IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1059 of 2009 RAI PHULAN PRASAD, son of late Rai Ramchara Prasad, resident of Village – Thikhan Matiayan, Police Station – Vaishali, District Vaishali (Hazipur) …… Petitioner Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Senoir Superintendent of Police, Patna 3. Ruchi Kumari 4. Suruchi Kumari – both are daughters of Chottan Prasad, resident of Village – Thikhamatiaya, Post Office – Madhopur, Police Station Vaishali, District Vaishali at Hazipur 5. Ragani Sinha, Wife of Chottan Prasad 6. Chottan Prasad Son of Late Ram Lochan Prasad Both residents of Village – Thikhamatiya, Post Office Madhopur, Police Station Vaishali, District Vaishali at Hazipur …. ……… Respondents ----------- 02- 24.12.2009 Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra for the petitioner, learned Assistant Counsel to Govt. Pleader no.V for respondent nos. 1 and 2, and Mr. Sarita Kumari Bajaj for respondent nos. 3 and 4. We do not feel the necessity of issuing notice to respondent nos. 5 and 6 in view of the nature of the order that we are going to pass. According to the writ petition, respondent nos. 3 and 4 are the daughters of respondent nos. 5 and 6, and they are unwilling to live with their parents, i.e. respondent nos. 5 and 6. It is, therefore, prayed that the petitioner may be given guardianship of respondent nos. 3 and 4 whom he shall nurture them as his own daughters. To this has to be added the oral statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner that, in view of certain orders of this Court, respondent no.3 has already been released from the Remand Home. Therefore, it is submitted, respondent no.4 may also be released from the 2 Remand Home and may be assigned to the guardianship of the petitioner. 2. It appears from a perusal of paragraph 12 of the writ petition that the petitioner has already approached the learned court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali, by preferring Guardian Case no.4/09 for identical relief. In that view of the matter, we do not wish to proceed further with the present writ petition on the ground that the petitioner has already approached the appropriate forum. 3. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali, to dispose of the Guardian Case 4/09, expeditiously keeping in mind that it involves the welfare and future of minor girls. ( S K Katriar ) ( Kishore K Mandal ) mrl