IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 643 of 2009 Between: A.Ahamed Hussain, S/o. A.Nabi Saheb, R/o. D.No.15/59, Khadakpura, Kurnool, District: Kurnool. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Kurnool. 2 The Regional Transport Officer, O/o. Regional Transport Authority, Kurnool. 3 The Vigilance & Enforcement Officer, Vigilance & Enforcement Department, Kurnool. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings bearing R.No.7632/A1/2001 dated 24-08-2007 passed by the respondent No.2 as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and violative of the ratio laid down by this Hon'ble Court reported in "2003 (5) ALT 601-M.Muralidhar Reddy (died) and others Vs. Deputy Commissioner & Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Kurnool and others", violative of Principles of natural justice and mandatory provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 and the Rules there under and also violative of Articles 14, 19(1) (g) of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.V.RAMANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR TRANSPORT The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA W.P. No. 643 of 2009 O r d e r: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to quash proceedings dated 24.08.2007 issued by respondent No.2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and admitted to by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Transport that the issue raised in this writ petition is covered by the judgment of this Court in M. Muralidhar Reddy (died) and others v. Deputy Commissioner and Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Kurnool and others[1]. Following the said judgment, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the detailed reasons contained therein shall be read as part of this order. No costs. _______________ N.V.RAMANA,J Dated: 2nd March, 2009 KSR [1] 2003(5) ALT 601