IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 821 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION St. NO. 11445 OF 200 WRIT PETITION St. NO. 11445 OF 200 WRIT PETITION St. NO. 11445 OF 2006 Sudam Krishna Kamble.... Petitioner versus Municipal Commissioner of Gr. Mumbai and ors. ...... Respondent. Shri V.M.Parkar for the petitioner. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 26TH JUNE, 2007 DATED; 26TH JUNE, 2007 DATED; 26TH JUNE, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. W.P.St. No. 11445/06 came to be filed by the applicant. There were certain objections and the same were notified by the Registrar (Judicial) for removal of office objections. The learned counsel for the applicant was not present,as in advertantly he has missed the case from the causelist. The Registrar had granted two weeks time to remove office objections failing which the registration was to be refused without further reference. By the present civil application, a prayer is made for setting aside the said order and for restoration of the writ petition. By filing an affidavit, a typographical mistake in regard to the date of the passing of the order by Registrar is sought to be corrected. The date of the order passed by the Registrar is 13-7-2006 whereas it is wrongly stated as 5-8-2006. On an oral prayer made, the correction is allowed. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the order passed by the Registrar dated 13-7-2006 is set aside and writ petition is restored to file. The applicant shall remove the office objections within a period of two weeks from today. ...