IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 6818 of 2008 Between: Labour and Employees Union M.C.H(Registration No.B-685) Rep.by its President office at MCh Complex Building Tank Bund Road Hyderabad Rep.by its President Sri Pratap Singh S/o.Sri Taveriya H.No.23-4-545 Sulthanshahi Hyd ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner and Special Officer G.H.M.C, MCH Complex Building Tank Bund Road Hyd 2 The Zonal Commissioner(Central Zone) G.H.M.C Khairatabad Hyderabad- 50004 .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in seeking to allot the maintenance of engineering toilets of circle VIII (old circle IV numbering (8) toilets to 3rd parties ignoring the claim of the petitioner union as illegal arbitrary unjust and unconstitutional besides being violative of principles of natural justice while issuing a consequently directions to the respondents to continue the velmiki seva samaja sangh to maintain the engineering toilets in circle VIII(Circle VI) numbering (8) in all in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.D.GOVERDHANACHARY Counsel for the Respondents.: R.RAMACHANDRA REDDY,SC FOR MCH 1,2,4&6 . The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition has been filed by Labour and Employees Union, MCH (Registration No.B-685), rep. by its President assailing the action of the respondents in seeking to allot the maintenance of engineering toilets of Circle VIII (Old Circle VI) numbering 8 toilets to third parties ignoring the claim of the petitioner-Union. 2. When the writ petition came up for admission, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner-Union. Sri R. Ramachandra Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submits that there are some other toilets which remain un-allotted to any one and if the petitioner-Union is interested, it is at liberty to approach the respondents and the respondents will consider to allot the same to the petitioner- Union in accordance with the procedure. 3. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage directing the petitioner-Union to submit a representation to the 2nd respondent seeking allotment of toilets for maintenance and on such representation, the respondents shall consider the same in accordance with the procedure in vogue as on this day. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:11th August, 2008. cs ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MSN}