IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44915 of 2010 PARMESHWAR MANDAL, son of late Deo Narayan Mandal, r/v- Bavanganj, P.S.- Korha, District- Katihar….. Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. Considering the nature of allegation and the alleged role ascribed against the petitioner this Court would find that the petitioner was not even the Panchayat Secretary in the period in which the allegation of non- payment of honorarium to the Panchayat teachers has been made and further that the petitioner in fact was not named in the first information report and even in course of investigation the accusing finger has been raised by all the teachers against Mukhiya only, this Court would direct for release of the petitioner, namely, Parmeshwar Mandal on bail in the event he would surrender within a period of four weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C. J. M., Katihar in connection with Barari P. S. Case No. 94/10, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the 2 Cr.P.C. as also subject to the following conditions:- (i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioner will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and his absence even for a single day would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of his bail. (iii) The petitioner in case is now made accused in any other criminal case, that would itself lead to cancellation of his bail. Subject to the aforementioned conditions, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)