IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.6214 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:15.3.2011 Pankaj Kumar . . .Petitioner Versus Smt. Prem Lata . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Arvind Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would not argue on merits in case some time is granted to him to vacate the demised premises, which is in his possession since 2002. Learned counsel for the respondent also submits that he would not mind if some reasonable time is granted to the tenant to vacate. After hearing learned counsel for the parties in this regard and keeping in view that the petitioner is in occupation since 2002 and would have some difficulty in finding out alternative accommodation, a period of six months is granted to vacate the demised premises i.e. on or before 15.9.2011 subject to filing of an undertaking to the Rent Controller, Chandigarh and also clearing all the arrears of rent, if any due. The petitioner shall also keep on paying the rent of the ensuing months. It is made clear that in case of any violation of the undertaking, the petitioner shall be liable under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The petition is thus disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MARCH 15, 2011 JUDGE Vivek