IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.36849 of 2010 TARKESHWAR TIWARY @ CHUNNU TIWARY Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Parmila Devi ----------- 2/ 10.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Cruelty is followed by demand and ouster from matrimonial house. Once it was complained by filing a complaint case which ended in no action against in-laws including this petitioner. For the same cause, this complaint is lodged but continuation of demand for such a long period is not believed for refusal of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 2816 of 2009/Trial No. 2799 of 2010 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gopalganj subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)