IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2007 / 12TH SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 15902 of 2005(R) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN IN OS 791/1998 IN EP.8/2003 of MUN-MAGI COURT, N.PARAVOOR .................... PETITIONER: ------------ ARJUNAN, S/O.KODIYAN, AGED 65 YEARS, SANKARADITHARA HOUSE, CHERAI, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. GEETHA LINARAJ, W/O.LINARAJ, VARISSERY HOUSE, CHERAI, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK. 2. VINAYA RAJ, S/O.LINARAJ, VARISSERY HOUSE, CHERAI, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK. 3. VINEETHE RAJ, S/O.LINARAJ, VARISSERY HOUSE, CHERAI, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO.15902/2005/R -2- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT. P1: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30/1/2004 IN E.P. 8/03 IN E.A. 400/03 IN O.S. 791/98 OF THE HON'BLE MUNSIFF COURT, PARAVUR. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE JP PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.15902 of 2005 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of August , 2007 JUDGMENT The counsel for the petitioner is not able to answer the query as to whether the petitioner has complied with the condition imposed by this court while granting stay. I assume that the condition has not been complied with by the petitioner. It is also seen that the petitioner has not remitted the process also. The writ petition will stand dismissed on the reason that the petitioner, who obtained interim relief from this court suffering conditions did not comply with the conditions. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. dpk