^6JZ1o^ pc'v^~^^ ^ 1 & CONSOLIBA1ED MEMO OF REVISION IN fflE HICH COURT OF CHHAinSCARH ^ C.R. No. 90 OF fK.' ^ REVISIONIST: Tirth Itaj Shrivastav, aged 50 years, son of late Shri Ramlal Shrivastav, resident of Shiv Mandir ward Jagdalpur, district Bastar (Chhattisgarh) (Defendant) RESPONDENT: \^L^ ^y,AJ .\VS' ^^y Raman Lal Shrivastav^, aged 45 years, adopted son • of late/ Shri Kishori Lal Shrivastav, original sqii oflate Shri Ram Lal Shrivastava, residenf of Shiv Mandir ward Jagdalpur, district Bdstar (Chhattisgarh)' (Plaintiff) 2. Sudhanshu Shekhar, son of late Shri Abhimanyu Rath, resident of Shiv Mandir ward, Jagdalpur, Bastar (C.G.) 3. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector, Bastar, Jagdalpur. CIVIL REVISION UNDERSECTION 115 OFTHE CODE OF C IVIL PROCEDURE. C-78 VS-av^lWCW, t»Tll<(1<l<»,Rlrtl'Myt tTFIOT^tTf?P ^l;-"-2-l------^20(925 3D^9T (raq»(ljclfj61<Ei) ^ 3II^?T??TlS-li* craT3ii^?Td'ii* BTOT8R^TlteT3II^?T S.B, Hpn'ble Shri Justice N.K. 25.1.2010 Shri Somnath Verma, A Shri GD Wasvrani, No.3. instructions, seeks permissi^ revision with liberty to avail availableto him underthe pro^ cpi<lfn<I1i *ii*io»V^"ls^l'((uitsix ^>3lf^»T3II^?T ^aarwal Jvocate for the applicant. t. Advocate for State/respondent Gdvt Learned counsei ap|3earing for the applicant, on n of this court to withdraw this appropriate remedy that may be isions of law. Prayer is allowed. | < Consequently, the revisfon is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated liberty. No oifder asto costs. Accordingly, M(C)P ^os. 1084/05 & 1791/05 stand disposed of. Sd/- "<'--~ N.K-Agrawai Judge