1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1356 OF 2002 IN WRIT PETITION NO.873 OF 1991 Shri Hasan Y. Hussain .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.Parikh with Ms.Pramila Shah for applicant. CORAM : A.P.SHAH AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2004. P.C. 1. Heard Advocates. C.A. is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). Interim orders to continue. C.A. disposed of accordingly. ***** 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2071 OF 2002 IN WRIT PETITION NO.879 OF 1991 Ramesh T. Gujar .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.Parikh with Ms.Pramila Shah for applicant. CORAM : A.P.SHAH AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2004. P.C. 1. Heard Advocates. C.A. is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). Interim orders to continue. C.A. disposed of accordingly. ***** 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1363 OF 2002 IN WRIT PETITION NO.882 OF 1991 Abdul H. Rehman .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.Parikh with Ms.Pramila Shah for applicant. CORAM : A.P.SHAH AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 4TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 4TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 4TH OCTOBER 2004. P.C. 1. Heard Advocates. C.A. is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). Interim orders to continue. C.A. disposed of accordingly. ***** 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1374 OF 2002 IN WRIT PETITION NO.899 OF 1991 Gulam H. Abdul Hussain .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.Parikh with Ms.Pramila Shah for applicant. CORAM : A.P.SHAH AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2004. P.C. 1. Heard Advocates. C.A. is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). Interim orders to continue. C.A. disposed of accordingly. ***** 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1371 OF 2002 IN WRIT PETITION NO.892 OF 1991 Abdul Ibrahim Theba .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.Parikh with Ms.Pramila Shah for applicant. CORAM : A.P.SHAH AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2004. P.C. 1. Heard Advocates. C.A. is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). Interim orders to 6 continue. C.A. disposed of accordingly. ***** IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1358 OF 2002 IN WRIT PETITION NO.875 OF 1991 Shri H.H.Shrihari Vishwakarma .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.Parikh with Ms.Pramila Shah for applicant. CORAM : A.P.SHAH AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2004. P.C. 1. Heard Advocates. C.A. is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). Interim orders to 7 continue. C.A. disposed of accordingly. *****