1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Second Bail Appl. No. 3662/2006 (Hukmaram vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 24.8.2006 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Amitabh Acharya, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor. This is second bail application. While dismissing the earlier bail application, the petitioner was granted liberty to file a fresh bail application after the statement of Bhudra Ram was recorded by the trial court.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that statement of Bhudra Ram PW.1 has been recorded by the trial court. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor. Carefully gone through the statement of Bhudra Ram PW.1. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that it was the deceased herself, who wished to live separately from her in-laws. The petitioner assured the deceased that after taking the crop, which is jointly cultivated by the petitioner and his parents and other family members, they will be separating from the other family members but before reaping the crop, it is 2 stated that the deceased committed suicide. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merit of the case and taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I consider it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Hukma Ram s/o Salagram be released on bail in FIR No.93/2005, P.S. Chitalwana, Distt. Jalore provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-