IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI TUESDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2008 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 20218 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- JOBAI, S/O.ANTHONY, AGED 42 YEARS, THANDAPPILLY HOUSE, TRAMWAY ROAD, CHALAKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.ABDUL RAHIM SRI.K.A.SHAMSUDEEN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM RURAL, (ALUVA), ALUVA .P.O. 2. THE CIRCLE OF POLICE, ANGAMALI POLICE STATION, ANGAMALI. 3. BIJU.P.THOMAS, S/O.THOMAS, PANIKKULAM HOUSE, NEAR MOTHERS RICE MILL, CHAMBANNOOR, ANGAMALI SOUTH (P.O), ANGAMALI. 4. MRS.LEENA, W/O.BIJU.P.THOMAS, PANIKKULAM HOUSE, NEAR MOTHERS RICE MILL, CHAMBANNOOR, ANGAMALI SOUTH (P.O), ANGAMALI. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.20218/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE PARTNERSHIP DEED DT.23.4.2005. EXT.P2: COPY OF DEED RE-CONSTITUTION DT.18.7.2007 EXT.P3: COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF PARTNERS DT.10.9.2007. EXT.P4: DECLARATION EXECUTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 20.7.2007. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.983/07 OF THE PERUMBAVOOR POLICE STATION. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE ORDER ON BAIL APPLICATION NO.734/08 DT.8.2.2008. EXT.P7: COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.NO.478/07 BEFORE THE SUB COURT, N.PARAVOOR. EXT.P8: COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.228/07 OF ANGAMALI POLICE STATION. EXT.P9: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED TO MALA POLICE STATION DT.26.3.2008. EXT.P10: COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT RECEIPT ISSUED FROM MALA POLICE STATION DT. 26.3.2008. EXT.P11: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FROM THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT.1.7.2008. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.20218 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of October, 2008 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~~~~ Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioner has approached this court alleging that the police officers are harassing him at the instance of respondents 3 and 4. The 3rd respondent was the erstwhile business partner of his firm. 2. The learned Government Pleader, upon instructions, submitted that the 3rd respondent filed a complaint before the police. The police tried to contact the petitioner to dispose of that complaint, through telephone. But, the petitioner has not responded to the said intimation, it is submitted. The learned Government Pleader further submitted that the police have no intention to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. In view of the above submission, the writ petition is closed. (K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) ps