-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 583 OF 2007 Gaur Chandan Kanhaiyalal Suman ...Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents Mr. C.K. Thomas, instructed by M/s. C.K.Thomas & Associates, for the petitioner. Mr. Rui Rodrigues for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Mr. R.M. Vanoo for respondent No.4. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE: APRIL 09, 2007. P.C. The learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 submits that the University has already framed the guidelines relating to re-valuation of papers. These guidelines provide time frame for re- valuation and declaration of results on re-valuation so that the students do not suffer on account of any delay in re-valuation of their answer books. 2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, we do not wish to interfere or issue any directions to the University as far as -2- the case of the petitioner is concerned. However, in view of the statement made on behalf of the University, we dispose of this petition with the direction that the guidelines framed shall be duly publicised and would come into force from the coming Academic Year. Petition is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.