IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 4TH JULY 2011 / 13TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 15905 of 2011(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- BAIJU.K.J., S/O.JOHNY, 2/152, KEEZHEDATH HOUSE, P.O.POOMALA, THEKKUMKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR. C.A.CHACKO RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 001. 2. THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, THRISSUR-680 001. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHELAKKARA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 586. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. P. N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C0 NO. 15905 OF 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT. P1 : TRUE COPY OF R.C. BOOK OF PETITIONERS' VEHICLE. EXT. P2 : TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 29.01.2011 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT. P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 11.02.2011 /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P (C) No . 15905 of 2011 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 04th July , 2011 JUDGMENT This Writ Petition was considered and disposed of on 14.06.2011, directing to consider the claim for interim custody of the vehicle bearing No. KL AT 3505 seized by the 3rd respondent, allegedly for illegal transporting river sand. The actual relief sought for was to have finalization of Ext. P3 proceedings, which is a revision petition preferred before the first respondent, against Ext. P2 order already passed by the second respondent under the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act (though the same has been described as an appeal). On pointing out the mistake, the matter is posted again before this Court on today as “to be spoken to”. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. After hearing both the sides and on going through the pleadings and records, this Court finds that the judgment dated 14.06.2011 requires to be recalled and hence the same is recalled. The writ petition is heard afresh and disposed of in the following terms. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances, the writ petition is W.P. (C) No. 15905 of 2011 : 2 : disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext. P3 revision petition and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for further steps. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd