FARAD CONTINUTION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Misc Civil Application No.l3 of 2006 -------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office Court or Judge’s Order Memorandum of Coram appearence,Court’s Orders & Directions and Registrar’s Order --------------------------------------------------- Mrs Shilpa Joshi for applicant Mr A R Pitale for respondent no.l CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. DATED 13.6.2006 DATED 13.6.2006 DATED 13.6.2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. Hearing of this petition was deferred to facilitate the parties to explore possibility of settlement. It appears that the revised offer given by the applicant is not acceptable to the respondent. Be that as it may. As the settlement is not possible by consent hearing of this application is proceeded forthwith. Considering the averments made in the application in paras 7 to 9, which in my opinion are sufficient cause for showing indulgence to the applicant wife. In the circumstances, in the interest of justice the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) with no order as to costs.