THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4764 OF 2009 ORDER: The petitioner filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking to assail the correctness of the order dated 01.08.2009 passed in I.A.No.301 of 2009 in O.S.No.273 of 1999 on the file of the VIII Additional Senior Civil Judge (FTC), City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in partly allowing the petition filed under Order VIII Rule 1A (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to grant leave to file the documents as per the list and to receive the same. The Court below partly allowed the said petition for receipt of documents numbering 28 to 33, subject to admissibility, proof and relevancy and insofar as documents numbering 1 to 27, the petition was dismissed. Hence, the revision. It is now well established that in an application of this nature, any document which is filed and ultimately, to be received by the Court will always be subject to proof, admissibility and relevancy. Therefore, while considering the application at this stage, the question of proof, admissibility and relevancy does not arise. It is only as and when the petitioner substantiates his claim by proof, admissibility and relevancy, then only all documents would be necessarily admitted and marked. In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the order dated 01.08.2009 in I.A.No.301 of 2009 rejecting receipt of documents 1 to 27 is set aside and I.A.No.301 of 2009 stands allowed in its entirety. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 11th March 2011 RRB