Crl. Misc. No. M-33997 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-33997 of 2011 Date of Decision : December 16, 2011 Jagdish .... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. J. P. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. C. S. Bakshi, Addl. A. G., Haryana. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Hari Singh, states that pursuant to interim order of this Court, petitioner has since joined investigation. Counsel for the petitioner pointed out that complainant filed Civil Suit for permanent injunction only and did not claim relief of specific performance of the alleged agreement, which had been denied by the petitioner. It is also pointed out that temporary injunction was denied to the complainant vide order Annexure P-1. It was also submitted that even Crl. Misc. No. M-33997 of 2011 2 limitation period for filing the suit for specific performance of the agreement has expired. It was further pointed out that alleged agreement is said to be dated 24.01.2008 and mortgage was created on 16.07.2009, but the instant FIR has been lodged on 24.09.2011 i.e. after long delay, complainant having failed to get interim relief from Civil Court. In view of the aforesaid, but without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the case, the instant petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. Interim order dated 11.11.2011 is made absolute. December 16, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE