CRM No.M-31241 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:-19.11.2010 Ajmer son of Ram Diya ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present:- Mr.U.K.Agnihotri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Tarun Aggarwal, Senior D.A.G. Haryana. M ehinder S ingh S ullar , J . (Oral) Invoking the provisions of section 439 Cr.PC, petitioner Ajmer son of Ram Diya, has directed the present petition for regular bail in a case registered against him alongwith his other co-accused, namely, Mam Raj, vide FIR No.82 dated 23.4.2010, on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, by the police of Police Station Baroda, Distt.Sonepat. 2. Notice of the petition was issued to the State. 3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with their valuable help and after considering the matter deeply, to my mind, the present petition deserves to be accepted in this behalf. 4. What is not disputed here is that all the offences alleged against the petitioner are triable by the Court of Magistrate. The learned counsel has stated at the bar that the petitioner is a first offender, is not involved in any other criminal case and only challan has been presented against him. As even charges have not yet been framed against the accused, therefore, the conclusion of trial will naturally take long time. The petitioner was arrested on 20.9.2010 and since then CRM No.M-31241 of 2010 2 he is in judicial custody. No useful purpose would be served to further detain him in jail. Moreover, there is no history of previous involvement of the petitioner in any such case. 6. So, taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances, emanating from the record, as indicated here-in-above, without commenting further anything on merits, lest it may prejudice the case of either side during the course of the trial of the case, to me, the present petitioner is entitled to regular bail in the obtaining circumstances of the instant case. 7. In the light of the aforesaid reasons, the present petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court. 8. The instant petition is disposed of accordingly. 19.11.2010 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) AS Judge