1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.285 OF 2009 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.20702 OF 2009 M/s Jyoti Builders .. Applicant -versus Dhapubai Vyas (decd Narayanlal Vyas .. Respondent Mr. Neel Pungaliya i/b Mr A.M. Pungliya, for the applicant Mr. Shravan M Vyas for the respondent No.l CORAM: MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J DATED: 13th January, 2010 P.C. 1. This application is preferred praying for condonation of delay of l40 days. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent opposed the application on the ground that after the withdrawal of the writ petition on 8.5.2009, present CRA was not filed immediately, but was filed after l05 days ie on 25th August, 2009. He points out that the applicants have failed to give any reason explaining the delay. 2. There is substance in the submission of learned counsel for the respondent. However, on query, learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that due to oversight and some mistake, 2 the petition could not be filed within the time. So also the applicants admit that they have not quoted any genuine reason while explaining the delay. Learned counsel further submits that the suit of the respondent ie original plaintiff was dismissed and the applicants ie original defendants have lost in appeal and so they have preferred this CRA. 3. Considering these facts the application for condonation of delay is allowed. The delay of 140 days is condoned on condition that the applicants to deposit costs of Rs.5,000/- out of which Rs. 3,000/- are to be paid to the respondent and Rs.2,000/- to be paid to Legal Aid Committee. The costs to be deposited within one week, otherwise it will be dismissed without further reference to the Court. 4. The Civil application stands disposed of accordingly. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)