SinfllsBencli U^ l ^i a-^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P^tO, ^-4-55' 72006 ?. PETITIONER . .^^0 p. ^O.--"; ,c.W.-'-!j" £sed^¥^-"""" ASW&- ..» <^ A. -v\\,\.w-- RESPONDENTS Anup Kumar Singh Thakur, S/o.. Late Shri ,8.8. Thakur, aged about 50, R/o. ~G-2, Irrigation Colony, Chakradhar Nagar, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, / Through Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Engineer in Chief, ' Water Resources Department, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Sub Divisional OfHcer,. Water Resources Department, Sub Division, Raigarh, District Raigarh 4. Secretary, Panchayat and Gramin Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 5. Joint Secretaiy, Panchayat and Gramin Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) [•ITION UNDBR ARTICLB 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER d (, ^y XI-HC-78 3^''^Fn^PT, ®Tn+1'IS,Islclltiy HltRTTSh^lcb ^...^.t^..^:.^5?.^^ 200^ OT^r'ra^i'(I^3g^8T) 3fi^T?n'f^iR; OTT STR^T giiiR; 5WW (rf?cT •SI^T 28-8-2006 Mr. Sunil Otwani, counsel fo]r Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. advance copy. Heard. The petitioner's case is th^t Water Resourees Department anc< 1) he was sent on deputation t{ Development. In compliance of| Department of Panchayat & Rura| of the Water Rssources Departmeht S-2006 and the same has been] petitioner made a representation Deveiopment stating therein that Department of Panchayat & Rural being decided. Having heard leamed coun^ei petition, the petitioner has already] Rural Deveiopment in pursuani] thereafter, that order has been petitions. That order was quashep AdvocateGeneral on behalf of ti1e scheme for sending the Engineei] the Pradhan Mantri Gram SadakY< Therefore, in the circumstai the Department of Panchayat & passing the order regarding PMGpY iWfefFT WRciY iC'fWt ^RZTC ^a^irsn^r the pet'rtioner. Advocate for the State/respondents, on it he was working as Sub Enginesr in the vide order dated 12-6-2006 (Annexure P- > the Department of Panchayat & Rural that order, the petitioner joined in the Development. Later on, other Engineers had chalienged the said order dated 12- quashed by this Court. Thereafter, the |o the Department of Panchayat & Rural he does not want to continue in the IDevelopment, but his representation is not n^ei for the parties and having perused the joined in the Department of Panchayat & te of the order dated 12-6-2006 and q|uashed qua the petitioners who filed the on the submission made by the Deputy tKe State that the State has framed a new (s of Water Resources Department under ^jana (PMGSY) scheme. (ces, as the petitioner has already joined in Ftural Development, the respondents while scheme in respect of the Engineers of P.T.O. •OTd ^ ^0'7 •jspjo siq} p Adoo p^ •}o pesodsip spueis uoiiiisd su} 'f ssLj si| sjeq/A {sod sij} uo ;usiudo|eA3a eyi ui snu|tuo3||B4s jsuoiiiied sq} 'usy} j| io }osdsej ui sje9Ui6u3 jsyio sq} qtim Bui Asqt 'ejo^sjeqi '}U8iu}jBdea ssojnosey jq 'jsuoiiged eq} y> eseo eqi japisuoo OS|B l^iiphiy^t^ >l?;>fcJ> pi&J ^ \Kihlh l-\^^h P! U!}J83 JOJ pejBUS 9JB SSiyBcj )jessjojB suoipsjip eqi qijAA •peuiofApesj|e [|3jny -g teAeqouec! io iusLUvedSQ lll •jeuogitsd eyi ys seoiAjes sq} |?|e jspjo eieydojdde ssed p]noqs ^EAA 0} sBuo|eq jsuoBffed sq} se p|r|oqs tusiuijedsa ssojnossy JSIBAA ~s i^U££2)ai&i£Aa -A euuos ifelhtB liiiiltp IbC ifcl^ llb lj^)h> (^'iaisPjiA) tbish i^i»e i^i/.^., .^.../. .. ^,....^. . 43lht(5 IMhlh '^'-^'•^"(^"~u± •>fiftll-»b]'°>lf»[)lS'jil^UeUf^E 8Z.-3H-IX