‘5 [oi-M 1m HIéH COURT QF QHHATTI5§ARH AT QILA§PUR Criminoi Appeai No.67? of 19§0 Aggiiggm Municipal (Jcrpgrm'ian, Raigw and 5mm of MP. Through 3.L.Langoté, Food Inspector, Raipur- (MP.§ (New (3.6.) Varsys Harihnl {Emma 5/0 Bhagwa?i Prasad Gupta, aged abouT 28 year's! firm Ehagwafi Prasad Bhikshaiai, éoibazarx as (APPLHMTIQN UNDER 5ECTLQN 378 (4) OF THE (REES. FOR LEAVE TC? APPEAL AGAKNST ACQUIT’TAL} Nan- applicau! Raipur (MR) (Now 6.6.) i (5g; Hm’b!5 gun TJ’. $hgrmg. JA I None appears far The applicant, Shri $RJ3aiswaL counsei for non-aypiicam. QRAL GRDER {Fassed on 10"” February; 2009) This appga! is direcTed against ‘me judgmam 0f aaquitm! datgd ( 39.14999 passgd by The Cihief Judigia! Magi5‘rmfg, Rcipur‘ in grinning! casa Ne.5938!80_ whgrgby The laarnad Chief Judicicé Mag§$+mm has acquifTed The {wing-Haw 0f The charge 0f Samar: 7 awed wifiq Section 16 cf m5 Fond Adukrgmiion Act 1954 (hareimf'rgr' mfarmd m as ‘fhe Am” 2. Fixed dam na'rice hog: bagn issuad m Tm appaHarw-Cerpam‘rion £21,}? appeimnt has ng‘f mgdmagpeamnce. This Is u. have ta appm! gndar Sgctien 3.78 (4) of (inRC, 3i Judgmam 9f asqui‘rm! is chaiknged an 'rhe greund ma? withau? Thar“: being (my pmva of sale 0f M5i Q?! Le, under warranty, ?ha mur‘r . ) \T/” @ bglgw has; qgquiTmd ma mn-gggliggm af Tha ghgrga and fhgmby mmmitmd an inezgwity, ’4, I hava hgard izarngd gaun$gl fer fhg nQn—applimm and piérusgd Tha judgmanf impugngd. 5* Ascending To casa 9f presgcutian, Tha nQn—apwicam 1mg shop-kegper- and was usa To safe {gods including Msi CM, Feed Inspgcfar pumhqsad AI$§ 0i! from Thg nen-appikan? and afmr fauawmgythe pmggdum pmsc’ribgd wcz$ sgm' far chzmigc! analygs, i same was found aduhemmd, Pmsgcmim agains‘r The nannapp!imnfr was hunched and noticg gmder Sec#i0n 13 (Z) 9f 'fha Ac? has bean issued against The nan-appHcdnt 6, Nan’applicant has Taken defame that hg has purchasgd said. 9i! “from solqnki Oi! Mm yidg ExDil and Focd Inspector has 'takgn samgle fmm sgaied containgr, fhamfare, he is mt MbQz fer (my pmsacution. He has examinad Subhqshchand Jain (DW—l), ewngr 0f The Sahnki Qi! AM”, Hg has specifica!!y smmd Thm’ he him $9M A!5§ Qil To thz nen-gppHcgnt Vida Exebll. 7, Mfg!" ggpm¢i¢ring thg wide-mg avaiiablg cm record, thg mar-1' balow has arrivgd air a finding “mat Fwd In$pgctar has mkgn sample from sadzd conminer which was purchased by ‘rhg nonzapp!icam fram Solanki Oil Mil! and Ex.D/1 cash mama is warranTy, ’rhamfam, The non-app!§c¢m1' is not liabka in accordamg WHh 5ectien 19 (Z) Qf the Ac'r and firming Thm the pmmcufim has not pmved. pzwhar‘ fact that me Fwd Inspector has taken sample fmm epgn mnmingr and m? from szgizd mnmingr' and in the light Qf sm‘tzmgnm 0f $ubhashchand Jain (DW—l) and Hazi Phu! Mohammad (DW—Z), thg sour-t halew has cmquittgd thg non-appiimm s, Judgmsm (if acqui’rm! against the. non-agpiicam is based, cm evidence avaihblg on racerd and. on *he basis of sm'remems 0f indepéndznt witnagg. The finding ef we muri‘ beiaw is juste, pmpgr and masombh 9, :Far- the faragoing masans, I do nm‘ find (my gmund fer gram of Mule :9 appgaL Cansgqugmgy, Th5 appga! bging dgveid. ef mzri’r is liablg Te ha kHsmissed and i‘!’ is hzrgby dismissed. Sd/— T. P. Sharma Judge 1 Bl-