[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.494 OF 2008 IN APPLN.NO.1299 OF 2008 IN C.R.NO.327 OF 2006 Anil @ Anna Digamber Bendre ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Pradeep Rajput for Ms.Anjali Patil Advocate for Applicant Mr.S.S.Pednekar APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : AUGUST 30, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 30, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 30, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant was granted bail in CR No. 327 of 2006 of Nerul Police Station. The bail was granted in the sum of Rs.25,000/-. 3. The learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that the applicant hails from the poor family and hence he is unable to arrange for the [-2-] necessary surety. It is further submitted that though bail was granted more than two months ago, the applicant is still languishing in jail as he has not been able to get the necessary sureties. Hence, it is prayed that the amount of bail may be reduced. 4. Looking to the above facts, I am inclined to reduce the amount of bail to Rs.15,000/-. The rest of the conditions in the order dated 26.6.2008 are maintained. 5. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]