IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16484 of 2011 Vijay Rai And Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 04/ 08.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners are languishing in jail custody since 2.2.2011 in a case initially, registered under section 302 and other minor sections of the IPC as well as 27 of the Arms Act but subsequently, as per submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, charge sheet has been submitted under section 364 of the IPC. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that omnibus allegation has been levelled against these petitioners and having similar allegation other accused persons have already been granted privilege of bail. It is further contended by him that petitioners had gone outside in connection with their livelihood and that was the reason they could not surrender before the court below in time. It is also contended by him that on the alleged date of the occurrence two persons were killed by the members of the prosecution party for which Mokama P.S. Case no. 113/2005 was registered and the present case is nothing but pressure tactics adopted by the informant of this case against the informant and one witness of Mokama P.S. Case no.113/2005. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners, Vijay Rai and Dhogal Rai @ Dharamvir Rai, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of the Assistant Sessions Judge I, Barh in Sessions Trial no. 195/2011 arising out of Mokama P.S. Case no. 114/2005. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)