IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No. 44 of 2008 Date of decision : February 25, 2010 Ved Pal ....Appellant versus Rohtash Kumar ....Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. Kulvir Narwal, Advocate, for the appellant Mr. SP Chahar, Advocate, for the respondent Parties also in person. L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) With the intervention of the Court, the parties have effected compromise. Their joint statement has been recorded separately which is reproduced herein:- “Stated that we have effected compromise. Plaintiff respondent shall pay Rs 1 lac to defendant-appellant within one month from today by depositing in the trial court and thereupon the instant appeal shall stand dismissed and the plaintiff- respondent shall be absolute owner in possession of the suit property. However, in the event of failure of the respondent to pay the aforesaid amount within stipulated period, the appeal shall stand allowed and defendant-appellant shall be absolute owner in possession of the suit property and the suit filed by the plaintiff shall stand dismissed. The appeal be disposed of accordingly.” Regular Second Appeal No. 44 of 2008 -2- The appeal has thus been lawfully compromised. In view of compromise, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the above statement. ( L.N. Mittal ) February 25, 2010 Judge 'tiwana'