baa Sank / 3 E a l¥ N W é. Mr mumgram? Eamwa egg a . q Ego? gag wmmag m4mswmqwqwmm mmjommmEma Em adwm.«W mga, ma“A ‘0 mmo wga maaaqaEimim “Homo 40%“ :Ilnl gag?mam , W, Q24 awn. «mm ind“: 40%.: uama “33-x?qg gem”; Wmdga a? E? aowd “3mm W xi“? agdm m .3 mmma a? $33 g Em: 3i and?“awe 7 +§§m Emaaa§ mwqgwa @mangmnw acme awmx an 21% n12 $ £§§ Egg gig .www "ll"'l-Il'l.l. IJIII.I'l-;Ilulillliln'1' I'J’IIJI’UI'III' . § Shrivaetawa, i $Ee ,: Hon’bie $hri Manindm Marian .g‘ Iii—mm 0 When the matter was caueci for hearing, none appeared for the petitiener/s and the matter wag pawed over‘ Even in the second mund, none appears for the petitionevle. 9/Q La m rte 3tate. Earlier S.P.C. was iseued to the petitioner/5‘ Since no one appears far th made on his/their behalf, the petition TUmane e petitioner/s and no representation is s dismissed for want of proseoution. Sd/r _ ‘ Manihdra Méhén'SiifivaStava Judge ;