ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION NO. 13 OF 2009 PETITION NO. 13 OF 2009 PETITION NO. 13 OF 2009 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 8992 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 8992 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 8992 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.Kumar Vaman Paranjape, Petitioner in person. Mr.S.N.Chandrachud for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 24th February, 2009 : 24th February, 2009 : 24th February, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The Review Petition is filed against the order dated 28th November, 2008. By consent, heard finally. 2. As noted, the Petition is already allowed. In the result, the prayer clause (a) is granted which includes all the orders. Therefore, the Trial Court to pass reasoned order on Exhibit 219 in Civil Suit No. 346 of 2002. Once the basic order goes, the orders passed by the Appellate Court in view of grant of prayer clause as referred above, also ( 2 ) goes. 3. By consent, the parties to appear before the Small Causes Court, Pune, on 18th March, 2009 at 11.00 a.m., before whom the suit is pending. The Trial Court to pass appropriate order accordingly after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties. 4. In view of this, now there is no question of passing any reasoned order by the Appellate Court. 5. The Review Petition is accordingly disposed of. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]