IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 11TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 20TH BHADRA 1929 WP(C).No. 19837 of 2007(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ N.M.AFZAL, SELECTION GRADE ASSISTANT, ELECTION(EQUIPMENT) DEPARTMENT, ADN.SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.BLAZE K.JOSE RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY,GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (SERVICES-A) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION(SERVICES-A) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI. BIJOY CHANDRAN, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V. GIRI , J ========================== W.P.(C) NO. 19837 OF 2007 ========================== Dated this the 11th day of September, 2007. JUDGMENT The petitioner was placed under suspension pending enquiry under Ext.P3 order dated 02.05.2007. The petitioner has sought for the review of suspension by Ext.P4 representation dated 31.05.2007. The learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that the Government has rejected the petitioner's request in Ext.P4. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the petitioner's right to challenge the order stated to have been passed by the Government in Ext.P3 order or in approaching the Government seeking revocation of the suspension order, if there is a change of circumstances. I make it clear that I am not expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner in this regard. The writ petition is disposed of as above. V. GIRI, JUDGE. rv