mmw u. E.g:.z.m~...€.r.$.§.l.9§|=[200 anésr m (W) amatwaaiai mmmméw WWW#WW \ ammswm'ai aiwm‘a W. . S No.6185 2008 PETITIONER Dr. S t SG. Pandey, wife of Dr Shri Girish Pandefr,' ag'ed about 57 years; Occupation ‘ - Service, Resident of Rajendra Nagar Chowk, Bilaspur(CG) Versus = RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through: the Secretary, Departmcat of Health and Family Welfam, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) ’2. The Deputy Secretary, Health and Family We Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur x (CG) . 3. The D actor, Health Services, Raipur, District. Raipm (CG) 4. The Commissioner, Health Services, Raipur, Disnict Raipur (CG) ' 5. Dr. Amar Singh Thakur, Civil Surgeon cum ‘ Chief Hospital Superintendent, Sardar Patel District Hospital, Bilaspur, District wBilaspur (CG) ‘ WRIT PETITION UNDER ART! LE 226 OF T E ONSTITUTION 0 IND SB: HON. SHRI DHIRENDRA MISHRA, J 07-11-2008 Shri A.K. Shukla, eoun e1 for the peu'tioner. Shn’ P.K. Bhaduri, Pan Lawyer for the State. Heard. Grievance of the petitio er is that she is working as Gynecologist and posted at Saidar Patel istrict Hospital, Bilaspur, however, vide order of Annexuie P-3, dated. 0‘11 June 2008, the respondent No. 1 has posted respondent No.5 a In‘charge Civil Surgeon-cum— Chief WWWW W§qi$ ‘"“200 was: m (W) mmwanéa ' W2f mmm£rmm amaqmw ‘ Hospital Superintendent tho gh the respondent No.5 is much junior to the peiitioner as the name f the petitioner in the gradation list of Annexure P-Lhnds place a serial number §,‘ Whereas the na'me of Its'pondent No.5 is at serial umber 33. Learned counsel for e petitioner submits that the petitioner has already nled representa 'on of Annexure P-4 for redressal of her I grievances. However, the s e has not been considered. It is further ' prayed that the respondent be directed to decide her representation Within the specified period. Learned counsel for the State submits that in case the petitioner tiles a flesh representation to the respondent No.3 against her grievances, which have been raised in this petition Within a period of two weeks from today alongwith cei Lifted copy of this order, the same ‘ shall be considered and decided by the respondent No.3 within the period offour weeks horn the date of receipt of representation. In view of the above s ' mission made by learned counsel for the I parties, the instant petition i disposed ofwith liberty to the petitioner to file a &esh detailed rep sentation against her grievances to the respondent No‘3 within two eeks horn today. On such representation / being made, the respondent 0.3 shall consider and decide the same on its own merits in accord ce with law within a period of four weeks nom the date of receipt of the representation. Certified copy as per rulles. Sd/- ' r ‘ Dhirendra Mishra‘i Judge