5861 ItJll^bJlE fUi4!')S^^SW/r!M^^ <4 ^f^f^f^vufSK^-- tiHs'fil 'IWnqiii •wp.'sws'd't •Mtytl>?H TO^ "^"ss"'"w ^ ...^..^^..^^^^ f©^'OA' unttBf' as^Jffi •fctli^h ItUky laJt2-)jS iyjfc ttSJ.JlE fcHJK t^jgfatt <aiyy±i£|el • teiAVt ^ 'kJtefi^ *<6 *^te •&E ihy 'Jls •1S iiUltt Ojfitt • 'My.fi jifite Sej •1-UA^t fcUJlE O^Ott 'ltJfey tflJte."6iy-lteo^£ 6d~ ly-llstty-lK 'uyy - j^ia fcttlti ^l ~2Sy iokoas ^ias-jyy '^a jyjli ojtt0£ ^aib fa^tUtE 'ioi&a^te *^B09-rfe 3ft4,ldig4,A '&A SdQ 3jy -i^Jtt^ -^SJ9C^rY?, ^fiui 'di^'aij.iE fiyiuttjf te&jiji ojfott t^!±faJU RttU •^' < ^ I-HC—78 CT^T^Tf^IW WTSD^igiTliEi; ST^i<ii^T,'s-Ti^m®,f^rrey ^..lf.:.f:.L€.?...p!':.;M.S5/iL^ 3^r'<ra^ (13?f3^ti) WWdfTO 311^1 wferfNiiroff iffs^Tte^ ^••aifTOsii^r SB^: Hon'ble Siiri IVIanindraMohari ShrivasSava, J. 30-06-2010 Ms. Poonam Patel, oounsel fct the petitioner. Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel Lavifer Itar the State/respondents. Heard. The case of the petitioner is tfiat v/hile working as Lecturer In Tribai Welfare Department, vide order d^ted 31-07-2000 (Annexure A-2), he was promoted to the post of Princtial. However, the order of promotion mentioned the present ptace of p^sting as Higher Secondan' Schooi, Manendragarh, District Surguja, |Afhereas the petitioner was actually working at that time in Govemmen( Narhardeo Higher Secondary School, Kanker. ]t is submitted that bec^use of this anomaly in the order of promotion, the petitioner was not r^lieved tojoin at his place of posting on the post of Principal. During the course of argumf was stated by the learned couns^ 31-07-2000 (Annexure A-2) cont[ •nts before this Court on 18-03-2009, it for the respondents that order dated ined typographical error and on that ground, time v»asgranted to the S^ate counsel to verify the facts and pass appropriate order and further fil^ an affidavit. indicating the fact as to whether the petitioner is grante;( salary of the post of Prinoipal, High School or not. Thereafter, the Fe^pondents have now filed an affidavit of the Secretar/, Tribal Welfare Depjartment as also the copy of order dated 20-05-2010, by which, earlier orsfer of promotion has been modified apd the petitioner has been treated a^ promoted to the post of Principai from Y, Btns-i:, ,;.-®^^ ..^"...•"id8' Ifc.. '< 'i •••8.as*is sii^iw ft'ti* w sv^y aiiiis ^ST •<ii''-iifi<i, ®Tii<rf'is,fs«ni<-il{,< _^..^ixi.t^.^4.s?//0^ st^w'v^ (1}?f3aR!?) TOISW ^tei sn^i —'^,- 31-07-2000 and applying the prin^ petitioner's case has been closed. From the sequenoe of events passed by the respondents, it is c 'committed on account of the mi petitioner could not join on the post order dated 31-07-2000. Now the petitioner could not be denied salary "No work No pay" has no application. Accordingly, the petition is benefits to the petitioner, as if the petjtioner Principal with effect from 31-07-2000.1 difference of pay also. Pay ofthe petiti3ni of the Principal with effect from oonsequential benefits shall follow. 4ill(?riFt WM? 'if fS^t tFn<^K ^•sffiiHani^! ^iple of "No work No pay", the (^g |and after perusat of the order novv ;l^ar that the irregularity has been st^ke of the respondents and the |of Principal though promoted vide petitiqner has been retired. The ^nd in such a case the princlple of ^llowed. Respondents shali give was promoted on the post of The petitioner vvoutd be entitled to ;r shall be fixed on the pay scale 131-07-2000 and on that basis, SdA ManindraMohanShrivastava Judge y^-- WIO'flfl ^slhl 1s;"lld<:.<W-l;<iTi<»—FS/ffi—2/2010 —1,00,000.