Criminal Revision No. 566 OF 1995 ******** Against the judgment and order of conviction dated 31.8.1995 passed in Sessions Trial No. 137 of 1993 by the learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur. ****** RAJENDRA THAKUR S/O SHRI NARAIN THAKUR, R/O VILLAGE NAYAGAON BARIYARPUR, P.S. DESRI, DISTRICT- VAISHALI. ……..….. Appellant Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. NAND KISHORE THAKUR S/O LATE SOGARTH THAKUR 3. RAM PUKAR THAKUR S/O LATE DIPCHAND THAKUR 4. NAWAL KISHORE THAKUR 5. JUGAL KISHORE THAKUR BOTH S/O LATE SOGARATH THAKUR 6. AWADH KISHORE THAKUR S/O RAMPUKAR THAKUR 7. MAHENDRA THAKUR S/O LATE SOGARATH THAKUR ALL R/O VILLAGE- NAYAGAON, P.S.- DESRI, DISTRICT- VAISHALI ..………. Opposite Party 2nd set ************ For the Appellant : Mr. N.P. Sinha Sr. Adv. For the State : J.K. Singh APP. P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ********* Anjana Prakash, J. The appellants who is the informant is aggrieved with the judgment dated 31.8.1995 passed in Sessions Trial No. 137 of 1993 by the learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur, by which the court below has convicted the opposite party nos. 2 to 7 under Section 302/34 I.P.C. 2. On going through the judgment impugned, I find that the same does not suffer from any patent perversity or illegality and it cannot be concluded that no reasonable person would arrive at such a conclusion. 3. In the result the Revision is dismissed. Patna High Court, ( Anjana Prakash, J. ) Patna Dated the 25th April, 2011 NAFR/ Fahad.