IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.1229 of 2009 (M/S) Hemant Meharwal …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhnad & others … Respondents Mr. Shashikant Shandilya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondents 1 & 3. Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate assisted by Ms Geeta Parihar, Advocate for respondent no.2. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. CLMA No.6548 of 2009 (Stay Application) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the operation of recovery notice dated 24.07.2009 (Annexure No.1) issued by respondents no.3/Tehsildar, Haridwar District-Haridwar. 3. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner is engaged in Tailoring work from last 5 years. According to the petitioner for the purpose of running his own Tailoring 2 Shop petitioner took loan of Rs.1,40,000/-under the Pradhan Mantri Rojgar Yojana in the year March, 2007. Petitioner’s father was retired from service in the year 2007. Thereafter, the entire responsibility was come up on the shoulders of the petitioner. Newly established shop of the petitioner was not running in good condition and the petitioner suffered a great financial loss in his shop. Due to this reason petitioner could not pay sum of the installments in time. Due to non payment of loan, the respondent no.2- Bank issued recovery notice on 24.07.2009 for recovering loan amount alongwith interest against the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after filing of writ petition, the petitioner has deposited Rs.70,000/- and he is ready to make payment of remaining amount in easy installments. Learned counsel for respondent no.2/Bank argued that petitioner made default in making payment of installments and recovery citation was rightly issued against him. 5. During the course of the argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that financial condition of the petitioner is not good at this stage and he is not in a position to deposit entire amount of loan. He prayed that petitioner be granted permission to deposit entire amount of loan in six installments. In view of poor financial condition of the petitioner and in view of the fact that petitioner is ready to make payment of loan alongwith interest, the petitioner is 3 permitted to deposit entire amount of loan alongwith interest in six equal installments. First installment shall be deposited on or before 20th October, 2009 and remaining installments shall also be deposited on 20th of each month. Last installment shall include the interest as well as recovery charges. In the meantime, it is directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. In the event of default, this order shall stand vacated. 6. With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of. (V.K.Bist. J,) 09.09.2009 Arti 4