IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 6 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 297 OF 2009 COLVA CIVIC AND CONSUMER FORUM THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES ... Applicant Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 5 ORS., ... Respondents Shri Nigel Da Costa Frias, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Ryan Menezes, Advocate for the Intervenor. Mr. A. D. Bhobe, Advocate for respondent no. 2. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General, with Mr. A. Kamat, Additional Government Advocate for respondent nos. 1, 3 and 4. Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for respondent no. 5. Mr. M. S. Sonak, Advocate with Mr. P. Rao, Advocate for respondent no. 7. Coram:- S. J. VAZIFDAR & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 27th April, 2010 P.C. This application is nothing but an attempt to re-argue the matter. The points now raised were raised when the order dated 22.3.2010 was passed. In the circumstances the application for review is rejected. 2. If the applicant is aggrieved by the order, his remedy is to challenge the same and not to seek a review on the same grounds which were urged at the hearing. 3. On this occasion we refrain from imposing costs on the application which is found to be unsustainable. 4. Application is disposed of accordingly. S. J. VAZIFDAR, J. U. D. SALVI, J. vn