Writ Appeal No.562/2011 11.10.2011 Shri Vivek Dalal, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri L.R. Bhatnagar, learned counsel for respondent No.1. Ms. Mini Ravindran, learned Deputy Government Advocate for respondents No.2, 3 and 4. Shri S.R. Kochatta, learned counsel for respondent No.5. Heard. By this intra Court appeal filed under Section 2 of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyalayaya (Khand Nyayapeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, the appellant has challenged the interim order dated 30.09.2011 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No.6687/2011, by which the learned Single Judge has ordered for stay of the order dated 28.07.2011 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer and the order dated 01.08.2011 passed by the Collector, Dewas till next date of hearing, making it clear that the allotment made by the 5th respondent Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited shall be subject to the final outcome of the said writ petition. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the appellant, facing with the difficulty to support the action of the Tahsildar, by which a letter dated 07.01.2011 was issued by the Tahsildar, staying the effect of the Domicile Certificate issued in favour of 1st respondent Mohanlal Sisodiya pending enquiry about the same, made a prayer that the first respondent's (writ petitioner) writ petition be allowed, by quashing the impugned 2 orders dated 28.07.2011 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Dewas and 01.08.2011 passed by the Collector, Dewas and the proceedings pending before the said authorities as also by quashing the order/letter dated 07.01.2011 issued by the Tahsildar, Dewas with liberty to the appellant to challenge the said Domicile Certificate issued in favour of the 1st respondent (writ petitioner), by way of appropriate proceeding. The aforesaid prayer made by the learned counsel for the appellant has not been opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. In the circumstances, while disposing of this writ appeal, we allow the prayer made by the 1st respondent in the writ petition by allowing the writ petition and by quashing the letter dated 07.01.2011 issued by the Tahsildar and all the subsequent proceedings and orders including the order dated 28.07.2011 and 01.08.2011 arising out of the said letter dated 07.01.2011 pending before the Tahsildar, the SDO and the Collector. All the said proceedings shall stand closed. This writ appeal as also the aforesaid Writ Petition No.6687/2011 stands disposed of. However, a liberty is granted to the appellant to challenge the Domicile Certificate issued in favour of the 1st respondent (writ petitioner) before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law. It is also 3 made clear that the allotment made by the 5th respondent shall be subject to final outcome of any orders if passed by the competent authority in respect of correctness of the Domicile Certificate issued in favour of the first respondent. A copy of this order be retained in the file of Writ Petition No.6687/2011. C. c. as per rules. (Shantanu Kemkar) (Prakash Shrivastava) Judge Judge rcp