IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 56 OF 2008 MRS. AGNES D'SILVA ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 4 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Amrut Kansar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Government Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. P. A. Kamat, Advocate for respondent No.4. Mr. A. D. Bhobe, Advocate for respondent No.5. Coram:- S.A. BOBDE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 23rd April, 2008 P.C. The petitioner has challenged the action of respondent No.2 in permitting respondent No.5 to locate a shack at a particular place. Mr. Rivonkar rightly relies on clause 24 of the policy, which reads as under : "24. The Department reserves the right to make adjustment as regards to demarcation of shacks depending upon the site condition/availability of space." There is, therefore, no merit in the contention of the petitioner. We are not inclined to entertain this writ petition, which is hereby dismissed. S.A. BOBDE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. ssm.