»FC1 n NIHOT Vo Shri Adhari Lal Shrivastava Age about 50 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary Scfaool, Keshala, lock-Khairagarh, Dist. - RajnandgaoD (C.G.) isgarl Through: Secretary, School Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavvan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Present: •5-- Mr, Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Miss Deepali Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State,' 1 and 2. (Passed on 2nfl ofApril, 2007 Learned counsel appeari the State/respondents question of law involved same to that of in Y; for the p< iv subm sr as well as for .t the fact and 96}. wfaict of vide on L.2006. Leamed counsel appearing for leats does not controvert the said submission. 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of •) decided by this Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examinatioa, it was clarified that the nomenclatiire ofthe Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed a.s Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Vernm vs, The State Govt. of fther) (Supra). Ajnit •a-- Accordmgly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case ofYas l./^ v—"£--—/ verificatioa of the fact as to whether acquired D.Ed. Examination Certificate ises as per the circulars dated 24.12. 01.03.1999 aiid further whether he has beeii tmoner ns his own expen ,1^. 998 and advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- ,..::- Satish K.Agnihotri . Judge ; ,, TSWSSSsaSSsSi^^'tS^S^KSSiSSS^iSS^^^^^^^^^^^^i^^^^i^^^^^^S