1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1566 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.845 OF 2011 Shivaji Eknath Patil .Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.A.P.Mundargi, Sr.Counsel with Mr.K.J.Patil, for the Applicant Smt.S.V.Sonawane, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 19TH DECEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is second application for bail by an applicant, who had been refused bail in the past. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that while dealing with the previous bail application, this Court had refused bail to the applicant, as he had been named by two 2 witnesses in the incident of 15th September,1998. The learned counsel for the applicant states that PW-14 Ashok Mahadeo Shinde, in fact, named the applicant as participant in some different incident and therefore, it cannot be said that his participation in the incident is indicated by two witnesses. I have once again gone through the copy of deposition of Ashok Shinde. The incident does not appear to be different. 3. Criminal Application is, therefore, rejected. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)