In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Criminal Misc. No.M-947 of 2010 ..... Date of decision:4.2.2010 Harjinder Kaur .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents .... Present: Mr. Ravinder Singh Bassi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shilesh Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State. ..... S.S. Saron, J. The petition has been filed for directing respondents No.1 to 3 to provide adequate protection to the life, liberty, dignity, and property of the petitioner as she apprehends danger from respondents No.4 to 7. A further prayer has been made for taking immediate action for arresting respondents No.5 to 7 in FIR No.213 dated 4.11.2009 registered at Police Station Samrala, Police District Khanna for the offences under Sections 376, 323, 324, 506 and 34 Indian Penal Code (`IPC' – for short). It is alleged by the petitioner that she was married to Baldev Singh (respondent No.5) who was not happy with the petitioner. He used to remain out of the house till odd hours and return during night. On account of this, the petitioner suffered depression. The allegations have been levelled by the petitioner that her father-in-law (respondent No.7) had a bad eye on her and had committed the offence of rape with her. A copy of the petition was given to the learned counsel for the Cr. Misc. No.M-947 of 2010 [2] State so as to enable him to get the Police file and seek instructions in the matter. The Police file has been produced. Besides, it is submitted by learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Avtar Singh, Police Station Samrala, Police District Khanna that the Deputy Superintendent of Police (Headquarters), Khanna has recommended for cancellation of the FIR. A report dated 28.11.2009 of the Deputy Superintendent of Police (Headquarters) has been shown. It is submitted that the report has been approved by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Police District Khanna on 7.12.2009. It is submitted that in view thereof a cancellation report is being prepared which would be filed after necessary approval of the Senior Superintendent of Police, Police District Khanna. In view of the aforesaid position, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. It is needless to mention that the petitioner, who is the complainant, would be entitled to file her objections to the cancellation report in accordance with law. February 4, 2010. (S.S. Saron) Judge *hsp*