‘‘lwxw m r ‘ ,¢% ] www M rw‘ @ /\ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVIEW Wm No H§ 12010 Kamkumm: APPLICANT] : Smt. (Rajkumag aged about Respondent no. 7 29 years, W/o Shri Ameshwar, mgw §3§£§§§é¥w Caste Bargah, Occupation-Aganbadi v worker, R/o Chnbnpara, ‘ Post - “"4, Lahpatra, P.S. Lakhanpur, Tahsil I rAmBi'k‘ap‘il‘r, Distt.Sarguja(C.G.) VERSUS the .4, N¢¢Smmam«m4mw t .4; K 1 NON-APPLICANTS .1. Smt Vldyavatl aged about33 Petitioner years, W/o Amar Sal Rajwar, I, Occupation-House Wife, R/o Gram Panchayat Chiibiipara, Puhputra, Post Lahpatra, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) Respondent no 1 to 6 2: The State’of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Distt.. Sarguja (C.G.) 3. District Project Officer i.C.D.S. ( integrated Child Development Scheme ) Ambikapur, Sarguja (C.G.) 4. Project Officer , l.C.D.S. ( integrated Child Development Scheme) Lakhanpur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) 5. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Lakhanpur, Distt.. Sarguja (C.G.) 6. JanpadPanchayat Lakhanpur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) 7. Ram Narayan Rajware , S/o Ramroop, Caste Rajwar, Clerk, R/o Village Bakmer, Post Bhittikala, P.S. Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) @ @ APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF ORDER DATED 8.3.2010 (Arising out of order dated 08/03/2010 passed in W.P. No. 3358/200?by the leahed Single Judge Hon’bie Shri yr“ S.K.Agnihotri J.) Anmécam Nan-aggiicants FAQH COURT OF GHHATTESGARH AT BILA$PUR f REVIEW PETEHQN NO. 11$ Oé‘ 29w @9 Smt. Ramkumar’i Versus $mt. Vidyavati 8: Others APPjHCATiON FOR REWEW OF ORDER DATED 83.2010 ($§ : i-ion’bie Mgr. $atish K, Agmhom, J.) Shri DNFraiapati, Advscate far the applicant. Shri MRSBhatia; Dy. Govt. Advecata for the State. __._..-_-... .....................$.—......".-___--_-.E._—----_--_.._.._ ................................ OV 7 QRQER mmm F§e$em :— {Passed an 8“" day of October, 201G) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the applicant; en insWuc’eons, seeks permission of this Cour? to withdraw this petition, to which ieamed counsei appearing for other side has no objection. 2. it ts ordered. as prayed for. 3. Accordingly; the review petition ts dismissed, as withdrawn. Sdl- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Asnok .