IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 3751 of 2008. Decided on: October 26, 2010. Gurnam Singh …..Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioners: None. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K.Bawa, AG, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G., for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. D.K.Khanna, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayers: “i) That the impugned Annexures A-2 & A-3, dated 1st Dec., 1995 & 30th March, 1996 may be quashed and set aside; ii) That the appointment of the Respondent No.4 pursuant to Annexure: A-4, dated 16th August, 1996 as Lecturer in Physical Education on contract basis in Govt. Degree College, Nalagarh, be quashed and set aside;” 2. In the reply, at paragraph 3, it is stated as follows: “3. That the application is not maintainable against the orders Annexure A-2. The services of the applicant ceased on the completion of contract. The applicant being a contract appointee cannot be allowed to work beyond the contract period. Hence, the application is totally devoid of any merit.” 3. In case the petitioner has still any grievance left with regard to the issue, it will be open to him to approach the second respondent, in which case, the matter will be duly considered by the said respondent and appropriate action in accordance with law will be taken within another four months. 2 4. The Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. October 26, 2010. ( Justice Kuldip Singh ), (karan) Judge.