HIGH COURT OF CHI-IATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ‘vVrit Petition (S) N0. 172 012008 pETITIONERS Emil Tirkey, Age about 44 year, Asstt. Teacher, S/o Shri Josheph Tirkey Govt. Middle School, Sirimkela, Duldula Block-Duldula, Distt. Jashpur (CG). 2. Melyor Tilkey, Age about 43 year, Asstt. Teacher, S/o Shri Bamabas Tilkey Govt. Middle School, Sirimkela, Duldula Block, Duldula, Dish. Jashpur (CG). VERSUS . State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Tribal Welfare Department & Education Depaxtmcnt DKS Bhawan, Distt. Raipur (CG). 2. District Etlucation Officer Jashpur, Disii.—Jashpur (CG). 3. Block Education Officer Duldula, Distt,-Jashpur (CG). 4. Treasury, Account & Pension Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: gongile Mr. Satlsh K. Agiihotljg J.) : Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Present Shn' Awind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents, RESPONDENTS ORAL ORDER (Passed on 10‘“ orJanumy, 2003) i... The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or &om the date of completion ofprobation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and. question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same as to that of in W.P.(S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others Vs. State Government of Chhattisgm‘h & Others), which was allowed vide order dated O7. 1 1 .2006. 3. In View ofthe above-stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihoti Judge . r‘