:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 230 OF 2008 Mrs. Nayana Iccharam Panchal ..Applicant Vs. 1. State of Maharashtra 2. Mr. Gajanan Abhimanyu Golatkar ..Respondents WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 231 OF 2008 Mrs. Nayana Iccharam Panchal ..Applicant Vs. 1. State of Maharashtra 2. Mr. Baliram Appa Shivalkar ..Respondents Mr. Jehangir Khojata for applicant in both the matters. Ms. A.A. Mane, APP for State in both the matters Mr. K.A.J. Merchant for respondent no.2 in both the matters. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. Date Date Date : November 24, 2008. : November 24, 2008. : November 24, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learend Advocate for the applicant - original accused, the learned Advocate for the respondent no.2 - original complainant and the learned APP for the State. The applicant and the respondent :2: no.2 are present in the court. 2. The applicant has been convicted by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 30th Court, Kurla, Mumbai by separate Judgment and Order dated 16/6/2005 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in C.C. No.255/SS/2004 and C.C.No.256/SS/2004. Being aggrieved thereby, appeals came to be preferred. The said appeals came to be dismissed. Hence, these revision applications. 3. During the pendency of the revision applications, the parties have amicably settled the matter and have filed consent terms which are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 4. In view of the consent terms the offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act is compounded in both the cases and the applicant is acquitted therein. The respondent no.2 - Mr. Gajanan Golatkar (original complainant) in Cri. Revision Application No. 230 of 2008 is permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs.7,00,000/- which has been deposited before the trial court. The said complainant is also permitted :3: to withdraw the further amount of Rs.1,00,000/-, which will be deposited in the trial court by the applicant by 5/1/2009. It is made clear that if there is any default on the part of the applicant in depositing the balance amount of Rs.1,00,000/- by 5/1/2009, this order shall be set aside and the revision applications shall stand automatically revived. 5. Revision Applications are disposed of accordingly. (Smt.V.K. (Smt.V.K. (Smt.V.K. Tahilramani,J.) Tahilramani,J.) Tahilramani,J.)