CWP(T) No. 5996 of 2008 23.6.2010 Present: Mr. Yudhbir Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. K. D. Shreedhar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. R. M. Bisht, Dy. A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 4. Mr. J. R. Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate, for respondent No. 5. According to the learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner the petitioner has taken away the brief. 2. Having gone through the record I am of the considered view that the petitioner is otherwise not entitled to any relief for the simple reason that her husband was actually working as a Teacher and thus she was not entitled to the appointment as a Water Carrier. Her appointment was contrary to the guidelines issued by the State. Hence the impugned order dated 22.4.1999 cannot be faulted for any reason. 3. For the aforesaid reasons the present petition stands dismissed. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. June 23, 2010 (PK)