1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.15401 of 2011 1.A.SUNDARI 2.A.ANITHA 3.A.DHILIBAN RAJA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANTI LAND GRABBING SPECIAL CELL, VIRUDHUNAGAR , VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT IN CR.NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR. S.PALANIVELAYUTHAM for M/S. N.SUBRAMANI Advocate For Respondent : MR. C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 465, 468, 471, 406, 420 IPC and seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that only petition enquiry is pending against the petitioners on the basis of the complaint preferred by one Lakshmi, W/o Veerapthiran relating to property dispute. 3.However, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners were frequently called for interrogation by the respondent police and as such they are having apprehension of arrest. 4.It is seen that only petition enquiry is pending arrest against the petitioners on the basis of the complaint preferred by one Lakshmi, W/o Veerapathiran. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are having apprehension of arrest as they have been called for interrogation by the respondent police frequently, this Court is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 constrained to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar, on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the third petitioner shall appear before the es police every day at 5.30 p.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter he shall be available for interrogation as and when required and the first and second petitioners being ladies, they shall be avialable for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, VIRUDHUNAGAR 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR 3 INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANTI LAND GRABBING SPECIAL CELL, VIRUDHUNAGAR , VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT 4 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. N.SUBRAMANI Advocate SR.No.44422 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15401 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 TR : 21.12.2011: 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/