IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2008 / 27TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 8852 of 2008(D) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- PRASANNA KUMARI W/O. VIJAYAN, KESAVA SADANAM, MARAYOOR, RESIDING AT ARASSERIL HOSE, PUTHUPALLY VILLAGE KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.I.ABDUL SALAM RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. FOREST RANGE OFFICER,MARAYOOR 2. DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, MUNNAR, IDUKKI. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, MARAYOOR. 4. THAHASILDAR, DEVIKULAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER RANJITH THAMPAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 8852 OF 2008 D ==================== Dated this the 17th day of March, 2008 J U D G M E N T The claim raised in this writ petition is two fold. One is for the value of the timber mentioned in Ext.P4, which according to the petitioner was cut and removed by the forest authorities. The other is for a certificate for claiming value in respect of the timber mentioned in Ext.P6. Ext.P4 is pending before the 1st respondent and Ext.P6 is pending before the 4th respondent. 2. In view of the above, I dispose of this writ petition directing that if Exts. P4 and P6 have been received and are pending before respondents 1 and 4 respectively, the aforesaid respondents shall take up, consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereof. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner has yet another claim for the value of the timber mentioned in Ext.P7, a report dated 24th of January, 2005. If he has such WPC 8852/08 :2 : a claim, I clarify that it will be open to the petitioner to pursue the same before the appropriate authority. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp