IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8509 of 2010 NITU DEVI W/O SRI VINOD KUMAR R/O VILL KURA NAWADA BANGIAPAR, P.O.PUNPUN, P.S.PARSA BAZAR, DISTT-PATNA ………..PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER PATNA 4. THE SUB. DIVISIONAL OFFICER PATNA 5. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER null MASAURHI 6. THE C.D.P.O. PUNPUN, DISTT-PATNA 7. THE MUKHIYA , GRAM PANCHAYAT KANDAP TARANPUR, P.O.PUNPUN, P.S.PARSA BAZAR, DISTT-PATNA 8. RINA KUMARI W/O RAM PRASAD KUMAR R/O VILL- KURA NAWADA, P.O. PUNPUN, P.S., P.S.PARSA BAZAR, DISTT-PATNA ………. RESPONDENTS ----------- 2. 08/04/2011 It appears from the records that after order was passed in the writ application of the respondent remitting back the matter, vide Annexure-10, parties were heard and impugned order was passed by the Collector, vide Annexure-11, holding that the respondent had higher marks than the petitioner in the merit list duly signed by the Panchayat Secretary and the Mukhiya and therefore, earlier order of disengagement of the respondent was bad. In the Guidelines, petitioner has remedy of appeal before the Divisional Commissioner against the said order of the Collector which she can avail. In the circumstances, this writ 2 application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal against the said order of the Collector dated 22.10.2009, as contained in Annexure-11. If such an appeal is filed by the petitioner within four weeks from today, the same shall be considered by the Divisional Commissioner on merits, parties shall be heard and orders shall be passed within a period of two months from the date of filing of such appeal. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)