IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1342 of 2010 LALIT PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 19.07.2010 Petitioner being the Up-Mukhia is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 467, 468, 471 of the I.P.C. It is alleged against the petitioner that petitioner took the cheque of Rs. 23,52,000/- for submitting to the Bank along with advice note. The money was allotted for being distributed for the beneficiaries of Indira Awas Yojana. It is alleged that in the advice note the name of the beneficiaries were changed. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the change was made by the block office authority and not by the petitioner. Moreover the cheque was in the name of the actual beneficiaries and which never got encashed. Hence no offence is made out. Vide order dated 06.04.2010, a report was called for from the District Magistrate which is at Flag-A which suggests that there was interpolation in the name of the beneficiaries on the advice note but no payment in pursuance to that was made. Considering the fact that interpolation in the advice note was made by the Block Office authority or by the 2 petitioner is still to be decided by the Investigating agency and the fact that no payment has still been made, let the petitioner namely Lalit Paswan, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on Anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Keoti P.S. Case No. 110 of 2009 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)