1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10528 of 2011-C Decided on: 7.12.2011 Brahma Nand, S/o Sh. Pania Ram Sharma, Resident of Village Pal, Post Officer Bakhal, Tehsil Kotkhai, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh ......Petitioner Versus 1. The Stae of H.P., through Secretary (Elementary Education) Govt. of H.P. Shimla-2. 2. The Director of Elementary Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla. .....Respondents Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order, or direction to the respondents on the grounds mentioned in the body of the writ petition. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. 2 Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner claims benefit of adhoc and tenure service rendered by him. It is seen that some period is as J.B.T teacher and some period is as Shastri. As far as J.B.T. is concerned, that period will count only for the purpose of pension as per Rule 13 of the Pension Rules. As far as the adhoc/tenure period in the post of Shastri concerned, in case the same is followed by regular appointment, that period shall be counted for the purpose of increments and pension, in view of the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State of H.P. The needful shall be done within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 2. The writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. December 7, 2011 (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/hl) Judge.