HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH C.R.P.No.3886 of 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order of the learned District Judge, Guntur, dated 29.03.2011 dismissing I.A.No.192 of 2011 in an unnumbered A.S. of 2011 filed by the 2nd defendant in O.S.No.302 of 2005, who is the revision petitioner herein. The respondent herein filed O.S.No.302 of 2005 against the petitioner herein and 4 other defendants for specific performance of the agreement of sale dated 31.10.2004. The petitioner herein and 4 other defendants contested the said suit. The trial Court, by judgment dated 26.04.2010, partly decreed the said suit directing defendants 2 and 4 to execute the registered sale deed in favour of the plaintiff in respect of their joint undivided share in the suit schedule property by receiving balance sale consideration of Rs.1,00,000/- from the plaintiff, who is directed to deposit the said amount within two months from that day. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner-2nd defendant and defendant No.4 filed an appeal before the Court of the District Judge, Guntur, and as there was delay of 201 days in filing the said appeal, the petitioner- 2nd defendant alone filed the present I.A.No.192 of 2011 seeking to condone the said delay. The trial Court, on a consideration of the entire material available on record, held that there is no sufficient cause to condone the said delay and accordingly dismissed the application. Questioning the said order, the present revision is filed by the 2nd defendant. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Counsel for the respondents and perused the material available on record. In the affidavit filed in support of the application, it is stated that since the father of the petitioner-2nd defendant fell sick due to old age and since the petitioner-2nd defendant and his brother i.e., 4th defendant are residing at different places for their livelihood, they are unable to prefer the appeal in time and as such the said delay has occurred. The averments made in the affidavit on the fact of it are not acceptable. Though the petitioner-2nd defendant contended that his father was sick due to old age, no material is produced in support of the said contention. Further, the present application seeking to condone the delay in preferring the appeal is filed by one of the appellants alone i.e., the petitioner-2nd defendant. There is no sufficient cause to condone the delay. Therefore, this Court does not find any ground to interfere with the order of the trial Court, which has given cogent and convincing reasons for dismissing the present application, filed by the petitioner herein. The impugned order does not suffer from any material irregularity or illegality. I find no merit in this revision and the Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________________ JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH 04.11.2011 Gsn.