IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 27TH OCTOBER 2009 / 5TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 25475 of 2009(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JAMEELA BEEVI.B., T.C.20/1222, KUNJALUMMOODU, KARAMANA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. WORKING AS CONTINGENT SANITARY WORKER HEALTH INSPECTOR OFFICE, CHENTHITTA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION. BY ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER SMT.M.JAYASREE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. MR.NANDAKUMARA MENON, SC FOR R1 MR.P.K.MANOJ KUMAR, SC FOR R1 MR.ANTONY MUKKATH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.25475/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 : COPY OF IDENTITY CARD ISSUED FORM EMPLOYEMNT EXCHANGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM IN THE YEAR 1980. P2 : COPY OF CALL LETTER NO.H6/H2/23118/01 DATED 11/1/2005 ISSUED BY THE HEALTH OFFICER OF R1 CORPORATION TO THE PETITIONER. P3 : COPY OF ORDER NO.H6/H2/23118/01 DATED 24/1/2005 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT CORPORATION. P4 : COPY OF LETTER NO.H6/H2/23118/01 DATED 10/5/2005 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT CORPORATION TO THE PETITIONER. P5 : COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE R1 CORPORATION. P6 : COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE R2 DATED 14/6/2007. P6(a) : COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD ISSUED BY R2 DATED 15/6/2007. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE. jg ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.25475 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 27th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner submits that she is a contingent employee working under the 1st respondent Corporation. According to the petitioner, persons, who were engaged along with her, have already been regularised. It is stated that while so, she was issued Ext.P4 intimating that she is an excess hand, and is proposed to be terminated. Thereupon, she made Ext.P6 representation to the Minister for Local Self Government Department, and Ext.P6 representation has been forwarded to the 2nd respondent as per Ext.P6(a). Even on Ext.P6(a), orders have not been passed. It is in these circumstances, this writ petition is filed praying that she should also be regularised as a contingent sanitary worker. 2. At present, a final decision on the claim of the petitioner is yet to be taken. In view of this and having regard to the fact that Ext.P6 representation is pending consideration of the 2nd respondent, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders WP(C) No.25475/2009 -2- on Ext.P6. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg