IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39686 of 2008 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 24.09.2008 Record placed on mentioning by petitioners’ counsel. It is submitted by the petitioners’ counsel that in this case, bail prayer had been made on behalf of accused petitioners Rajesh Kumar Singh and Bambam Singh. It is pointed out by the learned counsel that vide order dated 16th September 2008, both the petitioners, namely, Rajesh Kumar Singh and Bambam Singh were allowed bail but in the bail order of the date i.e. 16th September 2008, the name of only Rajesh Kumar Singh was mentioned and the name of Bambam Singh who too was granted bail, has been left to be mentioned. In this context the Secretary who typed the order has given his report that on perusal of the dictation book he finds that accused-petitioners Rajesh Kumar Singh and Bambam Singh both were granted bail but mistakably name of accused Bambam Sisngh was left to be typed when the bail order was typed. In view of submissions of the learned counsel 2 and the report of the Secretary concerned, the order dated 16th September 2008 is modified to the extent that in the last Paragraph of the order dated 16th September 2008, name of accused Bambam Singh will also be deemed to be mentioned, after the name of accused-petitioner ‘Rajesh Kumar Singh’ as amongst the accused who has been granted bail by this Court. Jay/ ( C.M.Prasad,J )