IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI TUESDAY, THE 22ND DECEMBER 2009 / 1ST POUSHA 1931 CRP.No. 33 of 2003() -------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18/07/2002 IN IA. 3143 /2001 IN AS.405/2001 of DISTRICT COURT, THRISSUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF --------------------------------------------------- MATHEW S/O. ARANGASSERY ANTONY, PAZHAMUKKU DESOM, ANJOOR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO SRI.RAKESH.P. RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS ------------------------------------- 1. THE MANAGER, DHANALAKSHMI BANK, MUNDOOR. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, THRISSUR. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ANJOOR. 4. KERALA STATE, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R2 TO 4 SRI.P.JACOB VARGHESE, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI.VIVEK VARGHESE P.J. FOR R1 THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.Q.BARKATH ALI, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C.R.P.No.33 OF 2003 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2009 ORDER This revision petition has been filed against the order of the District Court, Thrissur in I.A.No.3143/2001 in A.S.No.405/2001 dated 18th July 2002 which is a petition to condone the delay in filing the appeal. A revision will not lie against such an order. Revision petitioner should have filed second appeal challenging the said order. Hence the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as not maintainable. P.Q.BARKATH ALI JUDGE sv.