... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.262 OF 2007 PETITION NO.262 OF 2007 PETITION NO.262 OF 2007 .................................................................. Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. .................................................................. Shri S.V.Sadavarte for the Petitioner. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED: FEBRUARY 21, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Petitioner. By this Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the Petitioner has taken exception to order dated 30th August, 2006 by which the learned Adhoc Additional District Judge has condoned delay in preferring Appeal against the decree passed against the first Respondent. 2. After having heard the learned Advocate for the Petitioner, I find that no case for interference is made out. The delay was of 212 days. Considering the material on record, the Appellate court has come to the conclusion that sufficient cause for condonation of delay is made out. The Appellate Court has awarded costs of Rs.2,000/- to the Petitioner. No case is made out for interference in a Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition is rejected. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE