r~" PETmONER RiSPONDENTS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR ^AfritPemionPCYIIto. 3585 of^2068 Ravi Khanna, S/o. Late Manohar Lai Raut Rai, aged about 45 years, resident of viliage Atoitara, Distrid Janjgir-Champa (CG). Versus 1. The State of Chha sgarh, through ttie Secretery, Department of Revenue, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Building, Raipur (CG). 2. The Collector, Janjglr, District Janjgir Champa (CG). 3. The Sub Divisional OfRcer ®,Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (CG). 4. The Tahsildar, Janjgir, District Janjglr Champa (CG). 5. Shri Ghanshyam Prasad Dhiwar, Revenue Inspector, R.t. Circle, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (CG). 6. Shri Manoj Kumar Ambasht, Patwari, Patwari Halka No.45, Viliage Banart, Tahsil Janjgir, DSstrict Janjgir Champa (CG). (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.) SB: Hon'Me Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Smt. Renu Kochar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Payasi. Panel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on this 30th day of July, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1 to ^State submits that the complaint dated 24-5-2008 (Annexure P/9) filed by the petftjoner before the Collector is pending consideration and the same shall be considered as early as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks. 2) In view of the foregoing, aixording to teamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in thispetition. 3) Accordingly, the petitton is disposed of. — Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ^