C^^-^L^ Sjrsgg®g@gtth IN THE HJGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fC.G.) W.P. (81 No. S^^J?> /2011 1 PETITIONER Shambu Kumar, S/o. Late Ram Swarath Singh, aged about 47 years, Ex. Constable No. 852310674, CISF, R/o. Qrt. No. B-228, Pragati Nagar, Darri, Korba (C.G.) RESPONDENTS \..^^ ..^> <\..-w^"" ^\ \^t^A l^ \v-'' >'^<,.fc":" ..-^t>v" ^^/ 'y VERSUS (1) l Union of India, through Secretary Miriistry of Home Affairs, New Delhi (2) Inspector General, CISF, Home Mmistiy, East Zone Headquarter, Boring Road, PATNA. ^'" (3) Deputy Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force, Eastern Zone Headquarters, CISF Office Complex, Bormg Road Patliputra, PATNA800013 (4) The Group Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, Eastern Zone Headquarters, CISF Office Complex, Boring Road Patliputra, PATNA 800 013 (5) The Deputy Commandant CISF, Airport Security Unit, PATNA * (6) The Assistant Commandant CISF, Airport Security Unit, PATNA (7) Commandant, CISF Korba Super Thermal Power Plant, Korba, Chhattisgarh =? WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH AT BILASPUE (Hon. Mr Justice Pritinker Diwaker) W.P.(S)No. 3453 of 2011 Petitioner Shambu Kumar VERSUS Respondent Union of India and Others Priya Present: Shri P.S. Koshy, counsel for the petitioner. Shri K. Shakeel for the respondents. QJRDJER (13.07.2011) Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 24/25.05.2011 by which while dismissing the appeal of the petitjoner, the order of compulsory retirement dated 07.01.2002 has been upheld. 2. Shri Koshy fairly submits that the petitioner has an aiternate remedy of filing the revision under Section 9 (2A) of the Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968 and therefore, he may be permitted to avail the same. He further submits that in the event of filing of any such revision, thecompetent authority may be directed to decide the same expeditiously. 3. Shri Shakeel submits that he has no objection if the petitioner files any such revision and the same is decided expeditiously. 4. In these facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this revision with liberty to file revision before the competent authority. 5. In the event of filing of any such revision, it is expected from the competent authority to decide the same as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the same. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge