(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 8511 OF 2009 1. Smt. Gausiyabee w/o. Syed Azgar, .. Petitioners 2. Asiyabegum d/o. Syed Azgar. (Original plaintiffs) versus 1. Smt. Sugrabee, alleged to be wife of Syed Azgar, 2. Mahatma Phule Education Society, through its Secretary, .. Respondents Jintoor Road, Parbhani, (Original Taluka and District : Parbhani. defendants) .......................... Mr. S.V. Chandole, Advocate, holding for Mr. S.S. Chillarge, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. A.S. Bayas, Advocate, for respondent no.1. .......................... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 15TH DECEMBER 2009. (2) COURT'S ORDER : 1. By way of present petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 11th November 2009, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, below Exhibit 33 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 54/2004, thereby allowing the application filed by the respondents for production of document. The petitioners have also challenged the order dated 26th November 2009, below Exhibit 36, thereby allowing the respondents to adduce evidence by recalling the witness. 2. The learned Judge of the appellate court, after elaborate discussion, has found that the additional evidence, which is the death certificate of first husband of the defendant, was necessary for complete and effective adjudication of the dispute between the parties. 3. No perversity could be found with the approach adopted by the learned Judge of the appellate court, so as to warrant interference in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 4. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp8511