IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.85 of 2011 Most. Indra Thakur Versus The Bihar State Electricity Bo ---------------------------------- 2 15-11-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Opposite Party. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the Opposite Party No. 3 stating therein that the order has been complied with and necessary payments with respect to gratuity and provident funds have been paid to the petitioner as per Memo No. 237 dated 28th of January 2011, as contained in Annexure- A to the show cause, as such, this contempt application deserves to be dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amount on account of provident fund has been paid to the petitioner to the tune of Rs. 67, 743/- is not correct as the petitioner was entitled to Rs. 92,423/- . It is further submitted that on perusal of the order as contained in Annexure- A to the show cause, it would appear that the account was verified from the office of Electric Supply Division, Bhagalpur whereas the husband of the petitioner was posted in Central Area Electricity Board, Patna between the period 15.09.1958 to 13.11.75. Considering the submissions of the parties and the show cause as also the order as contained in Annexure- A to the show cause, I am not inclined to proceed further in the matter and the same stands disposed of. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner proposes to assail the decision with respect to the payment of provident fund dues before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)