T59 •<)rtil?S'i|, »'(fly']<o,RjCtiy^ *<l*<dl *t<l<B """'""""""""""•"•-••••••••"•••••"—-^ 200 sn^r iraw C'pfg^w) SII^CT.^I lc!-ll°b WII dll'tfl Stlli* wiTW^itersii^r SB : HON'BLE SHRI JUST WRIT PETITION ( PETITIONERS DBFENDANTNO.l VBRS RESPONDENT PLAINTIFF RESPONDENT DEFENDANT N0.2 7.4. Shri B.D. Guru, coun( The petitioner bv thisl Constitution of India h^ 13.2.2008 (Annexure P/l) Judge, Raigarh has rejectej under Ord.er 26 Rule 1 ofl brevity the Code'j for issua): of her two witnesses nam.i^ Singhal, who reside beyon(|l <iii<iI<i<II-i ^nvS if fe^t <Fi|<<;l< Rw ^i^^i ;E DHIRENDRA MISHRA 271 N0^ 2053 OF 2008 Sm.t. Krishna Devi, W/o Suresh Kumar Agrawal (Bansal), aged about 50 years, R/o Vikas Na-gar Gali Kotra Road, Raigarh (COj s Sanjay Kum.ar Soni, S/o Leela Ram. Soni, aged about 31 years, JK/'O lra7an Bazar, Raigarh (CG) 1 State of Chl-tattisgarli, ) 1 fhrough CoUector, Raigarh, Distrirt Raigarh (CG) iel for the petitioner. petition under Article 227 of fhe s impugned the order dated •vhereby the I Additional District the application of fhe petitioner ftie Code of Civil Procedure (for .ce of commission for exaaiuiation [y Shri Saket Gupta & Sagamaal the local liinits of its jurisdiction IB^ <rtw ^TOHI?ICTIWJEF —FS/59— 80007 —30,000. '3^ '^{•'tWf, »T(1<rl'i<o, Ri0i'yy 141*<rtl sb^lcb -••-•—••-•----------•--• ^ 200 sf^st VRIV ('yS^^i) SD^CT.^l ft'IB? wian^T aCTir ?BiiWHtosti^r °ni«ifii«Iliiiiri>'<fft^<R|^l< ii'STfOTSIT^r as adm.ittedlv thev are respectively i.e. at a dista Raigarh. Leanied counsel fo application of the petitionc below with an observation ione to Sivani in conu established by producin^ examintnR her husband wl matter and exaraination of| 1s not necessan' in a proce) decree dated 30th June 2001 Reliance is placed on Amarchand Parakh Vs. t'esidents of Kolkata & Sivani, (ice of 600 km & 1500 km from the petitioner subniits that |r has been rejected by the Court |iat fhe fact fhat the petitioner had tection with uiarciage, can be livitation card of the marriage and lose affidavit has been filed ui the ISaket Gupta and Sagarmal Smgal ;dmg for setting aside the ex-party passed in CivU Suit No. 10-A/06. tfae order passed m the matter of Prasad Aera'wal reported in Uaxtni 1996 MPLJ 711. I have heard leamed In the matter of appllcation for issuance of of the Code was rejected bj the defendant has not s] witness cannot come to t| ;ounsel for the petitioner. Amccrchand Parakh (supra) the :ommission mider Order 26 Rule 4 the trial Coiirt on fhe ground that lown sufilicieiit cause as to why ie Court. The High Court of MP ?BB^F ^t? ^off^iF, y'aWJ^lM —FS/59— 8/2007—30,000. ^%^'^-. '^, S£«-°, 3 sii^n.w k-w^ OTI3IK5T sk*ll<* ^ ^ssi 'nfp^vs, OTfly'ie, Rirtiyy t^lt^cll **11«b v^ an^r viy; (^f^sRtr) refemns to proviso to Rule that it is not fhe requiremei shown as to whv witne; requtrem.ent is that where; person cannot be ordered com.m.ission shall be issi evidence is considered necei Leamed fa.T.al Court cj Order 26 Rule 4 of the Co| application of the petition| petitioner by examining I| affidavit was filed alons fact that she had gone to with some marriage and| Sagarmal Stnghal is not n^ There is no illegality, com.m.itted by the Court be| justice or mandfest inju^ interfereuce under Article Accordmgly, the petition b| to be dismissed tn lunine Wltltl cni<<I<rt-4l'T^H<rt?Tf[sl<il <ffl+$i< ^ aifipr sii^r adid |4(lj of Order 26 of the Code held fct of laKi/that the cause should be 1s camiot come to Court. The under Rule 19 of Order XVt a |to attend the Court in person, a lied for hls examination tf his ,sary ui the interest ofjustiGe. |onsidertng the application under P.e and its reply, has rejected the ;r with an observation tfaat the ^erself and her husband, whose the petitioner, can establish fhe Bivani and Kolkata tn connection evidence of Saket Gupta and ;cessarv in the interest of iustice. iiflrmity or jurisdictlonal error low, which inay occasion failure of tice to the parties, warrantin^ 227 of fhe Constitution of India. ;ing devoid of substance deserves is hereby dismissed^ •a^a SSv ijii"iicK]-(M.ii<i|M :—FS/59— 8/2007 —30,ooo; \ . ^^a -\ ^^s