IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9478 of 2008. Decided on: 27.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Piare Lal. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. None for respondents No.3 to 6. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): The petitioner, on the basis of recommendations of Departmental Promotion Committee, was promoted to the post of Clerk on 29.2.1988 (Annexure A-2). However, vide office order dated June 23, 2003 (Annexure A-11) his date of promotion has been altered from 29.2.1988 to 27.6.1994. Admittedly, the petitioner has not been heard before issuance of office order dated 23rd June, 2003. Once the petitioner has been promoted to the post of Clerk, that too, on the basis of recommendations of Departmental Promotion Committee, his date of 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - promotion could not unilaterally be altered from 29.2.1988 to 27.6.1994. The petitioner has been working on the higher post on the basis of Annexure A-2. The petitioner has also been placed in the higher pay- scale pursuant to Annexure A-2. Since the status and salary of the petitioner has been reduced without hearing him, he has suffered civil and evil consequences. The petitioner ought to have been heard before issuance of Annexure A-11, dated 23rd June, 2003. 2. Consequently, the petition is allowed. Annexure A-11, dated 23rd June, 2003 is quashed and set aside. However, liberty is reserved to the respondents to proceed with the matter in accordance with law. However, while dealing with the matter, the respondents shall take into consideration that the petitioner had been working on the higher post actually with effect from 29th February, 1988 till date. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 27, 2010. (sck).