1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2904 OF 2006 IN REVIEW PETITION (LODG.) NO.25 OF 2006 IN APPEAL NO.1136 OF 1996 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1825 OF 1996 Madhukar Rangnath Kulkarni ..Petitioner. Vs. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and others ..Respondents. ....... Ms Gayatri Singh with Ms Seema Chopda for the Petitioner. Mr. V.Y. Sanglikar for Respondent No.1. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. 27th January, 2010. P.C. : The Motion seeks the condonation of delay in filing a Review Petition against a judgment of this Court dated 23rd September, 2004. The Petitioner has averred that his advocate was absent before the Court on 23rd September, 2004 when the appeal was heard and disposed of on merits. The Petitioner has, by way of a justification for the delay, made reference to his medical condition and has stated that after coming to know about the order he had applied for a certified copy. On receipt of the certified copy, this Court 2 was moved. Having heard the learned counsel, we have considered it appropriate in the interests of justice to condone the delay of 673 days in taking out the Notice of Motion. Sufficient cause has been shown. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)