) f5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. ’CHHA‘ITISGARH / WRIT PETITION No. 4’ ”fgvoF 2004 Manish Yadav, aged about 28 years, I Raipur (Chhattisgarh) PETITIONER / S/o gishwambhar Yadav, resident of Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Urban Devefopment and Administration, D. K. S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Riapur (Chhattisgarh) .‘Municipai Corporation, Raipur through its Commissioner, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) . Mr. Arun Kumar Singhaniya, Ganj Para, Raipur (Chh/attisgarh) é), WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/226/OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / ak $ e a Hi$H CGURT OF CHHJRTT¥$G RH AT S§LA$PLIR E7 V WRYT PETETIGN NQ. M3 $F 2Q04 Efketitiomru Mamas?! Yadav \ler5u3 Resnondems State of ‘Chhaitiwam 8: Sinners WRET PETH‘mN UNDER ARTECILE 226i22? GF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF INDIA ISB : Hon’ble Nit 3aii$h K Agnimm, .5.} Pmsem :- $hr‘: San;ay K. Agrawa£ with 8m Sudeep Agrawai, ladvocateS for ihe pemicner. $hré Shas’nank Thakur, Pamel Lawy$r for ihe $tatei {espom‘em No.1. Shré Kashif ShakeeL Advocate far the respondem Nu2. Shri Bha$kar Paywh Advocate for the respsndent No.3. GRIE'ER mRALE {Pausaed cm 2? 5‘ day 6f september, 2G1 G) warned counsei appearing for tha petiiioneaz $ubmits that with the passage of time, the petmcm has become infrucmous. Learned nounsel appearing for otheir side do not contmvert tho above submi'soionh 3. m View of the above. iho wrii oetition is dismisoed, as having become infructuoue‘ \ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge d) \