IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2643 of 2010 1. SUNIL KUMAR, SON OF SHRI INDRA NARAIN MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PANCHVATI NAGAR, P.O. RAJENDRA NAGAR, P.S. SULTANGANJ, PATNA-16. 2. RAMESHWAR PRASAD, SON OF LATE NATHUN PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE/MOHALLA SAHABEHORE KI TAKIA MALSALAMI, P.S. MALSALAMI, P.O. PATNA CITY, DISTRICT – PATNA. 3. MAHENDRA PRASAD YADAV, SON OF LATE CHHOTU PRASAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BELDHANA, P.O. NOORSARAI, P.S. CHANDI, DISTRICT – NALANDA. 4. GOPAL KRISHNA, SON OF LATE DR. MAHAVIR PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE/MOHALLA MAHENDRU, P.O. MAHENDRU, P.S. SULTANGANJ, DISTRICT – PATNA. …………….. PETITIONERS. VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA, NAMELY, SHRI ANJANI KUMAR SINGH, SON OF NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS. 2. DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA, NAMELY, SHRI K.P. SINHA, SON OF NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS. 3. REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PATNA DIVISION, PATNA, NAMELY, SHRI MEDO DAS, SON OF NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS. 4. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, PATNA, NAMELY, SMT. KIRAN KUMARI, WIFE OF NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS. ----------- 03/ 13.07.2011 This application has been filed by the petitioners for initiating a proceeding of contempt on the ground that the stay order dated 11.2.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 1234 of 2010 has intentionally been violated by the opposite parties. The petitioners, who are trained in physical education, were treated as trained teachers eligible for promotion to the post of Headmaster, as per the earlier decision of the State Govt. Consequently, direction was issued by the Director, 2 Secondary Education that physical trained teachers are not eligible for being promoted to the post of Headmaster. Show cause has been filed on behalf of Director, Secondary Education, O.P. No. 2 stating that the ad interim order passed by C.W.J.C. No. 1234 of 2010 when communicated to him, he immediately issued necessary orde4rs contained in Memo No. 383 dated 20.05.2010 in order to inform all concerned that order contained in Memo No. 521 dated 05.10.2009 has been stayed till disposal of the writ application. Considering this fact, this application is disposed of. DKS/ ( Mridula Mishra, J.)