IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2011 / 29TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 19717 of 2011(L) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ VINOD K.J., AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.JOHNY, KOLLANOOR HOUSE, P.O.AVINASSERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT- 680313. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR, COLLECTORATE, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR-680001. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEDUPUZHA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR-680382. 3. NANO EXCEL ENTERPRISES PVT.LTD., 145/C GROUN FLOOR, OPPOSITE SAI BABA TEMPLE, BENGAL RAO NAGAR HYDRABAD-530380 REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, DR.HAREESH MADDINENI. 4. NANO EXCEL CORPORATION LTD.,NO.308, BDA BUILDING NO.5, JANAKPURI, NEW DELHI-110058, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, DR.HAREESH MADDINENI. 5. NANO EXCEL ENTERPRISES PVT.LTD., SOUTH INDIA HEAD OFFICE,NO.XXXII/204,UNICHIRA, OPPOSITE JUMA MASJID, INJIPARAMBU EDAPALLY TOLL, CHENGAPUZHA NAGAR POST, COCHIN-24, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, DR.HAREESH MADDINENI. WP(C).No. 19717 of 2011(L) -2- 6. NANO EXCEL ENTERPRISES PVT.LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE, TMC-36-828, GROUND FLOOR, HARWIN REGENCY, POLIYAM ROAD, THRISSUR-680001, DISTRICT THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, DR.HAREESH MADDINENI. 7. NANO EXCEL ENTERPRISES PVT.LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, H.NO.95/1, SEVEN CROSS, NEAR GOVT.M MODEL SCHOOL, DOMMULAR VILLAGE, BANGALORE-560071, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, DR.HAREESH MADDINENI. 8. NANO POWER CORPORATION TLD., 1-98/9/7/H/1, 12-B-1, JAIHIND SOCIETY, MADHAPUR, HYDERABAD- 500 081, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, DR.HAREESH MADDINENI. 9. DR.HAREESH MADDINENI, 145/C GROUND FLOOR OPPOSITE SAI BABA TEMPLE, BENGAL RAO NAGAR, HYDERABAD-530380. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL SRI.K.A.JALEEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 19717 of 2011(L) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS EXT.P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 06/07/11 IN W.P.C.17410/11 //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ W. P. C. No.19717 of 2011 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J The issue raised in this Writ Petition filed by the petitioner who claims to be an innocent promoter of the business conducted by respondents 3 to 8 hereinafter referred to as “Nano Companies” complaining that he is being harassed by respondents 1 and 2, The Superintendent of Police, Thrissur and Sub Inspector of Police Nedupuzha is in fact already considered and decided by us in other Writ Petitions including W.P.C. Nos.18708, 18867 and 18993 of 2011. Having considered the submissions addressed before us by Sri.Rajit, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.K.A.Jaleel, the learned Additional Advocate General, we are of the view that this Writ Petition can be disposed of in W. P. C. No.19717 of 2011 -2- terms of the decision taken by this Court in its judgment dated 15/07/11 in W.P.C.18708 of 2011 and connected cases. Hence, we annex a copy of that judgment to this judgment. For the various reasons stated in the judgment and and W.P.C. Nos.17410, 17592 & 18116 of 2011 and the common judgment in W.P.C. Nos.18708/11 and connected cases and on the basis of the impressions we have gathered from the submissions addressed at the Bar by Sri.Rajit, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.K.A.Jaleel, the learned Additional Advocate General, we are of the view that the allegations levelled by the petitioner that the police is harassing him without any justifiable reason is unfounded. We are convinced that at the moment the police only wants to question the petitioner in connection with the various crimes registered against the officials and promoters of money chain business in connection with the money chain scam in which the company respondents and the Managing W. P. C. No.19717 of 2011 -3- Director of the company respondents are obviously involved. 2. We record the submissions of the learned Additional Advocate General that the police will issue notice to the petitioner under Section 160 Cr.P.C. before requesting their attendance. We also record the Additional Advocate General's further submission that if it becomes necessary to arrest the petitioners, the procedure as provided in Section 41(A) to (D) of the Cr.P.C and other provisions of law to the extent applicable will be adhered to strictly. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE C. K. ABDUL REHIM JUDGE kns & dpk/- W. P. C. No.19717 of 2011 -4-