IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 10TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 21ST MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 32189 of 2008(F) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- RAJAMMA, W/O MADHAVANPILLAI, RESIDING AT RAHUL BHAVAN, PULITHITTA KOYIKAL, THULAMPARAMBU, THEKKUMMURI, HARIPAD. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.PRADEEP RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, LAND REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR, SURVEY & LAND RECORDS, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF SURVEY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.SANDESH RAJA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 32189 OF 2008 (F) ==================== Dated this the 10th day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that she made Ext.P1 application to the 2nd respondent praying for the survey of her property situated in Sy.No.283/1A of Perumpatty Village. According to the petitioner, under cover of Ext.P2, the 2nd respondent has forwarded Ext.P1 to the 3rd respondent for necessary action. There is no response from the 3rd respondent. On behalf of the petitioner, Ext.P3 letter was given to the 3rd respondent, which also was not responded. It is in these circumstances, the writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to consider Ext.P1 application made by the petitioner. 2. As already noticed, Ext.P1 was made to the 2nd respondent, who in turn has forwarded it to the 3rd respondent under cover of Ext.P2 with a direction to prepare a report on the request made in Ext.P1. The complaint of the petitioner is regarding the inaction of the 3rd respondent on Exts. P2 and P3. In these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P1 and pass orders thereon. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 3 months of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp