THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR Civil Revision Petition No. 380 of 2009 Order: This revision is directed against the order dated 19.01.2009 passed in E.P. No. 90 of 2007 in O.S. No. 820 of 2004 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil judge, Vijayawada. The brief facts of the case are as follows. The respondent herein filed the suit in O.S. No.820 of 2004 for recovery of amount. The petitioner herein is the sole defendant in the said suit. The suit was decreed on 13.03.2006 for the amount of Rs.1,52,830/-. Since the petitioner herein failed to pay the said decretal amount, the respondent herein filed E.P. No.90 of 2007 in O.S. No.820 of 2004, under Order XXI Rules 37 and 38 CPC, seeking arrest of the petitioner and to commit him to civil prison. The petitioner herein filed a counter. Subsequently, the petitioner herein was arrested and produced before the Court below on 01.12.2008. Then he paid Rs.4,000/- and prayed time. He was granted time, but subsequently, he did not pay any amount. As the petitioner herein was absent on 19.01.2009 and there was no representation for him an order of arrest was passed against him. Challenging the same, he filed the present revision. Though, initially, stay was granted by this Court on 30.01.2009, subsequently, this Court passed an order, dated 23.07.2009, directing the petitioner herein to deposit half of the decretal amount with costs within a period of eight weeks from that day and on such deposit, the respondent was permitted to withdraw the same without furnishing any security. It is represented that the petitioner has complied with the said order and now both the counsel agreed that the petitioner herein may be granted three months time to deposit the remaining decretal amount. In that view of the matter, without going into the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the CRP with the following direction. There shall be interim suspension of the impugned order for a period of three (3) months from today to enable the petitioner herein to deposit the balance decretal amount. If the petitioner fails to pay the amount within the period stipulated, this order stands vacated. ___________________ B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J. Date: 12.11.2010 Nsr