IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT MONDAY, THE 8TH OCTOBER 2007 / 16TH ASWINA 1929 Bail Appl..No. 6056 of 2007() ----------------------------- OS.1107/2007 of PRL.M.C.,ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED ------------------------------------ 1. RAPHEAL,S/O.RAPHEAL,KARUKAYIL HOUSE THYKOODAM,VYTTILA P.O.ERNAKULAM. 2. EDWIN,S/O. RAPHEAL,KARUKAYIL HOUSE THYKOODAM,VYTTILA P.O.ERNAKULAM. 3. ALBERT,S/O.RAPHEAL, KARUKAYIL HOUSE,THYKOODAM,VYTTILA P.O.ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER GEORGE SRI.DILIP MOHAN RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT/STATE ------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. 2. STATION HOUSE OFFICER PANANGAD POLICE STATION PANANGAD. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.S.U. NAZAR. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT, J. ------------------------------------------------- B.A. No. 6056 OF 2007 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of October, 2007 ORDER Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioners are the father-in-law and brothers-in-law of the de facto complainant. The husband of the de facto complainant is no more. She asserts that she has rights in the family property and right of residence there. The petitioners apprehend that they may be arrested on the allegation of having committed non-bailable offences. They pray for anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Public Prosecutor, after taking instructions, submits that no crime has been registered and the petitioners are not required to be arrested in connection with any crime registered at the instance of the said complainant/Sonia. A petition has been received. Enquiry has been conducted. An attempt was made to settle the dispute between the parties. It B.A. No. 6056 OF 2007 -: 2 :- is made clear that the petitioners are not required to be arrested and no crime has been registered against them. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that if the petitioners were in future required for arrest in connection with any allegation raised by the said Sonia in respect of any event prior to this date, prior permission of this Court shall be taken before any arrest of the petitioner is effected. The said submissions of the learned Public Prosecutor are taken note of and hereby recorded. It is evident that the apprehension of the petitioner is without any basis. 3. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- (R. BASANT, JUDGE) Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge