WP(C) 4663/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K.SHARMA Admittedly, the petitioner paid only a part of the first kist money. Further by Annexure 8 letter dated 01.10.09 addressed to the Deputy Commissioner, Goalpara District, the petitioner also made it known that he was unable to pay the 2nd and 3rd kist money. Situated thus, the Executive Officer, Matia Anchalik Panchayat h as passed the Annexure 9 order dated 21.102009 cancelling the settlement of the Budurchar Chekcheki beel with effect from 21.10.2009. Various reasons have been assigned for failure to deposit the kist money. Mr. M. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that th e petitioner will furnish a fresh representation stating his grievance. Such re presentation would be made to the Executive Officer, Matia Anchalik Panchayat, w ho has passed the impugned order dated 21.10.2009. Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, this wr it petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh rep resentation before the said authority. It is made clear that there is no interference with the impugned order dated 21.10.09 (Annexure 9 to the writ petition). In the event of making fresh representation, the said authority may dispose of the same in accordance w ith law. As indicated above, no opinion is expressed on merit.