THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA C.R.P.No.5300 of 2009 Date : 13-11-2009 Between : Karreddula Venkata Subba Reddy .. Petitioner And Maccha Pullanna .. Respondent THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA C.R.P.No.5300 of 2009 ORDER: 1. Heard Sri P.Nagender Reddy, the learned Counsel representing the petitioner. 2. Sri Nagender Reddy, the learned Counsel representing the Revision petitioner would maintain that the learned Junior Civil Judge, Banaganapalle totally erred in granting police aid for implementing the temporary injunction order granted by the Court. The Counsel also pointed out that the police registered FIR No.120/2007 and after conducting investigation filed final report stating that the said land does not belong to the plaintiff. Further, the learned Counsel would point out that it is the defendants who had raised the crop and he is in physical possession and hence in the facts and circumstances granting the police aid cannot be sustained. 3. The respondent in the Civil Revision Petition/petitioner/plaintiff filed I.A.No.936/2007 in O.S.No.135/2007 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Banaganapalle praying or grant of police aid for implementing the order of temporary injunction granted in I.A.No.494/2007 dated 3-10-2007. It is the case of the respondent/plaintiff that he filed a suit for permanent injunction and also filed I.A.No.494/2007 praying for temporary injunction and the said temporary injunction was granted. No doubt the registration of crime No.120/2007 also had been referred to and further it is stated that the Revision petitioner herein, the d in the suit, is not a law abiding citizen and he may use force and in order to protect his crop, it is stated that the respondent herein/plaintiff filed the said application praying for granting of police aid. 4. The application was resisted by filing counter wherein specific stand had been taken even after granting of temporary injunction he tried to encroach upon the property but was not successful and the police investigation and the result thereof also had been referred to. 5. The learned Junior Civil Judge, Banaganapalle formulated the following Point for consideration : Whether police aid be granted to implement the injunction orders against the respondent or his men or not ? The learned Judge recorded reasons in detail in paras 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 and ultimately allowed the application granting police aid for the purpose of implementing the order of temporary injunction referred to supra. The learned Judge also referred to the relevant decisions and in the light of the convincing reasons recorded by the learned Judge, this Court is satisfied that the order under challenge does not suffer from any illegality whatsoever. 6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition shall stand dismissed. But however, let the learned Junior Civil Judge, Banaganapalle make an endeavour to dispose of the suit itself at an early date. ______________________ Justice P.S. Narayana Date : 13-11-2009 AM