IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 601 OF 2010 MR. NILESH KRISHNA VAIGANKAR AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF GOA AND 5 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Nigel Da Costa Frias, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. V. Rodrigues, Addl. Government Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Sr. Advocate with Mr. H. D. Naik for Respondent No. 3. Coram:- D. G. KARNIK & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 14th September, 2010 P.C. By this petition the petitioner challenges the decision of the respondent No. 3 for selection of respondent No. 5 to the post of Assistant Agriculture Officer. 2. An advertisement was issued for filling of 12 posts of Assistant Agriculture Officers and two of the posts were reserved for Scheduled Tribes. There were also some other reservations. The petitioner No. 1 applied for the post of Assistant Agriculture Officer which was reserved for other backward class category and petitioner No. 2 applied for open general category. 3. None of the petitioners had applied for the post under the Scheduled Tribes category. Respondent No. 5 had applied for the post under the Scheduled Tribes category. 4. The petitioners in any event are not entitled to be appointed in the said post as the post is reserved for Scheduled Tribes and none of the petitioners had applied for the post under the Scheduled Tribes category. 5. Consequently, we decline to interfere in the matter and the petition is disposed of. D. G. KARNIK, J. F. M. REIS, J. MF/-