:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2713 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 692 OF 2004 Shri Sunil Madhav Kalal ..Applicant Vs. 1. State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents Mr. P.J. Pawar for applicant. Mrs.M.P. Thakur, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 4. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & J. H. BHATIA,JJ. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & J. H. BHATIA,JJ. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & J. H. BHATIA,JJ. Date : November 09, 2006. Date : November 09, 2006. Date : November 09, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Writ Petition No. 692 of 2004 was disposed as infructuous by our order dated 25/9/2006 on the basis of the statement made by the learned AGP. However, now it is stated by the learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner that consequent to the order passed by the Hon’ble Minister on 6/8/2003 and which was impugned in Writ Petition No.692 of 2004, no steps have been taken by the concerned authorities to invite fresh applications and complete the process for allotment of rations shops. :2: 2. We have noted that in any case it was the petitioner’s revision application which was partly allowed by the impugned order and he was directed to be continued to run the subject shop until the fresh allotment process was completed. No prejudice has been caused to the petitioner who claims that he still runs the said shop. Undoubtedly, in the fresh round all the applications will have to be considered as per the law or the policy guide-lines laid down by the State Government. 3. With these clarifications, the review petition is disposed off. (J.H. Bhatia, J.) (J.H. Bhatia, J.) (J.H. Bhatia, J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)