1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R Atar Singh vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.1274/2007 under Sections 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 29.9.2007 passed by Shri Kedr Lal Gupta, RHJS, Addl. Sessions Judge(Fast Track) No.4, Bharatpur, Head Quarter Deeg in Sessions Case No.15 of 2005. Date of Order :::: 20.03.2009 Present HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BHANWAROO KHAN Mr. Nawab Ali for complainant Mrs.Rekha Madnani, P.P. Mr. Rajesh Sharma for accused-respondents Four persons namely; Jagdish, Gyan, Mohan and Bijjo faced trial for offence under Sections 323, 341, 324, 447 and 307 IPC before the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.4, Bharatpur Head quarter at Deeg and the learned trial court vide judgment dated 29.9.2007 while acquitting them of the charge under Sections 447 and 307/34 has convicted accused respondent Gyan Singh under Sections 324 and 323/34, accused respondents Bijjo, Mohan Singh and Jagdish for 2 offence under Sections 323 and 324/34 IPC and instead of sending them to jail extended benefit of Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act. Being aggrieved of the judgment of the learned trial court acquitting the accused respondents of the charge under Section 447 and 307/34 IPC and extending benefit of Probation of Offenders Act, the complainant has filed this revision petition. It is pertinent to mention here that against the judgment of acquittal of the accused respondents, State has filed S.B. Criminal Leave to Appeal No.322/2008 which has been dismissed by this Court by a separate judgment. For the reasons mentioned in the judgment passed in S.B.Criminal Leave to Appeal No.322/2008, I find no reason to interfere in the impugned judgment. The revision petition also stands dismissed. (Bhanwaroo Khan),J. bairwa