IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19518 of 2010 RAKESH MAHTO SON OF BISHUN MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----- 3. 17.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under section 366a/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the victim in her statement recorded u/s.164 Cr.P.C. did not allege any sexual assault upon herself and has stated that she had married the present petitioner out of her own sweet will, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in Amnour P.S.case No.12 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner and (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on the date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )