IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.413 of 2009 1. SONE LAL SADA 2. YOGENDRA SADA. BOTH SONS OF LATE DHANI CHANDRA SADA. 3. BUDDU SADA SON OF LATE GOBIND SADA @ SADA. 4. KHAKHNU SADA SON OF LATE GYAN CHAND SADA. 5. DOMAN SADA SON OF LATE SHOUKHI SADA. ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE – MAHISHARI, P.S. AND P.O. – UJIYARPUR, DISTRICT – SAMASTIPUR. -----------PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS. Versus MOSTT. BHOLIA WIFE OF LATE PARMESHWAR SADA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MAHISHARI, P.S. AND P.O. – UJIYARPUR, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR. -------- 1ST PARTY DEFENDANT-OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the petitioners : Mr. Pravin Chandra Prasad, Adv. For the opposite parties : None. ----------- 2. 18/3/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The plaintiffs-petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 22.1.2009 passed by the Munsif, Dalsingh Sarai in Title Suit No. 16 of 2004 whereby his prayer for calling certain original records of Cadestral Survey Khatiyan as well as Malikana Khatiyan has been refused. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in his Malikana Khatiyan, only two persons being son of Shiv Dayal Mushahar has been described wherein Cadestral Survey of Khatiyan, three sons of the same persons have been described. The trial court on due consideration of rival submission has come to the conclusion that certified copies of the documents have already been marked as exhibit, one on behalf of the plaintiff and another on behalf of the defendant and now the hearing on final submissions of both the sides have almost - 2 - been concluded. At this point of time, the petition concerned has been filed. It has further been observed that a petition filed for same purpose already stands disposed of on 13.9.2007. Again another petition with a similar prayer has been filed only with the purpose of causing delay. As a result, court below has dismissed the petition. I do not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order. As a result, this Civil Revision application is dismissed. S.Ali (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)