^^ ^r^-%^ ^ '"^ Q^nmiQ 18 i?ill^lE ZN SH@ HI©H QOURT ©'s' JUDieAWRE AT BILAgPm? (C©) WEIT PESESI©NM©, 4-31 2- ©.?2©©4 BitNEEN ^al Bas rEan<3iyar agec! about SB year@/ ^o Shri JMngwfe Das SaPClya^ ^cau|?ation seryiee^ 'NDi^irig as Aaeountant^glodk Qffice^ %s<3©l 4?' 2?@si^ent of Kas<^l lefesil ^Kas<33l»iQistEiGt; mipur lElSSTIONEl ^::^^^^- ^88"'"1'"'^?-^"":"""" d..^^"T II'W1® !<? %@ Sfat®of €hhatMsgarfV-fchsoagh -bhe ^eer^aey ^Etsjpartaient of SGla©ol S<3»sati©n^Mantralay^ ©•K.S. Buildingy mipur (03)« 2«* She J&in-t Secretary^ SSAiattisgarh State » Sehool E(3acatdlon Eepartment^ mipur (©G), .^t ^\yj Bts-teriGfe Bducation ©ffiaer, i^ur (©©). EiS'EWMNti WRIt PE2'I3'I©Nt3NBeR ARSICLBS 226/227 ©?SHE @©NSTlSUrE]:ON©F I^gIA<^.......... ,,,......,,.,. . .. ^_ ,. ,., ^L,..^ XI-HC-22 3^?T^T f^TWW^T sb^Ich^f?cT 3^ "MI-^ICt^, «iTn'Mj|(o, fs)dlti^< [?T^5|Cft ^IKdl $h<4j<b '^^'"'•"•'••"•'"•^^ 200<^- f^[' W^T^RfTW^cT Belinetara, thfe 7'4-2QOSr On a mention being made| Mr. Sunil Sahu, counsel fc|r the Mr. Sudhjr Agrawal, Pane^ Heard both the counsel. The petitioner has prefen|ed Constitution of jndia, being (Annexure P-2) whereby the pefJtioner Saja, Educationai District Seoondary School, Saja, on petitioner 1s that he has beon and as the wife of the petitione^- Panchdyat, Kasdol on theticket |of the been made to quash the order ds|tect Learned counsel for the petition, th©petitioner has been i joln on the ne>dt place of postin^. the place ofposting Le. Higher] that no post is vacant at Saja, Education Officer, Baiod (Bei|netara) Secretary, School Education, been passed. Learned counseji lytng vacant, jn the given situati|on, representetion to respondent N^. and pass appropriate order reg^ Sudhir Agrawal, iearned Panel objection. G4>vt ch1^^41T1 Hl^^lT^'te^l'<Rl^K ^3:rf^R'3TI^T the case is td<en up for hearing. petjhoner. [ Lawyer for the State/respondente. »n|edthis petition under Artide 226/227 of the a&grieved by the order dated 14-10-2004 has been transferred from Kasdoi to in Uie Government Girls Higher post of Accounterd. Furthor case of tho tr^n$ferred without any oompIaJnt against him refused to contest the etection of Janpad ruling party. Therefore, a request has 114-10-2004. Isetitioner submits ftiat after filing of this writ Ireiieved in the month of November, 2004, to }. However,/when ttie petitioner reported at Secondary Schoot, Saja, he vras informed frnd vide tetterdated 10-3-2005, the District sought gujdance from the Joint 34>vt. of Chhattisgarh, but so far no order has fijrther submite that tho postat Kasdol fe i, the petitioner may be atlowed to make a >.2 and he be directed to decide ttie same arding posting of the petitioner to which Mr. j-awyer for the State of Chhattisgarh has no XI-HC-22 J^* ^NId^, ^Tfl^^l^, fctdiy^< 3TT^T ^(<^TT$b^|ct) ^lq^^l ..^P.-^.J.1 .. .".v.\ ^. .. /..—..'..^. 2oo^_ 3TT^T^F)T f^rf^^n^T shHicb^rfN' Soma ^ 3TT^T^<TTW:^f?cT ^y/ ""i^ - '2-4- Having heard iearned coi(nsel facts and drcumslances of the| representetion to respondent respondent No.2 is directed grievances raised by the petiti^ner date of receipt of the when the petitioner has been vacant there, the Joint appropriate order regarding the Wtth the directions afores^Jd, Consequently, M.(W.)P.( stand disposed of. Partiesare represen(ation Secre^iry for the parties and having regard to the case, the petitioner is allowed to make a |No.2 within ten days from today, and Ijo pass appropriate order consjdering the wittiin a period of one month from the i, inaccordance with law. Parficularty tijansferred to Saja and the same post is not f, School Education, is directed to pass l^ostjng ofthe petitioner. I, the petition stands disposed of. .No.4666/2004 and JA.No.2074/2005 also ^I^^^^H^T^te^tifa^K ^3Tf^T3TT^T entitted for certlfled copy of thjs order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (^^fe^)