1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 3861 OF 2010 (Ku. Sarita L. Mutha & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. JUNE 28, 2011. Heard Shri Mohgaonkar, learned counsel for petitioners, Shri Kankale, learned AGP for respondents No. 1 & 2, Shri Mishra, learned counsel for respondent No. 3, Shri Deo, learned counsel for respondent No. 4 and Shri Godbole, learned counsel for respondent No.5. The question is of releasing benefits of Sixth Wage Revision and senior scale to the petitioners who admittedly are in employment. The appropriate steps for said purpose could not be taken because of some dispute in the management and the Head Mistress. We find that such dispute between petitioners inter-se or between petitioners and management or between management and Head Mistress, is totally irrelevant. The service benefits need to be extended to the petitioners. Shri Godbole, learned counsel states that appropriate proposal for releasing the benefits is 2 already forwarded by Respondent No. 5 to Respondent No. 3. Shri Mishra, learned counsel points out that the Accounts Officer, Education Department (Primary), Ravi Nagar, Nagpur, is an independent authority for said purpose and the proposal needs to be sent by Respondent No. 5 to the said authority directly. That authority is not made party before this Court. Shri Mohgaonkar, learned counsel seeks leave to add said authority as party respondent. Leave granted. The petitioner to add the said authority as party respondent No. 6. Shri Kankale, learned AGP present in the court waives notice for added Respondent No. 6. Respondent No. 5 shall forward necessary proposal directly to Respondent No. 6 by 12th July 2011 and Respondent No. 6 consider the same in accordance with law as early as possible and pass appropriate orders upon it in any case by 15th October 2011. Liberty to the parties aggrieved by that order to approach this Court again. With these directions and observations, writ petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.