CTlCi"^^&- 1.0 6 (^.,-<)"i- '"'s^ O'.i'! K, K BS^^ n'^ da'.6; (^-1^/ $ IN THE mOH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH AT BILASPUR WP^C: Ufil^ /2009 PETITIONER (L Ku Shweta Yadav D/o Shri Shrinarayan Yadav Age 22 years, R/o viUage Bisunpura PO Chainpur Gallaura, District Balia UP VERSUS RESPONDENTS / 1. State ofChhattisgarh Through Secretary, Departmeat ofHigher Education Mantralaya, D K S Bhawan, Raipur CG Professional Exanunation Board CVYAPAM) Through ControUer, C/168, Tagore Nagar, Raipur CO Centre Siqwrintendent, Shri Shaiikaracharya Mahavidyalaya Sector-VI,BhilaiCG WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WMT DM THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROIDBmON. CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTSERDIRECTION OR ORDBR TO DO XJSTICE IN THEMArTER ,,,,|)IUIS !.»n<hJ-*T., !t A ^l ''i:;SJ "8SBtB H1GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PET1TION (C\ No. 4618 of2009 PET1TIONER : Ku. Shweta Yadav. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisearh & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITTO'ION QF MDIA SB: Hoa'Me Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: ^•i Shri Saleem Kazi, Advocate forthe petitoiner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri Pankaj AGrawal, Advocate forthe respondent No. 2. Shri C.K.Sahu, Advocate for the respondent No. 3. nit (Passed on 13'" day of September, 2010) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly suhmits that facts and question of law involved in this petition are squarely covered by order dated 25.08.2009, passed by the leamed Divisioa Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No. 253/2009 {Professional Examination Board (!/YPAM) v. Smt. Manj'u Devi & Others}. In view of the same, nothing survives for adjudication and this petition may be dismissed accordingly. Leamed counsel appearing for the other side do not controvert the above submission. It is ordered accordiiigly. Consequently, tfae ^wit petition is dismissed in terms ofthe order passed by leamed Division Bench in Smt. Manfu Devi (supra). /Sd/-_ _^^ Satisb ls\i "^: judge