1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 1139 OF 2007 (Neeta Divan Bhamre VS The State of Maharashtra and ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders None present for the Petitioner Mr. K.G. Patil, A.G.P. for the respondent-State Mr. R.P. Phatke, Advocate for the respondent no.3 Mr. U.S. Malte, Advocate for the respondent no.6 ... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 24.06.2011 P.C.:- 1. The petitioner and his Advocate are absent. They were absent yesterday and, therefore, the matter is kept today. 2. Mr. Phatke, points out that the petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to the Scrutiny Committee to decide his caste claim. Accordingly, Mr. Phatke states that his caste claim has already been decided on 26.2.2007. Petition is therefore dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M.T. JOSHI, J. ] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.]