THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.15709 OF 2010 DATED 13TH JULY, 2010 BETWEEN M/s.Neophyll Life Sciences, Represented by its Senior Marketing Manager, K.V.K.Kishore Reddy, S/o Sri K.Ram Reddy, Aged 36 years, resident of D.No.7-1-621/556/3RT 5-D; Sai Soudha, S.R.Nagar, Hyderabad-500 038. Regd. Office at Flat No.1, H.No.3-78, Street No.6 Habsiguda, B.R.R.Building, Habsiguda, Hyderabad. … Petitioner And The Commissioner & Director of Agriculture, Opp. L.B.Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, A.P. … Respondent WRIT PETITION NO.15839 OF 2010 DATED 13TH JULY, 2010 BETWEEN M/s.V.V.Labs, Represented by its Proprietor V.Venkat S/o V.Sudheer, aged 23 years, Resident of D.No.2-122, Last Bus Stop, Tadigadapa, Penamalur Mandal, Krishna District, Regd. Office at Plot No.39&4), Block No.B-4, Auto Nagar, Kanur, Vijayawada. … Petitioner And The Commissioner & Director of Agriculture, Opp. L.B.Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, A.P. … Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NOS.15709 AND 15839 OF 2010 COMMON ORDER: The petitioners in these two writ petitions assail the action of the Commissioner and Director of Agriculture, Hyderabad, the respondent, in interfering with the manufacture and sale of their bio-products under memo and letter dated 21.01.2006. They seek a consequential direction to the respondent not to interfere with such manufacture, sale and distribution of bio-products. It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the matter is squarely covered by the Judgment of this Court in M/S.SRI MANJUNATHA ORGANICS PVT. LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER & DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE[1]. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Agriculture fairly concedes that the matter is so covered. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions are disposed of in terms of the Judgment of this Court in M/S.SRI MANJUNATHA ORGANICS PVT. LTD., wherein reference was made to the earlier Judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No.11336 of 2009, with the following directions: (a) It shall be open to the petitioners to submit a sample of 5 Kg. of each product dealt with by them, together with the corresponding literature throwing light upon the manufacturing process as well as the contents thereof, to the respondent herein; (b) Within eight (8) weeks from the date of submission of the samples and the literature by the petitioners, the respondent shall get the same analysed in a suitable laboratory and intimate the result of the analysis to the petitioners; (c) In case, the analysis reveals that the products dealt with by the petitioners answer the description of the products mentioned in Schedule-III to the Control Order, the petitioners shall be entitled to deal with the products, only after obtaining licence under the Control Order. On the other hand, if the result is found otherwise, the petitioners shall not be subjected to the regime under the Control Order of the Act; and (d) If the respondent fails to intimate the result of the analysis within eight (8) weeks from the date of submission of the samples and the literature, it shall be open to the petitioners to deal with the products notwithstanding the impugned letter and the memo, as long as the products are not insecticides or chemicals. It is made clear that if any complaints are received from the ryots about the quality of the products manufactured by the industries in the name of ‘Bio-tech”, the respondent shall be entitled to take appropriate action, according to law, against the industries including the petitioners. No costs. ____________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J. 13TH JULY, 2010. VGSR/PGS [1] W.P.No.5039 of 2010 dated 15.03.2010