IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31169 of 2009 SHAILENDRA KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 14.09.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 420, 406 and 409/34 of the Penal Code. Allegation is that the informant was insured under Agricultural insurance Scheme on payment of certain amount. The compensatory amount to the tune of Rs. 11,445/- was to be paid. On demand a cheque was issued for the said amount but only Rs. 7,000/- was paid. Informant is member of the PACCS whereas the petitioner is the Chairman of the PACCS. It is contended that the present case has been lodged without any verification of the facts with a view to malign his political career. It is next contended that the rest of the amount 4,445/- has already been credited in the account of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner drew attention of this court to the statement of the learned APP which appears on page 1 bottom paragraph of the impugned order. It appears that petitioner is in custody since 4.06.2009. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of the SDJM Sikrahna at Motihari Dist East Champaran in connection with Pakrideyal P.S. Case no. 38/09, subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioner. It is made clear that once the trial of the petitioner reaches up to the level of framing of the charge, petitioner shall appear before the court below as and when called upon and shall cooperate in trial. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)