: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1049 OF 2005 Dayanand Rajdeo Vishwakarma .. Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & ors. .. Respondents Mr.K.R.Tiwari i/b M/s.K.R.Tiwari & Co., Advocate for Petitioner. Mr.S.R.Shinde, APP for Respondent No.1. Mr.A.K.Prajapati, Advocate for Respondent No.2 to 4. CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & P.V.KAKADE, JJ. DATE : 20TH APRIL, 2005. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the parties and the learned APP. Perused the record. 2. Considering the fact that the parties have amicably settled the matter between themselves and no dispute survives between the parties and those facts : 2 : having been confirmed by the learned advocate for the parties, the petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The petition accordingly stands disposed of with no order as to costs. (R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.) (P.V.Kakade,J.)