WW,W.W m m WWW» 682/408 PETITIONERS 1. Prem Kumar Sahu, age about 46 years, Asst. Tea(her S/o Shri Jaggu Lal Sahu, Gm't. P u Schooi Pathan- dhorgi, Distt— Rajaxiugao (CC‘ Bhgu Ram $ahu agacx about 48 years, Ass. Teacher, S/o Shn Ubhe Ram S r Govt H1 Sec School Kumarda, D1stt~ go Hr. Sec. Schooi Kumarda, Distt—Rajnandgaon Hr. Sec School Kumardeg Distt- Ra; arldgaOmCG) Sm. Laxml khobragarhe aged about 56 ve s, UDT W/o lata 81m Sukhram Khbragarhe, Govt Hr Sec Schooi K no D'stt R nandgaomCG) UD ,W/o Shri Ramnarayan Raja Govt. H12 Se ,. School Kumartia, DisttRajnandgaon (C V} Upndra Kumar Dcwangag, aged about 38 ye , Prmc1pa1 S/o Shri Siva Ram D angan, Govt Hr Sec Schecl Kmarda ‘1 Di tRajnaadgaoniCG} ,‘Wrri,i iiriiv/f'*/ 10. MaEabir Bhagal, ag€d about 32 years, P€0n S/o Shei Govind Baghel, Govt. Hr. Sec. Schaol Kumarda, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) Venus Rasyandents 1. Stafs Govt. of Chhattisgarh Thmugh tlm Secmtary School Education Dept. Ministiy, DKS Bhawari, Disit. ~Raipur (CG) 2. 'Sta‘ne G0vt of Chhamsgarh Through ‘ S€cyeta1y Tribal Welfare Dept. Millistty, DKS Bhewan, Distt.‘ Raipur (CG) Commissioner Triba. Wolfars o). >w D rfment, Rajnajldgaon, Disti— ndgaon Eclucarioo Ofiicor, Rajnandgaon, Dis tRojnandgaon rit oetition under Art cle 225 of the Constitution of Indi W a 3. Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra M shra Q6. 12.2008 counsel for the petitioners. Shn' Axun Sac, Govt. A Vocate for the State. Heard. Shri Ajay Shrivastava, By this petition, the p titioners are praying for direction to the mspondents to consider th case for absorption of services in the School Education Depart nt as per Cjmu'iar dated 13.1.1995 1.5.2008 (Annexure 13/3) petitioners submits that services of the l Om Prakash Kosle have already been absorption in the light of Circular of . d similarly situated teacher n considered ‘ by the State _ f _ J e a " a ,' fr S J e ey a o ‘ Annexure P/ 1‘ H5 further 3d )mits that he is not pressing this petition mis stage, however, he prays for libeity to the petitioners to make a . defajled represgntation for I reSQonéiElli No.1, who may mpmsentation withm a spachi Shri Afun Sao, Govt. j‘ ax in case the petitioner§ respondent No. 1 for red'mss‘ considered and (lecitied in t‘ accorciance ‘with law within rocoipt of tho 'repr6$enfation. in View of above submi tho instant petition is dispq‘ make a detailed representa redmssal of their grievances; the same 'on its own merits Circular of Annexure P] 1, wi1 receipt of the representation. ssions of learned counsel for the parties, sed of with liberty to the petitioners to .tion before the respondent No. edressal of their grievances before the be. to decide their further directed Led period. idvocate appearixlg for .the State eubmit file a fresh representation before tr? a1 of their grievarlces, the same s‘heil be he light of Circular of Annexure P] 1 in a period of six Weeks from the date of 1 for who, in turn, shall consider arid decide in accordance with law, in the light of hjn e period of six weeks from the riate of (“/«r Sd/— v Dhirendra Mishra Judge [niei'FLaii g m at