CWP(T) No. 6966/2008 21.09.2010 Present: Mr. S. S. Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. J. S. Rana, Asstt. A.G. for the respondents It is not in dispute that the scheme under which the petitioner’s case for appointment was to be considered is no longer in vogue. At the time when petitioner approached the Court no interim relief was also granted to him. Further, petitioner was not found to be more meritorious and consequently his name was not recommended for appointment as Vidya Upasak in IRDP general category. 2. From the record, it could not be shown as to how any legally enforceable right of the petitioner stands violated. Consequently, petition being devoid of merit is dismissed. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. September 21, 2010 (rana)