IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminial Misc. No.25520 of 2009 Date of decision : 15.10.2009 Rattan Kumar @ Rinku .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.B.S.Teji, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab Mr. Hirday Pal Singh, Advocate for Mr. Ashu Kumar, Husband of the deceased. S. D. ANAND, J. The learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that he is not at all related to the in-laws family of the deceased lady and that he has been unnecessarily implicated in this case under Section 304-B IPC, The learned State Counsel, on instructions from the husband of the deceased lady, argues that the petitioner herein was, infact, the paramour of the deceased lady who called her upon the land line telephone shortly before her death. The plea raised thereby is that it is on account of the above allegation that petitioner is being prosecuted for the offence under Section 306 IPC. The learned State Counsel is also under instructions from the learned counsel for the husband of the deceased lady to state that it is on account of something which transpired between the petitioner and the deceased on account of which former abetted the commission of suicide by the latter. Without expressing any opinion on merits, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. October 15, 2009 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE Note: Whether to be referred to Reporter : Yes/No