IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF HHATTISGARH AlBILASPUR CMMINAL REVISION UNDER SECTION 19(4t OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984 CRIMINAL REVISION No. c^-3^ / 2006 LICANT/ r-APPLICANT <s.\. b^' .^ NON-APPLICANTS/ APPLICANTS ^€i .^^' >iy:•^•\ •^"" Narayan Kumbhakar, S/o. ilShri Shriram Kumbhakar, ' 'aged about 30 years, R/o. - Village Khhprikala, P.S. and Tahsil - Lormi District Bilaspur(C.G.) VERSUS 1) Smt. Ramayan Kumbhakar D/o. Shri Budalu Rani Prajapati, (Divorced wife of applicant), aged about 27 years, 2) Tushar Kumar, S/o. Narayan Kumbhakar, aged about 6 years, 'Minor' through Guardian inother Smt. Ramayan Kuinbhakar Both residents of Qr.No.C-77, Subhash Block, SECL, Korba, infront of NCDC School, Korba, Tahsil and District Korba (C.G.) CRIMINAL REVISION UNDER SECTION 19(4F" OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984 AGAINST THE QRDER DATED 23.3.2006^ASSED BY SHRt RAGHUVIR SINGH, FAMILY COURT, KORBA: DISTRICT KORBA (C.G.l IN MJC No.77/2005 ^- 53-HC-78 sn^r^iTR-iieb (T8IT 3iraT sPIR; 3^'^TFn^PT, »-rfl<1'l<B, Rldl+fy *^s~- *11HMI Sb*llth ^u. 233/G^^ 200 w^i w* (1?!^^) ?THTm;Eri?g'3TI^T 07-08-2C06 Shri M.K.Sinha. !earned Non-appSScants are |counsel for the applicant. abseht Heard on admission. This Cr'imina] Revisionl 23-03-2006 passed in M.J.i):. wherebv ths maintenanee of ivife (non-app'ieant No.l herein) app!ica:';t No.2 herein) from th4 Lecrned counse! for th< hcvs cbtained deeree of divorita :s tha* ths applicant is stil appiiccsnt nc.l herein. He maintsnsnes to tha son, the noit- Under expianation to "wife" incSudes a woman who diveree from, her" .husband maintain.the wife thus does nol In view of the above fadtual 'aarned counsel for the applicai|it, sean in the irr.pugnsd order datj ^rafefl'-r ITIIRTT'ifteiA rfwsrc ^iSTf^irsn^r te .^:1: is. directed against the order dated ;.No.77/2005 by Family Court, Korba ^s.TSQ/- per month was awarded to the and Rs.500/- per month to the son (non- date of order. applicant submits that the two spouses by mutual consent. His only contention rjeady and willing to keep the wife, non- ^oes not impugn the order granting ^-spplicant No.2. S|jb Section (4) of Section-125 of Crf.C. Ijias been divorced by, or has obtained a a(id has not remarried. The liability to come to an end till the wife remorries. situation and the submission made by ', no itle9ality or manifest error of law is d 23-03-2006. P.T.O. V- fei .!«£: XI-HC-78 3TT^T qiT [^.fich (WTSn^TshlI'O '^ 3ST 'lll^lcl'y, tiiTTly'Ko, Rl'tKrfy HIHWI 8»HTtft ^ 200 an^rqgg? (^cit^sK^) ¥RITWfl1?tT STI^T +l'i|ti-l4)-< WR?f fff^6^K^ ^srf^iran^T In the result, this Crin^inal Revision being devoid of merit is disrwsssd at the stage of admiss]ion. In view of the above, t^ie apptication M.Cr.P.No.765/2006 for grtB-rt of stay aiso stands dispos^d of. ,- ^ _, , l-/ Diiip Raosaheb Deshrat Judge ^ ^' ^ h