;5??*3^??^^1;S- t © c /- / /?rZ>^— milIEJH^H^OlJRTOFCmiATnStlABHATBIL.^PUR fo..^. W.P. (s) No. ^^.........J2W PETmONES.-k. ^Makhanlal Thakur S/o Shri Baisakhu Ram ..,<^..- .../ Thakur Aged about 40 years. Post - ^:?'"' .••'' Assistant - Teacher Govt. Primary School ii->>T\'>i\?"^.Y Badara Tola, Blok- Chhuria District ...-•yy' i.s'^-' Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS t^SPONDENTS :^1: State of Chhattisgarh Throv^ Secretary Department of Educatiofl Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CXKf _^^^^\\ / ^' District Education Officer, Chhuria, District f>^\ (, l" ^^ Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^' fk- 3: Block Education Officer Block — Chhuria District-Rajnandgaon (C.G»)? »,0 WRIT PETITION U/A 226/27r0F THE CONSTnUTIONOF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WMTS IN THE NATUREOF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT^AND DmECTIQNS The above named petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under:- HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ASM AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HOhFBLEJAR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WMT PETTTION tS.) N0 464 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Hemrai Kumbhkar State of Chhatt'isgarh and o-thers WRTT PETTTION (S.) N0. 465 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Resoondents Siddharth Choure Stale of Chhattisgarh and o-thers WRTT PETTTION (S.) N0. 466 OF 2007 Petjtioner verajs Respondents Pcnch Ram 5ahu State of Chhatt'isgarh and olhers WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 467 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versys Manharon Lal Pithaura State of Chhatl-isgarh ond ol+iers WRTT PETETION fS.l N0. 468 OF 2007 Petjtioner versys Resoondents Yoggaya Datht Bcghel State of Chhattisgarh and o-thers WRTT PETTTION fS/1 N0. 469 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Respondents Shib Khaperctay State of Chhorttisgarh ond otiiers WRTT PETmON IS.) N0. 470 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Resoondents Radhey Kishun Patel Stnte of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner WRTT PETmON (5.) N0. 471 OF 2007 AAanganLul versus Respondents : State of Chhntt'isgarh and others WRFT PETmON tS.) N0. 472 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Dhal Swigh Sonwuni State of Chhaf'isgarh ond o-thers WRTT PETTTION (S.) N0. 473 OF 2007 Petitioner : Onkar Lail Sonboir versus Respondents : Stirte of Chhattisgarh ond o-thers WRTT PFTTTION (S.) N0. 474 OF 2007 Petitioner : Shiv Kumar Sharma wrsys Resoondents : State of Chhattisgarh and o-thers WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0. 47B OFaOQZ Petitioner Resbondents versus Rajendra Kumar Sagar State of Chhatt'isgarh ond others WRTT PFTmON (5.1 N0. 476 OF 2007 1G^) l?-'^ Petjtioner Makhanhl Thakur versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ouid others WRITPETTnON (5.1 N0. 477 OF 2007 Petitioner yerais Respondents Fool Chand Kamleshtwr State of Chhottisgarh ond olhers WKTT PETmON (S.^ N0. 478 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Respondents Rajendra Kumar Dewongan State of Chhattisgarh and others And WRTT PETTTION IS.) N0. 479 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Jayant Kumar Shendey State of Chhatt-isgarfi and o'thers 1. Present : Mr. R.K. Joiswal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sushil Dubey, fiovemment Advocate for the Stal'e/reqaondents. ORDER Passed on 24th Oay of January, 2007) Learned counsel eppearing for -the petitioners as we\\ as leamed fiovemment Advocate appearing for the State/reqwndents jointly submit that 1he facts ond question of law involved in the present batch of writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Courl- m the case of y»sh»wvtKumw WMradwoj vs. Munle^al CwpatWtiwi, t^ry and anortM1'. 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (jSiopss/i Kumar frtowflvs. Th»Stats 6wt. af ChhaHisgarh and cuwftiw) ond o-ther connected matters, decided by this s, Court on 15-12-2006. pursuant to the mwno dated 28-1-1995, isajed by the Secretary, Board of Secondury Education, Bhopat and -the prospectus of biploma in Education Examination. it was ctarified •that •the nomenclature of the Bosic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been chonyd cnd renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., &.Ed. Accordmgly, •the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 {jSopedi Kumar Vermavs. The Slate Sovt. of Chhattisgat4i andcawthei) (Supra). 3. For -the aforeroentioned reasons, •the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of -this Court in the matter of yashwant Kumar fifron»<A*Ky (Supra), aibject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.T.I./D.Ed. Cert'ificates at their own expenses as per the circubrs dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whe-ther Ihey have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of •this order be ptaced on •the record of •the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 Z006CTDMPJR-C696 Thakur