CW 7884/09 {1} In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench Judgment ** S.No. / Civil Writ Petition No. / Cause title 1. 7884/2009 Smt. Avdesh Sharma Versus RPSC 2. 8229/2009 Nirmala Parashar Versus RPSC 3. 8420/2009 Smt. Rama Sharma Versus State & Anr. 4. 8421/2009 Yogesh Kr. Pareek Versus RPSC. 5. 8435/2009 Sanwar Mal Verma Versus RPSC 6. 8627/2009 Seema Jain & Ors Versus RPSC 7. 8639/2009 Seema Jain Versus RPSC 8. 8730/2009 Subhita Kumari & Ors Versus RPSC. Date of Order : 05/12/09 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Advocates for petitioners Sarva Shri Bipin Gupta, Satyapal Poshwal, CP Sharma, Anoop Shailender Balwada, & Banwari Sharma Mr. SN Kumawat, for respondent-RPSC Mr. Ganesh Meena, Govt. Counsel for State All these petitions being based on common facts involving identical controversy raised at the bar are being decided together at joint request by present order. Being eligible for the posts of Teachers (Sanskrit)/General Teachers Gr.III advertised by Rajasthan Public Service Commission Ajmer (“PSC”) vide notification No.1/Exam. ”Ga”/Adhyapak/Sanskrit Shiksha/2008-09/1125/dated 20/06/2008 (Ann.1/CWP-8216/2009) petitioners submitted their applications for the post of Teachers (Sanskrit)/General Teachers Gr.III but their candidature was rejected only on the premises CW 7884/09 {2} of either having filled up wrong post Code or failed to fill up post Code in OMR sheet being appended to the application form or having been made available to the applicants through downloading from internet website of respondent-PSC – by virtue whereof, they were not permitted to appear in Teacher (Sanskrit)/ General Teachers Gr.III competitive examination, 2008 which was scheduled to be held on 22/07/09 as is evident from press notification dt.02/07/09. Under interim orders all of them were provisionally permitted to participate in process of selection and appear in aforesaid competitive examination, 2008 subject to production of proof regarding “Bar Code” and declaration of result of their participation was made subject to permission of this Court. However, pursuant to interim orders, Admit cards were issued to respective petitioners. Counsel submits that controversy raised herein has been decided by this Court in CWP-8359/2009 & bunch of others (Naval Kishore Sharma Versus State & Ors.) on 30/11/09) holding ad infra: “In the light of what has been observed (supra), all these writ petitions are disposed of with the CW 7884/09 {3} direction to the respondent-PSC to declare result of participation of the writ petitioners who have appeared under interim orders of this Court, by wide publication & circulation including through internet website of respondent-PSC within fifteen days and if placed in the merit list, respondents are directed to consider them for appointment as per order of their respective merit prepared by respondent-PSC in pursuance of advertisement dt.20/06/08. No costs.” Consequently these petitions are also disposed of in terms of judgment dt.30/11/09 quoted supra. No order as to costs. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p3/ 7884W09(8)-Dec5BarCodeTchrSnsk.doc