THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.703 of 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed against the docket order, dated 31.12.2010, passed in I.A.No.953 of 2010 in O.S.No.36 of 2002 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kovur, whereby the petition filed for permission to mark the documents mentioned in the list therein was allowed to the extent of the last document i.e., (h) of the list and dismissed so far as the other documents i.e., (a) to (g) of the list are concerned. The petitioner herein is the 3rd plaintiff and the respondents herein are the defendants in the suit in O.S.No.36 of 2002 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kovur. During pending of the said suit, the petitioner herein filed I.A.No.953 of 2010 to permit him to mark the documents mentioned in the list therein as exhibits. The respondents/defendants filed counter affidavit resisting the claim of the petitioner. The Court below, after considering the matter in detail, passed the impugned docket order, dated 31.12.2010, as stated supra. Aggrieved thereby, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. Heard the learned counsel for both parties and perused the material available on record. A perusal of the affidavit filed in support of the present I.A.No.953 of 2010 discloses that the 1st plaintiff, who is the father of the petitioner herein, has already filed the documents which the petitioner herein now sought to mark as exhibits and, as such, the petitioner herein requested the court below to permit him to mark the same documents as exhibits. The Court below noticed that the 1st and 2nd plaintiffs have already filed a petition in I.A.No.175 of 2010, seeking to receive the documents mentioned therein, and the said petition was dismissed except for one document, which is mentioned as the last document in the list of documents mentioned in the present petition, and that the petitioner herein cannot again pray for the same relief which was rejected earlier, and therefore, by the impugned order dated 31.12.2010, allowed the present petition only to the extent of the last document i.e., (h), which was already permitted in I.A.No.175 of 2010 filed by the 1st and 2nd plaintiffs, and dismissed the petition with regard to the other documents i.e., (a) to (g) mentioned in the list of documents. Further, in support of his case, the petitioner has not given any independent reason in his affidavit filed in support of the petition. Thus, I am of the considered opinion that the Court below has not committed any error warranting interference of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and the Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY,J 17.06.2011 V V