CWt 2/2Z/ IN THE HON'BLE HIeH couRT OF cHHATTIseARH AT BILAsPuR WRIT Perm-ION (s) Nagg lg g /2oo9 PETITIONER ’G/afir'am Jolhe, aged about 54 years, Son of Shri Mohitram Jolhe, posted as “Head Masmr'", a1 Govt Middle School- Gafadih, Block & Tahsil- Sarangar'h, Disff- Raigarh (CG‘) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. f The 5mm of Chhaffisgarh, Through— The Secretary, Departmenf of School g: ‘ Educa?ion, Man‘rr‘alaya, Dau Kalyan Singh t/ Bhawan, Raipur' (C.6.) The Disfr'ic‘r Education Officer, DisTricf — Raigar'h (C.6.) WRIT PETI‘IION U/A — 226 OF THE CONS‘ITTUHON OF INDIA ‘ Gowri , HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR 99 WRIT PETITION (S) No.6348 OF 2009 PETITIONER Gatiram Jolhe Versus The State of Chhattisgarh & Another (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Roop Naik, counsel for the petitioner. RESPONDENTS Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Adv. General for the State. ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 5 day of November, 2009) dated 3-1-1994 and grant relief accordingly. 5. In view of foregoing, the writ petition is disposed of. sdl‘ Agd‘“°“‘ § Satts“ K. 3udge With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petition heard finally. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay scale of Rs.100/- for a period of two years. After completion of two years probation, the petitioner was granted regular pay scale: Learned counsel further submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment or after completion Of probation period. .3. The issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur (for short “the SAT”) in O.A.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court, upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled ‘to regular pay scale from date of initial appointment. 4. In view of the above submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disp’osed of in the same terms i.e., the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation, if so advised, to consider the petitioner’s case, if the petitioner stand on the same footings as per order passed by the SAT in Madhukant Yadu (supra) and subsequently confirmed by the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93 by order