IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.l004 of 2005 with C A Somnath V Unde ..Petitioner vs The Executive Engineer Nasik Irri. Dept Nasik .. Respondent Mr.S.V.Marne for petitioner CORAM: A.P.SHAH J. CORAM: A.P.SHAH J. CORAM: A.P.SHAH J. Dated 10.6.2005 Dated 10.6.2005 Dated 10.6.2005 P.C: . The short question which was raised before the labour court was whether the workman has worked for 240 days during relevant period. The workman in his evidence has categorically admitted that he had work for 49 dated in l987, l48 days in l988 and 46 days in l989. In view of this clear admission the labour court has rightly held that the termination of the services of the petitioner was justified. In the circumstances no interference is called for in exercise of jurisdiction under Arts 226 and 227 of the Constitution. Petition is dismissed.