IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11306/2008 Decided on:23.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Rameshwar Dayal. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ansul Bansal, Addl. A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP (T) No. 6468/2008, titled Dr. Dinesh Kumar Rana versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 8.12.2010. 2. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Annexure P-1 dated 29.6.2004 is quashed and set aside. Petitioner is held entitled to a sum of Rs. 25,000/-, which has 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 been paid to him for working in hard area and the respondents are directed to release the remaining amount of Rs. 50,000/- to the petitioner within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 23.12.2010 *awasthi*