IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10511 of 2010 2 27.4.2010 Nagendra Kumar Bind son of Raman Bind, resident of village- Hirdan Chak, Police Station- Paras Bigha, District Jehanabad .... Petitioner VERSUS The State of Bihar .... Opposite Party ------- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is husband of the complainant in a case under Sections 498A, 494 and other Sections of the IPC. It has been submitted that some other co-accused being relations of the petitioner have been extended benefit of anticipatory bail and the case of the petitioner stands on same footing. Petitioner being the husband has to bear the responsibility of treating his wife with honour and dignity and his case cannot be equated with his other relations. In the facts of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. In case, petitioner surrenders within a period of 10 weeks and satisfies the court below that he has compromised all the differences with the complainant, in that event he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail 2 bonds to the satisfaction of the court below on the date of surrender itself. Otherwise, his prayer for bail shall be considered on its own merit. During the aforesaid period of 10 weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner in connection with complaint case no.197 of 2008 pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad. (Shiva Kirti Singh,J.) sk