IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49722 of 2008 CHANDAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.1.2009 Heard Mr. Raj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. Mehta, A.P.P. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased and bears allegation of killing his wife in league with his other family members. It is admitted in the written report that the informant received a telephonic message from the petitioner himself that his sister was serious and he should hasten in coming to the petitioner’s house. The informant reached and found his sister dead. The contention is that as may appear from the written report, the F.I.R. was merely an act of sentiment than the real story inasmuch as the informant was hurt more by the act of the accused persons of removing ornaments from the dead body than the real act complained of. Regard being had to the fact and the contention, let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Purnea, in connection with Banmankhi P.S. case no.237/2007/G.R. No.2799/2007. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )