1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 5346 of 2005 (M/s Raymonds Ltd. Sausar .vs. Union of India & 2 Ors.) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and Mrs. Vasanti A. Naik, JJ. DATE : January 31, 2008. Heard Mr.Upadhyay, Adv. for the Petitioner, Mr.F.T.Mirza, Adv. for the Respondent No.1 and Mr.S.C.Mehadia, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Counsel for the petitioner states that the issue involved in the present Writ Petition is identical to one involved in the Writ Petition No. 3269 of 2005, which was disposed of by this Court vide order dt. 18.12.2007 and prayed that the present Writ Petition may kindly be disposed of in terms of the order dt. 18.12.2007 passed by this Court. Mr.Mehadia, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 states that though he does not dispute the factual and legal aspect of the matter, however, he submitted that, so far as refund of excess amount paid by the petitioner on and above the “notified price” from the date of interim order dt. 17.10.2005, which is kept in the fixed deposit, is concerned, the same shall be refunded to the petitioner with interest, which is accrued thereon, within six weeks. For the reason stated in the order dt. 18.12.2007 passed by 2 this Court in Writ Petition No. 3267 of 2005, present Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Rule is discharged. JUDGE JUDGE ssj