IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11322 of 2009 RAHUL ANAND @ SHAMI KHAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 03.09.2009 Petitioner is one of the persons who came to be arrested in Kotwali P S Case No. 92 of 2008 which was instituted under sections 399 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. From the material and investigation including the order of the court below there is evidence to show that the petitioner has been identified in a test identification parade, which was held and even looted articles have been recovered. Contention of the counsel is that petitioner is a young, college student and some persons accused with the petitioner have been enlarged on bail. But from paragraph 117 of the case diary it has emerged that there are large number of cases against the petitioner of similar kinds instituted in several police stations of Patna extending from Patliputra, Budha Colony, S K Puri etc. In fact, in one case of 2005 he stands convicted. The contention of the counsel, therefore, that petitioner is innocent soul who has been falsely implicated belies. Petitioner is a hard core criminal and his only source of income is committing crime at the costs of innocent citizens. In this view of the matter, it is a fit case in which trial should be expedited. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)