IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2009 / 28TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 31881 of 2008(U) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ RAZIYA, W/O.NAZARUDEEN, BISMILLA MANZIL, THEKKUPARA.P.O, AMBOORI VILLAGE, (PRESENTLY AT BISMILLA MANZIL, PANACHAMOODU.P.O, VELLARADA VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK). BY ADV. MR.POOVAPPALLY M.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- VELLARADA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL GRADE SECRETARY,VELLARADA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PANACHAMOODU.P.O, VELLARADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 505. BY ADV. MR.J.S.AJITHKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.31881/2008 U APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE LICENCE NO.186/05 DTD. 15/11/2006. P2: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.A2-879/07 DTD. 20/09/2008 OF THE SPECIAL GRADE SECRETARY OF VELLARADA GRAMA PANCHAYAT. P3: COPY OF THE RECEIPT DTD. 27/09/2008. P4: COPY OF THE APPEAL PETITION BEFORE THE PANCHAYAT DTD. 7/10/2008. P5: COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD DTD. 10/10/2008. P6: COPY OF THE PETITION DTD. 14/10/2008 FILED BEFORE THE RESPONDENT AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF RIGHTS TO INFORMATION ACT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: R1(A): COPY OF NOTICE DTD. 26/07/07 OF THIS RESPONDENT. R1(B): COPY OF LETTER OF MINISTER FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT. R1(C): COPY OF NOTICE OF THE RESPONDENT DTD. 5/08/08. R1(D): COPY OF RESOLUTION NO.III (3) DTD. 20/09/2008 OF THE PANCHAYATH COUNCIL. R1(E): COPY OF COMMUNICATION DTD.22/09/2008 OF THIS RESPONDENT. R1(F): COPY OF APPEAL NO.546/08 BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVT.INSTITUTIONS. R1(G): COPY OF COUNTER AFFIDAVIT OF THIS RESPONDENT DTD.3/11/2008 IN APPEAL NO.546/08. /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss V.GIRI, J. ----------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.31881 of 2008 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of June, 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges Ext.P2 order passed by the panchayat whereby the petitioner was restrained from operating the oil mill and flour mill in the property mentioned therein. 2. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the respondent that the petitioner had challenged Ext.P2 in an appeal before the Tribunal for Self-Government Institutions. The appeal itself has now been dismissed. In the result, without prejudice to the contentions of the petitioner, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- (V.GIRI) JUDGE sk/ //true copy//