^g) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT B!LASPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI H.L. DATTU, CJ. Petitioner Writ Petition No. 590 of 2002 Smt. Jeet Bai, W/o Indarsan Lal, aged 32 years, Occupation - Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Kevat-Navagaon, R/o Kevat-Navagaon, Tahsii Dondi Lohara, District Durg. Respondents Versus 1. State of Chhattlsgarh, through: Secretary, Department of Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur. 2. Commissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur 3. Additional Collector, Durg. 4. Sub Divisiona! Officer, Dondi Lohara, District Durg. 5. Chief Executive iOfflcer, Janpad Panchayat, Dondi Lohara. 6. Bhuvaneshwar Das Baghel, S/o Dhurva Das, aged about 30 lyears, R/o viilage- Kevat-Navagaon, Tahsil Dondi Lohara, District Durg. Present: Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 16tn SVSarch, 2007) After arguing the matter for quite some time, fearned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the relief sought for in this writ petition would not survive for consideration of this Court. (2) Taking note of the statement made by iearned counsei for th.e petltloner, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. However, liberty is resen/ed to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authorities for redressal of all other grievance^ if any. Orderedaccordingty. | Sd/- Chief Justice