IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 524 OF 2010 MISS MARIA FERNANDES & 8 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus SHRI ANTONIO RODRIGUES (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS ... Respondent Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the petitioners. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 24th August, 2010 P.C. Heard Mr. Rivonkar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners. By this petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 16th December,2009 passed by the Civil Judge, J.D., C Court, Margao dismissing the application filed by the petitioners, who are the plaintiffs in Regular Civil Suit No.274/2001/C for sending the written statement filed in the suit and agreement Exh.28C to the Handwriting Expert at Hyderabad for his report. 2. Having heard Mr. Rivonkar, learned Counsel for the petitioners and having perused the papers, I am of the considered opinion that no case for exercise of extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court is made out. The learned Judge in the impugned order has permitted the plaintiffs to seek assistance of a Private Handwriting Expert by securing his presence in the Court for the purpose of giving his report in respect of the signatures on the said documents. It is, therefore, evident that the petitioners have an effective remedy to get their grievance redressed. 3. In this factual background, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order by exercising extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 or 227 of Constitution of India. No case is made out for interference. Hence, the petition is dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA