IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH JULY 2010 / 6TH SRAVANA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 683 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.36904/2009 DATED 19/01/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): 14TH PETITIONER IN WP(C): -------------------------------------------------------------------- E.G.SOMAN, S/O.GOPALAN, AGED 54 YEARS, TECHNICAL OFFICER GRADE-III, CENTRE FOR WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT, KUNNAMANGALAM, KOZHIKODE-673 571. BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 IN WP(C): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SMT.NEELA GANGADHARAN, (FATHER'S NAME & AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DR.P.PRABHAKARAN, (FATHER'S NAME & AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), ADDL.CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SRI.T.K.MANOJ KUMAR, (FATHER'S NAME & AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY SPL.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. N.MANOJKUMAR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------- COC No.683 of 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th July, 2010 JUDGMENT The Government Pleader has made available a copy of G.O.(Rt)No.50/2010/S&TD dated 10.6.2010 which is issued by the third respondent according sanction to extend the revision of scale of pay sanctioned to the petitioners in O.P.No.27219/2000 to similarly placed technical staff also in the Centre for Water Resources Development & Management (CWRDM). Therefore, it is submitted that the direction contained in the judgment of this Court has been complied with. The counsel for the petitioner submits that though an order has been passed by the third respondent as submitted by the Government Pleader, the arrears of salary have not been paid. The petitioner may move the authorities for the disbursement of the salary due as per the sanction that has been accorded. Since the direction in the judgment of this Court has been complied with, this Contempt Case is closed. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE css/