IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1142 of 2011 JAGDEO YADAV & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 07.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the labourers are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 144, 452, 380, 427/34 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioners that the local Mukhiya without giving information to the informant and other accused entered the house of the informant and damaged the front portion of the house by J. C. B. machine and snatched ornaments of the informant which has been found false against Mukhiya and contractor during investigation as it gets reflected from the impugned order. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are labourers and damaged, if any, portion of the house of the informant has been done, it has been done by J. C. B. Machine for which the contractor, Mukhiya and other persons are responsible. Considering the fact that the 2 petitioners are labourers and they worked on the direction of the contractor and nature of accusation, let the petitioners, Jagdeo Yadav, Subodh Yadav, Ram Bali Yadav, Kailash Yadav, Mithilesh Yadav, Vinod Yadav, Sadan Yadav, Ramswaroop Yadav @ Ram Saroop Yadav, Aazad Yadav and Kisan Yadav @ Kishan Yadav be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Mufassil (Nawada) P.S. Case No. 23 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Nawadah, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)