—78 sf^s w R-ii* 'cTSTT 37T^?T ^*-fi®b 'Sv^ •^WW<1, VSiS\W , VfvftWy, NW^I *HI<* "^ 200 an^?r ira% (^f^a??*) ^wiwgfTOsn^t SIN6LE BENCH: HON'feLE JUSTECE DHIREN&RA MISHRA W.P. flZZT] NO.Z012/08 Petitioner Non-aDDlicant Vs Resoondents cate for the petitioner. for the 5'tate. 04.04.2008 Mr. Yoge^i Pandey, Adv| Mr. Arun 5ao, 6ovt. Advl Heard. The petitioner has fitetl Constitution of India praying f)ar the following 1. To issue a writ dated 12.12.07 ^i^I<1*t^ Hl-4<'ff ^f^fs^ <P*lt$K ^ stRPT-5TI^?1 Nare^tdra 5in9h, 5/o Late Snri Brahma }l|i, Age about 49 years, R/o Gram- 6ovi4da, Post-Chatera, Tahsil-Awan9, Distf: Raipur (C.6.) 1. S|tate of Chhattisgarii, through its 5^cretary, Mineral Resources t^svelopment, Montralay, &.K.5. Bpilding, Raipur, District Raipur (C.6.) 2. Dfrector, Seology A Mining, C(ihattisgarh, ftaipur (C.G.) 3. Tjie Cotlector, (Mining Dept) Distt. ^ahasamund (CG) 4. ^uadh Ram Sonwani, S/o Shri Puron L(il Sonwani, R/o ©nim-Mudhena, Tjihsil-Aanmg, Distt: Mahasamund (46). REVISIONIST this petition imder Art-icle 227 of the reliefs:- certiorari quashing the impugned order (/(NNEXURE P-5) passed by the reqiondent I %S^'-i;':Xl-HC—78 'Sa... sf^ss vi h-u* ^SIT 13n^?T ?t)*lict» 7S31 ri||<||<?»<|, ^Tfly'Ko, Rlrtl.yy NWdl *t11<h WI, 200 3d^?r ^ra% (^if^a^f) No.l in the inter mandamus calling r 2. To issue ony othi Hon'ble i inter^st of justice ond to issue a writ of ^cords from the respondents. ^r writ, order or direction, which the Court deen^s fit in the interest of justice. Minitig matt-erlto Learned counsel for the in favour of respondent No.4 No.2-Director, ©eology& Respondent No.4 preferred an and the State ©ovemmentvid^ appeal and remitted the matter afresh in the light of •th| Srievance of the petit| continuing with extracting petitioner herein thou9h quarr^ has already been set aside. •rtie Collector is not proceeding months since the same remitted Learned counsel for the be disposed of with a direction) Dept), Mahasamund to expet: <sr>Nlcl4l*1 +1H<:lf Tf,1^rt' <f;aq<^l< ^T sifBtT 31^1 t)etitioner submits that the quarry tease (lerein was set aside by the respondent I, Raipur vide order of Annexure P-4. i(ppeal against the order of Annexure P-4 order of Annexure P-5 disposed of the the concerned Collector to decide the observations made in the order. oner is that respondent No.4 is still from the land be!on9ing to the lease in favour of the respondent No.4 grievance of the petitioner is that with the matter even after tapse of four for fresh adjudication. Ipetitioner submits that this petition may |to the respondent No.S-Cotlector (Mining the matter and dispose of the mifierals FUrther petlite >*R XI-8C—78 TE^ "41'tll^, SlTflu'IS, fatfiyy 3T[^?f 'VS K-\ W sn^T sniiqi ^ W^V\\ *^l«b sn^f TRR; (1^f^?w) ••^ 200 e«ii^T-yfett ^11^1 -^-t above ditection No.l4 opplication of respondent N| specified period as per direct) Leamed counsel for tht disposed of with the Accordingty, the instonl the respondent No.S-Collecto application of respondent lease with respect to the hectare situate at Village the directions contained in th< P-5 within a period of three of this order. Consequently, l.A. No.1 Certifiad copy as per rifles. 'hilld^l'f 'WRlf ^fS(zt <(a|«cl< i?3iRn3n^i i.4 for grant of quarry lease within the on of Anne^ire P-5. State has no objection if 'the petition is petition is disposed of with a direction te (Mining Dept), Mahasamund to decide the t-Awadh Ram Sonwani for grant of quarry |and bearing Khasra No.333/1 area 0.55 M^dhena, Distt. Mahasamund in the light of order of the State ©ovemmentAnnexure n|onths from the date of production of copy .1 |ilso stands disposed of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge I