IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16919 of 2011 Fakir Mandal son of late Jamuna Mandal, resident of village Adampur, P.S. Adampur, District Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Urban Development Deptt., Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Municipal Commissioner, Bhagalpur Municipal Corporation, Bhagalpur. 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Bhagalpur, Bhagalpur Municipal Corporation, Bhagalpur. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 3. 28.9.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Vikas Kumar Pankaj, learned A.C. to G.P.3, who appears on behalf of respondent no.1 and Smt. Pravina Kumari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3/Bhagalpur Municipal Corporation. The petitioner, who retired as Class-IV employee in the year 1994 from Bhagalpur Municipality, has prayed for directing the respondents to pay his retiral dues under different heads to lthe tune of Rs.1,84,170/-, pay arrears of gratuity as per Government resolution dated 5.5.1998 and further to revise pension as per 5th Pay Revision with effect from 1.1.1996. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be 2 disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent no.2 by filing representation. The submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner has not been disputed by Smt. Pravina Kumari, learned counsel for Municipal Corporation. In view of stand taken by the parties, there is no need to further keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 in respect of claim made in the present writ petition within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, the court expects that respondent no.2 will examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no.2 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.2 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the 3 same to the petitioner within four months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)