IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10744 of 2009 1. RAMASHISH PRASAD s/o late Ram Kishun Singh, resident of village- Sabalpur, P.O. + P.S. Rajgir, District- Nalanda. 2. Dharm Nath Shahi s/o late Rajgirihi Shahi, resident of village- Paterha, P.S. Maharajganj, District- Siwan. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Principal Secretary, Department of Cooperative,Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Registrar, Cooperative Society,Bihar,Patna. 3. The Administrator, Bihar State Cooperative Marketing Union Ltd. (BISCOMAUN) BISCOMAUN Bhawan,Patna. 4. The Managing Director, Bihar State Cooperative Marketing union Ltd. (BISCOMAUN), BISCOMAUN Bhawan,Patna. with CWJC No.11755 of 2009 SRI ARUN KUMAR SINGH s/o late Ram Prasad Singh, resident of House No. 409,Pushpanjali, Sursudha Lane,East Boaring Road, P.S. Budha Colony,District-Patna. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Department of Cooperative,Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Registrar, Cooperative Society,Bihar,Patna. 3. The Bihar State Cooperative Marketing Union Ltd., Biscomaun Bhawan,West Gandhi Maidan, Patna through its Administrator 4. The Administrator, Bihar State Cooperative Marketing Union Ltd. (BISCOMAUN) Bhawan,Patna. 5. The Special Officer, Bihar State Cooperative Marketing Union Ltd (BISCOMAUN),BISCOMAUN Bhawan.West Gandhi Maidan,Patna. 5. The Managing Director, Bihar State Cooperative Marketing Union Ltd. (BISCOMAUN), BISCOMAUN Bhawan,Patna. ----------- 3 18.9.09 These two writ petitions involved the same question. The petitioners being employees of BISCOMAUN whether they would superannuate at the age of 58 years or 60 years, this question was squarely answered by this Court, inter alia, in C.W.J.C.No.5387 of 2009 2 decided on 22.6.2009 as between the same parties of the second writ petition .They had come to this Court against the order of the Administrator as communicated by the Managing Director dated 30.7.2009 whereby it is said that pursuant to the judgment of this Court, as noted above, the age of superannuation would increase from 58 years to 60 years with immediate effect, that is 30.7.2009, which is contrary to the judgment of this Court where the effect is to take place from 2.11.2007. In my view, having both set of petitioners come to this Court well in time, they will be entitled to the extended age of superannuation and would retire only on attaining the age of 60 years. I may note that this relief is limited and restricted to the petitioners. The decision in this regard has been dealt with and discussed in detail in CWJC No. 14312 of 2008, disposed of on 17.9.2009 by this Curt. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petitions stand disposed of. Singh ( Navaniti Prasad Singh,J.)