IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 5224 of 2008. Decided on: 23.06.2010. __________________________________________________________ Rajinder. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:- “(i) That the respondents’ action in decreasing/lowering the pay and status of the applicant from that of a Pipe Fitter to that of Beldar may kindly be quashed and set aside. (ii) That the respondents be directed to pay the applicant wages of daily wage of pipe-fitter w.e.f. July 98 onwards in which post and capacity the applicant is working. (iii) That the respondents be directed to regularise the services of the applicant as a Pipe-fitter.” 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2. It has come in the reply that the petitioner has already filed an Original Application No.1160 of 1998 before the erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal seeking the following reliefs:- “(i) That the respondents may be restrained from reverting the applicant as Beldar from the grade of fitter.” 3. The Original Application No.1160 of 1998 is prior in time. It was not open to the petitioner to file the present petition seeking same or similar reliefs, which he had claimed in Original Application No.1160 of 1998. The petitioner has concealed this material information from this Court by stating that he has not filed any other petition on the same or similar grounds for the same relief. The litigants must place all the facts before the Court and no fact should be concealed. Since the petitioner has already filed Original Application No.1160 of 1998 before the erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Tribunal for the redressal of his grievance, the present petition is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. June 23, 2010. (sck).