IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22129 of 2010 RAJAN KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the Rice Mill owner is facing prosecution under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. On the information that the petitioner is doing illegal trade of subsidized rice supplied by the government to F.C.I. for various schemes the alleged seizure was made. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no control on the rice and so far the apprehension of the prosecution of the rice being found in the F.C.I. bags are concerned, the petitioner used to receive the paddy from F.C.I. under the agreement and after converting the paddy into rice it was supplied to the F.C.I. Hence, in that circumstance, the alleged rice was recovered from the petitioner. This submission has been recorded by the learned Sessions Judge also which gets reflected from the impugned order. 2 The impugned order also reflects that the agreement between the petitioner and F.C.I. was brought on record before the learned court below. Considering the aforesaid fact, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Chanpatia P.S. Case No. 115 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. West Champaran at Bettiah, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)