1 sast25079-11 rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION SECOND APPEAL (ST.) NO. 25079 OF 2010 Baburao Laxman Kad .. Appellant V/s. Subhash Tukaram Kad & Ors. .. Respodnents ..... Mr. V. B. Tapkir for the appellant. Mr. Abhaykumar Apte for the respondents. ..... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 16, 2011. P.C.: This is a Second Appeal preferred by Baburao Laxman Kad who is the original defendant No.2 impleaded in his capacity as a legal representatives of Laxman Aba Kad against the same impugned Judgment and decree. The defendant No.1 Dyanoba who is also impleaded as a legal representatives of deceased Laxman admittedly preferred Second Appeal No.159 of 2011 for challenging the same decree. By the Judgment and order dated 2nd September, 2011, this Court has dismissed the Second Appeal summarily by holding that there is no substantial question of law. This Court has confirmed the finding recorded by the Court below on the issue of partition between the Tukaram and Laxman. 2 sast25079-11 2. In view of the Judgment and order dated 2nd September, 2011, this Appeal cannot be entertained and the same is dismissed with no order as to costs. (A.S.OKA, J.)