IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA WRIT PETITION NO : 21832 of 1994 Between: M/s.Kranti All Caste LCC Society Rep. by its President, Sri B.Srinivasa Rao, Business, R/o.Yedida, Mandapeta Mandal E.G.Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Prl. Secretary to Government, Industrial & Commerce Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Mines and Geology B.R.K.R.bhavan, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad 3 The Deputy Director of Mines and Geology, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Kakinada, E.G.Dist. 4 The Asst. Director of Mines and Geology, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Gandhipuram, Rajahmundry, E.G.Dist. 5 The Dist. Collector, Kakinada, E.G.Dist. 6 The Executive Engineer, Godavari Head Works Division, Dowleshwaram, E.G.Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order of direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari, by calling for the records relating to and connected with the GOMs.No.357, Industries and Commerce (Mines-I) Department, dt.5/9/94 of the 1st Respondent as well as the proceedings No.2952/Q2/92, dt.23/8/1994 of the 4th respondent herein and quash or set aside the same holding it as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unsustainable and direct the 4th respondent to continue to receive the monthly proportionate bid amounts from the petitioner and allow him to carry on the quarrying operations in Reach No.8 of Akhand Godavari left Bank, between 22/0 to 26/0 of Munikudali village, Seethanagaram Mandal, East Godavari District. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.NUTY RAM MOHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondents: THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE The Court made the following Order: Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause of action in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication of the matter. Recording the submission made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ______________ 08-07-2004 krk To 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Prl. Secretary to Government, Industrial & Commerce Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Mines and Geology B.R.K.R.bhavan, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad 3 The Deputy Director of Mines and Geology, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Kakinada, E.G.Dist. 4 The Asst. Director of Mines and Geology, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Gandhipuram, Rajahmundry, E.G.Dist. 5 The Dist. Collector, Kakinada, E.G.Dist. 6 The Executive Engineer, Godavari Head Works Division, Dowleshwaram, E.G.Dist. 7. Two C.Cs. to the Government Pleader for Industries & Commerce, High Court Buildings, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad (OUT) 8. To C.D. Copies.