IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2010 / 12TH SRAVANA 1932 CRP.NO. 411 OF 2010() --------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 17/05/2010 IN EA 399/2010 IN OS.67/1957 OF II ADDL.M.C.,NEYYATTINKARA .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): 3RD PARTY ------------------------------------------- MANALTHEERAM AYURVEDA HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE PVT.LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, CHOWARA, KOTTUKAL, NEYYATTINKARA. BY ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER & COUNTER PETITIONERS -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BINU KRISHNAN, S/O.KRISHNAN NADAR, CHARIVUVILA PUTHAN BUNGLOW, CHOWARA, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 2. CHELLAPPAN PILLAI, S/O.MATHEVAN PILLAI, MANALUVILA PUTHAN VEEDU ALSO HAVING PUNNAKKULATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 3. VELAYUDHAN NAIR, S/O.NEELAKANTA PILLAI, THEKKETHENGUVILA VEEDU, ALSO HAVING PUNNAKULATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 4. KOCHAPPY NADAR, S/O.UMMINI NADAR, THANNI NINNA KUZHIYAMVILA PURAYIDOM, CHOWARA, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 5. AYYAPPAN PILLAI, S/O.KRISHNAPILLAI, KARAVILAKATHU VEEDU HAVING ALSO PUNNAKKULATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 6. AYYAPPAN PILLAI, S/O.KRISHNAPILLAI, KARAVILAKATHU VEEDU HAVING ALSO PUNNAKKULATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL DESOM, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 7. SANKARA PILLAI, S/O.MADHEVAN PILLAI, PANDARAVILAKATHU VEEDU,HAVING ALSO PUNNAKKULATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL DESOM, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 8. AYYAPPAN PILLAI, S/O.PADMANABHA PILLAI, AYANIVILA PUTHAN VEEDU, HAVING ALSO PUNNAKKULATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 9. RAMAN PILLAI, S/O.KRISHNA PILLAI, PANDARAVILA PULLARAVILAKATHU VEEDU, HAVING ALSO PUNNAKKULATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 10. SADASIVAN PILLAI, S/O.SIVAN PILLAI, M.S.BUNGLOW, PUNNAKULAM, KOTTUKAL DESOM, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 11. SANKARA PILLAI, S/O.VELAYUDHA PILLAI, KEEZHEMOYATHOTTATHU VEEDU, HAVING ALSO PUNNAKKULATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 12. RADHAMMA PILLAI, D/O.KAMALAMMA PILLAI, PALLIVILAKATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 13. VALSALA, D/O.RADHAMMA PILLAI, PALLIVILAKATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 14. VENU, S/O.VELAYUDHAN NAIR, PALLIVILAKATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 15. MURALI, S/O.VELAYUDHAN NAIR, PALLIVILAKATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 16. VANAJAM, D/O.RADHAMMA PILLAI, PALLIVILAKATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 17. MURUGAN, S/O.VELAYUDHAN NAIR, PALLIVILAKATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 18. KESAVAN NADAR, S/O.KOCHAPPY NADAR, THANNININNAKUZHIYAN VILA PURAYIDOM, CHOWARA, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 19. KRISHNAN NADAR, S/O.KOCHAPPY NADAR, THANNININNAKUZHIYAN VILA PURAYIDOM, CHOWARA, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 20. SIVA SANKARA PILLAI, S/O.RAMAN PILLAI, PANDARAVILA PULLARAVILAKATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 21. AYYAPPAN PILLAI, S/O.RAMAN PILLAI, CALLED AS CHELLAPPAN PILLAI, PANDARAVILA PULLARAVILAKATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 22. MANIKANTAN NAIR, S/O.SIVASANKARA PILLAI, PANDARAVILA PULLARAVILAKATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 23. KARTHI PILLAI, D/O.KALYANI PILLAI, PANDARAVILA PULLARAVILAKATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 24. PARAMESWARAN PILLAI, S/O.RAMAN PILLAI, PANDARAVILA PULLARAVILAKATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 25. KAMALAMMA PILLAI, D/O.KALYANI PILLAI, PANDARAVILA PULLARAVILAKATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 26. OMANAMMA, D/O.KALYANI PILLAI, PANDARAVILA PULLARAVILAKATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 27. KALYANI PILLAI, D/O.KALIYAMMA PILLAI, PANDARAVILA PULLARAVILAKATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. 28. PONNAMMA PILLAI, D/O.JANAKI PILLAI, KOYITHOTTATHU VEEDU, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J. ==================================== C.R.P. No.411 of 2010 ==================================== Dated this the 03rd day of August, 2010 O R D E R Petitioner is a non-party to the suit- O.S. No.67 of 1957 of the court of learned Additional Munsiff-II, Neyyattinkara and E.P.No.80/1979 by which the decree in that case is being executed. Petitioner claimed to be an assignee of jenm right of a portion of the property from the petitioner in E.A.No.399 of 2010 and claimed to have acquired mortgage right in the said property. He filed E.A.No.963 of 2010 requesting the executing court not to physically evict him from the property in his possession in execution of the decree. Grievance of petitioner is that executing court has not considered that application for the reason that E.A.No.399 of 2010 filed by his assignor has already been disposed of by that court. Learned counsel contends that notwithstanding the disposal of E.A.No.399 of 2010 petitioner is entitled to maintain E.A.No.963 of 2010. Various points are raised in support of C.R.P. No.411 of 2010 -: 2 :- that contention. 2. Even as per the submission of learned counsel, executing court has not disposed of E.A.963 of 2010. Since that application has already been filed, the same is required to be disposed of. The executing court is therefore, directed to dispose of E.A.963 of 2010 if steps on that application are complete, as provided under law. Civil Revision Petition is disposed of accordingly. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. vsv