-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.119 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.119 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.119 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION 2084 OF 2006. PETITION 2084 OF 2006. PETITION 2084 OF 2006. .............................................................. Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. .............................................................. Mr.A.P. Mundargi, with Ashish S.Gaikwad, for the Applicant. Mr.N.V. Pradhan, with R.K. Mendadkar, for the Respondent No.1. Ms. P.P. Shinde, APP, for the Respondent -State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : 8TH AUGUST, 2008 : 8TH AUGUST, 2008 : 8TH AUGUST, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Applicant. Considering the challenge in the Writ Petition, it is obvious that the Applicant has no locus for permitting his intervention in the Criminal Writ Petition. The Application is rejected only on the ground that the Applicant has no locus. -2- 2. It is made clear that no adjudication is made on the merits of contentions raised in the Application. [ A.S.OKA, J.] A.S.OKA, J.] A.S.OKA, J.]