THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.21463 OF 2006 23.10.2006 Between: Nandigala Venmkatareddy, S/o.Appireddy And others … Petitioners AND The District Collector, Guntur And others … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.21463 OF 2006 ORDER: The petitioners, who are ten (10) in number, filed the instant writ petition feeling aggrieved by the notice in RCNCC No.630/NRT/75, dated 29.9.2006. The impugned notice reads as under. Mandal Revenue Office, Rompicherla. R.C.N.C.C.No.630/NRT/75 dt.29.09.06 N O T I C E As per the orders of the Land Reforms Tribunal Chairman, Narasaraopet in his ROR CC No.630/NRT/75 dated 20.3.2006 your allogment of an extent of Acs.0.50 cents of land through Annavarappadu Village Ceiling Case No.630/NRT/75 in Sy.No.65/2(ZI)a was cancelled. Hence the Ceiling Case bearing RC on CC No.630/75 dated 18.8.06 land was taken back the possession of the land. So you please attend the Annavarappadu Village Gram Panchayat Office on 10.10.2006 at 11.00 AM for enquiry and to allot some extent of land in this regard. Sd/- xxx xxx xxx 29.9.06 R.D.O. Rompicherla By issuing the above notice, the second respondent advised the petitioners to appear for enquiry on 10.10.2006. Though the notice also refers to alleged cancellation of allotment, nothing prevents the petitioners to appear before the second respondent and place the material in the enquiry. The apprehension of the petitioners that they might not be allowed to take away crop is misconceived. The impugned notice nowhere directs the petitioners to vacate the land. Therefore, liberty is given to the petitioners to appear before the second respondent and participate in the enquiry. The writ petition, with the above observations, is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) October 23, 2006 YS