IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2587 of 2011 Date of Decision : February 11, 2011. Vinod Kumar .....Petitioner versus Pepsu Road Transport Corporation, Patiala and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vikas Chatrath, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner who retired from the post of Senior Assistant in the respondent-Corporation, seeks a mandamus for the release/grant of the benefits of one additional increment after four years of service under the A.C.P. Scheme applicable w.e.f. 3rd November, 2006. The petitioner has served the respondents with a legal notice dated 27.11.2010 (Annexure P3) for the grant of the aforesaid relief but no response has been received by him so far. In these circumstances and without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim, I deem it appropriate to disposed of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the above- stated claim of the petitioner and dispose of the same by passing a C.W.P.No .2587 of 2011 2 speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. In case the petitioner is found entitled to, the above said monetary benefits shall be released to him within the stipulated period. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. February 11, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE