A.S.No.148 of 1998 A.S.No.148 of 1998 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY,J. It is reported by the learned Counsel for the respondents that respondents Nos.2, 3 and 4 have since passed away and to that effect he has also filed a memo dated 07.12.2022, furnishing the particulars of the legal heirs of the deceased respondents. Accordingly, an oral application, which is made for bringing the legal heirs of the deceased respondents on record, is allowed. 2. It is represented that second respondent/I.Chakrapani, died on 02.12.2017, leaving behind his, (i) wife / Maniyammai, wife of Late Sakkarapani, aged about 63 years, residing at Door No:108, Therkkukadu, Narasingapuram Post, Attur Tk., Salem Dt. (ii) daughter / Tmt. Lakshmi, wife of Ganesan, aged about 48 years, residing at North Thillai Nagar, Door No: , Narasingapuram Post, Attur Tk., Salem Dt. (iii) daughter / Uma Maheswari, wife of Senthilkumar aged about 46 years, residing at Adhi Dravidar Street, Thennampillaiyur Village & Post, 1/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S.No.148 of 1998 Pethanaickenpalayam Taluk, Salem District. (iv) son / Venkatesan, son of Late.Sakkarapani, aged about 40 years, residing at Door No:108, Therkkukadu, Narasingapuram Post, Attur Tk., Salem Dt. (v) son / Kannadasan, son of Late.Sakkarapani, aged about 36 years, residing at Door No:108, Therkkukadu, Narasingapuram Post, Attur Tk., Salem Dt. (vi) daughter / Rajeswari, wife of Mayakannan, aged about 34 years, residing at Door No; Adhi Dravidar Street, Lachiam Village & Post, Kallakurichi Tk. & Dt, as legal heirs to bring on record as respondents Nos.13 to 18 in the Appeal Suit. 3. It is represented that third respondent/ Subramani, died on 06.09.2019, leaving behind his, (i) wife / Selvarani, wife of Late.Subramani, aged about 60 years, residing at 3rd Division, Sollaiyar Estate, Valparai Taluk, Coimbatore Dt. (ii) daughter / Vanitha, wife of Kumar, aged about 40 years, residing at 3rd Division, Sollaiyar Estate, Valparai Taluk, Coimbatore Dt. (iii) daughter / Maheswari, wife of Ashokraj, aged about 38 years, 2/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S.No.148 of 1998 residing at 1st Division, Sollaiyar Estate, Valparai Taluk, Coimbatore Dt. (iv) daughter / Bhuvaneswari, wife of Mayil, aged about 36 years, residing at Door No: Gandhi Nagar, Coimbatore Taluk & District. (v) son / Balakrishnan, Son of Late.Subramani, aged about 33 years, residing at 3rd Division, Sollaiyar Estate, Valparai Taluk, Coimbatore Dt, as legal heirs to bring on record as respondents Nos.19 to 23 in the Appeal Suit. 4. It is represented that fourth respondent/ Rajendran, died on 04.09.2005, leaving behind his, (i) wife / Krishnaveni, wife of Late.Rajendran, aged about 64 years residing at Door No:435-B, 3rd Division, Sollaiyar Estate, Valparai Taluk, Coimbatore Dt. (ii) daughter / Udayakumari, wife of Sankar, aged about 40 years, residing at Door No: Kanmiyan Mettu Street, Palakkarai, Thiruchirappalli Tk & Dt. (iii) daughter / Nithya, wife of Ponraj, aged about 39 years, residing at Door No:3/210, Veerakkaran Koil, Sarkkar Kollapatti, Salem Dt. (iv) son / Arunkumar, Son of Late.Rajendran, aged about 35 years, 3/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S.No.148 of 1998 residing at Door No:435-B, 3rd Division, Sollaiyar Estate, Valparai Taluk, Coimbatore Dt, as legal heirs to bring on record as respondents Nos.24 to 27 in the Appeal Suit. 5. Therefore, the above said persons are residing at the above said address are brought on record as respondents Nos.13 to 27, in the Appeal Suit. 6. In this case, the Judgment was reserved on 02.12.2022. Immediately, thereafter, both sides learned Counsel represented to the Court that subsequent to the reserving of the Judgment, many of the parties to the Appeal Suit have come to an amicable understanding, therefore, they requested that the matter be kept pending for about two weeks, so that, they can file a Joint Compromise Memo. 7. In that view of the matter, the matter was kept pending for pronouncement of Judgment. However, even after two weeks, the learned Counsel on either side did not file any Joint Compromise Memo. They requested further time for filing the same. Accordingly, the matter kept 4/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S.No.148 of 1998 pending for another two weeks. 8. Further, on 03.01.2023, both sides learned Counsel made a representation that the entire issue of settling the matter is pending for the reason that one of the parties could not be contacted. Further, they would submit that there is likelihood of settlement if the said person is contacted. 9. In that view of the matter, this case is listed today under the caption “for clarification”. Today also both sides Learned Counsel submit that there is a likelihood of settlement. Therefore, the matter is de-reserved and posted for arguments before the regular Court. 10. In the meanwhile, the matter is referred to District Mediation Centre, Salem for mediation. (i) The first mediation session shall be on 20.01.2023 at 3.30 P.M., ; (ii) The parties shall appear before the District Mediation Centre, Salem on the date of mediation; (iii) The mediation centre can also issue notice to the parties who are not appearing and try to complete the mediation as expeditiously as possible 5/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S.No.148 of 1998 and submit a report before this Court on or before 01.03.2023; and (iv) List the matter on 02.03.2023 before the concerned Court. 06.01.2023 klt Note: Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendments as per the Memo dated 07.12.2022 and list the case on 02.03.2023. 6/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S.No.148 of 1998 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY,J. klt A.S.No.148 of 1998 06.01.2023 7/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis