WP(C) 5607/2006 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE BD AGARWAL JUDGEMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) Heard Mr. AK Maheswari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. Mu nir, learned Govt. counsel appearing for the official respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed with a limited prayer to direct the re spondents to pay the arrear as well as current salary on the premise that she wa s appointed as Assistant teacher in the year 1989 and thereafter she joined the said post at Khajua Block LP School on 1.1.90. According to the petitioner, she is working in the said school from 1.1.90 till date and despite that the respon dents stopped her salary intermittently. According to the petitioner, for non pa yment of the salary, a writ petition was filed in the year 1990 being CR No. 175 9 of 1990. While disposing of the said writ petition, this court directed the Go vt. to clear the pay and allowance for the period they have rendered service in the respective schools. After the aforesaid order, the Govt. terminated the serv ices of good number of teachers and again stopped salary of the petitioner from 1994, which prompted the petitioner and few other teachers to file another writ petition, being CR No. 4971 of 1994. The said writ petition was disposed of by this court on 14.2.96 directing the respondents to examine if other teachers app ointed by the same order were regularized in the service, the petitioner shall a lso be given the same benefit. This court also observed that if the petitioners were terminated from the services without any notice, such termination order sha ll stand set aside. 3. According to the learned counsel, despite the aforesaid order dated 14.2 .96, salary was not paid, which compelled the petitioner to file another writ pe tition being CR No. 3103 of 1998. During this period, the Govt. had advertised f or filling up the few posts of Asstt. Teachers. Hence, the advertisement was als o challenged. Accordingly, an interim order was passed to keep 12 posts of teach ers vacant. After filing of the writ petition, the Govt. cleared the salary up t o April, 2003 and thereafter the payment of salary was again stopped. 4. In the affidavit of the State respondents, it has been pleaded that the petitioner was released from service after payment of 29 months salary. However, a copy of the order of termination/discharge of the petitioner from service has not been annexed with the affidavit. Be that as it may, in the order dated 14.2 .96 passed in CR No. 4971 of 1994 of 94, this court has observed that if the te rmination order was passed without any notice, the same shall stand set aside. B esides this, the petitioner has annexed a certificate from the Headmaster of Kha jua Block LP School dated 14.8.2006 wherein the Headmaster has certified that t he writ petitioner is performing her duty as Asstt. Teacher since 1.1.1990 till date. 5. In view of the aforesaid position, the respondents are hereby directed t o make payment of entire arrear salary and also continue to pay current salary w ithout any break, so long the petitioner is in service. An endeavour shall be ma de to clear the arrear salary within a period of three months from the date of r eceipt of a certified copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.