IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 14TH OCTOBER 2011 / 22ND ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 27239 of 2011(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.MAYILSWAMY,S/O.THANNASI GOUNDER, RESIDING AT 'AVANTHIKA',NATTUKAL PO,CHITTUR, PALAKKAD 678 554. BY ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.JIBU P THOMAS SRI.P.S.APPU SRI.A.R.NIMOD SRI.C.A.ANOOP RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,BUILDING SECTION,CHITTUR, THATHAMANGALAM,PALAKKAD 678 101. 2. THE DAIRY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,PATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 004. 3. THE DAIRY EXTENSION OFFICER, NATTUKA PO, CHITTUR,PALAKKAD 678 554. GP MOHAMMED SHAH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 27239 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION WHICH HAS BEEN COUNTER SIGNED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT DATED 10.3.06 EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 28.1.05 EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 13.3.06 EXT.P4- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 11.2.10 (True copy) P.A To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).27239/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 14th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT According to the petitioner, a building bearing door No.14/493 of Kozhinjampara Panchayath in Palakkad District owned by him has been let out to the Dairy Development for accompanying the office of the Dairy Extension Officer. By Ext.P1, petitioner sought revision of rent. Since there was no response, reminder by way of Ext.P4 has been made. Even thereafter, there was no response and therefore, the writ petition is filed. 2. Since the claim of the petitioner is still pending before the second respondent, it is directed that the second respondent shall consider the claim made the petitioner by Exts.P1 and P4 and necessary orders be passed. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs