1 S. B. CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO. 44/2006 (UIT, UDAIPUR & ANOTHER V. KAIZAR ALI) Date of Order: : 07-02-2007 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH TATIA Mr.Dilip Kawadia, for appellants. Mr.Himanshu Maheshwari, for respondent. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The appellant is aggrieved against the concurrent findings of facts recorded by the two courts-below with respect to a plot measuring about 831 sq. ft. which was dealt with by Shambhunath by executing sale deed dated 7th January, 1981 and which was further sold by the purchaser Dhapubai to the plaintiff by registered sale deed on 22nd January, 1994. The plaintiff prayed for permanent injunction apparently on the ground that the plaintiff is in possession of the suit property and the two courts-below concurrently held that the plaintiff is owner of the property and, therefore, entitled to decree for injunction. I do not find any substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. Scd.