- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.145 OF 2005 REVISION APPLICATION NO.145 OF 2005 REVISION APPLICATION NO.145 OF 2005 Manoj Gajanan Jadhav ...Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents. Ms M.H.Mhatre,A.P.P. for State Mr.Neel Helekar for Respondent No.2 CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : SEPTEMBER 27,2005 : SEPTEMBER 27,2005 : SEPTEMBER 27,2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. In order dated 20th September 2005, statement of the Advocate for the Applicant is recorded that he will supply a copy of the Revision Application to the Advocate for Respondent No.2. This Court adjourned the Revision Application for one week with specific direction that no further adjournment will be granted. 2. When the Revision Application is called out none appears for the Applicant. The learned Counsel for the Respondent No.2 states that the Advocate for the Applicant has not supplied copy of Revision Application to the Advocate on record appearing for the Respondent No.2. 3. In view of this statement and in view of the fact that none appears for the Applicant, I have no option but to dismiss the Revision Application for default. Dismissed for default. - 2 - JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE