1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25/11/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE.M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE.S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P.(MD)No.871 of 2011 Veera Chinnu ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur. 2. The Sub-Inspector of Police Velayuthampalayam Police Station Karur District. 3. Ilayaperumal ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body and person of the petitioner's daughter Pargavi aged 19 years before this Court and set her at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Siva Thilakar For respondents : Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor for R.R.1 and 2. ***** O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN,J] This Habeas Corpus petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to produce the detenue, namely, Pargavi aged about 19 years, before this Court and to set her at liberty. 2. The petitioner has stated that he is a 'daily coolie' worker. He had stated that his daughter, Pargavi, aged about 19 years, who had completed her Higher Secondary school, in Karur District, has been missing, from 3/4/2011. Therefore, he had made a complaint before the second respondent Police. However, as no effective steps had been taken by the second respondent to trace the detenue, the petitioner has come up with the present Habeas Corpus Petition. 3. The petitioner has further stated that the third respondent has been keeping the detenue in his illegal custody. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Therefore, he has prayed that this Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the detenue before this Court and to set her at liberty. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 has stated that the detenue had married the third respondent, on 11/7/2011. The said marriage had been registered before the Sub-Registrar, Aroor, in Dharmapuri District. They had approached the Aroor All Women Police Station, stating that they are married and they are living happily. 5. In view of the statements made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the first and the second respondents, and in view of the records placed before this Court, we are convinced, prima facie, that the detenue is not in the illegal custody of the third respondent, as alleged by the petitioner. 6. In such circumstances, no further orders are necessary in the present Habeas Corpus petition. Hence, this petition stands closed. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(Writs) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Karur District 2. The Sub-Inspector of Police Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai mvs rl/4 c- 2.1.2012 H.C.P.(MD) No.871 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/