IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16316 of 2004 MD.SANAULLAH, son of late Md. Hashim, resident of Rasulpur Jirwarah,P.S. Mahua, District Vaishali ….. Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur, 3. Additional Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur. 4. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Mahua, Disitrict Vaishali. 5. Sub Divisional Police Officer, Mahua, District Vaishali. 6. Anchal Adhikari, Mahua, District Vaishali 7. Officer-in-charge of Mahua Police Station District Vaishali …..Respondents Ist party 8. Lalbabu Rai son of Rama Rai, resident of village Rasulpur Jirwara, P.S. MahuaDistrict Vaishali 9. Devendra Rai, son of Baleshwar Rai, resident of village mansoorpur Mircha, P.S. Mahua, District Vaishali. 10.Chandranath Rai, son of late Bindeshwar Rai, resident of village Rasulpur Jirwara, P.S. Mahua, District Vaishali. 11.Nagina Rai, son of Ram Bharos Rai, resident of village Rasulpur Jirwara, P.S. Mahua, District Vaishali. 12.Parichhan Rai, son of late Jhagru Rai, resident of village Rasulpur Jirwara, P.S. Mahua,Disitrict Vaishali. 13.Mayalal Rai, son of jagdish Rai, resident of village Rasulpur Jirwara, P.S. Mahua, District Vaishali… Respondents 2nd Party. ----------- 3 27.04.2011 Mr. Raghunath Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner, submits that during the pendency of the writ petition grievance raised on behalf of the petitioner has been redressed by the authorities concerned. Mr. Satish Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of official respondents places reliance on the averments made in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondents Ist party and does not resist the prayer for withdrawal of the present writ petition. 2. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Rahman/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.) 2