IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48131 of 2007 MRITYUNJAY KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5/ 23/7/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The allegations are under Section- 498A and 323/34 of I.P.C. and ¾ of D.P. Act. Incompatibility appears to have become an issue when an attempt was taken for reconciliation, but they have again fallen apart. A supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner today states that he undertakes to pay Rs.400/- per month to the daughter born out of the wedlock for her maintenance. This undertaking of the petitioner persuades this Court to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail in the facts and circumstances of the case. This shall be without prejudice to the rights of the minor child to move for maintenance under the laws of the land and any order passed therein shall be supplemental to the present undertaking. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner Mrityunjay Kumar surrender before the court below within four weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.10,000 (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Samastipur in Samastipur Town P.S. Case No.59/2007, subject to the conditions laid down under Section- 438(2) of Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )