THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3805 OF 2007 DT.01.07.2010 Between: Dharmala Durga Prasad ………Petitioner Vs. Mula Harikrishna ……………….Respondent. O R D E R: The petitioner who is the judgment debtor filed this revision petition under Section 115 of C.P.C., seeking to assail the order of arrest passed in E.P.No.186 of 2003 in pursuance of the decree passed in O.S.No.1557 of 1999, dated 09.08.2007 on the file of II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. Though several contentions are said to have been raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner, however, having regard to the fact that the court below, on appreciation of evidence and material placed on record, found that though the petitioner is having means to pay the amount, he is avoiding to discharge the liability. In view of such categorical finding of the court below, this court did not find any reason to interfere with the said order. Hence, I do not find any merit in the revision petition. The revision petition is, therefore, dismissed. However, taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has already deposited 1/4th of the amount as per the interim order passed by this court, dated 24.08.2007, he is permitted to deposit the balance amount within a period of six weeks from today. It is also made clear that in the event if the petitioner commits any default in payment of the amount, the order of the court below revives back. No order as to costs. __________________ B.PRAKASH RAO J., Dt.01.07.2010 tjs