^o' /^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTLSGARH AT BIIASTUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETmON rC^ No. 5230 of2008 . . : Smt. Kusumbai Jain W/Q Shri Laxmichand Jain, aged about 58 yeare, resident ofC/o Shri Ashdk Kuniar PafaBl, Patni Jute IndBstries Bhoipara. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS : Shri Laxmichand Jam S/o Shri Kastiw Chand Jam, aged 60 years, resideait of SAdar Bazaar, Jamwali Gali, Distfiet Durg • . . .-., .- . . . „.. - , s WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hoa*Ne Shri Sattsh K. AffiuBiotel, J. . Present: ShriKX.Paiidey, A^ocatefw(hep@titi^er.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^ f ©RALORDER (Passedon22nd <!ayof Septsmher, 2008) , 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitionw submits that fhe Hi^i €ourtof Madhya Pradesh, by order dated 29.7.1993 passed in Fif^ Appsal No. 76/1992 (Smt. Kusumbai Jain v. Shri Laxmichand Ja®),upheld th@ deeree ©f divorce passed by the Court below and directed the resp^ndeat te pay a sum ofRs. SOOAper monthfor maintenance imderprovisions ofsection25 c€the Hindu Mamage Act, 1955 (forshort 'tfae Act, 1955). 2. The petitioner may very well approaeh competetit coiirt having the jurisdictionunderfhe provisions ofsecti(m25 rffheAct, 1955 for¥itryu%or modification ofthe order ofpermanentalmiony. •....•:^. s 3. In view of the foregoin^ the petitions*an(te dispesed of Howev^, (he petitioner is at liberty to take re<x)urse to the original cosiyetent court havittg jurisdiction under the provisions offhe Act, 1955 for api»-opriaterelief.No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ainit