IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36276 of 2008 SAJAN KUMAR @ JIDI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 26.11.2008 Heard Sri Madhukar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner forcibly took away the daughter of the informant and took her away for the purposes of marrying her. The girl appears recovered and making statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. in which also she has stated that the petitioner forcibly took her away. The contention is that there is a lot of material in the case diary along with some love letters written by the girl to the petitioner. The further contention is that the medical examination reports Annexures-3 and 4 indicate as if the lady could be a major one. I have perused the record and specially the two Annexures which are the medical reports. The lady has been reported to have been completed 17 years. There by the lady could not be said to be 18 years of age, considering which, the petition is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )