1 C.A.NO.3517/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3517 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO.1593 OF 2009. Sachinkumar Devidas Patil & others. ...Applicants. VERSUS Tukaram Ambadas Shimpi and others. ...Respondents. ... Mr.S.P.Shah,Advocate for the applicants. Mr.Pawankumar Pawar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Respondent Nos. 5 & 6­Served­Absent. ... CORAM: A.V.NIRGUDE,J. Date : 11th September, 2009. COURT’S ORDER: 1. The application seeks condonation of 141 days delay in filing the Second Appeal. Though the application is opposed orally, I am inclined to allow it, mainly because the Civil Application in cognate appeal seeking condonation of delay has 2 C.A.NO.3517/2009 been allowed by this Court, a few days back. In view of the fact that the appellant was plaintiff seeking specific performance of a contract for sale of agricultural land and despite this, he had delayed filing of the appeal, he should be directed to pay costs to the respondents No.1 to 4, who are opposing this application. 2. The application is allowed subject to payment of costs of Rs.1000/­ (Rs.One Thousand only) to be paid to the respondent Nos. 1 to 4. (A.V.NIRGUDE,J.) lkp