IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.12005 of 2005 Between: Puttur Gram Panchayat, Puttur, Chittoor District, rep. by its Sarpanch, D.Elumalai ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt. of A.P., rep., by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development (Pts.IV) Department Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner & Director, Municipal Administration, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The Collector & District Magistrate, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the letter Roc.No.1394/2001 A5(Pts) dated 14-2-2005 of the Collector and District Magistrate, Chittoor and as well as the Govt.Memo No.2380/Pts.IV/A1/2005-4 dated 24-5-2005 of the first respondent and after perusing the same, set aside them by declaring them as arbitrary, unjust and contrary to law and with all other consequential benefits and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.12005 of 2005 ORDER: Mr. Surendar, learned counsel, representing Mr. V. Jagapathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 1st June, 2009. IBL