... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2072 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2072 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2072 OF 2006 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1669 OF 2006 FIRST APPEAL NO.1669 OF 2006 FIRST APPEAL NO.1669 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri P.N.Sanghavi for the Applicants. Shri C.M.Lokesh for the Respondents. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : JANUARY 10, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 10, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 10, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. My attention has been invited to order dated 27th July, 2006 passed by this court in Civil Application No.3031 of 2002. Ad-interim relief granted earlier was continued by order dated 27th July, 2006 till 15th November, 2006 subject to the Applicants depositing 25% of the total compensation payable under the impugned Judgment and Award within a period of eight weeks from 27th July, 2006. The office noting shows that Stay Writ duly certified received from the Tribunal records that the Applicants have not complied with the said ... 2 ... order of deposit. It is thus obvious that ad-interim relief granted by this court in favour of the Appellants stands vacated. As ad-interim relief stands vacated, this Application will not survive as the Applicants in this Application can always execute the Award. Application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE