IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 14TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 25TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 4712 of 2011(L) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- ZEENATH KABEER, W/O.KABEER, AGED 49, KAKKATTUTHARAYIL, THALIKULAM VILLAGE (P.O), CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.SAGEER IBRAHIM RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN- 685 001 2. DISTRICT COLLETOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR.680 569 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR.PIN- 680 569 4. AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, THALIKULAM P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN 680 569. 5. TAHASILDHAR, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT.PIN- 680 569 6. VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, THALIKULAM P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT.680 569 R1 TO R6 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.K. ARAVINDAKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 4712 of 2011 L ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 14th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T Prayers of the petitioner are as follows:- “(i) Call for the entire records leading upto Ext.P3 and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction. (ii) Issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction forbearing/ restraining the respondents No.1 to 5 from taking any action against the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P3 order till a decision is taken on Ext.P5 revision filed before the first respondent. (iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 revision filed by the petitioner under Section 28 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land Wetlands Act, 2008 in accordance with law after hearing the petitioner.” W.P.(C) No.4712/2011 : 2 : 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is constrained to approach this Court because of the coercive steps being taken by the respondents under the impugned proceedings. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances, the first respondent is directed to consider and pass final orders on Ext.P5 revision petition in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within two months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that all further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P4 shall be kept in abeyance till such time. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge