IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2831 of 2010 SUNAINA TRIPATHI, W/O LATE RAM KRIPAL TRIPATHI, R/O VILL.- SARABALI, P.O.+P.S.- KARPI, DISTT.- ARWAL ( BIHAR ) ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, JEHANABAD. 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ARWAL. 5. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR ESTABLISHMENT, JEHANABAD. 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER. MANPUR, GAYA. 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KARPI, AT DISTT.- ARWAL. 8. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, AT BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA. ----Respondents ----------- 6. 16.11.2010 A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no.8. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent-State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that although the petitioner is receiving her family pension, however, the same has not been revised giving effect to the revision of pay scale as per the Sixth Pay Revision; with the result the petitioner is not receiving the full amount of family pension. Learned counsel for the respondent-Accountant General submits that steps in this regard have been taken as per letter no.426 dated 4th of June, 2010, addressed to the petitioner, with a copy to the Block Development Officer, Karpi, Arwal to send the revised pay scale of the husband of the petitioner, if any, so that the family - 2 - pension could be revised, vide Annexure E to the counter affidavit. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the grievances, as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to present her grievances by way of representation before the District Magistrate, Arwal (respondent no.4), with a copy each to respondents no.7 and 8. In case such a representation is filed stating the details of her grievances as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in her representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be redressed to enable her to receive the correct family pension. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)