IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 5TH MARCH 2009 / 14TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 7162 of 2009(S) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- C.C. SKARIA, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.C.P. CHANDY, CHERUKUZHIEL, MAMAMALA.P.O, THIRUVANKULAM, ERNAKULAM - 682 035. BY ADV. MR.KALEESWARAM RAJ. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FOREST AND ENVIRONMENT, KERALA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, KERALA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THIRUVANIYOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANIYOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 308. 4. THE SECRETARY, THIRUVANIYOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 308. 5. THE PRESIDENT, THIRUVANIYOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ERNAKULAM, DT-682 308. W.P.(C). NO.7162/2009-S: 6. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY. 7. CHIEF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, ERNAKULAM - 68020. 8. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, ERNAKULAM. 9. POLYFORMALIN (P) LTD., CHEMMANAD, VARIKOLY.P.O, - 682 308, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR C.V. PAUL. 10. MR.C.V. PAUL, MANAGING DIRECTOR, POLYFORMALIN (P) LTD., CHEMMANAD, VARIKOLY.P.O - 682 308. R1, R2 & R8 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. MEERA, R6 & R7 BY MR. M.K. CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, SC, P.C.B. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/03/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. J.B. Koshy,Ag.C.J. & V. Giri, J. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.7162 of 2009 S ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of March, 2009 Judgment Koshy, Ag.C.J. Petitioner filed Ext.P12 revision before the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions. Without expressing any opinion regarding the merits in the revision application and its maintainability, we direct the Tribunal to dispose of the same with notice to all affected parties as expeditiously as possible. Copy of the petition filed before the court is not seen dated and we do not know whether it reached the Tribunal or not. Hence, we are not making any outer limit to dispose of the revision application and we are not making any opinion regarding the merits of the case. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. J.B.Koshy Acting Chief Justice V. Giri Judge vaa