IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6389 of 2007 Date of Decision: July 07, 2007 Rajeshwar Parsad ...........Petitioner Versus M/s Krishna Charitable Trust ..........Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mrs.Justice Sabina Present: Mr.Neeraj Kumar,Advocate,for the petitioner. Mr.Pardeep P. Chahar, Advocate for respondent -- Sabina, J. (oral) This revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India whereby petitioner has sought quashing of impugned order dated 5.11.2007 (Annexure P1) passed by the Labour Court Rohtak dismissing his application for additional evidence. Petitioner has filed an application under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 seeking . During the pendency of the said application, petitioner moved an application for permission to produce on record certain documents by way of additional evidence. Vide the impugned order dated 5.11.2007, the said application was dismissed. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the opinion that the present petition deserves to be allowed. Admittedly, the documents now sought to be produced were attached with the application seeking permission to produce them on record Civil Revision No.6389 of 2007 -2- by way of additional evidence. In these circumstances, it cannot be said that in case application for permission to lead additional evidence had been allowed it would delay the proceedings. The petitioner only wants to produce on record certain appointment letters and other letters and receipt issued by the respondent. By allowing the application, petitioner would get an opportunity to present his case more effectively. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 5.11.2007 (Annexure P1) is set aside and consequently the application dated 20.9.2007 filed by the petitioner to lead additional evidence is allowed. ( Sabina ) Judge July 07, 2009 arya