IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-29846 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 26, 2009 Sukhjit Singh and another … Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present: Mr. K.K. Saini, Advocate, for the petitioners. S.D. Anand, J (Oral) Crl. Misc. Nos. 53952 & 53953 of 2009 Allowed, as prayed for. Crl. Misc. No.M-29846 of 2009 Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he would be content and interests of justice would be served if a direction is issued to respondent No.3 – Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala, to provide paid security to the petitioners in the course of their visit to Kapurthala. Notice of motion. Crl. Misc. No. M-29846 of 2009 On the asking of the Court, Mr. B.B.S. Teji, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. The petition shall stand disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 – Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala, to provide security to the petitioners in the course of their visit to District Kapurthala. For obtaining security, the petitioners shall notify their presence to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala and the latter shall comply with the order of this Court forthwith. It will be for the petitioners to pay the security charges as per rules on the subject. The order shall be operative for a period of two years from the date of this order. Disposed of accordingly. A copy of the order be given to the learned State counsel under the signatures of Special Secretary. October 26, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2