S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION NO.29/2008 IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7254/2007 (Mani Ram Vs. State & Ors.) Date of order :: 17.3.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. R.L. Jangid, for the petitioners. By way of filing present misc. application, learned counsel for the petitioner has sought rectification in the order dated 27.2.2008. In the application, it is stated that a bunch of six identical writ petitions was decided by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 27.2.2008. However, the order which was passed in SB Civil Writ Petition No.7254/2007 was different as the said writ petition was dismissed as pre-mature with the liberty to petitioner to file fresh writ petition. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that inadvertently, the order which was passed in SB Civil Writ Petition No.7254/2007 was drawn in SB Civil Writ Petition No.7104/2007 and vice versa. Therefore, he prays for necessary corrections. Accordingly, the application9+ is allowed. The order dated 27.2.2008 passed in this writ petition is recalled and it is directed that in place of the said order, the following order may be read in SB Civil Writ Petition No.7254/2007 : “Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this case, it is submitted by learned Addl. Advocate General appearing for the respondents that no notice has been issued to the petitioner. Further, it is submitted that now the respondents are not taking any action against the petitioner and they are waiting for the report of the Committee. Therefore, this writ petition is pre-mature. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is free to file fresh writ petition as and when any cause of action arises and the petitioner will be at liberty to raise all the grounds which are taken in the present writ petition.” (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun