1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3237 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5797 OF 2008 Shankarrao S/o.Dagduji Kharatmal and others APPLICANTS VERSUS Narayanrao S/o.Dagduji Kharatmal and others RESPONDENTS Mr.D.A.Mane, holding for Mr.Milind Patil, advocate for applicants (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 02/07/2009 PER COURT : 1. By the present application, the applicants have prayed that as per the report of Bailiff, first respondent refused to accept the service. It is to be treated as respondent no.1 deemed to be served and to issue fresh notice on respondent no.2 on the given address as as per the bailiff report, he is not found on the given address. Considering these submissions across the bar, following is the order. Respondent no.1 to be served by RPAD. Issue fresh notice on respondent no.2 on the given address. Civil application stands disposed of in terms of above order. The notice returnable within 4 weeks, but on or before 04/08/2009. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) 2 khs/ca3237-09