IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22478 of 2010 1. MD.RIJWAN KUMAR SON OF MD. JUMNAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DAULATPUR, P.S. KALAYANPUR, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR 2. PAWAN KUMAR SON OF PREM LAL MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SARI KUMHAR, P.S. WARISNAGAR, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 18.08.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Petitioner’s prayer for grant of bail was earlier rejected by order dated 12.10.2009 as contained in Annexure- 1. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that although the trial has begun and the witnesses are being examined, however the petitioner deserves to be allowed bail since there is no material against him. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that since the trial is in progress, the request of the petitioner for bail deserves to be rejected. Considering the submissions of the parties, I do not find any new ground to take a different view. However, since the trial is in progress the same be expedited. This application stands disposed of. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)