1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7227/03 Nanu Ram vs. State & Ors. Date of order : 27/1/2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Hanuman Choudhary for the petitioner. Shri Zakir Hussain, Addl. Govt. Counsel for the respondent. ****** Heard learned counsel for the parties. The writ petition has been filed on the ground that when the petitioner applied for appointment, the respondents illegally denied the appointment to him. However, at the same time, they appointed the candidates lesser meritorious than the petitioner. It is contended that the petitioner was a member of Scheduled Caste and therefore he should have been appointed against the quota meant for his category. Learned counsel for the petitioner orally submitted that the petitioner was not given any additional marks for driving licence, for the qualification of graduation and also for the fact that he is a member of Home Guard. None of these facts are pleaded in the writ petition, therefore, obviously the 2 respondents cannot be expected to rebut them. Even otherwise, the petitioner has not named any single person who according to him was lesser meritorious in his category i.e. in the category of Scheduled Caste and yet is appointed in preference to the petitioner. I do not find any merit in this writ petition and the same is dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/