IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M- 20737of 2011 Decided on:- 22.07.2011 Uma ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.S.Bedi Present: Mr. Raj Mohan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sushma Chopra, Addl. A. G. Haryana. **** M.M.S.Bedi, J(Oral) Petitioner's daughter-in-law had committed suicide on 12.3.2011 while her marriage had taken place on 22.2.2009. Counsel for the petitioner has vehemently contended that as per the original suicide note, there is no allegation against the petitioner. The original suicide note has been retained for said reason by the complainant and only photocopy is available with the petitioner and the prosecution agency. I have heard counsel for the petitioner and considered all the facts and circumstances of the case. As per the averments in the FIR, the complainant has specifically referred to the name of the petitioner who alongwith other family members had mal treated the deceased and hence the deceased was threatened to kill her. The case is at initial stage of investigation. On account of statutory presumptions against the petitioner in the peculiar circumstances of this case, no ground is made out to grant the concession of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. This order,however, will not in any manner prejudice the right of the petitioner to seek the concession of regular bail on the basis of the material gathered by the prosecution during investigation after surrendering before the Illaqa Magistrate or after her arrest by the Investigating agency. 22.07.2011 (M.M.S.Bedi) mamta Judge