IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12628 of 2010 ANIRUDH MANDAL SON OF LATE RAM PRASAD MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE + P.O. – TARAIYA, P.S. –SAHARGHAT, DISTRICT - MADHUBANI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CO- OPERATIVE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE COLLECTOR, DARBHANGA. 4. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BIRAUL. 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, GAURA BAURAM. 6. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. ----------- 02. 11.08.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 30th of September 2009 from the post of Assistant while working in the office of respondent no. 5, the payment of the retiral dues including the pension has not been settled as yet. It is submitted that Accountant General as per letter as contained in Memo No. 1211 dated 28th of January 2010 has requested the respondent no. 5 to send the governmental decision with regard to the absorption of the PACS Manager including with respect to service prior to the absorption in the government 2 service as also the service book. Respondent no. 5 despite receiving the above communication from the Accountant General has not sent back the same although there is already a governmental decision as contained in Memo no. 12 dated 05.01.2004 as also memo no. 1235 dated 26.02.2004 vide Annexures- 4 and 4/1 respectively. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claims of the petitioner as made out in the writ application would be considered as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has earlier filed a representation, however, for expeditious disposal of the above claims in light of the letter in question written by the Accountant General, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 5 with a copy to respondent nos. 3 and 6. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law 3 expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues, if any, could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)