HSGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BSLASPUR Writ Petition (S\ No. 739 of 2008 Petjfjoner Versus Respondents 1, Smt. AIka GanguSy. W/o. Shri D.K.Ganguly, aged 42 years, QccupatSon - Semce, postecl as 1-S.M., Hira Nagar, Middle Schooi, Sirgitti, Bilaspur (C.G.) State of Chhattissarh. Through Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Djst"ct Education Officer, Dlstrict- BJSaspur(C.G.) WR!T PETITOIN UNDER ARTSCLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF INDIA StngSe Bench : Hon'bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri indrasen Sahu, Advocato for the petitionQr. Shri A. 8. Kachwaha, Deputy' Advocate Genera! forthe respondents. Thakur ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 4th day of February, 2008) Learned counsel appeanng for the petjtioner as v/eSi as learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts and ques^on of taw, involved in the present writ petition, are the same asto that of In Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Munlcipa! Corporation. Durg and another (2006 (II) MPJR-CG 9S), whlch has been dssposed of vjde ordsrdated 3.4.2006. Accordingly, the 'A'rit petition is aSlo'vved In terms ofthe order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (supra), subject to verifjcation of the fact asto whether the petltloner has acquired B.Ed./B.T.I. Examinatlon Certlftcate on hls own expenses, as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order asto coste. _-^^—- Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge