[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION W.P.NO.1931 OF 2003 Clearfast Service Pvt.Ltd. ..Petitioner Vs. Department of Posts, India and Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.Tushar Bhavsar i/b Mohit Gadkari and Co. for Petitioner Mr.S.S.Pakale with Mr.Kiran Kandpile for Respondents ... CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : JULY 25, 2006 DATE : JULY 25, 2006 DATE : JULY 25, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Rule. Heard forthwith. We are surprised by the stand taken by the Respondents. Though they accepted money from the Petitioner, now they contend that the the Petitioner is not entitled to receive the money. We fail to see how the Respondents could have retained the money. Pursuant to the order of this Court, money has been deposited. Accordingly, money [-2-] to be paid in the hands of the Petitioner on Petitioner’s producing authenticated/certified copy of the order to the Prothonotary and Sr.Master. 2. With the above observation, petition stands disposed of. Prothonotary to act on the authenticated copy of this order. [ F.I.REBELLO, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]