1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of | coram, appearance, court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders | WRIT PETITION NO.2152/2010 Shivkanta Gharole V/s Madhukar Shinde & Ors ... Shri R.B.Deshmukh,Adv.for petitioner. .... CORAM : A.A.SAYED,J. DATE : 25/11/2010. 1] The above petition takes exception to the order dated 13/11/2009 passed by District Judge-I, Latur by which order, the application of the petitioner/appellant for amendment to the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of Civil Procedure Code came to be rejected. 2] The amendment was sought on the ground that inadvertently the petitioner/orig.plaintiff has valued the suit for Rs.1,77,000/- for the purposes of pecuniary jurisdiction and Court fees, instead of Rs.2,01,153/- and therefore, the amendment was necessitated. 2 3] It is noticed that the amendment which is sought is in the appeal. The suit has already been decided finally. 4] There is no satisfactory explanation as to why the said amendment was not sought before the suit was decided. On pertinent query as to what prejudice is going to be caused to the appellant if the amendment is not granted, the learned counsel fairly conceded that no prejudice as such is going to caused the petitioner. 5] I have gone through the impugned order. The appellate Court has by the impugned order rejected the application for amendment by a well reasoned order and I see no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order. The impugned order is unexceptionable and does not call for any interference at the hands of this Court. 6] In the circumstances, Writ Petition is dismissed summarily. No order as to costs. (A.A.SAYED,J.) umg/wp2152-10 3