1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Writ Petition No. 932 of 2009 . Dr.Vaibhav G. Dhoka .. Petitioner v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Others ..Respondents Mr.Balasaheb Deshmukh, Adv. for the Petitioner. Mr.D.P.Adsule, APP for the State CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED : 13th November, 2009 P.C. : 1. We have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and we are satisfied that the petitioner has an equally efficacious and alternate remedy of filing a private complaint, more so, when in this case the Bombay Stock Exchange has by its letter dated 30.10.2004 informed the petitioner that his claim pertains to the Securities Lending Agreement which is outside the purview of the Exchange Mechanism. It is also on record that Kotak Securities Ltd. have informed the petitioner in writing that as his agreement with Mateo Consultants Pvt. Ltd. is not an agreement with the sub-broker, 2 agent or franchise. 2. Hence the petition is disposed by relegating the petitioner to the alternative remedy either before the Civil Court or before the Competent Judicial Magistrate, I Class at Pune, or the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, as the case may be. [R.Y.GANOO, J.] [B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.]