HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH CONTEMPT CASE No. 1310 of 2010 O R D E R: This contempt case is filed by the petitioner seeking to punish the respondents for disobeying the orders passed by this court in WP No. 8267 of 2006 dated 12-10-2009 willfully and deliberately u/Sec. 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. 2. The petitioner filed the above writ petition seeking a writ of Mandamus to direct to respondents-authorities to take all necessary steps to effect payment of exgratia to the petitioner in lieu of the lands in survey No. 542 in an extent of Ac.5.00cs of Kothur village of Shameerpet Mandal, which was taken from his possession in the year 2001; and to declare the action on the part of the respondents in not considering his request/representation dated 11-11-2003 as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and contrary to Article 21 of the Constitution of India. 3. In the above writ petition, this Court by order dated 12-10-2009 passed the following order: “Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, respondent No.4 is directed to consider the case of the petitioner in respect of the land that was assigned to him by proceedings B/683/92 dated 04-05-1992 and pass necessary orders, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” 4. Counter Affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent No.4. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in respect of the relief sought for in the writ petition, the petitioner stated to have been made a representation dated 11-11-2003 to the respondents and the same has not been considered by the respondents. 5. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 5th respondent- corporation submits that in respect of the land acquired for the 5th respondent, necessary compensation has already been deposited to the Collector. 6. It is stated that in compliance of the orders passed by this Court in the above writ petition, the 4th respondent-Tahsildar issued Proceedings No. B/329/2010 dated 06-09-2010. The operative portion of the Proceedings reads thus: “The writ petitioner Sri G.Jagadishwar S/o Janardhan Rao is claiming the land in Sy.No.542 to an extent of Ac.5.00 gts situated at Kolthur Village by virtue of Proceedings issued by the then MO vide file No. B/683/92 dated -05-1992. Efforts have been made to trace out the said file, the said file is not traceable. The PR/DRR pertaining to the year 1992 are also not available. The settled law is that whenever the assignment is made, the name of the assignee will be implemented in the subsequent pahani as Lavani Pattedar& Possessor duly sanctioning the Lavani Izfa in the concerned Faisal Patti. On verification of revenue records the name of so called assignee Sri G.Jagadishwar S/o Janardhan Rao has not been recorded in revenue Records as Pattedar nor Possessor from the year 1992 to till date and Lavani Izfa has also not been sanctioned in the Faisal Patti for the year 1992-93, which goes to show that the assignment claimed by the Writ Petitioner is irregular assignment. Even as per G.O.Ms.No.1409 Rev. (Q) Dept., dated 19-08-1978 the Govt. of A.P. has issued ban orders on assignment. “All blocks of Govt. lands exceeding 15 acres whether in a single Survey Number or more shall not be assigned for the present as the APIIC may require them for locating industrial areas. T hat corporation will examine the suitability of such blocks for industrial purpose in the mean time and report. When upon orders will be issued for release for assignment of such of these blocks as may not be required for the corporation.” In terms of above said G.O. the total land in Sy.No.542 of Kolthur village is Ac.371.12 gfts. And in compact block and the individual assignment can not be considered, the assignment claimed vide file No. B/683/92 in Sy.No.542 by the present writ petitioner Sri G.Jagadishwar stands to be irregular assignment. In pursuance of the orders of the Hon’ble High Court in WPMP No. 25447/02 in WP No.20284/02 dated 20-10-2002 that the petitioners shall not be disposed except by paying compensation on ex-gratia as the case may be in accordance with law, in respect of land bearing Sy.No.542 of Kolthur village, the then MRO Shamirpet Mandal has identified (124) eligible persons for payment of ex-gratia ion file No. B/10/2002 and submitted a report to the Collector, R R District on 11-03-2003. Subsequently alienated the land in favour of ICICI Ltd., to an extent of Ac.71.00 gts in Sy.No.542 vide G.O.Ms.No.978, dated 17-12-1998 and an extent of Ac.291.00 gts alienated to APIIC Ltd., vide G.O.Ms.No. 713 dated 23-06-2003 and possession handed over to the said organizations. Even in the said finalized list the name of present writ petitioner Sri G.Jagadishwar S/o Janardhan Rao is not found, which goes to show that the writ petitioner was never in physical possession of land in Sy.No.542 of Kolthur village. In the above said circumstances, the request of the petitioner for inclusion of his name in the compensation record of beneficiaries or in the alternative to assign suitable government land cannot be considered.” 7. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the fact that the respondents have already complied with the order passed by this court in WP No. 8267 of 2006 dated 12-10-2009 by issuing proceedings No. No. B/329/2010 dated 06-09-2010, no further orders are necessary to be passed in this Contempt case. 8. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed. However, it is open to the petitioner to assail the validity of the proceedings No. B/329/2010 dated 06-09-2010 issued by the 4th respondent in accordance with law. No costs. _____________ 07-10-2010. Note: CC by one week B/o Mjl/*