IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU WRIT PETITION NO.19921 OF 2002 DATED:19.08.2010 Between: K. Kurma Rao … Petitioner And The Pharmacy Council of India, Rep. by its Registrar-cum-Secretary Cobined Councils Buildings, Temple Lane Kotla Road, Alwan-E-Ghalibmarg Post Box No.7020, New Delhi and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU WRIT PETITION NO.19921 OF 2002 ORDER: The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is a displaced person, therefore entitled to treatment as envisaged by Section 32B of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (for short, the Act). Parties are at variance on some facts having direct bearing on the legal issues petition on hand has given rise. Situated thus in my opinion, ends of justice would be met by directing the respondents to examine the claim of the petitioner for registration afresh in accordance with law and while doing so they shall have to take into account Section 32B of the Act as well. Disposed of. NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ 19.08.2010 B. Narsinga Rao