1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. Chamber Summons No.201 of 2008 IN Suit No.1998 of 2007 Jitendra Amritlal Sheth & ors. .. .. Plaintiffs v/s. Matangi Property Pvt.Ltd. .. .. Defendants Mr.Arif Bookwala, Senior Advocate with Mr.Bharat Chaudhari with Mr.Ankit Lohia i/by M.L. Chaturvedi for Plaintiffs. Mr.Navin Joshi for Deft.No.1 . Ms.Hina Mody for Deft.Nos.2 to 51 (except 17 & 30). Mr.J.S.Chandnani for Deft.Nos.17 & 30. Mr.Diwakar Dwivedi for Applicant in Chamber Summons No.1366 of 2008. ----- CORAM : SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. Dated : 6 th January 2009 P.C. : 1. The Plaintiffs have sought inspection of certain documents. The Plaintiffs' Advocate tenders a list of those documents. These are the documents relied upon by the Defendants in specific paragraphs of their Affidavit- in-reply. The Advocate for Defendant No.1 was directed to produce the original Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in Court today. He 2 has failed to produce the original MOU. 2. Ms.Hina Mody appearing for Defendant Nos.2 to 51 has drawn my attention to the order dated 8.8.2008. That order is passed in Notice of Motion No.2674 of 2007. The Defendants had offered inspection of only 4 documents mentioned in that order when the Notice of Motion had come up for hearing. After passing directions for inspection of those 4 documents, the Notice of Motion was adjourned. 3. The Defendants shall show that inspection of those original documents has been given or give inspection of those original documents within 2 weeks from today. The Defendants shall not be entitled to rely upon those documents if inspection is either not shown to be given already or is not given within 2 weeks from today. 4. The statement of the Advocate for Defendant Nos.2 to 51 that the Defendants shall not rely upon any other documents aside from the 4 documents mentioned in the order dated 8.8.2008 is recorded. 5. The Chamber Summons is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.)