IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1247 of 2009 RAJU KUMAR YADAV @ TULSI SINGH, S/o Sri Tulsi Singh Yadav, R/o Vill. Bhaisawala P.S. Kudra, District-Kaimur (Bhabhua) Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheel Bhadra Jha, Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, A.P.P. --------- 5/ 14.10.2009 Heard both the parties. Petitioner has been alleged for kidnapping of informant’s son namely, Kunj Bihari Gupta @ Sonu, who though is recovered but his submission is that he was taken to Mundeshwari Devi where some others accompanied them and on the way to their village, some more accompanied them. Lastly, Sonu was told that he was kidnapped by those persons. In that course, he disclosed name of some of the accused persons which he heard, while they were talking and keeping watch upon him. Some mobiles are used for demanding ransom and on confession of some of the accused persons, it has come that they used to obtain SIM in the name of different persons and used them in committing crime. This much goes to show that petitioner is in association of veteran known and unknown criminals even by nature they are known and can go to any extent. Sonu was a good friend of petitioner and he was not spared by him and his associates. So, in my opinion also his prayer for bail has rightly been rejected by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as by the Appellate Court as all the three ingredients namely appearing all reasonable ground for believing that the release would likely to 2 bring him into association with known criminal or further expose him moral, physical and psychological danger and his release defeats the ends of justice and his remaining in custody since 05.01.2009 is also of no avail. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is rejected. However, the Court below is directed to expedite the trial. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)