FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6390 OF 2009 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | Mr. S.L. Bhapkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for respondents. ..... Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing at admission stage. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. Limited relief claimed in this petition is to direct respondent No.2 District Resettlement Officer, Beed to issue certificate of project affected candidate in the name of son of the petitioner i.e. Deepak Karbhari Khaladkar, 3. The learned A.G.P. in all fairness, submits that in view of decision relied by the petitioner in the case of Sow. Sangita w/o Balu Sable vs. State of Maharashtra and others in Writ Petition No. 4478 of 2007 decided on 15-10-2007, the petitioner would be entitled for issuance of the said certificate. As a matter of fact, it would have been appropriate for the Secretary of the Revenue and Forest Department and Secretary of General Administration Department to issue instructions to all concerned clarifying the position expounded in the above said decision so that the competent authority would accede to the request of the petitioner. 4. In the circumstances, we allow this Writ Petition and direct the respondent No.2 to consider the request of the petitioner for issuance of certificate of project affected persons subject to eligibility. The petition is disposed of accordingly. Rule made absolute in above terms. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.) Date:10.02.2010. rlj/