IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.W.J.C. No.10887 of 2008 SARFUDIN ANSARI & ORS. Vrs. THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. **** /2/ 05.05.2009 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners have filed this application for quashing the order, dated 14.03.2008, passed in Consolidation Revision Case No. 63 of 2002 by the Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna, as well as the order, dated 23.09.2000, passed in Revision Case No. 457 of 1997 by the Joint Director, Consolidation (Hqr.), Bihar, Patna. Further, prayer is for quashing the orders, dated 25.05.1995, passed in Revision Case No. 3225 and 3226 of 1986. 3. From the pleadings, it transpires that the petitioners and the respondents have continued to agitate this dispute for a very long time. On several occasions the dispute has travelled from the revenue authorities to the High Court. Not less then three occasions either the petitioners or the respondents have preferred writ application against the order passed by the Director/Joint Director, Consolidation, under Section 35 of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation - 2 - Act, 1956. The dispute relates to title and possession of the parties with respect to the land in question. Both are claiming settlement of the land in their favour. The question, which requires consideration, can be finally settled only by a Civil Court of competent jurisdiction where the parties will get an opportunity to lead evidence in support of their claim. 4. In view of the matter, I do not find any reason to interfere with the order. This application is being disposed off with a liberty to the petitioners/respondents, whosoever, is aggrieved to approach the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction to get their dispute settled finally. Cp:2/S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J.)