'ETITIONB 'OURT OF CHHA'ITISGAEH ATBILASPUR WRJT PETITION (S)_^To.3ffl8 of2007 Smt. Sofiya Shandey, assd about 47 years, W/o Shri Manoj Jain, Resident of Kapoor Dafai, Chhota Bazar, Cfairimiri Collieaiy, District Korea, (C.G.) 1. State of CIihattisaarh, Through - Seeretan', Department ofSchool Educatioii, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) • 2. The District Education OfBcer, Korea, District Korea, C.G. 3. President, Maiiageaient Comimttee Tfai-ough Principal, Boys Primary School Chiriniiri Coilieary Vidyalaya, CliinTiiri, Disttict Korea (C.G.) 4. The director, Directorate, Public Institution, Pension Bada, Raipur, C.G. ?/SIT PETITIQN UNT2ER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTTJTION OF INDIA, Siiiele Bench : Hon'ble Jiutice Shri Satish K. Agnffiotri. y Present: Shri R.K.Jaisvi'al, Advocate for the petitioner. ihri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Advocate for the State. ¥- 1. (Passed on 26"' day of June, 2007) The question of law iavolved m tiiis petition is whefher the teaehers working in govemmeat aided private schoois are entitled to the benefit of the recommendation ofthe Pifth Pay Commission uader the proyisioiK of the Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Sikshan Sanstha (Adfayapakon Tafha Anya Karmchariyon Ke Vetno Ka Sandaya) Adhiniyam, 1978 fhenceforth 'the Adhinivam. 1978") and the rules made thereunder read witii the Madhva Pradesh Revision of Pav Rules, 1998 (hmceforth 'the PavRules, 1998' 2. The identical question of law was considered by this Court in batch of matters i.e. Smt. A.Lall Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Othere (W.P. No. 4108 of 2005) with other connected matters, and tfae same was disposed ofbyjudgment and order dated 6.2.2007. It was held that the petitioaers who ais working ia fdlly Govemment aided private schools are entitled to the rewsed pay scales w.e.f 1.1.1996 as prescribed under the Pay Rules, 3998. This Court had granted certain directions fiirther for the puipose of disburssmeat ofarrears. o. ^- Adimttedly and jointlv, it is submitted bv the Seamed counsel for the parties that this matter is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 passed by this Court in the case ofSmt. ALall Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ofcers and other conDected matters (Supra). 4. As a result, for the reasons stated in the judgment aad order dated 6.2.2007 oassed in W.P. No. 4108 of 2005 Smt. A.Lall Vs. State of C5ihattissarh & Others and oth petition is allowed iai the same terms aiid conditions. connected mattere (supra), the writ Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge Asms