1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fourth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9405 of 2011 PHILOMINAL ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NO.2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TAMIL UNIVERSITY, THANJAVUR, THANJAVUR DISTRICT IN CR.NO. 2 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.JEGADEESWARAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Addl.Public Prosecutor( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.2 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 341, 498(A) and 506(ii) of I.P.C. in Crime No.2 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is charged under Sections 294(b), 323, 341, 498(A) and 506(ii) of I.P.C. He further submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person. He further submitted that the petitioner is the sister-in-law of the defacto complainant and the case has been registered against two persons and A1 already enlarged on anticipatory bail and she has been falsely implicated in this case and she apprehend for arrest and hence,prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) would submit that a case has been registered after forwarding the petition under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C and the husband of the defacto complainant was already enlarged on bail and marriage was taken place in the year 1994 and two children born to them and investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the marriage between the defacto complainant and the first accused was performed on 21.6.1994 and they begot two female children and both the first accused and the defacto complainant are Government servants and the petitioner is only the sister-in-law and the husband of the defacto complainant as already granted anticipatory bail, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thanjavur, and each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 04/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II,THANJAVUR. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,TAMIL UNIVERSITY,THANJAVUR, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/S. R.JEGADEESWARAN Advocate SR.No.26212 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9405 of 2011 Date :04/08/2011 PA/08.08.2011/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/