IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.882 of 2007 BASHISHTHA NARAIN TIWARY, S/O- LATE BANS ROPAN TIWAZRY, R/O- VILLAGE - AAMI, P.S. DIGHAWARA, P.O. AAMI, DISTRICT - SARAN Versus 1. BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THROUGH THE CHAIRMAN, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 2. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 3. THE ELECTRICITY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CHAPRA ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, CHAPRA. 4. ELECTRIC SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, CHAPRA, SUPPLY DIVISION, CHAPRA 5. THE ELECTRICITY SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, MUZAFFARPUR ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR. ----------- 3. 05.05.2009 Heard. A counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of the Board. However, no supplementary counter affidavit has been filed pursuant to the order dated 04.04.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from the counter affidavit filed by the Board it appears that the payment has been made as indicated in the paragraph -9 of the counter affidavit. However, it further appears that the payment of gratuity and final fixation of pension is not sanctioned on account of alleged pendency of the departmental proceedings. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has specifically stated in paragraph – 12 of - 2 - the writ petition that neither any departmental proceeding initiated against this petitioner nor any chargesheet was ever served against the petitioner. In the above circumstances, petitioner is permitted to make representation before the respondent no. 4 with regard to the grievances which has not been redressed as yet. In case such representation is filed within a period of four weeks alongwith certified copy of the present order, respondent no. 4 shall consider and dispose of the same by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)