n c^' SINGLE BENGH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH Writ PetitionNo46^-3 of 2005 PETmONER: / / .^ Arvind Vaishnaw^ ..^ <&\ ^^^ ^ ...-,^c" S/o Krishna Kumar Vaishnaw, •^?' A9ed ayout 29 years, >>' .-» ^'^^ <y RESPONDENTS: .^\^t' '7.**' ^\'p..^:" Ward Member ofWard No.7, (Rajendra Ward, Mungeli), R/o ShankerWard, Patwapara, Mungeli, District: Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. - Versus - / 1. 4' '^ RECHIV^D/rCpPY ^'^' CLE K t>XG:BILASI'UR /2. kj-73. /4. /-5. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Deptt. of-Urban Admihistration, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. DireGtor, Urban Adminjstration, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Municipal Council, Mungeli, Through its Chief Munteipal Officer, Mungeli, District: Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council, Mungeli, District: Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. President, Myntoipal Council, Mungeli, District: Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. t26 VK'V".^ ,-&. WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF 1NDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITA(VRITS. DIRECTIONS ETC.. IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRTLOF UKENATURE The petitioner, above named, most respectfullybegstosubmit as under: - N^s' '-'•Wi^ ^Si: HIGH COURTOFCHHATTiSGARHATBlLASPUR WRfT PETITl6NNQ;46790F:20QSr Petitioner ReSDondents Versus ArvindVaishnav State of Chhattisgarh & others. WRITPETITIONUNDERARTICLE226i'2270FTHECONSTITUTIONOFINDlA (SB:Hon'bleMlr.SatishK,Agnihotrj,J4 Present:- Shrt Sudeep Agrawal on behalf of Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, Advocate for the petitiQner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent Np.1 & 2. ShriBhaskarPyasi,Advocat6fortherespondentNo.3&4. ShriR.S.Ratel,Aclvocatef6rthereSpondentNo.5 ORDERfORAU (Passed on29tl'dayof July,2010) 1.^? ^t-ear)ne!t3^c>unsel;appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission|bKtt1is^oy ^v<i'ithdraw this/petition 6n account ofthefact that relief as sought for in this petition has already beeri granted. Hence, nothingsuwivesfbradjudicationinthlsmatter. 2. Itisordered, as prayed for. 3. AGeorelingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become -infructuous. Sd/- satishK.Agmhotri ashok