g» k HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPI IR . hakaa Paikr, w/o Sa Paika, Ad eam, Asst. eacher, Gvt de Scol ‘ Pl ine, o Midl ho oice L Amb1kar Dsr1carja hattarh pu 1ttSgu, Chlsg L : 1. State VES f Chat1§ar Troug Secretary Scool dxon eaxten lmstry Bhan, u hatxsga 2. h tct uan 0ce Amxau stc Am ga alsar . Blo Edun f mu l‘t ip Saruga CMtattsar Plesent Shr C Jyant K Rao Adc r te petmer l a voate fo h on h Y S Thkur Dpy dte Geeral fr the at/reone Sn a eut Avoca n o Stespdnts. (asd on 16E; d of b 00 Pse ay Feruary, 29) T r 1 ‘ l nnt of ar counsel appeanng fr t ae att . Wth the cose lened o he pms the mer 1 d fy s hear mall L A. No. l . Tlns ls an alo ppicatin for taking dunts ocme on record. The application is ordered as prayed for. Leam‘ed l counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to grant of two increments as she has obtained DEd l - certificate on her own eupenses during the servrce period Learned l counsel liuther submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to rnake a representation to the authorities for grant of two increments pursuant to the judgment and order passed by/this Court in the matter of ”i fashwam Kumar Bharadwaj V Municipal Corporation Durg and another and W P (S ) No 4130 of 2005 Gopesh Kumar Verma vs The State Govt ofChhattzsgarh and another l l > i I . p 1 2006 (ll) MPJR CG 96 \\ ‘m WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 378 of2009 Smt Sshil a umt Sai r ge about 41 y T RjESPONDENTS o RUS htigh hh h Eucat Dpmt M D K S aw Ralpr Chtth Te Dlsn Edctlo mr bkpr Dxrlt blkapur (Sarug) Chhttgh 3 The ck catm Oficm Ab1kap1 Dsmc Ambkaur (g) tgh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . SB Hon’ble Shri Satlsh K Agmhotn, Z BETITIONER ORAL ORDER a i 4. ‘ :The State Govermnent is under an oblig v ion to follow the law seftled iby this Couxt and it is not necessary to approach this Court by each and every employee when the law has alrea y been settled by this Court. ,The employees, who are simiiarly situate& ‘and have not approached the :Court, may be treated at par with pther employees, who have gapproached this Court. It is not necessall'y to approach this Court for similar order. 5. . In gview of the foregoing reasons, this petition stands disposed of with libferty reserved to the petitioner, on the irequest of learned counsel, to x make a representation. lftherepresentation is filed by the petitioner, the i V . ; same may be considered and decided, in accordance with law on its own . merit as expeditiously as possible, preferably w1thm a period of eight " weeks from the date ofreceipt ofthe representation. g’a . i . l l l : . l l. sdl- ' ' \ Stish K-Agnihmri " ' ix Judge Amit‘ i l l l \ .a