IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos. : 4082 & 4083 of 2009 Petition under Section ____ of CPC., to revise/against the order dated ______ in NO : of 0 on the file of the court of the C.R.P.No.4082 2009: Between: Erla Koteswaramma S/o Lakshmi Narayana R/o Pulipadu Village Gurajala Mandal Guntur District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Vutla Venkateswarlu S/o Chinna Saidaiah R/o Ramapuram Dachepalli Mandal Guntur District 2 Vutla Harihara Prasad S/o Chinna Saidaiah R/o Ramapuram Dachepalli Mandal Guntur District 3 Erla Saidaiah S/o Chalamaiah R/o Ramapuram Dachepalli Mandal Guntur District 4 Erla Savitramma W/o Subbaiah R/o Ramapuram Dachepalli Mandal Guntur District ( 3 & 4 are Not Necessary Parties ) .....RESPONDENTS C.R.P.No.4083 2009: Between: Erla Kanakam S/o Narayana R/o Pulipadu Village Gurajala Mandal Guntur District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Vutla Venkateswarlu S/o Chinna Saidaiah R/o Ramapuram Dachepalli Mandal Guntur District 2 Vutla Harihara Prasad S/o Chinna Saidaiah R/o Ramapuram Dachepalli Mandal Guntur District 3 Erla Saidaiah S/o Chalamaiah R/o Ramapuram Dachepalli Mandal Guntur District 4 Erla Savitramma W/o Subbaiah R/o Ramapuram Dachepalli Mandal Guntur District ( 3 & 4 are Not Necessary Parties ) ....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.G.DHARMA RAO Counsel for the Respondents : The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4082 & 4083 OF 2009 COMMON ORDER: Since these two revisions arise in view of the same question, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The only grievance of the petitioner is that even though similar issue arises, which is asked before by way of applications pending the appeals, the Court below did not consider the same and dismissed the applications. Hence, the present revisions. On considering the submissions and also the material on record, it is seen that the very applications are not maintainable. It is needless to mention that unless and until the main appeals are heard in full on merits, it is very difficult to find out as to whether the existing issues are proper or not and there is no warrant to claim any additional issue as such. These matters are to be heard only after hearing the appeals and not before. In view of the same, giving liberty to the petitioner to point out the same at the time of hearing of the appeals, Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J 28.08.2009 MD/TSY