1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6347 OF 2009 Sau. Indubai w/o Bhalerao Patil, Age: 42 years, Occ: Household, R/o. Toli, Tq. Parola District Jalgaon. .. Petitioner Versus The Tahsildar, Parola & Others. .. Respondents ... Mr. H.U. Dhage, Advocate holding for Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. D.R. Kale, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr. A.S. Sawant, Advocate for Resp.Nos. 4 to 10. ... CORAM : K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2009. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 4 to 10. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the 2 Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the order dated 17-08-2009 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Nashik Division, Nashik in Grampanchayat Appeal No. 46/2009. 3. The petitioner filed a Dispute dated 31-03-2009 challenging the validity of No Confidence Motion passed in special meeting dated 25-03-2009 against her. Said Dispute NO. 16/2009 came to be rejected by order dated 22-05-2009 passed by Additional Collector, Jalgaon. Against the said order, the petitioner preferred Grampanchayat Appeal NO. 46/2009 under Section 35 (3)(c) of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958. Appeal also dismissed by the appellate authority. 4. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 4 to 10 states that in the meanwhile, elections are held and new body has already taken charge on 10-09-2009. In view of these facts, nothing survives in the present 3 Writ Petition and same is dismissed summarily. [ K.K. TATED, J.] sut/SEP09/wp6347.09