CRLR No.131/06 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for the revisionist. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Mr. S.C. Tyagi, Advocate for respondent no.2. Learned counsel for both the parties have fairly submitted that the instant revision had been preferred against the order-dated 11.7.2006 passed by the Additional Family Judge, Roorkee in Misc. Case No.11/2006, which was an interim maintenance order. It was further submitted by them that now the said case has finally been decided and hence the revision has now become infructuous and may be dismissed as such. In view of the above-said submissions, the instant revision is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Interim order dated 4.8.2006 is vacated. (D.V., J.) 13.07.2010 Rajeev Dang