EEF‘OKE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF mTTlSGAEd-I AT BILASPUR Writ petition Nori.z ' QZ V2 /2oo4. «N EETITIONER WJ) Manoj Kumar s/o late aanturam, aged 4'q\0HH/1%Q ‘ ' - .‘ -' O abcut 33 years, R/o village Dewkar, Tahsil saj Distt. mrg (C.G.) a, : l. Ste of chttisgarh Thrcugh s Secretary, Departmen of Education. D.K.S. awn. Mantraaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. State c£ Madhya Pradesh Through : ecretary, Department of Education. Bhapal. 3. Union of aia, Delhi. 4. Collector. mrg 5. District Education Officer, Imrg 6. Principa Govt. igher Secondary School, Dewkar, hsil Saja, ist. mrg (C.G. ) . -mw—Wm WRIT PETITION. UNDER; ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF }’&NDAMJS, gERTlORAR .T. ‘ AND» OTHER APPROPRIATE WITS (ORDERS l DIRECT ION$ The above named petitioner reapectfu11§bags to submit as under :- lo pARTICULARs OF ’TriE pETI‘TioNm ~W As mentioned in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS /W As tixentioned it} the oause title. ....cont.... d /ra/A =a-~ — v" versus ta ha t Bha l S In l, H Ta Dt XLHCQZ Wmq€f1?f§€rm “$aafanavw This case relates to compassionate appointment consequent upon the death of an employee serving in the State. Learned counset for the petitioner categorically stated that in this case, the death of the employee has occurred on or after 1-l‘l-‘l 997 and not earlier. It is further submitted that in batch of cases bearing WP. No.1322/2 002 involving the same question orders have been passed by this Court on 20/1 2/2005. He prays that similar orders may be passed in this case also. Learned counsel for the State does; not dispute the above fact and state that the State of Chhattisgarh has taken a decision to consider the cases of dependants of those employees who died on or after 1/11/1 997 strictly in accordance With the policy prevalent at that time. ln view of the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the m ‘rits of the case, in the opinion ofthis Court, ends of justice will be served if a direction is giv n to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities concerned to consider and decide the c se of the petitioner in accordance with the policy prevalent at the time of death of the em loyee concerned. if the petitioner found eligible, appointment orders will be issued as ea ly as possible on or before 30m April? 2006. The ‘petitioner is also directed to render due c —operation to the authorities. lt is made clear that if any grievance still remains, the petition r may avail the remedy available under the law including filing of the petition before this ourt. I I \ l 22-1 2-2005 Petitionerby Shrimti/u SWMM WVLQWLJ/ Advocate Shri PS. Koshy, Dy. Adv, General, for the State. Heam. With the aforesaid observations, t is petition stands disposed of. Certifed copy as per rules Copy to the State counsel who Will be obliged to communicate the order to the respondents for compliance ‘ 5di- Fakhruddin Judge