vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.570 OF 2006 SECOND APPEAL NO.570 OF 2006 SECOND APPEAL NO.570 OF 2006 Paras Nenmal Jain & anr. ... Appellants V/s. Shri Nirmal Sahakari Society & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.V.G. Mujumdar for Appellants Ms.Chandana Salgaonkar-Raida for Respondent No.1 Mr.S.V. Pitre for Respondent No.2 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. DATED: JULY 11, 2007 JULY 11, 2007 JULY 11, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The Second Appeal does not raise any substantial question of law. It is sought to be contended what the sale deed mentions 40 ares of land. Both the Courts below have held that the plaintiff is entitled to only 31 ares of land. This is obviously so because admittedly the permission was obtained for purchase of only 31 ares of land. Thus the appellant was entitled to only 31 ares of land. Appeal is therefore, dismissed.