IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 20TH JANUARY 2011 / 30TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 2059 of 2011(F) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. KUNHIPATHU @ FATHIMA, AGED 63 YEARS, W/O.T.K.ABDUL RAHIMAN, THEKKEKUNNIL, PALLIKARA BEACH, BEKAL FORT PO, KASARGODE DISTRICT. 2. NAAFIR, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.K.M.MOIDU, K.M.HOUSE, THRIKKANAD, BEKAL FORT PO, KASARGODE DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.JAWAHAR JOSE SMT.CISSY MATHEWS RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE TAHASILDAR, HOSDURG, KASARGODE DISTRICT-671 121. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PALLIKARA, KASARGODE DISTRICT-671 121. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/01/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 2059 of 2011 F ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 20th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T Ext.P4 is an application made by the petitioners to the first respondent for assignment of 3 cents of land situated in Re-survey No.386/3A of Pallikkara village, which is stated to be in their occupation. According to the petitioners, this application has been numbered as LA.4/2010/Pallikkara and proceedings are pending before the first respondent. It is stated that during the pendency of the said application, proceedings have been initiated against the petitioners for eviction from the aforesaid land and in that process, Ext.P2 notice has been issued by the first respondent. It is in these circumstances, the petitioners have filed this writ petition, seeking a direction to the first respondent to finalise the proceedings evidenced by Ext.P4 before proceeding further with Ext.P2. 2. Having regard to the fact that Ext.P4 application W.P.(C) No.2059/2011 : 2 : made by the petitioners for assignment of the land in question is pending before the first respondent, I feel fairness requires that Ext.P2 should be kept in abeyance until the aforesaid proceedings are finalised. 3. In that view of the matter, I dispose of this writ petition, directing that, on the production of a copy of this judgment, the first respondent will take further action on Ext.P4 and conclude the proceedings with notice to the petitioners. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within eight weeks thereafter. It is directed that, until orders are passed as above, all further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P2 will be kept in abeyance. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment and writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge