IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 25931 of 2008 Between: Panyam Rama Krishna Reddy S/o.Venkata Reddy H.No.5/200, Main Road, Gadivemula (V&M), Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Kurnool District. Kurnool. 2 Tahasildar, Gadivemula, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction declaring the inaction of the respondent in failng to pass necessary orders and communicating the same in R.C.No.B/44/08 dt. 19.5.2008 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unfair and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to pass reasoned orders quickly and pass such other or further orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.VENGALA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.25931 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner is resident of Gadivemula Village and Mandal in Kurnoor District. He is allegedly owner of land admeasuring Acs.5.41 in survey Nos.691, 693, 694, 695/1 and 696/2 situated at Bilakalagudur Village, Gadivemula Mandal, Kurnool District. Second respondent herein initiated action under the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977. A notice in Form II dated 19.05.2008 was issued by second respondent to the petitioner calling upon him to show cause as to why he should not summarily be evicted from the land as he is transferee of assigned land. The petitioner submitted explanation. The matter is still pending before second respondent. In the meanwhile it is alleged that there is threat of dispossession and that a cloud is created over the property. Therefore, he filed instant writ petition seeking a direction to second respondent to dispose of the matter. After getting instructions from second respondent, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignments) submits that the allegation that second respondent is interfering with possession of the petitioner is not correct and that the matter is still pending. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing second respondent to conduct enquiry and pass appropriate orders within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 27th November, 2008 Note: Issue CC by tomorrow. (B/o) GHN To 1 The District Collector, Kurnool District. Kurnool. 2 Tahasildar, Gadivemula, Kurnool District. 3 2CCs to GP for Revenue 4 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KURR}