IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31792 of 2008 KRISHNA MAHTO, son of Rajvanshi Mahto, resident of Village Ubadhi Bakhari, P.S. Siswan, District Siwan ----Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. VISHWANATH MAHTO, son of Late Pritam Mahto, resident of Village Sareyan, P.S. Baniyapur,District Saran ----Opposite Parties ----------- 4. 30.3.2009 Pursuant to thee notice, opposite party no.2 has entered appearance through Vakalatnama. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and opposite party no.2 as also the State. The offence alleged against the petitioner, who is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.1084/2000, is under section 498A of the Penal Code. It is submitted that the primary allegation is against co-accused, who is the father of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner is a poor labourer working in Punjab and the complainant wants to live in Punjab along with the petitioner, who is unable to afford the cost of living in Punjab. Under such circumstances, the 2 present complaint has been filed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No.1084/2000 (Tr. No.2439/2008) within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chapra, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)