IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL A.O. No. 119 of 2009 Maqsood Ahamad …….. Appellant Versus Hari Singh …….. Respondent ………. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C. J. After hearing learned counsel for the appellant, I am convinced that the learned Court below has rightly rejected the appellant’s application for re-admission of the appeal because a perusal of the impugned order clearly suggests that, first and foremost, the appellant was grossly negligent in prosecuting the appeal and had taken as many as 20 adjournments and secondly, no good ground was made out for re-admission of the appeal. This appeal is dismissed in limine. (V. K. Gupta, C. J.) 21.04.2009 A