1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. C.A.S. NO. 212/09 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 543/07. Uttamrao N. Dhomane & others .vs. Krushnarao Dhomne ________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders. Registrars orders. Mr. N.R. Saboo, Advocate for the appellants, Mr. R. Bhuibhar, Advocate for respondent. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATED : MARCH 5, 2009. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this application, the applicants are seeking an extension of time to furnish security. This Court by order dated 21.11.2007 admitted the appeal and interim stay was granted. Subsequently, on 27.2.2008 conditional order came to be passed that the appellant to furnish security within a period of one month. The learned Counsel for the applicants submits that as he was not aware of the order dated 27.2.2008, the security was not furnished. The reasons are stated in the application. The learned Advocate further submits that he is ready to furnish the security within a period of two weeks from today. In my opinion, it will be appropriate and in the interest of justice to grant period of two weeks to the applicants. The period of two weeks as a last chance is granted. The application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. JUDGE. J.