/5/ " ! wag,» I ”3W0% ;I% %." HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 6844 of2008 : Saiyad Anwar Ali Age abou§ 42 years, S/o Saiyad Raipur Ahmad Distt. Ali Rf'o Raipur C/I8 (C.G.) Sector ~ 5 Devandra Nagar, : Regional Transport Authority, Through the (CG) Secretary, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTII U HON OF B‘JDIA PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. A Present: Shri Somkam Verma, Advocate for the petitimer. Shri Bhaskar Payasi, Paxlel Lawyer for the State/respondent. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 06 day of December, 2008) Learned counse} appealing for the pemioneg on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits ai this stage. However, the respondent-authority may be directed to consider and decide his pending application dated 26.08.20G8 (Azmexure P/l) in accordance with law, 2. Shri Payasi, leamed Panel Lawyer for the respondent submits that there is no reason asto Wily the representation ofthe petitioner, as stated above should not be considered expeditiousiy. Shri Payasi submits that the above-stated representation shali be considered and-decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period oftwo week norm the on its own merits, as expeditiousiy as possibie. date ofreoeipt of a copy ofthis order. In View of the clear statement made by learned counsel appearing for the respondent, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing remains to be adjudicated. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. I Sdl- ~ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ami: /