IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35390 of 2010 SUSHIL RAI, SON OF RAMJEE RAIL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BASANT CHAK, P.S.-PHULWARI, DISTRICT-PATNA. ….Petitioner. Versus STATEN OF BIHAR ----------- 3 27.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No.280 of 2009 for the offence under Sections 302,307 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act, has prayed for grant of bail. In the present case informant had alleged that nine accused persons on different motorcycle had come and killed her son. In the said occurrence, indiscriminate firing was made and besides son of the informant, one another person also sustained firearm injuries. The son of the informant died on the spot. The informant had alleged that since her son Chunhu Sharma @ Sanjay Sharma was an eye witness and injured in a case relating to murder of one Satya Narayan Singh he was killed in a deep rooted conspiracy. The informant has alleged that one Ritlal Yadav and Uday Yadav from inside jail hatched conspiracy for killing the son of the informant. During the investigation name of the petitioner has surfaced and, thereafter, the petitioner was remanded in this case on 4.5.2010 from Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No.163 of 2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s name has come in supplementary case diary and, as such, the 2 petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. Keeping in view the seriousness of accusation, the court is not inclined to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. PN ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)