IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 5TH JUNE 2008 / 15TH JYAISHTA 1930 RP.No. 550 of 2008() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.8389/2008 Dated 19/03/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1,3 TO 7: --------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), CORPORATION OF COCHIN, VYTTILA, COCHIN-19. 2. SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. CIVIL STATION BUILDING, KAKKANAD, KOCHI-30. 5. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT, CIVIL STATION BUILDING, KAKKANAD, KOCHI-30. 6. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER RESPONDENTS: PETITIONERS & 2ND RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------ 1. GRACE JOACHIM, AGED 73 YEARS, W/O. LATE JOACHIM, C.C.NO.1/1239,ELANJIKKAL HOUSE, FORT KOCHI P.O., KOCHI-682 001. 2. E.J. SAMPATH, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O. LATE JOACHIM, C.C.NO.1/1239,ELANJIKKAL HOUSE, FORT KOCHI P.O., KOCHI-682 001. 3. E.J. ANAND, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O. LATE JOACHIM, C.C.NO.1/1239,ELANJIKKAL HOUSE, FORT KOCHI P.O., KOCHI-682 001. 4. MARADU GRAMA PANCHAYAT (SPECIAL GRADE), MARADU P.O., PIN-682 304, KANAYANNUR TALUK, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BASANTH BALAJI THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.No.550 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 5th day of June, 2008 ORDER Learned counsel for the respondents seeks time. But since the learned Government Pleader asserts that in this case much before the judgment in question was passed, declaration under Section 6 had been promulgated, I am inclined to allow the review petition. Review Petition is allowed. The judgment sought to be reviewed is recalled and the writ petition will stand posted for hearing. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE sv.