THE HONBLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.10597 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive. Accordingly, the Wit Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 17.06.2008. Kgr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.10597 of 2008 Between: Y.Srinivasa Reddy S/o Bala Venkata Reddy aged 35 years, R/o.Duruvesi (V) Gadivemula (M) Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Sri Gattu Gopala Swamy Temple Represented by Chairman, Trust Board, Gorakallu Village, Panyam Mandal, Kurnool District. 2 Sri Gattu Gopala Swamy Temple, Represented by its Manager/Exectuive Officer, Gorakallu(V) Panyam (M) Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in proceedings to conduct auction of for the temple land in the possession of the petitioner to an extent of Ac 11-64 in Sy.No.787 and ac 5-45 cents Sy No.788 (in total ac 17-09 cents) which belongs to Sri Gattu Gopala Swamy Temple Gorakallu(V)Panyam(M) Kurnool Dist even through petitioner in possession and enjoyment of the same by paying the lease amount every year and contrary to arbitrary and violative of art 14,19,21 of construction of India and consequently direct the respondents not to disturb and interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the aforesaid temple land by the petitioner by collecting lease amount as paid for earlier years and pass such other order or orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. K. RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: V.T.M.PRASAD, SC FOR ENDOWNMENTS The Court made the following: