THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA W.P.No.17799 of 2006 25th August, 2006 Between :- Chakilam Harishanker .. Petitioner And The Municipal Corporation, Karimnager represented by its Commissioner and another .. Respondent THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA W.P.No.17799 of 2006 ORDER:- Heard both the Counsel. 2. The matter is coming up for admission today. Sri Polisetti Radhakrishna takes notice on behalf of R.1 and G.P. for Municipal Administration takes notice on behalf of R.2. 3. S r i Satyam Reddy, the learned Counsel representing the petitioner states that there is a threat of demolition of the residential house of the petitioner without issuing any notice and without giving any opportunity. Hence, appropriate directions are to be issued. However, Sri Polisetti Radhakrishna states that the apprehension of the petitioner is not well-founded since the officials of the first respondent – Corporation, in fact, till now never interfered or intervened. Be that as it may, in the light of several facts which had been averred in paras 2 to 6 of the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, this Court is of the considered opinion that the Writ Petition be disposed of with the following direction:- “The respondent not to resort any demolition activity unless and until due process of law is followed.” No order as to costs. ________________ Justice P.S.Narayana 25th August, 2006 smr