IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No5§596f 2009- PETITIONER : [W’Rudra Narayan Sinha, Age 45 years S/ o Shri RP. Sinha, Occupation — Upper Division Teacher in Government Middle School Krishana Nagar, District— Durg (CIGJ R/ o Smriti Nagar,Bhilai DistDurg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1/ State of Chhattisgarh Through the Principal Secretary Department of Education, D.K.S.Bhawan,Mantralaya, Raipur(C.G.) . rThe District Education Oifiicer, District —Durg (C.G.) 3. ’ The Block Education Officer, District— Durg (C.G.) x/ ./ ' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE ONSTITUTION OF INDIA 9/ 5\\ ,» HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5262 of 2009 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF mDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Jitendra Nath Nande, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 14 day of September, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage and prays that the respondent authorities may be directed to consider and decide his representation dated 13m July, 2009 (Annexure P/5) pending before the respondent No. 2, as early as possible. 2. Ms. Jain learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondents submits ‘that the representation of the petitioner, as aforestated, shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of f, two weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy ofthis order. 3. In View of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. i j Sd/- ’ - ' fSatish K.Agnihotri;. , . ; Judge Amit PETITIONER Rudra Narayan Sinha. VERSUS RESPONDENTS State ofChhattisgarh & Others.