IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15132 of 2009 BAM BAM KUMAR @ BAMBAM YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 18.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prosecution case is that the informant recognised the accused who was snatching the money in torchlight, but however when test identification parade was held, the informant and his brother did not recognise the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that petitioner has got no criminal antecedents and he is in custody for several months. Learned counsel for the petitioner also avers that some money was recovered from the possession of the petitioner which was not marked, but only on the basis of suspicion he is incarcerating in jail. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. Let petitioner, namely Bam Bam Kumar @ Bambam Yadav, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S.Case No.175 of 2008. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)