1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No.119, 121, 188, 189 of 1997 and Writ Petition Nos.5573, 5574 and 5575 of 1996 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Shri S.S.Bora, Adv. for petitioners. 1. This is a group of Writ Petitions filed by Municipal Council, Parbhani. Common Order dated 22.2.2006, the original of which is in Writ Petition No.5573 of 1996 indicates that learned counsel for municipal council had stated that the services of the Respondents had already been regularized rendering the writ petitions infructuous. 2 2. Today, Advocate Shri Bora for petitioner-municipal council states that while passing the orders of regularizations, undertakings were given by the respondents that they would not claim back wages. Advocate Shri Bora places on record the copies of undertakings in each of these writ petitions which are taken on record and marked X for identification. 3. In view of settlement between the parties out side the court, these writ petitions are disposed of as infructuous. Date:24/07/2009 (P.R.BORKAR, J.) pnd/wp119.97