IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1639 of 1980 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- LUHANA THACKER VITHALDAS RATAN-SINH Versus BHATIA THACKER MEGHJI HARIDAS ASHAR -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: NOTICE UNSERVED for Petitioner No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 06/02/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT On elevation of the learned counsel for the parties as judges of this court, notices were issued to both the petitioner and the respondent. The respondent is served but he has not entered fresh appearance. The notice to the petitioner came back unserved with the report that he is not residing at the given address. The address stated in the cause title of the petition is deemed to be the registered address. In the circumstances, the revision application is dismissed. Rule discharged with no order as to costs. ******* hki