IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2009 / 17TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 19058 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SUJITH V, KOCHUTHARAPUTHEN VEEDU, INJAKKAD KARA, KAKKAKUNNU P.O., KOLLAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.E.S.ASHRAF RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCITIES, KOLLAM. 2. THE SASTHAMCOTTA PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD., NO. Q 373, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, BHARANIKAVU, SASTHAMCOTTA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSHKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.19058 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 8th day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that, 2nd respondent had notified the vacancies of Attender and Peon by a notification issued on 30th January, 2006. However, pursuant to the judgment of this court in WP(c).No.5156/08 the first respondent directed the Bank to issue fresh notification and accordingly fresh notifications were issued on 25.8.2006. Again complaints were raised and the first respondent directed that further action be kept in abeyance. It would appear that in the meanwhile Society had initiated steps for conducting written test and aggrieved by the directions of the Joint Registrar to keep in abeyance further proceedings, society moved the Government and the Government passed Ext.P2 order permitting the society to proceed with the recruitment process. WP(c).No.19058/09 /2/ 2. The complaint in the writ petition is that though by Ext.P2 order dated 3.10.2007, the Government permitted the Society to proceed with the recruitment, there has not been any progress since then. Petitioner submits that complaining of this he had filed Ext.P3 to the 2nd respondent with a copy to the first respondent. According to him, Ext.P3 also remains unattended and it is in these circumstances the writ petition is filed. 3. In this writ petition, although several contentions are raised, all that the petitioner seeks is a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P3. Having regard to the above, I direct that if Ext.P3 has been received and is pending, the first respondent shall take note of the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, on the production of a copy of the judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the first respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) vi/ JUDGE WP(c).No.19058/09 /2/ WP(c).No.19058/09 /2/