IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 9846 of 2010 Date of Decision: 25.5.2010 Kamal Dev ....Petitioner. Versus The Punjab State Warehousing Corporation and another ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. The prayer made in this writ petition filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to decide the appeal dated 12.5.2005 (Annexure P-7) filed by him against the order dated 7.4.2005 passed by respondent No.1 within the time bound frame. It is not in dispute that against the order dated 7.4.2005, an appeal has been filed by the petitioner before respondent No.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall feel satisfied if a time bound direction is issued to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the appeal filed by him. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the file, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the appeal (Annexure P-7) filed by the petitioner, if not already decided, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. May 25, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE