IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 333 of 1990 Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- PRAVINCHANDRA V BHAVSAR Versus DHIRAJLAL C SANGHVI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR JD AJMERA for Petitioners MR RUPEN M SHAH for Respondent No. 1 to 7 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 28/07/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr. Ashok S. Patel for Mr. J.D. Ajmera, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that he has received instructions that the petitioners-tenants have voluntarily surrendered possession of the rented premises in favour of the landlord who has then sold the property to one Mahendrasing Joruba Parmar. He, therefore, states that the present revision has become infructuous. Accordingly this revision is disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Interim reliefs stands vacated. *ar*