ssm ssm ssm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5150 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 5150 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 5150 OF 2007 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.19431 OF 2007 APPEAL (ST) NO.19431 OF 2007 APPEAL (ST) NO.19431 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.Karale i/by Mr.Umesh Mankapure for the Applicant. Shri Vikas Mali for Respondent No.1. Mr. Satish Kumbhar for Respondent No.3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 29th April, 2008 : 29th April, 2008 : 29th April, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . This is an application for condonation of delay in a matter against the judgment and award passed by the Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sangli. The vehicle was not insured. The Applicant was at the relevant time hiring the vehicle and the original claimant was the pillion rider. There is no appeal filed by the owner. ( 2 ) 2. Considering the averments made in the Civil Application, I am of the view that the sufficient case is made out by the Applicant to condone the delay. The Civil Application is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). 3. Appeal be listed for admission after due registration. 4. The Civil Application is disposed of, accordingly. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]