IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6175 of 2011 MITHUN KUMAR @ MUNNA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 29.04.2011 Let the petitioner make correction in the prayer portion. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The police conducted the raid on the information that the brilliant students are being allowed to impersonate the bona fide candidate in the medical and engineering competitive examination when the four persons were arrested. On the confession of the apprehended accused persons, the name of the petitioner sprang up. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no recovery has been made from the petitioner and a statement has been made in the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 2 Considering the fact that the petitioner is a student of engineering, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 287/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)