IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 104 of 2004 (M/B) Prof. Vishnu Sahai, S/o Late Sri Paramatma Sahai, R/o Balrampur House, Nainital. ….Petitioner Versus 1. University of Kumaon, District Nainital through its Registrar. 2. Vice Chancellor, University of Kumaon, District Nainital 3. Executive Council, University of Kumaon, Nainital. ….Respondents ………… None for the petitioner. Mr. B.D.Upadhyaya, Advocate for the respondents. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon. Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon. M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Rajeev Gupta, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner’s counsel absent. Mr. B.D.Upadhyaya, Advocate for the respondents. 2. Mr. B.D. Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging his suspension has now become infructuous as during the pendency of the petition, the petitioner’s services were terminated and the said order of termination was modified in the writ petition filed by the petitioner against his termination. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 03.03.2006 A