IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13845 of 2011 NARESH SAO S/O LATE JANAK SAO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 05.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 269, 272, 273 and 290 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47 (A) of Excise Act. 20 liters of Mahua liquor and 25 K.G. Gur were recovered. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that recovery has been made from the joint family house and moreover, the petitioner has never been involved in any other case. It appears that seizure was made on 13.10.2010 when the seizure list was transmitted to the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on 19.07.2010. The delayed transmission of the prosecution clouds the bonafide of the accusation, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be 2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 292 of 2010 arising out of G.R. No. 2222 of 2010, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Indian Penal Code. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)