IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43340 of 2010 PINTU KUMAR @ CHINTU KUMAR @ VIVEK KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- 02. 22.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Torture for demand of dowry is the allegation, but submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is that petitioner is younger brother-in-law of informant’s daughter and is apprehending his arrest for the allegations only due to being brother of informant daughter’s husband. Differences might be there in between wife and husband, may never justify refusal of anticipatory bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No.215 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2)of the Cr. P. C. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)