IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Revn. No. 38 of 2011 ( O&M ) DATE OF DECISION : 19.04.2011 Ram Sarup .... PETITIONER Versus Pankaj Pawar and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. JEYAPAUL Present: Mr. K.L. Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) Ram Sarup (complainant), uncle of deceased Ritu, has filed this revision petition against the judgment dated 22.3.2010, passed by the court of Additional Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, whereby the respondents No.1 and 2 have been acquitted of the charge under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, in alternative under Sections 304-B and 498- A read with Section 34 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner states since the instant revision petition is not maintainable, therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appeal, if necessary, because the appeal filed by the State of Haryana against the aforesaid Crl. Revn. No. 38 of 2011 ( O&M ) -2- judgment has already been admitted by this Court. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE April 19, 2011 ( M. JEYAPAUL ) ndj JUDGE