:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ORIGINAL SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY PETITION NO. 913 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 913 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 913 OF 2004 M/s.Center Engineering . ...Petitioners vs. Alumayer (India) Ltd ...Respondents ------- Petitioners and advocate absent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. 18th 18th 18th January, 2007. January, 2007. January, 2007. P.C P.C P.C :- :- :- 1. It appears that repeatedly time was sought to comply with the office objections and ultimately in July 2005, time was sought to remove the office objections. Their doesn’t appear to have been any progress made despite the office objections being removed according to the petitioner on 11.7.2005. 2. The matter is of 2004 and when it was placed for admission, none appeared for the petitioner. Company Petition is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution. sd/- :2: :2: :2: (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)