IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41441 of 2009 RUDAL RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 30.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is said indulged in sexual relation with the informant on assurance of marriage. It appears that petitioner has been cheated by the informant as she was married and there was no divorce even affair was expecting end in marriage. There is no need to specify that it was consented one. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura in G.R.No. 395/2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)