-: 1 :- wp-1744/08 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1744 OF 2008 Ms. Parul Jayantilal Kothari & Anr. ..Petitioners. Versus Kothari Apartment CHS ltd. & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. D.S. Jadhav for the petitioners. Mr. Vijay D. Patil for R-1. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : March 28, 2011. P. C. : 1. The petition arises from the proceedings under section 101 of the M.C.S. Act, 1960. The recovery certificate was granted by respondent no.3 in favour of respondent no.1 and against the petitioners’ father who is Developer. The petitioner’s revision under section 154 of the said Act was also dismissed by respondent no.4. This order is challenged in the present writ petition. 2. Mr. Jadhav, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the pendency of this writ petition, father of the petitioner has deposited with respondent no.1 the entire arrears/dues as per the Recovery Certificate issued u/s 101, which is the subject matter of revision before the Joint Registrar as well as before this srp -: 2 :- wp-1744/08 Court. Mr. Vijay Patil, learned counsel for respondent no.1 does not dispute this position. In these circumstances, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. The writ petition is therefore disposed of. 3. Since the petitioner has already cleared all the dues in respect of the recovery certificate in favour of respondent no.1, respondent no.2 is directed to decide issue regarding the raising of attachment on petitioner’s flat as expeditiously as possible and preferably within the period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. It is made clear that this order is restricted to the recoverable dues as per the certificate which was the subject matter of revision before the Joint Registrar and also before this Court. If there are any other dues subsequent to the aforesaid recovery certificate, respondent no.1 is at liberty to take necessary steps for the recovery of same. (RANJIT MORE, J.)