IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.366 OF 2006 Chandrakant Bhima Bharate & Ors. ....Appellants V/s. Narhari Balu Bharate ....Respondent Mr.R.V. Bansode for the Appellants. Mr.Sachin Dhakepalkar with Mr.Ajay Patil i/b Mr.P.K. Dhakepalkar for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 21ST AUGUST, 2007. P.C. : 1. The matter does not raise any questions of law. Both the Courts have come to the conclusion that the original Plaintiff was the owner of the land. Both the Courts have also come to the conclusion that the Defendants have failed to prove on what basis their name was included in the cultivation column. Both the Courts have also held that the Defendants/Appellants had not led any evidence to establish their possession and have also not furnished any explanation on the basis whereof the revenue entries were made. 2. In the circumstances, the Second Appeal is dismissed.