IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH AUGUST 2008 / 5TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 23257 of 2008(R) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ E.C.PRAMOD , VAZHAPOTHIL HOUSE VAZHAYUR EAST, MALAPPURAM DIST BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MALAPPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORIY MALAPPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.V.MANOJ KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.23257/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON THE ROUTE RAMANATTUKARA MAVUR- EDAVANNAPARA DT. 2.4.2007. EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE IST RESPONDENT DT. 7.8.07. EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ALONG WITH THE APPLICATION BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS DT. 2.4.2007. /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) 23257 of 2008 -------------------------------------------------------- Dated: AUGUST 27, 2008 JUDGMENT Delay in considering the application of the petitioner for grant of regular permit is what is complained of in this writ petition. 2. The learned Government Pleader submits that the application will be considered in the next meeting of the RTA, and that submission recorded. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner invites my attention to Exts.P2 whereby the application was adjourned for obtaining prior concurrence. Counsel points out that the matter is covered by the general concurrence issued by the RTA, Kozhikode and therefore there is no reason to await for separate concurrence as mentioned in Ext.P2. It is a matter for the RTA to consider as and when Ext.P1 is taken up for consideration. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-