IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal First Bail Application No.1185 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Sohan Lal Dangwal ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party ________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.01/09 U/Ss 419/420/467/471/120-B IPC, Patwari Circle Gaumukh, Jakhnidhar, District Tehri Garhwal Dated: December 4, 2009 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. GA for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the road was constructed on the disputed land and for that land, the sale deed was executed by some other person and the applicant was cited as a witness in the sale deed. He further submitted that the applicant is not at all beneficiary and he has neither executed the sale deed nor received any money in pursuance of the said sale deed. He further submitted that as per the averments made in the FIR, no offence is constituted against the applicant and the dispute is purely civil in nature. He further submitted that he is in jail since 8.11.2009 and the trial has yet not been started. After considering all the facts and circumstances, on hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the contents of the FIR and other material on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant-Sohan Lal Dangwal be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and also on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Tehri Garhwal. The bail application is disposed of accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 04.12.2009 Rajeev Dang