^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRIT PETITION f2271 N0. ^S~W OF 2009 PETITIONER Defendant no.l ,°> ^^ \>< o-^r ^ ..-»' y- .^^' '^-^' RESPONDENTS Plaintiff 'Ashwan Kumar, S/o Anandram, aged about 24 years, Caste Mahar, ^ R/o Village and Post Khapri, P.H. No. 1, Police Station and Tahsil Balod, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Devantinbai, widow of Govindram Mahar, aged about not known, R/o Village Khapri, Tahsil Balod, District Durg (C.G.) Through Special Power of Attorney Holder Ruplal, S/o Kanhaiya Mahar, R/o Vlllage Khapri, Tahsil Balod, District Durg (C.G.) 2. Bramharam,S/oNanduram Halba, aged about not known, R/o Village Khapri, Tahsil Balod, District Durg (C.G.) 3. Naib Tahsildar Balod/ District Durg (C.G.) ^ S.D.0. Balod, District Durg (C.G.) 7'. The Collector, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF.THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Defendant no.2 '^. ^-XI-HC—78 3TT^ ^T f^vlich TT^T ^H^T 9h^i<^ ?' ^^ ^ww^, ^ti1-(-i<i<o, (s«ni'<H^< *<M<»11 ^rHT^i ^^TPTf^PT, ^tll^'fl<o, W. / . (^Z^) ^4^"^/ff5 •"^ioo ^T^?T 'V^K (<4?^<^) ^RTTWTrf^T ^^\ S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Justice Prai 2-12-2010 No one appears for the F Shri Sameer Sahu, coun Shri R.R.Sinha, Panel No.3 to 5. The matter was passc representation on behalf of the No one appears for the p In the circumstance, thi Court but to dismiss the writ The writ petition is dismi) cr)l4l(<n<ifll TTm^rf ^f 'fe^t Tf^T^R ^^ffiw s^[ hant Kumar Mishra letitioner. ^el for respondent No.1. Lawyer for the State/respondents td over once in absence of any Ipetitioner. tetitioner evenin the second call. ^re is no other option left with the p^tition for want of prosecution. ^sed for want ofprosecution. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge