IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM NO.684-CI of 2007 and RFA No.3380 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: February 12, 2007 Ajit Yadav ….Appellant. VERSUS The Land Acquisition Collector ….Respondent CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL PRESENT: Shri Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for the appellant. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). Notice of the application to the Advocate General, Haryana. On the asking of Court, Shri Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. The prayer made in the present application is to dispose of the main appeal in terms of the judgment dated May 3, 2006 passed in RFA No.2501 of 2001 (Ved Pal and others v. State of Haryana and others). A copy of the judgment in Ved Pal’s case has been appended alongwith the present application. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the judgment in Ved Pal’s case, I find that the controversy in the main appeal is indeed covered by the judgment in Ved Pal’s case (supra). CM NO.684-CI of 2007 and RFA No.3380 of 2006 -2- Consequently, the prayer made in the application is allowed. The main appeal being RFA No.3380 of 2006 is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated May 3, 2006 passed in RFA No.2501 of 2001 (Ved Pal and others v. State of Haryana and others). CM as well as the main appeal stand disposed of accordingly. February 12, 2007 (Viney Mittal) KD Judge