IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 12958 of 2011 Date of decision November 28, 2011 Baldev Singh and another ....... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Karan Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Navdeep Sukhna, DAG., Punjab for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent Nos. 4 and 5. Mr. Yatharth Hans, Advocate for respondent Nos. 6 to 8. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is satisfied that neither fourth respondent nor sixth respondent are causing any disturbance to his possession. In the present state of circumstances the petitioner would require no further assistance. 2. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 28 , 2011 archana