IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10443 of 2010 1. RAMESH SINGH , SON OF JAGDISH SINGH 2. MANORMA DEVI, WIFE OF VISHAN SINGH @ VISHAM SINGH 3. PANKA J KUMAR SINGH S/O VISHAN SINGH @ VISHAM SINGH 4. RANI DEVI WIFE OF PANKAJ SINGH 5. GOLDEN SINGH @ GUNTUN SINGH SON OF VISHAN SINGH @ VISHAM SINGH 6. PRAVEEN SINGH S/O VISHAN SINGH @ VISHAM SINGH 7. CHINTUN SINGH S/O VISHAN SINGH @ VISHAM SINGH ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HAREL,P.S. MOHIDDINAGAR,DISTT- SAMASTIPUR… PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SULEKHA DEVI WIFE OF RAMESH SINGH, R/V- HAREL, P.S. MOHIDDINAGAR, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR.. OPP. PARTIES. ----------- 2 22-4-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner no.1 is husband of the complainant and petitioners 2 to 7 are relations of petitioner no.1. The offence is under section 498-A and other sections of the I.P.C. Considering all the facts and circumstances the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner nos. 2 to 7 is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks, let petitioner nos. 2 to 7 namely Manorma Devi, Pankaj Kumar Singh, Rani Devi, Golden Singh @ Guntun Singh, Praveen Singh and Chintun Singh be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.7,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Complaint Case No. 1432/2008, subject to the conditions laid down under sections 438(2) Cr.P.C.. Considering the special responsibility of petitioner no.1 as a 2 husband to keep the complainant with dignity, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner no.1 if he surrenders and seeks regular bail. It has been submitted that petitioner no.1 is desirous to compromise his difference with the complainant. In that view of the matter ten weeks time is granted and within that time petitioner no.1 can settle his differences with the complainant. Within the same time if petitioner no.1 surrenders and files compromise petition in the court below then he shall be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur. Otherwise his prayer for bail shall be considered on its own merit. For a period of ten weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against petitioner no.1 Ramesh Singh in Complaint Case No. 1432/08 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)