1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3623/2007 (Dr. Himanshu Roy Vs. State & Ors.) Date of order : 18.02.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. K.K. Shah, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. In this case, the petitioner has prayed for direction to the respondent to register the name of the petitioner in the register kept for the purpose in view of Section 36 of the Rajasthan Indian Medicine Act, 1953. In para – 5 of the writ petition, it is specifically mentioned by the petitioner that “the petitioner approached respondent No.2 for registration of his name with the board in view of his qualification and registration with the State of West Bengal. The respondent No.2 refused to issue the form for the same to the petitioner on the ground that 2 there had been a large number of applications pending. However, he was informed that in due course of time he would be communicated.” Upon perusal of the aforesaid para, it is clear that still the application form for registration has not been given to the petitioner for the purpose of registration. This para made in the writ petition is supported by affidavit of the petitioner. Therefore, it cannot be disbelieved. In these circumstances, the respondent No.2 is directed to provide the application form for registration to the petitioner within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Upon supply of the said form for registration, the petitioner may fill up the form within a period of one week thereafter and submit the same before the respondent No.2. After filing the application form for registration by the petitioner, the respondent No.2 is directed to decide his matter for registration within a period of one month thereafter in accordance with the law prevailing in the State. If the application form for registration has already been supplied to the petitioner, then this order will not come in the way of the respondent No.2. The Superintendent of Police as well as other respondents authorities are directed not to allow any 3 unregistered practitioner to practise in the State because allowing these unregistered medical practitioner to practise is against the human being and society. Further, the respondents shall ensure the compliance of law and not to allow any unregistered medical practitioner having such qualification, which is not recognized in the State and decide all the pending applications for registration in accordance with the provisions of law as early as possible. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun