IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc.No. 328 of 2009 Shashi Shekhar Versus The State of Bihar ---------- 13 25.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Delay in deposit of withdrawn amount in concerned account is alleged for temporary embezzlement that also of four months. Allegation does not justify refusal of anticipatory bail. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Amba P.S. Case No. 74 of 2007, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)