1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application No.1465 of 2008 IN Criminal Appeal No.203 of 2010 [Atul L. Somani Vs. Sanjay Uttamrao Nikalje] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. P.R. Dixit, A. Nishant Rao, A.J. Rao, Mr. R.R. Vyas, Advs., for appellant [absent]. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 27th April, 2010. 1. Various Farad orders show that all throughout, the applicant has not been vigilant in attending the case, though the same has been listed on number of occasions for admission- hearing. 2. Notice, though ordered, could not be served on the respondent on account of failure to take steps. 3. It is also seen that the case was dismissed, and was restored by this Court on payment of cost of Rs.5,000-00. 4. It is, thus, seen that the case has gone unattended. 5. On 26th March, 2010, this Court had directed that the appeal be listed for admission-hearing without waiting for service. 2 Even thereafter, the matter has gone unattended. 6. On 8th April, 2010, learned Adv. Mr. R.R. Vyas appeared and prayed for time, as he undertook to file power within two days. Even thereafter the matter has remained unattended. 7. None appeared on 22nd April, 2010 when the case was re-listed. 8. In view of above, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Judge |Hedau|