1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 777 OF 2009 Kishor Eknathrao Kulkarni .. .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra and others .. .. Respondents Shri C. R. Bharaswadkar, Advocate h/f Shri A. S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri K. G. Patil, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 3. Shri V. V. Bhavthankar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. CORAM : B. R. GAVAI, AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 31ST AUGUST, 2009. ORAL ORDER [ Per B. R. Gavail, J. ] : 1. The limited relief claimed in the present petition is for issuance of directions to the respondent No. 2 and 3 to publish list of selected candidates from project affected persons category. 2. It appears that, list is not published in view of pendency of issue regarding appointment of project affected persons category before the Full Bench of this Court. 2 3. The controversy is not said to rest by the Full Bench vide its judgment in the case of Rajendra Pandurang Pagare and others Vs. State of Maharashtra and others reported in 2009 (4) Mh. L. J. 961. In that view of the matter, we find that petition can be disposed of by directing the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to publish list of selected candidates selected from project affected persons category within a period of four weeks from today. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ B. R. GAVAI, J.] bsb/August 09