IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10667 of 2010 1. RAM JATAN KEWAT S/O LATE NANHAK KEWAT R/O VILL.- DAMUHA, POST- SAIDABAD, P.S.- KAKO, DISTT.- JEHANABAD ---- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, JEHANABAD 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA 4. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, AURANGABAD 5. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ARWAL 6. MINES & MINERAL OFFICER, JEHANABAD AT P.O. JEHANABAD 7. E.N.C. ENTERPRISES KHARI NAG AT P.S. AND P.O. AND DISTT.- HAZARIBAGH THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR ---- RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 13.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that Balu Ghats have been settled for the year 2010-11 to the private persons. The grievance of the petitioner in the representation contained in annexure 3 is that the settlement has been made contrary to the Government Order No. 261 dated 12.2.1981. It is also stated that certain Jalkars were settled in the petitioner’s society and that the Collector, Jehanabad and the Collector, Mines should ask the parties to deposit the settled amount with the authorities concerned. I do not see how the petitioner is concerned with these affairs. The Collector, Jehanabad and the Mines Officer of Jehanabad would be performing their duties and ensuring that the parties who have been settled the Balu Ghats would be acting in accordance with law. This writ application is dismissed. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)