Lsp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1157 of 2009 Baban Bapu Borpate ...Petitioner V/s. Yashoda Yeshwant Patil & anr. ...Respondents Mr. Kuldeep S. Patil for the petitioner. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. DATED DATED DATED : 2ND MARCH, 2009 : 2ND MARCH, 2009 : 2ND MARCH, 2009 P.C. . Heard Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. Even if the Petitioner may be justified in pointing out that the opinion recorded by the Appellate court that the Petitioner had never raised any dispute in the Lower Court in his pleadings about the deceased Yeshwant getting suit land by way of adoption or bequeathing his property by Will dated 27th January, 1992 may be correct-to the extent that the reference to the said document was made during the cross-examination. Even so, the question is whether the Petitioner has made out good ground to entertain application under Order-XLI Rule 27 to permit the Petitioner to produce new documents for the first time at the appeal stage. 3. This application has been filed by the Petitioner on the assertion that the Petitioner-appellant has 2 become aware about the Adoption Deed and zerox copy thereof has also come in his possession only recently. No details have been given in the application. The source from where and when the zerox copy was received or information received is not disclosed. There is absolutely no justification to accept the request of the appellant to permit him to produce new document for the first time at the appeal stage. 4. Dismissed. [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.] [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.] [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.]