1 20.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.20 OF 2011 Rajdev Steel (India) ...Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Subhash Jha i/b M/s.Law Global for Petitioner. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for State. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- FEBRUARY 3, 2011. P.C. 1. After hearing Counsel for the parties for some time, in deference to the observations made by the Court, it is prayed that the petitioner be allowed to withdraw this Petition with liberty to pursue the matter before the Magistrate’s Court including the application preferred before the Magistrate Exhibit `G’. Since the Police Officer has submitted report to the concerned Magistrate, all questions arising in relation to the said report including the objections raised by the petitioner in application dated 10th March, 2010 will have to be dealt with by the concerned Magistrate. The same are left open to be answered on its own merits in accordance with law. The Magistrate may dispose of pending report of the Police Officer as well 2 20.11 as the Application Exhibit G filed by the petitioner expeditiously. All questions are left open. 2. Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner on the above terms. (A.R.JOSHI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)