1 cri-appln-523-10 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 523 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2414 OF 2005 Indur Kartar Chhugani .. Applicant Vs. 1. The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents Mr. S. D. Paithane for applicant. Mr. P. A. Pol, PP for State. Ms. Tasneem Zariwala i/by Mr. Pankaj Vijayan for respondent nos.5 to 9 and 17, 18. Mr. P. P. Tipnis i/by M/s. Consulta Juris for respondent nos.10 to 14 and 16. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U. D. SALVI, JJ. JANUARY 05, 2011. P.C. We have heard Mr. Paithane, the learned counsel for the applicant. We have perused our order dated 9/9/2009 and the subsequent order passed by the Apex Court on 11/12/2009 in SLP (Cri) No. 9120 of 2009. It is evident that our order sought to be recalled in this 2 cri-appln-523-10 application was a subject matter of challenge before the Apex Court in SLP (Cri) No. 9120 of 2009 and the same came to be dismissed on 11/12/2009. The order passed by the Apex Court reads thus, “We do not find ground to interfere. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed.” We do not find any reason to reconsider the applicant’s prayer for being heard without complying with the conditions set out in our order dated 9/9/2009 and hence this application must fail. The application is hereby rejected. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)