IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE. SIDE. SIDE. WRIT PETITION NO. 6327 OF 2006. Kashinath A. Jadhav ... Petitioner. V/s. MSRT Corporation. .. Respondent. Shri M.S. Topkar for the petitioner. CORAM CORAM CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 22.9.2006. : 22.9.2006. : 22.9.2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. Perused petition. 2. Having seen the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the Court below, the view taken by the Courts below is a reasonable and possible view. No perversity in the impugned order could be demonstrated. No case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. Petition is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)