: 1 : REVN-89-11=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 89 OF 2011 IN FAMILY PETITION NO.E-88 OF 2005 Dinesh Kumar Vitthal Gurav .. Applicant v/s. Mrs. Rekha Dinesh Gurav .. Respondent ......... Ms. A.B. Kologi for the applicant ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 17th MARCH, 2011 P.C. : 1. The respondent herein filed an application for maintenance in the Family Court at Bandra being Petition No.E-88 of 2005. The learned Judge of the Family Court by order dated 5th July, 2007 granted the said application and ordered the petitioner to pay monthly maintenance @ Rs.1,000/- per month to the respondent from the date of the petition. Costs of Rs.1,000/- were also awarded. The petitioner husband has challenged this order dated 5th July, 2007. : 2 : REVN-89-11=.sxw 2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner took me through the record and tried to submit that the learned Judge has arrived at the income figure improperly and she has not considered the stand of the petitioner that the income of the petitioner was Rs.2,000/- 3. In so far as this aspect is concerned, the petitioner has not in clear terms stated his total income from all sources and the profession or the job which he was carrying and is presently carrying. Learned Judge has considered the record and has arrived at a proper figure of the maintenance to be awarded to Respondent, of course based on the income of the petitioner. According to me on the the basis of the record and the impugned order, this is not a case where this Court should interfere in the Revisional jurisdiction of this Court. In view of this, petition is dismissed at the state of admission. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)