1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. O R D E R Smt. Ranjana Pandiya Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6779/2008 Date of Order : : 18/02/2009 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. P.S.Chundawat, for the petitioner. Mr. R.L.Jangid, Additional Advocate General for respondents. BY THE COURT: By the instant writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the condition incorporated in the Schedule appended to Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Service Rules, 2008 (for short 'the Rules of 2008' hereinafter) requiring a candidate applying for the post of Prabodhak having five years teaching experience without any break in any Govt. recognized educational institution/ educational project. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner 2 that the petitioner was given appointment by the Government Mahipal Sr. Secondary School, Sagvada on temporary basis and worked for the period as mentioned in the experience certificate Annex.1 and thereafter in Govt. Devendra Girls Sr. Secondary School, Dungarpur Annex.2. From the Certificate Annex.1, it appears that the petitioner was engaged on honorarium with effect from 19th August, 1993 to 16th March, 1994, 27th August, 1994 to 11th March, 1995, 22nd August, 1995 to 11th March 1996 and from 21st August, 1996 to 31st March, 1997 by Government Mahipal Sr. Secondary School, Sagvada and thereafter by a different school i.e. Govt. Devendra Girls Sr. Secondary School, Dungarpur from October, 1997 to December, 1997, January 1998 to March, 1998 and thereafter from September, 1998 to February 1999. The break in service in every year is of many months. This question came to be considered by this Court in Smt. Vishnu Kunwar Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others, SBCW No.8796/08 decided on 21.11.2008 wherein service experience came to be considered by this Court. The period of summer vacation, leave availed by incumbent after leave having been sanctioned by the employer, incumbent having consumed the period while undergoing training for para teacher on being sent by the State were considered to be not a break in service. In the instant case, it is not the case of the petitioner that the petitioner was either appointed on the post of Para 3 teacher or she was under training or she was on sanctioned leave or she was not allowed to work for summer vacation and therefore, in my view, the petitioner is not having five years teaching experience as required by the Rules of 2008 and therefore, she is not entitled for appointment on the post of Prabodhak. The writ petition has no force and it is therefore, dismissed. (H.R. PANWAR), J. rp 4 S.B.CIVIL MISC. STAY PETITION NO. 11796/08 IN S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6779/08 Date of order : 18/02/2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. P.S.Chundawat, for the petitioner. Mr. R.L.Jangid, Additional Advocate General for respondents. Since the writ petition itself has been dismissed, the stay petition stands dismissed (H.R. PANWAR), J. rp