1 uIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 983/2009 S.B. Criminal Misc. Stay Application No. 1487/2009 (Rameshwar Lal Versus State of Rajathan & Another) Date of Order :: 6th July, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Shri P.K. Bohra, counsel for the petitioner Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 9th June, 2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.2, Bhilwara, whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner against the order dated 20th February, 2009 passed by the trial court, whereby evidence of defendant-petitioner was closed, has been rejected. 3. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it will be in the interest of justice, to grant one more opportunity to the petitioner to lead his evidence. 2 4. I have considered his submission. I find from the order of court below that statement of accused was recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C. way back on 12th September, 2007 and thereafter the case was fixed for defence evidence on 21st September, 2007. Thereafter 9- 10 opportunities were granted to the petitioner, but evidence was not led. The revisional court has already examined the matter in detail. The second revision by the same person is barred under sub-section (3) of Section 397 Cr.P.C. Hence, this petition under the garb of second revision cannot be allowed and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. 5. Consequent upon the dismissal of misc. petition, the stay application, filed therewith, does not survive and the same also stands disposed of. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK