<3? ‘ 5Q, ervice Mattelgl ’ GARH AT' WRIT PETITION(S) No. 3% /201 1 2 . Bajnoo Mudiyar, son of Tulsi, aged about 3 years, Waterman, residence of Pahadi Korwa Ashram, Dima, Block Mainpat, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. ‘ VCISuS . 1 (State of Chhattsgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. fiAssistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Sarguja,, Chhattisgarh. 4 . (Collector, Sarguja, District Sarguja, .7 Chhattisgarh. .v/ 5. Block Education Officer, Block Mainpat, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. THE ‘ S.B. (S IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) / PETITIONER: O ar i .K Respondents / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Hmm mm agamm m “i“ Shri C.J.K. Rae, counsei for fh peiitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panei Lawy r forthe 3taie, on advance copy. ‘ Learned counsel for the peiiii ner submits thai the issue reiating to ciaim of contreotuai payment to Cook and iher empioyees came up for consideration \ before this Court in WP. (S) No."004/11 and hatch of petitions and after examining the claim of the petitione , this Court had directed consideration oft the case in those cases. He submits hat the case of the petitioner is covered by the aforesaid order. On the other hand, iearned counsel for the State submits that the representation of the petitioner wouid be decided after due verification. After going through the or er dated 15.4.2011 passed in WP.(S) No.2004l'1‘ ’l, it is apparent that the c se of the petitioner is squareiy covered by the aforesaid order. Therefore, the p itioner is atsc entitied to the same direction inthe case. Accordingly, it is directed that f the petitioner makes fresh representation ng payment of minimum wages applicabie i before the concerned authority, cia to a contract empioyee under te Chhattisgarh Civil Service (Contract Appointment) Rules, 20m, the sam shail be disposed of in accordance with law, within a period of eight Weeks fr m the date of submission of representation. ln the event of any adverse order, t e petitioner wouid be at iiben’y to fiie writ petition afresh. Wtth the aforesaid direction,t e petition is fmaily disposed of. he Sd/— #7. Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ' ‘ " % g ‘ i