IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2008 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1930 RP.No. 607 of 2008(B) --------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT ---------------------- INDU.I.P, AGED 39, W/O. SATHEESH, LAKSHMI MANDIRAM, HMT COLONY.P.O, KALAMASSERY, THRIKKAKARA NORTH VILLAGE, NOW RESIDING AT NANDHIKESH, SHENOY ROAD, KALOOR.P.O, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.KURUVILLA JACOB RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT/PETITIONER ------------------ O.V. PRASANNA, AGED 41, S/O. VELAPPAN, ONAKKAVIL HOUSE, MULANTHURUTHY.P.O, MULANTHURUTHY, ERNAKULAM. BY THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. ------------------------------- R.P.No.607 of 2008 in W.P.(C) No.13460/2008 ------------------------------- Dated this the 13th June, 2008. O R D E R This petition is filed by the respondent in W.P.(C) No.13460 of 2008 to review the judgment dated 23.5.2008, on the ground that respondent herein, the petitioner in the writ petition, suppressed Annexure A2 agreement and if that agreement was available, this Court would not have set aside the order. 2. On hearing the learned counsel and on going through the petition, I do not find any reason to review the judgment. Under the judgment sought to be reviewed, learned Sub Judge was directed to dispose I.A.No.2190 of 2008 on merits, after hearing both parties. In such circumstances, it is for the petitioner to raise all his contentions before the learned Sub Judge. There is no apparent error or other sufficient reasons to review the judgment. Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to canvass the grounds taken herein, in the application pending before the Sub Court. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE nj.