"":;/ ^—^ ^•7 ^ AMENDED WRIT PETITION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR rCHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION N0. 2663^F^006 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Smt. J. Lall, wife of shri S.B. Lall, aged about 70 years, R/o "Shraddha" Opposite Shri Hanuman Ji Mandir Near Magarpara Chowk Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Municipal Corporation Bilaspur Through: Its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Collertor Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION ETC. XI-HC-22 3^'^qpTRpr, OTfltl'ls, ficliuy OT^(^^^ ^ 1^ IIICTI sniitf) ••••••-••••••••••••• g^ i 200 R<i«d' •an^T^r R-fi+sn^T StlliqiHf^T Stlllt) 22-12-2006 Shri Manindra Shrivas(ava, Sr. Advocate with Shri Bhaskar Payasi counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.S. KachhawahaJ respondentNo.1. Shri N.K. Agrawal, Dy. Panel Lawyerforthe State/resbondent Heard. During the course of a|i submits that in view of the to challenge the same befor^ validity, which requires filind withdrawal of the writ petitior) any coercive steps for demolj petition for a period of 15| appearing for respondents prayer. In view of the aforesaid withdrawn with a direction to is in question in this petition| (fifteen) days from today available under the law Thereafter, i.e. after 15 (fifteeti accordance with law towardsl and demolition of aforesaid bi<i Consequently, I.A.Nos.t Certified copy as per ri^l' arkd befbre <=ft]<ifci<h-i *<wiaTfffei^t'<.Rt+<ii<. ^sri^irsn^r counsel for Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur/ Advocate General with Ku. Deepali Pandey, :No.2. ajrguments, learned counsel for the petitioner detnarcation report, it is inevitable for petitioner competent Court of civil jurisdiction to its of civil suit and, therefore, he prays for with a direction to respondents not to take jshing her building that is in question in this (fifteen) days, to which learned counsel fifankly conceded and did not object to his situation, the writ petition is disposed of as (espondents not to demolish the building that and not to dispossess the petitioner for 15 if advised petitioner may seek remedy a competent Court of civil jurisdiction. eeji) days respondents are free to take steps in widening of road, construction of drainage ilding. .|11450/06 & 11451/06 stand disposed of. t'es- Sd/- ^ V.K.Shrivastava Judge