PER ETITION %"\; HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTI$GARH i BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 6484 OF 2008 M/s‘ Simplex Engineering & Foundry Works Pvt. Ltd., A Company registered under the lndian Companies Act, 1956 through its Director Smt. Lata V. Shah, W/o Shri Vijay H. Shah, aged 65 years‘ R/o Industrial Estate, N‘andini Road, Bhilai, Tahsii & District Durg. Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Principal Secretary. Department of Urban Administration, Dau Kaiyan Singh Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). si RS E$PONDENT Municipai Corporation, Bhilai, through its Commissioner, Bhiia'i, District Durg (CG). 3. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, District Durg (CG). (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lnclia) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate with Shri Yashrat Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer‘for the State! respondent No.1. Shri H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Rinki Tamrakar, Advocate for the respondents No.2 8: 3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 215‘ day of November, 20%) With the consent of teamed counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finally. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that some person is making illegal construction on the plot allotted to the petitioner in Sirsa Road, Contractor Colony, Bhilai. The petitioner has made several applications and the last application was made on 12-1 1-2008 (Annexure—P/1 1) requesting the Commissioner, Municipa Corporation, Bhilai, to stop the illegal construction, as the plot in l _. b/ ‘ C2E§? question is anotted to the petitioner. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, has not taken any steps and has not passed any order on the said application. The unauthorized construction is going on rapidiy. 3) in View of the foregoing, the Commissioner, Municipai Corporation, Bhilai, is directed to examine the above-stated appiications made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with iaw and on its own merits, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Gowri in view of the foregoing, according to iearned counsel for the petitioner nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4) 5) Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. 6 Consequently, l.A.No.1 for interim relief stands disposed of. ) saw Satish K. Ag“"‘°"‘ Judge