IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1820 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 1820 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 1820 OF 2005 Rohini Suryakant Parab & Ors. ... Petitioners V/s. The Mogaveera Co-operative ... Respondents Bank Ltd. Ms. Usha Srivastava i/b. Consulta Juris for the petitioner. Mr. A. Sayed, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. K.B. Adyanthaya for respondent No. 4. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 11th September, 2006 : 11th September, 2006 : 11th September, 2006 P.C. . The only contention raised on behalf of the petitioner is that the amount involved is more than Rs. 10 lacs and as such it is DRT alone that has jurisdiction. The judgment of Full Bench has been stayed by the Apex Court. Considering that, it will be open to respondent Nos. 2 & 4 to entertain application for execution. Whatever amounts are realised will be subject to the order passed by the Supreme Court. ( 2 ) 2. With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]