1 wp 4381.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4381 OF 2011 Sakhubai Vishambar Dhaghe .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri G. G. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri V. G. Shelke, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State. Shri Sanjay B. Bhosale, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 23RD JUNE, 2011. PER COURT : . The present petitioner had filed a reference. The same was not been transmitted by the Collector and the Collector had rejected the said reference on the ground that the court fees has not been deposited. The present petitioner filed revision before this Court bearing Civil Revision Application No. 84/2004. This Court vide order dated 27.08.2010 allowed the said revision and directed the petitioner to deposit the court fees within three months and if the court fees is deposited within three months, the District Judge was directed to register the said reference. 2 wp 4381.11 The petitioner failed to deposit the said amount within stipulated period as directed by this Court. The District Judge, as such dismissed the said reference. The said order is assailed in the present petition. 2. In fact, when this Court in Civil Revision Application No. 84/2004 had passed the specific order directing the petitioner to deposit the court fees within three months, the District Judge had no other option but to reject the said reference. The petitioner at the most can seek extension of time in the said Civil Revision Application No. 84/2004 or review of the said order passed in Civil Revision Application No. 84/2004 for extension of time. Passing any orders in the present writ petition would amount to review of the order passed in Civil Revision Application No. 84/2004. 3. In the result the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate steps in disposed Civil Revision Application No. 84/2004. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/June 11