IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10126 of 2010 1. RAM LAKHAN YADAV S/O LATE DASA YADAV R/O KARIYADPUR, P.S.- FATEHPUR, DISTT.- GAYA, ELECTED MUKHIYA OF GRAM PANCHAYAT OF JAGGARNATHPUR, BLOCK- TANKUPPA, DISTT.- GAYA 2. KISHORE KUMAR S/O LATE DWARIKA LAL R/O GUGHARI TAR, P.S.- CIVIL LINES, DISTT.- GAYA, PANCHAYAT SEVAK CUM MEMBER EMPLOYMENT COMMITTEE OF GRAM PANCHAYAT OF JAGANANNATHPUR, BLOCK- TANKKUPA, DISTT.- GAYA 3. UPENDRA SHARMA S/O LATE RAMDHIN THAKUR R/O VILLAGE + P.O.- CHOWAR, P.S.- WAZIRGANJ, DISTT.- GAYA, ELECTED MUKHIYA OF GRAM PANCHAYAT OF CHOWAR, BLOCK- TANKKUPA, DISTT.- GAYA ____ Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER- CUM-SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, GAYA 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, TANKUPA, DISTT.- GAYA 5. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, TANKUPA, GAYA 6. THE DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, GAYA 7. MUNNA KUMAR SINGH S/O KASHI SINGH R/O VILL.- NEURI, P.S.- BELAGANJ, DISTT.- GAYA 8. SANTOSH KUMAR SINHA S/O NAVAL KISHORE PRASAD VILL.- MANMADHO, P.O. CHOUR, P.S.- TANKUPA, DISTT.- GAYA 9. BRAJ BHUSAN PRASAD SINGH S/O PURAN SINGH R/O VILLAGE + P.O.- NEURI, P.S.- BELAGANJ, DISTT.- GAYA 10. GAURI SHANKAR PRASAD YADAV S/O SRI MURESHWAR PRASAD YADAV R/O VILLAGE + P.O.- BHASAPIPRA, P.S.- FATEHPUR, DISTT.- GAYA 11. PANKAJ PASWAN S/O SUCHIT PASWAN R/O VILL.- JAMHETA, P.O. + P.S.- FATEHPUR, DISTT.- GAYA 12. SUDARSHAN SHARMA S/O BALRAM SHARMA R/O VILL.- PARWALDIAH, P.O.- KARIYADPUR, DISTT.- GAYA 13. KUMARI ANITA W/O KAMLESH PRASAD R/O VILL.- MANMADHA, P.S.- CHOUR, P.S.- WAZIRGANJ, DISTT.- GAYA 14. NADRA KHATOON W/O MD. AFTAB ALAM R/O VILL.- MIYABIGHA, P.O.- KARIYADPUR, P.S.- FATHEPUR, DISTT.- GAYA 15. SATISH PRASAD S/O TALKESHWAR SHARMA R/O VILL.- MEN, VIA- PAIBIGHA, THANA- BELAGANJ, DISTT.- GAYA 2 16. SUMAN KUMARI D/O BACHCHAN KUMAR PANDEY R/O VILL.- CHOWAR, P.O.- CHOWAR, VIA- TARWAN, THANA- BAZIRGANJ (O.P.- TANKUPPA), DISTT.- GAYA _____ Respondents ----------- 02. 3.3.2011 Counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ application has become infructuous since the impugned order has already been quashed and the matter remanded back in another writ application. In view of the same the writ application is dismissed as having become infructuous. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)