THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.NO. 3126 of 2006 ORAL ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the orders of the learned III Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in I.A.No. 1651 of 2005 in O.S.No. 5537 of 203, dated 27.2.2006. Brief facts of the revision are that: Petitioner herein is the petitioner-defendant and the respondent No.1 herein is the respondent No.1-plaintiff before the trial Court, wherein the petitioner-defendant has filed the present petition against the respondent No.1-plaintiff and also respondent No.2-Proposed Party(Plaintiff) seeking to implead the respondent No.2 therein as proposed party plaintiff No.2 to the suit. For the purpose of convenience, the parties as arrayed before the learned trial Court are referred to hereinafter in this order. After hearing the parties, the learned trial Court, has dismissed the said petition. Challenging the said order of the learned trial Court, the present revision petition has been preferred by the defeated petitioner. Heard both sides. As can be seen from the order under revision that initially the respondent No.1-plaintiff has filed a suit against the petitioner- defendant before the lower Court for eviction and recovery of possession, arrears of rent, past and future mesne profits. In the said suit, the petitioner-defendant has filed the present petition to implead the 2nd respondent as proposed plaintiff. It is crystal clear from the order under revision that the petitioner did not file any document to show that the possession was delivered to the 2nd respondent and also no document is filed before the court to prove the transaction between the respondent No.2 and the respondent No.1-plaintiff, except the letter dated 16.6.2003. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and also in view of the finding of the lower Court, I do not find any merits in the civil revision petition and the same is not maintainable and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, the lower Court shall dispose of the suit within a period of six months from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order if not already disposed of without being influenced by any of the observations made in this order. _______________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J 10.2.2009 CHV