1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Appeal (MD)No.531 of 2011 R.Arunagiri ... Appellant/Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, D.M.S.compound, Teynampet, Chennai-600 006. 2.M.S.Nagarajan, Deputy Director of Public Health (Health Education Board), Director of Medical Services Campus, Teynampet, Chennai-600 006. ... Respondents/Respondents Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order of the learned Single Judge, dated 25.03.2011, made in W.P.(MD) No.415/2008. WP.No.415/2008 : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying this Court to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent in his proceedings in R.No.71854/E1/2007/S2 dated 17.09.2007 and quase the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondent to consider the petitioner to the post of Deputy Director P.H(HCB) by Promotion worth effect from the date on which his Junior was promoted with all monetary and service benefits. For Appellant : Mr.R.Singaravelan For Respondent-1 : Mr.K.Mahendran, Spl.Govt.Pleader. JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was delivered BY K.N.BASHA, J] Mr.R.Singaravelan, learned counsel for the appellant, would submit that subsequent to the filing of the writ appeal, the appellant sought for particulars as to the service particulars of the 2nd respondent under the Right to Information Act, and the Public Information Officer of the 1st respondent department has given service particulars of the 2nd respondent by letter dated 04.10.2011 with regard to the qualification of rival candidate, namely the 2nd respondent, and in view of the same the writ appeal may be disposed of giving liberty to the appellant to prefer a representation to the 1st respondent, as to the appointment of the rival candidate, based on the information given by the Public Information Officer as to his service particulars. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2.Heard the learned Special Government Pleader on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant. 3.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this court is constrained to dispose of the writ appeal permitting the appellant to prefer a representation to the 1st respondent herein, on the basis of the information he received under Right to Information Act as to the service particulars of the 2nd respondent, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4.With the above observation and direction, the writ appeal is disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) / True Copy / Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, D.M.S.compound, Teynampet, Chennai-600 006. 2.M.S.Nagarajan, Deputy Director of Public Health (Health Education Board), Director of Medical Services Campus, Teynampet, Chennai-600 006. Gb SR : 28.11.2011 : 2p/3c Judgment IN W.A.(MD)No.531/2011 Dated:16.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/