^ w^\ 1!S! THE HIGH COUR'r OF CHHATriSGAKH : BILASPUK Writ Petition No. 2580 of 2003 Petitioner Sanjay Agravval, Aged about 38 years, Partner, M/s Agrawal Consultaat aiid Engiaeers, 2/5 NehiTi Nagar, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Versus Kespoudents 1. Navkai* Constructions, A Pailnership Firai, fhrough Partner Inderchoiid Dhadiwal, 45/4 Sadar Bazar, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Alok Kiiniar, Proprietor Alok Kiraya Bhandai^ Shop No, 25, Navkar Bhawaa, Choubey Colony, Swami Almaaand Ward, Raipur (C.G.) WEn'P^ITmNJJNDl^AK^ CQNSTITUTIOHQFINDIA. (SB: Hon-T3le Shri Satish K. Aghiiiotti J.) Shri Ashok Soni, Advocate for fhe petitioner, None for Uie respondents. 2. O R D E R (Passed on tliis 17th Day ofOctober, 2008) 1. The petitioner has been payiag rent at fhe rate of Rs. 3000/- per m.onth, which would be subject to the decision of fhe Court below, Haviag regard to fh.e tacts as fhe order dated 29.4,2003 (Annexiire P/1) was iaterim ui natui'e aad resiiltmiUy, tiie petitioner was to pay Rs. 3500/- per inontb., atl the payiaents xnade duiiag tiie pendency oftlie case ia the Court below shaU be subject to the final decisiou of fhe case pendiag before tlie Court below. In view of ttie above, according to leanied couiisel appeadLfig Ibr fhLe petitioner nothiag suivives tbr adjudication ia fhis petition. He subniits that ftie petltioner be permitted to witlidraw tliis petition aad coutest tlie niatter on nierits before Uie Couil below, where the inaiu. case is pendiag. In view ol th.e tbregoitig, ftie petition is disinissed as wrthdrawn. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 3. 4. Thakur