IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (DB) No.1212 of 2011 Satya Narayan Sah son of late Lakshmi Sah R/o village Pokhariya P.S. Araria,Dist.Araria ………. Appellant Versus 1.The State of Bihar 2.BrijlalSah son of late Sawalal Sah 3.MurliSah son of late Chhotan Sah 4.Narayan Sah son of late Ratilal Sah 5.HarilalSah son of late ratilal Sah 6.Ashok Sah son of BrijlalSah 7.Dinesh Sah son of Brijlal Sah, all r/o village Pokhariya P.S. Araria, Dist. Araria ……….Respondents. -------------- 2 21.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the State. The appellant has challenged the judgment dated 5.11.2011 passed in Sessions Trial No. 46 of 2008/11 of 2008, whereby the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. NO. IV, Araria has acquitted the respondent nos. 2 to 7 from the charges under section 307 and some other sections of the Indian penal Cod who has found the accused persons not guilty for the offences under section 147, 323, 342 of the Indian Penal Code and they have been extended benefit of Probation of Offender Act. The appellant has also challenged the inadequacy of the conviction and sentence on the ground that despite evidence the court has erred in passing the order. We have perused the judgment and heard the submission. The trial court has given sound reasoning for arriving at the conclusion that the prosecution has not been able to prove its case under sections 307, 149, 148, 379 and 324 of the I.P.C. The judgment is neither perverse nor illegal. 2 The appeal has no merit and it is dismissed. M.Rahman (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J) (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)