IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1311 of 2011 KANHAI PASWAN, son of late Naga Paswan Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22-02-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Aurai P.S. Case No.64 of 2008 registered under Section 302/34 of the I.P.C. Petitioner is main assailant, and it is alleged that he put firearm on the Kanpatti of informant’s husband and sort the fire, as a result of which informant’s husband died in course of his treatment. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in course of investigation it has come to light that on the alleged date of occurrence the petitioner was not present in his village. In my view, the plea of alibi would be considered at the time of trial. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to petitioner, accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected. PN ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)