IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-10726 of 2010 Date of Decision: April 09, 2010 Phillip .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Rahul Chhatwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.23 dated 20.2.2010 under Sections 323, 324, 148, 149, 307 IPC registered with Police Station, Makhu, District Ferozepur. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has not caused any injury to the injured. I have considered the contention of learned counsel in the context of offence under Crl. Misc. No. M-10726 of 2010 [2] Section 307 IPC and the prayer made in the petition for anticipatory bail. I find that the petitioner enabled the incident to happen. It is the petitioner (Phillip) who called the complainant outside. When the complainant came outside the tuition room, the petitioner and one unknown boy held the complainant by hands when Salim gave a blow of Dasti Kappa which hit the complainant on right side of head. Subsequently, injuries were given by other accused also. Considering the role of the petitioner, in my considered opinion, no ground for bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is made out. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) April 09, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?