IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R.No. 3264 of 2007. DECIDED ON : 05.07.2007. Brij Lal and another Petitioners. VERSUS Gian Parkah and another Respondents. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present: Mr. Brijeshwar Singh Bhalla, Advocate, for the petitioners. PERMOD KOHLI,J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 19.5. 2007 passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division), Moga closing the evidence of the defendants-petitioners It has been clearly recorded in the impugned order that so many opportunities were allowed to the defendants for production of the evidence and only one witness was present to be cross examined on the date of the passing of the impugned order. No other witness was present. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that as a matter of fact one more witness was present, who even got his affidavit attested on the same day, but due to certain circumstances, he could not be produced for evidence. Be that as it may,I do not find any infirmity in the Civil Revision No. 3264 of 2007. -2- impugned order. At this stage, learned counsel submits that one opportunity may be allowed to produce only one witness namely Charanjit Singh who even got his affidavit attested on the date of the passing of the order. In the interest of justice, petitioners-defendants are allowed to produce this witness on 7.8.2007, the date already fixed in this case, on their failure to do so, the order impugned shall remain in operation. July 5, 2007 (PERMOD KOHLI) Anoop JUDGE