1 ndm 3 caf.3652.06 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3652 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 10107 OF 2006 Mrs. Yamunabai Ashok Kakad. ... APPLICANT Vs. N. Santhilkumar s/o Natarajan and anr. ... RESPONDENTS -------- Mr. G.S. Hegde i/b M/s. G.S. Hegde and Associate for the Applicant. Mr. S.S. Vidyarthi for Respondent No.2. -------- CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 03 rd August, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant. The application already stands dismissed on account of conditional order as against Respondent No.1. The learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant would pursue the matter only against Respondent No.2. That statement is placed on record. 2 For the reasons mentioned in the application, in our view 2 being sufficient cause and which have remained uncontroverted, the application deserves to be allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) considering the fact that the delay is only of 181 days. Hence, Application is allowed on the above terms. In view of the above, appeal shall proceed only against Respondent No.2, who will be the sole Respondent, for admission. [ A.A. SAYED, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]