IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15712 of 2009 SINDHU PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 22.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offence punishable under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is languishing in custody since 19.05.2005 and the police submitted supplementary charge sheet in the year 2006 for offence punishable under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the entire allegation is false and frivolous as the petitioner was neither arrested on the spot nor any incriminating article was recovered from his possession and in spite of that he is in custody since long. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. Let the petitioner, namely Sindhu Paswan shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No.1, Muzaffarpur in connection with Piar P.S. Case No. 03 of 2004 (S.T.No.245 of 2006). One of the bailers must be the father of petitioner who is reported to be 2 alive by learned counsel for the petitioner. harish/ ( S.N.Hussain, J)