PETITIONER (REVISIONER) VERSUS RESPONDENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT — BILASPUR CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION N ilSING OUT OF ORDER. DT REVISION NO. 9912007 BY S TH ADDITIONAL SESSION JUDGE L. C. Sonwane, Aged — 51 years, Son of Late B. Sonwane R/o 42/27, Mother Teresa Nagar, Bhilai, P. S. — Chhavani, District ~ Durg (. G.) \ Anil Singh, aged — 40 years, Son of B. P. Singh R/o MIG -C/2290 C. . Housing Board, Industrial Area Jamul, P. S. — Jal, District — Durg (C. G.) PETITION UNDER SECTION — Q9_D_E__191§ :_ O. i l! ‘ OF 2010 20 11 2009 PASSED IN CRIMINAL MT KANTA MARTIN, 12 , DURG (C G ) C — G mu / 482 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE WW,WW,1%IW (,(O C1? ‘m? F [o mm 1 vi zoo mm (Wu) mmm ammm mmm WW fsétFagrt $aimm SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindi'a Mohan Shrivastava, J. 20-09-2010 Shri Malay Kumar Bhaduri, Shri B. P. Singh, counsel fort e respondent. Heard. Learned counsel for the petiti ner submits that though this petition has been .fite‘diagainst the order dated 20-11-2009 passed by the ReviSionai'Court, by which, earlier o der dated 03-01-2007 passed by the Additional ChiefJudicial Magistrate, Durg, has been upheld and revision dismissed,this petition itself may be inaily disposed of giving iiberty to the ‘ ”petitib‘?x‘e”r"t'6 éXe’f‘cise the libetty con 'stent with the provisions contained in Section 145(2) of the Negotiable In ruments Act. in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Is Mandvi Co-op. Bank Limited v. ‘ Nimesh B. Thakare, 2010 AIR SC 581. prayer Learned counsel for the re pondent does not oppose the said In View of the aforesaid sub ission made by learned counsel for ’ the pames the petition is fnally dis sed off givmg iiberty to the petitioner ' to exerCIse rights available to him der the prowsmns of Section 145(2) .of the Negotiable instruments Act in the light of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of M/s dw Co-op. Bank Limited (supra). nsel for the petitioner. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge n