CLCON No. 120 of 2003 Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. Heard Sri Nagesh Aggarwal learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri N.P.Shah learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. The contempt petition was moved with the allegation that the compliance of the order dated 22.3.2003 has not deliberately been made by the respondent. Annexure-CA-3 to the counter affidavit is the decision taken on the representation of the petitioner. The respondent No.4 was directed to decide the representation on merit by speaking order and this appear to have been done by the respondent No.4 by passing the said order dated 14-8-2003 (Annexure- C.A.-3). There is no disobedience of the order of the Court and the compliance has been made. Considering this the contempt petition is dismissed. Notice discharged. (Irshad Hussain, J.) Dated: 18-10-2003 ISB