1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.8078 OF 2005 Shri N. D. Mokal. ...Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. S. H. Hushing with Mr.Kiran Kanpile for the Petitioner. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the Respondents. ..... CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, J. AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. January 9, 2006. P.C. The Respondent-State, in reply, has set out that the Petitioner has alternate remedy to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The impugned order is in the nature of punishment imposed on the Petitioner and considering that, the Petitioner has alternate remedy of filing appropriate proceedings before the MAT. If the Petitioner files an Original Application within 30 days from today, on behalf of the State learned AGP makes a statement that the State will not raise any objection as to limitation. Statement accepted. The Tribunal to hear the Original Application if filed within that period. With the above, the Petition 2 stands disposed of. ( F.I. Rebello, J.) (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)