IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 11686 of 2008. Decided on: 28.07.2011. ___________________________________________ Bal Krishan Sharma and another. … Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : Mr. Chandranarayana Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 4. Respondent No.5 already ex- parte. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Vikas Rathore, learned Deputy Advocate General 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - petitioner as undertaken by the Principal Secretary (Health) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh in the supplementary affidavit, reproduced hereinabove, within a period of four weeks after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. July 28, 2011. (sck).