IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30026 of 2010 YOGENDRA SAHANI @ BHUTTA SAHANI S/o Rambalak Sahani resident of Village Sonepur Mina Bajar P.S. Sonepur Dist. Saran Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR Opposite Party ----------- 02/ 18.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the State. Admittedly petitioner is not named in the FIR but in course of investigation he was put on TI Parade and identified by the informant. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is rotting in jail custody for more than one and half years and the above said TI Parade was conducted after six months of the alleged occurrence. Since the petitioner has been identified by the informant and there is allegation against him of very serious in nature, I do not think it proper to release him on bail particularly considering this aspect of the matter that he carries criminal history also. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. However, learned court below is directed to conclude the trial of the petitioner within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the trial is not concluded within the above stated period, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before the learned court below itself. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J))