THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.9915 of 2010 Dated:28.04.2010 Between: Udugula Rama, And another. …Petitioners And The District Registrar, Warangal District, Subedari, Hanamkonda, Warangal District, And another. ...Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.9915 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioners have allegedly purchased an extent of Acs.12.07 guntas in survey Nos.219/4, 218/4 and 221/4 situated at Ramachandrapuram Village, Mulug Mandal in Warangal District, for a valuable consideration of Rs.2,43,500/- from its lawful owner and possessor Sri Gulam Mohammad Omer Khan on 03.04.2010. As their vendor was very old, he executed a Special Power of Attorney in favour of one Ananthula Srinivas for presenting the sale deed for registration before the second respondent. When the same was presented before the second respondent, it was refused to be received for registration, aggrieved by which, the present writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the second respondent to receive the documents and register the same. The Counsel for the petitioners and the Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue made the submissions. When a document is presented, it is incumbent on the part of the Registering Officer to examine the same with reference to Sections 31 to 36 of the Registration Act, 1908 (the Act) and/or Rules 26 and 58 of the Andhra Pradesh Rules under the Act. This aspect of the matter was considered by my learned brother Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy in W.P.No.15199 of 2004, dated 01.09.2004. Following the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the second respondent or any other Registering Officer to consider the documents presented by the petitioners for registration. Be it noted, if for any reason, the documents presented are not registered, it is incumbent on the part of the Registering Officer to record and furnish reasons under Section 71 of the Act. Even thereafter, if the petitioners have any grievance, they may file appeal before the appellate authority under Section 72 of the Act. Thereafter, if any adverse order is passed by the appellate authority, the petitioners can file a suit under Section 77 of the Act. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 28.04.2010 Note: Issue C.C by 03.05.2010. B/o. vs