IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44095 of 2010 SURENDRA YADAV, SON OF LATE LALU YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the marriage of the petitioner with the deceased had taken place more than eight years ago and even though there is an allegation that the deceased was strangulated and poisoned to death but no external injury appear even on her person by the Doctor who performed the post mortem examination report. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha (West Champaran) in Chautarwa (Bathwaria) P.S. Case No. 146 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court 2 concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)