:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.817 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 108 OF 2005 Ms. Sippy Jay Sethia ... Applicant versus Jay Kanniyalal Sethia and others ... Respondents ... Mr. M.S. Adenwalla, for the Applicant. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 8th February 2005 P.C.: . Not on Board. Upon mentioning, taken on Board. . In my opinion, this application is ill-advised. The practice of this Court is that circulation is obtained on the basis of praecipie filed by the Advocate on Record for the Applicant :2: or the Respondent, as the case may be. If the Applicant wanted Criminal Application No. 108 of 2005 to be heard, it was open to the Applicant to follow the said practice of this Court. Suffice it to observe that this application is nothing but increasing work of this Court and adding to the cost of litigation of the Applicant. This application is disposed of. . Insofar as Criminal Application No. 108 of 2005 is concerned, there is already a judicial order passed on 20th January 2005 that the same be listed along with Criminal Application No. 5334/2004 on 10th February 2005. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)