IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH TA No.354 of 2011 Date of decision : 19.12.2011 Gurdeep Kaur ...Applicant Versus Sukhwinder Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent. JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. (Oral) 1. The present application has been preferred by the applicant- wife, under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying for the transfer of the petition titled as ‘Sukhwinder Singh Vs. Gurdeep Kaur’, filed by the respondent under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, (for short `the Act') from the Court of learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Patiala, to the Court of competent jurisdiction at SAS Nagar. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Reply filed on behalf of the respondent is taken on record. 4. The allegations raised in the application are that of demand of dowry and cruelty against the applicant. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that before the Women Cell as well as the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, the respondent has in unequivocal terms stated that the applicant herself left the matrimonial home at her own free well. The respondent is ready and willing to take the applicant back. 5. The learned counsel for the respondent refers to Annexure R-2 filed along with the reply, wherein no substance was found in the allegations raised by the applicant. The respondent has even given an undertaking to the effect that he is ready to have a separate rented accommodation in case the applicant joins him. 6. In this view of the matter, the present application is without any merit and the same is hereby dismissed. 19.12.2011 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) atulsethi JUDGE