IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.3791 OF 200 CRI.APPLICATION NO.3791 OF 200 CRI.APPLICATION NO.3791 OF 2007 Rajarshri Radhakrishna Dwivedi.. Applicant. Vs The State of Maharashtra, ... Respondent. Mr. P.R.Arjunwadkar,for the applicant. Ms Gauri Banerjee-original complainant present in-person. Mr J.P.Yagnik, APP, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 23/4/200 DATE : 23/4/200 DATE : 23/4/2009 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Mr Arjunwadkar, learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, submits that since transfer order of the concerned Judge, has already been issued, he has instructions not to press the application, and he seeks direction to the trial Court to proceed with the case. In view of the statement of Mr Arjunwadkar, this application is disposed of as not pressed. Rule is discharged. The trial court shall, however, proceed with the case in accordance with law only after 10.6.2009. 3. At this stage, Ms Gauri Banerjee, the complainant-in-person, who is present in the court, submits that the accused does not remain present on the date/s of hearing before the trail Court and, therefore, an appropriate directions be issued to the applicant-accused. In my opinion, such directions need not be issued, since it is always open to the trial court to pass appropriate orders if the accused deliberately remains absent on the date/s of hearing of the case. . The application is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)