IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52214 of 2008 1.NARESH YADAV S/O LATE RAM CHANDRA YADAV 2. CHHOTU YADAV 3. JAY PRAKASH YADAV 4. RAM AUTAR YADAV 5. BHIM YADAV (ALL SONS OF NARESH YADAV) 6. KIRAN DEVI D/O NARESH YADAV 7. FEKANA DEVI W/O NARESH YADAV 8. RINKU DEVI W/O JAI PRAKASH YADAV ( ALL R/O VILL MANPUR, P.S. DURGAWATI DIST. KAIMUR) ------- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ---- OPP. PARTY. With Cr.Misc. No.2004 of 2009 1.BARAKU YADAV S/O NARESH YADAV R/O VILL. MANPUR, P.S. DURGAWATI, DIST. KAIMUR ------ PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ---- OPP. PARTY. ----------- 03. 17.04.2009 Both the matters arise out of same police case being Durgawati P.S.Case no. 73 of 2007 and as such they have been heard together. The present order shall govern both the cases. In one case the husband of the victim is the petitioner whereas in another case altogether eight petitioners have approached this court for grant of anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Penal Code. Petitioner nos. 6, 7 and 8 (in Cr. Misc. No. 52214 of 2008) are the lady members of the family including unmarried sister-in- law. It appears that the police initially submitted final 2 form in this case. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and the fact that there is general omnibus allegation so far as petitioner nos. 6, 7 and 8 are concerned, this court is persuaded to grant them the privilege of anticipatory bail. In the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today before the court below, let the petitioner nos. 6 to 8, namely, Kiran Devi, Fekana Devi and Rinku Devi ( in Cr. Misc. No. 52214 of 2008) be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhabhua in connection with Durgawati P.S. Case no. 73 of 2007, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. So far as petitioner nos. 1 to 5 (in Cr. Misc. No. 52214 of 2008) and petitioner (in Cr. Misc. No. 2004 of 2009) are concerned; their prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected. Accordingly both the matters stand disposed of. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)