IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 11638 of 2008. Decided on: 06.04.2011. ___________________________________________ Bhikham Ram. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. R.D. Kaundal, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous with the passage of time. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. April 06, 2011. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?