' '22 Wnt Petition (S) No. 3923 of 2007 PETiTiONER Versus 1) Jogeshwar Pradhan, S/o. Shri Daitaru Pradhan, aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher Gcvernmsnt Prima?/ Schoo! Jatoia, Biock - Pusour, Disb'ict Raigarh (CG). h the State of Chhattisgarh, th Secretary, School Departmeni, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, CG. The District Educanon Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, (CG). The Biock Education Officer. !ock Pusour, District - Rafgarh (CG). (Writ Petition under Articie 22S ofthe Constitution of IndEa) SB: Hon'bie Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri 2) fy Shr.i Sanjay Pate!, counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govf. Advocate for the State. (Passed on 11th Juiy, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents lointtv submit that the fact and question of iaw involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporatlon, Durg and another { 2006 (II) MPJR -CG SS}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 3-4-2006. Learned counsei appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. ^T Ate^ —2- In subsequent cases, i.s., Wrii Petition (S) No. 4139 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma Vs. The State Govt. of Chhattlsgarh and another) and other connected matlers, decided by this Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopai and the prospectus of Dipioma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenciature ofthe Basic Training Instituts i.e.. B.T.i., has besn changed and renamed as DipSoma in Education, i.e,, D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are aiso covered bv the decision in Writ Petition (S) No. 4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verms Vs. The State Govt. of Chhattisaarh and another (suora). Accordingiy, the writ petition Is aiiowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Uunicipal Corporation, Durg and another (supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the oetitioner has acquired D.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circuiars daied 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Raju 1