// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3988/2004 Smt. Amri W/o late Shri Abdul Rehman & Others ...Petitioners Versus Board of Revenue, Ajmer & Others ...Respondents Date of Order ::: 25.03.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Satya Narayan Kumawat, Counsel for petitioners Ms. Manju Dave, Addl. Govt. Advocate, for the Respondents State #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition before this Court on 17th June, 2004 challenging the impugned order of the Revenue Board passed on 25th August, 1999. There is a delay of about five years in its filing and the petitioner has not explained the delay, therefore, the present writ petition is liable to be dismissed being highly belated. Apart from the above, I have also examined the merits of the case. The Board of Revenue, in its impugned order dated 25th August, 1999, has considered the facts of the case as well as position of law relating to Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling and Agricultural Holding Act, 1973 in detail and rightly dismissed the appeal of the petitioners. I do not find any illegality in the order passed by the Revenue Board so as to // 2 // interfere in it. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the writ petition, and the same is dismissed being filed after a delay of about five years as well as on merits also. No order as to costs. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman// // 3 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Misc. Stay Application No.3421/2004 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3988/2004 Smt. Amri W/o late Shri Abdul Rehman & Others ...Petitioners Versus Board of Revenue, Ajmer & Others ...Respondents Date of Order ::: 25.03.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Satya Narayan Kumawat, Counsel for petitioners Ms. Manju Dave, Addl. Govt. Advocate, for the Respondents State #### By the Court:- Consequent upon dismissal of the writ petition itself, the stay application, filed therewith, does not survive and the same is also dismissed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//