IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-18575 of 2010 Date of Decision: 09.02.2011 Dayal Singh & Ors. ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & Ors. ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Manish Prabhaker, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G., Punjab for the respondent-State. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 5 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from respondents No.6 to 10. Respondent no.1 has already been served. However, no reply has been filed on his behalf. Taking into account the allegations in the present case, the same is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police Rural Amritsar to look into the threat perception of the petitioners and provide necessary security, if need be. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 09.02.2011 JUDGE gurpreet