IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 14656 of 2010 Date of Decision: 18.8.2010. Om Parkash & others --Petitioners Versus M.D., D.H.B.V.N. Ltd. And others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.S. Kundu, Addl. A.G., Haryana has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioners joined the Haryana State Electricity Board as T- Mates on work charge basis. Later the services of the petitioners were regularized. They also earned promotions as Line Man and Foreman. Petitioners retired from service on different dates as specified in para 2 of the writ petition. The only grouse of the petitioners is that the respondents have not counted work charge period towards the qualifying service as also for grant of additional increments of higher standard pay scales on completion of 10/20 years of service. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents. CWP. No. 14656 of 2010 -2- In view of the above, this petition is disposed of in the following manner:- 1. The petitioners shall make a representation to the respondents within a period of four weeks. 2. The respondents may examine and decide the representation of the petitioners within a period of three months thereafter. In the event the claim of the petitioners is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 18.8.2010. lucky