IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31073 of 2009 SHOSHAN PANDIT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.09.2009 This case reflects the misuse of privilege of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that on few occasions the petitioner defaulted in appearance resulting in cancellation of his bail bonds. This Court finds from the impugned order that an observation has been made therein granting liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after examination of the witness Md. Ehtasauddin. It is contended that the petitioner misused the privilege of bail for a period of one month 22 days for which he is in custody since 22.05.2009. This Court while declining the prayer of the petitioner, disposes of this application in the following manner: “No sooner the witness Md. Ehtasauddin is examined in this case, the trial court shall release the petitioner abovenamed on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.N.Ram, Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Complaint Case No. 17c2/06 subject to the condition that one of the bailors shall be his own/close family member and that he shall 2 appear on each date fixed in the trial. In case of default in such appearance without there being any compelling reasons thereof, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bonds and secure his arrest in accordance with law.” hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )