IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.3110 OF 2008 State Bank of India ...Plaintiff Vs. Shrikant D. Kadav ...Defendant --- Mr. Sangano Dalmade i/b. Goenka Law Associates for Plaintiff None for Defendant ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 4TH AUGUST, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff. 2. None appears on behalf of the Defendant though he has served. 3. The Plaintiff has filed affidavit of service. Though the writ of summons is served on the Defendant, none appears on behalf of the Defendant. The Plaintiff has filed compilation of the original documents. The Plaintiff is a bank and has advanced an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- in favour of the Defendant towards the personal loan and an agreement to that effect was executed between the parties. Whereas the Defendant had agreed to repay the said amount to the Plaintiff with interest. The Defendant, however, was not regular in payment of installments of the loan and as such, notice was issued by the Plaintiff to the Defendant to pay an amount of Rs. 94,923/-. In spite of service of notice, the amount was not paid. Since the Defendant has not filed his appearance within 10 days from the date of writ of summons, the Plaintiff is entitled for judgment and decree. The suit is, accordingly, allowed in terms of prayer clause 15(a). Suit is, accordingly, disposed of with costs. 4. Refund of Court fee is allowed in accordance with rules. V.M. KANADE J.