In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CWP No.10150 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.06.2010 Darshan Kaur and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondent. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. ... Alok Singh, J. (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioners states that respondent No.6 is withdrawing old-age pension while he is not entitled for. He further states that a representation Annexure P-3 was moved and thereafter, representations Annexures P-5 to P-7 were moved, but no action has been taken on the representations. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, petition is disposed of with the direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to take decision on the representations of the petitioners Annexures P-3 and P-5 to P-7 within a month from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 29.06.2010 sk.