IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14965 of 2011 Shivshankar Sah Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr with CWJC No.15107 of 2011 Ramnath Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr with CWJC No.15154 of 2011 Subhash Kumar Pandey @ Subhash Pandey Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr with CWJC No.15175 of 2011 Arjun Paswan Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr with CWJC No.15181 of 2011 Raj Nandan Sah Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.15183 of 2011 Ram Swarn Choudhary Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr with CWJC No.15191 of 2011 Zamshed Alam Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- 2/ 23.09.2011 The petitioners, who are licensee under the Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2001 pray for quashing the memo issued by the concerned authorities, directing refund of value of undistributed rice under 50 % and 30 % of Sampurna Gramin Rojgar Yojana in between the years 2002 to 2006 at APL rate (13.70 per kg). Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awash Prasad Singh Vs. The 2 State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would also govern in these writ applications as well. All the writ applications are accordingly disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioners would either deposit 20% of the value of undistributed rice at Rs.10 per Kg or the rice itself in present form within six weeks from today. This order would not come in the way of petitioners, if they want to deposit the value of rice or rice itself in excess of 20 %. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)