THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.13879 of 2009 Date: 16.03.2011 Between : M. Ram Reddy .… Petitioner and The General Manager/Telecom District Manager, BSNL, Telecom District, Mahabubnagar District. …. Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.13879 of 2009 ORDER : Heard Sri Kunareddy Anjireddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Sri R.S. Murthy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-B.S.N.L. 2. This writ petition has been filed complaining inaction of the respondent in payment of bills in respect of the works said to have been executed by the petitioner. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that he executed the works relating to the laying of C.C. road and fixing M.S. grill over a compound wall in T.B. Building at Dhanwada and a horizontal expansion to T.E. Building at Dhanwada Phase-II. He made several representations seeking payment of the amount from the respondent for execution of the said works. As the said representations did not evoke any response, the petitioner filed W.P.No.16252 of 2003. In the said writ petition, it was represented on behalf of the respondent that if any amount was due as per the details furnished by the petitioner for the years 1997 to 1999, the same would be paid. In view of the said representation, the writ petition was disposed of by order dated 30.12.2003, directing the petitioner to make available the details of works carried out and the bills for the said works with work certificates to the respondent within a period of four weeks and on furnishing the said details, the respondent was directed to consider and pass appropriate orders. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the said directions of this Court, the petitioner submitted the details of works along with the bills, but the respondent has not considered the same. 5. As could be seen from the material produced in the writ petition, the respondent issued letters dated 26.2.2004 and 9.3.2004 calling upon the petitioner to submit the details of works to enable to consider for payment of the amount. It is stated that in response to the said letters, the petitioner submitted a detailed representation dated 10.6.2005 along with the bills. 6. Sri R.S. Murthy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent, on instructions, would submit that the respondent has not received such representation. However, he fairly submits that if the petitioner submits the details of the works and the bills, afresh, even at this stage, the respondent would consider the same for payment. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while acceding to the same, seeks permission of this Court to submit the details once again. 7. In view of the said submissions, the following order is passed: (i) The petitioner shall submit a representation with all the details relating to the works executed by him along with the relevant bills within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order; and (ii) on receipt of such representation, the respondent shall consider and make payment, if the petitioner is found eligible for the same, within a period of eight weeks thereafter. 8. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. No order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI 16.03.2011. Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.13879 of 2009 16.03.2011 (Msr)