IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1019 OF 2009 IN STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 3540 OF 2009 MANAGING DIRECTOR, NORTH WEST KRTC ... Applicant Versus SMT. RADESHREE G. GAD AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Shivan Dessai, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. A. Pereira, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Coram:- A. S. OKA, J. Date:- 30th July, 2010 P.C. The learned Counsel appearing for the first Respondent had made a grievance on the earlier occasion that the Applicant has not complied with Award made under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant states that he has received a demand draft from the Applicant of an amount representing the amount payable to the first Respondent as per the Award under Section 140 of the said Act and the demand draft will be presented by him to the Registry of this Court. 2. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant. The application for condonation of delay is opposed by the first Respondent. In view of averments made in the application, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. However, the Applicant will have to pay the costs of Rs.1000/- to the first Respondent. Hence, the application is disposed of by passing the following order : O R D E R (A) The Registry will accept the demand draft if tendered by the Applicant towards the amount payable under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The amount deposited by the Applicant shall be permitted to be withdrawn by the first Respondent ( original claimant ). (B) The delay stands condoned. The Applicant will pay the costs of Rs.1000/- to the first Respondent within a period of four weeks from today. A. S. OKA, J. at*