[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.1473 OF 2008 Mohan Tarachand Mukhi and Anr. ..Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.A.Landge for Mr.Harshad Bhadbhade Advocate for Applicants Mr.S.S.Pednekar APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 10, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 10, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 10, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking anticipatory bail in CR No.19 of 2007 of Nasik Road Police Station, Dist.Nasik. The said case is mainly under Sections 420 and 467 r.w. 34 of IPC. 3. The learned advocate for the applicants states that he is not pressing this application at this stage in respect of applicant no.2-original accused no.4. Hence, this application is being considered [-2-] only in respect of applicant no.1-original accused no.2. 4. The learned APP on instructions states that the applicants were guarantors for the main borrower. The learned APP further states that as per the one time settlement scheme, the original borrower paid 95% of the amount to the complainant-bank. Thus, it is submitted that the custody of the present applicant is not necessary. In view of the above facts, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to applicant no.1. 5. In the event of arrest, the applicant no.1-Mohan Tarachand Mukhi be released on bail in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rs.twenty five thousand only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant no.1 shall report to the Investigating Agency as and when called. 6. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]