IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-6198 of 2009 Decided on:- 11.07.2011 Paramvir Singh and others ......Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondents Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.S.Bedi Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Sanjeev, Advocate for respondent no.2. M.M.S.Bedi, J(Oral) Reply filed in Court, is taken on record. The petitioners seek quashing of a private complaint and summoning order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tarn Taran dated 3.9.2007. The summoning order Annexure P2, merely notices that the evidence has been considered by the Magistrate and sufficient grounds are made out to proceed against all the accused under Sections 323, 325, 506, 34 IPC. The summoning order has been challenged inter alia on the ground that regarding the allegations made in the complaint, police had conducted an inquiry and on 1.10.2007 vide Annexure P5, a report was made that Surinder Kaur complainant, respondent no.2 was in unauthorized possession of the land and injury no.2 caused to her, as per the opinion of the doctor, was with a friendly hand. The doctor who had conducted her medicolegal examination on 2.7.2007, mentioned in the police report Annexure P5, has not been examined. Summoning of petitioners under Section 325 IPC, in the absence of any medical report, seems to be without application of judicious mind. Regarding allegations under Sections 323 and 506 IPC, allegations seem to be vague and uncertain which were required to be taken into consideration by the trial Court before passing the summoning order. Summoning order being non speaking order is hereby set aside. The Magistrate will re-apply his judicious mind on the evidence available on record carefully and would be entitled to pass a fresh order. Disposed of. 11.07.2011 (M.M.S.Bedi) mamta Judge