.. 1 .. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TEST. PETITION NO. 895 OF 2000 ALONG WITH TEST PETITION NO. 403 OF 2000 ALONG WITH TEST. SUIT. NO. 1662 OF 1994 Mr. Kishor Vishnu Chitnis .. Deceased Dr. Ramesh Dattatraya Potdar .. Petitioner Vs. Smt. Sushma N. Chitnis .. Defendant Mr. Ruchir Tolat for the Plaintiff [in 1662/1994]. None for the Defendants. CORAM : S.K. SHAH, J. DATED : 30.9.2004. P.C.- 1. None for the defendants even though duly served. The precipe is taken out for fixing the time limit for completing the recording of evidence. 2. The learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that in Suit No.101 of 2000 the recording of evidence has commenced and only one witness has been examined. The examination of that witness was completed on 30th .. 2 .. June, 2000. Thereafter no witness has been produced. 3. The Plaintiffs in suit No. 101 of 2000 are directed to produce the witness before the Commissioner at the Commissioners convenience within 15 days from today. [S.K. SHAH, J.]