IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.500 of 2010 1. RAM NARESH PRASAD SINGH S/O LATE RAJNATH SINGH R/O SURYAVIHAR COLONY, P.S. RUPASPUR, DISTT. PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION COMMISSION CUM PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AGRICULTURE DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. DIRECTOR AGRICULTURE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. JOINT AGRICULTURE DIRECTOR GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 02/ 29.06.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner, Administrator and the State. Petitioner was appointed on the post of Peon in Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board, Patna and posted in the Training Centre, Patna. Subsequent to his appointment he passed Matriculation examination in the year, 1977 and also taken training of English and Hindi typing. Petitioner’s case is that despite his eligibility for promotion to Class III posts, juniors to him were promoted and his case was ignored. There is no statement in the writ application that for being promoted to Class III post, he has passed mandatory limited departmental examination. Simply it has been stated that five persons, who were appointed with the petitioner, have been promoted to Class III posts. There is no statement that petitioner fulfills - 2 - requisite criteria for promotion from Class IV to Class III post. In this view of the matter, I do not find that the petitioner has been able to make out a case of discrimination. However, counsel representing the Administrator, earlier Agriculture Marketing Board (since dissolved), submits that all matters relating to service conditions of the employee of the Agriculture Marketing Board including transfer, posting, promotion or other matters is to be supervised by the Three Men Committee constituted in this regard. In case the petitioner has any grievance, he may represent before the concerned committee. The petitioner has option to approach the committee, for redressal of his grievance. This application is disposed of. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)