IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN TUESDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2009 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 13691 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- FR. JOHN JOSEPH @ JOJO, CST, S/O. MATHAI, AGED 75, DIRECTOR, SION BHAVAN, KAADUKUTTY.P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.DENIZEN KOMATH SRI.SHERRY J. THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KORATTI POLICE STATION 3. KUNJAMMA THOMAS, KALLINGAL, ELAVUMPARAMBIL VIA, THATTEKKADU, KOTHAMANGALAM.P.O BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.A.SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & P.BHAVADASAN, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.13691 of 2009 ------------------------------- Dated this the 26th May, 2009 J U D G M E N T Raman, J. Petitioner alleges police harassment at the instance of the third respondent. He is a Priest aged 75 years. It is his case that third respondent along with his unmarried daughter in a desperate stage sought shelter in petitioner's home for disabled. The third respondent entrusted an amount of Rs.1.5 lakhs with the petitioner which was deposited in a bank and it was returned for the third respondent's daughter's marriage. It is submitted that now claiming interest and raising false contentions, third respondent has approached the police and the police is asking the petitioner to come to the police station on number of occasions. 2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, produced a copy of the complaint, which gives a different story. W.P.(C) No.13691 of 2009 2 The correctness or otherwise of the allegations made in the complaint is a matter which this Court cannot now adjudicate. However, if the petitioner's presence is required for any enquiry or investigation in connection with the above case, notice as contemplated under Section 160 of Code of Criminal Procedure be issued. The writ petition is disposed of with the above observation. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE P.BHAVADASAN , JUDGE. nj.