IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10553 of 2006 RAM SAGAR SAO, S/o Late Babulal Sao, Resident of Village – Kali Pahari (Jai Nagar), P.O. + P.S. – Lakhisarai, District – Lakhisarai. …… Petitioner Versus 1. THE Regional P.F. Commissioner (Pension), Bihar, Patna, R. Block, Road No. 6, District – Patna. 2. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension), Bhagalpur. 3. General Manager, N.T.C. Unit Mokama, Patna (A Govt. of India Undertaking). 4. The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Lakhisarai, Naya Bazar, Lakhisarai, District – Lakhisarai. ….. Respondents ----------- 3 06.04.2011 Heard Sri Mahendra Prasad Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.K. Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 & 2 i.e. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner & Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, respectively. The present writ petition was filed with a prayer to direct the respondent, particularly, respondent nos. 1 & 2 to refix the pension of the petitioner. In this case, a detailed counter affidavit has been filed, wherein, it has been indicated that pension was fixed in accordance with provisions of ‘Employees Pension Scheme, 1995’. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition may be disposed 2 of with liberty to file a representation before respondent no. 1. The submission has not been objected by learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 & 2. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner, to file representation before Respondent No. 1, and if such representation is filed, it is expected, that same will be examined and disposed of, in accordance with law, preferably, within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. Petition stands disposed of. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)