IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5812 of 2006 Sia Pati Devi, daughter of late Laxman Pandit, W/o Chandra Mani Pandit, Resident of village- Chakraushan, Prohadhi, P.S. Sarai, District Vaishali, parental village Rasulchak, P.S. Vaishali, District Vaishali … Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Registrar, Special Lok Adalat, Hazipur, Vaishali 2. Vishwanath Pandit S/o Late Sahdeo Pandit, Resident of village- Rasool Chak, P.S.Vaishali Distt. Vaishali ….. ……… Respondents ----------- 02/ 28.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the decree dated 2.10.2005, Annexure-3 passed by the Lok Adalat in Title Suit No. 59 of 2005, whereunder the said suit has been decreed in terms of the compromise petition which also forms part of the decree. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that aforesaid order dated 2.10.2005 has been passed placing reliance on the compromise petition said to have been filed on the basis of the L.T.I. of three persons, namely, Prabhu Pandit, Chandradeo Pandit and Sia Pati Devi, the present petitioner. It is further submitted that neither of the aforesaid three defendants in the suit put their L.T.I. on the compromise petition on the basis of which order dated 2.10.2005, Annexure- 3 has been passed in Title Suit No. 59 of 2005. 2 4. Having heard counsel for the petitioner and the State, I grant liberty to the petitioner to seek declaration from the competent Civil Court that the compromise petition on the basis of which order dated 2.10.2005 has been passed, petitioner and two others, namely, Prabhu Pandit and Chandradeo Pandit had not put their L.T.I. over the same. 5. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is disposed of. Arjun/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)