1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 114 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 38 OF 2008 IN PETITION NO. 1035 OF 2007 Bhaskar Ratilal Bhurabhai & Anr. ... Plaintiffs. V/s. Smt. Bhavini Manish Soni. ... Defendant. Mr. Nimish Pandya a/w. Meena Shah i/b. M/s. Pandya & Co. for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Q.M. Ashfaq for the Defendant. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 16th SEPTEMBER 2009. P.C. :- The only contesting party present is the Caveator/Defendant and after hearing Mr. Pandya, learned Advocate appearing for the Plaintiffs so also Mr. Ashfaq, learned Advocate appearing for the Caveator/Defendant and considering their consent, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). However, the Plaintiffs shall have liberty to apply for amendment of the schedule after the disclosure is made and seek such other and further reliefs as are permissible in law including in terms of the present Notice of Motion. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) 2