THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.24292 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners state that their ancestor, late Melpati Venkataswamychetty, owned an extent of 10 acres of land, in Sy.Nos.521, 523 and 532 of Perur Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Chittoor District, and out of it, an extent of Ac.0.38 ½ cents in Sy.No.523 was sold by the father and uncles of the petitioners in favour of Smt.Sudhabala, in the year 1979. That land, in turn, is said to have been sold in favour of the 3rd respondent, in the year 2008. A lay-out is said to have been obtained by respondents 3 and 4, in respect of the said land. The grievance of the petitioners is that the 2nd respondent has sanctioned lay-out, without verifying the boundaries of the land and examining the title. This writ petition is filed with a prayer to quash the lay-out, sanctioned in favour of respondents 3 and 4, vide proceedings dated 10-10-2008, issued by the 2nd respondent, on the ground that it is contrary to the Clauses contained in G.O.Ms.No.302, Municipal Administration and Urban Development (M) Department, dated 15-04-2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, and learned counsel for the respondents. From a perusal of the affidavit, filed in support of the writ petition, and on hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, it is evident that the grievance of the petitioners is mostly, about the boundary dispute. They do no deny the fact that the land in respect of which, the lay-out was granted; was sold by their family members, way back in the year 1979. Mention is made to the representation of the petitioners, to use the road, passage etc. The 2nd respondent is not supposed to deal with such aspects. In case the petitioners feel that their rights are violated by respondents 3 and 4 herein, they have to file a suit, for declaration of their rights and consequential reliefs; in a Civil Court. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioners to file a suit, to enforce their rights, if any, in a Civil Court. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.11-11-2009. KO