-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.104 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.104 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.104 OF 2006 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.S.S.Shah for the Appellant CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: APRIL 19, 2006. APRIL 19, 2006. APRIL 19, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Shah for the Appellant. The Appellant is the original Plaintiff. A suit was filed by the Appellant for removal of encroachment. The suit was dismissed by the Trial Court and the decree of the Trial Court was confirmed by the Appellate Court. The Courts below have found that the Appellant failed to prove the fact that there was an encroachment made by the Respondents. 2. After having heard Shri Shah for the Appellant, I find that no substantial question of law arises. The findings of the courts below are based on oral and documentary evidence on record. There is no merit in the Second Appeal and the same is dismissed with no order as to costs. -2- Judge. Judge. Judge.