IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29365 of 2008 AMIT KUMAR SINHA @ AMRIT RAJ ANAND Versus STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 2. 5.8.2008 Heard. The case is under Sections 395,398 and 412 of the Indian penal Code and as may appear from the rejection order itself, the recovery of the articles could not be fastened with the petitioner, it was from other’s house. It might be a case that while making recovery or soon thereafter the petitioner was apprehended consequent upon the confession by a co-accused who implicated the petitioner as one of the participants of the offence. Considering the fact that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. nor he was put on the Test Identification Parade in spite of being in custody since 17.1.2008 and that nothing was recovered from him, let the above named petitioner be directed to be released from custody on his furnishing a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 500/- only without any surety to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in Kotwali(Tilkamanjhi) P.S.Case No. 34 of 2008. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)