IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13980 of 2007 BHARAT KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 04.07.2008 Faced with the predicament of his challenge to an advertisement of 2004 in pursuance of which appointment on the post of Shiksha Mitra came to be made in 2005 when the original contractual period of 11 months for which the petitioner claims to have been wronged has long expired and that the petitioner filed his first representation by registered acknowledgement due as late as September, 2007 and the new statutory Rules for eligibility and procedures for selection having come into force on 1.7.2006 as Bihar Panchayat Primary Teachers (Appointment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2006, learned counsel confines his submission to the challenge for an enquiry into the illegal appointment of Respondent no. 11. The writ application is disposed with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application with regard to the appointment of Respondent no. 11 before the statutory authority under Rule 18. If such an application is filed, this Court requires the statutory authority to consider and decide the same expeditiously within four months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order before him after hearing all concerned. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)