IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVIEW No.106 of 2011 CHANDRASHEKHAR SAHA, THE PRINCIPAL, M.V. COLLEGE, BUXAR, P.S. BUXAR (T), DISTRICT- BUXAR ;---PETITIONER. Versus 1.BHARAT NARAIN MISHRA, S/P- LATE MAHARASHI KHAKI BABA, R/O- MOHALLA- KHAKI BABA HATA, CHARITRAVAN, BUXAR, P.S. BUXAR (T), DISTT- BUXAR. 2. THE STATE OF BIHAR 3. THE COLLECTOR, BUXAR. 4. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BUXAR. 5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BUXAR 6. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, BUXAR, DISTRICT- BUXAR. :RESPONDENT 1ST SET 7. BHAGWAT DUBEY, SON OF LATE RAM SHARAN DUBEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PURAINIYAN, P.S. SIKARAUL, DISTRICT- BUXAR, POOJARI OF TEMPLE, RAM JANKI TEMPLE. 8. PAWAN KUMAR DUBEY, SON OF LATE SHEO NARAIN DUBEY, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA CHINI MILL, BUXAR, P.S. BUXAR (T), POOJARI OF RAM SATI MANDIR. 9. TAPESHWAR CHOUBEY, SON OF NAND JEE CHOUBEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SAWAN BAHAR, P.S.- ITARHI, DISTRICT- BUXAR (TENANT). :--RESPONDENTS 2ND SET. 10. VEER KUWAR SINGH UNIVERSITY, ARA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR. 11. VICE CHANCELLOR, VEER KUWAR SINGH UNIVERSITY, ARA:--RESPONDENTS 3RD SET. ----------- For the petitioner :- Mr. S.S. Dwivedi, Senior Advocate. Mr. M.K.Sinha, Advocate. For the O.P. :- Mrs. M. Chatterjee, Advocate. For the University:- Mr. Sunil Kumar Mandal, Advocate. ====== 4. 21.06.2011. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Respondent No. 6 in C.W.J.C.No. 3844 of 2006 has chosen to seek review of the order dated 04.03.2011 passed in the said petition, whereunder this Court having considered the submission made by the parties as also having noticed the fact that Respondent No. 6 though had appeared through Vakalatnama in the writ case, his counsel chose not to appear on 04.03.2011 the date on which this Court having heard counsel in attendance proceeded to set aside the order passed by the Sub- Divisional Officer, Buxar dated 14.02.2006, whereunder the writ petitioner was dispossessed from his residential house. Aforesaid order dated 14.02.2006 was passed 2 ignoring the Khatiyan entries dated 31.03.2000, Annexure- 3 to the writ petition prepared by the Buxar Municipality. Review is being sought on the ground that order dated 04.03.2011, Annexure-1 has been passed after being impressed by the fact that the title suit challenging the Khatiyan entries has been dismissed for default although said fact is not correct as the title suit stood restored as would appear from order dated 28.02.2011, Annexure-9 to the review petition. 3. Counsel for the writ petitioner states that she was not aware about the order dated 28.2.2011 when this Court proceeded to pass the order dated 4.3.2011. 4. Aforesaid order dated 04.03.2011 has been passed setting aside the order dated 14.02.2006 as thereunder the writ petitioner was dispossessed from his residential house by the Civil authorities Sub-Divisional Officer, Buxar who does not have any such jurisdiction. In such view of the matter, I am not inclined to entertain this review petition, which is dismissed, however, with observation that the order of this Court dated 04.03.2011 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 3844 of 2006, Annexure-1 shall be subject to the final orders passed in the said title suit. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)