IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 28528 of 2010 Rajeev Kumar @ Rajiv Kumar, S/o Shri Sateesh Kumar. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Sweta Sony, D/o Shri Shyam Bihari Prasad. ---------------------------------- 09. 29.09.2011 The petitioner had sought anticipatory bail which was provisionally allowed by order dated 26.03.2011 and the Opposite Party No. 2 had been noticed to settle the dispute but unfortunately the matter could not be settled. Now the petitioner undertakes that he will pay Rs. 3,000/- per month to his wife subject to any modification by the Family Court as an interim arrangement for her upkeep. In view of such, let the petitioner’s provisional bail granted is hereby confirmed to the satisfaction of SDJM, Saran at Chapra in connection with Complaint Case No. 317/2009 (Tr. No. 2416 of 2010) subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit Rs. 3,000/- (Three Thousand Rupees) per month in the court below firstly within 15 days of confirmation of his bail and subsequently by 15th every month which the wife of the petitioner will be at liberty to withdraw without prejudice the right of the parties. In case, he fails to do so on two consecutive dates his bail shall stand automatically cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)