HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR KN WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 2981 0f2008 Dev Kumar, aged about 32 i, Post Jawg’DiStrict Rewa Arun Kumar. Diwedi S/o yam, R/o Viliage Baron} (M1).) PETITIONER VERSUS . Koikata Chairman, (W.B.) Coal India _ Ltd. 10. Netaji Subhash . Road, ,2. Director (P. & IR) Coal India Ltd, Subhash Road, Kolkata (W.B,) 3. Coal Member Industry), Secretaxy, Coal JBCC—VI India Ltd. (Joint 10, Bipartite Netaji Subhash for the} _,V Road, Kolkata (W.B.)V ‘ 4. Chaman-cum-Managing Director, S.E.C.L. Head 5. District Chief Quarter, General Surguja Seepat Manager, Road, (C.G.) Bilaspur S.E.C.L. i (C.G.) Area : ishrampur, V ;', _ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CON TTI‘UTION QF INDIA ’ble Sh ' ‘ ’ a“ RESPONDENTS 10 Netaji S ho ' J atishKA ni ; Shri F.S.Khare, Advocate for thepetitioner.‘ ‘ Present: Praveen Shri Vivek Das, Shrivastava, Advocate for Advocate the respondent appearing No. on 4 behalf and 5. ofShri e ORAL ORDER (Passed on 16 day of June, 2008) L 2. l. With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up for-hearingtinally. _ similarly situated to that ofthe respondents in the matter ofChamnanaCentral Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner Coabfelds Ltd. & Others Kr. Jivendra Prasad Tiwari & Others (Civil Appeal No. 1 714 of2007). Lgamed ‘counsei further submits that the said Civii Appeal has been disposed of vide order dated 29"“ March, 2007, passed by the Hon’ble V Supreme Court of India. Learned counsel further submits that this case may ‘ also be disposed of in the same terms. There is no opposition bylearned counsel for the respondents. submits that the petitioner‘ is . In view of the above, the petition stands di order asto costs. V {a i sposed of in the same terms. No 1 ‘ “ ; Sd/— { Satish K. Agnihotri‘y I Judge jar. V SB: Hon ri :