IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3478 of 2010 SAMSUNDARI @ SHYAM SUNDARI DEVI,w/o Late Kashinath Chouhan Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the Petitioner :Mr.Ranjan Kr.Dubey, Advocate For the State :Ms.(Dr.)Indiwar Kumari, Addl.P.P. --------- 03/ 09-04-2010 A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Let it be kept on record. Heard the parties. Petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Darauli P.S. Case No.109/2007 dated 22-09-2009, registered under Sections 406/420/467/468/346/347/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that though according to the FIR co-accused Krishna Chauhan as also this petitioner are alleged to be responsible for getting a sale deed executed from the husband of the informant, but the statement of the victim Tejmani Singh has been recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. vide Annexure-2 in which there is no such allegation against the petitioner and the entire allegation is against co-accused Bishwanath Chauhan, the son of the petitioner. By referring to Annexure-3, he submits that co-accused Krishna Chauhan has already been granted bail by the learned court below. In that view of the matter and particularly petitioner being the lady, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today in the above noted case, the above named 2 petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)