IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-20602 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 22, 2011 Dharampal & others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Vikrant Rana, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Anupam Sharma, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Ms. Shiwani Verma, Advocate, with Mr. Mani Ram Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. prays for quashing FIR No.109 dated 30.4.2009 under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, Police Station, Badhara, District Bhiwani and consequent proceedings. 2. At the outset, it has been pointed out on behalf of the respondent-State that after lodging of the impugned FIR, investigation was concluded. Petitioners have been nominated as Crl. Misc. No. M-20602 of 2010 [2] accused. Charges against them have already been framed for commission of offence under Sections 420, 467, 471 IPC on 21.4.2010. It has further been pointed out that case was fixed for recording prosecution evidence on 7.9.2011. 3. I have considered the issue of quashing of FIR. 4. After registration of FIR, investigation has been undertaken under Chapter XII of the Code of Criminal Procedure. During investigation, certain material and evidence would have been collected against the petitioners, without consideration of which, adjudication on the issue of quashing of proceedings is not possible. Infact, on consideration of the material placed before the Trial Court alongwith report under Section 173 Cr.P.C, even charges have been framed. Order of charge and chargesheet have not been challenged. In such circumstances, no proper adjudication is possible. 5. I have also considered the fact that Trial Court is seized of the matter and at this stage, in peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, by way of taking evidence in the shape of affidavit and counter affidavit, it cannot be held that offence has not been committed. 6. The petition is accordingly dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) September 22, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?