1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4249 OF 2009 Mrs. Joystna w/o. Ramkrushna Dhake ....Petitioner. Versus Tapi Sahakari Patpethi Chopda, Having its Branch at Visanjinagar, Jalgaon ....Respondents. Shri. S.R. Deshpande, Advocate for petitioner. Shri. A.G. Talhar, Advocate for respondent. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4250 OF 2009 Shri. Ramkrushna s/o. Onkar Dhake ....Petitioner. Versus Tapi Sahakari Patpethi Chopda, Having its Branch at Visanjinagar, Jalgaon ....Respondents. Shri. S.R. Deshpande, Advocate for petitioner. Shri. A.G. Talhar, Advocate for respondent. CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 20th July, 2010. PER COURT : 1. It is an admitted position that the revision application No. 4/2009 preferred by the petitioner before the Co-operative Appellate Authority 2 at Aurangabad is pending. Notice on the application for interim relief has already been issued. The revision petition challenges the order dated 1.6.2009 passed below Exh. 12 by the Co-operative Court at Jalgaon in dispute No. 1331/2008. The Co-operative Court rejected the application for interim relief, on the ground that recovery certificate under section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 has been issued on 5.3.2009. 2. In view of the fact that the Revision No. 4/2009 is pending before the Co-operative Appellate Court at Aurangabad and the notice on application for interim relief has already been issued, I do not think that the case is made out for interference under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Shri. Talhar, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent sole submits that the respondent shall appear before the Co-operative Appellate Authority on 3rd of August 2010 and shall submit the reply to the application for stay, filed before the Appellate Court. 3. In view of above, there is no substance in the writ petitions, the same are therefore, dismissed. However, the dismissal of these writ petitions shall not come in the way of the Appellate Court to decide the application or the revision on its own merits in accordance with law. [ R.K. DESHPANDE, J. ] ssc/wp4249.09