IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO :1003 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 01/04/2009 in WP NO : 24713 OF 2007 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 Union of India, Rep. by Secretary, Ministry for Health and Family Welfare, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi. 2 Directorate General of Health Services, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi. 3 Joint Secretary, Ministry for Health and Family Welfare, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi. 4 Director, Central Govt. Health Services, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi. 5 Additional Director Cental Govt. Health Services, Kendriya Swasthy Bhavan, Prakash Nagar, Begumpet, Hyderabad. 6 The Superintendent of Police, CID (Economic Offences Wing) Hyderabad. ..... APPELLANTS AND A.P. Nursing Home Association, Having its office at I.M.A. Hall, Koti, Hyderabad, Represented by its Secretary. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellants:C.VANI REDDY(SC FOR ADDL.CENTRAL GOVT) Counsel for the Respondent : KUM.K.SUJATHA The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No :1003 of 2009 ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) The Union of India filed the present writ appeal being aggrieved by the order dated 1.4.2009 of the learned single judge in W.P.M.P. No.32173 of 2007 & W.V.M.P. No. 2725 of 2008 in Writ Petition No.24713 of 2007, whereby and whereunder the learned single Judge, dismissed the vacate stay application filed by the Union of India. The respondent-writ petitioner filed the aforementioned writ petition before the learned single Judge seeking to declare the office memorandum dated 30.10.2007 issued by the appellants as arbitrary and illegal. A consequential direction was also sought to direct the appellants to restore the tariff prevalent since 2002. In the said writ petition, the respondent also filed W.P.M.P. No.32173 of 2007 seeking interim suspension of the office memorandum dated 30.102007 of the appellants, restoring the tariff prevalent since 2002. Through order dated 28.12.2007, a learned single Judge of this Court granted the interim suspension as prayed for. Subsequently, the department filed vacate application, being W.V.M.P. No. 2725 of 2008, before the learned single Judge seeking vacation of the said interim order. The learned single Judge, through the order impugned in this appeal, while making the interim order earlier granted absolute, dismissed the vacate stay application. Hence, the department filed the present appeal. Admittedly, the impugned order is only an interim order and the learned single Judge did not pass final any orders in the writ petition touching upon the merits of the matter. In view of the fact that the main writ petition filed by the respondent is still pending for adjudication before the learned single Judge, we feel it appropriate to post the writ petition itself for final hearing before the learned single Judge. Hence, the registry is directed to post Writ Petition No. 24713 of 2007 for final hearing before the learned single Judge on 10.8.2009 on the top of the list. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ T.MEENA KUMARI,J Date: 28th July, 2009 _________________ SANJAY KUMAR,J pnb