IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BxLASPUR(c.G.) WRIT pETITIOMC) No. 1/30} OF 2007 gggITIGNER : / Rajendra Kumar Yadav,son of shri Chhote Lal Yadav.aged about 38 years,re5ident o£ Village-Kepa POSt-B aht arai ,Te hsil-T akhatpur , District Eilaspur(C.G.)' VERSUS ‘gESPONDENTs : state of Chhattisgarh, through Directcr ,Panchayat ,Chhatisgarh , Raipur ,(C.G.‘) z 2. Collector .Bilaspur, District—Bilaspur(C.G.) /3. Vishnu Yadav,son of Rathram Yxadav aged about 42 years; Ex. Sarpanch,Gram Panchayat Ude 1a .Tehsil-T akhatpur , District~Bilaspur,(C. G.) / 4 . Naib—Te hsildar , Te hs il—s akr i , District—Bilaspur(C. G.) 2i?“ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22%03‘ THE CONsTITUTION /h or INDIA. “I- T _.I.I\I._..I,. “WI..7I,,,.i.r_r.,..,"mm.“ ‘ w, “ PETITIONFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETiTiON (C) NO.1301 OF 2007 Rajendra Kumar Yadav Versus State of Chhattisgarh & others (Writ Petition under Articie 227 of the Constitution of lndia) ‘ Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. ., i Present :- Ms. Indira Tripathi, Advoc RESPONDENTS ate for the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panei Lawyer for the State. ORDER {ORAL} (Passed on this 17‘“ day or June; 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for permission to withdraw the petition as th'e same has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/ State has no objection. Hence, the petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. / Sd/- g‘ Satish K. Agnihotri i the petitioner seeks l Judge l ll ashok j”