IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11939 of 2011 Sita Ram Singh, Son of Late Pradip Narayan Singh, Resident of Village – Kamalpura, P.S.- Paroo, District – Muzaffarpur. ------------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Director Consolidation Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Consolidation Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur. 4. District Provident Fund Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur. --------- Respondents ----------- 2 25.07.2011 Heard Sri Bhavesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Lala S.N. Rais, learned AC to GP No. 6, who appears on behalf of all the respondents/State. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 30.06.2002 as ‘Amin’ from Vaishali Circle has prayed for directing the respondents particularly respondent no. 4/District Provident Fund Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur, to make payment of entire amount of G.P.F. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that under the head of G.P.F. petitioner has received only Rs. 13,000/-. The petitioner has further prayed for directing the respondents to provide statement showing deduction of the G.P.F. amount. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file representation before respondent no. 4. The prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner has not been opposed by learned counsel for the State. In view of facts and circumstances with the consent of the parties the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the 2 petitioner to file a detailed representation before respondent no. 4 within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no. 4 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no.4 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine he is required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, respondent no. 4 is required to pass speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within aforesaid time. The respondent no. 4 is further directed to provide the statement showing deduction of G.P.F. amount within aforesaid time. The writ petition stands disposed of. The respondent no. 4 may also examine the claim of statutory interest on delayed payment. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)