IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27356 of 2009 KAMLESH RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 10.09.2009 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a Police case under Section 395 of the Penal Code. The submission is that the FIR is against four unknown. He is in custody on mere suspicion since 14.9.2008, not recognised in the T.I. Parade. The impugned order of rejection states that non- identification in the T.I. Parade was irrelevant. They were not entitled to bail merely because they were put on T.I. Parade. The nature of the order disturbs the Court. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in Narkatiaganj PS Case No. 39 of 2008. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Presiding Officer who has passed the impugned order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)