CR No. 3111 of 1990 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CR No. 3111 of 1990 Date of decision March 17, 2009 Ram Sarup ....... Petitioner Versus Fateh Chand and another ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondents. **** K. Kannan, J. 1. The tenant who faces the orders of eviction passed by the Rent Controller and affirmed by the Appellate Authority is the revision petitioner before this Court. 2. The petition had been filed under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 seeking for ejectment on the ground of non-payment of rent and on the ground of personal necessity of the landlord. During the pendency of the petition, the landlord had sought for an amendment of the petition seeking to incorporate Section 13-A of the Act on the premise that he was a 'specified landlord' and that was entitled to obtain summary ejectment. This had been previously opposed by the tenant and by orders passed in a revision. This Court had directed the deletion of the claim by the landlord as 'specified landlord' and seeking for ejectment on such a ground. Ultimately, the case came to be therefore, decided only under Section 13. The Rent Controller had found that the personal necessity as made out by the landlord was well CR No. 3111 of 1990 2 established and the Appellate Court also found the requirement to be genuine. The Appellate Authority had adverted to the admission of the tenant that the younger son of the landlord was ever harassing the landlord under the influence of liquor and there was a genuine need for the landlord to obtain eviction. The tenant's contention that the landlord's intention was to sell the property after getting it vacated was found to be without any basis. On such a reasoning the Appellate Authority also confirmed the order of the Rent Controller. No tenable arguments are made to the contention to assail the findings of the authorities below. 3. The Civil revision petition is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 17, 2009 archana