HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.13755 of 2011 ORDER : This writ petition is filed to declare the action of the respondents herein in mutating the name of the 4th respondent in the revenue records in respect of land admeasuring Ac.3.16 gts. in Sy.No.455 of Polkampally Village, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, belonging to the petitioner and his other brothers, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. According to the petitioner, his father late Venkaiah and his two brothers, by name, late Kavali Pentaiah and K.Kistaiah, are owners and pattadars of land admeasuring Ac.3.16 gts. in Sy.No.455 of Polkampally Village, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal. As there was no partition, the petitioner along with nine other brothers are jointly cultivating the land. The petitioner came to know that the name of the 4th respondent was entered in the revenue records in respect of land in question, without any valid transaction. As such, the petitioner approached the 3rd respondent-Tahasildar, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal and submitted a representation on 18.12.2010 requesting him to incorporate his name and the names of his brothers in the pahanies, pattadar pass books and title deeds in respect of the subject land. Meanwhile, the 3rd respondent issued Memo No.Spl/2010 dated 02.12.2010 informing the petitioner about non-availability of records concerning the subject land. The 3rd respondent again issued memo dated 01.04.2011 in response to the representation dated 19.01.2011 made by the petitioner. Aggrieved by the action of the 3rd respondent, the petitioner approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue submits that the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy of appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer and instead of availing the said remedy, petitioner has straightaway approached this Court. 4. Since the petitioner is having an efficacious alternative remedy under the Act, this writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to avail the said remedy. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ C. PRAVEEN KUMAR, J 3rd July 2015. mar