IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 475 OF 2010 MR. BINOD KUMAR SAHAY ... Petitioner Versus THE CHIEF OFFICER AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Sudesh Usgaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. N.K. Sawaikar, Advocate for Respondent no.1. Mr. A.N.S.Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. D. Lawande, Advocate for Respondent no.2. Coram:- A. S. OKA & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 29th June, 2010 P.C: Rule. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for concerned respondents waive service. 3. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner is seeking a writ of mandamus enjoining the first respondent to grant construction license to the Petitioner. It appears that in view of the direction issued by this Court in Suo Motu Writ petition No.02 of 2007, the first respondent Municipal Council has not granted licence to the Petitioner. In view of the Order dated 25th November, 2009 passed by this Court in writ petition no.632 of 2009 and other connected petitions, the learned Counsel appearing for the first respondent and the Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the second respodnent state that the said respondents are submitting to the orders of this Court. 4. We have perused the Order dated 25th November, 2009. In view of the averments made in the writ petition,we dispose of the writ petition by issuing the following directions: a) It will be open to the first respondent to issue construction licence and occupancy certificate to the petitioner. However, the construction licence and occupancy certificate shall be granted subject to compliance with Rule 27 of the Model Bylaws under the Goa Daman and Diu Municipal Council Building Byelaws, 1987. b) Licence shall be issued within a period of three weeks form today. The municipal Council shall enforce the compliance of the said bylaws before granting licence. c) There shall be no orders as to costs. A. S. OKA, J. F. M. REIS, J. ap/-