IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 16.12.2010 C.R.No.8193 of 2010 (O&M) Khila Ram ...Petitioner Versus Kesar Singh ...Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Rahul Rampal, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The judgment debtor is in revision aggrieved against an order passed by the learned Executing Court on 04.10.2008, whereby after deposit of balance sale consideration and filing of the proposed sale deed, a Local Commissioner was appointed for execution of the sale deed in favour of the decree holder. The appeal filed by the petitioner against the said order was dismissed. In fact, the order dated 04.10.2008 passed by the learned Executing Court is an interlocutary order against which no appeal is maintainable. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not satisfy, how an appeal before the first Appellate Court against the said order is maintainable. Since the decree has attained finality and the decree holder has deposited the balance sale consideration, the sale deed was required to be executed and for that process, appointment of Local commissioner cannot be said to be illegal in any manner. Consequently, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the learned Executing Court, which may warrant any interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Dismissed. 16.12.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE