IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 9444 of 2008. Decided on: 17th December, 2010. Subhash Chander. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate Geneal and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has already made a representation to the Principal Secretary (PW), Government of Himachal Pradesh for the redressal of his grievance, seeking promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer on 19.12.2002. However, the same has not been decided till date. Mr. P.P. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client has also made further representations and the same have also not been decided till date. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Principal Secretary(PW), Government of Himachal Pradesh to decide the representation dated 19.12.2002 (Annexure A-4) and the subsequent representations made by the petitioner by passing speaking order(s), within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. The petitioner shall be 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. - 2 - heard in person and for that purpose, the date shall be notified to him separately. In case the grievance of the petitioner is redressed, he shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge November 17, 2010. (bhupender) - 3 -