1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION JUDGES ORDER NO.131 OF 2005 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.467 OF 2000 IN SUM.SUIT NO.4229 OF 1998 Smt.Sanika Mohan Deshpande & Anr. ..Plaintiffs. V/s. Jayant Moreshwar Paranjape. ..Defendant. Mr.Chetan Kapadia i.b. Harakhchand & Co for plaintiffs. Mr.Vijay M. Bhate for defendant. Mr.A.M.Kazi, Dy.Sheriff of Mumbai present. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : SEPTEMBER 28, 2005. DATE : SEPTEMBER 28, 2005. DATE : SEPTEMBER 28, 2005. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Counsel for the defendant submits that he has not received any instruction either to oppose or support this application. Heard counsel for the plaintiff. Order in terms of Judge’s order is granted. 2. In addition, it is directed that seal of the premises be opened in the presence of two panchas. After inspection is completed by the plaintiff in the presence of representative of Sheriff or Sheriff of Mumbai and the said panchas, the premises be resealed 2 and keys be entrusted to the office of Sheriff of Mumbai, to be preserved till further orders. The plaintiff shall provide for watch and ward on the site at their costs, as may be quantified by the office of the Sheriff, Mumbai. 3. The plaintiff shall deposit necessary amount to meet the recurring expenses of watch and ward. The amount so spent will be reimbursed to the plaintiff from the sale proceeds. Plaintiffs undertake to deposit costs to meet the watch and ward expenses with the office of Sheriff within one week from the date of demand thereof.