IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3357 of 2010. Decided on: 13th July, 2010. Shyam Lal. ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved on account of his transfer. It appears that the transfer was made on request. But the petitioner submits that he had not made any request. There will be a direction to the third respondent to look into the matter afresh in the light of the averments made in the writ petition and pass appropriate orders within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Till orders are passed, as above, interim order will continue. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 13th July, 2010 ( Justice Kuldip Singh), (tr) Judge.