IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21887 of 2011 Digvijay Mahato Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 22.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Barharia P.S.Case No. 106/2010 under Section 366(A)/34 of the IPC. The allegation was that three persons including the petitioner had taken away Priyanka Kumari aged about 14 years on 05.7.2010 with the intention of marriage. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation itself is false since three persons could not proceed to marry with one girl and secondly, he also submits that the girl has since returned. He submits that two persons have been taken into custody including the petitioner, who himself voluntary surrendered before the Court below on 03.1.2011. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner be released on bail after furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in Barharia P.S.CaseNo.106/2010. Sudha ( Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)