IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40556 of 2009 AJAY KUMAR YADAV . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3. 5.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence is of false implication under Sections 307, 399 and 402 of the Penal Code and Section 25(1-b), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. It is submitted that there is no allegation of injury to anyone by firing. Counsel for the State points out that the petitioner was apprehended on the spot with a looted country made weapon and he has an antecedent of four cases including under Section 392 of the Penal Code and Arms Act. Considering the period of custody since 9.6.2009, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 73 of 2009. Both the sureties must be his mother and sister respectively whose photographs and proof of 2 residence shall be appended to the bail bonds. The Court below through the local police shall have the bail bonds verified and only thereafter shall proceed to enlarge the petitioner on bail. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)