CM No.7995-C of 2010 ::1:: in RSA No.4416 of 2009 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.7995-C of 2010 in RSA No.4416 of 2009 (O & M) Date of decision:23.07.2010 Jagwant Singh @ Jaswant Singh ..Appellant Versus Mahan Singh @ Maru and others. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG a). Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? b). To be referred to the Reporters or not ? c). Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present:- Mr.H.R.Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr.R.K.Battas, Advocate for the appellant. RAKESH KUMAR GARG J. (ORAL) The plaintiff-appellant filed the instant suit for declaration to the effect that he was exclusive owner in possession of the suit land on the basis of a family partition and for permanent injunction for restraining the defendant-respondents from interfering in his possession and alienating the suit land. The aforesaid suit was partly decreed by the Trial Court holding that the plaintiff-appellant was in exclusive possession of the suit land being a co-owner. The appeal filed by the appellant against the aforesaid decree was dismissed. The present appeal has been filed by the plaintiff- appellant challenging the aforesaid judgments and decrees of the Courts below. Vide this application, it has been submitted that the dispute between the parties in respect of the suit land has been settled, out of the Court in a Panchayati Razinama. The aforesaid compromise has CM No.7995-C of 2010 ::2:: in RSA No.4416 of 2009 (O & M) been attached alongwith this application as Annexure A-1. It has been submitted in this agreement that the appellant has transferred the land in favour of the respondents by way of a registered sale deed and has received full and final payment against the aforesaid land and in view of the aforesaid compromise, the appellant does not wish to press this appeal and wants to withdraw the same. This application is duly supported by an affidavit of the appellant and the thumb-impression of the appellant on this affidavit has been duly identified by his counsel Mr.H.R.Bhardwaj, Advocate. In view of the prayer made in the application which is duly supported by an affidavit, the prayer of the appellant-applicant is allowed and the present appeal is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn. Disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) July 23, 2010 JUDGE Sukhpreet