IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.1538 of 2010 (O & M) Date of Decision: July 04, 2011 Chitresh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. N.D. Achint, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. On perusal of judgment dated 8.12.2008, it transpires that material prosecution witnesses did not support the prosecution case. Crl. Revision No.1538 of 2010 [2] 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has not been able to point out any illegality in the judgment of acquittal. It has not been shown to the Court that any piece of evidence has been perversely read or a material piece of evidence has not been considered by the Trial Court while adjudicating. In these circumstances, this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of acquittal passed by the Special Court, Gurgaon. 3. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) July 04, 2011 JUDGE avin