IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 10TH OCTOBER 2011 / 18TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26581 of 2011(W) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. STEFFY ROSE, MANGAN HOUSE, VADANAPPILLY P.O., THIRSSUR. 2. NAVAL DITTO, VADAKKETHALACKAL HOUSE, P.O.ENGAKKAD, WADAKKANCHERY, THRISSUR. BY ADVS. SRI.SOORAJ T.ELENJICKAL, SRI.K.NIRMALAN. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 636. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, `PAREEKSHA BHAVAN', UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 636. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.26581/2011 W APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD.22/03/2011. P1(A): COPY OF THE CHALLAN RECEIPTS EVIDENCING THE RECEIPT OF THE PAYMENT OF REVALUATION FEE OF THE 1ST PETITIONER. P2: COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD. 25/03/2011 FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P2(A): COPY OF THE CHALLAN RECEIPT EVIDENCING THE PAYMENT OF REVALUATION FEE OF THE 2ND PETITIONER. P3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 15/09/2011 SUBMITTED BY BOTH THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).26581/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 10th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of the failed answer scripts in the 4th semester B.Tech Examination vide Exts.P1 and P2 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within four weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs