IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1196 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1196 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1196 OF 2006 Hasmatunbibi Nazeerkhan. ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Chief Executive Officer, SRA ] and 6 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. F.A. Mulla for the petitioner. Mr. J.G. Reddy for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. S.G. Surana for respondent No.3. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 19TH APRIL, 2006 P.C. : . From the record it appears that there was a structure bearing No.11 which has been allotted in favour of respondent No.6. Petitioner contends that he is entitled to another structure bearing No.11A and for that purpose, relies on the Affidavit of respondent No.6. There is no documentary evidence in support of the petitioner’s contention that there was a structure bearing No.11A. Both the authorities have considered the matter and have rejected the petitioner’s claim. : 2 : 2. We find no case for interference. Petition rejected. Sd/- [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]