iw -Ai Sinyle Bench C ^aoZ— In the Hon'Ue Hish Court of Judicature ofChhattissarh at BUaspurfC.G.^ W.P.NO. <=rs6£ 2006 fc- Petitioner Respondents ^ ^)OAiy ,^%^ 'o '..'•'. Narendra K.umar Chandrakar, aged 45 yrs.^. Son of Shri Itwari Lal Chandrakar, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Girls Primaiy School, Chandkhim, R/o Village Aanda, Tahsil & District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS -1. The State Govemment of Chhattisgarh,^ ;/ Through - The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Departmenf Mimstiy, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^'^y 2. ^ <v>" f»-' Distnct Education OfGcer, Durg . , <u/^.,g-- cf'P". , . <?<u'^ 3. Block Education OfGcer DistrictDurg (C.G.) t?w Writ Petition Under Articles 226/227 ofThe Constitution Oflndia for the issuance ofWRIT in the nature ofMANDAMUS certiorari, Prohibition and for other suitable writ or writs, order or orders. direction or directions. The petitioner most respectfully fumishes the particidars ofthe writ petition as under: - ^ HI6H COURT OF CHHATTTSeARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (s) No. 5066 of 2006 Petitioner Narendra Kumar Chandrakar Versus Respondents The State Sovernment of Chhattisgarh &others 1. Singte Beneh: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sotish «. Agnihotri. Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the Petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, &y. ©ovt.Advocate for the respondents/State. OR D E R (18th September, 2006) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that while working as Assistant Teacher, the petitioner has gone on training to improve his qualifications on his own expenses and acquirec! B.T.I. Examination Certificate in the year 1992 from the BoQrd of Higher Secondary Education, Madhya Pradesh, 2. According to learned counse! for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 Ctl) MPJR-C6 96). This Court in the case of Yoishwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B.T.I. r Examination Certificate on his own expenses, are covered by the circular dated 24.12.98 (Annexure P/2) issued by the State Sovernment of Madhya Pradesh 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner furthsr submits that the fccts <md question of lcw involved in the present co.se are squarely covered by decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. AAunicipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), to which learned counse! oppearing for the respondents fairly concedes cuid agrees with the averment made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Ynshwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. AAuriicipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.T.I. Examination Certificate on his own expenses or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satis ibow jud&e 'haku"