:1: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO. 11 OF 2007 NO. 11 OF 2007 NO. 11 OF 2007 IN IN IN COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY APPLICATION NO.100 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.100 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.100 OF 2007 Bajaj Sevashram Pvt.Ltd. ... Appellant. (Org.Respondent 1) V/s. Shishir Bajaj & Ors. ... Respondents. (Org. Petitioners.) And Jamnalal Sons Pvt.Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents. (Org.Respondents 2 to 34) .... Mr. S.D. Parekh i/b. M/s. Malvi Ranchoddas & Co. for the Appellants. Mr. R.A. Dada, Mr. F.E. Devitre, Mr. D.J. Khambata with Mr. Venkatesh Dhond and J.P. Sen i/b. M/s. Federal and Rashmikant for Respondents 1 to 4. Mr. S.H. Doctor i/b. M/s. Pandya Gandhi for Respondents 5,7,8,9,11,12,13 and 14. Mr. Janak Dwarkadas i/b. Kalpesh Nansi for Respondents 29 to 31. Mr. Shyam Mehta i/b. Gopal K. Shah for Respondents 15 to 22, 26, 28, 32 and 34. Mr. Dharmesh Joshi for Respondents 27, 33 35, 36 and 37. .... :2: CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. 12th 12th 12th April 2007. April 2007. April 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . At the hearing of the Appeal, the Court has been informed by Counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting parties that it is not necessary for the Court to enquire into the correctness of the order passed by the Company Law Board since the parties have arrived at a working arrangement which is reflected in the consent minutes of the order tendered before the Court. The consent minutes signed by the respective Advocates are taken on record and marked as "X". 2. The Company Appeal shall accordingly disposed of in terms thereof. -----