IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. ORDER S.B. CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.152/2006 Smt. Ghoti Devi Vs. Radheyshyam & Anr. 05.05.2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Shri J.R. Tantia, for the petitioner. Shri Gaurav Gupta, for the respondent. The petitioner has preferred this revision petition against the impugned order dated 2.8.2006 by which the objections filed against the attachment of the property under order 21 rule 58 C.P.C. by the petitioner have been dismissed as the petitioner failed to lead evidence in support of her objections. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 decree- holder has submitted that in view of the specific provisions of sub rule 4 of rule58 of order 21 rule C.P.C. an appeal is provided against the order impugned as the same amounts to a decree. In the light of the above objections the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this revision petition to enable the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned order. The prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed. This revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to prefer an appeal in accordance with law. The Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order to the learned counsel for the petitioner for filing of the appeal after retaining the photostat copy of the same on record. The interim order dated 12.9.2006 stands vacated. (DALIP SINGH),J. Ramchandrkhatri,PS