IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 20837 of 2008 Between: Atmakuri Sudhakar Rao, S/o. A.Lakshmaiah, R/o. Kavali Bit-II, Kavali Town, Nellore District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Nellore District at Nellore, 2 Kavali Municipality, kavali, Nellore District, Rep by its Commissioner, 3 The Tahasildar, Kavali Mandal, Nellore District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction of the 2nd respondent in trying to lay a C.C. road in to the petitioners land bearing Plot No.472 situated in sy.No.2048/B of Kavali Bit-II, Kavali Town, Nellore District, without following any procedure known to law as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and violation of plan, and consequently direct the respondents to forbear the proposed action of the respondents in laying CC Road into the petitioner's land. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER This writ petition has been ﬁled by Atmakuri Sudhakar Rao assailing the action of the Kavali Municipality, Kavali-2 nd respondent in trying to lay CC road in his land bearing plot No.472 situated in Sy. No.2048/B of Kavali Bit-II, Kavali Town, Nellore District, without following the due process of law. The petitioner claims to be owner of plot 472 admeasuring Ac.0-02 cents situated in Sy. No.2048/B o f Kavali Bit-II, Kavali Town vide proceedings dated 20.6.1993 issued by the Mandal Revenue Oﬃcer, Kavali. The petitioner constructed a house on the plot assigned to him. The 2nd respondent is allegedly trying to lay CC road through the plot assigned to him without following due process of law. Hence, this writ petition. When the writ petition came up for admission, leanred Government Pleader for Revenue received notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 3 and Sri S.Nageswar Reddy, learned standing counsel for Kavali Municipality received notice on behalf of R2. Learned standing counsel for Kavali Municipality appearing on behalf of R2 submits that 2nd respondent will follow due process of law in the event of road being laid in the house plot assigned to the petitioner. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to follow due process of law in the even of road being laid in the house plot assigned to the petitioner. No costs. __________ 24-09-2008 Note: Issue CC by three days. (B.O) rkk