IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5705 of 2011 ACHADA KUMARI Versus THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION ----------- 2. 29.03.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 24.3.2011 of the State Election Commission directing rearrangement of the serial number of the names of the petitioner and respondent no. 5 under Form 9 for preparation of ballot papers. In view of the fact that the elections having been notified and the inability of the writ court to interfere at this stage more particularly without issuing notice to respondent no. 5 it is submitted that the petitioner proposes to represent before the State Election Commission in context of what is alleged as violation of rules and instruction. Those are aspects more appropriately to be examined by the State Election Commission expeditiously so that the petitioner is not non suited only by non consideration of her representation in time. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)