IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40286 of 2008 1. SURO RAI @ SURENDRA RAI 2. SHAMBHU RAI 3. BIPIN RAI 4. MURARI RAI 5. NIRO RAI 6. GUJO RAI 7. RAJENDRA SAH @ RAJENDRA SAH ………PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ………OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2. 15.10.2008. Heard both the sides. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case under Section 323 besides some other sections of Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that there is a land dispute between the parties. The land in question has already been mutated in favour of petitioners. In a proceeding under Section 144 Cr.P.C. the petitioners were also found in possession over the land in question. In support of above contention, observation made in the impugned order has been referred. On the other hand, learned counsel for the informant has objected the prayer for anticipatory bail. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in case of arrest or surrender before the Court below within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, petitioners namely, Suro Rai @ Surendra Rai, Shambhu Rai, Bipin Rai, Murari Rai, Niro Rai, Gujo Rai and Rajendra Sah @ Rajendra Sah are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.5000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the - 2 - satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Chakai P. S. Case No. 51 of 2007, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)