1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 3234/2007 (Shersingh @ Bagda Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 19/7/2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Suresh Kumbhat for the petitioner. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha Public Prosecutor. Mr. Pradeep Shah for the complainant. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by counsel for the complainant. Perused the order impugned and the police investigation diary as also the statement of victim Kailash Kumari. From the statement of victim it appears that the petitioner married to the victim in the childhood and it has not been disputed by victim even that she was married wife of petitioner. Though the manner in which the occurrence took place may not be countenanced but then in good belief the husband-petitioner has taken his wife. Mr. Pradeep Shah, counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the bail and submitted that it was a highhanded act of the petitioner. Be that as it may, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the victim married to the petitioner may be in the childhood, as also having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, without commenting on the merit of the case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Sher Singh @ Bagda Ram S/o Kastoor Ji, be released on bail in CR No. 68/2007 P.S. Modra, district 2 Jalore provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP