Civil Revision No. 8285 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 8285 of 2010 Date of Decision: 20.12.2010 Vikas Malik …Petitioner Versus Sahil Mangla …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, has submitted that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present revision petition as he will not assail the order dated 26.10.2010, passed by the Rent Controller, Ludhiana and make an alternative prayer to this Court that the Rent Controller be directed to decide the eviction petition within a specified time frame. It is stated that personal necessity has been pleaded in the eviction petition and Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, has been invoked. I find merit in the alternative submission, made by learned counsel for the petitioner. The Rent Controller, Ludhiana, is directed to decide the eviction petition, within a period of nine months, from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, after affording three opportunities for Civil Revision No. 8285 of 2010 2 leading evidence to both the parties. The present revision petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with the observations made above. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge December 20, 2010 “DK”