IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI THURSDAY, THE 13TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 22ND KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 9668 of 2008(A) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- SHAMSUDHEEN, AGED 35 YEARS S/O.MUHAMMED KUNJU, KIZHAKKECHITTAYIL PANAVALLY VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI THANKAPPAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE POOCHAKKAL POLICE STATION, POOCHAKKAL, CHERTHALA. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHERTHALA. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHERTHALA. 4. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. SULAIMAN, S/O.MUHAMMED KUNJU KALAKKALSSERY HOUSE, KUMBALAM P.O., ERNAKULAM. 6. IBRAHIM, S/O.MUHAMMED KUNJU ABIDA MANZIL, KACHERIPPADY P.O. KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 7. NAZER, S/O.MUHAMMED KUNJU KIZHAKKECHITTAYIL, PANAVALLY P.O., CHERTHALA. BY SR.GOVT.PLEADER SHRI BENJAMIN PAUL FOR R1 TO R4 ADV. SRI.LIJU. M.P FOR R5 & 6 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.9668 OF 2008 A -------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 13th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2008 J U D G M E N T Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking police protection for his life. He submits, he apprehends danger to his life from the part of respondents 5 to 7, who are his brothers. 2. The learned counsel appearing for respondents 5 and 6 submitted that they have no intention whatsoever to physically harm the petitioner. 3. The learned Government Pleader upon instructions submitted that only an isolated incident happened in February,2008 and based on that a crime has been registered against the brothers of the petitioner for the offences punishable under sections 323 and 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code. Thereafter, there is no law and order problem or any threat to the life of the petitioner. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for respondents 5 and 6 and the learned Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE. dsn