IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:12581 of 2000 Between: 1 Ms. Jyothi Mullapudi D/o Dr. Ratnam V. Mullapudi (rep. by Her Father Dr. Ratnam) R/o 6-3-628/10, Ravindra Nagar, Hyderabad 2 Usha Mullapudi Cardiac Centre rep. by Managing Trustee Dr. Ratnam V. Mullapudi R/o 6-3-628/10, Ravindra Nagar, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Govt. of A.P. rep. by Secretary, Revenue Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 District Collector R.R. Dist. Lakdikapul Hyderabad 3 Mandal Revenue Officer, Quthbullapur (M) Qutbullapur, R.R. Dist. 4 Spl. Officer & Competent Authority Urban Land Ceiling Chandra Vihar, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:NONE APPEARED Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “Under these circumstances, it is just and necessary to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari declaring the proceedings vide C.C.No.F1/7777/76, C.C.No.F1/6967/76 and C.C.No.F1/6968/76 dt: 28-9-93 and under Sec. 10(6) dt: 28-2-2000 are illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and issue rule nisi and quash the same.” At the hearing, as no one represented the petitioners on 18.07.2008, the writ petition is adjourned for today for being posted under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, no one appeared for the petitioners, when the case is called. Hence, it is reasonable to presume that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the cause in the writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 21st JULY, 2008. kvni