^. IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No.3^of2011 9n#9 Bencfc (For Restoration ofW.P.(227) No.1441 of 2010) ^ Ap^licant Pjetitioner ^laintiff y Non-applicants ^espondents Defendants .<?' ^ /^ /.^' i/ .y A^> <%^ ^'w &\ ^^^^ / & ^n^y Ira Singh, S/o. Dhyan Singh, aged about 70 years, R/o. Mangla Chowk, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus :1) Chhedilal Ratre, S/o. Bhaiyalal ^ Ratre, :2). Sanjay Ratre, S/o. Bhaiyalal Ratre Both are R/o. Village Uslapur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) :3) ^State of Chhattisgarh through the collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) :4) Naib Tahsildar, Sakri, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESfORATION OF W.P.(227) NoT441 OF 2010 DISMISSED FOR WANT QF PROSECUTION ON 13ut)4.2011 XI-HC—78 ^TPTCW fhWCh ^sr T^i^i<?<^, yxily<i<o, [®i<rii^^< .h^MQ.'.^.^/ji \ <0 -^ 200 ^H^T^T'ft^F WT^IT^T^TOW (^ ^ff Tf^! (^T^^) ^"RrTwnf^T ^n^r ^BTHON'BLE MR.JUSTIOE NX. AGARWAL 21,07.2011: Shri Ravish Verma, c|3unsel for the petitioner. Shri Akhil Agrawal, P^inel Lawyer forthe State. The petitioner is sejeking restoratjon of Writ Petitjw (227) No.1441/2010 which was orderdated 13.04.2011. On due consideratiorl dismissed for want of prosecution vkle for the petitioner and the g|-ounds taken in the restoratton petition, 1 am satisfied that the at^sence of the petitioner's eour^el on 13.04.2011 when Writ Petiljon (227) No. 1441/2010 was taken-up tor hearing was based on bon^ M.C.C.No. 385/201' (227)No. 1441/2011 isrestt ^qfef^ •Wf^f ^ ft%t Tf^?R ^T^tRWW^T of the submission of the learned counsel fide grounds. , therefore, is allowed and Wrtt Petition »redto its original number. _ --—' Sd/- "^"