IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 13TH JANUARY 2011 / 23RD POUSHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 344 of 2011 ------------------------------------ [S.C. NO.965/2009 OF THE IST ADDITIONAL ASST. SESSIONS COURT, THRISSUR, CRIME NO.220/2002 OF THE CHAVAKKAD POLICE STATION] PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ---------------------------------- SHAMSUDEEN, S/O. SULIMAN, THAZATH VEETTIL HOUSE, THIRUVATHRA DESOM, MANATHALA VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT. RESPONDENT/STATE: -------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/01/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No.344 of 2011 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 13.01.2011 ORDER Petitioner, who is the sole accused in S.C.No.965/2009 on the file of Additional Asst.Sessions Court, Thrissur, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.Admittedly non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Court below and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the court below and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably, on the same date on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner. This Bail Application is, accordingly, disposed of. Dated this the 13th day of January, 2011 V. RAMKUMAR,(JUDGE) sj