IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5958 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.10.2009 Rajinder Kumar .....Petitioner versus Kaushalya Devi .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Mukesh Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 30.9.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Karnal, whereby evidence of the petitioner-tenant has been closed by the order of the Court. It is contended that the petitioner-tenant could not bring all the witnesses on 13.9.2009 as his counsel was bed ridden on account of slip- disc. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the fact that issuance of notice of motion would further delay the proceedings as the case is now fixed for 16.10.2009 before the Rent Controller, Karnal, this revision petition is allowed and the Rent C.R. No.5958 of 2009 (O&M) 2 Controller, Karnal is directed that if the petitioner produces all the witnesses on the date fixed i.e. 16.10.2009, let their statements be recorded on that day subject to further payment of costs of Rs.2000/-, by the petitioner to the respondent. Let a copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the petitioner under the signatures of the Bench Secretary of the Court on payment of usual charges of dasti fee. 15-10-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE