^9 Appiicant Accused Resoondent Complainant HSGH COURT OF CHHATTiSOARH AT BILASPUR Cr.M.P. fPRi No.347 of 2011 C^f^P H 7/ Balaram, S/o Jagatram, Casto Satnami, aged about 42 years, SECL, Employee. r/o village Singhra, Tahsii Mafkharauda, DisttJanJgir Champa (C.G.), Presentiy T/O P.S. Chha!, Tahsi! Dharamijaigarh, i P.S. Chhai. Distt.Raigarh (C.G.). Versus Smt.Saroj Devi, W/o Shri ChhedHai Agawal, aged about 40 years, r/o Agrasen Marg, Kharsiya, P.0. Kharsiya, Tahsii Kharsiya, Distt.Raigarh (C.G.) (Petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.) (SB: Hon'bte Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) MrAkhslesh Kumar, couns^i for the appiicant. ORDERfORALi (Passed on 8tn March. 2011) 1. By this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminai Proceeiure, 1973 (for short 'Code'), the applicant has challenged iegality and propriety of the order datsd 31.8.2010 passed by tho Forth Additionai Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Raigarh in Criminal Revision No.115/09. 2. Learned counsei for the applicant seeks to withdraw tiiis peWon wfth libsrty to fiie application for dismissai of complalnt case before the Judlciai Magislrate First Class, Kharssya who has taken cognizance of ths offence commltted within th©territorial jurisdiction of Raigarh and not within the territorial jurisdlction of "^ Kharsiya. 3. Order impugned reveais that as per distribution order passed by ttie Chief JudiciaS Magistrate, Raigarh, tsrritoriai jurisdiction to try the complaint fsSed under Section 138 ofthe Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 reiating to revsnue Disfrict Raigarh lies with the Chief Judicial Magistrats. 4. in these circumstances, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn wSth aforesaid ilberiy. if such application is fiied before th©Judicial Magistmte First Class. Kharsiya, then Judiciai Magistrate First Ciass, Kharsiya shail (iecide f»i© appiacation on its own merit without influence itself by order of the revjsionai Court or by order of this Court. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^'