IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 31 OF 2008 MR. RONNY JOAQUIM RODRIGUES ... Appellant Versus MR. ROMEU FRANCISCO ALMEIDA AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Anthony D'Silva, Advocate for the Appellant. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 18th September, 2008 P.C.:- Heard Mr. Anthony D'Silva, learned Counsel on behalf of the Appellant, who was the Plaintiff in Special Civil Suit No. 35/2006/B and whose application for temporary injunction has been rejected by the trial Court by Order dated 7-1-2008. Apparently, there was an agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants for sale of a property. The agreement was dated 7-7-2005 and the purchase price was fixed at Rs.8,50,000/-. At the time of execution of agreement a sum of Rs.1,10,000/- was paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendants. The said agreement has been terminated by the Defendants by Order dated 11-2-2006. The Plaintiff has not sought for any specific performance of the agreement. Mr. D'Silva, learned Counsel on behalf of the Plaintiff has submitted that after filing of the suit the property, the subject matter of the agreement has been sold. All that the Plaintiff seeks now is a refund of the amount of Rs.1,10,000/- paid by him to the Defendants at the time of the execution. Reliance was placed, and, is also placed before this Court on Videocon Properties Ltd. v. Dr. Bhalchandra Laboratories and others(AIR 2004 SC 1787) which in the opinion of the learned trial Court, did not apply to the facts of the case. The learned trial Court has concluded that the Plaintiff's relief by way of application for temporary injunction was only to recover the said amount of Rs.1,10,000/- with interest at 18%. Obviously, such a relief could not be granted by way of temporary injunction. There is no merit in this appeal and accordingly the same is hereby dismissed. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.