IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 608 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 15, 2011 Anshuman Bajaj. …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Gurbachan Singh Bhatia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State. Mr. Surjit Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jagdev Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that entire amount pertaining to the impugned order has already been paid and if any amount is due, the same shall be paid within 30 days from today. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that he may be permitted to CRR No. 608 of 2009 withdraw this petition, however, learned Trial Court be directed to expedite the trial. Present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the hearing of the case and to conclude the case as early as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. February 15, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2