IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9398 of 2010 1. RAMOTAR YADAV, SON OF PARMESHWARI YADAV 2. LAMBU YADAV, SON OF RAMATAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17/03/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 307, 429 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The Informant has alleged that on learning the two groups were firing against each other, he reached the place of occurrence where some persons disclosed the names of the miscreants including the present petitioners. No injury has been caused to anyone and there is only one other case pending against the petitioners i.e. Chautham P.S. Case No. 66 of 2009. In the aforesaid circumstances, let the petitioners above named, who are in custody since 4.12.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Khagaria, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 53 of 2010 arising out of Chautham P.S. Case No. 83 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform - 2 - the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)