IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12349 of 2010 SUBHASH KUMAR RAI @ SUBHASH RAI SON OF SRI RAM PUKAR RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BAIRAMPUR, P.S. BIRAUL, DISTRICT- DARBHANGA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . 2 21.04.2010 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the date mentioned in paragraph 7 of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State. The petitioner had earlier approached this Court for grant of anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No. 37969 of 2008 which was rejected as the order dated 28.11.2008 (Annexure-1). It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been roped into this case on false allegations, and as a matter of fact, petitioner was willing to keep the complainant however it was she who was not interested in living with this petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner also filed the Matrimonial Case No. 106 of 2006 for restitution of the conjugal rights which was allowed by Family Court, Darbhanga vide order dated 25th February, 2009. Learned counsel has produced the certified copy of the aforesaid order which has been kept on record. Considering the facts and circumstances of the - 2 - case, it is directed that in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Roshra (Samastipur) in connection with Complaint Case No. 370 of 2005. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)