IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 8464 of 2008. Decided on: 07.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Pawan Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Respondent No.4 ex-parte. None for respondent No.5. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No.5 to the post of Technical Assistant. Respondent-State has placed on record the copy of selection list whereby the petitioner has secured 31.5 marks and respondent No.5 has secured 36.80 marks. The suitability of both, i.e. petitioner and respondent No.5 has been adjudged by the duly constituted Selection Committee. Moreover, this Court will not sit in appeal over the recommendations made by the Selection Committee 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - since no malafide has been alleged against the constitution of Selection Committee. 2. Consequently, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 07, 2010. (sck).