IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15842 of 2011 Sajjad Alam Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 01.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. The petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 1.3.2011 and it is said that the Mukhiya of the concerned Panchayat did not make payment to the informant and some other teachers who were earlier terminated by the Mukhiya and Secretary of the aforesaid Panchyat but subsequently their termination order was quashed by the Tribunal and the aforesaid order of Tribunal was upheld up to this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that prior to termination, the informant and other teachers had already got their salary and so far as the period after termination is concerned, there was no specific direction either of the Tribunal or of this Court to make payment to the informant as well as other teachers. It is also pointed out by him that being the Mukhiya, the petitioner has already sought direction from his superior authorities. To fortify the aforesaid fact, he drew my attention towards Annexure-2 to this petition. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the informant submitted that in spite of specific direction of this Court as well as Hon’ble Lokayukta, the petitioner has not 2 made payment to the informant and others. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Sajjad Alam be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in Barari P.S. Case No. 7 of 2011. Ravi/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)