IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35266 of 2010 SURESH SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 08.10.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner is in custody in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No.113 of 2002 (G.R. No. 1817 of 2002) for the offence punishable under Sections 144, 379, 427, 504, 384 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. This is a case of misuse of the privilege of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by reason of absence of pairvi of the pairvikar, his bail bonds were cancelled and he was taken into custody on 17.6.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a poor man and had gone out side the State for earning his livelihood and in absence his pairvikar had left his pairvi resulting in the eventuality. He further submits that the petitioner would abide by the condition set out by this Court for consideration of his payer for bail. 2 Taking into consideration the circumstances and submissions of the learned counsel, let the petitioner namely, Suresh Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sri R.R. Singh, Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class, Begusarai in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No.113 of 2002 (G.R. No. 1817 of 2002) subject to the condition that the petitioner would present himself before the Court below on each and every date fixed in the case and the failure on the part of the petitioner to present himself on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the Court below, would entitle the Court concerned to cancel his bail bond and to take him into custody on grounds of misuse. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J.)