R.S.A. No. 697 of 2005 -1- *** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A. No. 697 of 2005 Date of decision: 7.8.2007 Kulwant Singh ...Appellant Versus Kuldip Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. R.S.Saini, Advocate and Mr. M.S.Gill, Advocate for the appellant. Mr Premjit Kalia, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. **** RAJESH BINDAL, J. This is defendant's second appeal against the judgment and decrees passed by both the Courts below concurrently deciding the issues against the present appellant. Both the Courts below found that the property owned by MulaSingh (deceased) was his ancestral property and all the family members were entitled to equal share therein. It was further found that sale made by Mula Singh during his life time was not for legal necessity or for the welfare of the family. In this factual matrix, it was held that the family members would be entitled to their shares in the property, which consists of four sons, two daughters and mother, now deceased. All the four sons have been given equal share of the property after holding the same to be ancestral. Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to point out any discrepancy in the findings recorded by the Courts below regarding the property being ancestral and the sale of the property in their favour being not for any legal necessity or the welfare of the family. R.S.A. No. 697 of 2005 -2- *** Keeping in view these facts, I do not find any justification to interfere with the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the courts below especially when the property had been equally divided amongst four sons. It is a dispute between the brothers and sisters. It is otherwise also in the interest of cordial relationship between the family members that the litigation comes to an end. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. August 7,2007 (Rajesh Bindal)) Pka Judge