(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 105 OF 1990 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 105 OF 1990 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 105 OF 1990 Bhau Jyoti Charapale & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Vishwas Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. and others ...Respondents ..... Mr. R.G. Ketkar, counsel for Petitioner Mr. V.B. Raajure, counsel for Respondent No.6. Mr. A.H. Palekar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.2 to 5. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 21ST FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 21ST FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 21ST FEBRUARY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- . Mr. Ketkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly concedes that with the passage of time nothing further survives in this contempt petition. Hence, the contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous. Rule discharged.