-: 1 :- wp-3126/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3126 OF 2010 Neeta Vinay Masurkar. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Others. ..Respondents. Mr. A. V. Anturkar a/w Ramesh Ramamurthy for the petitioner. Mr. Y. R. Naik for respondent nos. 7 to 12, 14 to 16, 18 to 20. Mr. S. N. Bhosale, AGP for respondent no.1 to 4. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : July 21, 2010. P. C. : 1. Heard Mr. A. V. Anturkar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Y. R. Naik for the respondents and Mr. S. N. Bhosale, AGP for State. 2. At the instance of petitioner, an administrator under section 78 of the MCS Act was appointed on respondent no. 6 – society. Though the order appointing Administrator was confirmed by the appellate authority, the revisional authority set aside the order appointing the Administrator and therefore the present writ petition. 3. Admittedly, during the pendency of this writ petition, elections to the new managing committee of respondent no.6-society were held. The order under section 78 appointing the administrator, therefore, is rendered infructouos. The petitioner is always at liberty to file srp -: 2 :- wp-3126/10 proceedings under section 91 challenging the fresh elections before the Co-operative Court. With these observations, writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. 4. In view of the disposal of writ petition, civil application, if any, taken out in this writ petition does not survive and same also stands disposed of. (R.V. MORE, J.)