IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1932 MACA.No. 2347 of 2010() ----------------------------------- (OP(MV).336/2006 of MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, IRINJALAKUDA) .................... APPELLANT(S): PETITIONER ----------------------------------------- GOPALAN, S/O.KUNNAPPAN, THOTTEPARAMBAN HOUSE, POTTA DESOM AND P.O., NEAR PANAMPILLY COLLEGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.P.V.BABY SRI.A.N.SANTHOSH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. RAJAN CHACKO, PEEDIYAKKAL PARAYIL HOUSE, VALLANCHIRA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680562. BY THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = M.A.C.A. NO. 2347 OF 2010 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 24th day of November, 2010. J U D G M E N T This appeal is preferred against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Irinjalakuda in O.P. (MV)836/06. The claimant sustained injuries in a road accident and the Tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs.30,300/- against the claim of Rs.76,000/- and it is against that decision the claimant has come up in appeal for enhancement. 2. Heard. The injury sustained are a lacerated wound on the leg and a fracture on the left clavicle. There is no disability for the petitioner though a sonography was taken. Further there is no disability certificate produced in this case. The Tribunal has awarded a reasonable compensation under all heads and provided Rs.4,000/- towards loss of amenities and Rs.10,000/- towards pain and sufferings. He was an M.A.C.A. 2347 OF 2010 -:2:- inpatient for 10 days in the hospital and adequate compensation is awarded for bystanders as well as medical expenses. So considering the entire materials it can be seen that the Tribunal has awarded a just and reasonable compensation and therefore the appeal does not deserve consideration on merits and the appeal is dismissed. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-