IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1416 of 1992 Date of Decision : December 02, 2009 Ved Pal Sood ....Petitioner Versus Dev Pal and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present : Mr. V.G.Dogra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.K.Singla, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Ms. Archana Saini, Advocate for Mr. Ashok Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.3. T.P.S. MANN, J. (Oral) By a common order, the present revision as well as Civil Revision No. 3063 of 1992 are being disposed of as both of them pertain to recovery of arrears of rent, or, in the alternative, compensation for use and occupation or mesne profits of shop No. 177, East Side, part of Khasra No. 177/1, situated in Bartan Ganj, Moga. It is not in dispute that Ved Pal Sood, who was the petitioner in both the revisions, has since died and survived by his son Kamal Sood and others and said Kamal Sood is having authority on behalf of all the other legal heirs of late Shri Ved Pal Sood to enter into a compromise. Further, even Dev Pal-respondent has also died leaving behind Vinay Pal C.R. No. 1416 of 1992 -2- and others as his legal heirs. Also, Lok Raj-respondent has since died leaving behind his son Ashok Kumar as his legal heir. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 states that Kamal Sood son of late Ved Pal-petitioner has entered into an agreement with Vinay Pal-respondent No.2 and Ashok Kumar son of Lok Raj- respondent No.3. All the disputes pending between the parties have been amicably settled and nothing was due from Ashok Kumar son of Lok Raj as well as from Vinay Pal and other legal heirs of Dev Pal-respondent. The compromise in this regard has been recorded on 28.5.2009, which has been duly signed by Kamal Sood, Ashok Kumar and Vinay Pal (Kashyap). The aforestated has not been denied by learned counsel for the petitioner. The compromise dated 28.5.2009 has been produced, which is taken on record as Mark A. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that in view of the aforementioned compromise, both the revisions are to be withdrawn. In view of the fact that the matter has been amicably resolved by the parties and nothing is due from any of the respondents or other legal heirs to Ved Pal Sood-petitioner and his heirs, both the revisions are dismissed as having been withdrawn. ( T.P.S. MANN ) December 02, 2009 JUDGE ajay-1