IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.29333 of 2008 RANJEET KUMAR PATEL @ RANJEET PATEL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 22.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The case is under Section 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleged that the petitioner was travelling on a tempo and four other persons were also in the vehicle. The vehicle stopped and the driver said that it will not go further. The informant got down from the vehicle and he found that he had been pick pocketed of Rs.10,000/-. The informant came to the tempo stand and searched those four persons, who were in the tempo and it is said that the petitioner was found there and on search Rs.6060/- of the stolen money was recovered from his possession. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated on suspicion only. In the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence prayer for bail is refused. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after completion of one year of incarceration. Kundan (C. M. Prasad, J.)