IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39932 of 2010 KAPIL YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.38197 of 2010 SANTOSH MISHRA @ BABA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 21.12.2010 Both the above stated Cr. Misc. cases have arisen out of Sherghati P.S. Case No. 81 of 2010 registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and accordingly, both the Cr. Misc. cases are being disposed of by this common order. Petitioners are not named in the First Information Report. It is stated that in course of investigation, one stolen mobile was recovered from possession of petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 38197 of 2010. The aforesaid petitioner confessed his guilt and also disclosed the name of petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 39932 of 2010. The contention of learned counsel for petitioners is that the mobile which is said to have been recovered from possession of petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 38197 of 2010 is different and the number of said mobile does not tally with the stolen mobile. The aforesaid contention is fairly accepted by learned P.P. appearing for the State. In view of the aforesaid circumstance, above named petitioners, Kapil Yadav and Santosh Mishra @ Baba, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with above stated Sherghati P.S. Case No. 81 of 2010. 2 It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioners that due to typing mistake Santosh Mishra @ Baba, name of petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 38197 of 2010, has been typed as Babu in place of Baba. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to correct the aforesaid defect in course of the day. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)