:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITIOIN NO. 1324 OF 2004 WRIT PETITIOIN NO. 1324 OF 2004 WRIT PETITIOIN NO. 1324 OF 2004 -------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders -------------------------------------------------------- C Ms. Gauri Godse for the petitioners. Mr. Dhananjay Pawar for Mr Rajeev Matkar for respondents 1 to 5. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 14.11.2005 . By orders dated 30th January, 2004 and 20th February, 2004 in the present writ petition, this Court has directed the parties to maintain status quo. The order of status quo has been continued since then. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner has already filed an :2: affidavit of evidence. The main suit itself is ready for final disposal. Considering the rival contentions raised by the parties, when the basic suit itself is for declaration and injunction of the property in question, the parties need to maintain status quo till the decision of the suit. 3. Taking into account the above, the present writ petition is disposed of accordingly with direction that the parties to maintain status quo as directed by the orders dated 30th January, 2004 and 24th February, 2004. Petition is disposed of accordingly. (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]