,5!»«i«siij!"• K! C.^'f-aoL^ y IN THE HISH COURT OF JUbICATURE CHHATTCSGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (5} N0. 5-36^ / 2006 Petitioner ^^/>. ^'z /'./ J°/ -^.A" ^ ^^}'"/ ^i^:' .^~^y /^^' fw'.^/ •.^/y Respondents Versus a. i9 ^' ^-^ ^ oox ^.^^ /2. 'to \ '^^73. <J^ .<c ovy Y4. Smt. Shakun AAanikpuri, W/o Shri Ravi Das Manikpuri, Aged about 44 years. Asst. Teacher, 6ovt. Girls School Bankisight, Block-Khatgora, Dist: Korba-(C.S.) State of Chhatf-isqarh Through - The Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawun, Raipur, Dist; Raipur-fC.G.) District Education Officer, Dist : Korba-(C.©.) Asst. Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Oist: Korba-(C.©.) Block Education Officer, Khatgora, Dist: Korba-(C.6.) ^ WRIT PETETCON UN&ER ARTECLE 226 / 227 OF TI-IE CONSTETUTEON OF IN&IA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT. WRITS, bIRECTEON ETC TQ &OJUSTICEJNTHE MATTER. HI6H COURT OF CHt-IATTESSARH AT BILASPUR W. P.fS)No. 5365 of 2006 Petitioner Respondents Verais Smt. Shakun Manikpuri State of Chhattisgarh &. others And W. P.fS) No. 5375 of 2006 Petitioner ; 5mt. Shashi Prabhc Sonpure Versus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh & others Single Bench: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Shri Anil Singh Rajput, Adwcate for the Petitioners. Shri V.V.5. Moorthy, Dy. Advocate Seneral with Smt. Anju Ahuja, t>y. 6ovt. Advocate for the respondents/State. ORDER i+h (9tn October, 2006) 1. Learned counsel oppearing for the petitioners submit that while working as Assistant Teochers/Upper Oivision Teachers, the petitioners have gone on training to improve their qualifications on their own expenses ond acquired B.Ed./B.T.! Examination Certificate. 2. The present writ petitions, being W.P.(s) Nos. 5365/2006 and 5375/2006 invotve simitair facts and common question of taw. Thus, these petitions are being disposed of by this common order. 3. According to learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners ore entitled to two advcmce increments in view of the decision of <L. n this Court- in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (11) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and onother (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed./B.TJ. Examination Cerl'ificate on his own expenses, are covered by the circular dated 24.12.98 issued by the State Sovernment of Madhya Pradesh. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners furt+ier aibmits tha+ the facts and question of law involved in the present coses are squarely covered by decision of this Court in the caae of Yashwcuit Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), to which leamed counsel appearing for llie respondents fairly concedes ond agrees with the averment made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 5. Accordingty, the writ petitions are allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Gurg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B. Ed./B.T-I. Examination Certificates on their own expenses or not. No order as to costs. 6. A copy of this order be placed on record of one connected writ petition. Subhash Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge [