IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35852 of 2009 MANOJ SAH S/O- MOTI SAH VILL- NEKNAM TOLA, P.S- BARHARA, DISTT- BHOJPUR, ARA.........................................................................................................................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ........................................................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 07.12.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case under Sections 328, 307, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not present at his shop when the sweet was sold to the informant of this case. The allegation is that as a result of having the sweets which contained intoxicating material the informant become senseless and thereafter he was robbed of his belonging. Considering the allegation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In case petitioner surrenders in the court below his application may be disposed of expeditiously without being prejudiced by this order. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)