IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 1363 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 19/11/2007 in WP NO : 25315 OF 2006 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Rangampeta Primary Agriculrural Co-operative Society Limited, Rangampeta, East Godavari District, repby its Secretary, K. Rajeswara Rao S/o Venkata Rao aged 46 years. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 Budithi nagabhushanam S/o Booramsetti Vadisaleru Rangampeta Mandal, East Godavari District. 2 The Authority under section 48(1) of the A.P. Shops & Establishments Act, 1988 and the Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Rajahmundry. 3 The Goverment of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, labour, Employment, Training & Factories Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.M.V.RAJA RAAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.N.SIVA REDDY The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: ( Per R. SUBHASH REDDY, J) ADMIT. With the consent of the learned Advocates appearing on either side, this Writ Appeal is disposed of at the stage of admission. Learned Advocates have submitted that, there was no direction for payment of back wages ordered by the authority appointed under Section 48 of the Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 in its order dated 24.7.2006 passed in Case No. A.P.S.E.No. 3/2004. In absence of any direction for payment of back wages, the impugned order passed by the learned single Judge with regard to making the interim order of suspension passed on 8.12.2006 absolute upon condition of depositing half of the amount awarded, was not called for. In view of the above, the impugned order dated 19.11.2007 passed by the learned single Judge in WVMP No.2797 of 2007 is quashed and set aside. Looking to the facts of the case, we direct that W.P.No.25315 of 2006 shall be notiﬁed for ﬁnal hearing after Sankranthi vacation, 2009. Subject to above directions, the Writ Appeal is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. -------------------------- ANIL R. DAVE, CJ --------------------------------- R. SUBHASH REDDY, J DATE: 31/10/2008 CVM