IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 09.09.2010 C.R.No.4316 of 2010 (O&M) Kulwant Singh ...Petitioner Versus Smt. Satwinder Kaur etc. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. R.K.Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present revision petition is to an order passed by the learned trial Court on 08.06.2006 and the order in appeal dated 01.05.2010, whereby an application for grant of ad interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2, was dismissed. The petitioner seeks restraint order against the respondents from using the matrimonial home. It has been found by both the Courts below that the plot on which the house has been constructed is in the name of the wife of the petitioner i.e. respondent No.1. Therefore, the petitioner has no right to use such house. Both the Courts have given detailed and cogent reasons while declining the application for ad interim injunction. In view of the above, I do not find that the reasons given by both the Courts below suffer from any patent illegality or irregularity, which may warrant any interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Dismissed. 09.09.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE