c^ ^ Sli* .C OCi BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR o W.P.fSWo.^ /2011 PETmONER Sagun Singh Thakur, S/o Late. Madho Singh Thakur, aged about 51 years, Office Assistant Grade-III, 0/0 Regional Account OfGcer C.S.Power Transmission,Co. Ltd.,Gudhiyari, Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS v^> "^••^ IB$ ^..-^? ^'.<^> ...•-V>1€/" 4-Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Co.Ltd.Raipur. Through- Managing Director CSPHCL, Danganiya, Raipur (C.G.) 2- Superintending Engineer,(Jagdalpur Circle) Chhattisgarh State Power, Distri bution Co.Ltd.,(CSPDCL), Jagdalpur(C.G.).N.W. Henery. 3- Executive Engineer(0 & M)Division Chhattisgarh State Power,Distribution Co Ltd., (CSPDCL),Bijapur Distt. Bastar (C.G.). 4- Executive Engineer(0 & M)Division Chhattisgarh State Power,Distribution Co Ltd., (CSPDCL),Dantewada Distt. South Bastar(C.G.). 5- Superintending Engineer, (Jagdalpur Circle),Chhattisgarh StatePower; Distribution Co.Ltd., (CSPDCL), Jagdalpur, Distt.-Bastar (C.G.) S.D.Telang. ^ WRIT PETITON UNDERARTICAL 226/227 OF CON- STITUTION OF ENDIA. !VS ^-^^, ^ LfS.f^S-J s^, jri&r a (S'f^t iSPONDENT! Sagun Slngh Thakur. 8 Chhattlsgarh Power Ho! Ltd. Raipur and others. 228 OF Shri C.R. Sahu, counsei for petitioner. Followi" (31/01/2011) order of the Court was passed by (2) The relief claimed in this writ petition is for a directfon to the respondents to pay s-alary of ieave from 04/04/2007 to 11/03»'20)8 and ji'ant annual grade increment for the period from 2007 to 2010 amountin^ to Rs, 2,00,000/- with interest as also to pay arrears ofwage revision Trom the period 01/04/2009 till date approximately 2.5 lacs with interest to the petitioner. He has also prays for taking action against the respondents as aiso for award'ng compensation. (3) At the outset, learned counse! for the petitioner would submit that he has filed several repfesentations and the s-ame is pending consideration before the concerned Compefent AuthQrity of respondents No. 1 to 5. He would submit that if a directlon is issued to the respondent to decide his pending representation, the petitioner would pursue the representation before the Authorities. (4) In view of the limited prayer made by tearned counsel for the petitioner at this stage, it is directed that the petitioner may pursue his pending t-epresentation and may also file fresh representation wfthin.a period of 15 days from today and thereafter the concerned CompetenS Authority decide the representation in an objective manner and by reasoned order wit'nin a oeriod of six weeks thsreafter without being .prejudice by the relieT cl-aimed by the petitioner seeking initiation of criminal proceedings againstthe Competsnt AuShority. .»'"r~a^ r .<• i-!' i, a>.r?:5;KS&\ S 'iigssB"5'^ y tte^^" s )C- Ifthe grievance raised bythe petitioner is not remedied, he shal at iiberty to fite the vi/rit petition afresh. fQ\ Iftr';*^ 4.L»; With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge c.