IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8706 of 2010 1. HARENDAR BHAGAT S/O RAMKESHWAR BHAGAT R/O VILL BIHARI BUJURG, P.O.TENUA, P.S.GUTANI, DISTT-SIWAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR , THROUGH THE SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE COLLECTOR -CUM-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SIWAN 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION SIWAN 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION ESTABLISHMENT COMMITTEE THROUGH THE COLLECTOR SIWAN ----------- 2 04/02/2011 The Court does take notice of the fact that annexure-2 was issued as far back as on 24.08.1995. Since there is nothing to indicate from the pleadings or annexures of the writ application that the petitioner has made any claim over the respondents with regard to the relief in question, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ application at this stage because there has not been any failure on the part of the respondents to perform public duty in granting relief by way of demand made by a citizen. If that be the position, then the petitioner should approach the respondents for the claim made in the writ application and if he does not get the relief, there - 2 - may be an occasion to look into the issue but not at this stage. This writ application is dismissed with the liberty as above. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)