IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22646 of 2011 Nitesh Singh @ Nitesh Kumar Singh, son of Bharat Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 20.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363, 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added. The petitioner is named in the First Information Report as one of the persons who had taken away the deceased. Subsequently, it transpired that the deceased had been murdered for ulterior reason. One of the accused confessed that the petitioner actively participated in the murder and on the statement of the co- accused Manoj Singh, incriminating article as also skeleton were recovered. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The Magistrate concerned is directed to immediately commit the case to the court of Sessions so that the trial can proceed. For this reason he may also take recourse to summoning the co-accused adequately if they are not appearing. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)