1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2894 OF 2009 Shri Firoz Ahmed Ansari & Anr. .. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.F.A. Ansari, petitioner in person present Ms.A.S.Pai, A.P.P. for the State CORAM : J. N. PATEL & A.A. SAYED, JJ DATE : 13TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C. : 1. The petitioner is a practising advocate of this court against whom offences under section 403, 404, 405, 408 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code are registered and charge sheet is filed before the Metropolitan Magistrate, 22nd Court at Andheri. 2. On going through the records and proceedings, we are of the view that in exercise of our writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, it will not be proper to intervene in the matter 2 particularly when the petitioner is an advocate and capable of defending himself. Further, it is the case of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in the case and no case is made out against him. It is to be noted that the application preferred by the petitioner advocate for seeking discharge has been already dismissed by the trial court and in revision by the Court of Sessions, Greater Mumbai. Therefore, it will be proper on his part to face the trial and prove his innocence. With this observation, petition is dismissed. ( J. N. Patel, J) (A.A. Sayed, J)