IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 104 of 2010 Ravindra Prasad ……… Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and another .………. Respondents. Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.P. Joshi, Advocate for the respondents. Date of Judgment: 15.06.2010 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for sometime, states, that the petitioner will be satisfied if the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 1, i.e. the Secretary, Minor Irrigation, Government of Uttarakhand, to take a decision on the two representations preferred by the petitioner dated 17.06.2009 and 21.10.2009 (Annexures 11 and 12 respectively with the writ petition). 2. Learned counsel for the respondents states, that he has no objection to the disposal of the instant writ petition in terms of the modified prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 1, i.e. the Secretary, Minor Irrigation, Government of Uttarakhand, to take a final decision on the two representations made by the petitioner on 17.06.2009 and 21.10.2009 (Annexures 11 and 12 respectively with the writ petition) by passing a well-reasoned speaking order within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the instant order. 4. The instant writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Dasti on payment of usual charges. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 15.06.2010 15.06.2010 Amit