1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.10.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 1116 of 2011 And M.P.(MD).Nos. 1 & 2 of 2011 Palaru Gounder : Petitioner/Accused Vs. 1. State represented by The Inspector of Police Vedasandur Circle Dindigul District : Respondent/Complainant 2. Silambana Gounder : Respondent/De-facto Complainant PRAYER: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records relating to the C.C.No. 205 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul and quash the same. *** For Petitioner : Mr.G.R.Swaminathan For 1st Respondent: Mr.P.Kandasamy Government Advocate For 2nd Respondent: M/s.S.Ragaventhree O R D E R Seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No. 205 of 2010 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul, the petitioner has come forward with this Petition. 2. A perusal of the case would go to show that the offences said to have been committed by the petitioner are under Sections 465, 468, 471 and 420 of IPC. The case is therefore triable as a warrant case. 3. It is the contention of the petitioner before this Court that absolutely there are no grounds to proceed against the petitioner. If so, he can very well make an application before the learned Magistrate for discharge. When such an application is filed, I am sure that the learned Magistrate will consider whether there are grounds to proceed against the petitioner further or to discharge. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. Without invoking the said alternative remedy, which is more efficacious available, I do not understand as to why the petitioner is directed to rush this Court invoking Section 482 of Cr.P.C. 5. In my considered opinion, the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court could be utilised if only there is no remedy available for the party to work out before the Lower Court. Since there is an effective remedy available for the petitioner to work out his remedy before the Lower Court this Petition cannot be entertained. 6. In such view of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case of the petitioner, I am inclined to dismiss this Petition. 7. Accordingly, this Petition is dismissed giving liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the Lower Court. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AS) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedachandur 2. The Inspector of Police Vedasandur Circle, Dindigul District 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai +1cc to Mr.G.R.Swaminathan, Advocate, Sr.No.36769 vsg ssk/08.11.2011 /5c -2p/- Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 1116 of 2011 and M.P.(MD).Nos. 1 & 2 of 2011 20.10.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/