IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 4TH AUGUST 2009 / 13TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 22692 of 2008(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- J.RAMESH, S/O JANAKAN, TC 28/2309 (1), SREEKANTESWARAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CITY CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, FINANCE COMMITTEE, CITY CORPORTION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE REVENUE OFFICER, CITY CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R1-3 SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR FOR R1-3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX(WPC 22692/2008) PETITIONER'S EXTS. EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 19.4.2006. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 4.1.2006. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 2.2.2006, 13.2.2006, 15.2.2006, 17.2.2006, AND 18.2.2006 ISSUED BY R1. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 20.3.2006. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 14.7.2006. EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE RESOLUTION NO.R6/31763/2006 DTD. 22.10.2007. EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED ON 9.6.2008. lgk THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO. 22692 OF 2008 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner paid certain amounts as property tax. Later, on revision, the total payables were reduced. The petitioner says that he was entitled to refund. The learned senior counsel appearing for the Corporation states that on 29.7.2008, an intimation dated 28.7.2008 was despatched by the Corporation requiring the petitioner to collect a cheque for Rs.1,04,644/-. It appears that the situation in hand, as of now is only a communication copy. Learned counsel representing the learned senior counsel for the Corporation has shown me a copy of the said communication. Let a copy of that be given to the learned counsel for the petitioner so that the petitioner will work out his remedies appropriately. Hence it is ordered that without prejudice to the contentions, however, directing that the amounts as found due would be released. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE lgk/4/8