ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.7419 OF 2008 PETITION NO.7419 OF 2008 PETITION NO.7419 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.Rajesh More for the Petitioners. Mr.Nitin V.Gangal for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 12th November, 2008. : 12th November, 2008. : 12th November, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . The Petitioners have challenged the order dated 27/08/2008 where, admittedly the learned District Judge specifically observed that Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No.68 of 2007 is disposed of as not pressed. The same was against the grant of interim order in favour of the Petitioners-Plaintiffs at Exhibit 5. The Court has further observed that the interim protection in favour of Original Plaintiffs to continue till then, but after the issue under Section 9-A is decided, then fresh opportunity ( 2 ) be given to both the parties to hear and pending the interim application, if moved. The Petitioners are aggrieved by this portion of granting opportunity to hear the matter again. 2. At this stage, without observing anything, liberty is granted to the Petitioners to apply, in case, adverse order is passed after decision under Section 9-A as mentioned. 3. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]