.7r~ Cf- \ao THB HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUH W.P. (Ci N0. (og /2007 e, M/S. LAXMI COLD STORAGE, Through: its Proprietor, Smt. Chandrakanta, W/o. Janaklal Goyal, Aged about 45 years, Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) ..^ \ST^<^''., ^••^>v^ ^.^\tf^ ..-•'" ^ ^lj State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Trade & Industries Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipiu- (CG) ^2} General Manager, District Trade and Industries Centa'e, Arnbikapi.tr, Sureuja, District Surguja (CG) 3] S.D.M., Ambikapur, District Su_rguja (Chhattisgarh) 4] Deputy Director, Industries Du-ectorate, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG) •<5] Coinmissioner, Industries Directorate, Chhattisgarh Raipur District Raipur (CG) ^ WMT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226 OF THE CORSTITUTION OF INDIA w~ XI-HC-78 *ii<4<ni ^ffrai 3^ .^l<llfl<<, ®Tn+f'16,Rldltiy ;:? -.cc^. .^6-. ..1°3^°9J~ ^ 200' 3ii^i ^ach ('i^^S,'6!') sn^r^iTf^fNi (WTsn^rsbiiicti <-.- ^, gTcTOTHfscrsn^r Shri Maiioj Paranjpe, Ad' Shri Vmay Harit, Dy. Ad^ Heai-d on I.A. No. 836, record. Not opposed. The appUcation is aUowei^ Heard. This petition is directed| 2006 ofAnnexure P-4 passed Maaager, District Trade aud Iii| Leamed counsel for ft| petitioner was atlotted the displ an agreeiueut was entered Aiuiexure P-1 in the raonfll oi-der inipugned, the aUotai^ petitioner has been canceUed ^ of heanng. He further subinil agreeinent, he had preferred P-6 before fhe conceraed Mini|! 11-1-2007 well withiu 30 days| through registered post hov^i considered and iTespondents| petitioner froin the allotted pr); <»il'i|?f1<fl'ltlllclTfffei^t'TfSRZK ^aTf^q'sn^r 'ocate for the petitioiier. •ocate Geueral for ftie State. 2007 for taking docuiaent on tt. Docurueut is taken on record. agaiast the order dated 22-12- ^>y the respondent No. 2-General (lustries Centre, Ainbikapur. [e petitioner subinits fhat fhe luted laad for 99 vears' lease and i4to for Uie above purpose vide ^f April, 2005, however by tbe tnt of lease iu favour of the I'ithout affording auy opportunity fhat as oer Claiise 33 of the a representation vide annexure Ister of the State Gtovenunent on |fr6ni tlie date ofiru.pugned order ;ver, the sam.e has not been are likely to dispossess the •inises. He fui-fher subinits that XI-HC-78 *11HMI Sh*11<h 3^' "t|l<llrt<), BTfltt'IS, Rldl'My . \A')~^)>^0. lO' ^ 200 3<i^i ^iaqi (iicii^ci^isr) 3ii^TqirR-<i»ti (raTail^l**li+ .-"^, B^HTmgfStTsn^T dispjised instaiit petition inay be conc.erued aufhorities to dis Annexure P-6 in accoi-daace w 1 and tiU decision of Uie repr^ not be dispossessed iu pursi dated 22-12-2006, which is n<| State. In view of the subiaissj pardes, instaiit petition is dis respondents that tiiey shall Annexure P-6 on its own inerit heariiig to the petitioner. appropriate order is passed 01 P-6, fb.e petitioner shall not t| preinises. The petition is accordin^ly Consequently, M.W.P. 684/2007 stand disposed of. tii^FCT'fl-i tiiti(iTfftei^l'<Fai+<;i<. ^sri^iTsn^T of with a direction to fhe Ipose of the representation of ^fh the agreeirient of Anuexure P- ;sentation, the petitioner should liance of order of Aimexure P-4 ^t opposed by the coiuisel for the ba made bv ftie counsel for the Iposed of wifh a direction to the consider the representation of after affording an opportunity of is further directed tliat tiU the representation of Annexure i dispossessed from. the aUotted disposed of. No, 240/2007 and I.A.No. Sdl- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.