IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 4964 of 2008 Between: PMR Constructions, Rep. by its Proprietor, Sri P. Mallikarjuna Reddy, S/o. Subba Rami Reddy, R/o. Door No. 23/983, Shop No.6, 1st Floor, Ravula Shopping Arcade, Nellore Town, Nellore District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Ramannapet Police Station, Nalgonda District. 2 The Inspector of Police, Ramannapet Circle, Nalgonda District. 3 The Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda District. 4 Mr. HAO CHAOLI S/o Not Know to the Petitioner, EWPL Project, India, C-9, 103, Sanskrit Town Ship, Pocharam Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, R.R. District. 5 Mr. R.K. Dadda S/o Not Know to the Petitioner, Rajbhavan Road, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. 6 Mr. WANG S/o Not Know to the Petitioner, EWPL Project, India, C-9, 103, Sanskrit Town Ship, Pocharam Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, R.R. District. 7 Mr.LUU S/o Not Know to the Petitioner, EWPL Project, India, C-9, 103, Sanskrit Town Ship, Pocharam Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, R.R. District. 8 Mr. Tai S/o Not Know to the Petitioner, EWPL Project, India, C-9, 103, Sanskrit Town Ship, Pocharam Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, R.R. District. 9 Mr. Ramakrishna S/o Not Know to the Petitioner, Rajbhavan Road, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. 10 Mr.Jayaram Reddy S/o Not Know to the Petitioner, Rajbhavan Road, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. 11 CAT (Cater Pillar) Operator, Name Not Know to the Petitioner, Rajbhavan Road, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:D.KANAKA SUNDAR Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons and facts stated above the petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an order or orders more particularly on the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the acts of the Respondents herein are illegal, arbitrary and violative of Criminal justice and Procedure by keeping pending of the complaint of the petitioner from 04.01.2008 to 14.01.2008 in the office of respondent No.3 herein and also declare that it is illegal and irregular by not taking up investigation in Crime No.4/2008 though the case is registered on 18.01.2008 by way of recording the statements of witnesses as well as defacto-complainant and direct the Respondents herein to take up speedy and effective investigation by recording the statements u/S.161 of Cr.P.C. and to visit the scene of offence to prepare observation report as required u/S.157 of Cr.P.C. in Crime No.4/2008 for the offence under Sections 323, 307, 506, 447 and 427 of IPC and violation of court orders against the accused persons.” At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file appropriate application before the jurisdictional Magistrate. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP.No.6439 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 10th MARCH, 2008 kvni