1N THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (s1 No?“ /2010 Lakhan Singh Tilgam son of Shri Lil Singh Tilgam, about 41 /I. pETIT'IONERs aged assistant years, Teacher, Government Primary School, Keshalpur Block Podi- Uproda District Korba (C.G.) Smt. Annu Anjana Masih Wife f Shri Praven Kurnar Masih Head o aged about 41 years, Master, Government Primary School, Kasniya Block Podi— Uproda District Korba (C.G.) VERSUS “a5 RESPONDENTS / State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deportment, Korba District Korba (C.GI) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under:— &%~, H5GH COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH AT B§LASPUR WRIT PET!T!ON (S) No. 2061 o? 201G PETiTlONER : Lakhan Singh Ti§gam 8r anoiher. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Siaie of Chhattisgarh 8: Others. WRIT PETiTiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF iNDiA SB: Hon‘b!e Sha'i Satish Mgnihotfi, ‘5; Present: Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate appearing on behaif oi Shri Amit Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitiener. Shri A.V.Shridhar, PL. for ihe State/respondents. GEBER IORAL) (Passed on 30th day of April, 20m) ;u By this petiiion, the petitioners seek a direction i0 the respondents to pay twb advance increments on passing of B.T.i. examination, on their ovan expenses, before eniering into service. . Learned counsei appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue invoived in ihe present case is no longer res inz‘egra as the same has been considered and decided by the Supreme Court in Ashe Saxena v. Stare afMP. a”: 0rs,’ . Learned counsei further submits that the instant petition is squareiy covered bv the decision as aforestated, Thus! the petitioners may be permitted to make representations to the respondent authorities to decide their cases for grant oi two increments in the light of atorestated decision, subject to verification ot'the fact ef possession at Bi}. eertificate on their own expenses before entering into service. . Learned oounsei appearing for the State/respondents submits that in the event, the petitioners make representation. the eame wiii be coneidered and decided, in accordance with law and in the tight of the decision oi the Supreme Court in Ashe Saxena (supra) within a period of tour weeks from the date of receipt oi the representation. . in View ot’ iorego'ing, according to the iearned counsei appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition tor adjudication. . Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed oi. \ Sd/— Amit Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ‘ 2009 (it), Myajsm 59