FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7134 OF 2008 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner relied on the pleading and the grounds in the petition and submitted that in the interest of justice, the petitioner may be allowed to cross examine the defendant by imposing some costs. Learned counsel for the respondent vehemently opposed the prayer and submitted that the reasons given by the trial court in support of its order clearly spells out that the plaintiff is making constant efforts to prolong the proceeding by not attending the dates fixed by the trail court for cross examination of the defendant. After hearing counsel for the petitioner and respondent and upon perusal of para 2 and 3 and more particularly para 4 of the impugned order, I feel that the court below has taken possible view. No interference is called for in writ jurisdiction. Writ petition is dismissed. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) Date:08.09.2009. rlj/