IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.409 of 2009 SHATRUGHAN PRASAD PANDEY SON OF SRI UMAKANT PANDEY, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA BAGMATI SITACHOWK, HAJIPUR, P.S. HAJIPUR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, VAISHALI ----------- 5 20.01.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the State submits that on perusal of the report received from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur it would appear that cognizance has been taken and the case has been transferred for trial, and as such, the prayer of the petitioner for quashing of the F.I.R. does not survive. Considering the submissions, since after investigation charge sheet submitted, cognizance taken and the matter is pending for trial, and as such, the prayer of the petitioner for quashing of the F.I.R. does not survive. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)