IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7843 of 2007 Between: Gunda Gangaiah, S/o. Bheemalingu, Former Nodal Prerak, Gullakota-2 (Village), Velgatoor (Mandal), Karimnagar District, R/o. Kodipunjulapally (Village), H/o. Gullakota. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, & President Akshara Ujwala Samithi, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. 2 The Deputy Director, & Secretary Akshara Ujwala Samithi, Opp: Collector Office, Karimnagar, Karimnagar district. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of Respondents in not considering the Representation given to 1st Respondent on dated 5-2- 2007 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of Art. 14, 21 of the Indian Constitution and Consequently directing the Respondents to make the payments of Arrears of Remueration and all the expenditure incurred by the Petitioner including Corpus fund of Rs. 5,000/- and pass necessary order or or orders as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KOTAGIRISREEDHAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : O R D E R: This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing the action of the respondents in not considering the representation given to the 1st respondent-District Collector and President Akshara Ujwala Samithi, Karimnagar on 5.2.2007. He further seeks a specific direction to 1st respondent and 2nd respondent-Deputy Director and Secretary, Akshara Ujwala Samithi, Karimnagar to pay arrears of remuneration of expenditure incurred by him including corpus fund of Rs.5,000/-. The petitioner is an unemployed youth. He was appointed as Prerak of Grama Niranthara Vidya Kendram of Gullakota village by 1st respondent. He is entitled to a remuneration of Rs.300/- per month for the said service. Honororium has been enhanced from time to time. He participated in several welfare programmes in recognition of his work. He was promoted as a Nodal Prerak from 1.7.2002. The 2nd respondent having utilized his services as a Nodal Prerak did not make any payment for one reason or the other. Therefore, he submitted a representation claiming remuneration for 31 months as Prerak and 43 months as Nodal Prerak amounting to Rs.65,800/-, newspaper bill due Rs.28,650/- and traveling allowance of Rs.13,800/-. It is stated in the counter affidavit of respondents that the representation of the petitioner has been disposed of and copy of the proceeding issued by 1st respondent has been placed on record. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the material placed on record. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the 1st respondent issued proceeding without considering the claims made by him. I have gone through the proceeding of 1st respondent dated 12.7.2007 whereunder his representation dated 5.2.2007 has been disposed of. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the proceeding of the 1st respondent dated 12.7.2007, he is always at liberty to challenge the same in accordance with the provisions of law. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. 21st July, 2008. (B.Seshasayana Reddy,J) tnb ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SPJS} THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.7843 of 07 21st July 2008.