s.s.^s^ ^' ?H-^; ...H MliLt: y£:nuU(O ©SNWi- C ^ i y^" IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G) W.P. fS) N0. 2^3 /2007 PETITIONER /-'' ^ <i ^^ -^^ RESPONDENTS 1 r0€ii .<^-r^I^ ^^^ ['' ^f- 2 r/ U6^u"^ o< Smt. Vimla Bhandari Agedabout 41 Years, W/o. Shri ChandraKumar Assistant Teacher, Aadim Jati Kalyan Vibhag Kanya Aashram Ghotia Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director Public Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Bemetara District Bemetara (C.G.) The Collector Tribal Welfare Department Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA HI6H COURT OF W^ATnSSAW AT BILASPUR W. P.fS) No. 299 of 2007 Petitioner ; Smt. Vimla Bhandari Versus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh and others And W. P.(S\ No. 300 of 2007 Petitioner ; Eshwari Lat Syare j Versus Responden+s ; State of Chhattisgarh and others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J f'resen-t: Mr. Bharat Lal Dentbra, Adwcate for -the petitioners. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Poaie! lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on this 19 t)ay of Jonuary, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for -rtie State/respondents jointly submit that the facts of the prssenl writ petition is similar to that of in W. P. (S) No. 6884/2006 (Bhikham Singh Sinha vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others), which was disposed of vide order dated 12.12.2006. They further submit -•tf'iat -the question of iaw involved is also the same. ; 2. In view of the above-stated submissions made by learrted ceunsel for tiie parties, these writ petitions are diq)o%d of in terms ofthe order dated 12.12.2006 passed by this Court in W. P. (5) No. 6884/2006 (Bhikham 5ingh Sinha vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be ptaced on record in other connected writ sd/- SatishK-Agnihotn Judge Thakur