IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.353 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Kurbaan S/o Shaukat ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: March 25, 2010 ____________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.70 of 2008 Under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 332, 336, 307, 393 and 427 of IPC and Section 3 of The Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act (Lok Sampatti Nivaran Adhiniyam), P.S. Pathri, District Haridwar ________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri S.K. Shandiliya, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Amit Bhatt, learned Additional G.A. for the State and also perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is not named in the FIR. No role has been assigned to him in the FIR and the specific role has been assigned to accused Tarik and Irshad only. It is further argued that the co-accused Gaje Singh @ Ajay and Jabbar, with similar role, have been granted bail by Sessions Judge, Haridwar vide order dated 5.7.2008 and the present applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. After considering all the facts and circumstances; on hearing learned counsel for the parties; on perusal of the contents of FIR and other papers available in file, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant-Kurbaan be released on bail on his executing personal bond and also on furnishing two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Haridwar. The bail application is disposed of. (Dharam Veer, J.) 25.03.2010 RG