IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2010 / 30TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 30214 of 2010(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.RAJAGOPALAN, EXECUTIVE TRUSTEE, KOMAN GURUKKAL MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST, NILESHWAR, P.O.KARINDHALAM, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN SRI.PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR SMT.VANDANA MENON SMT.ANJU P.NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPT. OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM-695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, DEPT. OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM-695 001. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANHANGAD EDUCATIONAL DISTRICT, KANHANGAD-671 315. 4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHITHRARIKKAL, KASARAGOD-671 121. 5. K.VISHWANATHAN, S/O.KARIMBI KUNHAMBU, R/AT PALATHADAM, PEROLE VILLAGE, NILESHWAR, HOSDURG TALUK, P.O.PUTHARIADUKKAM, KASARAGOD DISTRICT-671 121. 6. K.SUSHEELA, S/O.KARIMBIL KUNHAMBU, R/AT KUMBALAPPALLY, KARINDALAM VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, P.O.PERIYANGANAM, KASARAGOD DISTRICT-671 121. ADV. SRI.JAWAHAR JOSE FOR R5 TO 6 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------ W.P.(C).No.30214 OF 2010 ------------------------------ Dated this the 22 nd day of October, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner claims that in the General Body meeting held on 16.8.2009 of the members constituting the educational agency, the petitioner was elected as the Executive Trustee and Manager of (1)Karimbil High School and (2) Sri.Koman Gurukkal Memorial A.U.P School. The petitioner states that it was realised later that respondent Nos. 5 and 6 were approved by the educational authority as the Manager of the Schools. The petitioner preferred appeals before the District Educational Officer and the Director of Public Instruction against those orders. The appeals were dismissed. Against the appellate orders, the petitioner filed Exts.P1 and P2 revisions before the Government. The revision petitions were posted for hearing on 19.6.2010. It is stated that the revisions were heard on 19.6.2010 and orders were reserved. W.P.(C).No.30214 OF 2010 2 2. The only relief prayed for by the petitioner in the Writ Petition is for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to pass orders on Exts.P1 and P2 revisions at the earliest. Learned counsel for respondents 5 and 6 also submitted that an early disposal of the revisions is necessary. 3. The learned Government Pleader submitted, on instructions, that final orders will be passed on Exts.P1 and P2 within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment by the first respondent. 4. Taking into account the facts and circumstances and also the submission made by the learned Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to finally dispose of Exts.P1 and P2 revisions as expeditiously as possible, and at any rate within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a W.P.(C).No.30214 OF 2010 3 copy of the judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the Writ Petition and a certified copy of the judgment before the first respondent. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE. cms