IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23703 of 2009 Between: Sriram Venkanna & others … Petitioners And Govt., of A.P., rep., by its Secretary, Irrigation Department, Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri V. Sunil Babu for Sri M.V.S. Suresh Kumar Counsel for respondents 1-3: AGP for Irrigation & CAD Counsel for respondent No.4: Sri G. Mallesham for Sri P. Prabhakar Reddy This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23703 of 2009 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent No. 3 in proceeding further in pursuance of notice No.60A1, dated 16.09.2009, as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Irrigation and Sri G. Mallesham representing Sri P. Prabhakar Redey, learned counsel for respondent No.4, submitted that respondent No.4 has removed the obstruction to the existing canal in pursuance of notice dated 16.09.2009 issued by respondent No.3. The learned counsel for the petitioners has not disputed the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents. Inasmuch as the petitioners’ grievance stands redressed with the removal of the obstruction in the existing canal, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.30778 of 2009 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is also disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 19.07.2011 ES