1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.357 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.194 OF 1999 Ram Devidas Chittampalli .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.V.V.Purwant for the applicant. Ms.S.V.Gajare, A.P.P for the State. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATE : 16th July 2009. P.C.: . Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned A.P.P for the State. The prayer is for restoration of the Criminal Revision Application which was dismissed for non prosecution as the advocate for applicant was not present. The conviction of the applicant is for offence under section 498-A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code. The reasons are set out in this application for absence of the advocate for the applicant. The revision application was admitted for final hearing and the applicant was enlarged on bail. As a result of the dismissal of the revision application for non prosecution, the applicant has been taken in custody. 2. As the revision application was directed 2 against the order of conviction, a case for restoration is made out. 3. Hence, I pass the following order: : O R D E R : (a) Criminal Revision Application No.194 of 1999 is restored to the file. (b) The applicant shall be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.7,500/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. Liberty to furnish cash surety subject to condition of furnishing sureties within a period of four weeks from the date of release. (c) If R and P is sent back or is not called for, the same shall be again called for from the concerned Court. (d) The revision application shall be added to the final hearing board of revision applications to be notified for August 2009. (A.S.OKA, J)