IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26193 of 2010 NIRAJ SINGH S/O MITHILESH SINGH R/O VILLAGE PUNESHRA P.S. JAI RAMPUR MORE, DISTRICT- SHEIKHPURA. --PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP PARTY 2 01.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named accused in this case, being husband of the informant, carries allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. It appears from the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge that there was some negotiation between the parties but could not be materialized. However, petitioner, as submitted, is still ready and willing to resume marital life with the informant with all due dignity and honour. In order to show that his intention is bonafide the petitioner offered to pay a sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred) per month by way of ad-interim maintenance to the informant subject to order of the competent authority on this point. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and filing petition supported with affidavit 2 before the court below stating his intention and deposit of the amount, as offered, the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura, in Jairampur P.S. Case no. 7 of 2010 subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present on three dates before the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation or causes single default in payment the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad