IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2009 / 13TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 14715 of 2009(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- S.KAVITHA, AGED 32 YEARS, D/O.SARADAMMA, CHOORALIL VEEDU, NEENDAKARA P.O., NEENDAKARA VILLAGE, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM DISTRICT, KOLLAM. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLAM WEST CIRCLE, KOLLAM. 4. UMESH @ SIVA, S/O. SUBRAMANIYAN, VADAKKEMANA, THANNIKKATTIL VEEDU, KADAMPUZHA P.O., PADINJARENIRAPPU, MALAPPURAM. 5. ROOPA, W/O. SREENI, PALAKKAD MADOM, ANCHALUMMOODU, KOLLAM. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.A. SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) 14715 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 3RD DAY OF MAY, 2009. J U D G M E N T Raman, J. Alleging that the petitioner is harassed by the third respondent and seeking necessary direction restraining the police officials from such continued harassment that this writ petition is filed. The story goes that the petitioner, who is the mother of two children had been visiting the house of the 5th respondent who was the tuition teacher of her children. The 4th respondent who is the brother of the 5th respondent's husband was introduced to the petitioner by the 5th respondent. Petitioner is an LIC Agent by profession and in connection with the policy taken for the 4th respondent, the Account Number of the petitioner was given to the 4th respondent and it is said that some amounts were deposited in that account without her knowledge and she is not involved in any criminal case. However, petitioner is also asked to visit the police station more than one occasion. WP(C) 14715/2009 :2: 2. The learned Government Pleader, on instruction, submitted that pursuant to a complaint received from the public, an enquiry was made and a crime has been registered against the petitioner and it is in connection with the enquiry and investigation in to the said crime that the petitioner is asked to come to the police station. 3. In the above factual situation, we cannot grant any relief to the petitioner. She may work out her remedies under the criminal law. The writ petition is dismissed. P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE. KNC/-