IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.557 of 2011 DHANANJAY KUMAR SON OF SHRI SANJAY MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-PATORI WEST P.S. BIHRA, DISTRICT SAHARSA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 10.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner who has been declared juvenile in conflict with law seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 25(1-B)A, 26/35 of the Arms Act. According to the prosecution case, one motorcycle ridden by three persons, on chase was apprehended. On search, a country made revolver from dicky of the said motorcycle was recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in remand home/custody since 02.01.2011. It is further contended that there is absolutely no criminal antecedent of the petitioner. The present application is supported by an affidavit affirmed by the father of the petitioner who has taken upon himself entire responsibility respecting the petitioner if released on bail. Having considered the submissions, this Court setting aside the impugned orders, directs the petitioner to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.15,000/(fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Saharsa, in connection with G.R case no. 06 of 2011, Saharsa P.S. case no. 535 of 2010, Subject to the 2 following conditions:- (i) one of the bailors shall be father of the petitioner (ii) It shall be the duty of the father to monitor the conduct/behaviour of the petitioner and to produce him before the court in person as and when directed therefor. In case of default in such appearance the trial court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond and secure his arrest in accordance with law. (iii) During subsistency of the present privilege, if it is found that the petitioner has involved himself in another criminal case, the same shall be treated as a breach of the conditions of bail entailing cancellation. Devendra/ ( K.K. Mandal, J. )