IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3780 of 2010 1. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH CABINET SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. HOME SERCETARY, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 3. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE(C.R.P.F.), GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 4. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL(GROUP CENTRE), CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE(C.R.P.F.), SINDRI DHANBAD(JHARKHAND). 5. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, C.R.P.F., GAYA. 6. COMMANDANT, RECRUITMENT BOARD, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE(C.R.P.F.) 22, BATTALIION(C.R.P.F.) HAZARIBAGH(JHARKHAND). 7. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER(D.T.O.) MOTOR VEHICLE DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT MON, STATE NAGALAND. Versus SUMAN KUMAR, SON OF SHRI BAIJU PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NERUT, P.O. NERUT, P.S. SARE, DISTT. NALANDA, STATE BIHAR. With MJC No.1919 of 2010 SUMAN KUMAR, SON OF SHRI BAIJU PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILALGE NARUT, P.O. NARUT, P.S SARAI, DISTT. NALANDA STATE BIHAR. Versus 1. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH CABINET SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. SRI VIKRAM SHRIVASTAVA SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY POSTED AS DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE(C.R.P.F.), C.G.O. COMPLEX, LODI ROAD, NEW DELHI. 3. SRI C.B.S. RATHOURE, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY POSTED AS INSPECTOR GENERAL, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE(C.R.P.F.), B/S, RAJEEV NAGAR, PATNA. 4. SRI N.B.BHOSLEY, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY POSTED AS DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, C.R.P.F., GROUP CENTRE, SINDRI DHANBAD. 5. SRI ALOK RAJ SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER PRESENTLY POSTED AS D.I.G.(C.R.P.F.), A/SINDRI, DHANBAD. 6. PARBHANJAN KUMAR, COMMANDANT-CUM PRESIDING OFFICER, C.R.P.F., RECRUITMENT BOARD, 22, BATTALIION, BAZAR SAMITY, HAZARIBAGH(JHARKHAND). ----------- 04. 15.04.2011 Counsel for the petitioner Union of India states that modification application has been filed for 2 modifying the order dated 5.2.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No.368 of 2010, alleging non-compliance whereof M.J.C. No.1919 of 2010 has been filed and both the present modification application and M.J.C. No.1919 of 2010 be disposed of as during the pendency of these two petitions order dated 5.2.2010 has been complied with, which is mentioned in the show cause reply filed today annexing the order dated 3.11.2010 issued in compliance of the orders of this Court dated 5.2.2010. In view of the statement made by the counsel for the Union of India and the order dated 3.11.2010, I dispose of both the petitions. Rajesh/ (V. N. Sinha, J.)