1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1944 OF 2007 Mularj Kabali .. Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.T.N.Subramaniam, Sr.Advocate i/b M/s.Markand Gandhi and Co. for the petitioner Mr.D.A.Nalawade, G.P. for respondent nos.1 and 2 Mr.Prashant Ghelani for respondent nos.3(a) to 3(e) and 8 Ms.Bharati Desai for respondent nos.5(a), 5(b), 6, 7 and 9 Ms.Kiran Bagalia for respondent / MMRDA CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL & & & K.K.TATED, JJ. K.K.TATED, JJ. K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED : 4th August, 2008 DATED : 4th August, 2008 DATED : 4th August, 2008 P.C.: 1. The learned counsel for the parties including the learned A.G.P. on behalf of the State of Maharashtra submits that the parties have worked out the subject matter of the dispute in the petition by arriving at a Consent Terms. The 2 learned counsel for the parties and the learned A.G.P. confirm that the Consent Terms have been read over, explained and understood by the parties and it does not violate any statutory or legal provision which prohibits any such settlement. 2. The parties have also furnished consent minutes of the order signed by all the learned counsel for the parties. We, therefore, take the Consent Terms alongwith the Consent Minutes of Order and mark ’X’ collectively for the purposes of identification. Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Consent Minutes of Order and the Consent Terms. ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( K.K. TATED, J ) ( K.K. TATED, J ) ( K.K. TATED, J )