4.crn.2898-08 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2898 OF 2008 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.28342 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3407 OF 2008 Shri Mukesh Devaram Mandora. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra and 2 others. ..Respondents. .......................... Mr.R.V. Bhasin, Advocate i/b. M/s. Jalan Legal Asso. for the applicant. Mrs.M.P. Thakur, A.P.P., for the Respondent - State. .......................... CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 14th SEPTEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- 1. This application is filed seeking condonation of delay of more than 400 days. Although the petitioner claimed that there is delay of 36 days only, but the order which is sought to be reviewed was passed by this Court on 12th March, 2008. The ground of seeking condonation of delay is that the petitioner was engaged in getting 4.crn.2898-08 2 certain information from the Government and he was pursuing some administrative remedies. We fail to understand such course having been taken by the petitioner. The petitioner got admission stating that he belongs to Reserved Category. His certificate was sent for confirmation to the Caste Scrutiny Committee, which it held against him. He filed a Writ Petition in this Court which was dismissed on 12th March, 208. However, the Court gave a direction to the respondents to consider his case from Open merit category as he had already undergone part of the course. The respondents did not find that he was meritorious enough to get admission in Open category. Thereafter, the petitioner filed another Petition which was dismissed by this Court by order dated 25th June, 2008. Now, in the third round the petitioner wants to nullify both the judgments passed against him in earlier Petitions. The petitioner has not explained at all the delay of more than 400 days in his affidavit. Besides, the learned Counsel wants this Court to reappreciate the law as has been appreciated by this Court in earlier judgments which manifestly is not within the scope of this Court while exercising its power for review. If the petitioner is aggrieved by any of the judgments and/or both the judgments, he 4.crn.2898-08 3 can move to Supreme Court. Since, there is no reason given for condonation of delay, Civil Application is dismissed. [BILAL NAZKI,J.] [A.R.JOSHI,J.]