IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13554 of 2009 UMA KANT JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 18.5.2009 Heard Sri Y.B.Giri, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The police has definite information about the racket being run by a couple of persons on forging documents of passing different examinations. Accordingly, the search was conducted at a single destination and huge number of documents, seals and other articles were recovered. The recoveries contained a volume of certificates to be issued in token of passing particular examinations and some of blank certificates both signatory allegedly by this petitioner and the seal of his institutes. Most of seals were blank. The details are fully given in column four of the seizure memo in respect of the recoveries which were allegedly concerning the petitioner or his institutes. The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that merely it is a case of suspicion, without their being acts or material connected the petitioner. It was - 2 - further contended that the petitioner has some litigation regarding appointment of a Chela of Udasin Panth and those persons as indicated in paragraphs 6, 7 and 8 of his petition conspired with the police and got the prosecution initiated. I have looked some part of the case diary and I find that some of the documents which was initiated from Hindi Vidyapeath, Deoghar under sealed registered cover and which could have been found in possession of the petitioner in his institutes were found lying, considering which, the prayer is dismissed. However, if the petitioner appears with a prayer for regular bail, the court below shall not be prejudiced with the finding recorded by me and hear the matter and decide it according to its own merit. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )