IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI WRIT APPEAL (SR) NO.15071 OF 2010 Dt.23.2.2010 Between: The Siddipet Fishermen’s Cooperative Society Siddipet, Medak District, Regd. No.213 Rep. by its President Kamuni Narasaiah S/o. K. Narasaiah R/o.3-2-4, Boigalli, Siddipet, Medak District … Appellant And The Fishermen Cooperative Society Metapalli (proposed Society) Mittapalli Village, Siddipet Mandal Medak District, rep. by its Promoter S. Yadagiri, S/o. Mallaiah, R/o. Mittapalli Village Siddipet Mandal, Medak District and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI WRIT APPEAL (SR) NO.15071 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Nisar Ahmad Kakru) Fishermen Cooperative Society, Mittapalli, Mittapalli Village, Siddipet Mandal, Medak District, having failed to receive consideration for registration, invoked the jurisdiction of the Writ Court which came to be disposed of by judgment dt.22.10.2009, the operative portion whereof reads: “…In the light of the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the considered opinion that the writ petition can be disposed of directing respondent No.2 to consider the case of the petitioner for registration of the petitioner Society in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of with the above direction. There shall be no order as to costs.” It is this direction, which is sought to be impugned, therefore, leave to appeal accorded. A perusal of the direction, in our opinion, in no manner whatsoever violates any of the rights of the appellant. What is to the credit of the writ petitioner, respondent No.1 herein, is a direction for consideration in accordance with law. In that view of the matter, indulgence is declined. Needless to say that in case the appellant has any objection to register against the registration sought by the writ petitioner, nothing prevents him to raise it. Disposed of accordingly. T. MEENA KUMARI, J NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ 23-2-2010 bnr