IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CR No.3611 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.05.2011 G.S. Marwah . . .Petitioner Versus Ashok Kumar Chhabra . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Ms. Maninder Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against order dated 19.5.2011 passed by the Rent Controller, Panchkula by which he has allowed the application filed by the landlord for framing additional issue in respect of increase of rent by 5% per annum. The only objection raised before the Court below was that the application has been filed at a belated stage, therefore, the same could not have been allowed. The learned Rent Controller, however, observed that the landlord would not lead any further evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that neither the respondent/landlord is the owner nor this issue could have been framed at this belated stage. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order from which I have found that the impugned order is innocuous by which only the issue has been framed but no opportunity has been granted to the parties to lead evidence in this regard as the evidence which is already available on record would enure. Hence, I do not find any merit in the revision petition and as such the same is hereby dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MAY 30, 2011 JUDGE Vivek