( 1 ) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 4831 OF 2010 (M/s. Hemant Transport Co., through its proprietor, Nandlal Ratanlal Kotecha, and 10 others Vs. The Union of India, through its Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi, and 4 others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................. Mr. Vinod P. Patil, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. P.G. Godhamgaonkar, Standing Counsel, for respondent nos.1 to 5. .............................................................................. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 29TH NOVEMBER 2010 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks liberty to withdraw the petition so as to take recourse to alternate remedy available in law, in so far as demurrages are concerned. 2. Liberty granted, as prayed for, in so far as the said aspect is concerned. ( 2 ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders 3. In so far as grant of facilities to the labourers are concerned, the petitioners shall be at liberty to make appropriate representation to the respondents, which will be considered by them within a period of two months from the date of making representation. 4. With these observations, the petition is disposed of, as withdrawn. ( R.M. BORDE ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE bgp/4831wp