IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.03 OF 2008. APPLICATION NO.03 OF 2008. APPLICATION NO.03 OF 2008. IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.92 OF 2006. APPEAL NO.92 OF 2006. APPEAL NO.92 OF 2006. .................................................................. Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. .................................................................. Shri G.V.Limaye for the Applicant. Shri S.B.Shetye for the Respondent Nos.1A to 1D, 2 and 3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 07th January, 2008. : 07th January, 2008. : 07th January, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard advocates appearing for the parties. The prayer in this application made by the appellant in the Second Appeal is for quashing proceedings of an application under section 70(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 filed by the respondents in the Second Appeal. In the alternative, a prayer is made for stay of the proceeding of the said application. 2. The contention is that during the pendency of the Second Appeal, the Agricultural Lands Tribunal cannot be allowed to proceed with the hearing of the said application. 3. The said prayers cannot be acceded to. If ... 2 ... any adverse order is passed by the authorities under the said Act of 1948 the applicant can always challenge the said order in accordance with law. No case is made out for grant of interim relief as prayed. Application is rejected. Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE