1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 797 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 797 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 797 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 645 OF 2008 Santosh Eaknath Langde & Ors. ...Appellants (Org. Accused) Versus The State of Maharashtra (Through Igatpuri Police Station). ...Respondent Mr. R.D.Deshmukh for the appellants. Mrs. Usha Kejriwal, APP, for the State. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & A.A.SAYED,JJ. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & A.A.SAYED,JJ. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & A.A.SAYED,JJ. DATED DATED DATED: 7th October, 2008. 7th October, 2008. 7th October, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellants and the learned APP for the State. 2. The learned Counsel for the appellants-accused has pressed for bail for all the accused on two grounds. Firstly, he has submitted that the accused are poor persons and secondly, that there is no one in their families to earn. Both these grounds cannot be of any 2 use to the appellants-accused. 3. We have gone through the record and the Judgment. We find that there were three eye-witnesses. The learned Counsel has not pointed out anything to disbelieve them and/or the incredibility of their testimony and, therefore, we find that the conviction is just and proper. Apart from that, the learned Counsel for the appellants-accused has submitted that the accused No.1 was not granted bail. Accused Nos. 2 to 4 were granted bail during trial. However, we find that there is sufficient evidence against all the accused and, therefore, all the accused are not entitled for bail. 4. The Application for bail is hereby rejected. (A.A.SAYED,J.) (S.B.MHASE,J.) (A.A.SAYED,J.) (S.B.MHASE,J.) (A.A.SAYED,J.) (S.B.MHASE,J.)