IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 212 OF 2010 MRS. MANEESHA NARVEKAR ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 4 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. S. Narvekar,Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Vivek Rodrigues, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondent nos.1 & 2. Mr. S. Padiyar, Advocate for Respondent no.3. Mr. Amey Kakodkar, Advocate for Respondent no.4. Coram:- A. S. OKA & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 16th June, 2010 P.C: We have heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner. The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner is not pressing the petition on merits, but considering the controversy involved, the second appellate authority be directed to dispose the appeal expeditiously. 2. The said prayer deserves to be accepted. 3. Hence the petition is disposed of by passing the following order: Order: a) The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed for. b) The second appellate authority will decide the appeal within a period of six weeks from the date of which a certified copy of this order is produced before the appellate authority. c) All contentions of the parties on merits of the appeal are kept open. A. S. OKA, J. F. M. REIS, J. ap/-