IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PIL PIL PIL WRIT PETITION NO. 29 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 29 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 29 OF 2006 M/s. Morries Securities Pvt. Ltd. ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. Dena Bank & 7 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. D.V. Merchant i/b M/s. Rajani Associates for the petitioner. Mr. Mustafa Motiwala i/b M/s. PDS Legal for the respondent No.1. Mr. S.A. Bhalwal i/b M/s. Vyas & Bhalwal for respondent No.2. Mr. J.S. Saluja i/b M/s. M.V. Kini & Co. for respondent No.3. Ms. Sherlie D’Souza i/b M/s. Umesh Shetty & Co. for respondent No.6. Mr. A.S. Doctor i/b M/s. Kanga & Co. for respondent No.7. Dr. Virendra Tulzapurkar, senior counsel with Ms. Rajani Iyer, senior counsel Mr. Vikram Trivedi, Mr. S.R. Tilokchandani i/b M/s. M.K. Ambalal & Co. for the respondent No.8. CORAM: R.M. LODHA & S.A. BOBDE, JJ. DATED: 12TH OCTOBER, 2006 P.C. : . We heard the senior counsel for the petitioner and perused the Writ Petition. : 2 : 2. In our considered view, the sale of debentures by five public sector banks, namely, respondents Nos.1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 do not give rise to any issue of public interest warranting consideration in the public interest litigation. 3. We, accordingly, decline to entertain the Writ Petition and it is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [S.A. [S.A. [S.A. BOBDE, J.] BOBDE, J.] BOBDE, J.]