IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 103 OF 2009 SHRI MOHAMMAD ASLAM, PRESENTLY SERVING SENTENCE AT CENTRAL JAIL, AGUADA ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA AND 2 ORS. ... Respondent Mrs. Asha Dessai, Advocate for the Petitioner. Coram:- R. M. SAVANT, J. Date:- 18th January, 2010 P.C. The above Petition has been filed seeking reduction in the surety amount which has been mentioned in the Order dated 28.08.2009, granting Parole of twenty one days to the Petitioner. The Petitioner seeks reduction of the surety amount on the grounds mentioned in the Petition and principally on the ground that the Petitioner is not in a position to furnish surety to the extent mentioned in the said Order dated 28.08.2009. 2. It is the case of the Petitioner that on the earlier occasion when Parole was granted, the surety fixed was to the extent of Rs.10,000/-, which was in the year 2006. It is the case of the Petitioner that he has availed of the said Parole and returned to prison. 3. In view of the ground mentioned in the preamble of the said Order, which ground, in my view, cannot be said to exist after a lapse of more than four months. The benefit of the said Order granting Parole cannot be granted to the Petitioner at this point of time. The case of the Petitioner for reduction of surety amount, therefore, cannot be considered in the instant Criminal Writ Petition. 4. It would be open for the Petitioner to file a fresh application for Parole if the ground so exists. If such an application is made, the authorities are directed to dispose of the same within a period of four weeks from the receipt of the same. 5. With the aforesaid observations, the Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of. R. M. SAVANT, J. arp/*