1 GPN-J.332-ARCHB-8.94-1310500-ALA4 Spl-H.C.A.S.C.D.79e FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3791 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 3791 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 3791 OF 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office ) Memoranda of Coram, ) appearances, Court’s ) Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions ) and Registrar’s orders.) ------------------------------------------------------------ Mr. S.M. Gorwadkar for Petitioner. Mr. V.N. Shingarpurkar for Respondent No. 2. Ms. S.J. Gore with Mr. D.N. Salvi and S.S. Sarkar for Respondent No. 3. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY,JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 18, 2005 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. . Considering the arguments advanced, at the Bar, petition can be disposed of. . Respondent No. 1 state that they have no difficulty in providing the information which the petitioners to the extent the respondent No. 1 can make available. It is however, pointed out that the Petitioners are seeking information not in the manner in which Respondent No. 1 can 2 give them but on a hard disk. In the system as presently operated by Respondent No. 1, it is not possible to give the information on hard disk. However, Petitioners can discuss with CMC, their maintenance Contractor, which is a Government Company and it is open to the Petitioners to fix the terms under which the information can be given. B.S.E. would have no objection to any terms that the petitioner and CMC may arrive at for the purpose of giving such information. . The statements made on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 by their learned counsel accepted. Petition disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs. (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (S.P.KUKDAY,J.)