^i:j,p@ l^tNbi 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. N0. S^y/2005 PETITIONER ^, ^•-:^ ^^^.x' ^' .-^v<^<^ ^ ^/>}.-^v G?]..^:; ^y^y ^:"y ^A.-^' y RESPONDENTS Krishna Kumar Chandrakar Aged about 40 years S/o. R.K. Chandrakar R/o. Village Boriyakhurd, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS /- ^' f^ ••<.f ^^ o ^:^ c^ ;1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Collector Raipur (C.G.) /I. Krishi Upaj Mandi Raipur (C.G.) z3. Managing Director Agricultural Marketing Board (Krishi Upaj Mandi) Raipur (C.G.) ^' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -^\.o Sa&^sy XI-HC-22 ^^ T^NI<n4, ^Tll^Ko, I^TRTy STT^T^T fe^icb s^\ $^*lich <^[^a HTW'TS ^NIch 3TI^T 'q=r^ ^^ f ••^-P-N0.^^1^(&Q'S ••^< 200 3^ ^<st" ^TT^T'^TT^R'H^T '^prf^Fft^r ^TTH^f'^^S <Fsi^l< ^'<3rf^R-^3T[^^ 24.11.2005 Shri R. Pradhan , learnecl coun Shri Sandeep Dubey, fi'ovt Ad Ku. SamtQ Jain for respondenf No. 2. The petitioner Js resident ^©1for the petitioner< ^ocatefor the State. of village Boriyakhurd, Raipur folljn9 in the constituency" of Sej|bdiar for Kr-jshi Upcy Mandi elections. It ispointed out that 14 the year 1999, Sejbahar seat was declared GS unreserved seat. ^hile considering constituencies for ailotment of seots by rotattonjunder Sectiori 3 of Krishi Upqj Mandi (Mandi Samiati Ke Nirv<jichan) Rules, 1997, Sejbahar constituency has been shown os re^ in the year 1999. It seems that ^ which has found place inadvertent] exceptthis. LeQrned counsel for the pe^ lerved for other bQckward cciste^ |here Ss a typographicd mistoke y. There is no other challenge itioner further submsts thof in delimitation of the constituenci^s, the Collector who is the competent ctuthority under the rul^s has taken away three villagers from this constituency and added t< heard submission made by the petj 3 other constituency. Having gone through the p^iper produced here and having itioner, I found that there is no snfringement of any le9al or s|atutory rights which calIs for tu -^ [Tft^ ^fe^ XI-HC-22 37T^['^T f^fw 5^44[^^IT^[ ^pfft/a E^ ,/^y '^v '^^'^TPTT^R, ^nl^4i<o, fa<ni<H^< 3TT^T ^^ tj- p -M O • A^0 ^l ^P ^ .^^^.......;..........................^..^^ ^^ ^SNCT ^W^r •^ ^ l^^s.r' ^n^r'^rratR'Hfi'pr indulgence of this Court under Arfi India. If there was a mistake as po same may be referred to the approp In view of the fore9oin9/the No order as to cbsts. lle 226 of the Constitution ot ibted out by the petitioner. the t ., [•iate authority. Aetition isdismissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge chi^f<n4l'i 'WT^ff'? f^^t <P»i^i< i73ri^FT3?I^T -z-- [Tit^'^ft'o^r