IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17965 of 2011 Md. Chhote, S/O-Md. Rashul Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 28.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report but his name surfaced in course of investigation. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that final form was submitted showing only suspicion against the petitioner but on the basis of protest petition cognizance has been taken against the petitioner. It would appear from perusal of the impugned order that except the confessional statement of co-accused as well as this petitioner, there is nothing against him. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Rajiv Ranjan, Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 642 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)