IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42856 of 2009 1. GYANTI SAH @ GYANI SAH, SON OF LATE LAXMI SAH. 2. BAHARAN RAM, SON OF LATE CHHABILA RAM, BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE SARDARGANJ, BISHNUPURA, POLICE STATION MASHRAKH, DISTRICT SARAN AT CHAPRA. …..Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. ----------- 02/ 08.01.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Counsel for the State. The Complaint Case No. 1579 of 2005, Mokama, Chapra has resulted into First Information Report under Sections 364, 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code wherein the complainant/informant Mandila Devi has alleged that her son Ramchandra Sah had gone with these petitioners and others. When the informant’s son did not return then it was alleged that her son might have been killed. Submission is that similarly situated accused Manju Sah has already been enlarged on bail on 12.12.2008 vide Cr. Misc. No. 38381 of 2008. There is no witness of the occurrence. The petitioner had no motive either to kill or made the dead body to disappear. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners are directed to be released from custody on bail on 2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Rakesh Mishra, learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with U.Tr. No. 182 of 2009 arising out of Mashrakh P.S. Case No. 47 of 2006. kksinha/ ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)