IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25422 of 2011 Kumar Harendra @ Harendra Jee, son of Chandrika Prasad Sharma Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 3. 18.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 419, 420, 406, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner was posted as the Branch Manager, Madhya Bihar, Gramin Bank, Barahpur, Mokama, Patna in the year 2003 whereas the present First Information Report has been filed in the year 2006 complaining about certain irregularities having been committed by the Officials of Madhya Gramin Bank, Barh. During investigation, the house of one Shailendra Kumar was raided from where certain incriminating articles were found but none of them pertain to the documents of Barahpur Branch at Mokama where the petitioner was posted. However, in his confessional statement, he said he used to give commission to the petitioner but the statement has been given three years after the petitioner was transferred from that Branch. Considering the same, let the petitioner in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 2 477 of 2006, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)