IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 27555 of 1997 Between: Blooms College of Computers and Electronics rep.by its Hon.Correspondent Sri I.Ramachandra Reddy ..... PETITIONER AND 1. Union of India, Rep. By its Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, New Delhi 2. All India Council for Technical Education, Rep.by its Member Secretary, New Delhi (Dismissed for default as per Court order dt 24.08.2000 as against R.1 and R.2 3. The Regional Officer, Southern Regional Office, AicTE, Sastry Bhavan, Nungambakkam,Chennai. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or a writ particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in issuing the letter of viability dated 30.09.1997 imposing further conditions as arbitrary and illegal and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to accord recognition/approval to the petitioner institution. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. A.Narasimha reddy Counsel for the Respondents 1 and 2: dismissed for default Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Mr S.S.Prasad The Court made the following: ORDER: The petitioner filed this writ petition praying for the following relief: To issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in issuing the letter of viability dated 30.09.1997 imposing further conditions as arbitrary and illegal and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to accord recognition/approval to the petitioner institution. None appears for the petitioner as well as the respondents. By lapse of time, the cause in this Writ Petition has become infructuous as the petitioner questions the viability of the impugned letter with respect to affiliation for M.C.A course for the academic year 1997-98. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ____________ 30-03-2005 kvrm TO 1. The Secretary, Union of India, Human Resources Development Department, New Delhi 2. The Member Secretary, All India Council for Technical Education, New Delhi 3. The Regional Officer, Southern Regional Office, AicTE, Sastry Bhavan, Nungambakkam,Chennai. 4. 2 CD copies.