1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. O R D E R Legal representatives of Thakar Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3741/2007 Date of Order : : 12/08/2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr.N.L.Joshi, for the petitioner. Mr.O.P.Boob, Dy.Govt.Counsel for the respondent-State Mr.V.K.Aggarwal, for the respondent No.2 BY THE COURT: By the instant writ petition under Articles 227 of the Constitution of India, the orders Annexure-6 dated 19.4.2004 and Annexure-7 dated 8.5.2007 passed by the respondents Revenue Appellate Authority, Sri Ganganagar and the Board of Revenue, Ajmer respectively have been challenged by the petitioner. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Carefully gone through the orders impugned passed by both 2 the courts below. It appears that during pendency of the suit in respect of the land, which is recorded in the name of the temple, while deciding an application under Section 212 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, the petitioner was allowed to be in possession of the land on payment of a sum of Rs.25,000/- per annum by the respondent Revenue Appellate Authority. On a revision, the respondent Board of Revenue did not find any error in the order impugned. Both the courts below have concurrently ordered the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- per annum for use and occupation of the land, which is recorded in the record of right in the name of temple which is otherwise not transferable as deity therein being perpetual minor. In my view, no case for interference by invoking extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 227 of the Constitution of India is made out. The writ petition lacks merit and it is, therefore, dismissed. The interim order dated 7.8.2007 stands vacated. Stay petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs. (H.R. PANWAR), J. NK