..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1178 OF 2007 Shri Pankaj Ramesh Patil ...Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.D.C.Mishra, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 10th April, 2007. DATED : 10th April, 2007. DATED : 10th April, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.I-125 of 2007 of Mahatma Phule Chowk Police Station, Kalyan, District - Thane. 3. It is seen that the applicant has directly approached this Court for anticipatory bail. In my opinion, it would be appropriate that the applicant prefers necessary application for anticipatory bail before the concerned Sessions Court. Liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer necessary application for anticipatory bail ..(2).. before the concerned Sessions Court. 4. To enable the applicant to prefer said application before the concerned Sessions Court, the applicant is granted interim protection upto 17th April, 2007. In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the applicant to be released on bail on furnishing one surety in the sum of Rs.10,000/-. It is made clear that this order of interim protection will remain in operation only upto 17th April, 2007. 5. The learned Advocate for the applicant undertakes to give advance notice to the concerned Investigating Officer in respect of moving the Sessions Court. 6. Application is disposed of. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)