aw wd 0’? HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR T ' ‘ " ‘ " ‘f ""‘_-"’—1"W ' WRIT PETITION (S} No. 132‘s ofzans } I Dnip Saudagar, sgim of Shri Babu RAo Saudagar, aged ayout‘ 47 years, ,pregvently working as Assiswnt, Woman and Child PETITINER O We}fare Departmexit, Preject OmceBo‘dla, ’ Distt Kabeerdham CG) ( VERSUS 5 : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Chief Secretary Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawati; Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 2. State of Madhya Pfadesh, thmugh the Chief Secretaxy, Government of Madhya Pradesh, The Secretary, Woman and Chil Development, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Bhopal. The Seeretaw, Deptt of Woman and Child Development, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP) 5. Union of hidia, through the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance and Pensiom Department of ' Personnel and Training, Government of India, Khan Market, Ne Delhi. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. AgnihotgLJ. Present: Shri R.K.Kesharwani, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri ASKaehhwaha, Deputy Advocate Genera} for the State/ respondent No. 1 and 3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 17 day of March, 208) LA No. 01. This is an application for amendment in the cause title. The application is ordered as prayed for. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner undertakes to make necessary corrections during the course ofthe day. ‘ {f , . d . w d Shri Ajay Barik, Advocate on behaif of Shri S.K.Beriwal, Staning Counsel for the Union oflndia. 0 . Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this‘ petition on merit except that the petitioner be permitted to make a representation to the Committee in light of the judgment and order dated 17‘“ April, 2097 passed by this Com in B.R.Godboie Vs. Municipat . Corporation Burg and othem {2007(2) CGLJ i417}, to which learned counsel appearihg for the responeent/State have no objection. . Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in the same terms Le, the Committee so constituted is directed to consider the representation made by the petitioner, if his representations is not considered earlier. In the event, if it is not considered earlier, the fresh representation may be considered, as early as possible within a period of four months from the date of receipt of representation. The representations may be considered keeping in mind the fact of residence and posting of the employee in one State and posting of the spouse in other State. This exercise on the part of the Government of India may be completed within a period of four months horn the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. 1" ‘4 s; - Sd/- Satish K. Agnihntri I 9'1 ‘ ‘ Judge , l r "I