^G-^^'i IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION(C) N0.^$^ OF 2010 PETITIONERfS): ....•-•^'^ ^ \0 ^" y" ^' J^y ^'',.,»-"' y ^^•" .^' <?• iT.Nilesh Kumar Pandey, Aged About- 27 years, S/o- Shri J.P. Pandey, R/o- House No. 807, Om Society, Sundar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) X Kranti Kumar Dewangan, Aged About- 27 years, S/o- Shri Jai Narayan Dewangan, R/o- Shanti Vihar Colony, Daganiya, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS <^ RESPONDENT(S):1. rChhattisgarh Vivekanand University, Through- Chancellor, (C.G.) Swami Technical Bhilai, Its Vice Distt. Durg 2f Registrar, Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G.) <-" 3. Director, Raipur Institute of Technology (RITEE), Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA V HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0.2255 OF 2010 PETITIONERS Nilesh Kumar Pandey & Another Versus RESPONDENTS Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University & Others Gowri (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri SatishK. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Advocate for the respondents No.1 & 2. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 20th day of September, 2010) 1) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to pursue the pending representation before the respondent authorities for considering their gnevances. 3) Shri Thakur, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 & 2 submits that the pending representation ofthe petitioners shall be considered and decided in accordance with law within 15 days from the date of receipt of the representation. 4) It is ordered, as prayed for. 5) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge