- 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION No. 1060 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION No. 960 OF 2008 Pardeshi Balkrishna Patil & Ors. .. Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra & ors. ..Respondents Mr. P. S. Kansara, for the Applicants. Mr. R. M. Patne, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5. CORAM : R. C. CHAVAN, J. DATED : APRIL 30, 2010. P.C. : . The applicants seek to have license renewed by this application, on the basis of an interim order passed by this Court in a petition filed in respect of a different license. The learned counsel for the Applicants has been repeatedly trying to tell that because of pendency of the petition, the licensing authorities are not renewing the license. The learned AGP tendered affidavit-in-reply for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 which does not show that the authority has refused to renew the license - 2 - on the ground of pendency of this petition. If renewal of the license of the petitioner is refused on the grounds which have nothing to do with the present petition, the petitioners’ remedies would lie elsewhere. Therefore, application is thoroughly misconceived and rejected accordingly. Sd/- [R. C. CHAVAN, J.]