•h5^''":,. """-^^ ^aSi,, "!\ /"'"'._ 'l > '»J. ( £-^~: ;^^'\-^ ;,1^' HIGH COLIRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPIJR !»' R.K. Tiwari, S/o Late Sliri Vrasadi Lal Tiwari, Aged about 65 yeafs, R/'o Near Natiire Cure Hospital, C/10, Anaud Vihar, Raipur, Distt. Raipiir Cliliattisgarh. 1. Food Coqioration oflndia, Through: Managing Director, Head Quarter-New Dehli, 16-20 ]^rakhamba Lane, New DeUii. 2. Tlie Executive Director, Food Coq?oration of Indai, Dhii-aj Anna Biiildmg, Near Anatri Kanekar Police Statioii, Bandra (East) Mumbai-400051. 3. The General Manager, Food Ccwporation of India, Ring Road Chouraha, Telibandha, Raipur CMiattisgarh. 4. The Area Manager, Food Corporatidn oflndia, Madeena Building, Jai! Road, Raipur, Clihattisgarii. 5. The Employees Provident Fund Orgaiiization, 'ITiroug}i: Cotnniissioner, Regional Office, 8 & 9 Floor, Mayur Bhawaii, Comiaught Circus, New Deihi-1. m'RIT PBTITION IFNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) SR; Hon'ble Mr. Salish K. 'resent : Shri Pawan Srivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Kumar Shanna, Advocate on behalfofShri B.P. Gupta, Advocate for tlie respondent No. 1 to 4. (Passed on 16 ofjanuar}', 2008) 1. Leamed couiisel appeariiig for the petitioner subniits that the petitioner does not waiit to press this petition on merit except that the petitioner be pennitted to make a representatio" in tenns ofthe order dated 24.10.2007 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 6302./2007 (R.B. Uikey Vs. Food Corporation oflndia and Others). 2 Shri Arvmd Kumar Shanna, leamed eomse! appearing on behaif of Sliri i.P. Gifpta, Advocate for the respondent No. 1 to 4 liave no objection. 3. The petitioa is accordiiigly disposed of in the same terms as under: "Accordingly, it is directed that if so advised, the petitioner may file a detailed representatioii before respondent No. 1 aloiigwith a eopy ofthis order and a copy ofthe Writ Petition within a period of 3 weeks fix»m today and if such a representation is filed and the concemed documeiits of the petitioner have not been forwarded by respondeiit No. 1 to respondent No. 5, respondent No. 1, in tiim, shall examine the poiiits raised by the petitioner and forward the papers relatiiig to the pengion ofthe petitioner to respondent No. 5 withiti a period of 60 days fi-oni the date of receipt of the said representation or shall dispose of the representation iii accordance with law witliin the said period. Iii case, the concenied dociiments of the petitioner are already forwarded, this order shail cany ao force." Sahu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge