fe5-f''^ ^6'}^^ ' t^^fnr^<-^'' ..-•-^ \i.^i '"r \ ^ \ .^7-'''' ^^^^f^.^-1-""" •siasff w^y ,->.«* - "^-A. IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. ^^ /2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTSA, »,.l1 2] 3] ^ Vedprakash Choure, S/o. Hridaya Ram Choure, aged about 49 years, Sub- Engineer, Rural Engineering Services, Office of Chief Executive Officer, Gunderdehi, District Durg (G.G.) .VERSUSJ Jl State of Chhattisgarh, through: Principal Secretary, Panchayat & Gramin Vikas Vibhag,, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) (•Zila Panchayat), Durg, DistrictDurg,(C.G.) . -. Chief Exeeutive Offieer, Janpad Panchayat, Gunderdehi, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA fS '^ 3D^l ^il !<(-iicb 'WT 3H^?T stat(N> A «.J- 's^ '^wwi, ®TiiI<<!®,fs|<riiy^< M.&...U^>.t^..z:^ sn^i'T^? ( TOTWSftgan^i SB : HON'BLEMR. JU8TICB PRltOtKBR DIWAKBR 27.09.2010 counlsel Shri Manoj Paranjape, Shri Praveen Das, Dy. G.A. Challenge in the present 24,11.2009 passed by the respon< from the post of Sub-engineer. The naain contention of th] present petltion is that the order authority who is not competent t< by the State counsel, it has been) altemative remedy of filing appeal Counsel for the petitioner s^ permitted to withdraw this petiticj respondent N0.1. He further decidirigthe said appeal expeditioi State counsel has no object) and the ssiine would be decided wi| Accordingly, the petiUone| petition with the aforesaid libertj appcal by the petitioner wifhin a of receipt of copy of this order, it to decide the saine within of its receipt. It is made clear that this on merits of the case and the autl to deoide the appeal strictly in acxij: subnkits bjectjion further beriod Cburt ^ti<it<n<i1ti "^TR^ ^f f^^i <F*I<-$K ^aifniisil^t for the peUtioner. for the State. petition is to the order dated fent No.2 suspending the petitioner ^ counsel for the petitioner in the [impugned has been passed by,the pass the same, In the retum filed |averred that the petitioner haa an ^gainst the suspension order. ibmits that at this stage, he may be |n with Uberty to file appeal before that direction may be issued for ^sly. if the petitioner ffles any appeal thin the stipulated time. is permitted to withdraw this r, In the eventuality of filing any twriod of three weeks from the date [s expected by the respondent N0.1 of two months fnom the date has not expressed any opinion .ority coneemed would be at Uberty >rdance with law. pri»^DW'akar Judfee ^