aiBflie Benc^ / ^ l:f \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION N0. ^-s&s'/2004 PETITIONER •y . y <^x^ Mahanand Bairagi, aged /about.25 years, son of Shri •/ Mahadev Bairagi, student, (Roll No. 141017291 resident of - Durgapur Colony, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh, presently at Hydrabad (Andhra Pradesh), throudh : His father Mahadev Bairagi, aged about 52 years, son of Manindra Bairagi, resident of Durgapur Colony, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS y ^' / 1. The Stateof Chhattisgarh, through : the Secretary, Department of Higher Secondary School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Secretary, Board of Higher Secondary School Examination, Mantralay, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Secretary, Board of Higher Secondary School Examination, Madhya Pradesh, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal(MP) / The Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, Dharamjaigarh, District - Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA, ,XI-HC-22 .u;.' iiy' StI^I'^it ft-ii.* s^av sai*ii(^ ylin i; -..^ :iil^Eb ^ ^,i;!ii.SRrt^tsp^^11@®S? 3flt?T "qa'^F o* Wqcn sblKU "^. 20B tc«i<ffl" sii^r ^mwv s 'yiHld4l4-41il<'ff'Tf?s'<t<^J''tSi< ii'arfign'aij^r OS.01.2005 Shri A.N.Bhakta, cou4sel fcr fhe petitioaer. : Siat. Fouzia Mirza, Par^el Law^er for respoudent No. 1. ^rred. this petition under Articles 226 |;India being aggrieved'by the inaction The petitioner has pre^ & 227 ofthe Constitution of| ou fhe:part oftlie respoiiden^ No,2 on the represeirtation made|by fhe petitioner to cprt-ect liis sheef issuedjbyj^iesppndent N|i The case.of fhg petitnait date ofbtrthaithc 10t11 class^jnark- ] o.2. l:i 1 y: isr is that he was fhfi regular student | » &* ofClass-IO^ and was stu4y^g JtlO Gc^nuiieat Higher-Secc^^ 'i :i! School,,Dharamjaigarii, Dis^net Raigarb. Tbe ^elitioner's aetual.J! date ofbirth is^l.7.1979, wh^ petitioner's date of_t)irfh U: u •h is evident fi-om ifhe inarK;sIleets! of' i! 1 priniary S; nuddl.e Schcjol^Aiu|iexure P-3), whereas in tlie Glass lQtl|^ inark-sheet his date of bir^li has been •wroagly nieiitioaed- a^; ! |:J 1.7.1975.- •- • It |appears fhat iaad^ertentfer by a clertcal mistake fh^ g been! inentioned as I,7;197§ 'bvl respondeiTt :No,g iu^ Ciass-lp&^ m agaiast,^|iuGtt ithe; petitioner inade a j'epreseiiJ icspondent No.2 faas iiof talfe^i any aotioa. Learaed fiounsel: '&r petitjoiier luax? be; allowed respondeat No. 2 aad; responi saine after coaslderiiig all his Lawyer has no objeGtton. tatibn, ,c)n;;/17.10^002 but'iso.&u', the petttijOiier suhiuittedl^tfliat^iftie ^> Biake a fresh . representatiBii . t<;j Eleat No;2 be directed to defcicteth^ (rievaiices, to whieli., learDlediRaael IM'. ] ! i 1 XI-HC-22 'S^'WWwWssW'Aa'i^, ^WWy- sn^r WI'^T *<1*<CTI SBIICtl"""""""""""""""'"""'^ 200 """""""""""" fe5^t""""""""' 311^1'W K-H'h S^t ?tt*iicti •M^a -i] i ^ i-i <RI^I: ^<ITW ^lfTO Hayiitg hearcl leamed coi regard t6 fhe faets.and circtUnst allowed to inake a fi''eshreprese documents to respoildent No.2 considenng l all fhe grievances docunients siibmitted'bv luin ui pass :a i^asoned; order in an ol: Ihree m.onth.s &6laifhe date ofrei If respQadeirt No.Sfeels if: representaficin a'reporf of ft petitiorier was studyiag is neces; from. that school. . With tfae ateove diTection, CoriseguGnUy, M.W.P. No 9163/04 aEsd stand disposed of.| Certi&ed copy as per rules cbl<iT<n<?li +IIH^^ |s*^l <f^i+$t< ^TSTPtPTSlJ^T .insel for the pardes and hayi&g ances'ofthe case, the peti.ti.oneris atetion'along with^aB fhe relevEult uid ia tura resporideut No.2'after raised by the petitiQner aad snpportofhis representation sUaU jectiye iganner wffhin 'a period | of ;eipt of 'Qds order.;, necessarv fhat before decidiag fhe e concemed sch.ool where fhe iary, tlien Ue caa otitam. the same tbe petition stands disposed o^; 4915/04. & I.A. Nos;9162/ffii4 Ss ^dT- L.C. Bhadoo Judge •i:r 1.1