IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8051 of 2009 VINOD MAHTO, S/o Kashi Mahto Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 08.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This court is not satisfied with the submission made on behalf of the petitioner by filing an unreliable paper of ownership showing purchase of the motorcycle in the name of his father from Guddu Kumar Yadav, who had purchased the same from Subhash Yadav, in absence of having no original paper from the Agency. Thus, I find it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the application is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)