35TH” Lanna. Prasad sahu 3/0 Devi myal sahu. aged about 35 years. Rio c/o vsha ‘Bav elinic. Ayodhyawri. $lt 0££icé Jamipdli, mttrict Korba (CG). ' 2d Pawan mar knjwmi s/o ahanker L31 Rnjwant. aged about 37 years. R/o Mam now. Kerb: (m). RTXT§W3 whe state of whattisgu'ho mmuqh the Bécrettry awn-went of Health and ' ramny welfata. untra1ay.n.x.s.muammnaipur. ‘I‘he State cf Madhya Prléesh . Much the matary manna: o£ Health an: ramily Welfare mnmlny. vallabh mam, mOPM. (MP). The M.P.3oari of Ayurveiic and Unani Systua M Mediein. and mum-apathy .nhopa (MP). Thmugh the Registrar. shyaala mus. ahapal (MP). it“ mhattiagazh Board o£ Ayurveri'lc and mam. Systea e£ Indiana and natuxopnthy ,mipu, Thraugh £1» mutanmzmm. WémQs mm Pmmma menu: Ammm 226/227 es- rm XI-HC-22 13 32.2003 \ Shri Prashant Mishra, counS for the petitionem. i‘tl DR . fo‘r .. Shn' ..Agrawa1, Dy. AG respondénts No. 1 ¢3 3 ég 4 None for respondents NQ2 . Since a commo qusson i 1volved in this wri p?titi, on the prayor of tho learned counsel r e paie it i$ heard and is being disposed o at the admission age f st. 311 View of the liited natur of the prayer made at the time m o g, oo to of heem‘n which ie for a direcn to the respondent No.4 corisider the qestion egitrati of the etitioner in aordance u of rso p cc with he rules, regulations and g eh'nes goerning the field, n i t t 'd v o pe i e p ts ti in , useful urpos will be served n k ing hi writ petion pendg, which on te pyer of learned o insel for the. parties, is being h ra r t isposed of at the amission stage d d . ccording to th petitione the have acquired Vaidya A e i , y Vishad and rved Rama ' lification from Hindi Sahitya ar Ayn q a Samelan, rayag e Allaabad a on the basis thereof, they had m P h n pproache, respondent No.4 for i ance of a for so as to enable- them t apply fo registration the said resondent No. id 2H” n ti s :1 t on \ fo th tis, \ ”ad s u m o r , b1 p 4 d {‘il%‘§@ not iSSue any form Wimfrhe msmlt that they have not'besn able to gét themselves registered as Phaikmacists Aggrieved therewith, the peiitioners are before this Court. In support of their claim for registration, reliangg is placed v on a decision of the NLP. High Court in MP. No.287f1990 (Sekhar Jain —Vs- State of M39.) mid Chhattisgarh High Coult in W.P.No.558/2001 (Zehirulla Khan 85 allother — Vs — State of ' Chhattisgarh 3y. others), copies whereof are annexed as Pf 1 8n P/ 13 to the writ petition. In rebumal, the State has relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court jnthe case of State of Raiasthari - Vs - Lata Axum? 2002 AIR. S.C.W. 2966. However, in View of the limited nature of the prayer mace, it is not necessary to go into the merits of the case. Accordingly, in View of the prayer made at the time of hearing, the Writ petition is disp )sed of by directing the respondent No.4 to issue appropriate fOrms to each petitioner, so as to enable them to apply for registration. It is made clear that the issuance of a form under the direction of a Court is not to be construed as a direction requiring the said respondent to grant registration to the [View v 3 ,‘ . a? XI-HC-22 WW; mar, WE? £7 W ' L“ 2/ ........./.“(K. ...... / 11m ‘ai 200 mmm WW %a‘ Wattm Wm n ~ p- e ‘ ‘ 34" , w petitioners. The Question of their registration will have to b decided on men'ts by the respondent No.4 in accordance with 1116 rule‘s, regulations and guidelines govelning the fleld and in case ‘ the authdiities come to the conclusion that under the said rules, \ regulations and“ guidelines the pititioners are not en&ed for registration, this order shall not preclude them from passing appropriate orders io that effect. ‘ With‘ the aforesaid okservations and directions, ‘M.W.P.N0‘768/2002 for interim relief and I.A.5422/2002 for urgent hearing stand disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. I: i .,/ V / it / Maw / w