^'^ H!GHCQTmTOFaFiHATTlSGARHATB!LASPTM Wxtt Petition No. 4§87of2005 Sahu £E1!132Q^SB : Salikram Rathi.3^ aged about 21 years, S/o Dokaramm Rathiya., Secretar>//Fancm<iiyat Karmi, Gram Fanchayat Shokhamuda, Dharmajaigarh, Distt. Raigarli (CG) ^T.RSTTS • . • gES^NDENTS -. 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Departmem of village Panchayaf and Social Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Deputy Director, Department of Village Panchayat and Social Welfare Raigarh (CG). 3, Chief Executive Officer, Dharmajaigarh, Distt. Raigarh 4. Sarpanch^ Gram Panchayat ShokhamuAi, Tah. Dharm^yaigarh, Distt. Raig^rh (Chhattisgarh). (V^TT PETTTTON TJNDER ARTICLE 226 /2.27 OF THE CONSTTTLmON OF INDTA) (SB: Hoii'Me Mr. K. AgiiJJiotn.-, ,L) pr^ent - Shri A..N. Bliokta, A<1vocate fnrtlie petrtio?ier. Shri S.dtish Guput, Govt Advocale Ibr the Stafce. Shri 8uii.il SRhu-.. AdvocM.e for the re^Doiid^iit No- 3, QRALORDER; (Passed on 31st oi Maicli, 2(%)§) With the conseiit ofthe pailies,, the matter is takeii up fbr hearmg fiiially. / The averment made by the leamed counsel appearing for the petitioiier m the present petition is contraryto the docusnents^ The leanied counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appoiiited as Paiichayat Kamii/Secretary 011 16.10.95 The order dated 16.10.95 issued on 30.10.95 (Aimexijre P/2) indicates that the petitioiier was appointed as •Paiicliayat Kaniii ri.^ the Panchayat Secretary. In view of the misleading and di^piited facts^ it is difficiilt fbr this Court to a.djiicJicMc1 the iiiatter. Thc p^titioii is accordiiigly dismiss^d^,. Howevcr^ the petitioiier is at liberty to ta.ke recoi.M^e to altemative remedy of st.atutory appeal that may be avaiiable to him, imder the provisions ofPanchayat Raj Adhmiyam, 1993. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1. 7..