108 •T'l •^^ u 't^ HI^H COURT OF CHH^mS^RH AT BILASPUR Wr?t Petitlon No.3352/200S CORAM; Hon'bteShn S.ft.Nayak, Chiefjustice <& Hon'ble Shri &.R.D©shmukh,J. Petjtloner ResDondents Mohanbl Rathore, S/o Soranath Rathore, Post Afried. Thana Saragaon, Oistt". Janjgf'r-Champa (CG) Versus 1. State of C.6, through Secretar^» Oepartment of Home, D.K-S, Bhawan, Raipur. 2. Superlntendent of Police, Janjgir-Champa (ce) 3. Station House Officer, Saragaon, Distt Janjgjr-Champa, Shri P. Diwokar/Sr. Counsel wi1+i Shri Kunal Das otppeors as Amicus Curiae Shri V.V.S.AAurthy, Dy. Advocate ^enera! for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on 20.2.2006) The foliowing ora! order of the Court was passed by 5.R.NAY.4K, C.J. The letter written by AAohanla! Rathore, 5/o Sorcxnath Rathore, resident of Afried coming under the territorial jurisdiction of Sarogaon Police Station in the district of Janjgir-Champa dated 23.5.2005 has been treated as writ petition under Article 226 of tlie Constitutlon of India and notice has ordered to the respondents. Tlie petitioner is the father of one Anjani who was aSJeged to haye been murdered by her in-laws because of her refusaj to fu!fill the demond of dowry. In the letter, it is alleged that though a crime was registered on 21,2,2005, the material witnesses are !eft out in the iist of witnessesand even the marriage C.D, WGS also not recovered. On service of notice, the Investigating Officer4 Shri S.L.Salam has filed sworn affidavit on 5+ September 2005. In para 2 of the affidavit, it ^-^ ^j 109 ^ — is stated that on 19.3.2005, the C.D, with regard to marriage was seized from Vasudey Rathore who is the brother-in-law of the deceased, In para 5 of the affidavit, it is stated that the Sovernment Pleader has already made an application for adding the of two main witnesses hamely Ajay Kumar and Chandrashekhar and a separate application for adding the name of Assistant Sub" Inspector Sayatri Sharma, Tlierefore, in view of all these development, we do not think that 1+iiere is any necessit^ to take any further steps in the writ petition. 2, The WP. is, accordingly disposed of, No costs, Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ^wc