IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37798 of 2010 JAI PRAKASH SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 04.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 1000 liters of country-made liquor and English wine are recovered from the shop which was let out to co-accused, Kush Nandan Rai, a license holder of English wine. So, according to the learned counsel, refusal of petitioner’s anticipatory bail never can be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. C2-6 of 2010 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sheohar at Sitamarhi subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)