1 CP-330-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 330 OF 2010 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 148 OF 2010 Babulal Solanki ... Petitioner vs. M/s. Anil Enterprises & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. R. V.Govilkar, i/b. Sarang S. Avadhye,Advocate, for the petitioner. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 14th October, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that on 22.2.2010, while seeking adjournment in A.O.No.148/2010, the respondent No.25, who is the respondent No.1 in the present petition, had made a statement through Advocate that he would not pursue the application for TDR which was pending with the Corporation. Inspite of that, he pursued the matter and filed an affidavit on 23.3.2010. On request, the matter was adjourned to 17.3.2010. Para 2 of the order shows that Mr. Thorat, Counsel for respondent No.25, had made a statement that respondent No.25 would not pursue the application for TDR which was pending with the Corporation till then. Naturally, it means that the statement was to be in force upto 17.3.2010. There is no material to show that till 17.3.2010, he had 2 CP-330-10.sxw made any application before the Corporation for grant of TDR. Nothing is produced in the Contempt Petition to show that the said statement was continued beyond 17.3.2010. Therefore, there is no material to take action for contempt. Contempt Petition stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)