1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. W.P.363 OF 2009 Vikram Vinaykrao Burde.. .vs.. The Distt.Deputy Registrar Co-op.Society and anr.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's directions and Registrar's order. orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.D.V.Dhondarkar, Adv. for the petitioner. Smt.Wasnik, AGP for respondent no.1. Mr.A.M.Quazi, Adv. for respondent no.2. Coram : C. L. PANGARKAR, J. Dated : 19th JUNE, 2009. 1. This is a writ petition against the R.R.C. issued by the District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Society for recovery of the amount against the petitioner. The petitioner had taken loan from M/s Parmatma Ek-sevak Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd. but he did not deposit the amount as agreed. Hence, an application was moved to the said Deputy Registrar for issuance of the recovery certificate. The recovery Certificate has been issued and the petitioner challenges the same. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondents. 2 3. The petitioner’s counsel submits that the recovery certificate is not proper, in as much as, it does not disclose the amount that has been paid by the petitioner in the past. There is no need to mention such a thing. What is required to be mentioned is what is the amount due to the petitioner; that has been so mentioned. That does not vitiate the certificate at all. 4. Further, it has to be borne in mind that the petitioner has a remedy available under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act to file a revision. It seems that the petitioner does not want to file the revision though such remedy is available because while filing such revision at least 50% of the amount is required to be deposited and the petitioner wants to avoid to do so. Even in this petition the petitioner was directed to deposit the amount and he undertook to deposit the amount but it has not been deposited. In the circumstances, I do not find any substance in the petition. It is dismissed. JUDGE. chute