IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32341 of 2009 RAJ KUMAR SAH @ RAJ KUMAR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 5.11.2009 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner is the husband of the complainant. Case has been instituted by his so-called wife for offence under Sections 498A,323,504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner’s case is that he was abducted and forced to marry the complainant while still a minor. At the time of alleged marriage he was a student of Class X. There is no relationship of husband and wife in between the petitioner and the informant. Present case has been instituted just to put pressure on the petitioner. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioner is allowed. Let petitioner surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hazipur in connection with Sadar P.S. case No. 91 of 2009, 2 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar