§aka¢...-v"' w 1 /— ‘ 1 t IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR _ ”1 WRIT PETITION (C) No. Sm /2010 Petitioner Ajay Kumar Jangde, aged about 3O years, / S/o Rekharam By Caste Satnami, (Schedule Caste), R/o Village Khamhariya, P.O. Farhada, Tahsil Muge‘li, Bilaspur VERSUS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND‘227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA i RESPONDENTE ~1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary Tribal Welfare Department, D.K. S. Bhawan, Raipur ‘ /2. The Collector, Bilaspur / 3. Deputy Superintendent of‘Police, Ansuehit Jati Karyalaya (Aa Ja K), t 5 Bilaspur 4. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare / Department , Bilaspur ‘ é /5. Commissioner, Tribal-Welfare Department, Raipur *t ié WRIT PETITION (C) NO.941 OF 201 0 / PETITIONER ‘ Ajay Kumar Jangd e, e vrsus tate of Chhattisgarh & othe S rs (Writ Petition‘under Article 226 8‘22? of the Constitution of Indi ingle Bench : Hon‘ble-Shri Satish K: Ag’nihotrij \ resent :— Shri Parag Kotech‘a, Advocate for the petitione P r. RNT ESPONDE a) ‘ S J. Passed bn this 18f“ day of‘du‘ne', 20:10) 1. This is the case.,gwher‘ein according to? the petitioner, o 3—2—‘2006‘ persons beiongingrto other ca ame‘iy arém arun,‘ Dhnukram, Videshi, A‘r'un‘; Meluram Yadavan‘d. Saidei cauSed njury to the, petitioner with dangerous Weapons Iike‘Lathi, Tabbai ulhari . Accordingiy, the aiieged acc‘used persons Were charged fo omrissiori of offences punishable/under Sections? 1747; 1-48; 1 4 di -3 f rocitieS)rAct, 1989. .Theca‘se has been registered and committed t t o the trial. ’ 2.§ ; ppg p e .Le‘arned counsel aearin-for the etitioner submits thatth I pei f ttioner, being a; Satnami. a Schedule casteuin “the State o o reliefs during pendency of the ‘t'ria‘‘l ‘u’n‘d‘e‘ t r: he provisionsof Rule 7-of Chhattisgarh Anusuoh'it;da t " Akash‘mikata Yojana) Niyam, 1995'(for short “the Rules, 19953 ( 1. L s n :2 st *h Ajui T v r i , K r cg * ‘ " 52,: 307, 427, 294 and ”506 ‘B’ of India ‘Penal‘Code a"nd.3(i‘)‘(x,)' an’i (ii)(v) of Schedule-Casteand Schedule Tribe (Prevention o is ar.‘ is e‘n tt h t earned counsel ‘furthere‘s‘Ubmits that'no finanCial or other help ha e cas th e. ( .: i t i t this juncture, learnéd counSel appearingJforztheI Stat submit / y py wh R ;. A e“ s that appropriate Steps shaH be taken immediatel to coml it the provisions of the ules, 1995 ACcordingly,: the petition stands dissed of with é direction t he State, aUthor‘ities to examinethe, casei of theip‘etitioner and gran tatutory r’eiief as provided un’derthe rp/govisions o’f te‘Ruies, 199 ithin a period of 4 weeks from today. iberty‘isr resrved to: the w L e , ie‘titioher/to m-a‘‘ke a reprsentatio detailing the ‘reli'e'f‘swhich‘ he i e o d o advised Sd/— ASH K. AGNIHOTRI a Judge .f en s ntitled to under provisin of law within a pe’riO‘ of ne week,,if,so . 4: ’ , po ot t t s n 5 e STI t