.3 BEFORE THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. ^o^-t Of2006. 1 PETITIONER DEFENDANT N0.3 Chetan Banneda, aged 34 years, son of Late Shri Kantilal Barmeda, resident of Choubey Coloney, Raipur, Tahsil and Disbrict Raipur (Chhattisgarh), V E R S U S RESPONDENTS / oV^ ^y/, ..-'',•<? ./ €-3' ,A^'/ w K. KASAR •NOTARY{AQyOCAT£) :- 1. Smt. Kranti Sharma, aged 66 years , wife ofLate Krishna Kumar Shanna, 2. Vijay Kumar, aged 44 years, • 3. Sujeet Kumar, aged 35 years, 4. Ku. Jyoti Kiran, aged 28 years, 5. Ku. Pushpanjali, aged 26 years, All resident of a House no. 11/64 Malviya Roa3,-Rai£ur(Chhattisgarh), 6. Smt. Uma Sturida, aged 42 years, wife of Sri Rajkumar, resi4ent of pawan Vihar Colony, Amalidih, RaipwiChhattisgarh), ^-7. Smt. Sayita Mishra, aged 38 years, 'vife of Shri Shailesh Mishra, resident of Mohan Nagar, Durg (Chhatdsgarh), Respondent no. 2 to 7, all sons and daughters ofLate Sri Krishna Kumgr Sharma, PLAmTIFFS 8. C.P. Gramophone House, Proprietor deceased Sri Kantilal Barmeda, House no. 11/54, Qpp. "TaraBhawan", Malviya Road, Raipur M.P. (now C&hattisgarR), 9. Sri Manish Barmeda, aged 28 years, son Contd..2.. h '/ < •-J of Sri Kantilal Barmeda, through 'R.H. Stores', House No. 11/54, Malviya Road, City, Tahsil and District Raipur M.P. (now Chhattisgarh). DEFENDANT N0.1 AND 2 PETN'ION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA DETAILS OF PETITION :- XI-HC-78 ~^^ an^T^f^iTO (raTsn^rgpiR; W^WI Sh*11<*> 3:^';^i<<ici-ayJ6iyilMi.iis;;Ri<-iiti^ . VV'.tS'.Ara. (.nl/^'^< ^ ^^wsr aciiBT'-iacu^'^eiIgsK^T)^ ?RnWHf?(T3TI^T 15.11.2006 Shri Pankaj ^rawal, Hcard on admission. By fhis wnt petitii Coustitutioa of India, fhe chaUenged fhe legalUy by which fhe application defendaat no.4 has been The brief facts are plaintiff^ expired emd his record by order dated 09 representatives of^the deiiied to sjgn fhe On fhis the remaiaing transpositu»uas defeiuiant the siufc It is this iappUca^ Court, against wfaich fhe petition. i lu fhe opinioa of represautatives ofjfhe Valmlatnatnii as a plauiti^ offhbt fifcd aUawed that dec^ased Vci.kala6rw.ma iaterfelrence transposed as a defeadan|t^ iUegality warrantmg iaterfe)n ofthe Constitution ofliidia.1 The petitiou has no| lunine. ^f^Fcl^l^ iTTOcff ^ tet^l' ^ ;; ¥a:ri^>r3n^T |counsel for the petitioner. tii|)n filed under Article 227 of fhe ^edtionerwho is defendant no.3 has portion of fhe order dated 31.1.2006 for transposition ofplaintiffno.2 as by fbe trialCoyrfc | ia the pending civfl suit, the sole igal representatives were brought on 13.2005. Tfaereafter one of the fegal ic., newly addedj plauatiff :no,2 for representatk)D, in flie CourL Fpaintiffs filed an applieation for his ^.0.4 &r the purposes of piosecution of |on which has becn aUowed by the trial defendant no.3 has filed this writ ]fhis court, wfafingODfi| of fhc tegal ta't-o At^" ^ dec^ased plaiatiffi has dciued to sign the in a case, has becn iaUowed to be , fhe trial Court has pommitted no by this Court under Article 227 nierits. The saine js dismiss^Jn XI-HC-78 311^1 W Q-Ufh'. (IWSD^Tsoiitt) ^ ^y '^ ^ 3x^rtt<-t<jciHf!»((|jau®,?Riyiiyy,: . /^.y^" ^z^/-^gaf- *tIttt^ 1^ih^ 1* "" •••"<»>"•"yK'w ^? 3it3i<i'.i-8ith)(tp^isi<iy) ®CTWHfefSTI^T i —Z- fhe ,No In view of interim writ, I.A.l I.A.Nos.8841/2006 andI.A.No. 10453/2006 disposed of. above, .10454^ & 1045 foii qii<if<a<fl-< WRff fffSCS tRi^K' •i"i' ;":''15ii3ri^fT3n^r ^^v^^ M.W.P.No.4466/2006 for grant ofad- 2006 for amcndmcnt in fhe petition, 2/2006 for taking afSdavit on record out oftura listmg ofthe case aU staad Sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge P.T.O.