y;i'Y^U' ???.! IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSOARH, BILASFUR WRIT PETITIONtSl NO.^.^.i.OF 2011 PETITIONER '»k, ^ ;c-^^-^ ^< :7'""..^\7y'A ^y:.^^ ?^^ " V RESPONDENTS ^J?^-. / Khagendra Kuraar Sahu, S/o Late Shri Daras Ram Sahu, Aged about 25 years, R/o ViUage Sarkho, Tahsil Janjgu-, Thana & Distnct- Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgeu-h. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, District Raipur, CUhattisgarh. Collector, Janjgir Champa, District Janjgu'-Chatnpa, Chhattisgarh. District Education Officer, Janjgir Champa, District Janjgu-- Champa, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. j? S ''^ tw<<^ ^j iVW SB : HOB''BLE JUSTICE Pm'HMKER DIW.AKSR P.(St N0. Khagendra Kuiaar Satiu '^ <y A- ./.vjr. £& Otiiers Shri. Sunil Sahu, co-ansel for fhe oe Stiri N. Naha Rov, P.L. for the State. il8.0S.20lli ^ Counsel for the petttioner SLibmits fhat the purpose. of fili&g fhis petition would be served if direction is issued to tfae respondent No.3 to decide the pending represenmtion of the petitiQner seeidn.g conipassionate appoiD.tm.ent on account of tbe suddeu demise of b.is tather late SIiri Daras Ram Sahu who was workuig as Peon •in tb.e School Education Department. State counsel has no objection if fhe pending rcpresentation of the petitioa.er is decided in accordance wifli law. Accordillgly, t'he petition is disiaissed as n'ithdrswn wifti tae aforesaid liberty. it is expected from fhe resp. No.3 to decide tta.e pending representation of the peti.tioner if already not decided, m accoidaace with law. It 1s inade clear fhat this coiu-t has not expressed'&ny opiiiion on the merits of tbe case acd the authoritv concerBed would be at Hbeny to decide fhe representation strictly ia a.ccordaa.ce witti law. Sd/- ! Prititsker Diwaker ^ Judge ;