: 1 : wp.106.2010.sxw vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.106 OF 2010 Suryakant Chandrarao Pawar & Ors. ... Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.S.P. Kadam for the Petitioners Mr.R.M. Patne, AGP, Respondent Nos.1,2 & 3 CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE: JUNE 9, 2011. P.C.: 1. The orders passed by the authorities under the Land Revenue Code while making entries by themselves do not decide any issue of title in immovable property. Those entries do not confer title as is well settled. So also the rights in the immovable property must be agitated before the competent civil court. Once such a clarification is issued, there is nothing which warrants and requires my interference in the writ jurisdiction with the orders of the Collector and the additional Commissioner. These are orders made during the RTS proceedings and observations therein do not conclude any issues much less those raised in the writ petition. All contentions of the parties in that behalf are kept open and remain unaffected by the impugned orders. 2. With this clarification, the petition is disposed of. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)