IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH MARCH 2011 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1932 CRP.No. 653 of 2010() -------------------------------- SR.1/1997 of TALUK LAND BOARD, NILAMBUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): --------------------------------- 1. KUNNUMMAL MOHAMED, S/O.KUNHARAMU, KUNNUMMAL HOUSE, THRIKUNNASSERY, KOORAD, KOORAD P.O., KALIKAVU, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. KUNNUMMAL PATHUMMAKUTTY, D/O.MOHAMMED, KUNNUMMAL HOUSE, THRIKUNNASSERY, KOORAD, KOORAD P.O., KALIKAVU, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 3. KUNNUMMAL AMINA, D/O.MOHAMMED, KUNNUMMAL HOUSE, THRIKUNNASSERY, KOORAD, KOORAD P.O., KALIKAVU, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.SHRIHARI RAO SMT.N.SHOBHA SRI.K.S.BALAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. TALUK LAND BOARD NILAMBUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LR), COLLECTORATE, MALAPPURAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676505. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM, MALAPPURAM P.O.-676 505. 3. TAHSILDAR, NILAMBUR, NILAMBUR.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679 329 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KALIKAVU VILLAGE, KALIKAVU .P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 525. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 001 R1 TO R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.L.SAJEEVAN THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts P. BHAVADASAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C.R.P. No. 653 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 15th day of March, 2011. ORDER The claimants under Section 85(8) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act approached this court assailing the order dated 19.8.2010 in S.R.1 of 1997. The claim was laid in respect of 17 cents of land in Re.Sy. No.700/1 of Kalikavu Village. The claimants produced the purchase certificate. The Land Tribunal found that there is variation in the purchase certificate and the document produced by the petitioners. Petitioners say that they want only an opportunity to establish that both the properties are one and the same and they may be given an opportunity to do so. Moreover, the learned counsel pointed out that the petitioners have sufficient evidence to show that they are entitled to the reliefs sought for. C.R.P.653/2010. 2 2. Considering the nature of the claim made, it is only proper that the petitioners be given an opportunity to establish the identity of the property or their right to the property. This revision petition is allowed, the impugned order, as far as the petitioners is concerned, is set aside and the matter is remanded to the Taluk Land Board for fresh consideration in accordance with law and in the light of what has been stated above. The petitioners will be entitled to adduce further evidence in the case and the Taluk Land Board may dispose of the matter within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sb.