IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 11938 of 2010(N) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ MUHAMMED SHERIF, S/O.MUHAMMED ALIAS BAVA, CHELAMPRA P.O., TIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.G.HARIHARAN, MR.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUR. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, THIRURANGADI TALUK, THIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHELAMPRA VILLAGE, THIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. AHAMMED KUTTY, S/O.UNNIKOYA, KALLUVALAPPIL HOUSE, IDIMUZHIKKAL, PIN - 673 634. 5. SAIDALAVI, S/O.MUHAMMED MASTER, KOPLAKKATTU HOUSE, CHELAMBRA P.O MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 6. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM. R1 TO R3 & R6 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.P. NARAYANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/04/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.11938 OF 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of April, 2010. J U D G M E N T By Exhibit P4 proceedings, a permit was given to the petitioner for levelling a plot of land in resurvey No.101/15 covered by Exhibit P1. Certain conditions have been imposed in Exhibit P4 for executing the work. The petitioner thereafter submitted Exhibit P5 request seeking for permission for levelling the land mentioned in Exhibits P2 and P3. It appears that there were some objections from the 4th respondent in the matter. Ultimately, by Exhibit P9, the Revenue Divisional Officer cancelled the permit on finding that there are violations of the conditions imposed. 2. It is contended by the petitioner that Exhibit P9 order was passed without hearing the petitioner. It is also submitted that the facts stated in the order are not correct also. Seeking for reconsideration of the matter, the petitioner has filed Exhibit P10 representation before the Revenue Divisional Officer W.P.(C) No.11938/2010 2 itself. It is pointed out that Exhibit P10 has not been disposed of so far. Heard the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. There will be a direction to the Revenue Divisional Officer namely, 1st respondent herein to take a decision on Exhibit P10, with notice to the petitioner and respondents 4 and 5, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition for compliance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp