S.B.CIVIL SALES TAX REVISION PET. NO.54/2009 (ACTO, Hanumangarh vs. M/s Bihani Udhyog) DATE OF ORDER : 16/2/2009 HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.Vinit Kumar Mathur with Mr.Rishabh Sancheti, for the petitioner. This revision petition is directed against the order of Tax Board dated 5/5/2008, whereby, concurring with the first Appellate Authority, the learned Tax Board has held that the Notification dated 15/3/1996 would apply in the case of assessee for the purchase of oil seeds between 1.4.2001 to 31/3/2002, the assessment period, and the general Notification dated 28/9/1995 would not apply. From the perusal of the order and after hearing the learned counsel, this Court does not find any error in the impugned order of the Tax Board as it is well settled that special Notification providing for rate of tax on purchase of particular commodity would override the general Notification, if any. Therefore, there is no force in the revision petition. The revision petition is dismissed accordingly. Copy of this order be sent to the respondent. (DR.VINEET KOTHARI), J. item no.7 baweja/-