CWP(T) No.2359 of 2008. 05.03.2009 Present: None for the parties. The petitioner has assailed his suspension order dated 17.12.1990. It has come in the reply that he was arrested after registration of F.I.R. by the Chhota Shimla Police Station under Section 436 I.P.C. He was acquitted by the trial Court. However, the State had preferred an appeal before this Court. The respondent in reply to the supplementary affidavit has stated that the petitioner was reinstated on 27th March, 1997. Accordingly, the main grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Consequently, the present petition has become infructuous and the same is dismissed having infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. March 05, 2009. (sck)