IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1676 of 2010 Between: Bandi Atmakur Gram Panchayat Kurnool District. ..... Petitioner AND Pegidela Raja Reddy & others. .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Smt. Ch. Veda Vani Counsel for the respondents: Sri O. Manohar Reddy The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1676 of 2010 ORDER: This contempt case is filed alleging willful disobedience of order dated 07.10.2010 in Writ Petition No.5684 of 2010. By the said order, this Court has modified the previous order dated 11.03.2010 to the effect that respondent No.1 – writ petitioner shall not raise any further constructions in deviation of the sanctioned plan. In the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case, it is inter alia stated that despite the said order, respondent No.1 has been raising the constructions in deviation of the sanctioned plan. The petitioner has, however, failed to give the details of the deviations and it has not given any notice to respondent No.1 on the alleged deviations before filing this contempt case. The contempt proceedings, being quasi criminal in nature, the petitioner is expected to issue prior notice pointing out to the contemnor as to in what manner he has violated the orders of the Court. As the petitioner failed to follow this procedure, I am not inclined to entertain the contempt case at this stage. The contempt case is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to issue notice to respondent No.1 and avail its remedy in the event it is felt that respondent No.1 is continuing with the act of alleged contempt. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 21.01.2011 ES