"s IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUD1CATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION No./^'2-/2006 Smt. Tileshwari Korsia W/o Shri ^,.<^" Atma Ram Korsia aged about 27 .•-.''l'^n^*'*" years, R/o - Village Panchal Fadki, ...^••"" Block- Manpur, Distt. Rajnandgaon ... •'"'..-.ft^l -.\'1?--"" ^•^r^i^y'ti"' IL;'U') fWA'"' r^^ ,....•••" VERSUS 1. State of Chhatdsgarh Through - Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Manpur Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3. Head Master, Vaikalpik (Unnayan) Primary School, Eadki, Manpur Distt. Rajnandgaon PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC—78 sn^CTw R'ii'* ^r^TI^T'SFRN? .:^A: *ll*lCTl VhW»h 75Ef '*fwwji, ®Tii+i'i6,f<<<*iiyy,< ^^...^^.^J^.•WtlOO ^ Stf^T^I?^? (•iq(3«l<i4) ??aRR flftn an^r SB: Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker Shri Anup Shri Yashwant Smitha Ghai Shri Amrito Maju|ndar counsel for the petitioner. Singh Thakur Dy. AG and Smt. PL|forthe respondents No. 1 and 3. Dasjcounsel for respondent No.2. Case of the petitione| as Instructor in Panchaysjt Subsequently, after up-gra^l Ji under Sarva Shiksha pay scale of contract petitioner was terminatec< 22.2.2006 and it is the chailenge in this petition. saiB Contention of the filing of the present petitior), vide order dated 29.6.200p now the limited relief of thf salary for the period 22.2.: q)i<4^<iii 'RTR^f ^ is%t ^^K ^a.ifW an^l >t' is that initialiy she was appointed and Rural Welfare Department. gra^lation, she was appointed as Guru Aljihiyan sch'eme and was given the te^cher Grade III. Thereafter, the from service vide order dated termination order which is under cotinsel for the petitioner is that after , the petitioner has been reinstated passed by respondent No.2 and petitioneris in respect of grant of >to 29.6.2006. 2006 'sl"~:~-w^'^y ^ ^.»^^f ^ w'"~' XI-HC—7S sfli^i w ft'fH &»- _s_ ?iSn^fR^f sS»jjq} -3'r T^ •*ii<<r<-i<i, anl'M'Kc, factiyy Wfffw<ra» ••^200 aii^r'q!ra'(1p^^*T) diot Counsel for the petitiorter very low paid employe^ circumstances she is workinjg that the respondents have scheme and the salary for thj her by them. Lastly, he subnfits a suitable representation tc} direction for deciding the payment of salary for the submission of the counsel respondents, have no objectijon. ssime flor Accordingly, the respc the representation, if any, period of three weeks from accordance with law. 'WE(t?N)7T tTTR^f tf 'fet^ <^R^|< ^stfiman^l submits that the petitioner is a and under the compelling as Guru Ji. He further submits sufficient fund under the saicf aforesaid period can be given to its that the petitioner would make respondent No.2 and seeks a sympathetically and to make aforementioned period. To this the petitioner, counsel for the spohdent No.2 is directed to decide (nade by the petifioner within a ]the date of its receipt strictly in The petition is thus disfjiosed of in the afore-stated terms. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge