IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.23303 of 2011 Geeta Devi wife of Ram Bilash Sadai Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 4/ 18.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 366, 366-A, 368, 372, 373 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3(i) (x) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Considering that the girl has been recovered and she stated that she had been sold for the purpose of marriage and not for prostitution, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail after framing of charge in the case against her on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, in connection with Deodha P.S. Case No.15 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and another bailor shall be Ram Prasad Sadai, cousin brother-in-law of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if she is, she shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is 2 implicated in any other case of similar nature after her release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)