IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18290 of 2008 PRITAM YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.18059 of 2008 BHAGOLI BISHWAKARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 13.05.2008 Both the petitioners who were arrested on 16.12.2007 from the house in which several parts of country made weapons in different conditions were found suggestive of an organized manufacturing activity pursuant to aforesaid Hilsa P.S. Case No. 475 of 2007 instituted under the Arms Act. Both the petitioners were admittedly arrested there. On behalf of petitioner Bhagoli Bishwakarma, it is submitted that he had gone in the house but had no concerned with the occupant or the things found therein. Whereas, petitioner Pritam Yadav, who is the house owner, states that he had let out the house to Bhagoli Bishwakarma who was his tenant and is a black- smith, suggestive that it is he who was manufacturing arms as a tenant. Be that as it may, in view of the facts as found, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. The bail application of petitioners is rejected. However, they may renew their prayer before the Trial Court after charges are framed. Trivedi/ (Navaniti Prasad Singh,J.)