miT'in ! •!'I!;'dflS3E-'i3m' K :iC:;-,">..%^ l^ I •a.:.;-1''' '^ B !'fe>." ^sf^ s^s ^ "ff' ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DJVISIONBENCH Coram : HON'BLE SHRi RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRJ SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. APPLIGANTS .C.C. No. 193 of 2Q06 (S.B.) 1. Shyam Lal, Aged abput 55 years, S/o Shiv Shankar Pandey, 2. Mahendra Kumar, Aged about 32 years (wrongly written as 52 years) S/o Shyam Lal 3. Shailendra Kumar, Aged about 26 years, S/'o Shyam Lai All R/o Beltikari, P.S. & Tahsil - Bilaigarh, Dist: Raipur (C.G.) (Contemnor] T.P. Ratre, S.D.M. Bitaigarh, Tahsi Bilaigarh, Distt: Raipur - (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR REVIVAL OF CONTEMPT PETrTION Present: Shrl H.V. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners. ORDER (22nd October, 2008) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: Learned counsel for the petitioner is heard on IV1.C.P. No.661/2006, a petition for condonation of delay in filing the appeai. 2. On due consideration, M.C.P. No.661/2006, is aiiowed and the delay in fiiing the restoration petition is hereby condoned. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners is heard on the restoration v ;vtf <i 5. The petitioners are seeking restoration bf Contempt Petition No. 9/2003; which was dismsssed for want of prosecution vide order dated 17.02.2006. 6. On due consideration of the submissfons of learned counsel for the petitioners and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, we are satisfied that the absence of the petitioners' counsel on 17.02.2006 when Contempt Petition No.09/2003 was taken up for hearing, was based on bona fide grounds. 7. M.C.C. No.193/2006, therefore, is a!lo<yed and Contempt Petition No.09/2003 is restored to its oriainal number. A Sd/- Chief Justice ISfc-3 Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge padma