IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.276 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.276 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.276 OF 2005 IN IN IN L.P.A.NO. OF 2005 L.P.A.NO. OF 2005 L.P.A.NO. OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1201 OF 1990 Mushir Ahmed Ansari .. Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.A.N.Maniyar for the Applicant. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr.H.D.Buch for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : 25.11.2005. DATE : 25.11.2005. DATE : 25.11.2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant, the learned AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 and the learned Counsel for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. The learned Counsel for the Appellant points out that the Respondent No.5 has been duly served and he undertakes to file an affidavit of service. Nobody is present on behalf of Respondent No.5. By this Civil Application Applicant is seeking condonation of 43 days delay in filing the Letters Patent Appeal. Perused the Civil Application. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)