IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2008 / 28TH JYAISHTA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 3859 of 2008() ----------------------------- CRMP.1610/2008 of D.C. & SESSIONS COURT,KOLLAM CRIME NO.467/2008 OF KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION PETITONER : ACCUSED: ----------------- HARI LAL M., AGED 24, S/O. MOHAN BABU,HARI NIVAS, VIKAS NAGAR -76, PATTATHANAM P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE RESPONDENT: ------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERANAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI K.SIVAKUMAR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. HEMA, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A.No. 3859 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 18th day of June, 2008 O R D E R Application for anticipatory bail. 2. The alleged offences are under sections 143, 147, 148, 324, 326 read with section 34 IPC. Iron rod and sticks were used in the offences. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is totally innocent of the allegations made. He had given Rs.50,000/- to the defacto-complainant for obtaining visa. The defacto- complainant is engaged in arranging visa, but he failed to do so after getting the money. There were some complaints and some people were attacking the defacto-complainant but the petitioner is innocent, it is submitted. 4. This application is opposed. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is the 1st accused, who alone is identified. Name of the petitioner is mentioned in the First Information Statement itself. Other accused have to be identified and weapons used for the offences are to be recovered. I am satisfied that this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. Hence, the application is dismissed. K. HEMA, JUDGE. -2- mn.