@ f9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G) wmz. ;y” w.p. s No. é 6 2011 Govind Prasad Soni, aged about 50 years, S/o Shri Ishwar Prasad Soni, Head Master, Government Girls Primary School Boida, Block Pali, Distt. Korba (C.G.) PETITIONER w : “ VERsus x (MN , :1. state of Ch'hattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department Korba (C.G.) District Education Officer, Korba (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block Pali, Distt.Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA 1' x“ ”a V V ResPONDENTs ‘13 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.646 OF 2011 (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri K.S. Pawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State. Gowri ORDER (ORAL1 (Passed on this 3 day of February, 201 1) Heard Iearned counsel for the parties. By this petition: the ’petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and provide benefit of FR 22 (D) of the Chhattisgarh Fundamental Rules for grant of increments, as provided under the rules and also to pay arrears from the date when it became due. At the very outset, learned “counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the identical matter has already been considered and decided by this CoUrt vide order dated 27-3-2008 in W.P. (S) No.4991 of 2006 and the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the said decision. Learned counsel appearing for the State does not dispute that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P. (S) No.4991 of 2006. Learned counsel further subl‘nits that if the petitioner files fresh representation before the concerned authorities for the reliefs. which he has claimed by way of this petition, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, subject to verification of facts. For the foregoing reasons, the instant petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation before the respondent authorities raising all of his grievances raised in this petition and on such representation being made, the respondent authorities shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. ”WWW“ W Sd/- ' Satish K. Agnihotrl Judge ‘I"/ PETITIONER Govind Prasad Soni Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others