: 1 : FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.43 OF 2008 WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.52 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s . orders or directions and . Registrar’s orders . -------------------------------------------------------------- Ms.Mrinalini Deshmukh with Mr.Mahesh Londhe i/b M/s.Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for the Petitioner. Ms.Z.S. Irani for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 16TH JUNE, 2008. P.C. : 1. I am not inclined to grant the application for transfer from Pune Court to Mumbai Court at this stage. 2. The only ground on which the application is made is that the Petitioner apprehends threats of physical and mental abuse and torture in the event of her attending the Court in Pune. : 2 : 3. It is pertinent to note however that there are no allegations of threat after the institution of not only the proceedings of which the transfer is sought, but after institution of the other proceedings which I shall now refer to. The Petitioner had filed a complaint under Section 498 of the Indian Penal Code for mental and physical harassment and for return of certain jewellery in the Pune Court. An application for anticipatory bail was made by the Respondent. The Petitioner attended all the hearings in that application which were in Pune. There is no application for transfer of those proceedings. 4. The bare allegations in paragraph 38 in Misc. Civil Application No.52 of 2008 that enquiries were made by a stranger as to the owner of the Petitioner’s car does not carry the matter further. 5. In the circumstances, the above : 3 : Misc. Civil Applications are dismissed. However, the Respondent shall pay to the Petitioner for each visit to Pune a sum of Rs.5000/-. In the event of the Petitioner requiring to stay overnight in Pune, liberty to the Petitioner to apply for enhancement. Liberty to apply. The dismissal of these applications will not prevent the Petitioner from making a fresh application, if necessary on any fresh evidence.