1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2612 OF 2010 Mukhtar Liyakat Ansari and anr. ..Applicants. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ......... Ms.Anjali R.Awasthi, for applicants. Mr.P.S.Hingorani, APP for respondent State. ......... CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. (VACATION COURT) DATE : 26th MAY, 2010. P.C. : This application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, seeking anticipatory bail in the event of arrest of the applicants by Nagpada Police Station for offences punishable under Section 420, 406, 506(II), 34 of IPC in MECR No.1 of 2010. 2] Heard Ms.Anjali R.Awasthi, learned counsel for applicants and Mr.P.S.Hingorani, learned APP for respondent State. 3] The private complaint is filed against the applicant for the offences punishable u/s.420, 406, 506-II r/w.Section 34 IPC. Pursuant to the order passed by the learned Magistrate under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C., statement of the complainant was recorded. I have perused the papers and in particular the said statement. After perusing the papers, I am prima facie satisfied that no case is made out under Section 506(II) of IPC. It is also submitted that the 2612-10.sxw 2 dispute is essentially of civil nature and as a pressurising tactics, the complaint was lodged by the original complainant. After hearing both the sides, I am of the opinion that the interest of justice would be met if the following order is passed :- (a) The applicants be enlarged on bail, in the event of their arrest by the Nagpada Police Station in connection with Crime (MECR) No.1 of 2010, on furnishing bail for Rs.15,000/- each, with like surety. (b) The applicants shall report to the Investigating Officer in the Nagpada Police Station on Tuesday and Friday every week between 4:00 pm. and 7:00 pm. (c) The applicants shall neither tamper with the prosecution evidence nor threaten the witnesses. [R.G. KETKAR, J.] 2612-10.sxw