IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15013 of 2010 1. SACHCHIDA NAND PANDEY S/O RAM BACHAN PANDEY R/O VILL.- KARGAHAR, P.S.- KARGAHAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS …PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION (HQ.), BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION, ROHTAS, SASARAM 5. THE CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, KARGAHAR, ROHTAS 6. RAMAKANT TIWARY S/O GUDARI TIWARY R/O VILL.- KARGAHAR, P.S.- KARGAHAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS 7. SRI KANT TIWARY BOTH S/O GUDARI TIWARY R/O VILL.- KARGAHAR, P.S.- KARGAHAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS …RESPONDENTS ----------- 04. 18.01.2011 After hearing both sides and on perusal of the impugned order including the pleadings, this Court is satisfied that the matter stands concluded by finding of facts. This Court would not like to go into those aspects of the matter by percolating a thick shell of facts. There appears to be a serious dispute of title between the parties relating to the land in question. Interfering with the impugned order passed by the revisional court by invocation of extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction would not, in my view, be an appropriate exercise of jurisdiction. Petitioner may take recourse to any other forum as provided in law. The application is dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )