IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Contempt Application No. 227 of 2008 Gulsan Nayyar … Applicant Vs Archana Gaharwar … Respondent Sri Ajay Veer Pundir, learned counsel for the petitioner Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner under the Contempt of Court Act on the ground that the respondent has not complied the order dated 10.09.2008 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Application No. 160 of 2004, Baldev Behal Vs State of Uttarakhand & others. 2. On 10.09.2008, this Court passed the following order, which reads as under:- “Sri Alok Singh Senior Advocate learned counsel for the applicant. Sri Ajay Veer Pundir, learned counsel and Sri S.S. Adhikari, learned A.G.A. for the respondents. The ingredients U/s 482 Cr.P.C. are not attracted in the facts and circumstances of the case. The plea raised in the petition may be raised by the applicant before the Trial Court. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed accordingly.” 3. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner at great length as well as going through the impugned order passed by this Court, I am of the view that apparently no contempt of court is made out in this matter. From the perusal of the order passed by this Court, it reveals that this Court has simply dismissed the petition under Section 482 2 Cr.P.C. observing therein that ingredients of Section 482 Cr.P.C. are not attracted. The proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.C. drawn by the City Magistrate, Haridwar were not stayed or disturbed by this Court vide impugned order dated 10.09.2008, therefore, no question of disobedience the order or committing contempt of court does arise. I do not find any reason to issue notice to the respondent, so as to show cause. The contempt petition lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. 4. Accordingly the contempt petition is dismissed in- limine. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) 21.11.2008 ASWAL