^pyffB ^ Rr'ftiPM in; r IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURCC.G.) WRIT PETITION NO.^-V^4 /2005 PETITIONER 3^ ^v' ^ ^\',^^^,^ <§iF" ^:-s' \ ^*-' ^;'''.-C:^\^-N"' >^^"y ^^' ..•' ^SPONDENTS .,<..'^ ts^'^'.dS- o.^s "' Niranjan Singh Porte Son of Shri Mangal Singh, aged about 40 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-3, Prinhary . ScHool i ^, Churabahra, Tahjsil Marwahi, DJl^trict Bilaspur |!(C.G.) !| VERSUS | 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Th_e Secretary, Department of-Sehoor Cducation, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). 2. Janpad Panchaya| Marwahi, i Through: The Chi|ef Executive Officer, Marwahi, [^ibtrict Bilaspur (C.G.). 3. The Additional Collector, Pendra Road, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 4. The District Education Officer, Education District Bilaspur (C.G.). Nl '! .5. The| Zila! Panch^at ^ilaspur, iThrough: The Chilpf Executive Officer, Zila Panctiayat Bilaspur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS. DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. .^'s:^- /•V ~:^ // • . o XI-HC-78 HiH^l ^HT^ ^uET ^i-qio^, u>-al'<-i<i<a, Rrtwy<< ..CW.:f3;..s:.l.AA.. 31T^$T^Tf^TO «^T3I^9TgRtcp ^ £t(^v^b\ ^ ^' ^T^?Tq^('3cifg^f) ^200^ g;^TT8R^ff^T 3TT^^T 25.10.2005 W.P.No.5194/2095 Shri P.P. Sahu, counsel Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, Heard. Learned counsei for th4 reguiarization ofthe petitioner| He further submits that| an opportunity to fi!e a det| authority and the competent same within the stipulated perj This limited prayer mac|i not opposed by the iearned The prayer is aliowed. !f so advised, the pe| raising a!i grievances befor4 representation is filed within 4 the certified copy of this order) authority shai! dispose ofthe ^ period of 3 months from | representatjon. With the aforesaid of. Certified copy as per ri^i cprqfcxn^ ^s+irtT^'fc^ ^FJI^-CI^ ^3?f^T3I^5T for the petitioner. Pa|iel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. petitioner submits that the matter reiates to |on the post of Shiksha Karmi, Grade-SIJ. |for the present, the petitioner may be given t^iied representation before the competent ^uthority may be directed fo dispose of the Jod granted by this Court. by the iearned counsel for the petitioner is cdunsel for the State. titioner may flie a detailed representation the competent authority and if such a period of one month frQm today along with and copy ofthe writ petition, the competent tame as early as possible preferably within a the date of fiiing/receipt of the said obs^r/ations, this petition stands finaiiy disposed es. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ->-y