' W4 I IN THEHIGH COWIT OF ‘MADHYA FWbH AT @IAI-PUR ~ i b‘C PETITIUN " NO gsém ‘ \ f" mntruuugggggQgggulIIII CF . — P'oKoshul‘l _S/o $hri § years resn VnH5U$ Univgrgity i'ce Chancellw Raipuzf, Ravi M.£?. Shan‘ker’ Ravi threugh Shankar its Registrar Univaggity aipui‘, My? c l ' 3:1. (gag. 3 o ghopal, Chaneeller” mmx of Rag Ugiver BMgan “iti ghopagl,M.P. s ‘through’its The State bf Searetary madh‘ya i>zad7esg Finance Bho Department l M 'Jahallab Bhawan , $eczeta£y Rik: Higher Edu Bhepal, Department; M3 9f Ggvt. of Md} ‘ birestar Lo‘cal Fwd Auéit wpalior Mgti Mahal Ggvaliaz", Pa. u . o catim O w GQEQR$ad in Deputy frontmrecmr Raj-put af D.K.éi@spi\talrRaipw Disttor'Raipur.Moyo heal, A Fund Audit m 1 u‘ .. f ‘l ‘ L S §§g§ V R h . K4 g H h. 4x41§smr1émm a; amsn'é’eiai'qim" "' §vbb3q Sy/FS/2005r 20,000 ' 00.06.2005 “ Mr. H.B.. Agrawai, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, ‘ner. Mr. JR. Verma, Iearne ' Mr, Pankaj Shrivastav 4027.. , , V Heard‘ Learned counsei for t hasLmade several represent: 8 dated 30.09.1985, Annexuk dated 06.08.1986, Annexure dated 29.03.1990, Annexure dated 07.02.1990, Annexure dated 05.04. 1 990, Annexure 22 dated 17.08.1992. # representations have not bee Learned counsel ap earing for the respondents have no objection to the prayer of the petitioner that a direction be given to the he representations of the petitioners respondents to consider expediiiously. Aocordingiy, the conc the above said representatio monthe‘from the date of reoe In View of the above tr e petition stands disposed of. Sd/- SATISH K. AGNEHOTRI Judge 7/ ‘d counsel for respondents 1to 3. a, learned Panel Lawyer for respondents he petitioner submits that the petitioner tions to the authorities vide Annexure P- ‘e P—9 dated 02.12.1985, Annexure P-1O P-11 dated 06.04.1988 Annexure P-12 Pu13 dated 18.01.1990, Annexure P-14 x t P—15 dated 15.02.1990, Annexure P-16 ‘P-17 dated 03.05.1990 and Annexure P- .ccording to the petitioner, the said considered so far. emed adthorities are directed to decide ts of the petitioner within a period of two pt of this order. it? >195 \Wa ' teamed counsel for the petitio \