Crl. Revision No. 2924 of 2010 (O&M) -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Revision No. 2924 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.10.2012. Krishan Kumar .......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Advocate for the petitioner. **** SABINA, J. Petitioner was tried for an offence under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code ('IPC' for short) in FIR No. 79 dated 20.3.2003 registered at Police Station Jhajjar. The trial court vide judgment/order dated 22.4.2010/23.4.2010 ordered the conviction and sentence of the petitioner under Section 409 IPC. In appeal against the said judgment and order of conviction and sentence, the Appellate Court reduced the sentence qua imprisonment of the petitioner to the period already undergone by him. Hence, the present petition by the petitioner. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves dismissal. Before the Appellate Court the learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted that he did not press the appeal qua conviction of the petitioner under Section 409 IPC. Prayer was only made to the extent that the sentence of the petitioner be reduced to already undergone by him. The said request was accepted by the Appellate Court and the sentence qua imprisonment of the petitioner was reduced to already undergone by him vide impugned judgment dated 6.5.2011. Since the judgment dated 6.5.2011 was passed in terms of the submissions made by the learned counsel Crl. Revision No. 2924 of 2010 (O&M) -2- for the petitioner, no ground for interference is made out. Dismissed. (SABINA) JUDGE October 17, 2012 Gurpreet