IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41623 of 2008 SK.MANIR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 8.12.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Manihari P.S.Case No.80/2006 registered under Sections 376 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the F.I.R. although there is specific allegation of committing rape against the petitioner however that is absolutely false which would be evident on perusal of the compromise petition filed by the informant as contained in Annexure-2 which would show that the signature of the informant was obtained by the Chimni Malik, who happens to be brother in law of this petitioner. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that on perusal of the case diary, it appears that witnesses have supported the allegation as levelled in the F.I.R. against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail and the same is accordingly dismissed. V.K.Pandey Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.