HIGH CGURHIGH QOURT OF CHHA?T§SGARH: 3ILA$PUR Writ Pefiiion (S), No. 71 610’? 2667 Fetaticner Someshwar Dewangan, Sm. $hri Bhagwati Pl'asad Dewangan, Age about 34 years, Asst’t. Teacher, Govt. M§ddie Schcoi, Kobiya, B§ock-Bemetara, Distt. Durg (CG). Fiea'sus \f Respondents 1) Siate Govt» of Chha‘tiisgarh, through ihe $ecretary. Educatien & Tribai WeKare Deparimenf, DKS. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2) District Education Officer, Bemetara, mstt-Darg (CG). {Writ Petition undér Article 226 of the Conatiiution of mdia} S$: Hon’bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotris J‘ ¥¥é§é§i€wW73EX"Aga‘gETéFiFixlééfé§éféb§f¥§é¥f5i“{Eé’gié§i%idfié?W " Shié A‘s. Kacahawaha, GQV'L Advacat<a far thg S‘Eaie. ORAL 6R§ER (Passed an smaecembey, 2mm Leamed counset appearing far the petitmrier as weik as fci" the Stateirespondents jointiy submat that the facts and question of Saw tnvoived in the present writ petition are squarely Coveree by the decision ef this Ccurt in the case of Yasnwant Kumar Bhataciwaj Vs. Munictpal corporation, Burg ami anotherz 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has painted out the circuiar dated 13-9-1§74 (Annexure PM), where under according te the petitioner, the petitioner, who had obtained B.Ed., examinatien certificate before appointment, is aiso entitied to twin) advance increments. The respondentsIState, while considering the cases of the petitioners, shaii grant the reiief, in accordance with the circuiar (supra). 3 2006 (1r): Merit—CG 96 \K uq circuiars ciated 24-12—19g8 and $349.99 anti furiher whether he has' been paid éwa advance incmmems m mt. Na order as to casts. za}u Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri f Judge 3) Far the aiarementioned reasons, :he writ petéticn iS désp0$ed of in terms of the decision af this Court in the matte? cf Yashwant Kamar gharadwaj (supra), subject is verification of the fact as ta whei’her the petitioner has acquired B.Ed., certificate at his own expenses as per the