-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.316 OF 2004 PETITION NO.316 OF 2004 PETITION NO.316 OF 2004 Ms.Palak D.Shah, Minor through her father D.Shah........... ..Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Maharashtra & Ors....Respondents Mr.M.R.Deshpande,for the Petitioner Mr.A.A. Kumbhakoni, Add. Adv. General with Mr. A.P.Vanarshe, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Ms. Simran Puri, for Respondent NO.6. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. REBELLO F.I. REBELLO F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 25th April,2005 : 25th April,2005 : 25th April,2005 P.C: P.C: P.C: . Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. In the instant case also the Samiti directed admission after the cut-off date i.e. 30th September, 2004. For the view we have taken in Writ Petition No.3212 of 2004 there is no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. 3. However, it is the case of the petitioner that she has filed a complaint to the Dental Council of India. If that be so the Dental Council of India to consider the said complaint and dispose it off according to law considering the observation of the Apex Court in Islamic Academy of Education & Anr. Islamic Academy of Education & Anr. Islamic Academy of Education & Anr. Vs.s.s. State of Karnataka and Ors. (2003) 6 SCC 697. State of Karnataka and Ors. (2003) 6 SCC 697. State of Karnataka and Ors. (2003) 6 SCC 697. (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.) (S.P. (S.P. (S.P. KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.)