1 SB Civil Writ Petition No.4239/2009 State of Raj. & Anr. vs. Ram Singh & Anr. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4239/2009 State of Rajasthan and another. vs. Ram Singh and another. Date : 1.5.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Vimal Mathur, for the petitioners. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners are aggrieved against the order dated 29.9.2008 passed by the Labour Court, Udaipur. A dispute was referred to the Labour Court by the State Government vide order dated 17.12.2005. The dispute was whether the petitioners illegally removed the respondent workman from service from 17.4.1992. Learned counsel for the petitioners vehemently submitted that reference was sent to the Labour 2 SB Civil Writ Petition No.4239/2009 State of Raj. & Anr. vs. Ram Singh & Anr. Court after delay of 13 years and, therefore, on this ground alone, the award is liable to be set aside. It is submitted that the respondent workman left the service and, therefore, he was not entitled to any benefit. I considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the reasons given in the award dated 29.9.2008. The Labour Court after giving opportunity to the parties categorically held that the respondent worked for more than 240 days and admittedly Section 25F has not been complied with. The Labour Court instead of awarding all benefits to the respondent awarded only Rs.15,000/- against the total arrears of salary etc. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in this writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya