IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28900 of 2010 DEEPAK KUMAR YADAV @ DEEPAK KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 4.10.2010. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking modification in the condition as set out in the order dated 28.6.2010 passed in Cr.Misc.No.21499 of 2010 whereby this court had granted bail to the petitioner subject to the condition that the father of the petitioner would stand as one of the bailors. Learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to the statement made in para-3 of the present application and the First Information Report, submits that the father of the petitioner had already expired and which relevant fact could not be brought to the notice of this court at the stage of passing of the order dated 28.6.2010. He further submits that due to inadvertence, this mistake also occurred in the cause title of the application. He submits that by reason of the condition set out in the said order, the petitioner has not 2 been released and thus, the condition stipulated in the order dated 28.6.2010 be appropriately modified. Having considered the First Information Report and the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the condition stipulated in the order dated 28.6.2010 passed in Cr.Misc.No.21499 of 2010 requiring the father of the petitioner to stand as one of the bailors is accordingly modified to read that the father-in-law of the petitioner Chhotelal who has sworn the affidavit at the stage of filing the bail application as also at the present stage, would stand as one of the bailors and who would be under a duty to inform the court below in case this petitioner is named or is found involved in any further case of similar nature after his release in this case and whereupon the court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and take him into custody. The order dated 28.6.2010 passed in Cr.Misc.No.21499 of 2010 is accordingly modified to the extent stated above. With the aforesaid observation/direction, this application stands 3 disposed of. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned by Fax at the cost of the petitioner. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J)