1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.512 OF 2008 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.7 OF 2009 M/s.Elektronik Lab & Ors. ....Appellants V/s. Jinofer Bhujwala & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.Dinyar Madon, Senior Counsel with M/s.Sonali Jain i/b Dave & Co. the Appellant. Mr.Chirag Balsara with Mr.Arun Mehta and Mr.Muniya Phophale i/b Akshar Laws for Respondent No.1. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 25TH JUNE, 2009. P.C. : 1. We have heard Mr.Madon, the learned Senior Counsel i/b M/s.Dave & Co. for the Appellants. Mr.Balsara appears for Respondent No.1. 2. The impugned order dated 21.11.2008 is an ad-interim order in Notice of Motion No.3975 of 2008 which was made returnable on 15.12.2008. We are informed that the same Notice of Motion is still pending, and it is stated that on the ground of 2 pendency of this appeal. It goes without saying that the ad-interim is on a prima-facie view and pending Motion will have to be decided, on merits. We do not see any reason to interfere with such interlocutory order. 3. The pending Notice of Motion would be heard and decided without being influenced by any observations made in the impugned ad-interim order dated 21.11.2008. 4. In the premises the Appeal is dismissed. 5. The Motion for interim relief in this Appeal does not survive and hence the same is also accordingly dismissed. (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)