IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23208 of 2010 BINOD RAI @ BINOD KUMAR RAI @ BINOD KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 15.9.2010 Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been acquitted in the following cases: 1. Vaishali (Belsar) P.S. Case No. 117 of 1999 for offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Vaishali (Belsar) P.S. Case No. 141 of 2003 for offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Vaishali (Belsar) P.S. Case No. 123 of 2004 for offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. 4. Vaishali (Belsar) P.S. Case No. 83 of 2005 for offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. 5. Vaishali (Belsar) P.S. Case No. 185 of 2005 for offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. 6. Goraul P.S. Case No. 178 of 2003 for offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. 7. Goraul P.S. Case No. 153 of 2001 for offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Earlier this Court had granted bail to the petitioner subject to the condition that he has a clean antecedent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that four witnesses have already been examined in this case including the 2 informant. In the circumstances, the Court where Kurhani (Fakuli) P.S. Case No. 274 of 2005 giving rise to G.R. No. 1777 of 2005 is pending should be concluded expeditiously preferably within a period of three months. Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to deposit the cost of FAX for communicating this order to the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)