IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9115 of 2008 1. DATA RAM TIWARY 2. PUNKALI DEVI 3. PRIYANKA KUMARI 4. RUBI KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 18/12/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a police case under Sections- 304B and 201 of I.P.C. The submission is of a U.D. Case registered in the State of Uttar Pradesh when the deceased committed suicide by throwing herself in front of a running train. The marriage was hardly one year old. Learned counsel for the State points out from the case diary that the deceased had come to the matrimonial home one day earlier. At this stage, whether it be Section-306 or 304B of I.P.C. in the background of the allegations for demands of dowry, is hardly relevant. The application is rejected insofar as the father- in-law and the mother-in-law, petitioners 1 and 2 are concerned. Only for the reason that petitioners 3 and 4 are stated to be the young unmarried sisters of the husband with generalized allegations, this Court 2 considers it proper to direct that the petitioners 3 and 4 named above shall surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand )each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Doriganj P.S. Case No.76/2007, subject to the conditions laid down under Section- 438(2) Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)