c^^ 003 INTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATISGARHl W. P. N0. OF 2004 PETITIONERS ^*^ ^. ..-•\^> ^ >-•' /-K^ ^ .y ^ .^'^ <<€^ ^' ••' ,^^^' <^A y The National Technological University, a private University defined, Sstablished 85 incorporated Under CG Nizi Kshetra Vishwa Vidyalaya [Sthapana Aur Viniyaman] Adhiniyam, 2002, having its Office at Pachpedi Naka, Lalpur Devpuri Post, RAIPUR [CG] Throughits Registrar T.S.R. K. Sarma, S/o Shri Laxmi Narasimham, aged about 61 years, R/o 470, Samta Colony, Raipur[Chhattisgarh] VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^'Juf^t ^°^ 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan,Raipur [Chhattisgarh] 2. University Grants Commission thru' its Chairman, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110002 [India] WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 _OP_jraiE CONSTITUTION OF INDLA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS. DIRECTIONQR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERS: L^^M 126 +ti*iwi ^»nci» ^ET •^|^l^,u-al<M<i<o.Ri<»)i1<i^x • • • • • <1 • ^••^••^•••'B•:•<</• •<"f'^ ••••••^»• • ./ sn^ST^s (<idtg6i<s) ^200 3nlCT^TRTiiw wyT3n^?Ta?wp .r"'-? Ani'aiii g^rrw[^f^T W^^T D.B; HON'BLE SHRI JUSTIC®A. HON'BLB SHRI DILIP RAOSAHE 23.09.2005 None appears for the petif Mr. Ravindra Agrawal, If Chhattisgarh. Mr. Agrawal states that had challenged the provisio^ Vishwavidyalaya (Sthpana Aur 2004 by which the Chhattis^ (Sthpana Aur Vimyainan) Adhij judgment of Supreme Court in. v. St.ate of ChhattisQarh and A 420, the pro\dsions of Vishwavidyalaya (Sthapana) have been declaTed to be ult therefore this writ petition has After considering the si Agrawal,;we find that this wri and we accordingly dispose of t Sd/- Chief Justice •3iy'":S,2005-20,000 ^ €hNfc^41r14ll*lcoY^'I^vQ <(vi^i< ^3rf^r3IT^?T .PATNAJK. C.J & DESHNUKH, J. ionerfs). .L, has appeared for the State of in this writ petition the petitioner is of Chhattisgarh Niji Kshetra ^iniyaman) Sansodhan Adhiniyam, ^arh Niji Kshetra Vishvv7avidyalaya Ifiiyam, 2002 was amended. By a Ihe cavse of Prof. Yashpal and others lnoth.er reported in 2005 (5) SCC jhe Chhattisgarh Niji Kshetra ^|ur Viniyaman) Adhiniyani, 2002 Ira v~ires of the Constitution and become infructuous. [bmission made by Mr. Ra^rindra petition has become infructuous |ie same. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ^ ^