&^35ST T"" ^k^f'" ....-•• fi-f3'*t' -' -.°*'°" /" / >.^:^%5'r;.-. '?.*••••••"" ?<8STt"^-'-!'^"' ^-•'"' In fbe Honble' High Court ofJudicatiye of Clihattishearh at Bilaspur Petitioner . Resppndent ... W.P.No.JC1!' 2006 Shrimati Sarita Shanna aged 38 years, Wife ofGirja Kumar Shanna, Mahila Swastha Karyakarta, Up Swasthaya Kendra, Station Maroda, Prathmik Swasthaya Kei^a, Nikum Tahsil & District Durg (C.G.) Versus ,. <: 1. The State Govemment of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, Health & Family Welfare Deptt.Ministry, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) / 2. MukhyaChikitsa and Swastha Adhikari, Durg (C.G.) ' 3. Shrimati S.Maramma Rao, wife of Shri P.Pappaya Rao,aged 40 years Mahila Swastha Karyakarta, Station Maroda Bhilai Tahsil & Distt Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION under articles 226/227 ofthe Constitution oflndiafor the issuance ofwrit m the nature of mandamus, certirorai, prohibition andfor 'Suitable writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions The petitioner above named respectfully fumishes the particulars of the writ petition as under :- r XI-HC-22 3Dtn^I R-fi.'* 3IRRI sti+iw ^riicf .J-- ^t ^>'^i -g^ -i||<4|<.|<), s>Ti'iti<ldi, f^cll'yy ^^.:'Jsi/^o^ >(IiK?ilsbtli<»i""""""""""""'" —H^ sn^i ^aiwoll^i 13-1-2006 Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel] Shri Vivek Sharma, Panel Law^erforthe Heard. Learned counsel for the petiti^ner petition against the order dated 2^- transferred. He further submits that f<tir opportunity of filing the detaiied repr^sentation the respondents, whichshall be con^i iaw. Sftate Prayer is not opposed by the Having considered and withopt the case, in the opinion ofthis Court,| given to the petitioner to make a before the competent authority of petition within 15 days from today, competent authority of the inaccordance with law as eariy as the date ofreceiptofthe representaticjn With the aforesaid observationt Consequently M.W.P.No. Certified copy as per rules. respondefits . •wfeia^iniigf^fsisftfsR^R ^T3lt?TO3Ii^t for the petitioner. iState. submits that the petitioner has fited this i-4-2005 whereby the petitioner has been the presentthe petitioner may be given an before the competent authority of iidered on jts own merits in accordance with counsel. expressing any opinion on the merits of |ends ofjustice will be served if a direction is dejtailed representation raising her grievances respondents atong with a copy of the ^nd on such representation being'filed.the shall decide thesame on its own merits Ipossible preferably within two months from s, this petition stands disposed of. also stands disposed_ef 13942006 Sd'- Fakhruddin .)ud9e [TTt^ ^Pa'q