HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI W.P.No.22033 of 2001 03-06-2010 Between: D.P.Narayana and others. ………Petitioners And The Govt. of A.P. rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. ………Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI W.P.No.22033 of 2001 ORDER: The petitioners are said to be the flat owners and residents of Poornima Sriram Towers, Chandanagar, Hyderabad. They have filed this writ petition complaining that the 4th respondent who is the builder of the complex made constructions over and above the 5th floor in violation of the building construction permission and in violation of Section 6 of the A.P. Apartment Act, 1987. They allege that despite the construction over and above the 5th floor and some constructions in the cellar portion of the building, the 2nd respondent has not taken appropriate steps to remove the illegal constructions. 2. The 2nd respondent has filed counter, in which, it is admitted that two temporary rooms in the cellar portion have been constructed on the area which is meant for parking. The construction of these rooms is in violation of condition No.7 of the permission and the sanctioned plan. It is also admitted that these constructions are causing inconvenience for the parking of the vehicles. The respondent No.2 also stated that after the receipt of representation from the petitioners, some officials visited the premises and stopped further construction including installation of cell tower, which is alleged to have been constructed by Tata Tele Services. 3. The petitioners have not filed rejoinder denying the statement that any such cell tower has actually been erected. 4. Having regard to the statement of respondent No.2 with reference to the illegal constructions in the cellar portion of the premises, it is enjoined upon the 2nd respondent to take such measures as per law to remove them to bring the construction in consonance with the permission and the sanctioned plan. The 2nd respondent is, therefore, directed to proceed with the removal of unauthorized constructions and remove them as per law. 5. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ 3rd June 2010 kvr