THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO Writ Petition No.25128 of 2009 Date: 18-11-2009 Between Janapaneni Lakshmi … Petitioner and 1. The Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda, Nalgonda district and 2 others … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO Writ Petition No.25128 of 2009 Oral Order: (per D.S.R.Varma, J.) Heard Sri V.Brahmaiah Chowdary, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader, representing the learned Advocate General, appearing for respondents 1 and 3. 2. This writ petition is filed seeking interference of this Court by way of issuing a Writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the petitioner’s husband, by name J.Janardhana Rao, was taken by the Police into custody on 16-11-2009. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader was directed to get instructions as to the present state of the alleged detenu. Upon instructions, it is reported by the learned Assistant Government Pleader at 2.15 p.m., that the alleged detenu is the father of one J.Naresh, who is accused No.5 in Crime No.141 of 2009 of Chilkur Police Station, Nalgonda district. In that connection, the alleged detenu was called to the police station to enquire the whereabouts of his son and other particulars and after examination, he was let off today morning. It is further informed that the alleged detenu was called to the police station only today morning i.e., on 18-11-2009 but not on 16-11- 2009, as was alleged by the petitioner. 4. There is also no proof forth coming except the blanket allegation that the alleged detenu was arrested on 16-11-2009. If that be the case, there is no plausible reason for the petitioner to keep quiet since 16-11-2009 till today to move a Writ of habeas corpus. Therefore, it appears that the petitioner had resorted to move this Court by way of filing this writ petition only in order to escape the examination by the Police in connection with the offences allegedly committed by their son. 5. For the foregoing, we find no reason, much less valid, to file the present Writ of habeas corpus. In our considered view, this right is being liberally used and quite often misused. 6. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed with costs, at the stage of admission. ___________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA ____________________ JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO 18th November, 2009. Ak