IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. 227 No... .%?»8.. /2010 PETITIONERS ^' .A ^' , &•?>'•'...- l^.-w'-"./' ^v^ .^^y ^^'^ ^\A ^'w ^- / ^ Smt. Gunvanti Bai w/o Lt. Mohan lal Aged about 60 years. Dilip Kumar S/o Lt. Mohan lal Aged about 37 years Pradeep Kumar S/oLt. Mohan lal Aged about 32 years Dhirendra Kumar S/o Lt. Mohan lal Aged about 30 years. All are the Resident of Rajendra Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District - Bilaspur (Plaintiff) -:VERSUS:- RESPODENTS ^^?N?^. / :-1. Smt. Rubi Saluja W/o Rajesh Saluja Aged about 36 years. R/oNear New life Heart care Hospital, Bilaspur, Tahsil 85 District - Bilaspur (C.G) ^2. Smt Sakuntala Saluja W/o Indar Singh Saluja Aged about 60 years. R/o Lormi, Tahsil - Lormi, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) - 3. StateOfChhattisgarh M^a3^e- <^ro Through - Sub Divisional Dfficer (RevenueJ) District: Bilaspur, Tahsil 85 District - Bilaspur (C.G.) /4. State of Chhattisgarh Through: - Collector District: Bilaspur, Tahsil 85 District - Bilaspur (C.G.) (Defendants) WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA '!"1"""" ^ ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHMTIS6ARH AT BIIASPOR Sinate Bench: Hon'bte Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mislira Writ Petitton (2271 htoJTS / 2010 ^ PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS Versus Smt. Gunvanti Bai and others. Smt. Rubi Saluja and others. ^ Shri Hemant Gupta, counsel for the pet'rtioners. Ku. Sangeeta Mishra, P.L. for the State. WRFT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTn-UTION OF INDIA : : ' : -...^^,.,n.^^ ORALORDER (24.02.2010) The petitioners have approached this Court under Article 227 of the Gonstitution of India seeking quashment of the order dated 26-12-2009and the memo dated 14-01-^)10 issued bytheSub DMsional ^Aagistrate. (2) From the order-sheet darted 24-12-2009 it woukt appear that on an applicaUon fUed by the respondents No. 1 & 2 proceedings urrcler^^ fe Sectton 145-146 of Cr.P.C. have been initiated by the Sub Divisi^nal Magistrate and thereafter the sub^ct interim order has been passed on 26-12-2009. The petitioners have fited this petition directty without approaching the jurisdictkMnal Court assailing the tmpugned^rd^' by filing appropriate proceedings. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ s (3) tn the opinion of this Court, since the order dated 26-12-^09 has been passed under Section 145-146 of Cr.P.C. the p^itioners have the remedy available to them under the relevant proviskxi ^)f tlw Code of Criminal Procedure. (4) tn the resutt, there being attemative remedy avaHable to the petitioners to challenge the order impugned herein, the instant writ „ pet'rtkin faite and is hereby dismissed on the ground of existence of altemative reinedy. The petitioners woutei be at tiberty to approach the jurtedictkMial Court uncter the retevant provisions of the Gode of Criminal Procedure. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge