IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 6445 of 2010 Decided on: 8.10.2010 M/s H.P. Enterprises, Ghumarwin …Petitioner Versus Union of India and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Mr. Amit S. Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ashok Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for respondents No. 1 and 2. None for respondents No. 3 to 15. _______________________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) : Though, several reliefs are sought by the petitioner in the writ petition, ultimately learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the liberty may be reserved to the petitioner to pursue his grievances before the appropriate Forum and this Court may limit the relief to direction to the Bank to consider Annexure P-16 i.e. representation filed by the petitioner. In case the representation filed by the petitioner has been received by respondents No. 14 and 15, they may consider the same in accordance with law and justice before proceeding further in the matter. The action taken on the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- representation of the petitioner will be duly communicated to it. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the directions have been issued only on the request of the petitioner in that regard. 3. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications(s), if any. Copy dasti on usual terms. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 8, 2010 (Awasthi/K. Attri)