IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 6 OF 2010 VILLAGE PANCHAYAT CALANGUTE THROUGH SECRETARY ... Petitioner Versus THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT I AND ANR., ... Respondents Shri P. A. Kamat, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri J. E. Coelho Pereira, Senior Advocate with Shri S. Karpe, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 30th July, 2010 P.C.:- Heard Shri P. A. Kamat, learned Counsel on behalf of the Petitioner as well as Shri J. E. Coelho Pereira, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of Respondent No.2. By the present Writ Petition, the Village Panchayat has taken exception to the Order of the Additional Director dated 9-11-2009. By the impugned Order, the Petitioner/Panchayat has been only directed to consider the application of Respondent No.2 dated 8-4-2009, and has been directed to grant a license to the Petitioner. In case the Petitioner requires the site plan of the said premises to be run as a restaurant, they are always free to obtain the same from the Respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 has all licenses as set out in application dated 8-4-2009. The application of Respondent No.2 or for that matter, the impugned Order is not shown to be opposed to any provision of law. I am therefore not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition in extraordinary jurisdiction. Shri Coelho Pereira, learned Senior Counsel submits that the site plan of the Panchayat will be submitted to the Petitioner before the direction given by the Additional Director is complied with. Statement is accepted. Petition disposed off. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.