Crl. Misc. No. M-26635 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-26635 of 2011 Date of Decision: December 19, 2011 Surender Kumar …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Surender Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner seeks the concession of regular bail in a case registered at the instance of Satyawan, complainant alleging that the petitioner had enticed away his niece. Petitioner is named in the FIR to be a suspect. He was allegedly found missing on the day the prosecutrix disappeared from the house. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been in custody for the lat more than one year and that the petitioner is involved Crl. Misc. No. M-26635 of 2011 [2] in the case merely on the basis of suspicion alongwith his other co-accused who had allegedly made some disclosure statement to the police regarding handing over of a mobile phone given by the petitioner to the prosecutrix. It is alleged that on the basis of week suspicious the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. On the other hand, State counsel has contended that 12 witnesses out of 22 witnesses stand already examined. After hearing counsel for the petitioner and the State counsel, I am of the considered opinion that it will be premature to enter into the niceties of the trial and to weigh the strength of the prosecution evidence to find out whether prima facie, the petitioner is connected to the deceased or is responsible for the sexual assault or murder. No ground is made out to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. In case the prosecution is not able to complete the entire evidence within a period of six months after the receipt of a certified copy of this order, it will be open to the petitioner to approach this Court again. December 19, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE