IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.158 of 2009 LAXMAN CHAUDHARY & ORS Versus DIV. MANAGER,ORI.INS.CO.LTD.&O ----------- 3. 18.02.2009 This application has been filed for modification of this Court’s order dated 25.11.2008 whereby under M.A. No.194 of 2007 the petitioner/appellant was allowed a compensation of Rs.1, 70, 000/- under motor accident claim. Mr. Nand Kishore Sinha, the learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant points out that the total amount of claim i.e. Rs.1, 70, 000/- has been correctly mentioned in the order but there is typographical mistake, inasmuch as, the consortium amount to Rs.5000/- as is allowable and which in fact was allowed under the order could not be mistakably typed or mentioned in the order under the break up of amounts as claim of Rs.5000/- as loss of consortium. The learned counsel points out that the break up of the amounts as typed in the order is as follows:- (i) Rs.1, 60, 000/- (compensation amount), Rs. 2500/- loss of estate, Rs. 2000/- funeral expenses and Rs.500/- as medical expenses. The learned counsel further pointed out that the total claim amount as allowed is of Rs. 1, 70, 000/- but the total break up amount comes to 1, 65, 000/- only and that due to typing mistake the amount of Rs.5000/- as loss of consortium is not shown and which requires to be corrected. Mr. Rajan Sahay and Shambhu Sharan Singh do not make - 2 - any objection to the prayer of the petitioner/appellant for rectification of the mistake as prayed to be corrected. In the circumstance, the order dated 25.11.2008 as passed under M.A. No.194 of 2007 is modified to the extent that in the 7th line from bottom of the order, the amount of Rs.5000/- will be deemed to have been included as loss of consortium amongst break up figures of the claim amounts making total claim of Rs. 1, 70, 000/- as has already been allowed earlier. This modification petitioner is accordingly, allowed. (C.M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-