vwvvw . . ’ r « w J—V , n. n r “ g Wmh $ x § PETITION UNDER SECTION 48gcoDE OF CRIMINAL E t PROCEDURE, 1973. APPLICANT ;- . Rohlt Kumar Sao S/osao, NONE—APPLICANT V " §§fiv THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR, ((2%5‘g y Cr. M. P. No. bl b5 0f 2007 Aged about 77 years, Occupation— No. 1 ‘ E _ Retired Government Servant and 1 V Secretary Praghya Shikshan Sarniti, ‘Gayatri Dham, Raigarh, R/o- - Boirdadar, Raigarh, Tahsil & Distri'et Raigarhrce.) i VERSUS 1 a I /V No E—APEPLICANTS" :— / Ramkrishna Son S/o Munuram 7 i “Song Aged about 7O years? OCcupation— Retired Government Ii § I I I ‘ d Servant, R/o Bo'rrdadar, Raigarh3 Tahsil 86 District Raigarh (C.G‘; APPLICANT E—A‘ .' —" l/Q ‘Gau/tam Prasad Patel S/o Sunder V Patel, IDeputy President ,Praghya * 9 Shikshan Samiti,’ Raigarh, R/o Malipara, Raigarh, Tahsili & District v Raigarh (C;G.). NON—APPLICANT No. 2 j /. Ravindra Kumar Chaube S/o Kalidin Chaube, Treasurar Praghya ~Shikshan Samiti, Raigarh, R/o Malipara, Rqaigvarh,‘ i _ \Tahsil 8r District Raigarh (CL.G_.). NoN-AI>PLICANTNo. 3 ‘ 4. State of Chhattisgarh, Through— District Magistrate, ;Raigarh’(c.o.) ‘ i J 3 i .__A _i ded r at 31/01/2007 passed by learned 4th Additional Session Judge (Fast Track Court) (Shri G. R. Sandey)’ Raigarh (C.G.), in Criminal Revision No. ‘g 157/2006 “Rohit Kumar Sao and others Vs, Ramkrishna Son” arising out of order dated 22/04/2006 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate (Shn B P Pandey) Raigarh 1n Crlminal Case No 1 675/2006 “Ramknshna Son Vs Rohlt Kumar Sao and others” and for quashing of the proceedings i of Criminal Case No 675/2006 “Ramknshna Son ‘ Vs Roh1t Kumar Sao and others pendlng before Chief Judic1al Magistrate (Shri A. Toppo), Raigarh the applicant named above most respectfully begs to prefer this petition on f0110win'g facts arid ggrieved b mpugned ord a y i er i ground amongst others: — FACTS OF THE CASE B‘aWWW mmQwM?N4G5/%i 200 amm (Wm WWW mmm mmm' WM‘§%€1W amifaqm .8: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. TiNKER DIWAKER 8 P i max M ...V23:§1?a20»1,9; I M? §‘ai%éh Kumar Tlwan counse! forhe apphcant MF‘KN §hakta counself rtherespondentNo 1 N 'None‘ for‘the respondents o 2 & 3 though served *‘* “WP‘avA Goverdhan PL forthe State/respondent No 4 Counsel for the applicant bmits that he may be permitted to Withdraw the present petition He however submtts that petitioner rs now aged about 8Q years and do s not keep good health. he submits that petitioner is facing unnece sary litigation since last about 10 years and, therefore, direction ay be issued to the trial Court to decide the trial as expeditiously a possibie Prayer made by counsel for the applicant appears to be .. - reasonable at“: ’ t, 3 r‘ ”i Accordingly, the present etition is dismissed as withdraWn w» mgThe trial Mrs directed to co ciude the trial as expeditiously as Vpossmle preferably Within one yea from the next date of hearing. ‘ Counsel for the petitioner u dertakes that the petitioner will co- operate in the triai and will not se k any adjournment. It wouid be the duty of the applicant and the non—appiicants to apprise the court below about pa sing of this order. Registry is also directed to send the copy of this o der to the concerned court./-