IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5178 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.L.GOKHALE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- RAVJIBHAI SHANKERBHAI PATEL Versus DEPUTY SECRETARY -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MI HAVA for Petitioners MR MA BUKHARI ASSTT.GOVT.PLEADER for respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE H.L.GOKHALE Date of decision: 06/08/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT Rule. Mr.Bukhari, AGP, waives the service of Rule for the respondent. Heard Mr. Hawa for the petitioners and Mr. Bukhari, AGP, for the respondent. It appears that after the order of the competent authority under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, the respondent decided to initiate a suo motu revision. A show cause notice was given to the petitioners on 20/10/1994 and the petitioners had given reply thereto. All that Mr. Hawa states and prays is that the revisional authority may be directed to hear the petitioners and to pass appropriate order. Mr. Bhukhari for the respondent has no objection to this request. The request is accordingly granted. The authority who has initiated revision will hear and decide the revision application of the State expeditiously and in any case within six weeks from the receipt of the writ of this court. This petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule is made absolute accordingly, with no order as to costs. ----- ccs