IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH AUGUST 2010 / 19TH SRAVANA 1932 RP.No. 681 of 2010(A) --------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- KMCT AYURVEDA MEDICAL COLLEGE, (RUN BY KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST) MANASSERY, KOZHIKODE, KERALA-673602, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING TRUSTEE DR. K.MOIDU. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (DEPARTMENT OF AYUSH), IRCS BUILDINGS 1, RED CROSS ROAD,NEW DEHILI-110001 2. CENTRAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN MEDICINE, 61-65, INSTITUITIONAL AREAL JANAKPURI, NEW DELHI-110058. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & FAMILY AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 4. THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF AYURVEDA MEDICAL EDUCATION, AROGYA BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. ADV. SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN,ASST.S.G OF INDI FOR R1 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. T.M. SANTHOSH. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= R.P. No. 681 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 10th day of August, 2010. O R D E R This review petition is filed seeking review of the order dated 10-6-2010, by which I vacated the interim order already granted by the following order: “In view of the fact that Ext. P16 is only a show cause notice and Ext. P17 is only a communication, I do not think that it is necessary to continue the interim order. Accordingly, the interim order is vacated.” The ground for review is that it was by mistake a wrong Ext. P16 was produced, one page of which was relating to a show cause notice. If that be so, nothing prevents the petitioner from moving another stay petition for staying the order now produced as Ext. P16. Therefore, I do not think that there is any necessity to review the order dated 10-6-2010 insofar as it does not stand in the way of the petitioner seeking stay of Ext. P16 as presently produced. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.