IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17736 of 2010 MANI LAL YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence is that there is no eye witness and that he was not charge-sheeted under Sections 302 and 120B/34 of the Penal Code differing with which cognizance has been taken. Named co-accused with common allegations in the F.I.R. have been granted regular bail in Cr. Misc. Nos. 22863 of 2009 and 12531 of 2010. The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner is required to be considered on its own merits including grant of bail to co-accused, without being prejudiced by the present order. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)