IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2553/2011 Date of decision: 20.04.2011. Smt.Narbada ....................Petitioner v. Ravi Yadav and others .....................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Mr.Arun Yadav,Advocate for the petitioner. Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral) Defendant/petitioner has invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution assailing the order dated 22.2.2011 (P1) whereby the learned trial court has directed the bank employee appearing as DW1 to bring the entire summoned record during the conducting of his cross examination. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that whole approach of the learned trial court is erroneous as if any documents are required to be produced the same have to be summoned by the plaintiff in his own evidence at the rebuttal stage. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the pleadings, I am not persuaded to accept the contention raised on behalf of the petitioner. It is apparent that the official witness- a bank employee was summoned to depose on the basis of summoned record and during his cross examination by the counsel for the plaintiff it was noticed that the entire summoned record had not been brought by him. Accordingly, the Court exercising its discretionary powers had directed the official witness to bring the entire summoned record. In my opinion, this approach of the learned trial court cannot be faulted at all as the rules of procedure are to be used to advance the cause of justice and not to obstruct the same. Dismissed. 20.04.2011 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge