IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5386 of 2009 ALETUN KHATOON & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- Cr.Misc. No.6589 of 2009 JALALUDDIN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21.5.2009 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the State. Petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 5386 of 2009 are the mother- in-law and the wife of the brother of the husband,. while in Cr. Misc. No. 6589 of 2009 it is the father-in-law. They apprehend arrest in a police case under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the status of petitioner no.2 aforesaid in Cr. Misc. No. 5386 of 2009 as a daughter-in-law herself with generalized allegations, let petitioner no.2 aforesaid, surrender in the court below within four weeks from today, when she shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in Tedhagachh ( Terhagachh) P.S. case no. 55 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. In so far as the other petitioners are concerned, at this stage, whether the offence be one under sections 306 or 304B is hardly relevant. The application is rejected with regard to them. - 2 - Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioners shall be considered appropriately including the submission of their advanced age and any physical disability, without being prejudiced by the present order. (Navin Sinha,J.) A.Kumar