1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1691 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1893 OF 2009 Smt. Aruna Sunil Yenpure & Anr. .... Applicants Vs. Pune Municipal Corporation .... Respondent Mr. Ravi Kadam, Advocate for applicants. Mrs. Sadhana Mahashabde, Advocate for respondent. \ Coram : A.P. Deshpande & SMT. R.P. SondurBaldota, JJ. Date : 3rd May, 2010 P.C. 1. By the present application, the applicant-appellant seeks restoration of the appeal, which came to be dismissed on 27th January 2010 for non prosecution. The reason assigned in the application for absence of the counsel is to the effect that the lady Advocate who was engaged by the applicant-appellant got married sometime in November 2009 and had informed the applicant-appellant that she will not be able to continue with the practice in the High Court and had also advised the applicant- appellant to engage another lawyer. Therefore, the applicant-appellant 2 has engaged another Advocate and from him he came to know that the appeal was already dismissed for non prosecution. 2. For the reasons set out in the application, the impugned order dismissing the appeal for non prosecution on account of absence of Advocate of applicant/appellant is set aside. The appeal is restored to file. (Smt.R.P. SondurBaldota,J) (A.P. DESHPANDE, J.)