S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.4935/2006 Date : 07.11.2006 HON'BLE MR. SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. B.K. Vyas ) Mr. Ajay Vyas )for the applicants. Mr. V.R. Mehta, Public Prosecutor for State. I have heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. After hearing learned counsel for the parties while taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the present case and the fact that the marriage had taken place 9 years ago and the present applicants are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the complainant and on perusal of the impugned order passed by learned Sessions Judge, Bikaner, I am of the opinion that it is a case where the applicant should be given benefit of anticipatory bail to the applicants. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest of applicants (1) Sukh Lal S/o Sagarmal Bafna and (2) Smt. Sarla W/o Sukhlal Bafna by I.O./S.H.O. in FIR No.66/2006 P.S. Mahila Thana, Bikaner, they shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- alongwith two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of Investigating Officer on the following conditions:- (i)That they shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii)That they shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and; (iii)That they shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vij vijayant