1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05/04/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN Writ Petition (MD) No.3967 of 2011 S.Sebastian S/o.Sabariar Door No.73, North Street, Muthalagupatti Post Dindigul District-624 002 ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary to Government Animal Husbandry & Fisheries Department Fort St. George, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner of Milk Production, and Dairy Development Department Nehruji Nagar, 63/B4 Dindigul District 624 001 3.The Deputy Registrar (Dairy) Dindigul Dindigul District. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 19.08.2009 after giving him an opportunity of being heard within the time stipulated by this Court. For petitioner ...Mr.K.Nagarajan For Respondents ...Mr.N.Elango Government Advocate O R D E R Mr.N.Elango, Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondents. By consent of both sides, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 3. The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition for a mandamus directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 19.08.2009 after giving him an opportunity of being heard. 4. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as a Night Watchman in the office of the Deputy Registrar, (Diaries) Dindigul, in and by the proceedings dated 01.08.1997 by the Deputy Registrar (Diaries), Dindigul. He joined duty in the said office on 03.08.1997. From the said date, he has been serving as Night Watchman without any break whatsoever, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 but, however, his service has not been regularised till date. The petitioner, therefore, approached the respondents to regularise his service by relaxing the age qualification. However, the same was not considered and hence the petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition for the relief as stated above. 5. Considering the limited scope of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the claim made by the petitioner, I direct the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 19.08.2009, on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(Accounts) /True copy/ Assistant REgistrar To 1.The Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu, Animal Husbandry & Fisheries Department Fort St. George, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner of Milk Production, and Dairy Development Department Nehruji Nagar, 63/B4 Dindigul District. 3.The Deputy Registrar (Dairy) Dindigul, Dindigul District. +1 CC to Mr.K.Nagarajan, Advocate, SR.NO.12927 +1 C to the Special Government Pleader, SR.No.12700 RR W.P.(MD) No.3967 of 2011 05.04.2011 TR : 20.04.2011 : 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/