IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18558 of 2010 1. TUNTUN SAH, SON OF BHOLA SAH 2. BINDA DEVI, WIFE OF BHOLA SAH 3. BHOLA SAH, SON OFMATHURA SAH 4. GULAB SAH, SON OF GUNJESHWAR SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE THEYWA, P.S. GOPALPUR, DISTT. GOPALGANJ. ------- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. LAL BABU PRASAD, SON OF NATHUNI PRASAD, R/O VILLAGE RAMJITA, P.S. KUCHAIKOT, DISTT. GOPALGANJ. ------- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 3. 03.02.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 10.8.2009 passed in Sessions Trial No. 72 of 1991 by which the application under Section 311 Cr. P.C. has been refused by the trial court. On perusing the order impugned, I find that the said witnesses were examined between 1992-94 whereas the application was filed on 6.6.2009 for recall of the three witnesses. In vies of such, I see no reason to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)