( 1 ) wp2491.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2491 OF 2011 Shri Bhaskar s/o. Kashinath Narwade .. Petitioner Versus Shri Mohan s/o. Bhaurao Shinde .. Respondent Shri B.N. Palve, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 29.03.2011 P.C. :- 1. Heard Adv. Shri Palve for the petitioner. He states that the question whether to issue summons to the witnesses or to exhibit some documents was left to the Trial Court by this Court in Writ Petition No. 10571 of 2010. Hence, the petitioner thereafter moved application on 19.01.2011 at Exh. 75 for issuing summons to the witnesses and that has been rejected. He invited attention to orders of this Court dated 24th February, 2011 to contend that it is nothing but refusal to exercise jurisdiction. 2. The refusal by the Trial Court earlier to issue witness summons to the witnesses was questioned in Writ Petition No. 10571 of 2010. This Court on 24th November, ( 2 ) wp2491.11 2010, noted that the Trial Court has looked into all relevant aspects and then rejected that application. However, upon independent scrutiny, this Court found that the judgment and order in Regular Civil Suit No. 315 of 1990 was required to be taken on record, as question about it was put by the Counsel for the respondent to the witness. The direction was therefore given to the Trial Court to take its certified copy on record. But then as observed by this Court, question either to summon witness or to exhibit said document was entirely left to the Trial Court and it also found that to that extent, no interference was warranted. 2. It is therefore obvious that the grievance of the petitioner is already considered by this Court and rejected. 3. The Trial Court has correctly appreciated the position in the light of earlier orders of this Court. There is no jurisdictional error. Therefore, the petition is dismissed. [B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.] snk/2011/MAR11/wp2491.11