IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1092 of 2008 AMIR DAS @ AMIR DAS MEHINZA, SON OF LATE VAKIL DAS MEHINZA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KENDI, P.S. KHAIRA, DISTRICT JAMUI, AT PRESENT POSTED AS PROBATION OFFICER, SUB- DIVISIONAL PROBATION OFFICER, BHABUA (KAIMUR)…………………………………………………..…………PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 3. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, JAMUI 4. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BHAGALPUR 5. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BHAGALPUR 6. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, JAMUI 7. THE OFFICER INCHARGE, KHAIRA, P.S. DISTRICT JAMUI 8. GORAKH TATI, SON OF LATE DOMAN TATI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KARNAWADA, P.S. KHAIRA, DISTRICT JAMUI…………..RESPONDENTS ----------- 4. 09.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has filed this writ application for quashing of the first information report of Khaira P.S. Case No.142 of 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties are on inimical terms and complaints were filed against the prosecution side by the petitioner and others on account of which this mala fide prosecution has been launched by the informant. A counter affidavit has been filed in which it is stated that after investigation, the - 2 - case has been found true under Sections 341, 323, 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and charge sheet has already been submitted. The allegations in the first information report make out a case of cognizable offence. Charge sheet has also been submitted in this case and, therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain the prayer of the writ petitioner. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Petitioner may avail his remedy, as available to him under law, before the proper court at appropriate stage. B.T (J. N. Singh, J.)