^INGtrttti Ci^'{^^ rr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) .Cs? 2-,^ W.P.No.r.^.T.':../2006 •TT PBTITIONER uy ,°>-"QH ' . ^^"" 'o y ^^y^"' •r- ^' VERSUS Sita Ram Soni S/o Late Shri D.R.Soni Aged about 55 years R/o Mayapur, Ambikapur District- Surguja (C.G.) RESPONDENTS ,0< ^'yy y ^ ^'^^y^ f7~ c'f/\^ \^ --1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary Panchayat &, Rural Development Department, DKS Bhawan Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) //2. The Secretary Panchayat & Social Welfare Department, Governraent of Chhattisgarh, DKS, Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^S. Secretary General Administration Department, Government of Chhattisgarh DKS Bhawan RaipurfC.G.) A. Chief Executive Offlcer / Jila Panchayat Sarguja (C.G.) /: PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS TO MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- XI-HC-78 ?^TiaTflf^T;W^T 3TteTqirf?:iN iW3TI^Tsh*li<!h TSf'WvW, ^WiS, h^M^ _._ ^•^•^o.'.l1A?.^ks4 S3 2QQ ssg'arpiRra', dTn^i(i, Riciiuy l-0 .p-- MB.M^I ]'2^o4 w^i w* (yt^^) ^ 200 q^lfaift.T WRTt'if teA rfsRZK ^isrf^Tsn^T Shri Anand Pandey, coun^ei for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy ^3.A. for the State/respondents No.1 to 3, on advance CODV. Heard. By the instant petition; th^ petitioner has prayed for quashment of the impugned orders dated 24-1-2006 and 24-6-2CX)6 whereby he has been repatriated. It has also bs^n prayed fo quash the order dated 25-3- 2006 whereby the petitioner has tieen posted in Janpad Panchayat, Usoor as Panchayat and Social Educati^n Organizer. Learned counse! for the p^tftioner submitted that the petitioner was recruited on the post of Panchay^t and Social Education Organizer in the year 1980 and thereafter in the| year 1985 the petitioner was sent on deputation in the Panchayat and pural Deveiopment Department as Rural Deveiopment Officer. Thereaft^r, the petitioner was again sent on deputation on the postof C.E.O. iji the Panchayat and Rural Development Department. Now, by the impi|igned order the petitioner has been repatriated al! of a sudden and i!|i the meantime, the persons who were juniors to the petitioners have be^n promoted to various posts whereas, the petitioner has been ignored fn the promotion list as wei! as in the senioritv list. In the circumstanctes, iearned counse! submitted that the petitioner has already made a repl'esentation to respondent No.1 v/hich is not being decided, therefore, the [petitioner may be allowed to make a detailed representation to respon^ent No.1 and he be djrected to decide the same. to which counsel for res|?ondents No.1 to 3 has no obiection. P.T.O. XI-HC-78 sii^T^rf^iNi gsfT sn^r gnriq; c T ,"/ ^/ tfW^II SK*1T<*> 73t '<11<IIM<<, S'xflu'IS, RlMKiy ,.-:/:.-^^^200 W^W W* (licl'3's":<.er) gTgTWHfia'sn^r Having heard iearned co4 facts and circumstances of the on merits of the case, the petitioner appears to be just, fair | is aliowed to make a detailed his grievances, annexing a ccj, annexures within a period of ten| No.1 is directed to decide the sat date of its receipt, conssdering a!| an objective manner, in accorda^. With the aforesaid directloh Consequently, M.(W.)P.N4 Parties are entitled for cert pr^yer ^rafcriW ffrocff ff teIA ^sri^iTsn^T insel for the parties, having regard to the ;ase and witiiout expressing any opinion made by iearned counse! for the 'and reasonable. Therefore, the petitioner resentation to respondent No.1 raising a! py of the instant writ petition and its days from today and in turn, respondent Tie within a perjod of one month from the the grievances raised by the petitioner in ce with law. i, the writ petition stands disposed of. ^.3398/2006 also stands disposed of. :ified copy of this order. . L.C. Bhadoo Jiidge P.T.O.