IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. No. 166 of 2008. Decided on 17th March, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Aastha Goel. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent No. 4. : Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India. None for respondent No. 5. For respondents No. 6 to 13 and 15. : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sood, Advocate. None for respondent No. 14. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge March 17, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - - 3 - `