IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.320 of 1985 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.07.2011 Isher Dass and another ...Appellants Versus The Gram Panchayat, Kishenpura, and others ..Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Sandeep Goel, Advocate for respondent No.1. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. A perusal of the paper-book shows that the issue involved in the present case is regarding apportionment of compensation of ` 12,880/-, which has been paid to the Gram Panchayat. The contention raised by the learned counsel for the appellants is that the issue regarding title of the property is pending before the Revenue Authority and decision in the present appeal will affect the same. However, considering the fact that the involved amount in the appeal is small and the same has already been paid to the Gram Panchayat, which must have been spent for the common good in the village, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned award on account of smallness of amount. However, it is made clear that the same will not affect merits of the proceedings, if any, pending before the Revenue Authority regarding title of the property. Dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 06.07.2011 sharmila