IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 15255 of 2002 Between: Sri Pavan Kumar, S/o Smt Deva Kanya Maharajgunj, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Endoments, Tilak Road, Boggulakunta, Abids, Hyderabad. 2 The Person-Managements, Sri Pandari Nath and Hanumanji Temple, Maharajgunj, Hyderabad. 3 Venugopal Inani, S/o. Late Shri Ramprasad Inani, C/o Hiranand Ramsukh, 15-9-56, Maharajgunj, Hyderabad-500 012. 4 Gangabishan Bajaj, S/o. Late Kishanlal Choudhry, 15-2-220, Maharajgunj, Hyderabad-500 012. 5 Ramesh Chandra Jhanwar, S/o Late Suresh Chandra Jhanwar, R/o Nanakram Hanutram, 15-9-48, Maharajgunj, Hyderabad-500 012. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.VIDYASAGAR Counsel for Respondent No.1: AGP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15255 of 2002 ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for a Writ of Certiorari to quash proceedings dated 10.08.2002 of respondent No.1 whereby he cancelled the permission granted earlier for renovation of Sri Pandarinath and Hanumanji Temple, Maharajgunj. 2. At the hearing, Sri M.Vidyasagar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that under the interim order granted by this Court on 27.08.2002 suspending the impugned proceedings, the renovation work was carried out and, therefore, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. 3. In view of this submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.19105 of 2002 is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 15.10.2008 v v