^WIS 8EKC c IQO? n IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(C)No. ^3^>~ /2010 PETITIONER w^ ^^^••^^° ^-"""6S^ RESPONDENTS / Mousami Women's Self I-Ielp Group, Sahanpur, District Surguja, through: its President Smt. Ratna Behra, W/o. Madhav Ram, aged about 75 years, R/o. Gram Panchayat Sahanpur, District Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, ihrougl^ Secretary, Department oIFood, Civil Stipplies & Consumer Protection Dcpartment, D.K. S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Collector (Food), Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Rajpur, District Surguja (C.G.) Food Inspector, Lundra, District Surguja(C.G.) Food Officer, Ambikapur, Distrlct Surguja (C.G.) WR1T PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE ^2] ^3] ^4] CONSTITUTION OF INDIA \\__J^AJ^FLC'-1 y ^^ HIGH COURT OF CHHA'mSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (Q No. 3305 of2010 PETmONER RESPONDENT8 : Mousmi Women's Self Help Group, Sahanpur, District Surguja. VERSUS : State ofClihattisgarh <& Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmmQN OF INDIA SB:Hon'bleShriSatishK.AsmhoM,J. Present: Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDERrORAL) (Passed on 08th day of July, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner submits that the appellate authority is not considermg the application of the petitioner for urgent hearing and thus, a direction may be issued for hearing the mattCT pending before the appellate authority, on urgent basis. 2. On perusal of the papers, it is found tiiat the appellate authority has listed the appeal for hearing on 13 July, 2010 (Aimexure P/l). In vievv ofthat, it is directed that ifthe petitioner makes an application for any interim relief or for urgent hearing, it is expected that the same shall be considered and appropriate orders may be passed tiiereafter, m accordance with law. 3. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ainit