IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2268 of 2011 1. Rambha Rani Shukla. 2. Jay Shankar Shukla. 3. Vijay Krishna Shukla. 4. Raman Kumar Shukla. Daughter and Sons of Shri Ganesh Tiwari, Presently residing at “Pushpanjali”, East Boring Canal Road, Sur Sudha Apartment Lane, Patna-800 001. .......Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, through Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Patna. 2. Vice Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 3. Coordinator, College Development Project, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 4. Dr. Damodar Mahto, Head of the Department of Sanskrit, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. ...........Respondents ----------- 03 28.06.2011 Taking into consideration the fact that the regulation does not permit re-evaluation, no direction can be issued in favour of the petitioners merely because they have assessed themselves to be better students than what the examiner has assessed them to be. If re- totaling does not beget them the required marks to pass, re-evaluation cannot be ordered in absence of the regulation. Writ is dismissed. Safik (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)