^ ^itsgft^ B^n IN THE HON/BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Wnt Petition f227^ No. O §3/ 2008 CS.B.) ^ PETITIONER Non-Applicant No. 3 'The Oriental Insurance A^.., ^ ..•—••"5^ \< ^v- .^<" RESPONDENTS CLAIMANTS Non-ADDlicant No. 1 Company, Bust Stand, Near Rajeev Plaza, Bilaspur, Tahsil & Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Narendra Kaser, S/o Sitaram Kaser, aged about 28 years. 2. Pawan Kaser, S/o Narendra Kaser, aged about 11/2 years. Through- Guardian father Narendra kaser Both R/o. In-front of Gudakhu Factory Choti Koni, P.S. - Koni, Tahsil & Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Kulwant Singh, S/o Preetam Singh, aged about 41 years, R/o. Radhika Nagar, Qtr. No.34/12, P.S. Supela, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Non-Applicant No. 2 4. Yashwant Prasad ^. ;':?-'^f ^ •"- Chowdhary, aged about 24 years, S/o Nanaji Chowdhary, R/o Kailash Nagar Jaipur (Rajasthan) Present add.- Radhika Nagar Qtr. No. 34/12 P.S. Supela, Distt.- Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ -HC-22 y ^ spn^T-^r f<rli<=h 3Tli?T 5t)^licb ^Ra "5^ ^1<4H<4, ^Tll<l4l<o, fa<ni<l1< ^f^) M6 4783/0^ ^"•••••••-•'••"^••••••"••^•"^ 200 ^re^T* ^IHCT WNI^ 377ct^T '^'^T^R <lf^a SB: HOH. BHRI JUSTICB N 17-12-2090 A<&v, Adv lalm Shri A.K. Atlialey, Shri J.K. Shastri, Heard. The instant petitionl 24-10-2008 passed by t^e Tribunal, Bilaspur in Cla^m whereunder, the petition^ 17 of C.P.C. for amendmebt rejected. As per the petiUon^r, fhe owner of the vehicle petitioner /Insurance the ground of dishonour of aoiendment applicati(|n. ground of delay. Hence Shri Afhaley, learn^ that learned Tribunal At this stage, Shri resptiudents No. 1 and aUowed directing the expeditiously. thjis CM^t<rt4l<l 'RW^ff "^ fe^t <py|<^i< ^)'3rf;W3H^T K, AGARWAL r. for the petitioner. . for ti.ie respondents No. 1 and 2. is directed against the ordcr dated g Additional Motor Accldent Clauns Case No. 20/2008, whereby and sr's application under Order 6 Rule in the written statement has been Cc^npany ion^r, the cheque of premium given by Ivas dishonoured and, therefore, fhe in order to take defence ou |>f cheque sought amendment by way ;ati(|n. The Tribunal rejected it on tlie petition. ^sd counsel for fhe petitiQner submits hasj wrongly dismissed the application. LK. Shastri, leamed counsel for the submits that this petition may be Tribunal to decide the case c C-22 3TTcST'5FT f^wsnlST 5b^ict» <ii^a '3~s?';^izn^zr,'S^FTS, fa^i^y 3TTif?r '^^K HW^^ 5b*licb_..S..Z'^.7^?^ 7 85/3g ^.....w.^....i....v^.^......^.^ 200 - fSR^T' ^TT^T'?^ITW^Tf?TT Since the prayer is! impugned is quashed and permit the petitioner to ujicp] prefen'ed by it vide Annextire the claim case as early as| of 3 months from the datel order. No order as to costs. not opposed, therefore, the order |tis directed that the Tribmial shall ujicprporate tlie said amendment as P-3 aiid then proceed to decide Ipossible preferably withm a period of receipt of a certified copy of this chNfd^l'1 ^i*i<nT ^^S <rai^i< ^3rf;W3TI^T Sd/- N.K.AgarwaI Judge [Ti^ ^Fo^