IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.12667 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision.20.07.2011 Naresh Kumar Sehgal son of late Shri Bihari Lal Sehgal, resident of near Govt. Girls School, Kotkapura, District Faridkot .....Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab through its Principal Secretary-cum-Financial Commissioner Revenue, Revenue Department, Punjab Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? Yes 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the application (Annexure P-1) given to the respondent is appropriately considered and a decision is taken on his application for renewal of licence. 2. Notice of motion. At the asking of Court, Mr. Arvind Mittal, Accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall supply two copies of complete paper book of writ petition to the State counsel for proper communication of the order. 3. The decision will be taken by respondent No.3 within a period of 8 weeks from the date when the representation along with this order is forwarded to the Deputy Commissioner, Faridkot. The writ petition is disposed of on the above lines. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 20, 2011 Pankaj*