^ \£ C IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH_M*_BIIA UR W»P._ N0. l-T 6^- /2005 PETITIONER NON-APPLTC&NT. €). ^^,^..^ ;^"- ^ ^ie' \ <9^--^^ ..^'^•^f< >--""L,SWK-""- -..•••' y^^r^^ ^- s--^"^\ ^••"^ RBSPONDEtaT APPLICANT Sardar satpal Slngh s/o Late Sardar Vidayal Singh, Babra, aged about 50 years, r/o^ Chureh Road, Kedarpur , P.S. & Tehsil ATOblkapur, Bl.strict gurguja, C.G. E_R__S__U_S Jaixaath ,Siukla s/o Sni-v Bibari SbuKla, aged about 65 years, Oecapation-Retired Governaent Servant, r/o ARibikapur. Present Address; CAv.ll Iiines, Dongargarb, Bistrlct Rajnandgaon, C.G. KRrr PETCTION UNDER ARTICLE_ 227 _OF THE_CO_N,gnTUTION OP INDIA. XI-HC-22 SH^T^iT f^iwsn^r wwfffBtr 3ST ^nqRPT, s€WTS, Rlcfl'M^ an^r&Fai'WHlsa' 20-T.200S Shri A,K. Prasad, couiis^l for the petitfcner. SIui iv!. P.3. Bhatia, coui^sel for thc respondent. The petitioner Iias p;: 226/227 of Tlie Constitutio4. of Inciia qucstioamg tlie legatily, propt-iet}' ancl cort-ectiiess ot o{ Dassed bv the Rent Controliii]| petitioncrs application for sct^ has been reiected. i^rier dated 15.3-2005 (Aiinexui^ P-1) r^^j.^.-c' .?. .Onet tacts, as set out j his toffo brothers namely Iqbal oliowed bv the Reat Contji'oltut 2.1.2003 incnuoning thereid «bl<)Ic)<fl^WRTt' ff fetZt (fSRZR ^>3ri^[T3TI^T 'terred tlus petltlon und.er Article Authority, Ainbikapur whereby the iiig aside thc expanc eriction dccrce m the writ peTition, necessaiy tbr disposal of tliis writ petition a^~e ih.at fiie i^spondent liereiii filed aii application under Section 23 (^) oftlie C.G. Acconunodption Control Act, 1961 (hcreiiiafter shaU re^r to as "thc Act of 1961') beforc tlic Rent ConuwUnig Auttiorifr, Ajnbikapur agamst. tlie petitloner a-nd Siagh & Giirpal Sia.gh for eviction of house .situated at Plot Nos. 12):t5 & 1246. Tlie said application was Authorit-v vide expai-te order dated tiiat tuc petidoiier aiid his nvo f brot&crs ai'e delibei'atelv avoidtag tlie service aiid thev have reftised to take the notice. Further c^.se of the petitioner is that tlie said decree was passed without a^iy notice to fhe petitioner, therefore, (_ , i l the petitioner hagf inoved an 4ppKcation for settiiig aside tlje soine vide Aiuicxurc P--3 incntioiiihg tliercin that tlie petii.ipner cainc to 21.2.2005 pv Ms counsei iiamely Shri Sanjay Siagh, Advocate, who has rcceived the said uitbz-iisation fipxn Slui Aiul Dubey, Advocate in tlie office of Jsxiow about ttie passiag ot' (fecree on 21.2.20 ._^-^_ ('M^a^) ?—^-s ^awts XI-HC-22 'S^ '^W.Vl'l, ESTilti'IS, lelClltiy tTKTcn'aiNlch SIT^^TW f^T@53n^T giiiffiflfln an^T&RiTwfffig' —-U- Kaiiungo. . The application autl'Loatv vide order dated tli&t order tlic T3etitioiier liss i tiave iieard leamed c( mipugned oiYler. In the order it has beit |ot ttie pe&tioaer \vaa i-ejected. tsy Uie .5.3.2005 and being diosaUsfled witli lircferred fhis'pctition. ^ "tt^ ^^.^ i -t-.i^.-y '<-l-i^» -a^rf->vfi~-tt^£t r^s-y-i/^ 'i'-h.^i-s^ ~a c'^=t^i t'in.o FLUISCI iUi. U.1C {Jc.ll LiCS cUl^l iJCl USCU tllC lii3 Uyo i^rot.li.ei'o sre &^1 wiiv GXDS.rte orcier w&s 133. Autliorif,' is whouv cerverse toidiug the serv-ice deliberatelv tliat is fescd. The ordcr of'Rent CoiLtTQUiag Before passmg thc impugnef) aprilication uiider Section 23 uie pentioner m tcrms ot Uic to have inquu'ed about 'che icnow about Uie exparte ctec2| the Tirescribed pcriod of lii i- has not been oasscd m accoi 'bl'ilFi'f'ifl-f ^Wvii ff (SVt (RFKR ^i3I^>T3-n^T iu insiitioiieil th.s.t sii'ice tlis i^etiUQii.ex'' aiid contran' to tlie legal pi-ovlsions. 1 order the Rent Coiirfollmg Authority ought to liave satisned hir^i-apif \vhetiier Gie seivice of eyiction. a) offhe Act of 1961 was eiTected upon Ordsr 5 Ruies 15 to 17 c'ftjic CPC aiid if' it was aot sci'ved tn tfaat ca^e the Rent ContTulliiig Autliorit'i' ousht date on xvhich the petitioner cajne to '£e ui orcl.cr ?Q s.scei'tsiii ss. ?o wlisttigr tlie application for setting as^de that expeu-te decree was filed witliin *fs t^lP imTI'i'iC?T^r='H f1TT^<=T .E.-"A&- Raace 'wiQi law. Mr. Bhatia, coiinsel SpT the rcsponcieat at this stage aJ.ter perussl of the 1^'CQrd vers/ fa^ly subniitted Uiat he has UQ objecUon. if tlie expai-te order is set aside. however, he subm.ittecl that a direcnon be givcn to the Rc^it ControUiiig Authority to decidc thc appucation filed t>v (fae respotident hereiii under Section 23(ai of tlie Ac.t of 1961 w-ithin the specifi^d period. ^'^ll'1^1'^ [-HC-22 3^?T<BT f^TNisn^r aiiiwgfga' '3^ ^WvTf, aT!r)*]'i<s, fsifii+iy ^ 200 SIT^T S^aTW Hf?(T \ Ili vie\v of abave positioi^. tlie writ petition is aUowed, tli decree datccl 2.1.200-5 arc Auttiorin-, AmbiKapur 1s directt application of the respon'len.rl l^w- Tlis KsjQ.t CoiitTQiliiis Autj s^Dlicstioii ol tlie resi^oiicieiit tlle cis.tc of rcCdT3t of tiils oFrierl Pai-ties ai'e directed to Aiithorin', Aaibikaour on 1.8.2f to senci. Uie copy Qt Uiis Qrd-^j Authoritv'. AiiibLkauur. AU the pending appiicatiijins Certined copv as per ral^. ^irafefrr wiyfF'ff telst (f^RZR ^iarf^iTgn^r &. subniission. aiade bv Mr. Bhatia. le iiiipu^ned order as ^vell a.s ex^arte :et s.slde sS.d^ tlie Ren.t Costrolliiis fcs^-5 +^\ T-^-ry^./^^a^t/'S TT71T?^ +^~tl=l .^a-ti-^1-^^1,^.^1 ) ^^.4- -t-1-l^l :.l.l LV plVUCCl.1 vVJLlJLl U.1C t-(.i5pU5cU <J1 UIC trom ttiat stage Ui accorctaiice witQ. tiont\' is Ivirtlier d.ii'ectecl to ciecicie tiie ^viUiia a period of four uiouths froia &~ppeaT DetuX'e tu,c i'^eiit CoiitToilti'i^ D05, Meanwhile. the ofiice is dii'ected ^r Eiy speed-pqst to Kent ControUuig are stand disposcd of, Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge D 'I,"