IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA FIRST APPEAL NO. 72 OF 2006 SHRI SANTAN DOMINGOS COELHO, BARDEZ, GOA. ... Appellant Versus SHRI SHANTARAM UPI SHIRODKAR AND 4 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Nitin Sardessai, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. J. P. Mulgaonkar,Advocate for Respondents. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 17th June, 2011 P.C.:- Heard Shri N. Sardessai, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant and Shri J. P. Mulgaonkar, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. After hearing the matter for some time, both the learned Counsel sought time to explore the possibility of a settlement with regard to the claim put forward in the above proceedings. Accordingly, both the learned Counsel have produced the consent terms dated 16.6.2011 signed by all the parties to the above appeal as well as their respective Counsel and prayed that the appeal be disposed of in terms of the said consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.The parties who are present in the Court along with their respective Counsel have accepted the said consent terms. The undertaking given by the appellant at para 4 is accepted. 3. In view of the said consent terms, I pass the following order : O R D E R (i) The appeal is partly allowed. (ii) The impugned judgment and award dated 17.1.2006 is modified in terms of the said consent terms and the Claim Petition No.13/2003 stands disposed of in terms of the consent terms. (iii) The appeal stands disposed of accordingly with no orders as to costs. 4. At this stage, Shri J. P. Mulgaonkar, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents prays that in terms of the said consent terms a sum of Rs.25,000/- deposited by the appellant as mentioned at para 2 of the said consent terms be allowed to be withdrawn by the respondents. As such, the Registry is directed to allow the respondents to withdraw the said sum of Rs.25,000/- along with interest accrued thereon, if any, in accordance with law. F. M. REIS, J. at*