^iiaiisSSe MiGH COURT OF JUDJCATURECHHATTISGARH : BIL^SP6{ Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri S.R. Nayak, CJ Petitioner writt Petition No. 5835 OF 2006 Dr. Rashmi Jiteure, S/o Dr. R.K. Jitpure, Aged about 25 Years, R/o C.K. Awas, Q. No. D-3, Ashok Nagar, Sipat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- Secretary Health Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Indian Ayurveda Yunani and Homeopathic Medicat Science, Raipur (C.G.) Dean, Government Ayuroedic College, Raipur (C.G.) Dr. Geeta Jatav, I.P.G.T. & R.A. (Gujrat Uni Jamnagar Institute of Post graduateTeachers & Researeh in Ayurveda), Jamnagar, Gujarat. Present; Smt. Hamida Siddiqui, learned counsel forthe pet'rtioner. Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, leamed. Government for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 19 of December 2005) The petitioner herein got admission to B.A.M.S. Course on 19.9.98 in Generat category, in Govemment Ayurved College, Raipur. In the final examination of B.A.M.S., the 4 respondent herein who incidentally belongs to Scheduled Caste category and who secured the admission to BA.M.S. course on the basis of reserved category secured the highest marks in the examination and she was placed in serial No.1 in the merit lB3li"!i»)Sigaaii3SI> Q / list. In that view of the matter, the 4 respondent was given job in the general category. The grievance of the petitioner in this petition is that since the 4 respondent had secured the admission to B.A.M.S. Course on the basis of that she betongs to reserved category, she should not have been allotted the house job treating her as the one from the general category. There is no m.erit in this contention raised on behalf of the petitioner. It is well settled that a candidate belonging to a reserved category competes with candidates beionging to general category and sscures an employment on the basis of his superior merit in the general category, it cannot be said that such a candidate should not have been given appointment against the quota meant for general category of candidates and that he should have been considered oniy against the quota meant for ressrved category to which such candidate belongs. In that view of the matter, what has been done by the respondents in allotting the house-job to the 4 respondent who is admittedly has secured highest marks (1 rank) in B.A. M.S. examination, is unexceptionable. The writ petition is devoid of msrit and it is accordingly dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Chief Justice •s^o