IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 502 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 92 OF 2009 MHALSA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY THROUGH CHAIRMAN/MANAGER ... Applicant Versus SMT. RANJANA S. POWAR AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. V. A. Lawande,Advocate for the applicant/ original respondent No.3. Mr. J.P.Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the original petitioner. Mr.V.Rodrigues, Additional Govt. Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Coram:- B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 13th July, 2009 P.C. Heard. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that in order to show his respect for the process of Court and bonafides, the respondent No.3 has handed over all the papers to the Deputy Director of Education without prejudice to his rights. The learned Government Counsel states that as per the directions issued on 22.06.2009, the Administrator has already taken appropriate decision by conducting D.P.C. The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that if the statement is correct then the order is already implemented. 2. In the circumstances, we don't find any reason to recall the order dated 22.06.2009. The application is, therefore, rejected. B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. U. D. SALVI, J. SMA