IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 1339 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 04, 2011 Vinod Kumar …Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Ms.Reeta Kohli, Advocate for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. The instant appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against judgment dated 23.05.2011 rendered by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition. The replication which was sought to be filed before the learned Single Judge, has been filed today in the Court in which questions with regard to income of the appellant have been disputed as well as the question with regard to propriety rights in respect of six shops have also been contested. Therefore, we deem it appropriate to relegate the appellant to the remedy of filing a civil suit before Court of a competent jurisdiction because these disputed question of facts cannot be determined in the writ proceedings. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE August 04, 2011 Atul