IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 17839 of 2001 Between: P.Narayana, Hindu S/o. P.Adivaiah, Subash Road, R/o. Sadasivapet, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Superintending Engineer, PED(R&B), Nizamabad Circle, Nizamabad. 2 Rao & Rao Constructions, Rep. by I.Venkateswara Rao, R/o. Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not considering the price bid of the petitioner pertaining to work relating to Peddapuram Anantasagar road as notified in tender notice No.14/2001-2002 dt. 23.7.2001 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently directing the 1st respondent to consider the price bid of the petitioner for the award of said work. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: MR.P.VINAYAKA SWAMY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: G.P. for Transport. The Court made the following : ORDER: Sri C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in this writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. 7.7.2005 CVM To, 1 Superintending Engineer, PED(R&B), Nizamabad Circle, Nizamabad. 2 2 CCs to G.P. for Transport, High Court buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 3. 2 CD copies.