IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-35287 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 07.10.2010 Ajay Kumar and another ...Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Sandeep S. Majithia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shilesh Gupta, D.A.G., Punjab **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel has reiterated that since the charges under Section 307 IPC have already been framed against the accused in this case, so, the matter cannot be compounded, in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case Manoj Sharma v. State & Ors 2008(4) RCR (Criminal) 827. 2. Faced with the situation, learned counsel intends to withdraw the instant petition to enable the petitioners to raise all the points involved in this petition at appropriate stage before the trial Court. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Needless to mention that, the petitioners would be at liberty to place on record the compromise and the trial Court will consider it as a mitigating circumstance for deciding the main case in accordance with law, as the petitioners are stated to have already withdrawn the complaint filed by them in pursuance of the compromise. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge October 07, 2010 naresh.k