IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14169 of 2010 1. SMT. LEENA KUMARI D/O LATE HARISH CHANDRA SHRIVASTAVA R/O CIVIL LINE BUXAR, P.S.- BUXAR TOWN, DISTT.- BUXAR, PRESENTLY POSTED AS CLERK IN THE OFFICE OF DEPUTY INSPECTRESS OF SCHOOL, BUXAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCTION, PATNA DIVISION, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, BUXAR 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, NALANDA 6. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL EDUCATION OFFICER, HILSA, NALANDA 7. THE DEPUTY INSPECTRESS OF SCHOOL, BUXAR ----------- 02. 20.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that once warrant of arrest had been issued against the judgment debtor, there was no justification for recalling the same and that too on an application simplicitor without an opportunity to the petitioner to seek dismissal of the same. An application was filed on behalf of the State judgment debtor that the execution of the decree had been complied with and therefore the warrant may be stayed. Even, if the petitioner be technically correct that the warrant came to be stayed on the same date without any opportunity to him, nonetheless he is 2 required to demonstrate before the Court in the present proceeding, of the nature of prejudice caused to him by the order. The writ application contains no pleading whatsoever as to why the warrant should not have been stayed and in what manner and representation made by the judgment debtor was incorrect. The court finds no reason to interfere. The application stands dismissed. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)