IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 26TH JULY 2011 / 4TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 19659 of 2011(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- CHATHAMKULAM FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST, CHANDRANAGAR BYE PASS, PALAKKAD-7 REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN C.R. BHAVADAS, CHATHAMKULAM HOUSE, KONGAD, PALAKKAD BY ADV. SRI.KURIAN GEORGE KANNANTHANAM, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN SMT.P.G.BABITHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, THENHIPALAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DIST. - 676 505 2. THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, THENHIPALAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DIST. 676 505 3. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, THENHIPALAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DIST. 676 505 ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW,SC,CALICUTY UNIVERS FOR R1 TO 3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).19659/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE EXPERT TEAM OF THE AICTE EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE PRINT OUT OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED ON THE WEB SITE OF THE AICTE EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE PAY ORDER SHOWING THE PAYMENT TO THE AICTE EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR AFFILIATION SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY EXT.P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.6.2011 IN W.P.(C).16588/2011 EXT.P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENTS DATED 5.7.11 (TRUE COPY) P.A TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).19659/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 26th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner Trust has decided to commence MBA course in their College and for that purpose, they made an application to the respondent University for affiliation. By Ext.P6, they were asked to rectify certain defects pointed out by the University and it is aggrieved by Ex.P6, this writ petition is filed. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University was heard. According to the learned Standing Counsel, in compliance with the directions of this Court in Ext.P5 judgment, petitioner has not so far produced letter of approval issued by the AICTE. It is also submitted that if the petitioner files their objections to Ext.P6, inspection will be conducted and application made by the petitioner for affiliation will be reconsidered on an expeditious basis. W.P.(C).19659/2011 2 3. In the light of the submission so made, I do not think that it is necessary for this Court to go into the merits of the controversy. Therefore, I direct that it will be open to the petitioner to submit the letter of approval issued by the AICTE along with their objections to Ext.P6. Thereafter, University will conduct inspection of the petitioner's Institution and reconsider the application made by the petitioner for affiliation, which process shall be completed at any rate, within four weeks from the date of production of the aforesaid documents along with a copy of this judgment. 4. It is made clear that while reconsidering the matter as above, University shall duly advert to Ext.P1 inspection report of the AICTE. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs