1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8091 OF 2009 Krushna s/o Ambar Bachalkar, age: 56 years, Occ: service, R/o Lane No.5, House No.2675, Dhule, Tq. & District Dhule. Petitioner Versus 1 Rameshmal s/o Pradhanmal Galani, since deceased, through his Lrs: 1/A Smt.Shriyati w/o Rameshmal Galani, age: 45 years, Occ: Household; 1/B Banty s/o Rameshmal Galani, age: 25 years, Occ: Nil, Both R/o 10, Saptashrung Colony, Behind Vidhyawardhini College, Dhule, Tq. & Dist.Dhule. 2 Kondaji s/o Chimaji Gawali, age: 65 years, Occ: Business, R/o Moglai, Dhule, Tq. And District Dhule. 3 Ashok s/o Sukhdeo Patil, age: 40 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Mhasdi, Tq. & Dist.Dhule. Respondents Mr. C.R.Deshpande, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.C.Sant, advocate for Respondents No.1/A and 1/B. Mr.A.S.Deshpande, advocate for Respondent No.3. 2 CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 24 rd August, 2010. P.C.: 1 Petitioner raises exception to the order passed by Additional Commissioner, Nasik Division, Nasik in RTS Revision No.298/2003 in respect of recording of mutation entries in relation to the property in dispute. 2 It is pointed out that there was civil litigation in the form of Regular Civil Suit No.158/2003 presented by one Kondiba Chimaji Gawali against Ramesh Pradhanmal Galani. Parties to the instant litigation were parties to the said suit. The suit was presented seeking declaration of ownership in relation to the property in dispute and same came to be dismissed by 7th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Dhule, on 24.04.2008. 3 It is well established that revenue entries are recorded for fiscal purposes and those, in themselves, are not the evidence of title or entitlement of the parties in relation to the property. The issue as regards right, title and entitlement of a person, in relation to the property in question, is required to be dealt with by the Civil Court. As stated earlier, there was already civil litigation in the form of Regular Civil Suit No.158/2003. Thus, the entries recorded by the revenue officials would be subject to final outcome 3 of civil litigation including an appeal, if any, presented raising exception to the decision in Regular Civil Suit No.158/2003. In this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed. 4 Instant Writ Petition, therefore, stands rejected. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/wp809109