IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WVMP.No.2049 of 2010 in WPMP.No.12373 of 2009 in/& W.P.No.9481 of 2009, WP.Nos.4580, 4588, 4860, 4873, 9430, 9437, 9488, 9513, 9599, 9617 and 9700 of 2009 Common Order: These Writ Petitions are filed for a Mandamus to declare the notices issued by respondent No.3, terminating the licenses granted in favour of the petitioners, as illegal and arbitrary. Except WVMP.No.2049 of 2010 in W.P.No.9481 of 2009, the vacate stay applications in all other Writ Petitions came up before this Court. They were extensively heard and a detailed order was passed on 21-04-2010, whereby the interim orders granted earlier on 19-03-2009 and 01-04-2009 were vacated. When WVMP.2049 of 2010 in W.P.No.9481 of 2009 came up for hearing before this Court on 10-06- 2011, Sri P.Gangarami Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Railways, who appeared for the vacate stay applicant, submitted that in pursuance of interim order, dated 21-04-2010, in the aforesaid batch of cases vacating the interim orders, all the licensees including the petitioner in W.P.No.9481 of 2009 vacated the demised premises and handed them over to the Railways and that the Railways have been proceeding with the construction of a model railway station thereon. On that date, as the learned Counsel for the writ petitioner was not present, all the Writ Petitions along with WVMP.No.2049 of 2010 were directed to be posted under the caption ‘for orders’. Accordingly, today these cases appeared under that caption. Even today, the learned Counsel for the writ petitioners is not present. I have carefully considered the submissions of Sri P.Gangarami Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Railways, appearing for the respondents in all these Writ Petitions and perused the entire material available on record. As the common order, dated 21-04-2010, in WVMP.No.3341 of 2009 in WPMP.No.6019 of 2009 in W.P.No.4580 of 2009 contains detailed reasons, it is not necessary to refer to the facts once over. Instead, it is directed that the said order shall be treated as part of this order. Even though the findings rendered in the said order are based on the prima facie satisfaction of this Court, this Court is of the opinion that the same reasons shall constitute the basis for dismissal of these Writ Petitions. Accordingly, all these Writ Petitions are dismissed. As a sequel, interim order, dated 01-05-2009, in WPMP.No.12373 of 2009 is vacated and WVMP.No.2049 of 2010 in W.P.No.9481 of 2009 is allowed. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 13th June, 2011 lur