IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.4997 OF 2004 Shri Irfan Husain Shaikh ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... None for Applicant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. FEBRUARY 21, 2005. FEBRUARY 21, 2005. FEBRUARY 21, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This matter was called out in the morning session, when none appeared for the Applicant. The matter was kept back. Matter is called out as kept back matter after lunch break. Once again, none appears for the Applicant. 2. Record indicates that even in the past, on 17th February 2005, none appeared for the Applicant inspite of that, Court showed indulgence and kept : 2 : the matter for today. Learned A.P.P. points out on instructions that the trial of the case is already concluded. Perhaps, this is the reason why no appearance is made on behalf of the Applicant. Even if the trial is over, it was the duty of the Advocate on record to appear before the Court when the matter is called out and inform the Court in that behalf. That unfortunately has not happened in the present case. In the circumstances, application is dismissed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.