1 sg IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.693 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.934/2011 Narayan Jyotiram Shegaonkar ... Appellant Versus BMC ... Respondents Mr. B.P. Shukla Advocate for the appellant. Ms. K.K. Soran for MMC. CORAM : SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 02ND SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C. 1. The plaintiff claims protection of a structure in a slum for which he is added in the list to be considered for development by the Deputy Collector Slums, Mumbai. The list shows the name of the plaintiff as an eligible encroacher in the slum. Any extension made to the structure being Zopri No.50 under No.166/1275 used for residential purpose by the plaintiff from 1995, can not be demolished by the respondent since it is prima-facie shown to be in a slum. To that extent and for the aforesaid structure being Zopri No.50 under No.166/1275, an ad-interim injunction deserves to be granted. The ad-interim order is, accordingly, set aside and injunction in terms of the above is granted pending the notice of motion in the Bombay City Civil Court. A.O. is disposed of accordingly. C.A. is disposed of as infructuous. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.)