IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7874 of 2010 SUNIL SINGH, SON OF GOPAL SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BANTHOO, P.S. – BHAGWANPUR, DISTRICT-VAISHALI (HAJIPUR). …..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. ----------- 03/ 23.06.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner is husband of the deceased of the case registered under Sections 304B, 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that the informant’s daughter married with the petitioner four years prior to the occurrence was done away because of her inability to bring the additional dowry of Rs. 50,000/-. A report has been called for and from the report it appears that the prosecution has examined six out of eight charge sheet witnesses and the trial court is taking steps to conclude the trial expeditiously. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the above named petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)