?;';"<«. 1. HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILA8PUR PETTHONER RESPONDENTS WRrrPETmONfS^ No.3801of2OT8 » , Deepak Kumar NayA S/o L^e Shri ©.L.Nayak, agedabout 29 yeas, R/o Villag» Ledlla^ syisil Kota, Distfict Dantewaxla(C6) "- 'VERSUS' , . • • : 1. The State of ChhattisgariL ttrou^i the Seceetaty, Tribal WeS&re Depatimfftt, MasaSt^xys^' D.K.S. Bhawan; Raipur (CG) s «. 2. Tlie Commissioner, Tribal Wetfare Depar^ieut, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Tahsil and Disteict Raipur (CG) :;,:--:,'^:^^^^ 3. The Assistant ConimissicMtCT, Tribal Welfare Department, Jagda^nu, DisfrietBastar<CG) ? 4. Block Educaticm Qfficer, BtocK DariAa, Mstrid Bastar(CG) ; ,. :.,, ^ ^. ^ :": ii: WRH' PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hun'UeShriSaUshK.Aenlhutrii.fc s» Present: SlniRatEeAAitliDm^. Advocatetotep^ttMi^^ ^ Shri Y.S.Thakui^ DeputyAdvoeateGeaeralfiM-tte-;, State/respondents. ^ CTRALO»M ';rfr . : •'•••—-^.^- ; (Passed on 18tlldayof JuSy, 2008) ^ The petitionCT is the dependait of Late Shri G.L.Naydc, who was wotkmg as Assistant Teadier inlhe Tribal (School EAicatioa) Depwteient, <fied in lunwss on 21.02.2005. The petitioner inade an a0)UeatK»B fw appanfanart on compassionate basis on the grouad 1hat his father died in haness. Leamed couasel atmearing for the prfitioner suhnuts fhat Ifae said applicatian is still peading and has not been considered or decided bythe auttiwMes e®ncemed Shri^Anthony subnrits Ihat the petitioner does not want to press this petition oa merits, at tiiis stage. However, the respondeat-autfiorities may be &ectri to consider the pending applieatian ofthe petitioiner for grant of ctHnpassionate q)pointaient in aceordance with law, on its own merit. • Shri Thakur, learned eozmsel appeariag f<w the State/respandents submits th^ tiiCTe is no reasou as to why the airolication of fto petitioner as stated abov< ^ ^^' ^' s sesa-' -2- 4. 5. should not be e<»sidered expeditiously. Shri Thafeur fiuther subnMts (hat flie above-stated applieation ofthe petitioaer for conyassionate appointmart shall be eonsidered aad decided by the c<mcemed authority, inaceordaace'with law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible. ; In view of the foregoing, according to tearaed^couasel appeariag for the petitioner, nothing survives inlhe matter. Aecordingly, the petition is disposed of. No order asto eosts. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit