Civil Revision No. 6243 of 2008 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6243 of 2008 Date of Decision: 23.11.2009 The Faridkot Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd., Faridkot ......Petitioner Versus Tejinder Singh Danewalia and another .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Rahul Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for the respondents. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral). Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 29.9.2008 passed by the Executing Court, whereby the property of the petitioner was ordered to be sold for the reason of non payment of the decretal amount. The sole argument raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in pursuance of the Award rendered by the Land Acquisition Collector, the petitioner has deposited the amount of Civil Revision No. 6243 of 2008 [2] solatium and such amount of solatium is liable to be deducted while determining the total amount payable to the land owners. There cannot be any exception to the argument raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Any payment made by the Judgment Debtor is to be adjusted while computing the decretal amount. The calculation of the amount due in terms of the market value determined by the competent Court is required to be carried out in terms of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gurpreet Singh v. Union of India, (2006)8 Supreme Court Cases 457. In view of the said fact, I do not find any patent illegality or material illegality in the impugned order, which may warrant interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed. If the calculations are not made in terms of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gurpreet Singh's case (supra), it shall be open to the petitioner to move an appropriate application before the Executing Court, which shall decide the same, in accordance with law. [ HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 23-11-2009 ds