IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR Pursis stamp 13151/2010 Company Petition no.6/2003 [Mohanlal Parmar..vs..M/s Paramount] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or judges Orders. CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE: 16 /12 / 2010 For the reasons stated in the pursis the appearance of the learned counsel for the petitioner in this company petition stands discharged. Since it was stated on behalf of the respondent – company that the respondent company does not have any assets remaining with them and they have no objection to the winding of the company, this court asked the petitioner firm / company to deposit the amount of Rs. 20,000/- towards the necessary charges for issuance of the advertisement and for following the procedure for the winding up of the company. Though the time was granted to the petitioner, to deposit the amount, the amount was not deposited. The pursis was thereafter filed by the counsel for the petitioner stating therein that the petitioners failed to give any instructions to the counsel for the petitioner in regard to the petition and the order passed by this court. In the aforesaid circumstances, the petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE SMP.