65 o/o L4.05.2010 Present: Mr. V.K. Anand forJhe petitioners. Mr. Sradhananda Mohapatra for respondents. +CM No. 67LO12OLO * Allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. n" W.P(C) No. 3333/2OL0 & CM No. 67OS12OLO By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners seek direction to direct the respondents to allow them to appear in the exams of 4ft and 6ft semesters in which they were earlier detained. Mr. Anand counsel appearing for the petitioners submits + G that the petitioners No. L to 4 were detained in 4th semester and petitioners No. 5 in 6ft semester due to short attendance but later on the respondent promoted ihe petitioners in the next semesters. Counsel further submits that their examination has commenced from LOtr May, 2010. Counsel further submits that all these petitioners are in 10ft semester and if they are not Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified iI \---- allowed to appear in the said exam then their academic year would go waste. Mr. Sradhananda Mohapatra enters appearance on advance notice on behalf of the respondents. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. These petitioners were detained in the 4ft semester and 6ft senTqster on account of the shortfall of the attendance. The respondent/University had constituted a committee to consider the request of the petitioners to promote them in their next semester and the committee constituted by the Vice Chancellor had examined the cases of these petitioners and some other students and then took a decision that the order of detention of these students in their respective semesters due to the shortage a of attendance are concerned, the same would stand, but as per clause 9 of the university ordinance t1,, these students were permitted to continue with their studies, subject to certain conditions. One of the conditions was that the students would have to complete all the requirements of the attendance of all courses of their respective semesters in which they have been detained at the close of the last semester of the LL.B. (H) ..lj programme. These students were also informed.that their result of 10th semester would be declared only after they pass the Semester for which they were detained and also that they would complete the attendance requirement of 75% during the LLB (H) programme and they shall not claim any concession in attendance in future. Clearly these petitioners have failed to fuhfiil the said criteria of meeting the shortfall of the attendance and now just at the fag end when already one exam of 4ft semester is over have approached this Court. There is no merit in the writ petition, the same is accordingly dismissed. nt/ rruuCIkcAMBHr&J. May 1.[,2OlO rkra '\. t€