Petitioner Resgondenis i§U Writ Petition {S} No. 3448 of 2$08 Dhanurjay Kumar Chauhan, Sic. Sim Dhobaram Chauhan, aged about 55 years, Upper Division Tsacher, Gavemment Midwe Sci—mt, 3haimala, Biock Pusaur, District Raigarh (CG). Versu$ 1) State of Chhattisgarh thrcugh Secretary, Schooi Education Depadmsnt, Dk’S Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2) The Secfetary, Genera! Administration Department, DKS. Bhawan, Rapur (CG) District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG). 4} Blosk Education Officer, Pusaur, Disirict Raigarh (CG). (Writ Peiition under Article 226/227 of the Consiituticn of india) sB: Hon’bie Mr. satish K. Agnihotri, a. W?s§ht: Shri BL. Dgmbra, caunseifcrthe petitioner. Shri MRS. Bhatia, Govt. Advocate forthe State. OWL OR§ER (Pageed cu 4‘“ day af July, 2008} With cowsent of both the parties, the maiter is heard iinaiiy. 'i) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to second Kramonnati as per circuiar dated 24—4-2DE)6 read with 17-3-19g9/19-4-1 999 (Annexure Pl2) after compietion of 24 years of service. Learned counsel further submits that the issue invoived in the present petition has aiready been considered and decided by this Court in the matter oi KS. Verma Vs. State of ahhattisgarh and others (VV.P.N0.2805/2002) by judgment and order dated 2Q-8—2006. Learned counsel turther submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation to consider, the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon’bie Supreme Court in the matter of State of Tripura and others Vs. K.K. Roy £2034 SCWit) and the order passed in Rs. Verma (supra), to which learned counsei appearing for the respondents/State has no objection. 2) Accordingly, liberty sought for by the petitioner is granted to make a representation before the concerned authorities. 3} in View of the above, the petition is disposed of with the aroresaic’ WOM- / A , m, _ _: