IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18396 of 2009 1. LAXMI SAHU, SON OF SUKAN SAHU 2. SUKAN SAHU, SON OF LATE ROUDI SAH 3. MOSMAT SIYA, WIDOW OF LATE HIRA SAH 4. SHIVIJEE SAHU, SON OF SUKAN SAHU 5. RANJIT SAHU, SON OF SUKAN SAHU 6. LALIT SAHU, SON OF SUKAN SAHU 7. URMILA DEVI, WIFE OF SUKAN SAHU ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE MARHIYA, P.S. BISFI, DISTRICT MADHUBANI. 8. RAGHUNATH SHARMA, SON OF MOTI THAKUR 9. RAM PRASAD SAHU, SON OF CHANDRA SAH BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE KOKARWA, P.S. BISFI, DISTRICT MADHUBANI. 10. PARMESHWAR SAHU, SON OF SHEETAL SAHU, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PUARI, P.S. BISFI, DISTRICT MADHUBANI. ----- PETITOINERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. PULKIT SAH, SON OF LATE BALCHANDAR SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MARHIYA, P.S. BISFI, DISTRICT MADHUBANI. ----- OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2 23.2.2010 This application has been filed for quashing the impugned order dated 8.4.2009, passed by the Sessions Judge, Madhubani in Cr. Revision No. 947 of 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this is a case relating to a civil dispute. The accused petitioners are saidto have come to the place of occurrence to take possession of the land which they had validly purchased. The allegation is that they assaulted the complainant. Learned counsel further submits that there is no injury to support the factum of assault and as such the entire allegations appear to be forged. At the stage of taking of cognizance this Court cannot look into these aspects of the matter however, these questions can be raised and considered at the time of framing of charges. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)