IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48871 of 2008 AJAY MAHTO S/o late Sukan Mahto Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 24.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is husband and general and omnibus allegations have been levelled against all the family members, including this petitioner. Some of the family members have already been granted bail by this Court. But after that, a single prosecution witness has been examined, who turned hostile, indicative of the fact that there is some tempering otherwise and allegation is there, may be vague. Participation more responsibly is there on the petitioner. So, he deserves no bail. Accordingly, the application is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)