IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2010 / 11TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 20685 of 2010(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- JISHA.K.V. AGED 24, W/O. BIJU.V.V. PEON, PANCHAYATH HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, P.O. PAPPINISSERY WEST, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KANNUR.P.O, KANNUR-2. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANNUR.P.O., KANNUR-2. 4. THE MANAGER AND SECRETARY, PAPPINISSERY GRAMA PANCHAYAT, P.O.PAPPINISSERY. 5. THE HEADMISTRESS, PAPPINISSERY PANCHAYATH HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, P.O.PAPPINISSERI WEST. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. DILIP MOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. ------------------------------------- WP (C) No. 20685 of 2010 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T ........................... Honouring the 51 B claim of the petitioner under Chapter XIV A of the Kerala Education Rules, the petitioner was appointed as peon in the Panchayath Higher Secondary School, Pappinissery as per Exhibit P1. The said order was forwarded for approval to the 3rd respondent. The 3rd respondent instead of considering the question of approval for appointment, forwarded the same to the first respondent. Thus, the question of approval of petitioner's appointment is now, pending before the first respondent. On coming to know about the said course of action adopted by the 3rd respondent the petitioner has moved the first respondent through Exhibit P2 appeal dated 12.05.2010. 2 WP (C) No. 20685 of 2010 Considering the fact that the question of approval of appointment of the petitioner as also Exhibit P2 are now pending consideration before the first respondent, this writ petition is disposed of, with a direction to the first respondent to consider Exhibit P2 while taking up the question of approval of appointment of the petitioner and pass orders thereon expeditiously at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This shall be done with notice to the petitioner as also to the 4th respondent. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE. rkc