PETITIOMBR o. IM THE HIGH GOURT O? 3UOICSXUK.E GF CHHATTISGA{EH:BILASPHR Writ Petition Ne. 2^'^t 72004. jt.BSPONB£»TS s Purustaettam SaFathi s/o late Shri Gaagaram sacath.t, aged about 20 years, R/o village seoni, Tahsil Chan(>a liistt. Janjgir-caiampa (C.s.) V er s u s s 1. State of C.G. Ttirougfa s Seeretary, /^r^ Bepartment of Water Resources, 0^^ ; .< • ;^ ^^•:?-L..• /•' ...•••"ri^^- .^^ cS^ '^ 0-r O.K.S. Bbawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Cta.tef Qigineer, Hasdee-Bango Project, Bil.aspar (C.G.) 3. Exeeutive Engineer Mini Mata Bango Canal Division No.5, Kharsia (C.G.) ifc' '''?-,. •-'.^ '•••^ ,'"" '-, ^v\ WRIT PBTITION HNSBi ARTICLE 226/227 OS' CONSTrTUTION OF E^SL^^is^-' mOH CODRT OF JUDICATURE CHHAmSGARH : BILASFUR 8IMGLBBBNCH : HOITBUB 8HRI 8ATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION N0. 2041 of2004 Petitioner Respondents Versus Purushottaia Sarathi State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Shri A. N, Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Suinit Venaa, Panel lawyer for fhe respondents/State. • ORAL ORDBR (4*h May, 2006) 1. Leamed counsel for the petitioner subinits that the petitioner is the son of Shri Gangaram, who was workiag as Chowfcidar (Class-IV) m fhe office of the Respondent No. 3/Executive Engineer, Mini Mata Baago Canal, Division No. 5, Khareia. Shri Gangaram. was died in haraess on 13.12.2002 2. The petitioner, beiag one of fhe dependant-legal heirs of ttie deceased ffled an application oa 20.5.2003 for coiapassionate appointiaent before the Executive Engiaeer/respondent No. 3. Accorduig to learaed counsel for the petitioner, the case was not cousidered on fhe ground fhat the petitioner had not coinpleted 10 yeara of semce as regular eiaployee. Leamed counsel for the petitioner has pointed out the circular dated 20.9.2005 (Annexure P/7), wherein fhere is no condition of working as 10 yeare on regular basis 3. The State Govenunent is dirccted to consider the case of the petitioner as per its own circiLlar dated 2.2.2006 and also ni 'FSS-" view of fhe order dated 20.12.2005 passed by this Court ui W.P. No. 1322/2002 and ofher connected matters on its cwn merit, in accordance with law, on such representation being filed by the petitioner. 4. For fhe reasons stated-above, the writ petition stands disposed of. No oider as to costs. Certified copy as per Rules. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur