IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2008 / 6TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 9360 of 2008(L) ------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED / / IN IA. 407/08 IN LAR.1/1992 of SUB COURT, PAYYANNUR .................... PETITIONER: ------------ THALAYILLATH KADEEJA D/O.ABDULKADER HAJI, NORTH THRIKARIPUR HOSDURG. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.AMARESAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. SUB COLLECTOR AND LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, THALASSERY. 2. DEPARTMENT OF POSTS, REPRESENTED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POSTS, CANNANORE DIVISION CANNANORE. BY SMT. R.BINDU, GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, ASST.S.G. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J ===================== W.P.(C) No.9360 OF 2008 ===================== Dated this the 26th day of March 2008 JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed against the order of the Sub Judge, Payyannur whereby he has dismissed I.A.No.407 of 2005. It was an application for amendment of the decreetal portion of the judgment and decree. The prayer in the application is to direct the court to award 12% interest on the additional compensation of Rs.4,82,511/-, 30% solatium and further interest of 9%. Now it is very clear from the award Ext.P1 what is awarded. If there is any grievance for the petitioner, her remedy is to prefer an appeal against the judgment and decree and the decree cannot be amended. The amendment of the decree only envisages a situation especially before the pronouncement of the entitlement as per Sunder's case. It has been pronounced on 19.9.2001 and the present judgment is rendered only on 31.10.2003. So when the court has declined it is a matter which has to be challenged in the appropriate forum so as to enable her to get the relief if the law permits. This cannot be corrected under Section 152 C.P.C for the reason that it is neither a clerical or arithmetical mistake or an WP(C) 9360/2008 -:2:- omission. Leaving open the right of the party to move for the appropriate relief in the appropriate forum the writ petition is dismissed. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE Cdp/-