-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1739 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO.1739 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO.1739 OF 2004 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.493 OF 2007 APPEAL NO.493 OF 2007 APPEAL NO.493 OF 2007 Kokila Chandrakant Vora & Ors. ...Applicants vs. Bapurao Dodappa Tondale & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.T.D.Deshmukh h/f Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni for the Applicants Mr.Surel Shah for the Respondents CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : JANUARY 24, 2008. : JANUARY 24, 2008. : JANUARY 24, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Rule. The Advocate for the Respondents waives service. Taken up for hearing forthwith. Ad-interim order passed by this court is operating from 2nd November 2004. The Advocate for the Respondent has invited my attention to the order dated 9th November 2004 passed by this court by which ad-interim order was modified to some extent. 2. Appeal is already admitted for final hearing. Ad-interim relief deserves to be continued. However, it will be open for the Respondents to prefer necessary application to this court for seeking relief in terms of order dated 9th November 2004 as and when occasion arises. 3. Subject to what is observed above, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (c). -2- JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE