IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.22528-M of 2010 Date of Decision:18.1.2011 Tarsem Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. M.S. Bal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members from the hands of respondents No.4 and 5 as well as arrest respondents No.4 and 5, who are accused in case FIR No.90 dated 6.6.2010 under Sections 302/34 IPC. In pursuance to the order dated 8.11.2010, the status report has been filed. It is stated that the case is still under investigation and the police is trying to nominate and arrest the actual culprits and after completing the investigation, the challan against the actual culprits will be filed in the trial Court immediately. In view of the said report, the present petition is rendered infructuous at this stage and is disposed of as such. However, the investigating agency is directed to submit final report as expeditiously as possible and it is hoped that the investigation shall be fair. 18.1.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE