1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR (1)S.B.CriminalMisc.Bail Application NO.3143/09 Puran Giri Vs. State of Rajasthan (2)S.B.CriminalMisc.Bail Application NO.3330/09 Satu Giri @ Satya Narayan & Anr. (3)S.B.CriminalMisc.Bail Application NO.3406/09 Ratan Lal Vs. State Date of order :: 16th July, 2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr.S.S. Shaktwat for the petitioner in bail appl. NO. 3143/09. Mr. M.K. Garg, for the petitioners in bail Appl. NO. 3330/09 Mr. S.S.Shaktwat, for the petitioner in bail appl. No. 3406/09 Mr. Anil Joshi), P.P. Mr. A.R. Nikub), P.P. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutors and perused the material/case diary made available to me during the arguments of the case. These three bail applications arise out of FIR No. 39/09 Police Station Bhadesar (Chittorgarh) therefore, they are being disposed of by this common order. So far as bail application No. 3143/09 on behalf of the petitioner Puran Giri and bail application No. 3330/09 on behalf of two accused persons Satu Giri @ Satya Narayan and Suresh Chandra are concerned, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not press both the 2 applications at this stage and liberty may be granted to them to file a fresh bail application after framing of charges against them by the trial court. Hence, the bail applications No. 3143/09 filed by Puran Giri and bail application No. 3330/09 filed by Satu Giri @ Satya Narayan and Suresh Chandra are dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh bail application after framing of charges against them by the trial court. So far as petitioner Ratan Lal S/o Shanti Lal Mali is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner contended that there were two prosecution witnesses namely Gurmeet Singh and Swarn Singh and they both do not identify him and no recovery has been made at his instance under Section 27 of the Evidence Act. Learned Public Prosecutor does not dispute the above facts. After considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, examining the record and the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I think it fit and proper to allow the bail application of Ratan Lal under Section 439 Cr.P.C. Hence, it is directed that accused-petitioner namely Ratan 3 Lal S/o Shanti Lal Mali, be released on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in C.R. No.39/09 Police Station Bhadesar (Chittorgarh) registered under Sections 395 provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) together with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. A copy of this order be placed on record in each file. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. ns.