IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16388 of 2011 Lokesh Kumar Singh, Son of Sri Hare Krishna Singh, resident of village 7 P.O. Diwan ke Barka Gaon, P.S. Sikraul, Block Itarhi, Buxar … Petitioner Versus 1. The Union Of India through Inspector General Bihar Sector, CRPF, Patna 2. The Inspector General, Bihar Sector, CRPF, Patna 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Kendra, CRPF, Jhaphan, Muzaffarpur 4. The Commandant, Recruitment Board, CRPF, Group Kendra Muzaffarpur 5. The Chief Medical Officer of CRPF, Composite Hospital Group Kendra, Muzaffarpur …Respondents For the petitioner :Mr. Satish Chandra Misrha & :Mr. Nurul Hoda For UOI :Mr. Shiv Kumar, CGC ----------- 02. 20.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Respondent-Union of India and its officials. Petitioner was an applicant for the post of Constable/GD (Male) in Central Reserve Police Force (for short CRPF’). It is the case of the petitioner that on clearing the physical eligibility test followed by written test, he was subjected to medical fitness test by a Board of doctors whereafter he was declared medically unfit as the doctors attending on him found the petitioner suffering from unequal pupil. Petitioner in the light of the liberty so granted by communication (Annexure-1) got himself medically examined by a doctor, namely, Dr. Harish Chandra Hare whereafter he was found medically fit and the finding of the Medical Board of the 2 CRPF was found an error of judgment. Armed with aforesaid certificate, he filed appeal for subjecting him to Review Medical Board. The respondents by a communication dated 02.06.2011 (Annexure-3), directed the petitioner to appear for Review Medical Board at Composite Hospital CRPF, Chandrayan Gutta, Keshewgiri Hydrabad. It is the case of the petitioner that he presented himself on the appointed day at the said hospital for subjecting him to Review Medical Board but he was not made to appear at the Review Medical Board. Aggrieved by the aforesaid action/inaction on the part of the respondents, he preferred a representation before the Respondent- Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre CRPF, Muzaffarpur (Annexure-5). It is contended that till today the said respondent has not considered and disposed of his representation in accordance with law Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner would be satisfied if the said respondent is directed to consider and dispose of his representation in accordance with law. Learned Central Government counsel in view of aforesaid stand taken by the petitioner, does not object to disposal of the present application in the aforesaid terms. According, this Court disposes of the application by the following order:- Let the petitioner file a detailed representation supported by documents, if any, as also a 3 copy of the present order within four weeks before the Respondent-DIG (respondentno.3). If any such representation is filed in the aforesaid manner, the said respondent shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law under intimation to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within five weeks of its filing. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )