1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION GUARDIANSHIP PETITION NO.12 OF 2008 WITH GUARDIANSHIP PETITION NO.13 OF 2008 Lalit Raichand Shah .. Petitioner Versus Hasumati Jayantilal Ghia & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Kavita Shah i/b. A.G.Shah for petitioner CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 7th January 2009. P.C. . The prayer in these petitions is to appoint second defendant as Guardian of defendant No.3 minor. 2. An attempt to serve the petition was made but finding that the service could not be effected, leave to serve the same by substitute mode was sought, which was granted. Thus, the substituted service was permitted and the 2 petitioner’s Advocate has filed affidavit of service evidencing that the notice of these petitions was published, pasted at a conspicuous place on High Court Notice Board so also the packets containing the same were sent by UCP. Thus, the service is complete. 3. From a perusal of these petitions, I am satisfied that the same deserve to be made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). They are accordingly, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Affidavit proving service is taken on record. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)