vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.2 OF 2003 TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.2 OF 2003 TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.2 OF 2003 IN IN IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.381 OF 200 TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.381 OF 200 TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.381 OF 2002 Ashok Kumar Agarwal & anr. ... Plaintiffs V/s. Vijay S. Agarwal ... Defendant Mr.S.V. Doijode a/w Ms.M. Iyer for Plaintiffs Ms.Manisha Virkhare i/b Vigil Juris for Defendant CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED: JANUARY 29, 2009 JANUARY 29, 2009 JANUARY 29, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Parties submit that the only objection in the matter is that they do not trust each other. The learned advocate for the defendant, therefore, submits that the plaintiffs should not be allowed to administer the estate of their deceased father and that some independent person be appointed to administer the estate of the deceased immediately upon the letters of administration being issued. The Prothonotary and Senior Master shall appoint any Officer of this Court within one week from today to administer the estate of the deceased immediately upon the letters of administration being issued. 2. In view thereof, the Testamentary Suit is : 2 : allowed in the aforesaid terms. There will be no order as to costs. 3. Needless to add that this order will not prejudice the rights and contentions of the parties in any manner whatsoever. (S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)