l*y1. IN THE HIGH CGURT OF JUDIC&TURE ^ AT JAB&LPOR W.P. NO?'-''-'''^/!??? RESPONDENTS Vs. 1. Hohanaal Chandrakar aged about 29 years s/o Shri Roshan Kumar Chandrakar, resident Qf Amit Hedieal Sfcores» Sinfihi Pradesh* 2. Komal Singh Verma Aged 28 years s/o Pyarelal resident of Graia Post Tahsil Berla Bist. Surg ra Pradesh. Verma Habiba 3. Bhikamlal Sinha aged about 29 years s/o Shivram Slnha resident of Gran Post Kesra Patan Dist. Durg, Madhya Pradesh. 4. Ishwarilal Sahu aged about 28 years s/o Rekhram Sahu refeident of Gram Post Mahud, Tahsil Oundardevi Dist. Burg, Madhya Pradesh. 1. State of Madbya Pradesb though Secretary Departmeat of School Education V&llabh Bhawan,Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. j(^2. The Jila PaBchayat thcough tbe Chief Executive Officer, i3urg, Madhya Pradesh, s?. Tbe Collector, Burg. WRIT_EETITXGN UNDER ART. 226/227 05- THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA J__ P-^-^^-i —'« - —^—C—>-A XI-HC-22 an^t^ii h-U'b Sl^! ?ti*iich •(rfitt 'S^ '^WM<<, 9fll<-i<re, ftMiuy *(1*1CTI 'Kffffi L.^:..^3^/?7 ISre^ar- ai^i'renssiT'ofcr 10/4/2002 Shri P. Diwakar for the f Shri Qautaxn Bhad4ri, rcspondents no. 1 and 3. Nonc for respondent no.: Heard. Let rejoiader be taken ODJ With the consent of ftie! heard. Learaed coiiasel for the petitioners were selected for subject Chemistty alongwith) subjects. In respect of other were issued but soiae coinplajj PoUce Establishinent (Lokayij record. Meanwlule, fhe before the H^h Court of No.62/99 and the High Cour( order dated 18/1/ 1999 directcd c?)t<iS(vl^1 ^WV^ ^ fe^A <^ll't^f< i? SI^OT an^r etitioners. Govt. Advocate. for record. parties, fhe inatter is finafly betitioners subtDitted that tbe ^hiksha Kanni Grade-I in the other persons of different persons, appoiatments orders plaj^it was inade through Special cayi^kt), which has seized the petjtioHers had filed a petition M^dhya Pradesh bearing W.P. of Madhya PradesU vide its thc petitioners to filc an [Tft^^Rs^ XI-HC-22 'S^ '^ww<<, va'ww, fadl'y^ SS^WI 'feii^stit^t . sft+ii^ ^f^t iN^^^^^i^i^^' [SS'-t.U^&S:^iS'iSfi»:~> *tr>-R-ff sbHlcK ^.f.H^,^3^ sn^r TOiiwsfeT z. appeal befbre the Coiumission< filed aa appealbefore the Coini(ii! in favour of thc pctitioncrs vid( tfaey wcre not appoiated on tht not receivcd fi'oui fhe ofBce of Shri Diwakar referred te| (Annexure-P/1), wlu.ch goes to order passed by fhe Special received on 5/1/2002. It is also poiated out fha^ initiated in the H^h Court of] No.229/99 (Shiv Narayan and ofhers), fhe H^h Court of| 13/12/2001 that'after recei^ record fi-om the Lokayukt coinply the ordcrs of the coinpUaace on 15/1/2002. Or^ had reported the coinpliancc of Jbd .^ <tit<il<-t<<li iiiaf 4 isc6 tRt+^i< ^T ariigii sii^g |r. Thereafter, the petitioncrs [lissioner, which was decided order dated 5/4/1999. But pretext that the record was lokayukt. fhe letter dated 7/1/2002 show that pursuant to soine Ige, Durg, record has beea in the conteinpt piocecdiags M.P. vide conteinpt petition Dev^ngan vs. Diaesh Shrivastava |M.P. has passed aa order ou ^ing the photo copy of the cjffice the respondents shall pigh Court and report the 15/1/2002, the rcspondente fhe order. But ia fhe casc of [^t^ ^fo^ XI-HC-22 'S^ •<<MI<1<1, SS'nlwiS, iqwitiy (d .Q *<|tfr(r stiHrai ..^.£:.±^.£^3'1/^ an^i ?n ft;-fi5h SIllSI ^^icn «iin l^^^g't':'"- sn^i^aiwdto 3 the petitioners, no appointment o41ers have been issued tiU date. Lcamed counsel for fhe pct^tioncrs has produccd the ^hat bc filcd properly. ioners farthcr subnutted copies of fhe aforesaid orders. Let Leanied counscl -for fhc pct^tt that soine contract appointments posts are fiUed, tbe petitioners benefit. ^u-e beiug inade and if the 4light be deprived of the Having considered the fact' niaterial available on record, it is the petitioners shaB be examined passed iucluding the one in. coffl "{fll^ and they Aritbe given appointme^it, Let that be doue as earlv as three weeks. In view of fhe above dit^ctions, this petition is disposed of at fhls stage with lib^rty to file afi-esh, in case aay adverse order is passcd. ^iT^i^^ iTFT^f^^^ <^i+^t< ^stPgHSii^i aad circunistances aad Birected that the cases of |in the Ught of the orders |empt petition No.229/99 if found fit. jpossibte preferably wittun i:- \ j i XI-HC-22 SII^B^I Ki-ii* sne^i ^RT^'^tI^d s^^o^-^ T^ •<ii'i<i<n<<, anl'y'is, fadi'Hy NIHCfr ShHR) W'^-HM'-^^/^f STI^I TCiIWHftd ^ Certified photo copy as ofthe order be supplied to the •si>t<4tci41i *tii<if 4 feA <RI|'($]< ^?3lfSOT3II^W per rules aad the photo copy Btate CouuSel. J'L.- Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge