RSA No. 2236 of 1985 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 2236 of 1985 Date of decision: July 7, 2011 Kanshi Ram ...Appellant Versus Sadda Ram ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: None for the appellant. GURDEV SINGH, J. The appeal was called repeatedly, but no one has appeared on behalf of the appellant. It cannot be said that the learned counsel for theappellant has no notice of listing of this appeal, as he had appeared when the appeal was taken up on 3.1.2011 and was ordered to be listed on 13.1.2011. No such substantial question of law was formulated by the appellant/plaintiffs. After the perusal of the judgments of the lower courts and the record of the case, I have come to the conclusion that no such substantial question of law arises in the present appeal. The plaintiff claimed possession of the land on the basis of the title and the defendant claimed ownership on the basis of adverse possession. On the basis of the evidence on record, concurrent finding of facts were recorded by the lower RSA No. 2236 of 1985 2 courts that the defendant is coming in possession of the land in dispute for the last more than 16 years and that his possession is hostile, open, continuous and uninterrupted, which matured into ownership. When no such substantial question of law arises, this second appeal is not competent and is dismissed accordingly. July , 2011 (GURDEV SINGH ) prem JUDGE