C.W.P No. 15910 of 2008 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No. 15910 of 2008 Date of decision : January 20, 2009 Ajay Kumar, ...... Petitioner (s) v. State of Haryana and others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Jagdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG Haryana for respondents No.1 and 2. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner has assailed the order dated 2.9.2008 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from GVH Pindara, District Jind to GVD Dhons District Kaithal alleging that he has been repeatedly transferred. The second limb of the argument is that the wife of the petitioner is a JBT teacher at Pindara and that as per transfer policy, the Government tries to keep employed couple either at the same station or close by. C.W.P No. 15910 of 2008 ::2:: It cannot be lost sight of the fact that two of the four transfers which are being complained of were made at the request of the petitioner and would enure to his benefit, since on one occasion he was posted closer to his wife and on the second occasion he was infact posted at the same station where his wife was working. In the written statement it has been clearly mentioned that the petitioner never represented to respondents No.1 and 2 for being adjusted either at the same station of his wife or close by and that if he had so represented, his grievance would have been redressed. In the circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of. The petitioner may, if so advised, move a representation to the concerned authority for being adjusted as mentioned above, and it is expected that the concerned authority will pass an order thereon, keeping in view the assertion made in the written statement. ( AJAY TEWARI ) January 20, 2009. JUDGE `kk'