(1) ca3489-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3489 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1178 OF 2011 Dr. Subhash s/o Trimbak Patil & another APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS .... Mr. P.R. Patil, advocate for the applicants. Mr. S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for the respondent/State. .... CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 19th APRIL, 2011 ORAL ORDER : 1. This matter is placed on Board today at the instance of learned A.G.P. He invited our attention to the last paragraph of the order dated 1st April, 2011 and submitted that by this order, the petitioners are allowed to make representation to respondent No. 4 and further directions are issued to respondent No. 4 to consider their representation after giving an opportunity of being heard to respondent No. 5. Learned A.G.P. submits that (2) ca3489-11 instead of "respondent No. 4", the directions be issued to respondent No. 3 i.e. the Divisional Joint Registrar. Learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection for issuing such direction to respondent No. 3. Hence, in the last paragraph of the order dated 1st April, 2011, "respondent No. 4" be read as "respondent No. 3". Similarly, the reference to "District Deputy Registrar" in the order may also be read as "Divisional Joint Registrar". The order dated 1st April, 2011 is modified only to that extent. The office is directed to issue copy of the modified order to the parties. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] NPJ/ca3489-11