IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA FRIDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2010 / 28TH JYAISTHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 3539 of 2010() ----------------------------- CC.1484/2010 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, PUNALUR CRIME NO.287/2010 OF ANCHAL POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT. .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED ---------------------------------- SUSHI, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.THANKAPPAN, SUJA MANDIRAM, THAZHAMEL MURI, ANCHAL VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJIV C.KRISHNAN RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANCHAL POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.V. TEKCHAND. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs. K. HEMA, J. --------------------------- B.A. No. 3539 of 2010 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of June, 2010 O R D E R This petition is for bail. 2. The alleged offence is under Section 15(4) of the Kerala Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007. According to prosecution, petitioner was involved in three criminal cases and hence I.G. Of Police, Thiruvananthapuram Range, directed the petitioner not to enter the jurisdictional limits of Dy.S.P., Anchal Police Station, under Section 15(4) of the Kerala Anti Social Activities (prevention) Act, 2007. But he violated the same and hence he is proceeded against under Section 15(4) of the Kerala Anti Social Activities (prevention) Act, 2007. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner is the sole bread winner of the family and he is in custody for the past 89 days. Hence lenient view will be taken, it is submitted. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that trial has already commenced and hence, if bail is granted, it is likely that petitioner may abscond. B.A. No. 3539 of 2010 2 5. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied that there is a chance of petitioner absconding and hence I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. If there is any delay in disposal of the case, petitioner is at liberty to move the trial court for appropriate relief, notwithstanding dismissal of this petition. Petition is dismissed. K. HEMA, JUDGE ln