1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 6018 of 2011. Date of decision: 31.8.2011 Vidyasagar Sharma .. Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others ..Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: “(i) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued directing the respondent more specifically respondent No. 3 to consider the candidature of the petitioner for admission to B.Ed. Training Course for the session 2011-11 against C&V category against a vacant seat.” 2. On 29th July, 2011, this Court passed the following order in CMP No. 7558 of 2011: 2 “Learned Deputy Advocate General seeks time to get instructions. It is made clear that in case there is available vacancy under the quota under C&V, the same shall be allotted to the petitioner.” 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the interim order, no further order is required to be passed. Therefore, the said interim order is made absolute and the writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the said order, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice Rajiv Sharma), August 31, 2011. Judge (sck/hl)