IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 3904 of 2007 Suresh Chhikara and others ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents Present: Ms. Alka Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG, Haryana for the State. RANJIT SINGH J. When this application for disposing of the main petition which is admitted, is taken up for hearing, State counsel has placed before the Court communication dated 03.09.2010 reading that the department has decided to promote the petitioners and their case has been called by the concerned DEEO. It is further stated that the petitioners' case would be considered and they would be promoted if otherwise eligible. Since the relief claimed in the writ petition has been granted, the writ petition is disposed as having been rendered infructuous. Counsel for the petitioners at this stage points out that their claim for promotion is required to be considered from the date their juniors were so promoted. This is so ordered in Annexure A-1 on which reliance has been placed while seeking disposal of the present writ petition being a covered case. The petitioners would be at liberty to represent in case their claim for promotion is not granted in terms of order Annexure A-1. September 06, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE