IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.30 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1276 OF 2004 Union of India & Anr. )..PETITIONERS Versus Mr. Vishnu Morje, Sole ) representative of Viprasi ) Travels )..RESPONDENT Mr. S.S. Pakale, for the Petitioners Mr. S.P. Kanuga, for the Respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & S.R.SATHE, JJ. F.I. REBELLO & S.R.SATHE, JJ. F.I. REBELLO & S.R.SATHE, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : : : 7th September,2004 P.C.: 1. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The points urged herein were not urged before this Court when the matter was heard for interim relief and order passed. The points now being urged can be considered after affidavits are filed in the main petition at the time of final hearing. Considering the above no interference called for. No error apparent on the face of the record is pointed out. Review petition rejected. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (S.R. SATHE, J.)