.^-"^Uui^SS^iULfn: f—ofr*15" COURT OF CHHATT.ISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Esspontients Peti-tion (S) Ko. SffiS of20S? Shashibhushan, aged about 27 years, S/o. Tsirsm PstsL r/o. v'iHsos Pspdnosn!. Otst. Raigarh, at present o/o. R.S. Verma, Kumhar Para, KrtslaRoad, Biiaspur (CG). yersys 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through Seoretary', Department of Home, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG}. 2) The Controllsr, Ch.hatt^arh professionai Examination Board, C-168 Tagore Nagar, Raipur (CG). ^! The Di.rector General of Potice, Poiice HssdQUsrtsr Rsiour fCG). 4) The inspector General of Police cum Officer 'ncharae. SubinsDector recruitmeni sommifiee/appointing authority, Biiaspur '^.\ \\^\.i/. 5) T'ne Superintendent of Poiice, Raigar'n, Disfc Raigam (CG). 0/Vrit Petition underArttele 226 ofthe Constitution of India) '&ie Mr. SaUsh K. Agnihotri, J. Present: S.hri C.S. Patel. counsel for the Detitioner. Shri Arvind Dubev, Pane! Lawver for the StaSe. (Passed on 22nd January, The petitioner pursuant to theadvertisement dated 17-9-2007 applied for recruitment to the post of Sub-inspector (mate/femaie). In the physical test the height of the petitioner was recorded as 187 cm. The petreroner couid not be seiected as the minimum height or male member required for selection is 1S8 om. The petitioner has thereafter preferred an appeal before the Appellate Authority i.e., Chairman of Subedar/Sub-inspector Commlttee/Plaioon Commander. The committee oonsisting of t*'o doctore aaain examined the height ofthe petitionerwhichwas foundat 167cm. Accordingiy, the petitioner was not seiected and declared as disqualified. a.f.lSa»ssa,S!sas.9WJ...ic'jS;»kS»S.^tA«*£^Si3B^S!ffiS!l!!BSIiSSSS ^ ^- 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in the nrst round the height of the petitioner was found at 168 om., thereafter, in the second round it was found at 167 cm. Therefore, ihe heiaht of the petrtioner recorded in the first round shouid be acceDted. 3) The height of the petitioner has oeen examined by the Seiection ComiTiittee, thereafter by the Appellate Authorlty and it was found as 167 cm. Since the height of the petitioner is less than minimum required height of 168 cm., no direction or writ can be issued by this Court for fresh examination. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has sought for a direotion against ihe respondent No.4 to conciuct physical measuremenet before the Chief Medlcal Officer. Since the physical verification has 'oeen done at Selection Connmittee level and thereafter at AppeSiate Committee ievei, t'nus, there is no reason to direot the respondent No.4 aaain to refer it to the other medical offlcer. Even otherwise, the petitioner has right to be considered not to be appoinied on a partlcular post dehors the provisions of iaw. 4) Ther petition is devoid of merit and the petitioner has faiied to estabiish any other ground which entaite infringement his iegai, const'itutionai or statuto?y right. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed summariiy,' Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge