IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14154 of 2010 1. SYED PARVEZ AKHTAR 2. SYED TARIQUE AKHTAR 3. SYED JAMIL AKHTAR ---------------------- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 25.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in cause title of the main application. The allegation is about giving job in Air Force in lieu of Rs. One lac by the informant which is doubted on the ground that a case filed on behalf of sister of petitioner nos.1 and 2 and daughter of petitioner no.3 against the informant and his other family members for the offence under section 498A IPC is pending in which they are witnesses. According to learned counsel for the petitioners, there could be no occasion to have such negotiations on the other point, in my view, if any payment is made for obtaining job by illegal means by making payment of money that comes within definition of bribe giver of which is also accused, any statement given on his behalf is nothing more than confession basing 2 which refusal of anticipatory bail never can be justified. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura in Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 62/2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)