WP/9564/2010 : 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9564 OF 2010 Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Sangli ... Petitioner V/s. Baburao Haribhau Jadhav ... Respondent Mr.V.S. Gokhale, AGP, for Petitioner Mr.R.S. Kate for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE: JANUARY 19, 2011 P.C.: 1. The Petition has been filed against the order of the Labour Court in Complaint (ULP) No.69 of 1999 passed on 5.4.2010. This order has been confirmed by the Industrial Court on 12.7.2010. That order is also challenged in the Petition. 2. Both the Courts below have found that the charge of misappropriation has not been proved. Neither the amount which was allegedly misappropriated by the respondent workman nor the period or date on which the act was committed were not mentioned in the chargesheet. Both the Courts below have found that the petitioner had not examined the persons who had complained against the respondent workman about misappropriating certain amounts. The Courts have therefore found that the charge was not proved. WP/9564/2010 : 2 : 3. As regards the charge of not handing over records of the Gram Panchayat, the Petitioner was able to establish that the Sarpanch himself had authorised him to keep the records in his custody due to the tense situation in the village. With respect to the third charge of absenteeism both the Courts have found that the charge was vague. 4. In my opinion, there is no need to interfere with these order passed by both the Labour Courts and the Industrial Court under the writ jurisdiction of this Court. 5. Hence, the petition is rejected.