IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13469 of 2011 KUMAR PAPPU @ SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 13.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner alleged to be the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498A and 494 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The accusations are of demand of dowry and torture. The petitioner denies the marriage with the complainant. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the petitioner pay Rs. 1,000/- per month to the complainant from June, 2011 by depositing the same in the bank account of the complainant by second week of every month. The petitioner will supply the order of this Court to the complainant when the complainant will give the bank account to the petitioner. The aforesaid payment will be subject to any 2 order being passed in the matrimonial or maintenance proceedings. The aforesaid payment will have no bearing on the claim and counter claim of the parties. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Complaint Case No. 570/2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Two consecutive defaults in making payment by the petitioner will give liberty to the complainant to file application for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)