IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH DECEMBER 2009 / 20TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3800 of 2009() ------------------------------ CMP.8103/2009 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, TIRUR (CRIME No.898/2009 OF TIRUR POLICE STATION) .................... REVN. PETITIONER/ACCUSED: --------------------------------- IBRAHIMKUTTY, S/O.HUSSAINAR, KUNNATH HOUSE, KUTTAYI, MANGALAM AMSOM, MALAPPURAM. BY MR.C.V.MANUVILSAN, ADVOCATE MR.P.K.KHALEEMUDHEEN, ADVOCATE MR.P.G.SURESH, ADVOCATE SMT.K.VIDYA MANUVILASAN, ADVOCATE MR.M.R.VIBIN, ADVOCATE RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: -------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUR, REPRESENTED THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.JAYAKRISHNAN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.S.GOPINATHAN,J. ========================= Crl.R.P.No.3800 of 2009 ========================== Dated this the 11th day of December, 2009 ORDER The revision petitioner is the accused in Crime.No.898/2009 of Tirur Police Station for offence punishable under Sections 448, 323 and 498(A) I.P.C. While granting bail on his application, among other things a condition was imposed by the Judicial Magistrate of First Class Court, Tirur, that the revision petitioner shall surrender the passport. Accordingly he surrendered the passport. Later he filed C.M.P.No.8103/2009 seeking order to lift the condition and to return the passport. By the order impugned dated 17.11.2009, the learned magistrate dismissed the petition. Now this petition. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the matter has been settled between the revision petitioner and his wife. The learned public prosecutor also submitted that he had instruction that the matter has been settled and in the above circumstances the prosecution has no objection to release the passport to the revision petitioner. In the above circumstances, while allowing the revision petition the order Crl.R.P.No.3800/2009 2 impugned would stand modified and that there would be an order to return the passport to the revision petitioner. P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE. dvs