AB 2036/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. BARUAH Heard Mr. J. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State-respondent. When this application is moved on 6.7.2011, this Court taking note of th e facts provided interim bail to the petitioner, Sri Makhan Chakraborty. As per the first information report, one Sri Mohitosh Chakraborty, an agent collector o f Sahara India Company, had taken loan for a sum of Rs.75,000/- and Rs.1,50,000/ - from one Shri Gopal Sen, Shri Gopal Sen when demanded money from Shri Mohitosh Chakraborty, he provided him a cheque for Rs.75,000/- which was later bounced b y the Bank. On enquiry, it is found that Mahitosh Chakraborty has already sold o ut his landed property at Rs.26,00,000/- to one Sri Biren Ch. Deb. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petit ioner being the father-in-law of the said Sri Mahitosh Chakraborty, is frequentl y visited by police on account of non-availability of said Mahitosh. It is submi tted that this petitioner herein is no way connected in taking of the money from Sri Gopal Sen nor has the hands in issuing the cheque for Rs.75,000/-. Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. P.P. representing the State-respondent submits tha t the materials available in the case diary do not reveal anything as against th e petitioner. In view of the non-availability of the materials against the petitioner, the interim protection provided vide order dated 6.7.2011 is made absolute. The petition is accordingly disposed of.