WP(C) 6158/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA. Heard Mr. M.H. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. A. Barkataki, learned Standing Counsel, Education. The prayer made in this writ petition is to issue a direction to the res pondents to appoint the petitioner in any vacant post in L.P. School as teacher under the quota earmarked for sons and daughters of retired teachers. It has bee n repeatedly held by this Court that for appointment under the said quota, the p erson will have to be a selected candidate, which the petitioner is not. Althoug h the petitioner has referred to his response to the advertisement stated to hav e been issued wayback in 2005 but there is no prayer for declaration of result t hereof. Further, the petitioner’s claim for appointment against the said quota i s on the basis of retirement of his father on 31.1.2010 on attaining the age of superannuation. Thus, the 2005-selection does not have anything to do with the s aid quota so far as the petitioner is concerned. In view of the above, no relief can be granted to the writ petitioner an d accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to respond to the advertisement, if issued in future claiming consideration under t he quota earmarked for sons and daughters of retired teachers.