IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.22043 of 2010 Date of decision: 10.12.2010 Maan Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. R.S. Manhas, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that special increments and terminal/retiral benefits were granted to the petitioner by the department. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that in releasing the payment to the petitioner, petitioner neither played any fraud nor made any misrepresentation, hence no recovery could be ordered from the petitioner after his retirement. On being asked Mr. Praveen Chander Goyal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepted notice on behalf of the respondents. Learned counsel for the parties fairly stated that present case is squarely covered by the judgment of Full Bench of this Court in the matter of Budh Ram Vs. State of Haryana & Ors., 2009(3) PLR 511, hence may be disposed of in the same terms. Present petition stands disposed of in terms of the judgment of the Full Bench in the case of Budh Ram (supra). (Alok Singh) Judge December 10, 2010 R.S.