THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2090 of 2011 ORDER: The revision petitioners are strangers to O.S.No.209 of 2008, a suit filed by respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein against respondent Nos.4 to 6 for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 18.05.2007 allegedly executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiffs. The revision petitioners claim that respondent Nos.4 to 6 herein (defendants in O.S.No.209 of 2008) and another relative of these respondents Smt. Chinni Sannamma executed a possessory sale agreement-cum-General Power of Attorney in favour of the first revision petitioner - K.V.S.N.Raju on 14.07.2008 and delivered vacant possession of land to an extent of Acs.3.45 cents in survey No.326/2, which is part of the plaint schedule property in O.S.No.209 of 2008. They further assert that respondent Nos.4 to 6 received Rs.4,83,000/- from the first revision petitioner towards sale consideration under the sale agreement dated 14.07.2008 and executed a registered deed, wherefrom he has been in possession and enjoyment of the property with right, title and interest therein. They allege that the plaintiffs suppressing the fact of this transaction filed the suit seeking specific performance of the alleged agreement of sale dated 18.05.2007. On these pleas, they sought to be impleaded as defendants in O.S.No.209 of 2008 by filing I.A.No.1186 of 2008 so as to resist the suit claims and the reliefs sought therein. The Court below, by the order impugned, rightly rejected I.A.No.1186 of 2008 on the ground that the revision petitioners have no nexus with the lis in O.S.No.209 of 2008; are not parties to the suit agreement of sale dated 18.05.2007; and there is no privity between either the plaintiffs or the defendants in O.S.No.209 of 2008 and the revision petitioners qua the suit agreement of sale dated 18.05.2007 and therefore cannot come on record in the suit. This Court discerns no error either in the application of law or exercise of discretion by the Court below, warranting interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. This revision is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 24th June, 2011 GHN