:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5088 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.5088 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.5088 OF 2006 Shri.Maruti Bhagya Dhule .. Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. None for petitioner. Advocate for respondent No.4 is absent. Mr.A.H.Palekar, A.G.P. for respondent No.1 to 3. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATE : 11th June, 2007. DATE : 11th June, 2007. DATE : 11th June, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This petition impugns the Judgement and Order dated 10th July, 2006 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Konkan Division, Mumbai upholding the setting aside of petitioner’s election to the post of the Sarpanch. 2. An affidavit has now been filed by one Kiran Sudhakar Panbude, Tahsildar, Karjat. In the said affidavit, it has been stated that by an order dated 10/07/2006, the Additional Commissioner, Konkan Division dismissed the appeal of the petitioner. Pursuant to the said :2: setting aside, fresh election for the post of Sarpanch was held on 10/08/2006 and in the said election, the present respondent No.4 was declared elected. 3. In that view of the matter, no case for interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is made out. Petition is, therefore, dismissed summarily. (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (R.M.SAVANT, J.)