1 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 854 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1025 OF 2008 Shri Aaditya Satish Parakh ...Appellant. Vs. M/s Samrat Activity (AOP) & Ors. ... Respondents. ..... Mr. R.S. Apte, Sr.Counsel i/b Mr. A.A. Garge, for the Appellant. Mr. G.S. Godbole, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. ..... CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATE : 26 th APRIL, 2010. P.C. 1. The Appeal from Order impugns the Trial Court’s Order dated 3rd May 2008 restraining the Appellant-original Defendant No.7 from dispossessing the first Respondent-Plaintiff from the suit property and creating any third party interest or alienating the same. 2. On notice being issued, this Court passed an Order dated 6th May 2008 directing all parties to the suit to maintain status-quo in respect of suit property. That Order is continuing till date. 3. After hearing Shri Apte, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant and Shri Godbole appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 and 2, I am satisfied that interest of justice would be served if the Order 2 dated 6th May 2008 is continued further and during the pendency of the suit. The Trial Court also to make an endevour and dispose of the suit in question early. Needless to mention that continuation of the Order of this Court is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of all parties. 4. Appeal from Order is disposed off in these terms. No costs. In the light of disposal of the Appeal, Civil Application does not survive and is disposed off. (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)