IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1090 of 2008 SURESH NAT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 06.05.2008 Heardboth sides. This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail.The petitioner was made an accused in a case instituted under sections 341,323,324,307, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that under order dated 14.10.2006 he was granted bail on merit. The petitioner continued to appear before the court and thereafter defaulted in appearing. It further appears that under order dated 11.12.1997 bail bonds of the petitioner were cancelled. It has further been submitted that the petitioner suo motu surrendered on 08.04.2006 and since then he is in custody. The petitioner has made statements in the bail application to explain the reason for default in appearing before the Court . Having considered the fact that the petitioner already remained in custody for nearly two years, this Court is inclined to enlarge him on bail. In the facts and circumstances, let petitioner namely, Suresh Nat be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge Fast Track Court No.4, Bhojpur at Arra in connection with Jagdishpur P.S.Case No.49 of 1995, Session Trial No.183 of 2006 subject to the condition that one of the bailers should be the 2 own family member of the petitioner. The petitioner shall appear before the learned Court below on each and every date(s) so fixed in the case unless and until his appearance in Court is dispensed with for sufficiently good reasons by the learned trial Court. In case of default the trial Court is at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and secure his arrest. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)