Cr Rev 810/04 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Cr. Revision Petition No.810/2004 Hem Chand Versus State, Baikunth Prasad & (5) Ors Date of Order ::: 05/03/08 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Arpit Srivastava for Mr. A.K.Bajpai, for petitioner (complainant) Mr. Arun Sharma, Public Prosecutor. Instant petition has been filed by complainant against order dt.30/06/99 in Cr. Case No.438/97 whereby ACJM No.3, Jaipur City while convicting them U/Ss 147, 148 & 336, IPC, released them on probation U/s 4 of Probation of Offenders Act. Counsel for complainant vehemently contends that once respondents have been held guilty of offences (supra), learned trial Magistrate was not justified in granting benefit of probation to them. U/s 336, IPC, maximum punishment is provided of three months. Nothing has come on record about past criminal antecedents of respondents which may disentitle them of benefit of probation. This Court has gone through the impugned judgment and does not find any manifest error being committed by courts below which may call for interference. Consequently, revision petition is hereby dismissed. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p1/810CrRev04prob.doc