IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI THURSDAY, THE 12TH JUNE 2008 / 22ND JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 17572 of 2008(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SHEELA ALIAS ROSA FRANKLIN, AGED 48 YRS, KURISINKAL HOUSE, PACHALAM, KOCHI. BY ADV. SRI.JEEMON K.ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM CIVIL STATION, KAKKANADU. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ERNAKULAM RURAL ALUVA. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLICE STATION, ALUVA. 4. ANIL KUMAR, SECRETARY, SREE MUKKOTTIL DEVASWAM, V.K.C.COLONY P.O., THEVAKKAL, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. P.D.SASI, PRESIDENT, SREE MUKKOTTIL DEVASWAM V.K.C.COLONY P.O., THEVAKKAL, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY SPECIAL GOVT. PLEADER SRI BENJAMIN PAUL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== W.P.(C)NO. 17572 OF 2008 ============================ DATED THIS THE 12th DAY OF JUNE 2008 JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair,J. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following relief: “a) to issue a writ of mandamus, or other appropriate writ or direction directing the respondents 2 and 3 to provide sufficient police protection for the life and property of the petitioner to peacefully possess and enjoy the Ext.P1 property and to enable the petitioner to construct a compound wall after fixing the boundaries of the property by the Taluk Surveyor.” 2. According to the petitioner, respondents 4 and 5 are causing obstruction to the survey of the property for the purpose of fixation of boundary, so that she can construct a compound wall. For the construction of the compound wall, the remedy of the petitioner lies before the competent civil court in view of the decisions of this Court in Ajayakumamr v. State of Kerala, WPC.17572/2008 -2- 2008(1)K.L.T.901 and Devadasan v. State of Kerala, 2005 (3)K.L.T.739. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the contentions of the petitioner and her right to move the competent civil court for appropriate reliefs. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE M.C. HARI RANI JUDGE ks. WPC.17572/2008 -3- K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== W.P.(C)NO. OF 2006 ============================ DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2008 JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair,J. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE M.C. HARI RANI JUDGE ks.