1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9032 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 17433 OF 2010 Subhash Ramu Rajput .. Applicant Versus Dadasaheb Gangadhar Taskar and others .. Respondents Shri Rahul A. Tambe, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri A. S. Deshpande, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 15TH OCTOBER, 2010. PER COURT : . This is an application for seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal against the award passed by the Tribunal. The applicant is original claimant. The reason stated by the applicant is that the applicant is coming from economically backward family and he has to look after the whole family. He has to incur expenses for medical bill and could not arrange for 2 necessary funds. 2. Shri Deshpande, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 vehemently opposes the application saying that the reasons stated could not spel out sufficient cause. However, taking into account the nature of the claim and the fact that the applicant is not going to gain by causing any delay, the delay is condoned. The civil application is allowed and disposed of. [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/Oct. 10