^^s t^i2i; BBKK^B^N 8.' fXsvSs9Sit:sWtS'~ 3:';'Si'': ••;'-?.?;"' KSB i^ffiG SBR3^WISWffi@g9gS@KB^AT:BH-ASP(IR Cr.M.B.KO. ^BE3-I€ANT VERSUS BilNON-API^IC^INT: ^&s'- ^a|il^^:Burmaii,^:|^^|jt^ a-'^-^l'i.^^-a.^ ft^e> f^^A-^a i-tAA-tu^ eturtrte' ^lttf-' .;;f3t §t|i|^||fjg|tlff|||isgarh.^,3k»flT^.('> .'V ^.s KeNv' A@»LIG^tl©NiU/S4.820ii>NUnB 18SffilBi^^S^fr&S&E;fe3_lfe'li CRilVBIi^I; S:^l»«<\ .l^iii^jl M Itil XI-HC-78 3^ •^ww^, aTfl+f'is, fc|diyti<, ^l*1^TTSb*l|tb , SlT11fl']6, ^^-..M/^^ ^R; 200 3ll^l 4s|t*i (llcl?^'!l^!£I') W^TWf^TRi OTT3n^Tsti>(ich Fi:jj ^<iTW;Hf5(T3n^r 17.1.2007 ShriV.C. Ottalwar, coun; Shn G.K. Beriwal, Deputy| Heard. This is an application for the order dated 28.1 l.2006 pas;| Shri Ottalwar subinits heard by 'him from. the applican( have been enlarged on bail, h( Court during the .course of as| recorded in the order aad this date, six ofher co-accused regular bail aild also aiiticipatoiy bail to fhe only 3 persons were graated T^ graated regular bail on 01.12) came to kaow about this fact, on 01.12.2006 itsetffor the pu^- also subinits that even fhe ord availed by the petitiouer becau^i for fhe petition.er has been reco^ Shri Ottahvai' submits inakiag such stateinent. Hi coiniiu.tted bv liim was boi inforaiation froin fhe side of thle fib.at pers|ous consideniig applica^its ^raW^ iffiraY fr'tec^t-^r.RTC ^srf^TtTSll^T ;1 for fhe appucaiit. Advocate Gcneral for fhe St&te. torrectiou of th.e stateinent inade in. ^edmM.Cr.G.(A). No.3209/2006. under a wrong uifonaation ip; fhat six ofher co-accused persons inade fhis stateiaent before this tguruents and the same has been ;ourt considering fhat by the said have ah-eacly been enlarged oa tlie other points, gra&ted He subiuits that bv that date sgular bail aiid ofher persons '.vere 12006. He subinits fhat when be Die filed fhis Miscellaneous Petitiou of rectayiiig the iQistake. He ;r dated 28.11.2005 has not been a wrong stateiaent of the counsel -ded m. the said order. Ifhat he is tend' also submits that fhe inistake [ide on accoiuit of hearing wroiig accused. He prays for correcttas -—-^____t^L_^-'I___._. pu^pose g apolog;/ for aaticl.e 1 XI-HC-78 tTW^I SdWb 3^ "41'illfi'tt, »Tf)+l'16, RlMKiy (L^ ^,^ 'z^^ W! 200 Sli^l i<aw ('i^tjq^ff) STI^T^irf^TR; craTan^Tstiiit) ^ ?TgTWHf?cT3D^r -^z his stateinent contaiaed in the oil' fhe couasel for fhe State. In the opiDion of this C( bonaade. His subinissions are ait The prayer for inakiag con|i It is directed that ia page fhe words written like "six ofherl as 3 other co-accused persons" to the extent nidicated above. A copy of this order shaU Vf 3209/2006 aad when the 28.11.2006 passed ia the order shail also accoiupaay the C| The petition stands fiaaUy Certified copy as per rules. oi^der. The prayer is not opposed by *itil<-i41'i tiiiciTfftet^t'<Ri'wi< ^Sll^TTSn^T [}urt, the mistake appears to be );cepted. ictions is also accepted. ^ios. 1 & 2 offue impligned order, [co-accused persoas shaU be read ^nd the order shatl staad inodtfied kept ia fhe records ofM.Cr.C.(A) ceftified copy of fhe order dated aforelsaid M.Cr.C. wili be issued, this . C. of the said order. (lisposed of. Sd/- SunUKumar Sinha Judge