HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.15958 of 2011 ORDER: The writ petitioner, a minor represented by his natural mother and guardian, instituted this writ petition seeking either assignment or permission to acquire by way of sale, a piece of land, which is classified and described as poramboke land so as to have free ingress and egress to the agricultural lands owned by him. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue, promptly secured instructions from the Tahsildar, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittoor District, in the matter. It is pointed out by the Tahsildar that as per the village accounts of Brahamanapattu in Tirupathi Rural Mandal, the petitioner is having agricultural lands in Sy.Nos.257/2, 257/3, 257/5, 257/10, 257/11 and 257/12 to an extent of 0.17, 0.16, 0.31, 0.10, 0.09 and 0.43 respectively. It is further pointed out that adjacent to his patta land, the land belonging to the Government is also situated in Sy.No.261 measuring an extent of Ac.3.12 cents. The said land is classified as Kalva Poramboke (Canal Poramboke). Such lands are, in fact, prohibited from being assigned to anybody in view of Board Standing Order 15 (10) (4) (ii) (h). In fact, by judgment rendered on 10.12.2010 in W.P.No.19958 of 2003, this Court issued a Writ of Mandamus prohibiting assignment of any such land. Even prior thereto, the District Collector, Chittoor, has passed on necessary instructions through his circular B4/2425/93 dated 20.03.1994 imposing total ban in Tirupathi urban, Tirupathi rural, Chandragiri and Renigunta mandals against the assignment of Government lands for agricultural purposes to landless poor persons, political sufferers and Ex-servicemen and also on payment of market value to any other person or agency. In view of these statements, the claim of the writ petitioner either for assignment of land of Ac.0.12 cents or for purchasing the said land at market value from the Government so as to have ingress and egress to his land is incapable of being acceded to, but certain classes of lands which are classified such as canal poramboke are incapable of being assigned to any particular party as such lands are meant to be used as buffer for various irrigation or agricultural purposes, for community use and benefit and such canal poramboke lands can be provided for ingress and egress to various agricultural fields situate beyond the said poramboke lands so as to enable all the land owners to carry on agricultural operations and also for carrying on their cattle as well as their agricultural implements. In view of the categorical statement of the Tahsildar, Tirupathi Rural that land of an extent of Ac.3.12 cents situate in Sy.No.261, which is classified as Kalva Poramboke (Canal poramboke), the said lands cannot be assigned and as such the Writ Petition cannot be entertained and accordingly it is dismissed observing that the land in Sy.No.261 measuring an extent of Ac.3.12 cents belonging to the Government and classified as kalva poramboke be not assigned in favour of any third parties at all. No costs. Copy of the instructions received by the learned Government Pleader for Revenue from the Tahsildar, Tirupathi Rural is taken on record in this case. ___________________________________ JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO 13-06-2011 Gsn.