1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR W.P.No.985 of 2010 Avinash Vitthalrao Wadibhasme ..vs.. Vidarbha Premier Cooperative Housing Soc.Ltd. And ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JULY 30, 2010. After hearing the petitioner in person, this court on 4/3/2010 noted his contention that RRC was not served upon him. Thereafter on 22nd April, 2010 this court gave him time to engage Advocate. On 21/6/2010, he did not engage Advocate and stated that he was raising only one contention of non service of notice of RRC in the matter. Because of this, the court directed other side to produce records. Accordingly, records were produced on 6th June, 2010. The contention of Advocate Ghate, learned counsel for Society revealing the knowledge of proceedings to the petitioner was found correct from record. Thereafter, again time was given to the petitioner to engage Advocate. The matter was before this court on 22/7/2010. On that date because of his personal problem the petitioner sought adjournment and time till today was given. Today, petitioner has filed a pursis raising all contentions which show how he was harassed in service and how he was disabled from paying loan installments. Before that, he also filed an affidavit on 2 5/7/2010. The learned counsel for respondent no.1/Society states that he has not received the copy of other affidavit or pursis. The petitioner was sent notice of RRC proceedings on his address and he never informed creditor abut the change therein. In fact, it was pointed to this court that later notices were issued and served on same address. I am, therefore, not inclined to interfere in the writ jurisdiction. The petition is trying to abuse the process of the court. The writ petition is dismissed. No costs. JUDGE chute