HIGaiCOURTOFCHHATTISGARH.BILASPUR WRITAPPEAI, N0.872009 D.B.: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR SINHA 8i HON'BU; SHRI JUSTnCE T.P. SHARMA APPELLANTS/ RESPONDENTS RESPQNDENTS 1. ARUN PANDEY, son of Shri Shailendra Pandey, aged , resident of G.E. Road, Oxygen Conlpany, Kumhari, TahsU Dhamda, Distt. Durg (C.G). 2. PRAMOD CHANDRAKAR, ^ed about 26 ye£U-s, S/o Shri Tikehdra Chandrakar, r/o village Kugda, Tahsil Patan.Distt. Durg (C.G). 3. RADHELAL s/o Shri Panchram, r/o village Chorha, Tahsil Dhamda, Dist^. Duirg(C,G). 4. MOHANLAL, S/cr Shri Sukhrii, R/o vUlage ehorha, Tahsil Dhamda, Distt. Diu-g (C.G) Versus-.' : : • : •.. ' ^ 1 STATE OF CHHATnSGARH, through GoUector, Durg (C.G'. .(. •.. . ...;... ^- r"; ^. ^— • . . .:• . .', 2. NAYAB 1'AHSILDAR, Dhamda, Durg ;M-G).::::'<:;;?. \-,..;:,' ,;:-.^ 3 ADDL.COLLEGTOR, DURG (G.G). 4. SUPERINTENDENT Land Records Section, Durg(C.G). 5. BOARD OF REVENUE (Circyit Court Raipyr), near Collectorate Bilaspur, Tah.And Distt. Bilaspur(C.G). 6. DEEPTI AGRAWAL, Aged aboi.it 29 years, w/o Shri Kamal KlshoreAgrawal, r/o 159 Shiv Ashish, Sainta Colohy, RAIPUR (C.G) WMTAPPEAL^NDE^STCTlON20FTHECHHATTISGARHmOH GOURT (AI(PEAL TO DEVISIONBENCH) RUfcES. 200|6 W.A.No. 8/2009 AuDearance : Shri V.G. Tamaskar, counsel for the petitioriers. Shn Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Advocate, for the State/respohdents No. 1 to 4, on advancecopy. ORAI-ORDER {20.01.2009) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J Heard on admission. This appeal has been filed by 4 respondents of Writ Petition (C ) No.6829/2008 against that portion of the orderwhich reads as follows: "I.A.No.l This is an application for grant ofuiterim relief. ^ Having regard to the facts situatiori of the case, status quo with regard to the petition schedule land as obtained today, shall be inaintauied tiU the hextdate ofhearing. In view of the above, I.A.No. 1 stands disposed pf A perusal 6f the said oi-der would shpw that the writ cauit ex- parte granted status quo with regard to the petition schedule land as it obtained on 12.12.2008 and notices were issued t6 the respondents. The respondents, without agitating against the said order before the writ Court have rushed to this Court in appeal. In the facts and cirGuinstances of this case, we are not inclined to admit this appeal forhearing. However, the appellants shall be at liberty to appear before the writ Court and Ele an appropriate application for modification/vacation of the impugned order and pray for a bi-party order. The appellahts shall also be at liberty to take all * the grounds which they have taken in this appeal. With the aforesaid observations, this appeal stands finally disposed of. ^L^MARS^ ^ Jadge Sd/- TP.Sharma Judge '!':!.