IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 1377 of 2006. Date of decision: May 7, 2008. H.P. State Electricity Board ….. Petitioner. Vs. Rajeev Kumar & ors. …. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Baldev Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Navlesh Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Deepak Gupta,, Judge (Oral). This writ petition is directed against the order of the learned H.P. State Administrative Tribunal, dated 18th July, 2006 passed in O.A. No. 765 of 1993. 2. The applicant in his original application before the Tribunal had prayed that he may be paid daily wages as per the notifications issued by the State of Himachal Pradesh from time to time. He had also prayed for grant of interest on the said wages. He further prayed that the Board be directed to regularize his services as Junior Engineer (Graduate) from the date of his appointment. 3. The learned Tribunal on the basis of judgement of this Court as well as the judgement of the Apex Court held that the Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? …2… petitioner is entitled to the wages as notified by the State Government from time to time and directed that the difference in the wages paid to the applicant and the wages which were required to be paid to him at the enhanced rate as per the government notifications issued from time to time be paid within two months from the date of order. It was further ordered that in case the amount is not paid within the aforesaid period of two months, the petitioner would be entitled to interest at the rate of 9% on the amount of arrears. In respect of regularization, the learned Tribunal directed that the services of the original applicant be regularized in accordance with law by the Board in case his services had not already been regularized. 4. So far as regularization of the services of the petitioner is concerned, it has been submitted before us that in fact the services of the petitioner stand regularized with Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam (SJVN). The order of the learned Tribunal directing payment of difference in the wages actually paid to the petitioner and the wages which would be paid to him in terms of the notifications issued from time to time by the State cannot be faulted with. The order of learned Tribunal is strictly in accordance with law and calls for no interference. 5. In view of the above discussion, the writ petition is without merit and is rejected. No orders as to costs. ( Deepak Gupta ), Judge. May 7, 2008. ( Kuldip Singh ) (Hem) Judge.