IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH AUGUST 2011 / 2ND BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 22993 of 2011(Y) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ C.A.JAMEELA IBRAHIM, W/O.V.K.IBRAHIM, AGED 51 YEARS, ARABIC TEACHER, II VUP SCHOOL, MALIPPURAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM AT KAKKANAD-682 030. 4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VYPPIN, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 511. 5. THE MANAGER, II V U P SCHOOL, MALIPPURAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 511. 6. THE HEADMASTER, II V U P SCHOOL, MALIPPURAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 511. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.V.VIJULAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 22993 of 2011(Y) APPENDIX EXHIBIT P-1 : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.34948 OF 2004-T DT.8.07.2005 EXHIBIT P-2 : TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT) NO.287/07/G.EDN. OF THE GOVERNMENT DT.20.01.2007. EXHIBIT P-3 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 03.08.11. EXHIBIT P-4 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 03.08.2011. EXHIBIT P-5 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 6TH RESPONDENT 03.08.2011 TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE ln T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.22993 Of 2011-Y -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is an Arabic Teacher in the school managed by the 5th respondent. The grievance is regarding the non- consideration of the broken period of service for the eight years' higher grade. The petitioner has filed representations before the Assistant Educational Officer, Manager and the Headmaster, which are evidenced by Exhibits P3 to P5. 2. Evidently, the issue will have to be considered by the Assistant Educational Officer, the 4th respondent herein. There will be a direction to the 4th respondent to consider Exhibit P3 representation in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders and communicate the decision to the petitioner and the school authorities within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will forward a copy of the Writ Petition along with a copy of this judgment to the 4th respondent for compliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn