BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Thirteenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.9951 of 2011 1. A.JEYAPAL 2. DHANALAKSHMI ... PETITIONER'S/ACCUSED NOS.8 & 9 Vs THE STATE REP BY ITS THE SPECIAL SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THATHIENGARPETTAI POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT (CRIME NO. 167/2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. J.JEYAKUMARAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police, for girl missing in Crime No.167 of 2011, the petitioners are before this Court, seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the learned counsel, the victim girl is aged 15 years. In a Habeas Corpus Petition filed before this Court, the girl has been produced and now sent to home. The learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that the first petitioner is the brother of A1, who kidnapped the girl and the second petitioner is the mother of the first accused. 3. Having regard to the fact that an young girl aged 15 years has been kidnapped and her future has been spoiled with the connivance of the first accused, the first petitioner is not entitled for grant of anticipatory bail and hence this petition is dismissed in respect of the first petitioner. So far as the second petitioner is concerned, she is a woman and the mother of the first accused, having regard to her status and that under Section 437 of Cr.P.C., woman enjoying a special status, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the second petitioner alone, but with conditions. 4. Accordingly, the second petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the second petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for the purpose of interrogation. The second petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 13/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THURAIYUR. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY. 3. THE SPECIAL SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THATHIENGARPETTAI POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. J.JEYAKUMARAN Advocate SR.No.35607 SR : 18.10.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9951 of 2011 Date :13/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/