SAS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.812 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.812 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.812 OF 2008 M/s.Swan Mills Ltd. ..Petitioner. V/s. Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents. Ms.Aparna Hirandagi i/b. M.H.Patil for petitioner. Mr.A.S.Rao wth Rajinder Kumar for respondents. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED : 24TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED : 24TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Rule, made returnable forthwith. Learned counsel for the respondents waives service. By consent of the parties, petition is taken up for final hearing. 2. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 8/01/2008 passed by the Commissioner, Designated Authority, Central Excise, Mumbai-II in so far as it imposes interest on the amount of refund under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme. 3. The issue involved in this petition is - = : 2 : = - covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in Shatrusailya Digvijaysingh Jadeja V/s. Commr. of Shatrusailya Digvijaysingh Jadeja V/s. Commr. of Shatrusailya Digvijaysingh Jadeja V/s. Commr. of Income Tax, Rajkot Income Tax, Rajkot Income Tax, Rajkot [2005 (192) E.L.T. 22 (S.C.) 2005 (192) E.L.T. 22 (S.C.) 2005 (192) E.L.T. 22 (S.C.)] and it is answered against the Revenue. In view of this rule is made absolute. 4. The petition is disposed of. (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)