IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-38712 of 2011 Date of Decision : 21.12.2011 Ranjan Kashyap …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondents ………. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. R.S. Rai, Senior Advocate for Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Mr. R.S. Rai, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner while placing reliance on the judgment of learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of Satinder Singh Vs. State of U.T. Chandigarh and another, reported in 2011(2) R.C.R. (Criminal) 89, has argued that offence punishable under Section 420 IPC does not find place under sub-section (4) of Section 82 Cr.P.C., therefore, order declaring the petitioner proclaimed offender is bad in law. He has further argued that petitioner shall surrender before the trial court within 15 days from today and shall seek regular bail therefrom, however, trial court be directed to expedite the trial and to conclude the same within such time as fixed by this Court in view of the acquittal of co-accused. He seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. However, if petitioner surrenders/appears before the trial court within 15 days from today and moves application seeking regular bail, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the trial court. ( Alok Singh ) December 21, 2011 Judge Anand