IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1712 of 2010 Narendra Shahi, S/O Late Tapeshwar Shahi, resident of village Harka Manashi, P.S. Minapur, District- Muzaffarpur ………… Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar ………….. Opp.Party ----------- 3. 26/02/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under section 406 read with 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is alleged to be member of a fake company which has collected deposits from the informant and others to the tune of Rs.1,96,000/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner shows two orders of learned court below from which it appears that this Court had directed the concerned accused to deposit an amount of Rs.20,000/- each in term deposit and upon their so depositing, they were allowed to be released on bail. Considering the above condition imposed by this Court in allowing bail to the other co- accused, as appearing from order dated 19.9.2006 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Muzaffarpur in Complaint Case No.3102 of 2004, this application is allowed. Petitioner is directed to deposit Rs.20,000/- in the same - 2 - manner in the court below and upon his so depositing, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri A.B.Shrivastava, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Muzaffarpur in Complaint Case No.3102 of 2004 (Trial No.841 of 2005) with conditions as laid down in Sub- Section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)