* 1 * WP-2637/2005 23.9.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2637 OF 2005 Shri. Bajirao Vitthalrao Garje (Patil) .....Petitioner V/S. Shri. Baburao Laxman Vitthalrao Garje (Patil) and Ors. .........Respondents * * * * * * Mr. Prasad Kulkarni h/f. Mr. P.S. Dani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.S. Gokhale, Advocate for respondents no.1, 2, 3A to 3D. Mr. R.M. Pethe, Advocate for respondents no.4, 12A to 12F, 13 and 14. Coram : Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. 23 September, 2010. P.C. : 1. The learned counsel for respondents no.1, 2, 3A to 3D and respondents no.4, 12A to 12F, 13 and 14 state that they have no objection if the Writ Petition is allowed and the orders impugned therein set aside. Service of notice upon the other respondents has * 2 * WP-2637/2005 23.9.2010 already been dispensed with. In the circumstances, the rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). The application filed by the petitioner at Exhibit-140 before the trial court is dismissed as infructuous since that application is for review of the order dated 16th July 2004 which has now been set aside. No order as to costs. 2. The parties to appear before the trial court on 11th October, 2010 for hearing of the application at Exhibit-137. The trial court to decide the application afresh after hearing the petitioners. [Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J]