ssp 1 WP 1749 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1749 OF 2011 Reliance Communications Ltd. and Ors. .....Petitioners versus Municipal Corporation of Thane and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.J.J.Bhatt, Senior Advocate with Ms.Anjali Chakurkar i/by M/s.Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt and Caroe, for the petitioners. Mr.N.R.Bubna, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATE: 4th MARCH, 2011. P.C. : 1. By way of this petition, petitioners have challenged the notices issued by the respondent-Corporation under Section 260(1) and (2) of the B.P.M.C.Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in connection with the subject matter, petitioners would like to make appropriate representation to the respondent No.2 within a period of two weeks from today. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that out of 90 towers, there is a disconnection regarding one tower. Since the learned counsel for the petitioners has shown willingness on behalf of the petitioners to make representation to the respondent No.2, we permit the petitioners to make appropriate representation within a period of two weeks from today. In case such representation is made, the respondent ssp 2 WP 1749 of 2011 No.2 after hearing the concerned parties, shall take appropriate decision within a period of four weeks thereafter. Whatever may be the decision, it may be communicated to the petitioners forthwith. Till the decision is taken and for a further period of two weeks from communication of such decision to the petitioners, existing status quo to be maintained by the respondents. In case, the decision is against the petitioners, it will be open to them to challenge the same in accordance with law and as deemed fit. 2. In view of what is stated above, writ petition is disposed of. ( A.A.SAYED, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )