WP(C) 2569/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HN SARMA Heard Mr. P. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Banik, learned St anding counsel, KAAC. The petitioner is serving as Hindi teacher in Jiribasa M.E. Sch ool, Mailoo in the District of Karbi Anglong, Assam since 1991. While the petiti oner was serving in the aforesaid school as Hindi teacher, all on a sudden the p etitioner was transferred by the Inspector of Schools, Diphu vide impugned orde r dated 18.6.09 to Rongpongbong M.E. School and in his place respondent No.9 has been posted. It is contended by Mr. Sarma that the concerned authority select ed the petitioner and the respondent No.2 for transfer allowing other teachers t o remain in their respective school. It is further contended that as per own po licy of the Govt. an officer need not necessarily be transferred when he complet es three years in one station if the public interest is not involved and it is s ubmitted by Mr. Sarma that in the instant case the public interest is not involv ed. However, against the aforesaid transfer order, the petitioner has submitted a representation before the authority on 23.6.09 (Annexure-H) but the authority has not applied its mind to dispose of the said representation nor passed any or der till date. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and taking not e of the nature of dispute involved in this writ petition, I am inclined to disp ose of this writ petition at the motion stage itself with certain direction. Acc ordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of with the direction that the conc erned authority before whom the representation mentioned above has been filed, t he same shall be taken up for consideration and be disposed of within a period o f three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Till the disposal of the said representation, the petitioner be allowed to continue in his present post. This disposes of the writ petition.