IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN TUESDAY, THE 26TH JULY 2011 / 4TH SRAVANA 1933 CRL.A.No. 1924 of 2007() ------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN CRLP.778/2007 Dated 19/09/2007 CC.152/1999 of CHIEF JUDITIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, THALASSERY .................... APPELLANT(S): COMPLAINANT: -------------------------- P.K. MANOJ KUMAR, S/O. UTHAMAN, AGED 40 YEARS, BUSINESS, RESIDING AT CHALIL HOUSE, NADAL, P.O. EDAKKAD, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.SURENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): ACCUSED & STATE: ------------------------------- 1. K. MANOJ KUMAR, S/O. KARUNAKARAN, AGED 33 YEARS, BUSINESS, RESIDING AT KUNNUMMAL HOUSE, ANJARAKKANDY, P.O. MAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.B.JAYASREE THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.K.MOHANAN,J ------------------------------ Crl. Appeal No.1924 of 2007 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT Though this Court by order dated, 16.10.2007 admitted the appeal on condition of paying Rs.1,000/- to the Legal Services Committee of the High Court within one month from 16.10.2007 and also there was a direction to produce the receipt showing the payment and on producing such receipt to sent notice to the other respondents. But the Registry is reported that so far the amount is not deposited and no receipt is produced. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though he had informed the party concerned in writing, there was no response from him and as such there is no instruction. From the above conduct of the petitioner/appellant, it can be seen that he is not interested in prosecuting the matter. In the result, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE. pm/