Q> IN THE HIGH couggmgg JUDICATURE AT CHHATTISGARH ggLBILASPUR.V Crim;nal Appeal No. uL’-.o[.{.ooonoe. APPELLANT (In custody) vSH? z Bhagat Singh s/o Nilamber Singh Caste Dhakar aged about 32 years & P.S. Alnar, P.s.Fraijarpur Distt. Bastar (C.G.). Versu$ RESPONDENT z STATE OF CHHAETISGARH Through: P.S.Fraijpur Distt. Bastar £C.G.). *‘1‘ CRIMINAL APPEApmyzs. 374(2) OF THE CODE OF cRIMINAL PR0CEDURE_;§3§. A Conviction ¢5entence. U/s. 307 of I.P.C. 5 years RL;. and fine of Rs. 50&€§ ‘defau1t of fine l month R.I. Arising out o£ $.T.No.»530/2000 decided on 25.1.2002’§;’11xrd Addl.3ession Judge Jagdal§ur (Bastar). 6£“ WWC/7‘A(3Vg W269 L 311%W (Wu) Wq'éTmW w m1m mwe aim 15/11/2002: - Miss. Sofia Khan, lzarned cou s2! for +he appellant Shri Gau‘ram Bhaduri, lecu'ned Govt Advoaa're, for fhe 1 Siam/respondent i i n f If is bropghf 1'0 ‘rhe notice < f fhis Courf 1ha1‘ 1'he appellanf has engaged a coimsel and filed an appeal which is numbered as Criminal Appegl No.292 9f 2002 against Th same judgment of conviction and gamma passew againsl him. Th appeal was filed on 13/03/2002. Thereaffer if is submi‘H’ed ‘H'Ia‘l' e’Legal Aid has appoin‘i'ed Miss. Sofia Khan and she has filed ihis ap r l on 21/03/2002. In fhe circumstances, fhis appeal is unnecessary and sfands (V. disposed of. kHowever, The counsel who has filedy'i/his appeal is en:i:le far. her- fees. @ZVK6€!’“" 'JE? $51»: "/S/. chiei J . V a i i Brajesh/J'yofisli i GRPRJ F3/350e72awe-(#50000.