IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5918 of 2010 1. Rameshwar Singh S/O Late Rambriskh Singh R/O Vill Barwashekh, P.O.Belwa More, P.S.Lauria, Distt-West Champaran, Presently Residing At Vill-Jimri Nautanwa, P.O.Konai, Bhelai, P.S.Semra(Chewtanha),Distt-West Champaran 2. Lalan Sah S/O Sri Asharfi Sah R/O Vill Bariarwa, P.O.Chowtanwa, Distt-West Champaran 3. Harendra Sah S/O Sri Jagat Sah R/O Vill Sikta Belwa, P.O.Dainmarwa, P.S.Ramnagar, Distt-West Champaran 4. Uma Shankar Sah S/O Lat Jagdish Sah R/O Vill Bariarwa, P.O.Bariarwa, P.S.Choutarwa, Distt-West Champaran 5. Surendra Ram S/O Sri Sukhdeo Ram R/O Vill Tadhwandpur, P.O.Tadhwandpur, P.S.Bairia, Distt-West Champaran Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Chief Secretary State Of Bihar, Patna 3. The Secretary, Personnel And Administrative Department Govt. Of Bihar, Patna -Cum-Chairman , Three Men Committee Of Secretaries , Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 4. Principal Secretary, Department Of Water Resources Government Of Bihar, Patna 5. The Under Secretary , Water Resources Department Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 6. Engineer -In-Chief , Water Resources Department Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 7. Director ,Revenue Administration , Water Resources Department Govt.Of Bihar, Patna 8. Deputy Collector , Revenue Division , Gandak Project , Department Of Irrigation Government Of Bihar, Bettiah ----------- 3. 09.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by their respective orders passed by the three man committee declining to regularize their services after the directions of this Court to consider them in light of Paragraph-53 of the judgment of Secretary State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi (2006)4 SCC 1. The petitioners are stated to have been 2 seasonal employees whose engagement ended in the year 1988. They filed the writ applications in the years 2000/2004 in which reference came to be made on 30.11.2006 to consider claims for regularisation in light of Paragraph-53 of the judgment of the Uma Devi (supra). The judgment of Uma Devi (supra) itself holds in Paragraph-43 that persons like the petitioners do not come within the category of persons enumerated in Paragraph-53 as they were not appointed on permanent sanctioned posts but where seasonal employees. Directions of the present nature led the Supreme Court to explain in (2010) 3 SCC 115 (State of Karnataka & Ors. Vs. Ganapathi Chaya Nayak & Ors.) and (2010) 4 SCC 179 (Satya Prakash & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.) such persons do no fall in the category of persons directed to be considered for regularization as one time measure in Paragraph-53 of the judgment in Uma Devi (supra). There is no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)