n"ir»~';o: 'f'a'i'a'm'r' <r»s* /"> >-^ B; -!.:; v, ContemBt CasejC;(H0.2-t<>(- /2011 aji'Ei:?t'T''31''gi^le'"fe'ii@' B'I*ELS t.i'Kspnwiiip.wt' (Conteiiinors j /^., ^K/' .^zv ^/y/^/' ^/^" ^. BETWEEN The Commissioner Mufiicipal Corporation, Amblk(ipur, District-Surguja (C.G.) , 1. Santosh Gupta S/o late Mewa Lal, aged about 26 Years, occupation. Chicken Seller, R/o Mayapur, Ambikapur Distt. Sarguja (C.&.) . ' . • 2. Shivnath Gupta ,S/o'Shri Jhyri Sao aged about 50 Years, R/o Thangaripara, Ambikapur Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) 3. Raje.sh Soni ,S/p Shri Baijnath Soiii aged 45 Years, R/o Mayapur, Arnbikapur Distt. Sai-guja (G.G.) 4. Mohd..Ghulam Mustafa, S/o Shri Mohd Samsuddia aged about 62 Years, R/o Mominpura (Parradand) Ambikapur Distt. ' Sarguja (C.G.) .' . 5. MunnawarQurashi ,S/o ShriKamruddin Qurashi about 45 Years, R/o. Mayapur, Arabikapur Distt. Safguja(C..G.j : 6; Mohd. Jabbar Qurashi, S/o Shri Mohd. Siddique Qurashi aged about 60 Years, R/o Mayapyr, Ambikapyr Distt.Sarguja .7. Anwar Qurashi, S/o Shri Sohrab Qurashi aged about 35 Years, R/o Mayapur, Ambikapur Distt.Sarguja (C.G.) stition: uadi&T.articls^lS of'coastitutioa of Seet|oB_12_of^|ieJ3®atem,ptof'the Courts .,&-. 'u ss&yy ' ./• ~:^ ^3 'a€./^: XI-HG—78 sn^i ^[R;-<1=b '^n'3n^?T ^rih; ^5^ ^WW-f., •3-^Wt'c, f5RTCiy *ll*icil (hll^ .<W:,..6^..^..[OM^'^) sn^i 'CPRT (lcifl«i<t() '^llW'dfet an^l chl<l[ci<iH "WRTf^ fe^ ^R^R ^aiRmaii^r 15.07-2011 Smt. Hamisia Siddiqui, coijinsel for She petitioner in contempt case (C) No.214/2011. Shri Bhupendra Singh, co^insel for the petitioner in contempt case {W No.217/2011. i The aforesaid two conte^ipt petitions are being disposed on by this common oraer. in a writ petition filed by th an Interim order was passed oih 1/7/^un, directinfl mat tne srarus guo in respect of the shop in question be maintained till the next dat^ of hearin.q. The petitioners in Contempt Case (C)'No.214/2011 allege ijiat on 1/07/2011, theywere running their shops in Gudari Bazar and aft^r the Interim order was passed, they nave been removed and the Corporat in contemDt Detition No.2 Drive and on 1 /7/201 1 thev wer^ the interlm order was Dassed, tr| ^ petitioners in contempt petition N0.214/11, n the petition, as obtains on that day.shal |on has iocKed the snops. 7/2011, the Corporation has come out with a case for initiatina contempt priiceedings against the wrlt petitioners on the submission that the writ petition^rs have aiready shifted thelr shops to Mann runnina their shops in Marin Drive and after ev shifted their shops back to Gudari Bazar. hererore, there is vioiation or' irtterim order passed bythis Court and in that refiard, notices v/ere also sent t$ shift their shoos to Marin Drive. the contemnors on 6/7/11 and 8/07/2011 to ••(*'- ..^ ^yr -t~ .T.EY .^l^.,.*<*^A^l XI-HG—78 STf^T W fii'fi* WII SII^T *M ue&pt; .»k.>: +- *(1*<MI th*<l<h ~?5[ '*ii^i<n<i, ©ttiy'i'c,fq<niyy ^...c^,.^.^..^^^ •^,200 311^1 •q^T (^fggf^i) 'roiret"nfei siA?i 3. Consider'sng that in the wrii present, I am nof inciined to en petitioners (both In the contempt t^f<il<n<ftn -ETTR?Tf ^f t^st' ^^l< ^; aifin snia petition, interim oraer has been passed 1/7/201i and the Corporation rfes not yet riied its repiy in the matter, ilertain these two contempt petitions. T Ipetitions) are at liberty to move appropria aRDlication In the pending writ rietitions. The parties are however grant liberty to revive their contempt p^titions, if exigency so arises. The contem case (c) No.214/2011 and contjempt case (c) N0.217/2011 are therefo finaily disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge t!.