IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2236 OF 2004 Prasant @ Titu Balkrishna Kalyarath ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents ...... None for Petitioner. Mr.A.S.Gadkari, A.P.P. for Respondents. ....... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MAY 2, 2005. MAY 2, 2005. MAY 2, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This Petition takes exception to the externment order passed as back as on 10th October 2003 by the competent Authority against the Petitioner. The externment period of one year has already been suffered by the Petitioner. 2. As the externment period has already expired, nothing survives for consideration in this Petition, in view of the exposition in the Judgment : 2 : of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz vs. Baby Naaz vs. Baby Naaz vs. Union of India reported in 1990 (Supp) SCC 163 Union of India reported in 1990 (Supp) SCC 163 Union of India reported in 1990 (Supp) SCC 163 (II) (II) (II). 3. Petition disposed of accordingly. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.