FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APLICATION NO.58 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2879 OF 2009. ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ We have heard Mr. Phatale, learned Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Shendurnikar, learned Counsel for Respondent No.1, Mr. Godbharle, learned A.P.P. for the Respondents 1,2 and 4 and Mr. M.S. Deshmukh, learned Counsel for Respondent No.3. 2 Rule, made returnable forthwith and by consent of the parties, heard finally. 3 The applicant seeks review of the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.2879 of 2009 dated 8th March, 2010. The Counsel for the applicant points out Ground No.(I) raised in this application seeking review of the order. We also heard learned Counsel for the respective respondents. With the assistance of the learned Counsel for the parties, we have seen our earlier order passed in Writ Petition No. 2979 of 2009. The tenure of appointment order shows that 31st March, 2010 is virtually last working day of the applicant who was respondent No.4 in the writ petition. The learned Counsel for the applicant fairly concedes that he was heard while passing the order dated 8th March, 2010. In view of this situation, applicant seeks review of the said order and dismissal of the writ petition no.2879 of 2009. 4 We have given due consideration to the submissions of the learned Counsel for the parties. We have also taken into account the provisions of Section 114 r.w. Order 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure. In our view, this application is nothing but an appeal under the guise of review. We see no merits in the application. Civil Application for review stands rejected. Rule stands discharged. No costs. (S.S. SHINDE, J) (S.B. DESHMUKH,J) 31.03.2010. kadam/*