Q_ff ^^^^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S.) N0. 3 ^^. 3.^^ PETITIONERS /.^' ^/ \s^ ^^y ^\f^7 t/yy 4:/ 1, Harishankar Choubey aged about 30 years, S/o Shri Narendra Nath Choubey presently working as Chowkidar in Government Polytechnic Collage Ambikapur, Djstt. Surguja (C.G.) Rakesh Puri, aged about 35 years, S/o Premchand Puri, presently working as Hammal jn Government Polytechnic Collage Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) 3. %v^ '^Sl ^fiase^,"-^ 4. ^'' Rajesh Kumar Dwivedi, aged about 38 years, S/o Shri Rohini Prasad . Dwivedi, presently working as Mali in Government Polytechnic Collage Ambikapur., Distt. Surguja (C.G.) Santosh Dewangan,, aged about 38 years, S/o Shri Nathuram Dewangan, presently working as Chowkidar in Government Sy^technic Collage Ambikapur ff?^t. Surguja (C.G.) q; 5. Parmeshwar, aged about 37 years, S/o Shri Sarpanch Ram, presently working as Hammal in Government Polythenic Collage Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1.' State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Technical Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Addl. Director Technical Education Woman Polytechnic Collage Premises Bron Bazaar, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Principal Government Polytechnic Collage Ambikapur^ Distt. Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT / WRITS OR ORDER / ORDERS OR DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS OF THE LIKE \dw| <^|«|«^,tpTcTltl<l<?, Rcl)l1<iy< *11*1ril fS^W " l'a'M'B^I'^"^""sr""'y"a/"/'"N-•--"-• 3TT^9TtRRP (4c|i^6|«£;) ^20 3TT^9TcpTR^ich ^8ff3TT^9Tri?^icb \5- Sjnha ?^fTW;Hf^T3n^5T SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra cpi^Fojl^i *ii^oV^'I^ld <<Ri^i<< ^3Tf^T3TT^5T flohan Shrivastava. J. 27.01.2010 Shri N.K. Chatterjee, c^unsel forthe petitioners. Shri A.V. Shridhar, Pai|iel Lawyer for the State/respondents. Heard. | ' Grievance of the petitit>ners is that they are not being extended the benefrt ofthe order of Annexi|re P-2 dated 15th December, 1992 regarcting grant of regular pay-scale. May, 2005 granting benefit similarly situated employees. | Learned counsel for tflie petitioners submite that though they have been making representation^ from 2007, they have failed to evoke any "hey placed on record the order dated 30th of the order dated 15th December, 1992 to response. Learned counsel for tll the petitioners would be lo| decision would be taken. Th< le respondents submits that the grievance of sked into by the Competent Authority and said statement is taken on record. It is directed that r^spondent No.1 shall take decision on the representations made by the|petitioners by calling necessary records from the respondent No.3, within ^ period of 4 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. | With these directions, fhe petition^stand disposed of. It is made clear that the merits of the case. t is Court l^ias not expressed any opinton on ./ Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge