1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2489 OF 2009 Pradeep Askaran Chandaliya Versus State of Maharashtra. *** Mr. N. S. Ghanekar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. K. M. Suryawanshi, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** 1. Heard learned counsel for the accused/ applicant and learned A.P.P. In an incident intervening 9th June, 2009 and 10th June, 2009, a girl residing in the flat, was stabbed to death with allegations of sexual assault. Search of culprit did not yield any result. It was only based on the sim card and the mobile dated 20th June, 2009 the police stumbled to one Jadhav and consequently to the accused applicant. 2. The counsel argues, the role of the accused/ applicant is at the most purchaser of mobile from suspect Tingriya / Javed or at the most the role of the applicant was harbouring said Tingriya or Javed but nothing more could be postulated as against the accused/ Applicant. The accused, according to the counsel, will be more useful for the prosecution as witness than put him in the array as an accused. I quite see that the accused is in custody from 22nd June, 2009 and in M.C.R. since 6th July, 2009. However, without adverting to the comments made by the counsel, at this stage, the fact remain, the suspected Tingriya/ Javed was in the hotel of the accused/ applicant for at-least 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. few days. 3. At this stage, on instructions, counsel is withdrawing the application. It is accordingly disposed of. 4. Liberty to move after charge sheet. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:13/08/2009. ans/2489