IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 300 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 24, 2011 Jagdev Singh …Petitioner Versus Galley Financiers and Property Consultants Pvt. Ltd and another. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Navdeep Monga, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Jaspreet Singh, A.A.G., Punjab, for respondent No.2. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that matter has been amicably settled between the parties and as per the settlement, accused-revisionist has to pay Rs.2,90,000/-, out of which Rs.2,50,000/- are paid today in the Court to respondent No.1-complainant Mr. Ramesh CRR No.300 of 2011 Kashyap, who has been identified by Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.1. Rest of the amount i.e. Rs. 40,000/- shall be paid within 90 days from today. Respondent No.1, as well as, Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned counsel made statement that present petition may be allowed treating that offence has been compounded. Considering that matter has been settled by the parties and Rs.2,50,000/- have been paid today in the Court personally to respondent No.1 – Mr. Ramesh Kashyap, offence is permitted to be compounded, conviction order passed by Courts below stand set aside. February 24, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2