IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18758 of 2010 SURESH PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 10.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. There are irregularities in purchasing the articles. The allegation is that lesser articles were supplied and payments were made to the supplier. Submission is that later it appeared that irregularities were there in purchase of articles without approval of purchase committee. Articles were supplied by Ankur Trading Corporation, payment was not made who approached this Court in C.W.J.C.No. 11476 of 2002, was disposed of on 9.4.2004 with a direction to make payment after verifying irregularities and that was paid also. Materials were purchased, decided by Purchase Committee for the earlier financial year held on 30.3.1999 and that was lesser than the present market price. Petitioner was authorized also by earlier decision of Purchase Committee to purchase articles in exigency. Lastly it is submitted that if any offence is made out, not justifying refusal of anticipatory bail. Thus, having regard to the facts and 2 circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda in Laheri P.S. Case No. 128 of 2005, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)