IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2011 / 20TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21933 of 2011(N) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- R.SINDHU,W/O.M.K.SASIDHARA KURUP, AGED 42 YEARS,HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT(MATHEMATICS), DEVASWOM BOARD HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,CHERIYANAD, CHENGANNUR-689511. BY ADVS. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, JAGATHY,TRIVANDRUM-695014. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688001. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MAVELIKKARA-690101. 5. THE SECRETARY(CORPORATE MANAGER OF SCHOOLS),TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD,NANTHENCODE, TRIVANDRUM-695001. BY SRI. V. VIJULAL, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.21933/2011 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT. P1 : COPY OF ORDER OF APPOINTMENT OF PETITIONER DTD. 20.12.95. EXT. P2 : COPY OF ORDER OF APPOINTMENT OF PETITIONER DTD. 20.7.07. EXT. P3 : COPY OF ORDER No.44221/08/EDN. OF R5 DTD. 27.5.08. EXT. P3(a) : COPY OF ORDER No.B6/4218/08 OF R4 DTD. 27.10.09. EXT. P4 : COPY OF ORDER No.B6.4218/08 OF R4 DTD. 27.3.09. EXT. P5 : COPY OF ORDER No.B3/2795/11/L.DIS. OF District Educational Officer, KANJIRAPALLY DTD. 4.7.11. EXT. P6 : COPY OF REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE GOVT. ] DTD. 11.7.11. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. // True Copy // P.A. to Judge. smp T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.21933 OF 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of August, 2011. J U D G M E N T It is a case where approval to the promotion of the petitioner as High School Assistant (Mathematics) was not granted for want of approval to the transfer of a senior claimant. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that by Ext.P5, the said transfer has been approved. It is therefore submitted that there is no legal impediment for approving the promotion of the petitioner who is a Rule 43 claimant. The petitioner has filed Ext.P6 revision petition before the Government seeking approval to her promotion. 2. There will be a direction to the Government to take a decision on Ext.P6 revision petition, after hearing the petitioner and the 5th respondent, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp