IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11804/2008 Decided on:27.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Anjali Maria. …Petitioner. Versus H.P.S.E.B. and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Dinesh Bhanot, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. Dinesh Bhanot submits that the present list is covered by the judgment by the learned erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in OA (D) No. 414/1998, titled as Veena Devi versus H.P.S.E.B. and others decided on 29.6.2001. Mr. Bhanot also submits that this judgment has been upheld by this Court in CWP No. 1134/2001 decided on 4.8.2008. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner, as per the principles laid down in the above cited 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 judgment, within a period of two months, from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 27.12.2010 *awasthi*