$EN§1LE @ENCF5 @ C’¢//Wk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATISGARH AT BILASUR. (a WRIT PETITION N0. ‘TBHY OF 2005 /’?x ANITvIA SHARMA PETITIONER: D'Io SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R10 SIMGA (VILL. & P0) RAIPUR DIST. C.G, STATE. VERSUS RESPONDENT: 1) STATE OF C.G. ' / i‘E TRU SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPT. DKS BHAWAN, RAIPUR C.G. STATE. 2) PRESIDENT, NAGAR PANCHAYAT, SIMGA, (VIII. & PO. RAIPUR DIST. C.G.STATE. / 3) PRESIDENT SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE, SIMGA, (VILL. & PO) RAPUR DIST C.G. STATE. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT (S) / ORDER IS) / DIRECTION (S), ETC. Xl>HC-78 mmqi$ ..................................... E2003“ Lu. P. 31 I§ anéet W5 (WE) 311%?1 i5! iéaim 31m: Wm; mmWWQI mmm#wmn $31Fv§qanéa 27.7.2005 Shri KR. Nair, caunsel for th6 pEtL'tioner. Shn' Akhjl Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for the State; I.A.No.613112005 This is an application for urgent hearing. The matter is taken up on Board. The application stands disposed o£ W.P.No. 3 1 1‘5 I 2005 counsel for the petitioner and Shri Akhil Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for the State. Heard Shri KR. Nair, r is that she was a candidate for the I and Grade-III in Nagar Panchayat, Shimga the recruitment of w ich took place in the month of May 2005. She possessed the r quisite qualihcation and experience but she was not called for in erview. Shli Nair submits that she C.E.O.. on 3.6.2005 requesting for a call letter, but no rep was given to her on The said representation. lt is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the other candidates Who we lesser qualified and having no experience in teaching, were alled for interview and were selected for appointinent as Shiksha armi under M.P.(C.G.) Municipality Shiksha Karmi (Recruitmen and Conditions of Service) rules, The case ogthe petitio post of Shiksha Karmi Grade has given a representation to l After perusal of these rules, it appears that there is a provision of appeal vide Rule 2 of the aforesaid rules. Hence, the t m - e r ' W31 W (WW) mmnm'ti'ié‘étm $W snéQT mmma anéa petitioner has an alternati‘m :TSmedy to raise her grievance before In this View of the matter, when there is an alternative and efflcacious remedy available t) the petitioner, I am not inclined entertain this writ petition at 1his stage. The petition stands dismissed. However, it is made clear that if the peu'tioner nles an appeal and any adverse order {is passed and the petitioner is d:.ssatisfled with the order, she may be at liberty to CO’me to this Court for appropriate relief. With the aforesaid liberty, the petition é ;tands finally disposed of. ///'/’ / ‘SP/FS/ 005 — 20,000 {‘3’ b: aw \q" to / /