1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Third Bail Application No.8279/2010 Kali Bai @ Rukhsana Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 26.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Abdul Rahim Khan - for the petitioner Mr GS Fauzdar, Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a case has been registered for offence under sections 498A and 406 IPC. Husband of complainant has already surrendered and bail has been granted on returning articles forming 'stridhan'. Petitioner is sister- in-law of complainant and has no connection with the offence. Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner may be granted anticipatory bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 2 After taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, I allow bail application of petitioner under section 438 CrPC. Therefore, the SHO/IO of the Police Station – Mahila Thana, Kota is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Kali Bai @ Rukhsana in FIR No. 153/2010 registered for offence under Section/s 498-A and 406 IPC he shall enlarge her on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- with one surety in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i)She shall make herself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii)She shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)She shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (iv)She shall not commit same and similar offence during the period of bail. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma