IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3310 of 2010 MOHAMAD UMAR S/O MAKSUD AHMAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 5.4.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363, 365, 366 and 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner and others is that they forcibly kidnapped the daughter of the informant. However, during investigation it transpired that the son of the present petitioner was having love affairs with the victim girl in question and had even married her legally, but since the marriage is inter-caste it was not liked by the parties and, therefore, the bitterness had continued. The victim girl even filed a writ application before this Court for quashing the first information report and also for a direction for protection in which a direction has been given to record her statement u/s.164 Cr.P.C. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 10.12.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gopalganj in Gopalganj P.S.case No.290 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner - 2 - is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail and (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )