!'^"i 'f""^ HiGH_COURTOFJUD!CATURECHHATTISGARU_LBil.ASPUI SINGLE BI 10.334 OF 'ETITIONER B ! '-s. RESPONDEh J^iWElg.t 2. Smt. Gulabl Bai Budek, W/o Late Shri Tularam Budek, Aged around 52 years, Occupation - House Wlfe, Residina at: 'atarapali, SARAIPALi, (Post & Tehsil) District: .Mahasamund (CG) of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Ministry of Home, Government of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S.Bhawan, RAIPUR - (CG) The Director General of Pollce, Poiice Head Quarters Chhattisgarh Po!ice, RAiPUR - (CG) The inspector General of Poiice, Sarguja Range, SARGUJA - (CG) The Superintendenr of Police, Balrampur District, BALRAMPUR - (CG) Present : ?v1r. Uttam Pandey, learned counsel for th®petitioner. Mr. Utkarsh Verma, Deputy Govsmment Advocat' fortne rasDondsnte/State. ;K i.rfi" iry =sj? Ti The petltioner !s the mother of one Late Shri Lalit Budek. At the relevant of time, he was Constable in She Police Department and he was kllled in an encounter wlth naxalites on 8-1-2005. tt is stated that on 22-7-2004, the Director General of PoSlce, Chhattisgarh declared on behalf of the State Government that the Police Personnel, Sf they are kilied in sncountsrs in Naxsiite affected areas, the insuranos covsrage would be enhanced from Rs.2 Lakhs to Rs.10 Lakhs, but, in terms of the abova assurance, no payment is made- St appears that, in that regard, the 1'a -2-- ^, petltioner made a representation on 17-4-2005 marked as Annexure P-3 to respondents No.3 and 4 for payment of the enhanced Insurana smount, but, respondents No.3 and 4 have not responded to that representation. Under the cireumstance, the pet'rtioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution seelting intervention of the Court. >ince st is the reguest of the jaetitioner to dirsct resDondents No.3 ana' 4 to oonsider her represaniation, thare is no naed for me to consider the merit of the claim put forth by the petitioner and that cannot be done also because othsr side has yef to fiie reply to the writ petition- In vi8W cf the matter, 1 dispose of the writ petitlon directing respondents No.3 and 4 to consider and dispose of the representatlon of the petltioner dated 17-4-2005 marked as Annexure p-3, if not already done, wlthin a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order, costs. Sd/- S.R. Nayak Chief Justice Q.Singh