IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6593 of 2005 INDU DEVI, WIFE OF LATE RAJENDRA PRASAD SHARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TAJPUR, P.O. TILKEY, P.S. MAKHDUMPUR, DISTRICT JAHANABAD. ---PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, GOVRNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GAYA CIRCLE, GAYA. 4. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, HAJIPUR ANCHAL, HAJIPUR. 5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. 6. THE DIRECTOR, PROVIDENT FUND, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 7. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, HAJIPUR. 8. THE FINANCE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. ---RESPONDENTS ----------- 7. 30.4.2009 It has been stated on behalf of the respondent-State as well as the Accountant General that the retiral dues of the petitioner as detailed in the counter affidavit have been sanctioned long back. The learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to state whether the payment has been received or not till date by the petitioner. However, in view of the statements made in the counter affidavit and the supplementary counter affidavit, the petitioner does not want to press this writ application. It is submitted that in case any amount is found unpaid, the petitioner shall be entitled to raise her grievances before the concerned authority. Considering the submissions of the parties, the writ application is dismissed as not pressed, however, with liberty that if any admissible amount is found not paid, the petitioner will be at 2 liberty to agitate the same before the concerned appropriate authority within a period of two months. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)