IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.17538 of 2011 Date of Decision: September 19, 2011 Rajesh Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Financial Commissioner, Haryana, Chandigarh & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Paramjit Singh Jammu, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner was one of the applicant for appointment to the post of Lambardar. After considering the claim, Collector appointed respondent No.4 as Lambardar. Petitioner filed an appeal against this order before the Commissioner, which was dismissed. Even the Financial Commissioner has dismissed the revision. The Financial Commissioner has heard both the counsel and after considering the arguments raised, has come to the conclusion that there was no illegality or arbitrariness involved in the choice exercised by the Collector. The claim of the petitioner that he owns more land than respondent No.4 would be belied from the fact that he does not own any land in the village where he is seeking appointment as Lambardar. There is not much difference in the educational qualification. Accordingly, no viable ground exists for interfering in the choice exercised by the Collector, which has been upheld by the Commissioner and the Financial Commissioner. Dismissed. September 19, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE