IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. R. No.2013 of 2003 Date of Decision:9.11.2010 Anil .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: None for the petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Dalal, A.A.G. Haryana. Mr. S.P. Chahar, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Case file shows that the matter is being adjourned either on account of the absence of the counsel for the petitioner or one pretext or other. Today also, no one is present on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. 9.11.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE