IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Contempt Petition No. 204 of 2003 Ex Hayat Singh … Petitioner Vs Mr. D.J. Govadia & another … Respondents Sri Alok Mehra, Advocate holding brief of Sri Manoj Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. By way of this contempt petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, the petitioner has prayed for summoning the opposite parties for committing willful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 25.08.2003 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 770(M/B) of 2003. 2. This Court vide order dated 25.08.2003 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 770 of 2003 (M/B) issued following directions:- “We are not going into the merits of the matter because till today, Regiment, Ranikhet has not disposed of pending representation of the petitioner dated 8.9.2003. We are, therefore, directing the Lieutenant Genera, Colonel of the Kumaon Regiment to dispose of the representation of the petitioner according to law. If necessary, the petitioner may also be heard by the Lieutenant General, Colonel of the Kumaon Regiment. The representation should be disposed of within a period of four weeks from today.” 3. The counter affidavit filed by Mr. D.J. Govadia, Brigadier, Kumaon Regiment Centre, Ranikhet, District 2 Almora indicates that Colonel of the Kumaon Regiment & Naga Regts and the Kumaon Scouts, Major General – A.S. Bahia has decided the representation vide letter dated 20.09.2003. This letter shows that the Colonel of the Kumaon Regement personally scrutinizing complaint in detail and was of the opinion that the petitioner violated the agreement on the number of occasions. 4. The aforesaid letter has been annexed as annexure No. 3 to the supplementary counter affidavit, which is available on the record. 5. In view of the aforesaid, it is quite clear that the representation of the petitioner has been decided by the Colonel of the Region. Thus, the impugned order dated 25.08.2003 has been complied with. 6. I do not find any merit in this contempt petition. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed. 7. Notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) 19.12.2008 ASWAL