IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5176 OF 2004 Shri Dinesh @ Dinkar Shamrao Patil ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.Ujwal R.Agandsurve for Applicant. Mr.D.R.More, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. NOVEMBER 29, 2004. NOVEMBER 29, 2004. NOVEMBER 29, 2004. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. 2. Learned A.P.P. fairly accepts that the prosecution case against the present Applicant is similar to that of co-accused Ashok Nadkar. Besides, learned A.P.P. points out that the prime accused has been granted anticipatory bail by this : 2 : Court. In the circumstances, the Applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail on the following conditions : (a) The Applicant is granted bail in connection with C.R.No.I-151/04 registered with Sarkarwada Police Station, Nasik, on executing personal bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two local sureties in the like amount. (b) The Applicant shall report to the concerned Police Station once in fortnight on Saturday between 10.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. during the trial. (c) The Applicant shall not influence the prosecution witnesses or tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner whatsoever. (d) The Applicant shall extend full co-operation to the Trial Court for early disposal of the trial and if the Trial Court is of the opinion that the Applicant is responsible for the : 3 : delay of the trial, that fact be recorded in the Roznama, which can be a ground for cancellation of bail. . Application allowed on the above terms. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.