IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 10804 of 2008 Between: Gadapa Yellaiah S/o. Rajanna R/o. Mancherial Village and Mandal, Adilabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1The District Collector and Megistrate, Adilabad, Adilabad District. 2The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3The Station House Officer, Mancherial, Adilabad Dist. 4The Commissioner, Mancherial Municipality, Adilabad Dist. 5The Tahsildar, Mancherial Mandal, Adilabad Dist. 6The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mancherial, Adilabad Dist. 7The Superintendent of Police, Adilabad, Adilabad District. 8Mohd. Ali S/o. Ajmat Ali Mancherial, Adilabad Dist. 9Ch. Madhusudhan Reddy S/o. Sri Narasimha Reddy Near Old Registration Office, Iqbal Nagar, Mancherial, Adilabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or pass any appropriate orders to declare the action of the respondents in not taking action in terms of the orders of the Hon'ble Court in W.P.M.P.No.3088 of 2002 in W.P.No.2578 of 2002, dated 11.02.2002 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and in violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to register the case by providing necessary security by stopping illegal construction work in Sy.No.87 of Mancherial, Adilabad District and demolish the illegal constructions in the interest of justice and to pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.LAKSHMANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 10804 of 2008 Order: The petitioner is seeking relief of injunction against private respondent Nos. 8 and 9. The petitioner by arraying officials of the Government as party-respondents to the writ petition cannot seek to maintain a writ petition against a relief, which normally is granted by the civil Court. If the unofficial respondents are trying to interfere with his possession, the remedy of the petitioner is to approach the competent Civil Court and obtain necessary orders, but certainly he cannot maintain a writ petition against private respondents by showing the officials of the Government as party-respondents. The writ petition is not maintainable and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 09.06.2008 Nsr