CRP 72/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HN SARMA Heard Mr. I. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. J. Singh, lea rned Sr. counsel appearing for the respondents Railways. The subject matter of challenge in this revision petition is the order dated 26.2.10 by which the learned Addl. District Judge (FTC No.1), Kam rup, Guwahati being the appellate forum under Section 9 of the Public Premises ( Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants)Act, 1971 fixed the case for interim prayer of the petitioner on 10.03.10 without providing any ad-interim protection to the petitioner. The petitioner having served with the copy of notice dated 8.2.10 u nder Section 5 of the Act to vacate the public premises within fifteen days, fil ed a Misc. Appeal No. 4.10 before the learned appellate court which was admitte d on 26.2.10 for hearing. On the prayer of the petitioner for ad-interim injunct ion restraining the respondents from evicting the petitioner in terms of the imp ugned notice dated 8.2.10, the learned appellate court issued notice thereon as indicated above. The grievance of the petitioner is that in the meantime if the p etitioner is evicted, it will cause irreparable loss and injury and for all prac tical purposes it would render infractuous. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner this revisio n petition is taken up to-day itself for final disposal with certain orders sinc e the matter is in session before the learned appellate court fixing the same on 10. 3.10 i.e., tomorrow. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case as it appears in this case, this revision petition is finally disposed with the direction tha t till the disposal of the Misc. Case No. 103/10, status quo as regards the poss ession of the petitioner over the public premises in question be maintained by t he parties. With this order, this revision petition stands finally disposed of.