FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6380 OF 2011 "Godavari Shikshan Sanstha, Dhangar Takli, Taluka Purna Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. S.V. Mundhe, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. V.H. Dighe,Assistant Govt. Pleader for respondent No.1 to 3. Mr. S.K. Shinde, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 19th SEPTEMBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] By way of present petition, the petitioner is challenging the decision of the State Government in permitting the respondent No.4 school to be transferred at Dhangar Takli, where the petitioner school is running. 2] Perusal of the comparative chart would reveal that there is no much reduction in the school of the petitioner. It further be seen that the Gram Panchayat of both the villages have also given no objection for the same. It is further to be noted that the respondent No.4 is running the school on no-grant- in-aid basis. Apart from that, we find that if there is sufficient strength to cater both the schools, having 2 schools rather than one, would be in the better interest of the students, inasmuch as, FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6380 OF 2011 "Godavari Shikshan Sanstha, Dhangar Takli, Taluka Purna Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 both the schools would strive for their betterment so as to attract more number of students. 3] In that view of the matter, no interference is called for. The writ petition is rejected. [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-