IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 19TH JULY 2010 / 28TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 21486 of 2010(I) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ R. NARAYANA PILLAI, DETECTIVE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CRIME BRANCH CID, EOWI,PATHANAMTHITTA (UNDER SUSPENSION) RESIDING AT PULLELIL HOUSE, WEST FORT, MAVELIKKARA, PIN-690101. BY ADV. SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY (HOME) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDURM. 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (CRIMES) CBCID HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.ANTONY MUKKATH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/07/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 21486 OF 2010 -------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is working as Circle Inspector of Police. He was the 11th accused in C.C. No.201 of 2006 on the file of Chief Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kollam. By Ext.P1 judgment, he was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment. As against Ext.P1, the petitioner filed appeal before the appellate court. The appellate court suspended the sentence alone. In Ext.P2 order, this Court suspended the conviction itself. 2. Thereafter Ext.P3 order has been issued by the second respondent, suspending the petitioner from service and also calling upon him to show cause why he should not be removed from service. On its receipt, the petitioner has filed Ext.P4 representation requesting for revocation of the suspension and to drop all further proceedings. As orders have not been passed on Ext.P4, this writ petition is filed. 3. As at present, the second respondent has not passed any order on Ext.P3 in the light of Ext.P4. Having regard to the above, I do not think it necessary that this Court should consider the merits WPC No.21486/2010 2 of the contentions raised by the petitioner. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 in the light of Ext.P4. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC (JUDGE) vps