1 mgj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Suit No. 2608 of 2008 with Notice of Motion No.3043 of 2008 Idea Cellular Limited ..Plaintiff vs. Lenovo (India) Private Limited ..Defendant Mr. Vivek A.Vashi i/b Bharucha and Partners for plaintiff. Mr.Rahul Kadam i/b Anand and Anand for defendant. CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA J. 10th July, 2009 P.C. 1 This suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking a restraint order against the defendant from in any manner using or advertising in relation to any business or goods or services of the defendant, the trademarks Ideapad or IdeaCentre or the mark/word Idea by itself or in combination with any other word(s) or expression(s) or 2 with any suffix or prefix or any variants thereof or any other mark deceptively similar to the plaintiffs Idea marks registered as trade marks so as to (i) infringe the plaintiffs marks and/or (ii) pass off or enable others to pass off the defendant s goods or services or business as those of the plaintiff or in some way connected or associated with the plaintiff. 2 The parties have today tendered the consent terms dated 10th July, 2009 whereunder they have settled all their disputes pertaining to the said mark. The consent terms are signed by the Company Secretary of the plaintiff Company, the Company Secretary of the defendant Company and the Advocates for the plaintiff and the defendant respectively. The said consent terms are taken on record and marked X for identification. The Company Secretaries of the plaintiff as well as defendant are 3 present in Court and they have informed the Court that they have signed the consent terms of their own free will and volition and there is no force fraud or coercion involved. In view thereof, the suit is decreed in terms of the consent terms X . Refund of court fees as per rules. 3 In view thereof the Notice of Motion No.3043 of 2008 also stands disposed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.)