IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15960 of 2009 HARENDRA PRASAD SINGH,son of late Baleshwar Singh,resident of Dumraon Road Bikramganj, Ward No.2, House No.439, P.S.- Bikramganj, District-Rohtas. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 12-05-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that for repayment of the loan petitioner’s son issued three cheques, which were bounced and thereafter any occurrence took place. In my view once legal action was taken i.e. cheques were produced and bounced and notice was also sent, there could be no occasion of coming of the complainant to the petitioner’s house where alleged rest occurrence took place and some of the offences specifically for 406 and 420 of the Penal Code are not made out as specific offence is there, that is under Section 138 of the N.I.Act. Allegation for the offence under Section 379 of the Penal Code is super addition. I find much fault on behalf of the complainant; even petitioner is apprehending his arrest, which in no case can be justified. Accordingly, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No.105/2008, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Bikramganj, District-Rohtas, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )