IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No. 28607 of 2008 Between: Rayudu Ganesh, S/o. R.Venkateswar Rao, R/o. Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 2 The Asst.Commissioenr of Endowments, Rajahmundry, E.G.District. 3 The Executive Officer, Sri. Gowthami Jeevakarunya Sangam, Rajamundry, E.G. District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue order direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the orders of the 1st respondent passed in O.A.No.123 of 2007, 124 of 2007 and 125 of 2007 dated 30.09.2008 having no power and jurisdiction under Section 83 (4) of A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowment Act 30 of 1987 as amended by Act 33 of 2007 consequently set aside the same and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.R.K.AMERANDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO.28607 of 2008 ORDER: Heard Sri P.R.K.Amarendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Endowments and Sri V.T.M.Prasad, learned standing counsel for the third respondent- temple. S r i P.R.K.Amarendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that since the petitioner has an alternative remedy of appeal, he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail the alternative remedy. Liberty is accorded. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J Dt:30-12-2008 usd