:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4562 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4562 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4562 OF 2004 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1321 OF 2004. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1321 OF 2004. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1321 OF 2004. -------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders -------------------------------------------------------- Mr. A.P. Mundargi with Mr. S.S. Salunkhe for the applicant. Shri B.R. Patil, P.P. for the State. CORAM : V.G. PALSHIKAR & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 03.11.2004 P.C. . Heard Counsel for the applicant and for the State. 2. The other accused persons in this appeal have been granted bail and it is therefore, submitted that the conviction being under Section 302 r/w 149 of I.P.C., there is no reason why :2: the bail should be denied to the accused No.1, present applicant. 3. It will be seen from prima facie perusal of the evidence that the death caused due to the injury inflicted by the accused No.1. This is in our opinion, is distinguishing feature for which bail should be refused. Hence, application for bail rejected. [ V.G. PALSHIKAR, J.] (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]