IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52099 of 2008 SHANKAR MAHTO, son of late Laxman Mahto,resident of village-Chhoti Pahari,P.S.Agamkuan,Distt.Patna- ---------------------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.1.2009 Heard Mr. Vinod Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Akbar Ali, learned A.P.P. The solitary statement in paragraph-2 of the case diary of Suresh Sharma is the basis for rejection of the prayer for bail of the petitioner, who is in custody since 8.8.2008, which date is disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner submitting that the petitioner was remanded to custody on 14.5.2008. The contention is that if Suresh Sharma had seen the petitioner and identified him at the time of the occurrence then it was legitimate that he ought to have divulged the fact to the informant who could have named the petitioner in the F.I.R. Let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.3,000/-(Three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri P. Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Patna City, in connection with Agamkuan P.S. case no.53 of 2008. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )