... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.163 OF 2004 Maruti Pandu Bhogan & Anr. ...Appellants Vs. Monappa Bhujang Karade & Ors. ...Respondents Shri G.N. Salunke for the Appellant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 20, 2006. : JULY 20, 2006. : JULY 20, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Appellants who are the original Plaintiff Nos.2 and 3. 2. Suit for perpetual injunction was filed claiming that the original Plaintiffs are in possession of area of 12 acres and 22 gunthas. The Trial Court found that the Plaintiffs were in possession of area of 6 acres on the eastern side out of land bearing survey No.99/4. The decree passed by the Trial Court has been confirmed by the Appellate Court. 3. The courts below have considered the revenue records filed by the parties. The courts below have considered that up to the year 1970-71 entries in revenue records in favour of the Plaintiffs showed ... 2 ... that they were in possession to the extent of 6 acres. After considering the subsequent mutation entries and order passed by the various authorities, findings of fact have been recorded against the Appellants. No interference is called for in the Second Appeal. Second Appeal is dismissed. No orders as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE