^y;i»s <t iW mi®8iea c^- ^^orcHHftna^i^BE ATBIIASRJi? W.R@, ]L|S°S /" Ss^wS^&Ss^ 9/0 Sa CJBt. Sate /" 4& ywrs, flested as »--".\ '?•"•" ...i>r~ ^•y-'-' ^.^•^*E-*i'' '"^^ Assl^aait Te^&er, 8/a Qr.Ko.E- S3©» B^F.P.S, 1^cba*t N^ai, isfaact Kaiia tC.O.) ^ I. State©fC3thafla^aA Tfef&a^ : Tbe Efe-eetor RifaKc pe&oot Edaeattoa^ :A 3. €. CKiattiqgarb State gleetrid^ SwiEd A body GOTp&.tatse ttoou^i SeeretsayISta^xaya.Ss^iixF^.G^} %dyut 3Sa^ff' Sta&saha Saariti &e Seeretaiy Korba West^Q.1 The BSstifct ESdacafioa Offieer Kw^iSi, Msttifit KOEte^C^S^ T^e ftaMapaI ^ayut C^Qi, {fi^her SeKondsiay Sehool, %3yut Sassec Darri, Korba (C.G.} wmt wgsrm'Wt UNBER Amici£ 226 OF THS CQNCTrFV®G»OP SBMA PQR ISSIJAIfGE €>PWSIT IN N.KffS^, MKSB/^SJS C@ EORA8Y 7T n Arun ^ Pethjoner RiBSBondent HSQH COURT OF CWHATTISGARH AT BltASPUR WRTT PETITION (S) N0.1459 <rf2010 :BabuLalS8hu , i: ' Vereus State of Ghhattisqarh & othere WRIT PET1TION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. ^nihotri, J.) Preswit:- Shri C.R. Sahu, Advocaf for tfie petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) Passed on 51h DayofApifl.2010) \ 1. Leamed counsel ^ippearing for the pettioner, on instoucBons/submHa that the patitioner does not want to contest this patiUon on merite at this stage and seeks permlssion of this Caurt to wittidraw thte petition with tiberty to make a representation to the respondent No. 3. 2. It is ordered accordingly. 3. Consequently, ttie writ petiUon is dtemissed as wBhAawn wtth the aforestated liberty. i~ -- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge