IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.434 of 2011 Vishal Singh & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 2 22.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Advocate General appearing for the State. The prayer of the petitioner is for quashing of the supervision notes as contained in Annexures- 2 & 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in this case chargesheet has been submitted in connection with Aurangabad P.S. Case No. 220 of 2009 registered on 30th May, 2009. Learned Advocate General appearing for the State submits that the petitioner could not have got access to the supervision note and the petitioner has unauthorisedly got access to these documents. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the trial of the petitioner was separated from other accused persons, and as such, he got the aforesaid documents from other co-accused. Be that as it may, I am not pursuing the matter further with regard to the access to the above documents. However, as admittedly, chargesheet has already been submitted in this case, I am not inclined to interfere into the matter. The writ application accordingly stands dismissed. Manish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)