MST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO.299 OF 1998 Metrochem Ind. Ltd. Petitioner versus Atash Ind. (I) Ltd. Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.115 OF 1998 Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd. Petitioner versus Atash Ind. (I) Ltd. Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.428 OF 1998 Goyal MG Gases Ltd. Petitioner versus Atash Ind. (I) Ltd. Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.643 OF 1998 Splendour Investments Pvt.Ltd. Petitionet versus Atash Ind. (I) Ltd. Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.662 OF 1998 Shantilal Chottalal & Co. Petitioner versus Atash Ind. (I) Ltd. Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.689 OF 1998 B.K.Twisters Petitioner versus Atash Ind. (I) Ltd. Respondent WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.960 OF 1998 Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Petitioner versus Atash Ind. (I) Ltd. Respondent Ms.Irine Dilima i/by D’lima & Co. for Petitioner in CP 115/1998. Ms.D.Y.Adhav i/by Henal Vakharia & Co. for petitioner in CP 960/1998. Dipti Raja i/by Dhru & Co. for petitioner in CP no.643/1998. None present in CP Nos.299/1998, 428/1998, 662/1998, 689/1998. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATE : 22nd November 2007 PC : 1. Heard counsel for the petitioner. As the record indicates that the respondent company has already been ordered to be wound up by order dated 1st July 2004 passed in Company Petition No.91 of 1999, nothing survive for consideration in these petitions. The same are disposed of. The petitioners, if so advised, will be free to pursue appropriate remedy as may be permissible in law. All questions in that behalf are expressly kept open. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)