1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1377 OF 2009 Mr. Jayesh Thakarshi Shah and another ).. Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra and another ).. Respondents Mr. Rajiv Narula i/b Mr. J. Narula & Associates for the Petitioners. Mrs. M. Kajale, Assistant Government Pleader, for Respondent No.1. Mr. R.S. Apte a/w Mr. M.S. Lagu for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 18TH NOVEMBER 2009 P.C. The learned Counsel appearing for the Corporation submits that they have already rejected the plans submitted by the Petitioners vide their letter dated 8th May 2009. Thereafter, the Petitioners have not submitted any revised plans after removing the objections as stated in that letter. However, the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that they had submitted the NOC. However, the other objections could not be complied with at that time. 2 2. It is clear from the above submissions made that the demand of the Corporation in terms of the letter dated 8th May 2009 cannot be said to be, prima facie, unreasonable as fresh NOC from the Fire Brigade Department would have to be submitted. The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that they would provide all the documents stated under the said letter whereafter the Respondent Corporation should consider the application of the Petitioners and pass appropriate orders. 3. We dispose of this Writ Petition with a direction to the Respondent Corporation that in the event the requirements contained in the letter dated 8th May 2009 are complied with by the Petitioners, the Corporation shall deal with the application for approval of plans in accordance with law and preferably pass a reasoned order expeditiously. 4. Writ Petition disposed of. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.