IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 347 of 2010 (S/S) Gagan Singh son of Shri Nain Singh and 18 others. …… Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand through its Secretary Secondary Public Works Department, Government of Uttarakhand, Dehradun and 2 others. … Respondents. Mr. Harendra Belwal, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. K.C.Tiwari, Brief Holder, learned counsel for the respondents-State. Date July 12, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard Mr. Harendra Belwal, Advocate, for the petitioners and learned Brief Holder Mr. K.C.Tiwari, for the respondents. Learned counsel for the parties made a statement at Bar that the controversy raised in the present writ petition has already been settled by the learned Single Judge and confirmed by a Division Bench of this Court vide judgment and order dated 4-3- 2006 passed in Special Appeal No. 66 of 2005, State of Uttaranchal and others Vs. Pushkar Bhatt and others. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is disposed of finally on the same terms and observations made by the Division Bench of this Court vide judgment and order dated 4-3- 2006 passed in Special Appeal No. 66 of 2005, State of Uttaranchal and others Vs. Pushkar Bhatt and others. ( B.S.Verma, J. ) RCP