IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2011 / 28TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1564 of 2011(U) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- GEORGE,(MINOR), AGED 17 YEARS, S/O THOMAS, MANALEL HOUSE, PERAMBRA P.O, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, THOMAS T, MANALEL HOUSE, PERAMBRA P.O, THRISSUR. BY ADVS. SRI. SANTHOSH P. PODUVAL, SMT.RAJITHA.R. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THRISSUR- 680 001 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001. 3. PROGRAMME CONVENOR, KERALA STATE SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM, 2010-2011, KOTTAYAM- 686 001. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. DILEEP MOHAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P (C) No.1564 of 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 18th January, 2011 J U D G M E N T In the Thrissur District School Kalolsvam, petitioner's team participated in the item "Poorakkali". They were given second prize with A Grade. They filed an appeal and that was rejected by Ext.P1. A reading of Ext.P1 shows that the only contention raised was that the assessment of performance by the Judges was improper. This contention was appreciated and has been rejected by the appellate committee, after referring to the proceedings of the Judges. Nothing has been placed on record to conclude that the decision taken by the appellate committee is erroneous. For that reason and also for the further reason that the first prize winning team who will be affected if any order is passed in favour of the petitioner, has not been impleaded as party to this case, the petition has to be rejected. Writ petition fails and it is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma /True copy/ P.A to Judge W.P (C) No. 2010 2