SCA/6216/2004 1/3 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6216 of 2004 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI ============================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ============================================================== NATVARLAL ATMARAM PATEL - Petitioner(s) Versus GUJARAT STATE CO-OP COTTON FEDERATION LTD - Respondent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : MR AK CLERK for Petitioner(s) : 1, MR AY KOGJE for Respondent(s) : 1, ================================================================== CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI Date : 25/10/2005 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. It is jointly stated by the learned advocates appearing for the parties that the issues arising in the present petition having been settled between the SCA/6216/2004 2/3 JUDGMENT petitioner and the respondent. The petitioner has filed the present petition claiming certain monetary benefits challenging the order passed by the Labour Court in recovery proceedings. 2. Towards the said claims as a full and final settlement the respondent has agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 70,000/- to the petitioner which the petitioner agrees to accept as a full and final settlement of his claim arising under the petition. Respondent agrees to pay a sum of Rs. 25,000/- on or before 14/11/2005, a sum of Rs. 20,000/- on 21/11/2005 and sum of Rs. 25,000/- on or before 30th December, 2005. Upon this assurance to the Court, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Managing Director of the respondent company shall file an undertaking to this Court within a period of one week that the above mentioned payments will be made within the prescribed time. Learned advocate Shri Clerk submitted that the claim of the petitioner for interest on the delayed deposit of the provident fund amount is not being given up. Learned advocate Ms. Sneha Jani for learned advocate Mr.Kogje submitted that this claim is not part of the present petition and the respondent reserves liberty to raise all contentions in SCA/6216/2004 3/3 JUDGMENT this regard. In view of the above development, learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Permission granted. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. (Akil Kureshi, J.) smita/