^- o^c ±- III THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATTO2B AT BII,A8PVR fC.Gt. WRIT PBTITION N0. ^45^0F 2004 .^ PETITION^?: ^ \.<>><y;'' ^^.^ ' ^^'f^ .^'^y -y^\^" ••^•s",.> ^ .\'0"' <?•^' .<^" ^i ^ESPQNDENTS: o' ^ d^ y Madan Lal, S/o Shri Man^lu Ram j^ed about 48 years, R/o \^llage: Balod Gahan, Tehsil: Gurur, Distt. Dmg( C.G.). - Versua - 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Ttoough: The Secretaiy^ RibMc Wortes Department, D.K.S. Bhawan^ Raipur, Chhatttegarh. 2. Executive Biq@bn^er, National Highway Dhrision No,l, Public Worfes Departroent, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3< Sub Divisional Officer, National Highway Sub Dlvision, Pablic Works Departinent, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION VJXDEEt ARTICI^B 226/227 OF THE COIffSTXTUTIOir OF IHDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPl Wiit^etition No.^45 jof 2004 1»^ l%it ^ Petitioner Madaa Lal Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & ofhers (Writ Petition imder Article 226f 227 offhe Constitution oflndi^ (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) None for fhe petitioner. Ms Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for fhe respondents. ORDBRIoralt ( Passed on fhis 15th day ofSeptember, 2009) 1. 2. Thakur The matter is called for hearing twice. On bofh the occasions noue appears nor any representation is made on behalf of fhe petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in prosecuting fhe matter. In view of fhe foregomg, the petition is dismissed for waat of prosecutk>n. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge