THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.989 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner is a private limited company undertaking the activity of construction of buildings. It obtained permission from the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad, the respondent herein to make construction over the property bearing No.6-3-674/3, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, admeasuring 1093 square yards. The office of the respondent issued a notice dated 05.01.2011 requiring the petitioner to stop the construction and to submit the sanctioned plan and other relevant documents. The petitioner feels aggrieved by the same. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondent. This Court has taken serious exception to the manner in which the notice was issued. In fact, the concerned officials appeared before this Court and admitted their lapses. They have also tendered unconditional apology. In case, the petitioner has resorted to any deviations from the sanctioned plan, the officials of the respondent can certainly point out the same by notice under relevant provision of law. If the deviations are not corrected, the Corporation is conferred with the power to proceed further under Section 452 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short “the Act”) followed by notice under Section 636 of the Act. There was no justification for the authorities in issuing notice to the petitioner to submit the sanctioned plan and other documents. Hence, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned notice is set aside. It is, however, left open to the respondent to take necessary steps in accordance with law in case the petitioner is found to have deviated the sanctioned plan. No costs. L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt. 14.02.2011 lvl THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.989 of 2011 Dt. 14.02.2011