IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 24TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 5785 of 2007(L) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ M/S. U.K. TRADERS, N.H. ROAD, M.P.1077, UPPALA P.O., KASARAGOD, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, U.K. YOOSUF. BY ADV. SRI.K.SRIKUMAR, SRI.K.MANOJ CHANDRAN. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER (I.B.) COMMERCIAL TAXES, KASARAGOD. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, KASARAGOD. 3. THE INSPECTING ASST.COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXES, KASARAGOD. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.K.P. PRADEEP. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P (C) No. 5785 OF 2010 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 15th day of September, 2010 JUDGMENT The above Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the coercive proceedings taken by the respondents by way of Exts. P4 and P5 notices issued under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, without any regard to the pendency of Ext. P2 revision petition and Ext. P3 petition for stay preferred before the second respondent against Ext. P1 order imposing penalty. 2. When the matter came up for admission on 21.02.2007, notice was ordered to the respondents, also directing the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P3 petition for stay, if the same was pending, simultaneously intercepting with the coercive proceedings. 3. In appears that petitioner is no more aggrieved in any manner. There is no representation as well. In the said circumstances, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd