IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTTSGARH AT BILASPUR M.A. No. 3°f /200^ Itlsfall B@p^t^ APPELLANT ^LAIMANT 'MoharBai, Widow of Netram Satnami Aged about 52 years, Occupation-Labour, R/o. Village Madribhata (Faguram) Tehsil Malkhaurada, P.S. Dabhara, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT I^ON-APPLICANT / ^''"'""A'S^ A^-" ^w ./M'\\^ <^/yf> ^y Niranjan Lal Jindal, S/o.Kundan Lal Jindal, Aged about 42 years, Occupation Business, Owner of Jai Bharat Rice Mill, In front of Panchmukhi Hanuman Temple, Dabhara Road, Kharsiya, R/o. Kharsiya, Tahsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh (C.G.) APPEAL U/S. 30 OF WORKSMEN COMPENSATION ACT -"»> ^wr^TRirePT, v-alwKo, RoiNti^ ^).A- ^^>. "^o/ *II*ICTI ^^TT^ 3TT^9T q^cf? (i^lijelc^) ^20<3^ 3TT^^Tci5Tf^iro ^RTTW^^T^b^Jch ^-^ Kvr g^ITW^rf^TSTT^^T S.B. Hon'bSe Shri Justice N.K. Aaarwal 24-02-2010 None for the appeilant. The matter Is caited twic^ appears nor any representati^ appeilant. It seems that the apd prosecuting the matter, Accordlngly, the appeai i's cpiqIo<T|<1 +11+1C$T:ffI^L£l<<Rl^$IX ^3rf^T3TT^^T ». On both occasions, none >n is made on behaif of the >eiiant may not be interested in |disrnjssed for non-prosecutlon. Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge ^"