:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4303 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.4303 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.4303 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L) NO.772 OF 2006 (L) NO.772 OF 2006 (L) NO.772 OF 2006 IN IN IN ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.42 OF 2005 PETITION NO.42 OF 2005 PETITION NO.42 OF 2005 Union of India through General Manager, Central Railway ..Appellant Vs. Rajesh Agrawal ..Respondent Mr.T.J.Pandian for the Appellant. Mr.Uday Sankar Samudrala for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 19TH NOVEMBER,2007 : 19TH NOVEMBER,2007 : 19TH NOVEMBER,2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the Notice of Motion and affidavit-in-support thereof. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 93 days delay in filing the above Appeal. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay in filing the above Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)