IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16916 of 2008 PROF.ABDUS SAMI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.2075 of 2009 JADU NANDAN MAHTON Versus PATNA UNIVERSITY & ORS with CWJC No.3670 of 2009 DR.DHARMENDRA PATI TRIPATHI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.4270 of 2009 DR.SHREE NARAIN SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.16678 of 2008 DR.INDRADEO SINGH Versus THE VEER KUNWAR SINGH UNIVERSITY & ORS. with CWJC No.17552 of 2008 DR.PRABHA PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.18002 of 2008 DR.RAJIVA RANJAN PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.18165 of 2008 RAM PRAVESH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.4154 of 2009 PROF.MAHENDRA PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.7794 of 2008 DR.KAPILDEO TIWARI Versus THE VIR KUER SINGH UNIVERSITY & ORS. with CWJC No.10465 of 2008 DR.NAND KISHORE TIWARI Versus THE VEER KUNWAR SINGH UNIVERSITY & ORS. with CWJC No.12673 of 2008 DR.SHAMBHU SHARAN Versus THE VEER KUNWAR SINGH UNIVERSITY & ANR. with CWJC No.9299 of 2008 2 HIRANAND PANDEY Versus THE V.C.,VEER KUNWAR SINGH UNIVERSITY & ORS. with CWJC No.19016 of 2008 JANARDAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.1470 of 2009 RAMAKWAL SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.6470 of 2009 TAHZIBE HASHMI Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY & ORS. with CWJC No.19091 of 2008 RAMBHA DEVI Versus THE B.N.MANDAL UNIVERSITY & ORS. with CWJC No.4843 of 2009 RITA SINGH Versus B.N.MANDAL UNIVERSITY & ORS. with CWJC No.8227 of 2009 KARUNA KUMAR JHA Versus THE V.C.,B.N.MANDAL UNIVERSITY & ORS. with CWJC No.18788 of 2008 BIRENDRA PRASAD SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 1.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-Universities as well as the State. Since all these writ applications relate to the payment of the retiral dues, with consent of the parties, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The grievances of the petitioners in these writ applications are with regard to the payment of retiral dues as also 3 certain other dues, which, according to the petitioners, have not been settled till date despite requests causing financial hardship to them. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective respondent-Universities submit that the grievances of the petitioners shall be considered as per law without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that although the petitioners have requested the concerned authorities of the respective Universities for settling their claims, but for expeditious disposal of their pending claims, the petitioners propose to file their separate representation before the Registrar of the concerned Universities stating distinctly all their unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks from today. In case such separate representations are filed, the grievances of the petitioners raised in their respective representations shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representations, so that the grievances raised in their respective representations may be settled without delay and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. Upon consideration, however, if any of the claims or part of the claims raised by the petitioners in their representations is found not admissible under the rules, the same shall be informed to the concerned petitioners with the reasons thereof. Such communication shall be made to the petitioners by post under 4 registered cover. All the above writ applications stand disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)