THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1199 OF 2009 19TH AUGUST, 2009 BETWEEN: PITHANI SATYA SREENIVASA NARASIMHA RAO .. PETITIONER V STATE OF A.P. .. RESPONDENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1199 OF 2009 O R D E R: This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order dated 15th July, 2009 passed in Crl.M.P.No.22 of 2009 in S.C.No.328 of 2005 on the file of Assistant Sessions Judge, Kothapeta, East Godavari District, whereby and where under the learned Assistant Sessions Judge allowed the application filed by the prosecution u/s 231 of Cr.P.C. 2. The petitioner is accused in S.C.No.328 of 2005. He is being prosecuted for the offences under sections 363, 366-A and 376 IPC. The prosecution filed application under section 231 of Cr.P.C to receive the following documents: 1) Original Birth Certificate of female child of Sreepada Satyanarayana and Kameswar (LWs.1 and 2) bearing registration No.1990-08-93185. 2) Private complaint failed by Sreepada Satyanarayana in the court of the Hon’ble Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kothapeta (certified copy). 3) Original Hall ticket of Sreepada Naga Divya Lakshmi Sirisha bearing No.0262987. The learned Assistant Sessions Judge allowed the application by an order dated 15th July, 2009. Assailing the said order the petitioner/accused has filed this revision. 3. When this revision came up for admission, with the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is taken up for final disposal. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that receiving the documents, at this stage, causes serious prejudice to the petitioner/accused and therefore the application filed by the prosecution is liable to be dismissed. 6. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor supported the order impugned in the revision. 7. The prosecution filed the application on the date scheduled for examination of L.Ws.1 to 3 to receive the documents referred to supra. What is prayed in the application is only receiving of the documents. The petitioner/accused has got every right to raise objection with regard to marking of the documents when they are tendered through any of the prosecution witnesses. The prosecution explained the circumstances in the application for not filing the documents along with the charge sheet. Therefore, I do not see any flaw in the order impugned in this revision. 8. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed at the admission stage. 19th August, 2009. ( B.Seshasayana Reddy,J ) tnb THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1199 OF 2009 19th August, 2009.