IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2009 / 2ND ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 17358 of 2009(L) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SABANI CONSTRUCTIONS, PONNAMKULATH, KALASSERY-683 104, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SUNIL P.B., S/O. LATE E. BALANANDAN, AGED 41 YEARS. BY ADVS. MR.V.THULASEEDHARAN PILLAI, MR.E.N.VISHNU NAMBOODIRI. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE CORPORATION OF COCHIN, COCHIN, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. CORPORATION ENGINEER, CORPORATION OF COCHIN ,KOCHI-11. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 & R2 BY ADV. MR. S.RAMESH BABU, SC, COCHIN CORPN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.17358 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT The purchase orders relied on by the petitioner were issued to P.B.Sunil and is not in favour of Sabani Constructions which is the petitioner herein. The petitioner is described as Sabani Constructions represented by its Managing Director P.B.Sunil and paragraph 1 of the writ petition states that the petitioner is a firm. I do not find any firm Sabani Constructions which can make any claim on the basis of Ext.P1 which shows that it is only in favour of P.B.Sunil. Without prejudice to P.B.Sunil seeking any relief in accordance with law, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.23/6.