“3‘1 y Fg {t h 35n$§1 x ya” l gfdzSOZ’w M IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAsPUR (c.G) w.P. s No. $§ 2007 PETITIONER Maheshwar Prasad Rathore Aged about 43 Years, S/o Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School ,Anjoripaii Distt. Raigarh (C.G.») Shri Kali‘Ram Rathore, VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director Public Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) »3. District Education Officer Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.) ~~_w ~."Q’ Mn Li‘“ / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA i 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS As mentioned in the cause title. . s v ’ ?k§ \y x a 6 smaLE pgncH : Hou'aLg MR, sAnsH m gem-mm. J, WRIT PETITION IS.) NO. 378 OF 2007 Petitioner : Taraahand Pan! Respondanh :_ State of Chhattisgarh and ohers WRIT PETITION (5.) NO. 379 OF 2007 Petitioner : Mahatma! Pm: d Rathom . versus Respqnd¢m§ WRIT PETITION (5.) NO. 380 OF 2097 Patih‘nner : Ramgopd Varma versus Rgspqndonis : sure of Chhattisgarn and athers WRIJ' PETITION LS.) NO. 381 9F 2W7 Pe‘h'h'oner : Tosh Kumar Nayak versus Regpondenb sate of Chhatisgarh and omen WRIT PETITIQN (SII NO- 332 QF 2W7 Peu‘tionar : Gokul Pmsad Naylk versus Reopondenu : State of Chhattisgarh and other; WRIT PETITION (SJ NO. 383 OF 2001 State of Chhattisgarh and others A!( Petitioner : Rajendra Kumar Patel versus Respondent : sute d Chhwsgarh and omen WRIT PETITION (5.) NO. 384 OF 2007 Mehadev Das Vaishnlv State of Chhwsgarh and cthors VeTSLIS Present : Mr. Anil Mourya. counsel for the peu'tioners. Ms. Sunlla Jain, Panel Lawyer for Ihe smelrespondems. ORDER (Passed on 23m Day of January, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the pariies jointly submit that the facb and question of law involved in the present writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Sushi! Timr! and others vs. SM Govemment of chhettlsgerh end others (Writ Petition (8.) No.5976 of 2006), dated 7-1 1-2006. 2. For the aforementioned reasons. mese writ petitions are allowed in tenns of the decision of this Court in die matter of Sushi! Tlwarl and others vs. State Government of Chhettlsgarh and others (Supra). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record in other connected writ Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri . Judge petitions. Petitioner , : Rooplal Patel versus Respondenb : State of Chham'sgath and other: WRIT PETITION ($4 NO. 386 OF 2w? Peh‘tioner \ Nakul Singh Patel Respondenb : State of Chhattisgarh and other: And WRIT PETITION (SJ NO. 337 OF 2007 Petitioner : Chandrika Prasad Patel Respondenh : Shh of Chhattisgarh Ind othors