IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. W. P. No. 1491 of 2011 Date of Decision : August 24, 2011 Surinder Kumar .... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab for respondents no.1 to 3. Mr. H. S. Baath, Advocate for respondents no. 4 and 5. Mr. J. K. Goel, Advocate for respondents no.6 to 9. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Replies on behalf of respondents no.4 and 5, filed today in Court, are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Copy given to the opposite counsel. Learned counsel for the parties state that the alleged detenue Kumari Neetu is now staying with the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid, the instant Habeas Corpus writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. August 24, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE