.< "7 ^^- BEFOKE THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF JIJDICATURE AT BILA8PUR INTHEMATTEROF WORKMEN COMPENSATION ACT M.A_ ,. 03 •KUMARSAHLJ27YRS. ^ S/OSHRISEVARAMSAHLJ, R/0 VILLAGE SE^IARIYA[G1RH3LA] POST-SEIA^RIYA, TAffiIL & CIST- DJRG CG VERSUS ^:Ms K1RAN INEXJSTRY ^ 'n^ESOUaHFROFRHTCR, StVl HARffiAJAN SIN3H RING ROADN0.2, TATIBANEH EiST-RAIPURCO. / 2.ADCITEONAL COMMISSICNER, APPELLANT /APPUCANT ^". ^rt.>- rrv<^i> ry ®:-*' ..•• .<s3^-""" ,^y^ ^v"y" LAB3UROCURTRAIPIRC.G,.........RE§PONDENT/NON-APPLICANT APPEAL U/S 30 OF WORKMEN COMPENSATION ACT APFEAL VALUED OF RS. 96106.50^^" BlfS' 'sia ii"X!-HC—78 sni^^tf^fw •W -HT^T WV Oop a> ^°T '<.11<)1<?1'11, (9Tll-H'tio, 'f^RTRTy ^A • \QS, . •</0 2y^-2- sn^i 'q^q? (1pf3<?str) ^iTwglrosn^T S.B.: Hon'bl^Shri Justice Prashantl 1-10.2010 No one appears for the appjellant. Shri H.B.Agrawal, Senior AjJvocate with Smt. Meera Jaiswal, counsel for respondent No.1. |over once in absence of any even in the second call. is no other option left with the [;ellaneous appeal for want of The matter was passed representation on behalf of the a^pellant. No one appears for the appjellant In the circumstance, there] Court but to dismiss the mis( prosecution. The miscellaneous appejal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge *i«ik'!<fl-<Tfi^x fs^zt <r<ii*<;i< •^siraiisn^i Kumar Mishra