IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32556 of 2008 1. Vidya Nand Prasad Rai, Son of Ruplal Rai, Resident of Village Lahaladpur. 2. Suresh Rai, Son of Ramdeo Rai, Resident of Village Punas. 3. Dharamdeo Rai, Son of Mushar Rai, Resident of Village Kothia. 4. Bhola Rai, Son of Sukan Rai, Resident of Village Punas. 5. Lal Babu Rai, Son of Raj Mangal Rai, Resident of Village Punas. 6. Sonalal Rai, Son of Methur Rai, Resident of Village Kothia. 7. Naresi Singh, Son of Yamuna Singh, Resident of Village Punas. 8. Arun Singh, Son of Satya Narain Singh, Resident of Village Lahaladpur. 9. Kailas Rai, son of Ram Bilash Rai, Resident of Village Punas. 10. Lalu Rai, Son of Sarvan Rai, Resident of Village Kothia. 11. Sadhu Rai, Son of Yadolal Rai, Resident of Village Punas. 12. Jagarnath Rai, Son of Nandlal Rai, Resident of Village Punas. 13. Jagdish Singh, Son of Shiv Narain Singh, Resident of Village Punas. 14. Vilas Rai, Son of Dangar Rai, Resident of Village Pipra. All are under PS Madhuban, District East Champaran ---- Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar ---- Opposite Party ----------- 2 30.6.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 15.9.2004 passed by the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, taking cognizance for offences alleged to have been committed under Sections 302 and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act. The order of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Motihari indicates that he relied on several paragraphs of the case diary and has come to the conclusion that a prima facie case is made out against the petitioners. Similarly, the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. V, Motihari has discussed the legality of the order of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Motihari and has found that there is no illegality in the order impugned. Considering that both the Court have come to a 2 concurrent finding that a prima facie case is made out against the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the orders impugned. This application is dismissed. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)