1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8473 OF 2010 Kalpana w/o Bhanudas Dhotre .. PETITIONER VERSUS Nilkant Tukaram Dhotre & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. V.D. Gunale, advocate for the petitioner. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 30 th SEPTEMBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Interlocutory order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad during continuance of the revision application in respect of recording of revenue entires is subjected to challenge in this petition. It is not disputed that a revision application raising exception to the revenue entires recorded by the lower authority is subjected to challenge and the same is pending before the Additional Commissioner. 2 It is very clear that the revenue entries are recorded for fiscal purpose and those in themselves are not evidence of title or entitlement of the 2 parties in relation to the properties in dispute. The revenue entries are required to be corrected in accordance with the final adjudication by the revenue authority or any adjudication in respect of title or entitlement of the parties in relation to the properties by the competent civil court. No interference is required to be caused in the petition. Petition is devoid of substance hence stands rejected. However, revisional authority i.e. Additional Commissioner is directed to expeditiously decide the pending revision application preferably within three months from today. 3 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp8473.10.odt