C.W.P No. 4 OF 2008. ****** Satish Goel vs The State of Haryana and others Present : Mr. Vikrant Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG Haryana for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. J.P.Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.5. ******* Counsel for the petitioner states that even though the respondents have promoted the petitioner yet they have not given him the promotion from the due date. In the circumstances, counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to agitate that part of his claim. Allowed as prayed for. Dismissed as withdrawn. ( AJAY TEWARI ) March 06, 2009. JUDGE `kk'