^ i>.; ~\ iAtTilt J»- s> PETmONER WRIT PETmON CS) No. 4667 of2008 W Saradu Ram Kashyap, Son of Shri Sampat Ram Kashyap, aged about 47 years, at preseiit working as a Upper Divisioa Teacher.Govt. Higher Secondary ichool, Kesharpal, Talisil Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) „ : VERSUS . \ : : 1. StateofChhattisgarh,Through:TheSecretary,Tribal Wetfare Departoieiit, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Director, Tribal Welfare Department,Raipur(C.G.) 3. Assistant Direetor, Tribal WeUare Department, Jagdalpur, DistrictBastar(C.G.) 4. Priacipal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Kesharpal, Distt.Bastaer(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjnON OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Asnihotri. J. RESPONDENTS Present: ShriVishnuKostita,Advocateforthepetitioner. Shri M.F.S. Bhatia, DeputyGovemmait Advocate fbr fhe State/ ^f.'Rfispbndents..''. .; :~:/ •'.•, :::^ ,.,.: :.' , • . ,, : CHRAL<MU>ER (Passedon25B'dayof.August,20085 ' 1. Withthe consent offhe parties, the matter is taken up forhearing finally. 2. Leamed counsei appearmg for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press fhis petition ori merits at tliis stage. However- fhe respondent- aufhorities may be directed to considar and decide fhe pending representation dated 11.08.2008 (Annexure P/6), in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. 3. Shri Bhatia, leamed Deputy Govemment Advocate fbr the State/resppndents submits that there is no reason asto why the representation ofthe petitioner, as stated above should not be considered expeditiously. SUri Bhatia submits that the above-stated representation shall be considered aad deeided by fhe concemed authority, in accQrdance with law, on its own merits, witfiin a period oftwo weeks fipm flie date ofreeeipt ofa copv.ofthis order, Shri Bhatia fiiriher submits that no coercive steps shall be takeii, tillfhe disppsal ofthe representation. 4. I hope and trust that the State Govemment shall examine the representation objectively m accordance wifh law and guidelines, issued by the Govemment, timetotime. 5. In view offoregoing, the petition staods disposed of. No order asto costs. 6. Consequently, I.A. No. 1, applieationfor stay/interim relief,stands disposed p£ : • : • . • r';;:"" SdA ,.::.. : i; i SatishK.Agiuiilotri i ::i j~^_^'Judge'r - [, y'" !>:]'!ili-^|i|lii]iii-i»tij''ffl