IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2009 / 18TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 23759 of 2008(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.K.SUNIL, S/O.DAMODARAN, ANITHA BHAVAN, P.O. CHELERI,(VIA) KANNADIPARAMBA, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR REP.. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR. BY GOVT. PLEADER SM.T M.R. SREELATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No. 23759 OF 2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 8th day of January, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner states that he applied to the RTA, Kannur for renewal of his regular permit. According to him, there upon the RTA sought concurrence of the sister RTA's. Petitioner states that concurrence has been communicated by Exts.P2 and P3. It is stated that even after the receipt of Exts. P2 and P3, the Secretary adjourned the matter and final decision has not been taken so far. A reading of Ext.P5 shows that the proceedings have been adjourned awaiting the response of KSRTC. This evidently shows that a final decision on the petitioner's application for renewal of his permit has not been taken. In view of this, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to take a final decision on the application for renewal filed by the petitioner as /2/ expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 8 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ /2/