IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH AUGUST 2011 / 26TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 29700 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SAREENA W/O.ABDUL RASHEED, KOTTATHARA NALAKATH VEEDU B.P.ANGADI POST, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.SUDHEER SMT.BINDU GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUR POLICE STATION, TIRUR, 3. MUJEEB RAHMAN, S/O.ABDUL KHADER THACHAPARAMBIL VEEDU, THALAKKAD AMSOM B.P.ANGADI POST, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ FOR R3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPIN DAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 29700 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 17th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. In this writ petition seeking directions to the police not to interfere with the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent, this court did not pass any interim order. This court attempted mediation of the issue under the aegis of the Kerala Mediation Centre. But, the above endeavour was not successful. 2. Today when the writ petition came up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. The writ petition will stand dismissed, however clarifying that if the civil dispute subsists between the petitioner and the party respondent, that dispute will have to be got settled through process of a competent civil court. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN,JUDGE. dpk