IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 14TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 23RD BHADRA 1929 WP(C).No. 27418 of 2007(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ M.A.SAMEED, ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER(UNDER SUSPENSION), K.K.I.P.SUB DIVISION NO.II, KOZHINJAMPARA, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER(IRRIGATION & ADMINISTRATION), OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER(I&A) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.27418 of 2007 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of September, 2007 JUDGMENT Petitioner has been suspended pending enquiry under Ext.P13 order dated 1810.2006. An employee who has been suspended pending enquiry is entitled to seek a review of the same, if there is a change of circumstance, if the investigation is completed or in an appropriate case similarly situated persons have been reinstated in service. 2. Petitioner has sought for revocation of the suspension under Rule 10(6) of the Kerala Civil Services Rules (Classification, Control and Appeals) Rules 1960 vide Ext.P15 and thereafter by Exts.P16 and P17. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. The first respondent may consider the petitioner's claim for revocation of the suspension and look into Exts.P16 and P17 and take appropriate decision in this regard within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioners shall be heard before a decision is taken. V.GIRI, JUDGE css/ : : : :