IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2010 / 4TH ASHADHA 1932 RP.No. 564 of 2010(Y) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.19105/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): 6TH RESPONDENTS IN WPC -------------------------------------------- A.WILSON, S/O.AUGUSTINE, PADINJIATTATHIL HOUSE, KANJIRACODE, KUNDARA PO, KOLLAM DISTRICT. (WORKING AS SECRETARY, KOTTARAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PULAMON PO, KOLLAM DISTRICT) BY ADV. SRI.C.J.JOY SMT.SHOBA NAIR RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS & RESPONDENTS IN WPC ----------------------------------------------- 1. KIZHAKKEKKARA RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT C.JOSEKUTTY, KOTTARAKKARA , PULAMON, KOTTARAKKARA. 2. SHOP OWNERS ASSOCIATION,PULAMON, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY N.A.MAJEED, PULAMON, KOTTARAKKARA. 3. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KOTTARAKKARA 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 6. THE SECRETARY, POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, ERNAKULAM. 7. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, KOLLAM. ADV.YOUSEFF, ADV.AYSHA ADV.M.K.CHANDRA MOHAN DAS, SC. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.P.NARAYANAN ADV.V.V.NANGAGOPAL NAMBIAR, SC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== R.P.No. 564 of 2010 in W.P.(C).No. 19105/2008 ================== Dated this the 25th day of June, 2010 O R D E R This is an application filed by the 6th respondent in the writ petition seeking review of my order dated 11.6.2010, whereby on account of his failure to respond to the notice issued to him, I directed him to appear in person. I am not at all happy with the conduct of the 6th respondent. I feel that this is the result of lack of respect for the Court. Although the 6th respondent is personally present and personally apologises for his conduct, I feel that for allowing this review petition the 6th respondent should pay nominal costs. Accordingly, the review petition is allowed and the personal appearance of the 6th respondent is dispensed with on condition that he pays an amount of Rs.1,500/- as nominal costs to the Kerala Mediation Centre within one week and produces proof of payment of the same, failing which, the review petition would stand dismissed. The said costs shall not be debited to the account of the Panchayat and it shall be recovered from the salary of the Secretary. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2