IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN MONDAY, THE 29TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 CRP.No. 738 of 2007() --------------------- ( W.O.S.37/2005 of WAKF TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM) .................... REVN. PETITIONER/DEFENDANT ------------------------------------------------- HIDRU, AGED 72 YEARS, S/O. MAYIN,ALAYIL,ARAKKURSSI AMSOM, MANNARKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.ESM.KABEER RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS ------------------------------------------ 1. HANAFI JUMA MASJID, ARAKKURUSI AMSOM, ARAKKURSSI DESOM, MANNARKAD TALUK, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. 2. SECRETARY , HENAFI JUMA MASJID, ARAKKURUSI AMSOM, ARAKKURSSI DESOM, MANNARKAD TALUK. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.11.2010 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: VK PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. ----------------------------------- C.R.P.No.738 OF 2007 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of November, 2010 O R D E R ~~~~~~~ Pius C. Kuriakose, J. There is no representation for the revision petitioner. Sri.T.H.Abdul Aziz counsel for the respondents is present. We notice that the impugned decree passed by the Wakf Tribunal is a decree for eviction. According to us, in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Ramesh Gobindram v. Sugra Humayun Mirza Wakf [2010(3)KLT 862(SC)], the suit was not maintainable before the Wakf Tribunal. Hence, we set aside the judgment and decree and remand the suit back to the Wakf Tribunal. It is open to the respondents/plaintiffs to file necessary application under Order 10A CPC, so that, the Tribunal can return the plaint to the respondents for presentation before the proper competent court. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) (P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE) ps