IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos. 9840, 10017, 10022, 10058, 16221,16366 and 16564 of 1999 W.P. No. 9840 of 1999 Between: M/s GKS Kalsi Constructions, Rep by its Partner, Sri Charanjit Singh, Visakhpatnam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Commissioner of Labour, Dept of Labour, Govt of AP, Steel Plant, Visakhapatnam. 2 M/s Pantulu Constructions Company Private Ltd., rep by its MD., 129/130, Mangalagiri Shopping Complex, New Gajuwaka, Visakhpatnam. 3 B.N.Sharma S/o Raj Dev Sharma C/o VMSW.Uion, D.No. HB-12/3, HSCL. Colony, Appikonda, Visakhpatnam. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records in the award dt 5-2-98 in ID No. 82/94 on the file of the Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court Visakhpatnam & quash the same Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.RAJAGOPAL REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition Nos. 9840, 10017, 10022, 10058, 16221,16366 and 16564 of 1999 Common Order: It is submitted by the learned counsel, appearing for both the parties, that the subject matter of these writ petitions is squarely covered by a judgment of this Court passed in W.P. No. 35934 of 1998, dated 25.01.2008, and in view of the same, the writ petitions are to be allowed. In view of the reasons recorded in the aforesaid judgment and following the same, these writ petitions are also allowed. The impugned awards are quashed. No order as to costs. _____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. Date: 23.01.2009 Nsr