IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 32 of 2011. Gurdeep Kaur W/O Sri Dara Singh R/O Village Saroja, Tehsil Sitarganj, U.S.Nagar. … Petitioner. Vs. 1. Tehsildar Sitarganj, U.S.Nagar. 2. The Uttarakhand Rajya Sahkari Bank Ltd. Branch Khatima through its Branch Manager. …Respondents. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocate holding brief of Tumul Nailwal, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. N.P.Sah, Standing Counsel, learned counsel for the respondent no.1. Mr. K.K.Sah, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2- Bank. Date January 06, 2011. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Interim Relief Application) Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned recovery notice dated 15-6-2010 (Annexure No.1) issued by respondent no.1. Further prayer for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to fix instalments for payment of the amount under the recovery notice/citation has been made. According to the petitioner, she took a loan of Rs. 1,00,000/- (one Lakh) in the year 2000 from the respondent no.2-Bank for construction of a house as agricultural loan. Due to loss in agriculture, the petitioner could not repay the instalments of the loan amount. Ultimately, the impugned recovery citation (Annexure No.1) for recovery of amount of Rs. 2,56,483/- plus other charges has been issued against the petitioner, which gave rise to the present writ petition. In the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the entire outstanding amount under the recovery citation (Annexure No.1) 2 along with recovery charges in easy instalments. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent Bank Mr. K.K.Sah, Advocate, has submitted that the respondent no.2-Bank would have no objection if the entire outstanding amount under the recovery citation is paid by the petitioner in not more than six equal quarterly instalments and the first instalment being paid by 10th day of March, 2011. In the above and circumstances of the case, it would be in the fitness of things to direct the petitioner to repay the entire outstanding amount under the impugned recovery citation (Annexure No. 1 to the petition) along with recovery charges before the recovery officer-Tehsildar Sitarganj (Udham Singh Nagar) (respondent no.1) in six equal quarterly instalments. The first quarterly instalment shall be payable by 10th day of March 2011. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to pay the entire outstanding amount under the recovery citation (Annexure-1 to the petition) in six equal quarterly instalments before the recovery officer- respondent no.1-Tehsildar Sitarganj along with recovery charges etc. The first quarterly instalment shall be payable by 10th day of March 2011 and the subsequent instalments shall fall due by the 10th day of the month after every three months thereafter. It is made clear that in case the petitioner commits a default in payment of any of the instalments, as directed above, the respondents would be at liberty to recover the entire outstanding amount from the petitioner in lump-sum. The amount, if any, already deposited by the petitioner shall be adjusted. Accordingly, the impugned recovery citation issued by the respondent no.1 (Annexure-1 to the petition) shall not be given effect to by the respondents. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP