1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Writ Petition No.5706 of 2007 [P.P. Tirpude Vs. Divl. Commr. & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. S.A. Hirekhan, Advocate for the petitioner. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 06th December,2007. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner has challenged the Judgment of the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur, confirming the Judgment of the Additional Collector, Gondia. The Vote of No Confidence was passed against the petitioner. 3. The grounds of challenge, now raised before this Court during oral submissions, are that:- [a] the format of notice was not proper and even the name of Panchayat was not written on it; [b] in spite of demand by the petitioner, the vote by secret 2 ballot was not taken; [c] no opportunity to speak in the meeting was given; [d] no discussion on the subject was held, and [e] the notices were not served in the manner required by law. 4. Though very crucial submissions are made, the petitioner has not been able to demonstrate as to how any amongst the deficiencies indicated above has actually crept in. No evidence, whatsoever, is placed on record. The ingenuity shown during submissions is hollow and without foundation. 5. Petition does not call for interference, and is dismissed. Judge |Hedau|