Misc. Application no. 3963/06 IN W.P. No. 1290 (ss)04. Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri M.C. Kandpal, learned Sr. Counsel for the applicant/petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents on the application. This application has been moved by 37 applicant/petitioners nos. 3 to 12, 14 to 18, 20 to 28 & 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 38, 40,41, 43, 44, 45, 54 & 55, namely, Lalita Prasad, Pancham Singh, Trilok Singh, Surman Singh, Ghanshyam Singh, Chandra Mohan, Subedar Singh, Yashwant Singh, Kalyan Singh, Rameshwar Prasad, Pratap Singh, Maal Singh, Trilok Singh, Anand Mani, Vijay Singh, Lok Mani, Surendra Singh, Anand Singh, Sate Singh, Goverdan Prasad, Hari Dutt, Rudra Singh, Sudama Singh, Madan Singh, Vijay Singh, Wachaspati, Siromani, Kishan Singh, Jag Mohan Singh, Sateshwar Prasad, Sangram Singh, Jag Mohan Singh, Satish Chandra, Hoshiyar Singh, Satish Chandra, Bhagat Ram, & Veer Singh, with a prayer that they may be permitted to delete their names from the array of parties. Allowed. Let the necessary deletion be made during the course of the day. Application is disposed of accordingly. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) 07.04.2006: NCM: W.P. No. 1290 (ss)04. Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri M.C. Kandpal, learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised by means of this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court delivered on 04.03.2006 passed in Special Appeal no. 66 of 2005 (State of Uttaranchal and ors. vs. Pushkar Bhatt and ors.), as such, the present writ petition may also be disposed of on the same terms and observations expressed in the aforesaid judgment. In view of the aforesaid statement the present writ petition is also disposed of on the same terms and observations made in Special Appeal no. 66 of 2005 (State of Uttaranchal and ors. vs. Pushkar Bhatt and ors.) delivered on 04.03.2006. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) 07.04.2006: NCM: