kumar Pandey, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Jaitpur, Tah. iasturi,©istt.Bilaspur(C.G.) 3. Chief Ex^euiive Offieer Matsay KrjshaK Vikas Abhikaran, Bilaspur 4. State ofChhaaisgarh Through — Co!iector,Bi!aspur(C.G.) MemorandumofWritAppeatunderSection2(1)ofHighCouttof Chhatt!sgarh(AciDeai4oDiV!sJonBertch)Act2006 Present: Shri J.P. Sarkar,counselfortheappe!lant. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govemmerit Advocate for the Stete. ORALJUDGMENT (Passed on 31st0c:tober,2007) The foiiowirig oral judgment of the Gourt was passed by Hon'bteJagdish Bhalla, Ag. C.J. ' Learned eounsei for the appellant submits that there are twoi agreements; one js tegal and the ptiier is iilegal, therefore he has u'. -. .'.;: ' :1;.".- certain rights ftowing from vaiidity of the agfeeraeR^to do busiHess. ••L.-^-l. ;-h „!" w ]R It i!iiil •Wh —?1 (,: " • - C, •2-- Accordingly, learned counsel prays that the order passed by the learned Single Judge beset aside. No other point was pressed. Learned counsei for the State.Shri SushiS Dybey submits that the order passed by the leamed Single Judge isabsoluteiy correct •^ . . because the appellant has not givenany reason as to why thesaid agreement isillegal. -\ We are of theconsider^:! opinion that the learned Singie Jydge ""^; •' • ^.~ : has dealt with the matter and has rightly come to the conclusion that the petitioner hasfaiied to explain why the said agreement is illegal. Further,|t was found by the learned Single Judge that the petitioner/ appellant has not made any prayer to the effect that thesecond agreement is illegal. Learned counsel for the appellant failed to point out any illegaiity iri the impugned order, warranttng interference in this appeal. Accordihgly, the writ appeal is dismissed. Sd/- ActingChiefJustice nimmi Sd/- Chief Justice ms