IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46437 of 2009 1. MAHENDRA RAWT 2. Ranjan Rawat Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----- 2/ 01.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that demand is not justified by status of the petitioners’ family and other family members of the husband have been allowed bail. Specifically, it is said that differences are there in between the wife and husband being father-in-law and sister-in-law apprehending their arrest which can never be justified. Mr. Jyoti Ranjan Jha, learned counsel for the Opposite Party vehemently opposed the prayer of the petitioners. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 147-C of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Jamui subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)