IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 4478 of 2009. Decided on: March 23,2010. Joginder Singh ….. Petitioner. Versus H.R.T.C. & Anr. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B.Misra, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. M.R. Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by the delay in sanctioning the pensionary benefits. During the pendency of the writ petition, the admitted benefits have been sanctioned. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are two grievances left; one is the interest of the belated payment and second is the recovery made from the benefits. These two aspects, petitioner may point out before the first respondent by filing appropriate representation. In the event of the representation as above being filed, the matter will be duly considered by the first respondent with notice to the petitioner and appropriate orders in accordance with law shall be passed in another three months. -2- With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 23, 2010. ( R.B. Misra ), (ks/vs) Judge.