IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR {CHHATTISGARH1 WRTT PETmON N0^'5>2—/2006. PETITIONER: ..••'.' ..••• \^-^>'"\.. '.••? ^••"' ..••'' ^•;;^x..••-" • /5-<^>/ ...••"A^y-'"' ^^T/ 5/0 Domara Prasad Sahu, Shudhe Ram Sahu, aged about 41 years, residence of village Chotmarra, Post Devarbija, Tahsil Saja, District Diirg, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS ^ \^', fspondents ^ > - \°^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The <•' Secretary School Education Departnient Minista-y D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director of School Education Office», -i D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The District Education Officer, Bemetara, "'' Through Block Development Officer, Saja, Durg, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI. PROHIBmON AND FOR THE OTHER SIMILAR WRIT OR WRITS. ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. XI-HC-22 7*\ 3^ •<||<<1<')<|, OTn^'ls, RfdlUy< 3ll^n Maqi TWCITaiww""""""""7"'wr 200 a'n^TW R-fi+sn^r StltlWflfer 3ii^i6«iiWBfer <oi<if<']<fl-f >iiiCTT^;te<fi'<Rit<ii< ^aif^rgn^T "^' Barve .Heard Sjpri O.P. Sahu, coun; Govt. Advocate for the State/responc The case of the petitioner is since 17-3-89 and as per the Instrucl M.P. the Assistant Teaciiers vhd examination on their own expenses increments and order of Government B. Ed. examination on his ov/n oos1 effeot is Annexure-P/5, but the' pj whereas, similarly situated persons under the orders of the Tribunal and Having heard learned couns^ and circumstances of the case, withcjut case, the petitioner is allowed to ma| of this petition raising all his gnevane days from today and in turn, respon; the petitioner in the light of avermen) in the representation also. If r similarly situated persons have t)( increments anct the petitioner's casj inorements on the basis of Governt- period of 3 months from today, in aa): Wlth the direction aforesaid. fie Parties are entitled for certifi^d .^1 for the petitioner and Shri Sumesh Bajaj, l^nts, on advance copy. that he is working as Assistant Teacher lons dated 24-12-98 issued by the State of have passed B.T.I., B.Ed. and M.Ed. bfter 22-10-64 are entitled for tvvo advance 1 is Annexure-P/1. The petitioner passed hte in the year 1994 and a certificate to tliat ^titioner has not been given the benefit pave been granted fr^o advance increments this Court vide Annexure-P/6. for the parties, having regard to the facts expressing any opinion ofthe merit ofthe ^e a detailed representation along with copy [es to respondent No,3 withln a penod of15 Uent No.3 is directed-to examine the case of made by the petitioner in this petition and No.3 reaches to the conclusion that ;en granted the benefit of hw advance is also covered for grant of bA/o advance ^nent's order, then to pass orders wiffiin a ;ordance with law. petition standsdteposed of. ofthisorder. Sdf- L.C. Bh»eloo judge •espc|ndent tie (^y^) y