1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. SUIT NO. 444 OF 2006 Narendra Jagdish Agarwal .... Plaintiff vs Martin Francis D’Mello & ors. ... Defendants Mr.Mahendra Bajpao with Mr. R. J. Singh for the plaintiff. Mr. N.G. Korekar for defendants 1 to 6. Ms.Uma Palsuledesai, AGP for defendants 7 and 8. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 27th August, 2009 P.C.: 1 The parties had arrived at Settlement and accordingly signed the Consent Terms dated 22.07.2009. It is also signed by their respective Advocates i.e. the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 6. The matter was adjourned twice for instructions so far as defendants 7 and 8 are concerned. They have filed affidavit dated 24.08.2009 and affidavit dated 26.08.2009. They have no objection, if order is passed in terms of the consent terms filed. 2 Taking note of the affidavit as well as the consent terms, I am inclined to dispose of this matter in terms of consent terms. 3 The statements are made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties 2 that the consent terms is well within the frame work of the law and the record. There is no dispute about the identification, authorisation and the signature. 4 The Suit is, therefore, disposed of in terms of Consent Terms, marked “X” with liberty. No costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)