IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 21233 of 2000 Between: Kalyana Sreenivasa Enterprises, Rep by its Proprietor A.Sridhar, S/o Sri Umanaheswararao, R/o Door No.7/120, Shardanagar, Anakapalle, Viziagram District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Deputy Executive Engineer, Housing Corporation, Pederu, Visakhaptnam District. 2. The Project Officer, I.T.D.A., Pederu, Visakhaptnam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in canceling the petitioners tenders to supply Mangalore tiles by Telegraphic orders dated 31-10-2000 unilaterally without affording an opportunity to the petitioner is illegal, unjust, arbitrary and violative if Art.14 of the Constitution of India, and further direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to participate in the tender; and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. C. Upendra, Advocate for MR.E.V.BHAGIRATHA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: MR.V.CH.NAIDU The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri C. Upendra, Advocate, representing Sri A.V. Bhagiradha Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive. Therefore, no further adjudication is necessary in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ____________ (G. ROHINI,J) Date: 03.12.2004 Ksn ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Deputy Executive Engineer, Housing Corporation, Pederu, Visakhaptnam District. 2. The Project Officer, I.T.D.A., Pederu, Visakhaptnam District. 3. Two C.D. copies