1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1354 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.4483 OF 1993 Smt.Lilavati H. Babur .. Plaintiff Versus Narayani M. Sachdev .. Defendant Mr.A.S.Doctor with S.Doshi for applicant None for defendant. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 8th April 2008 P.C. . Mr.Doctor appearing for plaintiff states that the chamber summons has been duly served on the defendants. 2. The sole plaintiff has expired and the applicant is the only heir and legal representative. The applicant is the married daughter of the deceased sole plaintiff. The deceased sole plaintiff expired on 18th May 2001 2 and although the applicant has been representing the deceased sole plaintiff, she has pointed out that on account of her ignorance about the legal procedures, she could not take steps to prosecute the suit. Further, she was ailing for some time. For the reasons that are set out in the affidavit in support, which have not been denied, the chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) on the condition that plaintiff pays costs quantified at Rs.1,500/- to the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority within two weeks from today. Costs condition precedent. On payment of costs and proof being furnished plaint be allowed to be amended within two weeks from the date proof of payment is produced. Needless to state that after the amendments to the plaint, if the plaintiff does not prosecute the same by taking necessary steps in accordance with law, this Court will be constrained to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution. 3 (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)