c^ ^/- IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR gj^ CONTEMPT CASE N0. ^ ^ of 20l6 Dr.Rajkumar Sautam, S/o Shri Ramprasad Gautam, aged about 65 y'/i^'\y years, Retired Head Master, Middle School Bandhwandand, Sourela, block Pendraraod, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) APPLICANT/ PETITIONER is. -^'A •XP^. . . ^^f P»!fA* V I.S^'~ ^u S v<y^^y' rf'" K's'syjf f 'f BS<Sfsi «tf' RESPON&ENT/ CONTEMNOR Shyamanand Sahu, aged notknown, S/o not known, Block Education Officer, Sourela, Pendra Road, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION UN&ER ARTICLE' 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IN&IA READ WITH SECTION 10. 12 <S 14 CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1971. an^i^i; R-fid) SSt^ sti^i'^ y^a ^°? -><l'i<ld'4, d^ly'ld, fadiyy wwfr wnch_......c^..^f±t.,C^ ^J6fl" ••--•••^ 200 sn^r'RBiw'HfOT SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindrii Mohan Shrivastava. J 12.01.2011 None for the petitioneil, Shri Pankaj Shrivasta'fa |, even in the second round. i, counsel for the respondent. This contempt petit) compliance or order dated ^. (S) No.7164/08, whereby tl-je quashed. This petition has recovery has been quashed,] not been refunded to the pe|itioner Learned counsel for 1 averments made in his repy that after the order was pas^ this Court, has been refuncj has been deposited in Sub- «bi'')fci41-f ^w^S ^ ^S <[»it«;i< ^TSlRgiT 311^1 \on has been Eled alleging non- 1.3.2010 passed by this Court in W.P. recovery against the petitioner was i]been filed stating that even after the Ithe amount which was recovered has the respondent, referring to the and fhe additional affidavit, subniits ed by this Court, the respondent had initiated the process and fijnally, the entire amount which was recovered and in respect of ^vhich, the orders has been passed by ed to the petitioner and fhe amount yreasuiy, Pendra Road vide dispateh No.577 dated 2.12.2010. I\. is submitted that the respondent .never intended to disobey pr flwnfthe order of this Court and sorae time was consum.ed in completing the departmental < formalities, for which he subjmits unconditional apology. l^ "; c^ '<VS^SSii K 'BHC-22 sn^r^i WM 3ni?T sn^i^ yliff Praveen ^53'•^IPfRra, afll^'is, f«(tyll^'J,< sni^T V^K tlllMI %t|iq> •^ 200 I^B^T" Considering the subnd respondent, apology is acce^ Consequently, the rul^ Petition is accordingly ehN^^ ^Hfff '4 IT^ •(.I^K-^K ^? srfigir aii^i issions mad and the affidavit of the ited. is discharged. Einally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ~~!1