IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4774 of 1993 ====================================================== Ram Swaroop Singh .... .... Petitioner Versus Ramadhar Singh & Ors .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Pushkar Nath Singh, Advocate Ms. Mallika Mazumadar, Advocate Ms. Shabda Verma, Advocate For the Respondent No.1 : Mr. Din Bandhu Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI ORAL ORDER 11 22-05-2015 Heard Mr. Pushkar Nath Singh, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner and, Mr. Din Bandhu Singh, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent no.1. It is submitted on behalf of the writ petitioner that the submission, recorded in the order, dated 01.04.2015, to the effect, “that the parties of this case have already died, and, the legal representatives of the parties have not been substituted, this writ petition stands abated” was not made by Mr. Pushkar Nath Singh, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, but by Mr. Din Bandhu Singh, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, it is directed that in the order, dated 01.04.2015, the expression, “Mr. Pushkar Nath Singh, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Patna High Court CWJC No.4774 of 1993 (11) dt.22-05-2015 2/2 the petitioner” shall stand corrected and be, henceforth, read as “Mr. Din Bandhu Singh, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1”. Pawan/- (I. A. Ansari, J) U