IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 6TH JANUARY 2009 / 16TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 37757 of 2008(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.HARIDASAN, NELEKOLLALATH, MAYANAD.P.O. BY ADV. SRI.A.K.ABDUL AZEEZ RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. TAHSILDAR (RR), KOZHIKODE. 2. SECRETARY, THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE (TAXATION OFFICER, ) 3. BASHEER, S/O.ANAGHALU MOIDEEN KOYA, CHERUVANNUR, KOZHIKODE TALUK. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No. 37757 OF 2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 6th day of January, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that an application made by the petitioner for replacement of his vehicle with a new one was rejected on the ground that arrears of tax of Rs.1,87,300/- was due. According to him, there upon he filed a writ petition before this court as WP(c).No.28673/07, praying for allowing the replacement sought for by him on discharging the tax liability. It is stated that, following the judgment that was rendered by this court, tax liability was discharged and the vehicle was replaced. It is stated that despite all this, a fresh demand is raised by issuing Ext.P4. According to the petitioner he has no such liability and this contention has been urged in Ext.P5 objection filed by him before the 2nd respondent. It is stated that, despite having filed Ext.P5, without considering the same the 2nd WP(c).No.37757/08 /2/ respondent is continuing to enforce the demand. It is with that complaint the writ petition has been filed. Taking into account the case of the petitioner that, on receipt of Ext.P4 he has filed Ext.P5 objection, it is ordered that the 2nd respondent shall consider the claim raised in Ext.P4 in the light of Ext.P5 objection filed by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. In the meanwhile, further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P4 shall be kept in abeyance Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.37757/08 /2/