1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8715 OF 2009 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8720 OF 2009 Shivram Girjuba Langote and others ..PETITIONERS -VERSUS- Govindsingh Jagannathsingh Naik and others ..RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. S.S. Choudhari holding for Mr.P.D. Suryawanshi, advocate for petitioners. Mr. A.D. Kasliwal, advocate for respondent nos.1, 2/2 to 2/4 and 3. Mr.K.J. Ghute Patil, A.G.P. for respondent nos.4, 5 and 6. ..... CORAM : R.M.BORDE,J DATE : 26th August, 2010 PER COURT : 1. Petitions are presented objecting to the ongoing execution proceedings initiated by Decree Holder by presenting Regular Darkhast No.368/2001. 2. I have perused the objection applications tendered by the petitioners, in which, only the prayers, those are made are in respect of grant of 2 stay to the delivery of possession. No specific objections seems to have been made in the said objection applications. Apart from this, it is pointed out that, the objections raised by the petitioners have been dealt with by the Tahsildar and judgment has been delivered on 21.01.2010. The said order appears to have been challenged before the Sub-Divisional Officer, who has also turned the appeal in view of the order passed on 21.01.2010 by two different orders. 3. In this view of the matter, it appears that all the attempts are being made by the petitioners which are only for protracting litigation and cause delay in delivery of possession. 4. There is no substance in the Petitions and hence both the petitions stand rejected. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE gas/wp8715.09