1512appln1854.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1854 of 2010. (Shrikant Arun Mankar ..vs.. The State of Mah..) ............................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ............................................................................................................................................................... Mr.G.G.Mishra, Adv. for the applicant. Mrs.A.R.Taywade, APP for the respondent. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATED : 15 th December, 2010. Heard Mr.Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Mrs.Taywade, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. By the present application, the applicant is seeking enlargement on bail in Crime No.37 of 2010, registered at Police station, Borkhedi, Tq.Motala, Distt.Buldana. Mr.Mishra submits that the applicant, who is brother in-law of victim Alka, is falsely involved in the crime and the allegations against the applicant are totally baseless. Learned counsel further submits that there is nothing on record to suggest about the allegations such as; the applicant has demanded money or ill-treated the victim. Learned counsel submits that the investigation is complete and the applicant is ready to abide by any condition imposed upon by this court. The reply is filed by the State. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has strongly opposed the application. The learned A.P.P. has made available the material collected by 1512appln1854.odt 2 the Investigating Agency. Perused the material and the record. Perusal of the record shows that the statements are immediately recorded and in the statements, more particularly in the statement of brother and sister of the victim, it is stated that the victim had disclosed them that the applicant was making sexual advances at the victim. It was stated that the victim was fed-up with the allegations levelled by the applicant against the victim that she had indulged in illicit relations. It is also revealed from the statement that the victim has disclosed that the applicant was pressurizing the victim for her company. In view of the serious allegations levelled against the applicant which find in the statement of the near relatives, father, sister and brother, I am of the opinion that this is not the fit case to enlarge the applicant on bail. In the result, the application is rejected. JUDGE chute