[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2596 OF 2008 Shri.Dilip Pandurang Kakad ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Shriram S.Kulkarni Advocate for Applicant Mr.K.V.Saste APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : AUGUST 13, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 13, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 13, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in CR No.125 of 2008 of Satpur Police Station, Dist.Nasik. The said case is mainly under Section 392 of IPC. 3. The case of the complainant is that applicant along with 11 other accused persons assaulted him by fist and kick blows and the accused persons robbed the watch, chain and cash of the complainant. The further case of the complainant [-2-] is that the present applicant assaulted the complainant with wooden log. The incident has arisen out of union rivalry. The incident has occurred on 6.6.2008, however, complaint came to be lodged on 25.6.2008. The delay in lodging the FIR raises considerable doubt in the mind regarding veracity of the complainant. I have perused the medical certificate of the complainant. The certificate does not show that any of the injuries was grievous or serious in nature. Looking to the above facts, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail. 4. In the event of arrest, the applicant-Dilip Pandurang Kakad be released on bail in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rs.twenty five thousand only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant shall report to Satpur Police Station, once in a week till filing of the charge sheet and thereafter once in a month till conclusion of the trial. 5. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]