IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- Crl. Misc. No. M- 1479 of 2008 Date of Decision:- 6.3.2009 Sagun Garg & Anr. Versus State of Punjab & Anr. Present:- Mr. Sunil Chadha, Advocate, and Ms.Poonam Tara, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. R.S.Rawat, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. M.M.S.BEDI. (J) (Oral) This petitioner has been filed for quashing of FIR on the ground that the matter has been compromised. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 put in appearance and stated that the steps were originally taken to compromise the matter, but in view of the petitioners having not fullfiled the term and conditions of the compromise, the compromise could not be finalised. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that as a matter of fact money has arleady been received pursuant to the compromise entered into between the parties. As the matter was of civil nature but the complainant with an oblique motive in order to harass petitioners are resiling from the terms of the compromise. Without entering into controversy regarding the petitioners having performed their part pursuant to the terms of the compromise, it is sufficient to observe that it will be open to the petitioners to reclaim any money/property handed over to the complainant pursuant to the disputed compromise Annexure P/2. Dismissal of this petition will not debar the rights of the petitioners to seek acquittal by establishing unfair conduct of the complainant at opportunant time before the trial Court. March 6, 2009 (M.M.S.Bedi) tripti Judge