IN THE HON-*BI.E HIGH COURT OE- GHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR W.P. No. tS2_/2005 PETITIONER Srnfe. Sarswati Ba i W/o Raaheshyam, age<3. abou.t 41 years, by caste Gond, K/os yillage JaFOUndha, Tah. TakhatpUE, Bistt. Bilaspur. RESPONDENTS VERSUS lf 1) -2) \-1.31^ ,....^-:^""^..s-:l"' ^ '^SM^* -..-l-!f" ^e^9a1'.,...^-:'0-7 'A^-'C'CA-"' ^ Sfea te of cSiha-btl.sga rh Through s- Department 6f Panehayat ^ and Soeial-Welfare MantFalaya, |; Ralpur Cc«0<)» ' l 1 i' Gtiief Eleetion Offieer, Bilaspur (C.Q.) The Reteuming Oftieer, Paneh^yat Takhatpiir, Oistt. Bilaspur (C.@.):. Tbe Assi.stanfc Refeurnj.ng 0£ftaer, Bilaspyr!(C.G,). II; 'fs ^!i-6y gi^sou' ^g.). : Satfce S/o Peku., agefl about 40 years, ^6) Feka S/o Sonha, aged about 42 years, . : , • ^?-) Bailu S/o'Pardeshi, aged 24|yeara, Ali • of R/o 'village -iTaEoundha, Tah. Takhatpur, sisfet. Bilasgur.: . WRIT PETITIGN, UNDER ARTIGLE 226/27'? 0P 'THE QOSTSTXTU'TION OP INDIA. .• :: •• '' ' ; • : -. - -' " ';' • PARTXGB&ARS :,OF"THE PEEJ.'EKSSBK S - £ 2) •As g.Lvan 'aBove in the cause feifeie. '^. • '' . .^;."-' •' : • ••'.'. . •' • PAraaGUI,ARS, GB.SHE RESEONElENTS:'s- AS! given above in fehe aause ,ti&Ia. ^FH^T,^' —M. •fs^ ^•l1 ^-' Soma 19.1.2005» Shri Pramod Kumar Verma,| respondents hk>.1 to 4. ;' Hearct.botlT the counset; Th^. petitioner has preferred correctness of the Qrder dated 29. flirafepjhiJn^s TSis'S^S^K i? Onamentionheingmade,ti'|etnatteristakenupfo^hearjngv SftrbMalay^Kumar Bhadufl,cj>uhseRfbrthe petitioner. Additionai Advocate Gehera! for the State/ this writ petition questioning the legality and 12,2QQ4 passed by the AssistantRBturning Officer, Takhatpur, whereby.the n(|tninatiQn fbr the post of Sarpanch of Gram Ranchayat-: Jaroundha has been r^ encroached uoon some Goyernmerlt land and alsttthat tieFisaste cerfificate has ,]3een)cance!led. ., • .. • Disputecfdacts^ar®involyed; :sehedu!ed to be held tomorrow.; junsdiction -underArticle, 226 of th in this matter and rnoreove.r, the eteetion is Therefore, at this stage, by invoking the ^ Constitution pf Inciia, interference by this ;acGording!y, dismissed, atthe admi^ at^libertytoseekreniedyavai!ableto| eonseqyently, M^W.)R;No| disposed of... ^; • • - • : . • . • .: ected on the ground that the petitidner has Coyrtjs.unwarranted. • ^ r ^"; ThB'petition istherefdre, liafcjle to be dismissed on this grpund and it is sionstage.jtsslf.However,,+h;epetitioneris ber underthe law.;..- / ^;"} '; ,:, 130/2005^ and .].A.No.33Q/20©5 sfand Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge