"\ uLi^^adl- COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR ^7RIT PETITION.No. 253 of 1992 PETITIONERS : 1. Shaifaddm 8/oKamar M. 2. Hussain Mi S/o Kamar Ali 3. .4nisuddin S/o Shamsuddm 4. Aininuddm S./o Shamsuddin 5. Shamsuddin S/o Numddin 6. Fazluddin S/o Niimdin 7. Ziaur Rehman S/o Sheikh Almiad 8. Bhikhamal S/o Jethanand 9. Sirin Bai Wd/o Mohsin Ali lO.Heeralal S/o Harchumal 11. Hiromal S/b Suganamal All shop owners R/o Jawahar Bazar, Raipur. 12.Dawood Klian S/o Shaifuddin R}/O Jawahar Bazar, Raipur. VERSU8 RESPO^TDENTS : 1. State of Madhya Pradesh, throu^i Collector, Raipur. 2. Mumcipal Corporation, Raipur throu^i Coniiiiissioiier, Municipal Corporatioii, Raipur. %1UT PETITION LTNDER .^RTICLE 226/227 OF TEffi CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hoii'fele Shri Satish K. Asmhotrl, J. Pressnt: Shri Prashant Jayaswal, Senior Advocate with Shii Vinay Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners. Shi'i H.B.Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Shri Pankaj Agrawal, , Advocate for the respondeiit No. 2, QRALQRDER (Passed on 12th day of Febmar\', 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearmg for the respondent No; 2 submits that if the application is made by the petitioners for allotiiient of altemate site, the petitioners will be allotted a.1temate site and necessaty coiisequential documentation will be done as early as possible, givisig preference to the choice ofthe petitioners. The order will be passed within a period of two week-s from the. ofreceipt ofthe application, filed by.the petitioners. 2.' In view of the categorical statement made by the leamed counsel for the respondent No. 2, according to the ieamed counsel for the petitioners, nothing survives in this matter. 3. This petition !s accordmgly disposed of. The petitioners are directed to make applicationby 15(hofFebmary, 2008. 4. Interim relief graiited earlier will continue till the order is passed by the respondeitts. . • ' - r~~ I Sd/- SatishK.Agmhotri Judge " .^