THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2792 OF 2009 Dated: 19.11.2009 Between: A. K. Seenappa … petitioner And The United Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by its Branch Manager, Hindupur. … Respondent THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2792 OF 2009 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. The petitioner herein is the claimant No.2 in O.P.No.127 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hindupur. By order, dated 14.12.2007, the Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- with subsequent interest at 6% per annum and declared that the Claimant No.2/Revision petitioner shall be entitled for Rs.60,000/- out of the compensation so awarded. However there was a direction by the Tribunal to deposit the amount into Court and the claimants were granted liberty to withdraw Rs.25,000/- each. It is not in dispute that the Revision petitioner has accordingly withdrawn Rs.25,000/- and the balance has been kept in Fixed Deposit for a period of three years. However, subsequently the petitioner filed I.A.No.231 of 2009 with a prayer to permit him to withdraw the remaining Rs.41,976/- also together with accrued interest. The said application was dismissed by the Court below by order dated 15.4.2009 on the ground that the Fixed Deposit Receipt (FDR) has not yet matured. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. As could be seen from the material on record, the Revision petitioner /claimant No.2 is a major and literate person. In the affidavit filed in support of the application, it is explained that he is getting married and that apart the amount is required for establishment of business for his livelihood. There is no justifiable reason to disbelieve the version of the petitioner and at any rate the mere fact that the FDR has not matured is not a valid ground to reject the permission sought by the claimant to withdraw the compensation. Admittedly his request is to permit him to withdraw the amount as per the apportionment made by the Tribunal in O.P.No.127 of 2006. In the circumstances, the order dated 15.04.2009 is hereby set aside and I.A.No.231 of 2009 in O.P.No.127 of 2006 is allowed as prayed for. Civil Revision Petition is accordingly allowed. No costs. ____________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 19.11.2009 gbs