IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MPM No.514 of 2009 Decided on : June 25, 2009 State of H.P. …Applicant. Versus Dalip Kumar and another …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Applicant : Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. For the Respondents : Nemo. Surjit Singh, J (Oral) Heard and gone through the record. 2. Respondents were driving two different cars, on 4th April, 2003. The cars appeared from opposite directions, at a place called TCP Holta-Palampur, and collided with each other. Occupants of the cars sustained minor injuries. 3. Matter was reported to the police. Police investigated the case and challaned both the respondents. During the course of trial, prosecution examined three witnesses to prove the charge of rash or negligent driving. They are PW-4 HC Ashok Kumar, PW-3 Ravinder Kumar and PW-5 Shalender Maine. None of the three witnesses stated that he saw the accident taking place or what was the act of rashness or negligence, on the part of either of the two Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …2… respondents, while driving their respective cars. Therefore, no fault can be found with the judgment of acquittal passed by the trial Court. Hence, the present petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. June 25, 2009(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J