Civil Revision No. 5215 of 2009 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5215 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.09.2009 Paramjit Singh ....Petitioner versus Srawan Singh and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present: - Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** VINOD K. SHARMA, J. (ORAL) CM No. 21669-CII of 2009 Allowed. The applicant-petitioner is exempted from filing certified copies of Annexures P-1 to P-3. CR No. 5215 of 2009 This revision petition is directed against the order dated 20.7.2009 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Dasua, vide which the evidence of the petitioner has been ordered to be closed. The order passed reads as under: - “Perusal of the file reveals that plaintiff has availed number of opportunities but he has not concluded his evidence even today. Despite the fact that he has availed number of opportunities even today no evidence is present for examination or cross- examination. So, evidence of plaintiff is closed by the order. No case is adjourned to 04.08.09 for evidence of defendant.” Civil Revision No. 5215 of 2009 (O&M) -2- The petitioner thereafter moved application for review of this order, which was also dismissed vide order dated 4.9.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not challenge the order on merits and prays that in the interest of justice, the petitioner may be granted one last opportunity to conclude his evidence at his own risk and responsibility. In view of the stand taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merits of the case, I feel that interest of justice would be served if the petitioner is granted one last opportunity to conclude his entire evidence at his own risk and responsibility on the date to be fixed by the learned trial Court. However, this shall be subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) as costs. Disposed of. (Vinod K. Sharma) Judge September 11, 2009 R.S.