IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICATION NO. 9 APPLICATION NO. 9 APPLICATION NO. 9 OF 2008 OF 2008 OF 2008 Capt. Arun Sethi ... ... Applicant Vs. Ahteshan A. Sayed & Ors. ... ... Respondents Captain Arun Sethi - Applicant in person Mr. H.M. Advani for respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Mr. H.J. Thakkar a/w A.I. Girdharilal for respondent no. 6. CORAM CORAM CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. : J.H. BHATIA, J. : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 4TH FEBRUARY, 2008 : 4TH FEBRUARY, 2008 : 4TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. : : :- 1) On behalf of the respondents, it was contended that the Revision Application is not tenable under the law, in view of the proviso of Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Opportunity was given to the Applicant who appears in person to make a statement on this objection. Today, the applicant in person seeks leave to withdraw this Revision Application with liberty to file writ petition challenging the impugned order. 2) The Revision Application stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file writ petition. 2 3) The Applicant makes a statement that he will file writ petition within two weeks from today. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents makes a statement that the landlord- decree holder shall not execute the decree for two weeks. Statement is accepted. ( J.H. BHATIA, J.) J.H. BHATIA, J.) J.H. BHATIA, J.)