IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 10860 of 2009(B) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- K.M.RIYAAZ, 23 YEARS, S/O.MOHAMMED IBRAHIM, KALATHIL VEEDU, MANAPPADAM, PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER AND FATHER SHRI MOHAMMED IBRAHIM IN THE ABOVE ADDRESS. BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. PUDUKKODE GRAMA PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PUDUKKODE, PALAKKAD. 2. THE SECRETARY, PUDUKKODE GRAMA PANCHAYAT PUDUKKODE. 3. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, LOCAL SELF GOVT.DEPARTMENT, PUDUKKODE PANCHAYAT, PUDUKKODE, PALAKKAD. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH BABU R3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.RAMESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 10860 of 2009-B - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of November, 2010. JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the second respondent that the petitioner has raised certain allegations in the writ petition, which have been answered in the counter affidavit. Since the writ petition has become infructuous, I am not considering the veracity of the allegations raised by the petitioner. The writ petition is dismissed as infrucutous. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/