:1: :1: :1: HIGH HIGH HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 9032 OF 2005. PETITION NO. 9032 OF 2005. PETITION NO. 9032 OF 2005. Narayan Deobu More and others. ..Petitioners. Versus. Sandeep Ramesh More and others. ..Respondents. --- Shri. A. R. Shaikh for the Petitioners. Shri. Arun H. Palekar for the respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.B.MHASE, J. S.B.MHASE, J. S.B.MHASE, J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 27, 2006. : MARCH 27, 2006. : MARCH 27, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners - Shri. A. R. Shaikh and learned counsel for the respondents - Shri. Arun H. Palekar. 2. This matter was heard on 18.3.2006. At that time, learned counsel for the petitioner had taken time to obtain instructions from the petitioners as to whether the petitioners are ready to deposit the amount of maintenance. Today, learned counsel reports that he is not having any instructions in this regard. Order under challenge is of grant of maintenance pending litigation. Admittedly, the suit is for partition and the joint family properties are in possession of the petitioners. :2: :2: :2: The respondents are wife and children of the deceased brother of the petitioners. Not coming forward with the amount of maintenance and even for partition of the properties show that the petitioners are simplicitor interested in protraction of the matter. No interference is called for. Petition is hereby rejected (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, J.) J.) J.)