\ f ( IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c.G.) W.P. (C) No. Hlgg of 2011 I PETITIONER Sitaram Banjare, aged about 45 .years, S/o Mahetar Banjare, Bus operator, R/o Takhatpur, District BHaspur (C.G.)‘ ' VERSUS Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) ,,,,, i’f/igx:gi% WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE f;éi$_’na&_x u , CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 4295 OF 2011 t r l (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) 'Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Santosh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. PETITIONER Sitaram Banjare Versus RESPONDENT Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur. ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 04‘ day of August, 201 1) 1. Shri Gupta, Iearned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made an a’pplication on 27.04.2011 seeking temporary permit for the period from 01 05.2011 to 31 .08.201 1. 2. In case of temporary permit under Section 87 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the application has to be decided expeditiously. In this case, at this stage, when three months have already been passed and one month is left, no useful purpose would be served, if a direction is made to the RTO to consider the application of the petitioner and pass the order. Shri Gupta, submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a fresh application with a direction to the authorities to r’ consider his application expeditiously, to which Shri Thakur, Iearned State counsel submits that if a fresh application is made, the same shall be considered, as expeditiously as possible, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the application. 4. In view of foregoing, Shri Gupta submits that nothing remains for adjudication in this matter. , ' 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri I Judge observation and direction. tr: !