1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9938 OF 2009 Shaikh Rashid Abdul ....Petitioner V/s. Sayyed M. Salauddin & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.R.V. Govilkar for the Petitioner. Mr.S.S. Kanetkar for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 8TH FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C. :- 1. The impugned order warrants no interference. 2. The order passed by A.S. Oka, J. dated 2.9.2009 is entirely misconstrued. The said order does not indicate and there is no provision of law which provides that a witness who appears pursuant to the witness summons can only be examined in respect of certain documents. Nor is there any provision to indicate that such a witness cannot be examined in respect of the documents not executed by him. If the deposition of the witness is permissible in law including under the Evidence Act, there is nothing that prevents the parties from leading the same. If there are any objections to the admissibility of the evidence sought to be led, it is always open to the parties to raise them. 3. It is not desirable that at every stage the Writ Petitions are filed 2 to challenge the orders in the middle of the trial. The same only delays the trial unnecessarily. 4. It is further stated that even the cross-examination of the witness is over. For that reason also, no interference is called for in respect of the impugned order. 5. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed.