(%7 (337A $§mgm mm ¢ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsGARH AT BILAspug (c.G.1 Ly l WRIT PETITION No. M84l2009 Narrendra Kumar Kherwar S/o Shri Hira Singh Aged about 33 Years R/o- Gram-Dongaama, Post- Nonberrra, Tehsil—Kartala, District-Korba, (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS 1. /State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) . RESPONDENTS 2. The Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Kartala District- Korba (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22'6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITs AND DIRECTIONS: ‘ WWW ammw mm WW X mmfgam E agmm SE 93.09.2099 : HON‘BLE SHRI JUSTIC i PRITINKE V . V Shri Matin Siddiqui, co‘jlnsel for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita.Jain, PL. foi the State. Contention of the counrel for the petitioner is that recently the State Government has issue¢i a circular dated 5.3.2008 regarding regularization of the daily wa employees and therefore at this stage he Wants to withdraw this pe ition with liberty to file representation before the respondent No.1 s king redressai of the grievances of the petitioner. He however sub its that direction may be issued for deciding the representation so made, expeditiously. Counsel for the State l as no objection if the petitioner makes i any representation and the sgme is being decided in accordance with law. Accordingly the petitio is dismissed as Withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. In tl'ie eventuality of making any such representation by the petitiorler, the same is expected to be decided l 3w- by the authority concerned, e peditiously. Pritinker Diwakelj‘ Judge WW ’%€!W $31fmm SB 93.09.2009 : HONsBLE SHRI JUSTIC ’ PR TI . V Shri Matin Siddiqui, co‘Lnsel for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, P.L. f0? the State. State Government has issue a circular dated 5.3.2008 regarding regularization of the daily wa employees and therefore at this stage he wants to withdraw this pe ition with liberty to file representation before the respondent No.1 s king redressal of the grievances of the petitioner, He however sub its that direction may be issued for deciding the representation so made, expeditiously. Counsel for the State as no objection if the petitioner makes i any representation and the s me is being decided in accordance with law. Accordingly the petitio is’disrnissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. In ti e eventuality of making any such representation by the petitio 1 Sdl- Pritinker Diwakeri Judge Contention of the counfel for the petitioner is that recently the &“‘ B%§C§g:—--—n—-———— LT._. mr.__....er, the same is expected to be decided by the authority concerned, e peditiously. W_. p4