^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 1708 of 2005 Petitioner Plauitiff Versus Respondents 1. Defendaats 2. a) b) c) Ashok Kumar, S/o Aijundas Tuteja, aged 46 years, R/o Dayalband, Bilaspur, TahsU & Dist. Bilaspur (CO) Sint. Krislmaavanti, W/o Sardar Swama Singh Jhutela, aged about 70 yrs, R/o Shiv TaBdes Road, Bilaspur and also R/o 22, Keshav Road laxmaa Chowk, Dhradun Tahsil and District Dehradun (UttaranchaQ Jagdish Makhija fhrough his legal representatives Ji^endra MasKhija, son of Shri Jagdish Makhija. Balram MaJduja, s/o ShriJagdish Makhija. Bah-am Makhija, s/o Shri Jagdish Makhija. Respondents 2(a) to 2(c) residcnts of Dayalbaud, BUaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 'niakur (Writ Petitiou under Ardcle 226/227 ofthe Coiistitution oflndi^ (SB: Honlale Shri Satish K. Agnihotod J.) Shri Sudeep Agarwal, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri Amrito Das, Advocate for the respondents No.2 a to c. O RD B R (orall ( Passed on fhis 3td day ofJuly, 2009) Heard. 1. Leamed coimsel appearmg for fhe petitioaer, on instrucdons, subraits that siace the inatter has atready been decided by the trial Court, this writ petition has becoiae infructuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection. 3. ^_Accordiagty, fhe petition is dteinfased as haviag beconie arfructuous. -—- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge