:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 838 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 838 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO. 838 OF 1992 Seema Devdas Bhat ..Appellant versus Usha Surendra Suryavanshi ..Respondent Advocates Mr. N. V. Walawalkar with Devidas Keluskar present Mr. K. K. Malpathak for the Respondent. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. DATE : 31ST MARCH, 2005 DATE : 31ST MARCH, 2005 DATE : 31ST MARCH, 2005 ORAL ORDER : ORAL ORDER : ORAL ORDER : 1. Mr. Walawalkar states that his client has taken away the papers from him and they have no further instructions in the matter. Nobody is present for the appellant. Advocate for the respondent is present. 2. He points out that by the impugned judgment the appellant was directed to pay Rs.1,18,200/- to the plaintiff. Even this court when the appeal came to be filed gave further directions of deposit, but :2: the amount was not deposited. Consequently according to him the plaintiff - respondent is at liberty to take actual possession. Since nobody is there for the appellant, appeal is dismissed. Respondent will be entitled to execute her rights. 31.3.2005 (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.)