THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23482 of 2005 Between: V.Srinivasulu. .. PETITIONER And Chief Managing Director AP TRANSCO, Vidyut Soudha, Khairatabad, Hyderabad and others. .. RESPONDENTS ORDER: The petitioner is working as a contract labour under a labour contractor, engaged by the respondents. He states that he is a Diploma Holder in Electronics and Communication Engineering. The petitioner apprehends that the respondents may insist on dispensing with his services on the ground that he does not hold the Diploma in Electrical Engineering. On behalf of the respondents, a counter affidavit is filed. It is stated that it does not exist any privity of contract or relationship of an employer and employee between them and the petitioner. It is also stated that the work has been entrusted to the Labour Contractor and the entire matter is governed by the terms and conditions thereof. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The petitioner expresses an apprehension that his services may be dispensed with as a contract labour on account of insistence of possessing the qualification of a Diploma in Electrical Engineering. Nothing is indicated in the pleadings, to buttress this contention. Even if it is assumed that the respondents insisted that only those candidates, who possessed the Diploma in Electrical Engineering alone be engaged, it can be on the basis of a term, included in the contract awarded to the labour contractor. The petitioner can be said to have had any grievance, if any action is taken against him by the said contractor, who engaged him. For all practical purposes, the writ petition is premature and no relief can be granted at this stage. The writ petition is accordingly closed. No order as to costs. ______________ 14-12-2005 Prv