IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10146 of 2010 1. MD.SAKIR 2. Abdul Bashir 3. Md. Akhtar Hussain @ Akhtar Husain 4. Mukhtar Alam 5. Amir Hussain Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 26.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the main allegation of the deceased was that co-accused Hassibur Rahman son of petitioner no.5 and brother of rest of the petitioners took the deceased in the midnight, thereafter both of them disappeared and petitioners only have been alleged in the case due to their being father and brothers. Marriage, if any, would solemnize, was due to Hasibur Rahman’s having illicit relationship with the deceased and petitioners have no concern with the part of that affair including disappearing Hasibur Rahman with the deceased. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Pranpur P.S. Case No. 97 of 2009 , above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial - 2 - Magistrate, Katihar, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. ( Mandhata Singh, J ) BTiwary/