IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD Thursday, the 30th day of June, 2011 Present: Hon’ble Sri Justice N. Ravi Shankar Crl.R.C..No. 1223 of 2011 Between: Maddikunta Narasimha Rao …Petitioner and The State of AP …Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR Crl.R.C..No. 1223 of 2011 Judgment Heard Sri N. M. Krishnaiah, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that all the witnesses in P.R.C.No. 44 of 2004 on the file of the court of learned I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kothagudem gave false statements before the police, including the FIR which is said to be false one and therefore the persons who are shown as witnesses and the person who gave the FIR should be summoned for being proceeded against as accused. 3. For the above relief, the petitioner filed Crl.M.P.No. 47 of 2011 in P.R.C.No. 44 of 2004 before the Committal Court for summoning the said persons who are shown as LWs 1 to 7 and 11 in the charge sheet. The Committal Court dismissed that application observing that the petitioner can ventilate his grievance before the Sessions Court to which the case has been committed. It may be noted that the petitioner herein in the first instance says that the case against him is a false one and it is for the sessions court to take up the trial of the sessions case and decide the same on evidence and later the petitioner can pursue his other remedies. For these reasons I agree with the order of the committal court which dismissed his application. 4. It is once again made clear that it shall be open for the petitioner to contest the sessions case in the first instance and pursue other remedies. 5. This petition is accordingly dismissed at the admission stage. The petitioner shall always have the liberty to pursue his other remedies. _____________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J. June 30, 2011. *BVS