IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH AUGUST 2008 / 5TH BHADRA 1930 RP.No. 918 of 2008(L) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ IN WPC.960/2008 Dated 31/07/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER: PETITIONER --------------------------- M/S. ENARC CONSULTANTS, ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, M.G. ROAD, THRISSUR, REPRESETNED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER K. RAMAKRISHNAN. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------ 1. THE GENERAL MANAGER, THRISSUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., KARUPPAM ROAD, THRISSUR. 2. THE REGISTRAR, KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, PRESS CLUB ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SHRI.V.G.ARUN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== R.P.No.918/2008 in W.P.(C).No. 960/2008 ================== Dated this the 27th day of August, 2008 O R D E R The petitioner in the writ petition seeks clarification of my judgment by filing this review petition. The clarification sought for is that the petitioner's remedy by way of arbitration as provided in the agreement between the parties may not be prejudiced since I had held that the petitioner's remedy lies in filing either a suit or filing appropriate petition under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operatives Societies Act. I make it clear that I had not intended to curtail the remedy of the petitioner by way of arbitration as provided in Ext.P1 agreement. Review petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2