: 1 : WP-1323-11 Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1323 OF 2011 Sandeep Suhas Samant ... Petitioner V/s. The Commissioner of Police, Thane City, Thane & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. S.A. Sawant for the Petitioner. Mr. A.R. Pitale for Respondent No.4. Dr. F.R. Shaikh, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM: V.M. KANADE & A.M. THIPSAY, JJ. DATED : 8 TH SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. The grievance of the Petitioner is that he has received threatening calls from Respondent No.4 on his mobile and several false cases are also filed by Respondent No.4 against the Petitioner before his senior officers, as a result of which, he has been transferred. 3. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the Respondent No.4 does not stay at the address which is mentioned in the : 2 : WP-1323-11 Petition. Dr. Shaikh, the learned APP for the Respondent-State, submits that the Police have made inquiries and it appears that Respondent No.4 does not stay at the said address and that such a person does not exist, and it appears that complaints have been filed under fictitious name by the said Respondent No.4. 4. It is also submitted that the Petitioner has not reported to the Police for the purpose of the inquiry, which is to be conducted against the Respondent No.4. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner shall report to the concerned Police Station as and when called. Dr. Shaikh, the learned APP appearing on behalf of the Respondent-State, submits that the complaint filed by the Petitioner is being inquired into and suitable action would be taken in accordance with law. 5. In view of this, the Writ Petition does not survive and the same is disposed of. 6. Liberty is given to the Petitioner to apply. (A.M. THIPSAY, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)