IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.43 of 2008 Ram Deo Yadav, son of Late Shiva Nath Yadav, resident of Village-Nirpur Pokhara, Post-Ankuri, P.S.-Goh,District- Aurangabad (Bihar). …………………………..Petitioner. Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board, through its Chairman/ Secretary, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Magadh Electric Supply Region, Gaya. 3. The Deputy Director of Accounts, Magadh Electric Supply Region, Gaya. 4. The Executive Electricity Engineer, Supply Division, Aurangabad. 5. The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Aurangabad (Bihar). ------------- 2. 25. 11. 2009. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner and the Respondent- Board are present. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of Respondent- Board stating details of payment to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, although, most of the grievances of the petitioner have been redressed. However, some payments towards over time has remained to be settled for which petitioner seek permission to ventilate his grievance before the concerned authority of the Board. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to raise his grievance, if any, which has remained to be settled before the concerned authority. With the above observations/directions, the writ application stands disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)