IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14744 of 2009 SANGITA KUMARI W/O VIJAI KUMAR PANDEY, VILL.- ABUL HASSANPUR, P.S. & DISTT.- VAISHALI............................................................................................Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR SANSKRIT SHIKSHA BOARD, PATNA. 3. THE EXAMINATION CONTROLLER, BIHAR SANSKRIT SHIKSHA BOARD, PATNA. 4. THE HEADMASTER, KRISHNADEO NIRANJAN DR. JAI NARAYAN SHARMA SANSKRIT HIGH SCHOOL, PATAHI, MUZAFFARPUR. 5. THE PRINCIPAL, RITLAL SURJIT YADAV COLLEGE, MUZAFFARPUR...Respondents. ----------- 02. 19.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It is the claim of the petitioner that she appeared at the Madhyama Examination in the year 2004 conducted by the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board as an independent candidate from the Krishnadeo Niranjan Dr. Jai Narayan Sharma Sanskrit High School, Patahi, Muzaffarpur. The Board after scrutiny of her papers issued an Admit Card giving her the registration no. 095411 of 2004, Roll Code No. 1505 and Roll No. 134. Her examination centre was at Ritlal Surjit Yadav College, Muzaffarpur. She passed in First Division when the Board also issued her a mark sheet on 09.07.2004. The school testified her being a passing student. The petitioner on that basis applied for the post of Angan Bari Sevika. After selection, her documents were sent for verification. The School confirmed the candidature of the petitioner. It is contended that the respondent-Board also sent a report to the effect that as per its report her Roll Code was 1505 and Roll No. 134 but the records show that she did not appear in 2 the examination. The report of the Board has not been made available to the petitioner. The petitioner has represented to the Secretary of the respondent Board on 07.09.2009 with no result. The writ application is disposed with direction to the Secretary of the respondent-Board to grant a personal hearing to the petitioner and examine any documents that she may produce in support of her claim. The Secretary is then required to furnish to the petitioner all such materials on which he proposes to deny the claim of the petitioner with an opportunity to the petitioner to meet the same. If the petitioner requests for any other document from the Board itself, the Secretary is obliged to call for it. Let the Secretary of the Board then pass a reasoned and speaking order with complete discussion of the claims of the petitioner and what transpired during the hearing before him inclusive of documents so that judicial review of his order be facilitated. Let the same be done maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. U.K. (Navin Sinha,J)