% \Q,\% HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Wlit Petition ‘S! No. 7292 of 2009 Pstitioner Ashutosh Vishwakarma Versus Respondents Union of India 8t. others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotn‘ .) Shri P. Tiwan', Advocate foi‘ the petitioner. Shri Raghvendra Prdn, Advocate for the respondents. J aha 0 R D E R iota!) - ( Passed on this 14th day of day December, 2009) Heard. I 1. Learned counsel appean'ng for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with 2. . liberty to take recourse to other forum. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State has no objection. 3. In View of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as Withdrawn, with the above-stated liberty, if so advised. g” sw- “\ f. ; Satish K.Agnihotri. If Judge Thaw