IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 9739/2008 Decided on:8.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Chain Lal. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. K.S. Banyal, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. ____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that though he has completed requisite number of years, he has not been considered for regularization. It has come in the mandays’ chart that the petitioner had started working with effect from 1995 but had completed 160 days in each calendar year with effect from 1996 till 2001. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 2. Mr. K.S. Banyal submitted at the Bar that his client is still working with the respondents and has completed 160 days with effect from 2002 onwards. 3. In view of this, case of the petitioner is directed to be considered for regularization after completion of requisite number of years. Petitioner is held entitled to all the consequential benefits. Needful be done within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment. 4. In the light of above directions, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 8.12.2010 *awasthi*