THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.5524 OF 2010 Dated 10th March, 2010 Between: Mohd Riyazuddin and another …Petitioners And Branch Manager, Deccn Grameena Bank And two others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri Brahmadandi Ramesh Counsel for the respondents : Sri S.Udayachala Rao The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a direction, order or a writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents not to issue any notice, process, summons to the petitioners in respect of the 2nd petitioner’s alleged loan due to the tune of about Rs.46,000/- (wrongly mentioned as sixty eight thousand in Human Rights Commission order) and consequently direct the respondents to return Rs.48,000/- which was recovered from the petitioners and the same was waived under ADWRS scheme by Union of India and restrain the respondents from taking any action against the petitioners in the name of the said due amount.” After arguing the case for sometime, Sri Brahmadandi Ramesh, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to seek recovery of the loan amount said to have been waived by the Bank by filing a civil suit. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP No.7102 of 2010 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 10th March, 2010 vrn