IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17141 of 2011 1. Sharma Yadav, S/O Jagapati Yadav, Resident of Village-Bhagar, Anchal and Police Station-Siswan, District-Siwan. 2. Nanhey Ali, S/O Late Jan Mohammad, Resident of Village-Hassanpura, Anchal-Hussainganj, Police Station-M.H. Nagar, District-Siwan. 3. Anwar Alam, S/O Wasil Mian, Resident of Village-Piyaur, Anchal Hussainganj, Police Station-M.H. Nagar, District-Siwan. 4. Madan Singh, S/O Kanhaiya Singh, Resident of Village-Bhikhpur Bhagwanpur, Anchal Siswan, P.S. Siswan, District-Siwan. 5. Gaya Ram, S/O Sahelu Ram, Resident of Village-Telkathu, Anchal- Hussainganj, P.S. M. H. Nagar, District-Siwan. 6. Most. Aaisa Khatoon, W/O Late Munir Khan, Village-Shekhpura, Anchal- Siswan, P.S. Siswan, District-Siwan. . . . . . Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Deputy Development Commissioner-Cum-Chief Executive Officer, Siwan. 3. The Block Development Officer, Siswan, District-Siwan. 4. The Block Development Officer, Hussainganj, District-Siwan. . . . . . Respondents. ----------- 2/ 16.11.2011 The petitioner nos.1, 4 and 6 are P.D.S. dealers within Siswan Block in the district of Siwan. Petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 5 are P.D.S. dealers within Hussainganj Block in the district of Siwan. Petitioner nos. 2 to 5 submits that they received 378.87, 296.30, 224.14 and 291.11 quintals of rice respectively under SGRY Scheme. These petitioners submit that they have distributed the entire quantity of rice allotted to them against issuance of permits. Counsel for the State submits that the submission of the petitioners is subject to verification. Petitioner nos. 2 to 5 would file a detailed representation before the concerned Block Development Officer within four weeks from today, who would dispose of their representations within a further period of 10 weeks in 2 accordance with law. It would appear from notice dated 18.08.2011 that petitioner no.1 was allotted 449 quintals. The petitioner submits that he distributed 253.95 quintals of rice, as such 195.05 quintals of rice still remains with him. The petitioner no.1 would deposit 25 % of 195.05 quintals of rice at the rate of Rs.10/- per kg. within six weeks from today. The petitioner should file his representation within four weeks from today, which would be disposed of by respondent no.3 within a further period of ten weeks. Petitioner no.6 submits that she is not a P.D.S. dealer rather her husband late Munir Khan was the P.D.S. dealer. The petitioner submits that the notice is also in the name of her late husband. She further submits that she has no knowledge regarding the transaction of rice under the SGRY Scheme, which was handed over by her husband. She submits that she is a Pardanasi lady. The petitioner no.6 too should represent before respondent no.3 within five weeks from today, who would dispose of the representation within a further period of ten weeks. In the meantime, no coercive steps would be taken against the petitioners. This writ application stands disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)