1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1414 /2010 (Ravindra Khandelwal vs. State of Maharashtra) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. P N Mehta, Advocate for applicant Mrs.A R Taiwade, APP for Respondent CORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED : 13 th September, 2010. Heard. 2. Learned Advocate for the applicant contended that in Prabhakar Dadaji Pal vs. State of Maharashtra reported in 2005 All MR (Cri) 739, it has been held that confessional statement made by the co-accused cannot be relied upon even to frame charge and the respondent Investigating Agency is seeking to rely upon interrogation of Driver who alleged that material was taken by Raju Khandelwal, Mazhar Khan Pathan and Om Khatri. Thus, the Investigating Agency is seeking to arrest the applicant on the basis of such statement which could not be admissible even for to frame the charge. The applicant is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigating machinery. That being so, the interim anticipatory bail granted on 3rd September, 2010 is confirmed, subject to same conditions. 2 3. Application is disposed of. JUDGE Sahare