cn z: tf',- ^ ^.^f^g ^" r^^^!?^" INvLI: IjtNV^ In the Honble High Court of Chhattishgarh at Bilaspur (C.G.) W.P. (S) No. ^ 200@^ Petitioner ,^5/ ^Y^'^ ^§F /^Q/' ..''"'<^y' ..'•'' /''..'o^ / ^R^spondent... [<7- .00'^ ,6' Devesh Prasad, Aged 43 years, S/o Late Shri Ratneshwar Prasad, Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bastar, (C.G.) VERSUS 1 .Jhe State Government of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) /2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Ravishankar University Complex, Raipur (C.G.) k^^ /3. Assistant Commissioner Tribal welfare Department, Jagdalpur, ^^ Collec^^<s^-Jagdalpur(C.G.) ^ Principal Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bastar (C.G.) Writ petition ynder articles 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance gf writ in the nature of MANDAMUS, Certiorari, Prohibiti^n and other suitable WRIT or writs, Order or orders^ Direction or directions. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISeARH AT BIb^SPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI J. Petjtipner WRTT PETTTION fS.l N0.72 OF 2007 : Oevesh Prasad versus Respondents PcLtitjoner The State fiovernment of Qihat^i^arh and others And WRIT PETTTION CS.) N0.74 OF 2007 Parsodi Ram Sahu versus ftespondents The State fiovcynnient of ChhattiS9arh cnd others Present : Mr. Ajoy Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner(s). Mr. Arvind bubey. Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORbER (Passed on -riiis 16th doy of January. 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/re^iondents jointty submit that the facts and <^jestion of kw mvolved in the present writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwwvl- Kwnar Bhfuwhwj ¥S. Mimfe^ol Cwporotion, Owy cwfel aiwtlw^. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitiwis are disyosed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yoahwant ^ww ffioawdwaj (Supra), subject to verification of +he fact as to whether -the petitioners have ocquired B.EdYB.TJ. Certificates at their owi expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and fur+her whether they have been paid •h»oadvance HTcrements or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the conrwcted wit petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhash 1 20060I)MPJR-CG96 1 s. ^