IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13732 of 2010 MD.NIZAMUDDIN ANSARI, aged 64 years, son of Late Munshi Mian, resident of Village Sahejani, P.O. Hasan Bazar, P.S. Piro, District Bhojpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Water Resources Department, Sinchai Bhawan, Patna. 2. The Secretary to Govt., Minor Irrigation, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Provident Fund Directorate, Bihar, Pant Bhawan, Patna. 4. The District Provident Fund Officer, Aurangabad. 5. The Chief Engineer, Mechanical, Water Resources Deptt., Old Secretariat, Barrack, Patna. 6. The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Mechanical Circle Gaya, Camp, Dehri. 7. The Executive Engineer, Irrigation, Mechanical Division, Aurangabad. 8. The Chief Engineer (South), Tube Well Sector, Minor Irrigation Department, Sheikhpura, Patna. 9. The Executive Engineer, Tube Well Division, Arrah. 10. The Executive Engineer, Tube well Division, Buxar. 11. The Executive Engineer, Tube Well Division, Gaya. 12. The Executive Engineer, Tubewell Division, Monghyr. 13. The District Provident Fund Officer, Monghyr. 14. The District Provident Fund Officer, Gaya. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 25.8.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation from the post of Junior Engineer - 2 - while working under respondent no.7, the provident fund dues have not been paid in full and the differential amount of leave encashment has also not been paid. Learned counsel for the State submits that the claims of the petitioner made in the writ application are not clear. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Executive Engineer, Irrigation, Mechanical Division, Aurangabad (respondent no.7) with regard to the grievances for payment of differential amount of leave encashment.The petitioner also proposes to file a separate representation before the District Provident Fund Officer, Aurangabad (respondent no.4), with a copy each to respondent no.9 to 14, so far as the claim for the payment of remaining provident fund dues is concerned. In case such separate representations are filed stating distinctly the details of his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the respective grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representations be - 3 - considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representations, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled at the earliest and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)