IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 29TH JANUARY 2010 / 9TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 1739 of 2010(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. KALLIANI KUTTY, OTHAYOTH VEETTIL HOUSE, D/O.PARVATHI AMMA, PARIYARAM, MUKKUNNU POST, THALIPARAMBA, KANNUR. 2. RAJESH KUMAR, S/O.KALLIANI KUTTY, OTHAYOTH VEETTIL HOUSE, PARIYARAM, MUKKUNNU POST, THALIPARAMBA, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT SRI.K.N.ABHILASH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE, KANNUR. 2. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (GENERAL), COLLECTORATE, KANNUR. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, K.S.E.B., ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, THALIPARAMBA, KANNUR. 4. JAYARAJAN, OTHAYOTH VEETTIL HOUSE, D/O.PADMAVATHI AMMA, PARIYARAM, MUKKUNNU POST, THALIPARAMBA, KANNUR. ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B FOR R3 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ----------------------------------------------- WP(C) No. 1739 of 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated, this the 29th day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner is against the attempt to draw electric line through the property of the petitioner, contrary to the actual facts, figures and relevant provisions of law, also ignoring the proceedings pending consideration before the Munsiff's Court, Thaliparamba, in O.S.370/2009. 2. When the matter had come up for consideration before this Court on 19.01.2010, 'status quo' as on date was ordered. 3. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent submits that the matter which was pending consideration before the first respondent has already been finalized and the order passed by the first respondent has been forwarded to the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner might be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to challenge the order stated as passed by the first respondent and so as to enable to pursue such exercise, the position as on date might be ordered to be continued for a reasonable period. 3. After hearing both the sides, including the learned standing WP(C) No.1739/2010 2 counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent, permission sought for is granted and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn; however making it clear that 'status quo' ordered by this Court on 19.01.2010 will continue for a further period of two weeks. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE dnc