Crl.M.No.M-12238 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-12238 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 28, 2010 Satpal Kaur and another .....Petitioners v. State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Parties in person with Mr.H.S.Batth, Advocate. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondent nos.2 to 4 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent nos.5 to 8. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police, Tarn Taran, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 26.4.2010, Annexure P4, already made to him by the petitioners. As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners are major. Age of petitioner no.1-Satpal Kaur, as per copy of Identity Card issued by Election Commission of India, Annexure P1, is 18 years as on 1.1.2006 and date of birth of petitioner No.2- Baljit Singh, as per copy of Matriculation Examination Certificate, Annexure P2, is 1.5.1986. They got married on 15.4.2010, as per averments made in the petition. Photographs of the marriage are Annexure P3. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, i.e.,Senior Superintendent of Police, Tarn Taran, to take appropriate action, Crl.M.No.M-12238 of 2010 (O&M) -2- in accordance with law, on application, dated 26.4.2010, Annexure P4, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioners. 28.4.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge