Ss894.01 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 894 OF 2001 Dadi P. Hataria & Ors. ...Plaintiffs. Vs. M/s. Faramroze & Associate & Ors. ...Defendants. Mr. Avinash Joshi i/by M/s. Mulla and Mulla for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Dipesh U. Siroya for Defendant Nos. 1 and 2. Ms. Tanaz D Hataria for the Defendants. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 11TH MARCH, 2010. P.C.- 1 The parties have settled the matter in summary suit and accordingly signed the consent terms dated 11/03/2010. All the parties are present in the Court. It is counter signed by the Plaintiffs’ advocate and advocate appearing for Defendant Nos. 1 and 2. Defendant No.3 is present in the Court. The contents are explained by the advocate to her and she understood the same. There is no objection with regard to the signature, identity and authorization. The parties have agreed/ accepted the undertaking - clause 3(vii) and 5. The Court is also accepted the same. Ss894.01 2 2 The statement is made that the consent terms is well within the framework of law and the record and no third party/ person will be affected by this consent terms. 3 The summary suit is, accordingly, disposed of in view of the consent terms. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)