afrgik' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUR3 ~AT BILASPUR (C.Gn) wkm ‘EmTIou tee}? 71?’ ~61: 2003 EmWEEM ¥ §mgte B§H§k ,| B.B.Agrawé1 s/o Late gmi Mofd. Lax, §gea about 57 years R6%irea General Manager. State sahakari It;shi Am: Gramin Vikas Bank, &;aspur, Resident of Bilaspur, Tehsil and Distri ct BiWur (CG) . V //:‘¢‘3‘@ ‘‘g‘ V'Psimy'rri‘mém ‘i vibgké The State of Quhattisgarh, _ > wrough the Searetary Department of (Jo-Operative i. $ocie''ties. Mantralay. Q.K.S.Builaing. Raipur. ‘ 'Ifd'xsil aha District RaIEpnr LGG). The Registrar, H w-operative society Raivpur. Labhandi. gaipur. Tehsil and msuiat Raipur (CG). 3. Th$ maimanp . vikas. @hattisga‘rh Bank Limiteé. Rajya sahakaari Raipur, {rehsil kishi Am: mid Granin Distyict gaipur (66) g The Managing Dir-actor; Vikas gahattisgarh Bank Limited, gajya sahakari Raipur, Tehsil Krishi Au: and Gramin District Raipur (ca). M .g. Ag rawal . maiman. zila sahakari kishi Au: Gramin V vikas Bank Maryadlt, I Eilaspur. Tehsil and District Bilaspm' (CG). Ehe ala Ganesal sahakari Manager. KtiShi Aur Grain Vikas Bank \ Maryadit, Bilaspur, Tehsil and matrict Eilaspur (CG); iééééninms V/ menu: ammcms 226/227 or THE ceNSTITU-ng} Particula‘rsr of thé petitioner: As statéé in the éauée title amve. * n m HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH Z B§LASPUR WRIT PETQTION NO.2T17 OF 2003 PETlTiONER EB. Agrawai Versus RESPONDENTS The State of Chhawsgarh & Others {Writ Petiticm under Article 226/227 cf the Canstitu‘tion of §ndia) Singie Bench : Hon’bie 3hr? Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- NGne for ihe petitiener. ?“ Shri A.V. Sfidhay, Pane: Lawyer far we $iate. 1" ORDER (ORAL) (Passed an tms as“ day of Mamh, 2010) ?he matter is caized for hearing twice. On bath occasmns, nane apgaears nor is any representaiéon made on behaif 0f the petitioneL The petitioner may not be imerested in the matter. 2) in View 0f the abave, me writ pet§tion is dismissed fos’ want ef prosecutien. Thakur