IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-25951 of 2011 Date of Decision : August 29, 2011 Sarfo Devi .... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Munish Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Learned counsel for the petitioner states that respondent no.2 be directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law on representation Annexure P-2, already made by the petitioner to respondent no.2. In view of the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, but without going into the merits of the claim of the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of, with direction to respondent no.2 – Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar to take appropriate action in accordance with law on representation Annexure P-2, stated to have been made by the petitioner to respondent no.2. August 29, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE