WP(C) 5430/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. K.SHARMA Heard Mr. Mannaf, learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for t he respondents. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the appoin tment of the respondent No. 5 as Anganwadi Helper in Itapara Lalung Basti Anganw adi Centre. According to the petitioner, the respondent No. 5 is not the residen t of the said Anganwadi Centre, but as per the requirement of the scheme for app ointment of Anganwaid Worker/Helper, a candidate must be a resident of the Angan wadi Centre for his/her appointment. According to the petitioner, the responden t No. 5 is not a resident of the said Anganwadi Centre. In the counter affidavit, filed by the respondent No. 5, the aforesaid s tand of the petitioner has been denied. In paragraph -9 of the counter affidavit , it has been stated that the respondent No. 5 belongs to Itapara Lalung Basti Anganwadi Centre. In this Connection, she has referred to the certificate issued by the concerned Gaoburah and Ward Member. The respondent No. 5 has also referr ed to the voter list pertaining to both the petitioner and the respondent No. 5 as per which the name of the respondent No. 5 appeared in the voter list of Itap ara Lalung Gaon No. 4, whereas the name of the petitioner appeared in the voter list of Mazarati No. 1 under which the particular Anganwadi Centre is allegedly not situated. The aforesaid plea of the respondent No. 5 has not been denied by the pe titioner by filing any affidavit in reply. In view of the above, this court is not inclined to make further roving enquiry as to the residence of the petitioner as well as the respondent No. 5. It is an admitted position that pursuant to the selection of the respondent No. 5, she has already joined her service. The writ petition is disposed of.