IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 28TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 2679 of 2011(H) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. GOPALAKRISHNARU, S/O.PARAMESWARARU, AGED 73 YEARS, EDASWERIMADOM, KOVOOR, PALAYAMKUNNU P.O., CHEMMARUTHI VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695146. 2. RADHAKRISHNARU, S/O.PARAMESWARARU, AGED 70 YEARS, EDASWERIMADOM, KOVOOR, PALAYAMKUNNU P.O., CHEMMARUTHI VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695146. 3. UNNIKRISHNAN, S/O.PARAMESWARARU, AGED 65 YEARS, EDASWERIMADOM, KOVOOR, PALAYAMKUNNU P.O., CHEMMARUTHI VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695146. BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 695 153. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 695 153. 3. CHELLAPPAN, S/O.KUNJUKRISHNAN, C.S.BHAVAN, KOVOOR, PALAYAMKUNNU P.O., CHEMMARUTHI VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695146. tss W.P.(C) NO.2679/2011 4. SANTHOSH, S/O.CHELLAPPAN, C.S.BHAVAN, KOVOOR, PALAYAMKUNNU P.O., CHEMMARUTHI VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695146. 5. GOPAN @ AJITH, S/O.GOPALAKRISHNAN, KOTTARATHIL VEEDU, THOKKADU P.O., VARKKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 695 148. 6. SUNEESH, S/O.SOMALATHA, CHIRAVILA MELETHIL, NEAR KUNNIL TEMPLE, MUTTAPPALAM P.O., SREENIVASAPURAM, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 695 153. R4 BY ADV. SRI.S.D.ASOKAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JJ. ----------------------------------- W.P(C).No.2679 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 17th day of February, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the 4th respondent as also learned Government Pleader. Even going by the materials produced by the writ petitioner, there is a civil dispute pending between the parties in the Sub Court, Varkala. The counter affidavit also discloses that there are disputed questions of facts. Hence the police will ensure that law and order is maintained and any complaint of threat to the life of the petitioner will be appropriately taken care of by providing adequate protection. However, the police will not interfere with the civil disputes between the parties which the parties will have to work out WPC.2679/11 2 through the competent civil court. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, Judge. kkb.18/2.