1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.182 OF 2010 Vishwas R. Chopde & Ors. ...Applicants. v. Moti D. Irani & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.Sachin S. Punde, adv. For the Applicants. Mr.J.S.KIni i/by Suresh Dubey, advs. For the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : MARCH 17, 2010 P.C. 1 Respondents filed regular civil suit no.112 of 2005 in the Court of Small Causes on the ground that the defendants had failed to pay rent for the month of December, 2004 and January, 2005 as well as property tax from the year 1992. Defendants, who are the revision applicants before this Court, contended that they have already paid property tax to the Cantonment Board. After going through the record, both the Courts below came to conclusion that defendants had not paid property tax and the receipts which were produced by them did not pertain to the property tax. After going through the relevant part of the oral evidence and the admissions given by the defendants as well as contents of the documents produced before the trial Court as well as 2 before the Appellate Court under Order 41 Rule 27, I do not find any illegality, irregularity in the findings of the Courts below. There is concurrent findings of both the Courts below that the defendants had failed to pay permitted increases i.e., the property tax and, therefore, they are liable to vacate the premises. In view of these circumstances, I do not find any reason to interfere in the concurrent findings. In the result, Civil Revision Applications stands dismissed. 2 At this stage, the learned counsel for the tenants/revision applicants seeks indulgence of this Court in giving time to vacate the premises. He makes a statement that the tenants would vacate the premises by the end of December, 2010 and they are willing to file undertaking to that effect within two weeks from this date. The learned counsel for the landlords/respondents has no objection to the same. Therefore, the defendants/revision applicants are allowed to vacate the premises till the end of 31st December, 2010 subject to their filing undertaking before this Court within two weeks to that effect and also to the effect that they would not create any third party rights and clear all the arrears of the rent and permitted increases, if any and they shall also continue to pay rent till the December, 2010. They shall hand over the vacant possession of the premises to the plaintiffs without any 3 obstructions. 3 Civil Revision Application does not survive and stands disposed off accordingly. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)