C^-f ^ ^ BEPORE THE HON'BLE mGH COURT OF CHHATFISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l WRTT PETITION (S) N0. ^-4-^ 8 /2006 PEH'ITIONER ^' /CK.-- ^^?y ^^y' '^>..---i'?<oy'' ^•'r'hV' -••'''.^^- ^"&>s.-'' V'O" <<;yi7' ^"" RESPONDENTS Chanesh Ram Dansena, aged- iT about 31 years, son of Shri Muiu Ram Dansena, Pancliayat Karau / Secretary, Gram Panchayat Banbhaiu-a, resident of village Banbhaura, Post Banbhaiira, Tah Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chliattisgarh,< thrRugb —tfae Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Social Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur(CG) 2. The Awar Sachiv, Departm.ent of ^, Panchayat and Social Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. The Chief Executive Officer, janpad Panchayat lOiarsia, District Raigarh (Chliattis^rh) 4. The Deputy Director, Department of Panchayat and Social Welfare, District Raigarh (Chhaftisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTETUTION OP INDIA. ..c^% njliLli!niiiu«liua*nutiiilnirm«(t]U«*nil XI-HC-78 +ii^wi ai<i 3^? "s<l<<|i?1<<, (STflti'ld, (°lfll<iy ^b3)pmMU.^^^2oo4 3)l^?l 4acn (yil^l^ff) 3n^T?ffR-ii+ (raT^T^Tsht<i<* SRITW trfN sn^r <*ii<<t7i<fl-f 11*1ciT ^ teA <Ri<i;i< ^rsTf^trsn^r 28.8.20< Shri Awadh Tripathi, counse| for the pettConer. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Go\<emment Advocate for the State/ respondente No.1,2 and 4, on adv^nc®COPY- Heard both the counset. By this petition, the petjtior] ith dated 30"' June 20)6 whereby h Panchayat Kharsiya, District Raiga District Dantewada showing him as The main grievance of the p^titioner is that he was appointed in ttie year 1996 as Panchayat Karmi a^ has been transferred showing a^ whereas, he has never been app|ointed as Assistant Gram Panchayat Adhikari. Leamed counsel for the peti| been transferred showing him a^ whereas he is simply a Panchayat notice and in turn, he be directed to| representation along with a copy oi respondent No.2 within a period ler has challenged his fransfer order s has been transferred from Janpad rh to Janpad Panchayat Kuwantonda, Assistant Gram Panchayat Adhikari. Gram Panchayat Barbhauna and he Assistant Gram Panchayat Adhikari iioner sutenitted that the pedtioner has Assistant Gram Panchayat Adhikari <armi, therefore, he may be altowed to make a representation to resporupent No.2 brining ttiis mistake to his decide the same, to whteh counsel fw respondents has no objection. Having heard tearned counsjel for the parties, having regard to the facts and cireumstances of the casje, and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the petftioner is altowed to make a detailed this writ petition and its annexures to of 2 weeks from today and in tum, respondent No.2 shall decide the |representation of the petUionerwithin another 4 weeks from the date ^f receipt of the representation, after P.T.O. XI-HC-78 ^sTarraRra', wxn'M'ie, Rii~)iti^< *<l*I^ITsh*11ch ^ 200 W^TTg^T ('^3g^£r) 3n^T?iTR-fi°b (raT^'i^TaiHich Barve c (?*s ?T(iTWHf?(Tsn^r ^ considering all the points raisedby in accordancewith law. In the meantime, till the petitioner shatl not be relieved from With the direction aforesaid, Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.; Parties are entitled for certifii +i'iifd41-t wraY^'te^t'iRfWK. ^;3iR)t< sn^yr the petitioner, in an objecUve manner, decision of the representation, the the present place of posting. the petition stands disposed of. 3472/2006 also stands dispcsed of. sd copy of this order. ___——— Sd/- ^C.Bhado< 3udge P.T.O. \