1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5986/2006 Ram Chandra Gupta Vs. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Anr. Date of Order :: 24.7.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Anil Bhandari, for the petitioner. Mr. M.P. Goswami for Mr. Anil Bachawat, for the respondents. ... By this petition for writ a challenge is given by the petitioner to the order of transfer dated 14.8.2006. The contention of the petitioner is that as per provisions of Clause 5.6 of the Job Rotation, Transfer and Mobility Policy applicable with the New India Assurance Company Ltd. the persons having long retention at one station should have been transferred first. In reply to the writ petition it is stated by the respondents that a list as per the provisions of Clause 5.6 of the Policy referred above was prepared wherein name of the petitioner appears at S.No.1 and this discloses that the petitioner is having longest retention at Jodhpur. As per the respondents the petitioner was transferred as per the Policy applicable for having longest retention. In rejoinder to the reply, the petitioner has pointed out names of the certain persons with the allegations that they are having longer retention at Jodhpur vis-a-vis him. 2 From perusal of the averments made in the rejoinder it is apparent that all the persons named therein are not having continuous stay at Jodhpur as they were transferred in the intervening period, as such, those persons can not be treated to have longer retention at Jodhpur than the petitioner. For the reasons stated above I do not find any merit in this petition for writ, and the same is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal '