-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 346 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 346 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 346 OF 2008 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 405 OF2008 IN A.O.NO.346 OF 2008 Jagannath Thakur and Ors. .. Appellants. V/s. Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondents. --- Mr.S.M. Sakhardande ii/by S.S.Wagh for the Appellants. Mr.V.A. Thorat, Sr.Advocate with Anil Rao for the Respondents. --- CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR,J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR,J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR,J. DATED : 11th APRIL, 2008. DATED : 11th APRIL, 2008. DATED : 11th APRIL, 2008. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. :- . Admit. Heard finally. 2. The only grievance against the impugned order is that it directs the appellants to keep the suit premises vacant and clear. It is contended that these words may be construed to mean that the appellants cannot even enter upon the suit premises for any purpose whatsoever. 3. The apprehension is unfounded. The purport of the order is clear. All that the learned Judge has directed the appellants to do is to keep the plot vacant -: 2 :- and clear, meaning thereby not to put any structure of whatsover nature and extent thereon. Further the appellants are not permitted to carry on any activity other than merely for the purpose of remaining thereon and entering there upon only incidental to the residential use of the structure in his occupation. Even for the residential user the appellants have been prohibited by the said order from either putting up any structure or leaving any movable property thereon. Hence, the impugned order does not call for interference. 4. A.O. is disposed of accordingly. Nothing survives in the Civil Application and the same is also disposed of as such. (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J) .....