IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.248 OF 2000 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.248 OF 2000 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.248 OF 2000 Nandu Chandrakant More .. Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr.M.R.Katikar for applicant. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED : 15th April, 2008. DATED : 15th April, 2008. DATED : 15th April, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is challenging the judgement and order dated 9.5.2000 passed in Criminal Appeal No.219 of 1994 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune; whereunder the order of J.M.F.C. in Criminal Appeal No.242 of 1991 dated 16.8.1994 was set aside and modified holding the accused guilty under Sections 143, 147, 148, 148, 149, 324 and 341 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to suffer S.I. for 6 months and to pay fine of Rs.500/- i/d. to suffer S.I. for 1 month under Section 248(ii) of Cr.P.C. The accused has already paid fine. In that view of the matter, the present revision has become infructuous. 3. I was taken through the judgement and order under challenge and the evidence referred therein and having gone through the same, the entire finding referred by the lower Appeallte Court, I find that no case is made out to interfere with the same. Nothing is pointed out during the course of hearing to justify as to hold that the findings recorded by the lower Appellate Court are perverse. In the result, the revision petition fails with no order as to costs. (V.C. DAGA, J.) (V.C. DAGA, J.) (V.C. DAGA, J.)