IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Bail Cancellation Application No.05 of 2010 Order on the Bail cancellation application. CRIMINAL SIDE Smt. Sabnam Khan W/o Habbibur Rahman @ Guddu D/o Late Bajeer Khan R/o Vikash Marg Near Shisu Mandir Pauri, Pauri Garhwal At present R/o Nauti Road, Uppar Bazar, Karnaprayag, District Chamoli ......Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand & another ......Opposite party Dated: May 10, 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri D.C.S. Rawat, Advocate for the applicant and Sri Amit Bhatt, Additional Government Advocate for the State. By way of this bail cancellation application, the applicant has prayed to cancel the bail of the accused Habbibur Rahman @ Guddu (respondent no.2) granted by In-charge Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pauri Garhwal on 22.3.2010 in Case Crime No.407 of 2010 relating to offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 506 of IPC and one under Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act registered at P.S. Pauri, District Pauri Garhwal. Against the impugned bail order dated 22.3.2010, the applicant had also filed bail cancellation application before learned Sessions Judge, Pauri, which was dismissed vide order dated 8.4.2010. I have perused the bail order dated 22.3.2010 passed by In-charge Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pauri Garhwal and also the findings recorded by the trial court while granting bail to the accused Habbibur Rahman @ Guddu as well as perused the order dated 8.4.2010 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Pauri. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on file, I do not find any ground to cancel the bail of the accused Habbibur Rahman @ Guddu. The order of In-charge Chief Judicial Magistrate granting bail to the accused is correct and requires no interference by this Court. The bail cancellation application is accordingly rejected. (Dharam Veer, J.) 10.5.2010 RG