IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7183 OF 2008 Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Kamgar Union ..Petitioners versus Nashik District Security Guards Board & Anr. ..Respondents Ms. Ranjana Todankar for Petitioners. Ms. Lata Desai for Respondent No. 1. Mr. Nikhil Sakhardande with Mr. Nikhil S. Darale i/b. Udwadia & Udeshi for Respondent No. 2. CORAM : D. D. SINHA & A. A. SAYED , JJ. DATED : JANUARY 20, 2010. P.C. : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and the learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. 2. In the present petition the petitioner is seeking a direction to respondent No. 1 to take action against respondent No. 2 as per the provisions of Clause 42 of The Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Scheme, 2002, as well as direction to respondent no. 1 Board to allot the work to the security guards listed as per the document annexed at Exhibit ‘A’ to the petition. 3. The learned counsel for the respondent No.1 states that respondent No. 1 will look into the matter and consider the issue on its own merits and after granting opportunity of hearing to the respondent No.2 take appropriate steps in accordance with law taking into consideration the provisions of Clause 42 of the Scheme of 2002. 4. The learned counsel further states that the issue of grant of work to the security guards also will be considered and decided. 5. In the back-drop of the above referred fact, nothing more is required to be done in the petition. At the same time, the grievance of the petitioner in view of the said statement, in our view, will be taken care of. Hence, we dispose of the writ petition accordingly. Sd/- (D. D. SINHA, J.) Sd/- ( A. A. SAYED, J.)