c^ -^r' 11-. THE HIGH C01.IB3',OF JUDICAIUBS Jil. BILA-3FaB__(CHH^TI3S^ri tSa'@ITIONJio.._ [^/srO?_2pQi r/ PSa'ITIONBK; Sakhdeo Ram Koreti, son of G.B.Kore'ti, aged about li-9 years, occupation: Joint Director, Publlc Relation Directorate, Baipur (C.G). Vs. BSSPONDBHTS : ^ 1^'^- Sta.te of Gflhattisgarh: Tnrouga: ^••y\^ Gaief Secretary, D.K.Bhawan,Baipur. ^••\^ e^^l;p" w^ j^^y . --'^^>y'- ^\^"'.x^ .^•^tt8 <-'^"./' '^'"" ^° i^v\ /- .'/S\'Q r ^w^ \r' r:'' 2. Principal Secretary, Public Belation Departaent, D.K.Baawan,Ba-ipur. 3. Director, Public Eelatioa Department, In front of'Mahila P.3., Raipur (C.6) 4. Umes'n Gnandra Drri.vedi, Additional Director, Public Eelation Department, Directorate, in fron'fc of Mahila P.S. Raipur (G.G). ?. Subhash .Mis'ara, Additional Director, Public Rela-tion Departaeat ,IH.rectorate, in front of Mahila'P.S. Raipur (C.G) WRIT_PETITION UNDgB ARTICLE 226/22f OF THE_GOI?fflITUTIOT !«BS^. OF INDIA Xi-HC-22 Sil^T^iT 1^;riq?3B^I %*iicti ^Tft^ ^^t-^-^xf. ggg' .:i-^-:-<s'; 7£[•^l^ld'1!, isnlly'ie, 'f^cTRiy W.P.N0.164/2004 SD^I'?RITWFFI5?I ^rdlT^iT1 TFN^ff ^ fs''^l ^•("$t< ^! 3lf:<Pl SB^I Shri Shailesh Ahuja.l Shr-i. Sanjay K. the State. By thls writ petlticjn order dated l4th October the Principal Secfetary, The mal.tt grlevance i proinoted even though the^ Tritoe. Being the sena.or' to the rani< o£ Add.i.tionalj with! iaeen considered andLthe J Learned counsel for has already made a repre^ bas not been decided by the respondent No. 1 may representat.i.on (Annexure to whlch learned Dy. but bs subcnits that tbe counsel for the petitioner. Dy. Advocate General for under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, tt\e petitioner has cha-llenged ths |2003(Annexure P-1) passed by loovernment of Chhattisgarh. the petitioner I.s that the junior persons i.e» respc|ndents NO. 4 & 5 have been belong to the general category ^elongs to a category of Scheduls tmost, he deserves the promotlon Director, but his caee has not wJ.th|out considering h-i.s case [un.i.or. persons have been promoted tthe |the petitioner submits that be lentationtAnnexure P-3) which respondent No. l. Therefore, Ibe directed to decj.de the •3) already made by the petitionei General has-ho objectl.on. l|>ronotions have already been Advcicate XI-HC-22 sn^t^ iwsn^r ^rHwa^r ^i^ss^ ^ 'S^ -^WM^, WSP^fS, feTOy made aad tbe respondentsj pronaoted as Additj.onal Havlng heard learnefa hava.ng regard to the fac) case, . respondent NO. representatlon(Annexure by the petltXoner within With the above diretit.Lon No, 4 &5 have already been Dllrector • counsel for the parties, .s and circuastances of the 1 is d-i.rected to decide the |>~1) of the petltloner, whJ.ch on 23.10.2003 and pass an all the points raised a period o£ 30 days. , the petition stands ^lllcliK-f'Efp-RS^felSt' ^T ai'figii sn^t vj-ew of tbe abov^ order, I.A.No.413/2004 stands of« CertAfied copy as p^r rules. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge ['Tr^^reR