IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13022 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 27, 2010. Sarwan Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vikas Bali, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved at the order dated 14.5.2010 (Annexure P-1) which has been further upheld in appeal vide order dated 2.6.2010 (Annexure P-2) whereby the petitioner's application for renewal of his Arms licence has been kept pending till the decision of two criminal cases registered against him. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records. In my considered view, it is jot expedient for this Court to form any opinion in respect of the allegations levelled against the petitioner and no interference with the impugned orders is called for except to safeguard the interest of the petitioner to the extent that in the C.W.P.No .13022 of 2010 2 event of his exoneration/acquittal and/or quashing of the criminal cases, he undoubtedly would be entitled to seek renewal of his Arms licence in accordance with law. Disposed of. Dasti. July 27, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE