IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 22306 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 09.09.2011 Tarsem Lal ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ..Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Bajwa, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Inderpal Singh Parmar, Advocate for complainant/respondent No.2. …… RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in terms of the order passed by this Court on 26.07.2011, the petitioner has already de- posited ` 20,000/- in the court below and also furnished his bail bonds. Learned counsel for complainant/respondent No.2 submitted that the petitioner had the knowledge of the proceedings before the court below and in spite of that he was avoiding his presence before the court be- low, hence, the application deserves dismissal. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the complaint in the present case has been filed by respondent No.2 on account of dishonour of cheque of ` 15,000/-, and ` 20,000/- have already been deposited by the petitioner in the court below which respon- dent No.2 shall be at liberty to withdraw, in my opinion, the petitioner de- serves the concession of pre-arrest bail. Accordingly, interim bail granted to the petitioner on 26.7.2011, is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 09.09.2011 sharmila