IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU WRIT PETITION NO.8709 of 2008 Between: M.Anantha Ramulu S/o.Ayodhyay Ramiah, Managing Partner of Shiva Parboiled Modern Rice Mill, R/o. Huzurnagar, Nalgonda District. ...PETITIONER AND 1 The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Kodad. 2 The Commercial Tax Officer, Kodad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the demand notice dt. 13.3.2007 issued by the 1st respondent without issuing certified copies of the assessment orders for the assessment year 1998-1999, 2000-01 f or collection of the disputed taxes of Rs.9,25,008/- for the above said years issued by the 1st respondent is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the APGST ACt, 1957 and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to issue certified copies of the assessment orders for the assessment years 1998-99, 2000-01 and grant such other relief or reliefs as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KUNUKUDURGAPRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: MR.K.RAJI REDDY(SPL.SC FOR CT) The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU WRIT PETITION NO.8709 of 2008 ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Mr Justice B.Prakash Rao) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order complained against has already been served and nothing remains to be adjudicated in the Writ Petition. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) __________________ (C.Y.SOMAYAJULU, J) 28th April 2008 RRB