\. 'vy./ -.:'^»taA^G-78 [^yy sn*?i qn R-ii'* ?I^TT SH^T Sh+licft ^ST -*<wiv\<i, w^ww, ?^<fwy. NIKdl **li* ••••W^.^<9>....g.^c^.^200 ^ sn^r 'TSRi' (lcif'i«<'it:T) TRiiwnftg 3nt?i PETITiONER: -VSR RESPONDENTS: Sinale Bench: Hon'ifr 3-2-2008:- forthe Shri B.D. Guru, counsel Miss Sunita Jain, Panel Law( Heard. <»)i<4l<n<^iiTTq^ff ^f f^st' <.P>l'^Pr ^aifipTsn^r us- Amrit Kumar Kerketta, S/o Francis Kerketts, Aged about 36 years, Presentiy posted and working as Sub Inspector, City Kotwali, Korba, District Korba (CG) State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretar/, Department of Home Affairs, D.K.S. Buiiding, Mantraiay, Director General of Police, Police Headquarters, Raipur (CG) Inspector General of Police, Baster Range, Bastar (CG) Assistant Inspector General <tf Police (Personnel), Poiice Headquartsrs, Raipur (CG) Superintendent of Police, District Bastar, Jagdalpur (CG) Superintendent of Police, Police, District Narayanpur, District Jagdalpur (CG) Superintendent of Police, District Korba (CG) e Shri Dhirendra Mishra, J. petltioner. er for the Siate/respondents. XI-HE—78 "3^ •<iiqi<?i-4, ®ti1y-i|s,fsf^iy^ *11*<CTI tb*<|ch """"""""""•""""""•""•"^200 31I^?T 'tT5W (1c<ll°<'i.'ET) sn^i w R-< TTSTT STI^^RT^ t^nw^fs^an^r '^ Grievance of the petitioner Inspector Generat of Poiice, Basta| petitioner out of tojrn promotion due Assistant Inspector General of Poli( impugned order of Annexure-P/1 di Departmental Promotion Committeet, out ofturn promotion. Learned counsel for the petit no reason has been assigned for n superior authorities. The petitionerj Annexure-P/10 before the Directorl back on 23-9-2004, however, the sahie Learned counsel for the Sta) petitioner files fresh rspresentation order of Annexure-P/1 before respcjndent and decided by the said authority vj receipt of representation. in view of the submissions instant petition is disposed of wf representation aiong with copy of Vi\i period of 10 days frorri today.who i(i period of 8 weeks from the date 4< Consequently, alt the pendin shi*i[<-i<fli *iw^i "if f^i^) <?flf^.l<. ^aifinaii^r js that the Superintendent of Police and (• Range had recommended to grant the |o his exceptional performance. However, )e (Personnel), Police Headquarter, by the |ed 1-7-2004, on the basis of report of the heid that the petiUoner is not entitled for |oner submitted that in the impugned order jecting the recommendations made by the |has already submitted representation vide IGeneral of Poiice, respondent No.2, way has not been considered ti!l date. te/respondents submitted that in case the |atong with copy of the petiSon against the No.2, the same shall be considered ithin a period of 8 weeks from the date of ntade by leaned counsel for the parties, the th liberty to the petitioner to file fresh is petition before respondent No.2 within a tum shail decide the same within a further receipt of representation, in accordance apptications also stand disposed ^_^.._-— "sd/- .._. ^endraMisbra judge ^V6^-<- >