IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DECEMBER 2009 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3899 of 2009() ------------------------------ CRA.No.68 of 2008 of SESSIONS COURT,KASARAGOD C.C.No.75 of 2006 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-I, HOSDURG REVN. PETITIONER: APPELLANT/ACCUSED -------------------------------------- T.P.RAMACHANDRAN, S/O.LATE RAMA VARIYAR, KOTTAPPARA, P.O.PULLUR, PULLUR VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK. BY ADV. SMT.T.SUDHAMANI RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT ---------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. K.BADARUAL MUNEER, S/O.M.KUNHAHAMMAD HAJI, MUKKOOD, KEEKKAN.P.O, HOSDURG TALUK. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RITHWIK THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.S.GOPINATHAN, J. ------------------------------- Crl.R.P.No.3899 of 2009 -------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of December, 2009 ORDER The Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-I, Hosdurg in C.C.No.75 of 2006 convicted the revision petitioner for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to simple imprisonment for three months and to pay Rs.65,000/- as compensation to the second respondent under Section 357(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In Criminal Appeal No.68 of 2008, while confirming the conviction, the sentence was reduced to imprisonment till rising of the court. The order to pay compensation was sustained. Now this revision petition. 2. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that he is seeking only time for payment of compensation. The submission made by the learned counsel is recorded. The revision petition is dismissed. The revision petitioner is granted six months time to remit the compensation. P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE skj