IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-11264 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:25.07.2011 Prahlad . . .Petitioner Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.K.B. Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sagar Deswal, AAG, Haryana. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This is a petition for bail in a pending trial case registered vide FIR No.93 dated 15.02.2011 under Sections 326/120B of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) at Police Station Ambala Cantt. District Ambala. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had thrown acid on the face of the complainant on her refusal to marry him. The complainant has been examined. She has categorically stated that after throwing acid on her face, the petitioner had also threatened her of dire consequences in case he is named. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is falsely implicated in this case because the prosecutrix was already married and the petitioner would have been the last person to go after her. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State/respondent has submitted that the complainant was married to one Brajesh but has been divorced. It is further submitted that the petitioner has committed a heinous offence as a result of which the whole life of the complainant has been spoiled. It is also stated that the case is now fixed for 18.8.2011 for evidence of the prosecution. After taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find it to be a case for bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JULY 25, 2011 JUDGE Vivek