IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2008 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1614 of 2008() ------------------------------ C.C.NO.13/1993 OF THE COURT OF THE SPECIAL JUDGE (SPE/CBI-1), ERNAKULAM DATED 22.05.08. REVN. PETITIONER: -------------------------------- T.P.MURALEEDHARAN, HOUSE NO.31/224 A, PUZHPANJALI, L.M.PAILY ROAD, VYTTILA COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.ALAN PAPALI RESPONDENTS: ------------- CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, KOCHI, REPRESENTED BY THE STANDING COUNSEL, CBI, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.M.V.S.NAMBOOTHIRY THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/05/2008 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.R.P.No.1614 of 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 23 rd day of May, 2008 ORDER I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/2nd accused and the learned Standing Counsel for the CBI. 2. In the circumstances of the case, I do not think it necessary that the court should shut out the defence evidence if the same is has the potential to tilt the scales, as contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner shall be given two weeks time from today to complete his defence evidence before the trial court. The impugned order dated 22.5.08 passed by the Special Judge (SPE/CBI-I), Ernakulam in Crl.M.P.No.426/2008 shall stand modified to the above extent. This Crl.R.P is disposed of as above. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj