IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7093 of 1988 with SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7094 of 1988 with SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7130 of 1988 with SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7213 of 1988 with SPECIAL CIVIL APAPLICATION No 7236 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- MANILAL M KHETANI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR KS JHAVERI for Petitioner MS HARSHA DEVANI, AGP, for Respondent No. 1 MR PARESH UPADHYAY for Respondent No. 2 M/S PURNANAND & CO for Respondent No. 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT Date of decision: 08/12/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT In this group of five matters, common questions are involved seeking, virtually, same relief. When the matters were called out, the attention of the Court was invited to a resolution of the Government dated 18.4.2000, a copy, whereof, is placed on record along with other papers. The petitioners are stated to be entitled to the benefits arising out of the aforesaid resolution. Therefore, no orders are required to be passed in this group of petitions, as the grievance of the petitioners has been redressed. However, it was stated that liberty may be reserved. In the circumstances, this group of five petitions shall stand disposed of in view of the aforesaid Government resolution and the papers submitted along with it. In case of difficulty, liberty is reserved for revival. Rule shall stand discharged with no order as to costs. (J.N.Bhatt, J.) (vjn)