' -•* SSS MMI m^ Sins' - T-'a •-^. BEFORE THE HIGH CGURT GF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP-l°^^~/2005(SB) Otfaer Matters PETITIONER DEFENDANT-1(A) 1 ^^ .^^- ^^ ^^ ^^^ »s^- RESPONDENTS : PLAINTIFFS Defendaut-1 (3 ) M^i^'<^ Defendant-1 (b) ^. ^ lalaya Commercial Complex Pvt. Ltd Supela, Bhilai, Po. Supela, Distt: Durg Chhattisgarh. Throughits Director: Saatosh Golctiha S/ol.ate Shri Kewal Chand Golchha, aged abut 52 years, Director and Chainnan ofM/sHimalaya Commercial ComplexPvt. Ltd,,§)ipela, Blulai, tesident ofUshaKrishBatMaIviya Nagar,Durg(CG). VERSUS Ql. Bhflai Builders Pvt. Ltd. Tbrough Director Smt. Madhu Jain at B-2/11, RavtBhawan, G.E. Road, Po. Distt: Rajpur (CG). 02. -Gulab Ghand ajged about 44 year& S^LateLatGhandJaiBRyoSamdlri BazarDurg, Eo. & Distt:Ourg (CG). 03. KislK)reJaiaagedabout41yearsS/o Lakhand Jaia R/o:Samchai;i Bazar. 6urg, Po.&Distt:Durg(CG). 04. M/s Lease aad rents, Bata India Ltd. Through Thie Manager, 6-A, S.N. BaiifirjeeRoad,;Kolkata-13,Pm-700013. 05. DilipGotehhaDirectQrHimalaya Commercial Compl&x Pvt. Ltd R/o 36, AyodhyaComplex,MalviyaNagar,Po. & Distt: Durg (CG). Petition imder article 226/227 oftihe Constitution effiidia - For issuance ofafwrit ofmandamus and ceitmrarf aad anv other writ/diTectioB/order. Defendant-1 (A ) ^ XI-HC-22 311^1 ^T R-f 3TI^T Sh*< ul6(t r?-~ <-•- 3^-<tl<);l!l<l,^Tl1*f're,5fG|ctlyy< 311^1 ^ach ^.^:.^!?.:.^.k2^ioo£ R'b^ 3f 1^1 ^•WIW(rf?tT 23-3-2005 Shri B.R, Ghosh,Advc|cate for the pefitioner. Heartl. Leamed Gouasel for t(ie petitloner submits that a suit has been fited by responde^it no. 1 - Smt. Madhu Jam. He fartfajer subiuits that respo^dent no. 2 - Gulab Chand aiid respondent no, 3 Kishois < the suil. AuappIicaUiuuwai repeafed aad direction h^ case aud material on recordj ofjustice wiU be served if directiori to the peti.tion.er to fhe grounds available unde^ pai'Ucs. Subject to ttie abo^ disposed of at this stage. Con.sequently, M.(W.)| 1983/ 2005 also stand disp^aed, qii<if'?i<fl-i <HiiciTffteA' <Ri+di< ^srf^ran^T aiit faave wrpngly been joiaed in mcd uuder Oidcr 1 Rule 10(2) of C.P.C. for deletmg flieir nataes on the ground fhat they arc not the directors 6f the co4ipany; This contention has been is been issued to file writfen steteinent, Havuig coysidenid. tli(; facls aud t'iruuuustayces of the iuftie oftfais Coiirt, ends [he petition is disposed of wifh a file wntteD. stateinent and take aU fhe law iacludirig nusjoiuder of observations, tfae petition is No. 839/2005 aad I.A. No. Sd/- Ealshruddin Judge ('ft^yai^