IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.270 of 2011 MAHADEO PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 13.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the Panchayat Mukhiya is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of demand of Rs. 2000/- from each beneficiary for allotment of ‘Indira Awas Scheme’. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that during investigation it has come that the petitioner wanted the ‘Indira Awas Scheme’ sanctioned on the land of one Raj Kumar Mahato since he has no land which was refused by the petitioner. Hence, maliciously this case has been lodged by the informant. The aforesaid contention of the petitioner has not been controverted by the learned counsel for the State. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on 2 bail on deposit of Rs. 15,000/- by the petitioner before the learned court below which will be invested in some fixed deposit scheme which will be result of the case in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Samastipur (M)P.S. Case No.73 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Samastipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)