IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28000 of 2009 DHARMA RAJ SINGH, SON OF LATE BHOLA SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAVINAGAR, P.S. JAMUI, DISTRICT JAMUI VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 05.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the first information report. His name transpired in the confessional statements of Md. Jabir and one Pappu Mandal. However, both of them have been allowed bail by this Court, as stated in paragraphs 8 and 9 of this petition. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has not been put on test identification parade and there is no recovery from his possession. It is stated that petitioner was an accused in one case in which he has been acquitted. He submitted that except for the same, petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Petitioner is in custody since 17.09.2007. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this application is allowed. Let - 2 - petitioner (Dharma Raj Singh) be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. – V, Jamui in S. T. No.51/09 arising out of Jamui P.S. Case No.208/06 with conditions as laid down in sub- section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)