IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No 624 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? JJJ 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO 1 to 5: No JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ -------------------------------------------------------------- MAHENDRABHAI NATHALAL SHAH Versus JANTA KIRANA STORES -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR KV SHELAT for Petitioner MR MB GANDHI for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE Date of decision: 22/09/1999 ORAL JUDGEMENT Admit. With consent of the learned advocates, the appeal is finally heard today. After hearing the concerned advocates, prima facie it appears that there is some confusion with regard to the directions shown in the sketch prepared by the Court Commissioner. Looking to the peculiar facts of the case, without going into the merits of the case, it would be just and proper to direct the trial court to dispose of the suit as soon as possible. Learned Advocates appearing for the parties have assured this court that the litigants and the advocates appearing before the trial court shall extend their full co-operation to the trial court so that the suit can be disposed of at an early date. In the circumstances, it is directed that the suit should be finally disposed of preferably before 31st December 1999. In view of the above observation, the appeal stands disposed of with no order as to costs. ____ (hn)