IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 6979 of 2010 Date of Decision: 21.4.2010 Manoj Attri ....Petitioner. Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider his case and allot him a plot measuring 14 marlas under the oustees policy. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made a representation dated 24.11.2008 (Annexure P- 14) to the respondents for the same relief as claimed in this writ petition but no action has been taken thereon so far and he shall feel satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.1 to decide the same in a given time frame. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the file, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to decide the representation (Annexure P-14) sent by the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order by passing a speaking order and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. April 21, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE