IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11909 of 2010 1. SURYA NARAYAN S/O RAM PRAVESH MANDAL R/O VILL.- RAMJANI, P.S. JANKINAGAR, DISTT.- PURNEA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY H.R.D., STATE OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, DOSHI DIVISION, SAHARSA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHEPURA 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION SUPERINTENDENT-CUM- DISTRICT PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION OFFICER MADHEPURA 5. THE PRINCIPAL, PRIMARY SCHOOL BITHALI AT BLOCK LALBAGH, DISTT.- MADHEPURA 6. THE AREA OFFICER, BANMAKHI GRAM PANCHAYAT LATRAHA, DISTT.- MADHEPURA ----------- 02. 24.03.2011 Annexure-7 is the speaking order which has been passed by the District Superintendent of Education cum District Coordinator, Madhepura. The speaking order has been passed on the direction of the High Court issued in CWJC No.963 of 2007. The finding given by the respondent is that the so-called teachers training degree having been obtained from what is known as Oxford College of Education and Sister Nivedita College of Training situated in West Bengal are not recognized institutions under the National Council of Teachers Education Act. Since the institution is not recognized, therefore, any degree obtained from such institute cannot be treated to be valid degree enabling the petitioner to become eligible for appointment as Panchayat Teacher under the State. Since the petitioner could not provide any evidence of such recognition either by NCTE or of the State of Bihar, either before the DSE or before this Court, there is some 2 difficulty in interfering with the conclusion reached by the DSE for after all the degree obtained by a candidate must be a valid and recognized piece of paper by the State under which employment is being sought by a candidate. The findings being what they are, this Court does not find any infirmity or illegality in the rationale for reaching the conclusion or finding that the petitioner not being eligible seems to be correct and in conformity with the rules in this regard. In view of the above, no interference is warranted with Annexure-7. The writ application is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)