IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 2ND ASWINA 1930 AS.No. 503 of 1998 & CROSS OBJECTION ---------------------------------------- OS.1006/1992 of ADDL.SUB COURT, KOTTAYAM .................... APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: ------------------------- K.S.RAVIKUMAR, RESIDING AT MANIMANDIRAM, VAZHAPPALLY KIZHAKKU, CHANGANACHERRY ALSO HAVING RESIDENCE AT VIJAYA BHAVAN, KIZHAKKE KARA, PULAMON P.O., KOTTARAKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR SRI.V.G.ARUN RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS: --------------------------------- 1. K.S.RAJU, RESIDING AT MANIMANDIRAM, VAZHAPPALLY KIZHAKKU, CHANGANACHERRY. 2. K.S.SANTHAMMA, RESIDING AT 16/TAKING TERRACE, SINGAPORE-1953. 3. K.S.AMMINI, RESIDING AT AUGUST MANDIRAM, KIZHAKKA KARA, PULAMON, KOTTARAKKARA. 4. K.S.OMANA, RESIDING AT KARULASSERI HOUSE, ARUTHUVUZHAY, KALAPPURACKAL WARD, ALLEPPEY. 5. K.S.MANI, RESIDING AT MANIMANDIRAM, NOW RESIDING AT C/O.K.S.MANI, ARABIAN AUTOMOBILES, KHOFRUKHANI, UAE. 6. C.S.KAMALASANAN, RESIDING AT AUGUST MANDIRAM, KIZHAKKEKARA, PULAMON P.O., KOTTARAKKARA. 7. THE CHANGANACHERRY COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, A FIRM REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT WITH REGISTERED OFFICE AT VAZHAPPALLY KIZHAKKU, CHANGANACHERRY. ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH (SR.) FOR R3, R6. SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON THIS APPEAL SUIT HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/09/2008 ALONG WITH AS NO. 505 OF 1998, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A.S.Nos.503 of 1998 & Cross Objection and 505 of 1998 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 24th September, 2008 JUDGMENT It was submitted at the Bar on an earlier posting date that A.S.No.525/98 related to a similar issue and that in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties in A.S.No.525/98, in all probability these appeals have also been settled between the parties. Time was sought for getting instructions. Today it is submitted by the counsel for the appellant that there is no response from the party despite issuance of registered letter. The registered letter which was sent to the party has been returned with the endorsement 'not known'. I feel that in all probability, the issue has been settled between the parties. The appeals will stand dismissed for non- prosecution. The Cross Objection filed in A.S.No.503 of 1998 also will stand dismissed. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE