IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH:NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1182/2008 Suraj Tiwari & anor ..vs.. State = ================================ CORAM: S.R. DONGAONKAR, J. DATE:4.6.2008 Heard Mr. Jaiswal, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Sonare, A.P.P. for state. This is an application u/s 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail. Applicants are apprehended for the offences punishable u/s 394 r/w of I.P.C. and u/s 4, 25 of the Arms Act in crime No.198/2007 of P.S. Ramtek. According to applicants, case is false. However, the affidavit filed by the respondent – State reveals the the offence has been committed by the applicants and that the applicants and other accused Raju have threatened the complainant by knife. Knife blow was given near his right eye and the cash and mobile were stolen. They had also threatened another person coming towards Ramtek by name Duryodhan. The threat by knife was also given. Sessions Court has rejected the bail application of the applicants for good reasons. As regards the question of identification, it appears that the applicants were apprehended and they were immediately taken to police station, at that time they were identified by the complainant. In these circumstances, as the trial is likely to commence in near future, this application cannot be granted. Applicants shall be at liberty to move for bail, if trial does not conclude within six months. Accordingly this application is rejected. Learned trial Judge is directed to expedite the matter. JUDGE smp.