THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3737 OF 2011 Dated: 27.12.2011 Between : Rana Pratap Singh and 2 others … Petitioners And Ranjeet Kumar Singh and others … Respondents The Court made the following:- THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3737 OF 2011 O R D E R: This revision petition is filed against the order dated 05.07.2011 in I.A.No.149 of 2008 in O.S.No.39 of 2003 on the file of the Court of IV-Addl. District Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B. Nagar. The revision petitioners are the defendants 1, 2 and 4 in the suit, which is filed by the respondents 1 to 3 herein for partition of the suit schedule properties. I.A.No.149 of 2008 was filed by the revision petitioners under Order VII Rule 11 of C.P.C. for rejection of the plaint contending that the suit schedule properties were already partitioned on 17.01.1955 and the present suit is a mere abuse of process of law. The said application was dismissed by the Court below by order dated 05.07.2011 and aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. Learned counsel for the petitioners vehemently contended that the dismissal of the application merely on the ground that the document was not produced is unsustainable. It is true that the application was dismissed observing that the petitioners failed to produce the document to substantiate their claim that the suit schedule properties were already partitioned. However, as rightly held by the Court below, the question whether the suit properties were already partitioned or not requires consideration after full-fledged trial and no finding as such can be recorded at this stage. At any rate, none of the clauses under Rule 11 of Order VII C.P.C. are attracted and therefore, the dismissal of the application by the Court below cannot be held to be erroneous on any ground whatsoever. Accordingly, the Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. ___________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 27.12.2011 Ivd