1 wp8534.sxw ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8534 OF 2010 Brig.Pradip Kumar Dasgupta ...Petitioner vs. Aniruddha Seolekar & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Mahesh Rawool i/b Mr.Rajeev Matkar and Mr.V.V.Salunke for the petitioner None for the respondents CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 15,2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is not in dispute that the revision application preferred by the petitioner against the impugned order is pending before the State Government. The learned counsel for the petitioner makes a grievance that the application for stay in the said application has not been decided. 2 As the petitioner has already invoked revisional jurisdiction of the State Government, this petition need not be entertained and the same is disposed of by keeping all contentions of the parties open. If the application for stay made by the petitioner is not yet decided till today, the same shall be decided within a period of four weeks from today. Hearing of the revision application is expedited. JUDGE