IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. Wi:f~ 12006 PETITIONER w^^j. dateft. RESPONDENT A-* ?? ">.^ ••--/ ,i^ Abhimanyu Prasad Verma S/o Shri KejuRam Verma Age about 45 years, Asstt. Teacher Govt. Middle School, Tulsi Newara Block Tilda, Distt- Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) 2. District Education Officer Raipur(C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Block-Tilda,Disstt.-Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTjCLE^ 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 tI|tTCllSh*<l<sh 'sst "yitlicf^, ai-rflu'is, fsifiiuy ^vO.^h'QH.G.1!^ 2006 w^\ w* (<icitd's";liT) ^ sn^rqiTR-ii* (iwsti^i shtii* ?TaRK(if^rsn^T ehi't|Fd4)-f tiiiMl'ffte^t<Ri«i< ^sff^TTsn^r P4r examinotl-ion IS.8.2006:- Shri Somkant Verma, Shri Sumesh Bajaj, oovt. 1^1 on advance copy. Heard both the counsel. The case of the petitionei^ Teacher smce 18-2-85 and as issued by the State of M.P. the B.T.I, B.Ed. and M.Ed. 22-10-64 are entitled for two fiovernment is Annexure-P/1. examination on his own cost in th4 effect is Annexure-P/3, but the| benefit whereas, similarly advance increments under tfie or\ vide Annexure-P/4. Having heard learned coun; the facts and circumstances ofl opinion on the merit of the case, detailed representation along wit| grievances to respondent No.2 wi[ and in turn, respondent No.2 is c|l petitioner in the light of averm^ coun^el for the petitioner. ^dvocate for the State/respondents, is that he Is working as Assistont the Instructions dated 24-12-98 ^ssistant Teachers who have passed on their own expenses after advance increments and order of jThe petitioner passed his B. Ed. year 1993 and a certificate to that petitioner has not been given the t^d persons have been granted two fclers of the Tribunal and this Cour-t ;el for the parties, having regard to the case, without expressing any the petitioner is allowed to make a 1 copy of this petition raising ail his 1-hin a period of 15 days from today irected to examine the case of the Ints made by the petitioner in this P.T.O. '"•</v y 'y^6 •'v' P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3'ST "ill'illdf, WTfl^'IS, RdKiy *fl*K'IT s.b*11t» ^ 200 Sfiq^l 4a* ('i^i^'1!^) ^TfeR? gan'sn^Tsbtiiqi Sarve ^/^ STara^riStrsn^r o petition and in the representati to the conclusion that similariy 1-he benefit of two advance inci clso covered for grant of two oovernment's order, tiien to pas| from today, in accordance with With the direction Parties are entitied for ce| iitn yw. afores^tid <<ii<iFrt41-< Kiti!iT^''te^)'<Ri«[< ^srf^fTsn^T aiso. if respondenT No.2 reaches situated persons have been granted ^ements and the petitioner's case is bdvance increments on the basis of ^ orders within a period of 3 months »id,the petition stands disposed of. ^tified copy of this orcfer. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge P.T.O. 5 )--