HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO C.R.P. No.2633 of 2010 ORDER: Heard both sides. At the request of both the counsel appearing for the parties, the main revision petition itself is taken up for hearing and disposal at the admission stage. The petitioner who is the proposed defendant No.3 filed this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, assailing the correctness of the order dismissing the application in I.A.No.12 of 2009 in O.S.No.6393 of 2005 on the file of VI Junior Civil Juge, City CivilCourts, Hyderabad, purported to have been filed under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, seeking to implead himself as proposed defendant no.3 in the suit. The Court below while dismissing the application held that the impleadment of the petitioner amounts to affect the title of the parties and that since the petitioner is no way connected to the dispute between the respondents 2 to 4/plaintiffs and respondent No.6/D-2, the rights of the respondents have to be determined. Further, the petitioner is nowhere connected to the present cause of action. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed this revision petition. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is the owner of the Mulgi in first floor in 21st Century complex bearing premises No. 5-8-112 to 173 situated at Nampally, Hyderabad, whereas the respondents 1 to 4/plaintiffs claim themselves to be the owners of the said premises including cellar, ground and first floor portion in the said complex and that when the petitioner used to park his vehicle in his designated place, the 6th respondent started objection and then he came to know the pendency of the present suit and therefore, he prayed to implead him as a party in the suit for the effective adjudication. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondents, and on perusal of the impugned order, I am of the considered view that the questions as to whether the disputed premises is a part of the suit property and which may or may not be affected on the rights of the other owners are to be determined only after the petitioner is allowed to be impleaded. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed. Consequently, I.A.No.13 of 2010 in O.S.No.6393 of 2005 is allowed. The trial Court shall dispose of the suit itself within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ 31st March 2011 KVR