^l^ 0?0, HIGHCOURT OF CKHATTBGARH AT BILASPUR WritPetitJon^No. 1934 of 2008 Petitioner Versus Respondents 1, Smt. Leeta Bai, W/o Shri Jyotish Kumar, Age about 39 years. Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary Schoot. Charghat, Block- Bemetara, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Education & Tribal Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur. (C.G.) Djstrict Education Officer, Bemetara. Distt. - Durg (C.G.) WRJT PETITOtN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONStrTUT!QN QF INDIA Singte Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Asnihotri. J. Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Smitha Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 1st day ofApril, 2008) The petitjoner was appointed (njtiajly. on a fixed pay of Rs. 500/-. The petitioner was thereafter, granted resular pay scate on completion of the probation period. The question of iaw involved herein is, asto whether the petitioner is entitted to regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of Jnitiat appointment or from the date of comptetion of probation period. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as tearned counsel appearing for the respondents/State, jointly submit that the facts and question of law, involved in the present writ petjtion, are the same asto that of in W. P. (S) No. 7002/2(X)6 Q'ogeshwar Prasad Patanwar Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others), which was disposed of vide order dated 15.12.2006. — - ^- ^ 4. In vlew of the above-stated submissfons made by teamed counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. petitjoner is entitted for regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of jnitjal appointment, subject to verjficatjon of the facts. No order asto costs. Thakur Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge