IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18288 of 2010 SURENDRA PASWAN, Son of Late Ganga Paswan, resident of Village- Kalwari, P.S. Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur.............................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR............................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 26.05.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 31.10.2009 in a case registered under Sections 366, 376,120(B) of the I.P.C. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegation of committing forceful physical relationship is against Anil Paswan and similar statement was given by the victim in 164 Cr.P.C. statement. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent but no statement has been made in the petition. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the State, Mr. Dashrath Mehta, that the court has assessed the age of the victim as 16 years. Though this submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner has not been controverted that the actual offence has been committed by Anil Paswan. Considering the aforesaid submission of 2 the learned counsel for the petitioner for the purposes of bail only, let the petitioner, Surendra Paswan, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Muzaffarpur, in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 186 of 2008. The learned S.D.J.M., Muzaffarpur, will verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if there is no criminal antecedent of the petitioner as asserted by the learned counsel for the petitioner then only the bail bond of the petitioner will be accepted. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)