IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 907 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 01/07/2009 in WP NO : 12822 OF 2009 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 Smt P.Nagamma W/o.Virupaksha Reddy Chippagari(M) Kurnool District 2 Smt.N.Padhamma W/o. Late N.Nityananda Reddy Ramadurgam,Kurnool District Nemkal,Chippagiri(M) Kurnool District ..... APPELLANT(S) AND 1 Smt Konaki Jayalakshmi W/oMohan Chippagiri Mandal Parishad Chippagiri Mandal, Kurnool district. 2 The State of A.P. Rep. by its Principal Secretary Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3 The District Collector Kurnool Kurnool District. 4 The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad Kurnool District. 5 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Adoni Division, Kurnool District. 6 Sri Dasari Sunkanna, w/o. Tipanna, Gajipuram Village, Gummanuru MPTC, Chippagiri Mandal, Kurnool district. 7 Sri Sita Raamudu S/o. Not known to the petitioner Nemakal-I Kurnool District. 8 Sri Chinna Laxmaiah S/o. Not known to the petitioner Neemakal-II, Kurnool District. 9 Smt. Achamma W/o. Not known to the petitioner Beldona, Kurnool District. 10 . .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.P.VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO:907 OF 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari). This writ appeal is filed against the order of the learned single Judge passed in W.P.M.P.No:16606 of 2009 in W.P.No:12822 of 2009 on 1.7.2009. Before going into the merits of the merits case, it is to be noted that the respondent has approached this Court against the interim order passed in the above W.P.M.P without exhausting the remedy that is available in accordance with law. Therefore, we feel that the approach of the appellant appears to be a premature one and as such, this appeal is liable to be dismissed at its thrashold. Accordingly, this writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. However, the appellant is at liberty to move an appropriate application in accordance with law. ___________________________ Justice T. MEENA KUMARI _______________________ Justice SANJAY KUMAR Dated 9th July, 2009. Dvs/Gurc HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.A. No.901 OF 2009 (Judgment of the Division Bench delivered by Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) Dated 9th July, 2009.