Crl.M.No.M-17626 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-17626 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 6, 2010 Amrawati .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Rohiteshwar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.60, dated 7.5.2010, under Sections 304-B, 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Pathankot, Tehsil Pathankot, District Gurdaspur. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully. Petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased. Brief allegations against the petitioner are that daughter of complainant, i.e., deceased was married with son of the present petitioner on 11.2.2008. Complainant being poor person had told at the time of marriage that he was not in a position to give any dowry. However, after the marriage, the petitioner started harassing the deceased on account of dowry and raised demand of motor- cycle. Daughter of complainant died on account of taunting just after two years of the marriage leaving behind one year old daughter. No accused has been arrested so far. Hence, it is not such a case Crl.M.No.M-17626 of 2010 (O&M) -2- in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Amrawati for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 6.7.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge