“9 GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (Under Article 227) No. 3182/2009 PETITIONERS 1] Anusuiya Bai W / o Bhanu Respondent No. 1 to 7 Kashyap, aged about 55 years, R/o Station Road, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (CG) 2] Smt. Kesari Chandrakar W/o Devsharan, 3] Vijay Kumar, S/o Chandrakar, 4] Basant Kumar, S/o Ramdhan Chandrakar, Rekha Chandrakar, D / o Ramdhan Chandrakar, Ramdhan 6] Mamta Chandrakar, D / o Ramdhan Chandrakar Chanchal Chandrakar, Ramdhan Chandrakar VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1 ] APPLICANT D/o All above petitioner no. 2 to 7 are R/o Village Bawankera, Tahsil 85 District Mahasamund (CG) Smt. Ahilya Bai Chandrakar, W/o Late Babulal Chandrakar, R/o Bawankera, Tahsil 85 District Mahasamund (CG) 2] Smt. Bhanurambha Chandrakar, W/o Mahendra Chandrakar, R/o Village Bawankera, Tahsil & District Mahasamund (CG) ...Respondent/respondent no. 8 3] State of Chhattisgarh through Collector, Mahasamund (CG) ...Respondent/respondent no. 9 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:— Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate for the respondents No. 1 81. 2. v Ms. Sangeeta M’ishra, PL. for the State/respondent No. 3. ORDER (Passed on 31/ 10/2011) By this petition under Article 227 of the Con“s’titution of India petitioners have Challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 6/3/2009 passed by Board of Revenue, Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur (Circuit Court, Raipur) in Revision Revenue Case No. RN/12/RA—27/238/2007 reversing the order dated 22/1/2007 passed by Additiona Collector, Mahasamund in Revenue Case No. l HI m 06—A—27/2006—07 whereby Additional Collector, Mahasamund has affirmed the order dated 28/3/2006 passed by Naib Tehsildar, Jhalap in Revenue Case No. O4/A—27/Year 2004—05. 2. Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for the petitioners, Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate for the respondents Nor 1 81, 2 and Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, P.L. for the State/respondent No. 3 are heard. 3. During course of arguments, learned counsels for the petitioners and respondents No. 1 8r, 2 submits that civil suit has been decided between parties vide judgment 8r, decree dated 19/1/2011 passed by First Civil Judge, Class—I, Mahasarnund in civil suit No. 51— A/2009 and appeal is pending against said judgment 85 decree, in these circumstances, I do not find any scope for interference, with these observations, petition stands disposed of. No order as to 4. Interim application stands disposed of. T.P Shanna Judge m