IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1008 of 2001 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO JADAV AJITSINH AMARSINH Versus GOVINDLAL CHIMANLAL -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR HM PARIKH for Petitioner MR VIREN G DAVE for Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 07/09/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Rule. Mr. Viren G. Dave waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondent. 2. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned order, which was passed on failure of the petitioner to remain present, is set aside. The Trial Court shall give an opportunity to the petitioner to file a reply in the Darkhast. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will remain present and file the necessary reply in the court on the date fixed by the Court. The petitioner shall file a reply to the application Exh.14 in Darkhast No.11 of 2000 in the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.), Kheda and thereafter, the court shall proceed to decide the application in accordance with law. Rule made absolute accordingly. Direct Service permitted. ####### hki