IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M- 5486 of 2008 Date of decision:-6.5.2008. Narender Kumar ...Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. J.S. Yadav , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Ghengas, DAG, Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner entered into an agreement with complainant for the sale of his share of land measuring 37 kanals, 19 marlas out of total land of 95 kanal 16 marlas. Vide agreement entered into between the parties on 27.12.2006 he received a sum of Rs. 14,50,000/- as earnest money. However, the true fact is that the petitioner never entered into agreement with the complainant. The facts stated in the agreement and in the complaint filed with the police are self-contradictory. In the agreement it is stated that the total sum of Rs. 19,33,000/- was paid to the petitioner whereas in the FIR it is stated that total sum of Rs. 21,26,330/- is to be recovered from the petitioner. A civil suit filed by the complainant against the petitioner was already pending when the present complaint was filed with the police. The petitioner is in custody since 15.1.2008. Without opining on the merits of the controversy, the present petition is disposed of and it is directed that pending trial the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Mahendergarh. May 6, 2008 (RAJESH BINDAL) ritu-II JUDGE