"ri I c6 i-F~H cl- p Ot) P-P- )-j <U .i-t. Q O fc3- CO 3 CT'^.CB "-i y'".: • '^ y: ^B®°1S<~1' Cl~ .c<i.,^' O? ro ;..' ^-'a-ia^:®1^)-1- ...<B p-gjW Q SB •.ffl.1' . M^^: ',(0 •0 » C+ <tW, h-';'iu:..B'<iS H • ^,&^^^^.' tfCS ; CD"'<! (B . ^d- '•.,;.:.: f^:^. '&l'rt-p'p'.cs'SB.'.''. ••f*^^s» »^:' .ili(i}gi-"..tnl')-i0 " '.'. y.h'w m .^ .» :t»;p' F5»'<D''~ '<iii i-!".</1 . W :(]S:,'. flclyt'lp.p' rtem P}I(B.QI l-'fl) W^Sw^'. B .to-.m l.'i^m t"i rt .(B H i-I;i-t;(t>- s> i-4- • ^ ;l-':ffi-s! o B" O <'r<"<; '!si;:s:"-l::'-l-!3'l^.» H-I-II'I-'- • c<'(b^ i:'H','ct-p,;H.'^, i-":l-'tj-jn.l:g:,;', (n-,'jto O :;'"<;', Ei¥1-< ' goti-3'u ,(B 13' .'&.?'. w...;:, ss.-Wf-'v-t'sS'' :^<*;'... ^^•^fSW& ffl'n'o-o.ffl' W;o">t3 .M;_..[B.^iiB;.0>'.^';;,..:. I'sillil'.^ "ffl';;hJ6;^.<SWS ^' sBffi2-<^s'w,ta. hiog g. dl :l-;c<- '•l;B.ro:./'..,.;b'!B.- '''-ifi.Sr'fe^'''. ? ro 'cf(D grrt->eiC<t m (» i[o^ff'^^-.,^-' . (B (B:;t-"£?<> ' . W-"->-i,,,-?'i-l : ' V;Q 'MG' ~ : "!;-:<!'^:^l'-il;^ls: " . '<i)'$:;,l'l-J.;M i-l'l-'- • -^ f^Wo W '|l91'ft^rt^:K. ^l^g®^:' t? fe XI-HC-22 3ii^r^i h-u'h sn^t s^+iicn yiia i'ss^. SBSEISIiSSST' -^sf -i)|t)i<.)^ (?Ti)'y'l<o, facii'My _(:- W^WI 9>W* 3TI^T TRtq? ^•/t///37 '•^ 200 f^^T' aii^tTOnw^ifN QIVISIOH BENCH: HQN'SLE MR. L.C.3KADOO fe HON'BLE MR, DHIRENDRA MISHRA, JJ 08.03.2006 Dr. ShaUesh Ahuja, Advoc^te for the appeBaat. Mr. LLN.S. Deo, Additionsll Public Pl-osecutor with Mr. M.P.S. Bhatia, Panel Lawver for tfae Stat Qral judgmeut dictated on Per L.C. Bitadoo, J Sessions Judge after holdiag coniinittnis iniuder of Podiyami 302 of tfae Indian Penal (\ sffect that. in fhc evening of29,I3 daiaaging the crop of deceased his housc, bro'dght aa. axc aud ^ r^ \ <^l^fo4t'1 ^T-l-Rll' ^ r&l^t ^^K ^TsiPgHsn^r Dais. By this appcal undcr Scc^ion 374 (2) oi' thc Cr.P.C. appcUant Podiyaiai Liaga has questioaed ^ie legality & coirectness ofjudgDieat of couviction aad onier of seilitence dated 16.8.1996 passed fcv leained Sessions Judge, Jagaalptur in S.T,No.71/95, whereby leanied fhe accysed/appellaiit guilt"/ tbr IPaadu convicted him iiiulcr Scction <-UL.'~I t tode and sentencea to yndergo HnprisonmeB.t for life. The prosecution case; in 1(>rie.f, is that Podiyami Dorba(PW-4j lodged the report (Ex.P-S) ia f(ie Police Station. Dante";ada to the .1994, fhc hcn ofaccuscd Podivami Linga eniercd ia the Idtctien aatdeu of deceased Pandu and started Pandu. on wtuch Pandu asked the accused Linga as to why he is n|ot keepiag the hen in his house and soiae altercation took place betat'eeii fhein, The accused went iaslde ittacked Paadu with the axe fhricc on [Tft^ ^tSi^ XI-HC-22 ^S[ •^l'4H'l|, tSfll^'IS, i«IWI'M1< ^-^ 311^1'W R(-<i.'=ti 311^1 ^tri^ ^fficf ?'tes'^^ i-^Sff3;3: MiMpii'g?iiRR •M 200 fq^g' fais head as a resiut ofwhich Pan(du received itijuries on ttie vital part of fhe body aad succuiabed to tjie iujuries sustaaied by him on the spot. Aftcr itgistemig fhc casc, I Panchiiama (Bx.P-1) of the bodj possession the blood stEsinedsoii of ofience Le. axe under Ex.P-71 ^)T^rfwftTf TTR^ff ^ fe^ <^1^l< ^ 3?PtpT an^r ivcstieatm.g Officcr lcft for thc sccne of pccurrence and after givlng i^otlce to the Paaca.as preparcd fhe ? of deceased Paadu. He took into and plaia sofl. iinder Ex.P-2, weapon aad sent the bodv of deceased for postinortcin cxamination to P^ssiasy Hcalth Ccntre, Daatcwada, where Dr. K.L. Suryavaashi (pW-6) conducted the postiaortem exaurination on the body of dec^ased aad prepared the postmortem. report (Ex.P-7). After coiupletion of uivesti^ation, charge sheet was filed agauist tlic accuscd/appcllaxit in thi recordcd thc stateinent of accu; the Cr.P.C. in which he denied against him, Leamed Sessions Jydge & scntcnccd thc accuscd iu thc] fhls judgiaent. Court of Judicial Magistratc, Dantewada, who in tura comin^tted tiie case to feamed Sesslons Jiidge, Jagdalpiir for trial, whet¥ the proseciition examiaed seven wiuiesses ui Qiuer to est^ibusti tfae cliarge agam.st tlie accused/appeUaat. On fhe ott|er baad, leanaed Sessions Judge L^ed/ appcBant under Scction 3 13 of fhe prosecutlon 'evidence appearm( after hearing the argunien.ts of Additional PubUc Prosecutor eaad eounsel for the accused, convicted inaiuicr as nieiitioncd in Para 1 of [^\5 ^ioq y^\ XI-HC-22 311^1 ^iT f?;IR?31lt?[ •gTqwafgg ittteEKt; i:u!:';f'^e^., •s^ -iii^M^, riTtl'yji<», fawwy iiini sh*iict> "m, 200 te^T' .317^1 TOfTW ^fef Lasfvcr abttut cpop We have heard Dr. accused/appeliant aad Mr, U.N.! •witll Mr. M.P.S. Bhatia, Paacl Homicidal deatb. of deceasefl As far as mvolvement of question is coucemed, fhe crune 3}, soa of tiie deceased, who ha4 fafeftil day ia thc eycning at Linga were damagiag the paddy asked Liaga as to whv he is iiotl tttey are damaguig tus crop. H( house, brousht an axe aad attacl fhrcc tiincs as a result of wruc9 sustaineu bv him. in tfae cros defencc has not been able to evidence of this wituess unreliayie evidence of this stajads Suiyavanshi (PW-6), who has ttirce mcised wouads on the he; skull was fractured iato piece^, taateriai was couitug out finni ffajf ui nature, In vicw of thc abovc K.L. 5un'avanshl(FW-6), the crime ia qiiestion is established. corrobdrated itAted «tii<<I<n<ili HiH<ii^1s'zt<In^K i; aiPw sn^l Shailesh AJiui'a, Advocafe for S. Deo.AdditionaiPubiicProsecutor for tlic Statc/respondent. Podivajiu Pajidu is not iu dispute. |the accused/appeBant m. criiae in l^vas witnessed by Sodi Bainan (FW- t steted in his evidence that on tlte 4 to 5 p.m.. the facn of accuscd ofdeceased Pandu, on which be beepiag the hen in his comrol, as ;aruig ttus Lniga went tnsiri.e t&e ted Pandu wifh tlie axe on his head f •. -"- Paiidu succuDibcd to fhe injuiics ts-examtaation of thls witaess ttie t'licit any thiug, which makes tlie or untruatworthy. Moreover ttie bv the evidence of Dr. K.L. iii his cvidcncc titiat fhere wcic td of deceased as a result of which |, braiu was also niptiu'ed, hraia [e injuries aiid death was honucttial cvidcjicc of Sodi Bainaa (PW-3) aiid Dr. mvc(lvement of ttie accused/appellaiit in {xit^^f^ XI-HC-22 sn^f^i R-ti'* 3D§?I wiwgf??! m Kosnan? ,/•¥ ' 'T ^ ~s^( •^Wv\'ui, ^ifly'i'a, r««Yii«y sn^r TR^? IIICTI gvqrai •M 200 sn^T^RlieR^ifttT Learaed coiinsei fbr the offence against fhe accused/appel^ant -304 Part-II oftllc Indiaa Penal Code. On tfae otlier haad, leamed State supported fhe ianpugned jud fement Having heard leamed coun^el the evidence, record aa weB as judj Perusal of cvidencc of Sodi Paadu asked tfae accysed Liaga they were damagmg his crop. Hjc reason, 'ihe aceused went iuside| attacked fhrice on fhe head of bonc of Paadu was tumcd iato pi( out aad he dicd spontaacouslv. / • • • • ' accused assaulted tlie deceased oit fhe daager weapoa like axe, it caiij assaulted ffae deceased wifh the inll a|;cused/appeUaiit argued tbat Uie does not travel bevond Section For the foTcgoing icasons, w there is no iilegality or iafirmity The appeat being devo.id of acc(Mp.uigly, it is dismissed. Sd/- l L.C.BHADOO A Judge meiiit ^Tl^'ql-^ •Hftt'lt'^ l^l ^Rri.n ^Tsri^iitan^t Additlonal Public Prosecutor ibr tfae ofthe trial Court.. .^el for the parties, we have pei-used Lfeinent of fhe trial court. i^aiuan (PW--3) icvcals that dcccased fco keep the hen in his coatrol, as Searing fhis, withoiit any rhyme or the house, brought fhe" axe and as a result of whicb the skuB ;ccs, brain inaterial started comiag T)herefore, the maaner in which the his vital part ofthe body and with safely be taferred that fhe acoused lltention to cause his death, are of the considered opinion fhat jn the judgment of fhe trial court. is liable to be disinissed and Paladu -^- •< l^ ^ ^^Kg^i