BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fourth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.S.KARNAN CRL OP(MD) No.13401 of 2011 A.KANDASAMY PILLAI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED - 2 Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE C.S.CID MADURAI CR.NO. 524 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.LENIN KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) Order-1982 r/w 7(1)(a)(ii) Essential commodities Act, 1955 in Crime No.524 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the respondent police seized 40 bags of PDS rice, each containing 50 Kgs from the petitioner's Flour Mill. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a false case has been foisted against the petitioner and he will not abscond or evade any due process of law and he never tamper with the witnesses and hence, prayed for anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would oppose the move for anticipatory bail on the ground that the petitioner has one previous case to his credit. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that anticipatory bail could be granted to the petitioner with certain conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Madurai on depositing a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the credit of Crime No.524 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.III, Madurai and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 8.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 04/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III MADURAI. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI. 3. INSPECTOR OF POLICE C.S.CID MADURAI. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. T.LENIN KUMAR Advocate SR. No.34807 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13401 of 2011 Date :04/10/2011 RJ/7.10.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/