^ ^ HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT B1LASPUR WRIT PETITION (8) No. 4052 of2008 s PETmONER 8mt Hemlata Raiigari, Aged about 38 yrg, W/o Shri Dewndra Raiigari Shiksha KMim^^^^^^^^^^V^ RA> Villege - Lanjoda, Block — Farasgaoii, Tahsil - Kondagaon, Distt. - Bastar (C<G.) j VERSU8 RESPONDEm'S : 1. State Govt. <rf> Chhattisgarh 'ITirough - The Seeretaiy, Pauchayat <& Gi'asiiiti Vikas Vibhag, Miiiistory, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. Cliief Executive Qfficer, Zila Paachayat, Distt. Uttar Bastar, Kanker, Distt.- Kanker (C.G.) WRniPETnigNUNDERARTICLE226QP;rHECQ^^ SB: Hon*ble Shri Sattsh K. Asnihotri, J. Present: Shri Somk^nt Verma, Advocate for the peritioner. Smt. Smita GhaA, Panel La'%yer fortfae StaWrespoadeiitl^o.l ORALORDER (Passed on 28tt day of July, 2008) 1. The petitioner is questioning fhe tegality and validfty ofthe order dated 23.05.2008 (Amiexure P/l), whereby the a{ipoirrtment ofthe petitioner on the post ofShiksha Karmi Grade IL has been cancetled. 2. The appointment and service conditions of Shiksha Kamiis are govemed by the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Shiksha Kamii (Recmitment and Conditions of Services), Rules, 2007 (for short 'the Rules, 2007). Rule 13 of the Rules, 2007 provides for statutory appeal a^inst any order passed under the Ajdhiniyam. 3. Once the law has been settled by this Court, it m necessary that the petitionen if aggrieved by termination, should take recourse to attemative statutory forum i.e. appeal under ihc provisions ofRule 13of the Rules, 2007. 4. The petitioner has approached fhis Court without taking recourse to altemative statutory remedy available to her. Ttes is not one ofthe case wherein the Hish Court should interfere in exercise of its power under z -2- Article 226 of fhe Constitution of Itidia, making departure from the normal mle of availing altemative statutory provisions first, before coming to this Court. 5. Thus, fhis petition is not maintainable on the ground of availability of altemaiive statutory remedy under the provisions ofRules, 2007< 6. The petition is accordingly dismissed. However, liberty is reserved to Ae petitioner to take recourse to altemative statutory remedy ttoat may be available to her- ifso advised. No order asto costs. 7. Consequently, I.A. No. 1, application tbr mterim relief. also stands disposed of. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Armt