CWP No.11150 of 2011 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11150 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.08.2011 Nikhil Kant Syal s/o Late Sh. R.K. Syal, H.No.573, Sector 12, Panchkula ... Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present: Mr. Jasjit Singh Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Kirti Singh, DAG, Haryana, for the respondents. ***** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? NO K. KANNAN, J. (Oral) 1. The counsel for the State filed written statement contending that the petitioner's complaint is not genuine and the investigation has revealed that the petitioner has sold some property amounting to over `2,00,00,000/- and is still making complaints against the purchasers. The counsel for the State, however, states that if the petitioner has any apprehension about the safety for his life and liberty, appropriate protection will be given to the petitioner. As a matter of fact, this Court while entertaining the petition and ordering notice on 20.06.2011, has directed that the petitioner could approach the Superintendent of Police, Panchkula and if, he found the life CWP No.11150 of 2011 (O&M) [2] and liberty of the petitioner is under threat and deserves protection, he will take appropriate steps. 2. I do not find any more direction necessary and the petitioner will have at all times an access to the Superintendent of Police, Panchkula to seek for redressal of his grievance and as such, if any, request is made by the petitioner, it shall be duly considered on its own merit and appropriate action shall be taken. 3. The writ petition is disposed of as above. ( K. KANNAN ) JUDGE 17th August, 2011 Rajan