IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION No.3073 of 2006. Chandulal Nagji Gala & Ors ..Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors .. Respondents. Mr Y. E. Mooman for the Petitioners. Mr G.W.Mattos, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4. Mr D.,H. Mehta with Ms Trupti Puranik for the respondent No.2. Mr Janak Dwarkadas, Sr. Advocate with Yadunath Chaudhary for Respondent No.5. Mr J. Reis with Kunal Cheema for the Respondent No.6. CORAM:DR.S. CORAM:DR.S. CORAM:DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN RADHAKRISHNAN RADHAKRISHNAN AND AND AND V.C. DAGA,JJ. V.C. DAGA,JJ. V.C. DAGA,JJ. DATED:13TH DATED:13TH DATED:13TH JUNE, 2007. JUNE, 2007. JUNE, 2007. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. We have perused affidavit of the Deputy Secretary dated 6th June, 2007. It appears that the Urban Development Department, Government of Maharashtra has formulated a new policy with regard to the cessed as well as non-cessed buildings in the redevelopment ( 2 ) proposal of the plot of land. 3. It is made clear that all the interested parties shall appear before the Hon’ble Chief Minister for personal hearing with regard to the dispute involved in the present petition on 20th of June, 2007 at 11.00 a.m. so as to enable the Hon’ble Chief Minister to fix a schedule of hearing and hear all the parties in the above matter in the light of the new policy framed, and pass a reasoned order and communicate the same to this Court within a period of two weeks from the date of hearing in the above matter. 4. It is made clear that the above direction has been given in view of the fact that the respondent no.6 could not appear before the Hon’ble Chief Minister on 11th day June, 2007 in view of the paucity of time. 5. Till the decision of the Hon’ble Chief Minister, statement given by the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 to continue. ( 3 ) 6. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. (V.C. (V.C. (V.C. DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.) (DR.S. (DR.S. (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)