1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.11.2016 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA Application Nos.434 to 437 of 2011 in C.S.No.339 of 2011 P.S. THUYA ...PETITIONER Vs 1 A. ALEX RAJA 112 2ND MAIN ROAD CHENNAI 58 2 A. AROCKIA RAHUL 3 CHENNAI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY CHENNAI 8 4 THE CORPORATION OF CHENNAI REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER CHENNAI 3 ... RESPONDENTS Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of C.P.C praying to (i) pass an order of Interim Injunction restraining the Defendants 1 and 2 their men agents servants or anyone claiming through them from interfering with my peaceful possession of the property morefully described in the Schedule A hereunder; (ii) to pass an order of ad-Interim mandatory Injunction directing the defendants 1 and 2 to remove the illegal and unauthorized 2 structures erected in a portion of the property belonging to me morefully described in the Schedule A; (iii) to pass an order of Interim Injunction restraining the respondents 3 and 4/defendants 3 and 4 their men agents servants or anyone claiming through them from considering any application that may be submitted by the 1st and 2nd respondents/1st and 2nd defendants seeking for planning permission building permit in respect of the property and (iv) to pass an order of Interim Injunction restraining the 1st and 2nd respondent/1st and 2nd defendants their men agents servants or anyone authorized by them from encumbering alienating or dealing with the property or putting up any construction in the property or putting up any construction in the property belonging to me morefully described in the schedule 'A' hereunder. For Applicant : Ms.Vasudha Thiagarajan For Defendants 1 and 2: Mr.N.Anand Venkatesh For Defendant 3 : Mr.C.Johnson For Defendant 4 : No Appearance Advocate Commissioner: Ms.Abitha O R D E R Already, this Court has passed an order dated 29.04.2011 and in para 5 of the said order, it has been observed as follows:- "In such circumstances, I pass a very limited order to the effect that anything done by the respondents, pending further orders on these petitions, will be at their own risk and costs". 3 2. The said limited order would continue till the disposal of the suit. 3. With the above said observation, this application is closed. 02.11.2016 (1/2) srn 4 PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J srn Application No.4343 to 437 of 2011 in C.S.No.339 of 2011 02.11.2016 http://www.judis.nic.in