C^ l^/- ^?//-^^ •••'^ ^\t*'' ^^, IN THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR .1^? ^y/ ^l M.A.fC) N0. ^(,D Of-WW ?^AJ APPELLANT/ '>" RESP.N0.3 RESPONDENTS APPLICANT , The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Divisional OfGce-I, Post Box No.49, Medical College Road, Kachahari Road, Raipur-492901 (CG) VERSUS ivita allies Sarita Yadav w/o Naresh Yadav Aged 30 years, Resident of Santoshi Nagar, Durgapara, Raipur. RESPONDENT N0.2>/-'Panchram s/o Sonuram Kanwar, ('I&SPONDENT N0.1 Resident of Bhothali, Tehsil: Kurd, Dist: Dhamtari. RESPONDENT N0.3.:^&4/s. Prakash Enterprises, Proprietor RgSPONDENT N0.2 Kailash Shukla, Kurd, Dist:Dhamtari. MISC APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 QF MOTQR VEHICLE ACT. 1988. HO ApDeliant Respondent No,3 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sinale Bench : Hon'bie Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh. J. 7?r~""""~~' IVIiscelianeous Appeal (P.R.lNo.1321/2007 tv)/y\-^; Ss~»/i?^ The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Divisional Office-1, Post Box No.49, Medical Coliege Road, Kachahari Chowk, Raipur (CG). Versus 1. Savita allies Sarita Yadav W/o Naresh Yadav, Aged 30 years, Resident of Santoshi Nagar, Durgapara, Raipur. 2. Panchram S/o Sonuram Kanwar, Resident of Bhothali, Tehsil Kurud, District Dhamtari. 3. M/s Prakash Enterprises, Proprietor, Kailash Shukla, Kurud, Distt.Dhamtari. Respondents Aoplicant ResBondentNo,2 Respondent No.1 Respondent No.3 Respondent No.2 Misc. Appeal under Section 1 73 of the Motor Vehictes Act. 1988. Present : Shri Sudhir Agrawat, counsel for the appellant. ORALORDER (Passed on 07th March, 2008) Heard on I.A.No.1, which is an application for converting the Miscellaneous Appeal into Revision. (2) Shri Sudhir Agrawal, leamed counsel for the appellant did not dispute that the awarded amount i.e,Rs.3,500/- being less than Rs.10,000/-, the appea! is not maintainable under Section 173(2) of the Motor Vehicies Act. (3) I have gone through the impugned award. 1 am not inclined to grant permission for converting the Miscellaneous Appeal into Revision. (4) Since this appeal does not lie under sub Section 2 of Section 173 of the Motor Vehictes Act, it is dismissed. Sd/- DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge Tumane \: '' ^