1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1745 OF 2009 1. Rashid Gafoor Multani & anr. ... Petitioners vs. 1. The State of Maharashtra & 5 ors. ... Respondents Mr. Ashok M. Saraogi for the petitioners. [Petitioners present in person.] Mr. G.W. Mattos, AGP, for the respondent Nos.1 and 3. Ms. G.S. Joglekar for the respondent No.2. Mr. Chirag Balsara i/b N. Shah & Himayatullah for the respondents Nos.4 to 6. CORAM : J. N. PATEL & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE : 06TH APRIL, 2010 P.C. : Heard the counsel. 2. After we heard the petition at length on the last date, it was adjourned for seeking instructions. After seeking necessary instructions from the petitioners, who are present in person, Mr. 2 Saraogi, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to make appropriate representation to MHADA in the matter of their right as regards their eligibility. 2. Permitted to withdraw with liberty. In case the petitioners make a representation to the respondent-MHADA within a period of one week, the competent authority would take a decision in the matter after hearing the parties within a period of 6 weeks from the date of first appearance and pass a reasoned order. 3. Petition dismissed as withdrawn. ( J. N. PATEL, J.) ( A.P. BHANGALE, J.)