Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.16972 of 2007 Dated 28th July, 2011 Between: Vasamsetty Ramakrishna Rao and five others. …Petitioners And Government of A.P., reptd by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and three others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Smt P.Vijaya Laxmi for Smt N.Shoba Counsel for respondents : GP for Land Acquisition The Court made the following: Order: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside the notification vide Ref.No.G3/2912/07, dated 14.06.2007, issued by respondent No.2 under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’) in respect of land admeasuring Ac.4-85 cents in Sy.Nos.78, 80, 85/1, 57/2, 71, 78, 80 and 64/1 and 2 of Kakinada Village and Urban Mandal, East Godavari District. At the hearing, Smt P.Vijaya Laxmi, learned counsel representing Smt N.Shobha, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that during the pendency of this writ petition, respondent No.1 has issued G.O.Rt.No.116, Housing (HB-II) Department, dated 18.04.2008, cancelling the acquisition proceedings and that, following the same, cancellation notice in Form No.24 was issued by respondent No.2 on 09.09.2008. Learned counsel for the petitioners placed copies of the said G.O. and Form No.24 before the Court, which are taken on file. In view of the subsequent development, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, the order, dated 09.08.2007, passed by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.21683 of 20027 is vacated and W.V.M.P.No.2563 of 2007 is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 28th July, 2011 DR