IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6330 of 2009 Between: N. Kanugonda. ... PETITIONER AND P. Madhu Naidu. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Mahadeva Kanthrigala Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Chetluri Sreenivas The Court made the following: ORDER: The revision is directed against the order of the Court below allowing E.P.No.163 of 2006 and directing the arrest of the judgment debtor on his failure to deposit the EP amount within a period of two months. 2. Accordingly, when the revision petition was initially heard on 31.12.2009, while ordering notice before admission, interim stay was granted subject to the condition of the petitioner depositing half of the EP amount before 31.01.2010. The said order has since been complied with and the respondent/decree holder, who now appears through learned counsel, reported that the decree holder has withdrawn the said amount. 3. After hearing the matter for some time, both the learned counsel state that to the extent of the remaining half of the amount, which is to a tune of about Rs.50,000/-, if some time is granted to the petitioner, the grievance in the revision petition itself would not survive. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks six (6) months time to enable the petitioner to deposit the said balance amount to which the learned counsel for the respondent/decree holder has no objection if reasonable time is granted. 4. The impugned order allowing execution petition is confirmed and petitioner/judgment debtor is permitted to deposit the balance EP amount in two equal instalments as follows: 1. First instalment due and payable on or before 15.03.2010 and second instalment on or before 15.04.2010. 2. On such deposit, the respondent/decree holder shall be entitled to withdraw the same without furnishing any security. 3. In the event of default committed by the petitioner in depositing the amount, as above, the executing Court shall given effect to the impugned order herein, as to the arrest of petitioner/judgment debtor. Subject to the above modification, the revision petition stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J February 26, 2010 DSK