Civil Revision No.4629 of 2008 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4629 of 2008 Date of decision: 2.2.2009 Dera Nandiana, Faridkot ...Petitioner Versus Punjab State and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. J.S.Brar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. H.S.Gill, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Ashok Singla, Advocate for the respondent No.2. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. Though there can not be any factual dispute that evidence of the plaintiff-petitioner came to be closed on 5.2.2008 (after it had availed of several opportunities therefor) and the rebuttal evidence was also closed by the order of the Court on 3.7.2008, it also cannot be lost sight of that the additional evidence proposed to be adduced (copy of the jamabandi and also copy of the Naqsha Haqdarwar pertaining to the suit land) are self proved documents which would not require any formal proof. The reception of those documents in evidence shall enable the Court to dispose of the controversy completely and effectually. It is common ground otherwise that both these documents are a part of the file from the time the suit was instituted. Civil Revision No.4629 of 2008 -2- **** In the totality of the circumstances, the petition shall stand allowed. The impugned order passed by the trial Court declining additional evidence plea on behalf of the plaintiff shall stand set aside. The plaintiff shall be entitled to adduce addition evidence (copy of the jamabandi and also copy of the Naqsha Haqdarwar pertaining to the suit land) subject to payment of Rs.5000/- as costs. Learned counsel for the petitioner assures that documents aforementioned would be just tendered into evidence on the next date of hearing and no adjournment at all would be sought in this context. February, 02, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge