1 wp 3014.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3014 OF 2011 Mhasu Baburao Bhokre & others .. Petitioners Versus Vithal Pundlik Dange .. Respondent Shri S. D. Kulkarni, Advocate for Petitioners. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 15TH JUNE, 2011. PER COURT : . The petitioners challenge the order dated 22.10.2010 thereby rejecting the application of framing the issue of jurisdiction as a preliminary issue. Shri Kulkarni, the learned counsel submits that the issue of jurisdiction goes to the root of the matter and same should have been decided as preliminary issue. According to the learned counsel, the order passed by the Government authority is under challenge. As such, the Civil Judge Senior Division will have the jurisdiction. 2. The matter is ripe for evidence. The scheme of Order XIV 2 wp 3014.11 of the C. P. C. lays down that all issues are to be decided together. As now the matter is ripe for evidence, I do not see any error in the order thereby rejecting the application. In view of that, the writ petition being sans merit is dismissed, however, with no order as to costs. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/June 11