m^^':iti^A-'xEaEtei-s-n--'.i3Js S^'SE fese.pg.·^^^ jiSiiuy. itay. fliiyi w^m IAS ysiay. St *BUi os Sj.e ay^ tLU^3& &MJ.E MiU-l* -UtiS lfl6& .--* •£ •to'a g A£ttiti6J. JL J. AtlVi JB^fiSB yw^. bi^ ^ta.Uij. 'tttfi S£ &IK M(,i&-^ JUflSfcU -2 •k'a 1 jiSttLte&j. j.Ky. aiiyi teyiay A&fcifi jya'ijzy. *MK 02 Slffi fiSAb te.l^fc^ &ialiE fi5JJb &JLA Mlfia—1••• !&ELUs!E -J. 'a&^JJss ^ •h'S. S-jAl. 'a^ ^i^y. MMte. 'AM: 4^aji4t. '2-Atefe 'a^ itlj. u'^ha.tA J.aiti'l-^ taaj.iy.a SO&h J.MB 1113 a^j.iy. .ysMA H^MS Msi^"" /^/^ /< .^ y ^^^/ .^^- 'A' tf Y/A7 s-Mti^ a&J|lfc« <b6U« ^'S'ii^i sooz/ ^fattj^j. Abjjy. ' •itS 1 jAu.M^.'ftfcLU.&s. i"LS &ItVUS &yAia /•'• J4U.U— A.P XI-HC-22 3^ •^IWK'I-M, ®Tfltf'IS,fsldl'M^ _C,;^'V^'^/o^- WfvfTvKWK""""'""""""^ 200 sn^T^r R-fi+sn^r SXWfi WdfStT 311^1 ^wiWdfer 13-6-2005 Mr. Shree Kuinar AU Asgar, counsel Conipany bimlted. None for fhe respo^idents. Heard on adinissic VIIIfh Additiorial Bflaspur, vide award dated 28 awarded coiiipensation ofRs.^ Yadav agam.st the applicaat N and ofhers, aad beiag aggriev been pieferred by fhe appUcau The applicaat con fhe Claiins Tribunal aUowed d and appeal under fhe Mot^ fherefore, they have preferred| the Code of Civil Pfocedure, 1| part ofSection 115(1) offhe 0| below : - 115. Revision.- (1) "TJjie of anv case which subordinate to such Hi^h fhereto, aad ifsuch subt tii<it<itfl.f iiiHrtTffte'<fl <R|«I< ^sri^iTgn^r iganval, Senior Advocate wifh Mr. 'or fhe AppUcaat National Insurance IMotor Accidents Claims Tribuiial, 12-2005, in Claim Case No.82/2004, |,OQO/ - to fhe clamiant Duwas Ram Sitional lasurance Coiapany Lunited •d by fhat award, this revision has tended that, vide iiupugned award, onipensation less thaa Rs.10,000/- >r Vehicles Act, 1988 is barred, fhis revision uader Section 115 of >08 against fhe award. The relative ide of Civil Procedure, 1908 reads as High Court m.ay eall for fhe record llias been decided bv anv Court Court and in which no appeal lies rdinaj^ Court appears - xxx xxx xx" (^^l^) • / XI-HC-22 sn^rqir R-fi+sn^r gnN'gf?g' ssr »<iiiii<i<i,»T(I«'IS,Kiinwy SIK^T' @ c t11*1CTI"»)HT<*) iK^.iyic*>/ _ / :'M".zf3/^^ ^^•-[^ 200 STI^TgWIIWtlfeT Subordiuation of Section 3 of fhe Code of Ciy. below : - Courts has been defined under |1 Procedure, 1908, which reads as Code, fhe District Coun and eveiy CivU Courf of Court aad eveiy Court o: High Court aud District ofboth Barc readias the High Court caa exercise if 115 of the Code of Civil Proi| under challenge has been pas; Causes. Claims Tribunals Goveranient exercisin.g powers| 165 of fhe Motor Vehicles Ac1 Vehicles Act, 1988 also descril fhe Claims Tribunals and alsc against fhe award passed by C] Tnbunals have been deelare< provisions of fhe Motor Vehi enipowers fhe High Court to +l'i<fcl^l-l 4|t|c)Tfftet^<t'»l<^K Eti3TRpT3II^T urts. - "For fiie purposes of fhis is subordiaate to fhe High Court, a grade inferior to fhat bf a District SniaU Causes .'is subordiuate to fhe ;ourt." fhe above provisions unveils ttiat, ;visional jzirisdiction under Section :edure, 1908 oaly when the order (ed by Civfl Court or Court of SmaU ^iave been constituted by the State coitferred on fhem. iinder Section (, 1988. Chapter XII of fhe Motor |)es fhe procedure to be foUowed by provides the provisions for appeal laims Tribunals. Neittter fhe Clainis <^ Civil Courts luider aay of the ;les Act, 1988 nor the said Act sxercise jurisdiction under Section (tftty^) F XI-HC-22 'SSf -i||<||c|t|, ESTfly'Ko, isltflltfy 3lK;?l.L'?lch -c.:.'.^:.^..:.'i?Z6^. li*<ni'!»>*iich ••••••••^.••••••••"•^FJ200 3II^T?iT f^rwsn^r shHiehufga 311^1 dlWflf?cT 115 of fhe Code of Civfl Procedi by aay of the Motor Accideats Goveniment, eiapowered to rules, did not inake Section 1 1908 appUcable to any award ouly provisions of fhe Code of Motor Accidents Clattns 240 offhe M.P. Motor Velucles Rules reads as below : - 240. Procedwe to be idake Tribubals holdlag enquiries. - Code of CivU Procedure, provided in the Act or the the First Schedule to fhe 1908) namely, those cont 15 to 20, Order IX, Ord( Rules 2 to 21, Order XVI] 1 to 3 shatl appty to proc so far as they inay be Appeal agauist aw^ Motor Accidents Claims Tnbudal Vehicles Act, 1988 or Rules, power of revision agauist such| Court nor ,ftie said provision tii<<F<'i41-< *ii*«iTfftec&<,f«i't<i< ^i3i1^iT3n^r \u~e, 1908 agaiast fhe award passed Claims Tribunals. Even fhe State rules, although have framed 115 of fhe Code of Civfl Procedure, Ipassed by a Claims Tribiuial, and pivil Procedure, 1908, applicable to >, have been described in Rule IRules, 1994. Rule 240 ofthe said gollpwed by Claims Tribunal ia AJipUcations of certain provisions of |t908; Save as ofherwise expressly jse rules, fhe foUowiiig provisions of |Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 fV of ^iaed ia Order V, Rules 9 to 13 aad 4r XVIII, Rules 3 to 10, Order XVI, \, Oider XXI and Order XXIII, Rules •^ediags before a Clatms Tribunal in thereto. apppicable Lrd below Rs.10,000/- passed by a is barrcd, but under fhe Motor 1994 fi-amed fhereuiider, neither award has been conferred on High l^as been inade appUcable to claiia ('ft^^l^) XI-HC-22 'yss "41.41cf•4, siTn+ns, (sicii^y _<OT?r^,^Ar *ii*iCTi'sn*ii<»i•••••••••••••^.•••••" g^ 200 -—-<* fcTC^" sn^T^r i^iraan^r »1 flf^(T Q.Smgh c<w 3<l^l^<<IIW(lf?tT Tribilnals cases. MotorAccidents Clamils under specific provisions of th^. said Tribunals have not been the High Court for fhe purpose^ Procediire, 1908, aud accordinlg Procedure, 1908, fhe said of Courts for fhe purposes of th{ Froin the aforesaid Motor Accidents Claims fhe High Court for fhe purposei Procediu-e, 1908, fherefore, fti^ Tribiinal, fhough not revisional jurisdictioa under Procedure, 1908. Accordiagly, the disnussed in Jimine. The appropriate reiuedy avaUable Triburtals appeala^le 4>l'utc'l41-t tllMdTftTs'-d <KlW)<, ^isri^irgn^r Tribunals have been estabUshed Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 aad Uie declarcd as Courts subordinate to of Section 115 of the Code of Civil to Section 3 of fhe Code of Civii do not coiae withm fhe edi&ce CodeofCivUProcedure, 1908. discussions, it is held that, ttte are not Courts siibordiaate to of Section 115 of the Code of Civil ; unpugned award, passed by the ;, will not be ainenablc to tlie iection 115 of fhe Code of Civil r4vision is not tenable, hence it is ^pplicant, if advised, niay/take u4der the law. Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge (ift^^fsir) \'