IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 27622 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 20.10.2011 Beant Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. M.P.S. Mann, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. …… RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for the State at the very outset stated that the FIR has been registered only under Sections 498 and 506 IPC. Offences under both the Sections are bailable though in the order passed by the learned court below Sections 406 and 498-A IPC were also mentioned. Considering the aforesaid facts, no interference is called for in the present petition by this Court. However, it is directed that in case any offence pertaining to matrimonial dispute is added, subsequently which is non-bailable, the petitioners may be given three days’ notice before arresting them. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 20.10.2011 sharmila