IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30839 of 2008 VIKRAM KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 3. 31.7.2008 Heard. After having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the earlier order passed by me in Cr. Misc. Nos. 28316 of 2007 and 13569 of 2007, I find myself not at all inclined to reconsider the prayer for bail. The petition is dismissed. However, my attention was drawn by learned counsel for the petitioner to the melody which the petitioner has to suffer on account of the court below not taking the matter of the petitioner or any other accused who could be in custody in the case as a matter of seriousness. The court below must be aware of the position of law that speedy trial is the right of an accused and if the trial court liberally allows the accused to be represented or sleeps over some dilatory tactics adopted by one accused or the other then the speedy trial of the accused who are 2 in custody would simply become all the more difficult. The assessment of innocence is a human right and the court has to alike to that situation as well that it exists for the justice or protection of the human right and not to incarcerate any accused merely because there is a F.I.R. or a chargesheet and that too without taking the trial with seriousness. I direct the court below to appreciate the above observations of this Court and, thus, anxiety of this Court as well and to take up the hearing of the trial diddums unless there is an existing ground which could be acceptable to a reasonable man. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)