IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30190 of 2011 Randhir Kumar, son of Babu Saheb Prasad @ Umesh Prasad, resident of Mohalla – Chandmari Motihari, East of M.S. College Gate, P.S. Motihari Town, District – East Champaran. ------- Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Madhu Kumari, D/o – Adalat Prasad, resident of village – Noniya Tiwari Tola, P.S. – Paharpur, Distt. – East Champaran. -------- Opposite Parties. ******* 02. 29.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 2426/2010 for offences under Sections 498(A)/323/504/379 of the Indian Penal Code, is one of the named accused in this case being husband of the complainant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. Submission is that petitioner intends to resume and continue matrimonial relationship with the complainant who is one and only wife, such intention got positive response from complainant opposite party no. 2 through her lawyer. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of filing an application by the petitioner stating such intention/joint petition for compromise duly signed by the parties, and in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above- named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Complaint Case No. 2426/2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition is that (1) In the event of filing independent application and getting positive response or joint petition of compromise, the court below shall permit the parties to lead conjugal life in company of each other and to report personally for a reasonable period on the date fixed for the purposes to the court and on being satisfied of their conduct court below shall pass appropriate order in accordance with law. (2) To attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)