<! s HiGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARhLAT BiLASPUR Sjnale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dilip Rapsaheb Deshmykh, J. Appellant Glaimant Miscellaneous ADReal [ C } No.1066 of 2007 Ganesh Ram Rawat S/oTiharuram Rawat, aged about 45 years, by Caste Rawat,r/oViilage-Kaudiyapara,Thana- Pithoura, Tahsil & District Mahasamund yersus . 1. S. Pa!vinder Sirigh Maan S/o Tehal Singh Maan, R/o j G.E. Road, Tatibandh, Raipur, Tahsi! & Djstrict Raipur(C.G.) ' , (Owner of the Vehicle No.CG-04-G- 57S6) • , , . ^ 2. United 'lndia; Insurance Company Lirnited, Regional Qffice, Jail Road; Raipur,DistrictRajpur(C.G.) (Insurer of the Vehieie No.CG-04-G- 5786) Memorandum of appea! under Seetion 173 of the Motor Vehicies Act, Present : Shri Sunil Sahu, counsel for the appeliant. ORALORDER (Passedon 14"'September, 2007) Heard. (2) Beingaggrieved bythe impugnedawarddated 26-07-2007 passed by the Motor Accidents Ciaims Tribuna!, Mahasamund (henceforth 'the MACT') in Qlaim Case No. 103/2006, wherebya sum of Rs.17,783/- has been awarded towards compensation in an injury ease, the 'n !H^^f^3j| 1 ^ \: 2. appellant/claimant has preferred this appeal for enhancement of the compensation. (3) Aperusal of the impygned award shows that the appellant/daimant did not adduce medical evidence to prove grievous ihjury to'the right ieg. X-Ray report was a!so not fited to prove the fact of any grievous injury sustained by the appellantfciaimant. Certfficate of permanent disability suffered by the appeilant?c!aimant was also not filed. The treating doctor was alsonot examined. . (4) in this view of the matter, no interfeTence is calted for in the impugned award pass^d by the MACT. (5) in the result, this appeai being devoid of merltis dismissed atthe stage ofadmission. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge * s-i