IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 1721 of 2005 Between: Muthyam Laxmaiah, s/o Mallaiah, R/o Komaravalli Village, Cheriyal Mandal, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Director General of Police, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. 4 The Deputy Commissioner of Police, East Zone, (SOT), Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Order, Writ or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents herein to produce the detenue Muthyam Anjaneyulu aged about 28 years, R/o Komaravalli Village, Cherial Mandal, Warangal District, before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty after declaring his arrest as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.H.SIDDAIAH Counsel for the Respondent No.: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following : O R D E R (Per BN,J) In response to the allegations in the writ affidavit that the detenue has been illegally apprehended by 4th respondent and a cell phone number was given to contact, a counter affidavit has been filed stating that the cell phone number mentioned in the writ affidavit belongs to Sub Inspector of Police, Special Operation Team, Cyberabad, Commissionerate and that the detenue is arrested in Crime No.271/2004 for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C. and is remanded to judicial custody. 2. Since the detenue is now arrested in Crime No.271/2004 and is on remand, we do not think any further orders need be passed and the writ petition is closed. 3. However, if the petitioner has any grievance, he is at liberty take appropriate steps available under law. ------------------------ BILAL NAZKI,J ---------------------------------- L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J AVS DATE:02.03.2005 To 1 The Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Director General of Police, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. 4 The Deputy Commissioner of Police, East Zone, (SOT), Hyderabad. 5. Two C.Cs. to G.P. for Home for Advocate General, A.P. High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 6. 2 C.D. copies.