IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH JULY 2011 / 5TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20459 of 2011(F) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- ASINA.M.S., W/O. NIZAR, MULLAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, KAREEKODE, THODUPUZHA,IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN-685 585. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENTOF IRRIGATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PIN-695 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, HEAD WORKS SUB DIVISION, PEECHI, THRISSUR.PIN-680 653. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.20459/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE LEASE DEED DATED 8/8/2010 EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER AND THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P2 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 28/6/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P3 COPY OF THE TENDER NOTICE DATED 18/7/2011 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No. 20459 OF 2011 ------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 27th DAY OF JULY, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner participated in a tender for running cool drinks stall at Peechi Garden under the 2nd respondent. The period of contract is expiring on 08-08-2011. Pointing out various reasons petitioner submitted Ext.P2 request for extension of the contract period. That was not considered by the 2nd respondent who has issued Ext.P3 inviting fresh tender for running the above stall. Aggrieved by the above petitioner filed the writ petition. 2. In my view petitioner has no right whatsoever to seek extension of contract period even if there is substance in the allegation that during contract period he suffered loss. Therefore, the prayer as contained in Ext.P2 is unsustainable and hence, I am not inclined to direct the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P2. In view of the above this writ petition fails and accordingly the same is dismissed. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE AMG True copy P.A to Judge