IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2941 of 2007 SMT. BASANTI BASKHORIN @ SMT. BASANTI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4. 24.6.2009 The petitioner alleges violation of the order dated 21.7.2004, by which general direction was issued in a large number of cases for payment of retiral dues. In the show cause filed by the Municipal Commissioner of the Gaya Municipal Corporation, it is stated that all the admitted dues of the petitioner have already been paid, details of which are mentioned in the said show cause itself. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Corporation has accepted revised pay scale for its retired employees but the arrears of pension, etc. on the basis of revised pay scale have not yet been paid to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the Gaya Municipal Corporation states that no retired employee of the Corporation is being paid any pension on the basis of the revised pension scheme nor such arrear has been paid to any of them and, accordingly, whenever such amount shall be paid to the other retired employees, the same benefit would be extended to the petitioner also. In the above circumstances, no case for contempt is made out and the application is, accordingly, dismissed. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.)