\7 -^ HIGH COURT OF CHHArTISQARH AT BILASPTOt Ctoril Reririoa No. 92 OF 2010 AppBcant Appellaat Resnondents Versas 2) Snafc Jenis Paaaa, W/o Aiiuj Lal Panna, R/o Qr. No. 41-C-E, Pocket, Maroda Sector, Bhilai Nagar, District Duxg (C.G.). Managing Direct&r, Bhilai Steel PIant, Bhilai, District Dwg (C.G.). Estate Officer uader PubUc Premjses (Evictioa of Unaufhorfaed Occupants) Aet 1971 Township AdiaBustaative Office BuiMing, lat Ptoor, Indira PEdacc, Bhilai, District Dufg (C.G.). MEMORANDUM OF REWKION PETITION UNDBEl SBGTICUI 118 0» THB CODE OF CTVIL PROCBDUItB. (SB :Hon'bIe Mr. T.P.Shaxmst, J.) Present:- Shri Sudhir Verma, Advocate for (he appiicanl/petitioner. Respondents no>t noticed. ORAL-ORDEa (Pasaedon 03/09/201^ 1. Hcaid. 2. Oider impugaed dated 14/6/20l0 passedby DtetnctJudgc, Ding ia Misc. Civil Appeal No. 09/2010 dismisaa^ the appeal filed agaiast fhe order of eviction dated 17/4/2009 passed by Estate Officer ia Casc No. 16/09 under PubUc Preiaaises (Evictfon of Unauttiorized Occupaats) Act, 1971 peruscd, 3. Shri Siidhir Verma, Advocate for fhe petitioner are heari.. 4. Aiyunent of learaed counsel for the petitioncr and cnder impt^ncd reveate that husbaad of petitioner which was empl<yee m BTaSsd. Steel Plant as per claim of respondent No. 2 his services has beca terminated, occupation was afflotted to him as a eiaployee when aBar termmation of his semces eviction order was passcd. Occupation £ \ ^ 6. was not aUotted to preseat petitioner. She te residing in the said premisea. As per claiin of petitioner husband of petitioner is i»t attendiag fhe semces but tBnninatioa ordcr has not been ser»ed upon her husband fhcrefore she is cntitted to retain fhe house. Order impugned reveal Uiat semces ofh.usbaiMl ofthe petittonM- has been teraainated accommodatfon was not aUotted to petitfoner. She was not aufhorized to occupy fhc accomiaodation aflter consideriag thc aforesaid factual and legal aspeet Court bekiw has disiaissed fhe appeal fited on bchalf of fhc petttfoncr, I do not find aay iUe^Hly in the order uapugaed. Coasequently, civil xevisioa is Habte to be disaaissed and is hcreby disinissed. Considering fhe fact pTesent petitiouer is woman stae is directed ta haad over the vacaat possession on or before 4th October-2010. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma r