IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.489 of 2011 MD. TAIYAB MANSURI AND ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 23.03.2011 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 302, 304A, 201 of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioner No. 1 is the husband, petitioner Nos. 2 and 4 are the parents of the husband and petitioner No. 3 is the uncle of the husband. The accusation is that the marriage was performed in 2006 and there was demand of dowry and for non- fulfillment of the same the torture was inflicted. Petitioners admit that the victim fell down from the train when the U.D. case was registered at the behest of the father of the victim. Subsequently the present case was lodged. The prosecution case is that the victim was pushed down from the train whereas the defense case is that the victim died due to accidental injury. Since petitioner No. 1 namely Md. Taiyab Mansuri is the husband, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner No. 1. The application for grant of anticipatory bail of the petitioner No. 1 stands rejected. Let petitioner No. 1 surrender and pray for regular 2 bail which will be considered by the learned Court below without being prejudiced by the order of this court. So far as other petitioners are concerned, considering the conflicting evidence collected during investigation let the petitioners namely 1. Hanif Mansuri 2. Sadhu Mansuri 3. Jubaida Khatoon, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur in connection with Andhrathari P.S. Case No. 50 of 2010. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)