IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR C.A.F. NO.1842/2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1260/2009 THE REGIONAL MANAGER MSRTC ..VS.. SMT. MEENA AJAY SINGH AND OTHERS WITH F.A. NO.823/2009 [MEENA AJAY SINGH..VS.. THE REG. MANAGER] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr.R.S. Charpe, advocate for appellant Mr.N.A. Biyala, advocate for respondent no.1 & 2 CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATE : 23.09.2011. Heard learned counsel for the rival parties. Prima facie I find that the claimants cannot be allowed to withdraw the entire amount as prayed in this application. However, looking to the fact that the daughter of the deceased is pursing her education and she wants to go for professional education and further the widow and daughter are having no source of income, in my opinion 50% of the amount if allowed to be withdrawn, would satisfy the need of the claimants. Hence I make the following order: ORDER The civil application is partly allowed The claimants / respondent no.1 & 2 are permitted to withdraw 50% of the amount deposited in this court. It is made clear that the claimants would not be allowed to withdraw any further amount hereinafter. The demand draft be issued in the name of mother – respondent no.1, The balance amount may be invested in a nationalized bank, as per the standing orders. The civil application stands disposed of. JUDGE SMP