IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6643 of 2010 1. RAJNISHA KUMARI, W/O SARVESH KUMAR @ RAKESH, R/O VILLAGE-YADUPATTI SIMARI, P.S.- PUPRI, DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE SECRETARY, null PRIMARY AND ADULT EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR,PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SITAMARHI. 4. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, SITAMARHI. 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION,SITAMARHI. 6. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, SITAMARHI. 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER CHORAUT, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI. 8. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER CHORAUT DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. 9. PANCHAYAT TEACHER APPOINTMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. 10. THE MUKHIYA, YADDU PALTI SIMARA GRAM PANCHAYAT P.S.- PUPRI DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. 11. THE PANCHAYAT SACHIV, YADDU PALTI GRAM PANCHAYAT P.S.- PUPRI DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. 12. ARCHANA KUMARI, D/O SRI SATENDRA KUMAR PANDIT, R/O VILLAGE-YADUPATTI , P.S.- PUPRI, DISTRICT-SITAMARHI. ----------- 2 13/01/2011 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State, there is neither any infirmity in the order contained in annexure-4 passed by the Block Development Officer in view of the findings recorded therein nor has the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority committed any error by rejecting his claim on the ground that since the Block - 2 - Development Officer, who was the competent authority to decide the lis, has already decided the issue, there was no occasion for the Appellate Authority to re-look into the matter. It is only a fishy kind of writ application and has now been filed without any legal infirmity existing therein in the two orders. This writ application has no merit. It is dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)