1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 11641 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 11641 OF 2010 *** 1. Heard Advocate Shri Gore for Petitioner, Advocate Shri Vibhute for Respondent Nos.5 to 9 and 12 to 15 and learned A.G.P. Mr. K. J. Ghute Patil for Respondent/ State authorities. 2. Motion of no confidence has been carried by majority of 11 against 1 against the petitioner. That motion was questioned before Collector unsuccessfully and thereafter before Additional Commissioner. Additional Commissioner also found no substance in the challenge. 3. Advocate Shri Gore has urged that only on one day before Collector petitioner/ his counsel was absent and on that day the Collector decided the matter. As opportunity of hearing was not extended, serious prejudice has been caused to the cause of the petitioner. According to him, the notice for meeting did not contain relevant material and the reasons given in that notice were not fully discussed in the meeting. Advocate Vibhute states that the petitioner was present in that meeting, he participated in discussion and thereafter chose to file the 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 11641 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. appeal. The authorities have concurrently found the motion as legal and valid. 4. I have perused both the orders. The orders show that contentions advanced were looked into. If petitioner wanted to demonstrate that denial of personal hearing has resulted in any prejudice to him, it was necessary for him to formulate that point of prejudice and then to substantiate it with reference to relevant material on record. There is no such effort. 5. I do not find any jurisdictional error or perversity. Petition rejected. No costs. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:07/01/2011. ans/11641