IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 6116 of 2008. Decided on: 06.12.2010. _________________________________________________________ Des Raj Awasthi. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Petitioner was terminated w.e.f. 2nd November, 1973 vide office order dated 30th January, 1994. Thereafter he had made representation/appeal vide Annexure A-2, dated 28th April, 1998 and thereafter lastly by way of reminder vide Annexure A-4, dated 6th October, 1998. Same has not been decided till date. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to decide the appeal preferred by the petitioner against his termination order dated 30.1.1974, within a period of eight weeks after production of certified copy of this judgment. Since the petitioner had been pursuing his remedy diligently before this Court, the limitation will not come in his way, in view of Section 14 of the Limitation 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - Act. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 06, 2010. (sck).