IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.23475 of 2010 1. SANOJ SAH @ SAROJ SAH & 2. Lallu Sah Both sons of Sri Baban Sah Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 14.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 379, 307,337 504/34, and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that on account of minor dispute which escalated into the present occurrence number of persons were injured in course of which the deceased died and there is a counter-version of the present case, let the petitioners, above named, who are in custody since 23.3.2010 and 12.3.2010 respectively be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Sahar P.S. Case No. 44 of 2009 (G.R. No. 1968 of 2009), subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, - 2 - their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv) that the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)