IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD JULY 2008 / 1ST SRAVANA 1930 R.P.F.C.No. 254 of 2006 --------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 1.9.06 OF THE FAMILY COURT JUDGE, MALAPPURAM IN MC.186/2004 of 2004 .................... REVN. PETITIONER/RESPONDENT --------------------------------------------- SIVADASAN, S/O. ARAMUGHAN, AGED 47 YRS, ANTHOOR HOUSE, P.O.PATHIRIYAL, THIRUVALI AMSOM, DESOM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS: ------------------------------------------- 1. MEKHA, D/O. SINDHU, (REPRESENTED BY THE GUARDIAN MOTHER SINDHU), ANTHOOR HOUSE, P.O.PATHIRIYAL, THIRUVALI AMSOM, DESOM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. SINDHU, D/O. THAMI, AGED 41 YEARS, ANTHOOR HOUSE, P.O.PATHIRIYAL, THIRUVALI AMSOM, DESOM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.K.AJITH KUMAR FOR R1 & 2 THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT, J ---------------------- R.P.F.C.No.254 of 2006 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of July 2008 O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has been settled in terms of Annexure A1 agreement. This fact is confirmed by the learned counsel for the respondent also. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays and the learned counsel for the respondent endorses that request that it may be recorded that the matter has been settled in terms of Annexure A1 agreement and in these circumstances it is not necessary to challenge the impugned order. 2. Request accepted. It is recorded that the dispute between the parties has been settled as per Annexure A1 order. 3. This R.P.F.C is in these circumstances dismissed. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) jsr R.P.F.C.No. 2 R.P.F.C.No. 3 R.BASANT, J R.P.F.C.No. ORDER 11/02/2008