1 AO 75/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD APEAL FROM ORDER NO. 75 OF 2011 ,With CA/5635/2011 ,In AO/75/2011 DR. RAJKUMAR DAULATRAM SACHDEO AND ORS VERSUS RADHALAXMI HOTEL AND THEATER PVT. THR. ITS 3 DIRECTORS ... Advocate for Appellant: Mr.SC Bora, Adv. h/for Mr.Chapalgaonkar S.G. Mr.AS Bajaj, Adv. For Resp.No.1 ***** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 13th DECEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) Mr.Bajaj, on instructions by Mr.Purushottam Bagdiya, submits, the parties have settled the controversy and it is agreed that Respondent No.1 – Purushottam s/o Radhkisan Bagadiya, would execute sale-deed in respect of the suit property, after getting clearance from ROC within reasonable time. A statement is made on behalf of Respondent No.1 that till receipt of such clearance, they will not alienate the suit property in favour of third party. 3) The appellant, as purchaser, agrees to get the sale-deed executed in terms of agreement of sale including getting clearance from the ROC by Respondent No.1. The appellant confirms and accepts 2 AO 75/2011 that except the impediment of clearance of ROC, there is no other clog in completing the transaction of sale. 4) In the light of above statement by both the learned Counsel, the Appeal from Order with CA disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/