IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2008 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 37196 of 2008(C) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.K.SIDDEEK, S/O.ISMAILKUTTY, SALEEN MANZIL, VALIYANGADI, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH SEBASTIAN PURAYIDAM SMT.MABLE.C.KURIAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. P.P.MUSTHAFFA, S/O.VEERAN, PALAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, P.O.AMMINIKKADU, MALAPPURAM. 2. P.P.ABUBACKER, S/O.VEERAN, PATHAKKARA.PO PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM. 3. THE SECRETARY, PERINTHALMANNA MUNICIPALITY, PERINTHALMANNA. 4. THE PERINTHALMANNA MUNICIPALITY, PERINTHALMANNA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. SRI. P.K. VIJAYA MOHANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No. 37196 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner's complaint in this writ petition is that respondents 1 and 2 are occupying Government land from which they are liable to be evicted. The petitioner has not stated anywhere in the writ petition as to how the petitioner is personally affected by the action of respondents 1 and 2. If the petitioner has any case that respondents 3 and 4 are doing anything illegal consciously to help respondents 1 and 2, the remedy of the petitioner lies in either filing a public interest litigation or in filing an appropriate petition before the Ombudsman for Local Self Government Institutions. This writ petition has not even been constituted as a public interest litigation. Therefore, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition. W.P.(c)No.37196/08 2 Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file either a public interest litigation or to approach the Ombudsman for appropriate reliefs. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd