IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6272 of 2010 MUKESH RAJWANSHI & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 9.4.2010 KHAN Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case under sections 147,323, 341 and 380 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner nos.3 and 4 are female members. There is no allegation of theft against petitioner no.1. The allegation of theft against petitioner no.2 is an exaggeration. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner no.2 Sakendra Rajwanshi. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, if he surrenders and prays for regular bail, the same would be disposed of preferably on the same day on its own merits. So far as petitioner nos.1, 3 and 4 namely Mukesh Rajwanshi, Sangita Devi and Radha Devi are concerned, they are directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest/surrender within six weeks from today, in connection with Complaint Case No.881 of 2008 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada. (S.P.Singh,J)