IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No. 1263 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 28, 2010 Chamail Singh …Appellant Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Suvir Sehgal, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. Notice of motion. Mr. Suvir Sehgal, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in the Court, accepts notice. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, appeal is taken up for final disposal today itself. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent, challenges order dated 1.5.2009, passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in CWP No. 15461 of 1989. The aforesaid petition was filed by the appellant and the learned Single Judge has issued direction to the respondents to hold and complete the inquiry on the charge sheet which was issued on 26.4.1985. The inquiry was LPA No. 1263 of 2009 (O&M) required to be completed within a period of four months and appropriate orders were required to be passed by the disciplinary authority thereafter. Learned State counsel has submitted that in pursuance of the aforesaid directions, inquiry has now been completed and the disciplinary authority has passed an order dated 21.4.2010, terminating the services of the appellant with effect from 15.5.1982. A copy of the aforementioned order of termination is taken on record as Mark ‘A’. Accordingly, the instant appeal and the writ petition have been rendered infructuous. However, the appellant shall be entitled to challenge the order of termination in accordance with law. The appeal and the miscellaneous application stand disposed of in the above terms. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (A.N. JINDAL) July 28, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2