R"-!8" '•% I :5gy;^i> j Soma PETITIONER/: (Non-applicant) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WntPetitiojifArt. 227) No.680 of 2009 Asgari Begam, aged 58 years, Widow of Shekh Samshuddin, R/o Magarpara, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS/: (Applicant) 2. 3. Versys Rajjab Ali, S/o Roshan Ali, aged 43 years, R/o Chantidih, Tahsil & District Bilaspur The Additional Tahsildar, Bilaspur (C.G.) The Board of Revenue, Chhattisgarh Bilaspur, Through the Chairman {Writ petition underArticle 227 ofthe Constitution of India} Present: None present for the petitioner. No representation is made. Mr. Sanjay Shyam Agrawal, counsel for respondent No.1. Mr. Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondent No.2. None present for respondent No.3 also. Single Bench: Hon'ble IWr. T.P. Sharma, J ORDER (7-9-2011) 1. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged legality and propriety of the order dated 16-12-2008 passed by the Board of Revenue Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur in Review Petition No.Review.02/ R/A-6/48/2008 quashing the earlier orders passed by the Board of Revenue, the Additional Collector & the Sub Divisional Officer, Bilaspur and affirming the order dated 20-12-2000 passed by the Tahsildar, Bilaspur. 2. When the matter is called for hearing, none present for the petitioner. No representation is made. 3. I have heard learned counsel for respondent No.1, learned State counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2, perused the order impugned and other documents. 4. Substantially, the dispute is related to mutation of name of the parties in revenue record which does not give any substantive right to the parties. In case of dispute, parties are required to decide their claim before the Civil Court. 5. With this observation, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge