IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FA No.85 of 1990 Allahabad Bank Versus Firm Harnarain Raj Narain & Ors. ----------- 14. 18.07.2011. Heard the learned counsel, Sri Ajay Kumar Singh, appearing on behalf of the appellant, i.e., Allahabad Bank and the learned counsel, Sri Ambuj Nayan Chaubey appearing on behalf of the respondents. This First Appeal has been filed for realization of loan advance to the respondent. During the pendency of this Appeal, there has already been compromise between the parties and according to the said terms, the respondent has already deposited compromise amount. An application has been filed being I.A. No.4380 of 2011 on behalf of the respondent in support of the fact that the compromise amount has already been deposited with the bank also. The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that since the amount has already been deposited, therefore, the bank may be directed to release the security in favour of the respondents. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant- Allahabad Bank did not raise any objection to the fact 2 that the compromise amount has already been deposited by the respondents. In fact, the learned counsel submitted that he has also got oral instruction from the Allahabad Bank that the settlement amount has already been deposited by the respondents which is evidenced by Annexure ‘B’ and ‘C’ to the interlocutory application. In view of the above facts and circumstance of the case, this First Appeal is disposed of in terms of the settlement between the parties as contained in Annexure ‘A’ to the interlocutory application. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)