:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1086 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 1086 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 1086 OF 2009 M/s. National Security Services ..Petitioner versus Smt. Asha Raghuvir Pardeshi & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. S. S. Patwardhan for the Petitioner. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. DATE : 5TH FEBRUARY, 2009 DATE : 5TH FEBRUARY, 2009 DATE : 5TH FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard. 2. This is a petition challenging the order condoning delay of a period of four years in filing an application under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The non-applicant No. 1 is the widow of the deceased workman who is said to have suffered a heart attack in the course of employment. The respondent No. 1 - widow however did not file a claim for compensation for a period of about four years. Along with the belated claim she filed an application for condonation of delay on the ground that she had received the death certificate in the :2: month of February 2005 and since it was an important document on which the claim rested, she could not file the claim in time. 3. The Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation, Pune, came to the conclusion that the respondent was justified in waiting for a copy of the certificate since that certificate would be crucial in proving the cause of death. The Commissioner held that the certificate was beyond the control of the respondent No. 1 and therefore the respondent No.1 was justified in filing the claim soon after the certificate was received in February 2005. Having regard to the circumstances of the case, I see no reason to interfere with the order which does not disclose any error of law apparent on the face of the record or any perversity. Petition is dismissed. (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.)