•^ -'Iz ^p;o< IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPNQ. '2-3'^2—/2003 / PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS ^J^ ^•' ./•"^^7 ^•\^"€)>-" ^ .••' t^" •* •o ^yv ry ,iC ^"^ J. B. Sinha, S/o Late Shri Mahanandan Prasad Sinha, Aged about 60 years, Ex-Accountant, Janpad Panchayat, Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, R/o Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh,(C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). The Collector, District Raigarh, Raigarh, (C.G.). Zila Panchayat, Raigarh, Through : The Chief Executive Officer, Raigarh, (C.G.j. Janpad Panchayat, Dharainjaigarh, Through ; The Chief Executive Officer, Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, (C.G.). y ^) -;^ 5. Kariyam Sidar, Peon, Janpad Panchayat Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICI^ 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS / CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION / ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. xt.HG.as vss a^iw ^ 3[|t» : ?^n^ w^ i:X l! '! '/._.••.•^..:"..:- -^. ...:..B::rL..'^^':'^^'..^_:.:_^. ;^'SVt -fswssff'seass^^ssyyt m. NIWtl WNW C^PMQ .•2-3:?2-/a '"W(. 206 29.8.2003 Petitionerby Ku. Pooja Slate by Shri Ranbir Sia Heanl, 3y this petition under ludia the, petitioner has laised has uot passed.aay oider re^ petitioner despite the fact tt executive council as well as fh service of fhe respoudent NG Respondent N0.4 that is why ^iukla, Advocate. feh, Govt, AdvoCate. justified. Not extendiag of fhe] Articles 14, 16 and. 21 ofttieC^ At the relevaut time the Jaapad Pa&chayat, Dhaniyaigj 30tb Noveniber, 2QOO. Jaapail| oftheservice ofthe petitioner efEect b-ut fhfi prcscribed auj extended fhe beaefit to the and Bialafide. It; h^s been. pray^ ia. the aature ofjmandanuis issued tb give' saSary fo thfi p| retu-ement i.e. 130.11.2QOO superannuatiaa fix>ia 58 years' 1 have heard leamed <<il«i?l41'<TINHf < 1%'!^ '(&R^R ^ sSss ai^sr WiS {Yrticle 226/ 227 of the Constitution of [the grievaace tliat fhe Respondent No,4 ;^anlm.g extension of the service of the tt^.t the resolution. was passed by the standing couucil. Wheieas the term of .5 was extendediby the order of fhe t}ie action oftheRespondentN6.4in not service of fhe petitioner is violati.ye o£ tinstitution. jlietitionerwasworbingas Accountant in i ^rh. He attained -fbe age of 58,:years'o;u3" [Pauchayat recommended for extelisioni^ ^nd resolution was passed twice ta •fius^ | piority i.e. Respondent No.4 ha^ Hof j pet{tioner, therefore fhejactioa .is'ariMitraI^li^ ^d ;that appiopriate writ, oi^er, iduectioii;; ] [comuianding the respoudent' l^;l'!,l3ie!;1i ttitioner for two years fix)m ttie ,djajte^o|!.R dfi the | 'basis •of ' exteusioDg •|^E|^e:ji|:<af|!::; ^>;60 ypara..: : ^ : '•:'''K!'!l:i^.}|5 cou|isel foi fhe parties. 1 m Kvl MB®^ il ll^^l^) EUBUH ;Jluitl^E BilSilf:] •iii :/^\ :c- ifc s-m •«(Hflffl<»,•^wi'wis ss°ga ^wi'SSt s::iiiaa ;1-9:!IMI ^ ^^,2-S^%p;§'t.^'?'"..: 'BS^I>i5E%%"''""'m"""""'"'?w""'"'^^388Q(. eptio|ial Iri this connectiou Uil (RecruitineD.t arid General laysdown fhat fhe age ofsv^ other. than teachiag stafir ad For teaGhiiig staff aad classl shall be 60 yeara. lu exc( prescribed .antfaority Paachaj ofaiiy ofits employee for m4 inatter no pemiission is gra4 merely passiag df the resolutf the petitioner does not give 58 yearsiup fo GO years. Ranchayat has t6 show tiie r{ exceptional for extensiQU. ia | Eoes fo show that the Pat petitioner as aa exceptiQnal c{ by the prescribed aufh.ority, entitled for exteitsiou in servB Ittview offhe above I c( The saiaelis witbout fopse, wlt radted a?ty tBK&t'itt-ttlNsit't'SBS'^fa^R < ^siRgw^i^t '';-,'.; "H t .relfivanf Rute is 33 of thfi PaD.ehayat; Cjoiuiitious of Service} Riiles. 1999 whioh Eljeraiuiuatfon for the Panchayat eiaployees j^l class IV emplDyees, shall be 58 .years. [IV emptoyees tfae age of supeiaiiuuatioii cases with the pnorperinission'of.tlie |at can extend fhe age of superaim.uatio.H (xim.um period of two years. Siace ia tius by the prescribed authority ttierefoie ^ou by the Janpad Panchayat ia favoul' o right to the petitioner to continue a&^r |To make out an excepfenal case fbie taspns how ttte petitionei^s case beGQiHe|s tervice. There.is nothing on recoidwhusN. ajichayat recoiiuneDded tlle case of ffle; fase and since no perimssioa was grauite)ii| |herefore as ofright-fhe petitioner is ji<||| Qot fnid any sufostaace in ffais tich is liabte to be arid is dismissed. -Sdf-- L.C. Bhadoo Judge 'ahchi ni a'g