- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.77 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.77 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.77 OF 2005 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.38 OF FROM ORDER NO.38 OF FROM ORDER NO.38 OF 2001 2001 2001 Devraj V. Borana ...Applicant vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and ors. ...Respondents CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : APRIL 15,2005. : APRIL 15,2005. : APRIL 15,2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. There is no compliance with direction given by this Court to the Respondent No.1 to file Affidavit. My attention has been invited to the order dated 24th January 2001 passed in the main Appeal. This Court directed the Respondent no.1 to take decision on the proposal for regularization made by the Appellant/Applicant within four months from 24th January 2001. 2. Shri Bhat states that till today no decision is taken by the Respondent No.1-Corporation on the proposal for regularization submitted by the Appellant/Applicant. 3. If the proposal for regularization dated 29th October 2001 filed by the Applicant is pending, the same shall be decided by the Respondent No.1-Corporation within three months from today. It is made clear that no further extension will be granted. 4. Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of the order. JUDGE. JUDGE. JUDGE.