IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6840 of 2009 Date of decision: March 10, 2011 Harinderpal Kaur .. Petitioner Vs. Narinder Pal Singh (dead) through legal heirs and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. P.K. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate for the respondents. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) This petition assails the order dated 6.10.2009 (Annexure P6) passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Faridkot, whereby the application filed by the respondent No.1 for amendment of the written statement has been allowed. Learned counsel for both the parties are agreeable on the one point that the order of the trial court does not contain the grounds for allowing the application. It allowed the application after citing some judgments and also the judgment delivered in case Usha Balashaheb Swami & others vs. Kiran Appaso Swami and others 2007 (2) RCR (Civil) 830. No doubt, this judgment refers to some guidelines for amendment of the pleadings but the trial court has not observed as to if the case of the respondent is covered by which of guidelines. In the circumstances, it has become inevitable to set aside the impugned order. Resultantly, this petition is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the case is remitted back to the trial court to decide the application for amendment of the written statement a fresh. Parties are directed to appear before the trial court on the date already fixed before the trial court. March 10, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge