In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 3203 of 2005 Date of Decision: November 06 , 2007 Gobind Ram and Another …Petitioners Versus Municipal Committee, Gohana. …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Harish Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners. RAJESH BINDAL, J. The challenge in the present petition is to the order dated November 22, 2004, passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gohana, and order dated May 26, 2005, passed by learned Additional District Judge, Sonepat, whereby the application filed by appellants/plaintiffs under order 39 Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC was dismissed. At the time of motion hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners could not intimate this Court regarding status of the suit as the present petition arose out of orders dated November 22, 2004, and May 26, 2005, in a suit which was filed on November 10, 2004. On inquiry by this Court from learned trial Court, it was revealed that the suit itself stood disposed of on December 15, 2006. In this view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge November 06, 2007 “DK”