S.B. : WRTT PKTTTTO^ /S' TTM.Il 'ETITIONER 'OT'S'O^,' 3< f.^r"'^ ^: JH.1^3rt--'-T|JU'IL.T| 1 •¥' ?TT QFTTTTnXT T7 ^v .tS-i i r'r^ 11 A r<^lj-\ \^ Smt. Reena Paadev Wo Shri Raieev Pandey, ag-sd 35 yrs Lectorer : Stals Council of Educational Trainins Research Centre ;Raipur Distt - Raiour r~<rz '^'•<J VERSUS : 1. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Through: The Secretary to the Govt. of Clihattisgarii. SchooJ Education Department, Mactralaya: Raipur CG 2. Tne District Edyca'doa. Ofiicer; Raipur CG 3. The Director. State Council of Educational Training and Research Cestrs; Raipur, Distt- Raipur CG NTjR]? ARTICLE 226 OF THR CONSTITI JTi 1^J±\. ^~Ut- 1. ^."•^^3—3—r .i^ij—.v^'^-/-sL J. A ±j-^ 1u''\^7j.\L5 4. -S. -1. '^' 4. -. )N01 rKTF^TA l^l^lr\. Present: Shri Asurag Shrivastava, Advocats for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi- Panel Lawyer fbr the State/respondents. T?^^,^.^^ ^^ I Ot^ ^]^-,. .^f A n 1 /'?nA-7''i (r'S.SSSG QH lo-' OHy 01 ^ipHl, ^UU/ 1 1, Leamed counssl apoearine fbr the petitio.ner as wei] as for tiie State/respondeHts jointly submit that the fact and question of law involved in tiie nreserit writ netition are the sams to tliat of in Yashwant Kumar V; Wlll ^--1 Ip and (II) MPJR-CG 96}. w]iich has beec '^ disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed coiinsel spDearise fbr the resDondente does not cciitrovert the said suomission. 2, Accordinglv, the WTit petitio" is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Bharadwsi Vs. TI.T. Corporation, Durg another (Supra), su&ject to verification of tlie fact as to whetfaer tlie petitioner bas acquired B.Ed Examination Ceil'ificats on her own expenses as oer ths circulars 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether she faas beea naid t>vo advaiice iacrements or not. No order as to costs, Sd/- . Satish K.Agnihotri JuQge -fc- illbIlSSh