IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC (T) No.: 11 of 2008. Decided on: 24.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ Rewa Shankar Kaushik. … Petitioner. Versus S.S. Parmar. … Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Narender Thakur Advocate vice Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. Narender Thakur, Advocate appearing vice Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous with the passage of time. Consequently, the same is dismissed as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 24, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?