-#- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1110 OF 2006 P.Jayachandran...............Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors...Respondents Mr. B.D’Souza i/b. M.P. Vashi & Associates for the Petitioner Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP for Respondent NO.1. Mr. R.V. Govilkar for Respondent NO.2. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 20th April,2006 DATE : 20th April,2006 DATE : 20th April,2006 P.C.: . The O.G. challenged is similar to what was challenged in Maharashtra Board of Secontary & Maharashtra Board of Secontary & Maharashtra Board of Secontary & Higher Secondary Education & Anr. vs. Paritosh Higher Secondary Education & Anr. vs. Paritosh Higher Secondary Education & Anr. vs. Paritosh Bhupeshkumar Sheth & Ors., (1984) 4 SCC 27. Bhupeshkumar Sheth & Ors., (1984) 4 SCC 27. Bhupeshkumar Sheth & Ors., (1984) 4 SCC 27. The Apex Court has upheld the validity of such a provision. It is then submitted that the Mumbai University has made a provision for giving xerox copy of the papers. Merely because the University has done is no ground for this Court to direct the respondents to make such a provision. That would be an exercise in Legislation which this Court cannot do. At the highest it is for the petitioner to make a representation and it is for the Respondents to consider the same. With the above observation petition disposed of. (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J)