Crl. Misc No. M 9309 OF 2011 ****** Balkar Masih vs State of Punjab Present : Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Gill, DAG Punjab. Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate for the complainant. ******* The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.42, dated 2.3.2011, registered under Sections 406, 498-A, 323, 506 of the IPC, at Police Station Civil Lines Batala, District Gurdaspur. Report of the Additional District and Sessions Judge Gurdaspur has been received, as per which attempts at mediation have failed. Resultantly, this petition has to be decided on merits. Counsel for the petitioner has argued that the real cause of the dispute was the fact that the complainant was married earlier and had a child and thereafter got married to the petitioner without disclosing him about the earlier marriage and even without getting divorce from the earlier husband. Counsel for the complainant is not in a position to deny these facts. In this view of the matter, possibility of the petitioner being falsely involved in this case cannot be ruled out. Consequently, the order dated 4.5.2011 is made absolute. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) August 03, 2011. JUDGE `kk'