IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22286 of 2011 1. Sri Kant Singh @ Sri Kant Kumar. 2. Shashi Kant Singh. 3. Madan Singh. 4. Dilip Singh, All sons of Rajendra Singh. 5. Rajendra Singh son of late Barhu Singh. …………………………………………..Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 13.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Khusrupur P.S. Case No.38 of 2011 registered under Sections 448, 341, 323 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that except Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, all the sections are bailable. It has also been submitted that the petitioner nos.1 to 4 are the own grand son and petitioner no.5 is own son of the informant and the informant is residing with his other son and with a view to grab the share of the petitioner no.5 and save the neck to Khusrupur P.S. Case No.37 of 2011 lodged by the petitioner no.5 and Khusrupur P.S. Case No.114 of 2010 lodged by the 2 petitioner no.1 against them, the informant has falsely implicated the petitioners in this case. As per the F.I.R., petitioner 1 and 4 snatched 3 piece of earrings from the informant and his daughter –in- law ( sharmasila Devi) and tried to commit marpit with her daughter-in-law and on hulla of villagers, petitioner No.5 having fired, all fled away. This is a fit case for regular bail. Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected. However, it is made clear that trial court will not be prejudiced by this order at the time of hearing of regular bail petition & same may be disposed of considering the allegation. Namita ( Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)