IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.7298 of 2009 RAM PRAVESH RAI son of late Brahmdeo Rai, resident of village- Santha, P.S. Awatar Nagar, District- Saran ….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, 2. Amerikan Rai son of Deepa Rai, 3. Manoj Rai son of Baij Nath Rai, 4. Ram Binod Rai son of Deepa Rai, 5. Baleshwar Rai son of Deepa Rai, & 6. Sinoj Rai son of Baij Nath Rai, Nos. 2 to 5 resident of village- Santha, P.S. Awatar Nagar, District- Saran …Opposite Parties ----------- 2/ 24.08.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved by rejection of his application filed under section 311 Cr. P. C. for examination of the doctor during trial by order dated 17.12.2008 passed in Sessions Trial No. 681 of 1993 by the FTC II, Saran. From the impugned order, I find that the trial court has considered that the prosecution had been granted many opportunities to examine the doctor despite which the doctor could not be examined and after the case was closed and it was fixed for defence evidence belatedly an application under section 311 Cr. P. C. was filed by the informant evidently with intention to further delay the matter. In view of such, this application is dismissed. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)