1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 289 OF 2009 Swati Manishkumar Pandure, Age 30 years, Occupation Household, Resident of Hanmantgaon, Taluka Rahata, District Ahmednagar Appellant V E R S U S Manish s/o Motilal Pandure, Age 34 years, Occupation Service, Resident of Pravaranagar, Taluka Rahata, District Ahmednagar Respondent Shri S.P. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for the appellant Shri V.D. Hon, Advocate for the respondent - sole CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 5th July, 2011 ORAL ORDER : The parties are present in person. They are identified by their Advocates. The parties produced on record the terms of the compromise. The terms of the compromise marked Exh.X-1. The parties agreed the contents of terms of compromise and admitted the contents of the same. In view of the terms of the compromise, the appeal stands dismissed. Decree be drawn according to terms of the compromise. ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. ) SRM/ 2