1 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4686 OF 2010 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. A.R. Gole for the petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 22ND JUNE 2010 P.C. : 1. This petition is directed against an interlocutory order. Interim injunction was refused by the Trial Court on the ground that the petitioner­plaintiff had not proved the possession. The lower appellate court has confirmed the said finding. No interference is called for in exercise of writ jurisdiction. 2. The courts below has given adequate reasons for coming to the conclusion that the 2 petitioner was not in possession. Admittedly, there was a previous partition between the parties and the suit land was allotted not to the share of the petitioner. Thus, there was a prima facie material that the petitioner was not in possession of the land. The writ petition is rejected summarily. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)