Civil Revision No.496 of 2011(O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Civil Revision No.496 of 2011(O&M) Decided on : January 27, 2011 S.K.Mehta ... Petitioner VERSUS M/s IPCA Laboratories Ltd. and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Satish Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N.JINDAL, J.- This revision petition has arisen out of the order dated 17.12.2010 refusing the plaintiff - petitioner to amend the plaint, whereby, he wanted to take the plea that if he is not reinstated, then he may be awarded damages. Having gone through the plaint, it reveals that the plaintiff has sought the declaration that the order dated 4.12.1998 passed by defendants – respondents for termination of his services be declared as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, ultra-vires, against the principles of natural justice and null and void, and that he is entitled to reinstatement with all other consequential benefits of salary and allowances. In the alternative, he has prayed that he could be awarded any relief which the Court deems Civil Revision No.496 of 2011(O&M) [ 2 ] appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the case. In view of the plea as set up in the alternative, the amendment as sought for is not required. If the Court reaches the conclusion that the petitioner could not be reinstated and is entitled to damages, then it could award the same and in that case, the petitioner could be asked to pay the court fee accordingly. With the above observations, the petition is dismissed. January 27, 2011 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE