IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20009 of 2010 AMIT KUMAR @ LALTU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 11.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is denying himself to be Laltu Yadav. If really the petitioner is not laltu Yadav, then the petition for anticipatory bail is not maintainable. It is for the Court and the authority concerned to connect Laltu Yadav with Amit Kumar. If really the petitioner is Laltu Yadav also then it is further a case of cheating along with other offences. The application for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, dismissed as not maintainable. VPS ( Mandhata Singh,J.)