IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3903 of 2011() ------------------------------------- (CRIME NO.389/2011 OF PULIKEEZHU POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT) ......... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED NO.1 TO 4: --------------------------------------------------------- 1. ARAVIND R KUMAR @ UNNIKRISHNAN NAMBOOTHIRI, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.REJI KUMAR, SANTHI NIKETHAN, NIRANAM.P.O., KADAPRA VILLAGE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2. ASHA R KUMAR, W/O.REJI KUMAR, AGED 50 YEARS, SANTHI NIKETHAN, NIRANAM.P.O., KADAPRA VILLAGE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 3. ANJU R, D/O.REJI KUMAR, AGED 21 YEARS, SANTHI NIKETHAN, NIRANAM.P.O., KADAPRA VILLAGE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 4. PRASANNAKUMARAN PILLAI, AGED 59 YEARS, MANAPURATH HOUSE, NIRANAM.P.O., KADAPRA VILLAGE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.JESWIN P.VARGHESE, SRI.BIJO THOMAS GEORGE. RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT AND STATE: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SANDHYA, AGED 21, D/O.VASUDEVA PANICKER, MUNDUKUZHI PUTHENPURACKAL HOUSE, MADAPPALLY MURI, MADAPPALLY VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE S.I.OF POLICE, PULIKEEZH POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADV. SMT. G.VIDYA R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. RAJESH VIJAYAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss CRMC.NO.3903/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A- CERTIFIED COPY OF F.I.R. IN CRIME NO.389/11 OF PULIKEEZH POLICE STATION. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.3903 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of November 2011 O R D E R Petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 4 in Crime No.389/2011 of Pulikeezhu Police Station, Pathanamthitta District. The offences alleged against them are under Secs.326 and 498A r/w 34 IPC. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that subsequently Sec.326 IPC was altered to Sec.325 since, according to the prosecution, no weapon was used for causing the injury. The first respondent is the de facto complainant therein. She is represented in this Court by her counsel. It is submitted by both sides that first accused and the first respondent are now living together happily and that the entire matter has been settled. Hence, this Crl.M.C. is allowed. Further proceeding in Crime No.389/2011 of Pulikeezhu Police Station, Pathanamthitta District is quashed. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt