..,-^K1 / -?'vf ^ ^< 1 •• ^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S.) N0. ^.^13/2010 PETITIONERS ^ *«^1 ^}-^^ -^'"^c^ ^•^:/-??^! 1) Khagpati Pawar S/o Late Budhram Pawar, Aged about 42 years, Occupation Service (Chowkidar) presently posted as Narayanpur Jan Shakti Niyoj'an Vibhag Mahila I.T. I. Narayanpur, Bastar (C.G.) 2) Cham^tr Singh Pradhan S/o Late Sukuram Pradhan, Aged about 43 years, Occupation Service (Peon) presently posted as Narayanpur Jan Shakti Niyojan Vibhag Mahila I.T.I. Narayanpur, Bastar (C.G.) 3) Narsingh Markam S/o Shri Lalu Ram Markam, Aged about 49 years, Occupation Service (Peon) presently posted as Narayanpur Jan Shakti Niyojan Vibhag Mahila I.T.I. Narayanpur, Bastar (C.G.) 4) Smt. Champavatii0/o Banshi Lal Nag, Aged about 40 years, Occupation Service (Peon cum cook man) presently posted as Narayanpur Jan Shakti Niyojan Vibhag Mahila I.T. I. Narayanpur, Bastar (C.G.) RESPONDENTS : ^' VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretaiy Jan Shakti Niyojan Vibahg D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) s 3. Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department Bastar District Bastar (C.G.) 4. The Superintendent office of Women Industrial Training Institute Narayanpur, Bastar District Narayan (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^¥l'^T'fe^N> mi^nt^^qpi Praveen ~5^ ^8^!<rl4, Wtw^ ?^<V1J^^< ,...^.^..cs;....^./..^.?.....^200 -^T^^-H^^- <A^ i^rw^fft^^it?r SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Moban Shrivastava, J. 21.6.2010 Shri Somkant Verma, couhsel Shri V.V.S. Murhty, Dy.| Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the Statej/respondents Heard. Submission of learned pursuant to Regularization issued in view of the guidelines case of Secretary, State of jcounsel for the petitioners is that p^licy dated 5.3.2008 (Annexure P-3), laid down by the Supreme Court in the Klarnataka & Ors. Vs. Umadevi (3t & Ors.. 2006 (41 SCC 1, repres regularization, but the same ha; Learned counsel for th representation has been preferr With the aforesaid obserji off. '^Fsfemh ^i^f "^ fe^ TN'^K ^^H^i^r for the petitioners. Advocate General along with Smita entation has been preferred claiming not been decided so far. respondents submits that if such ?d, the same shall be decided. /ation, the petition is flnally disposed Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^TRT^U ^NN'^TT^^ <R^f<^t4—FS.'H7—2/2010—1,00,000.