1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION (CAA) NO.44 OF 2009 IN APPEAL AGAINST ORDER NO.18 OF 2008. (ABDUL WAHID S/O. ABDUL WAHIB..Vs..RADHESHAM P. MAHESHWARI KARWA & OTH..) _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Shri S.S.Deshpande, Advocate for Appellant. Shri N.N.Motghare, Advocate for Appellant No.2. Shri A.H.Lohiya, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1(a) to 1(d), 2 to 4, 5(A) to 5(C), 6 and 7. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : JULY 18, 2009. 1. This Civil Application No.44 of 2009 is filed by appellant No.1 Abdul Wahid Abdul Wahib and respondents No.1 (a) to 1(d) for settling their dispute in terms of compromise embodied in this application. Appellant No.2 Krishnarao Bhimrao Deshmukh objects to this application. In this Appeal against Order, on Civil Application No.2135 of 2008, interim stay was granted to the proceedings in execution. 2. The learned counsel for the parties agree that, for the present appellant Abdul Wahid Abdul Wahib and respondents No.1(a) to 1(d) may be allowed to file compromise in the executing Court on which the executing 2 Court may pass appropriate orders after hearing of the parties. To that extent the counsel agree that the interim order passed on 18th March, 2008 and Civil Application No. 2135 of 2008 be modified. 3. In view of this, interim order on Civil Application No.2135 of 2008 is modified. Appellant No.1 Abdul Wahid Abdul Wahib and respondents No.1 (a) to 1(d) are permitted to file compromise embodied in CAA No.44 of 2009 before the executing Court on which the executing Court shall pass appropriate orders after hearing the parties. 4. Civil Application (CAA) No.44 of 2009 is disposed of in the above terms. 5. The learned counsel for appellant No.2 Krishnarao Deshmukh states that he would take steps to have appellant No.1 transpose as respondent in this Appeal against Order. 6. S.O. to 10th August, 2009. JUDGE RR.