IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2004 of 2006 Between: K.Bhaskar Reddy S/o.K.Raghava Reddy R/o.H.No.12-13, Kodandaram nagar, P&T colony Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Inspector of Police, Saroornagar P.S., Ranga Reddy District 2 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District, at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:NONE APPEARED Counsel for the Respondents:AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal. In this writ petition, the petitioner questioned the inaction of the respondents in investigating a case in Crime No.835 of 2005 registered in pursuance of the private complaint filed by the petitioner before the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, L.B.Nagar. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. In the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.1, it is inter alia stated that the dispute between the petitioner and the accused is in respect of a compound wall and that as no evidence proving the culpability of the accused could be found in the investigation, the Investigating Officer referred the complaint of the petitioner as not being supported by evidence and that a notice was sent to the petitioner on 25.01.2006 in this regard. It is further stated that a final report was filed before the jurisdictional Magistrate. No reply affidavit is filed controverting the averments contained in the counter-affidavit. Having regard to the final report filed by the Investigating Officer before the jurisdictional Magistrate, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a protest petition, at his option. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition, WPMP.No.2426 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 5th JUNE, 2009. kvni