IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M- 11226 of 2008 Date of decision:-9.5.2008. Amit Kumar ...Petitioner. Versus The State of Haryana ...Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Sandeep Boora , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Ghengas, DAG, Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the FIR the name of the petitioner is not there which was recorded on the statement of Twinkey Bhutia with the allegation that on 9.3.2008 at about 9.15 p.m. some unknown person had physically assaulted her. It was only 2 days thereafter the name of the petitioner was mentioned in the supplementary statement recorded on 11.3.2008 without disclosing the source from where she came to know that the petitioner had assaulted on 9.3.2008 and how did she recognise him. Without opining on the merits of the controversy, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that in case of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. He shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for investigation. He shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. May 9, 2008 (RAJESH BINDAL) ritu-II JUDGE