THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5190 of 2008 ORDER: This civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 15.10.2008 passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Medchal in I.A.No.1702 of 2008 in O.S.No.337 of 2004. According to the petitioner/plaintiff, he filed the suit for partition of the suit schedule property and separate possession. Alleging that inadvertently, all the suit schedule survey numbers have been mentioned in a single schedule of the property with common boundaries, he filed the present I.A under Order VI Rule 17 C.P.C seeking to amend the plaint schedule property as plaint A to D schedule of the properties. The respondent/defendant contested the matter by filing a counter-affidavit denying the material allegations in the petition/affidavit and stating that the plaintiff after examining P.W.1 and three independent witnesses on his behalf filed the present application at a belated stage and that the proposed amendment cannot be considered, as it changes the entire location of the suit schedule lands. The Court below, after hearing the learned counsel on either side, and after perusing the entire material available on record, and following the decision of the Supreme Court in AJENDRAPRSADJI N.PANDE vs. SWAMI KESHAVPRAKESHDASJI.N AND OTHERS[1], dismissed the I.A. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. A perusal of the impugned order indicates that the suit has been filed in the year 2004, issues have been framed as long back as on 27.11.2006, entire evidence of the plaintiff has been completed on 24.07.2008 and the matter was coming up for the evidence of defendants. At that stage the plaintiff filed the present I.A. Even a perusal of the suit schedule reveals that the plaintiff has given different survey numbers with respective extents and all the four boundaries were shown as neighbours’ land. Further, the plaintiff has not assigned sufficient reasons for amendment of the plaint schedule property. In the circumstances, if the amendment is allowed at this belated stage, prejudice would be caused to the defendants and therefore, the Court below has rightly dismissed the I.A and the impugned order does not call for any interference by this Court. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. N.V.RAMANA, J Date.22.12.2009 va [1] AIR 1997 Supreme Court 806