. ^o 7./^ . ^.4,^"T-""^- -?^ ^ ^y^- IN THE COURT OFHON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l '•is'- • ' . WRIT PETITION N0 .'7..^.f.../2006 Sli i ,> •<i? ' •k^v^k&^ PETITIONER Sakram S/o Late Shri Nanhu Ram , Aged aboutSSyear working asGangman Department of P.W.D.R/o Dansara, Tah. Sarangarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) RESPONDENTS n/'l'n-i-1 J?,(Xa^a(^ l2'!2M CLERE to A. G. BILASi'US VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 3. Superintending Engineer, PublicWorks Department, BilaspurDivision, Distt.Bilaspur(C.G.) 4. Executive Engineer, PublicWorks Department, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC. ORANYOTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER m s XI-HC-22 "s^ '^w^i^ dTil'y'ita, fadwy an^r-giT h-iM sn^T ^i<^ ^I?TT !et< ?1 r ^^^^M^ 200 te^ar' 311^1'STBIWtrfN forith Shri SameerBehar, counsei Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. Application forurgenthearingi^ The Constitution •his seryices petitioner has of India on the have notbeeh filed thi^ . petitipn. under Artictes 226/227 of the ji'pund th^t even after complating 25 years ofservice, Gounsei for the petitjoner subrrjjts that the petitioner js serving as.Gangman since more than 25 years; Me has fil^d. petitioner is entitled to be reguiarize^ Annexure P-2 and Cireulars Annexilre dated 3-9-2002. it is pointed out that made cQliectiveiy and the same is have been reaularized. Learned State counsei pointed petitioner is pendjng and the same wi! Having considered and withoutj ease, in the opinion of this Court, for direction is given to the petitionerto his grtevahces before the respondent | of the petjtion an.d this order, representati'on bein.g filed, the comps the same on its own merits in accord; withln threefflQnthsfromthe date of made ciear that if any grievance avaiiable underthe law. With the aforesaid observationsl Certified copy as per rules. +l''<ffl<il-l ilWef!''B fetzt T[»i<rii< ^aiPgtTan^r epetitioner. 'fortheSi aiiowe< copy. of Sewice Bodk. He submits thatthe under ths Gangmen's Seivice Rules, 1996 P-3 dated 9-4-2003 and Annexure P-4 representations as per Annexure P-6 were in'g.'lt is also pointed out that some perSons (jsut that the representation submitted b>^ and decided. : expressing any opinion on the merits of the present, ends ofjustice wii! be serv'ed ifa rfiake a detaiied representation afresh raisin; |no,.2 - Engineer-in-Chief along with a copy |n three weeks from today.and o.n sach •^nt authority of the respondents shal! decide ince with iaw as early as possibte preferably t|ecelpV production ofthe representation. It is lins, the pefitioner may avaii the remedy, this stands disposed o.f. t Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [•m^^fig^ ^ .F-"