1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1584 OF 1997 Devanand S/o Vithalrao Pandav ...PETITIONER. VERSUS Union of India and others, ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.A.S.Bahah Advocate for Petitioner. Shri Alok Sharma,Standing Counsel for Respondents. ... WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2474 OF 2007 Abhay S/o Padmakar Dolhare ...PETITIONER. VERSUS Union of India and others, ...RESPONDENTS. ... Smt.Ujjawala Agrawal, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri Alok Sharma,Standing Counsel for Respondents. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 23RD JUNE, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. During the course of hearing, the order passed by the Principal Seat of Bombay High Court (Coram 2 D. K. Deshmukh and K. K. Tated JJ), in Writ Petition No. 6484 of 2008, dated 10th December, 2009 was produced before us. The section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, reads:- 34(1) Every suit, or other proceeding pending before any Court including a High Court or other authority immediately before the date of establishment of the Tribunal under this Act, being a suit or proceeding the cause of action whereon it was based, is such that it would have been within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, if it had arisen after such establishment within the jurisdiction of such Tribunal, stand transferred on that date to such Tribunal. 3. In the light of the said provisions and observations made, we find it reasonable and appropriate to transfer these proceedings to the concerned Tribunal. 4. The Registry to take effective and urgent steps in this regard. Sd/- Sd/- [K.K. TATED, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] MTK 3