IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM THURSDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2010 / 27TH JYAISTHA 1932 LA.App..No. 417 of 2009() ------------------------- LAR.70/2005 of SUB COURT,THODUPUZHA .................... APPELLANT(S): CLAIMANT ---------------------- PRABHAKARAN NAIR,AGED 59 YEARS, S/O.KESAVAN NAIR,PRABHAKARAMANDIRATHIL, KOLANI P.O.,THODUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT: --------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,IDUKKI. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LATHA T.THANKAPPAN THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/06/2010, ALONG WITH LAA NO. 645 OF 2009 AND CONNECTED CASES THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ L.A.A.Nos. 417,645,674,748,OF 2009 & L.A.A. NOs. 298 & 347/2010 ------------------------ Dated this the 17h day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. All these appeals are preferred by the claimants whose lands in Thodupuzha village were acquired for the purpose of construction of Kolani - Vengalloor Bye pass. The acquisition covered by L.A.A. Nos.417/2009, 748/2009, 674/2009 and 645/2009 were pursuant to Section 4 (1) notification published on 12/6/2002. For the lands involved in those cases, which were dry lands, the Land Acquisition Officer awarded land value at the rate of Rs.19,512/- only per Are. The Reference Court in those cases by a common judgment would refix the land value at the rate of Rs.57,733/- per Are. The lands involved in other two appeals (L.A.A. Nos.298/2010 & 347/2010) were also situated in the same village and the acquisition was for the same purpose. However, those acquisitions were on the basis of a notification issued two and half years after the notification in the earlier cases. For the lands in those cases, the Land Acquisition Officer awarded value at the rate of Rs.25366/- per L.A.A..No.417/2009 & others 2 Are. The Reference Court, relying on the common judgment which is impugned in the first four cases, would refix the market value of land at Rs.75,055/- per Are. 2. In these appeals, the claimants have raised identical grounds contending that the market value redetermined by the Reference Court under the two common judgments is grossly inadequate. Mr.K.K.Chandran Pillai, learned counsel for the appellants, addressed arguments before us based on the grounds in the appeal memoranda. According to Mr.Pillai, having regard to the judgments delivered by this Court in various other cases pertaining to acquisition of land in Thodupuzha village pursuant to earlier notification, even the claim in the appeal, which is at the rate of Rs.86450/- per Are in the first four cases and at the rate of Rs.1,23,500/- per Are in the next two cases, is very low. 3. All the submissions of Mr.Chandran Pillai were opposed by Smt.Latha T.Thankappan, learned senior Government Pleader for the respondent. According to her, the learned Subordinate Judge has fixed the market value on the basis of the evidence which was available on record. L.A.A..No.417/2009 & others 3 4. Having considered the rival submissions addressed at the Bar and having kept in mind various earlier decisions of this court including the decision in State of Kerala v. Jose Simon (2009 (1) KLT 76) pertaining to acquisition of dry land in Thodupuzha village at earlier points of time, we feel that there is justification for allowing all these appeals completely. Hence, we refix the value of lands involved in L.A.A. Nos.417/2009, 748/2008, 674/2009 & 645/2009 at Rs.86,450/- per Are. Similarly, we refix the value of lands involved in L.A.A. Nos.298/2010 & 347/2010 at Rs.1,23,500/- per Are. All the appeals are allowed as above. It is needless to mention that the the appellants/claimants will be entitled for all statutory benefits admissible under Section 23(2), 23(1A) and Section 28 of the Act on the total enhanced compensation to which they become eligible by virtue of this refixation. The parties are directed to suffer their respective costs in the appeals. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM , JUDGE dpk