IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9811 of 2011 DEEPAK SHARMA @ DIPAK SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 341, 323, 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that initially the divorce case was filed by the complainant which was subsequently transferred to the Lok Adalat and at the instance of the complainant again retransferred to the family court from where the initial application for divorce was withdrawn and after withdrawal of the said divorce case, the present complaint case has been filed. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a 2 period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 1895 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Siwan, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. If the complainant wants to resume the conjugal life then the petitioner has no objection. If the complainant will file an application before the learned court below for resumption of conjugal life then the learned court below will issue notice to the petitioner and the petitioner will take back the complainant to her matrimonial home to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)