1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2618 OF 2010 RATAN VITTHAL KULKARNI AGE : 45 OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O : KARMAD TQ. & DIST . :AURANGBAD .... PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY INDUSTRIES, ENERGYAND LABOUR DEPARTMENT, MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI. 2. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND COLLECTOR OF STAPMS, MAHARASHTRA STATE, PUNE,GROUND FLOOR , OPP. VIDHAN BHAVAN (COUNCIL HALL) NEW ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING PUNE. 3. DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AURANGABAD DIVISION CENTRAL ADMIN. BUILDING 2ND FLOOR, COLLECTOR OFFICE COMPOUND, AURANGABAD. 4. REGIONAL OFFICER, M.I.D.C.,AURANGABAD .... RESPONDENTS 2 Mr.M.S.Karad, Advocate holding for Mr. S.S.Thombre, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.G.Patil, AssistantGovt. Pleader for State. Mr. S.S.Dande, Advocate for respondent no. 4. CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE OF JUDGMENT : 05/05/2010 ORAL JUDGMENT : ( PER – S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the communication of the respondent, denying the registration of the instrument of conveyance submitted by the petitioner. 3. It transpires that the Circular, by virtue of which the sale deed was not being registered, came to be withdrawn by the respondents pursuant to the Circular dated 10/2/2010. In view of the fact that the said Circular has been withdrawn, there is no impediment for the authorities to register the instrument of conveyance. We direct the respondents to effectuate registration of instrument of conveyance, if presented by the petitioner and if otherwise it complies with all other legal requirements. 3 4. Rule is thus made absolute on the above terms with no order as to costs. [ S.V.GANGAPURWALA ] [ P.V.HARDAS ] JUDGE JUDGE knp/WP 2618.10 ( J )