IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.10638 of 2011 R.P.Garg ...Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Raman Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has retired. His grievance is that his pension and retiral benefits in complete are not being released. Concededly, there is a charge sheet pending decision against him. However, the counsel claims that the petitioner would be entitled to release of leave encashment and provident fund etc., which cannot be withheld even if the charge sheet is pending. The petitioner has already served a legal notice for the release of the retiral benefits, which is not being decided. Without going into the merits of the claim made, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the legal notice served by the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The respondents may release only those benefits to which the petitioner is entitled to despite pendency of charge sheet. June 03, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE