1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.77 OF 2007 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.69 OF 2005 Shaikh Jaibunnisa Abdul Latif & 33 Ors. .. Appellants Vs. Nirajan Singh Bajaj & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.R.G.Ketkar i/b Mr.Sagar Joshi for the appellant None for the respondents CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL & & & A.A.SAYED, JJ A.A.SAYED, JJ A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2007 DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2007 DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2007 P.C.: 1. The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have preferred the Letters Patent Appeal for invoking the appellate jurisdiction under the Contempt of Courts Act which is not proper and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the Letters Patent Appeal. 2. Permitted to withdraw. Letters Patent 2 Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Needless to say that the remedy available to the appellants under the Contempt of Courts Act does not stand exhausted by withdrawing this appeal. In view of dismissal of Letters Patent Appeal, Civil Application does not survive and the same is dismissed as infructuous. ( SHRI J.N. PATEL, J ) ( SHRI J.N. PATEL, J ) ( SHRI J.N. PATEL, J ) ( SHRI A.A. SAYED, J ) ( SHRI A.A. SAYED, J ) ( SHRI A.A. SAYED, J )