IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10773 of 2000 Between: P.Venkata Naidu S/o.Swamy Naidu Kharasavalasa BO, a/w Salur S.O., Parvathipuram Division Vizianagaram Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Post Master General A.P.East Region Visakhapatnam. 2 Superintendet of Post Officers ParavtiPuram Division Paravatipuram 3 Sri K.Muralidhara Rao, S/o. Appala Seetharamamurthy, R/o. Kharasavalasa BO, A/w Salur, S.O., Vizayanagaram Dist - 525591 .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to May be pleased to issue an appropriate writ , order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records in OA No.1525/99 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench and quash the order Dt: 29-05-2000 of the Tribunal in the said O.A. and pass such other orders as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.G.ARUNA GAMINI RAMCHANDER Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.SANKA RAMAKRISHANA RAO The Court made the following : ORDER: (Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) When the matter has been taken up for hearing on 21.7.2009, neither the petitioner nor his counsel were present and there was no representation on their behalf. Therefore, the matter was directed to be posted on 22.7.2009 under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Even today also, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’ neither the petitioner nor his counsel are present and there is no representation on their behalf. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. __________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J. 22.7.2009 kpr