£(.••< IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BHASPUR (CHHATHSGARH1 WRTT PET1TION NO..'?^S9 /2006. •-» PETITIONER: \^c-' .^y> /?^^>"' /-••"^\ ^<i""'A'^\c!-v <^y^^- ,*' •<?<u »^<" ^B" Respondents Narayan Singh Dadsena, S/o Late Charan lal Dadsena, aged about 42 years, residence of village Angari Post Belmad, Tahsil Balod, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS .0-2" .z"^ ^ ^ C^^A^ '(^^^ '^y ^ ..^.v G^ 1. State of ChhatUsgarh, Through The Secretary School Mucation Department Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ^2. Director of School Eklucation Office», D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The District Education Officer, Bemetara, ^- ~ Durg, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WMT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI. PROHIBmON AND FOR THE OTHER SIMILAR WRIT OR WRTTS. ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ;'^^ G' XI-HC-22 w^?rw f^'ri'iisn^T SftiqiflfN' srowfl B Barvf 3^ '<<wici<<, aTflu'is, Rjcfiyy 311^1 ^Wh .g^.W..0..3S&3.^ 200 *11*«1T!»»11<» fSre^ 3l]^<16«11Wfl1N' '-?. hfeve Heard Shri O.P. Sahu, oouns^l Govt. Advocate for the State/responde The case of the petitioner is| since 28-6-86 and as per Vne lnstruct| M.P. the Assistant Teachers who examination on their own expenses increments and order of Govemment B.Ed. examination on his own cost effect is Annexure-P/5, but the pe( whereas, similarly situated persons h^< under the orders of the Tribunat and tfl Having heard learned counse| and oireumstances ofthe case, ',vithoi|t case, the petitioner is allowed to mak( of this petition raising all his grievanc^ days from today and in turn, respond^ the petitioner in the light of averment^ in the representation also. ]f respor similariy situated persons have be|i increments and the petitioner's case| increments on the basis of Governntie period of 3 months from today, in acc^ With the direotion aforesaid, tl1e Parties are entitled for certlfiecl ^fter °tii<i?<i<(1-i *<iHfiTffteIA<Ri^K ^isri^rsn^T for the petitioner and Shri Sumesh Bajaj, |nts, on advance copy. |that he is working as Assistant Teacher |sns dated 24-12-98 issued by the State of have passed B.T.I., B.Ed. and M.Ed. 22-10-64 are entitled forhvo advance |s Annexure-P/1. The petitioner passed his |n the year 1993 and a certificate to that titioner has not been given the benefit been granted t'wo advance increments lis Court vide Annexure-P/6. for the parties, having regard to the faets expressing any opinion ofthe merit ofthe a detailed representation along with copy •s to respondent No.3 withln a period of 15 ;nt No.3 is dlreoted to examine the case of made by the petitioner in this petition and ident No.3 reaches to the conctusion' that 'n granted the benefit of two advance is also covered for grant of two advance lent's order, then to pass orders within a irdance with law. e petition stands disposed of. copyofthisorder. Srff- L.C. Bi-sseioo .judge (<ft^y^) 1