1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3230 OF 1991 Bhusawal Education Society, Bhusawal and another ...Petitioners Versus Milind Ragho Tayade and another ...Respondents ..... Mr. S.V. Natu h/f A.R. Joshi, advocate for the petitioners Shri V.D. Godbharle, A.G.P. For the respondents 2 to 4. ..... CORAM: S.S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 8TH JANUARY, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 Learned counsel for the petitioner, across the bar, has tendered certain documents, which are marked “X” (collectively) for identification. Perusal of the said documents would show that the respondent No.1 herein is relieved from the Girls High school and Junior College, Bhusawal run by Bhusawal Education Society. The another document is letter written by Head Master, Girls High School and Junior College, Bhusawal to the Principal, Junior college, Chinchghar, Tq. Wada, District Thane, communicating therein that the respondent No.1 herein is relieved from the services. The third document is order issued by the Deputy Director of Education, Nashik Division, Nashik declaring the respondent No.1 herein 2 as surplus teacher and further directing the Principal Junior College, Chinchghar, Tq Wada, District Thane to absolve the respondent No.1 herein in the services of said junior college. 2 From perusal of the main prayer in the petition, it appears that this petition takes exception to the judgment and in appeal No. GEN/111/JAL-13 of 1990 decided on 5.8.1991 by which the respondent No.1 was directed to be reinstated by the petitioner. 3 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in pursuance to the impugned order the respondent No.1 was reinstated in the services of the petitioner. However, he was relieved from the services and he was declared as surplus teacher and direction was issued by the Deputy Director to the Junior College, Chinchghar, Tq. Wada, District Thane to absorb him in the service of the said junior college. Therefore, in view of the subsequent events, which took place after filing of the petition, the petition may be disposed of since the respondent No.1 is relieved from services of the petitioner and subsequent directions issued by the Deputy Director of Education Nashik Division, Nashik to absorb him in the junior college, Chinchghar, Tq. Wada, District Thane. In the result, writ petition is disposed of. Rule discharged. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. ( S.S. SHINDE. J.) rlj/ 3