1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 720 OF 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. FEBRUARY 17, 2006. Heard Shri Bhagwani, learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner – employee approached the Industrial Court making a grievance that Respondent No.2 is a sham and bogus contractor and he is direct employee of Respondent No.1 – Coal Survey Department. The Industrial Court found that as the very relationship of employer and employee is in dispute, it has no jurisdiction. The learned counsel contends that when the Contractor is alleged to be sham and bogus the enquiry as to the correctness of this assertion should have been undertaken by the Member, Industrial Court. In view of the law settled on the point and 2 as discussed in Hindustan Coca Cola Bottling S/W Pvt. Ltd. vs. Bhartiya Kamgar Sena & Ors., reported at 2001 (3) CLR 1025 and the recent judgment of Full Bench of this Court in the case of Tukaram Mandhare vs. Reymonds Woolen Mills, the view taken by the Industrial Court cannot be faulted with. No case is made out for interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.