IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. O. O. C. J. O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO. 1093 OF 1998 WRIT PETITION NO. 1093 OF 1998 WRIT PETITION NO. 1093 OF 1998 Amartara Plastics Ltd. ... Petitioners V/s The Municipal Corpn. of Gr. Bombay & anr... Respondents Mr. Aditya Chitale for the petitioners. Mr. Purandare for Municipal Corporation. Mr. R.J. Mane for the State. CORAM: S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: S. RADHAKRISHNAN & P.V. KAKADE, JJ. P.V. KAKADE, JJ. P.V. KAKADE, JJ. DATED: 2ND SEPT., 2004. DATED: 2ND SEPT., 2004. DATED: 2ND SEPT., 2004. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and respondent Municipal Corporation as well as the learned A.G.P. for the State. The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that in view of the observations of the Supreme Court in Municipal Municipal Municipal Corporation of Thane v/s Asmaco Plastic Industries, Corporation of Thane v/s Asmaco Plastic Industries, Corporation of Thane v/s Asmaco Plastic Industries, reported in A.I.R. 1990 SC 2440, reported in A.I.R. 1990 SC 2440, reported in A.I.R. 1990 SC 2440, the petition does not survive. In view thereof, the Rule stands discharged. (S. Radhakrishnan, J.) 2 ( P. V. Kakade, J. )