ps= HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W,P^S2271 No. 6111/2011 PETITIONBR DEFENDANT VERSUS RESPONDENT PLAINTIPF Dhansi Ram, S/o Pyare Lal Agrawal, aged about 65 years (PresenUy aged about 81 years), R/o Laxiaipur, Ra^arh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). Maage Rani Agrawal, S/o Kanhaiya Lal Agrawal, aged about 70 years (presently aged about 80 years) R/o Shankar Mffls Store, Subhash Chowk, Ra^arh (C.G.). WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OP THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Hon'Me Mr. T.P.Shaa?ma, J.j Present:- Shri Ravindra Agrawal, Advocate for the petitioner. Respondent not noticed. ORDER 2. 3. a««o'(nn 14,'1 ft/O.ni 11 ^i-dCT^»;i* \sa *-<TJ *v?/ A^-fAA^ By fhis petition under Article 227 of fhe Constitution of India petitioner has chaUenged the legaUty and propriety of the order dated 3/9/2011 passed by 2nd Civil Judge Class-II, Raiearh ia civil suit No. 05-A/2010 whereby Court below has disniissed tlie petition for exainiaation ofwitnesses on coiuiaission. Shri Ravindra Agrawal, Advocate for the petitioner is heard. Leamed counsel for the petitioner frankly adiaits that civil suit is pending siuce 1995 aad trial Court has given last chance for evidence ofdefendaats on 17/ 10/2011. Considering the aforesaid facts and in absence of aay conipeUuig circunistaiices for issuance of coinmission for recording evidence, petition is disiaissed suminarily. No order as to costs. Interim appUcation staads disposed of. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge