IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2010 / 21ST ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 31347 of 2010(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- ABDUL SALIM, 'LATHIF MANZIL', CHEMMANTHUR , PUNALUR., BY ADV. SRI.C.S.DIAS SRI.N.K.SUBRAMANIAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR,KOLLAM-691 001. 2. UMMAN SAMUEL,S/O.UMMAN, KANDAMTH HOUSE,CHEMMANNTHUR,PUNALUR MUNICIPALITY, PUNALUR VILLAGE 691 305 3. SONY,S/O.KUNHUMON,KNADAMTH HOUSE, PUNALUR MUNICIPALITY,PUNALUR VILLAGE 691 305. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 31347 OF 2010 (P) ===================== Dated this the 13th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T The complaint of the petitioner is that despite having filed Ext.P1 alleging unauthorised reclamation by respondents 2 and 3, 1st respondent has not taken any action on the complaint. Endorsement on Ext.P1 complaint shows that, on receipt of the said complaint, the District Collector had called for certain reports. 2. Therefore, if as stated by the petitioner, the said complaint has been received and reports have been called for, 1st respondent ought to have concluded further proceedings. 3. Having regard to the allegation that no further action has been taken, it is directed that on the production of a copy of this judgment, 1st respondent shall conclude the proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 with notice to affected parties and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks thereafter. Petitioner to produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the District Collector for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp