IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15689 of 2008 MD.ISAQUE & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4. 15.9.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State as well as the complainant. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.1346/06 for the alleged offences registered under section 498A and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the allegation of demand is general in nature and there is no specific allegation against these petitioners. The allegation of causing burn injury is absolutely incorrect. There is nothing on the record in an inquiry under section 202 of the Cr.P.C. As such, cognizance was taken for the aforesaid offences only. The learned counsel for the complainant has appeared pursuant to the notice and filed Vaklatnama and submits that all the petitioners are responsible for demand of dowry. The learned APP appearing for the State submits that the demand is against all the petitioners. Considering the above, it is directed that petitioners no.1 to 7, namely, Md. Isaque, Md. Hamida Khatoon, Md. Nasir, Md. Basir, Md. Alauddin, Samina Khatoon and Nisha Khatoon @ Anisha Khatoon, respectively, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No.1346/06, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of 2 Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)