IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17917 of 2010 JITENDRA KUMAR @ RAJESH RANJAN, S/o Bhola Prasad. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 29.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 364 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 06.01.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 41295 of 2009 also on consideration of the statement of one Sunil Singh recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail on the ground that the statement of Sunil Singh does not contain any incriminating material against the petitioner. The same has been filed as Annexure-6 vide supplementary-affidavit and from perusal of the same I am convinced that the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. of Sunil Singh does not contain incriminating material against the petitioner. However on perusal of the case diary, I find that there is ample material against the petitioner of having been involved in the present occurrence of kidnapping of 2 the driver and killing him for purposes of loot of the Bolero Jeep in question. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is once again rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it in view of the serious nature of the offence. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)