HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE CHHAniSGARH : BILASPUR SiNGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ. Writ Petition No. 3570 OF 2006 PETITIONER Vs. RESPONDENTS 1. 2. Tejbhan Kripteni, S/o. Late Shri Jiyomal Kriplani, Aged about 64 years, R/o. Kavita Nagar, Raipur, tah. & Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Regional Transport Authority Raipur (C.G.) Narendra Pal Singh, S/o. Shri Darshan Singh, aged about 40 years, R/o. Maulipara, Ravigram, Telibandha, Raipur (C.G.) Present: Shri Santosh Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh, learned G.A. for respondent No.1. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 10tn August, 2006) The order of the Regionat Transport Authority, Raipur, the first respondent herein, dated 07,04.2006 granting regular permit to the second respondent on the route Durg to Raipur has been assailed in fhis writ petition. The grievance of the petitioner is that on 21.10.2005 he also made an application to the first respondent for grani of regular permit on the same route and, therefore, the first respondent ought to ( have clubbed his application with that of fce second respondent and passed appropriate order after considering relath/e merits of the petitioner and the second respondent. It is disctosed in the writ petition that the second respondent made an application on 05.09.2005, that is to say, well before the petitioner made apptication on 21.12.2005. Moreover, in the writ petition, nowhere it is stated that e petitioner also sought grant of regular permiton the route Durg to Raipur with the same timings as assigned to the second resgondent. Jnjhat view of the -2-- •^ matter, it cannot be said that the petitioner is an aggrieved person. Writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. No costs. _ Sd/- ChiefJustice Bilaspur Dated : 01.08.2006 \\^ ^%. ^^^^---•"b ^^y^- ^•^-,....••••••" tf Wl v^ L_