THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5124 of 2009 ORDER: This revision filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, by the defendant is directed against the order, dated 17.08.2009 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Pithapuram, in dismissing I.A.No.557 of 2009 in O.S.No.155 of 2006 filed for sending the suit promissory note along with her admitted signatures to the handwriting expert of Government Forensic, Hyderabad, for comparison. On dismissal of earlier I.A.No.989 of 2008 filed for the very same relief, on 27.01.2009, the petitioner filed Civil Revision Petition No.695 of 2009, which was dismissed by this Court on 02.04.2009 granting liberty to the petitioner to move the lower Court, if any contemporaneous admitted signatures are available for sending Ex.A.1 promissory note for comparison and if any such application is filed, the same can be decided by the Court as per the law laid down by the Supreme Court in THIRUVENGADA PILLAI v. NAVANEETHAMMAL[1]. Taking clue from the above, the petitioner again filed I.A.No.557 of 2009 for comparison of the alleged signatures on the suit promissory note with the admitted signatures on xerox copy of the sale deed executed by her in favour of Mr. B.Suryanarayana on 14.09.2005. The Court below having observed that the certified copy cannot be sent for expert for comparison and there are no contemporaneous admitted signatures in order to compare with the signatures on Ex.A.1 promissory note, dismissed the I.A. through the impugned order. Therefore, I am of the opinion that the Court below rightly passed the impugned order, which does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity warranting interference by this Court. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J 6th NOVEMBER, 2009. kvni [1] AIR 2008 SC 1541