THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOs.1220 AND 1221 OF 2010 COMMON ORDER: Since these two revisions arise out of the same proceedings, they are taken up together for disposal. The petitioner-plaintiff filed two applications in the Court below, one under Order I Rule 10 and Section 151 Rule 28 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 {CPC}, to implead the Sub-Registrar, Guntur, as third defendant in the suit and order for consequential amendment of plaint and another, under Section 151 CPC to direct the Sub-Registrar, Guntur, not to act on any document filed by the defendants for cancellation of the document bearing No.11991/2005. Since both the applications were dismissed, these two revisions are filed. On hearing the submissions made and on perusal of the material available on record, it is clearly seen that both the revisions are filed against the respondents herein and hence, they are not maintainable, as they are of interlocutory in nature. Both the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed with liberty to file an appropriate application against the respondents and the same would be considered on merits. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 19th March 2010 RRB