1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2115 OF 2003 Dharamraj Tiwari. ...Petitioner. Vs. Abhinav Shetkari Shikshan Mandal & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Ms.Prachi Khandge i/b. M.P. Vashi & Asso for the Petitioner. Mr. Dilip Bodke for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.A. P. Vanarase, AGP for Respondent No.6 ..... CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. December 2, 2008. P.C. While disposing of the appeal filed by the Petitioner, the School Tribunal has come to the conclusion that the appointment of the Petitioner was purely in a temporary capacity and was not on probation and consequently, the Petitioner could not be said to be a permanent employee under the fiction created by Section 5(2) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. No letter of appointment was produced. Both the letters of termination show that the appointment was made on a 2 temporary basis for the duration of the relevant Academic Year. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that the Headmistress has issued a certificate to the Petitioner to the effect that he was in service since 1999. The certificate does not indicate that the appointment of the Petitioner was in a permanent post. In these circumstances, the interference of this Court in the exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is not warranted. The Petition shall accordingly stand disposed of. .......