Crl. Misc. No.M-4350 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Decided on: October 25, 2010. Crl. Misc. No.M-4350 of 2008. Jasdeep Singh .. Petitioner VERSUS Gurpal Singh and others .. Respondents * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI * * * PRESENT Dr.Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Sr., Advocate, with Mr.R.K.Chugh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Abhishek Chautala, AAG., Punjab. Mr.Adarsh Jain, Advocate, for the complainant. M.M.S. BEDI, J (ORAL). The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 12.12.2005, passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bathinda and order dated 20.09.2007, passed by the revisional Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Bathinda, discharging the respondents in a criminal complaint filed by the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner has, inter alia, argued that . . . 1 Crl. Misc. No.M-4350 of 2008 the status of the petitioner is that of a co-sharer regarding property in dispute and that the complaint filed by the petitioner deserves to be tried along with criminal case arising out of the same occurrence in FIR No.46 dated 15.06.1998, under Sections 447, 427, 506, 148 & 149 IPC, Police Station, Sadar, Bathinda, registered against the petitioner and others but since right of the petitioner as complainant has been curtailed by the impugned order, a serious prejudice will be caused to the petitioner. After going through the orders passed by the Magistrate and the revisional Court, I do not find any ground to exercise the inherent jurisdiction to re-appreciate the pre-charge evidence and arrive at a different conclusion. However, it is observed that the petitioner will be entitled to take benefit of the order of discharge in his trial and take the benefit of the order seeking parity in the capacity as a co-sharer in the trial held against the petitioner and others arising out of the same incident of 15.06.1998. Dismissed with above observations. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE October 25, 2010. rka . . . 2