HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sinqle Bench : Hon’ble Shri Diiip Rao‘saheb Deshmukh, J. Miscellaneous Abnea! (CJ No.1 53/2006 1. Rekhani Bai, Wd/o Teku Ram Dhruv, Aged about 30 years. Ku. Chuneshwari Bai, D/o Teku Ram Dhruv, aged about 9 years. Ku. Tanuja Bai, D/o Teku Ram Dhruv, aged about 7 years. Ku. Jeetu D/o Teku Ram Dhruv,‘ aged about 3 years. Devraj Dhruv Sfo Teku Ram Dhruv, Appeilants No.2, 3, 4 & 5 are represented by legal guardian’mother Rakhani Bai, Resident of Village Jhiria, P. O. Kamata, District Raipur (C.G.) Versus Abbas Khan S/o Jabba Khan, Musalman Resident of Taj Chowk Telibandh, Ralpur, District Raipur: Present Address By Divisional Officer, Water Management Sub Division No.4 Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Divisional Officer, Water Management Sub Division No.4 Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Engineer, Irrigation Department, Raipur,. C.G. Government, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) v 4. Collector. Raipur, District r Raipur (C.G.) Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1994. npellants iaimants U’lhQM- Respondents 1 . Non-applicants Present: Shri S. C. Verma, counsel for the appellants. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 4‘“ day of Jury, 2008) Heard on admission. (2) ln this appeal fo enhancement of compensation of Rs.3.21,432/- awarded by the 4‘“ Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Raipur @ A C r @U} (henceforth “the Tribunal") in Claim Case No.44/2005 relating to accidental death of one Teku Ram Dhruv! the only point urged by learned counsel for the appellants is that the Tribunal ought to have considered the income earned by the deceased by taking tuitions as narrated by widow of the deceased before the Tribunal. in this regard, para-16 & 17 of the award passed by the Tribunal is perused. The Tribunal has given cogent reasons for not taking into consideration the statement \of the widow of the deceased relating to additional income from tuitions. In my considered opinion, the award passed by the Tribunal is a weil reasoned speaking award and no ground for enhancement of compensation awarded by the Tribunal is made out. (4) The appeal being sans merit is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. Sd—/ i i Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh 1 Judge Tumane