V. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 2715 OF 2009 : Ratanlal Vidhani VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofCbhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. "Present: Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for the petitioner. PETITIONER Shri Shashank Thalmn Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent N0. l. Shri H.B.Agrawa1, Senior'Advoeate with Ms. Itu Rani Das, Advocaie for the respondent No. 2, 3 & 4. Shri B.P.Sharma, Advocate the respondent No.5 & 6. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 14 day of July, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that impugwd letter dated 13/5/2009 has been issued without aLEfording any opportunity ,of hearing to the petitioner under provisions of Section 309 & 310 of the Municipal Corporation Act, 1956. 2. Per contra, Shri Agrawal, learned senior counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation submits that the impugned letter dated 13/5/2009 is not a final order but it is a notice of status of the building, which is appealable under the provisions of Section 309(7) & 403 of the Municipal Corporation Act, 1956. Shri Ag‘awal further sul§mits that even in the return, it has been clearly stated that it is only the status report, not the final orderas submitted before the Sub Divisional Magistrate, and as such no action would be taken on the basis of impugned communication dated 13/5/2009 without passing the proper order. 3. 1n view of the foregoing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse of statutory appellate forum as provided under provisions of law. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri 1 Judge Ashok