IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 822 OF 2009 IN SUO MOTU WRIT PETITION NO. 2 OF 2007 THE CHIEF OFFICER, CANACONA MUNCIPAL COUNCIL ... Applicant Mr. Sudesh Usgaonkar, Advocate for the applicant. Advocate Ms. Norma Alvares, Amicus Curiae. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. A. Kamat, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondents No.1, 3 to 6. Mr. A. F. Diniz, Corporation of City of Panaji. Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. D. Lawande, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. A. F. Diniz, Advocate for respondent No.7; Mr. S. D. Padiyar, Advocate for resopndent No.8, 9, 12, 16, 17, 19 and 47. Mr. P. Shahapurkar, Advocate for respondents No.20 to 24. Mr. Amit Palekar, Advocate for respondent No.31. Coram:- SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI & R. M. SAVANT, JJ. Date:- 17th December, 2009 P.C. Not on Board. As connected matter is on board, taken up for hearing with the consent of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties and the learned Amicus Curiae. 2. This application has been preferred by respondent No.15 Canacona Municipal Council for extension of time by 4 months. Misc. Civil Application No.953/2009 has also been preferred for extension of time though for one year. In view of the fact that Misc. Civil Application No.953/2009 has been preferred by Canacona Municipal Council, we are of the opinion that Misc. Civil Application No.822/2009 would not survive, hence it is disposed of as such. SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. R. M. SAVANT, J. ssm.