HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. : 36 of 2002. Decided on: 1.8.2008. Satyam Shankaranarayana Joint Venture. ……… Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. ………Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioner: Mr.M.M. Khanna, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Goverdhan Sharma, Advocate. For respondents No.1 to 4: R.M. Bisht and Mr.Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate Generals. For respondent No.5: Mr.Baldev Singh, Advocate. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral): CWP No.36 of 2002 and CMP No.1304 of 2008. The State has filed an application for placing on record the orders passed by different authorities subsequent to the filing of the petition, alongwith the affidavit of Shri R.D. Dhiman, Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh. Alongwith the affidavit, order dated 18.10.2002, passed by the Revisional Authority has also been filed wherein the Revisional Authority has set aside the assessment order, which was impugned in the present writ petition. In view of this subsequent development, this petition does not survive and is rejected. We may, however, make it clear that the parties shall be free to __________________ Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. - 2 - raise all the grounds and contentions in proceedings subsequent to the order, dated 18.10.2002. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. In view of the final disposal of the main petition, all the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Deepak Gupta), Judge. August 1, 2008. (V.K. Ahuja), (TILAK) Judge.