IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19381 of 1999 1. SUNIL KUMAR S/O LATE BAM SAO, R/O VILL-GOBINDPUR, P.O. AND P.S.FATUHA, DISTT- PATNA. 2. KAPILDEO PRASAD S/O LATE MAUJI SAO 3. RAJENDRA PRASAD S/O KAPILDEO PD. BOTH R/O MATHURIA MOHALLA P.O. AND P.S.FATWAH, DISTT-PATNA……PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ……………………………………………….. OPP. PARTY with Cr.Misc. No.19545 of 1999 1. KAPILDEO PRASAD S/O LATE MAUJI SAO 2. RAJENDRA PRASAD S/O KAPILDEO PD. BOTH R/O MATHURIA MOHALLA P.O. AND P.S.FATWAH, DISTT-PATNA……PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR……………………………………………….. OPP. PARTY with Cr.Misc. No.20282 of 1999 1. KAPILDEO PRASAD S/O LATE MAUJI SAO 2. RAJENDRA PRASAD S/O KAPILDEO PD. BOTH R/O MATHURIA MOHALLA P.O. AND P.S.FATWAH, DISTT-PATNA. 3. GOPAL SAH S/O LATE SUGAR SAH, R/O-VILL-GOVINDPUR P.O. AND P.S.FATWAH, DIST-PATNA……………………….....PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR……………………………………………….. OPP. PARTY ----------- 6. 29-Apr-2010 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner in any of these three analogous quashing applications. They are dismissed for non prosecution. The interim order shall stand vacated. The court below should expedite the proceeding so that the case may be disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)