IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40113 of 2010 1. RAJENDRA PRASAD VERMA 2. JITENDRA KUMAR VERMA 3. UPENDRA KUMAR VERMA 4. SATYENDRA KUMAR VERMA 5. BHUPENDRA KUMAR VERMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 09-11-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Although the case is only u/s 379 of the IPC which is non bailable but considering that brother of petitioner no.1 who was in Army service has levelled serious allegation that lock of his room in the village home was broken and articles kept for his daughter’s marriage were removed by these petitioners the learned Sessions Judge rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail. This court also does not find it to be a proper case for grant of anticipatory bail. The prayer is rejected. Since all the five petitioners are brother and nephews of the informant, in the interest of justice and to give them an opportunity to settle their differences with the informant, it is observed that in case the petitioners surrender within ten weeks and satisfies the court below, 2 that is, C.J.M., Buxar in Brahmpur PS case no. 150/2008, that they have compromised their differences with the informant in that event, they shall be allowed bail on the date of surrender itself. Otherwise, the petitioners prayer for bail shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. If cost is deposited, let this order be communicated to C.J.M., Buxar in Brahmpur PS case no. 150/2008 by fax. BKS/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)