THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.3007 of 2010 ORDER: The 2nd petitioner is the daughter and respondents 5 and 6 are the sons of the 1st petitioner. The 5th petitioner executed gift deed, dated 25.06.1992, in favour of his mother, the 1st petitioner, donating the plot of 121 square yards in survey No.207 of Narketpally Village and Mandal. The 1st petitioner, in turn, executed a gift deed in favour of her daughter, the 2nd petitioner, on 07.12.2007. Permission for construction of house is said to have been obtained. The 5th respondent got a document, dated 31.12.2009, registered, through which, he revoked a gift made in favour of the 1st petitioner. The document was registered by the Joint Sub-Registrar, Nalgonda, the 3rd respondent. The petitioners challenge the action of the 3rd respondent in admitting the deed of revocation, dated 31.12.2009, to registration. Heard Sri M.Venkatram Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. With the execution of documents, corresponding rights accrue to the parties thereto. A dichotomy exists, in this regard, as between the transactions, which take place with the participation of both the parties, and those which occur with the acts of only one of the parties. Sale deeds fall into the first category and gift deeds into the second category. Rule 26-K of the Rules made under the Registration Act was amended to the effect that a sale deed cannot be cancelled, except with the participation of both the parties thereto. The provision does not cover the gift deeds. The petitioners are not able to point out any specific provision of law, which prohibits the registration of a deed revoking the gift. Naturally an aggrieved party has to work out the remedies in a civil Court. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioners to file a suit, to work out their remedies. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.11.02.2010. GJ