1 Criminal Application No.100/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.100 OF 2011 Shivaji s/o Raghunath Nagargoje ... APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT ..... Shri B.R. Warma, Advocate for the applicant Shri K.M. Suryawanshi, A.P.P. for respondent ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 28th January, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard. The accused/ applicant, in custody from 13.12.2010 in Crime No.202/2009, of Parli Rural Police Station, District Beed, for an offence under Sections 302, 201 of the Indian Penal Code, seeks to be released on bail. 2. The applicant was not driver of the vehicle, but it was Nagnath, who drove the vehicle, crushed three persons who were with the accused/ applicant Shivaji. The first statement of the accused/ applicant misled the case. In the supplementary statement dated 20.12.2009, he narrated the correct events how the principal 2 Criminal Application No.100/2011 accused Nagnath carried the jeep and crushed the associates of the accused/ applicant. The present accused/ applicant did not inform the events in tune as has happened and hence, suffers prosecution in terms of Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Supplementary charge sheet is filed on 20.12.2010. There is nothing that the accused/ applicant has threatened any of the witness or created such a situation, to cause disappearance of the evidence. Accused/ applicant holds immovable property, even if he is working as a Driver at Mumbai. Hence the order: O R D E R 3. The accused/ applicant Shivaji s/o Raghunath Nagargoje be released on his furnishing P.R. bond and surety in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand). The accused/applicant, after his release, shall attend the investigator on every Sunday between 3.00 p.m. to 5.00 p.m. up to 31st May 2011. The accused/ applicant shall not influence the witnesses and also scrupulously attend the Court proceedings. Application allowed. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cri100.11