IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 29TH MARCH 2010 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 10622 of 2010(C) --------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. ANSHID K.A., 'ASNAZ', KOLOLAMBA P.O., EDAPPAL, MALAPPURAM. 2. ANEESH M.E., MADATHILNJALIL HOUSE, CHIRAMANANGAD P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. MR.T.MADHU, SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY MR. P.C. SASIDHARAN, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/03/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 10622 of 2010-C - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 29th day of March, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioners herein were the students of MES College of Engineering, Kuttippuram for B.Tech Electrical and Electronics Engineering Degree course for the year 2005-2009. The said college is affiliated to the first respondent University. 2. It is submitted that the petitioners herein have appeared for the third semester supplementary examination conducted by the respondents during June 2009. The results of the same were published in the 2nd week of February, 2010. The first petitioner has failed for two papers, viz. EE 04 304 (Mechanical Engineering II) and EE 04 305 (Electronics I). The second petitioner has failed for 3 papers, viz. EE 04 301 (Engineering Mathematics III), EE 04 304 (Mechanical Engineering) and EE 04 305 (Electronics I). The petitioners applied for revaluation of the above papers on 19.2.2010 and 23.2.2010 respectively. Exts.P1 and P2 are the copies of applications submitted by the petitioner. Alleging delay on the part of the University in publishing the results of the revaluation, this writ petition has been filed. wpc 10622/2010 2 2. Heard learned Standing Counsel for the University. 3. There will be a direction to the respondents to publish the results of the revaluation applied for by the petitioners, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, if the applications and the fee remitted are otherwise in order. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/