1 wp8479.sxw ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8479 OF 2010 Yashwant Vividh Karyakari Sahakari Seva Sanstha Ltd.Dist.Kolhapur ...Petitioner vs. Shri Dnyaneshwar mauli Vividh Karyakari Sahakari (Vikas) Seva Sanstha Mydt.Dist.Kolhapur & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Amit Borkar for the petitioner Mr.S.S.Patwardhan for the respondent no.1 Mr.R.M.Patne, A.G.P for respondent nos.2 to 4 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : OCTOBER 21, 2010 P.C. . Not on board. Taken on board. 1 When the papers of this writ petition were produced yesterday, the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.P and the learned counsel Mr.Salunke for the first respondent who had filed caveat were heard. Today, another counsel appears for the first respondent. The learned A.G.P had sought time to take instructions. Today, the learned A.G.P on instructions makes a statement that the State Government has withdrawn the order impugned dated 8th September 2010 on the ground that the petitioner was not heard. 2 The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the revision application before the State Government was not maintainable in as much as a remedy of preferring appeal was available. Now, the impugned order has been withdrawn and therefore, it is obvious that before 2 wp8479.sxw deciding the revision application, the petitioner will have to be heard. 3 As the impugned order stands withdrawn, the petition is disposed of by directing that the revision application shall be heard afresh after notice to the petitioner and all concerned parties. 4 It is made clear that all contentions of the parties to the revision application including the contention on the issue of maintainability of the revision application are kept open. JUDGE