1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. C.A. No. 3283/07 in Criminal Appeal No.373/2006 Pandurang @ ajab Deoman Gawai and 3 others Vs.State of Mah. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE AND A.B.CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED : 17th January, 2008 Heard Ms. Kalsi, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Mujumdar, learned A. P. P. for the respondent. Documents filed by the applicant are taken on record. By this application, the applicant, who is original accused no. 4 in Sessions Trial No.109/2005 before IVth Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati seeks suspension of sentence and grant of bail. The applicant has been convicted along with three others for offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The Trial Court has held that the applicant and her brother caught deceased Ramabai and deceased was set ablaze by accused no.1 Pandurang and accused no.3 2 Nirmalabai. The dying declaration recorded during investigation clearly proves that involvement of the applicants in the commission of the crime. Moreover, earlier bail application filed by all the accused was dismissed by order dated 29.11.2006. The applicant seeks bail on the ground that she has two minor children namely Rohit, aged about 4 years and Ku. Karishma, aged about 7 years and nobody is there to look after them since Dewakabai Gavai, grandmother who was taking care of them expired on 13.8.2007 and presently there is nobody to take care of them. We are not inclined to grant bail on the ground set up in the application having regard to the nature of the crime committed by the applicant. Moreover, the father of the said minor children can definitely take care of them. This is an additional ground on which the present application deserves to be dismissed. In view of the above, we find no merit in the application. The application is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE MLA