Civil Revision No. 6566 of 2010 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6566 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 8.10.2010 Gursajan Bedi .....Petitioner Versus Sandeep Bedi and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Vaneet Soni, Advocate, for the petitioner. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) The plaintiff is in revision aggrieved against the order passed by the learned trial Court on 17.8.2010, whereby defendant No.3 was permitted to file a fresh written statement. It is the case of defendant No.3 that his signatures were obtained on blank and printed papers, when he was in police custody and such papers have been used in filing of the written statement. The learned trial Court has allowed the application filed by defendant No.3 and permitted to file amended written statement, subject to payment of costs. I do not find any illegality in the impugned order passed by the learned trial Court. Defendant No.3 is required to prove that Civil Revision No. 6566 of 2010 (O&M) [2] earlier written statement was an involuntary written statement or is actuated by fraud or misrepresentation. It is on proof of such fact, the defendant would be entitled to rely upon his amended written statement allowed to be filed by the learned trial Court vide the order impugned in the present petition. Disposed of in the above terms. [ HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 8.10.2010 ds