IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 29TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 538 of 2011(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- NJANASEELAN, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O. THOMAS, POIKKARAM VEEDU, KORUTHODU P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 513. BY ADV. SRI.SANIL KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. PIN 686 001. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KANJIRAPPALLI POLICE STATION, KANJIRAPPALLI. KOTTAYAM DIST. PIN 686 507. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANJIRAPPALLI POLICE STATION, KANJIRAPPALLI. KOTTAYAM DIST. PIN 686 507. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHAVAKKADU POLICE STATION, CHAVAKKADU. THRISSR DIST. PIN 680 506. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUNDAKKAYAM POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. PIN 686 513. 6. SAIDU MUHAMMED, S/O. MUHAMMED, VALIYATHODI, KUNDALIYUR P.O., VADANAPPILLI, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 616. R1 TO R5 BY ADDL. DGP SRI.TOM JOSE PADINJAREKARA. R6 BY ADV. SRI.ASHIK K.MOHAMMED ALI THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN WPCR.538/11 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHAVAKKADU DATED 8.11.11. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE MUNDAKKAYAM DATED 10.11.11. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AT KANJIRAPPILLY DATED 12.11.11. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KANJIRAPPILLY DATED 14.11.11. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KOTTAYAM DATED 16.11.11. /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ---------------------------------------- W.P(Crl.).No.538 OF 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. The petitioner says that his daughter is under the illegal detention of the 6th respondent. We interacted with the alleged detenue who is present before us. She works as a housemaid in Kuwait. The 6th respondent is stated to be working as a driver in the neighbouring household in Kuwait. The alleged detenue tells us that she was a Christian and got converted to Islam and has now married the 6th respondent who has another wife. The first wife of the 6th respondent is also present before court along with the 6th respondent and the alleged detenue. With all this, we do not find any room to hold that the alleged detenue is under illegal detention. We interacted and found that she is well oriented. She says that she has no problem in communicating with her parents and that it is for them not to avoid her. It is WPCR.538/11 2 also stated that her conversion from Christianity to Muslim is on her own will. With all this, we think that no orders are call for in this case. The writ petition is hence closed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN Judge Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge kkb.29/11.