1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application (APPP) No. 298 of 2009 in Criminal Application (APPP) No. 299 of 2009 in Criminal Application No. 3241 of 2008 (D) Pradeep Wamanrao Wankhade and others ..VERSUS.. State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O., P.S., Teosa. Dist. Amravati and another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. R.D.Wakode, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. Bhagwan M. Lonare, A.P.P. for respondent/State. CORAM : Prasanna B. Varale, J. DATED : 2 nd Febru ary , 2011 . Heard Mr. R.D.Wakode, learned Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Bhagwan M. Lonare, learned APP for Respondent no.1/State. This is an application for condonation of 69 delays delay in filing an application for restoration. Perused the application. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed. Delay of 69 days is condoned. Criminal Application (APPP) No. 299 of 2009 Heard. This is an application for restoration of Criminal Application No. 3241/2008, which was dismissed for want of prosecution by order dated 09/7/2009. Perused the application. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed. Criminal Application No. 3241/2008 is restored to the file. 2 Criminal Application No. 3241 of 2008. Heard. By consent of the parties, the application is taken up for hearing. The application was filed in the year 2008. Learned APP for the respondent/State submits that in this matter, the investigation is concluded and the trial is commenced. Therefore, nothing remains in the application. Perused the record. It reveals that there is no interim order operating in this Court, except releasing the applicant in the event of arrest. In view of above facts, nothing remains in the application. The application has become infructuous. The application is, therefore, disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE Diwale