IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.15694 OF 2010 Between: Smt. V.Lakshminarasamma. … Petitioner AND The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam and another. … Respondents This Court made the following: O R D E R : The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the inaction on the part of the respondents in considering her representation dated 10-03-2010 for regularizing her possession and executing a Conveyance Deed in her favour in respect of the property bearing House No.2-37 at Indiranagar in Survey No. 108, Chinagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam, as per the order dated 14-02-1997 in L.G.C.No.9 of 1990. 2. As per the said order dated 14-02-1997 passed in L.G.C.No.9 of 1990, the petitioner was required to pay compensation to the Government at the rate of Rs.180/- per square yard. This amount was admittedly paid by the petitioner on 03-05-1997 but the regularization sought by her did not materialize. It is her case that others who were similarly situated and were covered by identical orders in L.G.C.Nos.15/89, 17/89 and 60/89 were granted the benefit of regularization as directed, but she alone was singled out for discrimination and her representation dated 10-03- 2010 failed to evoke any response. Hence, this writ petition. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on the basis of written instructions, conceded that the petitioner was covered by the order dated 14-02-1997 passed in L.G.C.No.9 of 1990, which was similar to the orders in the other L.G.Cs consequent to which regularization had been undertaken and Conveyance Deeds were executed. She also stated that the petitioner had paid the amount of Rs.34,740/- on 03-05-1997 in accordance with the order in the L.G.C. She further stated that the authorities were yet to take a decision in the matter and that the same was also intimated to the petitioner. 4. Viewed thus, the writ petition is amenable to disposal directing the respondent authorities to expedite the process and pass necessary orders in favour of the petitioner as was done in the case of others similarly situated. This exercise shall be completed within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J Date:07-04-2011. kvs. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.15694 OF 2010 (Disposed of) APRIL 7TH, 2011 KVS