IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.278 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.278 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.278 OF 2005 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2854 OF 2005 Usmankhan Rashidkhan .. Applicant V/s Shaikh Yunus Shaikh Rahim .. Respondent Ms.Deepa S.Matwankar h/f Mr.J.N.Pawar for the Applicant. Ms.Preetam Tendulkar h/f M.S.Karnik for the Respondent. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : 2.12.2005. DATE : 2.12.2005. DATE : 2.12.2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Application, the Applicant is seeking condonation of 12 days delay in filing the Appeal. Perused the Civil Application. There is no affidavit in reply controverting the contentions in the Civil Application. Sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (A). 3. Place the L.P.A. for admission on 14.12.2005. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)