IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH JULY 2008 / 19TH ASHADHA 1930 RP.No. 705 of 2008(E) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.5926/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN W.P.(C). --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NALLATHAMPI, NELSON, AGED 54 YEARS, VELIYAKOT TU PATTAYA KARAKATTUVILA, PUTHUVAL PURAYIDAM, AYIRAYIL DESOM KARODE VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. YOVEL ANIL KUMAR, AGED 34, VELLIYANKOTTU PATTA KARAKATTU, PUTHUVAL PURAYIDAM, AYIRAYIL DESOM, DARODE VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. YOVEL AJI KUMAR AGED 29 YEARS, VELIYAKOTTU PATTAYA KARAKATTUVILA, PUTHUVAL PURAYIDAM, AYIRAYIL DESOM, KARODE VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SUDHEENDRAN SRI.SURAJ.S RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN W.P.(C). ------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NALLATHAMPI NADAR VIJAYARAJ, AGED 51 YEARS PARAMBIL THOTTATHI PUTHEN VEEDU AYIRAL DESAM, KARODE VILLAGE NEYYATTINKARA 2. JOSEPH NADAR , DESAYYAN NADAR, AGED 56 YEARS, ENUASSERIVILAKATHU VEEDU, AYIRAYIL DESOM, KARODE VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA 3. YONA, S/O.CHARLES 51 YEARS, KALATHUCHANKUDY IRUPPU VEEDU, AYIRAYIL DESOM KARODE VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA 4. ROBINSON, S/O.NALLATHAMPI AGED 51, VELIYAMKOTTUPU PATTAYA KARAKOTTUVILA PUTHUVAL PURAYIDAM, AYIRAYIL DESOM, KARODE VILAGE, NEYYATTINKARA BY THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J. -------------------------- R.P. NO. 705 OF 2008 IN W.P.(C) NO. 5926 OF 2008 --------------------- Dated this the 10th day of July, 2008 ORDER This review petition is preferred by the writ petitioners in W.P.(C) No. 5926 OF 2008. The said writ petition was filed challenging the order in IA No.385/06 in AS No.341/03. This court dismissed that application. A perusal of the original order would show that there were 136 respondents. Just impleading four persons as respondents an appeal is filed in the year 2002-03 and an application for impleading 102 other persons is filed in the year 2006. This court held that under a Civil Procedure Code no respondent shall be added under the Rule after the expiry of the period of limitation for appeal, unless the court for reasons to be recorded allows that to be done on such terms as the court thinks fit. 2. Here, the appeal is filed even without the plaintiff on records. This court has no doubt regarding the power of the court to implead any such but, it must be supported by valid grounds and bonafides. It is totally absent in this case. Therefore, a decision has been taken whereby the writ petition was dismissed. 3. I do not find any error apparent on the face of the record or other grounds mentioned under Order XLVII Rule 1 to review the judgment. Therefore the review petition is dismissed. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE vps