IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.22391-M of 2010 Date of Decision:23.9.2010 Khazan Singh and others .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Dinesh Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikram Jain, Addl. A.G. Haryana. Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate for Smt. Saroj. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The present petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 109 dated 1.5.2010 registered under Sections 306/309/498-A/34 IPC at Police Station Sadar Sonepat. It is not disputed that petitioners No.3 to 5 are not named in the FIR and there is no allegation against them. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from ASI Paramvir Singh states that the petitioners No.3 to 5 have since joined the investigation. Accordingly, order dated 5.8.2010 is made absolute and the petition is allowed as such. 23.9.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE