34 \ # % 14.12.2010 Present: Mr. Jai Gopal Gar, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr. U.L. Watwani, APP for the State. Respondent no. 2 in person. + Crl. M.C. 3864/2010 * Petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 were married sometimein the year 1999 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. On account of •9^ ' temperamentaldifferencesthey started living separatelysince 2001. On the complaintof respondentno.2, FIR in questionwas registered against petitionerno. 1 and his relativesi.e. petitionernos. 2 to 4. Petitionerno. 1 and respondentno. 2 have settled their dispute before the Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. Terms of settlementhave been recordedin the proceedingsheet dated 13^^ May, 2009 of Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma (Annexure M page nos. 56-57). In termsof the settlementpetitionerno. 1and respondentno. • 2 had decidedto partways. They have even obtaineddecreeof divorce by way of mutualconsentfrom the courtof AdditionalDistrictJudge, Delhion 22nd pebruaiy,2010. Balancesettledamountof Rs.40,000/- has been handed over to respondentno.2 by petitionerno.l in the court today. In view of the settlement, respondent no.2, who is Signing Date:03.08.2024 17:21:43 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified / y present in court, states that she has no objection if the FIR is quashed. Since both the parties have decided to part ways and, in fact, have obtained decree of divorce by way of mutual consent, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the FIR pending. Accordingly, in larger interest, FIR 267/2001 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPG registered at Trilokpuri and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. A.K. PATHAK, J. DECEMBER 14, 2010 ga .