IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18811 of 2008 MD.IBRAHIM Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 24.02.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 03.11.2007, whereby petitioner’s application for discharge has been rejected. A supplementary affidavit has been filed to the effect that still the charges have not been framed. Initially the complaint case was registered being Complaint Case No. 39 of 1997 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 395, 447 of the I.P.C. and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act which was subsequently registered as police case after being transmitted to the police under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. After investigation the police found the case false and submitted final form and recommended for prosecution of the petitioner under Sections 182, 211 of the I.P.C. when the cognizance was taken. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that during investigation, no independent witness was examined rather all the accused persons were only examined and they were made witness in the final form. It is further submitted that final form was accepted and it has never been challenged by the petitioner nor he intends to challenge the same. Considering the aforesaid contentions of the petitioner as well as the fact that the matter is continuing since 1997, no useful purpose will be served in allowing to proceed further. Let the order dated 03.11.2007 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-IV, West Champaran at Bettiah including the entire prosecution of the petitioner in Sessions Trial No. 330 of 2006 with regard to the petitioner, is hereby quashed. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)