C.W.P. No. 14160 of 2010 [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 14160 of 2010 Date of Decision: July 8,2011 Krishan .................................................... Petitioner Versus The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Panipat and another .............................. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. D.S.Nalwa, Addl. A.G. Haryana. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Counsel for the State has referred to the provisions of Section 10(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act which are reproduced hereunder:- (4) Where in an order referring an industrial dispute to [a Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal] under this Section or in a subsequent order, the appropriate Government has specified the points of dispute for adjudication, [the Labour C.W.P. No. 14160 of 2010 [ 2 ] Court or the Tribunal or the National Tribunal, as the case may be,] shall confine its adjudication to those points and matters incidental thereto.]” Once the matter has been referred to the Labour Court it is to confine its adjudication to the points which have been referred. As per Section 10(1) it is the Government who forms an opinion on the claim made by the workman and after it is satisfied the matter is referred to the Labour Court. The order dated 24.9.2008 does not suffer from any illegality. The writ petition is dismissed. 8.7.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE