IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23365 of 2010 SHAILESH YADAV @ SHALENDRA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 09.07.2010 Petitioner is languishing in jail in connection with a case registered under Section 394 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that four miscreants came to the house of the informant and took away Rs. 10,000/- on the point of pistol. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is the resident of neighboring village of the informant, nothing has been recovered from the petitioner nor T.I. parade has been held. Though petitioner is involved in one other case of assault but he is not involved in any other case registered under Section 394 I.P.C. Learned counsel for the State, Mr. Mehta submits that apart from the confession, several witnesses have disclosed the name of the petitioner during investigation which has been controverted by learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that those witnesses have filed a petition before the learned Court below that no such statement was ever been recorded by the police as claimed by the prosecution. Considering the aforesaid submissions that 2 petitioner was never been put on T.I. parade nor any recovery has been made nor petitioner is involved in any similar kind of cases, let the petitioner namely Shailesh Yadav @ Shalendra Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Ashthwan P.S. Case No. 16 of 2010(G.R. No. 309 of 2010). Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)