IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 4352 of 2011 Date of Decision: 4.11.2011 M/s ATC India Tower Corporation Pvt. Ltd. ....Petitioner. Versus Shakuntla Devi and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate for respondent No1. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this revision petition filed by defendant No.3-petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge is to the order dated 27.5.2011 passed by the trial court whereby the evidence of the petitioner was closed. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner could not produce the evidence earlier due to certain unavoidable circumstances and in the interest of justice, one opportunity may be granted to the defendant-petitioner to lead its entire evidence. It was urged that the petitioner will conclude the entire evidence at its own risk and responsibility on a date to be fixed by the trial court. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent No.1 supported the order passed by the trial court. C.R. No. 4352 of 2011 -2- After hearing learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the present case, this Court is satisfied that in the interest of justice the petitioner deserves to be granted one opportunity to conclude its entire evidence. Accordingly, the revision petition is disposed of by directing that defendant No.3-petitioner shall be granted one opportunity to lead its entire evidence on a date to be fixed by the trial Court at its own risk and responsibility and subject to payment of Rs.5000/- to the respondents as costs. It is, however, made clear that in case the petitioner fails to conclude its entire evidence on the date to be fixed by the trial court or to pay the costs as stipulated above, this revision petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed. November 4, 2011 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE