1611wp3776.11.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 3776 of 2011 (Madhuri Bapuraoji Uddar .vs. The C.E.O., Z.P., Yavatmal and anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: D. D. Sinha and A. P. Bhangale, JJ. Date : 16/11/2011. Heard Mr.A.S.Dhore, Adv. for petitioner, Mr.J.Y.Ghurde, Adv. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Mr.D.P.Thakare, A.G.P. for respondent no.3. This Writ Petition is directed against the order of transfer dated 31st May, 2011 issued by respondent no.1 whereby the petitioner, who is Assistant teacher, came to be transferred from the Primary School at Ghatanji to Primary School at Maregaon. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that another teacher who was identically situated had filed Writ Petition No.3132 of 2011 against the order of transfer issued by respondent/Zilla Parishad which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 20th September, 2011 by observing thus : 1611wp3776.11.odt 2 “ It is not disputed that this matter is similar to the facts and circumstances of the Writ Petition No.3389 of 2011, decided on 24th August, 2011. Hence, the instant Writ Petition is liable to be disposed of with following directions : (I) If the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati finds any irregularity or illegality, he should rectify the same if necessary by resorting the petitioner to his former position. (ii) The Divisional Commissioner, Amravati is directed to decide all the issues within a period of one month from today. He shall pass a reasoned order after considering the grievance of the petitioner. (iii) The petitioner shall be entitled to make fresh representation within a period of one week from today and the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati shall decide the same within a period of one month after receiving such representation. “ Learned Counsel for the petitioner prays that present petition may also be 1611wp3776.11.odt 3 disposed of in terms of the above referred order. The learned A.G.P. has not disputed the factual and legal aspect of the matter including the fact that the petitioner in Writ Petition No.3132 of 2011 was similarly circumstanced. In the circumstances, we dispose of the matter in terms of order dt.20th September, 2011 passed by this Court whereby Writ Petition No.3132 of 2011 came to be disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE jais