IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 6718 of 2008. Decided on: 28.07.2010. __________________________________________________________ Saroj Bala Gupta. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate For the Respondents. : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Respondent No.4 ex-parte. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that her client stands regularised. Consequently, the present petition is rendered infructuous and the same is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. July 28, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?