IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45221 of 2010 1. SURAJ MANJHI S/O LATE BABI CHAND MANJHI 2. BILASH MAHTO @ RAM BILASH MAHTO S/O LATE RAMANAND MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the state. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147,148,436,307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act and 3/4 Explosive Substance Act. Considering that the petitioners are in custody since 4.9.2010 and 23.9.2010 for having misused the privilege of bail for about six years and now the petitioners undertake to be more careful in future, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-II, Jehanabad in connection with Ghoshi P.S. Case No. 190/96 , subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he 2 is related with the petitioners and the other bailors shall be the son/brother of the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it positively within a period of nine months since the occurrence is of the year 1996. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)