IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2011 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 9324 of 2011(M) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- THE MANAGER, MALABAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, PALLUR P.O., WADAKKANCHERRY VIA., CHERUTHURUTHY, THRISSUR - 679532. BY ADV. SRI.KURIAN GEORGE KANNANTHANAM, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.TONY GEORGE KANNANTHANAM SRI.JIJI THOMAS SRI.MATHEW K. SIMON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENJIPPALAM, MALAPPURAM DIST - 673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJIPPALAM, MALAPPURAM DIST - 673 635. 3. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM - 01. BY SC SRI.P.C SASIDHARAN FOR R1 AND R2 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ------------------------- W.P (C) No. 9324 of 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 24th March, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers: (i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to pass urgent orders on Ext.P4. ii.) to issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate order or direction to quash Ext.P3 in so far as it says that candidates should also have qualified in the State level entrance test to be eligible for admission for B.Tech. iii) to issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate order or direction to direct the 1st respondent to publish the results of the students covered by Ext.P1, of their first exams" 2. When the matter is taken up today for consideration, Adv. Mr. Kurian George Kannanthanam, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P4 representation before the Vice Chancellor of Calicut University for redressal of their grievance and petitioner will be satisfied, if a direction is given to the respondents W.P (C) No. 9324 of 2011 2 to consider Ext.P4 representation. 3. Heard the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent University as well, who submits that, the matter requires to be considered by the Synidicate and it will take some time, especially in view of the fact that meeting of the Syndicate has to be convened as presented. In the said circumstances, the respondent University is directed to cause Ext.P4 representation of the petitioner to be considered by the competent Authority and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE ma /True copy/ P.A to Judge