IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2007 / 29TH SRAVANA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 1207 of 2007(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.10509/2007 Dated 27/03/2007 .................... PETITIONER ----------------- B.MUMTAJ, W/O.M.USMAN, AMBRAPALAYAM, ALAMKADAVU, POLLACHI. BY ADV. SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMI SRI.E.R.VENKATESWARAN RESPONDENT: ------------- SHRI.U.P.RAMACHANDRAN (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, PALAKKAD. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.T.B.RAMANI THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- Cont.Case.No.1207 OF 2007 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of August, 2007 JUDGMENT Following Annexure A1 judgment, the respondent has taken action, which has culminated in Annexures A6 and A8. According to the petitioner, issuance of proceedings in the form of Annexure A8 is essentially in defeasance of the results obtained as per Annexure A6, following the judgment. This is not an issue that could gain attention in proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act. Hence this case is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to statutory reliefs against Annexure A8. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge kkb.