IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 8828 of 2008. Decided on 7th December, 2010. Kishan Singh. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No. 4 to the post of Part Time Water Carrier in Government Primary School Chambhu. The suitability of the petitioner and respondent No. 4 was gone into by the duly constituted Selection Committee. Petitioner has secured 21.5 marks, whereas respondent No. 4 has secured 22 marks. Consequently, this Court will not sit in appeal over the recommendations made by a duly constituted Selection Committee, since no malafides have been alleged against the members of the Selection Committee. Moreover, it is also alleged in the reply that the respondent No. 4 is a widow. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. [ (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 07, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - - 3 -