GPN-J.332-ARCHB-8.94-1310500-ALA4 Spl-H.C.A.S.C.D.79e FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 8761 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 8761 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 8761 OF 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. -------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Niranjan P. Shimpi for Petitioner. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO,J. DATED : JANUARY 20, 2005 P.C. . There are two concurrent findings of fact that the petitioner has been unable to produce any documentary evidence to show that the construction was legal and unauthorised. The contention of the petitioner is that he had sought to lead evidence before the appellate authority to show that he had deemed permission under the M.R.T.P. Act. That by itself would not be sufficient as permission is also required under the Municipal Corporation Act. If the Petitioner is having any documentary evidence to show that he has necessary permission, liberty to him to apply to the trial court for reviewing of the order. With the above, petition stands disposed of. (F.I. REBELLO,J.)