THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY M.A.C.M.A.M.P.No.935 of 2011 in M.A.C.M.A.(sr) No.33490 of 2008 and M.A.C.M.A.No.2472 of 2009 COMMON JUDGMENT: These two appeals arise out of a judgment and decree dated 23.11.2007 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum- District Judge, Nizamabad, in O.P.No.31 of 2006. The O.P. was filed claiming compensation of Rs.10 lakhs, on account of the death of late Tiperishetty Gangadhar, in an accident that occurred on 04.10.2005, involving a vehicle owned by the 1st respondent therein and insured with the 2nd respondent, the Insurance Company. The Tribunal awarded Rs.8,15,680/- and apportioned the same among the claimants. While the claimants in M.A.C.M.A.No.2472 of 2009 are seeking enhancement, the Insurance Company filed M.A.C.M.A.(sr) No.33490 of 2008, challenging the compensation awarded by the Tribunal. The claimants as well as the Insurance Company filed M.A.C.M.A.M.P.No.935 of 2011 with a prayer to record the compromise. According to the terms of compromise, the claimants have agreed to receive a sum of Rs.9,75,270/- in full satisfaction of their claim in the O.P. and the Insurance Company has agreed to pay the said amount. Claimants 1 to 3 are present and the 4th claimant, the mother of the deceased, is said to have died on 30.03.2011. Claimants 1 to 3 have appeared and stated that the memorandum of compromise represents the terms agreed to by them. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, both the appeals are disposed of, in terms of the compromise entered into by the parties. The claim in the O.P. shall be restricted to Rs.9,75,270/-, inclusive of interest and costs, both past and future. In view of the death of the 4th claimant, the Tribunal shall re-determine the shares of claimants 1 to 3, permitting the L.Rs. of the deceased-4th respondent to be brought on record. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.11.04.2011. GJ