1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.102 OF 2009 Vikrant s/o Shriram Jaiswal And Others ... Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra And Others. ... Respondents. -------- Shri. Manoj Shinde, holding for Shri. V.S. Yadav, Advocate for petitioners. Shri. K.B. Choudhari, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & SHRIHARI P DAVARE,JJ. DATE: 23rd SEPTEMBER 2009 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a statement of one of the petitioners was recorded in relation to an accident between the jeep and the ST bus on 2 26-8-2007. Thereafter, a false supplementary statement was alleged recorded on 19-9-2007 of one of the petitioners by the investigating officer which supplementary statement, according to the counsel, is not given by any of the petitioners. This defence could be raised in the appropriate forum i.e. in the trial before the Criminal Court or in the claim petition, if any, filed before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. 3) In exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution no interference is called for. 4) The writ petition is dismissed. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ crwp.102.09