IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2008 / 4TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 19089 of 2008(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- RAJAN, S/O. CHINNAN, PAVITHRAM, CHEVALLIL PARAMBIL, FEROKE COLLEGE.P.O, KOZHIKODE DT. BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL V.MOHAMMED RESPONDENT: --------------- THE SECRETARY, FEROKE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, FEROKE COLLEGE.P.O, KOZHIKODE DT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 19089 OF 2008 V ==================== Dated this the 25th day of June, 2008 J U D G M E N T The challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P1, requiring the petitioner to remove an advertisement board installed by him. Petitioner submits that Ext.P1 was issued without notice to him. From the facts as averred in the writ petition and also disclosed from Ext.P1, what is noticed is that the permission originally granted was only for three years and that the period has expired way back in 2004 itself. Since then there has not been any renewal of the permit and the petitioner has no case to that effect. If that be so, the petitioner cannot complain that by the issuance of Ext.P1, any of his vested rights have been affected. Petitioner also cannot say that before issue of Ext.P1, he should have been given notice to show cause. Therefore, Ext.P1 is unassailable. Writ petition is only to be dismissed and I do so. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp