§°§E§W§§3LE $HR§ RIMLEEU GQW‘si‘A, EGJH i—*E$?‘§’g%..§ SER§ giiNiL KEjMAR $§§EH2§g &. Mia; #Ammaa§ mg, $4 Q? 2©€§§§ Suni‘i Ram Sinha; 8/0 Bhagwat Ram Smha, aged 21 yrs-“$3 {abeut} Caste- Kazgr‘ Ocsupation— Agriculturist, Minor, Perm&nent resident of Suragibura; Tah. 3am; B§$ii Burg ((3:3). Presan‘iiy res§d§ng.at ViHage Dhamciha, Tah. & P3 Dhamd‘na, Gis‘ti. Dw’g \Cu‘). / t" §$E§$§JS ’a. Pumshottamdaa Sig Ramdas abwt 4O Rb Mamkpuri, agea years, Dam (Kama) Tah‘ & Digit. Kama (CG). Gesupaiian ~ Driver, \Jghicie F ,, \_L wGMPQEwSIE’JmQ, Thmugh Empmyer ~ M;‘$ Arvi Transamrt CO xix: Transpm": Nag’aa", Kama. 2* Mlg gixrvi Tmnsgm £70. Tmmgaort Nagw, Kmba Tah& D%s%‘t. ai'ba. Rggi3%e¥a<i Qwwar 0f Vehicle NoMP26D/5?’GO. 2 Divisaima! Managmj “g"he New Sndia msurame Ca Lid. Pewer Hauae, OE R0316, Ehiiaé; Tah.& Di$ti4 Dus'g {3.6,}. Fie§§sy iawad by Branch Office The New mdia Ensurarace Campami Liméiadi NEA. Kama, mnnacied Wité‘i \Iehicie Nth. inn? mime Campanv Wité‘i ?vi%52§§f3!5?00, Péimy Gave? Nate Ne.§§47$, pe’rba‘ HE62OGG it) m‘Q‘SxQffjm‘ sekiificaiie N07i7860? $x3§ieciian maQ’EK}? , ¢§22§1’G?8. ffé, QM??? $E§”§'i@¥\i fm K3F THE MQTQgi %i'E%-3§SL§E$ RQE @33 Praisem: Shri Somkant ‘Jerma, ccunsei far the appeliam. Nana far resparidenf$ No? and 2. Sm AK Athaiey, counsgi fer mgpandem No.3. QEEQER {wt gvmmg 2am The foéiewing order 0f ihe Calm was ‘gaganed by R§§eav @a’gia, £W§ Appeiianh‘ ciaimam‘: Sumt Ram Sinha i5 3eaking anhaancemeni 9f the sampensaiion awarded by ihe gm ,&.ddii§9na§ Mo‘mr Aomdeni C!aims Tfibunal; Burg {for ahort ‘ihe TribunaV) vide Emvawj dated 13.6?20Q4, pa3$gd in Claim Cgge No.07i2QO4. 2) A$ 6§gain3i We campgnsatien Qf R$.13,GU,€>ODI~ maimed by 'ihe amyeaiam/Ciaimant by fmng a ciaim peafiiioa umder Sgmim 166 of the Mote? Vehiciea‘; Am for me inju‘rie9; $1,13tained by him in tha meta? ascidem rm 22G? .2001; ihe Tr§bunai awardeci a ietal sum Qf Rgmmwfji- as; compensatmn aieng Mm iniareui (g) 6% my wnum‘ fmm ihe dam cf filing a? we Clajm paiiiion iiii‘the dam 0f 3miua£ paymani. ‘j: The Tribuna‘ on a dogs. amut‘my 0f me entir$ evédance §ed m wire §i mm ihai daimani Salim? Ram Smm $u§tained mu§tipie $erimm inguri$$ inciuding fracmreg in iha meior accidem m 22.01.2QO1: the amcia‘ani ocaurred dma to ragh gm nggiigem drwmg Gf’ the a‘river 0f ihe QffEMing vehicée Truck begring {@gigirgftmn Na. M.P.-26Di5?90; as ‘E‘he abava Offending vehicig ‘ E LO Truck 0n thS daie of i‘he accident wag insureé with the Nm/v indie: maggrance Compamy Lim§ted and ma InSurance Cempany oeuld mt esiabé‘i$h any bmach“ m“ the pmicy conditions, the insurance Campany wag iéabie i3 pay compensation t0 ihe ciaimant. 4).: A3 ihe fesmndénts hava not Wad any appeal against tha award, meabovg findings recorded by the Tribunai have now aiiained finaiiiy 5) Tm Tribuna! conniderimg the numba and naiwe 0f me inguries prayed i0 have been (~3ustainad by the daimant in the mctnr accident and ma amount pmved to have been span? on treatment, avvatdad R$.66,GGDL towards medtcat expen$e$; RsEQiOUGI- tnwarctsy tow 0t future earning capacity on accaunt 0t inn ingunzas and tiacturess anti? the re$uttant Perrnanént disabttit ; R$.10,QOQ!— tnwards pain and. suffering; and RaiGOtJ/l towards spgciat diet. The Tribunat; thua awarded a tntat sum 0t IR$.1,09,QGOX— as V campgnsatton tc: the ctaimant. The Tribunal further directed paymmt 0f interest can the above amount of oompenoatton of Rat IQQjQOGK- @ 6% per annum from the date of fiiing'or' tha claim potition tiii the date of astuai payment. 5) Shri Somkant Verma, teamed counee! for the anpeiiant submitted. that the Tribunai has erred in net awarding env' eum tevverde attendant end eenveyance; in awarding tow ameunt of Revitafiiieit eniy tevvarde toss in the future earning capacity on aeeenat ei" the injuriee and fractures and the teeutiant permanent ; ant in awarding law compensation of Rei iOQiOOQI- eniy. g eieabiiit ?} $hri AKA Athaley, learneci munsei f9? respcndent No.3 the New india i-nsurame Company Limmd; an ifhe ether hand} s'upmrim me award arxd mmended the}? ihe compgnsatim 0f Rf$.1;0$;(300/- awarded by the Tribuma! is jwt and propa“ campensation in the facts) and {:imum3’t&nce5 of €h§pragam casg. 8a) m 3 motor accident c§a§m,casei what §$ impar‘tanf is; that, the (:Qmpenga‘ijon i0 be awarded by thxa Eaudg/Tribunal3 shou!d be just and pmpar compensatign m we fams and Circumstances {3f the SSW: it $h0u!d neithar ma a meager amaun‘t of comgensation, nor 9 Eananza, M4) Navy we athaii examine a$ t0 whether the eempensetmn ef Ra’LGQQWM- awardee‘ by ihe Tribune! is guei and preper compeneatien in the tests and ctroumetancee of the present caee. ”10} Cieimant Sunit Ram Sinha 0n the dete at“ the accident was aged abeut ”t7 yeare. Hts father is an egrieutturist. The ctaimant elaimeni that priet tn the accident he used tn aseist hi3 father in hie egrieuiturai aperationei The ciaimant euetained tracturee of his C3“ mh iegs ie eetahiiehed tram the evidenee 0t A‘JilE. L‘r. VS. Etheghei. it ie n matter 0t eommon knowiedge that substantial amount i3 required ta be spent en the treatment at ftaetures. The ciaimant eetfered physicai nain Win mentiai ageny en eeeeunt ottne hectares oi his both iegc fer a period of about 4—6 monthe, The Tithenei nae oen‘einiy fatten into error in not awarding any sum towards: attenijent and conveyance 4 H) The compenSaiion 9f R31 ,GQ,UC‘B/- awamed by the Tribunal \Mhery examined in tha cantexi of the abave—meniimai bmad fga’twgs ca” thlg Gaga in Gur apinian; ig certainiy on the laws? $§de nd daggrve$ it} be mh‘anoeti m gamg exkent. @2) Cemidering H thg raievahi awesis; £3? W) mai‘cgr, \Ma ara 0f '§‘h@ (Amman t‘nai: furihw guvan 0f R3.21,{.‘10Q/- imw$ive of Smereat cammneni en the enhanced amouni of campensaiion wwid make the mmmensaiisn 0f R31 ,09,0QO;’— awarded by tha Tribunai as ju$t and proper sempiamat'aom in the fade end aircumetancee 9f the preeent caee 13) The anneal wed by the appenam/ claimani: fer enhancemeni of the compeneatim; §hefefo{e, ie aNowed in pert The Cie§mant is awardee? fmher sum of R321 ,006l- incIgSive of interest componeni on the enhenced amour}? ef compensatien in eddition to the eum of Re? ,QQQOOL ewerdee by the Tribune}. ‘14} Respondent N93 the New indie ineurence Company Limited ie grenied three menths’ time for depoeiting the tetet eum ef R321 ,(MDD/w before the concerning Claime Trtbueei. 15} NO order ea te mete. x Sun'n Kumar 5m“? v' 3d:— Sd/— L / Judge; e 77 i»- hiefJustice < subbu C