IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-32267 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 2, 2010 Hira Lal and another .....Petitioners v. State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Surender Deswal, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to the respondents to decide the pending premature release application of petitioners, dated 12.9.2010, which was submitted by them in the office of respondent no.4. Heard. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that case of petitioners for their premature release is to be decided as per ratio of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in State of Haryana and others v. Jagdish and another AIR 2010 SC 1690, and as per the instructions prevalent on the date of conviction of the petitioners, and however, no action has been taken on the same by the respondents so far. Further contended that petitioners have already undergone more than 13 years of actual sentence, whereas as per policy they are required to undergo ten years of actual sentence. Hence, in view of these facts and as per request, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider and decide the application of the petitioners, dated 12.9.2010, already stated to have been moved before respondent no.4, as per law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in Jagdish Singh's case (supra) within one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 2.11.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge