IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 25TH OCTOBER 2011 / 3RD KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 24910 of 2011(K) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- N.S.HARINARAYANAN, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DIVISION, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD. BY ADVS. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. SRI.T.G.SUNIL (PRANAVAM) SRI.K.R.GANESH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (IRRIGATION AND ADMINISTRATION), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033. BY SR.GOVT.PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AV WPC.NO.24910/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 : COPY OF G.O.NO.13070/A1/07/WRD DATED 27.12.2007 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE G.O.(RT.)NO.196/2008/WRD DATED 13.2.2008 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE STATEMENT TOWARDS ABSTRACT OF INCOME AND EXPENDITURE FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4 : COPY OF G.O.(RT.)NO.674/08/WRD DATED 28.6.2008 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXT.P5 : COPY OF THE G.O.(RT.)NO.201/2009/WRD DATED 18.2.2009 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXT.P6 : COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 9.3.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT. EXT.P7 : COPY OF THE REMINDER NO.E1-2463/92(VOL.II) DATED 7.7.2011 ISSUED BY THE EXEC.ENGINEER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P8 : COPY OF THE G.O.(P)NO.18/97/VIG.DATED 5.4.1997 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A TO JUDGE AV K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.24910 of 2011-K. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 25th October, 2011. J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed complaining that the first respondent has till date not declared the probation of the petitioner in the category of Executive Engineer. The Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that there are certain corrections in the proforma that the petitioner had been directed to correct and return. However, since the corrected proforma has not been received, the probation could not be declared. 2. Counsel for the petitioner offers that the corrected proforma will be submitted within a week. The learned Government Pleader assures that the corrected proforma along with the report of the vigilance would be forwarded to the Government immediately thereafter for the purpose of ensuring that the probation of the petitioner WP(C).No.24910/2011-K. 2 is declared without delay. 3. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to forward the corrected proforma along with the vigilance report, within two weeks of receipt of the corrected proforma of the petitioner to the Government for the purpose of declaring the probation of the petitioner in the category of Executive Engineer. The orders regarding the probation of the petitioner shall be passed within two weeks thereafter. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, (Judge) Kvs/-