IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC NO.9045 OF 2007 MD.ABDUL HAKIM,S/O LATE A. HUSSAIN, R/O VILLAGE BATAURA, P.S SAMBHARPUR, DISTRICT AURANGABAD AT PRESENT PRINCIPAL, MADRASA ISLAMIA AURANGABAD, P.S AND DISTRICT AURANGABAD. …………………PETITIONER. VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3.THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, AURANGABAD, P.S & DISTRICT AURANGABAD. 4.THE BIHAR STATE MADRASA EDUCATION BOARD, PATNA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY. 5.THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE MADRASA EDUCATION BOARD, PATNA. 6.THE SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE MADRASA EDUCATION BOARD, PATNA. 7.THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF THE MADRASA ISLAMIA, AURANGABAD, P.S & DISTRICT AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS SECRETARY SYED MD.DAYEM. 8.ABDUL GHANI, S/O LATE ABDUL RAUF, ASSTT.TEACHER OF MADRASA ISLAMIA AURANGABAD, P.S & DISTRICT AURANGABAD. ………………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02/ 30.09.2011 No one appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the State is present. In the considered opinion of this court, the prayer of the petitioner in this writ application questioning the order of the Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna taken in Appeal No. 22 of 2006 seems to be wholly misconceived specially when the services of the petitioner was approved by the Secretary to the Bihar Madarsa Education Board, Patna on the post of Principal by an order dated 10.07.2006 2 in view of the resolution of the Managing Committee dated 02.07.2006, and an appeal carried out against the said order before the State Government by Respondent no. 8 has been disposed by the impugned order by the Appellate Authority by remitting the matter back to the Managing Committee for reconsidering the grievance of the appellant Md. Abdul Ghani as with regard to his seniority over the petitioner. The Managing Committee of Madarsa Islamia being the Appointing Authority of the petitioner and respondent no. 8 has to only reexamine their case for appointment on the post of Principal. No prejudice can be said to have been caused to the petitioner in such reconsideration by the Appointing Authority which has been only directed by the Appellate Authority to look into the grievance of respondent no. 8 as with regard to his claim on the post of Principal of Madarsa in question. That being so, this application is wholly misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)