ON-^1101 ^^........ ^^€ff- ,tK'""•"••-"- wbysh^SS"?^':'"w dat^..5.xrS;^;l-u/:2^., IN THE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR ^ WRITPETITIONNO.^3^77,OF2905 : ^ RESPONDENTS: r4.0'£ ^^yc\^j>"^''^\ f o^^ ^ ^' ^^vy& ^T^^ ^^!!!aS^. '^ ^^^w.^^,^ ^ "^ l, .t^^.^1 %.^ •i./ ^' ..?'/• '--^-,..^. SatishOiiaiich'aSim, B/Q Lsite Sfcri S.LSuri Agsd sibout 65 years, Ooeayatiffli - Retired Depfuty Dim^or, R/o R/6 VincAia I^BT, Bils^iSs, Tahsal aad ESsteid; Bil^pur(OG). /(l) Stete of QihattisgA Secrdaiy, Agricialture (Vetsrinary) D^ortnaas^ D. K. S, Buildn^ 8aqw(Ca) ^) Dwector Veterinary Servioes, Oihattis@adi> Raipur, Tahsil and DistrictRapiff (CO) /^) Tbe Jcmt Durector, Vetainary Servioes, Bila^ur. Tshsfl saad Disttictma^)w(OG). ^(4) Dqsujty Directea" Vdsmtaty SSo'vioes. Koabe^ Tahsil aad Disteict^srt^(00). ^f5) Q-. QR Tiwai Veterinaiy Estecsion Offioer, teoi^i Deputy Director Vetermaiy Semoes» ^Mte, Tahsil aad Distdct Korba (03). WRITPETmONU/A 226/227 OFTHECONSmTUTIONOFINDIA L-— XI-HC-22 37T^T'^F RvlJ5h <3Tl|^T ^RT^^TI 'L' ^^ '^^TI^PT, ^•<l1^'l<o, f®|<ni^li< HW^i ^HIcb 3ff^?r xi^? _ ^^ ^I^ls.^^ •I^^T' ^H^T t^TT^ ^Tf^T Divisiors Bench : HonJote_Shn_Justice V.X Shrivastdva._Z& Hon'bl®Shri JustJe®S.K.Aanihotn 25.11.2005 Shrs Awadh Tripathi/CounseI Heard. Petitjoner who is a resident of Veterjnary Department, has fil^d interest litigation cpntBnding that| working as VetBrirsary Extension 01 is being transferred from time to t| complied with those transfer ord^s present posting at Korba Respond| the orders passed by the &overnr(tent timBS, Instead of any punishr|ient respondents No.i to 4 by making pc^y sajary'and loss to 1+ie pubiic If a ^overnment servant w9l1 by the ^ovemment or commits Sovernment to take appropriate Services (Classification, Cohtrol anc there are ^tfeclfjc ruies tb 'meet chl^td<li1T1 'iTP=^ff'? ft^ Ti^R?R . '^'srf^RSTT^T J. for the petitioner, |f BiJaspurand retired empioyee this petition styling as publjc the respondent No.5, who is ::icer in Veterinary Department/ |me by the Sovernment, ^as not and still avoiding to join the ^nt No.5 deliberately disobeyed not only once but several he has been rewarded by ityment of Rs.1,95,829/- towards ^xchequer, |ul!y disobeys the orders issued ^ny misconduct/ Et is for the ^ction uncSer Chhattisgarh Civil Appea!) Rules, 1966 oind when |such exigency, we are of the [Tfr^ ^f^^l XI-HC-22 ^T^T^T R-iich ^ni^T ^Ml^ ^ raju h 1^ '^ ^. o* ^ ^~sr ^l^lld^ ^•d1^JI<o, JG«ni^li< 3TI^T 'q^? . wA HIHdl ^^l<=h o5 . , •^ 200 •^F^T' ,i^^^ V^l "L •. ^v:^^:-:- ^n^ ^^^:^:s''''^~m erjforce orders ^be^ed considered opinion that such public ' x.% ..' ' to over throw the law already appropriate steps to get its With the aforesaid observats'^ns In the light of the above I.A.No.9858/2005 stand Bisposed of Sd/- V.K. Shrivastava Judge ^)Tqfe[^ 'HF^*"? 'ft^t <fat$j< '^•^rf^ma^T interest iitigation is not tenaBle ^overnment-should take ^ this petition is dismissed. rder, M.W.P.No.4718/2005 and Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge [Tit^ ^n^^i