IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10496 of 2007 Between: Sadaram Varalakshmi W/o. Visweswara Rao R/o. H.No. 58-1-23, Ramunaidu Colony, Marripalem Main Road, Visakhapatnam City and District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Manager Air Port Authority of India Marripalem, Visakhapatnam District. 2 The Commissioner, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in threatening to demolish a portion of the petitioner the action of the respondents in threatening to demolish a portion of the petitioner building property bearing municipal assessment No.71745 situated in about 413 Square Yards of site at Marripalem of Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation Limits without any notice as illegal, irregular, violative of the provisions of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act,1955 which is made applicable to 2nd respondent and offends articles 14,21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to demolish any portion of said building Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.N.RANGA REDDY (SC FOR MPL. CORP. VSP) The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition has been filed by Sadaram Varalakshmi assailing the action of the respondents-Corporation in threatening to demolish a portion of her house bearing municipal assessment No.71745 situated in and about 413 Square Yards of site at Marripalem of Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation Limits without following the due process of law. 2. When the writ petition came up for admission, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents-Corporation, on instructions, submits that the respondents-Corporation will follow the due process of law in the event of the constructions made by the petitioner are required to be demolished. 3. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage directing the respondents-Corporation to follow the due process of law in the event of the constructions made by the petitioner are required to be demolished. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:01st July, 2008. cs ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{NR}