IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN Present: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY A.S.No.2528 OF 1999 Between: The Land Acquisition Officer & Special Deputy Collector, IPT & Rlys., Khammam. … Appellant And: Bhukya Bikshalu … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY A.S. No.2528 OF 1999 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Gopal Reddy) This appeal is preferred by the State, represented by the Land Acquisition Officer-cum-Special Deputy Collector, IPT & Railways, Khammam, challenging the order of the Subordinate Judge, Sathupalli, passed in O.P.No.9 of 1992, dated 28-04-1995. 2. The value of the appeal is Rs.6,060/-. Having regard to involvement of trivial and insignificant amount, this appeal, in our considered opinion, ought not to have been preferred by the State. 3. It is represented by the learned Government Pleader for Appeals that along with O.P.No.9 of 1992 other O.Ps viz., O.P.Nos.5 to 8 and 10 to 12 of 1992 were also disposed of by the Court below by a common order dated 28-04-1995 and as against O.P.Nos.5, 10 and 12 of 1992, A.S.SR.No.12790 of 1996, A.S.No.161 of 1997 and A.S.No.1737 of 1998 respectively were preferred and the same were dismissed by this Court and for the remaining OPs, no appeals have been preferred by the Land Acquisition Officer. 4. In view of the same, we do not find any merit in the appeal. 5. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. This judgment, however, shall not operate as precedent for the purpose of determining the compensation in respect of other lands, if any, acquired even in the same village and shall not have any binding precedent value. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J. ____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J. Dated 30th March, 2010 Lrkm