$§ng§€g @wah IN THE HON’BLE HIGH GOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAspUR (c.G_.1 (w.p. (Art—227) No. ..<.9.x\.§f%.../2o111 PET§TIONER : PLANTIFF W/o. R. S. Vaidya; Aged About — 52 Year; R/o — In front of J. J. Hospital and Bhoot Bangla, In side of Dr. Ambedakar School Torva Bilaspur; Tahsil and District — Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS : DEFIENDANTS 1. Smt. J. Vaidya (Joan Vaidya) vShri Vishvanath Ghosh S/o — Shri Sachin Mohan Ghosh; aged about — 55 year; R/o — Near of Torva Primary School; Torva Bilaspur; Tahsil and District — Bilaspur (C.G.) Union of India Through : Genenar Manager South Eastern Central Railway] Bilaspur; Tahsil and District — Bilaspur (C.G.) % 6’“ v E R s U§ ,d.,¥, ;, y. ww Mm mm" ”m“ [a WRITMN PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P. (Art-227) No. 2152/2011 PETITIONER : Smt. J. Vaidya (Joan Vaidya) PLAINTIFF W/o RS. Vaidya Aged About 52 Year; R/o In front ofJ. J. Hospital ‘ and Bhoot Bangla, In side of Dr. Ambedakar School Torva Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.). RESPONDENTS 1. Shri Vishvanath Ghosh S/o Shri DEFENDANTS Sachin Mohan Ghosh aged about 55 yoar; R/o Near of ’I‘orva Primary School; Torva Bilaspur Tahsil and District Bilaspur (0G,), 2. Union of India Through Genenar Manager South Eastern Central Railway] Bilaspur; Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.). i» ‘WRIT PETITION UNDER- ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Hor'lR‘ble Mr. ’I‘.P.Sharma, J.) VERSUS Present:— Shri Vinit Kumar Pandey, Advocate with Shri Sumit Jhanwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Abliishek Sinha, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. Shri Prafull N. Bharat, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. ORDER (Passed on 07/09/201 1) ,._ By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia petitioner has challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 1/3/2011 passed by 3m Civil Judge Class-ll, Bilaspur (C.Gl) in civil suit No. 67—A/2009. J 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to file separate detail application describing suit property by measurement to identify in accordance with Order 7 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Prayer allowed. Consequently, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid libertyi No order as to costs. 5. LA. No. 01 stands disposed of. Sd/— T.P. Sharma Judge ¢//