IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. (S) No‘tQéO /2011 PETITIONER Budheshwar Singh Gond S/ o. Dokri Ram Gond Aged 61 years R/o. Indrasen Nagar, 27 Kholi, Mangla Bilaspur (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENT(S): 1. State of Chhattisgarh ( Through: The Secretary, Department of Panchayat 8b Rural Development, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (CG). 2. The Under Secretary, Department of Panchayat 8a Rural Development, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (CG). 3. The Chief Engineer, Rural Engineering Service O / o. Development Commissioner, Civil Lines, Raipur (CG). , 4. The Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering Service, Division: Bilaspur, Dist: Bilaspur (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA J. l MGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BQLASPUR WRIT PETIT!ON (S) NO. 126D OF 2011 Petitioner Budheshwar Singh Gond Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K‘ Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri N.N.Royt Advocate for the petitioner. shri Y.S.Thakur, Dy. Advocate General for the State/ respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 7m day of March, 201 t) W ashok 1. Learned cbunsei appearing for the petitioner submits that in the light of the circulars dated 304.2008 and 11.1.2010, the petitioner seeks liberty to make representation to the respondent authorities to consider his representation in the light of the above stated circulars. 2. Shri Thakur, learned counsel appearing for the State/ respondents submits that if the representation is made by the petitioner, the same shaii be considered and decided in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of which the representation is being made. 3. in view of the foregoing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing remains for adjudication in this matter. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. " Sdl— .Ag“""° tri SatiShK Judge