[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.1785 OF 2008 Santosh Raghunath Kene ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Naveen Chomal Advocate for Applicant Ms.P.P.Shinde APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 10, 2008 DATE : JULY 10, 2008 DATE : JULY 10, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in CR No.I-97 of 2007 of Manpada Police Station, Dombivali. The said case is mainly under Section 302 of IPC. 3. The learned advocate for the applicant submitted that co-accused Arun Bhoir has been released on bail by this Court and the case of the applicant is similar to that of Arun Bhoir. This statement is not controverted by the prosecution. Hence, I am inclined to grant bail on the ground of [-2-] parity. 5. The applicant-Santosh Raghunath Kene to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rs.fifteen thousand only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. . After his release, the applicant/accused shall not remain within the jurisdiction of Thane District and he shall furnish his address to the Investigating Officer of this case. . The applicant/accused shall report at the closest police station to the address at which he will reside during the period that he is on bail. He shall attend said Police Station on last Monday of every month and he shall also attend Sessions Case at the concerned Court whenever so required. . The applicant/accused shall not influence the witnesses. 6. Application is disposed of. [-3-] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]