HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W. P. No. 20696 of 2009 DATED: 24.09.2009 Between: M/s.ESN Technologies Pvt. Ltd. And six another ..... PETITIONERs AND Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corpn. Chief City Planner The Asst. Town Planner Sri Krishna Swamy .....RESPONDENTS O R D E R:- The petitioners assert that they are the absolute owners of the premises bearing Nos.8-2-248/A, 8-2-248/1/A in Ward No.8, Block No.2 situated at Road NO.3, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. While so, according to the petitioners, in the year 1995, when they made application seeking permission for construction of building, the 1st respondent agreed to grant permission on the condition the landlord should handover 10% of the site area admeasuring 324.36 Sq. mtrs. which is likely to be affected in the widening of the existing road on the southern side of the Road No.2, to the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad free of cost and without claiming compensation as per the orders issued by the Government in G.O. Ms.No.87, M.A., dated 21.2.1995, and accordingly, the petitioners surrendered 324.36 Sq. mtrs of land to the Corporation, which took possession of the same. Thereafter, the 4th respondent started making illegal constructions in the land which was surrendered to the Corporation. Then, the petitioners made representations dated 18.09.2008 and 1.11.2008 requesting the official respondents to take action against the 4th respondent from making illegal encroachments, but their grievance is that the officials respondents have neither passed any orders on their representations nor initiated any action against the 4th respondent. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Since the representations dated 18.09.2008 and 01.11.2008 said to have been filed by the petitioners are pending consideration before the official respondents and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, is inclined to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: “Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are directed to consider the representations dated 18.09.2008 and 01.11.2008 said to have been filed by the petitioners, and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably not later than six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after issuing notice to the unofficial respondent.” Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 24th September, 2009 bcj