1 appw45.11 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.45 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1728 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra. ....Applicant. Vs. Halima Suleman Hakam. ....Respondent. Mr. J.P.Yagnik, APP for applicant-State. Mr. Ayaz Khan, advocate for respondent. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- JANUARY 28, 2011. P.C. 1. Not on board. Upon production taken on board. 2. Since the Respondent-State has already filed proceedings against the order of acquittal and the property involved in the offence, the appropriate course for the applicant-State is to move the concerned Court for interim relief, as may be advised. Since the time given in order dated 22nd December, 2010 is expiring on 3rd February, 2011, the applicant-State is free to take such steps, as may be advised. Application disposed of accordingly. (A.R.JOSHI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)