IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI SATURDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2009 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 14151 of 2009(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. MUHAMMED IQBAL.K., S/O.MUHAMMED ALI, AGED 22 YEARS, KAKKATTU HOUSE, CHELAKKAD P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. MUSAFAR ALI K.P., MAGVA, KAIVELICKAL, PUTHUR P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J --------------------------- W.P.(C).14151 of 2009 --------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2009 JUDGMENT The 1st petitioner was a student of KMCT College of Engineering, Kozhikode and 2nd petitioner was a student of Government Engineering College, Kozhikode. Both of them were B.Tech students. The College is affiliated to the Calicut University. The Branch of study is Mechanical Engineering. They have completed their course of study in the month of March, 2008. Both the petitioners had appeared for the 6th semester examination. When the results were published, 1st petitioner had failed in two papers and 2nd petitioner failed for one paper. Apparently, dissatisfied with the marks obtained by them, they had applied for revaluation. They are aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation. W.P.(C).14151 of 2009 :: 2 :: Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent-University to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioners in relation to the B.Tech 6th Semester Examination, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, provided the application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct. Sd/- (V.GIRI) Judge sk/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge