1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 34. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 120/2010 (SURESH PANDITRAO KADAM AND ORS V/S RAJABHAU DAMODHAR UBALE AND ORS) With CA/12590/2010 In AO/120/2010 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. B.R.Kedar, Adv., for the appellant. Mr. M.D.Shinde, Adv., for respondent nos. 1 to 10. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:23/11/2010 1. Heard. In Special Civil Suit No.136/2009, the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalna, by his order dt. 21.7.2007, clamped injunction against the appellants and same is questioned. The record illustrates, the petitioners are paramount title holders in relation to the suit property. The revenue entries of the plaintiffs (respondents) for three years, are deleted by following procedure prescribed under the Statute. The reliance 2 placed by the plaintiffs on the agreement Dt.1.2.1989, has been found by the learned Judge to be defective. In this scenario of the matter, considering the revenue entries showing name of the petitioners as purchasers to be in possession of the property, there was no occasion for the learned Judge to have held that the plaintiffs were in possession of the property and that too there being no such title document to support contentions of the plaintiffs ( respondents). The order under challenge warrants interference. It is accordingly set aside. Injunction vacated. Appeal allowed. Civil Application disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/120-10ao