1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 7517 of 2011 Decided on: 14th September, 2011. Gauri Parsad .......Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another .......Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner claims benefit of adhoc and tenure service rendered by him. It is seen that some period is as J.B.T teacher and some period is as Language Teacher. As far as J.B.T. is concerned, that period will count only for the purpose of pension as per Rule 13 of the Pension Rules. As far as the adhoc/tenure period in the post of Language Teacher is concerned, in case the same is 2 followed by regular appointment, that period shall be counted for the purpose of increments and pension, in view of the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State of H.P. The needful shall be done within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 2. The writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 14th September, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/hl) Judge.