IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26489 of 2011 Jyotish Kumar Rajak, Son of Shri Darath Pd. Rajak, Resident of Village Babuchak, P.S. Jhajha, District Jamui. ---------- Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar. -------- Opposite Party -------------- 02/- 30/08/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act, is named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. Submission is that petitioner intends to resume and continue the matrimonial relationship with the complainant, who is his one and only wife residing at her parents place with the only son of the couple. It is further, submitted that, there is one case bearing Maintenance Case No. 61(M)/2010, under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, pending before Principal Judge, Family Court, Munger, wherein, an order was passed against the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 2,000/- per month to the complainant by way of ad interim maintenance, which has been regularly paying to the complainant and there is no amount due till date. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two 2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Munger, in connection with Complaint Case No. 690 C of 2010, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation or even on single default in payment (as ordered earlier), the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)