0§\W* IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 3M§&E QEMW3 WRIT PETIT10N(S) No. 173M /2010 / NEELKANTH SAHU S/o Late Shri. Bhagirathi Sahu Aged about 60 years, Employed as Unskilled Assistant, O/o Executive Engineer, E&M, LM-, Tube Well and Gate Sub-Division, Water Resources Department, BALOD Dist. Durg (CG) STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Through : The Secretary, General Administration Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, RAIPUR— 492001 (CG) The Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, RAIPUR — 492001 (CG) The Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Department, Shivnath Division, DURG 49 1 001 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / r ,5 7,.7 , z / PETITIONER .3.: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. PRI 5 TI 09-13—2019: Shri B.P.Ra’o, ccunsel for the p Shri Sumesh Bajaj, G.A. for th i Grievance of the petitioner presently he is working as Unskilled department. According to the petitio KER DIWAKER titioner. State. the present petition is that sistant in the water resources ner, he is entitled for the ’I‘ime Bound Promotion (first kramonnatij but the same has not been extended to him. State counsel points out that from the petition it is not clear as to whether the petitioner has ever approached the competent authority and therefore the petitioner ought to have first approached the resps. 2 85 3 for redressal of his gievanoe and thereafter he would have filed a petition before this Court Counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a authority. He however submits deciding his representation as representation before the competent that direction may be issued for expeditiously as possible. Accordingly, the petitioner 1 petition with the aforesaid liberty. s permitted to withdraw this In the eventuality of making representation by the petitioner Within a period of three weeks form the date of receipt of copy of this order, it is expected from the authority concerned to decide the same Within a further period of three months from the date of its receipt. It is made oleaa‘ztha'f‘ithi‘s :Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation strictly i1 accordance with law. s/ . Yo“ sudge /. xv ’31.? // / /// // “ker sal’ Biwake" I ’ s Wm NRU..VD’I “(é (o gi 200 mm W 311%31 WW 311%?! mawm W WWW ma? 1?WWI % 3W 811W