1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 296 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1742 OF 2008 Madhukar Ramchandra Gosavi........Appellant versus Leela Jagannath Gosavi & ors........ Respondents. Mr. A.S. Khandeparkar i/b M/s. Khandeparkar & Associates for the Appellant CORAM: RANJIT V. MORE, J. DATED : 16th OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Khandeparkar learned counsel for the appellant. The Appellant is original defendant no.1 and respondent no.1 is the Plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No. 24 of 1994 filed for partition and separate possession. The trial court decreed the suit and the respondent no.1/plaintiff along with respondent no.2 held to be entitled for ½ share in the suit properties. The appellant along with respondent nos.3 and 4 jointly given ½ share in the suit property. This decree of partition and separate possession has confirmed by the lower appellate court. Both the courts below after appreciating the evidence on record concurrently held that the suit properties were jointly 2 owned by respondent no.1/plaintiff and the appellant/defendant no.1 and therefore the share as stated above came to be granted to the respondent no.1. This finding cannot said to be perverse. No question of law much less substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. Hence Second Appeal is dismissed. 2. In view of dismissal of Second Appeal. Civil application does not survive and it is also dismissed. (R.V. More, J.)