G) M‘ paw $§M$LE EEE‘mH IN THE HIGH COURT OF CPH‘IATTISGARHAT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. g§<55 OF 2010 K Suman Khare , S/o Late Shri Prem Narayan Khare, aged about 56 years, Occupation~ Service, posted as Deputy Commissioner , at Municipal Corporation, Korba , R/o Nagar Nigam Colony, Kosabadi, Korba, Tahsil and District- Korba (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. V State Of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary,‘ Urban Administration 85 Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.), The Under Secretary, Chhattisgarh Government, Urban Administration 85 Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.), Commissioner cum Diregtor, Directorate of Urban Administration & Development, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District— Raipur, (C.G.). Deputy Director, Sthaniya Nidhi Sum Parikshak, Korba, District— Korba, (C.G.). PETITIONER Development, Regional Office, Bilaspur (CG). The Collector, Korba, District Korba (CG). The Joint Director, Urban Administration and if 7. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Korba, District— Korba, (C.G.). ,y ’ 8.x The Deputy Director, Esthaniya Nidhi Sapariksha, Ghantaghar, Korba, District— Korba (C.G.). WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I'I'ISGARH A'l‘ BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3585 of20.10 WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION FO INDIA $3: Hon’blc‘ SIFI Sam}: K. Awihatry J. Present: shri Awadh 'I‘ripathi, Advocate for the pennoner Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Government Advocate for the State; Shri B.D.Guru, Advocale for the respondent- Municipal Carparatian, Korba. ORDER ORAL (Passed an 23 day of Jam, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appeadng for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was working on the post of Deputy Cmnmissionet. By the impugxed order dated 13.7.2010 (Annexure P/l), the petitionef‘" was Iransferred hem Korba,rand posted at a lower post in Municipal Corporation, Raipur. Thus, the impugned tramfer order is bad. illegal and vitiated.. Shri Dwivedi, learned State counsel fairly submits that the initial promotion of the petitioner on the post of Deputy Commissioner was cancelled, which was questioned before this Court in W.P..(S) No. 2608I2010. The said order of cancellation of promotion was quashed by this Court Vide order, dated 2l.04.2(}11, thus, the petitioner continues on the promoted post 'of Deputy Commissioner. Thus, the impugned transfet order requires‘to be ‘ moditied as it is indisputable that by the impugned order, she was placed on a IOWer post. In view ofthe above stated facts and submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, the impuged order dated. 13.7.2010 (Annexure P/l) in respect of the paitioner is quashed, reserving liberty to theState to passorder afiesh, if so advised, in public interest and. administrative. exigency. ' - 4. With the aforesaid order, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- w Satish K. Agnihotri 9 Judge PETI’I‘IONER : Suman Khm. / 4‘ D VERSUS RESPONDENI’S : Staw ofChhattisgarh & Others.