IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1803 of 2008 MAHESH TIWARY @ MAHENDRA NATH TIWARY Versus DEVENDRA NATH TRIVEDI & ORS ----------- 2 24.10.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, the impugned order does not in any way prejudice the petitioner inasmuch as the petitioner who was defendant No.2 was removed from the zone of consideration of the suit at the instance of the plaintiff-opposite party. It was plaintiff’s suit and if he did not proceed against the petitioner who was defendant No.2, the same could not be forced upon him. It, however, goes without saying that the adverse consequence if any, on account of deleting the name of the petitioner (defendant No.2 in the suit) will have to be faced by the plaintiff himself. With the aforementioned observations and directions this Civil Revision application is dismissed. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)