R.S.A. No. 1015 of 2011 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. R.S.A. No. 1015 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 15, 2011 Joginder Kumar …..Appellant Vs. Rajinder Kumar and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. Vineet Chaudhary, Advocate for the appellant. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Suit of the plaintiff- appellant for permanent injunction against his brothers defendant- respondents to restrain them to interfere in the possession of the property ‘ABCDEFGHIJKL’ mentioned in the heading of the plaint and depicted in site plan Ex.P1 stands dismissed by the Courts below, holding that the plaintiff is neither owner nor in possession of the property in dispute. R.S.A. No. 1015 of 2011 (O&M) [2] Counsel for the appellant has vehemently contended that the site plan has been admitted by DW1 and that the existence of tress on the area ‘GHIO’ stands established as such the injunction should have been granted to the plaintiff- appellant. I have heard counsel for the appellant and gone through the judgments of the Courts below. The dispute is inter-se the real brothers over a family property. The Courts below have held, while deciding issue No.1, that the plea of family settlement taken by the plaintiff- appellant is vague and that he is neither the owner nor in possession of the land in dispute. There is no substantial question of law involved in the appeal. Dismissed. March 15, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE