1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.215 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.227 OF 2005 Sahadev Co-op.Housing Society Ltd. ..Appellants. V/s. Nahalchand Laloochand Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondents. WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.216 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.283 OF 2005 Bheem Co-op.Housing Society Ltd. ..Appellants. V/s. Nahalchand Laloochand Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondents. WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.222 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.212 OF 2005 Panchali Co-op.Housing Society Ltd. ..Appellants. V/s. Nahalchand Laloochand Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondents. Mr. S.G.Karandikar for appellants. Mr.Pravind Sawdhani with Mr.Birendra Saraf i/b M/s.Prakash & Co. for respondents. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : APRIL 5, 2006. DATE : APRIL 5, 2006. DATE : APRIL 5, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard. 2 2. As the appellants have suffered the order passed by the trial court since December, 2004 and at this distance of time, I see no merit in entertaining the present appeal against the said interlocutory order. Instead, ends of justice will be met, if the trial court is directed to expedite the hearing of the suit, which is still pending before the lower court. As these appeals are not pressed, the same are dismissed. 3. Trial Court is directed to expedite hearing of the suits as High Court expedited cases, to be finally disposed of preferably by end of December, 2006. 4. It is made clear that if there are any older matters pending before the concerned trial court already expedited by the High Court or the Supreme Court the trial Judge will give precedence to those matters while keeping in mind that these suits will have to be disposed of expeditiously. 5. All questions are left open to be decided at the trial on its own merits in accordance with the law.