[C-22 ^" ^n^r'^i IqiW 'STif^i 5b*iic»i ^ifia + "3"ST ^tl^ld<LI, ^Tll^^Ko. [^<y11<1li< 37T^T tRr^ HW^\{ 'g^j^"""—"••—•••—————^F^ ^^ '^^ST' 3Rn^?T'^H8;R ^rf^?r W.P.tSl PETITIONER RE8PONDENTS Versus 1. 2. 3. 4. Writ Petition under Articld S.B Hon'ble Shri Dhirendral couiisel 2.12.2008: Shri Somkaat Venna, Shri YS Thakur, Dy AG foit Heard, The petitioner has the respondents to consider caacellation of his tenaiaation the services of Guruji on 22.3.; clue process of law, prefenjed chi^(<n<flri 'HTR^rf ^ f^st <p3i<^i< ^3ti^TH3TT^T No.6731 of 2008 Nagei^dra Kiimar S/o Shri Gao.ga Ram Bajp^i, aged about 32 yeai's, Village Lawatcera, Post Lawakera, Block Farssfbahar, District Jashpur (CG) State| of Chhattisgarh, through the Secrc|taxy, Department of Rural aad Paacliayat Development, Maiitralaya, DKS Bhaw|aa, Raipur (CG) The | Secretary, Departinent of School Educ^tion aiid Tribal DKS Bhavan, Raipur (CG) The | Chief Executive Officer, Jaapad Panc^iayat, Farsabahara, District Jashpur (CG) Zila $: Missj >hiksha Kendra Rajiv Gaadhi Shiksha ^n, Jashpur (CG) 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia Mishra, J. for the petitioner. the State. this writ petltion for a direction to representation of fhe petitioner for >rder, as he has been terminated from. !002 (Annexure-P/3) wifhout foUowiiig [T^ <i<a4 ir,^ 1%%®®..'i 1 j 1^ ^. -'wc-22 ^^^" .f 3?T^r^RT i<rli<=h 3??^T »»^icb^ficl ^ + 's'sr ^II^H^I, ^Til^^Ko. facni^y 3TT^T ^^ r<9>).l HW^i ^^^ •'—'—'-——^^ ^^ ^^T" 'STT^T'^IT^R ^rf^er saalie Learaed counsel for th< pressiag fh.is petition at fhis ste fresh representation agamst representation is filed, fhe law laid down by fhis Cozut ia The State of Chhattisgarh & 2006. Leamed counsel for fhe disposed ofwifh fhe aforesaid In view of the submiss^ parties, fhe iastaat petition is to niake detaUed representatio] aU his grievaaces which are rai| days fix>in today, On such repr^ fhe same shall be considered withia a further period of 6 matter of Ram BUas Siagh (Su^ra) CM^f<n<i1i TTP:Mf ^ fe*<i1 <f^i^i< ^ ^rf^PRT ^TT^T petitioner subniitted fhat he is not |ge. However, he prays for Uberty to file his grievances and ia case, such raay be decided ia accbrdaiice wifh ^.P. No.3441/2003 (Ram BUas SinghV. ^fhers) vide order dated 13th Jaauary, ^tate has no objection if fhe petition is dlirection. Jous inade by learaed counsel for fhe lisposed ofwifh Uberty to fhe petitioner before the conceraed authority raismg >ed ia fhis petition wifhia a period of 15 ssentation beiag raade by fhe petitioner, 4nd decided by fhe concemed aufhorily m terms of fhe order passed ia the wdeks Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge [Tft^"^fe^r