-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.699 OF 2005 Arvind Purohit & anr. .. .. Petitioners v/s. The State of Mah. & ors. .. Respondents Mr.A.M. Saraogi for petitioners. Mr.Sanjeev Kanchan for res.No.4. ---- CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & S.C.DHARMADHKARI, JJ. S.C.DHARMADHKARI, JJ. S.C.DHARMADHKARI, JJ. DATED : 9TH MARCH 2005 DATED : 9TH MARCH 2005 DATED : 9TH MARCH 2005 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Saraogi in support of this petition. Mr.Kanchan appears for respondent No.4-Bank. 2. Respondent No.4-Bank has a claim against respondent Nos.2 and 3 in whose flat the petitioners are staying. Respondent No.4 appears to have initiated an action under the Securitisation Act. The petitioners have a remedy either to file an appeal under Section 17 of the Securitisation Act or to file a suit in case they are contending that they have an independent right. We cannot interfere through a -2- writ jurisdiction. Petition is dismissed. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)