IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN THURSDAY, THE 5TH JULY 2007 / 14TH ASHADHA 1929 RP.No. 599 OF 2007(V) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.22232/2006 Dated 22/08/2006 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS ----------------------------------- 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, S.N.D.P.BUILDING,P.P.ROAD, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, SC, KFC RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------ 1. SHAJAN,S/O.MATHEW, POTHOOR HOUSE, THE PROPRIETOR, MOTHERS FOOD PRODUCTS, PERUMBALLOOR P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA. 2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R.) KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.DILIP MOHAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN J. = = = = = = = = = = R.P. 599/2007 IN WP(C) 22232/2006. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 5TH DAY OF JULY, 2007. O R D E R This is a petition seeking review of the judgment rendered on 22.8.2006 in W.P.(C) 22232/2006. The only ground urged is that the amount mentioned is Rs. 10 lakhs. It could be seen that as per Ext.P3, the Corporation demanded only an amount of Rs. 10 lakhs as on 24.5.2006. However, since the writ petition was filed only later, this was taken into consideration and that is how the amount of Rs. 12 lakhs was directed to be paid instead of ten lakhs. As such, there is no mistake in the calculation. Learned counsel, however, pleaded that the collection charges due to the Government has also to e added to this amount. Since the payment is to be made directly to the Corporation, the question of payment of any collection charges does not arise. The Review Petition is disposed of as above. P.R. RAMAN, (JUDGE) knc/- knc/-