IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 971 OF 2005 SUMMONS NO. 971 OF 2005 SUMMONS NO. 971 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 457 OF NO. 457 OF NO. 457 OF 2005 Balkisan D. Sanghvi & anr. ....... Plaintiffs. versus Kiron D.Sanghvi & ors..... Defendants. ..... Shri N.G.Thakkar Sr. counsel with Sachin Chandarana and Samrat Rasal i/b. M.K.Ambalal & co. for plaintiff no.1. Manish Doshi i/b.M/s.Vimadalal & Co. for Defendant no.6. Ms. Jyotsna Mukherjee i/b. Rajani Associates for Defendant no.2. J.B.Chinai with Ms. Sonal i/b. Zohair & Co.for defendants 3 to 5. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM ; A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. ; A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. ; A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED; DATED; DATED; 31ST AUGUST, 31ST AUGUST, 31ST AUGUST, 2005 2005 2005 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. Heard counsel for the parties. Manish Doshi appears for original plaintiff no.2 proposed defendant no.6. He has no objection for granting present Chamber Summons in terms of prayer clause (a). Mr. Chinai appears for defendants 3 to 5. He submits that if all the contentions are left open to be agitated by the respective parties in the main proceeding, the relief claimed in the Chamber Summons may be granted without prejudice to the rights of the parties. Accordingly Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within four weeks. No order as to costs. 2. It is made clear that granting of Chamber Summons is not the expression of opinion on merits of the controversy, which issues are left open to be decided at the appropriate time. ****