IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2008 / 14TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 16335 of 2008(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- SHOBHANA, W/O. SUDHEER, SANTHINIKETHAN, CC.25/125 (NEW NO.25/215), VATHURUTHY, RAMESWARAM VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.S.NIRMAL KUMAR RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. K.S.E.B., REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY, K.S.E.B., VYDHYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, K.S.E.B. ELECTRICAL SECTION, ERNAKULAM. 3. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, K.S.E.B. ELECTRICAL SECTION, THEVARA, KOCHI-29. 4. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, K.S.E.B. ELECTRICAL SECTION, THEVARA, KOCHI-29. 5. SUB ENGINEER, K.S.E.B., ELECTRICAL SECTION, THEVARA, KOCHI-29. BY SC KSEB ADV. SRI. P.P. THAJUDEEN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No. 16335 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges Exts.P2 and P7. She seeks a direction to sanction new electrical connection as per Ext.P6 application. Learned counsel for the petitioner Sri.S.Nirmal Kumar points out that the petitioner has filed Ext.P8 objection. It is also submitted that the petitioner has received intimation from the Deputy Chief Engineer that Ext.P8 objection will be treated as an appeal. 2. In such circumstances, having regard to all the facts the writ petition is disposed of as follows: If the petitioner deposits 50% of the amount demanded, the second respondent will take up Ext.P8, consider the same and pass orders thereon in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of deposit of 50% of the amount. It will not stand in the way of the fourth respondent considering the application of the petitioner for connection, Ext.P6, in accordance with the Rules. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb