IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5997 of 2011 NANDAN KUMAR THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 25.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in compliant case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the D. P. Act. The marriage was performed in 2008. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner filed informatory petition on 15.05.2009 and on 16.05.2009 divorce case was filed in which notices were issued to the complainant on 19.05.2009 when the present complaint was filed on 14.12.2010. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that by abducting the petitioner, the marriage was performed. Considering the fact that the divorce case was filed at earlier point of time, let the petitioner pay Rs. 1,000/- by depositing the same in the account of the 2 complainant from June, 2011. The aforesaid payment will be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial or maintenance proceedings. Let the learned counsel for the petitioner serve a copy of this order to the complainant. It is expected that the complainant will supply bank account number to the learned counsel for the petitioner within two weeks from today. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 1422C of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Begusarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)