IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42512 of 2011 Bihari Prasad Kesari Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 14.12.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 483 and 486 of the Indian Penal Code and 63 of the Copyright Act. It is alleged that from shop of petitioner some duplicate parts of M/S. Lucus India Service Ltd., were seized. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that seizure list does not reflect signature of the petitioner or any workers of his shop hence, it can not be said that the seizure was made from the shop of the petitioner. Moreover, seizure list witnesses are residents of Kolkatta and employees of the informant who were deputed by M/S. Lucus Indian Services Ltd. Considering the inherent defect in the very seizure list which form basis of lodging of the case, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 481 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Araria, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)