IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 26175 of 2006 Between: P. Mohini Devi w/oK. Chiranjeevi Agraharam Street, Relangi West Godvari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chairman & Managing Director, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC)Ltd., Jeevan Bharathi Tower-II, Connaught Circus, New Delhi. 2 The Director (Personnel), Oil & natrual Gas Corporation (ONGC) ltd. Jeevan Bharathi Tower-II Connaught Circus new Delhi. 3 The Regional Director, SRBC, MMDA Towers, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) Ltd., Egmore, Chennai. 4 The Additional Executive Director, Oil & natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) Ltd., Godavari Bhavan, Base Complex, NH.5 Road, Rajahmundry-533106. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or Direction, more particularly one inthe nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in considering the representations made to them by the petitioner seeking absorption into the regular services ofthe respondent organization inthe light of this Hon'ble high Court's Judgment and order dated 24-09-1998 passed in WP Nos. 13551, 26676, 26677, 26678 and 27747 of1997 and consequently submitted report of the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) Hyderabad as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and against the equity, conscience and natural justice besides vioaltive of Articles 14, 16, 19 and 21 of the Conscience and natural justice besides violative of Articles 14, 16 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to implement the Judgment and order dated 24- 09-1998 passed in WP Nos. 13551, 26676, 26677, 26678 and 27747 of1977 for absorption of the petitioner into their regular services with all back wages etc. from the date of her actual entitlement which was unduly not considered by the respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.SREE RAMA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents : MR.KAKARAVENKATA RAO The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 26175 of 2006 O R D E R: After advancement of elaborate arguments on either side, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition enabling the petitioner to approach the Labour Court and work out her remedies, as available under the law. In view of the same, permission is accorded. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn, leaving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal and work out her remedies, as available under the law. No order as to costs. C.V. RAMULU, J. Date: 17-10-2008. MVB.