sat 1 wp 969-2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 969 OF 2011 Damodar Govind Jadhav ...Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.D.W. Bhosale for the Petitioner. Ms.M.H. Mhatre, APP for the State. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & U.D. SALVI, JJ. JULY 20, 2011 P.C. :- 1 We have heard Mr.Bhosale, the learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2 CR No.269/2010 has been registered on the basis of complaint submitted by the petitioner to the Mangalwedha Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 504 read with 34 of IPC. sat 2 wp 969-2011 3 Ms.Mhatre, the learned APP has placed before us the investigation papers and it is revealed that on 10th February, 2011, the petitioner’s daughter Rohini made a statement before the police which was reduced in writing. In the said statement, she purportedly stated that on her own free will, she left her father’s house on 22nd December, 2010 and joined Somnath Gaikwad at Mangalwedha bus stand, both of them travelled to Solapur, Pune and Hyderabad. On 4th January, 2011, they got married at Hyderabad. 4 We are informed by Mr.Bhosale that the petitioner’s daughter Rohini has now separated from her husband and divorce proceedings have already been filed before the competent court. 5 So far as the investigation in CR No.269/2010 is concerned, we do not find any case made out to transfer the same to any other police station or agency. We direct that the investigation in CR No. 269/2010 shall be completed, as expeditiously as sat 3 wp 969-2011 possible, and final report shall be submitted to the concerned court by 30th September, 2011. 6 The petition is disposed in terms of the above directions. (U.D. SALVI, J) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J)