IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 20623 of 2010 Date of Decision: 25.11.2010 Desh Raj Mangal .... Petitioner Versus State Bank of India and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states vide order dated 22.5.2005, petitioner was removed from services on the ground that petitioner was caught red handed by the Police Authorities while accepting graft from Sh. Narinder Kumar. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that in the criminal trial, petitioner has been acquitted, hence, the sole ground for removal from service also goes. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that although petitioner has moved representation before the respondent No. 4 (Annexure P-11) to this petition on 7.12.2007, however, no decision has been taken thereon. Learned counsel further states that if respondent No. 4 is directed to take decision by speaking order on representation (Annexure P-11), petitioner would be satisfied. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, it is directed that respondent No. 4 shall C.W.P. No. 20623 of 2010 2 dispose of the representation (Annexure P-11) dated 7.12.2007 by speaking order in accordance with law within 6 months from the date certified copy of this order is placed before respondent No. 4. Petition stands disposed of. (ALOK SINGH) 25.11.2010 JUDGE reena