IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS LETTERS LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.32 OF 2009 PATENT APPEAL NO.32 OF 2009 PATENT APPEAL NO.32 OF 2009 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.7241 OF 2008 PETITION NO.7241 OF 2008 PETITION NO.7241 OF 2008 Shri R.S. Salunkhe ..Petitioner V/s. The Managing Director, Maharashtra State Farming Corporation Ltd., & Anr. ..Respondents ALONGWITH LETTERS LETTERS LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.33 OF 2009 PATENT APPEAL NO.33 OF 2009 PATENT APPEAL NO.33 OF 2009 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.7230 OF 2008 PETITION NO.7230 OF 2008 PETITION NO.7230 OF 2008 Sukhdeo Shrirangrao Mahalankar ..Petitioner V/s. The Managing Director, Maharashtra State Farming Corporation Ltd., & Anr. ..Respondents ALONGWITH LETTERS LETTERS LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.34 OF 2009 PATENT APPEAL NO.34 OF 2009 PATENT APPEAL NO.34 OF 2009 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.7247 OF 2008 PETITION NO.7247 OF 2008 PETITION NO.7247 OF 2008 Shankarrao Vishwanathrao Deshmukh ..Petitioner V/s. The Managing Director, Maharashtra State Farming Corporation Ltd., & Anr. ..Respondents ALONGWITH LETTERS LETTERS LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.35 OF 2009 PATENT APPEAL NO.35 OF 2009 PATENT APPEAL NO.35 OF 2009 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.7226 OF 2008 PETITION NO.7226 OF 2008 PETITION NO.7226 OF 2008 Laxman Dattatraya Deshmukh ..Petitioner V/s. The Managing Director, Maharashtra State Farming Corporation Ltd., & Anr. ..Respondents : 2 : ALONGWITH LETTERS LETTERS LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.36 OF 2009 PATENT APPEAL NO.36 OF 2009 PATENT APPEAL NO.36 OF 2009 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.7250 OF 2008 PETITION NO.7250 OF 2008 PETITION NO.7250 OF 2008 Bhaskar Manikrao Mane ..Petitioner V/s. The Managing Director, Maharashtra State Farming Corporation Ltd., & Anr. ..Respondents .... Mr. Sugnadh Deshmukh for the Petitioners Mr. S.R. Nargolkar, AGP for Respondent State .... CORAM CORAM CORAM : SHRI J.N.PATEL & : SHRI J.N.PATEL & : SHRI J.N.PATEL & SHRI SHRI SHRI K.K.TATED, JJ. K.K.TATED, JJ. K.K.TATED, JJ. DATE DATE DATE :14TH JANUARY, 2009 :14TH JANUARY, 2009 :14TH JANUARY, 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. All these LPA’s can be disposed of by common order at the stage of admission. These LPA’s have impugned the order passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the petitions filed by the petitioners impugning the order passed by the District Judge, which is appellate authority under the Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955. 3. There is a concurrent finding of fact by the Labour Court as well as Industrial Court that the : 3 : petitioners’ services stood terminated as a consequence of Voluntary Retirement Scheme, which were opted by the petitioners. 3. In view of the fact that the accommodation was provided for the petitioners during the tenure of their services, they have no legal right to continue to hold service quarter and, therefore, the learned District Judge was right in dismissing their appeal. 4. We do not find any error or illegality in order passed by the learned Single Judge. Therefore, all these LPA’s stands dismissed with costs. 5. In view of the fact that this Court has dismissed the LPAs, the Civil Applications Nos.27/2009, 28/2009, 29/2009, 30/2009 and 31/2009 for grant of stay does not survive, therefore, stand dismissed. (J.N. (J.N. (J.N. Patel, J.) Patel, J.) Patel, J.) (K.K. (K.K. (K.K. Tated, J.) Tated, J.) Tated, J.)