1 S.A.No.302.89 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 302 OF 1989 Dr.Harischandra Laxman Patil ... Appellant V E R S U S 1. Dr.Madhav Hari Sarode Dead Through L.Rs. and others ... Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1314 OF 1990 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 302 OF 1989 Dr.Harischandra Laxman Patil ... Applicant V E R S U S 1. Dr.Madhav Hari Sarode Dead Through L.Rs. and others ... Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10365 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 302 OF 1989 Dr.Harischandra Laxman Patil ... Applicant V E R S U S 1. Dr.Madhav Hari Sarode Dead Through L.Rs. and others ... Respondents ... Mr. S.P.Bramhe,Advocate holding for Mr. P.R.Katneshwarkar,Advocate for Appellant/ Applicant Mr. S.D.Kulkarni for Respondent Nos.1A and 1B Mr. S.B.Yawalkar,Advocate holding for Mr. Girish V.Wani,Advocate for respondent No.1C,1D Respondent Nos.2 and 3 though served, but absent. ... 2 S.A.No.302.89 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 502 OF 1989 Dr.Madhav Hari Sarode Dead Through L.Rs. ... Appellant V E R S U S 1. Dr.Harischandra Laxman Patil and others ... Respondents ... Mr. S.B.Yawalkar,Advocate holding for Mr. Girish V.Wani,Advocate for appellant Mr. S.P.Bramhe,Advocate holding for Mr. P.R.Katneshwarkar,Advocate for respondent no.1 ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11887 OF 2004 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 502 OF 1989 Dr.Harischandra Laxman Patil ... Applicant V E R S U S 1. Dr.Madhav Hari Sarode Dead Through L.Rs. and others ... Respondents ... Mr. S.P.Bramhe,Advocate holding for Mr. P.R.Katneshwarkar,Advocate for Applicant Mr. S.D.Kulkarni for Respondent Nos.1A and 1B Mr. S.B.Yawalkar,Advocate holding for Mr. Girish V.Wani,Advocate for respondent No.1C,1D Respondent Nos.2 and 3 though served, but absent. ... CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 15TH FEBRUARY, 2010 PER COURT 1] The parties in these appeals are present before the Court. The parties have settled their 3 S.A.No.302.89 dispute amicably outside of the Court and they have filed joint pursis (Marked as Exh.X), which is duly signed by the parties and their Advocates. The parties are identified by their respective Advocates. The parties have admitted the contents of this pursis and their respective signatures on it. The parties are withdrawing both the appeals and the original suit would stand decreed in terms of the joint pursis. No order as to costs. Consequently, the Civil Application No 1314 of 1990 and Civil Application No 10365 of 2008 in Second Appeal No.302 of 1989 and the Civil Application No.11887 of 2004 in Second Appeal No. 502 of 2004 also stand disposed of. Sd/- (A.V. NIRGUDE, J.) MTK/