IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No. 8588 of 2005 Between: CheekatiRaghava Reddy, S/o.Pera Reddy, Water Users Association Bit-3 President Of Gandavaram, Kodavalur Mandal, Nellore District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Nellore. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kodavalur Mandal, Kodavalur, Nellore District. 3 Water Users Association Rit--3, Gandavarm, Kodavalur, Mandal, Nellore District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in abolishing Water Users Association Bit- 1 Gandavaram and amalgamating the same with water users Associations Bit-2 and Bit- 3 Gandavaram as per the draft voters list as illegal , arbitrary and unjust and in violation of the provisions of sections 13 of A.P Farmers Management of Irrigation Systems Act,1997 and the rules framed thereunder and also to declare the draft publication of voters list by tam tam on 13.4.2005 giving two days time for objections arbitrary ,unjust and illegal and in violation of Rule 4 of the Rules framed under the above said Act and consequently direct the respondents not to conduct elections for Bit-3 Water Users Association, Gandavaram village , Kodavalur Mandal, Nellore Dist, till the steps are taken to conduct elections in Bit-3 Water Users Association in accordance with the provisions of the Act and pass such other orders and further reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.VENKATA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO.8588 of 2005 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter, dated 22.07.2009, to the Registry stating that he has instructions from the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition as the matter has been compromised out of Court. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 23.07.2009 v v