WP(C) 3566/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K.SHARMA. Heard Mr. J.I. Borbhuiyan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms R. Chakraborty, learned Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate. The petitioner, who is a Gaon Panchayat Secretary, is aggrieved by the A nnexure-16 order dated 16.6.2010, by which he has been transferred from 39 No. P ub-Natun Dehar G.P. to 36 No. Pub-Dharmapur G.P. According to the petitioner, apart from being subjected to frequent tran sfer, the impugned order has been issued, as the petitioner declined to pass an illegal bill. The respondents have filed their counter affidavit, in which it has been stated that the petitioner had to be transferred from the present place in view of the complaints received against him. As per the said complaints, the petiti oner is irregular in attending office resulting in public inconvenience. Ms Chakraborty, learned State counsel has produced the relevant records including the Attendance Register, on perusal of which, prima facie, it appears that the contention raised in the counter affidavit is correct. There is nothing to indicate that the petitioner h ad been transferred as he did not pass the particular bill. Be that as it may, h aving regard to the limited scope of interference in such matters exercising wri t jurisdiction, I am of the considered opinion that the ends of justice would be met if the petitioner is granted liberty to make representation against the imp ugned order dated 16.6.2010 (Annexure-16 to the writ petition) to the appropriat e authority through the Respondent No.3, who has issued the impugned order. In t he event of making such representation within one week from today, the said auth ority may dispose of the same by a speaking order as expeditiously as possible, but at any rate, not later than 3 (three) weeks thereafter. If the stipulation m ade in this order is not complied with, there will be no further action on the p art of the Chief Executive Officer, Nalbari Zilla Parishad. For this limited pe riod of 3 (three) weeks or till the representation is disposed of, whichever is earlier, status quo as on today shall be maintained.