=?-- .^"s /'^ae~ ff& S l^s's' '••i^. ^ XI-HC—78 ^ ~S:S! 'wvftf, •^Si^ , filCII'tl^ KrtWtRtffcR-^f'^)"'^^'"^"""'^200^— Sil^H ^R^ (lyf^^q) 3n^i ^ift-iw Wff 3n^?T :sblff4) TRIWt ^lfttl 41l4<l PETITIONER- RESPONDENTS -Versu; 1. 2. 3. 4. 28-1-2009:- Shri Jitendra Paii, counset for Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Pane to3. Heard. This petition is dlrected again^t P/1) whereby the petitioner has be*n Centre, Balod, District Durg to the Of|ice T?n^t^ft7f 'RW?tf "^ 'f^'1^ 'itf^'^K ^aifii*T3ii%?t iSianau Kam verma, Aged about 51 years, S/o Shri Pyare Lal Verma, working as Non Medical Supervisor (Leprosy) Community Health Centre, Baiod, District Durg (CG), R/o Aamapara, Balod, District Durg (CG) State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretery, Department of Health & Famiiy Welfare, D.K.S. Bhavmn, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) Director, Health Chhattisgarh, Fiaipyr (CG) Services Chief Medical Durg (CG) ana Health Officer. Shri Mohar Lal Sahu, Working as Non Medicai Supervisor (Leprosy) Office of Chief Medical and H^lth Officer, Ambikapur, Distriet Saiguja (CG) Sinale Bench: Hon'bleBhri Dhirendra Mishra, <J. tlle petiUoner. Lawyer Tor the Statefrespondents No.1 the order dated 4-10-20)7 (Annexure transferred from Community Health of Chief tyiedical and Health Qfficer, -L r /c ^ 1;J..:'-..''' ^) -'- <ITX| ^jl^ld.ll^9-»{W1^,~ (stOK-iy. <tWWi (b*ii<n •WI,200 sn^it'v^: (•jqlai't^) sn^iw R-<i<* WTT 311^1 a>*< iarve ^dlW, «l<&ci c3-- Learned counsel for the Sta|t Annexure P-1 so far as it relates to ttti due to interim order dated 23-10-1 lcircumstances, the transfer order sc| |become reduridant and meaningiess lobjection ifthe petition is atlowed wit>) |orders in the matter of transfer/po^! ladministrative exigency. Iri view of the above submissi^ |nstant petition is allowed and impug) relates to the petitioner, is set aside. liass appropriate order in the event of| |ransfer/posting of the petitioner. In view ofthis brder, ali the pen< te submits that the fransfer order of e petitioner, could not be given effect to !007 passed by ttiis Court. In these far as it relates to the petifioner has vith the lapse oftime and they have ns libsrty to the State to pass appropriate ting of the petitioner In <tii<i(?i'fl-f »iw<'fl^ife'st <r«i«(i< i;3ifim3iit?i ^n of learned counsel for the State, the led order of Annexure P-1 so far as it tlowever, the State shall be at liberty to ladministrative exigency in the matter of |ing applications stand disposed of. Sd/- Judge WB<|i(<Sjl*l Iffflll-W U-1-IWU'i— FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.