1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.751 OF 2009 Ashok M.Patil .. Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondents. Mr.S.A.Pawar for the applicant. Mrs.S.D.Shinde A.P.P. for the State. Mr.Ganesh Gole for respondent nos.2 and 3. Coram: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 7TH JULY, 2009 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and respondent nos.2 and 3 and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The only ground on which the applicant has prayed for cancellation of bail is that the respondent-accused are likely to tamper with the evidence. Mr.Pawar, learned counsel for the applicant submits that neighbours of the applicant are witnesses in the case and, therefore, there is every possibility that he may bring pressure on the witnesses. I perused the application and other material placed on record so also the order passed by the Sessions Court dated 30.12.2008 by which the application for bail was allowed. Except the apprehension, as expressed by the learned counsel for the applicant, no 2 specific instance of having tampered with the evidence has been quoted/alleged by the applicant. There is no allegation that during pendency of this application any such attempt has been made by the applicant. In the circumstances the application is rejected. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)