IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION NO.26 OF 2005 PETITION NO.26 OF 2005 PETITION NO.26 OF 2005 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.6521 OF 2004 PETITION NO.6521 OF 2004 PETITION NO.6521 OF 2004 Shri Shantaram Sadashiv Patil..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors..Respondents Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar, for the Petitioner Mr. R.D. Rane, AGP for Respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 18th March, 2005 : 18th March, 2005 : 18th March, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The petitioner has been unable to show any error apparent on the face of the record. The petition was dismissed specifically on the ground that the petitioner was unable to produce any documentary evidence showing that he is freedom fighter. Considering that no interference called for. Review Petition rejected. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (S.P. (S.P. (S.P. KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.)