IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Modification Application No.295 of 2010 In Writ Petition No. 396 of 2010 (M/S) Bal Kishan and others. ……Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …….Respondents. Mr. Gopal Narain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. C.S.C. for the State-respondents. Dated: -04-05-2010 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. This modification application No.295 of 2010 has been filed by the State to modify the order passed by this Court on 25-03- 2010 wherein a direction was given to the respondent No.6 i.e. Secretary Regional Transport Authority, Dehradun to take decision on the applications moved by the petitioners in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in case the applications are still pending for disposal. Learned Addl. C.S.C. has informed to the Court that the applications were pending before the respondent No.4 i.e. State Transport Authority Uttarakhand, Dehradun for decision. The fact has been wrongly mentioned in the order that the applications are pending before the respondent No.6 i.e. Secretary Regional Transport Authority, Dehradun. Since, the applications of the petitioners for renewal of permit are pending before the respondent No.4, i.e. State Transport Authority Uttarakhand, Dehradun, the order dated 25-03-2010 passed by this Court is liable to be recalled and the same is hereby recalled. 2 The respondent No.4 i.e. State Transport Authority Uttarakhand, Dehradun is directed to take decisions on the applications moved by the petitioners, annexed as annexure No. 2 to the writ petition in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. The modification application stands disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma, J.) 04-05-2010 MK