Cr Rev 754/03 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Criminal Revision Petition No.754/2003 Umrao Versus State, Sohanram & (2) Ors Date of Order ::: 14/03/08 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Sriram Yadav, for petitioner (complainant) Mr. Arun Sharma, Public Prosecutor. Instant petition has been filed by complainant against judgment dt.09/04/03 in Cr. Case No.423/2000 whereby Judl. Mag. Kotputli (Jaipur district) acquitted respondents 2 & 3 for offences U/Ss 323, 341, 448, 325/34,IPC. For an incident of 08/11/96 petitioner lodged report (FIR-262/96 against respondents 2 & 3 and challan was filed after investigation. The learned trial Judge, taking note of and appreciation of material on record including statements recorded during trial, acquitted them of offences charged vide judgment impugned. During trial, Pw9 & Pw10 were declared hostile and Pw11 was witness to the site plan but failed to prove it. As regards other prosecution witnesses, in whose statements since there were contradictions, taking note whereof while discussing prosecution evidence in the judgment impugned, learned trial Magistrate giving benefit of doubt, acquitted all the Cr Rev 754/03 //2// respondents (accused). This Court has gone through the impugned judgment of acquittal and taking note of the fact that incident is of 08/11/96 on a trivial issue, and other circumstances depicting contradictions in the prosecution evidence about genesis of the incident, does not find any manifest error being committed by courts below which may call for interference. Consequently, revision petition is hereby dismissed. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p2/754CrRev03acq.doc