1409apeal496.10.odt 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 496 OF 2010 AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 627 OF 2010 IN CRI. APPEAL NO. 496 OF 2010. (Shuddhodhan Gorakkhnath Raut Vs. State of Maharashtra) ............................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ............................................................................................................................................................... Mr. Yogesh Mandpe, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. J. B. Jaiswal, A.P.P. for respondent-State. CORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED : 14 th September, 2010. Heard. Admit. Call R. & P. CRI. APPLICATION NO. 627/10 : Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant and the learned A. P. P. for the respondent-State. By this application, the applicant/appellant prayed for suspension of substantive sentence of imprisonment which was awarded for the period of five years and to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/-, in default, to suffer S. I. for one year, as imposed in Sessions Trial No. 38 of 2009, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal for the offence punishable under Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code by the 1409apeal496.10.odt 2/2 impugned judgment and order dated 23/7/2010. According to the learned Advocate for the applicant, if the substantive sentence of imprisonment is not suspended, the appeal itself become infructuous as it would require long time for hearing and disposal. Taking into consideration the fact that it would take long time to hear the appeal on merits, I am inclined to suspend the substantive sentence of imprisonment, as prayed for. Substantive sentence imposed on the appellant is suspended pending hearing and disposal of the appeal, provided that amount of fine shall be deposited in the trial Court. Since the applicant/appellant was on bail in the trial Court, he be released on bail on the same terms and conditions as were in the trial Court, but with fresh bonds subject to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The application is disposed of. JUDGE wwl