IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2008 / 28TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 18281 of 2008(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ P.M.S.A.HUSSAIN KOYA THANGAL S/O.KUNHISEEDIKOYA THANGAL 54 YEARS DILSHAD MAHAL, MELMURI, MALAPPURAM BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. DISTRICT TOWN PLANNER MALAPPURAM 2. MANJERI MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MANJERI MALAPPURAM 3. PERINGATTUTHODIKA SHEHERBAN, W/O.ABDUL KARIM CHERUKODE HOUSE, PATHAPIRIYAM, MALAPPURAM R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI P.A.SALIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) 18281 of 2008 -------------------------------------------------------- Dated: JUNE 18, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner's complaint is regarding certain constructions allegedly made by the 3rd respondent. According to him, he had represented this matter initially to the 2nd respondent by submitting Ext.P2. He had followed up the matter by representing to the 1st respondent also. It is stated that the 1st respondent called for a report from the 2nd respondent by Ext.P3. Petitioner also submits that the 1st respondent again had issued Ext.P4 and that Exts.P3 and P4 did not evoke any response from the 2nd respondent. It is on account of this stalemate, the petitioner has filed Ext.P5 representation to the 2nd respondent, with copy to the 1st respondent. As Ext.P5 also remains unattended, this writ petition has now been filed by the petitioner and the request now made is to direct the 2nd respondent to take action on Ext.P5. 2. Having regard to the submissions made as above, without expressing anything on the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, I direct that the 2nd respondent shall take note of WP(C) 18281/08 2 Ext.P5 and consider the same with notice to the petitioner and the 3rd respondent, and pass appropriate orders thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, and at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. 3. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE mt/-