CWP No.1940 of 2008. 17.10.2008.Present: Mr. B.S. Attri, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. It is the admitted case of the petitioner that the petitioner does not belong to the feeding area. It has also been asserted on behalf of the petitioner that even opposite party No.4 also does not belong to the feeding area, therefore, opposite party No.3 should have asked for the relaxation. In view of the statement made on behalf of the petitioner, we do not find any reasonable ground to show interference under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India against the orders passed by the two Courts below, which had rightly held that the petitioner does not belong to the feeding area. In light of the above, the petition is dismissed and so also the pending application. However, it is clarified that this order will not come in the way of the petitioner to take appropriate remedy for making a prayer for relaxation. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. 17th October, 2008. (Kuldip Singh), J. (tr)