HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRL.R.C. No.1412 of 2004 JUDGMENT: This criminal revision case is directed against the judgment of the learned VI-Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Tirupathi, in Crl.A.No.20 of 2002 dated 19.06.2003 confirming the conviction and sentence of fine of Rs.1,000/- each, in default, simple imprisonment for a period of two months each for the offences punishable under Section 324 I.P.C. and 324 read with Section 34 of I.P.C., imposed against the revision petitioners-A1 to A11 by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Piler, in C.C.No.45 of 1999 dated 24.12.2001. Brief facts of the case are that on 13.03.1999 at about 10 A.M. the accused criminally trespassed into the field of P.W.2 with deadly weapons and that A-2 beat P.W.2 with the reverse side of an axe on his left leg and left hand, causing bleeding injury; A-9 beat P.W.1 with a stick on his chest; A-1, A-3 and A-4 beat P.W.1 with sticks on his legs and waist; A-3 beat P.W.3 with a stick on his left hand; A-9 beat with a stick on the right knee of P.W.4; A-1 and A-4 beat P.W.5 on his fingers of both hands and right shoulder; A-2, A-5 beat P.W.6 with sticks and caused injuries on her right shoulder, waist and left knee; A-2 beat P.W.7 with a stick on her upper left hand and A-6 beat with a stick on the right and left shoulder of P.W.7.. On the basis of a report lodged by P.W.2, the police registered a case in Crime No.19 of 1999 against the accused under Sections 447, 352, 323, 324 and 506 read with Section 34 of I.P.C. Eventually, after completion of investigation, the police laid charge sheet against the accused. During the course of trial, on behalf of the prosecution P.Ws.1 to 11 were examined and Exs.P1 to P11 and M.Os.1 and 2 were marked to prove the guilt of the accused. Exs.D1 to D3 were marked on behalf of the accused. On a perusal of the entire evidence, both oral and documentary, the trial Court found the revision petitioners- accused guilty of the offences punishable under Sections 324 I.P.C and 324 read with Section 34 of I.P.C. and accordingly convicted and sentenced them as stated supra. In an appeal preferred by the revision petitioners- accused against the said conviction and sentence, the learned VI Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Tirupathi, dismissed the said appeal confirming the judgment of the trial Court. Aggrieved by the same, the revision petitioners-accused preferred this criminal revision. Heard both sides. Learned Counsel for the petitioners fairly conceded that this is not a fit case to interfere with the findings recorded by the trial Court as well as the appellate Court, but, however, he requested this Court to take a lenient view in the matter since the petitioners are not in a position to pay the fine amount of Rs.1,000/- under each count. On perusal of the entire evidence on record, this Court is of the view that the trial Court as well as the appellate Court have given sufficient and cogent reasons in convicting the petitioners-accused. Therefore, no interference is warranted as far as conviction is concerned, but with regard to the quantum of sentence of fine, this Court is of the view that a lenient view can be taken by reducing the sentence of fine of Rs.1000/- to Rs.500/- each under each count. Accordingly, the sentence of fine of Rs.1,000/- each under each count imposed against the revision petitioners- A1 to A11 for the offences punishable under Section 324 I.P.C. and also 324 read with Section 34 of I.P.C., by the Courts below, is reduced to Rs.500/- each under each count, in default, the petitioners-accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month under each count. Except the above modification, in all other aspects, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. ____________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 15-12-2010 Gsn.