IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A.No.3432 of 2009 Date of Decision : 08.10.2009 Shiv Ram ...Appellant Versus Haryana State and others ...Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate, for the appellant. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) On 24.9.2009, learned counsel for the appellant has sought to examine the question of jurisdiction of the Civil Court, when the claim of the plaintiff is in respect of land, asserted by the defendants as rasta shaream. Today, learned counsel for the appellant has conceded that the Civil Court will not have jurisdiction in view of the stand of the defendants in the written statement in view of Section 13 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961. In view of the said fact, he wishes to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to avail the remedy under the Act. In view of such statement, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, it is clarified that any finding recorded by the Civil Court in the judgment under appeal, would be deemed to be beyond jurisdiction as the Civil Court has no jurisdiction and, therefore, will not be taken into consideration by the Revenue Authorities as and when any lis is initiated by the appellant. 08.10.2009 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE