CR No.8168 of 2010 (O&M) -1- ****** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.8168 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:27.01.2011. Hukam Chand ...Petitioner Versus Kailash Chand ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Rajendar Chhokar, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) CM No.31858-CII of 2010 Application is allowed as prayed for. CM No.31859-CII of 2010 Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner prays for withdrawal of the application. Dismissed as withdrawn. CR No.8168 of 2010 This revision petition is directed at the instance of the tenant who has been ordered to be evicted from the demised premises by the Courts below on the ground of personal necessity of the landlord. The only argument raised by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondent had got a shop vacated after filing of the eviction petition and as such his personal need ceased to exist. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record with his assistance. The respondent has proved the need of his son to start the business of readymade garments and general store in the demised premises and as such CR No.8168 of 2010 (O&M) -2- ****** the shop, which is allegedly got vacated under the staircase, is not fit for the purpose of the business which is desired by the respondent for his son. The shop under the staircase, which is allegedly got vacated, is too small a shop which cannot be put to any use except for the one for which it was already under use i.e. for the purpose of repair of watches. No other point has been raised. In view of the above, I do not find any reason to disturb the orders passed by the Court below against the petitioner. Hence, the present revision petition is found to be without any merit and as such, the same is hereby dismissed in limine, however, without any order as to costs. January 27, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE