im HIGHCCTJRT ® JUDIGkTURE <»OBATTISSAffi AT BILAS 5 ffRITmiTIQNMt 33) 72005 SINGLE BENGH aaaima^- '^w/ ^w y^/-u .IMiaEamRiB.Mmdaid S/01«rieJhedniamMaadavi Aged39yeas, 00'vt. Hi^er Secondaiy! Purm',T^tt.y^agfCJG^ " j. State of Oihattisga > Through : - Secretary, of school Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, ^ipur <£.G.) 2- The Joint fiirector tok %ikshaB Raipur, Bivision feipur <C.G.) PEHTIWffl^R ARTIOS 2^^7 ^ I1ffi<X»iSTITOTiW WMBlft ffl XI-HC-22 3^^fsvm, srfiwre, fa5iray W^ MS(tb . t^) .\P. \J . \r ULU~u--i-uu--»-^I^—'—' ~ 1 3-4-LJ /? ^a^-sr XI-HC-22 31^1 ?iT f^lwan^T stiHiti ulga 3:^''?raT?PT, yiTflti'l'S, Rlcliyy 3tT^Tq^W . i _ /. ^o;p:^!o."l'2>3l;'Z-°oS' ^ WWtTSBIIth fl^ 200 f^S^ aii^iji ^wiwflfer 6/4/2005 Slui VireudBa Shiama, Advocate for thc Pctitfoner. Shri Sandeep respondcnts^Statc. Heacd. By this petition under ^) India the petitioncr seeks a iacreiaeats and seniorily oa appoiattncnt in thc Ught of State Admmistocative Tribun^l, (HarfeU Chaad Singfa 8s ofliets 31,1.2000. The case of the pedtion^r Diyision Tcacfaer ia fhc Schofrl 1993 on probation fer a perio^ Rs. 1400/- p.m. HoweVer, tenure the petitionerSwas rej regular pay scale. Ofhersmul^ri Adaunistratwe Tnbunal, leamed Tribuiial vide order the same.The petitioaer same treatmcnt as he is Teacher but the respondents fi-infprl +n fflff thi-a pf+i+inn— Dub|sy, Govt. Advocate for the ttic +l<ircl'i(1.( HIHctTyfeiA <.Rl<^K ^SH^HSfI^T Advocate with Slui Y. C. Sliarma, iinulEbi' Jab^dpur da(ied mafl.c aMo |rtic]e 226/227 of the Constitution of ^cction to fhe respondents to pay fhc Ifhe b^is of fhc date of hfe initfal dccision rendcred by tbe feanaed tjaba^nir in O.A.No. 1452/98 V& State of M.P. & others) dated is that he was appointed as Upper >1 Education DcpartBacnt in ttec ycar of two years witti the fixed salary of on after comptetion of two years but he is not being gaveB fhe ^riy situated teachers moved fhe State for regular pay scde, whcroia 31.1.2006 (Annexure P/2) allowed several lepiesentations to accord smulady situated Uppcr Dwraion aot paid auy heed, therefore he is later gtparized Uave XI-HC-22 3:II^T?iT fSawsn^T sfiiwgfer 3^ '<IWI<a<l, ®T(1u'16,fsldlti^ 3ii^i lach __<^/.^.YAO. l33v/Z<n>\- N|i|dTsn*<|tti ••-•---•-••••••••••• •gq-y 200 f^!^""""""•••"•••• /? 3<i^i gwiwofer —t- circuntstaaces readonable. represenlatfQn Lcamed counscl for the | inay be aUpwed to inake a rep^E give similar treatment to thej which have becnsanctfoaed tt) account of llie order of.ty 31.1.2000, to which teamed Having heanl tearned regard to fhc fetcts aad ttus Coiirt thc Innitcd prayc|r petitfoafir .appears to be altowed to make a today to fhe responclent No. I fhe Respondent No.l shaU objcctivc inanncr witfain a such representation, after co^ petitioner aad takiag iato by fhe leamed StateAdm,im^ti and if the petitionerstands in tbc O.A.No. 1452/98 thea) scate and seaiorily. I am told that nuinber Court by the similariy benefits as have been aUowe(| 1452/98mthc8tate pci^od svccdwat oft <t>i<iI<icfliiiici'i^'te^l'tRi+<ii< ^isrf^rsn^r (petitioner subiaits that Itoe petitoncr p^esentation to fhe Respondent No. 1 to «^ petitioner aad tfae same pay scale tb otlier sixiularly situated teachers on State Admiausttative Tnbunal dt. Sfate counsel has no objection. |counsel for fhe paxties and having offhe case, ia thcopuuon of itcjr madc by teatiied counscl fbr the Thcrefore, thc petitioner is •wittun a pcriod oftwo weeks from Iraising all his griievances anri in tum 4ecide the said representation ia au of30 days fipin the date fccript of tsidering aU the poiats raised by the fhe order dated 31.1.2000 passed i^trative Tribunal in O.A.No. 1452/98, the same footiajp, as fhe pctittoners tfac bc alsosanctioncd thc sasmc pay lofpetitipns are toemg fited bcfore tfais situ^ted teachers for aBiswrsag flue samc to the pctitioners who fited O.A.No. Adxium^tra.lwe Tribunal, Jabalpur, as they are \ XI-HC-22 3^ '^WM'H, W^W , KfWVy. 3ll^l^ch__.; <-»>.y.'^M>. \'T,I\I 'i^roS' ^ HIHCfTniHlch W^ 200 Ri*<^ sn^rw f?:iw3n^r i.bliqidfer 3<i^i^kiiwn1?a' »i<i[i-i41-iHiici)'fffelifl <.Rf*di< ^isti^irsn^r with thc order, I would IBa to should considcr that if otticr teft out fhen tifciey shoiild be given the forced to fite such petition on ^ccouut ofnone action-on the partof the RcspdrulentNo.l. Therefore, before partiaajg obscrvc that fhc State Oovcntoea.t sumlariy situated teachers are same treatment '>. Witfa fhe direction afore^ajd, tbc petition stands disposed of SnaDy. Conscqucatty I.A. No. 25^0/2003 also stand disposcd of. Certifed copy as per Rul^s. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge