IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44720 of 2010 NARAD MAHTO S/O SRI VIDYA MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the informant and the state. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 498 A, 301B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner’s wife died due to unfortunate circumstances and a death certificate was also issued in this regard in Gujrat, where after, on suspicion the present case was instituted by the parents at Bettiah. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah in connection with Bairiya P.S. Case No. 138/2010, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how 2 he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)