IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.8700 OF 2009 1. FEZA HUSSAIN ANSARI @ CHHOTE MIAN, 2. MD. AKHLAK AHMAD @ AKHLAK MIAN 3. ARSAD AHMAD @ CHUNNU MIAN ALL SON OF LATE S. M. NOOR AHMAD 4. SULTANA PRAVIN @ CHHOTI 5. RAJIA KHATOON AFSANA PRAVIN @ RAKHSANA KHATOON 6. NAZRANA KHATOON 4 TO 7 ARE THE DAUGHTERS OF LATE S. M. NOOR AHMAD ALL ARE RESIDENT OF QUARTER NO. 245, KHAGAUL LOCO COLONY, POLICE STATION KHAGAUL, DISTRICT PATNA …………………………………………………………………………….PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. KUDUSIA JAMAL, DAUGHTER OF LATE JAINUL ABEDIN, WIFE OF MD. RAJA HUSSAIN, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA KAZITOLA, POLICE STATION ARA TOWN, DISTRICT BHOJPUR ……………………………………………………………………OIPPOSITE PARTIES ********** 2 11/05/2010 Heard Counsel for the petitioners and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that apart from the allegations leveled against the husband, there is no allegation against any of the petitioners. It is said that the allegation against the petitioners 2 and 3 is that they dropped the informant at the railway station and fled away whereas the allegation against the petitioner no. 5 is that she threw hot water on the hand of the informant. As far as petitioners 1, 4, 6 and 7 are concerned, there appears to be no allegation whatsoever against them in the First Information Report, except general and omnibus allegations. I, therefore, remand the matter back to the Sub 2 Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur as far as petitioners 1, 4, 6 and 7 are concerned which should be decided in the light of the judgement of the Supreme Court in the case of Neelu Chopra and Another vs. Bharti, reported in (2009) 10 Supreme Court Cases 184. This application is dismissed so far as petitioners 2, 3 and 5 are concerned. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)