IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CR.APPLN/5000/2010 WAHED RAHIMU PARSUWALE AND ORS V/S STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Shri Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for applicants and Shri V.H.Dighe, APP for respondents. ... CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL,J. Dated : January 10, 2011 PER COURT : - 1. Heard respective counsel. 2. In a previous clash between the accused/applicants with the complainant, accused/applicants warned the complainant not to cause encroachment on the agricultural field - Gayran. In order to avoid the accusation of the accused/applicants an overt act is branded against the present accused/ applicants. Going by the first information report (Page 10) it is explicit that hurling to the complainant is specifically attributed to the accused/applicant Mariyam. Custodial interrogation of the accused not expected, since no overt act to outcast feelings of complainant are emerging. 3. Considering the allegations and sweeping allegations, custodial interrogation of other accused No.6 Mariyam Chotelal Tundiwale is not warranted. Hence the order. 4. In the event of arrest of accused/applicants Wahed Rahimu Parsuwale, Ismail Wahed Parsuwale, Chhotelal Keshu Tundiwale, Muglal Chhotelal Tundiwale, CR.APPLN/5000/2010 (2) Imam Buddhu Paruwale, Chhotibi Chhotelal Tundiwale and Sk.Husen Sk. Azeemoddin in Crime No.342 of 2010 registered with Taluka Police Station, Jalna, they be released on furnishing PR bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rs.Fifteen Thousand only/-) with one surety of like amount each. The accused/applicants shall attend the concerned Investigator on every alternate Sunday between 4 to 8 pm till filing of the charge sheet. The accused/applicants shall not influence the prosecution witnesses. 5. Application to the extent of applicant No.6 - Mariyam Chhotelal Tundiwale is rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) ... akl