THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No : 467 of 2011 O R D E R: This Writ Petition is directed against an order passed by the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court at Warangal in Interlocutory Application No. 64 of 2010 filed in Miscellaneous Petition No. 3 of 2010 by the petitioner herein. Miscellaneous Petition No. 3 of 2010 has been taken out by Respondents 2 to 5 herein, who claim to be the workmen of the petitioner herein. They have filed the said application in terms of Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 seeking directions for computation and determination of the amounts, which are due and liable to be paid to them by the petitioner herein on account of closing down its establishment without following the due procedure for terminating the services of the workmen employed therein. The petitioner herein filed I.A.No. 64 of 2010 in the said Miscellaneous Petition, raising several contentions about the maintainability of the Miscellaneous Petition. Dealing with the said I.A., all that the Court did was to pass the following order: “ Heard. Perused the petition and written arguments. This point can be decided in main M.P. but not in this I.A. I.A. filed only under Section 151 C.P.C., which is not applicable as stated by the petitioner. There are no grounds and petition is dismissed.” The Court has not expressed any opinion one way or the other. It merely observed that the objections raised by the petitioner herein with regard to the maintainability of the Miscellaneous Petition will be considered when the Miscellaneous Petition itself is taken up for determination. I see no reason whatsoever to interfere with the order passed by the Labour Court while dismissing the I.A. No prejudice will be caused to the petitioners’ case at all. It is not necessary that all objections raised must be dealt with at the preliminary stage. They can as well be dealt with when the Miscellaneous Petition is taken up for determination. Therefore, the cause of the writ petitioner has not suffered any adverse impact for it to approach this Court. There is no error apparent on record for me to entertain this Writ Petition to correct the same. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to agitate all the contentions available to it, including the maintainability of Miscellaneous Petition No. 3 of 2010, when the said petition is taken up by the Labour Court for determination. No costs. ---------------------------------- Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J 24th January 2011 ksld ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}