IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 13848 of 2008 Between: M.V. Krishna Rao, S/o. Late M. Bushaiah, M/s. Anupama Selections, Plot No.145, Krishna Commercial Complex, Bhagyanagar, Cooperative Housing Society, Opp to KPHB Colony, Hyderabad - 72. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.P. Central Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad - 72, Rep. byits Managing director. 2 The Assistant Engineer (Operation), A.P. Central Power Distribution Company Limited, Bhagyanagar Section, K.P.H.B Colony, Hyderabad. 3 Sri A. Krishna Murthy Raju, S/o. Late Lakshmi Narsimha Raju, R/o. H.No. MIG 54, 1st Phase, 1st Road, K.P.H.B. Colony, Hyderabad - 72. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction, preferably a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 & 2 in highhandedly disconnecting power supply to the Service Nos. 0090, 0092 & 0093 of the Petitioner in respect of the Petitioners Shop Nos. 7,8 & 9 of ground floor, situate in Plot No. 145, Krishna Commercial Comlex, Bhagyanagar Colony, Opp to KPHB Colony, Hyderabad as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 & 21 of the Constitution of India; and consquently direct the respondents 1 & 2 to forthwith restore power supply to the Service Nos. 0090, 0092 & 0093 of the Petitioner in respect of the Petitioners Shop Nos. 7,8 & 9 of ground floor, situate in Plot No. 145, Krishna Commercial Comlex, Bhagyanagar Colony, Opp to KPHB Colony, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.O.MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following at the stage of admission : ORAL ORDER: It is conjointly represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the Respondents 1 and 2 that power supply has been restored to the petitioner, the disconnection of which is the subject matter of the writ petition. In the light of the conjoint representation made, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. GODA RAGHURAM, J Date: 14.7.2008 cvm