[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2194 OF 2008 Pappu Suresh Salve ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Ms.Sarojini Upadhyay advocate (appointed) for applicant Ms.A.A.Mane A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 20, 2008 DATE : NOVEMBER 20, 2008 DATE : NOVEMBER 20, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is facing prosecution in Sessions Case No. 47 of 2002 which is pending before the learned Sessions Judge at Nasik. The said case pertains to CR No.183 of 2003 of Sinnar Gramin Police station. 3. The grievance of the applicant is that even though his advocate was absent, the case had proceeded. It is seen that there are five accused [-2-] in the said case. As the learned advocate for the applicant did not remain present, finally advocate from the legal aid panel was appointed to represent the applicant. After the advocate has been appointed to represent the applicant, no grievance has been made by the applicant. Trial in the said case is over and the matter is now kept for judgment. Looking to the above facts, no case is made out for interference at this stage. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]