IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18094 of 2010 HARIHAR PRASAD, SON OF SRI SUKHCHANDRA PRASAD, RESIEENT OF VILLAGE BHARAITI, POST OFFICE – YOGIPUR, VIA – HILSA, DISTT. NALANDA. ------- PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU.VIGILANCE ------- OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 2. 27.1.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 25.3.2010 and 24.4.2010 passed by the Special Judge, Vigilance (Trap), Patna, in Special Case No. 16 of 2008/102 of 2008 arising out of Vigilance P.C. Case No. 34 of 2008 by which part prayer of the petitioner for supply of documents has been refused by the court below. While producing the order impugned, I find that it has noted that “all relevant police paper” have been supplied to the accused through the signature of the earlier Advocate on 4.5.2009 and, therefore, the present application was frivolous. Since the petitioner still contends that not all documents were given to him, the court below IS directed to reverify as to whether all documents which have been filed under Section 173 (5) have been supplied to the accused and, if not, they shall be supplied to him. In case, the investigating agency refuses to supply the documents which have been mentioned in column 10 of the charge sheet, they shall be precluded from relying on the same during trial since it would cause serious prejudice to the accused. 2 With this observation, the application is disposed of. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)