-i- C .f'lc3G IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. AT - BltASPUR W.P.No.o^f-^ OF 2006 PETITIONER / SAKHA RAM KUNJAM AGED-43YEARS SON OF SHRI SONAU RAM KUNJAM POSTED AS - ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, AT - GOVT. COLLEGE, NARAYANPUR, DISTRICT-BASTERIC.G.) R/0 NARAYANPUR (BASTER) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. T <^'^ •s, ^'^r ^^"- ^ef^ 2. y^.-l!'"L. ^<s^\'3.>" ^t^S^1''' ^yy 'y STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH - THE SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, AAANTRALAYA D. K. S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR SHRI KAMLESH KUMAR MARKAM, POSTED AS - ASSISTANT PROFESSOR AT - GOVT. COLLEGE, CHARAMA, DISTRICT-BASTERIC.G.) / WRIT PETmON U/A - 226 & 227of Consiihrtion of India XI-HC-22 's^i •^i'yid^, •^^•y'l'c, (oicii+i*i< 3TI^T •v^TSK ^^..y^.P.ES^gt.y *<iiwi aiiich ~ ^ '"' • ^^ST' sn^i'?;! R-li'b 3^1 ^HI^> ^fe^ - ^ aii^r ^^iiwHfer 12,6.2006:- Shri R.K. Kesharwani, counsel Shri Ashutosh Kachchwaha, respondent No.1. Heard both the counsel. The <;ase of the petitioner is respondent No.2 on ttie post of Assi^l 1989. The respondent No.2 was regf whereas the petitioner has been regulj petitioner and respondent No.2 were petitioner was not regularized in fhe f< was regularized. Thus a dJscriminator^ petitioner and for that the petitioner ha^ P/6 to the Commissioner, Higher E( so far. .1 In the circumstances, learned cf that the petitjoner may be allowed to respondent No.1 and he be directed| petitioner consjdering his grievance| respondent No.1 has no objection. Request made by learned couns^ Having heard learnedcounsel f^ the facts and circumstances of the cas^ a detailed representation to respondenf from today and in turn respondetit representation ofthe petitioner wjthjn s| fcjir the petitioner. IGovt. Advocate for theState/ •*l'yfcl''fl-1 'WRff.^ fezl' tRltdK ^arPtPTsn^r tfiat he was appointed along with ^tant Professor on 23rd, December ijjlarized with effect from 24.12.98 ^rized with effect from 2005. The ^ppointed on the same day. The jfew 1998 when respondent No.2 treatment has been given to the made a r,epresentation Annexure- du4atjon, but nothing has been done {>unsel for the petitionersubmitted ^nake a detailed representation to to d&cide representation of the to which learned counsel for ^l for the petitioner is just andfair. tr the parties and having regard to 1, the petitioner is directed to make if No. 1 withih a periocf of 2 weeks No.1 Is directed to decide period of 4 months from the date © '. . . . ['^ ^Ra^ <[,-.^..A-i XI-HC-22 'ssi -^ww^, ^•dl'y'i'o, fsiMi'yy HT«T?(1 th*11<*) •M 200 I^B^sr' 311^1 ^lT h-u* sf^y sii^'i^ ^fea rve -7'< ^ '•^ SIT^I ^aiwgf??i ^' or receiptof representation, after the representation, in accordance With the direction aforesaid, Parties are entitled for certifiey with the c^nsidering all the grievances raised in law. petition stands disposed of. copy of this order. -— r SdA : L.C. Bhadoo Judge cbl'<f<'l<fl-1 IWl-il' ^ feet^tdK ^; sipgif aii^i ^ [Tit^ V<a'\