IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 30TH AUGUST 2010 / 8TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 32399 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- E.M.JANHARLAL AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.E.J.MANOHARLAL, RESIDING AT 6/635, EAST END, 3RD RAILWAY FLY OVER KOZHIKODE 673001. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.SUDHEER SRI.V.C.MADHAVANKUTTY RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O.,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O.,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE PRINCIPAL MES COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, KUTTIPPURAM, THRIKKANAPURAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, CALICUT UTY. FOR R1,2 SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH FOR R3 SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU FOR R3 SRI.P.G.PRAMOD FOR R3 SRI.KANDAMPULLY RAHUL FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.32399/08 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 4.9.2003 IN WRIT APPEAL NO.2463/2002. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR PROVISIONAL DEGREE CERTIFICATE DT 6.10.2008. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM IN WA 2463/2002 ON THE FILE OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DT 30.10.2008 FOR GETTING ORIGINAL DEGREE CERTIFICATE SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4(a): TRUE COPY OF THE CHALLAN RECEIPT DT 30.10.2008 ISSUED BY UNIVERSITY. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 32399 OF 2008 (F) ===================== Dated this the 30th day of August, 2010 J U D G M E N T The controversy between the petitioner and the University started with the admission of the petitioner for B.Tech Course resulting in Ext.P1 judgment. On the basis of Ext.P1 judgment, petitioner was admitted to B.Tech Course. He completed his studies and has successfully completed the course also way back in 2006. Pursuant to the subsequent orders that were passed, petitioner has also been issued a provisional degree certificate and all that remains is that the University should issue the final degree certificate to the petitioner. In view of this, by order dated 19/8/2010, standing counsel for the University was directed to obtain instructions and report to this Court within what time the said certificate can be issued. 2. On instructions, counsel submits that it is the Senate, which has to confer the Degree and that within two months, the said process will be completed. In my view, the two months period sought for by the University cannot be said to be unreasonable, and therefore, recording the aforesaid submission WPC No. 32399/08 :2 : made by the standing counsel for the University and directing that the final degree certificate of the petitioner shall be issued to him within two months from today, this writ petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp