SCA/9219/2008 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9219 of 2008 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= RATILAL KHIMJIBHAI PARMAR - Petitioner(s) Versus DISTRICT COLLECTOR & 1 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR PH PATHAK for Petitioner(s) : 1, MR SUNIT SHAH, GP, WITH MS NISHA PARIKH, AGP for Respondent(s) : 1, MR SANJAY M AMIN for Respondent(s) : 2, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER Date : 01/08/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT After the order dated 29.7.2008, the respondent No.1 – Collector, Gandhinagar has filed affidavit and explained the situation and circumstances which caused delay in executing the recovery certificate. SCA/9219/2008 2/2 JUDGMENT It is also given out that the recovery certificate has been executed and the amount in question has been paid over to the petitioner workman. Mr. Pathak has admitted that the payment has been made and nothing survives in the petition so far as the petitioner is concerned. Mr. Amin for the respondent No.2 has also said that the amount in question has been paid. Since the recovery certificate has been executed and directions are complied with, the respondent No.1 is relieved from his obligation. The explanation given by the respondent No.1 for causing delay is accepted. Since payments have been made and the petitioner's grievance does not survive, Mr. Pathak prays that the petition may be disposed of. A copy of the voucher under which the payment has been made and the petitioner has acknowledged the payment, is to be taken on record. In view of the aforesaid, present petition is disposed of. Notice discharged. No order as to costs. Kdc [K.M.Thaker, J.]