1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.01.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN W.P.No.774 of 2011 M.Vasanthi W/o.Mayazhagan Ettimangalam Melur Taluk Madurai District. ... Petitioner vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Commissioner, Kottampatti Panchayat Union, Kottampatti, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to consider the representation sent by the petitioner dated 04.10.2010. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul For Respondents : Mr.V.Rajasekaran Special Government Pleader ORDER By consent of both sides, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents. 3. In this petition, the petitioner has sought for a limited relief to direct the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 04.10.2010. The grievance of the petitioner appears that she was a cook in the Ettimangalam Middle School Noon Meal Centre at Kottampatti Panchayat Union from 17.07.2002. She was terminated from service with effect from 01.08.2002 by the order of the Commissioner of Panchayat Union, Kottampatti, dated 31.07.2002, in the said order, it was further stated that as and when vacancy arose, the name of the petitioner will be considered for the post of Cook. Now, she understands that there are certain vacancies and therefore, she made a representation on 04.10.2010. When the said representation is pending consideration, she has approached this Court for the relief stated above. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. At the outset, the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents after going through the material document annexed in the typed set of papers submits that a communication of the second respondent was on 31.07.2002 and therefore, it may not be possible for the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim, however, he is not opposing to the disposal of the representation of the petitioner. 5. Considering the above circumstances and taking into account of the limited relief sought for in this petition to direct the respondents to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 04.10.2010, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the first respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.10.2010 in accordance with law and on merits and pass appropriate orders within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(P&A ) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Commissioner, Kottampatti Panchayat Union, Kottampatti, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. +1cc to Mr.A.Rahul, Advocate, Sr.No.2300 +one cc to Special Government Pleader, Sr.No. 2576 W.P.No.774 of 2011 21.01.2011 RR SMA/02.02.2011/5C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/