WP(C) 498/2008 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. K. Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Ms. R . Chakraborty, learned State Counsel for the respondents. According to the petitioners, they are in occupation of the particular p lot of land covered by Dag No. 279 and 280. As per the statement made in paragra ph 4 of the writ petition, the said Dag Nos. comprised of 100 Bighas of land and the Transport Department, Government of Assam is in occupation of about 70 Bigh as of land with the boundary walls. It is the case of the petitioners that they are outside the said boundary walls and are in occupation of the land for the la st several years. It is the apprehension of the petitioners that they might be evicted wit hout following the due process. Ms. Chakraborty, learned State Counsel submits t hat if the petitioners are in illegal occupation of Government land, the Governm ent is entitled to evict them in accordance with law. In view of the above and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the par ties, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents that in t he event of any necessity to evict the petitioners, the respondents may do so by following due procedure, in other words, the petitioners may not be evicted wit hout following the due process. Writ petition is disposed of.