1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Contempt Petition No. 240 of 2007 [N.E. Dod Vs. Asstt. Registrar, Co-op. Societies & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Ms. Pallavi Mahashabde, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. A. Taiwade, AGP for respondent nos. 1 to 3. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 28th April,2008. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner urges that the order of status quo granted by the High Court in a petition filed by the respondent nos. 9 and 10 herein is liable to be construed as mandatory order in favour of the petitioner. 3. According to the petitioner, the order of injunction granted by the Trial Court below Exh.5 in the suit filed by the respondentno.9 would thereby amount to disobedience of High Court's direction contained in the order passed in Writ Petition No. 160 of 2007. 4. It would be hard to conceive that an order of stauts quo in favour of respondent no.9 would be liable to be used as an order 2 favourable to the petitioner to urge that the said order is disobeyed and hence a contempt. 5. The petitioner is not in a position to demonstrate that this Court has recorded a finding or gave a dictum expressly so directing that petitioner's possession be protected and that such mandatory order has been disobeyed. No other prohibitory order is also shown which is violated. 6. In the circumstances, the Contempt Petition does not deserve any cognizance. It is, therefore, dismissed. Judge |Hedau|