IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 22ND MARCH 2010 / 1ST CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 7536 of 2010(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- BALABADRAN,K.A., KUNNAMKATTIL HOUSE, THENKURISSI, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN SMT.RUKHIYABI MOHD KUNHI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PALAKKAD. 2. THE SECRETARY, PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY, PALAKKAD. 3. SIVALINGAPPA GOWDA, S/O.ANANDARAMA GOWDA, PATHAYAM, CHULLIMADA, KANJIKODE, PALAKKAD. 4. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY, PALAKKAD. ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON FOR R1 SRI.JIBU P THOMAS FOR R1 SRI.P.S.APPU FOR R1 SRI.A.R.NIMOD FOR R1 SRI.C.A.ANOOP FOR R1 SC FOR UNIVERSITY SRI. V. CHITAMBARESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.7536 OF 2010 (N) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submitted Ext.P2 application to the respondent Municipality for the issuance of a location sketch, for which necessary fee also has been remitted. However, his application was rejected by Ext.P3 order, citing pendency of O.S.No.670/2009 as the reason. However, petitioner submits that the suit pending was O.S.No.670/06 and that the same was dismissed by Ext.P1 judgment rendered by the Munsiff's court, Palakkad, which was confirmed by the appellate court by dismissing A.S.No.170/2009 on 25.2.2010. Petitioner therefore submits that the reason stated in Ext.P3 order is totally incorrect. 2. I heard the standing counsel appearing for the respondent also. 3. Now that the petitioner has documents to show that the reason stated in Ext.P3 is incorrect, I direct the petitioner to produce copies of the judgment in the suit and in the appeal referred above before the respondent Municipality and on such production Municipality shall immediately reconsider the WPC.No. 7536/2010 :2 : application and pass fresh orders in the matter, in the light of the documents so produced. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/