^ HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGAFtH^BILASPUR PETITiONER RESPONDENTS W.P. (SlNo.7022/2009 Smt.Lata hteshram, W/o Dr. J.P. Meshram, Aged about 45 years, Working as Assistant Professor (Department of Zoology), in Government Girls College, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) R/o Prakash Kunj, Deepak Nagar, Durg (C.G.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through The Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Mantrataya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner, Directorate of Higher Education, Science College Campus, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Principal, Govemment Girts College, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) (WRrr pErmoN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) Appearance: Shri iyianish Sharma, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State on advance Copy. ORALORDER (30.11.2009) SUNIL KUMARSINHA. J. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finatty. Grievance of the petitioner in thls petilion is that de^aite the orders passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in the identical matters being W.P. No.4863/2001 and W.P. No. 1837/2009 (S) (Annexure P/9), the petitioner has not been \granted the selection grade and senior pay scale. W.P. (Sl No.7022^009 Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to the respondents/authorities that if the petitioner makes a representation detailing her grievances therein, the same shall be decided expeditiously. To this submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, leamed counsel for the respondents/State has no objection. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities concemed that if the petitloner makes a representation within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same shall be decidaJ within a further period of two months from the date of its receipt in light of the aforementioned decisions of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. — — ^ shyna Sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge