IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2009 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 8755 of 2009(L) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- GRACY VARGHESE, KURICHIPARA VEEDU, ARIUPLACHY P.O., KARUVIKONAM, ANCHAL, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER/MOTOR VEHICLE TAXATION OFFICER, KOLLAM. BY GOV. PLEADER SRI. P.. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.8755 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of March, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that the permit granted in his favour was revoked as per Ext.P2. That was challenged in appeal before the Tribunal by filing MVAA.No.405/08. The appeal was disposed of by Ext.P3 judgment and the RTO was ordered to issue the granted permit after settlement of timings. In pursuance to Ext.P3, the RTA by Ext.P4 directed the respondent to implement Ext.P3. The complaint in this writ petition is that the permit ordered t0 be granted has not issued so far. Taking into account the directions issued in Exts.P3 and P4 proceedings of the RTA, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to settle the timings and issue permit, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 8 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the petitioner satisfied all other statutory requirements. vi (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/