IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.F.A. No. 3955 of 2010 (O&M) Murti and others .... Appellants vs. State of Haryana and others .... Respondents Coram : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Alok Jain, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Advocate, for the HSIDC. RAJESH BINDAL, J The landowners have filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly the facts are that vide notification dated 10.9.1992 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') the State of Haryana acquired land in the revenue estate of village Rudh, Tehsil Bawal, District Rewari for setting up of Growth Centre at Bawal by HSIDC. The same was followed by notification dated 3.9.1993 issued under Section 6 of the Act. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, 'the Collector') awarded compensation @ ` 90,000/- per acre for chahi, ` 1,40,000/- per acre for gair mumkin and ` 2,00,000/- per acre upto the depth of two acres on both sides of NH No. 8. The reference filed by the landowners was allowed by the learned court below and they were awarded compensation @ ` 4,00,000/- per acre for all types of land upto the depth of two acres on both sides of NH No. 8 and ` 3,00,000/- per acre for the the remaining land. Aggrieved against the award of learned Court below, the landowners are before this Court. Learned counsel for the parties submitted that the issues raised in the present appeal are squarely covered by judgment of this court in RFA No. 3323 of 2005 – Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation and another vs Gindori and others, decided on 23.8.2010. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of in terms of aforesaid judgment. 22.9.2010. (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge