IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42031 of 2009 1. RAM KRIPAL MAHTO, SON OF CHULHAI MAHTO 2. SUKUMARIYA DEVI, WIFE OF RAM KRIPAL MAHTO, BOTH RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE AND P.S. RUNNISAIDPUR, DISTRICT SITAMARHI………………………………………….PETITIONERS VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR….OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2. 07.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The case is under sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioners are husband and wife. The allegation against them is of theft of certain household articles. The informant has himself stated that on being informed of the theft, he visited the house of the petitioners and found the articles and recovered the same from there, caught hold of these petitioners and took them to police station. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are neighbours and they have been falsely implicated in this case and they are in judicial custody since 23.08.2009. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this application is allowed. Let petitioners, namely, Ram Kripal Mahto and Sukumariya Devi, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) 2 each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No.267/09 with conditions as laid down in sub-section (3) of section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioners. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioners and take steps for their arrest. B.T (J. N. Singh, J.)