IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.Rev. (T) No. 64 of 2008 Decided on: 29.10.2010 Anju Thakur …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Original Application No. 688 of 2001 was disposed of by the erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal on the basis of statement made by learned Additional Advocate General that the revised pay scale has been released to the petitioner as per letter dated 6.10.2006. However, as a matter of fact, the petitioner had not been paid the revised pay scale in regard to order dated 10.10.2006. Consequently, the order passed by erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal on 10.10.2006 is recalled. O.A. No. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- 688 of 2001 be listed for hearing in due course. 2. In view of this, the present petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 29, 2010 (K. Attri)