HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6485 of 2011 Date: 29.03.2011 Between : Muppala Jagadeswara Rao. …….Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department & others. ….Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6485 of 2011 ORDER : In this writ petition, it is the grievance of the petitioner that the 2nd respondent is interfering with the civil disputes existing between him and respondents 3 and 4. Based on the written instructions sent by the Station House Officer of Bhadrachalam Rural Police Station in Khammam District, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4 are brothers and their father had lodged a complaint on 09.04.2007 against the petitioner herein, stating that on the aforesaid date, petitioner has criminally trespassed into the house site and abused him in filthy language by threatening him with dire consequences. Based on such complaint, a case is registered in Crime No.31 of 2010 for the offences under Sections 447, 294(b) and 506 of IPC on 09.04.2010 and the petitioner/accused was arrested and after completion of investigation, final report was also filed and the case is pending trial in C.C.No.459 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Bhadrachalam. With regard to the allegation of the petitioner that he was being threatened, it is submitted that respondents have never threatened the petitioner and never insisted him to compromise the civil dispute. It is stated that they have only investigated into Crime No.31 of 2010. When there is investigation in Crime No.31 of 2010, the same cannot be termed as interference with the life and liberty of the petitioner. As the 2nd respondent has denied the allegation of threatening the petitioner and as it is also stated that they never insisted to compromise the matter between petitioner and respondents 3 and 4, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, placing such statement on record. Subject to above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 29th March 2011 ajr