IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.54922 of 2007 1. BIBHISAN CHOUDHARY S/O LATE MISHRILAL CHOUDHARY 2. SURENDRA KUMR CHOUDHARY S/O BIBHISAN CHOUDHARY 3. BIMAL KUMAR CHOUDHARY S/O BIBHISAN CHOUDHARY 4. JAY NARAYAN CHOUDHARY SON OF LATE PRAYAG CHOUDHARY -- PETITIONERS Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAM NARAIN CHOUDHARY S/O LATE MANORATH CHOUDHARY -- OPP.PARTIES. ----------- 04 06.09.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners is not able to state about the present stage of the case. This application was filed challenging the order dated 09.04.2007 whereby cognizance under diverse Sections of the Penal Code was taken. The order impugned records that on a perusal of the case diary and charge sheet a prima facie case is made out. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that prior to lodging of the present case the mother of the petitioner no.2 had lodged a case for kidnapping/abduction of her son for the purpose of forceful marriage. It is the contention of the petitioners that the said case was investigated and found true leading to the filing of the charge sheet whereafter cognizance has been taken. Considering the scope of the jurisdiction invoked by learned trial Court I am not inclined to interfere with the order impugned. Petitioners shall have adequate opportunity to raise all the issues at the appropriate stage of the proceeding With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)