C‘éWaoL/V @ G) IN WEE LECQ aw” a}? {:JEJAWgGA‘JaEa As“ 3w? B wu- w DETETInp MO 3 6 8mm: V'UJ avgw‘rmn; wng /1 Q 1V r PaLEQI gkv QLV guiAAiU ‘uiko i. ouni; Rama? - L6 oiu wiri oiijam Sunder Patel aged about 44 years, Assi$tant I Teaicger posted at G-Gveii’iment Heighei‘ Ggecoaua‘ry A School Nandeli Dist Raigarh (C.G¢) Arvind. Kumgr Petel S/o Shri EemCharec-a Paie‘; ageu A ewe“ L‘ 4. ~T A4 years, Assistaht Teacher posted at Government §E Heigher Secondary Sehoo‘; Nari-deg, Digif Raigar‘ri {{3. ‘} K yaaaae I y ciiuauiagara 14L. A4. 1 1.1mrough Secretary, Educatyion Department, D.K.S.Bhawanz Raipur (C.G.). Th6 gig-u 1L; EdaC’ci‘uiGL’i viiiiict , Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.). The Principal of Government Higher Secondary Schec—‘i Nandei‘i, Tahsi‘i é; Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) gar—3g? eargrre-r ragga gag—era aa 42$? a? THE COUNSTITUTEON or mam FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT m KATURE or CEERTIOEARL MAEDAMUsa momm'mom Arie eraaa eegraara wage ea algae; egggeagea ea mREeTioNs, ORBER OR GREERES: m1 +a§n+ 1.: . mt: 5., / HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. No. 968 of 2005 5unil Kumar Pa'fe! & ano‘fher PefH’ioners Versus ‘Sfa're of Chha‘Hisgarh & ofhers ‘ Responden‘rs Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Jus-fice Swish K. Agnihofri. Shri R.S. Pa'l'el, Advocafe for The Petifioners. 5hri V.V.S. Moor'rhy, Dy. Advoca‘re General wi'rh Sm‘r. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt Advocm‘e for- fhe responden'rs/Sm‘te. ORDER (9“1 amber, 2006) . Learned counsel appearing for 'H'Ie pefifioners submi‘rs ‘rha'r while working as Assisian'r Teacher's/Upper Division Teachers, 'I'he pe'ii‘i'ionens have gone on Training 1’0 improve 'l’heir quaiifica'fions on Their own expenses and acquired B.Ed./B.T.I Examinafion Cer'l'ificafe. o According f0 learned counsel for The pel'i‘l'ioners, ‘l'he peli‘rioners are en‘fi‘l'led 1'o lwo advance incremenfs in view of ’l’he decision of fhis Cour'l' in The case of Yoshwam‘ Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corpora'rion, Durg and anofher {2006 (II) MPJR—CG 96}. This Cour‘l' in ‘l’he case of Yadnwan'r Kumar Bharadwaj Vso Municipal Corporai'ion, Durg and anofher (Supra), came 1'0 'l'he conclusion ‘l‘ha‘l’ fhe feachers, who had ob‘l'ained B. Ed./B.T.I. Examina'iion Cerfificafe on his own expenses, are cavered by The circuiar dafed 24.12.98 issued by fhe Sfa‘re Governmenf of Madhya Pradesh. . Learned counsel for The pefi‘l'ioners fur'rher submi'l's +ha'r The fac-rs and ques‘rion of law involved in fhe presen‘r cases are squareiy covered by decision of fhis Cour? in 'fhe case of Vashwan'i Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporafion, Dung and ano‘rher (Supra), 1'0 which learned counsel appearing for 'rhe responden'l's fairly concedes and agrees wi‘l’h The avermen'l made by learned counsel appearing for The pefi'rioners. 4. Accordingly, The wriT peTiTion is allowed in Terms of The order passed in The case of Yashwanf Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corpora‘lion, Durg and anofher (Supra), subject 1’0 verificafion of +he fact as fa whe-l'her The pelifioners have acquired B. Ed./B.T.I. Examina'lion Cer‘l’ifica'l'es on fheir own expenses or no1'. No order .e" i as 'ro costs. Sdl- »Saash 1x Agnihotrij Judge Subhash