IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10222 of 2005 RAMESHWAR NARAIN PRASAD, Son of Late Hari Bhajan Prasad, resident of Bailey Road, Rukunpura, Opposite Old Central Bank of India, Post Office, Bihar Veterinary College, P.S. Danapur, District-Patna ----------- Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Secretary, Human Resources Department ( Secondary Education), Govt. of Bihar,Patna 3. The Director of Secondary Education, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar,Patna 4. The Regional Dy. Director of Secondary Education, Budh Marg,Patna 5. The District Education Officer, Biharsharif,Nalanda 6. Head Master, Sri Shankar Uchya Vidayalaya Amarpur, Post Kolawana, Harnaut, District-Nalanda 7. Treasury Officer, Patna 8. Accountant General,Bihar,Patna ---------------------- Respondents. ----------- 03 21-01-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State as well as the Accountant General. The petitioner had approached this Court for directing the Respondents for payment of all the retiral dues of the petitioner. During the pendency of the present writ petition, the retiral dues of the petitioner have already been paid. Leaned counsel for the petitioner admits the same. However, it has been submitted by Sri L.P.K. Rajgarhia, learned counsel for the petitioner, that qualifying service of the petitioner has not been correctly taken into account. It was submitted that the petitioner had joined as teacher in the year 1971. However, for the purpose of his pension, the said period has not been considered by the Respondent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while referring to Memo No.1556 dated 17th August,2006 issued from the 2 Office of Director, Secondary Education, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar,Patna submits that in the case of similarly situated other teachers, similar relief was granted. However, the petitioner has been discriminated. Since all the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed, there is no need to keep the writ application pending. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Respondent no.3 within a period of six weeks from today for the grievance of counting his service from the year 1971. If such representation is filed, Respondent no.3 is directed to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. It is expected that while considering the representation, Respondent no.3 will keep in mind the cases of similarly situated persons. The petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)