IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 7TH JULY 2011 / 16TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 10442 of 2011(F) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- 1. P.R. CHANDRIKA CHANDRAN, ANJALI BUILDINGS NANGIARKULANGARA P.O., HARIPAD. 2. DEEPU, S/O.CHANDRABHANU, ANJALI BUILDINGS, NANGIARKULANGARA P.O., HARIPAD. 3. DEEPTHI, D/O.CHANDRABHANU, ANJALI BUILDINGS, NANGIARKULANGARA P.O., HARIPAD. BY ADV. SRI.S.SUDHISH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, REGISTERED OFFICE MUMBAI, DIVISIONAL OFFICE KOTTAYAM, P.B.NO.609, KURIAN UTHUP ROAD, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER (LEGAL), KOTTAYAM DIVISION. BY ADV. SRI.S.EASWARAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 10442 of 2011(F) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE DECREE IN O.S. NO.11/2001 DATED 29/10/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE SUB COURT, MAVELIKARA. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.(CIVIL) NO.417/2011 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 31/01/2011. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE E.A. NO.82/2011 IN E.P. 480/2004 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE HONOURABLE SUB COURT, MAVELIKARA. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE ORDER IN E.A. NO.82/2011 IN E.P.480/2004 OF THE HONOURABLE SUB COURT, MAVELIKARA. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 01/02/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 10442 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T First petitioner's deceased husband had availed of a housing loan from the respondent mortgaging an immovable property owned by him. Subsequently he expired and payments were also defaulted. This lead to the filing of O.S.11/2001, by the first respondent resulting in a decree against the legal heirs. The execution petition filed by the first respondent is presently pending consideration before the Sub Court, Mavellikara. 2. In the meanwhile the petitioner moved Ext.P5 application before the first respondent seeking waiver of interest. The said application has not been considered and this resulted in the filing of this writ petition. 3. The fact that the representation has been received, is confirmed by the respondent. Therefore all W.P.(C) No. 10442 OF 2011 :2 : that is required is a direction to the 2nd respondent to take a decision on the representation and convey the same to the petitioners. This has to be done by the respondent as expeditiously as possible at any rate within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the Writ Petition before the concerned authority for appropriate action. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge