IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-338 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.11.2011. Mehesh Jain and another ..Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. B.K. Bagri, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Satyavir Singh Yadav, D.A.G., Haryana, for respondent No.1 – State. Mr. Ravi Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Petitioners have sought quashing of First Information Report (for short 'FIR) No.121 dated March 7th, 2005, under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC'), registered in Police Station NIT Faridabad (Annexure P-1). By order dated February 15th, 2011, Daya Chaudhary, J. directed the trial Court to record the statements of the parties. In compliance with the same, Judicial Magistrate First Class, Faridabad recorded the statements of the parties, whereby, they stated that they have compromised the matter. Compromise-deed/Affidavit (Annexure P-2) has also been placed on record. Indeed, the dispute between the parties was of personal nature. In view of this, there should not be any impediment in allowing the parties to compromise the matter. Support to this view can be had from the authority 'Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab' 2008 (2) RCR (Criminal) 429, wherein, Hon'ble Supreme Court has ruled that in such type of cases, where the dispute is of personal nature, Court should ordinarily, accept the compromise. In view of the above, the petition is accepted, FIR No. No.121 dated March 7th, 2005, under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC, Police Station NIT Faridabad (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed. 02.11.2011 (NAWAB SINGH) neetu JUDGE