S.B.Civil Second Appeal No.112/87 Date of order: - 26.4.2006 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. M.S. Purohit , for the appellant. Mr. Anuj Sehlot, for the respondent. ... The learned counsel for the respondent stated on 25.4.2006 that the respondent has purchased the property in dispute. The learned counsel for the appellant sought time to verify the fact. Today, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has received information on telephone that the matter has been settled between the parties. In view of the above, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant does not want to proceed with the appeal. The appeal of the appellant is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed. (PRAKASH TATIA),J. mlt.