IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPLICATION IN ELECTION PETITION NO. 3 OF 2010 IN ELECTION PETITION NO. 2 OF 2007 MR. ATISH P. MANDREKAR ... Applicant Versus MR. SOMNATH ZUWARKAR AND ANR., ... Respondents Applicant in person, present. Shri Nigel Da Costa Frias, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri R. Menezes, Advocte for the Original Petitioner. Shri A.N.S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Shri M. S. Sonak, Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 9th July, 2010 P.C.:- Applicant is present in person. Heard Shri Nigel Da Costa Frias, learned Counsel on behalf of the Applicant. Shri Costa Frias states that considering the provisions of Chapter IV of the Representation of the Peoples Act, 1951, Applicant's application is premature. Learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the application. Shri A.N.S. Nadkarni, learned Senior Counsel who appears for the Respondent in Election Petition No.2 of 2007 submits that the application is not maintainable at this stage, in terms of Section 109(2) of the said Act. The withdrawal is sought only because the application is not maintainable at this stage with leave to file it at appropriate stage in case the Applicant is interested. Considering that, the Applicant is allowed to withdraw the application with liberty to file at appropriate stage in case he desires to do the same. At present, the application is dismissed as withdrawn. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.