IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2714 OF 2008 Smt.Noorjahan Wd/o.Haji Mohammed Sharif & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Shri Phool Chand Yadav & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.H.P.Pandey for Petitioners. None for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JULY 8, 2008. JULY 8, 2008. JULY 8, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. I see no reason to interfere with the view expressed by the Court below that in Suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, the core question, and perhaps the only question that has to be addressed is in the context of relief of restoration of possession of the Plaintiff, who has been unauthorisedly and illegally dispossessed. 2. If the Plaintiff intends to raise any : 2 : other issue including the factum of changing the nature of suit property inspite of order of injunction, the Plaintiff will be free to take recourse to such other remedy as may be advised, which will have to be decided on its own merits. 3. For the time being, suffice it to observe that no fault can be found with the discretionary order passed by the Court below in rejecting the application for amendment of the Plaint. Hence, dismissed. Sd/- A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.