an^iw Ri-fi'i) 'tTOT 3II^f *41 -¥+ '?ET '^wi'Y\<i, y^wie, hwvy. ^^P...^^.M... sn^i TI^T ('i°i!sslltr) CWlsR^f^q <tll^?l ?f;?Nt HON'BLE SHRI DHIRENDRA Versus 2. 3. 4. Mayad^s, son of Sukratdas Panika, aged about f7 yeare, resident of village Bl-iojpur, presenjly resident of Navrangpur, ! Tah: Saran^rh, district Raigarh (CG) State Reven |3f Chhattisgarh, through Secretary,, Department, Raipur (CG) Collecttsr, Raigarh (CG) Tahsilc^r, Sarangarh, Dist. Raigarh (CG) Laldasjson of Nanki, caste Panika, resident of Bhcjjpur, Viltage Kotwar, Bhojpur, Tah: Saran^arh, dist. Raigarh (CG) Smt. Anju Ahuja, learned couj Shri ShashankThakur, learn^d Shri Roshan Dubey, learned Heard. Learned coynsel for the petit| the order of concerned Tehsildar fo| Sub Divisional Offieer (Revenue), Sa| of with a direction to the concernet <?)1^<Tf^n *1W<ril ^ T^^T ^II^I^R ^sffiiHsiii^T ISHRA, J sel for the petitioner. PL for the State. ;ounsei for respondent No.4. oner submits that the petitioner's appeal against the similar relief is already pending before the •angarh; Therefore, this petitiori may be disposed SDO to decide the appeal within a specifled Learned counsel for the res|}ondents/State has no objection if the petftion is disposed of with the aforesaid direoti) In that view of the matter, th^ the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenj preferred by the petitioner/appellantf from the date of receipt of copy of thi[ n. instant petition is disposed of with a direction to e), Sarangarh to decide the revenue appeal ide Annexure R/2, within a period of eight weeks order in accordance with law. Sd/- Dlkirendra Mishra ' Judge l»iiu«njififw iiii»ii<-ui<i»i-]i<;'ii«i— FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.