IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29719 of 2009 1. AJIT KUMAR Son of Suresh Thakur Resident of Village- Patahi P.S.- Sadar District- Muzaffarpur 2. Anshu Kumar Son of Late Sunil Singh R/o Village- Ararar P.S.- Sadar District- Muzaffarpur --------------Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ---------Opposite Parties ----------- 2. 19.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that now there is a compromise between the parties, I am inclined to grant bail to the above named petitioners on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No. 127/2009, subject to the conditions, (i) that the Magistrate will issue notice to the informant and verify from himself whether the compromise has actually been filed by them or not and in case the informant supports the factum of compromise (ii) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and (iii) that the - 2 - bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. P. Kumar (Anjana Prakash, J.)