1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No.4476 of 2006 Shree Salasar Balaji Prachar Mandal Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. Respondents With Writ Petition No.4477 of 2006 Ms.Hemlata R. Trailokya Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. Respondents Mr.Shriniwas Kamble with Mr.Rajiv Gupta for petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP for resp.no.1. Mr.N.N.Amin for resp.no.2. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & J.H.BHATIA,JJ. December 06, 2006. P.C. . The learned counsel for the respondent - Bank states that the proceedings instituted before the Collector and the District Magistrate under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 have been finalised and orders have been passed on 5th June 2006. The said orders are appealable orders under the Securitisation Act and, therefore, the petitioners will have to take steps to challenge the said orders by way of appeals. 2 . When a statutory remedy of appeal is available, there is no reason why we should entertain these petitions and, therefore, the petitions are disposed off by relegating the petitioners to the remedy of appeal. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)