AB 1651/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K MERUNO Heard Mr A Paramanik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr K Munir, learned Addl. PP, Assam. As directed by this Court, the learned Addl. PP, Assam, has produced Case Diary. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and also on perusal of the Cas e Diary, it appears that the present dispute between the parties is matrimonial dispute arising out of second marriage. The police, as per the Case Diary, have recorded the statement of the accused petitioners except the petitioner No 1. Th is Court after hearing the learned counsel for the parties had granted interim b ail to the accused petitioner Nos 2, 3 and 4. Accordingly, the petitioner Nos 2, 3 and 4 have appeared before the Investigating Officer as per direction of this Court. Since the direction of this court as per order dated 15.6.2011 passed by this Court has been complied with by the accused petitioner Nos 2, 3 and 4. The interim bail granted vide order dated 15.6.2011 is made absolute. Bail application stands disposed of.