IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 11143 of 2006 Between: Bathula Srinivas Rao S/o.Nasaraiah R/o.11/2, Srinivasarao Peta Opp: Tobacco Board, (NH-5), Guntur-4. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Law (Legal Affairs) Dept., 2 The Collector & District Magistrate, Guntur, Guntur District. 3 The Director of Prosecutions, Hyderabad. 4 V.V.Chalapathi Rao, Additional Public Prosecutor, Grade-II, .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings Rc.No.587/B1/2006, dt.25.5.2006 issued by the 3rd respondent herein as wholly illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and opposed to the principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent to continue the petitioner as Additional Public Prosecutor in II Additional District and Sessions Judge's Court, Guntur till regular appointments are made pass such further other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case.” At the hearing, Sri G.Ravi Mohan, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that in view of appointment of the Additional Public Prosecutor on permanent basis, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.13854 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 8th June, 2008 LUR