IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR '•'W.P.N6.^,i:'^l1;.(,.8t/2004^ PETITIONER / Damrudhar S/o MQhan'Sai, Aged Ahout 52 years, Caste - Ganda, .Qccupatkin - Kotwar, VUlage -Dhourabhata, Tahsil- Dabhra, Distt.- Janjgir —Ghampa .(C.G.).,.;- : ' • ; :• :^ VERSUS RESPMTOM^^ t-^^\StateofChhattisgarh Through- ^)$. Secrefary Revenue Department /^.^ ^•^'•" D.K.S.Bhawsin, RaipurfC.G.) >^^^^^ 2 Bpard of Revehue, Chhattisgarh ?;^;'^^.^ 'Bilaspur.:|:'. • ' ..-/^:^y":: '.:'::1:'.. •'•-:'-^ ^<^^-- 3. S.D.O.Tahsil-Dabhra, Distt. -Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) /^ •^ 4. Naib Tahsiklar, .Tahsil — Dabhra , Distt. - Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) c^^ i*-^ 5. Samru S/o Dewar Singh rawaut VUlage — Dhourabhata Tahsil - Dabhra Distt. - Janjgir (C.G.) WMT PETmON UNDER ARTieLE OF THE CONSTITOTIONOFINDIA. i^iif'ras-14-:1* «lifl; HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. V. i Petitioner Respondents WRIT PETITION N0.1118 OF Damrudhar versus State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Noneappearsforthepetitioner. Mr. A.S. Kachhawaha, Govemment Advocate for respondents No.1,3 and 4. None appears for other respondents. ith ORDER (Passed on 11'" Day of December, 2006) "a The matter was cailed for hearing twice. On both the occasions, none appeared nor any representation was made on behaff of the petitioner. 2. In the cireumstance, the writ petition is dismissed forwant of prosecution. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judgc Gopa|