HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 496 OF 2011 ORDER : This Civil Revision Petition has been filed aggrieved by the docket order dated 27.12.2010 passed in I.A.No. 303 of 2010 in F.O.P.No. 490 of 2010 by the learned Judge Family Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Respondent herein is the petitioner in I.A.No. 303 of 2010. I.A was filed seeking leave of the Court to represent the respondent in main OP as a Power of Attorney Holder. The respondent is none other than the mother of the petitioner in main OP and also A2 in the offence under Section 498-A and Section 420 IPC in Crime No. 475 of 2009 on the file of the XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. That I.A was dismissed with the following observation: “Heard C/PS C/R Sworn statement of Padmavathi recorded in O.P. 490/2010 is filed against Laxmi Rama Krishna Mohan by Srilekha. The petition is not maintainable filed by Padmavathi is dismissed as Lakshmi Ramakrishna Mohan is in U.S.A.” Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the learned judge failed to appreciate that the counter in OP itself is not filed and case is not posted for conciliation. But I.A. No. 303 of 2010 was field, seeking permission to represent through natural mother and GPA holder and application to permit her to engage a counsel as she is not acquainted with legal procedure to file counter, therefore, dismissing the I.A No. 303 of 2010 and directing appearance of respondent is unsustainable in law. As seen from the record, the court below has not assigned any reasons while passing the impugned order and the order does not disclose anything except mentioning that the petition is not maintainable. In the circumstances, the order passed in I.A.No. 303 of 2010 is quashed and the matter is remitted to the trial court for fresh disposal. The trial Court is directed to dispose of I.A, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after assigning reasons and after giving an opportunity to both parties. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J DATE: 12.08.2011 KA