IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST, TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN : PREENT : THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 1483 of 2003 (Criminal Revision case under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P. C. to revise the order of the Court of the IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, at Hyderabad, made in CRl.A.No.125 of 2003 , dated 24-9- 2003, preferred against the Order of the Court of the XVI Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, passed in C.C.No.328 of 2000, dated. 13-2- 2003.) Between: K. Venkat Reddy @ A.K. Venkat Reddy, Occ: Proprietor of M/s. Sri Shanker Trading Company, Shop No. 375/1, Sri Krupa Market, Mahaboob Mansion, Malakpet, Hyderabad and R/o H. NO. 16-1-31/A/1, Saidabad Colony, Hyderabad. Petitioner AND 1. The State of A.P., rep. through Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 2. B. Buchi Reddy, S/o Late Venkat Reddy, Occ: Pensioner, Advocate and Agriculture, R/o. H.No.16-2-51/F/4, (954), Akberbagh, Hyderabad- 500 036. Respondent (Respondent in- do-) The petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and grounds filed herein and the orders of the High Court dated: 26-09-2003 made in Crl. MP. No. 6901 of 2003 and dt: 10-8-2007 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S. Jagadish, Advocate for the petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1, and of Sri K. Suresh Reddy, Advocate on behalf of the Respondent No. 2, the Court made the following; ORDER: “When the matter has come up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner brought an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- cash. The said amount is paid to 2nd respondent viZ., Mr. B.Butchi Reddy, in open court and 2nd respondent also acknowledges the same by filing a stamped receipt. He contended that he parted away the amount from out of his pension benefits on 10-06-1998 and since last 9 years he has lost the interest on the said amount. Under the above circumstances, the learned counsel submitted that interest at 18% may be directed to be paid by the petitioner. I see some force in the contention raised by the counsel for the 2nd respondent and as per the calculation it comes to Rs. 1,62,000/-. Further, the petitioner has already fixed an affidavit on 10-08-2007 by undertaking to pay the interest as fixed by this Court. So, taking note of the said undertaking and of the submissions made on behalf of the 2nd respondent, I feel it would suffice if the matter is posted to 12-09-2007 for payment of interest of Rs. 1,62,000/-. Post on 12-09-2007.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, at Hyderabad, 2. The XVI Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad 3. B. Buchi Reddy, S/o. late Venkat Reddy, Advocate and Agriculture, R/o. H.No.16-2-51/F/4, (954), Akberbagh, Hyderabad- 500 036. 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 5. One CC to Sri S.Jagadish, Advocate (OPUC) 6. One CC to Sri K. Suresh Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 7. One Spare Copy. HIGH COURT AB DRAFTED ON 10-09-2007 TMKJ DATE: 22-8-2007 NOTE: POST ON 12-09-2007 ORDER CRL.R.C. NO. 1483 OF 2007 DIRECTION