1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 1414 OF 2009 Mohammed Yusuf Musa Patni @ Yusuf Musa Patni ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. M.Y. Sayani for the Petitioner Mr. A.S. Gadkari, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: AUGUST 12, 2009 P.C.:- The petitioner in this petition claims several reliefs. One of the reliefs is that the State C.I.D. or any other investigating agency should investigate the complaints filed by the petitioner against respondent No.3. We direct respondent No.2 to look into the complaints, and whatever course is needed to be taken in terms of law be taken immediately. 2 2. The second relief claimed is that the order including the name of the petitioner in the List of “Known Mawalis” should be deleted. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits, on instructions, that the name of the petitioner is not included in the List of Mawalis. However, his name has been recommended, and the Government has not yet taken any decision. Since the name of the petitioner has not been included in the List of Mawalis, therefore, the petitioner’s claim is immature. 3. Another relief claimed is against the deletion of the petitioner’s name from the Mohalla Police Peace Committee. It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that officers of the police station and the Commissioner of Police include the respectable persons’ names in the Mohalla Police Peace Committee, so that they have better interaction with people of the area, and are able to make peace and tranquility. These committees are not statutory committees. The petitioner has 3 no right to continue in such committees, much less has a statutory right to get it enforced through a Writ Petition. 4. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J.