IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE No.1153 of 2010 (Contempt Case U/s. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondent herein for violating, disobeying the Order of the High Court dated 18.08.2009 in WP.No.17010 of 2009.) BETWEEN V. Rajedran. ... PETITIONER AND Sri P.V. Sybramanyeswara Reddy. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. V. JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: ORDER: This contempt case is filed alleging violation of the order dated 18.08.2009 passed by this Court in WP.No.17010 of 2009. By the said order, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chittoor, was directed to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 31.07.2009 and pass appropriate orders thereon within a period of four weeks. Till such time, the post of fair price shop dealer of Marripalle village, S.R. Puram Mandal, Chittoor District was directed not to be filled up on permanent basis. 2. It is now stated by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies that under proceedings 09.10.2009, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chittoor, rejected the petitioner’s representation dated 31.07.2009 on the ground that his resignation had already been accepted. 3. In view of the aforestated developments, no willful disobedience to the orders of this Court is established. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the proceedings dated 09.10.2009 passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chittoor District, he would necessarily have to seek redressal of his grievance by way of independent proceedings in accordance with law and the same cannot be made the subject matter of enquiry in this contempt case. The contempt case is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ SANJAY KUMAR, J April 21, 2011 DSK