IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40601 of 2009 1.KUNTI DEVI, 2.DAULTI DEVI, 3.ROBIN YADAV, 4.MAKESHWAR YADAV @ MAKU YADAV & 5.DILIP YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 7.1.2010. Heard. The petitioner Kunti Devi is the mother of Mantu Yadav whereas other petitioners are his family members being the Bhabhi and brothers of the said Mantu Yadav. The case is that the above named accused Mantu Yadav got access to the complainant and sexually exploited her. Besides, the complainant was taken away to a particular place and thereafter she was deserted. As regards the present set of five petitioners as may appear they are simply alleged to have taken away the victim along with the main accused Mantu Yadav. From the very reading of the complaint petition, the case appears of taking away in which the complainant was voluntarily participating which does not appear the case of enticing away or forcibly taking away, considering which, let the above named five petitioners be directed to be released on bail, either in the event of their arrest by the police or surrender in the court below on furnishing bonds of Rs.5,000/-(five - 2 - thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in Lakhisarai Chanan P.S.Case No.553 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2)of the Cr.P.C. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )