IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.888 of 2007 RAMASHRAY MAHTO aged about 53 years son of Late Keshav Mahto Chhunakhari (Machharhatta) P.O. Badh, P.S.- Badh, District- Patna Versus 1. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional Office, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, “R” Block, Road No. 6, Patna 2. The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, National Textile Corporation Ltd, a Govt. of India undertaking, 7 Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Kolkatta & 700013 3. The Divisional Manager, Retail Marketing Division, National Textile Corporation Limited, S.P.Verma Road, Patna ----------- 2 08.04.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievances the petitioner proposes to file a detailed representation before the respondent no.1. In this view of the matter, it is directed that in case such representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order, the respondent no.1 shall consider and dispose of the same by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of six weeks on receipt of such representation taking into consideration the grievances raised in the representation. In case the representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, the respondent no.1 shall simultaneously issue necessary orders for redressal of the grievances of the petitioner. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)