IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18293 of 2010 DANGAL MISTRY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 19.05.2010 Heard counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner while pressing this application for bail which has been filed in view of liberty so granted to the petitioner by order dated 30.07.2009 (Annexure-1), submits that the petitioner has not been produced from the jail custody as a result whereof charges have not been framed in the present case. He has produced an order-sheet of the learned trial court wherefrom it appears that other accuseds (on bail) are present before the court on the dates fixed at the trial, but because of non- production of the petitioner from the jail custody, the charges could not be framed. This Court while declining the prayer for bail, disposes of the present application in the following manner: “Let the trial court ensure the appearance of the petitioner and frame the charges against the accuseds within three weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in the court below. As soon as the charges are framed, the trial court shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10, 000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to its satisfaction (Addl. Sessions Judge II, Nalanda, Biharsharif) in S.Tr.No.438/09 arising out of Islampur P.S.Case No.42/2000 subject to the condition that one of the bailors shall be his own/close family member and the petitioner shall appear on each date fixed at the trial. In - 2 - case of default in appearance on two consecutive dates, the trial court shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law.” hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )