IN THE HIGH COURT C? A4TAzA AT bArL0RE tTED THIS THE 4TH JUNE 0? 1998 P RESENT THE HON’BLE MR. R.P,saTlu, GRIE? JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K,R.eRASAD RAG WRIT PETITION NO.21565/1991 BETWsEN:— 1, Mrs,Jayamma, W/o 1te enchappa, D,No, 833—1, VI Cross, VIII Main, R.P, C. Layout, bangalore—56O 040, 2, Mrs, A,Uirijamma, W/o Sri Ewa Achar D,No, 518/K VIII Main, R,P,C,Layout, bangalore 560 040 3, MrsqLakshxni, W/o ri s3,s,Mayanna, DJo,518, IX Main, Rep ‘,Lay ut, Bangalore—560 040, 4, Mfl, D,M,hakuntha1 w/o Sri Ramaish, 1st Main Rod II Stage, bang1ore—560 040, 5, Mrs,Lakshmi, N,i106, X Main, n,p, C, Layout, bangaiore—560 40, , TITI0NERs (By 5ri k,s4zopa1 Hegde, dvoe te) 9 a,, C AND:— 1, The Bangalore Development Authority by itg commi ssioner, sumara Part west, anga1ore—560 020, 2,The State of Karnataka by its secretry, Deoartaent of Urban Deelbpment a Housing M, 8, Buil ding, Bangalore—560 001, RESPONDEnTS (by Sri U,Narana o, for RI and Sri A,V,3rlnivasa Reddy, for R2, ) This w,p, filed 4/a 225 a 227 of the Con 5 ti— tation of India praying to Call for records vide AnnexureD dt,10,5,91 and quash the same and etc, Thi 5 writ Petition coming on for preliminary hearing, this day, C,J,, made the following:— ORDER Learned cou sd appearing for the oetitioners submits that with the passage of time, the netition na, become nt uctuous, Tne resoondent nad n gven effect to Notificatino AnnexD 2 The petition is c o dingly d sm as d as J having become infructuous, The dismissal of this 3— writ oetition would not prevent the petitioners or any other persons havinq recourse to law if trie resoondentr resort to take action for the construction of ternole inside the oark, /L) —4 ‘ N:;1 kp/S698