IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. ORDER S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.2623/2006 09.04.2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Shri Shiv Charan Gupta, for the appellant. Shri Rajesh Mootha, for the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the impugned judgment dated 21.7.2006 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ramganj Mandi District Kota on the application filed under order 39 rules 1 and 2 CPC by the respondents who are plaintiffs in a suit for cancellation of the sale deed executed in favour of the appellant defendant. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that though the learned trial court has passed the order of injunction restraining the revenue officers not to alter the revenue entries in respect of the land in dispute but at the same time the plaintiff should also be restrained not to alienate or encumber the property during the pendency of the suit. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the same. In the facts and circumstances having considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the parties it is directed that in addition to injunction passed by the learned trial court dated 21.7.2006 it is further directed that the plaintiff shall also maintain status quo in respect of the land in dispute and shall not alienate or encumber the property in dispute during the pendency of the suit. Subject to the above this misc. appeal is disposed of. The Registry is directed to return the record immediately to the court concerned. (DALIP SINGH),J. Ramchandrkhatri,PS