IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2814 of 2010 1. SHIV KUMAR PRASAD S/O SRI BALDEO YADAV R/O VILL- DEOKALI, P.S MANPUR, DISTT- NALANDA 2. RAM ISHWAR PRASAD S/O LATE RAMBRIKSH PRASAD R/O VILL- TARAPUR, P.S DEEPNAGAR, DISTT- NALANDA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVT.OF BIHAR,PATNA 3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVT.OF BIHAR,PATNA 4. PRESIDENT, SELECTION PARISHAD BOARD NO.2, NORTH ZONE, POLICE FORCE,MUZAFFARPUR CUM COMMANDANT, BIHAR POLICE FORCE-6, MUZAFFARPUR 5. DISTRICT COMMANDANT BIHAR HOMEGUARD POLICE, NALANDA ----------- 2. 26.08.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner claims to be an applicant in response to advertisement no. 1/2004 for appointment as Constable under the 50% seats reserved for Home Guard. There are no allegations of marks obtained by him, any person with lesser marks having been appointed or merit panel having been violated. Only because the respondents may have sought verification of his claim of Home Guard status per se does not create any right in him. Only if the petitioner files a representation making detailed disclosure of hostile discrimination, arbitrariness and violation of the merit panel with full details of the name of the candidates in that event alone the respondents are required to consider his representation and dispose it of expeditiously in accordance with law. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)