1 rpl59-11 vai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (LODGIND) NO.59 OF 2011 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.105 OF 2011 IN SUIT NO.95 OF 2011 Dr.Prafulla B. Amin ....Petitioner V/s. Dr.Anil B. Amin ....Respondent Mr.Shailesh Shah with Ms.R.A. Shah i/b Mansukhlal Hiralal & Co. for the Petitioner. Dr.Virendra Tulzapurkar, Senior Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Singh and Ms.Shruti Sardesai i/b Ms.Phoenix Legal for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 23RD AUGUST, 2011. P.C. :- 1. The review petitioner seeks a review and modification of the consent order dated 23.2.2011. In effect the review petitioner also invites the Court to interpret and construe the consent order, by which the suit was disposed of. For instance, the review petitioner seeks a clarification as to whether the T.D.S. is payable or not and as to whether the firm stood dissolved as on the date of the consent order or would stand dishonest only upon the execution of all the documents, as contemplated in clause 1(B) of the consent order. 2 rpl59-11 2. These are issues which must be decided in the execution proceedings. The Review Petition is not maintainable in respect of such matters. 3. In the circumstances, the review petition is disposed of with the above clarification.