THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos. 3460 AND 3773 OF 2009 Date: 13-08-2009 Between Yaramati Rama Krishna …..Petitioner Bikkina ananthaLakshmi Satyavathi Devi …..Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos. 3460 AND 3773 OF 2009 COMMON ORDER: These two revisions are filed by the plaintiff under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the correctness of order dated 17-07-2009 passed in I.A Nos. 705 and 706 of 2009 in O.S No. 65 of 2007, wherein the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada dismissed the said I.As filed by him to reopen the case and to send the suit promissory note along with the documents summoned by the respondent – defendant to the handwriting expert. It is not disputed that the suit DP note was already sent to the handwriting expert with reference to the documents summoned from the Primary Agricultural Credit Society Limited, Razole on the application filed by the respondent – defendant for comparison of the signature on the said record with the signature on the suit DP note. The petitioner – plaintiff did not object for sending the signature of the defendant summoned from the Primary Agricultural Credit Society stating that the signatures are not sufficient for the expert to give his opinion. But, later, the expert after comparison also gave his evidence as he was examined by the respondent – defendant and was also sufficiently cross-examined by the plaintiff. At that stage, filing of these applications by the petitioner – plaintiff is nothing but to secure the evidence which is favourable to him. Further, the expert’s opinion is a weak piece of evidence and the same cannot occupy the place of direct evidence in proving the documents. In view of the same, no infirmity is discernible in the orders passed by the lower Court warranting correction by exercise of supervisory jurisdiction. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. A. GOPAL REDDY, J 13-08-2009 ks