1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 120 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3541 OF 2005 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ This matter was listed for hearing on 1.9.2010, however, none appeared for the petitioner on the said date. Learned A.G.P. had raised preliminary objection about the maintainability of second contempt petition filed by the petitioner. The matter was adjourned to 27.9.2010. Even on 27.9.2010, none appeared for the petitioner. As a last opportunity to the counsel for the petitioner to conduct the matter, it was adjourned to today. However, today also none appears for the petitioner. Heard Mr. D.R. Korde, learned A.G.P. for the respondents. He invited my attention to para 7 of the affidavit in reply and submitted that earlier contempt petition No. 2 of 2006, which was filed alleging disobedience of the order dated 27.7.2005, passed by the learned Division Bench of this court in writ petition No. 3541 of 2005, came to be dismissed on 2 2.4.2007. It appears that the instant contempt petition is the second contempt petition filed alleging disobedience of the same order dated 27.7.2005 in writ petition No. 3541 of 2005. In spite of dismissal of earlier contempt petition , this contempt petition is filed by the petitioner. Nothing has been pleaded in this contempt petition as to how this second contempt petition is maintainable, when the earlier contempt petition is dismissed alleging disobedience of the same order, which is the subject matter of this contempt petition. In this view of the matter, contempt petition is devoid of any merits and the same stands dismissed. Notice stands discharged. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) Date:06.10.2010. rlj/