IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 13315 of 2008. Decided on 23.02.2011. _____________________________________________________ Amar Singh. …Petitioners. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Respondent No. 3, already exparte. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Vikas Rajput, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Consequently, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending applications, if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge February 23, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.