IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10420 of 2010 NARESH DAS @ RAM NARESH DAS . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 22-Apr-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the complainant. Petitioner is father of the alleged deceased. He prays for anticipatory bail in a complaint case lodged by mother-in-law of his deceased son alleging that her son-in-law appears to have been killed by his family members and dead body appears to have been disposed of without information. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the complainant purposely avoided to lodge any case before the police and the present case was lodged after 13 days of the death of the petitioner’s son only when petitioner rejected the proposal of the complainant to marry her widowed daughter with younger son of the petitioner. It has been submitted that there is absolutely no legal evidence in the case and the entire prosecution is mala fide. On the other hand, learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that the co-villagers of the petitioner are not supporting the case hence details cannot be given but it appears that deceased was done to death and did not die a natural death. Considering all the facts and circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks, let the above named petitioner be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jehanabad in connection with Tr.No. 679/2010 arising out of complaint case no. 537/2007 as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)