IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.35864 of 2009 ARJUN YADAV, S/o Upendra Yadav, R/o Rajajan, P.S. Mansi, Distt. Khagaria …………………………………………. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……………………….. Opposite Party. ----------- For the Petitioner:- Mr. Chandra Bhushan Das, Advocate. For the State:- None. ----------- 2. 16.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No body appears on behalf of the State. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the first part of the first information report has not been supported by evidence during the course of investigation. It is further submitted that allegedly the petitioner had fired at the informant but the pellet had hit somebody else and there was no motive to kill the person who had received firearms injury. However, in view of the fact that it was the petitioner, who had fired injuring a person seriously, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. Accordingly, this application is rejected for the present. However, the petitioner, if so advised, may renew the prayer for grant of bail after six months. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )