CWP No.478 of 2008. 31.03.2008 Present: Mr. Sanjay Dutt Vasudeva, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vir Baahadur Verma, Advocate, for the respondents. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the interim order has been refused to the petitioners and the petitioners want that a direction be issued by this Court that the petitioners be engaged. We find two interim orders wherein certain directions have been issued, though the petitioners are not satisfied. The prayer of the petitioners is misconceived, which cannot be granted under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India specifically in the light of the directions issued by the State Administrative Tribunal in a pending case to consider the matter. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. March 31, 2008. ( Dev Darshan Sud ), J. (rc)