(^T 1<^$7/— IN THE HI^H COURT OF JU&ICATURE ^T BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (c) N0, <^30^ OF 2009 PETITIONER /^ohd. Aamir, son of AAohd. Asqar, aqed about 20 years, resident of K.K. ftoad, AAaudhapara, Ralpur (CS) Vs RESPON&ENTS ^..i(...^^'^\ ?..^^—^ ^•^^a' 1. Chhattisgarh Vivekanand University, ftegistrar Swami Technical throuah sts Bhitai, District ^8(S. (, Dura. ( ' . • 2,New ©overnment Engmeerjng Colleae. throuah Its PrinciDal, Old Dhamtari Road,, Sejbahar, Raisur (C6} PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 3Tr^r'^r 1^fN'3Tr^T s?h^ ^f^a Tumane 3%r -^ii^id-4, ^Til^i^, rc«vii^i< _^...P.-...CCJ.h?..:.fc.l&^ ^w^ ^TW^IWNI^ 200 ^sv^s' 3?n^i'^<TTS[R ^f^T SB^: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Moh^n Shrivastava, J. 15-03-2011 Shri Vaibhav Shukla, couns^ None appears on behalf o1| round. Heard. This petition was filed by refusal on the part of respondent N( petitioner in the subject Fluid Mechc Learned counsel for the pet| pendency of the petition, the pet| supplementary examination, which his studies. In that view of the matter, 1 questions involved in the present right to revaluation or not. However to be taken on the petitioner on that to revive the petition. The petition is accordingly infructuous. ^RfeFflFT ^PToTf ^ ft^ ^f^R '^3^F[3Tl^T for the petitioner. the respondents, even in the second ie petitioner aggrieved on account of ).1 to revaluate the answer sheet of the inics-1 and Mechanics of Solids. ;ioner however submits that during the itioner was allowed to appear in the Ihe cleared and thereafter, he pursuing ^m not inclined to go into the academic ;ase as to whether the petitioner had in case, any adverse action is sought 1 basis, the petitioner would be at liberty |dismissed as having been rendered Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge S5 [^ -^feq