IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46841 of 2008 1. JHAGRU SINGH 2. Nagendra Singh 3. Satyendra Kumar Singh Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 13.4.2009 Heard both sides. The petitioners who are father-in-law, elder brother-in-law and younger brother-in-law (Dewar) have approached this Court for grant of anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the police after conclusion of investigation did not submit charge sheet against the present petitioners. However, the Court below has taken cognizance against them also under Sections 306/498A of the I.P.C. This Court finds from the impugned order that some of the witnesses have stated about the complicity of the petitioners in course of investigation. Counsel for the petitioners also questioned the postmortem report stating that the doctor found ligature mark post mortem in nature. Be that as it may, this Court is not inclined to extend the petitioners the privilege of anticipatory bail. It would be open for them to apply for regular bail and place all the facts before the said Court which will be considered in accordance with law. With this observation, the application is dismissed. P. Kumar (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)