IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 20TH APRIL 2010 / 30TH CHAITHRA 1932 WA.No. 738 of 2010 -------------------- [AGAINST THE ORDER IN W.P(C) No. 10248 of 2010] APPELLANT(S): -------------- KAIPADATH PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (PVT) LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ABDULLA KAIPADATH REP. BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER M. ANTONY, S/O. MICHAEL, RESIDING AT PUTHOOR HOUSE, AMBALAPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.M.NARENDRA KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, THRISSUR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. SANDESH RAJA, K. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan & P.N. Ravindran, JJ. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.A. No. 738 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 20th day of April, 2010. J U D G M E N T Siri Jagan, J. Appellant is the petitioner in the writ petition. They challenge the interim order dated 8-4-2010 passed by the learned Single Judge. We have gone through the interim order. We are not satisfied that the learned Judge had committed any error in exercising his discretion in passing the interim order. Therefore, we do not find any merit in the writ appeal and accordingly, the same is dismissed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Sd/- P.N. Ravindran, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.