((-1-)) HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8931 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 8931 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 8931 OF 2007 Sonneneflex Abrasives (P) Ltd. ... Petitioner Versus The Union of India and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. V.Sreedharan with Mr. P.D.Shah i/y M/s.PDS Legal for Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Rao with Mr.A.M. Sethna for Respondents. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: FEBRUARY 07, 2008 DATED: FEBRUARY 07, 2008 DATED: FEBRUARY 07, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The Petitioner had preferred an appeal against the order of the A.O. The tribunal has granted relief but dismissed the appeal on the ground of limitation. Hence, the present petition. . It is urged on behalf of the Petitioner that the Petitioner has stopped using the words "in collaboration with" and this has been accepted for the earlier years and also for subsequent years. It is therefore, submitted that in these circumstances, this court should exercise its extra ordinary jurisdiction. . We have seen the impugned order of the A.O. The ((-2-)) A.O. had proceeded on certain facts and on that assumption of facts consequently may have arrived at a wrong conclusion. That would not fall within exception for exercising extra ordinary jurisdiction as set out in the case of State of U.P. Vs. Mohd Noor AIR 1958 (SC) 66. . Considering the above, in our opinion, this will not be a fit case to exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction. Hence, Petition dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)