HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Review Petition No. 21 of 2009 1 APPLICANTS Shriram Gandhi s/o Shri Bhagatram, aged about 48 years. Occupation Cioth Marchant, R/o In front of Bank of india, Dayaiband, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). Jogendra Singh Chaw‘a s/o Late Shri Harbhajan Singh Chawla, aged about 51 years, R/o Daya§band, Distt. Bi!aspur (CG). Smt. Kamla Devi Gupta (Died), w/o Shri Harkeshwar Gupta, Through iegai heirs (son) Shyam Ku. Gupta, S/o Late Shri Harkeshwer Prasad Gupta, aged about 30 years, Rio Haihri Chowk, Juna Biiaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). Manoharial Gidwani S/o Shri Bhagwandas Gidwani R/o in front of Geeta Hotel, Bus 'Stand, Distt. Biiaspur (CG). Jagpal Singh slo Shri Charan Singh, aged about 43 years, r/a Gondpara, Distt. Bilaspu: (CG). Smt. Amrit Kaur wlo Shri Surinder Singh Gumber r/o Adarsh Colony, Distt. Biiaspur (CG). Ganesh Prasad Ghore, r/o Dayaiband, Distt. Biiaspur (CG). Smt. Neena Devi Ahuja w/o Shri Ashok Ahuja, Down Studio Gali, Disti. Biiaspur (CG). Prakash Chand, Prakash Cioth Stores rlo Gol Bazar, Diett. Biiaspur (CG). Parasnath Rai slo Shri Kuraon Rai r/o Laikhadan, Bilaspur. Versus State of Chhattisgarh (Eariier MP) Through the Secretary, Department o’f Locai Seif Administration, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) (Eariier Vaiiabh Bhawan, Bhopal) The Secretary, Department of Revenue, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) (Earlier Vailabh Bhawan, Bhopal) The Secretary, Department of Housing & Envirenment, DK8 Bhawan, Raipur (CG) (Earlier Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal) The Collector, Bilaspur (CG). RESPONDENTS A r TWNq 10 Kz ‘ m Zf‘ 5. The Municipal Corporation, Through Commissioner, BHaspur, Disttii Biiaspur (CG). The Joint Dimctor, Town & Country Manning Authgrity, Bi!a$pur, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). Mahendraia! Saluja S/o $hri Budh Singh Saluja' r/o in front of Dr. Ghosh CTinic, Tikrapara, Main Road‘ Bilaspur‘ Dr. Vijay Krishna Dbdt S/o Shri Krishna Gangadhar Dixit, aged about 57 years, rio Dixit Clinic, Kududant. Bilaspur. Dr. Prakash Ladikar S/o Shri Sarangdhar Ladikar, aged about 63 years, rlo Rishi Colony, Dayaibandh, Biiaspur. 10 Durga Prasad Kachhi (Kashyap) 5/0 Shri Shrikrishna Kachhi, aged about 75 years, R/o Near Bus Stand. Shiv Taikies Road, Bilaspur. 11 Ram Bihore Kachhi S/o Shri Shrikrishna Kachhi, RIO Telipara, Biiaspur. 12 Sunii Chhabda slo Shri R.L.Chhabada, Through: Chhabda Corporation, in front of Anand Hotei, New Bus Stand Road, Biiaspur. 13 Anii Chhabda S/o Shri R.L.Chhabda Through: Chhabda Enterprises, in front of Anand Hotel, New Bus stand Road, Biiaspur. 14 Ku. Rekha Panda, D/o $hri Ram Narayan Pade, rlo Goi Bazar, Biiaspur. 15 Ku. Meena D/o Shri Bhaohand ji r/o Sarkanda, Tahsii/District Biiaspur. 16 Mohanlai Slo Shri Laxmandas rlo Sindhi Colony, Bilaspur. 17 Smt. Shakira Khan wlo Naim Khan r/o Tikrapara, Bilaspur. 18 Rajendra Chawla s/o Late Shri Harbhajan Singh Chawla. R/o Dayalband, Bilaspur. 19 Lochan Chawla sic Late Shri Santosh Singh rlo Rishi Colony, Bilaspur. 20 Kulwant Gumber s/o Shri Kariar Singh Gumber, r/o Dayalband near Gurudwara, Bilaspur. (Application for review and recall the order dated 9-2-2009 passed in W.P.No.1408 of 1998) Singie Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J \N v Present : Shri H.S. Ahulwaiia, counsel for the petitioners. Ms Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State. / Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, counsel for the Municipal Corporation. Bilaspur. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 28aiday of‘April, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that by this review petition the petitioners seek modification in para 3 of the order dated 9-2—2009 (Annexure - N1) passed by this Court in Mahenolralal Saluja & Others vs. State of Madhye Pradesh & Others‘. to the extent that the review petitioners may also be permitted to make representation before the authorities concerned for consideration while deciding the issue with regard to widening of the road. 2) Shri Kachhawaha, learned counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, submits that if the review petttioners make representations they would be heard and their representations would be considered, in accordance with law and on its own merits, while taking the hnai decision with regard to widening of the road. 3) ln View of the categorical statement made by Shri Kachhawaha, learned counset appearing for the Municipal Corporation, Biiaspur, no further order is necessary in this review petition. Accordingiy, the review petition stands disposed of. Sdl- Satish K. Agniiaotri Judge Gowri 1 WP No.1408 of 1998