IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41272 of 2009 GANESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Versus THE UNION OF INDIA THRU.CBI with Cr.Misc. No.41808 of 2009 MD.SHAMSHER ALAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU C.B.I. with Cr.Misc. No.2028 of 2010 KANCHAN KUMAR VERMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU.C.B.I. ----------- 2 17.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and C.B.I. Receipt of excess money is said ignorance of having no accurate payment status by the Billing Clerk, all these three beneficiaries after deduction of the same adjusted the amount from their salary and are apprehending their arrest which in my view, also is not justified. Learned counsel for the C.B.I. submits that there is no receipt of payment of excess money. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, C.B.I., South Bihar, Patna in Special Case no. 15/2008 arising out of R.C.No. 20(A)/2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)