IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 6145 of 2009 Between: Tanneru Venkata Raju, S/o. Venkateswarlu, R/o. MIG-23, APIIC Colony, Autonagar, VIJAYAWADA. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, KANDUKURU TOWN PS Kandukuru, Prakasam District. 2 Smt. Tanneru Aparna, W/o. Venkata Raja R/o. C/o. Chambeti Hari Babu, Palukuru POst and Village, Kandukuru Mandal, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in calling the Petitioner to Police Station at the behest of the 2nd respondent without there is case either registered or pending against the Petitioner herein as arbitrary, illegal, capracious and violative of personal life and liberty of the Petitioner as guaranteed under Art 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.6145 of 2009 Order: This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the first respondent in summoning the petitioner to the police station, at the instance of the second respondent, without there being any justifiable reason. The first respondent filed a counter affidavit denying all the allegations made by the petitioner. At para-4 of the counter affidavit, it is categorically stated that so far no complaint is registered against the petitioner, much less at the instance of the second respondent and as such, the question of summoning the petitioner to the police station does not arise. In view of the specific stand taken by the first respondent in his counter affidavit, no further adjudication is necessary in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 31.03.2009 VGB