WPSS No.127 of 2009 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Mr. Manav Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. (Stay Application No.1005 of 2009) By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the transfer order dated 03.02.2009 mainly on the ground that same has been passed in violation of transfer policy and also on the ground that the petitioner has been transferred during mid session. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the respondents may be directed to retain the petitioner at present place of posting till the end of academic session. In support of his argument learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Director of School Education, Madras and Others vs. O. Karuppa Thevan and Another, 1994 Supp (2) S.C.C. 666. He further argued that the petitioner is a Class III employee and transfer order does not show the exigencies of service which are urgent in nature for his mid session transfer. Learned Standing Counsel argued that the petitioner has been transferred for the exigencies of administration and the writ petition deserves to be rejected. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that the respondents will permit the petitioner to remain at present place of posting till 30th April, 2009. Petitioner is directed to join at his transferred place immediately after 30th April, 2009. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (Stay Application No.1005 of 2009 stands disposed of). (V.K. Bist, J.) 16.02.2009 Arti