BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:15.03.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN WP(MD)No.2235 of 2011 And MP(MD)No.1 of 2011 M.Murugan :Petitioner -Vs- The Joint Sub Registrar No.2, Periyakulam, Theni District. :Respondent PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the proceedings of impugned order of the respondent in A.Thi.Mu 49/2011 dated 15.02.2011 and quash the same and further directing the respondent to register the petitioner's marriage in pursuant to the petitioner's application dated 15.02.2011 and issue the petitioner Marriage Registration Certificate. For petitioner :Mr.R.Maheswaran For Respondent :Mr.K.Balasubramanian,Additional Government Pleader ORDER The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition to issue a Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the proceedings of impugned order of the respondent in A.Thi.Mu. 49/2011 dated 15.02.2011 and quash the same and further directing the respondent to register the petitioner's marriage in pursuant to the petitioner's application dated 15.02.2011 and issue the petitioner Marriage Registration Certificate. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has approached the respondent to get a marriage certificate with an application, on 15.02.2011. He would further submit that in order to prove his age, he submitted his transfer certificate and also submitted ration card to prove his wife age and the same was returned by the respondent stating that the age proof is not in the proper form and further stated that either the petitioner can produce in the form of school certificate or the date of birth certificate. Challenging the same, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition. 3.When a specific question was put to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that what is the difficulty in producing either the birth certificate or any other documents, which can prove the date of birth, he would contend that his wife is not an educated person and therefore, there is no transfer certificate available. But as far as the birth certificate, he has to apply and get the same. Since the order only seeks proof of age necessary document need is to be produced to support the claim of the petitioner. The petitioner is not able to point out any infirmity in the impugned order. 4.With the above said observation, this Writ Petition is disposed of It is always open to the petitioner to produce the document to prove the age and represent the application or file a fresh application before the respondent.Consequently,connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar To: The Joint Sub Registrar No.2, Periyakulam, Theni District. +1CC to Mr.R.Maheswaran, Advocate. SR.No.6723. +1CC to The Special Government Pleader. SR.No.6851. Vsg WP(MD)No.2235 of 2011 And MP(MD)No.1 of 2011 RP/24.03.2011/1P/4C. 15.03.2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/