BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR I.C.C.NO. 6^/2011 Sinflla Benck1 ^ fArisina Out of M.C.C. N0. 382 And W.P.No.38/2002 1 /2011 APPLICANTS Petitloners /' ^ ..f' ;. „ (;v-\ \./''"\:'ss- ..••'"'' ^^ €€'^' "^/^ NC^i-APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS ^" J-.-'Chhattisgarh Beverages Private Limited, Urla Industrial Complex, Raipur, represented by Vaibhav Jaipuria Director, 2.^ Vaibhav Jaipuria, Balraj Marg, 50 Dhantoli, Nagpur. VERSUS l.,/ State of Chhattisgarh through ^ Secretary, Commercial Tax Departnnent (Vanijivik Kar Vibhag, Raipur (C.G.) 2., Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Raipur (C.G.). .3. Additional Commissioner, Commercial r Tax, Raipur (C.G.) .4; Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Chhattisgarh, Raipur. ,5. Commercial Tax Officer cum-Additional Tahsildar, Raipur Circle-III. -'6. General Manger, District Industries - Centre, Raipur (C.G.) APPLICATmN FOR RESTORATION OF. MCC N0 382/2011, ^. ~..^ DISMISSED ON^2J07,2011 FOR WANTOF PROSECUTION. a^^'W^iW '^V 3TI^T^hw^ »<•»' ueept; ^ST •<<l'4ld'y, ®Ti1<Lili<o,fs)diy^< .M.t^r..^5..'...^.?..1?.!.!.! 3f!^l. 'TSRT ('yi'i^'i^) TOiRR^ato'CT^ff cbl<4ifl^l ^lH^t ^f fel<lt if^i^K ^sffim sii^i SB : Mon'bie Shri NianinQra mon^nsnrivastava. Shri N.K.Vyas, counsel for t|ie applicants. ynn KaKesn jna. uepuw y on advance copy. Meard on I.A.NO.I , appncatij overnment Advocate for the State/respondents sn for condonatton of deiay in filing M.C.C. Considering the grounds uffied in the appiication, the aelay in niing lV!.t-;.u. •s conQonecs. t-ieara on prayerTor restoraifon. Takina into consideration !the arounds which have been urged in tne appiication, it appears that non-appearance of the counsel was not intennonai ana sunicient cause nas Deen snown. Therefore, the order of disi|nissai dated 22/07/2011 is hereby recaiied and the M.C.C. No.382/2011 is restore Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivast Judge ava fm'S\v Wv yiwwii, n<?; i'i"<» -i s;] 4ft—2/201i—i,50,ooo.'''