@ HON ‘ BLE S.B. Ml THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ‘AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. (MM / 2004} Bidyapati Mishra, S/o Late Shri Rudrapratap Mishra, ged about 47 years, Post— Assistant rade III R/o Vrmdavan Colony, PETITION ER: VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Ministry of Agricuiture, Horticulture Department, D.K.S. Buiiding, Ministry, Raipur C.G. 2. TheDirector, Department of Horticulture, Reena Apartment, First Floor, Pachmadi Naka, Raip‘Ur, C.G. 3. The Deputy Director, Department of Horticulture,. Jagdalpur, District Bastar, C.G. 42 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ?S Wm ‘ .“.w....Q.....£:.5..)........".x..L.l.l.. u D mm (Wu) a§wan $ “imam mmm mm @m $aimm SB HON’BLE $HR§ JU'S‘I‘ICE PR I'MNKER DEWAKER 19.8.2009 Shr‘i Alok Dewangan, cou 1 for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, RL. for t e State. Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 30.6.2009 (Annexure P/ 1) passe by the respondent No.1 by which the petitioner who is working Assistant Grade III has been transferred from the office of Deputy Director, Horticuiture, Jagdalpur, District Bastar to he office of Assistant Director, Horticulture, Kanker, district nker (CG), on administrative gound. Contention of the couns 1 for the petitioneris’that the petitioner is an Assistant Gra e iii and the seniority of the assistant Grade II] is maintained district Wise. He further submits that if the petitioner is forced t go and join in the transferred place, his seniority would be adv sely affected. Counsel for the State su its that let the petitioner make a suitable representation to the a thorities concerned which would be decided in accordance with 1 . To this proposition of the State counsel, counsel for the petition showed his agreement. However, he prays for an interim protec till the representation of the petitioner is decided by the auth ies concerned. Accordingly, the petition disposed of with a direction that if the petitioner makes a r esentation to the authorities concerned within a/period. of t days from the date of receipt of copy of this order;'the authoriti concerned shall decide the same Within a further period of three eks from the date of its receipt. Till then the order impugned shal be kept in abeyance so far as it relates to the petitioner. L ‘ Sd/- ~ Pritinker DiWaker 7 Judge n e s a b a e t n i o ‘t e r e e e