1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C. A. S. NOS. 92, 93, 94, & 95 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 139 OF 1999 Shivdas Devidas Manglekar & Ors. Vs. Kalidas Devidas Manglekar thr L.Rs. Rajan Kalikas Manglekar & Ors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. A. L. Deshpande Adv for appellants. CORAM: C. L. PANGARKAR J. DATED: 30 th APRIL , 2010. These applications have been filed for bringing legal representatives of appellants no. 2 and 4 who have died during the pendency of this appeal. It is stated by the learned counsel for the appellants that their heirs are reluctant to apply for their substitution as legal representatives of appellants 2 and 4 and join as appellants. Rest of the appellants have therefore filed these applications for adding 2 these heirs of appellants 2 and 4 as respondents in this appeal as their heirs. Applications for substitution however were not filed within the time. Appellants have also applied for setting aside abatement. For the reasons stated in the application all these four applications have been allowed. Legal representatives of appellants 2 and 4 be substituted as respondents in the appeal. JUDGE svk