IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 26136 of 1999 Between: C.Krishna Reddy, S/o.C.Chandra Reddy, Head Quarters , Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of A.P., Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home (Pol.D) Department, Secretariat , Hyderabad. 2 The Director General and Inspector General of Police, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Lakdikapool , Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City , Hyderabad. 4 The Registrar, A.P.Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents-1 & 2 to implement the orders Dt: 22-6-1999 oassed in CMA.No.84/97 in C.A.No.316/97 in O.A.No.5468/95 immediately by declaring the action of the Respondents 1 & 2 in not complying the orders of the Hon'ble Tribunal as illegal , arbitrary and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.RATNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU Writ Petition No.26136 of 1999 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Ramulu) This writ petition is filed seeking implementation of the order dated 22-6-1999 in C.A.No.316 of 1997 with C.M.A.No.84 of 1997 in O.A.No.5468 of 1995 on the file of Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad. 2. The official respondents have filed counter-affidavit in the writ petition stating that during the pendency of writ petition, the request of the petitioner – applicant was considered as per Rules and implemented the orders of the Tribunal by assigning notional seniority on par with his juniors. Further, the post of DSP (AR) being a second level Gazetted post, the selection shall be based on merit and ability and thus, the case of the petitioner was considered for promotion as DSP (AR) on merit and ability. He was found to be not fit for such promotion. 3. In the above circumstances, no relief whatsoever can be granted and the writ petition is therefore closed. ___________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J. ___________________ C.V.RAMULU, J. 17-07-2008 bsc