IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 22488 of 2002 BETWEEN: V. Dayakar Reddy S/o Govinda Reddy, Singarabotlapalem Ponnalur Mandal, Prakasam Dist. ... PETITIONER AND 1 Board of Intermediate Education, Vidya Bhavan, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 Secretary, Board of Adult Education & Training, Phankha Road New Delhi. 3 Regional Director, Board of Adult Education and Training Southern Regional Office, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. 4 Registrar, Nagarjuna University, Guntur. 5 Secretary & Correspondent, Pratibha Degree College, Kandukur, Prakasam District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 4 and 5 in not considering the case of the petitioner for admission into degree professional course on the ground that they entertain some doubts regarding the equivalency of uttar madhyam course sponsored by the respondents 2 and 3 to that of intermediate course of A.P.as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequential direction to the respondents 4 and 5 to admit the petitioners into the degree/ professional course treating the uttar madhyama Course of Board of Adult Education and Training as equivalent to that of intermediate course of intermediate education, Hyderabad and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.MANMADHA RAO KUMBHAJADALA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER: It is represented that similar writ petitions in WP.No.9780 of 2002 and batch along with W.A.No.1682 of 2002 and batch have been dismissed by this Court by order dated 28.04.2003, reported in 2003 (6) ALT 761. Following the aforesaid judgment, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J August 5, 2008 DSK