1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. C.A.Z.No.677 of 2011 in L.P.A.No.298 of 2011 in Writ Petition No.4815 of 2009 (D) (Udaybhan s/o. Dhanuji Atram .vs. Hon'ble Member, Industrial Court & Ors.) _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Mrs.G.Venkatraman, Adv. for appellant/applicant. Mr.A.Parihar, A.G.P. for Resp.No.1. Mr.V.G.Palshikar, Adv. for Resp.Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 04, 2011. On 21.7.2011 this Court has specifically observed that the Industrial Court has to proceed to hear the Counsel for the parties and that too, on material available on record. It is, therefore, obvious that such an effort to usher new material cannot be countenanced at this stage. Hence, with liberty to the petitioner to challenge adverse order passed by the Industrial Court after Complaint (ULP) No.341 of 2006 is finally decided, present application is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE jais