\ l.t*<-?^®^S,i^^ ^^ XII.l^/(Jail) /^tp^R. 11/94/2,000 APPEAL OF PRISONER h^h;. -!!;!n3]) No. ^^Qg/SS.. . ......... Name X ^.. Father's name ....^^%J^.....................^^-.l3.<?..' Residence^P%^.^y^ir/<^^??^%^?5'^rf/.SI^ S^r^^edioW^^ ^^^^..^..O^r^)/}./.^...^^^^^^ ^g-;-^r^^-W^:';""-^ ,__„,_._^ZC/ .^ _^'". '.. ^ _-^_-=. Undersection..^.^.,.^^;.............by'3^^.^i^.^T^.€?^^ ^r^ It is explained to the prisoner that if-he states or wishes to be represented by llegal pracfitioDer the Appellate Foiirt will not proceed with the base for seven days u^nless the legal practitioner appears . If the legal practitioner does not appear within seven d^ys he may not heard at all'. Ifthe prisoner st^tes that he does not wish to be repre- iated by legal practitioner the court may proceed at once with the case and will n6t be :f^bliged to give a hearing to any legal practitioner vvho should appear . j 1 2 3 4 Date of Application for copy pf Judgement ; Date on which copyreceived Date on which Appeal seat ........ .^^/^/.^7. Whether the prisoner wishes to be represented or not - Yes / No No.... .............^^^^.<S............ Name.%^^^X.^^!%M^:....i ..ff^^. Confined in ...... ...........^%-^^.......... Jail No......^4/^s-^/d:7-- - Dated ...........^^/I997 ^orwarded to the-€Hffi^^U-OIC1At7-MAGI§IRAT£.^ l^r rfWyfl^- S^.^fm/'^PJ'^ ff:y 6w^^ Fogather which a copy ofjudgement or order passed inttie ca'se7 fo^ favouFof'f^Ws- ^ssion to the proper Appellate Court. ^XI^";- ^^ 'A*^^y ? .Q ^g^Q ^—e^.^T^^- ^Q Date of receipt ia... ........ ... ................ office Date of receipt record to accQmpany the Memo ofAppeal to ihe Appellate court No FoTwardcd to thc Dated Date of Teeeipt iii Appdlate Court flItke»Brtiiihtt8afri ..^•AS^ni. - 9 4UH Xe»» •»e66»iasi»-'8 W^ C<m^.Irihd|W P. T. O. ) ^^: h. XI-HC-22 ^ / -I- 2. ^^ ^i^id^, ^wre, t^pB^ sn^w;^^ ...Q?;jL.:.^°..lu - ^?Rid4N 'Rft^^ i^St ^^R ^^1^? 3^? SHRI :AL N0. 1148.0f 1997 Vs. of Shri S.C.Ver'rna, learned coyns Shri U.N.S.Deo, learned Ad(3 Akhi? IVlishra, iearned Panei Lav^er f4 L J L.C.B.hadoaJ The appejiant lias preferred th| Crimlnai Procedure Code .questionins jydgment of conviction. and order of, iearned First Additionai Sessions Judj the learned Session. Judge] guiity for commission of-murderof under Section 302 of'the indian yndergo imprisonmentfor life-an.d pa^ payment offine to fijilher undergo on^ Case ofth:e prosecytjon,.in:brlef, is his-wfe Shyama Bai were residing.in th e fatefu! day,,th e .matemaj uncle 'el forthe appellant, itJonal'.Pubiic Prosec.utor: wtH rthe respondent/State. JDGME'NT (16.0^2006) |s appeai uffder Section 374(2)1 •the jega.iity. and;.corTectness .^entence 30.04.97. passje :l|e, Rajnandgaon in S.T..NO. 1|; |after holding the accused/a? jiis wfe Shyama "Bal'convide^ Renal Code and' sentenced a.fine'of Rs. 5001- and In deft i^ yearngorous jmprisonment.- tftat accused Rambharosa aionl the thrashing fieid. oflh-eir" un^i ind his son wenf to-the falr.- [^ Shri lofthe lof'the le'd by -00/96 p^ellant hirn to- suit of 11im gv le. On In tiie ^^fe^ XI-HC-22 •or ^^"^rr^id^, ^aTCFi^, fN^ra^: ^I^W ^^K ,.^....-..;.G4.,.(,A».:.43 :WH^lt^NlGh fats^T* 3:H^T'^T i^IW'STI^i '^RN?^rfi^ h ^T^T'^^T^'^T? ~2- 1 w^nt carfie afternoon,- deceased Shyama Bai wa| milk to her son:at that tirne, the matern^il the thrashing flled.and Rupotin Bai that period t.he accused/appeliant camj tv^o-three times. P.W--2 Amro Bai tried accused/aippeiiant and he attacked hi^ afcer ieavJng knife stuckin the chest called his son from the viiiage who saw Shyama B.ai.in the injured conditij^n Slngh, He aiso came and saw Shyafi|. poiice station yanpur and iodged tiw. ije R.adhe Shyam, ';H@ad Constable regist A.S.!. K.R.Banjare left forthe scene of P-3 to the Panchas prepared, Pancl| Shya'ma Bal. He took Into possession. into possession p!ain- sol! and occurrence under P-7. The-shirt and possession un.der P-S. Aftercyfrting were taken into possession .under-P-uc|. jnvestigatin.g officer A.S.I. K.R.Benjar4 Patv^ri. The body ofShyama Bai .under PW13 to"Govt. Hospjtal, Va-np|jr coriducted postmortem-and prepared he opi,?iedthat the cause.ofdeath Is.n^ wound and rupture of heart and the opinlon ofthe doctor reQardlng the A and the doctor referred the ciothes ahd to inten/enie but could not stop|the .wlfe with'th.e'knife and ran a{Aay ofthe'deceased. Thereafter-Amro Bai on the scene of Qccurrence.iand an.d 'jnformed his father Ku^v^r' leport. P-1. The Investigatlng.Ofjlcer bioejds ttie '^R?<n<fl^<W^f ^J^S ^I'^R ^^^BTI^i sittlng in the house and.feeding aunt of accusedAmro Baiwa:s in •to the we!! to fetch water during wth .a knife and'attackedhis wlfe a Bai lylng dead and v^ent to ered' the: merg Intimation P-2 occurrerice and givlng n^iice anama. 8.-4 of the 'dead bo^ 6f n.e bianket under P-6,'he also icok stained soil from the. piac^ of the and ^ant ofthe ac.cusedv^ere taken :he naiis of the accused"the s^me Site plan P-10 was prepare^l by Site pi-an P-12 vi/as prepare^ by sen't'fcr.postmortem examin^.tion' where Dr. V.P.Khunte (P.|iV.9) ie postmortem report P-13in v^hich imorrhagic shock due to pe'rfortated dfeath ^ras homlcidal in nature. |ed articles sought under ^14" bloodstained artidesto FoNnslc ahd J_ [TN Into The ^fe^ XI-HC-22 •^ '3??^T^7 'fe^^T^ ^Hicb ^^0? ^ST ^i^RR, ^Tti^^l^, t^rey 31?^T 'q^? .......jQf...^..-.Gio......^ ^D WW^T^W^ qn. 'l^^ar" l31T^l '^IT^T ^f^T -5>^ Science -Laboratory, Rai'pur unde| deceased were taken jnto posses^i' under P-24. After compietion ofthl the Court ofJydicial Magistrate Firtt com'mitted th.e case to the Sessioils First 4^drtio^^!Sess'Jons.Judge re^eived P-14 and P-15. The clothes of the |ion under P-17. The report of P.S,L. is ^ 'investigation charge sheet was fiied in 'Class, Anibagarh Chovrfci v^io In •turn: Judge, Rajnandgaon from ^4iere the the case on transfer for triai. The' prosecutjon In order to esta| examined 12. wltnesses. On the otjier also recorded under Section 313 prosecution evidence'appearing a^ainst and has been- faiseiy rmpiicated.in Learned Addltionai Sessions 'Jufcl AdditiQnal PubJic Prosecutor an(d convlcted and seiitenced the accuj judgment.. ;We have heard .Mr. S.C.Verm^ accysed/appeiiant and'Mr U.N.S. theState. Hom'icidai death ofShyama Bai is As far as involvement ofthe accu^ is.concerned, P.W. 3 Rupotin Bai the fatefyi day,.at the'fatefu! tim^ whlch was at a distance of 15-2Q _and she saw'the accused ^N^Nh ^ip^f^fe^ xf^^R ^t3?f^P:?^1^ )iish the-charges agalnst the accused hand, state.ment ofthe accused v^s lof the Cr.P.C. in ^iich he denied the him and stated that he.is innocent ;he crlme. ' i ige' after hearing' the .arguments •of counsei for 'the accused/appeiiant •ed as'mentioned in paragraph l.ofthis o' tearned -counsei on behaif Peo vAh iVlr. Ai<hii Mlshra, on' bejiaif jiot-in dispute. ^.ed in committlng the murder ofh|s wfe ^o is the eyewtness has stated t|i.at cn :she v^ent to fetch v^ter from thle weii fi:. aviQy from the piace of occut^rence iEting hte wife with'the- knife an4 sft^r [^^f^ 'f the of ^^^^^,^^y^^^^^ •H;';'^^.^'':;;.;.c'^^;;"^.^]';^.^ -&' Xl-H'C-22 c^ 3??^I'^T ^t^^Elg^! s^+ii^ ^^ 8. .•,^ ^^ ^iWW^ ^Tii^4S, ft^li^^C 3H^T; "q^9? Tw<w-&"A--lm}<lk-?"^ "^^8T' ifi:^^IJIiI^ WH^TW^?^ 3?1^?l'i^T^R <??f^T -tt- stabbing he teft the knife in thestorti from the scene ofoccurrence- !n thel defence has not been able to eiicit'] evidence unreijable or un.trustv^orthyS stands corroborated bythe medicai e|v . ^ich he Sias stated that he conductN found as many as five injurie-s. Thei|c right side of th-e chest, teo wounds .right side of the eibow. There Viras ^ cm.., the right .!ung v^fas ruptured on' her heart was found puncture< cause of death v^s hernorrhagic sh^ and lungs. When P.W.-1 Kunwar S'ml about the.lncident he' immedlately jnjulred condition and reported the m^t 1. Amro Bai-P.W.-2 in Sier evidence- ^t il e attacking his • wfe h ovi/ev er in .11 jt but the fact remalns that from supported by .medicai evidence, the .in the crime in question-is establish^ any illegaiity or jnfjrrnity in the judgm^r lachofthe deceased and ran dvray cross-examination ofthis v^tness the any circumstance vvhich makes this Further the evidence ofthrs swithess Learned counsel- for the accused/ap established that the offence against beyond Section 304-1 ofthe IPC. ^pfeNN "RI^T ^ fe^f <fa^{< i?^<?H^?T idenceofDr.V.P.Khunte(P.W. 9)in. |d the postmort'em on 05.02.199^ and !e were four incised wounds - oitii the ion ieft slde of the chest and oiti the lerforated wound in the sjze of 2x1.5 ^ccount ofknife injury, the ieft siiie of on account of knife injury and the ?ck on account of injun/ on the |ieart 3h, went to the fair and came to j<now .|ca,me 'an'd. saw Shyama" Bal • ir^. the per in Manpur poiice statlon yncjer P- has stated that she sawthe acilused ^e cross examination she has denied evidence of P.W.-3 Rupotih Bai Involvement of the accused/appeliant id a.nd to that extent we do not find Intofthetria! Court. the 'ellant argyed that from the fact;s it is 1 he accused/appeliant does not travej ^^ ~^.H3^ XI-HC-22 ^' . •^' S^^T [<r<W ^HN»^Tf^ 10. .11 12 13 ^- ^^ ^TPTI^T^, '^ftWf^/^^TffS? ^..........:.e...^,£U,..i^ WW^TWRIG^ i^^* ^ff^T^^TW ^rf^ -S'- On the other hand iearned counsei judgment. •Lookjng to the'condu-ct af.the acci three incised wounds wth the knife resuit of which the he^rt and spontaneousiy. There is nothjng or any sudden fight or qyarrel ancl tl passjon. Moreover, themanner in'.v by, he-acte.d In.-a cruel manher. Th act ofthe accusedis not covered w iPO. - . , • "or the State supported the trial Court |sed, in.qujck succession, he causecl m/the chest'ofthe deceased.and as a jung were ruptured and she died record which sho^^ that there 'v©s ie -accysed assauited in the heat-of |?hich the-accysed attaoked repeatedly trefore we' are •of the opinion that the ider exceptlon 4 of Section 300 of.the 1n the resuit we 'do riot flnd any infi^ijty triai. Court.and the.appeal belng de\|oid it.is ac'cordingiy disniissed., Hov^ever, learned coynsel for the received jnformation.. -from the trial seriousiy iil. . ifjt is so, then-it isthe duty ofthe that- proper tr'eatment be given to State to convey jntlmation to this eff' ^Rajnancjgaon. Sd/" L.C. Bhadoo Judge a^l^T^N W^f T| fe^ 'tf^^FC ^^^H^???l ^.-or iiiegaiity in the judgment of'the of merits is iiabte to be dismissed. ccused/appeiiant submit that h4 ha's Court'counsej that the accys^d is' Superlntendent, Centrai Jail to erlsure. 'he accused..Learned counsel fd,r the ect to the Superintendent, Central Jail, Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge