IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2011 / 12TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21125 of 2011(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- THRESSIA M.L., LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, KARUNA U.P.SCHOOL, THENNILAPURAM, RESIDING AT CHITTILAPALLY HOUSE, KOZHUKKULLY P.O., THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD. 3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD. 4. THE MANAGER, KARUNA U.P.SCHOOL, THENNILAPURAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 5. GOKUL NAIR, LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, KARUNA U.P.SCHOOL, THENNILAPURAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI V.VIJULAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 21125 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 14.12.2010 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DATED 01/03/2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 16.02.2011 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXTS: NIL \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.21125/2011-M ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order passed by the District Educational Officer, the petitioner has filed Ext.P2 stated as a revision petition. It is prayed that the same may be directed to be disposed of within a time frame. 2. The petitioner was appointed as a Lower Primary Schoo1 Assistant on 08/05/1997. It is pointed out that one Shri Gokul Nair, who is the fifth respondent herein was also appointed as L.P.S.A in the said schoo1 on 23/01/2002. It is further pointed out that by treating him as an Upper Primary Schoo1 Assistant, the District Educational Officer has directed his retention, which is not justified. 3. I am not expressing anything on the merits of the claim. It is upto the Government to take a decision on Ext.P2. Therefore, there will be a direction to the Government to take a decision on Ext.P2 after hearing the petitioner and respondent W.P.(C). No.21125/2011 -:2:- Nos.4 and 5 within four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. The petitioner will forward a copy of the writ petition along with a certified copy of the Judgment to the first respondent for compliance. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms