- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.242 OF 2006 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.74 OF 2006 ... Syndicate Bank ...Plaintiff v/s. Jayanthi S. Ray & Anr. ...Defendants ... Mr.S.R.Shetty for the Plaintiff. Mr.Amit Shinde i/b Amit & Co. for the Defendants. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 16TH AUGUST, 2006 P.C.: The Plaintiff is a bank. Defendant has been served. - 2 - Defendant has filed reply. The Plaintiff relies on an agreement signed by both the parties advancing loan. 2. Only defence raised is that the bank obtained signatures on the blank document. There is no explanation why the Defendant signed the blank document. Obviously, the defence has no substance. Defendant is not entitled to any leave to defend the suit. Summons for judgment is, therefore, granted. Suit of the Plaintiff is decreed in terms of prayer clause of the suit. Refund of court fees as per rules. ...