IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2605 of 2011 SMT. RUBY DEVI & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 420, 467, 478, 468 and 504 of the I.P.C. It is alleged against Munshi Prasad that he executed sale deed with regard to the land of the complainant. It is further submitted that petitioner no.1, Smt. Ruby Devi is bonafide purchaser of the land in question whereas petitioner no.2, Chitranjan Kumar is husband of petitioner no.1. The impugned order reflects that there was some dispute between the complainant and petitioners with regard to title of the land. Considering the nature of accusation, let the petitioners, Smt. Ruby Devi and Chitranjan Kumar be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with C.R. Case No. 339 of 2010, T. R. No. 3006 of 2 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M.,Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P. C. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)