IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 8151 of 2010 Date of Decision: 15.12.2010 Bhoop Singh and others .... Petitioners Versus Virender and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Ashok Giri, Advocate for the petitioners 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in the garb of status quo order passed by Appellate Court, respondents are trying to take forcible possession over the property in dispute, hence, status quo order must be quashed. Status quo granted by learned Appellate Court means status quo pertaining to the possession and nature of the property. Status quo does not mean granting any licence or authorisation to the party to take forcible possession if he is not in possession. In the opinion of this Court no interference is called for in the impugned order passed by the Appellate Court. With the above said observations, present petition stands disposed of. (ALOK SINGH) 15.12.2010 JUDGE reena