1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. DISTRICT : CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.389 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION ST.NO.26120 of 2010 (Pralhad Ganpatrao Bhavre V/s State of Maharashtra & ors.) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s orders. Mr.H.V. Waghmare, Advocate for applicant. Mr.D.V. Tele, A.P.P. for respondent no.1. Mr.A.N. Nagargoje, Advocate for respondent no.8. ..... CORAM: SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATED : 20th April, 2010. ----- 1. Heard Mr.H.V. Waghmare, learned counsel for applicant as well as Mr.D.V.Tele, learned A.P.P. for respondent no.1 and Mr.A.N. Nagargoje, learned counsel for respondent no.8. Respondent nos.2 to 7 absent, inspite of service. 2. This is an application preferred by applicant (original complainant) requesting to condone delay of 77 days caused in filing accompanying criminal revision application. 3. Considering the contents of application and for the reasons stated in the application, it appears that delay of 77 days caused in filing 2 accompanying criminal revision application is not willful, deliberate and intentional, and therefore, same needs to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4. In the result, present application allowed in terms of prayer clause `B' and delay of 77 days caused in filing accompanying criminal revision application stands condoned and accompanying criminal revision application be registered accordingly. [SHRIHARI P. DAVARE] JUDGE gas/cri389.10