IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7641 of 2008 1. BINAY KUMAR THAKUR, SON OF SRI HEMRAJ THAKUR. 2. ARBIND KUMAR OJHA, SON OF SRI JANARDAN OJHA. 3. LAKHENDRA PRASAD THAKUR, SON OF SRI SARYUG THAKUR. 4. SATYENDRA RAM, SON OF SRI JAI MANGAL RAM. ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE AND POST OFFICE BAKATPUR, POLICE STATION-KANTI, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. ………………………………………………..PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, TIRHUT DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR. 4. THE COLLECTOR, MUZAFFARPUR. 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION SUPERINTENDENT, MUZAFFARPUR. 6. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MUZAFFARPUR (WEST) SADAR, MUZAFFARPUR. 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KANTI, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. 8. THE MUKHIA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BAKATPUR, P.O. BAKATPUR, P.S. KANTI, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. 9. THE PANCHAYAT SACHIV, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, BAKATPUR, P.O. BAKATPUR, P.S. KANTI, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. …………………………………………..RESPONDENTS. ----------- For the Petitioners : M/s. Rajiv Nayan Singh and Prakash Shekhar Kumar, Advocates. 2 For the State : Mr. Sanjay Prasad, AC to AAG-X. For the Intervenors : Mr. Sunil Kr. Singh, Advocate. ---------- 2. 4.3.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioners appears and seeks permission to withdraw this writ application to file an appeal before the appellate authority constituted under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Parambhik Shikshak (Niyojan Avam Seva Sart) Niyamavali, 2006 (as amended by Amendment Rules, 2008) as under the said forum alternative remedy is available to him. Permission is accorded. This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted to the petitioners. If the petitioners prefer such appeal before the appellate authority within a period of eight weeks from today, the same should be considered and decided by the appellate authority within a period prescribed under the Rules. It is made clear that this Court has not formed any opinion with regard to the merit of the case of the petitioner. P.S. ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)