•^ APPLICANTS PLAINTIFFS ^y^'/' _<^-2 -y AJ ^J.^^v ^^.r. ^ 'p" ^/ T /'y^"' %^ <:-' 'J- -^' /•• .•f' ^ <\^ IN THE mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR M.C.C.NO. 2-co /2009 INCWILREVISIONNO. 1529/1997 ^ 7. fe..} X 8. Sk Sukhnath, S/o- Lekhanram Kohta, Agedabbut42years, Service, R/o-Village-Kondagaon, Post- Kondagaon, Distt. Bastar, M.P. (Now C.G.) Shambhunath, S/o-Lekhanram Kostha, Agedabout 30 years, R/o- Village- Kondagaon, Post & Tehsil-Kondagaon, Distt. Bastar. LaUta Bai, Wd/o- Lekhanram, Aged about66 years, Caste-Koshta (Died); Ratiubai, W/o- Roopsing Koshta, Aged about 46 years, R/o- Village, Jagdalpur, Tehsil-Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar, M.P. (Now C.G.) pied) Manki Bai, W/o- Meghnath Koshta, Aged about 41 years, R/o- VUlage- Kondagaon, Tehsil-Kondagaon, Distt. Bastar, (MP) CNow C.G.) Shanti Bai, W/o- Lazman Koshta, Aged about 34 years, Farmer, R/o- ViUage-Kondagaori, Tehsil- Kondagaon, Distt. Bastar, Ku. Krantibai, Daughter ofLaxman K.oshta, Agedabout 27 years, Farmer, R/o-Village-Kondagaon,Tehsil- Kondagaon,Distt. Bastar. Amti Bai,W/o-GaneshKoshta, Aged about 24 years, R/o- Village- NarayaiipuT, Distt. Bastar (MP) (Now * CG) -^ ?* VERSUS RESPONDENTS DEFENDANTS : 1. Ganeshram,W/o-Ramsingh, Caste Koshta, Aged about 50 years, Teacher m Education Department. 2. Mohan Singh, S/o-Maugalram Koshta, Agedabout43 years, Farmer. 3. Sukhmam Bai, W/o- Marilal Koshta, Aged about 41 years, Fanner. No. 1 to 3 are R/o- Village/Post-Kondagaon, Tehsil-Kondagaon, Distriet-Bastar, (M.P.) (Now C.G.) 4. Premsmgh,S/o-Mangatram Koshta, Aged about 38 years, Service (State Bank of Jagdalpur) R/o- viUage- Jagdapur, Distt. Bastar. 5. State ofM.P. Through-Collector,\ Bastar, Place Jagdapur, Bastar (MP) (Now C.G.) APPLICATIONFOR.RESTORATION OF THE CIVIL REVISION N0.1529/1997 DISMISSEDVIDEORDERDATED 27.06.2005 FOR WANT OF PROSEGUTION sn^i w ft-ii'* wn aiii^i aiilii ^ -\ ^- *1WC(T tt>*l|th TSE[ •^l''ll<r)'4, »T)I<H'IS, fsiciiyy ").^.C7-K5- 2-o&/°3 ^^....A^..^...^.^..^........^........-....^200 sn^i tra^ (fitsi't?) '^TIW^'fT 3i1^T SB: HON'BLESHM JUSTICd 17-6-aQ(» Shri Vwek Shrivastava, Shri Anand Shukla, A^v., appears on behalf of fhe Shri Pa&kaj Shrivastava, Advocate [for tfae non-appUcants No. 1 to 4. Ku. Saageeta Mishra, P^nel Lawycr, for fhe State. Instant applk-atiou has restoration ofCinl Revision N ^een preferred by fhe appUcaats fbr t>. 1529/1997, which w^ dismissed restored. Shri Shulda, respondents No. 1 to 4 does u()t object the above prayer. On due consBieration, Revision No. 1529/1997 is res|tored to its or^iaal ni.unber. Let a copy of fhis order No. 1529/1^7. 'bwld'fl'l *114<fl 'if ft^t <I^<<1< ^siRiH sii^i N.K.AGARWAL Advocate, for the applicants. vide order dated 2-4-2009 for|eFant ofprosecution. Shri Shrivastava submijts that name of appUcaats' counsel was not pubUshed iu fhe dait^ cause Ust, so the counscl'was not aware about listtag offhe cas^. He prays fhat the ciwl revision bc leame^i coiuisel appearing for the the appUcation is aUowed. Civfl 1pe piaced ia the file of Civfl. Revision Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge