IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH " “g / 2009 Ram Qilas Agarwal Son of Late Sri Mani Ram Agrawal, Aged about 50 years, Resident of Village Sargaon, Tahsil n ~ Mungeli, District Bilaspur—(C.G.) Purshottam Agarwal, Son of Late Shri Ram Ratan Agarwal, Aged about 47 years, Resident of Village Hirri (Bilha Mode), Tahsil — Bilaspur, District Bilaspur—(C.G.) Biharilal Agarwal Aged about 62 years MahqVceW‘ Prasad Agarwal, Aged about 65 years, Both Son of late Maniram Agarwal, Resident of Village Bilha, Talisil —~ Bilha, Distt. Bilaspur~ (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Acting through ~ Collector, Bilaspur~(C.G.) AT BILASPUR REVIEW m0. Ram», f» ofmggm M Q PETITIONERS : (zWW Vw .. Versus RESPONDENTS : (gr/5% WW _ \ v& MG. W 200 W tram (twww) Emmi-rm $B: HQN. $HRK JUEWICE 1 Lammmg Shri Memoj Paremjix Hsard in chamber. The applicants are a 7-2009 pasged in WP. applicemm’ patitien was r€mitt€ci back to the Tah upon mi: applicatlan iiks 178 of ma CG. Lzmd apportunity Gf healing. to law. On due cansidm‘at WWWHm (v ”£6 fwfr Wart %a€fw {mm MK. A@¢WW£&£¢ :, Adv. for the applicants. eeking mview of the Order dated 15— 227} NO. 2198/2009, whemby m6 partly Eoxmd smd the 111att€r was sildar camcmneci for deciSiOn afresh t1 by the petitionerS unclar Sactian Rmmnma Cam-3 after givizlg full bah £116 pamiES in acccrdailcc with .011 0f the submiSsian of logmwd counscl for the appiicaom arid mo gl‘ouodg‘ taken by the applicants in mviow pe’ition, I do not find any groumi warralitmg roview of tho ordor dated 157-2009 paosed in W.P.(227} No. 2193/2009. The fox/dew potition is therefore, Eiablo to be and ii»: horoby ciismisoed. most”- N.K.Agarwal Judge WW Wm—FS/95—l 1 /2008——1,00,000. ‘gg