IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2010 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3590 of 2010() ------------------------------------ CRA.208/2008 of SESSIONS COURT, (ADHOC) FAST TRACK COURT – II, MANJERI ST.8517/2003 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-II, PARAPPANANGADI. .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S)/APPELLANT/ACCUSED ----------------------------------------------------- SHERIN MARRY, W/O. BENNY JOHN, EVER GREEN, TEACHER ST.ANTONY'S JUNIOR BAISC SCHOOL, VATAKARA P.O., VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.C.RATNAKARAN SMT.M.R.JAYALATHA RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. P. VEERENDRAKUMAR, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O. P.I. GOPALAKRISHNA MENON, THANAT HOUSE, P.O. VALLIKKUNNU, TIRURANGADI TALUK, VALLIKKUNNU AMSOM DESOM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.MOHANAN, V.T.K R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.TEK CHAND THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ V. RAMKUMAR, J. ==================== Crl.R.P. No. 3590 of 2010 ==================== Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2010. ORDER The accused in S.T. No. 8517 of 2003 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Parappanangadi for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against her concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A. No. 11423 of 2010 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. Money, if any, deposited by the revision petitioner before the trial court pursuant to the orders, if any, passed by the superior courts shall be refunded to the revision petitioner/accused. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2010. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv