IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-36946 of 2011 Date of decision: December 12, 2011. Narinder Pal Singh @ Ninder .. Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and others. .. Respondents * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI * * * PRESENT Mr.H.S.Rakhra, Advocate, for the petitioner. M.M.S.BEDI, J (ORAL). Through the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks a direction to the State to take action against the police officials for having falsely implicated the petitioner for the circumstances which have not been mentioned in the petition. After hearing the counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the petitioner is an accused who is in custody as an under trial. There may be patent irregularity or illegality during the course of investigation which may be pointed out by the petitioner during the course of trial. The petitioner will have an opportunity to impeach the credit of the witnesses during the course of examination. In case the petitioner is able to show, to the satisfaction of the trial Court, that there have been patent illegalities in the investigation to falsely implicate the petitioner, he can always seek acquittal by availing the advantage of benefit of doubt. The present petition is pre-mature. Disposed of as pre-mature with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the pleas at opportune time and seek benefit in accordance with law, if he is able to establish the pleas taken in this petition. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE December 12, 2011. rka