IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.32386-M of 2009 Date of Decision:13.7.2010 Gurnam Singh and another .... Petitioners Versus Union of India .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Pavit Singh Mattewal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. D.D. Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. The present petitioners are seeking regular bail in case originating from Criminal Complaint No.SC No.106 dated 13.8.2009/17.8.2009 filed under Sections 9-A,25A & 60 of the NDPS Act. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent has stated at the bar that prosecution shall conclude its entire evidence within 6 months. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition at this stage. Ordered accordingly. 13.7.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE