IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN TUESDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(Crl.).No. 75 of 2009(S) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SOMAN.M.K, MANIMANDIRAM, KUTTAMPEROR.P.O, MANNAR VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.GIREESH VARMA RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANNAR POLICE STATION. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANNAR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 4. MAYAKUMARI, PICHANATTU KIZHAKKETHARA, ARINALLOOR.P.O, KOVOOR, KUNNATHUR TALUK, KOLLAM. 5. PRABHAKARAN PILLAI, PICHANATTU KIZHAKKETHARA, ARINALLOR.P.O, KOVOOR, KUNNATHUR TALUK, KOLLAM. 6. VIJAYAN PILLAI, KUZHIYYATHU VEEDU, KANATHARKUNNAM, KARALI.P.O. 7. G. CHANDRAN PILLAI, KUNNUTHARAYIL HOUSE, KANATHARKUNNAM, KARALI.P.O. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. S. U. NAZAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP (Crl.) 75 of 2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE FIR DATED 10.2.2009 EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 13.2.2009 /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE A.K. BASHEER & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(Crl.) No. 75 OF 2009-S ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 24th day of February, 2009 JUDGMENT Basheer J. Mr. Sumesh Kumar, the alleged detenu, is present in the court. He has appeared along with respondent No. 4. Petitioner is also present. 2. Mr. Sumesh Kumar submitted before us that he has married respondent No.4 on 13th February, 2009 at Narayanapuram temple. He asserts that he has not been detained by anybody and that he is a free citizen. He further submits before us that he would like to lead a peaceful life with respondent No.4. Admittedly Mr. Sumesh Kumar is aged more that 23 years. He is a driver by profession. We have interacted with the parties. We are satisfied from our interaction with Mr. Sumesh Kumar that he is capable of taking a decision in his own interest. In that view of the matter no relief can be granted to the petitioner. The writ petition is closed. A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE kmd