Wp 581.11 1 IN THE HICH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.581/2011 Miss Sheetal Sureshchandra Acharya Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. Respondents Mr.V.Mishra i/b V.Mishra and Co.for petitioner Jasbir Saluja,AGP for Res.1 Adv.H.C.Mehta i/b Mehta & Co.for Res.4 & 5 Ms.Geeta Joglekar for res.2 & 3 CORAM- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATE 19th April,2011 P.C. . This is second Writ Petition for the same relief . The first Writ Petition filed by the petitioner being Writ Petition no.98/2010, was allowed to be withdrawn vide order dated 14/7/2010 with liberty to adopt appropriate remedy. Counsel for the petitioner submits that at that time it was felt that the petitioner can take recourse before the Grievance Committee . However, it now appears that no Grievance Committee is available before whom the petitioner can pursue his remedy. Further, the school in which the petitioner was appointed on the post of Shikshak Sevak is not governed by the provisions of MEPS Rules . In that sense, even remedy under section 9 of the M.E.P.S.Act is unavailable to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner has once again approached this Court by Wp 581.11 2 way of present Writ Petition which, according to him ,is the only appropriate remedy. For the time being, we would only observe that successive Writ Petition filed for the same relief by the petitioner cannot be entertained. Realising this predicament, counsel for the petitioner submits on instructions that he may be granted liberty to move the same Bench for review of the order dated 14/7/2010 and for restoration of Writ Petition no. 98/2010 to be heard on merits . We have no difficulty in acceding to this request of the petitioner. The present petition is,therefore, disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to apply for review of order dated 14/7/2010. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR ,J.)