CWP- 9615/10 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.9615/2010 Smt. Heera Devi. Versus State & Ors Date of Order ::: 09/08/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Amit Jindal, for petitioner Instant petition has been filed by petitioner with the grievance that her candidature has not been considered while making appointment on the post of Angan Bari worker by the Gram Sabha in its meeting held on 15/03/2010. The petitioner was appointed way back in July, 1997 as Angan Bari Worker, however, resigned in January, 2010 to contest Panchayat Election-2010 which was duly accepted and she contested the Panchayat Elections but could not be finally succeeded. However, thereafter she again submitted application to allow her to join but that was not accepted. Taking note thereof, she submitted fresh application before the Gram Sabha, however, after consideration of the applications received, the name of the respondent No.5 was recommended for appointment by the Gram Sabha in its meeting held on 15/03/2010. Counsel submits that the petitioner's candidature has not been fairly considered while making fresh appointment in March, 2010 CWP- 9615/10 //2// and the experience, which she had gained of 13 years, has not been looked into by the respondents while appointment was made. Counsel further submits that the candidate, who contested the election alongwith petitioner, after becoming Sarpanch of the Gram Sabha, held the meeting in which selections were made and such recommendation cannot be said to be in conformity of Article 14 of the Constitution. The submissions made are without substance for the reason that the past services rendered by the petitioner were of no significance for the reason that she had resigned and participated in the fresh selection process which the respondents initiated for the post of Angan Bari Worker. The petitioner has not placed any material on record from which it may justify that she was having better meritorious record in comparison to respondent No.5 who has been recommended for appointment by the Gram Sabha in its meeting held on 15/03/2010. So far as the submission made that the candidate, who was elected as Sarpach, contested elections alongwith petitioner and held meeting of Gram Sabha, is concerned, suffice it to say that if she had been elected as Sarpanch, was supposed to hold the meeting of Gram Sabha. In the instant case, the petitioner has not alleged any malice against the Sarpanch who had participated in the CWP- 9615/10 //3// meeting in which the selections were held. Consequently, the writ petition has no substance and it is accordingly dismissed. (Ajay Rastogi), J. Raghu/p3/9615-CW-2010-final.doc