IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 941 of 2008 Neeraj Tyagi and others .......... Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ......... Respondents Mr. K.S. Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for respondent No.3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. K.S. Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for respondent No.3. 2. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; the contents of the F.I.R.; the averments made against the petitioners in the F.I.R.; the fact that the victim has sustained five injuries, out of these five injuries one injury was grievous in nature; the fact that the allegations against the husband as well as petitioner No. 4 Jagan Nath Tyagi are of serious nature; the fact that on the perusal of the case diary, the petitioners are not entitled to get reliefs as claimed by them in the petition. The writ petition is liable to be dismissed in limine and is hereby dismissed in limine. 3. However, Keeping in view the role and the nature assigned to the petitioner Nos.1 to 3, Neeraj Tyagi, Vipin Tyagi and Smt. Hem Lata, I deem it fit and proper if the petitioners Neeraj Tyagi, Vipin Tyagi and Smt. Hem Lata are produced before the Court or brought before the Court or surrender before the Court, their bail applications shall be disposed of expeditiously. It is, further made clear that this relief is not granted to the petitioner No.4 Jagan Nath Tyagi. 4. The CLMA No. 7936 of 2008 stands disposed of accordingly. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 11.12.2008 Shiv