IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 67 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 81 OF 2007 IN PETITION NO. 909 OF 2007 Mrs. Jaya Umesh Pawar ........ Petitioner versus Narendra Murthu Nagraj ........Caveator. Mr. Sagar B. Agarkar adv. For the caveator. CORAM: A. P DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 1st July, 2009. P. C.: 1. This Chamber Summons is taken out by the caveator for condonation of delay inr filing affidavit in support of the caveat. The plaintiff is the daughter of the deceased, for obtaining the probate on whose will the testamentary petition has been filed. The caveator is the son of the deceased and has caveatable interest. There is delay of 100 days in filing the affidavit in support of the caveat and the delay has been explained by filing the affidavit. The reason that is stated is that there were family problems which required the caveator to visit his native place in Karnataka. Perused the reasons spelt out in the affidavit. The reply is filed by the petitioner opposing the chamber summons for condonation of delay. However I am satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown explaining the delay of 100 days. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances and in the interest of justice I condone the delay. Chamber summons is allowed and disposed of. Stand over for two weeks. (A. P. Deshpande, J.)