IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 31ST MAY 2010 / 10TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 16703 of 2010(K) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. ARUN.C.V, HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER (MATHEMATICS), GOVERNMENT H.S.S. THIRUNALLOOR, CHERTHALA. 2. VINOD V.ANAND, HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER (MATHEMATICS), GOVERNMENT H.S.S. KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI.S.SANTHOSH KUMAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDINGS, SANTHINAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. BABURAJ.J.K, HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER (MATHEMATICS), GOVERNMENT FISHERIES H.S.S. KUZHITHURA, ALAPPAD, KARUNAGAPALLY, KOLLAM. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. SANDESH RAJA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. ---------------------------------- WP (C) NO. 16703 of 2010 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioners are presently working as Higher Secondary School Teachers(Mathematics). The first petitioner is working as such in Government Higher Secondary School, Thirunalloor and the second respondent is presently working as such in Government Higher Secondary School, Konni. According to the petitioners, seniority has been fixed as per Exhibit P3 provisional transfer list in violation of Exhibit P1 norms. As per Exhibit P3 those who have grievances, if any, against the proposal are offered with an opportunity to raise their grievances. Availing that opportunity the petitioners have preferred Exhibit P4 representation before the second respondent. They have raised grievances with respect to the fixation of seniority in Exhibit P3, in that matter of WP (C) NO. 16703 of 2010 2 effecting transfer. Since they have already raised all such grievances and objection in Exhibit P4, without making observation to the merits of contentions raised by the petitioners in this writ petition, it is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P4, in case it was filed within the time stipulated in Exhibit P3, expeditiously, at any rate before finalization of Exhibit P3. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE. rkc