CHS1044-10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1044 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO.163 OF 2009 Bank of Baroda .. Plaintiff Versus Anil Muneshwr Sharma and Ors. .. Defendants Mr.M.S.Sheela Mistry i/b. J.Patil for defendants. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 20th September 2010. P.C.: 1] It is stated that original defendant No.2 has expired and that is why his heirs and legal representatives are to be brought on record as per the schedule. The defendant No.2 expired on 6th July 2008 but this fact became known to the plaintiffs only when they received intimation from defendants’ Advocate on 26th November 2009. In these circumstances, the delay is properly and sufficiently explained. In such circumstances, the chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendments to be carried out within two weeks. Amended plaint be served on parties within four weeks thereafter. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)