u ^^ 9- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISOARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 1930 of2004 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Sah-amdas son of Vidhamal, aged about 50 years , resident ofBhilai Camp, Bhilai, Distt. Diu% (CG). VERSUS 1. Union of India through its Secretary, Telecommunication Department, Central Secretariat, New Delhi. 2. Director, Telecom (Transmission Maintenance) Westem Telecom Region, 2 Floor, Transmission building, C.T.O. Compound, Jabalpur (MP). 3. The District Telecommumcation Enginea', Durg Trurit District at Raipur, Exchange Buildirig, Pachpedi, Raipur(CG). (WRTT PETtTION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUHON OF IKDIA) f8B: Hon'Me Mr. Satish K. AsnUwtei. J.) Present : Noneforthepetitioner. Shri R.M. Solapurkar, Advocate for the respondents. ORALOBDER (Passed on 22"°flay ofJannary, 2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. Qn both occasimis, none appears nor any represeutaition is made on behatf ofthe petitioner. The petitfpner mav not be interested in the matter. In view oftiie above, the matter is dismissed fw want ofproseeution. Consequently, M(W)P No. 1726/04, applieation for grant of' uiterim reUef; stands disp<»edof. Sahu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge >