IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 22 of 2008 Vinod Kumar …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and another …… Respondents …….. Mr.Rajendra Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nandan Arya, Asstt. Govt. Advocate for the State. Mr. Pramod Tiwari, Advocate for respondent no. 2. ………. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C. J. CRMA No. 453 of 2008 Through the medium of this joint application signed by the petitioner and respondent no. 2 as well as their counsel supported by the individual affidavits of the petitioner and respondent no. 2, it has been prayed that since the parties have compromised, the offence U/s 498A I.P.C. be compounded. 2. For the reasons stated, the application is allowed because of the compromise between the parties. The offence is compounded with all the consequences including the consequence of the quashing of the proceedings in Criminal Case No. 5041 of 2007; State Vs. Vinod Kumar. 3. The petition U/s 482 Cr.P.C. stands disposed of. (V. K. Gupta, C. J.) 18.06.2008 A