PETITIONERS 1 RESPONDENTS 1 §£ HIGH COURT OF CHI-IAT’I‘ISGARH, BILASPUR W.P. (S) No. 6601 of 2007 Ratnu Lal Vermag Aged 38 years, S/o Late Shri Rameshar Ram, Assistant Teacher, Govt. F'Itimaxy School, Gataparkala, Block Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Smt. Annibeseut Lal Aged 5O years W/ o Late Shri Rajcndra Kumar Lal, Assistant Teacher Bapu Primaxy School No. — 14, Station Para ward No. - 1 1 Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus The State Government of Chhatu'shgarh, Through the Secretary, Education 85 Tribal Department, D . K. S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) The District Education Otlicer, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) r WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shn’ Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Pradeep Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J Heard on admission. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have passed B.T.I. examination on their own expenses, therefore, they are entitled to receive two advance increments according to circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.08.1999. He also submits that in many identical matters, the petitions have been alloWed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwai Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2006' (H) MPJR-CG 96}. He submits that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the said judgment. ORAL ORDER (31.10.2007) 2 £$ W.P.(S) N0. 6601/2007 This legal position is not disputsd by the leamed counsel for the State. However, he submits that the order may be passed in terms of the said judgment, but it shall be subjected to veriiication regarding petitioners’ such qualification. Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Comoration, Burg and another (Supra) Subject to verification of the facts as to whether the petitioners had acquired B.T.I. Examination Certiiicate on their own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further Whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. The petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to costs. I vatti t Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha I Judge