IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13725 of 2008 SAMITA KUMARI @ DEVI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 02 16.02.2010 The claim in this writ application is to be considered for appointment on the post of Anganbari Sewika. These issues are amenable to consideration afresh by the District Programme Officer under the regulation, an appeal against which lies before the District Magistrate by the aggrieved. Learned counsel for the State submits that he has instruction to state that perhaps the representation of the petitioner has been disposed. If it has been disposed by the District Programme Officer and the petitioner be aggrieved, her remedy lies before the appellate authority. If her representation has not be disposed by the District Programme Officer, but by the C.D.P.O. or any other Officer, on an application made by the petitioner, the District Programme Officer shall be required to apply his mind afresh and then pass a reasoned and speaking order, preferably within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/presentation of such application, unless the District Programme Officer 2 has already passed appropriate orders, as discussed above. The writ application stands disposed. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)