THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.7017 of 2009 Dated 27th July, 2011 Between: M/s.Padmalaya Telefilms Limited …Petitioner And Regional P.F.Commissioner (PD), Regional Office, 3-4-763, Bhavishanidhi Bhavan, Barkatpura, Hyderabad and another …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri D.Sunil Kumar For Sri G.Vidya Sagar Counsel for respondents: Sri R.N.Reddy The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue direction or order or writ one in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the show cause notices No.AP/29778/PDRC No.32/08/09, dated 17.02.2009 issued to two directors of the petitioner company to show cause as to why warrant of arrest should not be issued are illegal, arbitrary and unjust and also declare the order No.AP/29778/P.D.Cell/RO/Hyd/2007/143 dated 15.05.2007 passed by respondent No.1 is in violation of principles of natural justice and hence illegal, arbitrary and unjust, in the interest of justice and equity.” At the hearing, Sri D.Sunil Kumar, learned counsel, representing Sri G.Vidya Sagar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, interim order, dated 02.04.2009, shall stand vacated and W.P.M.P.No.9172 of 2009 and W.V.M.P.No.3880 of 2010 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 27th July, 2011 VGB