c^v- :JEN THK HXGH CQVBX fS CESia3*EISGAKH SVmc&'CSS^^^S B3:LaSgi!& EE33:Tia®B;, •X BESEOimEI.ITS ^^^•-' .y^i^Q^' ..^5y' t^'" . ^" ^ •-^. W.P. HO. \[Lf] /2QQ3 fopal Prasad Gahwai, S/» 'Shri Sabascaa Galswal, aged abs-at 74 Years, Retlred Priacipal, K/s Vidl'g'a-upRagar. Bilaspttr (C.G. } Versus s- 1. / Stst.e af M.P. . "hreiigh The Lsalstry af Educatiea, Thr®ughIts Seeretaiy. vallabh Bhawan, Bli®pal ^M.P.) Kcw, Sfeste ®fChba'ttisgarb, Threugh lal.aig-tE^ ®fBduca'eien. Threugh its Secretary, Haatralsg' D.K.BhawaB aai.p^-r { C.G. ) 2<i/ Qirecter •£Pnblic Eiaiicatieia M.P. Bhapal Direcfr »f Publio Bducafeieia ehlisttisgaEh, Raipur ( C.G. ) 3. Birectsr Peasi®n,tigB. Bta®pal tt Hsw Direcfeer PensiaB., Chhat^tisgarh Baipur ( C.G. ) SSX1TICS T3SEBS. BfiSlESE' 226^27 ff-,_Sffi eCMSTI'EU'CIQK 05- JSES&. 1. 2. Eaitiiealars af the .peti-bieia&c &s iBeati&aed ia fehe cause t:i-tle» ParticulaES T:;tfas re.speiades!t As roeB-fcieaed is the cause fltl:e. -!- XI-HC-22 9':5?-"!1Wfy*l, ®'^'y<l<fc^°ICT'M'P. sa^fgii R'ti'* yi^? ^^icb ^f^ td. ant?!' 1ira^ .:(*>^;i IWCTI a)ii<* -!!^ 2003 fes^' OT^T ^tfPtR^^ bivision Bench:- Hon'bieShri K.H. Hon'ble Shri L.C. . c.; J. Shri Atyl Panetey, counsel fo Shri Senjay K.Agrawal, t)epi|ityAdvocate6eneralfortheState / respondents. Heard both the counse!. fy this petition filed un 28^h April, 1998 passed by^adhy Jabalpur passed in Original Appl learned Tribunal after interpretin] Pradesh Civi! Services (Pension)Ru| that the petitipner is not entitl^ services from 01.Q7.195Q to 30 petitioner himself efter resigning <ftt<<i<'i<il^ ^ift^ "^ '^sl'-tf^K^T ^siPattsii^t . and the petitioner. ler Article 226 d 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitionjer has challenged the order dated a Pradesh Administrativ®Tribunol, ication No.1508/89 by which the j Rule 26, 27 & 28 of the Madhya ss; 1976, reached to the conclusion j for any benefitlofcounting his 11.1987 pn the ground that the from the fiovemment service on .08,1966 joined thsPrivateIns|titytion,on, 05^)8.1966 and worked XI-HC-22 ^. iM'<ti<tltel'<l,^)waio^:&«aw^t-. 311^1 •*1 R-IWl 3(SR1 ^f*^^ +l%fl ^i^?r 'qg^ J^S^W, im?iT^W3F"" ~ '^ 'B^. 20€S 'IS|-b<ff' '""~ 3!^S ^^i^ sy%a -2-- fnere till 30.11.1987. However over by the Sbvernment on 05.Q from his servjceon04.08.1986 a||id thereaftep;he wasnot atall in the Sovernment service. In the abbve circumstar counted his service for fixatior 30.11.1987 as that Privcrte Ir Government and retndined as ©c^ernmentInstitution for this period and the services of the petitibns ^0.11.1987;for the purpose of fi| occurred on account of his 05.02.1967. As per Rule 27,11 the AiP. Civil Seryices (Pensjon) | <l>14tfi^)-t *(1*WT4 fetSl^^R '^aifqti^^i that Private Institution was taken 2.1967. The petitjoner had resigned ces, the respondents have ri of his pension from 05.02.1967 to stitution was tatenover by the waa not counted from 01.07.1950 to ation of his pension. ds there was an interruption in his service 6n 4:count of forfeiture of his service resignation w.e.f. 04.08.1966 to te interruption in the service of a Government servant entaiis forf^iture of his past service. Hence,due to tiie interruption in the servjc^ pf the,petitionei",hispastservice was forfeited autoHiatically as p^r the provisions bf Rule 26 A 27 of |u!es, 1976 as durjng ths4?eriod from XI-HC-22, '3;^"*ljttM<1, »'itl«'»,"&wwi3<, w- SD^rqB ft-<i«b 3B^I sb*^> V^ Sonn ^^i N; SIl^TJi^. Wtt 9hW«h .1^--^ 2UIS •"--•"—-""""••"^^~""""""""""'""""~"""""""~" o-ii^i ^^<ii'y< -yT^fl - s 05.08.1966 to 05.02.1967. the ||> service. Therefore, ,that inter^uption was not condoned by 1+ie Sovernment becouse as per Rule 2J went to the Private Instituti4n with the per'rnission qf the 6overnment. In view of the above, we do |iot find any infirmity or iiiega!ity in the impugned order. The learne<| appliccttion of thejpetitioner. V( petition. Therefore, the petition] Consequent!y.I.A.No.3t8-4/2|303standsyisposedof. Sd/- ChiefJustice *l<it<'l<il"i Ml'teff 9%<Sifat(i< ^ SI^tf sh^T etitioner wasnot'in &ovemment the petitioner has not resigned or Tribunal hds rightly rejected the fe do not find any force in this is' liable to be rejected cnd it is Sd/- LC.Bhadoo .~ Judge |'!(S^^st^ it'!l;It!"'!"'T!"lin""'"lr—T