1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty First day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13900 of 2011 MUNIYANDI @ DANIEL ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SANKARANKOVIL TOWN POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CR NO.555/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.VEILKANI RAJU Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDI, Addl.Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is one of the accused in Crime No.555 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offence under Sections 417, 418, 420, 294(b) and 506(ii) I.P.C. The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 26.08.2011. He has come forward with this petition seeking bail. 2. According to the case of the prosecution, the petitioner is the first accused. His wife owns a property comprised in Survey No.319/B in Sankarankovil Town. The allegation is that the wife of the petitioner has approached the de-facto complainant and offered to sell the property for a sum of Rs.3,10,000/-. Based on an oral agreement, the de-facto complainant paid a sum of RS.50,000/-as advance. Subsequently, the petitioner and his wife have declined to execute the sale deed. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the allegation would make out only a civil dispute. He would further submit that his wife never promised to sell the property at all. 4. I have considered the above submissions. 5. Having regard to the above disputed fact and also the fact that the allegation makes out a civil dispute, I am of the view that the petitioner is entitled for bail. Therefore, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner,but with stringent conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 6. In the result, this petition is ordered and bail is granted to the petitioner on the following conditions: (i) The Petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil, and (ii) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, everyday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks. sd/- 21/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SANKARANKOIL. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SANKARANKOIL TOWN POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 4 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI. 5 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/S. M.VEILKANI RAJU Advocate SR.No.36557 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13900 of 2011 Date :21/10/2011 PA/21.10.2011/2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/