IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 201 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 163 OF 2005 ROHIDAS DATTA FAL DESSAI ....Applicant Versus SHERIFIN BI SHAIKH GAFAR AND 5 ....Respondents ORS., None for the appellant/applicant. Mr. Sudesh Usgaonkar, Advocate for the legal heirs of respondent no.5. Coram:- J. N. PATEL, J. Date:- 8th November, 2006 P.C. Learned Counsel for the legal heirs of respondent no.5 states that the parties have already withdrawn the amount as determinined by the Reference Court prior to receiving the Writ of the Court. He further informs that one of the legal representatives, respondent no.5(h) has also expired. The learned Counsel should give due notice of the fact to the learned Counsel of the appellant so that he can take necessary steps to bring the legal representatives of respondent no.5(h) on record if any. In view of the fact, that the compensation is already withdrawn, the Civil Application no.201/2005 is dismissed as infructuous. J. N. PATEL, J. ef.