IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11406 of 2010 CHANDAN KUMAR S/O SACHIDANAND SHARMA R/O VILL.- AMHARA,P.O.-AMHARA,P.S.-BIHTA,DIST.-PATNA-- Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --------------- Opposite party ----------- 04. 20.4.2011 Petitioner was taken into custody on 9.11.2008 when materials emerged against him in Bihta P S Case no. 261 of 2008 under sections 407, 120B, 134, 395, 412 of the Indian Penal Code read with section 25(1-B) of the Arms Act. Contention of the petitioner is that he has spent enough time in custody. The trial has not proceeded at the speed at which it ought to have proceeded. Other accused persons have been granted bail by the court and the case of the petitioner is identical to their case. An affidavit has been filed today on behalf of the uncle of the petitioner with an assurance that petitioner will co- operate in the trial, will not abscond and assures the Court that he will not indulge in any crime in future. Taking the totality of the submissions, let the petitioner Chandan Kumar be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the ACJM, Danapur in connection with Bihta P S Case No. 261 of 2008. One of the sureties will be executed by the uncle of the petitioner namely, Shashi Bhushan Sharma on due identification as to the identity of Shashi Bhushan 2 Sharma who is stated to be the uncle of the petitioner and the other surety will be executed by an elected representative. It goes without saying that petitioner will co- operated in the trial by appearing on each and every date either through himself or through his counsel and shall not indulge in any criminal activity or else the prosecution will have liberty to seek cancellation of his bail. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)