IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23602 of 2008 JUMMAN @ HAROON RASHID @ MD.JUMMAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SHAKILA KHATOON ----------- 3. 21.10.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel appearing for Opposite party no. 2. . The petitioner, who is the husband, apprehends arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance is stated to have been taken under Section 498 A of the Penal Code only. While submitting the absence of any heinous or serious allegation, it is stated that he is unconditionally ready to revive the matrimonial harmony. The submission on behalf of Opposite party no. 2 is also to revive matrimonial harmony. In between is the ego of the parties. This Court, therefore, considers it proper to direct that the petitioner, abovenamed shall surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail for a period of three months on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D..J.M., Sikrahana at Motihari in Complaint case No. 325-C/2007. If during this period of three months based on subsequent developments, the petitioner presents himself physically and surrenders to the jurisdiction, the court below shall not be inhibited in considering his application for regular bail in light of the limited - 2 - duration of the anticipatory bail. The future of the petitioner and Opposite party no. 2 now rests in their hands. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)