IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5874 of 2009 CHANDRAWATI DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.01.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner is the mother-in-law apprehending arrest in a Police Case Under Sections 304, 201 and 34 of the Penal Code. The defence from Para 185 of the case diary is the recording by the Investigating Officer that witnesses told him that the deceased was suffering from “stomach and other ailments” to submit a chargesheet under Section 498A of the Penal Code. The allegations are of a marriage in May 2007, demands for dowry by way of a motorcycle and other items, throwing the newly wedded out of the house leading to institution of Case No. 1301/2008 on 30.6.2008. Thereafter the accused offered to take back the victim to his house on 7.5.2008 when she is stated to have died on 8.7.2008. In the nature of the allegations, the onus lying upon the petitioner, investigation with regard to her being still pending, Her husband and son both being in custody, the ingenuity of the Investigating Officer of the manner in which he has conducted the investigation, there being no conclusive material in the case diary of the nature of the ailment when the Investigating Officer states that the deceased was taken to the PMCH for treatment,, this Court is not persuaded that present is a fit case for privilege of anticipatory bail. This application is rejected. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)