IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 863 OF 2009 (SS) Smt. Pronita Garg ……..Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ..Respondents. Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 23rd October, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for petitioner and Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand. As per the averments of the writ petition, the petitioner was finally allocated to the State of U.P., yet the authorities in the State of Uttarakhand were not relieving the petitioner for State of U.P., hence the petitioner filed present writ petition. In the counter affidavit, which has been filed by the State, it has been stated that vide order dated 31st August, 2009, the petitioner has been relieved for the State of U.P. In view of this fact, the cause of action no more survives in the present writ petition and the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 23.10.2009 Rathour