(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 141 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 141 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 141 OF 2004 Chandrakant Nanasaheb Kadam ...Petitioner Versus Shri. Sunil Tatkare & Ors. ...Respondent ..... Mr. S.A. Sawant, counsel for Petitioner Mr. D.A. Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent No.4. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 16TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 16TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 16TH FEBRUARY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. The State Government has taken due steps against the erring Officers as well as the President of the Municipal Council and therefore, nothing further survives in this contempt petition. 2. Hence, the contempt petiton is rejected as infructuous.