IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11316 of 2010 DEEPAK KUMAR @ SONU SON OF SRI PRADIP KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, A.P.P. ---------- 2. 19.4.2010 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, which is kept on the record. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the looted jewellery was recovered from the house of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and in case the petitioner delays it deliberately, it will be viewed adversely when he renews his prayer for bail. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )