1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi COMPANY PETITION NO. 138 OF 1993. M/s. Jayalakshmi Leasing Company. ..Petitioner. v/s. Indodan Industries Limited. ..Respondent. .... Mr. Rajiv Singh, i/b. Cr. Bayley & Co., for Petitioner. Ms. Neeta V. Parikh, for Respondent. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 7TH OCTOBER 2010. P.C. In view of the scheme sanctioned by the BIFR, the learned Advocate appearing for the Respondent Company undertakes to make payments to the Petitioner as directed under the said scheme. The Respondent Company shall forward the cheques to the Petitioner at the Petitioner’s address available with the Company. In the event of change in address, the Petitioners shall intimate the same to the Respondent Company. 2. In view of the above, the Petitioner’s seek liberty to withdraw the Petition. The Company Petition is accordingly, disposed of as withdrawn. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]