HIGHCOURT WCtfrykTnSOARHAT BILA®PUR W.P.(SyNo.1411o<!2007 Pelifioner : GGivmdPiasadVatshnav.S/oShri Raghuvar Das Vaishnw, ag/eitaboirt 43 yeare, R/6 Near Badi Baar, Ratanpur, Bltospur(e.G.) Versus Respondente :1. Throi^hSecretary, EducaBon Defartment, D.K.S. Btawan, Raipw (G.G.). 2. DiredDrofPublteln^RKtion, Psnskwi Bada, Ridpur (G.G.) Singte Bench: HonTala Mr. JusUce Saflsh K. AgnUiotrl. Mr. Kumaresh Tiwari, ^lvocateforttte PrtUoner. Mrs. Anju Miuja, Dy. Govt Adwcate fcrflw resporKtonts/Stato. ORDEX (Passed on this 12th day of Marob, 2007} ThepsfiUoner is wiridng re Asslslart Teacher tn the govemmentsetaool. In the courae <rf his seivtees as Aasidairt Teacher, tlw peSfiener has obtained B.Ed. ExaminaBon CertificriB on his own ®qsensesin ttie monft ofOct-Nov^6(P^. Leamed counsel appearing for tt»pstiUmer submtts that the questton invohwd, heretn asto whattter the teachsr, who obtainecl 8.Ed. Examinsrtion Cerflncsrte on Ws onm expenses, is enBUed to tiie adva»s increments. Accordi^ ts teamed Gounsel for tt»pelMona, the prtitteRer isenfiUed to two advance incrsments in view of ttie decisiwi <rf tttis Court in the case <rf Yashwant Kumar Kiaradwaj Vs. Munic^al CoiporaUon, Durg aml anolher ff!005 Qf) ^4PJR-CG 9?}. This Court In the case ofYashwaat Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal CorporaBon, Durg and anrther (Supra). cametolheconclustonthsAlheteachCTS.whohadoblainedB.Ed./B.T.I. Examlnation Certificate on Viwm own aqpemes, EB® covwed by ttw a>? IS88 t&'^ S3f B/- ^T- cireular dated 24.12.98 (Anneaaire P/7) issued by tt»Stato Owwmment ofMadhyaPradesh. Leamed counsel for the petStoner further submite tftat ttie facts and quesUon of lav involvsd hi the present case a«ea|t»nriycowrfld ty <teGision of this Coiat in the cas»of Yashwant KvnBf Bhsaifcw^ Vs. Municipal CarporaBon, Duig and anoflter (Supra), to vMeh leaned counsel appearing fw ttie respondente lairly Goncedes and agrees with the avennent made by leamed counsel awwring for the p^tonw. Accordlngty, ths writ petition isallowed in terms rfttw ordiBr pa»edinttte case ofYashwant Kumar KiarathnRU Vs. Nnntelfal Corporaton, Dtirg and anottier (Supra), subject to veriRcaUon oftte fact as to whether the petiUoner has acquired B. Ed. Examlnatkm Certiflcate on his OWB expenses as per fce ciroulais d^d a4.12.1898 & 1.3.19OT andftirther wrtieBier he has been paid two advance increments er nrt. No ORter as coste. — - - Sd/- SatishKAgnihotri Judge