Mpt WP No.9550/10 FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.9550 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.R.S.Dave i/b M/s.N.N. Vaishnawa & Co. for the petitioners Mr.R.M.Haridas for respondent nos.1 and 4. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATE : 18th January 2011 P.C. : 1. Writ Petition is directed against an interlocutory order and calls for no interference in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2. Even otherwise on merits, I am satisfied that no case is made out for interference. The petitioners are defendant no.4 and 4A in the suit. A suit summons was served on the defendant nos.1A and 1B under Order 5 Rule 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the court accepted the service as a valid service. Thereafter, the present petitioners (defendant no.4 and 4A) made an application that court should reconsider the order accepting the service and direct issuance of a fresh summons. This application is in the nature of a review of the initial order accepting the service. No grounds for review were made out. Even otherwise, defendant nos. 4 and 4A would not be affected by reason of a service of summons under Order 5 Rule 20 on the defendant nos.1A and 1B. There is no merit in the writ petition which is rejected summarily. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)