1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR : J U D G M E N T : D.B. CIVIL HABEAS CORPUS PETITION NO.2790/2010 (Dinesh Kumar Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of Judgment : 25.03.2010 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KAPADIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. Shambhoo Singh, for the petitioner. Mr. B.K. Mehar, Govt. Counsel. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner Dinesh Kumar has preferred this habeas corpus petition on the ground that the corpus is his wife and she is in illegal detention but this fact is not correct because no marriage certificate has been placed on record, so also, the corpus is living in Nari Niketan under the order passed by SDM, Pindwara. In this view of the matter, this habeas corpus petition is not maintainable. 2 In this petition, an application has been filed by the corpus who is living in Nari Niketan, Jodhpur under the order passed by SDM, Pindwara that although she made her statement before the SDM, Pindwara that I am 23 years old and I am entitled to live as per my desire but SDM, Pindwara has passed an order contrary to her statement, therefore, the said order may be quashed and order may be passed for her release from Nari Niketan, Jodhpur. In our opinion, no such order can be passed in the habeas corpus petition, the applicant can challenge the order of SDM, Pindwara by way of filing revision or misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Therefore, the application filed by the applicant Meena is disposed of with the liberty to challenge the order of SDM, Pindwara in accordance with the law. With above observation, this habeas corpus petition is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J (A.M. KAPADIA), J arun