IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12557 of 2008 KUMARI ANUPAM SINHA, W/o Binod Kumar, resident of village- Salempur, P.S.-Gurua, District-Gaya. .................Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Gaya. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Gaya, District-Gaya. 5. The District Superintendent of Education-cum-District Programme Convenor, Gaya. 6. The Block Development Officer, Gurua, Blocki-Gurua, District-Gaya, Bihar. 7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Gurua, Block-Gurua, District-Gaya. 8. The Panchayat Sewak, Chelor Gram Panchayat, Block-Gurua, District-Gaya. 9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Chelor, Block-Gurua, District-Gaya. 10. Rubbi Kumari, W/o Janardan Prasad, village-Bara, P.O.& P.S.-Gurua, District-Gaya. 11. Abha Kumari, W/o Satish Kumar Saxena, Village-Bara, P.O.+ P.S.-Gurua, District-Gaya. 12. Shubhlata Kumari, W/o Praveen Kumar @ Ram Pravesh, Village-Sherpur, P.O. & P.S.-Gurua, District-Gaya. ............Respondents. ----------- 2/ 23.02.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner’s case is that she applied for the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra in the year 2004 but, was not selected. The persons selected did not join. Thereafter, she represented but nothing was done. Since, 2004 till 2009 she kept on waiting for disposal of her representation. I do not find that the writ application filed by the petitioner is maintainable. Considering the facts of the case, she cannot claim that any of her vested right has been infringed, on account of even non-consideration of her representation. This application is dismissed. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)