IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47733 of 2008 INDU DEVI wife of Baleshwar Yadav @ Mohan Yadav, resident of village Pravinchak, P.S.Fatuha,District Patna,A/P. Rupaspur, P.S.Karay Parsurai, District Nalanda … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri Pramod Kumar For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta,APP ----------- 3. 3.2.2009 Heard. The case has been registered under Sections 304(B), 201, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that the accused persons including the present petitioner murdered the deceased Sunita Kumari who was married to Sanjeet Kumar in the year 2005 and it is admitted that she was married to the brother of the deceased Sunita Kumari. There is no definite allegation as to why the accused persons shall commit the murder of Sunita Kumari, but it is alleged that they did it and caused the dead body to disappear. During the course of argument, the contention was that admittedly there was no real motive for the commission of the offence 2 and the husband was admittedly working in Madras but he was also roped in the case by alleging that he was not attending to the miseries of the lady. The contention was further that the allegation of committing murder of the deceased does not get support from the subsequent statement of the informant. Learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor resisted the prayer for bail by citing the statement of Guddi Kumar who was the sister of the deceased and who, as per the F.I.R., had accompanied the present petitioner to the house of the husband. After being taken through that particular statement6 of the lady I do not find any direct material to say that the accused persons had really committed the murder and that she had seen it. The sister simply alleged that her sister was killed by the accused persons and so as to concealing the act the dead body was thrown into the flood water. The petitioner being the sister of the husband and being married to the full brother of the deceased, it is 3 the contention, could not have any reason to commit the murder. Let the above named petitioner, under the facts indicated above, be released on her furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda, in Hilsa(Karay Parsusrai) P.S.Case No. 345 of 2008. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)