IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1671 of 2007 MOHAN PRASAD Versus SWAPAN MUKHERJEE & ORS ----------- 3 26.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. In the show cause which has been filed on behalf of the opposite parties the stand is that the payment of over time dues have been made to the petitioner in terms of the direction of the Court on the basis of the policy decision that an employee can get over time allowance for 50 hours in three months and not more than 150 hours in a year and the payment has been made accordingly. Petitioner says that his claim is many times more and has serious reservation about the application of the policy. If he is not satisfied it is open to him to do the needful. So far the contempt is concerned it is accordingly dropped. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)