IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18138 of 2011 Ajay Kumar Singh, Son of Sri Rajendra Singh, Resident of Village and P.O.- Walipur, P.S.- Pipariya, District- Lakhisarai. . . .Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Deputy Development Commissioner, District Village Development Agency, Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai. 2. The Block Development Officer, Pipariya, District- Lakhisarai. 3. The Officer-in-charge, Pipariya P.S., District- Lakhisarai. . . . . . Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2/ 21.12.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make the officer-in-charge, Piparia police station as respondent no.3. In the instant writ application, the petitioner prays for quashing Memo no. 275 dated 10.6.2011, issued under the signature of Block Development Officer, Pipariya, whereby he has been directed to refund a sum of Rs. 3,78,587/- towards the value of 271 quintals of undistributed rice allotted under SGRY Scheme. The petitioner submits that the notice does not show the quantity of rice that was allotted to him. In paragraph 1 of the writ application, the petitioner has stated that he was allotted 702.06 quintals of rice and he has distributed all the rice against issuance of valid permits. Counsel for the State submits that the submission of the petitioner is subject to verification. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 with condition that the petitioner 2 would file a detailed representation before the Block Development Officer, Piparia within a period of six weeks from today, which would be disposed of within a further period of three months. In the meantime, no coercive steps would be taken against the petitioner. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)