IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 4419 of 2008, Decided on: 30.03.2009. Tek Chand. … … … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. … … … Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?.1 For the petitioner: Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R. K. Sharma, Senior Additional No.1 and 2. Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General. For Respondent No.3: None. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The petitioner has assailed the transfer order dated 14.3.2007. It is not disputed by the parties that the petitioner has to superannuate within a period of eighteen months. His exact date of superannuation is 30.9.2010. He has given his option for three stations as per the transfer policy framed by the State Government. Mr. R.K. Sharma, learned Senior Additional Advocate General in these circumstances submits that the petitioner shall be permitted to discharge his duties at the present place of Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. - 2 - posting and his representation will be duly considered within a period of three months from today. In view of this categorical undertaking given by the learned Senior Additional Advocate General, the respondents are directed to permit the petitioner to remain posted at the present place of his posting and thereafter to consider his representation, whereby he has option for three stations within a period of three months from today. In view of these directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. March 30, 2009. (Rajiv Sharma) (rkv). Judge. - 3 -