THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 24047 of 2006 DATED: 18-11-2006 Between: Vadde Sattamma …petitioner and The Superintendent of Police, Mahabubnagar District and others. …Respondents. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 24047 of 2006. Oral order: The grievance of the petitioner is as regards to failure of the 4th respondent to register the petitioner’s complaints 4-4-2006 and 17-6-2006 alleging commission of a cognizable offence by respondents 5 to 8. In respect of such grievance, the petitioner has a statutory remedy available under Section 190 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. In view of the decision in HARI SINGH V. THE STATE OF U.P[1] the petitioner’s grievance that the 4th respondent has not registered his complaints, which disclose information as to the commission of a cognizable offence, cannot be entertained by this court under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner must be relegated to pursue his remedies under Section 190 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy. No order as to costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 18th November, 2006. GRR [1] 2006 (5) SUPREME 513