HIGH.COURT OFTHB CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (Si No. 3829 of 2010 Petitioae? Respos&desats Salik Ram S/o Late Shri Basudev Lal Patel, aged about 46 years, occupation ser^ice, posted as Accouutaat m tiie Office of Distiict Education Officer, Raigarh (CG), R/o Kotra Road, Vikas Nagar, Raigarh (CG) Versias The State of Chhattisgarh, through tlie Secretar}r, School Education Departnient, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawaii, Raipur (CG) The Director, PubUc Instruction, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG) 3 District Education Otlicer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG) 4 The Pruicipal, Goveranient High School Jaiaraga, Dhai'amjaAgarh, District Raigarh (CG) WritPetitiou iiadef Aiticle 226 ofthe Constitution ofladia Appearassce: Mr. Kanial Kisliore Patel, Advocate for tiie petitioner. Mr\ U.N.S. Deo, Govt Advocat, for flie State/respondents on advaTice copy. ORAL ORDBR (2S.07.2010) 8UNIL KUMAR SIHHA. J. Heai'cl, /lkhe petitioner is workiiig on th.e post ofAccountaat in the office of District Educatiou Officer, Raigarh. By iinpugned order dated 15,7,2010, tiie petitioner has been traasferred froni Raigarh to Govt. Hlgii School, Jamraga, Dharamjaigarh on adniinistt'ative grounds. LeaiTiecl counsel for tlie petitioner SLibmits tliat tlie petitioner was posted iu. Raigaiii siiice 2008, ttierefore, accorduig to tlie traasfer \policy, he should not have been tai'aiisferred because he has not @ W.P.(S)Nn-38WQf20in a, completed 2%> year^ at Raigarh. He .plso prgiies th^t the ri^iighter of fhe petitioner is stud3^iag m local mstitution in Class 12th, fherefore, her sttidie$i may al^o be jeopanliy^s on apeoi^nt of t?*Rnsfer of the petitioner, So far as policy relating to transfer js concemed, t1hat does not confer any right to the goveroment servant to claim isssiance ofwrit on the groiinds coTitained in the policy, The policy has no statiitory affect The policy is simply a giiirieline to the concemed dithorities. Therefore, the p<atttioner hes nof lega1 right to pray for is^iiance ofwrit on the contents ofthe policy, So far as groiind relatiiig to child of the petitioTier is concemed, we note that it m not a Tnid-se.ssion trRnsfer. Moreover this giT>iinrt i^ not available to a govemment seTVRnt to prpy for qiiashment of transfer order by the court: of law. The transfer is aa incidence ofservitce^ no peTtson working on e trRDsfer^ble post c^n make his cIaiTn for po^ting ?it a pei'ticiilar place. Tt is for the employer to see as to who shoiild he posted st which place; keepiBg in mind the better fiirjctioning of the dep.Rrtmenf as al.so the pTihIic interest llDless the order of transfer is ^hown to be viti^teril by mslafide.s or extraneoiis considei'ations or it is shown fo be pas^ed ageiBst eny stattltory Riile or the Act^ normelly ^iich ordeT-s are not to he interferefl by a co^irt oflaw, is 1'he settled view ofthe Apex C/oiirt in Tnaoy cases, For the foregoing reasons, I do not fmd any s.iihstance in the writ petifrion, The petition m lishle to he rtismissed and is hereby dismisssed, Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge