IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 431 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 431 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 431 OF 2005 Priya Naresh Athavale....Petitioner Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr...Respondents Mr. Chandrakant N. Chavan, for the petitioner Mrs.A.K. Savla for the respondent. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE: 7TH JUNE,2006 P.C. . Petitioner had sought reliefs by way of part occupancy. Respondents have filed a reply of one Ghadge Navnath Sopanrao, Sub Engineer dated 17th January, 2006. In paras.5 and 6 it is pointed out that the petitioner has not complied with various requirements. Considering the above it will not be open for us to exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction. Hence no interference called for. It will be open to the petitioner to take such steps in law to comply with the requirements of the Corporation. . With the above observation petition stands disposed of. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J). J). J).