IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1310 of 2010 1. NAND KISHORE SHARMA SON OF LATE TILAKDHARI SHARMA, AT PRESENT WORKING AS VICE CHANCELLOR, KAMESHWAR SINGH DARBHANGA SANSKRIT UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA. 2. MANOJ KUMAR SON OF RAMWARTH PRASAD, EX- CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, KAMESHWAR SINGH DARBHANGA SANSKRIT UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA, LECTURER, DEPARTMENT OF SANSKRIT, B.R. AMBEDKAR BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZUFFARPUR. 3. SUBODH KUMAR JHA SON OF LATE KAMLA KANT JHA S.D.O. EXAMINATION AT PRESENT POSTED AS LECTURER, RAMAAUTA GAUTAM SANSKRIT COLLEGE, AHILYA ASTHAN, DARBHANGA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DARBHANGA. 3. SHRI K.K. PATHAK SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, NEW SECRETARIATE, PATNA 4. SHRI JAY CHANDRA PRASAD SRIVASTAVA, SON OF LATE KAMESHWAR PRASAD SRIVASTAVE, RESIDENT OF NARKATIYAGANJ, POLICE STATION SIKARPUR, DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN AT PRESENT POSTED AS REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, DARBHANGA. ----------- 02. 21.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The grievance of the petitioners is that pursuant to the order of this court vide order dated 06.09.2010 passed in Cr. W.J.C. No. 641 of 2010, as contained in annexure- 2, this court gave opportunity to place their case before the Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga to look into the matter and examine the 2 same so that the investigation of L.N.M.U P.S. Case No. 126 of 2010 carried out to its logical conclusion. The court had allowed six weeks time to enable the petitioners to put their case before the Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga either themselves through any of the representation subject to investigation having not already been concluded finally and in the meantime, it was directed that no coercive steps be taken against the petitioners for a period of six weeks Mr. Rajendra Prasad Singh, Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioner had gone to the Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga for placing the relevant materials in their support, however, the same were not entertained with the result they could not produce their materials. Mr. Shyam Kishore sharma, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the State submits that the averments made in the writ application are not specific since the Superintendent of Police Darbhanga is duty bound to entertain the petitioners in light of the order of this court as contained in annexure- 2. Considering the submission of the parties, the petitioners are given another opportunity to place their case before the Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga on or before 21.01.2011 in his office. 3 It goes without saying that as per the previous order of this court (Annexure-2), in case any materials are produced by the petitioners, the Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga will look into the matter and examine the same so that the investigation may be carried out to its logical conclusion, if not already concluded. No coercive steps be taken against the petitioners till 21.01.2011. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with L.N Mithila University P.S. Case No. 126 of 2010 and 150 of 2010 through fax at the cost on being deposited by the petitioner. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)