IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. WP No.1253 of 2009 Decided on :30.11.2009 Islam ... Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Deepak Girotra, AAG, Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel states that the dispute has been resolved and all the alleged labourers have left the premises on their own wishes. He further states that all the persons alleged to be detenues had suffered a statement before the District Food & Supply Controller and Director, Labour Commissioner to this fact. I notice that on the last two hearings, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners, a fact which tends to corroborate the assertion made by the AAG, Haryana. Consequently, this petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to revive it if the statement made above is not correct. November 30, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE