IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 7463 of 2008 Date of Decision: 8th December, 2010 __________________________________________________________ Raj Kumar ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ….Respondent. ___________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 ___________________________________________________________ For the Petitioner: None. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. Advocate General. __________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, J (oral). The petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No. 8 for the post of Takniki Sahayak. It is alleged that the petitioner has secured 29.79 marks and respondent No. 8 has secured 32.03 marks. The suitability of the petitioner and respondent No. 8 has been adjudged by the duly constituted Selection Committee. Since the suitability of the petitioner and respondent No. 8 has been adjudged by the duly constituted Committee, this Court will not sit over the recommendations 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. 2 made by the Committee. Consequently, there is no merit in this petition, which is accordingly dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 8th, 2010(ms)