IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM MONDAY, THE 31ST OCTOBER 2011 / 9TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 12873 of 2011(H) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- K.A.VINCENT @ WILSON, S/O.ALEX,AGED 56 YEARS, PROPRIETOR,M/S.DANFOSS ELECTRO MAG, ALOOR, TRICHUR. BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM JOHN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. BINOY, S/O. NOT KNOWN,AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, M/S.CYBER CARE, ANUGRAHA COMPLEX, KODAKARA, TRICHUR - 680 684. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KODAKARA POLICE STATION, TRICHUR - 680 684. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AYYANTHOLE, TRICHUR - 680 684. R1 BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO, R2 & R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.12873/2011-H: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE RENTAL AGREEMENT OF THE PREMISES. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE ORDER FORM DT. 24/02/2011. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE PURCHASE ORDER DTD. 11/03/2011. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE CREDIT NOTE DTD. 31/03/2011. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD. 06/04/2011 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO THE R.3. REQUESTING FOR POLICE PROTECTION DTD. 19/04/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.R1.A: COPY OF THE NEWS APPEARED IN MALAYALA MANORAMA DALY DTD. 28/04/2011. EXT.R1.B: COPY OF THE REPORT ISSUED FROM SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THRISSUR. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Prv. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 12873 OF 2011 ------------------------ Dated this the 31st day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT Abdul Rehim, J. Heard counsel appearing on both sides. We notice the interim order passed by this court on 17/5/2011. This court recorded submissions made on behalf of the first respondent that no physical obstruction will be caused to the petitioner or to his business. On that basis this court made it clear that if there is any obstruction, it is open to the petitioner to file appropriate complaint before the police, who will take steps in accordance with law. 2. It is submitted on behalf of the first respondent by the learned Government Pleader that, various criminal cases have been registered against the petitioner which are pending investigation. We notice that in the interim order itself, this court made clear that the order will not stand in the way of continuing with the investigation of the crimes registered. 3. We therefore dispose of this writ petition making it clear that the police authorities will be at liberty to continue the WPC.No.12873/2011 2 investigation of the criminal cases registered against the petitioner and to file final report at the earliest possible. However, the interim order with respect to the alleged physical obstruction will continue. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE. dpk