V") © presen...-^•^T^l ^^•-••"\)\ry\ t^1 1 HON'BLES.B. IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) No.3T(4^- / 2011 PETITtONERS; RESPONDENTS: 2: Amrit Prasad Markam, S/o Lafe Shri Ramfal Markam, Aged about 49 years, Post- Vaccinator, R/o Government Poultry Farmy Koni, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, C.G. Amar Pratap Singh, S/o S.hri Yamuna Singh, Aged about 43 years, Post- Vaccinator, R/o Jabadapara, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, C.G. VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisg'arh, Through the Secretary, Veterinary Department, Ministry, D.K.S. Building, Raipur, C:G. 2. ^The Director, Department ofVeterinary Services, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. WRIT IPETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 0!= THE CONSTITUTION OF :IND1A 1 ••'•5. r," *<T*(?IT ^iirai 75f -<ii<ii<yi'i<, axilyito, fsidi'ylj>< ..U..(?-..C!>..5.0-.-..A.lf1. 3II^?T'CT^T (' sn^i ^n R-ii'* ^aff 3?T^T ai^iq-i TRireT ^fCT 3tI^?I ^f-4td4h iTlt^ff tf fs^ Tf^R^K ^sffman^r *d6VA_.§ Shri Aiok Dewangan, cou^ Shri A.V.Shridhar, P.L. foij The petitioners who are sel for the petitioners. the State. working as Vaccinator on regular basis in the department of Veter^naiy Seryices have filed this petition stating that the State ot' Ma^ihya Pradesh has granted yeaj-ly increinents from the date of r^gularization to the siinilarly placed persons and the same benefits s bould also have been extended to the petitioners. Counsel for the petitioner^ submits that at this stage, he may be permitted to withdraw this pe{ to the respondents for decidinj the petitioners, State counsel submits thc take independent decision an; by the petitioners, the same ma^j It is madedlear thaf this on merits of the case and the au| tition. However a direetion be issued |:he pending representations fiied by .t the State of Ghhattisearh is free to i it oannot be compelled by the petitioners simply because one 4ecision has been taken by the State of MadhyaPradesh. He further a fresh representation and the c( same in aocordance with iaw. Accordingly, the petition aforesaid liberty. In the eventua(ity of filing any such representation ubmits that let the petitioners make incemed authority may consider the s dismissed as withdrawn with the be decided in accordance with law. 3ourt has not expressed any opimon hority concemed would be at liberty to decide the representation so i^iade in accordance v/ith law, pritto^ ludge