CLCON No. 342/2006 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, ACJ. This contempt petition under Section 12 of Contempt of Courts Act has been filed by the petitioner for summoning the opposite parties for willful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 24.02.2006 passed in Civil Writ Petition No. 865 (S/S) of 2004, Kallu Singh vs. State of Uttaranchal & others. Heard Sri Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. Bina Pandey, learned Standing Counsel (U.P.) for the respondents and perused the record. The relevant portion of impugned judgment reads as follow: “In view of the aforesaid, the respondents are directed to decide the representations dated 17.02.2004 & 21.06.2004 in accordance with law for providing retirement benefits etc. within a period of 6 weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.” Respondent no. 1 has filed supplementary affidavit and in paragraphs 2 & 3 of supplementary affidavit it has been stated that representation of petitioner was decided on the basis of departmental inquiry vide order dated 9.3.2007, which has been annexed as Annexure No. 1 to the affidavit of compliance. Since representation of petitioner has been considered and decided by the respondents, I do not find any justification to continue the contempt petition against the respondents. Accordingly, contempt petition is dismissed. Notices issued against the respondents are hereby discharged. (B.C.K., ACJ) 03.03.2009 SP