hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10302 OF 2010 Habibulla Ghurau Shaikh ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr. S.G. Surana i/by Mr. Yogesh Bandal for respondent nos. 3 and 4. Mr. A.I. Patel, A.G.P. for respondent no. 1. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : JUNE 27, 2011 P.C. Petitioner was absent on the last occasion but his son Mr. Rafiq Ahmed was present. It was made clear to him that the writ petition will be disposed of finally and particularly in the light of the observations in the order of the competent authority. The matter was adjourned till today. Today the petitioner and his son as also their advocate are absent. Mr. Surana appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 3 and 4 has invited my attention to the order dated 6th May, 2011 passed by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority holding that the petitioner Habibulla Shaikh is eligible for permanent alternative accommodation. Mr. Surana makes a statement that respondent nos. 3 and 4 have accepted this order and are ready and willing to make available temporary alternative accommodation for petitioner so also permanent alternative accommodation in terms of the order. In fact the permanent alternative accommodation is also ready and can be taken possession of by the petitioner at any time. In the light of these statements made by Mr. Surana, on instructions, nothing survives in the this petition which is dismissed. The copy of the order dated 6th May, 2011 is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)