THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CONTEMPT CASE No.1021 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners approached this Court and filed the present Contempt Case with the following prayer: - “That the Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for flouting the orders of this Hon’ble Court passed by his Lordship Sri Justice B.Sudershan Reddy in W.P.No.597 of 1999 dated 29.10.1999, which was finalized after dismissal of W.A.No.1183 of 2001, dated 04.09.2008.” This Court allowed W.P.No.597 of 1999 by its order, dated 29.10.1999 and the operative portion of said order reads as under: - “For the aforesaid reasons, the impugned orders dated 25.07.1998 are set aside and the respondents are now directed to consider the cases of the petitioners afresh in the light of the observations made in this order for the post of Mazdoor. The respondents are directed to verify the particular furnished by the petitioners about their working under the contractor. The respondents shall not reject the cases of the petitioners only on the ground that they were not on rolls on 18.05.1997. The cases of the petitioners are required to be considered strictly in the light of the conditions stipulated in B.P.Ms.No.37 dated 18.05.1997. However, the petitioners have to satisfy the requirements as provided for in B.P.Ms.No.36 and 37 dated 18.05.1997. There shall be an order accordingly directing the respondents to reconsider the cases of the petitioners within four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” Subsequently the respondents filed Writ Appeal being Writ Appeal No.1183 of 2001, wherein the orders passed in the said writ petition were confirmed by a Division Bench of this Court, by the judgment, dated 24.09.2008. As the order, dated 29.10.1999, passed in W.P.No.597 of 1999 by a learned single Judge of this Court, as was confirmed by a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.1183 of 2001 by its judgment, dated 14.09.2008, was not implemented, the present Contempt Case has been filed. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by learned Standing Counsel for A.P.Genco that as per the orders of this Court, the cases of the petitioners were reconsidered by the respondents and that they have passed an order dated 09.07.2009 rejecting the cases of the petitioners. In the light of the said orders passed by the respondents, this Court is of the view that no orders need be passed in the present Contempt Case. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. However, if the petitioners have any grievance as regards the said order dated 09.07.2009 passed by the respondents, they may approach an appropriate forum questioning the same. ___________________________________ JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA 29th October 2010 dr