1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1349 OF 2008 DIST.: MUMBAI Mala Parsuram Giri ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. A.M. Saraogi i/by Mr. Paras N. Vira for the Petitioner Mrs. S.D. Shinde, Additional Public Prosecutor, for Respondent No. 1 Mr. B.M. Shaikh for Respondent No. 2. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 1, 2008 P.C.:- 1. The petitioner seeks a direction to quash C.R No. 94 of 2008. 2. Admittedly, the First Information Report discloses commission of cognizable offences. It is true that no person was named as accused in the F.I.R., but it was stated that a person was collecting extortion money and was operating in an area in the name of one Mala. The report further discloses that according to the informant, the petitioner had nothing to do with the extortion, which was made by somebody 2 else. On the basis of this information, it appears that the police had arrested some person, and, therefore, this Writ Petition has been filed by Mala, who was arrested and then released on bail. The petitioner submits that since he had not been named as an accused in the case, therefore, the F.I.R. should be quashed. He also submits that the complainant himself gave an affidavit before the police, saying that all the three persons, who had been arrested by the police, were accused in this case. 3. These are all matters which have to be decided by the investigating agency during the investigation. If we take the responsibility of finding out who was the accused out of these persons in this case, the High Court would be converting itself into an investigating agency, which is not possible and it is not desirable at all. For these reasons, we do not find merit in this petition, which is accordingly dismissed. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.