/':^ ,^' £'.- w ^ o' ^.^ •••^•--'•^>^ " \1.^ Q£^ """XI-HG—78 311^1 •3SV K-\ ^Sff 3TT^l Sh4fl^ 75? "41<41<yf'4, (Sitiiy'16, ?SIC1I'M1< WflM! (hlich •W^ 200 STI^T TTSRT (1clid'<'i?) W.P. PET!TIOHBR Bhikfaa^n Lal Patel, S/o Prem Lal Patcl, aged V^ years, Occupation- Service, workmg post of Sliiksliakarjiu CIass-III at School Durgpali, Vikas Khand District Mahasamuiid (CG) about 2p ou the PriiDarvl Pithoia,] Versds RESPONDEWTTS 1. df 2. 3. 4. 5. State Paiichat D.K.S. Collectd Chhattis^rh, ttirough Secretaiy, ,rat aud Social Welfare Departnient, phawan, Raipur, District-Raipur (CG) Mhasann.md, Diatrict- Mahas^niund (CG) SB: HOH. SHRI DHIRENDRA 0.3-03-2009 Shri Suiul Sahu; counsel Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Heacd on I.A. No. 1, appl^ Applicatiou is allowed. Grievaiice of the petitioi Karmi Grade-III vide order 28,6.2007. However, his Writ Petition (S) No.y5/08 consideration, passed an iater) ^NwqN iwwif •if'fsi^ Tfw^n: ^? sifin aiitsi SlNo.: Chjef qxeciitlve OflBcer, Janpad Pan.chayat PilUoraJ Distiict-Mahasamuuu (CG) Districtl Education OfiBcer, Mahasamund, District|Mahasamtind (CQ) CIuef E]xecutwe Officer, District Paachayat Mahasa|Diund, District-Mabasamund (CG) WRIT PBTITIOH UtiDBR AKHCLE 226 W THE <X>»STtTUTIONOF IKDI& MISHRA for fhe petitioner. Jiawyer for fhe State. }l|cation for takiag docuinent on record. Dbcument is taken cui record. ^er is fhat Ue was appointed as Shikaha 25.6.2007. He joined his semces on was canedled. The petitioner fued dated appoyitment befote this Court and ttus Court; after due iaterjin oiidcr in thc said writ pctition filcd by B"" XI-HE—78 sv^v 'vi R-fi* '<TSTT 3TT^ff ^tHfo^ 'S^ "4MI<-1^, ©tlly'Kc,fsfdiy^i *I!HMI (h*(rai SII^T ^W ('j^f^^t;) ^iiw ^ifei sn^i 7- pctitioner the petitioner. Thereafter, the Ulttmately, vide order dated l' fited by the petitioner aad othei termuiation was quashed. Hcw salary to the petitioner after lus Leamed counsel for fhe approaching the aufhority tun|c however, fhe respondeats have further submits that ttie representation before the re^ grievances raised in this petil inade, the respondent No.3 b< wittun speciBed period. On fhe other hand, the petitioner ffles Iresh repres) rcdressal oftiis grievances, fhe fhe respondent No.3 wifhin a receipt ofrepresentation. in view of the above the instant petitiou is disposc(| U'esh representation befope grieyances raised ia this petitutn the respondent No.3 shafl consf of four weeks fiom tlie dste qil<lI<'1<ft'T ^TFRff ^f ^S^ <f^l-(^R ^sfRmsii^r [^etitioner gave his joining on 1.2.2008. (.3.2008, fhe petition (WP (S) No.95/08) [petitions were aBowed and the order of tever, the respondents are not paying |oinmgon 1.2.2008. petttioner subzuits that he has been and again for releasing his salaiy; Inot taken anv actfon in the matter. He may be pennitted to file ^pondent No.3 for redressal of his |on aad on such representation beiag further directed to dccide the same leamfcd counsel for fhe State subinits that if mtation before the respondent No.3 fbr iame shall be considered and decided bv Iperiod of four wecks fioin fhe date of subDJtfesion oflcamed counsel for the parties, ofwifh Uberly to thc petitkiner to ffle respoudeut No.3 raisir^ all thc i, On such representation being made, |der and decide the saiae withia a period ttie ofr^ceipt ofrepreseutation. Sd/- ..._ ^e^ra^8 iudge ^