1 wp7263-09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa WRIT PETITION NO. 7263 OF 2009. Rajkumar F. Dharu .. Petitioner. v/s. Mhasku Kanhu Alhat Since deceased through his legal heirs, Mirabai Mhasku Alhat & Ors. .. Respondents. .... Mr. R. S. Apte, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr. Mandar Limaye for the Petitioner. Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr. S. V. Sadavarte for Respondent Nos. 1 to 9 and 15 to 19. Mr. S. M. Railkar for Respondent Nos. 11 to 13. Mr. K. Y. Mandlik for Respondent No.20. Mr. S. N.. Bhosale, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 21 to 24. .... CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATE : AUGUST 10, 2010. P.C. Mr. Apte, the learned counsel for the Petitioner at the outset seeks leave to delete the names of Respondent Nos. 10 and 14. Leave as prayed for is granted at his own risk. 2 wp7263-09 2. The Petitioner and rests of the Respondents have settled their dispute amicably and filed collectively the Minutes of Order in three sets. The Minutes of order are taken on record and marked “X-1”, “X-2” and “X-3”. The said Minutes of Order are signed by the Petitioner, Respondent Nos. 1 to 9, 11 to 13 and 15 to 20. The Minutes of Order are also signed by the learned counsel of Petitioner, Respondent Nos. 1 to 9 and 15 to 20. The Petitioner and Respondent Nos. 1, 5, 11 to 13 and 17 to 20 are present before the Court. Parties have agreed for setting aside the impugned order in the petition and prayed for order in terms the Minutes of Order and remand the matter back to the Collector for decision afresh. Order in terms of Minutes of Order handed in. 3. The Collector Pune shall decide the Petitioner and Respondent No. 20’s application for permission under Section 5 of Bombay Inferior Village Watan Abolition Act, 1958, afresh, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order. 4. Since Respondent Nos. 11 to 13 are appearing in person, 3 wp7263-09 Mr. Railkar, the learned counsel initially appearing for those Respondent is discharged. 5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. [ R. V. MORE, J. ]