THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.3939 of 2011 Dated 23rd September, 2011 Between: Paduri Satyanarayana Reddy and others …Petitioners And Md.Yousuf Khan and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty Counsel for respondents: --- The Court made the following: ORDER: This civil revision petition arises out of the notice issued by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Nalgonda in I.A.No.1000 of 2011 in I.A.No.293 of 2010 in O.S.No.57 of 2009. The petitioners are third parties to the suit filed by respondent No.1. In the suit, respondent No.1 filed I.A.No.293 of 2010 seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for measuring the suit schedule land and fixing the boundaries. On coming to know about the order in the said I.A., the petitioners filed an application for their impleadment in the suit as defendant Nos.3 to 5 and also I.A.No.1000 of 2011 seeking stay of operation of the said order pending application filed for recalling the said order. The Court below has issued notice in the said application. Feeling aggrieved by the said notice, the petitioners filed the present civil revision petition. After hearing Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, learned counsel for the petitioners, and perusing the record, I am of the opinion that the very CRP itself filed against a notice cannot be entertained. No order has been passed by the lower Court to examine the correctness or otherwise of such an order. Ordinarily, a notice cannot be treated as an order and in the absence of an order, a party cannot be said to have been aggrieved. Moreover, even if the order in I.A.No.293 of 2010 appointing the Advocate Commissioner is given effect to, at best survey would be conducted and boundaries would be demarcated. It is not as if by such an act, any injury will be caused to the petitioners which cannot be repaired. In this view of the matter, I do not find any reason to entertain this civil revision petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the civil revision petition, C.R.P.M.P.No.5637 of 2011 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 23rd September, 2011 VGB