HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 4909 of 2005 ^ Petitioner Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. Tirath Raj Shukla, S/o Shri Ram Siromau Shukla, aged about 44 yeara, occupation service (Forest Guard), R/o ViUage aad Post Janakpur, Tehsil Bharatpur, Distt. Koria (C.G.) State of Chliatisgarh, titu-ough it's Secretary, Departaient of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawau, Raipur (C.G.) Conservator of Forest, Forest Cirele - Sui^uja, Ainbikapur (C.C}.) Divisional Forest OfiRcer, Forest Division KoriafC.G.) CoUector Koria, Distt. Koria (C.G.) (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotn J.) SIui Vinay Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri Shashank Thakxir, Paael Lawyer for fbe respondents. O RD E R (orall ( Passed on this 25th day ofJune, 2009 ) The petitioner has filed fhis writ petition challeugiag the trausfer order dated 9.9.2005. Accordiag to leamed counsel appearing for fh.e petitioner, by virtue of tiie iuterun order dated 5.10.2005, passed by this Court, the petitioner is continuiag at fhe origin.al place of postiag, Be fb.at as it inay, with ttie passage of tiiae, this writ petitioa has becoine iufi-uctuous, as the period of transfer is uot applicable forever. At fhis poiat of tune, it is not necessar;' to exanuiie ttie legaMty and validity of fhe traasfer oi-der, as fhe impugned order could not be given effect to on account of the iiiterun stey order dated 5.10.2005, passed by this Court. However, the respondents are at tilberty to pass appropriate l!Jil..i-i ! E!-: % ^ 3. Tbakur orders, keepiag in view fhe public iaterest aad admiTiistra.tive exigency, if so advised, wifhout insistmg on coiapliance of the impugned transfer order. In view of the above, fhis wnt petition stauds disposed of. No order asto costs. I satishK.Agnihotri 1