spb/- 1 ca-258-08.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 258 OF 2008 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 21181 OF 2008 1a. Mrs. Cecelia Pereira & Ors. ... Applicants/Appellants. V/s. 1 Mrs. Lucy Tellis (deceased deleted) 1(a) Mrs. A.C.De Sales & Ors. ... Respondents. --- Ms. Naseem Patrawala i/by Pravin Metha & Mithi & Co. for the Applicants/Appellants. Ms. Bernadette (Bernie) Tellis, the Respondent No.3, in person. ----- CORAM : D. G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 21st JANUARY, 2011. P.C. 1 The Farad Note dated 17th June, 2009 shows that the notice of Respondent No.1(a) was returned unserved with remark “not staying at given address” and that notice of Respondent No.1(d) returned unserved with remark “want of correct address”. Thereafter, by a conditional order dated 19th June, 2009 this court directed the applicants to take steps to serve the unserved respondents within two weeks, failing which the application shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution against unserved respondents without further reference to the court. The Farad Note dated 10th of July, 2009 shows that the steps were not taken and hence, as per the conditional order dated 19th June, 2009, the application stood spb/- 2 ca-258-08.sxw dismissed against respondent no.1(a) and 1(d). 2 Since the application has been dismissed against Respondent No. 1(a) and 1(d), who are the necessary parties to the delay condonation application, the entire civil application for condonation of the delay stands dismissed. [D.G. KARNIK, J.]