FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1017 OF 2010 (Vikas s/o Maruti Pansare Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Shri V.H. Thorat, Advocate holding for Shri A.B. Kale, Advocate for petitioner Shri K.M. Suryawanshi, A.P.P. for State Shri S.S. Jadhavar, Advocate for respondent No.4. ... CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 17th February, 2011 1. After arguing extensively, the learned counsel, on instructions, withdraws the criminal writ petition to enable to adopt appropriate proceedings after the charge sheet. Permitted to withdraw. Criminal Writ Petition disposed of. 2. The investigator/ State will ensure expeditious filing of charge sheet as investigation is over, only wanting for sanction, the sanctioning authority will look into this aspect and resort to the grievance of the petitioner that matter is unnecessarily dragged by either the investigator or the State Authorities. 3. Interim relief does not survive due to withdrawal of present proceedings. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE fmp/cri705.11