IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 16 OF 2010 MR. RIAZ SHAIK ... Petitioner Versus MRS. RADHA N. KALRO AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Shri Shivan Dessai, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri C. Mascarenhas, Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 16th August, 2010 P.C.:- Heard learned Counsel. There is no dispute that Criminal Case Nos. 38/OA/NI/2007/E, 39/OA/NI/2007/F, 41/OA/NI/2007/A, 42/OA/NI/2007/E, 43/OA/NI/2007/F and 44/OA/NI/2007/F arise from the same agreement and the parties are the same. In other words, the complainant and the accused are both common. There is also no dispute that cases nos. 40/OA/NI/2007/F, 45/OA/NI/2007/II and 46/OA/NI/2007/E arise out of the same agreements and although the accused is the same, the complainant is different. The application is for transfer of all the cases to one Court. That request of the Petitioner/Accused has been declined by the learned Sessions Judge by Order dated 18-12-2009. It is submitted that evidence in 45/OA/NI/2007/II has been completed and the case is otherwise fixed for 313 statement. It is desirable that all the cases are tried by the same Court as that will save lot of judicial time as well as inconvenience to the parties/pleaders. All the cases therefore are hereby directed to be tried by the learned J.M.F.C. where the case no. 38/OA/NI/2007/E is pending. The learned J.M.F.C. is directed to complete the trials of the six cases as expeditiously as possible, and in any event within six months and dispose of the same. It is clarified that the trial in six cases will not be common though all the cases will be decided at the same time, and by the same Magistrate. Parties to appear before the learned Magistrate on 23-8-2010 at 2.30 p.m. Criminal Writ Petition disposed of, accordingly. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.