IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11023 of 2009 SHASHI BHUSHAN TIWARY S/O JHULAN TIWARY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DUMARSAN BANGARA, P.S. MASARAKH, DISTRICT SARAN AT PRESENT VILLAGE BHATKESHAR, P.S. JALALPUR, DISTRICT SARAN …. PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. NARBDESHAR MISHRA S/O SHEOJATAN MISHRA 3. PREM PRATAP MISHRA S/O NARBADESHAR MISHRA, BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SAMHOTA, P.S. KOPA, DISTRICT SARAN 4. ASHA DEVI W/O SRI NIWASH PANDEY 5. SRI NIWASH PANDEY S/O MAHESHWAR PANDEY 6. PUSHPANJALI DEVI W/O BRAJESH KUMAR PANDEY 7. BRAJESH KUMAR PANDEY S/O MAHESHWAR PANDEY 8. REKHA PANDEY W/O RAJESH PANDEY 9. RAJESH PANDEY S/O MAHESHWAR PANDEY, ALL 4 TO 9 RESIDENT OF VILLAGE, P.S. JALALPUR, DISTT. SARAN 10. MAHESHWAR PANDEY S/O LATE BASUDEO PANDEY 11. BISHESHWAR RAI W/O ANUP RAI, BOTH 10 AND 11 RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHATKESHARI, P.S. JALALPUR, DISTT. SARAN 12. RAM BILASH DUBEY S/O R/O VILLAGE, P.S. KOPA, DISTT. SARAN ….. OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 22.9.2010 The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 4.4.2008 passed by the S.D.J.M., Chapra in Trial No.368 of 2008, by which he has refused to mark some documents as exhibit. The petitioner claims that the case of the prosecution shall be grossly prejudiced if the same is not allowed. In view of such, the application is allowed and the S.D.J.M., Chapra is directed to allow the documents of the prosecution to be marked as exhibits in Trial No.368 of 2008. However, it is made clear that no - 2 - unnecessary dates shall be given to either of the parties for protracting the trial any further. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )