:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5598 OF 2004. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5598 OF 2004. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5598 OF 2004. IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.313 OF 2001. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.313 OF 2001. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.313 OF 2001. Rajaram Nathuram Shirke. ..Applicant. Versus. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. ---- Mr.R.S.Kate, advocate for the applicant. Smt. V.R.Bhosale, APP for the State. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 14, 2004. DATE : DECEMBER 14, 2004. DATE : DECEMBER 14, 2004. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. This is a successive application for extending time to surrender after the confirmation of the conviction and sentence. The ground made is that the applicant has received the certified copy of the order of this Court recently and the applicant cannot move to the Supreme Court. In our opinion, that cannot be a ground for extending time to surrender. We are not inclined to grant extension of time to surrender. Application is rejected and accordingly disposed of. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (S.B.MHASE,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (S.B.MHASE,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (S.B.MHASE,J.) :2: Login:ast/sbm.