F- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BILASPUR D!V!S!OM BEMCH Coram : HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. & HON'BLE SHRS T.P. SHARSV1A. J. MANo. 952 of 2003 APPELLANT CLAiMANT ^ Smt. Dashoda Bai, Widow of the deceased Heera Ram Sahu, D/o. Bhoot Ram Sahu, aged about 22 years, R/o. Khopra, P.0. Khopra, P.S. Abhanpur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 3. 4. 5. 6. Rajkumar, S/o. Chetram Lohar, R/o. Juniya Para, Kanker, P.S. & Distt. Kanker (C.G.) (Driver of the Truck No. MP 23 D-2703). Anil Kaushik, S/o. Gajju Kaushik, R/o. & P.0. Kanker (Civll Line), Distt. Kanker (C.G.) (Owner of the Truck No. MP 23 D/2703). The Orienta! Insurance Company Ltd., (Through Divisionaj Manager, The Orientat insurance Company Ltd., Mandai Office, 2 Life Insurance Road, Pandri, Raipur, Tahsi! & Distt. Raipur (C.G.) (tnsurer of the Truck No. MP 23-D-2703). Johat Ram Sahu, S/o. Champa Lal Sahu, aged about 46 years. Rajni Bai, W/o. Johat Ram, aged about 42 years. Dwarika Prasad, aged about 15 years (Minor), S/o. Johat Ram (Respondent No. 4,5,6. They aEJ are R/o. Baktara, P.0. Kendri, Tahsit & P.S. Abhanpur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 173 OF IVIOTOR VEHICLEACT. 1988 Present: None for the appeiiant. r%..x ORDER (12tn January, 2009) The foliowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: None for the appellant. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. Consequently, M.C.P. No. 1058/2004 also stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ntmms