CRP 299/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BP KATAKEY Mr. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for striking out the name of the proforma respondent No. 2 as no relief is claimed against him. Prayer is allowed. The name of the proforma respondent No. 2 is struck of. Heard Mr. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. Banerjee, l earned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1. The petitioners, by the present petition, have challenged the order dated 4.5.20 10 passed by the learned executing court in Title Execution case No. 49/2007 rej ecting the prayer for impleadment made by the petitioners under Order 1 Rule 10( 2) CPC. During the course of arguments it has been submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that the decree passed in Title Suit No. 168/2007 has already been e xecuted. The learned counsel for the petitioners, in view of the said position, submits t hat they may be allowed to withdraw the revision petition with liberty to approa ch the learned executing court seeking proper remedy. Prayer is allowed. The revision petition is dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for.