gst 1 wp1505.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO. 1505 OF 2011. Shrikant Sadashiv Laulkar... .... .... .... ..Petitioner. V/s Balkrishna Digamber Laulkar... ... ... ..Respondent. Mr.Ajay A. Joshi, Adv. For the petitioner. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 17th March, 2011 PC: By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 3.1.2011 vide which the application for amendment of plaint came to be allowed. Admittedly the trial is yet to commence. Since the order impugned is interlocutory order I am not inclined to interfere with the same under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In the event the judgment and order is passed by the trial Court adverse to the interest of the petitioner and the petitioner is required to file an appeal he can very well challenge the said order in view of order 43 Rule 1(r) of CPC. 2. In so far as grievance of the petitioner regarding limitation is concerned the petitioner can very well raise the said ground in the additional written statement that he will be required to file or by carrying out consequential amendment to the written statement which issue learned trial Court would be required to consider on the basis of evidence that would be led before it. Writ Petition stands disposed of.