IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI TUESDAY, THE 22ND DECEMBER 2009 / 1ST POUSHA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 579 of 2009(B) ---------------------------- OP.1178/2006 of FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT ----------------------------------- PRABHAKARAN,S/O.LATE KUTTARU, CHANTHATHODI VEEDU,ARANI DESOM KAVALAPPARA AMSOM, KAVALAPPARA, OTTAPPALAM,PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.VINOD KUMAR.C RESPONDENTS : PETITIONERS ------------------------- 1. PRABHA,D/O.RAGHAVAN, PALLIKKARA VEEDU, MANISSERI AMSOM,OTTAPPALAM PALAKKAD. 2. PRBHITHA 12 YEARS (MINOR) D/O.PRABHA. 3. PRABEENA,10 YEARS (MINOR)D/O.PRABHA (RESPNDENTS 2 AND 3 ARE MINORS AND REPRESENTED BY MOTHER/GUARDIAN, THE 1ST RESPONDENT ADV. SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMI FOR R1 TO 3 SRI.R.SREEHARI FOR R1 TO 3 THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ------------------------------------ C.M.Appl.No.2005 of 2009 and Mat.Appeal No.579 of 2009 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2009 ORDER/JUDGMENT BASANT, J. The condition imposed by order dated 06.08.09 has not been complied with. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioner/appellant has not made the payment so far. This petition for condonation of delay is, in these circumstances, dismissed for non compliance with the conditions imposed. Consequently the Matrimonial Appeal shall stand rejected as barred by limitation. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) rtr/-