IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2008 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 12715 of 2008(L) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------ 1. T.K.SASI, CASUAL WORKER, KUMARAKOM AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH STATION, KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM. 2. A.K.KALADHARAN, CASUAL WORKER, KUMARAKOM AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH STATION, KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM. 3. K.H.SIYAD, CASUAL WORKER, KUMARAKOM, AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH STATION, KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM. 4. K.C.ANILKUMAR, CASUAL WORKER, KUMARAKOM, AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH STATION, KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM. 5. T.R.GEORGEKUTTY, CASUAL WORKER, KUMARAKOM,AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH STATION, KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM. 6. K.T.REJIMON, CASUAL WORKER,KUMARAKOM, ,AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH STATION, KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM. 7. V.T.SANTHOSH KUMAR, CASUAL WORKER, ,KUMARAKOM,,AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH STATION, KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM. 8. P.K.PRADEEPAN, CASUAL WORKER,,KUMARAKOM, ,AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH STATION, KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM. 9. T.J.JOHN, CASUAL WORKER,,KUMARAKOM, ,AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH STATION, KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM. 10. VIDHU BOSE, CASUAL WORKER,,KUMARAKOM, AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH STATION, KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM. 11. K.K.PRABHA, CASUAL WORKER,,KUMARAKOM, AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH STATION, KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.VAKKOM N.VIJAYAN SMT.REEJA HARI SRI.P.ANIYAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, VELLANIKKARA, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR. 3. THE REGISTRAR, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY VELLANIKARA, THRISSUR. 4. THE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, REGIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH STATION, KUMARAKOM, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI. RANJITH THAMPAN, S.C. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 12715 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 11th April, 2008. J U D G M E N T The petitioners are aggrieved by the cancellation of a select list of workers for appointment in the 2nd respondent-University wherein the petitioners were included. Although an earlier writ petition filed by them was dismissed, by Ext. P9 order in I.A.No. 450/07 in R.P.No. 401/2006, a Division Bench held that dismissal of their earlier writ petition and the said I.A would not stand in the way of the petitioners moving the University. Pursuant thereto, the petitioners have filed Ext. P10 representation before the 3rd respondent. The petitioners now seek an early disposal of Ext. P10. 2. I have heard the learned standing counsel for the University also. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P10 as expeditiously as possible at any rate within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the representatives of the petitioners. However, I make it clear that I have not decided the question of eligibility of the petitioners for the relief prayed for in Ext. P10 in merits and it would be open to the 3rd respondent to decide the same independently. The writ petition is disposed of as above. The petitioner shall forward a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition to the 3rd respondent for compliance. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/