1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.357 OF 2007 Mahadeo Maruti Pawar (since deceased by his heirs & LRs) 1 Prakash Mahadeo Pawar 2 Smt.Satyabhama Mahadeo Pawar ...Petitioners vs. Sou Bhagirithi Shripati Pisal (since deceased through her L.Rs) 1A Tanaji Shripati Pisal 2 Shri Balkrishna Babuo Pawar 2A Smt.Malan Balkrishna Pawar 2B Madhukar Balkrishan Pawar 2C Lalasaheb Balkrishna Pawar 2D Shivaji Balkrishna Pawar 2E Sou.Shobha Shivaji Wetal ...Respondents Mr.R.R.Galange for the petitioners Mr.Bhushan Walimbe for respondent nos.1A, 2A to 2E and 3 to 5 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : MARCH 2, 2010 P.C.: . Not on board. Taken on board. 1 On the oral prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the order dated 23 rd February 2010 is recalled and the petition is restored. 2 The petitioners are the original plaintiffs. In a suit filed in the year 1980, the petitioners applied for amendment of the plaint. By the impugned order, the said application has been allowed partly and a part of the amendment has not been allowed. Considering the fact that the suit is of the year 1980 and considering the stage at which the amendment was applied for, this is not 2 a case where interference can be made in writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The order is interlocutory in nature which capable of being challenged in the Appeal which may be preferred by the petitioners against the decree passed in the suit if the same be adverse to the petitioners. 3 Subject to what is observe above, Petition is rejected. JUDGE