1 Appln 5768-10 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5768 OF 2010 Rahul Keshav Dhaygude ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.A.P.Mundargi, Senior Counsel with Mr.Vinod Jadhav, for the Applicant Mrs.S.D.Shinde, Advocate, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 14TH JANUARY, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for anticipatory bail by an Advocate in connection with C.R.No.193 of 2010 for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201, 109, 114, 120-B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Satara Taluka Police Station, Satara, who is alleged to have been 2 Appln 5768-10 involved in conspiracy of murder of a girlfriend of one Sunil Girkar, who is dead. This conspiracy came to light because one Pervez Hanif Sheikh, who was in police custody in some other Crime No.174 of 2010 made such a statement before the investigating officer. Pervez Hanif Sheikh, thereafter, ran away from the police custody. Pervez Hanif Sheikh had mentioned participation of Hemant & Pappu Kachare and Hemant and Pappu have been admitted to bail by Order dated 6th January, 2011. A dead body was recovered but it was in a decomposed state. It is not yet known as to whose dead body it was. It is not, thus, clear as to what the investigating officer seeks to achieve by subjecting the applicant to custodial interrogation. 3. In view of this, in the event of arrest, applicant be released on bail on his furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs.50,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of 3 Appln 5768-10 Rs.50,000/- on the following conditions. (i) The applicant shall report at Satara Taluka Police Station, Satara for interrogation on 17th January, 2011 at 6:00 p.m. and thereafter, as and when required by the investigating officer. (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. . The order will remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge sheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court dated 2nd December, 2010 delivered in Special Leave Petition (Cri.) No.7615 of 2009 (Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State of Maharashtra And Ors.). 4. Criminal Application is disposed of. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.) 4 Appln 5768-10