IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.1280 of 2011(O&M) Decided on:- 08.07.2011 Vijay Kumar ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajai Lamba Present: Mr. Sudhanshu Makkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh, Asstt.A.G, Haryana. **** Ajai Lamba, J(Oral) This petition is directed against the judgment of conviction recorded by Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Loharu dated 20.1.2010 and order of sentence dated 21.1.2010. The petitioner has been convicted for commission of offence under Sections 294 and 510 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months and fine. The petitioner preferred an appeal that has been dismissed vide the other impugned judgment rendered by Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwani dated 19.5.2011. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner at the point in time when the incident took place was inebriated and therefore, was not in his senses. Under such circumstances, he should be acquitted. I have considered the contention of the learned counsel. Being under the influence of liquor, is not a defence available to a person who commits the offence of annoying the others by doing obscene acts in public place. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has not pointed out from the judgments under challenge that any piece of evidence has not been considered or a piece of evidence has been perversely read. No ground for interference in revisional jurisdiction is made out. Petition is dismissed. 08.07.2011 ( Ajai Lamba) mamta Judge