IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14340 of 2005 MONA DEVI @ MUNNI DEVI, W/O Hardish Rai, Resident of Village Mahima Gopinathpur, P.S. Motipur, District Muzaffarpur. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR though the District Collector, Muzaffarpur. 2.District Welfare Officer, Muzaffarpur. 3.Child Development Project Officer, Motipur,Distric t Muzaffarpur. 4.Ranju Devi, W/O Rajnandan Rai, village Mahima P.S. Motipur, District Muzaffarpur. ----------- 3 13/11/2009 No one appears for the petitioner. Prayer in this writ application of the petitioner reads as follows:- “This is an application for issuance of a writ in the nature of writ of “Mandamus” or any other appropriate writ/order or direction commanding the respondents to cancelled the appointment of Ranju Devi as Angan Bari Sevika/Sahayika and appoint the petitioner as Angan Bari Sevika/Sahaika.” With reference to the aforementioned relief this Court would find that not only counsel for the petitioner is absent but even otherwise the petitioner does not seems to be aware as to on which post respondent no.4, Ranju Devi, was appointed whether Angan Bari Sevika or Sahayika. That being so, when the grievance of the petitioner can definitely be ventilated by the concerned district Collector in accordance with the circular of the State Government, who would make enquiry and decide the question of fact relating to anomalies/infirmities in the process of selection of Angan Bari Sevika/Sahayika, this Court would only give liberty to the petitioner 2 to file such representation before the District Collector of the district. In case such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same will be disposed of by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. With the aforementioned observation this application is disposed of. Abhay Kumar (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)