1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1550/2011 ( Shaikh Mansoor Shaikh Gafar Vs. The State of Maharashtra ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.MK Deshpande,Adv. for Applicant/s; Mr. KM Suryawanshi, APP for State. *** CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 29 th April, 2011. 1) Heard finally. 2) The accused/applicant was found storing 600 liters of kerosene used for domestic purpose (blue kerosene) in a shed. The raid ensued recovery, however, the accused/applicant sneaked. 3) Mr.Deshpande submits, the shed does not belong to the accused/applicant and he is falsely implicated. 4) At this stage of the matter, since based on a discreet information, naming the accused, the shed was raided and accused apparently sneaked/escaped, the ownership or possession of the shed is not imperative, which will be part of investigation. The source of supply/purchase of such massive 600 liters of kerosene by the accused is to be traced, which can only be possible in fetters. 5) Pursuant to earlier direction, the accused/applicant though has attended the police station, however, did not vent the requisite information of his mentor. 6) In the situation, request for pre-arrest bail, being hollow, is rejected. Interim protection vacated. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/