CR No.3638 of 2009 (O & M) ::1:: and CR No.3639 of 2009 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 23.03.2010 (1) CR No.3638 of 2009 (O & M) Yash Pal Sood and another .. Petitioners Versus Davinder Singh and others .. Respondents (2) CR No.3639 of 2009 (O & M) Yash Pal Sood and another .. Petitioners Versus Davinder Singh and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI a). Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? b). To be referred to the Reporters or not ? c). Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? . . . Present:- Mr.Sunil Chadha, Advocate for the petitioners Mr.Amit Rawal, Advocate for the respondent No.1 . . . After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that he would be satisfied if Trial Court is directed to dispose of the main case within any reasonable time since the main case has been lingering for almost 20 years. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to this course of action. CR No.3638 of 2009 (O & M) ::2:: and CR No.3639 of 2009 (O & M) Consequently, these Civil Revisions as well as Civil Miscellaneous Application, if any, are disposed of with the direction to learned Trial Court to decide the main controversy between the parties within a period of 6 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Since the main revision has been decided, the order dated 06.07.2009 has come to an end and consequently, petitioner is at liberty to withdraw the money he has deposited in consequence of that order. March 23, 2010 (AJAY TEWARI) Sukhpreet JUDGE