Crl. Revision No. 1638 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Revision No. 1638 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 18.08.2011 Bimla ....Petitioner Vs. Kanwar and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present:- None for the petitioner. ***** A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) Assailed in this petition is the order dated 07.09.2009 passed by the Sessions Judge, Faridkot, allowing the revision preferred by the respondents against the summoning order dated 01.04.2008 passed by the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridkot. Perusal of the impugned order reveals that the trial Court had issued the process against the respondents to face trial under Sections 307, 341, 323, 354, 506 and 120-B IPC. However, the Sessions Judge, Faridkot, vide order dated 07.09.2009, accepted the revision petition and quashed the summoning order, while observing that earlier the Magistrate had already accepted the cancellation report and there are no sufficient grounds to summon the accused. Having scrutinized both the orders, it appears that the Crl. Revision No. 1638 of 2010 (O&M) 2 view taken by the Appellate Court is quite correct and the same does not warrant any interference by this Court. Dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) 18th of August, 2011 JUDGE ajp