IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1545/2009 (Nilesh @ Pintya Suresh Bhagat & another .vs..State of Maharashtra ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : S.R.DONGAONKAR, J . DATE : 25th JUNE, 2009 Heard Shri Thakkar advocate for the applicant and Shri Sonare APP for state. Learned APP pointed out that there are several cases of such type registered against the applicant. Allegations against the applicant are serious. It is also submitted by learned APP that applicant had given wrong name at the time of seizure of the incriminating articles. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that inspite of the direction by Additional Sessions Judge, the trial of the applicant before the J.M.F.C., could not be expedited as one of the accused Prakash is undergoing life imprisonment and he is not produced before the court. Learned J.M.F.C. is already directed to expedite the trial. He is again directed to expedite the trial. If the accused Prakash is not produced, despite the production warrant, learned J.M.F.C. may proceed with the trial of the applicant by separating it and decide it expeditiously. With above observations, application is rejected. Liberty to applicant to file fresh application for bail, if trial is not concluded within a period of six months. Learned J.M.F.C. is directed to send quarterly report about the progress of the trial. JUDGE smp