^Sf"~ wS» ..--l<??j:i^- ^ ' > \ ^p \^-^ .w" ^S..'-'"' ^ Cy\sr=> ~^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF_GHHA1T£SGARHAT BILASPUR WRITPETITION(C) No.^^_..^.^2008 SSni PETITIONER RESPONDENTS. 1. v Dayaram Yadav, S/o Shri Shivram Yadav, aged about 40 years, Occupation-Advocate, R/o. Village Kurra Tahsil Kurud Dist. Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretaty/Additional Secretary Law 65 Legislative Affairs Deportment D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Gourt Superintendent Office of District & Sessions Judge, District Court Dbamatari Dist. Dhamatari (C.G.) Ramakant Chandrakar S/o. Laxminarayan Chandrakar, aged about 39 years, practicing Advoeate, R/^o. Village Thuwa, Tahsil Kurud, District Dhamatari (C.G.) Pradeep Kumar Yadav,_ S/o. Shri Kriparam'Yaday, Occi-rpation Advocate, R/0. Village Chhar^, Tahsil Kumd, District Dllarnatan (C.G.) ^L ^V^WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCB OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CEERnORARI, MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUTfABLE WRIT OR WRrTS, DIRECTION OR mRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERES: The petitioner, named aboye begs to submit as under: - •^ 1, PA^TTCULAROFTHEPETITIPNERS: Asmentioned in the cause title above. 2^ PARTICULARSPF^THERESPONDENTS: As mentioned in the cause title above. m ^^ffS^ ::s;^s ^MIGM'iSC>URtiQR..(SMH/®l©C3^1ira;::iBtL^i^^%SggU^ VVRlT'F>ETl1'IONLif®;8 ^49;e)R2QO&i ^ :3 'PEtltlONER.ir'' •-'':::':;':':' ^^ •,Versusl.''..:.:':1..,/ :•: ',' RESRONBENTSI ^^^^^^^ s^ (WritPetition tmderAi1:ic]®22B}o1;lheConstitutiohOflhdia)^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Sirigle;Ben(:^ : Hon^le'Shri Satish.K.AgniM^ ; Present - ^ SMn R.S. Patel;/yvoGate;lQrtHe^^p^ ShriA.S. KactTffawahia,;Dy^dyQeate<3eFtera)fortlTeState. ; Shri K.R. Nair.Advocat&forrespondents N6.3 &4. ^ QR@ER'©RAL): : : i(B^sed:^^his 18th daydfjune, 201 il^li^^ l^^^s ®|l|eU|||ai(^riseag|a|:^^ing^f:^l'':!tlie.:f:,p^ifioner^ ;n®nSiB:i'jj(gffi®|Gi0||S^s^ y;^^greseiitafiQB'::^ :;(AnFie)<yi^"-g^g^g|gg^S^iIS:|a|^i|[ng^^^is':?Retition,';as'^ ys^SS^ 2.: ^ 4. -y Gowri settled^[:n'irifflRle^|gg|^|(H|ggggji^p|S||n^|g|| i^^!i:l^id^|^^ .a,reasonablS^im§ti|:H®^l^lyg^tt3ira|a?p®riciB^SiX;fnBffl s'llajtlToreVs.State'of'IWacl^ya^r^cl^li1^^ :;^::ttljj^st^^,^Shwvl<aGtnRa\«^M,^leaM|;^^|^ 1a|3p^nn^|^<|'ig?®{gitgi.||jb||J:re||%^JSj^ga^ffi^lja||g^^ i';c^ulEl^;h^KB'RS®n^i8iJ^Saifjj|SSaigi98E|aBBiWB8B18E^@l^ tiowewer,sth®l;siani^§fial|£Bei^ l'the)ydate''of ^i^^ipt:'6fa'copy?ofWs^c»xier,:.:'^ In viewctf^h®abo\re submjssion.made byleamecl'isoynsel Spl^ f6rthe State,^iearned wunsel^ that it is^not necessary to aci)udiGatg uppn ttie^^d^ libertyrffaiyBereservedtotheftetifiQnertofilefresh^^l^ ;in..theire|Si'eSentaticjn. :•: :1:.: ::;::' '.-;::' '•:..;.:.: ^^^•'..^•"^..•/'^ ACG£)riaingly,^hewrifrpetitiQnisaispos^ QfwitKthe afc^^ Sd/- Satish K. Agnibotn ^(1989) atSCC 582 s:. u