IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Suit No. 1 of 2008. Decided on 8th December, 2011. 1. Sh. Vijay Kumar Bhan son of late Shri T.N. Bhan, resident of 16, Titla Hotel, Jakhoo, Shimla-171001. 2. Sh. Diwakar Dutt Kamal son of late Sh. Atma Ram, resident of Abhishek Niwas, bye-pass road, Bhatta Kuffer, Tehsil and District Shimla, H.P. ..…Plaintiffs. Versus 1. Sh. Ramesh son of late Shri Ruloo Ram, 2. Sh. Suresh son of late Sh. Ruloo Ram, 3. Sh. Parvin son of late Sh. Ruloo Ram, 4. Smt. Saroj daughter of late Sh. Ruloo Ram, All residents of 81, The Mall, Shimla-171001. …..Defendants. Suit for specific performance of agreement dated 28th June, 2006 for the sale of land comprised in khewat No.32 min/51-52 denoted by khasra No.1528, measuring 86.80 sq. meters, khasra No.1531, measuring 529.31 sq. meters and khasra No. 1529 measuring 47.88 sq. meters, gairmumkin house Kachha one storey, kita 3 total area 580 sq. meters situated at up-mohal Ridge Tehsil and district Shimla recorded in ownership and possession of defendants as per jamabandi for the year 2001-2002 dated 8.1.2008 and for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from encumbering, alienating, transferring and disposing the aforesaid land to any person except the plaintiffs. _____________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Plaintiffs : Mr. B.S. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Defendants : Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate. V.K. Sharma, J. (Oral) C.S. No. 1 of 2008 and CMP No. 487 of 2011. Amended memo of parties stands filed. The case is at the stage of evidence in rebuttal. However, OMP No. 487 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 of 2011 has been jointly moved on behalf of the parties, under Order 22, Rule 3 read with Section 151, CPC with a prayer for recording the compromise entered into between the parties, which is taken on record as Ex. C-1. Statements at the bar made by the learned counsel for the parties go to support the compromise between them. 2. In view of the amicable settlement between the parties as is reflected from compromise, Ex. C-1, the suit is disposed of as compromised in terms thereof. Compromise, Ex.C-1 shall form part of the decree. The parties shall abide by the terms and conditions of compromise, Ex. C-1 in letter and spirit and failure to do so shall entail consequences as per law. 3. The suit stands disposed of as compromised in the above terms. As prayed for, the original document, Ex. PW1/D (three sheets) is ordered to be returned to the plaintiffs through counsel subject to placing a certified copy thereof on the records of the case. (V.K.Sharma.) Judge. 8th December, 2011. (jai)