Civil Revision No. 1822 of 2008 -1- *** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1. Civil Revision No. 1822 of 2008 Date of decision : 22.2.2010 Bhagwan Dass ....Petitioner Versus Gurdeep Singh and another ...Respondents 2. Civil Revision No. 1823 of 2008 Bhagwan Dass ....Petitioner Versus M/s Sethi The Fashion People ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. M.L.Sarin, Senior Advocate with Ms. Himani Sarin, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mukul Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondents. S. D. ANAND, J. There is want of controversy on the factual state that the following applications, filed by the parties indicated herein, remained untouched at the hands of the learned Appellate Authority:- 1) Application U/O 41 Rule 27 and Section 151 CPC for additional evidence and also for taking note of the subsequent events and for permission to lead evidence to prove the said subsequent evidence. Civil Revision No. 1822 of 2008 -2- *** The application had been filed by the tenant (petitioner herein). 2) Application for bringing on record the subsequent facts. The application had been filed by the tenant (petitioner- herein). 3) Application under Section 15 of the East Punjab Rent Restriction Act, 1949 read with order 41 Rule 27 and Section 151 C.P.C. for permission to lead additional evidence. It cannot possibly be contested that the allowance ( if at all) of applications aforementioned might have had a bearing on the ultimate adjudication of the controversy under challenge. In view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Rajbir Singh Vs. Virender Singh and others 1996(1) Punjab Law Reporter 703 and Jatinder Singh and anr. Minor through mother Vs. Mehar Singh and others JT 2008 (11) SC 30, the petition shall stand allowed. The impugned judgment rendered by the Appellate Authority shall stand set aside. The matter shall be listed before the learned Appellate Authority on 5.3.2010. The learned Appellate Authority shall dispose the application aforementioned within fifteen days from that date. In view of the verbal request on behalf of the petitioner herein, it is directed that even the main appeal which has been pending since year 2005, the same shall thereafter be disposed of expeditiously. February 22, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE