-^ cG-1^7_ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON S. N0.«^S°2<^ /2010 PETrTrONER RESPONDENTS €^ A%;" ^..•'iQ^-'.\^ r^y -^ ^•'' N^ ^ ^•? / Ram Sai Paikra, aged about 46 years, S/o Late Madhow Ram, occupation - Sub Inspector, Police Station - Ramanujganj, Police District Balrampur (CG) VERSUS ^1- State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Dept of Home, DKS Bhawan, Mantrataya, Raipur (CG) /2. Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter - Raipur (CG) / 3. Superintendent of Police, Police Distt. Batrampur (CG) / 4. Superintendent of Police, Distt. Kanker(CG) ^5. Station House Officer Ramanujganj, Police Distt. Balrampur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS^ CERTIORARI ETC .„.&.—.-.-- <3?l^T^Tf^TW ^TT^TT^'^sN ^cf ^qpTi^r,. -^^ns, f^Tmy VJ.V^.^.2-^^^ Kfe"'-"-"^"-"--""-f"--""1 ^?F ^^F (^qi^^) ^IIW^^S^ SB - Hon'hto Shri Manindra Mohan SNrivaskwa- J forttieipetitfoner. 07-07-2010 ShriArun Shukte, counsel Shri V. V. S. Murthy, Deputy Afl Panel Lawyer for the StatB/respondente.1 Heard. By this petition, ttie petitioner validity of transfer order dated 04-06^ 12-06-2010. Main submission of learned cour of transfer is that the order of fransfeil whereas after almost one year, the ordei he has been relieved vide order dated petitioner further submits that though \| W.P.(S)No.3501 of 2009 (Annexure | conskleration of petittoner's representatid Atong with the return filed by th^ (Annexure R«1) has been placed on l^titioner has been considered and been reject9d. In this view of the matter, 1 am transfisr dated 04-06-2(X)9 only on imptemented for long time. It is a mattei who is to be posted at whteh place. with the same. Taking into consideratioh force and Ihe matter relates to deptoymet|i not find any ground to interfere with ttie tn the result. the petifon is dismis^ed afte|r Issufe ^mMN ^HH^ ^ fe^'^^ ^^t^a^i ^ocate General with Mrs. Smtta Ghai, |as called in quesfon the legatity and j>009 as ateo the relieving orcter dated )sel for the petitioner assaiting the order was issued way back on OA-Q6-2W9 1 offransfer has been given effect to and 12-06-2010. Learned counsel for the ide order dated 16-07-2009 pa^ed in P-2), this Court had directed for tn, the same has not yet been decided. respondents, order dated 24-06-2010 r^cord, by which. representation of the assigning the reasons, the same has ^rra^r ^^T ^TITT^, ^RT-^rr^ —FS/147—2/201 o —i,00,000. nbt inclined to interfere with the order of t|ie ground that the same was not Ifor the administratton to consicter as to relating to relieving is ateo connected that the petitioner betongs to police ^t of police forw in sensitive areas» 1 do 1-der of transfer of the pelitioner. "-""s""'"""