IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.18962 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: November 30, 2006 M/s A One Builders ….Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and another …. Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA PRESENT: Shri Vinod Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). Notice of motion to the respondents. On the asking of Court, Shri Sukhdip Singh Brar, Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Copies of the writ petition have been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of directions to the respondents to make payment for the work, which according to the petitioner, has already been completed. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the averments made in the present petition, we find that a legal notice dated August 20,2006 (Annexure P.5) has been issued by the petitioner which remains unresponded so far. In this view of the matter, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, we dispose of the present petition CWP NO.18962 of 2006 -2- with a direction to the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana, respondent No.2 to take a final decision on the aforesaid legal notice (Annexure P.5) within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is received, by passing a detailed and speaking order and by taking such further action, as may be required, in accordance with law. A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. (Viney Mittal) Judge November 30, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla) KD Judge