XI-HC‘22 MW 10.9.2004 Shri P‘P‘ Sahu, counsel for the petmoner \ Shri N‘K. Agrawal, Dy. Advoc ate General for the State The petitianer has preferred Lhls wnt/petltlon under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner has challenged in this petition , ' that respondent No.2 is not supply‘ng him enrolment form for the purpose of applying for registration as Ayu rvedic Practitioner. The petitioner had acqmred qualification in Vaidya Vsharad from Hindi Sahitya Sammelan Pravag, Allahabad which was recognized under Adhiniyam 1970, but by notification—dated 4 ll 89 Said rec tion was withdrawn w e f 4 ll 89 L The claim of the petitioner 's that he obtained the degree before O44 1 1‘ 198C , smoe then he 1e prach ng, therefore, when he started practice, the degree was recognized. The fur her claim 'of the petitioner is that in the light‘of the order of MP. High Co rt passed in Writ Petition No. 287/90 between Shekhar Jain‘Vs. State o Madhya Pradesh & others (Anhexure P~1), the respondent ought to have upplied the form and consider the case of the petitioner Havmg heard the learned co nsel for the parties and havmg regard to the facts and Circumstances oft e case, respondent No 2 is dlrected to supply the form to the pet1tioner thereafter dee1de the caee of the petitioner about the eligibilitv of t e registration in the light of the order passed bv M P High Court in W P No 287/90 between Shekhar Jain V3 State: 0f Madhya Pradcsh 8a others With aforesaidldirection, the etition stands disposed oft Consequently, M.W‘P. No.2 04/04 85 LA, No.5588/04 also. stand disposed of. Sit/- L.C,BHADOO Judge [HieW Certified copy as per Rules. o i d