IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15749 of 2001 1. Kamlesh Kumar Tiwary, son of Late Prahlad Tiwary, resident of Village Dalsagar, P.S. Buxar(I), District Buxar. 2. Rajendra Tiwary, son of Sri Suresh Tiwary, resident of Village Tiwaripur, P.S. Buxar (I), District Buxar. --------- Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Additional Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Director, Deshi Chikitsa, Government of Bihar, Patna. ---------- Respondents ----------- For the petitioners :- Mr. Awadhesh Kr. Mishra, Adv. Mr. Anand Kr. Mishra, Adv. Mr. Vijay Kumar, Adv. Mr. B.S. Mishra, Adv. For the State :- Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, Adv. 3 29.09.2010 Having heard Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for petitioners as with regard to the following prayer:- “1(a) The impugned order dated 16.12.2000 issued by Respondent No.2 be set- aside. (b) A writ of Mandamus be issued directing the Respondents to absorb/regularize the services of the petitioners on the Post of Laboratory Technician for which they are suitable and competent as they have been found suitable by the Managing Committee of the College at the time of their initial appointment. (c) Respondents be directed to provide all consequential and financial benefits to the petitioners.” 2 this Court is of the opinion that the issue raised in this writ application as with regard to the regularization of the services of the petitioners on the post of Laboratory Technician in Sri Dhanwantri Ayurvedic College, Buxar at Ahirauli, now, by judgment of learned single Judge dated 11.3.2005 in CWJC No. 10301 of 2003 and its analogous cases. Let it be noted that even this case vide an order dated 24.1.2002 was awaiting the disposal of the aforesaid batch cases and now when the learned single Judge has disposed of the matter by a judgment dated 11th of March, 2005, which stands affirmed by way of dismissal of LPA No. 1155 of 2005, all that can be held is that this case will also be governed by the direction given in the aforesaid judgment of the learned single Judge dated 11th of March, 2005 in CWJC No. 10301 of 2003 and its analogous cases. With the aforementioned observations, this application is disposed of. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)