/ ^l05 ^i^r^FTl^NT ^^ ^^w^^ ^ -3^' ^TRI^PT, ^tll^Ko, t^TOy *ITH^r?^rHl^i "^200 3^?r '!T?W (T|?f^^^) l^T 3T irfN ^n^r j ^rof^ft^ 1ETR^?f ^f'fe^> ^N^H 1 ^ arrRm ^T^T W.P. [s] Sinale Bench; Hon'ble Mi^. Justice Dhirendra Mishra No.4/2009 PETETEONER (Petition U/A 226 of Constitution of India) Vishnu F|rasad Verma, Aged about 52 year, U.b.T./ S/o La1 Fighter | Raipur. •e Shri Lal Sai Verma, Govt. Freedom ,Hr. Sec. Scho. Rawan, Block Simga Distt. Vs RESPONDENTS 3-t 1. Stalfe Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secrjetary, Education bepartment, b.K.S. Bhaij/an, Distt. Raipur (C.6.). 2. The Raip 3. Bloc (C.6; Distt Education Officer, Raipur, Distt. |ir (c.e.) |< Education Officer, Simga, Distt. Raipur I) Present: Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate fq 4. Prin|:ipal, Govt. Freedom Fighter Hr. Sec. Sch. Rawiin, Block-Simga, Distt. Raipur. 5. Joinp- Director, Treasury Account & Pension, RaipjLir, bistt. Raipur (CG) Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel La^yer for the State. 06.1.2009 Heard. By the present petition th r the petitioner. ^ petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to pjay the petitioner annual increments and seniority from the date of |is initial appointment in the light of decision rendered by the M.P. S^-ate Administrative Tribunal in O.A. .-,.-.,.^^.,. .y^' f&NfiS. "^•^S-HC—78 ^' ^H^T ^T '{^NT ^STT ^T^? ^TfGF '3"rc? '%{t^i<n4, ^t^FT^/'N^rray *?1<^IT%<IT^ ^^200 ^TT^T T?^T (^t^^T) ^TOR^cran^i -l^ No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu ahd 56 others Vs. State of M.P. and others) dated 24.8.1992 and No.6681/06. Case of the petitioner is also by this Court in W.P. (s) |fhat he was appointed as Assistant ^Fprf^fhr TTR^f "^* fe^ ^^^R ^ ^tRR^It Teacher on the fixed pay scal^ of Rs.lOOA. After completion of probation period he was regulari^ed, however, regular pay scale from the date of his initial appointme|it has not been given to him. Other similarly situated teachers aggrjeved by the aforesaid action of the respondents, moved the State /^dministrative Tribunal, Jabalpur for grant of regular pay-scale frc^ the date of initial appointment wherein learned Tribunal vide ^rder dated 24.8.1992 allowed the same. This Court also while corjsidering the same issue in W.P. (s) No.6681/06 vide order dated J7.12.2006 directed the respondent authorities to consider the cas^ of the petitioners of that petition. The petitioner herein also appr^ached the respondent authorities to accord same treatment as he respondents have not paid any h< for giving similar treatment to is also similarly situated but the -ed. Learned counsel for the p^titioner submits that the petitioner may be allowed to make Q repre^jentation before the respondent No.l the petitioner and same pay-scale, which has atready been sanc|"ioned to other simijarly situated ^ ' .^XI-HG--78 "•-'^-.-''' 3?i^T'sfn'Rnw ^^n ^^w^ ^ ^> ~3^ "=qi<4S<r!<{, ^ft!?FR', f^TCiy W*RW W^T^t "^200^ 3^T^E^(^t3^^) ^fm^^ra^T '3> ^Prf^Rt^ "W^ff ^* fe^t TN^K ^^fftR^T^f teachers on account of the oMer of the State Administrative Tribunal and this Court. Learned for the State h disposed with a direction to the petitioner. In view of the above subj parties; this petition is disposedj as no objection if the petition is ^espbndents to consider case of the hiissions of learned counsel for the |of with liberty to the petitioner to make detailed representation alcjng with certified copy of this order to respondent No.l raising all hi^ grievances, raised in this petition, and on such representation bei(ig made, the respondent No.l shall decide the same within a periojj of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, after considering all the points raised by the petitioner and taking int^ account the orders passed by the Administrative Tribunal and this Certified copy as per rule^. Court. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge