1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8464 OF 2006 1.M/s.Sairam Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and others. ...Petitioners. vs. 1.Dr.Ramchandra Vishnu Paranjape and others. ...Respondents. --- Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni i/b. M.M.Vaidya, for Petitioners. Mr.Nandu Phadke, for Respondents 35a, 35b, 35c, 36, 37, 61, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72 CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH J. DATED: 9th July,2007. P.C.:- 1. The consent terms between the petitioners and the respondent nos. 35(a), 35(b), 2 35(c), 36, 37, 61, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72 are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The learned Counsel appearing for petitioners states that between the petitioners and the above mentioned respondents, the petition should be disposed of in terms of consent terms at “X”. He further states that so far as the other respondents are concerned, he is not pressing this petition as they have not raised objection to the sale in favour of the petitioners. In view of the above statements, the petition is disposed of in terms of consent terms at “X” and the petition as against the remaining respondents is disposed of in view of the above said statement. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) ---