@ ‘\§ EEFGRE m liON’BLE HGE CCMRT OF CEiiATTISGARH, A?mUR WE}. NO. WPI‘EQQ 1‘ B5}. BKAggAwYA $I‘O‘Late R Saiymaarayan, .?6\ %® ‘ my Ageii (3mg; amt :3é 1x3. years, LOQ Sweat Na32, 36cm: 5, ‘Bhiiai, Eist Dm'g‘ 10‘ Rajashm 35's K, C. Smmxa,‘ §1gtvg§ abw: 4i} y§m§ Egg 2§&*’Amez»;e~3, Seamr-a} £§h§m M. $3. Naaéa, Sm Late 3.3. Manda, E‘xga'i $2 Years, Biwk §$Eiat4 2 'Ham NW East, 3h§ai i” EL $§ni¥astavg 35ft} Ski BR Wmtava, Agaé ahcmt 45 Yam, 1m 5M} $5, Bhiiai Ehmnaih Shim Sm Law Shh? Ckaz‘an $hévas,‘ Agaai %$3 years Rik: Kassikaf E3ar3? Emma {S‘anéhi‘ Waré, Wam 'E'Eoj 4 Rgi‘gw 492W} ’ f2} 1 . Eggisirar Tradg Hnien, M?“ Mati Bmxgalew, kém‘e {MEJ {JV Reg'strar Trade Un§m~ Raigaur£hmrtism ‘ 3. Stw§ Warkm Uxiim, Sihmm 3ha$rfi Sadan, Swim 6, Bhiiai. 4. 3mm (2m; Sm Nat hmwn REG BangaEaw Nuii}, 32, Bwgamw wmpiex, Bh§lai 5. ’3. S, Eaku, Ska Eat imtmm 33‘A‘ Avaime Aw Sam: 2 BELAE 5‘ é. :{fmgmzm $mg§z§ Sm Lam Shiimvas Singh Q£NQ.3A,S&¢8£ Na} 3 Swmmi BIPEELE ’13hri Rmi AWQ Ska N¢t kmwri Ric BK3W'4, Nehm Nagar, Bhiiai, V 7‘ {3} bi s szmN? W ‘ 3’0 La&ShnTP Sham Rm 133B Sweet No 13 beetcwi Bhiiai 9. mt. Lam Camis§oneg Burg,WW RESFGNDMS yETmeN mg gTlgiE 2 CGNSWON OF EBIA FOR IESUE (E W GR . ‘ it 0 {)RA {)R i7 germwaF Lma; Na'img mg? RIT 3a mmrm, mime; fmg? wéw KW w.P. No. 39/2090 WW < ”Ml 200 , finding tovall the issues A£ter hearing counSel rep1 length, onevthing seems‘tc was held by the Genetal Cc Mr. Vyas. learnedvcgunsel done by following'proéédux Be‘that as it may, validity of the said eleot gating before the’Industfi instance'of respondents no x, Mr. H.N¢_Vyas,{1earned Sr, counsel with Mr; N.K. Vyas for the petitioner. . Dr. N.K. Shukla, nos. 1,2 & 9. . ‘ Mr. Rajeev‘Shrivastsva, learned counsel for respon7e§% dents nos. 4 to 6. \ Mr. $.12. obesh, 1A nos. 3(7 & 8. Heards I have made‘an ati can be finally heard and dispbsed of on merits by giving raised in the present petition. ‘esenting the parties.at some [be Cléar to he that election hncil though as contended by for the petitioner, it was not e prescribed in this regardJ the matter as regar s the V ,. V‘ r ‘ theetefmt— W /» s. 7 & 8. It hes been contended aa:ned counsel for respondents p u ;empt to see whether the matter on‘is’noW’penaingk al Court‘at Raipur, at the [new .02 learned Dy.A.G. for respondents \ {Wa.“: Wams$w V i” m aaw HFa'a Ammw #mm ?mW W@& %QW7¥ gigWm $mzw$m W 2 0/ 3/2 001 ‘on behalf of the respc-ndegts that this writ petition is not maintainable inasm?ch as an alternative rgmedy is available as the petitioners would also have approag‘hed the Industrial Court whic is competent to decide the grieVances of the writ pe itioners. Mr. Vyas submitted that since the petitioner nos. .1 & 2 were not elected according to the procedur laid down in this regard, they could not have appro ched the Industrial Court. ‘ In ’ this regard, certaing c7 ere sought to be placed before this Court. I am. however, the view that. it will be m a difficult for this Court to enter into all these issues of facts as regards the actual holding of the election and participatio of the petitioners nos.\1 & 2. It would be mest conveni nt for the Industrial Courtm determine every aspect o the grievance of all the; parti‘) concerned. In this view of the matter, the petitioners nos. 1 5c 2 should not ha e any difficulty in placing their own griefances before the Incite trial Court. Therefore, any opinion about the decisions y 3’&ovw& WWA"%~£ M53 V I % rendered by the M P Hi h Court in the matter of inter— pretation of Sect on 28- of Indian Trade Unions (M P e Amendmenk Act 1960 as o do s #u w 7} I m . Hence, without igiving any finding to the issues k raised before me and the Isubmissions made at the Bar v today, I am of the View hat it would be fair and reasonable i,“ L.” (.‘xRPIU~~-FS/'.)A i~~v1/2UOI‘50,{)OO a “3 h o a‘mm fm~31rw mm(ma{a) Wwwht‘l%r€rnm EFw%w5Wm ,.2 XvHC/ZII gammaa, 3mg, férawg W‘T § y gvi 200 War.. a m$§mNE%W a§m%n i%w$a%m %m%a%a emhwwwmdiHeat%§r évmhna&$ rsnr q :3 .C if I disp03e of this writ 1 1) the petitioners >etition as follQws: os.1 & 2 shall be at liberty to approach the ndustrial Court to redress their grievances the peti- tioners nos. 1 & 2 shall be at liberty to participate at e proceedings pending before the Industrial C urt at Raipur; the petitioners file pleadings: After hearing ali the parties the learned shall decide the matter I the pettioners shall appear before the Industrial Court 2) 3) IndLs tri e1 Court on merits: and at Raipur on 30/3/2001 with a copy of this order. Certified copy to In other words, hall;alsc be permitted to. all the parties . ()4 av \Né [w%%%& A// Chief Justice .