1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.09.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P(MD)No.11185 of 2011 M.V.Pandiyen .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Aringar Anna Maligai, Madurai. 3.The District Surveyor, Madurai District, Madurai. 4.The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 25.08.2010 and to measure the property in T.S.No.31, 33 and 96 an extent of 1 acre and 26- 1/2 cents in Bibikulam, Tallakulam, Madurai with the help of the third respondent and also to issue the notice of decision taken by him to the petitioner in the prescribed manner in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.Babu Rajendran For R-1, R-3 and R-4 : Mr.M.Govindan, Special Govt. Pleader For R-2 : Mr.M.Jothi Basu ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 25.08.2010 and to measure the property in T.S.No.31, 33 and 96 to an extent of 1 acre and 26-1/2 cents in Bibikulam, Tallakulam, Madurai with the help of the third respondent and to issue notice regarding the decision taken by him to the petitioner, in accordance with law. 2. Heard Mr.Babu Rajendran, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for R-1, R-3 and R-4 and Mr.M.Jothi Basu, learned counsel, who takes notice for R-2. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final hearing. 4. In respect of the above stated relief, the petitioner has made a representation to the second respondent on 25.08.2010. Since the same has not been considered so far, the petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition. 5. Without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the appropriate authority is directed to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 25.08.2010 and do the needful in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after considering the claim of objection of any third party if any. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's claim. 6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No Costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AE) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Madurai District,Madurai. 2.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Aringar Anna Maligai, Madurai. 3.The District Surveyor, Madurai District,Madurai. 4.The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District. +1cc to Special Govt.Pleader SR.No.33978 +1cc to Mr.Babu Rajendran, Advocate SR.No.34205 +1cc to Mr.M.Jothibasu, Advocate SR.No.33658 W.P.(MD)No.11185 of 2011 28.09.2011 pm PA/19.10.2011/2P/8C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/