IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5267 of 2008 MALATI DEVI, WIFE OF RAMESHWAR RAJAK, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KURASAN, P.S. BHABUA, DISTRICT KAIMUR AT BHABUA. ------ PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE DISTRICT OFFICER, KAIMUR AT BHABUA. 2. DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, KAIMUR AT BHABUA. 3. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, KAIMUR AT BHABUA. 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BLOCK CHAINPUR, KAIMUR AT BHABUA. 5. THE BLOCK WELFARE OFFICER, BLOCK CHAINPUR, KAIMUR AT BHABUA. 6. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BLOCK CHAINPUR, KAIMUR AT BHABUA. 7. PANCHAYAT MUKHIYA OF VILLAGE PANCHAYAT KURASAN, KAIMUR AT BHABUA. ---- RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 29.4.2011 The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that she was not selected for the post of an Anganwari Sahayika for the Centre No. III in village Panchayat Kurasan within the district Kaimur at Bhabua. The claim of the petitioner that she was chosen in the ‘Aam Sabha’ but the Mukhiya surreptitiously issued a letter of selection in favour of one Sukha Devi. An enquiry was held which is annexed as Annexure-4. In the said enquiry it was found that the procedure had not been followed and there was a dispute with respect to signature of certain members who were supposed to be present in the meeting. The District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua by order dated 25.9.2007 has ordered for fresh selection. The petitioner ought to have filed an appeal against the order of the Collector if she was so aggrieved but instead of doing that, she has come to this Court by filing a writ application. Since there is a dispute in the manner in which the selection was made, I do not 2 actually find any illegality in the order of the District Magistrate when he states that the selection should be cancelled and a fresh selection process should be started. This writ application is thus, dismissed. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)