IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11678/2008 Decided on:23.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Bhimo Ram. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others.…Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjay jaswal, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ansul Bansal, Addl. A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. Sanjay Jaswal has placed on record copy of mandays’ chart duly issued by the Assistant Engineer and counter-signed by the Executive Engineer. Petitioner has worked continuously from 1993 onwards and had completed 240 days in each calendar year. 2. Consequently, the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by their Lordships of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhaya 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others, 1994 Supp (2) SCC 316. 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization in accordance with the principles laid down in above cited judgment with all the consequential benefits, within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 23.12.2010 *awasthi*