IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2009 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1930 RSA.No. 1115 of 2007(G) --------------------------------------- AS.51/2002 of ADDL.SUB COURT, ALAPPUZHA OS.711/1986 of PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ALAPPUZHA .................... APPELLANT/ADDL. 2ND APPELLANT/ADDL.R9/ADDL.DEFT: AMRITHAKUMARI, D/O.THANKAMMA, PURAKKANDANCHIRAYIL, NEHRU TROPHY WARD ARYAD SOUTH VILLAGE, AMBALAPUZHA TALUK. BY ADV. SMT.C.G.BINDU SMT.C.G.AJITHA SMT.SEEMA.E.GEORGE RESPONDENTS/R1-8 &10-14/ADDL.P2-5 & D2, 4-6: 1. KOCHIKKA LAKSHMI RRESIDING AT PANDARACHIRA MURI, NEAR NAZARETHU MOSQUE, KUMRAKOM P.O. 2. KOCHIKKA SREEMATHI, RESIDING AT PALLICHIRA, NEHRU TROPHY WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 3. KOCHIKKA NALINI, RESIDING AT ENUVELIKADU HOUSE,VADAYAR, VADAYAR P.O., VAIKOM. 4. KOCHIKKA SUKUMARI RESIDING AT VELAMCHIRA, MUHAMMA P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 5. P.G.RAGHAVAN, RESIDING AT PALAPPALLIL HOUSE, NEHRU TROPHY WARD, ALAPPUZHA-5. 6. AMMINI, W/O. GOVINDAN SAHADEVAN, THAZHAKATHU PARAMBU, CHAMMANKAVU, PAZHAVEEDU, ALAPPUZHA. 7. PADMAJA, D/O. GOVINDAN SAHADEVAN, THAZHAKATHU PARAMBU, CHAMMANKAVU PAZHAVEEDU, ALAPPUZHA. 8. PADMAKUMAR, S/O.GOVINDAN, THAZHAKATHU PARAMBU, CHAMMANKAVU PAZHAVEEDU, ALAPPUZHA. 9. ANIRUDHAN, S/O.DHANANJAYAN, NADUVILE MURIYIL, VANDANAM, ALAPPUZHA. 10. JAGADAMMA, D/O. DHANANJAYAN PALAPPALLI VEEDU, PUNNAMADA WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 11. ASOKAN,S/O.DHANANJAYAN, NADUVILE MURI, VANDANAM, ALAPPUZHA. 12. SOBHANA,D/O. DHANANJAYAN, NADUVILE MURI, VANDANAM, ALAPPUZHA. 13. BHARGAVI,W/O.DHANANJAYAN, NADUVILE MURI, VANDANAM, ALAPPUZHA. ADV. SRIR.AZAD BABU FOR R.1 TO 5 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.P. Balachandran, J. -------------------------- R.S.A.No.1115 of 2007 -------------------------- JUDGMENT When this Regular Second Appeal came up before this Court in the defect list on 13.2.2009 as service to the 12th respondent was not complete, counsel for the appellant submitted that memo furnishing the correct address of the 12th respondent will be filed positively tomorrow, namely, on 14.2.2009. counsel for the appellant submits that though on 14.2.2009 a memo furnishing the correct address had not been filed, such a memo was filed on 26.2.2009. It is seen that the memo filed on 26.2.2009 is submitting that process to 12th respondent has to be served in the present address already furnished. This is not the proper way of doing things and the appellant has not complied with any direction or undertaking. This Regular Second Appeal is, hence dismissed for default. 4th March, 2009 (K.P.Balachandran, Judge) tkv