1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.09.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD) No.11180 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 Deivam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief Election Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Election Commission, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Arumpakkam, Chennai 16. 2.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Collectorate Complex, Madurai. 4.The Assistant Director of Panchayats/ Election Officer, District Collectorate Complex, Madurai. 5.The Block Development Officer/ Assistant Returning Officer, Thiruparangundram Panchayat, Madurai District. 6.Subramani 7.Nirmala Devi 8.Kannan ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus preventing the respondents 3 to 5 to enter fake voters name in the voter list of Vedar Puliyankulam, which is come under 8th ward of Thiruparangundram Union Council from the 95th ward of Madurai Corporation. For petitioner : Mr.R.Murugappan For respondents : Mr.K.Mahendran, Spl.G.P. for R1 to R5 For R6 to R8 dispensed with ORDER The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus, preventing the respondents 3 to 5 to enter fake voters name in the voter list of Vedar Puliyankulam, which is come under 8th ward of Thiruparangundram Union Council from the 95th ward of Madurai Corporation. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. Heard Mr.R.Murugappan, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.Mahendran, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for respondents 1 to 5. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The petitioner has in fact made a representation dated 26.09.2011 to the third respondent requesting to delete the names of respondents 6 to 8 from the voters list of Ward No.8, Vedar Puliyankulam. The entry of the names of respondents 5 to 8 in the said ward is a fake entry, since they are already in the voters list of Ward No.95, Madurai Corporation. 5. The learned Special Government Pleader submits that the third respondent will consider the said representation by giving proper notice to respondents 6 to 8 so as to avoid any allegation of violation of Principles of Natural Justice. 6. Considering the limited scope of the matter, without going into the merits of the matter, the third respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 26.09.2011 and proceed in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible after giving notice to respondents 6 to 8. 7. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AS) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Chief Election Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Election Commission, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Arumpakkam, Chennai 16. 2.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Collectorate Complex, Madurai. 4.The Assistant Director of Panchayats / Election Officer, District Collectorate Complex, Madurai. 5.The Block Development Officer/Assistant Returning Officer, Thiruparangundram Panchayat, Madurai District. +1 CC to Mr.Murugappan, Advocate (SR.No.33801) W.P.(MD).No.11180 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 28.09.2011 nbj NSV/28.9.11/2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/