1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.11.2016 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM Crl.O.P.(MD) No.21032 of 2016 Rajesh @ Rajeshkannan : Petitioner/Sole Accused -vs- 1.State rep. By The Inspector of Police, S.S.Kottai Police Station, Sivagangai District. : 1st respondent/Complainant 2.Anandan : 2nd respondent/De-facto Complainant Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to the proceedings in C.C.No.201 of 2013 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppathur, Sivagangai and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.A.V.Arun For 1st Respondent : Mr.K.Anbarasan Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) For 2nd Respondent : Mr.B.Santhanam Rajeshkumar O R D E R This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records relating to C.C.No.201 of 2013 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppathur, Sivagangai District, in connection with the case in Crime No.61 of 2013 for the offence under Sections 323 and 506(I) IPC, on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same. 2.Today when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning, the petitioner/Sole Accused and the de-facto complainant along with their counsel appeared in person. They have filed a joint Memorandum of compromise stating that the matter has already been compromised between the parties and the de-facto complainant has no objection to quash the entire proceedings in connection with C.C.No. 201 of 2013 on the file of the District Munsif-cum- Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppathur, Sivagangai District stating that the disputes have been settled between them. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 petitioner is willing to denote Rs.5,000/- to Rojavanam Homeless & Aged Care Centre, Melur Road, Uthankudy, Madurai. 3.In view of the above, this court Permitted the petitioner to pay Rs.5,000/- to Rojavanam Homeless & Aged Care Centre, Melur Road, Uthankudy, Madurai and also this court dispensed with the appearance of the parties. 4.In the afternoon, when the matter is called, the receipt has been filed. In view of the statement made by the parties and the joint compromise memo filed by them, no fruitful purpose will be achieved to proceed further in this matter. 5.In view of that, this petition is allowed and the entire proceedings in respect of C.C.No.201 of 2013 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppathur, Sivagangai District, is quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form part of the record. sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar er To, 1 The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppathur, Sivagangai 2.The Inspector of Police, S.S.Kottai Police Station, Sivagangai District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High court, Madurai. +1CC to Mr.A.V.Arun, Advocate Sr.No.66331 +1CC to Mr.Santhanam Rajeshkumar, Advocate Sr.No.66330 GJM/SS2/28.11.16-2p-6C Crl.O.P.(MD) No.21032 of 2016 04.11.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/