1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR APPR No. 197/2011 in Criminal Revision No. 151/2011 Sukhdeo s/o Kashinath Mendhule vs. The State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O., Hingna, Distt. Nagpur. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. CORAM : S.B.DESHMUKH,J DATE : 11.11.2011 Heard Mr. R.M.Daga, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. K.L.Dharmadhikari, learned APP for the respondent. 2. Mr. Daga, the learned counsel for the applicant points out the earlier order passed by this Court on 21st October, 2011. With the assistance of the learned counsel for the applicant, I have gone through the order dated 21st October, 2011 passed by this Court. By this order, the Criminal Revision Application has been admitted by this Court. This Court has recorded that there is arguable point regarding the age of the prosecutrix. Mr. Daga, the learned counsel states that 21st October, 2011 being a last working day before October vacation, further order could not be passed by this court in relation to the enlargement of the applicant on bail. The learned counsel points out from the copy of the application that the applicant was on bail during the 2` trial. After conviction by the trial court, the Criminal Appeal No. 15/2005 was filed before the Sessions Judge, Nagpur which was dismissed. During the pendency of the appeal, according to Mr. Daga, the applicant was released on bail. Therefore, during the pendency of the present Revision Application, the applicant seeks suspension of sentence and release him on bail. 3. It seems that the applicant was on bail during the trial as well as during the pendency of the Criminal Appeal No. 15/2005. This position has been admitted by the learned APP. Record and proceedings is also called for. In this view of the matter, I see no impediment in accepting the prayer of the applicant for bail. 4. In the result, this application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to the applicant is allowed. The applicant be released on bail on furnishing P.R.Bond in the sum of Rs. 5000/- with one surety in the like amount. Bail be furnished before the trial Court. 5. Liberty in favour of the parties to seek early hearing of the Criminal Revision Application. JUDGE patle 3`