IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND MAY 2008 / 1ST JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 14212 of 2008(P) ---------------------------------- PETITIONERS: ---------------- GIRIJA,AGED 47,W/O.NARAYANANKUTTY, KANAKAPPILLY HOUSE,ATTAPADAM, GAMA NAGAR P.O, KORATTY,THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU SRI.M.GEORGE THOMAS RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,THRISSUR. 2. THE KORATTY GRAMA PANCHAYAT,REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,KORATTY,THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,MURINGOOR,THEKKUMURY THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR,MUKUNDAPURAM,IRINJALAKUDA. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. K.V. MANOJ KUMAR ADV. SRI. P. VIJAYA BHANU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 14212 OF 2008 - P = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 22nd May, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that she wants to construct a house in a plot acquired by her by virtue of Ext. P1 title deed. According to her, the land is now classified as Nilam and therefore she is not granted permit for commencing construction. In view of this, seeking reclassification of the land into garden land and also permission for construction of her residential house in the land referred to above, she has submitted Ext. P5 before the 1st respondent and orders on Ext. P5 has not been passed so far. It is in these circumstances the writ petition has been filed. 2. In view of the fact that Ext. P5 request made by the petitioner is pending consideration of the 1st respondent, at this stage it is not necessary for this Court to examine the contentions raised in the writ petition on the merits of the controversy. 3. In view of the pendency of Ext. P5, I direct that the 1st respondent shall take up Ext. P5, consider the same and if W.P.(C) No. 14212 OF 2008 - 2 - necessary, conduct an inspection of the land as well. Thereafter final orders on Ext. P5 will be passed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Before final orders are passed the petitioner will be given a notice in the matter. 4. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-