:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9324 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 9324 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 9324 OF 2005 Shri Tejraj Juharmal Oswal (Gandhi) ..Petitioner versus Shri Kalika Devi Somawanshi Kshatriya Kasar Samaj, through its Trustees ..Respondents Shri A. M. Kulkarni i/b. Shri A. P. Kulkarni for the Petitioner. CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY,2006 DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY,2006 DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY,2006 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : . By the impugned order the Trial Court has allowed an application for amending the plaint. Primafacie the learned Trial Judge is correct in holding that the effect of the amendment would not be to disturb any admission made and that the amendment would not alter the nature of the suit. In the circumstances, no interference is called for, at this stage, particularly, since the trial is still to take place. However, while dismissing the Petition, it is clarified that it would be open to the Petitioner to challenge the final Judgment and Decree on all grounds should it become necessary for the Petitioner to do so. With the aforesaid clarification, the petition is dismissed. :2: (DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)