1 lpa-284.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 284 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 357 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4716 OF 2000 Mahatma Phule Krida Prasarak Mandal and another. ... Appellants. V/s. Smt.Sumati Tukaram Kashid @ Sumati Vijay Borade and others. ... Respondents. Narendra Bandivadekar for the appellants. Smt.A.A.Agarwal for respondent No.1. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 8th March 2011. P.C. : Heard counsel for the parties. 2. Prima facie, we find force in the argument canvassed on behalf of the appellants that the Tribunal has clearly exceeded its jurisdiction. In that, in the appeal filed by respondent No.1 before Tribunal the relief claimed was specific to set aside 2 lpa-284.10 termination order dated 9th June, 1997, whereas the relief granted by the Tribunal in favour of respondent No.1 is to set aside the order dated 31st March, 1997 which is not a prayer in the appeal preferred by respondent No.1. Besides, the order of otherwise termination dated 9th June, 1997 which was the case of the respondent No.1, has not been dealt with by the Tribunal at all. 3. In the circumstances, appeal is admitted. Operation of the order of the Tribunal shall remain stayed during the pendency of the appeal. Civil application for stay is disposed of in the above terms. Hearing of the appeal is expedited. Liberty to apply. 4. Smt.Agarwal waives service on behalf of respondent No.1. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)