1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.134 OF 2008 Akila Vimanwala. ...Petitioner. Vs. Fakhruddin Vimanwala & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mrs.Nutan S. Moily for the Petitioner. Mr. Niranjan Vaghela i/b. Pandya & Co. for the Respondents. ..... CORAM :DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. March 18, 2008. P.C.: At the hearing of the Arbitration Petition, a compilation of documents has been tendered by the Petitioner which inter alia contains a Deed of Partnership dated 3rd April 2007. The Petition has been instituted on the basis that the prevailing Deed of Partnership was dated 11th December 2006. From the documents which have been placed on the record in the compilation, it appears that there is a subsequent Deed of Partnership dated 3rd April 2007. The partner mentioned at Sr.No. 3 of Exhibit ' A' to the Petition has retired and two 2 additional partners have been inducted. The Petitioner is a signatory, prima facie, to the Deed of Partnership. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner does not, upon instructions, dispute the fact that the signature on the Deed of Partnership dated 3rd April 2007, is the signature of the Petitioner. In this view of the matter, the appropriate course would be, to dispose of the petition leaving it open to the Petitioner to adopt proceedings afresh incorporating all relevant documents and impleading necessary parties. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. ....