IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33072 of 2009 DILIP YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.9.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a Police case under Section 392 of the Penal Code. The submission is that co-accused who named the petitioner has himself been enlarged on bail in Cr. Misc. No. 1489 of 2009. Co-accused has been enlarged on bail after approximately six months of custody. The prayer for bail is rejected. If the petitioner files an application for regular bail before the Court below after completing like period of custody, the Court below shall proceed to consider the same in accordance with law keeping in mind that this Court had in fact granted bail to a co-accused who has named the petitioner, without being prejudiced by the present order. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)