HON’BLE SRI G.S. SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. V.SEETHAPATHY WRIT PETITION No. 14776 OF 2006 Between: Mukulothu Keeru Bai ……Petitioner And The Election Commissioner of Andhra Pradesh, Budda Bhavan, Secunderabad and three ……Respondents :: ORDER :: Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri I. Laxmikanth Rao Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 3: Sri V.V.Prabhakar Rao Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 4: Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj Dated: 28-07-2006 Per G.S. SINGHVI, CJ Learned counsel for State Election Commission says that he would advise his client and through him, the concerned election authorities to allow the petitioner to participate in the process of election. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to file miscellaneous petition for revival of the petition as well as initiation of contempt proceedings against the concerned officers, if they fail to abide by the order passed by this Court on 18-07-2006 coupled with the assurance given by the learned counsel for State Election Commission. At this stage, learned counsel for State Election Commission stated that the petitioner may be directed to go to the polling booth along with an application which may be submitted to the Returning Officer. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that he would advise his client accordingly. G.S.SINGHVI, CJ Dt.28.7.2006 G.V.SEETHAPATHY,J ks