IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 22837 of 2001 Between: N. Maheswari W/o N.Laxmi Reddy R/o H.No.3-4-508, Barkatpura, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector Hyderabad, Hyderabad Dist. 2 The Deputy Tahsildar S.B.H., Zonal Office Kachiguda, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to isue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction and declared the impugned Distraint Order dt:29.10.2001 issued by the 2nd Respondent herein Under Standing Order No.41 Paragraph 25 Forms Under A.P.Revenue Recovery Act II 1864 as arbitrary, illegal, void and abinitio for the reason not giving and demand notice or sufficient time and apportunity for payment of money before issuing the Distraint order consquently quash the impugned order dt:29.10.2001 in the interest of justice and equity and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:None appeared Counsel for the Respondents: Mr.P. Balaram. The Court made the following : ORDER: When the matter was called on 28.03.2008, none appeared and therefore, it was posted to 04.04.2008 under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today also none appeared. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:04.04.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RAGHU}