- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4079 OF 2004 ... Union of India through Central Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai. ...Petitioner v/s. Nandu Krishna Wani ...Respondent ... Mr.T.J.Pandian for the Petitioner. Mr.S.V.Marne for Respondent. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & V.M.KANADE, JJ. DATED: 26TH MARCH, 2008 P.C.: By this petition the Petitioner/Union of India - 2 - challenges the order dated 28-1-2004 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.664 of 2003. By that order the Central Administrative Tribunal has directed the Petitioner to pay the subsistence allowance at the rate of 75% of the salary to the Respondent from 3-12-1998 to 16-4-2003. It is an admitted position that for the aforesaid period the Respondent was paid subsistence allowance at the rate of 60%. What has been done by the Central Administrative Tribunal, it has enhanced the subsistence allowance from 60% to 75%. It is also a common ground that this order has been complied with and it is also an admitted fact that the Respondent has retired from the government service. 2. In our opinion, in these peculiar facts and circumstances, no interference is called for in the order impugned. Petition, therefore, fails and is dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (V.M.KANADE, J.)