1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.914 of 2009 IN SUIT NO.272 OF 2007 M/s Raj Enterprises ....Plaintiffs V/s. Tahir Husain Enterprises and ors ....Defendants Mr FarhaaanDubash i/b M/s Daru Shah & Co. .for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Rahul Chitnis, i/b Thakare Jariwalla & Associates for the Defendant Nos 3, 4 & 8. Mr. Rigved Sawant i/b Anil Menon & Associates for defendant Nos 5 & 6. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 5TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- 1. The amendment seeks to refer to and challenge the alleged subsequent rights created by the defendant in favour of the third party in respect of the film of which plaintiff claims to have the negative rights. 2. I see no reason to adjourn the matter to enable the parties to file a reply as they have been served well in advance. Further the parties are always at liberty to contest the matter on merits. This order does not reflect upon the same. 3. The opposition to the Chamber Summons is, therefore, 2 rejected. 4. In the circumstances this Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayers (a), (b) and (c). The amendment to be carried out within six weeks. 5. Additional written statement if any to be filed within six weeks after the defendant’s receive the amended copy of the plaint.