R.S.A No. 2194 of 2007 (O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M No.10308-C of 2009 and R.S.A No. 2194 of 2007 (O&M) Date of decision : October 26, 2009 Chander Bhan, ...... Appellant (s) v. State Bank of India ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. S.N.Yadav, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondent. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) C.M No.10308-C of 2009 As per the office report, counsel for the respondent was telephonically informed about today's date. No reply has been filed to the application. Consequently, for the reasons recorded, this application is allowed, the order dated 11.8.2009 is recalled, and the appeal is restored to its original number and stage. R.S.A No.2194 of 2007 R.S.A No. 2194 of 2007 (O&M) ::2:: This appeal has been filed against concurrent judgments of the Courts below decreeing the suit of the plaintiff/respondent for recovery of Rs.1,69,152/- along with interest @ 14% p.a with half yearly rests. The only argument of counsel for the appellant is that the interest @ 14% pa with half yearly rests is excessive. I, however, find that the interest has been levied on the basis of the contract between the parties. Even otherwise, this issue is not a question of law. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed with, however, no order as to costs. October 26, 2009 ( AJAY TEWARI ) kk JUDGE