r IN THE HXGH COUBT GF JUD' PETITIONER :A RE3PONDB3TS! • -- '^A fe? <0 i{ ^ i pi ^x^./^ ^X^j^ yg^ %BIT. PETITI ON NO».^LY OF 1996 MAI^IKCHAND TAT-^HAKm, Ag^ed about 53 years, s7o Shri Keshav Pd^ Tararaksr, OcOupationiTransport Businass» Resident of - Chandan Lodge, Post^anendragarh^ District " Sarguja,(?/t.F») $ V E R 3 U 3 S 1 Staie of Madhya Pradesh, Through the S@cretary» Home Departmentr Govt. of Madhya Pradesh, BMOPAL. 2 3 4 •s 7$ 8 9 The Inspector Qeneral of Police> Police Head Quarters. BHOPAL The Superintendent of police,, District-Surguja,(MP) The/Shri 3»F*3- Cn6uhan> S.D*Q*P-%anendragarh» District-Surguj a, (S1P) 3hri B, Rajan, S-fcation HOuse Officer, Police Station^Manendragarht Distt, Surguja,( 5 Shri A. tio Kban>; Sub-Enspecfcor Police 3tation-Manendragaih, District-SyrQuj-a, ( ) Shri &a(Bdeo Singh? Constable. Police Siation-ManendraQarht District-Surguj a;(?W) Shrl Jaroal j^an, Constsble, PS-Mandndragarh, Disit.'SurguJ a;-; Shri Devcrarayan-Constable Police-Station"-Manendragarh> District Surguja, (MP) P5TITION_l2®ER,MTICLE_2_2,6 OF^^^^^^TO^^^ OF IhDIA- XI-HC-22 3TT^T^T f^TW^n^T 5b^ich^TfN' Barve^ 3^ r<<l^l<rt^, ^Tfl<M^l^, [s)diy^< 3ll^l^51®h , »11*1MIiih*1icb ''t7^'"' ' ''"'" ^/^ 2®0- 3n^T?^rr^K^f?cf 9-8-2QOS When the matter is caltec none present on behalf of petttioner. made. No representatto out, the >h is Shri Sandeep Dubey/ Advocate for ttie State/respon No.lto3. Perusal of the order dated 26-3-97 shows that befoile the High Court of Madhya Prade^h at Jabalpur none was appearing f< petttioner. It seems that the r|iatter was regarding quashmenl) of Ishtagasa No.3/96 fited under S^cUon 403 of the I.P.C. By the pass^ge of time this matter has lost ite ®<ist:ence. The petftlon is dismiss^d for non-prosecutton, _ chl^fd4)rl ^l^<rlT^:f^F|'^R^K ^3:rf^T3TT^T povt. y^its ihe^ rthe Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (^y^)