MC 2632/2007 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CR SARMA The arguments have remained inclusive. Mr. AK Bhattacharjee, Senior Advocate for the applicant in WA No. 311/2004, wit hout prejudice to the submissions made on the legal aspects involved has emphasi sed on the necessity, having regard to the singular nature of the issues involve d to explore the possibility of mutually acceptable norms for the resolution of the debate bearing in mind the religious institution involved. He has further dr awn the attention of this Court to the order dated 07.03.2003 passed in WP(C) No .5385/2000, evidencing a similar endeavour through a Board of Conciliators, whic h according to the learned Senior Counsel did not fructify. Mr. Bhattacharjee, h as submitted that though, thereby an amount of Rs. 50,000/-, was required to be deposited by the Government of Assam, the same has not yet been done. When queried by this Court, the learned counsel for the respondents, though not wholly averse to the possibility of a mutually acceptable resolution, have stres sed upon the necessity of a serious reflection on various relevant aspects havin g a bearing thereon. The learned counsel for the parties, in the above premise, would make an endeavo ur in this regard and apprise this Court of the developments on the next date fi xed. Mr. AC Buragohain, learned Addl. Advocate General, Assam, seeks time to obtain i nstructions as to whether the amount as ordered has already been deposited or no t. He may do so by the next date fixed. In case, the amount has not been deposited, it would be so done by then without fail. The Registry of this Court would also ascertain, whether any such amount had bee n deposited with it as a direction to that effect is contained in the order date d 07.03.2003 and submit its report by the next date fixed. List again on 15th of February, 2011. A copy of this order be furnished to Mr. Buragohain so as to enable him to do th e needful.