1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2500 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 330 OF 2009 Dr.Ravindra Rangrao Mistry Applicant Versus Shital Subhash Jain Respondent Mrs.S.T.Kazi , advocate for the applicant. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 14th July, 2009. P.C.: Heard Mrs.Kazi, learned Counsel for the applicant. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 21 days occurred in presenting appeal against the order of acquittal recorded by Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Dhule in S.T.C.C. No.78/2003 on 05.03.2008. In spite of issuance of notice, none appears for Respondent, though served. Considering the reasons set out in the application, application deserves to be allowed and is accordingly allowed. Delay of 21 days occurred in presenting the appeal stands condoned. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/criappln2500.08 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2501 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 330 OF 2009 Dr.Ravindra Rangrao Mistry Applicant Versus Shital Subhash Jain Respondent Mrs.S.T.Kazi , advocate for the applicant. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 14th July, 2009. P.C.: Heard Mrs.Kazi, learned Counsel for the applicant. None appears for the Respondent, though served. Leave to file appeal is granted. Application stands disposed of. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/criappln2500.08 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 330 OF 2009 Dr.Ravindra Rangrao Mistry Appellant Versus Shital Subhash Jain Respondent Mrs.S.T.Kazi , advocate for the appellant. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 14th July, 2009. P.C.: Heard Mrs.Kazi, learned Counsel for the appellant. None appears for the Respondent, though served. Appeal is admitted. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/criappln2500.08