IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 23RD JANUARY 2009 / 3RD MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 2552 of 2009(D) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SUBRAHMANIAN.K., S/O.KRISHNAN, SUB REGISTRAR(RETIRED) DEEPTHI, PARAMMEL PO., AZHINILAM, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY REGISTERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) MALAPPURAM. 4. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL(A&E) KRERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY G.P. SHRI P. NANDAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 2552 of 2009-D - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of January, 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioner has retired from service on 31.8.2005. As per Ext.P1, the retirement benefits due to him have been sanctioned by the second respondent. Out of this, an amount of Rs.1,37,969/- has been sanctioned towards DCRG. Ext.P1(a) is the revised order after granting benefits due towards revision of pay and allowances. The apparent complaint raised by the petitioner is that liability to the tune of Rs.1,24,644/- has been shown in Ext.P2. 2. Again, by Ext.P3 it was informed that there is a further liability of Rs.59,260/- making the total liability to Rs.2,37,620/-. 3. Aggrieved by the fixation of liability, the petitioner has submitted Exts.P5 to P7 which respectively relates to serial Nos.3, 5 and 7 in Ext.P4. The second respondent has been requested to consider the objection and pass appropriate orders. 4. Heard learned Govt. Pleader also. 5. Since the above representations are pending consideration, there will be a direction to the second respondent to consider Exts.P5 to P7 and WPC 2552/2009 2 pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/