IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.9867 of 1991 Date of Decision.29.07.2011 Raj Singh, Peon, working at Branch Office, Sanpla and another .....Petitioners Versus Registrar, Cooperative Society, Haryana, 30-Bays Building, Sector 17, Chandigarh and another .....Respondents Present: Mr. C.R. Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Kirti Singh, DAG, Haryana. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioners have been regularized and the relief sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. The statement of the learned counsel is taken on record and the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 29, 2011 Pankaj*