1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1974 OF 2006 Prakash Shah ... Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner, Mumbai Mun. Corporation of Gr.Mumbai and anr. ... Respondents Mr.H.V. Kode for Petitioner. Mrs. P.A. Purandhare for Respondents. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : 28TH JULY, 2006 DATE : 28TH JULY, 2006 DATE : 28TH JULY, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the Parties. . The Respondents have issued notice under Section 53 of the M.R.T.P. Act against the Petitioner for breach of condition of permission to carry out repairs. By earlier order of this court, the learned Vacation Judge has directed the Respondents to consider representation and dispose it of. That is still pending. The Petitioner has now moved by way of Chamber summons to challenge the notice issued against him. . On behalf of the Respondents, it is pointed out that the representation by the Petitioner is made to the Authority other than the authority which is 2 competent to pass an order of regularisation. Considering that the Petitioners’ chamber summons is disposed of with a direction to the Petitioner to submit his representation to the Executive Engineer, Building Proposal Department within seven days from today. On such proposal being received, the said officer to consider the same and dispose it of according to law not later than four weeks thereafter. In the meantime, respondents not to act on the notice of demolition issued against the Petitioner. . With the above observations, Petition and chamber summons disposed of. (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.)