IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 33547 of 1997 Between: B.Neelavathi d/o Thirupal Ananthapur ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Govt of A.P. rep. by its Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 Spl. Commissioner & Director of municipal Admn. Hyderabad, A.P. 3 Regional cum Appellate Commissioner of Municipal Admn., Anathapur 4 Commissioner, Ananthapur Municipality Anathapur 5 M.Abdul qhayum, Ananthapur Municipality Anathapur 6 A.P. Administrative Tribunal, rep. Registrar Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more in the nature of mandamus declaring that the petitioner is entitled for promotion/appointment by transfer to the post of junior asst. strictly in conformity with rules 9 and 10 of the A.P. Municipal Ministerial Subordinate Service Rules issued in G.O.MS.NO. 292 MA., DT.16/5/92 readwith G.O.Rt. No. 723 ma, dt. 15/9/97 with all consequential benefits if necessary by setting a side the judgment in O.A.No. 3022/96 dt. 31/7/97. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.LINGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER : (Per Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) The petitioner herein was the 7th respondent in the connected W.P.No.18173 of 1997, which was disposed by order, dated 6.9.2007 with certain directions. Following the aforesaid order of this Court in W.P.No.18173 of 1997, dated 6.9.2007, this writ petition is also disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner herein to make appropriate representation to the Commissioner, Anantapur Municipality, Anantapur, seeking appropriate relief, if she so desires, still she is working and the same may be considered in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. _________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J. 22.7.2009 kpr