IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI THURSDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 34739 of 2010(N) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- REGUNATHAN NAIR, S/O. NARAYANA PILLAI, AGED 56 YEARS, MARUTHATHOOR DESOM, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, CHAIKKOTTUKONAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (DIST). BY ADV. SRI.R.GOPAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NEYYATTINKARA. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEYYATTINKARA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. T.S.NARAYANAN, S/O. RAMALINGAM, ALIKKAL HOUSE, KALAKKAL P.O., CHERPULASSERI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT PIN – 679312. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. T.K. VIPINDAS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. K.M.JOSEPH & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== W.P.(C) NO. 34739 OF 2010 ============================ Dated this the 25th day of November, 2010 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. The petitioner has approached this court complaining harassment by police. The petitioner has two sons. It is alleged that the second son quarrelled and he left the house in 2004 and he has no connection and contacts till today. A police constable from Neyyattinkara Police Station is alleged to have come on 12.11.2010 with a special messenger and enquired about the petitioner's son Mr.Prasad stating that notice was issued in WP (C)No.444 of 2010 on the file of this court filed by the fourth respondent. The police constable is alleged to have threatened the petitioner and he has forced to accept the summons of Prasad. The petitioner was harassed, it is alleged and threatened that if the petitioner fails to produce Smt.Dhanalakshmi and his son Prasad, he will be implicated in a non bailable offence. Third respondent kept the petitioner in police station from 10 am to 5pm. Wpc 34739/2010 2 2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that it is true that there was habeas corpus petition and 5th respondent in the petition is the son of the petitioner. Notice could not be served on him and notice was accepted by the petitioner. He would submit that there will be no harassment of the petitioner. We record the same and close the writ petition. K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE M.C. HARI RANI,JUDGE lgk