THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No :2471 of 2008 DATED:08-02-2008 BETWEEN: Melapati Sriramulu & another. ..... PETITIONERS AND The Government of A.P., Rep., by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent. 2. Petitioners seek a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not disposing of the proceedings filed by the petitioners under C.No.9957/Assn,4(2)/04-1, dated 03-04-2004, in spite of a clear direction to the respondent to dispose of the same by this Court vide W.P.No.8868 of 2004, dated 15-04-2004, as illegal, and arbitrary. 3. It is the case of the petitioners that earlier they have filed W.P.No.8868 of 2004 on the file of this Court to declare the action of the respondent herein in not passing any interim order in the stay application filed along with the main appeal in proceedings C.No.9957/Assn-4 (2)/04-1, dated 03-04-2004, as illegal, and arbitrary, and the same was disposed of by order, dated 15-06-2004, directing the respondent herein to pass appropriate orders on the interim stay petition filed along with the appeal, dated 03-04-2004, as expeditiously as possible within a period of two weeks from the date of the order. It is stated that the stay application is still pending. 4. I am not inclined to express any opinion whether the main appeal is pending or not. It is not stated against which order the said appeal has been filed. Petitioner has not given any particulars of the resumption orders said to have been passed by the Mandal Revenue Officer, Madanapalli and the Sub-Collector, so also the Joint Collector. Without giving any particulars petitioner simply filed this Writ Petition stating that the appeal is still pending. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case as to whether the appeal is maintainable or not, respondents are directed to verify and dispose of the appeal, pending if any, without any undue delay. 6. Accordingly, Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J 08th February, 2008. Tsy