IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.619 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.6193 OF 1999 Smt.Soni R. Kirkire ....Plaintiff V/s. F.E. Dinshaw Trust & Ors. ....Defendants Mr.Sagar R. Agarkar for the Plaintiff. Ms.Mukta Gobse i/b Mr.S.B. Amin for the Defendants. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 4TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- 1. It is stated on behalf of the Respondents that Respondent No.3 who is proposed to be impleaded is no longer a trustee. Further, it is stated that Respondent No.5 is the administrator of the estate of E.F. Dinshaw and not F.E. Dinshaw as wrongly set out to the schedule in the Chamber Summons. 2. In the circumstances, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer (a). However, Respondent No.3 shall not be impleaded. The changes shall accordingly be made in the amendments. Further the amendments shall also reflect that Respondent No.5 is the administrator of the estate of E.F. Dinshaw and not F.E. Dinshaw. 3. Prayer (b) is rejected as the nature of the claim by the Plaintiff in the other suit is entirely different from the nature of this suit. 4. The Chamber Summons is accordingly disposed of.