1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (LODG.) NO.114 OF 2008 Anant D. Nerurkar ..Petitioner. Vs. The Chief Controller of Stamps and Inspector General of Registration and others ..Respondents. .... Anant D. Nerurkar – Petitioner in person present. Ms. Mugdha Jadhav, AGP for the State. .... CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 5th February, 2009. P.C. : We have heard the Petitioner who appears in person. We are of the considered view that the Petitioner has no cause of action to approach the Court. The implementation of the Scheme 2008 if at all would be a cause of action to an individual. The liability to pay stamp duty cannot be a matter of public interest as such. Further more the Petition is vague and does not even disclose a proper cause of action much less an issue which can be dealt with by the Court in exercise of its extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the 2 Constitution. The aggrieved individuals are obviously at liberty to take up their cause of action if they are so advised. The Petition is dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.