IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY WRIT APPEAL NO. 1102 of 2009 (WASR No. 77074 of 2009) (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 09/04/2009 in WPMP No. 9833 of 2009 in WP No. 7487 of 2007 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Coal Mines Provident Fund Organisation Rep. By its Commissioner, Jagjevan Nagar, Dhanbad, Jharkhand and another ..... APPELLANTS AND A.Hanumantha Prasad and three others .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY WRIT APPEAL NO. of 2009 (WASR No. 77074 of 2009) JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari ) Aggrieved by the order, dated 09.04.2009 made in WP MP No.9833 of 2009 W.P. No.7487 of 2009 by a learned Single Judge suspending the order No.CPF/120/G.Khan/Vig./647, 635, 665, and 641 dated 19.3.2009 whereby the respondents herein were imposed with the penalty of dismissal from service, the Department of Coal Mines Provident Fund Organisation is in appeal. The respondents herein who are working as U.D.C. in the appellant organization, were charge sheeted on the grounds that during the year 2007 they went on illegal strike against the shifting of the Regional Office of the Organisation from Hyderabad to Godavarikhani and deserted their duties by keeping themselves absent willfully. The enquiry ordered against them has culminated into the impugned dismissal order. Assailing the said order, the respondents herein filed the above writ petition. Along with the writ petition, they also filed WP MP No. 9833 of 2009 seeking to suspend the impugned dismissal order and to continue them in service and the order impugned in this writ appeal came to be passed. Learned counsel for the appellant further submitted that the appellants herein have also filed Vacate Petition before the learned Single Judge and the same is pending. Having heard the learned counsel on either side, since the appeal is preferred against an interlocutory order and since the Vacate Petition in WV MP No. 1604 of 2009 filed by the appellants herein is pending, we are not inclined to entertain the present appeal. Suffice it to direct the Registry to post the WV MP No. 1604 of 2009 before the learned Single Judge on 17.08.2009 on the top of the list. With the above direction, the writ appeal is disposed of. No order as to costs. ____________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari ____________________ Justice G.V.Seethapathy August 11, 2009 MAS