IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14065 of 2009 1. MOHARAM MIYAN 2. GIRGIT MIAYAN ---- Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is land dispute in between the parties. There are several litigations. Most of them have been filed on behalf of the petitioners party for the act committed by informant’s party and adopting pressurize tactics this case with super added allegation has been lodged in which petitioners are apprehending their arrest. In the suggested facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Ram Nagar P.S.Case No.22 of 2009, the above named two petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like - 2 - amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI