IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6735 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: November 04, 2011 Parnav Kumar .. Petitioner Vs. Puran Chand .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Yogesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 12.10.2011 (Annexure P4) passed by the trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the evidence of the petitioner- defendant had commenced on 21.9.2011 and it was closed by order on 12.10.2011. Learned counsel seeks some more time to conclude his evidence. Under the circumstances, the instant petition is allowed, the impugned order is set aside and the petitioner- defendant is granted two months time to conclude his entire evidence. However, it is made clear that no further time would be extended for the said purpose. This petition is allowed without issuing notice to the respondent with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondent as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondent may move to this court for recalling this order. November 04, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge