1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 3280 of 2009 Girijaprasad v. State of Maharashtra -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr R.P. Joshi, Adv for applicant Mr D.B. Patel, APP for State Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J Dated :16th Oct 2009 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that although accusations are serious in nature, investigating agency has not yet collected material enough to reveal prima facie involovement of the applicant therein. Learned APP objected grant of bail on the ground that witnesses have identified Girijabai. Copy of memorandum prepared by the Executive Magistrate is shown to me, but it appears that accused was touched by hand and identified, but on what ground and why he was identified, is not appearing in the memorandum. Be that as it may, merely pointing out finger towards a known person is not enough. Some incriminating material must appear to believe prima facie 2 involvement of the applicant in the alleged crime. 2. In view of the above, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant on certain conditions. Hence, the following order. 3. Applicant be released on bail in Crime No. 73/2009 registered with Police Station, Chandrapur (City) under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code upon his furnishing PR Bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. Applicant shall attend Investigating Officer as and when called during day hours till filing of charge-sheet. She shall not try to tamper with prosecution evidence in any manner and shall leave his permanent address as also telephone/cell phone number, if any, with Investigating Officer and shall communicate change therein, if any, in future. Application disposed of. Hamdast granted. Judge. Hsj