IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23234 of 2011 ============================================= Hasim Mian .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ============================================= with Criminal Miscellaneous No.26418 of 2011 ============================================= Ratnesh Singh @ Ratnesh Kumar Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ============================================= with Criminal Miscellaneous No.25189 of 2011 ============================================= Birendra Kumar @ Raja .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ============================================= 4 29-11-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Informant’s husband was poisoned is corroborated by so called independent witnesses examined in paragraphs no. 14, 15 and 16, thereafter witness in paragraphs no. 114 and 115 of the case diary. They are referred on behalf of defence that none is named by them and by witnesses in paragraph no. 115 lesser number is shown may in no case doubt administration of poison at the stage that is followed by statements of the informant that deceased told her about poisoning by petitioners and others is taken as dying declaration made by the deceased to his wife who told other family members, his son and daughter. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for bail is rejected. However, Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. Shailendra Bhushan Prasad/- (Mandhata Singh, J.)