1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4473 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 601 OF 2009. Tara Joseph Narona, through Chandrahas Narayan Joglekar. ..Applicant. v/s. Shri Wilfred J. Parera & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr. Rajesh B. Parab, for Applicant. Ms. Neeta Karnik, for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. .... CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 10TH DECEMBER 2009. P.C. Heard. The learned Advocate appearing for the applicant has no objection to grant of prayer clause (a), which reads as follows :- “(a) That the office be directed to handover the original Will of Besibai lying in the record of Trial Court to the applicant.” 2. Civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The learned Counsel appearing for the applicant prays for stay of the proceedings. We find that in paragraph 5 of the civil 2 application, it is stated that the stay may be granted in the alternative to grant prayer clause (a). Since we have granted prayer clause (a), stay is rejected. Civil application stands disposed of. [S.A. BOBDE, J.] [ S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ]