IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13720 of 2010 RAMESHWAR RAM, aged 61 years, son of Late Mandrika Ram, resident of Village Kirhindi, P.S. Sheosagar, District Rohtas. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Water Resources Department, Sinchai Bhawan, Patna. 2. The Director, Provident Fund Directorate, Bihar, Pant Bhawan, Patna. 3. The District Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram. 4. The Chief Engineer, Mechanical, Water Resources Deptt., Old Secretariat, Barrack, Patna. 5. The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Mechanical Circle, Gaya, Camp Dehri. 6. The Executive Engineer, Irrigation, Mechanical Division, Dehri, District Rohtas. 7. The Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Path, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 25.8.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State. The grievance of the petitioner is that while fixing his pension in the revised pay scale, the Accountant General as per letter dated 16.4.2009 (Annexure 3) has sent back the proposal of pension of the petitioner to the Executive Engineer, Irrigation, Mechanical Division, Dehri, District Rohtas (respondent no.6) for again sending it back with the sanction of the State Government. It is submitted that as of now, the State Government has sanctioned for payment of - 2 - pension as per the revised pay scale. As such, respondent no.6 now should send back the proposal of pension of the petitioner to the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna (respondent no.7), so that the pension payment order be issued on the revised pay scale. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that although the petitioner has been paid the provident fund, but the amount is not correct. The learned counsel of the State submits that the aforesaid grievances of the petitioner shall be considered as per law. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Executive Engineer, Irrigation, Mechanical Division, Dehri, District Rohtas (respondent no.6), with a copy to the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna (respondent no.7). The petitioner also proposes to file a separate representation before the District Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram (respondent no.3) with respect to the provident fund dues. In case such separate representations are filed stating the details of his respective grievances as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of - 3 - such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled at the earliest and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)