CRM No. M 1842 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 1842 of 2010 Date of decision: 21.01.2010 Sandeep Kumar ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. R K Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was a Mistry and was not aware of the challan being presented in the Court. He joined the job as Mistry in Dubai and, thereafter, he remained there and now he has come back to India. On reaching India, he came to know that he has been declared as Proclaimed Offender. It is also submitted that meanwhile the co-accused of the petitioner faced the trial and the complainant party due to compromise has not supported the prosecution version and they stand acquitted by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jalandhar vide order dated 10.11.2001 (Annexure P1). CRM No. M 1842 of 2010 2 In view of the above facts, in case, the petitioner appears before the trial Court within one week from today and applies for regular bail, the same shall be considered and decided sympathetically within one week. The petitioner shall not be arrested for the next one week in order to enable him to appear and move an application for regular bail before the trial court. Disposed of accordingly. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge January 21, 2010 mohan