IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. No. 6879 of 2009. Decided on: 07.07.2010. Balak Ram and others. …Petitioners. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate vice Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. None for respondents No. 4 & 5. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): It is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties that the present lis is covered by the principle laid down in the judgment dated 10th April, 2009, rendered by this Court in Dila Ram & Ors. versus State of H.P. and Ors., CWP(T) No. 4249 of 2008. 2. Consequently, the respondents are directed to do the needful qua the petitioner also as per the operative portion of the judgment dated 10th April, 2009 within a period of four weeks from date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 07, 2010. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?No.