IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:26744 of 2000 Between: Dasari Santosh, S/o.D.Rajan, R/o/Roi Shastri Nagar, Armoor Village, Nizamabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector, Nizamabad District, Nizamabad. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Armoor Mandal, Armoor, Nizamabad District. 3 The District Panchayat Officer, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. 4 The Executive Officer, Armoor Gram Panchayat, Armoor, Nizamabad District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:NONE APPEARED Counsel for the Respondents:AGP FOR ASSIGNMENT The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated above, the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to call for the records relating the impugned proceedings No: E1/3270/2000, date:8-12- 2000 passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary by issuing act of Certiorari and consequently direct the respondent to allow the petitioner to allow the house property situated in Plot No.87/2, in Sy.No.401/67, Shastri Nagar, Armoor Village, Nizamabad District.” On 06.09.2008, when the case was called, there was no representation for the petitioner and, therefore, the writ petition was adjourned for today to be posted under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in default. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 8th SEPTEMBER, 2008. kvni