IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2008 / 4TH ASHADHA 1930 W.P.(C).No. 10744 of 2008 (D) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- R.RAJESH, S/O. RAMADASAN, RAJESH BHAVANAM, CHARUMOODU P.O., MAVELIKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.G. PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA. 3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PATHANAMTHITTA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 4. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KSRTC., ALAPPUZHA. 5. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SMT. K.R. DEEPA ADV. SRI. K. PRABHAKARAN, SC FOR KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 10744 OF 2008- D ==================== Dated this the 25th day of June, 2008 J U D G M E N T An application was made by the petitioner for variation of his permit. Though that was granted by the RTA, concurrence was declined by RTA, Alappuzha by Ext.P3. The revision filed against Ext.P3 was dismissed by Ext.P5. It is challenging Exts. P3 and P5 this writ petition is filed. 2. Though on merits, the petitioner raised several contentions, at the time when the writ petition was taken up for admission, all that is sought for by the petitioner is to permit him to make a modified proposal for the consideration of the RTA. Petitioner is also referring to Ext.P6 judgment where a similar request was granted by this court. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing that it will be open to the petitioner to make a modified proposal before the RTA avoiding the routes covered by the notifications dated 9/5/2007 or 6/5/2008. It is directed that once such an application is made to the 3rd respondent, that will be considered by him and appropriate orders will be passed. To enable the 3rd respondent to consider such application, Exts. P3 and P5 will stand quashed. The petitioner shall make the modified WPC 10744/08 :2 : proposal, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks from today. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp