IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 5448 of 2008. Decided on: 28th October, 2010. Anjana Devi. …Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent No. 4. : Mr. S.D. Vasudeva, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that she has not been heard before the issuance of Anneuxures A-1 and A-2, dated 28.08.1998 and 04.12.1998, respectively. This position is not disputed. Petitioner has suffered civil and evil consequences. 2. Consequently, the petition is allowed. Annexures A- 1 and A-2, dated 28.08.1998 and 04.12.1998 are quashed and set aside. However, liberty is reserved to the respondents to proceed with the matter, in accordance with law. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 28, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?