IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1630 of 2008 PREM NATH SAHNI @ MUNNA SAHNI Versus SRIMATI SONA DEVI & ANR ----------- 2. 24.9.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the amendment sought in paragraph 27 of the written statement was only either removal of a typographical error as with regard to plot no. 3397 by seeking it plot no. 3391 or was only explanatory which becomes apparent from the fact that such statement was not made only in respect of plot no. 3397 in the original written statement, rather the same was by way of his case as with regard to plot nos. 3386, 3394 and plot no. 4202. That being so, the court below has committed jurisdictional error in refusing such amendment in the written statement. Accordingly, this civil revision application is allowed and the impugned order is set aside with a direction the Court below to permit the petitioner to incorporate the amendment as sought in the written statement. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/