IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5014 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 02.09.2009 Anita Gupta .....Petitioner versus Rajesh Sharma .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Harkesh Manuja, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner impugns the order dated 20.8.2009 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Panipat, apprehending that her application for correction of an alleged typographical mistake in her cross- examination recorded by the Court on 25.3.2009, has been declined. The impugned order reveals that the Rent Controller has observed that there is no necessity to carry out the correction at this stage as it can be made at the appropriate stage. In this view of the matter, this revision petition is disposed of with a clarification that at the time of final hearing of the case and/or otherwise, the petitioner shall be at liberty to make out a case that the C.R. No.5014 of 2009 (O&M) 2 expression 'nagad' mentioned in her cross-examination dated 25.3.2009 as inconsistent with the otherwise consistent stand taken by her throughout. The trial Court shall consider the said plea in accordance with law. Disposed of. Dasti. 02-09-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE