IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16420 of 2008 1.SUMITRA DEVI wife of Sri Arun Pandey 2.Rimjhim Kumari daughter of Sri Arun Pandey Both residents of village-Katauna, P.S.-Barhat (Malaypur). Dist.-Jamui ….. …..Petitioners Versus 1.STATE OF BIHAR 2.Sri Krishna Deo Pandey son of Sri Akhileshwar Pandey, resident of village-Katauna, P.S.-Barhat (Malaypur), Dist.-Jamui ….. ….Opp.Parties. ----------- 3. 30.6.2010. No one appears on behalf of the petitioners either to press this petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. Two petitioners, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this court under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have prayed for quashing of the order dated 1.10.2007 passed in Barhat P.S. Case No.101 of 2007 by Sri A.K.Karim, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Jamui. By the said order the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offences under sections 341, 323, 504, 447, 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code. I have perused the materials available on the record and the first information report, which is annexure-1 to the petition. It is true that the petitioners are lady but in view of the facts and circumstances as mentioned in the first information report as well as in the impugned order whereby the learned Magistrate after perusing the charge sheet, case diary and the record had passed the impugned order, I am of the view that it is not a fit case to exercise inherent jurisdiction in favour of the petitioners. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)