S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5517/2004 (Kishan Lal & Ors. v/s State & Ors.) Date of Order : 09/12/2004 HON’BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA,J. Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, for the petitioner/s Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is aggrieved against the resolution of the Gram Sabha of Gram Panchayat, Milusar, by which certain “sahayogis” were selected by resolution dated 9.7.2004. The petitioner No.1 is the Ward Panch of the same Gram Panchayat, Petitioner No.2 to 4 are the resident of that village and they are, therefore, voters as per the electoral roll for election of the Gram Panchayat. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the procedure was not followed for appointing “sahayogis”. The petitioner submitted that he submitted several representations and many others have also submitted representations but no action was taken. However, learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the persons, who were aspirants for the “sahayogis” have not raised any grievance. It appears that disputed questions are involved in this writ petition and it will be appropriate for the petitioner to approach the State Government for redressal of his grievance so that factual enquiry may be taken by the State Government. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in this writ petition, therefore, the writ petition is dismissed, as indicated above. (PRAKASH TATIA)J. RM/