^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH^AT BILASPUR W.P. N0. "^04 (, / 2003 (?\^ ^' SMT. DAYAMATI VERMA A<)'^ai3T)L(s^ x^ WIFE OF SHRI RAMESH PRASAD VERMA, AGANWADI WbRKER, R.ESIDENT OF VILLAGE PETITIONER TOKAPAL, DISTT. BASTAR [C.G.] VERSUS l.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY FOR WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE , DKS BHAVAN, RAIPUR [C.G.] 2. THE COLLECTOR, , BASTAR DISTT. BASTAR. .^ >^5?1"" .••••''.^o^ ^^^- -• ^w ..•'' '^y RESPONDENTS ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 22(S AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION QT^JNDIA FOR^THE ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURF—OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI AND/OR ORDER[S^ AND/OR DIRECTIONrS) IN THE NATURE OF WRITS AR. f3.S XI-HC—78 w^T^rl^Nr ?f^n'sn^r ^RfNr ^w^nr^Hi^ ~s^ ~^ww^, ^tiiy4t<o, fsi<<it^y,< ..i-..:y.;..T?o..:...1.0.^.. ^200'z> ^n^T'q^RF ('^rf^'^T) '^roT^rf^^iT^r 2Q.OZ.2004 Shri B.P. Sharma, cou q)|<sf<vi^^ T^FI^f ^' 'fe^t <P»1-^1< '^'stRRSH^T ^isel for the petitioner. Shri Raabir Stngh, Go|vt.Advocate for the respondents. Heard finaUy. The petitioner has filejd the present petition chaUenging )3 (Anncxiirc P-1) passcd by thc ordcr datcd 28.6.2( respondent no.2 so far as it relates to change of headquarter duriiig suspension. Shri B.P. Sharma su^inits that ttie allegations against the petitioner ai'e in resrlect of Bastanar where she was working and charge sheet t) suspension, her headquart] ^as been filed and pursucint to her ^r has been changed to Keshkal which is 122 Kins. away frc^ni Bajstanar. He subinits that the act of respondente shiftirig tjhe headquarters from Bastanar to Keshkal is harsh. He furth^r submits that there is nothtng on record to show the reason f<|>r shtfting of the petitioner to such a long distance. It is alsojsubmitted that the petitioner is a lady and is to raaintmn fainijly and her three children and ifthe hcadquartcrs is changcd to be provided accommodation| $uch long distance thcn shc has to where she can shift the family and her children may geteduc4tion etc. It is stated that Keshkal area of Bastar region is a I^axalite affected area and it wiU be difficult for her to live therel XI-HC—7S 3??^T^i'f^rw 'cT^T 3rH^1?^RN? ^L 4- ^,' •H'myji ^qi^. '3'^ ^fFn^?, ^tH'y<i<o, I^TTRy ,.^.;.\?:......'to..^..io. •^2003 ^?T 'q^RT (^f^^r) F'CTW^t^ 3:n^rr <=M^I<n<^1 'HR^ff ^ f^St iPt^li ^ 3TRW 3T?^?T Tf~i^ contendcd that th^ rc^pondcnte inay recon»iderthc same and tf at all she is reqlulred to be shifted, then she may be posted to a nearer pla< Bastanar, from where she c^n do journey up and down. Leamed counsel for supportcd thc iinpugncd ord Having considered thc case and material on record ;e of 20-30 Kms. distance from the State on the other hand sr. facts and circumstances of the in the opiiiion of this Court, the iinpugned order posting tltie petitioner to Kesl'ilial during suspension is not sustainab^ The collector may pas^ headquater to any place ijiearer to Bastanar and tiU the ^ aiid is set aside. a fresh order regarding change of reconsideration of the inattj^r she is aUowed to contuiue at Bastanar. It is however niad|e clear that in case any coinplaint regarding tampering or ottierwise is received against the appUcant, it is open to thje authorities concerned to pass appropriate ordersjoss^B^^ssiQs^.^^^nP^W^W^Q&^>^ • With the aforesaid oi disposcd of at this stagc, C.C. as perrules. bservation, this petition stands Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^