IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.71 of 2009 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through Commissioner –cum- Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Govt. of Bihar,Patna. 2. The Commissioner –cum- Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Establishment Committee, Siwan Collectorate, through the Collector, Siwan. 4. The Collector, Siwan. 5. The District Development Commissioner, Siwan. 6. The District Welfare Officer, Siwan. 7. The District Employment Officer, Siwan. 8. The Civil Surgeon –cum- Chief Medical Officer, Siwan. 9. The District Malaria Officer, Siwan. ….. Respondents/Petitioners. . Versus 1. SAMAHARNALAYA SIWAN UMMIDBAR & ANUSEBI/ DAINIK PARISHRAMIK SANGH, ZILA SHAKHA, SIWAN AT SIWAN represented through Organisation Secretary and its member. 2. Bashishtha Harizan, S/o Algu Harizan, resident of Village – Haspur, P.O. Raghunathpur, District – Siwan , Member Samaharnalay Siwan Ummidbar Anusebi / Dainik Parishramik Sangh, Zila Sakha, Siwan at Siwan. 3. Lalan Giri, Organisation Secretary, S/o Nag Narayan Giri, resident of village – Musari, P.O. Tarwara, District – Siwan. 4. Chote Lal Yadav, Member, S/o Late Sudama Yadav, resident of village and P.O. Harihansh (Uttar Tola) P.S. Hussain Ganj, District – Siwan. ( 2 to 4 members of Samaharnalya Siwan Ummidar Anusebi/Dainik parishramik Sangh, Siwan). …. Petitioners/Opp. Parties. ----------- 04/ 14.10.2009 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the Opposite parties. Prayer for review of order dated 6.2.2007 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 11003 of 2004 has been made on behalf of the State and its authorities, specially the District Magistrate, Siwan on the ground that, inadvertently the circular contained in Memo No. 639 dated 16.3.2006 could not be - 2 - brought to the notice of the Court, as such though panel has been prepared in compliance of the direction of this Court, but since in 2006 circular some procedure has been provided for regularization of daily wagers on Class IV posts, it is required that procedure should be followed. For following that procedure, review of order is essential. The ground which has been taken in the review application is misconceived as the circular contained in Memo No. 639 dated 16.3.2006 was brought on record as Annexure – C to the counter affidavit. On consideration of entire material on record, the order was passed. It seems that the review application has been filed at the instance of Collector, Siwan just as an excuse for not complying the direction of this Court. This review application is, accordingly, dismissed. The District Magistrate, Siwan should issue appointment letters in favour of the opposite parties without delay as it has been admitted that the panel in the light of the direction of this Court has already been prepared. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)