IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH AUGUST 2011 / 26TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22308 of 2011(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. NEERAJ VIJAY, ANASWARA HOUSE, NEAR FACT MARKET, UDYOGAMANDAL, ELOOR EAST, ERNAKULAM. 2. C.DIVYA CHANDRA SHEKARA SARAL, 3C, RB-GREEN LEAVES, ALTHARA, GCDA ROAD, THOTTAKKATTUKARA, ALUVA. BY ADV. SRI.FEBIN J.VELUKARAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, PIN-686 560. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM-686 560. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.22308/11 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE MARKLISTS ISSUED TO THE 1ST PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P1(a): TRUE COPY of THE MARKLISTS ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 30/6/11 PREFERRED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT AND THE CHALLAN REMITTING THE FEE THEREIN. EXT.P2(a): TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 20.6.11 PREFERRED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT AND THE CHALLAN REMITTING THE FEE THEREIN. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 22308 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 17th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are M.B.A students. When the result of the 2nd Semester examination was declared, 1st petitioner failed in Operations Management, Research Methodology, Management Information Systems and Management Sciences and the 2nd petitioner failed in Environment Management, Research Methodology and Management Sciences. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp