IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4290 OF 2000 WRIT PETITION NO.4290 OF 2000 WRIT PETITION NO.4290 OF 2000 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:------------------------------------ Mr.P.A.Pol for the petitioner. Mr.R.M.Patne AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3. Mr.M.V.Aiya for respondent no.4. CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 20TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 DATED: 20TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 DATED: 20TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 P.C.: . By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Minister of State for Food and Civil Supplies on 28.7.2000 whereby additional shop was granted to respondent no.4 and the units were divided equally between the petitioner and respondent no.4. At the time when the rule was granted interim relief was also granted and effect of operation of the impugned order was stayed. Thereafter replies were filed on behalf of the respondents and the rejoinder was filed by the petitioner wherein the statement has been made that the entire locality being encroachment has been shifted from Rafiqnagar area to Dindoshi area and 2160 families were directed to be rehabilitated by the society established for that purpose. 2. According to the petitioner, therefore, respondent no.4 - shop has been shifted from those premises. That being the averment made by the petitioner himself nothing further survives in this petition. The petition, therefore, is rejected. ...