IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2009 / 18TH POUSHA 1930 LA.App..No. 40 of 2009 ------------------------------- LAR.263/2005 OF THE SUB COURT, THALASSERY .................... APPELLANT/2ND RESPONDENT --------------------------------------------- THE GENERAL MANAGER, K.S.I.D.C, KESTON ROAD, P.O.KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.D.KRISHNANKUTTY PILLAI SRI.SHEEJO CHACKO RESPONDENTS/CLAIMANT AND IST RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. M.N.ABDUL RAZAK, AZEEZ MANZIL, NEERVELI. 2. GOVT.OF KERALA , REP.BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- L.A.A.No.40 of 2009 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 8th day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT This appeal is preferred against the award of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Thalassery in L.A.R.No.263 of 2005. Land having an extent of 0.0005 hectare in R.S.No.16/4 of Kuthuparamba Village had been acquired and a compensation of Rs.7,197/- has been fixed. The land acquisition Court fixed the centage value at Rs.10000/- per cent and awarded compensation. It is against that decision the present appeal is filed. 2. It has to be borne in mind that the extent involved in this case is very negligible and a learned Judge of this Court in the very same acquisition proceedings had taken a view that when the extent involved is negligible, there need not be any interference considering the said fact. I also take the same view, but make it clear that this shall not be treated as a precedent in any other case for getting compensation. Accordingly the appeal is disposed of. Consequently, I.A.No.88 of 2009 stands closed. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE vns