IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 12TH MARCH 2010 / 21ST PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 6972 of 2010(V) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RADHA.N., W/O.K.HARIDAS, AGED 42 YEARS, ANUGRAHA, ST.GUPTHA ROAD, OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.JOBY JACOB PULICKEKUDY SRI.ANIL GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, PALAKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. M.RAMACHANDRAN, MANAGING PARTNER DEEPA RESTAURANT, CHERPULASSERY, PALAKKAD. ADV. SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN FOR R3 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 6972 of 2010 V ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 12 th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner claims to the legal heir of late Radhakrishnan Nair, who was a partner of Deepa Restaurant, Cherpalachery, Palakkad. 2. In this writ petition, her grievance is that though she is entitled to be admitted as a partner of the firm, that request has not been allowed by the 3 rd respondent. Therefore, she made Ext.P2 representation to the 2 nd respondent, which also, according to her, remains unattended. 3. However, counsel for the 3 rd respondent points out that the issue of regularisation of the past re-constitution of the firm is pending consideration before the 1 st respondent, pursuant to the directions of this Court in judgment in W.P.(C) No.7055/2010. It is stated that once orders are passed on the said application, the request of the petitioner will be forwarded to the 1 st respondent for appropriate action. 4. In view of the submission made by the 3 rd respondent, I WPC.6972/2010 : 2 : feel that, at this stage, a direction as sought for is premature. In view of the stand taken by the 3 rd respondent as above, it is directed that once orders are passed by the Excise Commissioner, the request of the petitioner will be forwarded to the 1 st respondent for appropriate direction. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks