IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 17031 of 2007 Date of decision: 05.11.2007 Munish Kumar and another ..... Petitioners Versus State Bank of Patiala and another .....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.Kumar Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Mittal Present: Mr. A.K.Khunger, Advocate, for the petitioners. *** M.M.Kumar, J. It is admitted position that notices under Section 13 (2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for brevity 'the Act') was issued by respondent No. 2 to the petitioner on 11.08.2007 (P-1 and P-2). Thereafter, notice under Section 13 (4) of the Act has also been issued on 11.10.2007 (P-4). According to Section 17 of the Act, the remedy of appeal is available to the petitioner to challenge the notice under Section 13 (4) of the Act before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. In the presence of such a remedy the writ petition cannot be entertained. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed and we relegate the petitioner to seek remedy before the Tribunal as per law. ( M.M.KUMAR ) JUDGE (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE November 05, 2007 pj