C.W.P. No. 894 of 2009 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 894 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 03.08.2011 Jagdish Singh ..........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Attariwala, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Sandeep Khunger, Advocate for respondent No.3. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. On the last date of hearing, the case was adjourned on the request of learned State counsel to comply with order dated 15.3.2011, wherein, a direction was issued by the Court that the State Government and the Corporation authorities shall hold a joint meeting to resolve the case of the petitioner regarding pensionary benefits. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 has brought to the notice of the Court that In compliance of the order passed by this court on 31.5.2011, a joint meeting has been held and it has been resolved that the respective share of the amount was to be paid by the authorities concerned and an amount of ` 93,180.00 is to be paid by the Punjab Roadways whereas an amount of ` 2,00,369.00 is to be paid by Municipal C.W.P. No. 894 of 2009 (2) Corporation, Amritsar. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 further submits that the amount of the Corporation would be paid within four weeks from today. Learned counsel for the State also submits that the amount as determined in the meeting as per share of the State government would be paid preferably within a period of four weeks. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State as well as respondent No.3, the present petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as such. However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner is aggrieved in any manner, he is at liberty to challenge the action of the respondents. It is also made clear that after making payment of the said amount, respondent No.3 is also directed to grant the consequential benefits. August 03, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE Note:-Whether this case is to be referred to the Reporter .......Yes/No