APPLICANTS: (in Jail R waram, son of Rohidas Haiba, aged about 32 'ear R mcharan. son of Rohidas, aged about $5 3. Vi eshi Ram. son of Kallu Ram Halba (w ong!y mentianed Maim), aged about 55 Al are resident of viHage Gabdi, P.S. Ar undo, Tahsi'. Sundefdehi, Distt. Durg (CG -Versus- NON-APPLICANT: St te of Chhattisgarh. Through the Police St tier: Arjunda, Distt. Borg (CG). (Application und r Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.) 3-10-2007 Heard Shri C.J.K. Rao. co nsei for the anpiioants & Shri Ashish Shukia, Addi. Pubiic Prosecutor for the Sta e. This aoolication has bee moved for correction of fathers’ names of applicant No.2 Ramcharan & appii ant No.3 Videshi Ram. It has’been mentioned that correct names of fathers of ppiicant No.2 & 3 are Rohidas Haiba & Kaiiu Ram Haiba. respectively wherea in the memo of M.Cr.C. No.1619f2007 itsetf names of fathers of aoplicants No 2 & 3 are mentioned as Rohidas & Maliu Ram Haiba, respectively and in th Court order dated 17-9-2007 passed in No.1619/2007 the name o father of both applicants No. 2 & 3 are typed \ \ M.Cr.C. 3 \ \out as Mallu Ram Halba. s. \ W m gi 200 mm (W) WW Wm aawm WWW mwm 'der data! 9-7-29G7 passed by iearned 1D“ ack Couit), Durg, shows that the name of father {ohidas Halba whereas the name of father of Ram Halba. In View of the ahove, the fatheis’ names of applicants No.2 Ramcharan & read as Rohidas Halba & KaHu Ram Halba, Perusai 0f the re}eeticn o Additiona! Sessions Judge (Fast Tr: of appiicam No.2 Ramcharan is F applicant No.3 Videshi Ram is Kant No.3 Videshi Ram be conected & respectively. of the order dated 17-9—2007 passed in The remaining contents M.Cr.c.No.16i9/2oo7 (supra) shan < Wilh the: aforesaid observ ations & directions this application (CLMP. No.449/2007) stands disposed of. remain unaltered. Sdl— L.C.BHADOO a < r W Judge f.’[3