IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition NO. 65 of 2006 (M/B) Sandeep Kumar s/o Sri R.K. Khanna, R/o 17 Suraj Nagar. Near State Bank of India, Jwalpur, P.s.Jwalapur, District Haridwar ……… Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Senior Superintendent of Police, Haridwar, District Haridwar. 2. Station House Officer, Police Station, Jwalapur, District Haridwar. 3. Shafique s/o Late Yameen, R/o Mohalla Kassawan, P.S. Jwalapur, District Haridwar ……… Respondents ……… Sri J.S.Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri H.C. Pande, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondents, 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Sri J.S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri H.C. Pande, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Sri H.C.Pande, learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of the first information report has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation has already filed a final report before the concerning Magistrate. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 01.05.2006 01.05.2006 A