1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR LPA No.265/2011 in WP No. 662/2011 Shaikh Tajjumal Shaikh Rajjak Vs. The Learned Member, Industrial Court, Yavatmal. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Ms. Raskar, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Khan, AGP for respondents 1 to 4. CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ DATED : 17th NOVEMBER, 2011. Ms. Raskar, the learned counsel for the appellant states that the Industrial Court was approached with specific grievance of breach of Section 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act. That grievance has not been considered and the matter has been unnecessarily confused with challenge to retrenchment and a relief of reinstatement. Before the learned Single Judge, the arguments in this respect pointing out the violation of Section 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act and absence of finding by the Industrial Court upon it were advanced but then that aspect has not been considered. After hearing Advocate for the appellant 2 and learned AGP for respondent nos. 1 to 4, we find that in the impugned order the learned Single Judge has nowhere mentioned any such efforts on the part of the petitioner. Even in the memo of appeal, there is no assertion that though the arguments were advanced it was not considered by the learned Single Judge. Hence, with liberty to the appellant to take steps which are open in law, we dispose of the present L.P.A. JUDGE JUDGE Ambulkar.