IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 24TH JANUARY 2011 / 4TH MAGHA 1932 OP (RC).No. 308 of 2011(O) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN EA 446/2010 IN RCOP.8/1989 of M.C.,VADAKKANCHERRY .................... PETITIONER (S): -------------------- P.N.PUSHPARAJAN, S/O.NARAYANAN, POOLAKKAL HOUSE, ATHANIPARAMBU, VADAKKETHARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER UNNIKRISHNAN, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.SANKUNNY, KALARIKKAL HOUSE, AMRITHAKRIPA, VADAKKETHARA, PAZHAYNNUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. RAGHAVAN, S/O.AMBALANADAYIL THANNIKUZHIYIL KORAN, PAZHAYANNUR VILLAGE & DESOM, TALAPPILLY TALUK, PIN-680 587. 2. ARAVINDAKSHAN, S/O.PADIYIL PARUKUTTY AMMA, CHELAKKODE VILLAGE DESOM, TALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR, PIN-680587. THIS OP (RENT CONTROL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------ O.P.(RC).No. 308 OF 2011 ------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of January, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks a short adjournment. We are not inclined to grant the same. We find that under challenge in this original petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution is Ext.P5 order passed by the learned Munsiff, Vadakancherry. The order is passed in a proceeding for execution of an order passed by the local Rent Control Court. We feel that the remedy of the petitioner, even if he has a genuine grievance about Ext.P5, lies before the District Court, Thrissur under Section 14. Relegating the petitioner to that remedy, we dispose of the original petition without examining the merits of the grounds raised. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE dpk