1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 4692/2007 (Ramesh Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 19/09/2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. M.K.Garg for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and challan papers. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that it was injured Ganesh who caused injuries to the petitioner's son namely Nathu and it also appears from the statement of injured that the petitioner asked him as to why he inflicted injury to his son, on which he started running and there was a quarrel between two. There is no allegation that the petitioner was armed with any weapon. Be that as it may, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Ramesh S/o Delia be released on bail in FIR No. 105/2007 P.S. Loharia, district Banswara, provided 2 he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP