IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRL.P.No.10149 of 2010 Between:- Jakkula Mallikarjun and another …Petitioners A n d The State of A.P., Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another …Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRL.P.No.10149 of 2010 ORDER: This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing further proceedings against the petitioners/A-1 & A-4 in Cr.No.127 of 2010 of Huzurnagar Police Station, Nalgonda District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. None appears for the respondent, though served with notice. Perused the record. 3. Based on a complaint given by the second respondent, the police registered a case in Cr.No.127 of 2010 against A-1 to A-4 and others for the offences under Sections 324 and 34 IPC. According to the prosecution, the complainant’s daughter Pramila mediated for fixing the marriage alliance for A-1 and that subsequent to the marriage, A-1 was ill-treating his wife Uma and that there was a dispute and discussion regarding the same on 29- 06-2010 and in the course of the said dispute, A-1 beat his father-in-law and the complainant’s daughter intervened and questioned A-1 and thereupon A-1 took up the firewood sticks from the oven and beat the complainant’s daughter on both hands and caused injuries and the victim was taken to hospital in 108 ambulance. The complaint discloses specific allegations to the effect that the petitioner beat the victim with sticks and caused injuries. The truth or otherwise of the said allegations cannot be decided in the present proceedings and can be ascertained only after due investigation. The investigation is in the threshold stage. 4. It is well settled principle of law that the inherent powers of the Court have to be exercised with care, caution and circumspection and they cannot be invoked to thwart further proceedings, especially where the complaint discloses specific allegations prima facie attracting the ingredients of the offences alleged. 5. In the present case, in view of the fact that specific allegations have been made against the petitioners, requiring detailed enquiry, it is considered not a fit case to quash further proceedings against the petitioners/A-1 & A-4 in Cr.No.127 of 2010 of Huzurnagar Police Station, Nalgonda District. 6. In the result, the criminal petition is dismissed. _____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 13th December, 2010 Lrkm.