1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION P.I.L. W.P. NO.3001 OF 2005 1. Ms.Maharukh Adenwalla & anr. Petitioners vs. 1. State of Maharashtra & ors. Respondents Mr.P.A.Sebastian i/b.Ms.Monica Sakharani for the petitioners. Mrs.U.V.Kejriwal, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr.Majid Memon-respondent no.6 present. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 15th February 2006 P.C. Heard Mr.P.A.Sabastian, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Majid Memon-respondent no.6 in person. 2. We are informed that prosecution evidence in Sessions Case No.87/2002 @ 886 of 2004 @ 795 of 2005 is over and the statement of the accused persons is being recorded under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Mr.Memon also informs us that after the statement of the accused persons under Section 313 is over, the oral arguments in the sessions case shall begin. 3. In view thereof, we are satisfied that nothing 2 further is required to be gone into in this writ petition. 4. However, as regards the allegations levelled against the petitioner, she is free to pursue separate remedy, if so advised. (R. (R. (R. M. LODHA, J.) M. LODHA, J.) M. LODHA, J.) (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)