IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19340 of 2009 1. PRATIMA KUMARI 2. RAGHU KUMAR @ RAGHU KUMAR SINGH ------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 10.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that killing is shown due to non-fulfilment of demand of Rs. 50,000/- for purchase of Taxi for livelihood of husband but marriage was of the year 1998. Petitioners being the younger members of family as brother and sister having no concern with the demand nor with the Taxi nor any material appeared in course of investigation against these petitioners save and except suspicion cast in the FIR even then they are apprehending their arrest. I agree with the submission. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named two petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- - 2 - divisional Judicial Magistrate, (West), Muzaffarpur in Kanti (Panapur O.P.) P.S.Case no. 163/06 (G.R.No. 1210/06), subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI