1 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2093 of 2008 Unitrol Engineering Limited .. Petitioner versus Kulkarni Engineers .. Respondent ... Mr.Shailesh Shah with Ms.Manorama Mohanty i/b S.K. Shrivastava & Co. Advocats for the petitioner. Mr.A. Kulkarni for the respondent. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 6th August 2008 P.C.: 1. After hearing the counsel for the petitioner for some time, counsel in all fairness submits that the correctness of the view taken in the judgement under appeal in the present writ petition can be agitated even in appeal,in the event the suit was to be decided against the petitioner. 2 2. In the circumstances, no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is warranted. All questions arisingfrom the opinion recorded in the impugned judgment are left open to be agitated in appeal against the final decision which will be decided on its own merits. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)