IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7659 of 2011 Date of Decision : September 13 , 2011 Ghanshyam Verma Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R. K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner claims benefit of adhoc and tenure service rendered by him. It is seen that some period is as J.B.T teacher and some period is as Language Teacher. As far as J.B.T. is concerned, that period will count only for the purpose of pension as per Rule 13 of the Pension Rules. As far as the adhoc/tenure period in the post of Language Teacher is concerned, in case the same is followed by regular appointment, that period shall be counted for the purpose of increments and pension, in view of judgment in LPA No. 36/2010. The needful shall be done within a period of four 2 months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 2. The writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. September 13, 2011 (PK/hl.)