IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.210 of 2010 1. CHANDRADEEP PRASAD 2. BAHADUR PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR Cr.Misc.No.1333 of 2010 RUDAL RAUT VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.1.2010 Both the aforesaid cases have taken up together because they arise out of the one occurrence which led to a case registered under sections 147,148,149,323,325,307 and 385 of the I.P.C. The informant, Balo Raut, had given a written report to the police that these petitioners had come with iron rod and on their behest initial blow was given by Kapil Sardar causing fracture injury on the hand of the informant from the butt of the rifle and rod. Submission is that there was no intention to cause death so section 307 of the I.P.C. is not made out. There is case and counter case. All injuries caused by hard and blunt substance are not on vital part of the body. Learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer for bail of the informants and submits that these petitioners have criminal background and they have assaulted the informant in order to kill him. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case the aforesaid petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M. , Nawada, in Warisaliganj 2 P.S. Case No.172/09. AnilKr.Sinha ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)