IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 873 OF 2009 (MS) Ghora Chalak Sewa Samiti & another. .....Petitioners Versus State and others. .....Respondents. Mr. Syed Nadim Khurshid, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand/ respondent no. 1 and 2. Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate for respondent no. 3 and 4. 29th June, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. The petitioners have amended and limited their prayer in the writ petition, which is as follows: “A. issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents No. 3 and 4 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 16.06.2008. B. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to construct the remaining 77-horse shed at Bara Patthar: C. Issue any suitable order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. D. Award the cost of the writ petition to the petitioners.” Petitioners pray that a booking office be given to them at a suitable place so that they may carry on their business. It has been pointed out by Mr. D.S. Patni, learned counsel for the Nagar Palika Parishad that in earlier writ petitions, such prayers have already been dismissed, moreover such a representation is pending before the Nagar Palika Parishad, Nainital. On the basis of the above statement, writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the Nagar Palika Parishad / respondent no. 3 and 4 shall dispose of the representation of the petitioners (contained as Annexure No. 6 to the writ petition) within a period of four weeks from today. Respondent no. 3 and 4 shall also take a decision on the issue of giving a booking window to the petitioners at suitable place. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 29.6.2009 Rathour