HI6H COURT OF CHHATTES6ARH AT BILASPUR V»'ritPetition No- 7700 of 2007 Petitioner Versus Raspondents 1- 2. 3. Mohonial Kaushik. s/o iate 5hri Sar.jsm Prssad faushik, aged d?out 28 years, ft/o vilia9e Kopon Akaltara, Tahsi! and bis+t. Janjgir- Champs (C.&) 5tate of Chhattisgarh, TTii-ough: The Regis'trar, CooperaTiye Societ*/, Raipur(C.&) The Onwf Executive Officer Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank .^irysdit, Bilouspur (C.6.) The Pr-esideri-!-, Jiia Sahakar-i fendriya Bank Maryadir, BitdSpur (C.G.) WRTT pFnnoN UNESER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTIPJTZON QF ZNDZA Sjngte Bench : i-jon'bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotr-i. J. -5hri 5nmeer Behar, Adyocate for Ihe petitioner, Shri Ajay Dwivedi, ESeputy &>vt. Advocate for the re^iondent No.l. br. Rajesh Pandey, ^dvocate for •rtie resporidents No. 2 anc! 3. ORAL ORDER ,-tk y-asssd ors ih'ss 30T" d<r/ of Juns, 200S) }. By" this petition, the petil'ioner impugns the order da'ted 2.9.2006 (Annexur-e P./l), whereby the case of the petitioner for grant of compussiona+e upnointment hos been F>ei"Wi"!~t'ed •i'o be conffldered subiect to fumishinQ cer'hiin information. 2- ~ br. Pandey. iearned counse! uppearing for the respondents No. 2 ond 3 submits •rtint in pr-inciple, it hos been decided to consider the cose of the petitiorier, but for- want of detaiis ubout assets and other sources of income of the petitioner, the case could not be considered. 5econd!y\ some amount is due i^sinst the petitioner and 5. ut present no yscancy- is sysiiabie. Se tilut as it may, if the petitiuner gives cotrip!e+B tletails of asgets/property, sour-ce of income and fiie his response to the conditi'uns No- 2 and 3, his case may again be consider^d for grant of coiTipassionate uppointmerit. Tni vieui of the ctear and categoricoi dtu-tement inode by &r. Pandey, ieamed counsel appeoring for -rt-ie responden+s No. 2 and 3, it 'iS c!esirab!e -rfiat the peti+ioner shouid approach the concerned authorities witii coinpiete details and make a proper- representution in re.spEc.i of conditions No. 2 snd 3 mentiiined in the order dated Z.9.200S -9-200S, to eriuble the concemed authority' to pass appropriate order. If any gpievance sti!! survives, the peti+ioner would be at iiberty +o agitste •j+ie same, if so udvised- In v'iein of the foregoirig. this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge > ia. Thakur