THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO TAKEN UP WRIT PETITION No.22931 of 2009 Date: 11.11.2009 Between : Naseem Begum … Petitioner and The Inspector of Police, Task Force, Hyderabad and others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO TAKEN UP WRIT PETITION No. 22931 of 2009 ORAL ORDER : (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R.Varma) Heard learned Assistant Government Pleader, representing the learned Advocate General, appearing for the respondents. 2. This Writ of Habeas Corpus is initiated at the instance of the petitioner’s telegram, dated 12.10.2009, wherein it is alleged that the son of the petitioner viz., Master Mohd. Faraz Khan was illegally detained by the Task Force Police on 11.10.2009, that she is apprehending danger to his life and set him at liberty. 3. A counter affidavit has been filed by the first respondent- Inspector of Police, West Zone Task Force, Hyderabad, stating inter alia that on receipt of credible information with regard to the chain snatchers and on suspicion about the involvement of the alleged detenu in such offences, the alleged detenu was called to the Task Force Office, West Zone, Hyderabad, on 12.10.2009 for enquiry and during the enquiry, since his involvement was not established as on the said date, he was let off on the same day on execution of personal bond in the presence of two mediators i.e., Mohd. Gulam Hamed and Mohd. Ismail. 4. It is further stated in the counter affidavit that the petitioner also approached the Andhra Pradesh State Human Rights Commission, Hyderabad, in H.R. Case No.7096 of 2009 on 13.10.2009, wherein she filed a petition stating that her son, who is the alleged detenu, was released and basing on the said petition, the case was disposed of by the State Human Rights Commission on 15.10.2009. 5. In view of the facts stated by the first respondent in the counter affidavit, we feel it inexpedient to continue the writ petition any further and the same is liable to be dismissed. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA _________________________ JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO 11.11.2009 Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO TAKEN UP WRIT PETITION No.22931 of 2009 11.11.2009 (Msr)