WPCRL No. 232 of 2010 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate, present for the writ petitioners. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present for the State. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate, present for respondent No. 3 / complainant. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought quashing of the first information report dated 18.03.2010, which is registered as Crime No. 74 of 2010, relating to offences punishable under Section 120-B, 409, 420, 467, 471 of I.P.C., with police station Bhagwanpur, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. Perusal of the first information report shows that there are serious allegations of forgery and embezzlement made in the criminal complaint, registered as first information report. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners are victim of the political rivalry of the management which took over reins of the private aided College from the erstwhile management. Since, there are allegations like petitioner No. 4 Rajesh Kumar, who was member of the Management Committee, allegedly got himself appointed as employee of the College and drew the salary, and similar serious allegations of drawing the public money by making forgery in the record of the College, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the investigation of the case. Therefore, without expressing any opinion as to the merits of the investigation, this writ petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that if the petitioners surrender before the court concerned, their bail application may be heard without unreasonable tay Application No. 2092 of 2010 also stands disposed of). delay. (S (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 20.07.2010 HN