IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.19399 of 2009 Date of decision: 16th December, 2009 Ram Pal Singh … Petitioner Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Johan Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel submits that at present, he will be satisfied in case legal notice (Annexure P-4) is treated as representation and a speaking order is passed thereupon within a specified time. After hearing counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the view that the prayer made by learned counsel can be accepted. Therefore, legal notice (Annexure P-4) be treated as representation and taking into consideration the order (Annexure P-2) dated 11th November, 2002 passed in CWP No.16497 of 2001 titled ‘Gain Inder Sharma v. Haryana Urban Development Authority and the order (Annexure P-3) dated 8th May, 2007 passed in CWP No.3737 of 2007 titled ‘Mohan and others v. Haryana Urban Development Authority and another’, the Chief Administrator, HUDA shall taken a conscious decision by passing a well reasoned order within three months after receipt of certified copy of this order. Civil Writ Petition No. 19399 of 2009 With the observations made above, present writ petition is disposed of. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE December 16, 2009 rps 2