IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.253 of 2009 GHANSHYAM AGRAWAL @ GANSHYAM DAS AGRAWAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar. For the respondent Bank : M/S. Mahesh Narayan Parbat & Mrityunjay Kumar. For the respondent State : M/S. B K P Sinha (GP-3) and Suryakant Kumar (AC to GP 3). -------- 03. 07.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent Bank. One of the reasons stated in the writ application for challenging the order before the High Court is that there was no regular Presiding Officer available before the Debts Recovery Tribunal at the relevant time. This grievance of the petitioner now stands redressed because there is a full fledged Presiding Officer. Let the petitioner carry his dispute before that forum. The writ application is dismissed with above liberty. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)