w 13(mh $m§§§g é F/aa 1/ k IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (Cg) WRIT PETITION (SI No.7w7 12006 g: /Mohan Lal Nayak, aged about 41 years, son of Shri Chandrabhanu Nayak, Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School Charbhatha, Vikas Khand Gharghora, District Raigarh (CG) PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS k State of Chhattisgarh, through — Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / The Assistant Commissioner, Deptt of ,«v Tribal Welfare, District Raigarh (CG) NSTITUTION OF 2. W§T PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CO Q w “Q , HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P, (s) No. 7007/ 2006 Pefifioner : Mohan Lal Nayak ’ Versus Respendems : Stufe of Chhu'H'isgarh and anofher- SB: Hon’ble Mr. Jus'Hce Sn'l'ish K. Agniho'tri. J Mr. AN. Bhak’m, Advacafe for fhe peWrioner. Miss Suni'ra Jain, Panel luwyar for fhe respondenfs/Sfafe. O R D E R (Passed on #his 15*“ day of December, 2006) The foliowing order of +he Cour? is passed by Swish K. Agnihofr'i, CL 1. Learned counsel appearing for 1kg pefifioner as well as [earned Panel lawyer appearing for the respondem’s/S‘rate joinfly submit “rho? fhe fac‘ls of The presenl case are similar 10 iha'l of in W. P. (S) No. 5473 of 2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sharma & ano'fher Vs. Sfa'fe of Chha'l'fisgarh & ofhers), which was disposed of vlde order dafed 9’“ October, 2006. 7 They fur‘l'her submi'r 1l1a1' fhe quesfion of law involved is also fhe same. 2. In view of fhe above sfa'red submissions made by learmd counsel for fhe parties, this petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 9*“ October, 2006 passed by ibis Com in w. P. (5) No. 5473 of 2006. ’ ‘J‘N No order as to costs. ,/ Sd/_ l Satish K. Agnihom i " Judge 1 @