IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4386 of 2008 ANITA DEVI & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2/ 4/8/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 23.1.2008 terminating their services as Angan Bari Sevikas. The submission is that the impugned orders are in violation of the principles of natural justice when submission has also been made that issues of shifting of the Kendras to another place had not been considered. Paragraph No.14 of the writ petition specifically alleges that the order of termination has been passed behind their back with no notice to show cause. From a reading of the impugned order dated 23.1.2008 it does not appear that any notice to show cause was issued to the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though they have filed a representation before the Commissioner, received on 12.2.2008, they may be permitted to file a copy of the same before the District - 2 - Magistrate, Bhojpur. The writ application is, therefore, disposed setting aside the impugned order dated 23.1.2008 for the limited purpose of passing a fresh order on the proposed representation of the petitioners by respondent No.4, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before respondent No.4. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )