CRM No. M 27886 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 27886 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.05.2011 Jagjit Kaur ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Naresh Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner Ms Gurveen H Singh, Addl. A G Punjab for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of direction to the respondents to take prompt action in furtherance to the statement dated 15.09.2010 (DDR No. 28 dated 15.09.2010) (P1) and representation/complaint dated 17.09.2010 (P3) and register FIR under Section 498-A, 406, 323, 324, 506, 148, 149 and other provisions of Indian Penal Code against the accused persons at Police Station Morinda, District Ropar. Reply has been filed by the State. As per the said reply, FIR No. 186 dated 15.10.2010 under Section 323, 498-A IPC, P S Morinda was CRM No. M 27886 of 2010 (O&M) 2 registered against Sukhjinder Singh and he was arrested and produced before the Illaqa Magistrate and at the instance of Jagjit Kaur, in her presence as well as other relations, dowry articles were brought from in- laws family of Jagjit Kaur by the Investigating Officer . Accordingly, the present petition is rendered infructuous and dismissed as such. CRM 1445 of 2011 Since the main petition stands infructuous, no order can be passed in the application CRM 1445 of 2011, moved by the petitioner. However, the petitioner is at liberty to avail of alternative remedy, if any, and in accordance with law. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 18.05.2011 mohan