^ HjGHCOURTQFCHHAn^^^ APPUCAN:!:S (PETIT!ONERS) NON-APPLICANTS (RESPONDENTS) M.C,C,No,43of2QQ9 : 1. M/s. Vimal Constructions, a partnerahip firm duly registered under the reievant provissons of the Partnership Act, 1932, and carries on the business of Engineers and Corrtractors at Ravi Bhawan, Jai Stambh Chowk, Raipur 492001 2. Kanniai Chand Jain, son of Late NJanikSal Jain, aged about 40 years, Partner M/s, Vima! Constructions, resldent of 21, South Avenue, Choubey Colony, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. The MunicipaJ Corporation, Raipur, a body corporate having common seal and perpetual succession having being constituted under section 7 of the Municipal Corporatlon Act, 1956 and having its Pnncipai office at Malviya Path, Raipur (CG) through the Commsssioner, Raipur, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.) 2, The Commissioner, Munidpaj Corporation, Ralpur. 3. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Principal Secretary to the Govt of Chhattisgarh, Department of Public Works, Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, G.E. Road, Raipur 4» Secretary to the Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Town AdminJstration and Deveiopment (Nagariya Prashasan Evam Vikas) Mantralaya, RaspuL 5. The Divlsional Commlssioner, Raipur Division, Raipur 'nM APPUCATJON FOR RESTORATOIN OF THE PETJTION [ v SBiHon'bSeSMSatishJ<^®|hotn,^ Shri B.P.Sharma, Advocate with Shri Kshltij Sharma, Advocate for the appiicants. Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate forthe respondent No. 1 and 2. Shri Amrito Das, Panej Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 3 to 5. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 15th day of Juiy, 2009) Heardoni.A. No. 1. This is an application tor condonation of deiay. Sufficient cause has been shown. The appiication is ordered as prayed tbr. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the appiicants submits that the counsei for the applicant coutd not appear on account of bonafide mistake, therefore, W.P, No. 836/2002, which was dismissed on 21.10.2008, may be restored to its tile. 2. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown, W.P. No. 836/2002 is restored to the original file, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1000/- by the appiicants to the High Court Legal Aid Committee. 3. A copy of this order be piaced on record of the original writ petition and the same be iisted tbr hearing. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge