IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18169 of 2010 KAMAL MANJHI, Son of Budhu Manjhi @ Sahdeo Manjhi, resident of Village- Pakar Mushari, P.S. Telmer, District-Nalanda........Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR.........................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 27.05.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion of the bail petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail in connection with a case registered under Sections 364(A)/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that initially charge sheeted accused have been acquitted vide Sessions Trial No. 329 of 2004 and 910 of 2006. Subsequently charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner hence he could not appear but now he is in jail since 15.06.2009. The petitioner further undertakes to appear on regular basis during the trial. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner for the purposes of bail only, let the petitioner, 2 Kamal Manjhi, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. I, Biharshariff, Nalanda, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 619 of 2009 arising out of Harnaut P.S. Case No. 22 of 2004. If the petitioner fails to appear on three consecutive dates during trial the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)