1 BA 342-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.342 OF 2011 1. Poonam Balbhim Suryawanshi ..Applicants 2. Muktabai Ravan Dhanerao V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.Kuldeep S. Patil, Advocate, for the Applicants Mrs.Geeta P. Mulekar, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 25TH MARCH, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for bail by two women, who are arrested in connection with C.R.No.212 of 2010 for the offence punishable under Sections 385, 392 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Kharghar Police Station, Taluka Panvel and who obtained a lift from the first informant and 2 BA 342-2011 then the first informant was forced to part with a sum of Rs.37,000/- by two constables, who accosted the first informant with the two applicants. The constables have been admitted to bail. Application for bail by the two applicants was rejected by the Sessions Court observing that if they are released on bail they may commit similar offence and it would be difficult to procure their presence during the trial. This could be taken care of by imposing certain conditions on them. 3. In view of this, applicants be released on bail on their furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs.30,000/- each with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.30,000/- on the condition that they shall attend Kharghar Police Station, Taluka Panvel Police Station on every Sunday & Wednesday between 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. for the next two months and thereafter, if charge sheet is filed, on every first Sunday of the month till 3 BA 342-2011 the trial is over. 4. Criminal Application is disposed of. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)