HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No. 4508 of 2009 O R D E R: The petitioner/A14 is accused of offences punishable under Sections 120- B, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471/34 IPC in CC No.73 of 2009 on the file of VI Additional Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Guntur along with 13 others. 2. In this case, it is alleged that A-1 intended to grab certain land which is by the side of NH-5 road in the outskirts of Guntur city by employing persons to impersonate the original owner of that land and stage-managed registration of a sale deed in the office of Sub Registrar, Pedakakani by an imposter. A-14, who is the petitioner herein, is stated to be consulting A-1 who is a Sidhanti. It is alleged that A-14 also was purchasing and selling plots after consulting A-1. It is specifically alleged that on 26-07-2005 A-1,A5,A7,A9 and A13 to A15 proceeded to Sub Registrar’s Office, Pedakakani for registration of the 2nd respondent’s land by a imposter-A-5 in favour of another and that A-14 invested Rs.65,000/- to A-1 to meet pre-registration expenses relating to that registration affair through an imposter and that A-1 promised to pay A-14 double the amount after selling the property obtained by such sale deed through an imposter. This is not a case where A-14 simply lent amount to A-1 on interest. This is a case where doubling of the advanced amount was agreed upon between A1 and A14. Further, the allegations are to the effect that A-14 also accompanied A1 and others to the Sub-Registrar’s Office, Pedakakani, at the time of registration of the document through imposter. The prosecution alleges conspiracy also in this case and the police filed charge sheet for offence punishable under Section 120-B IPC also and the lower court took cognizance of the offence under Section 120-B IPC also. 3. Having regard to specific allegations made against A-14, this court is of the opinion that it is a matter which has to be decided after full trial and that this court cannot exercise its powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings at its inception. 4. Hence the criminal petition is dismissed. ____________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J 08-10-2010 Mjl/*