IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 20 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 197 OF 2005 SHRI DATTARAM ATMARAM ....Applicant KANTAK,SUPERVISOR(TBPS) Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF ....Respondents SECRETARY AND ANR., Mr. D. P. Bhise, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. M. S. Joshi, Govt. Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 9th January, 2006 P.C.: Heard. 2. The only grievance of the petitioner is that non-applicability of the decision of this Court in the earlier petition has caused error apparent on the face of the record in the Order delivered on 3rd October, 2005 while it is not being disputed that the petitioner did not fall in the zone of consideration for the purpose of grant of promotion. The Order dated 3rd October, 2005 clearly disclose that the relief for promotion was refused to the petitioner on the ground that he did not fall in the zone of consideration and that being not in dispute, merely because in some other petition the petitioner therein was granted some relief on some other considerations, that cannot be a ground for reviewing the Order dated 3rd October, 2005. 3. There being no error apparent on the face of the record for review of the Order dated 3rd October, 2005, application is rejected. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. sl.