-: 1 :- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 6828 of 2009 Maharashtra Rajya Prathamik Shikshak Sangh ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. ..Respondents. Mr. Sanjiv Kadam for the Petitioner. Mr. Prasad S. Dani for the respondent No.3.. Mr. V. P. Malvankar, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2– State Coram : S. B. Mhase & R. M. Savant, JJ. Date : August 7, 2009. P. C. : 1. Not on board, upon mentioning taken on board. 2. Heard both sides. After filing of the instant petition the Government has granted permission dated 6th August 2009 in favour of the Respondent No.3, in the name and style of Maharashtra Rajya Prathamik Shikshan Sangh, it is a primary teachers’ organization approved by the Government of Maharashtra. 3. It appears that there is a dispute in the management of the said -: 2 :- trust. Change Reports are pending before the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Pune and the same are not yet finalised. It appears that both the groups are trying to show that they are in power. 4. It appears that earlier on 22nd January 2009 permission was granted by the Government in favour of the present Petitioner. At that time, the Respondent No.3 claiming to be the office bearer of the Petitioner – trust filed petition before this Court bearing Writ Petition No. 2507 of 2009. Looking to the dispute in the management and taking into consideration the disputed facts we refrained from entertaining the said petition. As a result of the rejection of the said petition, the meeting was conducted on the basis of letter dated 22nd January 2009 by the present Petitioner. It appears that thereafter the Respondent No.3 representing the Petitioner could persuade the Government that he is the office bearer, and therefore the order dated 6th February 2009, which is similar to the order dated 22nd January 2009, came to be passed except that the date of holding the conference is different. 5. What we find is that because of the dispute between the parties in respect of the management, the Government has favoured both the groups by granting appropriate permissions to hold the conferences. -: 3 :- In view of the disputed facts we refrain to entertain the present petition also. Petition is rejected. 6. It is important to be noted, at this stage, is that the Government is favouring both the sides by issuing similar types of orders. We therefore direct the Assistant Charity Commissioner who is dealing with the Change Reports of the Petitioner - trust , that he shall decide the same without being influenced by the orders issued by the Government in this respect. We further direct the Assistant Charity Commissioner to dispose of all the change reports in respect of the present trust as early as possible in accordance with law, after giving hearing opportunity to the parties concerned. Needless to say that the early disposal is in the interest of the trust and the Charity Commissioner should see that the Trust runs and it does not come to an halt as a result of the dispute between two factions of the Trust. 7. Petition is accordingly disposed of. (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)