RESPONDENTS /• ^ € IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.Y . WRrTPETmON fC.) N0. o<vo'u ^ OF 2011 PETITIONER : ^' Manohar Lal Manglani, S/o Late Shri Chiju Lal Manglani, aged about 65 years, R/o Subhash Ward, Kanker (Manjhapara), Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS • State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary,. Town Administration Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector, Kanker, Disfrict North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 3. ChiefMunidpal Officer, Municipality Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 4. Municipality Kanker, Through: President, Municipality Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA A^ ,^^g> r^^p^ ^yy ^y^ ^ ^' l-tl^ ©©iyR'K©RG]-)l-IATTlS©ARH:BILASPUR 1 \WR ^^ NQ.266J1 OR 201 1 RETITIQNER Manohar LalManglani RESPONDENTS Versus State ofChhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under ArtJGles 226 of the Gonstitution of India) Single BenCh : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri P.P. Sahu, Advocates for the petitioner. ShriShashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri Rahul Tamaskar, Advooate appears on behaff 6f Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Advocate for the respondents No.3 & 4. ^ ORDER(ORAL) . (Passed on this 12th day of July, 2011) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No.3 & 4 submits thatthe issue involved herein shall be looked into by the respondents No.3 & 4 and proper actionshall be taken, in aceordance with law. 2. In view of foregoing, accordingtothe learned coynsel appearingfor the petitioner nothing survives in this petition foradjudiGation. 3. AGcordingly,thewritpetitionisdispos6dof. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge