IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32854 of 2011 Shashi Ranjan Pandey Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 24.10.2011 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 392 & 411 of the Penal Code is that the petitioner is not named. His name has transpired in the confession of a co-accused only and from para 4 of the impugned order it is submitted that even that confession does not allege his participation during occurrence but only subsequent presence at the lodge. The petitioner is stated to have no antecedent. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM East Champaran, Motihari in Turkaulia PS Case No. 418 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Snkumar/ (Navin Sinha,J.)