1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 594 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 758 OF 2004 A.S. Oomer and Ors. ... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Y.H. Muchala, Sr. Counsel with Mr. S.A. Khan for Petitioner. Mr. A. Sayed, A.G.P. for R.No. 1. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : AUGUST 04, 2006 DATE : AUGUST 04, 2006 DATE : AUGUST 04, 2006 P.C.: C.: C.: . None present for the Respondent No. 2. By the present motion, the Petitioners pray for a direction to Respondent No. 3 to dispose of the application being Application No. 38 of 2003 pending before it. Earlier the Petitioner trust was listed as Waqf. Subsequent to that the committee came to be appointed as there were various objections by the parties. The committee submitted an interim report on 29.10.2004 and have now identified as to which are the waqfs and which are the trusts in Mumbai area. In so far as Petitioners are concerned, they are listed at Sr. No. 119 as a trust. Considering that the motion is allowed in terms of Prayer clause (a). The Respondent No. 3 is directed to dispose of the pending 2 application at the earliest. That will be subject to the final order in this petition. . With the above observations, motion disposed of. (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.)