IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3068 of 2011 UMESH MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 29.03.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that his lands which are contiguous to government lands are wrongly being considered and amalgamated on erroneous measurement with government land. He has represented and an enquiry has been ordered by the Additional Collector, Vaishali as back as 27.11.1999. The petitioner has represented even thereafter but is now apprehensive that without demarcation his lands may be utilized for the purposes of road widening. If the matter has already engaged the attention of the authorities and the petitioner has represented for the purpose, all that is required is a direction to the respondents to consider the grievance of the petitioner and dispose if off in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order after due opportunity to him within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt and or presentation of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into merits of the matter and all aspects of fact and law including measurement that may be required on the site are left open for consideration by the respondents themselves. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)