IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.976 of 2010 1. BADRI PRASAD JOSHI S/O LATE AURANMAL JOSHI R/O MOHALLA- BANK ROAD WARD NO. 20, P.S. MUZAFFARPUR TOWN, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DISTT. MAGISTRATE, MUZAFFFARPUR 3. THE CHIEF MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MUZAFFARPUR 4. THE ADDITIONAL MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MUZAFFARPUR 5. RAJESH KUMAR TIKMANI S/O NANDLAL TIKMONI R/O BANK ROAD, SUTTA PATTY, P.S. MUZAFFARPUR TOWN, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR ----------- 2/ 15/03/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the construction of a shopping mall by Respondent No.5 in the town of Muzaffarpur. The writ petition is very general in its pleadings and so is the legal representation stated to have been sent by him as appended at Annexure-2. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the construction being raised with regard to non- confirming user of lands, violation of building bye- lays etc. let him represent properly before the Municipal Commissioner at Muzaffarpur which shall then be considered appropriately in accordance with law and disposed off by a reasoned and speaking order. The writ application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)