IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 19615 of 2007 Between: Gundlapaly Lakshmana Rao S/o Venkata Rama Rao r/o Chandupatla (V), Nakirekal (M), Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Nakirekal, Nalgonda district. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MRS.A.SHAKUNTALA for MR.G.LNARASIMHA RAO & ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantial relief: ‘For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and that are to be urged at the time of hearing, the petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to conduct, properly investigate and take the necessary action against the culprits involved in the theft in the petitioner's house registered as a crime in FIR No. 153/2006 of PS, Nakirekal, and do the justice in recovering the stolen articles and cash and hand over to the petitioner and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice.’ Smt.A.Shakuntala, learned Counsel representing Sri G.L.Narasimha Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that in view of the filing of charge sheet by the Police and recovery of the stolen articles, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration. The Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.25263 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 18th April, 2008 lur