1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.07.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.JYOTHIMANI and THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN Habeas Corpus Petition (MD) No.443 of 2011 D.Sesu, S/o.Daniel ..Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Inspector of Police, Ambathurai Police Station, Authoor Taluk, Dindigul District. 3.Veerasekaran 4.Navaneethakrishnan, S/o.Veerasekaran. .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents to produce the body of the detenue Miss. Roslin Kanishka @ Rosy, aged 26 years, daughter of Sesu, before this Court and set her at liberty. For Petitioner :Mr.M.P.Senthil For Respondents :Mr.C.Ramesh, 1 & 2 Addl.Public Prosecutor. For Respondents- 3 & 4 : Mr.S.Gopalamanikandan O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by P.JYOTHIMANI,J) The petitioner, father of the detenue by name Roslin Kanishka @ Rosy, aged about 26 years, has filed this petition on the ground that while his daughter was working as a Teacher, she has fallen in love with the 4th respondent, a student, and according to him, the 4th respondent has taken away his daughter forcibly. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2.Today, the respondent police have secured the detenue and produced her before this Court. The 4th respondent is also present along with his parents. The parents of the detenue are also present. On enquiry, the detenue Roslin Kanishka @ Rosy stated in categoric terms that she has married the 4th respondent Navaneethakrishnan and they are living together at Manapparai along with the parents of the 4th respondent. She is also categoric in her statement that unless and until she, along with the 4th respondent, is invited she will not go with the petitioner, her father, at all. It is also brought to our notice that already the detenue and the 4th respondent had already approached this Court seeking police protection in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6540 of 2011 and this Court has also passed such an order on 02.06.2011 taking note of the fact that they were married. 3.In the circumstances that the detenue is a major and she herself has voluntarily stated that she is not willing to go with her father, the petitioner, recording the statement of the detenue, this habeas corpus petition is closed. The detenue is set at liberty. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Crl.Side) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To: 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Inspector of Police, Ambathurai Police Station, Authoor Taluk, Dindigul District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. gb rl/4c – 15.7.2011 Order in HCP(MD)No.443/2011 Dated:06.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/