1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR J U D G M E N T S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1180 of 2010. Shankar BhawanGrah Nirman Sehkari Samiti Limited VERSUS Smt. Gayatri Sharma wife of Shri B.S. Sharma and Others Date of Judgment :::: 27th January, 2010. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr. Sudesh Bansal, Counsel for the Petitioner. *** By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order dated 04.12.2009 by which the application submitted by the defendant-petitioner for setting aside the order, allowing the proceedings to be taken ex-parte and dismissing the application submitted by the petitioner for allowing the petitioner to file the written-statement has been rejected. In the instant case, the service upon the defendant- petitioner had been affected way back in the year 2006, though, the defendant-petitioner was served through administrator of the Society. In August, 2008 the elections to the Society were held and in place of the administrator the 2 elected Board representatives took charge of the Society. Even then the representatives, who are now coming forward to contest the suit did not come forward for seeking any relief from the Court for setting aside ex-parte order for more than a year and it is only in November, 2009 that the present application has come to be filed for setting aside the order. I have perused the impugned order. The learned trial Court has given cogent reason for dismissing the application and in the instant case it cannot be said that the order passed is without jurisdiction. In the facts and circumstances, the writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is accordingly dismissed. (Dalip Singh), J. Ashok/