WP(C) 1029/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Mr. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this case is covered by the order dated 9.6.2010 passed in W.P.(C) No. 2598/2009 by which the following direction was issued. Since the vacancies were in existence, even before the computer test and advertisement were issued for filing up the said posts, the amended rules broug ht into effect during the course of the selection, could not have been made app licable. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of directing the re spondents to consider the case of the petitioner strictly in terms of the stipul ation made in the advertisement in respect of the computer knowledge and not on the basis of the amendment brought to the recruitment rules(Rule 18). If upon su ch consideration of the case, the petitioner is found suitable for selection, ne cessary follow up action shall be taken by the respondents. It is made clear tha t the selection and appointment of 52 selected candidates vide Annexure- D selec t list dated 10.6.2009, shall not be disturbed. Be it stated here, by virtue of interim order dated 10.9.2009 of this proceeding, a post of typist is still vaca nt. However, Ms. R. Chakraborty, learned State Counsel submits that the matt er requires examination of the case of the petitioner by the respondents. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the respondents to examine the case of the petitioner in terms of the impugned orde r dated 9.6.2010 passed in W.P.(C) No. 2598/09. If upon such examination it is f ound that the case of the petitioner is covered by the said order this case will be considered accordingly in terms of the direction contained therein.