IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19817 of 2011 01. Sant Lal Mahto, son of Jhhagru Mahto, resident of village-Ganipur, Bhanpur, P.S.-Baligaon, District- Vaishali 02. Anil Ram, S/o Harihar Ram, resident of village- Chakjado, P.S.-Baligaon, District-Vaishali ….. Petitioners Versus 01. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Food & Civil Supply, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 02. The Principal Secretary, Department of Food & Civil Supply, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 03. The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur 04. The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur 05. The sub-Divisional Officer, Mahua, District- Vaishali 06. The District Supply Officer, Vaishali 07. The Block Supplies Officer, Patepur, District-Vaishali ….. Respondents ------------------------------- 02. 17.11.2011 Even though the Court finds that there is cause of action in the present writ petition, but however, in view of the fact that the same cause of action is brought to the notice of the District Administrators through the process of general meeting with the villagers, we are of the opinion that the petitioner can follow the same. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. P.K. (T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Vikash Jain,J .)