^, !€N c^? \<fyt- IN THE HON^BLE mGH COVRT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR c5$^i Writ Petition (Cr)-^^^'/20t0 PETITIONER ^*;^ ^^^€:-- ,^^)s-" ^•"" ^ RESPONDENTS VERSUS '^5^%S?^ /< ^- ^^-%^ yyg^ G.V.ChaIpati Rao S/o LateShri G.L.N.Swami aged about 66years R/o Keshar*26,Rajkisohre Nagar Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ^ 1. State ofChhattisgarhThrough Department ofHome D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) 2. Collector Bilaspur(C.G) 3. Sant Kumar S/o Late Shri Muni Raj, R/o Rajkishore Nagar Tulshi Awas 6/57, P.0. Speening MU1, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETTTION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITimON OF INDIA ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cr.) N0.2808 OF 2010 PETITIONER G.V. Chalpati Rao Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others RESPONDENT p (Writ Petition underArticle 227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- None for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. General for the State. Shri J.S. Pandey, Advocate for the respondent No.3. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 29th day of June,2011) 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Perused the record. 3. Case of the petitioner is that after the death of one Smt. Gujarati, who belongs to hlindu religion, instead of performing the funerals as per Hindu rituals, the respondent No.3 concealed the fact of death of Smt. Gujarati and disposed ofthe dead body. 4. Though the petition is sketchy and does not disclose all the factsin order to come to a definite conclusion, however, the respondent No.2/Collector, Bilaspur, is directed to look into the grievances of the petitioner and take necessary steps, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Gowri SatishK.Agnihom Judge