1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.935 OF 2011 1. Mrs.Mangala Bhaskar Gangurde .Applicants 2. Mrs.Hirabai Baburao Gangurde V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.S.K.Shinde with Mr.Makrand Panchakshari, Advocate, for the Applicants Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for anticipatory bail by two persons, who apprehend arrest in C.R.No.129 of 2011 for the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 420, 219, 196 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Chandwad Police Station, Taluka Chandwad, District Nashik and who, it is alleged that 2 entered into a back dated agreement to purchase some property which vendor Sudarshana alias Baby Gautam Khare had already agreed to sell to the complainant Mrs.Sunanda Uttam Gangurde. She filed a complaint before the learned Judicial Magistrate F. C., Chandwad, who ordered investigation under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. An offence was registered. The learned Additional Sessions Judge rejected the application of the applicants. Though the learned APP for the respondent - State has a very strong objection to grant of bail to the applicants, it is not clear as to why the applicants need to be in custody. Even if, it is presumed that the allegations made in the complaint are correct, since it was vendor Sudarshana Khare, who wanted to avoid selling of property to complainant Mrs.Sunanda Gangurde and instead chose the present applicants. Document has been notarized by a Notary, who has also been made an accused. 3 Considering the nature of allegations made, applicants being in custody for the purpose of further investigation is not necessary. In the event of arrest, applicants be released on bail on their furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs.25,000/- each with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.25,000/- on the following conditions. (i) The applicants shall report at the Chandwad Police Station, Taluka Chandwad, District Nashik on 25th November, 2011 at 11.00 a.m. and thereafter, as and when required by the investigating officer. (ii) The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required. (iii) The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (iv) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. . The order will remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge sheeted the applicant may furnish fresh 4 bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court dated 2nd December, 2010 delivered in Special Leave Petition (Cri.) No.7615 of 2009 (Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State of Maharashtra And Ors.). 3. Bail Application is disposed of. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.) 5