IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1171 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1171 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1171 OF 2006 Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak ... Petitioner Aghadi V/s. The Security Guards Board for ... Respondents Greater Bombay & Thane Dist. & Ors. Ms. Ranjana Todankar for the petitioner. Ms. Lata Desai with Ms. Pallavi Divekar for respondent No.1. Mr. R.S. Pai & Ms. S. Joshi i/b. Haresh Mehta & Co. for respondent No. 2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 4th December, 2006 : 4th December, 2006 : 4th December, 2006 P.C. . Heard counsel for the parties. If guards whose names are listed at Exhibit A to the annexure have already applied to respondent No. 1 for registration, respondent No.1 to consider the same and dispose of the application according to law within eight weeks from today. 2. It is case of the petitioners that respondent No.2 has violated the provisions of the Act. If that be the case, respondent No.1 to take steps in law, to which they are entitled to. ( 2 ) 3. With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]