IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM No.M-20907 of 2011(O & M) Date of decision : 13.7.2011 Aman Nuri and another ........Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present:- Mr.Navin Batra, Advocate, for the petitioners --- AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) : Learned counsel contends that petitioner No.1 belongs to Scheduled Caste. Petitioner No.1 got married to Petitioner No.2. The marriage has not been accepted by respondents No.4 to 19 who are all relatives of petitioner No.1. The petitioners plead that they are of marriageable age and got married. I have considered the contention of the learned counsel. This petition is disposed of with directions to SSP, Hoshiarpur to consider a copy of the petition as a representation and issue appropriate directions as required by law so as to ensure protection of life and liberty of the petitioners. This order, however, shall not construed as to mean that the petitioners are of marriageable age or that the petitioners in fact got married. This order further does not clothe the petitioners with any protection against arrest in case either or both of the petitioners are involved in commission of any cognizable offence. (AJAI LAMBA) JUDGE 13.7.2011 akm