IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY VPH CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATON NO. 204 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL No. 279 OF 2008 Deepak J. Girme ... Applicant Arjun Haribhau Ubhe & Ors ... Appellants Vs Kashinath Ahile Ubhe & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Rahul Chitnis & Pankaj Kode i/b Sachin Pawar, for the Applicant. Mr. Y. A. Salunkhe i/b Y.K.S. Legal, for the Respondents. CORAM : A. P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : JANUARY 30, 2009. P.C.: ---- . The learned counsel for the applicant does not press prayer Clause (c), (d) and (e), however, seeks liberty to file a fresh application. Permission is granted, as prayed for. Prayer Clauses (c), (d) and (e) are rejected as of now. 2. So far as prayer Clause (b) is concerned wherein the prayer is made for impleading intervenor as party respondent is not opposed by the learned counsel for the appellant. Thus, application is made absolute in terms of prayer Clause (b). Application is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- - 2 - [ A. P. DESHPANDE, J.]