IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 30.06.2010 C.R.No.3326 of 2010 Sher Singh ...Petitioner Versus Gurpreet Kaur etc. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Tribhawan Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Faridkot on 20.02.2010, whereby the objections filed by the petitioner were dismissed. The petitioner has objected to the execution of the Award on the ground that claimant Gurpreet Kaur has married Nirmal Singh and, thus, she is not entitled to the compensation on account of death of her husband in a motor accident. The learned Tribunal has found that such objections are not available to the petitioner in execution. In view of the above, I do not find that the finding recorded by the learned Tribunal suffers from patent illegality or irregularity, which may warrant any interference in exercise of the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. Dismissed. 30.06.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE