IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH PETITIONER RESPONDENTS AT BILASPUR w.P.(5)No. @zw /2oo9 / Sm'r. Rameshwar'i Singh, W/o Shri Jayan‘l' Kumar‘ Singh, aged abou‘r 55 years, Head Mas’rer‘, Govt Girl's Primary School, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Block —Bilha, Dis’r’r. Bilaspur (6.6.) VERSUS K, : 1. S‘rofe of Chha‘r‘risgar'h Through :— The Secretory, School Education Department D.K.S. / BhawanhRaipur (C.G.) 2. DirecTor of Public Insfr'ucfions, / ,Chha‘r‘risgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Districf Educafion Officer; Distt: Bilaspur (C.G.) CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. [2. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE 30) S XE “IT PETHLON {S} N0. 6384 3f 2099 Smt. Rameshwari Singh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRET PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTEON OF INDIA SB: Hoa’bk Shri Satish K. Agnihatri. J. Prssmt: Shri Anil Singh Rajput, Advecate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate for the State. PETETIONER ORDER (GRAL) (Passed on 06m day of November, 2009) Witix the consent of 1eame§ counsel ayyearing for the panties, :he petiiicn is heard finaily. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioger was appoimecl as Assistani Teacher on a fixed pay seaie of Rs.100-150/’— for a perioé of two years. Afier completion of two years probatioa, the petitioner was granted regular pay scale. Learned counsel further submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether the petitioner is entitled to reguiar pay scale with effect from the date of initiai agapointment or after completion of yrobation period. 2. The issue involved herein was corisidered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribtmal. Jabaipur (for skort “the SAT’) iii O.A.No.2745/89 (Afadimkant Yadu and 56 others vs. State 0f1l/I.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale we‘f the date of initiai agnpointrnent. The matter Was taken up to the Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court, uphoiding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitied to reguiar pay soaie from date of initial appointment. In View of the above submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e., the petitioner is granted iibeity to make a representation, if so advised; to consider the petitioner’s ease: if the petitioner stand on the same footings as per order passed by the SAT in ixfadkukant Yoda (supra) and subsequentiy confirmed by the Supreme Court in Speeiai Leave ‘r‘etition (Civil) Nor 6392/93 by order dated 3-l~l994 and grant reiief accordinaiv. 4/ In view of foregoing, the writ petition is disposed of. // , w M1 ‘/ Sd! Satish . Agdwo‘ti/ \ 3u¢ge 13