IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No. 30813 of 1997 Between: 1 O. Shanker S/o Venkati R/o Sikikindrapur, Jakaranpally Mandal, Nizamabad Dist. 2 M. Narsaiah S/o Malaiah R/o Lingapur, Dandhapally, Adilabad District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Superintending Engineer, N.H.Roads, C.E. Building, Panjagutta, Hyderabad. 2 The A.P.S.C.C.F.C.Ltd., Hyderabad (FAC), Superintending Engineer (SW), Hyderabad. 3 The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Nizamabad, Nizamabad Dist. 4 The Superintending Engineer, S.R.S.Project, G.V.I., Balkonda, Nizamabad District. 5 The Superintending Engineer, P.Raj Circle, Adilabad, Adilabad Dist. 6 The Superintending Engineer, P.Raj Circle, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. 7 The Superintending Engineer, R&B Circle, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. 8 The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Karimnagar, Karimnagar Dist. 9 The Superintending Engineer, R&B Circle, Karimnagar, Karimnagar Dist. 10 The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Nirmal, Adilabad Dist. (Dismissed for default as per Court Order dated 5.9.2000 as against Respondents 1, 2 & 8) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ or direction more particularly one in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing the tender schedules of the Contract Works to the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary, and unreasonable for a consequential direction directing the respondents to issue tender schedules to the petitioners herein without insisting for production of Commercial Tax Clearance Certificates and also experience certificates. Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.J.RAMACHANDRA RAO (not present) Counsel for the Respondents : G.P. FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER: None appears for the petitioner. The learned Government Pleader submits that no cause survives in this writ petition and it has become infructuous. Recording the submissions made by the learned Government Pleader, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA, J Date: 5.4.2005 DA/SVV To 1 The Superintending Engineer, N.H.Roads, C.E. Building, Panjagutta, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintending Engineer, A.P.S.C.C.F.C.Ltd., Hyderabad (FAC), (SW), Hyderabad. 3 The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Nizamabad, Nizamabad Dist. 4 The Superintending Engineer, S.R.S.Project, G.V.I., Balkonda, Nizamabad District. 5 The Superintending Engineer, P.Raj Circle, Adilabad, Adilabad Dist. 6 The Superintending Engineer, P.Raj Circle, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. 7 The Superintending Engineer, R&B Circle, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. 8 The Superintending Engineer, R&B Circle, Karimnagar, Karimnagar Dist. 9 The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Nirmal, Adilabad Dist. 10 The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Karimnagar, Karimnagar Dist. 11 Two CCs to the G.P. for Irrigation & CAD, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 12 Two CD copies.