IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 18TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 27TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 24680 of 2011(H) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- GIREESAN, T.C.36/796, LEKHA BHAVAN, PERUMTHANNI, VALLAKKADAVU P.O., TRIVANDRUM-09 BY ADV. SRI.AJITH KRISHNAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. CHIEF ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ROADS & BRIDGES, PUBLIC OFFICE, TRIVANDRUM - 695 033. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ROADS DIVISION, PMG, TRIVANDRUM-695 033. 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ROAD SUB DIVISION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. JOSEPH GEORGE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.24680/2011-H: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF MEASUREMENT BOOK SUBMITTED BY THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER TO THE R.4. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 08/06/2011 TO THE RESPONDENTS. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 24680 of 2011 H ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 18th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petitioner is a contractor, who undertook the work of D/W APDRP urgent restoration work due to laying of 11 KV U.G. cable by KSEB in Sreekaryam to Pothencode road KM 0/550 to 2/600. Pursuant to an agreement dated 30.01.2010, total bill amount is `2 lakhs which has not been paid to the petitioner. Ext.P1 is the copy of the measurement book concerning the work in question and Ext.P2 is the representation made by the petitioner before the third respondent, seeking payment of the amount due. Neither the representation has been considered nor the payment has been made. That led the petitioner to file this writ petition. 2. Since the matter is still pending consideration of the third respondent, it is for him to consider and pass orders on the claim of the petitioner, in the light of Ext.P1. W.P.(C) No.24680/2011 : 2 : This, the third respondent shall do, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition, and the amount due shall be paid without any further delay in the matter. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/18/11 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge