RIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS '" "^' WRIT PETITION (C)' No. 4273 of2009 Prafehat Kumar Mishra s/o Shri Satyaiiarayan Mishra, aged bout 25 years, student RJ'O Qtr. No. 243/2, Neai- Sub Station Shivajinagan Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Soutli Eastem Coalfields Limited, through: Ciiainiian-cum-Maiiagmg Directon Basant Vihar, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. The Collector, Dist.net Korba (C.G.) 3. The ChiefGeneral Maiiager, S.E.C.L District Korba 4. The Deputy Chief Persomiel Maiiagen S.E.C.L. District Korba (C.G.) W3UT PETITION 'UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SBiHoii'MeSlmSat.isIiK.AgsiiIiotri.J. Presant: Ashok K. Sluikla, Advocate for tlie petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govemment Advocate fbr the State, Shri H.BAgi'awal, Senior Advocate with Snit. Meera Jaiswal, Advocate fbrthe respondetits 1, 3 aiid 4. (Passed on 12 dayof August, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on mstmctions, submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merits at tliis stage« However the respondent-authorities may be directed to coasider and decide the pending represeiitation dated 10th Januai-y, 2009 (Aimexure P/8) as expeditiously as possible. ^ 1, Agrawal, leamed Semor counsel appearing ibr the respondents 1, 3 and 4 submits that the pendiiig representation as stated above, will be considered and decided by tlie respondent-authorities iii accordance with law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, prefbrably withm a period offbur weeks from the date ofrecsipt ofa copy ofthis order- 3. In view ofthe above submission, according to Shri Shukla, nothmg survives fbr adjudication. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Arnit