IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.32896 of 2008 MINTU KUMAR PANDEY @ PINTU PANDEY Vrs. THE STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 11.09.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner, Mintu Kumar Pandey @ Pinti Pandey, is the elder brother of the husband of the deceased. Allegation is that daughter of the informant was killed by the first information report named accused persons for non- fulfillment of demand dowry. Counsel for the petitioner submits that false and fabricated first information report has been instituted by the informant who knows it quite well that his daughter expired in the clinic of Dr. Girish Chandra Singh due to acute gastric ulcer or intestinal obstruction. It has also been submitted that after investigation final form was submitted by the police, but, differing with the final form, cognizance has been taken by the Magistrate. 3. Considering the facts, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner is allowed. He is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case of his surrender before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten 2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Athmalgola P.S. Case No. 378 of 2006 to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )