'^ IN THE HIGhLCOURT_QF^:H HATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) W-rTi [R 6'Karttk Sagar Dhruva, aged about 41 years, son of Shri Jagtu Ram Dhruva, occupation - Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Tribal Deptt. Patthalgaon Distt. Jashpur (CG) ./ ^°\^;->••••" ^;. J'y 2. o.^'^' .-•'r> ^,^T\..--^/ (<6"A--" r»' »» 3. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhswan, Raipur (C.G.) Asst. Commissioner, Deptt ofTribal Welfare, Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur CG Block Education Officer, Block - Patthalgaon, Distt. Jashpur (CG) Uii^iifflW^ 3it^;qn1?iiW wn siKs aiw €-3> ^^^nzn^r?r,.-g-TftgTTC', [s!<»i!y"<. U ) Vul9,, S aii^ixra^T ('^3^') qipif?pfrr WRff ^1stzt tf^RSR ^istRmsn^R SB: ffon'Bie snrriBlamIn3raWld n Shnvaste^Bsl fi7-Q7-2filO Shri A.N. Bhakta, counsel ft( Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Pane| Heard. Leamed counsel appearing passed B.T.i. ©xamination beforej submitted that tha issue involvedi rthepeUtioner. , Lawyer for the Stat^respondents, ^or the peUtfonw submite that the petitioner is entiUed to benefit of two adva(ice incremente on account of hs havtng hls appointment at his own cost. tt is in the present petition is no ionger nas integia and ths same has been fin^lly dechled by the Hon'ble Supreme Ceurt in the case ofAsha Saxma vs. State ofM.P. & Ors.. 2009 fWLMP^SfSD) 59. It Is turther submitted that thfe Gourt has aiso taken a similar WWM m its order dated 06-02-2009 passed lin W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Leamed counsel tor the petitioner further drjaws attention of this Qouit to order dated 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal (<ilo.124 <rf 2009, wherefn retying upon (he judgment of the Supreme Court in <he case of Asha Saxena (suf»a)and ttie order passed by this Court in an^ther Writ Appeal NoS7{20 , direcUons have been issued for consideratio|n of the case for grant of two advanee increments as per cireular dated 21-09-1974 Issued by theState of Madhya Pradesh, after verificaUon ofthe fac^ pleaded in the pstitlon. ^ ; ; Learned counsel for the i peUUoner woutd also be considered espondents submits that ease of the on ttwsame lines. 5uy^ m5B'7.;TS'-T-<FIT?—FS7147—2/2010—1,00,000. '"•^h^ - 1. m-Hc—js ..•<•-• T^ '<<1<)1<1^, y!ll'(-i'!l<o, fsicll'My ^....M.S).^..^^./.^ ssn^r w R-fi* PCTSn^IwqN Diaspli winK^tefw^i -3- In view of the statement mat off with a direcBon to the respondejnt claim of the petitioner for grant of| dated 21-09-1974 issued by the Staf the facts ptoadedin ttie petiUon withj +i<iS<-)41-f iwrcff Tf fs'S <fa*^!< ^»siRnan^t de above, tWspeiUton is finallydisposed .•^;::"";7"?'":.'.'-!y auttioriUes to considerand deckte-toe two advance inerwnente as per ciroular te of Madhya Pradesh, after verifieation of in a period af eight weel®from today. ; Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge