IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 498 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA ============================================================== ============================================================== SAURASHTRA UNIVERSITY &2 - Petitioner(s) Versus SHAMJIBHAI BHANAJIBHAI TALSANIA &5 - Respondent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : MR JR NANAVATIfor Petitioner No(s).: 1,2. NOTICE SERVED BY DS for Respondent No(s).: 1,2,3,5. NOTICE UNSERVED for Respondent No(s).: 4. ============================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 of any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? 1. 2. CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA Date : 22/06/2005 ORAL JUDGMENT Mr. J.R.Nanavaty, learned advocate of the petitioners state that this petition has become infructuous. He, therefore, urged to pass appropriate orders. In view of the aforesaid statement made by Mr. Nanavaty, learned advocate of the petitioners, this petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous with no order as to costs. Rule is discharged. Interim relief granted earlier stands vacated. (A.M.Kapadia,J) Jayanti*