1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated :: 24..03..2011 Coram:: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE K.SUGUNA and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.ARUMUGHASWAMY Writ Petition (MD)No.2926 of 2011 M. Mookiya, S/o. Muthiya, Sokkalampatty, S. Sevalpatty Post, Thirupathur Taluk, Sivagangai District. ..Petitioner - Vs - 1. Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of Revenue Divisional Office, Devakkottai. 2. The Thasildar, Thirupathur, Sivagangai District. 3. O. Selvaraj, S/o. Oyyappan, Uddanpatty, S.Sevalpatty Post, Thirupathur Taluk, Sivagangai District. ......Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to take necessary steps to remove the encroachment in S.No.250/11,250/39 at Erumaipatty Group, S.S.Kottai Firka Thirupathur Taluk, Sivagangai District as per the representations of the petitioner dated 13.03.2008 and 04.03.2010. For Petitioner :: Mr.N.Sundareshan For Respondents :: Mr.R.Janakiramulu for R-1 and R-2 Special Government Pleader ORDER (Order of the Court was delivered by K. SUGUNA, J.) Though this writ petition is filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to take necessary steps to remove the encroachment in S.No.250/11,250/39 at Erumaipatty Group, S.S.Kottai Firka Thirupathur Taluk, Sivagangai District as per the representations of the petitioner dated 13.03.2008 and 04.03.2010, today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the second respondent to consider and dispose of his representation dated 04.03.2010. 2. In view of the limited relief that has been now sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition itself is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass suitable orders on the petitioner's representation dated 04.03.2010 in accordance with law, following the procedure contemplated under the relevant rules and after affording reasonable opportunity to all the parties concerned, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The second respondent / Thasildar is also directed to consider and dispose of the representation, if any, that has been made by the concerned individual seeking patta basing on the Government Orders issued in this regard. However, there will be no order as to costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (C.O.) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of Revenue Divisional Office, Devakkottai. 2. The Thasildar, Thirupathur, Sivagangai District. +1cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR.No.8307 Dpn akm/18.04.2011 /2p-4c/ W.P.(MD)No.2926 of 2011 24.03.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/