IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1019 of 2006 NIRMALA SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4. 9.2.2010. Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. D.Choudhary, learned Assisting Counsel to SC-3 and Mr. Maqbool Ahmad learned counsel for the Board are present, Learned counsel for the petitioner admits to the payment of the entire retiral benefits as admissible to the petitioner but disputes the quantum of G.P.F. amount paid to her. Having regard to the circumstances that the admissible dues as payable to the petitioner has been paid, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this writ petition pending and the same is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to raise her grievance in relation to quantum of GPF amount before the respondent no.6, The District Provident Fund Officer, Kishanganj together with supportive documents and calculation details and if the petitioner makes out any claim for further payment towards principal and/or interest, the same 2 ahk (Jyoti Saran,J.) should be paid to her within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. The writ petition stands disposed of.