IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.19787 of 2011 Date of Decision.20.10.2011 Manjeet Singh, Contrator s/o Bakshish Singh, resident of 290/5, MC Colony, Sirsa District Sirsa .....Petitioner Versus Hafed, Sector 4, Panchkula, through its Managing Director and another .....Respondents Present: Mr. J.S. Thind, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the writ petition is to be treated as representation and appropriate decision is taken by respondent No.2 regarding payment of outstanding amount payable to the petitioner. The respondents shall consider the demand made through the representation within a period of two months and if the liability is admitted, the amount shall be forthwith released preferably within a period of one month from that date. 2. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE October 20, 2011 Pankaj*