IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6489 of 2010 AMARJEET SAHANI @ AMARJEET KUMAR SAHANI, SON OF SRI LAL BABU SAHANI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SITA CHAK, POLICE STATION-DHANARUA, DISTRICT-PATNA. ………………………………………………………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Manish Kumar No.2, A.P.P. For the Informant: Mr. Chandrakant, Advocate. ---------- 3. 3.5.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the complaint Petition, which was sent for investigation under Section 156(3) to the concerned Police Station, however, it is submitted that the victim girl was examined under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and she has stated that the petitioner had taken her to Siwan by motorcycle and to Patna by bus and thereafter to Jehanabad. She has also stated that the petitioner was known to him. Learned counsel submits that 2 actually there was love affair between the petitioner and the girl. Had there been any kidnapping by the petitioner, the girl had an ample opportunity to raise alarm as she had allegedly been taken by the petitioner by public transport. Girl had been medically examined in which she has been assessed as 19 years, however, the court has assessed her age to be 18 years. Learned counsel for the informant submitted that the girl is minor, which would be apparent from the certificate. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Amarjeet Sahani @ Amarjeet Kumar Sahani, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, in connection with Fulwaria P.S. Case No.101/2009. It goes without saying that if the petitioner violates the terms and conditions of the bail granted to him, the concerned court would be at liberty to take appropriate steps for cancellation of his bail. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)