IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.709 of 2010 GANESH PRASAD KESARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ---with--- CR. REV. No.710 of 2010 RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 18.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. For pulse, there is control order bringing recovery of pulse under 7 of the Essential Commodities Act is the illegality shown by the learned counsel for the petitioners but order impugned has been passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar admittedly revisable but revision is maintainable to Sessions Judge also. There is no legal Bar to approach this Court first but number of cases pending here that this Court is dealing with admission of 2700 and 2800 cases. Certainly, filing of the cases/revision in the Court of Sessions Judge is justified in comparison to this High Court. Hence, petitioners are advised to withdraw these revision applications for filing before the Sessions Judge. They shall be entitled for limitation for the time for which this case remained pending in this Court. Revision petition is, accordingly decided. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)