r C^" t!yv> IN THE mOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) WRIT PETITION (S) N0. )2-^- /2Q09 7-- WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER .^XM&'-'r^-^-' ^^^ ^ Venudhar Ijardar, aged about 45 years, son of Shri Ramratan Ijardar, Assistant f*.0^ l Teacher, Govemment Primary School 1 b Dhanigaon, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (sl.no. 81 ofAimexiirep-1) VERSUS . RESPONDENTS'../y ly ^^ 0>y' ^••"".c^ 9?- ^^'.^' 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer - Raigarh (CG) SF ? PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER uauseJitl HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISfiARH AT BILASPUR T~' ~ W PfSrNo 123 cf 2007 1 Pe^itjoner : Ja9atpal Nikunj 1 Versus Respondents : State of Chhaf'iS9<xrh A another W. P.(S) No. 124 of 2007 Petitioner : Venudhar Ijardar Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-iS9arh &another W. P.fSl No. 125 of 2007 Petjtioner Ku. Jeevon Manju Xalxo (after marrktge Smt. JeevBn Monju Viswas) ; Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh A others WP.fSV No. 132 of 20)7 Petitioner : Clament Kertetta Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh & another W P(5)No. 138 of 2007 Petitioner ; Dilip SinghSidar Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh A another W. P.(51No. 143 of 2007 Peti^-ipner : Trilochan Ncsyak I \ Versus ' :. ResRondents : State of Chhaftisgarhd anotiwr W. P.(S) No. 144 of 2007 Ptetifioner : Kailadipati Nayak Versus Respondents : State of Gihatti^arh d another W. P.ffiyNo 146 of 2007 Petittoner : Roop Narayan Ram Versus Resppndents : State of Chhatt-isgarh A another W. P.(S1 No. 148 of 2007 Petitioner : Rqjkumar Patel Versus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh & another W. P.IS} No. 152 of 2007 Petitioner : Siyam Mohan Nayak Versus Respondents : Stateof ChhattiS9arh & ano-ther And W. P.(S) No. 160 of 2007 Pefitioner : Narendra Singh Nuyak j Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh & another 1: SB: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present: Shri A.N. Bhakta, Advocate for the petitioners (s). Mrs. Anju Ahuju, Deputy Sovernment Advocate, Mr. Arvind Oubey, Panel Lawyer, Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on this 17th Day of January, 2007) 1 ; ' ' '• : ^ '. The following order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agniholri. J. 1. Learned counset appearin9 for 1+ie petitioners flis well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts of the present writ petitions are similar to -that of in W. P. (S) No. 5473/2006 (RakeA Kumar Sharma & another vs. State of Chhatt'isgarh & others), which was dispospd of vide order dated 9.10.2006. They further aibmit that •the question of taw involved is also the same. 2. In view of the ubove-storted submissions nwde by learned courisel for the purties •these writ petitions qredisfwwdof m terms of •rtie order cfated 9.10.2006 passed by this Court in W. P. (5) No. 5473/2006 i! i .. ' • ' • . . ' • . ' I. . • ' • . • '• ' ' • ' (Rakedi Kunuu* 5harma A another vs. State of ChhaHisgarh A o'thers). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record, in connected matt'ers. 4- Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Subhash