^: ^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 3663/2005 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^^^- ^^x ^^&y ^•' v^y Ku. Kiran Sao D/o Ganesh Ram Sao, aged 20 years R/o Sarkha, Tah. Janjgir, District Janjgir- Champa [Chhattisgarh] •t? VERSUS :-!]. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of - Panchayat and Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.]. 2] The Collector, Janjgir-Champa [CG] 3] Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa [C.G.]. t>^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ a»t», HiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR PETiTiONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION N0.3683 OF 2005 Ku. Kiran Sao Versus State of Chhattisaarh & Others (Writ Petition under Articie 226/227 ofthe Constitutionof India) Single Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. '•^^' Present:- Shri S.K. Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panei Lawyerfor the Stats. Shri Sandeep Dubey, Advocate for the respondent No.3. G-RDER-- (P§ssedon this 4th day of May, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the question of law involved herein asto whether the semces' of Shiksha Karmi Grade-SSi, after appointment can be cancelled on the ground that there was irregularity in the selection process, The said issue was considersd and .decided bv this Court in Ku. Punam & Others v. State of ^ •isaa!fj& Others\ 2. Learned counse! appearing for the other side fairly submit that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in Ku. Punam & Others (supra). 3. Thls very question came up for consideration before this Court in Ku. Punam & OViers (supra). Whiieatlov/ing the case of Ku. Punam & Othar (suDra'i. this Courtobserved as under: "22. The cases on hand afB not the casas of canceliaSon of ihe aetecSon pfocess, ve setecffoo process ftave nof &esn tound viiiated on aceount of any reason including mass cop^ng or mass irregulariffes ; The pfssent cases afe where vs appointment cwSers, after having given eftect to, have bsen cancelled subseqiKntiy, ondiscovery oi some facts Wat some of the candidates had submitted false and forged etocuments toobtaintheappointfrsents. •% ^ '^ ~y 23. Applwng the well principles of 'aw to the facts of the present cases, ths respondents/authoritiss have aitvady prepared s sscona seiect rst Oi'? the -basis of the se!ecaons helcf earSer. On scmtiny, most of the candidates found c-1ace in the second list and thelr appointments ars convnu'sng, as such. some oftne candidatss co^.&^ n^t find s Discs Ln ths ssc^n^ /i-st sffsr scnftiny on account of doubthii dowmenis siibmitted by them. ii is, iherefore. directed the cand'dates who heve nat foitncf p/sce m rte second iist tse anbrcfed a.o oppc-riunsty oi hearing. to estabssh Qenuineness, fruihfulness ofthe dcxwnents t>v them tor apFOint'nent '-on tfte posts their appolntments ,'riacse earlsrare cancelied. •" 4. In view of the weii settled principies of iaw, this ,petiSion stands disocse' of in terms of Ku. Puna.m (supra). Consequentiy, M.iW) P. No.65f'2006 stands dlsposed of- ^^ow Satis^^. 3ud6e