(D ^iS-ssa i '"?5^isi. IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(C.G,) WRIT PETITION (C) N0. ^i^y OF 2010 PETITIONER Smt. Satyav^ Patel W/o Shri Kanhailal Patel, aged about 65 years, R/o Gram -Chote Bhandar Post- Bade Bhandar ,Tahsil-Pusour Dstrict- Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS:!. The State of Chhattisgarh , through the Secretary , Revenue Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). , N^ 1<& /^? •'Aq ^^ ^^ sF'N'' ,^'t ^ ^' '•<.: A'-" ^' 2. The CoUector, Raigarh, Distaict Raigarh (CG). 3^The Sub Divisional Officer (R), / Land Acquisition Officer, Raigarh, Disti-ict Raigarh (CG). 4. The General Manager, District Trade and Industa-y Centre, Raigarh (CG). <-^ 5. The Union of India through Secretary Environment and Forest Mantralay , New Delhi. 6. M/s Korba West Power Company Lunited , having its registered of&ce at 31 Jamadar Khana, Suranges Bade Gwalior ,(M.P.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. »-"• ..'t'1 HIGH_CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETITION (C)NO. 4373_O^F2010 Smt. Satyawati Patel RESPONDENTS Versus ' The State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Rajeev Shrivastava & Shri Kamal Kishore Patel, Advocates for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, Advocate for the respondent No.6. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 7th day of September, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to other alternative forum that may be available under the, provisions of Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection. 2) It is ordered, as prayed for. 3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above-stated liberty, if so advised. If the objection raised by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with taw and on its own merits. ——-—-_-_„_ _. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge