IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.611 of 2008 GAYA NAND SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 7/05/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. appearing for the State. The petitioner is the brother of the informant of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that from a bare perusal of the first information report it would appear that the allegation of causing death is being levelled against the petitioner only on the ground that there was strong motive. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that simply because the deceased had disclosed before the police levelling allegation against the petitioner and others, this alone cannot be a ground for committing murder of the deceased. Moroever, no one has seen committing the murder. The dead body has been found in the house of the deceased himself and the case of the informant is that the deceased was murdered somewhere else and his dead body was brought in the room. He also contended that it is not possible that the murder was committed somewhere else and the dead body was brought in the house and no body of the village saw the occurrence or carrying the dead body to the house of the informant. The contention of the learned counsel is that the deceased and the informant are own Pattidars and on account of domestic differences between them, the petitioner has been falsely implicated. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner Gaya - 2 - Nand Singh is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in Raniganj P.S. Case No. 205/2007. (Rekha Kumari, J.) AMIN