IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8749 of 2008 BACHCHU MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 4. 18.8.2008 Heard. Even on the material as contained in paragraph 14 of the case diary, the Court is not inclined to direct release of the petitioner but when it was pointed out that the petitioner is in custody for twenty one months without the trial being taken up with all seriousness in a case under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, the Court directs the release of the petitioner on his furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura, in Sheikhpura P.S.Case No. 134 of 2001 subject to the following conditions: (1) That the petitioner shall report to the Officer-in-charge of Sheikhpura Police Station every week and that attendance shall be recorded by the Officer-in-charge of the said Police 2 Station, (2) The petitioner shall remain in attendance on all date or dates to be fixed by the court and no representation of the petitioner shall be allowed through his counsel unless the Court is satisfied about the genuineness of the reasons therefor. (3) Any attempt to sabotage the evidence or any report of indulging in such offence against the petitioner shall be sufficient for the court below to assume that this order has not been passed and it shall take all steps for remanding the petitioner to custody. Let a copy of this order be transmitted to the Superintendent of Police, Sheikhpura, for seeking compliance of the conditions as indicated above. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)