IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.616 of 2010 MD. SHAKIL Versus BIMAL KUMAR SAHU ----------- 2. 22.7.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that in view of the law laid down in Brahmdeo Prasad Vs. Baldeo Prasad and others, reported in 1998(3) PLJR 486, this Civil Revision would not be maintainable as the suit had finally been dismissed on the ground of limitation and, as such, there had been final adjudication of the rights of the parties. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit valuation being Rs.2,06,120/-, the appeal would be maintainable before this Court. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be allowed to convert this Civil Revision into an appropriate appeal. Permission is accorded. The petitioner is permitted to convert this Civil Revision into an appropriate appeal within two weeks, failing which this Civil Revision shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)