IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17393 of 2010 1. SITAL SAH S/O LATE LAXMI NARAYAN SAH 2. PRAMILA DEVI W/O SITAL SAH 3. SEEMA DEVI W/O DEEPAK SAH ALL R/O VILLAGE- ABJUGANJ, P.S. SULTANGANJ, DISTRICT- BHAGALPUL ………………… Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………. Opposite Party ----------- 2. 12.01.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 04.11.2009 passed by Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur in Cr. Revision No. 185/2009 by which he has refused to interfere in the order dated 2.4.2009 passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Bhagalpur in G.R. Case No. 1986/2004 by which the Magistrate has allowed examination of some witnesses under Section 311 Cr.P.S. From the order impugned, I find that the charge sheet named witnesses were allegedly gained over by the accused and, therefore the application was filed for examination of 5 witnesses who were non-charge sheet witnesses. Since the court below was of the opinion that their examination was essential for just decision of the case, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. However, the value of the evidence of this non-charge sheeted witnesses will still be open to question by the accused persons at the relevant stage. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )