IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2) (b) Description of the case Writ Petition No. 288 of 2004 (S/B) Date of decision: 17 th September, 2004. For the approval of: Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.S. Sirpurkar Hon’ble Mr. Justice Irshad Hussain - Whether the order/judgment should be sent to the reporters for reporting? () - Whether the reporters be allowed to see the Judgment? ( Yes) A IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. Writ Petition No. 288 (S/B) of 2004 Vimal Bahuguna. ……….. Petitioners. Versus Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. And another …….. Respondents. ………….. Sri N.C. Gupta, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. D.C. Pant, leaned counsel for the respondents. Coram: Hon. V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J. Hon. Irshad Hussain, J. Dated: September 17, 2004 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The only prayer in this petition is for expeditious disposal of the appeal as provided under Rule 37 of sub-Rule III of General Insurance Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1975, applicable to the petitioner who was working as Development Officer in the Oriental Insurance Company. Notice is issued, which is accepted by Sri D.S. Patni, leaned counsel for the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. He fairly agrees to get the appeal decided within three months from today. There shall be a direction, therefore, that the appeal shall be disposed of by the concerned authority within three months from today. If appeal is not disposed of within that period, the departmental proceedings against the petitioner shall be treated to be null and void without further reference to this Court. The petition is dismissed accordingly. (Irshad Hussain, J.) (V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J.) 17.9.2004 17.09.2004 A