IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 13TH AUGUST 2010 / 22ND SRAVANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 1997 of 2010() ---------------------------------------- CRIME NO.191/2010 OF MATHILAKAM POLICE STATION ........ PETITIONER (S): ACCUSED 1 TO 3 --------------------------------------------------- 1. VINAYAN, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O. LATE SUGATHAN, PUTHOOR HOUSE, KAIPAMANGALAM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. MINI, AGED 28 YEARS, W/O. VINAYAN, PUTHOOR HOUSE, KAIPAMANGALAM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. K. SUBERADA, AGED 61 YEARS, W/O. LATE SUGATHAN, PUTHOOR HOUSE, KAIPAMANGALAM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.RAMAN PILLAI SRI.ANIL SRI.ANIL K,MUHAMMED SRI.V.B.SUJEESH MENON SRI.JOSEPH P.ALEX SRI.SHYAM ARAVIND SRI.T.ANILKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.TEKCHAND THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss V.RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------------------------------ Bail Application No.1997 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of August, 2010 ORDER The petitioners who are accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.191/2010 of Mathilakam Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 498 (A) read with Section 34 I.P.C, seek anticipatory bail. 2. Both the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned public prosecutor admitted that the matter has since been settled between the de facto complainant/wife and the petitioners. A communication has been produced from the Sub Inspector of Police, Mathilakam Police also to that effect. If so, the apprehension of arrest and harassment entertained by the petitioners is unfounded. Recording the settlement mentioned above, this application is closed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj