HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:2844 OF 2010 Dated: 12.11.2010 Between: Makina Mohan Sai Kumar. ..Petitioner And 1. Makina Majula and others. .. Respondents This Court made the following HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:2844 OF 2010 ORDER: This is a revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to revise the order, dated 7.5.2010 passed by the Family Court-cum-IV Additional District & Sessions Judge, Vijayawada in I.A.No.144 of 2010 in O.P.No.643 of 2009. The petitioner herein is the husband and the 1st respondent is his wife and respondents 2 and 3 are their children. The respondents filed the above O.P. for maintenance. It is the case of the 1st respondent-wife that having failed to bear the harassment made by the petitioner-husband, she filed O.P.No.509 of 2000 for divorce and the same was allowed and later, the petitioner herein neglected to maintain her and her children and even though, she got divorce, she and her children are entitled to claim maintenance and educational expenses and the petitioner-husband is working in Railways and getting Rs.60,000/- per month. The petitioner-husband contested the matter before the Court below stating that after divorce he married another woman and got two children and he has to maintain them. He denied that he is getting Rs.60,000/- per month. He stated that his salary is Rs.30,000/- and nearly Rs.14,000/- is being deducted for personal loans. He further stated that the 1st respondent is having immovable property and she is getting Rs.25,000/- per month and she is also doing a job. Pending the O.P., the respondents herein filed the above application seeking to grant interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.7,000/- p.m., to the 1st respondent and Rs.3,000/- per month each to respondents 2 and 3 pending disposal of the main O.P. Before the Court below, the petitioner herein has agreed to give maintenance to respondents 2 and 3. Considering the said submission made by the petitioner-husband, the Court below awarded maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per month each to his children viz., respondents 2 and 3. Aggrieved by the same, the present revision has been filed by the petitioner. Heard the learned Counsel and perused the material available on record. The order under revision goes to show that the petitioner agreed to pay maintenance to his children viz., respondents 2 and 3. In view of his consent, the Court below passed the order under revision. Now, the approach of the petitioner challenging the said order does not appear to be a bonafide one and the same is nothing but amounting to abuse of process of the Courts. Hence, the order under revision does not warrant any interference by this Court. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________________ Justice A. Gopal Reddy Date: 12 November, 2010 Nn. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:2844 OF 2010 12.11.2010