-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 595 OF 2002 Manmohan Singh Bhullar ... Petitioner versus Union of India and others ...Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr. Vinay Masurkar with Mr. D.A. Dubey and Mr. S.C. Pal, instructed by Dr. T.C. Kaushik for the Union of India. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATE: JUNE 25, 2009. P.C. On 18th June, 2009, we passed the following order. ‘None present for the petitioner to argue this petition. Considering the fact that the matter is in connection with the pensionary benefits, adjourned to 25th June, 2009 with a hope that on the next date the learned counsel or the petitioner would remain present to argue the matter. In case if the petitioner fails to remain present on the next date, appropriate orders would be passed in the absence of the learned counsel for the petitioner”. Today also none appears for the petitioner. Petition is dismissed for default. Rule is discharged. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. R.M. SAVANT, J.