12.5.2008. Present: Mr.Tarlok Chauhan, counsel for the appellant. Mr.G.D.Verma, Sr.Advocate with Mr.B.C.Verma, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr.Vinod Gupta, Advocate for respondents No.6 to 11 and 13. RSA.No.137/2007. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that appellant-Satinder is no longer in possession of the suit premises. According to him proforma respondents No. 4 to 15 are the owners who had actually let out the premises to Satinder on 4th February, 2002 and when appellant-Satinder handed over the possession back to them the premises were again let out to a new person. In this view of the matter, the present appeal has become infructuous and dismissed as such. CMP.No.228/2007. In view of the dismissal of the main appeal, this application is also dismissed. (Sanjay Karol),J. May 12, 2008(R)