IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17395 of 2010 GAUTAM MAHTO SON OF DINA MAHTO @ DINESH MAHTO R/O VILL- SHIGHARI, P.S.- MANIKPUR, DISTRICT- LAKHISARAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21/05/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner is one of the named accused of the case registered under Sections 414/34 Indian Penal Code on the allegation that he along with other accused persons were suspected to be involved in retaining stolen vehicles. Submission is that since prior to the occurrence the petitioner was in custody, so his involvement cannot be presumed and there is no report of theft. So it cannot be presumed that the vehicle was stolen one. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M./concerned Court, Lakhisarai in connection with Surajgarha (Manikpur) P.S. Case No. 398 of 2009. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)