IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 19872 of 2005 Between: M.Balram S/o. Late Agamaiah R/o. 2-1-390, New Gandhinagar Nallakunta (Lanka) Hyderabad-14. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh Rep.by its Secrertary, Revenue Administration Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad. 2 The Collector, Hyderabad District Nampally Hyderabad. 3 Mandal Revenue Officer Himayathnagar Mandal VST Road, Musheerabad Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.KISHORE RAI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition itself is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. Heard Sri Kishore Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition is that application, dated 15.12.2004 for regularisation of his occupation of 110 sq.yards of land in R.S.No.27 in T.S.No.8 in Ward No.186, Block F, Baghlingampally Village of Himayathnagar Mandal, Hyderabad District, is not being considered in pursuance of G.O.Ms.No.515, dated 19.04.2003. At the hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after filing of the writ petition, the State Government issued G.O.Ms.No.166, dated 16.02.2008 superceding the earlier G.Os including G.O.Ms.No.515, dated 19.04.2003. He, therefore, submits that in view of this development, the writ petition may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to make fresh application under the said G.O. with appropriate directions to the respondents to consider and dispose of the same. Since the request of the learned counsel is found reasonable, the writ petition is disposed of. The petitioner is permitted to make an application under G.O.Ms.No.166, dated 16.02.2008 and on such filing, respondent No.2 is directed to consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.25267 of 2005 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 27th June, 2008. kvni