w\ iNTHEHON'BLE^flGHGOURtOFCHHATTISG.fl.RH ATBII-ASPUR CONTEMPTPETITION No. ?<3t^ / 2007 PETITIONER ^^: RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. B".'4b-:-^iSIII^ ^ltBd^s1%tI^ ^.......••C^-^'1T-- / 2. RECiKgD£cop]r ^^r^^^,:' :/ eLERltoA.G.81LAP7'"» ^^^^ 4. Subash Mohapatra S/Q. . Late Shri Jalandhar Mohapatra, aged about- 34 years, R/o. MIG-22, . Sahayog Park, Mahaveer Nagar, Raipur; Chhattisgarh Uday Ram Sahu, particulars non known, Occupafcion.- Police Qfficer,Posted at: Gole Bazar Police Station, Raipur . MT". Ghoi, particylars non known, Occupation - Police Offtcer, Posted at Go le Bazar-Police Station, Raipur ,CC.G.): ,., ;1;:- :',. ., . Home Secretary, Sfcate Government 6f • ChMattisgarh,D,K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.5 Director General of Po.liee, Chhattisgarh, Police Headquarter Raipyr (G.G.) .SyReriTifendent Qf^Police, .Raipu r^ Distt. - Raipur (G. GV w ^•: CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE'SlS OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIAREADWITH PRQVISIONSOF THECQNTEMPTQFCOURT&ACT REGARDING 6niMINAfe1CONTEMPT ii. l Bn lll'i II SD^T'W tewsn^r ^tlTclti^tfifli Tumane ~T°? '•^i'tM'y, dTi)'yJi<i, RiwKiy ^^r TRra? ^.5 ^wni ^([jq;—•——•—•—•—"••——•-•^p^ 200 •^re^r' ai^r TOfgT ^ifCT SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohaik Shrivastava. J 19-01-2011 tlte Shri Sourabh Dangi, counsel Heard, Leamed counsel for the petit^ner contempt petition has sought initiati^n respondents, who arrested the pjet directives and mandates given by Basu vs. State of West Bengal,\ submits that though this petition wa^ instruoted as to the result of the cj which the petitioner was arrested. Ht he is unabte to seek instructtons, Upon being asked as to wh^ther action of the respondent initially in petittoner submitsthat he has nc| petitioner. There is nothing on assailed legatity and validity oftte| authority including his arrest in an\| proper pleadings and documents, petition. Accordingly, the petition is petitioner to revive the same by prq^erly |br the f»tittoner. tttis firlal '»i<it<-i<ilifmvS 4 fetfl <Pfl<^ii ^sipgii an^l submits that the petitioner by this ofcontempt proceedings against the letitioner without complying with the Supreme Court in the case of D. K. (1997)1 SCC 416. Learned counsel filed in theyear 2007, he has not been liminal proceedin^s in connection with further submits that in spite of efforts, the petltioner has challenged the proceedings, learned counsel for the instructbns in this regard from the to show that the petitioner had proceedings drawn by the respondent other proceedings. In the absence of Court is not inclined to entertain this a(iy rebord y disposed of reserving liberty to the constituted petition. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [4^ -afeA E-H