1 63-wp8471-11 rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8471 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. ..... Mr. R. M. Haridas for the petitioner. ..... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 28, 2011. P.C.: The petitioner is the original defendant in a suit filed by the respondent. The respondent filed affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief. The photocopies of certain electricity bills and statements issued by Reliance Energy were produced along with the affidavit. By the impugned order dated 27th October, 2011, the learned Judge of the Small Causes Court allowed the respondents to produce the originals of the photocopies of the documents which were already filed on record. A Revision Application preferred by the petitioner against the said order has been dismissed. 2 63-wp8471-11 2. The submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that under Rule 1 of Order XIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the original documents were required to be filed at the time of institution of the suit. He urged that no case was made out in the application for grant of permission to file the documents at a belated stage. 3. By the impugned order, the respondents- plaintiffs have been permitted to produce original documents, the photocopies of which were already produced. The impugned order does not record that the original documents have been admitted in evidence. Merely the production of original documents has been allowed. 4. This is not a case where extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India can be invoked. Hence, petition is dismissed. (A.S.OKA, J.)