IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42015 of 2009 RANJAN SHARMA, son of Bishundeo Sharma, resident of village – Faridpur, P.S. – Jamalpur, District – Munger. --------------- Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Saraswati Devi, W/o – Ranjan Sharma, D/o – Suchit Sharma, resident of village – Shivnagar, P.S. – Piribazar, District – Lakhisarai. ------ Opposite Parties. ------- 07. 23.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named accused in complaint case being husband of the complainant. During the course of argument, it is submitted on behalf of the Bar that the parties are ready and willing to resume their marital life and consume the same at petitioner’s place. If it is so, the petitioner and opposite party no.2 the complainant both are to appear before the court below at or before 13th September 2010 with a petition for compromise stating their intentions affixing pair photographs and group photographs with the family members. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and on filing of such petition and appearance, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, let the petitioner namely, Ranjan Sharma, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, - 2 - Lakhisarai, in connection with Complaint Case No. 543C of 2008, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court below shall permit the couple to resume and lead their marital life at petitioner’s place and shall have watch over their conduct for a reasonable period, direct them to be physically present on the dates fixed only after being satisfied of their good conduct, the court below shall pass appropriate order. Till the date fixed for appearance, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court below through Fax at the cost of the petitioner. Rajeev/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)