Crl. Misc. No. M-38030 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-38030 of 2011 Date of Decision: December 21, 2011 Kala Ram @ Kalu Ram …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. S.K. Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner is father-in-law of Neeta Kumari deceased, who had died an unnatural death within seven years of her marriage. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the deceased died on account of electric shock. She had been staying separately. After hearing counsel for the petitioner at length, I do not find any ground to grant the concession of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner on the basis of the tentative defence plea which is raised by the petitioner in order to rebut the statutory presumption of guilt under Section 113 A of the Crl. Misc. No. M-38030 of 2011 [2] Evidence Act. The grounds pointed out by counsel for the petitioner may constitute a good ground for the grant of regular bail but no extraordinary exceptional circumstances exist to grant the concession of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. December 21, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE