IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11626 of 2010 Nandlal Prasad S/O Mathura Prasad R/O Vill Punaul, P.S.Narhat, Distt-Nawada ..Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Additional Director General of Police, B.M.P. Patna 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police , Personnel Bihar, Patna 4. The Deputy Inspector General f Police, B.M.P. (Central Division) Patna 5. The Deputy Inspector General Of Police Magadh Range, Gaya- Cum-Chairman Police Selection Committee, Central Board No.1, Hajipur, Distt-Vaishali 6. The Commandant, B.M.P.-3, Bodh Gaya, Distt-Gaya. ..Respondents ----------- 2 21.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was an applicant for the post of Constable under Advertisement 02 of 2004. Learned counsel submits that the impugned order dated 03.12.2009 states that he had secured 11 points and that the last candidate appointed had secured 12 points. He next submits that the Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 831 of 2009 has given directions for re-ascertainment of vacancies under Advertisement 01 and 02 of 2004. The petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ application but without prejudice to his rights and claims that may surface subsequent to re- ascertainment of vacancies when persons till 11 points may or may not also become eligible for appointment. The Court finds the prayer reasonable and fair. Without interfering with the order dated 03.12.2009 the application is permitted to be withdrawn with the observation 2 that any rights of the petitioner to be considered consequent to re-ascertainment of vacancies may not be prejudiced by the order dated 03.12.2009 as also the present order. The writ application stands disposed as withdrawn. Md. Ibrarul ( Navin Sinha, J.)