IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2010 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 9906 of 2010(K) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A. PARAMESWARAN PILLAI, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O. LATE SARASWATHI AMMA, AIKKARA VEEDU PARIPPU P.O., KOTTAYAM – 686 001. BY ADV. SRI.H.B.SHENOY SRI.B.ASHOK SHENOY SMT.LAKSHMI B.SHENOY SRI.ABU MATHEW SRI.SOBHAN GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KOTTAYAM 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, AYAMANAM VILLAGE, AYAMANAM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: jma T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.9906 of 2010 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the owner in possession of 8 cents of land comprised in Survey No.149/9 in Block No.7 of Ayamanam Village in Kottayam District. The property was originally held on lease by petitioner's father, late Ayyappa Menon from its then title owner, Late Gopala Pillai. On the date of the Petitioner's father, late Ayyappa Menon, the said landed property devolved on petitioner and his mother, late Saraswathi Amma. Title owner of the land, namely, Gopala Pillai also died on 25/10/1975. 2. The claim of the petitioner and her mother was allowed in their favour as per Ext.P1 order by the Land Tribunal. The same will be accepted by the Civil Court as per Ext.P2. As against the Ext.P2 judgment, an appeal as A.S.No.23 of 1991 was filed against the same. The decree of the Trial Court is also confirmed. 3. Thereafter, the matter between the parties have been settled by the Lok Adalath as per Ext.P5 by the petitioner paying an amount of Rupees one lakh. The petitioner has complied with the same and now what is sought for is for mutation under the W.P.(C)No.9906 of 2010 2 Transfer of Registry Rules. Ext.P7 is the copy of the application. It is pointed out that Ext.P7 even though was forwarded by the first respondent to the second respondent for report, and even after the receipt of report the application is still pending as file G2-9273/09 in the first respondent's office. The petitioner seeks for a direction to the first respondent to take a decision on the same. 4. There will be a direction to the first respondent to take a decision on Ext.P7 application for transfer of registry pending as File No.G2-9273/09 after notice to the petitioner and any other necessary parties within a period of two months from the receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE skj