*1* s.231.07.909.sxw kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.231 OF 2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2741 OF 2009 Uday K. Shetty. ..Plaintiff -versus- Pillai Nagarajan R.V. And others. ..Defendants ............ Mr.D.R.Tiwari, for the Plaintiff. Mr.R.C.Tripathi, for the Defendant No.3. ............ CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date : 21st October, 2011. P.C.: 1 In presence of the contesting parties, the consent terms dated 17.10.2011 are tendered. 2 It is stated that the Plaintiff does not wish to press the suit as against the Defendant Nos.1, 2, 4 and 5. The suit is, therefore, dismissed as against these Defendants. 3 As far as the Defendant No.3 who is the only contesting Defendant in the suit is concerned, it is prayed that the Plaintiff gives up all rights, title and interest in the subject flat and under the agreement dated 31.03.2001 for sale of immovable property. The Defendant No.3 has now acquired rights, title and interest in respect of the flat in question from other Defendants. The Plaintiff gives up his right in lieu of accepting a sum of Rs.4 lacs in full and final settlement of the suit claim which sum has already been paid by Pay Order to the Plaintiff. It is stated that the Plaintiff does not wish to press this suit any further. *2* s.231.07.909.sxw 4 The Plaintiff has perused these consent terms and although the Plaintiff has signed these consent terms and his signature is confirmed, in his presence, on a query from the Court, he confirms that he does not wish to press his claim and would accept the monetary sum as full and final settlement. 5 In these circumstances and when the Defendant No.3 who has signed in Hindi has been explained and interpreted the terms by the Interpretor of this Court, the same are also accepted and confirmed by the Defendant No.3. There is no impediment in law in taking these consent terms on record. They are, accordingly, taken on record and marked “X” for identification. Upon perusal thereof, I am satisfied that the private dispute has been settled and the terms do not contravene any provisions of law or public policy. 6 In such circumstances, there will be an order in terms of the consent terms. The suit is, accordingly, disposed of. Refund of the Court fees as per rules. No costs. 7 All interlocutory applications stand disposed of. Ad-interim/ interim order, if any, stands vacated. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)