Civil Revision No. 8036 OF 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 8036 OF 2010 Date of decision:9th December, 2010 Madhu Bala and another .......Petitioners Versus Vijay Kumar and others ........Respondents BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. Harsh Bunger, Advocate, for the petitioners. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?Yes/No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No ALOK SINGH, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that an appropriate application shall be moved before the Trial Court to summon the judicial file of the mutation case to prove the medical report produced therein. Learned counsel further states that in the event of moving such an application that application must be considered and decided in accordance with law without being prejudice from the impugned order. He seeks permission to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application before the Trial Court Civil Revision No. 8036 OF 2010 2 to summon the judicial file of the mutation case. In case of moving such an application, the same shall be decided in accordance with law without being prejudice from the impugned order. [ALOK SINGH] JUDGE 9th December, 2010 Shivani Kaushik