HIGH COURT WCMHATTISGARH. BILASPUR PETITLONEBS RESPONDENTS W.P. (S) No. 6873 of 2007 1. S.B.Bohra, S/o Shri K.B.Bohra, fiiQe about52 years, U.D.T^Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Bhanupratappur, DislrictKanker(C.G.) 2. Takeshwar Prasad Sahu , S/o Shri Tula Ram Sahu, Age about 47 years, U.D.T., Govt. N.D. Hr. Sec. School, Kantor, District Kanker (C.G.) 3. Swarup Ram Sonnewara, S/o late Shri R.S. Sonnewara, Age about 57 yeare, U.D.T., Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Sidesar, Dlsfrtct Kanker(C.G.) 4. Surendra Kumar Yadav, S/o Shri SonuRam Yadav, Age about 50 years, U.D.T., Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Lil^har, District Kanker (C.G.) Versus 1 State Govemment of Chhatlisgarh, Through:- Secretary, Tribal & Education Departnent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 TribalWelfareDeparhnent, District Kanker (C.G.) 3 Treasury, Account & Pension, District Kanker (C.G.) WRTT PEriTION UNDER ARTICLE2260FTHE CONSTn'UTION OPINDIA ADpearance; Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the State on advanw copy. OFUU.ORDER (20.11.2007) .. SXJHIL KUMAR, 8INHA, J. Heard. Leamed counset for We petitioners subraits ttia* the tesue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioners are entitlKl to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initialappointment or frorathe date of completion of probation period. He submits that ttie issue inwahred herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State AdtntnistraBva Tribunal, Jabalpur in OA.No.2745/89 (MadhukantYaduand 56 others f4 V. W.P.<S).No.6873of2007 Shyna Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein, it was held Uiat th®similarty situated teaehers are enlitled to regular payscale w.e.f. the date <rf initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'bleSuprMne Court In Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 68S2fS3. The said peGfien was dismissed by the Hon'bte Supreme Court upholdlng Uiedecislon of ttie Tribunal to the effect that the Teachefaf Assistant Teachers are entitled to regutar pay scale from the date of initial appointment. Leamed counsel for the petitioners further submte that this Court, white considering the same issue in RamKumar Sahu & others Vs. State Govt. of Chhatt'sgarh &another (W.P.(S) No. 813 of 2007) by order dated 12.2.2007, has granted regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that thts ease |s squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Ram Kumar Sahu and another (Supra). In view ofthat, this petition is allowed in thesame terms. However, this ordershgll l)e subject to alt verificattons made by the State r^arding facts pleaded in the petition. :Sd'-^:,,.