AB 654/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K. MUSAHARY Heard Mr. B.M. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing or the accused petitioners. Also heard Mr. B.S. Sinha, learned Addl. P.P. Assam. C.D. has been produced. I have perused the same. I find no materials against ac cused petitioner No. 2, Smti. Bhabani Devi and petitioner No. 3, Smti. Jugomaya Devi who are aged about 45 and 52 years respectively. Both the petitioners Nos. 2 and 3, being married ladies, live separately from the family of informants. In view of the above, the interim order dated 10.03.2011 in respect of petitione r Nos. 2 and 3, is made absolute on the same terms and conditions. As regards pe titioner No. 1, some materials are found against him but I find that he being a Government servant in the Excise Department as Excise Constable, I am not incli ned to grant bail to the petitioner No. 1. Accordingly his petition is rejected. However, he may appear before the learned CJM, Kamrup, Guwahati within a period of 2 weeks time and file appropriate application for granting him bail, if so a dvised and on receipt of such application the learned CJM, concerned shall consi der and dispose of in accordance with law. During this period of two weeks, in the event of arrest in connection Noonmati P .S. Case No. 27/2011 the accused petitioner No. 1 Sri Jagannath Sarma be release d on bail of Rs. 30,000/- with one local surety of the like amount subject to sa tisfaction of the Arresting authority. The bail application is disposed of.