IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 190 of 2010 Decided on: 27.08.2010 Prithvi Chand …Petitioner Versus Rajeev Sharma …Respondent. Coram: The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) : The Petitioner complains that the judgment dated 8.7.2010 passed in CWP No. 3831 of 2010 has not been complied with. In the reply, it is seen that the respondent passed order, though belatedly. 2. In view of the apology tendered for the delay caused in passing the impugned order, this contempt petition is closed without 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- prejudice to liberty to the petitioner to pursue his grievance by way of appropriate proceedings. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma) Judge. August 27, 2010 (Bhupender/K. Attri)