1 ao101.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 101 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6938 OF 2011 [ Shantilal s/o Lakhmichand Porwal vs. Sow. Rekha w/o Manoj @ Munnilal Porwal & Ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Babasaheb V. Wagh, Advocate for appellant/applicant. Mr. R.R. Karpe, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 25TH AUGUST, 2011 PER COURT : When this matter was heard for some time in the morning session, this Court orally expressed view that if this Court directs the trial Court to dispose of the Special Civil Suit No.38 of 2010 within four months, in that case, what is the 2 ao101.11 stand of the appellant. The matter was kept back. 2. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that, in stead of deciding this matter on merits, this Court may direct the trial Court to dispose of the Special Civil Suit No. 38 of 2010 within four months from today. 3. Accordingly, Appeal from Order and Civil Application stands disposed of, with direction to the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Shrirampur District Ahmednagar, to decide the Special Civil Suit No. 38 of 2010 within four months from today. . Needless to mention that, the interim order stands vacated. The order impugned in this Appeal from Order would operate till the disposal of the aforesaid 3 ao101.11 suit. Parties to the suit will co-operate the trial Court in the disposal of the said suit and will not ask for unnecessary adjournments unless there is an extraordinary circumstance to ask for same. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/AUG11