IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP NO.4266 OF 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 19.3.2009 Dr.Y.C.Markan ...Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab & Others …Respondents CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI PRESENT: Mr.N.S.Jagdeva, Advocate for the petitioner Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) The petitioner has challenged the charge-sheet (Annexure P-1) served upon him. Reply to the charge-sheet has already been filed. It is contended that the charge-sheet is on account of mala fide of respondent no.3. The other contention is that the petitioner has not violated any order of higher authority. The main charge against the petitioner is that he has retained one Jiwan Lal, Junior Assistant even after his transfer without the approval of the higher authorities, including the authorities who transferred the said Jiwan Lal. These are the matters which require to be considered by the disciplinary authority and at this stage it is not prudent to interfere in the matter. This petition is premature. Dismissed. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 19.3.2009 MFK