IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1932 LA.App..No. 1101 of 2010() -------------------------- LAR.157/2007 of III ADDL.SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM .................... APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT NO.1 IN LAR: -------------- STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) KOCHI REFINERIES LTD, VYTTILA, TRIPUNITHURA BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LATHA T.THANKAPPAN RESPONDENT(S)/CLAIMANTS AND IN LAR: --------------- 1. VARKEY PATHROSE, NANIATTIL,PALAL HOUSE,KUSUMAGIRI,KAKKANAD- PIN-682030 2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, INFO PART,KUSUMAGIRI, KAKKANAD-PIN-682030 ADV. SRI.V.K.ISSAC FOR R1 SRI.K.K.APPU FOR R1 SRI.P.A.AHAMMED FOR R2 SRI.THOUFEEK AHAMED FOR R2 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------ L.A.A.No. 1101 OF 2010 ------------------------ Dated this the 25th day of February, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Even though learned senior Government Pleader Smt.Latha T.Thankappan addressed arguments based on the grounds raised in the appeal memorandum, she was fair enough to concede that when other judgments of this court such as judgment in L.A.A. No.1476/2009 (relating to acquisition of land in higher categories) are taken into account, the enhancement granted under the present judgment may be approvable. Having gone through the impugned judgment also, we feel that the Government cannot have any legitimate grievance regarding the same. For both these reasons, we dismiss the appeal, however without any order as to costs. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE dpk