1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY OEDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 1 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 426 OF 2008 Muthu Palani alias Perumal Devendran. .. Petitioner. vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. N.L. Gaikwad for the petitioner. None for respondents. CORAM : J. N. PATEL & A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 13TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C. : This application for review has been placed before us as the members of the Bench who passed the order under review are no 2 more judges of this Court. The ground on which the review is sought is that as the petitioner was having an unauthorised stall from where he was running a garage in the name and style of Sai Auto Works for ‘ ’ last so many years, it cannot be held to be unauthorised or illegal structure. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that as he was not before the Court he could not impress upon the Court about the right of the petitioner to continue to carry on business in the unauthorised stall which came to be demolished by the Corporation. 3. On 10.6.2008 this Court has disposed of the petition by observing that the petitioner is having an unauthorised stall which was earlier demolished by the Corporation. He has re-erected the said stall again and wants the respondent-Corporation to issue him a licence to run a garage there. But, this cannot be permitted in law and no such relief can be granted by this Court. Hence, the review petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. ( J. N. PATEL, J.) 3 ( A. A. SAYED, J.)