IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2010 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 37022 of 2010(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- DINESH.K.N, S/O. V. NARAYANAN, AGED 23 YEARS, AMBADY HOUSE, ATTYVELLIL LANE, PERUMBADAPPU, COCHIN -6. BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM MATHEW (VETTOOR) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. MAHATHMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA.P.O, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, MAHATHMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA.P.O, KOTTAYAM. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC FOR UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 37022 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 13th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is undergoing two year MBA Course. When the results of the 1st semester examination was declared, he had failed in the one paper, viz., “Accounting for Managers”. He applied for scrutiny and revaluation as per Exts.P3 and P1 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the scrutiny and revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the scrutiny of the answer paper within two weeks and the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for scrutiny and revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp