IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2357 OF 2006 PETITION (L) NO. 2357 OF 2006 PETITION (L) NO. 2357 OF 2006 Ramlu Mantaya Racharala ... Petitioner V/s. Chief Executive Officer, ... Respondents SRA & ors. Ms. Anita Agarwal with Mr. S.S. Jinsiwala for the petitioner. Mr. G.D. Utangale i/b. M/s. Utangale & Co. for respondent No. 1. Mr. Pradeep Jadhav, AGP for respondent Nos. 2,3 & 6. Mr. P.B. Naiknaware for respondent No. 4. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 28th November, 2006 : 28th November, 2006 : 28th November, 2006 P.C. . Reply has been filed on behalf of MHADA. It is pointed out therein that the subject matter of the petition is a part of Mass Housing Projects being undertaken by the respondents. There are altogether 56 hutment dwellers, out of which 18 have been held to be eligible and balance 32 hutment dwellers have not submitted their documents. Those who are eligible, will be entitled to the some benefits as under SRA scheme. Therefore, we are not inclined to exercise our extra-ordinary jurisdiction. It will be, however, open to the 32 hutment dwellers, if their cases are not considered, to apply to the respondents for ( 2 ) determination of the eligibility. They should do so within a period of six weeks from today and the respondents, on receipt of said applications, to decide the same not later than 12 weeks thereafter. 2. With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]