IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 9622 of 2008 Decided on: 21.4.2011 Balbir Singh Banyal …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioners : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Addl, Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner prays for and is permitted to make a representation on the basis of seniority granted to him as per Demobilised Armed Force Personnel (Reservation of vacancies in Himachal Pradesh State Non-Technical Services) Rules, 1972. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make representation to the Principal Secretary (Education) to the Government of H.P., within a period of three weeks from today. Thereafter, the same shall be decided by the Principal Secretary (Education) in accordance with law by passing a speaking/detailed order, within a further period of two months. In the eventuality of the representation being allowed, the petitioner shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge April 21, 2011 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No (K. Attri)