IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2618 OF 2007 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.466 OF 2004 IN AWARD NO.9 OF 2004 IN ARBITRATION REFERENCE NO.180 OF 2003 Akhil K. Dalal ....Petitioner V/s. M/s.Jaico Investments ....Respondent Ms.Kanchan Chindarkar i/b Mr.S.R. Mishra for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- 1. It appears that there was some negligence on the part of the Petitioner’s advocate resulting in his not appearing on the day on which the Chamber Summons was dismissed. The Chamber Summons that was dismissed sought a refund of the amounts deposited by the Petitioner as a result of the Petition having been allowed. 2. In the circumstances, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer (a). 3. The Notice of Motion is accordingly disposed of.