1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No.346 of 2010 In Second Appeal No.282 of 2009 (Kiantabai wd/o Tukaram Vaidya v. Laxman s/o Raghu Ikhar and others) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri S.U. Bhuyar, Advocate for Applicant/Appellant. Coram : C.L. Pangarkar, J. Dated : 3 rd May, 2010 This application has been purportedly filed under Order 1, Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Code though it is u/O 1 R 10. Smt. Kanchan Pandurangji Bhasme, who is sought to be added as party respondent in the appeal, is said to have purchased the property by registered sale-deed dated 19-6-2009 from respondent No.1 during the pendency of the appeal. In the circumstances, the application is allowed. Smt. Kanchan Pandurangji Bhasme be added as party respondent No.8 in the appeal memo. Appeal memo be amended accordingly. The appellant to take necessary steps with regard to respondent No.8. The name of respondent No.8 be corrected. Issue fresh notice to respondent No.1, returnable on 5-7-2010. Judge. pdl