IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22540 of 2008 DEEPAK KUMAR CHOUBEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 24.07.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State. The case has been instituted against the petitioner for offence u/Ss 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code with the allegation that the Domicile Certificate issued in favour of the petitioner from the office of S.D.M. Jagdishpur is fake as in the office register at serial No. 1903/06, Domicile Certificate has been issued in the name of Ayodhya Ram , s/o Ram Bachan Ram, of village Jhauan but in the Domicile Certificate of the petitioner, same serial No. has been mentioned. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the address, parentage and the residents of the petitioner as mentioned in the certificate as well as the present address of the petitioner is same. This is only the mistake committed in the office of S.D.O. where a wrong serial no. has been mentioned. So far the signature of the S.D.O. is concerned, that has been found genuine and there is no motive for committing any forgery. Considering the facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner, Deepak Kumar Chaubey is - 2 - allowed. In the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in the court below, he will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 168/07 to the satisfaction of CJM, Bhojpur , Ara subject to the conditions as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. AKV/ (Mridula Mishra,J.)