BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT@ BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH " M.c.c. No: 9gb? L /2oo7 APPLICANT : (bu :M/ s. J.K.Transport Co., Malviya Nagar, Durg. Vs. RESPONDENT : ,The Income Tax Officer, Ward— 1, Bhilai. \/ O APPLICATIQN FOR RESTORATION OF INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3E OF 2001 DISMISSED BY THE DIVISION BENCH OF HON’BLE SHRI JAGDISH BHALLA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SHRI DILIP RAOSAHEBVDESHMUKH, J VIDE ORDER DATED 19:66.2007 HIGH COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH AT BILASPUR ivision Benc D h Coram : Hon’bie Shri Jagdish Bhalia, Acting C.J. & Hon’ble Shri Dilip Raosaheh Deshmukh, J. M.C.C. No.262 of 2007 Applicant Mls J‘K.Transport (30., Malviya Nagar, Durg VefSuS Respondent The Income Tax Officer, W—ardl1, Bhilai Egsent : Shri P.R.Patankar, counsei for the appiicant. Shri Amit Choudhary, counsel for the non~applicant ORAL ORBER (passed on 24m August, 2007) The foHowing orai order of the Court was passedwby Hon’ble Shri Jagdish Bhalia, Acting Chief Justice : Heard on l.A.No.1, an applicatian for condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration, i.e., the M.C.C. The ground mentioned in the application for condonation of delay is sufficient. Learned counsel for the non-appiicant does not have any objection if the delay is condoned. Accordingly, l.A.No.1 is aliowed and the delay in filing this M.C.C. is condoned. Aiso heard on admission. The ground mentioned in the application for restoration of income Tax Appeal No.32l2001 is sufhcient. «e ma},¢W' , VI W, T, ‘ l Learned counsei for the non-applicant does not have any objection if the lncome Tax Appeal is restored. Accordingly, this M.C.C. is allowed and lncome Tax Appeal No.32/2001 is restored to its original number. List Income Tax Appeal No.32/2001 before the appropriate l Bench. lt shall not be treated as part heard by this Bench. ‘ Sd/— if Sd—/ ActrnWhreT3ustlce l ‘l‘ Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge