IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2010 / 30TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 32416 of 2010(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- 1. ANISH MANOHAR, "KRISHNA SREE", KADALUNDI, KOZHIKODE. 2. RENJITH R., PARAMESHWAR, KAILASAM, SHANTIGIRI, OPP:WOOD MILC, HMT P.O., ALUVA. 3. ABHEESH T., "KRISHNA SREE", KADALUNDI, KOZHIKODE. 4. VARKEY PAUL, MALIAKAL HOUSE, KUZHUPILLY, AYYAMPILLY P.O. 5. SARATH S., "KARTHIKA", ADINADU SOUTH, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.ANIL RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHANCELLOR, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/10/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 32416 OF 2010 (B) ===================== Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the results were declared, 1st petitioner failed in the paper Industrial Electronics and Application of VIth Semester, 2nd petitioner failed in Signals and Systems of 4th Semester, 3rd petitioner failed in System Design with Micro Controllers and Object Oriented Programming of 7th semester, 4th petitioner failed in Engineering Mathematics of 1st and 2nd Semesters and the 5th petitioner failed in Digital Signal Processing of 6th Semester and Electrical Machines of 4th Semester. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation WPC No. 32416/10 :2 : have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp