IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 16 OF 1999 TRANSPORT & DOCK WORKERS UNION ... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ... Respondent Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. R. Raghuwanshi, Asst. Solicitor General & Ms. Rutiya Ambekar for Respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. J. Vaz, Central Government Standing Counsel for the Respondent nos. 1 and 2. Coram:- B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 20th April, 2009 ORAL ORDER Advocate Raghuvanshi, Addl. Solicitor General of India, appearing for Respondent nos. 1 and 2, states that the grievance of the petitioners have been ventilated and he places on record the communication dated 28.08.2008, issued by Joint Secretary, Ministry of Shipping Road Transport & Highways, to his office in this respect. He states that appropriate notification in relation to its implementation is being issued as early as possible. 2. In view of the statement, which is supported by the communication, (xerox copy placed on record), we find that the grievance of petitioners made in this Writ Petition has been ventilated. Petition is, therefore, disposed off as infructuous. 3. Rule discharged. No costs. B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. U. D. SALVI, J. arp/*