1 C.R.A. NO.184/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.184 OF 2010 Salim s/o Chand Shikalgar ... APPLICANT VERSUS The Maharashtra State Wakf Board and others ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri H.I. Pathan, Advocate for the applicant Shri M.B.W. Khan, Advocate holding for Shri Wajed Khan, Advocate for respondents ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 6th December, 2010 PER COURT : 1. Heard. The plaintiff asserted to be a Mutawalli and in actual possession of the Masjid premises, negatived prima facie by the learned Presiding Officer, based on the old documents. The controversy revolves the installation of seven Panjas during the period of Moharram, commencing from 7th December 2010. Plaintiff assets that since at least 50 years, the installation of seven Panjas was in the premises and this has been prohibited, inhibited by the rival group for the present year. In order to substantiate his contention, a photograph at Page 25 is tendered. However, reading or looking at the photograph alone it cannot be said that the entire premises of Masjid could be used by the applicant during the period of Moharram, thereby restricting and arresting of the 2 C.R.A. NO.184/2010 rival group to perform prayers. 2. The suggestion that has come forward and noted by the learned Presiding Officer illustrate that two shops are available close to the premises and the ceremonies of installation of seven Panjas can be safely done at said place. It seems, the place may not have vital importance for the applicant, but the ego of the applicant with rival group is clashing. Mr. Khan, learned counsel for respondents submits, the applicant shall also be allowed to participate as one of the trustee in the activities of the ceremonies for the ten days during Moharram. Due to this position, the order under challenge does not call for any interference. The installation shall be in the shop premises under the proper permission from the local police authorities as it should not create any law and order problem for the people. The petitioner shall also be allowed to participate as one of the trustee of the Masjid. Civil Revision Application is disposed of with above indications. No costs. Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order, duly signed by the Sheristedar of this Court. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cra184.10