IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 1ST JANUARY 2009 / 11TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 36475 of 2008(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.PRABHAKARAN, AGED 45, S/O.PRABHAKARAN NAIR, MANAKKANCHARATH HOUSE KILLIMANGALAM, CHELAKKARA, TRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNA MENON SRI.M.JITHESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TRISSUR. 2. M.P.BABU, MEKKATT HOUSE, ELANAD.PO., TRISSUR. SMT.SUDHADEVI, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.36475 of 2008 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 1st day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner's grievance is regarding the revision of timings concerning the stage carriage operated by the 2nd respondent. In this writ petition what he is seeking is a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P4 also before settling the timings. 2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that timings have been settled as early as on 28/11/2008. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner points out that proceedings have not been issued so far. 3. Now that the timings have been settled, remedy available to the petitioner is to approach the statutory forum. If as stated by the petitioner, the 1st respondent has not issued proceedings of timing conference held on 28/11/2008, the 1st respondent shall issue the proceedings on an expeditious basis. The petitioner will produce a copy of the judgment before the 1st respondent, who shall issue the proceedings of the timing conference, with copy to the petitioner also. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg