IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8134 of 2010 RAM PRAVESH SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 13.4.2010 Heard Dr. Lilawati Kumari learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Goh P.S. Case No. 42 of 2007 dated 11.4.2007 registered under sections 304 (B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the entire prosecution case is based on suspicion and in the first information report as many as 9 persons have been arrayed in the category of accused., though petitioner happens to be father-in- law of the deceased but he is not even named in the FIR as accused and not even suspicion has been raised against him. However, subsequently during the course of investigation on the basis of statement of some witnesses petitioner has been arrayed in the category of accused though even according to his statement there is no direct material to show the complicity of the petitioner in the crime in question. In the aforesaid back ground and particularly in view of the fact that petitioner being father-in-law has not been named - 2 - in the FIR as accused though several persons are named there in the FIR., in the e vent of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today the above named petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Aurangabad in the above noted case, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) M.Rahman