{1} Cri. Application No.3930/2009 drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3930 OF 2009 Rajesh Keshav Tare & others APPLICANTS VERSUS Kavita Rajesh Tare RESPONDENT ....... Mr.Girish Rane, Advocate for the applicants Mr.S.K.Adkine, Advocate for the respondent ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 23 rd August 2011 PER COURT: 1. By the present application, the applicants have challenged the order of issuance of process dated 12.03.2009 issued by 2nd JMFC, Jalgaon in RCC No.28/2009. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the applicants urge that the learned JMFC is not competent to take cognizance of the complaint in view of the fact that the applicants are residents of the area which is not within the jurisdiction of learned JMFC and secondly, that the complaint does not disclose cognizable offence and hence prayed that the process, {2} Cri. Application No.3930/2009 which is issued erroneously, be quashed and set aside. 3. Law is very settled as to how the process is to be issued. The process can be issued on the basis as to whether the averments in the complaint disclose commission of cognizable offence or not. Perusal of the complaint clearly demonstrate that though the applicants are not residents of the area within the jurisdiction of learned JMFC, Jalgaon, yet the alleged commission of the offence has taken place within the jurisdiction of JMFC, Jalgaon. Therefore, certainly, JMFC, Jalgaon is competent to entertain the complaint. Secondly, the contents of the complaint indicate that ingredients of the offence, for which process has been issued, have been disclosed. In the premise, I do not find any fault with the impugned order of issuance of process. Consequently, the application, which is sans merits, stands dismissed. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B11/criapln3930-09