1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 4686 OF 2007 (Smt.Archana Prashant Ozarkar .v. Prashant Manohar Ozarkar) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri S.R. Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P. Lala, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. 05TH MARCH, 2008. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 15th June, 2007 vide which the application filed by the present petitioner under Section 24 for maintenance pendente lite and expenses of proceedings has been rejected. Perusal of the order impugned would reveal that the learned Family Court has found that even in spite of decree of conjugal right being passed and even after the notice is sent to the present petitioner by the respondent/husband to join his company, the petitioner has not responded. The learned Family Court has also found that the contentions of the petitioner that the letter was sent to the respondent containing therein that 2 though the petitioner had gone to the house of the respondent, he did not permit her to enter the house, not to be reliable inasmuch as no notice was sent in that regard. In that view of the matter, no perversity is found in the approach adopted by the learned family Court so as to warrant any interference of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petition stands dismissed as such. JUDGE *rrg.