IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39326 of 2007 RAM NARAIN KUMAR SAH SON OF BHAVE CHAND SAH, R/O VILLAGE- MUSHAHARI, P.S.- MUSHAHARI, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. PHOOLO DEVI W/O AMRIT RAM 3. RAJENDRA RAI SON OF LATE GAYA RAI 4. MAHESH RAI SON OF RAM CHANDRA RAI 5. ANANDI PASWAN SON OF LATE JAGDISH PASWAN ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MUSHAHARI, P.S.- MUSHAHARI, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR 5 19/03/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the APP and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. After going through the records, it appears that earlier the petitioner has filed a petition under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Inquiry was made and after inquiry, the Court on 11.9.2006 found that no ground for interference is made out. That order was challenged before the Appellate Court and the order of the Trial Court was affirmed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. 4, Muzaffarpur on 7.7.2007 in Cr. Appeal No. 117 of 2006. It appears that the Courts below have discussed in detail the facts and circumstances which have compelled them to arrive at the conclusion. The orders are correct and need no interference. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)