IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2644 of 2011 MAKESHWAR MAHTO, SON OF SRI MURAL MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.2872 of 2011 AWADHESH RAM, SON OF RAM PHAL RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 10.03.2011 Both the above stated criminal miscellaneous cases arise out of Jamui P.S. Case No. 344 of 2009 registered under Sections 341, 323, 141 and 295 A of the Indian Penal Code and accordingly, both the above stated criminal miscellaneous cases are being disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Admittedly, all the Sections are bailable except Section 295 A of the Indian Penal Code. It appears from perusal of the impugned order of learned Sessions Judge, Jamui that in course of investigation, witnesses stated that informant was never obstructed from offering the Namaz rather the dispute arose on account of a piece of land, which was being used by the general public as play ground and grazing animals. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with above stated Jamui P.S. Case No. 344 of 2009. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )