c^ HON'BLE HIGH PETITIONERS , ^)-^'- ^> <^..<^-''' ./•' Z&K^ ^^^' ^y^ ^/^/ ^y >^ W.P. (S) No...."?.?.?..T........2011 Ras Bihari Pradhan s/o Shri Ghasi Ram Pradhan Aged about 60 years Upper Division Teacher government Higher Secondry School Basna District Mahasainund 2 Brijraj Purohit s/o Late Shri Gadadhar Purohit 61 years Upper Division Teacher Govt Girls Higher Secondiy School Basna District Mahasaraund The State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Through - The Secretary, Tribal and welfare Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Asistant Cominissioner Tribal Department Mahasamund District Mahasaraund ( C.G.) A ailtff^T Fa.v'is ^STT3T^T^?q^i' "/ ><• d-o=l •-qi^iio'1!, ®Tl)'M<l<e,fs^TRTy .^..?..Q...^s.:..&s>^..d.. sn^i •'ffl^i'(' t^nw ^Hfta aii^i wrfcpJN •'nwit''? •fsT3ttf^rc ^sjfTOgrai SB : Hon'bie ShriJVianinara Mohan Shrivasrava,^; 2S-06-2011 finatty. sucoessfuliy completing the probation Shri Somkant Verma, counsei fj)r the petitioners. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panei Lawydlr for the State. 'vVith ihe consent of learned ojsunsei for the parties, the matter is heard T'ne petitionere were appoirjted on a fixed pay of Rs.100/-. After period of 2 yeare, they were granted regular pay scale. Learned counsel appearing fjsr the petitioners submits that the issue invoived in the case is as to whethef scale with effect from the date of probation period. 'he issue invoived herein wa^ Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in <p.A.No.2745/8S {Madhukant Yadu and S6 omers 14 Srate ofM.F. 8, others), \) teachers are entitled to regular pa^| appointment. The matter was taken Leave Petition i'Civil'i No.6892/93. Tht Supreme Coun, uphoiding the deoi 'eachers/Assistant Teachers are en Court, while considering the same is , the petitioners are entitied to reguiar pay initial appointment or after completion of considered by the Madhya Pradesh State ^herein, it was heid that thesimilarly situated scale with effeot from the date of iniiiai pp to the Horfble Supreme Court in special said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble sion of the Tribunal to the effect that the ijtled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. Learned counsel appearing ^r t'ne petitioners further submfts that this feue in Amar Sa< Ram & Others v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others [yv.P.(S) N|3.4725/2006] by order dated 01/09/2006, aliowed the petitioners to make a ijepresentation within a period of ten days, raising aii their grievanoes and in tun|i, the concerned respondent was direoted to XI-HC—78 sn^i w h4<^ g<n aniOT wiw uyepu 3^1 F, y^l-MT^, f^TFFT'y ..'^?.f..©...l^;...'3.a'AA/Jl W^T '^V (^i^<tl) TOireiTnf^iaiT^i -? represent^tion decide the representation in an the date of receipt of the represent^ Accordingly, tne petitioner^ raising aii their grievanoes, in iigi-p 27/12/2008 (Annexure P/5), and i^ decide the representation, if any, i| a period ofthree months from the| verification ofthe facts. in view oft'ne foregoing, thi^ ofc|jective manner within a period of 30 days from gli Itl 'nltid^i-t W:f?Tf 'if fS'3': Tfs(!5TT ^i.3ifCT31lt?T are granted liberty to make a representation ^ of the aforesaid judgment and circuiar dated turn, t'ne concerned respondent is directed to accordance with law, on iis own merits, within |date of receipt of the representaiion, subject to 4 petition js finally disposed of. • Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge