IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 18.02.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN W.P. NO.24388 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 1.Mrs.Savitha Gupta 2.Mrs.Kiran Gupta .. Petitioners Versus 1.The Secretary, Government of Tamilnadu, Department of Local Administration, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Ribbon Building, Chennai. 3.The Assistant Revenue Officer, Revenue Office, Zone 3, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the file of the third respondent relating to the Notice dated 28.07.2009 in Bill No.1120 in Zone No.03 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to issue a fresh demand notice to the petitioner for assessment made. For Petitioners : Mr.P.Balamurali For Respondents : Mr.R.Murali, (for R1) Government Advocate. Mr.V.Bharathidasan, (for R2 & R3) * * * * * O R D E R https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsels appearing for the respondents. 2.At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, it has been pointed out by Mr.R.Murali, learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the first respondent and Mr.V.Bharathidasan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the second and the third respondents that it is open to the petitioners to file an appeal against the final assessment issued by the respondent Corporation, on 03.11.2009, and received, on 9.12.2009, under Sec.138-G of the Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919, read with the relevant taxation rules. They had also submitted that it is open to the petitioners to raise all the grounds available to them before the Appellate Taxation Tribunal. 3.In such circumstances, it is made clear that it is open to the petitioners to avail the alternate remedy, as provided under the Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919, raising all the available grounds, as per law. If the petitioners choose to file an appeal, they can do so, within 15 days, from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. On such appeal being filed, the Appellate Taxation Tribunal is expected to dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P. is closed. Sd/ Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Secretary, Government of Tamilnadu, Department of Local Administration, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Ribbon Building, Chennai. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The Assistant Revenue Officer, Revenue Office, Zone 3, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai. 4 The Government Pleader High Court, Madras – 104 +1 C.C. to Mr.P.Balamurali, Advocate – SR No.10847 +1 C.C. to Mr.V.Bharathidasan, Advocate – SR No.11560 W.P. NO.24388 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 18.02.2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/