1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.2069 of NO.2069 of NO.2069 of 1985 The Surat Cotton Spi. Wea.MillsP.Ltd & ors. Plffs M/s Kermani Trans.Ser. .. Defendant Mr.D.B.Parab i/b Gor.Foz. for Plffs Ms Aruna Mehta i/b S.Pathak & Co for Deft CORAM CORAM CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J : D.G. KARNIK, J : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED DATED DATED : 12th August, 2005. : 12th August, 2005. : 12th August, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The defendant have not filed a written statement for nearly 20 years. Hence, the averments made in the plaint are deemed to be accepted. 2. The suit is for recovery of money. The suitis decreed under Order 8 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). D.G.KARNIK, J