Civil Revision No. 2673 of 2010 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2673 of 2010 Date of decision: 27.4.2010 Avinash Kumari and others ...Petitioner Versus Harjit Singh Sachdev and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. V.K.Sandhir, Advocate for the petitioner S.D.ANAND, J. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner points out that the expression 'revocation' used in the following issue is to be read as 'administration':- “1. Whether letter of revocation dated 29.4.1997 is liable to be set aside on the grounds mentioned in the application? OPA” The petitioner, alongwith proforma respondents, filed a petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act to obtain a succession certificate in respect of the estate of their common ancestor late Shri Kishan Chand son of Dewan Chand. In the course of the resistance, the contesting respondents had set up a will dated 31.7.1994 purporting to have been executed by Kishan Chand whereby the entire estate left by him had been converted into a Trust and contesting respondents had been made trustees thereof. The Civil Revision No. 2673 of 2010 -2- **** plaintiffs-petitioners filed an application for framing of an additional issue about the validity of the will set up by the contesting respondents. That plea of theirs came be negatived by the learned Trial Court wherein observed that the controversy would be covered under Issue No.1. It is apparent, from the pleadings of the parties, that the plaintiffs-petitioners shall have to prove the invalidity of the will in order to succeed under Issue no.1 as already framed; whereas the respondents shall have to prove the converse in order to defeat the plaintiffs-petitioners. In that view of things, it is apparent that the controversy about the validity (or otherwise) of the impugned will shall be adjudicated under issue no.1. In the light of foregoing discussion, the petition is held to be denuded of merit and is ordered to be dismissed. April 27, 2010 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge