WP(C) 3645/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. D.C. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. Roy, learned State Counsel appearing for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that though the proce ss for settlement of Lahorighat Bi-Weekly Market was initiated by the Moirabari Anchalik Panchayat by issuing the NIT dated 6th May, 2011 pursuant to which the petitioner has submitted his bid, the Zilla Parishad has not finalized the said process though the Anchalik Panchayat has sent all the materials to Morigaon Zil la Parishad. On the backdrop of such assertion of the petitioner, this Court vide order dated 22nd July, 2011 directed the learned State Counsel to obtain necessary instruct ion. Mr. Roy, learned State Counsel appearing for the State respondents has submitted that the Zilla Parishad will definitely take a final decision in the matter rel ating to the settlement of Lahorighat Bi-Weekly Market and pass necessary order thereof at the earliest. Mr. Borah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that in vi ew of such submission made by the learned State Counsel, the writ petition may b e disposed of directing the Morigaon Zilla Parishad to take a final decision in the matter of settlement of the aforesaid Market at the earliest. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Morigaon Zilla Paris had to take a final decision in the matter of settlement of Lahorighat Bi-Weekly Market within 2 (two) weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of t he order passed today alongwith the copy of the writ petition and its annexures appended thereto to be produced by the petitioner before the Chief Executive Off icer of Morigaon Zilla Parishad. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.