1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.11.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION (PD) No.2205 of 2011 Yobu Vethanayagam .. Petitioner Vs. Esakki Selvi @ Angelin Selvi .. Respondent Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order dated 06.07.2011 passed in Interlocutory Application No.102 of 2010 in I.D.O.P.No.131 of 2008 by the First Additional District Court, Tirunelveli. For Petitioner : Mr.T.A.Ebenezer ORDER The impugned order dated 06.07.2011 passed in Interlocutory Application No.102 of 2010 in I.D.O.P.No.131 of 2008 by the First Additional District Court, Tirunelveli is being challenged in the present Civil Revision Petition. 2. The revision petitioner herein as petitioner has filed I.D.O.P.No.131 of 2008 on the file of the Court below praying to pass a decree of divorce, wherein the present respondent has been shown as sole respondent. The respondent as petitioner has filed Interlocutory Application No.102 of 2010 for the purpose of getting interim monthly maintenance as well as litigation expenses at the rate of Rs.15,000/- and Rs.25,000/- respectively. The Court below after considering all the contentions raised on either side has directed the respondent therein to pay a sum of Rs.3,000/- as interim monthly maintenance and Rs.5,000/- towards litigation expenses. Against the quantum fixed by the Court below, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner has contended that the revision petitioner has been maintaining his son and also aged mother and he is nothing, but a real estate broker and he is not having sufficient wherewithal so as to give the quantum of amounts fixed by the Court below and therefore the quantum of amounts fixed by the Court below is liable to be modified. 4. Considering the fact that the Court below has fixed Rs.3,000/- as interim monthly maintenance and Rs.5,000/- towards litigation expenses, this Court is of the view that the amounts fixed by the Court below are not excessive and therefore the present Civil https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Revision Petition deserves to be dismissed. 5. In fine, this Civil Revision Petition deserves dismissal and accordingly is dismissed without costs at the stage of admission and the order passed in Interlocutory Application No.102 of 2010 in I.D.O.P.No.131 of 2008 by the First Additional District Court, Tirunelveli is confirmed. However the First Additional District Court, Tirunelveli is directed to dispose of I.D.O.P.No.131 of 2008 before the end of January, 2012 and report the same to the Registry without fail. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The First Additional District Court, Tirunelveli. Copy to: The Section Officer, Judicial Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.2205 of 2011 29.11.2011 smn SMA/2.12.2011/3C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/