IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 5525 of 2011 Decided on: July 20, 2011 Vijay Chauhan Vs. State of H.P. and ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. G.S. Rathour, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. for the respondents No. 1 to 4. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner admittedly was a PTA teacher. By the time, he was adjudged as entitled for appointment, it appears that vacancy was filled-up by the fifth respondent, who is a contract teacher. According to the petitioner, the fifth respondent can work in any other suitable vacancy, whereas the petitioner can work only in Government Sr. Secondary School, Matal, being a PTA teacher. The petitioner may point out suitable vacancy where the fifth respondent is willing to work, before the first respondent, in which case the first respondent will take appropriate action to adjust the fifth respondent in that vacancy and in the resultant vacancy, the petitioner will be re-engaged as PTA teacher, till otherwise is replaced by a regular teacher. 2. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice July 20, 2011 ( Justice V.K. Sharma ) (pankaj) Judge