IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2134 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: January 27, 2011. J.K.Jain ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus Nalwa Sons Investments Ltd. (formerly known as Jindal Strips Ltd.) and others. ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. None for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside impugned order dated 15.02.2010 passed by learned Civil Judge(Junior Division), Hisar vide which application of petitioner-plaintiff for ordering the defendants No.4 and 5 to produce the original alleged transferred deed of 500 shares as well as original 500 shares certificate, was declined. CR No.2134 of 2010 I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record including the impugned order passed by learned trial Court. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner- plaintiff that respondents No.4 and 5-defendants No.4 and 5 have admitted that original 500 shares certificate and original transfer deed in respect thereof are in possession of respondent No.4-defendant No.4 and despite that application of petitioner-plaintiff for production of those documents was dismissed by learned trial Court with the observation that the documents can be summoned by the petitioner-plaintiff in evidence. On the other hand, it has been contended by learned counsel for respondents No.4 and 5 that the case is already fixed for evidence of petitioner-plaintiff and the petitioner has also summoned officials of respondents No.1 to 3 alongwith the said documents. It has also been contended that photocopies of these shares are already attached with the written statement of respondents-defendants No.4 and 5. Hence, in view of these facts, the present revision petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.4 to produce the original documents, which are stated to be in his possession, at the time of examination of witnesses by petitioner-plaintiff. However, it is made clear that nothing observed herein shall be construed to have any bearing on the decision of this case on merit by learned trial Court. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) January 27, 2011. JUDGE 2 CR No.2134 of 2010 'om' 3