THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5367 OF 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 30.10.2010, in I.A.No.725 of 2010 in O.S.No.17 of 1999 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Huzurabad, wherein the said application filed by the respondents herein-defendants under Order VIII Rule 1-A (3) CPC, seeking permission to file some documents, was allowed. 2. Heard both sides. Perused the records. 3. Petitioners herein filed the suit against the respondents herein for permanent injunction. Defendants filed written statement contesting the suit. During the course of trial, petitioners filed copy of the plaint in another suit-O.S.No.15 of 1999 and the same was marked as Ex.A6. After closure of the plaintiffs’ evidence, defendants, during the course of their evidence, sought to file written statement, filed in the said suit-O.S.No.15 of 1999, and also the depositions of P.Ws.1 and 2 in O.S.No.15 of 1999. The same was objected to by the petitioners on the ground of delay. Petitioners-plaintiffs also filed the documents, including Ex.A6, only during the course of their evidence in March, 2010. When the defendants’ turn came for adducing their evidence, in October, 2010, the present documents are sought to be filed. 4. Be that as it may, as the documents sought to be filed are part of the judicial proceedings in O.S.No.15 of 1999 and the plaint copy in the said suit has also been filed and marked as Ex.A6, no prejudice would be caused by permitting the defendants to file the documents, namely the written statement in O.S.No.15 of 1999 and depositions of P.Ws.1 and 2. The said documents are, however directed to be received, subject to proof and relevancy. It is open to the petitioners-plaintiffs to seek permission of the trial Court to recall their witnesses for the purpose of adducing additional evidence, if any, pertaining to the documents now sought to be filed by the defendants. The impugned order is therefore held not liable to be interfered with. 5. In the result, Civil Revision Petition is disposed of as stated above. _______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 18th August, 2011. Tsy