IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 342 of 2010 Shrikrishna and anr v. State of Maharashtra ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr M.B. Bargat, Adv for applicant Mr A. S. Fulzele, APP for State Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 9th March 2010 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Interim anticipatory bail was granted on 23.2.2010 mainly on the ground that the applicant no. 1 is a Government servant while accusations against applicant no.2 who is an agricultural labour, are motivated and are not true. According to learned APP, the incident had occurred on account of one Vicky Mandave pouring water on the person of the complainant leading to an altercation between the present applicants, Pankaj and Mahendra. Initially, there were abuses and the incident of assault followed. 2, Considering the accusations which are in the nature of offences under Section 326 r/w Sections 147, 148, 149, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, I am inclined to confirm interim anticipatory bail subject to same conditions. The applicants shall after availing the anticipatory bail, as ordered, shall cooperate with the investigation as and when required by the Investigating Officer. After charge-sheet is filed, the applicants shall apply for regular bail in the trial Court. Other conditions as already ordered at interim stage to be obeyed till charge-sheet is filed. Application disposed of. Judge. Hsj