1 WP 5071 of 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5071 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3048 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5071 OF 2006 Mr.Pavitra Walvekar .....Petitioner V/s. The Recovery Officer, DRT Pune and Ors. ..... Respondents Ms.Kirti Kohli, for the petitioner. Ms.S.Phatak i/by Mr.S.B.Deshmukh, for respondent No.2. Mr.Suchil Nimbalkar, for respondent No.4 to 7. CORAM :P.B.MAJMUDAR & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 27th OCTOBER, 2010 P.C. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that she has received oral instructions to withdraw the petition from his client, but she is waiting for written instructions, which is sent by her client through Courier. But, she confirms the fact that the dispute is settled and the petition can be disposed of as withdrawn. 2. In view of the same, it is not necessary to wait till the written instructions is received by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petition is therefore, disposed of as withdrawn. Rule discharged. 3. Liberty to apply in case of difficulty. 2 WP 5071 of 2006 4. In view of the disposal of the writ petition, the civil application No.3048 of 2007 does not survive and the same is disposed of accordingly. ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )