IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27890 of 2011 ====== 1. Musmat Ramkali Kunwar @ Ramkali Devi, W/o – Late Chandradeo Ojha. 2. Kapildeo Ojha @ Apil Ojha @ Kapil Ojha, son of late Chandradeo Ojha. Both are residents of village – Chakia Ojha Tola, P.S. – Chakia, District – East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ======== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shantanu Kumar ======== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA) ***** 2 13-09-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Trial 4106/11 arising out of Complaint Case No. 2261/07, pending in the court of Sri Jitesh Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Motihari, East Champaran, are named accused in this case with allegation of grabbing Rs. 20,000/- from the complainant. Submission is that initially on the basis of complaint case no. 1338/2005 relating to execution of deed in the year Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27890 of 2011 (2) dt.13-09-2011 2 / 2 2 2002 for a piece of land one Chakia P.S. Case No. 173/2006 was instituted. Police after investigation submitted final form which was accepted, but case proceeded on protest complaint wherein recently after inquiry cognizance has been taken. Considering the facts and circumstances and nature of allegation, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Jitesh Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Trial 4106/11 arising out of Complaint Case No. 2261/07, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least one year or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J)