Si'»VLc::: rtfcSKW (L o' ^2- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S.)NO. l^^C /2010 PETITIONER: VERSUS RESPONDENTS .••^-s^'' ^?iF- ^cs^ ^•%%>"" ...-•'^?^"' ^^' s^y'- '/,-''' v ''^e'>,^fs—''wy/ '^'j^Kvf'y ^' Ayodhya Prasad Shukla aged about 49 years, S/o Late Dukhu Ram Shukla, present posting Lecturer Govt. Higher Secondaxy School, Bhaisma, Block Korba, District Korba (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) The Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Korba, District Korba (C.G.) The Joirtt Director Treasi.uy aecQunts andPension Bilaspur Division Bilaspur (C.G.) The Distnet Education OfBcer Korba, District Korba (C.G.) The. BIock Education OfKcer Korba, District Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF mPIA POR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. ^,' RI- \.fi Arun Petjtjoner Re^ximtent HIGH COURT OR CHHATTISQARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PEnTION <S) N0.1476 of2018 Ayodhya Prasad ShAla Versus State of CWiattiagarh & others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTICTM OF INDIA (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Safeh K. Agnihotri, J.) 2. 3. Present:- Shri K.S. Pawa-, Advocate foi the petitioner. ^hri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel l^wyerforthft SUite. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 6" 6f Apri!, 2010) With the consent of laarned eounsel appearnig for tfie parties, tlw petition is heard finallys. Learned counsel appearing for ftie petitioner submjts that the petitioner was appointed initially asAssi^ant Teacheron a fixed pay crf Rs; 150/- on probatjon. Ater completion of his pr<Aatian period, the petitjoner was granted regutar pay scale of Rs. 16S-300/-. Leamed counsel further submte that ttie iasue invotved in the case is asto whather the petitioner is entitled tp regular pay scate with effect from the dstte of initial appointmentor after compleflon of probatfon period. The issue involved herein was considered by the Medhya Pradesfri State Admintetrative Tribunal, Jabalpur (for sfiort "^e SAF} 'ui O.A.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and56 ottwrs fts. Stoteof M.P. & othefs), wha-ein it was held that the stmilariy situated teacheis are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date (rf initiat appomtment The matter was taken up to the Supreme Court. Theapgeal was diemiss«l by the Supreme Court, upholding Ihe decision of the Trftiunal to tha effect that the Teachers/Assislant Teadheis are entMed to ragutar [»y scale from date of initial appolntment In vi®wof the above submissions made l^ learned counset for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of. On request of the learned counsel, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation to the respondent authorities, if so advised, t®censider his case aid pags - appropriateorder, on it3 own merit and in its perspective, inthe Bght of the orderpassed bythe SAT in /lfec uAwrfyadb(supra), 3ubiBeqi»ntly confirmed by the Supreme Gourt in Special Leave Petifcn (eivil) No. 6892/93 by order dated 3-1-1994. The aulfcorities shall consider and passthe order in accordancewith law eiqieditiously. _- - \ Sd/- \ SatishK.Agnihotri \ Judge