IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Central Excise Appeal No.228 OF 2006. Central Excise Appeal No.228 OF 2006. Central Excise Appeal No.228 OF 2006. The Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax ..Appellant versus M/s. Pidilite Industries ..Respondent. Mr.A.S.Rao with with Ms. Naveena Kumari for the Appellant Coram : F.I.Rebello & Coram : F.I.Rebello & Coram : F.I.Rebello & S.R.Sathe, JJ. S.R.Sathe, JJ. S.R.Sathe, JJ. Dated : 16th August, 2007 Dated : 16th August, 2007 Dated : 16th August, 2007 P.C. 1. The first question of law as framed pertains to classification. Once that is the case, this Court will have no jurisdiction. Consequently, appeal is dismissed on the ground of want of jurisdiction. The other questions are consequential to the first question. It will be open for the applicant to prefer an appeal before the Supreme Court. Appeal, accordingly is disposed of. (F.I.Rebello, J.) (F.I.Rebello, J.) (F.I.Rebello, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.) -2-