THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.33629 OF 2011 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner’s representation, dated 09.11.2011, made to the respondents to grant permission to raise a structure in first floor in the existing structure in left over portion of 15 sq.yards in premises bearing No.1-1-91/B (Old No.1-91/Part) in Survey No.10/2, situated at Habsiguda Village, Uppal Kalan Municipality, Revenue Mandal, Uppal, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District. 2. It is stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of the aforementioned property having purchased the same under a registered sale deed. The petitioner is running a medical shop in the said premises since 2007 and it is the only source of his income. While so, when the respondents tried to dispossess him from the said premises in the year 2008, he filed W.P.No.4265 of 2008 and the same was disposed of with a direction to the respondents to follow the provisions of Land Acquisition Act and also not to take any steps to dispossess the petitioner without following the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act. Subsequent to the disposal of W.P.No.4265 of 2008, the respondents notified a portion to an extent of 24.99 sq.yards in the premises of the petitioner on the road abutting Tarnaka Cross Roads to Uppal under the Land Acquisition Act. All the formalities under the Land Acquisition Act are completed including the acquisition and demolition to an extent of 24.99 sq.yards except payment of compensation to the petitioner. Again when the respondents wanted to acquire the unaffected portion under the Land Acquisition Proceedings to an extent of 15 square yards in the aforementioned premises, the petitioner preferred W.P.No.21058 of 2011 and the same was disposed of with a direction to the respondents not to acquire any property in excess of 24.99 sq.yards and the respondents were also restrained from removing the structure beyond the extent of 24.99 sq.yards. Out of 40 sq.yards, due to demolition of 24.99 sq.yards, the petitioner is unable to run his business in the left over portion of 15 sq.yards and so, he approached the concerned authorities seeking permission for construction of first floor in the left over portion of 15 sq.yards through oral representations but in vain. He made a representation on 09.11.2011 for which there is no reply from the respondents. Hence, the writ petition. 3. Heard both sides. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents are not considering his representation, dated 09.11.2011, made to grant permission to raise a structure in first floor in the existing structure in the left over portion of 15 sq.yards in the aforementioned premises. Therefore, the respondents are directed to take appropriate decision in accordance with law on the representation, dated 09.11.2011, of the petitioner and pass necessary orders thereon within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _​_____________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 26th December, 2011 Note:- Furnish C.C. within two days. B/O AMD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.33629 OF 2011 Date:26.12.2011 AMD