IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2008 / 11TH ASHADHA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2186 of 2008() ------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER IN CRL.M.P.NO.2700 OF 2008 DATED 26.06.08 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE ADOOR REVN. PETITIONER: ------------------------------------ ANILKUMAR, S/O SOMANPILLAI, KEEZHTHARYIL HOUSE, ADOOR TLUK, PANDALAM VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.SUNNY MATHEW RESPONDENTS: -------------------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PANDALAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, ADOOR. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.M.NAZAR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.R.P.No.2186 of 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2008 ORDER The petitioner challenges the first condition imposed by the J.F.C.M, Adoor in Crl.M.P.No.2700 of 2008 while granting interim release of the mini lorry in question. According to the petitioner, since the lorry was not loaded with sand at the time of its seizure, insistence by the learned Magistrate on depositing Rs.25,000/-in cash was not called for. 2. I cannot agree. 3. The case of the prosecution is that the mini lorry was seized after it had unloaded the sand which was illegally transported in the lorry. Hence the condition imposed by the learned Magistrate is perfectly legal and in accord with the decision Ahammedkutty v. State of Kerala ( 2008(1) KLT 1068). This Crl.R.P. is accordingly dismissed. Dated this the 2 nd day of July, 2008. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj