BJGH COURT OF CHEilSGA- WRIT PETITION gS} N0. 2790 of2i)0’7 WRIT PETlTiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CUNSTITUI‘ION OF INDIA Single Bench : Hon’ble Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. Present: Mr. Kunai Das, Advocate for the petitioner. Miss Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the Statefrespondems. i ORDER (I’assed en 7m day 0fMay, 2007) 1. The question of law involved herein is asto Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale W.e.f the date of initial appointment 0r &om the date of completion ofprobation period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as wail as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same as to that of in W.P.(S) No. 4725/2006 (Amar Sai Ram & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others), which was aiiowed vide order dated ()l .09.2006. In View of the above—stated submissions made by learned counsel for the patties, the writ petition is allowed in the same teims. No order as to /rjé&f ‘:~ VJ; costs. Satish K.Agnihotrt s Judge ATTRII AT BILASPUR A i ‘ PETITIONER : about 43 years, working as Assistant Govt. Primary Schoal, Regalia of Rajoti, Tahsil Kunkuri: District (C.G.). VERSUS of Chhattisgarh, through Secretaiy, RESPONDENTS : 1. of Seheol Educatian, D.K.S. Raipur (C.G.). Edueation OEcer, District Jashpur 2. Educatien OEieer, Kunkuri, District 3. (C.G.)