IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 24TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 2ND ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 15699 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- AISHABEEVI, AGED 60 YEARS W/O.LATE ABDUL JAFFER, SALAVUDEEN MANZIL EZHUPURAM, ELAMKULAM, KOTTAKKAKATHU CHERI P.O.PARIPALLI,KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAVEENDRAN PILLAI SMT. INDIRA RAVEENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KERALA AGRICULTURAL RELIEF COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY WORLD MARKET CENTRE, ANAYORA PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY ,POOTHAKULAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, POOTHAKULAM PO, KOLLAM. ADV. SRI.V.G.ARUN FOR R2 SRI. K.S. MOHAMMED HASHIM, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 15699 of 2009 APPENDIX Petitioners Exhibits: Ext.P1: True copy of the receipt of Rs.20,000/- on 08.03.2006 Ext.P1(a): True copy of the receipt Rs.50,000/- on 24.5.2006 Ext.P1(b): True copy of the receipt Rs.37047/- on 30.10.2007 Ext.P1(d): True copy of the receipt Rs.25,000/- on 30.10.2007 Ext.P2: True copy of the certificate issued by the Orthopedic Surgeon Taluk Head Quarters Hospital dt.20.5.2009 Ext.P3: True copy of the plain submitted by the 2nd respondent before the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Society. Ext.P4: True copy of the application submitted by the petitioner before the 1st respondent. Ext.P5: True copy of the award passed by the Assistant Registrar of Co- operative Society Kollam dt.14.5.2009 Ext.P6: True copy of the receipt showing payment of Rs.80,000/- (Rupees Eighty Thousand only) by the petitioner dt.22.5.2009 Ext.P7: True copy of the representation submitted by the petitioner dt.27.5.2009 /True copy/ P.A. To Judge S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (C) No. 15699 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 24th day of September, 2009 J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed challenging recovery proceedings for recovery of loan amount taken by the petitioner from the second respondent bank. Learned counsel for the 2nd respondent submitted on 8.9.2009 that petitioner has closed the loan account. On that day the petitioner sought time to verify the same. Today the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the counsel has not received any instruction from the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of recording the submission of the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent. (S. SIRI JAGAN , JUDGE) jma