1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 569/2007 (Syed Sameer Quadri Syed Masud Kadri Vs. Z.P., Akola & ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM :D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 29, 2008. Heard Mr. Palshikar for the petitioner, Mr. Mishra for the respondent nos. 1 and 2, and Mr. De for respondent no. 3. Mr. Palshikar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that in view of the statement made in the affidavit filed by Zilla Parishad in Writ Petition No. 5172/2006, this Court, vide order dated 21/11/2006, disposed of the said writ petition. It is further submitted that issue involved in the present writ petition being identical to one involved in Writ Petition No. 5172/2006, present petition may be disposed of accordingly. The counsel for the respondent-Zilla Parishad, does not dispute 2 the factual aspect of the matter. Considered the contentions canvased and perused the order dated 21/11/2006 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 5172/2006, which reads thus: “Heard Shri Palshikar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Gaikee, learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the statement made by respondent nos. 1 and 2 in para (2) of the affidavit dated 16/11/2006, grievance of the petitioners does not survive. The petition is disposed of accordingly. However, we expect the respondents to take a decision at the earliest.” Since it is not disputed that issue involved in the present writ petition is identical to one involved in the earlier writ petition, present writ petition is also disposed of in terms of the above order. JUDGE JUDGE RMP