IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19750 of 2010 Niranjan Kumar Sinha, son of Awadhesh Kumar Lal, Resident of Village- Banhara, P.S. Barauni, District-Begusarai. ……Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ………………………….Opposite Party. For the petitioner :- Mr. Suraj Narain Pd. Sinha, Sr.Advocate. Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate. For the informant :- Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Advocate. ----------- 2. 21. 06. 2010. Heard the parties. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 379, 323 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code as also under Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. According to the prosecution case, the petitioner was married with the informant in the year 2004. There is allegation of demand of dowry and torture against the petitioner in the F.I.R. vide Annexure-1. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as a matter of fact, the petitioner had previously filed a Matrimonial Suit for seeking divorce and thereafter, the present case vide Annexure-1 was filed. On close of investigation of the present case, Police has submitted Final Report vide Annexure-2 finding entire prosecution allegation to be false. However, learned C.J.M. disagreed with the Police report and took cognizance. Learned counsel for the informant as also the State have strongly opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail made on behalf of the petitioner, but have not disputed the aforesaid factual position. 2 Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly in view of submission of the Final Report vide Annexure-2, in the event of his arrest/surrender in connection with Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 165 of 2008 within a period of four weeks from today, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Begusarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. It goes without saying that the informant shall be at liberty to take legal recourse for her maintenance and other relief in the Matrimonial Suit, which is stated to be still pending. m.p. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)