IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.27506 of 2007 Date: 12th November, 2009 Between: Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Secunderabad, rep. by its Chief Executive Officer. .. Petitioner And Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.27506 of 2007 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 4 in not assigning any survey number to the land admeasuring Ac.28-29 guntas situated between Hasmathpet and Kanojiguda village (now claimed as part of Alwal village) with an additional extent of 17 guntas for the approach road in Sy.No.285 of the said village, Ranga Reddy district and not mutating the name of Government of India represented by Cantonment Board in the revenue records including pahani pathrika as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and violative of Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India. There is no necessity of going into all the details. The respondents filed a counter stating that the land to an extent of Ac.28-29 guntas situated between Hasmathpet and Kanojiguda village (now claimed as part of Alwal village) with an additional extent of 17 guntas for the approach road in Sy.No.285 of the said village, Ranga Reddy district is not allotted with any survey number earlier. Now the Survey Department personnel have surveyed the land and demarcated the same and they would issue the survey number soon. In view of the same, the respondents 2 to 4 are directed to get the subject land surveyed and be given a survey number and also decide as to whether the subject land falls in Balanagar mandal or Malkajgiri mandal. This exercise shall be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Insofar as other reliefs are concerned, they cannot be agitated in a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and it is for the petitioner to work out its remedies before the statutory authorities, as per law. The writ petition is accordingly closed. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 12.11.2009 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.27506 of 2007 12.11.2009