1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 342 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 424 OF 2007 Arjun Vishnu Bankar ........Appellant versus Pralhad Shankar Bankar & ors........ Respondents. Mr. Prabhakar Jadhav for the Appellant Mr. K.B. Sonwalkar for the respondents CORAM: RANJIT V. MORE, J. DATED : 19th NOVEMBER,2008. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Jadhav learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Sonwalkar for the respondent. 2. The respondent/Plaintiff's suit for partition, separate possession and declaration came to be decreed by the trial court and this decree is confirmed by the lower appellate court. Both the lower courts below on the basis of appreciation of evidence found that the suit property is joint family property of appellant and respondents and consequently respondent no.3 held to be entitled for partition and separate possession of ½ share. The conclusions arrived at by the courts below cannot be said to be 2 perverse. No question of law much less substantial question of law is involved in the appeal. Hence second appeal is dismissed. In view of the dismissal of the appeal Civil Application does not survive and the same is also dismissed. (R.V. More, J.)