HI6H COXJRT OF CHHATHSGARH. BILASPXJR WritPetltioa(S) Np,4731/2007 Petitioners B^ RESPONDENT8 1. >- 2. 3. 1. Seva Ram Verma, s/o Jhadu Ram Verma, aged about 42 years, r/o Indiia Colony, Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur (C.G) 2. Deveudra Kum.ar Venna, s/o Rishikesh Venna, aged about 43 years, r/o Kauial Colony, Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur(C.G) 3. Manharaa Lal sahu, s/o Aju Rani Sahu, aged about 38 years, r/o Indira Colony, Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur (C.G) 4. Awadh Rata Dewaugau, s/o Heinsai Dewangan, aged about 39 years, r/o Indira Oolony, Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur (C.G)_ Versas State of Chhattisgarh, tfarough the Secretaiy, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Shastri Chowk, Raipur, District, Raipur (C.G) District Education ofBcer, Raipur, Distt; Raipur (C.G) Block Education officer, Block Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur (C.G) Writ petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitutlon oflndia Appearauce: Shri Shiv Kuiaar Guha, couasel for fhe Petitioners. Ku. Deepali Pandey, Gtovt. Advocate, for the State/ icspondents on advan.ee copy ORAL ORDBR (14.8.200'^ SunU Kumar Sinha, J. Leacned counsel appearing for the petitioneis as also for the State/respondents joiafly submit that fhe facts aad question of law iavolved ia the present writ petition are squarely » -•2-- covered by the decision of fhis Court ia case of Teishwcint Kunuiir Bhwrcwbttaj -vs- SSunicipal Corporatton, Durg <uid emother reported in S006 (iy 3SPJR CG 96. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ petition (S) No.5862 of 2006 (Heniaat Kuinar Vishwakanna Vs. State of Chliatdsgarh aad ofhers) and ofher coniiected matter, decided by thia Court on 12.12.2006, pursuant to fhc laemo dated 28.1.1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and fhe prospectus of Diploma ia Education Exammation, it was clarified that fhe nomenclature of the Basic Tramiag Institute i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renanied as Diploma m Education i.e., D.Ed. Accordiagly, the D.Ed., certificate holders are also covered by the decision in W.P.(S) No.5862/2006 (Hemant Kumar Wshwakarma-vs- State ofC.GSs others (supra). For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petition is disposed of in tenns of the decision of this Court ia fhe inatter of Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj (suprd), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired D.Ed., Certificate at fheir own expenses as per the circular dated 24.12.1998 & 01.3.1999 and further whether they have been paid advance iacrements or not. No order as to costs. Sdf- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Rao