1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 1145 OF 2002 Iqbal Mohammed Memon ...Petitioner Versus Competent Authority under the Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, & Ors. ...Respondents WITH CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 1146 OF 2002 Hajra Iqbal Memon ...Petitioner Versus Competent Authority under the Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, & Anr. ...Respondents Mrs. A.M.Z. Ansari i/by M/s. S.K. Shrivastav & Co. for the Petitioners Mr. R.F. Lambay for Union of India Mr. S.R. Shinde, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 2009 2 P.C.:­ There were several Writ Petitions filed. Some of them were decided by the Court against the petitioners in those cases. The petitioners went to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, by judgment dated 8th July, 2009, set aside the judgment of the High Court, and also the orders impugned in the Writ Petitions. It gave liberty to the respondents to proceed in the matter afresh. This liberty was to be exercised within the four corners of the judgment of the Supreme Court. The petitioners in these two petitions submit that their petitions were not decided at all by the High Court, and, therefore, they were not the subject­matter of the S.L.P. in the Supreme Court. Therefore, these matters are to be decided in the light of the judgment of the Supreme Court. 2. These facts have not been disputed by the other side, but the learned counsel for the other side submits that after the Supreme Court gave its judgment, this Court applied the judgment, irrespective of pendency of these petitions to the present petitioners as well, which, in other words, would mean that the 3 orders impugned in these petitions against the petitioners already stand revoked. Therefore, we need not pass any further orders. However, notices have been served on the petitioners in the light of the judgment of the Supreme Court. If the petitioners are aggrieved of those notices, they are at liberty to take any appropriate remedy which may be available to them in law, irrespective of the outcome of these Writ Petitions. These Writ Petitions stand disposed of. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J.