IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13483 of 2011 Anant Prasad Jha S/O Late Manoranjan Jha R/O Vill.-Reri, P.S.-Godda (Mufassil), Distt.-Godda, Jharkhand--Pettiioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director General of Police-Cum-The Inspector General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, (Administration), Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Assistant to the Inspector General of Police (Personnel), Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga. 6. The Inspector General of Police, Bhagalpur. 7. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Purnea Range, Purnea. 8. The Superintendent of Police, Katihar. 9. The Treasury Officer, Katihar. 10. The Accountant General, Bihar, Bir Chand Patel Path, Patna---------------------------------Respondents ---------------------------------- 2 13.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is a retired police inspector who superannuated from Katihar District Police. He wants a direction upon the respondents to consider his claim for grant of second time bound promotion as well as the ACP. After some argument counsel for the petitioner is not willing to press for any relief with regard to time bound promotion. However according to him he is entitled to benefit of pay revision in terms of the modified ACP scheme which has been brought into effect by the State Government as recent as in the year 2009. Since such claims have to be worked out on the basis of the service record of the petitioner on due verification, let the petitioner move the Superintendent of Police of the district concerned from where he retired by filing a detailed claim with regard to grievance on this score with a copy of this order and the concerned 2 authority will decide the claim preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of such application. If the entitlement of the petitioner is found to be inconsonance with the claim then follow up action will be taken by grant thereof or else petitioner would be told about the reason for refusal, if any, within the said time frame. This writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)