1 caf2933.10 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2933 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.389 OF 2010 Shri Gururaj N. Joshi. ....Applicant. Vs. Shri Milind A. Mangrulkar & ors. ....Respondents Mr.Ajit Savagave i/b. S.S.Patwardhan for applicant. Ms. Anjali Uthalekar i/b. S.S.Kulkarni for Respondent No.2 and 3. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED:- AUGUST 4, 2010 P.C. 1. For the reasons mentioned in the application, in the interest of justice, relief as claimed deserves to be granted. It is intriguing that although the Respondent No.2 wife is represented through Counsel, the Respondent No.1 husband has chosen to avoid service of the notice. Postal address of the Respondent No.2 and Respondent No.1 is same. Be that as it may, we find substance in the circumstances pointed out in the application under consideration. We allow the application in terms of prayer clause (a). Applicant 2 caf2933.10 is permitted to effect substituted service on Respondent No.1 by publication of notice in two local newspapers such as Sakal(English Edition) and Prabhat(Marathi Edition) having wide circulation in Pune and file affidavit of service within four weeks from today, failing which, Office to proceed on the basis that the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court. (A.A.SAYED, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)