IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Second Bail Application No. 10090/2010 Keptan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan 18.12.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Manish Sharma - for the petitioner Mr NR Saran, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after rejection of first bail application charge has been framed. Looking to the changed circumstances, petitioner may be granted bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. He submits that main witnesses are yet to be examined more specifically Hukma @ Hukam Singh thus petitioner may not be granted benefit of bail. After taking into consideration rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, but looking to the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, bail application is dismissed. Petitioner, however, would be at liberty to file a fresh bail application on recording statement of aforesaid Hukam Singh. Trial court is directed to record statement of aforesaid witness on priority basis, if possible, as a first witness. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma