IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-23724 of 2009 Date of decision:17.11.2009. Kulwinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. A.D.S.Sukhija, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.B.S.Teji, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioner and respondent No.2 have compounded the offences and have placed on record documented compromise, which may be read as Annexure P-2. Petitioner and respondent No.2 are present in the Court and are identified by the learned counsel for the petitioner. They own up the compounding. They further state that presently there is no dispute subsisting between them. Their joint statement is also recorded separately. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.93 dated 01.08.2003, under Sections 279, 338, 304-A, P.S. Bassi Pathanan, District Fatehgarh Sahib (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed qua the petitioner only (there are two accused otherwise) on account of compounding. November 17, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE