HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 23 OF 2008 IN COURT RECEIVER REPORT NO. 88 OF 2008 IN APPEAL NO. 866 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO. 2435 OF 2005 Indu Patel and anr. ... Petitioner Versus Sudha Chowgule and Ors. ... Respondents And Indu Patel & Anr. ..Petitioners/Applicants Mr. F. Divitre, Sr. Counsel with Mr.J.P. Sen i/by M/s. Federal & Rashmikant for Petitioner. Mr. Karl Shroff i/by Crawford Bayley & Co. for Respondents. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, R.S. MOHITE, R.S. MOHITE,JJ. DATED: JULY 04, 2008 DATED: JULY 04, 2008 DATED: JULY 04, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard parties. . On behalf of the Applicants their learned counsel make submissions that the Court Receiver should be directed to remove the board put up in the premises of the property situated at 72, Pedar Road, Mumbai on the ground that it affects or likely to affect their business interest. On the other hand, on behalf of the Respondents, the learned counsel opposes the same pointing out that it is required, so that the third parties know the correct position. . Having heard the parties, in our opinion, this would not fall within Review jurisdiction considering that the matter has been heard and decided. Review Petition disposed of. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)