1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.09.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD).No.10552 of 2011 C.Germane ... Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai-2. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent his servant or agent or any one claiming under him from dispossessing the petitioner from the public telephone booth situated at F, Block entrance, Corporation Shopping Complex, Opposite to Periyar Busstand, Madurai except under due process of law. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja For Respondent : Mr.M.Jothibasu ORDER The writ petition has been filed stating that the respondent authorities are trying to dispossess the petitioner without following due process of law. 2.Mr.M.Jothibasu, learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that the authority will proceed only after following due process of law in dispossessing the petitioner. 3.Recording the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent, the writ petition stands disposed of. Interim stay already granted stands vacated. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. sms Sd/- Assistant Registrar[AE] /True copy/ TO Sub Assistant Registrar THE COMMISSIONER, MADURAI CORPORATION, MADURAI-2. +1 CC TO M/S.M.JOTHI BASU, ADVOCATE SR.NO.34115. ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD).No.10552 of 2011 DATED:29.09.2011 1P/3C RPB : 11.10.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/