IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P. Nos. 3566, 3567 and 3586 of 2010 Date of decision: 29th June, 2010. 1. CWP No. 3566 of 2010 Nokh Ram ….Petitioner Versus State of HP & ors …Respondents CWP No. 3567 of 2010 Ganga Dhar Thakur ….Petitioner Versus State of HP & ors …Respondents CWP No. 3586 of 2010 Devi Ram ….Petitioner Versus State of HP & ors …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. ____________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs in these writ petitions:- “CWP No.3566 of 2010 (i) Directing the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner w.e.f. 24.3.2000 instead of September, 2007 on the analogy of Shri Som Dass son of Shri Parma Nand working in the same Range as that of the petitioner, in view of Annexure P-5 with all consequential benefits including seniority and arrears accruing thereon on this account. “CWP No.3567 of 2010 (i) Directing the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner w.e.f. 1.10.1999 instead of September, 2007 on the analogy of Shri Som Dass son of Shri Parma Nand working in the same Range as that of the petitioner, in view of Annexure P-5 with all consequential benefits including seniority and arrears accruing thereon on this account. “CWP No.3586 of 2010 (i) Directing the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner w.e.f. 7.5.1998 instead of August, 2006 on the analogy of Shri Som Dass son of Shri Parma Nand working in the same Range as that of the petitioner, in view of Annexure P-5 with all consequential benefits including seniority and arrears accruing thereon on this account.” 2. It is submitted that the matter has been considered by the State Administrative Tribunal and the order of Tribunal was challenged before this court and this court has dismissed the same, as can be seen from Annexure P-3 judgement in CWP No. 420 of 2006. It is further submitted that said judgement has been accepted and implemented by the State. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner are similarly situated persons, like the petitioner in the said case. The petitioners have submitted Annexure P-4 to first respondent. 3. There will be a direction to first respondent to look into all the aspects of the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law and justice without discriminating the petitioners. This will be done within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order alongwith the copy of writ petition. All the writ petitions are disposed of so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 29th June, 2010(K) (Justice Kuldip Singh), Judge