iJMftl K ^ 73 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) WRIT PETITION (S) N0.68<"~'P /2006 PETITIONER Duran Singh Uraon, aged about 37 years, son of Shri Budlu Ram Uraon, Upper Division Teacher (Head Master), Government Middle School Dabhra, Vikash Khand Baramkela, District Raigarh (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS .***' ^f^ i^l^ ^^^ '^ ...•••••""' ^1. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Lokshikshan Evam Sanchalnalay, Raipur, (C.G.) The District Education Officer, Education District Raigarh (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE.226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, ^ XI-HC-78 Wq<<fTSb*11<t> 3^:3iraRTO, aTTlu'is, facii'My , .^•P.($-?^o.6^/°^ ^ ^;...'.. .\ r. .<„::.... ^200 341^1 M^* ('!?^3^?') an^r^rR.ii'b gsir aii^i stiii» & S^ITWflfStTSn^T 11.12.2006 ShriA.N. Bhakta, leamed c Shri Ajay Dwivedi, leamed Heard. By this petition under Arti^ India, the petitioner seeks a dire<tt increments and seniority on th^ appointment in the light of the dedt Administrative Tribunal, Jaba!p|ur 1452/1998 (Harish Chandra Singj others)dated 31.1.2000 2. Learned counsel appearing) copy of the order dated 9-11-2( Petition (S) No. 5473Q006 (Ral^ Chhattisgarh and others) and o< 1890/2003 (Chhattisgarh Shikcha|i and others) and submits that t| therefore, the simiiar order may be| 3. The case of the petitioner is] Teacher in the School Education of two years with the fixed salary. oftwo years' probation, the petitior given the regular pay scale from Other similarty situated teachersl Tribunal, Jabalpur for regular pay-s «bi'iif<'i''fl-itiitidTftTs'^ <Ritei<. ^3Tf^T3:n^T unsel for the petitioner. .L. for the State/respondents. tos 226/227 of the Constituiion of i<ttion to the respondents to pay the basis of the date of his iniUal ijsion rendered by the leamed State in Original Application No. and others Vs. State of M.P. and for the petitioner piaced on record )06 passed by this Court in Writ {esh Kumar Sharma Vs. State of tder dated 6-4-2005 in W.P. No. |< Sangh -v State of Chhattisgarh ^e petitioner is similariy situated, Ipassed. ]that he was appointed as Assistant G|epartment on probation for a period however, later on, after comptetion (er was regutarized but, he was not |he date of his initial appointment. moved the State Administrative s|cale, wherein ieamed Tribunai vkie P.T.O. XI-HC-78 *11+1MI sh*1ich TSf -^M\v\^, siTn^'ie, Iqs-iiuy ^.y?.:"p.....^8^ 311^1 4sl* ('iflt^'t'T) an^Twfs-iR; (WT 311^1 a>ii«t> CT<nw:af^T3n^?r repres^ntafion dnd oftllie order dated 31.1.2000 allowed th^ representetions to accord the samfc situated, but, the respondents h4' petition. 4. Learned counsel for the p< may be aliowed to make a simiiar treatment to the petitioner E|| sanctioned to other similariy situat< of the State AdministraUve Tribunsll counset for the respondents/State 5. Having heard leamed coun^ to the facts and circum^ances the limited prayer made by leame< to be reasonable. Therefore, th^ represeniation virithin a period of h< No.1, raising all his grievances a) decide Ihe said representation in of 30 days from the date of reej considering all the points raised account the order dated 31.1.2Q Administrative Tribunal in Originai 6. The writ petition is accordir direction. No order as to costs. 7. Certified copy as per rules. 4ii'iifci41-f tiit<dTffte<^t<l»itdi< ^3ri^iT3n^r same. The petitioner made several treatment as he was also similarly ve not paid any heed. Thus, this ititioner submits that the petHioner to respondent No.1 to give same pay-scale which has been sd ieachers on account of the order dated 31.1.2000, to which iearned las no objecUon. .el for the parties and having regard case, in the opinion of this Court, counsel fw the petitioner appears petitioner is aiiowed to make a roweete from today to respondent I, in turn, respondent No.1 shail \n objeciive manner within a period |eipt of such representatlon, after |by the peBtioner and tata'ng into passed by ttie leamed State Ikpplication No. 1452/1998. Igly disposed of wtth the aforesald Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge abd 20100 P.T.O.