1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 90/2009 (SALIMA BEGUM W/O. ABDUL RAZZAQ AND ORS. V/S THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. R.M.Sharma, Adv., for the petitioners. Mr. V.B.Ghatge, AGP, for respondent State. Mr.P.V.Mandlik, Senior counsel, h/f Mr.Amol Gandhi, Adv., for respondent no.6. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:18/11/2010 1. After extensively hearing Mr. R.M.Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.V.Mandlik, learned Senior Counsel, for the respective parties, I find that the order of the learned Taxing Officer, rejecting the plea of exemption, does not call for interference as the petitioners in the said proceedings were male and now, by efflux of time, have attained majority. In the eyes of law, 2 they are bound to pay requisite Court fees. 2. The order does not call for any interference. Civil Revision Application is dismissed, no costs. This court has not expressed any opinion on the merits and entitlement of the petitioners to the right in the immoveable property. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/90-09cra