1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVN. APPLICATION NO. 578 OF 2009 Mr.Bhailal Rajaram Ahergawali & anr. ... Applicants v/s Mr.Balkisan Dulichand Ahergawali ... Respondent Mr.Nitin Deshpande for the applicant. None present for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 17TH FEBRUARY, 2010 P.C.: 1. The applicants were tenants of the respondent. They have been directed to be evicted from the suit premises on the ground of default in payment of arrears of rent and on the ground of bonafide requirement. 2. Both the Courts below have concurrently held that the landlord had proved that the applicants were in default in payment of arrears of rent. Besides this, the Courts below have further concurrently held that the suit premises were 2 required bonafide by the landlord. The Courts have also considered the comparative hardship which would be caused to both parties if the decree for eviction was not passed. The evidence on record established the fact that the tenant, defendant No.1, was residing elsewhere and not in the suit premises. 3. In my view, there is no need to interfere with the concurrent findings of fact recorded by both the Courts below. 4. Civil revision application stands dismissed. ..... 3