17 $ing§§gr $em€r§ 1N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (cm w.P. (S) No. WI 99 /201 1 / f. PETITIONER : Narendra Kumar Kumre s/o Late Ramdhur 'Kumre aged about 31 years R/o. Keshkal Borgaon Distt. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS (fr, State of Chhattisgarh, through its I r f Secretary, Health and family Welfare n W }” ‘ f * — Department, Raipur, (C.G‘.) D.K.S. Bhawan, j 9 (2) 'K Chief Medical And Helth ofticer office V‘ a V3 v‘ ‘6‘ ..«’ of Chief Medical and Health officer Bastar, Jagdalpur (C.G.) My (3) Medical officer, R.N.T. Hospital Kondagaon, Bastar (C.G.) e/w (4) Shri Anand Kumar Swi S/o Shri Gopal Singh Aged about 35 years, R/ o Shiv Mandir Ward, Jagdalpur, Distt. Jagdalpur (CG) f} \ / 06 WW) A, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA o XI-HC 78 ,W m.£.‘c$.2.wl:{a.-.:2,97mg/n oo mm (Wu) WWW ammm mmw‘gém $aimm SE : Han’ble Shri Manindrai Mohan Shrivastava, J. 12. 12.2%1 1 Shri’P.S. Koshy, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, DJ Advocate Ger1eral for the State/ respondents 1 t0 3 on advance capy. The petitioner has aporoached this Court aggrieved by the order of cancellation o£ his a pointment. counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that earlier, writ petition was filed before the Court challenging process of appo‘ tment through which the petitioners, were selected and appointe and that writ petition was allowed and writ appeal was also d sed. He however submits that in those matters, the petitione s were not impleaded as party and they had no notice and kno edge. Therefore, the petitioners have now approached this Court y filing this petition challenging the order of cancellation of ap ointment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that du ’ g the pendency of the writ petition, orders of appointment were issued on 16/ 11/2010, which faet was not brought to the notic of the concerned Court by any of the parties. He further submits that this fact was not brought to the x lmowledge of the appellate C uit also. WWW - ’ I At the outset, learn / i ‘s XI-HC»—7 8 g} WWW ammwia? mm (WE) mm‘g‘d em '2 mm f3€kWn $afmm Praveen I am afraid, this Cohrt cannot come to any aid of the petitioner VThe grounds Wh inquired, it is informed that the petitioner has not filed any review petition before the Writ Court or even in the writ appellate Court. Leaving the petitioner} to avail such remedy as may be available under the law, this Sd/— Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ch have been raised by the petitioner u cannot belallowed to be rai d in a separate petition. Upon being petition is disposed of. 3a W, W35,W