IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR Cr.’A.No. x i t _ Vishal Jain aliasPinttLaged 20 years. son 0f Go‘pal' Prasad' Jain,resident of- Baijnathpara. behlnd Bombay Drying , Ralpur, Tahsil and Distrlct RalpuKM. P. WNMV M Ayyellant . Accused 1 I 1 (In Jail) ‘~g ‘ § l ‘1‘ R‘éspondeni: , WE} 1 ‘?é(t,7gr l QM m « *m-mmmmwmmw—u Ly 5m .4» M Aw“- ' ‘ w.,;c».... w m. AJvocele ' > ‘ \ ‘ I CONVICTI ON : u[s 307 Linc. M— mam I \ \ vn‘ \u<( “HHH lllllllHHlHlH ll\l CFDOOOO '@ Smge Bench (krmm‘H 3f\ 30 of 1998 ' x Versu S The $tate of Madhya Pradesh -.-. SENTENCE: ‘R.I.£or ten years,an<i fine Rs.3doe/- . in‘defeult of payment ofr fine, additional R.I.f0r'onetyear.. ’ .-o CRIMINAL APPEIL UNDER SECTION 374 (2) OF THE CGDE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.1973 31m? was ‘ . Q‘XANelqqgJ 1:1 2 q% I WW .m, f mm WW mm mmmm ‘ f“ 1 i E 15-03-2002 1 Heatrl Shn' Arun Kochar leanled counsel for the a’ppellant and Shrj} Ranbir Singh, learned Govt: Advocate for the State. u f Mr. Singh, counsel appeaiing . for the State submittcd that he has reéeived a Fetter from police station Kotwali, Raipur along, with the death certiflcate o the appellant Vishal @ Pint1 stating that he died on 15~ 01-2000. He has producec the report and the dea certificate along with th memo. This fact is n disputed by the counsel f0 the appellant. Hence th appeal has abated and it i dismissed as such, “/ } {slaw