IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2011 / 20TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21890 of 2011(I) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SAMSON, G.S.NIVAS, SREENIVASAPURAM P.O., VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. (SUB REGISTRAR, NAGAROOR). BY ADVS. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP, SRI.SREEKANTH S.NAIR. RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. SASIDHARAN NAIR, SUB REGISTRAR, ATTINGAL - 695 101. 3. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, SUB REGISTRAR, VARKALA - 695 141. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.21890/2011 I APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR GENERAL TRANSFER 2011. P2: COPY OF THE G.O.(P) 12/04/P&ARD DTD. 10/09/2004. P3: COPY OF THE ORDER OF GENERAL TRANSFER DTD. 6/07/2011. P4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD.11/07/2011 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE Kss C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 21890 OF 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T This writ petition has ben filed mainly challenging Ext.P3 order of transfer to the extent it orders transfer of the petitioner to Varkala Sub Registry. The petitioner is presently working as Sub Registrar in Attingal. He is due to retire from service on 31.3.2012. In the said circumstances, claiming the benefit of Clause 13 of Ext.P2 Government Order he has submitted an application. The contention of the petitioner is that the said request of the petitioner was ignored while issuing Ext.P3 order of transfer. In the said circumstances, raising his grievance, the petitioner has already preferred Ext.P4 representation before the first respondent. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader. Considering the fact that the petitioner has already raised his grievance against Ext.P3 as also the non consideration of his claim for a suitable posting in view of Clause 13 of Ext.P2 before the first respondent through Ext.P4 representation, I am inclined to WPC.No.21890/2011 : 2 : dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. Needless to say that person/persons who are likely to be effected in case of a favourable consideration of Ext.P4, shall also be put on notice before considering Ext.P4 representation. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A To Judge