IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.83 of 2009 MANISH KUMAR SHARAN S/O MADAN MOHAN SHARAN,R/O MOHALLA- SHEIKHPURA, P.S.- SHASTRI NAGAR,DISTRICT- PATNA Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAMESH KUMAR AGRAWAL S/O LATE KHEMANCHAND AGRAAL C/O YOGENDRA RAI, R/O –INDRAPURI, ROAD NO. 5 a, P.S.- RAJEEV NAGAR, DISTRICT- PATNA ----------- 4 26/08/2009 I. A. No. 1642 of 2009 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for condoning the delay in filing this application. It is mentioned in the petition that there was delay of seven days in filing the instant application because the judgment was obtained very late in the first week of July, 2009, thereafter the petitioner has consulted to his lawyer of this court and the case was filed so, the delay occurred in filing this application. For the reasons mentioned the I. A. No. 1642 of 2009, the same is allowed and the delay in filing this application is condoned. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State on the petition filed by the petitioner for grant of special leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 9.4.2009 passed in Complaint Case No.1194 (C) of 2003/Trial No. 163 of 2009 by Sri Habibullah, J. M. Ist Class, Patna by which the opposite party no. 2 has been acquitted from the charges under sections 406 and 420 2 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that the petitioner wants to settle his business dispute through the process of the criminal court. The arbitration clause has been mentioned in the complaint petition itself which is apparent from the judgment. No ground of interference in the impugned judgment is made out. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)