SINGLE BENGHI<^)1 \0 ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. (S) N0. ^/)^3 /2009 PETITIONER ...^.^ •-::;^-^'^^"' ^^" ^-••"" RESPONDENTS Praveer Kant Timothi S/o K.P. Timothi, aged about 39 years, R/o village Semara, Post Sanatorium, Gaurella, District Bilaspur C.G. VERSUS x 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Education Department, D.K. S. Bhawan Raipur C.G. 2. The District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G. 3. The Principal, Mishri Devi Higher Secondary School, Pendra Road, District Bilaspur C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. ?^'0 PETITiONER HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4039 of 2009 Praveer Kant Timothi (^ RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhatiisgarh & Others ^Vrit Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India) Slngie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Sudhir Verma, c-ounsei for the petJtioner. Shrl N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. OjTOERJORAL) • (Passed on this 19th day of'February, 2010) With the consent of learned counse! for the parties, the petitjon is heard finally. :. This case perta'ins to grievance of non-grant of retirai dues. Learned counsel appearing for the petltloner, on Instructbns, submits that the matter may be referred to the Pension Committee. i. This Court, in W.P.No.4642/2004 .(Baijnath iVlandal Vs. The Stete of Chhattjsgarh & others) arid other con.nected matters, dlrected the Committee to consider the matter of retrlal dues-as the disputed question of facts.were involved. The Com'mittee was constituted by the State Govemment pursuant to the order dated 19-06-2006 in W.P.No.1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), and order .dated :13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of. Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baljnath I^andai and another). Thus, this petition is squareiy covered by the judgment and order dated 31st January, 2008 passed in W.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandat (supra) as submittsd by learned counsel appearing for the parties. ® Gowri 4. ' This petition Is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i,e., the office of the Advocate; General is directed to send the case to the Commlttee. within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Com-mittee shail'Jssye notice to the petltioner and officers concerned withjn a'furi:her:perjodof15 days. The Commjttee shali consider and pass order, in aec&rdance with Saw, after affordtng proper opportunity of hearing to 'the petltioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file addltlonal; documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, IncSudlng paynient of retiral dues, If any, to the petltioner, be compteted within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copyofthis order, 5. The petitloner shall suppiy one compJete set of the petition to the State counse! for transferring the same to the Comniittee. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge