IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1859 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- H U BHAMBHA Versus COMMISSIONER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR YV SHAH for Petitioners MR JR NANAVATI for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI Date of decision: 01/09/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the petition, the petitioner was considered for promotion and has been granted promotion. The petition is rendered infructuous. The petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. (D. M. Dharmadhikari, C.J.) pareekh