1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 16 OF 2008 ( New Education Society & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. AUGUST 22, 2008. Heard Shri Deshpande, Advocate for the applicant – original defendants No. 1 & 2 and Shri Lambat, Advocate for respondent No.1 – original plaintiff. I have perused the plaint with the assistance of both the advocates. The memo of revision though mentions that the plaint is at Annexure – I, document at Annexure – I is application for temporary injunction under Order 39, Rules 1 & 2 read with section 151 of Civil Procedure Code. Shri Deshpande, Advocate has handed over Regular Civil Suit No. 250 of 2007 for perusal of this Court. The plaint shows that the dispute filed by Union of India is essentially seeking relief against the private parties and not against defendant No.3 – State of Maharashtra. In fact defendant No.3 has not opposed the reliefs as 2 claimed in the plaint at all. In this background, I have also perused the impugned order passed by the Court below rejecting the preliminary objection raised by the present revision applicants. I find that looking to the nature of controversy, the said Court has correctly found that Article 131 of Constitution of India has no application. No case of jurisdictional error is, therefore, made out. No interference is warranted in the matter. Revision Application is dismissed. No orders as to costs. JUDGE *GS.