WP(C) 3921/2008 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K.SHARMA Heard Mr. D.C. Mahanta, learned S. Counsel, assisted by Mr. D.K. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner. I have also heard Mr. R. Chakrabort y, learned Additional Sr. Govt. Advocate, Assam. In view of the facts and circumstances involved in the case, ser vice of notice on the respondent No. 5 stands dispensed with. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Sonitpur Zilla Paris had, Tezpur while issuing NIT dated 8.8.2008 has excluded the market called Lokr a Weekly Market from the purview of the NIT. According to the petitioner, such a course has been adopted in view of the pendency of the writ petition being WP(C ) No. 2665/2008. The writ petition has been filed by the respondent No. 5 prayin g for extension/remission of revenue in respect of the said market. The period o f lease in favour of the respondent No. 5 is already over and there is also no i nterim order passed by this Court in the said writ petition. In view of the above, pendency of the writ petition cannot be th e ground for omission of Lokra Weekly Market from the purview of the NIT. In the NIT all other markets have been included fixing the last date of receipt of ten ders as 19.9.2008. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Sonitpur Zi lla Parishad, Tezpur to incorporate the said market in the NIT dated 8.8.2008 or to issue independent NIT for the said market. It will be in the interest of Gov ernment revenue to settle the market through tender system. Writ petition is disposed of.