HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 6690 of2007 {32K\\\0W PETITIONERS 1.Balram Chakradhari S/o Pusu Chakradhari, aged about 36 years. 2.Kaliram Nishad S/o Chaitram Nishad, aged about 32 years. 3.Rama Velma S/o Fixtu Verma, aged 55 years, All Rfo Village Tulsi Post Office Damakheda, Tahsil Simga Distt. Raipur (CG). VERSUS . Stats of Chhattisgarh through:Secretary Department of Home, DKS Bhawan, Shashtri Chowk, Raipur (CG) Collector, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG). Superintendent ofPolice Raipur Distt Raipur (CG) Statlon House Omcer Police Statlon Simga, Dlstt Ralpur (CG) 5. Ram Khllawan Turkane aged about 45 years Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Tu1s1 R/o TulsL P S Sunga, Dlstt. Ra1pur (CG). 6. Avinash Das aged 44 yeaxs, Member of Nagar Panchayat, Simga, Distt. Rajpur (CG). 7. Bhagbali S/o Purushottam, Aged about 38 years, Occupation-Contractor, R/o Village Raweli, Tahsil Bemetara, Distt Durg (CG) RESPONDENTS : #wb) (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF mDlA) (SB Hon'ble Mr Salish K Agmhotn, J ) Present : Shri Sudhir Verma, Advocate for the petitionem Shri Vivek Shanna, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 13‘“ or November, 2007) The petitioner No. 3 alongwith others have also approached this court in Public Interest Litigation being W.P. (PIL) No. 433 1/07, apparently for the same relief, as sought for in this petition. The publiclrrterest Litigation was disposed on 13.09.2007 with certain ' directions. On query, as to where is the order passed in Public Interest Litigation Petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners expresses his inability to produce the same. It appears that the petitioners want to conceal the facts which had already been discussed and decided in Public Interest Litigation Petition. In view of foregoing, the second petition for the same relief is not maintainable. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sdl— Judge Sahu Satish K Agmhotri