1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.517 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2925 OF 2010 Sanjeevkumar P. Singh ...Applicant. v/s. Umashankar B. Yadav and Anr. ...Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4434 OF 2010 Sanjeevkumar P. Singh ...Applicant. v/s. Shivshankar G. Yadav and Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Surel S. Shah ,adv. For the Applicants. Mr. Nitin Sejpal, adv. For the Respondent No.1. Smt. P.P.Shinde, APP for the R.No.2. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : AUGUST 23 , 2011. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2 Earlier in Criminal Application No.2925 of 2010, anticipatory bail was granted to the respondent no.1 by the order dated 22nd July, 2010 in Crime No.151 of 2010. Later on, trial Court granted regular bail to the respondent in the same crime number. 3 This application was moved by the original complainant seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail as well as bail granted by the 2 trial Court on the ground that said bail was misused and the respondent/accused continued to create problems. 4 Now it is admitted that about subsequent events counter cases were registered. While against the applicants and some others, crime no.394 of 2010 was registered wherein after investigation, charge- sheet has been filed and they have been granted bail. Against the respondent no.1 and 10 others, crime no.395 of 2010 was registered. In all 11 accused persons including the respondent no.1 were arrested. After investigation, charge-sheet was filed. All these accused persons have been granted bail by the trial Court. In view of the fact that subsequent event pertains to the counter cases, it will not be desirable to cancel the anticipatory bail or bail granted to the respondents by the earlier orders. 5 Therefore, both these applications stand dismissed. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)