IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2962 of 2011 Sanjeet Kumar, son of Sri Rajendra Jha, resident of Village – Lagma, P S – Sonbarsa Raj, District - Saharsa Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate, Saharsa. 3. The District Development Commissioner, Saharsa. 4. The Block Development Officer, Sonbarsa Raj, District – Saharsa. ----------- 02. 6.7.2011 Petitioner was engaged as a Computer Operator by the respondent authorities on daily wage looking at the exigencies of the service. He has worked for couple of years and has been paid what he was entitled to. Now that respondents have decided not to take work from him, writ has been filed seeking direction upon the respondents not to remove him. Even if the assertion of the petitioner about his engagement in the year 2007 and his diligent working is accepted, what is his right for continuance in that capacity is not understood. It is not a case that the petitioner has been working from a decade or two in that capacity and some kind of consideration is required in his favour. Engagement of a person on daily wage is a prerogative of an employer depending on extra work or service exigency. In the above stated circumstance, there is no occasion to give any direction for continuation of the petitioner as a Computer Operator. If the petitioner has ability and competence, in the revolution which information technology is 2 facing in this country, he will surely find better avenues than sticking to the office of the subordinate authority. Writ is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)