THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A.No.1730 of 1999 JUDGMENT: Respondents 1 to 3 filed O.A.A.No.1 of 1998 before the Secunderabad Bench of Railway Claims Tribunal, pleading that late Vishnu Markandeya Gupta, the husband of the 1st respondent and father of respondents 2 and 3, died in an untoward incident that occurred, on 20.08.1997. It was alleged that he was traveling in train No.8518 Visakhapatnam - Bilaspur Express, and while he was getting down at Bobbili Railway Station, he slipped and fell on the tracks. Thereafter, he is said to have been crushed under the wheels of the train. The appellant opposed the claim by disputing the occurrence of the accident. The respondents were put to strict proof of the claim made by them. Through its order, dated 13.07.1998, awarded a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-, as compensation, and apportioned the same among the respondents as well as Swarnalatha, married daughter of the deceased. The same is challenged in this C.M.A. Heard Sri Venkata Malla Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri N.Pardha Saradhy, Learned counsel for the respondents. On the basis of the pleadings before it, the Tribunal framed the following issues: 1) “Whether the applicants are dependants of the deceased? 2) Whether the deceased was a bona fide passenger? 3) Whether the accidental fall as alleged is not an untoward incident? 4) To what relief?” The documentary evidence before it comprised of Exs.A.1 to A.5, namely, FIR, inquest report, post-mortem report, death certificate and legal heir certificate. The appellant did not dispute the occurrence of the accident. The relationship of the respondents with the deceased was established through Ex.A.5. No factual, or legal error, is pointed out in the order passed by the Tribunal. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the same. The C.M.A. is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dated:19.08.2009. GJ