IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.1679 of 2011 Sukhdev Singh & another ...Petitioners Versus Financial Commissioner (Appeal-I), Punjab, Chandigarh & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.G.L.Bajaj, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The main grievance of the petitioners is that the partition should be carried out as per the possession. The mode of partition has been decided and the Assistant Collector decided that the partition has to be done by evaluation of the land and each partner should get a share of land abutting the road. The petitioner has impugned this order primarily on the ground that valuation aspect is not clear. This order has been clarified by the Financial Commissioner to say that the valuation has been clarified by the Assistant Collector that land abutting the road is to be partitioned equally. The directions given regarding the mode of partition are fair. There is no infirmity pointed out by the petitioners, which would call for interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Dismissed. July 22, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE