1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1684 OF 2007 Lata Vijay Paware ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. ... Respondents. With Writ Petition No.1687 Of 2007 Shewanti Chaudhari Rehase ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. ... Respondents. With Writ Petition No.1691 Of 2007 Guli Tumdya Walvi ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. ... Respondents. 2 With Writ Petition No.1692 Of 2007 Indira Ganpat Padvi ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. ... Respondents. ----- Shri. Shrimant Munde, Advocate, holding for Shri. S.P. Brahme, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri.V.B. Ghatge, Shri. S.K. Tambe and Shri. N.B. Patil, Assistant Government Pleaders, for respondent No.1 – State of Maharashtra. Shri. C.R. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.4 in Writ Petition No.1684 of 2007. ------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE: 17th JUNE 2009 PER COURT: 1) Heard. 2) The proper remedy for the petitioners would be to approach the Divisional Commissioner 3 under the provisions of Section 267-A of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act 1961. 3) In case the petitioners approach the concerned Divisional Commissioner, while considering the question of limitation, the fact of pendency of these petitions in this Court shall be taken into consideration by the Commissioner. 4) The writ petitions are disposed of. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.1684.07