$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 282/2008 MEENU BHARGAVA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: None versus MUKUL P. BHARGAVA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Bhargava, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: SH. VIRENDER BHATT (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) O R D E R % 01.08.2017 C.M. No.24620/2017 None is present on behalf of appellants despite service of notice upon them as well as through their counsel. This application has been filed by respondent no.2 u/O 22 R 3 CPC seeking to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased respondent no. 3 who is stated to have expired on 23.06.2017. Heard. The application has been filed within the prescribed period of limitation. Since the appellants have not appeared despite service, it is deemed that they did not intend to oppose the application. Therefore the application allowed. The legal representatives of deceased respondent no. 3 as mentioned in para no. 3 of the application are brought on record in his place. FAO(OS) 282/2008 1/2 The amended memo of parties filed alongwith application is not complete. The respondent no. 2 shall file fresh memo of parties during the course of the day. List before the Hon'ble Court on the date already fixed i.e. 04.08.2017. VIRENDER BHATT (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) AUGUST 01, 2017 NR FAO(OS) 282/2008 2/2