1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5465 OF 2008. Tilakchand Tarachand Larokar & Ano. Vs. Wamanrao Tilakram Jagnade ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri J. S. Charlewar Adv. for petitioner. Shri Tiwari Adv. for respondent. CORAM: C. L. PANGARKAR J. DATED: 3 rd JULY, 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondent. This Writ Petition is filed against the order passed by the trial Court whereby trial Court directed the respondent to pay Rs. 500/- P. M. The petitioner has filed the suit for ejectment on the ground that respondent is a licencee and his occupation is gratuitous. Inspite of such statement having been made by the petitioner-plaintiff, trial 2 Court had directed the respondents to deposit Rs. 500/- in the Court. There is in fact no reason for the petitioner to be aggrieved by the said order because in any case the petitioners contention is that the respondent is a gratuitous licencee. I do not see that there is any need to interfere with the order. There is no substance in the petition. It is dismissed in limine. JUDGE svk