1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 1500 of 2001 (Ghanshyam Mahadeo Sharma Vs. The Addl. Collector, Buldana & 2 ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. P.S. Tiwari, h/f Mr. A.S. Kilor, Adv. For petitioner. CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATE : 18 th December, 2008 Shri P.S. Tiwari submits that Shri Y.G. Khobragade, the learned counsel for the petitioner, is now appointed as a Judge. Mr. M. Khirale who has also filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner, is not present in the Court today. It is submitted by Shri Tiwari that Shri Anil Kilor who was looking after the matter on behalf of the petitioner, has filed a pursis stating that he has issued a communication dated 9/11/2008 to the petitioner by Registered Post A.D., stating therein that if no instructions are received from the petitioner, the counsel for the petitioner would not be responsible for any adverse orders in the petition. Along with the pursis, an acknowledgment of the registered letter is also 2 annexed and this shows that the petitioner has received the communication on 12/11/2008. It, thus, appears from the statements made on behalf of the counsel for the petitioner in the pursis and the documents annexed thereto, that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE RMP