1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 2337/2009 (Shaikh Sattar vs. The State with CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2748 OF 2009 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. Shaikh Naseer and Mr. G.V.Wani, Counsel, for respective applicants. Mr. S.G.Nandedkar, APP, for respondent/State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:10/9/2009 ... P.C.: 1. Heard respective Counsel extensively. Since identical prayer of waiver of the condition is made, applications are heard together. 2. By order dt.28.4.2008 in Criminal Application No.1241/1998 and order dt.15.4.2008 in Criminal Application No.1153/2008, Brother Judge directed the applicants herein to be released on furnishing bail to the tune of Rs.25,000/- and regular attendance as stated in para 5/6 of the order. Considering 2 the nature of allegations and the gravity in the matter, such order was passed. At this stage, I do not feel any necessity to interfere with the said direction. It may be that the accused/applicant in Application No.2337/2009, contemplated to be Railway employee, however, care is taken to seek his attendance in the evening after office hours. Both the applications lack merit, dismissed, however, liberty to move after six months. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/2337-09craplgr ...