1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 246/2010. ( Mahadu Narayan Pangse -: versus :- Ganpat Narayan Pangse and others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JANUARY 19, 2010. Heard Shri S.R. Deshpande, learned counsel for petitioner. Both the sons of Narayan litigating before trial Court accept that Narayan was tenant. Question was, whether Narayan was tenant in his individual capacity or as a member of joint Hindu family. Plaintiff filed application for referring that dispute to Competent Authority in view of bar and Section 100 [2] of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act. The Court below has found that, as status of Narayan was not in dispute, further issue needed to be decided by Civil Court. I am not inclined to interfere in the matter at this stage. Liberty to petitioner to challenge the said order after final adjudication, if contingency therefor arises. Writ Petition is dismissed, with no order as to cost. JUDGE Rgd.