1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1052 OF 2009 (Maharashtra Vidya Prasarak Mandal, Khamgaon vs. Assistant Charity Commissioner, Buldhana Region) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JULY 01, 2010. Heard Shri Masodkar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Wasnik, learned AGP for the respondent. By the impugned order passed below Exh. 12, the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Buldhana, has found it necessary to issue notice to all persons, whose names were appearing in Schedule I because the proceedings before him were in relation to amendment in the Constitution by which category of founder member was sought to be abolished. Shri Masodkar, learned counsel contends that there are about 30 names, which are in excess of number of Trustees provided in the Constitution, and serving notice upon them and procuring their presence will unnecessarily consume time. He further states that as change sought does not affect anybody in Schedule I, issuance of such notice was not necessary. The learned AGP supports the order and contends that as the policy decision is being taken, the 2 Assistant Charity Commissioner has found it necessary to hear all. It is apparent that the category of founder members mentioned in the Constitution is sought to be deleted and hence the Assistant Charity Commissioner has found it necessary to hear all those whose names were continuing in Schedule I. I do not find anything wrong with the use of discretion by that authority. No case is made out warranting any interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.