IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1058 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1058 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1058 OF 2006 IN IN IN O.S.APPEAL (L) NO.204 OF 2005 O.S.APPEAL (L) NO.204 OF 2005 O.S.APPEAL (L) NO.204 OF 2005 FROM FROM FROM REVIEW PETITION NO.39 OF 2005 REVIEW PETITION NO.39 OF 2005 REVIEW PETITION NO.39 OF 2005 IN IN IN NOTICE OF MOITION NO.3203 OF 2004 NOTICE OF MOITION NO.3203 OF 2004 NOTICE OF MOITION NO.3203 OF 2004 IN IN IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.21 OF 2002 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.21 OF 2002 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.21 OF 2002 IN IN IN SUIT NO.1421 OF 1997 SUIT NO.1421 OF 1997 SUIT NO.1421 OF 1997 Kokila Hemant Shah .. Applicant V/s Mr.Chittaranjan D.Shah & Ors. .. Respondents ----- Mr.S.Purohit i/b. M/s.Haresh Mehta & Co. for the Applicant. Mr.Denzi Dimello for the Respondents. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2006. DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2006. DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant and the learned Counsel for the Respondents. By this Notice of Motion, the Applicant is seeking condonation of 11 days delay. Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)