IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35495 of 2008 AKHILESH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 27.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Police case under Sections 394 of the Penal Code. The allegations are of loot of money drawn by the informant from the Bank while on his way from the Bank after withdrawal by two unknown persons. In an investigation to find out these two persons from the impugned order it is apparent that seven persons have already been implicated. Learned counsel relies upon an order of this Court granting anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No. 34877 of 2008 noticing the undertaking to appear for test identification parade. Be that as it may, the material against the petitioner is the confession of the co-accused that the looted money was apparently kept in the house of the petitioner for some time. Learned counsel for the State fairly concedes that recovery is from the house of the co-accused but there is no material in the investigation to link up the looted money from the money withdrawn from the Bank. In the facts and circumstances of the case and absence of any antecedent of the petitioner, grant of bail to similarly situated co-accused, let the petitioner, abovenamed surrender in 2 the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail during the period of investigation till the submission of charge sheet on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Kaimur at Bhabua in Mohania P.S. case No. 117 of 2008. The petitioner shall be required to cooperate with the investigation by making himself available for the purpose at all reasonable time. In the event of failure to do so, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bonds. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)