IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 31ST AUGUST 2010 / 9TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 24248 of 2010(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. P.C.SREEKUMAR, PARATHATTU VEEDU, KOODAPPULAM, P.O.RAMAPURAM BAZAR, KOTTAYAM DIST. (SECRETARY, JUNAKEEYA JALA VITHARANA SOCIETY REG. NO. K 373). 2. STEPHAN.C.J., CHALIL VEEDU, KOODAPPULAM, P.O RAMAPURAM BAZAR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, (SECRETARY JANAKEEYA JALA VITHARANA SOCIETY REG. NO. K 373). BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, P.O.RAMAPURAM BAZAR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 576. 2. R.CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR, EDAT TU HOUSE, P.O.RAMAPURAM BAZAR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 576. 3. K.S. SANTHOSH KUMAR, KOLLAPPILLIYIL VEEDU, KOODAPULAM, P.O.RAMAPURAM BAZAR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 576. MR.NARAYANAN, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.24248 of 2010 (E) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 31st day of August, 2010 J U D G M E N T What is under challenge in the writ petition is an order passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum. 2. Statute itself provides for appellate remedy against the said proceedings. This writ petition is therefore dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg