IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 395 OF 2008 SMT. VIJAYA NAIQUE ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. GURUDAS NAIQUE AND 16 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. D. J. Pangam, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R. Menezes, Advocate for the respondent no.1. Mr. K. G. Khandeparkar, Advocate for the respondent no.2. Mr. R. G. Ramani, Advocate for the respondent no.3 to 17. Coram:- SMT. R. S. DALVI, J. Date:- 15th April, 2009 P.C. The petitioner has initially filed the suit claiming ownership right. Learned Trial Judge has considered the prima face case of ownership. He has considered that absolutely no documentary evidence to show her ownership right is produced. Form I&XIV has also not been produced. Inventory proceedings in respect of the estate of her father were filed by respondent no.1, her brother and in which, her brother sought to drop the suit property. The order in the inventory proceedings has considered the suit filed by the petitioner. The inventory proceedings have not been dropped in view of this suit. In the suit, the petitioner's prima facie right, title and interest has been considered by the Trial Court. The Appeal Court has once again considered such prima facie case and the fact of earlier litigation including earlier suit filed by the petitioner herself. 2. The respondents have been declared owners in Regular Civil Appeal No.118/1999. Thereafter, the ownership has changed and the development of the suit property has commenced. Each of the aspects of the case is considered. There is no merit in the writ petition. Writ petition is dismissed. SMT. R. S. DALVI, J. lh/.