- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1556 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3111 OF 2008 ... Shri Suresh Chintaman Joshi ...Petitioner v/s. The Chief Officer, Chiplun Nagar Parishad & ors. ...Respondents ... Ms.P.A.Birje for the Petitioner. Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, AGP for State. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: 29TH JULY, 2008 P.C.: Heard the learned Counsel for both sides. Civil Application is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) - 2 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3111 OF 2008 ... Shri Suresh Chintaman Joshi ...Petitioner v/s. The Chief Officer, Chiplun Nagar Parishad & ors. ...Respondents ... Ms.P.A.Birje for the Petitioner. Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, AGP for State. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: 29TH JULY, 2008 P.C.: By this petition the Petitioner is claiming a direction to the Respondent that the land of the Petitioner is no more reserved for public purpose in - 3 - the development plan, because the Petitioner served a notice under Section 127 of the Town Planning Act. The Petitioner relies on the notice dated 14-4-1998. 2. Perusal of that notice shows that that notice cannot be termed as notice served under Section 127. By notice issued under Section 127, the land owner requires to call upon the authority to acquire the land for public purpose for which it is reserved. Perusal of the notice dated 14-4-1998 shows that instead of calling upon the authority to acquire the land, the Petitioner is telling the authority that his land cannot be acquired. 3. In this view of the matter,therefore, we do not see any substance in the petition. It is rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)