IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.719 of 2006 ANIL PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6. 26.8.2008. This Cr. Revision has been filed against the order dated 25.7.2006 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Samastipur in Maintenance Case No. 4 of 2004 thereby the petitioner has been directed to pay maintenance of Rs.600/- per month to opposite party no. 2. Heard learned counsel for both the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that earlier the petitioner had paid Rs.1,25,000/- to the opposite party no. 2. In spite of that she filed a separate maintenance case in which the impugned order has been passed. It is further submitted that actually the petitioner is a mentally disordered person and he is not able to pay the amount of maintenance. Considered the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and also perused the impugned order. - 2 - On perusal of the impugned order, it appears that in the course of the enquiry the petitioner himself admitted to pay Rs.600/- to opposite party no. 2 and on his statement the case was disposed of on the terms arrived at between the parties. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order. Accordingly, this Cr. Revision is rejected. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)