IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL URISDICTION. ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL URISDICTION. ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL URISDICTION. T. SUIT No.21 of 1991. T.P. No. 50 of 1990 With Chamber Summons No.7 of 2008 Avantika P.Moraji ..Plaintiffs. Vs. Smt. Malika P. Moraji ..Defendants. Ms Mehernaaz Sam Wadia i/b Hariani & Co.Advocate for the Plaintiffs. Ms Sheetal S. Shah i/b Mehta & Girdharlal, Advocate for defendant No.1. Mr K. P. Jain, Advocate for defendant Nos. 2B and 2C (present in person) ALONGWITH SUIT No.1299 of 1985 Mrs Mallika P. Morarji and Anr. ..Plaintiffs. Vs. Madhukant M. Thakore and Ors. .. Defendants. Ms Mehernaaz Sam Wadia i/b Hariani & Co.Advocate for the Plaintiffs. Ms Sheetal S. Shah i/b Mehta & Girdharlal, Advocate for defendant No.1. Mr K. P. Jain, Advocate for defendant Nos. 2B and 2C (present in person) CORAM: V. C. DAGA, J. CORAM: V. C. DAGA, J. CORAM: V. C. DAGA, J. DATED: 11. 02. 2008. DATED: 11. 02. 2008. DATED: 11. 02. 2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Suit No. 1299 of 1985 is not on today’s board. By consent of parties taken on board. 2. Parties to the Testamentary suit have filed consent terms dated 11.2.2008. The same is duly signed by the plaintiff, defendant no.1 and heirs of the defendant No.2 i.e. 2(b) and 2(c). They are present in the Court. They are identified by their respective Advocates. Consent terms are also counter-signed by the Advocates appearing for the parties. Consent terms are accepted, taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 3. Both suits are disposed of in terms of consent terms. 4. Refund of court fees as per rules. 5. In view of disposal of main suit, Chamber Summons No. 7 of 2008 also stands disposed of. (V.C. DAGA,J) (V.C. DAGA,J) (V.C. DAGA,J)