Criminal Misc. No.M-22168 of 2008 -1- *** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-22168 of 2008 Date of decision : 11.11.2008 Sunita .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Ajit Sihag, Advocate for the petitioner. **** S. D. ANAND, J. The petitioner is an estranged wife of respondent No. 2- Krishan Kumar. After their marriage had gone sour, she lodged a First Information Report against her estranged husband and other private respondents who are members of the parental family of her husband. In that matter, respondent no.2 filed a bail application (Annexure P-1). In the course thereof, he made an averment that petitioner (complainant) therein is a character less lady and element having bad antecedents used to visit in her house. On the basis of above averment, the petitioner filed a complaint under Section 500 IPC against her husband and other private respondents. Learned Trial Magistrate on perusal of the preliminary evidence ordered dismissal of complaint by noticing that relationship between the petitioner and private respondents was far from easy. That they were on litigating terms in number of cases and that the allegations against the petitioner were general in nature. Criminal Misc. No.M-22168 of 2008 -2- *** In revision too, the fate of the plea raised by the petitioner was not different. The petitioner is in quashment. The present is, obviously, a second revision petition filed by the petitioner that she has camouflaged it by describing as a petition for quashment under Section 482 Cr.P.C. There can be no dispute with the finding by the learned Trial Magistrate and learned Additional Sessions Judge that the allegations against the petitioner were too general in nature and there was no specific averment about her having any illicit liaison with any particular person. Even otherwise the allegations were made in the course of judicial proceedings and there is no finding by the Court that those are wrong in character. In the light of the fore-going discussion, the petition is held to be devoid of merit and is ordered to be dismissed. November 11, 2008 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE