1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3996 OF 2010 Shivaji Bichwa Pawar & anr. ..APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ..RESPONDENT Mr U.B. Bondar, Advocate for the applicants; Mr N.R. Shaikh, A.P.P. for the respondent - State. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS, J. DATE : 20th October, 2010 PER COURT : The applicants, who are accused in Crime No.77/2010, registered by the Kaij police station, District Beed for offence punishable under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, seek their release on bail pending the trial. It appears that the investigation has been completed and a charge-sheet has been filed. It further appears from the order of the Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, dated 20.9.2010, by which the application of the applicants came to be rejected, that the statement of the truck Driver clearly indicates the present applicants and also that the looted property had been recovered from the applicants, which has been 2 identified by the applicants as the property belonging to them. In the light of the existence of such strong prima facie material against the present applicants, I am not inclined to accede to the request of the applicants for their enlargement on bail. Consequently, there being no merit in the present application, application is rejected. ( P.V. HARDAS, J.) amj/criap3996.10