-: 1 :- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 7193 of 2009 M/s. Madhav Constructions. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. ..Respondents. Ms. Kranti Bhosale for the Petitioners. Mr. S. G. Aney, senior advocate a/w Mr. R. S. Desai for the Respondent nos. 2 to 4. Mr. P. P Kakade, AGP for the Respondent no.1 – State. Coram : S. B. Mhase & R. M. Savant, JJ. Date : August 25, 2009. P. C. : 1. Heard. The point raised in the present writ petition is that the Respondent – Corporation is not following the directives of the State Government as contained in the Government Resolution (G.R.) dated 7th January 2008 and also in the G.R. dated 2nd November 2006 providing for the procedure and and the modalities to be followed in respect of the tenders to be floated by the Government bodies. Those are the G.Rs. issued by the Government of Maharashtra and the question is raised as to whether those G.Rs are applicable to the -: 2 :- Municipal Corporations or not. 2. Learned AGP, on instructions form the Secretary, Urban Development Department makes a statement that these G.Rs. are not applicable to the Municipal Corporations and Municipal Councils and it is for them to adopt, if they so desire. Mr. S. G. Aney, Sr. Advocate appearing on behalf of the Corporation states that these G.Rs. are not adopted by the Corporation. He further states that the Corporation is not aware of such G.Rs. 3. Statement made by learned AGP is accepted. In view of the statement made by the learned AGP, we refrain to entertain the petition and it is accordingly rejected. 4. Needless to state that the interim stay stands vacated. (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)