•^-••^^ <Tfflc5T^'nq» ^vSi ^i«ic><4,y^ltl<l<»,Rlrtitiy'< ^-^ ^..^..^.:..i11.(p..±, 3n^?TcF)T(^Ttcp ^8H3n^$T(b^ 3TT^?T q^f»(yi^qcg) ^200 % ?^T^;Hf^T3TT^$T PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1. State Sccrct] DKSE Sccrcttsuv <bl^f^r< HRc!^'^fel^t ^Rl^ix ^3Tf^T3TT^^T Keju^am Nishad, aged 54 years, Son of late Shri Latk^ior, Ex-Driver, District Hospital, Chief Medi^al cum Health Officer, Uurg (CG) Versus povemnient of Chhattisgarh, Through fhe |suy, Public Hcalth Dcpartincnt Mmistry, |havaii, Raipur (CG) 3. Direct^ Depai'l •Ciiief Disuic n~ of Healfh Services, PubUc Healfti :inent, DKS Bhavaa preinises, Raipiir (CG) Medical Officer & Swastha Adhikad, |t Durg, Durg (CG) 4. Block | Mcdical Officcr, Gundcrdchi, Priiaary Healthl Center, Gunderdehi, Distiict Durg (CG) Writ Petition under Arttcle 226 ofthe Coiistitutioa ofladia S.B Hosa^ble Shri Dhiresdr^ Mishra, J. 12.11.2008 Shri B.K. Chakraboi^J Shri PK Bhaduri, PL fc^ The petitioner, by tl^ foUowuig relief: - counsel for tlie petitioner. r the State. uistaiit petition, has prayed for tlie "9.1 That, Uie| respondents may knidly be ordered to|pay the salaiy of the petitioner from Jaiiufov 1992 to the date ofdisBiissal dated 02.0^.2008. 9.2 That, in.tei|est @ 12% and heavy Utigation cost niay kjmdly be aUowedy giviag liberty to the Statel to recover the sajaie from respoiiden^s No, 3 and-4, whose acts are totally illeg^l." -_- ^^ i ^.•% ^. ^^ES^ ^TccT ^Klic1)^, u>^-l<l<»,Rrtl'<-l^'< _._L^ fcQ /^ . t^? <& %. TFT^T^^T^ ........................ ^Ft,200<?) 3TT^$Tc(?TRli<P ^nsn^^Taww L^ h 3n^9T q=R? (^clljclcg;) ?TcTT^R ^rf^T 3TT^$T ^- However, leamed couii|sel already pi^feiTed aii appeal dismissal dated 2.6.2008 (Ai|ine Services i.e. respondent No.2| a direction to tlie respoude|i speci&ed period. Learaed counsel for AunexLire P/ 11 shaU be ebiis th.ree moutlis from tlie date ot lu view ofabove submj the iastaiit petition is dispo^ No.2 to consider and dispos( petitiouer, on ifcs own ments three Bioutlis froiii tiie date o| cr)iq[^»1+1MoY^"fe^^Fjl^l^ !|!3lf^T3n^9T for tlie petitioner submits that he has ^Aiinexure P/ 11) agaiast tiie order of his inexure P/ 12] before tlie Director, Healfh aud this peution may be disposed ofwith iit No. 2 to decide tlie appeal wiflim a the State szibmits tliat tlie appeal of idered aud disposed ofwitiiin a period of receipt ofcopy ofthis order. tssioiis of leanied counsel for tlie paities, ^ed of witli a direction to the respondent of the appeal of Annexure P/ 11 of tlie ^u accordaiice with law, withtn. a period of receipt ofcopy ofthis order. ^^sa judge