Lsp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7390 of 2007 Shri Laxman Vyankatesh Naidu ...Petitioner V/s. Madhukar Shriram Shinde ...Respondents A.P.Vanarase for the petitioner. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. DATED DATED DATED : 6TH JANUARY, 2009 : 6TH JANUARY, 2009 : 6TH JANUARY, 2009 P.C. . Heard Counsel for the petitioner. In my view the relief claimed in the application moved by the petitioner before the Appellate Court during the pendency of the appeal is ill-conceived. For, the decree of eviction passed against the petitioner is on the ground of bonafide requirement. The issue raised that amount deposited by the petitioner entitles him for adjustment has no relevance to the said proceedings. 2. Realising this position, Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner be granted liberty for pursuing remedy for adjustment of the amount paid by the petitioner as per the lease agreement dated 5th November, 1984. Needless to observe that it will be open to the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy in that behalf, if so advised which obviously will have to 2 be decided on its own merits in accordance with law. Petition disposed of on the above terms. [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.] [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.] [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.]