:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1442 OF 2001 Dr. Subhash D. Kadam. ..Petitioner. Vs. Shri.SureshD. Kadam and ors. ..Respondents. Mr.U.R.Agandsurve for the Petitioner. Mr.P.A.Pol, APP. for the State. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATED : 09.4.2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Advocate for the petitioner and the A.P.P. for the State. 2. This petition is filed by one Dr. Subhash Kadam for return of muddemal property seized in C.R.No.93/2001 on the footing that he is the acting Principal of the College to which the property belong. The respondent No.1 also claim to be the acting Principal and he also filed an application for return of the muddemal property. It appears from the record that there is a dispute as to who is the acting Principal. The two lower courts have returned the muddemal property to respondent No.1. It is noticed that the property is released on the condition of execution of bond of Rs.25,000/- and to produce the property before the :2: Magistrate Court as and when called by the trial court. In other words, the property has been secured. The Criminal Court has no jurisdiction to decide as to who is the true acting Principal. There are two concurrent findings of the lower courts. In this view of the matter, this is not a fit case to exercise the writ jurisdiction of this court. Hence, writ petition is rejected. (R. S. MOHITE, J.)