•i K: ,1'X A G_ 5"loo^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIONiS) N0. ^ S32_/2QQ6 PETITIONER .^^^•: ^^^s- N&- ^^ <(.''^- -c^ RESPONDENTS ^ ^ ^" ^b ,.v ^ ^^^^^ ^d^ ^y' ^'^6-'' ^ ^ Raninarayan Khunte, Son of Shri Tibhlu Ram Khunte, Aged about 47 years, Assistant ••'' .. Teacher, Goveminent Girls Higher Secondaiy School, Chainpa, Block QcJis^ District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). VERSUS '1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretaiy, Departaient of Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). 2. The District Education Officer, District Janjgir-Chamipa (C.G.). 3. The Block Education Officer, Block - fiokfcdq. Distt. Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). 4. The Conimissioner, Publication and Instinction, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION_UNDER _ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE XI-HC-78 sn^r^iTR-iicb •?2IT31I^rsbt|i+ 'S^ •<<l'qi<-l<l, BTdy'Ko, RldK-iy u). p.c-s.^ ^o. 6832-/C><o *11*1MI Stl*11<*> Wi; 200 3TI^?TtraqT (yii^S,^) ?;RIIWlrf?cT3II^T 11.12.2006 Shri Ashwani Shukla, learrfed Shri ^ay Dwivedi, ieamedl Heard. trie Surehdra By this petition under india, the petitioner seeks a dire|c increments and seniority on appointment in the light of the Administrative Tribunal, 1452/1998 (Harish Chandra others) dated 31.1.2000 2. Leamed counsel appearinb copy of the order dated 9-11-y PeUtion (S) No. 6123ff0)6 ( i Chhattisgarh and others) and 1890/2)03 (Chhattisgarh petitioner is simiiarly situated, passea. 3. The case of the petitioner i|s Teacher in the School Education of two years with the flxed salary] of two years' probatton, the given the regular pay scale from| Other similarly situated teacherjs Tribunal, Jabalpur for regular pay-| Arijcies 226/227 of the Constltution of jction to the respondents to pay the basis of the date of his iniUal de|cision rendered by the ieamed State Jabal|3ur in Original Application No. Sinsth and others Vs. State of M.P. and °bi''iI<'i'Ifl-f i<itic^t'fftei^t<Riit<i< ^srf^rsn^r ed counsel for the petitioners. P.L. for the State/respondents. for the petitioher placed on record (006 passed by is Court in Writ Kumar and another Vs. Stete of ^rder dated 6-4-2005 in W.P. No. Shikcl|iak Sangh) and submits that the <}ierefore, the similar order may be i|s that he was appointed as Assistant pepartment on probation for a period However, iater on, after completion petiti<tner was reguiarized but, he was not the date of his initial appointment. moved the State Administratlve tscale, wherein learned TrfburraLxide P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3D^T^TR^i+ .TOT 3n^?r aiTW ?^kf- ^ *TWCTTai*TT^ 3^ "l<l'41d'i|, »TTI«'II»,RlWKiy vu.P. CS>"M0' ^^-/^ •^[200 w^\ w* ('i^yKtft) ?^TiraT(rf?tT3n^r sante Have repre^entation order dated 31.1.2000 altowed tht representations to accord the situated, but, the respondents petition. 4. Learned counsel for the may be atlowed to make a similar treatment to the petitioner sanctioned to other similarty situat of the State Administrative Tribunlal counsel forthe respondents/State|has 5. Having heard iearned cour|sel to the facts and circumstances of ] the limited prayer made by team^d to be reasonable. Therefore, th|e representation wlthin a period of No.1, raising ail his grievances decide the said representation in | of 30 days from the date of r^ceipt considering all the points raisecf account the order dated 31.1.2P00 AdministraUve Tribunal in 6. The writ petition is accordj direction. No order as to costs. 7. Certified copy as per rules. | *l-i|Fcf41-111Hdl'fffeiA<Rl'tdl< ^isri^Trgn^r same. The petitioner made several treatment as he was also similarty not paid any heed. Thus, this rtetitioner submte that the petitioner to respondent No.1 to give |and same pay-scate which has been ted teachers on account of the order dated 31.1.2000, to which teamed no objection. r|sel for the parties and having regard the case, in the opinion ofthls Court, counsel for the petitioner appears petitioner is allowed to make a (wo weeks from today to respondent ^nd, in tum, respondent No.1 shalt |an objecBve manner within a period of such representation, after by the petitioner and taking into passed by the leamed State iNo. 1452/1998. jngly disposed of with the aforesaid Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge 2t)00 Original|Application P.T.O.