IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. 2nd Bail Application No.8801/2010 Subedeen Vs. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor Date of Order ::: 30.09.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Anil Yadav, Counsel for petitioner Shri Piyush Kumar, Public Prosecutor #### By the Court:- This second bail application has been filed by petitioner because his first bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. The challan has not yet been filed. Learned counsel for petitioner sought to argue bail application of accused-petitioner Subedeen on premise that now he has been in jail for last more than three months and, therefore, he should be enlarged on bail. Considering the fact that petitioner has straightaway applied for bail before this court and not approached the court below after dismissal of his first bail application, I am not inclined to entertain this second bail application directly before this Court because the court below also may take into account other subsequent developments that might have taken place and other evidence against accused-petitioner. Learned counsel at this stage sought to withdraw the bail application with liberty to apply before court below. This bail application is therefore rejected, however, with liberty to petitioner to again apply for bail before the court below. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//