FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7588 OF 2010 (Sunil Pratap Thakur Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. S.C. Yeramwar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.G. Patil, AGP for State. Mr. R.P. Phatke, Advocate for respondent No. 2. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATED : 11th October, 2010. PER COURT : 1. An affidavit in reply has been filed by the learned counsel on behalf of the respondent No. 2. It is stated that the claim of the petitioner is invalidated. 2. In that view of the matter, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with further liberty to challenge the order passed by the Caste Scrutiny Committee. 3. Disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, it is made clear that no adverse action shall be taken against the petitioner for a period of four weeks from the date of order passed by the Caste Scrutiny Committee. [ A. A. SAYED ] [ B. R. GAVAI ] Judge Judge ssc/wp7588.10