THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRL.R.C.NO.2215 OF 2010 ORDER: This revision is directed against the order dated 10-11-2010 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2830 of 2010 in C.C.No.370 of 2007 on the file of XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District. The petitioner herein is accused in C.C.No.370 of 2007. He filed Crl.M.P.2830 of 2010 under Section 45 of the Evidence Act to send demand promissory note and cheques which have been marked as Exs.P1 to P3 to the Forensic Science Laboratory to examine them under the tintle of examination to ascertain the age of ink. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the order impugned in the revision. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the documents are required to be sent to an expert for ascertaining the age of the ink. As seen from the impugned order in the revision, the document was once sent to expert and the expert expressed his opinion that the age of the ink on the documents cannot be ascertained. This factual aspect has been considered by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in dismissing the application. I do not find any illegality or irregularity warranting interference of this Court in the impugned order in exercise of powers under Sections 397 and 401 CrPC. The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed accordingly. __________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J rkk Dated: 1-12-2010