1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2512 OF 2010 1. Narayan S/o.Venkatrao Shirase Patil, Age-32 years, Occu-Business, R/o.Kinwat, Tq.Kinwat, Dist. Nanded 2. Parmeshwar S/o.Pandurang Panpatte, Age-42 years, Occu-Social Service and business, R/o.Himayat Nagar, Dist. Nanded APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Mr.G.P.Shinde, learned counsel for applicants. Mrs.V.A.Shinde, learned APP for State CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J. DATE : 16/07/2010 PER COURT : 1. By the present application, the applicants have approached this Court for their release on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest in connection with CR No.20/2010, registered in Himayat Nagar Police Station. 2. Heard learned counsel for applicants, learned APP for State. 2 Perused the papers of investigation till carried out. 3. Earlier on 02/07/2010, interim protection was granted in favour of these applicants. 4. It appears that this offence came to be registered on the complaint of one Shriniwas Prabhakar about the alleged incident took place on 07/03/2010. Like that, these applicants have also filed complaint against this Shrinivas Prabhakar and others and on that count, offence was registered in the same police station vide CR No.19/2010. On perusal of report in both these crimes, one fact is clear that in the offence registered against one Pravin and others by Narayan Patil, who is the first applicant in this application, this Shrinivas was also roped as one one of the culprit. It appears that, subsequent to that CR No.19/2010 registered against complainant in this case, he has also filed Crime No.20/2010 against these applicants. Shrinivas, complainant in this CR has filed one affidavit, of which photo copy is placed on record at Exh.'C'. This affidavit was filed before the learned Sessions Judge, Nanded on 22/03/2010, wherein it was stated by the complainant that due to mis- 3 understanding, he had filed complaint against these applicants and now the disputes between them are settled. Apart from it, there is statement in that affidavit that one golden locket on his person was mis-placed during the scuffle between the parties, and on suspicion, he has roped these applicants. It reveals from the said affidavit and papers of investigation that merely on suspicion, or to settle the otherwise disputes between the parties, the applicants are implicated in CR No.20/2010. But the fact remains that because of this stand taken by the complainant himself, a case is made out to enlarge the applicants on anticipatory bail, hence following is the order - O R D E R 1. Application is allowed. 2. Interim protection granted on 02/07/2010 is hereby confirmed and to continue till filing of the charge sheet. 3. Application stands disposed of accordingly. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/JULY 2010/cri-appl-2512-10