THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32148 of 2010 Date: 22.12.2010 Between: B. Narayana and others ..... Petitioners AND The District Collector, Medak and others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri A.K. Mukheed Counsel for Respondent No.1: -- Counsel for Respondent No.2 and 4: Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies Counsel for Respondent No.3: Sri A. Ravinder Reddy, standing counsel for Corporations The Court made the following: ORDER: The short but serious grievance of the petitioners in this writ petition is that respondent No.3, to whom they have made representations on 26.10.2010 and 03.12.2010 to allow them to work as Hamalies in Mandal Level Stock Point (for short ‘MLS point’) at Papannapet is not taking a decision on those representations. It is the pleaded case of the petitioners that initially the MLS point was located at Kothapally and that recently the same has been shifted to Papannapet. That instead of treating the said MLS point as an existing point, respondent Nos.3 and 4 are seeking to discontinue the petitioners and engage new Hamalies by treating the MLS point as a new one. Against such an action, the petitioners are stated to have made representations on 26.10.2010 and 03.12.2010 to respondent Nos.3 and 4. Their grievance is that neither of the said two respondents has devoted their attention to their representations and redressed their grievance. The questions whether Papannapet MLS point is a new one or shifted from Kothapally and whether the petitioners are entitled to be engaged as Hamalies in Papannapet MLS point need to be decided by respondent Nos.3 and 4. As already noted above, the limited grievance of the petitioners is confined to non-disposal of the petitioners’ representations. Respondent Nos.3 and 4 are, therefore, directed to consider the petitioners’ representations dated 26.10.2010 and 03.12.2010, take a decision on continuation of the petitioners as Hamalies and communicate the same to the petitioners within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.40864 of 2010 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 22nd December, 2010 GHN