1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2398 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 12.08.2011 Gurjinder Singh Sethi ....Petitioner Versus Yadvinder Singh ....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** Present: Mr. Rahul Rampal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S.Saini, Advocate for the respondent. * * * RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL) After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all legal objections before the Rent Controller in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the respondent-landlord has brought to the notice of this Court that the eviction petition has been filed under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 and is pending since the year 2007. However, on the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted before this Court that now the case is fixed for arguments on the application for grant of leave to defend. 2 Civil Revision No.2398 of 2011 (O&M) In view of the aforesaid stand taken by the parties, the Rent Controller is directed to dispose of the said application in accordance with law on the date fixed or within one month thereafter. With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is ordered to be dismissed. Disposed of. 12.08.2011 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) savita Judge