-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1637 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.1637 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.1637 OF 2008 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.1151 OF 1995 APPEAL NO.1151 OF 1995 APPEAL NO.1151 OF 1995 M/s.Dattani Associates & anr. ...Applicants vs. Nand Dham Co-operative Hsg.Soc. Ltd. and another ...Respondents Mr.Anoop Das Gupta i/b M/s.Jhaniani, Narla & Associates for the Applicants Mr.Sameer R. Bhalekar for the Respondents CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 28, 2008. : MARCH 28, 2008. : MARCH 28, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicants and the Advocate for the Respondents. Application is opposed by the Advocate for the Respondents by pointing out that there is a delay of more than six years. 2. Perusal of the Application and record of the First Appeal shows that the Appeal has been dismissed on technical ground of non removal of the office objections. The Advocate for the Applicants has pointed out that on the case Information System available on internet, the Appeal was being shown as pending. In any event, as the Appeal is dismissed only for non removal of the office objection, the same deserves to be restored. 3. Hence, I pass the following order : -2- i) Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to condition that the Applicant will comply with the order dated 8th February 2002 within a period of eight weeks from today. If compliance is not made, order of dismissal of the Appeal will stand. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE