IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5896 of 1993 with SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 10478 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- GUJARAT STATE CONSUMERS PROTECTION Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR GI DESAI for Petitioner in SCA 5896/93 MR ANMOL SHARAN for petitioner in SCA 10478/99 MR DIGANT JOSHI AGP for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR Date of decision: 26/06/2000 COMMON ORAL JUDGEMENT #. In both these petitions, a question is raised before this Court for establishment of Family Courts at various places, as contemplated under the Family Courts Act. Rule in Spl.C.A. No. 10478/99. Mr. Digant Joshi, learned AGP and Mr. Paresh Upadhyay, learned advocate waives service of rule on behalf of respondent nos. 1 & 2 respectively. #. On behalf of the petitioner, Anmol Sharan in Special Civil Application No. 10478/99, has argued at length and submitted that the petitioner is not personally interested in litigation and the petitioner is only interested in seeing that there is establishment of courts so that the matters are disposed off quickly and the family disputes can be resolved at the earliest. It is the anxiety of every one to see that the disputes are disposed off at the earliest. It is the desire of every one to see that not only the dispute with regard to family matters but also the matters regarding other issues are disposed off quickly. #. There was a proposal for establishment of family courts in so far as it relates to area of Ahmedabad city and the area under the Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority concerned. Very recently, the Courts have been established. The Under Secretary, Legal Department has pointed out in his affidavit that there was no proposal received by the State Government from the High Court for setting up of the family courts at other places. It is stated in the affidavit that as and when the proposal is received, the government will consider the same. #. In view of this, we do not think it necessary to entertain this petition any further. The State Government should consider the figures of cases and thereafter should take decision at the earliest in this regard. The petitions stand dismissed. Rule discharged in both the matters. ***** pirzada/-