R.S.A. No. 3207 of 2007 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A. No. 3207 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision : 24.3.2009 Bal Kishan .......... Appellant Versus Hari Kishan & others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present : Mr. Arun Palli, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Kunal Malwani, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. J.K. Bhatti, Advocate for Mr. J.L. Malhota, Advocate for respondents No. 2, 3 & 4. **** VINOD K. SHARMA, J. (ORAL) This regular second appeal is directed against the judgments and decree dated 31.1.2007 and 21.8.2007 passed by the learned Courts below vide which suit filed by the plaintiff for permanent injunction restraining the defendant / respondent from interfering in peaceful possession of the plaintiff / appellant has been ordered to be dismissed. The plaintiff sought a decree of permanent injunction on the plea that the plaintiff was entitled to inherit the property in equal share being legal heir of Jamna Devi, the true owner of the property. However, it may be mentioned here that his claim of inheritance stands rejected by the R.S.A. No. 3207 of 2007 2 learned Courts below and the said finding has been affirmed by this Court in RSA No. 3124 of 2007 titled Bal Krishan Vs. Hari Kishan and others. Once the plaintiff / appellant failed to prove his case and it was held that the property in dispute stood bequeathed to defendant / respondents, the learned Courts below rightly held that plaintiff / appellant was not entitled to injunction. It may be noticed that the defendants are seeking possession by adopting due process of law as the suit for possession has been filed by revoking the licence of the plaintiff. The appeal raises no substantial question of law for consideration by this Court in view of the decision of this Court in RSA No. 3124 of 2007 titled Bal Krishan Vs. Hari Kishan and others, decided on 24.3.1990. No merit. Dismissed. 24.3.2009 ( VINOD K. SHARMA ) 'sp' JUDGE