IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 10274 of 1999 Between: 1 D.K.Gopal Rao, S/o. Venkataram Narsaiah, Sri Saraswathi Grammena Bank, Rajampet (Asifabad) Branch, Adilabad District. 2 K.Surender Reddy, S/o. Buchi Reddy, Sri Saraswathi Grammena Bank, Kagaznagar Branch, Adilabad. 3 K.Ragotham Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Sri Saraswathi Grammena Bank, Dandepally Branch, Adilabad. 4 K.Pratap Reddy, S/o. Buchi Reddy, Sri Saraswathi Grammena Bank, Nirmal Branch, Adilabad. 5 Y.Panakal Rao, S/o. Neelakanta Rao, Sri Saraswathi Grammena Bank, Tandoor Branch, Adilabad. 6 K.Prabhakar Reddy, S/o. Rami Reddy, Sri Saraswathi Grammena Bank, DilwarpurBranch, Adilabad. 7 M.Venkateshwarlu, S/o. Appaiah, Sri Saraswathi Grammena Bank, Lokeshwaram Branch, Adilabad District. 8 A.Kishan, S/o. Venkatesham, Sri Saraswathi Grammena Bank, Karanji Branch, (Mandal-Jainalt via Gimma), Adilabad. 9 M.Ashanna Bakkanna Sri Saraswathi Grammena Bank, Hasnapur Branch, Adilabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND Sri Saraswathi Grameena Bank, Rep by its Chairman Adilabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ or order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus - i) declaring the action of the respondent in not following the RRD's (Appointment & Promotions of Officer and Employees) Rules, 1988 to fill up 16-Posts of Officers, MMGS-II Created vide Circular No. PER/11/98-99 dated. 27.6.1998 as illegal, and arbitrary; ii) direct the respondent to promote the petitioners by following the procedure envisaged under RRB's (Appointments & Promotions of Officers & Employees) Rules, 1988 to fill-up the 16 Posts of Officers MMGS-II created vide Cicular No. PER/11/98-99 date 27.6.1998; & iii) pass any such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.V.SURYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.M.VENKATESWER RAO The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 10274 of 1999 ORDER: Yesterday i.e. on 03.06.2009 when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners was absent. Hence the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal today. Even today also when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners is absent and there is no representation on his behalf. Counsel for the respondent is present. Hence the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No order as to costs. ---------------- 04.06.2009 kvsn THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 10274 of 1999 04.06.2009 Kvsn