G: F ^w. ti!<3HCOURTORCTll-iA1"TISGftRM:BILASPUR WRITPEfn-ION (227V N0.41720F 2008 PETITIONER .SmtRekhaSahu, W/o Shri Ravi Shankar Sahu, aged about 30 years, R/o Gram Panchayatl-lasda Block, Rlagarlod, Distt. Dhamtaiff<©G). Versus ~ RESPONDENTS, 1. State of Chhattisgarh, ttirflugh ite Secretary, Panchayat Departmerit, D.K^. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Addjttonal Collector, Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari(CG). 3. Sub-Divisional Cfficer, Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari(CG). . Q/VritpetitionuhderArtic|e227oftheConstitutionoflndia) SinglfrB6nch :1-lon'bleShriSattshK,Agnihotri,>l. Present: Sliri P.R; f3atankar, eQunsetter the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakuj',1 Panel^ Lav@er for the State/ • respondents.;',' ,.,1 '•.•''•'^l'.^.:::1,.'.', . i'^"i: :• •..:;;''; 1 1 •:" - - ORAL ORDER {PaSsedonttiis31stdayofJu!y,2Q08) WiththeconsentoftearrtedCcitmsetappearingfortheparties/the petitjen is heard fihally. , 2) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that fte Aclditional Collect&r, Dftamtari, after having heard{heappe!lan((petitioner herein) came to the conclusion tKat prima faoie case has been made out fbr grant'of stay on 4-7-2008. On?T6-7-2008 wittKM.it there being any applicatipnfrpmothersjdetova<^t8;thestwprde^^wifhoutexaminingtto recQrds and hearing the appsltSfrt; tHe Additional Gollector vacated the interimor(lCTgrantedon4-'7-20Q8^withoutassigninganyreasons. 3) Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respond6nte, per cpntra, would submit that the appyiant may be granted liberty to make a fresh applicaticinbeforethe3RR®f|ate.authprity^toconstderhisappficationfor interim relief as well as pending appea^ may be decided ex(tedttieusly. 4) Maving heard leam^ counse! for th^ i^rties, periji^^ anddocurnents appended tlfer^o; jtappearsthattbeAddSionai^ellecte without examining the recQrdS^and^heanng the appeitant, Ijias wacated Vtw '~^ -1- interim order granted dn 4-7-2CX)8 without assigning any reasons. The order dated 16-7-2008 reads as under: "......^^;T^.T •^tj^idy 3ijR'+iijT|y sf'Sicbi^ ST^) ^^ ^T R^jc,b 1')7.2008 ^t R*l^ I.ITCT ^ 'pa'ti ^ W?r 4 5^r "yi^tciy gM R*li* 4.7.2008 ^T uIT^ !®-TT;T 3n^?T 'CTCT: jmetit^T ^r v!i ^ agftwft^ ?s gm 'cnf^cr sn^?r R'li* 26.6.2003 'swra^toT ?Ti....," 5) On perusal of the above order, it is evident that the Additional Collector has not applied his mind before passing the impugned order dated 16-7-2008. Thus, the impugned order dated 16-7-2008 deserves to be quashed. The respondents are at liberty to make proper apptication, if so advised, to vacate the interim order. Further, it is desirable that the pending appea! be also considered and decided as expeditiously as possibto. \ 6) Accordingly, the impugned order dated 16-7-2008 passed by the Additional Coltecfor, Dhamtari, is quashed and the writ petition is allowed to the above extent. No orders astocoste. 7) Consequently, application (I.A.No.1) fqr grant of interim retief and stay stands disposed of. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri ^_ Judge -w B iai@ii ^^^'^^^S^,^sS^^Ss/S ?^S^£^;^^:^^SK^S^S^iI^S