IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 12TH APRIL 2011 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 2902 of 2011() ----------------------------- CRIME NO. 73 OF 2011 OF KANJIRAMKULAM POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 4 -------------------- 1. SANTHOSH, S/O YEASUDAS NANCHIVILAKOM VEEDU, THENOORKONAM, VIZHINJAM, FROM URIYARIKKUNNU, PURAYIDOM VEEDU PUTHIYATHURA, KARUMKULAM VILLAGE. 2. SAJU S/O.OUSEPH THEKKAKARA VEEDU, URIYARIKKUNNU, PUTHIYATHURA, KARUMKULAM VILLAGE. 3. DENNU S/O. JOOSA @ JOOSEPH PILLAI URIYARIKKUNNU, PURAYIDOM PUTHIYATHURA, KARUMKULAM VILLAGE. 4. SHAIJU, S/O.JOOSA VARIYOM THEKKAKARA VEEDU,KARUMKULAM VILLAGE. PUTHIYATHURA, KARUMKULAM VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER SMT.M.JAYASREE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ........................................ Bail Application No. 2902 of 2011 ....................................... Dated: 12-04-2011 ORDER Petitioners who are accused Nos. 1 to 4 in Crime No. 73 of 2011 of Kanjiramkulam Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 451, 366 A, 376 (2) (g), 342 and 427 read with Sec. 34 I.P.C. seek their enlargement on bail. A1 to A3 were arrested on 6-3- 2011 and A4 was arrested on 7-3-2011. 2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the B.A. No. 2902 of 2011 -:2:- extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioners, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Dated this the 12th day of April, 2011. Sd/- V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani/ /true copy/ P.S. to Judge