1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6412 OF 2009 Shankarsingh s/o Gopalsingh Gadiwale, R/o-Hanuman Gadh, Nanded. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra, Through, the Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Maharashtra, 2) The Municipal Commissioner, Nanded Waghala Municipality, Nanded, 3) The Collector, Collector Office, Nanded, District-Nanded. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.R.D. Biradar Advocate for Petitioner. Smt.R.K. Laddha, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.U. CHANDWAL, JJ. DATE : 9TH DECEMBER, 2009. 2 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. 2. The Petitioner prays for direction to Respondent No.2 to decide his representation. According to the Petitioner, his land was subjected to acquisition on 8/1/1356 Fasli for the purposes of construction of labour colony. It is the grievance of the Petitioner that public purpose is being changed by the planning authorities. 3. According to the Petitioner, his land was acquired on 8/1/1356 Fasli. The Petitioner's grievance cannot be entertained now. No case for interference in exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction is made out. There is no merit in the Petition. The Writ Petition is dismissed. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] asb/DEC09/wp6412.09