BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Second day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16928 of 2011 PANDISELVI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.4 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUPPATHUR, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. CR NO. 3/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.RAGAVENTHREE, Representing for M/S. A.RAJ MOHAN Advocate For Respondent : K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 417, 376, 294(b), 506(ii) and 498(A) I.P.C., in Crime No.3 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Heard Mr.Ragaventhree, representing for A.Raj Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is the sister-in-law of the defacto complainant and she is no way connected in the alleged commission of offence. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the petitioner and the others tortured and demanded dowry to the defacto complainant. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner is only the sister-in-law of the defacto complainant, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppathur and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppathur and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7. The petitioner shall appear before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppathur within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 22/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUPPATHUR. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SIVAGANGAI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUPPATHUR, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. A.RAJ MOHAN Advocate SR.No.45459 SR : 26.12.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16928 of 2011 Date :22/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/