IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 12547 of 2009 Between: Sri Rama Towers Owners/Tenants Association rep. by its Secretary K.Yadagiri S/o. K.Sayanna having their office at 4-1-896 Tilak Road Abids, Hyderabad .... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner & Special officer, GHMC, having its office at Lower Tank Bund, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad 2 Mr.Mohammed Naveed Ali S/o. Not known to the petitioner R/o.24, Sri Rama Towes Tilak Road, Abids, Hyderabad 3 Smt.K.Suvarna S/o.K.Krishna Reddy R/o.3-6-111/7, Hiamayathnagar, Hyderabad ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other proper writ or other order or direction in the nature of writ against the respondent No.1 thereby directing to remove the structure raised over and above the first floor by the respondent No.2 and 3 in the Tower known as Sri Rama Towes at 4-1-896, Tilak Road, Abids, Hyderabad and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.DAMODAR MUNDRA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: R.RAMACHANDRA REDDY,SC FOR MCH The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 12547 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the inaction on the part of the first respondent in considering the representation made by the petitioner dated 15.6.2009 complaining about the alleged illegal and unauthorized constructions being made by the respondents 2 and 3 on the 2nd floor of Sri Rama Towers, Tilak Road, Abids, Hyderabad, as arbitrary and illegal. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent- Corporation. 3. As could be seen from the material on record, the representation/complaint made by the petitioner Association was received in the office of the first respondent on 15.6.2009. In the circumstances, the first respondent is bound to consider the representation/complaint and make necessary enquiry into the allegations made by the petitioner Association. 4. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to the correctness of the allegations made, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage with a direction to the first respondent to consider the representation/complaint of the petitioner dated 15.6.2009 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity to the respondents 2 and 3 to rebut the allegations. Such an exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. _____________ G.ROHINI, J Dt.26-06-2009 Note: - Issue C.C by tomorrow (B/o) RAR THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 12547 of 2009 DATED : 26-06-2009