IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9523 of 2011 1. SUNIL SINGH SON OF SRI TARKESHWAR SINGH. 2. PANKAJ SINGH SON OF SRI RAMKESHWAR SINGH. 3. NAGESHWAR SINGH SON OF LATE AMBIKA SINGH. -------------- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 380 and 376/511 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Harizan Atrocities Act. It is alleged in the complaint that Sunil Singh tried to establish physical relationship, but it appears that in reply to the court question during S.A., the complainant had said that the forceful physical relationship was established by Sunil Singh. Furthermore, the complainant in her S.A., has also admitted that 15 days prior to the occurrence, there was some scuffle between the parties. The complainant’s attempt to improve the allegation in her S.A., makes her accusation, in complaint, doubtful. Hence, the accusation made in the complaint does not inspire confidence. 2 Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Complaint Case No. 538C/2006, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Any opinion recorded in the present order is confined for the bail purposes only. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)