IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13365 of 2011 Ashok Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. This is second round of litigation by the petitioner. Earlier writ petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation against his termination, which was done long ago. Ultimately, the petitioner filed a representation, which was rejected in September, 2009. The petitioner has now approached this court after two years to impugn his termination. The petitioner is a Guest Teacher. As per the detailed order passed in response to representation filed by the petitioner, it is noticed that the petitioner was appointed just by displaying the vacancy on the notice board and the post was not advertised. It is accordingly observed that the appointment of the petitioner was made by Principal in violation of the rules. I do not see any reason to interfere in this order at this belated stage, notwithstanding the pleas raised by the petitioner that he is suffering from some disease and has a liability towards handicapped children. Dismissed. July 28, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE