IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION No. ^{^^ /2003 i\^ ^ V.P. Singh S/o Late Shri S.N. Singh, Aged about 54 years, Ex-Principal, Janta Higher Secondary School, (An unaided Private School recognized under the provisions ' ofBoard af Secondary Education, Madhya pradesh Regulations, 1965) R/o4-D. StreetNo.19, Sector-11, Zone- l,Khursipar, BHILAI, Distt. DURG (Chhattisgarh). ^fcV^-'C^ ^^%^'> ^B< "", SWV'^2,-..-•"" ^%c^^"""' T^-""' ^^ ...PETITIONER SSii -VERSUS- Director, Public Instructions, Madhya Pradesh (Appellate Authority Under Regulation 79(3) ofthe Board of Secondary Education) ,- Bhopal, MP. / Director, Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh, (Appellate Authority Under Regulation 79(3) ofthe Board ofSecondary Education) Pensonbada, Raipur, CG. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/22'7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRlATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS. 3-HC-22 snisi'iR 1T?;na7.3W;?I 5?:iW?IT??i &,. l^i^i'r''!t.'' T^ tinw^, w-Awis, wcii'yy ^ wwirwnw..^•£-.??..?..-.yA-,( ant?!'FRU^R ^ifrti '^i'-ifci''il-< -WS ^ fezt ipaj^K ^i srfigqan^i 26-8-2003 Petitioner by Sbri Pank^j Sbrivastava, Advocate. State by Dr. N.K. Shukl4i, Addl. Advocate General. toflay for admission but ia view of The petition is Usted the lunited nature of relief cjlauned by the petitioner and as the State lias no objection, it is 'ful purpose would be served ui dircction to rcspondcnt No.2 appeal froiii respondent No. mifhin a stipiiiatEd period. Aiuiexure P-3 whereby tfie PubUc Instructions, Chliattisj of fhe appeal filed by Instructions, Bhopal for decidin learaed counsel appeariag foi beiag disposed of, as no us^ keepiag the pctitiou pendiug. TIie grievaace of tbe p^titloner is to the uaaction on ttie part of ttie respondents ia n^ was filcd on 10-8-1998. it dispostng of the appeal whicti srdiagly, a prayer is raadc for a to SUIIUUOD. thc rccord of tbc Accbrdia |1 aud take a decision tbereon Alttentioif of the Court is iavitEd to petitioner nioved the Director, ^arb Raipur for caUiag the i^cord' before tbe Director, Public fhe same on inerits. Since no bilm 1- [«»fiiq XI-HC-22 sn^B'w l^iwan^i ^tH ^fe^ T T«?'ifMWi, V-^W, Vwwy 3Tli^T tR^ wqcir aiNich •^ 200 action was taken, the petitionei| relief. Accordingly, fhe petition i( fhe respondent No. 2 to suininc|n the Director, PubUc Iiistructioili and take a decision on the sajd been disposed of, within a peric|d of receipt of the record. It is m^de ctear ftiat tfae Court is not expresstag aay opmion on ttte|merits of tlie petitioner's case aad it is not left for the said res]|iondent to decide the appeal on inerits oa thc basis ofthc niaterlal availablc on record. Thc writ pctition is Consequently, I.A. No. 915/200 ^Fil^l'^l'l HIMcTt' ^ f^^t <fai+$i< iTSri^WOT^iI has approached this Court for » disposed ofwith a dirEction to the record of the appeal from s, Bhopal (Respondent No. 1) appeal, it' it has not already of two months from ttie date accordingly disposcd o£ stands disposed of. ^"s___ -—— Sd/- P.C NAIK Judge y ^