S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 4214/2007 (Bhupindra Rawal Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 17/09/2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Pradeep Shah for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and challan papers. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that no overt act has been assigned to the present petitioner and the petitioner has not inflicted any injury to the deceased. The allegation of causing injury to the deceased is against Karansingh who inflicted injury by sword and Hukamsingh who alleged to have inflicted injury on the leg of the deceased by iron rod. Be that as it may, since no overt act has been assigned to the present petitioner and as per the eye witnesses, no injury has been caused to the deceased by the present petitioner, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Bhupindra Rawal S/o Shri Arjun Lal Rawall be released on bail in FIR No. 171/07 P.S. Surajpole, Udaipur, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP