IN THE HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(C)No 'S|2-iJ\/2010 •iKfiK^-c^ ^" y^^'MSi^ ? s &?••i^;; PETITIONER: •?.'?•• •A.'o^e- .^f^TS...--"" ?..^-:^^'fl@^^"' ^^m^^'" v'" 1 ...•••" AS4-'" Ramayan Prasad S/0 Kunjram Aged about 50-years occupation- agriculture Resident of Village- Peeparsatti Post-office - Pondi (Dalha) police station -Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: iy ^'^S.h^-C-i.^ 's%yf/syv^ "'''•'h-.-asF*'" 2) State ofChhattisgarh, Through its Secretary The Agriculture department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Union oflndia Through it's Secretary The Agriculture department New Delhi The Manager Panjab National Bank Branch - Akaltara (Taraud) Tahsil & police station Akaltara District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ^_z^<, WRIT PETITION UNDER AURTICLE^^OF THE CONSTITUTION OIJNDIA 3) " 4^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON (C) No. 5124 of2010 Ramavan Prasad. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Ofhers. WRIT PETmON UNDER ,4RTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrrm'ION OF WDIA Satish K^AgmhoitriijJ. Shri Ravi Maheshwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao. Govenmient Advocate for the State, Smt. Poiizia Mirza. Assistant Solicitor General fortbe Union of iTil Shri Malay Sfarivastava, Advocate for the respondent No. 3. (Passed on 10m day ofAugust, 2011) Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitioner submits that the dispute involved ia the petition has been settled outside the Court nofhing suivives for adjudication in this matter. Thus, the has become infixictuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side do not controvert tlie 3. in view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as havins become iajructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ijba...-