IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 16TH BHADRA 1933 CRP.No. 403 of 2011() --------------------- OS.3/2011 of WAKF TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE .................... REVN. PETITIONERS(DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 5): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PERANDACHERI KUNHABDULLA, TEACHER, S/O.LATE AMMED AGED 57 YEARS, VILLIAPILLI AMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. PUTHALATH IBRAHIM @ UMBAI, S/O.KUTTIALI, CLERK AGED 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT VILLIAPILLI AMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. T.K.ABDUL AZEEZ @ KAPPI AZEEZ, S/O.KUNHABDULLA HAJI AGED 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT KAPPINATAVIDA HOUSE, VILLIAPILLI AMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 4. MANGAT KUNHIMOOSA, S/O.AMMED, AGED 40 YEARS BUSINESS, RESIDING AT VILLIAPILLI AMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 5. PUTHAN PURAYIL ASHRAF, S/O.MOIDU, AGED 35 YEARS, BUSINESS RESIDING AT VILLIAPILLI AMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS RESPONDENTS/(PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF & 6TH DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT): --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. KUNNOTH MAMMU HAJI, S/O.KUNHI ABDULLA, AGED 78 YEARS MUTHAVALLI AND CHAIRMAN OF KUNNOTH THAZE MASJID, VILLIAPILLI AMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KERALA WAKF BOARD, KALOOR ROAD ERNAKULAM - 682 017 THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS JJ., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C.R.P. No.403 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 7th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph J., This Revision petition is filed against the order of granting injunction in favour of the first respondent. 2. We heard learned counsel for the revision petitioners. 3. Having regard to the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner, we are not interfering with the order, as such. We dispose of the C.R.P. by directing that the Wakf Tribunal will dispose of the suit itself, untrammelled by any of the observations contained in the order. K.M.JOSEPH, (JUDGE) M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, (JUDGE) dl/