IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22116 of 2007 Between: Ashok Raj … Petitioner AND The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Alwal Division, Cyberabad, Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : None This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22116 of 2007 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ of Mandamus, any other appropriate order or direction declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not providing the police protection for safeguarding the interests and possession of the petitioner over land in Sy.No.198 (part) situate at Yapral village, Malkajgiri (M) as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14, 19 (1)(g), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 herein to grant police protection to the petitioner for safeguarding the interests and possession of the petitioner over land in Sy.No.198 (part) situate at Yapral village, Malkajgiri Mandal and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed in default. However, since the averments in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition show that the petitioner made representations dated 02.05.2006 and 09.10.2007 to respondent Nos.1 and 2 for taking appropriate steps for protecting his property in terms of judgment and decree dated 14.09.2006 in O.S.No.1515 of 2002, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to dispose of the said representations in accordance with law. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.28668 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 21.04.2008 ES