Criminal Revision No.1291 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Revision No.1291 of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 28.7.2011 Seenat and others PETITIONERS VERSUS State of Haryana RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Ms.Monisha Lamba, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Sandeep Mann, Senior D.A.G. Haryana. MAHESH GROVER, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing the case for some time states that the petitioners are willing to face trial in the eventuality of their being protected. This petition is therefore dismissed, as prima facie it appears that in the examination of the prosecutrix in Court she has implicated the present petitioners. It is settled law that conviction can also be based solely on the ground of the statement of the prosecutrix in the event of its being found credible. In this view of the matter, the opinion of the learned court below in summoning the present petitioners cannot be faulted with. Criminal Revision No.1291 of 2011 -2- For the afore-stated reasons, the petition is dismissed. However, in the event of the petitioners submitting themselves to the jurisdiction of the trial Court on or before the date fixed before it and making a prayer for their being enlarged on bail, the trial Court shall consider the said prayer within two days and in the event of petitioners being released on bail it shall apart from ensuring heavy surety in order to obviate any future default also free to impose any condition which it may like upon the petitioners. (MAHESH GROVER) July 28, 2011 JUDGE GD