IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Single Bencl CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) N0. 3 TO OF 2011 PETITIONERS : 3^-3^ PR£:;:;[':;'::.;^'K^ pr^snLSy&y—-^"^-^"1 p?C.3S Ds^^o .^-'(0-11 Het^ss.s. ^"'^ ff/ \^\ •(j ^TA^ 4. 7. 8. Sachin Sharma, S/o Late Shri Lakhan Lal Sharma, aged about 48 years, R/o Rajesh Bhawan, Rajendra Nagar, Bilaspur (CG). Sadanand Patel, S/o Late Shri Lilamber Patel, aged about 58 years, R/o <Lilamber? Devnandan Nagar, Phase — 2, Bilaspur (CG). Anand Kumar Shelar, S/o Late Shri Lakhan Rao Shelar, aged about 54 years, R/o GV 70, Nehru Nagar, Opposite MIG 1/2, Bilaspur (CG). Babulal Patel, S/o Late Shri Anand Ram Patel, aged aboiit 53 years, R/o House No.55, Rohini Vihar, Green Park Colony, Bilaspur (CG). Anil Sharma, S/o B.P. Sharma, aged about 51 years, R/o Sarju Bagichan, Masanganj', Bilaspur (CG). Ram Krishna Lal Dewangaii, S/o Late Shri T.R. Dewangaii, aged about 48 years, R/o Rohini Vihar, Green Park Colony, Bilaspur (CG). Ajit Shukla, S/o Late Shri Munidranath Shukla, aged about 49 years, R/o Mangla Chowk, Behind Sharda Coffee House, Ganga Nagar, Bilaspur (CG). Onkar Prasad Pandey, S/o Bhushan Prasad Pandey, aged about 53 years, R/o Jaisri Bhawan, Milan Chowk, Kududan, Bilaspur (CG). 9. Dhruv Singh Thakur, S/o Late Shri Nain Singh Thakur, aged about 54 years, R/o Brihaspati Bazar, In front of Hariuman Temple, Bilaspur (CG). 10. Mohd. Aslam Khan, S/o Late Shri Ahmed Gaffar Khaii, aged about 56 years, R/o Salfa House, Juni Line, Bilaspur (CG). 11. Smt. Archna Patel, W/o Babu Lal Patel, aged about 47 years, R/o House No.57, Rohini Vihar, Green Park Colony, Bilaspur (CG). 12. Herison George, S/o Late Shri George Herri, aged about 59 years, R/o Sarin 284/16, Depu Para, Bilaspur (CG). CONTEMNOR/ RESPONDENT Versus Shri Yashwant Kumeir, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur (CG). CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT,1971. ^^ ^^:"^ XI-HC—78 '3'^ ^wm^, ^tdWi-o, I^TTHy /^ NINW SRNI^ ov4-^^^^.^ 200 %^i ^R^? ((iGt^^) ^TT^T ^T'f^t^" "(«?T3riI^?%1?Ni' Tumane ^<t?We^3?T^I SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shri ofttte itttei 20-10-2011 Shri V. R. Tiwari, counsel for Ihe Heard. Learned counsel for the petition^rs passed by this Court on 05-07-2011 dire^ting claim of the petitioners and take appropri accordance with taw, as expeditiously as till date towards considering the case case of Narendra Kumar Gupta vs. Shi\ Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur (Contsmf Court had issued time bound direction to In the present case, this Court had the claim of the petitioners and take expeditiously as possible. The order was which is stated to be brought to the representation received in the ofRce ofthe| Taking intD consideration the time, | not inclined to initiate proceedings at thi^ does not take any decision as orderedj possible, the petitioners would be at libert^ far as time bound direction gh^en in the concerned, as in the present case, no contempt proceedings cannot be initiated Accordingly, the petition is finally djsposed oflf at this stage. CM^fo4i^ 'Wf^ ^? fest <fa^< ^'Sfftp? 3ii^T astava. J. petitioners. submits that though order was the respondent te> consider the i^te decision in the matter, strictly in |3ossible. no steps have been taken petitioners. He submits that in the Yeshwant Kwnar, Commissioner, it Case (Civit) No.35 of 2011), this respondent yirected the respondents to consider apj3ropriate decision in the matter as (>assed by this Court on 05-07-2011, notice of the Commissioner vide (Commissioner on 22-07-2011. (A/hich has been lapsed by now. 1 am stage. However, if the respondent by this Court as expeditiously as to revive this contempt petition. As jsase of Narendra Kumar Gupta is time bound direction was gh^en, ^tthisstage. s<|ch ^ Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge T