IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 5TH OCTOBER 2010 / 13TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 29675 of 2010(H) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ MATHEW P.JOSEPH,S/O.JOSEPH, PODIPARA HOUSE,UPPUTHARA VILLAGE, METTUTHAVALAM KARA, PEERMADE TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BIJU .C. ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, IDUKKI - 685 603. 3. TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER,PEERMADE- 685 531. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 29675 of 2010 H ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 5th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Prayer sought in the writ petition is for the implementation of Ext.P6, an order passed by the second respondent, permitting the shifting of ARD No.155 of Peermade Taluk. 2. Government Pleader has no dispute about Ext.P6. Therefore, so long as Ext.P6 is in force, the third respondent is bound to implement the said order. 3. Having regard to the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing that, on the production of a copy of this judgment, the third respondent will ensure that Ext.P6 is implemented. Petitioner to produce a copy of this judgment and writ petition before the third respondent for the implementation of Ext.P6. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks