^ IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DiVISION BENCH Coram IRAJEEVGUPTA,C.J.& ISUNILKUMARSSNHA.J Writ Petition No. 2577 of 2006 PETITIONER Parmeshwari Prathmik Upbhokta Sahkari Bhandar Maryadit, (A Co- operative Society), registered under the provistons of Madhya Pradesh Sahkari Samitiyan Adhiniyam, 1960), Lodhipara New Khursipar, Bhitai Distt. Durg (C.G.) represented through its President Shankarial Dewangan, S/o. Late Shri G.L. Dewangan, aged about 50 years, r/o. Sanjay Nagar, Supeia; Durg (C.G.) RESPONDENTS Versus 1. State of Chhattlsgarh, through the Secretary, Food & Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Coilector, Durg (C.G.) 3. Food Controller, Durg (C.G.) 4. Sub-Divisional Offcer, Saja, Dist. Durg (C.G.) 5. Union of India, Through its Secretary, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution Department, Secretariat, New Delhi. Writ petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitytjon^f India Present: Shri Mohd. Asif, tearned counsel on behalf of Smt. Fouzia Mirza, learned counsel for the petltioner. ^' r~ ;y ^ -y •-aa.: nlmmi Shri Mshore Bhaduri, leamed Additional Advocate Genera! for respondents No. 1 to 4. Shri Bhishma Kinger, iearned Standing counsel for respondent No,5. ORDER (4th March, 2008) The foilowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri Mshore Bhadurl, learned Additional Advocate General submits that as atl the issues raised in this writ petition have already been finally decided vide order dated 09-03-2007, passed in W.P. No. 5265/20W and other connected petitions, now nothing survlves for decision in this writ petition. 2. Shri Mohd. Asif, learned counsei for the petitioner could not dispute the above factual situation now prevailing )n the matter. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. 4, Consequently, the interim order dated 31-05-2006, stands vacated automatically. __^— - Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- „. suna^arstnha judge ^sssww