CMPMO No.679 of 2008. 09.04.2009 Present: Mr.R.S. Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1. This petition has been preferred against the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Kangra at Dharamshala in appeal No.6 of 2008 vacating the stay order granted in the appeal preferred by the petitioner herein. The facts urged in the appeal need not be discussed in detail as I find that the order which has been passed vacating the stay is illegal. Merely because the Deputy Commissioner observes that a detailed order has been passed by the statutory authority negating the claim of the petitioner herein and that there is no provision in the Scheme for granting stay, the reasoning in the order canot be sustained. While granting an interim injunction/order, the Authority has to consider all the aspects of the case instead of merely making general observations. In this view of the matter, the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner is quashed and set aside. He shall hear the parties afresh before passing any order. This petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. All miscellaneous applications are disposed of. All interim orders are vacated. April 9, 2009 (Dev Darshan Sud) (aks) Judge.