THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20571 of 2007 Dated 10th February, 2011 Between: Ghantasala China Venkateswara Rao …Petitioner And Sree Ramalingeswara Large Seized Cooperative Society Ltd., rep.by its Secretary, Goguntha Village, Pedapadu Mandal, West Godavari and another …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri B.P.Raju Counsel for respondent No.1: Smt.Bobba Vijaya Lakshmi Counsel for respondent No.2: GP for Agriculture The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in conduct public auction scheduled to be held on 04.10.2007 in respect of land to an extent of Ac.4.00 covered by R.S.No.429, situated in Satyavolu Village of Pedapadu Mandal, West Godavari District, without issuing any notice or without giving any opportunity to the petitioner herein, as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to set aside the proposed public auction dated 04.10.2007 and to call for records in respect of the loan account.” At the hearing, Smt.Bobba Vijaya Lakshmi, learned counsel representing respondent No.1, stated that as the petitioner has repaid the entire loan amount on 26.12.2009, respondent No.1 has returned all the documents deposited by the petitioner towards security for repayment of the loan and that therefore, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. The learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed this submission. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.26605 of 2007 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 10th February, 2011 VGB