CR 25/2008. 23.4.2008. Present: Mr. G.R. Palsara, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Gautam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, counsel for the respondent. This revision has been preferred against the judgment of the executing court ordering the attachment of the property of the judgment debtor for disobedience of the permanent prohibitory injunction granted in favour of the decree holder-respondent Learned counsel for the judgment debtor submits that the learned executing court has acted in excess of its jurisdiction and exercised its jurisdiction with material irregularity in ordering the attachment of his property holding that he was guilty of disobedience of the decree. This contention cannot be accepted as the learned executing court has come to a definite conclusion on the basis of evidence that the judgment debtor has not obeyed the decree. In revisional jurisdiction it would not be open to me to reassess and reappreciate evidence unless any perversity is pointed out. I do not find any legal justification to interfere with the findings of fact arrived at by the learned executing court. This revision is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. CMP No. 100/2008. Dismissed. 23rd April, 2008. (Dev Darshan Sud), (cm) Judge.