APPLICANTS :- No Filed toda . by 5hr! ’ Ié! TQ/ [y/ For Registlar, M, P‘ Slate Aim, Tribunal, " RAIPUR IN THE MADHYA PRADESH ADMINISTRATI BENCH AT RAIPUR CHHATTISGARH wKfk) 7 X (“f/a) i: QAC@ OF 2001. Girdhari Singh Paikra, Son of Bhanwar Singh aged 33 years working as uppoer division teacher at Middle School Chorbhatti, Kartala District Korba resident ofvillage Chikni Pali Bhaisma, District Korba. 2. Smt. Anastaria Kujur, wife ofD.Kujur aged 33 years working as Upper division teacher at Adivasi Kanya Ashram, Rampur Kartala, District Korba resident ofvillage Jariatukutoli District Jashpur Nagar. 3. Thanduram Ranthia, Son ofJethuram aged 32 years working as Upper division teacher at Govt. Higher Secondary School, Kartala, District Korba, resident of village Ghinara Bhaisma, District Korba. 4. Smt. Swati Singh Tirki, wife of Dinkar Singh aged 25 years working as Upper division teacher as Adivasi Kanya Ashram Tilkeja, District'Korba, resident of Kadamtoli, Chholeng District Jashpur Nagar. Laxmi Narayan Kunwar, Son of Bisahuram, aged 34 years Working at AdivasiBalak Ashram, Sarbhonka, Pondiuproda, District Korba, resident of Village Gidhori, Dadarkala, District Korba. Tnlaram Kanwar‘ Son of Tijram Kanwar, aged 35 years, working as Upper division teacher at Govt. Higher Secondary School, Saragbundia, Kartala District Korba, resident ofvillage Suraidih Tilkeja, Bhaisma, District Korba. 7. Smt. Ahilya Paikra, aged 32 years, working as Upper division teacherat Middle School Ginabahar, District Jashpur resident ofGin bahar, District Jashpur. RESPONDENTS :- VERSUS The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department ofSchoolEducation, D.K.Bhawan, Raipur. Chhattisgarh. y 29?m V 2. The Director, Public Instructions School Education, Government ofChhattisgarh, Jail Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Assistant Commissioner, Adivasi Vikas, Government of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur dam/‘37 ’/‘<m5‘ ’ L xag iffcammzsi’weer g r, Government of Chhattisgarh, Korba Chl’rttisgarh nae/7k dam/0; Mar ado/w W . m‘nh MAJ dt‘eaanl’érg’va. Government of Chhattisgarh Jashpurnagar Chhattisgar . a3 K" Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985. ”>l am 113m; ‘w fCg) m3§63 $ V WW 200 W mmmm‘d WWW WWR $a1fmm SB : Hon’b!e shri Manindra Mohan Shr vastava, J. 18-03-2019 Shri M. D, Dhote, counselfor the peiitioners. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer brthe State/respondents. Heard, The petitioners have med this peti ion ciaiming the similar benefits as have been given to Asst. Teachers appointed n between the year 198349844 who had approached the Tribune! by tiiing Origin I Application Ne2745l1989 (decided on 24.8.1992), wherein Tribunal directed‘be efits to be given to all teachers lt is also stated that the State challenged the said rder before the Supreme Couvt in S.L.P. No.6892l1 993 which was dismissed vide rder dated 3‘1 .1994 ln number of cases, this Co rt has passed orders directing the respondente to consider the cases. Accordingly, this petition is also di posed of with liberty to the petitioners to make representation, if so advised, to c nsider their cases on its own merits and perspective. if the petitioners stand on the sa e footings as per order passed by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative T ibunal in OA No.2?45l89 (Madhukanz Yadu‘ano’ 56 others Vs, state std/LP. the Supreme Court in S_L.P. (Civil). N others) and subsequently confirmed by o.6892’93 by order dated 3.1 .1994, appropriate orderwould be passed by th respondents authority. Ti warm