IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 7908 of 2006 Between: Fishermen Co-operative Society, (Regd.No. M. 472) Rep by its President, Chiraboina Yakaiah, S/o. Ilaiah, aged 30 years, R/o. Upparpalli Village, Chennaraopet Mandal, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Deputy Director of Fisheries, Fisheries Department, Warangal. 2 The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Warangal. 3 The District Collector, Warangal District, Warangal. 4 Deputy Superintendent of Police Narsampet, Warangal District. 5 Fishermen Co-operative Society, Deeksha Kunta, (Regd. No. M-480), Nekkonda Mandal, Warangal District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus declaring the 1st Respondent's impugned proceedings in Lr.No. 973/C/2005 dated 17-3-2005 requesting the 4th Respondent to provide police protection to the 5th Respondent society when matter is pending determination of the dispute with regard to the rights of the petitioner and 5th Respondent society to fish in the Pedda Cheruvu of Deekshakunta village as totally contrary to law, illegal, without jurisdiction and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same by further directing the Respondents to take final decision in accordance with the letter No. 973/D/2005 dated 28-2-2006 issued by the 2nd Respondent in accordance with law. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.LAKSHMA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR FISHERIES The Court made the following : Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RLD} O R D E R:- Sri S.Lakshma Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, has submitted a letter dated 28.4.2008 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________ 29.04.2008 bcj