IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.728 of 2010 Nagendra Mishra Versus State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 03. 12.07.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State as also the respondent nos. 3 and 4. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 4, who is alleged to have been kidnapped by the petitioner. It has been stated on behalf of the respondent no. 4 that the allegation of her kidnapping against the petitioner is absolutely false and she herself had taken the decision of marriage and got married with the petitioner in the office of Registrar, Marriage, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) and also gave birth of a female baby on 30.10.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation of kidnapping is absolutely incorrect for the simple reason that petitioner and respondent no. 4 both decided to marry against the wishes of their parents. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 3, who is father of the respondent no. 4 submits that his daughter was kidnapped by the petitioner, as such, truthfulness of the fact would come after thorough investigation. 2 A counter affidavit has been field on behalf of the respondent no. 1 wherein it has been stated that further investigation reveal that respondent no. 4 and petitioner had married on their own will and the case appears to be a mistake of fact as observed by S.D.P.O. however no final decision has been taken as yet. Considering the submission of the parties, in the opinion of the court, let the investigation of Sadar Sitamarhi Police Station Case No. 742 of 2009 be completed without further delay and upon completion of the investigation police report be submitted forthwith. Till submission of the police report no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner, Nagendra Mishra as also the respondent no. 4, Lal Hisariya @ Smt. Ratika Mishra @ Ratika Hisraiya in connection with the aforesaid police case. The writ application stands disposed of. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)