IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9510 of 2004 DURGESH NANDAN, son of late Vidya Prasad Singh, resident of village – Bhikhanpur, P S – Shahkund, District – Bhagalpur. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Secretary, Animal Husbandry Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Regional Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Bhagalpur, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5. Animal Development Officer, Gahan Gau Vikas Prakhand, Munger, District – Munger. ----------- 05. 23.8.2010 In view of the supplementary counter affidavit, coupled with Annexures B and C, it is evident that the problem which has been created is attributable to the petitioner through and through and in the above circumstances, no direction can be issued in favour of the petitioner for payment of salary. It is evident even from the communication dated 19th August, 2010 that the petitioner is still missing and is not reporting for duty despite a decision taken by the respondents in this regard. It is a motivated and misplaced kind of writ application, which does not deserve consideration. The writ application is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)