IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P. 3563 of 2009 Decided on 15.3.2010 Anuj Kumar ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For Respondents: Mr.R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: (i) That the respondents (especially respondent No.4) may be directed to release the Grant in Aid to the petitioner as per the Grant in Aid rules with interest. Petitioner may approach third respondent in which case the matter can be looked into, particularly in view of the submissions made by the learned Dy Advocate General that the petitioner did not possess the requisite qualification for appointment and that the engagement by the PTA was only a private arrangement and in such circumstances, State is not bound to release the grant in aid. In the event of petitioner filing such representation within a period of two weeks from today, the matter will be duly considered by the third respondent. In case the petitioner requests for hearing, the same shall be granted. The needful as above shall be done within a period of three months from the date of production of the copy of the judgment alongwith the copy of the writ petition. Petition stands disposed of. ( Justice Kurian Joseph ), Chief Justice March 15, 2010(sl/p) ( Justice R.B. Misra ), Judge