:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.265 OF 2005 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2242 OF 2004 Jyotindra Shah ..Plaintiff. Vs. Jayesh B. Nagda ..Defendant. ALONGWITH SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.266 OF 2005 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2243 OF 2004 Nina J. Shah ..Plaintiff. Vs. Jayesh B. Nagda ..Defendant. ALONGWITH SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.267 OF 2005 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2241 OF 2004 Jyotindra Shah ..Plaintiff. Vs. Jayesh B. Nagda ..Defendant. ALONGWITH SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.284 OF 2005 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2126 OF 2004 Manan Shah ..Plaintiff. Vs. Jayesh B. Nagda ..Defendant. ALONGWITH SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.285 OF 2005 :2: IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2124 OF 2004 Jyotindra Shah ..Plaintiff. Vs. Bhawanji P. Nagda ..Defendant. ALONGWITH SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.293 OF 2005 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2485 OF 2004 Rachit Shah, a minor through his father and natural guardian Jyotindra V. Shah ..Plaintiff. Vs. Jayesh B. Nagda ..Defendant. ALONGWITH SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.294 OF 2005 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2125 OF 2004 Jyotindra Shah ..Plaintiff. Vs. Jayesh B. Nagda ..Defendant. ALONGWITH SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.295 OF 2005 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2185 OF 2004 Rajbai Bhimshi Shah ..Plaintiff. Vs. M/s.Rose Impex & Anr. ..Defendants. Ms.Rekha Shinde, Advocate for the Plaintiffs in all the matters. Mr.Kadam i/b. M/s.Kadam & Co. for the Defendants :3: in all the matters. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 1ST DECEMBER, 2005 DATED : 1ST DECEMBER, 2005 DATED : 1ST DECEMBER, 2005 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : By consent, Suit No.2493 of 2004 and Suit No.2244 of 2004 are taken on board and called out for hearing. 2. The learned counsel for all the parties state on instructions from their respective clients, that their clients have agreed to refer all the disputes and differences in the above suits as well as set-of or counter-claim, if any, therein, to the sole arbitration of Ms.Rajani Iyer, an Advocate of this Court. It is further agreed that the arbitrator shall have summary powers. It is further agreed that the arbitrator shall be entitled to make a common award or separate award as the arbitrator may deem fit. 3. It is agreed that the statement made on behalf of the Defendants as recorded in the order dated 24.3.2005 shall continue pending the arbitration proceedings. 4. It is agreed that the Defendants shall in the :4: first instance, pay the entire fees of the arbitrator. The same shall however be subject to the final award. 5. The disputes and differences are accordingly referred to the sole arbitration of Ms.Rajani Iyer. The suits are accordingly disposed of. Refund as per rules. For the purpose of refund, all parties including Prothonotary and Senior Master to act on an authenticated copy of this order.