1 D.B. Criminal (Parole) Writ Petition No.4861/2006 Rahim Khan. vs. Union of India. Date : 22.2.2008 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. HON'BLE MR. BHANWAROO KHAN, J. Mr.AK Sindhi, for the petitioner. Mr.Durga Ram for Mr.KS Nahar, Special PP. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of the fact mentioned in the reply filed by the respondents, that the petitioner earlier faced the trial in TADA Act and he absconded in that case, however, as per learned counsel for the petitioner, he was acquitted in that case. The petitioner was convicted under the NDPS Act and 13 kgs. of heroin was recovered from his possession. In view of the above, we are not inclined to give any direction to the State for consideration of his case for release on parole. At this juncture, it will be relevant to mention here that in rejoinder to the reply filed by the State, 2 the petitioner stated that the petitioner's brother is also in jail undergoing sentence. Consequently, this parole petition, having no merits, is hereby dismissed. (BHANWAROO KHAN), J. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya