1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8146 OF 2010 Satish Kachru Salve ...Petitioner VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors. ...Respondents ..... Shri S.S.Jadhavar, advocate for the petitioner Shri K.M.Suryawanshi, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 to 3 ..... CORAM : R.S.MOHITE AND SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, JJ. DATED : 9 th September, 2010 PER COURT : 1 Heard Shri S.S.Jadhavar, advocate for the petitioner and Shri K.M.Suryawanshi, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 to 3. 2 By the present petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays that respondent nos. 2 and 3 be directed to restrain respondent no.4 from participating in the elections of Sarpanch and UpSarpanch of village Panchayat Panoli, 2 Taluka Parner, District Ahmednagar and alternatively prays that respondent nos. 2 and 3 be directed to postpone the elections of Sarpanch and Upsarpanch of the said village Panchayat till the dispute filed by the petitioner before respondent no.2 under Sections 14 and 16 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 is finally decided. 3 Admittedly, the petitioner has resorted to the provisions of Sections 14 and 16 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, by filing dispute on 30.8.2010, which is pending before respondent no.2, seeking disqualification of respondent no.4, copy whereof is produced at Exh. 'D' page 23, and therefore, there is no propriety in the present petition. 4 Hence, present petition stands dismissed summarily. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) dbm/wp8146.10