1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1360 OF 2009 Kirti Ravi Jagne ..vs.. Shri Ravi Sukhdeo Jagne =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.S.S.Rao, Adv. for the applicant. Respondent absent despite service. C ORAM : Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J. DATED : 14th January, 2010. 1. This application is filed under Section 24 of C.P.Code for transfer of H.M.P.No.67 of 2009 filed by the respondent and pending before the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Daryapur to the court of Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Nagpur. Since the time of matrimonial dispute, the applicant-wife is staying with her father at Kamthi at Distt.Nagpur. On 24th June, 2008, she filed petition before the Judicial Magistrate (F.C) at Kamthi under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. being Misc.Cril.Appli.No.18 of 2008. After the notice of that application was served upon the respondent, he has filed an application for restitution of Conjugal Rights in the court at Daryapur. The applicant contends that she does not 2 have the means to attend to the court at Daryapur since she is housewife and requests for transfer of those proceedings to the court of competent jurisdiction at Nagpur. 2. The application is served upon the respondent. He is absent despite service. Considering the difficulties expressed by the applicant, which are not controverted by the respondent, the application is allowed in terms of paper clause (i). JUDGE. chute