IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 378 of 2011 Decided on: February 25, 2011. Veena Devi. ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K.Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner: Ms. Bhawna Dutta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayer: “ i) That the services of petitioner be regularized from the date of his appointment, i.e. 28.2.2008 and shall be given all the consequential benefits from the date of appointment.” 2. A similar issue was considered by this Court leading to Annexure P-4, judgment. In case the petitioner is also similarly situated, a similar treatment as extended to the petitioners in Annexure P-4, judgment shall be extended to the petitioner herein also. The needful in this regard shall be done within a period of three months from the date of production of the copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the judgment referred to above, by the petitioner before the second respondent. 3. The Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. February 25, 2011. ( Justice V.K. Ahuja ), (karan) Judge.