IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1022 of 2006 SMT.SEETA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 30.07.08. The petitioner is widow of late Shri Akhilesh Prasad Singh, who died in harness on 2. 12. 2003, because he was suffering from cancer by which he finally succumbed. The petitioner wants a direction upon the respondent Biscoman, to pay to her all the dues of which her husband entitled in terms of arrears of salary, leave pay and medial reimbursement may be even retrial dues. The Court can well visualize her mental as well as financial trauma which was the petitioner must have faced in trying to fight the ailment of the husband when he was alive. It must not have been easy for her where nothing was being paid to her husband, by the respondent. Petitioner may be correct in stating that she has huge debts in trying to meet the medical expenses of her husband. Thus in the opinion of the Court the issue requires attention of the respondents on higher priority. The court is of the view that keeping the totality of the facts and circumstance the respondents are directed that they shall extend utmost priority in working out of the liability of the payment, which the petitioner is entitled, within a period of six months with the communication of this order. The petitioner has given freedom to file her claim including medical reimbursement with supporting documents, in case the same has not been made available to the respondent The respondents as indicated as above, payment to the - 2 - petitioner on due priority without any excuse. The writ is disposed of with the direction as indicated above. M. Pal. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)