THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.9564 OF 2010 Dated 4th June, 2010 Between: S.Srinivas …Petitioner And The Station House Officer and two others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : None appeared Counsel for the respondents: G.P for Home The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to direct respondent No.1 to register the First Information Report and respondent No.2 to take up investigation on the petitioner’s report dated 17.04.2010. Both on 30.04.2010 and also today, there has been no representation for the petitioner. I have heard learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents and perused the record. In his affidavit, the petitioner has pleaded that he was assaulted by the members of Union No.327 by name Ganesh and six others at 12.30 p.m on 16.04.2010 at Gandhi Hospital premises and that he gave a report on 17.04.2010 before respondent No.1. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the said report, no case has been registered. At the hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that on the report submitted by the petitioner, respondent No.1 registered petty case in Crime No.1014 of 2010 under Section 70 (b) of the City Police Act and Section 323 IPC on 20.04.2010 and that investigation is pending. In view of this submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and the writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP No.12334 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 4th June, 2010 vrn