.^\9l t BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CC,G.) CIVIL REVISION N0.14% / 2006 APPLICANTS OBJECTORS ^ ^/ ^ 1. 2. Smt. Thagiya Bai, aged about 32 years, wife of Shri Khilawan Singh Sahu, resident of village Sarekha, Tah. Gunderdehi, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh). Suresh Kumar aged about 27 years, son of Shri Ganesh Ram Sahu, resident of village Sarekha, Tah. Gunderdehi, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS RESPONDENT APPLICANT RESPONDENT NON- APPLICANTS Harakh Ram, son of Gaid Singh Sinha, aged about 55 years, resident of village Bikhera, Tah. Gunderdehi, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) Idal Ram, aged about 52 years, son of Shri Prem Lal Narad, aged about 35 years, son of Shri Idal Ram Singh 4 Dan Singh, son of Shri Idal Rain Singh, 5. Santram aged about 29 years, son of Idal Ram Singh 6 Smt Jurhi Bai, wife of Idal Singh, All are resident of village Sarekha, Tah. Gunderdehi Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CIVLL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908 XI-HC-78 3TT^T^TfericF cWW^Tsb^icb ^: ^ •^ +11*<^II SbHT<^» 7^ '*{ww^,w^w\<o, {®ldl'U^< » C/? /tg/6£ W3: 200 ^TM5|t»»(^qY^CK^sT) 5^<TTW^cT3T[^T 28.10.2006 Shri N.S. Dhurandhar cour^se! for the applicants. tttis The applicants have filed ttliis order by which the property of executlon of the decree and the been rejected. Learned counset for the petition as the same is not maint| IJbertyto fiie appropriate proceedi|ias Accordingiy, the rsvision i1 above. As prayed certified copy o|f counsei for the applicants in c^ fumished byhim. <^i^?<n41vi ^i^^l*^te1(^t<Ri<-<;K ^3^^T3TT^T revision petition against the impugned the appiicants has been attached in ^bjection preferred by the applicants has at)plicants seeks to withdrav/ this revision ^inabie against the Impugned order, with avaiiable under the law. dismissed as v/ithdrawn with liberty as the impugned order be returned to the ^se authenticated copy of the same is Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.