^ ^f>^L:I.SW& (>R. >—-^S^^ preswtG^^-i^"^;.^...,........-; IN THE HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. : • A^'^ ;6fc Petitioner : Qurrat-ul-ain D/o M.A. Haflef/,, " Rtd. Principal, aged abouf 48 yciii i, Lower Division Teacher, J.R. Dniil girls H.S. Schbol, Resident of'l l.^-o. 8/190 behind Maszid, Chhota piiiii, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Respondents : (l)StateofChhattisgarh Through ^ The Secretary, School Education Department, DKS, Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) Director ofPublic Instructions, Slalr of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) (3) Joint Director ofEducation Distfirl / Raipur (C.G.) (4) Deputy Director, Education, Raipur district, Raipur C.G. (5) Principal, J.R. Dani Girls H.S. Sclitiiii, Raipur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INI) [A FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WIUTS AND DIRECTIONS, ORDEIIS IN THE NATURE OF MANIMMUS AND CERTIORARIS. XI-HC-78 sn^T^rf^iT?; craTBIR^TsbXlti ^J tTTH^I Sh*ll'ch 3ST "MI^M'i), ^•tfly'Ko, fiitiyy .^.?/.^^ 200^ C.O.T' ^ • 3TT^?Tira^ (ipfgg^T) STBraTdfersn^T 1-9-2006 Mr. Manoj Kumar Dube, Mr. Vinay Pandey, Pane counsel for the petitioner. Lawyer for the State/respondents, on advance copy. Heard. The case of the petitic^ner is thot she is working as Assistant Teacher and os per the Instruction d^ted 24-12-98 issued by the State of M.P., the Assistant Teochers who have their owh expenses after 22- The petitioner passed the B.1 copy of the mark sheet to tha not been given the benefit, 9r'onted two advance incremei Court. and circumstances of the case the cose, the petitioner is allou a copy of this petition and No.2 is directed to examine averments made by the p^ representation also. If resj incr'ements and the petitioner' increments on the basis of Sov' «hl'i|Icl'ifl-fMI^'-ft'ffte^t<Rl«K ^3Tf^T3n^T passed B.T.1., B.Ed. and M.Ed. examination on 10-64 ore entitled for two advance increments. .1. examination on her own cost in 1991-92 and effect is Annexure P-2, but the petitioner has whereas, similar-ly situated persons hwe been its under- the orders of the Tribunal <md this Havin9 heard leiyned co^insel for the parties, having regard to the facts without expressing any opinion on the merit of ed to make a detailed representation along with its annexures raisin9 all her grievances to respondent No.2l«ithina perio(i of 15 days from todcy and in turn,respondent 'he case of the petitioner in the light of the [titioner in this writ petition and in the k)ndent No.2 reaches to the conclusion that similar-ly situated persons h{ive been gremted benefit of two advance case is also covered for grant of two advance rnment's order, then respondent No.2 shall pass P.T.O. K XI-HC-78 Sn^TqiTR-fish (raT3n^Tshxi°h ioma HIHdl sb+lich 3^';5TFt1?ra', »Ti1<rt'l<»,(slifliuy u.p^ • ^ 200 Sfi^i ^ach ('i^t^1*,^) STBTSiRHfeg'W^T -2_- rf trfe order- on the r'epresentdtion of the date of its receipt, in accord4nce With the directions Parties are entitled for cel'tified afore^aid tii«Fci<fl-f.ii*idTff fscS <Ri<^;i< ^;a:rf^T3n^r petitioner Bfithin a period of 3 months from with law. id, the petition stands disposed of. copy of this order. L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O. ^ *;