ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.9389 OF 2005 PETITION NO.9389 OF 2005 PETITION NO.9389 OF 2005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.Sanjay Shinde i/by Mr. M.M.Sathaye for the Petitioners. Ms. Manisha Kuwar for Respondent Nos.1,3, 4A, 4B and 5. Mr.A.I.Patel, AGP for Respondent No.7. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 19th March, 2009 : 19th March, 2009 : 19th March, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The parties have arrived at settlement and filed consent terms dated 12th November, 2008 in a Writ Petition No. 6250 of 2005 and that Writ Petition is already disposed of accordingly. 2. In the present Writ Petition, the parties press upon the said consent terms by filing additional consent terms. Other side has no objection, if this Writ Petition is disposed of on the basis of the said consent Terms. The consent terms are signed/ thumb impression by the ( 2 ) concerned parties and respective advocates. It is also recorded that the contents are explained to them and they understood the same. Both the Advocates state that the said consent terms is well within the framework of law and the record. 3. In view of this, the present Writ Petition is also disposed of in view of the consent terms. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]