1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Appli. No.255/2008 (Raju Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 08, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.R.S.Chundawat, for the petitioner. Mr.L.R.Upadhyay, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. From perusal of the order impugned, it appears that the petitioner is facing number of cases of similar nature. In the instant case, there is allegation of committing theft of motorcycle and the motorcycle was recovered from the petitioner. The petitioner is also facing similar case of committing theft of motorcycle and it appears that he is the motorcycle lifter by habit and in earlier occasions, whenever he was granted bail, he misused the same and repeated the offence of similar nature. In the circumstances, therefore, it is highly unsafe to release the petitioner on bail. The possibility cannot be ruled out that if the petitioner is released on bail, he would again 2 commit the offence of similar nature. The bail application filed by the petitioner under section 439 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-