IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 20th day of April, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 1154 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Manoj Singh @ Ravindra Sahay .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 175/2009, U/s 420 IPC, PS Dalanwala, District Dehradun. April 20, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Advocate for the applicant, Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State and Mr. Sandeep Tandon, Advocate for the complainant. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant argued that applicant is simply an employee of the company and was not involved in cheating or fraud and he is in jail since 23.9.2009 and he has no previous criminal history. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Manoj Singh @ Ravindra Sahay be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 20.4.2010 PRABODH