IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.707 of 2006 RAM NARAYAN SAHNI Versus BACHHI DEVI ----------- 3 21/8/2008 This case has been listed at the instance of counsel for the petitioner. Due to mistake of stenographer the orders passed separately in two cases, namely, C.R. No. 706 of 2006 ( Raj Kumari Devi Vs. Bipat Sah @ Deoki Sah ) and C.R. No. 707 of 2006 ( Ram Narayan Sahni Vs. Bachhi Devi ), which were heard and disposed of on the same date, i.e, 16.7.2008, unfortunately got mixed in course of typing out the order, in as much as, the order passed in C.R. 706 of 2006 was typed in C.R. No. 707 of 2006 and vice-versa. This being purely typographical error on the part of the stenographer, this Court would direct to correct the error by treating the following order passed in C.R. No. 707 of 2006:- “Heard counsel for the petitioner. The order of the Court below directing to pay Rs. 1500/- per month as maintenance to the wife/ opposite parties, is neither illegal nor excessive inasmuch as it is an admitted position that the petitioner had himself nominated the opposite party as his wife in service record and also that after retirement of the petitioner he is at least entitled for pension to a sum of Rs.6000/- per month. In that view of the matter, this Court does not find any reason to interfere 2 in the impugned order. Accordingly, this Civil Revision application is dismissed.” ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar