IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.925 of 2010 Shiv Kumar Singh S/O Late Jairam Mahto R/O Vill.- Chakrahi, P.S.- Bihiya, Distt.- Bhojpur ………….. Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary, Minor Irrigation Deptt., Sinchai Bhawan, Patna 2. Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation Deptt., Govt. Of Bihar, Sinchai Bhawan, Patna 3. Superintending Engineer, Tubewell Circle, Minor Irrigation Deptt., Ara 4. Executive Engineer, Tubewell Division, Ara 5. Accountant General, Bihar, Bir Chand Patel Path, Patna. ……………. Opp.Party ----------- 5. 06/07/2011 From the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party nos.1 to 4, it appears that the entitlement of the petitioner under different heads has been considered and revision in the pay scale has been made. In the reply of the petitioner, there is no specific denial. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the dues of the petitioner has been calculated but actual amount has not been released to him. In the circumstances, this Court finds that the orders of this Court have been substantially complied with by the opposite parties. This application is, therefore, dismissed. However, petitioner will be at liberty to raise his remaining grievances 2 before the authorities by filing a specific representation in that regard giving details of the same. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)