IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DECEMBER 2008 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 36294 of 2008(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.P.SUSMITHA, W/O.T.P.SANTHOSH, AGED 34 YEARS, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT VASUDEVA VILASAM U.P.SCHOOL, KOTHAPARAMBA, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SHRI.K.E.HAMSA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. THE HEADMASTER, VASUDEVA VILASAM, U.P.SCHOOL, KOTHAPARAMBA, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. THE MANAGER, VASUDEVA VILASAM U.P.SCHOOL, KOTHAPARAMBA, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. SHRI.A.J.VARGHESE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C) No.36294 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of December, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner was appointed as UPSA and the appointment was also approved. However, by Ext.P2, the Deputy Director raised audit objection regarding the approval of appointment. In response to which Exts.P3 and P5 explanations have been submitted by the petitioner and Headmistress respectively. The petitioner submits that Ext.P2 proceedings pursuant to ExtP1 has not been finalised so far, and as a result, the salary has been remain withheld. It is for that grievance, the writ petition is filed. 2. From the above, it is obvious that what remains to be done is finalisation of proceedings following Ext.P2. Since the petitioner and the Headmistress have submitted Exts.P3 and P5 explanations, it is only proper that the 2nd respondent considers Ext.P2 in the light of Exts.P3 and P5, with notice to the petitioner and Headmistress. 3. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the W.P.(C) No.36294/2008 -2- 2nd respondent to pass orders on Ext.P2 in the light of Exts.P3 & P5, with notice to the petitioner as also to the 4th respondent. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg