IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1821 of 2010 1. Md.Mohsin, son of Safe Tulla, 2. Rajiv Kumar Das, Son of Rabindra Nath Das, Both are residents of Village Damal Badi, Police Station Pahar Katta, District Kishanganj…….........................Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, 2. The Secretary Primary Education Human Resources Development Department Bihar Patna. 3. The Director Primary Education Human Resources Development Department Bihar Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Kishanganj. 5. The Block Development Officer, Jahangirpur, District Kishanganj. 6. The Block Education Extension Officer, Jahangirpur, District Kishanganj……..Respondents With Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13503 of 2009 1. Md.Parwez Alam, Son of Molana Sher Mohammad, R/o Bel Pokhar, P.S. Paharkatta, District Kishanganj. 2. Satish Kumar, Son of Sri Rameshwar Prasad, R/o Golagachh, P.S. Pothja, District Kishanganj. 3. Md. Anwar Ala, Son of Md. Akbar Ali, R/o Saradeghi, P.S. Paharkatta, District Kishanganj. 4. Kajal Devi D/o Sri Baishakhu Pandit, R/o Maheshmara Mali Basti, P.S. Paharkatta, District Kishanganj. 5. Shyamali Das, Son of Sri Santosh Vishwas, R/o Damalbari, P.S. Paharkatta, District Kishanganj……….....................Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources and Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Kishanganj. 5. The Block Education and Extension Officer, Pothia Block, Kishanganj. 6. The Member, District Appellate Tribunal (Teaches Appointment), Kishanganj. 7. The Mukhiya, Jahangirpur Panchayat, Pothia Block, Kishanganj. 8. Panchayat Secretary, Jahangirpur Panchayat, Pothia Block, Kishanganj. 9. Smt. Najeda Khatoon, D/o Md. Tasiruddin, R/o Village Maheshmara, P.S. Paharkatta, District 2 Kishanganj. 10. Md. Mohsin, S/o Safe Tulla, R/o Village Damal Badi, P.O. Paharkatta, District Kishanganj………………………………………………………….Respondents ------------- 3 23.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the respondents. Interlocutory application bearing I.A. No.10352 of 2010 has been filed in CWJC No. 13503 of 2009 by one Md. Mohsin (Petitioner of CWJC No. 1821 of 2010) who claims that the impugned order of the Appellate Authority is in his favour which has been challenged by the petitioners of CWJC No.13503 of 2009 in the case. Hence, through this I.A. he has sought to intervene in the matter. The interlocutory application is, accordingly, allowed. The said intervener is directed to be added as respondent no.10 in CWJC No. 13503 of 2009 in course of the day. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that out of five petitioners of CWJC No. 13503 of 2009, grievances of petitioner nos. 2 to 5 have been redressed. Therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw 3 this application so far as petitioner nos. 2 to 5 are concerned. The writ application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn so far as petitioner nos.2 to 5, namely, Satish Kumar, Md. Anwar Alam, Kajal Devi and Shyamali Das are concerned. From the order of the Appellate Authority dated 22.09.2011 produced before this Court, it appears that the Appellate Authority is postponing decision in the matter of the writ petitioners of these two writ applications on the ground that their writ applications are pending in this Court. In the circumstances, these writ applications are disposed of with a direction to the Appellate Authority to take a final decision in the matter of petitioners in accordance with law preferably within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)