C? Lgfmk BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT ‘OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (cmo. W/’% 12010 PETITIONERS 1. anjay Kumar S/o. Shri Sarwanand Meghani, aged about 30 years, 2. Sumit Kumar S/o. Rupchand Meghani, aged about 3O years, R/o. C’ivil Lines, Raipur (C.Gi) VERSUS Municipal Corporation, Raipur, Through- it’s Commissioner, District Raipur (C.G.) ’ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA. RESPONDENT /: I Afiwwyi‘i‘gm / S X7 v 7.: HIGH GOlRTn0E WHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 4412 of 2010 mmgmls_ . ¥ Sanjay Kumar 8: Amine: . . versus Respondent WRQT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF IHE CONSTITUTtON OF mam Mumcipal Corporation, Raipur. (SB : Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) " Present :-. Shri’Saurabh Dangi; Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate for the respondent. ORDER (Passed on 11 day cf August, 201 O) ‘ :»1 ; _ -, s v Learned counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation submits that there is no contemphtion for demolition of any structure, which “is duly iegai and authorised, in respect of the petitioners; without affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. / 2. Shri Agrawai further submits that no demolition in respect of the property in dispute shall be done without proper affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. 3. In view of foregoing, nothing!” remains in this petition for adiudtcation.’ Accordingly: the'petition is dismissed with the above- stated observation. No order astooosts. v ~t :»’ , Ashok