IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44186 of 2009 KISHORI SINGH @ KISHORE SINGH, son of Chandra Singh, R/o village Bhojpur, P.S. Kadar Chouk, District Badayu (U.P.) …………. Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR … Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Jay Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. B.P Singh, A.P.P. ----- 4 01.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the first information report and no incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. It is stated that though he is in custody since 26.7.2009, he has not been put to any T.I. parade. Petitioner was arrested on the basis of suspicion only and allegedly he has given a self incriminating confessional statement before the police, which has got no evidentiary value. It is submitted that the petitioner has been granted bail in Tajpur P.S. Case No. 28 of 2008 as well as Goraul 2 P.S. Case No. 276 of 2006 by different orders passed by different Benches of this Court. Learned counsel for the State submitted that it is apparent from the case diary as well as the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner, he is also involved in two other cases, namely, Tajpur P.S. Case No. 28 of 2008 under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Goraul P.S. Case No. 276 of 2006 under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. However, surprisingly a report submitted by the Superintednent of Police, Muzaffarpur discloses that the petitioner is only involved in Maniari P.S. Case No. 10 of 2008, which is the present case. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, KISHORI SINGH @ KISHORE SINGH, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur (West) in connection with Maniari P.S. Case No. 10 of 2008, with a further 3 condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the petitioner. If, after his release in this case, the petitioner is again found implicated in similar nature of cases, then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)