1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1644 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO.617 of 2004 Citibank N.A. ... Plaintiffs. vs. Kaizer A.Chunawalla ... Defendant. --- Ms.Rekha Taware i/b. M.V.Kini & Co., for Plaintiffs. None for Defendant. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 1st April,2005 P.C.:- By ad-interim order dated 7th July,2004, the Court granted ad- interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) and directed the plaintiffs to file undertaking in terms of Rule 148 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules. The learned Counsel for the plaintiffs states that the plaintiffs have not filed an undertaking as per the ad-interim order. No explanation is also given as to why such undertaking is not filed. In view of this conduct of the plaintiffs, Notice of Motion is disposed of. Ad-interim order operating is vacated. ----