IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.1787 of 2005 Between: Ahmed Hussain Khan S/o. Late Mohd. Hussain Khan, R/o. H.No. 9-4-87/75, Owaisi Colony, Toli Chowki, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Station House Officer, Police Station, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District. 2 Superintendent of Police, Ranga Reddy District, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. 3 Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. 4 K. Krishna Reddy S/o. Ramachandra Reddy, H.No. 9-1-41/27, Prashanth Nagar, Langar House, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent dt. 3-2-2005, in sending two(2) constables to the Petitioner's house for compelling his attendance to the P.S. Moinabad for the settlement of Civil dispute between the petitioner and 4th Respondent, as illegal, void and violative of Fundamental Rights guaranteed by the constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondent No.1 not to compel the petitioner to attend P.S. Moinabad for the settlement of Civil dispute, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MOHD.ZIA-UL-HAQ Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.1787 of 2005 ORDER: This writ petition has been filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in interfering with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the 4th respondent as illegal and arbitrary. A counter has been filed stating that police never interfered with civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the 4th respondent. The respondents denied all the allegations made in the writ petition stating that they never interfered with civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the 4th respondent. Infact, the said disputed question of fact cannot be decided in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 24-04-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRT}