IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.6178 of 1996 Between: 1 Siddartha Mahila Mandali, A Society Registered under the A.P. (Telangana Area) Public Registeration Societies Act 1315 Fasli, Rep by tis President Smt.K.Radha Devi, W/o K.V.N.Appa Rao, Aged 62 yrs, R/o Siddharthanaagr, Kazipet, Warangal District. 2 A.Satyanaryana Raju, S/o A.S.N.Raju, R/o Siddarthanagar, Hanamkonda, Warangal Town, Warnagal. 3 A.Ramachandra Reddy, S/o Narasimha Reddy, R/o Siddarthanagar, Hanamkonda, Warangal Town, Warnagal. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Govt of A.P., Rep by its Secretary, Municipal Administration Urban Devep., Authority, Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 Municipal Council of Warangal, Rep by its Special Officer-cum- Commissioner, Warangal. 3 Kakatiya Urban Development Authority, Rep by its Vice Chairman, Warangal. 4 Dr.P.Parsoramaiah, S/o not known, Nandanam Apartments, Fateh Sultan lane, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad. 5 P.Bhanu Kumar, S/o Parsoramaiah, Nandanam Apartments, Fateh Sultan lane, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of "Writ of Certiorari" calling for the records of the 1st respondents Impugned order made in G.O.Ms.No.406 M.A. dt 23-9-95 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, and without Jurisdiction. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.6178 of 1996 ORDER: The matter relates to change of land use of open space in L.P.No.24 of 1976 and deletion of 50 feet master plan road and as no objections or suggestions have been received from the public within the prescribed period of 15 days, the impugned G.O.Ms.No.406, dated 23-09-1995, has been passed. Questioning the said G.O., this writ petition has been filed. On 13-06-2008, at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the matter was adjourned for two weeks. Today, though the matter was posted under the caption “final hearing”, neither learned counsel for the petitioners is present nor is there any representation on their behalf. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 27-06-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VEENA}