IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 7025 of 2008 Between: D. Nageshwar Rao S/o D. Satyam R/o 3-32, Chilaka Nagar, Uppal, Ranga Reddy District ..... PETITIONER AND The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, R.R. District, East At Uppal, R.R. District .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declarign the action of the respondent in not considering the petitioenr represenation dated 18-2- 2008 for conversion of his maxicab vehicle AP 28B2105 into Omini Bus (Private Vehicle) as illegal, arbtirary and contrary to the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 and the Rules made there under and consequently direct the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner for conversion of his maxi cab vehicle to Omini Bus (Private Vehicle) and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper inthe circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.CH.RAVINDER Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR TRANSPORT The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 7025 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 18.2.2008 for conversion of his maxi cab vehicle bearing registration No. AP 28 B 2105 into Omni Bus (private vehicle) as illegal and arbitrary. The case of the petitioner is that he is owner of maxi cab (LMV) bearing registration No. AP 28 B 2105 with a valid permit to operate the same as maxi cab. The petitioner for his personal reasons wants to convert it as personal/private vehicle and submitted a representation dated 18.2.2008 and since no further action in the matter is taken, filed the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Transport. Both counsel agreed for disposal of the writ petition at the admission stage. Since the representation of the petitioner dated 18.2.2008 is pending and in view of the agreed stand taken by both the counsel, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ____________ N.V.RAMANA,J DATE: 1.4.2008 TVK ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 7025 of 2008 DATE: 1.4.2008