IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27142 of 2009 NAKSHATRA MAHTO, SON OF LATE MOHAN MAHTO, RESIDENT OF BELSANDI DIH, P.S.- BIBHUTIPUR, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR. ----- PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2 7.9.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is named accused in a case under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire case made out in the First Information Report is improbable because on the date of occurrence it is said that the petitioner’s grand daughter had visited the house of the informant to ask about the gotni of the informant and on getting information that she was not in her house, he committed theft. Learned counsel also refers to a letter contained in annexure-2 wherein it is stated that several villagers have doubted the involvement of this petitioner in this particular occurrence. Be that as it may, petitioner Nakshatra Mahto is directed to be released on bail if he has a clean antecedent, in Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 116 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of rupees ten thousand with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)