IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2010 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 983 of 2010 PETITIONER : ACCUSED: ------------------------------ P.C.THOMAS,PUTHENPURACKAL HOUSE VECHOOCHIRA BHAGOM, CHETHAKKAL VILLAGE,RANNY TALUK BY ADV. SRI.T.P.PRADEEP RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VECHOOCHIRA. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE PATHANAMTHITTA. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.SALIM P.A. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------ B.A. NO. 983 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of March, 2010 O R D E R When the Bail Application came up for hearing on 2.3.2010, the following order was passed: “Apprehending arrest on an accusation of having committed non bailable offence, the petitioner has filed this application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner apprehends that he may be arrested by Vechoochira Police on a petition filed by some of the customers of the Valutundiyil Finance. It is stated that the petitioner was the Manager of Valutundiyil Finance. It is also stated that the Managing Director of the Valutundiyil Finance left the place closing the firm and cheating the investors. It would appear that the investors had filed petition before the police. The police directed the petitioner to appear. He did not appear. 2. It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that no case is registered against the petitioner and that the police has no intention to arrest the petitioner as of now. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is prepared to B.A. NO. 983 OF 2010 :: 2 :: appear before the S.I. of Police, Vechoochira Police Station on 8th and 9th March, 2010. Post on 16.3.2010. It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that the petitioner will not be arrested in connection with the case till then.” 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor that the direction in the order dated 2.3.2010 has been complied with by the petitioner. The submission made by the learned Public Prosecutor that no case is registered against the petitioner and that the police have no intention to arrest the petitioner is recorded and the Bail Application is closed. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/