IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17548 of 2010 MITHILESH PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 21.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected thrice i.e., 26.4.2007, 21.5.2008 and 21.5.2009. Learned counsel submits that prior to May, 2005 five petitioners were examined. He submits that neither the Investigating Officer nor the Doctor has been examined despite repeated summons to them. It is submitted that petitioner is in custody for more than four years and three months. He submits that the identification is a doubtful identification. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not persuaded to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, if the trial does not conclude within a period of three months, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. Let a copy of this order be communicated through FAX at the cost of the petitioner to the 2 Court of Additional Sessions Judge cum F.T.C. No. 2, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Sessions Trial No. 600/2006 arising out of Chandi P.S. Case No. 301/2004. Anand Kr. (S. P. Singh, J.)