^B- -I y I Q d CLp f^. 'K: PETITIONERS: IN THEHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.l W.P, No....s.3.3............/200( -^ '' l.Anita Mishra, D/o Late Shri .yPokharan Prashad Mishra Aged /•:''^. '"'"''" ^.••'''^'•'' .-••'. t> .•t'.\r?'!' .-••' about 34 vears, working as Asst. i^'*'/'c1'1 .<*' —v/^*.^/. ^,^^^^, z^^^.--''' "•^?.1 Teacher, R/o Baikunthpur, Tehsil Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). ^y ^- .^" ^y' ^^<0 d^ o' ^.2. Sudama Sahu, S/o Shri Sadhavlal Sahu, Aged 32 years, Working as Asst. Teacher R/o Badehardi, Tehsil Pusoure , Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary ,Public Edycation Department Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. District Education officer Raigarh, Dist Raigarh (C.G.) ?, PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI ETC. QR DIRECTION/ORDER OF LIKE NTURE ETC :- ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. Petitioners WRITPETITION (S.t N0.639 OF 2007 Anita Mlshra and another versus Respondents : State of Chhatti^arh and another Present : Mr. Harish Khuntia, counsel for the peUtioners. Mre. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER :th (Passed on 25"' Day of January, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the parties joinUy submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are squarely covered by the decision of this Couit in the case of Madan Singh vs. State af ChhaMsgarh and offiers (Writ Petition (S.) No.5742 of 2006), dated 27-10-2006. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the dasision of this Court in the matter of Madan Slngh vs. State of Chhattlsgarh and others (Supra). No order as to costs. ___^^ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gopai