HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G.S. SINGHVI AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Appeal No.232 of 2007 Between: M/s. Deccan Electronics Company, R.P Road, Secunderabad – 72, rep. by its partner Sri Gopal Das Agarwal, s/o Radhey Raman Lal … Appellant And Chairman cum Presiding Officer, Hon’ble Addl. Industrial Tribunal cum Addl. Labour Court, M.J.Road, Chandra Vihar Bldgs, Hyderabad and two others … Respondents ::JUDGMENT:: Counsel for the appellant : Shri V. Hari Haran Counsel for respondent No. 2 : Shri M. Pandu Ranga Rao April 23, 2007 Per G.S. Singhvi, C.J. This appeal is directed against order dated 23-11-2006 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPMP Nos.27985 and 9279 of 2006 and WVMP No. 2018 of 2006 in Writ Petition No. 7210 of 2006. After arguing the case for sometime, Shri V. Hari Haran, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appeal has substantially become infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such because, in terms of the order passed by the learned Single Judge, respondent No.2 has already encashed the draft of Rs.45,515/-. He then submitted that the Bench may clarify that the order under challenge shall not be used by respondent No.2 in any other proceedings, which may be instituted by him questioning his retrenchment from service. Shri M. Pandu Ranga Rao, learned counsel for respondent No.2 submitted that he does not have any serious objection. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of as infructuous with an observation that the order under challenge shall not be used by respondent No.2 in any other proceedings. As a sequel to disposal of the appeal, WAMP No. 438 of 2007 filed by the appellant for interim relief is also disposed of as infructuous. G.S. SINGHVI, CJ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J April 23, 2007 ks