t? <3~ ^.<^AC ^St^:> jo.y-1' ^- ^ !S-!^01' "'Q^ IN o3 I^jHte'H COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR {C..G. W. P. N0. S~]^~l 2006 Petition.er Mahesh Ram Bareth S/o Late Shri Kariya Ram Bareth, Aged abeut 32 years, R/o village - Adbhar, Tehsil - Malkharauda, Dist : Janjgir - Champa-fC.G.S Versus Respondents 1. /-• 2. 3. The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Education Department D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur- (C.G.) The Collector, Janjgir Ghampa, Dist: Janjgir Champa-(C.G.) The District Education Officer, Dist: Janjgir Champa-(C.G.) The Principle Govt. Higher Secondary School, Adbhar, Tehsil - Sakti, Dist : Janjgir Champa-fC.C-.j WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA + XI-HC-22 -T£T"i||<<ld'i(, EiiTllti'lii, 1««niyi< A. SD^T^iT R-fi* sn^w sh^iqi ^lficj •Vf. -:<:;. ^< hio' Gowri r sii^i TOnw(Tf?a 24-1-2008 Shri Bharat Rajput, counsel fq death of the employee occurred on not eartier. It is further submitted this Court on 20/12/2005: He pray^ this case also. Learned counsel for the Statt states that the State of Chhattisgar^ cases of dependants of those'emplf fd ^>i^I<i<i}TT ^HciT ^ f^<^ <^i^.i< ^T 3lpgq 3T[^[ the petitioner. Shri S.P. Kale, Govt. Advocat^for the State of Chhattisgarh. Heard. This case relates to compas^ionate appointment consequent upon the death of an employee serving in ^he State. Learned counsel for the p^titioner categorically stated that the 23-10-1999 i.e. after 1-11-1997 and hat in batch of cases bearihg W.P. No.1322/2002 :involving the same cjuestion, orders have been passed by that similar orders may be j^assed in does not dispute the above fact and has taken a decision to conskler the yees who died on or after 1/11/1997 strictly in accordance with the poli^y prevalent at that time. He hcwever the parties, wjthout expressing any the opinion of this Court, ends of given to th®State of Chhattisgai consider and decide the case of policy prevalent at the time of dea opinion on the merits of the case, in justice will be served if a direction is |h and the authorities concemed to (he petitioner in accordance with the th of the employee concerned. If the st petitioner found eligible; appointm^nt orders will be issued as eariy as possible preferablyon br before 3)' directed to render due co-operation [1'" May, 2006. The petitioner is also Ito the authorities. It is made clear that Copy to the Statecounset, w order to the respondents for complia^ce. issuing necessary orders may be submits that four months time given. ~ In view ofthe submissions n^ade by learned counsel appearing for if any grievance still remains, the p^titioner may avail the remedy ayailabte under the !aw including filing of the ilietition before this Court. With theaforesaid observatiotis, this petition stands disposedof. Certified copy as per rules. ho will be obliged to communicate the Sd'- Fakhruddin Judge [Tft^ ^R^