IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27841 of 2010 Kamlesh Paswan, son of Nandu Paswan Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/- 10.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for State. Petitioner is not named in the First Information Report but during course of investigation, his name along with co-accused Binai Paswan and some other surfaced in this case and allegedly, some looted articles were recovered from the house of the petitioner and other co-accused. Paragraph 37 of the Case Diary reveals that the seizure list was prepared but the aforesaid seizure list is not specific as to from whose possession the aforesaid recovery was made. Moreover, having similar allegation one co-accused namely Binai Paswan has already been granted privilege of bail by another Bench of this Court. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/ with two 2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati at Gaya in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 234 of 2008. Learned counsel for petitioner points out that in prayer portion of the petition “Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya has wrongly been typed in place of “Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati at Gaya”. The learned counsel for petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction within the course of the day. Ashwini/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)