IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16019 of 2009 SAKALDEO RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc.no. 13865 of 2009 1. MANOJ RAM 2. KARUNA DEVI 3. BAUDHU RAM 4. SUGGA DEVI @ SUGIA DEVI 5. FULO DEVI ---- Petitioners VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- 2 29.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Both the applications for anticipatory bail arise out of the same Complaint Case No. 435C of 2008, have been heard together. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that they are other than the husband even remotely related with the husband, having vague allegation only due to complainant’s differences with her husband with which they have no concern even then they are apprehending their arrest, never can be justified. I agree with the submission. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or - 2 - surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No. 435C of 2008, the above named six petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI