HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.2078 of 2003 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. This Appeal is directed against the order and decree, dated 29/01/2003, passed by the Judge, Family Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, dismissing the petition in H.M.O.P.No.22 of 2000 filed by the appellant seeking for dissolution of marriage and for divorce. The appellant is the petitioner-husband and the respondent is the respondent-wife, before the Court below. Both the parties to the Appeal, who remained present before this Court today, have identified each other as well as by their respective counsel. Further, both the parties have signed the application, and when inquired by this Court, both the parties admitted the contents of the Memorandum of Compromise, their signatures on the said application and expressed their willingness to have a compromise decree and that the signatures of the parties have also been identified by the learned counsel appearing on their behalf. As a part of the compromise, a Demand Draft bearing No.077430 dated 19/12/2009 for a sum of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs only), drawn on State Bank of Hyderabad, has been handed over by the husband to the wife, in the open Court, in the presence of their respective learned counsel. Having regard to the fact that the matter had been settled out of the Court between the parties to the present Appeal and also having regard to the Memorandum of Compromise filed to the said effect, the marriage between the parties shall stand dissolved. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed in terms of the Memorandums of Compromise and there shall be a decree in terms of the said Memorandum of Compromise and consequently, H.M.O.P.No.22 of 2000 stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. A copy of the Memorandum of Compromise shall be annexed to this judgment, which shall form part of this judgment. ______________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J _______________________ G.BHAVANI PRASAD, J 29th December, 2009 SKM