'3^ "4l'4ld^, yTilytc, fa<ni^'i< awwivf an^iw ft-ii*. WT dll^ifl *4 ?«IFBtR•^CI Sil^ +i<itd4f-f "iHdi iift^& <(<its;i< ^r <MR|*I <rii^?f APPLiCANTS: PETITIONERS 9. 10 Mahendra Kumar Tiwarf, aged about 70 years, son of Late Brlj ihushan Tswari Satish Shai-ma, aged about 45 years, s/o Late Manohar Lal Smt. Damyanti, Wife of Mahim Tiwari, aged about 34 years, Mukul Tiwari, aged about 70 years, son of Late Brij Bhushan Tiwari Praful! Sharma, son of Ram Sahay Tiwari, aged about 54 years, Vidyanand Tiwari, aged about 73 years, son of Late Chhabi Ram Tiwari Ashvrani Sharma, aged about 57 years, son of Late Harikrishna Tiwari — Satanand Sharma, aged about 75 yeare, son of Late Ram Tiwari Surya Kumar Tiwari, aged about 70 years, son of Late Bali Ram Tiwari Ram Sevak Tiwari, aged about 72 years, son of Late Ba!i Ram Tiwari. / ?IT(R;tT^*?ga»ll»wltW-li^'lM—FS/9S—11/2008—1,00,000. ^i i: T sn^'^T'f^N? 'srar <tn^?i »*ii<h '3^'^iraRPT, ®Tl|y<16,fsldl^y dll^Sfl 'q^SR' (<jqi^«i<,e|') swpa? tif^d 4fi^?i J?_ W(f<"l<fl-f *<Wrif ^ fest <t»it(i< C^ ^'siRinsn^i 12 13 j-APPLICANTS: RESPONDENTS 1. 2. Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Shri Kasif Shakeel, couns^ Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Sharma, aged about 77 years, son of Late Chhabi Saikrishna Sharma, aged about 87 years, sonof Late Bali Ram Tivrari, Shaskar Tiwari, aged about 44 years, son of Late Goverdhan Tiwari. All residents of Brahman Para, (Chhattisgarh) ^ersus- Municipai Corporation, through the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Collector, Ralpur (Chhattisgarh) c^iunsei for the applteants. for respondent No.1. for respondent No.2. LawVer One extra copy of the pe1|tion along with annexure be supplied Shri Kasif Shakeel. rQv iN'CTIplWl (W-lis'IM—FS/9S—11 /2008—1,00,( dil4<l ^I Rt-li* ws sn^?i st)*i Barv'e 'S'ss -^wKf<i, w^iww, hwwy. ~afKW 1WO 6«Iiq<^f^tt 4tl^"l(l -3- evahces subseqitentiy The applicants have fil order dated 3-3-2008 passed it Learned counsel for thel (C) No.4389/2007 was dispo^ petitioners to fi!e appropriate Act for redressal of their ari. The above order was p^ theparties. However, between the petitioners anc| redressed only by the Act. In these circumstances, tlli modified by substituting Acquisition Act mentioned in p; The prayer is not respondents. Accordingly, prayer is al| in place of Land Acquisitton A^ Municipal Corporation Act be The appiication is accord ^H'^d-ll1'':( 41i<<?iy'^ fel<l 'lf^t^K ^ ^n <ni^( this appiication for modification of the 1 WP(C)No.4389/2007. applicants submitted that Writ Petltion )4ed of by thls Court wlth liberty to the |application under the Land Acquisition before the competent authority. s^ssed as per the submissions made by i, it was discovered that the dlspute the Municipal Corporation can be oifation under the Municipal Corporation tl^e order dated 3-3-2008 may be suitably ?al Corporatlon Act in p!ace of land |ra-2ofthe order. o^posed by learned counsel for the |owed and in the wSer dated 3-3-2008, mentioned in para-2 of the order, the slibstltuted. ^-. jlngly disposed of. "^'y '.•?<t Sdl'- ..^^•. U\flxe.e^^"T; ^