IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15121 of 2007 SRI BHAGWAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4. 29.04.2009 I.A. No. 2428 of 2009 and I.A.No. 2563/09 have been filed on behalf of the interveners-respondents No. 6 & 7. In I.A. No. 2428 of 2009, it has been submitted on behalf of the interveners-respondents No. 6 & 7 that the order be passed regarding dismissal of the writ application itself as the counsel appearing for the petitioner did not serve the copy of the writ application to him in compliance of the peremptory order dated 16.03.2009. Since peremptory order has not been complied with, the writ application stood dismissed without any further reference to the Bench. No further order is required to be passed in this regard. However, counsel for the petitioner submits that he will file restoration application. I.A. No. 2563 of 2009 has been filed for allowing the counsel appearing for interveners-respondents No. 6 & 7 to make necessary correction in the Vakalatnama filed on 29.01.2008 as the C.W.J.C. No. he has not been mentioned correctly. This application is allowed. Counsel appearing for respondents No. 6 & 7 is permitted to make necessary correction. akv (Mridula Mishra, J.)