IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP-T No. 11215/2008 Decided on:23.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Pushpa Upreti. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Ansul Bansal, Asstt. A.G. for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Varun Chandel, Advocate vice Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Asstt. Solicitor General of India for respondent No.5. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). It is jointly represented by the learned counsel for the parties that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Hira Lal versus State of Himachal Pradesh, CWP No. 319/2007 decided on 17.6.2008 reported in 2008 Supp. C.L.J. 426. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Annexure A-15 dated 14.10.2003 is quashed and set aside. Recoveries, if any, made from the petitioner shall be refunded to him with interest @ 9% per annum. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 23.12.2010 *awasthi*