IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-32105 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.10.2011 Amanpreet and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Navjinder S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioners. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition, filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is for the issuance of a direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners from respondents No.4 and 5. Both the petitioners are personally present before this Court. I have personally examined both of them. Petitioners have stated that private respondents have lodged an FIR against petitioner No.2, therefore, this petition has been filed with the object that no action be taken against petitioner No.2 pursuant to the said FIR lodged by the parents of petitioner No.1. Both of them have stated that they have no life threat. They have further stated that they have filed this petition with the object to get their marriage approved so that no action could be taken against them pursuant to FIR. Provisions of Section 482 Cr.P.C. or Article 226 of the Constitution of India should not be allowed to be invoked to get the marriage approved because it involves question of fact. Therefore, I am not inclined to entertain this petition. Dismissed. (Alok Singh) Judge October 20, 2011 R.S.