1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 2721 of 2009 Sushil v. The State of Maharashtra -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr Manish Gupta, Adv for applicant Mr A. Parihar, APP for State Coram: A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 20th August 2009 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State. Applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No. 170/09 registered with Police Station, Nandanvan under Sections 498A, 506, 312 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. This Court after hearing counsel for the applicant, granted interim anticipatory bail to the applicants vide order dated 17th July 2009. There is no complaint from learned Additional Public Prosecutor that applicant misused liberty of interim anticipatory bail at any time. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is genuinely interested to cohabit with his wife Priyanka. Applicant and Priyanka were married in December 2008. It is submitted that applicant has filed proceedings before the Family Court for restitution of conjugal rights. 4. In view of what is stated above, no useful purpose would be 2 served in allowing custodial interrogation of the applicant. I am, therefore, inclined to confirm interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant. 5. Order of interim anticipatory bail dated 17th July 2009 is hereby confirmed. Besides the conditions already imposed, applicant is directed to furnish one or more solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- and he shall leave his permanent residential address with telephone/cell phone number with Investigating Officer and shall communicate change, if any therein, in future. Application stands disposed of. Hamdast granted. Judge. hsj