IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31924 of 2009 YASIN @ MD.YASIN, SON OF LATE BASIRUDDIN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-DIYARI MARGAMA, P.S. ARARIA, DISTRICT-ARARIA…………….PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………..OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the State : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 3. 28.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 395/397 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the informant has stated that he had seen the miscreants and can identify them. The informant and the petitioner belong to the same village. However, it is submitted that even then the informant could not name him in the First Information Report. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been made accused, after four months of the occurrence, merely on the basis of suspicion. There is no recovery of any incriminating article from the possession of the - 2 - petitioner. It is stated that though the petitoner is in jail custody since 6.6.2009, still he has not been put on T.I. Parade. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Yasin @ Md. Yasin, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Araria, in connection with Araria P.S. Case No.78/2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)