-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2659 OF 2008 Hindi Prachar Mandal and another ... Petitioners versus Dr. Jaiprakash Lalji Mishra ...Respondent Mr. S.G. Karandikar for the petitioners. Respondent present in person. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR, J. DATE: JULY 09, 2008. P.C. This petition is filed challenging the execution proceedings taken out by the respondent-workman on the basis of the order passed by the Presiding Officer, Additional School Tribunal, Navi Mumbai, in Appeal No. 29 of 2002. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the said order of the Tribunal is challenged by way of writ petition in which, however, no interim order operates. In my view, when the execution proceedings are taken out by the respondent in view of the order of the School Tribunal and such order is not stayed by the High Court in writ petition, the executing court is certainly entitled to proceed with the execution proceedings in accordance with law. I do not find any substance in this petition and no case is made out for quashing the execution proceedings. However, it is clarified -2- that the executing Court shall execute the order of the School Tribunal in accordance with law and as per the direction given by the Tribunal in its order. In view of what is stated hereinabove, this petition is dismissed at the admission stage. P.B. MAJMUDAR, J.