IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2011 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 10151 of 2011() ------------------------------ CRIME NO.941 OF 2011 OF PAYYANNUR POLICE STATION, KANNUR DT. PETITIONERS/ACCUSED. --------------------------------------- 1. ISHAQ T.P., S/O.HASSAINAR, AGED 24 YEARS T.P.HOUSE, P.O., PALAKKODE, KANNUR. 2. JABBAR T.P., S/O.HASSAINAR, T.P.HOUSE, P.O., PALAKKODE, KANNUR. 3. ASIF T.P., S/O.MOHAMMED, T.P.HOUSE, P.O., PALAKKODE, KANNUR. 4. SUBAIR T.P., S/O.MUHAMMED, T.P.HOUSE, P.O., PALAKKODE, KANNUR. 5. SARA T.P, S/O.MOHAMMED, T.P.HOUSE, P.O., PALAKKODE, KANNUR. 6. UMMER, S/O.MOIDEENKUTTY, T.P.HOUSE, P.O., PALAKKODE, KANNUR. 7. JAMEELA T.P., W/O.USUF HAJI, T.P.HOUSE, P.O., PALAKKODE, KANNUR. 8. MARIYAM T.P., W/O.MUHAMMED KUNHI, T.P.HOUSE, P.O., PALAKKODE, KANNUR. 9. KHADEEJA, W/O.HASSAINAR HAJI, T.P.HOUSE, P.O., PALAKKODE, KANNUR. 10. SUFAIJA, W/O.FAROOQ, T.P.HOUSE, P.O., PALAKKODE, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.I.V.PRAMOD Bail Appl..No. 10151 of 2011() RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT/STATE. --------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA (SI OF POLICE, PAYYANNUR), REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM BY P.P.SRI.K.K.RAJEEV THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. --------------------------------- B.A. No.10151 OF 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of December, 2011 ORDER The petitioners apprehend arrest in Crime No.941 of 2011 of Payyannur Police Station, Kannur District. They state that they are accused Nos.1 to 10 in the crime and the offence alleged against them is under Section 498A read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that accused Nos.2 to 10 were deleted from the array of accused and the crime is only against the husband of the defacto complainant under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor. 4. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of B.A.No. 10151 OF 2011 2 the case, the nature of the offence, the injury sustained and other circumstances, I am of the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the first petitioner. There will be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the first petitioner, the officer in charge of the police station shall release him on bail on his executing bond for `10,000/-(Rupees Ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to the following conditions: A) The first petitioner shall report before the investigating officer between 9 A.M. and 11 A.M. on alternate Mondays, till the final report is filed or until further orders; B) The first petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer for interrogation as and when required; C) The first petitioner shall not try to influence the prosecution witnesses or tamper with the evidence. D) The first petitioner shall not commit any offence or indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail. E) The first petitioner shall cooperate with the investigating officer in the matter of investigation. F) In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be cancelled. B.A.No. 10151 OF 2011 3 The Bail Application is allowed in the manner indicated above, in so far as it relates to the first petitioner, and it is closed as unnecessary, in so far as it relates to petitioners 2 to 10. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE. cms