IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35522 of 2009 RADHE MAHTON Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 30.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner was taken into custody since 27.7.2009 in relation to Jamui P.S. Case No. 163 of 2009 which came to be instituted for the offence under sections 341, 323, 324,307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission of learned counsel is that there was dispute within the family with regard to partition of the property in question and for the minor altercation a serious colors has been given by the informant only to take revenge. Petitioner is not a professional criminal having any criminal history. Even if the allegation is prima facie accepted to be true it was per at a moment offence and the petitioner shown his indulgence. If he is released on bail he will not take law in his hand. Keeping the background of the dispute and litigation, let the petitioner, namely, Radhe Mahton be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Jamui P. S. Case No. 163 of 2009. Both the sureties to be executed by the blood relations of the petitioner on due identification by the court below. Petitioner is further directed not to indulge in any kind of - 2 - criminal activity and will not intimidate witnesses of the case. Petitioner will cooperate in the trial by appearing on each and every date fixed in the case either by himself or through his counsel. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)