IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 25TH BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 25563 of 2009(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- THE MANAGER, M.T.M.HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PAMPAKUDA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.KURIAN GEORGE KANNANTHANAM, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.TONY GEORGE KANNANTHANAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA. SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI MUHAMOOD T.T THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.25563/2009-M ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 16th day of September, 2009 J U D G M E N T The writ petition is filed mainly challenging the orders leading to Ext.P5 whereby the appeal filed by the Manager was rejected. The petitioner is the Manager of the school. 2. Under Rule 8 of Chapter XIV A K.E.R, the petitioner can avail of the remedy of revision before the Director of Public Instruction in the matter. Therefore, leaving open the said remedy, the writ petition is closed. Needless to say that if any revision petition is filed by the petitioner, the Director of Public Instruction will consider the same and pass orders in accordance with law after hearing the respective parties. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms