dl 408 1 1I lE FIlGHCOURT Ol P1JNJA13ANDI IARYANA A1 1 1 CHANIARH 44 loateofDeeisionlMarchl 2011 lIA No730of2009 t11 Shasbi kumar andothers AppellaillS VcrsllS CommlssionerHaryan1 1Itldothers espondcnts 1PA No31 of2009 21 ShashiKulnar andothers lppcllants t V c rsus Financial Commissionerl Iaryttna aild others espondents 31 PA No732 of 2009 ShashiKulnar Ippellant Vcrsus FinancialColnmissioner11arvanaandothers lespondelll 411 LPA No733 of2009 ShashiKunlar and others AppelliilllS VersllS FinancialColnmissionerI laryanaalld others espunclenls 51 LPA No734 of20119 ShashiKumar and others 4ppcllaltls Versus 1 and others esp0ndcnt5 Singh Gagan Preet 2012.11.29 13: 14 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 409 e 6 1PA NI735 of2009 1 r3 WK ShashiKumar andothers Iploellanls Versus FinancialCoinmissionerHaryantt arldolhers Respondenls 71 WP No10684 of2001 Surtaet Petitioners Versus Stateof Harvanaandothers 2espondenls 81 CWP No15051 of2001 1 4 BangiRanl and another etitioncrs 1 ll VerSUS P 4 0 StateofHarvanaandothcrs Respondeilts e e 91 CWP No18577 of2001 e j 1 ShashiKuinar and others etitioncrs C 3 Versus P 0 StateofHaryana and others 610 CWP N0012353of 1991 Omarkash andothers etitioncrs Versus StateoHaryana andothers Respondent 119 RSA Noe2747 of2009 Nathi Rarnandlinother Appellalll VerSliS Shashi Kurnar espondenl Singh Gagan Preet 2012.11.29 13: 14 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document r 410 4 9 RSANo2748tIf2009 9 1 21 tr Vpr lppellatll surtaand otherS VersUS Chhaviandothers RSANo149 of 2009 131 Ippellant Dauli Versus espondent Shshi Kuinar RSANt2750 of2009 141 MamChandandothers Ippellalll Vcrsll5 Divya RSA Nol755 of 2009 151 Doli IpIoellant Versus Kumar and olhers eslocllldetlt5 161 RSA No756of2009 NathiRam andanother Vcrsus Pardeep Kumar and others 1 79 RSA Nol757 of 2009 Sauni Devi Appellallt Versus 1 PardeepKumar and others iespondent 5 Singh Gagan Preet 2012.11.29 13: 14 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 411 RSAN017580f2009 1 Vt Surta Appelloilts VerSUS Pardeep Komar and tlthers 6191 RSA Noa2759of 2009 Sohanl al and others Appellants Versus Kunlar and Itllers 20J RSA Noe2760of 2009 Kreshni I9eviand otIlcrs lploellailts VersllS Pardeep Kunlar and others Rcspondents 211 RSA Nol761 of2009 Puran lppellonl Versus Pardeep Kumar andothers ResloolltlCllt 6221 RSA Noe2762of2009 Mam Chand and otllers Ippellant Versus PardeepKumar and tltllers Respundcnt5 CORAM HONBLlC MRe JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HONIllIll MR JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH 1 Whetllcr Reporters tIf local papers inay be allowed to see thc judgmcnt7 2 To be rcferred to tllc Reportersor ilot2 berepoltedintheDiges ll Singh Gagan Preet 2012.11.29 13: 14 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 4 412 1resent Mls Rlliawa Randhir Bawa SamuelGill and w ShashiCiuptaAdvocatesfor the in PA Ns330 to 735 of2009 1 Mr AKChopraSr Advocate with Mr HarminderSinghAdvocate for thepetitioncrs inCWP Nos2353 of1991 15051and 18577of 2001 Mls LNVerma and KiranPal SinghAdvocates for the in CWP N010684 of2001 Ms ShubhraSinghDAGIaryanaforthc Statc Mr BhligSinghAdvocate for thc in RSA Nos2747 to 2750 ond2750 to 2762of 2009 HEMANT GUPTA J This order shall disposeof aforementioned22 cases arising011tof suilolusIand case of Om Parkastsince deceasedl Nosl0684 and 150510f0f2001 and CWP No 185772001pertain to the of mulatioil cithcl on account ofpurchtse ofland as tenanls area clr tlIC settingasideofthe said orders The threewrit petitionsnentiOlltId above arc the cascs in which the issuesregarding surplusIatld Om Parkash is to hc cxamined Learncd counsel for the partiesagreethat decision Ill the said three wril joetitions lvould govern the retnaining cases as well and such cases can be disposedof in terins of thc decision Ill the afcrcsaid writ jlctitiolls CWP Nosl0684 of2001 and 15051 of2001 llre lv some of the tenants who are claimingrightto purchaseIand as llle tenants permissiblcarea of big landowner Om Parkasll I Ilc J petltionerstherein have challengedthe orders dated 2909 1997 Singh Gagan Preet 2012.11.29 13: 14 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 6 413 110999 c0 24032000 hy thc SpecialCollector r and the 1inailcitil inmissioner e7 CWP N 18577of2007is filed Ily lhe legalhclrs of dcccased Om Parkash the afrcsaid orders which arc alstI lrlatter ofchallenge in the tIrcsaidtNo wrIt The facls tire that Om Parkash big land owner 14iS Iand in dilfcrcnt villagesnamely Nlandebri Sugh Galoli lOasatlitIiId Ilc subllliltcdIli in FormEin accorde with Rule 3 61ofthe Punjlih Securit of Land Tenures Rulc 1956 0r sh0t1 the Rules I ailtl sent the said form under post Oll 19061958 to the CollectorAinbala ll was plciidedby hiin in earlier writ petititltl ICWP 873 of 1987Jthat I7lrmswere sent ttl the Colleclor IIl he reason that no SpecialCcIlleclorwas appointcd till theexloitytll SiX lllOlltbsAfter thc said sclection the Collectorpassed an ord4r on0907 960 The saidordcr reaclsas under 1 Presentlltnd olvner Ivithcounsel Acctrdingtl1 711111 D the Ialld olvlier tlwned 1Ol SA 7 118unils cIf Iatld I lll 15041953andhc lIwns 120SA 112unltsal presentAddiI area 1 SA 1118tInllsin villageMandchriand 5 SA C12 1111115 111 I lwtlcdbytheland owneron 15 04953 w11i1 11 hasbeen sold lhe totalareawith theland oWl ICl conles to 127SA 1 118units Oul ol this theItlllowillg ilrcil 15 under tenants Iis sIiown in Ihe Form D rclatingIo tlle Iand owner Jagadhri lSA 112 units Mandebri 62SA 19112 units Sugh lSA 50112units Galoli 36SA 20114utlils Dasani 2SA ll114 units 5SA 9a112units 119SA 14 units Singh Gagan Preet 2012.11.29 13: 14 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 414 Inaddition6 unitsof laiItltll e lltlder orchardin l iIIagL MandebriDeductingarea lllltler I lle 1ci12iillsandthe rcharc e4 the area remainedwith thc 1iitIdowner is Iess lhan hi area js tljt11t Iorc ilO C The case be Oled Announced071960 Sdlw CollcctorJagadhri Inthe saidordero110SllrlllllS area was foundwith lhe as afterdeducting thetciltints area andthe oforchardthe landwiththe Itlildowner was foundto lIe Iess area thailthe area Afler tlle 9aldorderwas solne t1l thetenants 61ed 171Illlrchase of IandunderSection I ofthe PunjabSecurityof Land 1 enures Act 1953 for short tllo Act The leamed Assistatll Collector vidc its ordcr datcd of the as the arca sought to Ile 291969 by someof the tenanls was withlnthereservedarea 01 theOrn Parkash In against the said order bv the tenant 1 1 theIearnedCollector reinandetlthc cases to thc Assistant CollecttIr m to examine the questionllltit whether the tenants are Iiable l 0 Iand if tlle reserliIliln Is not made according to Iaiv aid whethersuch Iand belorlgsto he area of thc laild owner Ihe Collectorpasscd an order on 23 12 1969that the lilntl hassent his selcctlon form with the lorm A and C 10 tlle OWOCr Collector in theyear 1t158 but lhe Iandowner has sold Iand In Bintil TehsiI l hanesar District Karnal IlelcIit tl i casewas tcl be decicled by SjoecialCol Iector Jt was iilcuJnbelll uponlandowner to serid his forms to Special Collector undcr Section5A and 5B 01 the Act and under Rules 3 and 40flhe Rulc 1 and the orlns havc bcen senl wronglythcrcfore no actltlll I Singh Gagan Preet 2012.11.29 13: 14 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document C 415 on thtlsef0rms l n the appealagainst thesaid clrdcr lllc 4 leanedComllllSslOnertlll 15A 1970directedthe parties to appcar beforetlleSpccialCollcctorfor reIecision After thesaidorder the Iearned Collector passed 811 ordcr on 121972 J 14standard acres asthc land in the hailds cofhip landowner The against the saidorder was dismissedbi ColnmlssloilelOil 22 I O 1973 13ut the Iearned 1inancilil vide i1vorder daled 18121974 rcturnedtllc ill2ltl41 to the CollecIr after appealof the Iandowncr ThcIearnedFinanciolColnmissionerdirectedthe Special Collector to look into threepoiiltsdelineatedbyhiln in the said order Tllc of Iand iilcasuritlg194 Kanals 14 Marlas situaled Ill VlageBlllal from ItilJdowlnerflled a writ petitionbe1orethis cotiil 6CWP6859 of 19741 This court set aside the order 01 Specitll Collector on SeptenIler 13 1978so as to decide the claiin 0f tlle 1 1 purchaser as well 1leSpecialCollector thereafterreadeternlinccl 3 the surpIuS case 0llle Om Parkash on 06081979 The tlppeill 1 was dsnlissed on 2 1Ol 1981 llle Financial CoIninissionrI dislnissed the rcvisiIn on 22 10 1986 The ordcr joasscdv lllc Financiol Commissitlilcr was before this Courl in CH I No873 clf I 987 bv Im Parkash Tllis Court relnittedtlle nlaller ttl the Fitlallcial Conlillissoner 171rredecision in accordancewitll Itili and in tllc llghtclf tIllservations inadc therein as the clrdel IliisseI by the 1inancial CIlnmissioner was founcl to be witllcllil 11111 reason The Icarned Financlal Comtnissioner accepled tlte rCVlS1011 Oll 161995 Tllc relevant extract from lhe said clrdcr rcads a5 under 1 Singh Gagan Preet 2012.11.29 13: 14 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document f C1 416 5 The pointI ll wlllch 1 find a Iol ilf nleril is tll 4 Illat i1 ls d111 iiig thc purchasc of 111 that the surpltrarea case of the Iand owner 14 to bc openedIhis is a verydoublfulproposnion lil mvmind Even if it lviIs lo be opened it couldnot hae beeil done withoutthcaploIIl11clf thehigherauthorityAdmittedll noapproval has been tIltainedwhilereviewing thesurplus arcii case ofthe landlord wllich hadacquiredOnalityon 97 9611 he writtenargumeiltssubnlittcdby the do Ill Il seem to cltny IllUClltIlilvictlotl I ittll Ilrtnly017heview tllal 1111 these two coullts allltIe lhc revisiotlloelilion shcIlildsuccel Theordersdated6 8 1979 and 20Oll981 oflhe Assisl11 and the Iimisslonerare set asidc tlhecasc lliIck to the SpecialCollector 61r de Iltll t l hv issliiile iloticestt boththe loarttes Thepresentround0f litigation is basedUpon theOrdcr by the Speclal CollccttIr on 2909 1997 after the aforcsaltl orderof the Financlal 4Iillinissioner The IearnedSjoeci tI Collectorheld to the followlngcffecll I am fitlly 111 with the learned councl Ii or landownerThtl1rderdated16091995is very muchclcal Ill 1 orderdated09J7 1960surplus area case of thelandolvllelU I decidedand heldthattotalarea of the IandownerIvas 1274 1 1m118units OItt of thisthclIllowingareas was underteiIont Village Area SA Unils Jagadhri 1 6e314 Mandebri 62 1314 Sugh 1 5112 C7a101i 36 2114 Dasani 7 110114 Farrakhplll 5 90117 119 14 1naddition to 6 units ofland as under orchard in 10i1101c Madabri redllritlgarea utlder the lenants and the orclliIrd tilc arca with tltt Iandowncr remaiils Iess tllan his Ilcrlliissil Ilc area T hereaIler duringpurchaseproceedingsit was dct ectcd that the larldillvller alstl holds Jand in vi llilgeMandi ti1141 1Illlt falling in tltllet district he piositionregarding tllec tlooI viIlagesis as ullder Singh Gagan Preet 2012.11.29 13: 14 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document I l e 417 IO Village Area Reinarks SA Unil 4h Mandi 1 11 Purchasedhytenants undcr ScctionIli ofthc Act SA IJlll Bint 47 15481 llnder old tcnant 30 1411 solcluplo30738 Il 133 1 13anjar 6 3371 47 I9vl 1 ln the Iight theabovediscussionseven if areas i Il other two villages 11 COUlllccIln lhe total holdings01 Ilie landownerthe remalllS the sanlc ie wlth No Surplols Area Thereforeiillcr allolvIng 30 SA of area perhis choice 1htlrenlaining area is declared as te11li1i15 area 1 The ordcr lolisstdby the SIoecialCollector I1 Is afOrmed lll appeal on 121 ll 1199by the IeatnedCoinlnissicllle The learned Cominissioner I7Iundtllat two pointsretnain lcl l3e decided Firstlythe 0f form 1 atld wIhat15 the effect of death01 landt1wnerll lound that the inerits 01 Ille case are not affected by not rcparingFornl 17 and that no sull 1 plea has been ralsed 1111 1chalf 0f the Iandowtler thal 111e calculalions made are incIrrccl Ill 2111Y mannera ln respecl 01fIile 1 ofdeath oftllc 12lndowner on 1971992 the Ielirtlcd Colnmissioner found that tlle heirs ofthe Iandownerfrom 19921111 1997had not moved anv ication before the SpecialColIcclot nor took any othcr to ohtain the beneflt of ofthe case ofsurplusTlIerelore the Iegalheirs of the IandtlllIlCr had no right to make sucll clilllll lll an appealfor thc flrst 1111C Ill respectof plea of the tellunls in 1he appealthat the order dnled 09071960 is a nullit Il Irlllrld that the 14ighCourt and tlle Financial Commlssionerhave held this order to be valid and lhal the rlghtsofthe tenants ate not affected as the tenants loerinisslllle Singh Gagan Preet 2012.11.29 13: 14 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 011 Ile 1 418 areil WIlild remalll rhe l inllncialCmllllSSiOOCrhas thc revisionin linline 011232000 The helrsof lhc 1iildownerin their wril pelltloll No18577of 2001 have sought9ttlllg aside 0 1 lhc orders dated 12101999and It is pleadcd casc of the leeal eirsof the landowicr lllat thc ordcr dated0907 96 and could illIl Ioe special Iy in the hasattained Ilv the tenants The rclevant 13of thc IiIrit readas undco averments 111 aI Because the tlrdcr dated JulII 9 196ll Antlexure I attaineclthe could nol bc rcoened espcciul ll inthe initialedbythctenants bl Bccause altllotivh No ara Nl of Ili order Annexure ll4 1111s foutld and held that thc ordcrdalt Julv9 1960hadalltitnedOnolityand thcsaiddccisioncailnlII be ai11110 changccould be tnadehy the 9pecIeIl HarVaIlil Ill lhc satlle yct he ened in distnissiilg tl appeal flledbytllc cl Because tlle lrder Annexure Pll havingnoIt hetIl by iiIytIneitlcltldiilgthe tetlants alld theSttttc111c are t4l IvorkouttlIclrriglll vvithilllhe ittlllllt cll tlit saidorderandtiiltler 1111 rIf Iiiu theSilinc CtlultlIlei opene During the curse of argumenlsthe parties 1eVClCl111 iden spectofselectitlfl madebythe landownerin forin 1 1111 19061958ie afterthc itlsetllon of Section 5A 5B and SC in tlle Actvidc Punjab Act Ntl6 0f 1957 The said fact is adinitcd in thewritten statement fllcd on bchalf of SpecialCollector I Itniryalla lrl the present set 01 writ petitionsand noticed in thc order datetl 2312 1969passedby llle Collector attached in earlier wril pclititln filed bv lancowner It is also recorded in the ordcr datcd Singh Gagan Preet 2012.11.29 13: 14 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document I2 419 301987 loythe I liloisitln Bench of this Court in llle Siiitl P Wrlt as well asIn lllctIrderpassed bythe SpecialCollccltlr 1 on 29091897 Mr Seniclr Advocate appearillg 111 belIalf of the legalheirs of thc Iandowner arguedthat Iile for the declartllion of surpluslaild of the landtllvner shall bc deemedto be on the date of coinmellcemeill clf Thc Harvana Ceiling 01 1 tild l loldlngsAct l 972 for sllorl llle 1 Act therelorcIheSulplllS area case of Om Parkashhus to bedecided in terms cIl Section33210iilofthe I4aryana Act reid 1 withSection 1046b101tlic Act 11is arguedthat the orderpasscd bythe Sloecial Collcctir is nclt sustalnableas the stiiplus arca tlf tlle land ownedby Om Parklishis required lol be rletcrminctl allcr A his death on 19719 2 as on the said date the land WtlS Iltlt utilized lt is argucdllllit the Iand can lle said to bc uti1i7cdoillIr when possession is handedover to the tenants aftcr allotment 11 J land and on Ifother forinalities The ordei lfallutintInll 1 itself docs not amouul to the of the process 111 utilizalion Reliance IS placedupon the 1Ionble SuprelllCClIlirl judgmentrcportedllS Financial Commissioner Hurvanu others Vse Smt Keltt Devi and another AIR l 980 SC 30 Krishnn Kumuri and another VseStale ofHarvana and Itnother 1999 1 SCC 338 2111dupon VL111Bench judgmentof llis Cclurl Ill Smt Aiit Kaur and others Vs The Puniub State and other I98U PLJ354 Il is alstI arguedlhat the cIrderpassedby lhc Flnanciitl 1 Commsioner on I lI19 995 remancling the casc to tlle Spcciiil Singh Gagan Preet 2012.11.29 13: 14 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 1 420 for de novcl dcIcininatlonis deelned lol 1c determinationof surplus cse of thc IandownerOm Parkash 1hus L part of Ianclwould bc tivailablefor by the tcnants as 110 tlle Iand area is It hedctcrmincdin the handsof Iegalhcit ofOm Parkash and not iis in the handsofOm Parkash Reliallce 1 placedupon Antu Vv Naresh Suran 2001 RCR 4Civio 79000PblAnoop Singhund others Vs The StateofHurvunIi andothers 2008 RC71 Civill 626 DBPbl and SardarnSineh andothers Vs The t7nuncial Commissionerand others 2008 RCR Civi1174iFullIlenclbl It is argued that thc order dated09071960 has becil passed by tlle CollecltIr tlloughthe surpluscasc of the Iandofvnet was to be dccidcd by Colleclor in terms 01 Rulc 4B ofthe Rulcs as tlIt Iaildofdeceasedbiglanclownerwas siluatctl Ill morc than one dlstrict and that for dcclaration tll surloluslaild ofOin 1arkushshall be deemedto be pending alsu lr the reason that form 17 has not been Relianccis placcd uponGurdial Sinh iiedl bv his LRs Vs State ofHarFona1993 lI RRR 541SBPlll andAnoopSinh und others Vs Tlle Stlitr ofHarrana ond otlIers2008 2I RCR Civill 626 DB b Mr LlVNerina Advocate Oll behalf 01 the lellanl5 arguedlhat Ordcr tltled 971 960 Citllnotobc sald t be void Ilr without jtlrisdictitlllIlillyfor tle reason lhat the same las passcd by Col lcctor and 11111by SpecialCol Iector and that surplus IatId case callllOl be reollctledfor the said reason thoughthe selcctiotl tll the landowner should have been nlade knolvn to the pattieslt is also thta case of tIlc lenants tbat selcction of a pennissiblca rra Singh Gagan Preet 2012.11.29 13: 14 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 15 421 bylhe landllwilcr callnot be eitherbyIlle aCI made of parties or by uf law exceptwilh the written conscnt 01 64 be thetenants affectedby llie chan Learnedcounsclalso relied upon a Division Beilcll of this Couil as Lal and others Vse StateofHaoIanaand others 2001 ll PLJ 148 and KamlaDeviand othersVs StateofHarvanaand others2010 21SLJ OHI 811 Ilis thattheland vests with Stalc oll thecomlllencement0 I1aryana Act thercforethesurplus Iatldalcl casecannol be After havillg heard learncd counsel for lhe particstll SOme lengthwe Ilild that thc following questiOllSarisc lr consideration il Wlletherthc orderdated 09071960 passcdb tllc Collectorin respectof surplus area If Oill PIrkashis Ilnal and iil Whetherthe land was unJtilized 01119J71992 1C thedatcof deathof Onl Parkash thcrclorc lllc surplusland area was to bc rC detcrminedin terms of Section 33 I tllr I Iilrvana Act read with Section 10A 01 lllc Atl iiil Wllether the tenants 11r011 dclerminedin order dated 971960 vests lvilh tellalltsand stand utilized on the said dale i1scIf7 0 ccJilsiderlhe respectiieargunlentstll lllc IearilietI COUllSel179rthe piirlies the relevailt Of lIlC 111jiill Securitv of Iand 7 enures Acl 1953 and Rules framed thernder and the provisionsotlle HaryanaCciling of Land IloldingsAcl 1972t7ecd10 be cxlcted Such provisioilsrcad as utldcrl The Punjab SecurityofLand Tenures Act 1953 Singh Gagan Preet 2012.11.29 13: 14 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document r5 422 vAe Ileclitration 14 Aflldavits 0 Br l Furnislirillly Certain Landowners And Tenants lerl J iIr tenant Ivhoowns or holds land in excess of P area aIld1here Iaildis situatediil illclre 11111 1atwar circle shall fiirnish Ivilhina periodof slx nloiltllsIhllll 57 llle COtllillcncemenlrlf the PunjabSecurityol 1aild l ellUrC 1AtnendlllciltlAct 1957 a declaratiotl b llil ffldavil itj respecttIf the landowrnedor hcld lly Ililll n SLitIl 81111 llllillller aildto suchauthorit as nlaybc 5I3 Seleetion of Pcrinissible Area and of Failure11ISelectl1l I A landolvnerwho has nol excrclscdhi5 rightof rCScrvatiOll underthis Act mav selecthis area aiid intitnEitethe selectionto the alithotitI withintllc Ilcriodspecifled in Section A andln stichfc11lll manner iis mav be 1ttnlidedthtIl i laildtIinvtlcr wllo is required ttl Itirilisll declaratlllilunder Section 5A shall intimatc Ilis scleclltlll alongwillI IlIatdeclaration 121 1f 11 Itlildownerfails to select hls permissihle 111 Ill accIJrdliilceWlth lhc of subesectioill l l Illc authority lnayslibject to thcprotsiolls tll SccliClil C seleettlleparcel or theparcelsof landwhich suclljOcrSOll1 entitledtli retainunderthe provisions ofthis Acll 1rovidedihal lhe prescribed authority shall not inaIe the seltcIioll lvithout givingthe IandownerctlnceriIeclilll ofbeinghcard 5C PeniiltyFor Vailttrc l Furnish Declarltlitln l l l ll J landowtler eilant falls to fumishthedeclaralitlilsullpotIetl by an i111idavit as re4uiredhy Sectlon 5A the prcscrihcl authority uoelow therankof Controllerinay bytlrdct cliiel thal the111110c or parlof the land of such landowilcr11r lCIliIIll in exces5 tll t3n staildardacres to bespeclOed bl such shall Ile Ilt1einedttI he the surpIus area of Sucll IatldcllvllCr Ill tenailt 1111t1 shall be utilized by theStateGol etIlIllCllI Ior l11e purposetiltentioned in SecticItl 104 XXX XXXX 10mAeSurplusArea Vor Resettlement of EjectedTenants tal The Stiite Governnlclll tlr any ofOcer cn113rIwcred h1111 Ill this helIttll shal l be conlpetcnt tll UtiIize any surpIIlSareii 171r the resclllelnent oftenent ejectecor to be cjeclcdtItlder c1t11i9e il ofsull9eclion tl 1ofSectitlil 9 Singh Gagan Preet 2012.11.29 13: 14 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 16 1 423 ccIlitaincdin a olher lliw Ill lll tlIctilneIlcillgIil Rlrcealld s711eitl tlle casc ofland Il ll tlIcStateGcllerlilllentUllderany Ialvfor Ihetimcbetngiil RlrCt orbv an hcir h inheritanceno lransferor otherdisposltioll Il landwhich is comprised in surplus area at tlle conlmencenielll ofthisAcl sllallaffecttheutllizationthereofinclauseIal Such utilizatlonof any surplusareo Itill ntll clTccttllc rIll 111tlle to rccellt 1cnl fi11111 Illl 50settlec he PunjalISecurit ofLand lenures Rules 1956 3e Forln tlce Ilf declarlltion under Section5A of tlIe Aet l1 Thc dct1itratioilsupporled bl an aflldavit requirciI Itl l1t liiIllcr Sccllton l of thcAct shallbc funlishcdll 1 iii ltlrms A alld C aildby a te1101111 ill l111115 13illlll r1 eitherIltr51 1ilallyot by regislered post ll duelto al tlle ollectorofthe distric if his Iandis situatediil 7il1chpatwai circles as are ctlinprised Ittlllil Illle Iislrict tind Illl Illt SjleciltI Clllcctor il his Iandis sitllild itl lltl plltwiir circlesas ttre comprisecl in morc tllalllltle ditrict 44B PreserilIedauthorityunder subsection 21of SectilIll Se13and SeetionSC of the Aet for the purposetll suh SCCtlon 121 ilf Seclitlll 543 llild Section 5C of tlle A the iitiIIltlrity shl111 bc 1iI tlle t Illector if tlle Ianclsownedor hcld bl I lailti owner ur tcint are s1tua1ein patwarcirclescomprised 111Olle district ailtl Iiil IllcSpeclalCollector if lhe Iandsownedor hcld 111 ii landowiltr111tellallt irC Silllateill Ioalwiircircles lSed Itl nlorethan 011e district Assessment of surplus arene with Iandowners and tenants Xxx Xxx XXX 71 6iJ llle C tllector or thc SpecialCollcctor shall PrCPilre a statenlent1il i7IrtnF and forward itnnlediately a ccIpy lhcreol 141 the landtlll 14r Or lelllillt CIIllcerned utldcr ctIvei tll IJl endorsenletll jlrcscribedin tlic 1onll and it sllall bc sericd ulltltl the Iandownet or tcnant as if it were a summons in lhe rniillllCr prescribecl itl 9ectiotl 90 ofthe PtinjabTenant Acl 1887 Singh Gagan Preet 2012.11.29 13: 14 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document I7 424 Illl heSpeclill ollectorsllallilslI l7Irward a ct tll 1tlrlll hyIIilll1c1theCollectorot evcrydistrict iil wllicll 1111 14a area of tlIc landowneror tenant is situaie TheHanlanil 4 eiling of Land lioldingAet 1972 2 Vestingof surplusarea tll The surplu5 arCllOl il slllill 1frointhediiteon which it is dcclarcd is suclI sl011be cleejtcd to have loeeIl acqulredbY the Sliilt GovernmentIor a public purposeJvide Act No 17 01 19761 and all rlghtslitle and interestoincludingthe colititlgelll ifanl b any Iaw custoin or usagc lut tht time beingIll lorCCl of all pCrStlllSin Such areit sholl stililtl ttltlsuchrlglltstitle aild intcrcstshall lcsl ill Ille StaleGovernIncntfreefronl anyenculnbrance 121Tllc riglltand lntercstof thc tenant in llis surjll lIS 21101l wllichis incllidedwitllill thepermissible area ol theIailIolvnl1r shallstand 31 11lc 1r11 declaredsurplus19r lenailt s area underthc lalv and the area declarcdstlrplLis Ilildel Ille Pepsu1a14 which has tlclt so far vested iil Illc Slille hall be dcemed to have vestedin the Stiite Clovernnletit Ivith effect from the appointed dityand the iltt I whichnli110Ilc o declaredunderthePuniiibIalv Ill tlle JClIll 1 Ialvaftcr tllc iippointed dayshall be dcemedtc1h211cvesled111 1 the Statc 1111oernineiltuith efTect lrotn thc date ol such declaraticni1Vide Act No40 of 19761 9a J 33 RepeiIland Savings xxx Xxx 21 il the proceeding fclr the dctenninationof thesurp1u5 111il pending beforethe commencenlenttlf t11i5Acl tinderIhtaln tvisitlnstoi eitherof tlle said enactnlelltSW111L Il shall becotltinuedand disposed off as it thisAcl had not Ilct Il passedailtlllle surplus area so determinedshlill lCSl Ill illld lc utilized Ilv tlle Statc Governtnent in accordancewith 111 llf IhisAct he SclIcIIIc 01 thc Act lilcludingtllc scolIc 111 Sections vA 5213c0 54 inserled by PunjabAct No6 01 14 carne up for considcrtiticIn before the Honble SuprenleCourt in 11 judglnentreportediIS Luipat Rai and others Vse The Stute rd Puniab and others AlR l981 SC 1401 ln the aforesaid casc IlC Singh Gagan Preet 2012.11.29 13: 14 True Scanned Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 155 425 decidcd 0f thc effect 01 illtitnalloll Ill e IS lll t11 Forln E tnade to the ClllccttJr Il