IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3815 of 2011 Decided on: 27th May, 2011. Dinesh Singh. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & another. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Paras Dogar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure P-4, order of transfer. According to the petitioner, he has already served in the hard and difficult area and hence as per the policy, he cannot be again sent back to such area. There are other grievances as well. It is for the petitioner to point out all these aspects before the second respondent. It is also submitted that Annexure P-6, representation is pending before the second respondent. Therefore, there will be a direction to the second respondent to look into Annexure P-6 and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of 2 this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. In case the vacancy at Shimla still exists, the petitioner shall be continued there till orders, as above, are passed by the second respondent. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 27th May, 2011. (Justice V.K. Sharma), (tr) Judge. 3