1 s-2997-08 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi SUIT NO. 2997 OF 2008. Syntex Pharm AG. ..Plaintiff. vs. Cipla Limited & Anr. ..Defendants. .... Mr. Venkatesh Dhond, a/w. Mr. Rajiv Singh, i/b. Grawford Bayley & Co., for Plaintiff. Mr. Rahul Chitnis, a/w. Ms. Kadambari Surve, i/b. M & M Legal Ventures, for Defendant No.1. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 24TH JANUARY 2011. P.C. The following order is passed by consent of the parties : (i) The Suit is decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). (ii) As regards prayer clause (c), the learned Advocate appearing for the Defendant No.1 on instructions states that the Defendant No.1 is not in possession of any of the articles, dies, cartons, boxes, wrappers, labels, papers and things bearing the impugned trade mark. The statement is accepted as an undertaking of the Defendants. (iii) The Plaintiff is not pressing for prayer clause (d) of the Suit. (iv) The Suit is accordingly, disposed of. Refund of Court fees as per Rules. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]