IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 20243 of 2008 Between: T.Jagadishwaraiah S/o.Bhadraiah Guduru village,Kamalapur Mandal Karimnagar District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer,Karimnagar karimnagar District 2 The Tahsildar,Kamalapur Mandal, Karimnagar District 3 The Joint Collector, Civil Supplies,Karimnagar Karimnagar District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the order dated 3.7.2008 in proceedings No.K/2647/2008 passed by the 1st respondent herein whereby suspending the authorization of the petitioner Shop No.1411 Guduru village,Kamalapur Mandal, Karimnagar District and also the action of the 3rd respondent in not passing the orders in the Appeal ﬁled against the order dated 3.7.2008 passed by the 1st respondent herein as illegal, arbitrary,and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 20243 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner herein is an authorized dealer of fair price shop No.1411 of Guduru village, Kamalapur Mandal, Karimnagar District. This Writ Petition is ﬁled challenging the order passed by the ﬁrst respondent dated 03.07.2008 thereby suspending the authorization of the petitioner pending enquiry on the allegation that the petitioner had contravened the conditions of the authorization as well as the provisions of the A.P. Public Distribution System (Control) Order 2001. Though various grounds have been raised by the petitioner assailing the impugned proceedings, I am not inclined to express any opinion on merits since against the impugned order an eﬃcacious alternative remedy of appeal is available to the petitioner under Statute before the third respondent. As a matter of fact, the petitioner has already preferred such an appeal along with an application for stay and the same are pending. In the circumstances without expressing any opinion on merits, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the third respondent to dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order of the ﬁrst respondent dated 03.07.2008 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs. ------------------- G. ROHINI, J. 24.09.2008 C.C. tomorrow B/o kvsn ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KURR}