IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION NO.^o €,6 OF 2004 fe iltehEwih, PETITIONER Dr.L.K.Choubey, S/o Late Tilak Prasad , Aged about 58 years Occupation Ayurvedic Medical Officer JSovemment '•} : ^l' ^•<<> -? ) .......•Ayurvedic Pharmacy,Raipur (C.G. .^s-^^^^ ^•::^,^-'P^I^--^ .^^^••Y^^ ,..''1 RESPONDENTS ^"^: '^^ •~X3 "€.•'.l .^ ^,^ VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Secretary Health and Family Welfare Department D.K.S. Building Raipur (C.G.) Directorate Jndian Medical Allo- Pafhy And Homeopathy Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). \-.» WRIT PETITION U/S 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA M +. 131^1 W:,RaJ4i Wsn^i<!t>; t4" *i)*«nrtR»ira» 'S^t -t)<•]IW^,. JE9Tll<Lf 1S;f fal'tl 1*1 y,< ,4A(^fc;.. "IF^^OQ^ i3II^?T1:PW('^!f^^[) ?WliW;^f^tll •SRT^T 24.1.2005: . Shri S.S. Mishra counsel fon l-1eard. The petitioner who is an A^ Ayun/ed Pharmacy, Raipu.r hasfil P-2 by which he has been transf^ administrative ground. Learhed coynsel for the pet|- has been passed malafidely agair) 2006. l-1efurther submittedthat a s[ to ,the petitioner on some vague| petitioner as per annexure P-4. H^ inquiry the petitioner has been pur|i sen/ioe career. He further submitted pursuance of anhexure P-2 but stjl Ayuwed Phamnaey, Raipur vide relievingtill furtherpFders. - Let ttle pefitioner file copi Govemment Ayurved Pharmacy, R; •Leamed eounsel|1br the pe served if the petjtjcneriis allowej respdndents against the on3®Fofar within a stipulatedpenodt l^i .1-1- ^T*lfci^1l*SlHlcii iSf Ts*<0 ^'^ROTSTt^T the petitioner. rurved Medical Cfficer posted in .Government 3d this petjtion against the order of annexure •red to Govt. Ayurved Pharmacy Parsada on tionersubmitsthattheaboveorderoftransfer st the petitioner who istoretireinFebruary -low. oause notice of annexure .P-3 was issued allegations which was dyly replied by the )wever, withoyt conducting any departmental ished byway oftransfer at the fag end of his that earlieF the petitioner-was relieved ih bsequently the Depyty Director, Governmeht 3Fder dated 3.12.2004 stayed the order 6f ;of .order dated 3:12.2004 passed by fthe aipurduring the'courseiofthe day. Ejfioner suBnnits that eridslofjustice'iwoujct|t^^ 1 ^tQ make/.a. detajled 1 represen|atioHi]tq| in©<ureP-2tb'bedecaedbytherespoj!id| hl:1^! IIM iti i w 's^-^ XI-HC—78 W(t;'ii=ti ^ETf|^H^?T'^Nr ••l'°: ~s^"<iwfvw, e'fll'tf'is, ftyti+ill,< 1£€;..^^^(?.^........,- SIT^T'q^'C' 'TOnwBftaaiitsT After hearing counsel for shall make a dgtailed represent^tion annexure P-2 within 10 days from representation being made to th^ them within.a psriodtofsixweeks Ijhe petitioner; it is directed that the petrtioner -9 . • . - • .'•.'. '• ,'''..•: to the respondents against theorder of todayaiong with-the copy.ofthis order. On that respondents, the same shall be decided by t[iere from by adetailed and rsasoned drder. MeanwNle, the^ respondents annexure R-2 if the petitii^ner With these observations thj In view of^this order MWR disposed sf. :<»tit<{ewliHmcS^ eS tf"lgj< ; ^afftifsliH . shall not give effect to the transferjorder of has not been relieved so far. petitionisdisposedof'. . ; NQ. 5294/2004 and [A No. 9955/2004 stand Sd/-- DHIRENDRA MBHRA