1 15.ao.110.09.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION skt APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 110 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 129 OF 2009 Mr.Sohrab Anklesaria ... Appellant Vs. Mr.Pesi S. Anklesaria ... Respondent ...... Mr.Sandeep Parikh a/w. Ms. Punita Soni i/by M/s. Bilawala & Co. for the appellant. Mr.Zubin Behramkamdin a/w. Mr.D.Marfatia i/by M/s. Bharucha & Partners for the respondent. ...... CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 30th AUGUST, 2010. P.C. 1 With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the impugned order stands modified and clarified as follows : “Opponent is hereby restrained form using the premises 94-A, M.G.Road, Pune, either personally or along with other partners, as office of Penosh Translinks and is further restrained from bringing or permitting employees, customers and agents of Paynosh Translinks in the said premises, till the decision of Arbitration Tribunal or till any further order passed by the said Tribunal.” 2 15.ao.110.09.sxw It is clarified that the appellant/respondent in Civil Misc. Application No.107 of 2008 before the District Court, Pune, shall not be restrained to enter the premises as Partner of Penosh Transports. 2 The Appeal as well as Civil Application No. 129 of 2009 stand disposed of accordingly. [ J.H. BHATIA, J.]