IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 31429 of 1997 Between: A.Suresh S/o.Anthoney, aged 45 years, Occ: Head Constable General Dairy, NISA, Hyderabad, Hakkimpet. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Commandant/Principal, Central Industrial Security Force(Ministry of Home Affairs) RTC Arakkonam, P.O.Takkolam, NAA District, Tamil Nadu. 2. The Director General, Central Industrial Security Force(Ministry of Home Affairs) Block No.13, C.G.O Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-3. 3. Inspector General/Head Quarters, O/o.Director General, Central Industrial Security Force, 13, C.G.O.Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110 003. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.1 in issuing the order No.15014/CISF/RTC(A)/MAJ/95/4531, dated 12-9-1995 which was confirmed by the 2nd respondent vide order No.V- 11014/12/Trg/95/419, dated 1-2-1996 and the final order by the 3rd respondent vide No.V-11014/18/97-L & R/1436, dated 23-5-1995, as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and against the principles of Natural Justice and issue consequential direction the respondents to promote the petitioner from the post of Head Constable General Diary and fix the scale of pay along with the arrears and do such and further order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitoner: Mr.Tirumala Rao Mamidala.(Not present) Counsel for the Respondents: G.Vijay Kumar, Standing Counsel for CISF. The Court made the following : O R D E R: None appeared for the petitioner on 28-1-2005. Therefore, the matter was adjourned to 1-2-2005. Today also none appears for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the respondents has submitted a xerox copy of the letter addressed by the petitioner to his counsel marking a copy to the respondents. As per the said letter the petitioner does not wish to press the writ petition. A copy of the letter to that effect is placed on record. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ 1st February, 2005 mrb To 1. The Commandant/Principal, Central Industrial Security Force(Ministry of Home Affairs) RTC Arakkonam, P.O.Takkolam, NAA District, Tamil Nadu. 2. The Director General, Central Industrial Security Force(Ministry of Home Affairs) Block No.13, C.G.O Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-3. 3. Inspector General/Head Quarters, O/o.Director General, Central Industrial Security Force, 13, C.G.O.Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110 003.