IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3922 OF 2006. PETITION NO. 3922 OF 2006. PETITION NO. 3922 OF 2006. Jaypal Dilip Valmiki. ... Petitioner. V/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & another. ... Respondents. A.N.Maniyar for the petitioner. Mrs.Geeta Joglekar for respondent No.1. S.N.Gawade, AGP for respondent No.2. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 19th September 2006. DATED: 19th September 2006. DATED: 19th September 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the rival parties. . Perused petition. 2. No case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. Discretion exercised by the trial Court seems to be reasonable, considering the facts of the suit filed much prior to the amendment of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. 3. In the result, petition is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)