IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19870 of 2010 ASHOK KUMAR CHOUDHARY & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. S.P. Srivastava, Advocate Mr. Santosh Bharti,Advocate For the State: Mr.Prabhat Kumar, A.C. to G.A.III For State Election Commission: Mr. R.S. Pradhan, Senior Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh,Advocate ---------- 2. 14.12.2010 Heard learned counsels for the parties. The petitioners have again approached this Court for quashing the orders dated 19.5.2005 and 10.5.2005, by which their services were dispensed with. Earlier also, the petitioners had approached this Court against the very same orders by filing C.W.J.C. Nos.10126/2006 and 10801/2006. The said writ applications were dismissed/disposed of taking note of the fact that they had been engaged on a purely ad-hoc basis for the purpose of specific election and no direction can be issued by this Court for their re-engagement giving liberty in one of the cases to the petitioners to approach the State Election Commission for the purpose. Learned counsel for the petitioners is unable to show as to how the same issue can be re- agitated by filing a fresh writ petition when - 2 - their earlier writ petitions with respect to the same issue have been dismissed/disposed of by this Court. The writ application is, accordingly, dismissed as not maintainable. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )