IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3930 of 2010 RAMESHWAR PRASAD S/O LATE RAMJEE PRASAD R/O VILL.- NANHOSATI, P.O.- RAM NAGAR BANKAT,VIA- JAGDISHPUR, P.S.- MANJHAULIYA, DISTT.- WEST CHAMPARAN ( BETTIAH ) Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE CHIEF SECRETARY BIHAR 3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ANIMAL HUSBANDARY DEPTT. BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DIRECTOR ANIMAL HUSBANDARY DEPTT. BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE DIRECTOR CO-OPERATIVE DEPTT. BIHAR, PATNA 6. THE DIRECTOR PROVIDENT FUND BIHAR, PATNA 7. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL BIHAR, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA 8. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER WEST CHAMPARAN ( BETTIAH ) 9. THE DISTRICT VETENARY OFFICER WEST CHAMPARAN (BETTIAH) 10. THE BLOCK VETENARY OFFICER null MANJHAULIYA, WEST CHAMPARAN ( BETTIAH ) 11. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR CUM MEMBER SECRETARY THE NATIONAL CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. WEST CHAMPARAN 6 18.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also the respondent State and the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is of non-payment of pensionary benefits due to him upon his superannuation on 30th of April 2009 while working on the post of Live Stock Assistant under Block Vaterenary Officer Manjholiya District- West Champaran Bihar. It is further submitted that it has been incorrectly stated in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State that pension paper has not been submitted by the petitioner as required under the Bihar Pension Rules whereas the pension papers were submitted in the month of February 2010 enclosing the relevant papers. Learned counsel further submits that the - 2 - petitioner has not been paid his salary for the period July 1997 to June 2004 which would be apparent on perusal of the letter dated 7th of January 2010 (Annexure- 5) written by the National Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Bettiah, West Champaran whereas the service of the petitioner was sent by the Co-operative Department Government of Bihar. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the claim of the petitioner as highlighted in this writ application as also the statements made in the supplementary counter affidavit as well as the rejoinder needs to be verified from the record in order to take appropriate decision on the claims of the petitioner. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the grievances as highlighted in this writ application petitioner proposes to file separate representation before the respondent nos. 4 and 5 with a copy to respondent nos. 7 and 11. In case such representations are filed stating distinctly details of the unpaid claims as also the relevant copy of the present order, the same be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of the representations. Upon consideration, in case the representation of - 3 - the petitioner is accepted the necessary sanction order be issued so as to enable the petitioner to receive the admitted dues with interest permissible under the rules. However, upon consideration, if any claims or part of the claims of the petitioner are not being paid the same may be communicated to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Amrendra ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.).