GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 10 OF 200 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 10 OF 200 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 10 OF 2004 Nandlal Sunderdas Balwani ... petitioner versus The Estate Officer & ors .... Respondents. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Nandlal Sunderdas Balwani - in person. Shri O.S.Kutty for Respondent. Ms. P.H.Kantharia APP for State. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & SMT. SMT. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 9TH MARCH, 2005 9TH MARCH, 2005 9TH MARCH, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The contempt alleged has taken place in the year 2002. Complaint was lodged in the year 2004. The complaint is of Criminal Contempt of Court under section 2(c) read with 15 of Contempt of Courts Act. Section 15 contemplates prior permission of the Advocate General to move such a petition. In the instant case there is no such prior permission of the Advocate General. The contempt proceedings are also barred by limitation as provided by section 20 of the Act. Hence petition is dismissed. ....