1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O.NO.926 of 2010 in M.C.A.ST.NO.5413/2010 IN REJ.L.P.A.NO.334/2008 (D) IN W.P.NO.2517/1991 (D) Ranapratap Shriram Malviya ..vs.. Resident Dy.Collector, Amt. and ors. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.A.S.Chandurkar Adv. for the applicant. Mr.Agrawal Adv. for resp.no.3 and 4. C ORAM : J.P.DEVADHAR AND A.B.CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED : 11th October, 2010. Heard. There is a delay of one year and 174 days in filing the Letters Patent Appeal. Advocate Mr. Agrawal appears for contesting respondent nos.3 and 4 and has no objection for condonation of delay. Hence, we are inclined to condone the delay in filing the M.C.A. for restoration of the application. Delay stands condoned. Civil Application stands disposed of. M.C.A.ST.NO.5413 of 2010. Heard. For the reasons stated in the M.C.A., the same is allowed. Civil Application No.6978 of 2004 is restored to file. 2 M.C.A.stands disposed of. C.A.No.6978 of 2004 is allowed with consent. REJ.L.P.A.334 of 2008. Heard. Taken up for final disposal with consent of the learned counsel for the parties. In view of the judgment dated 1/10/2010 in L.P.A.No. 150 of 2010 (Kalpesh Hemantbhai Shah ..vs.. Manhar Auto Sotres), we have heard the learned counsel for the parties. It is not in dispute that the present Letters Patent Appeal arises out of the dispute between landlord and tenant and this court has already taken a view in the aforesaid judgment that Letters Patent Appeal would not be maintainable. For the reasons recorded in the aforesaid judgment, we dismiss the Letters Patent Appeal as not maintenable. JUDGE JUDGE. pzc 3