IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 18300 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION : 03.10.2011 Indraj and others .... PETITIONERS Versus State of Haryana and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present: Mr. Mahendra Singh Tewatia, Advocate, for the petitioners. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) The petitioners, who are residents of village Malooka, Tehsil Hathin, District Palwal, and belong to economically weaker section, have filed this petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuing direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Palwal (respondent No.2) to consider and decide their representation dated 29.7.2011, copy of which has been annexed as Annexure P-5, whereby they have made a grouse of the illegal allotment of 100 square yards plots to the weaker section under the policy of the State Government, while ignoring their (petitioners) claim, who are eligible and entitled for allotment of the said plots. It is the case of the petitioners that Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat of their village intentionally has not properly appreciated and CWP No. 18300 of 2011 -2- considered their prayer for allotment of 100 square yards plots under the aforesaid policy and allotments of such plots in the village have been made to the ineligible persons. It is alleged that in this regard, a detailed representation dated 29.7.2011 (Annexure P-5) has been made to respondent No.2, which has not been considered and decided so far. Learned counsel states that at this stage, the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide the said representation in accordance with law. In view of the above, after hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, without issuing notice of motion as it will unnecessary delay the matter, we dispose of this petition with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Palwal, to consider and decide the representation dated 29.7.2011 (Annexure P-5) in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE October 03, 2011 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) ndj JUDGE