IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3659/2008 IN ITXAL 3303/2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3659/2008 IN ITXAL 3303/2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3659/2008 IN ITXAL 3303/2008 Conwood Agencies Pvt.Ltd. .. Appellant Vs. Asst.CIT Range 9(1) Mumbai & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.S.J.Mehta for the Appellant. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Respondents. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. V.C.DAGA, JJ. V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATE : 17th November, 2008 DATE : 17th November, 2008 DATE : 17th November, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The learned Counsel for the Respondents undertakes to file his vakalatnama within a period of two weeks from today. 2. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 98 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)