1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3469 OF 2008. IN SUIT NO. 4483 OF 1993. Narayani Mulchand Sachdev : Plaintiff versus Ashok Sevaram Babur & Anr. : Defendants. Shri A.S.Doctor i/by Sonal Doshi and Co. for the Plaintiff. Shri Vinod Pandey i/by Shri S. U. Pandey for the Defendants. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : OCTOBER 22, 2008 P.C. 1. The above Notice of Motion is moved for ad-interim reliefs. However, the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant/Plaintiff submits that he would be satisfied if the Defendants, at this stage, make a statement in terms of the prayer clause (b) of the Notice of Motion. The learned counsel appearing for the Defendants makes a statement in terms of prayer clause (b) of the Notice of Motion. However, he states that the copies of the bills, which have already 2 been paid by the Plaintiffs, have not been furnished to them. Shri Doctor, the learned counsel for the Plaintiffs, states that the issue as regards furnishing the bills would sorted out within a period of two weeks from date. The other contentions raised in the Notice of Motion, one of which is, as regards non-filing of the Written Statement, are explicitly kept open. 2. The learned counsel for the Plaintiff also prays that the hearing of the suit be expedited on account of the fact that the Plaintiff is a senior citizen. 3. The Notice of Motion is, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c). [R.M.SAVANT, J]