IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 18112 of 2008 Between: 1 Raju Chinna Venkata Reddy S/o.Late Subbaiah Pakkirupalli(V) Kadapa District 2 Raju Konda Reddy S/o.Late Raju Subbaiah Pakkirupalli(V) Kadapa District 3 Raju Venkata Subb Reddy S/o.Raju Pedda Venkata Reddy Pakkirupalli(V) Kadapa District ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The State of A.P rep.by its District Collector Kadapa District 2 The Tahasildar Kadapa(M) Kadapa 3 Raju Rama Subba Reddy S/o.late Venkata Subba Reddy Pakkirupalli(V) Kadapa District 4 Raju Lakshmi Narayana Reddy S/o.late Venkata Subba Reddy Pakkirupalli(V) Kadapa District 5 Raju Bharath Krishna Reddy S/o.late Venkata Subba Reddy Pakkirupalli(V) Kadapa District 6 Raju Shathrugneswara Reddy S/o.late Venkata Subba Reddy Pakkirupalli(V) Kadapa District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the Notice in Ref No B/1399/2008 dt.22-07- 2008 issued by the 2nd respondent as arbitrary illegal lack of jurisdiction and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioners under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.R.REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: Aggrieved by the notice dated 22.07.2008 issued by the 2nd respondent – Tahsildar, Kadapa directing the petitioner to appear before him for an enquiry in respect of a dispute with regard to the land in Sy.No.908 of Chinna Chowk of Kadapa City, the petitioner has ﬁled this writ petition questioning the authority of the second respondent in issuing such a notice. Pursuant to the notice issued by this Court on 20.8.2008, the second respondent-Tahsildar, Kadapa Mandal, ﬁled an aﬃdavit stating that there is no statutory provision authorizing him to issue such a notice and tendered his unconditional apology. In view of the same, the writ petition is closed. N.V.RAMANA, J Dt.15.09.2008 va/msv