3(1^1 WfiplNR" TOT^n^TsCTN? & "3"^ "^Fn^ra, ^T?l<i<ito, i®Kni^y <nN<niwii<i> ^ "W( 200 3n^?T ^Rrar (^ia^^r) ^«ii<tRt<fta (Singi& Bench; Hon'ble Mr. W P. (O No.6919 /G9 (Petition under Articie 226 pctitioner . M/^ -Vsna^c Bllospur, Proprietor Sushi! Kurr4i Old Sarkan rf the Constitution of India) ak Constructions, Old Sarkanda ijlaspur (C.S.5 through its Sole |5mt. Bhawana Agra^ai, W/o Shri ^raw'cs!, a9ed ab^ut 40 yecsrs, R/o . ja, Bilaspur (C&) Vs Respondents 1. State o| Urban Departnl 2. Munjdp4 Throug^ 3. The Bilaspur 4. Coiiectot Q9.12.2009 AAr. Harsh Wardhctn, Advocatb Mr. 5. Thakur, Panel La^yer AArs. Hamida Slddique, Advoc^te Head on I.A. No.2, appiicati^n ^ith liberty to flle Civii Suit. Not opposed. Accordinqly, I.A. No.l is aibv ^"jthdrawn mYh liberty as prayed for ^OTfeP^'RFRff ^f 1^zt <F»it^i< ^3iRTH3TT^S?T ustice Dhjrendra Mishra) Chhatti^orh, through Secretary, idrTiinistratiors and &eveiopment ^ent, D.K.S. Bhawan. Raipur (C©) Corporation, BjJGSpur (C,©»), its Commlssioner. CotrimissiGner, Municipol Corporation, •|(c.a) ', t)lstrict Biluspur (C.@.) •^ for the petitioner. |or re^pondent No.l & 4. ^te for respondent No.2 & 3. for withdrawai of writ petition 'ed and the petition Is dismi^sed as Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge ?T- ^TO^T^k ^li^ <M'IKItM—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.