IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DECEMBER 2008 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 36330 of 2008(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.BALAKRISHNAN, ATTENDER, PULINGOME BRANCH, PADIYOTCHAL SERVICE CO-OPERTIVE BANK LTD., PADIYOTCHAL, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. PADIYOTCHAL SERVICE CO.OP.BANK LTD. PADIYOTCHAL PAYYANNUR VIA., KANNUR, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY 2. PRESIDENT, PADIYOTCHAL SERVICE CO.OP.BANK LTD., PADIYOTCHAL, PAYYANNUR VIA., KANNUR. 3. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO.OP.SOCIETIES GENERAL), KANNUR. R3 BY GOVT. PELADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.36330 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for the third respondent. Having regard to the order being issued hereunder, notice to respondents 1 and 2 dispensed with, preserving their right to move for review of this judgment, if aggrieved. The petitioner challenges an order of reversion which is stated to be made depending on the decision of the Unit Inspector. It is evident from Ext.P4 that on 18.8.2008, the Unit Inspector has issued certain instructions and Ext.P4 has not been generated by the employer society on its own. Accordingly, the petitioner may not have appropriate relief by recourse to arbitration. This is because the impugned action is generated on the instruction of the department and not merely on the decision of the employer society. Under such circumstances, it is directed that Ext.P6 will be taken up by the third respondent, WPC.36330/08 Page numbers considered and disposed of in accordance with law, after affording the petitioner and respondents 1 and 2 sufficient opportunity of being heard. Let this be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.