IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1972 of 2009 Vidya Mishra, S/o. late Aditya Mishra, R/o. Naya Tola, P.S. Lakhisarai, Distt. Lakhisarai. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, 2. Mahendra Mishra, S/o. late Aditya Mishra, 3. Mani Devi, W/o.Mahendra Mishra, Both r/o. Vill. Naya Tola, Chitranjan Road, Purani, Bazar, P.O.+ P.S. Lakhisarai, Distt. Lakhisarai. 4. Bachchi Devi, W/o. late Girja Nandan Pandey, R/o. Vill. Dariyapur, P.O. & P.S. Fathua, Distt. Patna. Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Advocate. Mr. Shankar Kumar, Advocate. Counsel for the State: Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta…. A.P.P. ---------------------------------- 02. 22.12.2011 The informant/petitioner has preferred this application against the judgment and order dated 21.11.2009 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No.V, Lakhisarai in Sessions Trial No. 693 of 1997 by which the accused O.P. No.2 Mahendra Mishra has been acquitted by giving him the benefit of doubt for the offences punishable under Sections 324, 447, 504/34 & 307/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The accused Mani Devi and Bachchi Devi O.P. Nos.3 & 4 respectively have not been found guilty under Sections 324 & 307/34 of I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act and both of them have been convicted under Sections 323, 447 & 504/34 of the I.P.C. and considering the facts and circumstances, age and antecedent, both of them have been released after due admonition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the 2 learned counsel for the State. On perusal of the impugned order it appears that the learned Addl. Sessions Judge has considered the evidence produced on behalf of the prosecution and has passed the impugned order, I do not find any illegality in the impugned order. Accordingly, this revision application is dismissed. Mkr. ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)