Petitiome; Respona’ems ?) 3) HEGH aGURT SF CHHATTI3GEXRH: BSLA§?UR Writ Pet§tion N0. 22§ m‘ 2m}? Kama? (mane! Gaga Sm. $hr% Hari Gevind Gupta, C/o‘ M/s‘ Kama! Kirana Stores, Gariabaad, District Raipur. Versus Sfate of Chhat‘iisgarh, thmugh the Secreiary, MinisHy 0f Fares; ”grad Kaiyan SJngh Bhawan, Raméz‘‘f’: The Conservator or” Forest Raipur Six/£3505, Raimr. Sub Divisional afficer énd Presiding Officer, Gariaband, Dismci Raégauf. (Pet§tion under Articie 226/227 of ihe Consiiiution of mdia) SB: Hcn‘iole Shri Justice Satish K. Agmho’gri Pfeseni: A. gx: None appears for ihe petitioner. GRia G§BE§§ {passed an 3“ May, 2am The matter is caiSed for hearing iwice. On bath occasions, none appears nor any repfeseniation is made on behaif of- ihe pet§tionen in view of ihe above! this writ goetitson is dismiesed for wanf of prosecutmn. g. Sd/— Satish K. Agniham Ju’dge i