IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11684 of 2010 JAI KRISHNA SAH, Son of Bindeshwar Sah, resident of Village- Kanhauli, Ward No. 6, Police Station- Jhanjharpur, District- Madhubani....Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR...............................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 10.05.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a police case registered under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is a bonafide purchaser of the vehicle and he has all relevant documents. From the impugned order, it appears that the original registration documents were not produced during hearing of the anticipatory bail application in the court below. The petitioner has submitted that the driver was unable to produce the documents but all the documents have been annexed with the present application. The other contention is that Section 414 of I.P.C. can not be made out unless the vehicle alleged to be stolen one. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, Jai Krishna 2 Sah, is directed to be released on bail on his surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Birpur(Bhimnagar) P.S. Case No. 41 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul will accept bail bond only when the petitioner will submit the original papers with regard to the vehicle in question. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)