IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-27363 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: September 28, 2011 Rajdeep Kaur & another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Vivek K. Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. None for the private respondents. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that police officials had summoned the private respondents. The said respondents, having come to know about the marriage of the petitioners, have stated that they shall not threaten the petitioners or cause any harm to them. Crl. Misc. No. M-27363 of 2011 [2] 2. Learned counsel contends that let this petition be disposed of as not pressed. 3. Disposed of as not pressed. 4. It is made clear that in case the petitioners feel any serious threat from the private respondents in context of their love marriage, they shall be at liberty to approach the Incharge of the concerned police station who shall ensure protection of the petitioners. (AJAI LAMBA) September 28, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?