«' ^ CORAM: HIOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH HON'BLE SHRIJAGDISH BHALLA, Ag. CJ. & HON'BLE SHRI DILIP RAOSAHEB DESHMUKH, >). APPELLANT PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Writ ADpeal No. 117 012007 Padum Das, S/o Mahang Das, aged about 32 yeara, R/o V\\\age Murkuta, Tah. Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Board of Revenue, Chhattisgarh Through its MemberJudge, Bilaspur. 2. AdditionalCollector, Bilaspur (C..G.) 3. Sub DivisiQnal Offloer, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Tahslldar, Bilha District Bilaspur (C.G.). 5. Santan Das, S/o Pillu Das, aged about 32 years, R/o VillageChuraghat Tah. Bilha District Bilaspur (C.G.5 Wrjt_Ap5eMunderSectjgn_2Sub^estjon^tt Hiah Court (ADpeal to Division Benchl Act, 2006 ; Present: Shri IndrasenSahu, counsel for the appellant. Shri GouthamKhetrapal, oounsel for respondentNo.5. ORAI-ORDER (Passed on 28" Jyne, 2007) . The foltowing oral order of the Gourt was passed by Jagdish Bhalia, Ag. C.J. The appellant's writ petition'has been allowed by the Hon'ble Single Judge, however, he has oome in this writ appeal inter aiia praying that judgment dafed 23-04-2007 passed by Hon'ble Single Judge In W.P. No. 4285/2004 so far as it relates to.direction of appointment of Kotwar in the ^B'&<^a/o^,--^ /', . . ' . . ' . ' "- • ' '. interest ofjustjce be qyasbe^'—^ We have heard oounsel for the parties and perused the judgment in question. -We do not find that any such direction of appointment of Kotwar has been Issued by Hon'ble Single Judge. We go a step:further jn the :,!!^t,,ii-(,. -z- interest bf justioethat no post shall remaln vacant. Time and again Hon'ble Apex Court has heavily eome downon variousGovemments for ad hoc;sm and in not filling the vacancies permanently. In the light of the above, we do not find any ground for interference with the judgment passed by 1-lon'ble Single Judge. Acoordingly, the writ appeal is dismssed, rmtc1s"5s^v ^B^-°BMmAb DttiP Judge /