THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.15171 of 2010 Dated: 30.06.2010 Between: R.V. Ramana. .. Petitioner. And The A.P.S.R.T.C. rep. by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad, and others. .. Respondents. ORDER: Learned counsel on either side fairly conceded that the issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition is squarely covered by order dated 20.04.2010 rendered in W.P.No.8846 of 2010 and, therefore, this writ petition may also be allowed in terms of the said order. Hence, following the order dated 20.04.2010 rendered in W.P.No.8846 of 2010, this writ petition is allowed and the order of termination dated 20.03.2006 passed by the 3rd respondent and the order dated 23.08.2006 passed by the 2nd respondent are set aside, with a direction to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service. It is needless to mention that the petitioner is entitled to all the benefits, which are extended to the similarly placed employees. It is made clear that if there is any misconduct on the part of the petitioner, this order will not preclude the respondents to conduct enquiry against him and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 30.06.2010 v v