Civil Revision No. 1239 of 2009 (1) In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 1239 of 2009 (O&M) Rahshul Hassan ..... Petitioner vs Municipal Council and another ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to the order passed by the learned court below whereby the prayer of the petitioner for leading additional evidence in the form of statement of the petitioner/plaintiff had been dismissed. The suit was filed by the petitioner for permanent injunction on 18.2.2004 in which the issues were framed on 7.2.2005 and the evidence of the petitioner/plaintiff was completed on 25.1.2008. Thereafter, even the evidence of the defendants/respondents had also been completed on 8.9.2008. The case was fixed for rebuttal and arguments when the application for leading additional evidence was filed on the ground that inadvertently the petitioner/plaintiff could not examine himself as a witness in support of the claim made in the plaint. The application having been rejected, the petitioner is before this court. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that it was due to inadvertent error that the petitioner could not examine himself and on that lapse he may suffer prejudice. After considering the stage of the trial and that it is evidence in the form of oral evidence of the petitioner/plaintiff which is sought to be recorded at the fag end when the evidence of the petitioner/plaintiff and the respondents/defendants is complete, I do not find any reason to grant any further opportunity to lead additional evidence at this stage. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. 5.3.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge