CRM-M No.11105 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRM-M No.11105 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.04.2011 Tej Pal ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana for the State. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.89 dated 25.3.2011 under Sections 420/120-B IPC and 37/51/52/63/65/68-A of Copy Right Act, 1957, P.S. DLF Qutab Enclave, Gurgaon. On 13.4.2011, this Court has passed the following order:- “Counsel for the petitioner contends that vide letter dated CRM-M No.11105 of 2011 2 3.1.2011, the petitioner has informed their cable operators that they will not be relaying the posts channel like ESPN, Star Sports and Star Cricket as no mutual agreement had been signed. Thereafter, FIR was registered on 25.3.2011 and the allegation was that Mr. Tejpal Singh Sejwal, was indulging in unauthorised distribution of signals without payment of subscription fee, causing a huge loss of revenue and making wrongful gains to themselves by unauthorised use of the services i.e. access the service without authorisation. Counsel for the petitioner contends that he has no control over the cable operators if they at their own level without the knowledge of the petitioner through a technology known as 'trap' on telecast the programme of these channels for the viewers and are causing violation of copyright and offence under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC. Keeping in view the fact and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is allowed anticipatory bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Gurgaon. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in compliance of the order dated 13.4.2011, petitioner had surrendered before the Chief Judicial Magistrate on 25.4.2011 and he has already been enlarged on bail. Learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, has opposed the bail application. Since misuse of anticipatory bail is not reported, present petition is allowed. Order dated 13.4.2011 is made absolute, with the rider CRM-M No.11105 of 2011 3 that petitioner – accused shall participate in the investigation as and when he is required. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 27.04.2011 sk.