i .WnfPct!t|onISlNo,34J.j tianu agea os years Purshottam lal, Assistant 'acher, Primary Schooi, indawani Tah. Zand Distt. Rajnandgaon. Versus (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitutlon of Indi-a) _dUStJCS i3resent : Shri Shri respond int Verma Dubev,P forthe petitioner Lawyer for the State/ i, 20U7; The question of law involved herein is as to whether the fsetitloner is to regular pay scale w.e.f. the of initia! appointment or from the date of compietion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as we!! as for Uie State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of !aw invoived In the present writ petitlon are the same as to that of in W.P. (S) No.3486 of 2005 (Ganpat Ram Kunjam Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & others), whlch was of vide order nnn7 ^ >A.uy? . 3. in visw of the above submissions mad'e by leamed counse! for the parties, the writ petltion is aliowed 'm the same terms. No or. s fn '*.'"' ii tta- tu w 'RdU Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Resfiondents 1. State Government of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Sohool Education Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) |