IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9892 of 2010 BINDESHWAR MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 19.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that though there is allegation about torture for demand but complainant herself left the petitioner’s house, deserted him and now married one Pulkit Mahto. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, District Madhubani in C.R. No. 524 of 2006, corresponding to T.R. No. 1367 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)