1 ABA 6-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6 OF 2011 1. Ramesh/Baka Dattu Bangre ..Applicants 2. Vikas Vijay Esame V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7 OF 2011 Tushar S. Bangre ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.Sachin B. Chandan i/b. Mr.G.T.Wankhede, Advocate, for the Applicants Mrs.P.H.Kantharia, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 14TH JANUARY, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. The applicants in these two applications, seek anticipatory bail as they apprehend arrest in connection with C.R.No.I-175 of 2011 for the offence 2 ABA 6-2011 punishable under Sections 333, 353, 452, 143, 147, 149, 504 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Murbad Police Station, District Thane on the allegation that they had assaulted and caused injuries to police constable on duty at police outpost Teen Hath Naka Police Chowki under the jurisdiction of Murbad Police Station, District Thane. 3. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan has admitted one Nasir Karim Attar to anticipatory bail observing that his name did not appear in the FIR. The learned APP on instructions from the Complainant states that this Nasir Karim Attar is the same person as Nasir Shaikh referred to in the FIR and who had caused injury to the Complainant Police Constable. 4. Considering nature of allegations made in the FIR and though the learned APP has a very strong objection to admit these 3 ABA 6-2011 applicants to anticipatory bail, their being in the custody for the purpose of investigation may not be necessary. Therefore, in the event of their arrest, applicants be released on bail on their furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs.15,000/- each with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.15,000/- per person on the following conditions. (i) The applicants shall report at Murbad police station, District Thane for interrogation on 17th January, 2011 between 10.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. and thereafter, as and when required by the investigating officer. (ii) The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (iii) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. . The order will remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge sheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court 4 ABA 6-2011 dated 2nd December, 2010 delivered in Special Leave Petition (Cri.) No.7615 of 2009 (Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State of Maharashtra And Ors.). 5. Criminal Applications are disposed of. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)