ou ‘2 r! -| m w§£§ 5%? “ Divisional F§re$t QEicerx Khah‘agarh, Tehséi Khaimgam maria: Eiaiaamgaen £Chhatii$garm EEETKE: 3E Ann Kumar $hukla, $I§§¢§r§ C‘ imam-arui Shukia, re$ident §f Naa: Badi Bamie$hwari Temme, Warci N0.§ ' {Dangargam D§sit Pyesid§ng Cfficesz Lamar Cam, Ramamgajm (Qhhatti§gayhy‘ ¥§§.&S}EQ‘ 3: w5?€§3 HEM iifiiwiéé QFvm ”(A Wu? A gf“. 35! H m E ;‘ 2? i mg HhQixE"! C$ié§QT m1" €$HHATT§§§§A¥KH AT $3Lé§$9i§i§ Man" Mr. Ju$tice Priti‘aktanr mwakaré W53 N6. 182 Qf 2092i 7 Shi’? petstmner$l$taie. Pankaj AgrawaL counsel foi’the regpsngren‘t I: ‘ Nc.1. ggnr’ a‘wwu. (2b.u!§.491“l§ The gresent petition has been fiteei by the State agains? the impL;gned award dated. 2?.072001 vide Annexure P-1 passéd by Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Distt. Rajnanégaon (CG) in'case No.183ILD. ActRef/QT’ whereby the Labew Calm has directed fog“ reinstatement of Anit Kumar Shukta an the post of Godown Keeper wtth 25 % af back wages; 2. Learned ceunsel fm’ &ppearing for reSpondent No.1 submtm that wbsequent to filing at“ this petition, Ami Kumar Shukia has airgady been regulatized as Pecm 0b 03(392008 (Annexure A}. Q Ori instruatiom, teamed counwi for responden Nat aubmits that re$po¥3cient N91 Wilt hat have any claim for baék wageis in future aisat 4V m View of above, amording to the counsei for the parties: nething survives in this petiticn for adjudicatibni 3 thus tne metn‘im r: accordingly di<posed 0f / gé‘ ’ «g‘e‘ t wazétmne: Divisiana! Forest Officar 2% another VERSU$ Rmpemwms Am! Kumar $§mkla & anether R2332“ Ci.“ P. Das, 3y GA. a: nsai the