hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8421 OF 2009 Maharashtra Shikshan Sanstha, Pen ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. A.M. Joshi for Petitioner. Mr. V.S. Masurkar, G.P. For R. Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. A.A. Garge for R. No. 3. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & K.K. TATED JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 11, 2009 P.C. Heard parties. The learned counsel informs us that the enquiry was completed on 10.12.2009. Pending the enqury the Petitioner was suspended. Under Rule 37F of the M.E.P.S. Rules the suspension can be for the period of 120 days. That can be extended with prior approval. We are informed that 60 days additional time was granted. The grievance of the Respondent No. 4 teacher is that by the deeming provision of Rule 37F of the M.E.P.S. Act on completion of the said period of 180 days, he is deemed to be in employment and entitled to full wages. He has not been paid full wages. The Petitioner Management has approached this court seeking to continue the Petitioner under suspension. We do not propose to go into the controversy. However, in our opinion, considering the special circumstances and facts of the case and as the enquiry has now been completed, suspension can continue till such time the final order is passed. In the meantime, the following order : The Petitioners will pay the Respondent No. 3, full wages after completion of 180 days from the first date of suspension. The wages will be paid within 15 days from today. If the Petitioner is entitled to grants from department, they can apply for the same and the department to consider the same according to law. With the above observations, petition disposed of. (K.K. TATED, J.) (F,I. REBELLO,J.)