'i.a '> HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH^ BJIA^PUR W.R^No. 4294 of2007 PBTITIONER Baba Vidyaaafh Aoghar Higher Secoadary School Khisora (Balouda) Distnct, Jaajgir Chanapa, Througfa Its Principal Islam. Mohaaunad Qureshi. ycrsus RESPONDBNTS l. State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough Its Secretaiy Middle Education Division, Peusion Bada, Raipur(CG) 2. Divisioiial Officer, C.G. Middle Education, Bflaspur (CG) 1 3. Distnct Education Officer, Jaajgir Cham.pa(CG) Appearance: Shri S.K.Mishra, coT.msel for fhe petitioner. Shri Yashwaat Siagh, Govenuaent Advocate for the State on adyance copy. ORALORDER (25.07.2007) SUmL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on adinission. The petitidner, which is aa educatioual iastitution, runs classes up to Higher Secondary acid it was duly recognized by the C.G. Madhyanuk Shiksha Maadal, Raipur vide recogiution certificate Annexure P-7 and fhe period of last recogiution was from 1.7.2006 to 30.6.2007. Leamed couasel submits that thereafter, a show cause notice has been issued to the Institutidn vide Annexure P-14 ori 26. 12.2006, caUiag upon them. to show cause on the poitits No.l tQ 11, ineiitioned ia the said notice. He submits that the reply of the said notice has already been filed, but ftle authorities are not taking aay decision pn fhe said reply. The reUef claiaxed ia fhe petition perused. A •Ki 'l (2) ; W.R(ONo.4294/2007 The petitioner has inamly sought relief, coininaading the respondeuts to graat recognition to fhe petitioner/ School for the Acadeinic Session 2007-2008. In the facts and ciFcuiastarices of fhe case, siace the niatter is pendnig at fhe stage of Show Cause before the said authority, it would not be just aiid proper for this Court to iaterfere ia the inatter at this stage. It is not a case, where fhe petitioner has questioned fhe notice of Show Cause to be wifhout jurisdiction etc. It has prayed fbr a direction regarding renewal of recognitiort even during the pendency of the inatter before the C.G. Madhyamik Shiksha Maudal, Raipur. The petition appears to be inisconceived and pre-iuatured, It caiuiot be entertamed at ttus stage, when the fiiial decision has ubt been taken by the C.G. Madhyamik Shiksha Maadal, Raipur, as stated by leamed counsel for fhe petitioner. The petition is suTnmarily disnussed, at this stage. However, fhe petitioner shafl be at liberty to repeat fhe prayer after final decision is taken by the concemed Board, if it would be advisable to theru. In view ofthe above, I.A.No. 1 for graat ofiutermi reliefand I.A.Np.2 for ui^ent hearing staad disposed of. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge <1 sunita e^ss-^s^SfeSsS.f