. eq;4q frt4:fit’ t ‘. iw ma aioa WISH? 0, KAillAiflA AT BANUILO ,*nDmIamalamI*YOPJUfllQQB BEIORZ TEE EOVBLZ KR. JUsTICE TIM?!! S. TRAKUR •. WRIT paTITION NO. 1170011992 BETWEKft- ari.Anand Balachendra Kari, proprietor, Prime Marketing Corporation, Bangalore. PRTITIOflR (by Sri R.s.N.Murthy, Advocate) tEDs— 1. The Cesaissioner of Coesercial Ta zes, Vanijya Therige Keryalaya, Banglore-9. 2. The Assistant Coemercial-Tax Officer, I Ada. Circle, Bangalore. .. RWOD2NTS (by $ri LM.Shivayogi Sway, EC(P) This Writ Petition filed u/a 226 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the endorsement vide Annezure ‘A’ dated 6—2—1992 and etc. ThiE Writ Petition coming on for hearing, this y, the Court mnde the followings S —9— ORDER In this petition for a certhrari, the petitioner calls in question the validity of en dorsement dated 6,2,92 whereby it wa called upon to produce ts regular bookc of account along with purchase bills in ret pect of Netlon purchaces made by him to verify the nature and description of the transactions, 2, No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, today, 3, Mr,Shivayogi wamy, lemed Govt Pleader for the respondents submits that the endorsement tn 4 uestin was followed by another erdorcement dated 20,4,92 whereby the petitioner wa ased to collect the rejuisite number of ‘C’ fomc after producirg the puroh°sa bills, He further submits that in the Ii ht of the cuoseuent endorcement, nothing further sunives for consideration in thic petition and that the patitioner i5 at liberty to approach te uthoritis for the issue of fQ$ tome in which event, hi reuest shall be consid4red in ‘‘‘3 a —3- accordance with law, 4, Recording the suomission mde at the bar, this writ petition is disposed of resening liberty for the petitioner to approach the autho rities conceited for the issue of t Qt fo in 4ccordance with the ubequent endorsement re ferred to above, ?o costs, I JUDGE sa c/hba/—