FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO.490/2009 Sovinda Kisan Wanjari ..vs.. Kamlabai Dadu Mehar =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- C ORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK,J. DATED : 29th MARCH, 2010. Heard Shri Talmale, learned advocate for the appellant. Both the courts have concurrently held that the plaintiff, the sister of the defendant no.1 and 2 had succeeded in proving that she had 1/3rd share in the suit property and was entitled for partition and separate possession. The findings recorded by both the courts are based on a proper appreciation of material evidence on record. The submission made on behalf of the appellant that the courts have not considered the material evidence, does not appear to be proper. Hence the judgment reported in (2001)3 SCC Page 179 cannot apply to the facts of this case. Since no substantial question of law arises for determination in this second appeal, the same is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE SMP