IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.407 of 2009 SIYARAM PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02/ 01-07-2009 Heard Mr. Kameshwar Prasad Sinha for the petitioner and Mr. Harendra Prasad Singh, learned Government Advocate No. 6 for respondent nos. 1 to 6. The writ petitioner seeks a direction to respondent no. 8 to produce Smt. Renu Devi who is allegedly his daughter-in-law. According to the writ petition, Smt. Renu Devi is married to the petitioner’s son (Sheo Shankar Prasad). She has been abducted by respondent no. 7, her father and respondent no. 8, who is the dewar of the elder daughter of respondent no. 7. Hence this writ petition for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus. It appears to us on a perusal of the materials on record that both the parties have lodged first information reports against each other. Let the same be investigated in accordance with law. We are not inclined to interfere in the present matter. The writ petition is dismissed. S.Sb/- (S.K. Katriar, J.) (Jyoti Saran, J.)