$ / ,3 / C¢L©DL IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. WW 0f 2006 PETITIONER : K D. KV S. Thakur, aged about 56 years, S/o Shri Topnath Singh Thakur, é....... .- .11$/Assistant GTade HI, Office of Executive PV§ ”\o. ..... {x :E EngineenPublic Works Depaltment,Raigarh, ."' ..... R/o : Village - Chhal, Tahsil - Dharamj aigarh, Raigarh, District - Raigarh (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) / 2. Executive Engineer Public Works Department, Division Raigarh, Tahsil and District - Raigarh (CG) 3. Sub-Divisional Ofiicer Public Works Department, x33 / District — Raigarh (CG) coMM/ss/ G W 0* q» Sub-Division Sarangarh, AMRNA “ .\, a (gay? ‘ ’ M vw “We J/ x " x WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22/6/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA A G " “”m. e HIGH QQURT OF JUDLCATURE CHHATTISéARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Sufish K. Agniho‘l'r'i, J. W. P. (s) No‘ 4901 of 2006 Pe‘l'ifioner : UK. 5. Thakur‘ Versus Responden‘rs : The 51am of Chha‘r'risgarh 6: ofhers Shri Rakesh Amhony, Advoca're for The pe‘rifioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govt Advoca‘re for The STafe/respondenfs. ORDER (Passed an 8'” ef September, 2006) 1. By ‘rhis pe‘ri‘rion, The pe1’i1'ioner' has challenged Iegali'ry of The fransfer' order- dcrred 6.7.2006 (Annexure P—1), whereby he has been Transferred from Raigarh Division ‘ro Ambikapur Circle. 2. The main grievance of the petitioner is tha‘r he is working as Assisi-om Grade-III and The senioriTy of AssisTanT Grade-III‘ empioyees ore being mainTained circle wise and in supporT, a gradaTion IisT has been enclosed as Annexure P-2, which has noT been denied by learned GovernmenT AdvocaTe for The STaTe. 3. r Learned counsel for The peTiTioner submiTs ThaT if The order impugned is allowed To be execuTed, Then The senioriTy of The peTiTioner shall be affecTed, Therefore, The peTiTioner may be allowed To make a deTailed represenTaTion To respondenT No.1 and r_,_ r, Bablu @ in fum, ‘the responden‘l‘s be directed 1'0 decide The same in accordance wi‘rh law. Having heard learned counsel for 1’he parTies and having regard To fhe fac‘rs and circumstances of 1'he case, wifhou? expressing any opinion on The meri‘r of The case, The peTiTioner is allowed To make a deTailed represenTaTion raising all his grievances To respondenT No. 1 wiThin 10 days from Today along wiTh a copy o£ This peTiTion & annexures. On such represenTaTion being filed The respondenT No. 1 shall decide The same wiThin a period of 3O days from The daTe of receipT of The said represenTaTion in accordance wiTh law afTer considering all The poinTs raised by The peTiTioner. In The meanTime, Till The decision of The represenTaTion The effecT and‘operaTion of The impugned order daTed 6.7.2006 (Annexure P—l) in respecT of The peTiTioner shall remain sTayed. WiTh The direcTion aforesaid, The peTiTion sTands disposed of. ConsequenTly, M.(W.)P. No. 3787/06 also sTands disposed of. CerTified copy as per rules. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge l i cavL j I l