IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FA No.748 of 2000 STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR Versus KHADERAN SAO With F.A. No. 749 of 2000 STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR Versus GANESHI YADAV With F.A. No. 750 of 2000 STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR Versus GANESHI YADAV With F.A. No. 753 of 2000 STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR Versus SUDESHWAR DUSADH With F.A. No. 754 of 2000 STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR Versus RAMADHAR SAO With F.A. No. 755 of 2000 STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR Versus NAGINA YADAV With F.A. No. 756 of 2000 STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR Versus RAM NARESH SINGH & ORS With F.A. No. 758 of 2000 STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR Versus RAM NARESH SINGH With F.A. No. 763 of 2000 STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR Versus SIDHESHWAR DUSADH With F.A. No. 765 of 2000 STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR 2 Versus TETARI DEVI With F.A. No. 770 of 2000 STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR Versus MAHADEO YADAV With F.A. No. 771 of 2000 STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR Versus SMT. SUNAINA DEVI With F.A. No. 308 of 1994 STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR Versus BASUDEO SAO With F.A. No. 752 of 2000 STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR Versus NAGESHWAR DUSADH With F.A. No. 224 of 1994 STATE OF BIHAR Versus FULLA DEVI With F.A. No. 122 of 2001 STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR Versus RAMANAND KUMAR MISHRA & ORS With F.A. No. 119 of 2001 STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR Versus SHOBHA KANT JHA With F.A. No. 301 of 1994 STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR Versus RUPAN GOPE With F.A. No. 668 of 1977 STATE OF BIHAR Versus Md. USMUDDIN 3 With F.A. No. 46 of 1993 STATE OF BIHAR Versus SMT. BASURNI DEVI ----------- 5 21.10.2008 Heard counsel for the Appellants in the aforesaid appeals. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant-State would submit that in terms of the notification dated 10.11.2006 as also these appeals are valued less than Rs. 50,000/-, the State would no longer press these appeals and accordingly they may be permitted to be withdrawn. Consequently, all these appeals are permitted to be withdrawn with a direction to the State to pay the amount in terms of the impugned award within a period of six months from today with full admissible amount including solatium and interest thereon till the date of payment as directed under the impugned awards. . With the aforementioned observations and directions these appeals are disposed of. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)