{@a \\a? HIGH CGURT OF CHHATTI$GARW BILASPUR lnl.." Huh. H—l-i rataikm (2‘1 HH‘ .p hi NS. 1H0 I‘MO m G @633 (Wlit Petition under Articte 227 of Constitutiun of mdia) SB: Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihoui. J. Present: Mr. Ram sharma, counse! fer the petitmner. oRAL oRDER (Passad an thE'E‘hEa§ c} Eanuary, 299a) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submtts that the Court b$low i.e., the Commissioner for Workman Compensatmn. Raipur, has impfeaded the petitioner on the apptication made by the respandente N0. 1 and 2 without having, prima fame. satisfaction asto whether the petitioner was inx any way connected with the work or not. The comprarnants/respondents No. 1 and 2 have also not made anv averment in the commaim asto indicate whether they are aggrieved by any action of the petitioner or they ciaim any retief from the petitioner. 2) On perusal of the impugned order dated 23—7-2063 (Annexure PM). it is evident that the court betow has impleaded the petitioner on prime facie satisfaction observing that the issue invoives proper oonetderetion on examination of witnesees and other evidences. tn View of that, the order is Petttionerl $hekhar Sahu. 34 vears. Sic. “(hes Ram Prcpcsad Sahu, V59. Bhata£h PSIPO B. akh ra, Non-Appiicant. Dhamtari. Versus Respondents 1. Namar 3am. 50 vears. $Jo. Ramnaravan Kppkigéhts arid Nona Sahu. Appitcants ‘2. Smt. Kumari Bai4§. 1 & ‘2 Rio. Kopedéh. PO Chandi Bazaar. PS Abhanpm, Raiplxr. 3. Ataur Rehmaan Khan @ Aim Slo. Daut Khan, R's. Ta} Nagar, $ant<>sh§ Nagar, PS T§kraparé, Kaypur. 4. Bharat Daga thro' Shanker Stationery, Rio. Civi! Lina, éaipur. ,‘ ,,1. just and proper and does not warrant mterference However Imartv is reserved to the petmoner to raise aH the ;ssue$ mciumnq question of ms Impieadment before the court below at aspropnaie stage 3) In View of the foregoing, me petmon ie dismissea/ /\x. // sdl‘ “‘\ 7” Agn3"°m\ /” 53$“ 3;;dge /‘ :z “