1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.55 OF 2009 Smt.Arvinda Hasmukhray Shukla & ors ..Applicants V/s Smt.Kanchanben Maheshbhai Shah ..Respondent Mr.Rohit Kapadia, Senior Advocate with Mr.V.A.Thorat, Senior Advocate with Mr.Atit N. Shukla with Mr.Ketan Upadhyay i/b.Mr.P.R.Sachdev, Advocate, for the applicants Mr.Jawahar J. Thakkar, Advocate, for the respondent CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATE : 6TH MARCH, 2009 P.C. . The Civil Revision Application challenges an order passed by a Bench of the Small Causes Court, Mumbai on application Exh.6 filed by the petitioners in Appeal No.148 of 2008 filed by the respondent impugning the decree of eviction passed by the learned Single Judge of the Small Causes Court. 2 2. Looking to the challenge raised in the above Civil Revision Application and considering the proviso to Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in my view, the above Civil Revision Application is not maintainable. It would, therefore, be open for the petitioners to file appropriate proceedings to challenge the impugned order. With the aforesaid observations, the above Civil Revision Application is disposed of as not maintainable. (R.M.SAVANT, J.)