THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.461 of 2010 DATED:01-02-2011 Between: Cherukuri Nagamani. ....PETTIONER And Kedari Gurumallu .... RESPONDENT ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 10.07.2008, in C.M.A.No.2 of 2006 on the file of learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kothagudem, wherein the said appeal filed by the respondent herein, was allowed and the order of the trial Court in I.A.No.791 of 2005 in O.S.No.333 of 2005, was set aside. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the record. 3. Respondent herein filed the suit in O.S.No.333 of 2005 for permanent injunction against the petitioner- defendant in respect of the suit schedule house bearing No.2-90 situate in Aswapuram village. Along with the suit, respondent filed I.A.No.791 of 2005 for temporary injunction. According to the respondent-plaintiff, he is the owner of the schedule house and his name is also entered in the Panchayat records and he has been paying the house tax regularly and the petitioner–defendant was trying to highhandedly dispossess him. Petitioner- defendant on the other hand filed a counter and contended that her grandfather was the absolute owner of the suit schedule house and the same was bequeathed to her and after the death of her grandfather, she became the absolute owner of the suit schedule house and she has been in possession and enjoyment of the same. The learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kothagudem by order, dated 22.12.2005, dismissed the said application. Aggrieved by the same, respondent-plaintiff filed C.M.A.No.2 of 2006. The learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kothagudem by the impugned order, dated 10.07.2008, allowed the appeal and set aside the order of the trial Court and consequently allowed I.A.No.791 of 2005 granting temporary injunction in favour of the respondent-plaintiff. 4. The said impugned order was passed on 10.07.2008. About twenty months thereafter, defendant filed the present Civil Revision Petition on 23.12.2009, assailing the order in the C.M.A.No.2 of 2006. This Court while admitting the Civil Revision Petition on 19.02.2010, directed interim suspension of the impugned order. As the matter stood thus, now interim injunction granted by the lower appellate Court in favour of the plaintiff is suspended. 5. It is stated by both sides that the trial of the suit has already commenced. If that is so, it is considered imprudent to go into the merits of the case at this stage in the present proceedings and give a finding as to which of the parties is in possession of the suit schedule property. It is therefore considered just and proper to direct the trial Court to dispose of the suit, in which the trial has already commenced, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, and till such time status quo as on today shall continue. 6. Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with the above direction. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 01st February, 2011 Tsy/KSP