IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16916 of 2009 1. MUNSHI GUPTA S/O LATE RAJA RAM GUPTA R/O VILL.- AATDIH, P.S.- RAMGARH, DISTT.- KAIMUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION BIHAR, PATNA VIKASH BHAWAN, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 3. THE SECRETARY PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KAIMUR 5. DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER KAIMUR 6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION KAIMUR 7. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER MOHANIA, P.S.- MOHANIA, DISTT.- KAIMUR 8. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER RAMGARH, P.S.- RAMGARH, DISTT.- KAIMUR 9. THE SECRETARY VIDAYALAYS SHIKSHA SAMITI, PRIMARY SCHOOL, AATDIH, DISTT.- KAIMUR 10. ANCHAL ADHIKARI RAMGARH, P.S.- RAMGARH, DISTT.- KAIMUR 11. SRI JOKHAN RAM, PRINCIPAL PRIMARY SCHOOL, AATDIH, DISTT.- KAIMUR, ABHIKARTA OF THE SCHEME ----------- 2/ 10/12/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is stated to have already represented more than once before the District Magistrate with regard to the erection of a boundary wall and that the plot on which it is sought to be constructed stands on the residential house of the petitioner since long over 50 years. Let the District Magistrate consider the representation of the petitioner and dispose it off by a reasoned and speaking order preferably within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/presentation of a copy of this order. - 2 - While dealing with any such representation, it is expected that the District Magistrate shall adequately consider the stand of the petitioner that his residential house stands on the land which he apprehends to lose. The writ application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)