IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT MONDAY, THE 16TH JULY 2007 / 25TH ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 20151 of 2007(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ HUTCHISON ESSAR CELLULAR LTD., ASHISH BUILDING, COCHIN-31, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER LEGAL, RAJESH MELETH VEETTIL, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.RAGHAVAN MELETHVEETTIL. BY ADV. SRI.P.SATHISAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, ERNAKULAM. 2. JESSY THOMAS,W/O.THOMAS VALOOR HOUSE, VARAKKARA, AMBALLUR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPUAM TALUK. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV.SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 20151 of 2007(Y) APPENDIX EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF LICENCE AGREEMENT EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF AMENDMENT IN THE LEASE AGREEMENT DATED 3.4.02 ISSUED BY SANCHAR BHAVAN NEW DELHI. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED BY MANNAMPETTA GRAMA PANCHAYAT DATED 12.12.06. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF STOP MEMO ISSUED BY SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, THRISSUR DATED 01.01.07. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN M.C.NO.1/2007. /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE R.BASANT, J = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C). No.20151 Of 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 16th day of July, 2007 JUDGMENT Against the petitioner a conditional order under Sec.133 Cr.P.c. was passed. The proceedings were registered as M.C.No.1/2007 before the Sub Divisional Magistrate Court, Thrissur. The petitioner entered appearance before the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate and did show cause against the conditional order. The grievance of the petitioner is that no action has been taken further to the filing of the statement. The notice was issued to the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate. The learned Sub Divisional Magistrate has filed a statement to inform the Court that the case now stands posted to 10.8.07. It is undertaken that the final disposal of the case shall be done within one month from 16.7.07. 2. In the light of the undertaking by the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, I am satisfied that no further directions need be issued in this writ petition. Accepting the said submissions of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, this writ petition is dismissed. It is directed that compliance of the undertaking must be reported to this Court after the said period. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) sj /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE