THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CONTEMPT CASE No. 601 OF 2011 Dated: 18.10.2011 Between : Smt. K.Ramalakshmi … Petitioner And Sri P.Balakrishna and another … Respondents The Court made the following:- THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CONTEMPT CASE No. 601 OF 2011 ORDER: This contempt case is filed alleging violation of an interim order dated 29.04.2011 passed by this Court pending Writ Petition No.10642 of 2011. The said order reads as under: “In the meanwhile, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent- Corporation to consider the petitioner’s representation dt. 10-1-2011 with regard to the alleged unauthorized constructions being made by the 2nd respondent and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from today.” It is alleged that after the said order was passed by this Court, the petitioner made a representation dated 03.05.2011 requesting to implement the orders passed by this Court. However, the 1st respondent failed to consider the same. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the 1st respondent, it is stated that in fact the premises in question was owned by a group of people namely S.Rasool Khan, Smt. S.Naseem Khatoon, S.Ahmaddula Khan and S.Azam and even prior to filing of Writ Petition No.10642 of 2011, they made an application under the Building Penalisation Scheme for regularization of the constructions made by them. On enquiry, it was found that the said building was constructed deviating the approved plan and also encroaching upon the K.C.Canal. After calling for a report from the Irrigation Department, a show-cause notice dated 17.03.2011 was issued to the said owners regarding the encroachment upon the K.C.Canal and also making constructions in deviation of the approved plan. They submitted a reply dated 21.03.2011. That apart, they also filed Writ Petition No.8683 of 2011 and this Court by order dated 01.04.2011, directed to maintain status quo. Hence, no further steps could be taken. It is also brought to my notice that subsequently, Writ Petition No.8683 of 2011 was disposed of by this Court by order dated 18.07.2011 with a direction to the Corporation to consider the reply/explanation dated 21.03.2011 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law and not to demolish the structures till such time. From the stand taken in the counter affidavit, it is clear that there is no deliberate violation by the respondents and that appropriate steps have been taken by them in compliance with the directions of this Court. Hence, the Contempt Case is devoid of merit and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 18.10.2011 Ivd