IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 27736 of 2008 Between: Madina High School, Rep by Secretary, Mr. K. Arifuddin, S/o. K.M. Quamaruddin, aged 63 years, R/o. 3-6-126, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Commissioner and Director of School Education, Sahibabad, Beside Telephone Bhavan, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2 District Education Officer, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad A.P. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to act according to law, consider the representations of the students of petitioner school by name Mr. Ahmed Fareed, S/o. Anwar Fareed of X Class, Mr. Minzah Jaffer Shaik, S/o. Mr. Shaik Jaffer Shaik of X Class, Mr. Abdul Raheem Khan, S/o. Mr. Assadullah Khan of X Class, Mr. Faizan Khan, S/o. Mohd Abdul Hameed of X Class and Mr. Mohd Abdul Furkhan, S/o. Mohd Abdul Quadeer of X Class, consequently allow them to write 2nd language examination in special English instead to Telugu in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.DAS MOHAPATRA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner is a school. It filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the representations of its students and permit them to write second language examination in Special English instead of Telugu. This Court on 19.12.2008 while issuing notice before admission granted interim directions to the respondents to consider the representations purported to have been made by the petitioners taking into consideration the instructions issued by the Government in Memo dated 10.12.2008 and to pass appropriate orders within one week from the date of receipt of the said order. Today, when the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondents that pursuant to the directions of this court the representation of the students of the petitioner school has been considered and orders were passed, and, therefore, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. In view of the above, the writ petition is closed requiring no further order orders. N.V.RAMANA,J Dt.13.8.2009 msv