^ ^p-f^]^ IN THE HICH COURT OF CHHATTISCARH AT BILASPUR (CC) WRIT PETITION (S) N0. -^'L^ /2006 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER ^4-^-"... ^ ^'cft.--'' o^ ,^y '"'^"" RESPONDENTS ^'^^ \%^^^° &. G- i?U&' 4. " Deovrat Sao, aged about 53 years, son of Shri Rohit Kumar Sao, occupation - Service, Deputy Ranger (Up van Kshetrapal) On deputation - in the Department of Chhattisgarh Rajya Laghu' vanopaj Sangh Maryadit, State of Chhattisgarh, at Zila vanopaj Sahakri Sangh Maryadit, Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh, (Chhattisgarh) <»; VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, througti secretary, Department of Forest, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Conservator of Forest, Bilaspur Circle, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division - Dharamjaigarh, Distt Raigarh (C.S.) Managing Director (Prabandtr Sanchalak) Chhatisgarh Rajya r ,/%y ra=-^'3CW-~iTir|ffi"-^^^^^^;j3ES^^^^;:B-^^^^^^^y^^^^^^, Laghu Vanopaj (Vyapar Evam Vikas) Sahkari Sangh Maryadit, A-25, V.I.P. Estate Khamhardih, Shankar Nagar, Distt.Raipur (C.G.) ^5 Managing Director (Prabandh Sanchalak) Zila Vanopaj Sahkari Sangh Maryadit Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) /6 Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Bijapur, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) 7 Awar Sachiv, Department of Forest, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Petitioner, named above, respectfully submits as under:- XI-HC-78 HI*1WI sb*11<sh S^'-STFTRTO, tSiTn'M'16, Ri-liwy ^..^^^.^.^200^ 3Tl^?T<Tgg? (ipfg^ST) sn^r^rfeNi (raran^raiffw -f~ ??gTWHfitT3n^r 14-8-2006 Shri A.N. Bhakta, counsel foi| the Shri Satish Gupta, Dep< respondents, on advance copy. Heard. By the instant petition, the| order dated 6-7-2006 whereby the| been transferred from Dharamjaifllarh Range. Learned counsel for the pet|li( promoted from the post of Foresteit 3-2006, he was sent on deputatior) was relieved on 7-3-2006 and he| impugned order he has been trar|sf post. Learned counsel for the petitioner may be aliowed to mak^ bringing this anomaly tn the notice| to decide the same, to which objection. Having heard iearned coun^< facts and circumstances of the ca< on the merit of the case, the pe|S representation along with a copy ofjthis all his grievances within a perioc) respondent No.1 shall decide the «ftl<<tCT<fl-f IIICl'l ^'tecA'<Rl't<K ^T3Tf^IT3IT^r petitioner. ty Govt. Advocate for the State/ Ipetitioner has questioned his transfer petitioner showing him as Forester has Forest Range to Beejapur Forest poner submitted that the petitioner was to Deputy Ranger vide order dated 7- to the State Minor Forest Produce, he also joined on that post. Now, vide sferred showing as Forester i.e. lower petittoner further submitted that the a representation to respondent No.1 of respondent No.1 and he be directed counsel for respondents has no leafrned ^ei for the parties, having regard to the >e and without expressing any opinion titioner is altowed to make a detaiied petition to respondent No.1 raising of 10 days from today and in turn, tepresentation of the petitioner within a P.T.O. XI-HC-78 SST^TRRW, »Tnu'l(o,Rldiuy *TTq^(TSbH|cb ^; 200 an^rMsith ('i^t^sff) a.n^r^iTf^TN? craTan^Tshiiti Ban/e E ?^ITWrf?(T3n^T ^. period of 30 days from the date| considering alithe points raised by| In the meantime, the eifect respect of the petitioner shall rem^ petitioner is decided. With the direction aforesaid, Consequentiy, M.(W.)P. No.l Parties are entitled for certifi^d of receipt of the representation, aftsr pie petitioner, in accordance with law. ^nd operation of the impugned order in ^in stayed, till the representation of the pie petition stands disposed of. ?318/2006 atso stands disposed of. copyofthisorder. wifepfl^ wRffif te^t rfwzR ^sri^tirsn^T Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo !C P.T.O. 3/^v ^ F"