IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 24.08.2010 C.R.No.5331 of 2010 Gurjeet Kaur ...Petitioner Versus Guru Nanak Dev University and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. H.S.Batth, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The plaintiff is in revision aggrieved against the orders passed by the Courts below, whereby ad interim injunction sought by the petitioner restraining the defendants from terminating the services of the petitioner was declined. It has been found that the petitioner was appointed on contract basis on a consolidated salary, keeping in view the number of students applying for respective courses in a particular year. The service of the petitioner was found to be not continuous and was with yearly breaks. In view of the said fact, both the Courts below have found that the plaintiff cannot be granted restraint order from engaging defendant No.5. The reasoning given by the Courts below cannot be said to be suffering from any patent illegality or irregularity, as the petitioner was a contract employee and has worked during the work of contract only. By virtue of ad interim order, the plaintiff cannot be granted the relief, which is claimed in the suit itself. In view of the above, I do not find any ground to interfere with the findings recorded by the Courts below. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed. 24.08.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE