IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No.216 of 2008. Date of decision: 23.07.2008. Pradeep Sharma ….Petitioner Versus Teer Singh ….Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Dev Darshan Sud,J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitoner: Mr.Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Dev Darshan Sud,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. A grievance is made by the petitioner that the learned trial Court has erred in allowing the application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the respondent who is the plaintiff before the learned trial Court. The Court, on a consideration of the material, held that the amendment sought would neither change the nature of the suit, retract any admission, is necessary for determining of the real controversy between the parties and would avoid multiplicity of the pleadings. This conclusion was reached by the Court below after a detailed appreciation of the pleadings of the parties. I do 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 not find that the Court has committed any error in exercising the jurisdiction calling for my interference in the order passed by the trial Court. This petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Any observation made in this petition shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the submission before the learned trial Court. All miscellaneous applications are disposed of. July 23, 2008. (Dev Darshan Sud) (aks) Judge.