IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEPT PETITION NO. 89 OF 2005 IN CHAMBR SUMMONS NO. 1799 OF 2003 IN SUIT NO. 4089 OF 1993 JAGDEEP J. TALEKAR ... PETITIONER. VS. KRISHNANATH P. NARINGEKAR AND ORS. ... RESPONDENTS. BHAVESH PARMAR FOR THE PETITIONERS. MR. B.K.RAJE FOR THE RESPONDENTS. Coram : S.K.Shah, J. Coram : S.K.Shah, J. Coram : S.K.Shah, J. Date : January 20, 2006. Date : January 20, 2006. Date : January 20, 2006. P.C. 1. The learned Counsel for the respondent seeks six months time for complying with the Order, passed by this Court. 2. The Order came to be passed on 9.12.2004. What is mentioned in the reply that he has been sending letters to the concerned Authorities for getting information. The details of these letters and how many attempts were made and on how many occasions the letters were sent and on how many times the contemnor visited the authorities etc. are not mentioned in the reply. 3. I am constraint to observed that the respondent is giving false pretexts for not complying with the Order. It is therefore directed that the Respondent shall comply with the Order within a period of four months from today. 4. With this direction, the contempt petition stands disposed of. ..... [S.K.Shah , J.] [S.K.Shah , J.] [S.K.Shah , J.]