1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 268 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5098 OF 2009 Mr. Ravindra Sopanrao Ghanvat ).. Appellant Versus Tata Motors Limited ).. Respondent Mr. N.A. Kulkarni for the Appellant. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 11TH NOVEMBER 2009 P.C. The present Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the order dated 24th August 2009. Vide the impugned order, the learned Single Judge exercised the judicious discretion and declined to condone the delay of almost three years as no plausible reasons or sufficient cause were shown for condoning the delay. Even before us hardly any sufficient or plausible reasons have been explained for condonation of such inordinate delay. Besides this, the learned Single Judge has exercised discretion in the facts and circumstances of the case. We see no error of jurisdiction in exercise of discretion by the learned Single Judge. Letters Patent Appeal dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.