M¢$¢ Cr.M.P. No. .Li$..../2010 (S.B.) PETITIONER : APPLI CANT Daneshwar Prasad Sharma S/o Shri Niranjan Sharma, Aged about : 31 years, R/o Gram Ghughwa, Police Station Bhilai—B, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1) 2) ‘ Sinate' semi. Tahsil Patan, State of Chhattisgarh Through : Sacretary for Home Department (Secretariat) D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Superintendent of Police Durg, District Durg (C.G.) Station House Officer, Police Station Utai, District Durg(C.G.) Yoovraj Singh Bisen S/o Not Known Assistant Sub Inspector, Police Station Utai, District ,, Durg (C.G.) Toman Singh S/o Tal Singh aged about 66 years, R/o Pahandor) Police Station Utai, District Durg (C.G.) Kanhaiya tLal Verma S/o Late Bhunu Verma aged about 50 years, R/o Pahandor, Police Station Utai, District Durg (C.G.} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR § %W;\po w “ w " 3) 4) 6) 8) 10) 11) Sardar Shabbir Khan S/o Mohd. Basir Khan, Aged about 4O years, R/o Ghughwa Bhilai— 3, Police Station Bhilai 3, District Durg (C.G.) Moulana Saiyad Jafar Ali S/o Saiyad Jafar A11 aged about 46 years, R/o Near Jahaj Building Vishwakarma Bhawan Ramnagar, Supela Bhilai District Durg (C.G.) Smt. Sarika Jain W/o Amit Jain aged about 34 years, R/o Shanti Nagar, Near Jain Mandir Kohka Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) Kumar Singh S/o R.D. Singh aged about 43 years, R/o 18—A— , Street~22 SectorQ, Bhilai, District Durg (CG) Rakesh Jain S/o Late S.M.Jain aged about 45 years, R/o E.W.S.323, Vaishali Nagar Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) ’"Santosh Singh S/o R.N. Singh 12) aged about 48 years, R/o Ashish Nagar Rishali Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) Banau S/o Hiralal aged about 13) 66 years, R/o Pahandor, Police Station Utai, District Durg (0G) Z? W ® 14) Rekhram Verma S/o Raja Ram Verma, aged about 41 years, R/o Pahndor) Police Station Utai, District Durg (C.G.) (Respondents No.4 to 14 are accused persons) PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 6giCODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE HIGH COURT $F CHEATTXSGARE AT BILAS?”£§R SB : HGN’&LE MR. JEE$TICE ?RITE§V§£ER QIWAKER $11M}. 1\¥o.159 i2$3é0 AWELLANT D hangs hwar Prasad Shanna Vél‘SuS RESPONDENTS Sta’m of QG. 6L Others Shri Abhay Tiwari, counse} for the appeHamt. Shn' Pankaj Shn'vascav‘a, P.L.,for the State. PETITKIH UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CR.P.C. GRBER {09.03.2010} Heard on admission. The’ presant petition has baan £3366. by the petitioner «praying that directions may bs issued to the State Government, the concerned SP. 5.3 Station House Ofiicer for the registration of the case agains‘t the real cu1p1its for which the learned Judicial Magistrate has ajready passed the order on 8.2. 10. 1n the petition several allegations have been made by the petifioner against the poiice offlcers includmg the allegation that some of the ofiicers are demanding bribe for the registration of the case. Though the allegations have been made in the petition but merely on the basis of such allegations no presumption can ‘ne raiseri against the poiice officers. The documents as filed by the petitioner shows that on 8.2.2010 the learned Magistrate has directed the concerned poiice station to mvestigate the matter and then to take apnropriate action. Learned Magistrate has passed the order on 8.2.10 whereas the petitioner has rushed to this Court on 2.3.20 10. This Court is of the opinion that the petitioner has approached this Court in a haste even without waiting for sufficient time. The petition is pie—mature and. therefore cannot be entertained. at this stage. The same is iiabie to "be and is hereby dismissed. i 37 it i$ however €xpected. from the State authoxitias paxiicularly th€ Superintendant 0f Pok'cs to 100k im‘o the matter and to act in accordance with 1aw. //V