Q , §W)@ MC}9//©f‘ @ MADHYA Pi-b—xUbH STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL. JUH ABALP J3 A%LFUR 6 $ Jg7 6riginal Application No. APPLECANT: ‘R.S.Gauham son of Shi‘i Gendlal Gautam- aged about 51 years; Upper Bivision Teacher, Public Higher Secondary Schaol, Village & Post Tarra, Tehsil Patan Eistrict Burg (MP). ‘— Versus- RESPONDW TS : l. State of Madhya Pradesrm through The Secretary, Department of Education, State Secretagiate, Bhopal (MP) Commissioner, Department of Public Instructions EhOpal MP. 3. Joint Director, Public Education Education‘Division burg (MP) 4. President, Gram Shiksha Semity, Terra, 13.0. Tarra, Tehsil Patan, District Durga 5. R.P.Vecma son of Not known é . R.P.Swarnakar son of not known No §Mand6 boih Upper Division ”I’each‘ers, Public Higher 3econdar School; Village & Post Terra-r, Tehsil Pata'n District Burg. 7. President Selection Committee W? 6/0 Joint Director Public Education, Eéucation Divioion Burg. ALP. PPLICAHON UNB% 3E6T1 x: THE wrvumIsTmTIvxa mmumxu ac'rmroso. y A 0N o Sinha m W. WW. W am m man WW mafw Q M m mmmw WWW a: WinéwWW SB: Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mwhan Shrivastava, J. 10.03.2010 Shri Amrito Das, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents No. 1 ’85 3. Shri Keshav Gupta, counsel for the respondent No.6. This petition was filed against the recommendation dated 4. 1 . 1997 in the matter of prom )tion to the post of Lecturer. State/respondents have not filed any return. Learned counsel for the petitioner is also not in a position to say that the said recommendation was ever given effect to by issuance of any order of promotion. Be that as it may, if such recommendation has been given effect to and orders passed givtig promotion to person junior to the \ petitioner, petitioner shall be at liberty t0 challenge such order of promotion, if any passed. With the said liberty, the petition is finally disposed of. Sd/— Manindra Mohan Shrivastava"; Judge