( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6643 OF 2010 Sk. Atik Sk. Umar and others PETITIONERS VERSUS The Chief Executive Officer, Wakf Board, Aurangabad & another RESPONDENTS .... Mr. S.S. Thombre, advocate for the petitioners. .... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 27th July, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The petition is against communication dated 14th June, 2010, which, in my opinion, is not final order as such. By the said communication (Exh-F to the petition), the petitioners were called upon to file their reply and on failure to file the reply, action under section 54 of the Wakf Act, 1995 was likely to be taken. 3. For the present, no such action has been taken. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is premature as it is filed only against the notice and no determination of any issue is yet done. In this view of the matter, the petition ( 2 ) is disposed of. The respondents shall not take any coercive action without giving two (2) weeks’ prior notice to the petitioners, regarding the removal of the petitioners from the premises. The petitioners are at liberty to take appropriate action after any adverse order is rendered. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/wp6643-10