IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.780 of 2010 Date of decision: 8.7.2010 Ram Pal and another …..Appellants versus State of Haryana and others ……Respondents CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon’ble Mr.Justice Augustine George Masih Present: Mr.Robin Dutt, Advocate for the appellant Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) Appellants-petitioners are the residents of village Rukali. It was their grievance before the learned single Judge that respondent No.3 has allowed a street to be constructed in their village, contrary to the scheme sanctioned by the government. Be that as it may, the learned single Judge has come to a definite conclusion that a positive finding of facts was given by respondent No.3 that if street is constructed from Phirni (circular road of the village) it will be beneficial to the residents of the village. The gram Panchayat has not agitated the decision taken by respondent No.3. The appellants have failed to show what loss is going to be caused to them if the street is constructed in the manner as suggested by respondent No.3. No case is made out for interference. Dismissed. (Jasbir Singh) Judge 08.07.2010 (Augustine George Masih) gk Judge