1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.27 OF 2009 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.24 OF 2008 Mr.Rajiv Ram Labhaya Suri. ..Applicant. v/s. Shri Saleem Shah. ..Respondent. Mr.Satish Mishra i/b. Mr.A.M.Saraogi for applicant. None for Respondent. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED :- NOVEMBER 6, 2009. P.C.: 1. Office note records that copy is served on the other side. Inspite of the said observation, hearing of this Application was deferred on the earlier occasion, i.e. 16th October, 2009. To give one opportunity to the Respondent, the Court called upon the Applicant to give intimation to the Respondent about the next date of hearing. I am informed across the bar that such intimation has already been given. Besides, the appearance of Advocate for the Respondent is already notified on the board. Inspite of 2 that no one appears for the Respondent even today. Accordingly, hearing of this application proceeds exparte against the Respondent. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the Application, being sufficient cause, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) on condition that the Applicant shall remove all office objections within four weeks from today, failing which the Appeal, which is restored in terms of this order shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)