IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2649 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2649 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2649 OF 2007 Arun Namdeo Bhise. ... Applicant. V/s. State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Sandeep A. Bhagwat for the applicant. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, APP for the State. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 21st August 2007. DATED: 21st August 2007. DATED: 21st August 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Learned A.P.P. makes a statement that charghsheet has already been filed. It is, therefore, open for the applicant to move regular bail application before the regular court. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that application for regular bail was moved before the Sessions Court, however, the said application came to be rejected. The oral statement does not inspire judicial confidence. Had such application been moved and rejected by the Sessions Court before filing of this application, there would have been some reference to such order of the Sessions Court in the application. Since there is no reference to any such order, there is a reason to believe that no such application may have been moved. If so moved and rejected, not at least before filing of the present application or, if rejected before filing of this application, then this applicant is guilty of suppression of facts before this Court. 4. This application is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE