IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3168 of 2011. Date of Decision : May 10, 2011 Ravinder Kumar … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others … Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Jia Lal Bhardwaj, Advocate For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 5. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved since the lawful orders passed by the Director of Elementary Education have been varied by the Deputy Director, Elementary Education as well as the Block Elementary Education Officer. There will be a direction to the second respondent to look into the matter on the petitioner’s producing a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the second respondent and take an appropriate action, in accordance with law, in the matter. The second respondent will also look into the allegation that the sixth respondent has been permitted to join duty without duly relieving the petitioner and if it is found that any irregularity has been committed in the process, salary of 2 one person for the duplicating period shall be recovered from the officer responsible in that regard. Needful action shall be taken within a period of ten days from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the second respondent. In case the petitioner is relieved in the meanwhile, it will be open for him to avail the leave of kind due, till orders are passed, as above, by the second respondent. 2. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. May 10, 2011 (PK/Pankaj)