skc 1 CRI-WP-2553-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2553 OF 2011 Keshav Babli Naik ..Petitioner versus The Senior Inspector of Police, Goregaon Police Station & Ors. ..Respondents Ms. Gunjan Shah and Mr. Sachin Kadam for Petitioner. Mr. D. P. Adsule, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, 13 and 14. Mr. M. V. Holmagi for Respondent No. 9. CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND R. G. KETKAR, JJ. 04 October 2011 P.C. : Not on Board. Mentioned. Upon mentioning taken on board. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the respondent no.9 and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent nos.1 to 4, 13 and 14. 2. The counsel for the petitioner has brought to our notice Order dated 22nd September 2011 passed by this Court. This is Habeas Corpus petition. skc 2 CRI-WP-2553-11 The grievance of the petitioner in the petition is that girl named Trupti Hareshwar Palyekar is about 21 years, was gone missing and therefore the petitioner seeking writ of Habeas Corpus for production of girl Trupti. Respondent No. 9 who claim to be a father-in-law of girl Trupti is represented by Advocate Holmagi in the present petition. The learned counsel made a statement before this Court on 22nd September 2011 that the respondent no. 9 will ensure that girl Trupti shall be produced on the next date of hearing since he had also expressed an apprehension of danger to the life of the respondent no. 9 as well as girl Trupti, this Court asked respondent no. 9 to get in touch with the concerned police officer. 3. The respondent no. 9 produced the girl Trupti in the Court. We have talked to the girl in chamber and asked her what had happened. Girl Trupti informed the Court that she voluntarily on her own left Bombay and went to Jhansi. She was already knowing Mr. Punit Mahendra Jain – respondent no. 8. Both of them got married on 6th August 2011 at Jhansi and she will be residing with Mr. Punit Mahendra Jain at Jhansi. Girl Trupti has stated before us that she did not leave Bombay either under pressure or under coercion from anybody. She voluntarily on her own free will left Bombay, went to Jhansi, met Mr. Punit Mahendra Jain, both of them got married on 6th August 2011 and are happily staying at Jhansi. skc 3 CRI-WP-2553-11 4. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, the whole purpose of present Habeas Corpus petition has come to an end. However, the counsel for the respondent no. 9 has expressed apprehension of some danger to the life of the respondent no. 9 and Trupti on way back to Jhansi and therefore prayed that appropriate police protection be provided to the girl Trupti and respondent no. 9, who will be leaving Bombay for Jhansi tomorrow i.e. on 5th October 2011. The counsel for the respondent no. 9 has prayed that appropriate direction may be given to provide police protection to girl Trupti and respondent no. 9 from their residence to the airport. Counsel for the respondent no. 9 has submitted that details about the flight number, time of the flight from Bombay to Bhopal shall be communicated to the Colaba Police Station before 8.30 p.m. Today. The learned APP is directed to inform the Police Officer, Colaba Police Station about this order and to tell them to grant necessary police protection from the residence of the respondent no. 9 and where girl Trupti is residing upto Chatrapati Shivaji Terminus (Domestic) / Mumbai Domestic Airport. 5. Both the parties agreed that all allegations made against each other stands withdrawn. skc 4 CRI-WP-2553-11 6. In view of the above referred facts, the purpose of filing Habeas Corpus petition having come to an end, there is no purpose in keeping the present petition pending, same is disposed of accordingly. 7. Parties to act on an ordinary copy of this Order duly authenticated by the Registry of this Court. (D. D. SINHA, J.) (R. G. KETKAR, J.)