1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION O. NO.125/2011 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.407/2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5559/2010 (D) Prakash Chandra s/o Ganpatrao Duf ...Versus... The Collector, Wardha and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. [Mr. S.V. Sirpurkar, Adv. for applicant] CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATE : 25.01.2011. Heard. Mr. T.A. Mirza, learned A.G.P. waives service for respondent Nos.1 and 2. We are satisfied for the reasons stated in the application that there is sufficient cause for condoning the delay of 20 days in filing review application. Hence, delay is condoned. Civil Application is allowed. Civil Application stands disposed of. 2 MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.407/2011 This review petition is directed against the order dated 18.11.2010 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5559/2010. It is not in dispute that 13 Councillors in the special meeting for consideration the motion of 'no confidence' against the applicant - review petitioner voted in favour of the motion expressing 'no confidence' against the review petitioner, who was the President of Municipal Council and not even one vote was tendered against the motion of 'no confidence' including that of the review petitioner. In other words, the review petitioner did not have majority and had no right to continue on the seat in the democratic set up. Learned Counsel for the review petitioner submitted that the procedure was not followed by the Collector i.e. he was not granted proper opportunity and was not supplied proper documents. When the review petitioner was present in the meeting, nothing prevented him from asking for the documents and debating in the meeting. But nothing was done and therefore, his submission cannot be accepted. There is no substance in the review petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. Judge Judge ssw