IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 31ST JULY 2007 / 9TH SRAVANA 1929 WA.No. 1745 of 2007() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.13347/2003 Dated 02/06/2006 .................... APPELLANT: RESPONDENTS: -------------------------------------- 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, NEW DELHI. 2. OFFICER IN-CHARGE RECORDS, MADRAS ENGINEER GROUP, P.B.NO.4201, BANGALORE. BY ADV. SRI.V.JAYAPRADEEP RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER: --------------------------------------- P. KRISHNAN KUTTY, S/O. PADMANABHA PILLAI, AGED 63 YEARS, UDAYABHAVAN, UDIYANKULANGARA, AMARAVILA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SRI.VARGHESE PREM THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ. =============================== W.A. NO. 1745 OF 2007 ====================== Dated this the 31st day of July, 2007 J U D G M E N T Radhakrishnan, J. When the matter came up for hearing, counsel for the respondent brought to our knowledge the order passed by this court in Con.Case(C) No.1335 of 2006, wherein there is a reference to a Fax message received from the Defence Ministry stating that the judgment has been complied with. We therefore find no reason to entertain this appeal. However, we make it clear that the findings entered by the learned Judge, would not be treated as a precedent. Writ appeal is disposed of as above. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp