-1- mgj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.5131 of 2007 with (1) Civil Application No.1947 of 2007 with (2) Civil Application No.2360 of 2007 with Civil Application No. 2994 of 2007 Dyaneshwar Sadba Tupe ..Petitioner vs. Agricultural Produce Market Committee and another ..Respondents None for petitioner. Shri V.S.Tadake i/b Shri M.L.Patil for respondent no.1. Shri R.G.Ketkar for respondent no.2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.N.PATEL & J.N.PATEL & J.N.PATEL & S.J.KATHAWALLA S.J.KATHAWALLA S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. JJ. JJ. 28th November, 2008 28th November, 2008 28th November, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. We have been informed by the learned counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation that the petitions which were filed by the persons who had undertaken unauthorised construction have been dismissed by this Court and that the Corporation would now proceed in accordance with law against such persons who have erected unauthorised structures in the market yard of respondent no.1 Committee from the stage the proceedings were -2- stayed during the pendency of the petitions filed by such persons. In view of this statement, we do not find that this Court is required to pass any further order in the matter. We, therefore, dispose of this petition by directing the A.P.M.C. Pune and the Municipal Corporation to proceed in the matter of unauthorised structures constructed in the market yard by the persons without obtaining proper sanction in accordance with law. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. 3. In view of disposal of the writ petition the civil applications do not survive and hence dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (J.N.PATEL J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (J.N.PATEL J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (J.N.PATEL J.)