iN THE EEEH CBUR? SF £UEE£QTERE’§T JQB§LFSR \§ W ‘ wag? gETITIGM K ($RE? PETETIQM UNEER §RTEELE 22$i2§7 BF THE C$HETITBTIBN § EN§EQE Bhakia Sfa Ehainu 1‘ PETI?IQ§ERS: , A iIVEr5u5!f RES? NDEN?E: 1: State af aéhya pra e5h thraugh~ Secret&?y— “x f“ [/47 agmar €é ,1/; (u r (AA"xo @ak f /'J\ \«x m amég ) 3 { {maxi}. Nnhan Sin Bhikhari REvenue QEpaFtment %&ntralaya / BHQPALIHP}, ?&1EaEh Ehaw&n, Tha §£1e:tGr§ Rai ur i P). The Suh—Eiviaianal Sfficer, Rai ur (MF§. ?&h5ild&r; Raipur i§PED ‘ Bhagirathi Efa Eakui 4. aewaram S!G Hirda 5a Siyaram Sig Hirde é. Jeevrakhan Sie Ramai gh ?w Budheghuar §Ja Shaaaingh 3: Sukhcha d giQ Chaa§u \f §s Viahnu Efg Shivgtagad I‘\ Q; '\ @f L Q11 resi$ent af vilEage~Dam3 TahEiE & Bistt.Raiguri&§§‘ ' lOrder'Sh‘le‘at [Contdl , necessary and on perusal of relevant documents placed' ‘of‘ the view that the order passad by the Boar has indeed attained finality. Therefore, the s id order must have [its effect. WI; ws submittedatha" this court may M; wk not issue a direction to the respondent to e passed by Board of Revenue in' as much as thi court is not an executing court. This submission is made on t e ground t’hat Board of Revenue writ petitioner should have gone with his gri vanoe, that certain authorityhas failed to carry-out the order 1.. ued by board of revenue. I am of the view‘that as of now the e is no issue for :.. 7,\_ 15:“ 1 .2001 : ‘ Mr.,Alok Aradhe for the petitioner. x Dr.N.K.shuk1a, Dy.AG for the respondent. The only’grievance of the writ petitioner ‘ is ’that’ \ &espite final omérs péssed by the Bo ra of Revenue ‘dt. 464.98 vide annexure P-l the responden? 0.4 Tehsil Ear , V I is yetr'to carry—out the / said order by thu£ati > the petitioners in the relevant revenue rec after hearing the counsel for b of Revenue is a competent authority be re whom the . A Case'No. ...3;g7..‘... of 19mm...wgg Date of V Signature¥0f I Order or drderr or proéeeding with Signature ofrE‘esid‘ing Officer parties or ‘ Proceedings Pleaders where Date of - Signature of / 7/ order or Order or Proceeding With signature of Presiding Officer Parties or Preceeding I Pleaders here Oeéoo ééxi$1derationby any ccmpetent authority. in this regarygmuc'tij’ég the issue was alr settled by the Board of Revenue. 1t is but n rural that final "bra‘er should be executed m5 I di ect respondent no.4 Tehsildar Raipur to car‘éryA-o z the order of Boa rdrgf hevenue,meticu19usly w thin r- With the aforesaid directions, the pet'tion is disposed of. payn. C.c. on met Grief Justice t two weeks from the date of receipt of this o e u, e ”