1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 5425 OF 2009. ( Uttam Madhav Chavan -: versus :- Election Officer and another ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : DECEMBER 15, 2009. Heard Shri A. Sambre, learned counsel for petitioner. Contention is, in election program published earlier on two occasions, borrower members were also permitted to elect non borrower representatives by participating in that election. However, by the impugned communication borrower members are restrained from voting and thus non borrowers will only be elected non borrower representatives. Learned A.G.P. states that by the impugned communication the requirement of voting as contemplated under the Rules has been added and the irregularities which occurred earlier has been corrected. It is not the case of petitioner that by the impugned communication, provisions of Act, or the Rules or the bye laws are violated. The communication itself states 2 that in order to bring the election program and procedure therein is in consonance with the rules, hence the said change has been made. No case is therefore, made out warranting interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed, with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rgd.