WP(C) 4046/2005 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AK GOSWAMI This writ petition has been filed by the Assam Junior College Second Post Teache rs and Library Assistants Association, represented by Secretary, praying for (i) a direction to the respondents to make available the financial benefits of gran t-in-aid to 227 numbers of staff of Junior Colleges with effect from 1.2.2001 a nd (ii) a direction to the respondents to determine to fix inter-se seniority of teaching and non teaching staff of 48 Junior Colleges who were brought under th e deficit system of grants-in-aid on the basis of their date of joining. At the very outset, Mr. P.K. Tiwari, learned counsel for the pet itioner, has submitted that, for the present, the petitioner would not like to a gitate the issue of determination of the inter-se seniority and would like to ag itate the same at a future date, if the occasion so arises. The second prayer of the petitioner, thus, does not require resolution from this court. The petitio ner would, however, be at liberty to agitate the issue of inter-se seniority in future. Mr. PN Goswami, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department, in response to the submission of Mr. PK Tiwari, with regard to the first prayer, has produced before this court a letter dated 28.4.2011 issued by the Deputy Director of Secondary Education to the Sr. Standing Counsel, Education Departmen t. According to Mr. Goswami, the grievances expressed by the petitioner vis-à-v is making available the financial benefits, have been taken care of by this lett er and, therefore, he submits that there is no surviving cause of action. Mr. Tiwari, having gone through the letter mentioned above, submits that in vie w of the stand taken by the State authorities, the first grievance of the writ p etitioner has been met and, therefore, there being no surviving cause of action with respect to the first prayer also, he does not press this application. In view of the submissions of the learned counsel for the partie s, I deem it appropriate to close this writ petition, being not pressed, in view of the letter dated 28.4.2011, a copy of which is placed on record. However, the writ petitioner would be at liberty to approach thi s court again in case the contents of the letter dated 28.4.2011 is not translat ed into reality. Writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of.