IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 22616 of 2010 Date of decision : 28.02.2011 Shameem Khan Chaudhary and another ...Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Rajesh K. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Palwinder Singh, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and 6. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) The main grievance emanating from the record is that although, the petitioners moved representation (Annexure P-1) and legal notice (Annexure P-2) but no action has yet been taken by respondent No.4. 2. The main contesting party Gram Panchayat did not turn up to contest the prayer of the petitioners. 3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.4, to decide the representation (Annexure P-1) and legal notice (Annexure P-2) and to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. February 28, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge