1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application No. 2291/2010 in Writ Petition No. 3256/2007(D) Bharat Kandhari ..vs.. Union of India and ors. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Naik, Amicus Curiae for petitioner-non applicant. Ms. Tajvar Khan, Special Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Bhoyar, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 3 and 4. Mr. A. Parchure, Advocate for respondent no.14-applicant. Mr. Harode, Advocate for respondent no.28-applicant. CORAM:- S. A. BOBDE & A. B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED:- OCTOBER 1, 2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The only reason stated by learned counsel for the applicant for modification of the judgment and order dated 23.06.2010 is the assumption that this Court has directed the respondents to consider the discrepancies in the prices of only those drugs, which are set out in the order. This is totally erroneous assumption since this Court has not limited scope of the enquiry only to those drugs. This Court has specified those drugs in the order since those are the drugs in 2 respect of which averments are made in the petition. The respondents are, certainly, free to go into the discrepancies in respect of any other drugs also. With these observations, the application stands disposed of. Civil Application No. 2395/2010 In view of the order passed in Civil Application No. 2291/2010, the present application is rejected. Authenticated copy of the order be supplied to the learned counsel for the parties. JUDGE JUDGE kahale