IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10440 of 2008 NAGENDRA SINGH son of Late Chandeshwar Singh, resident of Village Bangaen P.S.Bajapatti District Sitamarhi. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.Addl.Member Board of Revenue,Bihar, Patna 3.Addl. Collector (Ceiling)Sitamarhi. 4.Deputy Collector Land Reforms,Pupri,Sitamarhi 5.Ram Swarath Raut son of Late Puran Raut 6.Dharmendra Singh son of ----------- 3 4.5.2009 This application has been filed by the petitioner, during the pendency of his revision application before the Additional Member Board of Reveuue. The petitioner has preferred Revision no.83 of 2006 against the order passed by the Additional Collector, Ceiling Sitamarhi in Appeal no.1 of 2005-06. During the pendency of the revision application this writ application has been filed stating that though the revision was filed in the year 2006 till date it has not been disposed of/decided. This cannot be a reason for entertaining the writ application specially when the revision application os subjudice before the appropriate forum. The revisional authority will consider and decided the revision application of the petitioner on merit preferably within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. This application is disposed off. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J)