IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2456 of 2009 ***** 1. M/S Baba Bhutnath Briquette Industries, a proprietorship firm having its office at Krishna Brahm, Chaukiya, Buxar, through its proprietor Mithlesh Kumar Upadhayaya, son of Sri Surya Nath Upadhayaya, resident of Krishna Brahm, Chaukiya, District-Buxar. 2. Ms. R.R.Briquette Industries, a partnership firm having its factory at Soba Road, Krishna Brahm, P.O. Soba, District Buxar through one of its partner Ramesh Kumar Singh, son of Satrughan Singh, resident of At & P.O. Gharauli, District-Buxar. 3. Ms/ Devi Briquette Industries, a proprietorship firm having its factory at Soba, Krishna Brahm, Buxr, through its proprietor Binod Kumar Singh, son of Loknath Singh, resident of At & P.O. Soba, Krishna Brahm, District-Buxar. 4. M/s Vikash Gul Udyog, a proprietorship firm having its factory at Krishna Brahm Road, Kathar, Buxar, through its proprietor Harendra Prasad Singh, son of Ram Lakhan Lal, resident of Krishna Brahm Road, Kathar, District-Buxar. 5. M/s Mico Battery, a proprietorship firm having its factory at Line Hotel, Charitravan, Buxar through its proprietor Ganpati Patak, son of Rudra Narayan Patak, resident of Line Hotel, Charitravan, District-Buxar. …. …. Petitioners Versus 1. The Bharat Cooking Coal Limited, a subsidiary company of Coal India Ltd., Koyala Bhawan, Dhanbad through its Chairman cum Managing Director. 2. The Coal India Ltd., Coal Bhawan, 10 Neetaji Subhash Road, Kolkata through its Chairman. 3. The General Manager (Sales and Marketing), Bharat Cooking Coal Limited, Koyala Bhawan, Dhanbad. 4. Deputy Chief Sales Manager (Legal), Bharat Cooking Coal Limited, 6 Lyons Range, 5th Floor, Kolkata. 5. Deputy Chief Sales Manager (Road Sale), Bharat Cooking Coal Limited, Koyala Bhawan, Dhanbad. …. …. Respondents ----------- 2. 24.2.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for B.C.C.L. Petitioners of the present writ application want a direction upon the respondent B.C.C.L. to resume supply of coal which has been stopped by the respondent without stating the reasons of the same. Without going into the merits of the claim of these petitioners and keeping in view that similar matters have been disposed of with a direction upon the respondents to reconsider the claim of the - 2 - petitioners on resubmission of the documents along with copy of the Court’s order the respondents would be obliged to reconsider the matter and pass appropriate order within a period of eight weeks. Claim of these petitioners is similar to the claim of M/s Amber Fuel Industries, which was C.W.J.C. No. 9163 of 2008, even this writ application is disposed of with a direction upon the respondents that if the petitioners file the necessary documents, the respondents may dispose of the matter within eight weeks from the date of such filing. This writ application is disposed of with above direction. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)