SBCWP NO.4254/09. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4254/2009. Prabhudayal Bairwa Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order:- May 11, 2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Tanveer Ahmed for the petitioner. Shri R.A. Katta and Shri S.N. Kumawat for the respondents. ****** BY THE COURT:- This writ petition has been filed with the prayer to follow the ordinance of the Rajasthan University of Health Sciences and instruction booklet and accordingly grant admission to the petitioner admission in M.Sc. (Nursing) Course for the academic session 2008- 09. 2) According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, respondents have in previous academic year granted admission to four candidates of Scheduled Castes category on the basis of 16% reservation but this year, only three candidates of SC category has been given admission. Learned counsel submitted that as per the roster point prepared by the respondents for the academic session 2008-09, one seat of General category was SBCWP NO.4254/09. 2 directed to be transferred to Scheduled Tribes category and one seat of Scheduled Tribes category was to be transferred to General category. 3) Shri R.A. Katta, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has drawn attention of the court towards the averment made in reply with regard to roster point maintained by the respondents for the academic year 2007- 08 and has contended that in the allocation of seats to in-service candidates, out of 10 seats, one seat was allotted to in-service SC category on Clinical side whereas no seat was allocated to the SC candidate on teaching side and therefore one seat each of ST category has been allotted to Clinical as well as Teaching sides in-service candidates and in order to maintain cyclic order this year, only one seat was allocated to in- service teaching candidate and not to in-service candidates of clinical side this year. Since petitioner is student of Nursing and not a member of Teaching Clinical side, he was not considered as a candidate from teaching side. Even otherwise, it was contended that cut- off marks for admission of candidates of SC Clinical was 154 whereas marks of the petitioner were 152 and therefore petitioner could not be allotted the seat. 4) Since all 25 seats have already been filled, I do not find any merit in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ) J. anil