BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fifteenth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14069 of 2011 1 P. VIJAYAKUMAR 2 M. REEGAN JOSE 3 M. SUBBURAJ 4 V.ILLAYARAJ 5 PECHIMUTHU 6 ALLIRAJ ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.2 to 7 Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE COURTRALAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CR NO. 778/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.MUTHALRAJ Advocate For Respondent : M/S.C.RAMESH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as A2 to A7 and they prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 365, 506(ii) and 511 I.P.C. in Crime No.778 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2. Heard Mr.S.Muthalraj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal Side0 appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit in his argument that the petitioners have no previous case. He would further submit in his argument that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see that the petitioners have no previous case and no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Senkottai, Tirunelveli District and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Senkottai, Tirunelveli District and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 15/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SENKOTTAI, TIRUNELVELI DIST 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE COURTRALAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI +1. CC to M/S. S.MUTHALRAJ Advocate SR.No.39708 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14069 of 2011 Date :15/11/2011 SMA/17.11.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/