IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3597 of 2009 SUBHASH KUMAR, SON OF NAGENDRA PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – BHAGWATPUR, P.S. AND DISTRICT – VAISHALI. ……….. PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. SRI NASIM AHMAD, DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR. 3. SRI KUNDAN KUMAR, BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, VAISHALI BLOCK, DISTRICT – VAISHALI. 4. SRI RAMESH CHANDRA, BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, VAISHALI BLOCK, DISTRICT – VAISHALI. 5. SRI RAGHUNATH SHARMA, PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ BHAGWATPUR, BLOCK- VAISHALI, DISTRICT – VAISHALI. 6. SMT. SUMAN DEVI, MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BHAGWATPUR, BLOCK – VAISHALI, DISTRICT – VAISHALI. ………….. RESPONDENTS/OPPOSITE PARTIES. With MJC No.3598 of 2009 RAJENDRA CHOUDHARY, SON OF LATE TUFANI BAITHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – CHAKRAMDAS, P.S. AND DISTRICT – VAISHALI. ……… PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. SRI NASIM AHMAD, DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR. 3. SRI KUNDAN KUMAR, BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, VAISHALI BLOCK, DISTRICT – VAISHALI. 4. SRI RAMESH CHANDRA, BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, VAISHALI BLOCK, DISTRICT – VAISHALI. 5. SRI RAGHUNATH SHARMA, PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ BHAGWATPUR, BLOCK- VAISHALI, DISTRICT – VAISHALI. 6. SMT. SUMAN DEVI, MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BHAGWATPUR, BLOCK – VAISHALI, DISTRICT – VAISHALI. ………….. RESPONDENTS/OPPOSITE PARTIES. . With MJC No.3599 of 2009 AMARNATH SINGH, SON OF SRI ARJUN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – BHAGWATPUR, P.S. AND DISTRICT – VAISHALI. ……. PETITIONER. Versus 2 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. SRI NASIM AHMAD, DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR. 3. SRI KUNDAN KUMAR, BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, VAISHALI BLOCK, DISTRICT – VAISHALI. 4. SRI RAMESH CHANDRA, BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, VAISHALI BLOCK, DISTRICT – VAISHALI. 5. SRI RAGHUNATH SHARMA, PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ BHAGWATPUR, BLOCK- VAISHALI, DISTRICT – VAISHALI. 6. SMT. SUMAN DEVI, MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BHAGWATPUR, BLOCK – VAISHALI, DISTRICT – VAISHALI. ………….. RESPONDENTS/OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 04/ 06.07.2011 No one appears for the petitioners. Show cause has been filed on behalf of O.P. No. 2 in MJC No. 3598 of 2009 (Rajendra Choudhary Vs. The State of Bihar & others), District Superintendent of Education, Vaishali at Hajipur, in which it has been stated that Block Education Extension Officer, Vaishali was asked to sumit his report whether persons, whose names were not mentioned in letter No. 539 dated 30.9.2009, were working at their respective schools. The report submitted by Block Education Extension Officer indicates that five persons are working and salary has been paid. The report of Block Education Extension Officer, Vaishali has been annexed as Annexure-B. In 3 this report name of Amarnath Singh petitioner in MJC No. 3599 of 2009, Subhash Kumar petitioner in MJC No. 3597 of 2009 and Rajendra Choudhary petitioner in MJC No. 3598 of 2009 has been mentioned. On the basis of this show cause, it transpires that direction of this Court has duly been complied. All these contempt applications are disposed of. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J. )