1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NOS.94/2009 & 93/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3379/2009. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 14 th July, 2009. . Heard learned Sr. Counsel and learned Counsel for the respective parties extensively. 2) While arguing the matter at the stage of review petition, this Court has been taken to the different maps, pleadings, orders and even directions issued by the revenue authorities. It is clarified, this Court is not called upon to advert to earlier disputes, controversies between the parties. A short point before this Court is, by virtue of order dated 5th of June, 2009 in the subject Writ Petition, the original respondent nos.1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 are deleted. However, this Court in paragraph 7 of the order under review, directed the learned Collector to act upon, while giving demarcation to the decree- holders/petitioners and the 2 tenant/respondent no.3, in the manner of the map drawn on 27.4.2001 by the Taluka Inspector of Land Records (T.I.L.R.), Latur. It affects the rights of the deleted respondent. It is clarified, since the deleted respondents were not before this Court, nor they were heard, the directions in paragraph no.7 to the learned Collector will not be running as against the deleted respondents. 3) Both the review petitions are disposed of in above terms. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/RA94.09