IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 14805 of 2009 Between: 1 Bommanaboind Peda Munaiah, S/o. Venkata Reddy, R/o. Proddatur, Kadapa District. 2 Bommanaboind China Munaiah, S/o. Venkata Reddy, R/o. Proddatur, Kadapa District. 3 Bommanaboind Bala Munaiah, S/o. Venkata Reddy, on Adoption known as Adiboina Bala R/o. Proddatur, Kadapa District. 4 Adiboina Umendranath, S/o. Adiboina Bala Munaiah, R/o. Proddatur, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Andhra Pradesh State, Rep. by its District Collector, Kadapa District. 2 Tahasildar, Proddatur Mandal, Kadapa District. 3 Joint Sub-Registrar, Proddatur, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2, in classifying the land in Sy.No. 143 to an extent of Ac. 7.02 cents situated at Kothapet, Proddatur Mandal, Kadapa District as DKT lands, though it is a patta land, in certificate issued by Tahasildar in L.Dis/286/2008 dt. 08-02- 08 is illegal, unjust, and violate of Section 22-A(1) of the Registration Act, and further direct the respondents 2, to reclassify the land in sy.No. 143 to an extent of Ac. 7.02 cents situated at Kothapet, Proddatur Mandal, Kadapa District as private patta land, Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.RAMA SARMA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORAL ORAL: The substantive grievance in the writ petition is that private land now owned and in possession of the petitioners in S.Nos. 143/1, /143/2 and 143/3 of Kothapalli village, Proddatur Mandal, Kadapa District are being described as DKT patta lands in the revenue records. Such grievance is more appropriately addressed either by a proceeding under the provisions of the A.P. Rights in Lands and Pattadar Pass Books Act 1971 (for short ‘the 1971 Act’) or by seeking a declaratory relief before a civil court of competent jurisdiction. The learned Counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the writ petition to seek appropriate remedy either under the provisions of the 1971 Act or any other appropriate remedy, as advised. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought to pursue appropriate remedies. No order as to costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 23.7.2009. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 14805 of 2009. Dated: 23.7.2009.