IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR W.P. No.'_S>2<»4 /2005 PETITIONER •i'\' Ajay Kuniar Shrivastava, S/o. Shri Nand Kishor& Shrivastava, Aged about 41 years, Asisstant PrQfcasor^ GQvemBieiit Degcee CoUege Raxntola, District Rajnandgaon, R/o. Patel Ward No. 15, Post Dongargarh, Distt.Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1; . State of Chhattisgarh, Thr&ugh fhe Seeretary, Higher Education Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan^ Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner Higher Education Direct&rate, Govemment Scienee Cotlege Pretaises, Raipur. <^€^€^ •^' F'resident PubUc Service i, 0£Be&atRaipur. 4^ Prineipat Goverrunent Degree CoHege, Raiatola, Distriet Rajnaxidga&n (C.6.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/ GERTIQRARL ETC. QR DIRECTION / ORDER IN THE LIKE NATUREETC. DETAILS QF THE PETmON lE'he petitioner most humbly begs to submits as under :- ^ vs XI-HC-78 ycq-^a<4irt«,t)>Ti1'(i<|<«,Rlril'<-ty<< *11HeM^*Tf^ -S2.0<^ /O^ 3T[^?Tira^('jc|fje|^) w^soo sii^CTwR-ii* B2IT3II^?Td>*f Shri Rajesh Ranjan Sia Shri Arun • Sao, Dy. respondent Nos.1,2 & 4 on ad IA No.9067/2005 This is an application taken up on Board. This inte: W.P.No.5204/3005 |.a, counsel fcr the petitiouer. Govt. Advocate, who appears for Taiice copy. Ifor urgent hearing. The inatter is ifiTn appUcation stands disposed of. Heard. Leamed counsel for petitioner was appointed as 08/11/1989. He furfher si| petitioner have been promot^ petitioner has not been proini^ is not beiag cousidered. Learued coiuisel for thd this petition inay be disposec^ ffle a detalled representati.on| fhe concemed authority m| representation withm. the stip| This lunited prayer petitioneris notopposed by The prayer is aUowed. It is directed that if sk detailed representation along4 Writ Petition before fhe concji 'piote'il'i iitnl"tffe'^1 'iRt<-gl'< ^3l)^TSII^?f ; fhe petitioner subinits that fhe ^ssistant Professor in Coinnierce on binits fhat persons junior to the ;d by the State authorities, but'fhe )ted, as such, his case for proinotion petitioner gi-ays that for the present, w ofwith a liberty to fhe petitioner to before the Gonceriied 'atethoritv and DE^ay be directed to dispose df his ilated period granted by this Coiut. lade by leanied counsel for fhe 14amed counsel for fhe State. advised, the petitioner inay file a dttt a copy ofthis order and a copy of :med auftiorily within a ]3eriod of 4 '^s, XI-HC-78 ll*«-»l%1Tg» idCT|^|«ICiq,U>-(i1<H<l<?,firt!'My'i .b^1p.^:2^°A/a>... 3n^9Tq^P(^fgg5) ^R^200 1-AJ SII^CT'FF.ft-litt) ?raiaii^?irt>ii<t> p° /< £ s» ^l^ weeks from today and if ooncenied'aufhority shaU dis: ;prefera.bly wifhin a period of£ iptffhe aforqsaid representati.0] With tfae above observa fiaatly'disposed ofat this stag Consequently, MfW)P N< C.C. as per rules. ^uch a representation is filed, the pose offlie same as eariy as possible weeks from the date offiling/receipt: by hun. i^ions/directions, this petition stands ).4211/2005 stands disposed of. Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge 'RlflfoAl *<!*<C»TffK^Q •(luK-Cff ^grf^Han^sf "K 'i^ avi '-»-.. 1