AT BILASPUR P0 R ar S m am Awat /0. Shri Rajkumar Ra, aged about 37 years, R/ o. Ramanujganj, P.S. Rmanujganj, Dist. Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT DIRECTION, ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH r w. R. IS) No. 433 12010 PETITIONER a RESPONDENTS / 1. State of Chhattisg'arh Through: The Secretary ......... .. Tribal welfare Depar‘tment,.D.K.S. \\w)“ ~ o V. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). «a? " '7‘ 1 \02 0’” \ /2. The Assistant Commissioneg‘, IL Q' 5x Q’ Tribal welfare Department Ambikapur Surguja, Surguja (C.G.) . WY. Vg‘ WvogJ/n WW m 200 summ (Wu) mmm mm wm *mm SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohar Shrivastava, J. 02-08-2010 Shri Bhupendra Singh, counse! forthe petitiuner‘ Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Léh‘wyer for the State/respondents on advance copy‘ Heard. Learned counse! appearing for the petitéoner submits that the petitioner is entitled to benem of two advance increments on account of he having passed B.TJ. examinati before his appointment at his own cost. it is submitted that the issue nvoived in the present petition is no ionger res integra and the same ha been finaiiy decided by the Hon’bie Supreme Court in the case of Ash Saxena vs. State of MP. & 01’s., 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59. it is furth r submitted that this Court has also taken a similar view in his o er dated 06-02-2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned ounsel for the petitioner further draws attention of this Court to order dat d 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal No.124 of 2009, wherein relying up n the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) nd the order passed by this Court in another Writ Appeal No.87/2009, directions have been issued for consideration of the case for gran of two advance increments as per circular dated 21-09-1 974 issued b the State of Madhya Pradesh, atter verification ofthe facts pleaded in th petition. Learned counsei for the re pondents submits that case of the petitioner would also be considered n the same lines. Q, ifE‘i'iiii'Fi A; LS ‘ 1 47‘2/20l0 —l ,00,000. x @ / ”v“ :gggiu‘Hc—m ‘ WKAQ.) mhbgliw WW m was (Wu) \ mwm ”Z In view of the statement made above, this petition i$ malty disposed of with a direction to the 'espondent authorities to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21-09-1 974 ISSL ed 11a zoo ’ WW WW *aifmm 4H Tumane by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of the facts pleaded in the petition within a period of eight weeks from today. 5 Manindra Judge ‘& Sd/— Mohan Shrivastava