miemixxl AP’PLICzwioiq i§‘“&eél3§i e-E 1996 . AinPL‘ICJagg :- Santosh Kumar Son OE $hri Mangtu Deshlahre; age& about 3o yrs, R/o Kasharidih, n&ar Azad Chowk, Ward No. "38, mrg, Tah and’Distt Dui‘g (M.P.) versug ReSponéent§ g— 1. State of {ghP‘w bdie > through tha W of Roma Mam _ W' (F‘olica‘ Department ) ' ‘ PHQ; Bhopal M.§. 2». ’birect’or Gsneral of Police my. Police E~I.§i}. Bhaapal muEy 3. 19.x. G. Felice Bhilai mm Bhilai. 4. .'1.6. ?e’lice, Raipu'r Zo‘ne, Raipur a. Sigpat of"POlice mxg, ta’h an& 'distt mrg I‘LP‘. wPLlcmIgN gzs 19 OF g‘g‘ggQMINIswRéi'IVE ggggmw‘m .J Aggggs 5; ' " «do M§%\\\’\@9\ EjGH CGURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETYHQN (S) No. 1435 0f2005 APPLICANT : Santosh Kumar. VERSUS RESPONDENTS State ofM.P. & others. APPLICATION U/S 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL’S ACT. 1985 W SB: fion’ble Shri Satish K. Aonihotri. J. Present: None for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for {he Siate. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on O8 day of December, 2009) The matter is calied for hean‘ng twice. None appeals nor any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In ofthe In View above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. 3. Registry is directed to send a copy ofthis order to the petitioner, fonhwith. Sd/4 V Satish K. Agnihotri \ Judge Aim V