IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 9499 of 2007 Between: Coromandel Fertilizers Employees Union, Regd.3457 Rep.by its General secretary, S.Sudhakar, S/o.late Apparao Sriharipuram, Visakhapatnam ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Employment, Training and Factories Dept., secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner of Labour, Government of Andhra Pradesh, RTC X Roads, Hyderabad 3 Coromandel Fertilizers Ltd., rep.by its Managing Director Coromandel House, SP Road, Secunderabad 4 General Manager(Manufacturing), Coromandel Fertilizers Ltd., Sriharipuram,. Visakhapatnam .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No.1 and 2 in initiating prosecution proceedings against the 3rd and 4th respondents under Industrial Disputes Act, as arbitrary, illegal, and consequently direct the respondents No.1 and 2 to initiate prosecution proceedings under section 25-T and 25-U of the I.D.Act,against the 3rd and 4th respondents and pass such other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:DR.P.B.VIJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following : O R D E R: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO J., Dt.11.06.2009 tjs