IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3790 of 2005 KAMAL LAL DEO son of Late Mohit Lal, resident of village-Ujjaina, P.S.-Baheri, District- Darbhanga Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through its Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The District Development Commissioner-cum-the Secretary, District Board, Madhubani 3. The Executive Officer, District Board, Madhubani ----------- 3 12.01.2010 Heard Mr. Prem Kumar Jha learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Singh learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and its authorities. The petitioner who retired from the services of the respondent District Board, Madhubani with effect from 31.03.2002 while serving on the post of Vaccinator (Class-IV) has filed the writ petition for payment of his retiral benefits and other dues. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the District Board, Madhubani, copy whereof has been served on the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and in which it has been stated that the entire retiral dues as admissible to the petitioner has been made over to him. 2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner disputes the calculation of the retiral benefits made to the petitioner and submits that the petitioner is entitled to higher amount than as calculated by the authorities of the District Board. Having regard to the rival contentions set forth, this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to represent before the respondent No.2 if so advised, raising his grievance as regarding calculation of his retiral dues with supporting claims and which shall be considered by the respondent and if the petitioner has been able to make out a claim for payment of any further amount against any of the heads or for interest then the same should be made over to him within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. The writ petition stands disposed of with the direction aforesaid. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J. )