1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18/08/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR Writ Petition (MD)No.9252 of 2011 S.R.Premnath S/o.S.N.Rajarao Plot No.445 Mosque Street Anna Nagar seventh cross street Madurai – 625 020 ... Petitioner Vs 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Secretary to Government Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner, Commissioner of Municipal Administration Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai. 3.The Commissioner Madurai Corporation, Alagarkoil Road, Madurai. 4.Assistant Commissioner West Zone,Madurai Corporation. ... Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to grant all retirement service benefits to the petitioner from the date of retirement dated 31.01.2011 by considering the representation preferred by the petitioner dated 09.03.2011. For petitioner ...Mr.R.Alagumani For respondent ...Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen RR1 and RR2 Addl. Government Pleader RR3 and 4 Mr.M.Ravishankar O R D E R Seeking for a mandamus, directing the respondents to grant all retirement benefits to the petitioner from the date of his retirement, dated 31.01.2011, by considering the representation, dated 09.03.2011, the writ petition has been filed. 2. According to the petitioner, he was appointed as a Junior Assistant, Madurai Corporation, on 10.10.1977 and after rendering unblemished service of 34 years, he retired on 31.01.2011. It is his further case that all the departments in Madurai Corporation have given no objection certificate. It is the grievance of the petitioner https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 that though, no disciplinary proceedings or charges are pending against him, the retirement benefits have not been granted so far and therefore, he was constrained to submit a representation, dated 09.03.2011, which has not been responded and hence he has filed the present writ petition. 3. Mr.M.Ravishankar was directed to take notice for the respondents 3 and 4. 4. Considering the grievance expressed by the petitioner that his retiral benefits have been withheld from 31.01.2011, this Court is inclined to issue a direction to the Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, the third respondent herein, to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 09.03.2011 and pass appropriate orders, if no disciplinary proceedings or charges/investigation/trial is pending, within a period of one month, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(Writs) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Secretary to Government Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner, Commissioner of Municipal Administration Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai. 3.The Commissioner Madurai Corporation, Alagarkoil Road, Madurai. 4.Assistant Commissioner West Zone, Madurai Corporation. +1cc to Mr.R.Alagumani,Advocate, Sr.No.28067 +one cc to Special Government Pleader, Sr.No.28510 Writ Petition No.9252 of 2011 18.08.2011 RR SMA/7.9.2011/7C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/