IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 145 of 2008 Date of decision: 30.5.2008 Santosh Chug Petitioner. Versus H.P.Housing Board. Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Mr. R.L.Chaudhary, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. Deepak Gupta, J. (oral) The petitioner was allotted House No. 37 in Housing Board Colony, Beauli, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh. A suit being Civil Suit No. 39 of 1995 (92) was filed against her by the H.P. Housing Board on the ground that she had raised some structure in violation of the approved plan. A decree for mandatory injunction was passed against the petitioner and she was directed to demolish the structure, unauthorisedly raised by her as shown in the site plan Ext.P-7 and also one additional room constructed by her. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? yes. Admittedly, this judgement and decree was appealed against but the same was rejected. No further appeal was filed and this judgement and decree has become final. The petitioner did not abide with the order of mandatory injunction passed against her. The Housing Board filed execution petition 3-X/02 for execution of the decree. This execution petition has lingered on for almost six years and finally on 29.4.2008 an order has been passed whereby warrants have been issued for demolishing the structure unauthorisedly raised by the petitioner. Against this order, the petitioner has filed the present petition. The main thrust of the arguments of the petitioner is that the matter may be compromised between the Housing Board and that the petitioner has been making representation time and again for purchase/allotment of the land and regularisation of the unauthorized construction. This Court in execution proceeding cannot go behind the decree. A decree has been passed against the petitioner. The petitioner has failed to abide by the decree for the last many years. At this stage, the prayer of the petitioner that the matter be kept pending so as to enable her to approach the respondent for settlement or compromise, cannot be accepted. The decree of a Court must be complied with and this Court in execution proceeding cannot go behind the decree. There is no merit in the petition. Hence, dismissed in limine. 30th May, 2008 (Deepak Gupta), J. ™