IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A. No. 4289 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: November 29, 2011 Manjit Singh .. Appellant Vs. Jarnail Singh .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. D.S. Gill, Advocate for the appellant. A.N. Jindal, J The plaintiff- appellant had filed a suit for the recovery of `3,87,000/- i.e. `2,25,000/- as principal amount and `1,62,000/- on account of interest @ 2% per mensum on the basis of the promissory note and receipt Ex.P1 and P2 respectively. However, the trial court vide judgment dated 8.10.2009 partly decreed the suit by passing judgment and decree for recovery of `2,25,000/- along with interest @ 9% per annum on the principal amount from the date when it had become due till passing of the judgment and decree by the trial court and 6% per annum till realization of the decretal amount. The appeal preferred by the defendant was also dismissed on 30.3.2010 by the Appellate Court. Hence this regular second appeal. The case is based on promissory note Ex.P1 and receipt Ex.P2 which stand duly proved by Jarnail Singh (PW2) and Jagtar Singh (PW3), both attesting witnesses to the promissory note. The plaintiff himself has also proved the passing of the consideration thereunder. No evidence has been led by the defendant in order to rebut the evidence as produced by the plaintiff and also to prove if it was otherwise a forged or fake document. No question of law much less substantial question of law arises in this case for determination. Dismissed. November 29, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge