1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.992 OF 2011 Santosh Nanku Dube alias .Applicants Pappu Dube & anr. V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.H.E.Palwe, Advocate, for the Applicants Smt.S.V.Sonawane, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 7TH DECEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for anticipatory bail by two persons, who were traveling in a car which was to carry fire arms as per the information which police had already received. Police had prepared for a trap pursuant to the information received. When the police party apprehended the car, three persons including the 2 two applicants ran away. A pistol was found but not a revolver. The learned counsel for the applicants states that the entire apprehension about applicants' involvement is based on confessional statement of a person arrested while in police custody which is not admissible and therefore, states that the applicants be admitted to anticipatory bail. It is not the case that the police accidently stumbled upon the car in which the fire arms were being carried but they had already information and had started after forming necessary raiding party and dividing the raiding party in two groups. In view of this, since the revolver is yet to be seized, Anticipatory Bail Application stands rejected. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)