MC 2006/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BP KATAKEY Heard Ms Deka, learned counsel for the applicant, Dr. Lal, learned counsel appea ring for the respondent Nos. 1 to 14 as well as the learned standing counsel for the respondent Nos. 15 to 18. As agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties the application is taken up for consideration today itself. The grievance of the applicant, who was the respondent No. 5 in WP(C) No. 2837/2 011, in the present petition, is that as this Court on 8.6.2011 disposed of the said writ petition even without issuing any notice to the applicant who is the o wner of the property in question, he did not get the opportunity to contest the said proceeding. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that though by order dated 8.6.201 1 passed in the aforesaid writ petition the respondent ASEB was directed to cons ider the application that may be filed by the writ petitioners (respondent Nos. 1 to 14 in the present proceeding) for providing permanent electrical connection to the tenanted premises, in accordance with law as well as in accordance with the provisions of the relevant Regulations, in the event of filing the same, the respondent authority may provide the electrical connection to the tenanted prem ises even without hearing the present applicant and without taking into consider ation his objection. The learned counsel, therefore, submits that the ASEB may be directed not to pro vide the electrical connection to the respondent Nos. 1 to 14 of this proceeding without hearing and without considering the objection of the present applicant. Dr. Lal, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 14 in the present proceedi ng as well as the learned standing counsel appearing for the ASEB submit that th e applicant would definitely be heard before taking any decision in the applicat ion filed by the respondent Nos. 1 to 14 seeking permanent electrical connection . The learned standing counsel further submits that after consideration of the o bjection, if any, of the applicant, necessary orders in accordance with law woul d be passed. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions, the present petition is disposed of directing the respondent ASEB to consider the objection that may be filed by the present applicant within one week from today and to pass necessary order in the application filed by the present respondent Nos. 1 to 14 in accordance with law and in accordance with the Regulation in force. The application stands disposed of.