IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30470 of 2010 MD. RAFATULLAH, S/o Md. Amirul Haque. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.30447 of 2010 SANJAY @ AJAY MAHATO, S/o Dhuri Mahato. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 08.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 413, 414, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioners were arrested on suspicion being dealer of stolen vehicles but there was no recovery from their possession and apart from one parent case of theft of the vehicle which was recovered at the spot the petitioners have no criminal antecedents which fact will be verified by the Magistrate concerned before releasing the petitioner on bail. Considering the same, let the petitioners, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Basantpur P.S. Case No. 27 of 2010 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the 2 bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and the other bailor shall be the father of the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)