IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 9458 of 2006 Dalip Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana etc. ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Counsel for the petitioner points out that during the pendency of the writ petition, order Annexures R-16 and R-17, have been passed. The petitioner has already filed an appeal against the said order, which is pending. Counsel for the petitioner, accordingly, submits that the present writ petition would be rendered infructuous as he would have to now pursue his remedy of appeal against the impugned order passed afresh. The counsel prays that the present writ petition be disposed of as infructuous with the direction to the appellate authority to decide the appeal within time bound period. I consider the prayer made to be reasonable. Accordingly, while dismissing the writ petition as infructuous, a direction is issued to the appellate authority to consider the feasibility of deciding the appeal within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. November 29, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE