THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6096 of 2011 Date:11.03.2011 Between: S. Venkata Ramaiah ..... Petitioner AND The District Collector, Prakasam, Ongole and others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri I. Koti Reddy Counsel for Respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent No.1 in passing orders on stay application in the revision filed by the petitioner before it against the orders dated 23.08.2010 and 10.02.2011 of respondent Nos.3 and 2 respectively. It is not the pleaded case of the petitioner that during the pendency of the appeal before respondent No.2, the order of respondent No.3 cancelling the petitioner’s fair price shop authorization was stayed. As a result, the cancellation order has come into effect during the pendency of the appeal. At the hearing, Sri I. Koti Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, has admitted this position. Being unsuccessful in appeal, the petitioner cannot be expected to be in a better position than what he was during the pendency of the appeal. In the premises as above, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.1 to dispose of the revision petition pending before him within a period of two months from today, after giving notice to the petitioner. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.7600 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 11th March, 2011 GHN