-: 1 :- Sachin HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 937 OF 2009 Ajit Kumar Oberoi & Others. .. Petitioners. Versus State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. Mr. Rajendra Sorankar for the Petitioners. Mrs. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & R. Y. GANOO, JJ. DATE : 20th November 2009. P. C. : 1. We have heard Mr. Sorankar, learned counsel for the Petitioners. 2. We are satisfied that so far as the relief in prayer clause (a) is concerned, the Petitioner may approach the very same Court before whom t he private complaints have been filed or before the Sessions Court for clubbing the complaints or the sessions cases, as the case may be. -: 2 :- 3. So far as the prayer clause (b) is concerned, Mr. Sorankar states that the Petitioner has already applied for anticipatory bail and the proceedings are pending. 4. Hence, the petition is disposed off with liberty to the Petitioner to approach the Court below. (R. Y. Ganoo, J.) (B. H. Marlapalle, J.)