Thakur ® 1N ”111EH lQidi QQHRJI,Q£.Q!itl§ll1‘l§$§&ili5JIU1A§BQL< Wnt B§QQQQ .,1."{9;W2.9.lV9_9129£1Z Petiiioner Versus Respondents 1. (Chhattisgarh) IL)“; Arun Kumar 85 Company, Proprietor, Arun Kumar Ruprela, aged 34 ysars, son of Shri Meghraj Ruprela, near Chhoti Line, Phafadih, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Stats of Cnhattisgath through Principal Sscretaxy, Dopartmsnt of Minss; and. Minerals, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) ~ Director, Geology and'Mining, Directorate of Geology and Mining Ring Road No. 1, village Emma, Raipur, C.G. Collector, Durg, District — Burg Ramchand Pritwani, son of Shrivandas Pxitwazli, age 37 yeam, resident of Shankar Nagar, Raipur, Chhatt‘isgarh. ”w;1g1;(j__ggggr1'1‘0N UNDER Awncw 226/227 op THE “(‘“TQ’I‘ITUTIQN OF Il‘m” w“ (SB: Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotn‘ d. ) 8hr: Ashok Son}, Advocate for the pennonez Shn' Vivek Shanna, Panel Lawyer for the respondents No.1 to 3. Shn' Surm't Verma, Advocate for the respondent No.4. ORDEK (Passed on this 29th day of September, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the pentioner, on instructions, submits that with the passage of time this petition has become innuctuous. Learned counsel appealing‘for the respondents] State has no objection. In View of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as having become inir‘uctuous. 1678/ 2002 is also dismissed. Consequently, M(W)P No. / /ga/ii sat Jud9¢ ssh K. A9““‘°“i " "Mm