IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No.1 of 1991 ** For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? 1 to 5 : No -------------------------------------------------------------- MOHMED MEGHJI BARKATALI SAIYED Versus AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR KS ACHARYA for Petitioner MR AMIT J SHAH for Respondent No.1 (not present) -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. Date of decision: 01/12/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT : Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since regularly selected candidate has been appointed on the post against which he was working temporarily on stop gap arrangement, this petition does not survive and has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed having become infructuous. Rule is discharged. No order as to cost. -oOo- karim*