IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15605 of 2011 SUBODH (SUBHASH) SAHA @ SUBODH SAHA @ SUBHASH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. The petitioner is main assailant and there is specific allegation against him that he committed murder of the deceased by opening fire but learned counsel for the petitioner seeks bail on the ground that in course of trial, the informant and some other witnesses have not supported the prosecution case and they have not stated about the participation of the petitioner in the alleged crime but I am not at all inclined to release the petitioner on bail because even if the petitioner is in jail, then also the informant as well as witnesses are turning hostile. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Murliganj P.S. Case No. 121 of 2005 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 115(A) of 2006 stands rejected. The learned trial court ought to have noticed this fact that when the informant did not support the prosecution case as to why he was not declared hostile by the prosecution. So, the learned trial court is hereby directed to be more cautious while conducting the trial. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)