IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23839 of 2008 RAJESHWAR MAHTO @ RAMESHWAR MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 1.7.2008 Heard. The case appears of suspicion as regards the involvement of the petitioner in the offence under Section 395 of the IPC and the rejection order itself indicates that none of the witnesses were willing to attend the test identification. The petitioner is in custody and nothing has been recovered from his possession. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing P.R.bond of Rs.500/-(five hundred) without any surety to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M. Sherghati in Amas P.S.Case no.123 of 2004. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )