IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. WRIT PETITION NO.840 OF 2004 (M/S). Chanchal Singh. …. Petitioner. Versus State of Uttaranchal & others. …. Respondents. HON’BLE RAJESH TANDON, J. By the present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to mention the area of plot No. 64 (Majhola Bagh) mentioned at serial No.11 of the auction notice. The grievance of the petitioner is that in the year 19970 he was granted a least for plot Nos. 63/1, 63/2, 63/3 and 63/4 total area 13 bighas but the lease was cancelled in the year 1980-81 and thereafter the petitioner could not success. The grievance of the petitioner is that auction is going to take place and it has not specified with regard to the plot number. Counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer only that he will make a representation to the respondent in this regard and the respondent may dispose it of his representation. The respondent No.3 is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner. Subject to the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Dated: 13.09.2004. (Rajesh Tandon J) S.S.Negi.