••'; ^ ,^''•-'^-; ^6^/o. @r [^^/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHE-IATTISGARH AT BlLASpUR (C.G«) Writ petition No. 3>5/7 /2003/ PETITION2R / Dev prasad Mlshra S/o Shri Bhikham -<£— Mishra^ aged about 5r2^years, resident of Sirgitti, l^h.Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). Ver s u s R.E3PONDENTS "^ ^f i^^^w^ ^^ ^y ^:' ^ ^ : l^ State o£ ChhattisgarM Tbrough : Secretary, Hoine Department, D<,K,S^Bhawan, Raipur (C.G,). 2» iMspector GeneralPolice, Bilaspur ,(C.G.). 3, Saperintendent of Police, Bilaspur (C*G.). 4, StatJLon House Officer Police Sfcation^ Tarbahar^ Bilaspur (C.G^) 5, District Magistrate, Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 6. Onkar A^asthi S/o Ram Khilawan 7o Gajanand Awastfai o/o Ram Khilawan 8, Raghublr Jwasthi S/o Ram Khiilawan 9, Sanil A^rasthi S/o Gajanand Awasthi 10. Bijjti A^asthi S/o Onkar A^asthi. 11, Bhura A^asthi S/o Onkar A^asthi, No» 6 to 11 Caste - Brahman, resident of Sirgitti^ Tahsil Silaspar, District Bilaspur (C.G.). pETITION UNDER ARTICLEs 226/227 OF THE GGNSTITUTION OF INDlft. FOR APpROPRIATE NRJT OR DIRECTION The above named petitioner begs to sabmit as under:- ^•.,contd -h XI-HG—78 -g~^ ^j!qi^!4, '^tTl^^Ko, f^TRTy ...^.f...Co.....<5.S.Ll.l..., ^T^T^ra^ (^rf^^) °3 ^TT^F "^T fe^ "?fsfj W^T'^RT^' ^^TW^tiH^T^T 02^2004^ m Shri Manoj Mishra, Shri P.Das. »,L, for The petttioner has pr Artiole 226/227 of the that the respondents N0^6 petitionec who is a coijinsel for the petitioner<» the State^ ^ferred this writ petition unaer of India on the ground II are legulayly harrassing the of the respondents No<i6toll Con^titution 1J.O neighol()our er cenfral The petitioner is Rallway Department and the in the Excise Department land bety^en him and pending befo^e the Revenue dent N0o6 left the water f< agricultural land of the ob jectedto ttiat ^ the ana threatened to kill himl m^de to responclent No<,4 , S On 09.06,2001 & 05<07<2001 th@ petitioner and the pet: cornolaint to the pollce bul in the matter ^ Bven^ the the CJM, and the CJM viae ^ respo^ident ^T^f^H 'WT^f ^ 'fe^l T^^K ^3tRR3?^T aAd resooijidents government employee in the |respondent No^7 is a constable there is some dispute regarding No<6 to 11 and matter is jCotirt. On 13«10.2000^ the respon- ^om hls tubewell to go on the p^titioner and whenthe petitioner o^dent No<»6 abused the petitioner and complaint to that effect was IH^O^ Police Station Tarbhaar • alsothe respondent N0^6 threatened Ltioner is regularly ma-king ^ theya re not taking any a ction ^etitloner filed a complaint before .ts order dated 22^02^2003 ordered XI-HC-22 STI^T'SFT 1^li?T^T}t^T ^^Nr^lfi^ Roshan/ sunita 4- o/ ^' ^^ ^i^i<n<Ls, ^'a1^^i<o, N^(^^< 3Ti^T 'q^^ •Nra^i? *^ii<** •M 200 i^^sr' ^Tr^T'^ITaiR^rT (2) for registratlon of the c] matter^ But, till date t| chargesheet or taking any] In view of fche abovel to make a representation Bilaspur regarding all hi| Superintendent of Police the petitloner and dlrect| look into fche grievarKses With the aforesaid disniissed< jase and to investigate the |ie police 1s not fillng any action* fact^ the petitioner 1s allowed |to the Superintendent of Police, |s grievances and in turn^ the Iwill consider the complaint of some responslble officer to |of the petitioner<» <3|irectlon» the petition is <^l^i<rs<flvl ^M<A ^ fec?t ^^R '^3rf^R3?I^T Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [^^f^