HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23783 of 2009 Date: 19.09.2011 Between: M.Rajeshwari ..... Petitioner AND: Government of A.P., Reptd by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration, Hyderabad And ten others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri C.V.V.Prasad For Sri P.R.Prasad Counsel for Respondent No.1: AGP for Municipal Administration Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3: Sri C.Damodar Reddy, Standing Counsel for GHMC Counsel for respondent No.4: Sri M.Dhananjay Reddy, Standing Counsel for HMDA Counsel for respondent No.7: Sri P.Rajasekhar Counsel for respondent Nos.8 to 11: ---- The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed with the grievance that despite several illegalities committed by respondent Nos.7 to 11 in construction of buildings over land in Sy.No.158, in pursuance of the sanctioned layout dated 27.10.1999, respondent Nos.1 to 4 have not been taking any action. At the hearing, Sri C.V.V.Prasad, learned counsel representing Sri P.R.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, placed before the Court letter No.10331/B5/Plg/HMDA/2009, dated 25.06.2011, of the Metropolitan Commissioner of respondent No.4-Corporation cancelling the layout. A perusal of the said letter shows that following cancellation of the layout, the Metropolitan Commissioner requested the Deputy Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, L.B.Nagar, to take appropriate action as per law in respect of the constructions in Sy.No.158 of Sahebnagar Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Having regard to this subsequent event, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. It is needless to observe that respondent Nos.5 to 11 shall be free to question the above-mentioned proceedings of the Metropolitan Commissioner cancelling the layout by availing appropriate remedy in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.Nos. 30895 and 30896 of 2009, 22201 of 2010 and 7873 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim reliefs are disposed of as infructuous and W.V.M.P.(SR).No.91623 of 2010 filed by the proposed impleaded respondents is dismissed as infructuous. ______________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 19th September 2011 DR