IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SRI VILAS.V AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 822 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 27/03/2008 in WP NO : 5380 OF 2003 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 State Bank of Hyderabad., Rep. by its Chief General Manager, Gunfoundry, Hyderabad. 2 Chief Manager (Personnel) Administration Department, State Bank of Hydrabad., Hyderabad., 3 The Asst. General Manager, State Bank of Hydrabad., Regional Office, Tukaram Complex, Ambedkar Road, Karimnger District., 4 The Branch Manager, State Bank of Hydrabad., Peddapalli Main Branch, Karimnagr District. ..... APPELLANT(S) AND Mohd. Sultan Pasha, S/o. Mohd Osman, R/o. H.No. 2-5-80. Nalla Pochamma Wada, Peddapalli (M) , Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:MR.ADDEPALLI SURYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.GANTARAMAKRISHNA The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per Anil R. Dave, CJ) Being aggrieved by the order dated 27-3-2008 passed in W.P.No. 5380 of 2003, this appeal has been ﬁled by the employer who has been directed by the learned Single Judge to consider the case of the respondent for giving appointment on compassionate grounds. Upon perusal of the impugned order and upon hearing the learned Advocate appearing for the appellants-employer-Bank, we ﬁnd that the learned Single Judge has simply given a direction to consider the case of the respondent for giving appointment on compassionate grounds. The only direction is to consider the case in accordance with the policy of the appellants-Bank and, therefore, we do not see any reason to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Judge. Needless to say that if the respondent is not eligible to get appointment on compassionate grounds as per the policy of the appellants-Bank or as per the settled law, the application can be rejected by recording reasons. We do not ﬁnd any substance in the appeal and the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. _______________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 11th August, 2008. _____________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J GRR