$-55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 332/2011 ADITYA AGARWAL & ORS Petitioner Through;Mr.Siddarth Aggarwal with Mr. Simon Benjamin, Advocates versus STATE Respondent Through: Mr. Pawan Bahl, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER % 25.03.2011 The learned counsel for the Petitioners has placed on record the amended memo of parties giving exact age of the petitioner nos.4 to 7 and their correct names. The same be taken on record. This is a petition for quashing an FIR No.55 of 2001 registered under Sections 279/304A and 338 IPG at pohce station Kamla Market, Delhi against the Petitioner no.l on the complaint of Petitioner no.3 Md. Shakeel. As per the allegations in the FIR, one Bali Md., brother of the Petitioner No.3 Md. Shakeel and husband of Petitioner No.2 Mrs. Munni Begum sustained injuries while driving a TSR in an accident involving a Maruti car Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified being driven by the Petitioner No. 1. After investigation, charge-sheet was filed and during the course of proceedings, the parties have amicably settled the matter. In terms of the settlement, Petitioner No.l has agreed to pay to the legal heirs of the deceased who are Petitioner No.2 Mrs. Munni Begam, widow of the deceased, Ms. Ruksana aged 24 years and Ms. Shabnam aged 20 years, the two major daughters, Ms. Gule who aged 14 years and Mst Shokeen @ Azharuddin aged 12 years, the two minor daughter and son of the deceased, a sum of Rs.4,50,00/-. All the petitioners are present in the Court today. The Petitioner No.2, 4 and 5 and on behalf of Petitioners No.6 and 7, the Petitioner No.2 submit that they have settled the matter with the petitioner No.l and in lieu of the settlement they have received a sum of Rs.50,000/- and the balance amount k of Rs.4,00,000/- has been paid today in the Court by way of a demand draft bearing no.062793 dated 2"'' February, 2011. The Petitioner No.3, the brother of the deceased and complainant Petitioner Nos. 2, 4 and 5 submit that he does not want to pursue the present FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto as the parties have amicably resolved the matter and they would like to live peacefiilly hereinafter. The parties have entered into an agreement of their own free will. n volition and without any coercion and there is no legal impediment in quashing the abovementioned FIR. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved the differences and neither the legal heirs nor the complainantwants to pursue the abovementionedFIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In the interest of justice, it would be appropriateto quash the above mentioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. The parties have signed the ordersheet in acknowledgment of the statement made above. The petitioners are identified by their counsel and the investigating officer. The petition stands disposed of Dasti. MARCH 25, 2011 rd X, firJ^^/yv-Avv3>^ k-' 5^^ , C\ 3' M kie/U/w Ml MUKTA GUPTA,J n.