Civil Revision No. 7133 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 7133 of 2010 Date of Decision: 1.11.2010 Adarsh Pal Singh and Others …Petitioners Versus Sham Lal …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. H.S. Bhullar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate for the caveator/respondent. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Admittedly, a Private Limited Company had rented out the premises to the respondent/tenant. The petition was filed under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as “1949 Act”) to plead personal necessity of the Directors on the ground that they are Non Resident Indians and they require the demised premises for commencing their own business. The Rent Controller, Chandigarh, vide his order dated 15.9.2010 (Annexure P1), has rightly held that as to whether the need of the directors can be separated from the company or not, is a triable issue. Needless to say as to what is the balance sheet of the company, as to how the directors are doing in their day-to-day affairs and the other Civil Revision No. 7133 of 2010 2 facts, are dependent upon leading of the evidence by the parties. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to cause interference. At this stage, Mr. H.S. Bhullar, Advocate, appearing for the petitioners, submits that he will not press the present revision petition in case the Rent Controller is directed to decide the eviction petition within a stipulated period. Learned counsel for the caveator/respondent has no objection thereto. Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, is directed to decide the eviction petition, within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge November 1, 2010 “DK”