IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4738 of 2009 Sapna Kumari, daughter of Late Chokh Lal, resident of Mohalla-Nala Road, Ambedkar Bhawan, P.S.Kadamkuan, District-Patna. ………………………………..Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Finance, Old Secretariat, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer,Patna Municipal Corporation, Budh Marg, Patna. 3. The Executive Officer, Kankarbagh, Circle, Patna Municipal Corporation, near Kankarbagh Tempo Stand, Patna …………………………………….Respondents. ----------- For the petitioner :- Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey,Advocate. For the Patna Municipal Corporation :- Mr. Bishwa Bibhuti Kumar Singh, Advocate. 3. 27. 04. 09. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Respondent Corporation. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although for redressal of her grievances the petitioner has already filed a representation before Respondent Corporation. However, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation for redressal of her grievances with regard to payment of retiral dues of the father of the petitioner. In case such representation is filed within a period of four weeks along with certified copy of present order, the Respondent No.2 shall consider the same and dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. Upon such consideration, in case representation is disposed - 2 - of in favour of the petitioner, Respondent No. 2 shall simultaneously issue necessary order with regard to claim of the petitioner so that the grievance of the petitioner as raised in her representation in the light of the order passed on her representation could be redressed without further delay. With the above observations/directions the writ application is disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)