IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15250 of 2011 Tapeshwar Paswan, S/O Late Shiv Nandan Paswan, R/O Village- Mahnedpur, P.S.- Anti, District- Gaya. . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Gaya 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Tekari, Gaya 4. The Block Development Officer, Gaya. . . . . Respondents. ----------- 2/ 30.09.2011 The petitioner, who is a P.D.S. dealer under Konch Block in the district of Gaya, prays for quashing Memo no.525 dated 20.07.2011, issued under the signature of Sub-Divisional Officer, Tekari, Gaya, whereby he has been directed to refund the value of 1328 quintals of undistributed rice at APL rate of Rs. 13.10 per kg. allotted under SGRY Scheme. The petitioner disputes the quantity of rice and submits that hardly 1100 quintals of rice would remain with him. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would also govern the instant writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would 2 either deposit 15% of the value of 1100 quintals of undistributed rice at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself as claimed by the petitioner, if already not deposited within two months. No coercive steps would be taken against the petitioner. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)