IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.581 of 2009 1. Mahanth Ram, Shobha Das, Chela Mahanth Lakhpati Das. 2. Suryabansh Choubey, son of late Gayatri Choubey. Both residents of Village- Chhoti Mathia, Ramrekha Ghat, P.S.- Buxar (Town), District- Buxar. …….Judgement-Debtor……Petitioners. Versus 1. Sheshnath Pandey, Advocate, son of late Raj narayan Pandey, resident of Village- Sewarai, Post- Sewrai, P.S.- Gahmar, District- Ghazipur, at present- Chhoti Mathia, Ramrekha Ghat, P.S.- Buxar (Town), District- Buxar. 2. Kala Chaturvedi, wife of late Ramashankar Choubey. 3. Pappu Choubey, son of late Ramashankar Choubey. Both residents of Village-Chhoti Mathia, Ramrekha Ghat, P.S.- Buxar (Town), District- Buxar. ----------- 03- 25.11.2011 None appears on behalf of the petitioners. Heard Mr. Jitendra Kishore Verma for opposite party no.1. The judgment-debtors of Execution Case No.3 of 2008, have preferred this civil revision application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and are aggrieved by the order dated 19.3.2009, whereby the warrant of arrest has been issued against them as well as the opposite party 2nd set. 2. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for opposite party no.1 (the decree-holder). It appears to us from the order-sheet on record that the judgment debtors were arrested and produced before the court on 2 26.3.2009, as a result of which the impugned order has spent its force. It is evident that this civil revision application has become infructuous. It is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/