IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO :21917 of 2006 Between: M.V.Ramana Reddy, s/o M.V.Konda Reddy, o/o Sri Bhagyalakshmi Gas Agencies, Extension Counter Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., K.G.Road, Nandikotkur, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 the District Collector (Civil Supplies) Kurnool District. 2 Gouri Shankar Gas Agency, Extension Counter, rep., by its Prop:B.Gangadhar Reddy, r/o M/G-4/2, Nandikotkur, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.S.SASTRY FOR MR.M.V.RAJA RAM Counsel for Respondent No.1: AGP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction particularly in the writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in Rc.CS.2/539/2003 dated 06-10-2006 cancelling the hitherto permission given for opening extension point for L.P.G. outlet at Nandikotkur as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, contrary to law, without authority of law and also in violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India apart from being in violation of the constitutional guarantee contained under Article 300 A of the Constitution of India, contrary to the Directive Principles of State Policy, in violation of the Constitutional Guaranteed contained in Article 300 A of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the provisions of A.P. Petroleum Products (Licensing and Regulation) of Supplies Order 1980.” At the hearing, Sri J.S.Sastry, learned counsel representing Sri M.V.Rajaram, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition in terms of his letter, 21.04.2008 addressed to the Registry. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 22nd APRIL, 2008 kvni