IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 26TH JULY 2011 / 4TH SRAVANA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 5559 of 2011() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.626/2011 OF NEDUMANGAD POLICE STATION PETITIONERS/ACCUSED --------------------- 1. RATHEESH, AGED 20 YEARS, S/O.MURUGAN, AZHIKKAKATHU VEEDU, MULLASSERY, KARAKULAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. MAHESH, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.MURUGAN, AZHIKKAKATHU VEEDU, MULLASSERY, KARAKULAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.K.SATHEESH KUMAR SRI.K.S.PRAVEEN RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.MANU THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. --------------------------------------------- Bail Appln.No.5559 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of July, 2011 ORDER This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Petitioners are accused Nos.3 and 4 in Crime No.626 of 2011 of Nedumangad Police Station. 2. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 294(b), 452, 323, 324 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The prosecution case is that on 06/04/2011, the accused persons trespassed into the house of the de facto complainant, attacked his wife and son and destroyed the household articles worth `80,000/-. 4. The allegations levelled against the accused are grave in nature. Investigation is going on. If the petitioners are granted anticipatory bail at this stage, it would adversely affect the proper investigation of the case. In a case of this nature, I do not think it is proper to grant anticipatory bail. For the aforesaid reasons, the Bail Application is dismissed. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE skj