Civil Revision No. 6006 of 2009 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 6006 of 2009 Date of Decision: 8.10.2010 Ranjit Singh …Petitioner Versus Surinder Singh …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Divanshu Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Avinash Mandla, Advocate for the respondent. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) In the present case, the Rent Controller, Patiala, vide his order dated 5.3.2009, has determined the rate of rent at Rs.650/- per month and held that the tenant is in arrears of rent w.e.f. 1.1.1993. When the impugned order was passed by the Rent Controller, a judgment in Rakesh Wadhawan and Others v. M/s Jagdamba Industrial Corporation and Others (Civil Appeal No. 2235 of 1999) had been pronounced by Hon'ble the Apex Court, therefore, he was bound by the ratio of law propounded in the said case. In consonance thereof, the Rent Controller has granted a period of two months to the tenant to pay the arrears of rent at the rate of Rs.650/- per month. It is not disputed that the impugned order has been complied with by the Civil Revision No. 6006 of 2009 2 tenant and all the arrears have been paid. Thus, this Court cannot come to the rescue of the petitioner/landlord especially when the Rent Controller has acted in accordance with the ratio of law laid down in Rakesh Wadhawan's case (supra). Hence, the present revision is hereby dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge October 8, 2010 “DK”