Crl. R No. 1225 OF 2010 ****** Bhura Singh and another vs Ranjit Kaur & another Present : Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. U.S.Dhaliwal, Addl. A.G Punjab for respondent No.2. ******* This revision petition has been filed against the order dated 21.1.2010 passed by the learned Revisional Court whereby an application under Section 311 of the Cr.P.C (which was declined by the learned trial Court) has been allowed. Counsel for the petitioners has argued that prior to the moving of the instant application, the evidence of the prosecution had been closed. Further, the persons now sought to be summoned as witnesses were not mentioned in the challan. Counsel for the respondent has argued that the learned Revisional Court has observed in its order that the power of the Court under Section 311 of the Cr.P.C is extremely wide and a Court cannot be precluded from seeking any additional evidence which may be required for a just decision of the case. He has further argued that the said evidence has already been taken in the Court and even the statement of the accused- petitioner under Section 313 of the Cr.P.C has been recorded on 7.3.2011. Keeping in view the aforementioned facts, I find no reason to interfere in the impugned order. Consequently, this revision petition is dismissed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) March 09, 2011. JUDGE `kk'