)--. (L^ IN THE HON'BLE HI&H CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. rsv NO. /2011 PETITIONER ^^i%^ ^^•^y ^>" '^--"" RESPONbENTS ^1*-"^ A%', ^' /: Gopai Prasad Lahre, S/o Late Udey Ram Lahre, aged about 46 years, Lecturer, (yovt. Higher Secondary School, Utarda, Block-Pali, bisttrict- Korba (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of ChhattiS9arh, Through - The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, b.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Korba, bistt.- Korba (C.G.) Bfock Education Officer, Pali, Block-Pali, bistt.-Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETETION UNbER ARTtCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTEON OF INDIA STT^I-^T f^li5*) 3Tlt?T 5h^ich ^f^a ~5^( ^\^w^, ^Ti1<H^(o, I®i^ii^y 3Ti^?T T^T^ ^-W.C^-^1, HTWir 5h^|ch '200 •I^^ST' ^TT^T'^rrajT Tri^Tf chNf<r<<>flr1 'WT^ff "? 'ftISt iFal^K ^T^^W 317^[ SB : IHon'ble Shri Manlndm Ittolian Sfarivastava, J.1 11.5.2011 + Shri A.S. Rajput, counsel Shri P. Bhadiui, Ranel I|,awyer for the State/respondents, on advance copy. Heard on admission. appeari|ig beitefit Leamed counsel tlie petiUoner is entiUed to account of he having passe^l appointment at his own cos1| involved in fhe present petitioti same has been finalty decided| the case of Asha Saxena vs. MPJR fSC) S9. It is furtlier submitted similar view in its order for fhe petitioner. for fhe petitioner submits fhat of two advance increments on B.Ed. examination betbre his It is submitted fhat (he issue is no longer res integrm and ttie by fhe Hon!tile Supreme Court in State of M.P. & Ors., 2009 faat fhis Coiirt has also taken a dated 06-02-2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Lejamed counsel for fhe petitioner furttier draws attention of fhisj Court to order dated 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal No. 124 'pf 2009, wherein relying upan fhe judgment of fhe Supreme Cqurt in tiie case of Asha Saxena (supra) and fhe order passed b^ this Court tn another Writ Ap^al .1^ M3^€ /!^s'%. '^ |). :; $XI-HC-22 ^^ 3TT^T^T '' fqrli<=fi 3Tlt?T 5b^if^ ^f^a ^aEf ^ii<4id^l, ^>Til<44i(o, ^xni^y 3T^T '^S^K HW^\{ ^^^—————'^•^ 200 'fN^T' N0.87/200R, directions have case for grant of two advanc^ 21-09-1974 issued by the verification ofthe facts pleade^ Leamed counsel for fht the petitioner would also be In view of the finally disposed off wifh a dir^ction to consider and decide the claILm advance tncrements as per c4'cular the State of Madhya Prade^ pleaded in ftie petition, witlu4 date of receipt of copy of fhis cjrder. t^een issued for consideration ofthe increments as per circuter dated |8tate of Madhya Pradesh, after in fhe petition. respondents submits fhat case of cdnsidered on the same Unes. stateident chi<Li(<n41ri ^w^i ^ T^S <psi^i< ^T ^srf^R 3TT^T made above, this petiticm m to the respondent aufhorities of the petitioner for grant of two dated 21-09-1974 issued by to, after verification of the facts a period of three monfhs flnom fhe »—"£,'""" JTtt^