IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 31ST OCTOBER 2008 / 9TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 30964 of 2008(J) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- NALINI, W/O T.N.GIRI, AGED 47 YEARS, THATTIL HOUSE,NATTIKA P.O., THRISUR. BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENTS: -------------------- 1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY (RTA), THRISSUR REP. BY SECRETARY. 2. SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 30964 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 31st October, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner challenges Exhibit P4 proceedings of the Regional Transport Authority, Thrissur. Admittedly, the same is appealable. Therefore I do not find any reason why the petitioner should invoke the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on an earlier occasion, the STAT had remanded the matter to the Secretary, RTA, as evidenced by Exhibit P3. But the same mistake has been repeated by the RTA. Obviously, it is a matter which can be brought to the notice of the Appellate Authority and again obviously the Appellate Tribunal is not powerless to take cognizance of the same and pass appropriate orders on the appeal. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file an appeal an against Exhibit P4. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma 2 3