1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1597 OF 2009 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER STAMP NO.2610 OF 2009 Ansiram s/o Bapurao Raut ... APPLICANT APPELLANT (Original Defendant) VERSUS Raosaheb s/o Khanderao Mahajan, deceased through L.Rs. Gangadhar s/o Raosaheb Mahajan & ors. RESPONDENTS (Original Plaintiffs) ..... Shri N.J. Pahune Patil, Advocate for the applicant Shri A.S. Osmanpurkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 & 5 Shri S.P. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for respondent Nos.1,2,4 & 6 ..... CORAM : Shrihari P. Davare, J. DATED : 3rd July, 2009. ORAL ORDER: 1. Perused. The applicant/ appellant (original defendant) has preferred the present Civil Application for condonation of delay of 22 2 days in filing the accompanying Appeal from Order. 2. In view of the reasons mentioned in paragraph No.3 of the present Civil Application, it is apparent that the delay caused in filing the accompanying Appeal from Order is not willful/ intentional and deliberate as well as the said delay is not inordinate and, therefore, same is required to be condoned in the interest of justice, giving opportunity to the applicant/ appellant to prosecute the accompanying Appeal from Order on merits. 3. In the result, present Civil Application No.1597/2009 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) thereof and delay of 22 days caused in filing the accompanying Appeal from Order stands condoned and the accompanying Appeal from Order be registered and numbered accordingly and same be fixed for admission on 22.7.2009 (Shrihari P. Davare, J.) fmp/ca1597.09