IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 10236 of 2008. Decided on 15th July, 2011. Hari Ram. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. L.N. Sharma, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent No. 5. : Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate. For respondent No. 6. : Mr. Harmeet Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Bimal Gupta, Advocate. None for respondent No. 4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has applied for the post of Primary Assistant Teacher for two Schools, namely, Government Primary School, Sikroha and Government Primary School, Surhar. Petitioner has secured 54 marks when his candidature was considered for Government Primary School, Sikroha and the selected candidate has secured 55 marks. Petitioner has secured 50 marks when his candidature was considered for Government Primary School, Surhar and the selected candidate has secured 51 marks. Since the suitability of the candidates has been seen by the duly constituted selection committee, this Court will not sit in appeal over the recommendations made by the same. Moreover, no 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - malafides have alleged against the members of the selection committee. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 15, 2011. (bhupender) - 3 -