IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1029 of 2011 SUMITRA DEVI, WIFE OF LATE SHIV DANI SAH, RESIDENT OF SHUBHASH NAGAR, P.S.K. HAT, DISTT. PURNEA………………...PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE ALLAHABAD BANK, THROUGH AUTHORIZED OFFICER, ZONAL OFFICE, BHAGALPUR. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, ALLAHABAD BANK, PURNEA. 3. ANUP AMBASTA SON OF B.B. SAHAY PROPRIETOR ANAMIKA TRADERS AJAD COLONY BHATTA P.S. BHATTA BAZAR, DISTT. PURNEA…………………….RESPONDENTS. For the petitioner : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Bank : Mr.Ajay Kr. Sinha, Advocate. ----------- 02/ 28.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for Allahabad Bank and its authorities. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging notice under section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for the sake of brevity) issued under the signature of the Authorized Officer, Zonal Office Bhagalpur (respondent no.1) directing the petitioner to discharge her liability in full within sixty days failing which the secured creditor shall be entitled to exercise all or any right conferred under section 13(4) of the Act. 3 After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition in order to file an objection under section 13(3)(A) of the Act. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the - 2 - aforesaid liberty. However, if such an objection is filed by the petitioner before the authority concerned within one month from today along with a copy of this order, the concerned authority shall dispose it of in accordance with law within one week thereafter. Harish (S.N. Hussain, J.)