IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14863 of 2008 SUNIL KUMAR YADAV & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.18892 of 2008 SUNIL KUMAR YADAV & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 26.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Certificate cases in question in both the writ applications relate to the year, 2002 i.e. Certificate Case Nos. 11 of 2002 and 14 of 2002 respectively. Challenge has been thrown in both the writ applications against the notices issued under section 7 of the Public Demand Recovery Act. The primary objection has been raised on behalf of the respondents Bank that there is no explanation offered by the petitioners as to why he had challenged the certificate proceedings after more than six years and that too without filing any objection under the Public Demand Recovery Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has a very good case under law against the proceedings. The Court can only observe that the question of law can very well be raised before the Public Demand Recovery Officer and the question of law can very well be looked into by him. Challenge to the proceedings in absence of any objection having been initially filed by the petitioners under section 9 of the Act, the present writ applications are misplaced at this stage. Both the writ applications stand disposed of. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.) - 2 -