IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER THURSDAY, THE 19TH JUNE 2008 / 29TH JYAISHTA 1930 WA.No. 1081 of 2008 ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.28861/2007 Dated 14/01/2008 .................... APPELLANT / 3rd PARTY --------------------------------- VYAPARI VYAVASAYI EKOPANA SAMITHI VYAPARA BHAVAN, PANACHAMOODU, NEYYATTINKARA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.B.SATHIQ SMT.N.K.MAYA RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS & PETITIONER ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT LOCAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY VELLARADA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, VELLARADA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE PRESIDENT VELLARADA AGRAMA PANCHAYATH, VELLARADA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. AUTO RICKSHAW DRIVERS UNION (I.N.T.U.C) PANACHIMOODU, VELLARADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. BINO GEORGE, S/O.M.T.GEORGE MURIKANNANIKAL, AMBOORI, VELLARADA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN SRI.SERJI JOSEPH THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & A.K.BASHEER, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A.No.1081 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 19th day of June 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.DATTU, C.J. Aggrieved by the orders passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition No.28861 of 2007 dated 14.1.2008, petitioners in the writ petition have presented this writ appeal. 2. A resolution has been passed by the Grama Panchayat identifying a particular place for the purpose of parking auto rickshaws. The resolution has been passed by the Grama Panchayat keeping in view the requirements of the citizens of the locality. Normally this court is not expected to supplement the decisions of a Grama Panchayat unless those decisions are either arbitrary, illegal or contrary to the statutory provisions. Keeping the aforesaid resolutions in view, the learned Single Judge, in our view, has rightly rejected the writ petition. In that view of the matter, we are of the opinion that this is not a fit case for us to interfere with the orders passed by the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, the writ appeal requires to be rejected and it is rejected. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (A.K.BASHEER) JUDGE jes