T.A.No.189 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH T.A.No.189 of 2009 Date of Decision : 28.5.2009 Bridgestone India Pvt. Ltd. .... Petitioner Versus M/s R.S.Tyres Traders ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Pawan Gaur, Advocate for the petitioner. ... MAHESH GROVER, J. The only ground which has been taken for transfer of case titled as “M/s R.S.Tyres Traders v. Managing Director, Bridgestone India Private Limited and others”, pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Sr.Division), Karnal is that the subsequent suit filed by the respondent is a counter blast to the suit which is earlier in time. The apprehension expressed by the petitioner is that the Court in which the subsequent suit has been filed does not have the jurisdiction. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the ground taken up by the petitioner is totally without any merit. The question of jurisdiction is within the domain T.A.No.189 of 2009 -2- of the trial Court if such a question is raised before it. In so far as the contention that the subsequent suit is a counter blast to the earlier suit is concerned, that cannot constitute to be a ground for transfer of proceedings. No ground. Dismissed. 28.5.2009 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss