IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH JULY 2010 / 8TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 22905 of 2010(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SUBEESH R., S/O.RAMESAN C.M., AGED 21 YEARS, LEKSHMI NAGAR, NEDUNGOTTUM KAVU, CHUNGAM, ERANHOLY P.O., THALASSERY. BY ADV. SRI.K.R.VINOD RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM. 2. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI,SC,COCHI U FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No.22905 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 30th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner sought early declaration of the petitioner's results for the supplementary examination of the 3rd semester of his B.Tech. Degree course. He obtained Ext.P1 judgment from this Court in respect thereof. Pursuant to the said judgment, the results of the petitioner alone were published. The petitioner wanted revaluation of the answer paper. The petitioner submitted application for revaluation. The same was not accepted by the University, is the grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition. 2. The learned standing counsel for the University submits that the results of other students who wrote the same examination would be published only by the end of this month and therefore the application for revaluation in respect of that examination can be accepted only after publication of the results of all candidates who wrote the examination. That is why, the application for revaluation submitted by the petitioner has not been accepted. However, he submits that if this Court so directs, they would accept the application for revaluation, but revaluation can be done only along with other applications for revaluation. 3. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with w.p.c.22905/10 2 the following directions; The respondents shall accept the application for revaluation to be submitted by the petitioner. Hoverer the revaluation need be conducted only after publication of the results of the examination along with similar other applications for revaluation. The revaluation results shall be published within two months from the last date for receipt of applications for revaluation for that particular examination. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge