1 rpst4554 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.4554 OF 2011 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.1043 OF 2010 Deeplal G. Tikamdasot & Ors. ...Petitioners vs. Sunanda Rajendra Kumbhat & Ors. ...Respondents Ms M.Merchant i/b Mr.Haresh G. Ganatra for the petitioners None for the respondents CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : FEBRUARY 21,2011 P.C.: . Not on board. Taken on board. 1 In support of the review petition, the review petitioners who are the obstructionists have placed reliance on the document at Exh.D and the letter dated 28 th April 1969 (Exh.B). 2 No reasons have been assigned as to why the review petitioners could not produce the record of Regional Transport Officer in the Courts below while contesting the obstructionist notice. Admittedly, the applicants did not rely upon the letter dated 28 th April 1969 (Exh.B) during the course of hearing of the obstructionists notice. Hence, there is no error apparent on the face of the record. Even otherwise also there is no ground for review. Review petition is rejected. 3 On the prayer made by the learned counsel for the review petitioners, ad-interim relief granted on 10 th December 2010 in Revision Application is extended by a period of six weeks from today. JUDGE