1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.13 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2061 OF 2008 Ashyana (Andheri Pachim) SRA Coop.Housing Ltd. & Anr. .. Petitioners Versus Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Ors. .. Respondents and Shakeel Hasan Patni .. Contemnor. Mr.S.G.Surana for petitioners. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 16th March 2009. P.C. . The grievance of petitioner who has filed this contempt petition is that the writ petitioner has not abided by his statement before the Division Bench. 2. The Coop.Society has provided the writ petitioner with temporary accommodation and he 2 has not shifted to the same as yet. He has not shown his willingness to accept the rent for temporary accommodation also. 3. In my view, the order of this Court does not spell out any direction or command to the writ petitioner. It merely disposes of the writ petition on the basis of writ petitioner’s statement that he will approach authority and satisfy them about his eligibility for accommodation. 4. Now, despite the willingness of the society, if the writ petitioner has not come forward to accept the benefit of the scheme or is unwilling to shift to a temporary accommodation, then, it would be open for the writ petitioner to initiate such steps in accordance with law and scheme to exclude the writ petitioner from the scheme. That is an aspect which will be dealt with under the scheme and relevant laws and it 3 cannot be subject matter of the contempt petition. 5. Keeping open all remedies so also reserving rights of the petitioner to proceed against the original petitioner, contempt petition is disposed of. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)