IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7918 of 2010 1. KAILASH MAHTO, S/o Late Sukhdeo Mahto. 2. Mahendra Mahto, S/o Rajo Mahto. 3. Satya Narayan Mahto, S/o Kailash Mahto. 4. Binod Kumar Mahto, S/o Mahendra Mahto. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Prayag Mahto, S/o Jagdeo Mahto, R/o Village-Adalpur, P.S.-Patori, District-Samastipur. ----------- 02. 30.11.2010 The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 03.02.2010 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Samastipur in S.Tr. No. 341 of 2009/17 of 2010 by which he has refused to discharge the petitioner in which cognizance was taken under Section 307 IPC. The contention of the petitioner is that apart from the statement in the First Information Report there is no additional material. Considering that the said material is enough to put the accused on trial, I see no justification in interfering with the matter. The application is dismissed. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)