SBCWP No.5002/01. SBCWP No.5162/01. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R 1) S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5002/2001. Ajeet Kumar Sharma Vs. State and ors. 2) S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5162/2001. Radha Kishan Sharma Vs. State and ors. Date of Order : November 24, 2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Kamlakar Sharma and Smt. Naina Saraf for the petitioners. Shri Hemant Gupta, Additional Government Counsel for the State. **** BY THE COURT :- Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2) In the aforesaid two writ petitions, petitioners have challenged the charge-sheets initiated against them for various irregularities and also the validity of the circular dated 3/9/2001 which provided that the person, who was facing the departmental enquiry on serious charges may not be given field posting. Similar writ petition came up before this court on 18/11/2008, being SBCWP No.5273/01 in which court was informed that validity of this circular along with other circulars dated 10/8/2001 and 13/9/2001 was upheld by the judgment of this court in SBCWP No.4985/2001 (Mahaveer Singh SBCWP No.5002/01. SBCWP No.5162/01. 2 Shekhawat Vs. State of Rajasthan) passed on 29/5/2002 whereby large number of writ petitions were decided. There was no interim-order in so far as all the aforesaid circulars are concerned but so far as challenge to the charge-sheet is concerned, interim order was passed. Departmental enquiry against the petitioner was allowed to be continued. Neither of the learned counsel is in a position to state whether enquiry against the petitioner has been concluded or not. The writ petition remained pending before this court for last more 7 years. 3) Respondents are directed to conclude the departmental enquiry and passed a final order within a period of six months if not already concluded. It goes without saying that if any order is passed adverse to the interest of the petitioners, they would be at liberty to question the same by availing legal remedy against such an order as may be open to them. Writ petitions are accordingly disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil SBCWP No.5002/01. SBCWP No.5162/01. 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL MISC.STAY APPLICATION NO.5088/2001. IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5002/2001. Ajeet Kumar Sharma Vs. State and ors. Date of Order : November 24, 2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Kamlakar Sharma for the applicant-petitioner. Shri Hemant Gupta, Additional Government Counsel for the State. **** Consequent upon disposal of writ petition, this stay application is rejected. The interim-order dated 12/10/2001 is vacated. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil SBCWP No.5002/01. SBCWP No.5162/01. 4 S.B. CIVIL MISC.STAY APPLICATION NO.5262/2001. IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5162/2001. Radha Kishan Sharma Vs. State and ors. Date of Order : November 24, 2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Smt. Naina Saraf for the applicant-petitioner. Shri Hemant Gupta, Additional Government Counsel for the State. **** Consequent upon disposal of writ petition, this stay application is rejected. The interim-order dated 1/11/2001 is vacated. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil