WP(Crl.) No. 1419/2010 Page 1 Of 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: 24th November 2010 Date of Order: December 06, 2010 + W.P(Crl.) 1419/2010 % 06.12.2010 Rakesh Saraha ...Petitioner Versus State ...Respondent Counsels: Ms. Neha Jain for petitioner. Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for State/respondent. JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? 3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest? JUDGMENT 1. By way of present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed an order 9th August 2010 whereby the application of petitioner for grant of parole was dismissed. 2. The petitioner is undergoing sentence for ransom kidnapping. His appeal was dismissed by this Court on 14th December 2007. It seems that the petitioner was a hardened criminal as he was involved in another case of ransom kidnapping for which he is facing trial. Looking at the antecedents of the petitioner, I am afraid there is every possibility that the petitioner if released on parole, may indulge into another heinous crime. I find no reason to allow this petition. The petition is hereby dismissed. December 06, 2010 SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA, J rd