1 fa1174 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.1174 OF 2011 Ismail Gafoor Shaikh & Anr. ...Appellants vs. Union of India through the General Manager,Central Railway, Mumbai ...Respondent Mr.Kuldip Singh for the appellants Mr.T.J.Pandian with Mr.Manoj Chatke for the respondent CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JULY 1, 2011 P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Considering the narrow controversy involved in the Appeal, the same is taken up for final disposal at admission stage. 2 Application invoking section 124-A of the Railways Act,1989 has been dismissed by the learned Member of the Railway Claims Tribunal on the ground that a copy of the Original Application along with relevant documents has not been supplied by the Appellants to the Central Railway. 3 The learned counsel for the appellants states that a true copy of the Original Application along with true copies relevant documents have been supplied today to the Advocate for the respondent in this Court. 4 Thus, a substantial compliance has been made by the Appellants with the technical requirement. 5 Hence, I pass the following order : 2 fa1174 i) Impugned order is quashed and set aside and the claim application filed by the appellants is restored to the file of the Railway Claims Tribunal. ii)The claim application shall be decided by the concerned Tribunal in accordance with law. iii)First Appeal is allowed on above terms. JUDGE