1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.3913/2010 Anawar Vs. State Date of order : 18/5/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Ali Mohd. Khan for the petitioner. Shri Amit Punia, P.P. for the State. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected only because in January, 2010, another case for offence under Section 379 was registered against him in which case, bail was granted to him by learned Court of Sessions, Kota on 13.1.2010. It is contended that in the present case the allegation against the petitioner and other three accused is that they purchased stolen motorcycle from one Hansraj Meghwal. All other three co-accused have already been enlarged on bail. Investigation is complete. Petitioner is in jail, in the present matter, since 13.2.2010. The only offence alleged against him is one under Section 411 of IPC. The trial of the case is likely to take long time. Learned Public Prosecutor has 2 opposed the bail application. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail. In the result, this bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Anawar S/o Late Sadiq Hussain shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No.67/2010, P.S. Kunadi, Distt. Kota City on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. However, in case the petitioner is found indulged in similar offence at any point of time, the prosecution would be at liberty to apply for cancellation of his bail before the Court of Sessions itself and the bail would be liable to be cancelled on this ground alone. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/