1 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6911 OF 2009 Khashaba Ganpati Thorat ...Petitioner vs. Smt.Chhaya Bhimrao Thorat and others ...Respondents Mr.Nitin Deshpande for the petitioner Mr.Ravanware D.D. For respondent no.1 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : MAY 3, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is the first defendant in the suit for partition filed by the first respondent. The first respondent is the widow of one Bhimrao who was the brother of the first respondent. The first respondent claimed partition of 1/6th share in the suit properties which are agricultural lands and house properties, By the impugned order, the petitioner has been directed to pay maintenance of Rs.2000/- per month to the first respondent-widow till the disposal of the suit for partition. 2 After having heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I find no case for interference is made out. The suit relates to partition of the valuable properties which are agricultural lands and house properties which are allegedly in possession of the petitioner. Therefore, the maintenance amount of Rs. 2000/- per month fixed by the trial Court in favour of 2 the first respondent-widow is reasonable. No case for interference is made out. Writ Petition is rejected. Hearing of the suit is expedited. JUDGE