( ^ ^0~© 6 Before Hon'ble Hiah Court of Chhattisaarh At Bilaspur W. P.(S). N0. 6U 12009 PETLTJONERS /' ,<^- 2. A. ^y .^•S/J. ^ .<^^ 1 \^\ \ ^ ^\ ^- -%^-.^ '<^^^ ..^ '^^ ^RMA •^"" f. 1. DeepKumarSahu Ageabout40year, S/o Shri UdayKumar Sahu Village + Post- Bhainsmundi Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) DanikYadav Age about 33 year, S/o Late Shri Devnath Yadav Village+Post-Kundel Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) YashwantSingh Dhruw Age about 35 year, S/o Shri Prem Lal Dhruw R/o-AdarshWardNo.18 Sheetala Para, Navapara Rajim Distt.-RaipurC.G.) ^' 4. Birendra Kumar Sahu Age about 37 year, S/o Shri Dwijram Sahu Govt. PrimarySchool Bhothidiah Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) 5. ShantoshKumarSharma Ageabout 40 year, H.M. S/o Shri Satrughan Lal Govt. primary School Jaharidiah Distt.-RaipurC.G.) Contd..2.. 6. TulaRamSinha 1 %^^s/^^ ,^- -:^^x J\'^^ Age about 38 year, Astt. Teacher S/o ShriNharSinghSinha Govt. PrimarySchool Rengadiah Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) 7. TejendraKumarYadu Ageabout 36year, Astt.Teacher S/o Shri Kishan Lal Govt. Primary School Chandana Distt.-RaipurC.G.) VERSUS 1. StateGovt-ofChhattisgarh Through Secretary Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Distt.-Raipur(C.G.) Distt. Education Officer Dhamtari, Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) Distt. Education Officer Raipur, Distt.- Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS HjGHCOURTOFCHHATT{SGARH:BI^^ WR|TPETmQN1SINOA40F_2009 PETITSONERS Deep Kumar Sahu RESPQNDENTS Versus State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitutton of tndia) SJngie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:". Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the petjtioners, Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on thls 12th day of January, 2010) 1. . •Wlth the consent of leamed counseS for ttie partl.es, the petltlon ts heard finaiiy. 2, ,• At the very outset, iearned counseS appearing for the petitioners submlts that this petjtion Is squarety covered by the declston of this Court passed on 6-2-2009 In W.P. (S) No.367 of 2009 (ilma Ambaat v^ State of ChhaW^garh & Offiere) and prays that slmilar relief may be granted In case ofthe present petjtioners atso, •• 3. At.this juncture, jearned counsel appearmg for the State sybmits that m the event the petltloners submit a detailed the same shatj be considered and declded, in accordance w'rth Saw and in v-iew of the declsion of thls Court rendered in Uma AmbBat (supra), subject to verification of facts. 4. In vlew of foregoing, according to the learned counsei appearing for the petjtioners nothlng sur^ives in this petitlon for adjucjlcation. Accordingiy, the writ petltion Is disposed of, 5. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge