1 1. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11490/2009 DINESH KUMAR & ANR VS. UOI & ORS. 2. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3817/2009 CHANANMAL & ORS VS. UOI & ORS. 3. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9938/2009 GUMANA RAM VS. UOI & ORS 4. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8296/2009 BHANWARARAM & ORS VS. UOI & ORS. Date of order : 11.12.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. S/SH. BN Kalla, SG Ojha and Tanwar Singh for the petitioner(s). Mr. RL Jangid, Addl. Advocate General for the respondent State. <><><> The learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel for the State submit that the issue raised in these writ petitions has already been answered in the judgment of this Court delivered in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2718/2009 – Prem Prakash Vs. UOI & Ors. decided on 21.11.2009 alongwith other connected matters. In view of the above, the present writ petitions are also allowed and petitioners are allowed to continue on the respective posts till the scheme of Lok Talim (or scheme in 2 any other name) is implemented. The petitioner(s) shall be entitled for continuity in service, but no entitled to fix remuneration for intervening period in case the scheme of Lok Talim (or in any other name) is implemented. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/- 3 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO._______/2009 Date of order : 11.12.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. S/SH. BN Kalla, SG Ojha and Tanwar Singh for the petitioner(s). Mr. RL Jangid, Addl. Advocate General for the respondent State. <><><> This writ petition is allowed [ see separate judgment in S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11490/2009-DINESH KUMAR & ANR VS. UOI & ORS. ] decided today itself. By orders Court master.