WPMS 1267/2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Sri Mahavir S. Tyagi, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.C. Bisht, the learned Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. The petitioner is the complainant on the basis of which an enquiry was initiated and the licence of respondent no. 3 was suspended, against which respondent no. 3 preferred an appeal, in which an interim order has been granted. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the grant of an interim order, has filed the present writ petition. In the opinion of the Court, the petitioner has no cause to approach this writ court nor the writ petition is maintainable against an interlocutory order. The writ petition is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 24-06-2011 SP