^) ^l^ ^ ^ IILTHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) N0. L?^<T ^ /2010(S.B.) PETITIONER Narayan Prasad Sahu S/o Shri Tij Ram Sahu, aged about 45 years, working as Assistant ^••v^""\....-c Grade-III, Govt. Higher ^•^.•..v^:^--" \^wf'^.\y ^•caot">< RESPONDENTS / Grade-III, Govt. Higher Secondary School Sarakhon, Distt.- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) -2. The District Education Officer Janjgir, Distt.- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE L CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ,^^:^^ ^A. ^•.s^^ i i ^S^^^i^ h ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (S) N0.8874 OF 2010 Petitioners Narayan Prasad Sahu Versus Respondents State of Ghhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Risht RahuJ Soni, Advocate forthe petitioner. Ms. SmitaGhai, Panel Lawyer forthe State/ respondents. ashok ORDER(ORAU (Passed on 29th day df November, 2010) 1. Heard learned counsel appearing fpr the parties. 2. Grievance of the petitioner, as set out in the petition is that after petitioner was given regular ^ppointment against regular post in the department, he isentitled to benefit of payprotection as provided in governmentcirculardated 25-10-2002 (Annexure P-5), wherein under Clause (3), it has been provicled that in the matter of fixation of initial pay upon regular appojntment, the services rendered as contingency/work charged employee shall betaken into consideration. Learned counsel for the petjtjoner further submits that the petittoner along with other similarly situated employees preferred representation to the respondent No.2-District Education Officer in this regard vide Annexure P-7, which has not been decided till date. 3. Taking into consideration the nature of grievance involved, the respondent No.2-District Education Officer is dfrected to consider and take appropriate decisiQn on petitioner's representation, inaccordance with law, within a reasonableperiod. In case, the petitioner continues to be aggrieved, it would be open for the petitioner to take recourse to such remedy as may be availableto him underthe law. 4. Wrth the aforesaid direction, the petition is finally disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge