1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No. 418 of 2010 [Jagannath Rajaram Ghuge Vs. State of Mah. & another] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Ms. T.H. Udeshi, Adv., [appointed] for the petitioner. Mr. V.A. Thakre, APP for respondent nos. 1 and 2. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND P.B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : 14th September, 2010. 1. Perused the Letter-Petition. Heard learned Adv. Ms. T.A. Udeshi [appointed] for the petitioner and learned APP Mr. V.A. Thakre for the respondents. 2. Cumulative cut in the remission suffered by the petitioner is 1315 days being five times the days of delay in reporting to the Jail after availing the parole. 3. First punishment refers to 2000, second to 2002 and third to 2004. 4. It is clear that these acts of omission are petitioner s own deeds. 5. Had the petitioner found some fault in 2 the Executive action, he could have agitated and challenged the same at the relevant time. Challenge to the punishments awarded in the past, which are almost six to ten years old, cannot be opened after such a long delay. 6. Moreover, the petitioner is aware of his own deeds. He cannot be ignorant of his duty to report to the Jail in time. He has to suffer for his lapses. 7. Treating this petition even as a mercy petition, no indulgence can be granted. 8. Petition has no merit, and is rejected. Judge Judge |Hedau|