IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.185 of 2008 PRAMOD NARAIN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the appellant: Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Sanjay Kumar No. I, G.P. XII ------- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal -------- Dated, the 29th July, 2008. A perusal of the order dated 13.11.2007, impugned in the appeal, shows that the writ petition was permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the parent department for redressal of his grievance. 2. The counsel submits that as a matter of fact, he sought adjournment on that date from the court and never wanted to withdraw the writ petition. The statement recorded in the order has to be treated as correct. If a party disputes the correctness of any statement in the order, the remedy in law to such party is to apply for review of the order. Admittedly, that has not been done. That leads us to infer that there is no merit in the submission that no prayer for withdrawal of the writ application was made. Since the writ petition - 2 - has been withdrawn, the appellant cannot be permitted to challenge the order in appeal. 3. L.P.A. is dismissed accordingly. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J. Anil/