[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.173 OF 2007 IN CRI.APPLN.NO.4517 OF 2006 IN C.C.NO.245/P.W./2006 Manoj B.Parekh ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.Jehangir Khajotia advocate for applicant Mr.K.V.Saste A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : MARCH 26, 2007 DATE : MARCH 26, 2007 DATE : MARCH 26, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The learned advocate for the applicant states that two applications i.e. Application No.49/N/2007 and 50/N/2007 have been preferred before the trial Court with the same prayers as made in the present application. He stated that he is only praying that these two applications which have been preferred by the applicant and which are pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, [-2-] 19th Court, Esplanade Mumbai in Case No.245/PW/2006 may be disposed of expeditiously. 3. The learned A.P.P. has informed that these Applications are fixed on 2.4.2007 for hearing before the trial Court. In view of this statement, trial Court shall endeavour to dispose of both these applications by 26.4.2007. Needless to say that the said applications to be disposed of on merits after hearing necessary parties. 4. Application is disposed of. [ V.K.Tahilramani, J.]