IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 15TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 24TH KARTHIKA 1932 RP.No. 960 of 2010(G) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.37660/2008 Dated 22/07/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): WRIT PETITIONER ------------------------------------- M/S.VAS PHARMACEUTICALS (INDIA) LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR VASUDEVAN K.PANDALATH, 'PANDALATH BUNGALOW', THYKOODAM, VYTTILA, COCHIN-19. BY ADV. SRI.JESWIN P.VARGHESE SMT.G.VIDYA RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, OLAVAKODE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. ANTONY MUKKATH. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= R.P. No. 960 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 15th day of November, 2010. O R D E R This review petition is filed by the petitioner in the writ petition seeking to review the judgment dated 22.7.2010. From the review petition, I find that the petitioner wants a re-hearing of the writ petition itself, which is not contemplated by a review. If any finding by me is wrong, it is for the petitioner to challenge the same in appeal. Therefore, I am not inclined to entertain this review petition. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.