THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Writ Petition No.18436 of 2011 22nd September, 2011 Between :- Mohd.Ahmed Ali .. Petitioner And The Deputy Commissioner of Police, South Zone, Purani Haveli, Hyderabad And others .. Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Writ Petition No.18436 of 2011 ORDER:- This Writ Petition has been filed by Mohd.Ahmed Ali assailing the action of the respondents in not considering the representation dated 25-2-2009 for deletion of his name in rowdy/history-sheet. This is the second journey of the petitioner to this Court. Earlier the petitioner filed Writ Petition No.12472 of 2005 seeking Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in pending rowdy/history-sheet against him at Chatrinaka P.S. The said Writ Petition came to be disposed of on 13-3-2008. Relevant portion of the order reads as hereunder:- “I am of the opinion that unless the concerned Officer records the reasons in writing for continuing the rowdy sheet that the activities of the rowdy sheeters are prejudicial to the maintenance of the public order or affecting the peace and tranquility in the area and that no one is coming forward to file a complaint such rowdy sheet cannot be continued. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, Writ Petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file a representation before the 2nd respondent enclosing the relevant Judgments of the criminal cases and if any such representation is filed the same may be considered and disposed of within three weeks from the date of receipt of the same. There shall be no order as to costs.” Pursuant to the direction given in the said Writ Petition, the petitioner claims to have submitted representation to the Deputy Commissioner of Police, South zone, Purani Haveli, Hyderabad – respondent No.1. His representation is stated to be pending consideration. Hence, this Writ Petition. When the Writ Petition came up for admission, learned AGP for Home takes notice on behalf of the respondents. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the parties. The factual aspect of the petitioner filing representation seeking deletion of his name from the rowdy/history-sheet is not controverted by the learned Asst.Government Pleader. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider the representation filed by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ________________________ B.Seshasayana Reddy, J 22nd September, 2011 smr