SGE IN‘i BEH EG C9 (:/¢7te§’,# n1‘ N TE HIGH COURT F w.p. (S) No. 96 (2011 Dr.akumar abut Ramprasad Hea Midl oureia, autam Gauam, ' Mt G hl Bdhd ) Pdd e hri retired aser, overnment Scoo aawaand, Block—enraroa, Distt. Bilaspur‘(C.G. VR ESUS 5 ea rs, t RTS ESPONDEN tate o attisgarh hrou ecretary, Educaion Departmen D..S. awan, aiur .. ubli Raipur (C.G. irector nstructions ont irector Treasury, Accoun istric Schoo l Penson, ilasur C.. strict ducatio ilasur (C.G. loc fficer enraroa,Dstt.Bilaspur (C.G Bilaspu Bp (G) fficer O, Bk O, ducatio WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226'OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA I H O CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G) € PETITIONER o Rj G, S/o agd S 6 y d de G S f Chh Tgh t t K Bh Rp (CG) D, I, Pc ) Ji D, t Dt S & i Di En. Bp ) En Pddi .) r, HIGH COURT OF CHHATPISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION S No. 696 01‘2011 PETITIONER : Dr. Ra3kumar Gautam. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. W N S ‘ E HE A C o J. A RIT PETITIO B: Hon’ble R ARTICLE Shri Satish 226 OF K. T ONSTITUTION ‘ OF INDI Present: Advocate Shn‘ H.B.Agrawal, for the petitioner. Senior Advocate with Shri J.K.Gupta, Shn' N.N.Roy, Panel Judge 2 ‘ 2004 WP No.2805 AIR sew or 2002 1 (decided on 29.8.2006) State/respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed 23' on day of February, 201 I) I. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to second kramonnati as per the circular dated 10-20% and 11-1-2010 3— (Annemre Q P/3 & P/4) atter completion 24 years of service. Leamed of counsel funher submits that the issue involved in the present petition has already been-considered and decided by this Court in RS. Verma v. State of Chhatti'sgarh & Others’. Learned counsel counsel also submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation to consider the case of the petitioner in the light ofthe decision ofthe Supreme Court rendered in State ofTrz’pztra and others v. KK. Royz and the order passed by this Court in RS. Verma (supra), to which learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection. 2. objection. Accordingly, liberty for sought by the petitioner is granted to make a representation before the 3. concerned authority. ~ In View ofthe above, the wn't petition is disposed disposed o£ MW Sd/a' _ Satish K.