IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18362 of 2010 MD.SHAKIL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 25.06.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Araria P.S. No. 139 of 2009 for offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. This is the second attempt on the part of the petitioner who has earlier moved for regular bail before this Court and the same has been rejected on 28.10.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 27124 of 2009. The allegation against the petitioner is of snatching the motorcycle of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and that he has remained in custody since 8.4.2009. Taking into consideration the circumstances, let the petitioner namely, Md. Shakil be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the 2 like amount to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Araria P.S. No. 139 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (1) That one of the close relatives of the petitioner would stand as one of the bailors and who would also file an affidavit indicating his relationship with the petitioner. (2) That said bailor would be under a duty to inform the Court below in case this petitioner gets named or gets involved in any other case of similar nature after his release and whereupon the Court concerned shall be at liberty to initiate proceeding for cancellation of the bail bond of the petitioner and for taking him into custody. Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)