THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5720 OF 2010 DT.10.03.2011 Between: Satya Sai Builders and another ……….Petitioners. Vs. B.Padmavathi and three others ……………..Respondents. O R D E R: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. None appeared for the respondents. This revision petition is filed by the petitioners under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking to assail the correctness of the order dated 29.10.2010 passed in Tr.O.P.No.2290 of 2009 in O.S.No.621 of 2009 on the file of II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, wherein the application filed by the petitioners herein under Section 24 C.P.C., for transfer of O.S.No.140 of 2007 pending on the file of XIII Junior Civil Judge-cum-I Additional Rent Control, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, to be tried along with O.S.No.621 of 2009 was dismissed on the sole ground that the reliefs claimed in both the suits are different and the trial has already been commenced in O.S.No.140 of 2007 and the suit in O.S.No.621 of 2009 is coming up for appearance. The facts of the case in brief are that the petitioners herein filed O.S.No.621 of 2009 on the file of II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Curt, Hyderabad, against the respondents herein for recovery of possession and other reliefs, whereas the first respondent filed another suit in O.S.No.140 of 2007 on the file of XIII Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Additional Rent Control, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, which was originally numbered as O.S.No.6428 of 2004 on the file of V Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, for perpetual injunction and the same is also pending. As the subject matter in both the suits is one and the same, the petitioners moved the transfer application. On hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and on perusing the material placed before this court, it is seen that parties to both the suits are one and the same and especially the subject matter is one and the same. Therefore, I am of the view that in order to avoid conflicting decisions, it would be just and necessary to dispose of both the suits by one and the same court. Hence, the revision petition is allowed and the order under revision passed in Tr.O.P.No.2290 of 2009 in O.S.No.621 of 2009, dated 29.10.2010 on the file of II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad is set aside. O.S.No.140 of 2007, which is pending on the of XIII Junior Civil Judge- cum-I Additional Rent Control, City Civil Court, Hyderabad is hereby transferred to II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad to be tried along with O.S.No.621 of 2009. No order as to costs. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J Dt.10.03.2011 tjs.