IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 1020 of 2008 Smt. Gazala Khan W/o Sri Majid Khan ……. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and another ……. Respondent Mr. R.S. Sammal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. R.S. Sammal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. 2. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; contents of the F.I.R.; averments made against the petitioner in the F.I.R.; perusal of the medical report filed by way of supplementary affidavit; and in the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find that the petitioner is entitled to get the reliefs claimed in the writ petition. 3. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed in limine. 4. However, considering the fact that the petitioner being a lady and the nature of offence, I direct that if the petitioner brought before the Magistrate or surrenders before the Court, her bail application shall be disposed of expeditiously without waste of time. 5. I am refraining from commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioner’s case at the trial, which is yet to start. 6. Consequently, the CLMA No. 8674 of 2008 also stands dismissed. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 24.12.2008 Shiv