mx :K;!"K INTHEHIGHKOUR'I!QIiviJUDieATUREArBlLASEUR_rG,G, WRrTPETII'IOWfSlNO; PETmONER Kailsah Prasad Mehar S/o Sri Gariga ErasaS'' KteHar^ ^Aged-aBoufc ;4S^: •years,;i woi)ang as ^pp^ ^ GoW, A;^ Middle',? s^^ (Kahakbira), bloefc- Sarangarh,^I)istt.- •Raigarh'[C;G.]^.,'^:.;::\,''l:;.,/lv:^;r^,:::.:'l:'., VERSUS RESPONDENTS '•••s.t ;KS?r SCllQOl D.K.S. ffisSisft-i. l(;»'3ajgg|1. ^iSI ^l.StafeofChhattisgarli^ ^TKrbygl-i- Educaticua ' :.^'BKawan,^KaiplM;^[e;.0.]': M •:^^^o ^E^&tion:^ffi<^(^ai^^i^||l||g^^ ^^:.^Bistt;-(RmgarKt©.<S.]^^^:^';^''Y,^^ -3; .EMief^ 'Exeeutive''. .officer,:' ^ZiIai ^,.:Panc^S5;^;RaigarH.[C.G',]\1.^';.1;.^', WI^EETITIONUI E^ARTieLE226^E CC)NSTmjTIQNOFINDIAIfQRISSUANCE;'C^.ABiROPRIAi '^WRIT.^ORD^::OKt) EGTT0NS^:.;....^? Tfaeabove'named petitidn^s mpst'hUmbly^^^ ;subfflit-ais:'under:^,^';-:,:'-:^.::.;\'?-:,'i':.1;.^^ . 1.,;- :.'...^:;:' •:;••-.'". l.RAimeUIARS^QElMlEPET'ITIEINER-^ ^ ; ;'^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ . -:.:.:~l,'.;As;:rnentiOneH.;ateove.'.':;:^^ ^.;'1:'.:, ' 2. PARncULARS;OFTHERE^QNDENTS- As mentioned. above....;';:'; :••.; ::;::' :"' 1 ' •'•:;: •:: ;'1;:1' •:^. •.-:;':-•':'^:- 3.W^RTIGULARS:.QF.^E^RDERS^'.';''-':;-|':^-':^^ ^Beanng ^ynQi .,6373/Stha.2^'.^¥u .?:iY''Raigat^Sda.ted^:^.^2^tQ:.^ss^ ^^::.:--v ':l^r.:i^^;^''"^y^i'^y;.^^;:'^ rec^n^^bytl ^petitioneron:04.Q1.2Ql:lY^^^^^ 'ljhti; i t'iSl^^lffStW^^ww^aswsfms^awv^: ^ fflGH COURT OF CHHATHSGAKH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 219_of2011 PETFnONER Kailsah Prasad Mehar. VERSUS State afCfahattisgarh & Otfaers. RESPONDENTS : WMT PETmON UNDER AR-HCLE 226 OF THE CONSTTrOTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Ue Shri Satish K. ABUihotri. J. Present: Shri D.R-Patel, Advocate for fliepefitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State, ORDERIORAD (Passed on 17^ day uf Janniuy; 2011) ; 1. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitionersubmits that <fae petitioner was engaged ia census work by nrder dated 30.03.2010 (.AnnexBreP/1) as Emuneratxn- under flie provisions of sub section (4) aCSection A,c>f'ftK Census At, 1948 (37 of 1948). Thereafter, by order dated 23.12.2010 (Aimexure P/2), flie petitioner was transfen"ed fewn Middle School, Saraipali, Kanak, to Middle School, Kapartunga, Saian^tli, DjsUct Raigath. , ' . . . • ; ., :„:.,',. .:, . : 1 2. The question asto whether an employee en^ged m census atay be transferred before completion of census woi^ <ame up iuto consideration befbre 10ais Covit m Ctiandnka Prasad Siijha v. State cf Chhattjsgarh , akmffwiih ofher connected matt6rs. This Court, havuig congidered all the aspects ofthe matter held tfaat an eraployee eng^ed m census may not be disturbed prior to its completion. Accordaigly, the writ petition filed by severalemployees was allowed, Shri Patel sufamits fhat the issue involved. herein is squarely oovered by (he decmon renderedby tfais Court in tfae above stated cases. 3. Shri Thakur, leamed Deputy Advocate Oeneral ^pearing for fhe State submits that fhere is no dispute wilfa rega-d to the aboitie stated subnassion and as such, tfae writ petition may be disposed of accorimgly. 4. Having regard to the facts situation of the case, the ^impugied orda dated23.12.2010 (Annexure P/2) in respect offlie petffioner, is quasdied and it is directed fhat the petitionet may continue at Ihe same place till the work ofcensus is complete. 5. Accordingly, fhe writ petition is disposed of. No order asto eosts. , ' W.P.(S) No. 3444/2010, decided on 05.10.2010 Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge .^•'~~-...—--'"