IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.9.2009 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE K.SUGUNA W.P.NO. 16020 of 2009 N. Vedagiri ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengalpattu. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Kancheepuram. 3. The Special Commissioner & Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai.5. ...Respondents. Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the respondents in connection with the impugned orders passed by the respondent 1 and 2 in RC No. 4946/2006 B dated 1.10.2006 and RC No. A1/50225/2006, dated 20.1.2007 respectively and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr. K. Srinivasan - Not appeared For Respondents : Mr. R. Murali,Govt. Advocate O R D E R When the matter was called on 01.9.2009, there was no representation for the petitioner and therefore, it was ordered to be posted for dismissal. Even though the matter is listed today under the caption "for dismissal", there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for default. Consequently, M.P.Nos. 1 and 2 of 2009 are also dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar /True Copy/ Sub.Asst.Registrar ra https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengalpattu. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Kancheepuram. 3. The Special Commissioner & Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai.5. + 1 CC to Government Pleader,SR.44835 WP No. 16020 of 2009 SGL(CO) EM/1.10 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/