IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-7042 of 2009 Date of decision : 06.05.2009 Nirmal Singh ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana and another ....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Sukhdeep S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG Punjab. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to order dated 16.03.2009, passed by this court, petitioner has already appeared before the trial court and furnished the bail bonds. Learned counsel also emphasizes that the present complaint was lodged by Sukhvinder Kaur, due to the fact that the petitioner had earlier lodged an FIR against her. Learned counsel for the State submits that it being a complaint case it is not possible for him to state whether the petitioner has furnished the bail bonds pursuant to order dated 16.03.2009. However, in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, order dated 16.03.2009, passed by this Court is hereby made absolute. In case the assertion made by learned counsel for the petitioner is found to be incorrect, the State and/or complainant shall be at liberty to move and appropriate application before this Court. 06.05.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE