1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.4270 OF 2005 NO.4270 OF 2005 NO.4270 OF 2005 Ms Bernadette Marie Braganza .. Petitioner versus Mr.Orlando Julian Braganza ... Respondent Ms.Seema Sarnaik, Advocate for Petitioner Mr.R.K.Shouche, Advocate i/b Mr.S.V.Pitre for Respondent CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : J.N.PATEL,J J.N.PATEL,J J.N.PATEL,J DATED DATED DATED : : : 25th July, 2006 25th July, 2006 25th July, 2006 ORAL ORAL ORAL ORDER : ORDER : ORDER : 1. In view of the fact that a substantive petition has been dismissed for want of prosecution and even an application for its restoration is rejected by an order dated 9th December, 2005. Nothing survives in the petition which is preferred impugning the order which was mainly challenged on 2 the part of quantum. 2. Counsel for the respondent-husband submits that in terms of the interim order the respondent-husband has paid the maintenance as directed by the Family Court, Pune. 3. In view of this fact situation, nothing survives in the petition. Petition is dismissed as infructuous. (J.N.Patel, (J.N.Patel, (J.N.Patel, J) J) J)