IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20285 of 2011 Pappu Das And Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. ----------- 02. 14.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 900/2010, pending in the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar Motihari, East Champaran, being husband, mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the complainant, with allegation of some demand of dowry, torture etc. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner no. 1, who intends to resume and continue marital life with the complainant who is blessed with a male child. Through other petitioners also there is an offer to properly take care of her. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of filing an application before the court below stating all such intention and in order to pay a sum of Rs. 500/- per month by way of ad interim maintenance to the complainant subject to any order of competent court on the point, and in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the petitioner, namely, Pappu Das, 2 Most. Kanti Devi and Ruma Devi, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Complaint Case No. 900/2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition with respect to petitioner on. 1 to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)