-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10287 OF 2010 Padmakar Heera Mhatre ... Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents Mr. R.D. Suryawanshi for the petitioner. Ms. S.S. Bhende, AGP, for respondent Nos. 1, 3 to 5. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & A.A. SAYED , JJ. DATE: JANUARY 13, 2011. P.C. It is pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that even though the petitioner’s land is not acquired under the Act, a wrong entry is made in the revenue records showing that the land is acquired under the Act. If that is so, the petitioner is permitted to make an appropriate representation to the revenue authority for deleting such a wrong entry by pointing out the correct facts. The aforesaid representation be made within a period of two weeks from today. If any representation is made by the petitioner to the concerned authority within the aforesaid period, the concerned authority, after considering the question as to whether the entry in the revenue records is wrongly made or not, may decide the same and to find out whether the entry is rightly or wrongly posted. If it is ultimately found that the entry is wrongly -2- made, an appropriate decision for deleting the said wrong entry may be taken within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of representation. However, this aspect is entirely left to the concerned authority. The decision so arrived at may be communicated to the petitioner immediately thereafter. 2. Subject to what is stated above, the petition is disposed of. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. A.A. SAYED, J.