IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3655 of 2010 SATISH SINGH SON OF LATE SUKHDEO SINGH, R/O VILLAGE- KHOJAGACHHI, P.S.- BARBIGHA, DISTRICT- SHEIKHPURA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 7 18/08/2010 Heard Mr. Shakeel Ahmad Khan the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 11.8.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 23281 of 2009. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail and it has been submitted that he is in custody since 25.3.2009 and there is no explanation as to why for an occurrence dated 18.10.2009 fard beyan was given after death of the victim on 29.10.2009. It has also been submitted that initially the injured was brought to the PMCH and it was reported that it is a case of road traffic accident. On that date condition of the patient was noted and he has been found to be conscious and cooperative, still the matter was not reported and only after death the fard beyan was recorded. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant submits that the informant was not in a fit state so the fard beyan was not given. He further 2 submits that it was the fault of the Barbigha Police who has not registered the FIR though information was given to the police regarding the occurrence. Considering the delay in between the fard beyan and occurrence which is of 11 days, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M./concerned Court, Sheikhpura in connection with Barbigha P.S. Case No. 120 of 2007. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)