IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2011 / 3RD ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 17139 of 2011(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :- ------------------------ PARALI UMMER, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.PARALI MOHAMMED KUTTY, PARALI HOUSE, PULLIPARAMBU, P.O.CHELEMBRA, MALAPPURAM-673 634. BY ADV. SRI.LIJU.V.STEPHEN SRI.EBY AUGUSTINE SMT.INDU SUSAN JACOB RESPONDENT(S) :- --------------------------- 1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM-676 505. 2. LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, TRIVANDRUM-695 001. GOVT. PLEADER MR.T.K.ARAVINDA KUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: jvt WP(C).No.17139 OF 2011 APPENDIX Petitioner's Exhibits :- Ext.P1 :- Copy of the sale deed No.1867/2007. Ext.P2 :- Copy of the order dated 26-5-2011 of the 1st respondent. Respondent's Exhibits :- NIL. //True Copy// P.A. to Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ----------------------------- W.P.(C).No.17139 of 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of June 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner claims to be the owner of 27.5 cents of land comprising in Survey No.107/11 of Chelembra Village. Ext.P1 is the sale deed. In respect of the said property, proceedings were initiated under the Land Utilization Order, 1967 resulting in Ext.P2 order of the first respondent dated 26.5.2011. According to the petitioner, aggrieved by Ext.P2 order, he has already filed an appeal and the said appeal is pending consideration before the 2nd respondent. Mean while, steps were taken by the 1st respondent to auction the cultivation rights in respect of the said property and according to the petitioner auction is scheduled on 27.6.2011. It is in these circumstances, the writ petition is filed. 2. Having regard to the pendency of the appeal filed W.P.(C).No.17139 of 2011 -: 2 :- against Ext.P2, if I feel the steps taken by the 2nd respondent in pursuance to the order are premature. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions :- (1)that the 2nd respondent will dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner against Ext.P2 order. This shall be done with notice to the petitioner and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. (2)It is directed that in the mean time, the first respondent will keep in abeyance further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P2. (3)Petitioner to produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Jvt