t, IN THB HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURB AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH MISC.APPEAL.No. ^^^ 72006 ) r RESPONDENTS APPELLANT : , Tabassum W/0. KaiyumKhan aged about 27 years, R/0. Babu Bhai (Father) (Phataka Wale) Gandhi Chowk, Jain Mandir Road, Panch Kandil Chowk Durg, Tehsil and Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS )L^ Kaiyum Khan S/0 Samser Khan, aged about 33 years, R/0. Qt.No. 1 D, Sadak 12, Sector 8 Bhilai Nagar, Tehsil and Distt. Durg (C.G.) Ku. Aaysa Khan, D/0. Kaiyum Khan aged about 334 years, (Three 85 quarter years) is minor through : Legal Gyardian Mother Tabassum, R/0. Babu Bhai (Phataka Wale) Gandhi Chowk, Jain Mandir Road, Panch Kandil Chowk Durg, Tehsil and Distt. Durg (C.G.) X3CL) OF ^g- FA^IILY MEMO OF APPEAL UNDER SECTION<417-OF GUARJMAN ANDWARDSACT 1890., Cc3u^r/£(-CT,/?04- ^ffi' v4fy ^ 2. L..-.-.—--— ^ HI6H COUftT OF CHHATTISeARH AT BILASPUft &IVISION BENCH: HON'BLE MR. I.M.QUbbUSI & HON'BLE MR. PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA. JJ. Appellant Respondents M.A. No 928/2006 Tabassum Vs Kaiyum an & others Present; Mr. S.K. ^uha, Advocate for the oppellant. ORbEft rOran (5th January, 2011) I.M. Quddusi. J; 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for ihe appellant states that the matter has been settled outside the Court and therefore the appellant does not wont to pressl+iisappeal. 3. In view of 1+ie above statement, the instoint appeal is dismissed as not pressed. 4. Consequently, M.C.P. No.1284/06 also stands disposed of. ftoshi Sd/- I.M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge