1 MSS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2734 OF 2009 BHARTI VIDYAPEETH .. PETITIONER Vs. P. L. PATHADE & ORS. .. RESPONDENTS Mr. R. M. Kadam i/b S. R. Borulkar for petitioner Mr. Vimal Gupta for respondents CORAM:SMT.RANJANA DESAI & J. P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE: 16/3/2009 P.C. . Rule. Returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service. By consent of the parties taken up for hearing. 2. The grievance of the petitioners inter alia is that the Director General of Income-tax, Pune has reviewed its order dated 22/12/08 by order dated 20/2/09 without giving any reasons. We find substance in this submission. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that 2 so far as order dated 22/12/08 is concerned, the petitioners have partly complied with it. They have paid Rs.4 crores as of today and the balance amount of Rs.3 crores will be paid by 25/3/09. In view of this statement, in our opinion, following order will meet the ends of justice: . Order dated 20/2/09 passed by the Director General of Income-tax (Inv), Pune is quashed and set aside. The statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners that amount of Rs.3 crores will be deposited by 25/3/09 is accepted. The petitioners shall pay the amount of Rs.3 crores as per the statement made before us today and challan may be produced before the Assessing Officer. . CIT (Appeals) shall dispose of the pending appeals as expeditiously as possible. . Till appeals are finally disposed of and for a period of four weeks thereafter the demand shall stand stayed. . Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. JUDGE 3 JUDGE