IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 25613 of 2005 BETWEEN: 1 Smt. Sabina Sharif, W/o Shaik Fiaz Sharif, Flat No.002, Ground Floor, Wing Shama-III, Piped Road, Kurla, Mumbai. 2 Fayas Shaik, S/o Hashim, R/o H.No.374, Manikonda (V), R.R. District. ... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Competent Authority/Additional Director General of police, C.I.D., A.P., Hyderabad. 2 The Government of A.P., represented by its Principal Secretary (Home), Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3 Charminar Cooperative Urban Bank, represented by its Administrator, situated at Purani Haveli, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the first and second respondent in issuing the G.O.Ms.No.212, Home (General-B), Department, dated 22-9- 2001 as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents not to disturb the possession or dispossess the petitioner from the property of the petitioners and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.C.B.RAM MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents 1 and 2: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.3: MR. N. RAMA MOHANA RAO The Court made the following: ORDER: Mr. B. Sunil, learned counsel representing Mr. C.B. Ram Mohan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J June 25, 2008 DSK