IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7031 of 2009 Pramila Kumari, wife of Sunil Kumar, resident of village Kemra, P.O.- Chewara, District- Sheikhpura …………. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2.The Divisional Commissioner, Munger 3.The District Magistrate, Sheikhpura 4.The Executive Magistrate, Sheikhpura, P.S. and District- Sheikhpura 5.The C.D.P.O., Chewara, P.S. Chewara, District- Sheikhpura ………… Respondents ----------- 3. 04/02/2011 Though by the order of the Collector, as contained in Annexure-1, engagement of the petitioner and others as Anganbari Sevika was cancelled without any notice but the petitioner has preferred appeal before the Commissioner and has been fully heard. After hearing her, the Commissioner did not find substance in her explanations and therefore rejected her appeal. The report of the Block Development Officer, on the basis of which engagement of the petitioner has been cancelled, shows that the Centre was found closed at 9.00 A.M., petitioner was absent and the villagers complained that the petitioner visits the Centre only 5-7 days in a month and does not distribute Take Home Rasan. These are all questions of fact which this Court cannot 2 verify on the basis of documents in her favour or against her. The documents produced by the petitioner have been considered by the Commissioner and in view of the factual position, he has found the cancellation of engagement of the petitioner by the Collector as valid. This Court does not find any error in the order of the Commissioner and therefore, does not find any merit in the writ application. The same is accordingly dismissed. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)