IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.637 of 2010 SUBODH SHARMA @ SUBODH KUMAR Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 9/ 24.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. There is clear allegation of demand and torture for its non- fulfillment but divorce case is filed though after this complaint petition. Divorce appears the ultimate result of the relation. Only a suitable alimony is needed to be decided that can be decided by the Court where divorce case is pending in Delhi. At present, petitioner undertakes to make payment of Rs. 50,000/- which will be part of the alimony. In view of the admission of his liability, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 1198C of 2009, Tr. No 236 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M., Ist Class, Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. further subject to his depositing the amount of Rs. 50,000/- by cash or Demand Draft in the Court below. The default may be taken as sufficient to cancel the bail, so granted to the petitioner. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)