1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3607 OF 2009 1.Dr.Prakash S/o.Deoram Pagare and others. ...Petitioners. vs. 1.The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. --- Mr.Chandrakant Thorat & Rahul Walvekar, for Petitioners. Mr.S.N.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent nos.1 to 3. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED: 5th December,2009 P.C.:- 1. Though the petitioners have made a prayer that they are challenging appointment shown in Exhibit F , perusal of Exhibit F shows that it is 2 only a list of eligible candidates. It does not appear to be the list of the candidates who are appointed. The learned Counsel appearing for petitioners is not able to show that those persons have been appointed. Merely because the persons are selected, it does not give cause of action to other persons to challenge the selection till that selection culminates into an appointment. What is further to be noted here is that the list at Exhibit F consists of about 16 candidates, if the petitioners are challenging their selection they will have to be joined as parties, but they also have not been joined as parties. Therefore, looking to the petition from any point of view, the petitioner does not deserve interference at the hands of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Petition is, therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.)