CWP No.89 of 2006. 21.10.2008 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 3. Mr. Anup Rattan, Central Government Counsel for respondent No.4. Mr. Bimal Gupta has drawn the attention of the Court to communication dated 6th October, 2005 (Annexure R-4/1) issued by the Government of India (Banking Division). He submits that clause 3 of this communication has not been implemented in letter and spirit by the sponsor bank. In other words, his submission is that the sponsor bank has not entered into any negotiations with RRBs with regard to payment of allowances. Consequently, the sponsor bank, i.e. respondent No.3 is directed to enter into negotiations with respondent No.1 bank to determine the other allowances as per clause 3 of the communication dated 6th October, 2005 within a period of three months from today. Mr. Ramakant Sharma has drawn the attention of the Court to circular letter dated 9th June, 2008 whereby it had been decided that the RRBs shall charge the interest on clean OD facility as prevailing in the sponsor bank from its employees. Mr. Sharma further submits that the interest will be charged from the petitioners on the basis of circular letter No.22/08 dated 9.6.2008 alone. He undertakes that the interest paid by the petitioner in interregnum during the pendency of the petition shall be protected and no recoveries shall be effected from them. In view of the observations made hereinabove, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. October 21, 2008 (sck). (Rajiv Sharma), J.