1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R 1. D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.10473 of 2009. Suresh Kumar Sharma son of late Shri Sadhu Ram Sharma VERSUS State of Rajasthan 2. D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.11915 of 2009. Suresh Kumar son of Shri Sadhu Ram VERSUS State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order :::: 05/11/2009 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.S. Chaudhari Mr. Rajendra Singh Rathore, Counsel for the Petitioner Mrs. Rekha Madnani, Dy. Govt. Counsel for the State *** BY THE COURT : D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.10473 of 2009 . Instant petition has been received by post from the prisoner-petitioner - Suresh Kumar Sharma son of late Shri Sadhu Ram Sharma, who is serving the sentence having been convicted for commission of the offence under Section 302 of the I.P.C. and is at present lodged at Central Jail, Jaipur. 2 The prisoner-petitioner also thereafter submitted a regular writ petition bearing No.11915/2009 through his counsel Shri R.S. Rathore, with the similar prayer. The grievance of the petitioner in both these writ petitions is that the petitioner had been granted the relief for being released on parole by the Advisory Committee in its meeting held on 25.06.2009 vide Annexure-2 (second regular parole for 30-days), but it appears that the petitioner could not submit the requisite personal and surety bonds within time, as directed in the order and, therefore, in both these petitions it was prayed that the time for submitting the same may be extended. Since, both these petitions were filed by the same petitioner seeking identical relief, therefore, we have heard both the petitions together and decided by this common order. During the course of hearing, the learned counsel for the respondents brought to our notice that the relief, which the petitioner was seeking has been granted by the respondents in its meeting held on 27.10.2009 and have placed the order dated 30.10.2009 before this Court. The respondents have themselves granted second regular parole to the petitioner afresh without any conditions vide order dated 30.10.2009, in pursuance of the 3 decision taken in the meeting held on 27.10.2009, in view of the fact that the relief, which was sought has been granted to the petitioner by the respondents, both these petitions have become infructuous and are dismissed as such. Consequently, both these petitions stand disposed of as having become infructuous. (K.S. Chaudhari), J. (Dalip Singh), J. ashok/