IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3158 of 2006 2 19-11-2008 Naresh JAGNARAIN SINGH Son of late Krishnanand Singh, resident of village and post office Powan, police station Masaurhi, District Patna working as Anusevak, Building Division, Saharsa, Public Works Department, Government of Bihar 2. Sikandar Kumar son of Shri Saryug Rai, resident of village Barahi, post office Anandpura, police station Udakishunganj, District Madhepura, working as Choukidar, Building Division, Saharsa, Public Works Department, Government of Bihar 3. Mohd. Israil son of Shri Dillo Mian, resident of wn.1, Bhartiya Nagar, Saharsa, working as Anusevak, Building Division, Saharsa, Public works Department, Government of Bihar. 4. Ram Narain Rai son of late Damodar Rai, resident of village and post office Sanji, police station Phulparar, District Madhubani, working as Choukidar, Building Division, Saharsa, Public Works Department, Government of Bihar. 5. Chhotelal Choudhary son of late Fuhi Choudhary, resident of village and post office Chandrayan Dharhara, P.S. Nauhatta, Dist. Saharsa, working as Khansama Helper, Building Division, Saharsa, Public Works Department, Government of Bihar. 6. Amrendra son of late Ramchandra Lal, resident of village and post office Chhateneshwar, police station Warisnagar, District Samastipur, working as Choukidar, Bui lding Division, Saharsa, Public Works Department, Government of Bihar. ........... Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Shri A.K.Choudhary, Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar,Patna. 3. Shri Arun Kumar Singh, Secretary, Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. Shri Pramod Bihari Asthana, Chief Engineer, Building Cosntruction Department, Noarth Bihar, Patna. 5. Shri Mahesh Choudhary, Superintendent Engineer, Building Circle, Saharsa. 6. Shri Niranjan Kumar Choudhary, District Magistrate, Saharsa 7. Shri Ram Naresh Choudhary, Executive Engineer, Bhavan Pramandal, Saharsa...............Opposite Parties. ------------- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that order of the writ court has been complied with. In that view of the matter the contempt proceeding is finally disposed of. (Shiva Kirti Singh,J) - 2 -