IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 31ST AUGUST 2010 / 9TH BHADRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 4574 of 2010() ------------------------------------------ CMP.NO.7624/2010 OF MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT, SOUTH PARAVUR. .. (CR.NO.39/2010 OF CHATHANNOOR EXCISE RANGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT) ......... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED NO.1: --------------------------------------------------- HARIKRISHNAN,S/O.RAJENDRAN NAIR, RESIDING AT PARIYARATHU BUNGLAW, MARUTHAMONPALLI DESOM,POOYAPPALLY VILLAGE, FORM PADINJATTATHIL VEEDU, PERAYIL, ULIYAKOVIL CHERRI, ULIYAKOVIL VILLAGE, KOLLAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.NIREESH MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY EXCISE INSPECTOR, EXCISE RANGE OFFICE,CHATHANNOOR, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bail Application No.4574 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATED: 31st day of August, 2010 O R D E R Petitioner, who is the 1st accused in Cr.No.39/2010 of Chathannoor Excise Range for an offence punishable under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act, for having been found in possession of 150 liters of spirit on 17.7.2010, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. I am not satisfied that both the grounds enumerated under Clause (b)(ii) of Sec. 41 A of the Abkari Act are present in this case so as to justify the release of the petitioner on bail. This Application is accordingly dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. dmb