IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2010 / 17TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 12253 of 2010(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SHYLAJA.D, W/O.PRASAD, AGED 42 YEARS, JUNIOR PUBLIC HEALTH NURSE, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, KOODALLOOR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. MINIKUTTY.A.G, JUNIOR PUBLIC HEALTH NURSE, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, POONJAR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. SOLLY JOSEPH, JUNIOR PUBLIC HEALTH NURSE, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, POONJAR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 4. MINIMOL.N.K, JUNIOR PUBLIC HEALTH NURSE, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, ARAKKUNNAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. PUSHPAVALLY.T.V., JUNIOR PUBLIC HEALTH NURSE, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, THIRUVANIYOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. BINCY PHILIP, JUNIOR PUBLIC HEALTH NURSE, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, THOTTOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER (HEALTH), KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER (HEALTH), ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ARAVIND KUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 12253 of 2010 F ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 7th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioners are presently working as Junior Public Health Nurse Grade-I in the Health Services Department. Feeling aggrieved by Ext.P2 draft transfer list, the petitioners have submitted Exts.P3 to P8 objections. The apprehension of the petitioners is that the respondents would finalise Ext.P2 without considering Exts.P3 to P8. A perusal of Ext.P2 would reveal that the respondents themselves invited for objections from aggrieved employees. Therefore, there cannot be any reason for such apprehension. However, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P3 to P8 before finalising Ext.P2, in case it is not already finalised. Sd/- (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge