^^^; (^) SiLE S3EW ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S| N0. <§MS~ OF 2009 PETITIONER -^ :yf^/ 1/'>^^ .-•' 1 ;^^&^" ^^-ii^''r ^^cy^ <?>yx.:.;::;""-: "<^''"".;:'^:'.:; -•-^•11'-: -•:.,.- Subodh Kumar Mazumdar, son pf Shri G.N.Majumdar, aged about 53 yeaTS, working as Office Superintendent, Municipal Corporation, .&mbikapur, resident of ^Babupara^} ,, ^Am.bikapur, . Distt. Surgiija,(G.G) , . .." Vs. RESPONDENTS : ^l "S^»Gen^Sm- Bitaspur -2. State of GhKyttisgarh, through the Secretary, ^Department of Urbari- Admmistr'atiiM-i ^ancl Developmenf,. Maritralaya,..' ^"D'.K.S. Bhawein, Raipur.ChBattisgarh.. \ MunicipaIObt-poralion, Ara.bikapur, thrpugh ,.,^ ^i3he eoranlissioner, MuniGrRaE ©Qrgoralidn.,Ambikapur, Distt. Sur^uja, GhHattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICliE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF I^DIA aii^iwftaN? wsn ^^ ^>*i T '3^ -i<l<il<1';i, ®Tl|y'l<o,[sX'liyy ^.^t.:.Sr..^l.,...2ai.^.. ^^^-..^^.....>^...,..,^.-.^..^ ^QQ^ sii^T'^^ (1pf3^^) EWIIUT V^S CT^f SB : HON'BLE SHKI JUfeTICB PSITINKBR DIWAXER Shri Saajay K.Agiawal, c Shri Yashwant Singh Thlakur Govemiileiit Grievaace of the petiti.on( passed by the State been traasferred froia Munit Nagar Paachayat Chhura, Dis^rict Contention of counsel f(t the provisions of Section Corporatiou Act and rule 14 (AppoiutineD.t aud Conditio4s Servaats) Rules 2007, the trausferred froin Corporation subuiits that his case is dated 8th December 2006 pass| Counsel for the petitij permitted to withdraw tbe representation to respoadent reUeved froia his present plac^ cf>j^[d41'< rsy^i ^ 'fe^ <I^i^R ^aifin aii^i ounsel for the petitioaer. r. A.G. forthe State. er is to the order dated 29.6.2009 by which the petitioaer has ;ipal Corporation Anibikapur to ir the petitioner is that in view of ?8 (5) of th.e C.G. Muiucipal fhe C.O. Muiucipal Corporation of Service of Officers and of fhe petitioner cannot be to the Nagar Paachayat. He also arely covered wifh fhe judgment ;d in W.P. No.2606/2003. df seflvices squ^rely t>ner submits fhat he mav be j>etition with. liberty to malce a js?o. 1 aiid tili then he may not be ofposituig. Learaed counsel for ffce State Uas no obfection if a direction for decidiae fhe reprdsentatioD. is tuade. iSi.r-'aai, <s&i^ • '^ E'S'"*!, | ^' ..^' ^ 3))t?i'Wf<-)i'* wnv wwir tR*nq» '3%[ "4|A|i<n^,.yflly<i<o, (qoiyy i-^.......l-sl:..£:..C=Oi....%zi. ^I'TiPR ( Consideriag fh.e totalify] directed to raake & representati^n a period of 15 days from fhe d4te shall be decided by the aufhoilities -Beriod of30 days from. the datel ordfcr tt.e •(iiiirt'i)'! 'wwff'? 'fe^t tr«itci< of fhe fa.cts, fhe petitioner is to tfae respondeat No. 1 witbin of receipt of this order, which coacemed wifhiu a farther ofits receipt. directed that fhe' effect aad In fhe m.eanwhfle, it i^ operation of flie impugned P/1) sball remain. stayed tiB petitioner wul be aUowed to pj place ofposting. Witli fhe above observatifin, tlie petition stands disposed of. . dated 29.6.2009 (Auaexure - next date of hearmg aad the rform his duty in fh.e present Sd/- PritinkerDiwakar 7 Judge ••sf~ 'imFfti'^t'igsiRRiwnhmg—FS/95—i i/zoos—i,00,000. i^