IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19519 of 2009 AJEET KUMAR ROY @ AJEET RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 18.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Torture is alleged for non-fulfilment of demand of Rs. 50,000/- and a motorcycle in dowry that is countered on the point that the complainant was pregnant which could be detected when she was taken to a doctor after complaint of stomach pain. There was negotiation on the point and she left for her parental house. Apprehending any misdeed, the matter was informed to the Chief Judicial Magistrate. If really pregnancy was there and if any other same type of matter was existing not to continue the matrimonial relation that could be taken for divorce or for declaring the marriage void. It is apparent that just after marriage there was differences in between both of them. Torture is made a ground for offence and that cannot be disbelieved due to not taking cognizance against five of six alleged accused persons. Informatory petition clearly shows that a defence was created to justify the act of torture. Thus I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, it is rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI