// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8517/2008 Lal Chand S/o Shri Chandaji Teli Versus Additional District & Sessions Judge 9Fast Track) No.2, Beawar, District Ajmer and Another Date of Order ::: 27.08.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Rajdev Tripathi, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for dispossession against the defendant- petitioner after terminating his tenancy by serving a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act. During the pendency of that suit, the defendant-petitioner filed an application for determination of rent provisionally. The trial court rejected the application vide order dated 17th April, 2008 on the ground that the present suit has been filed under the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, wherein there is no provision for determination of provisional rent. The said order is under challenge in this writ petition // 2 // preferred on behalf of the defendant- petitioner. I have examined the impugned order passed by the trial court in the light of submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner and, after considering the same, I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in the said order so as to interfere with the same under Article 227 of the Constitution. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//