THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P. No. 5661 of 2010 O r d e r: This C.R.P. is directed against the order dated 08.11.2010, passed by the III Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, dismissing the application in I.A. No. 50 of 2010 in I.A. No. 1234 of 2008 in O.S. No. 336 of 2008, filed by the petitioners, praying to send agreement of release dated 10.10.2006, counter in I.A. No.1234 of 2009, vakalath and written statement of the respondents to a handwriting expert for comparison and for report. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the order under revision. The petitioner filed the suit for declaration and perpetual injunction. Along with the suit, the petitioners filed temporary injunction application, stating that respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and late Katta Chandramma, executed agreement of release dated 10.10.2006. The respondents filed counter denying execution of the agreement of release dated 10.10.2006 and further contended that since the same is not registered, and therefore, inadmissible in evidence. Since the petitioners are seeking temporary injunction based on agreement of release, the execution of which is denied by the respondents, and considering the fact that they have also raised objection as to its admissibility in evidence on the ground that it is not registered, the Court below felt that unless and until the marking of the agreement of release is considered, it would not be proper to send the documents in question to a handwriting expert at this stage, and holding that the application is premature, rejected the same by reason of the order under revision, and no exception can be taken thereto. For the foregoing reasons, I find no reason whatsoever to interfere with the order under revision in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. There is no merit in the C.R.P., and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 15th December, 2010 KSR