IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.1018 of 2009 Rajiv Ranjan Versus Kailash Yadav & Ors ---------------------------------- 2 21.12.2011 Mr. Ashok Kumar, learned counsel appearing on the instruction of Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, has submitted that by the impugned order the prayer of the defendant to reopen his evidence has been rejected and the impugned order is interlocutory in nature and therefore, the revision application is not maintainable and he may be permitted to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The prayer is allowed. The petitioner is granted four weeks time to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, failing which this revision application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. Md. Ibrarul ( V. Nath, J.)