HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.C.C.©7of200T APPLICANT NON-APPLICANTS Rajeshwar Prasad s/o Amritlal aged about 42 years R/o viUage-Naroti Kapa, TahsU Takhatpur, District-Bilaspur, VERSUS 1. The IJnion of India thi^ugh fhe Miaistry of Hoine Affairs, New Delhi, 2. The Divisional Secunty Conmiissioner, RaUway Protection Force, Soufh Easteni Railway, Nagpur (MH). 3. The Depuly Chief Security Coniinissioner, Railway Protection Porce, Soutli Easteni Railway, Garden Reach, Calcutta (WB). 4. The Senior Securily Officer, Soufh Eastera Railway, I<har^pur(WB). Appearas&ce: Shri P,R,Pataakar, Counsel for fhc applicant Shri P.S.Koshy, Counsel for re<ipondents No.1 to 4, ORALORDER (16.03.2007) SUNILKUMARSINHA^J, This is an application fi1ed for restoi'atioi^ of W.P.No. 3079/2000, whicb was rii^missed for want of proseciition on 19.1.2007. Ijeanied counsel for the applicaDt submits that a defaiilt was conimitted ou 19.1,2007,'when 1iie coiilril not appear hefone. the Coiirt at the tinie of ca11 of the case. He siibinits that tlTie defaiilt is bonafide anid he has bighest regarA for the Court and sunita ^-- ^ M.aC.67/2007 for siich a default, an apology has also heen tendered in the applicatioD, This application is siipported with an afRdavit. It appears that due to bonafide misteke, the coiinsel could not appear in the. csse; therefore, the defaiilt is condoued , The application for restoi^tion ofthe writ petition is allowed, The writ petitioii No. 3079/2000 is restored to its original niimber at the cost of Rs.300/- payable by the pefitioner to the High Court Bar Associatiou, The M.C,C. stamls finalty disposed o€ Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge