1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.15799 of 2011 PERIYASAMY ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs STATE REP. BY THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, CRIME NO.1042 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. SANTHANAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 406 and 420 I.P.C in Crime No.1042 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and seeks anticipatory bail. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the allegation of selling the sheeps which were entrusted to him for grassing to the tune of Rs.1,72,000/-. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the allegation of selling sheeps, which were entrusted to him for grassing. He further submitted that the investigation is pending. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is constrained to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Natham, on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police every day at 5.30 p.m. for a period of four weeks and thereafter he shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NATHAM. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL. 3. THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. SANTHANAM Advocate SR. No.44416 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15799 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 RJ/21.12.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/