IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.94 of 2008 MUKESH KUMAR SHRIWASTAV Versus BIMLA DEVI ----------- 5. 23.9.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order passed in terms of section 125(5) of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with section 127 thereof does not suffer from any infirmity. The whole world can be disbelieved but the child of the petitioner could not have been discredited who has come out to say that his mother has never married any person much less Ravindra Singh as alleged by the petitioner. That being so, there was no reason for the court below to recall the order of maintenance already granted in favour of the wife. Consequently the approach of the court below in passing of the impugned order does not suffer from any infirmity. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/