IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 7803 of 2009 Between: Dayakar Reddy, S/o. Narayana Reddy, Peerzadiguda Gram Panchayat and Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, R.R. District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of A.P. Rep by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Admn. Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, R.R. District, At Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 3 The District Panchayat Officer, R.R. District. 4 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Gachibowli, Hyderabad. 5 The Station House Officer, Uppal P.S. R.R. District. 6 M/s. ARCA Education Society, Rep by its Secretary/ Correspondent, F.No. 308 Reliance Residency, Opp : N.T.R. Stadium Indira Park Road, Hyderabad - 500 029. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in not taking any steps to stop the illegal and unauthorized construction being made by the 6th respondent in the land situated in Sy.No. 8 and 9 of Peerzadiguda Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, R.R. District, without obtaining requisite permission from the Gram Panchayat pursuant to the represenation dt. 25-3-2009 submitted by the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and consequently direct the respondent authorities to forthwith take appropriate action pursuant to the representation dt. 25-3- 2009, and to grant Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.PALLENAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no lis to be adjudicated in this writ petition and the matter has become infructuous. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 10th June, 2009 bcj