IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION (LODG) NO. 1274 OF 2008 PETITION (LODG) NO. 1274 OF 2008 PETITION (LODG) NO. 1274 OF 2008 1. Snehankit Mahila Audyogik Utpadak ] Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit & anr. ] .. Petitioners Versus 1. The Municipal Corporation of Greater] Mumbai & anr. ] .. Respondents Mr. Uday Warunjikar with Nitesh Bhutekar for the petitioners. Mrs. A.R. Joshi for the respondents. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATED: 18TH JUNE, 2008 P.C. : 1. The grievance of the petitioners is that ISCON was given 209 forms and as against that the petitioners were not given as many forms as the petitioners desired in respect of the tender in issue. 2. Now, an Affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Corporation stating that once again, a public notice by way of Corrigendum will be issued in a widely circulated newspaper inviting tenders by extending the date to file the tender by a period of one week. The learned counsel for the respondents further states that the scrutiny of such tenders will be completed within a : 2 : fortnight and that the existing contractors’ period will be extended till the tender process is completed. 3. The learned counsel for the respondents also makes a statement at bar that when the Corrigendum will be published extending the date for submission of tender, each party (tenderer) who comes to collect the tender forms will be given as many tender forms as they want. 4. All the aforesaid statements made in the Affidavit, as also orally before this court, are accepted. 5. In view of the above statements made by the learned counsel for the respondents, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed and the Petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. 6. We hereby record our appreciation of the performance, promptness and assistance which has been rendered to this court in this matter by the learned counsel for the respondents, Mrs. A.R. Joshi (Advocate). : 3 : Sd/- Sd/- [A.A. [A.A. [A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.] KUMBHAKONI, J.] KUMBHAKONI, J.] [S.B. [S.B. [S.B. MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.]