30. $- :r e IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI w.P.(c) 2s612009 M/S CHOPRA MARKETING PVT.LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa & Mr. Amulya Dhingr4 Advocates. versus SH. AJAY GUPTA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar, Advocate for R- 1to5 Mr Ajay Arora & Mr. KaPil Dutt4 Advocates for MCD. AND w.P.(c) 2s7l2oo9 IWS CHOPRA MARKETING PVT.LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa & Mr. Amulya Dhingr4 Advocates. versus SH. AJAY GUPTA & ORS. Through: 31. + -1, ..... Respondents Mr. Sanat Kumar, Advocate for R- 1to5 Mr. Ajay Arora & Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advocates for MCD. AND 32. + w.P.(c) 2s812009 N4/S CHOPRA MARKETING PVT.LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa & Mr. Amulya Dhingr4 Advocates. 1/- Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified t tv versus SH. AJAY GUPTA & ORS. ....' Respondents Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar, Advocate for R- 1to5 Mr. Ajay Arora & Mr. KaPil Dutt4 Advocates for MCD. AND 33. + W.P.(C) 2s912009 IWS CHOPRA MARKETING PVT.LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa & Mr. Amulya Dhingr4 Advocates. SH. AJAY GUPTA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar, Advocate for R- Ito5 Mr Ajay Arora & Mr. Kapil Dutta Advocates for MCD. A.ND 34.+ w.P.(c) 26012009 I\4/S CHOPRA MARKETING PVT.LTD .... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa & Mr. Amulya Dhingr4 Advocates. versus SH. AJAY GUPTA & ORS. Through: .... Respondents Mr. Sanat Kumar, Advocate for R- Ito5 Mr. Ajay Arora & Mr. Kapil Dutt4 t/- Advocates for MCD. /r th l. 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJTV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER 09.11.2010 The counsels have mentioned the matter' The counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw these petitions to avail the alternative remedy and in which respect objection has been taken by the respondents no.l to 5 in their counter affidavits. The counsel for the respondents no.l to 5 and the counsel for the respondentno'7 MCD have no objection. 3. The petitions are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy io accordance with law. No order as to costs. RAJTV SAHAI ENDLAW'J NOVEMBER 09, PP.. \ 3/-