IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39770 of 2009 Navin Singh @ Phantoos Singh, Son of Late Naresh Singh, Resident of Village Sri Rampur Thuthi, P.S. Parbatta, District Khagaria. ------- Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ------- Opp. Party ----------- 2 19.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The petitioner faces prosecution for an offence under Section 25(1-B)A, 26 of the Arm Act and it is said that there was a recovery of loaded country made pistol with four spare cartridges. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner at present is totally infirm person, inasmuch as, he is not in a position to even move by both of his legs and for that very reason, he has not been even produced in court on several dates. The criminal history revealed by the counsel for the petitioner in paragraph no.10 of the bail application would go to show that earlier there has been no case against him under the Arms Act. Thus, considering the pitiable physical condition of the petitioner and his period of custody from 11.1.2009, this Court would 2 direct the petitioner, namely, Navin Singh @ Phantoos Singh for being released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 8 of 2009 (G.R. No. 50 of 2009), subject to the condition that one of the bailors shall be either of his parents or any other close family relative. It is, however, made clear that if now the petitioner is found to be made accused in any more case, he would become liable for cancellation of the present bail as well. It goes without saying that the petitioner will also remain present in course of trial and his absence on two consecutive dates in course of such trial will lead to automatic cancellation of his present bail. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)