^h IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ( C.G.) e?;, te Bench CIVIL REVISION N0. f°-> /2006 APPLICANT ^EFENDANT N0.1 ^ ^ s'y ^> '^xw /^(y ^./\^ y •<y Smt. Anuradha @ Anuradha Thakur Aged about 26 years W/o. Thakur Surendra Singh R/o. Dalayband (Near Bhatkhande Sangeet Vishwavidyalaya) Bilaspur Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. S. Venkatraman, aged 35 years 4<AINTIFF S/o. Shri Prabhakar Rao, R/o. Ti'akngar (Near Congress Bhawan) Bilaspur Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) DEFENDANT ^o.: S. Prabhakr Rao, aged 67 years S/o. Late Shri Venkatrab R/o. Tilaknagar (Near Congress Bhawan), Bilaspur Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE L^ XI-HC-78 3:n^T^T^J4) cTSTT 3:n^T^M|cti 'v ^.. A<^/ T HWW\ Sh+lich 3^T r^|q|<rtq, ^Tfl^^(o, [^dl^^< .c-/.^;.tJO'.J0^. ^ 200^ 3<1^1 q^ra? (^qi^^) ^RTT^K^IN^n^T 26.7.2006 Shri Gautani Khetrapjal, Heard onadniission. This is a rcvision fUeld passed by the Second Civil) No.lSO-A/2005 whereby th^ appUcation filed under Ord^r retura offlie plaint for prcsf qiiestions regarding pecuui^xy After argumg for som^ issiie has already been frajjned tfie fag end, leamed co\ wifhdrawal offhis petition. This petition is disini^ chi^?^i<nTi ^i*4<nT ^* te^l' <Ri^i< ^3Tf^T3TI^T al, counsel for the applicant. agam.st the order dated 11.7.2006 Judge, Class-I, BUapsur, m Civil Suit leanied tdal Court has rejected the ;r 7 Riile 10 ofthe C.P.C., pmying for ttntation to proper cozirt in view offhe jurisdiction, s tirae aad ia view of the fact fhat one on fhis point and fhe trial is at insel for ftie petitioaer prays for ssed as withdraw^J Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge P.T.O.