IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 159 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2816 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 2816 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 2816 OF 2006 Mrs. Savita Mukund Kelkar .... Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & ors...... Respondent. Mr. A.M.Joshi for the petitioner. Mr. M.S.Topkar for Respondent no.1. Mr. Kiran Bapat i/b Mr. Avinash Fatangare for Respdt. no.3. Mr. K.K. Malpathak i/b Mr. V.J. Bolingkar for Respondent no.5. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 8TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED; 8TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED; 8TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; Not on board. Mentioned. 1. I have decided the writ petition by judgment dated 21-2-2007. By this review application, it is brought to my notice that another learned Single Judge has taken a contrary view in a judgment reported in 2007(1) M.L.J. page 860 relying upon a Division Bench judgment of this court. It is undisputed that neither the judgment of the learned Single Judge taking contrary view, nor the Division Bench judgment was brought to my notice when I decided the writ petition. Assuming that the view taken by me is not correct in law, the said mistake cannot be corrected by entertaining the review application. The scope of the review is only to correct errors apparent on the face of record. Assuming that the order is incorrect, it cannot be corrected in review. In the result review application is rejected. .....