S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.3629/2006 Date : 22.08.2006 HON'BLE MR.SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. M.L. Bishnoi for the applicant. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that co-accused have already been granted bail by this Court vide orders dated 27.07.2006 and 07.08.2006 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Applications No.3202/2006 and 3369/2006 and the case of the present applicant is on better footing. He further submits that no investigation is to be made from the applicant and since long accused-applicant is in jail, he may be enlarged on bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. I have considered the submissions made before me and perused the material available on record. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the bail application. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the applicant Mohanlal son of Dhannaram shall be released on bail in FIR No.57/2005 P.S. Chitalwana, District Jalore, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vijayant