' ^ i >/' i IN THE HIQH COHRT O? GHHATTiESSARH AT BIIASPUR APPb3E&NTS kItANTS .»-• ^y ,.5^" "^'^' v^ Clvil RevJ-sAon No. \^ *- /2003. -i) Anusuiya Bal, aged 28 years widow p£ Narayan Bhruv. .2) Soman s/o Narayan E&u"uv, aged 01 years. (.3/y Lalita Bai wldow ofi Vlshram Bhruv, aged 65 years On behaif o£ appllcanfc N®«2, Guardian (Nexts Fr.le(»a)Anusuiya , Bai wldow of Narayan ISuruv. All restdenti ofi village Gudurdlh, Post Labaka, Dlstt. Mahasamund (G.S.). - VERSUS - SBSPONDENTS ^NON-ApPLIG&iyrS ; (1) Iqtoai Mohaaamad s/o Yataib MolaaHuaad, address P.S7 A Bist.fc. Bargar-h (G.G.) (2) pradeep Ktimaff .Tain. residenfe ofi Saraipali. .<—.^—v (3) The ©rienfcalInsuranee Ge. (rlvate fciml.feed. "•u"UUB~<---^l-~ht.ni^uaW ©IVII, RBVISION UNBER SECTION IIS OF THE CODE OF OZVIL psoQSSsjas s • • , ( ', 11<^ ir .11- sl ^a 'Q XI-HC-22 3^ '<ll<llcl<<, siTfl^'KS, fijdiyy 3ii^iiaith iiiCTis»«<i<»»">-"'^">-T'-Y"-T^200 f^%' sn^rw fewsn^r 311^1 ^WIWflf?cT .CT/o Noneforthe applicants. This revision has been flled by ie applicants/olaimants against the |irder dated 22/01/2003 passed by the /th ADJ, Raipur in M.J.C. No. >9/2CX)2 by which the application fbr thdrawal of.Rs. 70,OQO/- from fbced teposit of Ansuya Bai on the ground that Rs. 30,0(X3/- Is required fbr 1-epairing the otd house, Rs. 40,QOO/- For the famity expenses and medical Itreatment, vras partly allowedand the ^laimants/applicants have been Ipermttted to withdraw Rs. 20,000/- only. After hearing counsel for the applicants, this Court is of the view that the impugned order passed by the Court betow is just and proper and no interterence is required with the same. Accordingty, the revision is dismtssed. Sd/- wita^rWRTT'^'te^ Tl^RZR A ^SlRlITW^T ('fl^^l^r)