m, Resp ondents A131) lie ant Iiulsibai D/o Sukhram Sahu Versus 1. S tate of Eadhya LPraéesh Through its Secretary Milligtxy of Health Services Bhopal anti others 0.1;. No. E’XQI/iggz TREBIJNALS iiCT, 198 5 .n 3M1 VIS'J RATIVE ’l‘ R UNAL AT JABAIA?UR IN THE STEP ‘r‘ £1133LICATIOE {WENR $ECTION 19 Oi? THE AREINISTBATIVE IB Since no representation is made on behalf of the petitioner even after issuance of nxed date SPC, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the petition for non pl 'osecution. Accordin‘giy, the petition is However, the petitioner will have revival of the petition if occasion so ’ Sd/— { Pritinker Diwzikiea‘j dismissed for non prosecution. iiberty to flle an application for Judge wafer emu game, mania—FsksAt 1 nuns—«1 ,on,ooo. * ~ , " Wmm . W‘mnfsarm mam SB: Hon. Mr. Justice Priti 1ker Diwaker 28.08.2009: