THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.C. No. 1661 of 2008 Oral order: Alleging that the respondents have deliberately and willfully violated the order dated 20.07.2007, passed by this Court in W.P. No. 10584 of 2007, the petitioner filed the present contempt case, to punish the respondents for contempt. By the order, non-compliance of which the petitioner alleged in the contempt case, this Court directed the respondent-Corporation to declare the results of the interview, and if the petitioner is declared passed in the interview, then the respondent-Corporation shall consider his case for appointment as Contract Junior Lineman, if he is otherwise qualified and eligible for being appointed as such. Respondent No.2 filed counter stating that in compliance of the orders of this Court and the instructions issued by the Corporate Office, they have considered the case of the petitioner for the post of Contract Junior Lineman and found that the petitioner was not covered in the Common Merit List prepared at the time of appointment of Contract Junior Lineman vide Memo No. SE/O/ATP/PO/Adm/S3/ D.No. 179/97, dated 07.07.2007, and that they have also intimated the same to the Corporate Office, Hyderabad, vide Lr. No. SE/O/ATP/PO/Adm/S3/D. No. 263/2008, dated 04.02.2008. Since the name of the petitioner is said to have not been found in the common merit list, and there being no positive direction issued by this Court to appoint the petitioner as Contract Junior Lineman, non- appointing of the petitioner by the respondents to the post of Contract Junior Lineman, cannot be termed as violation of the order of this Court. The contempt case is devoid of merit, and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 15th December, 2010 KSR