IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.4715 of 2009. Decided on: 13th May, 2010. Ramesh Kumar. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Lovneesh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure P-2, order of transfer. It is submitted that the transfer order with regard to the 3rd respondent has already taken effect. Respondent No.3 has already joined duty. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not so far been relieved. It is apparently so in view of the interim order dated 18.12.2009 passed by this Court. Be that as it may. In the reply filed by the Chief Conservator of Forests, it is pointed out that the petitioner has completed around two years of service at the present station and that the transfer is required in the exigency of service. According to the petitioner, the transfer has caused severe hardships to him. If there is any 2 difficulty, he may point out all such grievances before the second respondent in which case the second respondent will consider the matter and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. In the event of the petitioner filing a representation, as above, within a period of one week from today, orders, as above, shall be passed in another two weeks and till such time, the petitioner may not be compelled to join at the transferred station. The petitioner is disposed of, so also the pending applications. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 13th May, 2010 ( Justice Deepak Gupta ), (tr) Judge.