IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 373 of 2008 (M/S) Abdul Malik and three others. …… Petitioners. Versus Yunus S/O Mohd. Imam, R/O Village Dandabhaneda, Pargana Manglore, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar and another. … Respondents. Sri Lokpal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. Sri Siddhartha Sah, learned counsel for the respondent no.1. Date July 23, 2008. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard Sri Lokpal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri K.P.Upadhyay, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent no. 1 and Sri L.K.Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and perused the record. This writ petition has been filed for issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned orders dated 7-6-2007 passed by District Deputy Director of Consolidation/Collector Haridwar (for short D.D.C.), whereby the Revision No. 715/2003 under Section 48 of the Consolidation of Holdings Act has been dismissed. Petitioners have also assailed the order dated 16-2-2002 passed by the Settlement Officer Consolidation, Haridwar in Appeal No. 781, whereby the appeal of the respondent no.1 was allowed and the order dated 2-8-1996 passed by the Consolidation Officer Roorkee Central was set aside. Learned counsel for the respondent no.1, Sri Siddhartha Sah has informed the Court that the controversy involved in the present writ petition stood already resolved by this Court vide order dated 3-1-2008 passed in Writ Petition No.779 of 2 2007 (M/S) Smt. Sanjeeda Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation and another. That writ petition was preferred by Smt. Sanjeeda against the same impugned order passed by the D.D.C. A copy of the order dated 3-1-2008 has been annexed as Annexure CA-1 to the counter affidavit filed by the respondent no.1. Learned counsel for the respondent no.1 has urged that this writ petition may also be dismissed on merits in terms of the said order. I have perused the order dated 3-1-2008 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 779 of 2007 (M/S). The present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 3-1- 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly conceded to this fact. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in terms of the order dated 3-1-2008 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 779 of 2007 (M/S), Smt. Sanjeeda Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation/Collector, Haridwar and another. Costs easy. Interim order dated 28-2-2008 is vacated. ( B.S.Verma, J. ) RCP 3 4 5