IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15117 of 2008 Between: Chadalavada Jalaiah S/o. Hanumanth Rao Pedakakani, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Sri. Bramaramba Malleswara Swamy Temple, Pedakakani, Guntur District, rep. by its Executive Officer. 2 The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Tilak Road, Hyderabad 3 Potturi Laxminarayana Varaprasad S/o. Murtyunjaya Sharma Pedakakani, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of 'Mandamus' declaring the action of the Official respondents in not drawing up the seniority list in the cadre of Archakas and effecting promotions to the post of Mukhya Archaka Without there being seniority list as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Rules and consequently direct the Official respondents to prepare seniority list before effecting promotions to the cadre of Mukhya Archaka and also declare that the petitioner is senior to the 3rd respondent in the cadre of Archaka in view of the passing of the Archaka test in the month of December 1988 and also view of the proceeding of the 2nd respondent dated 10.11.1983 and the petitioner is entitled to be promoted as Mukhya Archaka in the existing vacancy in preference to the 3rd respondent and consequently direct the official respondents to promote the petitioner as Mukhya Archaka in the 1st respondent's temple with all consequential benefits in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.RATNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: V.T.M.PRASAD,SC FOR ENDOWNMENTS The Court made the following ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to pursue his remedies. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:18.07.2008 kdl ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KSRANI}