In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 5709 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: August 10, 2009 Sarwan Singh @ Sarwan Kumar .. Petitioner Vs. Mohinder Singh and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Anju Arora, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Mr. Rajiv Kwatra, Sr. DAG, Haryana with Mr. Gurdial Singh, Tehsildar, Jagadhari. A.N. Jindal, J Tehsildar, Jagadhari has submitted his report dated 4.8.2009, observing that all the trees standing in the middle line of Khasra No.22//30 and 27//3-4 are found to be planted in Khasra No. 22//30 and their roots are also found in the said khasra number. The respondents have not filed the suit qua Khasra No.22//30. Admittedly, this land is not owned by the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that he would not uproot any tree standing in the land of the plaintiff including Khasra No.27//3-4. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the report submitted by the Tehsildar, Jagadhari dated 4.8.2009, this petition is accepted and the order of status quo granted by the Lower Appellate Court is vacated. However, in case the petitioner uproots the trees then he will deposit the sale proceeds in a Nationalised Bank in the shape of FDR, copy of which will be submitted to the trial court. However, this order of mine will not effect the merits of the case. In case the trees are found in the land of respondents, then the petitioner will have to indemnify the respondents for the said trees. August 10, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge