IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18987 of 2009 SITARAM MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05 09.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in this renewed prayer for bail under Sections 302, 201, 120(B) of the Penal Code is the grant of bail to co- accused, who named him in his statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. in Cr. Misc. Case No. 28302 of 2007. That even in the statement of co-accused under Section 164 Cr.P.C. no overt act of assault is attributed to the petitioner when the dead body is only alleged to have been recovered from the agricultural field of the petitioner. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-II, Patna in connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 288 of 2006, Session Trial No. 1552 of 2007. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)