WP(C) 6520/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. I.H. Borbhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. B. Devi, learned counsel for the N.F. Railway. The petitioner who was serving as Accounts Assistant in the N.F. Railway is aggrieved by Annexure-I order dated 16.09.2009 by which he was placed under suspension upon involvement in a criminal case in which he was detained in custo dy. Admittedly the petitioner is a civil employee in the Railway. If that be so, the jurisdictional court at the first instance, is the Central Administrative T ribunal, Guwahati. As per the provision of Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1984 and as per the decision in L. Chandrakumar vs. State of Assam and others re ported in 1997 (1) GLT (SC 1) , Central Administrative Tribunal is the court of the first instance and if the parties are aggrieved by the order passed by the T ribunal, they may approach the High Court by way of a writ petition which will b e entertained by the Division Bench. In view of the above, this Court having no jurisdiction cannot entertai n the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the libe rty to the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal, Guwahati Branch, if so advised.