IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR FC.G.1 M.C.CNO. ^l cj ) /2011 ^' APPLICANT RESPONDENTS Dokari W/o Sri Bhagadan, Aged-about 55 years, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat- Dahida, Tahsil-Samgarh, Distt.- Raigarh [C.G.] VERSUS l.State of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretaiy, Panchayat and Social welfare department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur[C.G.] 2. Additional Collector, Raigarh, Distt.- Raigarh [C.G.] 3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Samgarh, Distt.- Raigarh [C.G.] 4. Tahsildar, Sarngarh, Distt.- Raigarh [C.G.] (Presiding officer) 5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Samgarh, Distt.- Raigarh [C.G.] 6. Smt. Manjulata W/o Raju Singh, Panch- ward no. 1, 7.8mt. Sarita W/o Umesh, Panch- ward no.2, 8. Govind S/o Jaipal, panch-ward no. 3 9. Krishno S/o Sonsai, panch-ward no. 4 10. Santosh S/o Pukram, panch-ward no. 5, 11. Santosh S/o Ramgilas, panch-ward no. 6, 12. Smt. Mohanmati W/o Lakeshwar, panch-ward no. 7, 13. Sint. Rambai w/o Devsingh, panch- ward no. 8, ^,-.W v^-^w '^^^••^^^^~^^_^^_^^_^' ^ , ^.y •^ Av 14. Smt. Lavang W/o Ramdhin, panch- ward no. 9, 15. Sahasram S/o Kalaram, panch- ward no. 10, 16. Smt. Ganeshi w/o Hiradas, panch- ward no. 11, 17. Smt. Chitralekha w/o Labho, panch ward no. 12, 18. Smt. Guruwari W/o panchram, panch ward no. 13, 19. Tiharu S/o Parasu, panch-ward no. 14, 20. Smt. Dhanbai W/o Devram, panch- ward no. 15, 21. Tumanlal S/o Dhandhu, panch- ward no. 16, 22. Lakeshwar S/o Awadh, panch-ward no. 17, 23. Smt. Sonai W/o Bhouriya, panch- ward no. 18, 24. Chhedilal S/o Nanhu, pach-ward no. 19, 25. Smt. Nirabai W/o Fulsai, panch- ward no. 20, All from 6 to 25 are the R/o Gram Panchayat-Dahida, tahsil-Sarngarh, Distt.- Raigarh [C.G.]. APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF W.P. C.no. 2932/2011 HIGN COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BtLASPUR M.C.C.No.791 OF 2011 \^ Applicant : Dokari VERSUS Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh & Others APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF W.P.(C) N0.2932/2011 SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Preseni: 1. Shri Sanjay Patel, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Arun Sao, Govemment Advocate for theState. Shri Ratan Pusty, Advocate for the caveator. ORDER (Passed on this25tn day of November, 201 1) Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the counsel for the petitioner could not appear on account of bonafide mistake, therefore, W.P.(C) No.2932/2011, which was dismissed on 20.10.2011, may be restored to its file. 2. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P.(C). No.2932/2011, is restored tothe original file, subject to payment of a sum of Rs.1500/- to the High Court Legal Aid Committee. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record of the original writ petition and the same be listed for h^aring. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok