IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 29TH OCTOBER 2009 / 7TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 30792 of 2009(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- P.JAYAKUMARI AMMA, W/O.VIJAYAKUMAR, AGED 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT KARTHYAYANI BHAVAN, STUDIO ROAD, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAVEENDRAN PILLAI SMT.INDIRA RAVEENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SOCIAL WELFARE (B) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTRE, NEMOM. 3. THE SUPERVISOR, THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTRE, NEMOM. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.30792 OF 2009 (T) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is an Anganwadi Worker placed under suspension by Ext.P5 order dated 8.10.2009, pending disciplinary proceedings. Ext.P5 was preceded by Ext.P3 memo issued by the 2nd respondent containing certain allegations, to which according to the petitioner, she replied by Ext.P4. In my view, Ext.P5 cannot be said to be an action without jurisdiction and therefore, the remedy available to the petitioner is to move the first respondent for getting the order revoked. This the petitioner may do and in which event the respondents shall expeditiously pas orders on such representation. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/