- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.470 OF 2006 Shri.Himanshu Chandrakant Chitnis ..Petitioner Vs. Smt.Mrunalini Himanshu Chitnis and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.C.R.Dalvi Senior Advocate for Petitioner Mrs.A.S.Pai A.P.P. for State ... CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : MARCH 27, 2006 DATE : MARCH 27, 2006 DATE : MARCH 27, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned advcoate for the petitioner and Respondent No.1 who is present in person. 2. The petitioner is husband. We have issued notice to the Respondent No.1. She is present in person before the Court today. She states that she is staying at Pune and she is an Architect. The child is in her custody and properly being looked after by her. She states that she keeps the child in "Deck-care-centre" throughout the day and takes away in the evening. The petitioner wants to see the child. Therefore, upon our pursuation, Respondent No.1 agreed that even though she had given legal notice to the husband for divorce and - 2 - though the disputes are pending between her and the petitioner, she will have no objection if the petitioner-husband comes to her house to see the child. Therefore, we dispose of this petition granting liberty to the petitioner to visit the house of the Respondent No.1 to see his child on every Thursday between 7.15 p.m. to 9.15 p.m. on the address furnished by the Respondent No.1, which is as under: "D-4, Gajanan B.Society, Lane No.14, Paramhans Nagar, Pound Road, Pune." 3. Needless to say that neither the Petitioner nor the Respondent No.1 will create any further complications and problems during this meeting. This arrangement is made without prejudice to the rights of the Petitioner and Respondent No.1. 4. Petition is disposed of accordingly. [D.G.DESHPANDE, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]