?1?1^; IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Si N0. ^3^6 / 2011 PETITIONER Anjori Ram Deshmukh, S/o. Late Shri Rama Deshmukh, aged about 56 years, R/o. Ashwani Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^^ ^y ...^">y' ^<,^ ,.-'' fy/' ^^•" ^y ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: - Secretary, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 2"^ Director, Revenue Department, Raipur (C.G.) 3. ^ Commissioner Raipur Division, Raipur (C.G.) 4. -'" Collector, Land Record, Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COMSITUTION OF INDIA \^^ EETmQNER COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BjLASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5356 OF 2011 . . Anjori Ram Dsshmukh (•<^>^ RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chha^jsgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satlsh K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Ashj'sh Chaudhari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Sin.gh, Panel La^/yer for the State. ORDER (Passed on this 12th day of September, 2011) A1At the very outset, Shri Singn,. iearned counsei appearing for the State/respondents, on instructions, submits that the order dated 18.08.2011 (Annexure P/1) impugned herein; has not been passed by a competent authority in accordance with Rule 20, Part 11, of the IVIadhya Pr-adesh/Chhattisgarh Land Record iVlanuaj, thus, the same Js unsustalnable In iaw and shaii not be given effect to. In view of the above submission made by iearned counsei, according to learned counsel for tne • petitio-ner, nothing survives for adjudicatlon at this stage. AccordJngiy, the impugned order 18.08.2011 (Annexure P/1) is quashed. However, liberty is reserved to the State/respondents to pass appropriate order, If so advised. in accordance with law, in administratlve exigency and in pubiic interest. Thhe writ petition Is ailowed. No order costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge SS^OK