REVN.239-08 - 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (St.) No. 239 OF 2008 Mr. Surjit Singh Sahani ...Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents *** Mr. V. P. Vaze, for the Applicant. Mr. D. R. More, APP for the Respondent-State. *** CORAM: V. M. KANADE J. DATE : NOVEMBER 29, 2010 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. None appears on behalf of respondent No.2 though served. A complaint was filed for committing the offence during the period 1983 to 1991. The matter was pending since 2006. The trial Court thereafter was pleased to dismiss the complaint since the complainant did not remain present for framing the charge. When the charge was framed on 11-8-2006, the complainant, however, did not lead evidence. Though the summons was served on the panch, he did not remain present. Bailable warrant issued against him was not served. In view of this, the complaint was dismissed. I do not REVN.239-08 - 2 - find any infirmity in the order passed by the trial Court. The criminal revision application is accordingly dismissed. [ V. M. KANADE J.]