IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Stay Application No.4506 of 2010 In Writ Petition No. 929 of 2010 (M/S) Km. Shivani Rani. ……Petitioner Versus Union of India and others. …….Respondents. Smt. Sanjana Madan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.S. Rawal, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Mr. Gopal Narain, Advocate for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel of the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of mandamus to the respondents to re-evaluate the answer copies of the Class-XII-C (Comm.) Session 2009-2010 bearing Roll No. 5786810, of all the subject of the petitioner. There is no provision in the Rules to re-evaluate the answer copies. No such mandamus can be issued. However, the liberty is given to the petitioner to apply for scrutiny of the answer copies in accordance with Rules. With the above observation, the writ petition is dismissed. Interim relief application stands disposed of accordingly. (B.S.Verma, J.) 15-06-2010 MK