Civil Revision No. 5091 of 2010 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5091 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.8.2010 Smt. Poonam .....Petitioner Versus District Town Planner, Karnal ….Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri C.M. Munjal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present petition is to the order passed by the learned first Appellate Court on 4.8.2010, whereby while issuing fresh notice to the present petitioner for 16.8.2010, the implementation of the order dated 24.7.2010 was stayed. The learned first Appellate Court, has found that the present petitioner is avoiding the service intentionally. A perusal of the order passed by the learned first Appellate Court, shows that it is an interim order and the appeal is listed for hearing before the first Appellate Court today itself. It is open to the petitioner to contest the appeal on merits before the first Appellate Court. Civil Revision No. 5091 of 2010 (O&M) [2] In view of the said fact, I do not find any reason to interfere with the ad interim order passed by the learned first Appellate Court. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. [ HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 16.8.2010 ds