1 38caw2645-11 rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2645 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9854 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. ..... Mr. Vaibhav Mehta i/b. Mr. Sidharth Murarka for the applicants. ..... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 15, 2011. P.C.: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicants. Considering the nature of the impugned order, applicants cannot seek interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) in this Civil Application. Hence, prayer clause (b) is rejected. No priority can be given to the Writ Petition of the year 2010 when very old Writ Petitions of the senior citizens category from the year 1997 are pending. Looking to the nature of the impugned order, no case is made out for expediting the hearing of the Writ Petition. Application is rejected. 2 38caw2645-11 2. It will be open for the applicants to apply for interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) in the pending Appeal. (A.S.OKA, J.)