IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4224 of 2011 PRITHIVI NATH RAI S/O LATE SHOBNATH RAI, R/O VILLAGE-LAWAPUR NARAYAN, P.S.-MAHANAR, DISTRICT-VAISHALI. …………Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, VAISHALI. 3. THE CIRCLE OFFICER MOHANAR, VAISHALI. 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MOHANAR, VAISHALI. 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, MOHANAR, VAISHALI. 6. VISHWANATH RAI S/O NATHUNI RAI, R/O VILLAGE-LAWAPUR, P.S.- MAHANAR, DISTRICT-VAISHALI. 7. SHIVNATH YADAV S/O LATE RAM PADARATH RAI. 8. SHIV SHANKAR RAI S/O LATE RAM PADARATH RAI, Both Residents of Rawapur, P.S.-Mahanar, District-Vaishali. …………Respondents ----------- 02 08.03.2011 Heard both sides. After making submissions at length, learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that a representation ventilating the grievance has already been filed before the respondent-Collector and the petitioner would be pursuing the aforesaid representation. He seeks permission of the court to withdraw the application The application is permitted to be withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Safik ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )