G-)<-1'ZTa BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COUKT OF CHHATISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.Nq^.^'iS.<?.T?7/06 Petitioner ^. ^•^ •* \o^-^/\ ^C'Q?^...^ .'''SN^..--"" .....--:^3L9'<3'" .^•:^7^'" Santosh Kumar Si nha, S/o Late u.P. Sinha, Aged aboaut 48 years, iS./o Jeshpiimagar, Bazardod, Behind Keertan Bhawan, Jeshpur Dist. ^s- ,a-°- ^ Respondents: .r\' r>;-->' v> fc >A^.1<^^ 1). State of Chhatisgarh 'inrougn: yecretaiy, Water Resources Department DKS Bhawan, Raipur Dist. CG State. 2) Chief Engineer, water Kesources uepamnent, Bilaspur. CG State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE QF APROPRIATE WRni'S') /' ORDER fS'l /' DIREDCTION |S'|, ETC. %'^ (JV HI6H CGURT OF CHHATTISGAW AT BILASPiM W. P. CS) No. 7536 of 2006 Petitioner : Bhushan Khess Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and ano+her W. P. (S^ No. 7537 of 2006 Petitioner : Sontosh tomoir 5mha Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another And W. P. f51 No. 7539 of 2006 Petitioner : Lal Sai Ram Versus Respondents : State of ChhaftiS9arh and another 58: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihot-ri. J Mr. ICft. Nair, Advocate for ttie petitioners. Mr. Sushil Dubey, Sovemment Advocate for the respondents/State OR&ER (Passed on thisS* <lay of Janua.ry. 2007) 1. Leamed coun%l appearing for the petitioners submits that one T.5. Ramachandro Kurup simikirfy situated employee had filed a writ petition, being W.P. No. 670 of 2004, wherein this Court' after considering the facts of the case gronted liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the competent authority of tiie respondents. The competent outhority of the respondents, in tum, was directed to decide the case of •ttie petitioner on its own merit, in accordonce with law, as early as possible, prefe|nb(y, within three months from the date of receipt of Ihe representation. It is furrtier submitted that several o+her persons have also approached this Court in like monner and on •their representations. the competent outhority of the re^iondents has granted relief. Further, -rtie competent authorit/ of the respondents has dectined to gront ony relief to those persons, who had not approaAed to this Court. 2. In the light of the above aibmission, the petitioners are gronted tiberty to make detailed representations •t'o the competent authority of the respondents. On such representations, bein9 filed by the petrtioners, the competent au-thorrty of the respondents diall consider and decide the same on its own merit, in accordonce with kxw. as early as possible, preferably, wi+hin a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representations. 3. These writ petitions are accordmgly di^osed of. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of this order be placed on record in o'ttier connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge