THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.1631 of 2011 Date:15th June, 2011 Between: 1. Kamsali Srinivasulu & Anr. ..... Petitioners AND 1. V.Manyam & Ors. .....Respondents *** THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.1631 of 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 29.03.2011, passed in I.A.No.143 of 2011 in O.S.No.5 of 2011 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy, Mahabubnagar District, whereby and whereunder the learned Senior Civil Judge allowed the application filed by the defendants and appointed Sri K.Venkataramana, Advocate as Commissioner to measure the suit land with the assistance of surveyor and note down the boundaries. 2. Background facts in a nutshell leading to filing of this revision by the plaintiffs in O.S.No.5 of 2011 are: The petitioners claim that they are the owners of the Ac.0.17 guntas in Survey No.32/A and that the defendants have no claim over the same. Whereas, it is the case of the defendants that total extent of land available in Survey Nos.32, 33 and 34 was only Ac.2.20 guntas and not Ac.2.39 guntas. The defendants moved I.A.No.143 of 2011 seeking appointment of Commissioner to measure the land with the assistance of Surveyor and to note down the boundaries. The said application came to be allowed by the trial Court. Hence, this revision by the plaintiffs. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the Advocate Commissioner inspected the suit land and measured the same with the assistance of surveyor in the absence of the petitioners. A further submission has been made that the petitioners have not chosen to be present at the time of survey in view of the pendency of the revision before this Court. 5. It is brought to my notice that the Advocate Commissioner appointed by the trial Court has inspected the suit land on 13.06.2011 and report of the Advocate Commissioner is not yet filed before the trial Court as on this day. 6. In that view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to direct the Advocate Commissioner appointed by the trial Court to re-inspect the suit land after putting on notice both the parties and submit his report. 7. With the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of at the admission stage. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:15th June, 2011. Note: Issue C.C. within two days. B/O cs THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.1631 of 2011 Date:15th June, 2011