IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3191 of 2010 RAMRAJ CHAUDHARY Versus SATYANARAYAN CHAUDHARY & ORS. ----------- 2 03.11.2010 Heard Mr. Anjani Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears on behalf of the opposite parties. This application has been filed for restoration of Civil Revision No. 2022 of 2007 which stood dismissed for non compliance of order dated 24.6.2010. It is submitted that in place of filing requisites of service of notice through ordinary process as well as registered cover, only requisites for ordinary process could be filed due to mistake committed on the part of the office of the learned counsel for the petitioner. However, subsequently the registered cover has been filed on 22.7.2010. On being satisfied with the sufficiency of reasons mentioned in this application for omission on part of the office of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the date of compliance of order dated 24.6.2010 is extended till 22.7.2010 and the Civil 2 Revision No. 2022/2007 is restored to its original file and number subject to the condition that the order dated 24.6.2010 has fully been complied by 22.7.2010. Accordingly, this application stands allowed. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)