dgm gm gm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1372 OF 1995 PETITION NO.1372 OF 1995 PETITION NO.1372 OF 1995 M/s.Vishal Wines registered partnership through its partners L.M.Rajput and K.M. Rajput, Age: Adults, Occ.Business, at Panna Chambers, Dapodi, Pune-12. .. Petitioner Vs. 1. Collector of State Excise, Pune having his office at 14-A, Sachu Waswani Road,Pune-411001. 2. Commissioner of Excise, Maharashtra having his office at Commissioner of State Excise, Bombay. 3. State of Maharashtra (Notice to be served on the Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra, Home Department, State Excise, Mantralaya,Bombay-32. ..Respondents Mr.Prafulla Shah for the petitioner. Mr.A.I.Patel, AGP for respondents 1 to 3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : ANOOP V.MOHTA,J ANOOP V.MOHTA,J ANOOP V.MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 16th March, 2009. : 16th March, 2009. : 16th March, 2009. ORAL ORAL ORAL JUDGMENT: JUDGMENT: JUDGMENT: The petitioner has challenged the impugned orders passed by the respondents dated 13.09.1994, 1.11.1994, 4.5.1995, whereby permission to the petitioner to shift the liquor business from Dapoli to new premises at Bhosari was refused. 2. This Court by order dated 25.07.1995 admitted the writ petition and granted ad-interim in terms of ( 2 ) prayer in para 19(b i). In the result, the petitioner has been running his liquor shop in the new premises i.e. survey no.198 at Bhosari. 3. By an affidavit of April, 2008, the petitioner has placed on record subsequent events which are necessary to decide the issue raised in the petition. Those documents are copies of property card in respect of the shop premises at Bhosari, renewal fees of the said liquor licence and a certificate in respect of the premises at Bhosari to indicate that it is authorised premises. 4. Taking all this into account and to avoid further delay, it is desirable that the respondents to consider the petitioner’s application which was rejected earlier, afresh in view of above and pass order accordingly, as the petitioner has complied with basic requirements in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed off. No order as to costs. Interim order granted by this court to continue till the decision. No costs. ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)