1 CRA-505.09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.505 OF 2009 Smt. Radhabai Balbhim Sutar .... Applicant Vs. Aba Balbhim Sutar & Ors. .... Respondents Shri Vijay Mane for the Applicant. Shri K.B. Sonwalkar for the Respondents. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JULY 21, 2010 P.C: Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. First, it is doubtful whether a revision would lie against the order passed by the learned trial Judge whereby he had rejected the applicant s applications for stay of Darkhast and to restrain the decree holder from transferring the property under the Darkhast to any one else. Secondly, the order itself shows that the learned trial Judge has ordered the applicant to be joined as party to the execution proceedings. It is not clear as to how the applicant could be aggrieved by such an order. Thirdly, the prayers made in the 2 CRA-505.09 applications which have been rejected are totally beyond the scope of the Darkhast. Therefore, the revision application is thoroughly misconceived and is rejected. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)