Engieer in Chief PWD, Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipu‘r (C.G) Superintendent Engineer \ PWD, Durg Mandal Dist— Durg a /4. Executive Engineer PWD (B&R), Sub—Division Office, Khairagarh Dist— Rajnandgoan. (C.G) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT ORDER OF DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. n HIGH COvRT OF CHHATTIS$ARH: 3ILA$PUR SingEe Bach: Hen’bie 56w Safish K; Agniha’wi, JV. W. P. (5) No. iii? of 2067 Pe‘fi’i'ioriers : Sukhi Ram aw o‘fher's Versus Responéén‘i's : Sfafe éf Chha‘i'fisgarh (1M Sfhers Presarrf: MP. H.5. Ahiuwaiia, counsei {’or 'i‘ne pefi'fiomrs. Ms. Deepa!i Pandey, Pane! Lawyer fer The 51'a'!e/ respondenfs, ORDER (Passed 9%“. 27”“ Day 9f February, 2G07) q 1. Learned csunsel appearirig for“ ‘f'ne pe‘fifianers seeks permissitm of f'riis Cour‘r +0 wii’hdraw fhis pe'fh‘isrn in View a‘f The judgmen‘r end order da‘feci 4““ ’3anuary, 2007 passed +his Cour-1' in WP. No. 108/2G05 {Gevied Vs. Shi'e 6f Chha‘?fisgar‘h c3: afhers) arid efher con‘riecfed ma‘f'fers. a. Leemee counsei appeaei’ng for The pe‘i‘%fianers fur‘i‘her seeks peemisséori D‘f i’his Cam‘i’ +6 appreach 'i’he appmpr'ia'fe am‘horfry ii'l fhe Iighi’ of fee Govimi Vs. Siwfe of Chhaeisgarh & c‘f'ners (5upm). 2. I? is orderedaccordingly. 3. Thus, *khis wri'f pe+i+ion is dismissed as wi‘i'hcirawri wi'ih i'rie desve sia‘i’ed iiber-sy. No erder as is ees‘i’s. J Sdl- Satish K.Agnihatri i 5 Judge Subhnsh I 1 1 1 7