IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA SECOND APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2011 SMT. SEBASTIANA VAZ, REP. BY DULY CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY MR. ROSARIO F. RODRIGUES ... Appellant Versus MRS. CALORINA BRAGANZA ... Respondent Mr.P. Vengurlekar,advocate for the appellant. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 25th February, 2011 P.C: Heard Mr. Vengurlekar, learned counsel for the appellant. By this Second appeal, the appellant challenges the judgment and decree dated 31/8/2010 passed by the District Judge-I, Mapusa in Regular Civil Appeal no.102/2010 dismissing the appeal preferred against the judgment and decree dated 13/1/2010 passed by the Civil Judge Junior Division, Panaji in Regular Civil Suit no.81/98/B/C field by the appellant. 2. The appellant is the plaintiff in the above suit filed against the respondents seeking relief of declaration and injunction. The plaintiff claimed right of way of through the property of the defendants. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant, I find that no case has been made out for interference with the impugned decrees passed against the appellant in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 100 of C.P.C. There are concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below against the plaintiff. Moreover, in the plaint itself the plaintiff except for making reference to the dimensions of the alleged way has not annexed any plan or sketch. 4. This being the position, I find that no case is made out for interference with the impugned decrees. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ap/-