IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.755 of 2009 Date of decision:- 18.11.2009. Narain Singh ...Petitioner Versus T.C. Gupta, Chief Administrator, HUDA ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present:- Mr. Jagjit Beniwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nikesh Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. Siddharth Batra, Advocate for the respondent. RAKESH KUMAR GARG J. It is not in dispute that in compliance of the order dated 29.11.2006, passed by this Court in CWP No.16995 of 2006, the respondent has passed a speaking order dated 20.07.2009 rejecting the claim of the petitioner for entitlement of allotment of plot under the Oustees Scheme. In view of the aforesaid fact alone, I am not inclined to proceed further with this contempt petition. Rule discharged. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid order (Annexure R-1) in accordance with law. November 18, 2009 ( Rakesh Kumar Garg ) vj Judge