IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G. ROHINI CONTEMPT CASE NO : 1143 of 2009 Between: T. Gangadhar ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Y. Sri Lakshmi and others. .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G. ROHINI CONTEMPT CASE NO : 1143 of 2009 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) The present Contempt Case is filed alleging violation of the orders dated 11.3.2004 in W.P.No.872 of 2004. Heard the learned Counsel and perused the material available on record. The material on record goes to show that on the earlier occasion, the petitioner filed contempt cases twice viz., CC Nos.876 of 2004 and CC No.467 of 2005 alleging violation of the orders impugned herein and both the contempt cases failed. While closing the contempt case No.467 of 2005, the Division Bench of this Court observed as follows: “Having taken note of the action already taken on behalf of the authorities and especially, this being a comprehensive general nature of complaint rather than any specific individual, we are of the view that it is not necessary to go into the same. However, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue other remedies in accordance with law by bringing to the notice of the authorities concerned i.e., Department of Mines and Geology, Ongole, against any such violations, we do not find any contempt arising in the facts and circumstances.” Now, even though a contention has been raised before us by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the order dated 11.3.2004 in W.P.No.872 of 2004 has not been complied with so far, but in view of the fact that the petitioner has already availed the remedy of contempt case twice and in view of the observations of the Division Bench in C.C.No.467 of 2005, we are not inclined to entertain this contempt case. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari _________________ Justice G. Rohini Date: 3rd March, 2010 nn. THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G. ROHINI CONTEMPT CASE NO :1143 of 2009 (Order delivered by the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) 03/03/2010