IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 502 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 502 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 502 OF 2006 Rashid Irani. ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Maharashtra & 4 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. R.L. Tolat i/b L.C. Tolat for the petitioner. Mr. M.D. Naik, AGP, for the respondent No.1. Ms. T. Puranik for the respondent No.2. Ms. R.D. Bhatia for the respondent No.4. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 09TH MARCH, 2006 P.C. : . The petitioner was merely an agent of the Receiver. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 24th June, 2005 in Notice of Motion No. 2313 of 2004 in Suit No. 514 of 1984 and other related matters, certain directions were given. It appears that the Heritage Committee has now rejected permission for putting up a hoarding on the building. If that be the case, the petitioner, who is only an agent of the Receiver, really can have no grievance and at the highest it is for the : 2 : Receiver to take steps which in law he may be entitled to. 2. With the above observation, Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]