1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5880/2007 (M/s Latiyal Industries Ltd. Vs. The RFC & Anr.) Date of order :: 19.03.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.Mahesh Thanvi, for the petitioner. Mr.N.M. Lodha, Addl. Advocate General. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that RFC has settled the cases of the other persons who are similarly situated to the petitioner, therefore, RFC may be directed to consider the case of the petitioner also. Learned counsel for the parties have invited attention of this Court towards the order dated 15.09.2006 passed in S.B Civil Writ Petition No.456/2005 which reads as under:- “ Heard. If the RFC has settled the cases of the other persons who are similarly situated to the petitioner they will hear the petitioner as well. The petitioner will supply the name of three such persons whose cases the RFC has decided regarding which he is claiming discrimination. If he names three persons then the respondent RFC will consider the case of the petitioner. If the RFC has not considered the cases of other similarly situated persons then they are not bound to consider the case of the petitioner they may independently do it in the matter of the petitioner. In that view of the matter, 2 there is no force in the writ petition, the same is hereby disposed off. If the petitioner makes a representation to the respondents the same will be considered.” In this view of the matter, I deem it just and proper to grant the liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the respondents and apprise the respondents that the cases of similarly situated persons to the petitioner have already been settled by the RFC, therefore, his case may also be considered in the light of those cases. Upon filing the said representation, respondents shall consider the same and pass an appropriate order within a period of one month from the date of filing representation. It is also made clear that all the grounds taken by the petitioner and the illustration cited by the petitioner for the purpose of deciding his representation shall also be considered. However, till decision of the representation filed by the petitioner, the status quo as it exists today shall be maintained. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. A.K. Chouhan/-