IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16737 of 2011 BANARAS RAI son of Sukdeo Rai resident of village-Bangra Nazamat, P.S.-Sahebganj, Dist.- Muzaffarpur Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.6.2011. Heard Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No.148 of 2008 for the offences under sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner along with other two accused persons, namely Rajesh Sahani and Parshuram Singh had approached this court for grant of anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. No.23716 of 2010 and this court by order dated 6.9.2010 while granting anticipatory bail to the co- accused named above rejected the anticipatory bail of the petitioner granting liberty for making prayer for grant of regular bail. Thereafter, the petitioner surrendered and he is in custody. It was further submitted that in this case compromise in between the parties has already been arrived at and from the injury itself it is evident that section 307 of the Indian Penal Code is not applicable. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case particularly the fact that some of the accused persons have been extended privilege of anticipatory bail and the petitioner has already remained in custody for some time, let the petitioner, above named, 2 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub.Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur (West) in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No.148 of 2008. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)