A x •*!ii IN THE HIGS GOURT OV cmUTTlSGARH.AT BILASPUR TO-itPetitiohHo.2y3j_/3003^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Smt. Kiran Tripafhi, Wd/o Late Shri Krishna Kumar Tripafhi, aged about 35 years, R/ o C/ o Shiv Kumar Pandey, Sanjay Nagar, Goura Choura Ke Pass, Raipur(C.G.) Versus - 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal WelEare Department, Mantralaya, Shastri Chowk, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The District Education Officer, Raipur(C.O.) 3. The BlockEducation Of6oer, Ganabaad, Raipur (C.O.j,' KSTITOar UNDBK ARTICLE 2^6/32^ OF THE COirSTITUTIOB OF INDIA FOR ISSUASCJ^OF A SUiTAiff^ WRIT. ORDER OR DIRECTIOII TO DO JtrSTICE IV^S^ MATTEat. z :z —Bttuiil^WiaiiisK ffaite M&a k: XI-HC-22 ^'^'siRRFt, '®^ is,hwi'yy- sn^B'^a r<-i 311^1 gmwaf^: l|IW11W< Sff^T iqsra^ M.ji.%ll.l..V. •^ 200-J SII^ITCIWflfOT Shri Pr Shri itjjaiswal leam^d eounsel fsr thc petitiensr'. ir Singh leapned S^ takes notice for respondents. Hsard bsth the counsel. The petitioner has preft i26/Z27 of the CenstSlution of respondents for providing the peWloner. Case of theipstilioner in +l^]l<?t'4tT1 tiW<rtf^ fa^ <I<l^l< ^K siPaH an^r this oetition undsr Ari'iclss Indis seeking a ompassionate appointment to the brief is that the husband of the petitianer was workirg as AssislantTeaeher in Vikas Khand Sar'iyaband and djed en 15.10.99 while KSBffw serviee yide deoth eertificute Annexure P-;t. The pstitjoner] appijed for the; coinpassionete appointment on 15.11.99 vlde ai^nexure P-2.The opplication of the pstitioRer for compasssonate a^ Assis+ant CommissioneF. Tribal W^ ietterdoted 17.5.2 forwarded and recitmmended by th Welfore beparttnenf to the Joint knnexure poinfnien* was forwarded to the ilfapevideAnnexurey-3. Agmnvide P-4) the caac of the pe+i'Moner waa ;o(ninissioner. jbmitted thatthe Sfate Sovepnmeht Counset for the petitioner s( of Chhattisgarh has also form^lated c.~poliey for compassionate appointment vide 4nnexure P~B- He further suDmitted that in spiteof the reeomnienda^ions o'f the Bloek Eduea+ion Offieer/ [I^^By^. "ii rr XI-HC-22 an^T^l R'li.* 3^1 ^^ -afia S!' B' t\- '3^ •A|l'41<'l<<^w:i1<i(lis,?l<lffll«-l^< f^ •H)*ICTI «»*iicu 3n^'"iEra^ !.!.. "g^ 200 3 SfI^I ^tITW'HfOT Having hearf *he csunsel f| faets and-dctaunstanees of the eas^ ^lws/ <ftl^!<;:l1ti1TT JWS^ ^ ^t^s Tf^l^K I? 3lf:aiT311^[. • and the Oeputy Coinmissioner, Tpife^l Welfare &epaptment, nothing has seen dona so far by the authoriti^ learned ceunsel for rte petitioner squarely coyered by the guidelines Chhattisgorhissued on 10.6.2003. !. It is olso the submisslon of the that the case of the petitioner is issued by the State Soveminent sf sr the parties ond eonsidered thc .. I om of the OBiriion that it wiii be ys from today. On receipt ofl Sidsr the setr ietittttner the respondent shall con^i sssued gyidelines ofi+he State of | spe.aMng order w!th rega'fd •rt ^he rsquest of the petltioner for compassionate appointment. Ord•dered accopairigiy. Wr n srands dis; appropriate to di'snt the pstjtlone^ to the r'esponderit No.l for" eomp^ssienate flppaintment within -Htir^y the repcesentatiori filerf by t-he y posees OT Sd/- I-.C. Bhadoo Judge ^' <n [1ft^ ^ta^ Ji