IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6139 OF 2009 Smt. Surekha Bhausaheb Patil. ... Petitioner Versus 1. Radhaji Shripath Patil, President, Shree Sant Dnyaneshwar Vidya Prasarak Mandal & ors. ....Respondents Mr. Anil Kumar Patil for the Petitioner. Mr. A.P. Vanarse, AGP, for the Respondents No.3, 4 and 6. Mr. S.M. Subrad for the Respondent No.5. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 11TH JANUARY, 2010. P.C. :- 1. In the impugned order, it is rightly held that the order passed in the Petitioner’s favour against Respondents No.1 and 2 cannot be enforced against the Respondent No.5. Respondent No.5 took over the management of the institution from Respondent No.1. In the agreement it is specifically stated that the Respondent No.1 would continue to be responsible with respect to the cases filed in the School Tribunal by the teachers and the non-teaching staff. This covered the Petitioner. Further, the President of Respondent No.1 informed the President of Respondent No.5 that he was accepting the liabilities with respect to such staff members. 2. In the impugned order, the necessary directions have, therefore, been passed against the Education Officer and Respondents No.1 and 2. I have no reason to doubt that the Education Officer/ Respondent No.3 herein will carry out the directions of the School Tribunal expeditiously. Mr. Vanarse, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the Respondent No.3 states that the Respondent No.3 will try and comply with the order on or before 20th March, 2010. 3. Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.