IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.4499 OF 2008 Gopal Rameshwar Oza & anr. ]PETITIONERS. VERSUS 1 The State of Maharashtra ]RESPONDENTS. & others. ----- Mr.A.S.Barlota, Advocate,for the petitioners. Mr.U.K.Patil, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.V.D.Sonwane, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ----- Coram : Naresh H. Patil and N.D.Deshpande, JJ. Date : 19th June, 2009. PER COURT : Reply is filed on behalf of respondent State. The learned counsel Shri.Sonawane, appearing on behalf of respondent No.3 Municipal Corporation, states that the subject-property has been reserved in the Development Plan in the year 2001 itself and the petition is premature. 2 The learned counsel Shri.Barlota for the petitioner,on the basis of reply filed and on the basis of the statement made by learned counsel Shri.Sonawane, seeks withdrawal of petition with liberty to agitate his grievance in case cause of action arises in future. 3 Leave to withdraw the petition is granted. - 2 - In future in case cause of action arises, the petitioner is entitled to agitate the same. 4 Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. [ N.D.Deshpande,J.] [ Naresh H. Patil,J.] pcr/o/wp4499.08