IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CASE No.4582 of 2010 1. SMT. BINDA DEVI, WIFE OF LATE BHARAT PODDAR, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA KANHAIYA MISHRA POKHER, P.O. & P.S. LAHERIA SARAI, DISTRICT DARBHANGA. 2. SMT. NIRMALA DEVI, WIFE OF SRI BIRENDRA KUMAR THAKUR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE & P.O. SATLAKHA, P.S. RAHIKA, DISTRICT MADHUBANI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. C. ASHOKVARDHAN, THE PRICIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. SANTOSH KUMAR MALL, THE COLLECTOR, DARBHANGA. 4. BYAS MUNI PRADHAN, THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, DARBHANGA. 5. RAMAN PRASAD VERMA, THE ANCHAL OFFICER BAHADURPUR, DISTRICT DARBHANGA. 6. VANDANA PREYASI, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, 6, PATEL MARG, P.S. SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 7. SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, THE SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, PATNA, 6 PATEL MARG, P.S. SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 8. JAGDISH RAI, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DARBHANGA CIRCLE, BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD PATNA, AT DARBHANGA, DISTRICT DARBHANGA. 9. ANANTSHELL @ SON OF LATE CHANDRAKISHOR NARAIN, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA B-22 JNAKPURI ASHIYANA APARTMENT CHIRA CHAS, P.S. BOKARO, JHARKHAND. 10. SMT RITA SINGH, WIFE OF GANEDRA PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA NEAR ADM QUARTER, V.I.P. COLONY, P.O. AND P.S. LAHERIA SARAI, DISTRICT DARBHANGA. For the petitioner : Mr. Amrendra Narain, Advocate. For the State : G.P.-6. For Opp. Party no.8 : M/s R.S. Pradhan, Sr. Adv., Pankaj Majorwar, Advocate. ---------------------------------- 07. 01.08.2011 In compliance of the orders of the High Court dated 14.05.2010 as also the orders passed in this contempt petition dated 21.07.2011 the lands of the 2 petitioners and the acquired land for the Housing Board were measured and it was found that the lands purchased by the petitioner under sale deed dated 21/22.4.2006 is part of 31 decimals of land which was acquired earlier for the Housing Board and in such view of the matter under orders dated 26.07.2011, Annexure-B to the show cause request of the petitioner for mutation of the lands in question in Mutation Case No.1783-1788/2006-07 has been rejected. This contempt petition is, accordingly, disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to challenge the order dated 26.07.2011. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)