CWP (T) 11386 of 2008 24.11.2009 Present: Ms. Meena Thakur, vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.K. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Mr. J.K. Verma and Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General, for the State. Learned vice counsel for the petitioner submits that her client has already taken the brief from her. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. (R.B. Misra), ACJ. (Rajiv Sharma), J. 24th November,2009 (Purohit) CWP (T) 11367 of 2008 24.11.2009 Present: Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate for the respondents. Mr. Chauhan fairly submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous with the revocation of the suspension of the petitioner. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (R.B. Misra), ACJ. (Rajiv Sharma), J. 24th November,2009 (Purohit) CWP (T) 13097 of 2008 24.11.2009 Present: Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.K. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Mr. J.K. Verma and Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General, for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client has taken away the brief from him. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. (R.B. Misra), ACJ. (Rajiv Sharma), J. 24th November,2009 (Purohit) CWP (T) 15386 of 2008 10.11.2009 Present: Mr. Hamender Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 5. Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.6. The petitioner had already completed two years five months service at the present place of posting. Consequently, this court will not exercise its extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. (R.B. Misra), ACJ. (Rajiv Sharma), J. 10th November,2009 (Purohit) Cr. Appeal No. 611 of 1996 alongwith Cr. Appeal No. 433 of 1998 18.6.2010 Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl.AG., and Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy.AG., for the respondent. The earlier order was passed on 10th May, 2010 is as under:- “Sh. Vivek Thakur, Advocate submits that S/Sh. T.R.Chandel and Jagdish Vats have no instructions to appear on behalf of the accused. Accused was also represented by Sh. R.P. Singh Rana and Ms. Punam Tanwar, Advocates. Ms. Punam Tanwar is no longer in practice. Notice be sent to Sh. R.P. Singh Rana, Advocate returnable for 16th June, 2010, at his following address: Shri R.P. Singh Rana, Advocate, R/O 1143, Urban Estate, Phase-I, Jallandhar (Punjab).” Now in sequel to the earlier order, it appears that notice was served to Sh. R.P. Singh Rana. Again notice be served, on the address indicated above, returnable for 12th August, 2010. (R.B. Misra), J. (V.K. Sharma), J. 18th June, 2010 (Purohit)