THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P. Nos. 4143, 4322, 4323, 4149 and 4321 of 2007 COMMON ORDER: All these writ petitions can be dealt with together as substantially they raise the same question. The writ petitioner in all these cases is an Industrial Establishment. The 2nd respondent, ESI Corporation has raised demand notices seeking contributions to be made in accordance with the Employees’ State Insurance Act 1948. The writ petitioner establishment sought for exemption from the operation of ESI Act. Since the State Government has not passed any orders on their applications seeking exemption, the present writ petitions have been filed. The learned Counsel appearing on either side Sri.A.K.Jaya Prakash Rao and Sri.B.G.Ravinder Reddy have submitted that during the pendency of the writ petitions, the State Government has passed orders through G.O.Rt.No. 1101 Labour Employment Training and Factories Deparment dt. 17.7.2009 accepting the recommendations of the Standing Committee for Exemptions and rejected the request of the writ petitioner industrial establishment and their sister concerns for granting exemption in terms of Section 90 of ESI Act 1948. A copy of this order has also been enclosed along with the vacate applications moved by the 2nd respondent Corporation. Therefore, the grievance nurtured in the writ petitions is not subsisting as of now in asmuch as the State Government has passed final orders rejecting the request of the writ petitioner industrial establishment seeking exemption from the provisions of the ESI Act, 1948. If the writ petitioner is desirous of calling in question the correctness and validity of the order of the State Government rejecting the request made by it seeking exemption from the provisions of ESI Act, it is always open to do so. Preserving liberty, these writ petitions deserve to be dismissed as the grievance of the writ petitioner since been redressed by the final orders passed by the State Government. Accordingly, all the writ petitions are dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO,J 07.07.2010. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P. Nos. 4143, 4322, 4323, 4149 and 4321 of 2007 COMMON ORDER: DT. 07.07.2010.