\^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M^C^C^NQ. J.82 QF 2011 APPLICANTS/ Appellant RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. VERSUS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Mangla Ram, S/o Shiv Nath, aged about 45 years, Ashok Kumar, S/o Shiv Nath, aged about 42 years, Dileshwar, S/o Shiv Nath, aged about 29 years, All Oraon Tribals, R/o village Khokso Benjora, Tahsil Jashpurnagar, District Raigarh (M.P.) [Now District Jashpur (C.G.)] Jagarnath S/o Jagmohan, aged about 57 years, Brijnath S/o Jagmohan, aged about 55 years, Lalita D/o Jagmohan, aged about 52 years, Ram Gulam S/o Jagmohan, aged about 50 years, Rameshwar S/o Jagmohan, aged about 57 years, Vijay S/o Dhanna, aged about 24 years, Smt. Rikhi Wd/o Dhanna. Aged about 45 years, Ajay S/o Dhanna, aged about 25 years, All -R/o village Khokso Benjora, Tahsil Jashpurnagar, District Raigarh (M.P.) [now District Jashpur (C.G.)] State of Madhya Pradesh (now Chhattisgarh), through the Collector, Raigarh (now Jashpur). APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF S.A. N0. 150 OF 1995. (SB :Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present: Mr. H.S. Patel, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. U.K.S. Chandel, P.L. for the State/respondent No. 9. Respondents No. 1 to 8 not noticed. ORAL- ORDER (Passedon 04/04/2011) 1. Present restoration petition has been filed after 27 days of its limitation. -^- \: 2. Heard on I.A. No. 01, application for condonation of delay in filing the restoration petition. 3. On due consideration, I.A. No. 01 is allowed. Delay in filing the restoration petition is hereby condoned. 4. Also heard on restoration petition. 5. On due consideration, I am satisfied that petitioners have explained the cause for their non-appearance when the case was called out far hearing. Consequently, restoration petition is allowed. S.A. No. 150 of 1995 dismis^sed for want ofprosecution is restored in its original number. No order as to costs. ^a/" T.P. Sharma Judge ^