1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.8000 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 M.Meenal ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2. The Commissioner, Corporation of Madurai, Madurai. 3. The Sanitary Inspector, Madurai Corporation South Zone, Near Sundararajapuram Govt., Hospital, Madurai-11. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Madurai, Madurai District. 5. Mrs.P.Chinnammal ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No.2 to remove the unsanitary fittings and remove the rubbish and filth created by the respondent No.5 and consequently to remove the public nuisance by the respondent No.5 within the period of time. For Petitioner ... Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For Respondents ... Mr.M.Govindan Special Government Pleader for R.1 and R.4 Mr.M.Ravishankar, for R.2 Mr.D.Rajasekar, for R.5 ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent No.2 to remove the unsanitary fittings and remove the rubbish and filth created by the respondent No.5 and consequently to remove the public nuisance by the respondent No.5 within the period of time. 2. Heard Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents 1 and 4, Mr.M.Ravishankar, learned Counsel appearing for the second respondent and Mr.D.Rajasekar, learned Counsel appearing for the fifth respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The writ petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to remove the leaking sanitary fittings and the rubbish and filth created thereby. 5. Pursuant to a direction of this Court, Advocate Commissioner was appointed who submitted his report stating that the defects have been rectified and now there is no leakage, filth or rubbish. 6. The learned Counsel for the fifth respondent states that necessary steps will be taken to put up proper drainage to avoid any leakage in future. The petitioner has also accepted to co-operate for the effective maintenance of proper drainage. 7. In view of the above, no further order is required, this writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs. SD ASST REGISTRAR ( Records ) /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST REGISTRAR ssl To 1. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2. The Commissioner, Corporation of Madurai, Madurai. 3. The Sanitary Inspector, Madurai Corporation South Zone, Near Sundararajapuram Govt., Hospital, Madurai-11. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Madurai, Madurai District. 1CC TO MR. T. LAJAPATHI ROY, ADVOCATE, SR: 34258: DM::2011:OCTOBER:::18:: W.P.(MD)No.8000 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 29.09.2011 2P:6C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/