IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARFATAKA AT BMALORE DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OW JUNE 1998 BEFORE THE HON’SLE MR,JUSTICE H,L.DATTU WRIT PETITION NO.6382 OF 1993. BETWEEN: Venkatapura Aroqya Samiti by its Health Committee Member Sri G.Govindappa 9/0 Gudlingappa, aged about 39 years, Verikatapura Mandal, Pavagada taluk, Tumkur District, . • Petitioner (By Sri Vigneshwar S Snastri for Petitioner) 1. The State of Karnat ka represented by its Secretary to Health and Family Welfare Department, M, S. Building, Bangalore. 2, The Director of Health and Family Welfare, DepQrtment in Karnataka, Anandarao Circle, Bangalore—9, 3. The District Health and Family Welfare Officer, Tumkur, a a_a 4 /2/ 4, The Zilla Parishat, Tumkur by its Chief Secretary. . . Respondents (By Sri S.Udayashankar ASA for R—1, Sri V.Sreedhar for R—2) Writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with an affidavit, praying to quash the endorsement dt • 26.12.92 vide Annexure J and etc., This writ petition is coming on for hearing this day, the Court made the following :0 R D E R: Petitioner is an association, It is questioning in this writ petition the endorsement issued by the Chief Secretary, 3i1la Parishad, Tumkur, dated 26,12,1992, By the said endorsement the Chief Secretary had informed the office bearers of the /3/ petitioner association that they cannot regularise the services of Group D employees of the petitioner association. Petitioners contend before this Court that the association had donated a sum of Rs.SO,000/— towards construction of a hospital in Venkatapura Mandal Panchayat, Pavagada taluk. It is their further case before this Court that they had appointed some persons as Group D employees. The association had also fixed the salary of .lSO/—p,m. Persons who were appointed by the association as Group I) employees had gone before the Chief Secretary, Jilla Parishad, Tuthkur, requesting him to regularise their services through the association. That request had been rejected by the Chief Secretary on the /4/ ground that since the appointment was not done by the Jilla Parishad they cannot regularise their services. In my view this Court cannot take exception to the endorsement issued by the Chief Secretary for the reason that the Jilla Parishad at no point of time had appointed the merrers of the petitioner associations Group D employees. If for any reason the appointment is done by the association, petitioners have to approach the asso ciation only for regularisation of their services and they cannot approach the jilla parishad for regularisation of their services just because the association had donated a sum of Rs. Rs. 50, 000/— for construction of hospital building, /5/ For the reasons stated I do not find any good grounds to interfere with the endorsenerit issued by the respondents. Accordingly petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. In the facts and circumstances of the case parties are directed to bear their own costs. Ordered accordingly sal- JUDGE. Mc! r, by c. by csiStBflt R,giS’ ,- auRa10t 5 ó° jqI( a - a