11.11 HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARH:BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'bleShri DJIjpRaosahebiDeshmukh,J. CJvilRevisionNo. 198 of 2008 Petitioner Non-applicant ResDondents Applicant TheEmpioyer, Mahaveer Industrjal Corporation, Section No.5-B, j9 Block tndustriaf At^a,Bhanpuri,Raipur(CG) Through: its Rroprietor Harenctra Prasad Sharma, S/o Bitori Sharma, aged about 50 yepirs, R/o Qr. No. B- 19, Housing Board Colohy, Bjrgaon, Tahsil and DJstrict|Raipur (CG) Versus $heshnarayan Sahu @ Narayan, S/o Lalaram Sahju, thro^ Shramik Sangh, i Shahid Nagar, Birgaon; Raipur(CG) Priya Civil revision under Section 11 5 6f the CPC Present Shri M.K. Bhadun, counselforthe petitiioner. ORALORDER (Passed on 21.01.2009) I Heard on admissibn. ^ ; (2) Thepetitioneris aggrievedbybrderdated 27.11.2008 passed by the CommissiQner for Workmen's Compensation, Labour Court, Raipur (CG) in case No.l/96/2008/W.C. Act/Non Fata!, whereby an appiication under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPCfiled bythe petitioner yvas dismissed. (3) In view of Rule 41 of the Workmen's Compensation Ruies, 1924, provisions of Order 7 Rule 11 of CPCare not appiicable "fc/" proceeding before the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation. (4) There is no merit in this revision, which is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge Bi•K111 I^^SBr• ll^ g Bl liit EISt B n 1