'i- :y.:>»-' ~^f Qf rtj •fs^ .- ''s»t- ~'vei./' y— sifer^i f^Tti<ft -Si^Q st»*iicr> ^tfia •FSt -^MM^, ^iStWW. hwwy. sn^r TR^? _..^'£:.M^.£iS^/^ 111CTI 9>W<* ^t^St' SII^I WtITW^lft?! PETITIONER Kohit ycars, ^s •janpaq Javvahdr Kumar Desnlahara, S/o aged 42 4sstL Dcvclopmcnt Extension Officcr, Pancha.yg.t Dui^, R/'o H. No. 286, nagar, Durg, Distt. Durg (CG) Versus R^PONDENTS 1. The Q-a/'l Ol./^A. Rur^l Maal 2. The T\s stary, Departm.ent Development, D.K.S. (ralaya, Raipur, diTector, Panchayat Service, 3. /l uevqiopinent Raip^ir, Distt. Raipur |CG| Executive Pan^hayat, Durg. (CG| T'Tia i iJLC c'1-*i Oiiili S5: tiOn. SHiy DHIREnDRA. MtBHKAajJ AHv. 6-12-2008 yjtunU.K. Mui, Advoca|te Shri Arun Sao, Govt. This petition is directep 8-2005 (Annexure P-5) Assistaat Developinent Exte4si Leamed counsel for stay order dated 28-9-2005 of Aaiiexure P-5 has not beeA eft'r^ii^i'T tiwv^ ^ ^%t <nq«i< i; 3rf:(n an^i State of CUhattisgarh through the nf ParT-1 UA JT CU.Ai/1;hayat and unawan Raipur D.K.S and Kiiral KjTi.swsn •Aff .ilCi RD.Sahu, Asstt. OfScer DeveL Zila Developmeat Extelasion Officer, Dondi, Distt. Dm'g (CG) WRI'T PETITION UNDBR ARTICLB 226 OP 'THB CONSTTTu-TION OFINDIA dvoca|te, tbr fhe petitioner. A|lv., for the State. agaiust the order of ti-ansfer dated 31- wh^reby fhe petitioner who is working as Exte4sion Officer, Durg to Dondi. petitioner subnuts fhat by virtue of itassed by mis Court, fhe iuipugned order given eftect to till date. r l'Ik ®XI-HC-22 aii^T'qii R;niq> -^i^a st»Hi<:fr«^a -g^ET ^MH'4. ^TilWlii. (;t<'ll'M*l< 3TI^?T •VrSR IIICTI ai*iict)'""""""""""""""'""""'TFI. 200 'iq^r' 3)1^1 ^aiwHfCT ide Leamed counsel for the oraer, Uie unpugnea oraer Jias has become redundant and these circunistances, they hav^ wifh fhe liberty to me State to ot transter/postmg ot Uie exigency. In view of the above State, the instant petition is aUi P-5 is set aside. However, appropnate order in Uie uiatter oftraasfer/postuig of tlle evett tUe 4iWfd'Ifl-l *<14cfl'4 ft^t <i«it$K ^; 3l)i(I>I 311^1 State subinits that tu view ol the stav |not been given eflect to aiid ttie saine leaaiagless with fhe lapse of time. In uo objection if fhe petition is allowed Ipass appropriate oriers in the uiatter iu fhe event of administrative pequouer siibiaission of learued counsel for the (?wed and impugned order ofAunexure State shaU be at Uberty to pass of admmistrative exigency in fhe petiUoner. Jndge