IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 6088 of 2008. Decided on: 19.06.2010. R.M. Singla. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. J.R. Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner seeks liberty of the Court to withdraw the present petition in order to enable him to make an appropriate representation to the Principal Secretary (IPH) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh for the redressal of his grievance. Petition is permitted to be withdrawn, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to make an appropriate representation to the Principal Secretary (IPH) within a period of four weeks from today. Thereafter, the Principal Secretary (IPH) shall go into the representation and took a decision within a further period of ten weeks. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge June 19, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?