1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3413/2009 [SHRIKANT WAMANRAO DHARMADHIKARI VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA] ............................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................................................. CORAM : P.D. KODE, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 24, 2009. Heard Mr.Parag Ukey, learned counsel for the applicant, and Mrs. K.H.Joshi, learned APP, for respondent State. Learned APP upon the instructions from the Investigation Officer Shri Rajan Sahare, H.C. B.No. 2045, P.S.Sakkardara, who is present, has stated that as directed by this Court the applicant has attended the Investigating Officer and cooperated with the investigation. She further states that in view of the information received, the Investigating Officer is required to effect the 2 further investigation regarding involvement of the wife of the complainant and the same would take some time and during or after the same, the presence of the applicant may be required. She further states that immediately the presence of the applicant is not required for the purpose of investigation. Having regard to the aforesaid and having regard to the matters stated in the application and conduct of the applicant, the applicant has made out a case for extending the benefit under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure. The Investigating Officer of Crime No. 218 of 2009 is hereby directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant in connection with the said crime, he shall be released on anticipatory bail uptill submission of charge sheet in the said crime subject to his furnishing a P.R.Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with two sureties in the like amount and subject to the conditions that applicant shall; (i)make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required uptill the said period; 3 (ii) not directly or indirectly making any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of crime under the investigation for dissuading the said person from disclosing the facts within his knowledge to the investigating Officer (iii)not leaving the residential address mentioned in the application without the permission of this Court; (iv)not commiting any offence while being on bail granted by this order. Application stands disposed of. In view of the above order, Criminal Application Nos. 308/09, 309/09 and 341/2009 stands disposed of. JUDGE Rvjalit