HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.30444 OF 2010 ORDER: The petitioner claims to have been appointed as Principal in the 4th respondent Institution. This Writ Petition is filed with a prayer to declare the action of the respondents in preventing the petitioner from discharging the duties as Principal. 2. The 4th respondent filed a counter – affidavit denying the allegations. It is stated that the petitioner is not appointed as Principal and only for a limited period, she has discharged the duties of In- charge Principal. 3. The 2nd respondent filed a counter – affidavit stating that according to the information received by him, the petitioner is worked as In-charge Principal for some period during 2008 - 09 and 2009 - 10 and with effect from 01-11-2010 Sri Y. Syam Kurpakar is functioning as Principal. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for School Education, learned counsel for the 3rd respondent and the learned Counsel for the 4th respondent. 5. The 4th respondent is a Private Educational Institution. The appointment of the petitioner is not under any statutory provision. In case, she has been appointed as Principal and is wrongfully prevented, she can file a suit. The writ petition cannot be maintained against a Private Educational Institution not receiving any grant-in-aid. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to work out her remedies in a Civil Court. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J August 25, 2011. KTL