IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 26519 of 2007 Between: 1 Mohammed Sayeeduddin S/o. Late Mohd. Abdul Hameed R/o. H.No. 8-2-603/2/B, Zehra Nagar, Road No. 10 Banjarahills, Hyderabad. 2 Mohammed Khaja Moinuddin S/o. Mohd. Sayeeduddin R/o. H.No. 8-2-603/2/B, Zehra Nagar, Road No. 10 Banjarahills, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, through its Secretary, Revenue Department, Having office at Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Hyderabad having office at Chirab Ali Lane, Abids, Hyderabad. 3 The Tahsildar, Sheikpet Mandal, Hyderabad District, having office at Road No.2, Banjarahills, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that the respondents have no right whatsoever to dispossess or dismantle the petitioners from their property bearing No. 8-2-603/2/B, admeasuring 730 sq. yard situated aet Zehra Nagar, Road No. 10, Banjarahills, Hyderabad without following due process of law is arbitrary, illegal and in violation of Article 300 of the Constitution of India. Consequently this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dismantle or dispossess the petitioners from their property bearing No. 8-2-603/2/B, admeasuring 730 sq. yards situated at Zehra Nagar, Road No. 10, Banjarahills, Hyderabad in any illegal, manner whatsoever and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MOHD.MOIN AHMED QUADRI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.26519 of 2007 ORAL ORDER: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 17.06.2008, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, when the matter is called, none appeared for the petitioners nor is there any representation made on their behalf. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J. Date: 24.06.2008. VGSR