1 wp629.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 629 OF 2011 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. M.A. Jahagirdar, Advocate for the petitioner. 1. In M.A.C.P. proceedings the petitioner intervened and sought his impleadment contending that he is the owner of offending vehicle. The claimant opposed that application. M.A.C.T. found that the respondent before it is registered owner. It has therefore rejected that prayer. 2. I do not find any jurisdictional error or perversity. No prejudice is caused to the petitioner. Petition is rejected. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE. 27.01.2011 gas/wp629.11