IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M No.8642-M of 2009 Date of Decision:9.3.2010 Harjinder Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. I.P.S. Kohli, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mrs. G.K. Mann, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was found innocent by way of two inquiries Annexures P-1 and P-2. However, he was not associated with the 3rd inquiry and the allegations which were inquired into while holding the 3rd inquiry were new. Be that as it may, FIR has been registered and challan has been filed. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all the pleas before the trial court at the time of framing of the charge. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 9.3.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE