IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.26923 of 2010 DHANU YADAV, Son of Ramsharna Gope Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 07.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that 5-6 unknown persons looted Rs. 50,000/-, Nokia Mobile and Jacket from the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a resident of village Chauki Hudari whereas the informant is a resident of village and Diawan, which is the boarder village. He further submits that many witnesses stated that petitioner frequently visited village Diawan. He further submits that in these circumstances, the petitioner ought to have been named as an accused in the First Information Report by the informant himself. Learned counsel submits that his name figured in the confessional statement of co-accused. The petitioner is in custody since 08.05.2010 and does not have criminal antecedent. In the circumstances, petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Hilsa (Karai Parsurai) P.S. case no. 2 24 of 2010, with the condition that the petitioner would report to nearby police station once every two months and will file an affidavit to this effect in the court below. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)