IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 428 of 2004 (M/B) Ram Pratap s/o Sri Pooran Lal R/o Ward No. 7, Khatima, Tehsil and Post Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar …… Petitioner Versus 1. District Magistrate/Collector, Udham Singh Nagar 2. Tehsildar Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar 3. The Manager, State Bank of India, Branch Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar …... Respondents ……… Sri S. K. Mandal, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri J.P.Joshi Addl. C.S.C. for respondents 1 and 2. Sri Gaurav Joshi, Advocate on behalf of Sri S.K. Jain, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Sri S. K. Mandal, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri J.P.Joshi Addl. C.S.C. for respondents 1 and 2. Sri Gaurav Joshi, Advocate on behalf of Sri S.K. Jain, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Sri S.K.Mandal, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has now become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 27.04.2006 27.04.2006 A