IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2395 of 2009 RAMESHWAR CHAUBEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 24/2/2009 Heard counsel for the parties. Mr. V. Nath, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned consented decree passed by the Lok Adalat some how is going to affect title of the petitioner pertaining to land purchased by his ancestor in the year 1954 and therefore it would be in the fitness of thing that such compromise decree passed by the Lok Adalat, in which he was not even made a party, should be set aside by this Court in exercise of power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In the opinion of this Court this prayer of the petitioner is wholly misconceived, in as much as, if title of the petitioner is sought to be affected by any action including by order of the Lok Adalat, it is always open for him to seek appropriate relief by filing a title suit. That being so, this application being wholly misconceived is hereby 2 dismissed with the aforementioned observation. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar