W.P. No. 533 (SS) of 2009 Hon’ble J.C. S. Rawat, J. Mr. N.S. Negi, Advocate vice Mr. T.S. Rautela, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Brief Holder for the State/respondents. Mr. Manoj Tiwari, Senior Advocate for the intervener. Learned Brief Holder for the State raised an objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy before the Public Service Tribunal, as such, the writ petition cannot be entertained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and the petitioner should have first approached to the Tribunal. The detailed reasons have been assigned by he Division Bench of this Court in Bhuvan Chandra Pandey Vs. State passed in Writ Petition No. 630 of 2006 (S/S) and Nanda Ballabh Pant Vs. State passed in Writ Petition No.257/2005 (S/B). In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to seeks the appropriate remedy in the appropriate Tribunal. Permission granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above liberty. Hoverer, the Tribunal while computing the period of limitation to entertain such petition to be filed by the petitioner will consider the time spent in prosecuting this writ petition in this court. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the certified copy of the orders annexed with this petition be returned to him so that he may annex them in a fresh petition. The prayer is allowed. The petitioner is directed to supply the photocopy of the same in the Registry before taking the aforesaid certified copy. (J.C. S. Rawat, J.) Dated 25.08.2009 LSR