HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5170 of 2010 ORDER: Heard both sides. The petitioner who is a third party seeks to assail the order, dated 08.10.2010, passed by the XI Additional Chief Judge (Fast Track Court), City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in I.A.No.2676 of 2008 in A.S.No.581 of 2007, in dismissing the application purportedly filed by him under Order I Rule 10 read with Section 151 C.P.C., praying the Court to implead him as one of the respondents in the said appeal, by way of filing this Revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The petitioner who is a third party wants to come on record in the said appeal as one of the respondents. Admittedly, the suit was filed for partition. Shorn off the unnecessary facts, it is sufficient to note that the chequered events which took place would go to show as to the existence of several proceedings between the parties, which necessitates the presence of the petitioner herein as well in the said appeal. If the request of the petitioner is granted, it helps to have a fairer and executable decree, rather than disallowing any such request. Especially, taking into account the fact that the suit is filed for partition, which is a very comprehensive one, in which all the issues can be raised so that appropriate decrees can be passed, it is quite desirable to allow the petitioner to come on record. Further, the entire endeavour on the part of the Court below should be to see that procedural laws are liberally interpreted so as to give due opportunity to all the parties who wants to have the same rather than allowing any orders behind their back to become final. In the circumstances, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside and consequently, I.A.No.2676 of 2008 in A.S.No.581 of 2007 on the file of the XI Additional Chief Judge (Fast Track Court), City Civil Court, Hyderabad, stands allowed. The Court below shall expedite the disposal of the main appeal itself. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, HACJ 19th November 2010 DR