IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 19TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 33952 of 2010(T) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ M/S.DLF SOUTHERN TOWNS (P) LTD., DOOR NO.60/VA 136 (3826), VTH FLOOR, PDR BHAVAN, PALLIYIL LANE, FORESHORE ROAD, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN, PIN-682 016, REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER, MR.ASOKA KUMARAN NAIR.T.R. BY ADV. SMT.K.LATHA RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, WORKS CONTRACT TAX & LT, OFFICE OF THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM-682 019. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM-682 019. 4. THE COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, PUBLIC OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.33952 of 2010-T ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of November, 2010. J U D G M E N T Grievance of the petitioner is that the second respondent is not issuing required number of books containing Form 15 declarations, for the purpose of facilitating transport of materials to their work site at Kakkanad. It is the contention of the petitioner that Ext.P2 request submitted in this regard, as early as on 20.10.2010, has not been considered. The petitioner is prevented from carrying on business in an effective manner for want of Form 15 declarations, is the contention. Ext.P3 is a representation submitted by the petitioner before the Deputy Commissioner, seeking directions for issue of Form 15 declarations, without any delay. Since no action was taken on the basis of the said request also, this writ petition is filed. 2. Considering pendency of the request before the second respondent, I am of the view that a decision need be W.P(C) No.33952 of 2010-T 2 taken by that authority at the first instance. Therefore, I am of the view that the writ petition can be disposed of on issuing necessary directions to the second respondent. 3. The second respondent is directed to consider and to take a decision on Ext.P2, which was submitted, supported with remittance of required fee as evidenced from Ext.P2 challan receipt, dated 27.10.2010, at the earliest possible, at any rate within a period of one week from today. The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. Sd/- C.K.ABDUL REHIM JUDGE //True Copy// P.A to Judge ab W.P(C) No.33952 of 2010-T 3