R.F.A. No. 1510 of 1989 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.F.A. No. 1510 of 1989 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.12.2011 M/s Anurag Construction Company (P) Ltd. .. Appellant. Vs. State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Sanjay Vij, Advocate for the appellant in RFA No. 1510 of 1989. Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate in RFA No. 790 of 1990 and Mr. J. L. Malhotra, Advocate in RFA No. 1040 of 1992. Mr. Ashish Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. ... Rajesh Bindal J. This order will dispose of R.F.A. Nos. 1510 of 1989, 790 of 1990, 1040 of 1992 and 5829 of 2008, as common questions of law and facts are involved. The land owners are in appeal seeking enhancement of compensation awarded to them by the learned court below for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts of the case are that State of Haryana, vide notification dated 10.12.1984, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, `the Act'), sought to acquire land, situated in village Sikanderpur Ghosi, HB No. 68, Tehsil and District Gurgaon for development as sector road. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, `the Collector') assessed compensation @ ` 1,24,800/- per acre for Chahi kind of land; ` 1,04,960/- per acre for Magda kind of land; ` R.F.A. No. 1510 of 1989 [2] 35,000/- per acre for Gair Mumkin kind of land and ` 44,800/- per acre for Banjar kind of land. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the land owners filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below assessed the market value of the acquired land under licence @ ` 212/- per square yard and the remaining land @ ` 2,51,333/- per acre in award, which is subject-matter of RFA Nos. 1510 of 1989, 1040 of 1992 and 5829 of 2008, and ` 1,77,110/- per acre in award, which is subject matter of RFA No. 790 of 1990. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the claim made by the land owners in the present set of appeals is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in R.F.A. No. 677 of 1993—M/s D.L.F. Hotels Limited v. State of Haryana, decided on 11.5.2009. Learned counsel for the State did not dispute the aforesaid factual position. For the detailed reasons recorded in M/s D.L.F. Hotels Limited's case (supra), the present appeals are disposed of in same terms. ( Rajesh Bindal ) Judge 15.12.2011 mk