IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL REV. NO. 3803 OF 2008 DECIDED ON : 20.10.2008 Raj Rani ...Petitioner versus Shanti Devi ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. S. AHLUWALIA Present : Mr. Rakesh Bakshi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Karan Nehra, Advocate, for the respondent. K. S. AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) A perusal of the order passed by the Rent Controller, whereby prayer of the respondent-tenant to lead additional evidence was declined, reveal that various opportunities were availed by the tenant to conclude her evidence. It has been held that the present application has been filed only to delay the proceedings and linger on the case. It has been further stated that on these facts respondent had cross examined the witnesses. The order passed by the Rent Controller is an interlocutory order. It is not amenable to revisional jurisdiction. Even otherwise, I do not find any reason to interfere with the order passed by the Rent Controller. Dismissed. OCTOBER 20, 2008 (K. S. AHLUWALIA) shalini JUDGE