IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6809 of 2011 INDERDEO MANJHI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 04.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that seizure list does not disclose this fact that the alleged recovery has been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is contended by him that, as a matter of fact, no recovery has been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner and having more or less similar allegation two co-accused persons have already been granted privilege of bail. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let petitioner, Inderdeo Manjhi, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge NDPS-cum-Sessions Judge, Gaya in Barachatti P.S. Case no. 194/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)