IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26869 of 2009 1. MADAN RAM 2. GUDDU RAM ---- PETITIONERS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----OPP. PARTY. ----------- 02 17.08.2009 Heard both sides. Two petitioners seek bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Section 366A of the Penal Code. The date of occurrence, as per the F.I.R. is 10.11.2008. Initially a complaint was lodged on 24.11.2008 by the father of the victim which was subsequently treated as an F.I.R.. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that going by the narration in the complaint/F.I.R. son of petitioner no.1 appears to be the main accused with whom the girl eloped. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that there is counter version also lodged by non other than the victim herself in the shape of complaint in which she has made allegation against the father. Be that as it may, looking to the allegation contained in the present case, this court is inclined to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioners. Petitioners above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M. Gopalganj in connection with Phulwaria P.S.Case no. 165 of 2008. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)