!N THE HSGH COURT OF JUD5CATURE AT BILASPUR. SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ. M.C.C.NQ. 594 OF 2006 PET3TIONERS k."i 111^ •\, 1. Jagjit Singh, S/o Ajeet Singh, Aged about 40 years, R/o Kaiiash Nagar, Rajnandgaon, Occupation-Liquor business of Rajnandgaon Tahsii, Dongargarh & Khairagarh Gandhi Group at Rajnandgaon. 2. Surendra Singh, S/o Late Buta Singh, Aged about 36 years, R/o Kaliash Nagar, Rajnandgaon, Occupation Llquor Business of Dhamtari Group at Raipur. 3. Harcharan Singh, S/o Ishwar Singh, Aged about 32 years, R/o Budhwaripara, Dongargarh Distt. Rajnandgaon Occupation Llquor Business of Baiod Gunderdehi Group at Durg (M.P.). 4. Ramesh Kumar Gupta, S/o Suresh Kumar Gupta, aged aboyt 28 years, R/o Ghaspura Distt. Khandwa, Occupation Liquor Business of Mohdapara group at Raipur (M.P.). 5. M/s Avneet Traders Rajnandgaon, Registered firm through S. Snder Pal Singh Bhatiya, aged about 45 years, S/o Late Amolak Singh, R/o Kaiiash Nagar, Rajnandgaon, Occupation-Liquor Business of Bllaigarh Group at Raipur. 6. Ratan Traders, Rajnandgaon, Partnership firm through the Partner S. Karne! Singh Bhatiya, S/o Late AmoSak Singh, aged about 45 years, R/o Kailash Nagar, Rajnandgaon, Occupation-Liquor Business of Sarangarh Group at Raigarh. Versus RESPONDENTS 1. Union of India through Secretary Ministry of Finance, North Block New Delhi. 2. State of Madhya Pradesh thrus the Secretary to the Govt. Commerce & Taxation Department, Vallabh Bhawan, BhopaE. 3. Commlssioner of Income Tax, Jabalpur. 4. Commissioner of M .P. Excise Gwaiior. 5. District Excise Officer, Rajnandgaon. 6. District Excise Officer, Durg. -^' ^ III II «^1 t^ 7. District Excise Officer, Raipur. 8. DEstrlct Excise Officer, Ralgarh. Present: Shri Ashish Shrivastava, learned counsei for the petitioners. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 6th October, 2006) En the light of the order passed by me today in M.C.C. No. 495 of 2006 and for the very same reasons setout by me in the above order, thls M.C.C. is ordered as prayed for, however, subject to the appiicants paying cost quantified at Rs. 300/- to the Chhattisgarh High Court Legai Sen/ices CommEttee wlthin a period of fjfteen days from today. The costs shoutd be paid by the concerned leamed counsel wlthout seeklng reimbursement of the same from the parties. j Sd/- ChiefJustice