IN THE HIGH COURT OP KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 14” DAY OF JULY, 2011 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR CCC NO.2004/2011 AND Bexveen: 1. Shri. Hanamappa S/a. Irappa Naik, Age: 58 years. 0cc: Agriculture. 2. Sri. Mukkanna S/a. Irappa Naik, Age: 52 years, 0cc: Agriculturc. 3. Sri. Ravappa (ii Rarnanna S/a. Irappa Naik, Age: 42 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 4. Sri. Solabavva So. AcIrushava Mathapati, Since deceased by his LRs. 4.A) Shivayva S/a. Solahavva Matapati, Age: 35 :ears, 0cc: Agriculture. 4.B) Irayva Sio. Solabayya Malapali, Age: 35 years, 0cc: Agriculture. -2- 4.C) Smt. Rekhabai W/o. Holabasaya Ullagaddi. Age: 32 years, 0cc: Household. 4.D) Smt. Shantabai W/o. Solabayya Matapati, Age: 63 years, 0cc: Household. 5. Sri. Bommayya 5/0. Adrushayya Mathapati, Age: 69 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 6. Sri. Veerayya Sb. Adrushayya Mathapati, Age: 56 years, 0cc: Agriculturc. 7. Rangawwa Sb. Rangappa Kenchannavar, Age: 62 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 8. Bharamappa Sb. Ramappa Kenchannavar, Age: 67 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 9. Yellappa Sb. Rams ppa Kenchannavar, Age: 62 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 10. Smt. Renawwa Pandappa Ken chan n ava r, Age: 37 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 11. Ramappa Sb. Pandappa Kenchannavar, Age: 21 years, 0cc: Agriculture. -3- 12. Dyavappa 8/0. Ramappa Kenehannavar, Age: 45 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 13. Sri. Arod Sb. Lakshmappa Kenchannavar, Age: 33 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 14. Madevappa S/o. Lakshmappa Kenehannavar, Age: 25 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 15. Sri. Honnappa S/o. Ningappa Hadapad, Age: 62 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 16. Sri. Mallappa S/n. Ningappa Hadapad, Age: 25 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 17. Smt. Rukmavva W/o. Bharamappa Horakeri, Age: 57 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 18. Tippanna Bharamappa Horakeri, Age: 39 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 19. Smt. Yallawwa W/o. Yamanappa Naik, Age: 32 years, 0cc: Household. 20. Siddappa Bharamappa Horakeri, Age: 29 years, 0cc: Agriculture. -4- 21. Dhasarath Bharamappa Horakeri, Age: 26 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 22. Bharamappa Bhimappa Shirur, Age: 64 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 23. Smt. Balavva W/o. Yankappa Shirur, Age: 57 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 24. Maningappa Bhimappa Shirur, Since deceased By his Lrs. 24.A) Smt. Ramavva W/o. Kamanna Shirur, Age: 27 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 24.B) Dhasarath Kamanna Shirur, Age: 27 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 25. Somappa Sannappa Kurahatti, Since deceased By his LRs. 25.A) Smt. Hanamavva W/o. Somappa Kurahatti, Age: 57 years, 0cc: Household. 25.B) Arad Somappa Kurahatii, Age: 37 years, 0cc: Agriculture. 1’ All are R/ o. Simikeri Village, Tq: Bagalkot, Dist: Bagalkot. (By Sri. Jagadish Patil, Advocate) r d: Complainant. D. Shanmukh, The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Upper krishna Project. N a v a n a g a r, Bagaikot. (By Sri. N Dincsh Rao, G.A) These CCC is filed under Sect ion the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, R/w. Constitution of India, praying tO con t e rn n e r / a c c u s e d to d i so hey i n g t W.P,No.466 1/2008 dated 30/07 AnnexurcA. Hence, kindly pass accordance with law and such other passed in favour of the complainant as proper in facts and circumstance of the Accused. 11 and 12 of Article 215 of punish the he order in /2009 i.e., an order in order be also deemed fit and case. These petition s coming on for orders this day, N.lKurnar. 3., made the following: ORDER This complaint is filed complaining of disobedience of the order dated 30/07/2009 wherein 2 respondent was directed to pass a ppropriate award in respect of the properties in question after upholding L. opporinitv to the petitioners to substantiate their claims. The Land Acquisition Officer was also directed to hold enquiry under Section 1 1 of the Act. Complaining of disobedience of the order this petition is filed. 2. Today a counter affidavit is filed by Sri.Shanmukha D., So. H.D.Naik. Special Land Acquisition Officer, Upper Krishna Project, Bagalkot. Wherein along with thc counter he has produced the copies of the notices which were served on the petitioners. the objections they have filed to the said notice and also the recommendation he has made for passing of the award. He submits that within a span of two months the axvarcl should be finalized. .3. In that view of the matter the petition do not survives for consideration. Accordingly the petition is rejected. Sd/ JUDGE Mrk/ct: dk Sd/ JUDGE