IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-33450 of 2010 Date of decision : 25.3.2011 Azad …. Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …. Respondent Present: Mr. Raj Mohan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, AAG, Haryana. Ms. Monisha Lamba, Advocate for the complainant. *** S.S. SARON, J. Learned State counsel has submitted that the prosecution has examined all the witnesses in the case and the case is fixed for arguments before the learned trial Court on 8.4.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner has, however, submitted that an application has been filed under Section 319 CrPC for summoning Kalyan and Mahabir who according to the complainant are the main accused. It is submitted that Kalyan and Mahabir are summoned and a de novo trial would be held. In any case it is accepted that the application under Section 319 CrPC has not so far been decided. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition at this stage and file a fresh one in case the application under Section 319 CrPC is allowed. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage. (S.S. SARON) March 25, 2011 JUDGE amit