IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14584 of 2011 Surendra Singh @ Akhileshwar Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03/ 28.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is accused under sections 302 and 201/34 of the IPC. Although none has seen the actual killing of the deceased but it is the prosecution case that deceased had solemnized his court marriage with the daughter of the petitioner against his will and on the alleged date of the occurrence deceased was taken away by the petitioner and other accused in their house and subsequently, dead body of the deceased was found in a gunny bag near the house of the petitioner. In course of investigation bloodstain was found at different places of the house of the petitioner and statement of the daughter of the petitioner who is said to be wife of the deceased was recorded and she stated in her statement that on the alleged date of the occurrence deceased had come to her house and an altercation took place between her as well as deceased and thereafter she left along with her mother to her village. The aforesaid circumstances, prima facie, indicate involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime. Accordingly, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, his prayer for bail in connection with Ara Nawada P. S. Case no. 358/2010 corresponding to GR No. 3007 of 2010 pending in the court of Sri Vivek Bhardawaj, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Bhojpur at Ara stands rejected. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)