1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 353 OF 2011 (Babanrao Ramdasji Wankhede .vs. State and anr.) ................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................ CORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED : 15th July, 2011. Heard Mr.M.P.Kariya, Adv. for the applicant, Mr.M.K.Pathan, A.P.P. for respondent no.1/State and Mr.V.S.Dhote, Adv. for respondent no.2. It is submitted that, in view of compromise between the first informant Firoz Akbar Ali Siddhikot and the applicant herein in writing on the duly signed paper, the first informant has now entered into a compromise and settlement in respect of the claim in respect of sale of land between the first informant and the present accused. Under these circumstances, the first informant has already admitted that F.I.R. No.72 of 2011, dt. 31.5.2011 was lodged at Police Station, Samudrapur, Distt. Wardha on account of misunderstanding between the parties. They have no grudge or complaint against each other in view of the Compromise Deed dt.28.6.2011, 2 copy of which is annexed with the application. Under these circumstances, the learned Advocate for the applicant prays for quashing of F.I.R. in this case. Reference is made to the ruling in the case of Jagdish Chanana and Ors. vs. State of Haryana and another reported in 2008 ALL MR (Cri) 1299 (SC) in order to submit that since compromise has been recorded in writing between the parties, they are ready to bury the differences between them. Under these circumstances, continuance of Criminal Proceedings initiated by F.I.R. No. 72 of 2011 would be a futile exercise as there would be no chance of conviction. Hence, the F.I.R. No.72 of 2011 is quashed and set aside. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed of accordingly. JUDGE jais