IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA G. APP. (DB) No.16 of 2008 THE STATE OF BIHAR Versus SULO YADAV ----------- 3 08.07.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the appellant, State of Bihar and perused the impugned Judgment of acquittal passed under Section-232 Cr.P.C. From the discussions made in the order under appeal, we find that the learned trial court has rightly held that there was no legal evidence to proceed further against the Respondent and, therefore, he passed the order of acquittal under Section-232 Cr.P.C. Even the earlier order passed on 7.11.2007 shows that the A.P.P. had agreed with the submission of the defence that since the oral evidence was not at all satisfactory and sufficient. hence, no useful purpose would be served by examining the doctor and the Investigating Officer. In the facts of the case, we find no merit in this appeal. The prayer for grant to leave the appeal is, therefore, rejected. ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J) ( Abhijit Sinha, J) NKS/-