Rptiffil ^iC.&^'^'1'" © ^. ?• IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Vv'-RIT PETITION N0. 3312- OF 2006 ^ Petitioner:, N.S. Gautam, ....- S/o Shri C.L. Gautam, >-'' ....-Aged about 59 years, ^^.-^^•""'..•^•/oWarehouse Road, E&tl fs ietir>tt ^•:«^ ^^^^.•^ ^W"" ...-••"" Bilaspur, "'<»^S-'""" BUas(ur~Dist. J^ ^- o^'&•• C.G: State. Versus 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur. CG State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT (S). AND/OR ORDER (S) DIRECTIONl'Sl ETC XI-HC-78 *<1*1CTI Sh*1ich 3^''^l'41cl''<, Wtfl^'16, Rlcll+iy .U.P.'^:.^.i.Up£.^ 200 3ll^<?l '<aqi ('iqt3'!"<eT) sn^r^r^iN; HW3l1^TshK APd' K SRt7W(rf^T3n^T mdnths 7.7.2006 Shr-i @.S. Agwwa\, Sr. Adv. Shri Sstish fiupta, Dy. Sovt. p Heard. The main grievance raised b^ the verge of retirement i.e. 9 superannuation, he has bean transf|£ ©overnment. Moreover, the petiti therefore.the tr-ansfer is pr'ejudici^! Leamed counsel for the pe[ allowed to Join at the transferred also be affected. So far the petitioner has therefore, the petitioner is directep cepy of this order before pespond| today raising all his grievances and points raised by the petitibner anej within a pericd of one month fr-offl Till then, if the petitionep 'is not representation is decided. With the direction aforesaid. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.25|3 Certified copy as per rules. |th Shri K.R. Nair, Adv. for the petitioner. ^dv. for the fespondents on advance copy. the petitioner in this petition is that on time is ieft in attaining the age of irred contrcry to the policy of the State 4ner is o heart patient <& ehronic diabetie, to the health of the petitioner. rttioner submits that if the petjtioner is loce i.e. Raipur, then his pension case wil 256 *i'iif<-f4i-( tiiicti'ffrsl<fl <Ri<di< ^sri^iTsn^r t> nbt sent any notice for demand of justice, to first make a representQtion along with :nt No.2 within a period of 10 doys froro in turn, respondent No.2 shafl consider the decide the swne in an objective monner I'he dirte of r-eceipt of the repr-esentation. lelieved, he should not be relieved til! the rte the petitionstands disposedof. 18/06 also stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge .^' <