1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4662 OF 2009 (Ku. Seema d/o late Atmamanohar Walde vs. Nagpur Municipal Corporation) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND F.M.REIS, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 18, 2009 Heard Shri Shukla, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Puranik, learned Counsel for the respondent. Shri Shukla, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that claim of petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground was considered by the respondent Nagpur Municipal Corporation in the year 2004 and resolution dated 4.2.2004 was passed wherein name of the petitioner along with other candidates was mentioned to be considered for appointment on compassionate ground. However, till this date, the petitioner has not 2 received any order of appointment. The learned Counsel for the petitioner prays that liberty to submit a representation to the respondent in this regard may kindly be granted and direction may be issued to the respondent to decide the same within a stipulated period. Shri Puranik, learned Counsel for the respondent, states that if petitioner makes a representation, same would be considered as per directions of this Court. In the circumstances, we dispose of the petition with direction to the respondent to decide the representation of the petitioner, if submitted by the petitioner within two weeks from today, on its own merits and in accordance with law as early as possible and in any case, not beyond the period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. JUDGE JUDGE khj 3