1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.175 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1209 OF 2007 Ashok K. Inamdar and another ..Petitioners. Vs. K.H. Rangnath and others ..Respondents. .... Mr. V.B. Tiwari i/b V. B. Tiwari & Co. for the Petitioners. Mr. Mihir Desai for Respondents 1 and 2. Mr. B.V. Phadnis for Respondents 6 to 8. Mr. A.L. Gore for the Applicant in Notice of Motion. .... CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 24th March, 2009. P.C. : We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the non-applicant raises a preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of the present application on the ground that the Petitioners can challenge it by filing a substantive writ petition and even that too after the final order is passed. We find substance in this submission. However, on the contention of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, we direct 2 that the two witnesses who were not cross examined by the Petitioners may be produced for cross examination on the next date of hearing and in the event that the Petitioners or their representative fails to cross examine, it will be presumed that the Petitioners do not wish to cross examine the said witnesses. The enquiry to be completed within the time fixed by this Court. The Motion is disposed of and we make it clear that no application will be entertained in this Court in relation to the enquiry which is being conducted. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.