IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3243 of 2008 RAM PRASAD BHAGAT, SON OF LATE BABU LAL BHAGAT, RESIDENT OF HARIGANJ CHOWK, P.O. KATIHAR, P.S. KATIHAR, DISTRICT-KATIHAR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER -CUM-SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR. 5. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA. 6. THE REGISTRAR, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA. 7. THE FINANCE OFFICER, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA. 8. THE PRINCIPAL, D.S. COLLEGE, KATIHAR. ----------- 2. 30.6.2009. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the University. The grievance of the petitioner is that the pension calculation chart as contained in Annexure-3 is not correct. For that the petitioner represented on 7.12.2007 as contained in Annexure-2, but the same has not been considered as yet as the petitioner has not received any reply. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the University submits that in case, petitioner files a fresh representation, the same shall be considered - 2 - N.H./ without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner proposes to file fresh representation for redressal of his grievance. In case, such representation containing relevant details is filed within a period of four weeks along with certified copy of the order before the respondent no.5, the respondent no.5 shall consider the same in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months of receipt of such representation. This writ application is disposed of with the above observations and directions. ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)