IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 16 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 620 OF 2003 SHRI DIAGO SILVEIRA,CALANGUTE GOA. ....Petitioners Versus VILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF CALANGUTE AND ....Respondents 2 ORS., Mr. E. Dias, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P. A. Kamat, advocate for respondent no.1. Coram:- R. M. LODHA, J. Date:- 17th August, 2005 P.C. Heard Mr. Dias, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kamat, learned counsel for the respondent no.1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance od the direction given in the Order dated January 22, 2004. By the order dated January 22, 2004, in Writ Petition No.620 of 2003, the learned Single Judge of this Court remanded the matter back to the Village Panchayat of Calangute for fresh decision in accordance with law, after hearing the parties. The Court directed in its order that the findings of the Village Panchayat should be given within three months from the date of the order. The learned counsel for the respondent no.1 submits that the Village Panchayat after the remand has taken decision and passed resolution. He has not been able to give the exact date of the resolution. This speaks volumes about inaction and laxity on the part of the advocate appearing for respondent no.1 in not even caring to find out the date of the resolution that was passed by the Village Panchayat way back in the year 2004. Be that as it may, now since the resolution has been passed by the Village Panchayat, though beyond the time of three motnhs that was given by this Court in the order dated January 22, 2004, I am satisfied that no further action needs to be taken in this contempt petition and the contempt notice deserves to be discharged. I record the statement made by the learned counsel for respondent no.1 that legible copy of the resolution shall be provided by the respondent no.1 to the petitioner within one week from today. Contempt petition is disposed of. R. M. LODHA, J.