IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9075 of 2011 SONU CHAUBEY . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 03 30.03.2011 Heard both sides. This is a repeat application seeking anticipatory bail. Earlier petitioner along with his father had moved this Court for anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. no. 37150 of 2009 which was considered and disposed of by order dated 19.11.2009 whereby petitioner no.2, namely Ram Ashish Chaube ( father of the petitioner) was privileged with bail whereas prayer for bail made on behalf of the petitioner was rejected. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that earlier to filing of complaint the petitioner being husband of the victim had lodged a proceeding under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act vide Matrimonial case no. 86 of 2008, which was ultimately decreed on 10.12.2010 (Annexure-2). In my view, the aforesaid submission is not sufficient enough to entertain the present second anticipatory application for bail keeping in view the fact that his prayer for anticipatory bail was refused on 19.11.2009, and petitioner did not submit to the jurisdiction of the Court. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. However, this Court observes that if the petitioner surrenders in the Court below and applies for regular bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of on its own merit uninfluenced by the present order. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)