(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 267 OF 2005 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 267 OF 2005 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 267 OF 2005 Mrs. Annie Nitin Barfe ...Appellant Versus Nitin Rajnikant Barfe ...Respondent ..... Shri. S.D. Patil, counsel for the Appellant Shri. Ajit Kawande, counsel for Respondent. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 22ND DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 22ND DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 22ND DECEMBER, 2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and Respondent. 2. We have perused the report of the mediator, which is at page 44 of the Appeal paper-book. After some discussions, both the parties, by consent, have agreed to the following: a. Both Appellant and Respondent are agreeable for a decree of divorce by mutual consent under the Indian Divorce Act. Accordingly, the marriage between the Appellant and the Respondent dated 30.5.2001 shall stand dissolved on payment of the entire (-2-) maintenance amount of Rs.1,75,000/-. b. The Respondent-husband shall pay a sum of Rs.1,75,000/- by way of lump-sum amount towards all claims of maintenance of the Appellant-wife. Out of the said sum, the Respondent shall pay Rs.1,00,000/- to the Appellant-wife within a period of four weeks from today and the balance amount of Rs.75,000/- to be paid within a period of eight weeks thereafter. c. Upon receipt of entire sum of Rs.1,75,000/-, the Appellant-wife shall withdraw all Criminal Complaints filed against the Respondent-husband before the appropriate Criminal Courts. So also both the Appellant and Respondent withdraw all allegations made against each other unconditionally. 3. Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the above. 4. Issuance of certified copy expedited. ***** (-3-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 311 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 311 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 311 OF 2005 IN IN IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 267 OF 2005 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 267 OF 2005 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 267 OF 2005 Mrs. Annie Nitin Barfe ...Applicant Versus Nitin Rajnikant Barfe ...Respondent ..... Shri. S.D. Patil, counsel for the Applicant Shri. Ajit Kawande, counsel for Respondent. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 22ND DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 22ND DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 22ND DECEMBER, 2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- . In view of disposal of Appeal, this Civil Application does not survive and the same is disposed of as infructuous. *****