IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28634 of 2009 GOVIND KUMAR, Son of Late Nathu sah, resident of Sahawajpur, Dullah Muradpur, P.S.Ahiapur, District- Muzaffarpur.....Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar.................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 14.9.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that some persons at the point of pistol snatched Rs. 3,000/- and several articles from the informant. The petitioner was apprehended in another case, namely, Karza P.S. Case No. 138 of 2008 and some arms were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as far as this case is concerned, no recovery was made of the looted articles and T. I. Parade has been held after 2 ½ months which according to the counsel for the petitioner is after much delay. However, considering that the petitioner has been identified by two persons, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. The bail application of the petitioner is rejected. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)