Crl. Misc. No.25304-M of 2007 Raj Kumar Vs. State of Haryana. Present:- Mr.K.S.Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Narinder Sura, AAG Haryana. *** Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is facing trial for the offence under Section 306 IPC. He is in custody since 12.11.2006. The FIR has been registered on the statement of Kanika daughter of RajPal. It is stated by her that she was married with Rajesh about six months earlier to the occurrence. The marriage was solemnised on their own which was not to the liking of her in- laws. Therefore, she was harassed by her in-laws. For the last one month her husband had also been harassing her. Then the complainant purchased one tablet from the Chemist which is used in the wheat and she swallowed it as she was fed up with her life. It is further stated that there was no demand for dowry. The said statement is the dying declaration of the complainant Kanika. The trial in the case is likely to take time. The effect of the statement as given is to be gone into by the trial Court after evidence has been led. As already noticed, the petitioner is in custody since 12.11.2006. In the circumstances, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, lest it may prejudice the case of either side, the petitioner on furnishing personal bond and surety to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panipat shall be admitted to bail. ( S.S.SARON ) 10.5.2007. JUDGE Reema