IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14400 of 2008 CHOUDHARY TRIVENI RAI & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners, namely, Choudhary Triveni Rai, Choudhary Lalan Rai @ Lalan Rai, Prabhu Narayan Rai, Sumitra Devi @ Sunita Devi and Laldai Devi, stand implicated in Bahera P.S. Case No. 79 of 2007 registered under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioners who happen to be Dewars and Gotanis of the deceased have been wrongly roped in the case. The informant filed protest petitioner before the I.O. but subsequently his statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. coupled with the petition filed on behalf of father of the deceased revealed that deceased died due to vomiting and diarrhea. This fact was favourably considered for granting bail to co-accused Choudhary Nageshwar Roy @ Choudhary Nagendra Roy, who happens to be the husband of petitioner no. 5 (Laldai Devi). The order dated 18.12.2007 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 38841 of 2007 supports such contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Heard learned A.P.P. for the State. In the facts and circumstances, the petitioners above named are admitted to bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Benipur, Darbhanga in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 79 of 2007. Sanjeet ( Subash Chandra Jha, J.)