(-1-) hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 36 OF 2009 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 36 OF 2009 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 36 OF 2009 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2999 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2999 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2999 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus M/s. WIMCO Ltd. Mumbai. ... Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant. Mr. A.K. Jasani for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 12TH MARCH, 2009 DATED: 12TH MARCH, 2009 DATED: 12TH MARCH, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Considering the cause shown particularly in Para 4(7) and after hearing the counsel, in our opinion, the same would amount to sufficient cause. In the light of that, delay condoned. Office to register the appeal provided office objections are removed within six weeks from today. If the office objections are not removed, the appeal to stand dismissed without further orders from this court. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)