IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22368 of 2011 Vijay Chand SON OF LATE RAM SAKAL SAO RESIDENT OF MOHALLA WARD NO. 34, NIMGANJ, P.S. BIHAR SHARIF, DISTRICT NALANDA. Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 2 16/12/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Merely by labeling himself to be a Paid Co- operative Manager, petitioner does not acquire a new status. The basic facts stand that he was a PACS Manager. His claim for payment of salary between the period June, 1999 to January, 2004 has been considered in light of the earlier direction of the Court and the reason for non-payment seems to be evident because petitioner was not entitled to payment of salary as a regular employee on a regular basis but was subject to recovery which he was supposed to effect from the various loanees. The facts and figures with regard to the performance of the petitioner are evident from the chart annexed with the speaking order contained in annexure-4 and if that is the status, then no direction can be issued in favour of the petitioner for payment; especially when the - 2 - status of the petitioner has already been declared by several decisions of this Court on many a occasion. This writ application is dismissed being devoid of merit. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)