IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 1749 of 2011. Decided on: April 4, 2011. Santosh Kumar. Versus State of H.P. & others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl.AG and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG for respondents No. 1 & 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is essentially aggrieved by Annexure P-3, report of inquiry, pursuant to which his appointment as PTA teacher is found to be not acceptable. That report of the inquiry committee is in September, 2008. It is seen that the said inquiry report was prepared on the basis of Annexure P-2, Notification. That Notification, Annexure P-2 provides for an appeal in case any person is aggrieved by the report of the Committee. It is also seen that the appeal should be filed within 30 days. We are informed that no appeal has been filed and it is more than two years. We do not think that at this distance of time, it will be proper for this Court to direct the respondents to inquire into the matter. The reasons as stated in the impugned order are also formidable. For these reasons, we do not find any merit in the present writ petition which is accordingly dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. April 4, 2011. ( Justice Sanjay Karol ), (karan/vs) Judge.