IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34048 of 2009 KUNAL KUMAR @ KUNAL KUMAR SINGH Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----- 3/ 30.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no cogent evidence in the case to involve the petitioner in kidnapping. There can be some substance in the submission but victim was last seen with this petitioner, as stated by some of the witnesses and there is no enmity in between the parties, rather petitioner is one of the good friends of kidnapped boy, for false involvement and the kidnapped boy is traceless till today. Taking the above facts and other materials on merit, petitioner’s prayer has earlier been rejected by this Court. So, I find no fresh ground to allow the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is rejected. However, the Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)