HIEH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT RTI ASPUR Wrif Pe'rifion L5) Na. 4998 af 2007 Pa‘ri‘rionar Vmdzv Latchnndani, 5/0 Ln+a Shri Wariyomal Lalchandani, aged about 65 years, Retired Professor, Rasidan'f of Rishi Colony, Dayalband, Bilaspur. Versus Raspandan'rs 1. The Sin-r2 of Chha'H'iSgarh, ‘Hwough the Secremry, Ministry of Higher Eduoa1ion, Sacramriaf Dk Bhuwan, Rnipur (C.G.) 2. The Cammissioner, Higher Education Depariment Government Science College campus, Rnipur (C.G.) Shiksha Samiti 3. C.M.Dubey (Regisfered) ‘rhrough me Chairman, CM. Dubey Pos‘i' Gmdua'i'e, Coliege, Link Road, Bilaspur (C.6.) The C.M.D. Posf Gradume College 'l'hraugh ifs éavzrning body & Ex-officio Secretary/Principal, CM. Dubey College, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT ?ETITOIE UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CGN5TITUTICI‘N 5F INDIA Single Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Salish K. Agnihawi, J. Shri U‘ N. Awasfhy, Senior Advoca‘re wi‘rh Shri M. K. Sinha, Advoaa‘re far ‘I'he pafi‘fioner. 5hri Vashwan‘r Singh Thakur, mpufy Advoaate General for ‘rhe respondents No. 1 and 2. ORAL ORDER (Passed on mis 30* day of April, 2008) 1. This ma‘H'er permins +0 re'fiml dues. This Cour? in file mailer of Wri'l' Pe'l'i'rion No. 4642/2004 (Boijnol'h Mondol Vs. The Sfofe of Chha'H'isgarh & others) and ofher connected ma'H’ers, decided on 31.1.2008, directed 'l‘he Commi'ld'ee +9 consider +he maffer of refriol dues as +he dispu-I'ed question of fads were involved. The Commi‘Hee was constiiu‘red by 'l'he Sfo're Government pursuan‘l' +0 ‘I'ha order dn'red 1.9.6.2006 passed in WPNo. 1961/2006 (Sm‘f. KaJa Bai Chandrakar Vs. $+a+z Govemmenf and n'thers) and order da'tad 13.3.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105/2008 (5mm of Chhn‘r'risgarh and a+hars Vs. Baijnafh Manda! and ano‘l'her). Thus, fhis pz'fi'tion is squareiy covered by fhe judgmeni' and order dafed 31" of January, 2008 passed in WP. Na. 4642/2004 (Baijnafh Manda! Vs. The Siam of Chha'H'isgarh & a‘l'hers) and a'ther' connecfzd ma‘l'fers, as submifred by learned caunszl appearing for fha par-ries. Whh fhe cansen-r af +he par-ties, ‘rhis pan-Hon is accordingly dispasad of in fhz same ferms i.e. fhe office af ‘I'he Advocafe General is directed +0 send 'Hne case 'I'o 'l'he Commm'ee, wi+hin a period of 15 days from fine da+e of receip-r of a copy of +his order. Thereaf'i'er, 'd'ie Commi'f‘tee shall issue nofice fa 1he pe-ri‘l’ioner and The officers concerned, within a furfher period of 15 days. The Commi'rree shall consider and pass order, in accordance wifh law, of‘l’er affording proper opporhmi‘l‘y of hearing 'lo 'l'he pe'l'i‘i'ioner. The pe‘l'i‘i'ioner and 'i'he officer concerned may file addi‘l'ional documen‘l's, if neressnry. The enfire exercise, including paymen'i' of re‘rrial dues, if any, 'l'o fhe pe‘lifioner be completed wifhin a period of four mon‘i'hs from The dafe of receipf of a copy of 'lhis order. Thokur The pe‘i’i'kioner shail suppht exfra copy of’fhe pe'l'i‘l’ion ‘l’o learned counsel appearing for 1'he responden‘l’s, for onward 'l'ransmission 1’0 fhe said commi-Hee. Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge