-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.137 OF 2008 Rajesh S.Prajapati .. Appellant. Vs. Sunita Rajesh Prajapati .. Respondent. Mr.A.K.Saxena for the appellant. Mr.B.V.Bhukhari for the respondent. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. DATED : 21ST JULY, 2008. DATED : 21ST JULY, 2008. DATED : 21ST JULY, 2008. PC: PC: PC: . Heard learned counsel for the respective spouses. 2. The respondent-wife had filed Petition No.A-1981 of 2004 which has been allowed and the marriage between the parties has been dissolved by the Family Court and hence this appeal by the husband. The challenge to dissolution of marriage is not seriously contested by learned counsel for the parties and in any case during pendency of the appeal, the respondent-wife has already re-married. The parties, therefore, negotiated for an amicable settlment. The consent terms have been placed before us and it is signed by both the spouses alongwith the respective advocates. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The parties have agreed to withdraw all the allegations made against each other in different proceedings and to withdraw the said allegations/proceedings before the -2- compentent forum/court. 3. The parties are present before us and they state that the settlement between them has been by consent and they are satisfied with its terms. They prayed for disposal of the appeal in terms of the consent terms. Hence ordered accordingly. Decree be drawn in terms of the consent terms. Costs in cause. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)