IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2008 / 18TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 35657 of 2007(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- MALLIKARJUNA RAU, LEKSHMI VILASOM, PANAMPATTA MURI, PIDAVOOR P.O., PATHANAPURAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN SRI.M.R.SASITH RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. ADDL.THAHSILDAR, OFFICE OF THE ADDL.THAHSILDAR, PATHANAPURAM, PUNALOOR. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM. 3. LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, PUBLIC OFFICE, OPPOSITE MUSEUM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 35657 OF 2007 T ===================== Dated this the 8th day of January, 2008 J U D G M E N T When the writ petition was considered on 12/12/2007, the statement made by the petitioner of having filed Ext.P2 revision before the 3rd respondent was contradicted by the learned Government Pleader pointing out that the same has not been received. The case was adjourned with a direction to the petitioner to produce proof of filing of Ext.P2. Even today, this has not been done, which necessarily leads to the inference that no such revision has been filed. In view of the above, on merits also this writ petition is to be dismissed and I do so. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp