IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No. 7230/2010 Rajenra Kumar & ors Vs State of Rajasthan 29.7.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Ajay Singh - for the petitioner Mr Laxman Meena - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that main allegations exist against Sonu and not against petitioners thus petitioners may be granted bail. Learned PP, on the other hand, has opposed the bail application and submits that though main allegations exist against Sonu but petitioners are also involved in the matter. Hence bail may not be granted to the petitioners. After considering the rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners may be given liberty to surrender before the court below with a direction to the court below to decide the bail application of the petitioner on the same day. In view of aforesaid, petitioners may surrender before the court below and if, on surrender, they file an application for bail then the court below may consider and decide the same expeditiously and, if possible, on the same day. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma