IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16816 of 2010 ANAND YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 24.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail in connection with a case registered under Sections 363, 366A, 494 of the I.P.C. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after investigation the police submitted charge-sheet under Section 494 I.P.C. The statement of the victim girl has been recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. which is contained in Annexure-4 in which she got her age recorded as 20 years and stated that she has of her own sweetwill married with the petitioner. Annexure-3 depicts the medical board report which suggests the age of the victim girl as 18 years. Annexure- 2 is the affidavit of the victim girl that she has already married with the petitioner. It is vehemently submitted by learned counsel for the informant that petitioner is a married person and subsequently cognizance has been taken under Section 366 A also differing with the police report. Considering the 164 Cr.P.C. statement of the 2 victim girl, the medical report and the submission of final form under Section 494 I.P.C., only for the purposes of bail only, let the petitioner namely Anand Yadav, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Jhanjharpur(Madhubani) in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 18 of 2010. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)