IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.39582-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION:31.8.2006 Ashok Chaudhary ..........Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & Anr. ..........Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present:- Shri B.S. Tewatia, Advocate for Shri Ashok Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Partap Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** Petitioner Ashok Chaudhary apprehending his arrest in a non- bailable offence in a complaint case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act titled as M/s BIL Investment Ltd. Vs. Ashok Chaudhary has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail. Counsel for the petitioner contends that in this case since the complainant has withdrawn his complaint, therefore, this petition has become infructuous as may be dismissed as such. Ordered accordingly. August 31, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) pooja JUDGE