IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2009 / 2ND ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 9828 of 2007(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- VIJAYAKUMAR, S/O. SATHYANESAN, AGED 50 YEARS, SAMBATH BHAVAN, KANJIRAMKULAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.T.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR ADV. SRI MANIKANTAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE CRIME RECORDS BUREAU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R.), K.S.F.E. LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE, SILVER JUBILEE BUILDINGS, STATUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE MANAGER, KERALA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, KESAVADASAPURAM BRANCH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. RESMI, D/O. INDIRA, PRATHYAZHIKOM VEEDU, VALIYAKADA, SARKARA VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.M.L.SAJEEVAN, SC, KSFE LTD. FOR R3 SRI.M.DINESH FOR R4 SMT SMITHA SUKUMAR GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C)No.9828 of 2007 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROHIBITORY ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2: THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 8.5.2006 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3: A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE STATEMENT OF RECOVERY MADE FROM THE SALARY OF THE PETITIONER FOR THE LOAN DUE TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE vgd S.SIRI JAGAN ----------------------------- WP(C) No.9828 of 2007 ----------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT The Petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging recovery proceedings for recovery of loan amounts due from the 4th respondent to the 3rd respondent for which the petitioner was one of the sureties. The learned counsel for the 3rd respondent submits that the principal debtor has completedly paid off the loan amount and the loan account has been closed. In view of the said statement, no further action can be taken for the recovery of the said amount from the petitioner. In the above circumstances recording the submission of the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent, the above this writ petition is closed. S.SIRI JAGAN JUDGE vgd