1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5130 OF 2010 [Yeduba Vitthal Pawar VERSUS The State of Maharashtra] Mr. M.A. Manjramkar, Advocate for the applicant Mr. D.V. Tele, A.P.P. for the respondent-State Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders P.C.:- 1. Heard learned Advocate. The applicant is named in the FIR. The applicant allegedly poured kerosene on the complainant's person for the reason that she refused to stay with him in the relevant night and there was a quarrel between them, and immediately he allegedly set her on fire. She was injured during the course of incident. 2. No prima facie case is made out to infer that arrest of the applicant is without any reason. Dismissed. The observations in this order be not considered elsewhere. Sd/- DT. : 15.12.2010 [V. R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp