IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7117 of 2010 RAMA SHANKAR SINGH @ RAMA SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 09.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence is of allegations against 15 to 20 unknown under Section 396 of the Penal Code is that the only material noticed in paragraph-5 of the impugned order is the confession of a co-accused. Considering the materials in paragraph-6 of the impugned order, the F.I.R. being of 2000, attachment against him being ordered on 31.7.2001, antecedent of six heinous cases and custody since 8.10.2009, no T.I.P. or recovery, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 30,000/- (Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri A.K. Dixit, J.M., Ist Class, Siwan in connection with Barhariya P.S. Case No. 40 of 2000, Trial No. 1493 of 2009. Both the sureties must be from his own village with landed property in the village and whose photograph and proof of residence along with details of the properties shall be appended to the bail bonds. In the event of his failure to be represented 2 properly on a single date of failure to appear on the date fixed for his appearance by the court below, the court below shall be at liberty to deal with him appropriately quite apart from the sureties, as the circumstances may so warrant, so that the progress of the trial is not hindered. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)