V./ <? .^^^I^ INTHEISKSCOUSTOFJVDICATURE A'lrBILASFUR WRFFPETmONNO. rl'2-^C,OF2Q04 Ranaesh Rafie ,S^o Late Shri Ankathadas Padei Age sbout 28 pmmoNER: ' years. r/o vill^B-AmtidiM ...;(^^" ^=hco,aat <'.P-^' ('?F^^ .^.^ 'o«>s^e<iOT''..-?^-'" ftESSUS pte° da^d " • RESPONDBNTS (1) Stsate Qf Ciihatti%a(ii, ferou^i DtK-S. Bufl<lingR£ripur(CG.) (2) EfaectoE Lok Shifcdiaa Raipur (3) Distdct Educs&m Gffica- (4) OafExicutiveQfBcff;|teni)aii PandQiat -bodla, ESstfc- j (ca) '»^ IffiaS'ia(31M^iai2!^3^<^T'HE:CONSIlII'im il ili l.i-U XI-HC-22 -3^ ^rprorq. ^^•9^(0. fsicii-yy ^^••^•^61 t)i*<MI »ll<|cf) iss^v' 31I^?I ;BT SiR^I sb4i4> ft^S an^i ^CTSH iif?a 22-12-2005 Petitioner by ShriimxA. S-v^Un^ ^ •*l^d4l-< •qpRT! V fsTZT if ^siPtn.m^t 'pA^'Advocate. Shri P.S. Koshy, Dy. Adv. General for the State. Heard. - ? This ease relates to compassiona|te appointment consequent upon the death of an ••• employee ser/ing in the State. Learned counset for the petitioner] categorically stated that in this case, the death of the employee has occurred on or after 1 -} 1 -1997 and not eariier. It is further submitted that in batch of cases bearing W.P. No. 1322/^002 involving the same question orders have been passed by this Court on 20/12/2005. He jjirays that similar orders may be passed in this case also. 'j ; Learned counsel forthe State doe^ not dispute the above fact and state that the State of Chhattjsgarh has taken a decision to consider the cases of dependants of those employees who died on or after 1/11/1997 strictly in accordance with the policy prevalent at that time. In view of the submissions mac(e by leamed counsel appearing for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the me|rits ofthe case, in the opinion ofthis Court, ends of justice will be sen/ed if a direction is giv^n to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities concerned to consider and decide the c^se of the petitioner in accordance with the policy prevalent at the time of death of the emj^loyee concemed. If the petitioner found eligible, appointment orders will be issued as eaj^ly as possible on or before 30 April, 2006. The petitioner is also directed to render due ccji-operation to the authorities. It is made clear that if any grievance still remains, the petition^r may avail the remedy avaiiable underthe law including filing of the petition before this C^ourt. With the aforesaid observations, tlfiis petition stands disposed of. Certifled copy as per rules. Copy to the State counsel, who respondents for complianc6. will be obliged to communicate the order to the Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge br^iiinui iiii-iiijy