IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 2521 of 2009 Date of decision: 02.02.2011 Smt. Harman Dhillon ...Petitioner Versus The Union of India and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Kanwajit Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Parampreet Singh Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Assistant Solicitor General of India with Mr. Vinay Arora, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3. RANJIT SINGH J. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner points out that the petitioner has already filed a complaint, which she was entitled to file as per the Brochure. He would also refer to the conditions providing that LOI is not to be issued during the pendency of complaint. The grievance of the counsel for the petitioner is that though complaint has not been answered but still the LOI has been issued to the respondents. Counsel, accordingly, submits that let the complaint of the petitioner be decided by affording her opportunity of hearing where she would be able to point out all the drawbacks/flaws in terms of the criteria provided and laid down in the Brochure. The present writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of at this stage, with the direction to the respondents to consider the Civil Writ Petition No. 2521 of 2009 -2- complaint filed by the petitioner in accordance with law and decide the same within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner would be intimated date and shall be afforded opportunity of hearing before deciding the complaint. February 02, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE