[ T J£%égPU IN THE HIGH COURT OF MAEHYA PRAEESH ‘ v ‘of 1992 ka%&3 Between M.F. No. Smt. Vasanti Rath, aged about 37 years, wife of shri Gopi Vallabh Rath, kesiding at present at B—BQ/E, B;S. Coiany, Kirahdul, Post Kirandul, Tahsil Bantewada, Bistrict Bastar (M.P.) nd National Minera1‘Development Cdrperation Limited, A Government,cf Ihdia Undertaking and a Transferred’Cgmpany as defined in clause (g) of subysection(1) of Sectioh 2 Companies (geestructuring) ahd Misce1laneous of the Public Sector Iron and Steel Provisions Act, 1978 (Act mo. 16 of 1978), havim!g its Registered Office situate at lO-3-ii/A, Castle Hills, Masab Teak, Hyderabad (Andhra Pradesh) — Pin Code 5G0 923, Through its Chairman ~ Cum - Managing Birector, FEving its office at 10-3-12/A, eastie Hills, Nasab Tank, Hyderabad (Andhra Pradesh), Pin Code 500 023.‘ The Genera1 Manager, Badladilia Iron Ore Tahsil Dantewada, District Bastar (M.P.) The Senior Personnel Manager, Eailadilla Iron are Project, Deposit No.'lh, Kdrandul, ‘5 Post Kirandul, Tahsil Dantewada, District Bastar‘(M.P.) PETITIGN UNDER ARTICLES 226 ANB 227 0F_l§£ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF NECESSARY NRITS, GRBER$ &N9 DIEECTIONS Project, Beposit do. 1h, Kirandul, Post Kirandui, Petitioner- Eeepcndente W R A HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 3806 of 1992 9 “ PETITIONER : Smt. Vasanti Kath. ‘ ‘ RESPONDENTS 1 National VERSUS Mineral Development Corporation ‘ l Limited &~Others. } 1 PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ' I 1:? SB: Hon’ble Shri'Pritinker Diwaker, J. . W V ii, "W. W HVE WV l 1 l l Amit Present: Shri Ajit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.S.Koshy, Advocate with Shri Vinod Deshmukh, ‘ V Advocate for'the respondents. 9. 939w (Passed on 25“ day of August, 2010) Shri Ajit Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner suomits ‘ that at this stage, he may be permitted to.withdraw the present petition He with libertg; to file appropriate representation before the respondents. however, prays thata direction may be issued to the respondents for deciding his representation expeditiously. 2. In View of the above submission made by Shri Singh, learned counsel w for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to Withdraw this petition with the aforestated liberty. 3. 'In the eventuality of tiling of a representation by the petitioner, the be decided in accordance with law as expeditiously as same would be possible. I ‘ Sc”. i H 1 Pritinker Diwa'ker Judge