IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 34003 of 2009(O) -------------------------- OS.72/1991 of MUNI-MAGI.COURT,PERINTHALMANNA .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- V.P.YUSUF HAJI, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O.KUNHIMARAKKAR, VALIYA PEEDIYAKKAL, ARAKKAPARAMB, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN SRI.PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR SMT.VANDANA MENON SMT.ANJU P.NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. MUHAMMAD ISAQ HAJI, S/O.VALIYA PEEDIYAKKAL ABDUL KHADAR HAJI, ARAKKAPARAMB AMSOM DESOM, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. SAMEERA, D/O.VALIYA PEEDIYAKKAL MOIDUTTY HAJI, ARAKKAPARAMB AMSOM DESOM, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. FAISI, D/O.VALIYA PEEDIYAKKAL MOIDUTTY HAJI, ARAKKAPARAMB AMSOM DESOM, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, 4. FATHIMA SARIN, D/O.VALIYA PEEDIYAKKAL MOIDUTTY HAJI, ARAKKAPARAMB AMSOM DESOM, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, 5. MAMMAD @ BAPPU, S/O.KUNHIMARAKKAR, VALIYA PEEDIYAKKAL, ARAKKAPARAMB AMSOM DESOM,PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 6. V.P.USMAN @ KUNHIPPA HAJI, S/O.KUNHIMARAKKAR, VALIYA PEEDIYAKKAL, ARAKKAPARAMB, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.34003 OF 2009 -------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of November 2009 ---------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a petition seeking review of Ext.P6 order passed by the learned Munsiff on the objections raised over the commission report obtained in the suit. None of the objections raised by the plaintiffs have been considered by the learned Munsiff in Ext.P6 order and so much so, seeking a review of Ext.P6 order, according to the counsel, is the proper way to be followed rather than challenging Ext.P6 order by way of a writ petition invoking the visitorial jurisdiction of this court. Reserving the right of the petitioner to move a review petition as desired, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE //TRUE COPY// vdv P.A TO JUDGE