1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Sixth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms. Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.11380 of 2011 1 SURESH 2 MATHIYAZHAGAN 3 LATHA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.2 TO 4 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, USILAMPATTI, MADURAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.13 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.MUNIYANDI Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498(A) and 406 of I.P.C., in Crime No. 13 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the defacto complainant, a false acse has been registered against the petitioner under Sections 498(A) and 406 of I.P.C. He further submitted that the petitioners are are in-laws and they have nothing to do with the commission of offence and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the injured have demanded 15 sovereigns of jewels and they have misappropriated the property, which was presented at the time of marriage and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that on the basis of the complaint given by the defacto complainant viz., Ramya, a case has been registered against four persons and the first accused is her husband and the accused 2 and 3 are brothers-in-law and the fourth accused is the wife of the third accused and they are living separately, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Usilampatti and on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dindigul, daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 26/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, USILAMPATTI. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI. 3. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, DINDIGUL. 4. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, USILAMPATTI, MADURAI DISTRICT. 6. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. S.MUNIYANDI Advocate SR. No.29213 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11380 of 2011 Date :26/08/2011 RJ/29.8.11 2p/8c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/