IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6266 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 29.10.2009 Jagdish Rai .....Petitioner versus Tejinder Singh Rai @ Lovely .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Manish Kumar Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) In this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-landlord seeks directions to the Rent Controller, Sangrur, to decide the Rent Petition No.14 dated 17.5.2007 (Jagdish Rai versus Tejinder Singh Rai), expeditiously and preferably within a time bound manner. Relying upon the zimini orders passed by the Rent Controller from time to time, it is urged on behalf of the petitioner that the respondent is adopting delaying tactics on one pretext or the other. Having heard counsel for the petitioner at some length, I am of the considered view that though it is difficult to issue any time bound C.R. No.6266 of 2009 (O&M) 2 directions as there might be other eviction petitions filed at an earlier point of time and still pending consideration before the Rent Controller and no out of turn treatment can, therefore, be given to the rent petition filed by the petitioner, however, like any other litigant, the petitioner is also entitled to the speedy disposal of his case. This revision petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the Rent Controller, Sangrur, to make an endevour to decide the afore-stated eviction petition filed by the petitioner as early as possible and preferably within six months. Dasti. 29-10-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE