IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.804 of 2010 ====================================================== Dr. Ram Ashish Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Dr. Raj Deo Singh & Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== 7 13-10-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also Mr. Harendra Kumar Tiwary appearing on behalf of the Opposite Party-University. It is not in dispute that pursuant to the order of this court, the admissible payments were made. However, Mr. Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner points out that in the show cause in one of the annexures, the difference of salary for the period 01.01.1996 to 09.08,96 was shown to have been paid to the petitioner to the tune of Rs. 90,000/- although petitioner was paid on that head to the tune of Rs. 65,000/- only. Mr. Tiwary, learned counsel for the University submits that if that mistake is there, the same would be corrected. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after passing the order, the pay scale of the petitioner as also other employees have been revised and as such, with effect from the date of revision, the pensionary benefits also needs to be revised. Mr. Tiwary, learned counsel for the University submits that with respect to the revision of the pensionary benefits as per admissible to the concerned employee are under process and the same would be paid on calculation of the same. Considering the submission of the parties and the show cause, I am not inclined to proceed with the matter and the same stands disposed of. However, it goes without saying that if any discrepancy is pointed out by the petitioner for payment, the same shall be considered and upon consideration if any amount is found payable, the same may be paid to the petitioner. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)