1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 629 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.6260 OF 2009 Lt. Col. Dilip Ramchandra Godbole (Retd.) ..Applicant versus M/s. Gavkari Prakashan & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.M.M.Sathaye for the applicant Mr.Pandit for the respondents CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 13th JULY, 2009. P.C: 1. By this application the applicant wants that delay in filing the second appeal be condoned. In the application it is stated that there is delay of 51 days whereas learned Advocate Mr.Pandit states that the correct calculation shows that the delay is of 64 days. Even if we treat the delay as 64 days it is required to be explained. In my view, reading of para Nos.5 and 6 would go to show 2 that the delay in filing appeal was not intentional had been properly explained. It can be condoned. Hence the Order. ORDER Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). There shall be no order as to costs. Office to place the second appeal for admission after removal of the objections. Appellant to give the compilation of the second appeal to learned Advocate Mr.Pandit directly within weeks time from today. (R.Y.Ganoo, J.)