THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.10607 OF 2010 ORDER: Heard Sri Sreenivasa Rao Velivela, Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri R. Ramachandra Reddy, Learned Standing Counsel for the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation. At their request the Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission. The petitioner claims to be the absolute owner and to be in possession of house property admeasuring 162.4 square yards in Premises No.10-5-351, Plot No.2, Survey No.845/1 to 7 situated at Tukaramgate, North Lallaguda, Secunderabad. It is his case that he submitted an application on 12.04.2010 seeking permission of the 1st respondent for construction of the building but the respondents refused to receive the same on the ground that the application was not accompanied with a TSLR Certificate and a No objection Certificate from the revenue authorities. In more or less similar circumstances this Court, in Hyderabad Potteries Private Limited v. Collector, Hyderabad[1] and J. Rajini v. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (Judgment in W.P. No.7531 of 2010 dated 07.04.2010), held that a local authority could not insist on production of the T.S.L.R. Certificate or a No Objection Certificate from the Revenue authorities. Following the said judgments, the respondents are directed to receive and process the application of the petitioner for construction of the building without insisting on production of T.S.L.R. certificate and No Objection Certificate from the Revenue authorities. The respondents shall, however, ensure that the provisions of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955, the Rules, Regulations and the building bye-laws made thereunder are adhered to while considering the petitioner’s application for grant of building permission. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. However, in the circumstances, without costs. Date: 30.04.2010 ___________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J MRKR [1] 2001(3) ALD 600