THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.814 of 2010 ORDER: The respondent filed O.S.No.11 of 2009 in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Jammalamadugu against the petitioner for recovery of certain amount. The suit was decreed on 12.11.2009 and an appeal is said to have been filed by the petitioner against the decree. The respondent filed E.P.No.5 of 2010 for recovery of the amount. He prayed for attachment of the salary of the petitioner. The Executing Court issued notice on 07.01.2010 fixing 03.02.2010 as next date for appearance of the petitioner. However, on the same day i.e., 07.01.2010 itself the Executing Court ordered attachment of the salary of the petitioner. The same is challenged in this revision. Heard Sri L.J.Veera Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri K.Rathanga Pani Reddy, learned counsel for the sole respondent. The E.P is no doubt filed with a prayer to attach the salary of the petitioner. Once the Executing Court has chosen to issue notice in the E.P., it ought to have waited for the response from the petitioner. While issuing notice itself, the Executing Court directed attachment of the salary, which is totally impermissible in law. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly allowed and the order under revision is set aside. It is directed that the Executing Court shall pass appropriate orders duly taking into account the contentions that may be advanced by the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Date: 17.03.2010 va