IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.21372 of 2011 Date of Decision:- November 18, 2011 Mehma Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present: Mr.Mohit Jaggi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Satish Kumar Mittal, J. (Oral) After arguing for some time, when the contention of the learned counsel was drawn towards Clause 3.5 of the Policy dated 25.5.2011, which provides that in case there is a grievance of an oustee, he shall redress his grievance before the Chief Administrator of the Authority, or, thereafter to the Government of Punjab with regard to the interpretation of the Policy, learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the said Clause, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the Chief Administrator of the GMADA for the redressal of his grievance. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE November 18, 2011 (PARAMJEET SINGH) vkg JUDGE