IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRR No. 1151 of 2010 Dated: 29.04.2011 O.P. Pahuja ..Petitioner Versus State of UT., Chandigarh & Another ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. Gautam Kaile, Advocate for Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for U.T., Chandigarh. Mr. Anuj Kaura, Advocate for respondent No. 2. **** RITU BAHRI, J.(ORAL) This is a revision petition against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 09.04.2007 passed by Sh. Balwinder Kumar, Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chandigarh in a complaint case for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was dismissed on 19.04.2010 by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh. On 22.04.2010, learned counsel for the petitioner had stated that his client was ready to pay Rs. 1,50,000/-(Rupees One lac and Fifty Thousand only) in lieu of cheque amount of Rs. 74,000/- in the context of which proceedings U/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act had been initiated. Shri Anuj Kaura, Advocate has appeared for respondent No. 2 and on instructions from his client, states that he (respondent No. 2) has no objection if the revision petition is disposed of subject to payment of the CRR No. 1151 of 2010 -2- amount which is offered by the petitioner through bank draft towards full and final settlement for a sum of Rs. 1,50,000/-. The draft that the petitioner has brought today has been handed over to counsel for the respondent No. 2 in the Court. In view of the judgement of Supreme Court Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Baba Lal H. 2010 (2) RCR (Crl.) 851 that the matter has been duly compounded offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, this revision petition stands disposed of. (RITU BAHRI) 29.04.2011 JUDGE Poonam (II)