IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 2763 of 2010 Date of Decision: 28.10.2010 Suresh Kumar .... Petitioner Versus M/s. Walaiti Ram Sushil Kumar and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. B.S. Bedi, Advocate for the respondents 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondents states that plaintiff- petitioner has not moved an application seeking permission to sue as an indigent person in a format prescribed under Order 33 Rule 1 CPC and no compliance of the provisions of Order 33 Rules 2 and 3 has been made by the plaintiff-petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he shall move fresh application in the format as per the provisions of Order 33 Rules 2 and 3 CPC. In view of the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the opinion that let fresh application be moved by the plaintiff in the format as per Order 33 Rules 2 and 3 and in the event of moving such application that application shall be decided in accordance with law without being prejudiced from any C.R. No. 2763 of 2010 2 observation made in the impugned order. Petition stands disposed of. (ALOK SINGH) 28.10.2010 JUDGE reena