IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 27TH MAY 2010 / 6TH JYAISHTA 1932 RP.No. 222 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.15714/2009 Dated 08/12/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS 1 & 2: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE GENERAL EDUCATION DIRECTOR, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,(TEXT BOOK DIVISION), PADMA VILASAM, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE TEXT BOOK OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE TEXT BOOK OFFICER, PADMA VILASAM, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.M.MANOJ RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER & 3RD RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SRI.P.S.RAJAN,PROPRIETOR,KERALA WASTE PAPER STORES, PARAKKAVETTY BUILDINGS, CHANGANASSERY. 2. SRI.D.SOMAN, VINAYAKA TRADERS, ERUVA PO, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ---------------------------- R.P.No.222 of 2010 in W.P.(C)No.15714 of 2009 ---------------------------- Dated 27th May, 2010 ORDER Heard Sri.P.N.Manoj, learned Government Pleader and Sri.P.Santhosh Kumar, learned counsel for the writ petitioner. On going through the pleadings and after hearing the submissions made at the Bar by the learned counsel on either side, I am not satisfied that adequate grounds have been made out warranting review of the judgment delivered on 8.12.2009. Clauses 1 and 9 of Ext.P1 tender notice do not in my opinion support the stand taken by the review petitioners. The review petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. P.N.RAVINDRAN Judge TKS