IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 207 OF 2011 SHRI ABDULAZIZ MULLA ... Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. D. J. Pangam, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. Bandodkar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Anthony D'Silva, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Coram:- S.A. BOBDE & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 8th August, 2011 P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The learned Counsel for respondent no.2 objected to the maintainability of this petition on the ground that alternate remedy is available to the petitioner under Section 22 of the Goa, Daman and Diu School Education Act, 1984 and Rules 1986. In the circumstances, the learned Counsel for the petitioner who is present in Court, upon instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a petition before the Tribunal. If the petitioner approaches the Tribunal within a period of 7 days from today, the Tribunal shall not dismiss the appeal on the ground of limitation. 3. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as above. The Tribunal shall decide the matter as expeditiously as possible. S.A. BOBDE, J. F. M. REIS, J. NH