^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HONtBLESHRIRAJEEVGUPTA,CJ. HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J .^ Appellants Cjaimants Respondents IVIisc Appeal (Cl No. 873 of 2009 1. Smt. Padmabai Rathiya w/o Haleshwar Prasad, ageci about 36 years. 2. Haleshwar Prasad Rathiya s/o Ishwar Prasad Rathiya aged about 38 years. Both resident of village and post Tundri, P.S. Dabhra, tahsil and district Janjgir Champa C.G. VERSUS 1 Kanhaiya Sarthi s/o Puran Sarthi, aged about 30 years, r/o village DhanaQar, P.S. Kotra, Road, district Raigarh C.G. (Driver ofthe vehicle) 2 Harishanker Patel s/o late Chamar Singh Patei, aged about 45 years, r/o vJJlage Kalmi, P.S. Kotra Road, district Raigarh C.G. (Registered owner of the vehicte) 3 ICICt Lombard General Insurance Company Limited, through Divlslonal Manager, Divisional Office I.C.l. BanR Towers, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai (IVIaharashtra). Through Branch Manager, JCIGI Lombard Insurance Company Umited, Branch Office Lal Ganga Shopping Mall Compjex Ralpur, tahsji and dtetrlct Raipur C.G. (insurance Company of the vehicie Tractor Trolley) Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 173 of IVIotor Vehicles Act ^^^^ MACNo. 973 of 2009 tmhT-NiiiNiiNn^^ Present : None for the appeilants. Shri Santosh Tiwari, counsei for respondent No.Z Shri Amrito Das, counsel for respondent No.3. ORDER (3rd November, 2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Qupta, C.J. None forthe appeltants. 2} As there is no representation on behalf ©fthe appeUants, we are left with no other option but to dismlss the appeal for want of proseGution. 3) The appeai, therefore, is dismtesed for want of pr<^ecuti©n. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge nimmi