1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1971 OF 2009 Chhotela H.Yadav .. Petitioner. Vs. The Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.N.V.Gangal for the petitioner. Mr.M.M.Malandkar for the respondents. Coram: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 27TH JULY, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This petition challenges the following order: “Read. Heard. It is the duty of deft. To comply with the provisions of law. If they are not complying they may suffer. Court can not insist the party to file documents. I see no merit. It is dismissed.” 3. The aforesaid order was passed in the Notice of Motion taken out by the petitioner seeking direction to the defendant to produce original set of documents referred to and relied upon in their written statement under Order 8 Rule 1-A of the Code of Civil Procedure. Mr.Gangal, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the respondent- corporation gives inspection of the document referred to and 2 relied upon by the petitioner in their written statement. Mr.Malandkar, learned counsel for the Corporation, on instructions, submits that the corporation will give inspection of all the documents within a period of three weeks from today. His statement is accepted. In view of the statement nothing further survives in the petition and it is disposed of as such. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)