IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 1054 of 2008 Jackline Peter w/o Shri Solomen Peter ........ Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ........ Respondents Pawan Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. for State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. for State. 2. Learned Addl. G.A. for the State submits before this Court that is has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit that the police has completed the investigation and after completion of investigation the police has found that there is no prima-facie case against the petitioner. It was further submitted that the police has submitted the final report before the Circle Officer concerned. It was further submitted that in view of above the writ petition filed by petitioner seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him has, now, become infructuous. As such, the police is likely to submit the final report before the competent court in the near future. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 09.01.2009 LSR