1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 213 OF 2004 Shilpa Caterers Pvt. Ltd. ... Applicant Versus Airports Authority of India ...Respondent Mr. Birendra Saraf instructed by M/s. Solomon & Co. for the Applicant Mr. J.S. Saluja instructed by M/s. M.V. Kini & Co. for the Respondent. CORAM: DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. DATE: JULY 8, 2005. P.C. 1. According to Clause 20 of the Agreement, “all disputes and differences arising out of or in any way touching or concerning this agreement except those the decision whereof is otherwise herein before expressly provided for or to which the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act and the rules framed thereunder which are now in force or which may hereafter come into force are applicable shall be referred to the sole arbitration of a person to be appointed by the Chairman of the Authority (the respondent herein)”. 2 2. In view of the aforementioned clause, the learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the Chairman of the respondent be directed to appoint the Arbitrator within four weeks. The prayer seems to be reasonable. I order accordingly. 3. No further directions are necessary. This application is accordingly disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE