IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 1ST MARCH 2010 / 10TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 5561 of 2010(U) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ P.T.SURESH KUMAR, S/O. T.PALLIYAN, AGED 44 YEARS, SENIOR ASSISTANT, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CHIEF OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL SMT.AMBIKA RADHAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SRI.V.V.N.NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 5561 OF 2010 (U) ===================== Dated this the 1st day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is presently working as Senior Assistant in the KSRTC. It is stated that in the matter of his promotion to the post of Senior Assistant, his claim was overlooked and that his promotion was therefore delayed. Now by Ext.P1, Corporation has initiated steps for making further promotions to the post of Superintendents from among Senior Assistants. According to the petitioner, if the anomaly that occurred in his promotion to the post of Senior Assistant is rectified, he is entitled to be considered for promotion earlier than many of the persons mentioned in Ext.P1. 2. From the facts as noticed above, it is therefore evident that firstly what is required to be done is that the grievance of the petitioner in the matter of his promotion to the post of Senior Assistant should be looked into by the 1st respondent. The petitioner can have any further grievance in the matter of promotion to the post of Superintendents only after getting the alleged anomaly rectified. WPC No. 5561/10 :2 : Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp