IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.214 of 2010 PROF.(DR.)YUDHISTHIR PD.PANDEY SON OF LATE BASUDEO NARAYAN PANDEY, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA – SHASTRI NAGAR, ROAD NO. 4, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT - MUNGER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER CUM- SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 2. THE COMMISSIONER CUM- SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIATE, PATNA. 4. THE TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR. 5. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 6. THE REGISTRAR, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 7. THE FINANCE OFFICER, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHGALPUR. 8. THE PRINCIPAL R.D. AND D.J. COLLEGE, MUNGER. ----------- 02. 06.01.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State as also the respondent – University. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the certain differences of arrears of pension on the revised scale as also the other arrears dues. It is submitted that petitioner retired from the post of University Professor on 28th of February 2003 from R.D. and D.J. College, Munger. It is further submitted that petitioner represented his grievance before the Registrar of the respondent – University but the same has not been considered as yet. 2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent- University submits that the claims of the petitioner as indicated in the writ application as also in the representation is not clear. However, in case petitioner files a fresh representation, the same shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his claims, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 6. In such view of the matter, in case such representation giving specific claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner as highlighted in the representation could be settled without delay and admitted dues along with statutory interest could also be paid to the petitioner.. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)