THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.4416 of 2011 Dated: 01.07.2011 Between: Mohd. Parvez Ahmed and another …..Petitioners And The State of A.P., through Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another …..Respondents THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.4416 of 2011 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and also learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 2. Petitioners are accused 2 and 3 in Crime No.57 of 2011 of II Town Police Station, Nizamabad. The offences alleged are those punishable under Sections 468, 471, 420, 448 and 506 read with Section 34 I.P.C. They filed this petition to quash the proceedings in the said case. 3. The version of the 2nd respondent herein who is the de facto complainant is that earlier he purchased the house property in question from one D.Narsimha Chary through a registered agreement of sale- cum-G.P.A. dated 25.2.2009 and got possession of it also. His further version is that subsequently the petitioners herein and the said D.Narsimha Chary brought into existence an unregistered mortgage deed showing as if the property was earlier mortgaged by the D.Narsimha Chary in favour of Syed Wajid Ali. It may be noted that there is a registered document in favour of the de facto complainant and whereas the document in question is an unregistered mortgage deed drafted on a Rs.10/- stamp paper for a loan amount of Rs.9,00,000/-. The matter is still at the stage of investigation. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners relied upon a status quo order obtained by the petitioners in an injunction suit filed against two of the sons of aforesaid D.Narsimha Chary and another G.Vignesh. The status quo order does not mean that the petitioners are in possession of the house and that is to be clarified. Having regard to the fact that the document said to have forged in question is an unregistered mortgage deed and the matter is pending investigation, I am of the opinion that the investigation should go on and this court cannot interfere in the matter. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed at the admission stage. ___________________________ JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR 1st July, 2011 Tjmr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.4416 of 2011 DATE: 01.07.2011