IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. CONTEMPT PETITIONN NO. 65 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1333 OF 2008 I.A. Saiyed .....Petitioner Vs. Municipal Commissioner of the Brihan Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai. .....Respondents. ..... None for the Petitioner. Ms. T.H.Puranik, for the Municipal Corporation with Mr.P.K. Hire, A.O. Estate, G/N Ward present. ...... CORAM: DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 2nd July, 2009 P.C. The learned counsel for the Municipal Corporation states that after the Order of the Division Bench dated 16th October, 2008, a notice to show cause was issued on 1st January, 2009. A hearing, it has been stated was held before the Assistant Commissioner, G-North Ward on 24th June, 2009 when the Petitioner was given an opportunity to produce certain documents. The learned Counsel for the Municipal Corporation states that a hearing has now been fixed tomorrow i.e. on Thursday, the 3rd July 2009 and an order shall be passed, in any event, on or before 30th July 2009. The learned Counsel for the Municipal : 2 : Corporation has submitted that though there was a delay in compliance, it was not intentional. Since the Municipal Corporation has acted on the directions of the Division Bench, though the some lapse of time, it would not be expedient to pursue the Contempt petition. The Contempt Petition stands disposed of. The Respondents shall abide by the statement. ****