C-482 58 of 2003 Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. Heard Sri Ramji Srivastava learned counsel for the applicants and Sri J.P.Joshi learned counsel for the respondent no.2-wife. In view of the compromise, the applicants were directed to pay Rs.3,60,000/- (Rupees three laksh sixty thousand only ) to the respondent no.2- wife as finally settled alimony and out of that amount a sum of Rs. 1,80,000/- (Rupees on lakh eighty thousand only) was paid earlier at the time of passing of the compromise decree. The remaining sum of Rs. 1,80,000/- (Rupees one lakh eight thousand only) is being paid today by was of Bank Draft in the name of respondent no.2. Since the draft has been prepared as account payee in the name of respondent no.2, the same is delivered to the learned counsel for the respondent no.2 in the court itself in the presence of the parties. The compromise having been implemented, the proceedings in criminal case no. 1855/2002; State Vs. Rajeev Khattar and others under section 498A I.P.C. and section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act pending in the court of Civil Judge (J.D.), Rishikesh, Dehradun are quashed. (Irshad Hussain, J.) Dated 03.06.2004 Rawat