IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 6680 of 2008 Decided on : 03-12-2008 Dinesh ....Petitioner VERSUS The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhiwani ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr. Anil Ghanghas, Advocate for the petitioner. MAHESH GROVER, J After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the observations of the Apex Court at P-2, I am of the considered opinion that it is the owner of the vehicle who has to furnish a surety for satisfying the claim by the Insurance Company against him. For the said purpose, the Executing Court also has a power of ordering attachment of the offending vehicle but under no circumstances the amount of the compensation can be withheld from the claimants. Accordingly, it is directed that the amount which has been deposited in the shape of FDRs be released to the petitioner forthwith. Disposed of. December 3 , 2008 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge