1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. WRIT PETITION NO.2564 OF 2011 Prithviraj S/o.Purushottam Hazare & Ors. .. Petitioners V/s State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Suresh Kulkarni with Mr.Virendra Ichalkarnjikar for the petitioners. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the State. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE: 14th November, 2011. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. According to the petitioners even if the contents of the FIR are to be taken as it is, at its face value, no offence under the provisions of Section 153A and/or 153B of the Indian Penal Code will be attracted. In support of this submission, learned counsel for the petitioners is placing reliance on the decisions in the case of Varsha Publication Pvt.Ltd.& Another V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. - 1983 Cr.L.J.1446 and in the case of Manzar Sayeed Khan V/s. State of Maharashtra & Another - (2007) 5 SCC 1. 2. Even if this submission were to be accepted, that does not take the matter any further for the petitioners. It is not the argument of the 2 petitioners that no offence whatsoever is made out on the basis of the contents of the FIR. Considering the fact that the chargesheet has already been filed by the local police before the appropriate Court, we have no manner of doubt that the concerned Court while framing the charges would be well advised to frame the appropriate charges as may be attracted, considering the allegations contained in the FIR and the material accompanied in the chargesheet. While doing so, the concerned Court can consider the grievance of the petitioners that the offence under the provisions of Section 153A and/or 153B of the IPC is not attracted at all. 3. We leave all the contentions raised in that behalf open to be considered at the appropriate stage. No case for interference at this stage is made out in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)