AB 3037/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Surana, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. B.S. Sinha, learned Addl. P.P., Assam. The petitioner, namely, Smt. Rani Das, is seeking the privilege of pre-a rrest bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. apprehending arrest in connection with Disp ur P.S. Case No.1905/2010 registered under Section 468/471/420/ 490 IPC. I have perused the case diary as produced by the learned P.P. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the materials available in the case diary, I am of the view that the privilege of p re-arrest bail is to be granted to the petitioner and hence the order of interim bail passed on 23.09.2011 is made absolute, however, with the following conditi ons:- (i) The petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation by a polic e officer as and when required; (ii) She shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or pro mise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against her so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police office r; (iii) She shall not leave the jurisdiction of the learned Chief Judicial Magis trate, Kamrup without the written permission of that Court. The bail application is accordingly disposed of.