IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.697 of 2008 MD.AZIM @ MAJJU SON OF LATE SHEKH DILHAN MIAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PAROHA, P.S. DUMRA, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SITAMARHI 3. THE INCHARGE OF DEPUTY COLLECTOR, SITAMARHI 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI 5. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SITAMARHI, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI 6. THE OFFICER INCHARGE OF DUMRA POLICE STATION DISTRICT- SITAMARHI. ----------- 2 26.03.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that consequent upon the death of his father who was a Chowkidar under the respondent no.6, no death-cum-retiral dues has been paid to the petitioner who is the son of the deceased employee. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the petitioner has filed the writ application after inordinate delay and that too did not mention any relevant facts. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.2 with a copy to the respondent no.4. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation and upon consideration if any amount is found payable the same shall also be paid. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)