ssp 1 WP 2440 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2440 OF 2011 Ramesh Mahadev Surve and Ors. .....Petitioners versus Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.N.R.Bubna, for the petitioners. Mr.V.M.Parshurami, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.G.W.Mattos, AGP, for respondent No.3 Mr.Bipin Joshi, for respondent No.4. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE: 17 th DECEMBER, 2011 P.C. 1. Counsel for respondent No.4 states that alternate premises are already offered to the petitioners, wherein a lift facility is also available. He submits that the permanent claim of the petitioners regarding permanent accommodation shall also be considered duly. He further submits that the agreements are already furnished to the petitioners, but the same is not signed by the petitioners. A copy of the agreement is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above, nothing further is required to be done in the matter, except directing the petitioners to vacate the premises, as the petitioners have not vacated the premises. We therefore, direct the petitioners to vacate the ssp 2 WP 2440 of 2011 premises in question and may occupy the alternate premises offered to them by the respondent No.4. Counsel for respondent No.4 submits that the keys of the respective alternative premises will also be handed over to the petitioners. 2. In view of what is stated above, the writ petition is rejected. 3. It is clarified that if the petitioners still takes high handed action by not vacating the premises in question, it will be open to the respondent No.4 to get vacated the premises in question through the police help. ( MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)