IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.V.SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 5055 of 2001 Between: 1 P.Mohan Reddy, S/o. Subbarami Reddy, R/o. Sri Krishna Avenu, Nellore. 2 P. Vijitha, W/o. Mohan Reddy, R/o. Sri Krishna Avenue, Nellore. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Deputy Transport Commissioner, (Regional Transport Autority), Nellore. 2 A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 3 The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Nellore-I Depot, Nellore. 4 The Superintendent of Police, Neloore. 5 The Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Nellore. 6 Sri Chalapathi, Depot Manager, Nellore-2 Depot, Nellore. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the A.P.S.R.T.C., in plying 23 buses as stage carriages instead of 17 stage carriages (covered by permits) on the mofussil service routes by changing the buses everyday, without permits as arbitrary, malaﬁde, illegal, unfair and unjust, and pass such other orders. Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.M.RAVINDRANATH REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR TRANSPORT The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.V.SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO :5055 of 2001 ORAL ORDER: The grievance of the Petitioners in this Writ Petition is that the A.P. State Road Transport Corporation (A.P.S.R.T.C.) is plying six buses on the Mofussil routes in excess of the 17 Permits obtained by them. The A.P.S.R.T.C. ﬁled a Counter stating to the eﬀect that the said allegation was not correct. Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, learned Counsel appearing for the A.P.S.R.T.C. submitted that as per Rules, the A.P.S.R.T.C. was permitted to use, substitute vehicles as and when one of the permit vehicles fell into disrepair. The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners brought to the notice of the Court that an interim order was passed on 25.4.2001 in W.P.M.P. No. 6452 of 2001 in W.P. No. 5055 of 2001 directing the Respondent Authorities to consider the representation of the Petitioners with regard to their grievance and dispose of the same within a period of one month. The learned Counsel would submit that in the light of this interim order, no further orders are required. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________​______ P.V. SANJAY KUMAR,J DATE: 11th September, 2008 Pnb