SSP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1635 OF 2010 Harmohan Singh Chandok ...Petitioner vs. Manjula Vithaldas Kapadia & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.M.M.Vashi i/b M/s.M.P.Vashi & Associates for the petitioner Mr.V.P.Sawant for respondent Nos.1 and 2 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : MARCH 22, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 1st and 2nd respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioner has tendered across the bar certified copies of the service reports. The learned counsel for the 1st and 2nd respondents states that instead of keeping the petition pending, the petitioner may be permitted to file a reply to the obstructionist notice by keeping all contentions on merits open. 2 In view of this submission, petition need not be kept pending and the same is disposed of by passing the following order : i) Impugned order dated 27th January 2010 is quashed and set aside and the petitioner is permitted to file a reply to the obstructionist notice on or before 6th April 2010. No further time shall be granted to the petitioner. ii)It will be open for the 1st and 2nd respondents to adduce further evidence in the light of the reply which may be filed by the petitioner. SSP 2 iii)All contentions of the parties on merits of the pending obstructionist notice are expressly kept open. JUDGE