IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1277 of 2005 DR.SADHU SHARAN Versus THE BHIM RAO AMBDEKAR BIHAR UN ----------- 14 19.9.2008 By order dated 12.5.2008 this Court had directed the University to consider the grievances of the petitioner. In compliance of the order of this Court the retiral dues of the petitioner have been recalculated and a chart has been annexed to the supplementary show cause to show the rate at which the pension etc. was were paid to the petitioner. Dr. Uma Shankar Prasad appearing on behalf of the petitioner on the other hand submits that the University has wrongly shown that excess payment has been made to the petitioner. It is further submitted that they have not really fixed the quantum of pension and as such under these circumstances it cannot be said that excess amount was paid. If the petitioner has any grievances against the order passed by the University, the matter can be resolved in a proper forum and not by a Court hearing this contempt application. 2 In the circumstances, I find that the order of this Court has been complied with and as such this contempt application is disposed of. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)