CR No.3212 of 2009 (O&M) - 1 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.3212 of 2009 (O&M) Decided on: 31.08.2009 **** Prithi Ram . . . . Petitioner VS. Dharambir and another . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. I.D.Singla, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sanjay Vij, Advocate for the respondent **** SURYA KANT J.(ORAL) This revision petition is directed by the petitioner-plaintiff whose application under Order 39 Rule 1&2 read with Section 151 of CPC has been dismissed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gurgaon vide its order dated 01.02.2008 and his appeal against the said order has also been dismissed by the learned Additional District Judge, Gurgaon vide his judgement dated 27.03.2009. Notice of motion was issued and in pursuance thereto, counsel for the parties have been heard. There is no gainsaying that a revisional Court has a very limited scope to interfere with the orders passed by the Courts below in ad interim injunction matters, especially when no case of exceeding the jurisdiction or perversity is made out. The Courts below have rightly followed the well established principles while declining ad interim injunction to the petitioner. In any case, alienation of the alleged joint property by the respondent-defendants, if any, shall be governed by the principles of lis pendens. CR No.3212 of 2009 (O&M) - 2 - Dismissed. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 31.08.2009 shonkar