IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.28568 of 2009 1. SUBODH SINGH 2. SATISH SINGH @ GORELAL SINGH .. Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR .. Opposite Party **** /3/ 19.11.2009 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted under Sections 25(1-B)A, 25(A), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that today a supplementary affidavit is being filed explaining the antecedent of the petitioners wherein it has been stated that initially there was four cases pending against the petitioners out of which he has been acquitted in two cases whereas the third case relates to a case under Essential Commodities Act and fourth is under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code in which he is said to be a member of unlawful assembly, let the petitioners, above named, from whose custody one country made rifle and five cartridges were recovered, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Narhat P.S. Case No. 36 of 2009 to the 2 satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, on the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of each of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner(s) is/are implicated in any other case of similar nature after his/their release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (iii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he/they fail(s) to do so on two given dates and delay(s) the trial in any manner then his/their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)