IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-13083 of 2009 Date of decision : 22.09.2010 Ajay ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Rajesh Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Malik, A.A.G., Haryana for the respondent-State. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned State counsel has submitted a memo No.8126 dated 15.09.2010 of Deputy Commissioner of Police, West, Gurgaon, which is taken on record. On instructions from P.S.I. Satinder Singh has stated that the challan in this case has already been submitted on 04.12.2009. During the course of trial the charge has been framed against the accused vide order dated 15.04.2010 and now the case slated for trial on 20.01.2011. In this view of categoric stand on behalf of the State, the instant petition becomes infructuous. 2. Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner intends to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioner to reiterate the points before the trial Court. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner in any manner in the trial. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge September 22, 2010 naresh.k