^' c- /' it! ,r f& IN THE HIGH COTOtT OF CHH&TTISGARH_ AT BBLASS'UR. Wcit Petltion_E[p. ^->s^ _/2002. PSTITIONER ^;w ^s^" ^<'^-^.. '.-•".^T'^>.6:1^ «*e1' f.._-' v.^" ..r^*^ ^^ •••••"°' &'•°" w RESPONDENTS Ashok Kuaiar Kashyap s/o Late Bechu Ram, aged about 31 years, r/o Village Ramaaajganj, bistt. Surguja, C.G. V E R S U ^. ^ s y'1. The state of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, School Bdacat.i.on Department, Raipur,C.G. 2. DJ.rector, Public Bducation, Ctahattisgarh, Ra-tpur, C.G. 3. Dlstr-Lct Education Officer, Ramanajganj, Head Offlce Amblkapur, At/post Ambikapur, DjLstrict surguja, C.G. v,.-" WRTT PETOTION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OjF THE CONSTCTUTION OF INDIA. -" ^ ^. HIGH COURTOFJUNCATUREGHHATnSGAR»:BHASPUR SingleBench; Hon'bleEMtu'lSattsh K. Agniliota'i, J. W. P. No. 13S9 of3002 Petitioner Respondents Versus Astiok Kuinar Kashyap. TheState of Chhattisgarh & Ors. Shri A.K. Rrasad, couiisel for the petitioner. Shii Ajay Dwivedi; paael lamyer for the State/ respondents. I ' . ' ' ORAUORDBR (17th AprU, 2006) The petitioner happens to be the son of late Shri Bechu Ram, whQ died iu haraess pn 24,10.98. Late, Shri Beehu Ram was working as Head Master, Primaly Sc&ool, Kancllaiuiagar, Tetisil Rainaiiujgaxy, District Surguja, (C.G). The pgtitmaer is one'of the legal •heu-s of ]ate Shri Bechu Ram. Other legal lieirs are Smt. Chatai Devi (wife), Vijay Kuiiiar Kasliyap (soii), and Ku. RetEha (daughtei).| Thfi petitionfir inade an application on 16.6.99 (Aiuie^ P-1) ft>r appointinemt on; coiiipsussionate basis. jllte respOBderrts decluied the cpinpassionate appointHientilon varioys grounds. Beiag aggrieved, the petitjoner has fflfid tjhis ]pe|i(3fonj | seeking qiirashing bf fhe imipugned order idated j 14.5,|! ajad'fbsrcoinHiuiiiGatKin jnSioo^aated^ 2^ fartUer piayed litat fflte »espODdeQtsli':fa6 ^M^l @Bli! •^'^1;':H llili 4- "!• .^.L- consider the case of the petitbner to issue compassionate appoiutment order in his favour. 4. In a bateh of Diatters wherein, identical issue of coinpassionate appoiiitiaent was involved, this Courtby judgement and order dated 20.12.2005 observed as uader: "In view of the submissions inade by learrtGd couiisel appearfng for the parties, without expressing any opioion on the inerits of the Gase, in the opinion bf this Court, ends of justice will be served if a direction is givea to the State aid fhe authorities coacemed to eonsider aad decide the cases of the petitioners/depeiidants of the einployees who died on 1-11-1997 aadfhereafterin accordance with the poliey which was iii force at fhe time of death of the eiaplo^e. Each and evely individyal case wffl be decided and if the person fpund eUgible, appomtment orders wffl be issuedj as earfy as possible on or before 30t11 AprU,!M06.1 'Ette petitionere are also directed to render due feo- pperation to fhe authpnties. It is m^e etear|thajt|i£l any grievaru^ stiU remaius, fhe petrtaonelsiiiay a^aili the rexncdy availabte uruler the laro iucludiag ffil|nig; df thepetttion befiwe this Court." 5. The liespoadents tiavei clearly stated (hat;tlie suiularly situated p^tttioiiers will jbe |GQrisaI©reet decisionwillbe taken^ajbfflie Bai'tiest; J ! ease wsws •ii'SE .-BS S'|JNS siM In view of tUe foregouig, fhe present case is squarefy covered by the onler dated 20.12.2005 passed in W.P. No. 1336/2002 (Rakesh Kumar Dewaagan Vs. The State of Cfaliattisgarh & Ors.), and other connected inatteis, passed by this Court. The petition is accordingly disposed ofinvierooftheabpve stated facts. No orderas to costs. :sr sa'na ii'r Sd/- Satish K. Aghihotri Judge i.' \.''i^ l'iwn