IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30014 of 2006 SRI KANT THAKUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 14 7.7.2008 Heard the counsels. The parties are present in Court. The Court has earlier ordered that the parties should try to live together and it was agreed that the opposite party no. 2 along with the son would go to the house of petitioner at Muzaffarpur and a month thereafter she would go and live with her husband. However, this could not take place and the parties have in fact not reunited and are living separately at their respective houses. Subject to the conditions re-uniting of the parties was a condition by this Court that the petitioner would meet the expenses for education of his son and his wife. In the mean time, the petitioner’s elder son Rohit Ranjan has competed for M.B.A. and requires Rs. 1,15,000/- for admission. The petitioner undertakes to take a loan for his education so that his son may be able to secure a bright future. Ami Ranjan, the younger son is at Kota and a sum of Rs. 25,000/- has been paid by the petitioner against 26,000/- which was required for his course. I think the petitioner is taking adequate steps to secure the future of his sons and we hope that he will continue to meet his responsibility. In the circumstances, no order need be passed. It is made clear that this Court is not interfering with the order passed by the Court below granting maintenance. Although, the sons of the - 2 - petitioner are now major. This application stands disposed of on the terms aforesaid. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)