IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37635 of 2009 SUDISH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 24.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Allegation against the petitioner is that he tried to tie the rope around the victim’s neck and dragged him. The injury report corroborates the allegation that there was effort to strangulate the victim. To that extent the allegation cannot be wished away at this stage. Submission of learned counsel is that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and at the spur of moment the present incident took place. He further submits that litigation with regard to land is going on for a long period of time between the parties. There are case and counter case in this regard and the petitioner will not take law in his land, if he is enlarged on bail. Keeping the period spent the petitioner in custody, let the petitioner, namely, Sudish Yadav be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Jankinagar P.S. Case No. 131 of 2008. Both the sureties will be executed by immediate blood relations of the petitioner on due identification by the court below. The petitioner will not take law in his hand after release on bail. Petitioner will not intimidate the witnesses - 2 - and shall cooperate in the trial by appearing on each and every date fixed in the case either by himself or through his counsel. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)