IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Rev. (T) No. 101 of 2008. Decided on: 29th October, 2010. State of H.P. and Others. ….Petitioners. -Versus- Ram Krishan. .…Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. P. M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the respondent. : Mr. Himmet Negi, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): C.M.P.(T) No. 3059 of 2008. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed. The delay in filing the review petition is condoned. C. Review (T) No. 101 of 2008. Mr. P.M. Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General has failed to point out any error apparent on the face of record. Consequently, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 29, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?