43# $- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2121/2011 RAM CI-IANDER SHARMA & ORS. Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohit Gupta, Advocate for Petitioner Nos. 1 to 4 with Petitioner Nos. 1 to 4 in person. Ms. Mukta Shanna, Advocate for Petitioner Nos. 5 and 6 with Petitioner Nos. 5 and 6 in person. versus STATE Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State with SI Saroj Bala, PS Defence Colony. COl^M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER % 12.07.2011 Crl. M.A. No. 7706/2011 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. M.C. No. 2121/2011 & Crl. M.A. No. 7707/2011 (Stay) By this petitionthe Petitionersseek quashingof the FIR No. 317/2002 under Sections 452/354/324/34 IPC registered at PS Defence Colony, New Delhi andthe proceedingspursuanttheretoon the basis that the partieshave entered into a compromise. The Complainant/PetitionerNo. 5 Mrs. Kavita Sharma is present in CRL.M.C. 2121/2011 Page 1 of 3 Signing Date:31.08.2024 17:26:12 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified n Court and states that with the intervention of the common friends the matter has been settled between the parties and she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. The Petitioner No. 6 SM Suresh Sharma who was the injured victim in the FIR and had received simple injuries is also present, who also states that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties he does not want to prosecute the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. The abovementioned FIR was registered on the complaint of Petitioner No. 5 wherein she inter alia alleged that the Petitioner Nos. 1 to 4 suddenly entered her house as there was a dispute for past some time in the families and started abusing her brother-in-law, that is. Petitioner No. 6. Thereafterthey assaulted her and her brother in law with sharp object. The injuries were opined to be simple in nature. As the parties are distantly relative, with the intervention of the common friends they have entered into a settlement. Sincethe partieshave enteredinto a settlementand amicablyresolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in CRL.M.C. 2121/2011 Page 2 of 3 the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently,FIR No. 317/2002 under Sections 452/354/324/34IPG registered at PS Defence Colony, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Petitioner Nos. 1, 2, 5 and 6,. who are identified by their respective counsels, have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petitionandthependingapplicationare disposedof Orderdasti. MUKTA GUPTA, J. JULY 12,2011 i/^ ^ /Kc\V1 Ip- 1/ r P 4 . f 1 2- . . 11,0 Page 3 of3