IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH JANUARY 2011 / 29TH POUSHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 481 of 2011() ---------------------------------------- (CRIME JO.538/2006 OF CHAVAKKAD POLICE STATION,THRISSUR DISTRICT) ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 ------------------------------------------- SANEESH, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.SAIDU, PANDARI HOUSE, THIRUVATHIRA, MANATHALA VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. (CRIME NO.538 OF 2006 OF CHAVAKKAD POLICE STATION). BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/01/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No.481 of 2011 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 19.01.2011 ORDER Petitioner, who is the 2nd accused in S.C.No.442/2009 on the file of I Additional Sessions Court, Thrissur, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Admittedly non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Court below and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the court below and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably, on the same date on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner. This Bail Application is, accordingly, disposed of. Dated this the 19th day of January, 2011 V. RAMKUMAR,(JUDGE) sj