1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.151/2011 IN WRIT PETITION No. 5059/2010. Chandrapal Ramsamuz Tripathi -VERSUS- Mahipal Ramsamuz Tripathi _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : 06.06.2011. Heard Shri S.D. Khati, the learned Counsel for the appellant. Contention is, the temporary injunction as claimed is not falling within the forecorners of the reliefs claimed in the plaint. We have perused the prayer clause of the plaint. The relief is of eviction of the present appellant. It is apparent that if such relief is granted, the temporary injunction granted will not be required. The Courts have considered the controversy correctly 2 and the learned Single Judge of this Court has found the consideration in accordance with law. There is no jurisdictional error or perversity. Letters Patent Appeal is thus rejected. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Rgd