1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 107 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 107 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 107 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1307 OF 2004 Mr. Nikhil Jhaveri ... Petitioner Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors. ... Respondents And Mahesh Govale & Ors. ... Applicants Mr. Kamal Kheta i/by Kishore Thakordas for Petitioner. Mr. V.S. Paradkar for R. No. 7. Mr. S.G. Surana for R. NO. 5. Mr. V.T. Walawalkar i/by A. Iyengar for Applicant. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : MARCH 23, 2006 DATED : MARCH 23, 2006 DATED : MARCH 23, 2006 P.C. . This is an application by the applicant to be added as party. In our opinion, considering the controversy, it is not required that he be added as respondent. The motion can be disposed of by issuing following directions : 2 . The applicants and similarly situated others whose structures are in the list prepared by the Collector to apply to the Collector for verification of their claims. If the Collector accepts their claim then these applicants and such other will be entitled to alternative accommodation. If the applications have not been taken out by the applicant, the same should be take out within two weeks and the Collector to dispose of the same within six weeks thereafter. It is further made clear that those who are held eligible and to whom alternative accommodation is made available are bound to shift to the alternative accommodation which is made available. In respect of those who have shifted, the Collector to take steps to demolish the structure forthwith. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)