IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 9867 of 2008. Decided on 14th December, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Nek Ram. ….Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Harish Dod, Advocate vice Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has already made a representation against the order dated 18.04.2002 to the Commissioner-Cum-Secretary (Industries), Government of Himachal Pradesh on 11th July, 2002 (Annexure A-6). However, the same has not been decided till date. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Commissioner-Cum-Secretary (Industries), Government of Himachal Pradesh to decide the representation made by the petitioner vide Annexure A-6, dated 11th July, 2002 by passing a speaking order, within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. petitioner. The petitioner shall also be heard in person and for that purpose, he shall be notified the date of hearing. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 14, 2010. (bhupender)