IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 686 OF 2009 M/S. H.B. SINGH AND CO. ... Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF GOA AND 2 ORS. ... Respondent Mr. Amey Kakodkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.Bandodkar, Addl. Government Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- A. S. OKA & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 15th July, 2010 P.C.:- We have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State Government. Apart from the fact that this Petition involves disputed questions of fact, there is a dispute regarding a contract between the parties. Considering the involvement of disputed questions of fact, the remedy of the Petitioner is to approach the Civil Court by filing a Civil Suit. We, therefore, decline to entertain the Writ Petition. Petition is rejected by keeping the remedy of the Petitioner of filing a Civil Suit open. All the contentions of the parties are kept open. A. S. OKA, J. F. M. REIS, J. at*