IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25413 of 2011 Vinod Chopra son of late B.N. Chopra, Managing Director Inter Airwing Hotel Janpath Connaught Place, New Delhi, presently residing at C/5-22, S.D.A, New Delhi …….Petitioner. Versus 1.The State Of Bihar Mr. Barry Hancock son of not known to the petitioner, claiming himself being authorized representative of M/s Lombard North Central PLC U.K. and M/s B.R. International Unit 10, English Business Park, English Close, Hove , East Sussex BN 3 IEE ……Opposite Party. ---------------------------------- 2 24.10.2011 A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. And taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. There is no need to notice to O.P. no.2 as on an earlier stage having his presence in Cr. Misc. No. 12079 of 2007 which was filed on behalf of accused Ravi Talwar cognizance was quashed vide order dated 14.9.2011. The allegation as per complaint happens to be so levelled by complainant claiming himself to be authorized representative of M/S Lombard North Central PLC, UK one Anis Bir purchase one car of Model Bentley, Turbo after getting financial support from M/s Lombard North Central PLC and initially paid installment but later on escaped and come to India along with car which was sold to Ravi Talwar and during said course, there happens to be an allegation against the petitioner to have acted as middle man. Because of the fact that cognizance against the accused Ravi Talwar stood quashed by the Hon’ble Court vide 2 Cr. Misc. No. 12079 of 2007, therefore, the cognizance against the petitioner is also bound to be set aside. Accordingly it is set aside. The petition is allowed. M.Rahman (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)