____ HIGH CQURT QF CHHATTISGARH, BI1A8PUR W.P.(Ci No-4336/2007 PETITIONER n NON-APPUCANT 1. Dilip Kiiniar, aged about 30 years, s/o Surit Ram Suiyavanshi, Panch, Ward No,4, Graiu Paachayat Muru, Tah.Takfaatpur, Dist Bilaspur (C,G.). Versus State of Chtaattisgarh, through, the Secretary, Ftoichayat aad Rural Development, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur The Collector, Bilaspur (C.G) Tlie Cbief Executive Officer, <Jila Paachayat, Bilaspur (C.G) Siib-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Kota Diatt, Bilaspiu- (C.G) Ttie Chief Executive OfBcer, Janpad Panchayat, Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G) Bhagwat. Pathari, aged about 25 ycars, s/o Antu Pathaii, Sarpaach, Graai Panchayat Muru, Tah. Takhatpur, Distt Bflaspur (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA Appearance: Shri Ravindra Agrawal, counsd for tlie Petitioner. Shri Yashwaat Singh, Govt. Advcx-ate, fer the State on advance copy ORAILQRDER (26.07.2007) SUMLL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard. I-ieamed counsel for the petitioner submits that uispite of a report submitfed by the Chief Executive Officer, ^Ianpad Panchayat (Annexure P-2), no action has beeii taken agauast t1ie Sarpaach -2. 3, 4. 5. 6. ^fUSSut^-- c Rao W,P,NA4336/20Q7 and fhe action has been tateen. only againat tlie Secretary. This is fhe only grievance raised by the petitioner in tiiis petition. In fhe opinion of this" coiirt, no direct action appeeurs to be reasonable. However, in view of the provisions of section 40 of fh.e Paachayat Raj Adhiniyam 1993, tlie petitioner may iraise his grievaiice before ttie coaceraed auf.hority, wtio shall dispose of the application fited by the petitione.r in t.his regari keeping in inind fhe provisions ofSection 40 o-fthe said Act. With fhe aforesaid observationa, fhis petition stands finatly disposed of at the niotion stage itsetf. ^i_ Sdf- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge •»-