FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of | coram, appearance, court’s orders |Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders | WRIT PETITION NO.113/2010 Shri V.H.Dighe,A.G.P.for petitioner-State. Shri Pradeep Deshmukh h/f Shri H.A.Joshi,Adv.for respondent. .... CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & N.D.DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE : 12/4/2010. 1] The respondent Vithal Bansode applied against the post of Civil Engineering Assistant which was advertised by Water Conservation Department of the State. He appeared in a written and oral test. He passed the test,but the Department refused to appoint him on the ground that the Course of Construction Supervisor being invalid educational qualification, was not entitled to be appointed as Civil Engineering Assistant. The learned A.G.P. Shri Dighe submitted that in the light of Notification issued by the State in exercise of powers conferred under Article 309 of the Constitution of India, the Construction Supervisors cannot be treated at par with the Civil Engineering Assistants. 2] Learned counsel Shri Deshmukh for respondent placed reliance on Government Resolution dated 11/3/2008. We find that the State had appointed a Committee to consider the equivalence. It was brought to the notice of the State that the course for training the persons as Civil Engineering Assistant was not taught in the State. After submission of the Expert Committee Report, the State had granted equivalence to the post of Construction Supervisor with the Civil Engineering Assistant. 3] The reasonings adopted by the Tribunal do not call for interference. We do not find any error in it. Petition is dismissed. (N.D.DESHPANDE) (NARESH H. PATIL) JUDGE JUDGE umg/wp113-10