IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2011 / 12TH PHALGUNA 1932 LA.App..No. 955 of 2010(C) -------------------------- LAR.489/1997 of ADDL.SUB COURT,KOLLAM .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT IN LAR ------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER LATHA T.T.HANKAPPAN RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT ----------------------- JANAKI AMMA SAROJINI AMMA, PRAKKILAZHIKAM, POZHIKKARA. ADV. SRI.AJAYA KUMAR. G FOR R1 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------ L.A.A.No. 955 OF 2010 ------------------------ Dated this the 3rd day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Even though the learned Government Pleader Smt.Latha T.Thankappan addressed strenuous arguments mentioning that Ext.A1 document relied on by the claimant is a post notification document, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment. On going through the impugned judgment, we find that the learned Subordinate Judge did not rely on Ext.A1. On the contrary, enhancement is given taking into account the importance of the locality where the property is situated at and its nearness to the various institutions and establishments in the area. Having carefully gone through the impugned judgment, we feel that it is more or less the correct market value of the property at the relevant time which has been arrived at by the learned Subordinate Judge. The appeal will stand dismissed in limine. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE dpk