,.^^^,^w^^s>cV'a'^f'r^-^^'ll'vw"^ ,FEE, ?-*^^-^-L-^'WV c ^ pp' Is' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUEIICATURE AT BItASPUR (C»G.). WRIT yCTfTION NO.2-'^5'^? 2001 SETITIONER Mela Rara, son o£ Shri Pane* Ram, iN \ aged aboyfe •5"^ years, sarpanch, .••^ ' •;'t..<?l.-"*"Tr Gra"' Panehaya t Gogaon Bloek ^-•^<2''.'£•"' ,/<'.y>.:.P'Y\ •' Dharsiva, Di?t. Raipur (C.G.). l^^\ ^^^ ..^ VERSUS .A^ '&^RESPONDENTS : t ^li/ltie State 6f chha-ttlsgarh, Through s colleetor Raipur. L) The sub Oivisional Offieer (Bavenue) aalpur (c.G.). 3) Ediaram Das, son of Late Pyarelal satnanl, aged about -i.t, years, resident of vlllage - Gogaon, Palice statlon — iChamtarai, Blstt.^'Raipur (G<B) WRIT PETITION UNBER ARTIGLES 226/227 OFTHE GONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1. XI-HC-22 Tsg '<41<(W'll,»fll*('l6, l°«'ll*f1< 1^1 € 3(I$?I"^ R-ii.eb 3n^[ St»*flctl^lf^t: '^ -° ^ *II*ICTI ai*)ich sn^r TI^^ I.»«Ba.l4?2/2001 ••-——-----•-^ 200 15.04.2002 Shri P.P. Sahu, connse|l for the petitioner, Shri Sanjay K. Agraw^l, Deputy Advocate Qeneral for respondents No. 1 and 2. Shri D. Prajapall, No.3/coinplainant. By this writ petiUon, Order dated 06.8.2001 pa^ed Itlle petitloner is challeriging the y . by the Additipnal Collector, Raipur, whereBy the applic^tion for staying the impugned order passed by respQndent 'Ehfi ;petitloiier was e in the distnct of;Raipur. It ^' fhe Gram Pancllayat, i'esp4 of petitioner by filing an Panchayat EaJ Adluniyaoi t^ Divisional Ofiicer who is tht Act. Petitioner gubniits that •st)l'fti?i<ftri ^R^*^ 'f^zf <Ri^i< ^aiiPgHsn^i counsel for respondent ^|no.2, 'has been rejectecL ^ted^; as a Sarpanch fFsm the reserved seat of Sclieduled C|aste i.e. Gram. PanchayatGogaon subinitted fhat after eleetlon to nderiit no.3 chaUenged fhe casfe appliEaticaiu/s 139/40 o;T the sfore Respondent No.2/the sub- prescribed authority under the the School CertiQcate issued ty ['<ft^$I<a*l !.i1 XI-HC-22 sn^i^n R-fi.th sn^? ?t)+ii^> •yfsa^ ~\ .--> -.-' •-^i_ ^: "fi''' 's^ '^iPTRra, '^atwis, fafii'yy tiilCTi aiiit*i STr^T 1CR^ ra-fe^l-^^^--'^ 200 [ i-2 ^ 3IR5I'i^IRre ^rfW -Z-- the Head Master demons|trates that he belortgs tp the Butj by order dated_ 12.07.2001 ;d the petitioner froni the post of Certificate. Agam.st fhisorder, ^efore the CoUector u/s 91 ofthe of M.P. Panehayat (Appeal and Schelduled Gaste. respondent no.2 has remov^ Sarpanch ignoring the Scho|3l petitioner preferred appeal said Act read with Rule 31 Revlsion) Riiles 1995 an( rejectmg the application petitibileT, fixed( the casji nierits. Bemg aggFieyed by ^.uthority, petitioner has before this Coiut. the case and uiaterial on rel ends of justice would serv) CoUector to decide fhe matt cbt^<rpii'i *iM<if'^ fa*<il <S<n^i< ^TsipgiTsn^i i.the appellate auftlonty whUe for interim stay fited t?y -Ahe ? ' ' '• . ":.-. .''-:"; .••^.."^";... •'.""•' ior 14.8.2001 fer lieBrinK on pie order;passed by the^appeUiate ipled this petition on 16.8.2001 By ord.er dated 20-8-2(^01, this Coiirt hasgranted stay. Having fhus considerejd the facts and circumstances of ord, in the opinion of fhis Court ; tf a dtrection is given to fhe ;r on incrits tn accordance with law, as early as possible pre|ferably wittun 3 months from the [^^a^ v^: ss XI-HC-22 •^ ^a3?IS l<;-fi«t) OT^?! ^t^iw -^f%d; m '5^'<<l*IM<i,aixl'lu'i<»,(«t<'ll<-l11i in<i?tTci)<ii<*i sn^r '<raq? v>.:.&....!.t^:^.. •M 200l 311^1 WIRR ^lfOT of final argum.ents. TMs petition is Uispo! 'tillii'141'1 Kllirif 4 ft^ <FII«;K i? siPwisii^i . date pf receipt/production|of a copy of thls order. TUl flnal decision of the appellate au|Uiority, fhe impugned ordersshaU reniain in abeyance. Parties shall render f[|ieir cooperation during fhe course ed of with the du-ection aforesaid. Certified Photocopy b^^upplie^..^.^-- --->•--.----- r sa/- 1 Fakhruddin - Judge