IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15021 of 2009 MURARI PRASAD RAO Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 30.06.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that if the seized vehicle was stolen one, then also petitioner is neither the seller nor the purchaser. His presence is only there in the dealing of sell and purchase and he is apprehending his arrest. In those circumstances, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 144 of 2007 and G.R. No. 695 of 2007, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sherghati Dist-Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)