1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3871/2010 ( The A.P.M.C., through its Secretary -: VERSUS :- Meghraj Pundlikrao Dongre & others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 16 th AUGUST 2010. Heard Adv. Shri Ghate for petitioner. Contentions – the fact that petitioner - A.P.M.C. is not a public authority could not be pressed into service before State Commission as matter came to be decided on returnable date itself. I have perused the impugned order. By impugned order State Commission has directed Public Information Officer and Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies to procure information from petitioner and to supply it to applicants. The State Commission, therefore, has not treated petitioner as public authority and has not issued any directions to it to supply the information. The contention of Adv. Shri Ghate is misconceived at least in present facts. Perusal of section 2 (f) of the Act clearly shows that an information relating to any private body which could be assessed by public authority under any other law for the time being in force also can be directed to be supplied. In this 2 situation, it is apparent that at least in present matter no case is made out warranting any interference. Writ petition is therefore, dismissed. No costs. JUDGE Tambaskar.