IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminial Misc. No.M-28482 of 2009 Date of decision : 12.10.2009 Pooja Pandey .....Petitioner Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh and another ...Respondents **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Vikram Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. S. D. ANAND, J. Learned counsel states that he would be content and interests of justice would be served if respondent no.2 is directed to dispose of the representation Annexure P-5 within reasonable period. The petition shall stand disposed of accordingly with a direction to respondent no.2 to to dispose of the representation Annexure P-5 made by the petitioners. The exercise shall be concluded within one month from today. The respondent No. 2 shall ensure that the petitioners shall have the similar constitutional protection which is available to all the citizens of the country under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The reiteration of that obvious constitutional guarantee would not be inferred to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the averments in the course of the petition qua the factum/validity of their matrimonial alliance. Disposed of accordingly. October 12, 2009 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE