wirmEHMH fjhfgTiIiFi'Ul}! $?UEEAT§ii§§PUE E 45 3 I‘g‘UgiELLQ‘4EGUé 2%?FEAL NC}. 7 9$?- g3 $533531 éghg 3.1 Lske Manhas‘an 533w Ageé abmxr'HB yaarre, Régresen-tee} haraby Lega§ ggardEn Gama! 5353 Sfa Birju 333w. Agad Ahcmf — 3S yaam, Rafa Vijkgie Dev?uri, Tahsi§ & m5?! — Raigixr. AFFELLAHT Xi LMiv‘EPai‘uiT ETER$§3§ Hem L3? Gand Sfa '{Hau Ram Gami Agad, 359$: 22 ye; 5‘ Qccupaiian— Trude: E?iv&h FJ’G Vmage~ (33%.??3h ¢ Paiice I$4:Ei1‘:iah* Abgiahpgn T3E3i§ $1 EisEE— Raipm Sung Kim-)3? $I'cs Ehankaf Rag Qifipunge, Qccuga‘Eian— Qwnef ag’i-QK W's: Abhanpur‘ Tamii é; Disie‘ Raipm The New inrjia mmrance Campany Linfr‘meif Brgnch D%r§:ica- Nail I. Raip-ur, Thaagh: muisbnat M3nagers Eiéisiana$ agce— Kac§1§hati C§§aw¥g ,33ii {iaadi Raipur. Ekaa‘iggémii Aggggi agiéakrisegibg §23 Egiai; Ve§1ic3e Ag§ $33 RESPGNgENT fJQI‘J—é‘KPPELL‘ixNT 5 2 “W XI-HC 78 wwm’9m § 35 aw‘f’ ‘ W 200 mm (Wt?!) Learn€d counsel for the remova the defaults. As prayed, four weeks time is granted to remove the defaults. 1f the defaultS are not ~ time the appeal shall be di: further reference to the Bench. "\ Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge /l x; appellant/ prays for time to s removed Withh’l the stipulated ;missed automatically without Sdl— ‘ j} v L.C.BHAD00 a Judge ’/ r t g§$$ W “m W3“ WW%‘§@W‘ as aim am Division Bench : Hon.Shri Fakhruddin, J. 85 Hamshri L.C. Bhadooy J. 01— 1 1-2004 . Shri S.C. Verma, Advocate for the appellant. The case is listed for 0rd ere on defaults. Kindly see the crder dated 01.11.2004 passed by the Hon'ble court and the notes of D.A. and 5.0., civil since the defaults. as ppinted out by the office ‘ on 18,06.2004, have not been removed. "Max treat the appeal as automaticagmismissed ?" Sdl- w p14“? V\ “W D.R . (J) . A.R.(J) .