IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8311 of 2010 SHARDA DEVI, W/O JANAK KUMAR, R/O MOHALLA- BAHADURPUR (NEAR MODEL INTER SCHOOL, SAMASTIPUR), WARD NO.26, P.S. SAMASTIPUR (TOWN), DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,SAMASTIPUR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SAMASTIPUR. 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SAMASTIPUR. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR (TOWN) P.S., DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR. 6. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. 7. THE TREASURY OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 12.5.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It is submitted that the husband of the petitioner retired from the post of Headmaster, Rashtriya Middle School, Dalsingsarai within the District of Samastipur on 1.11.1998 and he was receiving his due pension vide PPO No.294452 till January, 2007. Thereafter the husband of the petitioner went missing and as such after lapse of one year, the petitioner is entitled to receive the family pension as per the Government rule. The learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be considered as per law at the earliest. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the District Superintendent of Education, 2 Samastipur (respondent no.4). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in her representation be considered considering the extant instructions of the State Government expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in her representation may be settled. However, upon consideration, if any of the claims or any part of the claims is found not admissible, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)