Lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLAATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1954 OF 2005 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.614 PF 2003 Shri Vasudeo Mahadeo Surve & Anr. : Applicants. Versus Rajiv Manohar Vartak & ors. : Respondents. Ms Sunita Bhalinge i/by Mr.Atul Damle for the Applicants. CORAM : C L PANGARKAR, J DATED : 21st JANUARY 2010 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicants. 2. This application has been filed for restoration of the appeal which came to be dismissed for non removal of the office objection and for condonation of delay in preferring this application. The Appeal came to be dismissed because the office objection was not removed. It is stated that the clerk who was supposed to take care of the appeal, had lost the track of the appeal and the appeal came to be dismissed. There was no negligence on the part of the applicants or his advocate. Companion Appeal being Second Apeal No.774 of 2001 is pending for admission. 3. In view of the fact that the other appeal is still pending for admission, this appeal stands restored to file. Delay stands condoned. Civil Application stands disposed of. [C.L.PANGARKAR,J]