IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36203 of 2010 MD.MAHTAB Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04/ 10.12.2010 A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner mentioning the fact that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Although as per prosecution case, petitioner was caught with stolen motorcycle while he was fleeing from the place of occurrence but the stand of petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated in this case at the behest of Pramukh against whom he had worked in election. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that admittedly, no fire arm was recovered from possession of the petitioner. So, non-recovery of fire arm creates doubt about prosecution story. Taking into consideration the submissions as well as facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner (Md Mahtab) is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM, Araria in Araria (Bairgachhi) P.S. Case no. 93 of 2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)