WP(C) No.525/2007 Page 1 of 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.525/2007 % Date of Decision: 06.07.2011 Sh.Ram Kumar …. Petitioner Through Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate Versus Union of India, Through Ministry of Defence & Ors. …. Respondents Through Mr.Nitish Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA 1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NO ANIL KUMAR, J. * 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the question of the petitioner being declared as surplus was taken up by the counsel for the petitioner and argued before the Tribunal, however, no finding had been given by the Tribunal. WP(C) No.525/2007 Page 2 of 2 2. In the circumstances, on instructions from the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an appropriate application for review of the order along with an application for condonation of delay in filing the application for review in the facts and circumstances of the case 3. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Tribunal to seek review of the impugned order and condonation of delay in filing the review application in accordance with law. ANIL KUMAR, J. SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J. July 06, 2011. vk