1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 3395 of 2008 In Criminal Appeal No. 661 of 2008 Ravi v. Pradip and State of Maharashtra -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr J.B. Kasat, Adv for applicant/appellant Mr A. Parihar, APP for respondent no.2. Coram: A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 2nd September 2009 Heard learned counsel for the applicant. None appears for respondent no.2 though served. Perused the application and accompanying memo of appeal. Since arguable case is made out, leave deserves to be granted and appeal admitted. Hence, leave granted. Appeal admitted. Call for R & P. Mr Kasat contends that since copies of all relevant documents have been filed, filing of private paper book may be dispensed with. In view of the submission made, filing of private paper book is dispensed with. However, learned counsel for applicant shall supply entire set of documents to respondents. Mr A. Parihar, learned APP waives notice for respondent no. 2. 2 Judge. hsj