:1: :1: :1: HIGH HIGH HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY FAMILY FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 84 OF COURT APPEAL NO. 84 OF COURT APPEAL NO. 84 OF 2005. 2005. 2005. Mukul Munish Gupta ..Appellant. Versus. Laxmi Munish Gupta. ..Respondent. --- Mr. Sanjay Krishnan i/b Singhania Legal Services for the appellants. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & S.R.SATHE S.R.SATHE S.R.SATHE JJ JJ JJ DATE: DATE: DATE: JULY 11, 2005. JULY 11, 2005. JULY 11, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Mr. Sanjay Krishnan i/b Singhania Legal Services for the appellant. Application Exhibit-33 was submitted by the appellant in Hindu Marriage Petition No. A-53/2002 stating that there is a decree-nisi in favour of the appellant passed by Hongkong Court on 4th April 2003 and it has become final on 28th May 2003. Therefore, the marriage petition may be dismissed. The court has considered the said application and rejected the interim application. The marriage petition is pending. No appeal as against the said order is provided in the Statute and apart from that decree which is tried to be relied upon is not certified under section 86 by a Competent authority and that cannot be executed and accepted in this court as an evidence. The matter is, thus, without any substance. It is hereby rejected. (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, J.) J.) J.)