mrIIJyyggggguyW W4 (y IN THE HIGH COURT OF WADPYA PRkDuSH AT JABAL3UR @»{5Lw No$%bL OF 1991 %ISC.PETITION PETITIONER: ‘R.K.Shrivastava, aged fortyhfive years, S/o.Shri L.N.$hrivastava, Occupation:Ex.Employee of the State Bank cf inala, ra$ident of Llnk Road Bllaspur WAHQIL & DISTRICT BILAS”UR [{M.-.)o - VerSus ‘= BE$PONDENTS: $tate ThrOugh:Ilts Bank of Chairmanccdm-Managing India, Director, Central Office, ‘J Admlnlstratlve Bulldlng, Wadam Cama Road BOMB&Y (MAHARASHTRA) Deputy Managlng D1ractor(9&8)y ~cum—Appellate Authority, .B I., g Central Of?ice, Administratlve Bldé., Madam Gama Road BGMBAY (riAHARASHTRA) Chief Staté Bank General of Manager, India, E Locai Head Office, BHOFAL (M.P.). General Manager (Operations), State Bank of Ind1a, Local Head Office, BH013AL (M u .) . PETITION UNDEE ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR WRITS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORABI MANDAMUS ?ROHIBITION ETC. AND FOR APPBO?RIATE FURTHER DIRECTIQNS; The etitioner, named—above, begs to state‘as p Te petitioner was initially recruited as h in the services of the $tate Bank of India" He was f 4 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION 1906 of 1991 R.K.S‘m‘ivastava. VERSUS State Bank of India & Othsrs. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTTCLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA $3: Han’ble Shri Satish K. A0}1aihotri. J. Fresem: None for the petitioner. None for the respondents. . ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 18 day of September, 2009) 1. The mamr is cailed for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in \ pursuing the matter. y). 3. Registiy is directed to send a copy ofthis order to the petitioner, forthwith. J 131 View ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/ SAT 13H K. AGNIELOTRI Judge Amit y .