1 ABA-85.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.85 OF 2011 Farhad Homi Unwala .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent S/Shri Shirish Gupte, Senior Counsel with P.M. Rustomkhan for the Applicant. Ms P.P. Bhosale, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: FEBRUARY 08, 2011 P.C: 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a person who apprehends arrest in Crime No.290 of 2010 registered with Loni-Kalbhor Police Station, Pune. The co- accused have been admitted to anticipatory bail by the order dated 15-9-2010, passed on Criminal Application Nos.3809 of 2010 with Criminal Application No.3825 of 2010. The role of the present applicant cannot be distinguished from that of the accused who have been admitted to bail. In view of this, the application is allowed. In the event of his arrest the applicant be released on bail in the afore-stated crime number on his furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- with one or 2 ABA-85.11 more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs.40,000/- on the condition that the applicant shall report at the police station concerned on 15-2-2010 at 11:00 a.m. for interrogation and thereafter as and when required by the I.O.. The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and he shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the trial Court. 2. This order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge-sheeted, the applicant may furnish fresh bond before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, dated 2-12-2010, delivered in Criminal Appeal No.2271 of 2010, arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 7615 of 2009 {Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.}. 3. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)