Criminal Misc.-M No. 21681 of 2011 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 21681 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 12.10.2011 Prem Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Aminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Bajwa, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. …. RAJESH BINDAL, J. While issuing notice of motion on 20.07.2011, following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner were noticed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He was an eye-witness to one agreement to sell executed by Darwara Singh in favour of Sukhdev Singh. Allegations in the present FIR are that on the date when the agreement of sell was executed, Darwara Singh was not owner of the land to the extent it was agreed to be sold. It has come on record that in the Jamabandis, Darwara Singh was shown to be owner of the land. Earlier sale of land in favour of Sukhdev Singh on 25.7.1990 was never reflected in the Jamabandis as mutation on the basis thereof was not sanctioned.” Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation. Criminal Misc.-M No. 21681 of 2011 2 Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Budh Singh, submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions made above, interim bail granted to the petitioner on 20.07.2011, is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 12.10.2011 sharmila