IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.12233 of 2010 Date of Decision : December 19, 2011. M/s Satya Education Society .....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.N.D.Achint, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.R.D.Sharma, DAG, Haryana. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-Society has been denied recognition for upgradation of its School upto 10+2 standard, apparently for more than one reasons including that it does not have the requisite area of land and its fee structure is exorbitant. Learned counsel for the petitioner-Society, on the other hand, submits that the petitioner shall abide by the terms and conditions as may be imposed by the Education Department regarding the fee structure and would have no objection if the fee from the students is charged through a Government Agency. As regard to the area of the land, it is claimed that the petitioner-Society possesses more than the required land under the CWP No.12233 of 2011 [2] Rules framed by the Education Department. The petitioner is said to have made a representation dated 30.10.2009 (Annexure P-10) also but without any response thereto. Since the plea taken by the petitioner-Society requires verification of facts noticed above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to consider the request of the petitioner- Society as contained in the afore-mentioned representation dated 30.10.2009, in the light of the observations made herein-above, and pass an appropriate order within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. December 19, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE