IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.: 4375 of 2008. Decided on: 04.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ Sumitra Devi. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondent No.1 to 3. Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.4. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to subsequent developments. Consequently, the same is dismissed as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 04, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?