1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR C.A.O. NO. 948/09 AND M.C.A. ST. NO. 15059/09 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 9022/08 Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation .vs. Shree Rangnath Maharaj Sansthan & others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATE : 18 th FEBRUARY, 2010. Heard Mr. A.B. Patil, learned Advocate for applicant and Mr. Kakde, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 2 & 3. This is an application moved by the appellant Corporation for seeking condonation of delay. Mr. Patil submits that the delay caused is purely unintentional and because of the communication gap. Mr. Patil further submits that the notices were issued on the condonation of delay application and for want of correct address, the notices could not be served. The learned Advocate submits that now the correct address of respondent no.1 is available with him and the same will be submitted to the 2 office. The learned Advocate further submits that appeals arising out of the common judgment and award passed by the Reference Court are admitted by this Court. In view of these submissions and for the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned. Civil Application No. 948/09 is allowed. M.C.A. ST. NO. 15059/09 Heard Mr. A.B. Patil, learned Advocate for applicant and Mr. Kakde, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 2 & 3. For the reasons stated in the application in paragraph nos. 2 to 5, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Judge J.