^'^.. :(t.^^%--' -p ^ ..•••^A' U^9 ,,.^^ t^ \^^(^ t-7 "^<^"' k^'"" m THE HON9BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. S.NO. ^3 1 OF 2009 PETITIONER :/ Bali Ram Chaurasia S/o Shri Chaitu Ram, aged about-52 years, Head Master Government Girls Middle School, Surangpani Block- Pathalgaon Distt. Jashpur(C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS yl. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) ^2. Commissioner, Tribal Development, Raipur, (C.G.). ^ 3. Assistant Conimissioner, Tribal Development, Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Pathalgaon, Distt. Jashpur(C.G. PETITIOH UNDER ARTZCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^h HtSMCOURJ_OF_CHHATTiSGARH_LBLLASPUR VVRJIPETiIiONlS)Jsia_73910F1009 PET!TSONER Baii Ram Chaurasia RESPONDENTS Versus of Chhattisgarh & Others Gowri Writ Petition under Artlcie 226, of the Constitution of India) Singte Bench : Hon'bSe Shri Satish K. Agolhotri, J< Present:- Shri V.K. Sinha, counsei for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate forthe Stats. (ORAU ; (Passed on this 5th day'of February. 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that against the order dated 31-3-2008 (Annexure - P/1), the petltioner has preferred a statutory appeal'before the Commissioner, TribaS Welfare Department, on 27-9-2008 (Annexure - P/3). Thereafter, requests vyere raade on 31-3-2009 and 20-5-2009 (Annexure.- P/4). The Appellate Aythority has not taken any actlon ors the pendlng ..appeal« Learned counse! prays that the respondenit authoritles rnay be directed to conslder and declde the peodirsg appeal. of the petitioner, 2. At this juncture, tearned counsel appearing for the State'subrrslts that if the appea! is stlii pending, the same shall be considered and decided expeditious!y withln the reasonable time< 3. Sn view of foregoing, the respondent No.2 is directed to exarnSne the statutory appeal preferred by the petitioner, as afore-stated, andl declde the same, in accordance with iaw and on its own merits, as eariy as possible preferably within a period of Q frorn the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. 4. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of< Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge