IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3422 of 2006 KANCHAN SAHNI Son of Shri Jaylal Sahni, Resident of Village Panapur, Post-Narayan, P.S. Minapur, District-Muzaffarpur. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur. 3.The Block Development Officer, Minapur. 4.TheElection Officer, Vidyalaya Shiksha Samiti, Minapur-2. 5.The Block Education Extension Officer, Minapur. 6.Mukhiya, Panapur. 7.The Head Master, Rajkiya Madhya Vidyalaya, Panapur. 8.The Thana-in-charge, O.P. Panapur Thana Minapur. 9.Shanti Devi Widow of Late Mahesh Paswan. 10.Ramprit Ram Son of Late Chulhai Ram. 11.Rajdeo Sahni Son of Late Janak Sahni. 12.Smt. Lal Muni Devi Wife of Shatrughan Bhagat. 13.Rameshwar Rai Sonof Late Sukhdeo Rai. 14.Smt. Rekha Devi Wife of Shri Bindeshwar Rai. 15.Md. Nazar Son of Md. Habib 16.Amina Khatoon widow of Late Old Bashir 17.Smt. Vim Devi Wife of Vinod Dubey 18.Ramdeo Dubey Son of Late Mutuk Debey 19.Ram babu Prasad son of Shri Gopat jee Prasad 20.Sudarshan Rai son of late Jainandan Rai 21.Vinod Kumar son of Shri Ramdeo Pd.Kushwaha 22.Nand Kishore Sahu son of Shri Narayan Sahu Nos. 9 to 22 residents of village-panapur Block and P.S. Minapur District Muzaffarpur. 23. Chandrika Dwivedi Father’s name not known to the petitioner, headmaster Rajkiya Madhya Vidyalay, Panapur Village- Panapur, Block and P.S. Mina pur District-Muzaffarpur. ----------- 7 10/8/2009 Heard counsel for the parties. Prayer in this writ application is confined to a direction to the respondent authorities to conduct the election for Rajkiya Madhya Vidyalaya for formation of its Shiksha Samittee. The respondents have filed counter affidavit wherein it has been stated that the election was held and samittee was notified and therefore prayer of the petitioner had become 2 infructuous. The petitioner, in fact, had also sought to assail the election by impleading all those persons as respondent nos. 9 to 23 who are said to be elected members of the samittee. Remedy for the petitioner against the election held was by way of filing an appeal before the competent authority. In fact, when writ application was filed grievance was confined to not holding of the election. That being so, this writ application in view of stand taken by the respondents in the counter affidavit has become infructuous. As a matter of fact, life of the elected samittee has also come to an end and the government is contemplating new provisions for constituting siksha samittee. In that view of the matter, this writ application for all purposes has become academic if not infructuous. However, keeping in view that such samittee is in the process of formation, this Court would only observe that the steps for constitution of new samitee must be taken within a period of six months in the light of the policy to be framed by the State Government. With the aforementioned observation this application is disposed of. Abhay Kumar (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)