- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION No.805 OF 2006 APPLICATION No.805 OF 2006 APPLICATION No.805 OF 2006 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER No.125 OF 2006 Vishnu K. Gaikwad & Ors. .... Applicant Vs. Dnyaneshwar S. Gavli & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. G. S. Godbole, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. R.V. Govilkar, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. CORAM CORAM CORAM : D. G. KARNIK, J. : D. G. KARNIK, J. : D. G. KARNIK, J. DATE DATE DATE : SEPTEMBER 7, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 7, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 7, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Mr. G. S. Godbole,the learned counsel for the Applicant. He makes a statement that some subsequent events have occurred which entitle the Applicant to claim an injunction. 2. The suit is not yet decided. This application having been filed in an appeal against the interlocutory order. If any events, have taken place, subsequent to filing of the suit, entitling applicant to claim an injunction, he is free to move to the trial Court for appropriate reliefs. It is not necessary to consider such events for the - 2 - first time in this appeal against an interlocutory order. Hence, Civil Application is disposed of with liberty to the applicant to move to the trial Court for appropriate reliefs. [ D. G. KARNIK, J. ] D. G. KARNIK, J. ] D. G. KARNIK, J. ]