HtGHCOURTOFCHHATTBGAfWATBttJ^PUR DIVISIONBENCH CORAM: APPLICANT RESPONDENTS HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. & HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUIVUtfl SINHA, J. M.C^.No.83of20<»5 l^iustol Prasad Swamfcar, S/o Late Lawnai PrEsad Sao, Aged about 62 years, R/o Sadar Bazar, Durg (C.G.) Versus 1. State of ChhaUfsgarh, through Chief Secr^ary, Office situated ert Secr^arirt Raipur (C.G.) 2. Secrelary, Lsnw | & Leystedve Worte Department, ;OfRce sltuated at Secretariat, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Deputy Secretary, Law and b^islattve Wori®De|M»tment, Office sitiKrted EA Secretanat,Raipur(C.G.) 4. District & Sessjons Judge, Durg (C.G.) ADplication for Restoration ofthe Writ PetitJOR No.4't5OT!0®4 Present: Shri B. Nag, counsel on behalf <rf Shri N.S. Dhurandhar, counsel fbr the petlttoner. Shri SumeshBag4, Govt. Advocate forthe State/ respondents No; 1,2 and3. ©RDER (251hSepta^CT,2(M»8) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, CJ. Shri B. Nag, teamed eounsel for th®prtBloner ^ete permission to withdraw the petttton, as the same, now, has becomeinfructuous. '2. Permission granted. 3. , The petitlon, therefore, 1s dismissed as vrithdrawn. 4. With the above order, LA. No.2909/2005 atso steinds dlsposed of. ^—^:f~~-—^-Q_^ Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- Chief JiisUce N^