1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application No. 25 of 2010 in Contempt Petition No. 100 OF 2008 in Writ Petition No. 2260 of 2001 (D) (Navnath Atmaram Mahajan ..vs.. Dinesh Damodar Gajade and others) =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. V.G.Wankhede, Advocate for the Petitioner, Mr. A.P.Raghute, Advocate for Respondent No.1 with R.No.1 in person None for respondents no.2 and 3. C ORAM : Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota, J. DATED : 16th February, 2010. This civil application is for cancellation of bailable warrant issued against applicant/respondent no.1 on 8th February, 2010. It is stated in the application that in the month of January, 2010, the clerk of the counsel of applicant left the job and on the date the petition was listed for hearing, the counsel was out of town on account of his professional commitments. Therefore, he could not inform the date of hearing to the applicant/respondent. Consequently, on the last date, neither the applicant/respondent no.1, nor his counsel were present in the court. Today, applicant/respondent no.1 is present in person in the Court. 2 Considering the ground made out, the civil application is allowed. The bailable warrant issued against applicant/respondent no.1 is cancelled. The applicant/respondent no.1 is, however, directed to be more diligent in future as regards attendance in the Court. Civil Application is disposed of. List the Contempt Petition on 2nd March, 2010. JUDGE. Diwale