1 W.P.No.10225/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.10225 OF 2010. Vithal Bhima Vadar ... Petitioner. Versus Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Delhi and another ... Respondents. ... Mr.U.S. Patil, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Alok Sharma, Asstt. Solicitor General for Respondents. ... CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 27.01.2011. PER COURT 1. Heard. 2 W.P.No.10225/10 2. The petitioner has participated in the selection process for the post of constable in Central Industrial Security Force. According to learned counsel, before selection of the petitioner, it was noticed that he did not disclose in his application that he was charged for offences punishable U/ss 325, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C. The counsel submits that the petitioner was acquitted by the Court on 26.3.2010. Due to inadvertence, the petitioner failed to disclose the same for which he shall not be adversely affected. The counsel prays for suitable direction to accept the form. 3. Mr.Alok Sharma, learned Asstt. Solicitor General, submits that thousands of candidates appear in the tests and the forms are scrutinised according to the norms maintained. The case arises out of suppression of material facts. The petitioner was applying in a responsible force entrusted maintenance of law and order. 4. Considering the facts of the case, we 3 W.P.No.10225/10 are not inclined to exercise our extra ordinary writ jurisdiction. The Writ Petition is dismissed. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (NARESH H.PATIL,J.) asp/office/wp10225.10