1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.2869 OF 2009 Subhash Shankar Kembari, .. Applicant Vs State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. U.R.Agandsurve, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. S.S.Pednekar, APP, for the Respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 02/07/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No. I-117 of 2008 Murbad Police Station. The said crime has been registered against the applicant and ten others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 302, 363, 201, 120(B), 147,148,149 of IPC. 3. I perused the statement of the complainant. The complainant is an eye-witness. He has stated in detail as to how the accused persons assaulted the deceased. He has named the T 2 applicant and other accused and has stated that they all assaulted Bhaskar Chandane with sharp edged weapons in their hands. Even the other eye-witnesses, though have not named the accused persons, have narrated the incident, which support the statement of the complainant. The medical evidence is also consistent with the statement of the complainant. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Hence, the application is rejected. While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)