20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELmj AT NEW DELID + CRL.M.C. 1317/2011 N.IEHAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr. KanV;ar Singh, Advocate versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. M*j Ohri, APP for the State . . - CORAM: . · HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKT A ,qUPTA ORDE1R 0/o 20.09.2011 Respondent No.2 has been served. Sheistates that the matter has been settled between the parties and she does ndt want to pursue the FIR in question. Be that as it may. The present is a for quashing of FIR. under Section 376/354/324 IPC. In view of the s¢rious allegations for offences under Section 376 IPC even if the parties settled the matter, this Court is not inclined to quash the FIR. The petition is dismissed. SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 'dk' fMvKTA GUPTA,J Signing Date:27.08.2024 16:57:17 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified