SCA/429/2004 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 429 of 2004 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BHAGWATI PRASAD ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= BRAHMBHATT ANKIT SURESHKUMAR Versus CHANDRAKNAT SHANALAL ZAVERI AND OTHERS ========================================================= Appearance : MR HASMUKH N MAKWANA for the Petitioner MR DHIRENDRA MEHTA for Respondent Nos. 1 - 2. MS ARCHANA RAVAL, ASSTT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent Nos3 - 6 ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BHAGWATI PRASAD Date : 12/03/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT What is not denied is that the mother of the petitioner Smt. Varshaben was working in Government Department. She was so working when her husband died. In view of the admitted position that one responsible member of the family of the petitioner was gainfully SCA/429/2004 2/2 JUDGMENT employed, the question of appointment under the Compassionate Scheme is out of question. The claim of the petitioner is, thus, defeated by the very fact that Smt.Varshaben- mother, when she became widow, was gainfully employed. The petitioner is not entitled to be appointed on compassionate ground. The petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. No costs. (BHAGWATI PRASAD, J.) omkar