IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14554 of 2008 1. Dharmendra Kumar Singh, son of Sri Tanki Lal Singh, Resident of Village and Post Parsando, P.S. Haweli Khragpur, District Munger. 2. Upendra Chaudhary, Son of Late Thakur Chaudhary, resident of Village and Post Parsando, P.S. Haweli Khragpur, District Munger. 3. Rajesh Kumar, Son of Sri Chakradhar Pandit, Resident of Village Baijalpur, Post Gowadda, P.S. Haweli Khragpur, District Munger….Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Secretary, Primary and Adult Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. District Magistrate, Munger. 4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Munger, District Munger. 5. District Superintendent of Education, District Munger. 6. Block Development Officer, Haweli Kharagpur, District Munger. 7. Block Education Extension Officer, Haweli Kharagpur, District Munger. 8. Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Raj, Baijalpur, P.O. Baijalpur, P.S. Haweli Kharagpur, District Munger. 9. Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Baijalpur, P.O. Baijalpur, P.S. Haweli Kharagpur, District Munger. 10. Headmaster, Primary School at Bhusichak, P.S. Haweli Kharagpur, District Munger. 11. Kundan Kumar, S/o Sudhir Pd. Singh, R/o Village Bhusichak, P.S. Haweli Kharagpur, District Munger…………………………………………………..Respondents ------- 4 16.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the State Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a common order was passed by the Collector, Deputy Development Commissioner and the District 2 Superintendent of Education, Munger on the basis of which engagements of six Shiksha Mitra were cancelled by the Panchayat Secretary. Out of six, three had moved this Court and under the orders of this Court, they moved the Appellate Authority. The Appellate Authority, by its order dated 24.10.2011 as contained in Annexure-11 with the supplementary affidavit filed today, has found the orders illegal and without jurisdiction and, therefore, has set aside the same and has directed the three appellants to be restored in service. He submits that since findings of the Appellate Authority apply to the whole impugned order, the same is applicable in the case of petitioners also. On perusal of the order of the Appellate Authority it appears that he has found the entire order of the State authorities as not in accordance with law. In the circumstances, obviously, the said findings are in favour of the petitioners also and, therefore, it is held that the order of the Appellate Authority shall be applicable in the case of petitioners also 3 in the manner as it is applicable in the case of three appellants before the Appellate Authority. This writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)