IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2582 of 2011 RABISH KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.4684 of 2011 SUMAN KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner of Cr. Misc. No. 2582 of 2011 is the husband of the Pramukh and petitioner of Cr. Misc. No. 4684 of 2011 is associate of the husband of Pramukh are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 353,504 and 506/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that the petitioners pressurized the informant being the Block Development Officer to issue cheque with regard to installment of solar light. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that occurrence alleged to have taken place on holiday hence, there is no question of offence being committed under Section 353 I.P.C. which is only unbailable offence alleged against the petitioners. It is further submitted that 2 petitioner of Cr. Misc. No. 2582 of 2011 is school teacher and so far as the petitioner of Cr. Misc. No. 4684 of 2011 is concerned, the police found the accusation false against the petitioner and submitted final form. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, Rabish Kumar and Suman Kumar be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No.291 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M., Khagaria, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P. C. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)