IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2008 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 37836 of 2007(D) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- K.PAVITHRAN, HEADMASTER, M.A.M.L.P. SCHOOL, VELLAKKAD, P.O.KARIPPAL, KANNUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.MADHUSOODANAN, ADV. SRI.T.V.JAYAKUMAR NAMBOODIRI. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KANNUR. 3. ASST.EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, TALIPARAMBA NORTH, KANNUR DISTRICT. R1 TO R3 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. RAVIKRISHNAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/12/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.37836/2007-D: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 24/05/86 OF AEO. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DTD. 05/09/89 WITH THE ENDORSEMENT OF AEO. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE ORDER OF HONOURABLE HIGH COURT IN O.P. NO. 4250/95. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 04/05/1999 AS G.O. (P)127/99/G. EDN. ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DTD. 26/04/2007 BEFORE THE R.2. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 31/07/2007. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 22/08/2007 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.1. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.37836/2007 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT Ext.P6 order passed by the 2nd respondent, declining the claim of the petitioner for salary of the Headmaster for the period from 5.12.1985 is under challenge. Admittedly, Ext.P6 is an order which is revisable in terms of the provisions contained in Rule 92 of Chapter XIV-A KER. Therefore, it is for the petitioner to pursue that statutory remedy and for that reason I do not think that the writ petition should be allowed. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that if the petitioner files a revision against Ext.P6 within 2 weeks, that shall be entertained by the first respondent on merits and orders thereon shall be passed within 3 months thereafter with notice to the petitioner. ANTONY DOMINIC vi JUDGE 2