AB 736/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Heard Shri B Kalita, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Shri B S Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State o f Assam. The Case Diary has not been produced despite requisition. This application U/S 438 CrPC has been filed by the petitioner N os. 1, 2 and 3, namely, Sri Ramen Chetia, Sri Mahananda Konwar and Sri Magadh Ko nwar, respectively, praying for anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in c onnection with Dhakuakhana PS Case No. 12 of 2011 under Sections 436/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioners is that they have destroy ed the thatched house belonging to the informant which was used for weekly marke t. Sri Kalita, learned Senior Counsel submitted that admittedly, th e house was not used for residential purpose. Having regard to the nature of allegations, I am of the view tha t custodial interrogation of the petitioners may not be necessary. Hence, the ba il prayer is accepted. Accordingly, the Investigating Officer is directed to release th e petitioners aforesaid, in connection with the aforesaid PS Case, on bail, on t heir furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10, 000/-, each, with one surety each of the l ike amount subject to his satisfaction. The petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer wi thin a period of 2 (two) weeks from today and they shall co-operate in the inves tigation. With the aforesaid directions, this Anticipatory Bail Applicatio n stands disposed of.