FA/832/1984 1/3 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD FIRST APPEAL No. 832 of 1984 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI =================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? =================================== JASVANTSINH AJITSINH GADHVI - Appellant(s) Versus SURSING SOMABHAI PARMAR & 2 - Defendant(s) =================================== Appearance : MR MTM HAKIM for Appellant(s) : 1, NOTICE SERVED for Defendant(s) : 1 - 2. MR SV RAJU for Defendant(s) : 3, =================================== CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI Date : 13/05/2008 FA/832/1984 2/3 JUDGMENT ORAL JUDGMENT 1. This appeal at the instance of the original claimant is directed against the judgement and award dated 4th April 1983 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kheda (Aux.) at Nadiad in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.256 of 1980 in so far as the same is against the appellant. 2. The original claimant was traveling in a truck going towards Tarapur and when it reached beyond Limbasi near four cross roads, the truck left the road and dashed with a papal tree. The applicant and others sustained injuries and therefore the applicant has filed the aforesaid claim petition. The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.1000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum. 3. As a result of hearing and perusal of the record it is found that the Tribunal has discussed the issue in paragraphs 16 and 17 of the Tribunal and looking to the injury received by the applicant the Tribunal has awarded Rs.1000/-. Nothing is pointed out to take a contrary view of the matter. I am in complete agreement with the reasonings adopted and findings arrived at by the Tribunal. FA/832/1984 3/3 JUDGMENT 4. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. [K.S. JHAVERI, J.] ar