IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.19854-M of 2010 Date of Decision:8.9.2010 Chandni and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. H.S. Batth, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, A.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) In pursuance to the order dated 14.7.2010, reply of Puran Chand HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police (HQ) Sirsa on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 has been filed. In para 1 of the preliminary submission, it is submitted that petitioner No.1. Chandni was got medically examined by a board of Doctors including Radiologist, Physician and Dental Surgeon. The result of the medical examination as declared by the Board of Doctors is that the age of petitioner No.1 is between 18 to 19 years. This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for seeking directions to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 by way of providing adequate security. The petitioners are present in the Court. The Superintendent of Police, Sirsa, has already been directed vide order dated 14.7.2010 to look into the threat perception and take necessary measures, if need be. Disposed f accordingly. 8.9.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE