f€"^\ I 1 w0 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (227t No. 6047 of 2011 PBTITIONBR PLAINTIFP RESPONDBNTS VERSUS 1. 8. Liaus Kerketta, S/o Matias Kerketta, aged about 47 yeai's, R/o MIG-30, Sagar deep enclave, Uuslapur Aineri post Maagla, TehsH takhatpur, Dist. BUaspur, C.G. Cent baiik hoine finaiice Itd. Through braach maaager suiya bhawan, juna Bilaspur Tah. BUaspur, C.G. Sudip Kuixiar niukharjee, S/o Late Surya kumar Mukherjee, aged about 56 years, Occupation Head Cashier R/o Baak of Baroda, R/o Near Heinu Colony Chowk, Raipur road jarahbatha, Distt. Bilaspur, C.G. Tapas Kuinar Mukharjee, S/o Late Surya kumar Mukherjee, aged about 46 years, Occupatioii Head Cashier C.S.E.B. R/o Near Heinu Colouy Chowk, Raipur road jarahbatha, Distt. Bilaspur, C.G. Shaatunu Choudhaiy, S/o shn T.D. Chaudhari, Aged about 43 years, R/o Shailendra Nagar, Village Ainari, Post Mangla Tahs Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur, C.G. Saatosh Kuinar Saliu, S/o Maasha Raai Sahu, Aged about 37 years, Occupation Colonoizer Developer-Controcter-Pronioter, R/o Tifra, Post Tifm Distt. BUaspur C.G. Smt, Boondi Bai, W/o Jagashwer Yadav, Aged about 72 years, R/o near of Ajaata swaaiil MungeH Road, Tah Distt. BUaspur C.G. H.D.F.C. Baak Ltd. Through its Braach Manager, Liak Road BilaspurTah/Distt BUaspur C.G. State of C.G. Thomgh District Magistorate, BUaspur C.G. WRIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLB 227 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Honyble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri Ravi Kumar Bhagat, Advocate for the petitioner. Respondents not noticed. ORDBR (Passed on 13/10/2011) ^^-^^ ^"-^ "^ 1 -^— ^ 1. By fhis petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India petitioner has chaUenged the legality aad propriety of fhe order dated 9/4/2010 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bilaspur (C.G.) m M.J.C. No. 27/10. 2. After some argument, leamed counsel for flie petitioner submits fhat he seeks to wifhdraw this petition wifti liberty to file appropriate petition before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bilaspur or before aay ofher coinpetent foruin. 3. Prayer allowed. 4. Consequently, petition is dismissed as witlidrawn withaforesaid liberty. No order as to costs. 5. Intermi appUcation staads disposed of, 6. Certilied copy of fhe order impugned be retuned to fhe leamed counsel for fhe petitioner on his submittuig duly attested photostat copy of fhe same. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^