In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Criminal Misc. No.M-10172 of 2010 ..... Date of decision:24.5.2010 Usha Rani .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....Respondent .... Present: Mr. Parminder Singh-I, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shilesh Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State. Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocate for the complainant. ..... S.S. Saron, J. The petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for the grant of interim bail for a period of three months to the petitioner in a case registered against her for the offence under Section 304-B IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to the medical report (Annexure-P.2) and submitted that there is inadequate arrangement for treatment of the petitioner at Central Jail, Bathinda and she is not able to get her full treatment. It is submitted that the petitioner has undergone major bye-pass surgery. She needs treatment for Menorrhaogia. Besides, she is suffering from numbness of both the lower limbs. She is also suffering from loss of sleep and depression. Learned counsel for the State and the complainant have submitted that the trial in the case is complete and the case is now listed for 4.6.2010 for statement of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. Therefore, Cr. Misc. No.M-10172 of 2010 [2] it is submitted that the petitioner is not entitled to any relief. After giving my thoughtful consideration to the matter, it may be noticed that the petitioner had also filed an application dated 17.3.2010 (Annexure-P.1) before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bathinda for giving her proper treatment. In the said application the learned Additional Sessions Judge has called for report of doctor from the Central Jail, Bathinda and also to report as to whether the treatment is available in the Jail. In the circumstances, it would be just and expedient that the matter is considered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge who is seized of the case and after receiving necessary report consider the case of the petitioner for grant of interim bail. The same would be necessary as the trial of the case is also fixed before the learned Additional Sessions Judge for recording statement of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. on 4.6.2010. Therefore, the criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of with the direction that in case the petitioner files an application for interim bail on medical grounds before the Additional Sessions Judge, the same shall be considered by him in accordance with law. May 24, 2010. (S.S. Saron) Judge *hsp*