¢ mthe Honble Igh Court P (S) of Chhattish No 16g; arh 07% at llasgu (C G ) Petitioner ............. ,y ..... Ganpat Das Sahu V Aged 48 years S/o Shn Lakhan Das Sahu, AsSlstant Teacher \ny 0/ gm w ovt hla Primary Dlstnct School Rajnandgaon Murer (C G ) India Certlorarl, for Issuance Prohibition of wnt and m other the nature suitable WRIT or writs "we“ ....... r $RvW' www M4 " a w a ‘ w - w V E R S U S M1 The State Government of Chhattlshgarh‘ Resgondent / Through the Secretary, D KS Bhavan Ralpur( Commissroner ,2 Tribal Welfare Department ‘ Rajnandgaon (C G ) ‘ f - District Education Officer u r ) 3 ’ Rajnandgaon (C G) §% articles 22% of the Constttuhon of HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (5) No. 1045 of 2007 Singla Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Jusfice Sa‘tish K. Agnihé‘fri. Mr. Somkanf Verma, Advocate for The pafi‘rioner. Ms. Sunifa Jain, Panel Lawyer for fhe Stow/respondenm O R D E R (Passed on fhis 237d Day of February, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for fhe pe'tifioner submi‘rs fhai' fhe pe‘l'ifioner is working as Assis'ran’r Teacher. The pefifioner has obfuined B.T.I. Examinafion cerfifico'te on 23-9—1995, on his own expenses. learned counsel appearing for fhe pefifioner submits tha‘r the question involved, herein asfo whefher fhe feacher, who obfained B.T.I. Examina'l'ion Certificate on his own expenses, is entitled to two advance increments. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Vashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}. This Court in the case of Vashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Pe+i11oner : Ganpa‘r Das Sahu Versus Respondenfs : The Stafe Gavemmerrt of Chha‘rfisgurh & ofhers /2/@ Durg and ano‘l'her (Supra), came fa fhe conclusion 'l'ha'r The feachers, who had ob'l'ained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examina'fion Certificate on #heir own expenses, are covered by The circular dated 24.12.98 issued by 1’he S‘tafe Governmen‘i’ of Madhya Pradesh. Learned counsel for fhe peiifioner furfher submits 'rhaf The facTs and quesTion of law involved in The presenT case are squarely covered by decision of This CourT in The ms? of VashwanT Kumar Bharodwaj Vs. Municipal Corporafion, burg and anoTher (Supra), To which learned counsel appearing for The respondenTs fairly concedes and agrees wiTh The avermen'l' made by learned counsel appearing for The peTiTioner. Accordingly, The wriT peTiTion is allowed in Terms of The order passed in The case of YashwanT Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporal-ion, Durg and anoTher (Supra), subjecT To verificaTion of The facT as To wheTher The pe‘iiTioner has acquired B.T.I. Examinafion CerTificaTe on his own expenses as per The circulars daTed 24.12.1998 d 1.3.1999 and furTher wheTher he has been paid Two advance incremenTs or noT. No order as To cosTs‘ l f Sd/- isatish K.Agnihotri Judge Subhash,