n.n;ir Iffc^ ^ '!gw'£?'? a^ ; ^ 1 \^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM; HON'BLEMR. T.P. SHARMA & HON'BLE MR. R. L. JHANWAR, JJ. APPELLANTS CLAIMANTS M. A. No.503/2006 Smt. Anita Singh W/o Manoranjan Singh aged about 29 years occupation housework by caste-Goan. Ku. Deepa Singh D/o Late Shri Manoranjan Singh aged about 15 years, occupation student by caste- Goan - Through: Mindr her niother Anita Singh) Rajeev Kun-iar S/o Lat Shri Manoranjan Singh aged about 13 years, occupation student caste- Goan Through: Minor his mother Anita Singh) Sanjay Kumar S/o Late Shri Manoranjan Singh aged about 1 1 years, occupation student caste- Goan Through: Minor his mother Anita Singh) Kumari Sangita Singh D/o Late Shri Manoranjan Singh aged about 9 years, caste- Goan Through: Minor her raother Anita Singh) All are R/o village Lanchi P/s and Tah. Surajpur Distt. Surguja (C.G.) RESPONDENTS INSUjlANCE OWNER Versus 1. 2. DRIVER 3. United India Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) Vishnu Pratap Agrawal S/o Not Known in present R/o Bishrampur Tah. Surajpur Distt. Surguja (C.G.) Methlesh Singh S/o Indradev ^ Singh (Driver) Present Address C/o Vishnu Pratap Agrawal Bishrampur P/s Bishrampur Tah. Surajpur Distt. Surguja (C.G.) APPEAL U/S 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT. 1988. Present:- None for the appellants. None for the respondents. ORAL-JUDGEMENT (Passedon 05/07/2010) The following iudgment of the Court was passed by T.P. Sharma, J:- 1. Memo of appeal and award impugned perused. Present appellants have preferred appeal against the award dated 20/1/06 passed by First Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Surajpur, District Surguja in M.A.C.C. No. 148/2004. On 18/4/2006 another M.A. No. 468/06 has been filed by the same party, against same respondents, against same award. On 6/4/06 after filing of the M.A. No. 468/06 this present appeal is unnecessary. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed as unnecessary. 2. Although counsel for the appellants may represent the appellants in M.A. No. 468/06 along with counsel of the appellants, after filing Power/Vakalatnama. 3. Copy of order be kept in M.A. No. 468/06. 4. No order as to costs. Sd/- T'-P.Sharma Judge Sd/- R.L. Jhanwar Judse