IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6663 of 2009 DHIRAJ KUMAR UPADHYAY Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 2. 22.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though he had given attested photo copy of the revised medical report to the respondents, the petitioner is agreeable to present the original before them. The impugned order dated 26.2.2009 at Annexure-6 does not shut him out from reconsideration absolutely, but declines to do so only because he did not produce his original medical documents for re-examination. The order does not suffer from any infirmity at this stage to warrant interference. Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that the petitioner shall be submitting his original medical papers in terms of the requirement at Annexure-6. If the petitioner does so, this Court directs that the candidature of the petitioner shall be then considered appropriately and a proper decision taken expeditiously without unnecessary delay. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)