IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.180 of 2009 BIBI ZAHIDA KHATOON Versus MD. SHAMIM ANWAR & ORS ----------- 6. 19.5.2009 Heard. The impugned order has been passed on eviction appeal preferred by the petitioner in 2004 against an order of eviction passed by the Civil Court. The petitioner filed a petition on 11.9.2004 for stay of the execution proceedings. The rejoinder was also timely received by the court below but the petition for seeking stay of the execution proceedings was not pressed and it was pressed after more than four years of the filing of the same. The reasons could be obvious and the attempt could also be discerned therefrom which was to dilate the proceedings as long as the petitioner could succeed on it. It is simply shocking to find that the court which was handed out a decree to execute it, was also contributing to the pendency of the execution proceedings by his lethargy. The revision is dismissed under the above circumstances with a direction to the executing court to proceed with the execution reminding himself that it was a decree seeking the eviction of a tenant from a premises. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )