IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43463 of 2009 JHUNNA MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIAHR ----------- 2/ 04.12.2009 Heard. During routine vehicle checks, the petitioner was found driving a Hero Honda motorcycle and in the process, from the dickey, arms and ammunitions along with cell phone, as per description of the same in the FIR as also in the seizure memo, were recovered. The motorcycle and the recovered articles were seized. This is how the petitioner finds himself in custody. The plea of the petitioner is that in fact the police personnel wanted some gratification from the petitioner which was not paid by him and, as such, he was arrested illegally and forwarded in this case. There does not appear any reasonable ground for accepting the defence at this stage of the proceedings, specially when a copy of the seizure memo was handed over to the petitioner. It is true that the petitioner does not bear any antecedent. Considering the factum of recovery of effective arms, the prayer of the petitioner for bail is dismissed with a direction that in case of the trial not being concluded within a period of one year from the date of remand of the petitioner in the case, the court below shall release him on bail on execution of a bond to its own satisfaction. Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)