THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.4397 of 2010 Date:09th March, 2011 Between: B.Raghavendra Chary @ Raghavender ..... Petitioner AND Smt.B.MadhaVI @ Jyothi .....Respondent *** THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.4397 of 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 27.08.2010 passed in I.A.No.570 of 2010 in HMOP No.18 of 2010 on the file of the Family Court-cum-Additional District Court, Mahabubnagar, whereby and whereunder the learned Judge of the Family Court directed the petitioner herein to pay Rs.3,000/- p.m. to the respondent/wife as maintenance pending disposal of the HMOP No.18 of 2010. 2. The petitioner and the respondent are husband and wife. The petitioner/husband filed HMOP No.18 of 2010 seeking divorce on the ground that the respondent/wife is suffering from diabetis and also on the ground of cruelty. The respondent/wife filed I.A.No.570 of 2010 under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking interim maintenance pending disposal of the HMOP No.18 of 2010. The petitioner/husband resisted the said application on the ground that the respondent/wife is earning Rs.6,000/- p.m. and therefore, she is capable of maintaining herself. Learned Judge of the Family Court, on considering the material brought on record and on hearing the counsel appearing for the parties, proceeded to grant interim maintenance to the respondent/wife at the rate of Rs.3,000/- p.m. pending disposal of the HMOP No.18 of 2010, by order, dated 27.08.2010. Hence, this revision by the petitioner/husband. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/husband and perused the order impugned in the revision. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/husband submits that the respondent/wife is working as a Computer Instructor drawing a monthly salary of Rs.6,000/- and therefore, she is self-sufficient. 5. I have gone through the order impugned in the revision. The petitioner/husband having taken a plea that the respondent/wife is employed as a Computer Instructor drawing a salary of Rs.6,000/- p.m., failed to place on record any material to substantiate the same. Learned Judge of the Family Court considered the material brought on record in right perspective and directed the petitioner/husband to pay Rs.3,000/- p.m. to the respondent/wife pending disposal of the HMOP No.18 of 2010. The order passed by the learned Judge of the Family Court does not suffer from any illegality or irregularity warranting interference of this Court in exercise of powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, the learned Judge of the Family Court is directed to dispose of the HMOP No.18 of 2010 within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:09th March, 2011. cs THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.4397 of 2010 Date:09th March, 2011