IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 22949 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 24.08.2011 Narender Singh Dhankar ...Petitioner Versus M/s Batra Auto Company ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Johan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Saini, Advocate for the respondent. …… RAJESH BINDAL, J. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in a complaint filed by the respondent under Sections 420, 120-B IPC. The petitioner along with co-accused was summoned to face trial. Though initially he sought exemption from personal appearance but the same was not granted by the learned court below. Thereafter warrants of arrest were issued against him and his anticipatory bail application was dis- missed by the learned court below. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that complaint was filed four years after the alleged incident. He will appear before the court below and furnish heavy surety. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the peti- tioner in connivance with Shiv Raj had fraudulently taken delivery of Ma- ruti 800 Car claiming that the same had been financed by Magma Leasing Ltd., which, in fact, was incorrect. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has been summoned to face trial in a complaint filed by the respondent for the incident which took place in the year 2004, in my opinion, the petitioner deserves the concession of pre-arrest bail and ac- cordingly it is directed that the petitioner may appear before the court below within ten days from today and furnish his bail bonds along with surety of ` 5,00,000/-. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 24.08.2011 sharmila