IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28203 of 2009 1. VIJAY KUMAR,son of Sri Ram Prasad Ram 2. Ram Prasad Ram, son of late Sukhu Ram 3. Khatrani Devi,wife of Sri Ram Prasad Ram 4. Ajay Ram,son of Sri Ram Prasad Ram 5. Govind Ram,son of Sri Ram Prasad Ram 6. Narayan Ram,son of Sri Ram Prasad Ram 7. Anita Devi,wife of Ajay Ram 8. Nisa Devi,wife of Govind Ram All resident of South Lodipur,P.S.- Kako,District-Jehanabad. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Bibha Devi,wife of Vijay Kumar,resident of South Lodipur,P.S.-Kako,District- Jehanabad. ----------- 02/ 15-09-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. I fail to understand that after finding all the points in favour of the petitioners why their prayer for bail has been refused by the learned Sessions Judge. No doubt, in the case torture has been alleged for demand of Rs.50,000/- but defence on behalf of the petitioners is that matrimonial case was there filed on behalf of the husband earlier to filing of this case basing complainant’s illicit relation with her brother-in-law, otherwise also all the family members including father-in-law, mother-in-law, Bhainsur, Dewars and Gotanies have been made accused in the case. According to the learned counsel, it is surprising that younger sisters-in-law (Gotanies) are not tortured in the family, how the elder would be ill-treated or tortured. In the discussed and suggested facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a 2 copy of this order in Complaint Case No.199/2008, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Satya Narayan Sinha, S.D.J.M., Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )