112wp4834.09.odt 1 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.4834 of 2009 (Mushtaq s/o. Jamil Shaikh .vs. State and Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: D.D.Sinha and F. M. Reis, JJ. Date : 01/12/2009. Heard Mr. Vishal Anand, Adv. for petitioner. This petition is directed against the order dt. 17.7.2008 passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur whereby the Original Application of petitioner came to be rejected. Considered the contentions canvassed by the learned Counsel. It is nodoubt true that the petitioner was interviewed and his name was recommended by the Selection Committee for appointment; however, because of change in the policy of the Government and imposition of ban on fresh recruitment, appointment order was not issued to the petitioner. It is well settled by the catena of decisions of the Supreme Court that mere selection does not confer right to get the order of appointment if there is change in the policy of Government. This aspect has been considered by the Tribunal on the basis of decisions of the Apex 112wp4834.09.odt 2 . Court and therefore, in our view, no case is made out for showing indulgence. Hence, the petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE jais