1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Civil Application No. 2016/2008 in WP No. 935/1999 (Mansingh N. Jadhav .vs.Smt. Pramila Ramdas Nagre and ors. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders ======================================= Mr. Z.A. Haq, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A.D. Sonak, AGP for Respondents 2 and 3 .......... CORAM : K.J. ROHEE, & R.C.CHAVAN, JJ DATED : APRIL 1, 2008 1. Mr. A.D. Sonak, AGP for respondents no.2 and 3 seeks time to file reply. Prayer is rejected. 2. Heard Mr. Z.A. Haq, Advocate for the applicant Shri Anand Mahadu Bharkade, the then Sub Divisional Magistrate. A perusal of the order dated 26.2.2001 clearly shows that while making adverse remarks on the conduct of the applicant, he was neither a party to the proceedings nor a notice was given to him. As held in State of Maharashtra .vs. Public Concern for Governance Trust and ors. - AIR 2007 Supreme Court 777, such remarks are one sided and do not merit any consideration. In view of this , we proceed to pass 2 the following order:- Paras 6 and 7 of the impugned order are hereby deleted. The application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE halwai