IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2008 / 19TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 16610 of 2008(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- THE MANAGING PARTNER, G.K.RUBBER INDUSTRIES, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE,PAPPANAMCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADV. SRI.M.R.ANANDAKUTTAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE CHAIRMAN, KSEB, VYDYUTHIBHAVAN, PATTOM PO., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE(U), POWER HOUSE BUILDING THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KSEB, POOJAPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY SC KSEB ADV. SRI. P.P. THAJUDEEN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No.16610 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 9th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges Ext.P5. It is stated to be an order passed by the Deputy Chief Engineer in exercise of his statutory power. Having gone through Ext.P5, I feel that the issues which have been raised are not seen properly considered or discussed. 2. I heard learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. He submits that the matter can be taken up for hearing. By consent the matter is being disposed of. Ext.P5 does not disclose any reasoning at all. In such circumstances, I feel that Ext.P5 has to be quashed and the matter reconsidered. Ext.P5 and consequential bill Ext.P6 are quashed. The second respondent will reconsider the appeal filed by the petitioner leading to Ext.P5 and after affording an opportunity of hearing the matter will be disposed of in accordance with law within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb