THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.17926 OF 2011 Dated: 28.06.2011 Between: M/s. Sri Harshitha Makhila Podupu Sangam … Petitioner AND The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and others … Respondents This Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.17926 OF 2011 O R D E R: By order dated 01.07.2010 passed by the 2nd respondent, the petitioner was granted lease for collection of parking fees in parking lot No.7 in Secunderabad Area. The period of contract was one year from 01.07.2010 to 30.06.2011. It is stated that the petitioner was unable to occupy the parking lot allotted to it on account of the obstructions created by one Ayub. The said fact was brought to the notice of the respondents by representation dated 27.10.2010 and a request was made to allot parking lot No.6. Having considered the same, the 2nd respondent by proceedings dated 22.01.2011 allotted parking lot No.6 to the petitioner, however, the period of contract was restricted upto 30.06.2011 i.e., six months only instead of one year. Though the petitioner had entered into the contract, several representations have been made requesting for extension of the contract for a period of one year keeping in view the monetary loss suffered by the petitioner. Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in considering the representations of the petitioner for extension of period of contract for one year with effect from 01.07.2011, the present writ petition is filed. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri C.Damodar Reddy, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents Corporation. As the material available on record shows that the petitioner’s representation seeking extension was received in the office of the 3rd respondent on 23.06.2011, the learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation states that the same will be considered in accordance with law. Having regard to the facts and circumstances noticed above, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 23.06.2011 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Till such time, the petitioner’s contract in respect of parking lot No.6 shall not be discontinued. No costs. ___________ G.ROHINI, J JUNE 28, 2011 Note: Issue CC in two days (B/o) Ivd