IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. (SS) 1240 of 2011 Chotiya Singh and others …Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned counsel present for the petitioners. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned standing counsel present for the respondents. Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned standing counsel for the respondents. The petitioners are daily rated workers in the respondents’ department and pray for his regularization, in view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in State of Karnataka & others V. Uma devi (2006) 4 SCC 1, such a prayer cannot be granted. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction that if the petitioners move a representation before the authority concerned, the same shall be decided by the authority concerned as expeditiously as possible from the date a certified copy of the order is produced before him in view of the paragraph 53 of Uma Devi’s case, if there is any scheme for regularization the claim of petitioners for such a regularization shall also be considered. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) Dated: 15.09.2011 VKG