'V^'V^' ^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. W.P. No. "3%-^ /2003. PETITIONER .^ ^€^ ^^tr^ --^'^v^.''" .<^:^ ^AA^'' ^' \^°&:v ^ y>- RESPONDENTS \^7° f^'ro\y ^ .y ^ ,<ry i-il^ Nohar Say s/o Baijnath, aged about 33 years^ Secretary, Gram Panchayat Kailashpur, Tehsil Surajpur, Distt* Surguja^ C.G. V E R S U S 1. The State of Chhattlsgarh, through Secretary, Panchayat Department, Raipur, C^G^ 2. The Sub Divisional Officer, ^ Surajpur, Distt. surguja» C»G<, ^.-* Chlef Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, surajpur^ Distt^ Sarguja» CoG^ ^4. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Kailashpur, Tehsil Surajpur, Distt^ sarguja^ C.G^ ^. 5, Collector^ Surguja^ Amblkapur< 6^-eiya Ram s/o Kewla Rajwar, aged about 26 years» r/o village Kailashpur, Tehsll Surajpur, Dlstt^ Surguja, CeG^ WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. -<^ ^NNN<1 HIGH COURT OF CHfiATTISOARH ATmjLASPUR Wxit Petition No. 383 of2003 PtetitkMQer ^NoIiar S^ Versus Respoiidteots The State <)f Cfaliatttsgmtt & otihera 8B: HQn'bte Mr. Justiee SatWi K. Agi^otrt, J ShriA, K. Prasad, Adwx^te^^ fbie petiticmer, Shri A, S. Kachwaha, Oovt, Advocate for the respoadents No, 1, 2 and 5< Shri Dilip Dubef, Advocaate for ffae respoiMlCTits No, 3 smd 4, Shri B, D, Guru, Advocate for tfae rcspoadexit No.6, ORDBR (17th November, 2006) The foUowmg orderofthe Coiut is passed byJustlcse SalAA K. AgttMiotri. 1, AccoidiEig to leanaed ccnaasel for the petttioxiie^ fto petiticmer wa& appoioited as Paochsyat Karmi aod thereadter Iie was dteclared as Secretaxy iiDxler tibe pxwdsions of SectioB 69 (1) of ffcie Madfaya Pradesh Paiich^yat Ra| Avam Gxaaii Swaraj AdhdbEi^etm, 1993. The petitioner was removed fi?otii fhe post of P&ifccbiy^ Karmi (^cretar^ Irf xt^olutioai dsrted 14,4.2001 ps^sed to^ fhe Qi^ai Paiicha^at, tliereafibers^ppewed by liie Ghnmai Ssfeha ^a 1&.4.2001, 2. Beisxg aggrieved, fhe petitioaaer preferred aai appeal^dfoxe fhe Siab Dwisioiial Officer, Sur^pur. The Sub IMrosioiial Officer x^txrted his appeal by oxder dated 15,10,2001 (ABBexiire P/2). 3. Beiaig aggrieved^ fhe pet&tioxiiCT p feCTed a revistoi befbre Qie CoUKtor, Siax^uja, District Sui^iija at Ambflb^^iir. TIae Coffitector, after IieariG^ aU fhe parties, by orda" dated 8.3,^02 (Aime^aaer P/3) qiiashed fhe resofaitfoit dated 14.4-2001 peussed by ttoe <S3»ixi Panchayat aod (hereafter appixyved }yy QTWSL Satilxa IQJ wsotiitioxx dated 18.4.2(X)1, The CoHector fiirther quiashed fhe oieder possed Thakur by Ihe Sub Divisioaal Offieer, Siwajpiar in ^qppeal ®a15.10.2001 on the ground fhat fbe oirier so passed was iiot in €KX?oxdaiicewifhi law, Thercfore, no gdevaace of fhe petitioaer sixbsiste, HGwever^ mstead of goiag back to fhe CoHector, seeldoig iEQptexiieiitettea of fhe oider, fhe petiliMier had choseaa to ffle an applteatton bedfore fhe Comxmssiaiaer, AmNkapur. Tfae Coxoxaalssioxier, aftbCT haviaig xiotfced fhat uaader fhe pxwisioiis of fhe Madhya Pi^dash P&xicfa^at Raj Avam Gxaaot Swara| Adlutaitymxi, 19@^ the Competeaat QflBcer was Director, Paxicbayat, teaiisferred ffaie matter to the office of the Dmector, PancfaaysA aad SocM Welfaro Oepartxaent^ Raipur, Diiriag peiixiaiicy of fhe case before t&e Director, Pandhayat aad Social Welfiare DepartxxKKirt, Rai^i^ the petitioiaer has prefi^red fhis wri^ petitioa agaax»st saskmg compMaace offhe oxder offhe Collector, Siaxguja, Learaed couiisel appeariiig fbr fhe petitiosfcCT subixrite that 110 case is pending before tihie Director, P&nclxayat aaaid Sc^ial Welfaro, Raipur. Leamed comisel appeaniig fter fhe petit&Mier fiirtih^r submats fhat fhe petttionerbe giaated l&erty to appax>ach tfae OoMectoa^ Siirgiya seeking im.plemexitatioii of fhe oxder datod 8,3,2002 passed by him. This petition is disposed crfwith fhe above-st^ed liberty, Ne oixia: as to costs, — Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge