IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 86 OF 2006 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 944 OF 2004 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2369 OF 2004 GAJANAN JAGANNATH MADYE & ANR. ...PETITIONERS V/S HEMANT DIGAMBAR MULAY ...RESPONDENTS MS. TRUPTI NAIK I/B S.S. REDIJ FOR PETITIONERS. NONE FOR THE RESPONDENTS. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. DATE : 8th DATE : 8th DATE : 8th December,2006 December,2006 December,2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard. The contempt petition is filed alleging that the Respondents have not paid the amount as per the consent terms on the basis of which the decree was passed. The Petitioner has the remedy to take out Execution proceedings for recovery of the amount. However, the petitioners have not shown anything beyond non payment of the amount as agreed in the consent terms. Therefore, there is no contempt. The contempt petition stands disposed of. --- (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.)