?§&Q§E E‘ggEu ”my.” $§m§ia Emw q \Jt BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I'I'ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. .l I4/2oog,’ /S.S. Bhadoriya, aged ‘ about 49 years, son of Shri Kripal Singh‘ Bhadoria, resident of Qtr No. 1/B-40, Kirandul, Distt. South Bastar, Dantewada (Chhattisgarh) P ETITIONER VERSUS ESPONDENTS 1. ix National Mineral Deveiopment Corporation Limited, through It’s Chairman, Head Office, Hyderabad Mazab (Masab) Tank, Castle Hiil, Hyderabad (Andhrapradesh) //2’. The General Manager, N.M.D.C. Bailadila Iron Ore Project, Deposit No.14, Kirandul, Distt. South Bastar, Dantewada (Chhattisgarh) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 R/W ARTICLE 227 OF HE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN HE NATURE OF» CERTIORARI MANDAMUS PROHIBITION ND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, ORDER OR i RDERS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS: R W T T A O XI—HC—22 WW,W,W Wm w P No \m W ‘ Wmwm ' WW§E¢W émawm 18-07-2005 I.A.No.260/2005 — This is an application for urgent hearing. Application is allowed. W.P.Ko. 1 14f 2005 Heard Shri R.N.Jha, learn ed counsel for the petitioner and bhri P S Kosny, counsel for the respondents By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the validity of the termination order contained in Annexure P-l dated 12.12.2004. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that admittedly this order is an appealable order and prays s ’ (s‘v that he wants to withdraw this, petition with a liberty to file appeal before the appellate authority. This oral prayerlmade by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by counsel for the respondents. Prayer is allowed. This petition is permitted be withdrawn with a liberty 'to the petitioner to file an a peal before the appropriate authority prescribed under the es. Counsel for the petition r also prays that. by now limitation for nling appeal h expired, therefore, some observations may be made in thi regard. Needless to emphasis at if the law permits for condonati'ori of delay in hling the appeal, the same may he tiled retammg a Photostat co y of the same w1thin 3 days Irom today. ’ Sd/— Sunil Kumar Sinha C.C. as per rules. XI-HC—22 3am, m,W m ..... . ...... .. w 200 ............ .. ...... ..... W ..... Jw. .. .\‘.\’!\. ‘\ A ziwr’emm H $W" 4%@‘é§ #2, by the petitioner by availing such provsions and if such an the would consider the exigency arises; appkHate authority ”Q1 matter and dispose of the; same in accordance with law. With the observations, this stands i; aforesaitE observations, petition finally disposed of Learned counsel $r the petitioner submlts that the Document P— ii) be returned to ntm The said (Annexure may document may be return d to counsel for the petitioner after