1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1399/2008 (Major Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of order :: 10.03.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.Sushil Bishnoi, for the petitioner. Mr.Trilok Joshi, for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By way of filing present writ petition, the petitioner is challenging Annexure-P/10 dated 30.01.2008, which is said to be passed on the basis of order dated 07.08.2007 passed learned Divisional Commissioner, Bikaner. According to learned counsel for the respondents, against the said order passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Bikaner, the petitioner has already filed a revision petition before the Revenue Board. It is apparent on the face of record that the impugned order has been passed in compliance of the order passed by the Divisional Commissioner, which is observed in the 2 order itself. Therefore, I see no reason to interfere with the order impugned. However, the petitioner may file an application before the Revenue Board in the revision petition filed by him and apprise the Revenue Board that though the subject matter of this order is altogether different but the Tehsildar has evicted him without following the due process of law. Upon filing the said application, the Revenue Board may decide the same within a period of 15 days from the date of filing of the application. If any adverse order is passed by the Revenue Board, then the petitioner is free to file fresh writ petition. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition is disposed of. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. A.K. Chouhan/-