IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24642 of 2010 BADRI PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02-08-2010 Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution for offences under sections 302/120B and other allied offences under the Indian Penal Code as also under section 27 of the Arms Act and under sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, the petitioner and 13 other persons are named in the F.I.R. vide Annexure-1 as accused. It is submitted that even according to the prosecution case, the entire occurrence has taken place because of certain land dispute between the parties. Co-accused Jaddu Paswan is specifically alleged to have killed one Ajay Kumar and co-accused Shyam Paswan is alleged to have killed one Bechan Paswan. Though petitioner is also alleged to have been armed with rifle, but he is not alleged to have participated in the said firing. It is further highlighted that co-accused Tuntun Paswan and co-accused Shyam Paswan, besides others, have been granted bail by different Benches of this Court. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif in connection with S.T. No. 291 of 2010, subject to the conditions that (a) one of the bailors must be government servant, (b) Another bailor must be the family member of 2 the petitioner, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner; (c) if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of case in future, then in that case the informant/prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned, (d) the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. Sujit (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)