IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION (S/S) No. 1075 of 2011 Mohd. Yameen ………….Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …...Respondents. Present : Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate present for the petitioner and Mr. Anil Kumar Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand. The petitioner had worked as an instructor under the non-formal education programme for certain period on a remuneration of ` 200/- per month between 1996- 2001. The petitioner contends that direction be given to the respondents to consider his case for appointment as “Siksha Mitra”. The petitioner also claims parity with other instructors who have been given such appointment. No such prayer can evidently be granted to the petitioner. At this stage the petitioner says that for the same relief he has already moved a representation. The writ petition is therefore disposed of with the direction to the authority concerned to decide the representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. With the above observations, writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 20.8.2011 Avneet