IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23868 of 2009 DILIP RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.8.2009 Heard. The petitioner has remained in custody since 8.8.2003. The case is under Sections 307 etc IPC and 25 etc of the Arms Act. The petitioner appears running away from judicial custody and this could be the reason for this court to refuse his repeated prayer for bail. However, the fact is that in spite of being in custody the charges were framed against the petitioner on 25.7.2007 and in spite of passage of two years of framing of the charges the learned trial Judge could not get a single witness produced before him. The learned A.P.P. was still resisting the prayer for bail vehemently. Considering the above facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Fast Track Court-Vth, Nawadah in S.Tr.No.344 of 2004/125 of 2007(Kawakol(Rupan) P.S.Case No.132 of 2001). B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )