IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34637 of 2008 1. Phool Mohamad, son of Mustakim, 2. Chanda Devi, wife of Subhash Prasad, both residents of village Rewatit, Police Station Baikunthpur in the district of Gopalganj. Versus 1. State Of Bihar 2. Ramayan Prasad son of late Munshi Prasad vill & P.O. Rewtith P.S. Baikunthpur Dist-Gopalganj ----------- 2 11.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners are not involved in the kidnapping daughter of the informant. The petitioner No. 1 is the brother of the main accused, whereas petitioner No. 2 is the lady and not involved in the said offence. It is also submitted that petitioner No. 1 is living separately in Delhi. The counsel for the petitioner further submitted that girl also speaks of her involvement with Sahabuddin and as such the others have no role to play in the said occurrence. All these aspects may be raised at the stage of framing of charges when the Court will consider whether this petitioner in fact had any role to play in the occurrence. This petition is dismissed with the aforesaid observation. Prakash ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)