SRWRE 13ERW a? WQ GD IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATrIsGARH AT BILAsPuR (ca) w.P. (s) No. @é: /2o1 : /' Sm’r. Kripa Kalyani Toppo W/o Sh‘ri Alexisus Toppo, aged abouf ' 38 years, LecTur'er', Governmenf Aadar'sh Ramanuj Higher Secondary School Baikun‘rhpur‘, Disf‘r. Koria (C.G.) PETITIONER r y‘g\9 xvv 5Q $° § Q~ o Q VERSUS Q‘Q 2§. §$ RESPONDENTS : / 1. Sfofe of Chhah‘isgar‘h Through Secretary, School Educa’rion Deportmenf D.K.S. Bhowan, Raipur (6.6.) Dis’rr‘icf Educm‘ion Officer Koria (C,G.) Biock Educofion Officer Baikum‘hpur, Koria (C.G.) Join‘l’ Direc’ror, Treasury Accoum‘ Era“ & Pension Koria DisH. Koria (C.G.) The Principle Governmen’r Aadarsh Ramanuj Higher Secondary School Baikunfhpur, DisTT. Koria (C.6.) Fwmqzwxrc] , S N x ; . WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE COSITUTIO OF INDI @@ NTN A HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR 0 WR!T PETITION (S) NO. 361 OF 2011 K; Petitioner Smt. Kripa Kalyani Toppo Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Articie 226/227 of the Constitution of lndia) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri MD. Tarek Haider, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to benefit of two advance increments on account of the fact that she has‘passed B.Ed. examination before her appointment on the post of teacher. lt is submitted that the issue involved in the present V petition is no longer res integra and the same has been finally decided by the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena v. State of MP. & Ors.1. 2. It is further submitted that this Court has also taken a similar view in its order dated 6-2-2009 passed in W.P. (S) No.6257 of 2008. Learned counsel further submits that the order dated 29-4-2010 passed in W.A.No.124 of 2009, wherein relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra) and the order passed by this Court in another W.A.No.87/2009, directions have been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two advance increments as per the circular dated 21-9-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of the facts pleaded in the petition. 3. ' Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the case of the petitioner would also be considered on the same lines. 4. ln view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments as per the circular dated 21-9-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of the facts pleaded in the petltion Within a perlod of 8 weeks from today ORDER (ORAL) . (Passed on this 215‘ day of January, 201 1) /r/” ‘ «a . ashok 1 2009 (m) MPJR (SC) 59 MM/ Sdl— Satish K Agmhotn Judge