IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39475 of 2009 1.AJAY KUMAR SINGH @ CHHABILA SINGH son of late Upendra Singh R/o village Kundal, P.S. Singhihiya, Dist. Samastipur. 2.Indradeo Singh son of late Umakant Singh R/O village Madhepur, P.S. Singhiya, Dist. Samastipur. 3.Mukesh Singh @ Mukesh Kumar Singh son of Baidhyanath Singh, R/O village Harpur P.S. Sonbqarsa Kachahari, Dist. Saharsa …….Petitiners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 19.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case instituted under sections 25(1- B)A, 26, 35 of Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that the Government rifle was claimed by petitioner no.1 who happens to be Home Guard and since there was marriage in the house of the petitioner no.2 the same had been brought for the custom of firing in the air ,let the above named petitioners who are accused in only one connected present case be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M, Rosera( Samastipur) in Singhiya P.S. case No. 48/09, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and further that the bail shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and further that the petitioners will given an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do - 2 - so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (Anjana Prakash, J) M.Rahman