IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.M.P.(M) No. 1141 of 2010. Decided on November 9, 2010. Krishan Ram …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & another ..Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner Sh. Vikas Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondent Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Asstt. AG. Surjit Singh, Judge (Oral) Petitioner is involved in a scam of bogus examinations of Class 8th, 10+1 and 10+2. As per police report, there are few Tuition Centres, which, behind the facade of providing tuitions, arrange for bogus examination of private candidates, for the aforesaid classes and on the basis of those bogus examinations, candidates are declared pass. Money is charged for arranging bogus examination and procuring certificates of passing those examinations from H.P. Board of School Education. Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - 2. Petitioner has approached this Court for grant of anticipatory bail. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, as also learned Assistant Advocate General and gone through the police report and record. 4. Role, attributed to the petitioner, is that he conducted spot evaluation of an examination centre for private candidates at Bilaspur and also supplied examination application forms to at least two candidates. Petitioner has also been booked in all the three cases. In two cases, he has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court, which fact is not denied by the learned Assistant Advocate General. 5. Alleged involvement of the petitioner in all the three cases is similar. So, in this case also, he is granted anticipatory bail and it is ordered that in the event of his formal arrest, he shall be released on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of `20,000/- with one surety in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the arresting police officer. The order is subject to the conditions that the petitioner shall join investigation, as when and where called upon to do so, he shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence, and shall not try to overawe or influence the witnesses. Copy dasti. November 9, 2010 (PC). (Surjit Singh) Judge.