IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.6703 of 1996 Between: S.V. Panthulu S/o. Hanumantha Rao R/o R.P.Road, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of A.P. rep. by Secretary, Panchayat Raj Rural Development & R (MDL-II) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Special Officer, A.P. State Chambers of Panchayati Raj, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of CERTIORARI calling for records relating to the impugned order of termination of services of the petitioner issued by the 2nd respondent in proceedings No. B1/434/90 dt, 8-2-96 and quashing it as arbitrary, unjust, unconstitutional and violating of principles of natural justice, and therefore illegal, improper and void and consequently directing the respondents to continue the services of the petitioner as per the contract agreement upto March, 1997. Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. P.PHALGUNA RAO Counsel for Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: Sri S. Venugopal, learned counsel representing Sri P. Phalguna Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. 23-12-2004 prk ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies