IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2088 of 2011 Hare Ram Paswan, S/O-Sri Devan Paswan Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 04 30.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 30.05.2009 in a case registered under Sections 392/411 of the Indian Penal Code. Although, petitioner is named in the first information report but allegedly, some looted articles have been recovered from his possession and he was identified by the witnesses in Test Identification Parade. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in jail custody since long and up-till-now his trial has not been concluded. It is further submitted by him that the report of learned trial court shows that there is no possibility of conclusion of trial of the petitioner in near future. It is also submitted by him that petitioner has already been released on bail in other cases which have been instituted against him after remand in the present case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda, Biharsharif in connection with Rajgir (Nalanda) P.S. Case No. 38 of 2009 subject to condition that one of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner and furthermore, petitioner - 2 - shall attend the trial court on each and every date in person for the period of nine months and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without any genuine cause, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. It goes without saying that the trial court shall take all possible steps to conclude the trial of the petitioner within the above stated period. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)