vgA/ G @ (/ IN THE HIGH COURT 03‘ JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR‘ (C.G.) mm PETITIQN No. 171%3 m! 2062 EETSWEM Shi‘math Verma a/o Panchram Verma, aged abamb 42‘ yaars; Resident of village Msmghta, R6. Nenugaon Kala. P.8- Badla. District Kawardha (CG). FETITIWER f” - The State of mhattisgarh, Through the Secrttary Deparunent of Mines and Minaralsi D.K.s. Building Raipur‘, Tahsil and District Raipur (CG). 2. The collector (Mineral) Kawardha, District Kawardha (CG). Egsmunmw ”’ WRIT PE'rmxon UNDER AmxcLEs 226/227 03 THE eONsTITUTIoN 03v mmmi v @g HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR ‘V WRIT PETITION NO.793 OF 2002 PETITIONER ShivnathVerma Versus RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh & Another (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :— Ms. Renu Kochar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P-K- Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. té'v ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 16m day of November, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that with the passage of time the petition has become infructuous, to which learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection. In view of foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. / Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i r g'“ 77 i