IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21537 of 2009 ANIL YADAV Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SANGITA DEVI ----------- 2/ 01/07/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In a complaint case under Section-498A of I.P.C. the petitioner being the husband the prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected on 13.5.2008 in view of his disinterest in the matter when the complainant was willing to go back to the matrimonial home. Learned counsel for the petitioner today submits that the petitioner is now also not averse to reviving matrimonial harmony. Considering that the matter be under Section-498A of I.P.C. notwithstanding that he has eluded the law for nearly one year since the rejection of his prayer for anticipatory bail earlier, this Court grants him the privilege of anticipatory bail for a period of six months only with a direction to surrender upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda in Complaint Case No.848(C)/06. If during the period of six months or 2 thereafter the petitioner appears physically and surrenders to the jurisdiction of the court below, his application for regular bail shall be considered in light of the subsequent developments and the attitude of the parties to be assessed by the court below, without being prejudiced by the present limited grant of anticipatory bail. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)