:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.212 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.212 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.212 OF 2008 WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.257 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.257 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.257 OF 2008 M/s.Anurag Sites ...Appellant. v. The Mumbai Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumbai ...Respondents. Mr.Karl Shroff i/by Shri Tanvir Shaikh , advs. for the Appellant. Mrs.Geeta Joglekar , adv. for the Respondent/BMC. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 11th March, 2008. DATE: 11th March, 2008. DATE: 11th March, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The respondent/Corporation issued a notice to the plaintiff/appellant about revocation of permission for displaying hoardings on the ground that the plaintiff had cut the trees and thereby violated legal provisions in respect of preservation of trees in the city. That notice was challenged by the plaintiff in the suit and by the notice of motion he sought temporary injunction against the Corporation. The learned trial Court refused ad-interim relief. Therefore, the plaintiff has preferred the present appeal. Admittedly, the notice of motion is still pending and the respondent has not filed any reply. There appears some dispute as to who had cut the trees. In the given circumstances, appeal stands disposed off with the following :2: directions: i. Respondent/Corporation shall file reply to the notice of motion within two weeks from this day and the trial Court shall hear the parties and dispose off the notice of motion within three weeks thereafter. Till then the parties shall maintain status-quo. 2. As the appeal itself is disposed off, civil application does not survive and stands disposed off accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)