IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Criminal Misc. No.33408-M of 2007 Date of Decision:11.02.2008 Darshan Singh .....Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. P.K.Ganga, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Ghengas, DAG, Haryana. Mr. A.S.Sullar, Advocate. **** RAJESH BINDAL, J. The allegation against the petitioner in the FIR are that he had entered into an agreement for sale of his land with the complainant and the sale deed was not executed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he never entered into agreement rather one Subhash, Property Dealer, with his master mind had misused the signed papers of the petitioner and against whom he has already lodged FIR. Though as per the agreement to sell dated 15.10.2005, the sale deed was to be executed on 1.5.2006 but no civil suit was filed by the complainant and it was only on 7.3.2007 that the present FIR was lodged. The dispute prima-facie seems to be of civil nature. However, without expressing any final opinion thereon, the interim bail granted to the petitioner is made absolute. The petition is disposed of. February 11, 2008 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) renu JUDGE