1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2766 OF 1999 Lady Constable Sharmila Khedekar ..... Petitioner. V/s Deputy Inspector General (Western Zone) and Ors. ....... Respondents. ----- Mr. P.V. Nichani i/b M/s. P.V. Nichani & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Charan alongwith Mrs. Rutuja Ambekar & Vinod Joshi i/b Mr. T.C. Kaushik for the Union of India. --------- CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND V.M.KANADE, J. DATE : 9TH JUNE, 2008. P.C.: 1. During the course of arguments, it is commonly conceded before us that the order of dismissal of the Petitioner from service was set aside by the appellate authority and the order for reduction in pay- scale was passed in lieu thereof. It is further stated by the learned Counsel appearing for respective parties, upon instructions from their clients, that this Writ Petition could be disposed of by consented order. The agreed terms are as under:- (a) The Petitioner will be permitted to join the service in the reduced pay-scale forthwith. The Petitioner may join the duty on 11th June, 2008 at 11.00 a.m. She will be permitted to 2 join her duty and work as per rules. (b) The Petitioner shall make a representation for payment of back-wages and for waiver/reduction of damages claimed by the respondents for use and occupation of the government quarters. The representation shall be moved to the same authority where she will join. (c) This representation, if moved within one week from today, shall be decided by the respondents after hearing the Petitioner within three weeks thereafter. (d) The Petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the order so passed on the representation in accordance with law if the order is adverse to the interest of the Petitioner. 2. Since the agreed terms, otherwise, are just, fair and equitable, we dispose of the Writ Petition in terms of the agreed terms which shall be treated as order of the Court. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE 3 V.M. KANADE, J.