IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 22995 of 2011 Date of decision December 12, 2011 Simran Kaur and others ....... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. PBS Goraya, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners would be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-12) which has been addressed to the second respondent is considered in the light of the decision taken by this Court (Annexure P-7) and appropriate orders be issued on the basis of the representation. 2. As ordered. 3. The second respondent shall consider the representation (Annexure P-12) in the light of the decision taken by this Court (Annexure P-7)and take appropriate decision as per law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. 4. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 12 , 2011 archana