IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17769 of 2009 BIKRAMA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.6.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner was named in the F.I.R. but charge sheet was submitted only against four other persons, out of whom two were tried and acquitted. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that in course of the trial the witnesses deposed that none of them had seen the occurrence. Learned counsel for the petitioner also avers that subsequently the petitioner along with three others similarly situated, namely, Ram Das Gupta, Sheoji Paswan and Aziz Mian were summoned under the provisions of Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned Counsel for the petitioner further states that the other three accused persons filed the petition for anticipatory bail bearing Cr.Misc.No.15094 of 2009 which was allowed on 1.5.2009 (Annexure-7). Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. In case of surrender/arrest within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a 2 copy of this order in the court below, petitioner, namely, Bikrama Yadav shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri H.N.Gupta, Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.II, Buxar in connection with Nawanagar P.S.case No.92 of 1995 (S.T.No.137 of 2004) subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Narendra/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )