IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 18TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 29TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 5292 of 2010(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. MELAKATH KUNJAHAMMED, S/O.MOHAMMED, KAKKANGAYIPADANNA HOUSE, P.O.KARUVANTHURUTHY, FEROKE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. KANNANARI SAITHALAVI,S/O.MOHAMMEDKUTTY, KAKKANGAYIPADANNA HOUSE, P.O.KARUVANTHURUTHY, FEROKE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.J.MATHEW SRI.THOMAS JOHN AMBOOKEN SRI.K.B.ARUNKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA RPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KOZHIKODE, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE. 3. THE TAHASHILDAR, KOZHIKODE TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, KOZHIKODE. 4. VILLAGE OFFIER, KARUVANTHURUTHY VILLAGE, P.O.KARUVANTHURUTHY, FEROKE,KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 5. FEROKE GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY (SPECIAL GRADE),FEROKE P.O. KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 6. DISTRICT REGISTRAR, KOZHIKODE. 7. SOOPYTHODIPADANNAYIL HASSAN KOYA, S/O.MOHAMMEDKUTTY, PADANNAYIL HOUSE, THEKKETHALA, P.O.KARUVANTHURUTHY, FEROKE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT,PIN-673643. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. K.R. DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.5292 OF 2010 (J) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner alleges that the 7th respondent has encroached into the Purambokku of Kakkangayi Padanna Thodu. According to the petitioner the said Thodu is vested in the 5th respondent Panchayat. It is alleged that despite having brought to the notice of the 5th respondent Panchayat of the encroachment made by the 7th respondent, no action has been taken. If as stated by the petitioner, any complaint has been received, it is directed that the 5th respondent shall take action with notice to the 7th respondent, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with copy of this writ petition before the Panchayat for compliance. It is clarified that this court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :