IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18045 of 2011 ALOK KUMAR PRIYADARHSI @ SUDHIR KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 13.6.2011 Heard. Prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is in Complaint Case no. 1716 of 2007. The fundamental ground on which the prayer has been made is that after having lived in the matrimonial house, the complainant deserted the petitioner forcing him to file a petition seeking the restitution of conjugal rights of the petitioner as against the complainant. However, it appears from the order passed in Matrimonial Suit no. 82 of 2009 by the Family court, Khagaria that the petitioner withdrew the petition seeking the restitution of his conjugal rights as he had good reasons to find that the lady had ultimately deserted him and that necessitated the filing of full- fledged petition seeking a decree dissolving the marriage of the petitioner. Matrimonial Suit no. 82 of 2009 was allowed to be withdrawn and, as such, dismissed the suit and, therefore, the petitioner desired to file a petition seeking dissolution of marriage. It is not that the petitioner has now filed Divorce case no. 88 of 2010 in the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Khagaria seeking the decree of dissolution of marriage. Considering the allegation and the background as set down by the litigation before the Principal Judge, Family Court, 2 Khagaria, let petitioner Alok Kumar Priyadarshi alias Sudhir Kumar Singh either in the event of arrest by the police or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Muzaffarpur in Complaint Case no. 1716 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down in section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)