IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-31876 of 2008 Date of decision : 01.12.2010 Manjit Singh and others ...Petitioners versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. D.S. Pheruman, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Chandu Majra, D.A.G., Punjab. Mr. B.S. Jaswal, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned State counsel has submitted that since the charges have already been framed in this case, so, the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., for quashing the FIR is not maintainable, in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Minakshi Bala v. Sudhir Sharma 1994 (3) RCR Criminal 123. 2. Faced with the situation, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioners to take all the points involved in this petition at the appropriate time of challenging the order of framing charge before the Sessions Judge along with application of condonation of delay or at any subsequent stage in the trial Court. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Needless to say that the concerned Court would consider the application for condonation of delay sympathetically. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) December 01, 2010 Judge naresh.k