CWP No. 2404/2009 03.08.2011 Present: Mr. Subhash Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G for respondent No.1 Petitioner has prayed mainly for the following relief:- “i) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may be issued to the Respondent Corporation directing it to adhere to time limit schedule contained in Annexure P-1. ii) Respondent Corporation may kindly be further directed to give over time allowance to its employees as per Annexure P-1. It is further prayed that the arrears with respect to over time allowance which were unilaterally stopped by the respondent Corporation in 2004, may kindly be ordered to be paid to the drivers and conductors of the respondent depot after calculating the same as per the time schedule contained in Annexure P-1. iii) That respondent Corporation may kindly be further directed to provide show kits to the drivers and conductors of the respondent depot. iv) That respondent Corporation may kindly be further directed to give tribal allowance to the drivers and conductors, recruited on contract basis.” 2. Insofar as relief No. (i) is concerned, there is no dispute that the Notification dated 22.12.2003 (Annexure P-1) has to be followed by the respondent Corporation, who shall ensure that the same is followed in letter and spirit. 3. With respect to other grievances, it is always open for the petitioner to point out the same to respondent No.2 within a reasonable period of time. As and when any such representation is received, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt thereof. Earlier representation, if pending with respondent No.2 shall also be taken into account while taking a decision. 3. With the aforesaid observations, writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. August 03, 2011 ( Sanjay Karol ), (rana) Judge.