HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Wiit Petition (S) N0. L952 0f2009 PETITEONER M.V.V. Prasada Rao, S/o late Shri M. Parankusa Das, Aged about 62 yeaxs, R/o House No. 1-8-1/1, Ravindra Nagar Colony, Street No. 8, Habsiguda, Hyderabad (AR). VERSUS 1. Food Corporation of India, through Managing Director, Head Quarter-New Delhi, 16-20 Baraldlamba Lane. New Deltii. 2. The Executive Director, Food Corporation oflndia, Dhiraj Alma Buiiding, Near Anant Kanekar Police Station, Bandra (East) Mumbai-40005 1. 3. The General Manager, Food Corporation of India, Ring Road Chouraha, Telibandha, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. The Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, Madeena Building, Jail Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5. The Employees ProvidentFund Organization, Through- Commissioner, Regional Oiiice, 8 & 9m Floor, Mayur Bhawan, Connaught Circus, New Delhi—l. (WRIT'PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotl'i, J.) Fresent : Sliri Pankaj Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Roshan Dubey, Advocate, appears on behalf of Shri B.P. Gupta, Advocate for the respondent No. 1 to 4. RESPONDENTS ORAL ORDLR (Passed on 2911‘ day of February, 2%9) l. With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merits except that the petitioner be permitted ' to make a representation in terms ofthe order dated 24. 10.2007 passed by this court in ‘W.P.(S) No. 6236/07 (it? Sahu Vs. Food Cmporation of India & Others). 1,. ’ Thakur 3. Shri Roshan Dubey, Learned counsel appearing for respondent No. l to 4 have no obj ection. 4. The petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms as under: "Accordingly, it is directed that if so advised, the petitioner may file a demiled represematioa before respondent Nokl a'iong with a copy of this ‘or&er and a copy of the Wn't l’etition within a period of three weeks from today and if such a representation is filed and the concerned documents ofthe petitioner have not been forwarded by the respondent No. i to respondent No. 5, respondent No. 1, in turn: shall examine the points raised by the petitioner and forward the papers reiating to the gension ofthe petitioner to respondent No. 5 within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of the said representation or shail dispose ofthe representation in accordance with law within the said period. in case, the concerned documents ofthe petitioner are already forwarded, this order shall carry no forc‘L i t Sd/- " Satish K. Agnihotri t Judge