IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 589 of 2010 (S/S) Virendra Singh S/O Sri Phool Chand Singh. …… Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand through its Principal Secretary Medical Education and Ayush, Uttarakhand, Dehradun, District Dehradun and two others. … Respondents. Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, learned Brief Holder, for the respondents. Date July 27, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 7- 8-2007 (Annexure No.-2 to the petition) passed by District Ayurvedic and Unani Officer Tehri Garhwal, whereby the appointment of the petitioner has been cancelled pursuant to the D.O. letter of the Government dated 12-7-2007. According to the petitioner, he was initially appointed as Class IV employee on part-time basis and subsequently the petitioner was absorbed by an order dated 28-5-2005 of respondent no. 3 in the regular pay-scale as full-time employee. The grievance of the petitioner is the District Ayurvedic and Unani Officer Tehri Garhwal by his order impugned dated 7-8-2007 has cancelled the appointment of the petitioner and the services of the petitioner were terminated with immediate effect without assigning any reason and without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. In the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated 26-11-2009 rendered by this Court in W.P.S.S. No. 1103 of 2008, Sanjay 2 Kumar and others Vs. State and others, which was upheld by a Division Bench judgment of this Court in Special Appeal No. 112 of 2010, State of Uttarakhand and others Vs. Sanjay Kumar and others, decided on 7-7-2010. The learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that this writ petition may be decided in terms of the order dated 26-11-2009 passed by this Court in W.P.S.S. No. 1103 of 2008, Sanjay Kumar and others Vs. State and others which has been confirmed in aforesaid Special Appeal by the Division Bench of this Court. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents- State has fairly conceded that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated 26-11- 2009 passed by this Court in W.P.S.S. No. 1103 of 2008, Sanjay Kumar and others Vs. State and others and that the order of the learned Single Judge has been upheld in the Special Appeal. I have perused the order dated 26-11-2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (S/S) No. 1103 of 2008. Controversy involved in the present writ petition is identical in nature to that of the WPSS No. 1103 of 2008. I have also gone through the order dated 7-7-2010 passed in Special Appeal No. 112 of 2010 thereby the judgment rendered by the learned Single Judge has been upheld. In the above facts and circumstances, this writ petition deserves to be allowed in terms of the order dated 26-11-2009. The writ petition is allowed in terms of order dated 26- 11-2009 passed in W.P.S.S. No. 1103 of 2008, Sanjay Kumar and others Vs. State and others. The impugned order dated 7-8-2007 (Annexure-2 to the petition) passed against the petitioner is quashed. Costs easy. ( B.S.Verma, J. ) RCP 3