Page no. 1 M.Cr.C. no. 7652/2011 04/11/2011 Shri Ritesh Inani, Advocate for the applicant. Shri R. S. Parmar, P.L. for the respondent – State. Arguments on the first anticipatory bail application filed under section 438 of Cr.P.C by the applicant Sanjay heard. The applicant is involved in Crime no. 139/2011 of Police Station- Udaynagar, District- Dewas registered under sections 498-A, 306 of the IPC According to the prosecution story, on 27/02/2011, Sarita was admitted in hospital as a brunt case. She expired on 28/02/2011, hence merg no. 17/2011 was registered. During investigation, it was found that she was being harassed by the applicant for demand of dowry. Hence the applicant is apprehending his arrest. It has been argued by the applicants' counsel that co-accused Dhapubai, Kumari Rita, Kumari Antim and Smt Sarika have been granted anticipatory bail. The applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. The deceased died after eight and half years of her marriage. She had two children. Her dying declaration was recorded, in which she deposed that she poured kerosene in the stove, at that time by inflation her sarri caught fire and she was burnt. She has not alleged any person responsible for this incident. In the history given to the doctor, she narrated the same fact. Due to 91% burn, she died. The FIR was lodged by the father of the deceased on 23/03/2011 near about after 24 days after the incident. Hence the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail. Page no. 2 The respondent has opposed the bail application. Considering the circumstances and after perusal of the case diary, this bail application is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest, the applicant be released on bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the following conditions : 1. that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by police officer as and when required. 2. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him / her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police officer: 3. that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. C c as per rules. ( I. S. Shrivastava, J. ) amol