!.!: i' iiin I i ^ -I. |Raju ^s HIQHCQUFtTOFCHHATFISGARH:BILASPUR Writ Petitlon (Sl NO. SaeGSSQOS Pstitioner Dr. Paritosh Kudesia, 47 years, S/o. Late BB Kudesia, Fingeshwara PHC, Rajim, Raipur. Versus -c/ Respondent State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary; Heatth & Family Wetfare Deptt., Mantralaya, Raipur. (Writ Petition under Art 226 of the Constitution of india) SB: Hon'bte lyir. SaUsh K. Agnihotri, J. Present i Shri Raja Sharma, counsel ftarthe petitioner.1 Shri U.N.S. Deo, Govt. Advocate fortheState. ORALORDER (Passed on 2Z January,2008) Leamed counsel appearing for the respondent/State subnaits that looking to the problem of the petitioner, theState will consider the representation of the petltloner on sympatheticgroundandlfthe.petfttonerhas alreadynot been relieved, he wlll not be relieved till the disposa) ofthe; representation, in the event thesame is made within three days, ifso advised. Learned counsel further submits tliat^frie representation would be considered as early'as possible, preferably within a period of two wgeks fronn thedateof receipt ofthe representation. 2) In view of olear oategorical statement made by leamed counsei appearing for the State, the petitioner is at llberty to make a detatled representation stating his difficulties fo the conoemed authorities: 3) ; \Accordlngly, the respondent/Secretary is directed to Consic!er:the representationofthepetltioneronsympathetieandmectioalgroundtopostthe petitioner at a place where the medieal'faciljtieSi to his son are ayailable. 4) Acooringly, the petitionisdisposeclpf. SatishK.Agnihotifl Judge Un.^.l-A-i^^^^^Mg VS^'&s.S^: