1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. FIRST APPEAL NO.367 OF 2004. FIRST APPEAL NO.367 OF 2004. FIRST APPEAL NO.367 OF 2004. Mr.Kanchan Narayan Iskande : Appellant. versus Mrs.Anjali Kanchan Iskande : Respondent. Mr.Rajiv L. Patil for the appellant. Mr.U.B.Nighot for the respondent. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. DATED : 16th September 2005. DATED : 16th September 2005. DATED : 16th September 2005. ORAL ORDER [IN CHAMBER] ORAL ORDER [IN CHAMBER] ORAL ORDER [IN CHAMBER] 1. Appellant/husband and respondent/wife are present with their respective advocates in chamber. The matter had appeared before me earlier. Looking to the dispute involved, it was suggested that the parties should try for amicable settlement. Accordingly both the husband and wife have now come with a proposal to reinstate their relationship. They have filed 2 2 2 Consent Terms before me after fully understanding the contents of the consent terms. The Consent Terms are signed by the husband, wife and their respective advocates. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The respondent has agreed to withdraw maintenance proceedings vide Misc.Application No.93 of 2002 and agreed for getting the order set aside vide order dated 30.4.2005 passed therein. The statement is accepted. Appeal is disposed of as per consent terms. [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J]