IN TH” HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI$GARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Writ petition No. 12 J % g 2002 Deodhar Verma, aged ab ut 22 years, 5/0 late Shri Dindaya‘; Verma, v 3/ R/o Village and Post - Selud Distt. DURG (C.G.) . E’etitioner Versu3 . *z Respcnde ts — ( Chairman, Q} , édhya Pradesh Electricity Board, ’$hakti Bhawan, “ox”. (“Qt {$9 V ‘. Rampur, Jabalpur (M.P.) ‘3 “W wN $1 ?"\ \ (2) Chairman chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Dangania — Raipur. (3) Executive Engineer (Workshop) DN Chbattisgarh State Electricity Board, Bhilai-3, Distt. DURG. thrggqh - ReSpQJ1/c?“ent No.3_ V PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTI‘IUTION OF INDIA FOE IHE. ISSU3>NCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE GF MANDAMUS OR CERTIORARY OR PROHIBITIDN AND OR WRIT OT? ANY OTHER NATURE NATURE «AND/OR ORDER OR DIRECTION; .£.¢i MW J W " 26—3-2604 Shri R. M. Pandey. counsel fof the pet§tianet Shri BhaskarPyasi, Panel La 3 er§er re$pondentNo‘3. Heard both the ccuhsel. The petitioner has préferre this writ petition under.,Articles 22af227 of the Canstitution af lndia erehy the petitioner has iarayed fer directing the teependents t0 conei er and appoint the petitiener en compaeeienate greund.‘ The petitioner's case is that his father was wetking under the reeeondent No.1 as Attendant Gr.—i nci his father whiie serving under Superintendent Engineer (Workshap) Bhiiai had expired en 13-1 1—99. On 17-12-99, the petitiener had‘submitt‘e an application for appointment en The sa a‘ppiication was forwarded to compassionate ground. Superintendent Engineer, Durg. Th petitioner had centacted to varieus’ offices of respendent Net to know he status of his appiication. But. respondent No.1 kept the applicatio of the petitioner pending without any reasonabie ground. Learned couneei for the petiti er suiomitted that respondent Ne.2 has issued appointment. orders in respect of 31 persons on compassionate ground. Counsei f rther submitted that the petitioner may be aiiowed to make a repres ntation to respondents 1 & 2 and respondents 1 & 2 may be directed o decide the representation of the petitioner toad/Non the learned so nsel for respondent No.3 has no objection. Having heard'thewiearned c unsel for the/parties and having. regard to the facts and circumsta oes of the case, the, petitioner is XI-HC-22 XI—HC-22 mmawrga ,3;— i aliewed t0 make a dataiied represe WW @W #Wm With the aforesaid dii'ections, 1 ' Parties are entiiled fer certifiec esentaticn ef the petitiener wiihin a ef receipt of the representation petitioner and wiii pass a regsoned i 3% ntatéen raising an hés grievances to respondents 1&2 within a pemd a 10 days from teday ansi in \turn, fewamdenfs 1&2 wiii ciacide the rep p$iisiad ef 30 days from the date ccn3idéring aii {he grievances of the crcier. in view of this order. LA. Ne.959?l2003 stands disposed ef. hie writ petitien is diseosed er. eepy of this erder. / edi- i L.c.BHADOO \ Judge i i i BarvelSunita