Civil Revision No.1623 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1623 of 2010 Date of Decision:10.03.2010 Hardeep Singh .... petitioner Versus Amarjit Singh & anr. .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.Sukhpal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): This is defendant's revision petition challenging the impugned order dated 02.02.2010, whereby his application for taking his specimen signatures in the Court for examination and comparison of the same with disputed signatures has been dismissed. Challenging the aforesaid order, learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that in a suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell dated 28.05.1995 allegedly executed by the petitioner in favour of the respondents, he had taken a specific stand in the written statement denying the execution of the alleged agreement to sell and submitting therein that he never signed the said agreement to sell and the same was a forged and fabricated document. It is also the case of the petitioner that his disputed signatures are in Punjabi language whereas he never signs in Punjabi and he always signs in English and thus it was in the interest of justice that an opportunity be granted to the petitioner to get the comparison of his specimen signatures with the disputed signatures. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused Civil Revision No.1623 of 2010 2 the revision petition and the documents attached along with this petition. It is not in dispute that vide Annexure P-4, plaintiff- respondent had moved an application dated 04.05.2001 directing defendant No.1(petitioner) to give his handwriting and specimen signatures in Punjabi script in the Court for comparison with the disputed signatures. The aforesaid prayer of the plaintiff-respondent was contested by the petitioner by filing reply Annexure P-5 and the Court directed the defendant vide its order dated 05.05.2001 to give his specimen signatures. However, defendant-petitioner did not come present for giving his specimen signatures as per the aforesaid order. Not only this, defendant had filed another application with the same prayer which was got dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 26.08.2008. In view of the aforesaid facts which could not be disputed, I find no merit in this revision petition. Dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 10.03.2010 neenu