(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 120 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 120 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 120 OF 2004 Nasir Khan Basheer Khan ...Petitioner Versus Sherbano w/o Abdul Ali Bhai Khemji and others ...Respondents ..... Mr. P.J. Thorat h/f R.A. Thorat, counsel for Petitioner ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 16TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 16TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 16TH FEBRUARY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard Mr. Thorat, the learned counsel for the petitioner. There is no material even prima facie to accept that the alleged transfer of tenancy or surrender of the same was made by the present respondent No.1 in favour of respondent No.4 after the order of status-quo was passed by this Court on 7.2.2002 in Civil Application No. 1654 of 2001 filed in writ petition No. 3138 of 2000 and therefore, no cognizance of the alleged contempt can be taken at this stage. 2. Hence, the contempt petition is rejected summarily.