IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FA No.506 of 1979 1. Gopal Krishna Jha, 2. Ramesh Kant Jha, 3. Ramendra Jha @ Ramendra Kumar Jha, 4. Mahendra Jha @ Mahendra Kumar Jha, All sons of Tara Kant Jha, residents of village Banu Chapra Tapa Khadda Pergana Majhowa P. S. Bettiah, P. O. Banuchapra District West Champaran, …. Defendants 1st party--- Appellants. Versus 1. Ajay Kumar 2. Binod Kumar 3. Sanjay Kumar All sons of Damodar Jha, resident of village Banu Chapra P. S. Bettiah, P. O. Banuchapra District West Champaran. … Plaintiffs--- Respondents. 4. Nirsu Jha son of Pt. Sri Lalji Jha deceased of village Banuchapra P. S. Bettiah District West Champaran. ….Defendant 2nd part… Respondent. 5. Bikram Thakur son of Keshwar Thakur of village Hardia P. S. Ramnagar, District Champaran. 6. S. K. G. Sugar Mill Lauria, through Manager S. K. G. Sugar Mill Lauria District Chamapran. 7. Sukhi Bhagat son of Dhuman Bhagat of Baritola P. S. Bettiah P. O. Banuchapar District West Champaran. 8. Bhola Raut son of Harihar Raut of village Jagjiwan Nagar Baswaria P. O. and P. S. Bettiah District West Champaran. 9. Chaturi Mahto son of Sri Ramlal Mahto of village Hardiya P. S. Ramnagar District West Champaran. 10. Most. Singari w/o Dhyani Mahto, 11. Sohan Mahto son of Deonandan Mahto 12. Kishun Raut son of Khelawan Raut, Residents of village Hardiya P. O. JOgia P. S. Ramnagar District West Champaran. 13. Sri Om Prakash son of Anjani Saw Mill Chhawani Road, Bettiah District West Champaran. 14. Chunni Sah son of Raghubir Sah of village Banuchapra P. O. and P. S. Bettiah District West Champaran. 15. Md. Israil s/o Habib of village and P.O. Jogia P. S. Ramnagar Distgrict West Champaran …. Defendants 3rd Party.. Respondents. ----------- 2 21. 14.02.2011 Heard Dr. Mayanand Jha, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Shiv Kumar Dwivedy, learned counsel appearing for contesting respondents no. 1 to 3. A joint compromise petition has been filed praying therein for disposal of this appeal in terms of compromise arrived between the parties as explained in paragraph 4 of the said petition read with its schedule. That being so, this appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise petition which shall now form part of the compromise decree in place of the decree under appeal. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. Kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)