HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN W.P.No.24071 of 1997 Date: 13.02.2007 Between: R. Venkateswarlu, S/o Ramaiah …. Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, reptd by its Secretary, Woman and Child Welfare, Secretariat, Hyderabad and 3 others …. Respondents ORDER: The petitioner seeks regularization of his services in terms of G.O.Ms.No.212 Finance and Planning (FW.PC.III) Department, dated 22.4.1994. The petitioner was appointed on 30.1.1992 as attender and by the time G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.4.1994 came into force, he hardly put in service of one year and 10 months and had not complied with the conditions stipulated in G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.4.1994. While the submission of Sri K. Vinaykumar, learned counsel for the petitioner is that though the petitioner was appointed in regular selections, he was paid consolidated salary, the learned standing counsel for the respondents placed reliance on the averments in the counter affidavit to submit that the petitioner had not fulfilled the requirements stipulated in G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.4.1994. Since the petitioner has not complied with the conditions stipulated therein, he is not entitled to claim any regularization under G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.4.1994. In any event, as has been held in Secretary, State of Karnataka and others V. Umadevi (3) and others[1], no right accrues in favour of an employee appointed on daily wage/consolidated pay/temporary basis to claim regularization of his services as a matter of right. Hence, the writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J Date: 13th February 2007 Ksn [1] 2006(4) SCC 1