IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-5885 of 2010 Date of decision : 04.10.2010 Shanti ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. B.S. Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Malik, A.A.G., Haryana **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned State Counsel submitted that charges have been framed in this case and even co-accused of the petitioner has filed the revision petition, which is still pending before the Sessions Judge. 2. Faced with the situation, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioner to raise all the points involved in the instant petition at the time of challenging the order of framing charge before the Sessions Judge along with application of condonation of delay or at any subsequent stage in the trial Court. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Needless to say that the concerned Court would consider the application for condonation of delay sympathetically. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge October 04, 2010 naresh.k