^"; 'i-'-' S^ 6 ". ^ SSi^l^H.'it:l'¥ r^t^^ IN THE HIGH COllRT^^CHyATTISGARH AT W.P. fSY 13^8 / 2007 PETITIONER A-' ^ / ^y/ ^y wy' /^^ / *''/^ •f / '/ / ,v--^ Sameer Kant Yadu S/o. late L.L. Yadu, aged about 39 years, Head Master, Shashkiya Kanya Purva Madhyamik Shala, Station-para, Rajnandgaon, Block- Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^ RESPQNDENTS ..--c^'' ^.^^.••——•^^ /y"'^s,'s :3?;>^5^ /y' iy~"..^si''s' ^ „»$""*--»,. /y !<A 'ff ts> ff ^'^'--c&^ ^s>isy^ '^.'w ' ^ ^r'-1' ,^€ !;?^-.lt. -ak ^flltf''..> "•v.yrsfWV^ 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Block Education Officer Block - Rajnandgaon District-Rajnandgaon (C.Q.) WRIT PETITION U/A 2 OF INDIA FOR WRITS IN THE NATURE^OE FQ R QTHER S U ITA B L E S^f^^^SSSt AT Bl'LASPU 3NII LIT PETIT10N (S^ No. 1358 of 2007. Petitioner Sameer Kant Yadu, R.esnondeats Versus ot uftnatti Present: Shri Goutam Khetrapa!, Advocate for the petitioner. Miss Deepali Paadey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. /i>"-"^.^ — nal ^.-pTsfl'.n.—^^?nn'7' t i~*a&S€G 011 y ~ 01 iVl%rCil, ^UU / 1. Learned counsel appeariag for the petitioner siibn'sits that tbe oetitioner is working as Head Master. The netitioner obtained B.Ed. Examination certifica.te on 14,08.1992; on his own Lsaraed counsel appearing for the petitioEer submits that the question inyolved; herein asto whether the teach.er, who obtaiDed B.Ed. Examiaation certificate on his own expenses, is eatitled to two advance mcrements. 3. According to leamed counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is ntitled to two advance increcieats in view ofthe decision ofthis Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs, MuniciBal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 CG 96}. This Court in the ca.se of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), came to the conclusio.n that the teachers. who had obtainad B. Ed. /'B.T.I. Examination Certificate on their ovn expenses, are eovered by the circular dated 24.12.98 issued by the State Govemment of 4. Leamed counsel for the petitioner farther submits 1hat the facts and auestion of law involved in the ca.se are squarely covered by decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mimiciiial Corporation. Durg and (Supra), to whicfa learned counsel appearing for the resnondents fairlv concedes asd asrees with the averment made by learaed counsel appeaiing for the petitioner. 5, Acc.ordingly; the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order ssed in tfee case and another (Supra), subject to s 3. / ^ verification of the fa.et a,s to the petitioner has B.Ed. ExamiBation Certificate on has owa exoenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 & 1 ,3,1999 and further •whether he has been paid two increments or aot. No order as to costs, Aimt Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge [