IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2011 / 21ST CHAITHRA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 143 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.29977/2010 Dated 08/11/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- SASIKALA, AGED 47, W/O.K.R.MOHANAN, ANJANA, MURIYAMANGALAM, MAMALA P.O., ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.MADHUSOODANAN SRI.T.V.JAYAKUMAR NAMBOODIRI SRI.THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY SRI.M.M.VINOD KUMAR SRI.P.K.RAKESH KUMAR SMT.M.A.RUXANA RESPONDENT(S): 2ND RESPONDENT ----------------------------- RENJINI RADHAKRISHNAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DEVASWOM OFFICER KOCHI PAZHAYANNUR AZHITHRIKOVIL TEMPLE, MATTANCHERY P.O., ERNAKULAM-682002. ADV. SRI.N.RAGHURAJ,SC,COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== Contempt Case (C).No. 143 of 2011 ================== Dated this the 11th day of April, 2011 J U D G M E N T Annexure I interim order has already been complied with. The Devaswom Board has certain complaints about the conduct of the petitioner in the matter. They want this Court to take serious note of the same. But, after considering the matter, insofar as the writ petition itself is pending, I think that the Devaswom Board can raise all their contentions in the writ petition. Without prejudice to that right, this contempt case is closed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge