1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.199/2009. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for petitioner; ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 21 st August,2009. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the original complainant. 2. The accused was prosecuted for an offence under Section 498A, 306 and 524 r/w 34 of IPC in Sessions Case No. 119/2008. The learned Judge, on analysis of evidence, acquitted the accused by order dated 8th May, 2009. It is this order, which the complainant feels to be not in conformity to the settled position of law. 3. Having gone through the judgment under challenge, I find that the prosecution could not establish that accused no.1 – Sadashiv Rambhau Udawant, husband of the deceased Rukminibai, or accused nos. 2 and 3, being relatives, had common intention at Ambad on 23rd December, 2005, where the deceased was subjected to cruelty within the meaning of Section 2 498A of IPC. The analysis of the evidence carried by the learned Judge was only the possible view. No infirmity. Criminal Revision application rejected. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/crrv199.09