THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.30310 of 2011 Dated 16th November, 2011 Between: Sri P.Niranjan Reddy …Petitioner And Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, rep.by its Executive Officer, Tirupati, Chittoor District and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri V.Eswaraiah Chowdary Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri G.Praveen Kumar For Sri A.K.Jaya Prakash Rao Counsel for respondent No.3: Sri B.Srinivas For Sri K.R.Prabhakar The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction, order or orders declaring the action of respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein are trying to dispossess the petitioner from the business leased premise in shop No.3 admeasuring an area of 15 x 20’ covered by zinc sheet shed erected by the petitioner near Arch Gate Sri Venugopalaswamy Temple, Tirumala which is exclusively belongs to Sri Swamy Hathiramji Matt, Tirupathi and Triumala even without any prior notice issued to the petitioner as wholly arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction and void and violated the principles of natural justice and affected the petitioner’s rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct respondents 1 and 2 herein not to interfere in petitioner’s leased business premise in shop No.3 which was allotted by Sri Hathramji Mutt, Tirupathi, situated near Arch Gate Sri Venugopalaswamy Temple, Tirumala, Chittoor District.” At the hearing, it has come out that the petitioner has earlier filed O.S.No.690 of 2007 for permanent injunction against the respondents and the said suit was dismissed by the civil court on 11.08.2011. The petitioner, however, did not disclose this fact in the writ petition. When this fact has been brought to the notice of this Court, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to unconditionally withdraw the writ petition. Taking a lenient view, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.37552 of 2011 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 16th November, 2011 VGB