IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40309 of 2008 1) Shah Alam, 2) Iliyas, 3) Islam, 4) Muslim, 5) Mateful, all sons of Qumrul Huda, 6) Danish 7) Azdani, both sons of Shah Alam, 8) Noorul Uda, son of Tafezul, 9) Shahnawaj, son of Noorul Huda, 10) Sahnaj, wife of Noor Huda, 11) Mumtaz, son of Rahmatrullah, 12) Hakim, 13) Mateen both sons of Chamarul, 14) Shamshad, son of Noorul Huda, 15) Noorjahan, wife of Shah Alam, 16) Saora, wife of Iliyas, 17) Ansari, wife of Islam, 18) Rahmati, wife of Muslim, 19) Sanjeed, wife of Hasseeb, 20) Chamania, wife of Qumrul, all of village Ghat Bhabhantoli, PS and District Kishanganj – Petitioners. Vs. 1) The State of Bihar, 2) Kamrul Hoda, son of Jamaluddin, Ghat Bhabhantoli, PS and district Kishanganj – Opp. Parties. 3 5.8.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed for quashing the order, dated 13.5.2008 passed in Complaint Case No. C1131/2007 by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Kishanganj by which cognizance for the offences under sections 323, 147, 380, 504, 427 and 452 of the Penal Code has been taken against the petitioners. It appears that the parties have filed several cases against each other over a dispute of irrigation of a piece of land. Counsel for the petitioners submits that earlier the 2 petitioners had filed a case on 3.8.2007. In order to make a defence in that case, the present case has been filed. These aspects of the matter should be considered by the court below at appropriate stage of the case. This court also finds that the allegations are petty in nature and as such the case should be heard expeditiously. For the present this court finds no illegality in the impugned order. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)