IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC(T) No. 381 of 2008 Decided on: 28.10.2010 Dr. Lalit Gupta …Petitioner. Versus Sh. Deepak Shanan …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : None. For the respondent : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Since the petitioner has been appointed, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Moreover, the only direction issued by the erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal was not to declare the result till the representation of the petitioner is not decided. 2. Consequently, the present petition is dismissive having become infructuous. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 28, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?