IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-15058 of 2008 Date of Decision: August 06, 2008 Kewal Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS The State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Kuldeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Kamaldeep Singh Sidhu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. H.S. Kharbanda, Advocate, for respondent No.2. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No.86 dated 6.3.2008 lodged for commission of offences under Sections 452, 354 and 506 IPC with Police Station, Sadar, Kotkapura. Contention of the learned counsel is that petitioner and respondent No.2 were co-villagers. Certain disputes arose whereupon FIR came to be lodged. Now that compromise has been effected, respondent No.2- complainant has sworn an affidavit which has been placed on record as Annexure P-2. It has specifically Crl. Misc. No.M-15058 of 2008 [2] been stated in the affidavit that the complainant does not want to proceed with the case. Jaswinder Kaur, respondent No.2- complainant, as identified by Mr. H.S. Kharbanda, Advocate, is present in person and has also endorsed the factum of compromise. Having regard to the fact that continuance of proceedings would not serve any purpose in law and also because the complainant has made a statement as noticed above, this petition is allowed. Even learned counsel for the respondent State has no objection to the quashing of FIR in view of the compromise. Resultantly, FIR No.86 dated 6.3.2008 lodged for commission of offences under Sections 452, 354 and 506 IPC with Police Station, Sadar, Kotkapura, is hereby quashed. (AJAI LAMBA) August 06, 2008 JUDGE avin