IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.741 of 2008 1. Abhasiya Khatoon, wife of Maslehuddin Akhtar 2. Kasif Haidar, son of Md. Akhtar. 3. Imran 4.Akram, both minor sons of M. Akhtar under guardianship of natural guardian mother Abhasia Khatoon. 5. Shahin Parveen 6. Tahara Parveen 7. Shiri Parveen 8. Rumaisa Parveen 9. Humaira Parveen, all daughter of late M. Akhtar under guardianship of natural guardian and mother Abhasia Khatoon, all resident of Mohalla-Ward No.4/8. P.O., P.S.- Madhepura, District- Madhepura ----- Plaintiffs--- Petitioners. Versus 1. Shaukat Ali, son of late Azizur Rahman, resident of Mauza-Madhepura, Nagar Panchayat, Ward No.3/6, P.O., P.S. and District -Madhepura. 2. Md. Ahmad Zaki, son of late Shamsuddin Haidar, resident of Mauza-Madhepura, under Nagar Panchayat Ward No. 4/8, P.O., P.S. and District-Madhepura ----- Defendants----Opposite Parties. ---------------------------------- 5. 3.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. Amit Prakash for opposite party no.1. The plaintiffs of Title Suit No. 254 of 2003 have preferred this application under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, and challenges the validity of the order dated 13.2.2008, passed by the learned 3rd Additional Munsif, Madhepura, whereby he has held that the suit is not maintainable before him, and has returned the plaint under Order 7, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure on the ground of lack of 2 pecuniary jurisdiction. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties. It appears to us on a perusal of the impugned order and the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, that the learned trial court has passed an appropriate order in accordance with law. We agree with the same. The civil revision application is dismissed. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar, J.)