IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38786 of 2010 SHIVESH KUMAR Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 13.12.2010 Some mistake has been committed while typing the observation dictated in the paragraph no.2 of the order dated 29.11.2010. So, the paragraph no.2 of the order dated 29.11.2010 is substituted by the following observations:- “Agreement or transaction was for the Company, it is said that on assurance of this petitioner but cheques were not issued by this petitioner rather by the co-accused who was entrusted with the same. Moreover, when liability is accepted by anyone and issued cheque is bounced, a simple case under Section 138 of the N.I. Act is made out”. Accordingly, the order dated 29.11.2010 is modified to the extent above. Let the order be communicated to the trial court through Fax at the cost of the petitioner in connection with Complaint Case No. 1257C of 2006 in the Court of C.J.M., Saharsa. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)