IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No.29 of 2009 Ramesh Singh & two others ...Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand & fourteen others ...Respondents Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Coram: Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. V.K. Gupta, C.J. (Oral) This petition is not maintainable at all because the reliefs claimed in the writ petition do not fall within the jurisdiction of this Court exercisable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. (V.K.Bist, J.) (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 27.03.2009 Arti