IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.8271 of 2011 Date of decision : 12.5.2011 Gaurav Aggarwal and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Mrigank Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, I am of the opinion that this petition is totally misconceived. The petitioners even before commencement of the examination raise questions about its credibility. There being no basis for such apprehensions the Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India cannot step in to throttle the proper and legitimate mode of selection. The petitioners plead that the prospectus is ambiguous. The contents, however, do not fortify this submission as well. It has been very clearly stipulated therein that there will be one examination of 180 marks containing multiple choice questions. Since the Court does not find any merit in the petition, the same is dismissed. 12.5.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss