C.W.P. No.15956 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.15956 of 2011 Date of Decision.29.08.2011 Narinder Singh son of Sh. Hari Singh, resident of H.No.105, Ram Kishan Colony, Ambala Cantt. .....Petitioner Versus Central Bank of India, Mahesh Nagar, Ambala Cantt. Through its Branch Manager and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Suneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The only challenge in the writ petition is to the possession notice, which is issued and the further action taken under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act. The petitioner will have appropriate remedy by means of an appeal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act. The petitioner's grievance still further is that he made such an appeal previously but it was not entertained. The petitioner is bound to satisfy the particular Forum, which is competent to receive the appeal and if there is any order, which speaks adversely to his attempt, he shall have a further remedy by means of an appeal under Section 19 of the SARFAESI Act before the DRAT. If there is any delay in filing the appeal, the time taken by the petitioner in his bona fide prosecution before the Authority at DRT previously and later before this Court, the petitioner C.W.P. No.15956 of 2011 -2- may seek for exclusion of the time taken and if such a request is made, the same will be considered by the DRAT and entertain the appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner also contended that there is no loan outstanding. It will still be a matter of adjudication before the DRT and not before this Court. 3. With these observations, the writ petition is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 29, 2011 Pankaj*