SBCWP No.1471/2009 Rani Dan Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. 1 SBCWP No.1471/2009 Rani Dan Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : - 25.2.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Rakesh Arora, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is aggrieved against the order dated 24th Sept., 2008 by which the petitioner's application for framing additional issue was rejected by the trial court. As per the case of the petitioner Bhanwar Lal was the owner of the property in dispute, whereas according to the petitioner the non-applicant submitted that Prabhu Lal was owner of the property. The first issue is that whether Bhanwar Lal is owner of the property. The trial court held that in that issue, the plea of the defendant is covered. I do not find any illegality in the impugned order passed by the trial court and no other point has been argued. SBCWP No.1471/2009 Rani Dan Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. 2 In view of the above, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-