IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16347 of 2008 BACHU SINGH @ PAPPU KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 2.5.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is an accused in a case under sections 302/34 and 120B of the Penal Code. Earlier the petitioner’s prayer for bail was rejected on 19.9.2007. The informant is not the eye witness. During investigation one Saroj who has a Gumti shop stated that he was at his shop when he saw the accused persons and the deceased. After some time while he was returning from the market, he heard the sound of firing and saw Bachchu Singh and Guddu Singh armed with pistol and one unknown person was accompanying them. On the basis of this fact it has been alleged that they were responsible for the killing. Considering the evidence of Saroj Singh I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. This bail petition is dismissed. The court below may take steps to expedite the trial of the case. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)