IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM Nos.7706 & 7707-C of 2010 in RSA No.881 of 2006 Date of decision: 28.7.2010 Sanu Ram and others ......Appellant(s) Versus Lakhmi Chand and others ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Manoj Chahal, Advocate for the applicant-appellants. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral) This appeal was dismissed in default on 26.4.2010. Vide these applications, prayer has been made to recall the aforesaid order dated 26.4.2010 and restore the appeal to its original number. A perusal of an application for restoration shows that no reason has been mentioned for non-appearance of Mr. Ashok Arora, Advocate, who was admittedly the counsel for the appellants. Neither any affidavit of Mr. Ashok Arora, Advocate, has been filed to state the reasons for not appearing before this Court on 26.4.2010. Even this is not the case of the appellants that they were present in the Court. What is being explained in this application is only the delay in filing application for restoration but the absence of the counsel or the appellants themselves on the date fixed is not explained in any manner. Thus, I find no reason to grant the prayer as made in these applications. Resultantly, the application for restoration of the appeal as well as the application for condonation of delay in fliing the aforesaid restoration application, are dismissed. July 28, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE