@ wwg ) Single Eengh; J IN THE HON’BLE HIGH gown OF CHHATTISGARH AT giLAgpvk w. P. (S) No. M1 91 /2&% &6@3 {‘x’anesh Vishvvas, S/ o Late Dwijendra Nath Vishwas, Aged about 51 years, Head Master Primary School Sarangpur Balrampur, Distt.—Surguja (C.G.) - PETITIONER / VER$U$ RESPONDENTS 1.7 State of Chhattisgarh Schedule Thmugh: Secretary, Caste/Schedule Tribes Development Department, Mantrayalay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. V/Collector (Tribal Development) Surguja, Ambikpur (C.G.) 3. K’Commissioner, Schedule Caste/ Schedule Tribes Development Deptt., Raipur (C.G.) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / W ®; My g“. . \ \0\0% § 78 M\:.Q:..Q§)....§1¥SII../ m 200 j Wm WWQTqrima) amWNWr-E SWmWW m. Rmm WW wm &ai1=aqar&m SE : HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITINKER D!WAKER_ 08.08.20G9 Shri Bhupendra Singh, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh T1” akur, Dy.A.G. for the: State‘ Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 30.6.2009 passed by respondent No.2 by which the petitioner who is working as Headmaster, Primary Schoo, Sarangpur, Balrampur has been ck Education officer, Udaipur, Distt. transferred to the office of’ Surguja on administrative gro nd. Contention of counsel f r the petitioner is that in the present place of posting the petitioner had joined on 8. 10.2008 and Within a period of ten months he h s again been shifted by the order ’ impugned. He further submit that nobody has been posted in place ‘ of the petitioner which shows hat there is no administrative exigency in passing the impugned order of transfer. .Counsel for the resp ndents/State submits that let‘ the petitioner make a suitable rep .sentation to the authorities concerned which would be decided in ac rdance with law. To this proposition of the State counsel, counsel f0 the petitioner showed his agreement. _ However, he prays for an inte im protection till the representation of the petitioner is decided by th authorities concerned. is disposed of with a direction that if Accordingly, the petitio the petitioner makes a repre entation to the authorities concerned within a period of ten days f om the date of receipt of copy of this order, the authd‘itiesrconce ed shall decide the same Within a further period of three weeks f rn the date ofiits receipt. Till then the order impugned shall be kept in abeyance so far as it relates to the petitioner. Sd/- f; ‘ Pritinker Diwaker ‘ i Judge - — \ B