1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO.2029 OF 2006 M/s. Insite Advertising Services ..Petitioner. Vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation & anr. ..Respondents. ... Mr. Pradhyaman Bhagat for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. ... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 1st August, 2006. P.C. : Mentioned. Not on Board. By consent taken up for admission. The Employees' Insurance Court has observed that the proceedings had been made time bound on a direction of this Court. Arguments have been advanced before the Employees' Insurance Court and the matter has virtually been concluded. In any event, the interference of this Court in a purely interlocutory order of the Court below passed on an application for admission of documents, answering interrogatories and issuance of a witness summons does not warrant interference at this stage. However, it is clarified that should it become necessary 2 for the Petitioner to do so, it would be open to the Petitioner to challenge the final order of the Insurance Court on all grounds including in regard to the correctness of the orders which are impugned in these proceedings. The Petition is dismissed.