IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 24th day of December, 2009 Ist Bail Application No.1111 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Rijwan @ Boby .…. Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of FIR No. 151 of 2009, U/s 395, 397 & 412 I.P.C PS Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar. _______________________________________________________________ December 24, 2009 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Smt. Pushpa Joshi, Advocate for the accused applicant. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. with Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State. Heard. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant argued that the applicant has not been named in the FIR. She further submitted that alleged recovery of money has been shown to be made from the house of the co-accused on the pointing out of the accused applicant and the co-accused Sharif. She has further submitted that co-accused Sharif from whose house the money has been shown to be recovered has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 22.10.2009. She has further submitted that another co-accused Sharif Ahmad and Chhidda have also been granted bail by the Sessions Court vide order dated 11.11.2009 & 20.10.2009 respectively and the present accused applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of the parity. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record and in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the accused applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Rijwan @ Boby be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is disposed of accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 24.12.2009 PRABODH 2