@ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH Coram : HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CIJ. & ' HON’BLE SHRI£ITNIL KUMAR $INHA, J. Misceiianeous Appeal No. 895 of 2602 i APPELLANT : Jagdish Prasad S/o Ramayan CLAIMANT Agrawal, aged about 4O years, ' ' occupation Stamp Vendor Rio ViHage Sakti, Distt. Janjgir - Champa Versus 1 ; RESPONDENTS 1. Ghasia Ram S/o Piia Ram - BhaghéI, aged about 52 years, i R/o Darra Bhata, Police Station 1 Ma: Kharauda, Tahsi! Sakti, Distt. ‘1 Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 1 I DRIVER 2. Kanti Gopai, S/o RB. Vishwas, R/o Shivnagar, Baico, Tahsil and District Korba OWNER p) The Orienta! Insurance Co. Limited; Korba (C.G.) INSURER Anneal Under Section i73 of the Motor Vehicles Act: 1988 Present : ‘Shri NP. Koshta; learned counsel forthe appellant. i ORDER i (gm August, 29:38) The foilowlng order of the Court was ‘passed by ,Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: On 29-04—2004 while admitting the appeal, the foilowing order was passed : “Shri Vishnu Koshta, Advocate for the appeltant. AppHcation for urgent hearing, if any, is anowed. Heard, Admit, ieaving open the question of maintainability. issue notice, P.F. be paid within seven days, faiiing which the appeal shall be liable to be dismissed.” 5 ‘2? order dated 29—04-2004 has not been compiled with as the 1 process fee‘has not been paid t§il date though a period of more than four years has elapsed. 3. Vln this View of the matter, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for non«compiiance of the order dated 2Q-D4-2004. 4. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 29-04-2004, r Sd/ r, Sd/— CHIEF JUSTICE For the reasons best known to the appellant, the above i Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ' ‘ / 1