-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1260 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1260 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1260 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.457 OF 1999 APPEAL NO.457 OF 1999 APPEAL NO.457 OF 1999 Indira K. Juriyani and others ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra and another ...Respondents Mr.S.V.Kotwal for the Applicant Mr.S.R.Shinde, A.P.P. for State Ms P.H.Kantharia for C.B.I. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : DECEMBER 6,2006. : DECEMBER 6,2006. : DECEMBER 6,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the second Respondent. Notice of this Application is given to the C.B.I. A.C.B., Mumbai. The sole Appellant has expired. The conviction of the Appellant was for offences under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The learned Trial Judge has passed an order of confiscation of the property allegedly held by the Appellant. In view of this position, the Applicants who are the legal representatives of the Appellant desire to prosecute the Appeal. By this Application the Applicants are also seeking leave to make a formal amendment in the cause title of the Appeal for adding the State of Maharashtra as a party Respondent. 2. In my view, the Application deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, Application is allowed in terms of the prayer clauses (A) and (B). Amendment to be carried out within a period of three weeks from today. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE