IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 589 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 24/03/2008 in WP NO : 12662 OF 2001 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 A.P. State Textile Develoment Corporation Limited, rep. by its Managing Director, Chenetha Bhavan, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 Gudavarthi Tatayya, S/o. Venkaitah, R/o. D.No. 5/28, Dantumilli Road, Pedana, Krishna District. 3 V. Ananda Rao, S/o. Salman Raju, R/o. Ward No.19, Gas Factory Road, Valandapalem, Krishna District. 4 B. Subba Rao, S/o. Venkata Swamy, Circaltota, Chilakalapudi, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 5 Md. Ismail, S/o. Abbass Ali, R/o.D.No.28/874, Jalalpeta, Machilipatnam. 6 V. Basavaiah, S/o. Kotaiah, R/o. D.No.24/123, Rajagoud Street, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 Gudavarthi Tatayya S/o. Venkaiah R/o. D.No.5/28, Dantumilli Road, Pedana, Krishna District. 2 V. Ananda Rao S/o. Salman Raju R/o. Ward No.19, Gas Factory Road, Valandapalem, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 3 B. Subba Rao S/o. Venkata Swamy Circaltota, Chilakalapudi, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 4 Md. Ismail S/o. Abbass Ali R/o. D.No.28/874, Jalalpeta, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 5 V. Basavaiah S/o. Kotaiah R/o. D.No.24/123, Rajagoud Street, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 6 The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Guntur, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.E.AJAY REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per Anil R. Dave, CJ) Looking to the facts of the case, the appeal is finally heard today. Upon perusal of the order, we find that in pursuance of the order dated 18-10-2001 the present appellant has already deposited half of the award amount in Fixed Deposit with a nationalized Bank. We do not see any reason to believe that the aforestated order passed by this Court was not complied with. At this juncture, if the respondents-workmen are permitted to withdraw the amount, there are all chances that the appellant-employer may not be in a position to recover the amount from the concerned workman, if ultimately, the appellant-employer succeeds in the petition which is pending before this Court. Looking to the peculiar facts of the case, it is directed that W.P.No.12662 of 2001 be notified for final hearing in the 1st week of August, 2008 so that the same can be finally decided and after the disposal of the petition, the amount which is in deposit with the nationalized bank can be disbursed along with interest accrued thereon. For the aforestated reasons, we quash and set aside the impugned order dated 24-3-2008 passed in W.P.M.P.No. 24988 of 2007. The appeal stands disposed of with no order as to costs. ______________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ _________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J GRR