IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21150 of 2010 PRAMOD CHOUDHARY S/O GAJO CHAUDHARY, R/O VILLAGE-LALMATIYA, P.S. BARHAT, DISTRICT- JAMUI. --PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 2 03.08.2010 Heard Sri Pankaj Kr. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri U.S.P. Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Sri Prabhat Ranjan Singh for the complainant. Petitioner is named accused in this case, being husband of the complainant, carry allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. Earlier there was amicable settlement between the parties but it could not survived as per petitioner, father of the complainant is the root cause who insisted the petitioner to reside at his house whereas petitioner is ready to lead marital life with his wife, the complainant, at his own place. There is no application filed at the instance of petitioner seeking restitution of conjugal life. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today and simultaneous production of copy of 2 restitution petition filed before Family Court with undertaking to remain physically present in that case also on the dates fixed by the Court and assist in negotiation for amicable settlement, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in Complaint Case no. 1195 C of 2009, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date before the court below at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad