IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2008 / 30TH ASWINA 1930 OP.No. 37137 of 2001(U) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- M/S.MAHAMAYA TRADERS, 32/1730-A, NEAR HOTEL ROCK ROSE, BYE - PASS ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, COCHIN 25, REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR, IJAY SHARMA. BY ADV. SRI.T.P.VARGHESE SRI.N.SASI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. SALES TAX OFFICER, IIIRD CIRCLE, PALAKKAD. 2. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER (COMMERCIAL), TAX OFFICE, SPECIAL CIRCLE, MATTANCHERRY, KOCHI 2. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON CMP. NO.60737/2001 IN OP. NO.37137/2001 DISMISSED 22.10.2008 SD/- KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DT. 26.4.99 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P2:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT. 26.4.99. P3:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT. 26.4.99. P4:- COPY OF THE RENEWAL OF THE REGISTRATION FOR THE YEAR 2001-02 DT. 30.4.01. P5:- COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.VC4/2001/02 DT. 1.12.01 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE IST RESPONDENT. P6:- COPY OF THE OBJECTION DT. 3,.12.01. P7:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION DT. 3.12.01 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE tss KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- O.P. No.37137 OF 2001 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2008. J U D G M E N T Challenge is on Exhibit P5 notice issued under Section 29A(14) of the K.G.S.T Act, 1963. It is seen that pursuant to the interim order dated 06.12.2001, vehicle has been released also. Therefore, there will be a direction to the competent authority to finalize the proceedings, if not already finalized, within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, with notice to the petitioner. The fate of the steps taken by the petitioner pursuant to the interim order will depend on the order thus passed by the competent authority. There will also be a direction to the second respondent to take appropriate action on Exhibit P7, if not already taken, within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. This original petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp KURIAN JOSEPH, J. O.P.No.37137 OF 2001 J U D G M E N T 22.10.2008