IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 8842 of 2008. Decided on: 13.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Hem Raj. … Petitioner. Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Respondent No.4 ex-parte. Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.5. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Petitioner has secured 46 marks and respondent No.5 has secured 46.5 marks. Suitability of both the candidates has been gone into by the duly constituted Selection Committee. Moreover, the Gram Vidya Upasak Yojna, 2001 has been scrapped. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 13, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?