IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 14650 of 2011 Date of decision : 13.10.2011 Jeet Singh ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D. Khanna, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Dharmender Singh Rawat, Advocate for respondent Nos. 6 and 7. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel has submitted that since the petitioner has already sold the land in question, so, the instant writ petition becomes infructuous, which may be dismissed as such. Learned counsel for respondents did not raise any objection, in this relevant connection. In this view of the matter, the instant writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous, as prayed for. October 13, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge