IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. 5018-M of 2008 Date of decision : February 27, 2008 Madan Lal @ Nirmala Chela Mahant .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. A.S. Badal, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL J. This is a petition for direction to respondents No. 2 and 3 to register a case against respondent No. 4 for claiming compensation under Motor Vehicle Act, 1989 by misrepresenting facts and concealing facts before the learned Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal, Mukatsar. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner submitted a representation dated June 15, 2007 (Annexure P-2) to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur but so far no action has been taken. Keeping in view the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. and others 2008 (1) RCR (Criminal) 392 such a petition for direction to the police for registration of FIR could not be entertained as the petitioner has effective alternative remedy under Section 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and as such this Court would not like to interfere in the matter in its extra ordinary jurisdiction. Faced with this situation, Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, however, with liberty to the petitioner to avail of his alternative remedy in accordance with law. February 27, 2008 (Rajesh Bindal) Pka Judge