IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23042 of 2010 SHASHI SHEKHAR SINGH S/O AKHILESHWARI PD. SINGH, R/O MALAYPUR, P.S.- BARHAT, DISTRICT- JAMUI ………….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SHIV KUMAR SINGH S/O LATE DINESH SINGH 3. SANJAY SINGH S/O LATE DINESH SINGH 4. SHAMBHU SINGH S/O LATE DINESH SINGH 5. RAMESH SINGH S/O LATE KAMALESHWARI SINGH 6. SHAKTI SINGH S/O SHIV KUMAR SINGH ALL R/O VILLAGE MALAYPUR DOMAR TOLA, P.S.- BARHAT MALAYPUR DISTRICT- JAMUI …………..Opposite Parties ----------- 2. 11.03.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 15.4.2010 passed in Barhat Mallay P.S. Case No. 73 of 2007 by which the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jamui while accepting the final report has also taken cognizance under Section 182, 211 Cr.P.C. against the petitioner who is the informant. It has been submitted that just because the case could not be found true during investigation it did not necessarily mean that the case was false and this order was unfortunate even while the protest petition was pending for the same reason. Considering the same, the application is allowed and the order dated 15.4.2010 in Barhat Mallay P.S. Case No. 73 of 2007 passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jamui, is set aside. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)