1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED ThIS THE 11Th DAY QF FEBRUARY 2011 I3EFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER PETITION NOs,64378 2010 64379 2010 6’204410 20 1.0 AND 41i 010 LRESJ BETWEEN: Sri. 0, Ramachandrappa s/o. Sri. 0. Nagappa aged about 40 years (Petitioner in W.P. No. 64378’ 2010) 2. Sri. 0. Venugopala 5/0. Sri, 0. Nagappa aged about 38 years (Petitioner in W.P. No, 64379/2010 3. Sri. P,C, Veera Reddy s/o. late Sri, Pampa Reddy aged about. 67 years (Tetitioner in W,P. No, 64386/ 4 5 A. Ye...rriswam.y s/o. late Sri, Agasara Rudrappa aged about 40 ears (Petitioner in Sri. Mallikarjuna 5/ o. late hn. Agasara Rudrappa aged about 55 years (Petitioner in W.P. No. 64411/2.012) Th.e petitioners are. the: Ri o. Chaganuru village. Moka Hobli Bellarv Taluk and District (By Sri. C. Mallikarjuna Reddv, Adv.) AND: The State of Karnataka Rep. By the Chief Secretary Vidhana Soudha Dr. Ambedkar Veedhi Bangalore - 560 001 2. The Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board No. 14/3, 2 Floor Nrupathunga Road Bangalore - 560 001 Rep. By its Chief Kxeeutive Me.mber The Land Accuisition Officer i he rarnataiea i neustrint 1 nrna. ue’veloprner&t bourn. Dharwar 4. The Deput.y Commissioner Beliar District, Bellar 583 101 3. UflO€ir Sn retarv the Government .it C) M S. Building Dr. Ambedkar\ 7 eedhi Bangalore — 560 00 1 ft The Principal Secretary Infrastructure Development Department Vikas Soudha Dr. Amb;edkar Veedhi Bangalore - 560 001 7. The Airports Authority of India Rep. By its Chairman Rajiv Gandhi Bhavan Safdarjung Air Port New Delhi - 110 003 S. The Ministry of Aviation Government of India Rtjiv Gandhi Bhavan Safdarjnng Air Port New Delhi 110 003 RESPONDENTS B\ mt K Vidvavati,AGAforRft 4 5 ando SPi.Mahesh Wodevar, Adv, for R-2. and R3 Ry A T Saanui Adv for P 7 - a P-S Sri. Mruthvunjav Tata Bangi, CGSC. for I?-? and P-Si These writ oetihuns arc. tiled ijnder ArticI.Cs 226 and r —s 1K noulicauon and c te. r 1 .- )-f -‘c :r1t Court: nradc the following: 4 4- ORDER The petitioners have filed a memo through their learned Counsel Sri Veerashekar stating that they do not press the writ petitions in so far as their claim is concerned. Sri. Veerashekar, learned Counsel, has identified the above petitioners, who are present before Court. Sri. Mallikarjuna Reddy, learned Counsel, who had filed writ petitions on their behalf, has no objection for Sri. Veerashekar, learned Counsel, to file the memo on their behalf. 2. The memo is placed on record. The writ petitions are dismissed as not pressed in so far as the petitioners are concerned. No costs. Sd! JUDGE Cs