1 CP-263.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.263 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6279 OF 2009 Zamir Abdul Sattar Shaikh .... Petitioner Vs. Swadin Kshatriya & Ors. .... Respondents Shri K.R. Jagdale for the Petitioner. Shri M.M. Malvankar for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JULY 23, 2010 P.C: This petition complains of disobedience of an order of this Court passed on 23-11-2009 in Writ Petition No.6279 of 2009. The relevant part of the order reads thus: "3. However, the petitioner may apply to the respondent No.1. If such an application is made within one month from today the respondent No.2 may consider his case sympathetically for ad-hoc appointment if there be any vacancy available and otherwise eligible for appointment." 2 CP-263.10 The learned counsel for the respondent- Corporation states that the applications filed by the petitioner were duly considered and by letter dated 12-7-2010, addressed to the petitioner, the Corporation has decided that the petitioner was not eligible for re- employment and, therefore, his request was rejected. It cannot, therefore, be said that the Corporation has not considered the case of the petitioner, as directed by this Court by order dated 23-11-2009. Whether the Corporation has decided his applications rightly or wrongly cannot be said to a subject-matter of this petition and for this the petitioner may take out separate proceedings. The petition is disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)