IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 31ST OCTOBER 2008 / 9TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 32004 of 2008(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MARVIN.P., AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.PONNUMANI, WORKING AS P.D.TEACHER, GOVERNMENT U.P.SCHOOL, PAMBANAR, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.P.P.BIJU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, IDUKKI. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOLLAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.32004/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner is a P.D teacher working in Idukki District. According to the petitioner, he applied for an inter-district transfer to Kollam District and that the application is presently pending before the office of the Deputy Director, Kollam. According to the petitioner, while keeping his application pending some other teachers, who are having claims, which are only inferior to that of his, have been granted inter-district transfer. Thereupon he submitted Ext.P2 representation as well. It is in this background this writ petition is filed. Now that according to the petitioner his application for inter-district transfer is pending consideration of the 2nd respondent, it is for the 2nd respondent to deal with the 2 same. The 2nd respondent shall do so, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within six weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. 3