THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 20426 of 2009 Oral order: The petitioner states that in spite of orders dated 18.04.2002, passed by this Court in W.P. No. 2802 of 2002 filed by M/s. Madina Education and Welfare Society, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation filed by them requesting to widen the road as per the Zoning Regulations, the respondents have not taken any steps to widen the road at the place in question. Hence, he seeks appropriate directions. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Corporation submitted that as per the orders of this Court, the representation made by M/s. Madina Education and Welfare Society, was considered and it was felt that there is no necessity to widen the road. However, subsequently considering the need, they have initiated proceedings for widening the road and have sought the consent of the owners, and the matter is under consideration by the respondent-Corporation. Admittedly, the respondent-Corporation, has already initiated proceedings for widening the road, and in such circumstances, I am of the opinion that no time limit can be fixed within which the respondent-Corporation has to widen the road, for the reasons that for widening the road, the required land has to be acquired, and it may take some time, and this apart, the land losers should be paid compensation, and payment of the same depends upon the financial budget/constraints of the respondent-Corporation, and unless and until the respondent-Corporation pays the compensation, the land owners will not be willing to part with their land. Since the respondent-Corporation is already seized of the matter, no orders need be passed in the writ petition, and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 14th October, 2009 KSR