IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4579 of 2011 BALESHWAR PRASAD SINHA, S/O LATE BHOLA PRASAD SINHA, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA GANESH LAL ROAD,NEAR JALAN HIGH SCHOOL, PATNA CITY P.O. BEGAMPUR, P.S. CHOWK, DIST. PATNA. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY,BIHAR,PATNA. 2. THE PRICNIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, GAYA. 5. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, WATER WAGE CICLE, GAYA. 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TILAIYA CANAL DIVISION, WAZIRGANJ, GAYA. 7. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, TILAIYA CANAL SUB-DIVISION, WAZIRGANJ, GAYA. 8. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. 9. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, GAYA. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 10.3.2011. Heard Shri Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Umesh Kumar, learned A.C. to G.P.1 appearing on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 7 and 9/State of Bihar and Shri Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.8/Accountant General. The petitioner, who superannuated with effect from 31.7.2007 from the post of Junior Engineer from Tilaiya Canal Division, Water Resource Department, Wazirganj, Gaya, has prayed for directing the respondents to fix the final pension and make payment of remaining amount of 2 G.P.F., Gratuity, Earned Leave and Group Insurance along with statutory interest. The petitioner has made specific statement in paragraph-5 of the petition that no departmental proceeding or any other proceeding was ever initiated against the petitioner at any point of time either in connection with his service or otherwise. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has also repeatedly filed representation before the concerned authority, even before the respondent no.2 i.e. Principal Secretary, Water Resource Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, however, till date, the grievances of the petitioner have not been redressed. In view of statement made in paragraph-5 of the writ petition as well as the fact that petitioner superannuated long back on 31.7.2007, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent nos.2, 6, 8 and 9 within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, all the respondents, particularly respondent nos.2, 3 6, 8 and 9 are directed to examine the same and pass appropriate order redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. The respondents are further directed to take all steps to clear all the admitted dues within three months from the date of filing of such representation. The petitioner shall also be entitled to get admissible statutory interest on delayed payment. In case of refusal, the respondent nos.2, 6, 8 and 9 are directed to pass a speaking order within three months from the date of filing of such representation. With aforesaid observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)