IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10497 of 2010 RANDHIR BHARTIYA @ RANDHIR BHARTI son of Sitaram Poddar, resident of village Chora Tabhaka, Police Station Bibhutipur, District Samastipur, ….Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR… …OPPOSITE PARTY For the Petitioner: Mr.Ram Briksha Singh Pahepuri, Adv. For the State: Mr. U.S.P. Singh, APP ----------- 3 12.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is in custody and seeks bail in a case registered under sections 420, 467, 468, 469 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the allegation as set up in the first information report, the petitioner had made changes in the marksheet for the purpose of getting a job on the post of Panchayat Teacher. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there had already been much atonement on the part of the petitioner, as dismissal of the petitioner from the service as well as realization of the salary have been recommended by the authority concerned. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 23.01.2010. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner appending therewith 2 a copy of the chargesheet, which was submitted on 31.01.2010. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the abovenamed petitioner, RANDHIR BHARTIYA @ RANDHIR BHARTI, to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera (District Samastipur) in Bibhutipur Police Station Case No. 156/2009 with further condition that one of the bailors must be close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall state on affidavit before the court concerned, giving complete genealogy, as to how he is related with the petitioner. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial and if the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates in course of trial without any reasonable cause shown by him, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)