: 1 : 938-10-cra=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 938 OF 2010 Nepal Sudhir Maji & Anr. .. Applicants v/s. M.S.R.T.C .. Respondents ......... Ms. Rina Kundu for the applicants Mr. C.M. Lokesh i/b G.S. Hegde for the respondents ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J DATE : 14th SEPTEMBER,2011. P.C. : 1. Heard learned advocates on both sides. 2. Rule. 3. Rule made returnable forthwith. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents waives service. By consent, taken up for hearing forthwith. : 2 : 938-10-cra=.sxw 4. The applicants had filed application for compensation before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Thane being M.A.C.P. No.922 of 2004. The learned Member of the Tribunal decided the said application by Judgment and Award dated 17th October, 2007. The applicants felt aggrieved by the said order in as much as according to the applicants, there was an arithmetical mistake as crept in paragraph 10 of the Award, cannot be accepted. This Court is of the view that in order to seek appropriate amount of compensation, the applicants will have to challenge the Award dated 17th October, 2007. The applicants have not been able to make out a case that order dated 14th November, 2008 is wrong. In view of the above, the Civil Revision Application is required to be dismissed. Hence, following order is passed. ORDER (i) Civil Revision Application is dismissed with no order as to costs. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)