FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11001 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. B.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE :- 7th December, 2010. PER COURT :- 1] The petitioner arises out of purely contractual obligation between the parties, which, we are afraid, cannot be gone into in the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of "Radhakrishna Agrawal and others Vs. State of Bihar and others" reported in (1997) 3 SCC 457, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition in the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the writ petition is summarily rejected. [R.M. BORDE, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/- FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11001 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2