1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.04.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P.(MD).No.3839 of 2011 M.Thilagavathi : Petitioner Vs 1. The General Manager Karur Vysya Bank Regional Office Madurai 2. The Manager Karur Vysya Bank Palani Branch Dindigul District : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to sanction the Educational Loan to the petitioner for studying her B.Ed., Course based on the petitioner's application dated 03.01.2011. For petitioner : Mr.A.D.Ganesha Moorthy For RR 1 & 2 : Mr.Pala Ramasamy O R D E R The petitioner has approached this Court seeking for a Mandamus directing the second respondent to sanction the Educational Loan for studying her B.Ed., Course based on the petitioner's application, dated 03.01.2011. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend that she is a B.Ed., student for the year 2010 -2011. Even though she approached the Bank, she was not given the loan application itself. Therefore, she has not applied, but she made a representation, on 03.01.2011 to the second respondent Bank and there was no acknowledgement for the same. He would further contend that since the course itself has been completed this year and she seeks only for a direction to the authority to consider her application to grant of Educational Loan. 3. Notice was issued. The Bank appeared and would contend that no application was received by the Bank and the representation, dated 03.02.2011, was not at all received by the Bank, but only a letter, dated 17.3.2011 was received by the Bank and before even the letter reached the bank and was taken up for consideration, the present Writ Petition has been filed. In any view of the matter, it is only an Educational Loan application for education purpose, if the petitioner approaches the Bank with relevant documents and if he is eligible in accordance with rules, they will consider the application. 4. Heard both sides. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. The limited request of the petitioner is to consider her application for grant of Educational Loan, especially for a lady student, who has completed her B.Ed., Course, even though the representation, dated 03.01.2011 has not reached the office of the Bank and as such the Bank authorities has now stated that they are ready to consider the application provided if the petitioner is eligible in accordance with the procedure. 6. It is suffice to direct the petitioner to approach the Bank with application and all the relevant documents and seek for the Loan. On such receipt of the application, the respondents will consider the same, if the petitioner is found fit eligible and pass orders in accordance with law. 7. With the above said direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(C.S) To 1. The General Manager Karur Vysya Bank Regional Office Madurai 2. The Manager Karur Vysya Bank Palani Branch Dindigul District +1 CC to Mr.A.D.Ganeshamoorthy, Advocate, SR.No.13309 vsg W.P.(MD).No.3839 of 2011 09.04.2011 TR : 29.04.201 : 2p/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/