IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 34518 of 2008(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.K.REENA, NEEDLE WORK TEACHER (CRAFT) S.N.T.T.I, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.34518/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of November, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner was aggrieved by Ext.P2, by which the benefit of Government Orders dated 19.5.1971 and 10.2.1980 has been denied to her. According to the petitioner, seeking review of this order, invoking the power of the first respondent under Rule 93 Chapter XIV-A KER, the petitioner filed Ext.P4 and the same is pending, petitioner submits. In this writ petition, what is sought for is a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P4 has been received and the same is pending, it being a statutory application, it is necessary for the first respondent to pass orders thereon. 2 Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the first respondent shall consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 3 weeks from the date of production of a copy copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. 3