1 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1621/2003 Smt. Pushpa Devi Salvi. vs. State of Rajasthan and others. Date : 2.7.2007 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.A Purohit, for the petitioner. Mr.R Arora ) for the respondents. Mr.OP Boob, Addl.GA ) - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 1.4.2003 (Annex.3) by which the petitioner was directed to report before the Joint Director, Medical and Health, Udaipur Division and by the same order, she was relieved as she was transferred. The writ petition was filed in the year 2003 and no interim relief was granted, therefore, the petitioner must have been working at her new place of posting. In view of the above, I do not find any reason to 2 interfere in the order passed by the respondents. It will be worthwhile to mention here that on earlier occasion, when the petitioner filed writ petition no.2691/1999 to challenge the order dated 5.8.1999, this Court disposed of that writ petition vide order dated 4.2.2003 on the sole ground that now the respondents may pass a fresh order as much time has passed after the order dated 5.8.1999. In these facts and circumstances, the petitioner's grievance against her transfer after almost about four years cannot be entertained. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner has any grievance, she may submit her representation and if the authorities find some reason for accommodating the petitioner, then they may pass appropriate order only in accordance with law. In view of the above, the writ petition to challenge the order dated 4.4.2003 is dismissed with liberty to submit representation only. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya