THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD W.P. Nos. 23321 and 23322 of 2011 COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana) Heard the counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners claim to have obtained housing loans from the 1st respondent bank. It is their grievance that though they are ready and willing to clear off the dues and close their respective loan accounts, the 1st respondent bank is not accepting their proposal and on the other hand it has filed O.A. No. 159 of 2011 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, in connection with the loan account of the petitioners in W.P. No. 23321 of 2011 and obtained a conditional order of attachment of the property of the 2nd petitioner in W.P. No. 23322 of 2011, by showing her as guarantor, on 20.07.2011, though she is not a guarantor for the loan obtained by the petitioners in W.P. No. 23321 of 2011. The question whether the 2nd petitioner in W.P. No. 23322 of 2011 stood as a guarantor for the loan obtained by the petitioners in W.P. No.23321 of 2001, cannot be decided by this Court in the present writ petitions. Admittedly, the petitioners in both the writ petitions have availed housing loans. It is their case that they are ready and willing to clear off the dues and close their respective loan accounts with the 1st respondent bank, but the 1st respondent bank is not accepting their proposal. If that is so, they can take such a plea before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, where the O.A. filed by the 1st respondent bank is pending, and seek necessary directions to the 1st respondent in the matter, and no relief much less the relief sought by the petitioners can be granted by this Court. The writ petitions are accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. _____________ N.V. RAMANA, J _________________ P. DURGA PRASAD, J 18th August 2011 IBL