IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3110 of 2011 MANOJ PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. It is a very peculiar case in which the mother is informant whereas son is accused against whom there is allegation that he committed murder of his father for getting Govt. job in his place on compassionate ground. Although petitioner is named in the FIR and in course of investigation, several witnesses including wife of the petitioner have supported the prosecution story but none of the person has seen the actual killing of the deceased. Except the confessional statement of co-accused, there is no cogent evidence to show the complicity of the petitioner in the alleged crime. From perusal of the impugned order, It is evident that in course of investigation, wife of the petitioner claimed before Investigating Officer that on the alleged date of occurrence, she had seen the petitioner washing blood stained cloth but admittedly, the aforesaid cloth has not been seized by the I.O. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Manoj Prasad @ Manoj Sah be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sessions Trial No. 786 of - 2 - 2009 arising out of Fatuha P. S. Case No. 10 of 2009 to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-Ist, Patna City, Patna. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)