IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43110 of 2010 MAYA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.12.2010. Heard Sri Rajeev Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri Madanjeet Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the informant as well as Sri D.Mehta, learned counsel for the State. Considering the act the petitioner has indulged in to, the initial mind of the court was to refuse her prayer for bail because being a lady, she was handed over the administration of a school to be run, But she was indulging in an inappropriateness of the kind of embezzling its funds. However, considering that all witnesses have been examined and only an expert who had compared some admitted writings with some disputed ones, the court believes that there could be the least chance of tampering of the evidence. In the above view of the matter and considering further that the lady-petitioner is in custody for more than two years, I direct the above named petitioner to be 2 admitted to bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Manoj Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Hilsa(Nalanda) in Hilsa P.S.Case No.66 of 2008/G.R.No.200 of 2008. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)