-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.402 OF 2004 APPEAL NO.402 OF 2004 APPEAL NO.402 OF 2004 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: JULY 24, 2006. JULY 24, 2006. JULY 24, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Borkar for the Appellant. The Appeal is by the unsuccessful Plaintiff. The Courts below have recorded a concurrent finding that the Appellant-Plaintiff has failed to prove that he was the owner of the suit property and was in possession thereof. In view of the concurrent finding of fact, no substantial question of law arises. Second Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Judge. Judge. Judge.