/ 5 114 td. silCid CcsUU (V aiLa 1 . aL usas uia Zd JX CF JUfl 1998 Y Itl.JLbflCs .ctrn duf ntIfl0M £Ga.2981/1993 C/bE 2198/1993 C/bE 6025/1993 C/n 26?2/1993 / 1. Vo1ckaUara Sangha A soatety regd. urbier the öoajeties Registra tion Act, KJ. Road tV.Puram, $‘lorea4 reptd. by its General 8eeetcy. .... Petitiozsr. (ày *ri Gangireddy, Adv.) ‘a 1. £hirector of CoJS giate £duoation, Palace Road Bangalorese 1. 2. Yenkappagowda K. majcr Lecturer in Kannada Kunmpu First Gr. .oflege Chennapatna, W.lore is1. trishnamurttay V. major, Lecturer in History LL.a. Goflege, Malleshwaram iIangalore. . amt. Qzana, major First .I)iqn. aest. Jasari lidyaniketana College, angalore. S 5. Puttaswamy P.M. maja” attender, 1.11. Puram 4rts Cc cmmeroe College, V.LPuram Bangalore.4. . . C.. o. erirea..aa, major Leon, tefl 1 4Jd(ite dil i..4iuge, Usage re. .... lay era b. U4ayasaanKar m Ca’ hi. ar.. jn Itaja ha%? DCtnJla, aLt. itt itt) wa. 2198/1994 Oa. m.—wl: ofl 11. Oeiaraju ‘/o .ari Karigowiat, 3, jrs. LA djffl. ant. f 1. kgX Ucliege of oaLenoe A.’. itoad., j3aflgaj.oreeL. .... Pet±tioncr. eny brS b. Vaaanthmkumr, * 1 aW. 1. £114) j)iflctor of Collegiate ajtion in £srnataa ialasoe float, Wlotbej. LyJs Yaaa,embnt of foflbligca baflgfla, D.y atj JeneraL eeeetmrj, aat. Aog 1. 1. 2uram, batngalcreek. 3. ofl Wieflora tin, fasavi liiflafls .siketana i(,flbge asatofla.Uii •..• Se Lby niL • lMdyaanantar, ‘r hi. en san1$ea1y, nat. Ca’ 4 w.t .s4o. 602g/ 1993 eat. o. tasaah.. i)/ i 1*. .atyaraa7bna .3 716. AatLlrrr inasatzy datxc,nai C.c.Uege. Jejan gar brancgi, Uangai.oreefa. .... ret.tlcner. b7 & S fasegtdkt4at, ait.) i ne )irector of Collegiate c1ucation Karnataan oesnadfi goad, &Iore1, 2 The Management of toe Nation ucation bocety of Karnataka (it) its B0 nor ary Se cretar y Basavariagucil, B’ lore _k 1 3 ri O.k. Krihnappa iecturer in ru story Acharya First ade women’s oliege, dauribiuanur, under transfer to iationll College i3asaranagudi, B’lore., (oy ri UtlayasflaLLKar, uAt for ki. on Shetty c dagie sh/S for rt3) on C. JayapraKash o/o M,G, Cnandrasear 39 yrs. Faa, Seahadri pam College, b’iore2O, (by on fasanthaicumar, Au.) , Toe üirecter of oliegiate bducation in Karnctaan Palace toaci, b’lore2, , inc Sesnadnipuram kaucational Trust () by its Geral uretary, oeshaipuram College Bldgs. b’lore-20, . . 4.. These W .?s. are flied unuer art. 226 of tta Constitution of india, preying to set aside the order mae by At dated 21.12.1992, etc. These hiPs. coming on for Learing this day, the Court aad•tke folloidngs Petitioner in w.P.298I/1993 is a Regis tered *ociety registered under the provisions of Larnataica óoateties Registration Act. Petitioner-SocIety is running Arts, Commerce, ScIence, Medical and &ngineering Coll*ges, which is a private institution aria affiliated to Sangalore University and is getting granta from the State Governs.nt$p proviaed under the Grant-in-aid Code. 2. Petitioner in 11.1.2198/1993 was working as Second Division Assistant 3* the Y.Y.Puras UoUege of Science. Petitioner in W.P.6025/1993 was workins as Lecturer in History in the National College, Bangalore. Petitioner in 11.1.267411993 was workirg as First àivision Assistant in the deshadri puram College, Bangalore. jA 4-. 0.)s. 3, ret tione’ ware conotmined to aproath twi Court DCiflb aggrieves o tn orders made o trio arector of Collegiate u ctlon uatd 21.12.99i my ta aaa impugned order, trr A)s.recbor o iigiate Ihdijoation yes trar fred SOffie C tot; arturers from the coflege’ under tn ontrol of tne petitioner-society tt4- 2981/19)3 a e198/1993) aria petitioners it W,2, 60i,/ 993 an 2b/ /1993 to earioue other colic gsa It, he i ipu 0 tad order is questioned by toe petitioners on the olS ground that toe .aictor of Collegiate aacatton has no corn peten to pass tne aforasard or 4 0 lfe (sower inent of aarnataaa by in oraer in nc, i+& CrC 7q dateu . jD1981 a a i sued wirtain guidelines in h attes o appointrnnts, transfers, eto,, conseluon upon tot; introanction of toe oirect pmert of toe a lry scutr w,e,f,i,iO, 19??’ I s far tie tier La s re c Je c there are to clersos ifl t: 1 e sorer.nent Crer Ciansa 1 o’ toe uoarrjw;nt orcer speacs of ranofo s r Cr Le sara rara 0 eme aid ‘Ian / soeaes of transfers from the cnuJge under the control of one management to another , , 6, , college uaer the administration of a different management. The said clause is relevant for the purpo• e of thi. s case, T here fore, it is extracted and it reads asjnder; H?, gj.er:.: 1. whenever tnert is a fall in toe won load, rendering an employee surplus in a doliege or a surpls; member of Pards terial staff, toe iiirector snali have the poir to transfer anon surplus employees to another college where there are vanncles and such transfers shall be accep teddy the concerneu Management. Provided the emplq::e so tranb ferred is liable for retransfer to the parent institution whe ever tnere is sufficient work or a vacancy, g, Ir1e 4.rector snaIl have power to transfer on request of an emplOyee 01 a college to ano ther such college under the control of Director of Collegiate sgiuatin in cases of hardship sub.ject to availability of worMicai/vacancy, provided both the managements pass a resolution agreeing to such a transfer, The transferre employee shall oe toe 1iorost in that cadre as on toe date of: transfer,” an analysis of toe aforecaic clause would clearly indicate that/the officer of the State Governmentin the instant case the A*ector ‘4, •. 7.. of Coils giate tducation,i a of the view that there is a fall in the inrk load rendering an employee stuplus in the institution or a surplus member of Ministerial staff, he shail have tue point to transfer such an employee to another collage, where there are vacancies, it is also made cleat in the subeclause (i) of clause 7 tnat under such cLrctastances, the management shall accept the transferred employee. Proviso appealed to sub-clause gives an indication that the transferred employee can be re transferred to the partint institution whi ever tuere is a sufficient waric in the institution or a vacancy arises. Sub-clause (2) of clause 7 envisages that the Alice ctor has tne power to transfer both teaching and non-teaching staff frcm one college to another coilege on a request ade by the employee concersfl. Before such transfers could be made, it is made abundant ly clear that both the managements should . 8, • pasa a rabolut 01 agreeing for trarafer, Under subt lauac 2) ,tha die ‘tor on hia 0 canrot transfer a person or a rcqua t macic 0 t cmployee, he soou nusaaily o tin tie couant f the managements of both the instltatt’i agreeing f r ucn a tranofer, ot erwie the retor wi 1 not be I a poe - tior to effc tra afar I an aip oyea of a ‘ £ age to anotar colLege or a request trade bj him, i a is all what a b-tIau,ses(1) and 2, 0 (emcee of e overumert Or e would say. 6, he ping in ‘r w tre ro id no str - ctisr 0 1au - / of t a iwr tm-nt rde 4 att 0 d .1 .1981, let inc now u,e t 0 te fact aituation i the praser case, 1. Peti ionerfr in ti-ass wr petst -‘r were w ir Cc0I in a tai , act r r i r t ait a a— twe I er t C ‘is J a w c is aju y un 0 I le(enaa 5t at .1, Git cola * a j , .9.. irAg to the learned Counsels for the petitioners, this transfer order could not have been mane ry tne responcientautnoricies without the cons sent or without aeeirsg for such transfer, 8. Per contra, Sri Udayashar:i. i, learned haul, Advocate justifies the impugned draer on t’n : grounds, Firstly, by virtue of clause 7 of the Government Or der dated 31.10.81, the StaW Government and its officer has the power to transfer ootn teaching staff as well as norvtaacning staff from one collage to the otcer college for the reasofti enumerates in tne clause 2 itself, oconddy, flC Submits tnat since the State Government is ayine- the sala -ries of all the teacdir anJ nonteacnng staff of the college, the itate Government is entlUed to transfer an employee of a college fnr one college to other college. 9. 1n so far as the second contention of tne learned will, Govt. advocate is concerned, it is difficult to accept tne same 4 for tna reasoneven tflcnign the State r,orrernnlent pays tne sclLthos of tne tcachars/non-teacrdng staff memusr, they still contiruo to be under tic crr’troi eS ttc’ minagemelt. tni_ Court 1l. (‘tile LsI i.e 4J. (.totJsltbati d Ldt najtt. reportai at ii$ 1435 .‘ 39?9 a3 Ite’&S to bsee tat tzaer Ls n rela tiOflali r of ma$td” an sctuit oetwe..n tue teaoi tt rstita ibi 3atlOflaJ. ,t tge t2ans ate I or un-ailel arl.a tn, xonrn.aent. 10. .DLl t Ca 60 the etate o e fluent JnijS tvAe saLty to tnen teacners Jinsztij. it c.rnot b s&lthist t’ayaan ast.r ar.d sefdnt n1tiont4p witn tbe teachers. Lu that lej o the m.ttter, tie SUOflb oi of tna iessrte.i aflL. Govt. adyroate for the atatq tion’nnnt oerwl b an Ji. 11 Furtcc, .Zt is &ftaa to a 3tain tat msugriai orjers male oy toe Mreetcr o’ o]..Le4a Juc.tirn. Gflue7 s edgei w..th onitLatra’ for tn- St.te ‘aoqe i. merit to tri s”r i empinqet in a college to tne trsr xJ.eje .t4fla 0 CI 4 ne ,uzferdnt minqucint tetwr• lag.,- .i.ag”e Ui a 7 ma 1 caq Lt n c.c.ar ..nao t ie Jjre.tor O a..1 tratfer an mj o;ee proctWi trw cot- 11 jjticns eijjrerate t iertn are sitisfid, rst aria ‘ remest, th’ t)irect r of ‘oa1e- giate t LOn a call come to tne orcl sion that tnsre is a fall in the woric ba’ rerlderana a employee surplus in toe coliege r a surpla memoer iini terial staf C in osi. g—, ioa act u a fur wr Ou’ue at n oy tii trial tlee are racaricie- ii the otner cofle. t as orC; solar these two circwnstdncts oy invoalog su—dasse cI) of ojause 2 of trw doierrniwnt uner, toe Jirector I tlleglaa at 1 ti ‘a transfer aotn t daring sta C ant non-teaciing staff meaor of an insttution, in toe Iristajit case, it is nertrrer in toe impugned order nor toe ótate ucierament flas fiiei it objections tatemeit .o indicate that etiti one-s in trese .it petiti is wet transfa ad on ground tnat there is fall In tne woca load renlering trw teacners,!Ieoturers surplus in a particular coiiege n toe aosena of cii a rw I on, a4 trer in tne impugne grin sin r ir in e 4 JriLr arne b tre re- or, t it aifC ul to Sai that tr Jrect has a et , .12., cise s powers wop3rly under suo-clase (1 — of c&ase 7 of tn oieraannt orier. 12. £flC prolso appwnuel to suo-oause cu of clause I also makes It clear that a person an ow re_trarisferrea to the fare it institution wnenever there is suffciant ra load or a iacancy. Pals gives a ciesr iflulea U n that an arde’ aa 1 ° under san-clause Ci of cIase 7 iS oray a temporary arrar.ga’Fent witn an option for tho tranferrec employee t OO flacK to parent institution hnnerr there is sufficient wor baa in tfi institu tion, nfl these aspCccs of the matter S na owen taken into ‘oisideration by the Jirector os boflegiate aaucation cefore pass ing tow ipugnC4 a’aers, bince tnw woe nas no oeei aone by tar rector of Goliegiate &cucation, it is alffilt to sustaln toe craers maae by him. 13. ChiLi-clause cc! oX ciause 7 can ne ii owef Dy he rector of Goltsgifl aduca tion ir a aifferent c aiC alt getnr. lbs Jirector can resort to tar afor4asaii G A p osi n ori” if a re 1 ues is made b an employee of the collee for a transfer from one colts ge to tne otner college ren nerd, toe ‘ owision itsf mea a condition tnat un a tranef could it’ected tne mngements of ooth the institutions pass resoiutin agreeing for suen transfer. r managementc for any reason does not agree for sues a transfer cia a ‘edd’t is maue by ne employ woncing in tne insti ution, he Jirector, in my flsw, has no power whatsoewer to transfer Lie employee sian at its reaest Ia, bince tne i’ector in the impu’nel order his not tated nor in tne note sheet tnat toy nave matntainedtnat trw transfers nan oeer cone oesaae of a flli in trw woLc load renusri a emp ayee surplc n a f ‘tic dar co iSg, t C impugne 1 0 ers ‘aRQOt 0€ sstaifld1, nccrdingiy, tcuy are reanirei to oe set asiac by thts court, I , a bad. f ic ;o o de a s mates mt cmar tnat employes t”anferred from one college to othe’ college snoula oc t e j n -r most in te caite in tna coii°g . ltf. . Cc? tLt. ‘t VJ ihis fl only iflatranster 1$ male on a renuest ma 4 e by the employee ani if a trafer is made tinier ouc-clause 1) of clause , the employee cannot ba the juuior most in tnat cadre, ho jar, tne uirector in tue a der maces it oolous that the tranferd employee wii oe the uni moat in tnet care in tne tr&sferred collag, en on tact score, the impu&nei oruer waae cy the ‘lrector of cloilegiate .t3ation Sated cl.1€ll9jc reqair a to cc set aslid o ths dourt, 16. For tao reasons statea, the impugnel order male by tie ‘lirector of doligIate &iuca- tim datCI a ,12.19 is Ct aide, ‘lowe x, icwaty s reserfli to tao director of clla site amacatlon to effect trar 1 sferb if P so uczes by ii,o ‘ us-lause “ ) of caau C ? of tne Goierert order iteu ,jO, 1i only after complyIng witn ala the anditiuns enurat u a th a o a iii j, a, • £ di I tress a It peiti a c- t 0 C imatey after tao orders are lsuei y tr I )e director of Collegiate ducation had approach ed tnis Court and hal octained an InterIm order of stay 4 But si w.P.6o25/1993, cnn before the 1.nterim orders coald be imp3a meat eä by tne respondents, the transferred employee rtL &LUwt4 S nad ztaed Sn° aria she jOiflOd as a Lecturer in the transferred coilege I& In that new of the matter, in so far as petitioners in the otner writ petition are concerned, to continue to be in the college in which they are worsing as on• subject. to tne further orders that nj. t DC made ny the Jirector of Collegiate aducatiori, keepirt. in ;iow subciause Ci) of Clause 7 of the Gonrn cent order and also the obserwations of this Court in these it petitions. 194 etitioner in :.. 86025/1993 is at ilcerty to appr oach the respon.dants with a reqcest to transfer her to the parent instItu tion. If such ar equest iS made to the Lirector of Collegiate £ducation, the Uirecta shall take the xeQuest into consideration and . I 5 , paso appropriate orlers aS proilaei unaer so clau a çf use c, ti uvrcwiSorsr, eQ. wit0 toese ousa,ation aOl darec or, these writ pttLcns re aisposea of. Qruerei a crrJ) rgiy. sdI JUDGE a M QJ 19051 9jR