IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5185 OF 2008 Shri.Harish Arjun Bhagde ...Petitioner Versus Sou.Nasrin Ekbal Memon ...Respondent ...... Mr.Sanjeev S.Rairkar i/b Mr.N.C.Walimbe for Petitioner. None for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JULY 18, 2008. JULY 18, 2008. JULY 18, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. The opinion expressed by the Court below in Paragraph 17 is the correct position in law. In the Suit filed by the landlord against the tenant for recovery of possession, the tenant cannot pray for relief of injunction against the landlord. Even if the tenant has good cause to ask for injunction against the landlord, that issue is : 2 : completely outside the proceedings instituted by the landlord, to be tried and decided by the Rent Court. Hence, no interference is warranted in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Dismissed. 3. At the same time, it is clarified that if the Petitioner takes recourse to appropriate remedy before competent forum, all questions will have to be addressed on its own merits in accordance with law. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.