1 S.B.Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.2676/2007 (Manvinder Kaur alias Simi vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : July 06, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.M.K.Garg, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. for the State. Mr.H.S.Sandhu, for the complainant. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by counsel appearing for the complainant. Perused the order impugned as well as the case diary and the statement of the prosecutrix. There are serious allegations against the present petitioner that she induced the prosecutrix to go with co-accused Jassi and, thereafter it is alleged that Jassi and others committed rape on the prosecutrix. Not only the matter end here but subsequently it is alleged that the petitioner directed the prosecutrix on telephone on 13.3.2007 to go with Jassi, which the prosecutrix declined, thereupon the petitioner stated that she had C.D., which was prepared at the time of rape on 2 her and thus, the allegation against the present petitioner is blackmailing the victim of the rape. In the circumstances, therefore, in my view, it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The bail application filed by the petitioner under section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-