€?^'\^Qb^ IN THg HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIL^SPSR WRIT :^ETXTION N0, ^~^°. QP 2004 •ii('w»-»»rt»»i'a»'N-»)ir«n(rt«»^wki^ww:'w«'<wi*''wt»t'*'"»' PETITIONER ^S^f^ •^^^ Ram Kumar Namdev^ Son of late Shri Suryadeen Namdev^ aged aboufc 63 yeQrs^ Retired Asst^ Vefeenary Field Gfficer^ resident of Ring R^ad Namna kala^ Ambikapuri^ Distt $ Surguja (CG) VERSl® RESFONmN'i®: w^-'' 1. State of Chhattisgarh through fcte Secretar yf^. General AdministrQtiserv- Department^ D^K^S^ Bhawan^ Raipur, 2» ?I?h-e,Director^ Vetenary Services/ Raipur^ Bislt Raipur ( c G 5, 3e The Dy<» Director^ Vetenaxy Servxces^' Ambikapur^. Distt ; Surguje ( C.G. ) 4e Shri. 2^'L* Gupta^ Assisfc.ant Vetenary Field Officer^ AmbikQpur^ Distt : .Surguja ( C.G. ) .^^«S^3^£2S5-^2S£^--.-1S^1I1J3£.^^S.^OSSS22252E-^ I]^^.!!^^S£H^S^..S.JE;]c^.i..^S£ICT5^:-^»^S.^2^<^E.-p^^ ^AAA....ISSS_.-_—._^.-.«-..^._»— :3^ XI-HC—78 -ysf-^-raT^q,-^-^^^ f^Tra'y .^..•.f.:....3..?..?.0./..3-:0..^ ^s i^'q-5R7(-^m3si^r) 2_7.1,2QQ5 Shri V.K.Pandey, counsei fo| of higher pay scale was giyen to 19.4.1999 vide Annexure P~l 'm w fixation is aiso filed as Annexurq '^p£if^rr'mwlf "ff .^^ffN^TOT the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh, 5ovefnment Advocate for the State, Heard on the question of atimission* Learned counse! for th^ petitioner submits that th© petitioner was working as Assist|snt Veterinary Field Officer and hos retired on 30.9.2001. By c^i order dated 23.3.2003, benefit |the petitioner with effect from pich the name of the petitioner is at serial No. 131. He aiso submi|S's that the benefit of higher pay scaie has a!so been given to res^ondent No.4 whose name appears at serial No. 125 in the aforesajd order and the actual order of P-2. This benefit of higher pay scale was not extended to the tfetitioner and no reason has been 'l assigned for the same, During the course of arg Ijments, iearned counsei for 'the petitoner pryas that the petition^r may be given an opportunity to fiie G representation before the No*3 shouid be directed to decid jrespondent No,3 ond respondent B the same in accordance with law in a stipulated period giyen by thi^ Court. ^f^i^r'ft^N' 'OTT ^II^T ^W^ ^~^r ^I^IKrl^ ^Tll^4J<o/[®lQlt^^< __ ^--P,,,33,: ~^T^¥T^^ ('^3^^) not opposed by counse! for the ^I^T^Rh 'HFf^ff ^ fe^ Tf^^R ^4RrH3H^T This iimited prayer of l^arned counsei for the petitioner is State. The prayer is allowed, It is directed that th|e petitioner shall fiie a detaiied representation alongwith a cop^/ of this order and a copy of writ petition before the respondenlj concerned authority vested wi|'h the powers as the case may be, shall decide the s'ame as earl psriod of 4 months from t|ie date of receipt/filing of the representation. The order shall be a grievGnces raised by the petitio|ier in the representation, With the aforesaid ovse disposed of, Certified copy as per rul^s. No. 3 and respondent No3 or the as possibb preferrabiy within a reasoned order, replying all the t'vations, the petition stonds finally Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge GRPRJ—FS/350—12/2000—50,000. ^