(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. Civil Application No. 9213 of 2009 (In Civil Application No. 8016 of 2009) (In First Appeal No. 3567 of 2008) Rajdeep s/o. Dindayal Agrawal, Age : 35 years, Occupation : Business, R/o. M/s. Sitaram Indraj Agrawal, Ganjgolai, Latur, Taluka & District : Latur, Presently residing at Tirupati Trading Company, 422/2201, Sant Tukaram Nagar, Opposite Sant Tukaram Temple, Pimpri, Pune-18. .. Applicant. versus 1. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Through Divisional / Regional Officer, MIDC, Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. .......................... Ms. R.P. Hardas, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Dande, Advocate, for respondent no.1. Mr. K.G. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. .......................... (2) CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 11TH SEPTEMBER 2009. COURT'S ORDER : 1. By way of present application, the applicant (original claimant) is seeking modification of the order dated 14th August 2009, to the extent that the applicant be permitted to withdraw the amount, as per the said order, on furnishing bank guarantee of a nationalized Bank or Scheduled Bank. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that in similar facts, this court had given an option to the applicants therein, either to furnish bank guarantee of a nationalized bank or a scheduled bank. It is, therefore, prayed that the same choice may also be given to the present applicant. 3. Since we have already permitted the other applicants to furnish bank guarantee, either of a nationalized bank or a scheduled bank, we do not find any impediment in allowing the application. 4. Hence, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B". ( N.D. DESHPANDE ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE bgp/ca9213