IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5990 of 2010 PAPPU SINGH @ SHEKHAR SINGH son of Aditya Singh, resident of village Narhat, Police Station Narhat, District Nawadah, … …Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … OPPOSITE PARTY For the Petitioner: M/s Akhileshwar Pd. Singh And Raj Kumar, Advocates For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ----------- 2 23.04.2010 The petitioner files a supplementary affidavit. Let it be kept on the record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is in custody and seeks bail in a case registered under sections 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that allegedly 26 cartridges have been recovered from the joint house of the petitioner and other co-accused persons including his father co-accused Aditya Singh. It is further submitted that the petitioner and family members are also having licensed weapons. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 31.07.2009. Learned counsel for the State submitted that the petitioner has filed supplementary affidavit stating therein 2 that he is also accused in about 16 more cases. However, it is accepted that the father of the petitioner, who is also accused in about 24 cases, had already been granted bail in this case. That apart, co-accused Suman Singh and another accused had also been granted bail vide order, as contained in annexure A to the supplementary affidavit. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the abovenamed petitioner, PAPPU SINGH @ SHEKHAR SINGH, to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada , in Narhat Police Station Case No. 01/06 (G.R. No. 11/06) with further condition that one of the bailors must be close relative or family member of the petitioner, who is not an accused and shall state on affidavit before the court concerned, giving complete genealogy, as to how he or she is related with the petitioner. Further, after his release, if the petitioner is again found involved in similar kind of offences, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. The petitioner shall also remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial and if he fails to 3 remain present on two consecutive dates in course of trial without any reasonable cause shown by him, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)