5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 267/2010 % SHER SINGH DAGAR ..... Petitioner STATE & ANR CORAM: Through: Mr. Puneet Ahluwalia, Adv. versus ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, Adv. for the State. Mr. Pavan Narang, Adv. for R-2 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.L.BHAYANA ORDER 10.08.2010 This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. against the impugned order dated 1.5.2010 passed by learned trial Court by which learned trial Court has partly allowed the application of the accused and partly dismissed the same. I have gone through the impugned order passed by learned trial Court and learned trial Court has held that if supplementary charge sheet is allowed then it will cause a prejudice to the case and this may result into a de-novo trial. On the other hand learned trial Court has allowed four PWs namely Dayawati, Raj Bala, Anjali and Mohan Lal and one Nodal officer of Airtel to be examined in this case. But he has disallowed the other aspects of the supplementary charge sheet filed by the police. He has also given good reasons for rejecting the same. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Learned APP for the States submits that the order is fully justified and does not call any interference by this Court. I have gone through the impugned order and I do not find any infirmity in the order passed by learned trial Court. The revision petition stands dismissed. AUGUST 10, 2010 Kb S.L.BHAYANA,J