IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH JULY 2010 / 16TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 7429 of 2010(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- RAVINDRA VIKRAMAN NAIR, RESIDING AT PALAZHI, MENADU, PUZHANADU P.O., OTTASEKHARAMANGALAM VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEWS J.NEDUMPARA SRI.VADAKARA V.V.N.MENON RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, FEDERAL BANK LIMITED, KALLIKADU BRANCH, KALLEKADU, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK. 2. THE FEDERAL BANK LTD., KALLIKADU BRANCH, KALLEKADU, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. 3. THE FEDERAL BANK LIMITED, REGISTERED/HEAD OFFICE, FEDERAL TOWERS, POST BOX NO.103, ALUVA, KERALA STATE, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR. 4. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF BANKING, JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI. WP(C).No. 7429 of 2010(C) 5. T.VIJAYARAJ, PRESENTLY WORKING AS COMMANDANT, A.R.CAMP, RAMAPURAM, TRISSUR, PERMANENTLY RESIDING AT MERCY BHAVAN, VEERANAKKAVU, VEERANAKAVU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 6. I.SUSHAMA, RETIRED PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF PHYLOSOPHY, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, RESIDING AT 524, P.T.CHACKO NAGAR, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., ULLOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE (MANACHIRACKEL) AND BY ADV. SRI.K.J. CHACKOCHAN R6 BY ADV. SRI.R.S.KALKURA SRI.M.S.KALESH SRI.V.VINAY MENON SRI.M.AJAY (IRUMPANAM) SMT.KVP.JAYALEKSHMY SMT.A.V.PRIYA R7 BY ADV. SAIGI JACOB PALATTY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.( C) No. 7429 OF 2010 ......................................................................... Dated this the 7th July, 2010 J U D G M E N T There was no representation for the petitioner, when the matter was taken up for consideration on 02.07.2010. Today also there is no exception. It appears that the petitioner is no more interested in the cause of action projected in the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is dismissed for default. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk