-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 333 OF 2006 Mr. V.D. Haldavnekar ..Petitioner. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumbai ..Respondent. --- Mrs. Uma G. Wagle for the Petitioner. Mrs. S. Ajit Kumar for Respondent. ----- CORAM : F.I. REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I. REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I. REBELLO AND ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED : 08TH MARCH, 2006. DATED : 08TH MARCH, 2006. DATED : 08TH MARCH, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. On instructions on behalf of the Respondent, the learned counsel points out that as per their calculation whatsoever dues the petitioner is entitled by way of terminal benefits have been paid, except for gratuity and the matter will be cleared soon after deducting a sum of Rs.15,000/- on account of the order, imposing punishment pursuant to disciplinary proceedings. The learned counsel states that the said amount would also be paid within one month from today. Statement accepted. -: 2 :- 2. On behalf of the petitioner, the learned counsel states that the petitioner is not accepting that the amount paid had been correctly paid or are the correct figures and as such disputes the correctness of the amount. It is for the petitioner to take appropriate steps in this regard. 3. The learned counsel states that the petitioner has preferred an Appeal in August, 2005. The appellate authority to consider the said appeal/ representation and dispose of the same within a period of three months from today. 4. With the above direction, the petition stands disposed of. 08.03.2006 (F.I.Rebello,J) (Anoop V.Mohta, J) .....