1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 277 OF 2011. Wasudeo Mahadeo Tejane .vs. The Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur & another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. R.M. Daruwala, Advocate (appointed) for petitioner, Mr. T.A. Mirza, A.P.P. for respondents. CORAM : MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATED : JUNE 9, 2011. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The petitioner had preferred an application for parole on the ground that his wife is sick. The said application came to be rejected by order dated 25.12.2010. The application came to be rejected on the ground that earlier on two occasions when the petitioner was released on parole, he absconded and did not report back to the prison in time. On one occasion, there was delay of 51 days in reporting back to the prison and on the second occasion, there was delay of 33 days in reporting back to the prison. Moreover, it is stated that the parole is sought 2 on the ground of illness of his wife. The police report shows that the petitioner’s family is residing with his brother. Therefore, it cannot be said that there is no one to look after the wife of the petitioner. Looking to all the above facts, we cannot find any error in the order rejecting the application for parole. Hence, the petition is rejected. The fees of the appointed Advocate are quantified at Rs.750/-. The fees to be paid within six months. Judge Judge J.