C.W.P. No.17681 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 04.10.2008 Rajwant Kaur and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH. HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY. Present : Mr.K.K.Garg, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- UMA NATH SINGH, J. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that in terms of liberty granted by Hon'ble the Apex Court vide order dated 21.11.2001, in Civil Appeal Nos.4904-4905 of 1991 and Writ Petition (Civil) Nos.248, 244 and 345 of 2001, he has made a representation to the State Government. Relevant portion of the order dated 21.11.2001, on reproduction, reads as under: “xx xx xx xx A grievance was made in some of the cases that in the interregnum, on the land in question substantial constructions have been put up. Following the observations made by this Court in three Judges Bench dated 23.8.1990, we also observe that it would be open for the respondents to approach the State Government to grant such relief as may be permissible in law in view of the fact that they have put up certain substantial constructions on the land in question. xx xx xx xx.” C.W.P. No.17681 of 2008 2 Learned counsel submitted that the petitioners would be satisfied if their pending representation, Annexure P-7, is directed to be disposed of in the light of the observations made in the said order of Hon'ble the Apex Court, within a time frame, on merits. We do not find any legal impediment in issuing such direction, which is only in terms of the observations of Hon'ble the Apex Court. Accordingly, this writ petition No.17681 of 2008 is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to decide and dispose of the pending representation, Annexure P-7, in the light of the observations made in the said order of Hon'ble the Apex Court within a period of two months from the date of receiving a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. However, status- quo as on today, be maintained till the disposal of the representation. (UMA NATH SINGH) JUDGE 04 -10-2008 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) *mohinder JUDGE Whether this judgment be referred to Reporter or not? YES/NO