IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Revision No.1413 of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : JULY 7, 2011 SUBA SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Malkeet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the revision on merits. Arguments have been addressed only regarding quantum of sentence. 2 It has been argued that the petitioner is an ex- employee from the Border Security Force; is more than 65 years of age; is first offender and the cheese sold by the petitioner was not found injurious for human consumption, and was only found deficient in regard to fat contents. 3 Learned counsel for the petitioner further contends that the petitioner has faced trial since 2004 and, therefore, a lenient view be taken. 4 Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered opinion that substantial justice would be Criminal Revision No.1413 of 2011 (O&M) 2 done, considering the age and other factors mentioned above, if the order of sentence is modified. 5 Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed. Order of sentence, however, is modified. The petitioner is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 8 months. The sentence regarding fine is maintained. July 7, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?