1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3569 OF 2010 Kishan s/o. Baburao Adsul & Ors. ....Petitioners. Versus Nivruti s/o. Namdeorao Gambhire & Ors. ....Respondents. Mr. P.B. Rakhunde, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. R.M. Gaikwad & Mr. R.V. Gore, Advocates for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 21st February, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard Advocate P.B. Rakhunde for the petitioner and Advocate Gore for respondents. 2. The stay of proceedings before the Trial Court was sought under section 10, C.P.C., contending that the second appeal is pending. Advocate Rakhunde states that the second appeal was restored and then dismissed in default. He therefore contends that reasons given for rejection are not proper. However, in view of the dismissal of the second appeal, it is apparent that application under section 10 of C.P.C. itself is rendered infructuous. 2 3. Mr. Gore Advocate, for respondents submits that proceedings are going on since 1976. 4. As such proceedings are expedited and the Trial Court is directed to decide the same within 6 months from the date of communication of this order to it. As the matter is of 1976 parties are directed not to seek adjournment on the ground that their advocates are not available. If parties wish they can file Vakalatnama of alternate advocates to conduct matter so as to enable the Court to proceed in the matter on scheduled dates. 5. With these directions and observations, petition is disposed of. [ B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.] ssc/wp3569.10