IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6390 of 2011 RUDRA NARAIN YADAV SON OF LATE BAJE YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-INARWA GOTH, P.O. LISRAHI, P.S. DEWDHA(JAYNAGAR), DISTRICT MADHUBANI …PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHUBANI 3. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF LAND REVENUE, JAYNAGAR, DISTRICT MADHUBANI 4. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, JAYNAGAR, MADHUBANI 5. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, DEODHA POLICE STATION, P.S. DEODHA(JAYNAGAR) MADHUBANI 6. VISHAMBER PURBEY SON OF LATE GANGAI PURBEY, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA BHELWA TOLA P.O. P.S. JAYNAGAR, MADHUBANI 7. RAJGIR YADAV SON OF LATE JUGESHWAR YADAV OF VILLAGE INARWA GOTH P.S. DEWDHA, JAYNAGAR …RESPONDENTS ----------- 02. 11.04.2011 Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioner claims to be privileged tenant under the Bihar Privileged Homestead Tenancy Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). Purcha(s) under the aforesaid Act in respect of three and odd dhurs of land appertaining to khata no.279 (new), khesra no.1271(new) of village Inarwa Goth, Anchal Jaynagar in the district of Madhubani was/were settled by Annexure-1. It is the stand of the petitioner that while constructing a road under the Mukhya Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna, part of the land measuring about two kathas are being encroached upon by respondents 6 and 7 who are the executing agents of the said road. The petitioner moved the Respondent- D.C.L.R. Jaynagar raising the aforesaid grievance which was treated as case no. 03/10-11 wherein by a communication dated 2 20.08.2010 (Annexure-8) report was called for from the Respondent-Anchal Adhikari, Jaynagar and till further consideration status quo in respect of the said land was directed to be maintained. It is the stand of the petitioner that the said matter is still pending before the said authority inasmuch as the petitioner had to again file a fresh application (Annexure-9) in the said proceeding. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if respondent no.3 be directed to dispose of the said proceeding in accordance with law within a reasonable time. Learned A.C. to G.P.II, in view of aforesaid stand taken by the petitioner, does not object. Having heard the parties and after going through the materials on record, this application is disposed of by the following order: Let the petitioner approach the Respondent- Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Jaynagar and file an application attaching therewith copy of the present order within three weeks whereafter the said authority shall dispose of the pending eviction case no. 03/10-11(Rudra Narain Yadav vs. Vishambhar Purvey & Ors.) in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within 05 weeks of its filing. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )