IN THE HIGH COUPT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE 1998 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.VISHWANATHA SHETTY TI ON NO.17905 1998 BETWEEN: 1, Sri,Kareemsab S/o B.Fakeerasab Age: 48 years, 0cc: Agril. 2, Sri,Nabisab S/o B.Fakeersab, Age: 38 years, 0cc: Agril. ..PETITIONERS both are R/o Mustoor DiggiCamp Tq: Gangavathl, Dist: Koppal. AND: 1, The Deøuty Commissioner Koppal, Dist: Koppal. 1A, Sri,Shivaram, Age: Major, 0cc: Deputy commissioner Koppal, Dist: Koppal. 2. Assistant Director of Land Records Koppal, Dist: Koppal. 3. Taluka Bhumapana Kacheri, Gangavathi, 01st: Koppal. —2— 4. The Tahsildar, Gangavathi, Dist: ICopoal. S. Sub4nspector of Police, Karatai, Tq: Gangavati, Dist: Kopl, .,RESPONDENTS (By Sri.B.E.Kotlan, HCGP This WP is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution praying to quash Annex—E & F dt, 14.5,98 & 25—5—98 by R—1 & 3 respectively, This WP is coining on for Preliminary Hearing this day, the Court made the following:— ORDER Sri 3,E,Kotian, learned Government Advocate is directed to take notice to resoondents—1,2, 3, 4 and 5, 2. Thepetitioners in this petition h4fe called in question the correctness of the endorsnent lated 14th May, 1q93, given by the 1st respondent, wherein, he has directed the 4th respondent to survey the land after obtaintng police protection. r 4? 3. Sri Chandrashekar Patil leaned counsel aØpearing for the petitioners sub mitted that the said order/endorsasent passed by the 1st rewpondent it totally without jurisdiction. 4. I an unable to accede to the sub mission of the leaned counsel appearing for the petitioners. The order made by this court in the Writ Petition No.6324/98 shows that the writ petition filed by the petitioners challenging the order of the Appellate Authority for non—consideration of grant of interim order was dismissed. Therefore, in the absence of any interim order granted by the Appellate Authority staying the order passed by the original •uthority the Authorities La law are entitled to give effect to the order passed by the original authority. While giving effect to the order passed by the original authority, if any of the parties obstructing he proceedinGs relating to survey of their lane, the Pevenue Authorities were ntitleb to oDtain police assistance. Cbviously, on the comolaint Given G the contesting resoondents obstructing the survey of the lane, tGC 1st resoondent aears to nave nassed the order. Therefore, I do not find any justification to interfere against the i oroer—Annexure—D It iS seen that Lb isjt nt Co nissioner was djrecte to djsoe of th a p el within our week Ie Gained ounse Lubalts cha ti 1 roqthe doDeal has rot at een i osd ol; under i crc ices, I ii o the vi w, it is neces ry 0 ii r no r t A5tttcflt onissioner to o I it irection Given cy this court t erise hG 4i11 have to fece the consecuences, —5— 54 In the light of the discussion made above, this petition is rejected. However, direction is given to the Assistant Commissioner, Koppal to give effect to the direction given by this court in Writ Petition No.6324/1998 without further delay. 6, Communicate this order to the Assistant Commissioner, Koppal, 7. Sri Kotian, learned Government Advocate is given four weeks time to file his memo of appe ararice. Sd! JUDGE La