IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2009 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 9318 of 2009(H) ------------------------------- PETITIONER : -------------------- SAPNAM S.S., FOURTH YEAR B. PHARM, THE DALE VIEW COLLEGE OF PHARMACY & RESEARCH CENTRE, PUNALAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.HARISH RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE VICE -CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. KERALA UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, UNIVERSITY BUILDINGS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, THE DALE VIEW COLLEGE OF PHARMACY & RESEARCH CETNRE, PUNALAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. - 695 575. MR. ADV. M. RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC, KERALA UNIVERSITY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 9318 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner is a B. Pharm final year student. Her examination is to start on 26th of this month. 2. She has three back papers of the second year to be cleared. In view of the regulation that the student should clear all papers to appear for the final year examinations, the petitioner has not been issued hall ticket. Thereupon, she filed Exhibit P7 representation before the first respondent pointing out Exhibit P5, an order dated 18/11/2008 giving relaxation to certain candidates. In this writ petition, the petitioner submits that in view of Exhibit P5, the regulation should be relaxed and that the petitioner should be permitted to appear for the final year examinations. 3. As already noticed, the regulation prescribes that a student should pass all papers of the previous examinations, to appear for the final year examination. Admittedly, the petitioner has not complied with this requirement. If that be so, this Court will not be justified in issuing any direction as sought for by the W.P.(C) No. 9318/2009 2 petitioner. However, having regard to the pendency of Exhibit P7 before the first respondent, I direct the first respondent to pass orders immediately on Exhibit P7, considering the grievance of the petitioner. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE scm