IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 7TH JULY 2008 / 16TH ASHADHA 1930 W.P(C).No. 20287 of 2008(M) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, MADATHIL KODUKULANJI KARODE, KOCHUVALLOOR P.O., VAVENMANI, ALAPPUZHA, DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.J.DEVADANAM SRI.VINOD J.DEV SRI.PRAMOD J.DEV RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, VENMANI, GRAMA PANCHAYATH, VENMANI, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. KARTHIYANI AMMA, VOTTIYIL HOUSE, KODUKULATHI KARODE, KOCHUVALLOOR P.O., VENMONI, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA. 3. KOSHY MATHEW, VOTTIYIL KIZHAKKETHIL, KOCHUVALLOOR P.O.,VENMANI, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 20287 OF 2008 M ==================== Dated this the 7th day of July, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that he has filed Ext.P1 before the 1st respondent complaining that the party respondents have trespassed into puramboke land and reduced it into their possession. In this writ petition, what is sought for is that the 1st respondent may be directed to pass orders on Ext.P1. 2. In view of the limited nature of the relief that is sought for, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the 1st respondent shall consider Ext.P1 and pass orders thereon with notice to respondents 2 and 3. This the 1st respondent shall do, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. I clarify that I have not expressed anything on the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner and it is entirely for the 1st respondent to decide the matter. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp