WP(C) 1582/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the select list da ted 11.2.2011 for the post of Excise Constable (Annexure- 8). In the select list there are 98 candidates. However, they are not party respondents to this procee ding except the respondent No.5. Heard Mr. R. Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. J. Patw ary, learned Standing Counsel assisting Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Addl. Advoca te General for the respondents. The only ground on which the writ petition has been filed challenging the said s elect list is that although the petitioner could answer all the questions put t o him in the viva voice examination but the candidates who could answer only two questions have been selected. In this connection he has named the respondent No . 5. According to the petitioner the said candidate had openly stated that he wo uld manage the selection and would get appointment. Apart from the fact that the selected candidates are not party respondents to th is proceeding, no relief can be granted to the petitioner on such vague statemen t. Better particulars will have to be disclosed towards challenging the selectio n. Under similar circumstances and pertaining to the same selection this Court h as already dismissed the writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 763/2011 Tinkumani Shar ma v. State of Assam by judgment and order dated 24.3.2011. In view of the above no relief can be granted to the petitioner and this writ pe tition stands dismissed.