1 srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Appellate Side Civil Application Stamp No.10137 of 2006 In Review Petition Stamp No.24846 of 2005 In Civil Writ Petition No.2574 of 2005 Mrs.Sunanda C. Satam Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & ors. Respondents Mr.S.S.Vaidya with Mr.Vilas Mali for applicant. Mr.Suresh Bhosale, AGP for resp.nos.1 to 3. Mr.S.R.Page for resp.no.4. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. September 29, 2009. P.C. 1. This is an application praying for condonation of delay causing in filing Review Petition under Stamp No.24846 of 2005. 2. As per the office note the Review Petition is beyond time by 33 days. 2 3. Though no reasons have been given in support of the prayer for condonation of delay, we are satisfied that the delay caused of 33 days deserves to be condoned, more so because the claim in the main petition for recovery of payment of gratuity has been adjudicated upon by the Competent Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. 4. Hence application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A). (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)