IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5542 of 2011 1. Umesh Kumar Yadav @ Umesh Yadav 2. Birendra Yadav. 3. Kaushlendra Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 4 27.06.2011 Vide order dated 21.06.2011, the petitioners were granted anticipatory bail in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 89 of 2010 but due to snag in the computer, the order could not be pronounced accurately, as a result of which the fax could not be transmitted. The order dated 21.06.2011 be read as follows:- Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504 of the Indian penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The accusation against petitioner nos. 1 and 3 is to have caused firearm injury to the informant. Though, no firearm injury has been found caused to the informant. It is submitted that the occurrence took place 2 on 28.05.2010 when the fardbeyan was recorded on 02.06.2010 and the F.I.R., was ultimately registered on 07.06.2010. It is further submitted that the petitioners' side also lodged a case at earlier point of time and the petitioner no.1 has also received injury. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Arrah in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 89/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through fax at the cost of the petitioners. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)