IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.14136 of 2011 Date of Decision.05.08.2011 Nitin Sagar son of Sh. Vidhya Sagar Arya, resident of 1889/5, Pech Param Ram, Old Anaj Mandi Rohtak, District Rohtak and others .....Petitioners Versus Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Industries, New Delhi and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Ashwani Bakshi, Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that they have given representation to the notices, which have been issued complaining that the time granted in the impugned notices is very short and it is very difficult to comply with such a demand. The replies, which the petitioners claimed that they have made, shall be considered by respondent No.3 and he will take an appropriate decision in the matter. 2. With this direction, the writ petition is disposed of, dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 05, 2011 Pankaj*