IN THE HIGH COUR T OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1593 of 2010 Laxman Prasad, Radha Kishun S/O Late Jagarnath Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Daulatganj, P.S.Bhagwan Bazar, Distt-Saran At Chhapra Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through Secretary Food and Consumer Protection Department Old Secretariat, Patna. 2. District Magistrate Saran at Chapra 3. Sub Divisional Officer Sadar Chhapra, Distt-Saran At Chapra. ----------- 2 18.07.2011 This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 03.08.2010 passed by learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No. 17328 of 2008. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the petitioner’s licence was cancelled by the impugned order against which he filed an appeal. Appeal was heard and the appellate authority has confirmed the rejection by a reasoned order dealing with all facts, against which C.W.J.C. No.17328 of 2008 has been preferred. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon a Division Bench Judgment of this Court in which it has been held that the revisional power or 2 appellate power cannot cure the defect or fill up the gap. From the judgment impugned it clearly indicates that the learned Single Judge has dealt with the issue and after giving his reason has dismissed the C.W.J.C. No.17328 of 2008. It is settled law that in exercise of power under Article 226 the High Court cannot sit in appeal, therefore, we are not inclined to interfere with the order impugned passed by learned Singe Judge. Appeal is devoid of merit, dismissed, accordingly. PN (Prakash Chandra Verma, J.) (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)