^t^"':'^ ;Ili<»!l a/: {tys^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) No. c^/-tv /200t ff^ PETITIONER : ^uresh KumarDansena S/o. Shri N.L.Dansena \r '/•"'^?'".. Aged about 38 years \<>/'^J:--' ...••' . .< \ V- ^^z- v'yy .0, /.y »<•••' .••" \y ^ Post-Assistant Teacher R/o. Village -Singhitarai, Tahsil Dabhra & District Janjgir-Champa (C.G,) V^RSLLS RESPONDENTS :1. State ofChhattisgarh ^ .0^ v ^p^^ /^y ^^ /' 3. WRIT PETITION Through : Secretary Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Janjgir, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) Block Education Officer Block-Dabhra Distript-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) / U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS HI6H COUftT OF CHHATTESfiARH AT EELASPUR W. P. (5)No. 940 of 2007 Petitioner : Suresh Kumtu' Dansena Versus Respondents State of Chhatt-isgou-h A others Single Banch: Hon'ble Mr. JusticeSatish K. Agnihotri. Mr. Anil Mnirya, Advocate for Ihe Petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jam, Pcnel Lcuwyer for the State/reqxmdents. ORDER (Passed on tiiis 20th &ay of Februory, 2007) 1. Leamed counset eppearing for the petitioner submits -that the petitioner is working as Assiytwit Teacher in the fiovemment Primary School, Fulbashi, Block Dabhru, Distriet' Jan^gir-Champa. The petitioner has obtamed B.T.I. Examination certificate in the yenr 1995, on his own expenses. 2. Leamed counset appearing for 'the petitioner submits that the question involved, herein asto whether the teacher, who obtouned B.TJ. Examination Cert'ificate on h(S own expenses, is entitted to two advonce increments. 3. According to leamed counsel for the petitioner, the petitiwwr is entitled to two advcnce increments in vha» of the decision of •this Court in tiie case of Vashwant Kunwr Bharudwty Vs. Municipol Corpomtjon. Durg and anothw {2006 03) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court in the case of Yadiwant Kumar Hiaradwaj Vs. Municpal Corporation, Subhash burg and another (Supro), came to the conchision that -the teachers, who had obtamed B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examination Certificute on •their own expenses, are covered by Ifte circular dated 24.12.98 issued by Ihe State Govemment of Madhya Pradesh. • 4. Leamed counsel for the petitioner furt+ier submits that •ftie facts and question of law involved in -the present case are squarely covered by decision of Ihis Court in -the case of yariiwarrt' Kumar Bhdnadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporution. t)urg and another (&ipro), to which leamed counsel appearing for the respondents fairly concedes and agrees with the averment mcide by fearned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 5. Accordingly. the writ petition is allowed in termsof the order passed in -ttie cose of yashwant Kumar Bharodtwy Vs. Munic4>al Corporatjon. Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether •the petitioner has acquired B.TJ. Examination Cert'ificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid -two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- SarishK. Agnihotn Judge