IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28353 of 2008 ----- SATENDRA PRASAD GUPTA & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.7.2008 As prayed for, the learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Aurangabad (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.92 of 2006 for the alleged offences registered under section 323 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3/4 of the S.C. & S.T. Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners on perusal of the allegations made in the complaint, it would appear that the ingredient of the offence under the provisions of section 3/4 of the S.C. & S.T. Act is not attracted. Further the allegation of assault is also false. Considering the submissions as noticed above, it is directed that petitioners no.1, 2 and 3, namely, Satendra Prasad Gupta, Rakesh Kumar Baghel and Urmila Devi, respectively, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Aurangabad (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.92 of 2006 (G.R. No.1961/2006) , within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- 2 (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Aurangabad, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)