Oo aif M s '-a 'a iMf Ai5f^'^f s 2p '3 /yy V3 -01 a l^.I ^r- (^ ^ 4 '-~!'^S:''S!S^S&:: i:W:99 y'ss :,^^A^^^ ^ssiSfsasssKws^sasss WiES3SKK9WSSiUS '^^'•^'^S^iSSS Ig^glBffftffiggiSM vssSC ^Sji ^%i':KiVSi9W; ff'SWSSBSS iBBWwii'W'i'Sfgsig ^ s^^;^®^^^^ ^SlS ws/wsse ijiKii°ssa SeSSBB ;.^^^y^^'i^^:^^'%^^^?^%5i^®^i BsSSlBI VSiSSSSSSSViSiS^9 ESi93iSS'SS9SssSil9 1KS'^^'S^l"'? ^^s^':is^a;i^i1^!iI^^ ^sfk^ ite AiUn HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION IS) N0.2648/2005 PETmONER M.P.Rural Agricultural Development Officers Association Versus RESPONDENTS State of Madhya Pradesh and others (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K.Agnihotri. J.l Present: • None for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Pa^shi, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDERfORALl (Passed on diis 12"' day ofApril, 2010) 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behatf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. In view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner forthwith. SR