IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No. 523 of 2004 in L.P.A.St.No.30832 of 2004 Union of India and ors. ..Petitioners vs. Shri G.S.Kubal ..Respondent Smt.Seema Chhatre i/b Shri Suresh Kumar for petitioners. CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. 15th January, 2007 15th January, 2007 15th January, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for appellant. Respondent though served is absent. No reply affidavit filed traversing the grounds stated in the application for condonation of delay. We find that the delay has been properly explained. Delay is condoned. Office is directed to number the appeal. 2. Civil Application is disposed of. (Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI J.) 2(S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI J.) 2(S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI J.) 2(S.B.MHASE J.)