IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39629 of 2008 QUAISAR ALAM SON OF YUNUS ALAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – SATAL ISTAMRAR P.S. – KISHANGANJ DISTRICT - KISHANGANJ Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.12.2008 Heard the parties. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offences under Section 376 the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is that on false pretext of marrying with the informant, petitioner used to have sexual intercourse for continuous three months which resulted pregnancy to her. Thereafter, petitioner refused to marry her. Submission is that the alleged action on the part of the petitioner was with her consent and the present case has been lodged in retaliation of an earlier case filed by his mother. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that considering the nature of allegation, the petitioner is not entitled to privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to - 2 - grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)