CRM No. M 21041 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 21041 of 2010 Date of decision: 17.01.2011 Krishan Chand ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. S K Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sidrath Sarup, AAG, Haryana for the respondent - State Mr. Kiran Kumar Madan, Advocate for respondents No. 4 and 5 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of direction to respondents No. 1 to 3 not to harass the petitioner at the behest of respondent Nos. 4 and 5. Reply of Madan Lal, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Assandh, District Karnal on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3 has been filed. As per the preliminary submissions of the said reply, since the petitioner and others were named and blamed in the said representation by one Gurmeet Kaur, who had solemnized the second marriage with Tilak Raj CRM No. M 21041 of 2010 2 after the death of her first husband and the petitioner and others had also objected to their marriage and as such, the petitioner was summoned to protect the life and liberty of respondents No. 4 and 5. Since, no further complaint has been received against the petitioner, as such, he is no more required by the Local Police and hence the present petition deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly, no further order is required to be passed. Disposed of accordingly. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 17.01.2011 mohan