IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 28TH JANUARY 2011 / 8TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 2826 of 2011(C) ------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- NASEEMA.K., W/O.SHARAFUDEEN, AGED 40 YEARS, JUNIOR LANGUAGE TEACHER-ARABIC, B M M U P SCHOOL, CHAPPANANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, DOWN HILL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 519. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MALAPPURAM-676 519. 5. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MALAPPURAM-676 519. 6. THE MANAGER, B M M U P SCHOOL, CHAPPANANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 503. R1 TO R5 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 2826 of 2011-C - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of January, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner was initially appointed as U.P.S.A. in the 6th respondent's school from 13.12.1995 to 30.4.1996 and from 20.8.1997 to 30.4.2003. The said appointments were approved as per Exts.P1 and P2. By Ext.P4 order, the petitioner was appointed in a retirement vacancy. The approval of the same was rejected as per Ext.P5. According to the petitioner, the second and third objections raised by the Asst. Educational Officer are curable. Even though the petitioner filed an appeal before the District Educational Officer, that was rejected as per Ext.P6. Ext.P7 is the revision petition filed by the Manager before the second respondent against Ext.P6 order. It is prayed that the same may be directed to be disposed of within a time frame. 2. Therefore, there will be a direction to the second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P7 revision petition after hearing the petitioner and the Manager, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the second respondent for wpc 2826/2011 2 compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/