1'Rktfi-a ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION Cs) No^^/ 2006 PETITIONER: Smt Shanti Das, €' W/o Shri Jogesh Chandra Das, Aged about 38years, Post- Assistant Teacher, Pr8sentedh'ySI»n^/o^&&}f-srsisn R/° Golden watch House' Gole Bazar' Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh ^' Through the Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, (C.G.) ^^v"!'^'^ 2. The District Education Officer ^/"~sa" '^^' y *^. -,. -.-_^^»^ Jagdalpur, District Bastar,(C.G.) yS^ %- I! 3. The Principal, %fJ "Vpi^y ^ Govt. M. L. B. Girls H. S. School, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUENCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBTION. CERTIORARI. AND ANY OTHER WRITS. DIRECTIONS OR ORDERS. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIhBTRI^fc WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.3648 OF 2086 Petitioner Respondents versus Smt Shanti Das State of Chhatttsgarh and ottiers Present : Mr.AlokDewangan.counselforthepetitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel lawyer for the State/ respondents. ORDER (Passed on 29m Day of January, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the peUtioner as wetl as for the State/respondente Joindy submit that the factsand question of law involved in Uie present writ petition are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwa] vs. Municipal Coiporation, Durg and another . '^ 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petitton (S.) No.5862 of 2006 (Hemant Kumar Wshwakanna vs. State of Cfihattisgaifi and others) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 12-12- 2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclature of the Basic Training Instifcrte, i.e., B.T.t. has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.5862 of 2006 (f-temant Kumar Visffwakamia vs. Stete o/ ChhatSsgarh ancS ofhers) (Supra). . 3. For the afbrementioned reasons, the vwft petftion is disposed of in terms of the deciskm of this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaf (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired D.Ed. Certificate at his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance tncrements or not. No order as to costs. _— — Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006(II)MPJR-CG96 r