THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1740 OF 2011 Dated: 29.07.2011 Between : J.S. Hari Prasad … Petitioner And 1. B. Vijaya Reddy ad 2 others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1740 OF 2011 ORDER : This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 11.03.2011 in I.A.No.286 of in O.S.No.220 of 1999 on the file of the Court of the VI-Additional Senior Civil Judge (FTC), Rangareddy District. The respondent No.1/ the plaintiff filed I.A.No.286 of 2010 under Order 8 Rule 9 of C.P.C. seeking permission to file the rejoinder to the written statements filed by the defendants 1 and 2. After hearing both the parties, the Court below by order dated 11.03.2011 allowed the said application observing that no prejudice would be caused to the defendants if the respondent/plaintiff is permitted to file the said rejoinders. Aggrieved by the said order, the defendant No.1 filed this Revision Petition. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the material available on record, I do not find any justifiable reason to hold that the order under Revision suffered from any error of fact or law apparent on the face of the record. A perusal of the order under Revision shows that the Court below on proper appreciation of the material available on record thought it fit to permit the plaintiff to file rejoinder. The discretion exercised by the Court n the facts and circumstances of the case cannot be termed ‘perverse’ and therefore the interference by this Court is not warranted on any ground whatsoever. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 29.07.2011 gbs