Civil Revision No. 6192 of 2008 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6192 of 2008 Date of decision: 19.4.2010 Subhash Chander ...Petitioner Versus Harjeet Singh @ Sukdarshan Singh And another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate and Mr. Divanshu Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amar Vivek, Advocate for the respondents S.D.ANAND, J. The learned counsel for the parties are not in position to dispute that the judgment recorded by the learned Appellate Authority cannot be averred to be a judgment in the real sense. Through out the judgment, all that learned Appellate Authority has done was to notice the respective pleadings and presented stances of the parties. The judgment under challenge does not contain any discussion of the points under adjudication. In the light of foregoing discussion, the petition shall stand allowed. The parties, through their learned counsel, are directed to appear before the learned Appellate Authority or the successor of that Court on 3.5.2010, which shall decide the appeal within one Civil Revision No. 6192 of 2008 -2- **** week therefrom i.e. 3.5.2010. In the meantime, the provisionally assessed rent shall be paid by the tenant to the landlord subject to ultimate adjudication. April 19, 2010 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge