a 7 émaLE 8am 571’7a6/ N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASFUR 0% W. P. S NO. /2008 PETITIONERS z/l. Ishwari Prasad Rai S/oShri Moti Lal Rai aged about 52 Years Occupation—Sub- Engineer Inigation Depaltment R/o H—l9 hrigation Colony I.T.I. Rampur Korba District— Korba (C.G.), . Dwalika Prasad Dube S/o Shri Narayan Prasad Dube aged about 52 Years R/o Q.No. H/3. Irrigation Colony Dam Distn'ct- Korba (C.G.) ’ Shri Ram Vishwakarma S/o Shri Babaram Vishwakarma aged about S4 R/o H9 B ~ hrigation Colony Darri District— Korba (C.G.) . Poonam Chand Kalhar S/o Shri M.C. Kalhar aged about 53 Yeaf§ R/o C/o N.P. Chauhan RDA colony House No. 678 Tikrapara Raipur District— Raipul (C.G.) . Ratan Lal BoreWar S/o Late — Fakir Borewar aged about 52 Years R/o C/o Yogesh Sharda Shrinagar Khamtarai P.O. WRS colony Raipur (C.G.) . Md. Hanif Khan S/o Late- Md. Latif Khan R/o RDA Colony Tikrapara Raipur Distlict- Raipur (C G) (I 9% m 7. Gopal Knshnadam S/o Shn AC 5am aged about 49 years R/o Mlmmata Bango canal division no. 3 Sakti District— Janjgir—Champa (C-GJ leaeEaVED-VCGPY I N3 Sharmila Singhal M qahcnorGeneral High Com of Chhams VERSUS / RESPONDENTS :/1. The State of Chhattisgarh lhmugh the Qhiei §e0ret5fy 949§~ §Ui!ding, Kalpur (6.6.) ‘ 2. State of Madhya Pradesh Through the Chief Secretary Govemment ofMadhya Pradesh Bhopal. I 3. The'ChiefEngineer Inigation Department Amarkantak Bhawan Bhopal (M.P.) .14. Chief Engineer Inigation Department Sihawa Bhawan Civil Line Raipur (C.G.) /5. The Executive Engineer Hasdeo Barach Rampur Korba (C.G.) 6. Central Government (Union of India) through ~ Secretary Public Grievance, Khan Market New Delhi. WRIT PETITION-UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. I HIGH COURT CF CHHATTISGARH : BILA$PUR WW1" PE?iT§ON (S3 NO.5086 OF 2008 PETWONERS ishwari Prasad Ra§ & Others Versus RESPONDENTS The State of ChhaiiiSgarh & Others (Writ Petiiicn under Articie 226 of the Consiitutéon of §nd§a) ‘ Sing£e Bemh : Horrble Shri Satish K. Agniho’arL J. Presené :- Ms Renu Kochar, ceunsei for €he pefitioners. Shri MP3. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate f0: the State of CG. Ms Fouzia Mirza, Asstt. Soiicitar Genera§ far the Union of Endiairespondem Nc.6. QRnER (QRAL; (Passed en this 18*“ day of January, 201 a) Learned counsei appearing for the petmoners, on instmctions, submits that the petitioners do not want to press other reiiers, as Sought for rn the present petition, hewever, the petitioners may be permitted to make fresh representations to the Union of tndia to consider their cases for aiiocaticn to State of Madhya Predesh in accordance with haw. 2} Learned counsei appearing for the Union of india submits that in the event, the petitioners make representatione, the same wiii be considered and decided. in accordance with law anti on its ewn merits within a period of eight weeks from the date oi receipt of the representations. 3) in View of foregoing, according to the teamed counsei appearing for the netitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4} Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of. / J T, Swish K- Agdmowixi judge Gowri