XI-HC—22 § $&@$ lmw of writ of certiorari striking down n order of respondent No.1 direoti g the opening of the History sheet of the petitioner and placing him un er surveiiiance. lt seems that with e passage of time i.e. round about 2 ‘ years, the matterl‘as lost its cause of action. IS Somla z» 10-3-2005 When the matter is called out, none present on behaif of the petitioner. No representation s made. Mr. Utkarsh Verma, Parel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.1. The matter pertains to the year 1993 and this was regarding issua Therefore, the petition dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/— r v L.C. BHADOO ‘ " Judge // / (Chetfe‘w