IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.32 OF 2009 Bharat Sudam Salunkhe & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents ­­ Shri Pratap Patil for the Petitioners. Shri P.M. Patil, AGP for State. Shri R.D. Rane for Respondent No.2. ­­ CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J DATED : 5TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C. Prayers made in the petition are vague and primarily relate to a policy decision by the State Government and other authorities concerned which are implementing the scheme. We are of the considered view that this is not a fit case where this Court should exercise its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and that too in a Public Interest Litigation. 2. However, learned Counsel appearing for the State submits that they will examine the matter as well as discuss the same with the implementing authorities and other Respondents and take appropriate decision in accordance with law and the State policy. 3. In view of the statement made by learned Counsel appearing for the State, the petition disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J