1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2045 OF 2003. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2045 OF 2003. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2045 OF 2003. IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.11509 OF 2002. FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.11509 OF 2002. FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.11509 OF 2002. Union of India : Appellants. versus M/s.Mehul Shashikanth & Co. & ors. : Respondents. Mr.Anand Samant for the appellants. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. DATED : 26th August 2005. DATED : 26th August 2005. DATED : 26th August 2005. ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER 1. Heard Mr.Samant, the counsel for the Appellants. Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 served. According to Mr.Samant Respondent No.3 is a commission agent and a formal party. The respondents are served. Advocate Mr.Mohan Roa undertakes to file vakalatnama on behalf of the 2 2 2 respondent Nos.1 and 2. This civil application is for condonation of delay of 5 days in filing the appeal. The delay has been satisfactorily explained. Hence the application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Put up the appeal for admission on 05.10.2005. [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J]