IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1176 of 2010 (O & M) Date of decision: 23.02.2010 Rajinder Bajwa @ Rajinder Dhillon ..Petitioner Versus Harpreet Singh ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present:- Mr.Swarn Sandhir, Advocate for the petitioner . . . AJAY TEWARI. J This petition has been filed against the order of the learned Executing Court dismissing the objections filed by the petitioner. Under the decree in question, the petitioner was to pay Rs.9 lacs. In her objections, she stated that the entire money had been paid out of the Court. Undisputedly, none of the payments were certified to the Court as required. Provisions of Order 21 Rule 2 the Executing Court took into account the fact that the payments to the tune of Rs.5,50,000/- were made by cheques and rejected the contention regarding the remaining Rs.3,50,000/- since no documentary evidence has been placed on the file in respect thereof, the learned Executing Court hold that it was hard to believe that the payment would be made without any receipt. In the circumstances, it cannot be said that the order rejecting the objections suffered from any material irregularity liable for intereference under Section 227 of the Constitution of India. The present petition stands dismissed. Since the present petition stands decided, the C.M., if any shall also stand disposed of accordingly. February 23, 2010 (AJAY TEWARI) Sukhpreet JUDGE