INTHEHIGH CQURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR M.A.C /<T9j£ 2009 APPELLANTS NONAPPLICANT-3 1'.^^ ^'^J^--- ^s&...—" ....^^ ^'^••^'w RESPONDENTSdl CLAIMANT RESPONDENT (2) NQN APPLICANT 1 (BUSDRIVER) RBSPONDENT 131 BUS OWNER NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. THROUGH : DIVISIONAL MANAGER TAHA COMPLEX, VYAPAR VIHAR BILASPUR (C.G.) VERSUS SAMMAR SINGH S/0 JETHOO SANTA AGED 35 YEARS R/0 BARIDIH TAH. KOTA DISTRICT BILASPUR (C.G.) DINESH NIRMALKARAGE 32 YRS S/0 BAHORANNIRMALKAR R/0 MOHADA P.S. KOTA TAHSILKOTA,DISTr.BILASPUR SANDEEP KUMAR SAHOO 50 YRS S/0 JIWANL^^g^^^^^,,.^ DISTT7BILASPUR(C.G.) APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF M.V.ACT 1988 AGAINSTAWARD PASSED ON 18.3.2009^BY TRIBUNAL-CUM- DISTRICT JUDGE BILASPUR IN CLAIM CASE N0. 98/08 :-22 y ^TT^T^FT f^ii^ $t>*iicr» <ii^a $t)^i°r) ^ iCvr -^oET ^iqiciq, ^TTt<1<|(o, f^<ni<1^< *11^Cfll 5b*licb 3i7^?r T^^ yA^l.^..:..!.Q^ •f^ST' M/200? 3?T^T'^RITW^rf?H ct)l^(<n<I1tl 'RTTT^Jf ^^^t <f^l<^l< ^r 3rf;w 3h^r S.B. Hon'bleShri Justice N.K.Adarwal 04-01-2010 Shri Shreekumar Agrawal. $enior Advocate with Shri ^iarid Gupta, counsel for the appellant. Learned Senfor Advocate submits that in faet the said accident occurred with the Snsurecl vehicle on the date of accident and the Insurance Company is liable and is responsibte to satJsty the award, but due to cterical mistake (nstead of mentioning vehicte No. C.G. 10-A/9597which is the vehijste involved in the accident and insured with the appellant/lnsurai|ice Company, jnadvertentty the claimant mentioned the vehide's ^egistration number as C.G. 10- A/9596 and due to that the appeH4nt^lnsurance Company is unable to satisfy the award and therefore, (he appeal may be dispos^j of by clarifying thatthevehicle involved iiji the accldent is C.G. 10-A/9597. ! ... . -; _ . '. '\. .^ ..-'.. . .. \ '. ........ ..: In view of the submission i^iade hereinabove, the appeal is disposed pf with the clarification |that the vehicle invoh/ed In the accident is C.G. 10-A/9597. Sd/- Certified copy as per rules. ^ ^ Agrawal Judge [^ft^ $fa^