1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3646/2011 (PRAKASH JAGOBAJI SURAMWAR VERSUS MADHUKAR NAMDEO MANAPURE) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri D.A. Sonwane, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 23 , 2011 . Heard. By this petition, the petitioner impugns the interlocutory order passed by the first appellate Court on 03.03.2011 granting stay to the judgment and decree passed against the respondent-appellant on certain conditions. The order passed by the first appellate Court is extremely just and proper and does not suffer from any error whatsoever, much less, a jurisdictional error. In fact, the first appellate Court rightly considered the provisions of Order 41 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure and granted stay in favour of the respondent on certain conditions. The stay of possession was rightly granted by the first appellate Court on the condition that the respondent-appellant deposited the costs of the suit and the decretal amount within a period of fifteen days from the date of the impugned order and also furnished security to the tune of Rupees Fifty Thousand within a period of One Month. Since the impugned order is extremely just and proper, the same calls for no interference in exercise of the writ jurisdiction. 2 In the result, the writ petition fails and is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE APTE