IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 16961 of 2008 Between: M/s. Mohan's Wood Works A Regd. Partnership Firma, Registered Under the Indian Partnership Act 1932, Plot No.18, Industrial Development Area, Phase-I, Cherlapally, Hyderabad, Rep.by its Managing Partner Sri R.J. Mohan Rao ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Project Director, Rajiv Vidya Mission (SSA) Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Joint Collector and Additional District Magistrate Office of the District Collector, Hyderabad District, Station Road, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3 The Project Officer, Rajiv Vidya Mission (SSA) Block -M3 , Manoranjitam Complex, Near Ajanta Gate, Exhibition Ground, Hyderabad. 4 M/s. NCCF of India Ltd., 4-1-1240/1, King Koti Road, Hyderabad. 5 M/s. Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Ltd., Prime Division, Lara-1, Land Mark, 5-4-94 to 97, M.G. Road, Secunderabad. 6 M/s.ERGO MAXX (India) Private Limited, 80, Memgambakkam High Road, Chennai-600 034 7 M/s. Kawas Funitures C & B ICS Ltd., Show Room 1 & 2 Housing Board Complex, Near Ajanta Gate, M.J. Market Road, Hyderabad. ..... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents Nos. 1 to 3 in rejecting the technical bid of the petitioner filed pursuant to the tender notice No. 634/RVN(SSA)/HYD/2008 and further accepting the technical bids of the respondent Nos. 4 to 7 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to accept the technical bid of the petitioner and evaluate the tenders in terms of the tender conditions as prescribed in the tender notice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SRINIVAS DAMMALAPATI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No.16961 of 2008 ORDER: Since the tenders pursuant to the impugned tender notice were already finalized, nothing survives for adjudication on merits at this point of time. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner intends to work out the remedies available under law so far as the irregularities committed by the respondents in inviting the tenders. Accordingly, granting leave and liberty to the petitioner to work out the appropriate remedy available under law for redressal of his grievance, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ____________ G.ROHINI, J Dt.03.06.2009 PN/RNS