IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13805 of 2011 RAMBRIKSH MAHTO & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 12.05.2011 Petitioners being parents of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304B, 201/34 of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The accusation is of demand of dowry and for non-fulfilment of the same, life threats were being given. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that informant in the F.I.R. has not stated the date of marriage nor has explained the specific amount of demand as the marriage was performed more than seven years prior to the occurrence but in the F.I.R. the informant has stated that the victim had one children whereas in the protest petition the informant has stated that the victim had two children. Considering the fact that there is no specific accusation against the petitioners and husband is in custody, let the petitioners namely 1. Rambriksh Mahton 2. Sonawa Devi, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two 2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Barachatti(Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 208 of 2010. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)