IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16216 of 2009 MUKESH RAI Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 15.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is husband of the complainant alleged for demand of dowry and causing of cruelty due to its non-fulfillment giving vivid description of the torture, but submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that complainant herself is not ready to reside with the petitioner. For some gain and putting pressure, this complaint case is filed one year after filing a case for restitution under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Complaint Case No. C-298 of 2008, Trial No. 1836 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate (West), Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)