IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 2ND AUGUST 2011 / 11TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 19559 of 2011(T) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SANTHOSH K., S/O. GOPALAKRISHNAN .K., KOTTEMMAL HOUSE, POONGODE P.O., THUVVUR (VIA), MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE, ADV. SRI. S. SUJIN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT – 676 518. 2. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT – 676 518. R1 & R2 BY SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW,S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/08/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.19559/2011-T: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE MARK LIST ISSUED BY THE R.1. TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE APPLICATION REVALUATION OF PAPER JAVA-INTER-NET PROGRAMMING. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR SCRUTINY OF PAPER JAVA-INTER-NET PROGRAMMING. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR PHOTOCOPY OF PAPER JAVA-INTERNET PROGRAMMING. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RECTIFICATION OF PAPER JAVA-INTERNET PROGRAMMING. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.1. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.2. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 19559 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 2nd day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner was a student for BCA Course in the SNDYSS College, Perinthalmanna affiliated to the Calicut University. He filed this writ petition with the prayer to direct the University to conduct scrutiny of the petitioner's answer paper in the practical, viz., Paper No.5 (Java and Internet Programming) and verify the marks obtained by him in the two papers. There is a further prayer to direct the University to furnish the aforesaid answer papers to the petitioner. 2. A statement has been filed by the University, para 2 of which being relevant reads as under:- “2. The above writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to conduct a scrutiny of the petitioner's answer paper in practical viz. Paper No.5 Java and Internet Programming and verify the marks obtained in the 2 papers and also for a direction to the respondents to furnish the petitioner copies of his two answer papers. It is submitted that these two papers mentioned by the petitioner are practical papers and these are not retained by the University after the awarding of marks. in the above circumstances, the University is not in a position to provide the answer-sheets of the practical examinations written by the petitioner nor provide an opportunity for scrutiny”. WPC No. 19559/11 :2 : 3. Thus, according to the University, the papers are not retained and in such a situation there arise no question of granting the reliefs sought for in this writ petition. However, learned counsel for the University assures that the marks as entered by the Chief Examiner will be verified and that will be communicated to the petitioner. This the University may do. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp