W @ WW/Ibx BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH CGURT OF CHEATISHGARH AT BILASPUR g7§31 WP. Nu mos 4% m THE MATER OF -‘—————u——..__~ MUNICH’AL COmRA’HONWANDGAQN, 1 THROUGH ma commoNERMUMCEAL CORPQRAIIQN, ‘f DIST.RAJNANDGA0N(C.G) VERsus > PETITIDNERS an VIEW ' g— 1.3mm OF mmsam THRGUGH THE SECRETARY To THE (3mm, OF crammGARH, LABQUR DEMRTMENT, BKs WYA RAEUR (£16) 231E DEPUTY LABOUR COMAISSIONH, CHI-IA'I’I‘ISGARH, GETANJALI NAGAR RAEUR(C.G) % 3..PRESIDDIG OFECER, LABQUR COURT RAJNANDGAON, RAJNANDGAomaG) ¢.sm05HKtmmsm sxo smuNIrYANAND MISImA, mo SHANHNAGAxwmNOA WANDGAomce) W WRH' ETHION UNDER ARTICLE 2gluz/0F THE CONSTITUTION OF N}! OR ISSUANCE OF E NATUEE OF CERTIURARI TI§N AS MAY BE DEIIMED i 1 ‘ I A WRIT EV TH AR C FIT HEGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 3791 0f 2003 Pefitiormr Municipal Comoration Rajnandgaon Versus R€spondents Sta’m of Chhattisgal‘h 8n othErs {Writ Petition uxlder Amide 226 / 227 of the Coxlstitution of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shii Satish K. Agniho§i J.) 5111i Pradeep Saxena, Advocam for the petitioner. Shxi Yashwant Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the ' respondents No. 1 to 3. .Wgx Shri H. B. Agalwal, Senior Advocate with Ms 1m K’éhiMukhmjee, Advocate for the respondent No.4. O R D E R (oral; ( Passed on this 20th day of January, 2O 10 ) Heard. Learned counsel appeariiig for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the impugued order the reliefs have been grantecl. Accordingly, this writ petition has become infructuous 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents agree with the above submission made by leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner. In View of the foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. , / Sdl‘ 3 Satish K. Agmhotn \ ’ ‘. Sudge a x \ 7 \V Thakur