IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4669 of 2008 MD.YASIN S/o- Md. Karamat R/o- Village Dharampur P.S. – Sadar District – Muzaffarpur Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Nasima Khatoon D/o- Mahmood Miyan R/o- Village Mohanpur P.S.- Kudhni District - Muzaffarpur ----------- 4. 07.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offences under Section 498 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is of demand of dowry and torture. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready to keep the opposite party no. 2. However, she has not even appeared despite notice. As such it appears that she is not interested to live with this petitioner. Learned counsel for the State Opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is specific allegation against this petitioner in the complaint. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the - 2 - petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)