IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 20631 of 2011 Date of decision : 07.11.2011 Ex. L/NK Subhash Chander ....Petitioner Versus Union of India and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present: Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advocate for the petitioner Mrs. Anjali Kukkar, Standing Counsel for Union of India – respondent No. 1 MAHESH GROVER, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has not been paid payment on account of service rendered by him whereas respondents in the reply while deciding the legal issue raised by the petitioner have disputed this and have stated that they have already made the payment to the petitioner. That being the situation when the petitioner raises a disputed question of fact regarding payment of dues which fact has been controverted by the respondents, there is no merit in the petition, therefore the same is dismissed, However, the petitioner is at liberty to get determined his estimates and necessary details of the payment paid to him by the respondents as a measure of satisfaction of his grievance. It is expected that respondent would respond favourably to the request of the petitioner to supply the details. The petitioner is also at liberty to avail any other legal remedy available to him under law. (MAHESH GROVER) 07.11.2011 JUDGE reena