IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8683 of 2008 Anita Rani, wife of Sri Shambhu Kumar Yadav, village Sahtola, Amarpur, PS and district Saharsa – Petitioner. Vs. 1) The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna. 2) The Dist. Magistrate, Saharsa. 3) The S.D.O. Saharsa. 4) The Dist. Programme Officer, Saharsa. 5) The Chief Dev. Project Officer, Karha, Saharsa. 6) The B.D.O. Saharsa. 7) The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Amarpur, Dist. Saharsa – Respondents. 2 17.5.2011 The petitioner is aggrieved by order, dated 11.4.2008 by which the District Magistrate, Saharsa has terminated the engagement of Aanganbari Sevikas / Sahaikas of four Centers. It has been directed by the District Magistrate that fresh appointment should take place. The reasons for terminating the engagement of the petitioner and others is that the proceeding for appointment indicated that the Mukhiya and the Up-Mukhiya had not signed the proceeding. This created great confusion in the appointment process. It was found that the entire procedure was illegal and, therefore, the District Magistrate ordered a fresh selection. It is hoped that the selection must have been made by now and it is important to run the Centre in order to provide benefits to the womens and the children of the area by providing them ration and Khichri at the Centre. The petitioner has a right to appeal before the Commissioner of the Division. If the petitioner files an appeal along with a limitation petition, the limitation petition may be 2 considered sympathetically and the appeal disposed of expeditiously. This writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)