IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 289 OF 2008 Nandmuamr Gopal Shinde ..... ...... ......Applicant. V/s Shashikant Sadashiv Tilekar & Ors. ...... ......Respondents. Mr.D.M.Gupte, Adv. For the applicant. Mr.Dhavale, Adv. For the respondents. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. DATED: 26th AUGUST 2008. PC: This revision application is filed by an unsuccessful tenant against whom a decree for eviction and possession came to be passed by the Small Causes Court, Pune. The landlord had instituted a suit for possession mainly on two grounds viz. (i) that the tenant has not been using the premises for more than six months preceding the filing of the suit as he did not require the same and (ii) that the landlord had reasonable banafide requirement of the premises in question. The trial Court decreed the suit and an appeal preferred by the tenant has been dismissed by the District Judge, Pune. Aggarieved thereby this revision is filed. It is undisputed that the tenant is working in railways and is stationed at Kalyan. He has been allotted a servant quarter by railway since 1997. Both the Courts below have recorded finding in that regard against the tenant. The learned counsel for the 1 revision applicant has contended that the tenant' s niece by name Nitin and his mother are occupying the tenanted premises. Even on this count after appreciation of evidence the Courts below have recorded finding that the claim of the tenant that his niece is residing in the tenanted premises is devoid of any substance. The claim of the landlord on the ground of reasonable bonafide need for personal occupation has been held to be genuine and thus decree has been passed. Perused the impugned order. The same does not call for interference as the Courts below have taken possible view of the matter. No case is made for interference. In the result revision is dismissed. 2. At this stage learned counsel for the tenant submits that tenant be granted reasonable time to vacate the tenanted premises. The prayer is opposed by the learned counsel for the landlord. However having regard to the facts and circumstances I am inclined to grant six months time to the applicant-tenant to vacate the tenanted premises subject to his filing an undertaking in this Court that he shall vacate the tenanted premises within a period of six months from today and he shall not create any third party interest in the suit premises or part with possession thereof and shall continue to pay the rent regularly till he vacates the premises. On such undertaking being filed the judgment and decree for eviction and possession shall not be executed for a period of six months. Undertaking to be filed in this Court within a period of three weeks from today. 2