IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated 17.2.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.38531 of 2006 L.Mohanasundaram ... Applicant -Vs.- 1.The Joint Director of School, Education (Services), College Road, DPI Complex, Nungambakkam, Chennai-6. 2.The District Educational Officer, Musiri. ... Respondents Original Application No.6475 of 1999 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench praying to call for the records on the file of the second respondent in his proceedings O.Mu.No.7354/A1/98 dated 3.2.99 and on the file of the first respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.58820/J4/99 dated 19.1.99 and quash the same and direct the respondents to give compassionate appointment to the applicant with effect from the date of application with all monetary and service benefits. Since the Tamilnadu Appellate Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. For petitioner : Mr.R.Singaravelan For respondents : Mr.S.Sivashanmugam, Government Advocate O R D E R Original Application No.6475 of 1999 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench praying to call for the records on the file of the second respondent in his proceedings O.Mu.No.7354/A1/98 dated 3.2.99 and on the file of the first respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.58820/J4/99 dated 19.1.99 and quash the same and direct the respondents to give compassionate appointment to the applicant with effect from the date of application with all monetary and service benefits. Since the Tamilnadu Appellate Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ and numbered as Writ Petition. 2. Petitioner was 29 years old at the time of filing the Original Application in the year 1999. He claims compassionate appointment on the death of his father who died as Secondary Grade teacher on 24.9.1991. The application for appointment on compassionate ground has been made within time. It appears that one authority, the Assistant Elementary Education Officer, Thottiyam has recommended the case, but the claim was rejected by the higher authority, the second respondent stating that the Assistant Elementary Education Officer, Thottiyam has not considered the petitioner's claim in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.560 Labour and Employment dated 3.8.1977. 3. Whatever be the reason, at this point of time, it may not be appropriate to pass orders one way or the other except to direct the petitioner to make a further representation within a month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order to the appropriate authority to consider the claim for appointment on compassionate ground. Such representation shall be considered and disposed off by the authority within two months thereafter on its own merits and in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is disposed off as above. No costs. Sd/- Asst. Registrar //true copy// Sub Asst.Registrar ts To 1.The Joint Director of School, Education (Services), College Road, DPI Complex, Nungambakkam, Chennai-6. 2.The District Educational Officer, Musiri. 1 cc to Mr.R.Singgaravelan, Advocate, Sr.No.10828 1 cc to Government Pleader, Sr.No.11037 Order in W.P.No.38531 of 2006 RSN {CO} TP/8.3.2010. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/