IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH JANUARY 2011 / 29TH POUSHA 1932 OP.No. 11726 of 2003(U) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- N.RAVINDRAN, S/O.NARAYANAN, THOONETH VADAKKETHIL, PATHIYOOR WEST, KAREELAKULANGARA.P.O., KAYAMKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.R.VENKETESH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE KAYAMKULAM MUNICIPALITY,KAYAMKULAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. SECRETARY,KAYAMKULAM MUNICIPALITY, KAYAMKULAM. R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.K.HARILAL THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/01/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts OP.NO.11726/2003 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE ORDER BEARING NO.P8-10751/02 DATED 2/11/2002 OF THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION. P2 COPY OF THE ORDER NO.A3-111/2002 DATED 26/11/2002 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ O.P. No.11726/2003-U ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 19th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner retired from service of the Municipality as Daffedar on 31/07/2002. 2. By Ext.P1 order, the retirement benefits were sanctioned by the Director of Municipal Administration. Thereafter, the Secretary of the Municipality by Ext.P2 issued sanction for payment. It is evident from Ext.P2 that the total amount fixed as D.C.R.G is Rs.86,319/-. It is pointed out in the writ petition that out of the total amount of Rs.83,907/- payable on D.C.R.G, an amount of Rs.50,000/- was paid just before filing of the writ petition. 3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the Municipality also. 4. In terms of the sanction orders, if any further amount is payable to the petitioner, steps will O.P. No.11726/2003 -:2:- be taken in the matter and the remaining amount, if any, will be disbursed expeditiously. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner then submitted that the arrears of D.A from 1997 have also not been paid. It is upto the petitioner to file appropriate representation before the Secretary of the Municipality who will consider it, after due verification as to whether payment is effected, and pay further amounts if any due to the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms O.P. No.11726/2003 -:3:- T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ O.P. No.11726/2003-U ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ J U D G M E N T 19th January, 2011