IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13594 of 2009 RAVI KUMAR SINHA @ RAVI KUMAR Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Sweta Srivastava @ Rozi ----------- 6/ 17.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the complainant, Mr. Jay Prakash Shahi. There is every allegation of demand and torture for its non-fulfillment but submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that complainant was living in adultery at Muzaffarpur. For that only, she left Delhi and came to Muzaffarpur gave birth of a child after 10 months of leaving the husband. So, a case for divorce on that ground is filed on behalf of the petitioner. On 18.10.2008 receiving its notice, it is said that the case under section 498A of the I.P.C. with imaginary allegation is filed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 2781 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M. (East), Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)