IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 19TH OCTOBER 2009 / 27TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 35503 of 2008(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ALICE, W/O.ANTHONIKUTTY, PAYYAPPILLI HOUSE, KUZHIKKATTUSSERY, THAZHEKKAD POST, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJU.S.A RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE ALOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, P.O.KALLETTUMKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SECRETARY, ALOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, P.O.KALLUTTUMKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. BINOY, S/O.VASU, NADEEKKADAN, KUZHIKKATTUSSERY, THAZHEKKAD POST, THRISSUR DIST. 4. BALAN, CHOTHIPARAMBU HOUSE, KUZHIKKATTUSSERY, THAZHEKKAD POST, THRISSUR DIST. R1, R2 BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE R3, R4 BY ADV.SRI.T.N.MANOJ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN WPC.35503/08 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 24.10.2008. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE SKETCH PREPARED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THAZHEKKAD DATED 10.10.2008. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.1729/08 BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKUDA DATED 10.11.2008. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE COMMISSION REPORT DATED 18.11.2008. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 6.11.2008. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN O.S.NO.1729/08 ON THE FILE OF MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKUDA DATED 20.2.2009. /TRUE COPY/ THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.35503 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of October, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges Ext.P5. That is a decision essentially revolving on the question as to the width of a road. As of now, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner states that his client would be satisfied if the official respondents expedite the identification of the boundaries in terms of what is stated in the counter affidavit sworn to on 12.12.2008 by the second respondent, also on behalf of the first respondent. Recording this submission, it is directed that the measurements of the area and the identification of the boundary shall be expedited, if needed, by involvement of the revenue officials and concluded within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. All other issues on merits are left open. This writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.21/10.