THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5097 OF 2009 ORDER: 1 The order dated 17.09.2009 made in I.A.No.734 of 2006 in O.S.No.208 of 2005 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Mehaboobnagar is under challenge. 2 Brief facts are that the petitioner herein instituted the said suit for specific performance of an oral agreement of sale and the defendant put in his appearance, filed his written statement and is contesting the said suit. In the said suit the petitioner filed the said application seeking impleadment of the subsequent purchaser under registered sale deed as a necessary party to the suit. The said application was dismissed by the court below. Hence the present revision. 3 Heard both sides. 4 The main suit is for specific performance of an oral agreement of sale and the petitioner either has to win or to loose the suit on the basis of his own pleadings and evidence. It is not known as to why the subsequent purchaser is a necessary party in the suit. Of course, it is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that it is only to avoid multiplicity of proceedings the said application is filed. 5 This court is unable to understand as to why the presence of the said third party is required to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. If ultimately the suit is decreed on the basis of the pleadings and evidence let in by the petitioner himself then the subsequent purchaser who suffers but not the petitioner to take appropriate legal remedy. Similarly, if the suit is dismissed, the petitioner has to approach the appellate court for his rederessal. 6 In the light of the above discussion, this court is of the view that the order under revision does not warrant interference and hence the revision is dismissed. No costs. --------------- 07.04.2010 Kvsn