IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 1316 of 2010 Date of Decision: 27.1.2010. Yudhvir & others --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.S. Kundu, Addl. A.G., Haryana has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents-State. The petitioners applied for the post of Driver claiming that they were fully eligible. They were subjected to written test at workshop Haryana Roadways, Karnal and called for interview. They were also required to qualify a driving proficiency test. It is alleged that the petitioners have been selected along with others. As many as 54 persons have been selected out of which 39 persons are from Rohtak district. It is further alleged that 23 selectees even did not participate in the test. The petitioners made a representation dated 22.12.2008 (Annexure P-6). Receiving no response a legal notice (Annexure P-7) has been served. Petitioners have accordingly filed this petition seeking a direction to consider their claim for appointment to the post of Driver on the basis of the selection made. CWP. No. 1316 of 2010 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to decide the representation/legal notice served by the petitioners. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take decision on the representation/legal notice served by the petitioners within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioners is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 27.1.2010. lucky