IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21499 of 2011 1. Madhusudhan Prasad @ Madhusudan Prasad Gupta 2. Binit Kumar @ Binit Kumar Gupta ------------------------- Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 20.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. I find much fault at the informant’s hand as earlier a case under section 498A IPC was pending having allegation about demand of Motorcycle, Freeze and T.V. After reconciliation she come to her in-laws’ house even then dowry is said being demanded including Rs. 50,000/- more and for section 307 IPC allegation is about her taking to Railway Track after tying her hand. Cancellation was sought also in earlier case in which notice was issued. Refusal order by the Sessions Judge in the circumstance stated above appears non-application of mind on his behalf. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, 2 Bettiah, West Champaran in Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 84/2011. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)