IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 231 OF 2000 THOMAS E.P.VAZ ....Petitioner Versus MR. LICURGO JACQUES ....Respondent Mr. C.A.coutinho, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.V. Kamat, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. Date:- 4th October, 2006 P.C. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the respondent. Learned Counsel for the respondent categorically states that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. In view thereof the matter has become infructuous. Hence Rule stands discharged. DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ef.