WPSS No.96 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. M.C. Kandpal, Senior Advocate duly assisted by Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- “i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent authorities to pay the pension to the petitioner assuming he has retired on 30-6-2009 in place of 30-1-2003. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent authorities to give other benefits to the petitioner. iii) Issue any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case be passed in favour of the petitioner. iv) Cost of the petition be awarded in favour of the petitioner.” Admittedly, the petitioner retired on 30/11/2003 and, since then, has been getting his pension. The petitioner, today, after a lapse of six years contends that he was wrongfully retired in the year 2003 and he should have been retired on 30th June, 2009 and, consequently, has prayed that he should be given pension on the basis that he has retired on 30th June, 2009. In my opinion, the relief claimed by the petitioner is patently misconceived and highly belated. If the petitioner was aggrieved by his wrongful retirement in the year, 2003, he should have challenged the same at that time. But today after receiving pension for six years, he cannot turn around and say that he was wrongfully retired in the year 2003. The writ petition is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 22.02.2010 Shiv