IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-30604 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 27, 2011 Narinder Singh. …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Daldeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State. Mr. Mahavir Sandhu, Advocate, for the complainant. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 118, dated 26.08.2010, under Sections 465, 468, 471, 406, 420 IPC, registered at Police Station Shahzadpur, District Ambala. CRM M-30604 of 2010 Learned counsel for the complainant has stated that now he has no grievance against the accused- petitioner, as petitioner has executed sale deed in favour of the complainant. Learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions from ASI Jasraj Singh, who is present in Court, states that the petitioner has joined investigation. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. Order dated 14.10.2010 is made absolute, subject to the limitations provided under Section 438(2) of the Code. Petitioner-accused shall participate in the investigation as and when he is required. January 27, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2