IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR $§§§§E£E $53 WRIT PETITIOI} 1S) No. 93/2010 Smt. Shanti Kashyap W/o N.P. l Kashyap aged about 63 years retired Lecturer Govt. Higher Secondary School Janjgir, Ressi. Near S.B.I. Vivekanand Marg Janjgir, District— Janjgir— Champa (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS / 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary School Educatioh Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The District Education Officer, District Janjgir— Chama (C.G.) / The Accountant General Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) The principal Government Higher secondary School Janjgir District Janjgir— Champa (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ?“ p HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 509 of2010 PETITIONER : Smt. Shanti Kashyap. I VERSUS RRSPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA S A ' J B: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. . Shri K.S.Pawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri Anand Verma, Advocate for the respondent No. 3. ' ORAL ORDER (Passed on 03$ day of February, 20 10) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is heard fmally. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the case, being payment of retiral benefits matter, may be referred to the pension committee. 2. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal v. The State of Chham'sgarh & Others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted ‘by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh & Others v. Baijnath Mandel and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgnent and order dated 315‘ of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. \\ \ 4642/2004 Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. With the consent ofthe parties, this petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days hom the date of receipt of a copy of the petition hem the petitioner and this order. Thereaiter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the otficers concerned, within a further period of 15 days; The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may tile additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner be. completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. The petitioner shall supply extra copy of the petition to the learned counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding the same to the Committee. sATISH K. AGNIHOTRI Judge ‘5 i Sdl- Amit