IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 31ST AUGUST 2010 / 9TH BHADRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 4960 of 2010() ------------------------------------------ CMP.NO.3392/2010 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE,MAVELIKKARA ..... (CRIME NO.244/2010 OF KURATHIKADU POLICE STATION) PETITIONER/3RD ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------ APPUNNI, S/O.VIJAYAN, KALATHIL VEEDU, DESHATHINAKAM MURI, KRISHNAPURAM VILLAGE. BY ADVS. SRI.A.R.DILEEP, SRI.SUNILKUMAR V., SRI.JAWAHAR.H. RESPONDENT(S): STATE AND COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBILC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAVELIKKARA POLICE STATION. R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SEI. M.S.BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No. 4960 of 2010 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 31st day of August, 2010 ORDER Petitioner, who is the 3rd accused in Crime No.244/2010 of Kurathikadu Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 449, 323, 341, 324, 506(II), 307 and 302 read with 34 IPC, seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 15.6.2010. The petitioner was arrested on 20.6.2010. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) dmb