IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12438 of 2005 Between: 1 Ukku Sumathi, W/o Janardhan, 2 Ukku Muni Chandraiah, s/o Ramanaiah, 3 T. Ravi. S/o Sankaraiah, 4 Ukku Muneiah, S/o Thambaiah, 5 B. Munaswami, W/o Raghavaiah, 6 B. Dhasaradha Rami Reddy, s/lo Pitchi Reddy, 7 A. Ramanaiah, S/o Adaiah, 8 M. Chandraiah, s/o Alaiah, 9 B. Chengaiah, S/o Subbaiah 10 B. Narayana Reddy, S/o Pitchai Reddy, 11 Ch. Alleliah, s/o Lakshmaiah, 12 P. Madhu, S/o Subbaramaiah, 13 P. Dasaratha Ramaiah, S/o Subbaiah, 14 P. Sulochanamma, W/o Dasaradha Ramaiah, 15 G. Santhi, W/o Chengaiah, 16 Atla Ramanaiah, S/o Alleiah, 17 Ch. Srinivasulu Reddy. S/o Ramana Reddy, All are R/o Aruru Village, Chittamur Mandal, Nellore District. ... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Additional Assistant Engineer (Operation) A.P. Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, Chittamur, Nellore District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Chttamur Mandal, Chittamur, Nellore District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may leased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in disconnecting the electricity service connections of the petitioners by his proceedings dt. 7-5-2005 of the 1st respondent on 12-5-2005 itself as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and in violation of principles of natural justice. Counsel for petitioners: Mr. P. Gangarami Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: Mr. O. Manohar Reddy Counsel for respondent No.2: G.P., Revenue The Court made the following Order: In this writ petition, petitioners have questioned the action of the respondents in disconnecting their electricity service connections. By order dated 14-06-2005 passed in W.P.M.P.No.15819 of 2005, this court directed the respondents to restore power supply subject to furnishing an undertaking by the petitioners. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that in compliance of the aforesaid order passed by this court, respondents have restored the power supply to the petitioners and they are utilizing the power by paying necessary consumption and demand charges as per the terms and conditions of supply. As much as it is stated that electricity service connections of the petitioners are already restored, I dispose of this writ petition directing the respondents to continue power supply to the petitioners subject to payment of necessary consumption charges as per the terms and conditions of supply. However, it is made clear that if the usage of power by the petitioners is in contravention of the terms and conditions of supply, this order will not preclude the respondents to issue notice to the petitioners and proceed in accordance with law. No costs. ________________________​ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. June 24, 2009 MRR ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{AVLR}