IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45651 of 2008 SURESH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 09.04.2009 Heard both sides. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse section including sections 307 of the Penal Code as well as section 27 of the Arms Act. As per the allegations in the FIR, the accused persons arrived on the piece of land of the informant with a tractor and starting ploughing the same, as result of which the standing paddy crops were damaged. Thereafter a protest was made by the informant and it is alleged that the petitioner herein assaulted the nephew of the informant(Birendra Yadav) with a Farsa on his head. Counsel for the petitioner submits that both the parties are agnates. There is already a civil litigation going on between them. Referring to the statement made in paragraph 6, it has been submitted that there is a counter version as well relating to the said occurrence. It has further been submitted that the doctor found simple injury on the head of the injured. Be that as it may, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail stands rejected. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )