c'^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP NO. | 5-30 /2003 ../" PETITIONER RESPONDg'ST 7" <^*- 'i^' ^%^-" ,•• ^&t.^Mye'P?" ^yy 1) Murl-idhar Sahu, aged about ^' 1/9 years, son of Late Shri Chaleshwar Gajpal, resident of "village Matrodih, PG Khupali, Police Station Utai, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, through : Its Secretary, Danganiyan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh State' Electricity Board, 400 K.V. Sub Station, Khedamara, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G.). Chairman, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Danganiyan, Raipur, JShKattisgarh. /^ y^ ../--""" WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE '22Jf'6F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN^S'PROPRIATE WRETl IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS / CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION / ORDER IN THE LIKE NATUKE ETC. To XI-HC-22 3II$?T^( Wi* sn^i, ^ni^ ^iitT !\^ y- /'V .££: 3Sf 'apTRpt, aiii'M'is, faMi'yy ....UL3.P....).^..--^©... tfracIT th*<l°h * T| 1'^' - 311^51 wnwafe? 26-3-2004 Shri R. M. Pandey, counsel Shri BhaskarPyasl, Panel Lf Heard both the counsel; The petitioner has prefer;|i 226/227 ofthe Constitution of indi^ direeting the respondente to compassionate ground. The petitioner's case is tha( Pradesh State Etectricifr/ Board a^ father whlle serving under respoit 17-4-2000, the petiSioner had si on compassionate ground to th^ Centre, Bhiiai, which was forwardeU The application'ofthe petitioner Raipur on 7-7-2000 with'a note t<; petitioner again submitted an apjsl respondent No.1 ors 9-12-2002. Learned counset for the issued appointment orders ground. Counse! further submitte<) make a repr^sentation to be directed to decide the tearned counsel for respondent No| Havlng heard She tearnedi regard to the facts and cir repres^htation reumstences chi&i[<n4ii ^f+^f'^i^'^ '<.f<i*$K q?3ipgt(3ii^i wthepetitjoner. nvyer for respondent No.3. ted this writ petition under Artides I whereby the petiSioner has prayed for .ider and appoint the petitioner on cons his father was appointed in Madhya Security Guardon 15-12-79 and his tdents had expired on 30-10-99. On ubtnitSed an apptication for appointment Executive Enaineer; Division Sub tQChief Engineer, M.P.E.B., Raipur. tvas retumed by the Chief Engineer, <> apply in prescribed proforma. The lication in a prescribed proforma to tfetif etitioner submitted that respondents to many persons on compassionate tbat the petitioner may be aitowed to 1 & 2 and respondents 1 & 2 may of the petitioner to which the 3 has no objection. counsel for the parties and having the case, the petitiorier is ~T XI-HC-22 'Svt •<<iq|c|t|, '&Tll^'IS, (»«>1I*<1< ^ "ffpR-iiw-irai 3}I^f?iI R-I sn^r shKi+'sffg K' sn^i's^iraT-'afet * ailowed to m-ake a detalted repres^ respondents 1&2 within a period respondents 1&2 wili decide the ref^ period of 30 days from the dat^ considerins a!! the flEievances of th^ order. Inviewofthis order. I.A. No.9E With the aforesaid directions, Parties are entitied for certified ^itatlon raising all his grfevances to days from today and inturn, ^•esentation of the petitioner within a of receipt of the representation petitioner and wifl pass a reasoned ^93/2003 stands disposed of. this writ petition is disposed of. copy of this order. •wifepNim?if ^ fs^ Tfss?R 'T aipgq sii^r Sd/- , L.C.BHADOO Judge' {•^tfeq M