IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28329 of 2008 CHUNNU @ CHUNNA @ NASEEM AKHTAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offences under Sections 353, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is to the effect that e the informant was taken by a group of 20-25 persons while he was intercepting a Truck carrying contraband Nepali betel nuts. It is further alleged that this petitioner reached their and on his intervention the informant was released. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case falsely for ulterior purposes by the police since some times back also the petitioner was implicated in a false case of motorcycle theft, as stated in paragraph 9 of this petition. In the said case the higher police officials on supervising the case found that the vehicle in question belonged to the petitioner. The petitioner was allowed anticipatory bail in that case. It is further submitted that although the occurrence is of 20th January, 2008 however the case has been lodged on 22. 01.2008 without any valid justification. 2 Having considered the submissions, as noticed above, and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, namely, Chunnu @ Chunna @ Naseem Akhtar be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj, in connection with Dighal Bank P.S.Case No. 9 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)