IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11967 of 2011 DEVENDRA SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH VIGILANCE ----------- 02. 06.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Vigilance. This is repeat application seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 477A, 109, 120B, 419 and 409 IPC as also under the provisions of prevention of Corruption Act. Earlier petitioner had moved this Court for anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No. 20029 of 2009. This Court granted him privilege of bail which was confined to the period of investigation only. It is submitted that nothing tangible has come against the petitioner during investigation; still charge-sheet has been submitted. It is next contended that some of the similarly placed accused persons have been released on anticipatory bail. Learned counsel in this regard refers to the orders contained in Annexures-14 and 15. It is also contended that there is no allegation that he has ever misused the privilege of bail. In my view, petitioner should surrender in the court below and apply for regular bail bringing to the notice of the court all the relevant facts including submissions made before this Court. If the petitioner surrenders and applies for bail, the 2 court below shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law keeping in view all the relevant facts appearing from records. While disposing of the said application the court below shall not be influenced by present order passed by this Court. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )