IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.Review No. 39/2010 Decided on:21.7.2010 _____________________________________________ Shiv Charan. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. M.C. Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. Advocate General. ____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. M.C. Verma submits that his client may be permitted to make a representation to respondent No.4 for the redressal of his grievance. Consequently, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to respondent No.4 for the redressal of his grievance within a period of three weeks from today. In the event of filing representation by the petitioner, the same shall be considered by respondent No.4 in accordance with law within a period of ten weeks after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 In the light of above, the review petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 21.7.2010 *awasthi*