IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 303 OF 2010 SMT. BLASINHA INEZ LUIS AND 2 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus SMT. MARIA MINGUELA ANUNCIACAO VAZ AND 6 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. C. A. Coutinho, Advocate for the Petitioners. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 22nd April, 2010 P.C. Heard. 2. The Petitioners are Defendants in Special Civil Suit no. 129/2004/A. Their application has been rejected by the learned Trial Court by Order dated 10.12.2009. Their application was for amendment of the written statement to bring on record subsequent events namely that the Defendants had filed an application before the Mamlatdar for declaration that they are the Mundkars. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in my view, this is not a fit case for interference in supervisory jurisdiction. The Defendants are free to raise an issue of mundkarship in case the existing pleadings permits them to do so or pursue their remedy before the Mamlatdar. 4. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. N. A. BRITTO, J. arp/*