IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40319 of 2008 RAMJAN @ SHAHBAJ ANSARI ….. PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …… OPP. PARTY For the petitioner : - Sri Arvind Nath Pandey, Advocate For the Informant : - Sri Rajni Kant Pandey, Advocate For the O.P. : - Sri D. Mehta, APP ----------- 2. 21.10.2008 Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner, Sri Rajni Kant Pandey for the informant and Sri D. Mehta, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. On the basis of the rejection order itself, it is contended that it could be a case of virtually no identification in spite of that the informant has identified the petitioner, inasmuch as, there is statement in the case diary, which could indicate that prior to participating in the TIP the informant and his son were suspecting the hand of the present petitioner in the offence. The contention further is that they are known to each other and each go to the same Majid for offering Namaj and in spite of that could not name the petitioner in FIR. Regard being had to the above contention and facts, let petitioner Ramjan @ Shahbaj Ansari be released from custody on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction - 2 - of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Chand P.S. Case No. 29 of 2008. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J)