1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1171 OF 2007 (Vinodkumar s/o Shivnarayan Jaiswal and others vs. Taluka Inspector of Land Records and another) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 19, 2007 Heard Shri Kothari, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and Shri Mirza, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. Shri Kothari, learned Counsel for the petitioners, states that the petitioners have filed application dated 9.5.2005 before the respondent no.1 Taluka Inspector of Land Records for mutating their names in respect of properties in question on the basis of compromise decree passed by the competent Civil Court dated 26.11.1990 in Special Civil Suit 2 No.15/1978. However, till this date, the respondent no.1 has not communicated final order, if any, passed by him to the petitioners. It is, therefore, prayed that appropriate direction to the respondent no.1 may be given. Shri Mirza, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents, states that if the respondent no.1 Taluka Inspector of Land Records has not already decided application of the petitioners for mutation, same would be decided according to law and procedure applicable in this regard on its own merits at the earliest and order shall be communicated to the petitioners. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, nothing survives in the petition. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE JUDGE khj