Crl. Misc No. M 28426 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M 28426 of 2011 Date of decision : October 13, 2011 Dalip ...... Petitioner v. State of Haryana, ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. R.S.Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG Haryana *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.135, dated 30.7.2011, registered under Sections 15/27A/29/61/85 of the NDPS Act, at Police Station Jakhal. On 19.9.2011, the following contention was noticed :- “ Learned counsel has argued that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot when the alleged recovery of 51 kilograms of poppy husk was made and as per the version in the FIR even though four persons were named, yet only the presence of two has been accounted for. Further since there is no other similar case registered against the petitioner the possibility of false implication cannot be ruled out.” Today, counsel for the respondent, on instructions from HC Hans Raj, has stated that as per phone records, on the fateful day the Crl. Misc No. M 28426 of 2011 ::2:: petitioner made 18 calls to the main accused Mangal Singh and that Mangal Singh made 14 calls to the petitioner. No reasonable explanation is forthcoming from the side of the petitioner as to why so many calls were exchanged on the fateful day. In these circumstances, I do not deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Consequently, this petition is dismissed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) October 13, 2011. JUDGE `kk'