1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1927/2007 State of Raj. & Ors. vs Pala Ram & Anr. DATE OF ORDER:8.5.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Vimal Mathur, for the petitioners. Mr.Trilok Joshi, for the respondent no.1. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner -State is challenging the award dated 26th May, 2005 by which the respondent no.1's claim was allowed by the labour court, Sri Ganganagar in labour case no.1/2005. The respondent is in service since 1988 and is continuing till today. In substance he sought relief of regularization on the basis of length of his service, which has been allowed by the labouor court vide impugned award dated 26th May, 2005. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that labour court has committed serious error of law in allowing the claim of the respondent no.1 in view of the fact that respondent no.1 was not regularly selected candidate and he cannot get the regularization and other benefits. Learned counsel for the respondent no.1 submitted that the controversy stands settled by the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court delivered in the case of Secretary, State of 2 Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi reported in (2006) 4 SCC 1 which has been followed by this court in SBCWP No.5272/2005- Sheoratan Vs. Judge, Labour court & Ors, decided on 2.7.2008. Undisputedly,the respondent no.1 is in service since 1988 and discharging the duties then the labour court has not committed any error of law in issuing the direction as given in the award. Looking to the totality of the facts of the case, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-