IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.673 of 2009 1. MD.NAIM 2. Md. Nehal Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 4.9.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner was an accused in Ara Town P.S. Case No. 160 of 2008 registered for offence under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 342/34 of the Penal Code. He surrendered on 9.3.2009 and was remanded to custody on 18.3.2009. Cognizance was taken again on 8.4.2009 after investigation was completed. The present writ application has been filed much belatedly on 26.8.2009 questioning the continued custody on remand after 18.3.2009 without any further orders of remand or production in Court. On facts as placed by the petitioner himself, he has only himself to blame for the latches on his part as he did not choose to come before this Court during the period of investigation when he was allegedly kept in custody without proper orders of remand as urged. Once charge sheet was submitted, investigation completed and cognizance taken on 8.4.2009, the entire issue of remand for an earlier period becomes academic. The law stands well settled that the Court 2 does not decide the academic matters unless they have wide ranging implication for the society in general. The application is, therefore, disposed off as having become infructuous. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)