IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.16391 of 2010 Date of Decision : September 14, 2010. Bhajnik Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Gurjinder Singh Chahal, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner was appointed as Education Service Provider in English. He alleges that vide the impugned order 30.8.2010 (Annexure P- 3), he has been re-designated as English Master Trainer. The petitioner's case is that he does not possess the requisite qualification to train the English Masters. However, from the impugned order dated 30.8.2010, it is very difficult to infer that the petitioner has been asked to train the English Masters, though such a grievance has been expressed by the petitioner in his representation dated 3.9.2010 (Annexure P-4) also but without any response thereto. In these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider and redress the grievance of the C.W.P.No .16391 of 2010 2 petitioner, as contained in the afore-mentioned representation dated 3.9.2010 (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law/Government policy, as early as possible but not later than one month from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. September 14, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE