IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION {Cl NO Q g g) [2010 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF THE INDIA PETITIONER w‘“"‘ 05vK R1tesh / Kumar Gupta, S/o— Shri 0 “I igjvwkg. Ramesh Kumar Gupta, age about— {I (59(Yva 1.9mm 29 years, R/o—Behind Bus ‘ Stand, Manendra garh, Distt.— Koria (C.G.) VERSUS / G / 2. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, ‘Ambikapur, Surguja (C. G. ,. *“é‘ V' ‘ W" $t>i5§y RESPONDENTS 1. Regional Transport Authority Ambikapur, Surguja (C..) d ,V ) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (CI NO.2981 OF 2010 PETITIONER Ritesh Kumar Gupta Versus RESPONDENTS Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) & Another (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that on 26-1 0—2009 (Annexure P/2), the petitioner moved an application before the respondents for change of timing of regular stage carriage permit No. 01/B/ASP/2008, on the route Manendragarh to Kotadol via Kelhari, Janakpur and back one return trip daily. However, till date the same has not been decided by the respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide the said application expeditiously. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that application of the petitioner shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy a of this order. 4. In view of foregoing, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the application dated 26-10-2009 (Annexure P/2) filed by the petitioner within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid direction/ observation, this petition stands finally disposed'o'f. Sd/ I Satish K. Agnihotri ta I Judge //, ashok Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :— Shri Ansul R. Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this; 28'“ day of June, 2010)