1 FCA10-2006.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.10 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.107 OF 2006 Neeta Rakesh Jain ..Appellant Vs Rakesh Jeetmal Jain ..Respondent -- Mr.B.S.Mahajan, for appellant. Ms.Manjula Rao, for respondent. -- CORAM : V.C.DAGA & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 18 th JANUARY, 2011 P.C: Perused petition. 2] Heard learned counsel for the rival parties. Perused the consent terms. 3] The petition filed under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 shall be treated to have been amended and filed under Section 13(1)(B) of the said Act. 4] Both the parties i.e.appellant and respondent are present in the Court. They are identified by their respective Advocates. The consent terms are signed by the appellant and respondent and their respective 2 FCA10-2006.sxw Advocates. The consent terms found to be reasonable. The Demand Drafts have also been handed over by learned counsel for the respondent to learned counsel for the appellant. Photocopies thereof are also placed on record along with consent terms. Both the parties submit that the Appeal may be disposed of in terms of the consent terms. 5] Accordingly, on the joint motion made by the parties, Family Court Appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. The impugned judgment and decree stands modified and stands substituted with that of consent terms. Appeal accordingly stands disposed of as settled with no order as to the costs. 6] In view of disposal of the Family Court Appeal, no further orders are necessary on Civil Application No.107 of 2006 and the same stands disposed of with no order as to the costs. [R.G.KETKAR, J.] [V.C.DAGA, J.]