416 TliE HIGH COURT Ol711 1NJA13ANIO IlARYANA AT 11V CHANDIGARII e P1 414 DateoI l Iecislolll Mlirclll 2011 1 1 1A Noe730llf2009 611 Shashi Kumar and others Appellants VelS CommissionerHaryiiitiiaild others 1PA Noe731of2009 21 ShashiKuinar andothers lppellants 1 rrsus FinancialCommissionerHaryniIaaIldotllcrs espotldents 31 1PA N00732of2009 ShashiKumar ippellant Il SllS FinancialColnmissioner Hayililliiltlclotllers espondents 41 I11A No733 of2009 ShashiKumar and others Ippellants VerslIS Financial Commissioner aild otllers Respondents 51 1IA No734 of2009 ShashiKumar and others Appellailts VerSllS 1 Financial Commissioncr IOIlirYlilltl and otllers espondcnts KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 417 l 661 LPA N00735of21109 V ShashiKunlar and others lppellants Versus FinancialCommissionerHaryanaand espondents 679 CWP Nto111684of2001 Surtaetc Petitioners VersllS Stateof Harvanaand others 89 CWl Noe15051of2001 BangiRanl andanother etitioners Versus State0 Harvanaandothers espondents 1 91 WP No18577 of2001 ShashiKumar andothers Petitioners VCiSllS 1 Stateo f Haryana and others espondents 101 CWP N0012353of1991 Om Parkash andothers e e PetitionCrS Iiersus State of Harvanaand others Respondenls 111 RSA No47 of2009 Nathi Ram and another lppellant VersllS ShashiKutnar eRespondent KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 418 3 121 RSA N11e2748 tlf 21109 9rj Surtaand others e e Appellallt r1 VerSUS Chhaviand others e a e 6131 RSA Noe2749of 2009 Dauli lppellant VersllS ShashiKumar espondent 143 RSA Nr1e2750of 2009 Maln Clland and others lppellant Vel 9US Divva Respondenl 151 KSA NlIl755 of2009 Doli Appellant Versus 1 PardeerKunoarand others 2espondents 161 RSA No2756 of 2009 Nathi Ram and another Appellants Versus PardeepKulnar and othei5 e Respondent5 1 7 RSA No2757 of 2009 Sauni Oevi Appellailt Versus PardeepKumar and Illlt41S espondenlS KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document l 419 9 RSANo2758 of 2009 d Surta AppellalllS l Vcrsus i Komar andothers espondents 6191 RSA No2759 of 2009 Sohan al and others Appellants Versus Kumar andothers espondents 201 RSA No2760 of 2009 J KreshniIOevi andothers lppellants VersUS Kumar and othels espondents 211 RSA Nol761 of 2009 Purall lppellant Versus PardeepKutnar andotllcrS 22 RSA Nol762 of 2009 Mam Chand andothets lppellant Versus PardecllKumar and IllllerS 2espondents CORAM HONBllll MRe JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HONBlaIC MRa JtlSllCE GURDEV SlNGH 1 Whether Reportersclf lcIcal papers may be allowed to sec thc judgmCrlt7 2 To be referred to Ille Reporters or not7 3 Whether the judgiilrbilt shotlld he reported ln the Digest2 V KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document e6 420 NllsRDBawa RandhirIlllwa Sallluelliill and Presentl 5 Shashi GuptaAdvocatesf01tllc in LPA Nos30 to 735 0121109 IvlrA1CChopraSr Advlll ale wllll Mr HarminderSinghAtlvlIcate for the inCWP Nos 2353of lt1tIl 15051and 18577of 2001 MlsLNNerma andKirail Pal SinghAdvocates forthe In CWl No 10684of2001 Ms ShubhraSlnghDAl t l IiuyanaIor thc Statc Mr BhagSinghAdvocllle forthe in RSA Nos747 to 2750and 2755 to 2762of2009 HEMANT GUPTAJ This ordershall dls1119eof aforenlentioned22 cases arislng out of surplusland case 111Onl Parkash since deceasedl All other cases exceptCWP Nos Ill684 aild 150510f0f2001 aild CWP No 185772001perlainto Illc siulclong oflnutation either on account of purchaseof land ti9 teiIants area or thc settingasideofthe saidorders Ile tllreewrit petitionslnentioned J above are the cases in which IlItlissuesregarding surplusland of 1 Olll Parkashis to be exatnined Learned counsel Ioi tlle joarties ugreethat decision in the said three writ petitionswtliild govem the remaining cases as well and such cases can be disjIoscd of i111tcrms of the decision 111 thc aftncsaid writ petitions CWP Nos10684 f2001 and 15051 of2001 are bv some of the tenants who are tliiillling righl to purchaseIand as the tenants permissiblearea cll Ilig ItindeerIwtler Om Parkash Thc petitionerstherein have chiillengedtlie orders dated 29091 997 KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document r4 421 2 101999 8e 2403 2000 by 111eSpecialCollector and the Fincllltal InlnIissioner CWP Nt18577 of 2007 is Olctl bythe legalheirsof deceased Onl Parkash thc IiforcstIid 1rders which arc also subjcct matter ofchallenge in IllealIresaid two writ petitions The 1itS tlre that Om Parkash big lant owner uas holdingland 111Iifferetlt villagesnamely Mc2ndebriSughGaloli Dasiiiii ilild He submittedllis selectioll in Fornl E in acctIrIanccwith Rule 3 61of the Punjab Securit of Land Tenures Rliles 1956 tr short the RulcsI and sent the said fonn under Ieislerecl pclsl on 191958 to lhc Collector Ambala It was Ieadedby hitn in earlier writ petltlOll CWP 873 of 19871 thiil ivere sent to the Collcctor lor the reason that no Special1tllleclor was appointed till theexpityof SlX rnoilths After the said seIection the Collectorpassedan ordcr on 09171960 The said ortlIlrreodsas underl Present Iiiiid clwner witll counsel According to Fonll O the Iand owIier wned 101 SA 71 units of land Ill 15041 953andIic4Iwlis 1209A 6al12unitsat present Addiilg area 1 SA 11114IiIiitsin villogeMondebriand5 SA 9i2 unils Ill tlwtIedIly Ille lalid owner on 1541953 which hasbeen sclltl thellltal area with theIandowller conoes to 127 54 11 8 Iltlils 11l11ofthisthe foliowing areai under tenants 119 911c1w11 111 1IIe 1lrtn D relatingto the land ownerl Jagadhri Sl 112 units Mandebri 62 SA 1912 units Sugh 1 SA 52 units Galoli 36 SA 2114 units Dasani 2SA 11e114units Farrakllpur 5SA 9112 units 119SA 14 units KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 422 Inaddition6 unilsol IailtlIlre titllleiorchordin Villagc 4 Mandebri Deductingarett unilettlle telliillls nnd theorchard the area witb 1le lItld owiler ls lcss than hi area There isthclrIllreilll Surplus area with Ihe landownerThecase be flledr Announced09J7960 Sd O01IecltIrJagadhri In the saidorder 110 areawas ltIundwith thc lancvowneras after the tenitnls area and the areaof orchard the Iandwith tlle lalitlnIwller wlls foulld to be less than the area After the ortler wits solne ot thetenallts flled for purclllise tlf laild iillder Section18 ofthe Punjab Securityof Land TeiitiIes Act 19534for shori thc Act Thc learned Assistant CillccttIr vidc its order dated 29Ol1c969 ofthe the oa soughtto be by some of the tenants WilS Ivithinthe reservedarea tIf theOm Parkash In appealagalnst1he said order by the tenant theIearncdCollector renlandedthe ises t0 tllc Assistant CoJlecttr to examine the questionthat wllell ler the tellants are Iiable to land if the reservatiotlis iiol illaclealordingto Iaw aild whether such land belongsIo 1lle pcrinlssiblc area of the Ian owner The anIlrllerJil2121969 thattheIand owncr has sent his selection lorI Il Ivilh the lorm A and C to tlle Collector ln the year 1958 but tlIe Iandowner has sold land in Village Binat Tehsil Thanesai Ilislrict Karna1 Therefore this case was to be dccided by Speial tollector It was inculnbetll UlOOll Iindowner to send his lIlnls to Special Collector undcr Sectloll 5A and 5B ofthe Act aiItl urIilerRules 3 and 40fthe Rules 1 and thc forms have been selll Wltlllglylllcrefore no action IS KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 423 5red on those fomis Ill tlle appealagainst the saidorder thc t ComlnissionerIiI 15Il1970directedthe partlesto appear beforetlleSpecialCollectr 1r remdecision Alter thesaidordcr the leamed llcctor passed an order on 12091 972 declarilul14standard iis llIe IaiIdsurplusin the hands of big landmou ner The ltgtIinst the saidorder was dismissedbv Commiloiler on 22 Il 973 13utthe leamed Financial vide its oIder dated182974 returnedthe mattcr to the Collcctor iIller rcjectiilgappealof the landowncr Financialltjn1issionerdirectedtheSpecial COlleclOr to look into threepoinlstlelincatedby him in the said order The ill 01 land nleiisiIriilg194 kanals 14 Marlas situaled Village I3inatfromlanthlIvnerIlled a writpetition before this court 6CWP 6859 of 19741I llis court 9et aside the order of Special Collecloron 13 1978 so as to decide the claim ofthe as well Thc Collcctor thereafterreedeterlnincd the surpluscase oflhe Itn Pnrlcasll nn 06081979 The appeal 1 was dismissed on 21ll l 1981 loe Financial Comlnissioncr dismissed thc revision 1111221986 The order passedby the Financl11Colninissionei IlItis beforethis Court in CWl No873 of 1987 bv Oln liIrkash 11lis Court remitted the matter tu the Financial Commissii1tIr lir redecision in accordance with 101 and in the Iightof obsetviiticltls made tllerein as the order passcd bv the 12inancial ColnlnissiutIer Ivas found to be without allV reasons he learned l initllcltll tIlllIlllSSlOller acceptedthc revision 011 16091995 Illc releviltl extract from thc said order reads as under KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 424 S The second poultiiI wllich l flnd a Iot of meritis the 11 that ll is the purchase of the r 4 tenantthat the surllllltareit case of tlle land owner lia5 to beopcntd 1lis is a verydoubtful to lnvinind Even if lt Ivils 10 bc opened it couldnot havebeen donewithouttheapprlItitl 01thehigherauthorityAdmittedl noapproval hasbeentIIIIaitiedwhiiereviewing thesurplus area caseof theIancllordwllich had acquired flnalityon 971960 Thewrilten argutnetttsulItniltedby the do nol seemto carrymuchcinviction I anl flrmlyof theview that on thesetwo counts alrIiitItllc revisioilpetitiollshouldsuccecd Theordersdated 6 K 1979and 20Ol1981 of the Assistant Colleclorand the Oonimissioncrare sel aside renlandthe case biiI to lhe SpecialCollector for de noltl determinationbyiss1ii1iR nuticesto both thepanies Thepresentround1Il is basedupon the ordcr passed by the Special Colleclil1 011 2909 1997 after the aforesaid order uf the Financial Conllnissioner he Iearned Special Collector held to the followuIg rllect l am fully ln itgIleenlent with the learned counsel iIr landowner lhc ordeldtIted16091995is verymuchclear In orderdated090711611slirplus areu case ofthe landownerwus decidedandheld 11101 totiil area of thelandownerwas 127S 1 118units Outoi IlIIstllefcllowing areas was undertcnai Villa Arell SA Units Jagadhri 614 Mandebri 62 12314 Sugh 112 Galoli Ill 2114 Dasani 7 ll114 Farrakhplll 1 9112 119 14 ln addition l 6 utlitsof land as under orchard in villagc Madabri reducingIll ell under the tenants and the orchard the area witll thc Ilulcli Iwner retnaitls Iess than his permissiblc area ThereafterilIll Illg pllrchaseproceedings It was dctecled that the IandowneirIlso IirJldsland in villageMandi and Bint i11Other4115trici111ejlilsitionregarding thesc tw Cl villagesis as undet1 KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 67 425 3 Village Areil Remarks SA lJilit r1 Mandi 1 1172 Purchasedby tenants under Section18ofthe Act SA Unit Bint 47 15114 llnderold tenant 30 14l4 soldupto30338 8 13 3 4 Banjar 6 3314 47 15441 ln the Illlllttlf tlle ahove discussionseven if areas 01 othertwo villIge5IS countedi n the total holdingso f Ille IandownerIlle remainsthe same ie with No SurlolllS Area aller lillowing30 SA of area as perhis clloict 1he renlaing area is declared as tei1a1115 alct l order lhe ordcr IlilssedIly lllte SpeciaiCollector WilS affirmedln appealon J2 10 999 bv the learnedCominissioner The learned Commissioi11 t71undthat two pointsremain lo 10e decide Firstlythe ofform F and SecondlywlhatlS theeffect of death of lailtItlwiler lt found that the merits of the case are not affected by Illll Ilreloarlilglorm F and that no such pleahas been raised il behttlf 01 lhe landowner that the calculationsinade are inctlticl in liil tnanner ln respectof the ofdeath ofllle IaiIdotvneron 19071992 the leamed Commissioner found that llIe hcirs nf the landownerfrom 1992lill 1997had not moved any iillIllicillion before the SpecialColleclor llO took any other to t110taiilthe benefit of reopening ofthe case ofsurplus ThereortIhelegalheirsofthelandowncr had no rightto make sucll clEiInl Ill 811 appealfor the first tiine ln rcspectof pleaof the tenat114 lll tlIe appealthat the order datcd 0907 1960 is a nullity lt lllet the 14ighCourt and tllc Financial Commissionerhave IIeld this order to be valid and that therightsofthe tenants are n41 Iffccted as tlle tenants permissible KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Il 426 wouldremain intact The Finaiteiol Oommissionerhas rea 4ismissed the revision in linline on 24Il 2000 The legalheirsof lhe IalldiIwilcriil their writ petition 171 No18577 of 2001 have soughtsettli aside oltlle orders dated 29091997 12101999 and 2i03201111 It is specillcpleaded casc of the lesialheirs of the Iandownerthiil the tIrdcrdated0907 1960 has attained flnalityand could not 1c specially in the initiated bv l Ile tenanls I7herelevant averments in 13ofthe writ Ilclilioilretidas under 6aj Becatlse lhe ortlel tlIited July 9 1960 Annexure P havingattainedthe finalifycotIldrlot be rceopened especialll in thepurchase proceediilg ItIiliiitetlllyIlletetlants tb9 Because although Nol in para No of lu order Annexure Pl4 ha Itutld ond heltl fhat the order dated July9 1960hadattalncdIinalitynd the saiddecisionCalllllll be and lltl LIliillgecItIld bc madeby the Speciill Collector Haryanaill tliIiIe yct lIe erred in dismissing thc appealflled bythe Icl Because the orilri Annexure Pll havingnot becll challenged byanyone ititludulglhC teilantsandthe State thc authoritiesare to Ivotklitil tlieif rightswithin thc atnbit01 tiIc saidorderand tillder lltl Ilrtlvlsiclil Ilf Iitw thesame couldbe r opened Duringthe COUrSC IIl arguinents lhe partieswere a iden2in respectofselectionmiIdr bythe landownerin form E 0 tl 1906 1958 1e afterthe insertiilll 11Seclicln5A 5B and 5C in tlle Acl vide PunjabAct NoA6 1111957 The stlid fact is admitled Ill the wril ten statement flled on 1131ia1r clf SpecialCollector Haryalla Ill the 10resentset ofwrit pelltionsand noticed in thc order datcd 23121969 passedby the Ct110c10r attaclled in earlier writ pctition ftled bv lancowner lt 18 DlS41recorded in the order datcd KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 12 427 311lJ1987 bv the Dili IoiI 13encllof lhis Court in the said VeP as well as in thc Irdcrpassed bythe SpecialCollector Wrlt on 291191997 Mr Serliclr Advocate appearingOll behalf of the legalheirs I Il thc Iantlowner arguedthat thc for the declaritfilInrIf suiplusland of the landowncr shall bc deelned to be tItl lhe clateof commencement Clf Thc Harvana Ceiling of Liiltl l loldingsAct 19726 for short the ActJ thercforetlle orea case of Om Parkashhas tobe decidedin ternls of5eliIIil 33021iilofthe HaryanaAct reod with Section 10A0bl 01tllc Acl Il is argued that the order passcd bythc specialCollcctor i tItIt stislIiiltilllc as the SurpluS area Of lhc land 0i0InedbyOm Parki1s1 1 is to be reieterminedallcr A his death on 19 1992 i 15 tJI 1 tlle said date the land was 1101 utilized It is argued thitt Ihe Ionclcan be said to be utilized only 1 whcn is hantIctloIver 10 the tenants after allotment o f Iandatld on completion tlflllhcr fonllalities The ordet ofallotl1lcilt J itsel f does not amount lO llle coillpletionof the process 0 utilizatlon Reliance is plIicetlupon tlle Honble SupremeCouil judgnlcntreportedas PIitliitcitll Ctlmmissioner Haryana aitd others Vs Smt Kela Ilcvi and another AIR 1980 SC 30 Krishnu Kumari and unother VseStute ofHarvana and another 1999 11SCC 338 and ujlon lLill Betlch udgmentofthis Coun Ill Smt Aiit Kaur and otherr Vs The Puniab State and others 1980 PLJ354 Jt is alscl arIlletltllat lllc tlrder passcdby the Financiil Comnlissloner on 16Ilt1 19J5 rcnlandingthc case to tlle Special KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 4 428 ollectorfor de novo determination l ileelned lor re determiniltionof surplus case of the IiiittlownerOiIl 1arkash Thus parttf land would be available 111r by thc tenants as no thesurplusland area is to be deterlniiletliti lhc Iltinclsclf legalheirs ofOmParkashand not as in thehandsofllin Parkash RelianceIS placedupon Antu Vs Naresh Saran 2001 1 RCR ivill Anoop Singh and otherr Vs The Stute ofHarvana und otlters2008 21RCR ICiviO62l lDllmPb atid Sardara Sin and otlicrs Vs The Financial Conunissioncr and others2008 RCR Civi0744 Full BenchmPble It ls arguedthat tlie otrlcr dated 09171 960 has been passedby the Collector thougllllle StlrlllllScasc of the landowncr was required to be decided bySllt7cilil Collectorin tenns of Rule 4B ofthe Rules as thc land ofdelcised biglaildowner was situated ln more than one district and 1Iliil for declarationclf surplusIand ofOm ParkashshlIll Ile tleemedlo be pendingalso fclr the reason that form F hasnr11lleeil prepared Reliance is placed uponGurdial Sinh iedJbv Iii LRs Vs State ofHarvana1999 ll RRR 54SBPBncwop SiIlghtind others Vs The Slote ofHarrllna and others2008 2l RCR Cillill 626DB Pb Mr LNVerma AdvtJcolc Clll behalf of the tenalllS arguedthat Order dated 91160 carlnot be said to be void or without iurisdictiononly fol Ilie 1ellstln lhat the same was joasscd bv Col lector and not by SpeoialCollectclr and that surplus Iand case callnol be reopenedfol Ilic siiid reasoll thoughthe selcction 01 the lanIowner should have lleetl inilde ktlown to the partieslt is also thc case of the tenailts thill seleclltl of a permissiblearea KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1L1 ee 429 ulice madeb the IoIidownercannot be eitherbythe acl of or by of Iaw exceptwith the written consent 01 lly the cllange Learnedcounsclalso reliccl 1 the teniilltS 6 a I9ilision IltiiclI of this Court as Laland others Vr Stnle ol Harvanaand others2001 I1 PLJ 148 andKanrla Devi und otItersVseStateofHarpana and others2010 621 SLJ PcOHIIlI l Il is that the land vests with StateOll the cointnencemenl 01 IaryonaAct thereforethe surplus land arca casecantlot bere3tennined AfterhaviilgIleatd leamedcounselfor the panicsat some lcngth we fliicl that the followingquestions arisc lor COllSidcratior i1 WlletllerIllc order dated0907 960 passcdby tllc Collector in respectof surplusarea of Olll P2trkasllis llnal and 1111 Wllethettlle land was ureutilized on 1907 1992 1Ce the date of deathof Om Parkash therefore tlle surplusIand area was requiredto be rcm dclermined in terms of Section 33 of the 1 1llryiulaAct readwith Section 101 oflhc Act iii l Wllether the tenants arca delerlnilled in order dated 9 1960 vests Ivith tctlailts atld stand utilized on the said dalc itself7 ll tloiIsider the respcctiveargumentsof thc Icarncd courlscl for tlle ptuties tllc relevant provisionsof the Punjab Securitv of1117enurcs Act1953 and Rules framed thereunder and thc provisitlt1s clf the HuryanaCeilingdf Land HoldingsAet 1972 need to Ile cxlriictetl Such provisionsread as underl hr PIlnjabSeellrityofLand Tenures Act 1953 KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document l S 430 Ae Declaration SuplllIl ted Ily Aflldavits To Be Vurnished ByCertain Lamlowners Atl lcnants Ever r 1 or tenant who owns or holds lluid in excess of thc area andwhel 1Iild is silualedin more thanollc Patwarcircle shall 81rnisllvithIllo perirId tIf six monthsfrotll thecomlnencement of thc 1unjahSeciJlityof Land Tenure5 Act 191l ti declartitioiI by a1l affidavitin respectof tlie I2iiIclrwiietl tlr held byhim in such formand nlanner andl sIich as may be 5Be Selection of Ptlrnlissilllc Area itrId of Failureto Selectl 11A Iandownerwho has not exercisedh rightof reservationtIilderIlIisAct may selecthis area and intimate11t selectionlr the authoritl wlthintheperiodspetillcdin Section5A andin suchformaild nlanneras may be p05crllJed Providedfllol li l111dtlwner wJlois required to furnishil declarationullder 5eclloll 5neAshalI intimate his selection alongwith tllat dtlcliraticn 121 lf a Iandwnel fails 101select his permissible area 111 accordancewJlh llle lvisions of subesectionl l l tllc inaysubject to the 01SectionS C selectthepaIrelIIr tlteparcelsofla17dwhich suchpcrsoi7tS entitledto retaiIIunder llIe provisions ofthis Act1 ProvilltadIhot the ilrescri bed authority shall not maAe the selectit111 lvithoul givirigthe landowner concerned 7tll opportunity rIl bciiigIieurd 5C Penalto FlIr Fttilure i o Furnish Declaration I I I il a landownerrr teiiarlt fails to furnishthedeclarationsupported by an altlrlavit as requiredby Section 5l the prescribcd aulhrJrily 1111tbeltlwtlterankofControliermay byorder direcr lhiil thewllole cIr patl til theland Of suchlandownetoi teili1t in eXces of Ien standardacres to bespeci6edbysuchauthorit shall he deeined to bcallie surplusarea of such Iandownertll lenalll illld sllall hc tItilizedby theStateGovernmentlclr tllc PlllTlllSe iit 9ection 10A XX xxxx 1110A0SurplusArea For Resettlement of EjectcdTenanls tal 1Iie 9tfile lillvertlment or any ofOcer cmpowered bv it in tliis Ilehllli sllall be competent to utilize anv SurplusaretI fol tlle t esettiemeut of tenant ejectedor to bc ejectedunder claIlSC Iij ofsuhesectiuriI l l ofSection 9 KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 16 431 b l inylllingcotllainedin any otherIaw f01 thetinlebeingin ft i e aIIdsave in tlle case of land acquired h10 1 r 175 theStateGovernntetllUilder iny Iaw for thetimebeingin forcc J 1 or byan heirby iiiIicritiincenu transferor other of landwhich is itl surplIis area at the commencement ofthisAct shallitlfcl lhe ulili7tion thereofinclause urh iitiIizniin 01 any surplusarea will nul cffct theright t I illc IoildrIwiicltcI rcceivercnt Oonltllc lelliilll so settled ThePunjallSrtIri of Land enures Rules 1956 Form elc tIf tlcclaratitIn under Section5eAof tlle Act 1J Thc deelillalllIil by an afOdavitrequired to bc furnisheduItler SettlcltlSl tf theAct shallbe furnishedbl 1 lalodeoWnel Ill A alld l and by a tenanl in FormsB alld C either per91Inally11 by registered post due tol Ial IlIe0 nlIeclor01thedistrict ifhis landis situatedin 91icll ptitwarclrcles as are compriscdwithin OllC rlistrictlaiid Ibl Ille 9pecial1t7llcclor if his Iandis situatedill Sucll palwiircircies ns are conlprisedin tnore thancIne distric 4Be lrlcrilled autliorityunder subesection21of Section 5B anrl Seetiton5mCrlf the Act for the purposeof suhe sectioii 1 I rf Sectiofi S13 and Section 50Cclf the Act the autlltIrity sllall be a I l tlieCtllleclor if thelandsownedor heidbv o iande ownei rr lenant are slluate in palwarcirclescomprised Itl Oile distrt11alltl 4111 tlleSpecialCollectorifthe Iandsownedor hcld OV a ianllwncror teilunt arc situatein patwarcirclesctnnprised lll mnIe IhaIione district Assrssment of surplus are with landowners and telllllits XXX XXX XXX 1ll Iil 1Ile ClIllecturor the SpecialColiector shall preJlarc11 vtnIetnentirl fonn J and forward a copy tllereol tcl llit IalIdtJwnerIlt tenant concerncd under cover 0 eilllorsetllellt prescribed in thc Form and it shali be served uptlll tlIe laildownetor tenant as if it were a sumtnons in t17emilnller 1iesclilIetlin 9ection 90 ofthe PunjabTenant Act 1887 KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document I7 432 heSpecilil llollet llr 5IluIIillscIIrlrwarda copy of Form l 111 by hiin to tIlr1Collectti t1I everydistrictin which thc v1 v51 ur tenant ts situate rl arca oftlle IiillllilWllel TheHarvana CeiliIIg01lantl llllltlingAct 1972 2 Vestingof area IlI The surplusareaut 0 shall Il tllt rl tlledltleun whichit is declaredas such shallbe deetnetl to have Ileeti acquiredby the State for il IltillllcplirplIsel iide Act No1 7 01 19761 and all rights I itle iiiid itlterest ncludingthe contlilgenl interestif atly IeCllgleillv Illlylaw custotn or usage for thc tinle beingi n l I l r c l t11all lIerstIllsln such area shail statld alId iclI riglitslitlc undinterestshall vesl in the State GovernnlentfreclIrotnany encumbrance 129TloerighIiIiid itIleresl c11the tenant in his surplus arcil hich is inclutlrll thereriilissible area of the Iandowncr shallstandextlilpislIed Ol lhe IUCII tleclaredsllrlllllsor tenans arcil uioder the PuillrillIalioandIlie area declaredsurplusunderthe PepsuLilw v hicli hlis rlrIt so far vested in the Stalc I Ile deemedto have vestedin the Statc Govemmenlwilh efferi fronl the appointed dayand the aroa whichnllly IltI 911tleclittediIilderthePunjablaw le Pepsu lawaftertlle rlpplliilted duy liall be deemedto Ilavevestedin thc State l IiVelIllllCJll UIIlll effect from the datc 01 such declaratiolItVidc Aet NoI clf 197617 J 33 Repealund Savings XXX Xxx 2I oil the lor tlledetenninationofthe surplus arcil pending belore lhe commencement of this Act underthtI jllllvisilIiIs 111eitherof the said enactnlents which shallbe coitIinuedanddisposedoffas it thisAct had not becn passeduntIthesurplus area so determinedshall vest in andbe utilized lI tlIc StateIltIvemmentin accordancewith the prtlvisitnts 01IlIisAct he Sclleillc clf Ilic Act includingthc SCOpetlf Secticllts 5A 543 81 5e insened by PunjabAct No6 of 1957 came up for consicleratonI3el7rethe Honble Supreme Coun 1110 j udgnlcrttreportedll S Iuiput Rui and others Vse The State tlf Puniab and others AIR 19815C 1401 Intheaforesaid case OIIC KUMAR SURESH SHAM LAL 2012.11.14 11: 06 True Scanned Copy of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 433 theclilestion decidedis i11resptct If tllc efJict of intlmaliollill e1 57orm E made to the ColiectlIr lt 2 WllS held that intimation In Form1 is about a selection 111tlle area