CRA/1431/1999 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 1431 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA ============================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ============================================================== SANTOKBEN WD/O NATWARLAL V MADHAV - Applicant(s) Versus NARMADABEN KEVALBHAI PATEL & 6 - Opponent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : MR. DAKSHESH MEHTA, for M/S.VYAS ASSOCIATES for Petitioner No(s).: 1. MR AB MUNSHI for Respondent No(s).: 1,2. RULE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent No(s).: 3. MR SHITAL R PATEL for Respondent No(s).: 4. RULE UNSERVED for Respondent No(s).: 5. RULE SERVED for Respondent No(s).: 6,7. ======================================================= CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA Date : 26/07/2005 CRA/1431/1999 2/2 JUDGMENT ORAL JUDGMENT Mr. Dakshesh Mehta,learned advocate for M/s Vyas Associates, learned advocate of the petitioner, upon instructions received from the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition since the parties have amicably settled the matter outside the Court. Mr. A.B.Munshi, learned advocate of respondent Nos. 1 and 2, who are the contesting parties, has no objection if leave as prayed for is granted. Hence, leave to withdraw the petition is granted. Petition stands disposed of as it is withdrawn, with no order as to costs. Rule is discharged. (A.M.Kapadia,J) Jayanti*