IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 16 OF 2010 SHRI KRISHNA MUKUND PARSEKAR ... Applicant Versus SHRI MANOHAR TUKARAM PARSEKAR & 9 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. A.F.Diniz, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V. P. Thali, Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 14th September, 2010 P.C. Heard Mr. Diniz, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. Thali, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents. Since the decree challenged in the Second Appeal is of dismissal of the suit filed by the appellant, the question of granting interim relief at this stage in favour of the appellant does not arise. Hence, the application is dismissed. However,it is made clear that the appellant is at liberty to avail of appropriate remedy as may be available to him in law. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA