IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 11TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 20TH KARTHIKA 1932 RP.No. 942 of 2010(U) -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.28564/2010 DATED 16/09/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/3RD RESPONDENT ----------------------------------------------------------- P. MOHANKUMAR, LAKSHMI SADANAM, NADAYIL THEKKETHIL THARAYIL, KOIPPALLIKKARAMA, MAVELIKKARA, PIN-690 101. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE(PERUMPALLIKUTTIYIL), SRI.A.R.DILEEP, SRI.V.SUNIL KUMAR (PANACHAMOODU), SRI.H.JAWHAR. RESPONDENTS/WRIT PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. S. BALAKRISHNA KURUP @ BALAN PILLAI, AGED 75, S/O.SUKUMARAN NAIR, KAVICHANETH HOUSE, SUKU BHAVANAM, KOIPALLI KARAZMA, OLAKETTIYAMBALAM, MAVELIKARA, PIN-690 510. 2. TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, MAVELIKARA, PIN-690 101. 3. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PWD-ROADS SECTION, MAVELIKARA, PIN-690 101. R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.C.JOHN. R2 & R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.DILEEP MOHAN. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ R.P.No.942 OF 2010 IN W.P.(C) NO. 28564 OF 2010 (U) ======================= Dated this the 11th day of November, 2010 O R D E R Heard both sides. 2. It is now informed that pursuant to the directions in Ext.P3 judgment, the Tahsildar has issued Annexure V order and the writ petitioner has already filed his statutory appeal against the said order passed under the provisions of the Kerala Land Conservancy Act. In that view of the matter, further proceedings pursuant to Exts.P4 and P6 are of no consequence. Therefore, leaving it open to the parties to pursue their remedies against Annexure V order passed by the Tahsildar and directing that the judgment will stand modified to that extent, the review petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp