^Z^...... f ^^^. ^•^-^.--" e ^ ^ ^•^"A^.-' ..;-^r^'^-"" ^•••••''::<^\"^\1^:""' ^^^v!?k^k" •^^ IN THE COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0Mi OF 2010 PETSTIONER 2. 3. 4. 5. Sahjad Khan, S/o Amjad Khan, aged about 32 yeara, R/o village Jaijaipur, District Janjgir-Chainpa (CG). Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Social Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). Collector, Korba (CG). Janpad Panchayat, Kartala, Korba (CG), through its Chief Executive Officer. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Kartala, Korba (CG). Block Education Officer, Kartala, Korba (CG). PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SNDIA ^ 9^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 1566 OF 2010 Sahjid Khan Versus State of Chhattisgarh &0thers (Writ petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri S.R.J. Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 9th day ofApril, 2010) 1. By this petition, the petitioners seek a direction to the respondent authorities to allow the petitioners to work on the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade - III without any interruption. 2. It is not the case of the petitioners that they have been removed from the service after their joining on 15-7-2009. However, according to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners have been prevented from signing the attendance register. No other facts have been narrated asto why they have been restrained from signing the attendance register. The facts available on record are not sufficient for adjudication ofthe dispute involved herein, as there is no order of removal or any other document by which the petitioners have been restrained from signing the attendance register. 3. In the result, the writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed at the motion stage itself. Sd/- Gowri SatishK.Agnihom Judge