IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14450 of 2007 PREMA RAMAN Versus THE BHARAT PETROLLEUM CORPORATION LTD & ORS. ----------- 2 9.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. By way of the present writ application the petitioner is seeking disposal of her representation which was filed by her against selection of private respondent no.3, namely, Nutan Devi. The selection process was carried out in the year 2007 for award of LPG distributorship at Bajpatti in the district of Sitamarhi. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there were certain infirmities in the candidature of private respondent no.3. She did not have financial capability nor did she have proper land still she was shown to be at serial no.1. Petitioner was given an opportunity to appear before the respondents with all the supporting materials in support of the allegation but it is her stand that the communication reached her after the date fixed, which was 13th August, 2007. A request for fixing next date was made but after that the Corporation is maintaining silence. No doubt the writ application was filed in the year 2007 but the current status of the selection is not known even to learned counsel for the petitioner. In all probability the selected candidate must have set up the LPG distributorship since almost three years have expired after selection was made. Be that as it may the Corporation will be well - 2 - advised to communicate to the petitioner the current status as well as position with regard to the selection of respondent no.3 as also the status of complaint filed by the petitioner before the respondents. The communication to the petitioner must be made within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication or production of a copy of this order. This writ application is disposed of with the above direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)