1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Criminal Writ Petition No.206 of 2008. PETITIONER : Abdul Yunus S/o Gulam Mohiddin (Convict), Central Prison, Amravati, (In Jail). -VERSUS- RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32. 2. State of Maharashtra, through D. I. G. (Prisons), Nagpur. 3. Superintendent, Central Prison, Amravati. Shri S. A. Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri S. B. Ahirkar, APP for the respondent. CORAM: A. H. JOSHI AND A. B. CHAUDHARY JJ. DATED: 22nd JANUARY 2009. ORAL JUDGMENT :( Per A. H. Joshi, J) 1. Rule. Rule is returnable forthwith and heard by consent. 2. We find that the petitioner was convicted for murdering his wife and doubting her chastity. Petitioner's wife was already a mother of three children, and had already abandoned the company of the petitioner, yet later had came back on his request. 2 3. In these premises, the categorization of the petitioner done by the State Government cannot be faulted. 4. Other grounds agitated in the petition relate to the punishment of forfeiture of remission. 5. Nothing is brought on record to suggest that the said forfeiture is illegal. 6. Petition does not call for interference and is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE //MULEY//