IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO.409/2010 Vishnugupt Constructions Private Limited ..vs.. Madhav Narayan Chimote & another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.P.Kothari, advocate for appellant Shri M.M.Pimpalgaonkar, advocate for R-1 &2 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : May 03, 2010 . Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. Admit. Call R & P. Shri Pimpalgaonkar, the learned advocate waives notices of hearing on behalf of respondent no.1 & 2. JUDGE CIVIL APPCLIATION [CAF] NO.947/2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is brought to the notice of this court by the learned counsel for the applicant that the trial court had by order dated 20.8.2005 directed both the parties not to alienate suit property or create third party interest therein during the pendency of the proceedings before the trial court. Since the first appeal is admitted, it would be necessary to pass similar order in the first appeal also. The respondents are therefore restrained from alienating or creating any third party interest in the suit property during the pendency of the first appeal. Since both the parties claim to be in possession of the suit property, it would not be possible to grant relief claimed by the respondent no.1 & 2. However, the parties are directed to maintain status-quo as regards possession. Civil application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. JUDGE smp