IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 8286/2008 Decided on:29.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Padam Singh. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for respondents No. 1 and 2. Respondents No.3,5,6 & 8 already ex parte. None for respondents No. 4 and 7. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he has not been considered for promotion to the post of Centre Head Teacher. It has come in the reply filed by the respondents that the seniority of the petitioner has been dovetailed as he had been transferred from one district to other district. 2. Since the petitioner’s seniority has been dovetailed, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 29.12.2010*awasthi* 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?