IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-36841 of 2010 Date of Decision: February 08, 2011 Joginder Singh. …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is an application seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 56, dated 28.08.2009, under Sections 406, 420, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Babain, District Kurukshetra. As per the prosecution story, petitioner has not executed sale deed pursuant to the agreement to sell, hence, has cheated the complainant. Undisputedly, suit for CRM M-36841 of 2010 specific performance is pending against the accused filed by third party pertaining to the same property. What would be the effect of either of the agreement; one executed in favour of the complainant; and second executed in favour of the plaintiff of that civil suit, can be seen only in civil proceeding. Considering totality of the circumstances, present petition is allowed. Let petitioner be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. February 08, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2