IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7224 of 2006 MD.MAHFOOZ ALAM, SON OF LATE MD. SERAJUDDIN, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA SALAMAT NAGAR, P.S. KATIHAR, DISTRICT KATIHAR. Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE SUNNI WAQF BOARD, 34, HARDINGE ROAD, PATNA THROUGH THE SECRETARY. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE SUNNI WAQF BOARD, 34, HARDINGE ROAD, PATNA. 3. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE SUNNI WAQF BOARD, 34, HARDINGE ROAD, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT WAQF COMMITTEE, FAKIR TAKIA, P.O., P.S. AND DISTRICT KATIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY. 5. THE SECRETARY, THE DISTRICT WAQF COMMITTEE, FAKIR TAKIA, P.O.,P.S. AND DISTRICT KATIHAR. 6. THE WAQF COMMITTEE OF ANJUMAN ISLAMIA, WAQF ESTATE NO.344, MANGAL BAZAR, P.O., P.S. AND DISTRICT KATIHAR, THROUGH THE SECRETARY. 7. THE CHAIRMAN, THE WAQF COMMITTEE OF ANJUMAN ISLAMIA, WAQF ESTATE NO.344, MANGAL BAZAR, P.O., P.S. AND DISTRICT KATIHAR. 8. THE SECRETARY, THE WAQF COMMITTEE OF ANJUMAN ISLAMIA, WAQF ESTATE NO.344, MANGAL BAZAR, P.O., P.S. AND DISTRICT KATIHAR. For the petitioner : Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, Advocate. For respondent nos.1 to 3 : Mr. Ram Kishore Singh, Advocate. For respondent no.8 : Mr. Khatim Reza, Advocate. ----------- 05. 15.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sunni Wakf Board and the Secretary, Wakf Committee of Anjuman Islamia, Katihar, respondent no.8. 2. Petitioner is the tenant of Wakf Committee of Anjuman Islamia, Katihar bearing Estate No.344. The shop which was under occupation of the petitioner required renovation. For renovation of the said shop petitioner was asked to occupy another shop of the wakf 2 estate. In spite of renovation of the shop of the petitioner he has not shifted back to his shop. 3. Having heard counsel for the parties, it is directed that petitioner should occupy the earlier shop by tomorrow(16.4.2011) and complete the shifting by 29.4.2011. In the event, petitioner does not vacate the other shop which is in his occupation today he be evicted therefrom by force on 30.4.2011. For any other relief petitioner may approach the civil court of competent jurisdiction. 4. With the direction aforesaid, the writ application is disposed of. Rajesh/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)