CRM No.M-32565 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:-25.11.2010 Sunil @ Sully son of Hukam Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr.Deepender Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Vikas Malik, A.A.G., Haryana. M ehinder S ingh S ullar , J . (Oral) Invoking the provisions of section 439 Cr.PC, petitioner Sunil alias Sully son of Hukam Singh, has applied for grant of regular bail in a case registered against him alongwith his other eight co-accused, vide FIR No.22 dated 23.2..2008 for the commission of the offences punishable under sections 148, 323, 356, 427 and 506 read with section 149 IPC read with section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, by the police of Police Station Sadar Ballabgarh, Distt.Faridabad. 2. Notice of the petition was issued to the State. 3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with their valuable help and after considering the entire matter deeply, to my mind, the present petition deserves to be accepted in this respect. 4. What is not disputed here is that the petitioner was earlier allowed regular bail and was attending the Court regularly. It was only on 22.7.2009 as he did not appear in the trial Court, therefore, he was ordered to be summoned through non-bailable warrant. It is not a matter of dispute that the petitioner himself surrendered in the Court of Special Judge on 10.9.2010 and since then he is in judicial custody. No useful purpose would be served to further detain him in CRM No.M-32565 of 2010 2 jail. 5. So, taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances, emanating from the record, as discussed here-in-above and without commenting further anything on merits, lest it may prejudice the case of either side during the course of the trial, to me, the present petitioner is entitled to regular bail in the obtaining circumstances of the instant case. 6. In the light of the aforesaid reasons, the petition for regular bail is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. 25.11.2010 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) AS Judge