IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19059 of 2009 SHASHI MANDAL Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 08.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that though there is allegation of demand but for the purchase of a tempo cannot be for the purpose of family members, rather for the husband exclusive, marriage was 12 years ago, while petitioner was a minor only having no hand in family affairs that also of his brother, who was adopted by his uncle and residing at Dhanbad. Even then petitioner is apprehending his arrest which can never be justified. I agree with the submission of the leaned counsel. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 51 of 2008, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Jamui subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)