IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2009 / 8TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 13116 of 2009(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. WAJID KOYALI P.,S/O.P.KOYALI, AGED 22 YEARS,RESIDING AT PERINCHERI HOUSE, PARAKKAL,KANMANAM POST,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. MOHAMMED RAMIS KUNHAMED, AGED 22 YEARS,S/O.KUNHAMED, KAZHUNGHIL HOUSE,P.O.EDARIKODE, VIA,PARAMBILANGADI,KOTTAKKAL, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O.,THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O.,THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY SC SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).13116/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 29th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioners were the students of MES College of Engineering, Kuttippuram, for B.Tech Degree Course. Apparently, dissatisfied with the marks obtained by the 1st petitioner in two papers and by the 2nd petitioner in one paper in the 6th semester supplementary examination, they had applied for revaluation. They are aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the 6th semester B.Tech supplementary Examination. Exts.P1 and P2 applications for revaluation are pending before the respondents. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to publish the results of the W.P.(C).13116/2009 2 revaluation sought for by the petitioners, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the applications for revaluation are in order and otherwise correct. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs