1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.3391 OF 2006 M/s. Sumoto Estates Pvt. Ltd... Plaintiffs V/s. Shri Pratapsingh Shoorji Vallabhdas & Ors. .. Defendants Ms.Jyoti Tanksali i/b. M/s. Shah & Sanghai for the Plaintiffs Mr. H.V. Chande for the Defendants CORAM : S.R. SATHE,J. DATED : 17/04/2007 P.C. :- Heard learned Advocate for the Plaintiff as well as learned Advocate for the Defendant. Plaintiff is present in the Court so also defendant No.3 present in the Court. They admit to have compromised the suit as per the Consent Terms marked 'X' for identification. However, the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 are not present today. It is submitted that due to their old age they are not in a position to attend the Court. It was also submitted that they have in fact executed power of attorney in favour of defendant No.3. If it is so he should submit the same in the afternoon at 3.00 pm. 2 At 3.00 pm. The defendant No.2 present in the Court so also C.A. of defendant No.3. Defendant No.2 has signed for himself. The defendant No.1 has also signed the consent terms. Besides this, the defendant No.3 is a power of attorney holder of defendant No.1. Parties admit to have compromised the matter and drawn the consent terms marked 'X' for identification. Decree be drawn in terms of consent terms. (S.R. SATHE,J.)