1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 6935 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 6935 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 6935 OF 2004 Shri. Bhagwan Ramdas Patil ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.N.V. Bandiwadekar for Petitioner. Mrs. S.S. Bhende, A.G.P. for Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & S.P. S.P. S.P. KUKDAY,JJ. KUKDAY,JJ. KUKDAY,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : MARCH 09, 2005 : MARCH 09, 2005 : MARCH 09, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The only grievance of the Petitioner is that the another officer also charged similarly, the punishment imposed is lesser than that of the petitioner. From the records, it is clear that the number of offences for which the petitioner was charged were more in number than the other officer agaisnt whom it is contended lesser punishment was imposed. . It is for the disciplinary authority considering the charges and gravity of the misconduct to impose punishment. In the instant case, we find no case for interference nor does the order suffers from any error apparent on the face 2 of record. Hence, no interference is called for. Petition rejected. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) REBELLO,J.) REBELLO,J.) (S.P. (S.P. (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) KUKDAY,J.) KUKDAY,J.)