THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2237 OF 2008 DATED: 21-12-2010 Between: Shilpa Rani. ..... PETITIONER And Chungi Sarat Chandra. .....RESPONDENT ORDER: No representation on either side. The wife laid I.A.No.899 of 2007 before the learned Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad seeking interim maintenance at Rs.40,000/- per month and legal expenses at Rs.20,000/-. The learned Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad heard both sides and through the impugned order granted interim maintenance at Rs.10,000/- per month. But the order was silent regarding the legal expenses. In other words, the learned Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad dismissed the application so far as the legal expenses are concerned. The husband was described to be an I.T.professional working in Australia. Perhaps, it is the reason why the learned Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad granted interim maintenance at Rs.10,000/- per month. As already pointed out, neither the learned counsel for the petitioner nor the learned counsel for the respondent has appeared and represented the case. This revision, therefore, is dismissed for default. No costs. __________________ K.G.SHANKAR, J 21st December, 2010. Tsy