IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1236 OF 2008 in SUIT NO. 1430 OF 2008 Mr.Anil Saroj ....Plainitff vs Smt Radhadevi Ramji Singh .. Defendants . Mr.Sanjay Kadam a/w Ms Khavnekar i.b M/s Kadam & Co for Plff Ms Dipti Panda i..b Mr.K.R.Shekhawat for Deft nos. 1 to 4 CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATE : 16TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. The Chamber summons is taken out by the defendants for directions to the plaintiff to give inspection of the photocopies of the documents listed in schedule I annexed to the chamber summons. There are 15 documents shown in the schedule. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has filed reply. Along with the reply they have annexed a letter dt.14.11.08 written by them to the defendants. The letter is annexed at Exhibit B. This letter shows that on 16.7.08 the plaintiff has given inspection of the papers and documents in High Court premises list of which is given in para b. Copies of those documents are already given to the defendants. 2. Ld.counsel for the defendants submitted that copies of the documents mentioned in the schedule are given by the plaintiff. However, inspection of the original documents have not been given by the plaintiff. The plaintiff in this regard in para 12 of his reply has stated as follows : “With reference to paragraph (1) I state that some of these documents have been signed, sealed and delivered by the defendant’s themselves and some of the residuary documents are addressed to defendants by the concerned persons/authority. Thus it is obvious through the normal course of action that the originals of the same are till date in the custody of the concerned person/authority themselves or with the defendants and thus I am justified in giving photographs of the same. “ The defendants have not disputed the plaintiff's averments made in the reply particularly the averments in para 12. In the above circumstances, I find no merit in the chamber summons. Chamber summons is dismissed. R. V. MORE, J.