Y; ^- tam Singh Mourya, Age about 37 vear. Asstt. .Teachei' S/o Shfi Sukuluram Mourya Boys Hostal Rotma, Block - Bastar, Distt. - Bastar (C.G.) 2. Bhiv Ram Nag Age about 41 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Dhaairam Nag Primary School Khadka (Madhota) Block- Bastar, Distt. - Bastar (C.G.) 3. Manish Verma Age about 38 vear, Asstt. Teacher S/o Late Shri L.K.Venna Prunary School Adawal lock - Bastar, Distt. - Bastar (C.G.) 4. Chandi-a Bilas Agrawaiti Age about 38 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Late Shri H.R.ACTawani Hisli School IchcMiapur Block - Bastar, Distt. - Bastar (C.G.) 5. Smt. Pushp Lata Katlam Age about 41 year, Asstt. Teacher W/o Shri Suresh Kumar Katlain Pruiiary School Ghatkawali Block - Bastar, Distt. - Bastar (C.G.) 6. Kaariochan Bisai Age about 41 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Slu-i Lofcaath Bisai Pi-imaiy School Besrapal Bloek - Bastar, Distt. - Bastar (C.G.) 7. Smfc Nirmala Thatenr Age about 42 year, Asstt. Teacher W/o Shri N.S.Thakur Pramary School Kolchur Block - Bastai-, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) 8. Ku. Dayamani Nag Age about 39 year, Asstt. Teacher D/o Shri Patar Ram Nag Middle School Kolchur Block -Bastar,,Distt. - Bastar (C.G.) 1. State Govt. of Odiattisgarh Through Secretary Tribal Welfars Department & Educatioa Departnient D.K.8. Bhawaa, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) 2. Astt. Coinnrissioner Jagdalpur, District -Bastar (C.G.) 3. Disfrict Educaiton OfBcer Jagdalpur, District - Bastar (C.G. 4. Block Education QiBcer B^tar, District -Bastar (C.G.) 5. Trewure & Accounts Jagdalpur, District - Bastar (C.G.) WMT PET^^0^7 UTsDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTLTION OF INDIA. Prssent: SPm Soailcatit Veniia, Advocate for the petitiona-s. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Gov-t. Advocate forthe State/respondents. (Passed on 1 lttl day ofMay, 2007) Leamed counsel appearins for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly subniit that the fact aad questioa of iaw iavolved in fhe present writ petition are fhe same to that of ia Yashwant Kmnar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Cornoration, Dau-g and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 961, which has beea disposed ofvide order dated 03.04.2006. 2 Leamed courisel appearine for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. / In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gdpesh Kwnar Vemw vs. The State Gwt. ofChhattisgarh and another) and ofher connected matters, decided bv this Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Seeretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Educatioa Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclature of the Basic TraininE Institirte, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education. i.e., D.Ed. Accordmelv. Ifae D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kwnar Verma vs. The State Gavt. ofChhattisgarh and aiwther) (Supra). Accordingly, the writ petitioa is allowed in terms ofthe order passed in the case ofYasfawant Kuaiar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durj and another (Supra), subject to verification of the faet as to whether the petitioners have acquired D.Ed. Examination Certificate on their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further wfaether thev have been paid two advaace mcrements or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge ¥-