IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No. 6796/2010 Ratan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan 29.7.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Naveen Kumar Sharma - for the petitioner Mr Paresh Chaudhary - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that accused petitioner has also received injuries by blunt object. He has falsely been implicated in the matter since he is a government servant. Thus, he may be granted benefit of anticipatory bail. Learned PP, on the other hand, has opposed the bail application. He submits that injuries caused by the petitioner to the complainant is on vital parts thus he may not be granted bail. After considering the rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. At this stage, learned counsel submits that petitioner may be given liberty to surrender before the court below with a direction to the court below to decide the bail application of the petitioner on the same day. In view of aforesaid, petitioner may surrender before the court below and if, on surrender, he files an application for bail then the court below may consider and decide the same expeditiously and, if possible, on the same day. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma