IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5792 of 2009 MANOJ DAS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 11/5/2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. While this Court would find nothing wrong in the order passed by the authority in the order dated 26.8.2008 intimating the petitioner that even if he had not appeared in the counselling his case was duly considered and as such there was no need for his recounselling but then the petitioner has definitely a right to know whether on the basis of 13 point, secured by him, in the scheduled caste category, any person having secured 13 or less points in S.C. Category have been appointed or not. This Court therefore would only give liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority with a fresh representation and in the event any candidate in the scheduled caste category has been appointed having secured less marks/points to the petitioner, the authority will be enjoined to also consider his case for appointment, but if candidates having higher marks/points than the petitioner have been only appointed, the said authority will only pass an order informing the petitioner to this effect within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation of the petitioner. 2 With the aforementioned observations and directions this application is disposed of. Abhay Kumar (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)