w IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIIASPUR WRIT PE TITION N0. ^ 3 e3 /2002 PETmQNER -s^mS^ Kantraj, S/o Shri Krishnaswami, aged 35 ysars, R/o Rajaswa Colony, near Chantidih, Bilaspur (C.G.5 -VERSUS- RESPONDENTS :.f->^>'".. !>''..-''\'r<r.-''~ S-/'.''"!-QX-'-"' ^ . :':^:€^' ^^y -^ \ .ff~ ^•'\f1K- ^\--^ <• t'; State ofChhattisgarh througfa Secretary, General Administration Department, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Panchayat & Social service, Chhattisgarb, Raipur. Joint Director, Pancfaayat & Social Senriee, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur. District Rehabilitation OfBcer, Bilaspur. WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 22~6/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA C^s> FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WMT. ORDERS OR MRECTION. l°^hunibj^andrespectfully begs to submit A^- XI-HC-22 r^^ira^ra, sTil'Miid, •SIR^^I TFiT?r 3'!IS?I ^-il^^TT^cT ^.^.•.SS.0..4.^,L...'Jfs 2CO l^ •k~ SITCT'??aiw w??i ^RT"T3TT;:T T?TET^f ^ f^t '7f^f??R '^ SIRTq 3TI^?T Sbri Indrasen Sahu, couujsel for the petitioner- Shri Ranbir Siagh, Govt. ^.dv. for fhe State. Heard. In view of the Innited nat(ire of prayer made at the time of 1 hearing which is for a directi.o4 to fhe appropriate aiittiority to take a decision on the petitione^-'s representation, copy where is Annexure P-10 to ttie writ petitlon, no useful purpose would be served in keepiag this writ petitton as the same can be disposed ofat fhis stage. | It is thc case of fhc pcti|ioncr fhat he was a daily wagc eBiployec appointcd against ^ vacaat and regular post of shoeniaker^ in fhe District Reb^.bititation Centre, Accordiag to Tnm, he being a ineiuber of fhe Scheduled Caste was entitted to be regularized against the ^egular post in tenns of fhe notification dated 27-07-1996. putigaoring the said notification, his case has not been conside^ed. A representation (Annexure P-10) was also subiaitted to fhejrespondent No.3- Joint Director, Padchayat & Social Service, BUaspur Division, Bilaspur, wliich XtfHC-22 ^^B^^B ^^;'"Ml4ic1''TT«'fflwis,/RMi¥i'y. ;^^^:"^fi;^-S^^S ^ii^^^^i.r.i'^'^^^ij^ qn-R'ffwn^ "V^ 200'L affiSl^T 3TE5T ' '-*'V ^ar13T^'<?r^T i-SEiitea BgSIW;»f "^p ./ k hj aii^i'FRIW :afOT ^viiig not been considered, he has r41ief. +.l^ii'l4'l-i 'WRff •? 'ferit TfSR?R ^i'srf^s'iiSr approached this Court for Siace the representation is ad^uittedly pending, this wrrit p^tition is disposed ofby du-ecting fiie said respondent No.3 or afay such ofher coinpetent aufhority jto consMer fhe petitioner^s ipresentation and take aa appropri&te decisiou thereon on its own merits, withia a period of foujr weeks fi-om fhe date of c^imniunicatioii/ receipt of this orderi It is inade clear that ffais 1 Clourt is not expressittg aay opislps- on fhe merits of fhe p^titioner's case aad that representa^ion wilt Iiave to be decided b^ fhe concemed aufhority on its ow4 inerits. Conscqucntly M.W.P. No.564/^002 for interim relicf & I.A. |o.4467/2002 for urgent hearuig alsi^ staad disposed of. Certified copy as per Rules. Sdl- P.C NAIK Judge :<o3£ian.