THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.15682 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondents 1 to 7 in considering his representations dated 14.06.2008 and 17.01.2009, as illegal and violative of the Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India. 2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that he is absolute owner of the property, admeasuring 1000 sq. yards, having purchased the same from Smt. Abburi Bala Saraswathi and two others, by way of a registered sale deed, dated 07.01.2005. When one Smt. P.Sunanda, at the instance of respondents 17 and 18, tried to interfere with his possession of the property, he filed a suit in O.S.No.1310 of 2005 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, R.R. District seeking perpetual injunction and the said suit was decreed in his favour on 16.10.2006. Having failed in their attempt, respondents 17 and 18 got filed another suit in O.S.No.138 of 2008 on the file of the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Malkajgiri, against him, through some others, and the said suit also was dismissed on 15.04.2009. Subsequently, as two persons namely Md. Aijaz Khan and K. Venu Madhav came to the petitioner and asked him to vacate the property stating that they had purchased the property from one Smt. T.Mangamma, the petitioner has given a complaint to the Addl. Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad - 2nd respondent on 14.06.2008, but neither any action is taken nor a case is registered against them. Therefore, he approached this Court and filed the present writ petition. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Home. 4. Having considered the submissions made by both the learned counsel, this Court is of the view that the entire transaction appears to be civil in nature. However, a duty is cast upon the official respondents herein to look into the representations of the petitioner dated 14.06.2008 and 17.01.2009 and pass necessary orders thereon. According to the petitioner, though he complained against the unofficial respondents, the official respondents have not initiated any action against them so far. As the representations of the petitiioner are very much pending with the official respondents, this Court is of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to the official respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner and pass necessary orders, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As this writ petition is being disposed of, without notice to the unofficial respondents, the official respondents, before enquiring into the representations of the petitioner, may put the unofficial respondents on notice, so that they can ventilate their grievance. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 4th August, 2009 CBS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.15682 of 2009 (Disposed of) 4th August, 2009 CBS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.15682 of 2009 DATE:04.08.2009 Between: Punna Mohan .... Petitioner and Commissioner of Police, City Commissionerate, Hyderabad and others ... Respondents