x © } 6-0 ) ^CL^' c BEFOBE THB JBBiaftTtJRE OF HON'B&E eHHA't'TISGABH HI®HeXXJRT AT BIIASPOR w .P. : ^^_[ __ ___/2001 (WRIT UNBSKABTICLE 226/>27 OONSTITUTieH OP INDIA) WZcT (B.3T.) 56j&^—•, K'T°J"0"R PETITIONERS t ^'1. Shankar &al Sharma S/o Late Sbri ijhumak Lal Shaana aged aboufe S2 years, Eevenue Inspeetor, Maro Circle.Tahsil Nawagarh Bis-bsic-k '-&rg« (Ghhatfeisgarh). a.,^ .S.£. Mankar S/o Sbri Bamehandra '-/.>-'^j^!^'" Mankar aged about 48 years, Revenue InspeGtor Hazul Durg, .J%i&%^ ^•"^y-^""'' ->'C'I 1 1&-*~ Blst-b. Burg (Cbhattisgax-h) V ER SU S 1. State of Ghha-ti-fcisgarh •tshreugh GBiief Seaire-tary 8aipur 2. &ok Ayakta throygh Seeretary, Bhopal (M.P.) old SaGhiwaiaya, Bhopal (M.P.) 3. Superintienden-t police, Speaial Police Es-teablishment. Lols Ayuktta, Raipur (G.G.) '4. Shri Anil Pa-thak, Inspector of Poliee Special Police gstablishraenfe Lok Ayulc-tia, Raipur Inves-bing Offlcerj 5. S-hrl Toraan Singla Sonwani Thea Sut) Bivisional Offiieer (aeven- ue), .Pat.an MslsEi.e-tsBurg, preseirfeiy posted as (Revehue) Sovt. of etih- ',•»<&•* 8. 9. 10. Chhattisgarh afe Saipuar. Sompetee&t. Ay-fclioFi-ty, Urbaa Band Qetiing, Su.ffg-Bbi3.at. Burg. Shri G.L. Yadav, Then Naib Sahasildar, BMlai-3 Now a-fe Balod» District Bur-g (e.G.) Shri B.R. Lahari, TahasiidaF, Pa-fean Disfct. Burg. S 'hsi A.K. Shrivas-bava, then SahasildaiT, Pa-fean Now Pos-ted a-ts Simaga DisliEia-fe Raipur. Shri M.D. Tigala, •t.henHaib 'rahssil- dar Bhiiai-3 NQW posted a-b Bhatapara ..Bls'feF'iefe,Raipui^«3.8.)';'\ ' ' a H WBIT PETITION UNBER ARSE'XCSLE 226,227 eSniS'EITUTIQN 0F XNBXA K 3B-BG-22 ^^s^gR'H,; aUB'ai^iiu'ai^S^SQ^^ff'I^'Wi:"200 rasi ;-fil'iWt5S:li^W i'WWt»^9%^ k. ffl)^B^aSE'a ir 07/0i.i2062:- Shri Sanjay Kumar be^van, leomecl counsel for the petitioner. SHri Roijjy Shfivastay^, learned counsel; for -the 5-fate. Hedrd. A seport wxts lodgecl petitioners. i^K|trohslatec! co Tsy. been submitted Ay, reSpon3ei^t No.4 Shri Anil fPathak Ihspectdr bff Po|j<a, Spee^ Po\^^s^^dnm^, Ijc^^uk^, RaJpuraSlnyestigcH'ingOffiCef. The majn reSef sou^ht -ih •Hiis peti-tioiT is ^for^ <j[idshing "the ihvestigatiori dir'ee-t^cl cgainst the pe'titioner<,aiict .others. :.. • : ' • ': • - I have cdreful.ly peij' qllegations haye been mdde agdirjst the petitioners <md others under various provisions of law facts omd circumstances of sucl]i for this Court- m exerase. of ifs.extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Const with the investigation. In niy v seek ^remedy befbre any oppro^riate authority. Since this :a(;*i^^^l?i^ra)a'^^^^^fMt^R ^^•i^Rawsi^i ori 02/03/2001 dgainst the yfrorftl-liridjintoE|ig|ishhas used the report-. ; Various regarding corruption. In the a case it will not be proper itution of India tol interfere matter 1s now spehding b&fore L. ew it is for the petH'ioner -to »l«iyukta,;in-my.vievB2it,is»open t-^ ^. to th? petitioner to approBffih the sajd ctuthority for r^dreS^p •Mi^; ^d^