IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Criminal Misc. No. M-9332 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision:23.04.2008 Nazia Parveen and another .....Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. S.S.Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Mohd. Salim, Advocate for respondents No.6 and 7. **** RAJESH BINDAL J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners had married against the wishes of parents of petitioner No.1. Notice of the petition was issued. Counsel for respondent No.6 and 7, who are parents of petitioner No.1 submits that they do not have any objection to the marriage of the petitioners. In view of the statement, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. April 23, 2008 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) renu JUDGE