IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 17039 of 2008 Between: Muthavarapu Purnender Rao S/o.Satyanarayana Kapugallu(V) Kodad(M) Nalgonda District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Dist Collector Nalgonda District 2 The Dy.Director of Fisheries Nalgonda Nalgonda District 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer Suryapet Suryapet Nalgonda District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ,order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the action of the 3rd respondent in insisting for the removal of ﬁsh tank situated in Sy.No.716/A,716/AA 716/E 716/EE 716/U at Kapugallu(V) Kodad(M) Nalgonda District as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere with ﬁsh tank situated in Sy.No.716/A,716/AA 716/E 716/EE 716/U at Kapugallu(V) Kodad(M) Nalgonda District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.17039 OF 2008 ORAL ORDER: The petitioner states that he is the owner and possessor of the agricultural lands admeasuring Ac.4.36 guntas in Survey Nos.716/A, 716/AA, 716/E, 716/EE and 716/U of Kapugallu Village, Kodad Mandal, Nalgonda District and that after obtaining the necessary permission from the ﬁrst and second respondents herein, he constructed ﬁsh tanks in the said lands. While so, it is the grievance of the petitioner that the third respondent-Revenue Divisional Oﬃcer, Suryapet, Nalgonda District, without following the due process of law, is threatening to remove the ﬁsh tanks from the lands in question which is illegal and arbitrary. When the matter is taken up for admission today, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, submitted that the third respondent-Revenue Divisional Oﬃcer is not interfering with ﬁshing operations being conducted by the petitioner in the lands in question and is not going to remove the same. Recording the said submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, the writ petition is closed. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J. Date: 06.08.2008. VGSR