”\ f, y RH AT BILASPuR ‘%§i§§i§§$§w EmQg§ THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY ""’ WW""LIMITED, MANAGER, THROUGH POST BOX DIVISIONAL NO.- 51, MALVIYA NAGAR, DURG (C.G.) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH coun‘r or cHHATn M.A. (C) No, Haw APPELLANT Vrs. RESPONDENTS/CLAIMANTS :- L. w‘i". SHRI PURUSHOTTAM TIWARI S/o VISHWANATH TIWARI, AGE 50 YRS. RESIDENT OF QUATER No.- 22/A, STREET N0.- 7, SECTOR-1, THANA— BHILAI BHATTI, BHILAI NAGAR, DISTRICT — DURG (C.G.) RESPONDENTS/NON—APPLICANTS AMIT KUMAR DADSENA S/O KHEMLAL Q7“ DADSENA, RESIDENT OF ROAD NO.~ 11, ’ $ QUA. NO.~ 1/C, SECTOR-1, BHILAI NAGAR, DISTRICT - DURG (C.G.) 3 SMT. POONAM SINHA W/O SHRI E A MOHAN SINHA, AGE — UNKNOWN, RESIDENT OF BADHIA TOLA, DONGARGARH, DISTRICT RAJNANDGAON (C.G.) 44‘ SMT. PRAMILA BAI LELE W/O LATE $ NARAYAN RAM LELE, 50 YRS., RESIDENT OF 24/582, HANUMAN MANDIR ROAD, NEAR TO NATRAJ HOTEL, TATYAPARA, RAIPUR (C.G.) OMPRAKASH LELE S/O LATE NARAYAN RAM LELE, AGE 50 YRS., RESIDENT OF 24/582, ROAD OF HANUMAN MANDIR, NEAR TO NATRAJ HOTEL, TATYAPARA, RAIPUR (C.G.) APPEAL UNDER SECTIONkf'Tg OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1988 A 0 V" ‘§W s ' DW!5IQN BENCH: HON’aLE MR. LM.QUDDU$I & ’K HON’BLE MR. G. MiNHAJUDDiN, JJ. M.&. {c3 N0. 15GZ/2QG8 ; P QRQER mm” (26” My, 2am m LM. Qudmum J; 1. This appeal has been filed against the award of the 9t“ Motor Acmdent Claim3 Tribuna! (FTC), Durg, dated 2612008 paeaiaed in Claim Case No,150/O6, fasiening the IiabiMy t0 pay compensation on the appeHant/inaurance aompany jointly and geveralw atcng with driver and owner of the which. Brief facts of the came are that on 25.5.2005 Maya Tiwari, who waa workfng aa $30 in the Construction Department of Bhiiai Stooi Piant, waa roiuming after her dutiea at about 2.00 am by hor Soooiy bearing rogiairaiion No CG Q7 ZF 47$? to her reaidonoe. At that iimo, roapondont No.2 by driving the vehioia Hero Honda OD Dawn hoaring rogiatraiion No“ CG O8 E 7'651 (haioinaiier i'oforreoi to aa "tho offending vohioio”), whtoh waa ownaci by roapohdont No.3 and inattroo with tho appoiiant hotoih, haar S‘eototm8 Avohuonc in a raah amt negtigoht marmor daahoci Maya Ttwari, ao a roauit of which aha atiataihoci griavoua injtti'ioa $he waa admitted in 3ootorm‘8 Hoapitai, Ethtiai for troatmoht whore aha cttoti during tho oourao of treatmont. Roooohdoht Not/oiaimaht to tho hoahantct of tho cioooased. He ttioti a oiaim potition undor Section 166 of tho Motor Vohiotea Act, 1983 (to ahott “tho Act, 1%8") claiming o totot oompohoatioh of Mi: Sudhir Agrawai, counsel for the appellant. Mr. DN Prajapati, counsel for respondent No.1. Mr. Malay Ku. Bhaduri, counsel for respondents No.2 & 3. ,o .J Appetiant The Oriental insurance Company Limited, Durg (CG) V5 Rooponoionts/ Shri Purushottam Tiwari and others maimants Preoent: Rs3,30,65,8601a far the damh 0f hm wife Maya Tiwar§ under varia h@&d$. ‘ Hawevm, mamgd THbunm, after awe ecrutiny of the evidence, ora! and cjommgzntmy, km by tha wartigas, awarded a total compenaaticn a? RMLQT§00L~ by fmtening the !iability up0n the awmilarlt/mur'arm campamy iaintly and neveralw afong with driver and nwner m‘ thn offending vehicle. . Mnzard Warhead wanna! far the partieh, peruaed tha Ioww mun when?! (LCR) an wet! as; the impugned award. The cinimnnt in hugband of the deceaaed and he wan thn @mptnyw of the State Bank of India. Hte wah gntiing more aaiaty than hia with siemawdi The cinceaged had m9 nominatad htar mathnr hnd mmta amnunt wast rnceivead by hm mother tram Eihiiai EStaei Pihht a“ compenaatinn. Thnugh the Tribuhnt hat;» ethnitict thta diehaenctnncy ht thn parents upon the deceased, but the tetet dependeney hae been eaiei‘iieted of the httehai‘id/eiaimant, ignen‘ng the fact thet he wee getting mme eeiafy than the deeeaeeci Wife Therefete, the Trihttnai hae enmmitted a manifeet ermt 0f ism in hhittfng the tetei dependehey 0f the huebtfhd claimant eh hie hemmed Wife, in theee etrettmeteneeet, we are {if the hhihieh that the matter requiree reaeheidemtteh ”it the end hf the Tt'ihtihal. tn the remit, we eilnw thin: appeal in pert, eet nettle the impugnen award and remit the matter haek tn the Trihttnal to decide the enee afreeh nfthi’ giving npnerttinity df hearing to the partied, in the light 0f thd ohdervetiene made abet/e. i...erirned cettndet fer the dhpellhnt hm aired raided e edntentidn with r it tn nhdhge nf the dtiVdr of the offending vehiele‘ Therefore, the Trihtinail dhdhid find nut the that ed td tithether the driver wae Changed and wae having a valid and effective driving licenee 0r riot ht thn time hf aeeident. Tire mending applicatinn tile 170 0f the Act, 198$ of the dianeilhht/iheurdnee edmpany dhall elm he eeneidered. The dmnuht, if any, deheeited eheii remain in fixed depoeit in a netionhiimd hank fer d peried of ene year, which email be etihject t0 the demeidh td he taken diredh by the Tribunal, G1 w us; d“ t 0 Ngamims: Sta mammn that ma gartixaa $hm! £365: altawed t0 amend the ggddma fabmmr wimnce, me dacumama or get the dmmzmams3 varmad etcwand thereafter, {ma award war! be made gfmw. 10. Wartims ahau appwr baafore km} Tribuna% on 24”” Auguat, 2011. Hmwgévm", if amy (:xf my partiaa {emam abgent, notice aha?! b6: isweci t9 §t m pmvidx’e an awammity m put éia came afresh. H. LQR aha” ma mm hack m their Tribuna! Witheut further de!ay. gm CW m _‘ 4 ¥ a m. No amer a$ w Qmm 7 % awhfm mm! rulaa. @pw Sd/_ Sd/_ G. Minhajuddin I.M.Quddus: Judge Judge