HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR DIWSION BENCH CORAM : HON’BLE SHRI H.L DATTU, CJ & HON’BLE SHRI V.K. SHRIVASTAVA, J. WRIT PETITICN NO. 1447 of 2002 None for the petitionerf Shri As‘ Kachhawahax Govt Advoeate for the State. ORAL ORDER . (Passed on 13‘“ Mamh, 2907) //, \§><— PETITIONER Ramkumar Patei, Pyare‘al PateL aged years, r10. Limtara, Poe?- Darrighat, Dist. Biiaspur, CG Verus RESPONDENTS 1) State of Chhattisgarh through the Semetary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Deveiopment, Mantrataya, D.K.S. Ratput 2) The Secretaly, Department of Schoat Mantrataya, D.K.S. Buitding, Raipur. 3) The Secretary, Department of Tribal Development, Mantrataya, D. K. S. Building, Raipur. 4) The Secretary, Department of Urban Developmerrt, Mantrataya, D.K.S. Buildt, Raipur. Director, Pubtic tnstructions, Chhattisgarh, Raipur 6) Commissioner, Tribai Devetopment, Chhattisgarh, Raipur. ?) Director, Directorate of Urban Development and‘ Administratéon, Raipur, CG. PRESENT: The following oral order of the Court was passed by H.L. Dat'tu, C.J. Petitioner has flied this PIL in the representative capacity. Primarily, he cans in question the vires of Panchayat Shaia Shiksha Samvida Shikshak (Niyukti Tatha Sewa Shanen), Niyam, 2001 2) ‘ Learned counsel appearing for the respondents informs us that the aforesaid rule is now replaced by a rule made in the year 2004. 3) ln View of the substitution of the rule, in our View, as on today, the relief sought for by the petitioner in this petition does not survive for conSideration. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner, if he so desires, to question the amended ruie, made in the year > 2004. Ordered accordingiy. 1. ’ .i . [#‘R dl— .l sar- ‘ clue: Jusu'ce i V.K. Shrlvastava Judge