IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8927 of 2009 RAM ISHWAR SINGH S/O-Late Sarjug Singh, R/O-Vill-Gorigawan, P.S.-Saraiya, Distt.-Muzaffarpur. ………………………………………Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………………………………………..Opposite Party. WITH Cr.Misc. No.7945 of 2009 KAUSHAL KISHORE SINGH S/O-Late Bajrangi Singh, R/O-Vill-Gonnigar, P.S.-Saraiya, Distt.-Muzaffarpur. ………………………………………Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………………………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 3/ 06.07.2009 Since both the above bail applications have arisen out of one occurrence, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Both the petitioners are named accused of the case which has been registered for the offences under Sections 302/120B/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation is that the named accused persons including the petitioners encircled the informant’s brother namely Lalbabu Singh. The informant saw that he was shotted by these two petitioners. Submission on behalf of the Ram 2 Ishwar Singh is that at the time of occurrence the night was dark so the claim of identification appears to be false. The post- mortem report does not support the versions of the informant. On behalf of petitioner Kaushal Kishore Singh it has been submitted that there was enmity from before and the deceased was killed by unknown miscreants. No doubt the deceased was having only one ante-mortem wound of entry but the allegation is against these two accused persons. Considering this, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. However, they may renew their prayers for bail in the court below after examination of the informant. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)