1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3057 OF 2009 Renuka d/o Ganpat Swami - PETITIONER VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra and others. - RESPONDENTS ***** Mr.PG Rodge, Advocate for Petitioner; Mr.VH Dighe,AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 4. Mr.VR Sonwalkar, Advocate for Resp.Nos. 2 & 3. ----- CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE : 13th November, 2009. PER COURT : . Heard. 2) By an order dated 10th June, 2009, the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Latur cancelled the appointment of the petitioner as an Anganwadi Supervisor. The Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been dismissed as Aanganwadi Supervisor. This 2 statement is not disputed by the Counsel appearing for the Zilla Parishad. 3) After hearing the parties and perusing the impugned order, we do not find any error in the impugned order passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Latur. The order is based on the material placed before the authority. In exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, no interference is called for. The petition stands dismissed. 4) The learned Counsel for the petitioner at this stage submits that in spite the petitioner having discharged her duties as an Anganwadi Supervisor prior to the date of her termination, she was not paid salaries as Anganwadi Supervisor. 5) The petitioner is entitled to file a representation to the Chief Executive Officer, 3 Zilla Parishad, Latur for claiming unpaid salary, if any, to which the petitioner is entitled to. In case a representation is filed by the petitioner, the Chief Executive Officer shall pass appropriate orders on the same and communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner, at the earliest. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) (NARESH H. PATIL) JUDGE JUDGE bdv/wp3057.09