IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.517 of 2006 HASINA KHATOON & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 03. 02.12.2009 The present writ application seems to be a proxy litigation on behalf of certain persons, may be involved in illegal activity after purchasing the animals from a fair of which petitioner No.1 is said to be a settlee. There is nothing available on the record to show that there is any restraint order so far holding of a fair by petitioner No.1 is concerned. The police and district administration are trying to regulate the transfer or transportation of the animals by people who are purchasers. Petitioner No.1 cannot be permitted to maintain the present writ application against such an action. The writ application in so far as petitioner No.1 is concerned, stands dismissed. So far as petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are concerned, in absence of any specific material having been brought on record in this regard, no writ or direction can be issued at this stage in the present form and content of the writ application. The writ application against them also stands dismissed. They may file fresh writ application with adequate material in support of their stand, if they are so advised. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)