IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 13828 of 2008. Decided on: 24.2.2011. Onkar Singh & others ……….Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. & others. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners. : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. R.D. Kaundal, learned vice Counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to subsequent developments. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. February 24, 2011 (hl) (Rajiv Sharma) Judge 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.