IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO. 67 OF 2011 In the matter of the Companies Act,1956; AND In the matter of Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956; AND In the matter of Composite Scheme of Amalgamation involving: i. Amalgamation of Ensen Holdings Limited with PIL Chemicals Private Limited. ii. Amalgamation of Urvija Investments Limited with PIL Chemicals Private Limited. All the said Companies having their Registered Office at Mafatlal House, H. T. Parekh Marg, Backbay Reclamation, Mumbai -400 020. Ensen Holdings Limited ) a company incorporated under the ) provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, ) having its Registered Office at Mafatlal ) House, H. T. Parekh Marg, Backbay ) Reclamation, Mumbai -400 020. ) …… Applicants 2 Called Summons for Direction Coram: S. C. Dharmadhikari. J. Date: 28th January, 2011 Mr. Rohaan Cama i/b Vigil Juris, Advocates for the Applicants MINUTES OF THE ORDER UPON the Application of the Applicant abovenamed by a Summons for Direction AND UPON hearing Mr. Rohaan Cama i/b Vigil Juris, Advocates for the Applicant and UPON reading the Affidavit dated 7th December, 2010 of MR. P. Srinivasan, Director of the Applicant Company in Support of Summons for Direction, and the Exhibits therein referred to, IT IS ORDERED :- 1. That the convening and holding the meeting of the Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Company, for the purpose of considering, and if thought fit, approving, with or without modification, the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation involving (i) Amalgamation of Ensen Holdings Limited with PIL Chemicals Private Limited and (ii) Amalgamation of Urvija Investments Limited with PIL Chemicals Private Limited, is dispensed with, in view of the 3 consents given by all the Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Company, which are annexed as Exhibits “G” to “J” to the Affidavit in Support of Summons for Direction. 2. There are no Secured and Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Company as stated in paragraph 23 of the Affidavit in Support of Summons for Direction. Hence, the question of convening and holding the meeting of Secured and Unsecured Creditors does not arise. (S. C. Dharmadhikari. J.)