s^'^ 'a..'"' XI-HE—78 an^r 'W Ki-fi'sb wn aii^i **<i«ti *ii*<wi s»i*irai ^=T "LII'Llld-4, sS'til'H'lia, fs|(?)l'Hlj,< -^....^i.:...^0:...^2:.^?" sn^r Tra^' (l°iF^«<<^T) wnwafeisii^i PETTTIONBR VQE'SUS RESPOHDBNT'S 1. ShyamJal |Prajapati, S/o Late Shri Vishnu Prasad Pr^japati, «ged about 30 years, R/o vulage F|algadi, post Lahpatra, Tahsil Ambikapu^, Distt. Surguja (CG) ijtate o) Revsnud (CG) State Revenud Bhopal Chhatdsgarh, through Secretaiy, Dcpartment, DKS Bhawan, Raipur ofl MacUiva Coniuu^ Madhya| Kaipur, WRJT PETITION UNDd SB: HON. SHRI DHIREWDRA IIIISHR&. J 6-2-2009 Shri Vaibhav Govardbanl Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel| The petitioner has ffled respondents to cousider the cs appointment as his father late| 16-11-1995, while serving as Shri Vaibhav Goverdha|i, petitioner subinits fhat fhe appointment was duly consid^red <=»i|<l[^]<4il ^WV^ ^f f^t^) <f^^j< ^aifinaiT^r Pradesh, throiigh Secretary Department, Vauabh Bhawan, (M.P.) iniuus^iioner, Laud Recond aud Scttleiuent, [Pradesh, Gwaiior Conuiu^sioner Land Record aud Settleinent, ;G UNDdR ARTICLE 236/227 OF THE CGKSTITtUTiOH OF INDtA. Advocate, tbr Uie petitioner. Lawyer, for tfae State. flie instant petitiou for direction to the ^se of the petitioner for conipassionate Shri Vishuu Prasad Prajapati died on i^evenue Inspector at Distt. Sai^uja. i, leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner's case for coinpassioiiat& munediatelv after the death of the \..-._. - XI-HC—78 TSET -^ww^, yv\wis, hwvy, C^P-rte- C{'2-8/('>^— •w»i?(rshiich an^l Tra^? ('i'lf^'S?) S^V V Wl'h '?Tsff3TT^?T sft*i|ch <=hl^^Ti<1l *1!H<lll' "^f FS^ <(^1^.1< ^i'affinan^r SubSequ^ntly tatfaer of the petitioner and it Patwari tramiag, but because appointruent on the post of Pi not be considered. Chliatdsgarh, the authoriHes i fhe case of the petitioner for officers vide Annexure P-14, F has been taken in the matter petiuoner. |was directed that he mav be sent for VSf of teinporaiy ban on coiapassionate ^twari, fhe case of fhe petitioner could titly, after fonnation of the State of, ^fthe respondents State reconunended compassionate appoiutment to higher L 15 and P-17 but tiu date, no decision. of coiupassiouate appoiaQiient of fhe Despite several opport) retum has not been filed by thfcm Luuties aUowed to the respondents, Shri VafDhav Govaidhaj|i be disposed of with Mberty representation before fhe r^ appomtment under ftie appouutineut, who may be specified period as the petiti( for last more fhaili t., Adv. submits that ttus petition may to fhe petitioner to make a fresh |spondent No, 1 for coinpassionate ^xisting poticy tor coinpassionate directed to decide his case within a [3ner has been deiued coiapassionate J.U years. turttier On the other hand, le^ Shri Ajay Dwivedi, subniit^ represeiitation before respond| med counsel appearing for fhe State that ia case, tlie petitipner files snt No. 1 tbrconsKleration ofhis case XI-H6—78 HI*<MT 9>*11<»» 3ST rt||<l|d<i|, ytll.M'16, [s<<ni<Hll.< . IL? P. t^-42.gj6^~ •WI. 200 ®II^TTR?T('pf3^?;t) 3TI^I W K-fw ^sn STI^T stt^iqi ^ TRIIWdfet 31A5I r^ ibr compassiouate appointtaeiit, decided wifhin a period ofS week| In view of fhe submissioil parties, this petition is dispose^ DiaKe a representaUon tor coxn.pt copy of the petition and a certjified respondent No. 1 wittun 10 representation beiag ffled, fhe sa|me by respondent No. 1 tn accor^aace compassionate appointment of tt| of eight weeks frova date of receipl: ^T^f^ft^ ^iWV\\ Tf^^ <P»I^R ^siRnai^ii the same shau be considercd and inade tov leamed coiinsel for the of wim liberty to the petitiouer to ^ssionate appointDient along with a copy of this order before fhc days froin today aad on such kae shaU be considered and decided wifh the existing policy for [e State Govemment wit.hin a period offiie representation.