L 7/^>^^ ^" I_N_THE HlGH CQSJRT_ OF_.JU^CATURE_ ^E^'^B^WK. (^,%N\NS vBlT FETrTTCN N0. OF1 o$6 , FETTTX^a'EHER 3UBH&SH PARDE Aged About 32 yeers, S/ o Dharn< dhar R/ o Bh' 1 a'' , Teh, D< stt, Durg (M.P) . versus RESpO^DENTS 1, The Emg)loyinent Exchange Off^cer Employ^ent Exchange Darg^ 2. The Collector^Durg^ D-'stt. Durg M.p. 3. The Bh-'la4 Steel plant Through The Man&g^ ng H? rector, Bh^. 1 a^ D< stt. B^kacafc ( M. F) . Davgg WRlT FETlTlON UNDER ARTTCLE 226/2 27 GF THE CON3IPCfU^TuN" -OF I NBE X,- iil.iu-,^-^^'^—^- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURB CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon^ble Sliri Satish K. Aguihotori, J. W.P. No. 5083 OP 1996 Petitioner : Subhash Parde Versus Respondents The Eniployment Exchange Officer &ORS. None for the petitioner. Shri I.N. Shrivastava, paael lawyer for the respondents No. 1 and 2. Shn S,R.J. Jaiswal, coirasel for ffae resporident No.3. ORAL ORDBR (13tb June, 2006) The matter was called for headiig twice, On both occasions, none appeared uor aay representation was raade on behalf of fhe petitioner. Accordiagly, the writ petition is disiaissed for want of prosecution, Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 4-^1