BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Eighteenth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14748 of 2011 1 NARASINGAM 2 KAALAI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 & 2 Vs 1 SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RAMANATHAPURAM DIST 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUPPALAIKUDI POLICE STATION, THIRUVADANAI TK, RAMANATHAPURAM DIST IN CR.NO. 151 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.K.SARAVANAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b) and 332 of IPC and Sections 3(i) of the Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992 in Crime No.151 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police. They have approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Heard Mr.V.K.Saravanan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.K.C.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they havenot involved in any other case of similar nature. He would also submit that they are also having permanent residence and therefore, he would request for the grant of anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the petitioners damaged the side wind screen of the bus, worth about Rs.750/-. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to all the petitioners, of course, subject to certain stringent conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the Judicial Magistrate concerned on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram, and on further condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.750/- to the credit in Crime No.151 of 2011 on the file of the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram and the learned Magistrate is directed to keep the same as Court deposit and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks. 7. The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 18/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1 RAMANATHAPURAM 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RAMANATHAPURAM DIST 5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUPPALAIKUDI POLICE STATION, THIRUVADANAI TK, RAMANATHAPURAM DIST +1. CC to M/S. V.K.SARAVANAN Advocate SR.No.40420 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14748 of 2011 Date :18/11/2011 SMA/21.11.2011/7C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/