IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 18TH MARCH 2011 / 27TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 13549 of 2009(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. RUGMINI BALAKRISHNAN, KUTIYANIKANDY HOUSE, P.O.MELUR, KOYILANDY. 2. A.M.P. MUHAMMED, MAVAKAVALEATH, KOYILANDY. 3. V.K.HAMEED, THYVALEPPIL, KOYILANDY. 4. V.V.K. MOHANDAS, PYARAGA, P.O.MOODADY. 5. K.SETHUMADHAVAN, SREYAS, MOKERI. 6. JAYACHANDRAN, MANANTHALA HOUSE, P.O.MELUR. 7. BHASKARAN, KORACHIPALLIL, P.O.PALAYAD. 8. SUJITH P.C., KORACHIPALLIL, P.O.PALAYAD. 9. K.K.SURA, BUILDING NO.18/497/A2, MUNICIPAL SHOPPING COMPLEX, KOYILANDY. 10. T.M.BAIJU, BUILDING NO.25/363 A-18/498/B 34, MUNICIPAL SHOPPING COMPLEX, KOYILANDY. 11. PERUMBIL VINOD, BUILDING NO.25/364-25/360 A, MUNICIPAL SHOPPING COMPLEX, KOYILANDY. 12. V.M.MOOSA, VADAKKE MANIYOD, ARAFA PHARMACY, KOYILANDY. /2/ 13. K.K.SREELATHA, MANKUDIKAVU HOUSE, KOYILANDY. 14. RAMESHAN, PUSHPALAYAM, PUTHIPANAM, VADAKARA. 15. KUTTI HASSAN HAJI, REJULA BOOK STALL, KOYILANDY. 16. KAMALAKSHY AMMA, BEAUTY PARLOUR, MUNICIPAL SHOPPING COMPLEX, KOYILANDY. 17. DR. K.P.MOHANAN, HOMEO MEDICALS, SHOPPING COMPLEX, KOYILANDY. 18. SAJEEVAN T., THARAL HOUSE, MUCHUKKUNNU. BY ADV. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KOYILANDY MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KOYILANDY. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAXES, KOZHIKODE RANGE OFFICE, C.R.BUILDING, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE-673 001. 3. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001. ADV. SRI.JOHN VARGHESE,SC,CEN.BOARD OF EXCIS FOR R2,R3 SC SRI. THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.13549 OF 2009(K) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of March, 2011 J U D G M E N T The writ petition was admitted on 12.5.2009 and stay was granted for a period of two months. Despite various opportunities granted, the petitioners have not got the service of notice on respondent No.2 complete and as a result of which the case is coming up today on the 4th occasion for curing defect. In view of the indifference of the petitioner, the writ Petition is dismissed for default. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/