s.cT'Jes'-- / JN THE HIGH GOURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTKGARH WRIT PETITION. NO't-54DOp 2005 BETWEEN •» Ku.Uttra Singh D/o Late Shri Kaushal Singh , aged about 43 years, occupation Assistant Teacher , posted at Janpad Prunary School Sonsari , resident of Village Sonsari , Block Akaltara , Tahsil and District Janjgir Champa, (CG). o' / PETITIONER /..<?^3\/<^i' j^y^]'^y ^ ' vy0^' AND .^~ s.0 g ^fl. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through fhe Secretary Department of School Education, Maritralay, Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Building, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 51il The Director, Public Instructions, Raipur, TahsU and District Raipur (CG). / 3. The District Education Officer, Janjgir Champa, District Jaiijgir Champa (CG). ./.^ ^y -<&•' ^ .- <^y >.'»' i 4. The Block Education Offlcer, Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa. / 5. The Head Master, Janpad Primary School Sonsari , Block Akaltara yfiistrict Janjgir Champa (CQ). RBSPONDENTS WRn'PEyriTIONUITOEKitRmE^i2ae/2^0I?eONSTnTJTI^ OFUraUA \d'CT|.-qi«ICt'q,0!Tsl<tl«l'6,R<')l'My< HW^l^W Kj^^^iyo 7a»- ^Ft,2Qq an^iTOfS'ti* aaiiaii^OTri>*f SR 3n^9T q3^ (l?(^<!W) whb 07/10/2005 Smt Mala Dubey, Shri Bliaskar Pys advauce copy. Heard.:} • The petitioner, has chaUenged the leg in. which, she has been The subinissiou o the petitioner is prese; Sonsari and if she will 60-70 kias., she wfll hai the petitioner is feeling son of fhe petitioner is village Sonsari, fherefe^ aad was worfeing peacf filed this petition on the| It is a; setfled po; interfered by a Coilrt violation of; any statu^ transfer of :aa em.ploy| govemiiig' ttie act of thej passed by its aufhori^ difficulties ofits emiplo^ So fhat they m.ay ren( «n«i[CT<nTiiiifflT^'l's'<l •(Ri'tji>( iiisrf^igii^r ^ ; , [leamed couq.sel for the petitioner. ii, Panel Lawyer for State/respondents on is a widow lady andjaged about 43 years ity ofher tiansfer order dated 31/8/2005 ^•ausferred froiu SonssEri to Barpali. learaed counsel for the petitioner is that [ifly residiag wifh her parents ia viUage sent to Barpali, which is at a distance of to live aloue there. In the said situation, uisecured. She further subinits that the . studying in a coUege which is situated rieay :, she was enjoying the coinpany of her son fuUy. In fhis inaaner, fhe petitioner has ground ofher persoual difficulties. lition fhat fhe order of transfers are to be )f law on certani grounds of inala&de' or ory rule or aay priliciple gQveming fhe However, these are not fhe factors State while iaferfering an orderof transfer and tiie State cau always look into the :es so as to keep fhein ia such a conditiou :r excellent serviees to the State. The XI-HG-78 TVT^isew <jCT^.4|i^tyAI;u-at<n*t®,fi»)'M^ ''.f^J^.S.J.^.—.- 3II^I!|iTR'<i<H aanai^CTiB'wK 3]T^Tlraq!(ij<llyi<g) g<gmR'!ll%cT3n^T ibHld41"l «fl*ldT<fft<^>^ ipg^ian^i wetfare of,fhe exnployee is Q^e of the icaportant considerations to be kept in the inind oftheau Iiorities pfthe State. For (t^time being, tlicjugh I am not inclined to iaterfere in the aiatt^'F;' '&ut I am incluil If so advised, the petitii •d to direct fhe petitioner to file a detailett irc'pSigsentation befort fhe CQncemed authority aad if the t I *' petitioner Eles fhe represent^tidp, the concemed authority inust decide the same oa fhe prmci^)les referred above. (iner niay ffle a representation before the conceined authority witl(in a period of 15 days froin today aloagwith fhe certified copy cj such a representation is G^ dispose of the same as early s fthis order aad writ petition aad tf :d, the coinpetent aufhorily shedl s possible preferablyroithiua period of 6 weeks froin today and fh4 result of the representation shaU be communieated to the peti.tione^. In the nieanwhfle, the ^mpugned order of transfer shaH be kept in abeyaace for a period cf8 -weeks froia today. ids finaUy disposed of wifh- the This Writ Petition sl aforesaid directions. • Consequently M(W)P N4.3679/2005 and IA No.8183/2005 staiids disposed of. CC as per rules. | Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Bi