IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17989 of 2010 1. PINTU MIAN 2. PAPPU MIAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 15/06/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Considering the nature of allegations under Section- 420 of Indian Penal Code and 11 of the Gambling Act when they are alleged to have not been apprehended on the spot let the petitioners above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Patna City in connection with Khajekallan P.S. Case No.233/09 subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. If during the pendency of the present trial the petitioners are found doing activities of a similar nature, it shall clearly be considered as a misuse of the privilege of bail when the prosecution shall be at liberty to take steps accordingly before the court below itself with regard to the present bail. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)