IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17469 of 2009 1. RAJ NARAYAN SINGH S/O LATE MANGAL SINGH LALIT NIKETAN COLONY, HANUMAN NAGAR, P.S- PATRAKAR NAGAR, TOWN AND DISTT- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, COOPERATIVE DEPRTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE REGISTRAR null CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR STATE CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD., ASHOK RAJ PATH, PATNA-4 4. THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND OFFICE, R.BLOCK, ROAD NO. 6, PATNA-1 WITH CWJC No.17471 of 2009 1. SIDDHESHWAR PRASAD SINHA S/O LATE DWARIKA PRASAD SINHA, R/O DESHRATHA PATH, VIJAY NAGAR, P.S- PATRAKAR NAGAR, DISTT AND TOWN- PANTA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR null THROUGH THE SECRETARY, CO-OPERTIVE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNEMNT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR STATE CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD., ASHOK RAJ PATH, PATNA-4 4. THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND OFFICE, R. BLOCK, ROAD NO. 6, PATNA-1 WITH CWJC No.17472 of 2009 1. BALIRAM PRASAD SINGH S/O LATE DHIRESHWAR PRASAD SINGH HOUSE NO. C/15,-C, PEOPLES CO-OPERATIVE COLONY KANKARBAGH, P.S- KANKARBAGH, DISTT AND TOWN, PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, CO- OPERATIVE DEPRTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR STATE CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD,, ASHOK RAJ PATH, PATNA-4 4. THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND OFFICE, R. BLOCK, ROAD NO. 6, PATNA-1 ----------- 03. 04.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and Mr. R.S. Pradhan appearing on behalf of respondent – 2 Regional Provident fund Commissioner. At the outset, Mr. Pradhan submits that the matter in issue in all the above three cases came up for consideration before this court in a batch of writ petition vide C.W.J.C. No. 17960 of 2009 and analogous cases, which was disposed of by order dated 29th of January 2010, whereby this court permitted the petitioners to represent before the respondent no. 4, and as such, in view of the above petitioners may also file their separate representations along with certified copy of the order dated 29th of January, 2010 passed in the aforesaid writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for expeditious disposal of their claims petitioners propose to file separate representations before the respondent No. 4. In case such representations are filed within a period of one week, the same shall also be considered in the light of the order dated 29th of January 2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 17960 of 2009 within a period of two months on receipt of such representation. All the above writ applications stand disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)