Crl. Misc. No.M-14502 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-14502 of 2010 Date of Decision: July 5, 2010 Kulwinder Singh …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Deepak Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Abhishekh Chautala, AAG, Punjab. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner seeks the concession of pre-arrest bail in a case registered at the instance of Gurjant Singh alleging that his father had received a phone call from the petitioner that gold brick was available at half the market price. Counsel for the petitioner has contended that petitioner has not received any money and that there are vague allegations against him. It has Crl. Misc. No.M-14502 of 2010 [2] been vehemently urged that the story of the prosecution against the petitioner is not believable and that offence, if any, has been committed by the lady who had received the money as per the allegations in the FIR. I have heard counsel for the petitioner and gone through the police record. The allegations against the petitioner from the very beginning are that he was the one who had allured the father of the complainant to purchase fake gold brick. There are clear allegations against the petitioner. It appears to be a case of custodial interrogation. The connivance of the petitioner with his co-accused who have been granted the concession of regular bail cannot be ruled out. No extraordinary circumstances exist for the grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. July 5, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE