IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.10 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.01.2011 Ashok Garg ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that accused-father- in-law should have not been charged under Sections 313, 323 and 506 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that it seems that learned Trial Judge while framing the charge under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has not appreciated the fact in right prospective that there is no allegation against the father-in-law as far as offence under Sections 313, 323 and 506 IPC is concerned. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that a proper application under Section 216 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall be moved before the Trial Court for deletion of charges under Sections 313, 323 and 506 IPC against the father-in-law/petitioner herein. He seeks permission to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. Present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to move an application for deletion of the charges, if permissible under the law. (Alok Singh) Judge January 04, 2011 R.S.