: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4901 OF 2007 Hanuman V. Kale ....Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.S.S. Salunke for the Petitioner. Mr.R.D. Rane, GP for the Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 29TH JUNE, 2007. P.C. : 1. The Petitioner approached this Court contending that the interviews for the posts of Arogya Sevak were held in the year 2001 and the results have not been declared. It is further contended that the Respondents have now once again readvertised the posts. 2. After nearly six years, it is not possible to direct the Respondents to declare the results and also to stay the new selection, merely because some of the persons who appeared for interview and who were selected have been appointed. Once the Government has taken the decision to readvertise, that would mean that they have scrapped the earlier list. This can be : 2 : done because of passage of time, it cannot be said that the action taken by the Respondent is arbitrary. Hence no interference is called for. The Petition is rejected. (R.M. SAVANT, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)