(£3 WW, mm, W mm (Wu) ssional Examination Board, Raip’ur, the petitioner was shown in th, waiting list prepared for Shiksha r Kaxmi Grade-III under the Scienc Learned counsel for the applied for correction of error in publication of result of Shikeha Kannj ~Grade~m and to Changa his name s that the correction has already been , A made. However, the petitioner is Lot being considered for appointment Ve Stats of Panchayat Bhawan R pur (CG) 2. The Chief xecutive OElcer, danpad Panchayat Masturi D Writ Petition under Article 2,26 of the Constitution of india 5.3. Hon’ble Shri 'Dhirendra Mishra: J. 9-2-2009 Shxi Ajay Shrivastava, coun sel for the petitioner. Ehri Pankaj Shrivastava, Pa uel Lawyar for tha State. Heaxd. Gn'svance of the petitionm RESPONDENTS l. hhattisgarh, through and W6}farc Depaztment, Secretaxy D.K,Sh 't-Bilaspur (CG) c is that he applied for the post of Shiksha Kanm" Grade-III under the Arts faculty. However, in the resuit eeciarec: by the Chhattisgarh Pro: from Science facuity to Arts faculty. , Information of Annexu're P-6 under Right to information Act wa provided to the petitioner showing facuity. p titioner submits that the peh‘tioner I i , ante anW ammm Fem Hfsam mfemh mat tWm e aimm PETITIONER Chandra Shekhar Shrivastavah S/o Kanhaiva Lal Shrivastav a, aged about 35 years R/ 0' Village Kirari (Ma: turi), District Bilaspur (CG) mmfifm ammm mmm #:2’ und€r the Alts faculty only on the conected. mm wm ground that the faculty has not bean Learned counsel for thc pet‘m'oner further submits that he is not pressing ‘rhis petition at this smge, however, the petitioner may be allowed liberty to file fresh representation before the respondent No.2 for 1edressal of his grievances wt o 1n turn may be further directed to (lemde the representatlon wrthm the specmed henod counsel for the State submits that in case the petitioner tile hesh replt Sentatjon before the respondent No.2 for redressal of his grievances; On the other hand, learned the same shall be considered and deciéed by the respondent No.2 v: ithin a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of representation. In View of the above sutmission of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is die posed of with liberty to the petitioner to tile fresh representation before the respondent No.2 for redressal of his grievances raised inthis pe :ition. On such representation being made, the respondent No.2 shal three weeks from the date of re with law. decide the same within a period of ,eipt of representation in accordance'\¥__ Sd/L ”1 it ‘ Dhirendra Mishria Judge f