HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY W.P.No.4710 of 2004 Between: A.P. Yogadhyayana Parishad, Dharmakaran Road, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. ……….Petitioner and The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Hyderabad and two others. ………..Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY W.P.No.4710 of 2004 ORDER: The main grievance of the petitioner-Society is that even though it made a representation dated 11-06-2003, requesting the respondents 1 and 2 to take necessary steps for demolition of the structures constructed by respondent No.3 in the premises No.7-1-78/1/B (583) in street No.10, Dharmakaran Road, Ameerpet, Hyderabad, by digging the cellar and without maintaining setbacks, and which is in deviation of the sanctioned plan, they have neither considered the representation and pass appropriate orders thereon, nor taken any steps for demolition of illegal constructions. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking appropriate directions. Though the writ petition is of the year 2004, no counter affidavit is filed by any of the respondents. In spite of service of notice, none appeared for the respondent No.3 nor was made any representation on his behalf. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned standing counsel for the Municipal Corporation, appearing for R-1 and R-2, and perused the material placed on record. The question as to whether the constructions made by 3rd respondent are in deviation of the sanctioned plan or not, is the matter to be considered by the competent authority. When it is brought to the notice of the 1st respondent-Commissioner about the illegal constructions made by the 3rd respondent, it is for him to look into the matter and take necessary steps in accordance with law. As much as no counter affidavit is filed by any of the respondents and in view of the allegations made by the petitioner-Society in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: Respondents 1 and 2 are directed to consider the representation dated 11-06-2003 said to have been made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with Law, after issuing notice to the 3rd respondent. If any constructions are found to have been made in deviation of the sanctioned plan, the respondents 1 and 2 shall take necessary steps for demolition of the illegal constructions made by the 3rd respondent. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ 3rd August 2009 KVR