06 $- .' ir '.8aa -t- IN THE HIGH COURT CRL.M.C .2363t20r0 RAJ KUMAR & ANR. Through: OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Petitioners Counsel for the petitioners (appearance not given). ..... Respondents Gupta, APP for the State Veer Singh, P.S. Preet VETSUS S'TAIE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: Mr. Arvind Kr. with ASI Satya Vihar. CORAM: * HON'I}LE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA ORDER ,/, 27.0g.2010 Petitioners and respondent No.2 are present in person. I have spoken to pctilioners and respondent No.2. Let staternent of respondent No.2 be recorded on oath. . I have heard thc statement made by respondent No.2. Learned counsel for a the petitioners has drawn rny attention to the MLC issued by the Life Line Hospital, { said MLC on his face. Respondent No.2 has also stated the said fact before rne. I have seen respondent No.2 who is present in person. IIIR in the present case was registered in the year 2004 and till toclay even charge has not bcen frarnecl. In view of the aforesaid settlement, I do not think any useful purpose will be scrved in continuing lvith the present crirninal proceedilg. The petitioners hercin are young boys. As per the status report, they are not involved in any other oase. I'he pctitioners will however, deposit Rs.5,000/- each with Delhi Fligh Court Legal .t Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified , ^ Scrviccs Cornrnittee within three days. In vierv of the settlement and the facts stated above and subject to the petitioners depositing Rs.5,000/- each with the Delhi High Court Legal Servrces Cornrnittee, the present petition is allor.ved and FIR No.195/2004 Police Station Preet Vihar, which was registered under Section 325134IPC and the charge sheet which was filed under Section 326134IPC are hereby quashed and set aside. Dasti. il(- SANJIV KHANNA. J. : AUGUST 27,2010 ir :_ Ir '-.v <J .1 {