1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2125 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 300 OF 2009 1 Babruwan s/o Dilip Gaikwad 2 Vilas s/o Dilip Gaikwad 3 Satish s/o Nashik Gaikwad .. APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra .. RESPONDENT Shri A.S. Shivpuje, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Dilip Bankar Patil, APP for the State. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 1 st July, 2009. PER COURT : 1 Applicants are convicted for offence punishable under section 307 r/w section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for four years to to pay fine of Rs. 100/- each, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 15 days. Accused are prosecuted in Sessions Case no. 85/2008 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur. The order of conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court is issued on 17-6-2009. It is stated that accused were directed to continue to remain in jail during the course of trial and there is no complaint to the effect that they have misused 2 the liberty. 2 Considering the sentence imposed by the trial court, it is proper to direct suspension of sentence of imprisonment imposed against the accused. Application is therefore allowed. Substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed against the accused in Sessions Case no. 85/2008 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur on 17-6-2009 stands suspended and the accused are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with one surety for the like amount. It is stated that the accused have deposited the amount of fine. Application stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/criappln2125.09.odt