IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35869 of 2011 Dilip Kumar Singh son of Ram Balak Singh, Resident of village-Ghoshrama, P.S.-Hayaghat, District-Darbhanga. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 24.10.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 498(A), 379, 407 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted that though there is allegation of subjecting the informant to cruelty for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. There is no chit of paper to support the allegation that any physical injury was ever caused to the informant. Referring to the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge while rejecting the application for grant of anticipatory bail of the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Sessions Judge after perusing the case diary has clearly observed in the order that allegation under sections 307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code has not been corroborated. It is also submitted that the informant left the petitioner’s house with her on free will and instead of going to parents` house she went to aunt’s house leaving her minor child aged about two years who is at present living with the petitioner. Taking into consideration the aforesaid submissions let the petitioner named above in the event of arrest or surrender before 2 the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/communication of the order be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Darbhanga in connection with Hayaghat P.S. Case No.63 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Md.S. ( Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)