-c ." -;" :-"•'---:'?L?^frPa^pp-^K»*-^^yK^T. ivsv^iww sww9''.s>sssff'''ls'''''.~^'s'-''e: ^ 'li Petitioner Resppndent HtGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition (Ct No. 4396 otMW Kisan Mazdoor Sangh, Raipur, through its Convener Shri La!it Chandranahu, son of Shri late Bhushan Lal aged 55 years, resident of Station Road, Mahasamund ^ Versus The Chhattisgarh Pubiic Commission (Lokayukt), through the Secretary, Chhattisgarh Pubiic Commission, Rajpur. 0/Vrit Petition under Article 226 of tihie Constitutionof tndia.) Singte Beneh: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. ^nihofri, J. Present: Shri Dinesh Thvari, counsel for the petitioner. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 11 day of August, 2008) Learned counsei aDDearina for the Detitioner submits that the impugned report dated 4-9-2006 (Annexure P/1) is bad on account of the fact that the respondent has considered the case at length and thereafter hasfound thatthe altegations made against the alleged non-applicantswere not found oroved. Learned counsel further submits that in the event the respondent decides to dismiss the complaint, there should not be any finding, but it has to be dismissed simplicitor without assigning reasons. The next submission of learned counset is that the respondent shoutd not have dismissed the cpmpiaint- without issuing a notice to the eomplalnant though the complaint has been filed by the complainant. 2) All the above stated grounds raised by leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner are not sustainable in law. in the event a complaint is made, it has to be established,prima facie, whether it is necessary to issue a notics .s:i ;-'l: ili!;!f; ws i'w >ii p to the persons against whom a complaint has been made. The respondent has passed the order after examining the comptaint ofthe petitioner and did not find that the allegations made therein haye been estabtished. The order is perfectty iegal and proper. Thus, the contenta'onof the petitioner that no reasons should be recorded before rejecting the complaint, is frivoious without any basis. Thirdty, the principteof natural Justicecannot be put on c^ straight jacket as it dependsdn the factsand circumstancesof thecase. The complaint made by the petitioner was examined by the respondent and it was not necessary to give a notice to the complainant to establish hls case when prima facie, it was found that there was nothing in thecomptaint. The petitioner has not challenged the report on anyother ground other than what is stated above. 4) in view ofthe foregoing, there is nothing in ttiis matter. The petition, being frivolousand meritless, is accordingiy dismissed. Raju Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ";s