IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 9326 OF 2004. PETITION NO. 9326 OF 2004. PETITION NO. 9326 OF 2004. Shri Bapurao Dinkarrao Pathak. ... Petitioner. V/s. Shri Keshav Vishwanath Pathak. ... Respondents. Rahul S. Kate for the petitioner. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 16th November 2005. 16th November 2005. 16th November 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. . The petitioner has suffered concurrent findings of fact. In spite of order of the Court he failed to deposit amount of rent regularly. The view taken by the lower appellate Court is a reasonable and possible view. No case is made out to interfere with the same. . Petition is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, J.) J.) J.)