IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1373 of 2010 MUKESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05. 12.01.2011 This matter has been listed at the instance of the petitioner. It is submitted that an application seeking modification in the order dated 15.11.2010 has been filed on 11- 01-2011. The said application/affidavit is not on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, handed in a copy of the said application which is kept on record marked ‘Y’. It is submitted that by order dated 15.11.2010, petitioner was directed to be released on bail subject to the condition that father of the petitioner shall be one of the bailors. Learned counsel for the petitioner referring to the averments made in para nos. 4 and 5 submits that the father of the petitioner does not own substantial properties. Properties are in the name of his mother, namely, Parwati Devi W/o Jagdish Prasad. It is thus submitted that in place of father the mother of the petitioner may be permitted to stand as one of the bailors. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Having regard to the averments made in the application, this Court is satisfied that the order dated 15.11.2010 be modified in the following manner:- In place of father of the petitioner, the mother of the petitioner, namely, Parwati Devi shall be permitted to stand as 2 one of the bailors. This will satisfy the condition as set out in order dated 15.11.2010. The order dated 15.11.2010 is modified/clarified to that extent only. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Court of Juvenile Justice Board, Gaya, in connection with Trial no. 1163 of 2010, arising out of Gaya G.R. P.S. case no. 63 of 2010 through FAX at the cost to be deposited by the petitioner. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)