IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7378 of 2007 1. Chandra Bhusan Agrawal 2. Chandramauli Agrawal 3. Chandra Bibhuti Agrawal 4. Dr. Chandra Shekhar Agrawal, all sons of Late Dr. Shiv Nandan Prasad Agrawal and permanent residents of Village + P.O.and P.S. Tajpur, District Samaswtipur. Versus 1. State of Bihar 2. Commissioner, Darbhanga Division 3. Additional Collector, Samastipur 4. Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Samastipur 5. Circle Officer, Pusa, Samastipur 6. Md. Yunus son of late Md. Yusuf 7. Md. Murad son of Md. Yunus 8. Md. Javed son of Md. Yunus, all residents of Village- Gaddopur, P.O. Manpura, P.S. Bangra, District Samastipur ---- Respondents. ------ 4. 6.2.2009 Heard Mr. L.N. Das for the petitioners, Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, learned Assistant Counsel to Government Pleader No.8 for respondent nos. 1 to 5, and Mr. Abbas Haider, learned counsel for respondent nos. 6 to 8. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 9.4.2007 (Annexure-11), passed by the learned Commissioner of the District of Darbhanga, in Case No.R- 6/2005-06 ( Chandra Bhushan Agrawal & Ors. V. The State of Bihar & Ors.), whereby he has rejected the revision application preferred by the present petitioners on the ground that it is not maintainable. Respondent nos. 6 to 8 have placed on record their counter affidavit. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. Respondent no.7 had filed application before the learned Land Reforms Deputy Collector for correction of Jamabandi. After local inspection 2 conducted by the local Anchal Adhikari, the application was allowed and the Jamabandi was directed to be created in favour of respondent nos. 6 to 8 herein on the ground that they have been in peaceful possession of the lands in question for some time. The petitioners preferred appeal which has been rejected by the learned Additional Collector of the District of Samastipur in Jamabandi Correction Appeal no. 139/2003-04 (Chandra Bhushan Agrawal Vrs. Mohammad Unush), whereby the appeal was dismissed and the order of the learned Land Reforms Deputy Collector was upheld. The petitioners preferred revision application before the Commissioner which has been rejected by the impugned order on the ground that such a revision no longer is maintainable before me. It appears to me that the learned first authority as well as the learned appellate authority have come to the conclusion that respondent nos. 6 to 8 are in peaceful possession of the lands for some time. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. It goes without saying that it will be open to the petitioners to institute a civil suit before a court of competent jurisdiction for adjudication of right, title and interest. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar , J.)