IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29489 of 2010 1. KISHUN RAI 2. DHURMAINU RAI @ DHANARU RAI 3. DHANO DEVI @ DHANDTI DEVI 4. SUNAINA DEVI 5. SUKHIYA DEVI ------------------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 22.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners are other in-laws than husband of informant’s daughter, alleged for killing her and disposing of her dead body is doubted on the ground that only informant daughter’s disappearance has been believed for killing her due to grievance of intention of petitioners to sell her husband’s land. Further it is submitted that in reality before alleged disappearance from her matrimonial house she had gone to her Maike which is corroborated by Maike people. Otherwise also is said that she was living with one of her husband’s brother Dhanaut Rai. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above 2 named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 70 of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)