IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 22ND MAGHA 1930 RPFC.No. 47 of 2006() --------------------- MC.136/2004 of 2004 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER/RESPONDENT ----------------------------------------- STEPHEN, S/O.GEORGE, AGED 49, KANNAMPILLIL HOUSE, KALLETTUMKARA.P.O, IRINJALAKKUDA VIA., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.ABDUL RAHIM RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS -------------------------- 1. GEORGE, AGED 18, S/O.STEPHEN, KALLETTUMKARA.P.O, IRINJALAKKUDA VIA., THRISSUR DISTRICT, (BECAME MAJOR ON 10.1.2006). 2. GOLDA MARIA,12 YRS.MINOR,D/O.STEPHEN, KALLETTUMKARA.P.O,IRINJALAKKUDA VIA.,THRISSUR DT., (MINOR GOLDA MARIA IS REP.BY GUARDIAN & MOTHER THRESSIAMMA,D/O.MUNDAKKAL CHATHUNNI, MATHUPALLIPPURAM DESOM,POYYA VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR,THRISSUR, NOW WORKING AT STENO.GR.I, MEAT PRODUCTS OF INDIA LTD. ,KOOTHATTUKULAM,ERNAKULAM ADV. SRI.T.N.MANOJ FOR R1,2 THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.P.(F.C.) No. 47/2006 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A1 : TRUE COPY OF THE M.C. 136/04 OF FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR. ANNEXURE A2 : TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER FILED IN M.C. 136/2004 OF THE FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR. ANNEXURE A3 : TRUE COPY OF THE SERVICE PENSION ORDER ISSUED BY THE LIEUTENANT COMMANDER TO THE REVISION PETITIONER DATED 27.3.1994 //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE R.P.(F.C.) No. 47/2006 ORDER ON CRL.M.A.No. 1757/2006 IN R.P.(F.C.)nO. 47/2006 DISMISSED. SD/- M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE 11.2.2009 //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. M.N. KRISHNAN, J ----------------------- R.P.(F.C).No. 47 OF 2006 --------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of February, 2009 O R D E R It is submitted by the counsel for the respondent that the revision petitioner is dead and the other matrimonial dispute M.F.A. 29/2003 was dismissed by the Division Bench of this court as infructuous. As the relief sought is personal, there is no point in continuing with the matter. Therefore the R.P.(F.C) is closed. If there is any mistake, the parties can approach this court for re-hearing. M.N. KRISHNAN,JUDGE vkm