[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2037 OF 2008 Mukesh Omprakash Patharwal ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.M.B.Zanwar Advocate for Applicant Ms.S.S.Shinde APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 8, 2008 DATE : JULY 8, 2008 DATE : JULY 8, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in CR No. 571 of 2006 of Kothrud Police Station, Pune. The said case is mainly under Section 302 of IPC. 3. The FIR is registered against an unknown person. The knife which was recovered at the instance of the applicant did not have any blood stains. So also, the clothes which were seized, did not have any blood stains. It is the prosecution case that the applicant assaulted deceased with knife. However, the post mortem [-2-] notes show that death was caused due to blunt injury on head and neck. 4. The learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the injuries are not consistent with the prosecution case. This shows that the applicant has been falsely implicated. After looking through the record, I find much substance in this submission. Hence, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 5. The applicant-Mukesh Omprakash Patharwal to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rs.thirty thousand only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant to report to Kothrud police station, Pune once in a week till the conclusion of the trial. 6. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]