HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH C.R.P.NO. 426 OF 2010 AND C.R.P. NO. 459 OF 2010 Thursday, the Twenty Seventh of January, Two Thousand and Eleven Between Smt. Anumalasetty Lakshmi Petitioner in both the C.R.Ps. AND The Commissioner, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam, Ram Nagar, Visakhapatnam Respondent in both the C.R.Ps. COMMON ORDER: The parties in both these Civil Revision Petitions are one and the same and suits filed by the petitioner are similar. The suits were filed for a declaration that the enhancement of the municipal tax by the respondent herein is illegal and relief is sought for, for fixation of rental value and to fix the tax payable on the property. Pending suits, applications seeking to grant temporary injunction were also filed restraining the respondent herein from interfering with the peaceful enjoyment of the plaint schedule properties including collection of alleged illegal demanded amount towards tax. As the suit prayer and the interim prayer are one and the same, the court below dismissed the injunction petitions, against which the petitioners herein filed Civil Miscellaneous Appeals before the Principal District Judge, Visakhapatnam and the lower appellate court has dismissed both the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals. Aggrieved thereby, the present Civil Revision Petitions are filed. I have perused the orders passed by the lower appellate court. As the relief in the suit and the interim relief are one and the same, the trial court has rightly dismissed the applications, which are rightly affirmed by the lower appellate court. Therefore, I do not see any legal infirmity or otherwise, warranting interference in the impugned order. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. No order as to costs. However, the suits filed by the plaintiff – petitioner be disposed of on priority basis. ___________________ Justice V.Eswaraiah January 27, 2011 MAS