-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 893 OF 2006 APPEAL NO. 893 OF 2006 APPEAL NO. 893 OF 2006 IN IN IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1145 OF 2005 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1145 OF 2005 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1145 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUIT NO. 1656 OF 2003 SUIT NO. 1656 OF 2003 SUIT NO. 1656 OF 2003 M/s.Unimin India Ltd., .. Appellant. V/s. M/s.Reifenhauser Gmbh & Co. .. Respondents. --- Mr.Murtaza Ali i/by M/s.Law Charter for the Appellant. --- CORAM : R.M.LODHA & S.A.BOBDE,JJ. CORAM : R.M.LODHA & S.A.BOBDE,JJ. CORAM : R.M.LODHA & S.A.BOBDE,JJ. DATED : 12th DECEMBER, 2006 DATED : 12th DECEMBER, 2006 DATED : 12th DECEMBER, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . We heard Mr.Murtaza Ali, the counsel for the Appellant. 2. The counsel submits that the Appellant Company is sick industrial undertaking and that a reference under section 15(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 has been registered before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction. If that be so, the Appellant may make appropriate application before the Chamber Judge for reconsideration of the matter. However, no case for -: 2 :- entertaining this Appeal arises. 3. Appeal is dismissed. (R.M.LODHA,J.) (S.A.BOBDE,J.) .....