IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2469 of 2010. Decided on: May 31, 2010. Noulu Ram . ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. ….. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Respondents Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Addl. AG, for respondents No.1 to 3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The Writ Petition is filed with the following prayers: “i) That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to give work charged status to the petitioner as Mate as per ratio laid down in Mool Raj Upadhaya Vs. State of H.P., as and when he completed 10 years of service since he was engaged in January 1982 and till 2007 he has served the respondent department as daily wager for 25 years as daily waged Mate with all consequential benefits such as; seniority, arrears of pay, promotion etc. ii) That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to give work charged status to the petitioner from the year 1996 when Respondent No. 4 and 5 who were juniors to the petitioner was given work charged status. iii) That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to give pensionary benefit and give the retirement to the petitioner on attaining the age of 60 years in view of the fact that the 2 petitioner was engaged in the year 1982 and as per the policies framed in the year 2001 and 2003 in respect of retirement and retrial benefit will not be applicable to the petitioner.” 2. It is for the petitioner to file appropriate representation before the second respondent. In the event of the petitioner filing such representation within a period of one month from today, the matter will be duly considered by the second respondent in the light of the submissions made in the representation and a speaking order thereon will be passed within another three months. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition before the second respondent, immediately. 3. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. May 31, 2010. ( Justice Rajiv Sharma), (karan/vs) Judge.