CW-12496/10 (1) In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12496/2010 Geeta Kumari Khandelwal Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Date of Order :: 24/09/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Girish Khandelwal, for petitioner. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner with the grievance that appointment of respondent-3 on the basis of recommendation made by Parshad of Ward-3, who was one of applicants and the member of Committee, is in violation of the scheme laid down and so also of principles of natural justice It will be relevant to observe that petitioner and respondent-3 both are holding qualification of Secondary School Examination from Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan (Ajmer) and both are third divisioners and after consideration, the respondents made recommendation of respondent-3 appears to be on the premise that she is elder to the present petitioner; in such circumstances after examining comparative merit of both the applicants, name of respondent-3 has been recommended for appointment as Aanganbari Worker. The submission made by the counsel for CW-12496/10 (2) petitioner that the recommendation made by Parshad of Ward-3 who was one of applicants and the member of Committee is in violation of scheme and also of principles of natural justice, is of no substance for the reason that she had participated as member of the Committee, it is not the case of the petitioner that respondent-3 is related to Parshad of ward No.3 and in absence whereof, the recommendations cannot be held to be bad in law. This Court finds no substance in the instant petition. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed. (Ajay Rastogi),J. VS Shekhawat/-p.2 12496cw10Sep24FnlDsms.doc