IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.446 of 2009 Date of decision: January 13, 2009 Parth Singh & another ... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. P.L. Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) This writ petition is filed by the petitioners for the claim of benefit of ad hoc service in seniority in terms of judgment of this Court in the case of Hanumant Singh versus State of Haryana reported as 2008(4) SCT 427. Learned counsel for the petitioners asserts that despite the passage of 3 months, no response has been received to the legal notice dated 16.10.2008 as Annexure P-2. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the legal notice Annexure P-2 by passing a speaking order thereon within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order along with a copy of legal notice. January 13, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE