1N pE'rmmNE-R ’ EQd‘m/h ~ \ i i , ‘ 5 A , 5 ‘ r HIGH COUM‘ w MADEIYA ww§£§ gyl‘j’ggB; Jig __________ .. _. w. - _. ... \ 7 6 L \ ‘ ; :' ‘ cFouao11u3oa 3 P.......u1994 g? / ’1 a LAL BRmENmA and-3H ' ‘ aged about 62 years. ‘ ‘ é $/o Lal Rem Singh. R/o Bhagat 3mgh Wara Kachhari RO ad, Dcngargarh, DisttuRajnanégaon {Maw . .;.. V Enn‘lfs513 U S ... ‘ m I .. > 3 & 1v Boani I 0f ‘Revellue ‘ ‘ Madhya Pradesh I?ibt:imahal, Gwalisr (Pia?) / (‘ 2-» District ConQpera‘cive Central Bark,Lt€:., Burg (WP). :/\ 3— Distriét Ca~6p&rati11é Central H Bank Ltd. Rajnandgaan (1mm; ’ Q 44... De‘puty Director, C0-0pe$aiive ' ‘ Evocieties, Bunkar Sangh, ' _ C k Statisn~%a<~l. Burg (M-P) . 1 J" V1 5- J0int~3§2iww,3egistrar, ‘ i v Cmaperativg Societies, “1 Raipurn-Division' EKxg Raipur U~1.P} afigxgigrrw§9§R..&&T£C£Eé gzg/m. gang Qvgssgimlwyg wgwgwaigam £22 ‘ 1 wvaao: gEaTgsw'I..WQA_x - aRQHygmya 2 gig .Jw“kgkzagRg’iggagPgwgRgAgj);@cgigmg . ._ .1 “Being aggrieveé by orc'ier ciateé 16.3a1§93 passec‘x in Appea No.5o_E-iva/91 re1atJmg to; Lal‘Brijenaral g 5331‘?“ V/5h Central, Co—ogerative Bank LtdJBurg arrc‘i others by Eion'ble Mnmember ‘Robert Hvéra—lg'dola‘ ‘ J ccnté...2'. i I ’ ; * w HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 762 of 1994 PETITIONER : Lal Brijendra Singh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Board ofRevenue & Others. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: None for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy G.A. for the State. Shri Rakesh Thakur, Advocate for the respondent No. 3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 09m day of February, 2010) 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In View of the above. the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner, forthwith. sArisn K. AGNIHOTRI Judge Sd/- Amit