&€2%L" ® THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO. %h? OF 2011 PETITIONERS 1.f Han' Lal Yadav S/o Shri Parsuram Yadav, aged about 55 years. 2. Harish Chandra Yadav} Parsuram Yadav, S/o. WRIT PETITION U A 226 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA 1. Particulars of the Petitioners: n w rum» w age» s"‘v\‘\.,\.v"‘ Both are R/o Danitola Ward ‘Jalampur , Dhamtari, Tahsil, a\wey‘ x Q .439 ..-’ Q" V” 3&9 Thana and District ~ ‘Dhamtari (CG). VE R S U S / RESPONDENTS 1. The Secretary, Yatimkhana Usmaniya, Anjuman Islamiya Committee, Dha‘mtan' (CG). 2. The Chhattisgarh Rajya Waqf Board Ralpur through C E O Ralpur (CG) Sub Divisional Officer cum Assistant Survey Commissioner, Waqf , Dhamtari, District Dhamtan' (CG). 4. Revenue Inspector, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (CG). HIGH COURT OF CHI-IATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 3713 ofZOll ETITIONER : Hari Lal Yadav & Another. VERSUS RESPONDENTS The Secretary Yahmkhana Usmama Anjuman Islannya Commuee 8a Others WRIT PE I‘ITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB' Hon’ble Shn Satish K. Agnihotni J Present Shn AwadhTnpathl Advocate for the petmoners Shn Prateek Shanna, Advocate for the respondent No 2 Shn Sashank Thakur Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No 3 and 4 ' & ORDER gORALl (Passed on 13 day cfJuly, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appealing for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks pemu'ssion of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to alternative statutory forum as provided under section 83(2) ofthe Wakf Act, 1995. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side have no objection. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty, ifso advised. 5. Shri Shanna, learned counsel appearing for the Wakf Board submits that no coercive steps on the basis of the impugied order shall be taken against the petitioners for a period of 10 days from today. 6. On the request of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, certified copy of the impugied order may be returned back to the petitioners, on retaining a photocopy ofthe same. r p ‘ Stil- e it: ‘ SanshK AgmhMn Amit v, n .4 Judge P ' ‘