^^tl^*<^ L^ )^-°%>/^ <.L^ BEPOmS ,THS, STAIS J©M3NISIRAIIVS IRIBl^ AL PMN CIPAL BBi CH A^ JABALPUR Origiaal Agplicatioei No. K^^"®'°^ 1998, APPLIC^ TS s N (N "APPLIC^ IS t I. Ram Kumar Singh S/oQiendrabhaB. Singh, aged about 38 years, Asstt8@<& Teacher, Middle School, Karra, Block - Ambikapur. ^ 2»Narmdra Singh £/o RamNarayssa Stagh, aged about 57 years, Teacher, Primary School, Kumharta, Block- Ambilcapur, ^, aaffi Kssfawar Ram S/o Paaik Raa, aged about 57 ye&rs, Teacher, Primary-y School, Gelha Chuan Block-Ambikapur 4. Balram S/o Dhota Ram,age^ about 37 years, Teacher, Kaaiisttia(^^a;" ) Primary School Ghaa tadioh, Block- Lakhmpur. 5, Girwar Pras^l Suz'yabaashi £^o ParsottasivRam, aged aboufc 45 years, Asstt* Teacher, Balak (^Y<a>^- ) Middle School, K&tkalo, Block- A^bikapuFe 1 5< Cu. Nimala WasteC^R-^^D/o Roshaalal Waste, a^ed aboufc 4$ years, Teacher, Primary School, Bakalo. 7. Nisha Saiai D/o M»P« Saini, aged about 54 years Teacher Primary School^ Gaiadhi N agar Block- Ambikapur. VSRSUS 1< Stata of Ma^bya Pradesh ^ribal DeFelopment Departraffit,@®BhopalCM.P.). 2, 'Bie Commissicner, Tribal'yevelppmoat Ma&hya Pradesh,.Bhopal, (M»P.). APPLIGATICK ^D^^S£CIiaLJ9 OEi IHE APM3NIS3KA.T1B IRXBIKAL_ACT. ^ <», ®0 ' :-HC-22 ^STT^T^T 'f^ri^s^i $^^i<=^ ^rft^ ^ET -4HH-4, ^Tl1y<i. ^cil'My ,^....^.(7..c^....!.2.^^ fc|<b<ST' 'Rl^^tl ^bNlcb ^ ^RI'^TT^R ^rf^T SBz Hon'ble Shri Maniadr- 8.3.2010 Shri M.K. Sinha, counsel $ Shri Ajit Singh, Paael La^4 It is stated that petitioner of the petition. None for petitioners No. 2 Leamed counsel for th petitioners were appoiated probation, After completion of were graiited regular pay-scale. tliat fhe issue mvolved ia tlie cfc are entitled to regular pay-scale appomtaient or after completiou The issue involved hereiri Pradesh State Adiniiiistrative SAT^ m O.A. No. 2745/89 State ef M.P. Ss others], wher^ situated teachers are entiUed to iaitial appomtmeut. The matte3 Court. The appeal was disniissed^ fhe decision of the SAT to fhe <=blx4fd41r1 iTTR^f ^ ftT^t <F3l^l< ^ N^R 3?TT^T -- ^^v^-.tw^ J. ^r tlie petitioners No. 1, 3, 5 & 6. rerforthe State. ^lo,4 has died duriug fhe pendency fc7. petitioners subinits fiiat the m|tiaUy on a fixed pay-scale on jprobation period, tlie petitioners Learaed counsel furtlier subinits ijse is as to whether tiie petitioners Iwifh efFect from fhe date of mitial |ofprobation period. was considered by fhe Madhya []ribunal, Jabalpur (for short {fhe {Mes^hukant Yadu and S6 others Vs. ?in it was held that fhe similarly jregular pay-scale w.e.f tlie date of was ta3<en up to fhe Suprenie by fhe Suprenie Court, upholdiag |ffect that fhe Teachers/Assistmit r'tt^ if^n ^STT^T^I r<rii<=h ^it^i ^TRW^lft^ % Smlia -yef ^MH-4, ^•d1^1<i. ^clKiy 31T^T 'tRT^? WH^IT 9h^tl<=h "^ 200 ^^sr' 3?n^r'^en^T ^rf^r -L Teachers are entitled to appoisitinent, regi|ilar pay-scale from date of mitial In view of the above disposed of ia fhe same tenijis libeit)r to niake a represeutati^ case on its own nierit aad ui itsl on fhe saaie footiags as p^ Madhukant Yewbi (supra) ad^d Supreme Court in. Special le^ order dated 3.1.1994, the petitijoi accordiagiy. submissions, tlie writ petition is Le,, tlie petitioners are granted 3n, if so advised, to consider fheir perspective, Iffhe petitioners staiid ;r order passed by fhe SAT in subsequently confirmed by fhe [ive Petition (Civil) No.6892/93 by ^ners m.ay be entitled to same reUef The du-ection heremabov^ petitiouers No. 1, 3, 5 & 6. In are concemed, petition shall b| prosecutlou. chl^lid^l'1 'WT^ff'? fe^ <psi^l< ir ^rf^m 3Ti^T has been issued only ia respect of o far as uu-represented petitioners s treated as disinissed for waat of Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Jude f-n^ tfi^