IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO.1902 OF 2009 Sou Archana Rajendra Purohit & ors ..Petitioners. vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors ..Respondents. Mr A.M.Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioners. Smt M.P.Thakur, A.G.P., for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr P.J.Thorat, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. CORAM:- D.K.DESHMUKH AND K.K.TATED,JJ. DATE :- 14TH DECEMBER,2009 P.C:- The petitioner, by this petition, is seeking direction to the Management to pay salary for the last three years as per the M.E.P.S.Rules. However, in the petition it is not specified as to what is the difference between the salary being paid to the petitioner and the salary prescribed under the M.E.P.S.Rules. The petitioner also seeks a direction to the management to pay salary as per the Government Resolution. The copy of the Government Resolution issued in this regard is not placed on record. The material on record does not show that the Management is paying less salary to the petitioner, than the management is under legal obligation to do. In our opinion, the petitioner is making vague grievance without placing relevant material on record. Entertaining such a petition will amount to permitting the petitioner to misuse extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court. Petition is hereby rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J) (K.K.TATED,J)