SlSiGLE ^? (S) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRIT PETITION f227) N0. \^^ OF 2010 PETITIONER Applicant v^ ..*^ .*' ^%^... VA'".--'\'^A>"" ...••* •^"'.•^ .-.jY^np .,.--5^ ^^0"'" ^•"M^-"" ^yw' ^^' >^0 ^•^' ^ .^' VERSUS Rajesh Dubey @ Rajesh Sharma, S/o late Shri Murli Prasad Dubey, aged about 40 years, Advocate, R/o Behind Police Line, Ward No. 14, Nayapara, Bemetara, Tahsit Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.) Smt. Sarita Dubey @ Munnu, W/o Rajesh Dubey, Daughter of late Shri BhagWandhar Diwan, aged about not known, R/o Mukut Nagar (Lakhe Nagar), Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE mN^TTTUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENT Non-Applicant HC-22 3TT^I^T f^ira'3^T 5b4-!i<^ ^{ffd Deepti ~?^[ ^i^sid4, ^Tit^^Kc, t^RTrer^; 3Tit?T ^^ _.^.fe^.)....l%^f ri° ^.>^.....^^......^............ ^^ ^IH^llT^HI^ W^T^^TTW^f^ -L-. SB : Hon^bte Shri Manindra Mohan JShrivastava, J. 22-04-2010 Shri-P.P.Sahu, counselfbrthe pe{:itioner. Heard on admission. By this petition under Article 227 assaited legatity and validity of order betow has rdjected petitioner's appli^ation respondent Submission of the learned coun^ ground raised in the petition seekin^ application was made and the learned Qourt rejecting theapptication. In the impugned order, it has that report of the counsetor has settlement are going on. Further, it has| below that respondent has been regula|-ly her conduct it is not reflected that she Taking into consideration that pr^ the report regarding possibility of settletlnent the opinion of this Court rejection of th^ from any jurisdictional illegality and p^rversity interfere with the impugned order date{ tiberty to the petitioner to move an app| appropriate stage ofthe trial in the With the aforesaid tiberty', the petjtion jofthe Constitution of India, petitioner has c|ated 23/1/2010 by which tearned Court for medical examination of the i^el for the petitioner is tiiat in view of the divorce, which has been disputed, below committed serious ittegaiity in b^en '^WfepfhT TfR^Tf ^ ft1c^ iF^i^K IFT STf^R ^3?T^ be^i suffers recorded by the tearned Court below ptaced which shows that efforts for jbeen also observed by the learned Court appearing before the Court and from from any mentat imbalance. ^sently the case is at the initial stage and has been submitted in the Court, in application at this stage does not suffer am therefore not inclined to 23^1/2010. t would however reserve ication for such examination at later and eventjsetttementfaiis between the parties. is finally disposed of Sd/- ManindraMohanSbrivastava Judge [^ -^fe^ 1