IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH MARCH 2011 / 18TH PHALGUNA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 1611 of 2011() ----------------------- Crime No. 199 of 2005 of Balh Police Station, Mandi District, Himachal Pradesh PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED ---------------------- ISMAIL @ AKRAM BHAI,AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.AHAMMED,CHUVANNA PARAMBIL HOUSE, CHERUPURAM, VELAM,VADAKARA,KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.R.SUDHISH SMT.M.MANJU RESPONDENT(S): STATE -------------------- STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. Public Prosecutor Sri. V. Manu THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No. 1611 of 2011 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 9th March, 2011 ORDER Petitioner who is the 2nd accused in Crime No. 199 of 2005 of Balh Police Station, Mandi District, Himalchal Pradesh for offences punishable under Sections 420, 419 and 406 I.P.C. , seeks his enlargement on bail. 2. The petitioner is also an accused in the following cases:- i) Crime No. 35 of 1994 now pending before the J.F.C.M. II, Perambra (C.C. No. 404/2010 for offences punishable under Sections 457, 380, 416 I.P.C.) ii) Crime No. 306/2006 of Kalpakancherry Police Station under Sections 366 and 376 I.P.C. iii) Crime No. 347 of 2006 of Kalpakancheery Police Station under Sections 120 (b), 447, 307 and 326 read with Section 34 I.P.C. iv) Crime No. 227 of 2010 of Kalpakancheery Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 420, 506 (1) read with Sec. 34 I.P.C. v) Case pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore in Kolkatta for offences punishable under Sections 467, 463, 471, 420 and 120 (B) I.P.C. 2. According to the petitioner, the last mentioned case of B.A. No. 1611 of 2011 -:2:- Kolkatta has been quashed by the Kolkatta High Court for which no orders have been produced before this Court. With regard to C.C. No. 404 of 2010 the petitioner is facing trial before the Perambra Court on remand warrant. With regard to the present case, eventhough a production warrant was issued from the Mandi Court in Himachal Pradesh, it was not complied with due to the non-mentioning of the date for production in the order and the prison authorities have addressed the Mandi Court for fresh production warrant whic is awaited . In the backdrop of these facts, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner who had been absconding in C.C. No. 404 of 2010 for 16 years. This Petition is accordingly, dismissed. Dated this the 9th March, 2011. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani.