IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN SATURDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2011 / 29TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 13673 of 2008(C) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- RAJEEV T, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.BHASKARAN, THAYATT HOUSE, ERAVANNUR P.O., NARIKKUNI (VIA) KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.S.CHANDRASEKHARAN SMT.PRIYA DEVI.P SMT.LEKSHMI SWAMINATHAN SMT.BEATRICE FERIA RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DIRECTOR, THE VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, TRIVANDRUM. 4. THE JOINT REGISTRAR GENERAL, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KOZHIKODE. 5. NANMANDA CO-OPERATIVE RURAL BANK LTD, NANMANDA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.N.MANOJ R5 BY ADVS. SRI.N.K.SUBRAMANIAN, SRI.S.ANANTHAKRISHNAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.13673 of 2008 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th August, 2011 JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed mainly seeking a direction to the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General) Kozhikode, to enquire into Ext.P1 representation and take appropriate action. It is now submitted at the Bar by the learned counsel on both sides that by Ext.P11 order produced in W.P(C)No.30878 of 2008 the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General), Kozhikode has directed the 5th respondent bank to terminate the service of Sri.Surendran and Sriu.Sudheesh Kumar, who were appointed as Night Watchmen in the year 2007 based on the inclusion of their names in a rank list which ceased to be valid on 22.5.2005. The said two employees have thereupon filed W.P(C) No.30878 of 2008 challenging the said order. In such circumstances, as the grievance voiced by the petitioner in Ext.P1 stands redressed and that has resulted in W.P(C)No.30878 of 2008, I am of the opinion that no further orders are called for in this writ petition. The remedy of the petitioner now is to get himself impleaded as a W.P(C).No.13673 of 2008 -:2:- respondent in W.P(C)No.30878 of 2008, if he is interested, and seek to defend the order challenged in that writ petition. Without prejudice to that right this writ petition is closed as infructuous. P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge. ahg. P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- W.P(C).No.13673 of 2008 ---------------------------- JUDGMENT 20th August, 2011