THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3747 of 2009 DATE:07.09.2009 Between: T. Karunakar Reddy and others ... Petitioners and T. Ramakistaiah and others ... Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3747 of 2009 ORDER: Assailing the order dated 16.07.2009 passed by the learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge at Mahabubnagar in I.A.No.98 of 2009 in O.S.No.4 of 2001, the petitioners-defendants 3 to 7 filed the present civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2. The case of the petitioners is that the court below marked a document, which was drafted in Urdu language, as Ex.A.3, though they raised an objection stating that a translated copy of the document in English language made by an officially licenced translator has to be placed enabling them to know the contents and writings of the document. Questioning the same, they filed an application in I.A.No.98 of 2009 before the court below seeking to furnish a translated copy of Ex.A.3 in English language by a licenced translator so as to enable them to cross-examine P.W.1, but, the court below dismissed the said application. Aggrieved by the same, they filed the present revision. 3. Heard both sides. 4. Simply by marking a document as an exhibit, it cannot be said that the document has become heart of a record and it is admitted. Whether the translated version of the document is correct or not, is again a matter of evidence. Now that a document is marked as an exhibit, in my considered view, it would become a public document. Therefore, the petitioners herein can obtain a certified copy of the document in question, get it translated by their own translator and submit the same before the court stating that the contents as canvassed by the 1st respondent herein are not correct. Further, the court below has given a finding that the document in question will be taken into consideration at the time of resolving the dispute. 5. For the aforesaid reasons, this Court is of the view that this civil revision petition is misconceived and accordingly the same is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 7th September, 2009 CBS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3747 of 2009 (Dismissed) 7th September, 2009 CBS