IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.3263 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.3263 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.3263 OF 2008 Anil Gawade, .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharshtra, .. Respondent. Ms Tripati Shetty, for the applicant. Mr H.S.Dediya, APP for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 14/10/2008 DATE : 14/10/2008 DATE : 14/10/2008 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard Ms.Shetty, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.Dediya, learned APP, for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.38 of 2008 of Parksite Police Station, Vikhroli. The said crime has been registered against the applicant for having committed an offence punishable under sections 302, 141,142,143, 144, 147,148 and 149 of IPC. The present applicant and seven others have allegedly committed the murder of Sudhir Sathe on 3.2.2008 at 11 pm. The alleged incident of assault was witnessed by the mother of the deceased Asha Sathe. She lodged the FIR. I perused the FIR and other material placed on record. The applicant is named in the FIR and was armed with cricket-stump at the relevant time and he allegedly assaulted the deceased with stump. Ms.Shetty, learned counsel for the applicant, submitted that there are no corresponding injuries found in the post mortem notes, which could be attributed to the present applicant. I have perused the post mortem notes and, in my opinion, the submissions advanced by the learned counsel deserve to be rejected outright. The other three accused, who have been released on bail, seem to have been released on the ground that they assaulted the deceased with fist and kick blows and that they were not armed with deadly weapons. There is sufficient material on record to connect the applicant with the alleged offence. In the circumstances, this application is rejected. 3. I am informed that the charge has already been framed and the case is kept on 20.10.2008 for evidence. The trial court shall endeavour to dispose of the trial expeditiously. 4. While rejecting the application, I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case without being influenced by the observations made in this order. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)