IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16700 of 2011 Amar Kumar @ Munna Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 24.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 27(b)(ii),27(d),28,28A and 36A of the Drug and Costomatic Act. It is alleged that certain medicines were being carried when the petitioner shown forged documents. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the medicines were of M/S. Sati Distributors and the petitioner was only an employee and the medicines have been released in favour of the proprietor. It is further submitted that the complainant for the same occurrence lodged Jakkanpur P.S. Case No. 40 of 2010 against the petitioner in which the petitioner is already on bail. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on 2 bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 507(C-2) of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)