IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 10990 of 2008. Decided on 21 st December, 2010. Manoj Kumar Gupta. …Petitioner. -Versus- H.P. State Electricity Board and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No ________________________________________________________ __ For the petitioner. : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents. : Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner restricts his claim only to the release of salary of the vacation period. This issue is no more res integra in view of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in Baldev Singh and others versus State of H.P. and others, CWP No. 415 of 2000, decided on 1st September, 2008. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release and pay the salary of the vacation period to the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 21, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.