1 S.B.Criminal Revision Petition No.784/2007 Likhma Ram v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 21st November, 2007 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. J.S.Choudhary ] Mr. Pradeep Chooudhary] for the petitioner. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor. Mr. Vineet Jain, for the respondents. .... By this petition under Section 397 read with 401 Cr.P.C. a challenge is given to the order dated 25.7.2007 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.2, Bikaner rejecting an application preferred under Section 319 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner. The contention of counsel for the petitioner while assailing validity of the order impugned is that the learned trial court while considering the application over looked the material evidence available on record and also looked into and taken into consideration the material which ought not to have been considered at the stage of deciding the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. I have examined the order impugned and also other relevant documents placed on record on behalf of the petitioner. 2 Learned Additional Sessions Judge while rejecting the present application left it open for the petitioner to file a fresh application after getting the statements of Hemaram and Rampal, as such I do not find any material irregularity or irreparable injustice that may warrant interference of this Court in its revisional jurisdiction. The revision petition, therefore, is dismissed. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. Kkm/ps.