IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26957 of 2008 PAPPU PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 08/08/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. Altogether five persons are named as accused. The petitioner is one of them. The case has been registered under sections 302, 201 and some other sections of the Indian Penal Code on the allegation that the informant’s father had gone to his relative along with Balister Mishra but did not return. The informant came to know that he has left the house with Ajay Pandey and on inquiry Ajay Pandey told that the informant’s father left the house on 4.12.2005. The informant’s father was having illicit relation with the wife of Ajay Pandey and on account of that there was scuffle between the informant’s father and others. Submission is that there is no eye witness to the occurrence. The petitioner had nothing to do with the deceased and nothing has come against him except the suspicion. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Pappu Pandey is directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Gopalganj in connection with Kuchaikote P.S. Case No. 136 of 2005. avin. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)