IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 24091 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: October 26, 2010. Surinder Singh Nain ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. R.S.Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.M.Anand, Addl.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.572 dated 26.08.2009 under Sections 406/420/506/120-B and Section 27 of Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Karnal, District Karnal. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. Coordinate Bench of this Court while issuing notice of motion on 01.09.2010 passed the following order:- CRM No.M-24091 of 2010 “Crl.Misc.Nos.45685 and 42828 of 2010 Heard. Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl. Misc. No. M-24091 of 2010 Heard. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that as per the allegations contained in the FIR, the only allegation against the present petitioner is that he persuaded the complainant to invest the money in the Company known as B.K.Jewellery House Private Limited and that the Directors of that Company have already been allowed the concession of regular bail. Notice of motion for 26.10.2010. In the meanwhile, in the case of arrest of the petitioner, in the FIR mentioned in the petition, he shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the following conditions:- i) He shall join the investigation as and when required by the Investigating Officer; ii) He shall not offer any threat, promise or inducement to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the same to the Investigating Officer/Court; and iii) He shall not leave the limits of this Country without prior permission of the Court.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has already joined the investigation pursuant to said order dated 01.09.2010. It has also been stated by learned counsel for the State that petitioner has joined the investigation and that he is no more required for any custodial interrogation. 2 CRM No.M-24091 of 2010 There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of Surinder Singh Nain is accepted and order dated 01.09.2010 granting interim bail in favour of the petitioner is, hereby, made absolute subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) October 26, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 3