THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1230 OF 2010 DATED: 08.03.2011 Between: M.N.Venkatesu. .... PETITIONER And Kandanuru Seshacharyulu (died) & 9 others. .... RESPONDENTS ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 09.02.2010, in C.M.A.No.4 of 2008 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Punganur, wherein the said appeal filed by the respondents 2 to 4 herein, was allowed setting aside the order, dated 28.02.2008, in I.A.No.418 of 2006 in O.S.No.84 of 2006 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Punganur in respect of the items 2 to 30 of the schedule properties and dismissing the appeal in respect of the item No.1 of the schedule property. 2. Heard both sides. Perused the record. 3. Petitioner herein filed the suit for permanent injunction against the respondents 1 to 10 in respect of 30 items of the plaint schedule situate in Peddayellakuntla, Chowdepalle mandal, Punganur. He also filed I.A.No.418 of 2006 for temporary injunction pending disposal of the suit. Respondents filed counter opposing the said application. The trial Court by order, dated 28.02.2008, allowed the said petition and granted temporary injunction in respect of the plaint schedule properties, restraining the respondents 1 to 10 from interfering with the petitioner’s possession and enjoyment of the same. Aggrieved by the said order, defendants 2 to 4 filed C.M.A.No.4 of 2008. The learned Senior Civil Judge, Punganur by the impugned order, dated 19.02.2010, allowed the said appeal in part setting aside the order of injunction in respect of items 2 to 30 of the schedule and confirming the order of injunction passed by the trial Court in respect of item No.1. Hence, the present Civil Revision Petition. 4. While admitting the Civil Revision Petition, this Court by interim order, dated 19.03.2010, directed that there shall be interim injunction as prayed for. It is to be noted that the suit itself is one for injunction and the questions, which arise for consideration in the present Civil Revision Petition, have to be necessarily determined by the trial Court on evidence during the course of trial. Having regard to the fact that the suit is of the year, 2006 and there has been injunction in favour of the plaintiff in respect of certain items of the property and the plaintiff’s claim for a temporary injunction in respect of the other items is negatived, it is considered that the ends of justice would be met by directing the trial Court to dispose of the suit at an early date, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and further directing that both parties shall maintain status quo obtaining as on today till the disposal of the suit. It is open to the parties to raise all such contentions, which are permissible under law, before the trial Court. 5. Accordingly, Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with the above direction. Interim order granted on 19.03.2010 stands vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 08th March, 2011. Tsy