IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER MONDAY, THE 18TH AUGUST 2008 / 27TH SRAVANA 1930 WA.No. 1247 of 2008(E) --------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.12205/2008 Dated 09/04/2008 .................... APPELLANT: PETITIONER IN WPC: -------------------------------------------------- ASOKAN, S/O.RAGHAVAN, AGED 55 YEARS, VILAYIL MOOLA, KEEZHATTINGAL, LIFE MEMBER, MOTHER INDIA INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MUHAMMED SRI.S.VIJI RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS IN WPC: --------------------------------------------------------- 1. SUDIN, PRINCIPAL AND MEMBER OF MOTHER INDIA INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL, KEEZHATTINGAL, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST. 2. CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, SHIKSHA CENTRE, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PREET VIHAR, DELHI-110 092. 3. SECRETARY, CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, SHIKSHA CENTRE, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PREET VIHAR, DELHI-110 092. WA.No. 1247 of 2008(E) :: 2 :: 4. THE REGIONAL OFFICER, CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, PLOT NO. 1630 A, J.BLOCK, 15TH MAIN ROAD, ANNA NAGAR, WEST CHENNAI. 5. THE PRESIDENT, MOTHER INDIA INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL, KEEZHATTINGAL, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 6. THE SECRETARY, MOTHER INDIA INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL, KEEZHATTINGAL, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L. DATTU, C.J. & A.K. BASHEER, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A. No. 1247 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 18th day of August, 2008 Judgment H.L. Dattu, C. J: Memo filed by the learned counsel for the appellant is taken on record. The memo reads as under: “That the petitioner is the appellant in the above Writ Appeal. The disputes between the parties involved in the case is settled out of court. The appellant is not intending to prosecute the case further. The above writ appeal may be dismissed as not pressed.” 2. In view of the memo, the writ appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU Chief Justice A.K. BASHEER Judge an.