^- Writ Petition No. 2382 of 2006 PeBtioner Ramesh Chandra Thrari ^ed - SS yeare, Son <rf Late Ramadhar Tw/ari Posted as - Upper Dhrision Teatsher, At -S.S. Kalibadi Hr. Sec. School, Kalibadi, Raipur, Disfrict - Raipur (C.G.) R/o Mukut Nagar, hfgah Bhatha, Raipur, DisWct - Raipur (C.G.) Versus Respondents The State of ChhatUsgarh Through- The Secrslary, School Edut^Uon DejMtttnent, Mantratoya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur The Director, Publtc tostnKtions, ChhatUsgarh htesd Qusater at - Raipur. The Govemhg Body of Katibadi Shiteha SamiU, Through-tts Schoot Secretary, S.S. Kall Badi Hr. Sec. School, Kalibadi, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETIT10N U/A - 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF 1NDIA 1. 2 3 SB: Hon'bte Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri Presenfc Mr. R.K. Kesharwani, Advocate forthe petitiCTier. Ms. Deepaii Pandey, Panel lawyerfw the rsspondente No. 1 and 2/State. ORDER (Passed on this 16nlday of^ml, 2007) The quesfion of law involwed herdn is whether the non-teaching staff woridng in Govemment aided school are entitted to tt®benefit of recoromendaBons of the Fitth Pay Commissfon under the prwi^ons ofttie Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Sikshan Sansttia (Adhyapakon Tatha Anya Karmchariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya) AdWnlyam, 1978 (henceforth •ttie Adhiniyam, 1978') and the rules made thereunder read wtth the Madhya Pradesh Revision of Pay Rules, 1988 (henceforth "Uie Pay Rules, 1988'). Leamed counsei appearir^i for Uie pefifioner submits that ttie temw and condifa'ons of the teaching and non-teaohing staff are govemed by the Thakur same provisions of taw which were under consideratton by this Court in the matter of Smt. A. Lall vs. State of ChhatBsgarh and ottier connecfsd matters (W.P. No. 4108 of 200^, wherein by the jialgment and order dated 6.2.2007, this Court hekt that Uie petitienere who are wiridng m lully Govemment aided private ^hods are entlUed to the revfeed pay-scales with effect from 1.1.1996 as prescribed under ttie Pay Rides, 1988. This Court further for the purpose of pa^nent cS arrears had granted certain direction. Admfttedly and jotntty, it is submitted by the parties ttiat this matter is squarely covered by tfie judgment and order datad 6.2.2007 passed by this Court in the case of Smt. A. Lall vs. State of Chhattisgarh and other connected mattsre (Supra). As a result, for ttie reasons steted in the ju<^ment and order dated 6.2.2007 passed in W.P. No. 4108 of 2005 (Smt. A. Lall vs. Stat®of Chhattisgarh and other connected mattare) (Supfa), the writ petition is allowed in the same terms and condiBons. -— Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge