IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40407 of 2010 Vivek Kumar Versus State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- with Criminal Miscellaneous No.41657 of 2010 Gullu Ram Versus State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 12. 09.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. One thousand (1000) liters and eight hundred (800) liters of kerosene oil is shown recovered from petitioners’ house. For petitioner of Cr. Misc. No.40407 of 2010, submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that recovery is from the house of one Vivek Paswan, S/O Dukhi Paswan and present petitioner is Vivek Kumar, S/O Sarjug Prasad Ram not the same person. In the discussed circumstance, I am not of the opinion to allow the bail petition of petitioner of Cr. Misc. No.41657 of 2010, hence rejected. Sofar as the anticipatory bail application of petitioner of Cr. Misc. No.40407 of 2010 is concerned, he is allowed anticipatory bail only after verifying that petitioner is not Vivek Paswan, S/O Dukhi Paswan. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner of Cr. Misc. No.40407 of 2010 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction 2 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda in connection with Silao P. S. Case No.144 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)