IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22406 of 2008 BABLOO YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 21.7.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that this petitioner is not named in the first information report nor was put on test identification parade. He has been implicated in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-Accused. The other co-accused having similar accusation have already been granted bail by the lower court which is apparent from the impugned order. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely, Babloo Yadav is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in Forbesganj P.S.case No.167 of 2002. B.Jha (Ghanshyam Prasad)