maicouRT OF CHHATTISGA'RH ATBILASPUR WntPetition(S)No. 4089 of2008 PETITIONER : Ganga Prasad Shukla aged about 47 years son of Shri Balmik Shukla, Resident of I.E.M. School, Jhagrakliand, District Korea (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : l. State ofChhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The District Education Officer, Korea, District Korea 3. Administrator/Principal I.E.M. School; Jhagrakhand, District Korea (CG). 4. The Director, Directorate, Public Institution, Pension Bada, Raipur (CG). (W1UT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF TIIE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Asnihotri, J.) Present : Shri R.K. Jaisvval; Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lavwer for the State, ORAL_ORDER- (Passed on 29th day ofJiily, 2008) 1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. The petitioner claims to be an Assistant Teacher, working in I.E.M. Schooi, Jhagrakhand, District Korea (CG), run and managed by the respondent No. 3. The petitioner without giving details as to what is the natiire of the School, why the teachers are at par with other teachers, has filed this petition, praying that the respondents be directed to grant benefits of 5 Pay Commission w.e.f. 01.01.1996. 3. Be that as it may, it is difficult to decide the issue involved fbr want of adequate materials with regard to grant of 5 Pay Commission to the employees, 4. This Court has already considered and decided the same issue on 06.02.2007 in the matter of A. Lall (Smt.) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others1 (W.P. No. 4108 of2005) and other connected matters. 5. It is not necessary to approach this Court directly when the law on a particular issue has already been settled. The petitioner niay make a representation to the concenied authorities, if so advised, in the iight of law settied by this Court in the matter of A. Lall (Smt) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Ofhers (Supra). 6. This petition is accordingly disposed ofwith the above stated iiberts7. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sahu ' 2007 (1) BLJ 265