IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33800 of 2011 1.Bhikhri Pal. 2.Sipahi Pal, Both Sons of Rudal Pal. 3.Malakh Pal, Son of Late Jhakri Pal. 4.Lorik Pal, Son of Late Jhakri Pal. 5.Sunil Pal. 6.Sukat Pal. 7.Raghumal Pal, Nos. 5 to 7 Sons of Malakh Pal. 8.Dhrub Pal, Son of Mahesh Pal. 9.Shyam Sundar Patel, Son of Late Haradev Patel. 10.Bharat Sahani, Son of Rajdeo Sahani. All are resident of Village D.K.Shikarpur, P.S. Shikarpur, District West Champaran. -------Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party --------------- 03/- 24/10/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the ten petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 436 of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case. Submission is that all except petitioner nos. 4 and 6 carry general and omnibus allegation and petitioner no. 4 though carry allegation of inflicting injury upon Raiful Mian by Farsa, but the injury report indicates that he sustained skin deep simple injury. Similarly, petitioner no. 6 also carries allegation of inflicting injury upon the informant by Farsa, but injury report does not indicate any injury sustained by him by sharp cut weapon. There is counter version also by way of Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 259 of 2011. While, objecting the prayer, learned counsel for the informant tried to laid emphasis that these two petitioners (Nos. 4 & 6) carry some criminal antecedents and reportedly absconders in such case. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 260 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for three years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)