/ 1/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2758 OF 2004 Shri.Waman Bandu Jagtap ...Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Ms.Gunjan Shah i/b. S.A. Sawant for Petitioner. Mr.C.R. Sonawane AGP for Respondent No.1 to 4. Mr.R.V. Govilkar for Respondent No.6. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & V.M. KANADE, JJ. DATED : 19th MARCH, 2008 P.C.:- 1. Heard learned counsel for both the sides. Perusal of the Petition shows that the Petitioner has raised disputed questions of fact. The Petitioner is seeking a direction to the Respondent No.5-Corporation to remove encroachments, which according to the Petitioner, has been made by the members of the Respondent No.6-Society on public road. The / 2/ Petitioner is also seeking a direction to the Respondent No.5-Corporation to demolish certain construction, because according to the Petitioner, that construction has been made by consuming more FSI. The Petitioner is also seeking a direction against the Respondent No.2, 3 and 4 to expel certain members of the Respondent No.6-Society. The Petitioner is also seeking a direction to the Respondent No.6- Society to permit the Petitioner to make construction on the plot. The Petitioner is, however, not in a position to point out that there is any sanctioned building plan. They are purely disputed questions of fact that cannot be investigated in a Writ Petition. Appropriate remedy available to the Petitioner is to file a civil suit in the Civil Court. 2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that though the Petition is being rejected, the interim order which is presently operating, should be continued for a period of four weeks. We are not inclined to continue interim order which has been granted by this Court because it is a blanket order directing the maintenance of status-quo in relation to the entire lay out because an allegation is made that some construction is likely to come up on a play ground. Though we are dismissing the petition, we direct the ad-interim order in terms of prayer clause(g) is granted and it will operate for a period of four weeks from today. / 3/ . Writ petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. ( D.K. DESHMUKH, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)