IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.Rev. (T) No. 56 of 2008 Decided on: 29.10.2010 State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Petitioners. Versus Smt. Bimla Devi …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioners : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the respondent : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The ground taken in this review petition has not been taken before the erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at the time of passing the judgment in OA No. 3639 of 2000 on 17.05.2002. Moreover, the erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal has come to the right conclusion that there was violation of principles of natural justice at the time of terminating the services of the respondent. 2. Consequently, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 29, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?