IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 27TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 8TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 1528 of 2009(F) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- JOSEPH JOHN PARIYARATH HOUSE, THAIKKATTUKARA PO, ALUVA ERNAKULAM - 06. BY ADVS. MR.C.P.CHANDRASEKHARAN (CALICUT), MR.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, VIJAYA BANK, M.G.ROAD, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, (HRD) VIJAYA BANK, M.G.ROAD, ERNAKULAM. 3. JAYSON.A.A. S/O.ALUNKAL ANTONY, ALUNKAL HOUSE, CHANDIROOR P.O, ALAPPUZHA. R1 & R2 BY ADVS. MR. K. ANAND, SMT. LATHA KRISHNAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/02/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.1528 of 2009-F = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 27th day of February, 2009. JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed seeking relief in relation to securitisation proceedings. Petitioner had earlier obtained Ext.P1 judgment. He did not pay the entire amounts covered by that judgment. This writ petition is filed on the strength of Ext.P3, an affidavit sworn to by one S.Manilal who, in Ext.P3, stated that he had advanced an amount of Rs.10 lakhs and had agreed to purchase the property of the petitioner for Rs.1 crore. This Court issued summons to the said person to appear before Court to state on the veracity of Ext.P3. Such an order was issued because this Court was apprehensive of the credibility of the said Manilal whose name has often been noticed in different litigations. With the aid of the computerisation of the High Court, this Court could lay its hands on a few writ petitions by Manilal and when he gave evidence WP(C)1528/2009 -: 2 :- before this Court, he did not deny having filed other writ petitions and having also claimed the status as an insolvent by filing an Insolvency Petition before the Sub Court, Kottayam. The Government had to get one of the writ petitions of Manilal disposed of by obtaining a direction to the Sub Court, Kottayam to dispose the Insolvency Petition. It is that Manilal who has stated in Ext.P3 that he would buy the petitioner's property for Rs.1 crore. In the normal course of events, I would have ordered the Revenue Intelligence to look into the ways, means and whereabouts, as also the assets of Manilal. I desist from doing so in this case for the simple reason that the learned counsel for the petitioner states that this writ petition is not pressed. The writ writ petition is hence dismissed as not pressed. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/020309