-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.6106 of 2003 Vinayak Mahadeo Kamble...Petitioner Versus Mrs.Shubhangi Vinayak Kamble & Anr..Respondents Mr.S.P. Thorat, for the Petitioner CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. REBELLO J. F.I. REBELLO J. F.I. REBELLO J. DATE DATE DATE : : : 12th January, 2005 P.C.: . Rule. Heard forthwith. The petitioner husband has filed the petition challenging the awarding of maintenance at the rate of Rs.1,200/- per month. It is the case of the petitioner that he has been depositing the said amount. The impugned order itself was passed on 30th November, 2000. From paragraph 10 of the judgment it appears that the Family Court recorded a finding that the salary of the petitioner is Rs.5,325/-. The petitioner has three other daughters, apart from his father, whom he has to look after. Considering that, to my mind, ends of justice would be met if the amount of maintenance is reduced to Rs.750/- per month effective from 1st February, 2005. It is made clear that the petitioner will not in respect of the amounts already paid claim any refund or adjustment from the respondent. 2. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)