IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13307 of 2010 SAJJAD, Son of Anamul, resident of Village- Kamaldaha, P.S. Kursakanta, District-Araria........................................................................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR.........................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 11.05.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 376A of the I.P.C. I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner only on the ground that the occurrence relates back to the year 2001. However, I have not applied my mind on the merits of the case. The certified copy of the judgment dated 14.08.2004 has been produced before me reflecting that other accused Wazuddin has been acquitted on the retracted evidence of the complainant and the petitioner was under the impression that the case has already been closed due to acquittal of other accused. Let the petitioner surrder and on his surrender, his bail application will be considered by the learned court below considering this fact that other accused has 2 been acquitted and the complainant has retracted from her initial version of the case. The regular bail application if possible may be considered on the same day. With this observation, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed. Let the order be faxed to the court below at the cost of the petitioner. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)