IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.461 of 2010 1. SUBHASH PRASAD SINGH 2. RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH @ RAJEEV KUMAR & 3. SANJAY KUMAR @ SANJAY KR.SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 21.05.2010. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case under sections 304B, 201 and 120B of the I.P.C. Petitioner no.1 is father-in-law, whereas rest are his sons. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in fact prosecution side has forcibly taken away the girl and has either hid her or has married her in Uttar Pradesh. Referring to para 18 and 19 of the case diary, independent witnesses, namely, Saroj Kumar Jha and Ashok Singh have stated that the girl is in custody of the informant. The Dy. S. P. in supervision note has recommended for filing of charge sheet only under sections 364 and 365 of the I.P.C. The informant alleges that earlier accused persons tortured his daughter for which Complaint case no. 476 of 2006 was lodged in which compromise was arrived at between the parties. Informant further alleges that accused persons used to demand Rs.1 lakh, Colour television, motorcycle etc. In the facts of the case, let the petitioner no. 2 and 3 as above be released on bail in the event of surrender within six weeks on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in Banka Police Station case no. 206 of 2007. This application in respect of petitioner no.1 as above is - 2 - dismissed with direction to surrender and seek regular bail, which would be disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)