PETITIONER RESPONDENTS km” MMW A J ‘vu ,f‘ §agLm Wm ‘2” Q3 BILASPUR VERSUS /l. Shiv Kumar Yadav S/o Late Shri Chhedilal Yadav, aged about 42 years, R/o Rajapara, NigamA Quarters, Raigarh, Tahsil & District Raigarh (C.G.). State of Chhattisgarh through — The Secretary, Department of Urban D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). Municipal Corporation, Raigarh, Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.). Administration and Development. OF INDIA ,x WRIT PETITION ( S) NO. 318$ OF 2009 BEFOREN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT WRIT PETITIONw UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION .I $ The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.). é\ w Vm"vuwxnesLgg...3.1.3.?“ 2007 9K°p7\g., mm (Wu) WWW mmm $qaq';aimmw 3 : How’gm sHm J 07.07.2009 51m Santosh Kumar Ti Shri Yashwant Singh ’i‘h TICE PmTiNKER DIWAKER counse1 for the petitioxmr. , Dy. A.G. for thC Stam. Chalknga in the pctition is to the order date<i 23.6.2009 (Annexure P] 1) passed by the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raigarh. Learned counsei for the petitioner fairly submits that an aiternative remedy is available j‘or the petitioner to approach the appeliate authority by filing aepeal. {n View of this fact, he seeks permission of this Court for Withdrawal of the petition He further submits that the dixection may be. issued to the appellate authority for deciding his appeal expeditiously. Accordiogly, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition with the aforesaid liberty: In the eventuality of filing appeal by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order, the. appellate authority shail decide the same Within the limitation period as prescribed under the law. Eu > i . t Sd/— ' y :‘Pritinker Diwaker f" ‘r * Judge @ s u w a ', r