1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.12.2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.(MD)No.14027 of 2011 V.Selvaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary to Home Department, Fort.St. George,Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai,Mylapore,Chennai-600 004. 3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirunelveli Range,Tirunelveli. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil,Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 28.07.2011 and consequently directing the second and third respondents to fix seniority and give all monitory benefits in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.36 dated 11.01.2002. For Petitioner :Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For Respondents :Mr.B.Pugalendhi,Spl. Government Pleader O R D E R The petitioner was posted as Grade-II Police Constable at Madras City on 15.12.1973. He was upgraded to Grade-I Police Constable in the year 1993. Later on, he was again promoted to the post of Head Constable on 08.01.1998. But, the grievance of the petitioner is that when he was eligible to be upgraded as a Special Sub-Inspector of Police on completion of ten years as a Head Constable on 09.01.2008 itself and though he has been given all periodical increments, his case was not considered to the post of Special Sub-Inspector of Police. However, in the meanwhile, when there was a pay anomaly, he also filed an Original Application before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal and the same was transferred to this Court as W.P.No.2316 of 2006. Subsequently, the petitioner withdrew the said petition on 21.06.2011 with a liberty to challenge the pay fixation. 2.When the matter stands as above, the learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that he reached the age of superannuation on 31.03.2009. Subsequently, the petitioner submitted his representation on 28.07.2011 with a request to fix his seniority and give him the monetary benefits in accordance with the G.O.No.36 dated 11.01.2002. Though the said representation was pursued by the repeated reminders, the respondents have not considered. Hence, the petitioner filed this writ petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3.By considering his limited prayer, this Court directs the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 28.07.2011 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with the law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. With the above direction the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. SD ASST REGISTRAR(RTI ACT) /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST REGISTRAR To, 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary to Home Department, Fort.St. George,Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai,Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. 3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirunelveli Range,Tirunelveli. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil,Kanyakumari District. 1cc To The Special Government Pleader, Madurai Bench in SR No.43250 SB:27/12/2011 2P 6C W.P.(MD)No. 14027 of 2011 09.12.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/