IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 573 OF 2009 (MS) Sanjay Arya …..Petitioner. Versus Assistant Registrar Firm Society and Chits, Haridwar and others. …….Respondents. Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl.Chief Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand / respondent no. 1. 21st April, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. This is the writ petition, which is liable to be dismissed at the very threshold. The petitioner has prayed that he may be allowed to cast vote in a private club i.e. a Press Club. Such a prayer cannot be granted by this Court in a writ petition. No public law remedy is available to the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the grievance he is agitating in the present writ petition. The writ petition is not maintainable and is dismissed in limine. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 21.4.2009 Rathour