IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37263 of 2010 MUKESH PRASAD @ MUKESH SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 4/ 09.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Torture is followed by demand of dowry which according to the learned counsel for the petitioner is not believable as having no accommodation of the complainant with family members of the petitioner, she left matrimonial home came only on initiation of Family Court which was taken in restitution case filed by this petitioner. Again she left the matrimonial home and making allegation of demand also may never be believed for refusal of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Pathi P.S. Case No. 16 of 2010 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sikrahna at Motihari subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)