IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP Nos. 3053, 3054, 3055, 3056, 3057 and 3059 of 2011 Decided on: May 20, 2011. CWP No. 3053 of 2011 Het Ram vs. State of H.P. and anr. CWP No. 3054 of 2011 Jangbir Singh vs. State of H.P. and anr. CWP No. 3055 of 2011 Krishan Lal vs. State of H.P. and anr. CWP No. 3056 of 2011 Om Parkash vs. State of H.P. and anr. CWP No. 3057 of 2011 Salochana vs. State of H.P. and anr. CWP No. 3059 of 2011 Sita Ram Sharma vs. State of H.P. and anr. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : Ms. Archna Dutt, Advocate ( In all the petitions). For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G.(In all the petitions). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim the benefit of ad-hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgments of this Court rendered in CWP (T) 2 No. 7712 of 2008, Paras Ram vs. State of H. P. and LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent No.1/competent authority to examine the matter in light of the judgments, referred to above, and take appropriate action within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of the writ petition and copies of the judgments referred to above, by the petitioner concerned. 2. These writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice May 20, 2011 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (BSS/Jai) Judge