IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.16694 of 2011 Dilip Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 4 17-08-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. Petitioner is in jail custody in connection with a case registered under section-307 & other minor sections of the Indian Penal Code as well as 27 of the Arms Act. Petitioner is named in the first information report and there is allegation that he alongwith other accused made indiscriminate firing causing fire arm injury to the informant. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that one co-accused, Keshav Yadav has already granted privilege of bail by this court vide order dated 01.06.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14254 of 2011. It is further contended by him that as a matter of fact, prior to the alleged occurrence, the father of the petitioner had lodged Bakhtiarpur P.S. Case No. 94/09 against the informant of the present case and others and that is the reason of false implication of the petitioner in the present crime. The injury report of informant corroborates this fact that the informant sustained several fire-arm injuries. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, - 2 - prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Bakhtiarpur (Balwahat O.P. ) P.S. Case No. 299 of 2010 stands rejected. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)