IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2146 of 2011 Madan Prasad Vishwakarma Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 2. 2.9.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the learned counsel for the Corporation. This contempt application has been filed for alleged disobedience of the order dated 13th of May, 1999 passed in CWJC No.4129 of 1999. This Court by the aforesaid order directed the petitioner to present his representation stating the details of his legitimate dues to the Chief Accounts Officer of the Corporation within a period of one month. The petitioner filed his representation on 18.12.2000. However, the petitioner with reference to letter vide Memo No.3369 dated 30th of October, 2009 was reminded of the previous letter of the Corporation for furnishing the relevant details with regard to the date of his birth. The petitioner in reply to that submitted his reply on 27th of May, 2010. Learned counsel appearing for the Corporation submitted that the contempt application has been filed after long long delay and as such, this contempt application cannot be entertained. Considering the submissions of the parties, this contempt application need not proceed further. The same is, accordingly, dismissed. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)