IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE; ANDHRA PRADESH; AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 849 OF 2004 (Criminal Appeal Under Section 378 (3) & (1) of Cr.P.C. through his counsel Public Prosecutor, against the Judgment and decree of the Court of the Sessions Judge, Khammam, and passed in S.C. No. 268 of 2002 dated: 25-06- 2003.) Between: The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. Appellant AND Padisala Muthaiah, S/o. Muthaiah, R/o. Palair, N/o. Bhagathveedu, Khammam District. Accused/Respondent The Appeal coming non for hearing upon perusing the Appeal and the grounds filed herein and the orders of the High Court dated: 08-04-2004, 25-09- 2006, 04-12-2006, 02-01-2007, 01-02-2007, 16-04-2007 & 19-06-2007, made herein and upon hearing the arguments of the Public Prosecutor as Appellant, the Court made the following ORDER : “In response to the order, dated 19.06.2007, Sri Rajiv Kumar Meehan, Superintendent of Police Khamma and Sri Suresh Kumar, Sub Inspector of Police appeared in the Court and filed a report stating that since efforts are being made do trace out the respondent/accused; that special Team have been deputed to trace out the accused, but so far no clues come to light, and that the progress of the search is being personally monitored by the Superintendent of Police, Khamam. In view of the same, post the appeal ‘for hearing after eight weeks. The presence of the Superintendent of Police, Khammam is dispensed with.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR TRUE COPY FOR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 1. The Superintendent of Police, Khammam, Khammam District. (By RPAD) Copy To 2. The Sessions Judge, Khammam, Khammam District. 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 4. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 5. Two spare copies. BV HIGH COURT DT.17.10.2003 JUDGMENT CRL.A.NO.1713 OF 2001 ALLOWING THE CRL.APPEAL