IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.976 of 1994 1. SMT.SEEMA PRASAD WIFE OF SRI DELIP KUMR RESIDING AT 4/92, DHARAM JYOT, JUHU, A-B. NAIR ROAD, JUHU, BOMBAY …………………PETITIONER Versus 1. (A) BASUDEO PRASAD S/O NOT KNOWN (B) ANIL KUMAR S/O BASUDEO PRASAD (C) SUNIL KUMAR S/OI BASUDEO PRASAD (D) PRABHAT KUMAR S/O BASUDEO PRASAD ALL RESIDENT OF BORING CANAL ROAD, P.S.- SHRI KRISHNAPURI, DISTRICT- PATNA (E) DEEPA PRASAD, D/O BASUDEO PRASAD, W/O LALIT KUMAR, SENIOR COMMANDANT, RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, DIESEL LOCOMOTIVE WORKS, VARANASI, UTTAR PRADESH 2. DILIP KUMAR @ RAVI KAUSHAL S/O BASUDEO PRASAD AT PRESENT RESIDING AT SHANTI CHITRA PRADARSHAN, H.C. HOTEL BUILDINGS, EXHIBITION ROAD, PATNA 3. THE SECRETARY, JUHU DHARAM JYOT PREMISES, CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., A-B NAIR ROAD, JUHU, BOMBAY 4. THE JUHU DHARAM JYOT PREMISES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. A-B- NAIR ROAD, JUHU, BOMBAY ……………………………OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite parties :- Mr. M. Prasad, Advocate ------------------ P R E S E N T HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHYAM KISHORE SHARMA Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ & S. K. Sharma, J. Heard the parties. By order dated 13.10.2009 this court granted time to learned counsel for the opposite parties to bring on record the terms of settlement between the parties made out side the court. This was on the basis of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not aware of the terms of settlement to which only her husband was a party. 2 Now the terms of settlement have been produced before us and they show that subject matter of dispute, a Flat bearing No. 4/42 Dharam Jyot A-B- Nair Road, Juhu, Mumbai standing in the name of late Smt. Shanti Lata Prasad has to go to the share of Sri Dilip Kumar the husband of the petitioner. Thus it appears that the subject matter of dispute is included in the joint petition of compromise on behalf of concerned parties filed before the court of Sub-Judge III, Patna in Title Partition Suit No. 338 of 2007. In view of such out of court amicable settlement of this family dispute, this revision application has apparently become infructuous. It is dismissed as such. (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ.) (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) Patna High Court, Patna Dated 7th November, 2009 N.A.F.R/avin