HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 6444 0f2008 : Karim Khan Age about 45 years S/o Shri Safur Khan R/o‘Risaipara, Dhamtari Distt. — Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS PETITIONER RESPONDENT : Regional Transport Authority, Through r; Secretary, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Distt. — Raipur (C.G.) W WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present: ‘ Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Payasi, Panel Lawyer for the State/resden pont 9m d of embe 208) (Passed on 1 ay Novr, 0 With the consent of the parts, the matter is take for earing finall. ie n up h y I ‘ Learned ounsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, ubmits that the petitioner does not want to contes this petition on merits at this stae. Howeer, the respondent -authorities ay be directed to considr an decir his pendin application dated 25.7.2008 (Annexure P/I) i accordance with law, on its own merits, as exeditious as possible. Shri Bhaskar Payasi, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent submits that there is no reason asto why the representation ofthe petitior, a stated abov should not be csidered expeditiously. Shri Payasi submit tha the above- stated reesentation shall be considered and decided b he oncerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, withi a period of on week from the date ofreceipt of a cp fthis order. I I n View of the clear statement made by learned counsel appearing forvthe espondents, accordin to learned consel appearing for the etitioner thing r g u p, no remains t be ajudicated. Aingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto cost ccord s. dl- Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge ORAL ORDER c s t g v m e d de g n ply ne s e on s t pr y t c n e oy o o d /. V S