.-^ ^ C-P\^ IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION LSJ No.^^ /2009 PETITIONER \^A^ ^•;QA\°-r ,-»^-v ^ €./ ^" <y-" RESPONDENTS: /A^T.":i'^'"' /'^ '^ •- <'t'^ '\ ' ^'^, I <@j ^i^s^hlU^li ^Vl>. V^^J T^»^ r Pramesh Patel S/o Shri Gajadh<§ir Singh Patel aged about 34 years, Upper Division Teacher . (mathematics) Govt. Middle School, Reda (D) Block Dabhara, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) r' 2. Director, Public Interaction Chhattisgarh, Raipur 3. The District Education Officer, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) WRIT UNDBR ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA L.-.^—-.-.—- l: . HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.4315 OF 2GOS PETiTiONER Smt. Jlxender Lamba Versus RESPONDENTS State of ChhattisQarh & Others And W.P.(S) Nos.5981, 5448, 5450. 5451, 5483, 5484, 5485, 5584, 5758, 5785, 57S3, 5805, 5813, 5815, 5819, S820, 582S, 5839, 5889, 5890, 5891, 5018, 6094,6204, 6339, S340, 6423, S438, 5290, 5518, 5533, 5578, 5611, 5SS1, 5S91,5811,5817,5927, 5930, SS21 & SS22 of 2009. (Wrii Petitions under Articie 226 of the Constitutlon of india) Slngie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotn, J. Present:< Shri H.B. Agrav/aS, Sr. Advocate w»th Ms Meera Jaiswai, Shri P.P. Sahu, Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Shri P.R. Paxankar, Shrs Manoj Paranjape, Shri Uttam Pandey, Shri C.J.K. Rao, Shri Roop Nalk, Shri A.S. Rajput, Shri K.S. Pawar, Shft Ajay Shrivastava, Shri R.R. Soni, Shri V.K. Pandey and Shri Ashwani Shukia, Advocates for the respective petstsoners. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. Advocate General for the State of Chhattssgarh and Its authonties. 3. ORDER fCRAL) (Passed on this 12tn day of November, 2009) With the consent of iearned counse! appearing tor ths parties, the petitions are heard fsnaily. In thss batch of matters it has been brought to the notice of the Court that the transfer orders have been passed without compSying with the poilcy and in some cases the orders having been executed aiso requife reconsideration. Shri Thakur, learned Dy. Advocate General appearlng for the State, on instructions, very rairiy submits that all the cases of the petitloners pendlng consideration before this Court shall be considered afresh, after arfordlng proper opportunity of hearing io the parties concerned, to examine asto whether the transfer ^ orders have been passed in accordance with the poljcy and till that time the petjtsoners hereii^ shail not be d.5turbed. 4. 3n vlew of foregoing, according to learned counse! appearing for the respective petationers nothing survlves in these petitions for adjudication. 5. AccordJngSy, the petitlons being W.P. (S) SMos.4315, 5981, 5448, 5450, 5451, 5483, 5484, 5485, 5584, 575S, 5785, 57S3, 5805, 5813, 5815, 5819, 5820, 5826, 5833, 5889, 5890, 5891, S018,6094, 8204, S339,6340, S423, S438, 5290, 5518, 5533, 5578, 5611, 5S81, 5S91, 5811, 5817, 5927, 5930, SS21 & 6622 of 2009 are dlsposed of. However, on the basis of submiission made by the learned Dy. Advocate Generai, it is made ciear that the petnioners herears shaii continue on iheir respective piaces of posting, as obtains today,.tiii disposal of their respective cases, In accordance w^th law and on its own rnents. 6. No ofder asto costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Gowri Judge