1 S.B. Civil writ petition No. 10613/2009 Ritu Dubey & Ors. vs RPSC, Ajmer & Anr. Date of Order dated 11.12.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Kuldeep Mathur, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The respondent RPSC issued an advertisement dated 23.11.2006 inviting applications for the post of teacher (Special Education) and as per the petitioner the tentative merit list was declared on 24th April, 2007. However, according to the petitioner, the petitioner had no knowledge of that merit list and he could get information of merit list when he sought information under the Right to Information Act. It is submitted that because of the fault of the department and the RPSC only some posts lying vacant and for that the correspondence went on between the department and the RPSC. It is submitted that even last appointment was given in the year 2008 in that selection process and the petitioner is eligible and is entitled to selection and appointment under that process. It is submitted that because of fault of the respondents, the petitioner cannot be made to suffer. I considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material placed on record. It is 2 not in dispute that process of appointment was started in the year 2006, tentative seniority list was declared in the year 2007 and, thereafter, appointments were given. The process of giving appointment must be completed within reasonable period and even for giving appointments out of reserved list it is normally expected to be within one year. The respondent RPSC by letter dated 10.2.2009 also informed the concerned department that the process has already been closed by them and again it has been conveyed to the respondents by letter dated 27.4.2009. In view of the above reasons, the petitioner cannot take help of the internal correspondence between the Education Department and the RPSC to justify his inaction and to say that he did not choose to approach the court in time in spite of the fact that he was entitled to the appointment and he waited for almost more than one year if not two years from the date of declaration of merit list. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in this writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/-