1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.78 OF 2008 WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NOS.79, 95, 98 AND 99 OF 2008 M/s.Convenience Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. M/s. Ozo Media Estate Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents. .... WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NOS.80 TO 85 OF 2008 Dr. R.K. Anand. ...Petitioner. Vs. M/s. Ozo Media Estate Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents. .... Mr. Gagan Chhabra i/b. Mr. H. V. Chande for the Petitioners. Mr.Virag Tulzapurkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. P.K. Samdani and Mr. Venkatesh Dhond i/b. M/s. Prakash & Co. for Respondent No.1. Dr.Virendra Tulzapurkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sunil Patel i/b. Sunil & Co. for Respondent No.2. ..... CORAM :DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. February 8, 2008. P.C.: Counsel appearing on behalf of the parties are agreed that the facts of the aforesaid Arbitration Petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, are similar to those in Arbitration Petition (L) No.77 of 2008 which has been dismissed by an 2 order passed today. For the reasons contained in the accompanying judgment, the Arbitration Petitions shall stand dismissed. ......