IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.909 of 2009 ANAND PANDEY @ DEEPAK S/O LATE SHRI RAM PANDEY, RESIDENT OF M.I.G. 78, ADITYAPUR-2, JAMSHEDPUR, PIN-831 013 (Jharkhand). -PETITIONER Versus DR.NIVA TRIVEDI @ NIVA PANDEY WIFE OF ANAND PANDEY, DAUGHTER OF SHRI TRIBHUVAN TRIVEDI, RESIDING AT ANNUPRANIKA, KAUTILYA NAGAR (BEHIND IGIMS, MAIN ROAD), A.G.COLONY, PATNA. -OPPOSITE PARTY _____ For the Petitioner: Mr. Chandra Shekhar Singh 3 22.01.2010 After some argument Mr. Chandra Shekhar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this Civil Revision in view of the provision as contained in Section 19(5) of the Family Court Act, 1984 and its interpretation by a Division Bench of this Court in Jagdish Prasad Chouhan V. Bhuneshwar Chouhan & Anr., 2009 (3) PLJR 931, holding that forum of Civil Revision would not be available against any interim / interlocutory orders passed by Family Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw this Civil Revision to avail any other 2 remedy if available under law. In above view of the matter, this Civil Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) AAhmad