IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 8947 of 1997 Between: Dorothy Edenezer alias Dayasheela W/oH.No.10-3-18/4/1 secunderabad-500026. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 TH GOVT. OF A.P. REP. TECHNICAL EDUCATION BURUGULA RAMA KRISHNA BUILDINGS HYDERABAD 2 BISHOP OF MEDAK DIOCESE AND CHAIRMAN DIOCESAN EXECUTIVE COMM REP. RT.REV.B.P.SUGANDAR CHURCH OF SOUTH INDIA, DIOCESSAN OFFICE, OLD LANCER LINES, SECUNDERABAD-500026 .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents no.1 and 2 to reinstste the petitioner with effect from the date of dismissal i.e. august,1996 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MRB.BHASKAR BENNY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.S.SRI RAM REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner represents that the writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner with effect from the date of dismissal i.e. August, 1996. The learned counsel further represents that the petitioner was reinstated into service and died. Therefore, the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous and no further orders are required to be passed. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH Date: 25-08-2008 LSK