IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 1213 of 2010 Abdul Rehman and others ………. Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand and another ..…. Respondents with Criminal Misc. Application No. 1210 of 2010 Iddan Rehman and others ………. Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand and another ..…. Respondents Present : Sri D.C.S. Rawat, Advocate present for the applicants. Sri S.S. Adhikari, A.G.A. present for the State/respondent. Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. Sri D.C.S. Rawat, Advocate present for the applicants. Sri S.S. Adhikari, A.G.A. present for the State/respondent. Heard. These applications under section 482 Cr.P.C. have been moved by applicants Abdul Rehman, Shakeel, Iddan and Jumma for quashing the two FIR registered against them on the complaint filed by Ashok Kushal and Pradeep Kumar. In Criminal Misc. application No.1210 of 2010, learned counsel for the applicants contended that the complainant Pradeep Kumar is an Advocate and by taking under advantage of his legal knowledge, he has 2 dragged the applicants in unnecessary criminal proceedings. It is stated that incident took place with regard to the boundary as fields of the Ashok Kumar, Pradeep Kumar and the applicants are adjacent to each other. The applicant, Pradeep Kumar has filed the complaint which is fabricated and frivolous due to his personal grudge. According to the complainant, on 27.07.2010 applicants and their other family members threatened the complainant and had demolished the boundary of his field and diverted the water from their field towards the field of the complainant. Complainant being aggrieved filed the complainant before Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur. In Misc. application No.1213 of 2010, according to the complainant, has pleaded that the occurrence took place on 27.08.2010, when applicants caused injuries to the complainant Ashok Kushal and threatened him with dire consequences. He was medico-legally examined for the injuries received by him. However, the applicants have not placed on record the medical report. I have gone through the complaints of both the cases, other documents and annexures filed with the applications. From the perusal of the above documents that complainants being law abiding person have filed complaint in the court. On the other hand applicants have caused wrongful loss/damage to the property of complainants. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I do find any ground to interfere with order passed by the learned Judicial 3 Magistrate, Kashipur. The applications are dismissed accordingly. (Nirmal Yadav, J.) JKJ 21.12.2010