IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 8039 of 2009 Between: Gadam Venkateshwar Rao S/o.late G.Babu Rao R/o.11-3-286,New Mallepally Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep.by its Commissioner/Special Officer, Office at Tank Bund Hyderabad 2 The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep.by its Assistant City Planner, Circle No.V office atSardha mahal Charminar,Hyderabad 3 Mr.Goutam S/o.not known to the petitioner R/o.14-8-385/2, Jumerat Bazar Hyderabad 4 Mr.Papa Singh S/o.Not known to the petitioner R/o.14-10-558,Pahelwan Taleem Lower Dhoolpet, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents No.1 and 2 in not taking action against the respondents No.3 and 4 in respect of illegal, and unauthorized construction over the land in Sy.No.163/2 Jumerat Bazar, Namaplly village, Musheerabad Mandal, Hyderabad upon the representation of the petitioner dated 21.3.2009 as illegal and arbitrary. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.ABDUL NAJEEB KHAN Counsel for the Respondents: R.RADHA KRISHNA REDDY(SC FOR GHMC,SNCZONE) The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.8039 of 2009 Order: The petitioner claims to be the co-owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Acs.3.18 guntas in Survey No.163/2 of Jumerat Bazar, Nampally Village, Hyderabad, having succeeded to the same. It is the case of the petitioner that respondents 3 and 4, with a view to grab the said land, created false and fabricated documents; got measured the land, and proceeding with constructions unauthorisedly in the land in question. It is the grievance of the petitioner that though he made a representation to respondents 1 and 2 on 21.03.2009 complaining the unauthorized constructions made by respondents 3 and 4, no action has been taken thereon so far. Hence, the present writ petition seeking appropriate directions. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 2. Admittedly, the representation made by the petitioner on 21.03.2009 is pending consideration before respondents 1 and 2. Hence, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following direction: Respondents 1 and 2 are directed to consider the representation, dated 21.03.2009, made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, after issuing notice to the affected parties, if any, expeditiously. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 20.04.2009 Note: Issue CC in one week. (b/o) VGB