IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1008 of 2006 (M/S) Vinod Tiwari (minor) through his father (natural guardian) Sri Tara Dutt Tiwari, S/O Late Sri Gauri Dutt Tiwari, R/O Village Chaurasi, Post Bageshwar, District Bageshwar. ……. Petitioner. Versus State of Uttaranchal through Secretary, Agriculture Department, Uttaranchal Government, Dehradun and five others. … Respondents. Sri Manoj Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri K.P. Upadhyay, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State-respondent no.1 & 6. Sri Rajendra Dobhal, learned counsel for the University-respondent nos. 2 to 4. Date July 03, 2008. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Sri Manoj Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri K.P.Upadhyay, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents no. 1 to 6 and Sri Rajendra Dobhal, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 to 4-University. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- A. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to admit the petitioner in B.V.Sc. & A.H. course in the University on the basis of petitioner’s ranking in the Combined Entrance Examination. B. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 1 to hold high level enquiry in respect of the incident so that no innocent candidate is harassed and humiliated in future. C. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to compensate the petitioner for humiliation and sufferings undergone by the petitioner and his entire family. To issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. E. Award the cost of the writ petition in favour of the petitioner. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Short counter affidavit has been filed in the writ petition by the Assistant Government Advocate. The affidavit was duly sworn in by Sri T.S.Khati, the then Sub-Inspector, Police Station Pant Nagar, District Udham Singh Nagar. In paragraph no.4, the following statement has been made:- “4. That after completion of the Investigation in the aforesaid case; the deponent has prepared a charge-sheet dated 22-3-2007 and furnished the same to the Circle Officer, Rudrapur. A copy of the charge-sheet dated 22-3-2007 is being annexed herewith and marked as Annexure S.C.A.-1 to this affidavit.” In the course of arguments it has been stated at Bar by Sri Manoj Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner that the charge- sheet has already been submitted before the Court concerned and the criminal proceeding is to be concluded. Since the matter is urgent as the career of the student is involved, the Trial Court is directed to conclude the proceeding of the criminal case expeditiously as far as possible. Further, liberty is given to the petitioner that after the decision of the criminal case, the petitioner may file writ petition afresh if cause of action still survives. With the said direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma, J.) RCP