IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17025 of 2011 Mukesh Sahni son of Jagdish Sahni Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Rinku Devi wife of Mukesh Sahni ----------- 4. 28.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. No counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the informant opposite party No. 2 inspite of earlier order and opportunity granted. Petitioner is one of the named accused in this case being husband of the informant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. Submission is that petitioner intends to resume and continue matrimonial relationship with the informant who is his solitary and newly wedded wife but under some confusion left the company of petitioner, but has filed an application under Section 125 Cr. P.C. bearing case No. 150 of 2011 before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur, wherein till date no order is passed. However, in order to further strengthen his intention offers to pay a sum of Rs. 500/-(five hundred) per month to the informant by way of interim maintenance subject to any order of the 2 competent court on the point. Considering facts and circumstances, on the event of filing an application before the Court below stating such intentions as stated above and begin with the payment, in the event of his arrest/ surrender before the Court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Katra, P.S. Case No. 180 of 2010, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the Court below on each and every date at least for two years of till disposal of the case, whichever, is earlier, in case of failure on four consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, or even on single defect in payment the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Saif/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)