1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 2331 OF 2010. ( Pradeep Vithalrao Pandhare and others -: versus :- The Collector and another ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JULY 12, 2010. Heard Shri S.P. Palshikar, learned counsel for petitioners, learned A.G.P. for respondent no.1, Shri S.C. Mehadia, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and Shri G.E.Moharir, learned counsel for respondent no.3. Shri Mehadia, learned counsel has pointed out that work in field of petitioner [as claimed] is already over. There was earlier Writ Petition No.48/2010 filed by him and in that Writ Petition present respondent no.1 pointed out that one Bharat Mahadeo Nagpure has moved the Tahsildar, Bhadrawati for compensation and that compensation was paid to him. 2 Filing of that Writ Petition is not in dispute before this Court. Said Bharat Mahadeo Nagpure is not joined as party respondent in this Writ Petition. It is thus apparent that the dispute is of apportionment of compensation or entitlement therefor between petitioner and said Bharat Nagpure. Present Writ Petition is therefore misconceived, the same is dismissed, with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rgd.