c^u CTO f'fs ". '• ^-.. ^Ss, v.'-^ \' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH PETITIONER'S ,^>:.. ^s^ .••!'A'..-"' . ^^.-••' ^•' <^'\r?- ^^ ^' ^ '0> rvy W.P.(S) Ho.-^H^^ / 2006 1. Narendra Kumar Jogi, S/o. Shri Budhram Jogi, aged about 47 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Buniyadi Primary School - Dondi, Block - Dondi, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) 2. Ct^bi Lal Sangsurtan, S/o. Shri Sukhchand, aged about - 47 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. 1 Primary. School- Bangaon, Block Dondi, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) 3. RESPONDENT'S 4. VERSUS Johan Ram Mandavi, S/o. Shri Sankunwar Ram Mandavi, aged about 50 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Boy's Hostel - Gujra , Block - Dondi, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) Salik Ram Lahri, S/o. Shri S. Lahri, aged about 48 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School - Patharatola, Block - Dondi, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) State of Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary Department of Tribal Welfare D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, Chhattisgarh Government Raipur ••^^f^fi';^^f^^ S%m—?i 3E^- 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, District- Durg (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block - Dondi, Distt.- Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTlTUnONOF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT, WRITS, DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.fS) No. 7499 of 2006 Petitioners : Narendra Kumar Jogi ando'thers Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh A others SB: Hon'bfe Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Present: Mr. A.S. RnAwit, counsel for Ihe petitioners. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy fiovemnient Advocute for •the State/reapondents. ORDER O'assed on rtiis 9th doy of Jonuary, 2007) The folfotwng order of the Court is pnssed by Satfeh K. Aydhotri. J. 1. Leamed counsel oppearing for •the peth-ioners ois «»enas for the Storte/reqiondents jointly submit -thnt the facts of the present writ petition are similar to that of in W. P. (S) No. 8976/2006 (Sushil Thinri and others vs. State Sovemment of Chhattisgarh <S others), which *ws albwed vide order dated 7.11.2006(Amiexure P/5). They further submit that the questton of taw involved is also the aame. 2. In view of the txbove stated submissions made by leamed counsel for •the parties this petition is allowed in terms of the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by this Court- in 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari ond others vs. State Sovemment of Chhuttisgarh A others). No order as to costs. &iM»dt Sd/- Satish K. Agnifaotri Judge ^'