IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.455 of 2003 (M/B) Birham Singh S/o Sri Attar Singh, R/o 174/2, Prempuri, Muzaffarnagar & 51 others. …………. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Secretary, Transport Department, Civil Secretariat, Dehradun. 2. State Transport Authority, Uttaranchal, Dehradun, Through, its Secretary. 3. The Additional Transport Commissioner. Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 4. Assistant Transport Officer (Administration/ Enforcement), Haridwar, Uttaranchal. ………. Respondents None for the petitioners. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for the respondents. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Petitioners’ counsel absent. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. On 29.06.2006 also, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners. 3. In view of the matter, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 4. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 04.07.2006 04.07.2006 G