HON'BLE SHRI G.S.SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 646 OF 2006 Between: Govind Upadhyay & others ..... Petitioners AND The Government of India, Ministry of Urban Development & Poverty & Deviation Department of Urban Development & Poverty Alleviation, New Delhi Rep. by its Secretary & others .....Respondents :: O R D E R :: Counsel for the petitioners : Shri T. Sudhakar Reddy Counsel for the respondent No.2 : Special Government Pleader Dated: 05.01.2007 Per G.S.SINGHVI, CJ In this petition, the petitioners have made the following substantive prayer: “ It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to the respondents to consider the scheme of rehabilitation of the petitioners place with a further direction to the respondents not to resort to any coercive steps of evicting the petitioners from the place of their business till the scheme of their rehabilitation is finalized by the respondents, while setting aside notices issued by Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad to the petitioners dated 03.01.2006, declaring the action of the respondents as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of principles of natural justice or otherwise the petitioners would be put to irreparable and irretrievable loss and injury of loosing their livelihood.” Shri T. Sudhakar Reddy says that in view of the interim orders passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.20228 of 2005, all the petitioners have been allotted alternative sites and they have shifted from the present places of their business. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition as infructuous, W.P.M.P.No. 775 of 2006 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is also disposed of as infructuous. G.S.SINGHVI, CJ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 05.01.2007 ksld