IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3440 of 2008 Suresh Pradhan ..vs.. Mali Karmachari & ors ================================== CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE:20.10.2008 Heard Advocate Harkare, for petitioner and Advocate Patil for respondent no.1 and 2. Advocate Harkare contends that employment of petitioner from 2004 onwards is being disputed though there is a certificate issued by the management itself about such employment. Advocate Patil states that such certificate was given only to facilitate the admission of petitioner for B.Ed. course and management produced relevant record before the School Tribunal to show that petitioner did not work. In order to show case of petitioner that after obtaining B.Ed. qualification he again joined service in June 2004 and worked upto 1.9.2006 is false, muster of said period is also produced. School Tribunal found that the petitioner never worked with the respondent school. Advocate Harkare contends that the musters were prepared later on to suit its purpose by the management. However, there is no such effort and no such demonstration before the School Tribunal. No other material or evidence has been produced before the School Tribunal to show that petitioner continued in service after 2004 or upto 1.9.2006. In view of findings recorded by School Tribunal, which does not seem to be perverse, no interference is warranted in writ jurisdiction. Writ petition is dismissed. JUDGE smp.