Cri. Appln. No. 2640/11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2640 OF 2011 Raisuddin s/o. Mainuddin Kazi, R/o. Dhaknewadi, Tq. Kaij, Dist. Beed. ....Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent. Mr. G.N. Kulkarni, Advocate for applicant. Mr. B.J. Sonawane, APP for State/respondent. CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 19th July, 2011. PER COURT : 1. This application is filed for bail in Cr. No. 120/2010 registered with Peth Police Station, Beed for offences punishable under sections 302, 34 etc. of IPC. 2. The previous bail application bearing Criminal Application No. 448/2011 is rejected by this Court on merits. The advocate for the applicant submitted that the applicant wants to attend the marriage of his brother and for that purpose, he wants to be released on bail. For this purpose, bail cannot be granted. The advocate then requested for direction to Sessions Court to see that the case is expeditiously disposed of. He submitted that the applicant is behind bars since last more than Cri. Appln. No. 2640/11 2 eight months. In view of these circumstances, a direction can be given to the Sessions Court to take steps for expeditious disposal of the case. If the case is not expedited within four months, that will give ground for the applicant to approach this Court or Sessions Court for bail. 3. So the application stands disposed of as not pressed. Sessions Court is hereby directed to take steps to see that Sessions Case filed against the applicant is concluded, in any case within four months from the date of receipt of this order. If the case is not disposed of within four months, the applicant will be at liberty to move the application to Sessions Court and also to this Court for bail and that can be treated as change in circumstances. [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] ssc/criapln2640.11