IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.931 of 2009 Lachhan Yadav, son of Late Biehwanath Yadav, resident of village- Ujjain Lohiyara, Tola, Sinha, P.S. Harsidhi, District- East Champaran. .. Opposite party-Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Mira Devi, w/o Lachhan Yadav, 3. Sangita Kumari, D/o Lachhan Yadav. Both resident of village- Sangrampur Mathia, P.S.- Sangrampur, District- East Champaran. .. Applicant-Opposite parties. ----------- 4. 23.08.2011 This application has been filed under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against the order dated 13.5.2009 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Motihari in Matrimonial Case No. 14 of 2009 by which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.2400/- per month as maintenance to his wife and his daughter. Heard Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ram Chandra Shahani, learned Counsel for opposite parties no. 2 and 3 and learned A.P.P. for the State. It appears that it is an admitted position that the petitioner is the husband of opposite party no. 2 and father of opposite party no. 3. By the impugned order the learned Principal Judge, Family Court has directed the 2 petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.2400/- as ad interim maintenance to his wife and his daughter. The main case for maintenance is still pending before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court. Considering the facts and circumstances, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The petitioner is at liberty to raise his grievance before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court where the main case is pending. With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed. Kanchan (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)