IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 240 of 2011 Ayaz Ahmad. ………. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. ..………. Respondents Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyaya, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent Nos. 1 & 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J. BARIN GHOSH, C. J. (Oral) A similar dispute was dealt with by this Court on 10th May, 2011 in connection with Writ Petition No. 255 of 2008 (S/B) and Writ Petition No. 244 of 2008 (S/B). The facts of this case are more or less identical. In this case too, a final allocation list was prepared and, subsequently, the same was kept in abeyance and, later on, the same was interfered with by deleting the name of the petitioner from the said final allocation list. Similar was the case in those writ petitions, referred to above. This Court, while dealing with the matters in connection with the said writ petitions, held as follows: “6. The Central Government, in 2006, declared by the final allocation that the petitioners stand allocated to the State of Uttarakhand. Assuming, for good reasons, the said decision could be interfered by the Central Government, but apparently, there is no just reason to interfere with the same, for the only reason is non- availability of posts, whereas as aforesaid more than 100 posts were available for being allocated to 34 optees. We, accordingly, find no reason on the part of the Central Government to interfere with its decision of 2006 and, accordingly, set aside all orders passed by the Central Government subsequent to such final allocation of petitioners made in 2006. The writ petitions are allowed to the extent as above.” 2 2. We, accordingly, pass the same order in connection with the present writ petition and in relation to the petitioner herein. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (U.C. Dhyani, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C. J.) 15.12.2011 15.12.2011 G