C^f. Ci- °JJ^ ^.^^^kl g^3%3; iW;i®:SS^! IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^, .1 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^vO^- ^^y WRIT PETITION (S) N0...^..'..r..../201: ^ Vijay Lal Dhruw, S/o Late Jhagluram Dhruw, Aged about 53 years, R/o. Ward No. 4, Aaniapara, Chowki, Tahsil- Chowki, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.), VERSUS : 1. r Distriet Co-operative Central Bank Limited, Through:- Chief Executive Officer, District Co-operative Central Bank Limited, G.E. Road, , Rajnandgaon, (C.G.) ...•-•-c^"\y.^ ^'^^' ..->" ^^ yy ^•-•' 2. Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1 B'^11 0 HiGH COURT QECHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR '. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) W.P.(S)No. 3758 of 2011 Vijay Lat Dhruw Respondents VERSUS District Co-operative Central Bank Limited and another Preserst: Shri R.S. Pats!, counsei fer the petitioner. Shri PKC. Tiwari, Sr. Advocate with Shri Shashi Bhushan, counsel forthe respondent No.1 . Shri YS. Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the State/respondent No.2. ORDER (21.07.2011) The grievance of the petitioner is that on 28.05.2010, he was demoted from the post of Branch Manager to the post of Supervisor and penalty was atso imposed against him on reduction ofpay. 2. The petitioner has filed the dispute before the respondent No.2 i.e. Dy. Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Raipur and in the said dispute, reply has already been filed bythe respondent No.1 sometimein the month ofJune, 2010. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that ends of justice would be served if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 for deciding the pending case filed by the petitloner. 4. To this proposition, learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. 5. In these facts and circumstances; the respondent No.2 is directed to decide the case of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 5 months from the next " ~";iw:•^. date of hearing. It would be the duty of the petitioner to apprise the respondent No.2 about the passing of the order. 6. With the above observation this petition is disposed of Priya pritinke'' Judge