@ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR gHMTISGARH) WRIT PETITION No. g g9 4‘ 12003 / PETITIONERS 1. Prem Uraon, son of Shri Munnu Uraon, aged about 36 years. 2. Disiya, son of Kandra Uraon, aged about 36 years. 3. Kandru son of Soharayee Uraon, aged abo 35 years. Kenda Ram aged about 50 years son of Shri Lundra 5. Mahesh son of Dhaneshwar Yadav, aged aout 37 years. All are residet of village 'shringa, Tah. Daramjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, MANTRALAYA, DAU KALYAN SINGH BHAWAN, RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH); THE CONSERVATOR OF FOEST, BILASPUR DIVISION, BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) DISTRICT COLLECTOR, RAIGARH (CHHATTISGARH) DISTRICT FOREST SETTLEMENT OFFICER, DISTT. RAIGARH . TROUGH (CHHATTISGARH) D .F. O. RAIGARH THE ‘DISTRICT FOREST OFFICER, DISTT. RAIGARH (CHHATTISGARH) ;THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, (FOREST), DHARAMJAIGARH, DISTT. RAIGARH (con 7. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (REVENUE) DHARAMJAIGARH, DISTT. RAIGARH (CHHATTISGARH). ut b n Si h R H / 8. THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER DHARAMJAIGARH, DISTT. RAIGARH (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT F INDIA PETITION FOR UNDER ARTICLES 226 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION MANDAMUS O CERTIORARI ISSUANCE ORDER OF WRIT ORDERS IN THE DIRECTION NATURE OF DIRECTIONS PROHIBITION ETC. \ 0 1) PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONERS: 1 W 4' ‘ AJJW ‘- XI~HC-22 6W W mm ..............N.033%{0 ..............................................W ................................................ WWW WWW Wm $ am 311%“ 13.02.2094 Petitioners by Shri AN. Bhakm, Shn' Ranbir Singh, Govt. Advo The petitionars havs prafeITe Article 226/227 of the ConStitution the respondents be directed to eettl Foseession of the petitionerS. The peh'h'onere’ case is that tribe community except petitioner persone and permanently resid' Dhaxamjaigarh, District Raigarh an have improved certain piece of fores compartment No.298 and 299. The mat land since 24/ 10/ 1980 and proved this land and they h proving the same and now there ey may be dispossessed from that Learned counsel for the pe etitioners may be allowed to make r spondent No.4 & 5 and in turn th e representation, to which le . jection. Having heard the learned c aving regard to the facts and circ etitioners are allowed to make a their pleas and grievances before Advocate. ‘ate for the Stats. this Wxit Petition undsr of India, seeking reh‘ef that the foreet land which is in they belong to ab-Qriginal No.5. They are landless g at Shishringa, Tehsil by their ham labour they land into agricultural land etitioners are in possession un’ng this period they have ve incurned expenses in is every apprehension that and. ‘tioners submits that the detailed representation to y may be directed to decide ed State counsel has no unsel for the parties and nnstances of the case, the fujrther representation raising respondent No.4 8r. 5 within / XI-HC—22 15 days from today axml the that after receipt of the their conductgd basgd on th€ rep decide the same by an appro; looking to pnevaih'ng practice4 respondent No.4 & 5 axe directed representation will get an enquiry Iesentation of the petitioners and axiate order in an objective manner > and rights of the petitioners. With the above directio In View of this orde , M.W.P. No.3498/2003 5r, IA N0, 1 1,348,’ 2003 for urgent h ah'ng stand disposed of. / Certified copy as per r s the petition stands diSPosed of. s. ’ ’- / sd/— ‘ L.c.BHAD00 Judge [eeeieér ‘7