1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.244 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.15 OF 2010 Ms. Alka H. Sarate ...Petitioner. v. Shri Dhanyakumar A. Bhumakar & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.V.M.Thorat i/by Dinesh W. Bhosale, advs. For the Petitioner. Mr.I.M.Khairadi, adv. For the Respondent Nos.1 to 4. Shri A.I.I.Patel, AGP for the Respondent Nos.5 and 6. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : APRIL 29, 2010 P.C. 1 There was interim order dated 17.8.2005 passed by the School Tribunal to stay the termination order dated 8.8.2005 with the direction to allow the petitioner to work on her original post and to pay as before. That order was confirmed even by this Court, in the writ petition which is still pending. The learned counsel for the Petitioner contends that she has not been reinstated nor she has been paid her salary. It appears that there is a controversy as to whether she was working on regular basis as Assistant Teacher or she was working on clock-hour basis before the termination order. According to the learned counsel for the respondents she was working on the clock hour basis and 2 she was directed to do so by the letter dated 9.4.2008 but she has not resumed that work so far. He also made a statement that even if now she wants to join on clock-hour basis, she would be allowed to resume the duty. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that she will resume the duty on clock-hour basis on Monday, 3rd May, 2010. 2 At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was working in the regular scale in the academic course while the learned counsel for the management points out that she was working as English teacher for 11th and 12th class in M.C.V.C. in the junior college and even in the pleadings of the petitioner in Appeal No. 152/05 before the School Tribunal, it is indicated that she was working with M.C.V.C. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner disputes it. 3 In view of the above, if the petitioner so desires, she may join the duty as English teacher for 11th and 12th standard in junior college M.C.V.C. run by the management on clock-hour basis from 3rd May, 2010. However, if she has some other claim and is unable to join that duty, she may seek clarification from the writ Court before whom the writ petition is pending. In view of the above, no further direction is appeared to be necessary in the present contempt petition. 3 4 Contempt Petition stands disposed off accordingly. As the contempt petition itself is disposed off, civil application does not survive and stands disposed off accordingly. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)