IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.18954 of 2010 Dr.Satish Kumar Yadav & another Vs. State of Haryana & others Present: Mr.Balraj Singh Dhull, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioners have filed this writ petition only on the basis of apprehension that they are being replaced by another temporary arrangement. There is no material placed on record in this regard. The writ petition, therefore, at this stage is pre-mature. While this order was passed, the counsel has referred to an appointment letter to show that as per the condition, the services of the petitioners were liable to be terminated without notice at any time. Accordingly, counsel submits that this will be enough material to show that their services are likely to be terminated. This appreciation of the counsel is totally misconceived. This is a term and condition of their appointments. There is no material to show that the petitioners are being replaced by any temporary employee. Dismissed. November 01, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE