IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1678 of 2010 ====================================================== Virendra Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The High Court of Judicature at Patna & Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shri Prakash Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 14 13-02-2013 This has come at the instance of Mr. Shri Prakash Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pointing out certain typographical error occurring in the order dated 9.11.2011, whereby the writ application was disposed of. It is stated that in the second line of paragraph 3 at page 1 of the order which reads as ‘Smt. Paramjote Kuar, Dharkan Singh and others’ should in fact be read as ‘Smt. Paramjote Kuar vs. Dharkan Singh and others. In similar manner it is pointed out that in the 5th line of paragraph 2 at page 3 of the order the word ‘sale-deed’ should be read as ‘sale certificate’. Prayer is allowed. Let the second line in paragraph 3 at page 1 of the order be modified to read ‘Smt. Paramjote Kuar vs. Dharkan Singh and others’ in place of Smt. Paramjote Kuar, Dharkan Singh and others’ and in similar manner the word ‘sale deed’ Patna High Court CWJC No.1678 of 2010 (14) dt.13-02-2013 2 occurring in 5th line of paragraph 2 at page 3 of the order be modified to read as ‘sale certificate’ in place of ‘sale deed’. The order dated 9.11.2011 shall be deemed to have been pronounced with the aforesaid modifications. SKPathak/- (Jyoti Saran, J)