1 Farad Continuation Sheet No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI.APPLICATION NO.128 OF 2009 (PAVANKUMAR JAGDISHPRASAD BACHUKA & 5 OTH. Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR.PSO KOTWALI, AKOLA) ________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Shri Anil S. Mardikar, Advocate for Applicant. Shri D.B.Patel, A.P.P. for respondent. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : JANUARY 19, 2008. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The applicants, who had been granted interim anticipatory bail, were directed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge to remain present at the time of final hearing and passing of order on their application. The applicants are apprehensive that if they remain present at the time of final hearing and order, 2 they may be taken in custody. First such apprehension is in the minds of the applicants and it is for the applicants to reconcile what passes in their minds. In any case, since the interim order has been passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in favour of the applicants, the same shall remain in force for two High Court working days, should the learned Additional Sessions Judge proceed to pass an adverse order. Application disposed of. JUDGE RR.