1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL SECOND APPEAL No. 310 of 2005 LUMBHA RAM V/S STATE & ORS Mr. BK BHATNAGAR, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 12.12.2006 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the impugned judgment. In my view, it cannot be said that the appellant had acquired any legal right to continue to impart education as was permitted to him by the District Education Officer, Sirohi in the year 1992. Admittedly, the appellant does not possess any requisite qualification entitling him to impart education, even of drawing, then the appellant was not given any appointment, with any emoluments, as such, if the permission has been recalled by order Ex.-16, it cannot be said that any legal right of the appellant has been violated entitling him to maintain the present suit. In that view of the matter, may be that the reason given in Ex.-16, to be about the appellant wasting time of 2 children, being wholly irrelevant, I do not find any sufficient ground to interfere in the impugned order. The appeal thus does not involve any substantial question of law. The same is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /rm/