IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH MARCH 2011 / 25TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 8175 of 2011(V) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.K.ABOOBACKER, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.KOYASSAN, KOKKUR AMSOM DESOM, ALAMKODE VILLAGE, PONNANI TALUK MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.O.MUHAMED SHEMEEM SMT.NASEEHA BEEGUM P.S. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR COLLECTORATE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 676 505. 2. LOCAL MONITORING COMMITTEE REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER, AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 676 505. 3. STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION, COMMISSIONER,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001 4. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001. SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J -------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.8175 OF 2011 -------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of March 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers: i) To issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records leading to Ext.P12 and set aside the decision taken by the 2nd respondent to send the report to the District Local Level Committee instead of State Level Committee is illegal, improper and against the mandates of Statute. ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 2nd respondent to send the report to 3rd respondent, State Level Committee in prescribed Form No.2 in accordance with law. Iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents No.3 and 4 to take appropriate decision based on the report of 2nd respondent within a week considering petitioner's requirement. Iv) Grant such other relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only prayer of the petitioner is to direct the second respondent/Local Monitory Committee to W.P.(C) No. 8175/2011 - 2 - send the report directly to the third respondent/State Level Committee as the project involved is for a 'public purpose'. 3. Heard the learned Govt. Pleader as well. 4. In the above circumstances, the second respondent is directed to forward the report directly to the third respondent for further steps, to have it finalised according to the relevant provisions of law. Writ Petition is disposed of. vdv P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE