IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 18TH JULY 2008 / 27TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 5077 of 2005(D) ------------------------------------ PETITIONERS: -------------------- 1. P.M. FAZALUDEEN, PLAVILA VEEDU, OYUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. M. FAZALUDEEN, HARIZ MANZIL, MAYENA P.O., OYUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. S. SHARAFUDEEN, KALPAKA VILASAM, CHENKULAM P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. 4. O. SUBAIRKANNU, PARANGIMAMVILA VEEDU, PAYYANKODE, OYUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 5. V. RAMACHANDRAN, VATTAVILA PUTHENVEEDU, UMMALLOOR, OYUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 6. V.K. KUTTAPPAN, MINI MANDIRAM, KARINGANNOOR, OYUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT (J) DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS, DIRECTORATE OF PANCHAYATS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. VELINALLOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VELINALLOOR P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW ADV. SRI.K.G.RENGANATH - R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).5077/2005-D APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS DATED 15/02/2004 . EXT.P2: COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 06/04/2004 WRITTEN BY KODIKUNNIL SURESH M.P. TO THE HON'BLE MINSTER FOR LOCAL ADMINSTRATION. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 17/04/2004 WRITTEN BY EZHUKONE NARAYANAN TO THE HON'BLE MINSTER FOR LOCAL ADMINISTRATION. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE REPLY GIVEN BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 01/07/2004. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL // TRUE COPY // Rs/ KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.5077 of 2005 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 18th July, 2008. J U D G M E N T The grievance is on Ext.P4 order passed by the first respondent. In view of the facts as stated in the counter affidavit, in case the petitioners have still any dispute on the factual position, they may approach the first respondent, in which case, the matter will be duly considered by the first respondent with notice to the petitioners and the third respondent. The writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.5077 of 2005 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 18th July, 2008.