1 S.B.Cr.Misc. II Bail App. No. 606/2008 (Ramchandra Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 20/02/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. R.K.Charan, for the petitioner. Mr. J.P.S.Choudhary, Public Prosecutor. Mr. Vinod Sharma for the complainant. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State as also counsel appearing for the first informant. Perused the order impugned. Learned counsel for the petitioner and first informant submit that the parties are of same family and they have compromised the matter. An affidavit of the injured Smt. Barju and Pappu have been filed before this Court stating therein that they have compromised the matter and they have no objection if the petitioner is released on bail. Injured Hanumanram appeared before the trial court and filed an affidavit compromising the matter. Counsel for the first informant submits that the parties have compromised the matter and no evidence is likely to come against the petitioner in view of the compromised arrived at between the parties. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the parties have compromised the matter, having considered the 2 oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Ramchandra Ram S/o Mangla Ram be released on bail in FIR No. 122/07 P.S. Balesar, district Jodhpur provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP