IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 10TH APRIL 2008 / 21ST CHAITHRA 1930 Crl.MC.No. 1370 of 2008() ----------------------------- C.C.N O. 158/1/07 of METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, KARKADOOMA COURTS, DELHI PETITIONER: ------------ (RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS IN DELHI) SHABU SREEDHARAN, 64, POCKET-V, MAYUR VIHAR PHASE 1, DELHI-9. (PERMANENT ADDRESS): SHABU SREEDHARAN, SREESYLAM, THEKKEVILA P.O., KOLLAM 691 016. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.PRASAD SRI.ABHILASH S.FRANCIS RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, CHATHANNOOR, KOLLAM. 3. THE SUB-INSPECTOR, CHATHANNUR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM. (ALL RESPONDENTS ARE REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM) BY ADV. SRI. K.S. SIVAKUMAR, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR , J. ========================== Crl.M.C. No. 1370 of 2008 ========================== Dated this the 10th day of April, 2008. O R D E R The grievance of the petitioner is that the Superintendent of Police , Kollam, the Circle Inspector of Police, Chathannoor and Sub Inspector of Police, Chathannoor who are the respondents to this petition are not executing the non-bailable warrants of arrest issued by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Karkardooma Court, Delhi against the accused one Leela krishnan, Arappura Veedu, Uliyanadu, Karamkodu P.O., Kollam District. The petitioner contends that there is inaction and connivance on the part of the respondents in executing the non-bailable warrants of arrest against the said Leela Krishnan. According to the petitioner, the said accused person is very much available in his address. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that even though the police had made several attempts to arrest the said accused, they have not been able to succeed in their attempts and on enquiry with the family members of the accused CRL.M.C. NO. 1370/2008 : 2: and others it has been revealed that the accused slipped out to Bombay. If, according to the petitioner, the accused is very much available in his address at Uliyanadu, he may point out the accused to any of the three respondents herein to facilitate the arrest of the accused Leela Krishnan. Leaving open this liberty to the petitioner, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv CRL.M.C. NO. 1370/2008 : 3: