IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.3513 of 1988 Date of decision : 19.11.2010 Shri Sanatam Dharam Mahabir Dal … Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and another …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Ms.Justice Ritu Bahri Present: Mr.Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ritu Bahri, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has received payment of Rs.25,000/- towards the land which was given for town planning scheme. He has referred to letter dated 4.9.1986 (Annexure P-6) whereby demarcation of the boundary wall on Bibiwala Road along with entire boundary wall of M.S.D.Public High School, Bhatinda, has been done. Boundary wall has been installed on 4.9.1986. The petitioner contends that after order dated 4.9.1986 (Annexure P-6), a notice dated 27.1.1988 (Annexure P-8) has been issued. This notice is not maintainable in view of the fact that as per the agreement, the petitioner has agreed for exchange money of Rs.25,000/-. In terms of this agreement, he has constructed a new boundary wall. The description of the shops in Annexure P-8 belongs to the petitioner. Notice was served on respondent No.2. Notice sent to Municipal Committee, Bathinda stands dully served, as per office report. No one has chosen to appear on behalf of the Municipal Committee, Bathinda. No written statement has been filed to the petition so far. In view of the letter issued by the Municipal Committee, Bathinda dated 4.9.1986 (Annexure P-6), notice dated 27.1.1988 (Annexure P-8) is hereby quashed. No order as to costs. Petition stands disposed of. (Ritu Bahri) Judge 19.11.2010 sd