CP/mgj“ 1. //,';,‘. I IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ' ’ AT BILASPUR w. P. (S) No. 317/6 or 2009 PETITIONER‘ Sunil Kumar Tiwari S/o Ravi Sharikar Tiwari Aged about 46 years, Presently posted as Upper Middle School Pangaon, Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipui" (C.G.) VERSUS ' RESPONDENTS z ./ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, (C.G.) / Division Teacher, Director, Public Instruction Now Commissioner, Public Instruction Department ‘ Chhattisgarh Raipur, 3, Distt.— Raipur(c.G.) / 3. A Lakra, Joint Director Public Education Department , 4. District Education Department Raipur, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Bilapur (C.G.) / 6. Block Development . Education Officer, Baloda Bazar, Raipur (C.G.) x ,7. Smt. R. Babra, Principal District Education and Training Institute, Raipur (C.G.) ,8. Nidhi Chibbar, Pension / w/o ~ vlmgH sHaéL ~ Bada Raipur (C.G.) .2. $< WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRITJ ORDER OR ORDERS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. XI-HC—78 “3W mmi/JP‘G) 33111% 200 a, p 'mwf‘awi’vx wmm ‘ mmméfwm %3f§mzmé¥t SE : HQN’BLE $HR! JUSTICH‘} PRETINKER DIWAKER 97.07.20G? Devendra Patel, counsel for Shn’ Sumesh Bajaj, G.A Challenge in the presex 1.11.2008 passed by the Cc Chhattisgarh whereby majo increments with cumulative e petitioner. Contention of counsel fc impugned order, the appeal petiticner on 5. 1.2G09 (Anne) pending befcre the Secretary, further submits that the petition can be disposed of by issuing a direction to the appeilate a Shri Man'mdra Shriv stava, Sr. Advocats with Shn' e petitioner. for the State. .t petitioner is to the order dated mmissioner, Public Instructions, r penalty of reduction in two t‘fect has been imposed upon the r the petitioner is that against the has already been flied by the :ure P/ 23) and the said appeal is School Education Department. He .uthority for deciding the pending appeal of the petitioner Within a stipulated timei‘rame. Learned counsel for the State has no objection if the said direction is issued. Considering the’facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed thattthe appeal preferred by the petitioner before the Secretaiy) School Department, be expeditiousiy preferably withir. a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. Educat on 1 decided ‘ mm k4 Q...BH Izooj WW (Wu) mmm",Z_ It is bemg made clsar t1? any opinion on merit of the ca, Hberty to decide the appeal strju &\ \ WWW WW émimm at this Coult has not expressed 5e and the authority would be at :tly in accordauce with law. With the above observat' on, the. petition stands disposed of. Sd/- 3, sPritinker Diwaker 1’” ‘ Judge >