IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P.s No. 7308 and 7309 of 1987 DATE OF DECISION : 24.01.2011 Surain Singh and others .... PETITIONERS Versus Financial Commissioner, Haryana, Chandigarh and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Som Nath Saini, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. D. Khanna, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Amarjit Markan, Advocate, for respondent No.3 (in both the petitions) * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J ( Oral ) This order shall dispose of Civil Writ Petitions No. 7308 and 7309 of 1987. Both these petitions have been filed by the landlords against the order dated 28.5.1987 (Annexure P-4), passed by the Financial Commissioner, Haryana, whereby two references, made by the Commissioner, Hissar Division, Hissar, against the order of ejectment passed in favour of the petitioners, were accepted and it was held that after entering into agreement to purchase the land, which was already in possession of the tenants-respondents No.3 in both the petitions, CWP No. 7308 of 1987 -2- relationship of tenant and landlord came to an end. Learned counsel for respondent No.3-tenant submits that during the pendency of these petitions, in pursuance of the earlier agreement, the landlords have sold the land in question to the tenants and executed the sale deeds dated 7.1.2004, 7.7.2004 and 20.5.2004. Learned counsel has filed photostat copies of those sale deeds in court today, which have been taken on record. Learned counsel submits that in view of the said facts, both these petitions, filed by the landlords, have become infructuous. Dismissed as having become infructuous. However, it will be open for the petitioners to get these petitions revived, if the aforesaid facts, as stated by learned counsel for respondent No.3, are found to be not correct. January 24, 2011 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE