1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 9184 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders. appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. WRIT PETITION NO.:9184 OF 2010 *** Habib Shamsoddin Mujawar And Ors VERSUS Vimal Namdev Waghmare *** Mr. Kulkarni Krishna K., Advocate for Petitioners *** 1. This writ petition takes exception to the order passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Tuljapur below Exhibit-36 in Regular Civil Suit No.179 of 2008. The Respondent herein, who is original plaintiff, filed application for police protection. The said application came to be allowed by order dated 3rd July, 2010 which is impugned in this writ petition. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner would submit that there is no any provision under which the civil Court can entertain such application and grant police protection. Therefore, according to learned 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 9184 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders. appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. counsel for the Petitioner, such application should not have been entertained by the concerned Court. 3. Though the Respondents are served, none appears for them. 4. From perusal of the impugned order, it does not disclose that under which provision of law application for police protection was filed by the Respondent and under which provision of law such application was entertained by the court concerned. From careful reading of the impugned order, it appears that, there are no convincing and cogent reasons assigned by the concerned Judge for allowing such application. If the Court wanted to entertain an application for police protection, convincing and elaborate reasons should find place in the order. However, as stated earlier, no any reasons are assigned by the concerned Court. In that 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 9184 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders. appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. view of the matter, the impugned order is quashed and set aside. Writ petition is allowed to above extent. The same stands disposed of. [S. S. SHINDE, J.] Dated:10/10/2011. ans/9184