^ BEFORE HON'BLE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.A. . ./2008 fD.B. APPELLANT / Petitioner^ ' P. N. Verma aged about 64 years, S/o Shri A. R. Verma( (since retired ) now R/o Kanhaiya Bada, ward no.—6, Tilda , Distt. Raipur, [ C G ] VERS U S RESPONDENTS : /l. M.P. Electricity Board, through Secretary, Sakti Nagar, Rampur, ? .^.€/ ^^/ <^ /'^''^»y ' •..••f<^<e9>"' -^:^ ^ ->.-" ..^' V. ^ -^ -ay P.0. Jaba;lpur, [ M.P. ] 2. Shri S. P. Sinha, Assistant Engineer,Through the Secretary, M.P. Electricity Board , Rampur, Jabalpur, | M.P. ] ^3. Chhattisgarh Electricity Board, Through Secretary, Danganiya, P.0. & Distt. Raipur. [ C G ] WRIT J8F APPEAL UNDER SECTION—2 (1) CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT [ APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH ] ACT, 2006 OF B: !,M. Writ No. 188 APPELLANT Versys P.N. M,P. others. Shrl for the Shri Yogesh Pandey, for No. 1 & 3. ^T, "^. ^. (1)Thls wrft has 14-06-2£K)8 by the In W.P. No. the »wlt (2) The i.wlt as the j.e. In the 1967. a rule that a for on The on the writ his at but hte by the The for' to the of on the of -CL- We perused the records which first of atl the wrft appellant was m January, 1984 by the Setectson Committee the through ACRs of Sast and up to 1983. At that the writ was not found flt for the of (T&D). Thereafter, aga'sn In the 1987, the Selectlon of (Gen), MemteF (C&D), Secretary, Chief (O&M), Add'rtlonal and Secretany (P)-{ met l.e. June 1987 and 15-08-87 CGmmlttee the of Sast five years l.e. 1983 to March 1987 and of Jun'sor Ip.clucSlng that of the writ as as for promotion. Out of two were found fit for thelr were S.K. Gupta and L.P. rest two nameiy K.M. Goya! and writ not found frt. Thereafter 'm the of 1988 he 35 the CRs for $ast flve jp. 1988, but not selected. Thereafter, thelr In 1989 and onty 9 Junior and remaining 27 the wrlt not Lastly, the case of the wrlt IncSudlng In the he found fst and and -3- ^ (5) Leamed coynset for the writ ha®subm'rtteci that the Single has hls that the wrlt appellant had not the option, but we have that though he has hfe optiors at the but hls case was considered rlght from 1984 by each and every Selection Committee, but he p.ot fouod fit and he could be found fft for promotlon w.e.f. 01-04-1^0 vlde 29-06-1991. (6) Since the for / was merlt-cunn-suitablllty and Committee found the other the writ appellant, therefore the writ appellant, who to them, could not be and the be as an tllegatity. (7) Therefore, we do not flnd any to wlth the impugneci order by the Judgs. (8) The writ Is and Is therefore dismlssed. SdA ^.M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge