IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47979 of 2008 SUMARO RAM … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner:Shri Jagdish Pd. No.1 For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta,APP ----------- 3. 16.1.12009 Heard. The petitioner is said to have given repeated chhura blows to the informant. The Doctor examining the informant found as many as four injuries on the person of the informant which were of two incised wounds, one bruise and the third was a scratch. The two incises wounds were measuring 1 X”X1½” X cavity deep and 1” X ½” X skin deep. There is no final opinion about the nature of the injury but the injury no.1 which is cavity deep could indicate its dangerousness and the magnitude. It is true that no motive was assigned as to why the accused could be assaulting the informant but having regard to the nature of the injury, I am not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner on bail for the present. The chargehseet has been submitted. 2 The case has to be omitted without any loss of time and as soon as it is committed, the court of Sessions shall take steps for examination of the informant at the earliest whereafter it shall release the petitioner on bail on his furnishing a bond to its own satisfaction. With the above observation, this petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)