EMf* RR.No., Preseiite dated..... .~l^3[^..^_.. is2^is'^) c ^ rfi ••u'^.jfc,,,,,^ IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CKKATTISGABH W.P. N0. ^8 /2Q06 PBTITIONBR RBSPONDBNTS Kamta Prasad Maithil, Aged about 49 yrs, S/o. Bharat Lal Maithil, R/o. Shyam Nagar, Post Ravigrain, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS / 11 State of Chh.attisgarh. Through: Secretary, Education Deptt, (3 fc D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^y/^"^ ^^f <J-"': District Education Officer, Raipur Pension Bada, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) / 31, Director of PubUc InstaTlction Pension Bada, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) WRXT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICfcE 2^6/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 33-HC-2Z 's'si^'iHWvWfWSvw. Kmw^ ^?U^5. •ur *ffKPITa)*<lch 'WI. 200 ^^I' ail^iw W\'h SIT^T ^H 'Hf?Tl > Gowri T sn^i'renw^ii?^ ZE.I-ZQOS Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, counsel Shri S.S. Rajput, Dy. Govt. Adv., fi for the petitioner. ^rthe State, on advance copy. ompleted more-' than 24 years servi< 'romotion Scheme has not been given imilar matter i.e. W.P. No.6504/2005 'Shhattisfsarh & Others), an order ha^ -1 -2006. He prays for similar order. State counsef does not dispute th^ Having considered the facts and 'act that the petitioner has completed ien/ice and has not been given the b icheme and further in view of ordi ^V.P.No.6504/2005, it is directed that th| ^nd decide th6 case of the petitioner ir^ ^i^Id^-l llltftl(^ 1^E<rt '<i^R€R ^? sriigiT air^i Heard. .*„ Learned counsel for the petitionejr submits that the petitioner has ;e, but benefit of Time Bound o him. He further submjts that in (V.K. Shrivastava vs. State of been passed by this Court on above fact. time bound promotion. Accordingly, the petition is alloweiff. CerKfied copy as per rules. Copy to State counsel for compliah.ee: icircumstances and in view of the more than 24 years of regular Isnefit of Time Bound Promotion ^r passed In similar case i.e. b concerned authority to consider accordance with law for grant of Sd'- Fakhruddin Judge [^^S34