IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI TUESDAY, THE 8TH JUNE 2010 / 18TH JYAISTHA 1932 RP.No. 459 of 2010() ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN CRP.3256/2001 DATED 17/12/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT: ---------------------------------------------------------- THE SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB RESPONDENT: --------------------- PUNNAKKAL RAGHAVAN, S/O. RAMUNNI, AGED 60 YEARS, PUNNAKKAL HOUSE, KANHIRODE AMSOM, THATTIODE DESOM, KOODALI. BY ADV. SRI. GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.Q.BARKATH ALI, J. ------------------------------ R.P.No.459 of 2010 IN CRP.No.3256 OF 2001 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of June, 2010 O R D E R Heard. I find no ground to review the Order dated December 17, 2009. Hence, review petition is dismissed. The standing counsel of KSEB submitted that in paragraph 4 of the Order it is stated that “Counsel for the KSEB submitted that they have no objection in granting interest at the rate claimed by the revision petitioner”, that he has not made such a submission and that therefore the said sentence may be deleted. The counsel for revision petitioner has no objection for the same. Therefore, In paragraph 4 of the Order the sentence “Counsel for the KSEB submitted that they have no objection in granting interest at the rate claimed by the revision petitioner.” is hereby deleted. Issue corrected copy of the Order. P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE. mns