IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31588 of 2008 PRADEEP KUMAR & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.08.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the State. Informant of this case is a Constable on Traffic duty. He has alleged the commission of offence u/Ss 307, 379, 504 & other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code. On perusal of the impugned order passed by the Sessions Judge, I find that he has mentioned in the order that the informant misusing his position, has instituted a false case for the reason that he created a reign of terror along with his associates. Petitioners are shopkeepers who made complaint before the Superintendent of Police, Vaishali . This is the reason for instituting a false case. The Sessions Judge has made all favourable comments and at last, rejected the prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail without assigning any reason. In case the Sessions Judge was satisfied, there was no reason for rejecting petitioners’ prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. However, considering the comments of the Sessions Judge, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners, namely, Pradeep Kumar, - 2 - Sonu Kumar, Mukesh Kumar Sharma and Shiv Shankar Prasad Jaiswal is allowed. In the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, they will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 113/08 to the satisfaction of CJM, Vaishali at Hajipur subject to the conditions as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C AKV/ (Mridula Mishra,J.)