c^- \ <INCt£BEWCH IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER W.P.(SINO. ^3^^/2011 [u. Sunita Nagesh, D'/o Peelu Ram Nagesh, aged about 27 ^^3' -„-„_ „.„.„.. ^ l^-^':^:-" ^••.•^".'.'..^^ ...-•"/Cf;^" ...^ .^.y;;:....^ .^•^ ^-- ^^v RESPONDENTS years, working as Forest Guard, posted at Jagargunda under range office Jagargunda, D.F.0. Dantewada (C.G.). VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh- Through :- The Secretary, Forest Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Conser^ator of Forest, Aranya Bhawan, Medical College Road, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.). 3. Divisional Forest Officer, Sukma, Distt. Dantewada (C.G.) WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. HIOH COIJRT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BII ASPU'R PETmONER WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5367 of2011 Kii. Sixmta Nageslz RESPONDENTS VRR8IJS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PE1ITION LTNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrrOTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Sbri N.K.CIiattCTjec, Advocate fbr tfae pet.itioner. Sliri ShasliaiA. Th.akur, Paiiel Lawyer Ibr liie Slale/respondesils, OR D E R (Passed on 12th day ofSeptember, 2011) 1. L/eamed coimsd appearing for tlie petitioner sybmits that vide order dated 15,07;2010 (AjiD.exi.ire P/l). the petitioiier, workisig as Forest Guard at. S^age Jagargimda. Forest. Division Siakma., has beeri tramferred Range. Dasitwa-da.. Forest Division^ Dantewada^ 0!i her own request. However^ the petitioiier has not yet been relieved to join the new pla.ee of posting. Shri Chatterjee submite that once the order oftraasfer hm been passed, it m for the govemment to ensiire tha-t it is complied with isiimedia.tely, He relies on a decision of the Siipreme Coyrt iii Sreedam Chandra Ghosh v. State ofAsm-m & others^ in support of his contention that iftte order is not complied with, a. directioii can be issued for eiifbrcement thereof 2, Leamed coimsel a-ppearmg. for the State/respoBdents sybmits that tiiat ifthe transfer order dated 15.07.2010 (Amiexiire P/l) is st.ill m existence a.nd has not been. complied witk appropriate stq?s would be t.a.ken t.o comp.ly with the order. 3, 'Ifthe aforesa.id tra-mfer order m still in existeac^, the govCTimieBt is iisider an obligation to comply with the same at oiice. It is a-ccordmgly directed that the traasfCT order shall be eomplied with forthwith, withm a period oft-wo weeks, — 4, Accordingly^ this petition is disposed of Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge (1996)108cc567