(1) ^ ^ \^7^—Ci IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.ISINO. LA?^^ of 2009 PETITIONER -/' ^^' ^" L\"~ ^&6'.&•••" -\^-^ ^^~€: ^^^•"^ ^ .^^,: RESPONDENTS Dr. Kusum Singh Paraste, S/o Shobhit Singh, aged about 45 years, presently working on the post of Head Master, Boys Middle School, Ketka, Block-Surajpur, District-Sarguja (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) D.K.S. 2. 3. 4. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Ambikapur, District-Sarguja (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Surajpur, District-Sarguja (C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA —78 an^t w K4v WT 3TT^a>*ti<^> *11*ICTI a»N)e(i 3^E[ •<ii<iioq,yfll.y'Ko, (qcil'yy .....lAl.-..£:..^X......4^6, sn^r'^?? (i?(3°«»4) TOnw8tei3ii^?f 'VtSl V!t <S.&¥OT ^TTTffiW^i? T»'OS'JTtTMUI'»tC»rtTliyAU'ST-' • 12.8.2009 Shri A.N.Pandey , counsel fij Shri U.N.S.Deo, G.A. fcrthl Chailenge in the oresent] 30.6.2009 (Annexure P/l) passec^ petitioner who is working as Heaj Boys Middle School Ketka, Block| School, Nawaearh, Biock Gharghoj it>r flhe Contention of counsel for has joined on 8.10.2008 in the ort period of ten months he has bl contends that the seniority of district wise whereas the petitiorl district to another district and on his seniority wiil be adversely at'f^cted has been shitted in place of the pe^ Contention of counsel for make a representation to the reso<i decided in accordance with law. Counsel for the petitioner However he submits that till petltioner may oe given some 'sbWld^'f TTFf^if "^f fs^ <fa1^i< ^siRn sii^i the petiticner. i State. petition is to the order dated by respondent No. 1 by which the imaster has been transferred from Surajpur, Distt. Surguja to Middle ia, Distt. Raigarh. petitioner is that the petitioner isent place of posting and within a sen transferred again. He further FIeadmasters is being maintained |er has been transferred from one ^.ccount of shifting of the petitioner, i. He also submits that no one litioner. :he State is that let the petitioner tadent No. 1 and the same would be |agrees to make a representation. hjis representation is decided, the prot^ctive order. ,*• ~3^ •<ii'4ici'4, a>nl'M<is, fs«'ti<Hy,< —.....l!'J.-.(3:....^.l.....tf.%.<-J aT[^fq5W(^if3<l^) ngisR^Hft'ian^i Accordingly, the petition is dis petitioner to make a representation ttithin a period of ten days from the date ot receipt of the copy of Ijhis order, the same would be decided within a period of three week^ then the impugned order shaii not be be allowed to perform his duties in hid Wiferi^ •WRtf•ifftiat XiW?R m*i <»i^i bosed of with a direction to the from the date of its receipt. Till ^iven effect to and the petitioner present place of ppstms.^_ Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge