c "<-..; ^(^31.^^ HIGH COURTOFCHHATTISGARHOT BtLASPUR DIVISIONBENCH CORAM: MON'BI-ESHRI RAJEEWQUPTA. G.J. MONyBt.E5HRISUNU-KUMARSINHA,J!. ADpellant Gr.M.P. (PR) No.8314 of 2009 Lobhan Verma, S/o Shri Ghasiya Verma, Aged about 48 yeare, Rfo VitlMie Kanhera, Post Office : Khands§ira, Police Station Bemetara Distrtet Durg(CG) Respondents -'<^ VERSUS 1 Rohit Verma, S/o Dhruv Verma, Aged about28 years 2 Dhruv Verma, S/o Jhagru Verma, Aged About 45 yeare 3 Indra Bai, D/o Dhruv Vermaageclabout SOyeare 4 Milapa bai, W/o Dhruv Verma Aged about45years 5 Santoshi bai D/o Dhruv Verma, Aged about29yea!% All restdent of Padumsara, Police Station Bemetara, Distriot Durg (CG) Criminal Appeal under Sectton 378 (41 ofthe CodeofCriminal Procedure Present : Shri Vivek Rathore, counsel for the petitioner. •I HB! Ig -hiss<tei?:- l^^^^^gKj' lltl^^i^B ORDER ith' {13mApril,2010) The following order of the Court was passed by Raj^vGupta, C.J. asB18SI .y c c Shri Vivek Rathore, leamed counsel forthe petltloner, in view of the fact that the amended Section 372 of Code of Criminal Procedure providing remedy to the wctim of offence of flting an appeal against the judgment of acquittal came into force from 31.12.2009 and the impugned judgment of acquittal was passed by the trial Court much before the amendment on 22.08.2009, seeks permission to withdraw the petitioh flled by the petitioner under Section 378 of Code of ©riminaiProcedure, with the llberty offlling a criminal revision against the impugned judgment of acquittal. 2) Permission granted. 3) With the above liberty, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4) Registry is directed to return the certlfied copy of the Impugned judgment to learned counset for the petitioner immediately. Sd/- ChiefJustice subbu Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge