IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.939 of 2006 GANESH MAHTO @ GANESHI MAHTO & ANOR Versus MOST.KISHORI DEVI & ORS ----------- 3. 21.10.2008 For the reasons stated in I.A.No. 5197/2006 the delay in filing this revision application is condoned. Heard counsel for the petitioners on merits. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. If the suit has been brought for setting aside the earlier judgment and decree of a suit, that by itself will not make the subsequent suit barred by resjudicata. That being so, this Court would not find any merit in this application, which is accordingly dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/