IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. '7232 OF 2008. Ranbir Singh, S/o. Keshri Lal, aged about 75 years, R/o. Village Tarpongi R. I. Circle and Tahsil Tilda, Distt. Raipur (C. G.) PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1) Union of India, Through — Secretary Power and Energy Department New Delhi 2) State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C. G.) 3) Executive Engineer of Power Grid Corporation of India Limited office at Distt. Raipur (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT, WRITS, DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER ,~,. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO.7212 OF 2008 EEIJTIONER Ranbir Singh Versus RESPONDENTS Union of lndia & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :— Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Kashif Shakeel, standing counsel for the Union of India. Shri D.S. Surana, Advocate General with Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. Shri D.S. Surana, Advocate with Shri Vaibhav Shukla Advocate for the respondent No.3. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 27m day of June, 2011) Heard learned counsel for the parties. The only prayer in this petition is that without granting adequate compensation to the petitioner the respondent Power Grid Corporation has installed towers on the land bearing khasra No.529/1 area 6.150 hectares situated at Tarpongi, District Raipur. Shri Surana, learned Advocate General appearing for the State as well as for the Corporation/respondent No.3, submits that the petitioner is entitled to compensation and the determination of compensation is under consideration. The same shall be granted as early as possible preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of application made by the petitioner. Thereafter, if the petitioner remains aggrieved he may take recourse to proper forum by raising the dispute before the competent authority/Court. In view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Gowri Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Q, /, Sdl— l ; Agnihotril .Satish K. Judge