IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 10938 of 2008 Between: P. Veerendra S/o. Peerya Naik R/o. Quarter No.34, Type-3, I.G.Mint, Cherlapally, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PET IT IONER AND 1 Union of India, rep. by its Group Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, Ministry of Home Affairs, Hakeempet, NISA, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, Ministry of Home Affairs, I.G. Mint, Cherlapally, Ranga Reddy District. 3 P.P. Goswami, Sub-Inspector, CISF UNit, I.G. Mint, Cherlapally, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT (S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.1 in not passing the orders in the Appeal, dt. 28.04.2008 which is preferred against proceedings No.V-15014/CISF/UR- 37/DISC(01/08)/PA/08-859, dated 08.04.2008 of the 2nd respondent is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to pass appropriate orders in the suspension petition as well as Appeal, dt. 28.04.2008 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.M.NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.10938 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a Mandamus declaring the action of the ﬁrst respondent in not passing orders in appeal dated 28.4.2008 as arbitrary and illegal. There is no necessity of going into all the details. The learned counsel for petitioner states that the appeal ﬁled by the petitioner has already been disposed of by the competent authority, therefore the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. ________________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 8.9.2008 DA THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.10938 of 2008 8.9.2008