1N TEE ATTER OF BHAGWAT PRASAD KBEY, 330 SHRI KKDUEEY R‘O HALIXEADI CHIRMIRI, mgr—mREACA3 2 PRINCIPAL, GOVT. MRI mmGE, mmvimgguwKcREA PETITION UNDER I BEFORE THE I-ION‘BLE HIGE B LASPUR COURT OF JU ‘ /£v” (w !20U3 WGYAN AVAM PRQDYOGIEG, DECS. BHAWAM GE. RGAQ RA} w”— , $.32-M DICATURE AT ;@¢L’ ‘ /W-~—M AGE‘D 5§ YR‘S‘ / " g v » ¥ ‘ ‘ ~ u . ARTICLE 227THE CQNSTITUTION NATURE OF OF ‘ INDIA MAE’DAMUS FOR DIRECTTON ISSUANCE AND A$ ANY OF DEEMED WRIT OTHER. 1N FIT ORDER THE OR M , ) ? é4 y FL) m Fmm W . ?w afar 311w Learned counsel hr the petitioner submits that the petitioner is being paid 25% subsistence allowance Whereas as ‘per rules he ought to have been paid 50% or so for about six / " months. Let subsistence allowance as admissible be paid. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the inquiry is going on and the reply/ has been filed. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and material on record, it is directed that the Inquiry ' Officer be appointed as early as possible Within fifteen days, who shall proceed with the inquiry and shall complete it as ‘ ‘ early as possible prefera y within four months. With the aforesaid observations, this petition stands disposed of with liberty t avail the remedy under the law, in case the cause of action 'ses. 12/2/2004 Shri Pradeep Saxena for the petitioner. Shri Ayaz Naved, Govt. Advocate, for the State. Heard. C.C.;as per rules. Sd\l-é Fakhruddin L