IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 87 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 91 OF 2009 KADAMBA TRANSPORT CORPORATION LTD THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR S. V. NAIK ... Applicant Versus SHRI. DATTA MAHADEV NAIK AND 6 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. A. R. Kantak, Advocate for the Applicant. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 1st September, 2010 P.C.: Heard. 2. Respondent no.1 is present in person. Respondents nos.2 & 5 who are duly served are absent. Respondents nos.4 & 7 are also duly served and are absent. Respondent no.3 does not appear to have been served. Respondent no.6 has expired as per the report of the bailiff. Appellant to take steps as regards service of respondent no.3 and legal representatives of respondent no.6. 3. As regards Civil Application, it is seen that the award passed against the appellant is to the tune of Rs.3,18,500/-. By order dated 3/11/2009, this Court granted ad interim stay subject to deposit of Rs.1,09,000/- with further observation that the deposit of balance amount would be considered on the next date. On 10/02/2010, this Court ordered another sum of Rs.1,09,000/- to be deposited. 4. The appellant has deposited the said two amounts of Rs.1,09,000/-. Counsel on behalf of the appellant submits that this Court had ordered deposit of the said amounts after going through the judgment/award of the learned MACT and after having been satisfied that the amount of Rs.3,18,500/- was not due and payable to the respondents. However, no such satisfaction has been recorded in the orders referred to herein before. 5. In the circumstances, therefore, the appellant is hereby directed to deposit the balance amount of Rs.1,00,500/-, within a period of six weeks. On the said payment being made, there shall be stay on execution of the award during the pendency of the First Appeal. Civil Application is disposed of with liberty to the respondents to apply for modification of this order. S.O. six weeks i.e.13/10/2010. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH