: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.915 OF 2009 M/s.Navrang Enterprises ... Appellant V/s. Sharad Gopal Deshmukh & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.A.Y. Sakhare i/b Jeetendra Sachdev for Appellant Mr.Miheer Jayakar with S.I. Jayakar for Respondent Nos.2 & 3 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: DECEMBER 14, 2009 P.C.: 1. The appellant is aggrieved by the order passed on 26.8.2009 by the trial Court refusing to grant any interim relief. The appellant entered into an agreement with respondent No.1 by which respondent No.1 agreed to assign, transfer the leasehold rights in a plot in favour of the appellant. The appellant claimed that it made various payments to respondent No.1 under this agreement. The appellant then contends that it entered into various agreements with respondent No.2 for the purchase of land. According to the appellant, it has received a certain amount from respondent No.2 under a Memorandum of Understanding. The appellant contends that under this Memorandum of Understanding, respondent No.1 was to pay the appellant a certain sum of money besides reimbursing the amount already paid by it to respondent No.1. According to the appellant, it has received only Rs.20 lakhs as against Rs. : 2 : 61,12,5000/- which is payable to it by respondent No.2. It is in these circumstances that the appellant contends that the trial Court has erred in rejecting its application for interim relief. The interim relief sought by the appellant was for an injunction restraining the respondent No.2 from creating third party rights in respect of the suit property. 2. In my opinion, the trial Court has has rightly refused the interim relief. The appellant has merely a monetary claim against respondent No.2 although the suit filed is one of specific performance. 3. Appeal is dismissed. 4. On the application made by Mr.Sakhare, the order granting status quo shall continue for a period of four weeks from today.