1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9289 OF 2007 Pranita @ Hemangi Pratap Gavaskar .. Petitioner Versus Krishna Vasudeo Nadkarni & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.Khandeparkar i/b. Khandeparkar & Associates for petitioner CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 18th December 2007 P.C. . Heard Mr.Khandeparkar for petitioner and perused the impugned judgement. 2 2. Insofar as Survey No.96/1/2 the petitioner plaintiff apart from producing the sale deed could not establish her physical possession. The trial court as also the lower appellate court concurrently found that at this prima facie stage in respect of other lands, though the petitioner plaintiff has proved possession insofar as this land is concerned, her physical possession has not been established. Silence on the part of the petitioner plaintiff and the fact that she could not produce any documents to show that the lands were under cultivation by her or that under her authority and control the trees were planted and fruits grown, refusal of the courts below to protect the petitioner insofar as this survey number is concerned, cannot be faulted. Petition dismissed. 3 (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)