HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. v ‘S.A. No.451 of 2003 Sethram, S/o Late Manaram Lodhi, aged about 60 years, R/o Village Bhcrampur, The‘Khairagarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) (Plaintiff) Appellant Versus Haimin Bai, W/o Jeevrakhan’ age 55 years, R/e Village Bhorampur, The-Khairagarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) Respondents Defendants (Defendant No.1) Phoolkuwar, aged 2 years, R/o Village Badgada (Kesala), Teh‘Khairagarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) . (Defendant No.2) Nain Bal, W/c: Deendayal Lodhl, age 49 years, R/o Bhilai Camp No.1, Road No.18: near Teendarshan Mandir, bhilal, Dist‘t. DUrg (CG) (Defendant No.3) Janak Bali W/o Kanglu, aged 46 years, Rlo Yosadha Nagar, Gareeb Nawaz Nagar Board No.4, PO. Durgawati Chowk, Distt. Nagpur (MH) (Defendant No.4) Second civil appeal under Section 100 of CPO Present: Shri HS, Ahluwalia, counsel fOrthe appellant. Shri RS. Baghel, counsel for respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 24.1 1 .2008) Heard on admission. (2) This is a second appeal by the unsuccessful plaintiff. In civil suit No.152-A/1997 dated 22122000, civil Judge,Class-l, Khairagarh dismissed the suit for declaration of titie over the suit land. The lower Appellate Cour’t has, in civil appeal No.8—A/2001, affirmed the findings recorded by the trial Court: (3) Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to make out any case for admission. l am of the considered opinion that no substantial (End? F’ 2 5 question of Iaw arsies for determination of this appeaf, which is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission (4) in view of the above, stay ordered on 23.07.2004 stands vacated. MCP. No.521’2004, which is an application under Order 41 Ruie 5 of CPC for grant of stay and MOP. No.1482/2004 for vacating the stay stand disposed of. r/dri- s h " Diiip Raosaheb Deshmuk ' " ~ Judg .r' _ Priya e