1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Writ Petition No. 1722 of 2009 . Harishchandra S. Shrivandhankar .. Petitioner v/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.Murtaza M. Najmi for the Petitioner. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP for the State CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED : 13th November, 2009 P.C. : 1. We have heard Mr. Nazmi, learned Counsel for the petitioner. There is no doubt that for prayers (b) and (c) as set out in this petition, the petitioner has to at the first instance approach his employer, i.e. the Government of Maharashtra and thereafter move the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. So far as prayer clause (a) is concerned, a blanket direction is sought to pay adequate compensation to the petitioner and that too without brining on record any details of the circulars, resolutions or notifications issued by either the Government of Maharashtra or the 2 Government of India laying down the compensation amounts to the victims of the 26/11/2008 attack. It would be therefore appropriate for the petitioner to file a fresh petition on his claim for compensation by setting out all the details of his claim and by bringing on record the Government Circulars/ notifications or any other communications in writing. 2. Hence the petition is disposed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate proceeding. [R.Y.GANOO, J.] [B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.]