Cr. R. No.1724/2009 1.11.2011 I have heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the State. The charge has been framed against the applicant under Section 306/498-A of the IPC. It has been argued from the side of the applicant that the applicant is not a relative of the husband, which is an essential requirement under Section 498-A of IPC. The charge as framed does not mention the relationship between the husband and applicant. Therefore, it appears that framing of charge is without adequate application of mind of facts of the case and necessary ingredients of the law. Accordingly, this revision is allowed. The order of framing charge against the accused/applicant is quashed. The trial Court will reframe the charges, if necessary. (Sushil Harkauli) Acting Chief Justice AK