IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL C-482 No. 495 of 2007 Swarn Singh ………..Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand & another ….Respondents. Present: Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Nandan Arya, AGA for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent no.1. Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate for respondent no.2. Date of Decision: 16.09.2010 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J (Oral) Heard Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the applicant, Mr. Nandan Arya, AGA for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent no.1 and Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate for respondent no.2. This Criminal Misc. application has been filed by the applicant under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. challenging the summoning order dated 28.09.2006 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ist, Dehradun, in Criminal Case No. 1928 of 2007 Sunil Kumar Gupta Vs. Swarn Singh under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (from hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) whereby the court below has taken cognizance of a complaint made by the complainant/respondent no.2 and issued summons against the applicant. Brief facts of the case are that two cheques were withdrawn by the applicant in favour of the complainant/respondent no.2 amounting to Rs.4,00,000/-and Rs.1,10,000/- respectively which were duly submitted in the Bank and was dishonored for the reasons “not arranged for”. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that in case there is an alleged dishonour of two cheques, two separate complaints ought to have been filed. The second submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that there is a statutory violation of provision under the Act in filing the complaint as it was not filed within time. All these technical aspects can be looked into by the court below. It is not for this Court to determine these aspects while adjudicating this matter under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The present C-482 application is totally devoid of merit and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. Interim order dated 24.7.2007 is also vacated. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the court concerned for necessary compliance. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J) 16.09.2010 Kuldeep