IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26620 of 2010 SAHID @ PRINCE Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 16.12.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Torture for demand of dowry followed by ouster from the matrimonial house is the allegation, but at the same time, in written application itself it is given that it was informant’s next marriage without mentioning divorce or death of first husband not justifying refusal of anticipatory bail for the offence under section 498A of the I.P.C. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa P.S. Case No.341 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.) 2