^'•^. II.'EHB.BI®G0UBI lo( 'c'1•-S • ^?CC--' A?_ BI£ASPffi (XSBWS13GSSE) i:IIJN! t; WBIT FSsxsres yoS.&zse^ sow M Eiianar Jain, Props K/s» Wooctwerld < Fanai^'Bre SBfeg ) near O.G.M. eiiort:, Aflnied_eol©iy,Nal^ar c^owK, Balptir," ; Tahs &Dt;Raipur(G.G). " ~ ' Vs. 1. Manoaarlal, aged abou-fc^O years, son of late Hanakram AKuja. ^L^. 2. Prakasalal Ahaja, aged abQUt 48 years,; son of lat^ Nanaferaa Aaaaa. 11 BotM resl.aeKbs of iiouse Ne.l<-?1, raear K!; '^Sw^-'SS^'X^^S^: •Q'e^'^en&f^:^'tasa^-Q'S!-^^ •^f^y^'"^^s^s:agWg'''K^ ";'::CQ^»fc,Bs^W^,,iEaa.&jBt; :SSJ.gBEF^:::i{e. &); •T^::- .:;;:.;,*;-Ji:lrti:-SW»»***^S^:..i,'"-/-^;i\^!: • ^—^f: . • ^ '.";' • ..:/.'^/^' ;.,~. :..•"•:"- .:r •/.:' - .'.. " '• ; ••' ':•• \'\ ••• •; ^ ^ •••\; ^ ••'.• ;i!:»; ^^^si^-s^'"s^y »»'TO?>! t; ;: r!"T XI-HO-22 3II^?I?iI Ri-litl alBSiil aiiii* W^l pl<' •sRgT^naiwPiE^ate?, [s"a»'s< sf^f 'qa^ ....^.s.^ *ii*ini shNicn tare^st' 2004- 3?i^?r ^*di^ ^ri^cr - Arfricle (Anne(<ure^> 24.12.2004 1;.' ' ,•. -; Onamentionl ingmade,the Smt. Anju AHu^ja^counsel for Bythis writ petitionunder the petitioner hcisquestionedthe order dated 4th August, 2004 &istrict 3ud9e, Rdipur;iwherebytl'ie| the arrenrs of rerit undisir 5e< Accommoddtion Control Act, dlrecTe|d rent from the month of February, month in theCourt. Brief facts leading to fitin9 ctf therecord, are that ttie^petitionepj rent fromone Late Nanakram Ahuja, Ahuja explred leavlng behlnd the i hissons.As the petitioner failed notice To hlm to/pay the rent of petrtioner failed •h> pay the pent, as a suit under the Chhatti^arh arrearsofrent. The petitioner averments that he has paid renf tc| Nanakram ^huja and the brothef purchasedthe disputedpremisesfr4 t* AWfall'l Hlial ^'fest'^^R ^;N;TO31I^t ^dse istaken up for hearing. I'hepetitjoner. 227 of the Constitution of India, fe^dlity, propriety and corpectness of the (Anne(<ure^-5),passed bythe 4ti'Additiondt leai-ried tridl CburtafterdeTermining ^i-ion 13 (6) of fhe [ Chhotti^arh the petitloner herein to deposlt the |2004, a» the rate of Rs.6/300/- per ctf this wTit petition as bome out from [herein took the disputed premises on and'during the tenancy Late Nanakram ^pe|spon(lenTs hepein and one Suntl Atiuja, pay the rent,the pespondieiri^ gave a fhe djsputed premises. (-towever, the jxresult ofwhichthe reqiondentSifiled Accdriimodation Controt Act for evictlon afld lier'leJnfttedaWritterifFhatietnientwiththe Sunil Ahujq, oneoft'he-sons of.t.ate; <^f the ptamtiffs, larter' on he has atso (m Sunil Ahuja and he is not the fenan't' .<v.» SltJB \.s^ .l.;! .A\ .^" ";!'t1 "'"T'l' XI-HIS-22 lan^a'^l ti^sn^t y^*-n^ ^S^t -it/p' - J \^ I i ^-^lilft^WS^MW^ i-IIKPIt^btllch t? 200^- 'Ns^a' siR&t^tliaintiita ^ aihd •rtie .^f.the^plaintj^fs, fhe Fespondentj 3'iadge vjde jftie impugned order| laetjtioner to depMit 4he aame. has prefewed thfswrit'peTftion. I have heat-d leamed \ admission, Learne^l counsel for the tfifiputed the tenqncy and taken stj ^ 1 ..' . : . : .• ;: - th& brothertof^the reSjWndents; •riierefore.'in tha-urcumstances, the rent unleas it is provect that respondents. But, X do^not •fjhd any sub!S^ the respondents, .elcuming ttiefflsetv|s Late Nanakram^ Ahujfli ^fwni whonj premjses^orit-<!rit,ffleda3uitf<?r grwind of de1:ault. Ther'efor'e, on -has rightty cletermined'thigr'ent the ^ent. This directionis in of SectiOn 1.3 of the Chtwttisgarlt no+find any illegality and infirmity In the cjrcumstances, the stfgeitself. Nocosts. Wing coun^eltfor the pa+itioner bn the questjon of pet(tipnep3ubfflfl-stha*since the petitjoner!has nid that he was the tenant of Suml Ahiya, he tiea put'chased the tiisputed ppemises, trial Court ought not to have deter'mlned I'he petitioner herein is the tenant ofthe coi'iSononce <<iWlcl<il-< 'O'-lcff 'S 1^^ ^RgR %3lPOT3II^?T \ ;herejri. Tlie learned Atiditional &istrjct determiried the pent and directed the •^» • ' • . • . • aggrjeved by this order, the petitioner an-ecB-S ttie arid ^anee <n this or'9UWe"t for •fhe reason tl'xit ^is.londlordAAeirgjsonsandte^theirsiof the petitioner hepein topk the dispu+ed ofrentahdefictjonofth^lanclonthe! l^sofplei^r^sofsuitthetrialCourt dinscted the'petitionepi'iepeinto.dieposit wifh thffipr0visioosofsub-sectioh(3) (<tccommo<lBtionGontrQlAct. As such;! do +hc impugnect order. i^rit petition is dismissecl at the admission Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge .i^i !« ''•'•\.i:'; I'MBI