IN TH£J-IIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT ^ CONTEMPT^^SE^CivilVNO. ^S-^2007 J^L^~ (ARISING OUT OF AN ORDER DATED 24.8.2006 PASSED BY HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE IN W.P. No.4513/2006) PETITIONERS 'a! CONTEMTNOR 1. Adiwasi Vidyarthi Palak Sangh An Association of Parent/Guardians of Students belonging to Schedule Tribe Studying in Radjant Public School, Raipur situated at Radiant Public School Dhamtari Road, Raipur (C.G.). Krishna Chandra Bariha, S/o Shri Maya Dhan Bariha, Aged about 41 years, President, Adivasi Vidyarthi Palak Sangh; R/o Lodhi Para, Raipur (C.G.) j Amarnath Rana, S/o Shri A.R.Rana, Aged about 42 years, Secretary, Adivasi Vidyarthi Palak Sangh, R/6 Civil Lines, Kondagaon, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS B.L.Thakur, Commissioner, Department »fScheduleTribe, Schedule Caste and Backward Classes and Minority Development,Raipur (C.G.) CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIU UNDERARTICLE 2150F THE CONST!TUTION OF INDIA READWItH SECTION 10 ^OF CONTEMPTSOFCOURTACT 1971 °^ sn^r^i l^iRi'snlRr sb+iicti ^t^t ^ •'-U-^t- Deepli -Svf ^ww^, ^W , hwwy. 3Tl^?T TR^ ....a-t^....q^-if/^ *<l*inl sbtlch fN^a' an^i's^'reTtifei SB : Hpn'ble Shri Manindra Mohah Shrivastava. J. 11-02-2011 Shri Anand Dadaria, counsei Shri Paliav Mishra, counsei fi ihough, petitioner has aii^ged in the contempt petition that the respondent by not issuing any c( accordance with status auo ordeit W.P.(C) No. 4513/06, in the repiy fii| transfer of students to other institu] this Court and has further siated th; treated as cancelied. in view of the aforesaid dis repiy by the respondent, i do not contempt of the order of this Court. petition is dismissed. 4»Hlct'*ftT1 ^il^cTf^ Ts^l <^<^.l< '^3lfiOT3iI^t for the petitioners. >r the respondent. Irection to various authorities to act in t, passed by this Court on 24/08/06 in l^d by the respondent, copy of ietter dated 24/3/07 (Annexure R/1) has been ||)iaced on record wherein the schooi has been informed that the respondent itas not issued any letter from his ofRce for ions, in view of interim order passed by it ietter issued to various authorities were [slosure and the averments made in the pnd that respondent has committed any 1 Accordingly, the rule is discharged. The Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge