..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4007 OF 2007 Shri Nitesh Jayantilal Jain and Anr. ..Applicants. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Meghashyam Kocharekar, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr.Ashish Sawant, Adv. for Respondent No.2. Ms.A.T.Jhaveri, APP, for Respondent No.1-State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : JANUARY 18, 2008. DATED : JANUARY 18, 2008. DATED : JANUARY 18, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants-orig.accused, the learned Advocate for respondent No.2-orig.complainant, the learned APP for the State and the original complainant who is present in Court. 2. Respondent No.2-orig.complainant had filed a private complaint against the applicants. The said complaint falls under Section 420, 406, 506(ii) read with 34 of IPC. In the said complaint the learned Magistrate issued orders ..(2).. under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.. The said case is numbered as C.C.No.700/PW/2005. Initially the case was pending before the learned M.M., 6th Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai. However, at present the case is pending before the learned M.M., 15th Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai. Charge-sheet has been filed by the police in the said case. The applicants have filed the present application for quashing of the said case. It is stated that the applicants and the orig.complainant have amicably settled the matter amongst themselves. The complainant who is present in Court also states that the dispute has been amicably settled between the parties and he does not wish to proceed against the present applicants. 3. In this view of the matter, in my opinion, no purpose would be served by continuing with the above said case. Hence, C.C. No.700/PW/2005 pending before the learned M.M., 15th Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai is quashed. 4. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. ..(3).. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)