IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CONTEMPT CASE No.1039 of 2010 (Contempt Case U/s. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondents herein for violating, disobeying the Order of the High Court dated 05.05.2010 in WP.No.11011 of 2010.) BETWEEN: Shirdi Sai Blue Star English Medium High School, East Godavari District. ... PETITIONER AND Sri D. Sambasiva Rao, Secretary, Education Department and four others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. V.S.R. ANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER: Alleging disobedience of directions of this Court dated 05.05.2010 in WP.No.11011 of 2010 this contempt case is filed. 2. Petitioner states that after the contempt case was filed and notice was ordered by this Court on 23.07.2010, the official respondents have now passed an order dated 05.08.2010 wherein they have pointed out as many as 12 deficiencies requiring the petitioner to comply with them. According to the petitioner, the said deficiencies are non-existent and he had already submitted all the required material and thereby it is alleged that the order of this Court is violated. 3. The respondents have filed a counter affidavit together with documents to substantiate that as per directions of this Court, the petitioner’s application was considered and proceedings dated 05.08.2010 were passed stating that as and when the Management of the School provides all particulars of infrastructure and relevant documents, as required for fulfilling the norms settled by the Government, the petitioner’s application shall be reconsidered for taking necessary action. 4. The petitioner has also filed a reply affidavit enclosing the representation dated 06.08.2010 made by it showing compliance of the requirements and the same is pending consideration of the respondents. 5. In view of the above, I am not satisfied that there is willful disobedience on the part of the respondents. However, as stated by the respondents themselves in their proceedings dated 05.08.2010 that they would reconsider the petitioner’s application, the respondents shall now reconsider the petitioner’s application in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders preferably within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to above, the contempt case is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J September 3, 2010 DSK