CWP 11171/09 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH SB Civil Writ Petition No. 11171/2009 Prahlad Tiwari Vs. State of Rajasthan & others. DATE OF ORDER : 30/10/2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. HS Bikarwar, for petitioner. *** Petitioner is basically aggrieved by the selection process initiated by the respondents while making promotion to the post of Head Constable against the vacancies determined for the year 2008-09. The contention of counsel for petitioner is that he is senior in the cadre of Constable and qualified Part-1 of the qualifying examination provided under Rule 27(1) of the Rules of 1989. His name is also included in the order Anx.1 dt. 29/06/2009 but he has not been permitted to participate in the further process of selection, as informed to him, on the premise that he failed to qualify with 45% marks in aggregate in Part 1 which makes him eligible to participate in the further process of selection but there is no written communication and disclosure of marks which he secured while participating in the qualifying examination provided under Part-1 of Rule 27(1) of the Rules CWP 11171/09 [2] of 1989. One who has participated in the process of selection, even otherwise, must know the fate of his participation Without going into merits, if the petitioner makes representation the respondents are directed to disclose/communicate the marks which he had secured under various heads while participating in the selection process initiated for promotion to the post of Head Constable against the vacancies for the year 2008-09. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he will be free to avail remedy under law. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. Raghu-11171-CW-2009-final.doc