IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 2310 of 2011 (O&M) Gurcahran Singh and others .. Petitioners versus State of Punjab and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. S. S. Rangi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Rajesh Bindal, J. Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 8.9.2011 passed by the learned court below whereby the application filed by the prosecution for placing on record the statements of Harbans Singh son of Hari Ram of Village Jansla and Jarnail Singh son of Ami Chand of village Ugala and for including the name of Jarnail Singh in the list of prosecution witnesses has been accepted. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the prosecution could not be permitted to place on record any statement at this stage of the trial after the presentation of challan. No further investigation could continue. However, I do not find any merit in the submissions made. Section 311 Cr.P.C. gives ample powers to the Court to summon any witness found relevant. In the present case, the learned court below has merely permitted the prosecution to place on record the statements of Harbans Singh son of Hari Ram of Village Jansla and Jarnail Singh son of Ami Chand of village Ugala and including of name of Jarnail Singh in the list of prosecution witnesses, who will obviously appear as a witness in Court. The evidentiary value of their statements shall be considered by the court at the time of conclusion of trial. No prejudice as such has been caused to the petitioners at this stage. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. 3.11.2011 ( Rajesh Bindal ) vs Judge