IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH OCTOBER 2010 / 5TH KARTHIKA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 6374 of 2010() ----------------------------- CRMP.2395/2010 of SESSIONS COURT,KOLLAM .................... (CRIME NO.940/2010 OF PARIPPALLY POLICE STATION,KOLLAM DISTRICT) ... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED NOS.1,2,4,5,8,9 & 10: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. DILEEP, S/O.RAGHAVAN, AGED 25 YEARS, KADALUKANAKUNNIL CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, PARIPPALLY P.O., KOLLAM. 2. VINOD, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.VISWAMBHARAN, VINDHU BHAVAN, VELAMANOOR P.O. 3. VISWAMBHARAN, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.VASU, VINDHU BHAVAN, VELAMANOOR P.O. 4. S.ANILKUMAR, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.SIVASANKARAN, THAZHAM THEKKUM MEENADU VILLAGE, CHATHANNOOR. 5. THANKAMANI, AGED 33 YEARS, D/O.RAGHAVAN, KADALUKANAKUNNIL CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, PARIPPALLY P.O., KOLLAM. 6. RAJEEV, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.BABU, CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, POOVATHUR, VELAMANOOR P.O. KOLLAM. 7. K.ANILKUMAR, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O.KUNJAN, CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, POOVATHUR, VELAMANOOR P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.LIJU. M.P. Kss ..2/- ..2..... BA.NO.6374/2010 RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARIPPALLY POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. ......................................... B.A. No.6374 of 2010 .......................................... Dated: 27.10.2010 ORDER Petitioner, who are accused Nos.1,2,4,5,8,9 & 10 in Crime No.940/2010 of Parippally Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143,147,148,341 and 323 read with 149 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioners to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have their application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer on 10.11.2010 or on 11.11.2010 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioners shall thereafter be produced before the Magistrate who on being satisfied that the petitioners have been interrogated by the police shall consider and dispose of their application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed. This petition is disposed of as above. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj