1 SlffS ^ ,fe° ^•^^•^" ^^-a"°"., .. ^''-'\ <'f\..ll-J ^-"^,^'' ^>-^" -,,v^'- ^,.-' '\,~^~ ^,*' IN THE HMtt COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) N0. ^ Ll /201(^ PETITIONER : Sanjay kesharwani S/o M.L.Kesharwani Aged about 43, years Occupation teacher R/o Radhakrishnan, Word No.l5,Kawardha, District -Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^2. District Education Officer, Kawardha, Disst:kabirdham (C.G) . 3. Block education Officer, kawardha Disst: kabirdham (C.G) /-4. Joint director, Public instmction, Raipur,Disst.Raipur (C.G.) ^5. Principal, Govemment girl's higher secondary School, Kawardha Disst. Kabirdham (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (S) N0.94 OF 2011 Sanjay Kesharwani Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others Gowri (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K, Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Deepak Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 21st day of January; 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the circular dated 5-3-2008 (Annexure - P/1), a committee has been constituted to consider the case of daily wagers for regularization, thus the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the said Committee and the Committee may be directed to consider the case of the pstitioner at the earliest. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the state submits that no permission to approach the Committee is necessary; however, if a representation is made by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law as early as possible. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty and observations. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge