C.R. No.1894 of 2008 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.1894 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.10.2010 Suman Lal ……Petitioner VERSUS Mahipal Singh ……Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondent. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. Heard. 2. Landlord has invoked revision jurisdiction of this Court un- der Section 15(6) of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Evic- tion) Act challenging the order dated 27.11.2007 passed by the Ap- pellate Authority, Bhiwani. 3. In the impugned judgment, learned Appellate Authority has held that rate of rent was Rs.600/- p.m. whereas the tenant had C.R. No.1894 of 2008 (O&M) -2- deposited the rent @ Rs.1000/- p.m. Learned Appellate Authority has also directed that excess amount paid by the tenant can be re- covered from the landlord. Feeling aggrieved from this part of im- pugned judgment, landlord has approached this Court. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner-landlord fairly stated that excess amount paid by the tenant shall be adjusted towards the future rent and in that eventuality refund is not proper. 5. I agree with the argument advanced by learned Counsel for the petitioner-landlord. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, I direct that excess rent already paid by the tenant shall be adjusted towards the future rent. 6. With this observation, present petition stands disposed of. ( ALOK SINGH ) 26h October, 2010 JUDGE ashish