IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2009 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 34979 of 2009(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. POULOSE, AGED 57, S/O. KURIAN, CHIRAKKARA MATTATHIL, KADAKKANADU, MAZHUVANNUR. 2. KUNJAMMA, W/O. POULOSE, AGED 52, CHIRAKKARA MATTATHIL, KADAKKANADU, MAZHUVANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.T.RAJESH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALUVA. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNNATHUNADU. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNNATHUNADU. 4. JOHN, S/O. KURIAN, CHIRAKKARA MATTATHIL, KADAKKANADU, MAZHUVANOOR. BY ADVS. SRI.GEO PAUL SRI.NOEL JOSEPH SRI.SANU MATHEW SRI.K.V.REJANISH SRI.C.R.PRAMOD GOVT. PLEADER SRI. T.K. VIPINDAS -R1 AND R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO. 34979/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: Ext.P1: A true copy of the intimation forwarded to the 3rd respondent by the Doctor of the Government hospital, Vadavukode. Ext.P2: A true copy of the complaint lodged by the 2nd petitioner before the 3rd respondent. Ext.P3: A true copy of the complaint lodged before the Deputy Superintendent of Police dated 28.11.2009. Ext.P4: A true copy of the communication sent by the priest of the parish. Ext.P5: A true copy of the plaint in O.S. 330 of 2009 pending before the Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor. Ext.P6: A true copy of the representation submitted by the petitioner before the 1st respondent. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ. --------------------------------------------- W.P. (C) NO. 34979 OF 2009 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of December, 2009 JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. In the matter of police protection, there is already an interim order dated 4.12.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no further orders are necessary in view of the interim order. The Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of in terms of the interim order, making it also clear that in case the petitioners have any grievance with regard to the laches or lapses on the part of the police, it will be open to them to approach the police complaint authority. (KURIAN JOSEPH) JUDGE (C.T. RAVIKUMAR) JUDGE sp/ 2 KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ. W.P.(C)NO.34979/2009 JUDGMENT 17th December, 2009