WP(C) 1063/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Heard Mr MH Talukdar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Al so heard Mr S. Saikia, learned Standing Counsel, P.W.D. for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Mr RK Bora, learned State counsel for the respondent Nos. 5 and 6. Considering the grievance raised in the writ petition and as agreed to b y the learned counsel appearing for the parties, this writ petition is being dis posed of at the motion stage itself. Petitioner’s case, in brief, is that the petitioner’s father Gokul Chandra Lask ar died on 03.08.2010 while he was serving as Lower Division Assistant in the of fice of the Executive Engineer, P.W.D., NEC Division, Kampur, Nagaon. His fathe r was the only bread earner in the family and thus after his death, the entire f amily is suffering from immense financial hardships. Therefore, the petitioner b eing duly qualified son of the deceased had submitted application on 28.09.2010 in accordance with law before the Executive Engineer, P.W.D., Kampur, NEC Divisi on, Nagaon for appointment on compassionate ground in any Grade- III post and th e matter was placed before the District Level Committee (’DLC’ for short). Howev er, his case has not been considered by the DLC till date. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has approached this Court praying for a directi on to the DLC for considering his case for appointment on compassionate ground. It is submitted at the Bar that the issue involved in this instant writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 03.08.2006 passed i n a batch of writ petitions, the leading case being WP(C) No. 3875/2005 (Achyut Ranjan Das & Ors. Vs. the State of Assam & Ors.) reported in (2006) 4 GLT 674. Recently this Court vide order dated 02.07.2010 passed in WP(C) No. 2620/2009 (F aziron Nessa Vs. State of Assam and others) and in similar other cases, while a dopting the measures contained in Achyut Ranjan Das (supra) has further made it clear that the DLC as well as State Level Committee (’SLC’ for short) shall com municate the incumbent about the outcome of his/her case for appointment on comp assionate ground. Considering the matter in its entirety and the decision rendered by this Court in Faziron Nessa (supra), this petition is disposed of with a direction t hat as and when the DLC sits for consideration of cases of appointment on compas sionate ground, petitioner’s case shall also be taken up for consideration along with similarly situated persons and the decisions so arrived at would be communi cated to the petitioner within a fortnight of such decision, in view of the dire ction issued in Achyut Ranjan Das (supra) and Faziron Nessa (supra). The petitioner is at liberty to submit a certified copy of this order al ongwith copies of the orders passed in Achyut Ranjan Das (supra) and Faziron Nes sa (supra) before the respondent No. 5. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.