IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Criminal Misc. No. M-3969 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision:01.07.2008 Pankaj Bansal .....Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, DAG, Punjab. **** RAJESH BINDAL J. The petitioner in the present case had approached this Court with the allegations that in spite of the fact that in the anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner before the learned Sessions Judge, Amritsar it was pleaded by the police that the petitioner is not required in any case but still the petitioner was being harassed. Reply on behalf of respondents has been filed in Court today in the form of affidavit of Gurnam Singh, DSP-City-I, Amritsar City. It is specifically pleaded in paras No.4 to 6 of the reply that the petitioner is not wanted in any case by the local police. The house of the petitioner was neither raided nor the petitioner was kept in illegal detention. There is no complaint pending against the petitioner before the police. Keeping this stand of the respondents in view, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. July 01, 2008 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) renu JUDGE