IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20326 of 2010 BIMLESH KUMAR DAS SON OF SRI NARAYANLAL DAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----- 2. 15.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the entire case is based on disputed accounting and in fact no offence u/s.420 I.P.C. is made out. In view of such, in the event of surrender of the petitioner, named above, within four weeks from today in connection with Araria P.S.case No.582 of 2009, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, subject to the conditions as laid down u/s.438(2) Cr.P.C. and (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner shall undertake to be represented on the first date after cognizance and in case he fails to do so, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled, (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the - 2 - given date and be present on the date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )