IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA FRIDAY, THE 28TH MAY 2010 / 7TH JYAISHTA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 2549 of 2010() ----------------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED: -------------------------------------- P.A.VINAYACHANDRAN, PANAMTHOTTATHIL HOUSE, ATTACHAKKAL.P.O., KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI. SREEJITH S. NAIR RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. 2. THE S.I OF POLICE, POLICE STATION, THANITHODE, PATHANAMTHITTA. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. V. TEK CHAND THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sou. K. HEMA, J ---------------------- B.A.No.2549 OF 2010 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of May, 2010 O R D E R This petition is for anticipatory bail. 2. The alleged offence is u/s.420 IPC. According to prosecution, petitioner made false representation that he would obtain admission to the defacto complainant's son in an engineering college and persuaded defacto complainant to part with Rs.1,90,000/- on two occasions. But, petitioner cheated him by not acting as represented. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that there is a case under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and the present crime is registered after eleven months of the incident. Petitioner is prepared to abide by any condition. 4. This petition is opposed. Learned public prosecutor submitted that allegation against petitioner are serious in B.A. No.2549/10 2 nature. On hearing both sides, from the submissions made by petitioner's submissions which are recorded above defence of petitioner is not clear to me. Petitioner has not made out any ground to grant anticipatory bail. None of the relevant details are stated to decide discretionary relief can be extended to petitioner. This petition is dismissed. K. HEMA, JUDGE. Sou.