IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 483 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Rajesh Singh s/o Sri Bihari Lal 2. Smt. Bhajni Devi w/o Bihari Lal 3. Sushil Kumar s/o Bihari Lal All r/o Village Tanda Mansingh, Police Station – Biharigarh, District Saharanpur, U.P. …………. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Superintendent of Police, Haridwar 2. Station Officer, Police Station Ranipur, District Haridwar. 3. Smt. Gurjeev Kaur @ Pinky w/o Rajesh Singh, D/o Shyam Lal r/o at present village Hazara Tongia, Police Station Ranipur, District Haridwar ………….. Respondents ………… Sri Parikshait Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri H.C. Pande, A.G.A. for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no.3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Sri Parikshait Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri H.C. Pande, A.G.A. for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no.3. 2. Sri Pande, the learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners- Rajesh Singh, Smt. Bhajni Devi and Sushil Kumar seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them now has become infructuous as the police after the completion of the investigation has filed charge-sheet against the petitioners before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 27.04.2006 stands vacated automatically. 5. With the above order, CLMA No. 4976 of 2006 also stands disposed of. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 10.07.2006 10.07.2006 A