1 Cri.Appln.No.1194/2010 with Cri.Appln.No.1196/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1194 OF 2010 Assistant Collector, Central Excise and Customs, Nanded Division, Nanded ... APPLICANT VERSUS Kachrulal s/o Roopchand Barlota (Jain) ... RESPONDENT ..... Shri Alok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General for applicant Shri Satyajit S. Bora, Advocate for respondent ..... W I T H CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1196 OF 2010 Assistant Collector, Central Excise and Customs, Nanded Division, Nanded ... APPLICANT VERSUS Kachrulal s/o Roopchand Barlota (Jain) ... RESPONDENT ..... Shri Alok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General for applicant Shri Satyajit S. Bora, Advocate for respondent ..... 2 Cri.Appln.No.1194/2010 with Cri.Appln.No.1196/2010 CORAM : U.D. SALVI, J. DATED : 6th September, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard. Perused. 2. It is pointed out that the appeals would lie before the Court of Sessions and this can be read from Section 378(2)(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The appellant concedes to this position of law and seeks withdrawal of the applications for leave to appeal, with liberty to present the appeals before the Criminal Court of competent jurisdiction. 3. Leave to withdraw the applications for leave to appeal is granted with liberty as is available in law. The issue of delay in preferring the appeals can be considered by the concerned Court where the appeals would be preferred, on its own merits. Both the criminal applications stand disposed off accordingly. ( U.D. SALVI, J. ) fmp/cri1194.10