IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL WRIT No. 3693 of 2007 KISHAN LAL V/S A.D.J. ,NO.2, CHITTORGARH & ORS. Mr. DIGVIJAY SINGH for Mr. RAMANDEEP S. SIDHU, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 4.7.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. A look at the impugned order shows that this is an order passed on consent of the learned counsel. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that as a matter of fact, consent was not given. Suffice it to say that even if that were the situation, appropriate remedy would have been to file a review petition, and not to challenge by way of a writ petition. It is a different story that even in the writ petition, this is not the averment, as a matter of fact, that concession was not made. Learned counsel was requested to point out the specific pleading, and learned counsel relied upon ground- E, and even therein all that has been pleaded is that the order dated 2.1.2007 passed on the basis of concession of learned counsel for the petitioner was opposed on the material available on record. Thus, in my view, thee is no sufficient ground to interfere with the impugned order in my writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/