IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3091 of 2010 Mahendra Prasad Yadav, son of Sri Rasolal Yadav, resident of Mohalla Madhubani, P.O. and P.S. Purnea, District Purnea … Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Sri C.Ashok Bardhan, son of name not kown to this petitioner, at present working as the Commissioner cum Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. Sri C.Ashok Bardhan, son of name not known to this petitioner, working as Deputy Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4. Sri Suresh Prasad, son of name not known to this petitioner, at present working as the Additional Secretary, department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 5. Dr. N. Shrawan Kumar, son of name not known to this petitioner, presently working as District Magistrate, Purnea 6. Sri Prabhu Ram, son of not known to the petitioner, presently working as the Deputy Director, Chakbandi, Katihar 7. Sri Bhupendra Kumar Singh, son of not known to this petitioner, presently working as the Additional Collector, Purnea 8. Sri Ashok Kumar Jha, son of not known to this petitioner, presently working as Deputy Collector, District Establishment Purnea … Opp.Parties. ---------------------------------- 2. 29.9.2011 Having heard counsel for the parties and also taking into account the facts mentioned in the supplementary show cause filed today on behalf of the Collector of Purnea District, this Court is of the considered opinion that the direction given in the earlier order of this Court has not been complied as yet and only some efforts have been made by the Collector of Purnea district that too after this contempt application was listed for hearing. Though this Court was actually inclined to pass an order against the Collector of Purnea district Mr. Gupta learned Standing counsel appearing on his behalf would assure that the final order of absorption of the petitioner shall be positively issued within a period of three months from today. Such a stand however having been not taken by the 2 Collector of Purnea district in the show cause reply or even in the supplementary show cause reply, this Court can dispose of this contempt application only after recording the statement of Mr. Gupta as an undertaking on behalf of the Collector of the Purnea District for full and final compliance of the order of this Court. That being so, this application is disposed of with a clear direction to the Collector of Purnea District to ensure that the undertaking given by his counsel is complied in letter and spirit. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/