IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-12134 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.05.2011 Surender Singh alias Chhinda ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Ms. Rupinder Kaur Thind, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Present petition is filed seeking regular bail in case FIR No.178 dated 19.5.2010 under Sections 395/398 IPC and Sections 25/54/59 Arms Act, Police Station, Ratia. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that no looted item was ever recovered from the possession of the petitioner nor any identification parade was held for identification of the petitioner. She has further stated that petitioner was arrested pursuant to the alleged disclosure statement of co-accused Amarjit Singh. She has further argued that none can be convicted on the basis of disclosure statement of the co-accused, however, co-accused who has suffered the disclosure statement shall be bound by the statement. Learned counsel has further stated that petitioner is in judicial custody w.e.f. 4.9.2010. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct that petitioner be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. (Alok Singh) Judge May 18, 2011 R.S.