IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.6244 of 2009 (O&M) Decided on : 03.11.2009 Kartar Kaur & others ... Petitioners versus Surinder Kaur ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. O.P.Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for respondent. **** 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) After hearing both the counsel, the controversy has been considerably narrowed down. Both the counsel are agreed that the impugned order dt. 22.10.2009 be set aside and the petiton be decided by ld. Tribunal after hearing both the parties. Since the counsel for the elected candidates was not present, the impugned order is set aside with a direction to the learned Tribunal to decide the matter after hearing both the counsel on the date fixed. This revision petition is allowed in the above said terms. November 03, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE