IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19091 of 2009 AJAY PRASAD @ AJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 08.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is a Panchayat Teacher. The differences were prevailing in between Mukhiya and Panchayat Sachiv due to genuine selection of the petitioner, for which allegation under Section 379 of I.P.C. is super addition and the petitioner is apprehending his arrest. Though offence under Sections 353 of I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act were also attributed but in course of investigation, that found no corroboration from the material collected by the I.O. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 236 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Motihari, East Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)