IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 16639 of 2011 Date of Decision: September 07, 2011 Anokh Singh. ….Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. Brijeshwar Singh Bhalla, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Petitioner is placed under suspension vide impugned order dated 23.12.2010 on the ground that petitioner has not utilized the funds by following the proper procedure. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that there is no allegation against the petitioner that he has ever misappropriated the fund or has pocketed the same and has not utilized for the purposes for which it was shown to have been utilized. Learned counsel CWP No. 16639 of 2011 further states that utilizing the funds without following the proper procedure, is not a serious offence until and unless it is said that money is embezzled. He further states that final enquiry is yet to be initiated and concluded and, thus, petitioner cannot be placed under suspension for an indefinite period. Learned counsel has correctly stated that final enquiry be directed to be concluded within such time as fixed by this Court so that petitioner may not remain under suspension for indefinite period. Present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to initiate and conclude the enquiry, in any case, within 90 days from the date certified copy of this order is placed before respondent No.2. If enquiry is not concluded within 90 days, suspension order of the petitioner shall stand revoked. However, if in the finding, charges against the petitioner are found to be proved, then authority shall be at liberty to pass appropriate order thereon, in accordance with law. September 07, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2