IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-28928 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:23.09.2011 Surinder Kaur and another . . .Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another . . . Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Varun Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This is a second petition for anticipatory bail. The earlier petition was filed vide CRM-M-1659 of 2011 by Mr.G.S. Punia, Advocate in which the following order was passed on 30.8.2011: “Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition. Dismissed as withdrawn.” Now the present petition has been filed through Mr.Varun Gupta, Advocate, who has fairly stated that there is no change in circumstance. This is not a healthy practice of filing the petition by change of counsel without there being any change of circumstances. In view of the above, I do not find any reason to grant bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) SEPTEMBER 23, 2011 JUDGE Vivek