IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6804 of 2009 Between: B.Madhavi W/o.B.Vijaya Kumar R/o.Gopinenipalem Village, Vatsavai Mandal, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Sub-Inspector of Police, Vatsavai Police Station, Jaggaiahpeta Mandal, Krishna Dist. 2 The Circle Inspector of Police, Jaggaiahpeta Mandal, Krishna District. 3 The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nandigama, Krishna District. 4 The Superintendent of Police, Krishna District at Machilipatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.NAGENDRA REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the delay and inaction on the part of the respondents in executing the NBW issued in CC No.170/2008 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Jaggaiahpeta as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondents to execute the NBW issued in CC.No.170/2008 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Jaggaiahpeta forthwith.” At the hearing, Sri P.Nagendra reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate for causing issue of non-bailable warrants to the accused. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP.No.8898 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 4th JUNE, 2009. kvni