CRIMINAL MISC.-M NO.30598 OF 2011 (O&M) :{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 05, 2011 Manjeet Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. M. S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner prays for direction to the respondents not to harass him unnecessarily and not to call him in the Police Station without notice in writing as required under law. The petitioner was studying in B.Sc. with daughter of respondent No.4 and they know each other. As per the petitioner, they used to meet off and on and also used to call each other on telephone. It is averred that after completion of the studies, the petitioner and daughter of respondent No.4 have not contacted each other. As per the petitioner, CRIMINAL MISC.-M NO.30598 OF 2011 (O&M) :{ 2 }: he has now received a threatening telephone calls from respondent No.4, warning him to keep away from his daughter. The petitioner is allegedly been called by respondent No.3 to appear before him and so has filed this petition. To me, there does not appear to be any cause for the petitioner to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to seek such direction. Apparently, there is something more than what meets the eyes. Respondent No.4 may have had a cause of grievance concerning his daughter and in case the petitioner is cause of any problem, then obviously complaint made would require the police to interfere. I do not see any justification to interfere in such like matters. The petition is accordingly dismissed. October 05 ,2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE