S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO. 460/2000 State of Rajasthan and others. Versus. Ashok Jumar and others. 10/09/2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK PARIHAR. Mr. SN Gupta, Dy. Government Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Suresh Pareek, for the respondents. Suit for injunction filed by the plaintiff-respondent was decreed by the trial court vide judgment and decree dated 22/01/1998. The above judgment and decree passed by the trial court has further been affirmed by the lower appellate court vide judgment and decree dated 24/05/2000. After hearing counsel for the parties, I have carefully gone through the material on record. The present appeal filed on behalf of the State on the face of it appears to be wholly misconceived since the dispute was only in regard to the plaintiffs-respondents and the concerned Municipal board. It is also relevant to mention here that the judgment of Revenue Appellate Authority passed earlier setting aside the proceedings under Section 91 of the Land Revenue Act has not been challenged by the State before the Board of Revenue. On the basis of concurrent findings of fact, since after due consideration proper discretion has already been used by both the courts below, in the facts and circumstances, no further interference is called for by this Court, moreso, when no substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed accordingly as having no merits. (Ashok Parihar), J.