IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 5475 of 2010. Decided on: 6th September, 2010. G.C. Thakur. …Petitioner. Versus H.P. General Industries Corporation Ltd. … Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh,, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramesh Kaundal, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Dinesh Thakur, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(i). That the respondent Corporation may kindly be issued a writ of mandamus directing to pay the legal charges (professional fee) payable to the advocate engaged by the petitioner to defend his case before the Inquiry Officer i.e. Commissioner Departmental Enquiries.” 2. It is submitted that even the undisputed amounts due to the petitioner like leave encashment etc. are not given. There will be a direction to the respondent to release to the petitioner due and admissible amounts, which are not under dispute within a period of one month from today. As far as legal aid is concerned, it will be open to the petitioner to approach the District Legal Services Authority concerned, in which case the said authority will examine the entitlement and take appropriate action. 3. The writ petition is disposed of as above, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 6th September, 2010 ( Justice Kuldip Singh), (tr) Judge.