IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39092 of 2009 BHIKHARI SINGH SON OF LATE PURSOTTAM SINGH. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 18/01/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 364, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Even though the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report it transpired during investigation that the Informant had some kind of dispute with one co-accused Ram Awdhesh Singh and on the night prior to the recovery of the dead- body of the little boy, the petitioner was seen in the company of Ram Awdhesh Singh and other co-accused persons going towards Aahar where the dead-body was recovered. Thereafter when one sniffer dog was pressed into service, the petitioner fled away. There is further material to suggest that the articles of clothing of the victim was recovered from the house of Ram Awdhesh Singh, pointing out that Ram Awdhesh Singh was involved in the present occurrence and in some manner the petitioner was an accomplice in the present occurrence of kidnapping. Taking into consideration the aforementioned fact, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)