v^' rT^ BEFQRE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE MATTER OF W.P. No:?.?f?./2004 PETITIONER: RESPONPENTS: /^ M/ ^ ^ M/S ARVIND KUMAR SINGH, S/0 SHRI MAHADEV SINGH AGED 31 YEA-RS; SARBADIPUR, C/0 KAHALGAON DISTT. BHAGALPUR (BIHAR) VERSUS THE EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, MINISTRY OF LABOUR, GOVT. OF TNDIA) THROUGH THE REGIONAL PROVIDE:NT FUND COMMISSIONER, REGIONAL OFFICE, RAIPUR (.C.G.) THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COM-MISSIONER & QUA8I JUDICIAL AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 7-A OF EMPLOYEE8 PROVIDENT FUNDS & MISC.ELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT 1952, SHRI BIBHISHAN PADHAN; REGIONAL OFFICE, RAIPUR [C.G.] THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT F'UND COMMISSIONER & QUASI JUDICIAL AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 7-A OF EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUNDS 85 M.ISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT 1952, SHRI BIBHISHAN PAHHAN, REGIONAL OFFICE, RAIPUR [C.G.] STATE BANK OF INDIA, THROUGH THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, . COLGONG C.8.T.P.P.L. KAHALGAON , BHAGALPUR (BIHAR) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA_FOR_ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT/ORDER OR DIRECTION AS DEEMED FIT =F XI-HC-22 "^ ^3[ -t<|41d*(, ^Tftyjl<i, ^l^y. 37T^T^T 'f^ri^T^n^ 5b4-(tctT <4%<1 ^ X" / .^7 H(*11C11 %Nitctz SV^ 'q^^ __W:£».^..4.^ 'M 200 L/ %^T'^TT®'yfea; 20.09.2004 On SL xiaeatioii bem.g iaade,| Ku.SujDtita Jciiax, couiasel fe^ AppUcation for Hearxl. urgcat licaij&ag tfae xiSAtter is taken up. the petitiol3Lcr(a). vs aUowcd. It is stated that fhe petitfot undcr Binploycca Providcnt Act, 1952, Learaed counsel for| Employees Provident Fuad Ae^: laboiircrs/eniployees are not are ia great difficulty and fhey furtfier submits fhat for tibie opportuiiity of filing fhe| witfaout opyuon gjiveu an Respondent no,2/ (he coxxipett(nt considered on ite own xnerite ia Haviag considered and the inerits of the case, in thfi will be s^ived if a duiccdoii is deteiled rRpresentation raisin^ xxo.2/fhc coiiipctcxit auifhority alc|ag fhis order, wifhia 10 days. and the coxxipetcnt authorily of the by a rcasoned oxder on its own ^orly ©.&poa»iblepreferafoty "wifhi3|i of tfae rcpresentation. It is mad^ remams, the parties includmg available uader tfae law. With fhe afbxe&aid disposed o£ Consequently applicatbn dlsposed of. C.C. ajsperrules. chl^Id^ ^l^ldT ^ 'f^^ <^^^ '^3rf^W3:IT^r icr is a coatractor who ^ covered Puttd and MisccUancoua Provisions |fhe petitbner submitted that the x>unt has been seiaed and &e bej|ng paid their dues, as sucti ttiey o|re at fhe verge of starvation, She prejsent the petitionera may be given detailed represexitation befbre authorUy, wtilcli shan be lccordaxice wifh. lav7. exprcssmg aay opaiiioa on ofthis Oowrt, end3 ofjustice lo the pedlioiiera lo make a grievsnces befbre re^portdent wifh a co^y of fbc pctition aad such representatioa bemg fited, r^spondents shall decide the samo Euierits in ac<»KlaEicewi& law as 4 weelco fix>xxi fhe date of ipeceipt clear tfaat if any grievaace stiU petitioner may avail the rcmedy obe^rvation^ this petition staixde for iaterim rcUef also staads Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^ife^ •^