IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30423 of 2009 SURESH PRASAD YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a Police case under Sections 395 of the Penal Code. The allegations are against 14-15 unknown persons under Section 395 of the Penal Code. The submission is of false implication and nothing has been recovered from his possession. Counsel for the State from the impugned order of rejection points out the identification of the petitioner by inmates of the house referred to in the case diary. The application is rejected. If so advised, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after the inmates alleged to have recognized him, depose in the trial when the prayer for bail may be considered afresh. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)