1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION rpa COMPANY PETITION NO. 354 OF 2000 In the matter of Section 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956; M/s. C.G. R & Company .. Petitioners. v/s. Good Value Marketing Co. Ltd. .. Respondents. .... None present. .... CORAM : S. J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 24, 2010. P.C. The learned Advocate for the Petitioners has expired. In view thereof, by an order dated 26th November, 2009, office was directed to issue notice to the Petitioners calling upon them to make such alternate arrangements as the Petitioners may consider appropriate. However, the notice was returned with an endorsement "left/closed". 2. In view thereof, by an order dated 7th January, 2010, 2 office was directed to make one more attempt of issuing and serving fresh notice to the Petitioners informing them that the matter is placed before this Court on 9th February, 2010, and if they fail to appear before this Court on 9th February, 2010, this Court shall dismiss the matter. The office report shows that the packet containing the second notice was also received back with a remark that "the said company does not exist at the given address". 3. In view thereof the Company Petition stands dismissed. [ S. J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]