IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1097 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 1097 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 1097 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 476 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 476 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 476 OF 2007 Kashinath Dagdu Dhaygude ] .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra ] .. Respondents Mr. R.B. Paranjape for the applicant. Dr. F.R. Shaikh, APP, for the respondent - State. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED: 17TH OCTOBER, 2008 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. The earlier application for bail was rejected on merit. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the son is dependent upon the applicant and that this is the change in circumstance. That cannot be said to be a change in circumstance since that fact was already in existence when the earlier application for bail was made. 3. The Criminal Application is, accordingly, rejected. Sd/- Sd/- : 2 : [A.A. [A.A. [A.A. SAYED, J.] SAYED, J.] SAYED, J.] [S.B. [S.B. [S.B. MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.]