IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 16TH DECEMBER 2008 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 33499 of 2008(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- POORAM RESIDENCY HOTEL INDIA PVT. LTD., PO AMMADAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SATHYAVRATHAN, S/O. KUTTAPPAN, CHELIPARAMBIL HOUSE,PALLISSERY DESOM, ARATTUPUZHA VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.M.N.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. PARALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, AMMADAM P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. PARALAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH, AMMADOM P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO FOR R1-2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 33499 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 16th day of December, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext.P8 stop memo issued by the 1st respondent-Panchayat to the petitioner directing the petitioner to stop functioning of the petitioner's activities of construction as per Ext.P3 permit. I am of opinion that after having issued Ext.P8 stop memo, the Panchayat is bound to pass final orders in the matter in accordance with law, as provided under the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to pass final orders pursuant to Ext.P8 stop memo, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2