1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated :Nainital: the 9th day of June, 2010 First Bail Application No. 571 of 2010. Criminal Side Satendra Kumar S/o Sri Indraj R/o Village –Peergarhi Police Station –Titabi District Muzaffarnagar (U.P.) ………..Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …………Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Crime No. 62 of 2010 Under Section: 307 I.P.C. P.S. Kotwali, Manglaur District: Haridwar Hon’ble Prafulla C.Pant,J. Shri Rajendra Singh, Advocate, present for the applicant. Shri Amit Bhatt, A.G.A., present for the State. Applicant-Satendra Kumar who is in jail in connection with crime No. 62 of 2010, relating to offence punishable under section 307 I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali, Manglaur, has sought his release on bail. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Applicant is not named in the first information report. It is pleaded on behalf of the applicant that if the prosecution story of revenge by the applicant, on getting failed to marry Ramesho, is taken to be true, in that case there should have been no difficulty in identifying the applicant at the spot where in the presence of Ramesho applicant is said to have fired the shot. It is also not clear as to why fire was shot at the nephew of the complainant. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant 2 deserves bail. Let the applicant Satendra Kumar be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of like amount to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee. (Prafulla C.Pant,J.) Dt.09.06.2010 Parul