IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 33316 of 2010(L) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- SREE MUTHAPPAN INDUSTRIES, ERIYA PO,ANANDASRAM(VIA)KASARGOD, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER,SMT.SIMI VINOT BY ADV. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR SMT.K.HYMAVATHY RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. CHIEF FOREST CIBERVATOR(SPECIAL AFORASTATION)&NODEL OFFICER & CONVENOR,STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE, FOREST HEAD QUARTERS,VAZHUTHAKKAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014. 2. FOREST RANGE OFFICER, KANHANGAD-671531,KASARAGOD DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BENNY VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 33316 of 2010 L ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 4th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P5, a stop memo, requiring the petitioner to close down his saw mill. According to the petitioner, his application for NOC is pending before the first respondent and, therefore, at this stage, respondents are not justified in issuing Ext.P5. 2. Although learned Government Pleader disputed the eligibility of the petitioner to have the NOC issued, it is a fact that the application is pending before the first respondent. 3. Therefore, I direct that until orders are passed on the application made by the petitioner and it is communicated to the petitioner, further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P5 will be kept in abeyance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks