^ c^ ^rc^-. IN THE HON'BLE HI&H COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETCTCON f S ) N0. <^31 ^ OF 2010 PETCTCONERS 3P/; ^•• ' '/r^V _^,,^.^\' ^^ ^ .:ic:- ^0'', ^^y RESPONDENTS ,^u—"^';..,^ /y'^l?f^,. ^'/' 'N8^.\ £( .... a^^'Y:s 1 ;,^».( '•^B-l^ ^"" 1. Laxman Prasad Sidar S/o. Shri Tilak Ram Sidar, aged about 38 Years, Residence of Village - Mitthumuda Raigarh, Tahsil and bistt.- Raigarh (C.G.) 2. Anil Kumar Sidar S/o. Shri Madhusudan Sidar, aged about 33 Years, Residence of Village - Mitthumuda Raigarh, Tahsil and Distt.- Raigarh ( C.6.) ^y" 3. Ku. Khema Bai b/o. Mayadhar Bhoi aged about 25 Years, Residence of Village - Badehardi. Tahsil Pussore, Distt.- Raigarh ( C.G.) VERSUS \^ The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Panchayat and Rural Development bepartment, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.6.) 2.- The Collector , Raigarh, Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) .,/ 3." bistrict Education Officer Raigarh Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block - Pussore, Distt.- Raigarh ( C.G.) ^' 5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pussore. Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) b 6. Tahsildar pussore, Distt.- Raigarh (C.&.) WRIT PETCTCON UNDER ARTECLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTCON QF INDIA FOR ISSUEANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT. ty-7? -HC—78 <n^^l ich*ll<h 's^ "41^1^^, ^•<il-<-i4i<o, fc«ni<-i^< . V(^C^,^&.,^312-/^01^ /"^200 ^ ^ 3TI^T "q^R (^G|(^<^) 3^r'^t f<^ch ^T^TT^T'^TOoF -J- ^WI^IT ^a 3Ti^I S.B:_HON'BLE_.JUSTiCE MR. PRSTS 30-08-2010: Shri Sunil Sahu, counsei for th^ Shri Vaibhav A. Goverdhan PU t^ey Grievance of the petitioners ii post of Siksha Karmi Grade III but the said post by respondent No. 5| joining in due tlme. On the other hand, it has beei|i details of joining haye not been giv^ would be difficuit for the State to sa^l time. At this stage, counsel for the] would be sei-ved Ifthe petltioner is the respondent No. 2 and 5 raising ^i respondents may be directed t^: expedltiously in accordance wlth iaw. The petltion is disposed ofl eventuaiity of fiiing any such repre^ respondent No. 2 and 5 raising ail tl( sald respondents to decide the sam^ aspect ofthe case as expedltlously !t is made clear that thls merits ofthe case and the authority the appllcation strictiy in accordance a^ Coilirt ^l^{<r<<Ml^ 'HTWTf ^f fe^t <pai^« '^3tfim3?r^T MKERDIWAKER petltloners. for the State/respondents. that they have been selected cn the have not been permitted to join on desplte the fact that they gave thelr pointed out by the State counsel that ^n by'the petltioners and, therefore, it that respondents gave theirjolnlng in Ipetitloner submlts that ends of justice t3ermitted to fl!e representation before }ii their grievances and in turn the sald declde the said representatlon Iwlth the aforesald diTection. In the lentation by the petitioners before the (eir grievances, it Is expected from the considering aii the factuai and !ega! ^ possibie. has not expressed any opinion on ^oncerned would be at liberty to declde Nth iaw. 'l. Sd/- 1 Pritinker Diwaker Judge