1;' IN THE H1GH COURTOFJl/DIO\Tl/R.EAT Bit^SPURCCG) MISCELLANEOl/S APPEAL N0. C-SjlOOU 1^12180 APPELLANT CLAIMANT ^i ^m C2) C3) C4) RESPONPENT NON-APPL1CANT ^.^ ^•^ ^ '•' •:^:>£'" ^ '^•-" ^ •^' Soh4 Bgi Vy/o Sri Lgvgn Pr3s<ij Vefmg, Agej ^bou-t- 40 yegrs, Ishwgr Pqs3J S/o Sri Lgvgn Pr9s94 Vermg, Age4 3bou-t- 20 yegrs, Ku. Ashg D/o Sri Lavgn Prgsa4 Vermg, Acjecj gbou-t-17 ye3^s, Shushil Kum9i-5/o 5ri Uvgn Prgsgcj Verm?, Agej gbou-t- 15 years, Applicgnt No.3 & 4-, gre represen-tej by Mo'tbei-.Song by, All 3re R./O Villgge- & Post- Sitara, Distt- taipurCC.G.) VERSUS m C2) (3) ,/' Sac)ar S/o Sri Bhagwg-f: Das Mgnikpuri, R/o - Villgcje Pachgripgrg Durg, Tghsil 6 Pistt- PurgCC.G.) Bus No. C.G. 07ZA- 0252 Pawgn Kumar Tgmrgksr 5/o 5ri Kn'shng Kumgr R/o Tgmerp^rs, Durg, Tghsil & Pistt- DurgCC.G.) The Insurance Company Ljmi-tej., 'rThrough: Divisiongl M^ngger- Ng'tiongl Insuqnce Comp^ny Limrtej., G.E. R.ogj, Rsipur, Dis-tt- R.gipui-CCG.) ^^' Miscellaneous Appeal under/section 173 Motor VehicleAct1988 i XI-HC-22 IWWI ShHI^ 3^ '^l<<l<t<<, ®Tfly'l(o,fE|<-llti^< 3ii^i ^aqi g^.U.6...C>4^.^?Tj; 200 •W^T^T f^IRiSII^T a»ii«hgf??r 3II^T?CTWHf?(T ^rafwfh-wicif ff tec^ rfSTRR ^Tsri^iTan^r uiViS'QMBENCH: HON'BLE A.K. PATNAiK, S HON'BLE FAKHRUDDi - Heard Ivir. S.C. Verma i<t N.K. Acsrawai, Sr. Advocate, viti resDondeni No.S/Nanonai insur^n This is sn appeal nied judgmsnt and award dated 1S IVlotor Accldent Claims Tribui ase No.56 of 2003. /"^. '^u/&! During fhe pendency ofl 18./08/2004 to compromlse thq rssoondent No.S/National insui a sum of Rs.60,000/- (Rupeej amount of Rs.2,54,600/- (Rup| hundred oniy) awarded under Tribunal, to the dalman'ts / 2005) under Order 23 Ruie 3| been fiied by clalmant/appl ciaimants/appeilants No.3 an< fhe tnterest of a!l the ciaimari supported by an affidavit of claij ;amed counsel for the appeilants and Mr. ith Mr. Qamrui Aziz 'earned counsei for ice Company Limlted. y the c!almants/appe!lants against S!- 110.2003 passed by the Fourth Additiona! lai-cum-Dlsirict Judge, Raipur in Ciaim the appeal, the pa.rties have agreed on matter and as per the said compromise, |ancs Company LiinJted has agreed to pay sixh/ thousand only) in addition to the ^es two iakhs fifty four thousand and six |:he impugned award snd judgment of the )el!ants. An application (i.A.No.697 of of the Code of Civil Procedure has also iliant No.1 on beha!f of t'ne minor 14 stating therein that the compromise is in |ts / appeilants. The appiication is aiso nt/apDeliantNo.1. (iftiy^) XI-HC-22 H11CTI sn*<|tt> 3^'^pi^pr, aTfl^'is, (eiowy 3ii^i«ac*i ,A, ^o, o'i-Va^ ^ ' 2()0 Rl'b^, SD^TqiT R-fi+sn^r shiiti yfgfl 311^1 S'WIIWHfN' dispo^ed Hence thisappeal is The-compromise petitjon dated 1^ wil! form part of this compromi^e judgment of the Tribunal stands Sd/- Chief Justice °ni<<f<'i<n-i *<itfciTff tec(9' <Ri«i< ^iSlf^TStI^r of in terms of the sald compromise. 1.08.2004 as weli as I.A.No.697 of 200; order. The impugned award and m|odified accordingly. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge