1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 685 OF 2010 (Shayama Tukaram Sahare vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri T.A. Mirza, APP for the respondents. ….. CORAM : MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. MARCH 23, 2011. Heard. Vide judgment and order dated 31.03.2007, the petitioner – original accused No. 2 came to be convicted by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Gondia, in Sessions Trial No. 79 of 2005 under Sections 302 & 307 of Indian Penal Code. Being aggrieved by the said judgment and order, he has preferred Criminal Appeal No. 362 of 2007, which is pending before this Court. On the request of the petitioner Shri Vinay Dahat, Advocate from the legal aid penal was appointed to represent him. Now, the petitioner has preferred this petition through jail with a request that Shri Rajendra M. Daga, Advocate be appointed to represent him in the appeal. Shri Rajendra M. Daga, Advocate has kindly 2 consented to appear for the petitioner in the appeal. Hence the prayer of the petitioner to appoint Shri Rajendra M. Daga, Advocate to represent him in the appeal is allowed. Consequently, Shri Vinay Dahat, Advocate is discharged from the case. Office to prepare paper book expeditiously and thereafter place the matter on final hearing board. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.