1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.658/2008 Shri Dinkar s/o Janardan Gajbhiye ...Versus... The Home Ministry of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary, Mantralaya, Bombay – 32 and others -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri A.S. Fulzele, APP for respondent Nos.1 to 3 - State] CORAM:- A.H. JOSHI & A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED :- 24.02.2009 1. None present for the petitioner even on second call. 2. On last two occasions, learned Advocate for the petitioner had sought time on account of being indisposed. 3. We have perused the writ petition and the contents of affidavit-in-reply filed by the State. We find that the averments contained in the affidavit-in-reply have not been disputed by the petitioner. 4. We are satisfied that investigation has been carried out in the proper direction. 2 5. The conclusion arrived at by the Investigation Officer seems to be reasonable, proper and well founded. 6. No further investigation through any other agency seems to be justified. 7. In these premises, petition has no merit and is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE ssw