IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.142 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on : 22-02-2011 Chandervir Singh ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG, Haryana MAHESH GROVER, J The only prayer that was made in the instant petition is that the headquarter of the petitioner be fixed at Panipat instead of Panchkula which is fixed during the period of suspension. The petitioner has claimed that he is 80% handicapped and it will be extremely difficult for him if his headquarters are fixed at Panchkula. Pursuant to the notice of motion, the impugned order has been reviewed and the headquarter of the petitioner has been fixed at Panipat which satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner who states that the instant petition may be disposed of as having rendered infructuous in view of the aforesaid. Ordered accordingly. Communication dated 15.2.2011 issued by Joint Director (Admn), Director Secondary Education, Haryana to the aforesaid effect is taken on record as mark 'A'. February 22, 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge