Patna High Court CWJC No.15269 of 2011 (3) dt.09-11-2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15269 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Manju Devi @ Manju Kumari W/O Late Arun Kumar R/O Mohalla- Hanuman Nagar, Mustafa Bada, P.S.- Rampur, P.O.- G.P.O. Gaya, Distt.- Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank Through Its Chairman Head Officer At Meena Plaza, South Of Museum, Patna-800001 2. The Chairman, Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank, Meena Plaza, South Of Museum, Patna- 800001 3. Regional General Manager, Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank Controlling Office Ramanuj Bhawan, 371, A.P. Colony, P.O.- G.P.O. Gaya Town, P.S.- Rampur, Distt.- Gaya 4. Branch Manager, Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank Bishnuganj Branch, Bishnuganj, P.S.- Mkdumpur, Distt.- Jahanabad .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Respondent/s : Mr. Mahesh Narayan Parbat. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL) 3 09-11-2011 Heard both sides. This Court is at loss to appreciate the prayer made in the present application as culled out in paragraph No. 1 which read as under: “1. That this application is for issuance a writ in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the respondents to appoint the petitioner on compassionate ground on the any available post in the Respondent Bank as the petitioner’s husband died in harness on 28.7.2006 on the post of Clerk-cum- Cashier posted in the Bishnuganj Branch Bishnuganj of the respondent Bank or issue such appropriate writ/writs, direction/directions or pass such other Patna High Court CWJC No.15269 of 2011 (3) dt.09-11-2011 order or orders which your Lordships deem fit and proper.” Earlier, petitioner being the widow of the deceased employee of the Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank (for short “ the Bank”) had moved this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 975 of 2007 which was considered and disposed of by order dated 16.7.2010 (Annexure-7). In view of the stand taken by the petitioner and the order passed by this Court on C.W.J.C. No. 975 of 2007, the present application seems to be misconceived. Mr. Parbat, learned counsel for the respondent Bank states that all pending claims are now required to be considered in the light of new Model Scheme adopted by the respondent Bank. It is accordingly dismissed. PANKAJ KUMAR/- (Kishore K. Mandal, J)