IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.1252 of 2007 Sunita Srivastava Versus Kameshwar Prasad ---------------------------------- 6 22-11-2011 Mr. Shankar Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that by the impugned order an order has been passed directing the petitioner to hand over custody of the minor child to the opposite party and he has further submitted that a matrimonial case is still pending. He has prayed for permission to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution as the impugned order is interlocutory in nature. The prayer is allowed. Four weeks’ time is allowed to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution, failing which the revision application shall stand rejected without further reference to the bench. roy ( V. Nath, J.)