THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.11852 of 2011 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to set aside the order passed in Crl.R.P.No.11 of 2010 dated 3.12.2010, by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool at Nandyal, wherein and whereby the order dated 22.2.2010, passed by the II Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Nandyal, in Crl.M.P.No.43 of 2009 in S.C.No.205 of 2009 discharging the petitioners/A.2 to A.6 under Section 326 IPC while the charges made under the other Sections of law remain intact, was confirmed, and consequently the petitioners pray to quash the proceedings in S.C.No.205 of 2009, on the file of the II Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District. Heard. The brief averments of the petition in the trial court are that the petitioners/A.2 to A.6 are working in the police department and they are denying the accusation against them; that on the instructions of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nandyal, they discharged their official duties; that without obtaining sanction orders for their prosecution, the criminal prosecution against them is not maintainable and hence sought for their discharge. After hearing both sides and on considering the material available on record, the II Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Nandyal, partly allowed the Crl.M.P.No.43 of 2009 in S.C.No.205 of 2009, by order dated 22.2.2010 discharging the accused 2 to 6 under Section 329 of IPC, while the charges made under the other Sections of Law remained intact. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners preferred revision before the III Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool at Nandyal in Crl.R.P.No.11 of 2010 and after hearing both sides, the same was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the present petition is filed. The learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing the matter for some time, confined his arguments only to the extent to direct the trial court to consider the case without being influenced by the order dated 22.2.2010, passed by the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool at Nandyal in Crl.R.P.No.11 of 2011. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that a direction can be given to the trial court because the trial courts are always entrusted with the work of appraising the cases on merits on the basis of the evidence adduced before the trial court. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. However, the II Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Nandyal, Kurnool District, is here by directed to dispose of S.C.No.205 of 2009, on merits, in accordance with law without being influenced by order dated 03.12.2010 passed in Crl.R.P.No.11 of 2010, by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool at Nandyal. Miscellaneous Petitions filed in this Criminal Petition, if any, shall stand closed. _________________ RAJA ELANGO,J Date:23.11.2011. Gk. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.11852 of 2011 Date: 23.11.2011. Gk.