IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5184 of 2008 ARUN KUMAR THAKUR, S/O SHRI KAPILESHWAR THAKUR, R/O VILLAGE-PAUNI, P.O.-KALIKAPUR, P.S.-MADHEPUR, DISTRICT-MADHUBANI. ……………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE SECRETARY CUM COMMISSIONER, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHUBANI. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, MADHUBANI. 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MADHEPUR, MADHUBANI. 6. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, MADHEPUR, MADHUBANI. 7. THE MUKHIYA, PANCHAYAT RAJ BATH, MADHEPUR, MADHUBANI. 8. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ BATH, MADHEPUR, MADHUBANI. 9. PRAKASH CHANDRA JHA, S/O BIMAL CHANDRA JHA, R/O VILLAGE BATH, P.S.-MADHEPUR, DISTRICT-MADHUBANI. ……………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 19.07.2011 Petitioner is aggrieved by the appointment of respondent no.11 as Panchayat Teacher ignoring his claim. Petitioner has an alternative remedy before the statutory Appellate Authority constituted under the Rules. In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned Appellate Authority in accordance with law which shall hear the concerned parties and decide the matter in accordance with law, preferably within the time frame fixed in 2 the Rules for disposal of such matters. Arvind/ ( J.N. Singh, J.)