In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R. F. A No. 1876 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision : 29.1.2009 Smt. Kamlesh Devi ..... Appellant vs State of Haryana and another ... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate, for the appellant Mr. Navneet Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. The claimant has approached this court through the present appeals for further enhancement for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts are that vide notification No. LAC (F)- 95/NTLA/286, dated 9.5.1995, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act'), the State of Haryana acquired 88.74 acres of land for public purpose namely for development and utilisation thereof as institutional, residential and commercial for Sector-62, Faridabad. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, “the Collector”) assessed the market value of the land at Rs. 1,50,000/- per acre. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the landowners/claimants filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below vide award dated 12.2.2001, determined the market value of the acquired land at Rs. 290/- per square yard. Learned counsel for the parties submitted that the claim made by the appellant in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in R.F.A. No. 2501 of 2001 – Ved Pal and others vs State of Haryana and others, decided on 3.5.2006, whereby the compensation payable for acquisition of land for Sectors-62, 64, and 65, Faridabad, was assessed at Rs. 450/- per square yard. For the detailed reasons recorded in Ved Pal's case (supra), the present appeal is allowed in the same terms. 29.1.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge