IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No. M-4652 of 2010 Date of decision: 01.09.2011 Gaurav Bansal ..Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Anr. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Atul Lakhanpal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mandeep Singh Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Hooda, Addl. AG, Haryana. Mr. Deepak Garg, Advocate for respondent No. 2. **** SABINA, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioner to take up all the pleas available to him during the trial. Dismissed as withdrawn. However, Personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court shall remain exempted subject to the following conditions:- (i) petitioner shall be represented through counsel; (ii) shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings; (iii) shall not dispute his identity as accused; (iv) shall have no objection if the prosecution evidence is recorded in his absence but in the presnece of his counsel (v) shall appear before the trial Court as and when required by the trial Court; and (vi) any other condition which the learned trial Court may impose. (SABINA) September 01, 2011 JUDGE Poonam (II)