IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.539 of 2009 CHANDRA KISHORE KUMAR, son of Rajdeo Prasad Singh, resident of Parsa Bazar, P.S.- Parsa Bazar, District- Patna. ------ Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ Opposite Party. ----------- 2 19.2.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 414, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he had purchased the TATA 407 Maxi from one Sunil however, he could not get possession because the TATA 407 Maxi had been stolen and that the chassis number had been changed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has tried to submit before this Court that his vendor had got chassis of the vehicle changed and that the ownership paper of the TATA 407 Maxi was subsequently granted to Anil Yadav. It appears that on investigation it was found that the earlier purchaser of this TATA 407 Maxi could not be traced and the vehicle is said to be stolen one. 2 Considering the allegations I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail application is dismissed. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)