@ (9 S€N§LE BEMH whm?” BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR [CHHA’I‘TISGARH) w.P. (C) No. 5am of 2010 / PETITIONER Nilmani Yadav, S/o .Vallu ,Ram Yadav, .aged about 40 years, R/o Sanjay Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS / RESPONDENTS l) State of Chhattisgarh Through-The Secretaiy Transport Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (0G, ) 2) State ’ Transport Appellate Tribunal, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (c.G.) 3) Regional Transport Authority Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Secretary Regional Transport Authority Raipur, Distt. R‘aipur (C.G.) 5) Kaushilya Devi, Transporter Nawapara, Rajirn, Distt. Raipur (co) g WRIT. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR, ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR MANDAMUS/ DIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. HEG%§ COURT OF C?§HATT!SG&RH §T B!LAS?§JR WRIT PETI?ION [Cl NO‘ 5312 0? 29m Pa§§tiuney Niimani Yadav Versus Resgcndents State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRaT PETmcN UNaER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE cowsnTufION or: INDIA {$3 : Han’me Mr. Satish K. Agniham, J.) Present :- Shri B.K.Chakrabarty, Advobaie for the pe£itionet ShriA.V.Shridhar, Pane! Lawyer for the Statef respondents No. 1 to 4. O§E§§ (QERU (Passed on 7‘“ day of October? 201 0) 1. 8y this peikioni the pet'Moner hae approached this Court against the order dated 82.20%0 (Annexure P—t) passed by the Regional Transport Authority, Raipur, when there is a provision of Statutory appeai before the State Transport Appeiia‘te Tribunei. 2. The reasons assigned by the petitioner is that since there is a deiay in preferring an appeat before the State Transport Appeitate Tribunai, the petitioner has chosen to tiie this petition. This cannot be a ground for invoking extraordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court. it there is a statutory appeai and no other speciai grounds are avaitabie to the petitioner, he has to take recourse to statutory appeat. it there is a delay, it is for the petitioner to get the same condoned: if permissibte in accordance with iaw, before the appeilate authority. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order asto costs. " i sdl- ‘ Satish K.Agnihotri Judge