IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 26TH JULY 2011 / 4TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 4209 of 2011(A) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- GTL INFRASTRUTURE LTD., DOOR NO.40/9643, PRABHU TOWER, IST FLOOR, OPP. CHENNAI SILKS, M.G.ROAD, NORTH ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682035, REP. BY ITS SENIOR EXECUTIVE (LEGAL), MR.JINO ANTONY. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW SRI.SATHISH NINAN SRI.ARUN THOMAS SRI.JENNIS STEPHEN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUMPADAPPU POLICE STATION, PERUMPADAPPU P.O., PIN-679 580. 2. MR.MANSOOR, S/O.MANAF, ALUNGAL HOUSE, PALAPETTY P.O., PIN-679579. 3. PERUMPADAPPU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PERUMPADAPPU P.O., PIN-679580, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.VIPIN DAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.4209/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE PANCHAYATH DTD. 28.10.2010. P2:- COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 25.11.2010 AND A COPY OF THE DEMAND DRAFT DTD. 24.11.2010. P3:- COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.2750/RD2/09/LSGD DTD. 13.3.2009 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT. P4:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD. 4.7.2008 IN WP(C) 15605/2008. P5:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION AND RECEIPT 18.1.2011. P6:- COPY OF THE STOP MEMO DT.D 18.1.2011. P7:- COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER GRANTED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE TRIBUNAL DTD. 31.1.2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE tss PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ----------------------------------------------- WP(C). No. 4209 of 2011 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T Pius C.Kuriakose, J. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Appeal No. 77 of 2011 is pending before the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions against the stop memo which was subsequently issued by the Panchayat against the permit which had been issued by the Panchayat. In view of the pendency of the appeal, we are not inclined to examine the merits of the grounds raised in this writ petition. We close this writ petition, however, giving liberty to the petitioner to move again once the issue is decided in the appeal before the Tribunal. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) (C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE) ksv/-