IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2007 / 28TH PAUSHA 1928 WP(C).No. 1317 of 2007(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SUSEELA ANILKUMAR, W/O. ANILKUMAR, AGED 37, KADAVAMTHURUTHIL, MANGARAM, KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANILAL SRI.M.K.SUBHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KONNI POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA. 3. KRISHNA PILLAI,MELETHIL CHITS AND FINANCES, PUTHENPEEDIKA, KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA. 4. LINESH,THULASI MANDIRAM, MANGARAM, KONNI. 5. VISWAN, SREEKRISHNA JEWELLERY, PATHANAMTHITTA. 6. RAJU,CHUTTIPPARA VADAKKE CHARUVIL, KUMBAZHA, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY G.P.SRI.P.A.SALIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C)NO.1317/2007 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE ADVERTISEMENT IN THE NEWSPAPER – MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY DT. 16.12.06. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2(a): TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR THE RECEIPT OF THE COMPLAINT. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. // TRUE COPY // TKS J.B.KOSHY & K.P.BALACHANDRAN,JJ. -------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.1317 OF 2007 -------------------------------------------------------- Dated 18th January, 2007 JUDGMENT Koshy,J . This is a petition for police protection to the lives of the petitioner and her family members and also to run the Computer Centre and Educational Institution conducted by her. Counsel for respondents 3 to 6 submitted that the petitioner borrowed money and issued a cheque which is not in her account and a police complaint has been filed. But, that will not mean that they can attack the petitioner's establishment. It is stated that the respondents are not attacking the petitioner or her establishment. Therefore, interim protection granted on 11.1.2007 is confirmed without prejudice to the rights of the respondents 3 to 6 in taking legal action against the petitioner if they are cheated. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. J.B.KOSHY JUDGE K.P.BALACHANDRAN JUDGE tks