In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No.M-23597 of 2010(O&M) Date of decision: 21.9.2010 Baljit Singh ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.P.S.Sullar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Latika Rao, AAG, Haryana. Mr.Karan Singh, Advocate, for the complainant. **** SABINA, J. This petition has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 448 dated 30.7.2010 under Sections 307, 109, 116 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station City Thanesar, District Kurukshetra. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it was a case of no injury and in terms of the order passed by this Court on 17.8.2010, the petitioner has joined investigation. Criminal Misc. No.M-23597 of 2010(O&M) -2- Learned State counsel, who is assisted by SI Ishwar Singh, has also submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation. Learned counsel for the complainant, on the other hand, has submitted that the petitioner is threatening the complainant as well as the witnesses. The complainant has moved applications to the higher police officials qua the threats given by the petitioner. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I am of the opinion that the present petition deserves dismissal. Although the petitioner has joined investigation in terms of the order dated 17.8.2010 passed by this Court but since it has been alleged by learned counsel for the complainant that the petitioner is threatening the complainant as well as the witnesses, it would not be in the interest of justice to grant anticipatory to the petitioner. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. (SABINA) JUDGE September 21, 2010 anita