WP(C) 4519/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. P K Talukdar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.3, 4, 7 and 9. the State r espondents are represented by Mr. J Handique, learned Govt. Advocate. The petitioner is managing a retail outlet at Dadhara, Tezpur and is aggrieved by sealing of the HSD Dispensing Noozle and the under ground Reservoir Tank of t he retail outlet, on orders passed by the Dy. Director of Supply and Consumer Af fairs. When the matter is taken up, Mr. Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner su bmits that for petrol supply the retail outlet is not obstructed, but because of the impugned orders, the petitioner is not able to sale diesel from their said outlet. The learned counsel further submits that an Appeal dated 13.8.2009 with a prayer to unseal the HSD Dispensing Noozal and the underground tank in the ret ail outlet of the petitioner filed before the Dy. Commissioner, Sonitpur has bee n pending and this case be disposed of by directing the said authority to consid er and pass appropriate orders on the said Appeal. The learned counsels appearing for the respondents do not object to the consider ation of the pending Appeal by the Dy. Commissioner, Sonitpur. In view of the limited submission and the agreement, this case is disposed of wi th a direction the Dy. Commissioner, Sonitpur to pass appropriate orders on meri t in the Appeal (Annexure-XIII) filed by the petitioner. The petitioner may furn ish a copy of this Court’s order and a copy of the writ petition containing the said Appeal to enable the Dy. Commissioner, Sonitpur to take steps for disposing of the Appeal. The entire process of considering and passing of the order may b e completed within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thi s Court’s order. The petitioner may not be disturbed in selling petrol from his retail outlet as there is no allegation of irregularity in dispensation of petrol.