IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-17479 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 17.8.2009 Sahid … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Salil Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Partap Singh, Sr.DAG, Haryana. Mr.Raminder Chauhan, Advocate for Mr.Sunil Panwar, Advocate for the complainant. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral) On the last date of hearing, the case was adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the complainant to enable him to find out as to whether the petitioner and prosecutrix Hassan @ Aristoon have been legally married or not. Learned State counsel on the instructions received from Sub- Inspector Satpal Singh submits that on verification, it has been found that both the petitioner and prosecutrix have got legally married. In view the above, order dated 3.7.2009 passed by this Court is made absolute. The petitioner shall, however, keep on joining the investigation as and when called and shall abide by the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. [ Rakesh Kumar Jain ] Judge 17.8.2009 sd