IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.25188 OF 2009 KANHAI URAON, SON OF LATE MAHAVEER URAON, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MANDIHA, POLICE STATION GAUNAHA, DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 30.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under sections 147, 148, 149, 324, 353 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. Petitioner is said to have been named by the accused arrested while fleeing away. No overt act has been alleged against petitioner and petitioner is in custody since 25.11.2006. A supplementary affidavit has been filed in which it has been stated that two more cases were against petitioner out of which in one case he has been acquitted and in the second case, he is on bail and in that case he has been falsely implicated only on the basis of suspicion. Considering the period of incarceration of petitioner and nature of the offence in the present case, the application is allowed. Let petitioner (Kanhai Uraon) be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount - 2 - each to the satisfaction of Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Bettiah, West Champaran in Sessions Trial No.99/2009 arising out of Gaunaha P.S. Case No.136/2004 with conditions as laid down in sub-section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)