1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4938 OF 1999 WRIT PETITION NO. 4938 OF 1999 WRIT PETITION NO. 4938 OF 1999 Nerul Feriwala Sangh ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Suresh Pakale for Petitioner. Mr. R.S.Apte with Mr. A.A. Garge for R. Nos. 2 and 3. Mr. P.M. Patil, A.G.P. for R. Nos. 1 and 4. ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4284 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 4284 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 4284 OF 2005 Navi Mumbai Hawker’s & Worker’s Union ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Suresh Pakale for Petitioner. Mr. R.S.Apte with Mr. A.A. Garge for R. Nos. 2 and 3. Mr. P.M. Patil, A.G.P. for R. Nos. 1. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DATED : JANUARY 10, 2006 DATED : JANUARY 10, 2006 DATED : JANUARY 10, 2006 P.C. . Both the Petitions are basically in the matter 2 of rights claimed by the hawkers. On behalf of the Corporation, the learned counsel points out that in terms of the Judgment of the Apex court, draft bye-laws have been framed and objections have been invited and after following the procedure, bye-laws will be notified.Considering the above, we find nothing survives in these petitions and it will be open to the Petitioners if finally aggrieved by the bylaws to challenge the same and to raise all objections which they may have including the objections as canvassed in the present petitions. With the above observations, both the petitions stand disposed of. No order as to costs. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.)