IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.9862 of 2009 Between: D.Amitha ..... Petitioner AND The Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education dept., Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and 2 others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms.S.Parineeta for Mr.V.R.Reddy Kovvuri Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP for Education Counsel for respondent No.3: --- The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the provision of 25% weightage to the marks secured in relevant group subjects namely Biology, Physics, Chemistry of the Intermediate Public Examinations in GO Ms. NO. 8, Higher Education (EC.II) Department, dated 27-1- 2009, issued by the 1st respondent and the instruction/condition No. XI 2 (a) Annexure IV of instruction Booklet of the 3rd respondent, as arbitrary, illegal, irrational, colourable exercise of power and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14 and 19 of the constitution of India and consequently set aside the same.” At the hearing, Ms.S.Parineeta, learned Counsel, representing Sri V.R.Reddy Kovvuri, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause of the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.12799 of 2009, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 29th June, 2011 lur