% 10-08-2005 Present: Mr. Sandeep Kumar for tiie petitioner. Mr. Anand Yadav for the applicants. Mr. J N Gupta for the respondent no.l. Mr. Prakash Gautam, Advocate for RCS. -hWP(C) No. 1007/2002 ^ Tltis writ petitionhas been filed iiiipiignirigthe award passed by the A.rbitratoras well as. the appeal against said order having been dismissedby tlie Tribunal In view of role of Sita Ram Singhal, result of investigationpui'suantto the order passed by this Court and an inquiry conducted by tlie Crime Branch of Delhi Police fact of charge sheet having been filed against him, CFSL report obtained allegations that he siphoned of the money of the S(xiety and has received money in a clandestine manner and enrolled more members than the membej-sliip of 1^. the Societyall theseas]3ec.lshaveto ht considei'cdby the Arbitrator. The Edward passed by tlse Arbitiator was not on the basis of any documents produced by the Scciety, as tlie Society could not have produced the documents in view of the fac-ts stated above. Tlierefore, we set aside tlie impugned order as well as tJie awaj-d rendered by the aj*bit2-ator and direct tlie Registi'arCooperative Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified r r L o : 2 : WP(C) NO. 1007/2002 Sociely to appoint a qualified person with legal exjx-iience as an Arbitrator to dispose of the matter after giving due consideration of all tJie circiUiislaiices and relevant documents v/hich will be placed by the parties for consideration. Notliing said above v/ill constitute mi expression of opinion on the merit of contt^oversybetween the parties. Hie writ petition stai:ds disposed of witli above dhections. In viev/ of the interim order stands vacated, the application filed by Mr. Anand Yadav, counsel for the applicants stands disposed of. AUGUST 10, 2005 P. Viiendf Jain. J. Rekha iharnia, J.