S.B.Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 7440 of 2009 Mahendra vs. State of Raj. ---- 30.9.2009 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA Mr. Hridayesh Singh for the petitioner. Mr. G.S.Faujdar, Public Prosecutor. --- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. The learned counsel for the accused petitioner contended that after granting bail the petitioner did not misuse the bail, since his father had become diabetic he had to leave Kota for treatment of his father and during the treatment his father died due to which he lost his mental status and went into depression and did not appear before the trial court on each date of proceedings. The trial court declared him absconding since January 21, 2009 and issued standing warrant of arrest. The accused petitioner is in judicial lock up from July 25, 2009. The trial will take time. The Public Prosecutor opposed this argument. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the accused petitioner Mahendra son of Hariram shall be released on bail provided he shall submit bail bond in the amount of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties in the amount of Rs. 12,500/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance before the trial court on all dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so. The accused petitioner shall deposit the whole amount of surety before the trial court before releasing from custody. (Mahesh Chandra Sharma) J. OPPareek/