IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 26TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 4TH ASWINA 1930 CRP.No. 719 of 2008() --------------------- E.P. NO. 319 OF 2007 LA.506/2006 of MUNSIFF COURT, HOSDRUG .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): 2ND RESPONDENT ----------------------------------- M. KRISHNAN, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O. A.K.CHIRUKANDAN, RESODOMG AT KADINJIMOOLA, NILESHWAR VILLAGE, P.O. THAIKADAPPURAM, KASARAGOD. BY ADV. SRI.KODOTH SREEDHARAN RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- 1. M.MUHAMMED KUNHI, S/O. C.H.ABDULLA, KALLOORAVI NORTH, KASARAGOD. 2. M.K.KUNHIRAMAN, PURATHAKKAI, NILESHWAR, NILESHWAR VILLAGE. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * C.R.P.NO. 719 of 2008 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 26-09-2008 ORDER The petitioner who is the judgment debtor who conceded for an award of Rs. 68,000/- on 9-12-2006 before the Lokh Adalath under the Legal Services Committee, Hosdurg challenges Ext.P2 order dated 16-08-2008 passed by the Munsiff's Court, Hosdurg in E.P. No. 319 of 2007 in L.A. 506 of 2006 issuing warrant of arrest against him for his detention in civil prison for two months or until he pays the sum of Rs. 68,000/-. 2. In as much as the petitioner was a consenting party to the award passed by the Lokh Adalath and he has committed default in paying the amount as agreed to by him, I do not find any illegality in the order passed by the executing court holding that he has means to pay the decree amount and he is deliberately evading the order of the Lokh Adalth. The finding of the court below is a pure C.R.P.NO. 719 of 2008 -:2:- finding on fact and there is no error of law or jurisdiction warranting interference by this Court under Sec. 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 3. This Revision is accordingly dismissed. The revision petitioner is given three months' time from today to deposit the amount due before the executing court failing which the impugned order shall stand revived and shall be enforced against the petitioner. Until the expiry of the said three months the impugned order shall be kept in abeyance. This Civil Revision Petition is disposed as above. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani.