COCP No. 1019 of 2007 1 In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … COCP No. 1019 of 2007(O&M) Date of decision: September 5, 2009 Amar Singh and another ..Petitioners Versus Parkash Singh and others ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr. H.R.Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 13 Mr.Taranveer Vashisht, Advocate for respondent No. 14 ,,, Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) The grievance of the petitioners in this case is that despite the status quo order regarding possession granted by this court in CWP No.7980 of 1994, the respondents are threatening to take possession of the land and also make construction on the part of the land and thus the respondents are guilty of committing contempt of this court. In support of his case, learned counsel for the petitioners has referred to the fact that an FIR has been registered against the respondents vide Annexure P-4 Two separate replies have been filed i.e. On behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 13 and 14. The allegations levelled by the petitioners have been denied and it has been stated that respondent No.14 being Mohatmim of Dera is in possession of the suit land and respondent Nos.1 to 13 are tenants over the land of the Dera. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. From the averments raised by the counsel for the petitioners, it is clear that the present petition has been filed on apprehensions only and there is COCP No. 1019 of 2007 2 no violation of the order passed by the respondents so far. Thus, I am not inclined to proceed further with this petition. Rule dishcharged. However, the petitioners shall be at liberty to seek any other appropriate remedy in accordance with law. September 5, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE