CRM M 33188 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 33188 of 2009 Date of decision: 22.02.2011 Rattan Singh Yadav ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. B S Saroha, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Vats, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana for the respondent - State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of order dated 09.09.2009 of the learned Special Judge, Narnaul which he has passed qua the present petitioner while parting with his judgment dated 09.09.2009 rendered in Sessions Case No. 02 of 2006/2008 titled State v. Mange Ram and 16 others, under Sections 420 IPC etc. and under Section 13 (1) (D) of the Prevention of Corruption Act relating to FIR No. 50 dated 29.11.2002, P S SVB (H) Gurgaon. Vide order dated 09.09.2009, the Special Judge, Narnaul had directed the SHO, P S SVB (H) Gurgaon to conduct further investigation CRM M 33188 of 2009 2 against Rattan Singh JE and to proceed thereafter in accordance with law. Reply has been filed by the State. As per the said reply, the matter has been investigated in pursuance to the direction of the Special Judge, Narnaul and the Investigating officer has not found anything incriminating during the course of investigation and untraced report has been prepared and the same is likely to be submitted before the Special Court at the earliest. In view of the reply filed by the State, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition as having been rendered infructuous. Dismissed as such. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 22.02.2011 mohan