3 % 30.o8.20LL Present: Mr. Rajiv Sawhney, Senior Advocate with Mr. Advocates for the Appellant. Mr. Prag Chawla and Ms. Nishi Chaudhary, #20 & 2L Vineet Jhanji, Advocates for Respondent no.17. Mr. Siddharth Gautam and Mr. Sunaina Kumar, Advocates for respondent no.26 in FAO (OS) No.328l20LI. Mr. Aditya Mohan, Advocate for respondent no.31. Mr. Mohit Mathur, Advocate for respondents no.l to 3 and 6 and 7. f FAO No. 3r8 ^O11 & These appeals are preferred against the order dated 2no June, 20LL passed by learned Single Judge in the applications preferred by the appellant/ plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of Civil Procedure Code. Those applications are still pending. The appellant herein wanted ex parte injunction which was not granted and for that reason the present appeals were filed. When these appeals came up for hearing on 15th July, 2011, while issuing notice to the respondents, this Division Bench was prima facie convinced that the appellants had made out a case for ex parte injunction. Accordingly, ad interim injunction was issued restraining the respondents, their agents, assigns, relatives, representatives and/or any other person claiming under them from in any manner disposing of, alienating, transferring, encumbering and/or creating any third party rights in the immovable properties mentioned in the plaint of the plaintift as mentioned in paragraphs 21 and 22 of the plaint and from withdrawing any amount from the bank accounts as mentioned in paragraphs 21 to 27 of the plaint. lt was further clarified that the orders dated L5.07.20II shall cover all the movable property and investments mentioned in paras 21 to 27 of the plaint. Most of the respondents are served, however, service in respect of some of the respondents is still awaited. Be that as it may, the contesting respondents are respondents no. 1 to 3 and 6 and 7 on whose behalf Mr. Mathur, Advocate has appeared today. After hearing the counsel for the parties, we dispose of these appeals with the direction that the orders dated 15th July, 201-I which is further clarified on 9th August, 201-L shall remain in operation till the next date of hearing i.e. 1't November 20IL, when these Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified suits listed for hearing of applications under Order XXXIX Rule 39 CPC before the learned Single Judge. lt would be open to learned Single Judge to pass the orders after hearing the parties on the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC. We may also record at this stage that learned counsel for the respondent 17 and 31 have stated at the bar that they are ready and willing to deposit the money in the court which was received by them from respondents no.1 to 3, their predecessors in interest. They can move appropriate application or make a statement in this behalf before the learned Single Judge. The appeals stand disposed of in terms of above order. JA<k M.L. MEHTA, J. AUGUST 30, 2OI.1 rd o A/K. StKRt, J.