CW9950/2009 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9950/2009 Sualal S/o Kajod Vs. Bhorilal and Others Date of Order ::: 16.12.2010 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Dr. Prakash Chandra Jain, Counsel for petitioner Shri Raghunandan Sharma, Counsel for respondents #### By the Court:- This writ petition has been filed against order of Board of Revenue dated 21.07.2009 by which revision filed by respondents has been allowed and parties were directed to maintain status-quo with regard to land in dispute and they have been further directed that such land shall not be either mortgaged or sold or otherwise alienated in any manner and no construction thereupon be made. Dr. Prakash Chandra Jain, learned counsel for petitioner, argued that petitioner is facing hardship and that he has many members in the family, he wants to raise certain construction in the land, therefore, he should be allowed to raise construction at his costs and risk. Shri Raghunandan Sharma, learned counsel for respondents opposed that prayer and submitted that their predecessor-in-title was entitled to one-half share whereas he was given one-third share CW9950/2009 // 2 // taking advantage of fact that he was illiterate. All these issues will be decided in the suit which is pending trial. Learned Board of Revenue, in facts of present case, has passed a reasoned and detailed order directing the parties to maintain status-quo. I see no infirmity in impugned order. Trial court is expected to expedite trial and try to conclude it within a period of one year from date a copy of this order is produced before it. It is made clear that any observations made by Revenue Board and this court would not be construed to reflect on merits of the case of either of the parties. Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//