5:9 w ‘ (:35? 1N THV IGH COURTOF J. DICATURE T BILA PUNC‘G MISCELLANEox/s APPEAL No. @Eykim ganch APPELLANT C‘lz’AIMANT (A1) Jamna Agad Mansingh abou£— B iWidow 5/0 5'5 Sri yeam a? Bhagchané 5n Bhagchand Agéd abouf— 9 years, f3) Dinéayal S/o SH’ Bhagchand Aged abau’e 7 Years I. (,4) Rupcsh Aged abou‘c S/o Sri — 3 Bbagchand years. ‘ ‘ . ' 9&1, oj}. (5.) Age<i Kamk about Kam S/o «~60 sn‘ years mcidu Ram, ‘ = \gaEE-Wy . \%\I%;§F" v ..~‘ Applica legai R/o #Nayak guardian nt No.2,5’,& Bamih, mcfberJamna 4 Posf are ~ represen’ced Abhanpur, bai, All are hereby Tabsikv Abbanpur, Disi’e Raipur‘ VERSU //(1) V,Appa Rao, Through: Rae S/o Sri Caicutfa V.Ap&nna Anéhra Road, Lions, Raipur Road, Parsada ‘3 Bi‘aspur, Tabsi‘ & Dis’d — . BilaspuKCG.) f“ (2) S.Trimur£hi S/o Grisiya, Lal Through SafyaNarayan :Caicu’ttaw Anéhra Road, Lions #Raipur RoadParsaAa Bilaspur (5) Na£ional insurance Company Lfzi, f' Tbraugh: Divisiona) Manager, GERoaCX, Raiyur (4) Ne’c Ram 5/0 Sri Dou la) Agre, ’ R/o Nayak - bancHaa Posf ~ & y (5,) Thana M/s. Coufam — Abhanpurr Hardware Distb Propriefor, Raipur. ‘; g -‘ / Awina’ch, R/o Abhanyur, S/o Sri Dis’c’c~ Ratan Raipur lad Duggad, ,l' (6) The On‘en’ca‘ Xnsurance Comyany LidaTlnrough: Divisional Manager. Jail Road, Raipur (CG) * RE§PONDENT JrQON’APPLICANT W Miscell . neous A e lu er sectron . \ 173 Mo’cor Vehicle r ACH988 e “ f / XI-Hc-22 mm m...m.&l.caam m > m mmqga WW§NW agmam‘m DIVI3‘ON BENCH: HQN’BLE SHR! A.K. PATNAIK, CJ & HQN’BLE SHRI FAKHRUDDIN‘, u_. 16I03l2005: - Heard Mr} S.C. Verma Ieamed counsel for thé appellant and Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Qamrul Aziz learned counsei for respondént NOS/National Insurance Cbmpany Limited. This is ai'i appeal filed by the claimants/appellants against the judgment and award' dated 01i08/2003 passed by the Sixth Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunai-cum-District Judge, Raipur in Claim Case No.1 15 of 2002. During the pendency of the appeal, the parties have agreed on ‘ 18(08l2004 to oompromise the ter and as per- the said compromise ' I respondent No.3/National lnsuran e Company Limited is to pay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/— (Rupees‘one lak only) in addition to the amount of Rs.1,50,000/— (Rupees one lakh xty thousand only) to the claimants I appellants, Any application'(l.A.N .598 of 2005) under Order 23 Rule 3 has alsobeen filed by olaimant/ ppellant No.1 stating therein that the aforesaid compromise has been d ne in the interest of ail the claimants] appellants-including the minor aimants/appellants No.2 to 4. The application is also supported by a affidavit. Mr. SC. Verma, learned ounsel appearing for the claimants / . ' appellants and Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr, Advocate appearing forrespondent No.3/National insurance Compan Limited admit the said compromise. mate) t ‘ i l X iiLRC-fiié Miscellaneous appeal 1 2 of 2004 acwrdingly stands disposed of in terms of the aforesaid c9 promise. Let a sum of R$.1,00,000I’ (RupeeS one lakh only) be pa by respondent No.3/National Insurance Company Limited to the clai ants / appellants within one month from ' today. The impugned judg ent and award of the Tribunal stands modified accordingly. ‘ Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge (niaéi‘em