IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.630 of 2010 1. SWETAMBER JHA S/O LATE DIGAMBER JHA R/O VILL- KOILAKH, P.S RAJ NAGAR, DISTT- MADHUBANI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. KUMAR RAVI S/O FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SUPAUL 3. SRI DILIP KUMAR JHA FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN THE PETITIONER/SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER NIRMALI, SUPAUL 4. RASHID KALIM ANSARI FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER NIRMALI, DISTT- SUPAUL 5. SRI BIJAY KUMAR FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER PRATAPGANJ, DISTT- SUPAUL ----------- 02. 17.03.2011 In compliance of the orders of this Court, opposite party no.5 has paid the arrears of salary as also subsistence allowance to the petitioner but petitioner is not satisfied with the quantum of the amount released. Let the authority indicate by passing another order the calculation on the basis of which payments have been made to the petitioner. From the show cause it also appears that the enquiry report has been submitted. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to proceed any further with the contempt application, which is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)