Crl. Misc. No.M-27256 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-27256 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 16, 2010 Parminder Kumar Bansal and others …..Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. Vikas Behl, Advocate for the petitioners. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Apprehending arrest on the basis of a complaint filed by respondent No.7, wife of petitioner No.1 on the allegations of demand of dowry and misappropriate of dowry articles, the petitioners have filed this petition under Section 438 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. submitting that respondent No.7 has field a complaint annexure P-2 before SSP, Bathinda and another complaint which is not to the knowledge of the petitioners at Mansa with an oblique motive to harass the petitioners. The attention has Crl. Misc. No.M-27256 of 2010 [2] been drawn to report annexure P-10 on her complaint, prepared by S.P., Bathinda, arriving at a conclusion that the allegations of dowry and misappropriation are false and that the husband (petitioner No.1) and their family members are ready to compromise the matter but she is reluctant to return back to her matrimonial home. The relief sought for by the petitioners could have been obtained by them by approaching the Sessions Court under Section 438 Cr.P.C. This petition is disposed of at this stage relegating the petitioners to avail the remedy under Section 438 Cr.P.C. by filing a similar petition before the Sessions Court by September 30, 2010. Petitioners, however, will not be arrested till September 30, 2010 in any case registered at the instance of respondent No.7. September 16, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE