Sl?i^ ••v "«s^. IN THE HON'BLEKI6H _COUftT OF CHHATraS6ARH A~T BILASPUR l.C.C.No. 50 /Z011 Applicant >•' 1 ,^-^ ^2^ .-••"A'?i" ...•••"0. -" ,^> ,^v>^ ^ ^..^" ^c <?<a^/-" \^~ Versus Brijesh Chakravorty S/o Shri Asin Chakravorty-, Aged about 47 years, Lecturer Sovernment Higher Secondary Schoot, Portha, Btock - Sakti, Distt. Janjgir Champa-(C.G.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh,Through - .K.S. B :.6.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block - Sakti, bistt. Janjgir Champa-(C.6.) MO&IFtCATION / CORRECTION IN THE 31)^1VI V^»4i ^i 3n^fi^)*fl<ft Tumane d-ccj ^^w^,, ©xiiy'KS,tsj^, _^_ w ,c. c . fv-.JTS %^ | sn^ '^v^s (.'^y^', TCiim^fctai^ <hl«i(cpNTV^t if •fstg' <fa|^i< ^'siRwan^r SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra^MoJi ih Shrivastava, J. 29-08-2011 Shri Anil Singh Rajput, couni Shri Rakesh Jha, Deputy advance copy. ^ Heard. Learned counsel for the apf mistake, while filing writ petition, ir Court on 12th ofAugust, 2011, najne father of the petitioner were not ci] applicant submits that the correct) service records and in the appointrfient the petitioner is "Biresh Chakravoj Learned State counsel sub| well as the name of father of the pj and appointment order would alon^ In that view of the matter, i| any other order except clarifyinj recorded in the service records ^i treated as correct name. With the aforesaid observatlo el for the applicant. lovernment Advocate for the State on licant submits that due to typographical which, order has been passed by this of the petitioner as well as name of irrectly shown. Learned counsel for the name of the petitioner as recorded in order, as also the name of father of ty S/o Shri Asim Chakravorty". nits that ihe name of the petitioner as ititioner as recorded in the service book be taken as basis. is not necessary for this Court to pass that the name of the petitioner, as nd in the appointment order, shall be n, the M.C.C. stands disposed off. Sdi- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^ira<fl«i^<ty,"ii<?i<i,Tra^R*ricT—ps/140—2/2011—i,50,ooo. +