IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 236 OF 2009 GOA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD THROUGH MEMBER SECRETARY ... Petitioner Versus MRS. MARIA DE LOURDES AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. D. Lawande, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. A. F. Diniz, Advocate for Respondent no. 1. Coram:- B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 20th April, 2009 ORAL ORDER (Per B. P. Dharmadhikari) Heard forthwith by consent. 2. Learned Advocate Shri Diniz appearing for respondent no.1 states that the respondent no.1 has got necessary permissions and has no objection if the prayers (a) and (b) in the Writ Petition are granted. Learned Senior Counsel states that issue is clearly covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Mr. C. Mehta v. Union of India reported in 2004 (12) SCC 118. 3. In view of the consent, we find that both prayers (a) and (b) can be granted. Both the prayers are accordingly granted. Writ Petition is allowed to that extent with no order as to costs. B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. U. D. SALVI, J. arp/*