IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 6516 of 2010. Decided on 21.3.2011 Dr. Dharun Pal Singh ..…Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh. …. Respondent. _____________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General. V.K. Sharma, Judge (Oral) The petition has been filed on the following prayers vide para 14 (a) and (b) : “ (a) to issue a writ of certiorari or direction in nature thereof, quashing the impugned order dated 14.10.2010 being Annexure P-2 of the writ petition, as unconstitutional and illegal and contrary to the law. (b) to issue a writ of mandamus, appropriate writ, order or direction in nature thereof, directing the respondent to allow the petitioner to complete normal tenure of 3 to 5 years at present place of posting.” 2. There is no reply as yet. However, with the consent of parties, the petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent that subject to the petitioner making a representation along with a copy of this judgment within one month from today, the same shall be considered and decided by the said respondent within another month in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, if so, desired. Interim order dated 19.10.2010 shall continue till final disposal of the representation. 4. The petition stands disposed of, so also pending CMP (s), if any. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 (V.K. Sharma) Judge 21st March, 2011. cs