CM No. 1679-CI of 2013 in 1 RFA No. 4159 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CM No. 1679-CI of 2013 in RFA No. 4159 of 2010 Date of decision February 12, 2013 Subhash etc. ...... Appellant Vs. State of Haryana and others ........ Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. R. A. Yadav, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Kunal Garg, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Advocate for respondent No.3 **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). CM No.1679-CI of 2013 The application is allowed. Additional affidavit is taken on record. RFA No.4159 of 2010 With the consent of both the parties, the case is taken up for hearing today. The counsel for both the parties agree that the issue for adjudication has been covered through a judgment of the CM No. 1679-CI of 2013 in 2 RFA No. 4159 of 2010 Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6515 of 2009 Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Vs. Pran Sukh and others. As per the judgment the compensation has been assessed at `20 lacs and accordingly the award of the Reference Court stands modified and the compensation is raised to `20 lacs with all statutory benefits. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE February 12, 2013 arhana