IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No. 31699-CII of 2010 and Civil Revision No. 7571 of 2010 Date of decision: January 14, 2011 Som Pal .. Petitioner Vs. Sham Lal and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Nilesh Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate for the respondents. Mr. Rajiv Malhotra, Addl. A.G. Haryana. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 27.9.2010 (Annexure P3) passed by the trial court closing the evidence of the plaintiff without considering the application dated 20.9.2010 moved by him. Having examined the impugned order, though the petitioner has been granted sufficient opportunities to conclude the evidence, yet, in the interest of justice, some time could be granted to him to conclude the evidence subject to payment of costs. In view of the above, this petition is allowed and the petitioner the directed to conclude his evidence within three months from the date of receipt of copy of the order subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- as costs. January 14, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge