w \^v '^ \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION No. ^77 OF 2004 PETITIONER RESPO <»•' SPO^DENTS ^••f^.. ss^€^ .--:"^;^JX^ <.'^^Q.^'* .^w ^ ^ ^ ^'..^" ^ \^w ^ V^X.l .- €/]WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE ^•^r^^^ CONSTn-UTION OF INDIA M/s. Ramnivas Agrawal, a Proprietorship firm through partner Rajendra Kumar Agrawal, aged about 43 years, S/o Shri Ramnivas Agrawal, resident of Naila, District Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Public Works, D. K. S. Bhawan, Mantralaya/Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Engineer-In-Chief, Public Works Departrment, Civil Lines, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Raigarh Division, District Raig^Fh (Ch^attisgarh) THE -••^%^ L_. .^? VJ i LL XI-HC—78 ^-^r^TfN^ "cTO^I^T-^lNF ^•^^^ -;r2'->?f:^-^^ *18*1^ ^^11^' ^Ef "^TpTRTq, ^Tli-y^!^, f^<dl^^< _ ,tA;.A^-77/z^4- ^rw"""""---"--"-/-'--""'"'^200 ^I^?T TT^T ('^lf^l^?) i^T^^jft^3^T 24.02.2004 Shri Saiaeer Behar, Shri Raabir Singh, advaiice copy, Heard, Ajdvocate for fhe petitioner. Govt, Advocate for the State on f4ed respond^nts The petitioner has on the part of the of biUs of flie petitioner, wjiicli on the constniction of rosld petitiouer has been subm which have not been cons: paid by the respondents, Couusel for tlie petitji< be served if a direction is| dtrected to decide fhe samd Havuig considered f4< and niaterial on. record, i|i justice would be ser^ed tf w^f^N 'w^ff ^ 1^xzt ^P^R ^ ^tfn^ ^n^r this petition agaiast the(iiiaction who are not releasiag the amoiuit he had subniitted after caiiyiag . Couusel further szibmits ttiat flie |tted fhe nuniber of representations, Idered, and fhe amouut has not been petitjioner subditted that his puipose will given to hira to file a representation afresh before tlie respondjents and tiie respondents raay be sam^ wiftini stipulated tiiae. facts aad circurastaiices of fhe case the opiaion of this Court, ends of direction is given to fhe petitioner to XI.HC—78 sn-^r^i^iw ^mw^T5^ <eJ> /<.c..^^^. M^l +• ^^ '^^TRRT^, Wi^-H^, f^TRTy: W<^V(9.7?/z^o4- ^W^ff ^^ii^ -^200 ^T^T ^R^ (^f:^?) ^riN ^^ -I- niake a detaiied representat^c before the coBipetent auth|ority/respondents froin today aiid on such shatl be considered add authoiity/respondents iii ^ possible preferably wittiiti of representation, If the gri<| may file afresh petition. Wifh the dii'ection afor Consequently, M.W.P. also staiid disposed of, Certified copy as per n r^preseutation behig filed, tb.e same decided by fhe corapetent Lccordance with law as early as tl^ree nionths from. the date of receipt 'vaiice still subsists, tlie petitioner thlree cbS^(d41'l ^R^? ^ 1^1 ^R$K ^ 3tfw3n^T )H alongwith a copy of tiiis petition wifhin a Bionfh ^said, this petition is disposed of. ^o. 62/2004andI.A. No. 178/2004 A les, Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^ '^^