IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN THURSDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2007 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 1493 of 2007(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.32430/2006 Dated 02/02/2007 .................... PETITIONER/2ND PETITIONER IN WPC ------------------------------- D.ANANDAM, AGED 66, D/O.DEVAKI, SMITHALAYAM, (ENCHANIYIL VEEDU) THAZHUTHALA, KANNANALLOR P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADV. SMT.S.K.DEVI SRI.SANTHOSH P.ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------ 1. A.SHAJAHAN, AGED, FATHER'S NAME AND RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM - 682 024. 2. B.UNNIKRISHNAN, AGE, FATHER'S NAME AND RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR (LA) KIP NO.XXI, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM NOW AT KOTTIYAM - 682 006. BY GOVT.PLADER SRI V.T.K. MOHANAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN, J. ------------------------------- CONTEMPT CASE (C).No. OF 2004 ------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2007 JUDGMENT The complaint made in this contempt petition is about the non- compliance of the judgment (Annexure-I) in W.P.(C).No.32340/06 wherein this Court directed the District Collector, Kollam to consider and dispose of the application filed under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act in accordance with law. The learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the State pursuant to the instructions submits that in compliance of the order of this Court in Annexure-I judgment, the application for redetermination of the compensation under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act filed by Anandam was processed and necessary award proposal submitted to the District Collector for prior approval. Final orders are not passed in Section 28 A application. In view of the above, the contempt application is closed for the time being and in case final orders are not passed in the application within three weeks, it will be open to the petitioner to seek revival of the contempt application. Information to this effect may be conveyed to the District Collector for prompt compliance of the order. P.R.RAMAN, Judge. kcv.