IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR sCHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION Noiléé'OF 2002 Ram Raian Yadav S/o L¢LS¢:I A _ aged 38 years, Occupation. Secretary Gram Panchayat Bitkuli, Post..Be1tara, Tahsil & Distt.Bi1aspur(CG) PETITIONER VERSUS W % :e RESPoNDENTs jeafState of Chhattis‘garh through Secretary, I Department Qf Panchayat ‘ D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur. 2. Chief Executive Officer, ' ; Janpad Panchayat,Bilha District. Bilaspur (C;G) 3. Surpanch Gram Panchayat Bitkuli Post. Bilha,‘ Tahsil & Distt.Bilaspur(CG) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22%F‘ TIE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA : FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT m THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT:OR WRITstoRDER OR ORDERS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. 7 “” : @ v ’ XI-HGZZ w? No: 1G€:/;§BL m . $3 § ‘Ka ‘ mm o5/WWW r L *WW Shri Manindra Shxivastava, qounsel for the petitioner. 8111i Ranbir Singh, GA for tht; State. Heald It is the case of the petitioner that he was appoi%1;ad’ as Secmtaxy (Panchayat Karmi) of Gmm Panchayat, Bitkuli on ‘ 23/ 10/ 1998 and continued to ,dislachaxge his dutie’sv‘tm 1st July, 2001 whereafter due to urinary track infection, he was not able to attend his duties. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, after recovering &om the illness the petiti‘ioner went to resume his dut'es and submitted his joining o 07/ 11] 2001 along Wlth the medical certincate, but he was evented from doing so. Since no orders have been pass on his application, the petitioner has approached this C In the above View of the , the Court is of the r e for relief. m r o i opinion that no useful purpose w ‘ i ‘ the petition pending as it can be d passing appropriate orders. Accord' o mac—22 mam. WWWmW§f§Q°IW< W. §133ii$2Gl§n r" 31W mmmw < , I 1 P. > éqmam disposed“ of by dimming the r‘espondént no.3 \to take appropriate action and pass orders on petitioner’s application (Annexure P/ 3) within a reasonable period, from Ehe communication Wof this order. %< wk“ ‘ It is made clear that the Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits Of the petitioner’s contention and this order is noti'to be construed as on: directing the respondent no.3 p‘to take the petitioner on duty. A decision has to be taken on its own merits and in accordance with law. Consequently, I.A.No.4734] gOOZ for impleading the i necessary palty in the anay of respondents in the cause title stands disposed of. . Certified copy as per rules. l i I