^ '»Ka^3F" 9 .^ H1GH COURT OF CHHAn ISGARH AT BILASPUR ^ritPe<itiQn(S)Nu>,4332of20C« PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Dharamraj Singh Sahu S/o Late Shri Jhumuk Lal Sahu, aged bout 39 years, occupation Mansevi Teacher Govt. Hig. Sec. School Camp -1 Bhilai, District Durg (CG). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through The Secretary, Education Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Director, Public Instruction Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 3. The District Education Otficer, Distt. Durg (CG). 4. The Principal Govt. Hig. Sec. School Camp -1 Bhilai, Distt. Durg (CG). (WKtT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUfION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Asauhotri. J.) Present : Shri Vipin Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 8 day ofAugust, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has worked without appointment order since 1993. The petitioner was appointed as honorary Teacher, as is evident from the experience certificate issued by the Principal, Oovt. Higher Secondary School, Camp 1, Bhilai (Annexure P/3). 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner has shown a document dated 11.07.97 (Annexure P/2) which is in the nature of select list. The petitioner has not produced any documents to substantiate his argument that on the basis ofthe said select list, he was appointed as honorary Teacher. On the basis of the said select list, the petitioner cannot claim any right to the post. ^ 2 3. It is also not clear as to whether the petitioner was ever appointed or not, exeept the self same statement. Further, tfae statement of the petitioner that he has been removed by the oral order can also be not examined in absence of any order. This petition cannot be decided for want ofadequate materials. 4. The prayer of the petitioner seeking difection to the respondents to appoint the petitioner in vacant post cannot be granted, as no writ or direction can be issued directmg the respondents/State to appoint any person on a vacant post without going through proper selection or without following the mles. 5. The petitioner has worked as honorary Teacher, without any appointment order, thus, he has no right to the post or continuation. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. Sahu Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge