IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.235 OF 2009 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.494 OF 2006 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.136 OF 2006 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2998 OF 2005 Harishankar C. Paliwal ..Plaintiff. Vs. Shanil Builders and others. ..Defendants. And Rashmi P. Parekh and another ..Applicants. .... Mr. Bharat Mehta for the Applicants. Mr. Y.M. Chaudhari with B.K. Karle for the Plaintiff. ..... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 7th May, 2009. P.C. : Counsel appearing for the Plaintiff and counsel appearing for the Applicants state that the facts relating to the present Chamber Summons stand on the same footing as those of Chamber Summons 234 of 2009 which has been made absolute. For the reasons already indicated while disposing of the companion Chamber Summons, the present Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).