THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN CONTEMPT CASE No.1532 of 2010 ORDER: The order, violation of which is said to be in contempt, is the order passed by this Court in W.P. No.9358 of 2010 dated 29.04.2010. This Court noted that the respondent corporation had already initiated action, for the unauthorized construction being resorted to by the 5th respondent and, as such, the cause in the Writ Petition did not necessitate adjudication. This Court left it open to the respondent corporation to take action against the 5th respondent in accordance with law. Alleging that no action has been taken against the 5th respondent, after disposal of the Writ Petition, the present contempt case is filed. Contempt jurisdiction is not to be exercised as a matter of course. It is only on a clear case of willful and deliberate violation of the order of this Court being made out would interference be justified. No order has been passed by this Court which can be said to have been violated by the respondents. All that this Court did is to leave it open to the respondent corporation to take action against the 5th respondent. There is no direction, much less one which can be said to have been violated by the 1st respondent. The Contempt Case is, accordingly, dismissed. ____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J Date: 29.10.2010 MRKR