AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.1 OF 2008 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.38 OF 2006 Ms. Shehnaz Sani (Mudbhatkal) .... Petitioner Vs. Dr. Arvind Mudbhatkal .... Respondent The petitioner is present in person. The respondent is present in person. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATED : 19TH JANUARY, 2009. P.C.:- 1. Heard the petitioner and the respondent. No case is made out for review. Review petition is dismissed. 2. Ms. Shehnaz Sani-Mudbhatkal, the petitioner makes a grievance that the respondent Dr. Arvind Mudbhatkal is indulging in AJN 2 some criminal activities. If this is so, she may adopt, if she is so advised, appropriate remedies available to her in law. We, however, make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of her case and the court or authority seized of the matter shall deal with it independently and in accordance with law. 3. Needless to say that all contentions of both parties are kept open. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J.]