IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO : 954 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 12/06/2008 in WP NO : 26089 OF 1997 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 Vadla Brahmachary S/o. Late Vadla Narsimha R/o Hafeezpet (V), Serlingampally (M), Ranga Reddy District. 2 Vadla Anantha Chary S/o. Late Vadla Narsimha R/o Hafeezpet (V), Serlingampally (M), Ranga Reddy District. 3 Kammari Brahma chari, s/o Venkaiah, R/o Hafeezpet (V), Serlingampally (M), R.R.Dist. 4 Kammari Kanaka chari, s/o Venkaiah, R/o Hafeezpet (V), Serlingampally (M), R.R.Dist. 5 Kammari Krishna chary, s/o Venkaiah, R/o Hafeezpet (V), Serlingampally (M), R.R.Dist. ..... APPELLANT(S) AND 1 Kommari Shankaraiah S/o. Venkaiah R/o.2-23, Hafizpet (V), Sherilingampally (M), Ranga Reddy District. 2 Kommari Lakshmi Narayana S/o. Venkaiah R/o.2-23, Hafizpet (V), Sherilingampally (M), Ranga Reddy District. 3 Kommari Brahma Chari S/o. Venkaiah R/o.2-23, Hafizpet (V), Sherilingampally (M), Ranga Reddy District. 4 Kommari Kanaka Chari S/o. Venkaiah R/o.2-23, Hafizpet (V), Sherilingampally (M), Ranga Reddy District. 5 Kommari Krishna Chary S/o. Venkaiah R/o.2-23, Hafizpet (V), Sherilingampally (M), Ranga Reddy District. 6 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 7 The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 8 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.UDAYA KUMAR JOSHI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO : 954 of 2008 JUDGMENT ( Per Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard both sides. Learned counsel appearing on either side submitted that the cause in the appeal no more survives and it has become infructuous. Recording the same, the writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous granting liberty to the appellants to raise all their objections in the connected appeal. No costs. _______________ B.PRAKASH RAO,J _______________ R. KANTHA RAO,J DATE:22.9.2008 Tvk