RFA No.358 of 2000. 25.09.2007 Present: Ms.Devyani Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr.Romesh Verma, Advocate, for the respondents-claimants No.1 to 4. Mr.Rajan Dewan, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.11. CMP No. 1006 of 2007. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The application is allowed and the name of appellant No.1 is ordered to be changed as prayed for. Amended memo has been filed. Be taken on the record. The application is disposed of. CMP No. 1007 of 2007. This application has been filed by the appellants with the prayer that the appeal may be permitted to be withdrawn in view of out of court settlement arrived at between the parties. Photocopy of the agreement of out of court settlement has been filed with this application as Annexure A-2. The application is not opposed by the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no reply is intended to be filed and the application be allowed as prayed for. The parties agree and undertake to aide by the compromise. The application is accordingly allowed. Permission is granted to the appellants to withdraw the appeal. The application is disposed of. RFA No. 358 of 2000. Dismissed as withdrawn. All interim orders shall stand vacated. CMP No. 1008 of 2007. Allowed. Court fee in accordance with law is directed to be refunded to the appellants. (2) RFA No. 358 of 2000. The respondents submit that they have filed RFA No.7 of 2001 arising out of the same award. It is clarified that in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the respondents will not be allowed to claim enhancement for market value awarded. The appeal will be heard on the other points raised therein. September 25, 2007 ( Dev Darshan Sud ) (aks) Judge