IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 6TH MAY 2011 / 16TH VAISAKHA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 3382 of 2011() ------------------------------------------- SC.456/2006 of ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT (ADHOC), PATHANAMTHITTA .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED. ---------------------------------------- SURESH, S/O. YESODHARAN, OTTAPLAMOOTIL HOUSE, NELLIKKALA, ELANTHOOR VILLAGE, KOZENCHERRY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.V.SETHUNATH SRI.PRAKASH KESAVAN RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT/STATE. ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. THE S.I. OF POLICE, ARANMULA POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No.3382 of 2011 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 06.05.2011 ORDER Petitioner, who is the 2nd accused in S.C.No.456/2006 on the file of Additional Sessions Court (Fast Tracl-I), seeks anticipatory bail. 2.Admittedly non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Court below and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the court below and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably, on the same date on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner. This Bail Application is, accordingly, disposed of. V. RAMKUMAR,(JUDGE) sj