IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application (C482) No. 1006 of 2011 Anil Sharma S/o Shri Anand Swaroop Sharma, R/o Gujaratyan Street Dhampur, District-Bijnore, U.P. ….…..Petitioner Versus 1- State of Uttarakhand through Secretary, Home, Government of Uttarakhand, Dehradun. 2- Shri Rameshwar Prasad Dimri, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rudraprayag, District Rudraprayag. ……Respondents Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Adhikari, A.G.A., present for the State. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. 2) By means of this petition, moved under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioners have sought quashing of proceedings of Criminal Case No. 314 of 2011, State Vs. Dinesh Lal Verma and others, relating to offences punishable under Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Rudraprayag. 3) It is submitted that petitioner Anil Sharma is an Advocate. It is further pleaded that he has no role in commission of crime. However, after investigation charge sheet has been filed against the accused including the petitioner with the finding that they prepared the forged orders 2 of the court showing co-accused Dinesh Lal Verma discharged from three criminal proceedings. From the papers on record, it appears that co-accused Dinesh Lal Verma was a Sub-Inspector, who was facing three criminal trials in district Bijnore of Uttar Pradesh. It appears that when his departmental promotion got held up, forged papers were prepared and submitted to departmental authority showing that co-accused Dinesh Lal Verma has been acquitted/discharged by the court. In fact Dinesh Lal Verma had neither been discharged nor acquitted by the court at District –Bijnore. Finding of investigation is that forged papers were got to prepared in connivance of the Advocate (present petitioner). 4) Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and after going through the papers on record, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the trial of the case, the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is dismissed summarily. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 04.11.2011 JM