IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA,THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT APPEAL NO : 1592 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 29/09/2004 in WP NO : 17499 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 Chenna Goni Vardaiah Gound S/o Late C.Kistaiah R/o Hayathnagar Village & Mandal Under L.B.Nagar Municiaplity , R.R.District. 2 Chenna Goni Prabhakar Goud S/o Late C.Kistaiah R/o Hayathnagar Village & Mandal Under L.B.Nagar Municiaplity , R.R.District. 3 Chenna Goni Ram Mohan Goud S/o Late Kistaiah R/o Hayathnagar Village & Mandal Under L.B.Nagar Municiaplity , R.R.District. 4 Chenna Goni Sheshi Raju Goud S/o Late C.Kristaiah R/o Hayathnagar Village & Mandal Under L.B.Nagar Municiaplity , R.R.District. 5 Chenna Goni Madan Gound S/o Late C.Kistaiah R/o Hayathnagar Village & Mandal Under L.B.Nagar Municiaplity , R.R.District. ..... APPELLANTS AND 1 The Joint Collector Ranga Reddy District. Office at 177, Khairatabad, Hyderabad-14 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Office at Hayathnagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 3 L.Chandraiah S/o Bangaraiah H.No.Bagh Hayathnagar Village, Hayathanagar Mandal, R.R.District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.ALI FAROOQUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the respondent No.3: None appeared. The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice) The order passed by the first respondent under Section 9 of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattedar Passbooks Act, 1971 was questioned in the writ petition by the appellants. Writ petition was dismissed. Appeal is against the said order. Admittedly, order was passed by the first respondent allowing the revision of the third respondent after notice to the appellants. None of the points raised in the writ petition or in this appeal were ever raised by them before the first respondent. By the order impugned in the writ petition, only entries have been changed in the pahani. Learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition on the ground that question raised could not have been gone into by the Joint Collector and in case appellants are aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach the Civil Court. View taken by the learned single Judge is perfectly justified and we see no reason to interfere with such order. Appeal dismissed. ___________________ DEVINDER GUPTA, CJ 29-10-2004 _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Tvr To 1 The Joint Collector Ranga Reddy District. Office at 177, Khairatabad, Hyderabad-14 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Office at Hayathnagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District. 3 2 CCs to the Govt. Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyd. (OUT) 4 2 CD copies.