-:1:- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1851 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.1851 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.1851 OF 2008 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL(ST.) NO.13805 OF 2001 APPEAL(ST.) NO.13805 OF 2001 APPEAL(ST.) NO.13805 OF 2001 The State of Maharashtra. ... Applicant. V/s. Gulab Maruti Kuspe (Deceased) through Legal Heirs 2. Jaysingh Gulab Kuspe & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. S.N. Gavade for the Applicant. Mr. , for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : R.M. SAVANT, J. : R.M. SAVANT, J. : R.M. SAVANT, J. DATE DATE DATE : 27TH AUGUST, 2008. : 27TH AUGUST, 2008. : 27TH AUGUST, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . By the above Civil Application, the Applicant prays for bringing the heirs of the sole Respondent Gulab Maruti Kuspe on record. Out of the said heirs, Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have been served. As regards Respondent No. 1, the Bailiff’s remark is that the notice has been affixed on door. Respondent No.4 is the wife of the sole Respondent, who is also dead and whose heirs are Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. 2. Since Respondent No.1 has been served by affixing and since Respondent Nos.2 and 3 who are the other heirs of the said Gulab Kuspe are already served, the hearing of the above Civil Application need not be postponed. -:2:- 3. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b), (c) and (d). 4. The Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. SAVANT,J.) SAVANT,J.) SAVANT,J.)