IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24972 of 2008 VAKIL RAI @ VAKIL SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 26.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is in custody in relation to Jakkanpur P.S. Case No. 44 of 2008 for offence under sections 302, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation in the FI.R. is that the son-in-law of the deceased in connivance with some other persons eliminated him with a view to grab the property of the deceased. Petitioner’s role has emerged in the investigation as one of the persons who conspired in hiring certain professional criminals for the job. There is no evidence however, that he actually took part in the crime and at the most it is a case of conspiracy. Keeping the evidence which has come in the matter and also the fact that the petitioner has been in custody for a while, let the petitioner, namely, Vakil Rai @ Vakil Singh, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Jakkanpur P.S Case No. 44 of 2008. One of the sureties will be executed by the wife of the petitioner. Rajeev/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) - 2 -