^7 ^^^l^ BEFORE THE M.P. ST&TE ADHINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AT JABALPUB. ORIGINAL APPLICATION N0 OF 1997 (CRIGINAL APPLICATION UMDER 3ECTION 19 CF THE M.P. STATE TRIBimALS ACT, 1985.)^ APPLICANTs RSS'PONEENTS R.B. Mishra, aged about 43 years. SQn of Shri S.R.. Mishra, Assistant Project Co-or3inator(Finance), Rajiv Gancl'hi Pratharnik Shiksha Mission, Arabikapur, Distt. Sarguja(MP). -Vs- 1. Stafce of Madhya Pradesh, Through-secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Vallabh Bhawa'Qs 3hopa1- (MP). 2• The Commis sione r » Tribal Welfare. Satpuda Bhawan, Bhopal <KP). 3. The Director, Rajiv Gandhi Prathamj.k s'nik.sha, MissJ.c'n. Gautam Bha-aan, Bhopal{MP). 4. The Coilector(Dj.strict Mlssion Coordinator), Rajiv C3an<3hi Prathgmik Shiksha Mission.Ambitepur DistriGt.Asa Sarguja (MP). 5. P.C. Prasad. Incharge Project Director, Rajiv Gandi-ij. Prathamik Shiksha M-i.3sion, Smbikapur.Distt.Sarguja (MP) • 6. Asslstant Comraissiorier, , Tribal Welfare,Ambi!tapur, District, Sargu'ja (MP). 7. Asslstant Project Administrator, Tribal Departraent.AmbikapHr, District, Sarguja (MP). ORIQIN^L APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF TH3 ADMINI3TRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985< l* Pa.rticjulars_of the Applicant: As detailed above in cause'title 2. E'art'iculars of the Responaents s As detaiied above in caase tifcle .^t^Q'. I?ii' •Bi'o^-ssaa 1 sii^ng'TR'fi* ?rai3i^»i»flra> W('1«NB Tumane ^BET^TTOTo'RI, »-fll'd<K»,firtl«y<{ ^,^?,)^-l^^ ?~ 3TI^9TV (4di^<£i) g^irw; ^fter an^?T SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra MoBan Shrwastaya, J 22-02-2010 Shri Bhaskar Payashi, couil Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Heard. In view of the averments been taken back in the origin^ Rs.24,000/- has been paid as als<] April, 1997 amounting to Rs.22,^ well as transfer order have been of as having been rendered infruc| petitioner to revive the petition, consideration. A copy of the order] <ni<i[n<fli tiinl'tfls'cl •(Kntci'c ^3lf^T3II^?T (sel for the petitioner. povernment Advocate for the State, rfiade in the return that the petitioner has place of posting and an amount of salary for the month of January, 1997 to (80/- and further that the suspension as lcanoelled, the petition is finally disposed infrucfuous. However, liberty is reserved to the lif the cause of action still survives for |be sent to the petitioner forthwith. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge