-? , IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATISGARH AT BILASHPUR Writ Petition (S) No.,^............^A^................Of 2011 »•• i-ys ,- ^. /y Petitioner: Respondents: ^AS? .• ;•'/ / r2W/(/^ ^A^ ^ ^^/ ^ -,..'• (il (2) (3)" (4) Ajay Hariharno S/o Late Balmukund Hariharno, aged about 35 years, R/o In front of Alok Sadan, New Deepak Nagar, Durg (C.G.) VERSUS The General Manager (Network-1) Business & Operations Performance Monitoring, Local head Office, S.B.I., P.B. No. 6, Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal- 462011. The ssistant General Manager (Administration) Disciplinary Authority, State Bank of India, Disciplinary Proceedings Section, Administrative OfBce, 1st Floor-Byron Bazar, Raipur(C.G.). The Regional Manager Region-3, Regional Controller 85 Commercial Office, State bank of India, Sector-1, Bhilai (Chhattisgarh). The Branch Manager, State bank of India, Branch-Bemetara, District-Durg, Chhattisgarh. WRIT BETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ^t INDIA ^^^^. 's-l ,-fSy-v% | 's^ s s Versits Ajay Harilianio The' • Qeneral Msnager (Nenyork-1) Business & Operations Perfbrmance Noiutoriag & Ofhers Dr. Oni Prakash Yadav, couiisel for the petitioner. li7'-' Counsel for fhe petitioner at tlie outsct waiits to wittidraw petition wi.th liberty to avail tlie alteiTiative .rera.edy of filtng appeal befbre the department. He however subinits that direction inay ~be issued to the appellate authorit}r to dec-ye the appeal expecUtiousIy. The petitioner is pei-mittsd to wiftidraw fhis petition with the aforesaid "libertv. Necdless to state tbat in the eventuality of Sling aiiy appeal by the petitioner, fhe saiae would be decided as expeditiously as possible ili accordaace wifh law. It is inade clear that this coart has aot expressed anv opinion on ihe merits of the case and fhe authority concemed would be ar •libert}r to decide fhe represeatation s'lrictly in acconiance with law. Sd/- Pritin&er