IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4922 of 2006 Date of Decision: September 24, 2010 Manmohan Lal …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, D.A.G., Haryana, for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Jaswant Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Petitioner has invoked revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the order dated 19.04.2006 passed by learned Civil Judge C.R. 4922 of 2006 (Senior Division), Hisar, whereby, application moved by the plaintiff – petitioner under Order 23 Rule 1 C.P.C. seeking permission to withdraw the suit with liberty to file fresh one, was dismissed. Learned Trial Court in the impugned order has observed that suit is sought to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh suit after incorporating certain pleadings, which were not taken in the plaint initially. Learned Trial Court has further observed that no suit can be permitted to be withdrawn to file fresh after incorporating certain pleadings, which were not taken initially. Learned Trial Court further observed that suit can be permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh suit only when formal defects were pointed out. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that omission to take pleading in the plaint cannot be said to be a formal defect. In my view, Trial Court has committed no illegality or jurisdictional error while passing the impugned order. Petition is devoid of merit, hence, is dismissed. However, it will be open to the plaintiff to move amendment application, which shall be decided by the Trial Court in accordance with law. September 24, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2 C.R. 4922 of 2006 3