IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.1199 of 2011 Date of decision : 21.1.2011 Gurdeep Singh ....Petitioner Versus Punjabi University, Patiala ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Harpal Singh Sirohi, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. There is no reason to grant the prayer that has been made by the petitioner in the instant petition. The petitioner after getting his result in English which showed zero marks applied for re-evaluation which was also done and the result of the petitioner improved marginally by indicating 8 marks. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that it is not conceivable that he would have got zero and eight marks when he had attempted all the questions. I am not inclined to accept he prayer of the petitioner for the simple reason that according to the rules which permitted him a chance of re-evaluation, which chance he had availed of and after availing the same he cannot said that he has still any grievance unless he shows and demonstrates from the averments made in the petition that the suspicion raised by him regarding the wrong evaluation to C.W.P.No.1199 of 2011 -2- the answer book is justified. There is no material from where such inference can be drawn. The Court was prepared to look into his grievance provided he establishes his bona fides that he was ready to deposit some costs that may be imposed on him in the eventuality of his averments being found baseless and also in order to show his bona fides, to which the petitioner expresses his inability. For the aforesaid, the petition is held to be without any merit and is dismissed. However, the petitioner may in his wisdom pursue his remedy with the respondents, if any. 21.1.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss