IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1844 of 2009 Sharfe Alam son of late Md. Hanif @ Bhuttu R/o village Maina Rahik PS. Maigachi, Dist. Darbhanga…..Petitioner Versus 1. Qudrat Khatoon daughter of Md. Abdul Quam (Ex wife of Sharfe Alam-Divorcee) 2. Sayesta (Minor) daughter of Sharfe Alam, both resident of Village Ram NagarP.s. Bahera, Dist. Darbhanga ….O. Ps ------------------- 3 14.12.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the provision of law at page one. The husband petitioner has preferred this revision application under section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against the judgment and order dated 4.5.2009 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court in Maintenance Case No. 12 of 2007 by which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs. 500/- to his wife and Rs. 500/- to his daughter per month for their maintenance. Main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is unable to pay the amount of maintenance as he has no sufficient means to pay the amount of maintenance. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the impugned judgment it appears that the learned Principal Judge has considered the evidence adduced on behalf of both the parties and has found that petitioner has also married another lady and he has children from the second wife. After considering the evidence the learned Principal Judge has found that the petitioner has sufficient means to pay the amount of maintenance whereas his wife and a minor daughter 2 have no means to maintain themselves. The amount of maintenance is also meagre. I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. M.Rahman (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)