IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.686 of 2008 RAM NARAIN CHOUBEY ……Petitioner Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Lallan Singh 3. Shiv Parsan Singh 4. Shiv Kumar Singh 5. Ramji Singh 6. Jitendra Singh …..Opposite parties ----------- 2. 15.12.2008. This revision application has been preferred against the judgment dated 21.5.2008 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Bhojpur, Ara in Case No. G.R. 2940 of 2001, Trial No. 1027 of 2008, thereby the opposite parties have been convicted under Sections 447, 341 & 323 I.P.C. and have been let out after due admonition under Section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the court below has wrongly acquitted the opposite parties under Section 379 of the IPC and has released them under Section 3 of Probation of Offenders Act. However, on perusal of impugned judgment it appears that the court below has acquitted the appellant under Section 379 I.P.C. after due appreciation of the evidence and has also rightly released the opposite parties under Section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act. This court is not inclined to interfere in the impugned order. Accordingly, this application is rejected. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)