IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3666 of 2008 Ram Bashist Sharma , Son of Late Dharmdeo Singh, resident of Village & P.O.-Arap, P.S. Bikram, District-Patna, at present residing Awadhpuri Colony, Digha Ghat, P.O. Digha Ghat, P.S. Digha, District/Town-Patna ----------------Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department, Sinchai Bhawan,Patna 2. Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department, Government of Bihar, Sinchai Bhawan, Patna 3. Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Jehanabad 4. Accountant General ,Bihar, Birchand Patel Marg,Patna ----------------------- Respondents. ---------------------------------- 03 12-09-2011 Heard Sri Mukesh Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner , learned counsel for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent no.4/ Accountant General, Bihar. The present writ petition was filed in the year 2008 with a prayer to direct the Respondents to pay all his retiral dues. In this case, a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of Respondent no.3/ Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Jehanabad only on 8th September,2011, wherein it has been stated that all the retiral dues have already been paid to the petitioner. Only T.A. bills have not been paid, which has been admitted in paragraph-15 of the said counter affidavit. Learned counsel for the petitioner also admits that all other dues have been paid save and except two bills relating to Travelling Allowance. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that some amount under the head of Group Insurance has also not been paid. 2 In view of the fact that almost all the retiral dues have already been paid to the petitioner, there is no need to keep the matter further pending. The writ petition stands disposed of. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a fresh representation so far as remaining grievances are concerned before Respondent no.3/ Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Jehanabad within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, the Respondent no.3 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If the Respondent no.3 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within the aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, the Respondent no.3 is required to pass speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within three months from the date of filing of such representation. With the above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)