IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1218 of 2007 RAM VILASH RAI @ DHANAI RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02/ 25-09-2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The alleged occurrence took place in between the 13.12.93 to 4.1.94. The Complaint was filed in the court on 24.1.94. It appears that the same was sent to the Police for registration and investigation. The Police investigated the case and submitted chargesheet. It further appears that on 27.3.98 the charges were framed under Sections 420, 468, 419 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Thereafter the prosecution was directed to produce the witnesses. The evidence was closed in the year 2007. During the period of nine years the prosecution examined only three witnesses. The informant was, however, not examined in the case. It appears from the allegation that informant was the most important witness in the case. The trial court by well reasoned order has acquitted the accused persons. I find no illegality in the judgment of the trial court. In the circumstances this application is dismissed. S.Sb/- (Madhavendra Saran, J.)