IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4097 of 2009 Date of Decision: March 17, 2009 Parlhad Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Navin Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) It has been brought out that tentative list of zones and voters for election to Board of Directors of Sirsa Central Cooperative Bank was circulated wherefor objections were invited. The objections were required to be filed by 18.2.2009. It has been pleaded that the petitioner filed objections on 18.2.2009. Without taking any decision on the objections, the zones and voters list has been finalised. I have considered the contention of learned counsel, in the context of the pleadings. Annexure P-1, as placed before this Court, does not indicate anywhere that objections were to be filed by 18.2.2009. CWP No.4097 of 2009 [2] Annexure P-2, purportedly dated 18.2.2009 as pleaded by the learned counsel, were the objections on which no decision has been taken. Contents of Annexure P-2, however, make it evident that it could not have been filed on 18.2.2009 in view of the contents. The relevant portion which makes it evident that the document, Annexure P-2, was not filed on 18.2.2009, reads as under:- “The Manager of the Cooperative Bank had presents the Zonal List for different zones the officials had sought the objections by 18.2.2009 and the Zonal Committee had to take its decision by 19.2.2009. I had given my objection on 18.2.2009 regarding the Zone no.8 had objected regarding its objection. I reached the office at 10.00 A.M of the Cooperative Bank Sirsa and I appeared before the Zonal Committee regarding the above matter, but I was not heard and I was told to go out as the appropriate decision will be taken on my objections. Any decision taken on my objection I was not disclosed about this and nor any zonal list or the electrol role was displayed any office. The meeting of the Zonal Committee was held in a room which was headed by some persons which is totaly unconstitutional.” [SIC] Obviously, the document came into existence after 19.2.2009. The petition is dismissed. The petitioner would be at liberty to file a fresh petition with correct copies of documents and after laying proper foundation of the facts of the case. (AJAI LAMBA) March 17, 2009 JUDGE avin