Crl. Misc. No. M-37368 of 2010 -: 2 :- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-37368 of 2010 Date of decision: March 08, 2011. Parvez ...Petitioner v. State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Shri S.S. Dinarpur, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri H.S. Deol, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Shri Diwan S.Adalkha, Advocate for the complainant. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia , J. (Oral): Present petition has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of pre-arrest bail in case FIR No.440 dated 29.10.2010 registered at Police Station City Jagadhari, under Sections 498-A, 406, 506 IPC. A Coordinate Bench of this Court on 29.12.2010 had passed the following order:- “The marriage of Yasmeen (complainant) was performed with the petitioner-Parvez on 21.09.2003 according to Muslim rites and ceremonies. The parents of the complainant spent Rs.10 lacs and gave sufficient dowry including gold jewellery, silver jewellery, house-hold articles, etc. as per list attached with the complaint. However, it is alleged that the accused demanded a car and Rs.5 lacs for running the business. The complainant showed her inability to fulfil the demand. As such she was beaten and taunted. It is alleged by the complainant that her husband (petitioner) tried to kill her by burning her on 28.05.2010. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the Crl. Misc. No. M-37368 of 2010 -: 2 :- marriage was performed on 21.09.2003 and the FIR has been registered after 10 years on 29.10.2010. Besides, it is submitted that the petitioner is ready to join investigation. Notice of motion for 08.02.2011. In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be admitted to interim bail on his furnishing personal bond and surety to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall join investigation as and when called and shall abide by the conditions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. “ Today, Counsel for the complainant has stated that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties and petitioner-husband has agreed to rehabilitate the complainant-wife Yasmeen. Counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Kanwar Pal, PS City Jagadhari, has also confirmed factum of compromise. In view of this, pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioner is affirmed till filing of the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. Thereafter the petitioner shall be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court. Disposed of. [Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia] March 08, 2011. Judge kadyan