IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS THURSDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2011 / 12TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(Crl.).No. 36 of 2011(S) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- K.K.SASIDHARAN, S/O.KUMARAN NAIR, KIZHAKECHALIL, IRAMALLOOR P.O., KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.ELIAS RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOTHAMANGALAM. PIN: 686 691. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTHAMANGALAM. PIN: 686 691. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTHAMANGALAM. PIN: 686 691. 4. MUHAMMED BILAL, S/O.LATHEEF, AYYARIL HOUSE, IRAMALLOOR P.O., KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. PIN: 686 691. R1 TO R3 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI P.K. BABU. SRI.K.P.WILSON (KOTHAMANGALAM) FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(CRL).NO.36 OF 2011 S PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE PETITIONER'S DAUGHTER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 20/11/2010. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE PETITIONER'S DAUGHTER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 18.01.2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// PS TO JUDGE K.M. JOSEPH & M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(CRL).NO. 36 OF 2011 S ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 3rd March, 2011 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. Petitioner is the father of the alleged detenu who is none- other-than his elder daughter. Illegal detention is alleged as against the fourth respondent. 2. We had already passed an interim order dated 31.1.2011 wherein we had noted that the notice for the proposed marriage under the Special Marriage Act has been given on 29.1.2011. We had directed the alleged detenu to reside in a hostel. She was produced today. We interacted with her. She would state that she is inclined to go with the fourth respondent. Her parents were present today. We allowed the parents to interact with the alleged detenu for some time. Again, when the matter was called, the alleged detenu would reiterate that she would like to go with the W.P.(CRL).NO. 36/2011 S 2 fourth respondent, and that she would like to marry the fourth respondent. 3. In the circumstances of the case, we close this Writ Petition and we permit the alleged detenu to go with the fourth respondent for solemnizing their marriage under the Special Marriage Act. Post the case on 10.3.2011 for production of the Marriage Certificate. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE kbk. //True Copy// W.P.(CRL).NO. 36/2011 S 3