IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5876 of 2011 1. NADEEM ANWAR 2. NOORUL HAQUE Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 18.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Although, it is stated that petitioner no. 1 tried to provide intoxicated tea to the informant but admittedly, informant doubted upon the activities of petitioner no. 1 and, thereafter, petitioners were caught and produced before the police. Subsequently, search was made and some ativan tablets, mobile sets and one A.T.M. card were recovered but even after completion of the entire investigation, police could not succeed to locate the owner of A.T.M. card as well as above stated mobile sets. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that, as a matter of fact, nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioners and the alleged recovery is nothing but only a creation of the police. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Patna G.R.P.S. Case No. 470 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)