IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 13TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 22ND KARTHIKA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3360 of 2008() ------------------------------------------ CMP. NO.1`340/2008 IN ST. 79/2008 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT- II, THODUPUZHA. .......... REVN. PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER/ACCUSED:- ----------------------------------------- SALMA K.S., KUNNUPURATHU HOUSE, VANNAPURAM P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGEKUTTY MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): COUNTER PETITIONER/COMPLAINT & STATE:- -------------------------- 1. SREE GOKULAM CHIT AND FINANCE CO (P), 356 ARCOT ROAD, KODAMPAKKAM, CHENNAI, REP. BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR. A.B.SANTHOSH, S/O VIJAYABHANU, ASST. MANAGER, THODUPUZHA BRANCH. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.S.U.NAZAR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. ........................................... CRL.R.P.NO. 3360 OF 2008 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 13th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2008 ORDER Revision petition is filed challenging the order in CMP 1340 of 2008 passed by Judicial First Class Magistrate, Thodupuzha in S.T.79 of 2008, a complaint filed alleging commission of offence under Section 138 of N.I.Act. CMP 1340of 2008 was filed by revision petitioner/accused to send Ext.P9 cheque alleged to be forged to an expert. Case of petitioner is that the entries in the cheque and the signatures are different and were written in different handwriting and therefore they are to be forwarded to an expert for his opinion after comparing with the admitted handwriting of the revision petitioner. Learned Magistrate dismissed the application holding that there is no case for complainant that handwriting is that of revision petitioner. In such circumstances, I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the order warranting interference. Revision petition is dismissed. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE lgk/-