IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14350 of 2009 RAJEEV KUMAR, SON OF MAHENDRA MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SAREN GARH, POLICE STATION-MAKHDUMPUR, DISTRICT- JEHANABAD………………………………………………………..PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…………………………………….OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, A.P.P. For the informant : M/s. Sheel Bhadra Jha and Ashok Kumar, Advocates. --------- 2. 11.5.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Rajeev Kumar, one of the F.I.R. named accused of Makhdumpur P.S. Case No.176 of 2008 registered under Sections 379, 325, 308 and other allied Sections of the Penal Code for allegedly having assaulted his village Aunt Satyabhama Devi with a lathi on the right temporal region thereby causing bleeding injury. According to the doctor the injury was a swelling on right temporal region 3” X 2” with bleeding and due to such injury from middle cravical fossa on the right ear which in the opinion of the doctor would be dangerous to the life and was caused by hard and blunt substance. The fact remains that the petitioner and others attacked three women and caused injury to all three of them. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner has qualified for recruitment in the Indian Army and he is to report before the authorities by 20.5.2009. Be that as it may, although the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected, the learned trial court may consider his prayer for provisional bail - 2 - subject to stringent conditions being laid down and on proper securities being given. Let this order be communicated to the learned trial court through fax, the expanses of which will be borne by the petitioner. P.S. (Abhijit Sinha,J)