IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 31ST JULY 2009 / 9TH SRAVANA 1931 RP.No. 571 of 2009(T) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WA.534/2009 IN W.P.(C) NO.412/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT/PETITIONER: ---------------------- MOHANA KUMAR M.R, MOHANALAYAM HOUSE, KUNDULUSSERRY P.O., KERASSERRY, PALAKKAD 678 641. BY ADV. SRI.H.BADARUDDIN SMT.AYSHA RAHMAN RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD. 2. THE CUSTODIAN OF PRIVATE FOREST AND CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND WILF LIFE, OLAVANKODE, PALAKKAD. 3. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, OLAVAKKODE, PALAKKAD. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PALAKKAD TALUK. SPL.GOVT.PLEADER (FORESTS), SRI.P.M.PAULOSE THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & V.GIRI, JJ. ------------------------------ R.P.No.571 OF 2009 -------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of July, 2009 O R D E R ~~~~~~~~ Balakrishnan Nair, J. Heard. The review petitioner submitted that there is a mistake in the first sentence of the judgment under review. In fact, the appellants did not submit before this Court that they were evicted on 13.6.2008. That submission was made by the respondents. That is evident from the judgment under appeal also, it is pointed out. 2. We heard the learned Government Pleader on the above point. We are satisfied with the submission that the appellants were evicted on 13.6.2008 was made by the respondents. So, the 1st sentence in the judgment under review is corrected as follows: “It is the case of the respondents that the appellants were evicted on 13.6.2008. The appellants submit that they made representations in terms of Ext.P1 for assignment of land.” The Review Petition is disposed of as above. (K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE) (V.GIRI, JUDGE) ps