AMENpgD PilZLQ/V IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT'PETITJON NO‘. 480 I 2004 Writ Petition under Article'226 of‘the'Cons‘titution of’India Particulars of the Petitioner : As'per Cause'title. Particulars of the Respondents : As per Straw-title Parmeshwar Singh, Aged about 37 years S/o Late"K.‘B. Singh R/o Mehndi Chowk, PETITIONER Torwa Bilaspur (CG) Versus Union of india X (Through :‘Secy. Ministry of Law) ‘RESPONDENT‘No.’1 New Delhi Election Commission of india (Through : Chief Election Commissioner) RESPONDENT No.2 Nirvachan Sadan, New Delhi ‘Chief‘Electrol‘Officer, Chattisgarh, RESPONDENT No.3t Raipur District Election Officer, District :‘B’ilaspur (CG) ‘ RESPONDENT No.4 South Eastern Coalfields Limited (Through :'Chairman-cum4ManagingDirector) Seepat Road RESPONDENT No.5 Bilaspur (CG) Thanwar Ram Thakur Asstt. TeaCher,‘ Nahargaon'Primary School, B.E.O. Gariabandh PO : Gariabandh RESPONDENT No.6 Dist. Ralpur (CG) ‘K.‘K. 'Singh, Labour Inspector Office of the Labou 'Officer Bilaspur (CG) RESPONDENT No.7 \ «t 3aizmmaa,§#wm@,%mmm§ Wm : Hi 200 aéwnma<g$5¥n At this stage, Mr, M1hkhopadhyaya does not press‘tha point ragardmg constitutionai validity of Stiction 159(2} (iji'j of m€ Repmseniation of the Peoplv Act} 1951. In View oftha above, tlis psfition is disposai of, having b6come mfruc‘iuous‘ Howemr, the petitior er. Wm be at lib€rty to move a frsshk petition, if hefeeis aggrieveti by his deputation on eEection duty in W’. future. f,,,,,,,# i»; / Sdl- / Sd/- . L.C_BHAD°° Judge Suni‘ Kumar 3mm Judge