1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 98 OF 2008 Anita Richard Kinny ...Petitioner Versus S.R.A. & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. Mukesh Pabari i/by M/s. V.S. Legal Associates for the petitioner Mr. J.J. Reddy for Respondent No.1 Mr. N.A. Shaikh for Respondent No. 2 Mr. Shekhar Ingole, Assistant Government Pleader, for Respondents No. 3 and 4. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and S.A. BOBDE, JJ. DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2008. P.C.:- The petitioner's case is that she had filed an appeal, as her case for grant of accommodation under the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme was not acceded to by the Appellate Authority, which has not decided the appeal for the last five years. In the meantime, the Government has issued a Resolution on 15th November, 2007, by which the powers to resolve all disputes have been conferred on a High Power Committee. The Committee is also authorised to decide the disputes with regard to 2 eligibility for rehabilitation. The petitioner seeks a direction that she be allotted permanent accommodation. 2. Since this matter can be considered by the High Power Committee, and it will not be possible for this Court to come to a conclusion whether the petitioner was eligible or not, therefore, after hearing the learned counsel for the respondents, we dispose of this petition at this stage, allowing the petitioner to make a representation before the Committee. If such an application is made, the Committee shall decide that application on merits expeditiously. 3. The petition is accordingly disposed of. All issues are kept open. BILAL NAZKI, J. S.A. BOBDE, J.