THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Tr.C.M.P. No.506 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner is the wife of the respondent. F.C.O.P.No.324 of 2008 is filed by the respondent in the Family Court, Nellore against the petitioner under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act (for short ‘the Act’), for restitution of conjugal rights. Transfer of the same is sought to the Family Court, Kadapa. The petitioner contends that on being deserted by the respondent, she is residing with her parents at Kadapa. The respondent opposed the application. According to him, the O.P. was filed in accordance with the relevant provisions of law, and no prejudice would be caused to the petitioner, if the O.P., is decided in the Family Court, Nellore. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent. It is no doubt true that the scope of the O.P., filed by the respondent, is very limited, and a detailed trial is not contemplated. However, if one takes into account the fact that the petitioner is residing at the house of her parents, since 2006, the request made by her cannot be said to be unreasonable. The petitioner has to travel, along with a child of tender age, all the way to Nellore. The convenience of the petitioner cannot be ignored. Hence, the Tr.C.M.P. is allowed, and the F.C.O.P.No.324 of 2008 is transferred from the Family Court, Nellore, to the Family Court, Kadapa. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.03-09-2010. KO