J[. ,,,.,^^ (L? v^w^lS^-- L.-''*" ^•••••••••" ^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR ^)6^ , 3'^ Second Appeal No.- of 2006 .*?-^'^,,*^ ^ is - -^ ^ Appellant Plaintiff Versus Respondents Defendants ^'^ ^ r & ^" A^ ^\'y ^ oV^ ov^ <'Bheekham S/o Ranjeet Aged about 5/., years Caste - Ghasia, R/o Village Bagudega, Tahsil Gharghoda, District Raigarh (C.G.) 1. Pitar Pradhan S/o Ghasiram Kanwar (Dead) ^l. (a) Ashmti W/o Pitar Pradhan, aged about 65 years 1. (b) Budhram S/o Pitar Pradhan, aged about 40 years 1. (c) Sukhram S/o Pitar Pradhan, -" aged about 35 years, all R/o village Bggudega, Tahsil Gharghoda, District Raigarh 2. Alekh S/o Mahadev 3. Kanak S/o Chaitram r Respondents No. 2 and 3 are R/o village Bagudega, Tahsil Gharghoda, District Raigarh ^. The State of Chhattisgarh ^yd-<^/ .' COl/^C^V^ P^d^Y^ HECQDEOFCIVIL SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECnON'lOOOFTH^ PROCEDURE Valuation of appeal Rs.1^5/- fas valued before the Courts_be!owL r,, ^ XI-HC-78 +11H^Jl $h.*1Td» 3:5? •^)*IK''(<4,^T{°i«41®,fcKtl'My. ^.^^3:7^/^^^00 ^Tq^^iqp ^T^T^r^l<?b <RT3TT^Tsb^icb —^>t ^' f^^ ?^<TTW ^rf^cT ^n^T 06.10.2006 Shri S.C. Verma, counse! fclr the appeliant. Nonefor the respondents Even In the second caii nonl • The matter is Ijsted for hed for condonation of delay in flling with a deiay of 185 days. The above application i^ Cohsequentiy, the instant appea! i| ^i^f^i^ *4<H^^tel:^'<F3i«i< ^^?^R'3TT^T v ^ appears forthe appellarit Ting onM.C.P.Np. 1539/06, appiication the appeal as the same has been filed dismissed for want of prosecutlon. s aiso dismissed being tlme barred. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.