1 10319.10 SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10319 OF 2010 Shri.Sopan Gundaji Adagale ...Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.Vijay Garad for Petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED:- APRIL 20, 2011. P.C. 1. The grievance of the petitioner seems to be although he has retired from service on 28th February, 2006, his gratuity fund and regular pension has not been made over to him so far. 2. The Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make representation to the appropriate Authority who is supposed to decide the petitioner’s claim for gratuity fund and regular pension. 3. If such representation is made by the petitioner, the said Authority shall decide the said representation as expeditiously as possible and in any 2 10319.10 case, not later than three months from the date of receipt of such representation. 4. We make it clear that we are not expressing any opinion either way as to whether the petitioner is entitled for the relief claimed by him in this Petition. That will have to be decided on its own merits in accordance with law. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)