1 ndm 3 caw.445.10 anr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 445 OF 2010 IN REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO. 29311 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4203 OF 2009 Pune Municipal Corporation. ... APPLICANT Vs. Dilip Nivrutti Karanjawane and ors. ... RESPONDENTS -------- Mr. S.M. Gorwadkar for the Applicant. Mr. S.B. Deshmukh for Respondent Nos. 1 to 31. -------- CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATE : 02 nd July, 2010. P.C. 1 This application is filed with the limited grievance that on account of incorrect statement it has been noted in the order dated 26 th August, 2009 that the representation will be considered by the Planning Authority, which means “the General Body of the Corporation”. It is now stated that the Appropriate Authority to decide the representation, would be Municipal Commissioner by virtue of Section 152 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act. In the circumstances, wherever the 2 expression “the General Body of the Corporation or the General Body” appears in the order, it should read as “Appropriate Authority of the Corporation”. Rest of the order dated 26 th August, 2009 to remain as it is. Application disposed of on the above terms. [ R.M. SAVANT, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]