1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No. 573 of 2010 [Sunita Madhukar Meshram Vs. Union of India & others] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. O.D. Kakde, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Mishra, Asstt. Solicitor General for Respondent No.1. Mr. Shyam Ahirkar, Adv., for respondent no.2. ---- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATE : 31st January, 2011. 1. Petitioner has challenged seizure of her alleged ancestral house by the respondents on the ground that it is without authority of law. 2. In contrast, the respondents assert that inspite of notice, the petitioner failed to co-operate for conducting the search, and in order to prevent destruction of evidence, it was necessary to seal the house. 3. Heard. 4. Even before this Court, petitioner had promised for attending the search proceedings on 2 27th January, 2011, however, on said date, which was suggested by the petitioner, she had failed to come at the location for assisting the search. 5. Learned Adv. Mr. O.D. Kakde for the petitioner states that because the petitioner had suffered an injury due to fall, she was unable to travel, and he would be satisfied if the respondents proceed in accordance with law. 6. In so far as various other questions raised in the petition are concerned, those involve disputed questions of facts, and considering the approach of the petitioner, we do not propose to grant any indulgence. 7. Petition is accordingly disposed of. 8. Disposal of this petition shall not take away the petitioner s right in law in the event the seizure is otherwise contrary to law. Judge Judge |Hedau|