HIQHCOURT OFCHHAmSGARH: BILASPUR WriS Pstltion (S) No. 2677 of 2008 Satyendra Vir Pathak, aged about G3 years, son 6f Late Shri Dhanv/ant Singh Pathak, retireu Sub .Engineer, P.W.D. Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG), R/o. Near Diet Patrapara, Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh(CG), t* •^ R&spondents 1) State • of Chhattisgarh, throuah the Secretari/, Department of Pubiic. Works, Dau Kaiyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG$. 2) The Executive Erigineer, Public Works DeparfmenS, Division Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG). ; 3) The District Treasury Offioer, Distt. Raigarh (CG). 'ln'l" (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of india.) SB: Hon'bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri .A,N.Bhakta, counsel for the petltioneF, Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy.Advocate Genera! fortheState (Passedon 9th day of May, 20081 With oonsent of iearned counsei appearing for both the parties, the matter is heard finally. • 2) ' Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner at this stage, submits that the petitioner aoes not want to contest this matter on merit, except that the responaents authority be directedto decide the representation cssted 26-11-2007 (Annexure iP/3) pending before the respondents authority, expeditiously, in accordance with law. 3) Learned oounset appearing for the respondents/State submits that ihere is no reason asto why tbe representation, if pending iriay not be decided withinia reasonable time, in accordance with law. : 'i;ilr:::l'E'"":;^:::"'':^''';-:;J"'^''^'::':! :f:tin'tTR»wwewivwewisssww •|W(IKNI .•!W1>!>fU^»!BI ^l;-:, 2.- 4) In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direotion to respondents authorlty to consider and decide the aforesaid representation, ih accordance with law on its own merit, expeditiously. ij Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Raju