IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12508 of 2011 SUDHIR YADAV @ DINESH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sangrampur (Tetiabammar) P.S. Case No. 86 of 2010 registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The specific accusation of firing is against Mukesh Yadav whereas the general accusation of assault to the father of the informant is against all the accused persons Raj Kumar Paswan and Shanti Devi alleged to have assaulted by Lathi. There is no specific accusation against the petitioner. In the post mortem, injuries on parietal area have been found. Title suit was going on between the parties and the petitioner is government servant. It is further submitted that similarly situated accused person, namely Radhe Yadav, has been granted bail by the learned sessions Judge. 2 Taking into account that accusation of assault on the head of the informant was against Bhushan Yadav @ Shashi Bhushan Yadav, I see no reason for the learned court below not to give the privilege of bail to the petitioner if the petitioner surrenders and prays for bail within a period of four weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)