SIL NGE BH ENC 2 C )‘CV’D‘vg I_n the Honble High Court of _ Chhattishgarh g! Bilasgur (C.G._) WP. No. Lifag [2006 Q y Petitioner ............ Raghava Prasad Deshmukh aged 50 years f I \ Son ofAmarnath Deshmukh vn \ Assistant Teacher Government J’ Higher Secondary School, Chandkhuri, Tahsil & district,Durg. XER§E§ wgkesgondent ./. 1. The State Government of Chhattishgarh, Q ." Through the Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) / 2. The Block Education Officer Durg (CG) / Writ petition under articles 226/227 of the Constitution o_f India f_or issuance _o_f writ in the nature o_f MANDAMUS: CertiorariJ Direction Prohibition o_r and directions. other suitable ' WRIT g writs, Order g ordersJ (9 . , HIGH COURT OF CHHATUS6ARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (s) No. 4946 of zoos Pe'ri'tioner : Raghava Prasad Deshmukh Versus Respondents : $fa+e Govt. of Chhaffisgarh & o*hers Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agniham. Ij' Shri Ajay Shrivasfava, Advooa‘re for The Pefitioner. Sm'r. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Gav'r. Advocate for the respondenfs/S‘rai'e. ORDER (11* sep+emben 2006) Learned caunsel appetming for fhe pe‘ri‘rianzr submi'rs +ha1' while working as Assisfam' Teacher, +he pe+ifioner has gone on Training to improve his qualifica'fions on his own expenses and acquired B. Ed. Examina+ion Cer'fifica‘te on 13.1.1997 from Pf. Ravishankar Shukla Universiiy, Raipur. According +0 learned counsel for fhe pe'l'ifioner, 'Hwe peiifioner is en‘ri'i'led to Mo advance incremeni's in View of The decision of“ fhis Cour? in The case of Vashwam Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and ano'iher {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}. This Cour-1' in the case of Yashwan‘l’ Kumor Bharadwoj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and ano‘rher (Supra), came ‘ro 'l'he conclusion fha'i the feachers, who had ob'l'oined B. Ed. @ Examina'rion Cerfificafe on his own expenses, are cover-ed by *he circular dated 24.12.98 (Annexure P/Z) issued by ‘rhe Smfe Governmenf of Madhya Pradesh 3. Learned counsel for fhe pe'ri'rioner fur'rher submi‘l's 'H'm‘l' ‘rhe facts and quesfion of law involved in +he presen'r case are squarely covered by decision cf fhis Cour-f in fhe case of Yashwani’ Kumar Bhuradwuj Vs. Municipal Corpora'rion, Durg and anoiher (Supra), 1'0 which learned counsel appearing for ‘lhe a, responden‘rs fairly concedes and agrees wi'l'h fine avermen'f made by learned counsel appearing for 1’l1e pe'l’i‘i'ioner. 4. Accordingly, i'he wril’ pei'i‘l’ion is allowed in 'l‘erms of line order passed in 'l'he case of Yashwan? Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporafion, Durg and anofher (Supra), subject ‘ro verification of ‘l‘he fac'l' as “lo whefher the pe+i+ioner has acquired B. Ed. n Examinafion Cer'l'ifica‘ie on his own expenses or not No order as 1'0 cosfs. l Sci/— l Satish K.Agnihom l Judge Thakur