^ S-IMCILE sa IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) N0^M^-• 2011 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS 1. Man Singh Thakur, S/o. Shri Ramhu Singh Age 53 years, Presently posted as Revenue Inspector, at Land Record Branch, District Office District-Rajanandgaon (CG) ^ 2. Gajendra Singh Chandrawanshi, S/o. late Sukalu Singh Chandrawanshi, Age 55 years, Presently working as Revenue Inspector at Tahsil Dongargaon, R.I. Circle - Tumdibod, District-Rajanandgaon (CG) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director (Land Records), Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 3'. The Commissioner, O/o. the Coniraissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Collector, District-Rajnandgaon (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^'jsff'^'s ^-^ /I'ffe--.^ i ""'"'•ulll:;^ ^ w ^ vfsovay ^y ••'ssssss^. V^ -<. Aassl HIGH COIJRT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BII.ASPIJR WMT PETITION (8) No. 5148 of2011 Man Sin^i Thakxir & Another. VRRSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. RE.SPONDENTS WRTT PETmON IINDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF TIffi_CXW8Tm,mpN OF DTOIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Shashank Thakun Advocate forthe petftioners. Shri V.V.S. Mourlfay, Dqpuly Advouale General Ibr the State/respondents. Sliri S.P. Navrataa, Dy. Cuinmissioner (R), Bilaispur, is presenl. ORBKR(ORAL} (Passed on 06 day of September, 2011) At the very oiAset Shri Moorthy, leamed connsel atyearing for the Stote/respondents, on mstnictions, subnrite that the order dated 18,08.2011 (Annexure P/l) impugned herein, has not been passed by a competent autfaority in accordance with Rule 20, Part 11; of the Madhya Pradesh/ChhattisgaA Land Record Manuai, thus, the same is imsustamable in law and shaSl not be given effect to. In view of the above subnussion made i>v leanied State counwl, aceordme to teamed coimsel for the petitioners, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. Accordinely, tfae impugned order (fated 18.08.2011 (Annexure P/l) is quashed. However, iiberty is reserved to tiie State/r&spoudents to pass appropriate order, if " so advised, in accordaace with law, in adnuiustrative exigency and inpublic iaterest. 4. The writ petitioa is aJlowed. No order asto costs, Sd'- ,^^n Sa^A8cihsm judge 4 ItSL lcll!n"'--: