IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4027 of 2009 Date of Decision: March 25, 2011 Sham Lal .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government, Haryana, Development and Panchayat Department, Chandigarh & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. P.S. Sikand, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sukhvinder Singh Nara, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent Nos.1 to 4. Mr. Surinder Mohan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.5. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. In view of report dated 15.3.2011 furnished by Block Development & Panchayat Officer, Raipur Rani, District Panchkula, that indicates that there is no obstruction in the street, no further orders need be passed in this petition. CWP No.4027 of 2009 [2] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that cause of action does not survive any more. 3. The petition is accordingly disposed of. 4. It is made clear that in case petitioner again raises any kind of construction by obstructing the street, respondent No.5 or any other inhabitant would be at liberty to file an application under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (as applicable to Haryana). (AJAI LAMBA) March 25, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?