IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.111 of 2008 AJAY KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 23.12.2008 In the instant writ application the petitioner prays for directing the respondents to produce the two accused persons who were arrested by the villagers as well as by the police while trying to rob the petitioner on the point of pistol, giving rise to Barbigha P.S. Case No.11/08 under section 393 of the I.P.C. The grievance of the petitioner is that the police instead of forwarding two accused persons to the court released them though the latter had no power to release a person accused of an offence under section 393 of I.P.C..He states that police made perfunctory investigation and submitted final report in favour of accused. It is submitted that C.J.M. has directed for making further investigation, but still police is not making any effort in aforesaid direction. The State has filed counter affidavit stating the in course of investigation witnesses did not support the allegation against accused persons. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties this Court directs the police to complete further investigation in this case and submit report at the earliest. However. It would be open to the petitioner to file appropriate representation pointing out the circumstance regarding the aforesaid accused in this case. 2 With the aforesaid observation this writ application is disposed of. Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)