IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC NO.7672 OF 2002 1. SRIMATI ASHA DEVI KANKARBAGH 2. SHRI R.SHARMA, KANKARBAGH. VERSUS 1.BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, VIDYUT BHAWAN, PATNA& 2. THE SECY BSEB, PATNA 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER PATNA ELECTRIC SUPPLY UNDERTAKING, MANGLES ROAD, PATNA 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KANKARBAGH DIVISION, PATNA 5. THE ASSTT. ELECTRICAL ENGINEER (REV) SUPPLY SUB DIVISION ---------- 9 13.01.2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners have come to this Court for quashing the bills contained in annexure 5, 6 & 8 to the writ petition, issued by respondent no.5. Leaned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that industrial policy of 1993-95 covers cases of both, Low Tension & High Tension (LT & HT) Industrial Service and thus non-exemption of fuel surcharge and minimum guarantee would be violative of industrial policy itself. There is no difficulty in accepting the submission of the petitioners that LT consumer would also be covered under the policy. However, from perusal of annexure- 3 and 3/1, it appears that the petitioners’ Units are not involved in any industrial production. However, if any other dispute regarding raising of bill is concerned, it would be open for them to agitate the same before appropriate authority who would consider the same. The writ petition stands disposed of with aforesaid directions. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J).