1 cp299.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 299 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6290 OF 2009 [ Waman Eknath Parekar vs. Nanded Waghala Mun.Corpon.] WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 130 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6287 OF 2009 [ Madhukar Tukaram Pandit vs. Nanded Waghala Mun.Corpon.& Ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. P.V. Mandlik, Sr. Counsel i/b Mr. Amol S. Gandhi, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. M.V. Deshpande, Advocate for respondents. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 26TH JULY, 2011 PER COURT : In pursuant to these contempt petitions, the respondents have filed affidavit in reply stating therein that they have complied the order of which disobedience has been alleged in these 2 cp299.10 contempt petitions. 2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners wish to withdraw both the contempt petitions. Both the Contempt Petitions are disposed of, as withdrawn. Notice stands discharged. 3. It is needless to mention that if the petitioners are aggrieved by the decision of the Authority on representation, the petitioners can avail appropriate remedy permissible in law. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/JUL11