??'v -, •*d. IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR *. M.C.C.No.a-U /2011 (SBl8 (FOR RESTORATION OF S.A.No.272 of 2008) ate ••Usc.; ABpUcants Appellants :1) Kamla Bai, aged about 44 years, Wd/o. Gore Lal Kashyap (Kurmi) :2) Siya Bai, aged about 27 years, Daughter of Late Gore Lal Kashyap (Kunni) -.••y/-'' /""' ^^ :3) ^•<-^'x^' Non-apj3licants Respondents Shiv Kumar, aged about 23 years, S/o. Late Gore Lal Kashyap (Kurmi) :4) Harishanker, aged about 15 years, S/o. Gore Lal Kashyap (Kurmi) :5) Ku. Durgeshwari, aged about 12 years, D/o. Late Gore Lal Kashyap (Kurmi) Appellants/applicants No.4 and 5 minors through natural guardian raother Kamla Bai, aged about 44 years, Wd/o Gore Lal Kashyap (Kurmi) All R/o. ViUage Chorbhatti, Tahsil Nawagarh District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Versys ;1 Uma Bai, D/o. Hradey Ram Kashyap, (Kunni), aged about 59 years, R/o. Janjgir, Bazar Para, Ward No.12, Tahsil Janjgir, District .Janjgiy-Champa (C.G.) F>resently at Vilalge Taldewri, Post Semariya, Tahsil Chanipa, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) : 2) Suman @ Chhote Lal Kashyap, - aged aboi.it 39 years, S/o. Nanki - Kashyap, R/o. Semariya, at present Janjgir, Tahsil Janjgir, r T Dist-ict Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Presently at new Chandaniya Para, near Gayatri Mandi, Janjgir, Disti-ict Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESTOI?ATION OF S.A.No.272 of 2008 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION ^N 12/08/2010 ail^ii^lf^fw "(PTT 3iT^7 SDH {\^- <n»RWawra^ 3^ '^fPTRTT, ^^hm®,fsjdl-M^ ^........^:.L±...M..Ll.U... ^ ^ ^200 sn^r 'q^q? ('^f3?^8?) TOfIW^lftWCT^I Hon^ble ShrLPrashant Kum^r Mishra, J, 4.05.2011 Shri Parasmani Shriwas] Heard on I.A. No.l fd cbi'4f(r1^''l 'ITW?ff "^f 'fe^' •t.R'R^R ^affimsn^r counsel for the applicants. r condonation of delay in fUing the restoration application. For the reasons assign41 in application, this court is satisfied that the applicant has been a]ble to explain the delay in filing the restoration application. I.A. No.l for condonatid Also heard on applicati<j which was dismissed for wantl One due consideration >n ofdelay is allowed. ta for restoration ofS.A. No.272/2008, pfprosecution on 12/08/2010. and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, this MpC is allowed: The order dated 12/08/2pl0 is recaUed. S.A. No.272/2008 is resjtored to its original number. Sd/- prashantKumarMishra Judge