IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Rev.(T) No. 49 of 2008. Decided on: 28th October, 2010. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Petitioners. -Versus- Jai Krishan. …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the respondent. : Mr. Hem Raj Bhardwaj, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal after coming to the conclusion that the workman had completed 240 days preceding his termination, had ordered his re-engagement. There is no error apparent on the face of record in the judgment dated 22nd May, 2000. Consequently, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 28, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?