ii JL. ^-F 'le?7^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G) W.P.fSlNO. 3^>£2- /2011 PETITIONER ^A <w^-^ .r.jj^.l.- ^:..-- ^^^y^ ^ ^ <^" ManmohanKaushik, aged about 48 years, S/o Shri Dallu Ram Kaushik, Upper Division Teacher, Government Higher Secondary School Sirgitti, Block Bilha, Distt. Bilaspur(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ;1. ^ 4. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Bilaspur (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block Bilha, Distt.Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA ^S!^9^^^ HIGH COURT OP CHHATT180ARH ATBXLASIPUR SB : HON'BLB MR. JVSTICE PRITWKER DIWAKSR PETITION^R RBSPONDBNTS W.P.tSl.NO. 3862/2011 Manmohaii Kaushik yersus gtate of C.Q, & Others l"»i«aNt Shri K.S.Pawar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Praveen Das, Dy. G. A. for the State. WRIT PBTITION UNDBRARTICLE 226 OF THB CON8TITOTION €% INDIA ORDBR (20.07.2011) By this petition, the petitioner has pfayed for a directioo to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and provide beaellt <lf FR 22 (D) of the Chhattisgarh Fundamental RuleSy for grant of increments aa provided under the rules and also to pay arrears fram the date when it became due. At the very outset^ counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the identical matter has already been considered and deoided by this Court vide order dated 27.3.2008 in W.P.(S) No. 4991/2006 and the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the said decision. Counsel appearing for the State doea not dispute that the caBe of the petitioner is squarety covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 4991/2006. He further submits that if the petitioner fries fresh representation before the concemed authorifcies for the reliefs, whioh he has claimed by way of this petition^ the same shall be considered and decid^l in accordance with law, subject to verification of facts. For the foregoing reasons^ the instant petition ia disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation before the respondent authorities raising all his grievances raised in this petition and « cn such representation being made^ the reepondent authorities Bhall consider and decide the same !n accordance with law on its own merits, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. Sd/- pritinkerDiwaker Judge