IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH AUGUST 2010 / 13TH SRAVANA 1932 LA.App..No. 865 of 2010() ------------------------- LAR.49/2006 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ATTINGAL .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT & R1 IN LAR ------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LATHA T.THANKAPPAN RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS & RS IN LAR ------------------------------------ 1. K.K.JOSE, S/O.GAOURI, VILAKKATHU VEEDU, OOMANPALLIKAQRA, PAZHAYAKUNNUMMEL, REP,.BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SANU,S.KARTHIKA, MUKKUROAD, PAZHAYAKUNNUMMEL-695 601. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KSRTP/PULAMON, KOTTARAKKARA-691 506. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ L.A.A.No. 865 OF 2010 ------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of August, 2010 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Even though several attractive grounds have been raised and Smt.Latha T.Thankapan, learned senior Government Pleader addressed persuasive arguments based on those grounds, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal. We notice our own judgment in L.A.A. No.851/2010 which was in respect of acquisition of land in the same village pursuant to same notification for the same purpose. The only difference is that it was a different rate that was awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer for the properties involved in this case. Ultimately by the judgment in L.A.A. No.851/2010 we have approved the rate of enhancement at more or less the same rate as granted under the impugned judgment. The appeal will stand dismissed in limine. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM , JUDGE dpk