IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH R.F.A. No. 2402 of 2004 Date of decision December 6, 2006 Sukhbir Singh .......Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL Present:- S/Sh. Ram Chand , Advocate Rajiv Sharma, Advocate Sanjay Bansal, Advocate R.A. Yadav, Advocate Sanjay Mehta, Advocate Adish Gupta, Advocate Gaurav Kathuria, Advocate Vikram Chaudhary, Advocate Diwan Adlakha, Advocate Navjinder S. Sidhu, Advocate Sanjay Vermani, Advocate Vikas Awasthi, Advocate Vikas Jain, Advocate Adarsh Jain, Advocate Sh. H. S. Hooda, Advocate General, Haryana with Sh. Ramesh Hooda, Advocate for the State. Sh. Raman Gaur, Advocate **** Viney Mittal, J (oral) The learned counsel for the parties very fairly state that the controversy involved in the present appeals as well as the cross objections filed by the claimants are squarely covered by a judgment dated May 3, 2006 passed in RFA No. 2501 of 2001 (Ved Pal and others Vs. State of Haryana and others). In view of the aforesaid fact, all the present appeals and R.F.A. No. 2402 of 2004 -2- the cross objections are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated May 3, 2006 passed in Ved Pal's case (supra). (VINEY MITTAL) JUDGE December 6, 2006 archana