IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14241 of 2010 1. MUSHARU SAH 2. DEO NARAYAN SAH Both sons of late Bauku Sah, residents of Village and P.O.-Bhawanipur, P.S.- Bhawanipur, District-Purnea. …………….Petitioners. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, 2. COLLECTOR, PURNEA, 3. SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DHAMDAHA (PURNEA), 4. ANCHAL ADHIKARI, BHAWANIPUR (PURNEA), 5. THE SECRETARY, BHOODAN YAGNA COMMITTEE, RANIPATRA, P.S. PURNEA SADAR, DISTRICT-PURNEA, 6. SMT. SHEELA MISHRA @ SHILLA MISHRA, WIFE OF LATE HIRA NATH MISHRA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O.-BHAWANIPUR, P.S.-BHAWANIPUR, DISTRICT-PURNEA, AT PRESENT RESIDING NEAR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KOTHI AND KOSI COLONY, P.S.- K. HAT, TOWN AND DISTRICT-PURNEA. ………………Respondents. ----------- 05 13.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Present application arises out of a mutation proceeding. Petitioners assail the order dated 08.04.2009, passed by respondent- Collector in Mutation Revision Case No. 102/2007 (Annexure-5), whereby the revision preferred by the petitioners was rejected. Admittedly, the matter arises out of a mutation proceeding. It is settled law that mutation neither creates nor extinguishes title. Mutation is done only for the purpose of realization of rent. After hearing both sides, this Court is of the view that there is an issue involved with regard to title relating to the lands in question. In that view of the matter, this Court without interfering with the order impugned, disposes of this application with an observation that if Safik ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. ) any of the parties to this proceeding approaches appropriate forum/court for appropriate relief(s) any observation/finding made in the order shall not prejudice him in any manner.