IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3894 of 2010 AMRENDRA SINGH, S/O LATE JAGDHARI SINGH, R/O VILL.- HARPUR KALA, P.S.- MAJARGANJ, DISTT.- SITAMARHI. ---------- Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------- Opp. Party ----------- 3 07.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by an order dated 17.9.2009 in Cr. Misc. No. 32711 of 2009 with an observation that the petitioner could renew his prayer for bail after completing his judicial custody for a further period of six months. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner in fact is in custody since 2.7.2009 and not only has completed six months of judicial custody as directed in the order dated 17.9.2009 but in fact has also remained in custody for more than one year in all. Considering this aspect, this Court would direct for release of the petitioner, namely, Amrendra Singh on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with 2 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.P. Pandey, Additional District Judge, F.T.C. IIIrd, Sitamarhi in S.Tr. No. 462 of 2009 in connection with Nanpur P.S. Case No. 91 of 2007. It is made clear that one of the bailors must be a Government servant and the other would be either of the parents of the petitioner. It would be also part of the condition for the petitioner remaining on bail under this order that he would absent himself in course of trial for two consecutive dates, his bail, so granted, shall be cancelled. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)