IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15162 of 2009 1. BISHWA RANJAN S/O LATE HARI SHANKAR PRASAD VILL.- DHEBAHAN, P.S.- KANTI, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM- SECRETARY null PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. ENGINEER IN CHIEF-CUM-SPECIAL SECRETARY PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING MECHANICAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR 5. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING MECHANICAL DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR with CWJC No.15208 of 2009 1. AWADHESH KUMAR S/O SRI BHUVNESHWAR RAI VILL- DAMODARPUR, DUMRI, P.S. KURHNI, DISTT. MUZAFFARPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM- SECRETARY PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. ENGINEER IN CHIEF-CUM-SPECIAL SECRETARY PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING MECHANICAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR 5. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING MECHANICAL DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR with CWJC No.15266 of 2009 1. PRADIP SAH S/O LATE JANAK SAH VILL- PHULWARIA, P.S. MANIARI, DISTT. MUZAFFARPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM- SECRETARY PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. ENGINEER IN CHIEF-CUM-SPECIAL SECRETARY PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. CHIEF ENGINEER null PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER null PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING MECHANICAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR 5. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING MECHANICAL DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR ----------- 2 2. 26.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The question involved being common in all these three writ applications, the Court for convenience will deal with the facts of C.W.J.C. No. 15162/09. The grievance relates to compulsion to open a C.P.F. account and in absence of which salary is being withheld from January, 2007. The submission is that the petitioner came to this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 767 of 2008 which came to be disposed with C.W.J.C. No. 6183 of 2008 and analogous cases. This Court held that the petitioner was not liable to open a C.P.F. account for reason discussed therein. L.P.A. No. 845 of 2009 preferred against the judgment has also been dismissed. While the benefit has been granted to the petitioners in C.W.J.C. No. 6183 of 2008, the same treatment was not being meted out to the petitioner despite the fact that both writ applications were disposed by a common order. This Court requires respondent no. 1 to examine the matter at his level as to why when this Court has pronounced on an issue and the Letters Patent Appeal has been dismissed only part compliance of the order is being done by extending the benefit to the petitioner of C.W.J.C. No. 6183 of 2008. This Court is satisfied that after the Letters Patent Appeal came to be dismissed, the petitioner was not 3 required to do anything further and the responsibility in the entirety lay with the respondents. Let the order of this Court after satisfaction be complied with by payment of all legitimate dues in accordance with law within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Respondent no. 1 shall also be obliged to hold an enquiry and fix responsibility as to the circumstances in which there has been part compliance with regard to the petitioners in C.W.J.C. No. 6183 of 2008 but the respondents have not thought it necessary to extend the same treatment to the petitioner when he has filed a representation to that effect also on 26.3.2009. This administrative enquiry is expected to be taken to logical conclusion of appropriate administrative action against the concerned also. The writ application stands allowed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)