IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.289 of 2009 Jagannath Sah @ Jagarnath Sah, son of late Anand Lal Sah, resident of Village- Bishunpur Baghnagri, P.O. Bishunpur Baghnagri, P.S. Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur. …..Plaintiff…..Petitioner. Versus 1. Shankar Sah. 2. Shivaji Sah. 3. Nand Kishore Sah. 4. Nawal Kishore Sah. 5. Kaushal Kishore Sah. All sons of late Daroga Sah. 6. Munna Sah, son of Jai Kishore Sah. 7. Tulu Kumar Sah, son of Kamal Kishore Sah. 8. Sonu Sah, son of Kamal Kishore Sah. 9. Rajendra Sah, son of late Tipu Sah 10. Raghubir Sah, son of late Tipu Sah. All resident of village- Bishunpur Baghnagri, P.O. Bishunpur Baghnagri, P.S. Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur. ….Defendant…Opposite 1st parties. 11. Arpan Sah, 12. Dinesh Sah 13. Shiv Prakash Sah 14. Bitu Sah All sons of Janki Sah. All residents of Village- Bishunpur Baghnagri, P.O.- Bishunpur Baghnagri, P.S.- Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur. ….Defendant…Opp.Parties 2nd Parties. 15. Deve Narain Sah, son of late Fulchan Sah, 16. Sunil Kumar Mishra 17. Most. Mandari Devi, widow of late Lal Narain Mishra. 18. Raghunath Sah, son of late Anand Lal Sah, All are residents of village- Bishunpur Baghnagri, P.O. Bishunpur Baghnagri, P.S. Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur. 19. Yugal Sah 20. Umesh Sah 21. Anil Sah 22. Mukesh Sah 23. Yogesh Sah 2 All sons of late Baidyanath Sah, resident of Village- Bishunpur Baghnagri, P.O. Bishunpur Baghnagri, P.S. Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur. …Plaintiff…Opp. Parties 4th Parties. ----------- 11- 16.11.2011 Heard Mr. Hari Kishore Thakur for the petitioner. This application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by the plaintiff of Partition Suit No.509 of 2003, and raises a grievance with respect to the order dated 19.12.2008, passed by the learned Subordinate Judge 5th court, Muzaffarpur, whereby he has ordered for appointment of Survey Knowing Pleader Commissioner because learned trial court is of the view that, it is essential for adjudication of the issues involved in the suit. I am, therefore, of the view that it will not be appropriate to interfere with the same. Law is well settled that Pleader Commissioner’s report is only a piece of evidence subject to objections of the parties to the suit, and subject to judicial scrutiny. This civil revision application is dismissed. The suit is of the year 2003 and may, therefore, be disposed of expeditiously. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/