IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.18428 of 2002 Between: Chandana Industries, Rep by its Prop K.R.Laxminaryana, S/o Ramaiah, Ravindranagar, Nalgonda Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND The Commissioner, Miryalaguda Municipality, Mirayalaguda, Nalgonda Dist. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in calling tenders only from reputed companies to supply the electronic items manufactured by the Bajaj, Crompton, Philips as illegal, arbitrary & contrary to Rule 14-A of the A.P. Municipalities Tender Rules 1967 & the instructions issued by the Govt. from time to time & consequently direct the respondents to issue the tender schedules to the petitioner and consider the tender schedule submitted by the petitioner along with other tenderers & with due regard to Rule 14-A of the A.P. Municipalities Tender Rules 1967. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: MR.K.HARINATH & Mr. S.S. PRASAD The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. _______________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 01.07.2005 Nsr ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Commissioner, Miryalaguda Municipality, Mirayalaguda, Nalgonda Dist. 2 2 CD copies