.{1}. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.298 OF 2008 Vinod Anant Bibvekar. ..Petitioner. Versus The Union of India and two others. ..Respondents. ... Mr.S.V.Marne, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the respondent. ... CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : 2ND MARCH, 2009. DATED : 2ND MARCH, 2009. DATED : 2ND MARCH, 2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the respondent informs the Court that as the matter pertains to recruitment in railways, the appropriate forum for the petitioner will be to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal as provided under Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. 3. We therefore permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition and approach the Central Administrative .{2}. Tribunal in the matter. The C.A.T. shall sympathetically consider the case of the petitioner on the issue of delay, if any in approaching CAT, as the petitioner was pursuing a remedy before this Court by invoking its extraordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226 & 227 of Constitution of India, 1950 under bonafide legal advise. 4. The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. [J.N.PATEL,J.] [J.N.PATEL,J.] [J.N.PATEL,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]