THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA M.A.C.M.A.No.3522 of 2009 Dated:22.10.2009 Between: Padala Padma Priya, And others. ….Appellants And A.Madhusudhanarao, And others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA M.A.C.M.A.No.3522 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) When this appeal was listed on 21.10.2009, learned Counsel for the appellants was absent and there was no representation. The matter, was therefore, directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Today the matter is appearing under the said caption as item No.1. In spite of the same, none appears for the appellants and the learned Counsel for the appellants is absent. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed for default/non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) ________________ (B.N.RAO NALLA, J) 22.10.2009 vs