IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.924 of 2010 RAMASHIS RAI & ORS. Versus JAI LAL SAH ----------- 05/ 23.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. This petition has been filed by the petitioners for restoration of C.R.No.222 of 2008 which was dismissed for default due to non-compliance of order dated 10.12.2009 by which one week peremptory time was allowed to the petitioners to file requisites for issuance of notice by both processes to the sole opposite party. Considering the averments made by learned counsel for the petitioners and the statements made in the petition, it appears that genuine reasons have been shown which prevented the petitioners from complying the said order. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and C.R.No.222 of 2008 is restored to its original file. However, this order will be subject to compliance of the said order dated 10.12.2009 within one week from today. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)