, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT RTI ASPUR WriT Peii‘rion (S) Na. 4997 of 2007 Pe'fi'rianzr Professor Dr Annnd Mur-ri Agmwni, 5/0 La're. Shri B.L.Agruwal, aged abouf 66 years, Refir-ed Professer, Rasiden'f of MIG-34, Nehru Nagnr, Bibspur. Versus Responden‘rs 1. The 5mm of Chha'l'fisgnrh, fhmugh fhe Secremry, Ministry of Higher Educa‘rion, Secrefariaf Dk Bhnwnn, Rnipur (CG) The Commissioner, Higher Education Depar‘fmem, Government Science College campus, Raipur (C.G.) 3. C.M.Dubey Shiksha 5mm (Regisfered) ‘rhrough ‘Hm Chairman, CM. Dubey Pas-r 6mdm+e, Coliege, Link Road, Bilaspur (6.6.) 4. The C.M.D. Post 6mdunfe College fhrough H's Eoverning body & Ex—officio Secre‘rary/Principol, C.M. Dubey College, Bilaspur (C.6.) WRIT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Shgk Beach : Hon'blz Mr. Sunfish K. Agniho‘rr'i, J. Shri U. N. Awasfhy, Senior Advomfe wi'i'h 5hri M. K. Sinha, Advoom'e for The pe‘fifioner. 5hri Yashwom Singh Thakur', DepuTy Advoca‘re General for fhe respondents No. 1and 2. ORAL ORDER (Passed on +his so“ day of April, 2008) This mamr pemins fo refiml dues. This Cour'f in ‘l'h2 mn‘l'fer of Wrif Peri-lion No. 4642/2004 (Buijna'l'h Mandol Vs. The 5mm of Chha‘H’isgorh & o‘l'hers) and o'i'her connected mo'H'ers, decided on 31.1.2008, direc‘l'ed ‘l'he €ommi‘H’ee 1'o consider +he ma-H'er of re‘l'riol clues as 'lhe dispu'fed ques+ion of facfs were involved. The Commi‘l'fee was consl'ifu'red by +he S‘m're Government pursunn'l' 1'o @ 'the order da‘fed 19.642006 pqssed in WPNa. 1961/2006 (Sm‘l’. KeJa 8ni Chandrakur Vs. 5mm Governmen+ and ohm-s) and order da+ed 13.3.2008 passed in M.C.C. Na. 105/2008 (State of Chha-H'isgnrh and o‘r‘ners Vs. guijmi‘h Mundcd and ants-mar). Thus, this pafi'iion is square. I covered by fhe judgment and crder dated 315* of January, 2008 passed in WP. Na. 4642/2004 (Baijna'l'h Manda! Vs. The Sin-r2 of Chhaffisgarh & o‘thers) and afher connected ma'Hers, as submi‘Hed by learned cdunse! appearing for 'H'nz parfiés. Wiih +ha consen-r of fhe panties, +his pa'rifian is accordingly disposed of in 'H12 same 'i'erms i.e. fhe office of fhe Advoca‘fe Generui is direcfed 1’0 send 1'he case‘fo fhe Commi‘Hee, «vi-thin a period of 15 days from 'l’he do'fe of receipf of a copy of fhis order. Thereaffer, *he Commiffee shail issue no‘rice +0 'H1e pefi-rioner and 'i'he officers concerned, wi‘i'hin a further period of 15 days. The Commi++ee ska" consider and pass order, in accordance wii‘h law, offer affording proper oppor'tunify of hearing +0 fhe pe'i'i'iioner‘ The petitioner and fhe officer concerned may file addi'l'ionai documents, if necessary. The en-rire exercise, including paymen'i of refrial dues, if any, fa 'H'ie pe‘l’i'l'ioner be comple‘led within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall supply extra copy of the petition to learned counsel appearing for the respondents, for onward transmission to the said committee. Thakur ‘ Sd/— g Satish K. Agnihotri Judge