THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CRP No.3751/2011 Date of Order: 14-10-2011 Between: N. Smitha ..Petitioner and Nandamuri Suman ..Respondent The Court made the following Order: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CRP No.3751/2011 Oral order: The petitioner who is respondent in GW.O.P No.204/2004 filed the present revision petition under Art.227 of the Constitution of India to revise the orders of the learned Family Judge-cum-IV Additional District & Sessions Judge, Vijayawada dt. 18-8-2011 passed in IA No.445/2011, whereby petition filed by the respondent herein under Sec. 12 of the Guardian and Wards Act for interim custody of the minor children was dismissed granting visitation and access rights. The trial court while dismissing IA No.445/2011 ordered as under: “…..it is necessary that the petitioner should be allowed to have access on every Sundays from 10 AM to 5 PM and for 5 days during Dasara Vacation , 5 days during Christmas or Pongal vacation and for 15 days during Summer vacation. The custody of children be handed over to the petitioner on every Sunday at 10 AM and the petitioner shall hand over the custody of children to the respondent at 5 PM on the same day and the custody of children be handed over to the petitioner during vacations as stated above pending disposal of main OP. Since the minor children are studying primary education there will not hindrance to their education by the arrangement during vacation.” Learned counsel for the petitioner/mother contends that handing over of children to the respondent/father on every Sunday from 10 AM to 5 PM will cause lot of inconvenience to the children as they have to do home work on Sundays and therefore custody of the children to the respondent-father is not feasible, and the said order should be revived or modified to have only visitation rights at the house of the petitioner. This court cannot accede to the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner/mother for the simple reason that if the father is allowed to have access with the children from 10 AM to 5PM on every Sunday at her house, naturally they cannot do their home work during stay hours, but the children are with the petitioner/mother on all days except Sundays. Further, the learned counsel for the petitioner/mother admitted that from the date of the impugned order, the children were not given the custody to the father on all Sundays as directed. This shows the adamant attitude of the petitioner in not allowing the father to have access with the children in spite of orders passed by the trial court. The impugned order passed by the trial court does not suffer from any illegality warranting interference by this court. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _______________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J. Dt.14-10-2011 kmr