IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2009 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 DBA.No. 152 of 2009() --------------------- (IN THE MATTER OF APPROVAL AND SANCTION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NALAMBALAM WITH BALIKKALPURA AND THIDAPPALI IN KARUMAMUTTAM DEVASWOM IN MAVELIKKARA GROUP) PETITIONER -------------- THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.N.VENUGOPALA PANICKER, SC, TDB RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE DEPUTY EXAMINER, LOCAL FUND AUDIT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER SRI.V.T.K.MOHANAN. THIS DEVASWOM BOARD APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/12/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON ------------------------------- D.B.A.No. 152 of 2009 ------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd December, 2009 O R D E R Raman, J. This application is filed seeking sanction for construction of Nalambalam with Balikkalpura and Thidappali in Karunamuttam Devaswom in Mavelikkara Group. By Ext.A3 Order passed in D.B.A.No. 60 of 2009 and connected cases, we declined sanction as there was no budgetary provision. However, we permitted to include the same in the priority list and taken up as and when funds are available and budgetary provisions are made. Liberty was also given to move afresh after compliance of the directions. Hence, the present application. 2. It is averred in paragraph 6 of the affidavit filed in support of the application that the work has been included in the budget provision for the year 2009-2010, and it has been DBA.No.152 of 2009 2 included in the priority also. Annexure-IV is produced in support thereof. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also. 4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the sanction sought for is accorded subject to usual audit. D.B.A. is allowed as above. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. nj.