IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 18TH MARCH 2011 / 27TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 8593 of 2011(Y) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SAIDALAVI.M., S/O.ABDRURAHIMANKUTTY, AGED 49 YEARS, MANJAPPURATH HOUSE, CHERIYAMUNDAM (P.O), TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR. JACOB SEBASTIAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE AGRICULTURE OFFICER, CHERIYAMUNDA, CHERIYAMUNDA VILLAGE, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHERIYAMUNDA VILLAGE, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P (C) No. 8593 OF 2011 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 18th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is that, the property owned by the petitioner has been wrongly classified as 'wet land' in the revenue records, which according to him is a pacca 'dry land'. It is stated that the petitioner wants to convert the concerned property as fit for banana plantation. It is with this intent that Ext. P3 application was preferred by the petitioner before the District Collector, which is still to be acted upon and hence the petitioner is before this Court. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well, who brought it to the notice of this Court that, Ext. P3 application in fact has been preferred by the petitioner before the District Collector, despite which, District Collector has not been included in the party array. However, it is submitted that the competent authority, before whom the application is to be preferred, is none other than the first respondent. In the said circumstances, the petitioner is directed to file proper application before the first respondent for appropriate relief, within 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. On receipt of the same, the first respondent shall pass appropriate orders thereon, W.P. (C) No. 8593 of 2011 : 2 : after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of application as aforesaid. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petitioner before the first respondent for further steps. The Writ Petition is disposed of. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd