HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH C.R.P.NO.3825 OF 2010 Dt.3.9.2010 Between: I.Venugopal Reddy ..Petitioner And K.Kumaraswamy ..Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH C.R.P.NO.3825 OF 2010 ORDER: The civil revision petition is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order in O.E.P.No.6 of 2007 in O.S.No.18 of 2003 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati, dated 28.7.2009, in partly allowing the E.P., with regard to the awarded amount alone. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is entitled to interest also on the delayed payment. Admittedly, the award does not contain any terms for payment of interest and therefore the court below rightly held that the parties cannot go beyond the terms of the award which is binding on the parties. In the absence of any specific clause enabling the petitioner to realize the future interest on the awarded amount, the petitioner is not entitled to claim the same. Accordingly, the E.P. was ordered for the awarded amount alone. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not see any infirmity, legal or otherwise in the order impugned. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. However, it is open for the petitioner to take appropriate legal steps for amendment of the award, if he is so advised. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. 3.9.2010 kpr