IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20408 of 2006 Between: Khaja Chinaiah, S/o. Kotaiah, R/o. Renta Chinthala Village and Mandal, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District (CS) Collector, Guntur, Guntur District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Narsaraopet, Guntur, Guntur District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Rentachintala Mandal, Guntur, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.D.Y.L.N.CHARY Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies The Court made the following Order: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal as the issue involved in the writ petition is very short. In this writ petition the petitioner questioned the order dated 21.10.2005 of respondent No.3 whereby he kept Smt. D. Yesamma, Fair Price Shop dealer of Rentachintala Village in-charge of the petitioner’s authorization. A perusal of the said order shows that the same was passed on the basis of order dated 20.10.2005 by which respondent No.2 suspended the petitioner’s authorization on certain allegations. The petitioner has not questioned the said order of respondent No.2. Be that as it may as the impugned action pertains to suspension pending enquiry and the said order has not been stayed in this writ petition, nothing is left in this writ petition for adjudication on merits. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 to pass a final order, if not already done. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.25820 of 2006 filed by the writ petition for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 26th June, 2009 GHN