THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.15937 of 2002 ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner represents that the subject matter of the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ___________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J. 24th March, 2009. skmr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 15937 of 2002 Between: K.R. Subramanyam S/o. Subbaiah Setty Near Tadipatri Bus Stand Old Town Ananthapur ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Ananthapur Municipality Rep. by its Commissioner Ananthapur 2 D. Venkateswarlu S/o. Sivaramaiah 21/174 Raja Street Old Town Ananthapur .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the 1st respondent in insisting the petitioner for payment of rents for Shop No. 3, Ananthapur Municipal Complex, Tadipatri Road, Old Town, Ananthapur, without evicting the 2nd respondent from the said shop is arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the 1st respondent not to insist the petitioner for payment of rents for shop No. 3, Ananthapur Municipal Complex, Tadipatri Road, Old Town, Ananthapur, A.P, without evicting the 2nd respondent from the said shop. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.CHANDRAIAH Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following :