t j -w ^> •;,-...'''<" A^ ^s^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (2271 N0. 3950 OF 2011 PBTITIONBR Non ApBlicant No. 3 VERSUS RBSPONDENTS Aoplicaats s» Non-AppUcants 4. 7. Prathnuk Chhattisgarh Sahkari Samiti Maiyadit, Through -President Rajesh ehandrakar Ward No. 5 Gaaeshpara, B^bahara, Distt. Mahasam.uad (CG). Machhua Samuh Ward No. 15 Bagbahara, Through Prcsident, Gopal Soiiwani, R/o Ward No. 15 Rawanbhatha, Tahsil Bagbahara, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.). Machhua Sarauli Ward No. 06 B^bahara, Through President Mithlesh Sahu, R/o Waid No. 06 Lalpur, TahsU B^bahara, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.). Machliua Vyakti Ward No. 09 Achanakpara, Through Ashok Kumar S/o Dewarchaad Gaada, R/o Vard No. 09 Achaaakpara, Tahsil Be^bahara, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.). President, Na^ax Panchayat, B^bahara, Distt. Mahasainuad (C.G.). Chief Municipal OfBcer, Nagar Paachayat, Bagbahara, Distt. Maliasainuiid (C.G.). Deputy Director, Matasyaudhog (Fisheries) Mahasaiaund, Distt. Mahasainuad (C.G.). The CoUector, Mahasamund Distt. Mahasainund (C.G.). WRIT^ETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE ^27 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Hoa'Ue Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:-Ms. Indira Tripathi, Advocate with Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, P. L. for the State. ORAL-QRDER (Passedon 22/07/2011) 1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitation of India petitioner has challenged the legaUty and propriety of fhe order dated 28/6/2011 passed by CoUector Mahasamund (C.G.) ia reveuue case No./08/B-121 year 2010-11. '^i. i.l!N^®8& a:li» ms-a&w<?^ "•»»a:-asa ^ ^) After soiue argunient, learaed counsel for the petitkiner subaiits that she seeks to wifhdraw this petition with Uberly to approach before the CoUector i.e. Authorily in terms of proviso to subsection 3 of Section 308 of C.G. Muiucipatities Act, 1961 on the gFOuad that before passing such order prejudicial to the petitioner no opportunily ofhearing has been provided to fhe petitioner. Proviso to subsection 3 of Section 308 of the C.G. MimicipaUties Act, 1961 is sine-qua-non before passiug any order prcjudicial to fhe parties by the appeUate authority. Consequently, petitiou te disiaissed as withdrawn. with aforesaid liberty. Certi&ed copy of the order impugned be retumed to fhe leamed counsel for fhe petitioner after duly subinission of the photostatted copy offhe saiae. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge I-