!£if^i^ S^; ?'•"?. SSNVI i- H?-£ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH PETITIONER W.P.(S) No. <S&4^ / 2006 Dinesh Kumar Pandey, S/o. Shri .0 ...^^^"^Shridhar Pandey, aged about 42 years, /7?.-^'-',/>&" > Assistant Teacher, Govt. '-.••••"^\^'"i\.--'" •—-—- •—-—, :..-^" ...yr<?-stfs' School, Fareednagar Bhilai, ^.-^^ ^^^..- --..--., . -.---..-0-. -....-., Distt.- Durg (C.G.) ^b-^- VERSUS RESPONDENTS •."* ^ . ^\^ ^^ ,v 1. State of Chhattisgrh, /••' Through - The Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director, Public Instruction Department, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur 3. District Education Officer Durg, Distt.-Durg (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Durg^ Distt. - Durg (C.G.), WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONST1TUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER. ^a^ XI-HC-78 'Swl rt||<)l(1t|, ®T(1*i'IS,l°t<ytl«t< w T.OTfNTe.teRiy^, ,^ /^,^Q ^ p.'^^"T^^^bo< *ll*lWlSh*ll<t» W^ 200 sn^r'raw (ipfg^Ef) 3n^T?iT^riq? cisiTsn^rsh^i* ^BTWnfttTSn^T »i<itci<fl-i•<ii«T^:te<3'<Ri«i< ^3:rf^T3ii^r 06,12.2006 Shri Vimn Tiwari. tearned couri Smt. Anju Aahuja, tearned G.f sel for the petitioner. ^. for the State/respendent. By this petition under Articlesi [the petitioner seeks a direction to th| |and seniority on the basis ofthe dat| |of the decision rendered by the Uabalpur in Original Application No. |others Vs. State of M.P. and others) 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India, ^ respondents to pay the increments ^ of his initial appointment in the light lelarned State Administrative Tribunal, 12745/1989 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 iDated 24.8.1992 ;2. Leamed counset appearing fo|' urder dated 9 October 2006 passe^ !5473/2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sharma and others) and in Writ Petition (S)| iState of Chhattisgarh and others)| |simitarty situated, therefore, the simil^r i|" the petitioner placed retiance on the bythis Court in Writ Petition (S) No. ^nd another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh |No. 5474/2006 (Jai Nath Bajpai Vs. and submits that the petitioner is order may be passed. |3. The case ofthe petitioner is| rTeachef-in th& School Education |two years with the fbced salary. lyears' probation, the petitioner was [regular pay scale. Other similariy lAdministrative Tribunal, Jabalpur foi rTribunal vide order dated 24.8.' ^nade severat representations to |that he was appointed as Assistant Detsartment on probation for a period of How^ver, later on, after completion oftwo itegutarized but, he was not given the Isituated teachers moved the State regular pay-scale, wherein leamed atlowed the same. The petrtioner accbrd the same treatment as he is also 199)2 r.i.O. XI-HC-78 sn^r^T^iN; (rai3tI^T3ilIW '^ f ^L_A *TWctT ShHlcb 3^ '<ll'41fl<l, ©Td.WIS,ftdltfy . ^.^-^.w l^o/oc- ^[ 200 3n^?rq?ra? ('pigg^r) S^trRRdfersii^r ^-- iRPlfepft-T IWRft'ff tofl'rf^RZTC ^isrfwran^r similarly situated, but, the respo)idents have not paid any heed. Thus, this petition. 4. Learned counsel for the be allowed to make a represe treatment to the petitioner and ; to other similarly situated teacl Administrative Tribunal dated 2. Ipetitioner submits that the petitioner may htation to respondent No.1 to give similar |ame pay-scale which has been sanctioned ^ers on account of the order of the State t.8.1992, to which learned counsel for the respondent/State hasno objecti]on. 5. Having heard learned cojunsel for the parties and having regard to the faets and circumstances of|the case, in the opinion of this Court.the limited prayer made by leameip counsel for the petitioner appears to be reasonabte. Therefore, the petif|ioner is allowed to make a representation within a period oftwo weeks fro|m today to respondent No.1, raising all his grievances and, in turn, re|spondent No.1 shall decide the said representation in an objective ntianner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of such repre^entation, a'fterconsidering all the points raised by the petitioner and tak]ng into account the order dated 24.8.1992 passed by the learned State Ad(ninistrative Tribunal in Original Application No. 2745/1989. | 6. The writ petition is ac^ordingly disposed of with the aforesaid direction. No order asto costs. 7. Certified copy as per rule|s. Sd/- Dhirednra Mishra Judge P.T.O,