-: 1 :- wp-9843/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9843 OF 2010 M/s. Sumova & Anr. ..Petitioners. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9842 OF 2010. M/s. Shree Mahalaxmi Credit & Commercial Services & Ors. ..Petitioners. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Nikhil Karnawat i/b Nivit Srivastava for the petitioners. Mr. A. S. Desai for R-4. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : March 7, 2011. P. C. : 1. Writ Petition No. 9842 of 2010 is not on board. Counsel for the respective parties submitted that the subject matter of Writ Petition No. 9843 of 2010 and Writ Petition No. 9842 of 2010 is one and the same and hence these two writ petitions are already tagged together. Hence, by consent of parties, Writ petition No. 9842 of 2010 is taken on board and heard alogwith Writ Petition No. 9843 of 2010. srp -: 2 :- wp-9843/10 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners in both the writ petitions seeks leave to withdraw writ petitions with liberty to challenge the certificate issued under section 101 of M.C.S. Act, 1960 granted in favour of respondent no.4 and against the petitioners by filing revision under section 154 of the M.C.S. Act, 1960. 3. Mr. Pawar, learned counsel for respondent no.4 states that if the petitioners file revision application challenging the certificate issued u/s 101 of the M.C.S. Act, 1960, the respondent no.4 shall not oppose the same on the ground of limitation. The statement is accepted. 4. In the above facts and circumstances, both the writ petitions are disposed of by passing following order. -: O R D E R :- (1) Leave with liberty as prayed for is granted. (2) Both the petitions are disposed of as withdrawn. (3) In the event, the petitioners file revisions under section 154 of the M.C.S. Act, 1960 after complying with the provisions of sub-section 2A of section 154 of the M.C.S. Act, 1960, challenging the recovery certificate issued u/s 101 in favour of the respondent no.4 and against the petitioners, within a period of four weeks from today, respondent no.3 shall decide -: 3 :- wp-9843/10 the same as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of 6 months from the date of filing. (4) In order to enable the petitioners to approach the revisional authority by way of revisions, for the period of four weeks from today, respondent no.4 will not take any coercive action against the petitioners. (RANJIT MORE, J.)