1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.4292/2010 Suryakant Vimalkumar Kale Vs. State of Mah. and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. Karmarkar, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. Kankale, AGP for respondents 1 and 2. CORAM: B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 2nd SEPTEMBER 2010. Heard. Advocate Karmarkar has relied upon the judgment reported in 2007 (4) Mh. L. J. 333 ( Khushal s/o Narayanrao Mundhe Vs. State of Maharashtra and others) to urge that without hearing the petitioner, recovery certificate could not have been issued. Learned AGP points out that in the present matter, certificate is issued under Section 98-B of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act because of award dated 11/12/2009 under Section 96 by the Cooperative Court. It is apparent that procedure under Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Act is not relevant. The petitioner has to challenge the award dated 11.12.2009 before the appropriate forum. With that liberty to the petitioner (if not already challenged) present with petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE Ambulkar.