IN THE HIGH COURTOF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. RSA No.1336 of 2010 Date of decision: 28.5.2010 Chanan .....Appellant vs. Krishna Devi ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG. --- Present: Mr.K.S.Dadwal,Advocate, for the appellant. Mr.Sandeep Bansal, Advocate, for the respondents. Rakesh Kumar Garg,J.(Oral) This is defendant's second appeal against the judgment and decrees of the Courts below whereby suit filed by the plaintiff- respondent for specific performance of the agreement in question was decreed. Arguments were heard at length on 7.5.2010 and this Court was not inclined to interfere in the finding of fact recorded by the Courts below. However, keeping in view the prayer of the counsel for the appellant, notice of motion was issued to the respondent only for a limited purpose of exploring the possibility of amicable settlement between the parties. In response to the notice of motion issued by this Court, respondent has put in appearance before this Court through Shri Sandeep Bansal, Advocate. He has categorically stated before this Court that there is no possibility of amicable settlement between the parties. In the aforesaid view of the matter, I find no merit in this appeal and the same is dismissed. ( Rakesh Kumar Garg) Judge May 28, 2010 rk