1 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5099 OF 2003 1.The Managing Director Maharashtra State Farming Corportion & another. ...Petitioners vs. 1.Bhanudas Ananta Khendad & ors. ...Respondents --- Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, for Petitioners. Smt.Sangita Deo i/b. Mr.Nitin A.Kulkarni, for Respondent nos.1 to 4, 6,7,9 to 11, 13,14,16,17, 20 to 28. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 25th June, 2010 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for both the sides. The order impugned in the petition is an order of interlocutory nature, validity of which is capable of being challenged 2 with the final order that may be passed in the proceeding. Therefore, the petition challenging such an interlocutory order cannot be entertained. The petition is, therefore, rejected. However, all the contentions available to both the sides are kept open. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) ...