WP(C) 5282/2008 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. Mahmud, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr Mishra, learned St anding Counsel, Education Department. The petitioner is before this Court being aggrieved by the order dated 1 7/11/2008 passed by the Deputy Inspector of Schools, North Lakhimpur, Lakhimpur, placing him under suspension pending drawal of a departmental proceeding. The r easons in support of the order have also been set out therein. Being aggrieved, the petitioner in the meantime has submitted a representation before the aforem entioned authority stating the relevant facts with a request for withdrawal of t he impugned order. Though the representation has been submitted on 6/12/2008, ac cording to the petitioner, no action thereon has yet been taken. A representatio n by the President of the school Managing Committee on the issue has also been s ubmitted before the same authority, which the petitioner asserts, has also been left unattended. Mr. Mahmud while assailing the impugned order of suspension has submitte d that without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, at this s tage, this petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to co nsider and dispose of his representation on merits. Mr. Mishra has no objection to the mode of disposal suggested. Upon hearing the learned Counsel for the parties and on a consideration of the materials on record, this petition stands closed with a direction to the Deputy Inspector of Schools, North Lakhimpur, Lakhimpur, to consider and dispos e of the petitioner’s representation on merits. As the petitioner is under susp ension, the exercise indicated hereinabove should be completed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petition stands closed in the above terms. No costs.