cp166.10 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 166 OF 2010 Ashok Kacharu Bhamare ...Petitioner Versus Ramendrakumar V. Joshi and others ...Respondents ..... Mr. Girish Rane, advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.P. Shah, advocate for respondent ..... CORAM: R.M. BORDE, J. DATED: 18TH APRIL, 2011 PER COURT:- 1 The petitioner is alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 12.11.2009, passed by this court in writ petition No. 6223 of 2009. The writ petition tendered by the petitioner was allowed in terms of prayer clause “A” of the petition. Prayer clause “A’ of the writ petition deals with grant of benefits of settlement dated 27.10.1996 from the date of discontinuance till the date of filing of complaint. The petitioner is making grievance in respect of refusal to extend benefits of leave encashment in favour of the employee by the employer. It is an admitted position that the settlement dated 27.10.1996 does not deal with the issue of leave encashment. In this view of the matter, it cp166.10 -2- cannot be concluded that there is any willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in the aforesaid writ petition at the hands of employer. The contempt petition is devoid of substance, and same stands rejected. ( R.M. BORDE. J.) rlj/