1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 663 OF 2009 Datamatics Global Services Limited ...Petitioner. Vs. R.Steinmetz & Sons (India) Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent. Mr. Anil Menon i/by M/s. Anil Menon & Associates for the Petitioner. Mr. Dinyar Madon, Sr. Counsel a/w Mr. Pradeep Bakhru i/by Mr. J. Sagar Associates for the Respondent. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 25th SEPTEMBER, 2009. P.C.- 1 There arose dispute between the parties based upon the MOU. Therefore, the petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Act) has been filed but now arrived at settlement and accordingly filed the consent terms/Minutes of the Consent order, signed by all the parties, including their respective advocates. The same is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. There is no dispute about the authorization, as well as, identification of the person. The 2 statement is also made that the consent terms are well within the framework of law and the record. There is no third party involved or affected by this consent terms. 2 The petition is disposed of in view of this consent terms/minutes of consent order with liberty. No costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)