C/)@ (KQ/\ GD IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION S NO. egg; OF 2011 /» Salik Ram Baghel S/o. Shri Bhagat Ram, aged about 41 years, Post of Head Master, Working as Govt. Primary Schoo! Bhandarkhol,» Block Pali, Distt. Korba (CG) PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS ,1. State Through of Chhattisgarh, /, Secreta ry, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Korba, Distt. Korba (CG) Joint Director, Treasury, accounts, pension, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) Block Education Officer Pali, . ” z ”WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Distt. Korba (CG) 3a WM, ¥§éhvr§ 1W c Counsel for the State su mits that case of the petitioner would also be considered on e same lines. ummm NPQ>NHL§§ \&FL 200 WWW ammm m m (aafww) _.-.__ ’ mm ma Mam r Wifm’m as Tmsh’ aifmm Fgtir fm I 3.8.: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER 03.08.2011 Shri Amit Kumar coun lfor the petitionerv Shn' N.Naha Roy: P.L. fo the Stats. Counsel for the pctih'on r submits that the petitioner is entitled to beneiit of two adva ce increments on account of he having passed B.T.I. examina 'on in the year 1993 before his appoinugent at his own cost It is submitted that the issue involved in the present petitio is no longer res integra and the same has been dually decided y the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ashe Saxena V . State of M.P. Es Ors. 2009 (III)MPJR (SC) 59. It is fulther submitted at this Court has also taken a similar View in its order date 6.2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008. Counsel for the etitioners further submits that the order dated 29.4.2010 passed in Writ Appeal NO. 124/ 2009, wherein relying u n the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case ofAsha Sax na (supra) and the order passed by this Court in another Wri Appeal No. 87f2009, directions have been issued for conside tion of the case for grant of two L advance increments as per c' oular dated 21.9.1974 issued by é the State of Madhya Prades , after verihcation of the facts pleaded in the pen'tion. Xl-HC—78 3a WW, am, W3? HWWW'" 200 m 1m? (1am?!) 1 aévaw&%$ xwnnaQaa§m ammm In View of above, the pt dimction to the mspondent aut‘ the petitioner for grant of twc circular dated 21.9.1974 issu‘ Pradesh after ve%cation of the Within a period of four months § It is 131ade clear that this opinion on merits of the case would be at liberty to dccide tt with law. Win.“ WK Wt? 13' Fwfr 1W 3? am anéw :tition is disposed of with a loritias to decide the claim of advance increments as per 3d by the State: of Madhya facts pleaded in the petition om today. Court has not expressed any and the authority concerned te same strictly in accordance Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge