IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.134 of 2008 Ram Kumar Yadav & Ors . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors . ----------- Counsel for the appellants : Mr. Y.V. Giri, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate Counsel for the State of Bihar : Mr. Awanish Nandan Sinha, G.P.-II Mr. Shubhankar Sharma, A.C. to G.P.-II ----------- 14. 17.11.2011 This Letters Patent Appeal arises out of the order dated 26.11.2007 passed by the learned single Judge in C.W.J.C. No.7487 of 2007 wherein the official respondents have cancelled the process of counseling that took place in the year 2007 ( Annexures-(4 and 5). However, learned single Judge did not interfere in the writ petition and hence this appeal. A Division Bench of this Court has passed an order on the merit of the case and has categorically said that the appellants are entitled to receive their salary for the period they have worked. The main contention advanced by the learned senior counsel for the appellants before this court is with reference to non-issuance of show cause before passing the order. Materials were placed by the unofficial respondents to show that show cause has been issued prior to passing of the proceeding for cancelling of counseling. Accordingly, we are of the opinion that such action would not be of the nature of violating the principles of natural justice and it would suffice if a direction is issued to the B.D.O, Andar Block, Siwan, to issue show cause and consider the explanation of the appellants. We are also of the opinion that the interim order passed on 27.7.2009 2 could be made final and with this observation this L.P.A. stands disposed of and the order of the learned single Judged is modified. However, the appellants are at liberty to raise all the objections raised in this appeal in their explanation. Sudip ( T. Meena Kumari, J.) ( Vikash Jain, J. )