IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 1ST OCTOBER 2007 / 9TH ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 29079 of 2007(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ L.WILSON, AVIKUZHI VEEDU, OLATHANNI, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) SRI.S.SUJIN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE NEYYATTINKARA MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST. 2. THE SECRETARY, NEYYATTINKARA MUNICIPALITY NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST. 3. THE CHAIRPERSON, NEYYATTINKARA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, NEYYATTINKARA MUNICIPALITY, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT., LOCAL SELF GOVT. DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R4 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.J.MOHAMMED ANZAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. .......................................................... W.P.(C)No.29079 OF 2007 ........................................................... DATED THIS THE 1ST OCTOBER, 2007 J U D G M E N T Heard Sri.N.N.Sugunapalan, Senior Counsel for the petitioner for admission. The orders under challenge in this Writ Petition are Exts.P1 and P3. But I find that Exts.P1 and P3 are appealable orders under the statute. I dispose of the Writ Petition relegating the petitioner to statutory remedies by way of appeal. However, there will be a direction to the 1st respondent-Municipality not to implement Exts.P1 and P3 for a period of one month from today. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) tgl WP(C)N0. -2- WP(C)N0. -3-