IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-7402 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: November 18, 2011 Krishan Kumar .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the respondent-State contends that there is a complaint against the petitioner and therefore, the petitioner is required to be associated so as to see whether cognizable offence is made out or not. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-State states that a questionnaire would be sent to the petitioner to enable the petitioner to respond so that enquiry can be concluded effectively. Crl. Misc. No. M-7402 of 2011 [2] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that proper assistance would be given to the respondents by way of responding to the queries raised on behalf of the official respondents. 4. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of. (AJAI LAMBA) November 18, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?