1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION No. 5975/2010. Sau. Nirmala Ravindra Durge -VERSUS- State of Maharashtra and another. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 07, 2011. Heard Shri G.K. Mundhada, learned Counsel for petitioner and Shri Kankale, learned A.G.P. for respondents. Shri Mundhada, learned counsel for petitioner has contended that the request made by petitioner for mutation is kept pending without passing any orders. He invites attention to the communication dated 26.07.2010 and points out that it makes a demand for no objection from office of Collector. According to him, looking to the nature of tenure 2 enjoyed by the petitioner, said no objection is misconceived and bad. Learned A.G.P. contends that communication dated 26.07.2010 may be assailed in appeal as per the provisions of Section 247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The impugned communication is dated 26.07.2010. The appeal period has expired long back. Petitioner has made representation against that order to higher authority i.e. Superintendent of Land Records. Considering the time already spent, we permit the petitioner to make representation to the Deputy Superintendent of Land Records in this respect, within two weeks. If such representation is made, the said Authority shall hear the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in the matter as early as possible in any case within a period of 4 weeks from the date of it's presentation. With this direction, Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Rgd