HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.24226 of 2008 Date : 28-6-2011 Between : N.Dasharath Reddy .. Petitioner And Kambalapally Malla Reddy and others .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri S.S. Bhatt Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 13 : Sri K.Rama Mohan Madhava Counsel for respondent Nos.14 & 15 : A.G.P. for Home The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.14 and 15 in not conducting investigation, arresting the accused and filing charge sheets in Crime Nos.5/2006 and 158/2006 of Saroornagar Police Station as illegal and arbitrary. This court by order dated 13-9-2010, while observing that both the cases were simply closed referring as undetectable, adjourned the case for getting fresh report from the respondents. Accordingly, report dated 4-11-2010 has been submitted by respondent No.14. It is inter alia stated in the said report that during the course of investigation, statements of complainant and other witnesses were recorded, the scene of offence was visited and a panchanama was conducted. That while the initial investigation revealed that no incident as alleged has taken place on 19-2-2006, the further investigation reveals that on 1-1-2006, the daughter-in-law of the petitioner committed suicide at the latter’s house, that on 2-1-2006, after completion of post-mortem examination, the dead body was brought to the house of the petitioner to perform final rites, that some of the relatives of the accused with an intention to recover dowry amount resorted to violence by damaging the furniture and throwing the same in front of the petitioner’s house and burnt the same in emotion. It is further stated that respondent No.1 and his associates N.Narsireddy, L.Yadagiri Reddy, D.Bhaskar Reddy and K.Krishna Reddy were not involved in the commission of the said offence, that as the identity of the accused involved in the crime could not be established even after their best efforts, the case was referred as undetected for the time being till identification of the accused is established and that as and when their identity is established, the case will be reopened and a final report will be filed. It is assured in the report that after identifying the accused, necessary action will be taken by reopening the case. Even though this report was submitted through Memo dated 9-11-2010, at the hearing the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is unable to state the present stage of the case. Unless a final report has already been filed, respondent No.14 is directed to take all necessary steps for doing the needful as assured in the report referred to above and complete the process within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. . Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel, WPMP No.31570/2008 is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Date: 28-6-2011 AM