CRM-M No. 16694 of 2011 **** Raj Kumar vs. State of Punjab and others Present: Ms.Jatinder Jit Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in Complaint Case bearing No. 2832-T of 9.6.2008 titled as Barjinder Kophli v. Raj Kumar, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act pending in the Court of JMIC, Patiala. Learned counsel states that the petitioner admits the cheque dated 02.05.2011 and is ready to deposit the same with interest but the real fact is that he was never served and that is why he did not appear and was declared a proclaimed offender. Undertakes to appear before the Court on the next date and deposit the amount whichever may be found due so that the case can be finally concluded. In the circumstances arrest of the petitioner is stayed till then. Of course, in case the petitioner does not hounour this undertaking, this order shall be deemed to have been withdrawn. In case the petitioner appears before trial Court on 03.06.2011 along with the deposit of ` 30,000/-, the trial court will accept the bail bonds. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE May 27, 2011 sunita