IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.4.2011 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.9893 of 2011 DR.KUMUDHA RATHNA [ PETITIONER ] Vs 1 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR TAMILNADU STATE MARKETING CORPORATION LTD. (TASMAC), THALAMUTHU NATARAJAN BUILDINGS GANDHI IRWIN ROAD, EGMORE, CHENNAI-8. 2 THE SENIOR REGIONAL MANAGER TAMIL NADU STATE MARKETING CORPORATION LTD (TASMAC) LLA BUILDINGS, MOUNT ROAD CHENNAI-2. 3 THE DISTRICT MANAGER TAMIL NADU STATE MARKETING CORPORATION LTD. (TASMAC) SOUTH CHENNAI NO.B.4, AMBATTUR INDUSTRIAL ESTATE AMBATTUR CHENNAI-58. [ RESPONDENTS ] Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the Respondents 1 to 3 from running TASMAC Wine Shop No.979 and the Bar in the premises of the petitioner at Old Door No.7, New Door No.11, Sir Theagaraya Road, T.Nagar, Chennai- 600 017, without any valid Lease Agreement and No Objection Certificate from the Petitioner and consequently direct the respondents to vacate the said premises of the Petitioner by considering and passing orders on the Representations of the Petitioner dated 24.11.2010 and 05.01.2011. For petitioner : Ms.P.Bhuvaneswari For respondents : Mr.J.Ravindran O R D E R Mr.J.Ravindran, the learned counsel, takes notice for the respondents. 2. Though the prayer is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the third respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 5.1.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the third respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 5.1.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as to the other persons concerned, if any, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 5.1.2011, to the third respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Connected M.P.No.1 of 2011 is closed. lan Sd/- Asst. Registrar //True Copy// Sub Asst. Registrar To: 1 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR TAMILNADU STATE MARKETING CORPORATION LTD. (TASMAC), THALAMUTHU NATARAJAN BUILDINGS GANDHI IRWIN ROAD, EGMORE, CHENNAI-8. 2 THE SENIOR REGIONAL MANAGER TAMIL NADU STATE MARKETING CORPORATION LTD (TASMAC) LLA BUILDINGS, MOUNT ROAD CHENNAI-2. 3 THE DISTRICT MANAGER TAMIL NADU STATE MARKETING CORPORATION LTD. (TASMAC) SOUTH CHENNAI NO.B.4, AMBATTUR INDUSTRIAL ESTATE AMBATTUR CHENNAI-58. + 1 cc to Mr. J. Ravindran, Advocate SR No.27283 + 1 cc to Mr. P. Bhuvaneswari, Advocate SR No.27187 SSK(CO) SR/20.4.2011 Writ Petition No.9893 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/