IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14780 of 2009 1. RAVI SHANKAR THAKUR S/O SRI JAWAHAR LAL THAKUR R/O VILL.- DEOKULI, P.O. DEOKULI, P.S. BRAHAMPUR, DISTT.- BUXAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPTT. GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE COLLECTOR BUXAR 3. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BRAHAMPUR BUXAR 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION SUPERINTENDENT BUXAR 5. THE MUKHIYA GAHAUNA GRAM PANCHAYAT AT DEOKULI P.S. BRAHAMPUR, DISTT.- BUXAR 6. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GAHAUNA GRAM PANCHAYAT DEOKULI, P.S. BRAHAMPUR, DISTT.- BUXAR 7. MANOJ KUMAR S/O GULAB CHAND PRASAD R/O VILL.- BRAHAMPUR, HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, P.O. BRAHAMPUR, P.S. BRAHAMPUR, DISTT.- BUXAR ----------- 3. 22.02.2010 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the state. This writ application has been filed by the petitioner for reviewing the order dated 11.9.2009 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 8579 of 2008. By order dated 11.9.2009, several writ applications including C.W.J.C. No. 8579 of 2008 have been allowed and the impugned orders whereby petitioners in each writ application were terminated, was quashed with a direction to reinstate them. Petitioner’s case is that the impugned order which was quashed in C.W.J.C. No. 8579 of 2009 and analogous writ applications was in fact passed at his instance, he was not made a party, as such he is entitled for filing of this writ application for review of the order. - 2 - On perusal of the documents, I find that this is a matter in which the petitioner should approach the appellate tribunal. The concerned appellate tribunal will have an opportunity to look into the connected records of Teachers’ Employment in the year, 2006. Then he can decide whether Ravi Shankar Prasad, the petitioner in present writ application or Manoj Kumar, petitioner in C.W.J.C. No. 8579 of 2008 should have been appointed. This writ application is disposed of. Akv/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)