IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13295 of 2010 MUKESH KUMAR RAI, S/O Late Vishwanath Rai, resident of Supaul Ward No. 25, P.S. Supaul, District-Supaul..............................................Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Rinki Devi, D/O Ramdeo Mandal, R/O Village- Kariho, P.S. and District- Supaul......................................................................Opposite Parties. ----------- - 3. 19.05.2010. In pursuance to undertaking from both sides as recorded in order dated 11.05.2010 that both sides are ready to resume the conjugal life without any condition the parties are physically present and both are undertaking to resume conjugal life. The complainant is apprehensive of her mother-in-law for which the husband undertakes that he will provide all security to the complainant. The complainant is ready to go to her matrimonial house with the husband from the court itself today alongwith one minor female child as the elder female child is already with the husband. In the aforesaid circumstances, let the petitioner, Mukesh Kumar Rai be released on provisional anticipatory bail for six months on his surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 361C of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Supaul, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Let the petitioner and the complainant appear before the 2 learned S.D.J.M., Supaul on 05.10.2010 and file a joint affidavit that they have resumed their conjugal life and on filing of such affidavit, the learned S.D.J.M., Supaul, will confirm the present provisional bail as well as dispose off the complaint case. In the meantime, the petitioner will not file an affidavit before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Saharsa to the effect that the matrimonial life has already been restored for disposal of Matrimonial(Restitution) Case No. MM 29 of 2009. It is expected that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Saharsa, will dispose off the aforesaid restitution case in view of the subsequent development. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)