IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4136 of 2009 Date of Decision: 27.7.2009 Sanjiv Sabharwal ......Petitioner Versus Omesh Kumar Opal and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Harshdeep Singh, Advocate, for Shri Gurdev Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral). Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned trial Court on 2.5.2007, whereby the evidence of the defendants was closed. The petitioner has challenged the said order after more than two years. The petitioner is a tenant and the challenge to the order closing evidence after two years shows that the only interest of the petitioner is to delay the proceedings. In view thereof, I do not find that any case for interference in exercise of the revisional jurisdiction of this Court is made out. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 27-07-2009 ds