IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5202 of 2011 Between: B. Ramesh Goud ..... Petitioner AND Govt., of A.P., rep., by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development Department, Hyderabad & others. .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Ms. S. Nanda Counsel for respondents 1&3: AGP for Panchayat Raj Counsel for respondent No.4: Sri P. Raghavender Reddy The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5202 of 2011 ORDER: The only grievance of the petitioner in this Writ Petition is that his representations dated 07.10.2010 and 26.02.2011 are not being disposed of by respondent No.1. As the dispute raised by the petitioner arises under a lease agreement between him and respondent No.3, this Court ordinarily does not entertain such disputes by exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, as noted above, as the petitioner’s grievance is confined to non-disposal of his representations stated to be pending before respondent No.1, the Writ Petition is disposed of without going into the merits of the case with a direction to respondent No.1 to dispose of the petitioner’s representations, if received and communicate its decision within two weeks from the date of receipt of the order. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision taken by respondent No.1, he shall be free to approach the civil Court of competent jurisdiction for appropriate relief. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.6434 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 04.03.2011 ES