1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R Arjun Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 2675/2008 ......... Date of Order : 12/05/2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. A.K.Singh for the petitioners. Mr. L.D.Khatri for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioners is that the post of Revenue Appellate Authority was vacant and therefore, the appeal could not be heard and decided, however, he submits that now the post of Revenue Appellate Authority has been filled and officer has been posted and therefore, counsel submits that the Revenue Appellate Authority respondent No.3 may be directed to hear and decide the appeal expeditiously. In this view of the matter, the writ petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as having become 2 infructuous. However, the respondent No.3 Revenue Appellate Authority is directed to hear and decide the appeal pending before it filed by the petitioners utmost expeditiously. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp 3 S.B.Civil Misc. Stay Petition No. 4826/08 In S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 2675/2008 Date of order : 12/05/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. A.K.Singh for the petitioners. Mr. L.D.Khatri for the respondents. Since the main writ petition itself has been dismissed, the interim stay order dated 25.4.2008 stands vacated and stay petition is also dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp