3 :w INTHEHIGNCOyRTQfrJUblCATUREA"rBaEl^SP>UII ''^^^^^^^^^^^^ W.P^ NO.SJg^ 2_/200S PtTtTtONER RESPON&ENTS : ^^ ^^y Khelan^RamSat%i,396dabOut 54 years, S/o^ Shri j ©atieshRam Sahy, R/0. Kajlash Nalgar.Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh VERSUS ^ ^^y^ ^^^: €^W ^- State of Chhattisgarlr, TtTFOugh: TheiSecretary/ Government ofChhaftisgarh Departmeht of Revenue, D.K.S. Bh^W9h, M^ntralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh TheCollector District 3ah]9ir Champa> GhhattisgQrh 1 r TheSubpivistonalOffrcer (Revenue| Pawigarh|Distnct Jari39JrCh^rr»Fia,C3hhlattrtg3rh ^, WRlT^ETI"rEOI<':^lllDEI^^Rl'B^I-E^26^2S7!-<lll>:T"M'&' ^FIIIE ^ll I • .l/Jl ii-T-!!i--{-| ^^•^ ^ft HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH : BILASRJR PETITIONER WRIT PETITiON N0.3302 OF2005 Khetan RamSahu RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of tndia) Sjngle Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. ^nihotri, J. Present:- Shri«R.S.Marhas,AdvocaNforthepetitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Government Advocate for the State. 2. 3. 4. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 25th day of March.2011) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that since ttie main prayer of this petition for considering the application of the petstioner for voluntary retirement, has aiready been granted by the respondent authorities, the petitloner may be permltted to withdraw this petition with Isbertyto chalfonge other prayers, Sfso advised. No objection fr&m other side. It is ordered, as prayed for. Accordingiy, the writ petition is dismissed as withdmwn with the above-stated libertv. 1 1 Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge Arun