1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition (MD)No.13339 of 2011 T.Gopalakrishnan, S/o.S.Narayana Perumal @ Thangavel ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Principal, Kendriya Vidyalaya, Konam, Nagercoil-4, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 10.11.2011. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sankar Prakash For Respondent-1 : Mr.V.Pandi, Government Advocate. ORDER [Order of the Court was made K.N.BASHA, J] Mr.V.Pandi, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for respondent-1. In view of the order which we propose to pass protecting the interest of the 2nd respondent also, we are of the view that no notice need be sent to the 2nd respondent at this stage. 2.By mutual consent of the counsel on either side, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing at the time of admission itself. 3.The petitioner has come forward with this petition praying for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider his representation, dated 10.11.2011. 4.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the 2nd respondent is trying to construct a wall blocking the common pathway leading to burial ground as well as temple. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he has made a representation to the 1st respondent on 10.11.2011, the same was not considered and hence he was constrained to approach this Court with the present petition with the aforesaid prayer. 5.Heard the learned Government Advocate appearing for respondent No.1 on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 6.We have carefully considered the submissions made by the counsel on either side and also perused the materials available on record. 7.In view of the limited prayer made, this Court, without going into the merits of the representation of the petitioner and without expressing any view on such representation, is constrained to direct the 1st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 10.11.2011, by affording an opportunity to the petitioner as well as to the 2nd respondent and also to other relevant parties, by sending notices, and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall furnish a fresh copy of his representation, dated 10.11.2011, to the 1st respondent, along with a copy of this order, within ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8.With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AS) / True Copy / Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Principal, Kendriya Vidyalaya, Konam, Nagercoil-4, Kanyakumari District. +1CC TO MR.C.SANKAR PRAKASH, ADVOCATE SR : 41000 Gb SR : 24.11.2011 : 2p/4c : IT Order in W.P.(MD)No.13339/2011 Dated:23.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/