ttN£K?•• y^'^ S .^ •^ f Before Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisaarh At Bilaspur W. P.(Sl. N0. PETITIONERS <:^ ^'\4^.w91' U ^ ^u \¥^T- To^'" ^9 .^'" '^'' ^- ^.^•\^ ''1C^'L,-^' €'^'^ ^- ^ ^^^/^ 'IS/ |l|^jS^ l^.c^^ .«ty \,^ v^ y. ^' '^T^^: '^-u RESPONDENTS VERMA 3. Roop Kumar Dhruw Ageabout43year, U.D.T. S/o Shri Brijal Lal Dhruw Govt. PrimarySchool Bailodi Block-Magarload Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) Siya Ram Sahu Age about 46 year, Headmaster S/oShri Shobhit RamSahu Govt. PrimarySchool Balodi Block-Magarload Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) NoharSingh Thakur Age about 46 year, Astt. Teacher S/o Shri Hem Singh Thakur Govt. PrimarySchool Dhourabhata Block-Magarload Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt.-Raipur (C.G.) Astt. Commissioner Triblewelfare Department Dhamtari, Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) Distt. Education OfRcer Dhamtari, Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) Contd..2.. )£ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH : BiLASPUR WRIT PETiTSON (S) N0.77 OF 2009 PETSTIONERS Roop Kumar Dhruw & Others RESPQNDENTS Gowri Versus State Govt. of Chhattisaarh & Others (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of incila) Singie Bench : Hora'bie Shrl Satish K. Agnlhotri, J. Present:- Shn Somkant Verma, eounsei for the petitioners. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, PaneS Lawyerfor the State» ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 13th day of Januan/, 2010) 1. With the consent of iearned counsei for the parties, the petition js heard finaily, 2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petltioners submlts that this petltion is squareiy covered by the decisjon of this Court passed on 6-2-2009 in W.P. (S) No.367 of 2009 (Uma Ambast vs. State of ChhaWsgarh & Others) and prays ttiat slmitar rellef may be granted in case ofthe.present petltioners ateo. 3. At this juncture, !earned counsei appearing for the State subml'te that in the event the petltloners submit a detaiied representation the same shali be considered and decided, in accordance wlth law andl In view of the dectsion of this Court rendered in Ums Ambasi (supra), subject to verification of facts. 4. In vlew of foregoing, accordlng to the ieamed counsel appearing for the petltloners nothJng sumves in thls petltion for adjydication. Accordingiy, the writ petition is dlsposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge 5. 1