StNBtE BENCH f. 100 ( INTHEHIGHCOURTOFCHHAmSGARHATBILASPUR <y_ WRIT PETITION N0. OF 2006 PETITIONER: St. ^:^ ^y^^y /tys^' ..<j^?\ V ^^- ^-^>>" ^ ^v ttf s<:>- ^" RESPONDENT(S): t-'f"",\ s.^--* ;' ^^ CLE^^. ^ILAS11 01 R.K. Bhavsar, S/o-Shri Sukhdev Bhavsar, Aged About- 48 Years, Occupation- Service (Sub Engineer Posted at P.M.G.S.Y PIU, Division No.2, Kanker),R/o- C/o- Shri R.K.Thakur, 58, Bajpai Castel Minocha Colony Bilaspur (C.G.) Mungeli Road, VERSUS ^" 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through it's Secretary Department of Water Resources, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through it's Secretary Department of Rural Engineering Services, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Joint Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural Development D.K.S.BhawanRaipur(C.G.) ^-4. Executive E;gineer, P.M.G.S.Y PIU, Division No.2, Kanker ^5. Executive Engineer, Mongra Project Water Resources Division Dongargaon , Disstt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WH17 PETiriON UNDER AHTICLE 226/227 OF 7HE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF__AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS 1 CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION 1 ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE. XI-HC-78 an^r^rf^fN; (CTan^TstiKiti *TTHdl sh»ll<h 3^ •^l'iild'i), (Stfl^'is, Rlfliuy ii^i. T-s3>'7Ss ...-^...;....-..<..-r.rp^- 200 341«(!>1 4sl* (yi^l^) ?BITWflf?tT3:n^T Engineerfng sarte 3.8.2006 Mr. Vinay Pandey, counse) Mr. G.K. Beriwal, Dept respondents, on advance copy. Heard. The petitioner's case is Mongra Project Division, Watet District: Dongargarh and vide deputation to the Rural of that order, the petitioner joinet^ Engineers of Water Resources dated 10-2-2006 and the Thereafter, the pefltioner made stating therein that he do not warl his representafion is not being de<| Having heard learned the petition, the peUtioner has a| pursuance of the order dated been quashed qua the peBtioner quashed on the submission ma^ behatf of the Stete that the State the Engineers of Water Resource Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) sct Therefore, in the cireums joined in the RES Department, regarding PMGSY scheme in Resources Department should al +Klfd41-f til4dT^fei<f) tRl^K ^3l1^IT3(T^T forfriepetitioner. rty Advocate (^neral for the Sate/ |ftat he was woridng as Sub Engineer, Resources Department, Dongargaon, ^rder dated 10-2-2006 he wse sent on Serwces Department. In compliance in the RES Department. Later on, other pepartment had challenged the said order s^e has been quashed by this Court. repr^entatlon to the RES Department to continue in the RES Department, but tlded. for the parties and having perused (ready joined in the RES Department in 1P-2-20W and thereafter, that order has who fited the peUtion. That or<ter was fe by the Deputy Advocate General on has framed a new scheme for sending s|s Departonent under the Pradhan Mantri leme. ^tanc , as the petitioner has already respondents white passing the order respect of the Engineers of Water l^o consider the case of the petfttoner, as couhsel 10 tlie P.T.O. 3??^TOT?ra', »Tfl«'16,Rldltiy ^^^^.^^ 200 ^ 3TI^'?T IT3^ ('^gg^ST) sn^rw R-iitb cTsiTsn^rgam; Soma ^ v ^ ??(flWHfei'3(I^T ^- alcfng the petitionsr belongs toWater| should pass appropriate order the services of the petitioner. Til) RES Deparbnent on the post wh®t< With the directlons aforesajd Consequentiy, M.( stand disposed of. Parties are entitled for csrtif |Resources Department, ther^ore, thay with the oUier Engineers in r^pect of then, the petitioner shall continue in the ite he has alreadyjoined. I, the petitton stands dispossd of. (W.)P.N<|>.2903/2006 and I.A.N0.7152Q006 also ified copy ofthis order. <t>n?fi<fl-i Hi4tiT^;fe^<fa<^i< ^srf^iran^r SdV- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.