wp9680-10.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9680 OF 2010 Sunil Babaji Satam .. Petitioner Versus Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai and Anr. .. Respondents Mrs.Neeta Karnik for petitioners Ms.Kavita Anchan i/b. M.V.Kini & Co. for respondent No.1. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 23rd JUNE 2011. P.C.: 1] The petitioner was an employee of Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai and certain events led to his dismissal. Therefore, a show cause notice seeking to evict him from the municipal quarters, came to be issued and, thereafter, an order of eviction was made. That was confirmed by the Appellate Authority. Hence, this petition. 2] During pendency of this petition, parties have amicably resolved the issue. The petitioner is reinstated in the wp9680-10.doc 2 service of the municipal corporation and the Advocate appearing on behalf of Corporation states that the petitioner will not be evicted from municipal quarters under his occupation but he has to pay rent for the period of his dismissal till the date of reinstatement. 3] Learned Advocate appearing for petitioners states that the petitioner has paid this amount. It is not for this Court to go into this controversy. The matter is disposed of in the light of the amicable settlement and the statement made on behalf of MCGM. Petition disposed off. No costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)