IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1234 of 2010 MAHESH THAKUR S/O LATE YUGAL KISHORE THAKUR, R/O VILLAGE-CHAK MAHADDIN, P.O. JANDAHA, P.S. JANDAHA, DISTRICT- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR ………….PETITIONER…APPELLANT Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 5. THE DISTRICT TEACHER APPOINTMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 7. THE BLOCK TEACHERS APPOINTMENT COMMITTEE, JANDAHA BLOCK THROUGH THE PRAMUKH-CUM-THE CHAIRMAN OF APPOINTMENT COMMITTEE, P.O. & P.S.- JANDAHA, DISTRICT- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 8. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER-CUM-SECRETARY, BLOCK TEACHERS APPOINTMENT COMMITTEE, JANDAHA, DISTRICT- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 9. SURENDRA RAI S/O LATE AMIR RAI R/O VILLAGE AND P.O.- SARMASTIPUR, P.S. MAHNAR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR ……….REPONDENTS………RESPONDENTS ----------- 2. 06.07.2011 Heard Mr. S.B.K. Mangalam for the appellant, and Mr. Sandeep Patil, learned Assistant Counsel to G.P. No. 14. This appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the High Court of Judicature at Patna has been preferred by the petitioner of C.W.J.C. 8411 of 2010, and is aggrieved by the order dated 23.7.2010, whereby the writ petition has been dismissed by a learned Single Judge of this Court, and the order dated 9.10.2009, passed by the learned District Teacher Appointment Appellate Tribunal, Vaishali, has been upheld. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties. It appears the selection process for appointment of Block Teachers of Jandaha Block was challenged before the learned Tribunal on the ground that the authorities had maintained different registers to record the selection process, and performance of some of the candidates were done orally. It further appears that the Tribunal gave repeated opportunity to the authorities to produce the relevant record which they failed to do. They completely fail to appear before the Tribunal, let alone the question to producing the relevant records for the perusal of the Tribunal. Consequently the learned Tribunal allowed the application by order dated 9.10.2009 whereby the entire selection process has been cancelled, with the further direction for re-counselling on a pre-fixed date with due publicity and information to all concerned. In this narration of events, it is evident that the learned Tribunal passed an appropriate order which has rightly been upheld by the learned Single Judge. We do not find any ground for interference with the same. The appeal is dismissed. Fahad ( S.K. Katriar, J. ) ( Vikash Jain, J. )