IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 176 OF 2010 IN STAMP NUMBER (APPLN.) NO. 1777 OF 2010 SHRI. SHAIKH IQBAL MUZAWAR ... Applicant Versus MR. ABITALIB MALIK ... Respondent Ms. Andrea Fernandes, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri Ryan Menezes, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 14th September, 2010 P.C.:- Heard. By the present application, the Applicant/Complainant seeks condonation of delay of nine days in filing application for leave to appeal. The application is opposed by reply dated 7-9-2010. The Applicant's contention is that the delay occurred on account of a mistake in calculating the number of days. The days were calculated from the date of delivery of the certified copy instead of from the date of pronouncement of judgment. The Applicant's contention is opposed by stating that the Applicant/Complainant has not given any specifics as to who made the mistake and other details as to when the Applicant has contacted the advocate. It is further submitted that there is also delay after the delay was found out. Considering the period involved and the explanation offered in support of the same, in my opinion, this is a fit case to condone the delay in filing the application for leave to appeal. Accordingly, the application is granted. Application for leave to appeal be registered. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.