IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 771 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 05/02/2009 in WP NO : 8958 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 B.Kishan Lal (Died) per L.Rs. B.Ravindranath Yadav, S/o.late B.Kishan Lal R/o.15-5-257, Osman Shahi, Opp: TRC Bus Depot, Gowliguda, Hyderabad. 2 B.Rajendralal Yadav S/o.late B.Kishan Lal R/o.15-5-257, Osman Shahi, Opp: TRC Bus Depot, Gowliguda, Hyderabad. 3 B.Dwarakalal Yadav S/o.late B.Kishan Lal R/o.15-5-257, Osman Shahi, Opp: TRC Bus Depot, Gowliguda, Hyderabad. 4 B.Navlal Yadav S/o.late B.Kishan Lal R/o.15-5-257, Osman Shahi, Opp: TRC Bus Depot, Gowliguda, Hyderabad. ..... APPELLANTS AND 1 Smt.Gondi Anjuamma W/o.Late Gondi ramaiah @ Ram Reddy R/o.H.No.4-58/1, Budhanagar, Near Uppal Bus Depot, Uppal, R.R. District. 2 Smt.Parupalli Balamani W/o.Mohan Reddy D/o.late Gondi ramaiah @ Ram Reddy R/o.Peddagudem Village, Pochampalli Mandal, Nalgonda District. 3 Smt.Papireddy Swaroopa W/o.Sai Reddy D/o.late Gondi Ramaiah @ Ram Reddy R/o.Narapally Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, R.R. District. 4 Smt.Guntuka Renuka, W/o. Thirupathi Reddy, D/o.Late Gondi Ramaiah @ Ram Reddy, R/o.H.No.4-58/1, Budhanagar, Near Uppal Bus Depot, Uppal, R.R. District. 5 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 6 The Special Grade Deputy Collector-cum-Revenue Divisional Officer, East Division, Ranga Reddy District, Malakunta, Goshamahal, Hyderabad. 7 The Tahsildar, Uppal Mandal, Uppal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants: MR.V.TULASI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 771 of 2009 ORAL JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) When the matter has come up for hearing, learned counsel for the appellants sought permission of the Court to withdraw the writ appeal with liberty to the appellants to raise all the objections raised in this appeal before the revisional authority. While reserving such liberty to the appellants, the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ___________________ T.MEENA KUMARI,J Date: 2nd July, 2009 _________________ SANJAY KUMAR,J pnb