IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4780 of 2009 SAJJAD ALI Versus INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF INDIA LTD. & OTHERS ----------- 2. 22.05.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. In view of the limited prayer made on behalf of the petitioner there is no need to issue notice to the respondents at this stage. By an order dated 20.12.2008 passed by the disciplinary authority of the respondent Bank a major punishment of removal was passed against the petitioner. He has preferred a statutory appeal under Rule 17 of the Industrial Development Bank of India Limited Officers Conduct Rules 2006 on 18.11.2008. The petitioner is aggrieved by pendency of the same and desires appropriate direction for expeditious disposal of the same. The writ application is disposed with directions to the respondents to dispose of the appeal of the petitioner within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order, by a reasoned and speaking order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)