1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1190 of 2008 IN SUIT NO. 877 OF 2008 Sharad Navnit Mehta .....Plaintiff Versus Mrs. Updesh Kaur .....Defendant And Dr. Manohar N. Bhaip .....Respondent Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar i/b. M/s. I. R. Joshi & Co., Advocate for the Plaintiff. Mr. N. D. Jaywant, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATE : 18TH JANUARY, 2010. P.C. : Heard learned Counsel for the Plaintiff and the Respondent. 2. The present chamber summons is filed for amendment of the plaint in terms of the schedule annexed thereto. The amendment was necessitated in view of the averment of the Defendant in reply to the notice of motion taken out by the Plaintiff that the suit property were transferred in favour of the Respondent on 20th March, 2008. 3. The Plaintiff has filed the above suit for specific performance of an oral agreement on 11th March, 2008. The lis pendens with reference to the suit is already registered under section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with 2 the Sub-Registrar. Inspite of the above fact, the Defendant has transferred the property in favour of the Respondent. The amendment is necessitated because of subsequent events. In that view of the matter, the chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a). 2. Necessary amendment be carried out by the Plaintiff within a period of two weeks from today and amended copy of the plaint be served on the Defendants within further period of two weeks. Sd/- (R. V. MORE, J.)