IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 4TH MAY 2010 / 14TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 14174 of 2010(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- NUJUMUDHEEN, S/O.SHOWKATH ALI, AGED 47 YEARS, KUZHIMTHADATHIL HOUSE, KIZHAKKUM BHAGAM, CHITHARA.P.O, MANKODU VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. K.SIJU RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. CHITHARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, CHITHARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SUMITH RAJ, S/O.SIVARAJAN, KRISHNAVILASAM, NALUMUKKU, MOONNUMUKKU.P.O, CHITHARA. 3. ANSHAD, S/O.ASHRAF, CHARUVILA VEEDU, ANOTTUKAVU, BOUNDER MUKKU, CHITHARA.P.O, MANKODU VILLAGE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 14174 OF 2010 (V) ===================== Dated this the 4th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner states that he submitted an application to the 1st respondent for a D & O Licence. Though he has not produced copy of the application allegedly made, he refers to Ext.P2 receipt, by which, according to him, the receipt of his application has been acknowledged by the 1st respondent. It is stated that though the application was made as early as on 15.12.2009, orders have not been passed and therefore the writ petition is filed. 2. Having regard to the above grievance highlighted in the writ petition, it is ordered that if the application made by the petitioner is pending, the 1st respondent shall consider the same with notice to him and respondents 2 and 3. Orders as above, shall be passed as expeditiously as possible at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp