Crl. Misc No. M 11094 OF 2011 ****** Harjit Singh vs State of Punjab Present : Mr. N.S.Swaitch, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Chandumajra, DAG Punjab ******* The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.54, dated 12.3.2011, registered under Sections 13-A/3/67 of the Punjab Gambling Act, 1867, and Sections 420/120-B of the IPC, at Police Station City Khanna, Police District Khanna. On 11.4.2011, the following contention was noticed :- “ Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the petitioner nor he was caught at the spot.” Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from SI Jaspreet Singh, states that actually as per the record, both the cell phones belong to the petitioner. However, counsel for the petitioner states that only one cell phone belongs to the petitioner. Be that as it may, in my opinion, the present is a case where the petitioner should be granted the concession of anticipatory bail. Of-course, if he is found guilty, he would be liable to suffer whatever punishment is meted out to him. Consequently, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 28.4.2011 between 11 am to 4 pm for interrogation and in the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail by the Investigating Officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) April 21, 2011. JUDGE `kk'