IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 417 of 2009 Date of Decision: 01.03.2011 Estate Officer, HUDA and another ...Appellant Versus Smt. Manjit Kaur and another ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present : Mr. Manish Bansal, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Vikas Lochab, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1. **** RANJAN GOGOI, C.J.(Oral) This appeal has been filed against the order dated 16.02.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in a proceeding registered and numbered as Civil Writ Petition No. 13351 of 2008. By the aforesaid order, the learned Single Judge after taking note of the judgments dated 06.12.2008 and 06.01.2009 rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in Civil Writ Petition No. 12126 of 2007 (Brij Lal Garg V. HUDA & Anr.) and Civil Writ Petition No. 17354 of 2007 (Ram Gopal Vs. HUDA and Anr.) had directed the appellants to dispose of the representation which was filed by the writ petitioner(s) against charging of the compound interest by the appellants. LPA No. 417 of 2009 [2] It is stated by the learned counsel for the appellants that against the judgment of this Court passed in Civil Writ Petition No. 17354 of 2007 (Ram Gopal Vs. HUDA and another) an appeal had been filed by the appellants before the Apex Court which has been allowed. The order of the learned Single Judge merely directs the appellants to dispose of the representation/claims of the writ petitioner (herein respondent No.1) in the light of the two orders of this Court referred to above. If, in the meantime, the Apex Court had reversed any of the aforesaid judgments of this Court, naturally, the appellants would be not only entitled but also duty bound to consider the writ petitioner's (herein respondent No.1) representation/claims in the light of the aforesaid order of the Apex Court. We, therefore, dispose of this appeal by directing the appellants to so act within a period of two months from today. (RANJAN GOGOI) CHIEF JUSTICE (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE 01.03.2011 'ravinder'