1 wp1550.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Writ Petition No. 1550 of 2010 Noor Khan ....Petitioner v/s. C.B.I., A.C.B. Mumbai ....Respondents WITH Writ Petition No. 1551 of 2010 Mr. Godfrey Alex Lobo ....Petitioner v/s. C.B.I., A.C.B. Mumbai ....Respondents Mr. U.N. Shingnapurkar for the petitioner. Mandar Goswami for respondent no.1. Mrs. M.R. Tidke-APP for the State. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 7th June, 2011 P.C. The petitioner challenges the order dated 23rd March, 2009 thereby rejecting the application filed by the present petitioners for discharge. Shri Shingnapurkar the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that since the acts alleged are offences under Emmigration Act, 1983, in view of provisions of Section 27, the prosecution itself is not tenable unless the previous sanction of the Central Government is obtained. 2. From the perusal of the charge sheet it would reveal that it is the specific 2 wp1550.10.sxw allegation of the prosecution that the offences alleged are under Section 120(b), 420, 465 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. The perusal of the charge sheet would further reveal that ingredients to constitute an offence under the aforesaid provisions of IPC are made out. 3. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference. Rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J)