IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR. WR!TjPETmONNQ;/zOVac>F2006 PETITIONER ; . - 'A-L^.-'"'^^ - .:^^^:> ! .sSi^^ ...•••' .cs,<*'/i, !(..'••• ^^^". 'y RESPONDENTS Madan Singh, aged @.bout 48 years, S/o Shri Rameshwar Singh, Occupatioh Forest Ranger, Forest Rsinge Sahaspur Lohara, Division Kawardha , Dista-ict KabirdhamfC.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh/ Through-.The Secretary, Forest ; Deparfment, ,. D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) . . .: ^ 2. M.L.Sidar, ^ ,. Fprest Ranger,. Forest Range Sahaspur Lohara, Division Kawardha , Districf Kabirdham (C.G.) . ^ WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2267227 OF THE CONSflTUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE JVmT__ IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE UKE NATURE ETC. XI-HC-22 3^ •^WW^, ®Tfl'M'IS,fs|Cllt<y 3TT^?I l-ra^ ^_m\D.l.\^... «m?tTsn*<ich ^ 200 fSre^; sn^r^r R-ii+sn^T CTra;nf5cr sn^rgHtTSKHfN' <oi<ifa<(1-i *ii>iflTit'te^<Ri<^i< ^arf^irsn^T chalierlged respo[nden dated 08-08-2006 Shri Rajesh Pandey, couns|el Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. on advance copy. Heard. By the instant writ petition of India, the petitioner has (Annexurs-P/1), passed by petitioner to Sahaspur Lohara, The case of the petitionefr Annexure-P/2, dated 24.06.20061 order could be implemented, 01.07.2006 (Annexure-P/3) frorti Kawardha and in pursuance of Thereafter, again that transfer crder whereas the petitioner has| as such once the transfer order is Learned counse! for the pe< the petitioner may be ailowed respondent No.1 highiighting th&] be directed to decide the same State/ respondent No.1 has no Having heard leamed the facts and circumstances of counsel for the petitioner Therefore, the petitioner is al!ow4< for the petitioner. 4dvocate for the State/ respondent No.1, She tKat Has tinder Article 226/227 of the Constitution his transfer order dated 25.07.2006 respo[ndent No.1 whereby the transfer of the 01.07.2006 has been cancelled. itionefr is that first he was transfsrred vide rom Janakpur to Khairagarh, before that was transferred vide order dated Baikunthpur to Sahaspur Lohara, order he joined at Sahaspur Lohara. been cancelled vide the impugned [already joined at the transferred piace, ixecuted that cannot be cancelled. litioner submits that in the circumstances to make a detailed representation to ]above anomalies and respondent No.1 to|which learned counse! appearing for the objection. cour)se! for the parties and having regard to (he case, the prayer made by learned appe|ars to be just, fair and reasonable. f^d to make a detaiied representation to (iftir^ir) 731 "ifl-qK'l.q, 81Tfl+|i|S, fc|cl|ti^< 3T7^?T4siFb HTHctrsniith "V^ 200 Ri*«^ STI^T^T f^TRTsn^r sbiiti (rigg' SbW / Soma ^ ^ ^ 3;n^T??HTWH)?(T trie respondent No.1 raising all hj anomalies, annexing a copy of th|< ten days from today and in turn, same within a period of one montl^ ai! the grievances raised by th^ accordance with law. In the mi petitioner is decjded, the effect ^i respectofthe petitioner shall With the aforesaid directionls Consequently, M.(W.). P. Parties are entitled for certfl dnd remain Mo js grievances highlighting the above instant writ petition within a period of r^spondent No.lisdirected to decide the •^ from the date of its receipt, considsring petitioner in an objective manner, in i^antime, till the representation of the operation of the impugned order in stayed. >, the writ petition stands disposed of. >.3119/2006 a!so stands disposed of. fied copy of Shis order. ^raWt? wRff ff te'^t'rfSi^rc ^sri^R'an^T L.C.Bl Judi 00 'ge (>fl^sl<ati) ^