i'i:1- r 5 ^. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR: CHHATTISGARH W.P. N0^li OF 2006 Petitioner ..••''•".0<S-h" , ^--"""^;\^^:-""" ^^^y State of Chhattisgarh through the Divisional Forest Officer, South Surguja Forest Division, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (Chhattisgarh) Respondents Versus ^1. SiyaRamVerma S/o Suraj Deen Verma R/o Godhanpur, Post- Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (Chhattisgarh) ^2. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ambikapur Distt. Surguja WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^•'" HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BU-ASPUR Hon'ble hflr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker PETITIONER Writ Petition No. 535/2006 State of Chhattisgarh Versus RESPONDENTS Siya Ram Verma and another Shri Pravin Das Dy. GA for the petitioner/State. Shri V.K. Pandey counsel for respondent No.1. WRTI PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA ORDER (18.08.2011) The petitioner/State has filed this petition challenging the/ award dated 26.5.2005 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Presiding Officer, Labnur Court, Ambikepur in Case No. 94/1D Act/2002 (Ref.) whereby respondent No.1 was directed to be reinstated as internal security labour, without back wages. Counsel for the respondent No. 1 has produced a copy of the 'order dated 10.9.2008 whereby the respondent No.1 has been appointed on the post of Forest Guard in the regular pay scale of Rs. 2750-70-3800-75-4400. Copy of the order is taken on record. On instructions, counsel further submits that respondent No. 1 will not claim any back wages. In view of above, according to the counsel for the petitioner/State, nothing survives in this matter for adjudication. Thus, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge