(Spl.- H.C.A.S.C.D., 78- e) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA PANAJI, GOA. APPELLATE SIDE DISTRICT : CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 3 OF 2005 _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Quorum, appearances,Court's orders | Court's or Judge's orders of directions and Registrar's orders | _______________________________________________________________________ Petitioner in person. CORAM : A. P. LAVANDE, J. DATE : 17 th FEBRUARY, 2005. P.C. : Heard petitioner in person. By this Revision Application, the petitioner challenges the order dated 29th October, 2004, passed by the trial Court, condoning the delay in bringing the legal representatives of the plaintiff on record in Regular Civil Suit No. 31/1997. 2. The petitioner has submitted that the trial Court has exercised jurisdiction illegally by not counting days properly. According to the petitioner, the interference of this Court is called for to set aside the impugned order. 3. I have gone through the records. I have also gone through the impugned order. By the impugned order, the trial Court has condoned the delay by awarding costs in favour of the defendant. The trial Court has read upon the judgment of Apex Court reported in AIR 2002 SC 1201: Ramnath Sao v/s Gobardhan Sao. 4. I do not find that any jurisdictional error has been committed by the trial Court to warrant interference by this Court. Therefore the Civil Revision Application is summarily rejected. A. P. LAVANDE, J. AN