IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3064 of 2008 Between: Regonda Bixapathi and another ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS AND Regonda Pentaiah and eight others ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS ORDER: This revision is directed against the order dated 02-06-2008 passed in I.A.No.330 of 2006 in O.S.No.27 of 1996 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Bhongir, whereby and whereunder the learned Senior Civil Judge directed the parties to appear for making lots in respect of the divided property. 2. Notice before admission came to be ordered on 25-07-2008. The respondent Nos.2 to 5 entered appearance through a counsel. Despite service of notice, respondent Nos.6 and 7 did not choose to enter into appearance either in person or through a counsel. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 4. Sri P.V. Vidyasagar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the trial court ought not to have directed the parties to appear for making lots in respect of the divided property having authorized the Commissioner to allot shares to several parties. 5. As seen from the records the Commissioner divided the property as the preliminary decree and filed report and thereupon the court directed the parties to appear for making lots in respect of divided property. There is no irregularity or illegality in directing the parties to appear before the court for making lots in respect of divided property. 6. Therefore, this revision is devoid of merits and accordingly, same may be dismissed at the stage of admission. ___________________________ B. SESHASAYANA REDDY, J February 25, 2010. PN THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3064 of 2008 February 25, 2010