.‘ Li 2; Learnea counsei anpearing for the petmonas as weii as :eamed counsei appearing for the respondenisiSiate ioir‘my submit that 'i‘hE facts and question of iaw, invoived in fhe present writ petition‘ are ihe oame a$to thai of in ‘Va‘sEwani Kumar Qhafaciwag Vs. Municipai Corporaiien, m; g aod arother {2 i j Rn? R ~Lu go?» whmn nas oeer oxsooseo mvxoe oroe. odteo \E-a-A} ‘ J) #cooroingiy‘ the writ pemion is aimwoci m {ei’rm ‘f the order passed m the case of Yashwarrt Kumar Bhardaciwa} (supra) subieo’: ’m verifica’tmri or “me fact asro whether i‘ne pe‘ti‘rrcrwers have aoqu§red BEo‘fD ch/m‘xnMm Examinaiion Certificate on their ownexpensee as per ihe circuiare daierj 24—1 2-1 9Q8‘ and—i3— iggg and further whether they have Seer: said hvo advarrc-e irroz‘emer‘r’ie or mot, No order as to ooste. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Raw