1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.62 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3024 OF 2006 Krushna Maruti Puralkar .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors... Respondents Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar for the petitioner Mr.Milind More, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 and 2 Mr.R.V.Govilkar for respondent nos.4 CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL & & & A.A.SAYED, JJ. A.A.SAYED, JJ. A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATED : 1ST FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED : 1ST FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED : 1ST FEBRUARY, 2008 (IN CHAMBER AT 2.35 P.M.) (IN CHAMBER AT 2.35 P.M.) (IN CHAMBER AT 2.35 P.M.) P.C.: . In view of the fact that the petitioner did not contest the stand taken by the respondent in the affidavit in reply filed in the main petition that there was no vacancy in the post of Junior Clerk in the New Law College which is reiterated by filing an affidavit of the Principal of the said 2 Law College in the review application, the petition was disposed of on the basis of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent Management that as and when vacancy arises, the case of the petitioner would be considered for promotion. Therefore, we do not find any reason to review our order. ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( J.N. PATEL, J ) ( A.A. SAYED, J ) ( A.A. SAYED, J ) ( A.A. SAYED, J )