CR No.5916 of 2009 - 1 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.5916 of 2009 Date of Decision: 14.10.2009 **** Gurjinderjit Singh . . . . Petitioner VS. Col. Gurmit Singh Chugh . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Naresh Jain, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate for the respondent **** SURYA KANT J.(ORAL) 1) This revision petition is directed by the tenant against the order dated 03.10.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, whereby, his evidence was closed by Court orders. 2) Notice of motion. Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-landlord. 3) It prima facie appears that the petitioner is adopting delaying tactics and has failed to lead his evidence despite sufficient opportunities granted to him. 4) Be that as it may and in the interest of justice, one more and last opportunity is granted to the petitioner-tenant subject to payment of cost of Rs.3000/- to the respondent-landlord. CR No.5916 of 2009 - 2 - 5) It is directed that the petitioner shall produce his remaining evidence at his own responsibility on the date fixed i.e. 15.10.2009. No further opportunities shall be granted to the petitioner and the Rent Controller, Chandigarh shall proceed in accordance with law and decide the case on merits. 6) Disposed of. 7) Let a copy of this order, duly attested by the Bench Secretary, be made available to the parties during the course of the day. 8) Dasti also. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 14.10.2009 shonkar