^m ,r- 1 ..h IN THE HIGH COURT OR CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR JVLC.C.NO.-: 2010 (Arising out of order 16.02.2010 pa^sed by Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra dismissing the S.A.No.286/1991) APPLICANTS/ APPELLANTS/ PLAINTIFFS ^. ^"': t.-» A^^ ^•K^^ .....-^5>' ;^^" '>• RESPONDENTS/ DEFENDANTS 1. Mst. Ghasnin Bai (dead), W/o Amrit Lal Teli, Aged about 46 years. 2. Mst. Pilokoma D/o Amrit Lal Teli, ^v Aged about 22 years. 3. Judhishti S/o Amritlal Teli, Aged about 22 years. 4. Babulal, S/o Amritlal Teli, aged about 16years, 5. Ku. Triveni, D/o Amritlal, Aged 11 years; 6. Shatrughan, S/o Amritlal, Aged 5 years; No. 4 to 6 Through Bali Mata Ghasnin ^aLjwdfe^Amritlal, R/o Byn^T^ & District. Raigirh-('MPj Note: Ghasnin Bai has died, but as in the cause title of second appeal, her name is mentioned, therefore, the same is mentioned in the present application also. VERSUS 1. Mani Chandra S/o Sunderlal Teli, Aged about 17 years, 2. Basant Lal, S/o Sunderlal Teli, Aged about 14 years. No.1 & 2 Through Bali Pita Sunderlal S/o Munoo Teli, Aged 47 years, R/o Bunga Tahsil & Distt. Raigarh. 3. Badkoo, S/o Karam Singh Teli, aged 51 yrs. 4(a) Smt. Rambati Bai, Aged about 65 years, Wd/o Kuswa. 4(b) Rupai Bai, D/o Kuswa, Aged about 40 years. 4(c) Goverdhan, Aged about 45 years, S/o Kuswa. r All R/o Ward No.32, Heera Nagar (Mitthu Muda), Sub Post Office, Jute Mill, Raigarh (MP) 496 004. APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF SECOND APPEAL N0.286/1991 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION ON 16.02.2010 3??T^T ^?T Rl-lJcb ^W^TT^T'^RNr ^ro^fftKtSj^ CC .^' '3^E[ "4i^i<ri<4, ^Tii'(-i<i<o, [si^t^y l^fc (/?/U 7^?A ^-•""•"•""""•"""-•"•••••"••"•"•""^200 3H^?T '(T5RT (lclt^<^r) ^wlW^tt"^ ^T^ SB: Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kulnar Mishra, J. 30.06.2010 Shri Adhiraj Surana, coun^el Leamed counsel for the aylpUcants to 6 were aged about 16,11 and $ .at^^: surt was tiled orappcala m e\ for the applicants. submits Ifaat applicant No.4 years respectively at the time when 1991 when second appeal was filed, therefore by now they have becatjie major. In view ofthis statement, (^f&ce Leamed counsel for the affidavit and vakalataama in sup^ort ofthe Leamed counsel for the a{|plicants restoration. On due consideration a^ restoration application MCC (PR] The Second Appeal No.^ number. ^Tqf^ft^ "HR^ ^ fe^ TM^-K ^^^^Tit^ 4ffice objection No.l is over mled. ajpplicants submits that he has filed restoration application. ^plicants is heard on the question of kd for the reasons mentioned in 1788/10 is aUowed. .^86/91 is restored to its original Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge B