7 BHOPA$,(M»‘P’-).g " V - 2‘."?" ,, ‘ 7 _ ‘bgut ‘52 y /o R‘azim, _ hile Polic‘ - ‘ wapara, Di$ti$ Ral gJLQ; ‘ ‘The"stgte “oi-i Médh‘y’a‘ praa‘ Home Throu Départmen't; 'hits SecreLar Go”vt; ag-.1; an 1& /0 Late 1 g Namsw ,$ 34 ccup atic} n , esh: L Vallab _ Bhawan ‘ ’of ‘Maéhya _ ‘ ‘P‘ M ’ The yVsiAiperiniengifent b 'Raipur,’ istrict Office R&ipur, {of (MwP). the _ # ‘ g e L 1 O — pu' I r‘a _ t f D g HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION gS) No. 622 0f2005 : Lakhanlal. APPLICANT VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Stats ofMadhya Pradesh & another. ‘ SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Aw' otrL J. None for the petitioner. Ms. Sunta Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. i Presen: t ORDER gORAL! 07 day of September, 2009) (Passed on The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In View ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sdl- V atish K. Agni‘notn ‘ dge Ju 1. 2. f S