THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION NO.31776 OF 2010 Between : Yalamanchili Gowranga Babu, S/o. Sita Ramiaiah, R/o. D.No.54-12-22/3, Auto Colony, Vijayawada, Krishna District. …... PETITIONER And 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Municipal Commissioner, Vijayawada Municipal Corporation, Vijayawada, and others. …....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Vinay Kamisetty Counsel for the respondent No.1: Smt. G. Jhansi Counsel for the respondent No.3 to 5: G.P. for Revenue The Court made the following. ORDER: Heard Sri Vinay Kamisetty, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. G. Jhansi, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 The petitioner claims to be the absolute owner of plot No.23 in site No.10 bearing LP.No.49/84 admeasuring an extent of 503.25 sq. yds., situated in RS.No.468 (part) and 493 (part) of Jawahar Auto Nagar, Vijayawada, having purchased from the Municipal Corporation, Vijayawada under a registered sale deed vide document No.910/2003 dated 8.04.2003. The petitioner states that the approach road to his plot has been encroached by raising huts, and the 1st respondent- corporation, who alienated the land in his favour, is under obligation to get the encroachments cleared and provide access to his plot. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite his submitting representations dated 5.10.2000, 7.11.2009 and 6.04.2010 to the 1st respondent, the first respondent has not taken any action. The limited grievance pleaded in this writ petition is to direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the said representations. The learned Standing Counsel Smt. Jhansi contends that there are no such representations received from the petitioner and in fact the Corporation is not competent to redress the grievance of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner however asserts that representations have in fact been made. Should such representations are found to have been received by the 1st respondent, the first respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon and communicate the same to the petitioner as early as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of as above. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J. 24th December, 2010 Js.