IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23019 of 2010 TINKU KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 28.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Parties have compromised and two of the co-accused persons have been allowed bail but allegation against this petitioner is specific about abuse in name of informant’s caste for constituting offence under Section 3 (I)(X) of the S.C./S.T. (prevention of atrocities) Act for which anticipatory bail is not maintainable. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. However, petitioner is directed to surrender before the Court below and pray for regular bail which shall be decided, taking into the compromise between the parties, without being prejudiced by this rejection order. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)