HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. HON’BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Writ petition No.632612006 1. Banshi Lal Jain S/o Shri Fateh Lal Jain aged about 48 years Rm D — 318 Tagore nagar District Raipur(CG) Ghanshyam Purohit S/o Shri Ramprasad Purohit Aged about 55 years, R/o Bhatapara Dist Raipur Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Deptt of Town and country Planning DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. Chief Executive Officer Town and country planning District Raipur (CG) 3. Collector Raipur Distt Raipur (CG) 4. Chief Municipal Officer Bhatapara Raipur (CG) Petitioners Petition under Article 226!227 of the Constitution of India Present : Smt Renu Kocher, counsel forthe petitioners. Shri Praveen Das, Deputy Government Advocate for the State / respondents No.1 to 3. Shri Saurabh Sharmarcounsel for respondent No.4. ORDER (71h ApriL 2003) of the Court was passed by The following order Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri Saurabh Sharma, learned counsel for respondent No.4 submits that the writ petition tiled by the petitioners chaHenging the notice (Annexure P/1) inviting fresh tender has now become infructuous. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous with the liberty to the petitioners to appiy to respondent No.4 for refund of the tender fees in accordance with relevant provisions of l law. Chief Justice i Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge 2) l Sdl- Sd/- padma