IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27889 of 2010 BALI RAM RAJAK Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 25.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Earlier this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 5563 of 2010 noticed the defence of a twenty years old marriage and disposed the application with directions to the trial court to ascertain if the deceased was young married woman or an elderly woman. Learned counsel submits that the informant, father of the deceased states in the F.I.R. that he came after the occurrence and was informed that his daughter was killed by throttling and the body was cremated. Her in-laws informed that she had consumed poison and that they had performed the last rites of the deceased. He then came back home without lodging the case and after consultation with his family members decided to lodge the case. The fresh impugned order of rejection notices that from the Post-mortem report of the Doctor the deceased was about 30 years of age. It is submitted that, if the dead body had been disposed off and the last rites performed, the question of post-mortem does not arise. 2 Learned counsel for the State from the case diary is unable to point out, who identified the dead body to be that of the deceased. It is next submitted from Annexure-3, Life Insurance Corporation of India, money receipt that the petitioner had taken L.I.C. policy cover in the name of his wife as far back as 31.12.1993, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 252 of 2008 P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)