IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31693 of 2008 LADDU ANSARI @ IMRAN ANSARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.8.08 Heard. In such cases usual practice is to direct the petitioner or petitioners to approach the lower court with a fresh prayer for bail because the court could get the true picture from the court below as regards the pendency of the trial but after having perused the annexed copies of the depositions of as many as six witnesses which includes the informant’s deposition as well, I do not have any reason to dismiss the submission that the court below is awaiting to record the depositions of two official witnesses, namely, the doctor and the investigating officer. The trial is being under-taken by F.T.C-III, Rohtas at Sasaram(Chenari P.S.Case No.57 of 2006) and I believe that the learned Judge presiding over that particular court could be aware of the instructions issued by this court that in case of the witnesses going hostile there is no need to examine the official witnesses and the court could deliver the judgement. I direct the court below to act accordingly. Petition is dismissed with the above directions. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )