1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3800 OF 2008 Manoj Bansilal Kori .. Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Ms.Kirti Dabir for the applicant. Mrs.P.P.Shinde A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 14TH NOVEMBER, 2008. DATED : 14TH NOVEMBER, 2008. DATED : 14TH NOVEMBER, 2008. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.22 of 2007 of Borivali police station, Mumbai. The said crime has been registered against the applicant and five others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 450, 452, 395, 392 r/w 34 of the IPC. The applicant and others allegedly committed a dacoity and robbed the complainant’s property worth Rs.5.25 Lacs. While committing the dacoity the applicant and other co-accused allegedly used pistol and chopper. The applicant seems to be habitual offender against whom eight cases, including the instant C.R., are pending trial. The allegations in 2 2 2 all the C.Rs. are similar and the provisions of IPC applied are also similar. All these offences have been committed by the applicant while on bail in the crime registered against him in 2005. Keeping the antecedents of the applicant in view, in my opinion, he does not deserve to be released on bail. Hence the application is rejected. However, looking to the fact that there are eight cases pending against the applicant of similar nature the trial is expedited. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)