1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3874/2004 Chet Ram & Anr. vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : - 10.7.2007 HON'BLE MR.PRAKASH TATIA,J. Mr. SP Sharma,for the petitioner. Mr. Rameshwar Dave, Dy. GA. Mr. Rameshwar Chouhan, for the respondent no.2. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has challenged the order of the Tehsildar (Revenue) Raisinghnagar dated 11th Sept., 2000. Initially, the petitioner challenged the vires of some provisions of the Act also. The Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 22nd Sept., 2004 sent the matter back to the single bench as some other grounds are also there. It is clear from the documents placed on record itself that the petitioner was given notice by the competent authority in recovery proceedings but the petitioner did not appear and did not raise any objection. The matter remain pending before the competent authority upto 16th June, 2004, which is apparently clear from the Annex.3, the copies of the order-sheets placed on record by the petitioner from the recovery proceedings file. This Court is not inclined to entertain such belated objection of the petitioner which petitioner did not choose to raise before the 2 competent authority and has filed the writ petition after more than two years from the date of impugned order. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner may be permitted to submit representation before the respondent bank, who may consider petitioner's proposal for settlement. The writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed with permission to the petitioner to submit the proposal to the respondent bank and the respondent may consider the petitioner's proposal strictly in accordance with their norms and if the petitioner is found entitled to any relief within the norms then the respondent may settle the matter at their discretion. However, it is made clear that dismissal of this writ petition will not influence the negotiation proceedings before the bank. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-