IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.347 of 2009 BABY DEVI @ BABY KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 04. 08.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The order on the writ petition was to dispose the representation only by the concerned respondent. The last paragraph of the order noticed the discretion of respondent no.2 in the matter. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation was submitted to the District Magistrate, but has been disposed by the District Programme Officer. Respondent no.2 in the writ petition was the Secretary, Social Welfare. In the entirety of the matter and the nature of the order, this Court finds it difficult to interfere with any orders passed on the representation in the contempt jurisdiction. If so advised, the remedy of the petitioner lies in a fresh writ application. The contempt proceedings stands disposed. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)