IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37154 of 2009 1. SUBODH SINGH 2. Vikash Singh Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 6.1.2010 Heard. The two petitioners are accused in a case under Section 307 of the I.P.C. and are alleged to have dealt lathi and Garansa blow to the informant and his other family members. The contention is that as regards petitioner no. 2,Vikash Singh, he is said to have assaulted the informant with lathi but there is no injury report issued by a Doctor. The above could be the reason for the learned Sessions Judge to direct the petitioners to surrender and prayer for regular bail and I endorse the view of the learned Sessions Judge that the petitioners should surrender and pray for regular bail. Whoever hears the prayer of the two petitioners shall consider the defence of the petitioners of a counter version also which is discussed in the order of the learned 2 Sessions Judge and if need be, may call for the injury report and till the prayer is finally disposed of, the petitioners may be admitted to provisional bail to the satisfaction of the court below, i.e., Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in Magadh University P.S.Case No.22 of 2009. With the above direction, the petition is disposed of. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)