IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** C.R. No.8223 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:17.12.2010 Sukhma .....Petitioner Vs. Raju and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present:- Mr. Atul Gaur, Advocate for the petitioner. **** Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) The plaintiff is in revision against the order passed by the learned trial Court on 16.11.2010 whereby an application filed by the plaintiff for further cross-examination of DW1 and DW2 was declined. It is the case of the petitioner that certain important questions could not be asked from the defendants' witnesses and, therefore, the said witnesses be summoned for further cross-examination. Once the witnesses have been cross-examined, the application of plaintiff for further cross-examination is not tenable. All relevant questions have to be asked when the witness was in the witness box. The process of further cross-examination is unknown to come. I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the learned trial court, which may warrant interference. Dismissed. December 17, 2010 ( HEMANT GUPTA ) renu JUDGE