;;..a a? ;:'^,is.?:^MI:^S^5%*».?3BKtaSi3»SSWIi :: a^d'^^y^^l^il;tf.^s^3i!^"K.iw^ .%%sttwfiC ^:^»:^^.:/:'.^~',?^^ ;"'i%r§.,y...:"':.:':\; ^::^ y:®t;ate.r|I^.%: ^SSs'Ss'eis^ fagaw^i,-! g:^lie®iiE.glien€i«a.:^fy^3.ifeee^ :^;'Ss"s:S&}!iM ^(laii WiW .; 'W^':|:Setg^B3iai^BtB.',!g,B*@» {±v)'::';'V»® 'S'S^ma^it'StSSeSSS^SSSSSX "'SSSi SfSSSS :l;.^.,,;,'^r3aa^gli|»^it^3^^ :^;®fcl'%|eii|;'.i^:©?'^^^^ ::<v^\.,';^i^:j||!||||ij(|i|||^^B:% r3'KriBgS®^|i|iK^%i.,iV?gS Ss'a'tS;'SSp;Bg!ilg S'SsSSsSSStSSS l;i| . '!•• i:-i; (^)^ ::^3BBjt*i.iilK:j^S<^.®®,:&^ :;::.:!.'I3aJi|t^Sgs-|||®.iS|BS£:<tt*i<^ ;;ffi®lB®?BS!BJI WS3SSWS, ^;; •/sEai.'ei'eua.aFS^sE^ie.l ®^:&:|%:^tlgfgilgigggilSSiSIBIIS 2-:?£SS£SBS;N;S @sUN8SUSaS SWWy:SSKffKiWSSiSS9iSS SSsSSS |! :::i^aiy|g|fcw|^|i.B|^?3ii|li||ij;iSg[|ISNIj@g 'l^iKWWSiffS^HS. .¥a;rt^6i®INr'slla-ig|BllgiiBJlSg^BiSgSliiKi i ^na.(Iej:;s i-J-^^^^^^t ^l^l^^ :M ^'^"It^^'•'^.Eu.ys^iB&^i^^^i^lBB dwl •^IWIri^l, t»wl<M<i<e,Roii'Myt iTOcCTCTt^ ...-^•^^^2-^^"-^FfZO 3(1^9113^ (icilgq.s) -«(. sn^TwfeiR' Hailaiii'iitptii' gWIT8R^lfid3II^?I 8B: Hon'ble 8hri ManindralMolianShrlvastava.J. du^cfly 20.01.2010 ShriT.K. Tiwari, counsel| Shri Bhaskar F^yasi, Ps|nel No. 1 to 3. This petition has been order of Anriexure A-l datt junior to fhe petitioner ha^ submitted that he was Inspector in fhe year 1981.| Annexure A-2, his name w^ would show that persons aj have been included in representation ntade by fhe was facing departmental ui<j on Tiim by order dated 28.: preferred, fhe order ofpuni^ Authority and he was reiast^ted selection exoueration fix>m chai^es, oa thc date when pcrsons fiaatty brought in fhe Annexure A-II. Reply on behalf of the my opiaion ends ofjusti.cc wjould *lflld41-f *fl*fdTiffe'd •<(uitsit ^'aiKli-aiS'il &n~ petitioiier, Lawyer for fhe State/respondents |Bled by the petitioner aggrieved w3s ^d 27.12.1996 by whlch tfae persons been promoted. The petitioner has appoiated on fhe post of Sub- In the qualifyit^ Ust of inspectors of is not iacluded. A perusal of fhe Ust [)pointed sutosequent to fhe petitioner |Che Vat Furfher perusat of the ^etitioner, it is revcaled fhat petitioner luiry aad a punishment was imposed 1995 against which oa appeal bcing jhmcnt was set aside by fhe AppeBate L. Petitioncr subinits fhat after his tds case was Uable to be considered as Ijuaiors to him were considered aad list in the year 1994-1995 vide resbondents has aot been filed so fiu-. In be scryed if a direction is issued i'fc v^., ,.^ .-^•gSSSS^. l.)'.,""^ "i;;. iB^§Si-l i'^!':WiCff8 -,''' A" ..s'' C3E dCT|T^WId<|,o-alwi<., R«i<H3'< qroOT^m^ sn^rqiTf^ito ganaii^iiinra' Sinha 3II^?T traiP (4c|ij<s|<;) 1Ft20 S^ITSR'uRrf SH^ST zl to fhe respondent to duly) petitioner and take dccteio^ fhe effect of exonerationl misconduct. The petitio4« representation ia contmua^ 15.11.1996 (Annexure A-Ifl the Conipetent Authority speakmg order, expeditiousl date ofreceipt ofthe repres^ With the aforesaid obserl of. It is made clear that thid ou the nierits of the case aufhority to take decision ia| <biy[ri41'l*ll*fc*T^"ls'^l '(luit^l't ^ari^HsiACT consideBO the representation of the on the same taking into consideration of petitioner fi"om the charges of ;r is so advised vaay filc fresh ion of his earlier representatfon dated On such representation being inade, iaU consider and decide the same by y aad not later than 4 luonfhs fi-oxu fhe ttation, if any, filed by fhe petitioncr. ^ations, the iastaat petition H deposed Court has not exprcssed any opinion a^id it wffl bc openea to fhe concemed laccordaace with law. ^ass Sd/- indraMoban lllul"judge '<tL ii,1 \