IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 10418 of 2005 Between: A. Appala Ramaiah S/o Anapana Kotabommali, Srikakulam District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of A.P., rep by Secrtary, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development A.P., Secrtariat, Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development, Hyderabad 3 The District Collector, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District 4 The District Panchayat Officer, Srikakulam, Srikakulam Distrct .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the in action of the respondents in considering the representation dt 23-4-2005 made by the petitioner as illegal and contrary to the provisions of the A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and consequently direct the respondents, more particularly the 1st respondent to take appropriate steps upon the said representation and pass such other or further orders as this HOn'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.ROY REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 10418 of 2005 O R D E R: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and therefore, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 28-11-2008 KLP