IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.4075/2008 Decided on:24.8.2010 _____________________________________________ Bharat Singh Sen …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. B.S. Kanwar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). It has come in para 6 (vi) of the reply filed by the respondents that the case of the petitioner for promotion as Commandant from the date his junior, namely, Sh. Deepak Katyayen, was promoted, is under consideration. However, respondents have not placed any contemporaneous material on record to establish that the decision has been arrived at or conveyed to the petitioner in this regard. 2. Consequently, in view of the contents of the reply, respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Commandant, as undertaken, if not already considered, within a period of ten weeks from the date of 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. In case the petitioner is found suitable, he shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits, like arrears of salary and seniority etc. 3. In view of above direction, the petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 24.8.2010 *awasthi*