INTHE'HIGHCOURTOFJUDICATUREATCHHATnSGARH : BILASPUR WRFT PETmON N0. 34~?3 /2006 PETITIONERS / M^. ^<^' 7-i"';y .•••''/ /!^!%y ..-"c^'s^' ..•••\-<\ ^'^ js~' .^''A<y'y <c-_y_ RESPONDENTS Versus 1. Paklu Ram Verma S/o I. Verma Agedabout 75 years, Occupation Agriculturist Bisauha Ram Verma, s/o R. Kurmi, Aged about 55 years, Occupation Agriculturist Both are R/o Village Chhachhan Pahari, Tahsil Tilda, District Raipur (C.G.) 1) State of Chhattisgarh / Through : The Secretary Revenue, D.K.S Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) / 2) The Collector, Raipur (C.G.) /3) The Tahsildar, Tahsil Tilda, District Raipur (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA + sn^iqii K.'U'h Sf^S ?h^l<t) ^n^tT 's^ '*\w\v\^, ^Tily'i'i. f^ HWWI 9>HI«h STR^T inra? ...^..•|):....^..A.t(.3^/^ f^^ST' sn^i ^Riiwafttt SB: Hon'bte Shri Manindra MohanlShrivastava.J 04-03-2011 1 Shri S.C. Verma, counsel forth4 Shri ^ay Dwivedi, State/respondents. Even though notices were 18/7/06 and notices were also issuetl served on respondents, no retum has two weeks was granted to file reply. for further time. Consklering the aforesaid granted and on 17/4/07, last opportunjty any Turther time. This petttion has been flted by year 1988-89, in order to construct a| Pahri, Tahsii-Tilda, District-Raipur, th+ petitionera for construction of dam. lt| the petitioner No.1 admeasuring 4.1 admeasuring 5.75 acres were acq^iin acquisition, no compensaBon has records maintained by the revenue Annexure P/2. It is further case of tht villagere, whose land were acqi^i representation but those representsf compensation has not been paid. Be that as K may, if the been acquired / utilised for ponstructi|on .76 •tiifi'i'fl-i i^i^'^ f®IA<Rii+ii< i; sipin an^i petitioners. Govemment Advocate for the Depu^y wc^pted by the State counsel way back on by registwed post and reported to be |»eenfiled. On 17/4/07, last opportunity <rf 1'oday, learned counsel for the State prays circijmstances that several opportunlties were was granted, 1 am not incljned to grant |he petitioner on the pleadlngs that in the |Minl Dam in village-Changori/Chhachhan state authorities utilised tl'ie land of the is the case of the petitionere that land of acres and land of the petitioner No.2 acq^iired in the year 1988-89 but towards awvarded. In support of their t'rtte, the a(rthorKies have been placed on record as ^ petltioners that the petitionere and other, ired for construction of dam, made (tioi were not paid any heed to and land/ag(1cuNural land owned by the petHionera has of dam, the petitioners are entitted for -L- 1 •;"ii •;rfBi'1 t.-si3^ '•vT'sS3& S XI-HC-22 311^1^1 Ri-li+ 311^1 *qi^ "^^ DwpG ^ ^"er ^iiiid'4, dTfl'y'iii. r'Kii'yy SV^V TRTg? ..^..^.;....VJt:.^^Q 1 Ist' "WI. '200 <41*f?fT shKI<») fe^sr' 3n^T'?snm^f?(t _3- corrte expedi^nt Resp|3ndent payment of appropriate compensatk contained in the Land Acquisition Ad. The respondents have not view of the matter, 1 deem it Raipur to correider the grievance of th< their re|M'esentation along with deta'l^ documents regarding their ownerehip o( purposes of construction of dam. if it is found that the land of the petK| construction of dam, it shall direct appropriate proceedings for paymenjt petitioner strictly in accorda.nce with th^ proceedings for acquisition have been land ofthe petitioner. Considering the submissions acquired way back in the year 1988-8^, exercise on ite part within a period offo|ur of this OTder. In case, any eventuatit^ Acquisition Officer, the Collector shall | Land Acquisition Officer within the afcjr AcquiSition Officer shall in turn, take a| assessment of compensation in the four months of such receipt. In case,| redressed, it shall always be open for tl^e WKh the aforesaid observationsl ':t'l'lli<lt^-f ^WvS 4 fest <fa]t$K ^T Slfigil 311^1 n in accordance with the provisions forward with any repty so far. In this to direct respondent No.2/Collectw, petitionere. The petttionere shall submlt of their title documents and revenue the land whteh have been ufilised fortte No.2 shall consider the same and |oner has been taken Tor the purpose of the Land Acquiation Offtoer to draw of appropriate compensation to the provisions of Land Acquisitlon Act, 'vS no ^ken and award passed In respect of tto df the petitioner that the land has been j, the Cotlector, Raipur shail complete the months from the date of receipt of copy ); arises to refer the matter to the Land |foiward the case 6f the petitioner to the resaid period of four moirths. The Land )propriate steps to pass ordera regarding prescribed under the law, within nact |the grievance of the petitioner is stitl not petitioner to approach the Court. the petition is finally disposed off. malnner Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge 'nA '^'fjcT;