IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST AUGUST 2011 / 9TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23586 of 2011(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. JINCY SARA YACOB, C/O.BAIJU CHARLY, PULIKATHARA HOUSE, RAYONPURAM P.O., KANJIRAKKAD-683542, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. SUDEEP PRATHAP KINI, 'SANJEEVI', 39/4750, T.MADHAVAN NAIR ROAD, RAVIPURAM, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682016. BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. SRI.T.G.SUNIL (PRANAVAM) SRI.K.R.GANESH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM. SC SRI.T.A.SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 23586 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION ALONG WITH CHALAN RECEIPT FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION ALONG WITH CHALAN RECEIPT FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS (True copy) P.A.To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).23586/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 31st day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of 6th semester B.Tech (Information Technology) Engineering Examination vide Exts.P1 and P2 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs