IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 15TH MARCH 2007 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1928 WP(C).No. 13873 of 2005(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ P.BALAKRISHNA PILLAI S/O. PARAMESWARA PILLAI, AISWARYA, VATTAPPARAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.VINOY VARGHESE KALLUMOOTTILL RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STAE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. GOPAKUMAR, USHA BHAVAN RANDAMCHIRA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, HEAD CONSTABLE, MUSEUM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.MADHUSOODANAN – FOR R4 ADV.SMT.R.BINDU, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C)No. 13873/2005 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 : COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 17/9/2004 IN WP (Crl) NO. 160/2004. P2 : COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 13/12/2004. P3 : COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 13/12/2004. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS R4(a): COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE MISHRA VIVAHA SANGAM DATED 21/5/2004. R4(b): COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE CHELLAMANGALAM DEVI KSHETRA TRUST DATED 20/6/2004. R4(c): COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE ISSUED UNDER HINDU MARRIAGE RULE BY THE SREE KARIYAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT ON 23/6/2004. R4(d): COPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE NO. 29833 OF THE CHILD DATED 19/5/2005. R4(e): COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)No. 19892/2004 DATED 14/7/2004. R4(f): COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF AISWARAYA DATED 28/5/2005. // TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE jg C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------- WP(C) No. 13873 of 2005 B ----------------------------------------- Dated, this the 15th day of March, 2007 J U D G M E N T While the petitioner's allegation is that the 4th respondent is actively helping detention of petitioner's daughter by a relative of 4th respondent, the learned counsel for the 4th respondent referred to Ext.P1 judgment produced by the petitioner himself, wherein it is stated that a Division Bench of this Court gave an opportunity to petitioner's daughter to express her grievance, but she expressed her willingness to go with the said relative of 4th respondent and this Court accordingly released her against the petitioner's prayer. This writ petition is therefore only to be closed and I do so. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.) jg