T lM3 IN THB HIGH COURT OP JUDICATURE fS BILASPUR (C.G.) ViRIT PETTTION Ed. 22-3- OP 2001 :'^n-iT,,j!^';,T' i.a»'.L"^SfSt j^ Ranbha Bal W/o Vinod Chan(3ra $ aged 38 years, Sarpaneh of Gram Panahayafc Rajga,Tahsil Sakti^ Disfcricfc Janjglr^ ChaCTpa. ^fo^ ^•^ !v' ^•"-^ ^^'•-<'\' .^ *1.,&1 S^^c?t .// ,^y 2. 3. 4'. 5:. 6'. 9. 10 XND' ?ETITIOI'@R Smt. Dhariitunwar,,W/o Reshamlal aged 35 years,by cas-be Jaghariya , resident of Village Rajga, Tahsl.1 Sakti,' Districfe Janjgir Champa. Nohar Bai W/o Ssasant Sahu^,: Laxmin Bai W/o Premlal Sahu . Sl.no.. 2 and 3 resident or Viilage RaJga,Tahsil Sakti.,Dis-tric'fc Janjgir Charapa. PresAding Officer Booth No.34. presidi.ng Offieer Boo-bh No.35 Presiding Offl.cer Booth No.36 All •bhro't^h -fche Itetlirning ®ffi.cer,Panchava-b Ghynav_Vl.kas Khandr'I'ahsil Sak'lsi^Distrlct Janjgir GhgKDa'. Rstxirning Officer/Tahsildar SaKtt,; Tahsil Sail;ti, Distric-t Janjglt- Ghanipa. « Sub Dlvisional.Officer (R) Sakti,DistriGfc Janjgi-r Charapa. State of Chha1;tisgarh,' through fche Seare+.a.^ Parch5jya'fc,:: MantralES?,' D.K.Building,Raipur. State of Maihya Pradesh ,-bhi-ough t'lte- Seorstary Panchgya1;,Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal. Sf Sit M R53SPONDENT; i@Z.^E^iS^N_1JND -^TTCLES..J26/2-2Z.-OBLTrE--^^£^T3^ OP INDIK ^ r« Par'ticulars of -the pet.i-fcionep : As s'fcated in the Gause Ti-tle above. Partiaulars of -ths raspondents : As stated in the aause title above. y XI-HC-22 ^-5,''.?iTn?p(, -^fRFre, i^di'yy W,P^to.....223/20.Q.1. ^ ^<"{^ 'Vl 21 3TR?i?Ia1:!TTT!?n q5T;ffi:T')ti 'qr'raf '4 reT?! TKii?i1 '^'arpspi -sn^v by Shri Aw^dh no.1 by Sht-i State by Dr. N.K.Shuk|.a, Dy. Advecate Geaeral ?^ Tbe maingrievaace ofjthe writ petitione^, as Tribunal. It is sutaaitted to tbe Returniag O.ffieer in o£ eertain ballot papers in ^yf^— regard to^proper reeeption Tripatbi submits that petition was file^l before the Eleetion Iribunal respondent no.1 ohat.leiigiiig the Election o£ petitioner. It is confcended that in the election i-t was clearly ave^red tbat certain ballot have been improperlyi received and counted in 1 of the writ petition^r. Ihe writ petitioner 1 th®•electionpetjttion. Ihe issues were framedi Lenc^were adduced and |the parties were finally heard, stage the Electioq' Tribunal was of the view would be faif to ret-count the ballot papers ot •Uae averments majde in the pleadj.ngs and also in the light Q£ argaaents feidyanced on behal-C of tfae f^ o.^ Hi'3?! niW ('qqFiaiqeT; i-^-: / STFc^l '^'??n^?^ 'tll'fl' ^r-Erfeiit''; vrKv^ i; T^S ''FSKSR ^i'STJiBC 3Tit:iT issued on 20.2, "As regards interin ^rayer, I direet that Return has been fip.ed. It has been state'd on of the respoadent jno.1 tbat recoynt ,liw^ been be-Cere the order of this Court was coiamunicated Election Tribunal.i In the said reeount as aany the writ petitiojaer. Iq view of this tbough the All the ballst pap^rs eoneeriaing the writ petitJ.oner and the respondent no«4 I^'ave been brought before this :. Thelrejected and se^n by tiiree view o£ papers were n It appears that anjr other dispute eannot be 1 raised before ttiis Courl; aad^as much as the disputed .*• \- facts are gone into onlyjate by the conpetent authority, GRPRJ—FS/3!1—1/2001—?0.000. 7S| '::TTTW';ra, rifli-9'16, '-l''' e<-3^i.-sr< "•SFf •3'1^?i ^ViVK i'gf^l iSSSSs :'°~is;s>ais ctii-iit""-^i-l ^ITT??! 1113^~ ftil'OT: ^? srRtTq sn^CT 3, 1 -i have was coam this »f^v •' should win on |the It is not £orIthis same time whoever of tbe taidalE wins tbe electlon. Let it l|>e deteraine^in accordance •^'»v\S7h ;C^-l-i./" 1 <^/-^!\ This petition is di^posed o£ witb the above Needless to say tha'f: the petitioner is at litserty thls Court, i£'\ Tribunal Tbe ballot papers w(iich have been brought be which brought these papers. •. Sd/- • ChiefJustice '\-/' [T-'^tfigq \"; '•^