IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32463 of 2010 MANOJ SHARMA, S/o Late Birju Sharma, R/o Village- Alhan Parasi, P.S.-Goh, District- Aurangabad. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 08-09-2010 Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution registered under sections 307/34 and other allied offences of the Indian Penal Code as also under Section 27 of the Arms Act, the petitioner and two other family members are named in the F.I.R. as accused. All the three F.I.R. named accused persons including the petitioner are said to have resorted to indiscriminate firing, as a result of which, some villagers sustained injuries on their persons. By referring to Annexure-2 series, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the injury reports of the injured persons do not support the prosecution case and other co-accused persons with almost similar allegations have already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar(Aurangabad) in connection with 2 Goh P.S.Case NO. 138 of 2008 subject to the conditions that (a) one of the bailors must be government servant or close family members of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner; (b) if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned and (c) the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every date, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fail to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. Sujit (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)