1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 13. CA/15280/2010 NANDAKISHOR V/S THE STATE In WP/3624/2009 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. Ajay G.Talhar, Adv., for the applicant. Mr.Pravin Waghmare, Adv., h/f Mr. H.S.Bedi, Adv., for R.4 and 5. Mr. V.G.Shelke, AGP for R/State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:29/10/2010 1. Application is moved seeking extension to deposit Rs. 50,000/-, which was not complied in terms of earlier order dt. 20.9.2010. 2. Mr.Talhar, learned Counsel, in order to substantiate his contentions, took me to page nos.32, 82, 84 to impress that inspite of there being deposit of Rs.2,00,000/- by the petitioner , the amount is again raised against him by debit entry. Learned Counsel 2 representing respondent Credit cooperative Society (respondent no.4) informs that there were two different loan arrangements of the petitioner and, consequently, the extracts or the vouchers are mixed and tried to be jumbled. Prima facie, I find substance in it. Since the orders of this Court are not complied in letter and spirit, even generating an impression of suppression of facts, I do not find any merit in the application seeking extension to deposit. The application is dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/15280-10ca