IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36754-2010 Date of decision:14.07.2011. Ripudaman Singh @ Nata ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Amandeep S. Manaise, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Rai, DAG, Punjab, for respondent No.1. Mr. Pankaj Satwalia, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) In this petition for quashing based upon compounding, the parties were directed to appear before the learned Trial Court to make a statement owning up the compromise (Annexure P-2). The report dated 21.02.2011 furnished by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gurdaspur is to the effect that the parties did appear before it and they voluntarily owned up the compromise (Annexure P-2) without any pressure or coercion. Thus, in view of the Full Bench decision of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and others, 2007(3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 1052 and in the larger interest of the society, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.118 dated 19.06.2010, under Sections 452, 324, 323, 506, 427, 148, 149 IPC, Police Station Dhariwal, District Gurdaspur (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed on account of compounding. July 14, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE