IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 14357 of 2010 ========================================== Rahul Kumar Jha s/o Ramanuj Jha, r/o village – Sonholi, P.S. – Sangrampur, District – Munger ………. Petitioner Versus 1. The Union Of India through the Ministry of Railways, New Delhi, 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Railways, Rail Mantralaya, New Delhi 3. The Railway Board, through its Secretary, Ministry of Railways, New Delhi 4. I.R.C.T.C., through its Secretary, New Delhi 5. The Secretary, I.R.C.T.C., New Delhi 6. The Secretary, Department of Public Undertaking, Govt. of India, New Delhi ……………. Respondents =================================================== APPEARANCE For the Petitioner : Mr. Ebrahim Kabir, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. A. Amanullah, Advocate Mr. Anil Singh, Advocate ================================================= CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2 3/9/2010 The petitioner, a self-acclaimed public spirited person, has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution allegedly in public interest. The grievance of the petitioner is in respect of food caterred to the Railway passengers. According to the petitioner, Catering Policy 2010 has been framed by the Government of India, Ministry of Railways, contrary to the Cabinet decision to establish Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation for catering food to the Railway passengers. We hardly see any reason to interfere with the Catering Policy adopted by the Railways. Nothing 2 arbitrary has been pointed out in the Policy. The Policy cannot be altered for appeasing individual passenger. The petition is rejected summarily. Neyaz/ ( R. M. Doshit,CJ.) ( Jyoti Saran, J.)