IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-37050 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 08.12.2011 Satnam Singh …Petitioner Versus Amarjit Singh …Respondent ………. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. R.P. Dhir, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that petitioner is owner of car bearing temporary registration No.PB-10-CX-TEMP/2010-1614 having Chassis No. AR67074, Engine No.AR67074 and Key No.T-243244 of Diamond white colour, which was looted from the possession of the petitioner by the respondent. Further contends that now petitioner shall file suit for mandatory injunction along with an application under Section 94 CPC seeking direction to the defendant/respondent to produce the car before the court so that same may be given in the custody of the receiver, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. However, it is made clear that if suit is filed and an application seeking direction to respondent to produce the car before the court under Section 94 CPC is moved, same shall be decided by the trial court in accordance with law without any undue delay. Any observation made by the Sessions Judge or Executive Magistrate in the present case shall not prejudice the mind of the trial court while taking decision on the suit or interim application. ( Alok Singh ) December 8, 2011 Judge Anand