C.W.P.No. 6885 of 2010. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P.No. 6885 of 2010. Date of Decision: 11.5.2010. Balraj Singh Rathee -----Petitioner. VERSUS Union of India and others. ---Respondents. CORAM : HON'BLE Mr. JUSTCE K.KANNAN. Present:- Petitioner in person. Mr.D.S.Bishnoi, Advocate, for UOI. 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? K.KANNAN,J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would be satisfied if legal notices (Annexures P-4 and P-5) served upon the respondents are considered in the light of sanction letter dated 20.3.2010 (Annexure P-6) by respondent No.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner C.W.P.No. 6885 of 2010. 2 further states that he is ready with the demand draft and respondent No.3 has only to release the order of the vehicle in his favour. The representation shall be decided by respondent no.3 within a period of one week from the date of receipt of copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. 11.5.2010 ( K.KANNAN) Anoop JUDGE