THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.22767 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner is a college of education. It is recognized by the 1st respondent, permitted by the 2nd respondent and affiliated to the 5th respondent. The 1st respondent issued a show cause notice dated 04.04.2009 directing the petitioner to explain as to why the recognition accorded to it be not withdrawn for the reasons mentioned therein. The petitioner submitted an explanation. Thereafter, the 1st respondent passed an order dated 25.06.2009 directing withdrawal of recognition. The petitioner challenges the same. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for School Education and the learned counsel for respondents 1,4 and 5. The petitioner has raised several contentions and in fact denied certain factual allegations made against it in the impugned order. This Court would have considered them, but for the fact that a remedy of appeal is provided under Section 18 of the National Council for Teacher Education Act. The appellate authority would be in a better position to deal with the various contentions advanced by the petitioner. The limitation for preferring the appeal had expired. This Court is of the view that the period of limitation can be extended to the petitioner to enable it to prefer the appeal. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the remedy of appeal. It is directed that the appeal shall be received by the appellate authority without raising any objection as to limitation, in case it is presented within four (4) weeks from today. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 23.10.2009 JSU THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.22767 of 2009 Date: 23.10.2009 JSU