Contempt Petition No. 382 of 2006 Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Heard Sri K.P. Upadhaya, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State-respondents. Learned Additional C.S.C. made a statement at bar that the order had been complied with. It has been mentioned in the counter affidavit filed by the respondent No.2 that the representation of the petitioner was decided by the respondent No.2 vide order dated 31-1-2007, the copy of the order has been annexed as Annexure CA-1 to the counter affidavit filed by the respondent No.2. In view of the fact that the order had been complied with, the contempt petition is dismissed. Notices are hereby discharged. All applications stands disposed of accordingly. Dated:-26-03-2008 (B.S.Verma,J) M.K.