IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No : 24817 of 2008 Between: N.V.R. Naidu S/o Satyanarayana Kazuluru Mandal, E.G. District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of A.P. rep. by its Secretary, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner for Cooperation and Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The District Cooperative Officer, E.G. District at Kakinada. 4 The Divisional Cooperative Officer, E.G. District at Kakinada. 5 The Aryavatam PACS, Aryavatam, Kazuluru Mandal, E.G. District. 6 The Penuguduru PACS, Karapa Mandal, E.G. District. Rep. by its President. 7 P.Satyanarayana, Penuguduru PACS, Gurajanapalli Village, Karapa Mandal, E.G. District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents 1 to 4 in not taking any action against the 7th respondent in spite of inspection report in which the 7th respondent has been found responsible for the irregularities and further action of the respondents 2 to 4 in allowing the 7th respondent to conduct disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner contrary to the service regulations and also action of the 7th respondent in proceeding with the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner in biased manner in spite of objection taken by the petitioner as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution of India apart from violative of principles of natural justice and consequently to direct the respondents 3 or 4 or any other equivalent authority to conduct fair enquiry into the allegations contained in Proceedings Rc.No.1/2007, dated 26.12.2007 and Proceedings Rc.No.1/88/PACS, dated 24.9.2008 issued against the Petitioner instead of disciplinary proceedings being conducted by the respondents 6 and 7 and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.EATHAKOTA VENKATA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following O R D E R: Sri Eathakota Venkata Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ---------------------------------- (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 2nd June 2009 ksld ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KURR}