B} '€. SinotoBench IN THE HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl NO.t(S3^0F 2011 PETITIONER ^^ ^y <^9y .•• 'y RESPONDENTS Siyaram, S/o Bhukhanlal, aged about 52 years, Occupation Service, presently working at Public Works Department, Kota, Head Office Pendra Road, District Bilapsur (CG), resident of village Barni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (CG). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Public Works, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 2. , Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works Department Office, KatoraTalab, Raipur (CG). 3. Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (CG). 4. * Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (CG). 5. Executive .Engineer, Public Works Department, Pendra Division, Pendra Road, Bilaspur (CG). t' 6. Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Kota Sub Division, Head Office Pendra Road, Bilaspur (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SS1 HlGHCOyRIOFCHyAHl^GARH^^^ (Hon. Mr Justlce Manindra M< Shrivastaval W.P.(S)No.439Sof2011 Eetstsoner Siyaram. VERSUS Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others Present: Shri Maiay Shrivastava, counsel for the petitloner. Shri N. Naha Roy, PL forthe State. O^D_E_R (08.08.2011) The case of the petitioner is that vide order dated 23.08.2008 Annexure P-1, the petitioner was regularized as semi-skilled labourer in the pay scale of Rs.2610-3540. However, on the same day; another order was passed granting regular pay scaie to unskiiled labourers in the pay seaie of Rs.2550-3200 in which, the name of the petitioner was wrongiy included whereas the petltloner is semi-skilled tabourer and he was rightly granted regular pay scale of semi-skitled tabourer vide order Annexure P-1. The petitioner submitted his joining vide Annexure P-3 as semi-skitled labourer. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that though the petitioner has been granted regular pay scaie as semi-skilled labourer, that benetit is not being extended to him and tilt date, he is getting pay in the pay scaie of unskilled labourer. 3. !n reply to the notice given by the petitioner, the Executive Engineer informed that the direction of the order dated 23.08.2008 Annexure P-2 has already been proposed to the Superintending Engineer vide memo dated 02.09.2008. 4. Considering the submissions and that the petltioner ciaims to be semi-skilted tabourer and vide memo dated 02.09.2008, Priya cs^ amendment of order dated 23.08.2008 Annexure P-2 has been proposed, the Superintending Engineer should pass appropriate orders with regard to petitioner's status. If it is found that the petitioner was a semi-skilled tabourer regularized vide order dated 23.08.2008, the petitioner shalt be entitled to regular pay In the pay scale of Rs.2610-3540 from the date of the order. The decision shall be taken expeditiously. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge