WW,WW,W wdgyuCg)."mlnxtogm...a 200% Wm (13W) (Writ Petition under Articie ‘227 of the Constitution of ndia) i ~ Singie Bench: Hon’bie Mr. Justice L.C. Bhadoo 9-1 -2008:- Heard Dr. Sanjeet Sharma, co .insei for the petitioner. \ WWW mmm WW§WW $affananéw PETITIONER: Rukmani Devi, Wd/o Late Shri Tulsi i=LAINTIFF Ram. aged ' about 60 years, By Caste Rajpoot, Occupation — Business, R/o Village — Jurgum, ijashpurnagar, Tahsii & Distt. - Jashpurnagar (C.G.) -Versus- ESPONDENTS: 1. , Smt. Kamla Devi, Wd/o Late EFENDANTS Sherbahadur Singh, aged about 60 years. 2. \ Narayan Singh, S/o Late Sherbahadur Singh, aged about 4O years. 3. Jagarnath Singh, S/o Late Sherbahadur Singh, aged‘about 3O years. 4. Ashok Singh, S/o Late Sherbahadur Singh, aged about 27 years. 5. Santosh Singh, S/o Late Sherbahadur Singh, aged about 25 years. r AII are residents of Ward No.10; Jashpumagar, Tahsii & Distt. — Jashpurnagar (C.G.) Wm (W) Wm a 2am anwmm MW mwm WWW WWK €5a'mm Bawe The petitioner, who is pieintiff before the Court beiow i.e. Civii Judge, Ciass 2, Jashpurnagar, has preferred this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of india, questioni legaiity and correctness of the order dated 17-8-2007 passed by teamed vil Judge whereby application tiled by the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 1 (3) of the CPC has been rejected, as also the order dated 29-9-2007 wherein I arned Civii Judge has heid that the petitioner has annexed documents along th affidavit filed under Order 18 Rule 4 CPC in the form of evidence and the insisted for tendering those doeuments into evidence, those documentsw not filed earlier with the plaint, neither any application has been filed by the plaintiff for taking those documents on record without which documents cann t be tendered into evidence. Similarly, vide order dated 17-8-2007, learned Civil Judge rejected the application holding that the documents which plain iff proposes to be taken on record were not relevant for the case that is why pplication has been rejected. As far as order dated 1 2007 is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able t nt out how those documents are relevant in the suit because those docume relate to the proceeding which was initiated by Municipal Corporation, Jash ur for taking copies of the Register of Births and Deaths, therefore, in pass the orders dated 17-8-2007 and 29-9-2007 subordinate Court has not com itted any illegality or intirmity & has also not committed any jurisdictional err . ln the result, the petition ng devoid of merit, is liable to be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed at the dmission stage itself. / Consequently, l.A. No.1 s nds disposed of. n i i e 7 - i n o i o i