PETITIONER/ DEFENDANT NO. 1. RESPONDENTS \ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (227) Ki). 6037/2009 Jf VERSUS 1} Pradeep Agrawal S/o Taxa Chand Agrawal, aged about 35 years, R/o Shivam Haldwam, Belgahna, Tahsil Kota Dishict Bilaspur (C.G.). Sandeep Agrawal S/o Tara Chand Agrawal, aged about 33 years, R/o Beiga'hna, Tahsil Kota District Bilaspur (C. G.). PLANTIFF. Shayam Sundar Agrawal S/o Tara Chand Agrawal, aged about 50 years, DEFENDANT N0. 3. Dilip Kumar Agrawal S/o Tara Chand Agrawal, aged about 45 years, DEFENDANT N0. 4. ~Ba1dev S/o Tara Chand Agrawal, aged about 3O years, DEFENDANT N0. 5, Kamla Bai Agrawal Wd/o Tara Chand Agrawal, aged about 7O years, DEFENDANT N0. 6. Respondent No. 2 to 5 are R/o ViHage Belgahna, Tahsil Kata (Wrongly mentioned in order sheet Tahsil Katghora), District Bilaspur (C. G.). Prem Bai D/o Tara Chand Agrawa, aged about 42 years, R/o Bhagwati News Agency, Bus Stand, Ambikapur, Surguja (C.G.). DEFENDANT NO. 7. Rekha Bai D10 Taraohand Agrawa, aged about 4O years Through Sitaram Kg‘rawal, Naya Khursipar Bhjlai, District Durg (CG). DEFENDANT N0. 8. Naudni D10 Tara Chand Agrawa, ' Through Ghasiram Ghanshyam pas Goyal, Saktimudi Chowk, Baikunthpur, Post Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.). DEFENDANT NO. 9 State o Chhattisgarh, Through: Co ‘ector ’ Bilaspur, Diatm'ct 3] 4] 5] 61 7] 8] 91 f ._.;// ‘30 §> Bilaspur (C. G.). DEFENDANT N9. 2 10] The Lok Adalat, Through Sgcrgtaxy, District Legal Ssrvices Committee, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.), WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Hon’bie Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present- Shri Pradeep Agrawal petitioner present in person. Shri Shree Kumar Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Shri Anand Gupta, Advocate for the respondents No. 1 to 8. Shri Sumit Jhanwar, P.L. for the State/respondent No. 9. Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocete for the respondent No. 10. ORDER (Passed on 14/ 1212011) 1. Shri Shree Kumar Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Shn‘ Anand Gupta, Advocate for the respondents 310. 1 to 8 and Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate for the respondent No. 10 submits that present petitioner has supplied copy to them for Withdrawal of petition with liberty to approach Court below. 2. Petitioner present in person submits that he has prepared application for Withdrawal of petition. 1 3. Petitioner present in person further submits that he is Filing the same and consequently he tiles application for withdrawal of petition with liberty to approach before the Court below. 4. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India ..g petitioner has chall/enged the legality and propriety of the award passed in Lok Adalat i.e. by Civil Judge Class-2,~Kota in civil suit No. 19A/2007 dated 6/9/ 2009. As prayed application for withdrawal of petition is allowed. Petition is dismissed as Withdrawn. Petitioner is at liberty to approach trial Court. No order as to costs. 6. All interim applications are dismissed. 2.‘ /.