vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.42 OF 2006 REVIEW PETITION NO.42 OF 2006 REVIEW PETITION NO.42 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5875 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.5875 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.5875 OF 2005 Dhanjisha Pervez Disawala ... Petitioner V/s. Miss Piloo D. Broacha & Ors. ... Respondents Ms.D.R. Trivedi for Petitioner Mr.B.Mehta for Respondent Nos.1 to 5 Mr.V.T. Walawalkar with L.J. Kadri for Respondent NO.6 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. J. J. DATED: MARCH 10, 2006 MARCH 10, 2006 MARCH 10, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This Review Petition filed by the Petitioner is not maintainable as no case for review has been made out. The only ground urged by the learned Advocate for the Petitioner is that certain judgments which were pointed out to the trial Court and have been erroneously intrepreted by the trial Court. These judgments have not been pointed out to this Court according to the learned advocate and therefore, the Review Petition is maintainable. 2. In my view, no case for review has been made out. Petition Rejected.