1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.887 OF 2010 Jamsing Jalamsing Jarhade, Convict No.6165, Central Prison, Aurangabad ..PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ..RESPONDENT Miss Sudha S. Kulthe, Advocate (appointed) for the petitioner; Mr D.R. Kale, A.P.P. for the respondent. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE : 18th October, 2010 PER COURT : A communication sent by the petitioner through jail seeks to challenge the correctness of the order passed by the respondents, dated 27.7.2010 dismissing his application for his release on parole. We had accordingly appointed Advocate Miss Sudha Kulthe, learned Counsel to represent the petitioner in this petition before us. 2 2. The learned A.P.P. has pointed out to us by referring to his affidavit in reply, that on two occasions the petitioner, who had been released, had reported late. On 4.9.2007 the petitioner had been released and he had reported late by 69 days and thereafter again on 1.1.2009 the petitioner had been released and he had reported late by 39 days. 3. Without adverting to the merits of the matter, we find that the petitioner is relying upon a certificate issued by the Medical Officer, dated 24.2.2009. In the said certificate it is stated that the wife of the petitioner is suffering from heavy bleeding and polermohoes. Since the certificate is of more than 1-1/2 years old, we dismiss this petition but grant liberty to the petitioner to apply afresh on the basis of a recent certificate in respect of the ailment of the wife of the petitioner. 4. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed with the liberty as stated above. We quantify the fees payable to the learned Counsel appointed on behalf of the petitioner at Rs.1,500/-. ( A.V. POTDAR, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) amj/criwp887.10