dgm gm gm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CAW NO.2476 OF 2008 IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2844 OF 2008 PETITION NO.2844 OF 2008 PETITION NO.2844 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.Vivek Kanthawala i/b.M/s.Vivek Kantawala & Co. for the Petitioners. Mr.Karl Tamboli i/b.Mr.D.H.Shah for the respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 18th October, 2008. : 18th October, 2008. : 18th October, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. In a disposed of petition, the petitioner/original landlord has taken out this civil application and the prayer is as under: "(a) that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to direct the trial court to curtail and restrict the cross examination in the RAE Suit no.316/498 of 2007 only to the matters in issue within the parameters/guidelines of judgment dated 29.9.2008 of this Hon’ble ( 2 ) Court and to complete the cross examination for the next session on 21.10.2008." The trial is still going on. The trial Judge is master is his trial. He needs to conduct the trial within the frame work of law. No court can interfere in such proceedings at the stage of cross-examination. The prayer as sought is impermissible. Present application is frivolous. It is dismissed/rejected rightly. The petition is dismissed. [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]