HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI FiAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. & HON'BLE SHRI R.L. JHANWAR, J. Appellants Applicants Respondents Non-applicants Misc. Appeal No. 1204 of 2005 1 Smt. Ahilya Bai, w/o late Mastram Sahu, aged 40, housewife, r/o Mahamaya Para, near Temple, P.S. Purani Basti, Raipur C.G. 2 Ashwani Kumar. 3 Somprakash aged 19 yrs. No. 2and 3 s/o Mastram Sahu and r/o vill. Rankadihi P.S. & Tah. Kurud Distt. Dhamtari C.G, 4 Smt. Durga Sahu w/o Dushyant Sahu 28 yrs. r/o Parsada P.S. & Tah. Abhanpur distt. Raipur. 5 Smt. Radhika Sahu-w/o Ramesh Kumar Sahu age 21 yrs. r/o. Vill. Nari, P.S. & Tah. Kurud Distt. Dhamtari C..G VERSUS 1 Jethanand @ Lalu, s/o Dwarka Das, r/o Telibandha, Gali No.2, P.S. Civil Lines, Raipur. 2 M/s Rajnandgaon Road Lines, by Mananging Director Civil Lines, Raipur. 3 The New India Insurance Co. Ltd. by Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, Kutehery Chowk, Jail road, Raipur C.G. MemoofMisc. Appeal underSection 173 ofthe Motor Vehicles Act Present: None for the appellants. Shri Dashratb Prajapati, counsel for respondent No.1. None for respondent No.2. iiN':in %.. K t%iia^§ :y^J] ^li. ^ge^.^' ^f.l'i-SS ^ Shri P. Dutta, counsel for respondent No.3. w ,'tl' subbu ORDER (4thMay,2011) The following order of the Court was passed by RajeevGupta,C.J. None for the appellants. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Chief Jiistice Sd/- R.L.Jhanwar