IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13041 of 2011 LAXMI YADAV S/O SWAMI NATH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 25.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of snatching of Rs. 5500/- on the pistol point. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was an auto rickshaw driver at Faridabad, whereas the occurrence alleged to have taken place at Muzaffarpur. It is further submitted that petitioner is on litigating term with one Mahant Siyaram Sharan, who set up the informant to lodge the frivolous case. A statement has been made in the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. The accusation reflects that the informant got acquainted with petitioner on the date of occurrence itself. It is also submitted that occurrence took place on 29.03.2010 when the F.I.R. was registered on 09.04.2010 which clouds the bonafide of the accusation. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released 2 on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 145 of 2010, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Indian Penal Code. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)