IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 338 of 2003 (S/B) Rajendra Nath Verma S/o Late Sri Jageswar Nath Verma, R/o 44 Nandpuri, Jwalapur, Haridwar. …….. Petitioner Versus 1. Uttaranchal Pay Jal Sansadhan Vikas Evam Nirman Nigam, through its Managing Director, having its registered office at Dehradun. 2. Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Uttaranchal Pay Jal Sansadhan Vikas Evam Nirman Nigam, Dehradun. …….. Respondents Mr. A.K. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Dalakoti, Advocate on behalf of Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate for the respondents. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Mr. A.K. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Dalakoti, Advocate on behalf of Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate for the respondents. 2. Mr. Manish Dalakoti, the learned Counsel for the respondents submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of Superintending Engineer has, now, become infructuous, as the petitioner, during the pendency of the writ petition, has been promoted to the post of Superintending Engineer. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 04.08.2006 04.08.2006 G