1 (Spl.- H.C.A.S.C.D., 78- e) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA PANAJI, GOA. APPELLATE SIDE DISTRICT : MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3.31 OF 2005 IN W.P. 325/04 _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Quorum, appearances,Court's orders | Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders | _______________________________________________________________________ Mr D. Pangam, advocate for the applicant/original respondent no.2. Mr. Y. V. Nadkarni, advocate for respondent no.1/original petitioner. Mr.A.N.S. Nadkarni, Advocate General with Mr. N. Takkekar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondent no.2. CORAM : A. P. LAVANDE & N.A. BRITTO, JJ. DATE : 19 th January, 2005. P.C. Heard Mr. Pangam, the learned counsel on behalf of the 2 applicant, who was respondent no.2 in Writ Petition No.325 of 2004 and which Writ Petiton was disposed of by this Court by Order dated 28th September, 2004. 2. Upon objection having been taken by Mr. Nadkarni, learned Advocate General regarding the maintainability of this application, with reference to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Brahm Datt Sharma & Anr., ( [1987] 2 SCC 179). Mr. Pangam, the learned advocate for the applicant, upon taking instructions from the applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the application with liberty to file appropriate proceedings at the 3 appropriate stage. 3. Leave granted. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn. A. P. LAVANDE, J. N.A. BRITTO, J. mc.