S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 2134/2009 (Rakesh Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 15/04/2009 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. R.C.Joshi for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Prajapat, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and police investigation diary. I have carefully gone through the FIR lodged by injured Laxman Singh. In the FIR, three persons have been named namely Neehal Singh, Daleep and Bala Punia. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, Neehal Singh, Balram, Begraj and Subhash have been granted bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court by order dated 6.2.2009. So far as the present petitioner is concerned, he has not been named in the FIR and no specific role has been assigned to him. Even in the statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. no specific role has been assigned to the present petitioner. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merit of the case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Rakesh Kumar S/o Bal Ram be released on bail in FIR No. 76/08, P.S. Sadar, Hanumangarh, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP