1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NOS. 4126/2009, 4127/2009 and 4128/2009 M/s Manojkumar Constructions Company through its Partner Shri Mukeshkumar s/o Shri Ramkaran Singh, age 24 yrs, occ. Business, R/o N-2, Vitthal Nagar, CIDCO, Aurangabad. ..Petitioner. (Orig. resp No. 1. ) V E R S U S 1. The Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation, Through its Executive Engineer, Lower Dudhana Project Division, Sailu, Dist. Parbhani. 2. Shri D.S. Waghmare, Retired Superintending Engineer, Near Chelipura High School, Station Road, Aurangabad. ..Respondents. Shri J.N. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri S.S.Thombre Advocate for the respondent – 1. CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2009. PER COURT :- 1. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and for respondent No. 1. Though the respondent No.2 is served, none appeared on behalf of him when the matter is called out. 2 2- This Court by an order dated 06.07.2009 (Justice B. R. Gavai) issued notice for final disposal. 3- Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent matter is taken on board for final hearing. 4- The petitioner /original respondent No.1 by this petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenges the order dated 01.04.2009, passed by Principal District and Sessions Judge, Beed on the petitioners application permitting him to produce additional documents which were already produced before Sole Arbitrator i.e respondent No.2 in the present petition. Said application was rejected by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Beed on the ground that the application for production of documents is made after arguments are over. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, the respondent No.2 who is sole Arbitrator in the present case is directed to produce the entire record and proceedings of Arbitration cases before Principal District & Sessions Judge, Beed within two weeks from the date of communication of this order by the petitioner. With this direction, all these three petitions are disposed off. Parties to act upon on authenticated copy of the order. 5- In view of the order passed in writ petitions, nothing survives in the civil applications hence pending civil applications stand disposed off. ( K. K. TATED ) JUDGE. aaa/4126.09 ****