IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30513 of 2009 PAWAN YADAV @ PAWAN KUMAR YADAV . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02/ 05/03/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the informant who has appeared suo motu. The defence on behalf of the petitioner under Sections- 302, 147, 148, 149, 307 and 323 of Indian Penal Code is of false implication to urge that he is not one of the seven named accused when the F.I.R. does not even state that they were accompanied by any one. the named accused have been enlarged on bail in Cr.Misc. No.29334/09. If the submission on behalf of the informant be correct and the trial is on the verge of conclusion, let it be expedited when any misuse of the privilege of bail by the petitioner may be dealt with appropriately by the court below so that the trial be concluded expeditiously, as was urged presently. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Sakatpur P.S. Case No.23/09. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)