IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 15TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3699 of 2011(J) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. G.KARUNAKARAN, KARUNALAYAM, VATTAPARA, PADIYOOR P.O., KANNUR. 2. ROBIN.M.J, MUTTATHUKATTIL HOUSE, VATTAPARA, PADIYOOR P.O., KANNUR. 3. JAMES.K, KIZHICHIRA HOUSE, VATTAPARA, PADIYOOR P.O., KANNUR. 4. BABU.N, NEENDOOR HOUSE, VATTAPARA, PADIYOOR P.O., KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.J.JULIAN XAVIER SRI.FIROZ K.ROBIN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN- 695 001 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KANNUR DISTRICT.670 001 3. CONVENER, SINGLE WINDOW CLEARANCE BOARD, DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTER, KANNUR.670 001 4. PADIYOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PADIYOOR P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT-670 703. 5. MANKUTHAL CRUSHERS PRIVATE LIMITED, ERITTY P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT-670 703, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, (SRI.TOMY M.MATHEW). R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P (C) No.3699 of 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 4th February, 2011 J U D G M E N T The prayer sought in the writ petition is for a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P3 which is an objection filed by the petitioners against the grant of a quarrying and blasting licence for which the 5th respondent appears to have made an application. 2. If as stated by the petitioners, such an application made by the 5th respondent is pending, it is directed that respondents should consider Ext.P3 also as and when the said application is taken up for consideration. 3. It is made clear that this Court has only directed the consideration of Ext.P3 representation and has not expressed anything on the merits of the contentions raised and it is entirely for the 3rd respondent to deal with the objection, in accordance with law. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 3rd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma /True copy/ P.A to Judge