IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 14TH MARCH 2008 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1929 RP.No. 327 of 2008(F) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.32813/2007 Dated 07/02/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C): -------------------------------------------------- SHAJI, S/O. LATE ABRAHAM, THAKIDIYIL HOUSE, VADAVATHOOR KARA AND POST, VIJAYAPURAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.KURUVILLA JACOB RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS IN WP(C): ----------------------------------------------- 1. MATHEW ALIAS BABY, S/O. MATHAN, MANJACKAL HOUSE, CHERUVALLY KARA AND VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. RAGHAVAN NAIR, S/O.RAMAN NAIR, CHOORAPPADIYIL HOUSE, CHERUVALLY KARA AND VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV.SHRI V.R.K.KAIMAL THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J. -------------------------- R.P. NO. 327 OF 2008 --------------------- Dated this the 14th day of March, 2008 ORDER This review petition is filed against the order passed by me in WP(C) No.32813/07. Heard both sides. It is submitted that as per Sec.15(2) of the Kerala Civil Courts Act “No District Judge or Subordinate Judge shall hear any appeal against a decree or order passed by himself.”. 2. I have considered that point in para 2 of my judgment and I did not want to further give my reasoning for the reason that some transfer applications are pending before the District court. So my view has been expressed and it is not a thing which can be challenged under Order XLVII of the Civil Procedure Code. If the party is aggrieved he has to choose the appropriate forum for rectifying the same. The review petition lacks merit and it is accordingly dismissed. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE vps