IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.189 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.6 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax. ..Appellant. Vs. M/s. Revion Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta with P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.J.D. Mistry & Raj Darak for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED : 24th March,2008. PC : 1. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant. There is a delay of 227 days. Considering the cause shown, delay condoned. Office to number the appeal. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.) IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.6 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax. ..Appellant. Vs. M/s. Revion Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta with P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.J.D. Mistry & Raj Darak for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED : 24th March,2008. PC : 1. The question of law as framed in this appeal is also in issue in Income Tax Application No.11 of 1999 between The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Lazor Syntex Ltd. before this court which was dismissed on 11.6.2007. In the light of that, the question of law as framed would not arise and consequently the appeal dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)