IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2941 of 2011 VIVEKA NAND PRASAD & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.03.2011. Heard learned counsels of the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 452, 380 of the I.P.C. and Section 3(X) of S.C./S.T.Act. The accusation is of abuse and assault. Though it is submitted that the petitioner no.2, Satendra Kumar Sao @ Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra Sao lodged the case against the informant on earlier point of time and the present case is a counter blast. Since anticipatory bail of Savitri Devi and other has been rejected by this Court, I am not inclined to interfere. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioners and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day if 2 the petitioners surrender and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today considering the fact as submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that Savitri Devi and others have been enlarged on regular bail. With this observation, this application is disposed off. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)