@ IN Ti-E HIGH COURT OF JUD’ICATURE RT BIWPIR(CPMTTI$GARH) WRIT pBTITION No. {318%, OF 2003 f ggwxTmNERs 3o V§R_S>US_J / 694W Mohammeé Raza ,son of Ashique Ali , aged about 55 years , presently worki ng as Head Cons table , Te .‘Le com , (Operatcr ) a Ram Narayan Chaturvedi ,son of yamuna PraSad Chaturvedi, aged about 39 years,present1y Working as Constable(Te lecom) , a Both are posted at Police Head Quarter, (Telecom) ,Bhilai , Dis trict—Durg, (CoGJ Ram Das $en,SQn of C.Pa8en, aged about 48 years ,presently working as Head Constable, Telecom,posted at Police Station Kondagaon, (Telecom Station), Jagdalpur', District-Bastar. (C¢Ge) RQOp Kishor Bhagoria. son of Shri Basanti Lal Bhagoria,aged about 39 years, presntly working as Constable,‘1‘elecom,p05ted at Poli ce S ta t1 on-Konda gaon , (Telecom Station). Jagdalpur, District Bastar.(c.c;.) u P o RESPO WENTEa‘ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF Tl-E.‘ COASTITUTION OF Imm. Union of India, through the S'ecretaxy,Department of Personnel/Public Grievances and PenSion,Ilnd iloor, LokNayak Bhawan,Khan Market, New Delhi, State o£ Madhya Prades h, through Secretarymepartment of Home A‘uitairs,Vallabh Bhawan,Bh0pal, (M eP . ) State of Chhattis garh, through Secretarymepartment of Home Aimirs ,D .K .s .Building. Mantralaya,Raipur, Dis tra‘. ct Raipur, (C. G. ) .“2”. HIGH COURI‘ OF‘ CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ' g$ Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Jusu'ce Satish K. Agnihotri. Writ Petit'on No. 3 198 of 2003 Mohammed Raza Versus Respondents Union of India 8r. others Petitioner Shli B. D. Guru, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri S. K. Ben'wal, Standing counsel for Respondent No. 1. Shri Sandeep Dubey, Govt. Advocate for Respondents No. 3. Shri V. C. Otfalwar, Advocate for respondent No. 2. ORAL ORDER ( 21” February, 2006) The following order of the Oourt was passed by Satish K. Apihotri,J. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that the petitioners, Who are working in the Home Department, are permanent residents of the State of Madhya Pradesh. They had submitted their option for the State of Madhya Pradesh. The petin'oners have been allocated to the State of Chhattisgarh and they want their reallocation to the State of Madhya Pradesh. learned counsel for the petitioners, on instruch'on, submits that the petih‘oners be granted liberty to make a representation to the respondents for redressal of their grievances. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection to the said submission. 2. In view of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of finally, with liberty to the petitioners to make appropriate representation to the respondents/authorities concerned, within a period of two weeks hem today, and the tespondents/ authorities are directed to consider and decide the same, in an objective manner, in accordance with law, Within a period of eight weeks hom the date of receipt of the representation, if any. Certined copy, as per Rules. Sdl— TY.” ‘ / satish K. Aznilwm Judge w i Thakur j t