S2654.09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 2654 OF 2009 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3670 2009 IN SUIT NO. 2654 OF 2009 Chinmay Milind Bhalerao & Anr. ...Plaintiffs. Vs. Milind Kaleshwar Bhalerao & Anr. ...Defendants. Mr. Harshad Parekh for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Mahesh Shukla for Defendant No.1. Mr. Rupesh Lanjekar with Mr. Atul Danie for Defendant No.2. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 25th JANUARY, 2010. P.C.- 1 In a family dispute, the parties have arrived at the settlement and recorded in consent terms dated 25th January, 2010. It is signed by all the parties and their respective advocates. It is taken on record and marked "X". Defendant No.2 is a bank and a formal party. They have no objection if the matter is settled between the parties. All the parties are present in the Court. There is no dispute/objection of any kind to the signatures, authorization and identification of the parties. The statement is made that, S2654.09 2 it is well within the framework of law and the record. No other persons/ parties will be affected by this consent terms. The suit is accordingly, disposed of in view of the consent terms. 3 In view of this, the Notice of motion is also disposed of in view of the Consent Terms. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)