IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2008 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 9595 of 2008(P) ------------------------- OS.145/2000 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,KOLLAM .................... PETITIONER: ------------ R. LOKA NAYAKI, D/O. LATE ARUNACHALAM KONAR, NO.52, BHARATHER STREET, KATTABHOMMAN JUNCTION, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI, TAMIL NADU. BY ADV. SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS SRI.ROSHEN.D.ALEXANDER RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. VANAMOORTHYKONAR, S/O. LATE ARUNACHALAMKONAR, LAKSHMI VILASOM, CONTONMENT SOUTH FROM PUTHEN VEETTIL, THAMARAKULAM WARD, KOLLAM. 2. SAKARLINGAM, HOUSE NO.18/908, PUTHENVEETTIL, THAMARAKULAM WARD, KOLLAM. 3. PADMANABHAN, HOUSE NO.18/908, PUTHEN VEETTIL,THAMARAKULAM WARD, KOLLAM. 4. N. GOMATHY AMMAL, HOUSE NO.49, SEETHARAM COMPOUND, EAST STREET, NAGARCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, TAMILNADU. 5. GOKULAM SARASWATHY, D/O. LATE ARUNACHALAMKONAR, ILLAM 92, VANCHI NAGAR, ILAMCHI, (VIA) THENKASI. 6. RAMALAKSHMI, HOUSE NO.18/908, PUTHEN VEETTIL, THAMARAKULAM WARD, KOLLAM. 7. BALAKRISHNAN, HOUSE NO.18/908, PUTHENVEETTIL, THAMARAKULAM WARD, KOLLAM. 8. REKHA DEVI, B5,F6, MAHALEKSHMI APARTMENT, ADAMPAKKA, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU. 9. ARUN, HOUSE NO.18/908, PUTHENVEETTIL, THAMARAKULAM WARD, KOLLAM. 10. FATHIMA BEEVI, M.C.386, CANTONMENT SOUTH WARD, KOLLAM. 11. AISHA BEEVI, M.C.386, CANTONMENT SOUTH WARD, KOLLAM. 12. SUBHAIR, M.C.386, CANTONMENT SOUTH WARD, KOLLAM. 13. HABEEBA, M.C.386, CANTONMENT SOUTH WARD, KOLLAM. 14. SIDDIQUE, M.C.386, CANTONMENT SOUTH WARD, KOLLAM. 15. MOHAMMED FAROOK, M.C.386, CANTONMENT SOUTH WARD, KOLLAM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 9595 OF 2008 --------------------- Dated this the 25th day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed with a prayer to direct the Principal Sub Court, Kollam, to accept the new written statement filed as Ext.P4 and dispose of OS 145/00, as expeditiously as possible. 2. I am not going into the merits or demerits of the materials available before me. It appears that there is some confusion regarding the written statement and now the party has approached the court below with a petition to receive the new written statement filed. Therefore I direct the court below to consider the said application, namely Ext.P5, after hearing both sides and pass appropriate orders. But I make it clear that till that time the court shall not proceed with the trial. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE vps