1. CRM-M No. 21098 of 2010 Kashmir Singh vs. State of Punjab 2. CRM-M No. 21188 of 2010 Jagdev Singh vs. State of Punjab 3. CRM-M No. 30543 of 2009 Pakhar Singh vs. State of Punjab 4. CRM-M No. 34207 of 2010 Jaswinder Singh and another vs. State of Punjab 5. CRM-M No. 5901 of 2011 Jarnail Singh Nihang alias Ajmer Singh vs. State of Punjab **** Present: Mr.G.S.Kaura, Advocate Mr.Balbir Singh, Advocate Mr. S.S. Rana, Advocate Mr.S.S. Rangi, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AAG, Punjab. Mr. GBS Dhillon, Advocate for the complainant. **** The aforesaid five petitions have been filed by the petitioner(s) for the grant of regular bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 15 dated 26.04.2009, under Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 323, 436, 447, 427,511,148 and 149 IPC registered at Police Station Koom Kalan, Police District Khanna, District Ludhiana. Learned AAG, on instructions from ASI Satnam Singh, has stated that all the prosecution witnesses have been examined except the investigating officer because he suffered a heart attack. Seeks one month's CRM-M No. 21098 of 2010 -2- CRM-M No. 21188 of 2010 CRM-M No. 30543 of 2009 CRM-M No. 34207 of 2010 CRM-M No. 5901 of 2011 time to lead the entire evidence. It is made clear that if the entire evidence of the prosecution is not led within one month then the trial Court shall release the petitioner(s) on bail. This order obviously will not be effective if the evidence is not led due to any action on behalf of the petitioner(s). As regards Jaswinder Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that he is admitted in hospital. He is allowed to move an application for bail on medical grounds before the learned trial Court and his application for bail shall be decided within one week by the learned trial Court. With the aforesaid observations, these petitions stand disposed of. A photocopy of this order be placed on all the files of the connected cases. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE July 25, 2011 sunita