WP(C) 4964/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. P. Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. N. Dhar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 6 to 13. I have also heard Ms. R. Chakraborty, learned State Counsel. The matter relates to the No confidence Motion sought to be moved agains t the petitioner by the G.P. members of Isabheel G.P. Eight members of the GP placed a No Confidence Motion requisition against the President of the G.P. i.e. the petitioner by Annexure-I letter dated 5.8.2010. Thereafter by Annexure-2 le tter dated 25.8.2010, the Secretary of the G.P. informed the petitioner that he had not received any approval from the G.P. President for convening the meeting. While it is the stand of the petitioner that on a bare perusal of Annexu re-2 letter dated 25.8.2010, would reveal that 15(fifteen) days notice time was given to the President in terms of Section 15(1) of the Assam Panchayat Act, Mr. Dhar, learned counsel for the respondents No. 6 to 13, upon a reference to the documents annexed to the counter affidavit filed by the said respondents, submit s that in fact such 15 days notice time was given. Annexure-2 to the counter affidavit is the No Confidence Motion requisit ion dated 5.8.2010, receipt of which was acknowledged by the petitioner under hi s clear signature dated 7.8.2010. The meeting having not been convened, the afor esaid request was made to the President of the Anchalik Panchayat to convene the meeting. When no such meeting was convened, the Secretary of the GP addressed t he letter dated 6.9.2010 to the Deputy Commissioner, Karimganj to convene the me eting as per the provisions of Section 15 of the aforesaid Act. The Deputy Commi ssioner in turn by his letter dated 9.9.2010 authorised the Circle Officer and E xecutive Magistrate, Patharkandi to convene the meeting. In the mean time the wr it petition was filed. It is submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid No Confidence Motion requ isition, no meeting has been held and accordingly the motion has not been acted upon. Having regard to the controversy raised, the writ petition is disposed o f directing the Deputy Commissioner, Karimganj to examine the matter and then to act in accordance with the provisions of Section 15 of the Act. Let the entire exercise be carried out as expeditiously as possible but at any rate not later t hen 31.5.2010. Writ petition is disposed of.