IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.5423 of 2006 Date of Decision:- 22.1.2008 Rattan Singh ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.G.S.Duhan, Advocate vs. Smt.Kamla ....Respondent(s) through Mr.J.P.Dhull, Advocate. *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) The petitioner-husband is aggrieved at the order dated 5.6.2006 passed by the learned District Judge, Kaithal, who in the execution proceedings initiated by the respondent-wife, has directed the Military Authorities to deduct one-third of the pension payable to the petitioner and deposit the same in Punjab National Bank for being paid to the respondent- wife towards arrears of maintenance/monthly maintenance awarded to her by the learned District Judge, Kaithal vide his order dated 11.5.2005. Since the Executing Court has directed deduction of only one- third of the pension payable to the petitioner, it does not amount to “attachment” of the pension of the petitioner, as prohibited by Section 11 of the Pension Act, 1871. In this view of the matter, no interference in the impugned order is warranted. This revision petition is accordingly dismissed with costs of Rs.5,000/-. January 22, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE