IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2110 of 2008 MOSTT. MITHILESH DEVI WIFE OF LATE JAGDISH PRASAD JHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BANKI, P.O.- BAHADURA, P.S. RUPAULI, DISTRICT- PURNEA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DISTRICT SUB-REGISTRAR, KISHANGANJ 3. THE DISTRICT SUB-REGISTRAR, PURNEA 4. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A &E), BIHAR PATNA ----------- 2 13.05.2010 Heard Ms. Papiya Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-Board. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State. No counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the payment has been made after good delay and as such the petitioner is entitled to the payment of interest. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.2. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today - 2 - along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable could also be paid. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)