THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR Criminal Petition No. 5276 of 2007 Order: This petition, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed to quash the proceedings in respect of the petitioner/A2 in C.C. No. 20 of 2007 pending on the file of the XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad. One Smt. H. Uma Rani, Senior Assistant in the office of the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests applied for home loan to M/s. Sundaram Housing Finance Limited. The said application was processed on payment of 1% of loan amount as process fee. The loan was sanctioned by M/s. Sundaram Housing Finance limited. Subsequently, M/s. Sundaram Housing Finance Limited lodged a complaint alleging that Smt. Uma Rani enclosed a false and inflated salary certificate to the application and fraudulently tried to get loan amount for which she is not eligible. The original salary certificate, according to Smt. Uma Rani, was submitted to M/s. Concert Management Group for processing the loan application. M/s. Concert Management Group was an agent for processing loan applications for M/s. Sundaram Housing Finance Limited. The application of Smt. Uma Rani was forwarded through M/s. Concert Management Group i.e., through the petitioner herein. The charge sheet allegations go to show that several witnesses were examined and it is alleged that the salary certificate was fabricated by A1 in collusion with A2 and A3. The petitioner herein is A2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/A2 has referred to certain letters i.e., internal correspondence between the Principal Secretary to the Government and the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, wherein it appears that on behalf of the Concert Management Group a letter dated 26.03.2002 was sent and in the said letter the Concert Management Group admitted that the mistake was occurred at their level by one of their subordinate Mr. Prasad, who tampered the original pay slip to project higher gross/net salary to meet the loan requirements. If that is the case the petitioner may file those letters before the trial Court in his defence and adduce evidence in support of his case. It is for the trial Court to decide the specific role played by the petitioner. When it is specifically alleged that the petitioner in collusion with others fabricated the salary certificate of A1, the same cannot be verified at this level. In view of the same, I am of the view that there are no grounds to quash the proceedings. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. _____________________ B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J. Date: 20.04.2010 Nsr