IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 21ST OCTOBER 2008 / 29TH ASWINA 1930 W.P.(C).No. 30922 of 2008(F) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- BINDU N. RAJAN, H.S.A. (PHYSICAL SCIENCE), PHSS, MEZHUVELI, VALIYAKALAYIL, AKSHAYA, MEZHUVELI, PATHANAMTHITTA BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, D.E.O'S OFFICE, TIRUVALLA. 3. THE HEADMISTRESS, PADMANABHODAYAM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, MEZHUVELIL, PATHANAMTHITTA. 4. THE MANAGER, S.N. TRUSTS SCHOOLS, KOLLAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. A.J. VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 30922 OF 2008 (F) ==================== Dated this the 21st day of October, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner states that she had applied for leave without allowance from 1/7/2008. That was returned by the Manager pointing out certain defects. This was rectified and was submitted again. According to the petitioner, that is still not forwarded by the Manager to the Educational Authorities. It is therefore that the petitioner submitted Ext.P3 directly to the DEO enclosing all the documents and in this writ petition what is sought for is a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P3 in the light of Rule 58 of Chapter XIV A KER. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P3 has been received and is pending, there is no reason why the same shall not be considered. 3. Accordingly, I direct that Ext.P3 shall be taken up and considered by the 2nd respondent with notice to respondents 3 and 4. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. WPC 30922/08 :2 : 4. Though the petitioner has challenged Ext.P4, a memo alleging misconducts, for the present, I do not think I need consider the same and those contentions are left open. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp