IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34469 of 2008 1. RAM BHAJAN MUKHIYA S/o- Late Nantoon Mukhiya 2. SUDAMA DEVI W/o- Ram Bhajan Mukhiya 3. CHANDESHWAR MUKHIYA S/o- Late Nantoon Mukhiya All are resident of village – Yadupatti Simari P.S. Pupari, District - Sitamarhi Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case for the offences registered under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Under Section 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted that petitioner no. 1 is Uncle, petitioner no. 2 is Aunt and petitioner no. 3 is father-in-law of the informant. It is further submitted that on perusal of the complaint, it would appear that the specific allegation of demand is against the husband of the informant not against the petitioners. Learned counsel for the state is not in a position to refute the submissions on behalf of the petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioners, named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the - 2 - satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Pupari P.S. Case No. 83 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)