IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32940 of 2010 RINKU DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No.20/2004 registered under Sections 341,323,324,504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, but subsequently charge sheet submitted under Section 326 of the I.P.C. Admittedly, during the course of the investigation, petitioner was released on bail by the police but when police submitted charge sheet under non-bailable Sections, the petitioner approached the learned Sessions Judge, Khagaria by filing anticipatory application but her prayer was turned down. The allegation against the petitioner is that she had given one sickle blow on the right shoulder of the informant. It appears that the aforesaid injury was found grievous in nature though the doctor has 2 not specifically stated that the said injury was found on shoulder rather he used medical term. Moreover, considering this aspect of the matter that the petitioner is a lady and earlier she was released on police bail and the occurrence had taken place in the year 2004, I think it proper to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In the event of arrest/surrender, the petitioner, namely, Rinku Kumari shall be released on bail furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Khagaria, subject to condition as well as under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. in connection with above stated Beldaur P.S. Case No.20/2004. PN/AKV ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)