IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 32075 of 2009(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- JAYALEKSHMI MENON M., CHERUBALA,PAPPANAMCODE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. (U.D.CLERK,DIRECTORATE OF HOMOEOPATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM) BY ADV. SRI.D.AJITHKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF HOMOEOPATHY,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, DIRECTORATE OF HOMOEOPATHY,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. LEENA GEORGE, U.D.CLERK,DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER (HOMOEO), THRISSUR. BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------ WP(C) No.32075 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated, this the 25th day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T Challenge in the writ petition is against Ext.P11 final gradation list of Upper Division Clerks in the Department of Homoeopathy, who were promoted after 01/10/1997. 2. The petitioner's case is that against Ext.P8 provisional gradation list, objections were invited by Ext.P9 pursuant to claims raised by the 4th respondent, and that she filed Ext.P10 objection, which was not considered while finalising the gradation list. 3. Since Ext.P11 gradation list is dated 14/11/2008, the case was adjourned with a direction to the learned Government Pleader to obtain instructions in the matter. Today, on instructions, she submits that an appeal filed by the petitioner against Ext.P11 is pending consideration of the Government. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner points out that, what is described by the learned Government Pleader as appeal, is Ext.P10, which was filed by the petitioner before the 3rd respondent and now forwarded WP(C) No.32075/2009 -2- by the 3rd respondent to the 1st respondent. Be that as it may, as according to the learned Government Pleader, an appeal preferred by the petitioner against the gradation list is pending consideration of the 1st respondent, it is directed that the 1st respondent shall consider the said appeal, whether it is Ext.P10 or not, with notice to the petitioner and other affected parties. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg