IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2010 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1932 RP.No. 901 of 2010(H) --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.17074/2010 Dated 15/06/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER: 2ND RESPONDENT --------------------------------------------- KOTTARAKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH,REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,KOTTARAKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, PULAMON PO,KOTTARAKKARA,KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF RESPONDENTS: PETITIONERS & RESPONDENTS 1,3,4 AND 5 -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ANILKUMAR,S/O.KARUNAKARAN,SREEVILASAM, AMBALAKAKARA HOUSE,KIZHAKKEKARA, KOTTARAKKARA,KOLLAM 691531. 2. BAIJU.K, SREE VILASOM,AMBALAKKARA BUNGLOW,TRIKKANNAMANGAL,KOTTARAKKARA,KOLLAM 691531 3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR,KOLLAM 691531. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,KOTTARAKKARA VILLAGE,KOTTARAKKARA 691 531. 5. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS,KOLLAM 691 531. 6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY, KOLLAM 691 531. ADV. SRI.M.C.SEN, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R1,2 SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS FOR R1,2 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- Review Petition No.901 OF 2010 in W.P.(C)No.17074 Of 2010 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 28th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2010 O R D E R This Review Petition is filed by the 2nd respondent seeking for a review of the interim order passed in I.A.No.6964/2010. It is pointed out in the Review Petition in Ground A that the review petitioner herein namely the Panchayat has not instructed the counsel to make any representation before this Court nor submit any statement, which is referred to in the interim order. 2. There is no apparent error in the order passed by me, since that was passed in the light of the submission made at the time of hearing and based on the statement filed. Therefore, the remedy of the review petitioner is only to file an appropriate application seeking vacation of the interim order. Leaving open the said remedy, the Review Petition is dismissed. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. dsn