IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1527 of 2005 RAM KRISHNA SAHU aged about 62 years, son of Late Mahavir Sahu, resident of Mohall Bank Colony, Keshrinagar, P.S. Patliputra, district Patna. Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELEC.BOARD, through its Chairman, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna-1 2. The Secretary Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 3. The Financial Controller, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna-1 ----------- 3 30.11.2009 Mr. Ajay Kumar chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. V.K. Verma, J.C. to Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, learned counsel for the Bihar State Electricity Board are present. The writ petitioner had filed this writ petition for payment of his retiral benefits having retired from the services of the Board with effect from 30.11.2000 from the post of Additional Assistant Electrical Engineer. A counter affidavit has been filed in the proceeding and in paragraph 5 thereof the detail of the dues paid to the petitioner has been mentioned. Having regard to the statement made in the counter affidavit as to the payment of the admitted retiral dues of the petitioner, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending. 2 The writ petition is thus disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file a representation if so advised, as regards any disputed amount of the retiral dues paid to him. Needless to say that if any such representation is received by the respondent No.3, the Financial Controller within four weeks from today and the claim put forth by the petitioner is found justified then the same should be paid to him within three months therefrom and if the claim is not found justified the same should be rejected by a speaking order. The writ petition is disposed of with the direction aforesaid. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J. )