IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-32893 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 20, 2009 Roop Singh and another … Petitioners Versus The State of Punjab and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present : Mr. K.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioners. ****** S.D. Anand, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners would be content if a direction is issued to respondent Nos.2 and 3, to give notice under Section 160 Cr.P.C. to the petitioners in case they are required for the investigation of a case. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. B.B.S.Teji, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. The petitioner shall stand disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 (Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar and S.H.O., Police Station Chhehrata, District Amritsar) to give notice under Section 160 Cr.P.C. to the petitioners if they are required for the investigation of a case. This order would be operative for a period of three months from today. A copy of the order be given to the learned State counsel under the signatures of Special Secretary. November 20, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vinod Judge