IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. No. 2565 of 2008. Decided on: 30th August, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Bhagat Ram. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge: Mr. G.R. Palsra, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present lis is covered by the judgment dated 21.05.2007, rendered by this Court in Vijay Kumar and others Vs. State of H.P. & others, C.W.P. No. 1439 of 2002. He also submits that in fact the respondent-State has also calculated the amount, but the same has not been released for the reasons best known to it. 2. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioner for payment of compensation strictly as per the principles laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove, within a period of one month from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. Copy dasti, on usual terms. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge August 30, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - - 3 - `