Review Application No.518 of 1993 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Review Application No.518 of 1993 in CWP No.8075 of 1988 Date of decision: 05.09.2011 Sukhdev Singh and others ..Applicant Versus The State of Punjab and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK. Present:- Ms. Alka Chatrath, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr.Puneet Gupta, Addl. A.G., Punjab, for the respondent(s)-applicant(s). HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The petitioners were appointed Teachers on ad hoc basis prior to 19.02.1979. The petitioners claim benefit of higher pay scale on acquiring higher qualifications in terms of circular dated 23.07.1957. The said writ petition was allowed by this court vide order dated 01.08.1989. The present review application has been filed pointing out that only those Teachers appointed on regular basis and who acquire higher qualifications prior to 19.02.1979, are entitled to advance increments and not the Teachers appointed on ad hoc basis. Learned counsel for petitioners has referred to the Division Bench judgments of this Court. In Hari Krishan Mayer and others versus State of Punjab and another, (CWP No.16447 of 1996 decided on 23.01.1998) and Promila Aggarwal versus State of Punjab and others, (CWP No.3193 of 1998 decided on 23.02.2000), wherein the grant of additional increments to those Teachers who were appointed on ad hoc Review Application No.518 of 1993 ::2:: basis prior to 19.02.1979 has been upheld. In view of the said fact, we do not find any error apparent on the record which may warrant review of the impugned order. Dismissed. Learned counsel for the applicants pointed out that identical review application No.87 of 1989 in CWP No.2923 of 1986 is also pending decision. The office is directed to list the same on 09.09.2011. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE (VIJENDER SINGH MALIK) JUDGE September 05, 2011 Sukhpreet