^ s^ K- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH Coram : HON'BLE SHRIRAJEEV GUFTA, C.J. & HON'BLESHRI SUNILKUMAR SINHA, J. APPELLANT/ PETiTIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT APPEAL N0. 75 of2009 Rahul Kumar Bhedlya, aged about 34 years, S/o. h^mta Prasad Bhediya, at present working as a Pharmacist Grade-11, Community Health Centre, Bhanupratappur, Distrtet Kanker (C.G.), Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretar/, Department of Health and FamiiyWelfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur,(C.G.) 2. Director, Public Health and Family Welfare Department, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Medical and Mealth Officer, Kanker, DistriGt Uttar Bastar, K^inker (C.G.) 4. Dr. Anil Pashine, Block Medical Officer, Community Health Centre, Bhanuratappur, Uttar Bastar, Kanker (C.G.), 5. Block Medica! Officer, Communitv Health Centre Antagarh, Uttar Bastar, Kanker (C.G.) WRIT APPEL UNDER SECTION 2 OF THECHHATTISGARH HIGH COUFtT (APPEAL TO D!VISIONBiNCH)RUUES:2006 Present: Shri Vishnu Koshta, learned counsei for the appellant. Shri Kishore Bhaduri,leamedAdditional Advocate General forthe State/respondents No. 1,2, 3and 5. JUDGMENT -. (27th Mareh, 2009) The following judgment of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: 'Learned counsel for the parties are heard on admission. " "'mw -^' t. '!>.,..-di M 2) Appellant - Rahul Kumar Bhediya has filed this writ appeal against the impugned order dated 11.02.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No.898/2009. 3) The appellant/petitioner had fiied the writ petition for the following reljefs: "(i) That.this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a Writ Of nature of mandamus / certiorari and quashed the impugned transferred order dated ).01.2009 (Annexure P/3), in the interest ofjustice. (ii) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entlre record of the petitioner service and complain for perusal of this Hon'ble Court. (iii) If, any relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitionertogetherwith cost ofthe petition." 4) The petitioner, thus in substance, was seeldng quashing of the order dated 20.01.2009 (Annexure P/3 in the writ petition) whereby the petitioner was transferred from Bhanupratappur to Kiskodo. 5) During the course of hearing, we were informed that both the places i.e. Bhanupratapur and Kiskodo are situated within the same district Kanker. It also transpired that the petitioner is at his present place of posting i.e. Bhanupratappur for the last about four years. 6) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, we do not find any infirmity either in the order dated 20.01.2009 whereby the appellant was transferred from Bhanupratappur to Kiskodo or in the impugned order dated .r ;.^.;.- ....—•—- tKlr:i. Uilhi' ^ nirnmi 11.02.2009 whereby the learned Single Judge has declined to interfere in the matter of petitioner's transfer. 7) The writ appeal, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissedsummarily. ^-—~~~ CAT~' F SUNIL KUMAR SINHA Sd/- Chief Justice