IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6575 of 2009 Hari Narain Mahto son of Ramdeo Mahto, resident of Bariaria, Police Station- Sangrampur, District- East Champaran…Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Bihar……………………………….Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 01.04.2009. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Allegation in the F.I.R. is that the petitioner alongwith others allegedly come to informant’s house to negotiate for compromise in a case filed by son of the deceased which was refused. Thereafter, it is said that the petitioner and others took the deceased near a temple in side of a pond and provided him wine with poison resulting into his death, thereafter, his dead body was allegedly disposed of by the petitioner and others openly. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner allegation about forcing the compromise and at the same time taking the deceased to take wine can not be believable for petitioner’s arrest at the moment. I also agree with this submission. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 78 of 2007, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P. C. U.K. (Mandhata Singh,J)