IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4061 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Birendra Kumar 2. Dr Krishna Kumar 3. Anil Kumar All sons of Late Gyan Chand Prasad @ Chandeshwar Prasad, resident of village- Netar, P.S. Fatuha Old, Daniyawan New, District Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Baleshwar Prasad 3. Kameshwar Prasad 4. Rajendra Prasad 5. Uma Shankar Prasad 6. Kumar Narendra All sons of Late Ram Swaroop Mahto, resident of village- Akair, P.s. Chandi, District Nalanda 7. Mintu Prasad son of Rajendra Jamadar, resident of village Arai Benipur, P.S. Daniyawan, District Patna 8. Swapna Sinha W/o Nikhil Kumar Sinha, resident of village- Khushrupur, P.S. Khushrupur, District Patna at present m-34/I, Kharangajhar, Telco Colony, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum (Jharkhand) 9. Praveen Kumar Sinha S/o Ranjeet Kumar Singh, resident of village- Khushrupur, P.S. Khushrupur, District Patna 10. Smt. Kiran Devi W/o Lal Babu Jamadar, resident of village- Arai Benipur, P.S. Daniyawan, District Patna 11. Smt. Sarswati Devi W/o Rajendra Jamadar, resident of village- Arai Benipur, P.S. Daniyawan, District Patna 12. Sri Raman Kumar Sinha S/o not known to the petitioners Sub divisional Officer- cum- DCLR, Patna City 13. Lal Mohan Singh S/o not known to the petitioners officer-In charge, Daniyawan, P.S. District Patna 14. Rajandhari Prasad son of not known to the petitioners Revenue Karamchari, Khushrupur, District Patna 15. Sanjay Kumar Singh s/o not known to the petitioners, District Magistrate-cum- Collector, Patna 16. Sri Akhil Kumar Mallick son of not known to the petitoners Circle Officer, Khushrupur, District Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Sachin GP 24 Mr Siddharth Shankar Pandey, AC to GP 24 ====================================================== 2 01-12-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Patna High Court MJC No.4061 of 2011 (2) dt.01-12-2011 2 Petitioners want the opposite parties to be punished and Jamabandi created in favour of private respondents be cancelled on the ground that petitioners have been successful in civil litigation. We do not find any case of contempt being made out in this matter. This contempt application is, therefore, dismissed. If the petitioners are already armed with judgment and decree of civil court in their favour, they will be at liberty to challenge the order of mutation or Jamabandi through appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. sk (Shiva Kirti Singh, J) (Shivaji Pandey, J)