IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.871 of 2008 RAJEENA KHATOON Versus MD. MAHFOOZ ALAM ----------- 3. 25.9.2008 Surendra/ Heard counsel for the petitioner. While this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order allowing amendment in paragraphs 7 and 8 of the matrimonial case, this Court would definitely take into account that on account of such belated amendment when evidence has been partly adduced, the defendant wife may have to now set up her own case in the light of the amendment made. That being so, this Court would direct the plaintiff opposite party to compensate the wife petitioner by paying a sum of Rs. 2500/- in addition to Rs.100/- by way of cost which must be paid within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. With the aforementioned observation, this application is dismissed. It goes without saying that the order of stay passed earlier shall automatically stand vacated. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)