- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.445 OF FROM ORDER NO.445 OF FROM ORDER NO.445 OF 2005 2005 2005 Ganesh Vithal Gaikwad ...Appellant vs. Mumbai Housing & Area Development Board ...Respondent CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : APRIL 19,2005. : APRIL 19,2005. : APRIL 19,2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned Counsel for the Appellant states that the order dated 11th February 2005 is an appealable order. The learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks permission to withdraw this Appeal with liberty to prefer an Appeal for challenging the order dated 11th February 2005. The learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the parties may be directed to maintain status quo to enable the Appellant to avail of the remedy of the Appeal. The request made by the learned Counsel for the Appellant is reasonable. 2. Hence, Appeal from Order is dismissed as withdrawn. The dismissal of the Appeal will not preclude the Appellant from challenging the order dated 11th February 2005 by filing appropriate proceedings. To enable the Appellant to prefer appropriate proceedings, parties will maintain status quo as of today for a period of two weeks. No order as to costs. JUDGE. JUDGE. JUDGE.