m?y HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER RESPONDENTS K WRTT PETmON (S) No. 205 of2009 Tikeshwar Sin^i Aged about 43 years Head Master S/o Shri Hari Sin^i Thakur, ©ovt. Prunary Schocd Mulla Distt. Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Seeretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Commissioner, Public Instruction Directoral Raipur, Distt. Raipur(C.G.) 3. The Distt. Education Officer Kanker, Distt. Kanker(C.G.) 4. Shri K.P.Khare Upper Division Teaeher, Middle Schopl Oovindpur, Annupuma Para, Distt.Kanksr(C.G.) WRITTETmON UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTTTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Ue Shri Satish K. Asnihotri, J. Present: Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate forthe petitioner. Smt Smita Ghai, PMiel Lawyer forthe State/respondents 1 to 3. ORALORDER (Passed on 29th day of April, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on insb'uctions, submits Ihat the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at fhis stage. However, he prays that the respondetit-authorities may be directed to consider and deeide his pending representations, as expeditiously as possible. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for Ifae State/respondents submits that in the event, the representations datedlQ. 10.2008 and; 06.08.2008 (Annexure P/7 eolly.), are pendmg considei-ation, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent authorites m accordance with law, on its own merit, as expeditiously as possible, preferably withm a period offour weeks from Ihe date ofreceiptofa eopy oftiiis order. 3. In view ofthe above, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothingsurvives for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, fhe petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Amit Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge ;t" •iifl 1< 'S:: .ti;J~':i:^'!"^:"ys^L'%.^~;.:. .3^ ..