1 43 wp.1549.10 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1549 OF 2010 Amit D. Mepani. ... Petitioner Vs. Bhaskar Upadhya and anr. ... Respondents ----- Mr. Zakir A.B. for the Petitioner. Mr. P.A.Pol, PP for the State. ----- CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and U.D. SALVI, JJ. DATE : 23 rd August, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2 The learned counsel for the Petitioner accepts that similar reliefs were claimed by the Petitioner in Writ Petition No. 2132 of 2009, which was decided on 08 th March, 2010. One of the relief claimed by the Petitioner is to set aside the said order and hear the writ petition afresh. That relief is entirely misconceived. Insofar as the said relief is concerned, according to the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the Petitioner would be content if notices were to be issued to Respondent 2 43 wp.1549.10 No.1, who in turn, would explain the relevant position stated in the petition. We see no propriety in acceding to this request. In our opinion, the Petitioner is free to pursue the private complaint filed against Respondent No.1 before the Magistrate Court, at Kurla. That will be decided on its own merits. In our opinion, the present petition is ill- advised, the same is disposed of accordingly. [ U.D. SALVI, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]