IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9291 of 2008 Between: 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, Health Medical & Family Welfare Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Medical Education, Govt. of A.P., Hyderbad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Dr. T.P. Gandhi, S/o. Suryanarayana Murthy, Additional Driector of Medical Education & Presently Residing 9/8 Meharnagar, M.V.P. Colony, Visakhapatnam. 2 The Accountant General (A & E) A.P. Hyderabad, .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to and connected with the orders dated 9-8-2007 in OA No. 7789/2003 on the file of the AP Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and connected with the orders dated 9-8-2007 in OA No. 7789/2003 on the file of the AP Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and to quash or set aside the same by holding as erroneous and contrary to law. Counsel for the Petitioner:GP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9291 of 2008 ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice P.Swaroop Reddy) This writ petition is filed questioning the order dated 09.08.2007 passed by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, in O.A.No.7789 of 2003, whereby and whereunder the said O.A. filed by the 1st respondent herein was allowed directing the respondents therein to conduct a review D.P.C. within four weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order and give necessary orders of notional promotion and accordingly refix and pay the pension and other retiral benefits to the 1st respondent within a period of three months from the date of conduct of review D.P.C. Thereafter, the 1st respondent filed C.A.No.118 of 2008 in O.A.No.7789 of 2003 for not implementing the said order of the Tribunal. The Tribunal by order dated 29-04-2008 in C.A.No.118 of 2008 made the following order:- “Pursuant to the summons issued, the respondents appeared and placed before this Court, the orders passed in Memo No.26476/A1/2003-5, dated 15-03-2008 which has been issued in compliance of the directions given, by considering the case of the applicant and issued speaking orders. If the applicant is aggrieved by the said orders, it is open to him to challenge the same before the appropriate Forum.” This writ petition is filed challenging the order of the O.A. and in view of the fact that the case of the 1st respondent in O.A. was considered and rejected vide Memo, dated 15-03-2008, in pursuance of the directions of the Tribunal, we are of the opinion that nothing remains in the writ petition. Therefore, the writ petition is devoid of merit and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, it is open to the 1st respondent to challenge the rejection order, dated 15-03-2008. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J _____________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J Date: 16-06-2009 Prv