IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 27528 of 2007 Between: 1 D.Chitralekha, w/o D.Bheem Rao, R/o Neegal Village, Devadurg Taluq, Raichur District, Karnataka State. 2 D.Krishna, S/o D.Bheem Rao, 3 D.Venkob Rao, s/o D.Balappa Swamy, 4 D.Pavan Kumar, S/o D.Bheem Rao, 5 Smt.D.Padma, W/o D.Bheem Rao, (P2 to P5 are R/o III 2 RT, Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar, Hyderabad.). 6 Sangappa, S/o late Bheemsha, R/o Neegal Village, Devadurg Taluq, Raichur District, Karnatka State. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Sub-Registrar, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The District Registrar, Ranga reddy District, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in not accepting the documents/sale deeds for registration in respect of thelands in Sy.No.274/1 of Qutubullapur Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as arbitrary, illegal, violative of Art.14, 12 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities to accept the documents/sale deeds submitted by the petitioners for registration in respect of thelands in Sy.No.274/1 of Quthbullapur Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and pass suchother order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit andproper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.SUDERSHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 27528 of 2007 Order: Questioning the action of the respondents in refusing to receive and register the documents presented by the petitioners in respect of the land in Survey No.274/1 situated at Qutbullapur village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, the petitioners filed the present writ petition. A counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the respondents. Reiterating the counter averments, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submitted that the petitioners have not presented any document before the respondents for registration. He, however, submitted that if the petitioners approach the respondents, they would certainly receive the documents to be presented by the petitioners for registration. In view of the above stand taken by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: The respondents are directed to receive and process the documents to be presented by the petitioners for registration in respect of the lands in question, and register the same, if the same are otherwise in order. In the event, if there are any objections for registering the said documents, it is open for the respondents to make an endorsement to that effect, record reasons and communicate the same to the petitioners. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 03.07.2008 Nsr