IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 503 of 2008 (S/S) Anand Ballabh Badhani S/o late Heera Ballabh Badhani R/o Unchakot Mallagaon Post Office Unchakot District Nainital, Uttarakhand. . Petitioner ...………… [ Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary Personnel Dehradun, Uttarakhand. 2. The District Magistrate Nainital, Uttarakhand. 3. The Additional District Magistrate / Nodal Officer, Nainital, Uttarakhand. ...…………. Respondents Mr. Pooran Singh Rawat, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2) By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought, quashing of the public notice given by the Collector, Nainital, whereby the candidates who appeared in examination for Group ‘C’ have been allowed to supply the copies of High School certificates and Intermediate mark sheets by 31st of January 2008. 3) It appears that an examination was got held by Collector, Nainital, for Group ‘C’ posts (Junior Assistants) in the District Nainital for which an advertisement was issued on 17.12.2006. It was required as per advertisement that the copies of the High School certificates and Intermediate mark sheets should be enclosed with the applications. After holding the written examination, it appears that some more than 350 applications were found without the attested copies of the High School certificates and / or Intermediate mark sheets. On this, Collector, Nainital, got published the impugned notice permitting all the candidates to remove the defect. It appears that after the same was done by 31st of January 2008, result was declared as per the memorandum (Annexure –4), and now, the typing tests are going on. At this stage, the petitioner has challenged the notice permitting the candidates to remove the defects in their applications i.e. permitting them to enclose the copies of High School certificates and / or Intermediate mark sheets. Since, the last date provided for removing the defects in said advertisement already appears to have been expired on 31st of January 2008, and thereafter result of written examination has also been declared, this Court, in the circumstances, is not inclined to interfere with the examination process, as the impugned notice does not appear to be discriminatory and the questioned opportunity to remove the defects has been given to all those candidates whose applications were incomplete in respect of the aforesaid requirement. 4) Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily. (Interim Relief Application No. 3961 of 2008 also stands dismissed, accordingly). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) [ Dt. July 01, 2008. H.Negi