1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.380 OF 2009 L & T Finance Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. M/s. Athithi Gokul Roadlines & Ors. ...Respondents. Ms. Shakuntala Joshi i/by M/s. S.I. Joshi & Co. for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 15TH JULY, 2009. P.C.- 1. Though served twice, none appeared for the Respondents. The claim is of more than Rs.43 lacs. The averments made in the Petition remained uncontroverted including the claims and the apprehension so expressed as movable properties are involved. Therefore, to avoid further damage and further complications in the matter and as the case is made out, it is just and convenient to grant this Petition in terms of prayer clause (a). Having once granted prayer clause (a), I see there is nothing survives in this Petition, however, liberty is granted to the Respondents to approach and settle the matter and or furnish the security to the extent of amount involved. The liberty is also granted to take appropriate pleas or defences before the Arbitral Tribunal, if any. 2. Resultantly, the Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)