1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.103/2006. (Shivaji s/o Sahebrao Shinde and Ors. Vs. Shivprasad s/o Jagannath Agrawal) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 19 th November, 2010. ... 1) Counsel called, absent. 2) In this CRA Rule was granted on 9th October, 2007. 3) Perused the order below Exhibit-14 in RCS No.385/2006, which has been questioned in this CRA. 4) The learned Judge, on evaluation of the pleadings, found that in the subsequent suit, cause of action is shown to be accrued on 10.7.2006 while the earlier suit was withdrawn in which he has stated the accrual of cause of action to be dated 10.5.2006. Both the suits relate to perpetual injunction. The findings of the learned Judge based on the subsequent cause of action cannot be 2 questioned. 5) The impugned order does not indicate any perversity, not to be interfered. 6) CRA lacks merit, dismissed. Rule discharged. Interim protection dated 7.12.2006 vacated forthwith. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/