IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2011 / 10TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 17633 of 2011(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.R. VIKRAMAN, CHIRAYATH HOUSE, PAMBOOR, P.O. KUTTUR, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN SMT.R.PADMAKUMARI RESPONDENT: --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR-680001. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. MR. M.R. SABU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 17633 of 2011(D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT FOR THE VEHICLE KL.8/T.8694 DATED 15.06.2010 EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE TIMING ON 7.2.2003. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE PORPOSED TIMING FOR THE VEHICLE KL.8/T.8694. EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 25.2.2011 EXT.P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF IMPLEMENTATION DT.9.2.2011 EXT.P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DTED 18.6.2011. /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No.17633 OF 2011 ......................................................................... Dated this the 1st September , 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers: “1) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writs, order or direction to the respondent, Secretary, Regional Transport Authority,Thrissur to implement Exhibit P4 proceeding dated 25.02.2011, as far as Serial No.6 of it granting variation from Mayannur to Ottappalam and back through the newly opened bridge in respect of the route Chelakkara-Thrissur via Mayannur for the vehicle KL.8/T 8694 by conducting a time conference or otherwise by also considering Exhibit P6 request to grant parity of running time to the petitioner's service, while so implementing, similar to that of other limited stop ordinary service as services are operating with similar category, as two minutes per kilometer rate of running time. 2) grant such other relief as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper. ” W.P.(C) No.17633 OF 2011 2 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's case is appearing against Sl.No.6 of Ext. P4 and that the same is to be implemented, also granting variation of timings, as requested for in Ext. P6. The learned Counsel further submits that necessary variation has been granted by the concerned respondent in respect of all others concerned and the discrimination meted out by the petitioner is sought to be intercepted in this writ petition. 3. Heard the learned Sr. Government Pleader as well. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances, the respondent is directed to give effect to Ext. P4, if the same has become final, also considering the variation of timings as sought for vide Ext.P6. The proceedings shall be finalised, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the respondent for further steps. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk