<f .yi^i"^ —f7->' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR D.B: APPELLANT Hon'ble Shri Sunil Kiunar Sinha, Hon'bleShri Prashant Kumar Mishra, JJ. Writ Appeal (PR) No. 2668 of 2011 ^ ^ '^ Ghanshyam Vrajlal Sonchhatra aged about 54 years, S/o Vrajlal Bhai, Sonchhatra R/o Vasundhara, Sonchhatra Compound, High Court, Road, Near Ravindra Nath Tagore Square, Bilaspur Vs. RESPONDENTS 4. The StateofChhattisgarh, through its Secretary Commercial Tax Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest Produce (T & D), through its Managing Director, Cooperative Federation Ltd. A-25, VIP Club Khamrdih, ShankerNagar, Raipur Commissioner Commercial Tax, Vanijyik Kar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur C.G. Rajya Minor Forest Produce Cooperative Union Matyadit, Through its Managing Director, Circle Raipur Appearance: Mr. Yogesh Chandra, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. A.S. Kachwaha, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents. WMT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 OyOF THE HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH <APPEAL TO DIVTSION BENCH) ACL -2 ORAL ORDER (06.05.2011) Following oral order of the Court was passed by SunU Kumar Smha. J. The matter is listed in default. The default is formal as some pages in the documents in paper book are faint. We have gone through those pages and we are satisfied that there is no necessity of filing extra copies of those pages as they are legible. Accordingly, the default stands removed. Office is directed to register writ appeal. Heard on I.A. No. 02/201 1, an application for exemption from filing the certified copy ofthe order dated 01/10/2010. On due consideration, I.A. No. 02/2011 is allowed and the appellant is exempted from filing the certified copy of the above order. Heard on I.A. No. 01/2011, an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. On due consideration of the submissions made by leamed counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the appellant has shown sufEcient cause for not filing the appeal in time and the delay in filing the appeal deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, I.A. No. 01/2011 is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. Leamed counsel for the parties are also heard on admission. This appeal is directed against a common order dated 01/10/2010 passed in a batch of writ petitions. Against the said common order, Wany vmt appeals including W.A. No.452/2010, were filed, It is stated at bar that all the writ appeals filed against the common order have been dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court by a common judgment dated 19 ofApril, 2011. i ii^if j Jiif ^tlii!"' .A: 3 Leamed counsel for the appellant submits that this appeal may also be dismissed/disposed of in tenns of the above common judgment dated 19th ofApril, 2011 passed in W.A. No. 452/2010 and other connected writ appeals. In view of the above, the present Writ Appeal is dismissed in terms ofthe common judgment dated 19 ofApril, 2011 passed in above bateh ofwrit appeals. Certified copy as per mles. Sd/- s"n'IKuinarSinha ' Judge prasbant^umarMtetaa Judge