IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16269 of 2011 NAND KISHORE SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and in course of investigation; the name of this petitioner came in this case. It is alleged that on the basis of disclosure made by the petitioner, some stolen vehicles were recovered but contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner runs a tea shop and as a matter of fact, no recovery has been made on the basis of statement made by the petitioner rather the I.O. seized the vehicle of the uncle of the petitioner and implicated him in the alleged crime. It is also pointed out by him that the petitioner has already been granted privilege of bail in Marhaura P.S. Case No. 162 of 2010 and having similar allegation, some co-accused persons have already been released on bail by this court. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, namely, Nand Kishore Sah be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Arrah Town P.S. Case No. 300 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Arrah. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)