1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.495 OF 2009 Santosh s/o Uttamrao Gath Petitioner Versus Indumati @ Pooja w/o Santosh Gat and another Respondents Mr. M.P.Kale, advocate for the petitioner. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 11 th June, 2009. ORAL ORDER: 1 Heard Shri M.P.Kale, learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2 The application tendered in the proceedings initiated under Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code, for recalling the witness in exercise of powers under Section 311 Cr.P.C., came to be rejected by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Parbhani. The Revision Application tendered by petitioner-husband raising challenge to the interlocutory order, passed by the Magistrate, has also been rejected by learned District Judge-2, Parbhani, in view of the order dated 8 th June 2009. The order passed by the Magistrate, which has been confirmed by the Revisional Court, is subjected to challenge in this writ petition presented under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2 3 Considering interlocutory nature of the challenge, it is not appropriate for this Court to cause interference in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 4 Criminal Writ Petition No.495 of 2009 stands rejected summarily. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/criwp49509