IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.2148 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 19, 2011 Hukam Rai ...Petitioner Versus Makhan Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner was given opportunity to discharge the liability. Counsel submits that the petitioner is in no position to discharge the liability. I have perused the impugned judgment, whereby the petitioner has been convicted and sentence imposed. I do not see any reason to interfere in the impugned judgment. The conviction of the petitioner is based on evidence which is reliable. Otherwise also, no submissions are made on merits. The only prayer made is for reducing the sentence. Since the petitioner is not ready to discharge the liability, no case for leniency is made out. Dismissed. October 19, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE