IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.V.K.BALI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2006 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 W.A.No.1507 of 2003(A) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER IN R.P.702/2003 IN W.P.(C).NO.25772 OF 2003 DATED 03/09/2003. .................... APPELLANT: PETITIONERS IN THE WP(C):- ------------------------------------------------ 1. PRAMEELA JAYAPRAKSH, PRAKASH BHAVAN, LIONS COMPOUND, MUNDDAKKAL, KOLLAM 691 001. 2. N.JAYAPRAKASH, KAJU NUT PRODUCTS, (GPN CASHEW EXPORTING COMPANY), ASRAMAM, KOLLAM 691 002, RESIDING AT PRAKASH BHAVAN, LIONS COMPOUND,MUNDAKKAL,KOLLAM-691 001. BY ADV. SRI.B.SURESH KUMAR RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS IN THE WP(C) --------------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE LABOUR DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE LABOUR COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE (CASHEW), REPRESENTED BY THE STATE LBAOUR COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM. 5. KUNJUMON, SECRETARY,KTUC (8), KIZHAKKETHERUVU,KOTTARAKKARA. 6. BABY, SECRETARY CITU, KIZHAKKEETHERUVU, KOTTARAKKARA. 7. JOHNSON MATHEW, SECRETARY, AITUC,KIZHAKKETHERUVU, KOTTTARAKARA. 8. MURALI, SECRETARY, BMS, KIZHAKKETHEERUVU, KOTTARAKKARA. 9. SHAJI, SECRETARY INTUC, KIZHAKKETHERUVU, KOTTARAKKARA. R1 TO R4 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.R.SABU. R5, R7, R8 & R9 BY ADV.SRI.DILIP MOHAN SRI.ALEXANDER GEORGE THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/12/2006, ALONG WITH W.A. NO.1509 OF 2003 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.K.Bali,C.J. & S.Siri Jagan,J. --------------------------------------------------------- W.A.Nos.1507 of 2003-A & 1509 of 2003 & W.P.(C).Nos.25772 of 2003-R & 25812 of 2003-W -------------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 1st day of December, 2006 JUDGMENT V.K.Bali,C.J. (Oral) The present appeals are against orders dated 3.9.2003, which are interim orders. Learned counsel for the appellants says that not only the Writ Appeals, but the writ petitions itself be closed as infructuous. W.P.(C).Nos.25772 of 2003-R and 25812 of 2003-W filed by the appellants are closed as having become infructuous. The appeals would not, in that case, survive. V.K.Bali Chief Justice S.Siri Jagan Judge vku/-