WP(C) 4849/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Goswami, le arned standing counsel, Finance Department for the respondents. The petitioner has filed the present petition praying for restraining/prohibitin g the respondent authorities from collecting/realizing any amount or money from the petitioner as advance/additional security to facilitate movement of his vehi cles for transportation of raw jute beyond the territorial limits of Assam save and except as provided under Section 7(2A) (3A) (3B) of the Central Sales Tax Ac t. The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the re spondent authorities have submitted that the matter in issue has already been an swered by this Court vide judgment and order dated 3.7.2009 passed in WP(C) 1080 /2009 (M/s Piya Trading Company vs. State of Assam and ors.) and accordingly the present writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the directions contained i n Para 18 of the said judgment and order which is quoted below:- Considering, therefore, the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justi ce, while the respondents are hereby directed not to demand ’additional security ’ from the petitioners without service of notices, as required, the petitioners’ prayer for direction to the respondents to ’adjust’ the amounts, which are clai med to have been lying deposited with the respondents, is not allowed. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the d irection contained in the aforesaid judgment and order passed in WP(C) No. 1080/ 2009, more particularly as contained in para 18 thereof. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.