^ ''sgs-sas. Vs. 3. Sm.t. Rashiai Agrawal, aged about 38 years, 'JV/o. Shri Sudbir Mofaaa Agrawal, R/o. Purani Basti, Raipur, (CG) Muiucipal Corporation, Raipur, A body uicoi-porated under Section-7 of M.P.Municipal Corporation Act, 1956, haviag it's office at Malviya Road, Raipur, distt. Raipur (CG) Tbe •Join.t Director, Town and Countiy Planniag Departinent, Raipui- (CG) TIie Raipiir Development Aufhorit}', Raipur(CG5 COMSTITUTIOii OF iNDIA (SS: Honlale Mr. SatishK._Agaihot»L_J.l Shri M.K.Bhaduri, bouiisel for the petitioner. Shri Asbisb. Shrivastava, counsel for respondents No. 1 & 3. Shri Sur;rakant Mishra, Paael Lawyer for th( State/respondent No.3. ^7) (Passed on this 15th day of November 2007) Learaed coiinsel appeafiag for the petitioner submits that fhe petitioner does not waat to press fhis petition at this stage. However, he subinits" fhat fhe peutioner be penuitted to aiake a fresh representation. to the respondents/aufhoriues tbr consideration and decision in accordance with law to which leamed counsel appeariag for tiie respondeats have no objection. 2. Accordingly ttie petition is disposed of. 1 "\ .3*%.. .. ?;'""^ ^ <^.^^'^- ?3 \ ^y/ 3. -2- lu fhe event, fhe petitioner niakes a representation to the respondents/aufhorities, fhey are directed to consider the sarne and pass appropriate order iu accordance with law wifhia a period of two nionfhs froiu the receipt of representation filed by fhe petitioner, ifso advised. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge •buguna ,,wSSSV'^ J:.!;S<W1