IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2011/18TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 11293 of 2011 (J) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- PRAJOSH.K.T., S/O.SARADA, KOYYERITHAZHAM HOUSE, ERANHIPALAM P.O. KOZHIKODE-673 006. BY ADVS.SRI.P.T.MOHANKUMAR SRI.S.K.SAJU SRI.A.RANJITH NARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1.CORPORATION OF KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE KOZHIKODE CORPORATION, BEACH ROAD KOZHIKODE-673 032. 2.THE KOZHIKODE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE HOSPITAL LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY ERANHIPALAM, KOZHIKODE-673 006. BY ADV. SRI.K.D.BABU,SC,KOZHIKODE CORPORATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-04-2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.11293/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.(C).NO.22572/2010 DATED 7.9.2010. P2: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM IN APPEAL NO.815/2009 DATED 29.10.2009. P3: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 2.6.2010. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P(C)No.11293 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated 8th April, 2011 JUDGMENT In this writ petition, the petitioner attempts to put up a challenge against Ext.P2 order passed by the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions in Appeal No.815/2009. Evidently, the said order was passed on 29.10.2009. There is no proper explanation for the petitioner for the long delay in filing this writ petition to assail Ext.P2 order allowing the appeal preferred by the second respondent, the Kozhikode District Co-operative Hospital Ltd., Kozhikode against the rejection of building permit. I am of the view that on that sole ground this writ petition is liable to be dismissed. Therefore, on account of the failure on the part of the petitioner to explain the inordinate delay in challenging Ext.P2 order, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS