c^ ilMGLE SK'IM ^^°;.^$0^ ® %.w ?.^.' ?^' ^o.- .4^ ^^ <.„.. b • \^d ^®°-°" IN THE HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No.^3G /2009 PETITIONER /" Chandan Manker aged about 26 years, S/o Bal Krishna Manker, R/o Ekta Nagar, Sector-2, House No. 14, Gudiyapara, Raipur f RESPONDENTS yl. / 2. 3. VERSUS The State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary its Secretary Tribal welfare Department, D.K. S. Bhawan, Raipur High Level Caste Scrutiny Committee, through its President, Pt. Deendayal Upadhyay Nagar, Sector-4, Raipur Secretary/Ministry ofHome Department D.K. S. Bhawan, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I- N0,1353, W..2009 Petitioner Versus Respondlents Chandan ManRer The State of Chhattisgarh & Others PETITiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTSON OF iNDiA (SB: Mf, K. J.) •Presentj- Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri.Sushi! Dubey, Govt. Advocate and Shri Ajit Singh, Pane! Lawyer for the State. . on 17th day of February, 2011) 1,, 2. 3. 'l l Heard learned counsel for the parties. On 7-2-2011 on the request of iearned counsel appearing for the State one week time was granted to seek instruotions and to flie an affldavit to the effect asto why the matler.may not be disposed of in the iight of the decision of this Court in Dinesh Kumar Biiagorla v. -State of Ciihattisgarii & Othes^ and other connected matters. Today, ieam.ed counsel appearing for'the State submits that the may be declded in terms of the decision of this Court in Dinesh Kumar Bhagonaisupm). Learned counsel further submits that the respondent Ho:2 vvould consider and declde the dispute pendlng before the authorities withjn a period of six weeks. In this respect, the petltioner is permitted to file other relevant documents, jf so advlsed, within a period of one week from today. 'Accordingly, the respondent No.2 is directed to examine the case of the petitioner in the ilght of'the declsion of this Court in Dinesh Kumar Bhagona (supra) and pass an appropriate order, in accordance witti iavv, as early as possibie, preferably withln a period of six weeks from today. in view of foregoing, the writ petifion is disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- I Satish K.Agnihotri l Judge WP (Si No.3338 of 2007 (decldect on 19-8-2010) | ,:- ••.. 4. 5.