IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE. SIDE. SIDE. WRIT PETITION NO. 3346 OF 2006. Uday M. Tamboskar ... Petitioner. V/s. Apurva U. Tamboskar ... Respondent. Mrs. Manjula Rao for the petitioner. Shri R.R. Salvi for the respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 13.9.2006. : 13.9.2006. : 13.9.2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Perused petition. 2. During the course of hearing learned Counsel for the petitioner asserts that income-tax returns of the respondent were shown to the Family Court, however, they were not filed on record. It appears that they have not even been considered while passing impugned order. However, Counsel appearing for the respondent disputes this assertion. 3. Having heard parties, without going into merits and/or demerits of the submissions made, at the request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner,she is allowed to withdraw this petition with liberty to file review petition before the Family Court, within two weeks from today. In the event of such review petition, it would be open for the Family Court to consider the same on its own merits and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 8 weeks from the date of receipt of this order. All rival contentions are kept. . Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)