IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10068 of 2009 ***** Jageshwar Rai, S/o Late Badri Rai, resident of village- Sunderpur, Panchayat Raj –Sunderpur West, Block-Kesharia, District-East Champaran. …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The State Election Commission, 2nd Floor, Sone Bhawan, Beer Chand Patel Path, Patna-1 represented through its Secretary, The State Election Commission, 2nd Floor, Sone Bhawan, Beer Chand Patel Path, Patna-1. 3. The District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari. 4. The District Panchayat Raj Officer, East Champaran, Motihari. 5. The Sub Divisional officer, Chakiya, East Champaran. 6. The Block Development Officer-cum-Executive Officer, Block Keshariya, District-East Champaran. 7. Smt. Sumitra Kumari Yadav, Pramukh of Punchayat Samiti-Keshariya, District-East Champaran. 8. Md. Sultan, Up Pramukh of Punchayat Samiti-Keshariya, District-East Champaran. 9. Shri Raj Kishore Singh, S/o- not known to this petitioner. 10. Shri Nawal Yadav, S/o- not known to this petitioner. 11. Smt. Babunti Devi, W/o Sri Munna Sah. 12. Shri Mewalal Sahni, S/o- not known to this petitioner. 13. Managing Director. Qayum, S/o- not known to this petitioner. 14. Shri Anil Prasad Yadav, S/o- not known to this petitioner. 15. Md. Ekramuddin, S/o- not known to this petitioner. 16. Shri Madhuri Singh, S/o- not known to this petitioner. 17. Shri Dharmendra Yadav, S/o- not known to this petitioner. 18. Smt. Veena Devi, W/o Sri Subodh Singh. 19. Smt. Sugandhi Devi, W/o Shri Hridyanand Sahni. 20. Smt. Uma Devi, W/o Shri Harinder Rai. 21. Smt. Renu Devi, W/o- not known to this petitioner. 22. Shri Chandrika Pawan, S/o- not known to this petitioner. 23. Shri Ravindra Yadav, S/o Shri Dukhit Rai. 24. Smt. Reeta Devi, W/o Shri Sanjay Kushwaha. 25. Smt. Sudha Devi, W/o Shri Ramdeo Das. 26. Smt. Najmoon Nesha (Khatoon), W/o Md. Mushtafa Khan. Respondent no. 9 to 26 are the Members of Punchayat Samiti-Keshariya represented through Block Development Officer-cum-Executive Officer, District- East Champaran. …. …. Respondents ----------- 2. 20.8.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Since the matter is still under consideration of the district - 2 - authorities, no direction is required to be issued, however, petitioner is at liberty to pursue the matter before the concerned authorities. The writ application is dismissed. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)