IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 895 of 2008 Prem Singh Saini S/o Shri Satya Pal Singh …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …… Respondents Mr. Pramod Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Pramod Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for the State. 2. Learned A.G.A. for the State submits before this Court that it has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit that the police has completed the investigation and after completion of investigation the police has found that there is no prima-facie case against the petitioner. It was further submitted that the present petitioner has not been charesheeted by the police. It was further submitted that in view of above the writ petition filed by petitioner seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him has, now, become infructuous. As such, the police is likely to submit the final report before the competent court in the near future. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 20.02.2009 LSR