HEGH COURT ERIT PETITION (L) No. x PETITIONER OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 1384 $2018 : Chhanisgarh Coxporation, Through _ — cture Development (Transport Dep wastmcture _ artment) Raipur (C.G.) Deveiopmem VERSUS ~ Satish Shanna S/o, Shri Shauna, lama Caloney, Gudhian‘, Raipur (C.G. Chhattisgarh Comoraiion Chalk! Prasad House No. 379, Labour Courg Raipur, ) 6% Aiier having heard hamsd counse! for the petitioner and on perusal of 111s pleadings and documents appended thereto, the charge-sheet does not indicate that the respondent—employee has committed similar defaults in the past. The charge-sheet indieates that the respondent working as Conductor has failed to issue tickets to some passengers which was not found proved in the enquiry. The Labour Court by its order dated 10.04.2006 (Armexure PM) has held that the petitioneremployer has failed to» prove the charges and quashed the order dated 23.6.2001 (Annexure P/6) and directed reinstatement with back wages. In an appeal filed by the petitioner, the industrial Court, after having considered the facts of the case and submissions made by the parties, confirmed the findings recorded by the Trial Court and dismissed the appeal. There is no procedural irregularity and infirmity in the orders passed by the Courts below. The findings recorded by the Courts below appear to be correct and do not warrant any interference. The petition is devoid ofmerit and is accordingly dismissed. summarily. sir/— Satish K.Agnihaui g ' Judge Amit