1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2006 IN IN IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.7 OF 2006 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.7 OF 2006 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.7 OF 2006 Vivek Chandanmal Jain ...Appellant Vivek Chandanmal Jain ...Appellant Vivek Chandanmal Jain ...Appellant Vs. Vs. Vs. Madhubala Vivek Jain & Ors. ...Respondents Madhubala Vivek Jain & Ors. ...Respondents Madhubala Vivek Jain & Ors. ...Respondents ----- ----- ----- Mr.N.D.Jaywant for the appellant Mr.N.D.Jaywant for the appellant Mr.N.D.Jaywant for the appellant Mr.Vijay D. Borwankar for Respondents Mr.Vijay D. Borwankar for Respondents Mr.Vijay D. Borwankar for Respondents CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATED: 24TH APRIL, 2006 DATED: 24TH APRIL, 2006 DATED: 24TH APRIL, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. Grant of interim relief does not 1. Heard. Grant of interim relief does not 1. Heard. Grant of interim relief does not arise. The application therefore dismissed. However, arise. The application therefore dismissed. However, arise. The application therefore dismissed. However, hearing of the Family Court Appeal No.7 of 2006 is hearing of the Family Court Appeal No.7 of 2006 is hearing of the Family Court Appeal No.7 of 2006 is expedited. expedited. expedited. 2. The application stand disposed of. 2. The application stand disposed of. 2. The application stand disposed of. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.) (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.) (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.)