S.B.CR. Misc. IInd Bail Appl. No.3869/2007 (Chandrapal vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of Order :: August 21, 2007 HON'BLE MR. H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.D.K.Gaur,for the petitioner. Mr. Vishal Raj Meha, P.P. for the State. Mr.D.S.Dev, for the complainant. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by counsel appearing for the complainant. Perused the order impugned and the challan papers. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that co- accused Hari Krishan has been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dt. 6.8.2007 and case of the petitioner is not distinguishable from that of co-accused, who has already been granted bail. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that the petitioner and co-accused Manphool Ram were armed with the firearms and they fired gunshot causing gunshot injuries to Promod and Manoj; Manoj was got admitted to the hospital. The admission and discharge as also bed head tickets are on record. While granting bail to co-accused Hari Krishan, the Co-ordinate Bench noticed that injuries alleged to have been inflicted by Shella were simple in nature. In the instant case, the injuries assigned to the present petitioner and Manphool Ram are by gunshot and, therefore, in my view, the case of the petitioner cannot be said to be at par with the case of co-accused Hari Krishan. In the circumstances, therefore, it is not a fit case to grant bail to the petitioner. The second bail application filed by the petitioner under section 439 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. However, it will be open for the petitioner to file a fresh bail application after the statements of two injured persons namely Promod and Manoj are recorded. [H.R.PANWAR],J. m.asif/-