HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON’BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Writ Apneal No.248 of 2008 Appeal under Section 2 of Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Rules, 2006 read with Rule 158 110) of the Chhattisqarh Hiqh Court Rules 2007 Present : Shri Ashish Shrivastava, counsel for the appellant. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Additional Advocate General for the State/ respondents No.1 to 4. ' ‘ Shri Vivek Verma, counsel for respondent No.5. ORDER - (5m February, 2010) /\ Appeuant Smt Jharna Acharya, 49 RespondentNo.5 Shashank Acharya, aged about Tehsil years, resident of Bacheli, Dantewada, District South Bastar, Chhattisgarh VERSUS Respondents State of Chhattisgarh, Through Welfare Respondent No.1 Secretary, Tribal Department, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Respondent No.2 2 Colteotor, South Bastar, Dantewada,~ District South Bastar, Chhattisgarh RespondentNo.3 3 Assistant Commissioner, Tribai Weifare Department, South Bastar, Dantewada, Chhattisgarh RespondentNo.4 4 Block Education Officer, Block Kuankonda, District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh Petitioner 5 Smt Savita Nair‘ Head Mistress, Middle School, Bade Hadmamunda, Block Kuakonda, District South ‘ Bastar, Chhattisgarh Subbu " w.K“ W- €w ‘ a, WW w («WW _ ’ -»r r _ ’ :Wtfw _ w {g}; The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri Ashish Shrivastava, learned counsel for the appellant, in View of developments after filing of the writ appeal, seeks permission to withdraw the writ appeal, with the liberty of tiling another writ petition for redressal of the appellant’s grievances, if the future developments so warrant. 2) Permission granted. 3) With the above liberty, the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. [III g’dF/f Chief Justice ‘ Sum! . Km“ S‘“ ‘ ha J“dge i Jllrdrge /