IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Special Appeal No. 94 of 2009 Sri Azad Singh Saggoo. .……… Appellant Versus Addl. District Magistrate & another. ………. Respondents Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. J.P. Joshi, Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. V.K. GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the impugned Judgment, we feel satisfied that the learned Single Judge has rightly dismissed the Writ Petition on the ground of availability of an alternative remedy of filing a statutory appeal against the order impugned in the Writ Petition. Sub-section (2) of Section 12 of the U.P. Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979 clearly provides the statutory remedy of an appeal against an order passed under sub-section (1). The Special Appeal is dismissed in limine. (Dharam Veer, J.) (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 12.05.2009 12.05.2009 G