IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52774 of 2008 1. SAROJ DEVI 2. Gupteshwar Sharma Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 19.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the complainant alleged for demand and torture for its non-fulfillment, while the rejection order clearly shows the claim of the petitioners about their having no concern in relation to matrimonial case between husband and wife. In such circumstances, in my view, the petitioners’ arrest is not justified. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 1801 of 2007, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Magistrate, Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)