IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 23RD JANUARY 2009 / 3RD MAGHA 1930 RP.No. 964 of 2007() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN TRC.154/2000 Dated 12/06/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: -------------------------------------- CHANDRAPRABHA CHARITABLE TRUST, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI.M.J.VIJAYAPADMAN, VIJAYA MAHAL, KALPETTA NORTH, WYNAD DISTRICT, KERALA. BY ADV. SRI.DALE P.KURIEN RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS: -------------------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX, TRIVANDRUM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY(TAXES), GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. ADV. SPL.GOVT.PLEADER (TAXES) SRI.MOHAMMED RAFIQ THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.KOSHY, Ag.CJ & K.T.SANKARAN, J. =========================== R.P.No.964 of 2007 in T.R.C.No.154 of 2000 =============================== Dated this the 23rd day of January, 2009. O R D E R Koshy, Ag.CJ. The contention of the review petitioner is that the judgment under review was erroneously decided and observations in State of Kerala v. M.P.Shanti Verma Jain (1998 (6) KTR 461) is not applicable to this case. If the judgment is erroneously decided, remedy of the petitioner is to approach the Honourable Supreme Court. A review petition cannot be equated to a petition for re- hearing of the matter or as an appeal petition. No grounds are made out to review the judgment and accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. J.B.KOSHY, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE. bkn/-