IN THE HIGH COURT UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 424 (SS) OF 2006 Jagdish Babu Yadav, Lecturer Physics, Govt. Inter College, Danta, Uttarkashi. …………….Petitioner. Versus 1. Director of Education, Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 2. District Education Officer, Uttarkashi. 3. Principal, Govt. Inter College, Danta, Uttarkashi. 4. Principal, Govt. Inter College, Jakhol, Uttarkashi. ………….Respondents. Mr. S.S. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Dated: 28.03.2006 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 16.09.2005 (Annexure No.2 to the writ petition). Further prayer has been made for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to accommodate the petitioner in any Govt. Inter College (at District Udham Singh Nagar or Haridwar) outside the District Uttarkashi, on the post of Lecturer Physics. Petitioner has confined his prayer for disposal of his representation field on 24th February, 2006. Briefly stated, the petitioner was initially appointed as Assistant Teacher C.T. Grade in the year, 1985 in Government Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidyalaya Naitwar, Uttarkashi, 2 thereafter, he was promoted in L.T. Grade on 15.12.1988. On 21.02.2002, he was promoted as Lecturer Physics and allotted Rajkiya Inter College, Gyansu, Uttarkashi. The petitioner approached the Principal of the Gyansu Inter College but there was not a single post of Physicsl Lecturer so the petitioner returned back and approached several authorities and made application. The petitioner started his functioning at Government Inter College, Uttarkashi vide letter dated 13th September, 2002. However, on 16th September, 2005, the order has been passed attaching the petitioner in the Govt. Inter College, Jakhol, Uttarkashi. The petitioner approached the authorities concerned several times for withdrawing attachment, but till date no order has been passed. The petitioner has also referred the endorsement made on 8th October, 2005 on the representation of the petitioner to the following effect:- “bl izR;kosnu ds lkFk esjs i=kad 4672@f’k0e0@3@¼5½@f’k{kk@04&05 fnukad 19@7@05 dk voyksdu djsa vkSj of.kZr leL;kvksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, bUgs tuin gfj}kj vFkok m/keflag uj esa fdlh mPph Ñr fo|ky; eas LFkkukUrfjr djs rc rd bUgs ;Fkkor cuk, j[ksaA” After the attachment order has been passed, the petitioner has submitted that he is not getting salary. In view of the aforesaid facts, the respondent no. 1 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order keeping the fact that wherever the vacancy arises, the post shall be given to the petitioner in accordance with the representation filed by the petitioner. However, the attachment order shall remain in operation for a period of three weeks and in the meantime, respondent no. 1 shall pass a fresh order in the light 3 of the observations made above. Further the petitioner shall be accommodated at the suitable teaching place. If the petitioner is not getting salary, the same shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order. Writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) 28.03.2006 Rathour