IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28481 of 2009 RAJENDRA YADAV, son of Nathuni Prasad Yadav, resident of village Samda Kamat, P.S. Ratanpura, District Supaul Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 2.4.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by an order dated 27.3.2009 in Cr.Misc.No. 51677/2008 considering merits of the case. There was no observation for the petitioner to renew his prayer but then he would rely on the part of the aforesaid order wherein it was mentioned that his prayer for bail was rejected only at that stage. This Court has before it the report of the trial court dated 15th October, 2009 which shows that the charges have been framed and the summons have been issued to the witnesses and the trial court expects the trial to conclude within a period of nine months. Considering the fact that a period of more than five months out of the aforementioned nine months have already been completed, while this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner but then it 2 is observed that if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within a period of six months from today, he would renew his prayer for bail initially before the trial court which then would record the reasons for not concluding the trial, only whereafter the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before this Court. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/