, ^.'0;";;.. €^^- "yy' ^-^^. ..»*•" ^ ^" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARH) ^ WMT PETITION fC) N0. 0~^^ /2010 PETITONER: ItESPONDENTS: ^' !'^..: ,.^r .-:^ .^'" ^;-%> ^' if ^ ^- ii?; '^g;:e ^lsi f.y Devendra Kumar Tekam S/o. Late Vijay Kumar Tekam, Aged about 34 years, R/o. Village Bhoyna, Tahsil & District- Dhamtari (C.G.) Presently working as Personal Assistant in the office ofthe Advocate General at Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department ofRevenue, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Advocate General, Office ofthe Advocate General, High Court ofChhattisgarh Premises Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Tahsil Office, District-Dhamtari (C.G.) w^ ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA H IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION 10 N0.2679 OF 2010 ST'? Petitioner Devendra Kumar Tekam. Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri N.N.Roy, Advocatefor the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. 1. 2. 3. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on 25th day of September, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that this petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel appearing for other side does not controvert the above submission In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as havjng become infructuous. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge