: 1 : SD IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.883 OF 2007 SECOND APPEAL NO.883 OF 2007 SECOND APPEAL NO.883 OF 2007 Dhondiram Mahadeo Sawant, Deceased, . Thru’ Hindurao M. Sawant ...Appellant V/s. Pandurang Chandru Satpute, Deceased, . Thru’ Akkatai Pandurang Satpute & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.N.V. Bandiwadekar, Advocate, for the Appellant. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATE : 25TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE : 25TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE : 25TH FEBRUARY, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.Bandiwadekar appearing for the appellant. 2. The appellant is the legal representative of the original plaintiff who filed a suit for removal of encroachment. The suit was dismissed by the Trial Court and the decree of the Trial Court was confirmed in the Appeal. 3. After having heard Mr.Bandiwadekar appearing for the appellant, I find that no substantial question of law is involved. Both the Courts below found that the appellant-plaintiff has failed to establish his title. The findings of the Courts below are based on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence on : 2 : record. 4. There is no error in the said findings. No substantial question of law arises. Second Appeal is accordingly dismissed. [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] [ABHAY S. OKA, J.]