IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 17613 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: July 13, 2010. Gora and another ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. A.S.Manaise, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Bhawna, D.A.G., Punjab. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.49 dated 25.04.2010, under Section 380 IPC, registered at Police Station Rangar Nangal, Police District Batala, District Gurdaspur. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. A coordinate Bench of this Court while issuing notice of motion on 23.06.2010 passed the following order:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and CRM No.M-17613 of 2010 the buffalo in question is already with the complainant and even the petitioners were not named in the FIR. Notice of motion for 13.7.2010. Meanwhile, in the event of arrest of the petitioners, they shall be released on interim anticipatory bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction, subject to the following conditions:- (i) that they shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer and when required; (ii) that they shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer, (iii) that they shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have already joined the investigation pursuant to said order dated 23.06.2010 It has also been stated by learned counsel for the State that petitioners have joined the investigation and that they are no more required for any custodial interrogation. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of Gora and Goldy, is accepted and order dated 23.06.2010 granting interim bail in favour of the petitioner is, hereby, made absolute subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. 2 CRM No.M-17613 of 2010 ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) July 13, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 3