1 FARAD CONSTITUTION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1159/2004 M/s. Ram Ganesh Gadkari Sahakari Sakar Karkhana Limited, Savner through its Manging Director ...Versus... Office of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Nagpur -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Shri G.C. Singh, Adv. for petitioner) (Shri R.S. Sundaram, Adv. for respondent) CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 31.08.2007. This writ petition is pending since 2004. Advocate Shri G.C. Singh for the petitioner submits that it is only after decision of Writ Petition No.6198/2004 pending before the Division Bench of this Court, the present writ petition should be decided. I do not agree with the submission made by Advocate Shri Singh. Advocate Shri Sundaram for respondent makes a statement that under the impugned order, the Provident Fund Organization has recovered the entire amount. He further states that if the petitioner feels aggrieved, he is 2 always at liberty to file appeal before the Appellate Tribunal. Advocate Shri Singh makes a grievance that he does not have records pertaining to the number of employees or details regarding the employees in respect of whom recovery is said to have been made. It is made clear that it is always open to the petitioner to approach office of the Provident Fund Organization and apply for certified copies thereof. Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE ssw