IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2249 of 2010 PAPPU SINGH SON OF LATE MANSOOK SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 3.2.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 387, 506 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The first information report speaks of the occurrence having been committed at the instance of the petitioner and one co-accused Sudhir Singh on account of the fact that they had previously murdered the brother of the informant, for which co- accused Sudhir Singh was in jail. Co-accused Sudhir Singh and the petitioner were constantly threatening the informant to part with a certain amount of money and compromise the matter. On the date of occurrence two miscreants were caught by the informant and others, who disclosed that they had threatened the informant at the instance of the petitioner and co-accused Sudhir Singh. Considering the seriousness of the nature of offence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )