IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2007 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 34010 of 2007(W) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. M/S ACER INDIA PVT. LTD., CC NO.40/9259, MAYUR BUSINESS CENTRE, PULLEPPADY JUNCTION, CHITOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANGER, RAJESH JOY. 2. SALORA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, 339/181-B GROUND FLOOR, ANANTHA BUILDING, MAHAKAVI G ROAD, KARIAKKAMURI, ERNAKULAM. REPRESENTED BY ITS ACCOUNTS EXECUTIVE SRI. RAMANKUTTY. BY ADV. SRI.A.KUMAR RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE INTELLIGENCE INSPECTOR, MATTANCHERRY, SQUAD NO.1, ALUVA. 2. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, SPECIAL CIRCLE III, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, SPECIAL CIRCLE II, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 34010 OF 2007 W ===================== Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2007 J U D G M E N T Computer systems manufactured by the first petitioner and originally consigned to the 2nd petitioner have been detained as per Ext.P6. In view of the nature of irregularities that are noticed, I think the adjudication has to be held. In view of this, the goods cannot be ordered to be released as sought by the petitioner. However, if the first petitioner so desires, it may furnish security as directed in Ext.P6, or bank guarantee towards the same to the satisfaction of the 1st respondent and get the goods released. Thereafter adjudication shall also be done, as expeditiously as possible, and the same shall be concluded within three weeks of receipt of a copy this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp