Civil Revision No.3388 of 2009 [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Civil Revision No.3388 of 2009 (O&M) Decided on : June 03, 2009 Paramjit Singh and another ... Petitioners VERSUS Surinder Kaur ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Arvind Kashyap, Advocate for the petitioners. A.N.JINDAL, J.- On 15.5.2009, Surender Kaur - plaintiff/respondent (PW2) (herein referred as `the respondent') was recalled for further cross- examination. During the cross-examination, a question was put by counsel for the defendants – petitioners (herein referred as `the petitioners') to the respondent, as to `whether defendants gave reply of Ex.D1 to her Advocate Sushil Kumar and husband Santokh Singh?'. It was objected to by the counsel for the respondent on the ground that reply to this question had already come on record, which objection was allowed. Heard. The Trial Court has allowed the objection and restrained the counsel for the petitioners from putting the aforesaid question regarding Civil Revision No.3388 of 2009 [ 2 ] reply of Ex.D1 to the Advocate and husband of the respondent, on the ground that this question already stands answered. Moreover, the evidence of the petitioners is yet to commence and they may lead evidence to prove their pleadings. No grounds to interfere are made out. Dismissed. June 03, 2009 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE