IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16367 of 2011 1. Neelam Devi 2. Ranjeet Sah 3. Pintu Sah Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 24.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 436 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The specific accusation is against petitioner no.2 Ranjeet Sah and petitioner no.3 Pintu Sah to have put the house of the informant on fire, though, there is counter version of the occurrence also and there is land dispute between the parties. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that other accused persons have been granted regular bail. Since, there is no specific accusation against petitioner no.1, let the above named petitioner no.1, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a 2 period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 535/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. So far as petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are concerned, let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner nos. 2 and 3, in view of the fact that there is land dispute between the parties and there is counter version of the occurrence also and dispose of the regular bail application of the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 on the same day if they surrender within a period of four weeks. With the observation above, the bail application of petitioner nos. 2 and 3 is disposed off. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)