IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.1800 of 2008 Between: B. Anginamma W/o B.c. Govindappa R/o D. No. 10-A/315, near Market, Kalyandurg, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Executive Engineer, Rural Water Supply, Penugonda Division, Anantapur District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer/ cum land Acquisition Officer, Dharmavaram, Anantapur District. 3 The Tahsildar, kalyandurg, Anantapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, or direction, more particularly issue one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 & 3 not finalising the land acquisition amount in respect of S.Y. no. 471-1A, Admeasuring a Extent of Ac: 4.41 cents &in Sy. No. 294-A, Admeasuring an extant of Ac: 0.25 Cents at Ontimeddi Village,Kalyandurg Mandal, Anantapur district after acquiring the petitioner patta land, and after starting of construction of the sumps and pump-rooms, in the petitioner patta land is illegal, unjust capricious and consequently direct the respondents to pay the land acquisition amount in respect of S.Y. no. 471-1A, Admeasuring a Extent of Ac: 4.41 cents & in Sy. No. 294-A, Admeasuring an extant of Ac: 0.25 Cents at Ontimeddi Village,Kalyandurg Mandal, Anantapur district forth with. Counsel for the Petitioner: KOTHAPALLI RAM MOHAN CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.1800 of 2008 ORDER: Sri Kothapalli Ram Mohan Chowdary, learned counsel for the petitioner, addressed a letter dated 11.04.2008 to the Registry stating that the Joint Collector directed the respondents to finalise the land acquisition proceedings and also to pay compensation to the petitioner and therefore, the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition. Hence, he requested to post the writ petition under the caption ‘for withdrawal’. In the light of the statement in the letter dated 11.04.2008, permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, it is made clear that if no compensation is paid to the petitioner, petitioner is at liberty to approach this court for redressal of his grievance. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 15.04.2008 Note: Furnish C.C. by 18.04.2008. (B/o) sh