AB 1454/2011 BEFORE HON\BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Heard Mr. AR Shome, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. BS Sinha , learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This application under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed by accused peti tioner namely, Mridul Barman seeking pre-arrest bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Dispur Police Station Case No. 644 of 2011 under sections 302/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code . The petitioner has been specifically named in the FIR. According to the learned counsel, the offence was committed by other named accused persons and the presen t petitioner had just accompanied them. In this way, the petitioner has admitted the presence of the petitioner at the p lace of occurrence and his company with other accused persons. Besides this, the offence of murder is a serous one and it may require custodial interrogation. Hence, it is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. Accordingly this anticipatory bail application stands rejected.