<7^r} CL/ ^J^B Ea ^S"^?^-i jl^^LE KtWUs IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR -7 W. P. ( SINo. ';£ /2009 PETITIONER ^' ^ ....^^ /^^€^ y<s.-'- ..f."' \..--' ^•^-/,.•-• Santosh Kum.ar Singh Sarve, S/o Phool Prasad Singh Sarve, aged about 39 years, Occupation- Head Master Govemment Primary School, Markadih, Block Nawagarh, Distt. Janjgir (Champa) (C.G.). y VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer, District Janjgir (Champa) (C.G.) 3. The Block Education Officer, Block Nawagarh, District Janjgir (Champa) (C.G.). 4. The Treasury Account and Pension, District Janjgir (Champa) (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER_ ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ,^ "~<1 c,, iJ!^Xj ?^t'^I JS5T a^iS i?**' rii^n wUUKs ur ^i 'ETiTiON i)NO. OF 2009 Santosh Kumar Sinsh Sarve \/,versus feoTC! er Anscie the Con; 'etrtion uns Single Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotn, J. Present:- Shri Shakfi Raj Sinha, counse! for the petitioner. N.N. Roy, Panel Lav<?yer for fhe State. 'nps Gowri 3. At (Passed on this 3'" day of December, 2009) With the consent of iearned counssl appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finally. [ At the very outset, learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that thls petition is squarely covered by.the decislon of this Court passsd in W.P. (S) No.6257 o* 2008 Kant Singh vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) & W.P. (S) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma v. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and anotherS and other connected matters. Learned counsel orays Ihat simiiar reiief may :bs granted in. case of ths present petitioner slso. : , this. juncture,iearned counse! appearing for the Sfate submsts that in the event the petitioner submits a detaited representatlon the same shali be considered and decided, in accordarice with iaw and in vievi? of the decasion of this Court:. rendered in Saiii Kant Singh (supra) & Gopesh Kurnar Verma^ (supra), subject to verlfication offacts. !n view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearlng for the psSitioner nothing survives in:: this petttion for sdjydication. Accordingly, ths writ pefition is disposed of, Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge .-1;: