IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3867 of 2010 DEOMUNI PRASAD, SON OF LATE MOHAN SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NASRIGANJ-DHUS, P.S. NASRIGANJ, DISTRICT ROHTAS AT SASARAM. – PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. SRI ANJANI KUMAR, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. SRI ANUPAM KUMAR, THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ROHTAS AT SASARAM 4. SRI ANJANI KUMAR, THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (HAZARAT) ROHTAS AT SASARAM 5. SRI RAJESH KUMAR, THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VIKRAMGANJ, ROHTAS 6. SRI HEMANT KUMAR, THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, NASRIGANJ, ROHTAS. ------ CONTEMNORS/OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 3 5.1.2011 The order dated 13.5.2010 has been complied with inasmuch the petitioner has been paid Rs. 1,52,186/- vide Cheque No. “132443” dated 26.11.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the calculation has not been made correctly by the concerned authority. The petitioner would be at liberty to give the correct calculation to the concerned authority which should be considered and if the concerned authority finds that there has been some mistake in calculating the date and dues of the petitioner, the sum should be paid as expeditiously as possible. Counsel for the petitioner submits that after the payment of the daily wages, the concerned authority has removed him from the post of daily wages vide Annexure-4 on 21.11.2010. This Court cannot pass any order in the contempt application with respect to Annexure-4. This application is, thus, dismissed. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)