ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 98 OF 2008 SUMMONS NO. 98 OF 2008 SUMMONS NO. 98 OF 2008 IN IN IN LETTERS LETTERS LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (L) NO. 224 OF 2007 PATENT APPEAL (L) NO. 224 OF 2007 PATENT APPEAL (L) NO. 224 OF 2007 IN IN IN SUMMONS SUMMONS SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.523 OF 2006 FOR JUDGMENT NO.523 OF 2006 FOR JUDGMENT NO.523 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2302 OF 2006 SUIT NO. 2302 OF 2006 SUIT NO. 2302 OF 2006 Supreme Alloys Industries & 2 Ors. ...Appellants. Vs. Ganpatlal Mangilal Jain ...Respondent. Mr.A.Roy i/by M/s. Roys Law Firm for the Appellants. Mr.Suresh Gole a/w. Ms. Sandhya Amin for the Respondent. Mr.J.S.Saluja, for the Taxing Master. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 7TH FEBRUARY, 2008 : 7TH FEBRUARY, 2008 : 7TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the Appellants, the learned counsel for the Respondent and the learned counsel for the Taxing Master. 2. We have perused the order dated 09/08/2007 of the Taxing Master. We have also perused the order of the learned Single Judge dated 16th January, 2007, whereby the learned Single Judge had decreed the above summary suit in terms of prayers (a) and (b) and the Summons ( 2 ) for Judgment was made absolute, on the ground that the Appellants have not applied for leave to defend. Even in the Memo of Appeal, it is very categorically mentioned that the Appellants are challenging the Judgment and Order dated 16th January, 2007 and in ground "B", challenge is expressly made with regard to the decree dated 16th January, 2007 which is passed on the ground that the leave is not granted. Under these circumstances, the Judgment of the learned Taxing Master directing the Appellants to pay the entire Court-fee amount cannot be faulted. 3. The above Chamber Summons is totally devoid of merits, hence stands dismissed. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)