WP(C) 1307/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA. The petitioners are aggrieved by Annexure-6 order dated 10.2.2011, by which the y have been transferred to different offices/blocks. They are Grade-IV employee s. The writ petition was first entertained by order dated 7.3.2011 and the learned State counsel was requested to obtain instructions from the Respondent No.3. Th e matter was again listed on 14.3.2011, on which date also, the learned State co unsel was granted further one week time to obtain instructions. Time was again a llowed on 18.3.2011. Thereafter, again on 29.3.2011, time was allowed to this d ate. It is stated by Ms R. Chakraborty, learned State counsel that in spite of c ontacting the Respondent No.3, he has not responded. Ms R. Chakraborty, learned State counsel submits that the Respondent No.3 is in remote Char area discharging his election duties. Thus, it is not discernible in absence of any response from the respondents as to the cause of transfer of 6 (six) petitioners, who are Grade-IV employees. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Project Dir ector, D.R.D.A. Darrang, Mangaldoi (the Respondent No.3) to take on record the A nnexure-7 representation dated 14.2.2011 and dispose of the same by a speaking o rder taking into account all the relevant considerations. Let the representation be disposed of as expeditiously as possible, but at any rate, not later than 20 th April,2011. Till then, status quo as on today in respect of the impugned order of transfer s hall be maintained.