In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 2917 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: August 12, 2009 Promila Sharma and another .. Petitioners Vs. The Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panchkula and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Arjun Katoch, Advocate for Mr. D.K. Singal, Advocate for the petitioners. A.N. Jindal, J Mr. Siddharth Batra, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents. Service is complete. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 6.4.2009 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Panchkula, whereby the evidence of the plaintiff- petitioner has been closed by order. From the record it transpires that two witnesses had appeared but could not be examined on the same date. However, on one date, when PW-1 could not come present, the evidence of the plaintiff was closed by order. That should not be the approach of the court. Consequently, this petition is accepted, the impugned order is set aside and the plaintiff is directed to conclude his evidence within three months positively from today subject to payment of Rs.3000/- as costs. August 12, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge