1 Review Petition No.95 of 2008 in Writ Petition No.267 of 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW PETITION NO.95 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.267 OF 2004 Balaji S/o.Dnyanoba Dappadwad PETITIONER VERSUS State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS Mr.S.K.Tambe, learned A.G.P. for respondents. (CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.) DATE : 12/07/2011 PER COURT : 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner though this matter is circulated before us, and therefore this application is dismissed for default. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) (P.V.HARDAS, J.) khs/JULY 2011/review petition 95-08 2 Review Petition No.95 of 2008 in Writ Petition No.267 of 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW PETITION NO.95 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.267 OF 2004 Balaji S/o.Dnyanoba Dappadwad PETITIONER VERSUS State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS Mr.A.S.Golegaonkar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr.S.K.Tambe, learned A.G.P. for respondents. (CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.) DATE : 12/07/2011 PER COURT : 1. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner tenders his apology, which is accepted and the matter is restored to file. Learned counsel for the petitioner states on instructions that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this review application. Review application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) (P.V.HARDAS, J.) khs/JULY 2011/review petition 95-08