1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Civil Application No. 2388 of 2008 IN Contempt Petition No. 36 of 2008 [Mrs. Ushakiran Dwivedi Vs. Vilas Bhansari & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. N.K. Dwivedi, Advocate for the applicant- petitioner. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 01st April,2008. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner believes that the opening words of the Order dated 7th March, 2008 passed by this Court, namely “No case for cognizance is made out.”, do not leave the order passed by this Court permitting withdrawal simpliciter, and he prays for expunging the said sentence. 3. According to learned Advocate Mr. Dwivedi, the above quoted words are causing prejudice to the petitioner. 2 4. The Court has observed about the case to be unworthy of cognizance and hence made said observation and has later specifically directed that the Contempt Petition is disposed of as withdrawn due to the request made. Therefore, the observations contained in the order cannot, in any manner, prejudice the petitioner, particularly when the petitioner has no intention to file a fresh Contempt Petition on the same grounds. 5. In view of this, no interference is called for. Civil Application is, therefore, rejected. Judge |Hedau|