1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.03.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD)No.3644 of 2011 R.Mariammal : Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, President of Ramanathapuram, Seva Samajam, Maniparaipatti Village, Virudhunagar. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Tahsildar, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District. : Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 28.01.2011 and change the patta in the name of the petitioner for S.No.245/2, Thulukkapatti Village, Virudhunagar District based on the judgment passed in O.S.No.107 of 2009 dated 07.12.2009 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Virudhunagar. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Perumal For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramanian Additional Government Pleader ORDER Mr.K.Balasubramanian, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition for a Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider her representation dated 28.01.2011 and change the patta in her name for S.No.245/2, Thulukkapatti Village, Virudhunagar District, based on the judgment passed in O.S.No.107 of 2009 dated 07.12.2009 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Virudhunagar. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. The case of the petitioner is that a suit in O.S.No.107 of 2009 was filed before the learned District Munsif, Virudhunagar, claiming right over the property, which is the subject matter in this Writ petition. The petitioner, being the person who has purchased the property, by virtue of a sale deed dated 31.12.2008, has filed the said suit. However, the patta was wrongly entered in the revenue records. The first respondent when interfered with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property, the said suit was filed by the father-in-law of the petitioner on behalf of her. The suit has been decreed in favour of the petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner approached the respondents for change of patta in her name, which has not been considered by them so far. Therefore, the petitioner sent a representation dated 28.01.2011. Even then, the request of the petitioner was not acceded to. Hence, the petitioner is driven to file the present Writ Petition. 4. Considering the limited scope of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the claim made by the petitioner, I direct the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 28.01.2011 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The Writ Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(LA) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, President of Ramanathapuram, Seva Samajam, Maniparaipatti Village, Virudhunagar. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Tahsildar, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District. +1cc to Mr.V.Perumal, Advocate, Sr.No.8441 +1cc to the Special Govt.Pleader, Sr.No. 12134 sml ssk/09.04.2011 /6c -2p/- Order made in W.P.(MD)No.3644 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/