1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.465 OF 2008 IN S.C. SUIT ST.NO. 682 OF 2008 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLIATION NO.544 OF 2008 Indamer Company Pvt. Ltd. .... Appellant Vs. Mumbai International Airport .... Respondents Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Mr. Shri Hari Aney, Senior Counsel a/w Ashutosh Gavnekar i/by Haresh Mehta for Appellant. Mr. Birendra Saraf, Abhijeet Marathe, Suraj Iyer i/by Wadia Gandy & Co. for respondent no.1 Mr. Mayur Shetty i/by M.V. Kini & Co. for respondent no. 2. Coram : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J Date : 10th September, 2008 P.C. 1. This appeal is preferred against refusal of ad- interim reliefs to the Appellant. 2. After advancing some arguments, Mr.Aney, Senior Counsel for the Appellant states that in view of construction of the wall, the appellant needs to amend the plaint and at this stage, the appellant would be satisfied if the trial Court is directed to hear and dispose off the Notice of Motion expeditiously. 2 2. Bombay City Civil Court is directed to hear and dispose off the Notice of Motion within a period of two months. With these directions, Appeal from Order is disposed of. 3. In view of the disposal of the Appeal from Order, the Civil Application does not survive. The same is accordingly disposed off. (SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA,J)