IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3566 of 2011 Shyam Narayan Saha, s/o- Raghubir Saha, r/o- village Harnhi, P.O.- Harpur, P.S.- District- Chapra. ….. Petitioner Versus 1. The Union Of India through Secretary, Department of Home, New Delhi 2. The Secretary, Department of Home, New Delhi. 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, CRPF, Jhapahan, Muzaffarpur, Bihar. 4. The Commandant Group Centre, CRPF, Jhapahan, Muzaffarpur, Bihar. 5. The State of Bihar through Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 6. The Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 7. Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board through its Chairman, Patna. 8. Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board, Patna. ……… Respondents ---------------------------------- 4 11.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsels for the respondent Union of India and the State. Petitioner has approached this Court questioning the sustainability of order dated 19.1.2011 (Annexure-6) whereby the respondent Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, CRPF, Jhapahan, Muzaffarpur informed him that the certificate produced by the petitioner from the Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board, Patna was not recognized by the Central Government and as such he was ineligible for the post. Mr. Ahsan, learned Assistant Solicitor General submits that the Central Government by virtue of a notification published in the Gazette of India on 22.7.2010 effected amendments in Section 18 of the Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 whereby the certificate issued by the Bihar 2 Sanskrit Siksha board, having been recognized by the concerned State Government, was accepted for the purpose of consideration of educational qualification/eligibility of a candidate for the post of Constable (G.D.). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner may be permitted to approach the respondent for review of the order by filing representation. Learned Assistant Solicitor General points out that the selection process in which the petitioner participated was completed in the year 2009. However, he does not dispute that by order contained in Annexure-6, the petitioner was finally communicated about his ineligibility for the post in question. Having heard the parties and on a consideration of the materials on record, this Court is persuaded to dispose of the application by the following order: Let the petitioner file a detailed representation before the respondent Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, CRPF, Jhapahan, Muzaffarpur (respondent No. 3) ventilating his grievances within three weeks from today along with a copy of the present order. In case, representation in the manner stated above is filed, the said respondent shall consider and dispose of the representation in accordance with law as quickly as possible. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)