IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-21094 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: August 02, 2011 Karamjit Singh & another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) Crl. Misc. No. M-21094 of 2011 [2] 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing FIR No.10 dated 13.2.2009 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 323, 324, 326, 34 IPC, registered with Police Station, Rangar Nangal, Tehsil Batala, District Gurdaspur, and consequent proceedings, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that disputes between the parties have been settled by way of compromise. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 contends that indeed, disputes have been settled and respondent No.2, complainant, does not want to pursue the FIR case. 4. Tarlok Singh, respondent No.2 is present in Court and states that he is the only injured and he does not want to pursue the case in view of compromise. 5. Considering the fact that the complainant, who would be aggrieved person, does not want to pursue the case, it would be an exercise in futility if proceedings are allowed to continue. Continuance of proceedings shall also not be in spirit of peace and harmony. 5. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.10 dated 13.2.2009 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 323, 324, 326, 34 IPC, registered with Police Station, Rangar Nangal, Tehsil Crl. Misc. No. M-21094 of 2011 [3] Batala, District Gurdaspur, and consequent proceedings, are hereby quashed. (AJAI LAMBA) August 02, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?