IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 6836 of 2008 Between: Smt. Salapu China Talli W/o. Sanyasi Rao Akkireddipalem ( V ), Gopalapuram ( Post ), Anakapalli ( M ) , Visakhapatnam Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam. 3 The Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam. 4 The Village Revenue officer, akkireddipalem, Gopalapuram Post, Ankapali Mandal, Visakhapatnam Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Madamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioner from house- site patta of Ac.0.02 cents of Land in Sy.No.s 354 and 352, Plot No.9 of Akkireddipalem Village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District granted on 7-5-1999 where she raised a foundation without following the guidelinces given under B.S.O.-15 and without notice and without following due process of law is illegal, unjust, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and be pleased to pass such other order or orders in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.E.V.BHAGIRATHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 6836 of 2008 Order: The petitioner states that she was granted house site patta in respect of the land admeasuring 0.02 cents, situated in Survey Nos. 352 and 354 of Akkireddipalem village, Anakapalli Mandal, in the year 1999. She states that immediately she constructed a thatched house in the said site and living therein. She further states that with a view to construct permanent house, she obtained permission from the Gram Panchayat on 20.5.2006, dug foundations and started construction of a house. Now the grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents, without following the procedure contemplated under BSO – 15, in that without canceling the patta granted in her favour and without issuing any notice, are trying to evict her from the land in question on the ground that the land on which she constructed house and living therein, is a Government land and it is required for ‘Indiramma Gruha Pathakam’. Hence, she filed the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: In the event the respondents intend to evict the petitioner from the land in question, they shall do so only after following the procedure contemplated under law. Till then the respondents shall not evict the petitioner from the land in question. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 13.03.2008 Ksr/Nsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KSRANI}