IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2010 / 28TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 1619 of 2010(B) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ GEM OLEO CHEMICALS, DOOR NO.32/353, PUTHIYA ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, BIJU PETER. BY ADV. MR.R.MURALIDHARAN (AROOR) RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, IST CIRCLE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, MATTANCHERRY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, MATTANCHERRY. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. C.K. GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2010 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ----------------------------- W.P(C) No.1619 of 2010-B ------------------------------ Dated this the 18th day of January, 2010. J U D G M E N T Challenging Ext.P1 order of assessment passed by the first respondent, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal along with Ext.P3 petition for stay, which are pending consideration of the second respondent. The grievance is in respect of Ext.P4 notice issued under the Revenue Recovery Act, without any regard to the pendency of the said proceedings. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. Considering the facts and circumstances, the second respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exts.P2 and P3 in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. However it is made clear that till appropriate orders are passed on Ext.P3 all further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P4 shall be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. ab P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE