Civil Revision No. 7379 of 2010 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7379 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.11.2010 Savita and another .....Petitioner Versus Smt. Sarita Mittal and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Kunal Dawar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present petition is to the order passed by the learned trial Court on 20.8.2010, whereby the plaintiff-petitioners have been called upon to affix the advalorem Court fee on the impugned sale deeds. The sale deeds challenged in the suit are allegedly executed by the petitioners. Therefore, in view of the Hon’ble Supreme Court judgment in Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh v. Randhir Singh and others 2010 (2) RCR (Civil) 564, the petitioners have rightly been called upon to affix the advalorem Court fee. Civil Revision No. 7379 of 2010 (O&M) [2] In view of the above, I do not find any patent illegality or material irregularity in the impugned order passed by the trial Court, which may warrant interference by this Court, in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. [ HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 12.11.2010 ds