IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25371 of 2011 Ranjeet Rai, S/O Sri Satya Narayan Rai, R/O Vill- Simri Gopal, P.S.-Chak Mahesi, District-Samastipur. ---------- Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ---------- Opp. Party ----------- 3 24.10.2011 Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused for offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and is said to have been identified by the informant in the Test Identification Parade. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that not only the informant is the resident of the same Panchayat but also that the co-accused, namely, Arjun Paswan, who too was identified by the informant in course of Test Identification Parade, has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 14.10.2011 in Cr. Misc. No. 25792 of 2011. He has further submitted that the petitioner has only one more criminal case pending against him and that he was named in course of investigation. Considering all these aspects, this Court would direct for release of the 2 petitioner, namely, Ranjeet Rai on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, FTC-II, Samastipur in connection with Sessions Trial No. 294 of 2011/201 of 2011 arising out of Chak Mahesi P.S. Case No. 11 of 2011, subject to the following conditions:- (i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioner will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and his absence even for a single day would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of his bail. (iii) The petitioner in case is now made accused in any other criminal case, that would itself lead to cancellation of his bail. Subject to the aforementioned conditions, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)