IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1905 of 2009 1. CHHUTAN DUBEY, S/o. Raghuwir Dubey, r/o. village- Shahpur, P.S. Mohanpur, District- Gaya. 2. Manoranjan , S/o. Deosharan, r/o. village- Itawan, P.S. Haspura, District- Haspura. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 08.05.2009 Heard. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered under Section 364 I.P.C. and the allegation was that the petitioners had taken Rs.550,000/- for supplying labour in the brick kiln. The petitioners had called victim Anil Kumar for returning the money because labour was not supplied and that subsequently informant contacted the victim on mobile-phone, the victim had informed that he was with the petitioners and others but subsequently he did not return. It appears that during investigation the victim Anil Kumar came back and his statement at Annexure-2 was also recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. In that statement there are clear allegation against the petitioners and others. Vide Annexure-A to the supplementary affidavit it appears that police has submitted a preliminary charge sheet for the offences under Sections 406 & 120B/34 I.P.C. against one accused Raghubir Dubey and investigation with respect to petitioner and others 2 continues. In view of the facts and circumstances and allegations, I do not find it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Mkr. (C.M. Prasad, J.)