IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.1613/2011 Decided on: 19.8.2011 _____________________________________________ Sohan Singh Kaushal. …Petitioner. Versus H.P. State Financial Corporation Limited. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate. _____________________________________________________ Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. Suneet Goel submits that his client is ready and willing to repay the amount, if by way of indulgence, his case for one time settlement, is considered. Petitioner has already been given number of opportunities to repay the loan amount. However, in the interest of justice, petitioner is permitted to make a representation for one time settlement with the respondent-corporation, within a period of four weeks from today. Thereafter, the same shall be considered by the respondent-corporation by taking a sympathetic 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 view within a period of three weeks. Respondent- corporation shall pass a speaking and detailed order. 2. In the light of above, the present writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 19.8.2011 *awasthi*