IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. 3108-M of 2007 DATE OF DECISION : 18.01.2007 Vimal Anand .... PETITIONER Versus Gurdeep Kaur Sapra ..... RESPONDENT CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. G.S. Lalli, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * Petitioner Vimal Anand, who is complainant, has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of complaint No. 193 dated 15.6.2002 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. I have heard counsel for the petitioner and gone through the contents of the complaint. In the petition, it has been alleged that at one point of time, complainant had entered into compromise with the petitioner before the Lok Adalat and she had also accepted part of the amount. Later on, she backed out from the said compromise. In my opinion, no body can be compelled to enter into compromise in the Lok Adalat. On such ground, the complaint and subsequent proceedings can not be quashed. Dismissed. January 18, 2007 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE