IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2405 of 2008 1. Satyendra Kumar Sinha, son of Shree Subash Prasad Sinha, resident of Village Makhdumpur, P.O. Paithna, P.S. Islampur, District Nalanda. 2. Renu Kumari, D/o Gopal Mahto, resident of Village Benipur, P.O. & P.S. Ekangarsarai, District Nalanda………………………….…………..Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Secretary-cum- Commissioner, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Primary Education, Sitamarhi. 4. The District Education Officer, Sitamarhi. 5. The District Superintendent of Education, Sitamarhi. 6. The Bihar School Examination Board, Sinha Library Road, Patna, through its Secretary. 7. The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Sinha Library Road, Patna. 8. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Sinha Library Road, Patna. 9. The Secretary, Central Sharirik Shaikshik Prashikshan Parishad (Physical Training College), Sitamarhi. 10. The Principal, Central Sharirik Shaikshik Prashikshan Parishad (Physical Training College), Sitamarhi……………………………..Respondents ----------- 2 15.03.2011 Two petitioners have filed this writ application jointly with slightly different prayer. Petitioner no.1 has prayed that his certificate of D.P. Ed Examination held for the Sessions 1985- 86 from Central Sharirik Shikshak Prashikshan Parishad (Physical Training College), Sitamarhi be issued, for 2 which he has been issued marks sheet. The prayer of petitioner no.2 is to publish her result and issue the certificate in respect of C.P. Ed. Examination held for the Sessions 1988- 89 in which she appeared from the same institution. In respect of the stand of petitioner no.1, photo copy of the admit card and marks sheet issued by the Bihar School Examination Board are annexed as Annexures 1 and 2 and in respect of the stand of petitioner no.2, photo copy of the admit card has been annexed as Annexure-3. The Board has filed counter affidavit in this case. It is stated in the counter affidavit that the claim of both the petitioners that they appeared in the respective course and respective sessions from the University is not established from the tabulation register of the Board and names of the candidates of such roll numbers, as claimed by the petitioners, do not tally from the tabulation register. 3 In view of such stand of the Board on affidavit, this Court does not find any merit in the writ application. The same is dismissed. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)