IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32469 of 2011 Himanshu Shekhar Sahi @ Putul Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 15.10.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, complainant and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 418, 420 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the complainant was persuading by one Digamber Sharma for investment in a chit fund on promise of considerable return for which cheque was given by the complainant to Digamber Sharma and subsequently the complainant received maturity amount through cheque which got bounced. It is alleged against the petitioner that Digamber Sharma intruduced the petitioner as brother-in-law and office bearer of organization. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that through Digamber Sharma they all have cheated the complainant. Considering the fact that thrust of accusation is against Digamber Sharma, let the petitioner, above named, be released on 2 bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 2419 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Gopalganj, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)