THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI W.P.No.23836 of 2005 Date : 10-02-2011 Between : Burra Narsaiah .. Petitioner and The Municipal Corporation, Karimnagar Municipality, rep. by its Commissioner, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI W.P.No.23836 of 2005 ORDER : The petitioner claims to be the owner of plot Nos.11, 12 and 25 in Sy.Nos.978 and 975, situated in Ramnagar Area of Karimnagar Town, by virtue of registered sale deeds, dated 24-02-1986 and 19-01-1993. It is stated that the respondent-municipality by its orders, dated 18-03-2005 and 07-04-2005 granted permission for construction of residential building on the said plots. The petitioner has undertaken construction in accordance with the sanctioned plan. While so, it is stated that on 23- 10-2005 the officials of the respondent demolished a part of the structure on the northern side of the building without heeding to the objection that the construction was strictly in accordance with the sanctioned plan. Apprehending that the remaining part of the building also would be demolished even without notice, the petitioner has filed this writ petition to declare that he is entitled to undertake the construction in terms of the aforesaid plan. The Municipality has also assigned the numbers 9-1-181 and 9-1-182 to the said houses. Heard Sri M.Surender Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Shanthi Neelam, learned standing counsel for Municipal Corporation, Telangana. The short grievance presented by the petitioner in this Writ Petition is that he is entitled to make constructions in accordance with the permission and the sanctioned plan and that the respondent has no authority of law to interfere with such construction undertaken by him. There cannot be any dispute that once the construction permission is granted and unless cancelled or revised the same, the applicant is entitled to make construction in accordance with the permission. The authorities cannot assume any power to interdict such constructions. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of as follows : (i) The petitioner shall be allowed to undertake the construction strictly in accordance with the sanctioned plan and permission accorded by the respondent; and (ii) The respondent is at liberty to verify the construction undertaken by the petitioner and if it is found that any deviation has been committed, it is at liberty to demolish the same to bring the construction in consonance with the sanctioned plan without further notice to the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J. 10th February, 2011. skmr