..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.182 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.163 OF 2007 Ramchandra Ganpat Jadhav ...Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.V.N.Shingnapurkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.J.C.Satpute, Counsel for C.B.I. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP, for State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 20th February, 2007. DATED : 20th February, 2007. DATED : 20th February, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant-orig.accused No.2 and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant has been convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for six months. The applicant is now seeking bail. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicant ..(2).. states that the applicant was on bail during the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. This statement is not controverted by the prosecution. 4. Looking to the above facts and the evidence, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. 5. The applicant to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.20000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. 6. Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)