1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Revision Application No. 106 of 2010 Manish S/o Ashok Pimple V/s. Ajit S/o Vasant Sardesai ......................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ......................................................................................................................................... Mr. S. M. Ghodeswar, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. U. P. Deopujari, Advocate for the respondent CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 30th NOVEMBER, 2011. This Revision Application challenges the Judgment and Order dated 29/06/2002, passed by learned Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nagpur, dismissing the Reg. Civil Suit No. 1385/98 filed under Section 6 of the Specific Reliefs Act for restoration of possession and injunction. The claim of the applicant/plaintiff before the trial Court was that he was tenant in respect of two rooms for running the computer institution and the defendant had illegally dispossessed him from one room in the month of September-1998. The trial Court has recorded the finding that the applicant/plaintiff has failed to establish his 2 possession over the room in question and on that count, dismissed the suit. The trial Court has taken into consideration the evidence of the witnesses examined by the plaintiff and has held that there is variance in the pleadings and proof as undisputedly there was no agreement of tenancy in writing and there is nothing on record except the oral evidence of PW-1 to PW-4 to show that the two rooms were let out to the applicant/plaintiff. The trial Court has disbelieved the evidence of these witnesses. Apart from this, it is not the case of the applicant/plaintiff that the defendant broke open the lock and entered in one room in question. There is no specific date on which it is alleged that the event of dispossession took place. In view of this, no fault can be found with the view taken by the trial Court on appreciation of the evidence. There is no jurisdictional error brought to my notice. Hence, Civil Revision Application is dismissed. JUDGE Punde