-o..- ^••',/, ^y-'y tvv ^^>p'w ^,'\><^'-" vi' ^ ^ ^ y'^"\^ °^y ^l^^ <S) ^" ^> IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W. P. (Ct N0. ^.^ / 2010 PETITIONERS :1 2. Devashree D/o Shri D.P.Dytta, ^[t-'ft<tfitd~'<s^':?r.?s- r About 30 years, R/oft Tahsil - Bemetra, Distt. Durg-fC.G.) Devashish Dutta, S/o Shri D.P.Dutta, oiU-- xvuW.i <»-, Aged about 31 years, R/o k Tahsil - Bemetra, Distt. Durg-(C.G.) l|OS.(6 RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Collector, District - Durg (C.G.) 3. Tahsildar, Respw^'r-^- District - Durg (C.G.) 4. Chief Executive Officer District Panchayat, Durg District- Durg.( Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA sn^i^ii (<;-li?b 3D§?i s-iiHlch ^TT??f FVVV Fraveen. ^-ei •^fFtK^, 'S'^FfflTS. hwwy. 3TI^T TT?ra? _.kj..p..(&-/.2.y.6.B^° WlR'ffWW* 200 sn^r'gTcnwfflsa Shri Shushobhit Smgh, Shri Suryakant State/respondents No. 1 to 3, Heard. On the la.st date of petitioners, tim.e to seek instj made tn paragraph-5 of the re| proposed to take the land of th| (pounsel for the petitioners. Mis|hra, Panel Law}'er for the instt'uctions, Leamed counsel for statement made by fhe respoi affidavit, this petition may be Accordingly, in view of t) the State/respondents No. averinents uiade in para-5 petitioners' land has been accj under fhe scheme of N.R.EJ made, this petition is iinally 4 petitioners to seek redressa| attempt is made to disposses<) followuig due procedure prescrjib ^l^ltrf^l^ TW^ ^ 'f^t ^•^R ^'sipgqsn^i Ihearing, this Court allowed the >, m view of the statement tiirn that the respondents have not (e petitioners. petitjioners submits that in view of such spor^dents in theu- retum, supported by l^nalty disposed of. ie stancl which has been taken bv t.o 3 in their retum and tlie of the return, that neither the luired for construction of the road 3.A., nor any proposal has been [isposed of, reservtag libertv to the of their grievance in ca.se aiiy fhem from their property without )ed under the law. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge