1 CA-2568.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2568 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra .... Applicant Vs. Vinayak Nanasaheb Mohite & Ors. .... Respondents Ms S.D. Shinde, APP, for the State. S/Shri A.N. Pathan h/f Rishi Bhuta for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri Sachin Chandan for Respondent No.3. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: SEPTEMBER 03, 2010 P.C: This is an application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune to the respondents herein. One of the three respondents is supposed to be the writer of PI Vijay Bhosale and the other two were his assistants. One Aruna Kale was arrested in an offence of dacoity on 2-1-2007. She was in the custody of Bhosale till 5-1-2007. On 5-1-2007 she was examined by a Medical Officer who had found some contusions and abrasions on her 2 CA-2568.10 person, inflicted within 72 hours of the examination, that is possibly during the time the said Aruna was in the custody of Bhosale. From 5-1-2007 to 7-1-2007 Aruna was in the custody of one Ms Bankar, Deputy Superintendent of Police. On 7-1-2007 her custody was transferred to one PSI Takne. On 8-1-2007 the victim was found to have committed suicide by hanging herself in the lock-up. Offences punishable under Sections 306 and 330 of IPC were registered against Bhosale and the present three respondents on the allegation that Bhosale and the three respondents had beaten the said Aruna Kale which drove her to commit suicide. The gap between the cessation of custody by Bhosale and the suicide by Aruna Kale is eloquent. Considering this, it cannot be said that the learned Additional Sessions Judge erred in admitting the three respondents to anticipatory bail. All the same, the learned Judge should have directed that the original applicants/respondents herein should report before the investigating officer for the purpose of investigation. The learned counsel for the respondents state that they would instruct their clients to appear before the investigating officer. The learned APP states that the respondents may be directed to appear 3 CA-2568.10 before the investigating officer on every Monday and Thursday at 10:00 a.m. till the charge-sheet is filed. In view of this, the application is rejected. The order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge is modified and the respondents are directed to appear before the investigating officer on every Monday and Thursday at 10:00 a.m. till the charge-sheet is filed. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)