IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 52 of 2006 Date of decision : 25.9.2006 Amarjit Singh ....Appellant Versus Mohammad Islam and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.R.S.Mamli, Advocate for the appellant. ... MAHESH GROVER, J.(Oral) The present appeal is directed against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kurukshetra dated 1.10.2005 passed in M.A.C.T. Case No.97 of 2004 The appellant was the owner of the Matador (Maxi-Cab 1997 Model) bearing No.HR-03-B-1079 which was damaged in the accident. He filed a claim petition on account of the damage to the said vehicle. The Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.50,000/-. Dissatisfied with the award of the Tribunal, the appellant in the present appeal has prayed for enhanced compensation. A perusal of the record shows that there was no report by the surveyor or any other mechanic to support the case of the appellant. The evidence adduced by the appellant in support of his claim has not been proved in accordance with law and is uninspiring. FAO No. 52 of 2006 -2- In view of this, there is no reason to interfere in the award of the Tribunal and the appeal being devoid of any merit is dismissed in limine. (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE 25.9.2006 (UMA NATH SINGH) JUDGE dss