IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14659 of 2010 SHAMSHAD @ LALO @ SHAMSHAD ALI, son of Late Khadim, resident of Gandhi Nagar, P.S. Gumla, District-Gumla (Jharkhand) ---Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.5.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged against the petitioner, who is apprehending his arrest in a police case, is under section 364-A of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated without any reasonable cause as would be appearing from the statement of the victim recorded under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, wherein the victim has stated to the effect that he had taken the money from the persons who are alleged to have kidnapped him and gone to the boss of the Company for whom he works for installing the mobile tower on their land. Neither the mobile tower was installed nor the money was returned. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused Mir Miraj was allowed anticipatory bail by this Court as per the order dated 22nd 2 of December, 2009 passed in Cr.Misc. No.43088 of 2009, as contained in Annexure 3. Learned counsel for the State is not in a position to refute the above submissions. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Jakkanpur P.S. Case No.107 of 2009 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)