9§ \ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI§GARH A‘H‘ BILASPUR i I i I > > r WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1322 ofzoos {’ETITIONERS : 1. Bharat Singh, age 38 years, S/o. Lalanjoo Prasad, presently Wgrking as Lecturer, Govemmem Boys Highier Secondary School w Jashpumagar, Disn. Jashpur (C.G.) 2. Ashok Kumar Saiyam,% aged about 49 years, Son of Shri Bhuwan L31 Saiyam, presently working as Principle, ¥Naveen High School Koma, Janpad Panchayat — Duldula, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Chhatiisgarh, Raipur. 2. State of Madhya Pradesh, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal. 3. Cormnissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, State ofMadhya Pradesh, Bhopal (MP) 4. Commissioner, Deptt of Tribal, State of Chhattisgarh, Raigmr. 5. Union of Imiia, through the Ministry of Personnel, Pabiie Grievance and Pension. Department of Personnel and Training, Government of India, Khan Market, New Delhi. WRET PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA VERSUS SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri R.K.Kesharwani, Advocate for the petitioners. Siiri ASKachhwaha, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Shri Ajay Barik, Advocate on behalf of Shri S.K.Beriwa1, Standing Counsel for the Union of india. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 17m day of March, 2008) LA. No. 01. This is an application for amendment in the cause title. The application is ordereti as prayed for. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner undertakes tolmake necessary corrections during the course ofthe day. 1. Learned wunsel appearing for the petitioners suEmits mat he éoes not want to press this petitioa on merit except that the ipetitioners be pennitted to ‘ \ _ make a remesentation to the Committee in light‘ of ihe judgment and order dated 17m April, 2007 passed by this Court in Bi.R.Godbole Vs._Municipal Corperation Durg and others {2007(2) CGliJ 417}, to Whieh learned coumel appearing for the respondent/State haveino objection. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. the Committee so constituted is directed to consider the representations made by the petitioners, if their representations are not considered earlier. In the event, if it is not considered earlier, the desk representation may be considered, as early as possible within a period of four months from the date of receipt of representation. The representations may be considered keeping in mind the fact of residence and posting of the employee in one State and posting of the spouse in other State. This exercise on the part of the Government of India may be completed within a period of four months non} the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. ‘wl p Sd/_ ‘ I Satish K. Agnihntri' r ii r “Judge, " >.L~x:v:.