IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44221 of 2010 SIPAHI MAHTO @ ANIL KUMAR MAHTO, SON OF SRI RAMASHISH MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363, 364, 120B, 201 of the Indian Penal Code but charge sheet has been submitted under Section 364A, 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code Considering that the occurrence took place on account of demand for ransom in which the victim was done to death and the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of the co-accused, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)