BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N.BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.15778 of 2011 G.KATHIRESAN : PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TALUK POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.260/2011 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. N.SATHISH BABU Advocate For Respondent : Mr. C.RAMESH Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 420 I.P.C in Crime No.260 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit the petitioner has been arrayed as A-4 out of four accused and he has been implicated in this case on the allegation of helping the other accused to swindle the amount of Rs.3,63,000/-. He would further submit that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the petitioner has been implicated on the allegation that he is said to have helped the other accused to swindle the amount of Rs.3,63,000/-. He further submitted that the investigation is pending. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. The fact remains that even as per the admitted case of the prosecution that the main allegation of swindling the amount is made only against the other accused and the petitioner has been implicated on the allegation of helping the other accused. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police every day at 5.30 p.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter he shall be available for interrogation as and when required. Sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1, TIRUNELVELI. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, TALUK POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. N.SATHISH BABU Advocate SR.No.44670 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15778 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 NSV/21.12.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/