IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-25322 of 2009 Date of Decision : November 17, 2009 Maha Singh ... Petitioner versus State of Haryana ... Respondent Present: Mr. R.S.Cheema, Senior Advocate with Mr. R.K. Trikha, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sidharath Sarup, AAG Haryana with Mr. RS Budhwar, Advocate for the complainant L. N. Mittal, J. Maha Singh has filed this petition for bail in case FIR No. 404 dated 30.9.2008 under sections 323, 324, 325, 302 read with section 34 IPC, Police Station Assandh, District Karnal. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. According to prosecution version, the petitioner inflicted lathi blows on chest and leg of the deceased. Co-accused Satpal inflicted sword blow on the right leg of the deceased whereas another co-accused Dharampal inflicted gandasi blow on the head of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that petitioner's co-accused Satpal has already been granted bail by this Court vide order Annexure P/12 and the petitioner is almost on parity with him. The contention cannot be accepted because sword blow had been attributed to Criminal Misc. No. M-25322 of 2009 -2- Satpal but no corresponding injury was found on the body of the deceased as there was no incised wound on the leg of the deceased. On the other hand, lathi blows are attributed to the petitioner on chest and leg of the deceased and corresponding injuries have been found on his body. Not only that, there were multiple fractures of leg bones. Keeping in view the role attributed to the petitioner, he cannot claim parity with Satpal in the aforesaid circumstances. In view of the aforesaid but without commenting anything on merits, the petitioner does not deserve the concession of bail. Dismissed. ( L. N. Mittal ) November 17, 2009 Judge 'dalbir'