IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.3652 of 2008 Date of decision:11.10.2010 Union of India ...Appellant Versus M/s Narinder Singh & Sons and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Dhiraj Chawla, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Advocate, for Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This appeal is directed against the order of the learned District Judge, Gurdaspur dated 07.05.2008 by which objection filed by the appellant under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [for short “the Act”] challenging the arbitral award dated 28.06.2004, has been dismissed. The facts of this case are not required to be recapitulated as they are given in detail in the impugned order. Suffice it to say that learned counsel for the appellant has not made any meaningful submission to challenge the findings recorded by the learned District Judge while dismissing their objection filed against the arbitral award. In view thereof, I do not find any merit in the present appeal and as such, the same is hereby dismissed. No costs. October 11, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod JUDGE