Cri. Appln. No. 3790/11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3790 OF 2011 Baban s/o. Haribhau Ghatule ....Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent. Mr. Ravindra Nirmal, Advocate for applicant. Mr. K.J. Ghute-Patil , APP for respondents. CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 13th September, 2011. PER COURT : 1. This application is filed for anticipatory bail in Cr. No. 32/2011 registered in Himayat Nagar Police Station, Dist. Nanded for offences punishable under sections 409, 420, 467, 471 etc. of IPC. The previous bail application is rejected after hearing both the sides. Today both the sides are heard. 2. The only so called new circumstance which was argued is that in initial preliminary enquiry, suspicion was expressed against other officers also, but the report is given only against the present Cri. Appln. No. 3790/11 2 applicant. The crime is registered for serious offences of misappropriation, creation of false record and cheating. During investigation, if it transpires that some more persons are involved, the investigating agency is at liberty to take appropriate step and action in that regard. It was submitted that due to arrest and keeping the applicant behind bars for more than 48 hours, the applicant can be suspended in view of Rules made in this regard and so subject to some conditions, relief can be granted. This submission is not acceptable. Such provisions are made only to prevent such kind of misconduct by the Government servant or a person who was working with a local body. It is surprising that even after rejection of the previous bail application on 26.7.2011, the applicant has not surrendered. It is already observed that in view of serious nature of offence, the custodial interrogation is must. So the applications stands rejected. [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] ssc/ca