Stnflit®Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fS)NO. ]2^<> / 2009 PETITIONERS .^ .^s~ .<y:.. ^ ;WM"«^ y/''""-^ 1) Rajesh Kumar Singh S/o Late Shri Bhagwan Singh, aged about 42 years, Occupation Lab Technician, Guru Ghasidas - University Bilaspur (C.G.) 2) Raj'endra Pandey ^/o Ramesh Kumar, aged about 37 years, Occupation Lab Technician, Guru Ghasidas ' University Bilaspur (C.G.) 3) Sandeep Ram S/o Late Dr. S.P. Ram, Aged about 39 years, Occupation Lab Technician, Guru Ghasidas University BUaspur (C.G.) 4) Balram Singh Kshatri S/o Shri Chandra Shekhar Singh Kshatri, Aged about 43 years, Occupation Lab Technician, Guru Ghasidas University Bilaspur (C.G.) 5) Suresh Chandrakar S/o E.R. Chandrakar, Aged about 33 years, Occupation Lab Technician, Guru Ghasidas / ^' University BUaspur (C.G.) r- K<^hl<^^^ 6) Rajesh Kumar Ke^cor- S/o L.P. Kesh^e,^ Aged about 39 years, Occupatlon Lab Technician, Guru Ghasidas University Bilaspur (C.G.) 7) Sailesh Soni S/o M.K. Soni, Aged about 41 years, Occupation Lab Technician, Guru Ghasidas University Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. ^' 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through The r Secretary Information Technology Departaaaent D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Registrar, Guru Ghasidas University, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. XI-HC—78 .:m^^'f^N-r' . 7t^I •oTI^S?? •'sF^T ^ ?5; Z^? ';:?TFT?7?R, ^Tli-<N4^.;: T^^l^y' ^^^^^^^..^...^ .3TT^T'''^5R:; (^^^T):" .-;...--. - :• • -. • . ^nw:"^7?''5:nt^" SB: • Hon. iVlr. Justice Prtinker Dlwaker 28.07.2009: Shri B.P. Rao, couns^l for the petitioners. Shri Shashank Thak4r, PL for the respondents/State. Gounsei for the petl respondent No. 2 shal! rnait ^i€f{<rt4t;'f4ifrf^if-^T fe^i ';[f^^« '^'^iRww^r |oners submits that the petltioners have aiready made a represent^tlon (Annexure P-5) and the purpose of £M the petitioner wouid be serjved if the said representation is dlrected to be decided at an eariy c|ate. To this, counsel for the respondents has no objection. Accordlngiy, the petitjon is disposed ofwith a direction that the e an effort to decide the aiready pending representatlon of the petiti^ner, in accordance with lav^. Neediess to say that the said represent&tion shall be declded not later than three months from the date of receipt of copy of thls order. At the same tlme the petitioner wouid also be at iiberty to submit a reminder to respondent No. 2 for doing the needful. The respondent No. 2 shali not in any way be infiuenced by thls order and the representation shall be decided by it strictly in accordance with Isw. —- Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge -w^^^^^yyyy.^f. ?s'^s^^!W^^S><S».ff1W^^9^:-: