IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 23571 of 2008 Between: Vadde Balaiah S/o. Vadde Ramaiah R/o. Kotwalguda Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Tahsildar, Shamsahabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad. 3 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ dircting the respondents to act in accordance with law to forbear from consuming of the petitioner's land admeasuring Ac.1.32 guntas in Sy.No.66/AA of Kotwalguda Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without following the procedure under law and without enabling the petitioner to contest such proceedings which have got the eﬀect of invalidating the title or possession of the petitioner over the land, and grant such other relief Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.VENKATARAMANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO. 23571 of 2008 ORDER: 1 Questioning the action of the respondents in taking possession of the land admeasuring Ac.1.32 guntas in Sy.No.66/AA of Kotwalguda village, shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, for providing house sites under Indiramma Padhakam, without following due process of law, petitioner filed this Writ Petition. 2 When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after ﬁling of the Writ Petition the learned Government Pleader has produced the copy of the Proceedings No.B/949/2005 dated 06.07.2007 passed by the Mandal Revenue Oﬃcer, Shamshabad Mandal and in view thereof, the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to challenge the said proceedings. 3 Permission granted. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings issued by the ﬁrst respondent. No order as to costs. ------------------------- N.V.RAMANA, J. 03.11.2008 kvsn