RETITrONER Defendant Nb.3 i%\^-^- INTHEHIGHCOURTOFt^HATTISGAI^ATBILASE^ WRIffiRETITION f22%)^NoA.^6^?.72009 RESPE);NE)®?1?S;||| Pla.mfiff1.-^'..1;';',®-;. ^ .4. M ^ .Revti|Raman.,^ageai^al3pufr55^ea.rs,':S/o? '•• late fDa.modar Prasad';Tiwa.ri,^By'^ca.ste,' , Bra.yrnin. R/'6^Nakapara^3nain?,Eoa3;;. ,:CKarama;Bi&tf..-KsnKgK,(;@.G^)'^^Y[:,t S,i: :VERSlJS.^.^y:.tj'^'^^.^:'^ ty;®B3^dELaREa;sa.(t,(Si:nee^aied),jS^ '©aimQdaF ^lI:>F|^(3^^^sie[BraKmin^^ed?ab®uf'Sg[:^ ^^.%%^^@^gg.;:,.^':,... ,.;^^ |^:n3a»Bnl|@Kiia:sHan;I^sad/o'^D^ ^:;;.%asa^^l3%^ast&;BraHmirr-agedlSa^out-57;' /years,:^y:.:;,::.,:...,,.i::,-:,1^.,:,".^.^ .Both'respondehCs; R;/o <3harariia:TahsiI^^^^^^^ :'l:Cyarama^Distf.:.BaMar.(©.G,)r^M'g:?|:!;/:'^ ;^(3^aTiga^ai.i:E^'o,©alnQ3aE,I3rasad^|l^ ^^BrajlitEUn?ageS;<aj3out;;S0.;:ye!SES^^ .^,©ayatFi?Ba^^:^wI^modai-:F>rSsa.d.a8%Ca.ste^ BTaKritiri-^e<l''aBo'uti|57.'ygaa'S,i,^. 3: ^; RespoifdeiWrto. -i:5^and;4'.R/?o" (Shar^ma, '-^TalisiKCh&r^a^Btstt^E&star^e^ ;g^TKe^Si^i;te;;©£|@li^^sgarlT;:tliro^ 3'GoHe®^?^laiS|Bis^S<JagaalpW^ WrRl'T PETltION^NDER^ARTieLE 227 OF%HE i:fe' .';':,^;:::S,GC>NS^ITIJ^QN30FiINmA^';-l.!:^^ I'ai'ticular OtfltiKeiEetittoaeri:- •wr: < "^. ;i-ifc^ ;¥sl: 1 L^.fc B^ ; .I^J i^r^ ^^i>li^.^.^ Hl SinalsBenGteHan'bleShriJUstiGePt'ashaintKun^M^tra PEKTiONER RESRONDENTS WrttPetitioii(2271No.SS6<}f28Q8 RevtiRainah Qharda Prasad and others. ShriPara9KoteGha,counselfo!-thepetifione!r. ShriRaytndFaAgravral,cQunselforrespondent 3.2. ShriAjitSir^ft, f^n^l.^w^lciF^eSt^e.fr^onyeBt^^ Noneforotherre^OndentiSthoighserved., ^wrpETinoMyNDERiftRffict.Biatt (2) Durir^thependencyoTthesuitpreferredby Tiwari and Laxrhi Bhusten Prasad, Uie said Prasaddte^isnQ4-®7-2€X)3i'Ffe^air liication umler '©TdSF;22i fyl^^<s(MKjl( /(Sffar* ffi li|:!l: it ffe s ca^oneaW:;Qpder:'2Z:Ruff.3-G^Pl.S.).f6r:B legal represeFrtaftives of steGea^d Sharda n^er was fixed for eyMerfce^ <^ substitutfen of ^81 repi'esierrtaSves. The ^ness^s^M^ petftiQnerftiefer^Rt ^re^pres^^ CT npt t^examineet fe pay^trf (^ :l^^:'.;i.iil:ill'^'i:i3"?'? ^•-Q3-2Q08^:the;']defeRdat^.:'Nci^,|,-&.,'2^;we^t^ ^ (5) ^? ^ -:a--: (3) Ttie petitioner (ater on moyed an apptteati%i undw Sectjon 151 of C.P.C. seetgng one oppwtunity to teeKl evklence on the quesUon of iETipleadment of tegal r^sresentattves of the deeeasedplaintiff.ThisspplicatstmhasbeenTejectedbythe in^sygned ordsr. (4) Qn perusal of the onler-ste^s of the trial Goyrt, st wouid a^ear that the p^ittoner's ^ness^ ^re preserft x^ 2Q-Q3-2W^ but couW mrt be examtriesibecause of paucity of tims, thereforethe present is^notft^3ase^^fe^^ had always fcreen norl^-Get^rai^^oretietridGoy^^^ was always aft (^fautt. It fe tn» at the issue reganijm impteadmen^,i^ro^^?p^ii®:befc»rethe trial Court f8F eilmost a year, yet ance tt^ petitioner irtends to tead evidence and for that his witnesses were aiso presKit on 28- 03-2008, endsofjustfcs would be served if the p^itioner is allowedone opportunftyto leadevidence oRpaymeRtoSiKist of wtKa direetioils to to compen^rteths Qf^?QSite pgsrty. lntheFesylt,th!swffi3^ttonfei the trial Court to atlow ths petitioner td tm the questiori of unpteadment of tega! representattveg of deceasey/ptairrtiffShardaPra^adTiwari- produce his wtnesses on one sn^te date to bejB<^ tsy jthe tria! Court. T'hepetitiQner^iallpayc^tofRs.1,00(%-tejthe (6) TTie Wit petition is ^ ::^ Sd^-' -i Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge ^ i:'i ••:.: 1-;1-