IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42410 of 2009 RAGHU NANDAN TANTI, S/o Late Panchu Tanti. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 04.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that one month after the occurrence the complainant filed the complaint alleging therein that his married daughter and widowed niece were kidnapped by the accused persons but there is no explanation as to why no report was given to the police earlier, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 30.03.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Songheshwar P.S. Case No. 101 of 2008 (S.T. No. 132 of 2009) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That - 2 - one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)