IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1185 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1185 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1185 OF 2006 Jayendrakumar S. Shah. ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India & 2 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. P.M. Patel for the petitioner. Mr. N.D. Sharma for the respondent No.1. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 27TH APRIL, 2006 P.C. : . For the view to be taken, notice on respondent No.2 dispensed with. Learned counsel states that respondent No.1 has been served. 2. It is a case of the petitioners that he has filed an application in the year 1999 to respondent No.2 that has yet to be decided. Considering the controversy, we direct respondent No.2 to dispose of his application within eight weeks from the copy of this order being served on respondent No.2. : 2 : 3. Petition disposed of accordingly. Sd/- [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]