THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.25832 of 2005 Dated 14-12-2005 Between: R.A. Dayanand. ..... PETITIONER AND The Chief General Manager, Hyderabad, and five others. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.25832 of 2005 O R D E R: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 4. This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the alleged inaction on the part of the respondents 1 to 4 in taking action against the fifth respondent for allegedly changing and removing the existing transformer at the premises bearing municipal No.5-9-22/1/1/3, Ashoka Chambers, Adarsh Nagar, Hyderabad. The petitioner states that though he made complaints on 16-11-2005 and 01-12-2005 to the respondents 1 to 4 bringing to their notice the alleged illegal action of the respondents 5 and 6, they failed to take the necessary action. Having heard the learned counsel for both the parties and having regard to the nature of the controversy involved in the writ petition, without expressing any opinion on merits, I deem it appropriate to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 16-11-2005 and 01-12-2005 and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Needless to mention that before taking any such action, the respondents 5 and 6 shall be put on notice and shall be afforded an opportunity to rebut the allegations made by the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. _____________ (G. ROHINI, J) Date:14-12-2005 ghn THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.9260 of 2002 Dated 17-10-2005 Between: K. Padmavathi. ..... PETITIONER AND The District Collector and Agent to the Government., E.G. District at Kakinada, and two others. .....RESPONDENTS