<^i^^7 ~7 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGAMI AT BILASPUR W.P.IS1NO. ~56^) /2010(S.B.) PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1«\..-•"\^° ^s&s^- ..••"Qft.'^ ^^s^ .-^^" I.S. Chandel S/o Late Shri L.S. Chandel, aged about 62 years, R/0- C/23, Songanga Colony, Seepat Road Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1, State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, Health Departnent, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. '. The Chief Medical and Hsalth Officer, Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.). 3. The Accountant Ge:ieral Chhatisgarh, Pandari, Raipur (C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -HC—78 STT^ W K.-S^i •(Wt3^g?EiN? ^ST "a|<41C1<1, ®fl1<-l'|!o,fs|^iyl|< __^i...f^..^:..?.^l.l.o. ,.s... 31I^?I'q^?i' (' qroferahTv^t '&'fyS <fa^i< SB^: Hon'ble Shri Manjndra Mohah Shrivastava,.!. 22-07-M10 Shri Rajkumar Gupta with| petitioner. Ms, Sangeeta Mishra, No.1 & 2 on advance copy. Shri Kashif Shakeel, Standin^ With the consent of learned | heard finally. This case pertains to Learned counsel appearing for the the matter may be referred to the R^ This Court, in the matter o1j Vs. The State of Chhatti^arh & direoted the Committee to consider tK question of facts were involved. Th| State Government, pursuant to th6( W.P.No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chhattisgarh and others), and ord^r No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgaf another). Thus, this petition is squar^ly dated 31 January, 2008 passed inj (supra) as submitted by learned coun^el This petition is accordingly office of the Advocate General is[ Committee, within a period of 15 day^ Shri R. R. Soni, counsel for the Pan^l Lawyer for the State/respondents counsel for respondent No.3. jcounset for the parties, the petition is gri^ance of non-grant of retirat dues. t>etitioner, on instructions, submits that i^tiral Dues Committee. W.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal (fhers) and other connected mattere, matter of retrial dues as the disputed Committee was constituted by the order dated 19-06-2006 passed in ;handrakar Vs. State Govemment of dated 13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. fh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandaland oovered by the judgment and order W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal appearing for the parties, c|isposed of in the same terms i.e., the directed to send the case to the from the date of reoeipt of a copy of ^""s^.'•^. ~ 1 .,'y ..-^•y '3^';?nqic^T,'5TITCR3, fslcfl^y _...^^^.l^^ sr^? '^v (i?^'^) 3iI^B ^il !<-li* SH^T sb*ii^i Tumane pei)iod this order. Thereafter, the Committee officers concerned within a further oonsider and pass order, in aocordatice opportunity of hearing to the petitioitier. conoemed may file additional documefits, including payment of retiral dues, if within a period of four months from order. The petitioner shall supply State counsel as well as counsel for the same to the Committee. tn case of grievance with dues, it is not necessary to flle a writ representation/apptication can be Committee, as stated above. The Retjral to entertain the representation/applicatjon, jhall issue notice to the petitioner and of 15 days. The Committee shall with law, after affording proper ifier. The petitioner and the officers (its, if neoessary. The entire exereise, ^ny, to the petitloner, be oompleted |he date of reoeipt of a copy of this or|e •thb '+I^i^T^'l TTR?ff'Ef is^i <Pq^K i?3TRn3f^i complete set of the petition to the Accountant General for transferring rejgard to non-payment of pensionary [tetition before this Court directly. The tnoved before the Retiral Dues Dues Committee shall not refuse 1, if so filed directly. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge mtRR?(>*(^»iret;,.!:Kf-]^?rhT—FS/I47—2/2010—1,00,000.