IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 24TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 2ND ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 27804 of 2007(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ BINDU GEORGE, W/O.UNNIKRISHNAN, CHENGANARICKAL HOUSE, ASAMANNOOR P.O. POOMALA, KUNNATHUNADU, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.BABY RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE ASAMANNOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ASAMANNOOR P.O., (VIA), KURUPPAMPADY, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE VILLAGE EXTENSION OFFICER, ASAMANNOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ASAMANNOOR P.O., (VIA) KURUPPAMPADY, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. SHAIJA M.D., MALEKKUDI HOUSE, AIMURI P.O., PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. DEEPA PRAKASH, MAMPILLY HOUSE, KOZHIKKOTTUKULANGARA, VENGOOR, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. G.P. SHRI.A.J.VARGHESE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ========================== W.P.(C).No.27804 of 2007 ========================== Dated this the 24th day of September, 2007 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is an aspirant for the post of teacher in the special school managed by the Asamannoor Grama Panchayat. The contention of the petitioner is that she is better qualified than the two teachers, viz., respondents 3 and 4, who have been selected for the post. The petitioner does not have any case that the procedure, if any, prescribed for such selection has not been complied with. From the documents produced by herself, it is celar that the petitioner got far less marks than respondents 3 and 4. The petitioner could not bring home any case of malafies or undue favouratism in favour of respondents 3 and 4. Her only case is that she is more meritorious than the selected candidates, which are not reflected in the marks awarded to the candidates. Petitioner's self-assessment cannot be the basis of selection when three members of the selection committee have found w.p.c.27804/07 2 respondents 3 and 4 better suited than the petitioner. Therefore, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition and accordingly, the same is dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge.