IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38483 of 2009 1. PAPPU BHAGAT, SON OF RAM LAKHAN BHAGAT. 2. RAM LAKHAN BHAGAT, S/O LATE YADU BHAGAT. 3. PHUL KUMARI DEVI, W/O RAM LAKHAN BHAGAT. ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-DAMODARPUR, P.S.-BENIPATTI, DISTRICT-MADHBANI. .............PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR .................OPP. PARTY. ----------- 2/ 21.12.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are the brother-in-law, father-in-law and mother-in-law of the informant. Case has been instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 498(A)/34 of the IPC and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. As per the allegation, the demand of colour T.V and motorcycle was not fulfilled, as such, the informant was tortured and finally ousted from the matrimonial home. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the informant herself is not willing to live in the family. Allegations have been made just to put pressure on the petitioners. Considering the fact, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioners is allowed. They are directed to be released on bail, in case of their appearance before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Benipatti P.S. 2 Case No. 116 of 2009 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)