HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.968 of 2010 Date: July 1, 2010 Between: Mohammed Yousuf, S/o.Pasha Miya, Aged about 36 years, Occ: Auto driver, R/o.H.No.13-14/6/D, Nehrunagar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District … Petitioner And The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District, and eight others … Respondents Order: The petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents-Police in interfering with the civil disputes between him and respondents 3 to 9 as illegal and arbitrary and also directions not to harass him by calling him to the Police Station. When the matter is taken up, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 placed before this court a copy of letter dated 04-02-2010 addressed by the Station House Officer, Chandanagar Police Station, Cyberabad to the Government Pleader for Home. In the said letter, it is stated that one Smt. Khaja Bee, W/o. late Md. Pasha Miya, who is the mother of the petitioner, lodged a complaint on 15-07-2009 to the Station House Officer, Chandanagar, stating that she has four sons, i.e. respondents 4, 5, the petitioner and one other by name Maqsood. It is further stated that the elder son of the complainant, Maqsood, left the house, after getting married, about twenty years ago and the petitioner herein, in collusion with the said Maqsood, beat the complainant her near her house and she suffered injuries; hence she requested the Police to take action. When the Police wanted to take action based on the said complaint, it is stated that the complainant herself further requested not to take any action against her sons as she intended to settle the matter before elders. In that context, it is stated that no case is registered against the petitioner or any other person and Police is also not harassing the petitioner and interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the non-official respondents. Even according to the respondents, no case is registered against the petitioner and it is stated that they are not interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondents 3 to 9 and not harassing the petitioner. In these circumstances, I dispose of the writ petition placing the statement of the respondents, in the aforesaid letter, on record. No order as to costs. _____________________ (R. SUBHASH REDDY, J) July 1, 2010 MRR