IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.5988 of 2010 Date of decision: 07.12.2010 Roshanbir Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Bhanot, Addl. A.G., Punjab, for respondent No.1. Mr. Anil Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 fairly states that no demolition shall be carried out during the pendency of the appeal before the Additional District Judge, Amritsar. He further states that status quo shall be maintained during the pendency of the appeal. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3, who are the contesting parties, present petition stands disposed of with the direction that parties shall maintain status quo during the pendency of the appeal. Appellate Court shall decide the appeal itself in accordance with law within four months from the date certified copy of this order is placed before the appellate Court. (Alok Singh) Judge December 07, 2010 R.S.