IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.98 of 2008 TASLIMA KHATOON D/O- NASRUDDIN KHAN, R/O- VILLAGE NAI BAZAR, P.S.- CENTRAL JAIL BUXAR, DISTRICT- BUXAR, AT PRESENT VILLAGE CHAKIYA, P.S.- BUXAR, DISTRICT- BUXAR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. NASRUDDIN KHAN @ BUTRU SON OF LATE SADRUDDIN KHAN R/O- MOHALLA- NEW BAZAR NEAR BARI MASIJID, BUXAR, P.O.- NEW BAZAR, P.S.- NEW BAZAR, DIST.- BUXAR. For the petitioner : Mr. Ashwini Kumar Rai, Advocate. For the O.P. no. 2 : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumar no. 1. APP ----------- 3 25.08.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner (wife) is aggrieved by the present order dated 1.12.2007 whereby her application filed for enhancement filed under Section 127(2) has been considered and rejected. Earlier the petitioner had filed an application in the year 1994. On a consideration of the materials placed on record, the same was allowed by order dated 27.5.1998 and the husband (O.P. herein) was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 300/- (three hundred) per month. Subsequently the present application was filed. From perusal of the order impugned, it appears that the husband was found aged about 67 years on the date of order. It has further been found and recorded that he was weak and was not able to earn for himself. The wife has failed to demonstrate any fixed income of the husband. The plea of sparkling inflation raised by the petitioner was considered to be affecting both the parties. In these circumstances, learned court below refused to allow the application. 2 After having heard both sides and after going through the materials placed on record including the impugned order, this Court is satisfied that no illegality as such has been committed by the Court below in consideration of the matter. There is no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )