*1* wp.1619.11.921.sxw kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1619 OF 2011 Mrs.Albina Ferro Georgy. ..Petitioner -Versus- The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others. ..Respondents .......... Ms.Sumedha Rao, for the Petitioner. Ms.T.Puranik, for the Respondents/BMC. Ms.Priya Ranade i/b Kadwania & Company, for the intervener. .......... CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date : 13th September, 2011. P.C.: 1 The Petitioner states that her application for regularization has not been considered by the authority, namely, the Executive Engineer (Building Proposal) of the Municipal Corporation. 2 During the course of argument, it is submitted that the original plan is available and the Petitioner is ready and willing to produce the same, so also, comply with other requirements which have been stipulated in the letter dated 17.11.2009. 3 In my view, it is not for this Court to consider and decide as to whether, any construction which is found to be either irregular or illegal, is capable of regularization or not. These are disputed questions and this Court is not appropriate forum to decide the same. Since the grievance is made that the request for regularization has not been considered although the Petitioner is ready and willing to produce the documents, the interest of justice would be served if it is directed that this *2* wp.1619.11.921.sxw Writ Petition be treated as a representation of the Petitioner seeking regularization of the subject structure and if the Petitioner is ready and willing to produce necessary documents and plan, the concerned Executive Engineer shall look into the same and pass appropriate order on or before 15th November, 2011. The Petitioner shall appear before the Executive Engineer and produce necessary documents on 22nd September, 2011 at 03:00 p.m.. 4 The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)