IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI MONDAY, THE 29TH AUGUST 2011 / 7TH BHADRA 1933 RP.No. 574 of 2011() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN MACA.1721/2004 Dated 09/02/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): APPELLANTS -------------------------------- 1. MERCY VARGHESE, W/O.DECEASED VARGHESE, MADATHILPARAMBIL HOUSE, SANKARANKUZHY LANE, MASJID ROAD, ALUVA. 2. JOSEPH CRUYEFF, S/O.VARGHESE, DO. 3. ANTONY CRIZ, S/O.VARHESE, DO. BY ADV. SRI.AYPE JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS:- --------------- 1. V.K.BINDU, D/O.KUMARAN, VELIATHU VEEDU, EDAYAPPURAM, ALUVA PO, PIN 683101. 2. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, IST FLOOR, KAP COMMERCIAL CENTRE, R.S.ROAD, ALUVA-683101. BY ADV. SRI. N.S.MOHAMMED USMAN FOR R2 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX ANNEXURE-AI: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE SENIOR MANAGER UNION BANK DATED 7-2-2011 ANNEXURE-AII: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE GEN. SECRETARY AIBEA. V.RAMKUMAR & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= R.P. No. 574 of 2011 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= Dated this the 29th day of August, 2011. O R D E R Ramkumar, J. Review petitioners are the appellants in the above appeal. As per the judgment dated 9.2.2011, this court allowed the appeal in part enhancing under the head of loss of dependency the amount from Rs.8,51,520/- to 10,20,000/-. Thus, the head of loss of dependency stands enhanced by Rs.1,68,480/-. While disposing the appeal this Court however omitted to mention that the said amount of Rs.1,68,480/- would carry interest. We accordingly allow this petition in part directing that the sum of Rs.1,68,480/- shall bear interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of MVOP. The other contention raised in the review petition being one on the merits of the case, the same does not involve any error of law apparent on the face of the record. We are therefore not inclined to uphold the same. 2. This review petition is accordingly allowed in part directing payment of interest alone as above. V.RAMKUMAR,JUDGE P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE rkc/mn