IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22250 of 2010 UMESH YADAV @ UMESH PRASAD YADAV S/O LATE SIYA RAM YADAV, R/O VILLAGE-LAGMA, P.S. KAHALGAON, DISTRICT-BHAGALPUR. --PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 3 10.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon copy of the case diary which is up to paragraphs 102 dated 17.5.2010. Petitioner is named accused in this case which appears squarely covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of George Pentiah V. State of Andhra Pradesh; 2008 (12) SCC 531. More so, parties appear to have settled their dispute and filed petition for compromise. If it is so and the informant, by appearing as witness, supports factum of compromise with his free will and consent without any coercion and also stood as one of the bailers, the petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) 2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in S.C. S.T. P.S. Case no.76 of 2008, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad