IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50879 of 2008 1. RAGHUNANDAN YADAV, S/o Sukal Yadav 2. Rama Yadav, son of Sukal Yadav 3. Laxman Yadav son of Sukal Yadav 4. Kailu Yadav @ Kailash Yadav son of Raghunandan Yadav 5. Nanhku Yadav son of Raghunandan Yadav, All are residents of Laukha, P.S. Supaul, District-Supaul. …………………………………………Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 03.03.2009 F.I.R. was instituted against all the petitioners u/S 307 & other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code. All other sections except 307 of the Indian Penal Code are bailable. After investigation, charge sheet was submitted by the police under the bailable sections. All petitioners were on police bail. However, cognizance was taken u/S 307 of the Indian Penal Code, as such, petitioners had apprehension that they may be arrested. They filed anticipatory bail before the Sessions Judge which was rejected being not maintainable. However, the petitioners could have surrendered before the concerned court for grant of regular bail. In case, the petitioners surrender before the concerned court, their cases be considered in the light of decision reported in 2004(3) PLJR 491. Anticipatory bail application of the petitioners is not maintainable. They should surrender so that their cases can be considered by the concerned court in 2 accordance with law in the light of reported decision. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. AKV/ ( Mridula Mishra, J )