IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21658 of 2010 BECHU BARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 08.09.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Renewing the prayer for bail the period of custody since 8.12.2008 is emphasized. Counsel for the State points out identification of the petitioner in the T.I. Parade and that the petitioner has antecedent of four more cases of a similar nature. Considering the period of custody and the antecedent also this Court considers it proper to direct that let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 40,000/- (Forty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Kaimur at Bhabua in Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 32 of 2008. Both the sureties must be the father and wife of the petitioner respectively. The photograph and proof of residence of the sureties shall be appended to the bail bonds which shall be verified through the local police before final acceptance. The petitioner is required to be properly represented on each date in the trial including his physical appearance on specified dates that the Court below directs so that the trial may be expedited. If the petitioner defaults for either of the reasons the court below shall be at liberty to deal with him appropriately notwithstanding the present order so that the trial be facilitated. If the petitioner will be involved in any criminal case during trial it shall be a clear case of misuse of the privilege of bail. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)