IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2010 / 1TH JYAISTHA 1932 RP.No. 107 of 2007(N) --------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER: --------------------------------- ASHRAF A.M., P.A. TO SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, R.D.B., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.L.MOHANAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CONVENOR, DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE (HIGHER), PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,P.W.D.DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. CHIEF ENGINEER (ROADS & BRIDGES) AND ADMINISTRATION, PUBLIC OFFICE COMPOUND, MUSEUM JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. NANDAKUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- R.P.No.107/2007 in O.P.No.24491/2001. -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the Ist day of June, 2010 O R D E R A reading of the judgment shows that the same was passed on the assumption that the petitioner has retired from service. From the review petition it is seen that the assumption was incorrect and the petitioner is still continuing in service. In view of the above, I am satisfied that apparently there is an error in the judgment. In view of this the review is allowed and the judgment is recalled. Post the Original Petition for hearing. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 : ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- R.P.No.107/2007 in O.P.No.24491/2001. -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the Ist day of June, 2010 O R D E R