IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47394 of 2007 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH @ RAJESH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 15.5.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. This matter was passed over yesterday to facilitate assistance of the counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no.2 but there is no representation even today. From the order dated 27.3.2008 there is reflection that an attempt was being made by the Principal Judge, Bhojpur at Ara for reconciliation. Today Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per his instructions telephonically the two sides have reconciled and the husband and wife are now living together at the husband’s place of work. If better sense has come to prevail, may be at the intervention of a Judicial Officer assigned with such responsibility, it will be desirable that the petitioner should be enlarged on bail to bring about harmony between the parties. In absence of any contradiction of statement made by the counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner, namely, Rajesh Kumar Singh @ Rajesh Singh, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction of Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Complaint Case No.1007(C) /06, subject to conditions under Section 438(II) of the Cr.P.C. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)