IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01.07.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.MALA CRL.R.C.No. 611 of 2009 Velu .. Petitioner/Accused No.1 ..Vs.. State by Inspector of Police Vappoor Police Station Virudhachalam. Cr.No.76/2003 .. Respondent Prayer:- This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 read with 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records pertaining to Crl.A.No.135 of 2006, dated 27.05.2009 and set aside the judgment passed by the learned Additional District Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No.3), Virudhachalam, confirmed the judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Virudhachalam, in C.C.No.121 of 2003, dated 17.10.2006. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Krishnan For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias and Ms. M.F.Shabana Govt. Advocate (Crl. side) ORDER Mr.R.Krishnan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that to-day, he has filed change of vakalat for the revision petitioner herein. He further submitted that his client/the revision petitioner has preferred this revision against the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No.3), Virudhachalam, in Crl.A.No.135 of 2006, confirming the judgment of conviction and sentence, dated 17.10.2006, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Virudhachalam, in C.C.No.121 of 2003 for the offence under Sections 279, 337 (3 counts), 338 (3 counts), 304(A) (7 counts) and 201 I.P.C. But, the sentence imposed by both the Courts below has been undergone by the revision https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner. Hence, the criminal revision becomes infructuous. 2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) filed a report from the Inspector of Police, Veppur Police station, Cuddalore District, stating that the revision petitioner/accused has already undergone the period sentenced by the trial Court and confirmed by the first appellate Court. Since no suspension of sentence has been given by this Court, nothing survives in the criminal revision. 3.Considering the submissions of both sides, since the revision petitioner has already undergone the period sentenced by both the Courts below, nothing survives in the revision. Hence, the criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar kj To 1.The Additional District Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No.3), Virudhachalam. 2. The Judicial Magistrate No.1 Virudhachalam. 3.-do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Virudhachalam. 4.Inspector of Police Vappoor Police Station Virudhachalam. 5.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras. 6.The Record Keeper,Crl.Section, High Court, Madras. SGL(CO) km/19.7. CRL.R.C.No. 611 of 2009 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/