CAW/1314-to-1322/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1314 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4655 OF 2004 Y.S. Jagtap ... Applicant V/s. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Nasik ... Respondent ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1315 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4651 OF 2004 B.B. Gavandi ... Applicant V/s. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Nasik ... Respondent AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1316 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4639 OF 2004 R.S. Salunke ... Applicant V/s. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Nasik ... Respondent AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1317 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5548 OF 2004 A.B. Shinde ... Applicant V/s. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Nasik ... Respondent CAW/1314-to-1322/2010 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1318 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4653 OF 2004 D.V. Sabale ... Applicant V/s. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Nasik ... Respondent AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1320 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4704 OF 2004 R.L. Mandlik ... Applicant V/s. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Nasik ... Respondent AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1321 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4589 OF 2004 P.R. Dhomse ... Applicant V/s. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Nasik ... Respondent AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1322 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5839 OF 2004 B.R. Dhakrao ... Applicant V/s. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Nasik ... Respondent Mr. Neel Helekar for the Applicants. Mr. G.S. Hegde for the Respondents. CAW/1314-to-1322/2010 CORAM: SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE : 17 TH SEPTEMBER, 2010. P.C. : 1. These Civil Applications have been filed for fixing a peremptory date of hearing of the Writ Petitions on the basis that the Supreme Court has in the case of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation & Anr. vs. Casteribe Rajya Parivahan Karmachari Sanghatana, reported in (2009) 8 SCC 556, decided that the judgment in the case of State of Karnataka vs. Umadevi, reported in (2006) 4 SCC 1 , does not apply to the matters pertaining to the Industrial Court. 2. In my opinion, these Civil Applications cannot be allowed on this ground as there are many Writ Petitions of prior years pending final hearing. 3. The Civil Applications are dismissed.