IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10263 of 2010 1. MD.AHRAR ALAM S/O MD. ILYAS R/O VILL KANHARIYA, P.S.AMOUR, DISTT-PURNEA---------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF H.R.D GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION NEW SECRETARIATE, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE PURNEA 5. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER PURNEA 6. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER PURNEA 7. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION PURNEA 8. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER AMOUR, PURNEA 9. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER AMOUR, PURNEA 10. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ NITENDAR 11. THE PANCHAYAT SACHIV NITENDRA PANCHAYAT, DISTT-PURNEA 12. THE MEMBER, DISTRICT TEACHER APPOINTMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY PURNEA 13. NIRAJ KUMAR SINGH S/O DILIP SINGH R/O VILL NITENDRA, P.S.AMOUR, DISTT-PURNEA 14. SWATANTRA KUMAR SINGH S/O JAI NARAIN SINGH R/O VILL NITENDRA , P.S.AMOUR, DISTT-PURNEA---------RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 3.3.2011 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State the Court is satisfied that there is no legal infirmity with the decision rendered by the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Purnea. The order which is under challenge in the present writ application is annexure-1. This is so because after 1.7.2006 there is no post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra and therefore removal of “A” does not mean that the petitioner gets a right for appointment on the post which does not exist any more. The appellate authority has committed no mistake by not giving direction for appointment of the petitioner. This writ application has no merit and it is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)