IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13773 of 2010 AMERIKA SINGH SON OF LATE BARHU SINGH, RESIDENT OF LAKHICHAK P.O.- REPUR KOL BIGHA, P.S. CHANDI, OLD DISTRICT- PATNA, NEW DISTRICT- NALANDA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SARAN NAHAR DIVISION, GANDAK YOJANA, MAIRNWAN, SIWAN 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SIWAN ----------- 2 26.08.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 30th November, 2004 from the post of Dak Runner under the respondent no.2, the petitioner is not receiving the correct pension and other retiral dues which would be evident on perusal of the letter contained in memo no. 359 dated 5th July, 2007 issued from the office of the Accountant General to the respondent no.2 requesting to send the copy of the office order granting A.C.P. to the petitioner and returning back the service book after making the necessary endorsement. It is submitted that for want of above information the petitioner is receiving the pension on the old scale. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the - 2 - pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a fresh and detailed representation before the respondent no.2. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled without delay and the petitioner may start receiving the correct amount of pension admissible to him under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)