HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.SURI APPA RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1042 OF 2007 Monday, the Seventh day of February, Two Thousand and Eleven Between The State of A.P., Rep.by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. Appellant AND Akela Suryanarayana Murthy Respondent THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble Sri Justice V.Suri Appa Rao) This appeal is preferred by the State against the judgment dated 8.11.2004 passed in Sessions Case No. 369 of 2002 by the learned Sessions Judge, East Godavari at Rajahmundry, acquitting the sole accused- respondent herein under Sec. 235(1) Cr. P.C. for the offence under Sec. 302 IPC. The case of the prosecution, briefly stated, is as follows: The deceased Akella Surya Bramaramba was wife of the accused. Their marriage took place 19 years prior to the incident and since ten years prior to the incident, they were living separately on the ground that the accused was suspecting fidelity of the deceased. The accused had been residing at Kadiapulanka after deserting the deceased and the deceased was residing at her parent’s house at Kesavaram. Subsequently, the deceased completed graduation and started working as Vidya Volunteer in MP Elementary School, Sampathanagaram, which is at a distance of three kilometers from Kesavaram. She used to go to Sampathanagaram every day and used to return to Kesavaram. The house of PW-8 Badireddy Appa Rao is at a distance of 50 yards from the house of the deceased. Even after desertion, the accused started demanding the deceased to join with him or give divorce to him, to which the deceased refused and the elders of the locality directed father of the accused to give undertaking to the effect that the accused would treat the deceased properly, but his father declined to give such an undertaking on the ground that he had no confidence in his son and that even if he gives such an undertaking, the accused might not abide by the undertaking. Therefore, the attempt for mediation failed. Thereafter, fifteen days prior to the incident, the accused intensified his verbal attacks and used to threaten the deceased over phone. On one occasion, the accused rang PW-9 Chevvuri Venkata Subba Rao and requested him to call the deceased and when the deceased’s parents answered the phone call, the accused abused the deceased and demanded divorce from her. Again on 10.6.2002 and 11.6.2002, he also rang the said Venkata Subba Rao and attributed immorality to the deceased. On 12.6.2002 i.e. two days prior to the incident, the accused rang PW-7 Gunturi Gangaratnam, sister of the deceased and informed her that he would do away with the deceased, as the deceased did not mend her conduct and refused to give divorce to him. PW-7 informed the same to the deceased and the deceased informed PW-7 that she has also received threatening calls from the accused. Thereafter, the deceased informed PW-8 Badireddy Appa Rao about the threats of the accused and requested her for help, as he was mediator, to settle the issue between them. While so, on 14.6.2002 when PW-2 Pampanaboina Muralikrishna, who is working as Secondary Grade Teacher in M.P. Elementary School, Sampathanagaram, was taking lunch at 12.30 p.m. the accused went to him, enquired as to the whereabouts of the deceased when PW-2 was taking lunch in zinc sheet roofed room, PW-2 directed the accused to RCC roofed room and infirmed him that the deceased was taking her lunch there. Thereafter, PWs 3 and 4 Chilakalapudi Macharamma and Sarikonda Kantam heard cries from the RCC roofed room and noticed the accused hurriedly going away from the school premises. Therefore, they raised alarm and on hearing the alarm of PWs 3 and 4, PW-2 came out from the room, as he had already finished his lunch, went to the RCC roofed room where the deceased was taking her lunch and found the deceased lying in a pool of blood. Meanwhile, the accused tried to take to heels, at the instigation of PWs. 3 and 4, PW-5 Chilakalapudi Chandra Rao and another villager, chased him and caught hold of the accused, who was having blood stains on his clothes. PW-5 and another brought back the accused to the school premises. After seeing the dead body of the deceased in a pool of blood, PW-2 immediately rushed to PW-1 Nanduri Bapanna Panthuly, Panchayat Secretary, Sampathnagaram and sought help. PWs. 1 and 2, thereafter rushed back to the school and found dead body of the deceased. After the accused was brought back to the school premises by PW-5 and others, on being questioned the accused stated that since the deceased gave prevaricating and unassuming replies, he confessed to have stabbed her with MO-1 knife. The accused was pushed into the room where the dead body was lying and the doors of the room were bolted from outside. PW-1 then sent a word to Rajanagaram Police Station and PW- 12 R.V.S.N.Murthy, Sub-Inspector of Police, Rajangaram, rushed to the scene of offence with his staff and reached school at 1.30 p.m. where PW-1 lodged complaint Ex.P-1 and he endorsed on the same and sent it to the P.S. Rajanagaram Police Station, where, PW-14 K.Appa Rao, Head Constable attached to Rajanagaram Police Station, registered the same as Crime No. 94 of 2002 under Sec. 302 IPC at 4.00 p.m. The Sub-Inspector of Police, PW-12 went to the scene of offence and unbolted the room and found the dead body of the deceased and on questioning the accused, he confessed to have committed the offence and produced MO-1 knife. PW-12 got the scene of offence observed and prepared the observation report Ex.P-2, drafted and attested by PW-1 and the accused also attested Ex.P-2. He also seized a tiffin carrier and slippers of the deceased from the scene of offence apart from seizing M.Os. 4 to 7 blood-stained earth, control earth, blood stained wall piece and control wall piece. As the accused was suffering with an injury on the right palm, PW-12 sent the accused to Government Headquarters Hospital, Rajahmundry for treatment. PW-13 Dr. C.Lakshmipathi, Civil Assistant Surgeon, Govt. Headquarters Hospital, Rajahmundry, treated the accused and issued Ex.P-24 wound certificate. The Investigating Officer seized blood stained clothes of the accused M.Os. 8 and 9. Thereafter, PW-12 sent the dead body of the deceased for post mortem examination on the same day. PW-10 Dr.B.Chaitanya Sekhar, Civil Assistant Surgeon, Dist. Headquarters Hospital, Rajahmundry, conducted autopsy over the dead body of the deceased at 12.30 p.m. on 15.6.2002 and found as many as 20 stab injuries and opined that the injuries are sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death of the deceased and the cause of death to the best of his knowledge is due to shock and haemorrhage due to multiple injuries. He issued Ex.P-6 post mortem certificate. After completion of the investigation, PW-12 filed charge sheet. The learned Sessions Judge framed a charge under Sec. 302 IPC against the accused. The accused denied the offence and pleaded not guilty. In order to bring home guilt of the accused for the offence under Sec. 302 IPC, prosecution examined PWs 1 to 14 and marked Exs. P-1 to P-24 and M.Os. 1 to 9. During the course of cross-examination of PWs 4 and 5, the defence got marked Exs. D-1 to D-4. Ina order to prove that the death of the deceased was homicidal, prosecution examined PW-10 Dr. B.Chaitanya Sekhar, Civil Assistant Surgeon, Government Headquarters Hospital, Rajahmundry, who conducted post mortem examination over the dead body of the deceased and issued Ex.P-6 post mortem certificate. According to PW-10, he conducted post mortem examination on 16.2.2002 at 12.20 p.m. and found the following ante mortem injuries: 1. A stab injury on the hest below the right collar bone oblique with clean cut edges on vertical line with the right nipple 1½ cm 1/3 cm X 3 cm tapering inside elliptical; 2. A stab injury 2 cm lateral to outer boarder of right areola vertical 1½ x ½ cm x deep into the right lung tapering inside spindle shaped, clean cut edges antero posterior in direction. 3. A stab injury on right lateral chest wall on anterior axillary line horizontal 2 cm x 1 cm x deep into right lung tapering inside spindle shaped with clean cut edges. 4. A stab injury on right coastal margin area in the vertical line right nipple 1½ x 1 cm deep into the liver tapering inside edges clean cut spindle shaped oblique and upwards. 5. A stab injury on right lateral chest wall on a level about the middle of 3rd and 4th injury and lateral to them 3 cm x 1 cm x deep into right lobe of ht liver tapering inside spindle shaped oblique with clean edges in horizontal direction. 6. A stab injury on right lateral abdominal wall below the level of umbilicus oblique 3 cm x ½ cm x deep into the liver antero posterior in direction tapering. 7. A stab injury on antero posterior aspect of right gluteal regions oblique 2 cm x ½ cm x 4 cm deep edges clean cut. 8. An incised injury on right lateral and anterior aspect of right gluteal aspect of oblique 6 cm x 1 cm x 3 cm deep edges clean cut. 9. A stab injury in the middle of posterio lateral aspect of right side of chest wall 3 cm x ½ cm x deep into the liver tapering inside edges clean cut oblique in direction. 10. An incised injury on the back of left shoulder 1 cm x ½ cm x 1 cm 11. An incised injury on the back in upper thoracic spine region 3 cm lateral to mid line on right side oblique 2 cm x 1 cm x 3 cm deep tapering with clean cut edges. 12. An incised injury on the back in the region of T3 vertebra horizontal 2 cm x 1 cm x ½ cm edges clean cut spindle shaped. 13. An incised injury left to the mid line and below injury No.12 oblique 1 cm x ½ cm x 1½ cm spindle shaped edges clean cut 14. An incised injury on the back at T4 vertebra level oblique 3 cm x 1 cm x 2 cm deep spindle shaped with clean cut edges. 15. An incised injury on the back at the level of T 6-7 vertebra oblique 2 cm x ½ cm x 2 cm in the mid line edges clean cut. 16. An incised injury on the right upper lateral aspect of right scapular region 1 cm x 1 cm x bone deep spindle shaped edges clean cut. 17. A stab injury on the back at the level of thoraco lumbar spine 6 cm left to midline vertical 2 cm x 1 ½ cm x deep into the spleen tapering inside edges clean cut 18. An stab injury on the back at the level of lower thoracic vertebra on right side oblique 3 cm x ½ cm x deep into the liver in posterior direction edges clean cut spindle shaped. 19. An stab injury on the back at the level of upper lumber vertical on right side vertical 2 cm x ½ cm x deep into the right kidney tapering inside edges clean cut spindle shaped. 20. An incised injury on the right side of sacral region 6 cm x 2 cm x 2 cm edges clean cut spindle shaped. He was of the opinion that the cause of death of the deceased was due to shock and haemorrhage due to multiple injuries especially injuries to internal organs, right lung, liver, spleen, right kidney and they can be caused by a knife like MO-1 and are sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death of the deceased. Thus by examining PW-10, the Medical Officer, who conducted autopsy over the dead body of the deceased, the prosecution has proved that the deceased died a homicidal death. The next question that falls for consideration in this case is whether the accused caused death of the deceased by inflicting as many as 20 injuries on the deceased. According to the prosecution, the accused married the deceased about 19 years back and since ten years prior to the incident, they are living separately. The accused suspected fidelity of the deceased and, therefore, he was insisting the deceased to give divorce for which the deceased did not agree. There was mediation at the instance of both the parties before PW-8, but the same did not materialize. It is the case of the prosecution that after mediation failed, the accused bore grudge against the deceased and he used to threaten her over phone with dire consequences, if she did not give divorce. He also warned PW-7, sister of the deceased, two days prior to the incident that he gave time to the deceased to give divorce and the time given is about to expire and that there was no response or reaction from the deceased and that after expiry of the time, he would not hesitate to kill the deceased. After receiving such phone call, PW-7 also informed the deceased about it, who in turn informed the same to PW-9, who acted as an elder. It is the case of the prosecution that on 14.6.2002, the accused went to M.P. Elementary School, Sampathnagaram and asked PW-2 about the deceased and when PW-2 stated that the deceased was taking lunch in the RCC roofed room and showed the room where the deceased was taking lunch, few minutes thereafter, PW-2 heard cries of PWs. 3 and 4 and the accused was found briskly walking away from the RCC roofed room. Thereafter, PW-2 went inside the room and found the dead body of the deceased with multiple stab injuries. PW-3 has stated in her evidence that on the date of incident, she heard alarm from inside the school, by then PW-4 and herself were returning to their houses after fetching water in the pots and she noticed the accused coming out of the school gate. Therefore, they cautioned about the alarm of the teacher and about the accused coming out of the school. PW-5 and others apprehended the accused. PW-4 also stated in her evidence that on the date of incident herself and PW-3 were returning to their houses after drawing water into the pots and by the time they reached the vicinity of the school, they heard alarm of a female from inside the school and on looking at the school wherefrom they heard the alarm, they found the accused coming out of the school and taking to heels. Then they raised alarm and PW-2 came there and enquired about what had happened. They informed PW-2 about the accused running away. PW-2 went into the room where from the alarm came and they also accompanied and noticed dead body of the deceased lying in the room in the midst of pool of blood. According to her, PW-5 and one Prasada Rao ran after the accused and caught hold of him. Thus there is no eyewitness to the incident. Therefore the prosecution is relying on the circumstantial evidence to prove the guilt of the accused. The learned Sessions Judge observed that there are discrepancies and contradictions in the evidence of PWs. 2, 3 and 4 and, therefore, he disbelieved their evidence and found the accused not guilty for the offence under Sec.302 IPC. In order to prove the circumstantial evidence, the prosecution has to establish the chain of events which lead to an irresistible conclusion that it is the accused and accused alone and none else, who has committed the offence in the given circumstances. According to the prosecution, PW-2 is the first person, who informed the accused about the location of the deceased where she was taking lunch and that the accused went towards the RCC roofed room, where she was taking lunch and after hearing cries of the deceased, PWs 3 and 4, who happened to go by the side of the school with their water pots, raised alarm on hearing the cries of a lady from RCC roofed room and cautioned the presence of the accused by raising hue and cry. Then PW-5 and others caught hold of the accused when PW-3 and 4 informed about the accused trying to fled away from the place. PW-2 went inside the RCC roofed room where the deceased was taking food and found her dead body with multiple stab injuries. Immediately the accused was caught. PWs 2 to 5 noticed the dead body of the deceased in a pool of blood and, therefore, PW-5 and others pushed the accused into the room where the dead body was lying and bolted the room from outside and after the police came to the scene of offence, they opened the door and questioned the accused. The prosecution further relies on the confessional statement of the accused to connect him with the crime. Ex.P-2 is the observation report drafted by the Panchayat Secretary, PW-1, who gave Ex.P-1 complaint. PW-1 also supported the prosecution case. His evidence is that by the time he came to the scene of offence, after being informed by PW-2 about the incident, he found PW-5 and one Prasada Rao apprehended a person and also found the dead body of the deceased in a pool of blood. He then enquired with the person who had been apprehended by PW-5 and others, he informed him that the deceased was his wife and he had quarreled with his wife and they were not living together and he came to the school and tried to attack the deceased, as she gave arrogant replies and in accordance with the preplan, he stabbed the deceased indiscriminately with a view to kill her. PW-1 also informed that PW-5 and others apprehend him out of suspicion on hearing the cries of the deceased. Ex.P-2 observation report and mediator’s report was attested by PW-1 Panchayat Secretary, who gave Ex.P1 complaint about the death of the deceased. Admittedly, the incident took place during the school hours at about 12.45 p.m. the accused entered into the school, enquired about the deceased and on coming to know from PW2, who is also working as school teacher, that she was taking lunch in the RCC roofed room, he went there and stabbed her indiscriminately. The evidence of PW-3 and 4 clearly indicates that after hearing the cries of a female, they saw towards the school and found the accused coming out from the school briskly and on suspicion at the instigation of PWs 3 and 4, PW-5 and other villagers, caught hold of the accused. PW-2 noticed the dead body of the deceased. All of them took the accused inside the room where the dead body of the deceased was lying and bolted the room. The circumstances clearly indicate that except the accused, none has entered the room where the deceased was taking food. Admittedly, the pupils were also out of the room during lunch hours and taking advantage of the loneliness of the deceased, when the deceased did not agree for giving divorce, the accused inflicted as many as 20 injuries on the person of the deceased with MO-1 knife and caused her instantaneous death. The circumstantial evidence adduced by the prosecution indicates that on being informed by PW-2, the accused alone had the access to the RCC roofed room, where she was taking lunch. Ex. P-2 mediator’s report clearly indicates that there was a steel box found opened on the table containing cooked rice and curry and cooked rice was also found in the right hand of the deceased and there were blood stains present on the table, bench and the wall as well. Therefore, it is clear that when the deceased was about to take her lunch, the accused attacked her with a knife. Learned Sessions Judge at paragraph No. 16, observed that the time of death as propounded by the prosecution does not correlate with the evidence of PW-10 regarding the food contents in the stomach of the deceased. PW-10 in his evidence has clearly stated that the deceased should have consumed food about three hours prior to the death. Ex.P-2 observation report clearly shows that cooked rice and curry were found in the steel box, which was kept on the table and some cooked rice is also found in the right hand of the deceased. Therefore, it is clear that by the time of attack, she has not at all consumed any food. Obviously she must have consumed the food three or four hours prior to the incident i.e. before attending the school. It is also an admitted fact that the accused had a lacerated injury on his right palm. According to the opinion of PW-13, who treated the accused, the said injury is said to have been caused by a sharp object by the accused himself on the same day. The evidence of PW-13 shows that the injury found on the person of the accused can be caused with MO-1 knife, which was seized from the possession of the accused immediately after the incident, which was also used for commission of the offence. The accused has not properly explained during the course of 313 Cr. P.C. examination, as to how he sustained lacerated injury on the right palm. Therefore, in view of the injury found on the person of the accused and in the light of evidence of PWs 2 to 5, the presence of the accused prior to the incident and after the incident, cannot be doubted. Learned Sessions Judge also found that the accused was treated at Government Hospital at about 9.30 p.m., though he was arrested at 4.30 p.m. The evidence of PW-12 and the Head Constable PW-13 clearly shows that the accused and all of them remained at the scene of offence for completion of the drafting of panchanamas till 6.00 p.m. and after seizure of the material objects and preparation of the panchanamas and recording the statements of the witnesses, the accused was entrusted to the constable and he was sent for medical examination to the Government Hospital, Rajahmundry, which is at a distance of 15 KMs. from the scene of offence. Therefore, there was no delay in examining the accused by the Medical Officer for the injury said to have been received by him. Further, admittedly, PWs 1 to 5 and 7 are independent witnesses. Neither they have any interest in the prosecution nor animosity against the accused to implicate him in a grave crime. Though there are discrepancies in the evidence of PWs 3 and 4 about the exact place where the accused was caught, their evidence cannot be doubted about the presence of accused near the school premises immediately after the occurrence. The circumstantial evidence, thus produced by the prosecution, irresistibly leads to the conclusion that it is the accused and accused alone and none else, who is responsible for the death of the deceased. Therefore, it leaves us in no doubt that the learned Sessions Judge, East Godavari at Rajahmundry, was not right in acquitting the accused. Hence, the Criminal Appeal is allowed setting aside the judgment dated 8.11.2004 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, East Godavari at Rajahmundry, in Sessions Case No. 369 of 2002, acquitting the accused of the charge under Sec. 302 IPC. Consequently, the accused is found guilty for the offence under Sec.302 IPC and is convicted under Sec. 235(2) Cr. P.C. and sentence to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default thereof to suffer simple imprisonment of one month. The accused is entitled to the benefit of set off, as contemplated under Sec.428 Cr. P.C. The accused shall surrender before the learned Sessions Judge, East Godavari at Rajahmundry, to serve out the sentence now awarded. The Trial Court may also issue warrant of arrest against the accused to serve the