IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 11TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 20TH KARTHIKA 1932 RP.No. 982 of 2010(K) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.17508/2010 Dated 07/06/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS IN WPC: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI, S/O.THANKAPPAN PILLAI, AGED 50 YEARS, RADHA MANDIRAM, KARINTHOTTUVA, THURITHIKKARA, KUNNATHUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. MADHUSOODHANAN PILLAI, S/O.CHELLAPPAN PILLAI, AGED 50 YEARS, CHUNAKKIRAYYATHU VADAKKETHIL, PORUVAZHY, KAMBALADI, KUNNATHUR, KOLLAM. BY ADVS. SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR), SRI.P.SREEKUMAR. RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM. 2. DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT OFFICER, KOLLAM. 3. THE EMPLOYMENT OFFICER, TOWN EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE, KUNNATHUR, SASTHAMCOTTA. 4. JAYAKUMAR, NAITHUR PADINJATTETHIL, KANNIMEL, KUNNATHUR TALUK, KOLLAM. 5. MURALI, PALAZHI, KULANGARA P.O., KUNNATHUR TALUK,KOLLAM. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.NARAYANAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ R.P.No.982 OF 2010 IN W.P.(C) NO. 17508 OF 2010 (K) ===================== Dated this the 11th day of November, 2010 O R D E R The writ petition was disposed of by judgment dated 7th of June, 2010 on the basis that none junior to the petitioner have been sponsored. 2. Although in this review petition, petitioner points out that he was senior in the 3rd respondent employment exchange, petitioner has no case that anybody junior to him registered in the 3rd respondent Employment Exchange has been sponsored or appointed. It may be that persons junior to him by date of registration, senior in other exchange may have got sponsored and appointed. However, such candidates cannot be said to be junior to the petitioner whose seniority has to be confined to the Employment Exchange where his name is registered. In that view of the matter, I do not find any ground to review the judgment. Review petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp