WPMS 2434/2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, the learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. H.M. Raturi, the learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondent no. 1. Mr. A.D. Tripathi, the learned counsel for the respondent no. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, the learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Vipul Sharma, the learned counsel for the respondent no. 3. By an order dated 18.11.2011, the Court had dismissed the writ petition insofar as relief no. 1 was concerned and, had directed Sri A.D. Tripathi, the learned counsel for respondent no. 2 to seek instructions with regard to other reliefs, namely, that the Zila Panchayat, Udham Singh Nagar, had no authority in law to charge the licence fee from the petitioners. The contention of the petitioners is, that the matter to this extent was squarely covered by a decision of this Court dated 16th December, 2010, passed in Writ Petition No. 801 of 2009 (M/S), Kumaon Garhwal Chamber of Commerce and Industry Chamber House Industrial Estate vs. State of Uttarakhand and others, which judgment was affirmed in Special Appeal No. 15 of 2011 by an order dated 11.10.2011. This aspect is fairly conceded by the learned counsel for the respondents. In the light of the aforesaid, the writ petition is partly allowed in terms of the directions issued in the judgment dated 16th December, 2010 passed in Writ Petition No. 801 of 2009 (M/S). (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 24-11-2011 SP