IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated :Nainital : the 15th day of June, 2010 1st Bail Application No. 574 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Kunal ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ……..Opposite Party _______________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 16/65/2010, U/s 366-A, 376, 504 & 506 IPC, PS Nehru Colony, District Dehradun. June 15, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER,J. Heard Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant argued that as per the medical report of the victim Km. Aanchal, she is more than 18 years old. He further argued that the victim in her statement recorded under Section 164 CrPC has stated nothing against the applicant accused. She has even refused to go with her parents. He further submitted that the medical report does not corroborate the allegation of rape made against the applicant accused. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of FIR, medical reports of the victim and her statement recorded under Section 164 CrPC; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Kunal be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of CJM, Dehradun. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 15.6.2010 PRABODH