IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2008 / 18TH POUSHA 1929 RP.No. 1268 of 2007(R) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.30604/2007 Dated 01/12/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/4TH RESPONDENT IN WPC --------------------------------------------------------- K.K.SAJEEVAN, CHALIYAPARAMBA HOUSE, P.O.VENGAD, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENTS: PETITIONERS & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 IN WPC -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.P.MURALEEDHARAN, S/O.LATE K.K.NARAYANAN NAIR, KURUNTHAZHA PUTHEN VEEDU, CHELORA, P.O.MOWANCHERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. RAJESH RAMAN, S/O.LATE KUNHIRAMAN, "SAVERA", CHAKKARAKKAL, P.O.MOWANCHERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. (REPRESENTED BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER K.KUNHIRAMAN, S/O.KELAPPAN, -DO- -DO-). 3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 4. THE SECRETARY, R.T.A., KANNUR. 5. STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/01/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== R.P. No. 1268 OF 2007 IN W.P.(C) NO. 30604 OF 2007 r ===================== Dated this the 8th day of January, 2008 O R D E R The writ petition was dismissed for non-impleadment of affected parties. Now, what is sought for by the petitioner is that the matter be remitted back to the STAT, with liberty to implead the affected persons and pursue the matter. This relief does not arise for consideration in a review petition. Review petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp