1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8897 OF 2007 Tarabai wd/o Ramsagar Pande & anr. v. Nandlal Shankarrao Chouliwar & anr. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders Mr.R.L.Khapre Advocate for the Applicants. Mr.S.L.Kotwal Advocate for Res. .... CORAM: A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 7th FEBRUARY, 2008. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing review application. 2. Heard Mr.Khapre, learned counsel for the applicants/review petitioners and Mr.Kotwal, learned counsel for respondents. Mr.Kotwal has no objection for condoning the delay of 37 days. Delay is, therefore, condoned. C.A. disposed of. M.C.A. St.No. 18632/07 3. Heard Mr.Khapre and Mr.Kotwal, 2 learned counsel for the contesting parties. 4. Mr.Khapre, learned counsel for review petitioners, submits that the fact that 250 orange trees are standing in the suit property in respect of which injunction has been confirmed by this Court and further that there is a residential house where the review petitioners are residing, was not brought to the notice of this Court, apart from the fact that the amount alleged to have been paid by the respondents for execution of sale-deed was actually not paid since the cheques issued by the respondents had bounced. Mr.Khapre also urged that as yet there is no demarcation made and hence no injunction could have been issued. 5. Mr.Kotwal, learned counsel, submits that though some cheques had actually bounced, the amount was paid in cash and for that purpose receipts were placed on record. 6. Having heard Mr.Khapre and 3 Mr.Kotwal and having seen the impugned order under review, I do not find any ground to review the order under review as, according to me, the above grounds are not sufficient to review the said order. Considering the fact that the two civil suits have become pretty old, in the interest of justice, I direct the trial Court to decide both the suits, namely Spl. Civil Suit No. 765/03 and Regular Civil Suit No. 1501/04 within a period of eight months from the date of receipt of this order. M.C.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE /TA/