WP(C) 419/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MADAN B LOKUR According to the petitioner, the respondent No. 4 has been appointed as an Angan wadi Helper in Near Bibek Das’s House, Anganwadi Centre No.-31 in Kharupetia T own, Darrang. According to her, respondent No. 4 was not a resident of that area and, therefore, could not have been appointed. Notice has been issued in the matter and the respondents 1 to 3 accepted notice on 22/1/2010. Respondent No. 4 has been served and is represented by her learned counsel. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn my attention to the decisio n in Miss Nureda Begum versus State of Assam and others, WP(C) 802/2010 decided on 25/5/2011. In the above writ petition, the facts were somewhat similar to the prese nt writ petition and a learned Single Judge has directed the Director of Social Welfare Department, Assam to look into the grievance of the petitioner and make an enquiry and arrive at some finding in regard to the grievances raised by the petitioner therein. Learned counsel for the parties are agreed that a similar order be passe d in the writ petition. Accordingly, the Director of Social Welfare Department will look into the grieva nces of the petitioner and take a decision after hearing the respondent No. 4. T he decision be taken within a period of six months from today. Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms.