IN TE HIGH wUR‘I‘ OF JUEIL‘ATURE AT BIWPW(CHHATTEGARH) wan‘ pa'rrrxon Nb, 2‘~}ZL[0F 2003 / mTxTIom 1 Sam: A11, son of shri Mohd.A11. aged about 33 years Jim-king as’ Constable , (Trade Garpenter). posted a; Range Police Motor Transpori: Workshop.81135pnr. Distric-Bilaspur. (me. . $hamlal ike,son of Siv mran, aged about 42 yars .Worki as ‘ Hea constab1e,('rrade carpenter) poste at Ran oimotor Tramport rkop.Blasux- District-Bilaspur, (c.G ) sandeep s;hrastava,son H.. ‘ $hrivastava,aged about 38 yars. wormng as wad Constab 1e (M '‘ ._) Polie ,Motor 'rra nspoz-t Wor hep . Bilas pur , Dis trict-Bilaspur ( C.G . ) Unio of India. throuh the $ecretar.nertment of ersonn and TrainigJii/nistry ‘1 oi ome “fairsJIew De pel n 5tate o Madhya Pradesh. through the Secretary,neparunen of t acme Afiairsanabn Bhawan. Bhopa1.M.P.) ta te o Chh t is garh . throug the eretryJJepartmen of ‘ Home Affairs .D.x g5: .Bhawan. Mangralaya , Raipur. (C. G. wan pannon omen mucous zzyzz'p—oi" m Lockoi‘rr‘m‘xon or iron p$ . t ) Uy h . e ng d d ge Plce WoShip. . iv of s e . i c ks n g V ypa H ng. i w ‘ S f a t h Scat ) , HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Singie Bench: Hcn’bls Mr. JustiCE Satish K. Agnihotri. Wn't Petition No. 2724 of 2003 Petitioner Sabir Ali and two othm‘s Vsrsus Respoudgnts Union of India, & others Shri Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate for the patitioncrs. Shri S. K: Ben'wa], Standing counsel for Respondent No. 1. Shri Sachin Shlgh Rajput for Respondent No. 2. Shri Alok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for tho respondent No. 3, ORAL ORDER (8'11 February, 2006) The following order of the Court was passed by Satish K. Agihotri, J. 1. Leaxned counsel appealing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are working in the Motor Transport Workshop, Bilaspur. They are permanent resident of the State of Madhya Pradesh. The petitioners have been allocated to the State of L Chhattisgarh and they want their reallocation to the State of Madhya Pradesh, Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instruction, submits that the petitioners be granted liberty to make a representation to the respondents for redressal of their i grievances, Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection to the said submission. In View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of finally, with 1 liberty to the peutioners to make an appropriate representation to the respondents/authorities concerned, within a period ‘of two weeks from today, and the respondents/authorities are directed to consider and decide the same, in an. objective manner, in accordance with law, Within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, if any. (IEI “he“ (3U py , aS p€} R ll'eS . i i sd/‘- 0t i Satish K.Agnihotri t y":=e ‘ e Judge r ‘ ’ Thakur " I