HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR Criminal Petition No.2544 of 2009 Date: 16-11-2011 Between M.A.Ravi Chandran and another … Petitioners/Accused 1 and 2 and M.S.Arumugam Mudaliar … Respondent/De facto complainant The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad … Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR Criminal Petition No.2544 of 2009 Order: Heard Sri E.Venkata Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners- accused 1 and 2; Sri M.N.Narasimha Reddy, learned counsel for the 1st respondent-de facto complainant; and Sri K.Venkateswara Rao, learned counsel, representing the learned Public Prosecutor for the 2nd respondent-State. 2. The petitioners herein are the accused 1 and 2 in C.C.No.6 of 2008 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nagari, Chittoor district. They filed this petition to quash the proceedings against them in the said case. 3. The offences alleged against the petitioners herein are those punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 506 read with Section 34 of IPC. The 1st petitioner is accused No.1 and the 2nd petitioner is accused No.2. It must also be noted that the 1st petitioner is stated to be son-in-law of the 2nd petitioner and at the same time, he is also one of the sons of the de facto complainant. 4. The charge-sheet allegations read that out of family disputes, the 1st petitioner, on the ill-advice of the 2nd petitioner, stealthily took away cash of Rs.2,00,000/-, some gold ornaments and some documents pertaining to immoveable property and in that connection, the case was registered on the report of the de facto complainant for the aforesaid offences. The allegations as such do disclose criminal offences. 5. The plea of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that both the petitioners are innocent and this criminal case is the outcome of a civil dispute pertaining to a family dispute, but this is a disputed question of fact, which cannot be gone into in this petition. It may be noted that the allegations in the case do disclose the offences. Hence, this is not a fit case for interference of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. 6. This criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. _____________________ N.RAVI SHANKAR, J. 16th November, 2011. Ak HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR Criminal Petition No.2544 of 2009 16th November, 2011. (Ak)