IN THB HIGH COURT ©FWDIGKEURS AT BII.ASPUK (C.G.) ^•P,NO.^ ^&©F2001 BgTNSSN Kalyan Qingh Sonwani S/o Late Shxri Manohar Sorwani^ ag@d 6S years e:: Nani Bai W/o Kalyan Si^gh Sonwani^ aged 5§ y©ars<» Bofeh res^denfc of Village Sarbada^ P»S». Abhanpurj1 Distriat Dhamtari (©hhiQttisgarh)^ ^^•'' ' A»^^ ^^1 ^'A- PS¥S%EONERS v>< A N D ^o 1» t. Dharmin Bai aged about 27 years 3/6 Late Rajesh Sonwanl^ C/D Jagat Ram Haghet^ Chhattisgarh ^ur^edic Ddbspensary Dallirajhara^ District Durg t 2^ 2nd Civtl i3udge Class I/ Raipur^ RESPONDBNTS WRIT PETlTtON-'UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF Tffi; GONSTITOTION QF INDIA -F XI-HC-22 ~3^[ ';^TRT?FT, "@~^F?^, i^<rtl'H^< __......W.o.P.....No<....3.4§/?001. WR^iI ^Hl^ ' ^i^ 200 ^T^T^FT f^TW^T^T ^?H?^ <-{[ia ^fr'':' . 'SH^T'^lF^R Trf^Tf The mofcher of the -child is 4 chil.d is about ten years^ -I happy with his gran^-fatherj; ^TRfe^T ^TR^Tf'? ferSt "^TSR "^^ri^R^Tr^T 10/5/2001 Heard Mro Prashant M^shra^ learned counsel for the petition.er and Mro ^wadh Tr4.pathi'g learned-counsel ¥ith Kume jahanara Khan. for the ^espondento The child - Master Ni^.esh Kumar is produced as directed< Iso present in my chambero The asked the child ^hether he is He says ye^ and he would .like to continue to stay.with hi^ grand-father I asked him whether ^^^/ he ^ould like to g©.tohisy^^w "and he says noo I asked him ¥hether he recQgnises hlj The main petition for| still pending •a^.Raipuro Tlrj High Court regarding an irta^rim order. of custody It appears that the Court ati and paas necessary'final or^ matter is always a very deJj the matfcer is not likely:to s mother and he says yese :©fthis young boy is up 1s mafcter has come/before the the child . Raipur must hear .the parties •ers without further delayo Such Acateone^ :^herefore^ the Court should handle this matter c^refullyo -It is submitted that Ibe decided in the immediate futureo Hencea a pray^r ha^ been made that atwleast during tMs short period before thej matt^' is finally decided by the |ZInd Clvil,Judge, Class-I al Raipur^ the mother may be ^lSieil»Jjlt-@ri^ Gu^fr.rsdy 'nf. ^^^Js^yL^.-^MGao^^lujg^^Q^^^^^ |'T7t%ife^ ..2 r" T^ ^TT^T^I f^^S^T 'iT^n^'^Tf^i' 3:IT^T 1T3^? ( ^^^y ) o e Tripathia such arrang.emenlt mother is most natural Mr, Prashant MisNra petitioner submits that a|: age of 5 years^ mother i^ guardian^ Be that as Ij' ^rv^, •^'^ TA^J^ f^L^o^,^^^ told <j all_the lawyer s and /? ~"^ willing td go to his mot^er8 be fair for this Court t^ mothero Let there be a of custody of this young '^Flfe'^h' 'RW^f "H f^^ Tf^?R ^3rf?<T??^i^T will. be reasonable as the gjuardian o s learned counsel for the Ifter the child crosses the not absolute^: natural ix-^'L |t may® sinc.e this f^- Ihis mother that he is n.. -t s place today^ it may not -^ . • _ , --tr' k4» say that 'y^y should ^^h-s-yo-ur ^inal solution to the question jboy at the earliest^ In the results thljs petition is disposed of with the direction that tihe Ilnd Civil Judge, Classl at Raipur shall hear and Act Case n0o8/1999 withir^ Idispose of Guardian and ¥iards a month commencing from is for thASJ Court to- tak^ j o£ Justlceo 18/6/2001o If the«said C|ourt holds vacation Courfc^ it i^ this matter in the interest Learned counsel fqr the petltioner shallfsabmit a.coRy of this order to ^he concerned-Court wit&J,n ten dayso .Till .the matter .i^ flnally decided by the Court below^ the child shall ecjntinue to be in the custody of his grand-fathero Sd/- Chief Justice .[_ GRPRJ--FS/311—1/2001—50,000. 9^