IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52266 of 2008 SUKHDEO PRASAD … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri ShakeelAhmad Khan, Sr.Adv. For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta, APP ----------- 3. 6.1.2009 Heard. The Court is not inclined, after hearing learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, to review its earlier order dated 30.7.2008 in Cr. Misc. No. 20805 of 2008. The petition is dismissed. However, the contention was that in spite of the case being committed, the trial has not begun and that the petitioner is in custody since 24.10.2007. The Court trusts, the learned trial Judge could appreciate the anxiety of the petitioner of being in custody without trial and could do what is required of him by law to, firstly, initiate the trial proceeding and then to expedite it. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)