IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5029 of 2003. Sukh Lal son of Shri Laxman and Others. VERSUS Badri Prasad son of Shri Kishori & Others Date Of Order ::: 07/03/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain J. Mr. Ravi Kasliwal, Counsel for the petitioners Mr. R.P. Choudhary, Counsel for the respondents By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition has been preferred by the Owner of the vehicle against the impugned order dated 17.07.2003 passed by the M.A.C.T. Bandikui District Dausa, whereby the application filed the claimants under Section 140 of the M.V. Act was allowed and the interim award of Rs.50,000/- was passed on the basis of no fault liability. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the trial Court has recorded a finding that the driver of the vehicle was not holding a valid license to ply the tractor at this stage and according to him the said finding may affect his case adversely during trial of the claim petition, therefore, those observations are liable to be set aside. Learned counsel for the respondents submits and agrees that this Court may observe that it will be open for the petitioner to argue the same point about the validity of driving license before the claims tribunal at the time of final disposal of the claim petition. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and after considering the same in the light of the impugned order passed by the Tribunal, I do not find any legal or factual error in the impugned order so as to interfere in the same. However, it is observed that it will be open for the petitioner to raise all points, which have been raised by him in this writ petition before the claim tribunal at the time of final disposal of the claim application according to law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is dismissed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. ashok/