IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.misc. 34058 M of 2009 Date of decision:- 14.1.2010 Karandeep Singh petitioner vs State of Haryana Respondent Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate Ms.Sbubra Singh, DAG, Hry Mr. B.S.Virk, Advocate M.M.S.BEDI,J. This order will dispose of two connected petitions for grant of pre-arrest bail filed by Karandeep Singh (Cr.Misc. 34058 M of 2009) and Harjinder Singh (Cr.Misc.35379 of 2009). The case of the prosecution, as registered at the instance of Kultar Singh is to the effect that he had been inflicted injuries on 17.4.2009 by 7/8 persons, armed with deadly weapons and the belongings of the complainant were snatched after detaining the complainant along with Narender and Lakhwinder Singh in a room. Counsel for the complainant and State counsel have opposed the petitions for pre-arrest bail on the ground that a large number of injuries have been inflicted on the person of Kultar and Narender, out of which some injuries are grievous. Offence u/s 307 IPC was added in the present case on the next date after lodging of the FIR and in support of the addition of offence u/s 307 IPC, medical report of the Doctor dated 22.6.2009 has been relied upon, wherein the Doctor has opined that if the injuries received on the hand would have been received on the head, it would have been dangerous to the life. It will be a moot point during trial whether, on the basis of such a medical opinion, offence u/s 307 IPC could be added. Besides this, I have carefully gone through the allegations against the petitioners. Petitioner Karandeep Singh has not been specifically named in the FIR. He has been described as one of the sons of Jassa, who was a member of the unlawful assembly. There is no specific injury attributed to him. So far as petitioner Harjinder Singh is concerned, he is not even named in the FIR. It is contended that Harjinder Singh is described as Sonu in the FIR. No specific injury has been attributed to Harjinder Singh and Karandeep Singh. The petitioners have already joined the investigation. Co-accused of the petitioners have already been granted the concession of bail. Accordingly, the petitions are allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioners, they will be admitted to bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the condition that they will appear before the investigating officer as and when required by the police and will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation at any stage. They will not commit the similar offence, of which they are accused of during pendency of the trial. In case of violation of any of the above said condition, it will be open to the prosecution or the complainant to seek cancellation of pre-arrest bail. January 14 ,2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) TSM JUDGE