28. cr appa 1068-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1068 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 623 OF 2010 Parshuram Bhim Dabhekar .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. Tejas Dande for the Applicant Mr. S.A. Shaikh, APP for the State CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J DATE : 9th SEPTEMBER, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant original accused no. 1 has been convicted under Section convicted under Section 498A and 304B of IPC. The appeal preferred by him against the said order has been admitted. Now, the applicant is seeking bail.. 3. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that there is no material to show that there was any demand for dowry or any harassment or any ill treatment to the deceased in connection with dowry. On going through the evidence, prima facie it appears that there is merit in this 1 28. cr appa 1068-10.doc contention. Further learned advocate for the applicant stated that besides this case, the applicant has a clean record. He further stated that the applicant was on bail during the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. Both these statements have not been controverted by learned APP Looking to all these facts, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. Hence, the following order: O R D E R 1. Applicant Parshuram Bhim Dabhekar be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 35,000/- [Rs. Thirty Five Thousand Only] each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The Applicant shall report to the Mahad Police Station once in a week till disposal of the appeal. 2. Application is allowed in above terms. [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 2 28. cr appa 1068-10.doc 3