1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1343/2009 (Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Gondia & another VERSUS Vijay Kumar Nirmulchandra Peshine) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M. Bute, counsel for the petitioners. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : JUNE 15, 2009. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. By this petition, the petitioners impugn the order passed by the Labour Court, Gondia directing the petitioner to pay the amount of Rs.5,759/- towards difference of pay and allowances. I have considered the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners and also perused the impugned order passed by the Labour Court. It appears from a reading of the order that the claim of the respondent for arrears of difference in salary was based on Government Resolution dated 08.06.1995. The Labour Court found that in view of the Government Resolution, the respondent was entitled to an amount of Rs.5,759/- towards difference in salary for the period from 01.01.1996 till 30.11.1999. Though a ground 2 was raised by the petitioners before the Labour Court that the Zilla Parishad, Bhandara was a necessary party to the proceedings, the same was rightly rejected by the Labour Court as for the period from 01.01.1996 to 30.11.1993, for which the claim was made, the respondent worked with the petitioner Zilla Parishad and not with the Zilla Parishad Bhandara. The order does not suffer from any serious illegality so as to interfere with the same. In the result, the petition fails and is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE APTE