In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 2766 of 2009 Date of decision: October 26, 2009 Tarsem Kumar .. Petitioner Vs. Natha Singh .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Sheery K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J From the report as made by the Registry, it appears that once the respondent evaded service and other time he refused to accept the service. Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the Appellate Court has allowed the appeal of the respondent-defendant without any condition, whereas, the Appellate Court should have asked for furnishing security of the decretal amount and also direct the trial court to expedite the suit. In these circumstances, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial court to decide the suit as expeditiously as possible. As regard furnishing of security, the plaintiff would be at liberty to move appropriate application before the trial court, if the law so permits. October 26, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge