IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CONTEMPT CONTEMPT CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 404 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 404 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 404 OF 2007 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 1587 OF 2003 APPEAL NO. 1587 OF 2003 APPEAL NO. 1587 OF 2003 Lakshminarayan Baldev Gajraj Chaurasia ..Petitioner v/s Smt. Lakshmibai wd/o. Rambharose Chourasia and others. ..Respondents Mr. Nitin Mulya, Advocate, for the appellant None appeared for the respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: DATE: DATE: 25th March, 2008. 25th March, 2008. 25th March, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Against the decree for a specific performance of the contract, the parties filed consent terms on 22-4-2004 and on the basis of the consent terms the decree was drawn. The contempt petition is filed contending that certain terms from the said consent terms are not being : 2 : followed by the Respondents. As decree was drawn in terms of the consent terms, the decree can be executed as per the procedure laid down under the Civil Procedure Code. Therefore, I see no reason to take any action for contempt of court. The contempt petition stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)