M 1@‘ 'IN THE'HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C‘.G.) 3:? {2 200 W.P.(S! No ............. l 9 f“ PETITIONER: Smt. Anita Bharajdwaj Aged about 38 Years W/o Shri Lalun Bharajdwaj R/o Gram and Post— Chind District— Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. State'of Chhattisgarh Through Secreta ry Agriculture (Fisheries) Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) er” 2. Assistant Director Fisheries Raigarh (C.G.) (I; 3. B.U.Kazi S/O Shri H.U. Kazi Aged about 47 years Office of the Assistant Director, Fisheries, Janjgir, ,District- Janjgir Champa (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS: 1._ PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: HEGH CQURT OF CHHATTESGH A? ERASPUR {Han Mr. Justiae Pmmker Diwakeh'} Wk’ii P‘etmon (S) No. 3312 0f 2W9 PETITEONER Smt. Anita Bharajdwaj VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others. $hri Mateen SiddEqui, counseé for the petitioner. Ku. Sunita Jain, PL for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (10.01am) finaliy. With the consent of the counsei for the parties, the matter is heard Chaiienge in this petition is to the order dated 29.6.2009 (Annexure P-t) passed by respondent No.1 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from the office of Assistant Director, Fisheries, Raigarh to ofnce of the Assistant Director, Fisheries, Raipur. Contention of the counsei for the petitioner is that the husband of the petitioner is a Govt. employee and working as Shiksha Karmt, Grade—ii at Sarangarh. He submits that though in the order of the petitioner, her posting has been shown at Raigarh but in fact she is working at Sarargarh and on account of issuance of the impugned transfer order family iife of the petitioner wouid be disturbed. He however submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make representation. He also seeks a direction to the authorities concerned to decide the said representation expeditiously. To this prayer of the petitioner, counsel for the respondents/$tate has no objection. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. if the petitioner makes a representation within a period of 15 ,days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same would be ‘decided by the authorities cancerned within a further period of three weeks from the date of its receipt strictly in accordance whir/law f ‘ ' ‘ Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ‘I i I