lN 11 IL I 11011 COI7RT OF KARNATAIKA CIRCLIl BENCh Al l)H:\R\VAI) l):\ll1)IIIISlIIL Il)AYlOCll3lR2uil rr i liii: i l( )lll MR .iLS I lCl \NANI) I3YRARLI)l)Y C’R.I\iIN.:\IAPPhZAL No.7582006 BFl\VLF: SurcNh S o.I Iarnar.idd\ a II eiiiareddv S( maredd \e: 42 ears. ()cc:AricuIiure. Ro,Koppal ....:\PPL:\I I:\Nl (flu Shri Ramachandra Mali, Advocate.) Suresh So.Thimmappa Somareddy Age: Major. 0cc: Agriculture. Rio. I alakal, I q: i elburga. 1)ist: Koppal. .RLSPONDINF (13v Shri S.A \Vajid and A.G,Ballolli, Advocates.) lii is Crini nal Appeal is tiled under Section 378 of the Code 01 Criminal Procedure seeking to set aside the judgment and order dated o l :tcrlu i tot I dated 4.2 20t )0 in C ,C ,No,84 2005 on the file of the iMiC. Koppat. acquiltinu the respondenaccucd hr the of Ince pun ishihie under Section 138 il Nenotiahie liitrumcnR \ct. I 5$ I Ii i appeal eomne on for OnnI hearine thiN Jn . the ( onrt delivercd the me; JtJI)(1FNT 1 lctid thc learned e unset ir the appellant. ( )n the face of it. ii is made ut that there was no connection between the cheque issued and the account, in which it as issued. ith the accused. It is on this prel i mi nary around that the complaint has been d iin issed I houah the learned counsel lr the appellant akes an endeavour lo contend olher\\ ise. this aspect of the matter has been tound as a thct, I heretbre, there is no scope for interfrencc. the present appeal is dismissed. sdf JUDGE Mrk/