IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1111 of 2010 MITHILESH PASWAN & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 09.03.2010 The petitioners apprehend their arrest in complaint case No. 271 of 2009 under Sections 379, 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Heard. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner No.1 is the complainant’s Gotni’s brother, petitioner No.2 is Gotni’s father, petitioner No. 3 is the Gotni’s uncle, petitioner No.4 is Gotni’s aunt, petitioner No.5 Gotni’s sister and petitioner No.6 is Gotni’s mother. It is submitted that the allegation is of general and omnibus nature and that distant relatives like petitioners who were not involved in the alleged occurrence have been made accused in the case. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest/surrender within the period of two weeks, the petitioners, namely, 1. Mithilesh Paswan, 2. Arjun Paswan, 3. Gurudas Paswan, 4. Rinku Devi 5. Sangita Kumari and 6. Panma Devi @ Panwa Devi, each of them is admitted to anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, in complaint case No. 271C/2009, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (C.M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-