IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. ASHOK KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 5925 of 2008 Between: 1 Ronda Narapa Reddy S/o.Subba Reddy R/o.Flat No.106, R.Narapa Reddy Towers Motilal Nagar, Begumpet, Secunderabad 2 Ronda Balaram Reddy S/o.Suryanarayana Reddy R/o.Pandillapalli village Vetapalam Mandal Prakasam District 3 V.Chandra Kishore S/o.Late Shri V.C.Kesava Rao R/o.Ongole, Prakasam District 4 P.Subba Reddy S/o.Sesha Pannagasai Reddy R/o.Chirala , Prakasam District 5 N.Dayasagar Reddy S/o.Late Shri Seetha REddy r/o.D.No.37-1-426, 1st Lane Ramnagar, Ongole, Prakasam District ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of Andhra pradesh, rep.by its Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad 2 The REvenue Divisional officer, Secunderabad Division Ministers Road, Secunderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to isue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the inaction on the part of the Second respondent in not acting upon and implementing the orders of the Special court under Land Grabbing (Prohibition ) Act, 1982 Hyderabad in LGC.No.34/90 dated 5.3.1993 as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the provisions of Rule 15 of Land Grabing (Prohibition ) Rules, 1988 and issue consequential direction to the respondent to implement the order in LGC.No.34/1990 dated 5.3.1993 forthwith Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. ASHOK KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO :5925 of 2008 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedies as are open to them under law. He has also made an endorsement to that effect on the bundle. Permission is accorded and the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ___________________ T. MEENA KUMARI,J DATE: 26th March, 2008 ___________________ S. ASHOK KUMAR, ,J Note: Office shall return the original papers to the counsel for the petitioner. B/o pnb To 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad 2 The Revenue Divisional officer, Secunderabad Division Ministers Road, Secunderabad 3 Two C.Cs. to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. 4. Two C.D. copies