IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WPPIL No.338 of 2008 Harbhajan Singh S/o Darshan Singh … Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & another … Respondents Sri Rahul Consul, Adv. i/b Sri Vipul Sharma, Adv. for the petitioner Sri L.P. Naithani, Advocate General for the State Sri Rakesh Thapliyal, Advocate for Respondent No.2 Coram Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. V.K. Gupta, C.J. (Oral) Looking to the prayers in the writ petition and the fact that during the pendency of this writ petition in this Court, the report by Respondent No.2-Commission has since been filed, we have no doubt in our minds that this writ petition has now been rendered infructuous. The writ petition is disposed of as having now become infructuous. (Dharam Veer, J.) (V.K.Gupta, C.J.) 25.09.2008 Rdang