Page 1 of 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl. M.C. 70/2007 % DATE OF DECISION : 20th AUGUST, 2008 NITIN GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: None. versus STATE & ORS ….Respondents Through: Mr. R.N. Vats, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may No be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? No J U D G M E N T MANMOHAN, J: (ORAL) 1. Despite a pass-over, none is present on behalf of the petitioner. 2. However, I have perused the file and I find that the petitioner has already been granted regular bail by learned Additional Sessions Judge vide its order dated 22nd November, 2006. Consequently, the prayer made by the petitioner for quashing of order dated 17th Page 2 of 2 November, 2006 passed MM, rejecting petitioner’s bail, does not survive. 3. Accordingly the petition is dismissed as infructuous. August 20, 2008 MANMOHAN, J. rb