IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 6TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 15TH BHADRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 5139 of 2010() ------------------------------------- CRL.MC. 1649/2009 OF THE SESSIONS COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CRIME NO. 601/2009 OF VENJARAMOODU POLICE STATION ........................................................................................................ PETITIONER / ACCUSED: ----------------------------------- ANAZ, S/O.ABDUL AZEEZ, MATHURA HOUSE, NEAR BISHOP HOUSE, CHANGANASSERY. BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN RESPONDENTS / COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VENJARAMMOODU POLICE STATION. 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CYBER CELL POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................. Bail Application No.5139 of 2010 ....................................................... Dated this the 6th day of September, 2010 ORDER Petitioner who is the sole accused in Crime No. 601/209 of Venjaramoodu Police Station, re-registered as crime no.7/10 of Cyber Crime Cell, Thiruvananthapuram for offences punishable under Sections 419 and 420 I.P.C. And sec.66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have his application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer on 17.09.2010 or 18.09.2010 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioner shall thereafter be produced before the Magistrate who on being satisfied that the petitioner has been interrogated by the police shall consider and dispose of his application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed. This petition is disposed of as above. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. sou.