THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.10594 OF 2010 Dated 30th April, 2010 Between: M/s.Maruti Infraventures (India) Pvt. Ltd. …Petitioner And Secunderabad Cantonment Board and another …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.S.Sridhar Counsel for respondent No.1: Mr.Deepak Bhattachary Counsel for respondent No.2: ----- The Court made the following: Order: The grievance of the petitioner is that though the appeal filed by it against order passed by respondent No.1 directing stoppage of work is pending before respondent No.2, the said respondent has not been disposing of the appeal and the stay application. While the said appeal is pending, respondent No.1 has issued notice of demolition under Section 248 (1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006. In my opinion, the petitioner is entitled to protection against demolition as its appeal before respondent No.2 is pending. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.1 not to demolish the structure already raised by the petitioner. However, it is made clear that till disposal of the said appeal by respondent No.2, the petitioner shall not raise any further construction. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.13576 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 30th April, 2010 lur