mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.209 OF 2010 Sau.tulsabai Balwant Chile and others Petitioners versus Shamrao Dattoba Desai Respondent Vikas Mali for petitioner. P.D.Dalvi for respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 15th April 2010 PC : 1. Apart from the fact that the impugned order is purely of interlocutory nature, I find that the same has been passed on 1st December 2005. The present petition is filed on 19th December 2009. There is absolutely no explanation in the memorandum of writ petition for the delay of about four years. Therefore, at this stage, no case for interference is made out. The writ petition is rejected. However, it will be open for the petitioners to challenge the impugned order in an appeal which may be preferred by them against the decree passed in the suit, if the same be adverse to them. Subject to what is observed above, the writ petition is rejected. All contentions of the parties in the suit are kept open. (A.S.OKA, J.)