IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No. 702 of 1995 Date of Decision: July 12, 2011 Sham Lal. . ….Petitioner Versus Mr. Kulwant Rai and another. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: None. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) I have gone through the record. As per the averment given in written statement by the respondents in the shape of affidavit, they have paid all the compensation amount to the petitioner. As such, the grievance of the petitioner as made out in the present contempt petition, no longer survives. If there is any dispute qua the calculations, the same can be resolved in the execution proceedings. For delay of payment, respondent No.2 in his written statement tendered an unqualified apology, which is accepted. Present petition is disposed of accordingly. July 12, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge