IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 1091 of 2011. Decided on: 15th March, 2011. Kiran Lata. …Petitioner. Vs. State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. R.S. Gautam, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(i) That a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ or order may kindly be issued directing the respondents to allow the benefit of increments during the tenure period of service rendered by the petitioner and also count the said period for the purpose of pension in view of the judgment rendered by this Hon’ble Court in CWP No. 4550 of 2010 titled Ravi Kumar vs. State of H.P. and others decided on 16.12.2010 and CWP (T) No.4357 of 2008 titled Thakuri Devi vs. State decided on 27.10.2009.” 2. The petitioner claims the benefit of increments during the tenure period of service rendered by her and also count the said period for the purpose of pension. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in her favour by the judgment 2 of this Court dated 16.12.2010 rendered in CWP No. 4550 of 2010 titled as Ravi Kumar vs. State of H.P. & others. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment referred to above. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 15th March, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr) Judge.