IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 4TH APRIL 2008 / 15TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 2841 of 2008(L) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- ABOOBACKER K.M., S/O. MAMMU KULSU, ULLATTIL HOUSE, KAYAL MADATHIL, ANANDAVOOR P.O., THIRUNAVAYA, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.SOMAN SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE REGISTERING AUTHORITY, TIRUR. 2. THE MOTOR VEHICLES INSPECTOR, TIRUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M.R. SABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.2841/2008 L APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF FORM 21, SALE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DEALER. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE BODY BUILDER TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE TEMP.REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 2841 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: APRIL 4, 2008 JUDGMENT The application for registration of a vehicle has been returned with an endorsement that the chassis has been extended by 55 cms. from the approved pattern. Ext.P4 contains the certificate of inspection by the Motor Vehicles Inspector. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner asserts before this court that this is a factual mistake and that therefore the matter needs to be re-examined. 2. If, as stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, a mistake has happened, it is a factual matter to be examined and if there is a mistake, that needs to be corrected. 3. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the 2nd respondent shall, on production of a copy of this judgment, verify once again whether the length of the chassis (No.357251KS2831777) and, if it is found that there is no extension of the approved length as noticed in Ext.P4, the matter will be placed before the 1st respondent for further action on the WP(C) 2841/08 Page numbers application. 4. The 2nd respondent shall complete the process within two weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-