IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17239 of 2002 RAM EKBAL DAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 5. 19.8.2010. None appears on repeated calls. On perusal of the materials placed on the record, it appears that the allegation of the complainant was of being defrauded by the officials of the bank in making payment of the loan amount and further that he had not applied for advancement of loan amount. The allegation is completely false and baseless inasmuch the complainant himself had paid up some of the installments of the loan and, thereafter, had stopped paying the installments. The court finds sufficient material to record that the complainant was attempting to avoid the liabilities which could be accruing against him to the bank for the non-payment of the loan and as such has lodged a frivolous prosecution against the officials of the / State Bank of India. In the result, the petition is allowed. The order taking cognizance passed by C.J.M., Saharsa on 21.3.2002 is hereby quashed as regards Saur Bazar P.S.Case No.93 of 2000. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )