1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.10.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL.O.P.(MD).No.13655 of 2011 P.Veluchamy : Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Panthalkudi Police Station, Virudhunagar District. : Respondents PRAYER: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the first respondent to change the investigation agency i.e, the third respondent and conduct the enquiry in a proper manner by appointing an efficient investigate agency. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senthilkumar For Respondents : Mr.P.Kannithevan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R The petitioner is the father of one Karthikselvan. On 31.07.2011, while Mr.Karthikselvan was sleeping, he developed fits. He was immediately taken to the hospital, where he died at 06.15 AM on the same day. On a complaint preferred by the petitioner, a case in Crime No.183 of 2011 has been registered by the third respondent police. Later on, the dead body was sent for post-mortem. In the postmortem certificate, it has been mentioned that in the post-mortem certificate, it has been mentioned that 100 ml blood seen in the abdominal cavity and there was no external injury noticed. Since there was blood found in the abdominal cavity, the petitioner apprehends that it may be a case of murder, and therefore, he has come forward with the present Criminal Original Petition seeking to transfer the case to some other officer. 2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that on the direction of the second respondent, now the investigation has been taken by the Inspector of Police, Aruppukkottai Police Station. The internal organs have been sent for chemical examination. He would further submit that the Inspector of Police, Aruppukkotai Police Station, will do proper investigation and do the needful. The said statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) is recorded. 3. In view of the change of officer to do the investigation, I am of the considered view that the relief sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted at this stage. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the further https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 progress to be made by the Inspector of Police, Aruppukkotai Police Station, he will be at liberty to approach this Court again. With the above observation, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar / True Copy / Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Panthalkudi Police Station, Virudhunagar District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1CC TO MR.R.SENTILKUMAR, ADVOCATE SR : 37194 NB SR : 11.11.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER MADE IN CRL.O.P.(MD).No.13655 of 2011 31.10.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/