IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.6976 of 1988 (O&M) Date of Decision:29.11.2010. Babu Ram ....Petitioner Versus The Superintending Canal Officer and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: None for the petitioner. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G. Punjab, for respondents No.1 and 2 – State. None for respondent No.3. Mr. S.K. Bawa, Advocate, for respondent No.4. NAWAB SINGH.J (ORAL) Challenge is to the order dated August 24th, 1987 (Annexure P/3) passed by Superintending Canal Officer, Patiala Circle, I.B. Patiala, whereby, on the report of Ziledar and the scheme of the Consolidation of Holdings , he directed that the Watercourse- 'ED' (No.542) on the southern side of Rectangle 38/3-2 & 4, be adopted. 2 Since the Watercourse was provided in view the report of Ziledar and earmarked by the Consolidation authorities, this Court is of the opinion that the impugned order, (Annexure P/3) is perfectly valid and justified and warrants no interference. 3 Dismissed. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 29.11.2010. som