IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No: 8612 of 2001 Between: M/s Sri Murali Spinning Mills Ltd., Rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director B-46, Durgabai Deshmukh Colony, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Appellate Authority for Industrial & Financial Reconstructio Rep. by its Chairman. 10th Floor, Jeevan Prakash, 25, Kasturiba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi, 2 Board for Industrial & Financial Reconstruction Rep. by its Chairman. 8th Floor Annexe, No.1 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi-110 001, .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order, direction or writ particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the 1st Respondent in Appeal No.349 of 2000, 15-2-2001 as illegal, void and unjust and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to restore the case on ﬁle and consider the appeal of the Petitioner on merit and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MRP.VSANJEEVA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : ORDER: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 05-11-2008 the writ petition was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today also, neither the counsel for petitioner is present nor there is any representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ______________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J. 6th November 2008 CVRK