< ^ IN THS HISH COURT OF JQBICATURE AT BIIASPUR € • Petitic^ners .^^ \^^ <.''' -<.-' ^«^- './- c^v\ <:>- ^>^ov" '^-,,^ (C.S.) W.P. No'.~'~ OF 2002 1. Bal Chand Kachhwaha aged about 66 years S./o ShriHarisingh Kachhwaha R/o 2'/0, Sunder Naqar, Raipur (C.G.) :?- S<P- Pand^y a.ged about 65 years S/o Shri Ram Kurnar Pandey R/o Ravi Nacrar Raipur (C<G.) 3. S.K. Shlnde aged about 65 years S/o Shri D.N. Shinde R/o Plot No. D/41, Ward No. 35, H.Mo. A/462, Sector-T^ Tagore Nagar Raipur (C.G,) 4. G.D. Bajpai oged about 66 years y/o yhri Shivnath Bajpai R/o Bcirciipdru^ Kciiikcillp^rd^ Purani Basti^ Ralpur (C*G.) b. H.S. Shukla aged about 66 years S./o Shri BrijBhushan Shukla R./o II No. 17^ Nagar Marg^ Near Maharashtra Bhawan, Choube Colony^ Raipur(C.G.) 6, S-D. Bha-rtiya- aged about 64 years S./o Ram Lal Bliarliya R/o 25, (Shala Marq) Choube Colony Raipur(C.G») "^ -^—z^ ^.. •-f y Respoadents 7. R.K. Pandey aged about 64 years S/o Shri Bhuv<7an Lal Pandcy R/'o C/13 M.P.H.B. Sector-1 Shankar Nagar, Raipur(C.y.) 8. R.K. Gomastha aged about 65 years S/'o Shri Sadhulal Gomastha R/o 48/351, Lohar chowk, Purani Basti, Raipur (C.G.) 9. K.K. Ghosh aged about 65 years S/o latc S*K» Ghosh R/o Lane No. 4, New Shanti Nagar^ Ralpur (C.G.) 10. C.P* Katiyar aqed about 6'b years S/o Shri R.P. Katiyar R/o c/43, Tagore Nagar ^^cr.or~5 Ralpiir (C-G-) 11. Mohd. Raf ique agcd about 66 ycars S/o H.C. Mia R/o Byron Bazar Raipux' (C.G.) 12. K.C. Jain aged about 65 years S/Q Not known R/o Chhotapara Raipur(C.G.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secre.ta.ry Department of Education DKS Bliawaii^ RdipLir (C.G.) ^.^Sic.i^iSwi-'E.assisas,^ ^s— 'T~r < 2. Coramissioner HiahQr Education Govcrnmcnt of Chhattisaarh DKS Bhawan, Raipur 3. Durgci EdiicciLloii SocleLy Raipur» through The President Durqa Post Graduate Colleqe Raipur (C.G.) 4< Th<=i Pnncnpal Durga Post Graduate College Raipur PBTITIOH MlTICIiBS \^"' 226/227 OF SHB CONSTITUTIGN OF ZNDIA FOR ISSUANCE OR ASPROPRI&TE •WRITS/OEDERS AKD DISECTIONS: XI-HC-22 ST^T'qFT [<vlJ<=h 3T1^T 9b+lict) ^fia ^ ^pc "3^ ^ll^lld^, ^nl^^Ko, [^<ni^li< 3^T XT^? _ ,__ ^,,^,,1-^^/^0 •^ 200 ^(1Wf[T 9h*1ich 'fN^T' 37T^T'^IT^R: ^TfN 30-6-2QQ4 Shri Sandeep Dtibey^ Advocat4 forthe petitioners. Shri Yashwant Sin^i, Govt. A^tvocate for the i^ate. Shri Gautam Bhaduri, Advoca^e for the responderit No. 4. Heard. Counsel for the petitioners sub^Mtted that petitk settled in accordance witfi the pay prays that m similar mattCT bearing ^ passed by Ihe High Court ofMadiya pradesh similar ordw m tihis case also. Counsel for fhe respondente the counsel for the petitioners made at the Bar, Having thus comidered and for the petitioners at the Bar, it is diijected Ifaat petitioners shall be decided within a | receipt/production oftfais order. tfth^ be paid mterest at the rate of 6% w^uch three years only. With llie aforesaid direction^, without aiiy order as to cosfcs. Certifiedcopy as per mles. • <=hi^id4lvi ^rm^Tf ^ f^t 'rf^^R '^^^f^^n^T to|mtted that petiti<mers retiral dues are not ^cale which was applicable to them. He ^.P.(8) No. 2072/^)04, orders have been on 13-4-2004. Couaisel prays for sijibmitted that relying on the statCTnent of similar orders may be passed. t^lying on tiie statement made by coumel the representatioii filed by the jperiod ofthree months jfrom the date of petitioners are teld entitled, they shall would b©restricted for a period of t, the writ petition stands disposed of Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^'fil^ [•qt^^-r^