IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (c.G.) / / w.P‘ ‘tx/Io.’%j_&£§r 12005 Manisha Tiwari Wlo. Vishwajeet Tiwari Aged about 28 years Rlo. Ranisagar Ward, No.12, Pithora, Dist. Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1// The State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary Panchayat D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) PETITIONER Secretary Department of Education D.K,S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Mahasamund District — Mahasamund (C.G.) The Collector District Mahasamund (C.G.) Saraipati,Distt Mahasamund (C.G.) Geetanjaii, D/o Birahchi Lal Bagarti ‘R/o: Vin. Koragarh, Po’st Baioda, Via-Saraipali, Dist. Mahasamund (C.G.) Ku. Kajal Joshi, D/o. K.K. Joshi, R/o. Mahavir Colony,Behind Higher School Field, Mahasamund, District. Mahasamund(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227’OF THE CON§FI1TUTION OF INDtA at / 03.08.2005 Shn' R. Mm, counsei for the pwtioncr. ’ Shri Arun‘ Sao, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents No. 1, 2 6r. 4 on advance copy. W.P. No.3184 of 2005: - Heaxd on admission. ’ By way ofthiq wlit pe1ition med under Mich 226/227 of the Cons1itution of India, the pmih'orier has mainly challenged the appoinunents of respondents No. 5 85 6 to the post .of Shikshakarmi Grade-II (Engliah Temhcx) in Dism'ct Pancha’yat Mahasamund, Dishict—Mahasamund (C.G.) Admittedly; the appoin ents‘of the mspondents No. 5 & 6 are governed by. the provision of M.P. (C.G.) Panchayat Shikohn Karmis (Recruitmmt and Con iiions of Service) Rules, 1997. Rule 12 of the aforesaid rules pro ' es for an appeal against the 01der V passed/covered under the afore aid roles. Since them is alreadyp vision of appeal which according to me is an e$caeious alteman‘ve remedy available to the pen'tioner, I am not inclined to entertain writ petition. The writ petition is dis'missed. nSel for the petitioner prays for appropriate appeal before the edtothe ‘h'oner. At this stage, learned - gaming him a liberty to Appellate Authority. This lib ' u t XI-H—22 C a7; 200;; If so advised, the petitig Appellate, Authority nude; Rule disposed of at mgh'on's'tagg. v Certmed copy as per rule >of. ner may £1: an appeal befoxe the 12 of the afomsaid Rules. With the afomsaid qbSewaijons, fhis petition ‘is §nally \‘ Sd/- S. Synil Kumar Sinha -v ~ Judge (@W) mm 7 mmgWh-baa3'g4” Consequently, M_.W.P. No. 2667 of 2005 also stands disposed , W 1mm t amm- mmm ‘ . -2r WW*WW » %WW