Crl. Misc. -M No. 15065 of 2011 -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. -M No. 15065 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.8.2011 Subedin ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Haryana ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present : Mr. R.S. Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal, J. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, who is in custody since January 2, 2011. The petitioner has been implicated on the statement of Nisar after his arrest. He was also not named in the FIR. The FIR was got registered on account of death of Nazma, by her father. Nisar is the cousin brother of deceased Nazma. In his disclosure statement during custody, he stated that after killing Nazma, Pajeb and Hansli worn by her were removed and kept by him for about 10 days. Thereafter, it was handed over to the petitioner for selling the same. These are the only allegations against the petitioner in the disclosure statement of Nisar. As even in terms of his disclosure statement, the petitioner was no- where in picture as far as murder of Nazma is concerned. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submitted that the petitioner being resident of the same village very well knew that some girl in his village had been murdered. Out of Hansli and Pajeb which were handed over to him, Hansli was sold by him to a jeweller whereas Pajeb was recovered from his possession. He cannot deny his involvement. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the disclosure statement of Nisar, in my opinion, the petitioner deserves the concession of bail pending trial. He is directed to be released Crl. Misc. -M No. 15065 of 2011 -2- on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate Mewat. The petition stands disposed of. ( Rajesh Bindal ) 17.8.2011 Judge Meenu