IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3501 of 2011() ------------------------ MC.36/2011 & MC 83/10 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, KUNNAMKULAM ...... PETITIONER / 2ND RESPONDENT : ------------------------------------------------- ACHUTTY UMMA, AGED 75 YEARS, W/O. MOIDU, NEERATTY PARAMBIL HOUSE, EDAKKARA DESOM, PUNNAYUR VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.ANIL RESPONDENTS / PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS 1 AND 3 TO 6 : --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SUBAIDA, W/O. ABDUL LATHEEF, AGED 36 YEARS, NEERATTIPARAMBIL HOUSE, EDAKKARA DESOM, PUNNAYUR VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK - 680 506. 2. ABDUL LATHEEF, AGED 46 YEARS, RESIDING -DO- 3. AMINAKUTTY, AGED 48 YEARS, W/O. MOIDUTTY, MANGATTAYIL HOUSE, VANNER DESOM, PONNANI TALUK-679 577. 4. ARIFA, W/O. HAKKIM, AGED 38 YEARS, MALLIAKKARA HOUSE, EDAKKARA DESOM, PUNNAYUR VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK-680 506. 5. MOIDUTTY HAJI, S/O. KUNHUMUHAMMED, MANGATTAYIL HOUSE, PERUMPADAPPU VILLAGE, PONNANI TALUK -679 577. 6. ABOOBACKER, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. KUNHUMUHAMMED, THARAYIL HOUSE, VADAKKEKKAD VILLAE, KALLINGAL DESOM, PONNANI TALUK-679 577. 7. STATE, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031. R1 BY ADV. SRI. P. RAMACHANRAN R7 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. RAJESH VIJAYAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- Crl.MC.No. 3501 of 2011() APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURE'S ANNEXURE-1- TRUE COPY OF THE M.C 36/2011 BEFORE THE JUDICIAL 1ST CLASS MAGISTRATE, KUNNAMKULAM RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE'S - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.3501 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of November 2011 O R D E R Sri.P.Ramachandran, the learned counsel submits that he proposes to appear for R1. The learned counsel further submits that evidence has already been started and that even without any direction, the evidence can be completed during this month itself. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aged 75 years and so case has to be disposed of at the earliest. The learned counsel for R1 also submits that R1, the wife is more eager to see that the case is disposed of at the earliest. In the light of what is stated above, the court below is directed to dispose of the matter at the earliest. No further direction is required. This Crl.M.C. is disposed of accordingly. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt