1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5211 OF 2010 The Pushpadanteshwar Sahkari Sakhar Kharkhana Ltd. and others .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Shrikant Patil, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri S. K. Kadam, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State. Shri R. N. Dhorde, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5. CORAM : P. V. HARDAS AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 17TH JUNE, 2010. PER COURT : . This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners assailing the action of the respondent bank initiated under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002. Petitioners have challenged the action of the respondent bank on several grounds. In the light of judgment of the Division Bench 2 of this Court in ATV Projects India Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and others reported in 2008(1) All Mr (N.O.C.) 41, petitioners have alternate remedy available in law. This writ petition therefore is sans merits and is accordingly dismissed. The petitioners if advised may avail the remedy available in law. Since we have not adjudicated any of the issue raised in this petition, all issues are kept open. The petition is summarily dismissed with no order as to costs. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ P. V. HARDAS, J.] bsb/June 10