IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11425 of 2010 RADHESHYAM YADAV, Son of Shri Lalan Yadav, resident of village Sonbarsha, P.S. Shahpur, Out Post Karnamepur, District Bhojpur at Arrah ….. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Ram Chandra Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, A.P.P. ----- 2 26.04.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner files supplementary affidavit stating that the injuries sustained by the persons were simple in nature. Let it be kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 341, 323, 307, 379, 324 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and further Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is dispute between the informant and the co-accused Majhil Yadav who happens to be the agnate of the petitioner. It is also submitted that the petitioner and his father both have been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is stated to be 2 student and had appeared in Intermediate Examination 2010. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner is in custody since 18.1.2010 and is having clean antecedent. It is also contended on behalf of the petitioner that the allegation of firing is general and omnibus against all the persons. Learned counsel for the State submitted that the petitioner and all of the accused persons tried to take away the horse and bufallow of the informant. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, RADHESHYAM YADAV, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Arrah in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 276 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who is not accused, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the 3 petitioner. If, after his release in this case, the petitioner is again found implicated in similar nature of cases, then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)