IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2009 / 12TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 6785 of 2009(P) -------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- PRESIDENT, NEELAMPEROOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.1788, NEELAMPEROOR P.O., ALAPPUZHA DIST. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAVINDRAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE UNIT INSPECTOR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KAVALAM, KUTTANAD, ALAPPUZHA. 3. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI K.C. SANTHOSHKUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.C. NO. 6785 OF 2009 P -------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd March, 2009 JUDGMENT The prayers in the Writ Petition are as follows: “i) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P8 Appeal and Ext.P9 application for stay expeditiously. ii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the 1st respondent not to implement Ext.P6 order until the 3rd respondent takes a decision on the petitioner's application for stay.” 2. I heard Shri P. Ravindran, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader. Against the order of supersession passed under Section 32 of the Co-operative Societies Act, petitioner has preferred Ext. P8 Appeal and Ext.P9 stay petition. Learned senior counsel points out that till a decision is taken on the application, the order may be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed of WPC.6785/09 P 2 directing the third respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P9 in accordance with law, within two weeks from the date of production of a copy of this Judgment. The petitioner or his Representative will be present before the third respondent at 11 AM on 10.03.2009. Till such time as a decision is taken on Ext.P9, Ext.P6 order will not be implemented. Petitioner will produce a copy of this Judgment before the third respondent as soon as it is received. Sd/= K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge