HI»iCOURT <y aiHATnSSARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fS) No. 2047 of 2007 Sii^le BenehsHon'ble Sferi Sotish K. Agnthotri. J. Smt. Bindu ©urjarWife of Shri Paras fiirjar, oged about 27 yews, Resident of Villcge !0i<a'ra, Viilage Paichayat arra, Block Od9i, Tahsil Surajpur, bistriet Surgiya (C.S.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Ihe Secretary, bepartrnent of Women and Child Devebpment, &. K. S. Siawan Raipur (C.6.) . The Coltector, Ambikapur, Nstrict Surgiyo (C.6.) 3. The &istrict Progr'amme Officer. Women and Child Develeyment, Ambikapur, District Surgiya (C.&.) 4. The Project Officer, Women ond Child Oevelopment, Od9i, Block Odgi, District Sui^uja (C.©.) 5. The Chief Executivs Officer, Janpad Panchayat Odgi, Tdisil Surajpf, Oistrict Sui^uja (C.S.) 6. Smt. Sunita Vadov Wife of Shri &harampal, Caste Ahir, aged about 30 years, Resident of Villoge Panchayut Kharra, Block Odgi, Tdisil Sureypu", bistrict Sur^uja (C.&.) Present; Mr. Ashok Kumap Shukla, eounsel for the petitioner. Mr. Vinay Pnndey, Pwiel Ltn»yerfor State/respondents No. 1 to 4. OR&ER (Passed on 3rd Dayof April, 2007) 1. Lear-hed counse! appearing for the pstitionei* submits thot the appointment of respondent No. 6 as Aarganbadi Worker is contrary to the provisions of Aanganbali Sdieme. The petitioner has preferentiai right of appointment over the respondent No. 6 on ths ground that the petitioner lives bebw 1+ie poverty !ine ond she is a!so deserted lady. Learned counse! oppearing for the petitioner' has made certain other atiegations a!so. 2. Be that as it may, the Coliector, Surguja is directed to look into the allegations raade by fhe petitioner and pass appropriate order after* affording opportunity of hear'ing to the parties in accor'dance with !<»and as per Aongonbadi Scheme, within a psriod of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 3. In viesw of the above, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhash