IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 5733 of 2010 Date of decision: 16.09.2010 ________________________________________________________________________ Prakash Singh & Others. .....Petitioners. Versus The State of H.P. & Others .....Respondents. Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra,J. The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma,J. ________________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate. For respondent No. 1: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Additional Advocate General. For respondent No. 2: Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, vice counsel. For respondent no. 3: Mr. K.S. Kanwar with Ms. Shikha Thakur, Advocates. For respondent No. 4: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India. R.B. Misra, J. (Oral) The writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: “The present petition may kindly be allowed and the Annexure P-J and P-L may kindly be quashed & set-aside with a further direction to the respondents to conduct the examination of the petitioners for the said course of JBT qua which the petitioners has already undergone prescribed course and completed the same successfully from the respondent No. 3 institute in the session 2002-2004 as has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Bhawna Sharma's case ...2... keeping in view the submissions made herein above and in the interest of justice with a further direction to the respondents to award them the certificate / diploma for the said course if they qualifies the said examination.” 2. It has been submitted by Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, learned counsel for the petitioners that the present petition could be disposed of in the light of the judgments passed by this Court from time to time in different writ petitions of identical nature and it has also been submitted that the present writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the judgment dated 27.08.2010, passed in CWP No. 5352 of 2010 (Kanchan Sharma & others vs. State of H.P. & others). Therefore the present writ petition is being disposed of at the initial admission stage itself. 3. In absence of any otherwise submissions by the learned counsel for the respondents and in view of the fact that no different stand has been taken other than what has been submitted in CWP No. 5352 of 2010 (Kanchan Sharma & others vs. State of H.P. & others), and the stand of the petitioners has not been controverted, as such without elaborating the factual aspects in detail, the present petition is being disposed of in view of the above decision. As such, the present petition is allowed in terms of the decision dated 27.08.2010 passed in CWP No. 5352 of 2010. 4. However, directions given therein are to be complied with within the stipulated period, as indicated in the above order dated 27.08.2010 passed in CWP No. 5352 of 2010, however, in the meantime, the examination has to be conducted. ...3... 5. In view of the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (R.B. Misra) Judge (V.K. Sharma) Judge 16th September, 2010 (virender)