IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Application No. 378 of 2007 Criminal Application No. 378 of 2007 Criminal Application No. 378 of 2007 in in in Criminal Revision Application No.546 of 2007 Criminal Revision Application No.546 of 2007 Criminal Revision Application No.546 of 2007 Jiveraj Bhuraji Mali & Ors. ..Applicants versus State of Maharashtra & Others ..Respondents Mr.Niranjan Mundargi for the Applicant Ms. R.M.Gadhavi APP for the State Coram : D.G.Karnik, J. Coram : D.G.Karnik, J. Coram : D.G.Karnik, J. Dated : 4th Dec., 2007 Dated : 4th Dec., 2007 Dated : 4th Dec., 2007 P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants were on bail during the pendency of the trial and also on bail during the pendency of the appeal. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that each of them were released on bail of cash security of Rs.20,000/- and the cash has already been deposited. Accordingly, it is directed that the applicants be released on bail of cash security of Rs.20,000/- each. 3. If the applicants have already deposited the cash during the pendency of the trial, the said cash -2- security shall be continued during the pendency of this appeal also. 4. This bail is subject to the same conditions as were in operation during the course of trial and appeal. 5. Application disposed of accordingly. (D.G.Karnik, J.) (D.G.Karnik, J.) (D.G.Karnik, J.)