WP(C) 3451/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE N. KOTISWAR SINGH Heard Mr. R Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. D Sinha, learne d Central Government Advocate. The petitioner has approached this court under Article 226 of the Constitution o f India contending that he has been wrongly denied appointment. The petitioner w as a candidate for appointment to the post of constable/ Masalchi in the Central Reserve Police Force in the year 2010 and he was duly selected for the aforesai d post. However, at the time of medical examination, he was declared unfit becau se of certain multiple while patches with scattering and darkening of skin. In view of the above, his candidature was rejected. Having been aggrieved, the p etitioner has approached this Court . The petitioner before approaching before this Court got himself examined with t he Resident Physician, Department of Dermatology, Gauhati Medical College Hospit al who had given his expert opinion on 201.2.2010 stating that in his opinion t he petitioner does not suffer from any chronic or infectious skin disease. In h is opinion, the petitioner inherited the disease from his father and it is a non infective genetic disorder and requires no treatment being only discoloration o f skin. In view of the fact that the petitioner is medically fit in the light o f the above opinion of the Resident doctor, the petitoiner seeks a direction fro m this Court to direct the respondent authority to appoint him to the post of co nstable/ Masalchi. The respondents have filed their affidavit-in opposition wher ein it has been stated that the petitioner was earlier declared unfit by Dr. GK Kabui, CMD (OG) CH, CRPF, Imphal on 18.2.2011. Thereafter, he was examined by a Review Medical Examination at CH, CRPF, Jammu and was again declared unfit. It h as been stated that even though the disease is not harmful still he was declare d unfit by the Medical Board , Jammu. However, it is seen from the affidavit -in - opposition that even though the petitioner was stated to have been medically e xamined by the Medical Board of Jammu, no records has been annexed as to show th e Court whether such Review Board consisted of any Specialist in dermatology or not and also to the opinion given by them. In course of hearing the learned cou nsel for the petitioner has referred to certain decisions of this court whereby in such a situation where there was dispute as regards the medical fitness of a candidate, the Court had directed for a review Medical Examination by a Medical Board by the authority which would consist of an expert member. The learned cou nsel has referred to WP ' No.5501 of 2010 , Hiranya Kalita Vs.Union of India & O rs, Judgement and order dated 19.1.2011 and WP ( C) No. 5873 of 2010, E. Nilacha ndra Singh -Vs- Union of India, Judgment and order dated 24.02.2011.. I have gon e through these Judgments and I am also of the opinion that this present writ pe tition can be disposed of by directing the authority to constitute a review medi cal board which would include a Specialist in Dermatology and have the petitione r examined within a period of one month. In the event of the review medical boar d finding the petitioner medically fit for service, the case of the petitioner w ill not be rejected on the ground of medical fitness and the respondents will ta ke all necessary steps for the appointment of the petitioner in accordance with law.