IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No.424 of 2010 Date of decision : October 29, 2010 Murari Lal …Appellant. Versus Bohri Devi and others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Appellant : Mr. Dharamvir Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. G.R. Palsara, Advocate. Surjit Singh, J (Oral) Heard and gone through the record. 2. Plaintiff-appellant filed a suit for declaration that he was owner in possession of the suit land, on account of his having remained in possession for more than 12 years and his possession being open, hostile, uninterrupted and to the knowledge of the defendants-respondents, who are recorded as owners. He also sought relief of permanent prohibitory injunction. 3. Trial Court has dismissed the suit, with the finding that the plaintiff-appellant is out of possession and that the entries in the revenue papers, prove that possession is with the defendants-respondents, who are also recorded as owners and that presumption, attaching to the entries in the Jamabandi, has not been rebutted by the plaintiff-appellant. Appeal of the plaintiff-appellant filed in the Court of learned Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …2… District Judge has also been dismissed and the aforesaid finding of the learned trial Court affirmed. 4. No substantial question of law arises. Decree of the learned trial Court, as upheld by the learned District Judge, is based on a finding of fact that the plaintiff is not only not in adverse possession, for the last 12 years, but is in fact not in possession. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. October 29, 2010(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J