IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 12TH APRIL 2007 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1929 WP(C).No. 1395 of 2007(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- C.V.RAMAKRISHNAN, (RETD. TEACHER), KIZHAKKEDATH VEEDU, "GURUKULA ASHRAMAM", CHOONDAL P.O., THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT SRI.RANJIT BABU RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. CHOONDAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT, CHOONDAL P.O., THRISSUR, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SUBRAMANIAN.K.S., S/O.SANKARAN, KANDAMPALLI HOUSE, CHOONDAL P.O., THRISSUR. 3. THANKAMANI, D/O.KRISHNANKUTTY, KUNNATHUTTY, CHOONDAL P.O., THRISSUR. R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.VINOD KUMAR SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN SRI.MANOJ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J ------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) .1395 OF 2007 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 12th day of April, 2007 JUDGMENT Sri.Rajit submits that Ext.P4 judgment came to be passed by this court on the basis of a submission made by the petitioners in that case (respondents 2 and 3 herein) that appeals (Exts.P3 and P4) are filed by them. Sri.Rajit asserts that no such appeals were actually preferred by respondents 2 and 3 at all. 2. Smt.Preethi Ramakrishnan counsel for the 1st respondent panchayat submits that she is not in a position to assert that respondents 2 and 3 have actually preferred appeals. 3. Even though the name of counsel for respondents 2 and 3 is shown in the cause list, there is no representation for them. 4. In these circumstances, the writ petition will stand disposed of issuing the following directions. Respondents 2 and 3 are directed to furnish the details of the appeals referred to by them in Ext.P4 to the panchayat within one week of receiving a copy of this judgment being W.P.(C) .1395 OF 2007 :: 2 :: placed by them by the writ petitioner. The petitioner will inform the panchayat also when he places a copy of this judgment before respondents 2 and 3. If the panchayat does not receive the details from respondents 2 and 3 regarding the pendency of the appeals within the stipulated time, the panchayat will implement Ext.P1 order issued by the Ombudsman. Sd/- PIUS C. KURIAKOSE (JUDGE) sk1/- //true copy// P.S. to Judge. W.P.(C) .1395 OF 2007 :: 3 :: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J ------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) .1395 OF 2007 JUDGMENT 12th April, 2007 ------------------------------------------