mw,m,m WW W WWW WWW WW &:3if%rqaw1%¥r hn 10} No. 1217 of 2008 le Mr. Justice Dhitendra Mishral 1. Vs 1. IO Writ Petitic lSingle Bench; Hon’b PETITIONERS KaJ S/( AaJ nlakar Singh, aged about 66 years, ). late Shri Ramugmh Singh, R/o. napara Durg, Tah. 6a Distt. Durg (C.G.) present Axyanagar House No.277, No.13, Durg, Tahsil Distt. Durg, J ev Singh, S/o. Late Darshan Singh, about 56 yéars, R/o. Risali Sector, . 8r. Distt. Durg, at prcscnt Villagc Ii, Tahsil, Dhamdha, Distt. Durg ..‘ - J nluishna Dixit, S/o late Manikchand aged about 55 ysars, R/o. Q.No.16B, Street-8, Sea-1, Bhilai, Tahsil RESPONDENTS Dixit, as Distt., Durg (C.G.) 210 Singh, S/o. Late Bhaiyaram Singh, aged about 67 years, R/o 1079/ 12, Girija Sadan Laxmi Nagar Risali, Bhilai, Tahsil 8n Diett. Durg (C.G.) f ,4 State of Chhattisgarh, through Seofetary, (Administration), D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur we.) Th5 Collector, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Tahsildar, Dhamdha, District —Durg (C.G.) 26.02.2008 Shri Jitendra Gupta, counsel for the. petitioners. Shri V.V.S. Murthy Heard. Dy. A,G. for the State. /77 /V / 4p A. "”ryw, Wm ta 200 Wm (W) / mq Wm 111 200 Wm (W) WWW ammm maféam mmikém &;aifansn%sr The petitionars whc are ax-army 111511 of th€ Indian Army have filed this pcti ion for th€ following reliefs:— “7.1 It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may ki dly be given direction to the responde ts for handing over of aforesaid land which is allotted ih favour of the petition rs. 7,2 Any other re 'ef deemed justified may also kindly be llowed.” The grievance of t e petitioners is that the Sub- Divisional Officer, Burg vide his order dated 1.6.1992 ’made allotment of agri ultural land in favour of the petitioners and other ar y men and as per the order of the Collector and Pre ident, District Sainik Welfare Board, Durg, after allo nt of the land, the petitioners have also paid premi the revenue papers and/‘Patta has also been issued in favour of the petitioners, however, the possession f the allotted land has not been delivered to the petiti 11ers. On application of the petitioners, the Sub—Di isional Officer, Durg vide his memo dated’19.02.2007 irected the Tahsildar, Dhamda to enquire into the mat er as to why the possession of the agricultural land all tted to the petitioners has not been handed over to th m. The Civil Suit filed by one t e n and the allotted land stands u recorded in their names HW,W,W Wm vi 200 mm (W) WWW Wm#&@m mmm WWW $31‘m311éw K.V. Filif was also dismisscd by the learned Additional Civil Judge Class-I, Du rg vide judgment dated 9.12.2004 passed in Civil Suit No.89 A/2003 with an observation that the land in question has already been allotted to the other ex-army men. Despite the above facts, the Revenue Authorities have not de ivered the possession. Shri V.V.S Murth , learned Dy, A.G. appearing for the State submits that this petition may he disposed of with suitable directi n to the concerned Revenue >rAuthoi‘ity for doing th needful in accordance with law within specified period. Having heard 1e rned counsel for the parties, ”' having regard to the pl ading in the petition as also the documents ~annexed ith this petition, the instant petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to make representation before the Collector, Durg/ respondent No.2 raising all the grievances raised in/th‘is petition along with a copy of this order within a period of one month from today. The Collector, Durg after receipt of such representation shall decide the same within a further period of four months in accordance with law. MA irr#-i The petition is accordingly disposed of. /~ m , Sal — 3gim3« Judge , i; D‘mendra M