IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18056 of 2010 ANANDI PASWAN S/O LATE SADHU PASWAN @ LOTHU PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 26.08.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 27.8.2009 vide Cr.Misc. No. 23683 of 2009 since he had remained absconding about 17 years but had not given liberty to renew his prayer for bail, in case the trial is not completed within one year. A report was called for from the Trial Court from which it appears that no witness till date has been examined even though the case was committed to the court of sessions on 15.3.2010. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Additional 2 Session Judge, III, Barh (District-Patna) in connection with S.Tr. No. 178/09 (arising out of Bhadaur P.S. Case No. 38/92), subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the son/daughter in law of the petitioner. who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )