1 M (^o<7 \ys^ ^;3 j» t?^TO^a IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BIIASPUR (CHHATTISGZ^RH) W.P. (C) No. 337^ Of 2010 PETITIONERS Ni?.^^4s ^ ^•'- .0...••"' ^•'o'^'..-^" :^.h<^..'l-\"^ -^il^" -.•'.,'•<. a+ •Q ^'. .'. \~^' !<S& ^•- RESPONDENTS Agrasen Mahavidyalaya, through its Director Dr.V.K. Agrawal, Jaitusao Math Parisar, Purani Basti, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 492001. Versus /:!) Regional National Teacher Western Committee, Shyamla (M.P.) /:2) National Teacher through Secretary, Director, Council for Education, Regional Manas Bhawan, Hills, Bhopal Council for Education, its Member New Delhi WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA /l-iS-" • ^'' J' p- "•^^••.•S'Si HK3H COURTOFCMHAmSG^lH ATBtLA^»UR WRIT PETn-ION (Ct N0.3974 OF 2010 Petitioner Agrasen Mahavkiyalaya Versus Respondents Ftegional Dirartor & Another WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22S6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INOIA (SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri H.B.Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Pragya Singh, Advocate forthe petitloner. Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, Advocate for the respondarts. 3. ORDERtORALI (F^ssed on 2tfh day cf August, 2010) By this petition, petitioner sed<s a directkm to stay (^eratton of the withdrawal order dated 12/18-5-2010 (Annexure A-6) as filed in appeal pending betorettw responctent No.2. This isan unusual writ petition. Admittedly, the appeal fited under provislons of Section 18 of National Council Tor Teachere Eckication Act, 1993 is pending consideration before the respondent No.2. The mpugned order dated 12/18-5-2010 (Annexure A-6) is the subject matter of consideration befbre the Appellate Auttiority. The prayer is to^ay operation of the withdrawal order dated 12/18-5-2010 (AnneMire A- 6), whieh is pendlng conskleration befbre the respondent No.2. On h^ring of the learned counsel appearing for the petlticmer arwi perusal of the papers, no case has been mad®out to show any cause of action,lnvoking jurisdtetion <rf this Court under Arttete 226 of the Constitution, in the instant petition. Thus, the petition is not maintainabte for want of cause of action. It appears to be abuse and misuse ofjudicial process. Accordingly, the wrtt pd:ition Is dismissed as not maintainabte. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge \0