1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.48 OF 2008 AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.126 OF 2008 AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.127 OF 2008 AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.184 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax III. ...Appellant vs. M/s.Bharat Chemicals. ...Respondent. --- Mr.B.M.Chatterjee, for Appellant. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: 18TH July, 2008. P.C.:- 2 1. Perusal of the order impugned in these appeals shows that all that the Tribunal has done was that it followed its own order passed for the previous year. Perusal of the earlier orders of this Court shows that by order dated 25.6.2008 the Court noted that at the request of the learned Counsel appearing for appellant, it grants one week time to inform whether the orders of the Tribunal for previous years were challenged. The matter again was on board on 2.7.2008, again time was sought for one week to inform the Court whether the appeals challenging the orders of the previous year have been filed. The matters were on board before this Court yesterday. They were called twice, none appeared for appellant. Therefore, we adjourned it today. Today the matters again called, again none appears for appellant. As what the tribunal has done by the order impugned in the appeals is that it merely followed its decision of earlier year and as the appellant is not informing the Court whether the appeals challenging the orders of the Tribunal relating to the previous year have been filed, we have no other alternative but to reject these appeals. However, the appellants shall be at liberty to move 3 Court, in case appeals relating to previous year orders have been filed and admitted by the Court. Appeals are disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) ---