IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5825 of 2005 DR.CHHOTE LAL SINGH, S/O- LATE RAM KRIPAL SINGH, R/O- MOHALLA – PROFESSOR COLONY, COLLEGE ROAD, P.S. – JUMAI, DISTRICT - JUMAI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. VICE-CHANCELLOR, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR 3. THE REGISTRAR, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR 4. FINANCIAL OFFICER, TILKE MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR 5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PTNA 6. THE PRINCIPAL, K.K.M COLLEGE ----------- 6. 04.05.2009 Heard. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that during pendency of this writ application, petitioner has received the retiral dues. However, still there are some amount required to be settled by the university which has not been done as yet. Learned counsel for the University on the other hand submits that the claim of the petitioner is not specific therefore, it was not possible for the University to file specific counter affidavit with regard to the above. Considering the above facts and circumstances, petitioner is permitted to file a representation before the respondent no. 2 with regard to his remaining claims, if any, distinctly supported by the relevant documents within a period of four weeks. In case such - 2 - representation is filed, respondent no. 2 shall consider the same and dispose of it by reasoned order expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation. Upon such consideration, if the representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, the above respondent shall simultaneously issue necessary orders so that the grievances of the petitioner, as raised in the representation, could be redressed without delay in the light of the order passed by him on such representation. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)