ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1763 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.1763 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.1763 OF 2008 Mr.Goraksha Ambaji Adsul ..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Mr.Niranjan Mogre, advocate appointed for the Petitioner. Mr.P.S.Hingorani, APP for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & : BILAL NAZKI & : BILAL NAZKI & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 20TH JANUARY, 2009. : 20TH JANUARY, 2009. : 20TH JANUARY, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. The Petitioner sought parole leave which has been rejected on the ground that the Police report was against the Petitioner. As per the report, if the Petitioner is released on parole, he may cause harm to the witnesses of the case in which he was convicted in the year 2005. 2. The counter affidavit of the Respondent shows that the Petitioner had been granted parole on 07/02/2008 for a period of one month. He availed parole leave and surrendered well in time and had also gone to his village but did not cause any harm to the witnesses. ( 2 ) Therefore, there is no case to the police to come to the conclusion that the Petitioner would cause harm to the witnesses. 3. In this view of the matter, we direct the Respondent to grant parole as claimed, by following procedure in accordance with law, subject to the usual conditions to be imposed by the Respondent and necessary order be passed within one week from today. 4. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (BILAL (BILAL (BILAL NAZKI, J.) NAZKI, J.) NAZKI, J.)