IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 667 of 2010 Date of decision:- 31.8.2010 Raj Rani ......petitioner vs. Reminder Jakhu, IAS, Financial Commissioner and Secretary and another ......respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. Madan Pal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Anoop Sharma, AAG, Haryana HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) The stand of the petitioner is that though the benefits of fixation of salary have been released in favour of the petitioner but such benefits have not been computed for the grant of retiral benefits. Learned counsel for State-respondent states that necessary retiral benefits will be revised within a period of two months from today. In view of the said fact, no further orders are called for in the present contempt petition. Consequently, the same is dismissed as having been rendered infrucutous. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 31.8.2010 preeti