IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16994 of 2007 INDU KUMARI, wife of Sri Naresh Prasad, resident of village Bhola Kurha South, P.S. Sirdala, District Nawada … Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Director, Department of Social Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The District Magistrate, Nawada 4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Nawada 5. The District Welfare Officer, Nawada 6. The Child Development Project Officer, Sirdalla, Nawada 7. The Block Development Officer, Sirdalla, District Nawada 8. The Mukhiya, Sandh Manjhgawan Panchayat, Sirdalla Block, District Nawada 9. Kumari Manju, wife of Sri Arun Kumar, resident of village Bhola Kurha, P.S. Sirdalla, District Nawada … Respondents. ----------- 2. 18.12.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows: “A. For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent concerned to appoint the petitioner as Anganbari Sevika for serving Bhola Kurha Anganbari Kendra which falls in the Sirdalla Block of the Nawada district. B. For issuance of a writ of certiorari canceling the appointment of the private respondent forthwith and during the pendency of this writ application her allowances may be directed to stop.” 2 Surendra/ With reference to the aforementioned relief, counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner intends to move the Collector of the District by filing a compact representation. In the opinion of this Court, recourse chosen by the petitioner seems to be correct inasmuch as the scheme for appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika itself envisages the redressal of grievance pertaining to selection/ appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika in the first instance by the Collector of the District. That being so, this Court would give liberty to the petitioner to file a compact representation which, if filed alongwith this order, will be disposed of within the time limit fixed by the State Government in the circular dated 10.12.2009 by a reasoned order after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, respondent no.9 and the representative of concerned Gram Panchayat. With the aforementioned observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) 3