IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 29TH AUGUST 2011 / 7TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23350 of 2011(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- DEEPAK V.DEV, S/O.DEVADAS, VALIYAPARAKKAL, P.O.PARANATUKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680551. BY ADV. SRI.SHEJI P.ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM-673635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM-673635. 3. DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, TRIVANDRUM-695001. 4. PRINCIPAL, COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, TRIVANDRUM-695001. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC FOR UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.23350/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE MARK LIST OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P1(a): TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE MARKLIST OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P1(b): TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF the MARKLIST OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P1(c): TRUE PHOTOCOPY O THE MARKLIST OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P1(d): TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE MARKLIST OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE SCORE CARD OF THE PETITIONER IN THE GATE EXAM 2011. EXT.P3: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ADMISSION MEMO ISSUED FROM THE 4TH RESPONDENT COLLEGE. EXT.P4: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER FROM THE COLLEGE. EXT.P4(a): TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER FROM THE COLLEGE. EXT.P5: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P5(a): TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REVALUATION FEE RECEIPT. EXT.P5(b): TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE FEE RECEIPT FOR PHOTOCOPY OF THE ANSWER PAPER. EXT.P5(c): TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROFORMA APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION OF THE PETITIONER. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 23350 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 29th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the final B.Tech examination was declared, he had failed in one paper viz., Electrical System Design and Estimation. He applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp