RSA No. 2667 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No. 7888-C of 2009 in RSA No. 2667 of 2009 Date of Decision: July 20, 2009 State of Haryana and others ...... Appellants Versus Hari Singh ...... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. Madan Gupta, Senior DAG, Haryana for the appellants. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. CM No. 7888-C of 2009 For the reasons recorded in the application, the delay of 70 days in filing this appeal is condoned. CM stands disposed of. RSA No. 2667 of 2009 This appeal has been filed against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below decreeing the suit of the respondent for entitlement/enhancement of his pension. The following questions have been proposed:- i) Whether the judgment and decree passed by the learned Courts below is sustainable in the eyes of law? RSA No. 2667 of 2009 2 ii) Whether the judgment and decree passed by the learned Courts below is contrary to evidence,documentary as well as oral, produced on record? iii) Whether the plaintiff-respondent is entitled to get his pension revised at Rs. 4406/- per month? Learned counsel, however, has not been able to deny that the claim of the respondent was primarily decreed on the basis of the evidence of DW2 who had deposed as per record. In this view of the matter it has to be held that the questions proposed do not arise. Consequently this appeal is dismissed. No costs. Since the main case has been decided, all the CMs stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE July 20, 2009 sunita