(1) CRI. REVN. APLN. 250.2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 250 OF 2008 Durga w/o Pawan Bairaji, Age : 20 years, Occu.: Edcuation, R/o. Near Sahara Hospital, Abhishek Apartment, Vijaynagar, Garkheda, Aurnagabad APPLICANT VERSUS Pawan S/o Pushkardas Bairagi, Age : 24 years, Occu.: Business, R/o. New Vishal Nagar, Plot No.5, Gajanan Maharaj Mandir, Garkheda Parisar, Aurangabad RESPONDENT ..... None present the Applicant. Mr. B.A. Darak, Advocate for the respondent. ..... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 6TH DECEMBER, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. No steps are taken to secure presence of the applicant. Notice has been returned unserved. The learned Advocate for the applicant is absent. 2. It appears that the Revision petitioner is no more interested in pursuing the Revision Petition. 3. The Revision petitioner has filed Criminal Application bearing Cri. M.A. no. 1269 of 2008 under (2) CRI. REVN. APLN. 250.2008 section 12(1), 19(8)(2) and 20(3) of the Protection of Womens from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The Application was dismissed by the learned Judicial Magistrate (F.C.), Aurangabad. 4. I have gone through the impugned judgment. It appears that the petitioner had married the respondent after they had fallen in love with each other. Their marriage was performed on 2.6.2005. The learned Magistrate noticed that the petitioner duly proved that she was in domestic relationship with the respondent no.1. However, the petitioner failed to establish that the amount of Rs.2,00,000/- was given by her father to the respondent in order to secure a job. It has come on record that the father of the petitioner was not of sound financial position and had opposed the love marriage. No relevant evidence was adduced to prove the presentation of Streedhan. It appears further that the petitioner was under medical treatment at Shanti Nursing Home due to mental disorder. It has come on order that she was rather medically disturbed and used to frequently indulge in quarrels with the husband. She was found (3) CRI. REVN. APLN. 250.2008 to be a woman of erratic behaviour. Documentary evidence (exhibit 22 and 23) lay corroboration to such application of the husband. It also appears that she used to be more aggressive. The learned Magistrate has duly appreciated the evidence of the spouses and the relevant record. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that subsequently divorce decree also was granted on 28.5.2010 on the ground of mental illness and cruelty on the part of the petitioner to the respondent. 6. Considering the reasons ascribed by the learned Magistrate, it is difficult to say that the petitioner was subjected to domestic violence during the relevant period of her residence with the husband and further notwithstanding the fact that he has sufficient means, the respondent neglected to maintain her. Therefore, the dismissal of the Application cannot be faulted with. The Revision Application is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- [V. R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp