IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Oivision Bendl I>ETITIONER APPELLANT Review Petition No. ^k Of 2011 : ^Farachand Jangade, S/o Antaram, aged about 45 years (owner of vehicle), R/o Village Mutpuri, P.S. Nandghat, Tahsil Bemetara, Distt.-Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS > Snit. Anand Kuraari, Wd/o Milap Dhruv, aged about 23 years. ^ ^^ ;-^v Fy/<^ ^ <r^•y <y ov> k Chhabiram, S/o Milap Dhruv, aged about 1 year and 9 months, Minor- Through natural guardian mother Smt. Anand Bai Wd/o Milap Dhruv. ,3. Chaiti Bai, W/o Krishna Dhruv, aged about 53 years. 4. Dhruv, Village Station Bemetara, ^' Krishna S/o Mantrara aged about 55 years, All are resident of Mutpuri, Police Nandghat, Tahsil Distt. Durg (C.G.) CLAIMANTS/RESPONDENTS No. lto4 Suruj Satnami @ Gajendra, S/o Nirkhal Das (Driver) aged about 23 years, R/o Village Khapri, Police Station Nandghat, Tahsil Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) National Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office -I, Bhutani Complex, G.E. Road, Ware House, Bhilai(C.G.) Respondent No. 5 & 6 ^- REVIEW APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR CORAM: Hon'bleShri I.M. Quddusi. J. & Kon'bie Shri Prashfint Kumar Mishra. J. PETITIONER APPELLANT RESPONDENTS PETITIONER APPELLANT RESPONDENTS REVIEW PETmON No.86 of 2011 Tarachand Jangade. Versus Smt. Anand Kumari and others. AND REVIEW PETmON No.91 of 2011 Tarachand Jangade. Versus Smt. Sukhni Bai and others. REVIEW PETITION UNDERORDER47 RULE 1 C.P.C.. 1908 Shri H.B. Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Smt. Meera Jaiswal, counsel for the petitsoners. ORAL ORDER (29/09/2011) Following oral order of the Court was passed by I. M. Quddusi. J. The aforesaid Review Petitions are disposed of by this common order as the petitioner in both the petitions is same. I.A. No.1, application for condonation of delay in filing the petition, On due consideration, delay is condoned. The entire amount was directed to be deposited by the appellant vide order dated 01/03/2011 in MA.(C) No. 1636/2008 and M.A.(C) No. 1637/2008 but the appellant is unable to deposit and proceedings are held up before the Claims Tribunal, therefore, in the interest ofjustice we direct that in place of the entire amount, half of the amount shall be deposited within three montte. Both the review petifion are disposed of vwth the above observation and the order dated 1st March, 2011 passed in M.A.(C) No. 1636/2008 and M.A.(C) No. 1637/2008 shall stand modified. __ Sd//- Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge K