{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5262 OF 2009 Baneshwar Shikshan Sanstha Burhannagar Tq-Nagar Dist-Ahmednagar Through its Registrar, Sudhakar Laxman Dhumane R/o Burhannagar, Dist-Ahmednagar PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, Higher Education, Mantrayala, Mumbai 2. The Vice Chancellor, Pune University, Pune 3. The Director of Higher Education Central Building, Pune RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.A.S.Baya, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.V.H.Dighe, AGP for respondents No.1 and 3 ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, and A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 31st August 2009 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER A.V.POTDAR, J.) : {2} 1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2. Heard leaned counsel for the parties. 3. Copies of judgments passed by the Division Bench of this Court at its principal seat at Bombay in Writ Petition No. 5884/2009 so also copy of judgment of the Division Bench of this Court passed in Writ Petition No.5033/2009, to which both of us are parties, are placed on record. Learned counsel for the parties agree that the nature of challenge raised in the present petition and the nature of challenge in writ petition No.5884/2009 decided by the Division Bench of this Court at its Principal seat as well as Writ petition No.5033/2009 decided by this Division Bench are identical. 4. In the light of the said judgments, this petition is allowed and rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause “B” of the writ petition with no order as t costs. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/wp5262-09