THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.9963 of 2006 Between: Laik Ali Khan. .. PETITIONER and The Station House Officer, P.S.Nacharam and others. .. RESPONDENTS ORDER: The petitioner seeks to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not extending police aid to the petitioner for implementation of the status-quo order granted in I.A.No.22 of 2006 in L.G.C.No.4 of 2006, dated 06-01-2006 on the file of Special Court under A.P.Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad (for short “the Land Grabbing Court”). It is stated that the Land Grabbing Court passed the order, dated 06-01-2006, directing both the parties to maintain status-quo until further orders with regard to the land admeasuring 7265 sq. yards out of total extent of Ac.1-25 guntas in Sy.Nos.218/5, 222/5 and 266/10 of Nacharam village, Kapra Municipality, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. If the petitioner is having any grievance with regard to the violation of status-quo order, it is always open for the petitioner to take appropriate steps to get it implemented by seeking appropriate directions in the aforesaid pending cases, as the concerned Court has got power to get it implemented. As a matter of fact, the petitioner has not made any application before the concerned Court for implementation of the said status-quo order. Therefore, without taking any recourse available to him, I am of the opinion that it is not just and proper for the petitioner to approach this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking police aid. No doubt, wherever the civil rights in respect of the immovable properties have been settled and if there is any interference, on making appropriate representations by the owner of the property, it is the duty of the police to protect the properties of the citizens. But, in the instant case, when a case is pending and the status-quo order has been obtained, it is open for the petitioner to get appropriate orders from the concerned Court for implementing the said status-quo order. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 09-03-2007 Prv