E F-»"(•'»>(. ^.......... liUXM IN THE COURT OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTJSGARhLAT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION N0 .^765^006 PETITIONER Samelal S/o Late Shri Jagbandhu, Aged abouts^'year working as Gangman Departmentof P.W.D.R/o Gurdihari, Tah. Sarangarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) ^> RESPONDENTS N^l^l2^/6L ^^^G. ^"S VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 3. Superintending Engineer, PublicWorks Department, BilaspurDivision, Distt.Bilaspur(C.G.) 4. Executive Engineer, PublicWorks Department, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) WRLT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AWRITIN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS.PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. ORANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER M-HC-22 3TI^I'^T R-IJ+ sn^i i^Rlcs tt^Ti 'v...- ^/ 7»?-^WM<-I. 's:s^w, ^wvy 3ff^?C T?^? „ , ^ /, \^"^' ^'D" 7^^7°^ Tw^vvKtn^ """"""""'""" "'""v^ 2no l^^sr' an^'FsireTtrtta :8-3-2006 Shri Sameer Behar, counsei forl Shri Satjsh Gupta, Dy. Govt. Acjvocate Ap.piication for urgent hearing i^ Heard. The petitione.r has filed thi^ Constitution of India on the ground th^t •his services have notbeeh regularize4 Counsel for the petitioner subrr 4>l'il[?f4!-i ^Wi-il' 4 feat ipattfK ^T afiw 3II^?I the petitioner. for the Siate. allowed. petition under Articles 226/227 of the even after completing 25 years ofservics, its that the pQtitioner is serving as Gangman since more than 25 years. l-1e has fil^d copy.of Sen/ice Book. He submits thatthe petitioner is entitled to be reguiarize^ under the Gangmen's ServiceRules, 1996 Annexure P-2 and Circulars Annexijre P-3 dated 9-4-2003 and Annexure P-4 dated 3-9-2002. it is pointed out tha{ representations as per Annexure P-6 were made CQllectively and the same is pen^ling. It is also pointed out that some persons have been regularized. j Learneql State counsel pointed petitioner is pend.ing and thesame wii (jiutthatthe representationsubmitted bythe Ibe considered and decided. . the Having considered and withoutj case, in the opinion of this Court, for direction is given to the petitioner to his grievances before the respondent| of the petition and this order, withj representation bein.g fiied, the compet^nt the same on its own merits in accordince within three months from the date of made clear that if any grievance available under the law. With the aforesaid observations] Certified copy as per rules. expressing any opinion on the merits of ths present, ends of justice wjll be served if a rjiake a detaited representation afresh raising |no. 2 - Engineer-in-Chief along with a copy |n three weeks from today, and on such. authority of the respondents shafl decide with law as early as possible .preferably ijeceipf production of the representation. 1{ is rfiains, the petitioner may avail the remedy. rertiains, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [-cn^ ^fisi^