.5-:,i il L; K rt-'ii 2 tn;3 t;;i%3's?.^^BI <R^^^I ^ Ni^-'^KH @BS^AB*-£ OL.s'ivri IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. /^-?^? /2006 PETITIONER ,»' 'y ^vl s%^ G. NEELACHALAM, S/0. LATE G. LAXMI NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, ASSISTANT TEACHER, PRAVAS ANDHRA PATSHALA, STEEL NAGAR CAhflP - I, BHILAI, DISTRICT-DURGfC.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, D.K.S. p fc BHAWAN, RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH) ^ ^?^ HEAD MASTER, Q.^ PRAVAS ANDHRA PATSHALA.STEEL NAGAR CAIVIP - I, BHILAI, DISTRICT - DURG (C.G.) / WRITPETITIONUNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner humbly begs to submit as under:- XI-HC-22 aii^TW R-ii<bsn$?T ipiKnnfsa «~^ ^' ^c;ET"yrai««,t)>Ti1'n*i<»,Riwi'(iy< 3TT^^CRra»_ f , WIOTBCTT^ """"""""""""""""""" ^200 ft^qq....................... sn^OTgRiTSR'yRcf 5-4-;MOS Shri Anoop Mazurndar, Shri Sushil Du6ey, Govt counsW ounsy fer the petitjoner. Adwtoate for the Stafe. Hearct. Learnecl counsel for the petitK Ashaskiya Shikshan Sansthan (Adh; Sandaya) Adhiniyam, 1978, the pe' Govemment grant is belng gjven to tl Govemment educational institutions. Court of Madhya Pradesh rendered ir }ner submite that under Rule 33(i) of Chhattisgarh ifapako Tatha Anya Kannachariyon Ke Vetano Ka (Itioner is entitled to get the beneflts where the Ijie scate corresponding c^egories of emptoyees in ILeamed oounsel referred to the decision ofHgh ir| the case of M.P. AshaahMya Matotfittyafeyeen Shefcsft^ahterKannacftaf Sang^ (W.P.Iio.2490/200Z) dtecfafed on 8-12-SOW. (ounsel appearing for the State, SMbmits thatthe i^ petitien without serving ndtice for demand of . On the other hand, leamed petltioner has straightaway ffled (hi| justice. in that view of the matter, prays that the petltioner may be competent authority ofthe responde( accordance with law. The prayer is not opposed by[ Having considered. and withj case, in the opinion of thisCourt, the petittoner to maKe a detailed competent authority oftherespondef within a period of one morrth, and authority ofthe pespondents shall de( law as eariy as possible preferably receipt ofthe representatlon. It-is petitioner may avail the remedy avait With theaforesaid observatiol' Certified eopy as per rutes. <Biqfn<i1i *iitnT^"fe'<SI '(lul+^l't ^3ft^H3II^»T enUs Shri Mazumdar, teamed counset forthe petitioner, pem|iitted to make a detailed representation before the ^ts, whichshall be considereci on its own mertts in the other side. )ut ®<pressingany opinion en the merits of the of justioe will be swved if a direction is given to ^epresentation raising his grietfanees before the its afong wtth a copy of the petltton and this order, such representation'belr^ ffled, theoomprtait side the same on its own merits in aasordancewith within a period of three rhonths from the date of clear that (f any grievance still remains, the ible underthe law inctuding filing of petition. — <)n nhade s, this petition stands disposed of. _lik- Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge