.{1}. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.421 OF 2008 AGAINST WRIT PETITION NO.4190 OF 2007 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.384 OF 2008 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.421 OF 2008 Rangaswamy Thangavelu. ..Appellant. Versus Administrative Officer-III, Directorate of Construction, and 2 others. ..Respondents. ... Mr.Mohan Shetty, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.G.Hariharan, Advocate a/w. Mr.G.N.Srinivasan, Advocate i/b. R.D. Rathod, Advocate for the respondents. ... CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : 13TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED : 13TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED : 13TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. On the other hand the learned Single Judge has been very sympathetic towards the appellant .{2}. and has permitted him to participate in the scheme of allotment of the tenement with a observation that his case should be considered sympathetically. Letters Patent Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Civil Application is also dismissed. [J.N.PATEL,J.] [J.N.PATEL,J.] [J.N.PATEL,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]