1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL WRIT No. 363 of 2007 M/S.KARWASRA WOOLEN MILLS PVT.LTD. V/S STATE & ANR. Mr. SS PUROHIT, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 19.2.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The factory was taken possession of way back in the year 2001, and since then no efforts are shown to have been made by the petitioner to make any payment, as such now the factory has been advertised for auction vide Annexure.-4. It is submitted by the petitioner that he made representation prior to this advertisement for requesting the RIICO to make effort to revive the unit. Suffice it to say that a look at the representation Annexure-2 shows that all that has been pleaded therein is that as to how the petitioner suffered losses, and that the key person of the petitioner unit was 2 sick, and then it is prayed that the Bank can take steps for getting subsidy of 60 lacs, and has prayed for delivering back the possession. Significantly nothing has been said in this writ petition as to what the petitioner is prepared to do, and how does he purport to extend his input for revival of the unit except saying that 60 lacs subsidy may be given. In my view, in these circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled to any interference in the writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /sushil/