1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 567 of 2011 Sunil Sunder Kamat & Others .. Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.M.K.Kocharekar i/b. M/s. Rajeev Sawant & Associates for Applicant . Mr. Rahul R. Singhh i/b. Prabha Badadare for the Respondent No.2 Mrs.V.R.Bhosale, APP for the State CORAM:- R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED:- 12th JULY, 2011. P.C. 1. The applicant has filed this application praying that FIR No.59 of 2009 registered with Gamdevi Police Station be quashed and set aside. In the FIR it is alleged that the applicants have committed offence punishable under Section 442 , 448 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2 2. If the FIR is perused, it goes to show that the present applicant forcibly took possession of the flat , which according to the respondent no.2 was in his possession. The respondent no.2 has addressed a letter to the Senior Inspector of Police, Gamdevi Police Station, stating that the applicant and the respondent no.2 have settled their dispute. 3. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.2 submitted that the applicant and the respondent no.2 have settled their dispute and the respondent no.2 has no objectin in quashing the FIR. 4. Having gone through the papers and having noted the desire of the respondent no.2 to put an end to the matter, instead of carrying the FIR to its logical end, this Court finds it convenient to quash the FIR as the parties have dissolved their dispute. 5. In view of the above, I am inclined to allow the application. Hence following order is passed. 3 ORDER i) Application is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). ii) Bail bond of the applicant stands cancelled. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)