IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 27TH MAY 2011 / 6TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 14382 of 2011(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- K.K. ALIKUTTY, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O MUHAMMED, KUNHIKANDIYIL KUDUKKIE HOUSE, NIRAMARUTHOOR P.O., TIRUR VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADV. MR. NIRMAL. S MR. P.P.RAVOOF RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. IMBICHIKOYA, S/O ABDURAHMAN @ BAVA HAJI, MADAMPATT HOUSE, NIRAMARUTHOO P.O., TIRUR VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 676 109 2. ABDURAHMAN, S/O YANU, VDLATHOOR HOUSE, NIRAMARUTHOO P.O., TIRUR VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 676 109 3. MAIMOONA MADAMPATT, W/O VELLATHOOR ABDURAHMAN, NIRAMARUTHOO P.O., TIRUR VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 676 109 4. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUR - 676109 5. THE COMMISSIONER, LAND REVENUE PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P (C) No. 14382 of 2011 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 27th May , 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers : i). Issue a writ of mandamus directing the 4th respondent to take immediate steps against the 1,2 & 3 respondents for the unauthorized filling and constructed effected in R.S. 40/2 in Niramaruthur amsom desom in Tirur Taluk. ii). Issue a writ of mandamus directing the 4th respondent to dispose of Ext. P6 as expeditiously as possible. iii) Issue such other writ, order or direction this Honourable Court may deem fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the grievance of the petitioner will be redressed, if a direction is given to the 4th respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P6 within a reasonable time. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 4.Considering the limited nature of relief sought for and proposed to be given, this Court does not find it necessary to go into the merits of the case and so also there is no necessity issue notices to the W.P. (C) No. 14382 of 2011 : 2 : respondents 1 to 3 for the time being. Accordingly the 4th respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P6 in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned, including the petitioner and the respondents 1 to 3, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition before the second respondent for further steps. The Writ Petition is disposed of. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd