Crl. Rev. No.3241 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. Crl. Rev. No.3241 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.02.2011 Zamindar Pandit ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana for the State. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). Petitioner was found guilty under Sections 420/467/468/471 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- for each offence under Section 420/467/468/471 IPC. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner does not challenge the conviction of the petitioner and submitted that the petitioner has already remained in custody for about two months during the pendency Crl. Rev. No.3241 of 2010 2 of this case and he has suffered a lot of embarrassment owing to the pendency of this criminal case. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. The present case was registered against the petitioner for offence under Sections 420/467/468/471 of the Indian Penal Code. The sword of Damocles is not to hangover the head of the petitioner for all times to come. He has suffered mental agony due to registration of this criminal case against him. The petitioner has already undergone sentence for about two months in this case. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of this case while maintaining the conviction of the petitioner, the petitioner is sentenced to undergo sentence for the period already undergone by him in this case. With above mentioned modification in the matter of sentence, this revision petition is dismissed. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 15.02.2011 sk. Crl. Rev. No.3241 of 2010 3