IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH: HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDA RAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1107 OF 2010 BETWEEN: Jangaiah S/o.Mogulaiah …. Petitioner AND Smt. Premlatha W/o. Jagaiah and others …. Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDA RAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1107 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: This revision is filed by husband of the first respondent and father of the minor second respondent questioning award of maintenance to the respondents 1 and 2 @ Rs.1,500/- per month and Rs.1,000/- per month, respectively, under Section 125 Cr.P.C. by the Judge, Family Court, Mahabubnagar in M.C. No.14 of 2009. 2. The second respondent is a minor girl studying second class and she has no means to maintain herself. The lower Court concluded that as per Ex.P-4 it is evident that the petitioner married second wife. Therefore, it is good and valid ground for the first respondent to live separately from the petitioner and claim maintenance for herself. The second respondent is naturally residing with the first respondent. Even though the first respondent is stated to have functioned as Councilor of Mahabubnagar Municipality for some time, no evidence could be produced in the lower Court to show that there was any income for her. 3. On the other hand, it is stated by the petitioner’s counsel that the petitioner is working as a masonry coolie and he has no fixed income. Amount of maintenance awarded by the lower Court works out at Rs.50/- per day for the first respondent and at Rs.33/- per day for the second respondent / minor. 4. Having regard to all the circumstances of the case and finding on facts on the basis of the evidence arrived at by the lower Court, this Court does not find any valid or legal reasons to interfere with the order passed by the lower Court. 5. Hence, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. ___________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDA RAJULU, J June 16, 2010. KTL