GIFP^ffi O' 'fli-'- ' C" ^/cS^/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARHI WRIT PETITION fSINO^ 7^^-2s OF 2006 PETITIONER ,l/ , Chandrabali Ram Son of Late Shri Lahara Ram,a - ged about 42 .•ot^ \rs.^K- years, Resident ofVillage Jirhul, ,^y-''^-"'"^ ''—-'.—.—.- -. ....-3- -....„., Post Bhulsikala, Tahsil Kusmi, District Surguja (C.G.). /.^v;^^ ^^<v^k--^ ^s^" ^*° VERSUS RESPONDENTS \-^ l.^^-0^ ^<^v c\Y'3 ^y^r^ • ^^^^ .crl »- ^G.^^B ^Rto B- 3. 4. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supplies Corporation ^Limited,') D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Managing Director, C.G. State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Raipur (C.G.). The General Manager (Administration), C.G. State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Bal Ashram Parisar, Kachahari Chowk Raipur (C.G.). The District Manager, C.G. State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). •^y^ ^^- sfcK- 's^ ^g' '^I^ •^® w 'ss^ '^s' :.^^ ^S^!". ~h'B- ^ WRIT PEriTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION ETC. ISSi- 'y^ ^•^" ••^ST"-. c.: <e "-{.' & ^gsRI^, i^ ^S^g^^tS^ £^£^ *&. . 'Si ^ ,T-'\\',\ (I-HC—7! o 311^1 ^lfiFTO ^Sff SH^T'SRRT -3£f NWdl <b*1!sh 5is[ -^wiw^, •a'<:\\v,S, ^wwy. ^..W..:£..fo^..?hie.....7..&.2...^, 311^1 tpRT (lyf^«l<q) B«1]W^te 3ffl%51 Shri V.K. Pandey, counse'l Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, F| S'nri V.R. Tiwari, counsei fct Challenge in the presenj 21.6.2005 (Annexure P-1) .pass^ ad hoc promotlon granted to thj iround that upon consideration promotion he has not bsen found Counsel for the petitioner 1.8. W.P. No. 3307/2006 ( Birent Chhattisgarh & ot'ners) an ord^ 28.6,2010 perrnitting the petitionl appeliate authority and, therefore| rnay be permitfed to file appeai b^ ciaim and In turn the Board of Di| on meriSs. !t has been pointed out b; been found fit for promotion on acj 2003-04, however, iater on the s^ consideratson of representation petitioner was again granted prom) Counsel for respondents N< subsequent deveiopments to th^ omltted and the promotion wa; *l'<Ifl<fl-< 'siPRff 4 fel€t<1<4^1< ilsfRnail^t 'or the petttioner. L for the State/respondents No.1 . respondents No. 2, 3 & 4. is to tn ^d by respondent No. 2 by which the petitioner has been canceied on the ^f the case of the petitioner for reguiar pt for the said post. ^ubmlts that in the identica! writ petition tiranath Mishra & another Vs. State of I- has been passed by this Court on ^r to file appropriate appea! before the in the present case also, the petitioner fcfore the Board of Directors detailing his ^ectors be directed to decide his appeai the partles that the petitioner has not jcount of adverse remarks for the period kid adverse remarks were omitted upon by the petitioner and thereafter the ombtion. 4). 2, 3 and 4 submits that because of the effect that the adverse remarks was granted, respondents are willing to ^fl"^ VSs- 1. '?£ ^ ^.. \. y^^-^' .^y 'aiteu&3a-HC- ail^l ^i R-lH ^P?T SffI^T <si*n<ft ^ ^. A€? ^ST ";:;TPTIcT2T, 'S^ftWR, fs«niy'j,< W^ff ((,qr%""--'-----"--"-"--"-^ 200 311^1'q^T ('^lfS5!^) ?wiW «^asn^n -2-- etitiitner consider the case of the petitiij) to grant of proforma promotiorl that the petitioner is require<j Recruitment and Promotion Rit Considering the fair sut( is permitted to withdraw this ioard of Directors. !n the e\t before the Board of Directors receipt of copy of this order, i< decidethe same within furtherl With ihe aforesaid direct |missions made by the parties, the petitioner letition wit'n iiberty to file appeai before the |entua!ity of filing appeat by the petitioner <|vith a period of one months from the date of is expected Trom the appeilate authority to ithree months. |tions, the petition stands dlsposed of. V/l *b^l<"1'ift*1 'H)*ifff "^ "fe^ <t^R^K ^affllHsil^ir and pass necessary orders with regard and on the aspect of recovery. He submits to file appeai in view of the Rule 24 of Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge