^fc^ HIGI+COURTOF CHHATnSBARk BILASPUR APPELLANTS/: (Defendants) RESPONDE^TS/: (Ptaintiffs) < •ifel-'. (Defendants) f: ^! Misc. CivilCase(PR) No.1812 <rf2008 1. Ramadhar, S/o Amar Singh Teli, aged about 62 years: 2. Shh/adhar, S/6 Amar Singh Teli, aged about 57 years. All are R/o Vlllag^ Dokala, Tahsil Charama, Distt. North Baster Kanker Versus 1. Kumari Bai, W/oGhamar Ram, aged about 55 years, R/o Village Ramtara, TahsilGurur, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 2. Daya Bai, D/o Rambharosa, aged about 40 years, R/o \^llage Dokala, Tahsil Charama, Dlstt. Norlh Baster tonker 3. Uma Bai, D/o Krishana Kumar Sahu, aged about 37 years, R/o Village Lajouda.Tahsil Ifondagaon, Distt. North Baster Kanker (C.G.) 4. Pyari Baj, W/o Ajay Kumar Sahu, aged about 35 yeare, R/o VMage Dokala, Tahsil Charama, Distt. North Baster l<^nker(C.G.) 5. Kushram, S/o Rambharosa, Teli, aged about 52 years, R/o Village Dokala, Tahsil Charama, Distt. North Baster Kanker (C.G.) 6. Nandkumar, S/o Rambharosa, Teli. aged about 47 years, R/o Village Dokala, Tahsil Charama, Distt. North Baster Kanker (C.G.) 7. Assi Kumar (died) through LRs. (A)Smt. Wamin, Wd/o Assi KumaF, agedabout 50 years. (B) Jaymal, S/o Assi Kumar, aged aboirt 32years. (C)Mut<esh, S/o Assi Kumar, aged about26years. (D) Lata, D/o Assi Kumar, aged about 29years. (E) Kavita, D/o Assi Kumar, aged about 23yeara. f,. r! /: '^~.- Soma f: &'- (F)l-lasina, D/oAssi Kumar, agedabout ISyears. All are R/o Village Dokala, Tahsil Charama, Distt. North Baster Kanker 8. State oT Chhatti^iarh, through the Colltetor, Kariker, Distt. North Baster l^inker(C.G.) {Application for redioration} Present: No.8. Mr. Nitesh Pant, counsel for the appellants. Mr. Neelendu Naha Roy, Panel Law^r for the State/respondent Division Bench: Hon'ble Mr. TP. Shama and Hoh'bleMr.R.L.Jhanwar.JJ. ORM-OFmER (14-9-2009) 1. This isan application for restoratioRofSeeonclAppeal No.16/2008 whieh was dismissed in defeult of the appellants. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants has removed the default pointed out bythe Registry.in flllng this application. 3. Second Appeal No.16/2008 has been dlsmissed on 30-4-2008 for want of prosecutlon. 4.'0n due consideration, we are satisfied that counsel the appellantswas prevented by suffieient reason from appearing beforethis Court when the case was called for hearino. The applicatlon for restoratlon is allowed. Second Appeal No.16/2008 be restored to its original number. No order astocosts. FS<V- R.L. Jhaiiwar Sd/- | ; Judge T.P. Sharma Judge \ ' ^: • ! 'i)..SSL^^^^-.tt^.^tL^^^