IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12074 of 2011 CHANDAN SUTIHAR (SHARMA) Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 28.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state assisted by learned counsel for the complainant. Petitioner is husband of the complainant and he is languishing in jail custody since 20.12.2010 in connection with Complaint Case No. 177(C) of 2010 for the offences punishable under sections-498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and section-3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the complainant submits that the complainant is ready to lead her conjugal life with the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is also ready to lead her conjugal life with the complainant. Without touching the merit of the case, the petitioner, namely, Chandu Sutihar (Sharma) is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 177(C) of 2010. It is made clear that after release of the petitioner from judicial custody, the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Birpur shall issue notices to the complainant as 2 well as to the petitioner fixing a date for reconciliation and shall take all possible steps to resolve the dispute of the parties. Furthermore, it is also made clear that if the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Birpur fails in his attempt of reconciliation on account of non-cooperation of the petitioner, he shall be at liberty to pass order for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)