27 o/o 24.O3.2OLI Present: Mr. Sumit Arora, Proxy Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Gupta, APP for the state sI Ratan Kumar, P.S. S. Bagh & SI L.N. Saini, P.S. Bawana. Respondent No. 3 in Person. 7 Crl. M.A. No. 3559/2011 (exemPtion) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disPosed of. I Crl. M.C. No. 943 '^O11 At the relevant time, petitioner an4 respondent No. 3 were living in tJre same locality. Disputel arose between them over payment of some money which had led to registration of the present FIR on the complaint of respondent No. 3. Now, both the parties have settled their disputes amicably, inasmuch as they want to maintain harmonious relations in future. Respondent No. 3, who is present in the Court and has been identified by the Investigating Officer, has no objection in case FIR in question is quashed. Keeping in mind the setttement arrived at between the parties, in the larger interest FIR No. 539 12001 under Sections 386 / 452 / 506 / 34 IPC registered at Police Station Shalim ar Bagh and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom a.re quashed. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Petition is disposed of in ttre above terms. Dasti. Crl. M.A. No. 3558/2O11 (stay) Disposed of as infructuous. MARCH 24,2OLL rb \d-.-!.-- - A.K. PATHAK, J.