1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 2^5^- OF 2004 PETITIONER vyy ^^:^k }>'^y' ^1^'9'>>' ^' ^' .-'•' ^"',^'' ..•••' ^^'>""^ 6ESPONDENTS vs 1^ L^...^C\.^. Smt. Sharda Kumare wife of Shri Satish Kumar Kumare, aged about 35 years, Assistant Teacher , Girls Pre-Middle School, Dondi District Durg (C.G.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan,Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Durg. 3. Smt. Nishi Sarva, Assistant Teacher, Girls Hostel, Amadala, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 SB 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ,f-^^ ^^ '^ ] "^^w^; |^^S|1^ ^^y XI-HC-22 '3'a? ^l<4td^l, ^Til^^Ko, fa^i^y. ^n^r'^T ^ich ^^[\ s^*ii<sn <iRa 4- ^ ^nWTT^RJcfr 3TT^T xra^R ^:.^...^.^.±•^ 200^ 'f^^T' ^TI^T "^TT^'Srf^T chl^t<n4lTl ^1^<A*^ fs(<1 <f^^l< ^STf^rH^T^T 03/08/2004: - Shri Prafulla Bharat, counsel fotjthe petitioner. Shri-V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Advoc^te General, with Shri U.N.S. Deo, G.A., Shri Yashwant Thakur, G.A., Shri Satish <| Sandeep Dubey, Panel Lawyers, for th| Applioation for urgent hearing i^ Heard. Learned counsel for the petition|er submits that the matter relates to transfer of the petitioner, He further submits thatj Having heard and considered 3upta, Dy-.G.A,, Shri Akhit Agrawal and-Shri ? State/respondents. allowed. br the present the petitioner may^be given an opportunity offiling the detailed repres^ntation before the Competent Authority ofthe respondents, which shalt be considere<|l on its own merits in accordance with law. he rival contentions, without expressing any opinion on the merits ofthe case, in th^ opinion ofthis Court ends ofjusticewould be served ifa direction is given to the petitj her grievance before the State/Compet copy ofthe petition and this order, withj made, the competent authority of th^ same on its own merits in accordancel ionerto make a detaited representation raising :ent Authority of the respondents along with a n ten days, and on such representation being respondents shatl consider and decide the with law as earty as possible, preferabty within sixweeks from the datepf receipt of th^ representation. Ifany contravention of policy or guidelines is brought to the notice, tljie same be considered on its own merits. Learned counsel for the peti|:ibner prays that after the decision of the representation, if any grievance of the the remedy .avaitabte under the taw. tt| available under the taw. With the aforesaid obsen/ationsl Consequently, M.W.P.,-ifany, ^tands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Copy to State counsel for compj Detitioner remains ?he may be altowed to avaii is open to the petitioner to/avait the remedy this petition stands disposed of. iance. ^^y^^Olol^ S^*- *^^?{'~^>^ 8?Y8^ r ^ Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge |Tft^'?H^'