IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.131 of 2007 GOBARDHAN PANDIT Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 03/ 14.08.2008 Heard. This application has been filed against order dt.19.12.06 passed by S.D.J.M., Banka in Maintenance case No. 11/2002. Thereby and thereunder the petitioner has been directed to pay maintenance of Rs. 800/- per month to Opposite party No. 2. The marriage between the parties is admitted. The only submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that after order of maintenance in another case 498A, I.P.C., the Opposite party admitted it. She was pregnant and, therefore, presumption should be made in regard to re-marriage of the Opposite party, considering the submission of the Opposite party regarding perusal of impugned order. I find no order learned counsel for the petitioner Opposite party. There is no material on the record that the Opposite party even after passing order so far the quantum of maintenance legal. He does not require any facts and circumstances, I find no ground to interfere in the impugned order accordingly same is rejected. M k Chy/ ( Ghanshyam Prasad, J) 2