IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THIS THE 4th DAY OF MARCH, 2010 CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.430 of 2010 Between: Satish Kumar Bhosele ….PETITIONER(S) a n d Smt. Kavitha and another ….RESPONDENT(S) THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.430 of 2010 ORDER: This revision case is directed against the order passed in M.P.No.1080 of 2008 in M.C.No.139 of 2003 dated 04.01.2010 by the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the trial of the Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Case cum Additional Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad, whereby and whereunder the maintenance granted earlier in M.C.No.139 of 2003 was enhanced from Rs.1,000/- to Rs.4,000/-. 2. Heard. 3. The learned counsel for petitioner contends that though a reading of the impugned order would not reveal that it is not an ex parte order, it is an ex parte order. 4. As seen from the impugned order, there is no evidence with regard to the present income of the petitioner which alone can be a ground for enhancement of the maintenance already granted. In these circumstances, the revision case can be disposed of without notice to the 1st respondent, as issuing notice to her may not be of much help and, on the other hand, it might cause inconvenience to her as she has to make appearance before this Court by spending money and time. 5. The Criminal Revision Case is, therefore, allowed at the stage of admission and the M.P.No.1080 of 2008 in M.C.No.139 of 2003 is remanded to the trial Court for disposal afresh which shall be on the basis of evidence. However, until fresh disposal of the M.P.No.1080 of 2008, the petitioner shall pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees two thousand only) per month to the 1st respondent i.e. the petitioner has to pay Rs.1,000/- in addition to Rs.1,000/- he has already been paying. ________________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J 4th March 2010 CVRK