1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI.REVISION APPLN. NO.123 OF 2007 (EKNATH SHRIPAD INGLE...Vs.. GOPAL PURNAJI UNDIRWADE & ANR.) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Shri J.B.Kasat, Advocate for Applicant. Shri R.D.Wakode, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Smt. A.R.Taiwade, A.P.P. for Respondent/ State. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : DECEMBER 17, 2008. 1. Both, the applicant as well as respondent No.1, have filed joint purshish, which is duly attested by their respective counsel. They are present in the Court. They state that they have reached the compromise. Respondent No.1 Gopal Purnaji Undirwade, who is original complainant in respect of the complaint for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, states that he has no grievance now. 2. In view of this, composition of offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is allowed. The impugned order, convicting the applicant, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Amravati and confirmed on appeal by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati, is set aside. 2 6. The revision application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE RR.