IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 430 of 2008 Between: M/s. Sai Suharathi Constructions, 1-7-115/401, Chaitanyapuri, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Managing Partner S.K. Sudheer. ..... PETITIONER AND The Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, Hyderabad Branch, H.No. 5-9-194, Chirag Ali Lane, Ground Floor, Hyderabad. Rep. by its Deputy General Manager. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:None appeared The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent in dispossessing the Petitioner’ Surety from her residential house bearing No.16-57, Krishna Nagar Colony, Gaddiannaram, Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, arbitrary and against principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the Notice.No.AFC/HB/2007-08/5-II/57, dated 02.01.2008 issued by the Respondent.” On 04.03.2008, no one appeared for the petitioner. Even today, there is no appearance for the petitioner despite the fact that the writ petition is coming up under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting its cause in the writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in default. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition in default, WPMP.No.451 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 7th MARCH, 2008 kvni