IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41092 of 2007 MANOJ CHAUHAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 8 20.8.2008. Heard counsel for the petitioner, the State and the informant Petitioner is husband and the offence alleged is under Section 498A, 323, 341 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act. Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation regarding demand of dowry is not correct. The father of the informant was pressurizing for withdrawal of complaint case No.1103C of 2000 instituted against him by the petitioner. Since it was not done this false case has been instituted. Counsel appearing for opposite party no.2 submits that she is ready to live with her husband in case she is treated properly. The petitioner is ready to give assurance and also shows his willingness to live with opposite party no.2. Considering the aforesaid fact prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. The petitioner namely Manoj Chauhan is directed to surrender before the A.C.J.M Barh, Patna within four weeks from today and on his so surrendering he shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M. Barh, Patna in connection with Bhadaur P.S.Case no. 25 of 2005 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J)