IN THE HIGH CQURT OF JUDICATQRE AT BILASPUR (QIHATTIsGARu) mngla; Engnch w. P. No. W38ol= 2005 Raj Kumar Verma, S/ oShri Ram Kumar Verma, aged About 42 years, Resident Of Mu_ngeli,Tahsil Mungeli Dist. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS ESPONDENTS\5§ ‘ 1. State of Chhattisgarh thfough \n 9\,..w v. an. 'x é Secretary, Education, Kalyan Sfngh Department Mantrafaya, Bhawan, Dau of . \§§ _",.‘,.r--"""/O Raipur [Chhattisgarh] $“‘ y...” 2. Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchanaiaya, Dau Kaiyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 3. Coiiector, District Biiaspur (Chhattisgarh) State of Madhya Pradesh through the Secretary, Department of Education, Vailabh Bhawan, Bhopai (MP) M WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSHTUTION OF INDIA FOR IS§UANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIQRARI, MANDAMU§, PROHIBITION AND N OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS: R %' " ‘ "w & ." XI—HC—78 wrWaf di continued. Petitioner’s further case i te chers in the Panchayat schools the re pondents are required to consider the ca e of ex- th m re pondent No:2 and he be directed o decide the representation of the pe itioner, to which learned counsel for th respondents has no objection. Having heard learned counsel for he parties and having regard to facts circumstances of the case, the pettioner is allowed to make a detailed re resentation raising all his grievances o respondent No.2 within a period of 'te days from today and in turn respo dent No.2 is directed to decide the re resentation of the petitioner within a other three months from the date of re eipt of the representation after consi ering all the grievances raised by the p titioner in accordance with law. a 3W1 W (asWa) “waxW 311%? .5 Shri Afroz’Khan, counsel for the pe1 :itioner. Shri Sudhir Agrawal, Panel Lawyer or respondent No.1 to 3. The petitioner‘s case is that in t e year 1981 he was appointed as wagaon, District Bilaspur on adhoc ba is for a period three months. However after 23 days the petitioner’s services that while filling up the vacancy of i i g z i s i € #31’fmemam @ As istant Teacher in the Primary School, adhoc teachers but the petitio er’s case is not being considered by respondents. Therefore, counsel to the petitioner submits that petitioner y be allowed to make a detailed repr sentation raising all his grievances to With the direction aforesaid, the p Etition stands disposed of. Certitied copy as per rules. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge &“4 W, admits, WW at; 20o 3 a ’