IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11076 of 2011 AJAHAR ALI, SON OF MAZAMMIL HAQUE Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 18.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner being husband of the complainant is languishing in jail custody since 19.01.2011. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that an attempt of reconciliation was taken before learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Purnea and both parties expressed their willingness to lead their conjugal life with each other but learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Purnea rejected the bail application of the petitioner noticing this fact that the petitioner was not ready to execute any undertaking before the Court. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Complaint Case No. 90 of 2003. Learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Purnea shall fix a date for reconciliation by issuing notice to the complainant and the petitioner and shall take all possible steps to patch up the dispute of the parties but if he fails in his attempt on account of fault of the petitioner, the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Purnea shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. It is needless to say that if learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Purnea fails in his 2 attempt on account of fault of the complainant, the bail bonds of the petitioner shall not be cancelled. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )