1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Civil Application No.2965 of 2007 in Second Appeal No. 254 of 2000 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for the applicants Mr. S.P. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondents No. 1, 2 (1) to 2 (3) Per Court : 1. Heard. 2. The application is filed by the purchaser of the suit property. He wants to continue this Second Appeal in place of the original appellant (the Court Receiver). The application is opposed mainly on the ground that the applicant has no title to the property and they cannot replace the original appellant (the Court Receiver). The fact that the applicant purchased the property of which the suit property is part, is also in dispute. But, all these questions can be decided while deciding the Second Appeal. At the moment, the applicant should be allowed to continue this litigation as the appellant. The application is allowed, as prayed for. 2 3. Shri. R.R. Mantri, learned Advocate stands discharged as 'Advocate' appearing for original appellant (the Court Receiver). 30th June, 10 ( A.V.NIRGUDE,J. ) srm/