- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6756 OF 2008 Siddhalingeshwar Bandappa Kadadi ..Petitioner v/s. Shri. Shrirang Govind Mahingade and ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.Amit Sale for the Petitioner. Mr.P.G.Sarda for the Respondents Nos.1 & 2. ... CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA , J. DATED: 24TH NOVEMBER, 2008 P.C.: 1. The Petitioner has being aggrieved by the order dated 23-7-2008, as his application to implead him as a Defendant is rejected. The property involved is Gat No.271. The suit is for declaration and injunction with regard to sell. The name of Nagappa who is grandfather of the Petitioner was shown in the 7/12 extract of Gat No.271. There is another suit pending with regard to same property, where the challenge is about the sale of the same property. 2. Taking all this into account, as the basic ingredient who should be the necessary party in such suit is made out and therefore to avoid the further - 2 - complications it is desirable that the applicant is made party to the proceedings. Therefore, without deciding any rights of the parties at this stage, I am inclined to grant the application, being application below Exh.16. The application is accordingly allowed. Petition is also allowed. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)