IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 10 of 2006 Dushyant Kumar Tyagi. .……… Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand & another. .………. Respondents Mr. K.S. Verma, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Nandan Arya, Asst. Government Advocate for the State / respondent No. 1. Mr. Sandeep Tandon, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. According to the complaint, there are almost two identical incidents, which respectively occurred on 10th May, 1997 and 20th March, 1998. In relation thereto, the complaint was filed on 25th March, 1998. In the complaint, it has been alleged that the manner of dealing the complainant is exactly similar in course of both the incidents. The first incident occurred when a telephone connection was sanctioned in favour of the complainant and the second when the telephone connection was sanctioned in favour of the husband of the complainant. In the body of the petition, it has been alleged that the case is false and concocted. 2. Despite several opportunities given to file counter affidavit, no counter affidavit has been filed. A case, therefore, for quashing the complaint has been made out. 3. The complaint is, accordingly, quashed. The Application stands disposed of. (Barin Ghosh, C. J.) 07.03.2011 G