IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11539 of 2009 Farooque, son of Amin, resident of Village-Khaira Garhiya, Police Station- Narpatganj, District-Araria. ……..Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Md. Aminuddin @ Aminuddin, son of Late Ghafoor Shah, resident of Village- Khaira Garhiya, Police Station- Narpatganj, District-Araria…..Opposite Parties. ----------- 3. 29. 07. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Opposite Parties. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that Opposite Party No. 2 obtained order of anticipatory bail by order dated 06. 03. 09 vide Annexure-1 to this application by not placing the full facts as it was concealed that Opposite Party No. 2 was also a member of the Committee who sanctioned the benefit of Indira Awas Yogna to his son Learned counsel appearing on behalf of Opposite Party No. 2 submits that nothing was suppressed or concealed and even today it is submitted that Indira Awas Yogna sanctioned by the Committee and not by the Opposite Party No.2 himself. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any ground for cancellation of the bail and the petition for cancellation of bail is rejected. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)