6/ c565“ BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATNSGARH f AT BILASPUR f WP No. LZQ2¥0$ J t f; 1i é : ' S. R. G0ya§l s/o Shri MuranlaE Goya]! ' Ageci 58 years, r/o Nehru Ngagary Bhfilai, JDUUrg (CnGn) / Pm— M/S S R G Envestmem Consultant rSectorf$ Zonal Markat Hm an Durg (C G) Vs. RESPONDENT?» (J1) Nnnnsh Investment Prop Smt Sawm Sanghm w/o if Bhamt Bhnsnan Sanghan aged abont 47 years. ' (2) Venvenk‘ Tnvosnneni: T Prop-Emmi Bhnshan Sanghari s/o Tate Shni ChamanTaT Sanghni aged 55 yezn‘s Both Ir/o senior MTG: M \ RndmnabhpunDntg (C.G.) (3} Distt“ Consumer ReoressaT Forum, D‘urgtCG.) H e e ' trtton under Artrde 226/227 ofth Q5 12 20G3 I Shn T I: T1war1 coun‘: { Shrl P S Koshv Govt Heald A11 objection has respcndents regarding mair grounci thm thg order passec Drug 1‘s annealable and in ‘ ‘Shri‘ Tiwari submiis fhe State Rsdressal romm I; started mnctmmng He w Wlth llbertv to avall remedv I > The peuuon 1:: (helm ‘ a/vmlabk under The MW m e, mew of the IA No ?478/2003 Stand eel afied copv as per r1 el for the pentlonm Advocate for the btate ‘ ‘ been 1a1a€d by the COLulscl f01 ths tamabIhtV 0i the batman on the by the Dlstrlct Consumer Forum fa ‘t am dppwj was filed ,, that when he filed the wr1t netlton was not functmmng New, 1; 1$ Hts to WithdIaW Lhe Writ getitjion Imdar the law. needé as wiLhdra’wn with hbelu abév‘e, M.W.P.No. 1231/20e3, V ' I dlsr‘oseclzof. > les Kg _ f ’ ’ 5di- / Fakhruddm i