1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.247 OF 2008 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Shri K.S.Bhore, Advocate, for petitioner. Shri D.V.Tele, AGP, for the Respondent. 1. Advocate Shri Bhore states that the amount of compensation is deposited in the trial court after deducting income-tax. He cites cases of Rana Pratap Ssing vs. Land Ac quisition Officer 1998 (2) ACC 372 and Bikram Singh vs. Land Acquisition Collector, (1997) 10 SCC 243 and states that income tax ought not to have been deducted. 2. The position of Income-tax Act as on date of deposit of the amount will have to be considered. It is informed to this court that Darkhast is pending 2 and therefore the point of deduction of income tax can be taken up before the executing court. 3. In view of above, contempt petition is disposed of. Date:27/08/2009 (P.R.BORKAR, J.) pnd/cp247.08