IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20836 of 2009 MUNMUN SINGH Versus THE STTAE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 25.08.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 341, 323, 448, 379, 504, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation as per F.I.R. is that a group of accused persons including the petitioner trooped into the house of the informant. Petitioner Munmun Singh and co-accused Prince Kumar are said to have assaulted the informant by means of iron rod, causing injury. Learned counsel refers to and relies upon the averments made in paragraphs 11 and 12 of the bail application in order to demonstrate that there are sharp litigations between the parties. Referring to Annexure-2 (injury report), it has been contended that except injury no.1 rest of the injuries were found to be simple in nature. Learned counsel submits that even injury no.1, prima facie indicates that the same is simple. It is contended with reference to the materials appearing at para-33 of the case diary, that in his re-statement the informant has stated that it was 2 co-accused Prince Kumar who assaulted him by means of iron rod. Petitioner is in custody since 1.4.2009. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 37 of 2009. P.K. ( K.K. Mandal, J.)