RSA No.1047 of 2010(O & M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.1047 of 2010(O & M) Date of Decision:13.05.2010 Smt.Prem Lata Devi & Ors. .... appellants Versus Om Swarup Sharma & Ors. .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Naveen Sharma,Advocate for the appellants **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): CM No.5568-C of 2010 For the reasons mentioned in the application, this application is allowed and the deficiency in the court fee and delay, if any, in making up the deficiency in court fee, is condoned. CM disposed of. CM No.5569-C of 2010 This appeal has been filed by the appellants challenging the money decree. Vide order dated 20.04.2010 the case was adjourned to enable the appellant to comply with the provisions of Order 41 Rule 1(3) CPC which envisages that the appellant shall deposit the amount disputed in the appeal or furnish such security in respect thereof as the court may think fit. In the present application, the applicant has prayed that he be granted exemption from depositing/furnishing the security as envisaged RSA No.1047 of 2010(O & M) 2 aforesaid as the appellant is unable to arrange for the surety and to deposit the decretal amount. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted before this Court that the appeal is likely to be accepted and thus the exemption be granted as the appellant is a poor person. However, learned counsel for the appellants/applicant is unable to support the aforesaid argument by any precedent. In this view of the matter, this application is dismissed. RSA No.1047 of 2010(O & M) Since the appellants have failed to comply with the provisions of Order 41 Rule1(3) CPC, this appeal is dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 13.05.2010 neenu