T.A. No.539 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH T.A. No.539 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision.02.12.2010 Renu W/o Sh. Pardeep Sharma D/o Sh. Rajender Lal Bhaskar, R/0 37/112, Paramjit Gang, Kapurthala (Punjab) ......Appellant Versus Pardeep Sharma son of Sh. Parmanand Sharma R/o H.No.418, Albert Road, Amritsar ......Respondentss Present: Mr. Padam Jain, Advocate for for the appellant. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The application is for transfer of matrimonial proceedings pending before Additional Civil Judge (S.D.), Amritsar to Kapurthala, the place where the petitioner is said to live now and working as a Lecturer in that place. Her complaint is that only Rs.5,000/- has been given to her for maintenance as one time payment and it will not be sufficient for her to undertake frequent visits to Amritsar. Her contention is that her husband is very well provided for and very affluent, whereas she has not enough means. 2. The applicant will be at liberty to apply to the court for appropriate litigation expenses that would spell out the details of likely expenses to be incurred for transportation. If such an application is moved, the trial Court will also consider and pass appropriate orders on the same. T.A. No.539 of 2010 (O&M) -2- 3. I cannot accept plea for inconvenience of a wife who is working in a college as Lecturer. The plea for inconvenience cannot, therefore, avail to the applicant and the application for transfer is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 02, 2010 Pankaj*