IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16007 of 2009 UMASHANKAR SINGH,son of late Ramanand Singh,resident of village-Saraiya Gopal, P.S.-Patahi,Dist.-East Champaran. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05/ 25-08-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned counsel for the State. In the FIR petitioner along with others has specifically been alleged for firing which proved fatal also. Involvement of the petitioner has been doubted on the ground that there was no cause to kill the deceased and further matter was investigated by the C.I.D. at later stage in which petitioner’s involvement was not found true but FIR shows the reason for killing i.e. he was opposing the misdeed in development work by the present Mukhiya, who only succeeded to be elected in the present election. As about investigation by the C.I.D., a report was called for from the Superintendent of Police, East Champaran, Motihari, which has been received, from which it appears that in fact there was no investigation by the C.I.D., rather such enquiry was sought by the then Superintendent of Police. I doubt basing the same as part of the investigation if prosecution case can be doubted at the stage. So, finding specific allegation I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this petition for anticipatory bail is rejected. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )