(Spl. - H.C.A.S. C.D., 78-e) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA PANAJI – GOA APPELLATE SIDE MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 764 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 627 OF 2003 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Quorum appearances, Court's orders, or directions and Court's or Judge's Orders. Registrar's orders. Applicant present in person. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, Advocate General with Mr. H.D. Naik, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & N.A. BRITTO, JJ. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER, 2004. P.C. The main grievance raised in Writ Petition No.627 of 2003 is regarding promotion. Even, if the petitioner succeeds in the writ petition, this Court can also mould the relief and direct the State Government to pay the consequential benefits and, therefore, the request of the applicant for listing the petition for early hearing, on the ground that he is due to retire in April, 2005, cannot be accepted. Misc. Civil Application is, therefore, rejected. The petition be listed for final hearing in due course. B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. N.A. BRITTO, J. ssm