SPONDENTS {PLAINTlFm HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition 1C) N0. 522112011 Kalyan Singh Kurre S/o Deo Prasad Kama, aged about 58 years, R/ o Village Mungeli, Tahsil Mungeli, District Bilaspur (C.»G.). Jeevan Lal Banjare S/o Hal-i PraSad Samami, agCd about years, R/o Village Daupara Mungeli, Distn'ct Bilaspur (C.G.). The State of Chhat‘tisgarh through Collecter Bilaspur (C.G.}. IT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF: IA. VERSUS 1) 2} (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.?.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri Kalyan Singh Kurre with Shri GP. Kurre, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri Akhil Agrawal, PL. for the State/respondent No. 2. Respondent No. 1 not noticed 07/09/2011) (Passed on 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India legality and propn'ety of the order petitioner has challenged the dated 11/7/2011 paseed by Civil Judge Class-2, Mungeli District BilaSpur (C.G.) in civil eXecution case No. 6A] 09 whereby Court below has rejected the application filed on behalf of non execution of the decree on the ground of improper identification. Execution application is very specific is no ambiguity there is no contra report of Executing Officer, in absence of such facts it cannot be presumed decree is not executable. Consequently, by dismissing application Court below has not committed any illegality requin'ng any interference in exercise of supervisory writ jurisdiction. Consequently, petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. However, if any diniculty in execution is reported by the Serving Officer then petitioner may revive his application for proper adjudication before the trial Court. No order as to costs. . Sd/_ T.P. Sharma / 1 judge f/ TITIONER (NON—APPLICANT No. l) ORDER Interim application is also dismissed. 47 RE WR IND PE