Cr.MP(M) No.296 of 2008 24.4.2008. Present: Mr.M.L. Brakta, counsel for the petitioner. Mr.J.S. Guleria, Law Officer, for the respondent. Mr.T.S. Chauhan, counsel for the complainant. Mr.T.S. Chauhan, Advocate, has filed Power of Attorney on behalf of the complainant. He makes submissions that he wants to file reply to the petition. There is no necessity of filing the reply by him. The complainant is duly represented by the State of Himachal Pradesh and instructions can be given to the learned Law Officer representing the State. I have considered the report of the police. The girl has been recovered and she has also made a statement to the police that she had gone voluntarily, though her age was below 18 years. In view of the fact that the girl has been recovered and the petitioner is the uncle of the boy who has allegedly abducted the girl, there is no question of denying the relief to the applicant. Therefore, the application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of the arrest of the petitioner, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal and surety bond in the sum of Rs.5,000/- each to the satisfaction of the I.O./SHO, Police Station Paonta Sahib and subject to the condition that the petitioner shall join investigation as and when called by the police. Dasti copy. April 24, 2008. (TILAK) (V.K. Ahuja), Judge.