IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST FEBRUARY 2007 / 2ND PHALGUNA 1928 WP(C).No. 4949 of 2007(L) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ K.MANICKAN, S/O.KELUKUTTY, KANNANMEDU, KOZHINJAMPARA, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K. SRI.LIJU. M.P RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKKAD. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD. 4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, P.W.D.(ROADS) SECTION, KOZHINJAMPARA, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 5. SREEJITH, S/O.KASI ALIAS ARUMUGHAN, CHANDANAPPURAM, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 6. SUNIL, S/O.JAYAPALAN, KAMPILICHUNGAM, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 7. SELVAN, PANNIPERUNTHALA, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 8. RADHAKRISHNAN, S/O.VASU, PILAPULLY, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.A.SALIM, THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No. 4949/2007 APPENDIX Ext.P1: True copy of the communication made by the respondent No.4 to the Assistant Conservator of Forest dated 11-10-2006 Ext.P2: True copy of the receipt issued on 9-1-2007 to the petitioner by the Assistant Executive Engineer of P.W.D Roads Sub-Division at Chittur Ext.P3: True copy of the order dated 25-1-2007 issued by the Respondent No.4 Ext.P4: True copy of the petition dated 9-2-2007 submitted before the respondents No 1 to 3 Ext.P5: True copy of the receipt issued by the respondent No.2 on receipt of Exhibit P4 Ext.P6: True copy of the receipt issued by the respondent No.3 on receipt of Exhibit P4. //True copy// J.B.KOSHY & T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR ,JJ ------------------------------------------ W.P(C) No. 4949 0f 2007 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of February 2007 JUDGMENT Koshy.J This is a petition for police protection for cutting and removing a tree He got all the required permissions. As the counsel for the fifth respondent submitted that he is not causing any obstruction. Government pleader on instructions submits that there is no legal objection in cutting and removing the tree. Hence police protection is granted for cutting and removing the tree without causing any damages to anybody. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly J.B.KOSHY, JUDGE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR ,JUDGE es