LPA No. 735 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No. 735 of 2011 Date of decision 2.8 .2011 Om Parkash and another . Appellants Versus State of Haryana and another .. Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. Nilesh Bhardwaj, Advocate for the appellants 1. To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 2. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? M.M.KUMAR, J. 1. Despite the substantive relief given by the learned Single Judge by quashing the order of recovery passed against the appellant, the present appeal has been preferred under Clause X of the Letters Patent against the judgement dated 11.8.2010 rendered by the learned Single Judge. The only issue raised by the appellants is that they should be paid interest for the amount of pension and other retiral benefits on account of the recovery notices issued against them. We are unable to accept the request made by the appellants. The net result of the order passed by the learned Single Judge is that the appellants would not be required to refund the excess amount paid. Therefore, the law has come to the rescue of the appellants for deleting the recovery of excess amount paid then it would not be equitable for the appellants to ask for interest even if there is some delay in payment of the retiral benefits. The appeal is wholly without merit and does not warrant admission. Dismissed. (M.M.Kumar) Judge (Gurdev Singh) 2.8.2011 Judge okg