.{1}. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2098 OF 2007 Smt.Nirmala Widow of Thakurdas Lilwani. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents. .. Mr.Dhirendra S. Gautam, Adv. h/f. J.S.Chandnani, Adv. for the Petitioner. Ms.S.M.Dandekar, AGP, for the Respondents-State. .. CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 06, 2008. DATED : FEBRUARY 06, 2008. DATED : FEBRUARY 06, 2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard both sides. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the grievance of the petitioner can be redressed if the directions are given to the respondent No.2 to decide the Revision Application No.26 of 2007 in accordance with law within a stipulated period. The learned AGP states that within a period of two weeks the Revision will be decided. This statement is accepted. Therefore, we direct the respondent .{2}. No.2-Authorised Chief Settlement Commissioner, Maharashtra State, Mumbai to decide the Revision Application No.26 of 2007 in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from today. He is further directed to decide the Revision after giving hearing to the petitioner and/or other concerned and shall dispose of the said Revision by passing an appropriate reasoned orders dealing with the points raised by the petitioner and other parties. Such decision in the Revision shall be communicated to the petitioner by Registered Post Acknowledgment Due (RPAD). 3. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.]