:1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE DISTRICT : APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO.14509 OF 2008 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 407 OF 2005 IN L.C. SUIT NO.543 OF 2005 WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO.14513 OF 2008 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.409 OF 2005 IN L.C. SUIT NO.545 OF 2005 WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO.14518 OF 2008 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.408 OF 2005 IN L.C. SUIT NO.544 OF 2005 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders --------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Mohit Jadhav for the Applicants. Mrs.Geeta Jogalekar for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 23RD JUNE, 2008 P.C : P.C : P.C : By consent, the Appeal from Orders are taken up for admission. 2. The impugned orders warrant no interference. It is true that the :2: impugned orders dated 18.11.2004 have been challenged. However, there are no grounds of challenge to the said orders. It is submitted that after the receipt of the notice under Section 351 the Plaintiffs/Appellants were assured by an MLA that nothing further will happen in the matter. This, needless to state, is not a valid defence even assuming that any MLA has given such an assurance. On the basis of this alleged assurance of the MLA, no documents were even produced pursuant to notice under Section 351. 3. The Appellants are always at liberty to make any representations to the concerned authorities or applications before the trial Court that they so desire on the basis of any documents that they may have come across. 4. Appeal from Orders stand disposed of accordingly. :3: ***