H1GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3427 of 2007 PETITIQNERS •-,< K 1. Suresh Kumar Yadav, Aged about 49 years, S/o. Late Shri Luduram Yadav, Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Puswada, Kanker, 2. Rameshwar Lal Nevendra, Aged about 49 years, S/o. Shri Heera Ram Nevendra, Assistant Teacher, Middie School, Bagodar, Kanker 3. Shiv Prasad Kurram, Aged about 43 years, S/o. Itwaru Ram Korram, Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Iradah, Kanker 4. Ram Vishal Jain, Aged about 50 years, S/o. Shri Rom Singh Jain, Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Satlok, Kanker All are at Block Kanker, Distt. Kanker VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. The Director, Public Instruction, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, Kanker District Kanksr (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Kanker (C.G.) 5. Treasury & Funds Department, Kanker WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA t* \ SingieBench : Hon'bie Mr. Justlce Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Mr. D.N. Prajapati, Advocate for thepetitioners. Mr. Arvind Dubey.Panel lawyer for the respondents/State. '^S^^SSSS^.SZ.^T^^V. ^,0 \. .-^.. ORDER (Passed on 22"a dayof June, 2007) The question of taw invotved herein is asto whether ttie petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of inftial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. Learned counsel appearing for thepetitioners as well as for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in W.P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushit Tiwari and others vs. State Government of Ghhattisgarh and others), which was allowed vide orderdated 7.11.2006. In view of the above-stated siibmissions made by leamed counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petib'on is allowed in the same terms. No orderas to costs. __- Karuna Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge ^