IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23360 of 2010 SANJAY KAMAT @ SANJAY KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05. 09.12.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the informant is also present. Torture for demand of dowry is the allegation is denied on the ground that there was no dowry or gift at the occasion of marriage, some gift is shown at the time of ‘Duragman’ and thereafter demand came in appearance. Specific submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is that no torture was caused nor she was ever assaulted. She is not ready to reside with this petitioner. Further it is said that to justify her act and to pressurize upon the petitioner, this case is lodged, may not be taken for refusal of anticipatory bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Complaint Case No.563C/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)