-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.164 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.815 OF 2005 Maharshi Karve Stree Shikshan Sanstha. .. .. Petitioner v/s. Smt.Sulbha Tilekar. .. .. Respondents Mr.Y.S.Jahagirdar with Mrs.S.S.Deshpande for petitioner. Mr.M.A. Patil for respondents. ---- CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & SMT.R.S.DALVI, JJ. SMT.R.S.DALVI, JJ. SMT.R.S.DALVI, JJ. DATED : 23rd December 2005 DATED : 23rd December 2005 DATED : 23rd December 2005 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Jahagirdar in support of this Review Petition, which seeks modification of our order passed on 28th September 2005 while admitting Writ Petition No.815 of 2005. It is submitted that the petitioner is an educational institution and, therefore, should not be made to deposit the amount as per the order. 2. Mr.Patil appearing for the respondent-teacher, on the other hand, points out that the teacher has succeeded in the Courts below and that is why the amount has been directed to be deposited with interest being paid to the teacher. -2- He also points out that various submissions were already made and considered. 3. Having considered all these submissions of both the Counsel, we do not find that there is any reason to modify the order that we have passed. The Review Petition is, therefore, rejected. 4. Mr.Jahagirdar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, points out that the time to deposit the amount has expired at the end of November 2005. He seeks extension of time by two months. The amount, therefore, be deposited by end of January 2006, whereafter it will be invested as directed earlier and interest should be paid to the teacher. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (SMT.R.S.DALVI, J.) (SMT.R.S.DALVI, J.) (SMT.R.S.DALVI, J.)