THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.NO.3920 OF 2009 ORDER This civil revision petition is directed against an order dated 3.8.2009 passed in I.A.No.294 of 2009 in O.S.No.206 of 2002 by the XIII Additional Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad. Revision petitioners herein are the plaintiffs and respondents herein are the defendants. Plaintiffs filed suit in O.S.No.206 of 2002 for cancellation of decree dated 13.12.1996 and for perpetual injunction. The defendants filed written statement on 12.12.2002 denying the sale deed of plaintiffs dated 14.8.1957 and title thereon. When the chief affidavit of DW1 was filed on 27.1.2009, the plaintiffs came up with the present petition seeking amendment of prayer as DW1 denied the genuineness of sale deed on 29.1.2009. At the first instance, the plaintiffs have not sought for the relief of declaration. Even after filing of the written statement, they did not choose to file petition-seeking amendment of plaint. When the matter reached for trial and evidence is going on, they came up with the present petition seeking amendment. There are no bona fides on the part of the plaintiffs as they have kept quite for all these seven years. Apart from that Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963 deals with other declarations i.e., other than the declaration and for possession under Article 58, the period of limitation is three years. Hence, the plaintiffs are not entitled for the relief as sought for in the petition. There is no illegality or irregularity in the order impugned and the findings arrived at by the learned Judge needs no interference. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed. __________ 28-08-2009 rkk