:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 22 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO. 22 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO. 22 OF 2007 IN IN IN MISC. MISC. MISC. PETITION NO. 9 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 9 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 9 OF 2007 IN IN IN PETITION PETITION PETITION NO. NO. NO. 631 OF 2001 631 OF 2001 631 OF 2001 AND AND AND NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 23 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO. 23 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO. 23 OF 2007 IN IN IN MISC. MISC. MISC. PETITION NO. 10 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 10 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 10 OF 2007 IN IN IN PETITION PETITION PETITION NO. 243 OF 1988 NO. 243 OF 1988 NO. 243 OF 1988 Godrej M. Billimoria. ...Petitioner. V/s. Framroz Kaikshuru Batliboi & Ors. ... Respondents. None for the Petitioner. Mr. Vishwanath Patil i/b. Rustamji & Ginwala for the Respondents. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 14TH 14TH 14TH NOVEMBER 2008. NOVEMBER 2008. NOVEMBER 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . This matter was placed before me on 3rd October 2008 and after it was argued for some time the Petitioner’s and Respondents statements were recorded and the matter was adjourned for one week. 2. On 10th October 2008, the Petitioner appeared in person alongwith his Advocate and stated that he wishes to discharge his Advocate. Accordingly, the said Advocate was discharged. The Petitioner was made aware of the fact that he must take steps to engage another Advocate. The :2: order dated 10th October 2008 records this and at the request of the Petitioner, the matter was adjourned for four weeks. 3. It is called out today but neither the Petitioner is present nor the Advocate whom he has engaged. The earlier Advocate whose name appears on the board was specifically discharged from the proceedings. In such circumstances, it is clear that the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. The Notice of Motion is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)