[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2441 OF 2008 Sanjay Nagnath Parde and Anr. ..Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Or. ..Respondents ... Mr.Ashok B.Tajane Advocate for Applicants Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : AUGUST 20, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 20, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 20, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking anticipatory bail in CR No.41 of 2008 of Madha Police Station, Dist.Solapur. The said case is mainly under Section 326 of IPC. 3. The statement of the complainant shows that the present applicant along with others assaulted five persons including Vijaykumar Parde, Ajit Parde, Subhash Parde and Abhijeet Parde. Vijaykumar sustained 9 injuries in the incident. Out of these nine injuries, four injuries were CLWs on the head. Vijaykumar also sustained fracture of the [-2-] hand. Ajit sustained one injury i.e. contused wound on the head. Subhash sustained five injuries in the incident including two contused lacerated wounds on the head and fracture of the hand. Abhijeet sustained three injuries in the incident, one of the injuries was on the head. The role attributed to the applicants is that applicant no.2 Ramesh assaulted Ajit Parde on the head with an iron rod. The role attributed to applicant no.1 Sanjay is that he along with other accused assaulted every one with stick and caused grievous injuries. 4. The learned advocate for the applicants submitted that there is a cross case and the applicants were also injured. Injury certificates of the applicants have been produced. It is seen that injuries sustained by both the applicants are simple in nature. In the present case, the applicants have been named in the FIR. Their role in the incident is also stated in the FIR. Looking to this fact and the injuries sustained by four of the witnesses as stated above, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail, hence, application is rejected. [-3-] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]