IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 22ND JUNE 2010 / 1ST ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 18753 of 2010(T) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- R. VIJAYALAKSHMI AMMA, AGED 40 YEARS, W/O.S.B. PRABODHA DEV, WORKING AS JUNIOR AUDITOR/ CONCURRENT AUDITOR, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERAIVE SOCIETIES (AUDIT) NEYYATTINKARA, RESIDING AT "DHANYA", KALLINGAL JUNCTION, NEDUMANGAD P.O.THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 541. BY ADV. SRI.R.RANJITH, SRI.RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES OFFICE OF REGISTARAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, STATUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -1. 2. THE ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, STATUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (AUDIT), BAKERY JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (AUDIT), OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, (AUDIT) NEYYATTINKARA. R1 TO R4 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER MR.K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/06/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO. 18753 OF 2010 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 22nd DAY OF JUNE, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a Junior Co-operative Inspector. She seeks a posting to any of the vacancies in Thiruvananthapuram City. According to the petitioner, there are at present seven vacancies in Thiruvananthapuram City. According to her, her present posting at Neyyattinkara causes a lot of inconvenience and hardship to her for the reason that she has two daughters, who are school going children. Since her husband is not in Station, she is not in a position to look after her children and to attend to her work. Though she had submitted Ext.P5 representation to the first respondent, no action was taken thereon. Therefore, she filed WP(C) No.14964 of 2010 before this court. The writ petition was disposed of by Ext.P6 judgment directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5. Accordingly, the representation of the petitioner was considered and has been declined as per Ext.P8 proceedings. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that at present there are seven Wpc 18753/2010 2 vacancies within Thiruvananthapuram City and that petitioner could be accommodated in one of the vacancies without any difficulty. In fact, considering the pathetic situation of the petitioner, it is also necessary that she is so accommodated. Therefore, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P9, a fresh representation before the first respondent. He prays for a sympathetic consideration of Ext.P9. The learned Senior Government Pleader has no objection to the matter being directed to be considered. 3. I notice from Ext.P9 representation that the petitioner's husband is posted at Kasargod and that he is not in Station. Her female children are only in their tender ages, studying in school in the lower classes. Her present place of posting being at a distance of 35 kms away from her place of residence, it is stated that she finds it extremely difficult to attend to her official duties and to look after her children. Since she is not in a position to attend to her work, it is submitted that she is compelled to take leave constantly. Since Ext.P9 is pending consideration of the first respondent, this writ petition can be disposed of directing Ext.P9 to be considered expeditiously. 4. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of Wpc 18753/2010 3 directing the first respondent to consider the grievance of the petitioner set out in Ext.P9 sympathetically considering the fact that seven vacancies are available in Thiruvananthapuram City itself, one of which could be utilised for accommodating her and to pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the first respondent for compliance. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE lgk