IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 15TH MAGHA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 84 of 2009() --------------------------- CMP.2086/2008 of DISTRICT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA CRIME NO.914/08 OF PATHANAMTHITTA POLICE STATION PETITIONER -------------------- RAJEEV, S/O. BHASKARAN, KAVUKANDATHIL HOUSE, VATTIPRAM, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI.VINOY VARGHESE KALLUMOOTTILL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA POLICE STATION. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI.M.S.BREEZE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.HEMA, J. ----------------------------------------- B.A.No. 84 of 2009 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th February, 2009 O R D E R This petition is for anticipatory bail. 2. The crime is registered under Sections 454, 457, 461 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code on the allegation that fixed deposit receipt is missing from the Municipal office. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that police is making enquiries about petitioner and hence, he apprehends arrest. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that petitioner is the suspect in this case and so far he has not been made an accused. He was required for questioning and that is why the police was enquiring about him. 5. On hearing both sides, I do not find any reason to grant anticipatory bail, since petitioner is not apprehending arrest on accusation of having committed a non-bailable BA.84/09 2 offence. However, it is made clear that if petitioner is required for questioning, notice shall be issued to him in accordance with law. Petition is disposed of accordingly. Issue a copy of this order to the Public Prosecutor. K.HEMA, JUDGE vgs.