IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.33 of 2006 BIBI SARJUN NISA wife of Md.Shahabuddin, resident of Village Mirzapur Bardah, P.S.Mufassil, P.O. Dariyapur, Munsifi and District Munger ----Defendant---Respondent no.5----------Appellant Versus 1.MD.AMIR HAMZA son of late Sk.Yaqoob 2.Sk.Md.Jamaluddin son of late Sk.Shahamat 3.Md.Sadique son of late Sk.Md.Sharif All residents of village Mirzapur Bardah, P.S. Mofassil, P.O.Dariyapur, Munsifi and District Munger ----(Plaintiff---Appellant)---Respondent 1st Party 4.Md.Kamaluddin 5.Md.Mustafa Both sons of late Sk.Shahamat 6.Md.Alauddin son of late Sk.Yaqoob 7.Bibi Ruqaida Begum wife of late Md.Sharif 8.Bibi Rehana wife of Md.Aslam 9.Bibi Rizwana wife of Md.Sayeed All residents of village Mirzapur Bardah, P.S.Mufassil P.O.Dariyapur, Munsifi and District Munger 10.Sk.Panchu 11.Sk.Abdul Bari @ Sk.Abdul Barique Both sons of late Sk.Majeed 12.Md.Shamshad son of late Sk.Abdul Khalique All residents of village Iarari, P.S.Tarapur, P.O. Tarapur, Munsifi and District Munger (Defendant-----Respondent second party)-Respondents 2nd party 13.Md.Mahtab son of late Amiruddin 14.Bibi Sakina wife of Sk.Amiruddin 15.Md.Shahangeer son of late Md.Sk.Muhid 16.Md.Alam 17.Md.Waseem 18.Md.Parwez 19.Md.Nasim @ Gonga All sons of late Md.Aleemuddin 20.Bibi Sameedan Khatoon wife of late Sk.Aleemuddin, All residents of village Mirzapur Bardah, P.S.Mufassil P.O.Dariyapur, Munsifi and District Munger --(Defendant—Respondents) Formal party-Respondents 3nd set ----------- For the appellant :None For respondent nos.1 & 2:M/S Rajendra Narayan Kamal Kishore Jha ---- 18. 04.12.2009 No one appears for the appellant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 that after 2 obtaining an order of stay of the operation of the impugned judgment of the lower appellate court the appellant is only bent upon delaying the matter to the extent possible. It is further submitted that the respondent no.3 being the plaintiff in the suit is a necessary party and the order of appellate court being of remand the entire appeal will abate on account of not taking steps for substitution of all the heirs of deceased respondent no.3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court finds force in the submission of learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2. The appeal, therefore, cannot proceed further. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) Spal/