WP(C) 1596/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA. The petitioner, who was aspirant for the post of Excise Constable, has filed thi s writ petition questioning the very selection process, in which he participated , but could not qualify. The petitioner could clear the physical test etc. and a lso appeared in the oral interview. His name having not been included in the Sel ect List, he has questioned the procedure adopted in the selection. In paragraph 8 of the wit petition, the petitioner has stated that some of the candidates (w ithout naming them) although did not qualify in the Physical and Medical Fitness Test, but were called for oral interview. Some candidates, not sponsored by the Employment Exchange, were also allowed to participate in the selection process. With the above vague and indefinite statement and without giving the names of th e persons concerned and arraying them as party respondents, the petitioner seeks setting aside and quashing of the entire Select List, in which 98 selected cand idates have been included. None of the candidates is the party respondent to thi s proceeding. Under similar situation, this Court has already dismissed the writ petition bei ng WP(C) No.763/2011 (Kingumani Sarma & Ors Vs. State of Assam & Ors) by judgmen t and order. Accordingly, in terms of the said judgment and order, this writ pet ition is also dismissed.