IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID THURSDAY, THE 10TH DECEMBER 2009 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 AS.No. 736 of 2000(E) --------------------- OS.269/1994 of I ADDL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF ----------------------------------- PEETHAMBARAN, S/O.KALIAMPI, T.C. NO.46/609, JYOTHI NAGAR, POONTHURA, MUTTATHARA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.VENUGOPAL SRI.P.C.HARIDAS RESPONDENT/DEFNDANT ---------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER, CITY CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, CORPORATION BUILDING THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ADV. SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R.1 SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR FOR R.1 SMT.SUSHYA RAJAN FOR R.1 THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ---------------------------------------- A.S No.736 of 2000 & I.A. No.910 of 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of December, 2009 JUDGMENT I.A. No. 910/2008 is filed for enlargement of time for payment of the balance court fee of Rs.970/-. The appeal is of the year 2000. The appeal was filed on 11.8.2000. Notice in the appeal was ordered on 2.1.2001. There is a delay of more than 7 years in remitting the balance court fee. Sufficient cause was not shown in not remitting the balance court fee within the time limit permissible . When the matter was taken up for consideration on 9.12.2009, the appellant was not present. Therefore the matter was adjourned to today. Today also, there is no representation on the side of the appellant The petition for enlargement of time (I.A.No. 910 of 2008) is filed belatedly and without satisfactory explanation. I.A. No.910 of 2008 stands dismissed. Consequently the appeal also dismissed for default. (HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE) es.