^..^r^ ^^SiS^- ^,.,<^^^'IV:^ ) \ ?,.^---'?^ht ^-' ^^•.'^ & SCNC^ SIN^^^' K£.rt—- C^ \G-^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPOR WRIT PETmON fS) N0. ^^ /2010 PETITIONER ^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS / 1. 2. Padumlal Sahu, aged about 51 years, Son of Shri Achchheram Sahu, posted as "Upper Division Teacher" at Govt. Middle School- Parsada (Bade), Block <& Tahsil- Sarangarh, bistt- Raigarh (C.G.) The State of Chhattisgarh, Through- The Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, bau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The bistrict Education Officer. Raigarh. District - Raigarh (.C.G.) WRTT PETITION U/A - 226 OF THE CONSTITUTCON OF INDIA w~ S S:SiK9 mOH COUKT OF CtIHATHSOARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON fS) No. 86 of2010 Amit PETITIQNER RE8PONDENT8 Padumlal Sahu. VER8U8 The State ofChhattisgarh & anoAer. Writ Petition U/A 226 Of'The Constitution Ot'In<Ua SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Assiihotri. J. Present: ShriRoopNaik^Advocatefbrthepetitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for tiha State/respondexrts. QBALQRDER (Passed on 1 lul day of January, 2010) Witihi fhe consent ofleamed coumel appearing for tfie parties, tiie petition is heard flnally. 1. Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitioxier submits fhat the petitioner was appointed imtialty as Deputy Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs. 150A on probation. Afler completion ofprobation period, ttie petitioner was granted regular pay seale. Leamed counsel fiirtfier submite that tfae issue involved ia Ifae case is asto whether fhe petitioaeris entitled to regplar pay scale with effect fi-om the date ofinitial appomtment or after Ctmipletion ofprobation period, 2. rrhe issue involved herem was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Admmistrative Tribunal, Jabalpur (for short {<the SAT") m O.A.No.2745/89 (Maothukant Yadu and 56 others vs. State ofM.P. <fe others), wherein it was held fhat the similarly situated teachers are etrtitled to re^ilar pay scale y^.ef. tfae date of initial appomtment The matter was taken up to fhe Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court, upholding the decisioii of fhe Tribunal to fhe effect Ihat the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are aititled to regular pay scale jfrom date of initial appointment. 3. In view of the submissions made by leamed counsel for the parties, the petiti<mer is granted liberty to make a representaticBi raising all his grievances in light ofthe aforestated judgmeat and in tum, tfae cotwemed respondent is directed to decide the representatioix, if any^ ia accordance wifh law, on its own merits, within a period of8 wedks from ttoe date of receipt ofthe representation, subject to verificatian offhe facts. 4. In view oftbregoing, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- s^teh^.^' AViom ^w