IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 587 of 2009 (M/S) Alka Chauhan …….. Petitioner Versus Keemti Lal Sharma and another …….. Respondents ………. Mr. Parikshit Sainil, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Purohit, Advocate for respondent no. 2.. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C. J. After hearing Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the petitioner and upon perusal of the material placed on record, I am convinced that the petitioner is not entitled to the relief sought by her. The petition is dismissed in limine. (V. K. Gupta, C. J.) 23.04.2009 A