1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 465 OF 2009 (Arunpal Singh Pralhadsingh Behal .v. State of Maharashtra and another) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2009. Heard Shri N.A. Badar, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.J. Jichkar, the learned APP for the respondent/State. The grievance of the petitioner is that the investigation conducted by the Investigating Officer in Crime No. 225/2009 registered on the basis of the complaint of the petitioner against the culprits for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 294, 506(II) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, is neither effective nor proper. It is submitted that inaction on the part of the Investigating Officer to investigate the crime effectively may result in acquittal and may also result in miscarriage of justice. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has already approached the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur City, Nagpur by filing complaint dated 28.08.2009 in this regard. In the circumstances, we direct the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur City, Nagpur to look into the complaint filed by the petitioner and take appropriate steps accordingly and ensure that the Investigating Officer should conduct the investigation in 2 just, fair and effective manner. With these observations, the criminal writ petition stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.