-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 7551 OF 2003 Chandigi Ram Yadav & Ors.... ... Petitioners. Versus Union of India and others....... ... Respondents. None for the Petitioners. CORAM : R. M. LODHA & CORAM : R. M. LODHA & CORAM : R. M. LODHA & NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. DATED : 11TH AUGUST, 2006. DATED : 11TH AUGUST, 2006. DATED : 11TH AUGUST, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : On 17th April, 2006 the following order came to be passed: "Four weeks’ time is granted to the petitioners to take appropriate steps to serve the unserved respondents. Put up after four weeks." 2. Incidentally, nobody appeared for the parties on that date. 3. Strangely, the office seems to have issued court notice to petitioner nos.1 to 5. Whereas, the order was to the petitioners to take appropriate steps to serve -: 2 :- unserved respondents. Where was the question for the office to issue notice to the petitioners when there was no such order. Registrar (Judicial) is directed to hold inquiry as to how the office issued notice to the petitioners in the month of May, 2006 when there was no such order and identify the erring official and take suitable action against the said official, so that such lapses may not recur in future. The report shall be submitted by the Registrar (Judicial) within three weeks from today. 4. Neither the petitioners nor their Counsel is present. Nor any steps have been taken by them for service. In the circumstances, we are constrained to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. Order accordingly. Sd/- (R. M. LODHA, J.) (R. M. LODHA, J.) (R. M. LODHA, J.) Sd/- (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)