-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 34 OF 2007 Manubhai Paragji Vashi...... ... Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Others.. ..... Respondents. Mr.M. P. Vashi, petitioner present-in-person. Mr.Ravi Kadam, Advocate General, with Mr. V. P. Malvankar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. A. G. Damle for Respondent No.5. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 20TH JUNE, 2007. DATED : 20TH JUNE, 2007. DATED : 20TH JUNE, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: During the course of hearing and while relying upon the affidavit filed on record on behalf of the respondent, it is stated that the Court of the Additional District Judge at Vasai shall start working. It is further stated that as per the report of the District Judge, there is excessive staff in Palghar Court which may be temporarily transferred to that Court and if any further staff is needed the Government will sanction the same without any demur. -: 2 :- 2. In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents, nothing survives in this petition, which is disposed of as such. Sd/- CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.