IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.492 of 2009 MRITUNJAY KUMAR @ MUNNA, S/o Ramesh Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Bibiganj, P.O.- Danapur Cantt, P.S.- Danapur, Distt.-Patna ….. Petitioner Versus 01. The STATE OF BIHAR 02. Raj Kumar Gupta @ Bangali, S/o Late Hari Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Mainpura, P.S.- Danapur, Distt.- Patna ….. Opposite Parties ----------- 02 26.03.2010 After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and after having perused the record of the case, I find that the order summoning the petitioner passed on 3.10.2008 does not require any interference by this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner submitted some documents which could be considered by the prosecution, but they have never been considered by the court below. As such, there can be an element of prejudice in the trial of the petitioner. Court believes that those documents could be produced in the trial as evidence. The petitioner shall have the liberty to looking at them and setting up his defence. The petition is dismissed. P.K. (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)