IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2009 / 15TH POUSHA 1930 RP.No. 1330 of 2008(Y) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.22042/2008 Dated 24/07/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): WRIT PETITIONER IN WPC -------------------------------------------- M/S.HINDALCO INDUSTRIES LTD. ALUPURAM P.O. KALAMASSERY (FORMERLY INDIAN ALUMINIUM CO.) REPRESENTED BY ITS HEAD ALUPURAM WORKS B.J.ALEXANDER. BY ADV. SMT.S.K.DEVI RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS IN WPC --------------------------------- 1. THE ASST.COMMISSIONER (ASSMT) II COMMERCIAL TAXES, SPL.CIRCLE III, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE INSPECTING ASST.COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXES, KAKKANAD, KOCHI - 30. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.PRADEEP THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- R.P.1330/2008 in W.P.(C).22042/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 5th day of January, 2009 ORDER Learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that in spite of the directions issued by this Court requiring the first respondent to serve on the petitioner a notice of demand pursuant to Ext.P3, that has not been done. I am of the view that this is not a matter for review of the judgment. I also take note of the fact that the petition for review filed by the State was dismissed by a detailed order. I do not find any grounds to review the judgment. Review Petition is accordingly dismissed. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs