C t c' ^\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. N0. R<<(^ /04 PETITIONER ^' ^.^^ ^•'^^"" •^ '^ ^°\^ c^" ... ^ ^v-r- <-^ . - • ^^~ ^:- RESPONDENT .-,,^° NAWAB MEHANDI ASAR USMANI A aged 35 Yrs. Son of Late Sheikh Nawab Usmani, Resident of HIG-9 Sector II, Shanker Nagar, Raipur City Tahsil and District Raipur Chhattisgarh VERSUS 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Through Secretary Vanijya Vibhag (Excise) D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralay, Raipur (C.G.) 2. COMMISSIONER EXCISE State of Chhattisgarh having its office at Byron Bazar, Raipur (C.G.) 3. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER Excise State of Chhattisgarh having its office at Byron Bazar, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT, WRITS, ORDER DIRECTION ETC. -—£ £^£BSSS:^ XI-HC-22 -S^ -^TPTT^?. ^T^^4^> '?^Tr^? W^TT ^HIch 3??^ ^^ \^^-(^^ ^^"^i' 2<W 64 f^^y' '3Tf^ ^bi w^ ^s^ 9h^ich <-i[^a w t- 3JI^T ^"RTi^R ^rft?? 21-12-2005 Petitioner by Shri y l\A4^ax p<ji\ Shri P.S. Koshy, Dy. Adv. General) Heard. This case relates to compassiona^e employee sen/ing in the State. Leamed counset for the petitionerl the employee has occurred on or after 1 -' in batch ofcases bearingW.P. No. 1322/2p02 passed by this Court on 20/12/2005. He rfr atso. Learned counsel for the State doe^ of Chhattisgarh has taken a decision employees who died on or after 1/11/199^ that time. In view of the submissions mad< without expressing any opinion on the mef Justice witl be sen/ed if a direction is concemed to eonsider and decide the c^se prevalent at the time of death of the ^ppointment orders will be issued as petitioner is also directed to render due cc<- any gnevance stitl remains, the petition^r inciuding fiting of the petition before this Cjourt. With the aforesaid obsen/ations, Certified copy as per rules. Copy to the State counsel, who respondents for comptiance. / ~chl^d^1r1 ^T1^ "^ f^TZt TN^T{ '^''STf^n? ^T^T i^^t, Advocate. t1'or tHe State. 3na^e appointment consequent upon the death of an [categorically stated that in this case, the death of 11-1997 and not earlier. It is further submitted that involving the same question ordershave been }rays that similar orders may be passed in this case not dispute the above fact and state that the State to consider the cases of dependants of those strictty in accordance with the policy prevalent at Ipby leamed counset appearing for the parties, ["its of the case, in the opinion of this Court, ends of to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities of the petitioner in accordance with the policy em[()loyee concemed. If the petitioner found etigibte, as possible on or before 30th April, 2006. The -operation to the authorities. It is made clear that if t^r may avail the remedy availabte under the law c^se earyy tt^is petltion stands disposed of. will be obliged to communicate the order to the A__„-.— Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge .'< " w^ ...^^ ^fe^ ^^..:. 'i^: SSg