IN THE mGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. AT - BH.ASPUR (C.G.) W.P. No. -^^ OF 2006 PETITIONER M.K.PRUTm, AGED-51YEARS SON OF SHIR S. K. PRUTffl WORKING AS - INCHARGE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, AT - MAHASAMUND, R/OG-33,OPPOSITE ZILA PANCHAYAT, MAHASAMUND, DISTT. - MAHASAMUND (C. G.) RESPONDENTS 1. VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH - THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR SHMA.B.DUBEY, THE DIRECTOR, PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, CHHATTISGARH, RAIPUR WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ..•••" c>a,'?i-"\^>.'..••• .^"^" XI-HC-22 T^ -SiltllC]ii, ,»Tll'MII6, ^...Ejd.p;..lt00. <2_&'&£ ail^l^f h-fM SD^I stitii'b'gf^t 'r^ ^ ^ >I\ SIR%'^snsre'Hf??( Shri R.K. Kesharwani; counsel fc(r the peti Miss Dipali Pandey, Panel Lav^r for the State./respondent No.1 Heai the counsel. Sy this v/rit petition, the petltion and correctness ofthe orders Annexun lacea in these annexures i.e.- he was appoint Petition No.4411/2004 in vfhich he wa; reply of the said petition which ultimste to appear before the Court, Learoed counsei for th& petitic|ner submitte'd. that there was no negligence on the part 'of the petitioner of District'Education Officer on 4-10-2(p05, thereafter, he was summoned by the A.G. Office for 3 times but the re|3iy couid not be filed by the officer- in-charge, -as the officer-in-charge w; Petition No.4182/2004 and ifwas said 1 iled only after fEling of thewrit petition i*| ^F^T^ "RW^ff T|'fe^t •^ail^n 3ii^i ^r has questioned iegallty, vaiidity iS-P/1 Si P/2 whereby the petiiioner accounf of misconduct mentioned ed as Officer-in-Charge in the Writ • negligent in ensuring filing of the ly forced the Director of Education The petitloner joined on t'ne post ts not appomted jn.another Writ hat reply in this writ petition wii'i be io.4182/2 These are the disputed facts. Tiie petitioner is requsred to fiie repiy of the charge sheet Issued to him and rep!y. Afterfiiing reply, the Enquiry Ofl and 'shali pass the order in accordan| enquiiy at the eariiest, but nqt later thaiti 6 months from today. !n view ofthe abo"e, the writ peiftion js disposed of. -• Consequentiy, M.(W.)P. No.148$/2006 aiso stands dis'posed of. Parties are entitled for certified |he can raise ail these points in the licer shali consider all those repiies ;e with iaw and tr/ to dispose of opy ofthis ordef y Sdi- L.C. Bhadoo Judge