In the Honble High Court of Judicature of Chhattishgarh at Bilaspur (C.G.) W.P.No. c^l&-^- 2006 ^^^\^ ^^lL^ ^^ ...-•^^'\^ ^^^ ^ Petitioner Respondents ^ Chandra Kumar Deshmukh, aged 29 years Son of Shri Itwari Ram Deshmukh Assistant Teacher, High School, Urla, Block, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.) Versus 1. The State Govemment of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, School Educatioa Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer, Durg (C.G.) for^ ttie issuance of WRIT in the nature of MANDAMUS certwrari, Prohibition and for other Suitable writ or writs, order or onlers. Direction or Directions. XI-HC-22 3IR?I'?ff iW^; SfE^I .*^i+ ^rfgg -\-~ •< 7Sr^lWM4, WTf:OTS, ^^...^^.^ sn^i ?TRnwgfpf q;raferal;i wreff •? 1yet ^? aipaq SD^SI 27A2006 I Shri Ajoy Sirivastwa, Adl/ecate for The petjtionei'. Shrj 6-K. Bsr'wa!, Dy. Adv| Gsn. for the Sta'te. : Meard. I The cose of l+se petitio^er is tha't he te working os AssiSI'ant Teoeher and passed 1+ie 8.EA ^xaminoition in the year 1992-93 on his owrn expenfie^ aid copy of cert|ricate passing of •Hie ^iid examination is Annexur'e P-6. Further ease of 1+ie petitior'er' is Thatcs per policy c-f Sovernment the Assistant T^achers, who have passed tiie B.Ed. examiRution on or before 22.1^.1964, shaiibeentitted for two greide incPements ond the ^saistsint examination aftet- 22-10 1964 entiTled for the Two grads !Rcre.^>,ents. Ths pstitscner heresn has passsd *he 8.Ed. examination in *hs by ths StfT1w ^dmin.istrettiys same to '•i+ie oetitioner. Learned eounsei for the Teaehers, who haye pcoed tha B.Ed. on Their owi'i expenses shail also .ba year 1992-93 cn hia cwn e^penses, therefore, he is entitied for twjs grade increments, which has been heid Tribunai yide. Annexure P-3 in O.A. Nn.179/01 anci aiso erident from the order of Sovsmmenr dated 24.12.1998 (A-inexure P-4), buf the respondents are noT granting-^e petitioner submits that fnerefore, •rtie pe+itioner may oe aHowed t^ n'ahe a deta'led rsyreseptal'ion to respondent No.2 within a perio^l of two wseks' from •i'oday ond in tum ' [^'Sfiaq ^sr -snqRpT, dTtl^'itc, f^nwp sn^fqiT ^n^r *^i°b'Hf?(T y ^. Koshan/- y^ ^/^ ^^ y^ ^&' an^T'reiiwHlttT q?Rfepfr;! 'ciPRif •? fS^ '[iSRZTC ^i-SlfiOT 31RSI respondent No.2 be directed petitioner in accordance with has "o objsction. 1-iaving hcard iearned Ths facts and elrcumstances o counael for +he petitioner <y Tnerefore, the petitioner is' ai, annexino a!l The reievant docuiT of two weeks'from today and ii he has oassed Ihe B.Ed. two grade incremehts to •f+'e No.2 within a period of two representaTioii. Wi'rii •tfts direction afcrs^ Cerf'ified copy as- per rule 'a^ couhsei oigtsears ntent; examirfation 'eB to cfecide ihe representation of the ', To which tearned coynsei forthe Stats for the parties and having regard to o|f the cose, The proyer ma.de by ieamed to be fajr, iust ond r-egsonabie. jowed to make a detailed representation n(ents to respondent No.2 wiThin a periOd the pstitioner' satisfies the critet'ia that on his owi expenses, then gront of ^titioner be eonsidewd by the respondent n^onths from the date of rBceipt of the fcrs^ajd, the petition stands disposed of. Sdf- L.C. Bhadoo judge ['^ ?Ra<i '^ ^