IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 4589 of 2011 Decided on 17.6.2011. Madhubala …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and ors. …..Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice (oral). The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:- “i) That the oral termination dated 9.9.08 issued by respondent No.3 may kindly be quashed with all consequential benefits while issuing the writ of Certiorari. ii) That the petitioner may kindly be allowed to work as PTA teacher as per grant-in-aid rules while issuing the writ in the nature of mandamus and the petitioner may kindly be paid grant-in-aid w.e.f. April, 2007 or any other order which may deem fit be passed in the interest of justice.” 2. It is for the petitioner to point out his grievances before the second respondent, in which case second respondent will look into the matter and take appropriate decision in accordance with law, justice and equity within another one month. 2 While taking decision, as above, submission of the petitioner that the post is still lying vacant, shall also be taken into consideration. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the second respondent. 3. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Sharma) Judge. June 17, 2011 (LSP/pankaj)