IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24343 of 2010 BALMIKI PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.07.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 02.11.2009 in connection with a case registered under Sections 302/34 and 201 of the I.P.C. The petitioner’s involvement surfaced on the confessions of the petitioner and one Ranju Devi. Though the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. V, has referred in the impugned order that there are material evidence against the petitioner in the case diary but surprisingly no material has been referred. However, the other two accused persons, namely, Arjun Mahto and Ranjeet Paswan, whose names also surfaced on the confession of Ranju Devi have been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 8014 of 2010 and 8881 of 2010,let the petitioner, Balmiki Paswan, be released on bail 2 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. V, Begusarai in Sessions Trial No. 294 of 2010 arising out of Muffasil(Begusarai) P.S. Case No.382 of 2009. The learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if he fails to appear on three consecutive dates during trial. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)