IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.21505 of 2010 MD.AKBAR @ MD. RAJA @ MD.NAKCHIPPA @ NAKCHIPPA Son of Md. Yunus Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 06.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 457/380 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant states that he learnt about the theft in the house of his father-in-law, who was undergoing treatment at Hyderabad since last four months. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Vishwanath Bhagat stated that this petitioner, who is his neighbour, may have committed the crime. He further submits that the T.V. set alleged to have been recovered from the village Ghosikundi does not belong to him. He further submits that petitioner does not have any house in Ghosikundi. Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. After hearing the counsel for the parties, this Court observes that if the petitioner does not have any house in village Ghosikundi, he would be released on bail by the learned Magistrate on verification of the aforesaid fact, on his own satisfaction. With the aforesaid direction, this application is 2 disposed of. Let this order be sent to the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. case no. 417 of 2009 through Fax at the cost of the petitioner. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)