THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P.No. 5042 of 2011. ORDER: The 2nd appellant in A.S.No. 3 of 2008 on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Anakapalle has filed this revision under Article 2277 of the Constitution aggrieved by the order dt. 14.9.2011 rejecting I.A.No. 665 of 2010 filed under Order 26 Rule 10-A C.P.C., to send Ex:A.1 allegedly containing the petitioner’s thumb impression for comparison with his admitted thumb impression for scientific opinion and receiving the same as additional evidence in the appeal. O.S.No. 98 of 2002 was filed by the respondent for recovery of the suit amount on the basis of Ex:A.1 promissory note. The trial court decreed the suit. A.S.No. 3 of 2008 was filed against the Judgement and Decree of the trial court in August 2010. Two years after the appeal was filed, the revision petitioner filed the application for sending the suit promissory note for comparison with his admitted thumb impression. The court below rejected the application on the ground that the application is belated; that the petitioner/2nd appellant had ample opportunity in the trial court for sending the documents for forensic opinion; and that no such steps were taken even soon after the appeal was filed and at this belated stage, the application appears to be a stratagem to procrastinate the appeal. This Court discerns no error in the application of law or exercise of discretion warranting interference under Article 227 of the Constitution. The revision is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 09.12.2011. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P.No. 5042 of 2011. ORDER: Dt. 09.12.2011.