IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2008 / 31ST ASHADHA 1930 RP.No. 774 of 2008() ---------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WA.459/2006 Dated 17/06/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT IN W.A. ----------------------------- M.SURENDRAN, JUNIOR ACCOUNTANT, NILAMBUR CO- OPERATIVE URBAN BANK, LIMITED, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.JOJO A.V. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS : ---------------------- 1. STARE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF CO- OPERATION @ GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO.OP.SOCIETIES GENERAL, MALAPPURAM. 3. NILAMBUR CO.OP.URBAN BANK LTD., NILAMBUR MALAPPURAM, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 4. PRABHAKARAN, KARULAMPOYIL HOUSE THRIKAIKUTHY PO., WANDOOR, MALAPPURAM. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENNY GERVACIS THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.KOSHY & P.N.RAVINDRAN, JJ. -------------------------------------- R.P.No.774 OF 2008 in W.A.No.459 of 2006 ------------------------------------- Dated 22nd July, 2008 ORDER Koshy,J . This review petition is filed stating that petitioner's seniority was not counted. As per the service rules, if his junior is promoted during the period of his leave, that promotion will be valid and petitioner will come as his junior. His seniority can only be considered for subsequent promotions after he re-joined duty. That has been specifically mentioned in the judgment also. No grounds are made out for reviewing the judgment. A review petition cannot be equated to an appeal or a petition for rehearing the matter. There is no merit in the review petition. The review petition is dismissed. J.B.KOSHY JUDGE P.N.RAVINDRAN JUDGE tks