HIGH COURT G? CHHATTI$GARH: B§LAS§3UR Writ ?et§iion N0, 156 of 2G$2 Peiitioners ’i) fat§bha Yadav, Wio. Shri Manoj, Aged about 33 years, Occupaiion- Guru§i at E.G.$. Canker Tuisighat Bucihwaafa, Lormi, Biiaspur. 2) Santosh Yaeiav. W/o. Shri Duyga Yadav, Aged absut 28 ,'&ar$, C‘ccupa‘tian —- Guruji at EGS Cenier v Sicidhmunipara, Rio. Taisighai, Lermi‘ Disi. Eiiaspui. 3} Chakievi Nawang, W/o. Shri Tamradhwag Navmng, Gccupatbnu Guruji ai EGS Ceni'er Saianawapafa, R/o. Saianawapara, Bigha Kanpa, Lcrmi, Biiaspur. Vers us Restvamknts 1) grate of Chhattisgam. through $ecretary, Bepmimamt a? Panchayat. Mantraiaya, Sha§§i Showk, Raipw. 2} Chief Executive Officer! Janpad Panch ya: LemL Tahsi! Lermi, Biiaspw. (Writ Petition Lmder Articie 226/227 of the Coasti‘cutioa of india) SB: Hon’bie Shri Jus%ice Satish K. Agnéhotri Present Shri Vinay Pandey, counseé for the petitiener. S'mi Arvind Dubey, Panei Lawyer for resporidenis No.1 &2/S’:ate. GRAL cages; (Passed ea 2?“ Aprgg, 2097) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the peiitionerS seeks permiesion of ihis Court to withdiaw this petition as this petitiori has become infmc‘cuous, to which the teamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents has no obgection. 2. it is ordered accordingiy. 3. The petition is dismissed as having iaecome infractuoue. No cider as to Costs. Sd/- i I Satish K. Agnjhotrir i r ‘i 1 Judge Raju