... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.887 OF 2001 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Mr M.J. Shetty for the Appellants. Ms Sapna Samant i/by Mr H.S.S.Moorthy for the Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4. Mr J.J. Xavier for the Respondent No.3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : APRIL 12, 2006. : APRIL 12, 2006. : APRIL 12, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Not on board. Taken on board on the request made by the Advocate appearing for the Appellants. The Advocate appearing for the Appellants prays that he may be granted permission to delete the name of the Respondent No.3. Permission is granted to delete the name of the Respondent No.3 at the risk of the Appellants. Amendment to be carried out within four weeks. 2. The Advocates appearing for the Appellants and the Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 have tendered consent terms. The consent terms are marked ‘X’ and taken on record. ... 2 ... The Advocates appearing for the Appellants and the Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 state that their respective clients have duly signed the consent terms and their respective clients admit the correctness of the contents of the consent terms. The statements made by the Advocates appearing for the parties are accepted. The Advocates pray that decree be passed in Appeal in terms of the consent terms. 3. In view of what is stated above, the First Appeal is disposed of in terms of consent terms which are taken on record. Decree be drawn accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE