1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED 16.12.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P(MD)No.13989 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 P.Subramani .. Petitioner Vs 1. The Regional Transport Authority, Trichy-9. 2. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Trichy. .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent herein to implement the order of the first respondent made in R.No.41468/A2/2011, dated 31.05.2011 by making endorsement of transfer in the Stage Carriage Permit in respect of vehicle No.TN-45/R 1244 plying on the route"MAIN GUARD GATE" to "KAVALKARANPATTI" forthwith. For Petitioner : M/s.K.Hariharan For Respondents : Mr.T.Janarthanam, Addl.Govt.Pleader ORDER The Petitioner/P.Subramani and one Mr.Kaliappan jointly applied for transfer of permit in his name before the first respondent on 9.5.2011 to the first respondent/The Regional Transport Authority, Trichy, since Mr.Kaliappan of Trichy had a stage carriage permit with a validity up to 1.7.2016. The first respondent has also granted permission to transfer the permit in his name by passing the order, dated 31.05.2011, with further direction to transfer the R.C.book in his name and to produce the valid records of the said bus bearing Registration No. TN-45/R-1244 within four months from the date of receipt of transfer of permit proceedings order. 2. Though the second respondent on 17.06.2011 transferred the ownership in the petitioner's name and thereafter when the petitioner by producing the valid records of the bus before the second respondent, the second respondent has not made any endorsement in the permit. The second respondent till date has not https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 made any endorsement of transfer in the permit. Therefore, the petitioner has come to this Court with the above said prayer. 3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that there has been some dispute pending in this connection and the relevant files have been sent to Chennai. However, as the petitioner has now sought for limited relief to dispose of the petitioner's representation, dated 2.9.2011, this Court has no impediment to issued a direction as sought for and accordingly direction is issued to the second respondent/The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Trichy to consider and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation, dated 2.9.2011 on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Writs) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1. The Regional Transport Authority, Trichy-9. 2. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Trichy. +1 CC to Mr.A.C.Asaithambi, Advocate (SR.No.44088) +1 CC to Special Government Pleader (SR.No.44330) W.P(MD)No.13989 OF 2011 16.12.2011 vsn NSV/29.12.11/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/