-i?^: 11 i '^::s: ^: ,(^..,^ :.5j ':' ^ a| "!> (,S ^ 1 -d a- a) A " &4. 31 'f' -r^ ^) •e( :M: et 3: gt 3' 1 ri ^ ^ 4 ", 4f ^ ^. ^, g|,.a| ^p 'a^ -^ -<d ^l Ad 4 SJ. 4 ? t 3 SHB ^. HiGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (81 No. 1564 of2003 Pfctitioner Ram Siagh Vcrsus Respondents StateofCtahatli^aA&anottter SB: Hon^te Ma-. JusticeftaUrii K. Agnfllotrl, J Shri Samer Sahu, Advc»catEforfhe petituaer. Shri Sushfl. Dubey, GoivemmentAdvocateforfhercspoDdeiits. ORDBR (Passsed on this 13d1 day ofFcbniaiy, 2007) 1. By fhis petitjon, ttoe petitioner, who has woriffid for inDre (han 15 yeais as Gangman seeks a relief that the petittoiffir being permaHcnt ganginan be letued at ibe s^e of 62 years ia accoidaDce wifh thc Chhattisgarh. ^ifaskya, ScvalE (Adhivarshild-Ayu) Adhm.yam, 1967 ( fbr short the Aet, 1967^ rrad with Fumlamental Rute (for sbort 'F.R.t 56. 2. The Hidisputatrieficts are that the pedtiouer was emplogBed as gangmaa in ibcyear 1965 aad he was retfeed fixna seineew.e.fii 30.4.2003 onattaiaing ttie 30 yeara service. Acc»?3ding to leamed couasel for fhe petitioner, fhe petitioner attaiaed tte status ofpennaaent cmptoyee, as deGned under Rule 2((^ crfttte Chhattisgarii i(Woito3faai'gcd and GtMrimgpncy Paid E^nployee^ Pcnsion Rutes, 1979 ( for short fhe Rutes, 1879^, fiamed under Artiete 309 of fhe CSonstitutiMt oflndia. Afler having BttEdneld! (he status af fhe peHaanent; emptoyec ffae petitioneT woulH. retireoaattauui]®(Iieageof62year3onsup0iwi&uation^t^^ fhe piovisions (rfthe Act, 1967. 3. ff Leamed counsel appearingfi>rfhe pefttioa.cr would subinit fhat the casc of the petitioBer is sqiiarety coyered by the decisfon of this Conrt passed on 4*h Jamiary, 2007 in W.P. No. 108/200S (Govind Vs. State of Chhattisgarlr & ofhfirs) axtd other connected niatters. Leamed coiinsel appeanng for the respondents/State does not dispute fhe subnussions made by leamed oounsel for the petittoncr. Accordiagfy, flie petitioner, who is permaaent gattgaian, is eutifled to retire on attainit^ •ttie age of 62 years in accordance wifh fhe Act, 1967. The petitron isacconlmgty disposed of. No order as to costs. -~—^^— SatishK;,Agnihotri __Judge Thakur