THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.28178 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus the action of the respondents in dispossessing the petitioner from the agricultural land of 5.00 acres in R.S.No.1/P of Yendada Village, Visakhapatnam (Rural) Mandal without deciding his title and without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents not to disturb the peaceful possession of the petitioner without following due process of law.” Earlier, the petitioner approached this Court by filing W.P.No.18432 of 2007, in which, she alleged that she is the owner and possessor of dry land of an extent of Acs.5.00 covered by Survey Nos.1/P, Yendada Village, Visakhapatnam (Rural) Mandal, Visakhapatnam. It was her case that her husband being an Ex-service man was assigned the said land by the Tahsildar on 22.05.1982 vide proceedings in Rc.No.389/82. It was her further case that though she is the rightful owner as she succeeded to the said land from her late husband, who was an Ex-serviceman and in whose favour, the above said land was assigned, the respondents were taking steps to transfer the land to Visakhapantam Urban Development Authority (VUDA) for the purpose of development without taking any steps against the petitioner. When such assignment was disputed, following the earlier order, dated 08.12.2006 passed in a similar writ petition i.e. W.P.No.24944 of 2006, this Court passed order, dated 11.09.2007 directing the Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam to conduct enquiry as to the genuineness or otherwise of the assignment claimed by the petitioner. In this writ petition, it is the grievance of the petitioner that in spite of the direction issued by this Court in W.P.No.18432 of 2007, without considering her claim and without conducting any enquiry thereon, the steps are being taken to dispossess her from the land in question. When the matter is taken up today, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent - VUDA has produced before this Court a copy of the order bearing Rc.No.424/2008/SPl RI, dated 24.12.2008, by which, the second respondent - Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam (Rural) while recording findings to the effect that no assignment was made in favour of late husband of the petitioner and he is never in possession and occupation of the land in question, rejected his claim. In view of the reasoned order, dated 24.12.2008 passed by the second respondent rejecting the claim of late husband of the petitioner, this Court cannot grant any relief to the petitioner as prayed by her in this writ petition. If she is aggrieved, she has to question such order. Granting liberty to the petitioner to question the order, dated 24.12.2008 passed by the second respondent, this writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 9th JULY, 2010. kvni