1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7814 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.7814 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.7814 OF 2004 Bhaskar Kashinath Durge .. Petitioner. Vs. Kashinath Genu Durge & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.V.P.Tapkir for the petitioner. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2004 DATED : 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2004 DATED : 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2004 P.C.: . Heard Mr.Tapkir, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In view of the observations made in paragraph 4 of the impugned order dated 5.8.2004, no interference at the instance of the petitioner is called for in the petition. It is clear from the observations made in the paragraph that without amendment the petitioner can lead evidence regarding developments made in the suit property. The petition, therefore, fails and is dismissed as such. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)