IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 1196 of 2011 Date of decision: 29.7.2011 Jinda Hassan … Petitioner versus Liyakat and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. Roopak Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. C.B.Goel, Advocate for the respondents ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit for declaration, permanent injunction and possession, titled Jinda Hassan v. Liyakat and others, seeking declaration that sale-deed No. 881 dated 6.11.2001 is wrong, illegal, null and void and not binding on his rights. The suit was dismissed vide judgment and decree dated 8.4.2010 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Panipat. Plaintiff then preferred an appeal. Lower appellate Court vide order dated 26.8.2010 directed the plaintiff- appellant to affix ad-valorem court-fee on or before 25.9.2010. Plaintiff neither challenged the said order nor complied with the same and resultantly, vide order dated 25.9.2010, on account of non-affixation of court-fee, as was ordered, the appeal was ordered to be dismissed. Hence, this revision. Heard. Counsel for the petitioner, in all fairness, prays for only one opportunity to comply with the said orders and to pass affix ad-valorem court-fee. This request has not been seriously opposed by the counsel opposite. In view of this, the present revision is allowed, impugned orders are set aside and the present petitioner is allowed to affix ad-valorem C.R. No. 1196 of 2011 -2- court-fee on or before 30.8.2011, on which date the parties shall also appear before the trial Court failing which the present revision would be deemed to have been dismissed. July 29, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE