THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.8430 of 2011 ORDER: The case in the lower Court is of the year 2004. Previously, the petitioner/accused filed petition for sending the disputed document to forensic expert for determination of age of the ink. The said petition was favourably considered by the lower Court and the document was sent to Forensic expert. The expert returned the document stating that age of the ink in the disputed document could not be determined. 2. Now, the petitioner/accused has come up with this petition under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to recall C.W.1 by name Shankar Rao, for the purpose of obtaining specimen writings and to send the same for expert opinion. The case was pending in the lower Court for a period of one year because of pendency of the document with Forensic expert for determination of age of the ink. Now, after the petitioner’s efforts became futile in that regard, the petitioner has come up with the present petition. The witness Shankar Rao was already examined. Nothing prevented the petitioner to obtain his specimen writings when he was already in box. At the fag end of the proceedings in the lower Court, the petitioner is coming up with one petition or the other to stall disposal of seven year old case. I do not find any merits as well as bonafides in the petition filed by the petitioner in the lower Court under Section 311 Cr.P.C. The lower Court rightly declined to entertain the petition. There are no grounds in this revision petition to interfere with the said order passed by the lower Court. 3. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. The lower Court is directed to dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible and preferably within six weeks of receipt of this order. ______________________________ JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU Dt:15.09.2011 ysk THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.8430 of 2011 Dt:15.09.2011 ysk