1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4276/2007 Tejaram vs The State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : - 19.7.2007 HON'BLE MR.PRAKASH TATIA,J. Mr. DK Gaur,for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. According to the petitioner himself when loan was taken on truck, he also applied for the loan and purchased the truck along with respondent No. 6. According to petitioner the vehicle in question was seized in some proceedings and it was got realeased by the respondent no.6 vide order Annex. 3. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the respondent No. 6 agreed that the loan amount will be paid by the respondent No. 6 and there will be no responsibility and liability of the petitioner against the loan taken for the said truck. It is also submitted that petitioner informed the respondent Rajasthan Financial Corporation about this fact and the respondent-RFC issued notice for recovery of the amount to the respondent No.6. However, the respondent-RFC also issued notice for the recovery of some amount to the petitioner. According to learned counsel for the petitioner in view of undertaking of the 2 respondent No. 6 that he will pay the total loan amount to the RFC and petitioner shall not be responsible, the respondent-RFC cannot recover any amount from the petitioner. The argument advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner is devoid of any force because of the plain and simple reason that RFC is not bound by any private agreement of the petitioner and respondent No. 6 and, therefore, the respondent-RFC was fully justified in taking action for recovery of the loan amount from both the parties by issuing the notice for recovery of the amount. Hence, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-