3. The issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A.No.2745i&9 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others v. State of MP. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitied to regular pay scaie with effect from the date of initiai appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon‘bie Supreme Court. The , appeal was dismissed'by the Hon'bie Supreme Court uphoiding the decision of HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Single Bench: Honybie Shgi Manindra Mohan $hrivastava, J. WRIT PgTiTION (S) No.3430i2010 PETITIONER Rashid Khan Versu§ RESPONDENTS State of Chhaiiisgarh and others i N UNDER ARTIC E __ __________________ Present: ~ $hri K3. Pawar. counse! for the patitionef. Ms. Smita Ghai, Pane! Lawyer for the stats. QBALQEQ§R (Passed on 12‘“ My, 2010) 1. The petitioner petitioner was appointed as Trainee Teécher on probation on a fixed pay of Rs.100/- and after completion of basic training. he was granted reguiar pay scale of Rs.169-300/—. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner A; w submiie that the issue involved in the case is as to whether, the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appeintment or after completion of probation period. the Tribunal to the effect that the TeachersiAssistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. 4. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner further submits that this Court, whiie considering the same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu & others v. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & another, W.P.(S).No.-813 of 2007, by order dated 12/02/2007, has granted regular pay seals with effect from the date of initial appointment. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submis that now the sate Government has also issued a circular on 13/0112009 whereby it has been ordered that all the Deputy TeacherslAssistant Teachers] Teachers appointed before 1962 and after 1995 on a fixed pay, shall be entitled to regutar pay scale from the date of appointment and increments during the probation period, in the event, they have successfully completed two years of probation. 6. Learned counsel for respondents submm that if the petitioner makes such representation to the authorities, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. . 7. In view of the above statements, this petition is tinally disposed off. lf the petitioner makes representation to respondent No.2, claiming relief as prayed in this petition, the same shall be decided by respondent No.2, in accordance with i law. %g i.\_ g, Sd/~ Manindra Mohan Shrivastavaé Judge