1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.209 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.209 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.209 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.147 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.147 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.147 OF 2007 Johanna Luke Amanna .. Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.M.D.Naik, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 and 12 Mr.G.D.Utangale for respondent nos.2 to 6 Mr.S.D.Mishra for respondent nos.9 and 10 Ms.S.M.Mondle for respondent nos.13 to 15 CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE: 10TH FEBRUARY, 2009 DATE: 10TH FEBRUARY, 2009 DATE: 10TH FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C. 1. None for the petitioner. 2. The prayer of the petitioner is that the High Power Committee constituted by the respondent be directed to fix up the date for hearing of the application filed by the petitioner. 2 3. The learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for respondent nos.2 to 6 state that the High Power Committee has already taken a decision in the matter. In this view of the matter, notice of motion is dismissed as infructuous. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.) (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.) (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.)