IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 6025/2008 Decided on:23.7.2010 _____________________________________________ Pankaj Saklani. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. ______________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. Advocate General. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). It is jointly represented by the learned counsel for the parties that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP(T) No. 6008/2008, tilted Daulat Ram Thakur versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, decided on 16.6.2010. Accordingly the petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment to the post of D.P.E. on the basis of interview held on 3.5.1999 with 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 all the consequential benefits within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 23.7.2010 *awasthi*