1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO.451/2010 (Smt. Rukhmabai wd/o Shiva Borkar and others vs. Smt. Subanbi w/o Barliram Kambale and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATED : DECEMBER 13, 2010 Shri Quazi, learned Counsel for the appellants, states that the first appellate Court has not committed any error in modifying the decree passed by the trial Court and holding that Smt. Subanbai was entitled to get 6/15 th share in the suit property. The appellants have taken exception only to effecting of partition of the house property by relying on the provisions of Section 23 of the Hindu Succession Act. It is, however, necessary to note that the provisions of Section 23 of the Hindu Succession Act have been omitted since 2005. In such 2 circumstances, the appellants cannot effectively raise an objection to effecting partition of the house property. In the result, the second appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE khj