IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22185 of 1999 Between: D. Sanjeevappa … Petitioner AND Transmission Corporation Limited of A.P., Vidyuth Soudha, Hyderabad, rep., by its Director (D & HRD) & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Smt. S. Laxmi Prameela for Sri P. Sreenivasulu This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22185 of 1999 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… … Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the claim of the petitioner for the post of Sub-Engineer (Electrical) notified by the respondents herein, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and further order the respondents to consider the claim along with others without insisting his name sponsored for the post Sub-Engineer (Electrical) for which written test to be held on 24.10.1999 or any subsequent date in accordance with his claim, eligibility, suitability in force and pass such other order or orders, as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.” At the hearing, Smt. S. Laxmi Prameela representing Sri P. Sreenivasulu, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as infurctuous, WPMP.No.27761 of 1999 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 17.12.2008 ES