1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3847 OF 2009 Rajan Ravinchandran Iyer .. Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr.Uday Warunjikar for the applicant. Mrs.P.P.Shinde A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE, J. DATED : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This is the second application for bail. The earlier application of the applicant was rejected vide order dated 13.10.2008. Mr.Warunjikar, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is in custody since last about two and half years and he cannot be kept behind bars indefinitely. He submits that till this date the trial has not commenced. He then submitted that one more accused has been released on bail after the order dated 13.10.2008. On the other hand Ms.Shinde, learned A.P.P. submitted that the trial in the present case is fixed by the Sessions Court on 2.12.2009 and the matter will be heard on day-to-day basis. In view thereof I do not find any substance 2 in the first submission of Mr.Warunjikar. Insofar as the second submission is concerned, I have perused the order dated 4.2.2009 and more particularly paragraph 3 thereof. I do not find any similarity between the case of the present applicant and the accused, who was released by that order. In the circumstances this application is rejected. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)