^ IN 3SE HGH^BI.BHieH eOURT OF CHHATIISGARH AT BIlASJPUR W.P.No. 2-^4-1- /0& Pettttoner - ^' ~ ^ .^y ' /"^9/ ^ ^/1'^/ ^Re^QQdeats— ' ^.^" ~ {?' <^^\ ^;'v^? .0 Nagfiadra KuBar Shrlvasteva Aged yrs. 9/o lateShri C.P. Sbri.vastava, Bc-Baral Bev. Asstt. Aklkrit ASlwasi Sugdha Vikas pariy0jna,Kanker. 9/o Sanoay Nagar, Kasker (astt. Kanker). Versus. (1) State Govt. ot C.S. Ibrougb - The Secretary Sairy Developaent D@) t-b., B.K.S. Bhav'an, RAIPUR (C.G.). (2) Ifenaglflg la.rec-tor, teiry feasaQgb, . i Zone-2, taai'ana PrataP Hagar, ; BHOPAL6.P.). (3) State ®ovt.of G.S. Sa'oaghw.TheSecretary. (pAiyu CMIU-WA: B^)tt^ • fi.R. S. Bha^a. EAIPURi(e.G.). K Wrlt PetitlonHnderjAr-fcl.Gle^ 226/227 ol the jeonstll'tte-fcj.oE ^.^- \^. l^i(*u t». o£ Inaia^ 1111^. ^""y XI-HC-22, ^ -TB •?2(pn?Pt 'S^PI®,ft'iwy 'o- '(IHRff-Wliar' 200 R*<yi" 3ii^si,:t:Eaiwiift^ -9-: ShiiaAjay'SfariYasta.va,AdYo^ :' -Shfi; SudturiAgawal, .P.L.,fbi|' -^•^" Hea^. :. l Counsel fbrthe petifioner sut^ the petitioner &r|transfer.ofthe r{ dismissed m defaalt,. and the reeor4 for restoratioa, &om State Admims)i submits that the ease was originallj Tribunal and now-fhe Acthas comel Court, whictr will have jurisdkrtion b The prayeras nut opposed. Having this eonsidered th?»i O.ANo.79/1997, which was disnliss M.A.No.34/200l,;whichwasfiteaf(l Court. ~ •• • '^ . . . CerttfiedcQpy aspermles. Copy to the State counsel. ate for Ihe petitioner. Ifhe State. ' '=bW[s'l41-l tlHdTTi'fe^><l'si%i< ^atiidN^I^CT tnifs that tliis petiti.on has been filed by icord of O.A.No.7.9/1997, which was ofXA.No:34/20Dl, which was filed t^tive. Tnbunal tolflie Hi.gh Court. He fded before the State Adnunistrative [mto force; thereforfe, itwill bethe High 'hearthecase; • tettfion is allowed! Let tKe record of; lissed io defauft, iand the record af'j restoration, be'trSnsferFed:to.theHighi Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge '%& ^s,!i "^s ^..-•^ -VM