1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6435/2008 Hanuman adopted son of Dev Karan Versus Civil Judge (J.D.), Dudu & Others Date of Order :: 29th July, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. B.M. Gurjar for the petitioner BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This writ petition on behalf of plaintiff is directed against the impugned order dated 20th February, 2008 passed by the trial court, wherein an application under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC filed on behalf of defendant no.2/4 for setting aside the ex-parte order has been allowed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial court has committed an illegality in not assigning any cogent reason for allowing the application for condonation of delay of about three years in filing the application. 4. I have considered the submissions of 2 learned counsel for the petitioner in the light of reasons assigned by the trial court for allowing the application and after considering the same, I find that the trial court has observed that it is the settled principle of law that every person should be given an opportunity of hearing, so the matter can be disposed of on merits. The trial court allowed the application in the interest of justice. I do not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK