IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.5714 of 2011 Date of Decision : March 30, 2011. Balwant Singh .....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.B.S.Baath, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct the officials respondents to take disciplinary/criminal action against respondent Nos.6 to 8 who are the Revenue Officers, for their alleged act of mis-placement of mutation No.8262. The above-stated action is sought on the basis of enquiry reports dated 10.3.2003 and 12.9.2003 (Annexures P-3 & P-4) as well as the subsequent enquiry report (Annexure P-7) said to have been conducted by the Vigilance Bureau. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any views on the merits of the allegations made by the petitioner, moreso when respondent Nos.6 to 8 have not been heard at this stage, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction C.W.P.No .5714 of 2011 2 to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to consider the complaints/representations said to have been submitted by the petitioner and/or treat this writ petition as representation on his behalf and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. March 30, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE