Lsp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3530 of 2007 Innotech Polyfabriks Ltd. ..Petitioner V/s. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner and others ..Respondents Mr.Vijay Patil for the Petitioner Mrs.S.V.Bharucha for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. DATED DATED DATED : 29th January, 2008 : 29th January, 2008 : 29th January, 2008 P.C. Heard Mr. Patil, the learned counsel for the petitioner company. There is no dispute that the impugned order is an appeallable order under the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act and when such a statutory remedy of appeal is available, a writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution need not be entertained. 2. Hence, the petition is rejected by relegating the petitioner company to the remedy of appeal before the Appellate Tribunal under the Provident Fund Act, 1952 or any other remedy under the Act. (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J)