1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 47. CA/4726/2007 In CRAST/7000/2007 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. A.B.Kale, AGP for the applicant. Mr. D.V.Tele, AGP for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:12-3-2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard. Perused the record. The delay of 36 days caused in filing the civil revision application is sought to be condoned. Though Counsel for the respondent has objected, however, I find, the delay is certainly not deliberate. A pragmatic and rational approach needs to be taken as counting of every days delay does not mean that it should be counted in the same fashion. Application (No.4726/2007) is allowed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/4726-07ca