1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.480 OF 2008 Bhiwandi Nizampur Municipal Corporation.. .. Applicant Versus Smt.Shabnam Parveen Hafizulla Ansari and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.R.S.Apte, Senior Advocate for applicant Mr.Y.Sakhare i/b. M.D.Mali for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 27th April 2010. P.C.: 1] Heard Mr.Apte, learned Senior Counsel for the Corporation and Mr.Sakhare for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. 2] Having heard them at some length, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for interference with the interlocutory order of the executing court. At this stage, all that has been held by the court below is that the application for execution of the decree in favour of respondent Nos.1 to 4 is maintainable. This is just a prima facie opinion and the main execution petition is pending. Therefore, the Corporation can produce the 2 documents as are now sought to be produced, including sale deed and the sketch/ map and place before the Court all details with regard to the lands covered under the said deed. Equally, the decree holder can dispute contents of the said documents. Such an opportunity is not denied to the petitioner by the impugned order. There is no reason to interfere at this stage. Civil Revision Application is dismissed subject to this clarification. All pleas and contentions of the parties with regard to above are kept open. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)