§§$§fs§ S w“ ft IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS W.P. No. 587$ [2005 « Arun Kumar Chandahe, aged about 44 years, S/o. Late Shri RP. Chandahe, Presently working as Sub Engineer, Municipal Council Bhilai Charauda, District Durg, Chhattisgarh, R/o. F—2, Staff Quarter, Vasundhara Nagar, South Bhilai —3, District Durg, Chattisgarh ‘ VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh Department of Urban Administration & Development D.K‘S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh The Director, Directorate of Urban Administration 8r, Development, Raipur, Chhattisgarh The Municipal Council Bhilai Charauda, Through: Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council Bhilai Charauda, District Durg, Chhattisgarh /I’ . WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLEP226I 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA , XLHC-ZZ Shri Rambir S ingh Mamas} couns w Qhm n} uuLLm. Qahnh ("u ouyla, un4 Pu uy. r" o Heard. \ Learned counsei' for the petitione z transferred from Nagar Panohaya'r, Garr vide order dated 4—8—zuua (Annexure-F months vide order dated 28-iO—20l35 (i transferred from Nagar Pairka Harrenac Baiod Le. during t‘ne ban pertoo. wt, Adv: ei for the petitionert He petitioner the education of 'nle o‘ntidren v appearing for t‘ne petitioner submits that a direction is given to the respondent a peIIEIOi'tef. The prayer is not opposed by t'ne Having considered and ,Witnom etaiied representation raismg his grievances before the competent authority of reepon 'ents atongvvith a copy of the petition and this order within a period of t5 days from to Q+n+n ~na+n €nr +h ULQLG. Jymtc IUI _ Ln r submits that eariier the petitioner has been jai to Nagar Paiika Parishact Bhiiai-Charoda 1‘2). i—ie furthers submits that just within two xnnexure—P/‘t) the petitioner has again been i, Bhiiai-Czharoda to Nagar Paiika Parishao', aiso submits that on being transferred the routd be adverseiy affected Learned counsel ’or the present ends ofjustice wiii be served if uthorities to decide the representation or the xpressing any'opin’ion on the merits or the case the petitioner is directed to make a and on such representation being fiied, the competent authority of the respondents shaii decide thesame on its own merits in accordance with iaw as eariy as possm preferabiy within a period of two months rrom the date of receipt of repreSerrtation. it is made Ciear that if any grievance stiii remains' the petitioner may avaii the remedy avaii Learned counsei for the petition been reiieved. He prays for grant of inte in view of the above, it isdireete aiiowed to continue tiii the representatio With the aforesaid observations, Consequentiy, iv'i.(\/V.‘}P,i\io.4669 2 Certified copy as per ruies, State counset bie undertne iaw. r submits that tiii\dat.e the petitioner has not im reiief. that if thepetitioner is not reiieved he may be is demoed. t ‘nis petition stands disposed ot UUo aiso standso'isposed or. Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge d y i d