THE HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.24083 OF 2009 Dt.09.11.2009 Between: B.Sadanand ….Petitioner Vs. Andhra Pradesh Road Trnsport Corporation, Represented by its Vice Chairman & Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad and three others. ……………..Respondents O R D E R: The petitioner joined the services of APSRTC in May, 2008 as a Conductor on contract basis. By order dated 23.01.2009, passed by the 2nd respondent, his contract was terminated on the allegation of cash and ticket/operational irregularities. His appeal against the said order was dismissed by the 3rd respondent by order dated 03.04.2009 and the Revision Petition was also dismissed by the 4th respondent by order dated 06.06.2009. Aggrieved by the same, the present Writ Petition is filed contending inter alia that the findings recorded by the respondents 2 to 4 are incorrect and without any basis. The correctness of the findings of fact cannot be examined by this Court in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence, it is not a matter for interference by this Court and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, this shall not preclude the petitioner to work out the appropriate alternative remedy available under law, if so advised. No costs. ___________ G.ROHINI J., Dt.09.11.2009 c.c.in one week. B/o tjs