1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BHAspnR WRIT PETITION (S) No. «53% OF 2010 PETITIONER .P. Trivedi , S/o Late Shri A.R. Tn'vedi, aged about 46 years, Occupation- Service, posted as Revenue Officer, at Municipal Corporation, Korba , R/o Nagar Nigam Colony, Kosabadi, Korba, Tahsil and District— Korba (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. V State of Chhattisgarh, through I Secretary, Urban Administration" & Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District- aipur, (C..), R G 2. he Unde Setary, Cttigarh overnmnt, Urban Admstratin 8a evelopment Deparment D t, D..S. Bwan Raipur, isict— Raip C.G.), /T r ecr hhas Ge inio K ha Dtr ur, ( x Cosne eo ‘ 3. mmisior cum Dirctr, Un i Admison m Catg Rp C. 4. t Dpy Direto thaniya hi Sum Paikshak, rb istrict— Korba, (C.G.). Directorate of rba intrati 8a Developent, hhtisarh, aiur, District— Raipur, (.G). Development, Regional Office, Bilaspur (CG). “ eut cr, S Nid r Koa, D 5. The Collector, ,Korba, District Korba (CG). 6.“) The Joint Director, Urban Administration and 8. The Deputy Director, Esthaniya Nidhi Sapariksha, Ghantaghar, Korba, District- Korba (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UzA 226 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA 7 Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Korba, District— Korba, (C.G.). H HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I'I'ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3587 of2010 B.P.Trivedi. VERSUS State ofChhaxtisgarh & Others. PETITIONER ‘WRIT PETTI'ION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Aylihoh'ILJ. Present: Shri Sunil Eahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Government Advocate fox the I respondent No. 1 to 6 and 8. Shri B.D.Guru, Advocate for the respondent No. ’7. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 30 day ofJune, 2G11) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was promoted to the post of Revenue O$cer &om the post of Revenue OITicer, Grade II, vide order dated 20.06.2008 .(Annexure P/3). Later on, without affording any opportumhy of hearing the said promotion order was suspended vide order 29.09.2009 (Anneme P/1). Thereanar, by order dated 13.07.2010 (Annexure P/2), the petitioner was transferred hom Korba to Ambikapur, on the post ofRevenue Ohicer, Grade II.‘ if: 4 2. Shri Sahu next submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by a decision ofthis Court in Sheet Chand Jain &Another v. State of Chhattz’sgarh & Others’ and other connected matters, wherein this Court, has set aside the order of cancellation ofpromotion. 3. Shri Dwivedi, learned State counsel does not oontrovert the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that in the above facts and circumstances, the impugned I) ‘w.p.(S) No. 6710/2009 \ éS transfer order requiws to be mod$ed as it is indisputable that by the impugaed order, they were placed on a lower post. In View of the above stated facts and submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, the impugned orders daled 29.09.2009 (Annexure P/l) and 13.7.2010 (Annexure P/2) in respect ofthe petitioner, are quashed reserving liberty to the State to pass order anesh, if so advised, in public interest and administrative exigency. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is ##x disposed of. i Sd/— ‘ Satish K. Agnihotri 9 Judge Amit