1 srk wp-L-2341-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO. 2341 OF 2010 Hajarabi Shaikh and others. ... Petitioners Versus Slum Rehabilitation Authority and others. ... Respondents Mr. Nilesh V.B. Pawaskar with Ms. Komal M. Dhanuka for the petitioners. Mr. V.D. Patil for respondent No.1. Mr. Milind More, Assistant Government Pleader for State. Mr. Vaibhav Sudgare with Mr. Sanjay Garud i/by M/s. Khaitan & Jayakar for respondent No.2. CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. Friday, October 22, 2010 P .C. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 states that petitioner Nos. 1 to 5, 8,9 and 11 are eligible for allotment of permanent accommodation and as their names are in Annexure- 2, they will be granted transit accommodation or rent in lieu of transit accommodation. As far as petitioner No.7 is concerned, since she is wife of respondent No.8, she will also shift to the transit accommodation to be allotted to petitioner No.8 and that the learned counsel for the petitioners agrees that petitioner No.7 will shift to transit accommodation to be allotted to petitioner No.8. 2. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 states that as far as petitioner Nos.6, 10 and 12 are concerned, they are not eligible for allotment of any permanent or transit accommodation and that, if at all, they are occupying 2 srk wp-L-2341-10.sxw any structures, their structures will not be demolished without following the due process of law. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that petitioner Nos.1 to 5, 7 (with petitioner No.8), 9 and 11 will shift to the transit accommodation within three weeks from today. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 states that shifting charges will be paid to the petitioners to shift within the time limit. 4. In view of the above statement, nothing survives in the petition and the same is disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.