IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10152 of 2011 MURARI PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 19.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 364, 365/34 of the I.P.C. The accusation is of taking away the grand son of the informant for extortion purposes. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that for the alleged occurrence of 11.08.2001 the complaint was filed on 21.08.2001 which got registered as police case on 24.08.2001. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that during investigation the accusation was found false and final form was submitted but differing with the same, cognizance has been taken in the matter. It is further submitted that the informant subsequently retracted form his initial version and has filed a petition to that effect before learned Court below. It is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that in 164 Cr.P.C. statement the victim has supported the accusation and there are evidences in the case diary. 2 Considering the fact that considering the 164 Cr.P.C. statement of the victim and other evidence the police submitted final form treating the accusation false, let the petitioner namely Murari Pandey, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Naugachia in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 137 of 2001(G.R. No. 425 of 2001). Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)