1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.2112 of NO.2112 of NO.2112 of 1985 Guest Keen Williams Ltd & anr .. Plaintiffs versus Bhoruka Roadlines P.Ltd .. Defendant Mr.Sanjeev Singh i/b Nari.& Nari.for Plaintiff None for Defendant CORAM CORAM CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J : D.G. KARNIK, J : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED DATED DATED : 12th August, 2005. : 12th August, 2005. : 12th August, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff. None present for the defendant. The defendant has not filed the written statement for nearly 20 years. Hence, the averments made in the plaint are deemed to be accepted. 2. The suit is for recovery of money. The suit is decreed under Order 8 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) 2 with the modification that interest would be payable at 9 % p.a. from the date of the suit till payment. D.G.KARNIK, J