IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42000 of 2009 SMT.BACHCHI DEVI @ BACHCHI DEVI . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 02.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It appears that the petitioner was granted provisional bail on 6.9.2007 while calling for the case diary holding that the confirmation shall depend on the nature of the materials contained in the diary. On 6.2.2008 learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he had no instruction as the petitioner despite repeated communications was not contacting him. The application then came to be dismissed with directions to surrender and seek regular bail. The application for restoration has been filed more than one and half years later. This Court is not satisfied with the explanation in that regard contained in paragraph 3 of the application. The application for restoration is rejected. Any application for regular bail on her behalf is required to be considered by the court below on its own merits without being prejudiced by the present order. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)