IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.774 of 2010 1. MD. NASIMUDDIN @ AJMERI @ NASEEM MIAN S/O LATE MD. NASEERUDDIN R/O MOHALLA LAL MIAN KA DARGAH, P.S. PHULWARI SHARIF, DISTT. PATNA Versus 1. THE ZONAL MANAGER, INDIAN BANK ZONAL OFFICE OF INDIAN BANK, CALCUTTA 2. ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY, INDIAN BANK, GOVIND BHAWAN, NEW DAK BUNGLOW ROAD, PATNA 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER OF INDIAN BANK SARSONA, MUZAFFARPUR 02/ 08.02.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Bank. Having perused the impugned order of dismissal contained in letter dated 25.7.2007, I am of the view that petitioner should avail the remedy of appeal and satisfy the appellate authority that he has not played any active role in the matrimonial dispute between his brother- in-law and his wife and on account of such matrimonial dispute, he should not be dismissed from service of the Bank. With the aforesaid liberty, this writ application is disposed of. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)