IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.22852 of 2010 Date of Decision : February 15, 2011. Kuldip Kumar .....Petitioner versus Punjab Police Housing Corporation Ltd. & another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Puran Singh Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is an approved Government Contractor who had executed the work regarding construction of metalled road in the campus of the District Jail, Mansa which was allotted to him by the respondent-Corporation. The Executive Engineer (Civil) of the Corporation has passed the impugned order dated 11.8.2010 (Annexure P- 10) whereby the earnest money deposited by the petitioner has been forfeited on the plea that he failed to execute the work within the agreed period and has no inclination to complete the same. The petitioner, on the other hand, has attributed the cause of delay to the respondents. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the factual assertions made by the petitioner, I deem it C.W.P.No .22852 of 2010 2 appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation-cum-appeal against the impugned order, to the Managing Director of the respondent-Corporation who, in turn, is directed to verify the factual pleas taken by the petitioner and pass an appropriate order within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. February 15, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE