IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29484 of 2008 JANGALI YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5 21.8.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner’s prayer for bail in a case under section 364 of the Penal Code was earlier rejected by this court on 16.8.2007. The victim has not named the petitioner and it is submitted that he has already remained in custody since 2006. However, during investigation one Sharwan Kumar was examined as a witness who has stated that Ram Karan Rai had demanded Rs. 2 lakhs and that Jangali Yadav had gone to collect the money from the informant at the railway station from where he was arrested. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Ram Karan Rai has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 14584 of 2008 on the ground that Ram Karan Rai was father of Golu Yadav who was the main person behind the kidnapping and he has been made accused only because he is the father of Golu Yadav. However, in the facts and circumstances of this case I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. This application is dismissed. However, the trial may be expedited. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)