IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 1ST AUGUST 2011 / 10TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20858 of 2011(F) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ V.K.VIJAYAKUMARI, HOUSE KEEPER, COLLEGE OF NURSING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN-695 001 2. DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, MEDICAL COLLEGE.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN-695 011 3. THE PRINCIPAL, COLLEGE OF NURSING, MEDICAL COLLEGE.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN-695 011 R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.V.VIJULAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.20858/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 25/8/2008 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P2 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18/3/2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.20858/2011-F ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 1st day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner seeks for a direction to the second respondent to consider the grievance raised in Ext.P2 representation and take a decision within a time frame. 2. The petitioner is working as House Keeper under the third respondent College of Nursing. She was appointed through the Public Service Commission. She is stated to be working from 2004 onwards and her probation has been declared as per Ext.P1 dated 25/08/2008. It is pointed out that the petitioner had applied for leave from 15/06/2007 to 15/10/2007 on medical grounds but the same has not been granted or rejected by the third respondent. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that even though so many representations were filed, the same did not yield any result and hence the petitioner has again approached the second respondent by filing Ext.P2 representation. W.P.(C). No.20858/2011 -:2:- 4. I am not pronouncing anything on the merits of the claim. It is upto the second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P2. There will be a direction to the second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 representation if the same has not been disposed of so far and communicate the decision to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. The petitioner will forward a copy of the writ petition along with a certified copy of the Judgment to the second respondent for compliance. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms