PETITIONER -‘ ;b 3;, "’ R/o Qr. No. 35/3 Street No. 37 wwi '» BEFORE THE HON'BL HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 5ingla‘Benéli WRIT PETITION (C) No.V"i'2> /L_, l 2009 k4 .w-fi‘” v é V A S/o Krishan Late Kumar Shri B.P. Sharma Sharma Aged about 45Years I V’a’” RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION W O F INDIA a“ ugh ......... District Durg, C.G. VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. Chhattisgarh Pradesh Amateur Boxing Association Through the President , Qr. 5/A Street No. 24 Sector —5 Bhilai Nagar, District Durg (C.G.) 2. R. Rajendran Secretary, . Chhattisgarh Pradesh Amateur -Boxing Association ‘ Qr. 2/B Street No. 1 Sector —1 Bhilai Nagar, District Durg (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, I Department of Sports & Youth welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantraiaya, Raipur, C.G. r VX HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Petitioner , Kishan'Kumar Shanna, S/o Late Shn’ B. P. Shanna, aged about 45 years, R10 Qr. No. BS/B, Street No. 37, Sector No.4 Bhilai Nagar, District Durg CG. V762) \0% W) Versus Respondents 1. Chhattisgarh Pradesh Amateu‘r Boxing Association, through the President, Qr. 5/ A, Street No. 24, Sector — 5, Bhilai Nagar, District Durg (C.G.) R. Rajendran, Secretary, Chhattisgarh Pradesh Amateur Boxing Association, Qr. 2/13, Street No.1, Sector — 1, Bhilai Nagar, District Durg (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Spoxts 65 youth Welfare, D.k.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, C.G. Shri B, K. Chakrabarty, Advocate for the petitioner. Shn' M. P. S. Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondent No3] State. ( Passed on this 17th day of August, 2009 ) Heard. The petitioner, who claims to be a Trainer of the Chhattisgarh Pradesh Amateur Boxing Association, situated at Bhilai, district Durg, seeks quashing of the order dated 3.7.2009 (Annexure P! H/on the ground that during the pendency of the the petitioner is not being permitted to charge sheet, participate in any of the activities of the association. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that if the relief has not been granted, the petitioner would not be in ORDER {oral} Writ Petition (C) No. 4422 of 2009 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon’ble Shxi Satish K. Agnihotn' J.) @ ; a position to take participation in the activities of thc association. On heating learned comsel and perusing the documents, appended thereto, it appears that sem'ous charges are levelled against the petitioner in the charge sheet dated 22.6.2009 (Annexure 13/3). By the impugned order dated 3.7.2009 (Annexure P/ 1) it has been made clear that the petitioner Would not be considered for participation in any of the activities of the association in View of the pendency of the charge sheet. I have not found any irregularity or illegality in the process adopted by the concerned authority of the association. The charge sheet against the petitioner is pending enquiry and consideration. The‘petitioner may very well participate in the V enquiry and put forward his case. At this stage neither it is expedient nor proper to interfere with the pending enquiry against the petitioner. The petition is accordingly dismissed. U1 Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotrii Judge Thakur 'x