IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30080 of 2011 1.Ram Jinish Roy @ Bijli 2.Jai Narain Roy 3.Ram Kripal Roy @ Ram Brikash Roy, All sons of late Ram Bahadur Roy, resident of village-Birnama Tula, P.S.-Angarghat, District- Samastipur. Versus The State of Bihar ----------- 2. 8.9.2011. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with a case in which cognizance has been taken for the offence punishable under sections 420, 464, 465 and 467 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that the allegation on the face of it is absurd and not believable. The complainant herself has stated that her husband had executed sale deed in April, 2008 for two Bigha and ten Katha of land but the information was not given to the family members. The complainant on enquiry came to know from her husband that he had executed the sale deed but he denied to have received consideration amount. Taking into consideration the nature of allegation, let the petitioners, namely, 1.Ram Jinish Roy @ Bijli, 2.Jai Narain Roy and 3.Ram Kirpal Roy @ Ram Brikash Roy in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/communication of the order be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Dalsingsarai, 2 Samastipur in connection with Complaint Case No.579 of 2010, Tr. No.1697 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Md.S. ( Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)