IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 16TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 3768 of 2010(U) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- N.L.KAMATH S/O.LATE R.N.KAMATH, AGED 77 HOUSE NO.40/4161-A T.D.ROAD, FLOWER JUNCTION, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI 682 035. BY ADV. SMT.R.RANJINI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CORPORATION OF KOCHI, PARK AVENUE ROAD KOCHI REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY CORPORATION OF KOCHI, REGIONAL OFFICE ,EDAPPALLY. 3. P.MARIYAPPAN,SHOP ROOM NO.40/4168 &4169 GANAPATHY BHAGYAM TEXTILES, JEWSTREET NEAR FLOWER JUNCTION, ERNAKULAM RESIDING AT CHEMBAKA BHAVANAM, MARATHI COMPOUND PULLEPPADY,ERNAKULAM. ADV. SMT.M.K.PUSHPALATHA,SC,COCHIN CORPORATI FOR R1-2 SC FOR R1 SRI. S. RAMESH BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.3768 OF 2010 (U) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner's complaint is that 3rd respondent is constructing a building in violation of the Building Rules and the conditions of the building permit. According to the petitioner this has been brought to the notice of the 2nd respondent by filing Ext.P3 and there is total inaction on his part. It is therefore that this writ petition is filed. 2. If as stated, a complaint has been received, it is for the 2nd respondent to deal with the same with notice to the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. This the 2nd respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. . Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :