^ COIIS.T OF.CHHATTISGARII AT BIIASP15E. li^ m PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Saha WiitPetitioii.CSLNo,.427of2^g Mohd. Iqbal S/o Late SM Shiekh Hasaii, aged about 42 year^ Occupation-Service, Posted as Peon (Daftari) State Baiik ofSaurashtra Raipur Braiich r/o Pandari Talab New Ganj Mandi Road, Raipur, Tahsil & Distt. Raipur (CG). ^7ERSUS 1. State Baiik of Saurashtra TIii'oiigli General Manager, State Bank of Saurashtra, Head Office Bhavnagar 2. Assistent Manager, Stafe Bank of Saurashtra^ Regioiial Office, R-ea.ga.ii No. A-4 Second Floor, Jeevan Deep building-8, Saasad Marg, New Delhi-1 10001. 3. Braiich Manager State Baitk of Saumshtra, Raipur Branch Ags'asen Chowk, Ramsagar Para^ Raipur^ Distt. Raipur (CG). (WRir PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTimON OF IbTOIA) fSB;. Hois'MeMr. K. AffniSiotei. J.) Present : Slm Suml Sahu, Advocate for the petitione!\ None for the respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 22nd ofJaiiuai-y, 2008) 1» Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that beiiig aggrieved Iw the order dated 07.02.2007 (Ajmexiire P/l) passed by the appomting authority, State Baitik of Saurashtra, the petitiosier has preferred an appeal date-d 28.02.2007 (Aimexiire P/8) before the Assistaiit General Ma.nager, State Baiik of Saurashtra, New Delhi. The appeal is peiidiiig coiisideration befbre the aufhorities. 2« In view of the pendeiicy of statutoty appeal, the present writ is not mamfainable. There camiot be two parallel proceedings agaiiist the same grievance arising from the same cause ofactioii. 3. The petitioii is accordingly dismissed, However, the petitioner is at iiberty to pursue his appeal. No order asto coste. ^^-^—-— — Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge