1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2423 OF 2005 Ram Sambhajirao Gundile .. petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondent. --- None for the petitioner Mr. B.V. Wagh, AGP for respondent No.1. Mr. S.P. Shah, Advocate holding for Mr. P.S. Shendurnikar,for the respondent NO.2 Mr. R.A. Tambe, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & N.D.DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE : 26th August, 2009. ORAL ORDER :- 1] Though the matter was called out twice, none appears for the petitioner. We could have dismissed the matter for default. However, in the interest of justice, we have also perused the merits of the matter. 2 2] The petitioner has sought relief to the effect that the petitioner be granted permission to pay the amount of loan as and when the motor car is received by him from the respondent No.3. He has sought for stay of the auction sale of the land of the petitioner till then. The petitioner has also prayed for a direction to enquire into the matter as to why the respondent No. 3 is not giving the motor car to the petitioner. 4] We are afraid, as to whether such reliefs could be granted in the extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The dispute appears to be between the petitioner and the respondent No.3. The jurisdiction of this court can not be permitted to be invoked for settling the dispute between the two private parties. In that view of the matter, no merits is found in the mater. The same is dismissed. [N.D. DESHPANDE, J.] [B.R. GAVAI,J.] Grt/-