1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 26 OF 2008 Mohammad M. Cadri.... .. ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra..... .... Respondents. Mr. K. K. Giri for the Petitioner. Mrs. V. R. Bhosale, APP for the Respondent. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and S. A. BOBDE, JJ. DATED : 11TH JANUARY, 2008. P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. This is the writ petition seeking quashing of an F.I.R. being F.I.R. No. 174/2007 in B.K.C.Police Station on the ground that the said F.I.R. is false. We have gone through the F.I.R. which, prima facie, discloses a cognizable offence and at this stage when investigation is going on it is not possible for this Court to come to the conclusion as to whether the allegations leveled in the F.I.R. are false or true. 3. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the 2 medical certificate issued by the Doctor of the alleged injury to the first informant does not show that he had any injury. We have gone through the medical certificate also. That certificate shows that the Doctor has recorded alleged history of assault by an unknown person and it also shows “history of hit by hockey”. The Doctor has given his opinion, but he has advised X-ray of right knee and skull. Therefore, this Doctor' s certificate cannot be taken as final opinion which might be coming after the X-ray is taken. 4. Further, it is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the arrest itself was illegal as the investigating agency had no reason to arrest the petitioner without making inquiries from him. Since the F.I.R. discloses a cognizable offence, we do not think that police needed anything more to be done. 5. Once it was satisfied that the cognizable offence has been committed, writ petition is misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (S. A. BOBDE, J.)