1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7009 OF 2009 Nandkishor Chotulal Khichi, Age-53 years, Occu:Nil, R/o-Nagapur, M.I.D.C., Ahmednagar. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS 1) Principal Secretary, Home Department, Maharashtra State, Mumbai. 2) The Director General of Police, Office of Director General of Police, Mumbai, 3) The Superintendent of Police, Ahmednagar, Dist-Ahmednagar. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Mr.N.C. Khichi, party in person for Petitioner. Mr.R.P. Phatke Additional Government Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.U. CHANDWAL, JJ. DATE : 5TH NOVEMBER, 2009. PER COURT : 1. Heard party in person. According to party in person 2 he was selected as police constable on 26th June, 1979 but he was not allowed to work as police constable since the year 1979. He made several representations to the authorities concerned. The party in person submits that Original Application was preferred by him to Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal being Original Application No. 451 of 2009. The same came to be dismissed by order dated 22nd September, 2009. We have perused the said order. We have even perused the communication made by Superintendent of Police addressed to the Police Commissioner dated 16th January, 2009. 2. It is the case of the Respondents that there is no record of Petitioner's being appointed as police constable and even it was there, the same was destroyed. 3. We find that there is abnormal delay on the part of the party in person in approaching the Court. According to the party in person he was appointed as Police constable in 1979. The party in person approached the Tribunal in the year 2009. We are not satisfied with the explanation given by the party in person in approaching the Court at such a belated stage. There 3 are serious latches on the part of the party in person. We do not find any illegality in the observations made by the Tribunal in dismissing the Original Application. In exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction, no interference is called for. Writ Petition is therefore dismissed. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/NOV09/wp7009.09