IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA SECOND APPEAL NO. 79 OF 2010 SMT. ESLINDA D'SILVA ALIAS ESLINDA CANDIDA VISITACAO DA SILVA ... Appellant Versus MARIA MONTEIRO AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. J. Godinho, Advocate for the appellant. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 18th February, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. Godinho, learned Counsel for the appellant. 2. By this appeal, the appellant takes exception to the judgment and decree dated 22nd April, 2010 passed by the District Judge-II, South Goa, Margao in Regular Civil Appeal No.93/2010 partly allowing the appeal against the judgment and decree dated 23rd December, 2009 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Margao in Special Civil Suit No.165/2001/A. 3. Initially, Vincent Rodrigues and his wife Lourdes Rodrigues filed suit through their constituted attorney against the appellant herein seeking reliefs of declaration and eviction. During the pendency of the suit, the suit property was transferred in favour of respondent no.2 herein and he was brought on record in the suit. The trial Court granted relief of declaration, but refused the prayer of eviction. The lower appellate Court allowed the appeal preferred by the respondents and dismissed the counterclaim filed by the appellant herein. 4. Having heard the learned Counsel for the appellant and having perused the record, I am of the considered opinion that no fault can be found with the findings given by the lower appellate Court. The lower appellate Court has rightly held that the title in respect of the suit property vests in the respondents and the appellant has absolutely no right to be in possession of the suit property. This finding has been given on a correct appreciation of evidence led by the parties in the suit. 5. In any case, no substantial questions of law is involved in the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA