1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 11468 of 2011-G Decided on: 27.12.2011 Tek Chand, S/o Sh. Daulat Ram, aged about 42 years, Resident of Village Jalana, P.O. Palog, Tehsil Arki, District Solan (HP), presently working as Driver in Civil Hospital Arki, under SDM Arki-cum-Chairman Sub unit Red Cross Society, Arki, Tehsil Arki, District Solan, H.P. ....Petitioner Versus 1. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, Distt. Red Cross Society, Solan, Office of Deputy Commissioner, Solan, H.P. 2. The Secretary H.P. State Red Cross Society Himachal Pradesh, Near Raj Bhawan, Shimla-171002. 3. The Assistant Commissioner to Deputy Commissioner, Solan, Tehsil and District Solan, H.P. 4. The Sub Divisional Magistrate Arki-cum-Chairman Sub Unit Red Cross Society Arki, Tehsil Arki, Distt. Solan, H.P. 5. The Chief Medical Officer, Solan, Tehsil & District Solan, H.P. ....Respondents Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, 2 Additional Advocate General for respondents No. 3 to 5. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayers: “ (I) Directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner as a Driver for regularization of his services or for grant of work charge status, keeping in view his 15 years long service rendered as a Driver with the respondent with further directions to grant all the consequential benefits flowing therefrom. (ii) The respondents be directed to pay equal salary at par with the Drivers working in Red Cross Society in neighbouring States i.e. State of Punjab and State of Haryana and further arrears etc. be ordered to be paid by the respondents to the petitioner with consequential benefits.” 2. It is submitted that the representation filed by the petitioner is pending before the first respondent. There will be a direction to the first respondent to consider the same and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment 3 alongwith a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the first respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, as above, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. December 27, 2011 (Justice Dev Darshan Sud), (ms/hl) Judge.