CRM-M No. 360 of 2011 Sandeep Gupta vs. State of Punjab Present: Mr. G.S.Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner. *** This is an application for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 158 dated 28.04.2010, under Sections 406/498-A IPC, registered at Police Station Kotwali, Patiala. The earlier bail application bearing CRM-M No. 17861 of 2010 filed by the present petitioner was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 29.11.2010. In the application bearing CRM-M No. 25591 of 2010 moved by his parents the concession of anticipatory bail was granted vide order of the even date in the following terms:- “Without commenting upon merit of the case and keeping in view the fact that recovery of the remaining articles can be effected from the husband, I deem it appropriate to accept the prayer of the petitioners for grant of pre-arrest bail.” Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that in fact it was decided in Court that the petitioner and his parents would have to pay a total sum of ` 6 lacs and that amount was paid, If indeed that had been so then the Hon'ble Judge would have definitely taken cognizance of the same. Apart from that there is no change in circumstance which has been brought out by learned counsel. Consequently finding no merit, this petition is dismissed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE January 13, 2011 sunita