IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH JUNE 2010 / 25TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 29697 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- LIYAKKATH ALI ,S/O. KUNHABDULLA THIYYAKANNOTH HOUSE, KIDANHI PO, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.CIBI THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE VILLAGE OFFICER PERINGATHUR VILLAGE, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SECRETARY, KARIYAD GRAMA PANCHAYATH KARIYAD SOUTH PO, KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THALASSERY. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REP BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE , SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN FOR R2 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. M.A. ASIF. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 29697 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 15th day of June, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges orders passed under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, the last of which is Ext. P8 order. I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition in exercise of my discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India insofar as the petitioner has an effective alternate remedy by way of revision before the Government against Ext. P8 order under Section 28 of the Act. Therefore, without prejudice to that right, this writ petition is dismissed. However, if the petitioner files a revision against Ext. P8 order, the period during which this writ petition was pending before this Court, ie, from 20-10-2009 till today shall be excluded for the purpose of calculating the limitation. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.