1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.JYOTHIMANI AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.A.(MD).No.689 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2011 S.Ramachandran : Appellant Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts, Genes Road, Saidapet, Chennai-15. 2.The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Madurai. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 02.11.2010 made in W.P.(MD).No.7325 of 2010 on the file of this Court. WP(MD)No.7325 OF 2010 is presented to this case under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records in RC.No.22809/2009/Q3, dated 15.06.2009 on the file of the first respondent, to quash the same and to direct the first respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with full benefits within time frame fixed by the Court. For Appellant : Mr.S.Palanivelayutham JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was delivered BY P.JYOTHIMANI, J] The Writ Appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge in a batch of cases including the present one in W.P.(MD)Nos.2704 of 2010, etch batch, dated 02.11.2010, wherein the learned Single Judge has dismissed the Writ Petition filed by the appellant herein. The Writ Petition was filed on the ground that the appellant and others, who were kept under suspension in the year 2009, have not been proceeded with departmentally and, therefore, it was on the ground of prolonged suspension, the Writ Petition was https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 filed challenging the order of suspension. The learned Single Judge, having found that a criminal case has been filed against the appellant in respect of the grave charges of obtaining bribe from a pensioner and it is a case of corruption, has held that it is not a case for interference by this Court, which, in our considered view, needs not be interfered with. 2. However, it is stated that the criminal case has been pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai and if such criminal case is pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai, it is for the learned Magistrate to expedite the trial in the manner known to law. 3. Except the above observation, no further order is required. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal stands dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (P&A) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai. 2.The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts, Genes Road, Saidapet, Chennai-15. 3.The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Madurai. +1cc to The Special Government Pleader SR.No.25381 SML akm/08.08.11 /2p-5c/ Judgment made in W.A.(MD).No.689 of 2011 Dated:- 29.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/