IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 27TH MAY 2010 / 6TH JYAISHTA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 363 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.6830/2010 Dated 11/03/2010 .................... PETITIONER: 1ST PETITIONER: ------------------------------ KOCHUKRISHNAN, ADVOCATE, S/O.SIVARAMABHARATHY, KARAMPATTA HOUSE, KOZHINJAMPARA POST, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA SMT.D.S.THUSHARA RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT NO.1-5 IN WPC: ---------------------------------------- 1. NEELA GANGADHARAN, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. K.GUNAVARDHAN, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. K.K.RAMESAN, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), CHIEF ENGINEER, PROJECT -1, IRRIGATION AND ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, VIKHAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. K.LATHIKA, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), CHIEF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE. 5. HARINARAYANAN, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CHITTUR PUZHA PROJECT, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI GANESH FOR R1-5 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- Contempt Case (C)No.363 of 2010 --------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of May, 2010 JUDGMENT This Contempt of Court Case is filed alleging violation of Annexure A order. The 5th respondent has filed an affidavit wherein it is mentioned that in terms of the interim order passed by this Court steps have been taken to supply water, which is not disputed by the petitioner. The only submission made by the petitioner is that, only after the filing of the Contempt of Court Case, respondents started supplying the water. Whatever that be, since the order has been complied with, the Contempt of Court Case is closed. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,) JUDGE. dsn True copy