..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2474 OF 2008 Mr.Sameer @ Chinnu Mohammed Husain Khan. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.S.V.Kotwal, Adv. i/b. Mr.M.K.Kocharekar, Adv. for the applicant. Ms.A.T.Jhaveri, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 14th August,2008. DATED : 14th August,2008. DATED : 14th August,2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.I-208 of 2008 of Shanti Nagar Police Station, Bhivandi. The said case is mainly under Section 394 of IPC. 3. The complainant has stated that the present applicant along with coaccused assaulted him and Nisar. The complainant has further stated that thereafter Nisar came to be robbed of cash and mobile phone. The mobile phone is recovered at ..(2).. the instance of the coaccused. Cash of Rs.3000/- was recovered at the instance of the present applicant. In the said incident, Nisar sustained five injuries. One of the injuries was grievous in nature. 4. In the present case, the investigation is going on. Hence, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant bail at this stage. Hence, application for bail is rejected. 5. Liberty to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for bail before the Sessions Court after the charge-sheet is filed. The learned Sessions Judge to hear the matter afresh and dispose if of on merits without being influenced by any of the observations in this order. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)