IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU C.R.P.No.5018 of 2010 Date: 7th December, 2010 Between: “Sevasadan Trust”, rep. by its Managing Trustee M.Syam Sundar. .. Petitioner And Gosula Sudha Madhuri and others. .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU C.R.P.No.5018 of 2010 ORAL ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed complaining that I.A.No.1610 of 2007 in O.S.No.31 of 2005 on the file of the learned IV Additional District Judge, Kadapa is not being disposed of in spite of several adjournments and now it is three years since the I.A. is pending. In this regard, a report was called for from the I Additional District Judge-cum-FAC of Special Sessions Judge for SCs and STs (POA) Act-cum-IV Additional District Judge, Kadapa, who submitted his report on 20.11.2010, which reads as under: “With reference to the phone message received from the Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad it is to inform that the suit in O.S.No.31 of 2005 was filed under Order 7 Rule 1 r/w Order 33 Rule 1 of CPC to permit the plaintiff (Trust) to file the suit informa-pauperies to declare the plaint schedule properties as Trust “SEVASADHAN” properties and delivery possession directing the defendants to deposit the monthly rents into the Court. The suit stand posted to 18.11.2010. It is further to inform that I.A.No.1610/07 was filed under Order 40 Rule 1 of C.P.C. for appointment of an Advocate-Receiver to collect the rents and its accounts for after using the rents to effect thorough repairs to the lodging house and its management. The petition is being posted for enquiry along with the suit and stands posted to 18.11.2010. From 18.11.2010 the matter was posted to 23.12.2010 because the Advocates are abstaining from attaining the courts and there was no representation regarding urgency in the matter. It is further informed that I.A.No.1610/07 is pending since long time because the regular Presiding Officer was resigned and the I Additional District Judge, Kadapa who was incharge of the IV Additional District Judge, Kadapa was also transferred. The Judge, Family Court, Kadapa who was incharge of IV Additional District Judge, Kadapa was retired and ultimately District Judge, Kadapa is incharge for sometime and also the parties did not represent urgency in the matter”. 2 The learned counsel for petitioner states that the matter is posted to 23.12.2010. Under those circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits, the learned I Additional District Judge, Kadapa is directed to dispose of I.A.No.1610 of 2007 in O.S.No.31 of 2005 on 23.12.2010 to which date, it stands adjourned, or on or before 31.12.2010 positively. The C.R.P. is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 7.12.2010 Note: Registry to dispatch the order by tomorrow. B/o DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU C.R.P.No.5018 of 2010 7.12.2010