1 Farad Continuation Sheet No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3878 OF 2007 IN CRI.REVISION NO.303 OF 2007. (SMT. KISHORI KISHORE DAHIKAR..Vs. KISHORE SHANKARRAO DAHIKAR) ________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Shri D.M.Kale, Advocate for applicant. Shri A.V.Bhide, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : DECEMBER 02, 2008. 1. This is an application in an admitted revision for grant of maintenance pendente lite and litigation expenses. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant extensively and have also gone through the record of the proceedings. 3. The applicant has very chequered history of matrimonial life. She was married in the year 1989 and gave birth to a son in 1990. There have been disputes, which led to separation of the parties. On 10.12.1994 the parties re-united on applicant's undertaking that she 2 would behave properly. Thereafter the petition for divorce was filed by the respondent bearing No.164/1996. In that case, interim alimony @ Rs.550/- per month was awarded on 17th March, 2001, which has been allegedly not paid by the respondent. Therefore, the applicant filed application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for maintenance. This application was contested by the respondent and after hearing both the sides and considering the evidence tendered, the learned Judge, Family Court, Nagpur rejected this application. This is how, the applicant is before this Court. 4. In the context of above referred facts the applicant cannot be granted maintenance-pendente-lite and litigation expenses in this proceedings. She can execute order which has already been passed in H.M.P. No.164 of 1996. The application is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE RR.