IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2010 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 8133 of 2010() ---------------------------------------- CRIME NO.1306/2010 OF UDAYAMPEROOR POLICE STATION ERNAKULAM DIST. ..... ACCUSED (S): PETITIONER --------------------------------------- MADAVAN @ RAJESH ,AGED 35 YEARS KALATHINGAL THARA, AMBELIPADAM,VYTTILA, JANATHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.NOW RESIDING AT RAKHI MANDIRAM, THIRUNALLOOR, PALLIPPURAM, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.A.MUJEEB COMPLAINANT/ RESPONDENT -------------------------------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss V.RAMKUMAR, J. --------------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.8133 of 2010 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of December, 2010 ORDER The petitioner, who is the sole accused in Crime No.1306 of 2010 of Udayamperoor Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 308 I.P.C., seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 22/09/2010. The petitioner was surrendered on 06/11/2010. 2. The learned public prosecutor opposed the application contending inter alia that the victim in this case is none other than the wife of the petitioner who had sustained eight stab injuries and the petitioner is involved in eight other crimes besides involved in KAPPA case. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioner, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioner is released Bail Appln.No.8133/2010 : 2 : on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj