il) No, 1 TnPet :(Ciy 0 riefa Onl Thgh F 2 PITIjONii be). EI‘E vsonal ana e 1‘, nsurane ’ M ~gi’vis‘i‘onq:l‘: Office Main Road‘,'Kbr‘, Di‘sffr'ic’r l;<or‘ba (C.G. I'nsqr‘anc rou ; Orintal Ic ‘ ) , i RSUS; H \ V. ’ i» . , r‘hj Ash‘a Ba’i Mahant, W/o Lo’r awda‘sMea‘hém, age'd‘24 ear Lare ‘ laima ’T.?No.6‘8/0 c;6 pendin kbr L mi Rn 9 ribun oi‘ba I—. Rda‘s, ,avi M, years Mir fn a g fner 1 2 [Bo‘lh Réfsldents of Village KMlidr‘i T’e‘iisn a isiricifi<orba (c V 'i n/sEk/Shankar‘das, S/a. ¥ Bach'chand Mah‘an‘ri aglal 48, year' mns Claiat CT.No.O4/06 enin beog ear‘ned- A‘ional: ribunal, zDll) S'l'r'C‘l‘ . lis 'aki 'o 007‘ e 'Ltdh Diii Mger Co; , Lidh @ ba," é VE S e' / 1 in Cnfs M g bée I S/o gd Tal, K (C2). Rbs EsPonENT k ys. yaMn qs k/o D ahan’r , no e 1- nohgh jfuml uardian md‘ e‘dme‘d Addifi‘b gEpondé* N01 l Caims ,” , 5 an J i as g s, V pdg :fij il ddfi , Cam, :T: sEi; (Ca) ahanfaed 45 ears Mug y, D h asi Shankard g y. as, aed 18euris Mham, a‘ Resid‘enfsr of Village Koh or‘ esiin Khaira, Tehi Jj ) anjgir—Champa (CG r'Iver' of The Truck AmIT Kumar S/o Sa’rdev Smg aged 23 year‘s R/o Ramdeen Bea Mn S elko rdg S’ri resenf i illa Vge Diéfr‘icf an‘eef P T Bh Py HJb aarIag, Umsm uml resenfl r‘eSIdmg a’r Charhl Dstrlrr uc’ O vehice wner of l o. C.G.O4 J' 26 <mT Inira Smgh W/o Prabha ahd lo istrict aipur' (C Smgh OW f Mial ner o ar‘f ee o. C. 12 17 . d aknlqllJaiswal, aged 28 ar' Ro Afbr Tesil S’ Di‘ Uhp ) Kmcr u 2/ D R G) 8 5F1fosh l Llm yes, / hq, h hakrié sTricT anjgir-Ca‘ma (CG SCTION 24 READ WITH SECTION 151 O HE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND RULE 2‘37) OF TH CH E RULES! 1994 T lice lgSpa rk he appcan’r/insuran companyhas preferredfhi-_efiil;n fo h Te W PEI'ITION UNDER E F T E HAT‘ITSGARH MOTOR VEHICL caims l clm ai tribl f as una .r R, alpur fh '* ‘ e i/5 Ku shh All a ihrh Téhsil ;& District Kba (CG), D/o of hak, PlFy i sl , D y h gn gh N 18. /7S d T Tbanh, JaiSwal, Jp N G J 26 « case ‘in 'one S/a IGH COURT OF CHHATTISG‘H T BILASPU n’ble Shri Prashant Kumal sr T () 20/2007 ransfer Petition Civil No. PETIER ITON Oial rent Isuanc nre Coman py L. td e RSDNDS : St Ah Bi Mfnt and hers. EPENT m. sa a iha ot Ae § ppearanc Sma, counsel for the petltlone Shn Parag Kot p 2. echa counsel for the resondents No l and ' Th dy i nsion ef e matter rs listed toa for defaut of on-submis- f reh c (2) On account of dh of n RVi i the accent eat oe a Kumar n id lvm Marhal Jeep No C G 12 J 2170 on 21/10/05 two clalm invog s c h b Act Claims ases ave een preferred one before the Motor ciden Tb b Mr Aciden Caims, nunal at Kora and the another at oto ct l nuna ati Drstrrct Janlr-Cham (3 . h b y he- cases ave een preferred by theinsurance Compan on :t sbiih t e o , umsson-tat wo separate laim cases arising out f one aecident skn Vom‘ cf d ” p%®y x ot e marntamale 1n as much as on account of death of one perso Thi ppi f t io ofh two claim _ s alicaton or ransfer and consolidatn te eeig ‘cpensa‘tion on acount‘o eath of the same 'erson x n. n b b n V H AR A R S.B: Ho Miha Vrsus ; Shn Abhlshek h ir E r t § r roRAL oRDER ‘ (29.07.2010) fs proess fee for respondents No.1, 2, 6, 7 and}. Tbl Sk jgpa ) the 'enttecntl'rof arthe' dependents/claimants should be decided in only one cse. () 4 idow and minor son of deceased;_Ravi‘D.as r alias Ravi Kumar. 4 ’ Thi _ is registered asclaim case No. 68/2006vbef0re Additionl Moto A m 9 a Th pire ba a the e claimants of the claim case ‘eferd' at Kor re w s ” a r ther hand, theparen'ts an ccident Clais Tribunal; Korba. n the . _ I’ sister of the deceaSed have ‘preferredmlaim:;case‘No. 04/2006 before i1 dditional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, sakti A , istrct ‘Janjir- hampa, The :widow and minor. son of’the deceased,‘ who ar ,claimants‘in the claim petition preferred befOre the Additional Motor ccident Claims Tribunal, Korba are arra§ed in this application a i" I A s non-applicants No.1 ' and .2 and are r'epiesented by Shri Parag ‘Kotecha, Advocate ( a n r 5) In course of argument; ShriPrag Kotecha'learned cousel fo he non—applicants No. 1 and 2, on instructions, submitted'that he has o oection if the claim case preferred by them which is, pending at Korba is-iransferrod o the Additioii‘ai Motor Accident caim K z runa, Sakti, where claimacase preferred by parents and sste, o te deceased is endin.“ (6) Theyre’spondents No. 3, 4 and 5 have been served i th otice of this transfer petition. Respondent‘Noo is thedriVer th n H bfe ruck; respOndent No.7 is the ownerfo‘f vehicle No. ,C.G. 04 .1321 6 t 8 nd respondent No.8ii’s the owner of Marshal Jeep N. CG 12 w P22 ilm ll d d Di g C é e . t ? n bj _ i ls , Tibl ir f h pg wth e a o J i v 1 toug notwes have not been served on respondents No 6 7 '_ and 8 and smce the contestmg non-apphcants/clalmants of the clann ‘ ‘ petltlon pendmg at Saktl have chosen not to appear 1n thls court even ‘aiter recelpt of notlce and smce the proceedmgs 1n both clann casesj p have been stayed by an Interim order of thls court passed on' L ‘ 15/10/07 1t 1s ordered 1n the mterest ofjustlce that the clalm case No 7 68/2006 preferred by non-apphcants No 1 and 2 pendmg before the 5 L ' Add1t1ona1 Motor Accldent Clalms Trlbunal Korba 1s transferred for H I ,consolldated heanng along Wlth clarm case No 04/2006 pendrng Tnbunal? Saktl, Drstrrct ‘ ,0 » Janjgrr—Champa I (7) On recelpt of the file the Addltlonal' Motor Accrdent Clarms E Tnbunal Saktr Drstnct JanJgIr-Champa, shall Issue fresh notlce to all the partres 1n both clalm cases and thereafter proceed w1th the enqurr' i ‘ 1n accordance w1th law ‘ l " ; (8"),6 The msurance company shall be at hberty to move approprrate‘ :0 ’applrcatron before the Addrtlonal Motor Accldent Cla1ms Tnbunal Sakt1 D1str1ct Janjgrr-Champa for treatlng both cla1m cases as one 8 case and to proceed w1th the enqulry thereafter Sdl- Prashant kumar Mlshra L 270 hh . a _ y "