12.rpw.28-10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.28 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITON NO.10111 OF 2009 Prashant Kumar and others. ..Petitioners. Versus Shikshan Shulka Samiti and others. ..Respondents. ... Mr.Uday Warunjikar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr.Rajesh Behre, Advocate a/w. Ms.Priya Vaotty, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.S.V. Pitre, Advocate i/b. Manoj Wadekar & Asso. for respondent No. 2. Mr.S.R. Nargolkar, A.G.P., for respondent No.3. Mr.Girish Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No.4. .... CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 18, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for both the sides. 2. This is an application for review of the order dated 21st January, 2010. As has been observed in the order dated 21st January, 2010 the petitioners were challenging a resolution of the Shikshan Shulka Samiti on the ground that the Committee 12.rpw.28-10 2 has decided the fee treating the Course as a full time course, but, according to the petitioners it was a part time course. Therefore, by relying on letter dated 1st April, 2009, we have said that it appears that the course is full time course and therefore no exception can be taken to the fee fixation made by the Samiti. If the controversy whether this is a full time course or part time course is pending with the State Government and if the State Government ultimately decides that controversy, it goes without saying that our order will not come in the way of fresh fixation of the fees. We do not see any reason to review. Review Petition is rejected. (D.K. DESHMUKH,J.) (A.R. JOSHI, J.)