IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11520 of 2010 RANA SINGH, SON OF SRI JAY PRAKASH NARAYAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-JAWAHIRPUR, P.S. LAURIYA, DISTRICT-WEST CHAMPARAN...PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…………………….OPPOSITE PARTY. ---------- For the Petitioner : M/s. Ajay Kumar Thakur and Amit Kumar, Advocates. For the State : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 2. 30.4.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 414 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 25(1-B) A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the alleged recovered motorcycle belongs to his cousin brother (Mausera Bhai) and the alleged mobile, which has been recovered, belongs to the petitioner himself. That apart, it is submitted that one empty magazine, which is used in pistol, had been allegedly recovered. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 18.2.2010. It has also been - 2 - submitted that there is no recovery of fire arm or ammunition from the possession of the petitioner. So far as the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is concerned, it is submitted that he is an accused in onther case registered under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Rana Singh, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Lauria P.S. Case No.15/2010, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation - 3 - of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)