-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.286 OF 2007 REVISION APPLICATION NO.286 OF 2007 REVISION APPLICATION NO.286 OF 2007 ............................................................. ............................................................. ............................................................. Office Notes,Office Office Notes,Office Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, memorandum of Coram, memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s appearances,Court’s appearances,Court’s Court’s Court’s Court’s or or or orders or directions orders or directions orders or directions Judge’s Judge’s Judge’s orders orders orders & Registrar’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. ............................................................. ............................................................. Mr.P.V.Samant for the Applicant CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 26,2007. : JUNE 26,2007. : JUNE 26,2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. In view of the decision of the Division Bench in case of Chandu s/o Jagannath Ambekar and another vs. Digambar s/o Kisanrao Kulkarni and others [2004(4) Mh.L.J. page 69], the learned Advocate for the Applicant states that Revision Application is not maintainable. He seeks permission to withdraw the Revision Application with liberty to file appropriate proceeding for challenging the impugned order. Revision Application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. 2. All contentions of the parties on merits are expressly kept open. -2- JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE