1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1 OF 2010 (Shri Sahebrao Kanhuji Raut vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JANUARY 04, 2010. Heard Shri Chaware, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. Khade, learned AGP for respondents No. 1 to 3 and Shri Saboo, learned counsel for respondent No.4. The contention is, the petitioner could not attend the meeting and therefore his legal rights are violated. With the assistance of learned counsel, I have perused the impugned order. The Additional Collector, in his order dated 14.10.2009 expressly recorded that the petitioner told the Additional Collector that he was advised by the Tahsildar not to attend the meeting. I have heard the learned counsel on this point as this is the only issue being pressed. The learned counsel states that this statement of fact appearing in the order of the Additional Collector is correct. He has further informed that as five Councilors were against the petitioner, the Tahsildar advised the petitioner, not to attend the meeting. It is apparent that the petitioner has 2 taken the risk by listening to the advise of the Tahsildar. No case is, therefore, made out warranting any interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.