IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 11028 of 2005 Between: 1 The Commissioner and Director of School Education, A.P. Hyderabad. 2 The District Educational Officer, Medak District at Sangareddy. 3 State of A.P. Represented by its Principal Secretary to Government Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 M. Ravikumar SGT PS Vasuram Tanda MP Kowdipally Medak District. 2 M. Raja Reddy, SGT PS Marrichettu Tanda MP Kowdipally Medak District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ Certiorari or any other appropriate, Writ order or direction, after calling for the records relating to and connected with the judgement of the Hon'ble A.P. Administrative Tribunal dated 16-6-2004 in OA No. 3066/2004 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and facts of the case and pass such other or further orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner:GP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU Writ Petition No.11028 of 2005 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This writ petition seeks to challenge the order dated 16-6-2004 in O.A.No.3066 of 2004 on the file of Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants and official respondents before Tribunal have submitted that the issue raised in O.A. is covered by the order passed in O.A.No.2495 of 2004 dated 30-4-2004. It is seen from the impugned order that the Tribunal has merely followed the order passed in O.A.No.2495 of 2004 dated 30-4-2004, which had attained finality, and the same is not disputed before us. In the circumstances, the impugned order does not call for interference in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J. ___________________ C.V.RAMULU, J. 10-07-2008 bsc