IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1418 of 2008 1. PUKAR MAHTO @ RAM PUKAR MAHTO, son of Late Harindra Mahto 2. Ramdeo Mahto son of Harindra Mahto 3. Shiv kumar Mahto son of Late Harindra Mahto 4. Sunil Kumar son of Harindra Mahto 5. Nageshwar Mahto son of Late Laklan Mahto 6. Tunnu Mahto son of Ramdeo Mahto 7. Keshwar Mahto son of Lakhan Mahto 8. Budhiya Devi wife of Nageshwar Mahto, all are resident of village Sahpur Diyara P.S.Sonpur, Saran at Chapra. …Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Hirdya Rai, son of Mohan Rai, resident of village Shahpur P.S. Sonpur, Saran at Chapra. ...Opposite Parties. ----------- 03. 09.08.2010 Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 30.072006, passed in Sessions Trial No.82/07. By the said order, the application filed under section 228 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was considered and rejected. It appears that the said application was filed on the plea/ground that the injured sustained simple injury at the hands of the accuseds. Learned court below has found in the impugned order that there is specific allegation against some of the accuseds that they with an intention to kill the injured, assaulted by means of iron rod as well as Farsa on the head of the informant. In view of these materials appearing from records, learned trial court has rejected the petition seeking discharge under section 307 of the Penal Code. This Court does not find any patent illegality in 2 consideration of the matter by learned trial court meriting interference. There is no merit in this application which is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )