IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17192 of 2010 SANJEET KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 23.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is not a manufacturer rather selling the seized sattu in name of the Company i.e. Pragati Chana Sattu which is not observed injurious to health by Combined Food and Drug Laboratory, Agamkuan, Patna. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with G.O. 35 of 2010, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Madhubani subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)