IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1403 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.31729/2009 Dated 25/06/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- LEELAVATHI AMMA, D/O.LATE KODIYIL KESAVAN NAIR, KODIYIL HOUSE, VAZHUKAPPARA, KINAVALLUR, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. P.S.MANI, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICE, OLAVAKKODE, PALAKKAD. 2. C.VIJAYAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE TAHSILDAR, PALAKKAD. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.M. POULOSE THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- Cont. Case NO. 1403 OF 2009 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th November, 2010 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Even though the Tahsildar, who was directed to demarcate the boundary of the property has failed to do so, petitioner has produced a sketch prepared and signed by the Village Officer. Government Pleader has not received any instruction from the Village Officer in the matter. I do not think there is any need to keep the contempt case pending. Accordingly contempt case is disposed of with direction to the Village Officer to issue possession certificate to the petitioner and accept tax for the area, he found to be in petitioner's possession, based on Forest Tribunal's order. (C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge kk 2