CRMA No. 1333 of 2009 CRMA No. 616/2010 In C482 No. 618 of 2009 Hon’ble Prafulla C.Pant,J. Shri Piyush Garg, Advocate , present for the petitioners. Shri G.S. Sandhu, G.A, with Shri M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present for the State. Shri M.S.Pal, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri D.N. Sharma, Advocate, present for respondent no. 2/complainant. Heard. This is Compounding Application No. 616 of 2010 moved on behalf of the respondent no.2/complainant stating that the parties to the matrimony have entered into compromise, as such the complainant is not interested to prosecute the petitioners. It is pleaded in the application that the impugned criminal proceedings may be quashed. The application is supported not only by the affidavit of complainant Tarsem Chand but also with the affidavit of Smt. Ruby wife of petitioner no. 1 Manjeet Agarwal. In view of principle of law laid down in B.S. Joshi vs. State of Hariyana (2003) 4SCC page 675, the petition deserves to be allowed. Accordingly the petition under section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is allowed. Proceedings of Criminal Case No. 373 of 2009 State vs. Manjeet Agarwal and others, relating to offences punishable under section 498A, 504, 506 I.P.C., and one punishable under section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur, are hereby quashed. (Prafulla C.Pant,J. ) 24.06.2010 NP