IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 10265 of 2002 Between: A.V. Reddi Naidu, S/o. Satyanarayana, Hindu, Aged 35 years, Correspondent & Secretary, Poorna Sai Vivekananda Educational Society, Court Peta, Yellamanchili-531055, Visakhapatnam District-A.P. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Secretary Board of Intermediate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2. Konathala Mahila Junior College for Girls and Boys, represented by its Correspondent & Secretary, Old State Bank of India Building, Main Road, Yellamanchili, Visakhapatnam District. 3. Geetanjali Junior College, represented by its Correspondent/Secretary, Beside State Bank of India, Main Road, Yellamanchili, Visakhapatnam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the first respondent to take appropriate action within a week against the constitution of 2nd and 3rd respondent colleges by disposing the representations dated 18.4.2002 of the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.M.PATRO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.2: MR. O. MANOHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.3: MR. D.V. SITHARAM MURTHY The Court made the following: ORDER: The writ petition is being disposed of at the interlocutory stage with the consent of the learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned respondents as an innocuous prayer is sought in the writ petition. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the first respondent in proposing to grant permission/affiliation to respondents 2 and 3. At the time of filing the writ petition, no such permission is granted. It appears subsequently, the first respondent granted affiliation to third respondent. The petitioner’s representation admittedly is not been disposed of by the first respondent, and therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 18.4.2002 and pass appropriate orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. _______________ October 7, 2004. V.V.S. RAO, J YS To 1. The Secretary, Board of Intermediate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2. Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Higher Education, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (O.U.T) 3. Two C.D. Copies.