IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 11686 of 2008 Between: G.V.L.N. Sarma S/o.Late Rama Rao, R/o.D.No.4-1-44/16, Vadlamani Street,Amalapuram-533201 East Godavari District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector and Agent to the Government East Godavari District Kakinada 2 The Agency Divisional Officer Rampachodavaram,East Godavari District 3 The Project Officer ITDA Ramachodavaram,East Godavari District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to deliver the judgment in OS 26/2006 on the file of the Court of the Agency Divisional Officer,Ramachodavarm,East Godavari District expeditiously within the time fixed by the Honourable Court and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.RAMA GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY W.P.NO.11686 OF 2008 O R D E R; This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing the inaction of the second respondent in disposing of the suit O.S.No.26 of 2006. The petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.6 of 2005 on the file of the District Collector and Agent to the Government, East Godavari District, Kakinada – 1st respondent. He filed the suit for recovery of Rs.59,445/- with interest at 24% per annum. Subsequently, the suit came to be transferred to the file of Agency Divisional Officer, Rampachodavaram, East Godavari District – 2nd respondent and renumbered as O.S.No.26 of 2006. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the second respondent heard the matter and reserved for judgment on 02.4.2007, but so far judgment is not delivered. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the affidavit and material placed on record. It appears that the plaintiff submitted representations to the respondents 1 and 2 bringing to their notice the delay in delivery of judgment in O.S.No.26 of 2006. Such is the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition at admission stage directing the second respondent to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.26 of 2006 within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order. ________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J 10th June, 2008 Note: Furnish CC within One week. (B/o) PNV To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{BMR} THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY W.P.NO.11686 OF 2008 10TH JUNE,2008