In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-23733 of 2009 (O&M) Nishan Singh ..... Petitioner vs State of Haryana ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Ashit Malik and Mr. KS Dhaliwal, Advocates, for the petitioner. Mrs. Ritu Punj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner is involved in other cases as well, as two other FIRs have been registered against him, the details of which are as under:- 1. FIR No. 282 dated 25.5.2005 under Sections 307, 148, 149 IPC and under Sections 25, 54, 59 of the Arms Act, Police Station City Karnal. 2, FIR No. 282 dated 15.11.2006 under Sections 392, 34 IPC and under Sections 25, 54, 59 of the Arms Act, Police Station Madhuban, District Karnal. In the present case also, as per material on record the petitioner has played an active role in the entire episode. Both times when the agreement to sell was signed, all the accused including the petitioner had come in the car owned by the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid facts and considering the credentials of the petitioner, I do not find any reason to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. 1.9.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge