IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 4302— OF 2004 PETITIONER ~1. DR. SHAKRAJIT NAYAK S/O LATE SHRI LALMAN NAYAK, MEMBER OF ‘m LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, SARIYA, 19, GRAM AVAPALI, POST BARAMKELA, DISTT. RAIGARH C.G. // 2. SHRI SIYARTAM NAYAK S/O SHRI DURYODAN NAYAK AGED 58 YEARS, VILLAGE AND POST BAR DISTT. RAIGARH CG PRESIDENT, BLOCK CONTRESS COMMITTEE BARAMKELA. “3.8HR1 DEVENDRA KUMAR "’ NAYAK s / o sHRI HRIDAYARAM’A’GED 35 YEARS VILLAGE AND POST DEVGAON BLOCK BARAMKELA DISTT. RAIGARH C.G. ® 4. SHRI NANHUBABU SAHU S/O SHRI CHHOTELAL AGED 45 YEARS, VILLAGE BOIRDIH POST BARAMKELA DISTT. RAIGARH C.G. .52SHRI RIPURAJ PATEL S/O SHRI BRIJRAJ AGED 50 YEARS, VILLAGE KOTRA POST BADENAWAPARA BLOCK BARAMKELA, DISTT. RAIGARH C.G. /6.3HRI VIVACHH KUMAR PAW S/O SHRI KARIYAMANI AGED 35 YEARS, VILLAGED AND POST BONDA BLOCK BARAMKELA DISTT. RAI GARH C.G. ,7. SHRI PREMSINGH SAHIS S/O SHRI BAIJU AGED 35 YEARS, VILLAGE AND POST BONDA c514135203 BLOCK BARAMKELA DISTT. $0TARY V BxiaspuHC G) RAIGARH C.G. 8. SHRI ARUN NISHAD S/O SHRI NARSING‘H AGED 35 YEARS € ® RESPONDENTS //1’L STATION HOUSE OFFICER BARAMKELA,DI STT.RAIGARH POST BARAMKELA DISTT. RAIGARH C.G. VILLAGE BUDELI VERSUS C.G. . SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAIGARH C.G. STATE OF C.G THROUGH OJ ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVT. OF CHHATTISGARH, D.K.S.BHAWAN, RAIPUR C.G. 3. SHRI JAGGANATH PANIGRAHI DISTRI CT PRESIDENT BHARTI JANTA PARTY RAIGARH. ., WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE NDIA. FOR ISSURANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE , RIT IN THE NATURE 'OF MANDAMUS l CERTIORARK 3 - ‘ ETC. OR DIRECTIONS}!ORDERllf‘EEIN THE LIKE NATURE ETC CONSTITUTION OF I ”J9 a\@ $9 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 4902 0f2004 : Dr. Shakrajit Nayak & Others. VERSUS PETITIONER RESPONDENTS : Station House OEicer, Baramkela & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Honvhie Shri Satish K. Agnihoti‘i. J. Present: None for the petitionEr. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. GA for the State. @RMR (01mm (Passed on 25m day 0f Octcber, 2610) The matter is calimi for hearing. None appears nor is any i‘em‘eseniatioa made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In View ofthe above, the matter is Liigmissed for want of prosecution. Sdl— Sau'sh K. Agnihou-i Judge )h £31 (3»