IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 704 of 2002 1. Sonabai Sattu Patil 2. Housabai Shripati Chougule 3. Yesabai Ramu Patil 4. Gunga Sakharam Patil 5. Krishna Ramu Patil ..... .. Appellants V/s Bapu Genu Patil ... Respondent Shri A.Y.Sakhare for Appellants CORAM:S.R.SATHE,J. DATED:20th June 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. :- 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the appellant. The original defendant against whom decree for injunction was passed by the trial Court and confirmed by first appellate court has filed the present appeal. The trial Court held that the plaintiff is in actual possession of he suit property and contention of the defendant that by virtue of the earlier suit No.5/1954, she is in possession was negatived. Even the first appellate court has also confirmed the said finding of fact. There is nothing to indicate that the said finding is perverse or is against the evidence on record. 2. There is no substantial question of law involved in the matter. Hence the appeal is dismissed in limine. ( S.R.SATHE,J)