1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. SECOND APPEAL No. 907 OF 2009 Datta S/o Umaji Raut & others .. APPELLANTS VERSUS Devidas Shripati Mirase & others .. RESPONDENTS ... Shri P.R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate h/f H.I. Pathan, Advocate for appellants Shri v.D. Salunke, Advocate h/f Shri B.N. Gadegaonkar, Advocate for respondent No. 1 Shri S.S. Rathi, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 15h SEPTEMBER, 2010. PER COURT: Shri Katneshwarkar, learned Counsel holding for Shri H.I. Pathan for the appellant, places on record pursis, stating that the appellant wants to withdraw original Regular Civil Suit No. 63 of 2005. The said pursis is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. 2. The learned Counsel for the respondents are present, they are served with the copy of 2 pursis and they do not press for cost. In the light of the said pursis, the Regular Civil Suit NO. 63 of 2005 stands dismissed as withdrawn. 3. In view of the fact, that the Regular Civil Suit No. 63 of 2005 itself is withdrawn, the present Second Appeal does not survive and as such is accordingly, disposed of. [S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J] SDM*907.09SA