IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8447 of 2010 Gulten Yadav S/O Sri Kartik Yadav R/O Vill.- Chiraiyadih, P.S.- Belhar, Distt.- Banka Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Collector, Banka 3. Deputy Development Commissioner, Banka 4. Block Development Officer Belhar Block, Distt.- Banka 5. Junior Engineer, Belhar Block, Distt.- Banka 6. Block Labour Officer Belhar Block, Distt.- Banka 7. Prahlad Sah S/O Father Name Not Known To The Petitioner Mukhiya, Lorihya Panchayat, Under Belhar Block, Distt.- Banka 8. Dinesh Mandal S/O Father Name Not Known To The Petitioner Panchayat-Secretary, Lorihya Panchayat Under Belhar Block, Distt.- Banka 9. Sadanand Yadav S/O Father Name Not Known To The Petitioner The Then Mukhiya, Lorihya Panchayat, Under Belhar Block, Distt.- Banka 10. Gurieshwar Yadav S/O Father Name Not Known To The Petitioner The Then Panchayat Secretary, Lorihya Panchayat, Under Belhar Block, Distt.- Banka ---------------------------------- 02. 18.11.2011 Mr. Rajiv Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Assisting counsel to G.P. 4 for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the irregularities committed by the Ex- Mukhiya of the Lorihya Panchayat under the district of Banka and the then Panchayat Secretary in the matter of construction of a well. Learned counsel, with reference to an enquiry conducted by the Labour Enforcement Officer, Belhar placed at Annexure-3 as also the letter of the Junior Engineer, Belhar placed at Annexure-5, submits that a bare perusal thereof manifests that some irregularity has been committed in the matter of construction of well which is yet incomplete although substantial public money has been spent for 2 construction thereof. He thus submits that even while the local authorities had attempted to construct a well, the object has not yet been achieved and the money has been wasted. It is contended that his representation to the District Magistrate, Banka placed at Annexure-4 filed in this regard, has remained pending forcing the petitioner to maintain the writ petition. Considering the grievance raised by the petitioner and the fact that the petitioner raises issue of wastage of public money spent on construction of the well which according to the petitioner yet remains incomplete, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievance by filing a fresh detailed representation before the respondent-Collector, Banka and who shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)