1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1396 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7460 OF 2003 Uday Madhavsinh Palicha & Anr. ...Applicants/ Petitioners vs Jawahar Narandas Paleja & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Jawahar J. Thakkar for the Applicants. Mr.Y.A. Rajput for Respondent Nos.6,7 and 8. Mr.Dushyant Purekar for Respondent No.2. Mr.Ajay S. Patil for Respondent Nos.1A to 1C, 1F and 3. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : JUNE 17, 2009 P.C. :- 1 Heard Counsel for the applicants. 2 It is submitted by the Counsel that in spite of best efforts being taken, respondent no. 1(E) could not be served since she is not residing at the last known residential address. When an 2 attempt was made to serve respondent no.1(E) through the Bailiff at her last known residential address, the Bailiff was informed by her neighbour that she is residing in USA, however, her address is not known. It is, therefore, submitted that leave may be granted to serve her by substituted service. 2 The application, therefore, is allowed in terms of prayer clause 6(a). Civil application, accordingly, is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)