IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellanious No.11168 of 2011 ====================================================== Santu @ Karu .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s 2 27-04-2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case NO. 18/2011 registered under Sections 341, 323, 386, 354, 304/34 and 376/511 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda. The accusation against the petitioner is to have caught hold of the informant and pushed her, in the meantime, the husband of the victim came when accused fled away. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that even assuming the accusation, the case at best is made out under Section 354 of the I.P.C. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner has substance. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail of the petitioner keeping in view the fact that the accusation apparently appears to constitute offence prima facie under Section 354 I.P.C. With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed off. Amrendra/- ( Dinesh Kumar Singh ,J)