THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P. No. 4395 of 2010 O r d e r: This C.R.P. is directed against the order dated 27.07.2010, passed by the Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-XVII Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, Malkajgiri, dismissing the application in I.A. No. 1583 of 2010 in O.S. No. 736 of 2002 filed by the petitioner, praying to petitioner praying to condone the delay of 413 days in filing petition to restore the suit to file. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the order under revision. Though the petitioner contends that the Advocate engaged by him shifted to Delhi and that he is under the impression that the present suit is still pending, and that immediately on coming to know about the dismissal of the suit on 15.12.2006, he filed the present application, the fact remains, the petitioner filed another suit in O.S. No. 33 of 2001 on the file of the V Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, against the defendant therein, who is his neighbouring plot owner, engaging the very same counsel which he engaged in the present case. The said suit, admittedly, was decreed on 28.03.2007. This apart defendant No.7 died on 10.04.2006 and even though a memo to that effect was filed on 21.08.2008 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy, the petitioner has not taken any steps in that regard. However, having regard to the fact that the very same Advocate was representing the petitioner in the present suit and the suit in O.S. No. 33 of 2001, which was decreed on 28.03.2007 by the V Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, the Court disbelieved the contention of the petitioner that he has no knowledge of the dismissal of the suit and that he was still under the impression that the present suit is still pending, refused to condone the delay of 413 days in filing the present application, and more so when the petitioner failed the explain the each day’s delay properly, from the date of dismissal of the suit to till the date of filing the present application, and no exception can be taken thereto. For the foregoing reasons, this Court find no reason whatsoever to interfere with the order under revision in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The C.R.P. is devoid of merit, and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 8th October, 2010 KSR