1 (WP 4002 of 1990) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4002 OF 1990 Smt. Anandbai Kashiram Teli ...Petitioner Vs. Gajanan Waman Prabhu & Anr. ...Respondents ----- None for the Petitioner None for the Respondents ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 15th February, 2011 P.C. 1. None appears on behalf of the Petitioner. It appears that by efflux of time, the petition has become infructuous. 2. The Petitioner is challenging the order passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in the Revision Application filed by the Respondents herein. The said revision application was allowed and the order dated 4.11.1988 which was passed in Tenancy Application No. 178/1986 was set aside and the revision application was directed to be placed before the Bench of MRT for final hearing and disposal on merits and in accordance 2 (WP 4002 of 1990) with law. One of the grounds raised in this petition was that the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal could not review its own order. Reliance was pleased on the judgment of this Court reported in 1986 MLJ page 520. Thereafter this issue was referred to Larger Bench of this Hon'ble Court and thereafter, the Larger Bench has held that an order of review could be passed by the MRT. 3. This being the position. Hence, no case is made out for interfering with the impugned order passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in review petition. Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed and disposed of. (V.M. KANADE J.) 3 (WP 4002 of 1990)