Ssl: •E BEI ® C'F [vo^-^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. fS) No. 3/2—/2007 PETITIONER >\^fw. ^^^' ^ ^•'~ ^ RESPONDENTS iS ^^f^f^ c^?8.to A.. G. 8^^^ ^-bakhan Lal Dansena S/o. Late Shri Kanhaiya Lal Dansena, Aged about 41 years, Post- Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Jobi, R/o. Village - Hamalpara, Tahsil Kharsia District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS ^. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer, ^ "^•^in-c ;s!...7S3&s;^ i!"?.?'?'*. ^.^/{^^ <'ox^ /fl-ly ^E 3. ^KI !:ii-f;' •^•x Raigrh, District Raigarh (C.G.) Block Education Officer Block-Kharsia District-Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 2^6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER5UITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS f XI-HC-78 3ST •<ll<l|ili), aiflti'is, Ridi+iy . ^.e.w^^-3iQ- +1WPTT Sh+llch v^ 2007 Sll^S'1 4ach (ll?li4'sl'^iT) sn^rwR-ii* (PIT 311^1 shuich Jn< SRiTwgl^cTan^r 22.1.2007 Mr. Anil Mourya. Advoeate fo Mrs. Anju Ahiya, Oeputy respondernts/State. With the consent of leorned are hear-d finally and disposed of. Common order dictated in W.| passed separately. A copy of this or-der be plac^ petitions. «nit|lcl41-<*i|ticiT^'tec^)'<Rl+<il< ^;3Tf^lT3.n^T ^* the petitioners. Sovernment Advocate for the |counse! for the parties, the matters '. (s) No. 309 of 2007 in open Court. d on record in other connected writ Sd/- SatishK.Agrahom Judge P.T.O. l^ HI6H COURT OF CHHATnS&tRH AT BSLASfUtt SIN6LE BENCH : HOhfBLE MR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 309 OF 2007 Ptetitioner wrsus Respondents Durga Choron Choudhury Stute of Chhottisgarh ond olhew WRTT PFTTTION (S.) N0. 310 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Respondents 6okul Prased Nuyak Stute of Chhattisgarh ond o'th«rs WUT PETITMN fS.) N0. 311 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Ram Sopal Vernw Storte of Chhattisgarh and o'thers And WRTT PETCTION (S.) N0. 312 OF 2007 Petitioner Reaondents veraus Lokhcn Lal Donsenu Stoite of Chhattisgurfi ond o-lhers Present Mr. Anil Mourya, Advoaite for Ihe petitioners. AArs. Anyw Ahuja, Deputy fiovemment Advocate for the StaWrespondents. OR&ER (Paased on 22"' Ddy of Janucuy, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel oppearing for -the petitioners as well as leamed Sovemment Advocate appearhg for the State/re^pondents jointty submit that -fhe fncts md quesl-ion of Inw involved in the present botch of wrH' petHioru <»» squnrely cowred by -the deciswn of thte Court in the COSB of YadwMHrt l&imar WwH'wdHK^ vs. Munfe^pa/ C'wporafton. Dwy cmd taiothe^. 2. In subsequent cnses, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2SX3S (AjMt* Kumw Veniwvs. Th»Stats 6evf. af CMuiHtsgarh wx/ anfftfiw) ond o-ther connectcd matters, decided by •this Courl- on 15-12-2006, pursuont to Ihe memo derted 28-1-1995, issued by -the Secretory, Boord of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploina in Eckication Exammution, it was clarified thut •the nomuictalure uf Ihe Bosic Trohiin9 Instilute, !<., B.TJ. has been chcnged and renamed as Diploma in Education, JA, D.Ed. Accordingly, Ihe D.Ed. Cert-ificote holders are also covered by thc ckscisxm in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Ayea* Kwm Verma vs. Jfw State Govt. of Chhattisegarh cnd esioltwi) (Supra). 3. For -the aforementioned reosons, 1+ie writ petitions are disposed of in -terms of the decision of this Courf in the niatter of yashwa'it Kumar BharadwaJ (Supm), subject to verificution of the fact ws to whe'ther the petitioners haw acquired B.Ed./D.Ed. Cert-rficates at their ow expenscs as per the drculars chted 24-12-1998 and l-3-1999 and further whe-ther they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order os to costs. 4. A copy of 1+iis order be ptaced on the record of -the connected twit peti1 Sd/- Satish K.y Judge 1 20060DMPJR-C696 Bablu