SlnsSe Ben IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTKG BILASPUR fC.G.1 AT PETITIONER: W.P.fSl No..&fe.t.b..../2008 Ramsajiwan Aged about 28 Years S/o Shri Sonai R/o Village Khongapani, Tehsil Manendragarh, District Koria (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTSi .Nu ^ v </r •^' ..' (»• <*" f.^ ><u ..V ^^ / 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes Development Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Commissioner Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes Development, Pandit Ravi Shankar Shukla Vishwavidyalaya Campus, Raipyr, (Chhattisgarh) ^ • 3. Sub-Divisional Officer Revenue Department Manendragarh District Koria (C.G.) 4. Tehsildar Manendragarh District Koriya (C.G.) 5. Superintendent of Police Bilaspur^WTiici' Bilspur(C.G.) '^•:I- ®l-'t PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHERSUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- y ^? mGH CQURT OI; CHHA'mSGARHATBILAS WKIT FETtTIQN (S) No. 6616 of2008 PETITIONER : Rams^jiwm. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. ~s-& o POstforproiiouBceinentofDrderon......j<t<;.dayofAHgust,2010 Sd/- . SarishK.Agnihotn Judge mGH GOURT OF GHHATTISGARHAT BIL WRIT EETITION (S) No. 6616 6f2008 . PETITIONEB. : REUnsajbvan. VERSUS, . . ' : ,' ! RESPONDENTS : StateofChhattisgarh&Others. yiyT PETITION UNDES.ARTICEE 226 OF THE£'ONSTITUTIONOF INDIA 8B: Hon'l»l&SUi-i Satislt K. Agnihotri, Jt Pt'esent: ShriJitendraPaliandShriMateeriSiddique,Advocateforthe petitioner. Shri A.S.Kaolfllwaba, DeputyAdyocate General wMlShri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy GoveiimieHt Advocate fhr the Statg/ respcindents. OIIDER :': ' •!.' : , i! (E>eliveredoii;./.?.^8ayQf August, 2010) Bytheinsta.nypetifion,tUe.pelitionerseeksa directiori t6 the respondetit No. 3 i.e. the Sub Divisional Officer, Manefldragarh, Distriet Koria, to issueacastecertificatetothepetitioner. . Grievariee of the petitiouer is that the respondent No. 3 i.e. the 8ub Diyisional Officer, ManendTagarh, has rejected the applicatlcjn of the petitioner fbr issuance of a pennanent caste certificate on Ihe groiitid that the Retitioner has failed to produce land reeords prior to tiie yeai- 1950,wliichismandatory. ; The caste certificates are issued on fhe basis of circulars, dlTectidhs aiid guidelines.issued by the. Supreme Court m Kiimwi Madhwi'Patil and another y. Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development and dthers which has been fbHowed by this Qowt in Narendra Dehariya v; State of CHhattisgarh&Others^. , '(1994)6SCC24l' ^ •' 2 W.P.(C)N. 5070/2007; decidedon 27.09.2007 hl —iff :»^€^ •^y:-rf"' 'l^£l'yf1e"" ':1 f; i' w- •Qo\»rl 7. The afbresaidissue cameup irrto eonsideratioi^b.eftife a Diviston Benctl ofthis Courtm NarendraDehariya (suprq) &. oQier CQmiected matters, whefeinitwas obBefvBdagunder: "Thereafter the Govemment: has issued anofher' order dated 27.06.2007 . wherein definitionof botiaflde resiyentsojFChhattisgarhhasbeendefinedandexplalned which inellides (i) persQn belbnging to fhe cetifral cervices posted at . Chhattisgarh, their spouses or childreh (ii) alt the employees of State ofChhattisgarii, fheir spoilses Qr ;chilclTen; (iii) Persons appolnteff^Qii Constitutipnal or Statutory ^ppsts hy President pf ladla, theil spouses or childt-en; (iv) Corporadpns, Agetieles, . CMnnusslQns Bpaj-d's, QfBcials/QfGGers/employees, their spouses or Children. This Govemment order is to toenefit.the petitioners-students with respeet to: bonafide residentsofGhhattisgarh. ; ^ We are' of llfe; constdsi^ 'ppBMOn iJiat c persons have been recpgnized as residents 'of efthattisgM,:tNn l ^smne®alc>gy:s^ piuyose of;the adaussion.of cluldren of the eategories referred to^hsreitlaboYe are Goncemed,iif their caste is induded in the Presidential Order." - The said order hasneitherbeen amendednor modified nor set aside by the superior court. The sarne remains as it is. . Havitig regard fo the abQyestated^Observations and directions passed by fhis Court.in. NarenSra Dehariya (sipra) the tespondent'MQ.3 is directed to consider the case of the petitioner and pass appropriate order m accordanc&vnth law,.witlMut:'ihsisting on production of:(tie'latid records ;prior tb the year 1950, as -tand-recoFds alone are i iibti ttie requirerEtent. . • i •With fHe; afbresaid .observstion and direction, the writ'petifioB •is disposedof. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge