1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated :: 06..06..2011 Coram:: THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE K. SUGUNA and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.ARUMUGHASWAMY Writ Appeal (MD)No.507 of 2011 S. Chitrasenan ... Appellant - Vs - 1. The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2. The Block Development Officer, Kodaikkanal Panchayat Union, Kodaikkanal, Dindigul. 3. The President, Vellakavi Panchayat, Vellakavi, Kodaikkanal Taluk, Dindigul District. ...Respondents Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 18.11.2010 of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(MD)No.866 of 2009. Prayer in WP(MD)No.866/2009:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue of a Writ of Certiorari Mandamus to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned suspension order issued by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.2033/01/A1 dated 15.07.2008 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the Petitioner in service with all attendant benefits. For Appellant :: Mr.Prasanna For Respondents :: Mr.K.Mahendran Special Government Pleader for R-1 Mr.K.Balasubramanian for R-2 - - - - - - - J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was delivered by K. SUGUNA, J.) This Writ Appeal is filed as against the order of learned Single Judge dated 18.11.2010 in W.P.(MD)No.866 of 2009. 2. The said writ petition has been filed challenging an order dated 15.07.2008 of the second respondent, by which the order of suspension dated 15.10.2007 has been confirmed. The learned Single Judge, by an order dated 18.11.2010 has dismissed the said writ petition. As against the same, this writ appeal has been filed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. Now, the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent has brought to the notice of this Court that already enquiry has been over and now the papers are pending before the first respondent for passing final order in the disciplinary proceedings initiated as against the petitioner, basing on which the suspension order has been passed. 4. In view of the above said submission of the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent, this Writ Appeal itself is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to pass a final order, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in the disciplinary proceedings initiated as against the petitioner in pursuance of the Charge Memo dated 07.07.2008. However, there will be no order as to costs. sd/- Assistant Registrar (P&A) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (C.S) To: 1. The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2. The Block Development Officer, Kodaikkanal Panchayat Union, Kodaikkanal, Dindigul. 3. The President, Vellakavi Panchayat, Vellakavi, Kodaikkanal Taluk, Dindigul District. + 1 cc to M/s.G.R.Swaminathan, Advocate, SR No.17398 + 1 cc to M/s.K.Balasubramanian, Advocate, SR No.17220 Writ Appeal (MD)No.507 of 2011 06.06.2011 Dpn/- RJ/15.6.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/