IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 900 OF 2009 1.Meena Tulajaram Gelani 2.Sulabha Tulajaram Gelani 3.Nandlal Bajomal Meharchandani 4.Vinod Shyamlal Bhatia ...Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent --- Shri Vidyadhar V. Gangurde for Applicant Shri S.R. Shinde, APP for State ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 19TH MARCH, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants and the Learned APP for the State. 2. The case of the Applicants is as under: It is submitted that the Applicant nos.1 and 2 are the daughters of the Complainant Jamunabai Tuljaram Gelani and they were residing with her in the year 1992. Their brother also was used to reside along with them and at that time, the brother was unemployed. 3. It is the case of the Applicant Nos. 1 and 2 that they had purchased a flat No.601, consisting of three room kitchen in Glamour Tower, out of their own earnings, at that time, they were unmarried and, therefore, the agreement for sale deed of the flat was executed in the name of their mother, the Complainant herein. The Applicants, thereafter, requested to their mother to transfer the flat in their name. Accordingly the flat was transferred in their name by an agreement for sale dated 9th July, 1992. Thereafter, the Applicant No.1 got married with Applicant No.3 and the Applicant No.2 got married with Applicant No.4 and the mother of the Applicants shifted to Palghar. It is submitted that on the instigation of their brother, mother of the Applicant Nos.1 and 2 has filed a false complaint against them that the Applicants trespassed and committed theft of Rs.10,500/- and two golden rings and an offence, therefore, has been registered at Vithalwadi Police Station vide C.R. No.23 of 2009 punishable under sections 380, 448, 504, 506, 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 4. I have perused the agreement for sale and also the registration certificate and other documents and also the complaint filed by the mother of the Applicant Nos.1 and 2. Prima facie, it does appear that out of civil dispute the present complaint has been lodged. It is inconceivable that the Applicants who are married daughters of the Complainant trespassed and committed theft of Rs.10,500/- and two golden rings. In any case, custodial interrogation, in my view, is not necessary. 5. The Applicants, therefore, in the event of their arrest in connection with C.R. No.23 of 2009 registered with Vithalwadi Police Station for the offence punishable under sections 380, 448, 504, 506, 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, be released on bail in a sum of Rs.5,000/- each with one or two sureties in the like amount. The Applicants shall report to the concerned police station, as and when called. 6. Application is disposed of. V.M. KANADE J.