Civil Revision No.3894 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.3894 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision:24.08.2009 M/s Lomac Steels and another .....Petitioners versus JCT Limited and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. Present: Mr.Anil Kshetarpal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Arvind Mittal, Advocate, for respondent No.1. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.(Oral) In this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the sole grievance of the defendant-petitioners is for quashing of orders dated 12.12.2008 (Annexure P-1) and 12.05.2009 (Annexure P-4) whereby the opportunity to cross-examine the witness of the plaintiff, was declined to them. This revision petition can be disposed of on the basis of consensus between the parties. Learned counsel for the defendant- petitioners submits that one Sh.Rajnish Datt, affidavit of whom has been filed on 16.10.2008 is required to be cross-examined by the defendant- petitioners which was declined vide the impugned orders. Learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent No.1 states that Sh.Rajnish Datt shall be produced on a date to be fixed by the trial Court Civil Revision No.3894 of 2009 2 for his cross-examination by the learned counsel for the defendant- petitioners. Learned counsel for the defendant-petitioners states that the petitioners shall cross-examine the said witness Sh.Rajnish Datt on a date to be fixed by the trial Court and make sincere efforts to conclude the cross-examination on that day. In case, cross-examination of the said witness is not concluded on that day, a direction be given to the trial Court to conclude the same on the following working day. In view of the above statement made by the learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent No.1, it is directed that Sh.Rajnish Datt shall be made available for cross-examination on the date to be fixed by the trial Court for this purpose and the defendant-petitioners shall conclude the cross-examination on the date so fixed. In case, cross-examination is not concluded on the said date, the case shall be adjourned to the following working day, for conclusion of the same. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. August 24, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) seema JUDGE