^^ •^! <^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHHASTISGARH AT BILASPUR I&l^; W.P. (S) N0. )«^ /2010 PETITIONER ^ ^^,.- \^^y ;1W^}.>"" ^ ^ ...^•^.'••- ^...v . •:'; ' ^^' ^^:^ RESPONDENT ^' Chetan Khadatkar, Aged about 30 years, S/o Shri. Mohan Rao Khadatkar, R/o Bajrang Chowk, Mathpara, Raipur, CG VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. State of Madhya Pradesh Through Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP) < 3. P.K. Janwade, Aged about 55 years, Incharge Chief Engineer, Public Works Depai-tment, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ^ 4. Chhattisgarh State High Power Caste Scnitiny Coininittee, Through Director, Pandit Deendayal UpadHighay Nagar, Ravishankar University Campus, Raipur. ^ WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA /<s HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR f ••.' • • . • . • ••-., • • /• . .• .. ' • ..••.. WRTTPETmON (-8) No. 1047 of2010 PETmONER : Chetan Khadatkar. ^ • :-• "•, . VERSU8 ' : , , ':;. : '; ' 1' RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. '. :'\ • • '^'^ WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUnON QFJNDIA SB: Hxm'bte Shri Satish K. Asmhotri, J: Present: Shri RahulTamaskar, Advofcate forthe petitipner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lavvyer for the State/respondent No. 1 / 1. 2. 3. f ORALORDER (PassedoB-42m day of March, 2010) Leamed counsel appearmg for fhe petitioner submits lliat the respondent No. 3 is holding the post of Incharge, Chief Engineer, Public Works Departmeiit, EAipur on tiie basis of claiming his eategory.as ScheduledCas^category.Accc)^^ the resffondefit N6. 3 has^not produceda% pQFtiiicate m support of his claim as reserved catididate. Shri Tamask^ fur^r s^^ tfaat this tssye has b^^i raised a^ the :\ respondent No. 4. f Be/that as it m^, wifhput e^essmg aj^ case, since fhe matter is pending comiderati^ befbre fhe respondent No. 4, it is not expedient and properto entertain this petitionatthis ^age. '.\:^tt^^ Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not maintamable. However, on the request of leanied comisel appearing for the petitioner, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to make fi'esh representation before the respondent No. 4, ifso advised. Sd/- _ , SatisbK.A8"'t*»tn Judge Aj?iit