^5^·^ •^l^t^, ?$Tfi^41<S, {®1<?1>W^< NIN^I sh^Jch """"""""""""""""""""""""""""^ 200 W^ ^(^K (^S^^) J^T f^iw sbHI<=b <.-..,. '?'^fR;R ^n ^iiiST M.A. Nd 604/2007 .4PPELLANT Non-appiicant No. 1 RESPONDENTS Applicant United Local In<|ia Ad{lre.s.$ ^tt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Irsus 1 Anchal | Singh Sutyavanshi, S/o. Mansingh Suryavalishi, aged- 10 years, Minor- t.hrough- natural feuardian- father, Man Singh Suryavanshi, aged 35[years, R/o. Keshla^ At present- Bohardih, O.P.- Pat;hpedi. P.S.- Mastyri, Distt: Bilaspur (C.G.) Non-applicant No. 1. Omprak^sh Ratre, S/o. Shri Narayan Ratre, aged 19 II-/0. Kesla, P..S. Pamgarh, Distt. Janjgir i|(C.G.) years, ^ Champa| Non-applicant No, 2, 3. Chotelai| Village Janjgir SB: HON'BLE SHRI DHIREINDRA MI^ Shri Dasi-ath Gupta, Advocate for None appears for respondents. (14-^ Dhirendra Mishra, J. Heard on admission. The instant appeal is dir^cted dated 2lld March, 2007 passed Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur in Cla|mi of Rs. 25,000/- has been award^< compensation for the injuries su| GM<<f<n<i1i ^H^'^ft1^ <F»1^1< '^'3tRrH3?n^?T Insurance Co. Ltd. T.P. Nagar- Korba, ?.s.$- B-ajendra Nagar Chowk, Bilaspur Sahu, S/o. Slm Ganga Ram Sahu, R//o. |and P.0. Nariyara, P.S. - PaTngarh, Distt. (phaiTipa(C.G.) .HRA, J., the appellant, OltDER -200T) against the impugned award by the Additional Motor Accident Case No. 6/2006 whereby a sum ;d to the respoi-ident No. 1 towards ^tained by him in a motor accident GRPRJ— FS/246—2/2007 —50,000., |||iTr-tr.i"-rf l.r^-s--^-?: ^ ~3:VS! -q|-q|<?-><q, ^Tll'M'l^, ^0|^<^< HWv{[ *N|cb•-"••"""•".^ 200 3TI^?T ^WF (<i^l€<<^) ^sr^r R^?cb WT ^3^ Sb^loh B ^ ^nw^n^ii^r dated 28-10-2005 involving the 2255 owned by the respondent noj The Tribunal in para 1U of| drwer bf the vehicle does not the insurarice company is respon$ it can recover the same from JU^^J . /^ ©pportWii^vzhas been given to t4 from the owner and driver after claimant. Considering the above fac^ there is no illegality or infirmi^y requires interference by this Courf Accordingly, the appeal is dfLsmiissed at admission stage. <=»5i<il<n<i)i^RTR^f ^' "fe^ <P?1^1< '^'sfRRSTT^t ^ehicle -Motorcycle No. CG11/ZE- 3 and driven by respondent no. 2. Ithe award has held that where the pos^ess the driving licence, even then, ^ible for payment of award, however clwner and driver and accordingly, appellant to recover the amount ^aying the awarded amount to the this Court is of the opinion that in the impugned award whicK Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge \