^ ^0 ^NGLEBENCH . ">^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition N0. ^^ lc> 12Q05 ^^''{K^''^-^' HON'BLE S.B. '^^^•^"' ^ " OTHER MATTER : ^- Ragunath Sahu, Aged about 50 years S/o. Shri Parsadi Sahu Occypation- Agricultural R/o. Vill. Tumadibod Tahsil Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS ^:1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The secretary Department of Revenue D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) -2. Board of Revenueof Chhattisgarh Circuit coyrt Raipur (C.G.) ^3. The Additional Colleetor District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Naib Tahsildar Dongargabn Disft. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Kharora Road, Tilda^Raipur <C.G.) ;.":':^ •••:':•• ..?. WRIT PEtlTION UirA 2&6/ 227 OF THE CONS'rlni.tllO^N^OF IKID1A i ^?-- - PETITIONER RESPONDENTS B fi'^ii'ilT': -^::ii'^^^ ^%.: >•j^ XI-HC-78 ^CTOI^TT^ <d'cq'«l<<I<90;t»-l^WI<?,RdWy'< W-f /Vt>. ^!>!(>^^-~ ?^F^2@0 3ir^p'raw;(<pr^%) SII^CTipTR'fi* WIT3IT$?Tri)li* '.-"V. B^irwt^Tfer an^CT 26.9.2005 Srnt. Savi'ta Tiwqri; couns^ Shri Y.S. Thakur, 6ovt. A< Meard. s The petitjoner hasprefet 226/227 of the Constitution o1 dated 20.5.2003 passed by th^ Revision No.ll8/A-68/2002-03| ActditionalCpllector.ftaJnandgao^ It appears from ttie encroached upon the govemmf Tehsildar, Don9argaon institu'te|l passed the or-ders on 31.12.t99( cand the petitioner.was asked tt^ as a fine. Bein9 aggrieved by moved a revision petition Additional Cotlector vide petitioner herein is entitled to fi but he has not preferred any ct)( imposition of fine amount of Rs. further held that calculation hts day and therefore.tremanded bef(}r® order <n<iIg<Bt*)l*<c<T*fIS><sl!'jfS|'(-(;l>(' ^^rf^Tanl<lyf"i'- for the petitioner. |v. for respondent Nos.l to 4. 1-red this writ petition under Article India being dggrieve<i by the order Board of Revenue, CHhattisgarh in fited against the order of learned rckrted 11.5.1999. ' record that the petitioner herein ;nt tand, as a resylt of which Naib •thpee cases r8gardin9 tf^^wss and ), 12.11.199&A 29.5.1991 re^ectively deposit Rs.20, Rs.20 <S Rs.IO per day said orders the petitioner herein the Additional Collectop and the doted 11.5.1999 hefd that the ile an tappeat dgainst the dispossession )peal, however, he has challenged t+ie 15,280/-. The Additional Collector has not been made on the basis of per ca^ back to the Naib Tehsildar "tne '& ^::^ ES^ !'iia Bliii ime \a»ff^i<mwfw-^hi<S6^fStv>»wy ii*ic»iwrw an^tT9iTR') ?RiT3ir^Tg>tii! Roshan !»[^?Ti(WF^{^<li£i) B^iTfSR^tfScrSfl^f -z^ with a direction to impose th Agajnstthis order the petiti< •l'hie';Bod l;of Revenue Chhi 'I":'-'t'~^'K]^^ vi •' • . ^. •••''•• d.isinisse3 -fhe saine. •":"-';i'iw;"i(i '' ! / ' '^; Now; the grievanceol liedring is not given to him. The Additional Collec 11.5.1999 and thereafter mor the petitioner is not being Additional Collector who dii order regarding imposition Moreoyer, •this wrjt petition frotnthedateoforderofRel In view of the above, hdis not beeh able to make o< under Article 227 of the Con( be dismissed and it is, accorc|i Consequently, M.(W.)P^ stand dismissed. hebrd <ni<ifn<Tli iiinYA'fei^l ^ ^arf^Tan^r ^ fine dmount after heanng the part-ies. jper preferred a revision petition before ^tMsgarh and the Revenue Board also the (wtitioner is -Hiat opporlunity of |t-or passed the order as back os on •than 6 years haye been etapsed and if then he isat liberty to approach the [ected •the Naib Tehsildar to pass the of fine after hearing the part'ies. [hasbeen filedafter 2 years4 months ^enue Bocu'd. I am of -the opinion that the petitioner it acase for interference by this Court' ititution of India, the petition is liable to ingly, dismissed. • No.3740/2005 & I.A. No.8295/025 also Sd/- LC.Bhadoo Judge r/FS/2005-20,000 ^