1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 689 OF 2006 Vitthal Bapurao Bhosle & Ors. ... Appellants Vs. Smt. Mangal Ramesh Bhosle & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.Umesh R. Mankapure,Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. A.M.Kulkarni,Advocate, for the respondents CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 29th September, 2009. P.C. 1. The respondents had filed Regular Civil Suit No.111 of 1989 which was dismissed by the trial Court and the present appellants had filed Regular Civil Suit No.31 of 1988 which was decreed. Therefore, the present respondents had preferred Regular Civil Appeal no.159 of 2001 and Regular Civil Appeal No. 160 of 2001. Both the appeals came to be allowed and the suit filed by the respondents was decreed and the suit filed by the present appellant was dismissed by the 1st appellate Court. Against that, the present appellants preferred Second Appeal No.989 of 2006 and Second Appeal No.690 of 2006. 2. The learned Counsel for the parties concede that S.A. No.690 of 2 2006 was dismissed by this Court (Coram Mrs. Nishita Mhatre, J.) by order dated 17.8.2007. In view of this, the present Appeal which is not different from Appeal No.690 of 2006 will not survive. 3. Therefore, the present Appeal stands dismissed for the reasons recorded in the order dated 17.8.2007 in S.A. No.690 of 2006. 4. C.A. No.985 of 2006 does not survive as the Appeal itself is disposed of. Therefore, C.A. Stands disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)