f«^ ,^^ v HfSMCOURTOF CHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR W.P.rcnNo. 607 of 2008 PeWoner Pramod Kumar Agrawal, aged about 44 years, S/o Lato tehwar Prasad Agawal, R/o Pramod Msdtebs, Ward No.2 Amkherwan _ Tahsil Manendragarh Distt. Korea C.G. Versus Respondents 1. The State of ChhatU^iarh, through Secr^ary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, RaipurC.G. 2. Collector, Ustt. Korea, C.G. 3. Sub Divisional Ofltoer (Revenue), Manendragarh Distt.KoreaC.G. 4. Tahsildar, Manendre^arh Distt. KorsaC.G. WRITPETITOINUNDERARTIGLE22eAND 227 OF THEeONSTiTUTIONOFINDIA Single Bench :Hon'bteMr. Satish K. Agnihotri.J. Shri Parag KoteGha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ravindra Agarwal, Advocate forthe responctents. ^r; J^ ORALORDER (Passed on this 8"' day of February, 2008) Leamed counsel appearing for the petiSoner submte that the Tahsilctar, Manendragarh, District - Korea has intGated encroaGhmerrt proceedings in respect of the land bearing Khasra No. 438/3, area 0.037 dism)l/0.015 hectare.sttuated at Viilage - Manendragarh.Heftirthersubmits <hat the sakl land is recorded in the name of the petiUoner and Bie proceedlngs for grant <rf We is pending before Ure Collector and Sub Divisional Officer. In this peUtion the reliefhas been sougM to quash the said pr<weedings in Revenus Case Np. 111/A-68CCX)5-06, pending before ttie Tahsildar, ManendrE^arh. Thakur ^K- tn view of the judicial proceedings pending before the TahsiMar, at ttiis stage, it is not proper and justified to quash the sald proceedings. Ifthe petitioner tas anything tosay on merite,the petitioner has verywell opporhinltyto make submissions before the auttiority concsrned, where the rwenue proceedings is pending eonsideration. This Court is offfie opinion that it fe not a ease where this Court shoukt exereise its extra ordinary jurisdiction to interfere with the judidal proceedings pending before the Tahsildar. In view of the foregoing, ttis petiBon is devoid of merit and is dismissed, summarily. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom 1 Judge m