WP/6377/2010 : 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6377 OF 2010 Sudhakar Vishnu Patil ... Petitioner V/s. Baburao Bhimanna Mugalkhod ... Respondent Mr.Shrikant Chavan h/f Umesh Mankapure for Petitioner None for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: AUGUST 31, 2010 P.C.: 1. The Petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Industrial Court on 16.12.2008 by filing the present petition on 5.5.2010. It appears that the Petitioner had terminated the services of the respondent employee. The Labour Court before whom the termination from service was challenged has granted him reinstatement with continuity of service and full backwages. Despite this order of the Labour Court, the backwages were not paid to the workman and, therefore, he filed an application u/s 50 of the MRTU & PULP Act for issuance of a recovery certificate. That certificate was issued on 26.11.2004. The Industrial Court has found that there was no reason to interfere with the order passed by the Labour Court in issuing a recovery certificate. It appears that a miscellaneous application was filed by the petitioner to set aside the ex-parte order passed in complaint (ULP) No.68 of 1992. The application was rejected by the Labour Court. Admittedly, the petitioner has not WP/6377/2010 : 2 : challenged either the order in complaint (ULP) No.68 of 1992 or the order passed in aforesaid miscellaneous application before the Industrial Court. 2. In my opinion, the Industrial Court has not committed any error in confirming the order of the Labour Court in issuing the recovery certificate. 3. Petition rejected.