THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.27250 of 2010 DT.02.11.2010 Between: Smt.Lebeka Uma Maheswari … Petitioner And The District Collector, Kadapa, Kadapa District and others … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri D.Kodanda Rami Reddy Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following ORDER: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in not issuing pattadar pass books and title deeds in favour of the petitioner in respect of lands admeasuring Acs.2.01 cents in Survey No.19 and Acs.1.94 cents in Survey No.22 of Kanamulopalle Village, Siddavatam Mandal, Y.S.R.Kadapa District, as illegal and arbitrary. A perusal of the averments contained in the affidavit shows that the petitioner has purchased the above-mentioned lands in a public auction held for recovery of loans of a cooperative society and that she filed her application for issuance of pattadar pass books and title deeds in the month of March, 2005. That as no action was taken thereon, a fresh application was made on 16.08.2010 to respondent No.4 and that respondent No.3 vide proceedings, dated 20.08.2010, informed the petitioner to attend enquiry on 04.09.2010 and that accordingly, she has attended the enquiry on that day. The petitioner further averred that during the enquiry, respondent No.3 on coming to know that the land was originally an assigned land, has changed his mind and has not been issuing pattadar pass books and title deeds. In my opinion, this writ petition is wholly premature because on the petitioner’s own showing, respondent No.3 has held an enquiry on 04.09.2010. If no further action was taken by respondent No.3 for issuance of pattadar pass books and title deeds, the petitioner should have issued a notice to him demanding to take a decision one way or the other, instead of rushing to this Court in a hurried manner. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as premature. Respondent No.3 shall, however, dispose of the petitioner’s application as expeditiously as possible. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.34802 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Date: 02.11.2010. VGB