sa622.11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ SECOND APPEAL NO.622 OF 2011 GEETABAI DAMODHAR PAWAR AND ANR VERSUS ANNA NANA BHOSALE ... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr.Mane V.M. Advocate for Respondent sole : Mr.R.R. Barhate. ... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. Dated: December 19, 2011 ... Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2 The learned Counsel for respondent tenders across the Bar copy of compilation of the documents including the document rectifying the mistake in revenue record. The documents is taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. From perusal of the said document, it appears that Shri Anna Nana Bhosale - respondent sa622.11 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ herein has stated in the said document i.e. correction deed without consideration, that in the sale deed, which was executed in the year, 1997, by mistake, the area mentioned was 2 acres 3 gunthas = 84 R . The respondent herein has stated that said mention of area i.e. 2 acres 3 gunthas was by mistake instead of 2 H. 3 R. Accordingly, correction deed has been signed by both the parties. The said document is taken on record and second appeal is disposed of in terms of the correction deed. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) PLK/*