IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2007 / 29TH SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 14606 of 2005(L) ------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20/11/2004 IN I.A.2623/04 IN IA.1751/02 IN I.P.7/2002 of PRL.SUB COURT, KOTTAYAM .................... PETITIONER: ------------ C.G.GEORGE, SHAREHOLDER, PRAKASH PLANTATIONS PRIVATE LTD. CHALUMTHALAKAL HOUSE, THOTTAKKADU KARA, PUTHUPPALLY VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SENIOR) SRI.S.SUJIN. RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. VARGHESE DANIEL, PALLIKUNNEL HOUSE, THOTTACKAD KARA, PUTHUPPALLY VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. MANI THOMAS, PULLOLICKAL KADUMPIL HOUSE, THOTTACKAD KARA, PUTHUPPALLY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT (DIED). *ADDL. 3. ASWATHI MANI, W/O.LATE MANI THOMAS, PULLOLICKAL KADUMPIL HOUSE, THOTTACKAD KARA, PUTHUPPALLY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. LEGAL HEIR OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT IS IMPLEADED AS ADDL. 3RD RESPONDENT AS PER ORDER DATED 20.8.2007 IN I.A.8862/06 R1 BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR FINAL HEARING ON 17/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. .......................................................... W.P.(C)No.14606 OF 2005 ........................................................... DATED THIS THE 20th AUGUST, 2007 J U D G M E N T No representation for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the 1st respondent submits that the order impugned in the Writ Petition is the proceedings of the court below on 20.11.2004 directing issuance of notice to all the respondents in the I.A. which is Ext.P2. I find some merit in the above submission. However, in the absence of the petitioner, the Writ Petition will stand dismissed only for default. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) tgl WP(C)N0. -2-