T.A. No.559 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH T.A. No.559 of 2010 Date of Decision.13.12.2010 Ranjna Kaur daughter of Shri Piara Singh (wife of Parminder Singh), resident of House No.1122, Sector 10, Panchkula. ......Petitioner Versus Parminder Singh son of Baldev Singh resident of village Mattor, District Mohali ......Respondent Present: Mr. C.L. Pawar, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The application is for transfer of proceedings, which are initiated by the husband at the Court at Mohali. Learned counsel for the applicant-wife contends that an earlier petition filed by the husband at Ropar had been transferred to Panchkula but it was dismissed. The husband has again filed another petition. Learned counsel for the wife also contends that there are proceedings for maintenance which are still pending at Panchkula and she has two minor children. 2. The cause of action for the petition admits that the husband and wife resided together at Mohali and therefore, the petition is filed at Mohali. Mohali and Panchkula are within a radius of 15 kms and the transfer cannot be sought for on the alleged ground of inconvenience when the distance that a person has to travel is very short. The mere T.A. No.559 of 2010 -2- fact that an earlier petition had been directed to be disposed of before the Court at Panchkula will not afford to the applicant a ground to seek for transfer of this petition also to be tried only at Panchkula. 2. The transfer application is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 13, 2010 Pankaj*