b^ P.R.NO.... presWte<tb'<tw^-)^A, flated..." ^^.........^ c^^ (- 4- ( 's-o 1^!5^^! BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH @.L.&^'^i <-s^ ATBILASPUR mTHERIATTER OF '^<t/C("^ W.pfNO. /Q7 ^^8^y) .VINAY KUMAR GUPTA, AGE- 37 YEAR S/0 LATE KAPIL PRASAD GUPTA R/0 TAPKARA DIST. - JASHPUR VERSUS MOH NOORE HAQUE S/0 SHRI ABDUL HAQUE R/0 KHARSIYA NAKA AMBIKAPUR '2. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHQRITY RAIPUR /3. SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BILASPUR 4. STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAIPUR PETITIONER ftjip^Cn.'lYl- .. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 326)^OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRJT m THE NATURE OF .MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI AND ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION AS DEEMED FIT // AAo..-l^~——I —' ' • — 1 •s'^l--^. HlGj-f_CgURT_OF CHHAmSGARH : BU-ASPUR WRIT PETITION (C)NO. 5787 of 2007 PETITIONER Vinay Kumar Gupta. RESPONDENTS Versus Moh Noore Haque & Others (Writ petition underArticle 227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- None for the petitioner. Shri S.K.Bajpai, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 29th day of September, 2010) The matter is called for 'hearing. None appears nor is any representation friade on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge !'";F: y:'^.