1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21/10/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN W.P.(MD) No.12163 of 2011 R.Suresh Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Trichy City Corporation, Trichy. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Trichy City Corporation, Trichy. ... Respondents Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to survey the petitioner's property in T.S.No.26 based on the petitioner's application dated 26.08.2011. For petitioner .. Mr.M.Sridharan For respondents .. Mr.B.Pugalenthi, Special Government Pleader ORDER The petitioner has come up with the above writ petition seeking for a mandamus to direct the respondents to survey his property. 2.Heard Mr.M.Sridharan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr.B.Pugalenthi, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. 3.Considering the limited nature of the grievance with which the petitioner has come up, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to conduct the survey of the property of the petitioner, if the property in question actually belongs to the petitioner and thereafter, earmark the same. The above said exercises shall be carried out within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. But it is made clear that the respondents shall ensure that there is no dispute with regard to the property before they conduct the survey. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (C.S) To 1.The Commissioner, Trichy City Corporation, Trichy. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Trichy City Corporation, Trichy. W.P.(MD) No.12163 of 2011 21.10.2011 gcg/RJ/8.11.11/(1p/3c) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/