Civil Revision No. 6471 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 6471 of 2010 Date of Decision: 26.11.2010 Piare Lal …Petitioner Versus Surinder Pal Singh Toor and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Rahul Rampal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Y.P. Singla, Advocate for the respondents. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner/tenant, aggrieved against the impugned order dated 14.9.2010, passed by the Rent Controller, Ludhiana, whereby the application under Order 6 Ruled 17 CPC, for amendment of the written statement, was dismissed. By way of the proposed amendment, the petitioner/tenant wanted to plead subsequent event and urge that during the pendency of the eviction petition, another shop, which was rented out by the respondents/landlords, has been vacated by another tenant and the same is available to redress their personal necessity. This plea of the tenant was negated primarily on the ground that the High Court had Civil Revision No. 6471 of 2010 2 made the case time bound. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will not take unnecessary adjournments and in case the tenant is granted proposed amendment, he will conclude his evidence, within a period of two months from today. Learned counsel for the respondents/landlords submits that the subsequent event has already been brought to the notice of the Court by leading evidence to this effect. In view of above, application for amendment is allowed. The present revision petition is accepted and the impugned order dated 14.9.2010 is set aside. Furthermore, once the amendment is carried, the tenant is directed to conclude his evidence within a period of two month. After the tenant concludes his evidence, the Rent Controller, Ludhiana, shall decide the eviction petition within a period of two months thereafter. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge November 26, 2010 “DK”