IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Misc.No.17821-22-CII of 2009 and Civil Revision No.403 of 2003 (O&M) Date of Decision 09.11.2009 National Insurance Company Limited ...... Petitioner VERSUS Sahab Singh and others ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.K.S.Dhanora, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL): Civil Misc.No.17821-22-CII On the grounds, mentioned in the application, petition is restored to its original number. C.Ms. Stand allowed. Civil Revision No.403 of 2003 This petition is directed against the order dated 21.05.2002, passed by Permanent Lok Adalat of this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per impugned order, passed by permanent Lok Adalat of this High Court, the matter was kept open in case Insurance Company does not agree. I have also gone through the order. Relevant part of the order is reproduced as under:- “Counsel for the appellants agrees to the proposed order. Two months' time is allowed to the Insurance Company to give concurrence and pay the amount, otherwise, the High Court Civil Misc.No.17821-22-CII of 2009 and Civil Revision No.403 of 2003 (O&M) -2- may be moved for disposal of the appeal on merits according to law.” The intent and purport of the order is that it was based on consent of the counsel and anticipated consent of the Company but the Company did not give any consent to this order. I do not agree that such order could be challenged by way of revision petition whereas the Company was at liberty to move the application for disposal of the appeal on merits. Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to move the application to get the appeal decided on merits. Request is allowed. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 09.11.2009 mamta-II