CORAM HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISIONBENCH HON'BLE MR. S.R.NAYAK. C.J. AND HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRi. J. ^ Petitioners WRIT PETSTION N0.2581 OF 2001 1. Ms. Radhika Singhania, Aged about 25 years D/o Sushii Singhania 2. Karunesh Singhania, Aged about 21 years S/o Sushi! Singhania 3. Akhilesh Singhania, Aged about 17 years S/o Sushil Singhania, Minor - through Guardian Ms. Radhika Singhania R/o 445. South Ardmore Avenue, F!at No.215 Los Angeles, California, USA No.1 to 3 through Attorney Smt. Alka Singhania, Aged about 38 years W/o Shri Pradeep Singhania "Singhania Bhawan" House No.12/373, Subhash Road Raipur Chhattisgarh 4. Priyesh Singhania, Aged about 19 years S/o Rajendra Singhania 5. Mitesh Singhania, Aged about 17 years S/o Rajendra Singhania, Through Guardian Mother Smt. Jyoti Singhania W/o Rajendra Singhania 6. Ruchika Singhania, Aged about 14 years D/o Pradeep Singhania, Through Guardian Mother Smt. Alka Singhania W/o Pradeep Singhania 7. Aayush Singhania, Aged about 12 years S/o Pradeep Singhania, Through Guardian Mother Smt. Aika Singhania W/o Pradeep Singhanja 8. Shruti Singhania, Aged about 13 years D/o Arun Singhania, Through Guardian Mother Smt. Anita Singhania W/o Arun Singhania 9. Abhishek Singhania. ^ed about 11 versys Respondents years S/o Arun Singhania, Through Guardian Mother Smt. Anita Singhania W/o Arun Sjnghania No.4 to 9 R/o "Singhania Bhawan" House No.12/373, Subhash Road, RaipurChhattJsgarh 1. Registrar, Debts Recovery Tribunal Jabalpur 2. Recovery Officer. Debts Recovery Tribunal Jabaipur 3. The State Bank of India, Through its Manager Ravi Bhawan Raipur. Chhattisgarh 4. Sushil Singhania S/o Kishanlai Singhania R/o Los Angeles, California USA 5. Pradeep Singhania S/o Late Shri Kishanlal Singhariia R/o 12/373 Subhash Road Raipyr Chhattisgarh 6. Smt. Manjulata Singhania W/o Shri Sushil Singhania R/o Los Angeles CaliforniaUSA 1 7. M/s Singhania Steels Private Limited Urla Industria! Area Raipur Chhattisgarh Present : Mr. R.S.Marhas. counsei for the petitioners. None appears forthe respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 20tn of September, 2006) S.R.Nayak, CJ.: The foiiowing order of the Court was passed by Learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of the Court to withdraw this writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge