:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 714 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 714 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 714 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 715 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 715 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 715 OF 2006 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S.N. Kantawala and Mr. Vikram Choudhary i/b Mr. Vivek Sharma for the applicant. Mr. H. V. Mehta with Mr. K.B. Rao for Respondents 2,3,4, and 6. Mr. P.A. Pole, APP for the State. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 17TH AUGUST, 2006 DATE : 17TH AUGUST, 2006 DATE : 17TH AUGUST, 2006 P.C. . This Court has recorded very clearly in its orders passed from time to time that the matter is still pending before the Settlement Commissioner. 2. This fact is not disputed by Mr. :2: Mehta appearing for respondent No.2. In the light of the fact that the proceedings are pending before the Settlement Commissioner, it would be appropriate to direct the respondents to give 72 hours’ prior notice before any further steps are taken by them in the matter. Since the matter is pending before the Settlement Commissioner, Mr. Mehta has no objection to this Course of action and needless to state that after the proceedings before the Settlement Commissioner are concluded and in case respondent No. 2 desires to proceed further and arrest the applicants, he would give 72 hours’ prior notice to enable the applicant to take out appropriate proceedings. All the contentions of both sides are expressly kept open. . Application is disposed of with liberty. :3: ( S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) ( S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) ( S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)