HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26699 of 2008 Date : 08.11.2011 Between : Alpha College of Education, Podili, Prakasam District, rep. by its Secretary and Correspondent. …..Petitioner And Sri Acharya Nagarjuna University, Nagarjunanagar, Guntur District, rep. by its Registrar & another. …..Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26699 of 2008 ORDER : This writ petition is filed with the following prayer : “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings in ANU/Affil./S7/B.Ed./Payment of Fees/2006-07, dt.7.11.2007 issued by the 1st respondent herein demanding the University Development and Infrastructure fee @ Rs.4,000/- and Rs.1,500/- for 100 students even after collecting Affiliation Fee in addition to the fee fixed by the Committee for Fixation of Fee structure in Private Un-aided Professional Colleges constituted by the Government of A.P. prescribed under Andhra Pradesh Private Minority/Non-minority (Aided-Unaided) coilleges of Education (Regulation of Admissions into B.Ed., course through Common Entrance Test) Rules, 2005 made under Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1983 for 2006-07 as illegal, arbitrary, without power or authority and opposed to Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same.” When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that the subject matter of the writ petition is covered to be allowed in view of the judgment of this Court in a batch of cases in W.P.No.27195 of 2007 and batch, dated 8th February 2010. Following the above said judgment, and for the reasons recorded therein, this writ petition is allowed with the directions as under : a) The impugned proceedings, dated 07.11.2007, is set aside. b) It shall be open to the University to inquire as to whether the petitioner has collected any amount from the students, towards development fee/infrastructure fee, and if it emerges that the fee has been collected, the petitioner shall be under obligation to refund the same to the students, or pay it to the University; and c) If any statement made by the petitioner in this regard is found to be incorrect, that would, by itself, be a ground to deny the renewal of affiliation. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 8th November 2011 ajr