IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3570 of 2008 PRAMOD KUMAR s/o late Ganpat singh, Resident of Mohalla Gardanibagh, Dumahala, Durga Asthan, Quarter no. 2, P.S Gardanibagh, Dist-Patna. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Secretary, Animal Husbandry Department Bihar Patna. 3. The Director, Department of Animal Husbandry Bihar Patna. ----------- 2 11.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner was appointed as casual worker in the P.W.D Department on 27.4.1988 and he was retrenched in the year 1990 vide Annexure-3 along with several other persons. The petitioner moved this Court by filing C.W.J.C No. 13069 of 1993 which was disposed of on 25.01.1995 with a direction that if the advertisement is published in the newspaper for filling of the posts, petitioner would be entitled to apply for the post, the age of the petitioner should not be a factor, which would debar the petitioner from being appointed. However, no positive action was taken by the said authority, inasmuch as advertisement was not issued for filling of the vacancies. On 16.3.2006 State has issued a notification fixing the cut of date, for those, persons who have worked 240 days prior to 11.12.1990. Obviously, this notification has not been issued in compliance of the order of this Court but is nevertheless a decision of the State Government. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance of the notification issued vide Annexure-6 the State 2 Government has regularized the services of 13 persons by letter No. 12016(S) dated 20.10.2006. The immediate reason for moving this Court is Annexure-8 by which one Sunil Kumar Sharma working in the Animal Husbandry Department has been regularized by the Director, Animal husbandry by Memo No. 13 (5) 3007/94 dated 15.05.1994. The said Sunil Kumar Sharma was terminated along with the petitioner vide Annexure-3. The petitioner’s name is at serial no. 7 whereas the name of Sunil Kumar Sharma was placed at Serial No. 1 by Memo No. 13(2)-506/93 dated 27.07.1993(the letter of termination). Both are employees of the Animal Husbandry Department. I accordingly, direct the respondent Nos. 2 to 3 to take into account the aforesaid fact and pass appropriate order in accordance with law. If the petitioner files a representation before the respondent no. 2 within a period of 4 weeks on receipt of a copy of this order, respondent No. 2 should pass an appropriate order within a period of 6 months. This writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Prakash ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)