^ ^ c^ l/ ^' ^--•"~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO.^o C 2_QF 2005 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS / ^^ /<>/ / < »• 'lfk "^ia^-?^- /^Dashnath Singh, S/o. Manglu Singh, Caste-Adiwasi Gond, aged about 47 years, R/o. village Pathakpur, Post Kalyanpur, Distt.Sarguja (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of M.P. Through the Secretary, Department of Forest, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) ^2. Sub-Divisional Officer, (Forest) South Production, Sarguja Van Mandal Ambikapur, Sarguja (C.G.) Divisional Forest Officer, North Sarguja Division, Ambikapur, Distirict Sarguja (M.P.) Conservator of Forest, Production Sarguja Van Mandal, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) 5. State Administrative Tribunal of Chhattisgarh, Through the Chairman , Raipur (C.G.) /3. WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RE?.' £^^ ^»a,, .r^ •o ^-l^ CLEr?KtoA.G.B?LARprjK ^^" vdx^'-^i^irt^,yTTl'<-i-li<s, RlrtKiy<< _,_ ^f.Mo^o6^/^^l~ lTTOc5T^m^ """"""""—"•••^•"—" ^200 3TT^?T q?W (''icrf^sRF) 3TT^?T<PTR-lich ^2TT3TT^5Ta?H^ 'L. ?T?rr^^?f3Tr^$T 13.06,2005 Shri Anaad Kumar Sl Shri G.K. Beriwal, D^ advance copy. Heard, Tribujial, The niaia grievaace oi fhe origiaal appUcation N Admiaistrative Tribunal, J< traasferred to fhis Coiut petitioner raakes a limited the said origiaal appUcatio^i State Adiiiiaistrative possible aiid fh.e inatter be Counsel for fhe petitioner been aboUshed, fhere is inatter to tiiis Court as fh( routiae niaaner. State Counsel does it by counsel for fhe petitione^ The prayer is atlowed) Let fhe records of 0| the High Court from S.A.T.,) At fhis stage, it is fhe cases have already process oftaMag over aad| ordered that if fhe case (0| be|en SP/FS/2005-20,000 <pi<i[c^<Ttri +ii^cl)V^"Ks^Q ^Fji^-dt^ ^3Tf^r3?i^^T ukla, counsel for fhe petitioner, Advocate General for the State on the petitioner is that the records of I|o. 694/97 ffled beforc the State ^balpur has not been received or ItiU date. Learaed counsel for the ^rayer that presently fhe records of be called or traasferred froin fhe i^ial, bench at Raipur, as early as [disposed of ia accordaace with law. Isubnuts fhat siace fhe S.A.T. has 10 impedioient m transferrmg fhe raatters are to be trao.sferred ia a i|Lot oppose fhe luxdted prayer raade |A. No. 694/1997 be traiisferrcd to Raipur. br<|>ught to fhe nbtice offhis Court that received in fhe High Court aad [registrations are going on. It is also |A. No. 694/1997) has already been i:i ! f 1' ^r -:.^.:j- vdz^i <-^i«icl)<4,u>-a1<<-i<i<?, RiowyY TTO^T^^T^ ............................Y...... ^200 3TI^^T q^q»(tjclijel^) W^^T<PTR^14> ^S>H3TT^$Tg?^) \1^'*' '(-.- / ^m^R^rf^rOT^^T -2 received or ta'aD.sferred fit registered aad be fixed for h|< With fhe above disposed of. Certified copy as per ^ules, obseih^ations <pi^Irt<i1ri +ii+ioV^afel<£l^Ri^-ci^ ^3lf^73lI^9T ^m S.A.T. Raipur, the saoie be learing ia accordaace with law. », fhe petition staads finally Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge SP/FS/2005-20,000 f ^-zu'u"