IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. G.C.R.No.11 of 2000 Date of Decision:18.03.2010 Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh ....Petitioner Versus M/s Industrial Cable Ltd. ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR. Present: Mr.Gurpreet Singh, Sr.Standing counsel, for the petitioner. None for the respondent. ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J. (ORAL) The Customs, Excise & Gold (Control), Appellate Tribunal has referred the following substantial question of law for adjudication by this Court:- “Whether prior to 6.10.88 Rule 57-I of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was subject to the provisions of Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944?” In the present case, the manufacturer wrongly availed the modvat credit, during the period 7.4.86 to 12.4.86 on certain items without filing declaration for them under Rule 57-G of the Central Excise Rules,1944. The revenue had raised a demand for recovery of wrongly availed modvat credit in April, 1987. The question is whether prior to 6.10.88, there was any limitation to claim recovery of wrongly availed modvat credit. Section 11-A of the Central Excise Act was not on the statute book when the demand was made in April, 1987. This provision was inserted on 6.10.1988 and as the demand of recovery of wrongly availed modvat credit was prior to 6.10.88, hence, there was no question of any limitation claiming the recovery. Resultantly, the question posed is answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. (ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA) JUDGE March 18, 2010 (MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR) AS JUDGE