^ ate BencB IN THE HON'BLB CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT AT BILASPUR M.C.C. Nq;^ ^ ? ^ of 20 10. fRelated Writ Petition (Civil) Nod378/ 2Q10'"Prabhjeet Singh Chawla Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors" dismissed for want of prosecution today on 06.12.2010]. PETITIONER: VERSUS RESPONDENTS: ^ ...^" ^ \,.-^.->?.- ^'..-•"Ay" ^.•"^'L<>'" .•l'Q2': ^ o--'y ^T3. 04^ ^" ^Prabhjeet Singh Chawla S/o Trilochan Singh Chawala, aged about 32 years, all R/o Suijeet Niwas, 3/51, Ravi Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. State of Chhattisgarh through their Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Sub Divisional Officer, Land Acqisition Officer, Raipur, Tahsil: Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Collector and Ex-officio Deputy Secretary, Revenue Department, Chhattisgarh Goyemment, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Naya Raipur Development Authority, In front of the Mahanadi Dwar, Mantralaya, Raipur - 492001, Chhattisgarh. Through: Their Chief Executive Officer. APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF WRIT PETITION (Cl No.1378/ 2010. It is most respectfully submitted as under: L,.._..., HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. N0.714 OF 2010 Petitioner Respondents Versus Prabhjeet Singh Chawla State of Chhattisgarh & Others APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OFW.P.(C) No. 1378/2010 (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Rajkamal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 08th day of December, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the counsel for the petitioner could not appear on account of bona fide mistake, therefore, W.P.(C)No.1378/2010, which was dismissed on 06.12.2010 may be restored to its file. It appears that the petition was dismissed on account of mistake of the Advocate himself. This application has been filed immediately on the next date i.e. 7.12.2010. Though, it is well settied that an appiication or petition etc. filed in the Court should not be supported by an affidavit of Advocate. However, in the facts of the case, where the mistake was on the part of the Advocate, and he has expressed regret, the above-stated requirement of filing of affidavit of the applicant/petitioner in support of the applicatjon or petition etc. is dispensed wjth. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P.(C) No. 1378/2010 is restored to the original file. A copy of this order be placed on record of the origjnal writ petition and the same be listed for hearing. —~ Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge ashok