: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.40 OF 2009 ... Petitioner V/s. ... Respondent Mr.for Petitioner Mr.for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: JANUARY 8, 2010 P.C.: 1. The contempt petition has been filed contending that there was a breach of the order dated 14.7.2008. By this order, a statement was made on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 to 4 that they woold look into the matter and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks from the date of the order. Since that had not been done, the present contempt petition has been filed. 2. Thereafter, the parties have resolved the main dispute. Consent terms have been arrived at by the petitioners and Respondent No.5, their employer. These consent terms have been identified by the learned Assistant Government Pleader and have also been signed by the respective advocates. : 2 : 3. In view of these consent terms, which are taken on record and marked `X’ for identification, the present contempt petition is not pressed and is dismissed accordingly.