IN THgHIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH‘AT BILASPUR (C.G .) WRIT PETITION (C) No. 221 7 OF 2007 PETITIONER ' pm¥wwwr& Kanchan Puri Son of Shri Deosharan Puri, aged about 80 years, Caste Gosai, Resident of Village Nareshpur, Tahsil ‘Surajur, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS ' Ratan Son of Shri Sohag, aged £QLMrn¢$ about 45 years, Caste Gond , Resident 'of Village Nareshpur, Tahsil $urajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). Baliram Son Shri Sohag, aged about 4O ’years, Caste Gond, 'Residen't- of Viliage Mahgawa, Tahsii' Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). Singh Son of Shri aged about 48 years, Caste Gond, Resident of Viliage Nareshpur, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). Mohan Ramnarayan, of Shri Ramnarayan, aged about 43 years, Caste Sond, Resident of vmage Nareshpur, Tahsil' Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). Rambharosh " Son @ Bhagwan .Das Son of Shri Ramnarayan, aged about 41 years, Caste Gond, Resident of Tahsil Village i Nareshpur, Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). Munni *D/o Shri Ramnarayan, aged about 36 years, Caste Gond, Resident of Village Naktapara, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.). Gedibai Widow of Late Shri Ramnarayan, aged about 70 years, Caste Gond, Resident of Tahsil Village Nareshpur, Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). SuE;i Sai So"n of Shri Dheer sai, aged about 60 years, Caste Gond, -Residentof. Village Navapara, Tahsil Manendragarh, District Koriya (C.G.). State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Collector, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 10. * W , K”. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION 'OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As per the cause title. w Board of “Revenue, Bilaspur (C.G.)-, Through: Its Member. 7 WW’WW mmfaw ammm Wyer for the Stat Shri PK Bhaduri, Panel L The insfant petition is 11.09.2006 (Annemre P/l), Revision Case No. RN/lé whereunder Ithe Ismy applicat dismissed. Aiier hearing the coun$e ' appearing for the parties and met perusing the record, I am of the onsidered opinion that the Board o Revenue has nOt committed a d illegality or irregularity so as to invoke extra ordinary jurisdi'cti n of this court under Article V227 of the Constitution bflndia. It is vvell settled principl of law that this Court, in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction und Article 227 of the Constitution of India, should refrain itself horn interfering with the order passed by I the Court below, except in su h cases where perverSity, illegality,” irregularity or jurisdictional 'e or is writ large on the face of the record, which is not in the pres Agarwal S.B. Hon’ble Shri Justice N.K. 21.08.2009 directed against the order dated passed by Board of Revenuein ‘fR/A-23/673/2006, whereby n Shri Ashok Kumar Shukll Advocate for the petitioner. and preferred by the petitioner was t case. e. i f Q)?“ mm “200 Q— mmqariaiaa) ' WWW mw§w ammm W Q mm. \ mzoo mm (Wu) WWW WWW Wm WW ka‘f‘anm mmm Sal However, as the matter is pending since 200’? before this Court, therefare, it is directed Ithat the Revenue Board shall’decide the matter as early as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction, this petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. . Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge