IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 10813 of 2009 Between: Saleh Bin Farej, S/o. Farej Bin Abdullah, R/o. 14-1-237/1, Seetharampet, Mangalhat, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner with office at Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner, GHMC, Circle No.2, Sardar Mahal, Hyderabad./ 3 Smt. Bushra Mohsin, W/o.Mohsin Bin Abdulla, R/o. 14-1-176/1, Settharampet Mangalhat, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue Writ, Order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents 1 & 2 to initiate suitable steps for removing the illegal constructions carried out by the respondent No.2 in her house and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.AHMED KHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: R.RADHA KRISHNA REDDY(SC FOR GHMC,SNCZONE) The Court made the following : . THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.10813 OF 2009 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking declaration that the action of respondents 2 and 3 in not considering the petitioner’s representation dated 25-08-2008 requesting to remove the alleged illegal construction made by the third respondent in the premises bearing No.14-1-176/1, situated at Seetharampet, Hyderabad is arbitrary and illegal. The material placed before this Court shows that the petitioner made a representation on 25-08-2008 to the second respondent and the same was received in the office of the second respondent on 25-08-2008 itself. In the circumstances, the second respondent is bound to make necessary enquiry into the allegations made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to the correctness o the allegations made by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 25-08-2008 and pass appropriate orders in accordance wit law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order. It is made clear that before passing an such order, the third respondent herein shall be given an opportunity to rebut the allegations made by the petitioner. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. __________ 03-06-2009 Rns/Pn To 1 The Superintendent of Prohibition and Excise, Karimnagar District, Karimnagar. 2 The Inspector of Prohibition and Excise, Yellareddypet Village and mandal, Karimnagar District. 3 The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Government of Andhra Pradesh at Nampally, Hyderabad. 4. 2 CCs to GP for Prohibition & Excise, High Court Bldgs, Hyderabad. (OUT). 5. Two CD copies. 6. 8 LR copies. 7. The Under Secretary, Union of India, Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs, New Delhi. 8. The Secretary, A.P. Advocates’ Association Library, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad.