IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6477 of 2009 Date of Decision: November 09 , 2009 Gobind Ram and another ...... Petitioners Versus Km. Karishma (Minor) etc.through their mothers and other ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. **** Ajay Tewari, J. This revision has been filed against the order impleading respondent No.4 as defendant No.3 in the suit. The trial court allowed the application since the original plaintiffs did not oppose the same. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that actually the respondent No.4 w2as not at all a necessary or proper party and that in fact this whole exercise is because of collusion between respondents No.1, 2, 3 (the original plaintiffs) and respondent No.4. In my opinion the interest of the petitioner can be actually safeguarded by permitting him to amend his written statement to take up a plea of mis-joinder in case so advised. Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE November , 2009 sunita