IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No. 40660 of 2010 AMIT KUMAR ANAND SON OF LATE SITAPATI RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SULTANPUR, P.S.BAGHAILA,DISTRICT ROHTAS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR For the petitioner : Mr.Bindhyachal Singh For the State : Mr.Addl.P.P. ----------- 2/ 10.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is an accused of a case which has been registered for offences under Sections 306 and 494/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had married the victim lady before the Marriage Officer, Patna and out of their wedlock one female child was born but the petitioner has denied that he has ever performed another marriage with Vijya Laxmi. It has also been submitted that the petitioner’s anticipatory bail was rejected on 26.4.2010 vide annexure-1 and it was mentioned in the order that “the grounds raised by the petitioner would be relevant and could be good ground for grant of regular bail.” Considering the facts and 2 circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in Shastri Nagar (Patna) P.S.Case No.179 of 2009. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma,J.)