FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8284 OF 2010 “ Dr. Rahul Upasrao Rohankar & others Vs. Zilla Parishad, Hingoli & others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. Ajay S. Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. S.K. Kadam, AGP for respondent Nos. 2 to 4 Mr. V.N. Upadhye, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM :- D.B. BHOSALE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 20th April, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2] By this writ petition, the petitioners are seeking direction to respondent No.1 to issue appointment order in pursuance of their selection made by the District Selection Committee, Hingoli. It appears that though the petitioners were selected, appointment letters were not issued in view of the Govt. Resolution dated 5/6/2010 ( Exhibit `D'). By this Govt. Resolution, the Government imposed ban for a period of one year in making such appointments. 3] Learned Assistant Government Pleader has placed on record another Govt. Resolution dated 29th November, 2010 and submitted that in view of this resolution, it would be open to the respondent Zilla Parishad to make appointments to Group C and D FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8284 OF 2010 “ Dr. Rahul Upasrao Rohankar & others Vs. Zilla Parishad, Hingoli & others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 posts, on the basis of the select list. 4] Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 submits that after the period of one year gets over and if the Government permits them, they will make appointments on the basis of the select list already prepared by the District Selection Committee, Hingoli. The statements made by learned AGP and learned counsel for respondent No. 1 are accepted. 5] In view of of the statements made by learned AGP and learned counsel for respondent No.1, learned counsel for petitioners does not press the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as not pressed. However, all contentions of the petitioners are kept open. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] grt/-