IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.14314 of 2008 Between: Smt. Bhukya Bujji W/o Ramulu r/o Marrigudem (V) Garla (M) Khammam district. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Panchayat Raj Wing, Khammam. 2 The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla parishath, Khammam. 3 The Mandal Parishath Development Officer (MPDO) Garla (M) at Garla, Khammam District. 4 Smt. Tejavatu Rupa Bai W/o T. Chilakababu mandal Parishath, MPPM Garla, Khammam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ or direction preferably writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in taking appropriate action against the 4th respondent with regard to misuse of funds and irregularities in the administration as mentioned in the representation dt 4-10-2007 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to initiate action as per law by disposing of the representation and pass such other or further orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KOWTURU VINAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following: Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRT} THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.14314 of 2008 ORDER: It is the case of the petitioner that though a representation dated 04.10.2007 was filed before the respondents 1 and 2, which was received by the respondents on 05.10.2007 the same has not been considered and disposed of. It is stated that making certain allegations against the 4th respondent the said representation was filed requesting the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate steps against the 4th respondent. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 04.10.2007, after giving reasonable opportunity of being heard to all the concerned. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 30.04.2009 Dsr .... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The District Collector, Panchayat Raj Wing, Khammam. 2 The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla parishath, Khammam. 3 The Mandal Parishath Development Officer (MPDO) Garla (M) at Garla, Khammam District. 4 2. 2CCs to 5. 2CD copies