1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7569 OF 2008 Dilip s/o Ramrao Yeshwantkar .. PETITIONER VERSUS Shri Shivaji Mofat Education Society Kandhar and others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.C. Yeramwar, Advocate holding for Mr. A.S. Golegaonkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.N. Jadhav, AGP for the State. Mr. M.V. Nagargoje, Advocate for respondent no. 5. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 16 th November, 2009 PER COURT : 1 Petitioner is challenging the order passed by the University and College Tribunal, Aurangabad on 29-11-2004 dismissing the appeal presented by the petitioner. Petitioner was employed by the respondent / institution as Junior Clerk for 1 year in the year 1995. According to the petitioner, he was continued thereafter for about seven years and thereafter his services came to be terminated by respondent / management without any valid reason. As such, petitioner has approached the tribunal by 2 presenting appeal. Tribunal after considering the rival contentions has recorded finding that initial appointment of the petitioner was itself for temporary duration i.e. for one year from 15-6-1995 to 15-5-1996. No orders of either making fresh appointment on the post or continuation on the post are placed on record by the petitioner before the tribunal. Tribunal recorded finding that appointment was not made by following procedure prescribed under the Code. Findings recorded by the tribunal are based on appreciation of evidence placed on record by the parties. Reasons recorded are reasonable and proper and as such no interference is called for in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of Constitution of India. Petition stands rejected summarily. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp7569.08.odt