THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.1895 of 2008 Dated 13th October, 2011 Between: Smt.L.Kausalya Bai (died) rep.by LR, L.M.Laxman Murthy …Petitioner And The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation rep.by its Commissioner, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri V.Ravinder Rao For Sri P.R.Prasad Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2: Ms.V.Jaya Sree For Sri C.Damodar Reddy Counsel for respondent No.3: Sri K.S.R.Murthy The Court made the following: ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner ventilated in this writ petition is that at the instance of respondent No.3, respondent Nos.1 and 2 are seeking to construct a wall hardly leaving any space for the petitioner to have proper ingress and egress to her house situated at plot bearing Nos.43 and 44. The petitioner filed photographs to substantiate this plea. On a prima facie observation of this Court, it was felt that respondent Nos.1 and 2 have been excavating trenches close to the petitioner’s house. Therefore, this Court appointed an Advocate Commissioner by passing a detailed order, dated 21.09.2011. The Advocate Commissioner has accordingly submitted her report along with a sketch, which discloses that the width of the lane between the community hall and the petitioner’s house varies from 19’ x 2’’ to 19’ x 10’’. At the hearing, the learned counsel for the parties have not disputed the correctness of the report of the Advocate Commissioner. As respondent Nos.1 and 2 have been maintaining that they are willing to leave 10’ from the house of the petitioner and raise a compound wall in order to protect the park and the community hall and the learned counsel for the petitioner has accepted this proposal, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to leave clear 10’ space from the compound wall to the house of the petitioner in plot Nos.43 and 44 and raise the compound wall, in order to ensure that proper access to the petitioner’s house and also for the general public will be available. Subject to the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 13th October, 2011 VGB