IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4610 of 2011 PAPPU PANDEY, SON OF SRI SRIKANT PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- ALIASPUR, P.S.- MANJHI, DISTRICT-SARAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 2 10.02.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323 and 385 of the Indian Penal Code and 3(1) X SC, ST Act. It is alleged against the petitioner to have abused the informant and snatched the article of the informant and threw away. It is submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the informant got initiated a case under Section 144 Cr.P.C and the same was decided against the informant and in favour of the petitioners and the Civil Suit is also pending between the parties as contained in Annexure- 2 and 3. It is also submitted that previously also with similar allegations, a case was filed by the informant against the petitioners. Considering the previous background of the petitioner and informant being on litigating terms, the - 2 - accusation does not inspire confidence, let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in Connection with Manjhi P.S. Case No. 101/2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran under the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)