Sr. No. Date i 2/. Orders % 13.01.2006 Present: MrvSandeep Sharma, Advocate for the Decree Holder. lyiTHRainajLiIlapur, Advocate tor the Juugsricnt Debtor. + ES.F.220/2Q02 "The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the award dated 28.3.2002 has not been given under the Ai'biti-ation and Conciliation Act. 1996 and, therefore, it is to be made Rule of tirie Court before it can be executed and relies on the judgment of Apex Court in Milkfood. In view of the award having been not made Rule of the Court, the learned counsel for the petitioner seelcs to withdraw the execution petition. Execution petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All the interim ordere passed are vacated and aU the pending interim applications ai^e also disposed of. JanuaiT 13. 2006 'k' 0« : ANIL KUA'IAR. J 'L, SACHKHAND PRINTERS 01/05 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified