y HIGH C.OURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No.3724/1998 CORAM: Hon'ble Shri S.R.Nayak, ChiefJustice & Hon'ble Shri D.R.Deshmukh, J. PETITIONERS /.--c 1. Jeshtha Nagrik Sangh, Through its Vice- President^adlTukar Rao Watwe s/o Shri Anand Watve, aged about 62 years, r/o TilakNagar, Bilaspur. 2. Krashnakumar Dua alias Sushil Dua s/o Shri Late Kashiram Dua, aged about % years, Businessman, r/o Sarkanda, Bilaspur. 3. Heeralal, s/o Shri Mgngilal Agrawal, aged about 40 years, Businessman, r/o fmlipara near Geeta Lodge, Bilaspur. 4. Manoharrao Tamaskar s/o late Shri Krashnarao Tamaskar, aged about 80 years, Advocate, r/o Tilak Nagar, Bitaspur. 5. Bhupendra Rao Tamaskar s/o late Shri Krashnarao Tamaskar, aged about SQ years, Engfneer Raymonds Cement Works, R/o Tilak Nagar, Bilaspur. 6. Govindrao Bodbole s/o Shri Balkrashna Rao Godbole, aged about 80 years. Advocafe, r/o Tilaknagar, Bilaspur. 7. Ku. Bindulata Shrivastava D/o late Shri Radhakrashan Shrivastava. aged about 58 years, Advocato, r/o Vinoba Nagar, Bilaspur. 8. Jyotibhushan Singh, s/o Shri Rudrapratap Narayan Singh, aged about 53 years, Ex- Jamindar of Korba, r/o Titak Nagar, Bilaspur. 9. Smt. Lata Madhukar Kalaskar, W/o Shri Madhulcar Govind Kalaskar, aged about 57 years, r/o Parijat Colony, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur. 10. Smt. Vasudha Sudhakar W/o Shri Sudhakarrao Mendekar, aged about 150 years, Parijat Colony, H/2-Nehru Na^ar, Bilaspur. i €- RESPONDENTS: 11. Krashna Agrawal s/o Shri Pawan Agrawal, aged about 72 yeare, Businessman, r/o Naya Sarkanda, Bilaspur. Versus 1. Stats of Madhya Pradesh, Through : Secretary, Department of Local Self & Urban Administrative Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhavan, Bhopal. » 2. The Municipal Corporation, through : its Commissioner, Bilaspur. Shri Manindra Shrivastava, learned Sr. Counsef with Shri Amrfto Das, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri Vinay Harit, iearned Dy. Advocate General for ttie State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on02.08.2006) The fotlowing ora! order of the Court was passed by S.R.NAYAK, C.J. At the time of hearing, it was brought to our notice that the impugned Rule has bsen subsequently amended. In that view of the matter, this writ petition does not survive for-decision-making. It is accordingly disposed of. —-,- *]an4 us- ^1 Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge