1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3645 OF 2009 Pintu Pundlik Marathe and others APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and another RESPONDENTS Mr.P.B.Pawar, learned counsel for the applicants. Mr.N.B.Patil, learned APP for respondents. (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 13/11/2009 PER COURT : 1. By the present application, the applicants have prayed and approached this Court for their release on anticipatory bail in case of their arrest in CR No.111/2009, registered in Dondaicha Police Station, Tal.Sindkheda, Dist. Dhule for alleged offence punishable u/s. 395, 452, 427, 143, 147, 148, 149, 504, 506 of IPC and u/s. 37(1)(3) of 135 of Bombay Police Act. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for applicants followed by learned APP appearing for State. As notice of the application was already served on learned APP, papers of investigation till carried out 2 are placed in my hand for my perusal. 3. Contents of the complaint on the basis of which an offence vide CR No.111/2009 was registered discloses that on account of some eye teasing by one of the employee working in the bakery of the complainant, some quarrel took place in the morning sessions on 28/09/2009. It appears that in the evening, the relatives of that girl alongwith these applicants attacked on the bakery of the complainant and caused damage to the articles in the bakery and also cash in the sum of Rs.10,000 to 12,000/- was forcibly removed from the cash box. Perusal of the papers of the investigation indicates that the incident was witnessed by number of people who have also stated that these 3 applicants were amongst the other which forcibly attacked on the shop of the complainant, damaged articles in the shop and also took out some cash from the cash box in the said shop. This nature of the allegations against the applicants discloses not only from the complaint but also from the statements recorded during the investigation which shows the seriousness of the offence committed at the hands of these applicants and if it is so, this is not a fit case to use the discretion of this Court to release the applicants on anticipatory bail. Application sans any merit and stands disposed of as rejected. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/NOV 2009/cri.appl.3645-09