IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 1069 of 2003 Date of Decision: 18.5.2011. Kaka Singh & another ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. D.R. Singla, Advocate for Mr. V.S. Rana, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ranvir S. Chauhan, DAG, Punjab, for the respondent-State. NAWAB SINGH.J (ORAL) This revision is directed against the judgment dated April 16th, 2003 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Mansa affirming the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated October 13th, 2001 of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Mansa, whereby the petitioners were convicted and sentenced as under:- Offence Sentence Fine In default 323/34 IPC RI for 3 months -- -- 325 IPC RI for 6 months Rs.300/- RI for 15 days The sentences were ordered to run concurrently. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners do not challenge the judgment of conviction and only prays for reduction of sentence. He has further submitted that in the present FIR cross cases were registered against both the sides. Both the parties received injuries at the hands of other each. They have undergone actual sentence of 1 month and 1 day. They have already faced the agony of protracted criminal proceedings spreading over a period of 16 years. They are the first offenders. They have families to support. Criminal Revision No. 1069 of 2003 (2) 3. The grounds taken justify the request made so, this Court upholds the conviction of the petitioners but is inclined to reduce the sentence. It is further of the opinion that ends of justice shall be met if the petitioners are sentenced to the period already undergone by them and orders accordingly. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 18.5.2011. SN