IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1855 of 2008 LALIT KUMAR PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ---------- 2. 06.01.2010 After going through the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party no.2, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the majority of the grievances of the petitioner have been redressed. However, he submits that some minor grievance still subsists for which petitioner will file a fresh representation before the concerned authority. So far as this contempt application is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner does not intend to press the same. The contempt application is dismissed as not pressed. However, the representation of the petitioner for subsisting claims shall be considered by the authority concerned in accordance with law and appropriate orders shall be passed thereon as expeditiously as possible. B.T (J. N. Singh, J.)