IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 5844 of 2009 Between: Pilli Anjaneyulu Yadav S/o.P.Chittaiah Yadav H.No.716 Old Malkajgiri Ranga Reddy District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner Greater Hyderbad Municipal Corporation Tank Bund Hyderabad 2 The Deputy Commissioner Greater Hyderbad Municipal Corporation Makajgiri Hyderabad 3 Communist Party of India, Rep. by is State Secretary, B.V. Raghavulu, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring inaction of the 1 and 2 in not taking any action against the 3rd respondent supporters for making illegal and unauthorized construction of the pucca houses in the site admeasuring Ac. 19.12 gts., in Sy.No. 418,419, 420, 421, 403 situated at Moulali Village, Ranga Reddy District pursuant to the representation submitted by the petitioner on 24- 2-2009 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequentially direct the respondents 1 and 2 to demolish the unauthorized constructions made bythe 3rd respondent supporters herein. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.CHANDRA SHEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: R.RADHA KRISHNA REDDY(SC FOR GHMC,SNCZONE) The Court made the following : ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondent – Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad. The main grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that even though he made a representation to respondents 1 and 2 on 24.2.2009 to take action against the supporters of the 3rd respondent – Communist Party of India for making illegal and unauthorized constructions in the land admeasuring Ac.19.12 guntas in Sy.No.418, 49, 420, 421 and 403 situated at Moulali Village, Ranga Reddy District, the respondents have so far no initiated any action. Even though time is granted to the learned standing counsel for the respondent Corporation on 20.3.2009, no instructions are reported in the matter. However, it is submitted that since the representation of the petitioner is still pending consideration with the respondent authorities, instead of this court going into the merits of the matter, the respondents may be directed to consider and take necessary action, for which the learned counsel for the petitioner also agreed. In the circumstances, without going into the merits of the matter, respondents 1 and 2 are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.3.2009 and take necessary action after issuing notice and opportunity to the affected parties. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. N.V.RAMANA,J Dt.31.3.2009 msv