1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9811/2008 (Shan Mohammed Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of order :: 15.12.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.Vijay Jain, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The impugned order dated 29.09.2008 (Annexure-4) was passed against the original allottee Pappi son of Makhan Singh, who was said to be owner of plot No.B-19/2. The contention of petitioner is that vide an agreement dated 04.09.2008 (Annexure-2), petitioner has purchased the said plot from subsequent purchaser Mohd. Tufel. The claim of petitioner is that the District Collector has passed the impugned order without giving any notice or without affording proper opportunity of hearing to him. I am unable to understand how petitioner has locus standi in the matter to challenge the order passed against the original allottee Pappi S/o Makhan 2 Singh. The claim of petitioner is that vide Annexure- 2 dated 04.09.2008, he has purchased the said plot from Mohd. Tufel who has purchased the said plot from original allottee Pappi and all these facts have not been brought to the notice of the District Collector. In this view of the matter, I am of the opinion that there is no right created in favour of petitioner on the basis of an agreement which is said to be executed by Pappi in favour of the petitioner because Pappi was original allottee in whose favour without following the procedure of law the patta was issued. Accordingly, no case for interference by this Court is made out. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. A.K. Chouhan/- A.K. Chouhan/-