HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.1537 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.01.2011 **** M/s. Inde Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. . . . . Petitioner VS. DRT-I & Anr. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Amar Vivek, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. VV Diwan, Advocate for respondent No.2 ***** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner seeks stay of recovery proceedings during the pendency of the matter before the learned DRT-I, Chandigarh. (2). While issuing notice of motion, further recovery was stayed against the petitioner vide order dated 29.01.2010 subject to its depositing Rs.5 lacs. The petitioner has deposited the said amount with the Recovery Officer which has since been released in favour of respondent No.2-Bank. (3). The DRT-I is presently functional. (4). The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the DRT-I to make an endeavour to decide CWP No.1537 of 2010.doc - 2 – the pending proceedings as early as possible and preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (5). The parties are directed to appear before the DRT-I on 16.02.2011. (6). Till the matter is decided by the Tribunal, the ad interim stay order dated January 29, 2010, shall continue to operate. (7). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 25.01.2011 Vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge