HIGH COUR'I OF CHHAI‘ lisGARl-I AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No 3902 ot 2008 PE'rmONER : RSRathore 5/0 Late Sim HPRathore, aged abcut 48 years, R/o Janpad Panchayat, Darbha, Dlsmct Bastar (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chl1amsgam Through. Secretary, t ‘ Panchayat & Gramm Vikas V‘bhag, DKS ‘ . ' Bhawan, Rmpur, Dlstnct Rmpux (CG) 2. ‘ Development Commissgoner Panchayat & Gramm \ iv Vikas V1bhag, Ra1pur, Dismct Raipur (CG) . Chlef Engineer, Rum} Engmeermg Semcesy V Panchayat & Gramm Vlkas V1bhag; Rmpur, L Distuct Rmpur (C.G ) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARFICLE 226 OF T HE CON SI'ITUTION OF INDIA SB. Hon’ble Shri Sansh K. ihotu Presen. bhn Vlkram Dmt Advocate for the petmone t r Ms Sumta Jam, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents ORAL ORDER (Passed on 23m day of July, 2608) ‘ Learned counsel appeanng for the petmoner subnnts that pursuant to the libertv granted by thls Coun on 13 ll 2007 m W P (S) No 6478/2007 (RS Rathore v State of Lhhattisgarh & Others), the petmoner mw several representations mcludmg representatum dated 24 12 2007 (Annexure P/9) The sald representatlons have not been decided as yet The petmoner submns that the respondent author-mes mgy bednected to consider his representations and decide the same in" accordancewith 1aw, Within a stipulated time. 2. beamed counsel appearmg for the State/respondents subrmts that If there 1s anv representatwn pendmg before the authormes concerned the same should be declded 1n accordance wrm law 3. In vrew of the above, thts petmon 1s dmposed of wnh a directlon to the authonues concerned to consrder and declde the pending represernauon ' dated 24 12 2007 (Annexure P/9) on Its own ments 1n accordance With law as early as possrble preferably Wtthm a penod of live weeks No order asto costs. . 5d]- : Satish K. Agnihotri . r Judge l l £;r. " 2r ‘ Agn, J