IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.938 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: 02.03.2010 Kiranjeet Kaur and another Appellants Versus Gura Singh Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH Present: Mr.Rajinder Kumar Singla, Advocate for the appellants ….. Jasbir Singh, J.(Oral) C.M. No.2675-C of 2010 In view of reasons mentioned in this application, which is accompanied by an affidavit of the counsel, it is allowed and delay of 255 days in re-filing the appeal stands condoned. C.M. No.2676 -C of 2010 This is an application for condonation of 5 days in filing the appeal. Application is accompanied by an affidavit, wherein it has been stated that delay in filing the appeal is not intentional. Accordingly, this application is allowed and delay stands condoned. Regular Second Appeal No.938 of 2010 Respondent-Gura Singh filed a suit for permanent injunction with a prayer that the appellants-defendants be restrained from illegally and Regular Second Appeal No.938 of 2010(O&M) forcibly interfering in the land, description of which was given in the plaint. His suit was decreed. Appellants failed in appeal. Hence, this Regular Second Appeal. Both the Courts below, by placing reliance upon evidence led by both the parties, came to a conclusion that the basic dispute is regarding ownership of some trees. It was found, as a matter of fact, that those trees were standing in the land owned by the respondent-plaintiff. It has also come on record that location of the trees was not even disputed by witnesses produced by the appellants-defendants. No law point has been made out to interfere in concurrent finding of fact given by both the Courts below. Dismissed. 02.03.2010 (Jasbir Singh) gk Judge 2