RFA No. 1802 of 1999 (1) In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh RFA No. 1802 of 1999 (O&M) Date of decision : 20.5.2011 Shyam Bihari ..... Appellant vs Land Acquisition Collector and another .... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Pritam Saini, Mr. Bhag Singh, and Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocates, for the landowners. Mr. H. S. Hooda, Advocate General, Haryana with Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. This order shall dispose of following appeals RFA Nos. 1802, 1858 to 1864, 2117, 3010 to 3012, 3014 to 3017 of 1999, RFA Nos. 1119 to 1125, 1498, 1705, 1869, 2029 of 2000; RFA No. 5074 of 2001; and RFA No. 810 of 2002; as common questions of law and facts are involved in these appeals. The landowners have filed the aforesaid appeals seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the State of Haryana vide notification dated 28.2.1995 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act') sought to acquire land situated within the revenue estate of villages Kaul and Chandlana, Tehsil and District Kaithal, for construction of Pharal minor from RD 0 to 40000. Notification under Section 6 of the Act was issued on 20.12.1995. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, 'the Collector) assessed the compensation vide his RFA No. 1802 of 1999 (2) award dated 25.4.1994 @ ` 1,35,000/- per acre for village Kaul and vide award dated 28.6.1997, the value of acquired land of village Chandlana was determined @ ` 1,30,000/-per acre. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the objections were filed by the landowners. On reference, the learned Court below assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ` 1,85,000/- per acre for village Kaul and upheld the award of the Collector for village Chandlana. It is this award which is impugned in the present set of appeals. Learned counsel for landowners submitted that the issue raised in the present set of appeals is covered by judgment of this court in RFA No. 795 of 1999 – Smt. Phullo and others vs State of Haryana and another decided on 14.10.1999. Learned Advocate General, Haryana, did not dispute the aforesaid factual position. For the reasons recorded in Smt. Phullo's case (supra), the appeals are disposed of in the same terms. 20.5.2011 (Rajesh Bindal) vs Judge