IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 14672 of 2008 Between: TCS Kothakota Village and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District, Rep by its President, V. Murali Goud ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, at Hyderabad. 2 The Prohibition and Excise, Superintendent, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of prohibition or any other appropriate writ or writs, order or direction, interdicting the 2nd respondent from proceedings further pursuant to the Show Cause Notices dt. 17-5-2008 in RC No. B/849/07 on his file by holding that the 2nd respondent does not have jurisdiction to issue the said show cause notices and to declare the said show cause notices as on without any basis, award costs and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.SRIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 14672 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since the impugned orders have been withdrawn by the respondents and the respondents have issued a fresh notice, the petitioner does not wish to pursue the writ petition with liberty to pursue appropriate proceedings against the fresh notice now issued. Granting the liberty as sought, the writ petition is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 11-07-2008 Pvks/*