IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10666 of 2011-G & connected matters. Decided on: December 12, 2011. 1. CWP No. 10666 of 2011-G. Dwarka Dass Shastri S/o Sh Salig Ram R/o Village Bhalat Post Office Harsour, Tehsil Barsar, District Hamirpur (HP) ……Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Himachal Pradesh through Principal Secretary (Education), Shimla. 2. The Director of Elementary Education to the Govt. of HP, Shimla. 3. The Deputy Director of Elementary Education, Kangra at Dharamshala. …….Respondents. 2. CWP No. 10700 of 2011-J. Kamlesh Kumari w/o Sh Tulsi Ram R/o village and Post Office Bhatoli Phakorian, Tehsil Dehra, District Kangra (HP) ……Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Himachal Pradesh through Principal Secretary (Education), to the Govt. of HP, Shimla. Shimla. 2. The Director of Elementary Education, to the Govt. of HP, Shimla. 3. The Deputy Director of Elementary Education, Kangra at Dharamshala. …….Respondents. 3. CWP No. 10701 of 2011-A. Shiv Kumar S/o Sh Visheshwar Dutt R/o Village Dyal Post Office Nainpukhar, Tehsil Dehra, District Kangra (HP) ……Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Himachal Pradesh through Principal Secretary (Education), Shimla. 2 2. The Director of Elementary Education to the Govt. of HP, Shimla. 3. The Deputy Director of Elementary Education, Kangra at Dharamshala. …….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 4550 of 2010, Ravi Kumar versus State of H.P. & anr. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondents concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment, referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of production of copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition(s) and the copy of the judgment, referred to above. Needless to say, that the eligible consequential benefits shall also be disbursed within the said period. 2. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 12th December, 2011. (Justice Dev Darshan Sud), (vs) Judge.