... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8082 OF 2000 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8082 OF 2000 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8082 OF 2000 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2236 OF 2006 FIRST APPEAL NO.2236 OF 2006 FIRST APPEAL NO.2236 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Mrs G.P.Mulekar, A.G.P for the Applicant. Shri S.S.Hardikar for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : JANUARY 09, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 09, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 09, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned A.G.P for the State. The challenge in the First Appeal is to the Judgment and Award dated 31st August, 1996 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, Pune in a reference under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. For a period of more than ten years there is no interim relief operating in favour of the Applicant. Hence, no case is made out for grant of interim relief. Application is rejected. It is made clear that withdrawal of the compensation amount by the Respondents will be subject to final outcome of the Appeal. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE