IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1475 of 2009 1. SATYA RAI 2. JANARDAN RAI 3. MAHANAND RAI 4. GURU DAYAL SINGH 5. RAMTA RAI 6. JOGENDRA RAI 7. MANAGAR RAI 8. DIPTI RAI 9. LAL BIHARI RAI 10. BHEKHA RAI 11. RAM SUNDAR RAI 12. BIJENDRA RAI 13. HIRDYA RAI 14. CHANDRA SHEKHAR RAI All residents of village Maudahi, P.S.Bihta, District Patna ----------------- PETITIONERS Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Ramjit Sao, s/o late Ramdahin Sao, Resident of village Maudhi, P.S.Bihta, District Patna ------------ OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 2 14.9.2009 This revision petition is preferred against the judgment and order dated 6.8.2009 passed by Shri Raghwendra Kumar Singh, Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. V, Patna in Cr.Appeal no. 202/05 affirming the order of conviction and sentence dated 5.12.05 passed by Dr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Danapur at Patna in Bihta P.S.Case no. 207/98, G.R.no. 147/98 whereby petitioners have been convicted and sentenced to undergo three years R.I. for offence under sections 324 - 2 - and 325 IPC and one year R.I for the offence under sections 147, 148 and 323 IPC to run concurrently and fine of Rs. 2000/-. Learned counsel for the informant has entered appearance by filing Vakalatnama. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the informant and the State. The parties are co-villagers. Differences were otherwise. Case and counter case is there between the parties. A compromise petition on behalf of the informant and the injured witnesses is being filed in Court stating therein that both the parties have compromised their dispute outside the Court. The case filed on behalf of accused persons is already disposed of basing the compromise between the parties and single offence for which conviction and sentence was recorded, is compoundable but with permission of the Court, which under the circumstance stated above, is accorded. Accordingly, the revision application is allowed in view of aforesaid compromise and the judgment and orders dated 6.8.2009 and - 3 - 5.12.2005 passed by both the courts below are set aside. All the petitioners are acquitted of the charges for which convicted and sentenced and are directed to be released forthwith, if not required in any other case. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax at the cost of the petitioners. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI