1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.25 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.32 OF 2006 IN PETITION NO.114 OF 2006 1.Bipinchandra Hiralal Gandhi and another. ...Petitioners vs. Kirit Jayantilal Shah. ...Caveator/ Respondent --- Mr.Sunil Rawal, for Petitioners. Ms.Priti S. i/b. Ms.R.D.Bhatia, for respondent. 2 CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 26st April,2007 P.C.:- 1. It is clear from the affidavit filed by the Advocate that he could not attend the matter on 1.3.2007 because he missed the matter on the Internet. Considering that the affidavit has been filed by the Advocate himself, in my opinion, the notice of motion deserves to be restored. The notice of motion is therefore, granted in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). Place the notice of motion no.3 of 2007 on board on 27th April,2007. ---