--A HIGH CX1URT OF CHHATTISeARH. BILASPUR W.P.(SI No. 6175 of 2007 PETITIONER Maheshwar Singh Jaisindhu, s/o Shri Laclian Singh Jaisuidhu, aged about 39 years, occupatioa Uppcr Division Teacher posted at Govenuaent High School, Sihawa, Distt. Dhamtan (C.G). Versus RESPOHDBNTS 1. State of Chliattisgarh, tfarough the Secretaiy, Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Maatealaya, Raipur (C.G). 2. Comnussioner, TrBial Welfare, Ravishanker Universily Caiapus, Raipur (C.G) 3. Assistaat Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, CoBectorate Cainpus, DhEuntan, D^tt. Dhamtari (C.G). '7" ;/^», WRIT PETITION tmDBR ARTICLE 226 OF THB COMS'nTUIOH OF IMDIA Appearaace: Sint. Hamida Siddiqui, counsel for the petitioner. Ku. Sunite Jain, Panel I^amyer appears for the State/ Respondents on advauce copy. ORAL ORDER (17.10.2007) 8UNIL KUMAR 8INHA. J. Heard on adiuission. Leamed counsel for fhe petitioncr axglies that ttie petitioner is working on tlie post ofUpper Division Tcacher and in tbe gradation list published on 01.4.2007, the naine ofthe petitiouer finds place at. Serial No.38 wUereas according to the leamcd counsel for fhe petitioner, the seniority of the petitioner has to be fixed just above Serial No.5 i.e., above the name of Minesh Agrawal. Leamed counsel for the petitioner sutoiuits in this regard;, a representetion has already been subinitted vide Annexiire P-5 on 23.5.2007 but no decision has been taken on the said ^ W.P.(S1 Wo. 6175 of 2007 £' --.-•-^ "u that the respondents be directed to dispose of tlie iiepresentation filed by the petitioaer or he inay lic directed to file a fresh represenlation for correction of the gi-adation list. This liiuited prayer made by leamed counsel for thc petitioner is not opposed by leamed coiinsel for the State. ; The saine is aBowed. This petition is disposed of with a directioii that the petitioner, if so advised, uiay file a fresh representation along- with a copy of this order as also a copy of the writ pefcition filed before this Court within a period of 3 weeks from today and if such a representatioa is ffled, the saine shall be decided w. an objective inanner by ttie concemed aufhority at the earliest, as according to the leamed counsel for the petitioner, the proinotions sas to take place in thc department ancl ifthc saiue is disposed of after fhe proniotion, it naay aflccf the future career offhe petitioaer. With tbe aforesaid o'bservation, fhis petition stends finaUy disposed oCF cj< SunilKumarifinlla Judge | Rao