1 38 wp.2572.10 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2572 OF 2010 Ram Tajbahadur Singh. ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ... Respondents ----- Mr. A.V.Gangal with Mr. Ashok Gade and Mr. V.Pandey for the Petitioner. Mr. J.P.Yagnik, APP for the Respondent/ State. Ms. Sarita Donde for Respondent No.4. ----- CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and U.D. SALVI, JJ. DATE : 13 th September, 2010. P.C. 1 This petition has been filed essentially for two reliefs. The first relief is that the Respondents be directed not to give effect to the alleged prohibitory order dated 10 th February, 2010 at Exhibit ‘E’ to the petition issued by the Investigating Officer. The second relief is that Respondent No.2 be directed to appoint some other officer instead of Respondent No.3 in respect of the case registered against the Petitioner. 2 Both these reliefs, in our opinion, have been worked out, considering the fact that the investigation is complete and the charge- 2 38 wp.2572.10 sheet has already been filed on 12 th July, 2010. This is so because, insofar as the first relief is concerned, that is pertaining to the alleged order dated 10 th February, 2010 issued by the Investigating Officer. It records that since investigation of the criminal case is in progress, not to issue NOC in respect of the Petitioner’s property being Shop No. 32. Now that the investigation is over, the said directive, will have no effect until Court of competent jurisdiction were to issue such direction or injunction against the Petitioner or any other party. In the circumstances, petition is disposed of accordingly. [ U.D. SALVI, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]