1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.3584 of 2009 (Narendra s/o Bhaurao Rekhe and others v. Ashok s/o Bhaurao Rekhe) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri P.S. Patil, Advocate for Petitioners. Coram : R.C. Chavan, J. Dated : 25 th August, 2009 This petition is directed against the concurrent findings by the learned Civil Judge and the District Judge holding that the petitioner is not entitled to an injunction in respect of Gat No.53/1 at Village Krushnapur. The learned Judges had confirmed injunction in respect of Gat Nos.77 and 52/2, since the petitioner had prima facie proved that he was in possession of those fields. Ownership of the petitioner based on a will executed by his father is one aspect and possession is a different aspect. Since the petitioner has not been able to show that he is in possession of Gat No.53/1, it cannot be said that the the learned Civil Judge or the District Judge erred in refusing injunction in respect of these fields. 2 Thus, the petition has no merit and it is, therefore, dismissed. Judge. pdl