IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-3748 of 2008 Date of Order: 24.03.2008 Sonu ...Petitioner Versus State of U.T., Chandigarh. ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Pardeep Singh Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hemant Bassi, Standing counsel for UT, Chandigarh. RAJESH BINDAL J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the FIR, there is no specific allegation that the petitioner had abducted the daughter of the complainant. It is registered only on the basis of suspicion. After the registration of the FIR, the police party went in search of the alleged daughter of the complainant to Agra where the petitioner had gone to attend the marriage of his Bhua. The petitioner was found there. However, the daughter of the complainant was not there. The claim of the petitioner is that he was away to Agra from 17.04.2007 onwards and cannot possibly be involved in the case of kidnapping of the daughter of the complainant. During the investigation, no direct evidence has come involving the petitioner in the crime. The case is built up on the circumstantial evidence. The petitioner is in custody for the last 10 months. Be that as it may, without opining on the merits of the controversy, It is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh. The petition is disposed of. March 24, 2008 (RAJESH BINDAL) nt JUDGE