CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.13671 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.13671 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: AUGUST 5 , 2010 Ram Narain Rathee .....Petitioner VERSUS Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Rohtak & another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH. PRESENT: Mr. Jagjeet Beniwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Would a person, who was proceeded against and punished on 94 occasions for allegation of embezzlement and was facing eight such notices for termination of services, need any consideration in exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction. When the petitioner was awarded the impugned punishment in the present case, eight cases of embezzlement were pending against him and in four cases notices were issued to him for termination of services. This position is not disputed in any manner. Relief any, if granted, would be futile and it would only lead to make the petitioner to fade the pending notices/enquiries. It is not a fit case for invoking extra CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.13671 of 2010 -2- ordinary writ jurisdiction. Facts are such, which would desist the Court to invoke its jurisdiction. Dismissed. August 5, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE