IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18105 of 2009 MOSTT.MAYA DEVI W/O LATE KAMESHWAR PANDEY R/O MOH AMBER, RAHUI ROAD, NEAR MUNNA HOUSE, P.O.BIHARSHARIF, DISTT- NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIF Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE NALANDA AT BIHAR SHARIF 3. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (ESTABLISHMENT) DISTT- COLLECTORIATE, NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIF 4. THE TREASURY OFFICER NALANDA AT BIHAR SHARIF 5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A&E) BIHAR, BEERCHAND PATEL, PATNA ----------- 4 07.04.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that during the pendency of the writ application the Accountant General has issued the necessary authorization for payment of the family pension as per Pen 07/PEN040210070136/206042P1 dated 16th February, 2010 as contained in Annexure-11 to the rejoinder to the counter affidavit of the respondent nos. 1 to 3. It is further submitted that the amount of family pension payable to the petitioner w.e.f. 14.11.1999 has been passed @ Rs. 1621/- instead of Rs. 1636/- and for removing the above discrepancy petitioner represented the grievances before the Accountant General by filing representation on 26.02.2010 (Annexure-12), however for expeditious disposal of the grievances petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Accountant General (respondent no.5). It is further contended that due to delay caused in fixing the family pension, the petitioner has been deprived of a substantial amount causing loss of interest, and as such, the petitioner is entitled to interest as per the Govt. Resolution dated 6th November, 1981 (Annexure- 13) and for that petitioner proposes to file a separate representation before the respondent no.2. In such view of the matter, in case such representations stating details of unpaid claims are filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the respective representations shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable could also be paid. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)