1 cra110 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.110 OF 2004 Gangubai Bhaidas Landge ...Applicant vs. Prakash Soma Kachre & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.M.S.Karnik for the applicant Mr.S.H.Joshi for the respondent no.1 CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : FEBRUARY 25,2011 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the revision applicant. On instructions of the revision applicant, he seeks permission to withdraw this revision application with liberty to file appropriate proceedings for establishing her legal rights. He states that the amount has not been disbursed on the basis of the succession certificate granted under the impugned order. He prays for a limited protection to enable him to file appropriate proceedings. Hence, civil revision application is dismissed with liberty as prayed. 2 The learned counsel for respondent no.1 opposes the request for granting protection. 3 However, it is not disputed that the first respondent has not withdrawn the amount payable towards the service benefits of deceased Surekha till today. Hence, civil revision application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. 4 The first respondent shall not act upon succession certificate granted in his favour for a period of eight 2 cra110 weeks from today. 5 It is made clear that any proceedings which may be filed by the revision applicant and interim application made therein shall be decided on its own merits without being influenced by the limited protection granted by this Court. It is obvious that all contentions of the parties in the proceedings which may be filed by the revision applicant are kept open. 6 Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. JUDGE