IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2011 / 28TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22529 of 2011(M) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ K.P.DEVAKI,W/O.K.C.JAYAN,(ASST.ENGINEER, PWD BUILDING SECTION)RESIDING AT VISUJA VILLA, POOVANTHURUTH.P.O,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 012. BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM MATHEW (VETTOOR) RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER,PWD ADMINISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. SMT.K.V.ALEYAMMA,ASST.ENGINEER, N.H.SECTION,KOLENCHERRY-682 311. R1 & R2 BY ADDL.ADVOCATE GENERAL SRI. K.A.JALEEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.22529/2011 M APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT UNDER ORDER NO.EB3 9444/2011 DTD. 17/08/2011. P2: COPY OF PROCEEDINGS ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT UNDER ORDER NO.EB3-25393/03 DTD.11/03/2008. P3: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT UNDER ORDER NO.EB3-2000/09 DTD. 06/02/2009. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.22529 of 2011-M. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 19th August, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is presently working as Assistant Engineer in the Public Works Department. This writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P1 order of transfer whereby the petitioner stands transferred from Building Section, Ettumanoor to Building Section, Thiruvalla. The grievance of the petitioner is that the fact that she is due to retire on 31.3.2012 was not taken into account by the respondents while issuing Ext.P1 order. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Additional Advocate General for respondents 1 and 2. The learned Additional Advocate General submits that in view of the aforesaid contentions of the petitioner Ext.P1 order would be reconsidered to the extent it pertains to the petitioner. In view of the said submission this writ petition is disposed of granting liberty WP(C).No.22529/2011-M. 2 to the petitioner to move the 2nd respondent by filing proper representation pointing out her claims, contentions and grievances against Ext.P1 order, within ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. In case the petitioner prefers such a representation within the above stipulated time the same shall be considered by the 2nd respondent expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of such representation, with notice to the person/persons likely to be affected. Till such time the petitioner shall be permitted to continue in the present station itself. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, (Judge) Kvs/-