IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.482 of 2009 KANWAR SAYEED @ QAMAR SAYED, S/o late Sayeed Akhtar Versus The STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH VIGILANCE ----------- 2/ 26.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has no concern with the loan which was advanced. He can be said only an agent or mediator, whose work was to count the amount. It was the co-accused namely, Nausad Alam, who has been specifically alleged for making the demand and lastly, trapped amount was reached to him. For that, petitioner is in custody since 19.11.2008. Taking that into consideration, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Vigilance-II at Patna in Spl. Case no. 32 of 2008 arising out of Vigilance Case no. 95/2008. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)