IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 514 OF 2006 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 515 OF 2006 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 516 OF 2006 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 517 OF 2006 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 518 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2155 OF 2006 Sunil Bharadkar & Ors. ... Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents Mr. M.M. Vashi for the petitioner. Mr. K.R. Belosey, AGP for respondent No. 1. Mrs. P.A. Purandhare for respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 22nd September, 2006 : 22nd September, 2006 : 22nd September, 2006 P.C. . The structure has been demolished. The petitioner has been allotted alternate premises by MMRDA. It is case of the petitioner that they are willing to have alternate accommodation from BMC instead of MMRDA. For that purpose, they have made application to BMC, which is pending and for that they ( 2 ) are approaching this Court. 2. If the representation is pending, BMC to dispose of the same according to law. 3. On behalf of Corporation, the learned Counsel makes statement that the land has already been handed over to MMRDA. 4. The motion disposed of accordingly. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]