c IN THE HONSLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^) ^\ Contempt Case (C) No. (o^ 72010 Arising out of order dated 06.01.20^10 passed in W.P. (S)No. 1977 /2009 PETITIONER Jeevan Lal Banjare, S/o Heera l^ \^ Das, aged about 65 years, R/o •^; ^' Y^-"^ ^- ^•:y M' .0^v '^^v v^>-v CONTEMNOR Tilak ward Pipalapara, Lormi Marg Mungeli, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS G.D. Dahariya, Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council Mungeli, 6t')qSpur District-D-i»sg-(C.G.) ^ ^^° CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTION 10 OF CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT 1971 READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. feHC-22 3TT^T^T ^i^b 3TI^?T $n^i<=t) ^rfin inyi Deepti tf ~?^r ^ii^tid<Li, ^Til^^i^. fci^i^<i< ^l^dl ^h^lich TT^T XR-^ ..^A:....a^.U^:^/o 'f^^T' 3i7T^T ^Rff^R'^TT SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohah Shrivastava. J 28-01-2011 Shri Somkant Verma, counse| Shri Arun Sao, counsel for th^ Learned counsel for the this Court has been complied with. Referring to the averments respondent submits that the money has been paid and the amount of inl|e in view of the submissions the order of this Court has beer( discharged. The petition is finaliy di| cni^I<n<flt 'RPR^ff ~? feccrt ^^K '^'^Tp^H^TT^T for the petitioner. respondent. petjtioner submits that the order passed by Made in the return, learned counsei forthe l^hich is due and payable to the petitioner inl^rest has aiso been paid. t|nade by iearned counsel for the parties, compiied with. Therefore.the rule is i^posed off. —"s'"""" [^^^