1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.236 OF 2009. Manoj Shripal Jain ...Petitioner. VERSUS. Dilip S/o Panalal Dahale and and another. ...Respondents. ------------------------------------------ Mr. R. F. Totla Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. U. S. Malte,Advocate for respondent no.1 ------------------------------------------ (CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR, J ) DATE : 7th September,2009. PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The learned Counsel for the parties state that the parties have settled dispute outside the court and they have filed the compromise petition, which is verified by the Registrar(Judicial)(marked “X”). In view of terms of the compromise, the offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act will have to be permitted to be compounded. The effect of section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is that, every offence punishable under the said Act is now compoundable. 2 3. In view of compounding of the offence vide compromise petition, the revision petition is disposed of and petitioner stands acquitted of the charge. ( V.R.KINGAONKAR, J ) MTK/cri.Revn.236.09