1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 628/2007 (Dinesh Todarwal V/s State of Rajasthan) Date of Order : 01/08/2007 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. P.N.Mohnani, for the petitioner. BY THE COURT:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Aggrieved by the order impugned dated 7.6.2007 passed by Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Bhilwara (for short 'the trial court' hereinafter) dismissing the application filed by the petitioner under Section 452 Cr.P.C. for release of the property involved in the Sessions case, the petitioner has filed the instant revision petition. It appears from the order impugned that the petitioner and others were put to trial for the offences under Sections 302 and 302/149 IPC and by judgment and order dated 7.2.2007 in Sessions Case No.3/05, the trial court convicted and sentenced the accused, against the said judgment and order, the 2 accused persons preferred a criminal appeal before this Court being D.B.Cr. Appeal No.134/2007 in which record has been received. It also appears from the order impugned that some of the accused namely Sunita, Dheeru and Manmohan Tiwadi have been absconding and they are yet to be tried on their arrest. In these circumstances, the trial court declined to pass final order with regard to the property involved in the said criminal case. Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the order impugned, I do not find any error, illegality or perversity in the order impugned warranting interference in the revisional jurisdiction. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will move before the Division Bench where the record of the trial court has been received. It is always open for the petitioner to seek remedy if available. The revision petition is therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. rp