IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2009 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 34517 of 2009(O) -------------------------- OS.150/2009 of SUB COURT,NEYYATTINKARA .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- RAJA RATNAM, AGED 63, S/O.ANTHANAYYA, DOOR NO.25, M.C.NICHOLAS ROAD, CHENNAI-31. BY ADV. SRI.K.MUHAMMED SALAHUDHEEN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. L.WILSON, AGED 60, S/O.LAZAR NADAR, OLATHAN AVIKUZHY VEETTIL, KADAVATTARAM DESOM, NEYYATTINKARA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. R.MURUGAN, AGED 55, S/O.P.RATNA SWAMI, CHAIRMAN, MARY MATHA EDUCATION SOCIETY, RAJCOT, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.34517 OF 2009 -------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of December 2009 ---------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT Petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S No.150 of 2009 on the file of Sub Court, Neyyattinkara. Suit is for recovery of money for a sum of Rs.1,10,00,000/- (Rupees one crore ten lakh only). Suit was instituted as against the first defendant as the sole defendant. Subsequently the second respondent got himself impleaded in the suit. The only relief canvassed in the suit is the issuing of a writ/direction/order to the court below for an expeditious disposal of the suit after trial. 2. A report from the learned Sub Judge was called for. It is reported that the first defendant, the sole defendant earlier, had conceded to the suit claim, but, the second defendant who claimed to be the present Chairman of the educational society, for the welfare of which the amount is stated to have been advanced as loan, had filed a W.P.(C).No.34517 OF 2009 Page numbers written statement disputing the suit claim contending that it is a collusive suit. Considering the report and taking note of the submissions made, I find it may not be proper and appropriate for this court to fix any time frame for disposal of the suit. Petitioner can approach the court below and espouse his grievance for an early disposal of the suit. If any such request is made, the court below shall consider it, and subject to the pendency of the old cases before the cour dispose of the suit as early as possible. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed. Sd/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE vdv W.P.(C).No.34517 OF 2009 Page numbers