IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Civil Revision No.3711 of 2009 (O&M) Decided on : August 05, 2009 Jagdish Parshad ... Petitioner VERSUS Naresh Bhadana and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Anil Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N.JINDAL, J.- It was stand of the plaintiff – petitioner in the earlier suit that he is in possession of the portion `ABCD' of the house in dispute, as marked in the site plan attached with the plaint. That said suit was decreed on 4.2.2008. Now, he wants to claim his possession over the whole house. No document has been placed on record to show that he is in possession of the whole house. No grounds to interfere are made out. Dismissed. August 05, 2009 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE