IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10843 of 2010 RAM UDGAR YADAV, S/o Jugul Lal Yadav, R/o Village-Hataha, P.S.-Bahera, District-Darbhanga. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Most. Manjula Devi, W/o Late Sitaram Yadav, R/o Village-Mohiuddinpur Pakri, P.S.-Bahera, District-Darbhanga. ----------- 02. 07.12.2010 The petitioners has sought quashing of the order dated 11.02.2010 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Darbhanga in Cr. Rev. No. 296 of 2007 by which he has affirmed the order dated 28.06.2007 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Bahera P.S. Case No. 174 of 2006. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the order of cognizance the ACJM has considered the protest petition therefore the order of cognizance is bad. However, on going through the impugned order, I find that he has applied his judicial mind to the facts of the case and, therefore, this can not be the sole ground for setting aside the order. The application is dismissed. The District & Sessions Judge, Darbhanga is directed to ensure that no criminal revisions are kept pending for long periods since in the present case I find that even though the revision was filed in the year 2007 final orders were passed in the year 2010 only delaying the trial unnecessarily. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)